Agenda, joint meeting — Sanger City Council, June 15, 2023 (part 2 of 2)

CITY OF SANGER
BEGINNING BALANCE $9,368 $0 $9,357 $0 $9,335 $9,335
TOTAL REVENUE ($11) $0 ($22) $0 $0 $0
NET CHANGE $9,357 $0 $9,335 $0 $9,335 $9,335

REVENUE
080 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT : 101 SANGER PUBLIC FINANCING : 4000 REVENUES ($11) $0 ($22) $0 $0 $0483-080-101-4802 UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) INVESTMENTS ($11) $0 ($22) $0 $0 $0TOTAL
A[484] SANGER PFA-PROPRIETARY This fund accounts for debt held by the Sanger Public Financing Authority.

BEGINNING BALANCE ($45,255) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NET CHANGE ($45,255) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
A[486] SANGER HOUSING AUTHORITY This fund accounts for debt held by the Sanger Housing Authority.

BEGINNING BALANCE $1,287,440 $0 $1,234,401 $0 $1,198,324 $1,147,040 TOTAL REVENUE $42,481 $41,600 $47,860 $41,600 $56,300 $41,600 TOTAL EXPENSE $95,521 $104,000 $83,937 $102,800 $107,584 $115,400 NET CHANGE $1,234,401 ($62,400) $1,198,324 ($61,200) $1,147,040 $1,073,240

REVENUE
080 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT : 101 LOW AND MOD HOUSING : 4000 REVENUES $2,575 $3,100 $1,489 $3,100 $1,500 $3,100486-080-101-4801 INTEREST INCOME ($813) $800 ($1,139) $800 $800 $800486-080-101-4802 UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) INVESTMENTS $24,660 $26,100 $15,082 $26,100 $34,000 $26,100486-080-101-4960 PROCEEDS ON REHAB LOAN $16,059 $11,600 $32,427 $11,600 $20,000 $11,600486-080-101-4961 PROCEEDS ON DAP LOAN $42,481 $41,600 $47,860 $41,600 $56,300 $41,600TOTAL

EXPENSE
060 PUBLIC WORKS : 203 LOW AND MOD HOUSING : 5000 WAGES AND BENEFITS

POSITION SUMMARY FTE AMOUNT
ADMINISTRATIVE SVCS DIRECTOR 0.20 $24,919
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 0.15 $18,233
CITY MANAGER 0.05 $9,633
296
ACCOUNT NAME 2021 (A) 2022 (B) 2022 (A) 2023 (B) 2023 (E) 2024 (P)ACCOUNT OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE
171

CITY OF SANGER
ROUNDUP SALARY BUDGET 0.00 $15
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR - REGULAR 0.40 $52,800
$41,385 $42,600 $34,382 $43,500 $39,000 $52,800486-060-203-5110 DIRECT LABOR-REGULAR $349 $500 $3,045 $500 $0 $500486-060-203-5160 VACATION LEAVE BUY BACK $15,309 $36,000 $15,239 $3,300 $3,000 $4,600486-060-203-5210 PERS EXPENSE $0 $0 $924 $9,600 $9,600 $7,500486-060-203-5219 PERS OBLIGATION BOND $3,099 $3,300 $2,855 $3,300 $3,100 $4,000486-060-203-5220 SOCIAL SECURITY $10,882 $9,700 $6,426 $8,800 $9,280 $10,700486-060-203-5310 HEALTH INSURANCE $319 $400 $414 $4,700 $4,300 $5,700486-060-203-5320 WORKERS COMPENSATION $14 $100 ($7) $0 $14 $100486-060-203-5340 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $9 $100 $8 $0 $10 $100486-060-203-5350 FITNESS PROGRAM $48 $100 $46 $0 $50 $300486-060-203-5410 AUTO ALLOWANCE $261 $300 $180 $200 $130 $200486-060-203-5411 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE $71,674 $93,100 $63,511 $73,900 $68,484 $86,500TOTAL
060 PUBLIC WORKS : 203 LOW AND MOD HOUSING : 6000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES $14,957 $13,200 $5,483 $13,200 $23,400 $13,200486-060-203-6290 SVCS-PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $303 $400 $381 $400 $400 $400486-060-203-6431 GENERAL LIABILITY PREMIUMS $78 $100 $165 $100 $100 $100486-060-203-6432 PROPERTY PREMIUMS $58 $200 $95 $200 $200 $200486-060-203-6438 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE $470 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500486-060-203-6445 DISABILITY INSURANCE $24 $100 $88 $100 $100 $100486-060-203-6448 RISK MGT ADMIN $126 $200 $141 $200 $200 $200486-060-203-6449 ERMA PERSONNEL INSURANCE $16,016 $14,700 $6,853 $14,700 $24,900 $14,700TOTAL
060 PUBLIC WORKS : 203 LOW AND MOD HOUSING : 8000 OTHER CHARGES $7,831 $14,200 $13,573 $14,200 $14,200 $14,200486-060-203-8440 CHARGES FOR INTERNAL ADMIN $7,831 $14,200 $13,573 $14,200 $14,200 $14,200TOTAL
A[487] SANGER FINANCING AUTHORITY This fund accounts for debt held by the Sanger Financing Authority.

BEGINNING BALANCE ($1,507) $0 $8,309,669 $0 $8,511,986 $8,370,604 TOTAL REVENUE $8,627,479 $100 $19,450,000 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL EXPENSE $316,304 $0 $19,247,683 $2,600,000 $141,382 $2,600,000 NET CHANGE $8,309,669 $100 $8,511,986 ($2,600,000) $8,370,604 $5,770,604 297
ACCOUNT NAME 2021 (A) 2022 (B) 2022 (A) 2023 (B) 2023 (E) 2024 (P)ACCOUNT OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE
172

CITY OF SANGER

REVENUE
020 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES : 401 PENSION OBLIGATION BOND SERIES 2021 : 4000 REVENUES $0 $0 $19,450,000 $0 $0 $0487-020-401-4950 PROCEEDS ON SALE OF BONDS $0 $0 $19,450,000 $0 $0 $0TOTAL
050 FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES : 402 FIRE STATION BOND 2020A : 4000 REVENUES $8,626,078 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0487-050-402-4950 PROCEEDS ON SALE OF BONDS $8,626,078 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL
070 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT : 501 SANGER FINANCING AUTHORITY : 4000 REVENUES ($6) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0487-070-501-4802 UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) INVESTMENTS ($6) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL
080 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT : 101 ADMINISTRATION : 4000 REVENUES $2 $100 $0 $0 $0 $0487-080-101-4801 INTEREST INCOME $2 $100 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL
090 NON-DEPARTMENTAL : 101 ADMINISTRATION : 4000 REVENUES $1,405 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0487-090-101-4801 INTEREST INCOME $1,405 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL

EXPENSE
020 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES : 401 PENSION OBLIGATION BOND SERIES 2021 : 8000 OTHER CHARGES $0 $0 $19,095,000 $0 $0 $0487-020-401-8123 CAL PERS UAL PAYMENT $0 $0 $152,683 $0 $0 $0487-020-401-8212 ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT $0 $0 $19,247,683 $0 $0 $0TOTAL
050 FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES : 402 FIRE STATION BOND 2020A : 7000 CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $101,382 $2,500,000487-050-402-7210 FIRE STATION REMODEL & EXPANSION $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $101,382 $2,500,000TOTAL
050 FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES : 402 FIRE STATION BOND 2020A : 8000 OTHER CHARGES $121,874 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0487-050-402-8211 BOND INTEREST EXPENSE $63,453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0487-050-402-8212 ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT $130,977 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0487-050-402-8251 BOND ISSUANCE COSTS $316,304 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL
070 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT : 403 ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE DISTRICT : 6000 SERVICES AND S $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $40,000 $100,000487-070-403-6290 SVCS-PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $40,000 $100,000TOTAL
298
ACCOUNT NAME 2021 (A) 2022 (B) 2022 (A) 2023 (B) 2023 (E) 2024 (P)ACCOUNT OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE
173

CITY OF SANGER
299

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
300
ACCOUNT NAME 2020-21 (A) 2021-22 (B) 2021-22 (A) 2022-23 (B) 2022-23 (E) 2023-24 (P)ACCOUNT

CITY OF SANGER
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 PAGE
175

GENERAL
$0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,000296-070-401-7704 DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,000TOTAL

PARKS AND RECREATION
$0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $850,000251-070-101-7335 CESAR CHAVEZ PARK LIGHTING IMPROVEM $0 $85,000 $90,442 $0 $0 $0101-070-301-7413 COMMUNITY CENTER POOL REPAIR $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000296-070-401-7701 PARKS & REC MASTER PLAN UPDATE $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $275,000 $0221-070-311-7293 SOMERSET PARK - IMPACT FEES $0 $0 $0 $575,000 $0 $575,000296-070-401-7700 SOMERSET PARK LAND ACQUISITION $0 $85,000 $90,442 $1,080,000 $390,000 $1,540,000TOTAL

PUBLIC SAFETY
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000280-040-102-7642 DISPATCH CENTER $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $101,382 $2,500,000487-050-402-7210 FIRE STATION REMODEL & EXPANSION $510,306 $0 $10,492 $0 $0 $0221-070-313-7352 PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE DEPT SECURITY FEN $510,306 $0 $10,492 $2,500,000 $101,382 $3,500,000TOTAL

PUBLIC WORKS SEWER
$0 $0 $0 $825,000 $0 $506,300296-070-401-7703 CA QLTY SEWER TRUNK MAIN $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $10,000 $1,200,000296-070-401-7702 NEWMARK SEWER MAIN - NORTH TO MUS $0 $700,000 $0 $700,000 $100,000 $700,000621-070-501-7563 NORTH/GREENWOOD LIFT STATION RECON $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $15,000 $135,000216-070-101-7634 ROTARY & CHAVEZ BASIN SORM DRAIN IM $0 $700,000 $0 $2,875,000 $125,000 $2,541,300TOTAL

PUBLIC WORKS WATER
$208,715 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0611-070-401-7362 DBCP CARBON REPLC AT VAR LOC $0 $200,000 $0 $81,000 $200,000 $200,000611-070-401-7556 GAC $0 $150,000 $0 $4,100 $0 $4,100611-070-401-7555 KELLY BASIN GROUNDWATER RECHARGE $0 $2,640,110 $43,270 $2,640,100 $2,640,100 $2,640,100383-070-101-7562 NORTH SANGER GROUNDWATER RECHARG $2,955 $700,000 $66,850 $2,933,150 $100,000 $3,700,000298-070-102-7628 TOMBSTONE WATER CONNECTION PROJEC $1,388 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0212-070-101-7541 WATER STORAGE TANK OFFSITE IMPROVE $0 $0 $0 $882,000 $0 $882,000611-070-402-7291 WATER WELL- DBCP $0 $0 $0 $3,875,000 $100,000 $3,775,000204-070-101-7246 WELL #22 $0 $0 $331,082 $0 $0 $0296-070-401-7625 WELL 16
$5,851 $678,000 $54,327 $2,012,363 $649,900 $2,012,300296-070-401-7627 WELL 22 $0 $0 $0 $1,125,000 $0 $1,125,000611-070-402-7292 WELL DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION $0 $225,000 $0 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000611-070-401-7557 WELL REHABILITATION $0 $200,000 $0 $70,700 $0 $70,700611-070-401-7558 WEST WATER GROUNDWATER RECHARGE $218,909 $4,793,110 $495,529 $13,848,413 $4,075,000 $14,634,200TOTAL

TRANSPORTATION
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000212-070-101-7636 10TH ST- BETHEL TO POST; MAGNOLIA CT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000211-070-101-7553 14TH STREET - P ST TO SANGER AVE & EDG 301
ACCOUNT NAME 2020-21 (A) 2021-22 (B) 2021-22 (A) 2022-23 (B) 2022-23 (E) 2023-24 (P)ACCOUNT

CITY OF SANGER
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 PAGE
176
$0 $0 $0 $70,000 $70,000 $0207-070-101-7553 14TH-P TO SANGER & EDGAR-P TO ACADE $845 $47,400 $22,221 $0 $500 $0216-070-101-7624 20/21 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS $5,280 $545,000 $427,396 $0 $0 $0211-070-101-7539 2021 STREET SEALING PROJECT $22,110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0212-070-101-7539 2021 STREET SEALING PROJECT $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000 $0207-070-101-7554 2023 STREET SEALING PROJECT $0 $40,000 $30,164 $0 $0 $0216-070-101-7552 4TH - GREENWOOD TO WEST $0 $0 $0 $410,000 $50,000 $550,000212-070-101-7552 4TH STREET - GREENWOOD TO WEST $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $35,000 $425,000212-070-101-7586 5TH STREET - L STREET TO J STREET $0 $60,000 $28,862 $0 $0 $0216-070-101-7551 7TH - LYON TO HAWLEY & JENSEN TO WEB $0 $0 $0 $490,000 $50,000 $400,000212-070-101-7551 7TH - LYON TO HAWLEY; LYON AVE - JENSE $22,878 $595,800 $551,963 $0 $0 $0216-070-101-7542 8TH ST RECON - L ST TO FALLER AVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,000212-070-101-7635 8TH STREET - FALLER AVE TO QUALITY $34,952 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0215-070-101-7485 ACADEMY AVE-11TH ST TO NORTH AVE $122,753 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0217-070-101-7485 ACADEMY AVE-11TH ST TO NORTH AVE $4,944 $100,000 $93,572 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000207-070-101-7513 ADA IMPROVEMENTS-VARIOUS LOCATION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000298-070-103-7640 AHSC PROJECT
$0 $0 $0 $5,000 $3,500 $5,000207-070-101-7630 ALMOND AVE - BETHEL TO GREENWOOD $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $37,000 $40,000217-070-101-7630 ALMOND AVENUE - BETHEL TO GREENWO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000207-070-101-7587 ANNADALE AVENUE - BETHEL AVE TO POST $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $0212-070-101-7587 ANNADALE AVENUE - BETHEL AVE TO POST $636,047 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0217-070-101-7533 ATP-ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ACCESS PR ($1,052) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0212-070-101-7522 ATP-SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL $1,052 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0217-070-101-7522 ATP-SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL $0 $0 $0 $3,500 $2,500 $2,000207-070-101-7632 BETHEL AND ALMOND TRAFFIC SIGNAL $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000217-070-101-7632 BETHEL AND ALMOND TRAFFIC SIGNAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000212-070-101-7641 BETHEL AND ANNADALE TRAFFIC SIGNAL $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $40,000 $300,000217-070-101-7629 BETHEL AVE - CITY LIMITS TO JENNI AVE $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $3,500 $40,000207-070-101-7629 BETHEL AVENUE - CITY LIMITS TO JENNI AV $970,436 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0217-070-101-7518 BETHEL OVERLAY/WIDENING-ANNADALE/J $840 $344,000 $94,279 $0 $0 $0207-070-101-7519 BETHEL SIDEWALK/BIKE LANES-NORTH-AN $107,083 $380,152 $424,662 $0 $0 $0217-070-101-7519 BETHEL SIDEWALK/BIKE LANES-NORTH-AN $237,920 $175,000 $202,070 $0 $0 $0221-070-304-7519 BETHEL SIDEWALK/BIKE LANES-NORTH-AN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000212-070-101-7639 BREHLER AVE - 7TH TO 9TH; WEBSTER AVE $985,234 $0 $2,026 $0 $0 $0217-070-101-7512 BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PR $0 $29,500 $23,530 $6,000 $6,000 $0216-070-101-7629 CALIFORNIA AVE ALIGNMENT STUDY $19,830 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0212-070-101-7440 CENTRAL AVE PAVEMENT REPAIR $57,617 $341,500 $425,697 $0 $0 $0211-070-101-7543 CHERRY AVE RECONST - BETHEL TO GREEN $0 $42,400 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $0212-070-101-7437 CMAQ REGIONAL BID SIDEWALK PROJECT $6,193 $236,600 $81,283 $195,000 $195,000 $0217-070-101-7437 CMAQ REGIONAL BID SIDEWALK PROJECT $0 $44,800 $0 $0 $0 $0207-070-101-7527 CMAQ SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE PROJECT $0 $185,300 $83,156 $120,000 $120,000 $0217-070-101-7527 CMAQ SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE PROJECT $620,126 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0217-070-101-7436 FALLER AVENUE OVERLAY-CHURCH TO FLO $0 $0 $0 $406,000 $0 $406,000202-070-101-7442 FOWLER TRAIL & BETHEL/CHURCH BIKE & $12,449 $192,000 $25,035 $765,000 $65,000 $700,000217-070-101-7442 FOWLER TRAIL & BETHEL/CHURCH BIKE & 302
ACCOUNT NAME 2020-21 (A) 2021-22 (B) 2021-22 (A) 2022-23 (B) 2022-23 (E) 2023-24 (P)ACCOUNT

CITY OF SANGER
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 PAGE
177
$0 $29,400 $0 $0 $0 $0212-070-101-7435 GREENWOOD AVE RECONST - JENSEN TO C $305,423 $226,800 $366,251 $0 $0 $0217-070-101-7435 GREENWOOD AVE RECONST - JENSEN TO C $0 $40,000 $34,822 $375,000 $50,000 $425,000216-070-101-7550 HILL RECON - CHRUCH TO WEST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,150207-070-101-7643 HSIP CYCLE 11 PROJECT - JENSEN AVE PED $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,400217-070-101-7643 HSIP CYCLE 11 PROJECT - JENSEN AVE PED $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000212-070-101-7637 INDUSTRIAL AVE OVERLAY - END TO NORT $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $0211-070-101-7585 J ST - ANNADALE TO EDGAR AVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000207-070-101-7585 J STREET - ANNADALE TO EDGAR AVE $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $25,000 $36,000217-070-101-7631 JENSEN AND DIANOLA TRAFFIC SCHOOL $0 $0 $0 $3,500 $2,500 $4,000207-070-101-7631 JENSEN AND INDIANOLA TRAFFIC SIGNAL $10,694 $669,000 $8,919 $670,000 $30,000 $665,000207-070-101-7535 K ST RECN-ANNADALE/EDGAR & ALMOND/ $26,929 $679,900 $674,679 $0 $0 $0212-070-101-7536 K ST RECON - 5TH ST TO 10TH ST $10,943 $135,000 $129,966 $0 $0 $0211-070-101-7538 LYON AVE RECON - 9TH ST TO WEBSTER AV $8,992 $15,000 $15,610 $15,000 $16,500 $25,000216-070-101-7505 MS4 PERMITTING $26,119 $930,000 $129,353 $1,015,000 $990,000 $0212-070-101-7540 N ST RECON - 5TH ST TO 9TH ST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000212-070-101-7638 N STREET- 9TH TO ANNADALE $0 $33,000 $0 $120,900 $120,900 $0211-070-101-7249 NORTH AVE RECON - ACADEMY TO FALLER $30,330 $254,800 $58,842 $859,600 $859,600 $0217-070-101-7249 NORTH AVE RECON - ACADEMY TO FALLER $0 $56,000 $0 $412,500 $393,694 $0211-070-101-7441 O ST RECON - 10TH TO NORTH $53,868 $230,300 $48,947 $893,000 $893,000 $0217-070-101-7441 O ST RECON - 10TH TO NORTH $2,334 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0216-070-101-7443 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY $135,552 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0221-070-303-7400 REIMBURSEMENT TRACT 5383 $111,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0221-070-304-7400 REIMBURSEMENT TRACT 5383 $34,693 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0221-070-307-7400 REIMBURSEMENT TRACT 5383 $9,945 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0216-070-101-7625 SANGER UTILITY PLAT UPDATES $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $15,000 $0212-070-101-7527 SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE PROJECT $71,724 $60,000 $33,653 $60,000 $71,000 $60,000212-070-101-7371 SIDEWALK REPAIR/REPLAC AT VAR LOCATI $0 $5,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $15,000216-070-101-7626 STANDARD PLAN UPDATES $2,163 $20,000 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000212-070-101-7391 STREET PROJECTS VARIOUS LOCATIONS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000211-070-101-7554 STREET SEALING PROJECT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000207-070-101-7591 WEST AVENUE - 7TH STREET TO 3RD STREE $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $0211-070-101-7591 WEST AVENUE - 7TH STREET TO 3RD STREE $4,708,616 $6,953,652 $4,016,957 $7,516,000 $4,525,194 $6,884,550TOTAL 303

HARRISON AVE
OAK CT
HAW
LEYAVE

ATCHISONCT

RECREATION
AVE
TAIT
AVE

EIGHTH ST

ALMOND AVE

WALTON AVE
GEORG
E AVE

MOIR AVE

FIFTH ST
N ST
CLARE
M

ONT AVE

LORENA AVE

TAMARACK AVE
HUM
E
DR

RECREATION
CIR

CHERRY AVE
BENN
ETT
AVE

NINTH ST
IN
DIANOL
A AVE

TAMRACK AVE

FLORENCE CT

LYNN CT
SAN
TA
BA

RBARA AV
E

SANTA MONICA AVE RECREATION

CTGLENVIEW AVE

THIRTEENTH ST
FALLER
CIR

FOURTEENTH ST

CHURCH AVE

FALLER CT

HILL AVE
SIMONE
WAY

HANNAH AVE
GRA
CE
AV
E

TUCKER AVE

HARRIET
TAVE

FOREST LN

SECOND ST

FAIRBANKS AVE

PINEWOOD AVE

BREHLER AVE

SPENCER
AVE
RICH

ARD AVE
VINE
ST

BUCK WAY
W
ATH
EN
AV
E
GREENW

OOD AVE

SANDRA CT

CANAL D
R

CATHERINE AVE
QU

ALITY A
VE

MYRTLE AVE

MAGNOLIA CT

CAMELIA AVE

MAGNOLIA AVE

NORTH AVE
SUSAN
AVE

HOAG AVE
KISTER
AVE

LIME AVE

WEBSTER AVE

HUNTER AVE

PEARL AVE

LYON AVE

DAISY LANE AVE
SANTA
CRUZ

ACACIA CT

ATCHISON
AVE

WEST AVE

PALM AVE
COTTLE
AVE
RAWS
O
N AVE

DEWITT AVE
FIR
AVE

VIRGINIA
AVE

MEIRWOODAVE

CYPRESS AVE

ANNADALE AVE

EDGAR AVE
M

ADROS AV
E

TENTH ST

ELEVENTH
ST

FOURTH ST

SEVENTH ST

JENSEN AVE

SANGER AVE
BIRCH
AVE

TWELFTH ST
REAGAN
AVE

REDWOOD AVE

CASTY CT

FENMORE AVE SKYLAR
AVE

BARBARA AVE

LILY AVE

ROSEWOOD AVE
SANDRA

AVE REBECA
AVE
O ST
L ST

FALLER AVE
J ST

OATMAN AVE

I STK ST
P ST
Q ST
CAROL
AVE

ALMOND/RICHARD ALYDALTON
AVE

VINE AVE

THIRD ST

ACACIA AVE

HOLT AVE

FINK AVE

GLORIA AVE

FLORENCE
AVE

ORCHID AVE

NILE AVE

OLIVE AVE

OAK AVE

MARY AVE

GEARY AVE

ACADEMYAVE

JENNI AVE

JAMES AVE

DIAMOND AVE

ELIZABETH
AVE

EASTWOOD
AVE
WAL
NUTAVE

STERLING AVE

MORTON AVE

BETHEL/LILY
ALY

SIXTH ST

METZLER DR

JEFF ERS
ON
W
AY

GRIFFIN AVE

SEGURA AVE

HEIDI AVE

PARK AVE
RAIN
BOW
AVE

HUME RD

POST AVE

SEQUOIA AVE

SWITCH AVE
ACAC
IADR
M
ILLW
OOD DR

BETHEL AVE

MADSEN AVE

LEWIS LN

CIRCL E
DR

SWAN AVE

NEWMARK AVE

MUSCAT AVE

CALIFORNIA AVE
15 6
12 18
22 13
20 8
11 24
7 16
17 14
21 23
10 9
25 19
28 26
29 271
2 3
4 5
Document Path: G:\Sanger\ArcPro\Sanger_\Sanger_.aprx

1. Jensen Ave and
Indianola Ave
Traffic Signal

2. Bethel Ave and
Almond Ave Traffic
Signal

3. Well 22

4. Well 19

5. North and
Greenwood Sewer
Lift Station
Reconstruction

6. K St - Annadale
Ave to Edgar Ave
& Almond - K st to
Faller Ave

7. 7th Street -
Lyon Ave to
Hawley Ave; Lyon
Ave Jensen Ave to
Webster Ave

8. 4th St -
Greenwood Ave to
West Ave

9. Almond Ave
Reconstruction -
Bethel Ave to
Greenwood Ave

10. West Ave - 7th
St to 3rd St

11. J St -
Annadale Ave to
Edgar Ave

12. 5th St - L St to
J St

13. Annadale Ave
- Bethel Ave to
Post Ave

14. 8th St - Faller
Ave to Quality Ave

15. 10th St -
Bethel Ave to Post
Ave; Magnolia Ave
- Bethel Ave to
Brehler Ave;
Brehler Ave - 10th
St to Annadale
Ave

16. Industrial Ave
Overlay - End to
North Ave

17. N St - 9th St to
Annadale Ave

18. Brehler Ave -
7th St to 9th St;
Webster Ave - End
to 130' East of
Brehler Ave

19. Bethel Ave
Reconstruction -
Jensen Ave to City
Limits

20. AHSC Public
Improvements

21. Fowler Switch
Canal Bicycle/
Pedestrian Trail
Improvements -
Bethel to Jensen

22. Hill Ave -
Church Ave to
Canal Dr; Church
Ave - West Ave to
O St; West Ave -
Church Ave to
Canal Dr

23. Newmark
Avenue 24" -
North Ave to
Muscat Alignment

24. 14th St - P St
to Sanger Ave;
Edgar Ave - P St
to Academy Ave

25. HSIP Cycle 11
Project

26. Cesar Chavez
Park Lighting
Project

27. Fire Station
Remodel

28. North Sanger
Groundwater
Recharge Project

29. Southwest
Regional Park
Land Aquisition
0 1,400 2,800
Feet
FY 23/24 Capital
Improvement Projects
304

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

MEASURE S SPENDING PLAN
305

CITY OF SANGER
FY 2023-2024 BUDGET
MEASURE S : SPENDING PLAN THROUGH SUNSET YEAR
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
FUNDS & ACCOUNTS FY 2022 (A) FY 2023 (B) FY 2023 (E) FY 2024 (P) FY 2025 (P) FY 2026 (P) FY 2027 (P) FY 2028 (P) [208] MEASURE S DISTRICT SALES TAX
[208]INFLOWS INFLOWS 3,450,272 3,246,500 3,246,500 3,072,100 3,192,500 3,311,600 3,425,400 3,637,100 [208]OUTFLOWS OUTFLOWS 2,912,953 4,070,674 3,972,790 3,334,200 3,272,200 3,940,500 4,333,500 3,889,900 NET CHANGE 537,319 (824,174) (726,290) (262,100) (79,700) (628,900) (908,100) (252,800) End Fund Balance 2,857,890 2,033,716 2,131,600 1,869,500 1,789,800 1,160,900 252,800 - [208] MEASURE S DISTRICT SALES TAX : INFLOWS : TAXES 208-040-101-4105 SALES TAX 3,449,794 3,240,200 3,240,200 3,065,600 3,185,800 3,304,700 3,418,200 3,629,600 TOTAL : TAXES 3,449,794 3,240,200 3,240,200 3,065,600 3,185,800 3,304,700 3,418,200 3,629,600 [208] MEASURE S DISTRICT SALES TAX : INFLOWS : USES OF MONEY & PROPERTY 208-040-101-4801 INTEREST INCOME 6,604 3,800 3,800 3,900 4,000 4,100 4,300 4,500 208-040-101-4802 UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) INVESTMENTS (6,125) 2,500 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 208-050-101-4960 PROCEEDS ON NOTES AND LOANS - - - - - - - - TOTAL : USES OF MONEY & PROPERTY 478 6,300 6,300 6,500 6,700 6,900 7,200 7,500 [208] MEASURE S DISTRICT SALES TAX : OUTFLOWS : POLICE : PERSONNEL 208-040-101-5110 DIRECT LABOR-REGULAR 508,623 694,437 486,463 572,200 603,700 633,900 668,800 705,600 208-040-101-5111 MEAS S 206,400 206,400 206,400 206,400 206,400 206,400 206,400 206,400 208-040-101-5120 DIRECT LABOR-TEMPORARY 250 600 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 208-040-101-5130 OVERTIME 98,436 78,100 100,000 82,100 86,700 91,100 96,200 101,500 208-040-101-5160 VACATION LEAVE BUY BACK 4,189 9,400 9,400 9,900 10,500 11,100 11,800 12,500 208-040-101-5170 OTHER LEAVE BUY BACK 61,384 57,300 57,300 60,200 63,600 66,800 70,500 74,400 208-040-101-5210 PERS EXPENSE 97,953 103,700 49,365 64,100 67,700 71,100 75,100 79,300 208-040-101-5219 PERS OBLIGATION BOND - 37,600 37,600 80,600 85,100 89,400 94,400 99,600 208-040-101-5220 SOCIAL SECURITY 51,745 41,400 47,850 55,500 58,600 61,600 65,000 68,600 208-040-101-5310 HEALTH INSURANCE 114,823 176,500 140,000 165,100 174,200 183,000 193,100 203,800 208-040-101-5320 WORKERS COMPENSATION 28,868 28,400 88,045 76,400 80,700 84,800 89,500 94,500 208-040-101-5340 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 273 200 245 300 400 500 600 700 208-040-101-5350 FITNESS PROGRAM 182 200 200 300 400 500 600 700 208-040-101-5411 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 716 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 208-040-101-5420 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 8,885 5,400 10,500 10,500 11,100 11,700 12,400 13,100 TOTAL : PERSONNEL 1,182,727 1,441,137 1,235,468 1,385,800 1,451,500 1,514,500 1,587,200 1,663,700 5/25/2023
306

CITY OF SANGER
FY 2023-2024 BUDGET
MEASURE S : SPENDING PLAN THROUGH SUNSET YEAR
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
FUNDS & ACCOUNTS FY 2022 (A) FY 2023 (B) FY 2023 (E) FY 2024 (P) FY 2025 (P) FY 2026 (P) FY 2027 (P) FY 2028 (P) [208] MEASURE S DISTRICT SALES TAX : OUTFLOWS : POLICE : OPERATIONS 208-040-101-6123 SUPPLIES-SAFETY 15,588 40,000 40,000 42,000 44,100 46,400 48,800 51,300 208-040-101-6124 SUPPLIES-OTHER 5,722 14,300 14,300 15,100 15,900 16,700 17,600 18,500 208-040-101-6126 SUPPLIES-RESERVE PROGRAM 935 10,000 1,000 10,500 11,100 11,700 12,300 13,000 208-040-101-6127 SUPPLIES-VOLUNTEER PROGRAM - 2,500 - 2,700 2,900 3,100 3,300 3,500 208-040-101-6147 PATROL CAR UNIT EQUIPMENT 98 82,000 82,000 20,100 21,200 22,300 23,500 24,700 208-040-101-6240 SVCS-LEGAL COUNSEL - - - - - - - - 208-040-101-6245 GANG INTERVENTION/PREVENTION 150,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 208-040-101-6290 SVCS-PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,665 17,000 - 17,900 18,800 19,800 20,800 21,900 208-040-101-6410 LEGAL ADVERTISING - - - - - - - - 208-040-101-6420 PRINTING & BINDING 468 400 400 500 600 700 800 900 208-040-101-6431 GENERAL LIABILITY PREMIUMS 10,600 11,200 11,200 11,800 12,400 13,000 13,000 13,000 208-040-101-6432 PROPERTY PREMIUMS 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 208-040-101-6437 HEALTH INSURANCE EXPENSE 300 400 400 500 600 700 800 900 208-040-101-6438 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 208-040-101-6445 DISABILITY INSURANCE 300 300 300 400 500 600 700 800 208-040-101-6448 RISK MGT ADMIN 900 900 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 208-040-101-6449 ERMA PERSONNEL INSURANCE 4,400 4,600 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 6,100 208-040-101-6455 LOW/HIGH VEHICLE INSURANCE 1,800 1,900 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,300 2,500 2,700 208-040-101-6610 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS - 130,000 80,000 50,000 - - - - 208-040-101-6730 TRAINING/WORKSHOPS/MEETINGS 6,318 22,100 15,000 12,800 15,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 208-040-101-6750 P.O.S.T. TRAINING 21,507 18,000 18,000 20,000 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 208-040-101-6755 K-9 TRAINING 12,403 7,500 8,000 7,900 8,300 8,800 9,300 9,800 208-040-101-8321 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2,912 12,600 30,000 13,300 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 208-040-101-8322 COMPUTER HARDWARE - - - 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 TOTAL : OPERATIONS 242,515 478,300 410,600 349,200 316,800 332,000 347,900 364,100 [208] MEASURE S DISTRICT SALES TAX : OUTFLOWS : POLICE : CAPITAL OUTLAY 208-040-101-7230 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 32,950 18,600 18,600 20,000 21,000 23,000 25,000 30,000 208-040-101-7231 FIREARM REPLACEMENT - 75,000 75,000 - - - - - 208-040-101-7239 PATROL VEHICLES 71,510 145,000 197,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 - 208-040-101-7241 SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS 30,167 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 208-040-101-7242 RADIOS - 11,200 11,200 - - - - - 208-040-101-7243 TASERS 37,768 19,000 19,555 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 208-040-101-7244 MDC 45,502 11,000 11,000 - - - - - 208-040-101-7245 BODY WORN CAMERAS & STORAGE 58,547 72,200 72,200 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 TOTAL : CAPITAL OUTLAY 276,445 397,000 449,555 289,000 290,000 292,000 294,000 154,000 5/25/2023
307

CITY OF SANGER
FY 2023-2024 BUDGET
MEASURE S : SPENDING PLAN THROUGH SUNSET YEAR
Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
FUNDS & ACCOUNTS FY 2022 (A) FY 2023 (B) FY 2023 (E) FY 2024 (P) FY 2025 (P) FY 2026 (P) FY 2027 (P) FY 2028 (P) [208] MEASURE S DISTRICT SALES TAX : OUTFLOWS : FIRE & EMS : PERSONNEL 208-050-101-5110 DIRECT LABOR-REGULAR 320,077 517,337 450,476 401,000 423,100 444,300 468,800 494,600 208-050-101-5111 MEAS S 171,000 171,000 171,000 171,000 171,000 171,000 171,000 171,000 208-050-101-5120 DIRECT LABOR-TEMPORARY 250 600 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 208-050-101-5130 OVERTIME 73,436 45,300 72,051 47,600 50,300 52,900 55,900 59,000 208-050-101-5140 FLSA & ACTING PAY 1,865 4,900 4,238 5,200 5,500 5,800 6,200 6,600 208-050-101-5160 VACATION LEAVE BUY BACK 981 4,900 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 6,200 6,600 208-050-101-5170 OTHER LEAVE BUY BACK 992 2,800 1,000 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 208-050-101-5210 PERS EXPENSE 82,213 57,300 66,712 91,600 96,700 101,600 107,200 113,100 208-050-101-5219 PERS OBLIGATION BOND - 31,500 31,500 56,500 59,700 62,700 66,200 69,900 208-050-101-5220 SOCIAL SECURITY 28,985 27,900 38,105 35,400 37,400 39,300 41,500 43,800 208-050-101-5310 HEALTH INSURANCE 30,887 78,700 168,000 92,100 97,200 102,100 107,800 113,800 208-050-101-5320 WORKERS COMPENSATION 31,207 20,800 90,505 48,800 51,500 54,100 57,100 60,300 208-050-101-5340 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 224 100 552 200 300 400 500 600 208-050-101-5350 FITNESS PROGRAM 150 100 334 300 400 500 600 700 208-050-101-5420 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,500 2,000 4,500 1,800 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 TOTAL : PERSONNEL 746,768 965,237 1,104,473 960,400 1,006,100 1,048,300 1,097,100 1,148,400 [208] MEASURE S DISTRICT SALES TAX : OUTFLOWS : FIRE & EMS : OPERATIONS 208-050-101-6124 SUPPLIES-OTHER 29,233 20,800 20,800 21,900 23,000 24,200 25,500 26,800 208-050-101-6130 UNIFORM EXPENSE 14,562 1,900 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,300 2,500 2,700 208-050-101-6240 SVCS-LEGAL COUNSEL - - - - - - - - 208-050-101-6290 SVCS-PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 82 4,300 200 4,600 4,900 5,200 5,500 5,800 208-050-101-6410 LEGAL ADVERTISING - - - - - - - - 208-050-101-6420 PRINTING & BINDING 468 400 400 500 600 700 800 900 208-050-101-6431 GENERAL LIABILITY PREMIUMS 4,500 4,700 4,700 5,000 5,300 5,600 5,900 6,200 208-050-101-6432 PROPERTY PREMIUMS 2,000 2,100 2,100 2,300 2,500 2,700 2,900 3,100 208-050-101-6437 HEALTH INSURANCE EXPENSE 200 200 200 300 400 500 600 700 208-050-101-6438 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 400 400 400 500 600 700 800 900 208-050-101-6445 DISABILITY INSURANCE 100 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 208-050-101-6448 RISK MGT ADMIN 600 600 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 208-050-101-6449 ERMA PERSONNEL INSURANCE 2,800 3,000 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 208-050-101-6455 LOW/HIGH VEHICLE INSURANCE 1,300 1,400 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 208-050-101-6730 TRAINING/WORKSHOPS/MEETINGS 25,375 25,200 25,200 25,000 25,000 25,000 27,500 27,500 208-050-101-8321 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2,911 12,600 5,094 13,300 14,000 14,700 15,500 16,300 208-050-101-8322 COMPUTER HARDWARE - 5,000 2,500 10,000 13,000 10,000 13,000 20,000 208-050-101-8350 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE CHARGES - - - 7,800 8,000 8,200 8,700 9,200 TOTAL : OPERATIONS 84,530 82,700 68,594 98,800 105,500 106,400 116,300 127,700 5/25/2023
308

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE
184

DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULES
310

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE
185
ENTITY Sanger Financing Authority ENTITY Sanger Financing Authority ENTITY Sanger Financing Authority SERIES REPLACED NEW SERIES REPLACED 2020 Series A SERIES REPLACED 2013 Series PROJECT Pension Unfunded Accrued Liabilities PROJECT Remodel and Expansion of Fire Station PROJECT Roof, HVAC, Lighting, Pool Pump CURRENT BALANCE 18,500,000 CURRENT BALANCE 7,190,000 CURRENT BALANCE 1,349,000 INTEREST RATE 2.33% INTEREST RATE 3.97% INTEREST RATE 2.65% PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT 712-090-401-8210 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT 101-050-402-8210 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT 101-090-301-8210 INTEREST ACCOUNT 712-090-401-8211 INTEREST ACCOUNT 101-050-402-8211 INTEREST ACCOUNT 101-090-301-8211 Period
Ending Principal Interest Debt Service
Annual Debt
Service Period Ending Principal Interest Debt Service
Annual Debt
Service
Period
Ending Principal Interest Debt Service
Annual Debt
Service
1/15/2022 168,725.30 168,725.30 168,725.30 2/1/2022 135,000 148,225.00 283,225.00 283,225.00 6/15/2022 39,000 13,103.46 52,103.46 52,103.46 7/15/2022 950,000 216,932.53 1,166,932.53 8/1/2022 145,525.00 145,525.00 12/15/2022 22,490.00 22,490.00 1/15/2023 215,241.53 215,241.53 1,382,174.06 2/1/2023 140,000 145,525.00 285,525.00 431,050.00 6/15/2023 35,000 22,490.00 57,490.00 79,980.00 7/15/2023 955,000 215,241.53 1,170,241.53 8/1/2023 142,725.00 142,725.00 12/15/2023 17,874.25 17,874.25 1/15/2024 213,064.13 213,064.13 1,383,305.66 2/1/2024 145,000 142,725.00 287,725.00 430,450.00 6/15/2024 53,000 17,874.25 70,874.25 88,748.50 7/15/2024 960,000 213,064.13 1,173,064.13 8/1/2024 139,825.00 139,825.00 12/15/2024 17,172.00 17,172.00 1/15/2025 209,512.13 209,512.13 1,382,576.26 2/1/2025 150,000 139,825.00 289,825.00 429,650.00 6/15/2025 53,000 17,172.00 70,172.00 87,344.00 7/15/2025 960,000 209,512.13 1,169,512.13 8/1/2025 136,825.00 136,825.00 12/15/2025 16,469.75 16,469.75 1/15/2026 204,419.33 204,419.33 1,373,931.46 2/1/2026 155,000 136,825.00 291,825.00 428,650.00 6/15/2026 53,000 16,469.75 69,469.75 85,939.50 7/15/2026 980,000 204,419.33 1,184,419.33 8/1/2026 133,725.00 133,725.00 12/15/2026 15,767.50 15,767.50 1/15/2027 197,848.44 197,848.44 1,382,267.77 2/1/2027 165,000 133,725.00 298,725.00 432,450.00 6/15/2027 53,000 15,767.50 68,767.50 84,535.00 7/15/2027 995,000 197,848.44 1,192,848.44 8/1/2027 130,425.00 130,425.00 12/15/2027 15,065.25 15,065.25 1/15/2028 189,684.46 189,684.46 1,382,532.90 2/1/2028 170,000 130,425.00 300,425.00 430,850.00 6/15/2028 58,000 15,065.25 73,065.25 88,130.50 7/15/2028 1,010,000 189,684.46 1,199,684.46 8/1/2028 127,025.00 127,025.00 12/15/2028 14,296.75 14,296.75 1/15/2029 180,387.40 180,387.40 1,380,071.86 2/1/2029 175,000 127,025.00 302,025.00 429,050.00 6/15/2029 58,000 14,296.75 72,296.75 86,593.50 7/15/2029 1,030,000 180,387.40 1,210,387.40 8/1/2029 123,525.00 123,525.00 12/15/2029 13,528.25 13,528.25 1/15/2030 170,025.60 170,025.60 1,380,413.00 2/1/2030 185,000 123,525.00 308,525.00 432,050.00 6/15/2030 62,000 13,528.25 75,528.25 89,056.50 7/15/2030 1,050,000 170,025.60 1,220,025.60 8/1/2030 119,825.00 119,825.00 12/15/2030 12,706.75 12,706.75 1/15/2031 158,622.60 158,622.60 1,378,648.20 2/1/2031 190,000 119,825.00 309,825.00 429,650.00 6/15/2031 62,000 12,706.75 74,706.75 87,413.50 7/15/2031 1,075,000 158,622.60 1,233,622.60 8/1/2031 116,025.00 116,025.00 12/15/2031 11,885.25 11,885.25 1/15/2032 146,034.35 146,034.35 1,379,656.95 2/1/2032 200,000 116,025.00 316,025.00 432,050.00 6/15/2032 61,000 11,885.25 72,885.25 84,770.50 7/15/2032 1,105,000 146,034.35 1,251,034.35 8/1/2032 112,025.00 112,025.00 12/15/2032 11,077.00 11,077.00 1/15/2033 131,989.80 131,989.80 1,383,024.15 2/1/2033 205,000 112,025.00 317,025.00 429,050.00 6/15/2033 65,000 11,077.00 76,077.00 87,154.00 7/15/2033 1,135,000 131,989.80 1,266,989.80 8/1/2033 107,925.00 107,925.00 12/15/2033 10,215.75 10,215.75 1/15/2034 114,839.95 114,839.95 1,381,829.75 2/1/2034 215,000 107,925.00 322,925.00 430,850.00 6/15/2034 69,000 10,215.75 79,215.75 89,431.50 7/15/2034 1,165,000 114,839.95 1,279,839.95 8/1/2034 104,700.00 104,700.00 12/15/2034 9,301.50 9,301.50 1/15/2035 97,236.80 97,236.80 1,377,076.75 2/1/2035 220,000 104,700.00 324,700.00 429,400.00 6/15/2035 72,000 9,301.50 81,301.50 90,603.00 7/15/2035 1,200,000 97,236.80 1,297,236.80 8/1/2035 100,300.00 100,300.00 12/15/2035 8,347.50 8,347.50 1/15/2036 79,104.80 79,104.80 1,376,341.60 2/1/2036 230,000 100,300.00 330,300.00 430,600.00 6/15/2036 71,000 8,347.50 79,347.50 87,695.00 7/15/2036 910,000 79,104.80 989,104.80 8/1/2036 95,700.00 95,700.00 12/15/2036 7,406.75 7,406.75 1/15/2037 64,353.70 64,353.70 1,053,458.50 2/1/2037 240,000 95,700.00 335,700.00 431,400.00 6/15/2037 75,000 7,406.75 82,406.75 89,813.50 7/15/2037 945,000 64,353.70 1,009,353.70 8/1/2037 90,900.00 90,900.00 12/15/2037 6,413.00 6,413.00 1/15/2038 49,035.25 49,035.25 1,058,388.95 2/1/2038 250,000 90,900.00 340,900.00 431,800.00 6/15/2038 74,000 6,413.00 80,413.00 86,826.00 7/15/2038 975,000 49,035.25 1,024,035.25 8/1/2038 85,900.00 85,900.00 12/15/2038 5,432.50 5,432.50 1/15/2039 33,230.50 33,230.50 1,057,265.75 2/1/2039 260,000 85,900.00 345,900.00 431,800.00 6/15/2039 77,000 5,432.50 82,432.50 87,865.00 7/15/2039 1,010,000 33,230.50 1,043,230.50 8/1/2039 80,700.00 80,700.00 12/15/2039 4,412.25 4,412.25 1/15/2040 16,858.40 16,858.40 1,060,088.90 2/1/2040 270,000 80,700.00 350,700.00 431,400.00 6/15/2040 80,000 4,412.25 84,412.25 88,824.50 7/15/2040 1,040,000 16,858.40 1,056,858.40 8/1/2040 75,300.00 75,300.00 12/15/2040 3,352.25 3,352.25 1/15/2041 1,056,858.40 2/1/2041 280,000 75,300.00 355,300.00 430,600.00 6/15/2041 83,000 3,352.25 86,352.25 89,704.50 19,450,000 5,328,636.17 24,778,636.17 24,778,636.17 8/1/2041 69,700.00 69,700.00 12/15/2041 2,252.50 2,252.50 2/1/2042 290,000 69,700.00 359,700.00 429,400.00 6/15/2042 86,000 2,252.50 88,252.50 90,505.00 8/1/2042 63,900.00 63,900.00 12/15/2042 1,113.00 1,113.00 2/1/2043 300,000 63,900.00 363,900.00 427,800.00 6/15/2043 84,000 1,113.00 85,113.00 86,226.00 8/1/2043 57,900.00 57,900.00 1,423,000 466,262.96 1,889,262.96 1,889,262.96 2/1/2044 315,000 57,900.00 372,900.00 430,800.00
8/1/2044 51,600.00 51,600.00 Assumes tax-exempt conversion on June 15, 2023. 2/1/2045 325,000 51,600.00 376,600.00 428,200.00
8/1/2045 45,100.00 45,100.00
2/1/2046 340,000 45,100.00 385,100.00 430,200.00
8/1/2046 38,300.00 38,300.00
2/1/2047 355,000 38,300.00 393,300.00 431,600.00
8/1/2047 31,200.00 31,200.00
2/1/2048 370,000 31,200.00 401,200.00 432,400.00
8/1/2048 23,800.00 23,800.00
2/1/2049 380,000 23,800.00 403,800.00 427,600.00
8/1/2049 16,200.00 16,200.00
2/1/2050 395,000 16,200.00 411,200.00 427,400.00
8/1/2050 8,300.00 8,300.00
2/1/2051 415,000 8,300.00 423,300.00 431,600.00
7,465,000 5,298,025 12,763,025 12,763,025

SANGER FINANCING AUTHORITY OBLIGATIONS
2021 Pension Obligation Bonds Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2022A 311

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE
186
ENTITY Sanger Financing Authority ENTITY Sanger Financing Authority ENTITY Sanger Financing Authority SERIES REPLACED 2014 Series/Refund 2006 Bonds SERIES REPLACED 2013 Series SERIES REPLACED 2013 Series PROJECT Wastewater Treatment Plant PROJECT Solar, Pumps, Conrols, Lighting, and HVAC PROJECT Water meters and leak detectors CURRENT BALANCE 12,125,000 CURRENT BALANCE 6,352,000 CURRENT BALANCE 3,769,000 INTEREST RATE 2.15% INTEREST RATE 2.96% INTEREST RATE 3.23% PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT 621-070-501-8220 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT 621-070-501-8210 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT 611-070-401-8210 INTEREST ACCOUNT 621-070-501-8221 INTEREST ACCOUNT 621-070-501-8211 INTEREST ACCOUNT 611-070-401-8211 Period
Ending Principal Interest Debt Service
Annual Debt
Service
Period
Ending Principal Interest Debt Service
Annual Debt
Service Period Ending Principal Interest Debt Service
Annual Debt
Service
6/15/2022 775,000 90,635.06 865,635.06 865,635.06 12/15/2022 151,795.80 151,795.80 12/15/2022 90,199.95 90,199.95 12/15/2022 189,980.00 189,980.00 6/15/2023 135,000 131,361.75 266,361.75 418,157.55 6/15/2023 48,000 78,057.65 126,057.65 216,257.60 6/15/2023 755,000 189,980.00 944,980.00 1,134,960.00 12/15/2023 94,009.60 94,009.60 12/15/2023 60,831.66 60,831.66 12/15/2023 178,843.75 178,843.75 6/15/2024 189,000 94,009.60 283,009.60 377,019.20 6/15/2024 119,000 60,831.66 179,831.66 240,663.32 6/15/2024 780,000 178,843.75 958,843.75 1,137,687.50 12/15/2024 91,212.40 91,212.40 12/15/2024 58,911.00 58,911.00 12/15/2024 121,958.75 121,958.75 6/15/2025 195,000 91,212.40 286,212.40 377,424.80 6/15/2025 120,000 58,911.00 178,911.00 237,822.00 6/15/2025 840,000 121,958.75 961,958.75 1,083,917.50 12/15/2025 88,326.40 88,326.40 12/15/2025 56,974.20 56,974.20 12/15/2025 112,928.75 112,928.75 6/15/2026 244,000 88,326.40 332,326.40 420,652.80 6/15/2026 125,000 56,974.20 181,974.20 238,948.40 6/15/2026 855,000 112,928.75 967,928.75 1,080,857.50 12/15/2026 84,715.20 84,715.20 12/15/2026 54,956.70 54,956.70 12/15/2026 103,737.50 103,737.50 6/15/2027 254,000 84,715.20 338,715.20 423,430.40 6/15/2027 130,000 54,956.70 184,956.70 239,913.40 6/15/2027 875,000 103,737.50 978,737.50 1,082,475.00 12/15/2027 80,956.00 80,956.00 12/15/2027 52,858.50 52,858.50 12/15/2027 94,331.25 94,331.25 6/15/2028 261,000 80,956.00 341,956.00 422,912.00 6/15/2028 136,000 52,858.50 188,858.50 241,717.00 6/15/2028 895,000 94,331.25 989,331.25 1,083,662.50 12/15/2028 77,093.20 77,093.20 12/15/2028 50,663.46 50,663.46 12/15/2028 84,710.00 84,710.00 6/15/2029 277,000 77,093.20 354,093.20 431,186.40 6/15/2029 140,000 50,663.46 190,663.46 241,326.92 6/15/2029 915,000 84,710.00 999,710.00 1,084,420.00 12/15/2029 72,993.60 72,993.60 12/15/2029 48,403.86 48,403.86 12/15/2029 74,873.75 74,873.75 6/15/2030 288,000 72,993.60 360,993.60 433,987.20 6/15/2030 140,000 48,403.86 188,403.86 236,807.72 6/15/2030 935,000 74,873.75 1,009,873.75 1,084,747.50 12/15/2030 68,731.20 68,731.20 12/15/2030 46,144.26 46,144.26 12/15/2030 64,822.50 64,822.50 6/15/2031 294,000 68,731.20 362,731.20 431,462.40 6/15/2031 149,000 46,144.26 195,144.26 241,288.52 6/15/2031 950,000 64,822.50 1,014,822.50 1,079,645.00 12/15/2031 64,380.00 64,380.00 12/15/2031 43,739.40 43,739.40 12/15/2031 54,610.00 54,610.00 6/15/2032 309,000 64,380.00 373,380.00 437,760.00 6/15/2032 152,000 43,739.40 195,739.40 239,478.80 6/15/2032 970,000 54,610.00 1,024,610.00 1,079,220.00 12/15/2032 59,806.80 59,806.80 12/15/2032 41,286.12 41,286.12 12/15/2032 44,182.50 44,182.50 6/15/2033 315,000 59,806.80 374,806.80 434,613.60 6/15/2033 156,000 41,286.12 197,286.12 238,572.24 6/15/2033 990,000 44,182.50 1,034,182.50 1,078,365.00 12/15/2033 55,144.80 55,144.80 12/15/2033 38,768.28 38,768.28 12/15/2033 33,540.00 33,540.00 6/15/2034 325,000 55,144.80 380,144.80 435,289.60 6/15/2034 209,000 38,768.28 247,768.28 286,536.56 6/15/2034 1,015,000 33,540.00 1,048,540.00 1,082,080.00 12/15/2034 50,334.80 50,334.80 12/15/2034 35,395.02 35,395.02 12/15/2034 22,628.75 22,628.75 6/15/2035 334,000 50,334.80 384,334.80 434,669.60 6/15/2035 212,000 35,395.02 247,395.02 282,790.04 6/15/2035 1,040,000 22,628.75 1,062,628.75 1,085,257.50 12/15/2035 45,391.60 45,391.60 12/15/2035 31,973.34 31,973.34 12/15/2035 11,448.75 11,448.75 6/15/2036 347,000 45,391.60 392,391.60 437,783.20 6/15/2036 219,000 31,973.34 250,973.34 282,946.68 6/15/2036 1,065,000 11,448.75 1,076,448.75 1,087,897.50 12/15/2036 40,256.00 40,256.00 12/15/2036 28,438.68 28,438.68 13,655,000 2,475,827.56 16,130,827.56 16,130,827.56 6/15/2037 356,000 40,256.00 396,256.00 436,512.00 6/15/2037 230,000 28,438.68 258,438.68 286,877.36 12/15/2037 34,987.20 34,987.20 12/15/2037 24,726.48 24,726.48 Assumes tax-exempt conversion on June 15, 2024. 6/15/2038 364,000 34,987.20 398,987.20 433,974.40 6/15/2038 236,000 24,726.48 260,726.48 285,452.96 12/15/2038 29,600.00 29,600.00 12/15/2038 20,917.44 20,917.44 6/15/2039 376,000 29,600.00 405,600.00 435,200.00 6/15/2039 242,000 20,917.44 262,917.44 283,834.88 12/15/2039 24,035.20 24,035.20 12/15/2039 17,011.56 17,011.56 6/15/2040 388,000 24,035.20 412,035.20 436,070.40 6/15/2040 252,000 17,011.56 269,011.56 286,023.12 12/15/2040 18,292.80 18,292.80 12/15/2040 12,944.28 12,944.28 6/15/2041 399,000 18,292.80 417,292.80 435,585.60 6/15/2041 258,000 12,944.28 270,944.28 283,888.56 12/15/2041 12,387.60 12,387.60 12/15/2041 8,780.16 8,780.16 6/15/2042 414,000 12,387.60 426,387.60 438,775.20 6/15/2042 267,000 8,780.16 275,780.16 284,560.32 12/15/2042 6,260.40 6,260.40 12/15/2042 4,470.78 4,470.78 6/15/2043 423,000 6,260.40 429,260.40 435,520.80 6/15/2043 277,000 4,470.78 281,470.78 285,941.56 6,487,000 2,480,987.15 8,967,987.15 8,967,987.15 3,817,000 1,644,647.96 5,461,647.96 5,461,647.96 Assumes tax-exempt conversion on June 15, 2023. Assumes tax-exempt conversion on June 15, 2023.

UTILITY FUND OBLIGATIONS
Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022B Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A 312

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE_
187}

POSITION CONTROL AND

SALARY SCHEDULES
313

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE_
188}

CHANGE IN FTE AVERAGE MONTHLY COMPENSATION
POSITION TITLE 2022-2023 2023-2024 STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 TOTAL FTE COUNT 132.00 6.00 138.00 CITY COUNCIL 5.00 - 5.00
MAYOR 1.00 - 1.00 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ COUNCIL MEMBER 4.00 - 4.00 300 300 300 300 300 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 8.00 1.00 9.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR 1.00 - 1.00 8,334$ 8,751$ 9,188$ 9,648$ 10,130$ SR ACCOUNTANT 1.00 - 1.00 5,608 5,888 6,183 6,492 6,816 GRANT MANAGER 1.00 (1.00) - 5,373 5,642 5,924 6,220 6,531 MANAGEMENT ANALYST - 1.00 1.00 5,373 5,642 5,924 6,220 6,531 ACCOUNTANT 1.00 - 1.00 4,844 5,086 5,340 5,608 5,888 ACCOUNT CLERK II 3.00 - 3.00 3,430 3,602 3,782 3,971 4,169 ACCOUNT CLERK I 1.00 1.00 2.00 2,894 3,039 3,191 3,350 3,518 CITY MANAGER & CITY CLERK 4.00 - 4.00 CITY MANAGER 1.00 - 1.00 11,819$ -$ -$ -$ 14,775$ CITY CLERK / DEPUTY PERSONNEL DIRECTOR 1.00 - 1.00 7,937 8,334 8,751 9,188 9,647 HR TECHNICIAN 1.00 - 1.00 3,604 3,784 3,973 4,172 4,381 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER 1.00 - 1.00 5,118 5,374 5,643 5,925 6,222 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8.50 1.00 9.50 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 1.00 - 1.00 8,334$ 8,751$ 9,188$ 9,648$ 10,130$ SENIOR PLANNER 1.00 - 1.00 6,073 6,377 6,695 7,030 7,382 BUILDING OFFICIAL 1.00 - 1.00 5,118 5,374 5,643 5,925 6,222 BUILDING INSPECTOR 1.00 - 1.00 4,597 4,827 5,068 5,322 5,588 PROGRAM TECHNICIAN 1.00 1.00 2.00 3,819 4,010 4,210 4,421 4,642 (PT) BUILDING INSPECTOR (HOURLY) 0.50 - 0.50 26.52 27.85 29.24 30.70 32.24 SR. CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 1.00 - 1.00 3,018 3,169 3,327 3,494 3,668 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 1.00 - 1.00 2,781 2,920 3,066 3,219 3,380 (PT) CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER (HOURLY) 1.00 - 1.00 16.04 16.84 17.68 18.56 19.49 FIRE DEPARTMENT 32.00 2.00 34.00 FIRE CHIEF 1.00 - 1.00 9,250$ 9,713$ 10,199$ 10,709$ 11,244$ FIRE CAPTAIN 3.00 - 3.00 5,664 5,946 6,244 6,556 6,884 COMMUNITY RISK REDUCTION OFFICER 1.00 - 1.00 5,664 5,946 6,244 6,556 6,884 FIRE LIEUTENANT 3.00 - 3.00 5,267 5,531 5,807 6,097 6,402 FFS/ENGINEER 3.00 - 3.00 4,892 5,137 5,395 5,663 5,947 FIREFIGHTER II 10.00 - 10.00 4,660 4,893 5,137 5,394 5,663 FIREFIGHTER I 5.00 - 5.00 4,127 4,333 4,551 4,776 5,016 NON-SAFETY PARAMEDIC (HOURLY) 2.00 - 2.00 18.83 19.77 20.76 21.79 22.88 NON-SAFETY EMT (HOURLY) 2.00 2.00 4.00 16.96 17.81 18.70 19.64 20.62 BILLING CLERK 1.00 - 1.00 3,314 3,480 3,654 3,836 4,028 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 1.00 - 1.00 3,637 3,819 4,010 4,210 4,421 POLICE DEPARTMENT 46.00 (1.00) 45.00 POLICE CHIEF 1.00 - 1.00 9,250$ 9,713$ 10,199$ 10,709$ 11,244$ COMMANDER 2.00 - 2.00 7,244 7,606 7,987 8,386 8,805 SERGEANT 5.00 - 5.00 6,299 6,614 6,945 7,292 7,656 CORPORAL 4.00 - 4.00 5,713 5,999 6,299 6,614 6,944 POLICE OFFICER 28.00 (1.00) 27.00 5,182 5,441 5,713 5,999 6,299 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER II 2.00 - 2.00 4,272 4,486 4,710 4,945 5,193 RECORDS SUPERVISOR 1.00 - 1.00 4,913 5,159 5,417 5,687 5,972 RECORDS CLERK I 1.00 - 1.00 3,170 3,329 3,495 3,670 3,853 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER 1.00 - 1.00 3,688 3,872 4,066 4,269 4,483 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1.00 - 1.00 3,604 3,784 3,973 4,172 4,381 314

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL ∙ FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PAGE_
189}

CHANGE IN FTE AVERAGE MONTHLY COMPENSATION
POSITION TITLE 2022-2023 2023-2024 STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 PUBLIC WORKS 25.00 3.00 28.00 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.00 - 1.00 8,334$ 8,751$ 9,188$ 9,648$ 10,130$ DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.00 - 1.00 6,376 6,695 7,030 7,382 7,751 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.00 - 1.00 5,373 5,642 5,924 6,220 6,531 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR 1.00 - 1.00 5,373 5,642 5,924 6,220 6,531 SR SP&F WORKER 4.00 - 4.00 3,878 4,072 4,275 4,489 4,714 SP&F WORKER II 3.00 - 3.00 3,605 3,785 3,975 4,173 4,382 SP&F WORKER I 3.00 - 3.00 3,190 3,350 3,517 3,693 3,877 PLANT MANAGER 1.00 - 1.00 5,373 5,642 5,924 6,220 6,531 CHIEF OPERATOR 1.00 - 1.00 5,198 5,458 5,731 6,017 6,318 WASTEWATER OPERATOR III 2.00 - 2.00 4,715 4,951 5,198 5,458 5,731 WASTEWATER OPERATOR II - - - 3,973 4,172 4,380 4,599 4,829 WASTEWATER OPERATOR I 3.00 1.00 4.00 3,605 3,785 3,975 4,173 4,382 MECHANIC 1.00 - 1.00 3,605 3,785 3,975 4,173 4,382 WATER OPERATOR II 1.00 - 1.00 3,973 4,172 4,380 4,599 4,829 WATER OPERATOR I 1.00 2.00 3.00 3,605 3,785 3,975 4,173 4,382 GRAFFITI REMOVAL OPERATOR 1.00 - 1.00 3,190 3,350 3,517 3,693 3,877 RECREATION 3.50 - 3.50
RECREATION SUPERVISOR 1.00 - 1.00 5,373 5,642 5,924 6,220 6,531 SENIOR COORDINATOR 1.00 - 1.00 3,036 3,188 3,347 3,515 3,690 RECREATION SPECIALIST I 1.00 - 1.00 2,964 3,112 3,268 3,431 3,603 PT RECREATION SPECIALIST I (HOURLY) 0.50 - 0.50 17.10 17.95 18.85 37.10 20.79 315
RESOLUTTON NO. 2\2s-e1

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
WHEREAS, Section 7900 of the Govemment Code provides for the implementation of Article XIIIB of the Califomia Constitution; and
WHEREAS, Section 7901 through7913 of the Govemment code provide that each year the goveming body of each local jurisdiction shalf by resolution, establish its proceeds of taxes appropriation limit at a regularly scheduled meeting; and WHEREAS, all documentation used in the determination of the proceeds of taxes appropriations limit for the 2023-2024 Fiscal Year is calculated by adjusting the "base year", Fiscal Year 1978-79, proceeds of taxes appropriation limit for the population change and the change in the per capita personal income or local assessment roll due to non-residential construction.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER, does hereby resolve as follows:

The proceeds of taxes appropriation limit for the year 2023-2024is established at$38,557,526 and that the appropriation from proceeds of taxes; revenue subject to the limitation is $1'1,094,400 an amountbelow the established limitby $27,463,126. Documentation used in the determination of the proceeds of tax appropriation limit is available to the public at the City of Sanger, Administrative Services Department, 1700 7th Street, Sanger, California.

The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council of the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15s day of June2023 and approved by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padron, City Clerk
316

CITY OF SANGER
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT: GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Fiscal Year
FY 2023-2024
Per Capita
Adjustment
Population
Adjustment
t.ot44

1.0152
L.0228

1.0067
r.0072

0.9904
o.9977
Total
Adjustment

1.0518

1.0525

1.0622
t.0442

1.0649
r.0672
r.0420
Appropriation
Limit
s 27,892,927
S 29,3s6,130
S 31,181,430
s 32,s61,20s
s 34,674,836
s 37,003,450
S 38,ss7,s26
Notes
2078
2019
2020
z02t
2022
2023
2024

1.0369
r.0367

1.0385
L.O373

1.0573
t.0775
t.o4M
PRICE AND POPUI.ATION FACTORS
DETERMINING THE FY 2024 RATE FACTOR
Per Capita Personal lncome Change from FY 2023 to FY 2024 Population Change (same period)
Per Capita Cost of Living Ratio
Population Ratio
Rate Factor
Factor

4.44%
-0.23%
t.o775

0.9904
t.o672
Notes
FY 2024 TAX APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO THE GANN LIMIT FY 2024 Est.

PropertyTax S 2,110,100
Sales & Use Tax 5 S,SZ+,SOO
Utility UsersTax S 1,960,000
Franchise Fees S 640,000
Business License Tax S 150,000
Transient OccupanryTax S 10,000
Motorvehicle ln Lieu S 2,9OO,OOO
Notes
TIMIT Factor
S 38,ss7,s26
s 11.094.400
s
Notes
GANN Limit for FY 2024
Unadjusted Appropriations Subiect to Limit
Projected Appropriations are below Limit by ,463,t2627
317
RESOLUTTON NO. 2on-28

A RESOLUTIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER AUTHORIZING

REGULAR FULL-TIME POSITIONS AND REGULAR PART-TIME POSITIONS IN THE CITY SERVICE EFFECTIVE JULY I,2O23,IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE 2023-2024 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, as the City Council of the City of Sanger did adopt a Resolution adopting the City Operating Budget and the Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Sanger does hereby authorize the regular full-time and regular part-time positions in each City department as provided for in the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 operating budget and as detailed in the attached schedule.
r3r$r}'irir}'G)t't't****r+******ri't*r$*rgri)grg*)g*rt*********rF** The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council of the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15ft day of lune2023 and approved by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padron, City Clerk
318
ffi

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL FISCAL YEAR2023-2024

CHANGE IN FTE
2022-2021
131.50 5.00

AVERAGE MONTHLY COMPENSATION
STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5POSITION TITLE

TOTAL FTE COUNT
2023-2024
138.00
STEP 1
clw couNctL 5.00 5.00
MAYOR

COUNCIL MEMBER

1.00 4.00

1.00 s

4.00 300 s soo s 300
300
5 s 300300
300 300
ADMI NISTRATIVE SERVICES 8.00 1.00 9.00

ADM I N ISTRATIVE SERVICES DI RECTOR

SR ACCOUNTANT

GRANT MANAGER

MANAGEMENT ANALYST

ACCOUNTANT

ACCOUNT CLERK II

ACCOUNTCLERK I

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00
(r..oo)

1.00 1.00 s

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

2.OO
8,334 s
s,608
5,373
5,373
4,844
3,430
2,894
8,757 s
5,888
5,642
5,642
s,086
3,602
3,039
e,1q8 s
61183
5,924
s,924
5,340
3,782
3,191
9,64s S
6,492
6,220
6,220
5,508
3,97r
3,350
10,130
6,816
6,s31
6,531
5,888
4,169
3,5181.00
CITY MANAGER & CITY CLERK 4.00 4.00

CITY MANAGER

CITY CLERK/ DEPUTY PERSONNEL DIRECTOR

HR TECHNICIAN

EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CIW MANAGER

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
1:oo
100

1.00 1.00
$ 5 s 5
9,188
4,172
5,925
t4,775
9!647
4,38r
6,222
8,334
3,784
5,374
8,75r
3,973
5,543
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8.s0 1.00 9.50

COMM U N ITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

SENIOR PLANNER

BUILDING OFFICIAL

BUILDING INSPECTOR

PROGRAM TECHNICIAN
(PT) BUILDING INSPECTOR (HOURLY}

SR, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
(PT) CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER (HOURLY)

1.90 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0.s0

1.00 1.00

1.00 s

1.00 109

1.00 2.00

0.s0

1.00 1.00

1.00 8,334 s
6,O73
5,118
4,597
3,819

26.s2
3t01.8
2,781

15.04 8,751 s
6,377
5,374
4,827
4,0t0

27.85 3,169
2,920

76.84 9,188 s
6,69s
5,643
5,068
4!2LO

29.24 3,327
3,065

17.68 9,648 s
7,030
s,92s
5,322
4,42t
30170
3,494
3,2L9

18.56 10,130
7,382
6,222
5,588
4,642

32.24 3.668
3,390
L9.49
FIRE DEPARTMENT 32.OO 34.002.00

FIRE CHIEF

FIRE CAPTAIN

COMMUNITY RISK REDUCTION OFFICER

FIRE LIEUTENANT

FFS/ENGINEER

FIREFIGHTER II

FIREFLGHTER I
NON-SAFEry PARAMEDTC (HOURLY)
NON.SAFETY EMT (HOURLY)

BILLING CLERK

ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY

1.00 3.OO

1.00 3.00

3.00 10.00
s.00

2.00 2.OO

1.00 1.00

1.00 $
3:oo
100

3.00 3.00

10.00 5.00

2.OO

4.00 1.00

1.00 9,250 s
5,664
5,6-64
s,267
4,892
4,660
4,r27

18.83 16.96
3,374
3,637
9,713
5,946
5,946
5,531
5t137
4,893
4,333

19.77 77.8L
3,480
3,819
10,L99
6,244
6!244
5,807
5,395
5,737
4,551

20.76 18.70
3,6s4
4,0t0
r0,709
6,556
5,555
6,O97
5,663
5,394
4,776

21.79 19.64
3,836
4,zt0
11,244
6,884
6,894
6,402
5,947

5.663
5,01q

22.88 20.62
4,O28
4,427

2.OO
POLICE DEPARTMENT 46.00 45.00

POLICE CHIEF

COMMANDER

SERGEANT

CORPORAL

POLICE OFFICER

COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER II

RECORDS SUPERVISOR

RECORDS CLERK I

ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER

ADMI N ISTRATIVE ASSISTANT

1.00 2.00
s.00

4.00 28.00

2.OO

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
9,250 s
7,244
6,299
5,71'3
5,182
4,272
4,9L3
3,L70
3,688
3,604
9,7t3 s
7,606
6,6L4
s,999
5,44L
4,486
5,159
3,329
3,872
3,784
10,199 s
7,987
6,945
6,Z:ss
5,71'3
4,7t0
5,4t7
3,49s
4,066
3,973
10,709 s
8,386
7,292
6,614
5,999
4,945
5,68.7
3,670
4,269
4,r72
Lt,244
8,80s
7,656
6,944
6,299
5,193
5,972
3,853
4,483
4,38r
s

1.00 1.00

1.00 4.00

3.00 (1.00)

1.oo s

1.00 1.00

4.00 3.00
8,334 s
5,373
5,373
3,878
3,605
8,75L s
5,642
5,642
4,O72
3,785
9,188
5,924
5,924
4,275
3,975
9,648
6,220
6,220
4,489
4,L73
PUBLIC WORKS 25.00 3.00 28.00

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

MANAGEMENT ANALYST

PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR

SR SP&F WORKER

SP&F WORKER II
10,130
6,s31
6,s31
4,7t4
4,382
319
*

CITY OF SANGER
OPERATING BUDGET DETAIL FISCAL YEAR2023-2024

CHANGE IN FTE AVERAGE MONTHLY COMPENSATION
STEPI $fEP? 5TEP3 5TEP4POSITION TITLE 2022-20n

3.00 STEP 5
SP&F WORKER I 3.00 .._, "_-"-9.19_0*.- - - 1.1s9_-_ -- ?,s_L*l_ . , --,"-3..9"9-1-.. .,. _3!g!7*.

1.00 .. . -9.3J[ _ _." _- 9,_69-s- - .". Z,g1g_ -- 7,382 7,757

1.00 --_ ...s-,379,_ _ "-1'W,. . _s,9?3.... ""_ .,.9r?4 ,-_6,t91 L.00
DEPUry PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.00
PLANT MANAGER 1.00
CHIEF OPERATOR 1.00 5,458 5,737 6,017 6,3L8
.1.sJ1 - s,198 5,458 5,731WASTEWATER OPERATOR III 2.00 2.00 4,7L5 WASTEWATER OPERATOR II 3,973 !'!-? 4,380 4,599 ..- "..L[2J' WASTEWATER OPERATOR I 3.00 1.00 4.00 3,60s

1.00 3,60s 3,785 3,975
l,!?" 4,38?
4,173 4,382
3,975
MECHANIC 1.00
WATER OPERATOR II 1.00 1,00 3,973 4,172 4,380 4,599 4,829 173 4,382

1.00 ._ -.,_-3119_0- .- 3,3s0 .",?Fll_ _-- *3r_1s!. _ .*3.8]1^. " WATER OPERATOR I 1.00--ioo". -

GRAFFITI REMOVAL OPERATOR
RECREATION 3.00 3.s0

RECREATION SUPERVISOR
SENIOR COORDINATOR 1.00 1.00 3,188 3,347 3,515 3,690
RECREATION SPECIALIST I 1.00 1.00 3,tLz 3,431- , '3"!3*q, 2,964
PT RECREATTON SPECTALTST I (HOURLy) 0.50 0.50 17.70 77.95 18.8s 37.10 20.79 320
RESOLUTTON NO. 20n-2 q

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER MAKING A

DETERMINATION OF THE NECESSITY OF CONTINUING THE UTILITY USER'S TAX WHEREAS, as the City Council of the City of Sanger has adopted an Ordinance establishing a Utility user's Tax; and
WHEREAS, the Ordinance is codified in Chapter 66, Article IV of the Sanger City Code; and WHEREAS, the Utility User's Tax was established to eliminate budget deficits, establish a sound financial position, and provide the Sanger Community with programs and services that improve the overall quality of life, and
WHEREAS, a budget for the FY 2023-2024 is proposed and includes a revenue source derived from the Utility User's Tax; and
WHEREAS, the Sanger City Code Section 660-103 requires that the City Council conduct an annual review of the Utility LJser's Tax to be conducted with the public hearing held each year for the City's annual budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted the annual review of the Utility User's Tax at the budget public hearing on June I and June 15,2023.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Sanger as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference.

2. Based on the annual review of the annual City budget, there is a financial necessity for continuance of the Utility lJser's Tax per Chapter 66, Article IV of the Sanger City Code.

3. The Utility User's Tax is necessary to provide programs and services to members of the Sanger Community.
rt r& tl. * * * d. * * tl. * * t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. ,1.,1.,F {< tf * * tl. {. {< * * rl. * * rl. :$ * The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council of the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15th day of June 2023 and approved by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padron, City Clerk
321
RESOLUTTON NO. 20n- 3 q

A RESOLUTIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER ADOPTING AN INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53646 requires the City to annually adopt an investment policy;
WHEREAS, the Investment Policy attached here as Attachment A and included in the FY 2023-2024 adopted budget remains the same as previous years and conforms to Government Code Section 53600 through 53646.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Sanger does hereby adopt the City of Sanger's Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 as provided for in the Fiscal Year 2023-2024operating budget and as detailed in the attached schedule.

The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council of the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15e day of lune2023 and approved by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN
ABSENT:

Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padron, City Clerk
322
lnvestment Policy
Purpose
This statement is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City of Sanger's temporary idle cash for all funds and outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the city's cash management system. The ultimate goal is to enhance the economic status of the city while protecting its pooled cash.

The normal operating funds of the city shall be governed by the constraints imposed by this policy. However, recognizing the need for special consideration in investing substantial proceeds from the debt issue activities of the city, the full range of investment opportunities authorized by California Government Code Section 53601 will apply to funds from debt issue activities.

Objective
The city's cash management system is designed to accurately monitor and forecast expenditures and revenues, thus enabling the city to invest funds to the fullest extent possible. The city attempts to obtain the highest yield obtainable as long as investments meet the criteria established for safety and liquidity.

Prudent I nvestor Sta ndard
lnvestments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived.

The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be "Prudent lnvestor Rule" (Civil Code Section 226L, et seq.)1. This affords the city a broad spectrum of investment opportunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California (Government Code Section 53601, et seq.).

Objectives
As specified in California Government Code Section 53600.5, when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling and managing public funds, primary objectives, in priority order, of the investment activities shall be:

7. Safety. The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest or a combination of these amounts. Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. lnvestments of the City of Sanger shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. To attain this objective, diversification is required in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed the income generated from the remainder of the portfolio.

2. tiquidity. This refers to the ability to "cash in" at any moment in time with a minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest. The investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the city to meet all operating requirement that might be reasonably anticipated. 1 The Prudent lnvestor Rule states, in essence, that "in investing . . . property for the benefit of another, a trustee shall exercise the judgment and care, under the circumstances then prevailing, which men of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs. . ." 323

3. Yield. Yield is the potential dollar earnings an investment can provide, and sometimes is described as the rate of return. Yield is a consideration only after the basic requirements of safety and liquidity have been met.

Delegation of Authority
Authority to manage the investment program is derived from California Government Code Section 53600, et seq. Management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated to the Administrative Services Director who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this investment policy and the requirements of applicable laws. The Administrative Services Director shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of internal staff and any external investment advisors.

All participants in the investment process shall act as custodians of the public trust and all investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of the public trust. All investment related activity shall be done in conformance with this policy and all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations.

Ethics a nd Conflicts of lnterest
Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with the proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officers shall disclose any financial interest in financial institutions that conduct business with the city, and they shall further disclose any personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the city's portfolio. Employees and officers shall subordinate their personal investment transactions to those of the city, particularly with regard to the timing of purchases and sales and shall avoid transactions that might impair public confidence. lnvestment Guidelines
All City funds not required for immediate expenditure shall be fully invested or deposited to maximize investment returns. To maximize returns, the economy and market conditions should be monitored in order to assess the probable course of interest rates.

The Administrative Services Director shall utilize those eligible investments instruments as set forth in Government Code Sections 5360L and 53635 while following these guidelines:

1. Safekeeping and Custody. All investments of the city shall have the City of Sanger as the registered owner or shall be kept in custody of the city or the trust department of its designated third party, safekeeping institution. lf securities are kept by a safekeeping institution, the city shall have access to buy and sell such securities independently of any broker. While in safekeeping, the city shall have on file from its designated bank, a written statement that the city has a 'perfected interest' in all securities held in the trust department. The trust department shall be required to send the city a monthly statement of what is being kept. The Administrative Services Director shall state in the monthly treasurer's report that the statement from the trustee has been reviewed and that the securities are being adequately protected or insured against the risk of loss.
324

2. Diversification. lnvestments shall be diversified among institutions, type of securities and maturities. lnvestments shall be diversified to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from over concentration of investments in a specific maturity, issuer or class of securities. ln establishing a diversification strategy, the following general policies and constraints shall apply:
a. Portfolio maturities shall be matched versus liabilities to avoid undue concentration in a specific maturity sector.
b. Maturities selected shall be provide for stability of income and liquidity c. Disbursement and payroll dates shall be covered through liquid investments with a daily maturity date.

3. Collateralization. All individual certificates of deposit in excess of S250,000 must be collateralized. Collateral must meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 53652.

4. Financial Institutions. ln selecting financial institutions, the creditworthiness shall be considered, and the Administrative Services Director shall review the financial history of the institution and utilize only those depositories that are qualified public depositories as established by state law. City funds in excess of the FDIC insured amount shall be invested only in financial institutions sufficiently capitalized to accommodate the city's cash needs. lnvestments shall not knowingly be made in any financial institution that practices or supports directly or indirectly, through its actions, discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, creed, natural or ethnic origin, age, sex or physical disability.

5. Brokers/Dealers. The city shall select only broker/dealers in accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601.5 who are licensed and in good standing with the California Department of Securities, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Association of Securities Dealers or other self-regulatory organizations. Before engaging in investment transactions with a broker/dealer the city shall have received from said firm a signed Certification Form. This form shall attest that the individual has reviewed the City of Sanger's lnvestment Policy and understands the policy and intends to present investment recommendations and transactions to the city that are appropriate under the terms and conditions of the lnvestment Policy.

6. Reporting. The Administrative Services Director shall report monthly to the City Attorney and City Council the type of investment, financial institution, date of maturity, amount of investment, current market value, rate of interest for all securities with a maturity of more than 12 months and a statement that all city investments are in compliance with the city investment policy and all applicable provisions of the California Government Code. Failure by the Administrative Services Director to so report shall cause the City Attorney to notify the City Council of said failure.

7. Scope of Funds. Pursuant to Government Code, Section 53647, the Administrative Services Director shall allocate interest earned to the funds listed in Schedule "N' of this lnvestment Policy. The funds listed in Schedule " N' may change from time to time because of the addition or deletions to the activities of the city No fund with an average monthly cash balance of less than $1-0,000 will receive further interest unless required otherwise by law. All interest not otherwise allocated shall remain in the General Fund.

8. Liquidity. The City of Sanger strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinations always maintaining sufficient funds available to meet six months of obligations. The basic premise underlying the city's investment philosophy is, and will continue 325
to be, to ensure that money is always safe and available when needed lnvestments Permitted and Limitations
Allowable investments for the portfolio of The City of Sanger are limited by California Government Code Sections 53601 et seq. 53635. Percentages of lnvestment Participation and percentages of Maximum, Participation apply at the time of purchase. ln no event, shall investment maturities exceed five years.

U.S. Treasury Securities
United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the full faith and credit of the United State are pledged for the payment of principal and interest.

Maximum Maturity 5 years
lnvestment Participation 7OO%
Federal Asencies Secu rities
Obligations issued by Federal Government agencies and Government Sponsored Enterprises (U.S. lnstrumentalities) such as the Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB), the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC)and other similar securities. Such securities are obligations of the agencies themselves, but there is also an implied guarantee by the United States Government.

Maximum Maturity 5 years
lnvestment Participation lOO%
Certificates of Deposit
lssued by commercial banks and credit unions with federal deposit insurance available for amounts up to S250,000. Financial institutions must provide collateral for deposits over S25O,OO0.

Maximum Maturity 5 Years
lnvestment Participation 30%
N egotia ble Certificates of Deposit
lssued by commercial banks and credit unions with federal deposit insurance available for amounts up to s250,000.

Maximum Maturity 5 years
lnvestment Participation 30%
Local Asencv lnvestment Fund (LAIF)
The Local Agency lnvestment Fund (LAIF) is a special fund in the California State Treasury created and governed pursuant to Government Code Sections 1,6429.1, et seq. lt is a pooled investment fund managed by the State Treasurer's office for the exclusive benefit of governmental entities within California. Principal amount withdrawal of S15 million or greater need 24-hour notice and less than $15 million may be withdrawn the same day.

Maximum Maturity N/A
326
lnvestment Participation Maximum allowed by LAIF
Medium -Term Corporate Notes
Medium Term Notes of a maximum of five years maturity issued by corporations organized and operating with the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any states and operating within the United States. A rating agency must rate notes eligible for investment "AAA" or "AA". lf the credit rating of the security falls below the "A" grade, it must be sold and removed from the city portfolio.

Maximum Maturity 5 years
lnvestment Participation 30%
Program to Encourage Local Development
To encourage local economic development, local financial institutions will be utilized to provide investment products for a portion of the city's portfolio. Such products will not necessarily result in maximum earnings for the portfolio. However, the loss of short-term investment yields may be offset by the potential expansion of the tax base. Local financial institutions eligible for participation in this program are defined as any financial institution whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit lnsurance Corporation (for commercial and savings banks), Savings Association lnsurance Fund (for savings and loans associations) and the National Credit Union Share lnsurance Fund (forcredit unions)and organized and chartered underthe lawsof the United States or the State of California. Local institutions shall mean any financial institution headquartered in Fresno County or any financial institution with a full-service branch in Fresno County. The institution shall be able to collateralize the city funds in accordance with California Government Code Section 53652. lnternalControls
A system of internalcontrols will be maintained to assure compliance with Federaland State regulations, city council direction, and prudent cash management procedures. There will be an annual audit conducted by an independent outside auditing firm to ensure compliance with all regulations and the investment policy of the city.

Statement of lnvestment Policy
The City of Sanger's investment policy shall be adopted by resolution of the City Council. The policy shall be reviewed annually by the City Council and they must approve any modifications.

Allocation of lnterest
Schedule "A"
L. General Fund

2. GasTax Funds (2106,2LO7,2tO7.5 and 2105)

3. Transportation Development Act Funds (Articles lll and Vlll)

4. Measure "C" Funds

5. Redevelopment Agency Funds

6. Sewer Operations Fund
327

7. Water Operations Fund

8. DisposalOperation Fund

9. Ambulance Operations Fund

10. Developers Fee Fund
1L. Risk Management Fund

12. ISTEA Fund
L3. Federal and State Grant Funds
328
RESOLUTION NO. 2ON- 4 I

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER ADOPTING

MASTER SALARY TABLES FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF SANGER WHEREAS, Section 36506 of the Govemment Code of the State of California provides that the City Council shall, by Resolution or Ordinance, fix the compensation for all appointive officers and employees; and
WHEREAS, the Master Salary Tables are attached as Exhibit'oA" to this Resolution and have been reviewed and considered by the City Council; and NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Sanger, State of Califomia:

1. The Master Salary Tables attached hereto as Exhibit "A" ars hereby adopted

2. All prior resolutions conceming compensation for City employees that are in conflict with this Resolution or the attached Master Salary Tables are hereby repealed, and this Resolution shall be effective July 1, 2023. * !t rl. t rl. {. :1. * * * d. !tr * * * :l€ *
The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council of the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15th day of June 2023 and approved by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN
ABSENT:

COLINCILMEMBERS:

COUNCILMEMBERS:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padron, City Clerk
329

CITY OF SANGER
FY 2023-2024 BUDGET

MASTER SALARY TABLE
(coMPENSATTON ORDER)
POStTION Stepl Step2 Step3 Step4 Step5 Frequency

NON-SAFETY EMT

NON-SAFETY PARAMEDIC

CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

ACCOUNT CLERK I

ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK

RECREATION SPECIALIST I

SR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

SENIOR COORDINATOR

RECORDS CLERK I

CONSTRUCTION WORKER I

GRAFFITI REMOVAL OPERATOR

MECHANIC I

SANITATION WORKER I

STREETS, PKS & FAC WORKER I

WASTEWATER OPERATOR TRAIN EE

WATER OPERATOR TRAINEE

BILLING CLERK

ACCOUNT CLERK II

RECORDS CLERK II

ADM I N ISTRATIVE ASSISTANT

HR TECHNICIAN

CONSTRUCTION WORKER II

MECHANIC II

SANITATION WORKER II

STREETS, PKS & FAC WORKER II

WASTEWATER OPERATOR I

WATER OPERATOR I

ADM I N ISTRATIVE SECRETARY

ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER

COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER I

PROGRAM TECHNICIAN

FACILIW MAI NTENANCE WORKER

SENIOR CONSTRUCTION WORKER

SR MECHANIC

SR SANITATION WORKER

SR STREETS, PARKS, FACILITIES WORKER

WASTEWATER OPERATOR II

WATER OPERATOR II

FIREFIGHTER I

16.95 18.83
2,78L
2,894
2,994
2,964
3,018
3,035
3,L7O
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,190
3,27O
3,270
3,3L4
3,430
3,494
3,604
3,604
3,605
3,605
3,605
3,605
3,605
3,605
3,637
3,688
3,688
3,819
3,878
3,878
3,878
3,878
3,878
3,973
3,973
4,L27
L7.8L

19.77 2,92O
3,039
3,039
3,L12
3,169
3,188
3,329
3,350
3,350
3,350
3,350
3,350
3,434
3,434
3,480
3,602
3,669
3,784
3,784
3,785
3,785
3,785
3,785
3,785
3,785
3,819
3,872
3,872
4,OtO
4,O72
4,O72
4,O72
4,O72
4,O72
4,772
4,r72
4,333
t8.70

20.76 3,066
3,tgL
3,191
3,268
3,327
3,347
3,495
3,577
3,5r7
3,5L7
3,5L7
3,5t7
3,605
3,605
3,654
3,782
3,852
3,973
3,973
3,975
3,975
3,975
3,975
3,975
3,975
4,OrO
4,066
4,066
4,2rO
4,275
4,275
4,275
4,275
4,275
4,380
4,380
4,550

19.63 21.80
3,279
3,350
3,350
3,431
3,494
3,5L5
3,670
3,693
3,693
3,693
3,693
3,693
3,785
3,785
3,836
3,977
4,O45
4,L72
4,t72
4,t73
4,!73
4,t73
4,L73
4,L73
4,173
4,2LO
4,269
4,269
4,42t
4,489
4,489
4,489
4,489
4,489
4,599
4,599
4,778

20.61 22.89
3,380
3,518
3,518
3,603
3,669
3,690
3,853
3,877
3,877
3,877
3,877
3,877
3,975
3,975
4,O28
4,169
4,247
4,38L
4,387
4,382
4,382
4,392
4,382
4,382
4,382
4,421
4,483
4,483
4,642
4,7L4
4,774
4,714
4,714
4,714
4,829
4,829
5,016
Hourly
Hourly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
330

COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER II

SEN IOR ADM I N ISTRATIVE ASSISTANT

RECREATION SPECIALIST II

SYSTEMS ANALYST

LABORATORY SUPERVISOR

LEAD CONSTRUCTION WORKER

LEAD MECHANIC

LEAD SANITATION WORKER

LEAD STREETS, PARKS, FACILITIES WORKER

CODE ENFORCEM ENT SPECIALIST

CONSTRUCTION I NSPECTOR

BUILDING INSPECTOR

FIREFIGHTER II

WASTEWATER OPERATOR I I I

WATER OPERATOR III

ACCOUNTANT

FIRE ENGINEER

POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR

EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER

BUILDING OFFICIAL

RECORDS/COMM SUPV

POLICE OFFICER

CHIEF OPERATOR

FIRE LIEUTENANT

PLANT MANAGER

PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR

RECREATION SUPERVISOR

MANAGEMENT ANALYST

GRANTS MANAGER

ASSISTANT ENGINEER

ECON DEV COORDINATOR

PLANNER

SENIOR ACCOUNTANT

CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER

FIRE CAPTAIN

COMMUNITY RISK REDUCTION OFFICER

POLICE CORPORAL

BATTALION CHIEF

SENIOR PLANNER

FIRE DIVISION CHIEF

POLICE CAPTAIN

POLICE SERGEANT

DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

ECON & REDEV MANAGER

DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF

PLANNING MANAGER
4,272
4,276
4,378
4,378
4,490
4,49L
4,49I
4,491_
4,49L
4,597
4,597
4,597
4,660
4,715
4,71,5
4,844
4,892
4,9r3
5,118
5,118
5,118
5,182
5,198
5,267
5,373
5,373
5,373
5,373
5,373
5,455
5,455
5,455
5,608
5,642
5,642
5,664
5,664
5,7L3
5,924
6,O73
6,220
6,220
6,299
6,376
6,376
6,376
6,696
4,496
4,49O
4,597
4,597
4,7L5
4,776
4,716
4,716
4,7L6
4,827
4,827
4,827
4,893
4,95r
4,951
5,086
5,r37
5,159
5,374
5,374
5,374
5,44L
5,458
5,530
5,642
5,642
5,642
5,642
5,642
5,728
5,728
5,728
5,888
5,924
5,924
5,947
5,947
5,999
6,220
6,377
6,531
6,531"
6,61"4
6,695
6,695
6,695
7,O31-
4,7rO
4,7L4
4,827
4,827
4,950
4,95L
4,95L
4,957
4,951
5,068
5,068
5,068
5,138
5,198
5,198
5,34L
5,393
5,4t7
5,643
5,643
5,643
5,713
5,73L
5,807
5,924
5,924
5,924
5,924
5,924
6,OLA
6,O14
6,0L4
6,183
6,220
6,220
6,245
6,245
6,299
6,531
6,695
6,858
6,858
6,945
7,O3O
7,O30
7,O30
7,382
4,945
4,95O
5,068
5,068
5,1_98
5,199
5,199
5,199
5,199
5,322
5,322
5,322
5,395
5,458
5,458
5,608
5,663
5,687
5,925
5,925
5,925
5,999
6,077
6,O97
6,220
6,22O
6,220
6,22O
6,22O
6,3L5
6,315
6,315
6,492
6,531
6,53L
6,557
6,557
6,614
6,858
7,O30
7,2OO
7,2O0
7,292
7,38L
7,38L
7,38!
7,751_
5,193
5,198
5,321
5,321_
5,458
5,459
5,459
5,459
5,459
5,588
5,588
5,588
5,664
5,73L
5,737
5,888
5,946
5,972
6,22r
6,221-
6,227
6,299
6,318
6,402
6,531
6,531
6,531
6,531
6,531
6,631
6,631
6,637
6,817
6,858
6,858
6,885
6,885
6,944
7,20r
7,382
7,560
7,560
7,656
7,75O
7,750
7,750
8,1_39
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
331

POLICE LIEUTENANT
crTY cLERK/DEPUTy pERSON NEL OFFTCER

FINANCE DIRECTOR

ADM IN ISTRATIVE SERVICES DI RECTOR

COM M UN ITY DEVELOPM ENT DIRECTOR

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

FIRE CHIEF

POLICE CHIEF

CITY MANAGER
7,244
7,937
7,937
8,334
8,334
8,334
9,25O
9,25O
7L,8L9
7,506
8,334
8,334
8,75L
8,75L
8,75L
9,773
9,713
7,997
8,751
8,75L
9,188
g,1gg
9,188
10,198
10,198
8,386
9,188
g,1gg
9,648
9,648
9,548
ro,708
10,708
8,805
9,647
9,647
10,130
10,130
10,130
LL,243
LL,243
L4,775
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
332
To:

From:

Subject:

Fot the Meeting of: June 1,5,2023
Agenda Item No.: F. a

SANGER HOUSING AUTHORITY
REPORT TO THtr. BOARD OF'DIRE,CTORS
Mayor and Councilmembers
Patrick Chaffee, Administrative Services Director
Sanger Housing Authority Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

None known
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Board of Directors adopts Resolution No.20B- O I approving the Sanger Housing Authority Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Sanger Housing Authority's budget was developed as an integral component of the City of Sanger's Operating and Capital Improvement Budget. The Authority's budget does not reflect any debt to be incurred during the coming fiscal year.

BACKGROUND:

The Sanger Housing Authority Proposed Budget reflects estimates of revenues and expenditures required to provide services to the residents of Sanger. The Authority's budget is developed as a part of the City of Sanger's operating and Capital improvement budget for each fiscal year.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Adoption of the Proposed Budget for fiscal year 2023-2024. will authorize the City to administer the budget starting July 1, 2023.

Preoared bv: P. Chaffee Aooroved bv: P. Chaffee
REVIEW Ciw Manaser: Finance: PC Ciw Attornev:

COUNCILACTION:TYPE OF ITEM:
--x-
Consent
Info Item
Action Item
Department Report
Redevelopment Agency

APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION
X Public Hearing
Matter Initiated by a Council Member
Other
Continued to:
333
FISCAL IMPACT:

The Adopted budget is the financial blueprint for the next fiscal year and is an integral part of prudent financial management.

ALTERNATIVES:

None
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

City staff will publish the Adopted budget and input into the Crty's hnancial software in order to ensure expenditures are within the appropriated amounts.
334
RESOLUTTON NO. zo?j.-_l2l

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SANGER HOUSING

AUTHORITY APPROVING THE SANGER HOUSING AUTHORITY
BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
WHEREAS, in accordance with City Code Section 2.8g; the City Manager submitted for consideration of the Council of the City of Sanger a proposed City Operating Budget and City Capital Improvement Budget for the City Fiscal Year 2023-2024 including therein the Operating and Capital lmprovement Budget of the Sanger Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on said budget was duly scheduled, and held, and all persons were given the opportunity to be heard and their suggestions or objections carefully considered.

NOW THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SANGER HOUSING AUTHORITY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

The Board has reviewed the proposed Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Budget and the funds included therein for the period of July 1,2023 through June 30, 2024 andhereby find that this budget is a sound plan for the financing required during Fiscal Year 2023-2024 for required operations, services and capital improvements. This budget is hereby adopted.

Total Budget $ 115.400
Total Revenues $ 41,600
,F********************rF trl|+rt*****rT***rt't**!F)t******r9ri The foregoing Resolution was considered by the Board of Directors of the Sanger Housing Authority at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 15th day of lune2023 and approved by the following vote:

LOW & MODERATE HOUSING
Sanser Housine Authoritv
$ 115.400
ATTEST:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN
ABSENT:

Board Members:

Rebeca Padron, City Clerk
335
For the Meeting of,
Agenda Item No.:

J,Nre 75,2023
F-j
To:

From:

Subject:

SANGER FINANCING AUTHORITY

REPORT TO TFIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mayor and Councilmembers
Patrick Chaffee, Administrative Services Director
Sanger Financing Authority Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

None known.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 23- O / approving the Sanger Financing Authority Budget for Fiscal Year2023-2024.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Sanger Financing Authority (the Authority) budget was developed as an integral component of the City of Sanger's Operating and Capital Improvement Budget.

BACKGROUND:

The Sanger Financing Authority Proposed Budget reflects estimates of revenues and expenditures required to make its debt service payments. The Authority's budget is developed as apart of the City of Sanger's operating and Capital improvement budget for each fiscal year. The budget includes debt service and related activities for CaIPERS Unfunded Accrued Liabilities Bonds, the 2023 Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, and the Fire Station Remodel Bonds. Although the Authority has oversight over and reports financial balances and activities for the 2023 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, the 2023 Subordinate Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds, and the 2023 Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds, those budgets are included in the appropriate enterprise funds.

Preoared bv: P. Chaffee Aooroved bv: P. Chaffee
REVIEW: Citv Manaser: Finance: PC City Attorneyi _
COUNCIL ACTIONTYPE OF ITEM:

X
Consent
Info Item
Action Item
Department Report
Redevelopment Agency

APPROVED DENIED NO ACTTON
X Public Hearing
Mattet Initiated by a Council Member
Other
Continued to:
336
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Adoption of the Proposed Budget for fiscal year 2023-2024. will authorizethe City to administer the budget starting htry I,2023 FISCAL IMPACT:

The Adopted budget is the financial blueprint for the next fiscal year and is an integral part of prudent financial management.

ALTERNATIVES
None
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

City staff will publish the Adopted budget and input into the City's financial software to ensure expenditures are within the appropriated amounts.
337
RESOLUTTON NO. n-_oJ

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SANGER FINANCING

AUTHORITY APPROVING THE SANGER FINANCING AUTHORITY
BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
WHEREAS, in accordance with City Code Section 2.8g; the City Manager submitted for consideration of the Council of the City of Sanger a proposed City Operating Budget and City Capital Improvement Budget for the City Fiscal Year 2023-2024rncluding therein the Operating and Capital Improvement Budget of the Sanger Public Financing Authority and, WHEREAS, a public meeting on said budget was duly scheduled, and held, and all persons were given the opportunity to be heard and their suggestions or objections carefully considered.

NOW THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SANGER PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

The Board has reviewed the proposed Operating Budget and Capital lmprovement Budget and the funds included therein for the period of July 1,2023 through June 30, 2024 and hereby find that this budget is a sound plan for the financing required during Fiscal Year 2023-2024 for required operations, services and capital improvements. This budget is hereby adopted.

Saneer Financine Authoritu
Debt Service
Bond Interest
Total Budget $2,600.000
Total Revenues $!
$!
ri***************r$**r}l+rlrt*rt*ri*rtr+!+r$r+rtr$rF F!+r$r$r$rFrFr+rgrgr})t*rFrt The foregoing Resolution was considered by the Board of Directors of the Sanger Public Financing Authority at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 15ft day of June 2023 and approved by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN
ABSENT:

Members:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padrory City Clerk
338
For the Meeting of: June 1,5,2023
Agenda Item No.: F -(

CITY OF SANGERAS SUCCESSOR

AGENCYTO THE SANGER

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RE,PORT TO THtr, BOARD OF'DIRE,CTORS
To: Chairman and Board Members
From: Patrick Chaffee, Administrative Services Director Subject: Sanger Successor Agency Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

None known
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City of Sanger as Successor Agency to the Sanger Redevelopment Agency adopts Resolution No.23- O I approving the City of Sanger Successor Agency Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Sanger as Successor Agency to the Sanger Redevelopment Agency's budget was developed as an integral component of the City of Sanger's Operating and Capital Improvement Budget.

BACKGROUND:

The Successor Agency Proposed Budget reflects the estimates of revenues and expenditures required for the enforceable obligations of the former Sanger Redevelopment Agency. The budget was developed as part of the City of Sanger's operating and Capital improvement budget for the fiscal year.

The city is in the process of unwinding the Successor Agency. The final steps will be to (1) finalize the disposition of remaining redevelopment properties and (2) work with the Department of Finance to ensure the Agency has completed all necessary steps to shut down the Successor Agency.

Prepared bv: P. Chaffee Apptoved by: P. Chaffee
REVIEW: Ciw Manaser: Finance: PC Ciw Attornev:

COUNCILACTIONTYPE OF ITEM:
-lL-
Consent
Info Item
Action Item
Department Report
Redevelopment Agency

APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION
X Public Hearing
Matter Initiated by a Council Member
Othet
Continued to:
339
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Adoption of the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 :vrlrll authorize the City to administer the budget starting July 1, 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Adopted budget is the financial blueprint for the next fiscal year and is an integral part of prudent financial management. The City of Sanger as Successor Agency to the Sanger Redevelopment Agency's accounting and budgetary records are reflected in Fund 381.

ALTERNATIVES:

None
ACTIONS F'OLLOWING APPROVAL:

City staff will publish the Adopted budget and input into the Crty's financial software to ensure expenditures are within the appropriated amounts.
\\nas1\shared\Forms & Templates
340
RESOLUTION NO. N- OI

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANGER AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SANGER

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ADOPTING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
WHEREAS, in accordance with City Code Section 2.8g the City Manager submitted for consideration of the City Council of the City of Sanger a proposed City Operating Budget and City Capital Improvement Budget for fiscal year 2023-2024 including therein the Operating Budget of the Successor Agency; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on said budget was duly scheduled, and held and all persons were given the opportunity to be heard and their suggestions and objections carefully considered; and
WHEREAS, the said Proposed Operating Budget contains estimates of the services, activities and projects comprising the budget and contains expendifure requirements and the resources available to the Successor Agency; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has taken the necessary public actions per State Law known as AB1X26 to ensure that the Successor Agency receives sufficient revenues to finance said Proposed Budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SANGER AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY AS FOLLOWS:

The Proposed Operating Budget is hereby approved and adopted as part of the Annual Operating Budget of the Successor Agency to the Sanger Redevelopment Agency for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024.
r+ri*r+*rirg*rlrFrl.rtrf ro$*r+r$r+r+r+rF +r}'*r$rF)gr+rt The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City of Sanger as Successor Agency to the Sanger Redevelopment Agency at a regular meeting of said Agency held on the 15th day of june 2023 and approved by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN
ABSENT:

COUNCILMEMBERS:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padrory City Clerk
341
RSANAD
l__;.$*____r
For the Meeting of: June 15,2023
Agenda Item No.:

F- o
CrrYoF SnNGER
RE,PORT TO THE, CIry COIJNCIL
To:

X'rom:

Subject:

Mayor and the City Council
John Mulligan, Public Works Director
Public Hearing Relating to Proposed City Water and Sewer Rates Attachments:

1. Resolution approving new Water and Sewer Rates including Exhibits A for Water and B for Sewer

2. Resolution approving Low-Income Water Discount Program

3. Water and Sewer Rate Study Report dated April 6,2023

4. Water and Sewer Rate Study Addendum dated May 30,2023

5. Proposition 218 Rate Notice (English and Spanish)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Open and conduct the public hearing to receive written protests, objections, and public comment regarding proposed increases to water and sewer rates.

2. Close the public hearing.

3. Direct the City Clerk to report on the number of protests received.

4. If a majority protest does not exist regarding the proposed water and sewer rates, adopt Resolution No. 2023-9] Ratifuing the proposition 218 Process Relating to Increased Water and Wastewater (Sewer) Service Charges and Adopting Monthly Water Rates and Sewer Rates to be Charged for Water and Wastewater (Sewer) Furnished by the City for a Five-Year Period Effective July 1, 2023.

5. If the resolution adopting new rates is adopted, adopt Resolution No. 2023-3 3 Approving a Low- Income Water Rate Program for Low-Income Customers and Authorizing Payment from General Fund to Water Fund for Such Discounts.

Prepated by: Approved by:

REVIEW: City City Attotneyi _
TYPE OF ITEM COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION
X
-x-X
Consent
Info Item
Action Item
Depattment Repott
Redevelopment Agency
Public Hearing
Mattet Initiated by a Council Member
Othet
Continued to:

Finance:
342
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a study of water and wastewater (sewer) rates. The City Council approved awarding the water and sewer rate study work to IGService on April 2I,2022.

The rate study was presented to the City Council on April 6,2023. At that meeting, the City Council accepted the Rate Study for both water and sewer, authorized the required actions under Proposition 278, and set a public hearing date of June 15,2023.

This Proposition 218 process involved mailing a 45-day Notice of the Proposed Rate Increases and Public Hearing to all affected customers. Any customer opposed to the rate increase would need to send a letter back to the City protesting the rate increases or submit a written protest before the Public Hearing is closed. For water and sewer, a majority protest exists if written protests are timely submitted by the customers with respect to a majority (50% plus l) of the parcels subject to the proposed rate increase.

If there is no majority protest, the City may proceed to adopt the recommended rate increases.

Overall water revenue needs to be increased mainly to cover costs for compliance with the Sustainable Ground Water Management Act (SGMA). The proposed revenue increases are 20 percent in year one, 10 percent in year two, then four percent for each year, three through five.

Overall wastewater revenue needs to be increased to keep up with inflation and provide funding for an estimated $11.8 million in deferred maintenance and repair at the wastewater treatment plant. The proposed revenue increases are four percent per year for each ofthe five planning years.

As noted at the April 6, 2023, City Council meeting when the rate study was presented, the increase for industrial users is significant based on their proportional share of costs. The result is that industrial rates are increased much more than domestic. In fact, for wastewater, domestic rates are held mostly constant.

Two resolutions are proposed. The first resolution (Attachment A) approves the rates. The water rates are embedded in Exhibit A to that resolution and the sewer rates are embedded in Exhibit B.

The second resolution addresses the low-income discount which is included for water rates in the Rate Study. As you know, revenues generated from the user fees and charges of the Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds may only be used for operation of the those systems. In that regard, the City has historically provided a discount on water rates for qualifying low-income customers. The Rate Study provides that "Qualifying Low Income customers receive the first 6TG free of charge, then pay beginning with the 6-30 TG Rate." The cost of the low-income water discount program must be paid to the Water Fund from non-rate revenues.

Attached is a resolution approving the Low-Income Water Rate Discount Program with payment for such cost to be made from the General Fund to the Water Fund. The Low-Income Water Discount Program will be paid from the General Fund to the Water Fund prior to the end of each hscal year. At the end of each fiscal year commencing June 30,2024, the City shall review its budget for the following fiscal year and include an estimated amount for payment to the Water Fund For the Low-Income Water Rate Discount Program. The estimated amount for FY 2023 -2024 is $35,000.

BACKGROUND:

The Water and Sewer Funds are ooenterprise funds" operated by the city. Accordingly, they are operated as businesses, such that revenue is adequate to cover expenses, and further, that general fund income is not diverted keep enterprise funds whole. These Funds may not be used for general fund purposes. The City Council has the authority to adjust enterprise funds rates through the Proposition 218 process, whereas general fund increases typically come through a vote of the people to increase taxes. 343
Proposition 218 requires that rates are set proportional to the cost to serve each customer class, that customers are sent notices with reasoning and the opportunity to protest, and that a rate hearing is set to count protests. The analysis in the rate study provides the city the reasoning needed to adjust rates.

The last water and wastewater rate changes for the city were over 15 years ago. Remarkably, revenue from the previous rates has been mostly adequate to cover expenses over the years; however, many deferred maintenance projects exist, especially atthe wastewater plant. Further, for the water enterprise, compliance with SGMA is expensive, as discussed below.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Reasoning for the recommended rate changes is summarized below

1. The proposed rates create revenue equity across customer classes.

2. Revenue must be increased for water primarily to cover SGMA costs, fully one-third of present revenue over each of the next five years.

3. Revenue from wastewater must be increased to keep up with inflation.

4. Industrial wastewater revenue must be increased to cover a cost component for $l 1.8 million in deferred maintenance and improvements (but not expansion).

5. Revenue from both water and wastewater must be adequate to cover expenses and meet bond covenant requirements, specifically the debt service coverage requirement that net revenue must be20 percent higher than the annual debt service payments. (This is not projected to happen for water during FY23.)
FISCAL IMPACT:

Projected revenue, expenses, and fund balances for water and wastewater are shown on pages 29 and 34, respectively, of the rate study. The 20 percent increase in water in the first year, FY23-24, increases revenue $618,000, which is necessary to cover projected expenses and assure compliance with bond covenants. The four percent increase for wastewater in the first year increases revenue $210,000, again to cover expenses and assure compliance with bond covenants.

ALTERNATIVES:

City council may elect to continue the rate hearing or may elect to approve reduced increases or phase in the rates after July 1 or decide not to approve the proposed increases.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

With City Council approval, the revised water and sewer rates will become effective with the first full water metering cycle following July 1,2023.
344
ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION APPROVING NEW WATER AND SEWER

RATES INCLUDING EXHIBITS A FOR WATER AND B FOR
SEWER
345
RESOLUTTON NO. 2023 -a

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANGER RATIT"TING THE PROPOSITION 2I8 PROCESS
RELATING TO INCRE,ASED WATER AT\D WASTEWATER
(SEWER) SERVICE CHARGES AI\D ADOPTING MONTHLY

WATER RATES AND WASTEWATER (SEWER) RATES TO BE

CHARGED FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER FURNISHED BY
THE CITY FOR A FIVE-YEAR PERIOD EFFECTIVE JULY I,2023
WHEREAS, the City of Sanger ("City") operates municipal water and wastewater (sewer) utilities providing service to residential, commercial and industrial customers within the City's service area; and
WHEREAS, the City last set water rates in Resolution No. 3761, approved July 7, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, the City last set wastewater rates in Resolution No. 3952, approved May 3,2007; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed regular meeting on April 6, 2023, the City Council conducted a public meeting and considered a Water and Wastewater Financial Analysis and Rate Study (hereafter "Rate Study") prepared by IGService a firm with expertise in the analysis of municipal utility costs; and
WHEREAS, at the April 6, 2023, meeting the City Council authorized the commencement of the Proposition2lS process; and
WHEREAS' the City prepared and mailed a 45-day notice of public hearing to affected parcel owners of record for each identified parcel upon which the increased water and sewer rates are being proposed served by the City as required by Proposition2lS; and WHEREAS, the notice of public hearing included information on how and where to protest the proposed increase in water service rates and proposed sewer service rates and the notice was developed in accordance with Proposition 218; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2023, the City Council conducted the Proposition 218 hearing and heard a staff report including fuither explanations and calculations as set forth in the Rate Study and an Addendum to the Rate Study, received public testimony, received protests; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Council received a staff report including further explanations and calculations as set forth in the Rate Study and an Addendum to the Rate Study; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing all those persons wishing to be heard were afforded 346
an opportunity to be heard, and the City Council considered any and all written protests concerning the proposed rate increases; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing the City did not receive written or verbal protests from a majority of the identified parcels that would be subject to the proposed rate increases; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of the proposed water and sewer rates is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under California Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8); and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to proceed with the adoption of new water rates and sewer rates.

NOW THERE,FORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER DOES HEREBY RESOLVE:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference.

Section 2. The Council finds the water rates and sewer rates are supported by an appropriate Water Study and Addendum which is incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The Council finds that no majority protest was presented against the proposed water rates and the proposed sewer rates.

Section 4. The Council finds the adoption of the proposed water and sewer rates is exempt from CEQA under California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b) (8).

Section 5. The Council hereby adopts the water rates set as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The water rates shall become effective July 1, 2023. Rates for each subsequent fiscal year shall automatically take effect on July 1 ofthat fiscal year. Specifically, the rates shall be effective each fiscal year with the first full water metering cycle following July l.

Section 6. The Council hereby adopts the wastewater (sewer) rates as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The rates shall become effective July 1, 2023. Rates for each subsequent fiscal year shall automatically take effect on July 1 of that fiscal year. Specifically, the rates shall be effective each fiscal year with the first full water metering cycle following July 1.

Section 7. All resolutions in conflict with this resolution are repealed.

Section 8. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Resolution and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective ofthe fact that anyone or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be 347
declared invalid or unconstitutional
Section 9. This resolution is effective upon adoption.

The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council of the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on June 15, 2023 and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN
ABSENT:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padron, City Clerk
348
EXHIBIT *AD
ProDosed water rates are shown in the table below. The total water service monthly charge includes the Fixed Monthly Charge plus the Volumetric Rate multiplied by the quantity of water used.

Cityd SarqerWater Rates and Charges
Current Rates
Propoeed Rates
7nt2a24 7t1t2025
10ah 4Yo
7t1t2023 TnQOn 7ttn27
c Ratcs ($lTG) Effective
7t1t2UA
Percent
Change New Rate 4o/o 4lo
Single-Family
UptoGTG
6to30TG
30 to 100 TG
100 to 500 TG
Above 500 TG

90.43 $0 71
$1.10
$1.16
$1.29
$0 93
$1.14
$0.93
$0.59
29Vo
29Yo
29%o
$0.55
$0.s2
$1.42
s1 42
$1.42
$0.93
$1.37
$0 93
$1.54
$0.61
$1.01
$1.56
$1.56
$1.56
$1.02
$1.51
$1.02
$1.69
$0"63
s1.05
$1 62
$1.62
$1.62
$1.06
$1 57
$1.06
$1.76
$0 66
$1.09
$1.68
$1.68
$1 6B
$1.10
$1.63
$ t,10
$1 83
$0 69
$1.13
$1 75
$1,75
$1.75
$1.14
$'1.70
$1.14
$1.S0
ulti-Far*ly (Al Volumes) vh
20Yo
V/o
161o1o
Sclrools (All Volumes)
(AlVolurrs!
ndlFood Processing (A I Volumes)
d MonthlyChargcs ($lMo)
Single-Family
Qualifying Low lncorne
5lB x 3l4" meter
l" meter
AII Other Customers
5lB x 314" meter
1" mder

1.5" meter
2" meter
3" lVbter
4" ilbter
6" li/bter
8" lvbter
$10 19
$12.46
s24.27
V/o
V/o
flo
8lo
V/o
Vlo
v
V/o
0?o
vh
lYo
lATo
$10.19
$12.46
$24.27
$11.21
$13.71
$26.70
$1't.66
$14.26
$27.77
$12.13
$14 83
$2B.BB
$12.62
$15.42
s30.04
$12.46
s24.27
$62 32
$s9.69
$186.92
$311 53
$623.06
$1,090.34
$12.46
$24.27
$6232
$99.69
$186.92
$311.53
$623.06
$1,090 34
$13 71
$26.70
$68.55
$109.66
s205.61
$342.68
$685.37
$1,19S.37
$14.26
$27 77
$71 29
$114.05
$213.83
$356.39
$712.78
sl,247.U
$t4.83
$28.88
$74.14
$118.61
$2?2.38
$370.65
$741.29
y,n7.23
$15.42
$30.04
$n.11
$123 35
$231 28
$385.48
$77A.%
$1,349 12
Existing Customers tVlthout Meters $34 63 $38.0S $41.90 $43.58 $45.32 s47,13 ers outside the ctty limits were previansly charged a premium for service. This additional charge is removed in the proposed rates. e single-family tiered.ates are presently applicable to all custorners, o{cept that abore 500 TG for in&strial is $0.51 per TG. Where "AlVolumes" is indicated Current Rates, lhe values shcllvn are the average of lhe eristing liered rates charged for each customer group" Tiaed rates are eliminated, excepl for single- ilv
mimimum meter size presently installed is 1 inch. The smaller A8'x 34" meters are no longa installed g Low lncorne customers rec€ive lhe flrst 6 TG kee of charge, then pay begnning wilh ihe 6 - 30 TG rate, 349
City of Sanger Present and Proposed Sewer Rates
Propog.dll1l27
Change Per Month
4o/o
4o/o
$37.32
$41.45
$/rG
$3.78
$4.33
$4.89
4o/o
4%
4o/o
Minimum
Monthly
$41.4s
$41.4s
$41.4s
Per Student per Month
4o/o
4%
$1.04
$1.51
+ir"
4%
4o/o
$2.502
$223.48
$335.97
Notes:

1. lndustrial rates are se{ based on potable water me(ered, which is 14 perceril higher than metered influent inio the wastetvErter plant based on Fy2'llz2. planning years.

Proposed 7/1126
Change PerMonth
Oo/o $35.88
Oo/o $39.86
Minimum
Monthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
Oo/o
Oo/o
Oo/o
$/TG
$3.63
$4.1 6
$4.70
Per Student per Montlr
Oo/o
o%
$1.00
$1.4s
4o/o
4o/o
40/6
$2.406
$214.88
$323.04
Proposed Z'll25
Change PerMonth
Oo/o
Oo/o
$35.88
$39.86
Qo/o
Qo/o
Oo/o
VTG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Minimum
Monthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
Oo/o
Oo/o
Per Sludent per Month
$1.00
$1.4s
+it"
4%
4%
$2.313
$206.62
$:110.62
Ptopo*d711124
Change Per Month
o%
Oo/o
$3s.88
$39.86
Oo/o
Oo/o
ook
$/TG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Minimum
Monthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
Qo/o
Qo/o
$1.00
$1.45
Per Sludent per Month
40k
4o/o
4o/o
$2.224
$198.67
$298.67
PtoposEd 711123
Change Per Month
Oo/o $35.88
Qo/o $39.86
Oo/o
o%
Qo/o
VTG
$3.63
$4.1 6
$4.70
Minimum
Monthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
Per Student per Month
ENed
ENed
$1.00
$1.4sOo/o
72%
298o/o
148o/o
Ended
s2.14
$191.m
$287.19
Pr€sent
Per Month
$3s.88
$39.86
$/TG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Minimum
Monthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
Per Student per Month
$0.84
$1.08
NewRate
$1.45
Vaiable
$1.241
$48.00
$1 16.00
Catcgory of Service
All Single-Family ReCdences and Mutti-
Family per unit
0 - 6,000 gallons per month
Abow 6,000
Commereial
Normal: 0 - 250 mg/l BOD
Medium: 251 - 500 mg/l BOD
High: Abo\e 500 mg/l BOD
K-12 without Catsteria
K-l2 wilh Cafieteria
Elementary Schools
Middle and Schools
lndustrial Ratesr'2
Fixed Monthly Fee
Flo$r, perTG metered potable
BOD, perthousand lbs
Suspended Solids, perthousand lbs
ii:r-t9P F JIF
t 5 6tg:5! to
H-AIEo<!?tso: i. u t,-
s'G g lsiiE-19*d.ol-:
r:5 l*N o -'loo 5 !lp)+re4
-=orai
= .).; c,
o *li T5;iv
=q*S.S+-t
H Fo=ooo+
BE*5I'{ PF
=.(D Fi q
FI afE9gxigE'?ooxiF:567a*E
-aJ^QY.5'-
d q€ glX. : F;IH
K 9 gIE
fomlr.'o ?--o LA OIW
a'E Eq: =o
T tr+g-o o
d90-i:idoag $)

8.H E
56 ?o:v t-'0 -:d
&5 8
A+d
5ada X.-tr $\a
*E:3Fq()rfO
ADF
e,9u)IJF
P(DO: a'=
[email protected] F9
a6=.u^*;-r. Y (D
PA
-J-.oitr=i
sF&
350
ATTACHMENT 2

RESOLUTION APPROVING LOW-INCOME WATER

DISCOUNT PROGRAM
351
RESOLUTTON 2023-JD

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER
APPROVING A LOW.INCOME WATER RATE PROGRAM FOR LOW.INCOME

CUSTOMERS AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FROM GENERAL FUND TO WATER

FUND FOR SUCH DISCOUNTS
WHEREAS, the City of Sanger is a municipality under the laws of the State of California where revenues are derived and generated for the benefit and the common good of the residents of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City owns and operates the City's Water System, and operates it as an enterprise account; and
WHEREAS, revenues generated from the user fees and charges of the Water Enterprise Account (o'Water Fund") may only be used for operation of the water system; and WHEREAS, the City has historically provided a discount on water rates for qualifuing low-income customers; and
WHEREAS, the Water and Wastewater Enterprise Financial Analysis and Rate Study dated April 6, 2023, which is the basis for proposed water and sewer rate increases includes aNote on Page 34 which states: "Qualifring Low Income customers receive the first 6TG free of charge, then pay beginning with the 6-30 TG Rate"; and
WHEREAS, the cost of the low-income water discount program must be paid to the Water Fund from non-rate revenues; and
WHEREAS, it in the public interest of the City and its residents to approve a Low-Income Water Rate Discount Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to memorialize the City's obligation to pay for the cost of the Low-Income Water Rate Discount Program from non-rate revenues.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Sanger resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. Based on the foregoing recitals and the administrative record, the Council finds:

A. It is in the public interest of the City and its residents to approve a Low-Income Water Discount Program.

B. The Council approves a Low-Income Water Rate Discount Program.

C. Low-Income Water Discount Program will be paid from the General Fund to the Water Fund prior to the end of each fiscal year.

Page I of 2
352
D. At the end of each fiscal year commencing June 30, 2024,the City shall review its budget for the following fiscal year and include an amount for payment to the Water Fund For the Low-Income Water Rate Discount Program.

SECTION 3. The City Manager and Finance Director are authorized to implement the Low-Income Water Rate Discount Program.

The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council of the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on June 15, 2023 and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:

Rebeca Padron, City Clerk
Page2 of2
353
ATTACHMENT 3

RATE STUDY
354
Olcservice
sttl,i iirtt t:,. t l : li lur,'r : i l'i
Water and Wastewater Enterprise
Financial Analysis and Rate Study
For
City of Sanger
April 6,2023
Dan Bergmann, P.E.

Principal
15Shasfa Lane,WalnutCreek,CA 94597 Office:925-946-9090 Cell: 925-899-2578 Email: [email protected] 355
Water and Wastewater Enterprise FinancialAnalysis and Rate Study for
City of Sanger
l. Summary..............
ll. Purpose
lll. Approach to Setting Rates
Water Rate Study
lV. Water Revenue, Expense, and Fund Balance.....

V. Existing Water Rates
Vl. Water Volumes and Revenues by Customer Group.

Vl l. Water Cost-of-Seruice Analysis
Vlll. Water Rate Setting
lX. Water Production vs Billed Water........

X. Water Rate Comparisons......

Xl. Water Conclusion
Wastewater Rate Study
Xll. Wastewater Revenue, Expense, and Fund Balance
Xlll. Existing Wastewater Rates
XlV.Wastewater Volumes and Revenues by Customer Group........

XV. Wastewater Plant Deferred Maintenance and Capital Repair Needs........

XVl. Wastewater Cost-of-Service Analysis
XVll. Wastewater Rate Setting
XVlll. Wastewater Comparisons............

XlX. Wastewater Conclusion
ATTACHMENTS ..........

A. Water Revenue, Expenses, and Fund Balance
B. Water Costof-Service lnputs...

C. Water Revenue Requirement Allocation Table
D. Water Rate Setting Detail: Fixed Monthly and Volumetric Rates.........

E. Water Rate Table Proposed
F. Wastewater Revenue, Expenses, and Fund Balance
..,4
...5
...5
...6
...6
...7
...9
.11
.14
.16
.17
.18
.18
.18
.19
.20
.22
.23
.25
.26
.28
.29
.30
.31
.32
.33
.34
.35

Page 2 ends

356
G
H
Wastewater Cost-of-Service Allocation : Domestic vs. I ndustrial Wastewater Revenue Requirement Allocation Table .................

Wastewater (Sewer) Proposed Rate Table.

Wastewater I nd ustrial Plant I mprovements ....
.36
.37
.38
.39J.

Page 3 ends

357
l. Summary
Sanger's water rates were last approved in 2005, and sewer (also "wastewater" in this study) rates in 2007. The existing rates for both utilities have been adequate to cover expenses for 15 years, but finally expenses have caught up with revenue such that rates need to be increased.

The biggest factor overall are the new costs to bring the city into compliance with the Sustainable Ground Management Act (SGMA). Over the next five years, SGMA costs will average $1 million per year, fully onethird of present revenue from water ratepayers. Additional increases are needed for both water and wastewater to keep up with inflation.

The work in this study follows cost-of-service (COS) methodology according to A\AMA Manual Ml, "Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charge." This is important for compliance with the requirements of California's Proposition 218, such that each customer class pays its proportion of the cost to provide services, whether water or wastewater.

The most significant result of this study for both water and wastewater is the imbalance of revenue between domestic-side customers, both residential and commercial, and the industrialcustomers in Sanger. The COS results revealthat very large increases are needed for industrial customers, especially for wastewater treatment. Additionally, the industrial side of the wastewater plant has extensive deferred maintenance, resulting in additional needed revenue from industrial customers, after the COS adjustment. The deferred maintenance needs are detailed in an attached memorandum from AM Consulting Engineers. This study does not include costs for expanding capacity to either the water or wastewater operations.

For water rates, this study recommends that tiered water rates are retained only for single-family residents, and flat rates are used for all other customers. The base monthly charges for water are maintained at the existing level, whereas the revenue increases needed are accomplished though increases to the volume component only. This is done to reward conservation and to shift the revenue balance somewhat from fixed charges to variable charges.

For wastewater rates, the existing rate structure is basically retained, such that residential customers continue to receive a slightly lower rate if water consumption is less than six thousand gallons (TG) per month. lndustrial rates, after being increased, are also rebalanced such that more of the wastewater rate burden is associated with concentration of discharge, and less with volume, thereby rewarding industrialcustomers if they are able to reduce the concentration being delivered to the wastewater plant.

Considering the magnitude of COS increases to industrial customers, increased by maintenance needs at the plant, it is critical for city staff to coordinate this rate change process carefully with industrial customers.

Page 4 ends

358
ll. Purpose
The purpose of this cost-of-service rate study is to evaluate the water and wastewater enterprise fund revenues, expenses, and fund balances to reset rates such that revenue is adequate for safe and reliable operation into the future. The approach to setting rates is outlined in this study.

This work complies with the requirements of California's Proposition 218 when raising water and wastewater rates. ln general, this means:
o A rate study is conducted to support the revenue needed for the enterprise fund. . Each customer group pays its proportionate share of costs. . Revenue from rates is used only for the specific fund's purposes. . Customers are notified in writing of the rate increases, the reasons increases are needed, information about the rate hearing that will be held after 45 days, and that they may protest in writing.
. lf more than 50 percent of customers (parcel owners) protest, the increase may not happen.
lll. Approach to Setting Rates
This work is conducted in the following sequential steps:

1. Audited financials are reviewed to observe history of revenues, expenses, and changing fund balances.

2. Accounting reports are reviewed to bridge the time frame between the end of the last audit into the current fiscal year. The budget is reviewed for the current fiscal year and next fiscal year, when available.

3. Operating expense projections are developed for the next five years, referred to as the "planning period."

4. Billing data is related for all billing cycles, including all customers from the most recent complete fiscal year. Billing data is reconciled to audited financial values and accounting reports to assure good data for rate setting.

5. Billing data is divided into appropriate customer classes to determine revenue collected from each customer class.

6. Cost-of-service modeling is done to assign overall costs between defined customer classes, based on system costs to serve each customer class.

Page 5 ends

359

7. A rate model is constructed to achieve projected revenue needed based on the cost-of-service results. The rate model demonstrates that established rates achieve the revenue needed for each customer class.

L Reasonableness testing is done for specific customer usage profiles, comparing existing to proposed monthly and annual charges.

Water Rate Studv
lV. Water Revenue, Expense, and Fund Balance
Revenues, expenses, and fund balances are shown in the table in Attachment A. The table shows historicalaudited data for FY18/19, FY19120,FY20121, and unaudited data forFY21l22 provided from trial balance reports. The values for FY22l23 are based on data to date for this fiscal year and the budget for the year. The expense values for the five-year planning period, FY23l24 through FY27l28 are forecasted based on input from staff and reasonable estimates of inflation.

The revenue increases needed are determined by two factors. The first is adequate revenue after paying all operating costs to meet the debt service coverage requirement (net revenue available for debt service must be greater than 1.20 times the amount of debt service). The second, that available cash maintains a reasonable level during the five-year planning period. The bottom section of the table shows allocations of total available cash, distinguishing restricted fund money for DBCP Carbon Replacement.

Focusing specifically on revenue, overall revenue from water rates over the past few years has been consistent at just over $3.0 million per year. Revenues from late fees decreased during Covid since the city was not charging late fees during that period. Revenues from interest also decreased with interest rates but is projected to increase as interest rates increase. Revenues from impact or development fees are excluded from rate planning.

Historically, water expenses were flat through 2017 allowing the existing rate structure to stay in place since 2010. After 2017, overall expenses began to increase, decreasing the amount of revenue remaining after debt service payments. During FY22123, the combination of increasing costs and $582,400 of payments for replacement groundwater have prevented the water enterprise from achieving the required debt service coverage.

Costs imposed by the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), both for administration and to purchase groundwater recharge, are significant to the water enterprise.

Over the five-year planning period for rate setting, the average cost for SGMA compliance is projected to average approximately $1 million per year. This new cost component alone represents a 30 percent increase above existing revenue from current rates.

Other cost increases include $190,000 per year starting in FY23l24 to fund two water operators and a portion of a clerk position. Overall inflationary increases are set at four and five percent

Page 6 ends

360
over the five-year planning period. ln Lieu Taxes are held constant at $103,000 per year. (ln Lieu taxes and Utility User Taxes are not considered in this rate study).

The water enterprise has outstanding bond debt associated with the Series 2022A bond refinance, following the previous Series 2013 bonds. The principal amount of the bonds is $3,817,000, with payments until 2043. Annual bond payments are shown in Attachment A, averaging $240,000 per year during the rate study planning period. Debt service is just six percent, which is relatively low, compared to revenue (increasing to $4 million per year), and especially when compared to the sewer enterprise addressed later in this report.

Available Cash is cash available and unrestricted for operating expenses. As of July 2022, total cash is approximately $6.S million; however, of that total, approximately $3.6 million is restricted for DBCP Carbon Replacement, leaving approximately $2.9 million unrestricted. The DBCP fund amount decreases over the planning period based on already planned expenditures for carbon replacement. DBCP carbon replacement is not shown as an operating expense because associated costs are covered by the available restricted funds. Capital expenditures over the planning period are shown at $200,000 peryear, a relatively low amount, to limitthe rate increases required and maintain available cash.

Resolution No.4427, dated August 1, 2013, sets the utility reserve funds at three months of operations costs. Accordingly, based on operating costs of $4 million per year, three months' operations would be $1 million in reserve. This is achieved presently with the $2.9 million, and projected balances going forward. The increase in revenue requirement is set to increase available cash over the five-year planning period.

Finally, the amount of revenue from rates is increased 20 percent in the first year, FY23124, then 10 percent in the second year, and four percent each year for the last three. The larger increases are needed in the first two years to fully cover increasing expenses, driven by SGMA, and to achieve required debt service coverage. The remaining three increases are to keep up with projected inflation. These are minimum recommended increases to cover expenses and achieve debt service coverage. The debt service coverage ratios achieved in the revenue setting and expense projections are relatively tight. lt will be prudent for staff to monitor expenses to assure debt service coverage is achieved.

V. Existing Water Rates
Sanger's existing water rates were approved by Resolution No. 3761, on July 7,2005. Pursuant to the Resolution, those rate were increased each year through FY10/11 according to the Consumer Price lndex. The result is that the existing rates have been in place for over 12 years without any further increases or modification.

Rates for monthly water sales consist of a fixed monthly base charge that increases with meter size, plus five-tiered volume of use rates that apply to all customers. The existing base charges

Page 7 ends

361
and tiered rates are shown in the tables below and illustrated in the bar chart. As a note, the city is no longer issuing 5/8" x 3/4" meters; however, smaller customers using them are allowed to continue to benefit from the associated lower base charge.

Monthly Water Base Charge
Meter Size (lnches) Base Rate
5l8x3l4 $12.46

1.0 $24.27

1.5 $62.32

2.0 $99.69

3.0 $186.92

4.0 $311.53

6.0 $623.06

8.0 $1,090.34
Tiered Quantity Rates
$1.29
$1.10 $1.16
$0.71
$0.51
$0.43
I
Up to 6 TG 6 to 30 30 to 100 100 to 500 Abore 500 Abore 500 (lndustrial)
The existing rate structure allows a Utility User Tax (UUT) exemption and rate discount for qualifying low-income residents. Specifically, qualiffing low-income residents do not pay the UUT and do not pay for the first six thousand gallons of water, presently valued at $2.58 per month, based on $0.43 per thousand gallons. Further, they pay $10.19 per month base charge, instead Water Quantity Tiers
Thousand Gallons per Month (TG)
Tiered Rates
$/TG
0-6 $0.43
6-30 $0.71
30 - 100 $1.10
100 - 500 $1.16
Above 500 $1.29
Above 500 (lndustrial) $0.51

Page 8 ends

362
of $12.46. During FY21122, approximately 530 residential customers benefited from these discounts.

The existing water rates specify a 25 percent premium for water service outside the city limits. As of June 2022, only two customers are on this rate. The existing water rates also specify rates for customers being served without meters, of which there are approximately seven customers.

Vl. Water Volumes and Revenues by Customer Group
Annual revenue from rates and annual quantities are shown in the following two pie charts.

Revenue and quantities for single-family homes is the largest. Revenue from the industrial sector is proportionally lower than volume for the industrial sector, which is a result of 76 percent of volume metered to the industrial sector being above 500 TG per month and billed at $0.51 per TG.

Annual Water Revenue ($)
lndustrial
$264,381 8%
Com/Other
$301 ,085 10%
Schools
$236,079 8%
Multi-Family
$250,199 8% Single-Family
$2,036,256
66%
Annual Water Volumes
(TG)
lndustrial
406,50422%
Gom/Other
109,190 6%
Schools
119,659 70/o
Single-Family
1,064,991 58%
Multi-Family
127 ,Q33 70/o

Page 9 ends

363
The bar chart below shows the allocation of revenue from rates from each customer class, divided between base revenue and volume revenue. lt is worth noting that customers range from 42 percent to 66 percent base revenue, except that the industrials are only 10 percent base revenue.

This is because a very large volume of water passes through industrial meters, relative to the meter size and monthly base rate. Conversely, when less water passes through meters relative to the meter cost, the base cost proportion increases, as with the other customers groups. ln fact, 58 percent of overall revenue is from base monthly rates, more than half of overall revenue.

Base Revenue vs Volume Revenue
1Qlo/o
9Qo/o
80o/o
70%
600/o
50%
40o/o
3Qo/o
20%
10o/o
0o/o
Single-Family Multi-Family Schools Com/Other lndustrial The table of water meters by customer type is shown below. Many single-family customers still have the smaller 518" x 3/4" meters. The table also shows that the large count of commercial meters, most of which are smaller meters (detail shown in attachments). Finally, there are just nine industrial meters, of which usage is concentrated on a few of them.

Water Meters by Customer Type
As of June 2022
Single-Family 518" x314" 3,000
Single-Family 1" 3,300
Single Family Total'
Multi-Family less than 6 units 177
Multi-Family 6 or more units 50
Multi-Family Total
Schools
Commercial/Other
lndustrial
Total
" Allocation between meter sizes is estimated
6,300
227
395
53 I
6,984
47%
34io
i ii " .
58o/o
34o/o
9Qo/o

Page 10 ends

364
Vll. Water Cost-of-Service Analysis
A cost-of-service analysis was done using a simplified A\ AruA approach, considering the small size of Sanger's water system. The cost elements considered were 1) Volume costs allocated as a function of quantity metered, 2) Capacity costs allocated as a function of summer peaking demand, 3) SGMA costs specifically, as a function of quantity metered, and 4) Customer services and billing costs allocated as a function of customer count. Distribution costs were not separated because distribution and production functions are combined in the water system, not separated by distinct transmission pipelines. The cost functions allocated are based on FY23124. the first year of the five-year planning period.

Sanger's water customers had not previously been placed in rate classes or customer groups, except for the fifth-tier rate reduction for industrial customers. This study defines the five rate classes shown in the bar chart below, which are Single-Family, Multi-Family, Schools, Commercial/Other, and lndustrial. The purpose for defining customer classes is to group customers with similar usage patterns, considering the size of the water system. The cost-of- service analysis then calculates the cost to serve each class and compares to existing revenue from customers in each defined class.

Regarding cost allocation, costs assigned for SGMA are allocated evenly based on volume consistent with the cost to the city for SGMA compliance. Costs for customer services and billing are weighted more to customers with lower water consumption compared to meter size.

Accordingly, higher customer services and billing cost (per unit metered) are assigned to single- family and commercial, and very low billing costs are assigned to industrials. Peaking costs are weighted more heavily toward summer peaking customers such as single-family and schools, caused by summer irrigation demand. The remaining cost components not separated out are assigned to the volume-related area and based on volume only to each customer group.

Peaking costs are determined first by the percentage of annual water production that exceeds the system monthly average. For Sanger, this amount is 11 percent, as shown in the graph below.

Next, 11 percent of the total cost-of-service is classified as total peaking costs. The resultant amount is assigned to the customer classes based on summer peaking factors for each group.

The outcome is some additional costs are assigned to customers peaking in the summer, as those customers need more capacity in the water system to meet their seasonal demand. The detail of the calculation is shown in Attachment2.

Page 1 ends

365
Monthly Average vs. Peaking Volumes
2s0,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
E
P
co
(9
F
System monthly average
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
The overall results of the cost-of-service results are consistent between customer classes as described here.

The average cost per TG for Single-Family is slightly higher than the proposed system average cost. lt is higher because of the customer services and peaking cost allocations.

The average cost for Multi-Family is lower than Single-Family. This is primarily because Multi-Family has a lower peaking cost than Single-Family.

The cost for Schools is the highest. This is because of the summer peaking cost associated with irrigation.

Commercial/Other is close to the average of the others (excepting lndustrial). This is because Commercial/Other is a combination of all remaining customers, including many small commercial accounts.
lndustrial is significantly below the proposed system average. This is because lndustrial has the lowest peaking cost, and very low relative customer service billing cost.

The results are illustrated in the bar chart and data table below, and the modeling calculations are shown in Attachments B and C.
a
a
a
a
1 1% ofsystem
volumes are
above the
monthly average

Page 12 ends

366
Sanger Water Enterprise: Cost of Service vs Present Contribution by Group $3.00
$2,50
r Cust Svcs & Billing
$2.00 r Peaking
rvolume Related
Is,uo
$1.00
mGround Water Recharge
(sGMA)
- - Proposed Average
$0.50
I Present By Group
- - - Present Average FY22l23
$0.00
Single-Family Multi-Family Schools Com/Other lndustrial City of Sanger Water Enterprise Revenue Requirement Allocation Table (FY23124) Total Single- Multi- Schools Com/Other lndustrialFam
Volume Related
Ground Water Recharge (SGMA)
Peaking
Cust Svcs. & Billing
Revenue Requirement
Adjustments
Excess/(Deficiency) of Funds
Quantity Delivered (TG)
Average by Class ($/TG)
$3,706,000 $2,239,107 $2s2,090 $261,995 $233,242
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Adjusted Revenue Requirement $3,706,000 $2,239,107 $252,090 $261,995 $239,242 Revenue at Present Rates $3,088,000 $2,036,256 $2S0,199 $236,079 $30j,0S5 $2,0s9,340
$1,000,000
$407,660
$239,000
($618,000)
20o/o
1,827 ,377
$2.03
$1,200,178
$582,798
$280,025
$1 76,1 05
($202,851)
10o/o
1,064,991
$2.10
$1 43,1 58
$69,517
$20,379
$19,036
($1,est I
1o/o
127,033
$1.98
$134,848
$65,481
$57,221
$4,445
($25,e16)
1 1o/o
119,659
$2.1 9
$123,050
$59,752
$17,315
$33,125
$67,843
-23o/o
1 09,1 90
$2.14
$458,1 05
$222,452
$32,720
$6,289
$719,567
$0
$719,567
$264,381
($455,1 86)
172%
406,504
$1.77

Page 13 ends

367
The most significant finding from the cost-of-service analysis is that the existing revenue contribution per unit sold from the industrial customers is far below the other customer groups. This is because the fifthtier rate for industrial use over 500 TG per month is discounted to $0.51 per TG. As stated above, 76 percent of industrial sales, most industrial water, has been for volumes over 500 TG per month. The present overall contribution from industrial customers is $0.65 per TG, which just 38 percent of the existing overall average sales rate of $1.69. This result not only reveals that industrial rates have been disproportionately low, but that other customer groups have been subsidizing the cost of service for industrial customers.

A second notable result is that the existing overall contribution from commercial customers is shown significantly higher than the cost-of-service results. This is primarily because there are many commercial meters in proportion to the amount of water flowing through them, sometimes required to meet fire flow requirements.

Regarding single-family customers, though the overall revenue increase needed for the water enterprise is 20 percent, the amount assigned to single-family is just 10 percent in the first year.

This is because the cost-of-service result assigns more of the revenue increase burden to industrials. The same result also true for the other domestic-side rate classes in differing amounts.

Vlll. Water Rate Setting
The goal of rate setting is to establish a combination of base rates and volume rates that reasonably achieve the cost-of-service revenue requirements for each rate class. The proposed rates over the five-year planning period are shown in Attachment E.

Tiered rates are maintained only for single-family customers. Tiered rates are sensible for single- family customers because they are more similar to each other than are customers in the other rate classes. Further, single-family homes are summer peaking due to irrigation demand.

Continuing to utilize increasing tiered rates benefits customers that conserve water for irrigation.

Further, the volumes in the existing tiers are appropriately set, as illustrated in the bar chart below.

Specifically, the first tier up to 6 TG covers inside use for most homes. The second tier up to 30 TG covers additional usage, which is mostly irrigation needs. Finally, the remaining tier above 30 TG is generally excessive, representing just eight percent of the bills issued but 24 percent of volume. This is a small number of customers using relatively large volumes of water. The existing rates for the tiers are set to benefit single-family customers for inside use where the first-tier rate is much less than the second tier. This rate spread is maintained in the proposed rates because the existing tiers are reasonable, and it avoids uneven cost increases to different single-family customers. The fourth and fifth tiers are eliminated because single-family homes should never exceed 100 TG in one month. (The data shown above 100 TG per month for single-family is either water leaks, misbill, or extreme water waste.)

Page 14 ends

368
ooo
(.)
ct)
.g
b
o
o3
E
z
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0 Single-Family Customer Water Consumption Distribution Based on FY21l22 Single-Family Billing Data
76,000 Billing Cycles
Median Consumption is
11 TG per Month
rs
and 5 ---'*
(O CD O N S @ @ O C\ rrf @ @ O N t (O (D O N tt (o O O c! S (O € O or F C! N N C\l N c|) c.) (t (v) (f) $ V \f S sf |f) rr) rf) rr, tO (O l* Monthly Volume Ranges (TG)
C\t$
Tier
Tier 2 Tier 3
One volume rate is proposed for all other customers, eliminating tiered rates except for single- family customers. A one volume rate is more logicalfor other customer groups because the size and nature of other customers varies extensively. For example, an apartment on one meter can be a few dwelling units, or it can be 40 dwelling units, causing the water demand to differ substantially regardless on conservation effort. The purpose of tiered rates is to encourage conservation, but some commercial businesses such as restaurants require water for food preparation and dish washing. Tiered rates could inadvertently benefit a smaller restaurant wasting water, while penalizing a larger restaurant conserving water, merely because the larger restaurant serves more customers. As a result, one volume rate is recommended, but a different volume rate from some customer classes.

The overall enterprise revenue increase needed for the FY23l24 planning year is 20 percent as detailed in Section lV. This increase can be achieved through adjustments to volume rates, adjustments to monthly service charges, and revenue shifting between customer classes to achieve cost-of-service reasonableness.

The proposed revised rates hold all monthly service charges as the same level. lnstead of increasing monthly service charges, the entire increase is proposed to be achieved through the volume rate. This is because revenue from monthly service charges is already relatively high at 58 percent, and because placing the needed increase in the volume component will benefit customers with lower water usage, rewarding conservation. The result of assigning the needed

Page 15 ends

369
revenue requirement to the volume component is that the contribution from the monthly service charges declines from 58 percent to 49 percent, still half of all revenue from rates.

Determination of the volumetric rate for each rate class is done in the tables in Attachment D.

The first table shows the unadjusted volume rate calculations matching the cost-of-service results.

The first three volume rates for Single-Family, Multi-Family, and Schools are proposed in the rate schedule without adjustment and consistent with the cost-of-service results. The Volume rate shown for Single-Family is the weighted average rate of the tiers. However, the volume rates for Commercial/Other and lndustrial are proposed to be adjusted as shown in the second table.

The second table in Attachment D shows the adjusted results shifting revenue from Commercial/Other to lndustrial. This is done by setting the Commercial/Other volume rate equal to Multi-Family rate as a reasonable proxy rate considering that the cost-of-service volume rate for Commercial/Other is disproportionally low. The rationale is that Commercial/Other and lndustrial both consist primari[ of commerce activities within Sanger. Shifting some of the rate benefit to lndustrial alleviates some of the very large increase being allocated to lndustrial. lX. Water Production vs Billed Water
Water production volumes were compared to billed volumes for FY21122. The result shows 11 percent of measured production was not billed, as shown in the table below.

Produced Water vs Billed Water
Thousand Gallons
Production Billed
226,078 212,934
249,659 2'16,553
236,768 198,993
209,278 144,568
172,046 139,110
126,068 110,374
1 1 1,090 109,029
116,333 97,110
116,940 118,943
139,659 139,864
157,772 153,866
Unbilled
Jul21
Aug-21
Sep-21
Ocl-21
Nov-21
Dec-21
Jan-22
Feb-22
Mar-22
Apr-22
May-22
Jun-22 1 1
2,058,687 1,827 ,377 231,310 11%

Page 16 ends

370
X. Water Rate Comparisons
Sanger's water rates are relatively low compared to neighboring utilities, especially industrial rates as shown in the comparisons below. Even after the COS adjustments, Sanger's rates are still relatively low, compared to others. One significant variable in the rate comparisons is how long it has been since other utilities have adjusted rates, and whether costs for SGMA have been included in rates.

Single-Family Residential Water Cost Comparison
Median Customer at 11,000 Gallons / Month
$70.00
$60.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$0.00
lndustrial Water Cost Comparison
28,500 Thousand Gallons / Month, 8" Meter
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
o**+*"'9 ".$"r*t .S o.C u.f oN u"so"."*i**fr""f
a"""t

Page 17 ends

371
Xl. Water Conclusion
The work of this study has thoroughly analyzed the financial statements, rates, and revenue of Sanger's water enterprise. The body of this study combined with the various attachments provide the supporting data and calculations confirming the results of the study. The recommended modified rate structure provides an improvement from the previous rate structure, specifically, more accurately allocating costs to provide service across reasonable defined rate classes.

Wastewater Rate Studv
Xll. Wastewater Revenue, Expense, and Fund Balance
Wastewater enterprise revenues, expenses, and fund balances are shown in Attachment F.

Similar to the water enterprise study, the table shows historical audited data for FY18/19, FY19120, FY20121, and unaudited data for FY21l22 provided from trial balance reports. The values for FY22l23 are based on data to date for this fiscal year and the budget for the year. The expense values for the five-year planning period, FY23l24 through FY27l28 are forecasted based on input from staff and reasonable estimates of inflation. The revenue increases needed are determined by two factors. First, adequate revenue after paying all operating costs to meet the debt service coverage requirement, which is net revenue available for debt service greater than

1.20 times the amount of debt service. Second, that available cash maintains a reasonable level during the five-year planning period.

Focusing specifically on revenue, overall revenue from wastewater rates over the past few years has been consistent at just over $5.0 million per year. As with water, revenues from late fees decreased during Covid since the city was not charging late fees during that period. Revenues from interest also decreased with interest rates but are projected to increase as interest rates increase. Revenues from impact or development fees are excluded from rate planning.

Overall wastewater revenue has been adequate through FY22l23; however, inflation aligned increases are needed each year during the five-year planning period. For FY23124, an additional operator and a portion of a utility clerk have been added, at an incremental cost of $105,000 to Salaries and Benefits.

Compared to the water enterprise debt burden (approximately $240,000 per year), the debt service burden on wastewater is much greater, at approximately $1.5 million peryearthrough 2036 (Series A, $13,655,000 and Series B, $6,847,000), and then decreasing to approximately $435,000 per year through 2043 (Series B only). Even so, the wastewater enterprise has accumulated a healthy cash fund balance of over $9 million--far exceeding the city's reserve policy. These funds will be useful for future treatment plant replacement, or potentially to repay bond debt.

Page 18 ends

372
Xlll. Existing Wastewater Rates
Sanger's existing wastewater rates were approved by Resolution No. 3952, on May 3, 2007.

Pursuant to the Resolution, those rates were increased each year through FY10/11 according to the Consumer Price lndex. Again, similar to water, the existing wastewater rates have been in place for over 12 years without any further increases or modification.

Residential rates are tiered such that the fixed monthly rate for a single-family dwelling, or for multifamily per unit is $35.98, if water consumption does not exceed six TG per month per unit.

Above six TG, the rate increases to $39.86. Historically, the intent has been to give residential customers with low water usage (and therefore lower wastewater discharge) the benefit of a lower wastewater rate.

All commercial customers pay $39.86 per month, plus a volume rate based on concentration of discharge as determined by Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), which is a measurement of the relative burden placed on the treatment plant for processing wastewater.

Classified Strenqth
"Low"
"Medium"
"High"
Volume
BOD:

TSS:

BOD (mq/L)
0 to 250
251 to 500
Above 500
$1.241 per thousand gallons
$48 perthousand pounds
$1 16 per thousand pounds
Rate ($/TG)
$3.63
$4.1 6
$4.70
lndustrial customers are defined to have an excess in one or more of the following categories during any one of the previous 12 months.
. Flow more than 150 TG per month of wastewater
. BOD in excess of 375 pounds
. Total Suspended Solids (TSS) in excess of 500 pounds
Defined industrial customers pay a volume rate based on a combination of volume, BOD, and TSS, as follows.

Additionally, industrial users are charged a fixed monthly cost based on a formula combining volume, BOD, and TSS.

Schools pay wastewater rates based on the type of school and student count, as follows

Page 19 ends

373
Tvpe of School
Kindergarten or Elementary School
without Cafeteria
Kindergarten or Elementary School
with Gafeteria
Junior High Schoolor High School
Rate per Student per Month
$0.84
$1.08
$1.45
XlV. Wastewater Volumes and Revenues by Customer Group
Volumes of influent into the domestic and industrial sides compared to existing revenues from domestic and industrialcustomers are shown in the pie charts below. lt is meaningfulto note that industrial customers contribute 35 percent of overall influent into the treatment plant while contributing 20 percent of overall revenue. Even so, industrial concentrations are much higher than domestic concentrations. For example, BOD for industrial influent averages approximately 1,700 mg/L and TSS averages 850 mg/L. ln comparison, domestic influent averages 250 mg/L BOD, and similarly 250 mg/L TSS. Significantly, the BOD concentrations of industrial influent are almost seven times higher than domestic influent. lndustrial customers are doing little or no pretreatment of concentrated wastewater d ischarge.

Regarding the domestic-side customer groups only, the revenue percentages closely follow the volume percentages, indicating consistency across customer classes. However, the cost-of- service analysis will evaluate the balance of revenue overall between the domestic and industrial sides to determine if one is subsidizing the other.

Wastewater Plant lnfluent: Domestic vs lndustrial
(MG/Yr, FY21l22)
lndustrial
lnfluent, 311,
35%
Domestic
lnfluent, 576,
65%

Page 20 ends

374
Wastewater Revenue: Domestic vs lndustrial (FY21122)
lndustrial
$1,066,000
2oo/o
Domestic
$4,180,000
8oo/o
Domestic Plant lnfluent: Customer Groups
(MGl/r, FY21l22)
Commercial/Other, 56, 1 0%
Schools, 21, 4%
Multi-Family,
95,16%
Single-Family,
404,70%
Domestic Plant Revenue: Customer Groups (FY21122)
Com/Other $410,000 10%
Schools
$150,000 4%
Multi-Family
$680,000 16%
Single-Family
$2,940,000
7Oo/o

Page 21 ends

375
XV. Wastewater Plant Deferred Maintenance and Capital Repair Needs Sanger's wastewater plant is divided into an industrial side and a domestic side with the exception that both processes share the same anaerobic digestor. A dedicated collection transmission line serves industrial customers, separate from the domestic collection system.

Regarding the industrial side of the facility, a technical memorandum has been prepared by AM Consulting Engineers identifying improvements that are necessary to continue handling current wastewater flows. The memorandum is included as Attachment J, at the end of the report. The memorandum identifies long-term maintenance and improvement needs for most components of the industrial treatment plant, as the plant has operated for many years without significant attention. The following summary list and Probable lmprovement Cost are from the memorandum. See the memorandum for more detail.

Plant Component Probable lmprovement Cost
Headworks $1,550,000
Primary Sedimentation $1,250,000
Primary Sludge Pump Station $165,000
Roughing Filter $230,000
Sludge Thickener (50%) $350,000
Anaerobic Digester (50%) $1,050,000
Aerated Treatment Pond $2,250,000
Storage Ponds $1,600.000
Subtotal $8,445,000
Contingency (15o/o) $1,266,000
Engineering, etc. (10%) $844,500
Construction Administration $1.266.750
Total $11,823,000
For the purpose of the cost-of-service model, if this amount were to be financed over 20 years at an estimated four percent annual interest rate, the annual cost burden to the industrial customers would be $869,957 per year.

Regarding the domestic side of the plant, improvements needed include the domestic share of the sludge thickener and anaerobic digester. The city's 2006 master plan includes improvements such as an expanded headworks, new oxidation ditch, and additional disinfection such as a chlorine contact basin. Additionally, the plant controls system needs to be upgraded. However, based on information from city staff, it is possible that the domestic side of the plant may be fully replaced in the distant future. As a result, domestic side capital repair costs are not considered in resetting domestic rates in this study.

Page 22 ends

376
XVl. Wastewater Cost-of-Service Analysis
A cost-of-service analysis was done for wastewater customers, similar to water. The defined customer groups are the same. However, for wastewater, costs for operating the industrial side of the treatment plant are separated from the domestic side. This is necessary because the plants are mostly separate and because the concentrations of industrial influents are so much higher than domestic. Additionally, costs for operating and maintaining the collection system are assigned to domestic service and are not assigned to industrial customers. Details for functionalize of costs between the domestic side and industrial side are shown in Attachment G, and the detail for allocation of costs to customer classes is shown in Attachment H.

Sewer Enterprise: Cost of Service vs Present Contribution by Group $e.00
$8.00
$7.00
$6.00
oF
@
$5.00
ru Deferred Maintenance and
Capital Replacement Funding
: Existing Debt Service
$4.00 r Operations and Maintenance
$3.00 I Present by Group
- - - PresentAverage$2.00
$1.00
$0.00
^'\\ ;'\\<os. {os' ,""" a""r"t ."""-"
".at"
o\$t*
Generally, costs are assigned proportionalto flow, which is 65 percent domestic and 35 percent industrial, after subtracting amounts allocated to the domestic collection system. lf industrial and domestic treatment were combined, the cost assignment to industrial would need to be much greater because of the high concentration influent. ln fact, the industrial BOD concentration is approximately seven times higher and the TSS concentration approximately three times higher.

However, the plants are separate, and further, the treatment standards for industrial are not as stringent as those for domestic.

After costs are separated between industrial and domestic, costs are further allocated to:

Page 23 ends

377
. Operations and Maintenance
. Existing Debt Service
. Deferred Maintenance and Capital Replacement Funding
Operations and maintenance include all expenses except existing or future replacement funding.

Existing debt consists of ongoing payments on recently refinanced bonds totaling $13.6 million.

The original 1996 bonds were issued for improvement to both the industrial and domestic plant operations as documented in the 2006 Master Plan. Accordingly, existing bond debt is assigned to both the domestic and industrialsides based on volume.

Before adding a cost component for deferred maintenance or future capital replacement, the cost- of-service results reveal a substantial increase to industrials needed and a decrease to domestic customers. ln fact, the present industrial contribution per thousand gallons of influent falls short of the operations and maintenance component alone from the cost-of-service results. The results also show that domestic rates are reasonable compared to each other. The implied overall result, as with water rates, is not only that industrial rates have been disproportionately low, but that domestic customer groups have been subsidizing the cost of service for industrial customers.

Though the results imply an immediate decrease for residential customers, the approach proposed is to maintain domestic rates at their present level until the fifth year, the current rates being reasonable compared to nearby utilities, and to allow the surplus to be contributed toward either eventual domestic side plant replacement or repayment of debt. The domestic portion for deferred maintenance and capital funding of excess revenue as a result of not decreasing rates totals approximately $482,000 for FY23124, then decreasing to zero by the fifth year. The alternative for domestic customers would be to decrease rates, but then increase them again to follow inflationary increases. This is avoided thereby providing ongoing rate stability.

The wastewater fund has accumulated a healthy fund balance over the years, presently totaling over $9 million. As the domestic side has been subsidizing the industrial side, it could be argued that the fund balance belongs to the domestic side; however, this fund balance could also be used to finance industrial-side deferred improvements, to essentially loan it to the industrial side, and thereby avoid some outside finance costs for the industrial deferred maintenance.

The cost component for deferred maintenance and capital replacement funding is shown in the cost-of-service model as an incremental cost. The value shown is the debt service payment assuming the cost was funded over 20 years, as explained above. This value is significant because it is approximately half of the cost increase for industrial customers.

Page 24 ends

378
City of Sanger Sewer Enterprise Revenue Requirenrent Allocation Table Total Single-Family Multi-Family Schools Con/Other lndustrial 576,000 404,460 94,500lnfluent Dornestic (TG/yr)
nt Dornestic %
lnfluent lncluding lndustrial (TG/yr)
lnfluent Combined %
Dom. Op. and Maint.

Dom. Deferred Maintenance
Bond Debt Service
lnd. and Maint.

Revenue Requirernent
Revenue at Present Rates
Excess/(Defi ciency) of Funds
Deferred Maintenance and
Capital Replacernent Funding
$5,456,000 $2,597,036 $606,784 $134,841
lOOo/o
887,000
$2,128,580
$586,294
$1,514,707
404,460
46%
$1,494,662
$411,688
$690,686
94,500
1'lo/o
$349,220
$96,1 89
$161 ,37s
21,000
4o/o
21,000
2o/o
56,040
10%
56,040
60/o
$207,093
$57,041
$9s,698
$359,833
$410,000
311,000
,604
$21,375
$35,861 $531,086
,|
'l
$1,757,506
$1,066,000940 000 150,000
($210,000) $342,964 $73,216 $15,159 $50,167 ($691,506)

4.00o/o -12o/o' -11o/o -10o/o -12% 650/o
$1,351,464 $342,964 $73,216 $15,159 $50,167 $869,9s7
otal Revenue Requirernent
Excess/(Defi ciency) of Funds
$6,807,464 $2,940,000 $680,000
$0 $0
Oo/o 0o/o
$410,000
$0
0o/o
50,000
$0
o%
$1 $2,627,464
($1,561,464)
1460/o
XVll. Wastewater Rhte Setting
The goal of wastewater rate-setting is to establish rates that reasonably achieve the cost-of- service revenue requirements for each rate class. The proposed wastewater rates over the five- year planning period are shown in Attachment l.

As discussed in the cost-of-service section, and based current state of the wastewater enterprise, the recommendation is to hold domestic-side rates constant until the fifth year. This means maintaining the two-tier rate for single-family and multi-family, and maintaining the same commercial rates. The only exception is to consolidate the elementary school rate to one rate from two since cafeteria food preparation has become centralized. lndustrial rates need to be increased substantially, first to achieve a cost-of-service balance with the domestic operation, and second to cover the extensive deferred maintenance described above. Both steps of increase are shown in the cost-of-service bar chart. The rates shown in the rate table are to achieve the cost-of-service balance only.

The rates shown in the table are based on based on potable metered water into industrialfacilities.

A comparison analysis shows that metered water is 14 percent higher than influent into the wastewater plant. The result of using potable water to set rates is that they are 14 percent lower. lf effluent, outflow, measurement is used, rates should be adjusted upward accordingly. lndustrial wastewater rates are divided into components of Volume, BOD, and TSS. Regarding BOD and TSS, customers with higher concentrations of discharge pay higher overall rates because of the relative additional burden placed on the treatment plant. This also means that industrial customers that pretreat waste can receive lower overall costs. However, in the case of Sanger, because one industrial customer is a very large proportion of overall wastewater influent,

Page 25 ends

379
if significant pretreatment occurs, the rate balance between Volume, BOD, and TSS will need to be reset to continue to cover the cost of service for operation of the industrial plant. The present proportions are 45 percent volume, 25 percent BOD, and 30 percent TSS. These have been adjusted to be 30 percent volume, 40 percent BOD, and 30 percent TSS, consistent with the averages of utilities used in the comparison analysis. See the comparison below for volume, BOD, and TSS.
lndustrial Wastewater Cost Component Weighting
I TSS
r BOD
I Volume
Sanger
Present
Sanger Reedley Visalia Tulare Parlier Hanford S-K-F
Proposed
XVI I l. Wastewater Com parisons
Sanger's residential wastewater rates are slightly higher than most other utilities in the comparison below; however, industrial rates have been substantially lower, as discussed in this study. Accordingly, the conclusions of the rate study are strongly supported by comparison analysis.
1t.l t., ').".i,,
.tt::';11
::'.a:

Page 26 ends

380
$60.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$0.00
$700,000
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$0
$80,000
Residential Sewer Rate Comparison ($/Mo;
lSewer EtStorm
aslil'
c)o
do
0,
5 @o
3 orI
T
t-o3oo
d
-n
d(n
f
o
oog
f(o
0)
Iq,
f
o'
a
-n
@
o)
f,(o
oa
-tt
o)
=6'a
7ooo.
o
-tcd
a
I
Large lndustrial Wastewater Treatment Monthly Comparison (For Concentrated lnfluent: 1,710 BOD and 852 TSS)
rTSS
r BOD
rVolume
$196,040
illl
Sanger
Present
Sanger Fresno Hanford Visalia Tulare Parlier S-K-F Reedley cos

Page 27 ends

381
XlX. Wastewater Conclusion
The work of this wastewater study has thoroughly analyzed the financial statements, rates, and revenue of Sanger's wastewater enterprise. The body of this study combined with the various attachments provide the supporting data and calculations confirming the results of the study. The recommended modified rate structure provides an improvement from the previous rate structure, specifically, more accurately allocating costs to provide service across reasonably defined rate classes.

Page 28 ends

382

ATTACHMENTS

Page 29 ends

383
2019
Audited
$2,965,248
106,049
5,193
166,832
$650,638
85,896
100,284
136,690
368,286
409,610
156,664
646,200
103,000
$2,657,268
$586,054
$221,552
2,55
$364,s02
$7,220,925
$7,220,925
lnflation
4%
5o/"
209,000
715,000
1,034.000
327,000
88,000
251,000
't 03,000
217,000
751,000
1,065,000
340,000
92,000
264,000
103,000
235,000
828,000
1 ,130,000
368,000
102,000
29'1,000
103,000
226,000
789,000
1,097,000
354,000
97,000
277,000
103,000
$4,192,000
$353,000
$239,912

1.47 $1 13,088
-$200,000
Gity of Sanger Water Enterprise Fund {6,l ll
Revenues, Expenditures, and Rtnd Balance
Fscal Year Ending June 30, 1 2 3
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
AudiEd Audited Unaudited Budget Projected ProjecEd prcjected Potenlial lncreases: 2glo 10% 4%
$3,115,049 $3,199,666 $3,033,038 $3,088,000 $3,706,000 $4,077,000 $4,240.000 77,639 3,010 19,550 2,200 30,000 3o,o0o 3o,oo0
2,913 16,770 225,011 5,300 5,000 5,000 5,000
159,095 34,351 1 36,100 10o,0oo 10o,ooo 100,ooo
45 2027 2028
Projected Projected
4% 4%
$4,4'r0,000 $4,586.000
30,000 30,000
5,000 5,000
1 00,000 1 00,000
$1,009,000
100,000
140,000
$1,059,000
104,000
146,000
Qoss Revenues
Revenue from Rates
Penalties & lnstallations
Oher (Ercluding lmpact Fees)
lnterest lnmme
Tobl eo6s Rev€nues
Operating Expensesi
Salaries and Benefits23'a
Other Supplies and Senices
Supplies and Chemicals (6122, 6129\
DBCP Carbon Replacement
Professional Seniices
Utilities: Eleclric & cas
SGII/A lncludi ng Adm inislration
Fees & Filings
Other General & Admin
lnternal Admin & lndirect Cost Plan
Tans in Lieu
Operating E:(penses
A\raihble ior Debt Service
Debt Service
Bonds Debt Service Correrage Ratio
Revenue after Debt Service
Capital beenditures
Adjust
Total Cash
Restricted for BDCP Carbon Replacement
Unrestricted Cash
Must Equal
$633,040 $545,177 $544,093
73,967 97 ,521 107,324
88,257 87,176 127,138
114,694 209,346
165,719 183,349 237,141
460,977 479,838 531,103
54't,527
44,494 290,963 49,335
60,305 72,814 75,000
372,500 333,099 227,600
103,000 103,000 103,000
$2,1 16,953
$1,237,743
$225,653

5.49 $1,012,090
-$1,651,307
$687,581
$2,402,293
$851,514
$224,478
3,79
$627,036
-$769,341
-$545,008
$2,543,261
$734,339
$223,152
3,29
$51 1 ,187
-$581,500
$3,243,322 $3,354,696 $3,253,797 $3,277,600 $3,131,600 $3,841,000 94,212,O00 $4,375,000 94,545,000 $4,721,000 $648,800
85,000
120,000
193,700
649,000
582,400
301,700
80,000
227,600
1 03,000
$2,991,200
$140,400
$216,258

0.65 -$7s,858
-$842,s00
$871,000
88,000
125,000
201,000
68'1,000
805,000
314,000
84,000
239,000
103,000
$3,511,000
$330,000
$240,664

1.37 $89,336
-$200,000
$915,000
92,000
130,000
$961,000
96,000
135,000
5o/o
4o/o
4%
4Yo
5o/o
5o/o
$3,864,000
$348,000
$237,822

1.46 $1 10,178
-$200,000
$4,024,000
$351,000
$238,948

1.47 $112,O52
-$200,000
$4,366,000
$355,000
$241 ,717
147
$'l'13,283
-$200,000
$7,220,925 $7,269,289 $6,581,976
(Operati ng Expenses ab ove)
$6,511,663 $s,593,305 $5,482,641 $s,392,819 $5,304,871 $s,217,9s9 $5,131,242 -$3,600,000 -$3,445,000 -$3,284,000 -$3,117,000 -$2,943,000 -$2,762,000 -$2,574,000 $7,269,289 $6,s81,976 $2,911,663 $2,148,305 $2,198,641 $2,275,819 $2,361,871 $2,4s5,959 $2,557,242 $7,269,289 $6,581,976
Major Facilities Fee Revenue $70,402 $74,047 91,029,893 $53,721 $53,100 lrlotes
) Ercludes depreciation and amortizafon
P
€0)
oa
no
o)C
-o
mxEof(n
oI
s)
=o-
Tlcl
o_
TDq)
0)
fo
o
tl
0,(o
o
o)o
384
B. Water Cost-of-Seruice lnputs
Wate r Cost-of-Service lnputs
Allocations by Function to Gustomer Groups
Total SF Apt Al Schools Com/Other lndustrial
Volume
Treated Sales (TGl/r)
Volume %
1,827,377
lOOo/o
1,064,991
58o/o
127,033
7o/o
119,659
7o/o
1 09,190
60/o
406,504
22o/o
Capacity Peaking
Avg Mo (TG)
Peak Mo (TG) Arg 2021
Peaking Factor
Peaking - Average (TG)
Peak CapacityAlocation %
Capacity Peaking Gosts
Percent Peaking
Total COS fom Rates
Gapacity Cost Results
152,281
216,553

1.4 64,272
100To
88,749
132,898

1.5 44,149
690/o
10,586
13,799

1.3 3,213
5o/o
9,972
18,993

1.9 9,021
14o/o
9,099
11,829

1.3 2,730
4o/o
33,875
39,034

1.2 5,159
8%
1 1o/o
$3.706.000
$407,660
Percent of monthly volumes (summer) greater than monthly system average $407,660 $280,025 $20,379 $57 ,22',1 $17,315 $32,720
Sustainable Cnound Water Management (SGMA)
Volume % (fom above)
Four-Year Avg Cost $1,000,000
Allocated based on Volume
100o/o
$1,000,000
58o/o
$582,798
7o/o
$69,517
7o/o
$65,481
60/o
$59,752
22o/o
$222,452
Customer Services and Billing Costs
Customer Count
Customer %
Multiplier
ghted Count
ons %
Cust Svcs & Billing Cost
Svcs and Billing Results
Total SF Apt All Schools Com/Other lndustrial
6,984 6,300 227
90o/o 3Yo
13 8,550 6,300 681
100% 74o/o $Yo
$239,000 From lnternal Admin and lndirect Cost
$239,000 $176,105 $19,036 $4,445 $33,125 $6,289
53 1o/o
3 159
2o/o
395
6o/o
3 1 ,185
14o/o
I
0To
25 225
3o/o
Gosts
Total SF ADt All Schools Com/Other lndustrial
Total COS from Rates
Less Capacity
Less SGMA
Less CustSra & Billing
Balance to Volume
Volume % (from above)
$3,706,000
($407,660)
($1,000,000)
($239.000)
$2,059,340
100o/o
$2,059,340
58%
$1,200,178
7o/o
$143,1s8
7o/o
$134,848
60/o
$123,050
22To
$458,1 05Results

Page 31 ends

385
C. Water Revenue Requirement Allocation Table
Cityof SangerWaterEnterprise Rewnue RequirementAllocation Table(FY23124) Schools
$134,848 '
Com/Other lndustrial
Rewnue Requirement
ume Related
Excess(Defi cency) of Funds
Quantity Delivered (TG)
byClass ($/TG)
Multi-Family
$65,481
$57,221
$4,445
($25,e16)
11o/o
1 19,659
$2.19
$67,843
-23o/o
109,190
$2.14
$123,050
$59,752
$17,315
$33,125
$233,242
$301,085
$233,242
$0
($455,186)
172o/o
406,504
$1.77
$458,105
$222,452
$32,720
$6,289
$719,567
$264,381
$719,567
$0
Ground Water Recharge (SGII4A)
Peaking
Cust Svcs & Billing
Adjusted Rerenue Requirement
Rer,enue at Present Rates i,
Total Single-Fam ily
$3,706,000 $2,239,107
$3,088,000 $2,036,256
$3,706,000 $2,239,107
$0 $0
($1,8e1)
1o/o
127,033
$1.98
$143,158
$69,517
$20,379
$19,036
$252,090
$250,199
$252,090
$0
$261,995
,
$o
$261,995
$236,079
($618,000)
20o/o
1,827,377
$2.03
($202,851)
1lYo
1,064,991
$2.10
$2,059,340
$1,000,000
$407,660
$239,000
$1,200,178
$582,798
$280,025
$176,105
$1.69
$2.03
$1.91
$1.69
$1.97
$1.69
$1.97
$1.69
$2.76
$1.69
$0.65
$1.69
Present Total by Class ($/TG)
Pres e nt Arre ra ge FY22 123
Volume Related
Ground Water Recharge (SGtt/A)
Peaking
Cust Svcs & Billing
TotalbyClass ($/TG)
Proposed Arerage
$1.13
$0.55
$0.26
$0.17
$0.00
$2.10
$2.03
$1.13
$0.s5
$0.16
$0.15
$0.00
$1.98
$2.03
$1.13
$0.55
$0.16
$0.30
$0.00
$2.14
$2.03
$1 .13
$0.55
$0.08
$0.02
$0.00
$1.77 .
$2.03
$0.55,
:
$0.48
$0.04
$0.00
$2.19,
$2.03,
Existing Rate Rewnue Allocation Values
Total Single-Family
$1 ,804,678 $1 ,348,379 $131 ,697
$1 ,283,322, $687,877 $1 18
Multi-Family Schools Com/Other lndustrial
Base Revenue
Quantity Re\enue
Total Rerenue
Base Rewnue o/o
Volume Rerenue %
$99,237,
$136,843
$199,430
$101,655
$25,936
$238,445
$3,088,000 $2,036,256
58Yo 66%
42o/o 34o/o
$250,199
53o/o
47o/o
$236,079
42o/o
58o/o
$301,085
660/o
34o/o
$264,381
1Oo/o
90%

Page 32 ends

386
I
=
qt
o-n
o)
o
ao
='(cl
ao
3 'Tt
x'oo-
o
J
)
o,
Jo-
oc
3o
=.C)
7 0)
o
at,
1l!)(cI
o(,(t
$618,000 200a

29.O%

0.0%
20-ooh
€5.0%

0.0%

0.0%
o.o./.
o.1%$3,706,000 -$4,179$3,70't,821. $1,897,'t43$1,804,57E 1,E27 o.oo/.$0.59lndusfial
49% $2.03.. 1,213i2? !,08_8,000._.. . $1,804,678
Presenl Fired and Volume ReEnue
46/.
3Aoh
85%
69t 717 '1860.3%
767
1419,567
$687,677_
-36,843l
127,O33i
1 19,659 i
,697

9.ao/o
Perenl
lncEase
Combined
,44A263
ToLal
2,235
Combined
,361
't8,502
64,21
887
ReEnue
Resultant
\6lumEfic
$0_E33
!0.e93
\blumebic
Rste
lncEasediJonlhlyFiredlnreased
$250,
CurentToblwl
8,502
Curenl
Rab
$0.646
CurenlAW.
... 90j93
crc)
Billed
,064,991
Wlumesilhnthly
$99
$:r,148
FiEd
172%17't.40/.
91 $1.70
Delermin€lio:r of FiE: lbrfllJild Volumetric RaEs Consisbntwith Coslotseryie t odel lncrcases
i/tilti-FamiV
Schools
Com/Olher
1 10/o
-23./o
...0,01,-

11.6o/0.
-2'l.90/r
To iibtch COS iilodel
sz,zsg,toz -ss,ssz o2,/. s202,a52-!
$252,090 -$1,E91 O.Aoh: . $1,891
$26'r,99s 91,453 -O.5%i $25,915
Prcposed
OErall
4EE9e

92.10 $1.97

12.20 sats coalrfherfo ttre i^t:n-Fanilywl:ne Ete as a Easonabla @mprcmi*, shif,ing comtolher@st-ot-fiNi@ Evenue to lndusbiat. &0.83
$0.93

91.37 $0.93
s1.54
Polenlial Adjustnents to Cost of Serui@ Rates
1,427,3771
Single-Family
$'163,933
Rale
20%
-6361
-$369
O.Oo/o:

Billed curentAE.u"'"1:,'
RarE

1.,064,991i. S0.646
. . ...!1.,896111 $'r,896,774 $1,897,143.
$1.04
Volume
ReEnue Doliation
ftom aboE
887,361 -$223
, 163,933
101,547 . 9101,547 35,579 965,967
1642'11 -$279
o%
163%
14't $1 1E,141 I 1
Volume
Subtotal
$887.138
Resultant
Volum etric
Rewnue
,887,13E.
387
E. Water Rate Table Proposed
City of Sanger Water Rates and Charges
Current Rates
Propo6ed Rates
7t1t2024 : 7t'120257t'12023 7l'112026 7 t1t2027
Rates ($/TG) Etfecti!e
7 t't t2010
Percenl
Change New Rate 1Oo/o 4o/o 4o/o 4o/o
Slngle-Family
Upto6TG
6to30TG
30 to 100 TG
1 00 to 500 TG
Above 500 TG
$0.43
$0.71
$1.10
$1.16
$1.29
$0.93
$1.14
$0.93
$0.59
290/o
29o/o
29o/o
$0.5s
$0.92
$1.42
$1.42
$1.42
$0.93
$1.37
$0.93
$1.54
$0.61
$1.01
$1.s6
$1.56
$1.56
$ 1.02
$1.s1
$1.02
$1.69
$0.63
$1.0s
$1,62
$1.62
$1.62
$1.06
$1.s7
$1.06
$1.76
$0.66
$1.09
$1.68
$1.68
$1.68
$1.10
$1.63
$1.10
$1.83
$0.69
$1.13
$1.75
$1.75
$1.7s
$1.14
$1.70
$1.14
$1.90
Multi-Family (All Volumes) 0%
20%
Oo/o
'161o/o
(AllVolumes)
(AllVolumes)
Processing (All Volumes)
Monthly Charges ($/Mo)
Single-Family
Qualifying Low lncome
5/8 x 3/4" meter
1" meter
All Other Customers
5E x3/4" meter
1" meter
'1.5" meler
2" meter
3" l\reter
4" lvleter
6" lvleler
S" lvleter
$10.19
$12.46
$24.27
0%
Oo/o
Oo/o
0o/o
Oo/o
Oo/o
Oo/o
0%
Oo/o
o%
0o/o
'lQo/o
$10.19
$12.46
$24.27
$11.21
$13.71
$26.70
$11.66
$14.26
$27.77
$12.13
$14.83
$28.88
$12.62
$15.42
$30.04
$12.46
$24.27
$62.32
$99.69
s186.92
$31 1.53
$623.06
$1,090.34
$ 12.46
$24.27
$62.32
$99.69
$186.92
$311.s3
9623.06
$1,090.34
$13.71
$26.70
$68.55
s109.66
$205.61
$342.68
$685.37
$1,199.37
$14.26
$27.77
$71.29
$ 1 14.05
$213.83
$356.39
$712.78
$1,247.34
$14.83
$28.88
$74.14
$1 18.61
$222.38
$370.65
$741.29
$1 ,297.23
$15.42
$30.04
$77 .11
$123.35
$231.28
$385.48
$770.94
$1,349.12
Existing Customers Without Meters $34.63 $38.09 $41.90 $43.58 $45.32 $47.1 3 Customers outside the city limits were previouslycharged a premium for seMce. This additional charge is removed in lhe proposed rates. s ingle-fam ilytiered rates are presently applicable lo all custom ers, except lhal above 500 TG for induslrial is $0.51 per TG. \ ihere 'All Volum es" is indicated for Current Rates, the \ralues s hown are the average of the existing tiered rates charged for each custom er group. Tiered rates are inated, except for s ing le-fam ily.
m im im um m eter s ize presently installed is 1 inch. The sm aller 5/8" x 3/4" m eters are no longer installed Low lncome cuslomers receive the lirst 6 TG tee of charge, then pay beginning with lhe 6 - 30 TG rate

Page 34 ends

388
f|
€0)
@
o€o)
oa
no
ofc
-o
mxEo5(t,
o
:n
o,fo-
l'lcf
CL
TD
0t
d
=oo
T]
0)(o
o
(J)
(,l
City of Sanger Sewer Enterprbe tund (621)
ReEnues, Expendifures, and fund Balance
2019
Ardited
Fscal Year Ending June 30,
2020 2021 2022
Ardited Atdited Unaudited
$5,477,352 $5,269,174 $5,246,000
70,0'14 13,884 3s,727
2023
ProjecEd
,ncreases.'
$5,246,000
50,000
90,000
1 2024
Pmjecbd
4%
$5,456,OOO
50,ooo
180,000
$1,199,000
237,000
990,000
162,000
88,000
64,000
43,OO0
39,OO0
114,000
208,O00
338,O00
103,000
$3,585,000
$2,101,OO0
$1,514,707

1.39 s586,294
-$500,oo0
2 2025
Prcjectect
4o,/.
$5,674,O00
50,ooo
180,000
$1,259,000
246,000
1,040,000
168,000
92,000
67,000
45,000
41,OOO
119,000
216,OO0
355,OOO
103,000
$3,751,000
$2,153,O00
s1,461,342

1.47 $697,658
-$1,900,ooo
3 2026
PrcjecEd
40h
$5,901,OO0
50,000
$1,322,000
256,000
1,092,000
175,000
96,000
70,000
47,000
43,000
124,000
225,O00
373,OOO
103,OO0
s3,926,000
$2,205,000
$1,501,510

1.47 $703,490
-$500,000
4 2027
PrcjecEd
4o/a
s6,137,000
50,000
180,OO0
$1,388,000
266,000
1,147,000
182,000
100,000
73,000
49,000
45,000
129,000
234,000
392,000
103,OO0
$4,10E,000
$2,259,OOO
$1,505,905

1.50 $753,095
-$500,000
5 2024
Pmjected
4%
$6,382,O00
50,o00
180,000
s1,457,000
277,000
1,204,000
189,000
104,000
76,000
51,000
47,000
134,OO0
243,O00
412,OO0
103,O00
$4,297.000
$2,315,OOO
$1,506,575

1.54 $808,426
-$500,oo0
@cs Rewnuest
Rewnue tom Rates
Penalties and Misc
lnterest Earnings
Rewnues
and Maintenance Costs2
Salaries and benefits3'4s
Professional Services
Utilities: Elechic & Gas
Fees & Filings
Plant Chem icals
Supplies - Shop and Field
Vehicle Maint, Fuel, lnsurance
Permit Sampling
Repair & lrlaint: Equipment
Other Supplies, Serui@s, & General
lnternalAdmin & lndirect Cost Plan
Ta€s in Lieu
Operating E(peces
AEilable for ltebt Service
Debt Service
Service Corerage Ratio
Rewnue after Debt Service
Capital ElpenditJres6
Adjust
Cash and lnEstments
140,859 36,041 2 180,000
$5,323,303 $5,688,225 $5,319,099 $5,281,729 $5,386,000 $5,686,000 $5,^O4,OOO S6,191,OOO $sj20,347
86,87S
116,078
s905,677
22't,526
745,O52
61,573
93,959
63,732
33,563
24,260
50,489
132,583
659,200
103,000
$3,094,614
$2,228,689
$1,481,123
,1.50
$747,s66
-$187,876
$552.1 50
$93E,474 $937,726
231 ,828 318,852
559,450 635,967
71,606 160,571
107,'169 81,325
61 , 107 65,245
34,218 50,532
33,109 46,946
55,896 86,036
104,524 47,'137
473,400 419,324
1 03,000 1 03,000
8851,229
177,578
775,753
144,411
42,018
77,873
31,494
27,444
207,780
208,984
321,900
't 03,000
$2,969,468
$2,312,261
91,537 ,372

1.50 $774,889
-$336,242
s6,367,000 $6,612,000
lnflation
$2,783,7A1
92,904,444
$1,540,923
'1.88
$1,363,521
$0
$1 2,090
$2,952,661
$2,366,438
sl,536,762

1.54 $829,676
-$239,840
$25,367
$1 ,042,000
228,OOO
943,000
156,000
84,200
61,800
41 ,1 00
37,400
109,600
200,000
321,900
1 03,000
$3,328,000
$2,058,000
s1,553,1 18

1.33 $s04,882
-$205,300
5%
4%
5%
4%
404
4o/o
40/.
4o/o
4%
4o/o
5%
$6,588,539 $7,964,150 $8,s79,353 $9,018,000 S9,317,582 $9,403,876 $S,195,533 SA,ggg,O23 $8,652,118 58,s60,543 $230,077 $251,470 $84,793
(1) Ercludes impactfee rerenue
(2) baludes depreciation and amortizalion
coErage calculations
coErage calculations
For Fn1, Salaries and Benefits, the audited wlue of $1 ,370,687 includes $432,961 of PERS Epense GASB68 that was a non{ash hansaction, sim ilar to depreciation; therefore it is ercluded from the debt mErage calculations.
domestic sludqe thickener and Anaerobic Diqester.
389
F)
€qt
a
o€q,
o
oo
U'
fot
U)o

3.oo
o-o
0)4o
=go
3o
an
6'
I
fo-
c
@
a
A'
llo,(o
o
o)
ct)
Allocation of Cost Categories to Functionalization
ii
Gost Categories Fn3n4 r AchievedTarget Allocation Comments Salaries and Benefih $1 199,000 $649 50 $0 $349 65/35 \blume after collection f-r9,$s g i91a ! Qgrvlcgg . $237 ,000 $237 ,000 $141 ,0s0 $20,000 65/35 \rblume.. 40/60 Pond Aeration
65/3s \blume
\blume65l35
65/35
80no
\blume
80% Domestic
Permit Sampling - : ,$39,ooo
, , $l 14,000
-$99,909 I - $29rgso $o $13,650
$32,900-
. $60,480
$12,000
$36,050
$531,086
$0
65/35
65/35
65/35
$1000/lvb lnd
65/35
6!/35
1 00/0
7AD2
\6lume
\rbl,ume
\blume
lnt Adm & lndirect S\cs
100% Domestic
\6lume
Repair & Ivbint Equipment $1 14,000 $61 ,r 00 $2,0,,000 $0 ot!91 Supplies, Serviges,.q-991eFl
Billing Cust Srcs
Ta€s in Lieu
$208,000 $208,000,
$338,000 $93-8roo0 - l $0
$1 03,000 I
_ $10_3p0q i . $66,9s0
Bond Debt Service $1,514,707 $983r6?9
C9n{ibution t9 Capihl Repair
Subtract oher revenue
Total for Rate Setting
9q96,2e4: $586,294 go"r, a"rn to
-$180,000 Lab Fees io Domestic
I
i
$51156 ,000: . $5,456p00 $1,757,506
$1,757,506i $5,456,000
Operating Elgenses
Bond Debt Service 707
Elcess Cash after debt s\ic
Oher Revenue i -$zao,oooi
for Rate : $5,456,000
lndustrial
Treatment
Domestic
Domestic
Treatment
Collection Billing/Cust
System Srrcs
390
-
€o)a
o€o)
o-vo
ofco
nooc.
d3of
oc,q)
=of
-lo)
oo
1l!)(o
o
o){
Cityof Sanger Sewer Enterprise Re\ienue RequirementAllocation Table (Fp3/24) Total Single-Family Multi-Family Schools Com/Other lndustrial lnfl uent Dom estic (TG/yr)
lnfluent Domestic 7o
576,000
IOOY.
404,460
7Oo/o
94,500
16%
21,000
4o/o
56,040
10o/o
lnfl uent lncluding lndustrial (TG/yr)
lnfluent Combined %
887,000
100o/o
404,460
460/o
94,500
1 1o/o
21,000
2%
56,040
6%
311,000
35o/o
Dom. Op. and lvhint.

Dom. Debrred lvhintenance
Bond Debt Service
lnd. Op. and I\Iaint.
$2,128,580
$586,294
$1,5'14,707
$1,226,420
$1,494,662
$411,688
$690,686
$349,220
$96,189
$ 1 61 ,375
$77,604
$21 ,375
$35,861
$207,093
$57,041
$s5,698 $531,086
$1,226,420
Re\ienue Requirement
Revenue at Present Rates
$5,456,000
$5,246,000
$2,597,036
$2,940,000
$606,784
$680,000
$134,841
$150,000
$359,833
$410,000
$1,757,506
$1,066,000
bces s(Defi ciency) of Funds ($210,000)

4.00o/o
$342,964
-12o/o
$73,216
-11%
$15,159
-10To
$50,167
-'l2o/o
($6e1,506)
65%
Deft rred lt/laintenance and Capital
Replacement Funding
Total Rerienue Requirement
$1,351,464 $342,964 $73,216 $15,159 $50,167 $869,957
$6,807,464 $2,940,000 $680,000
$0
0o/o
$150,000
$0
o%
$410,000 $2,627,464
($1,561,464)
1460/o
Exces s(Defi ciency) of Funds $o $0
Oo/"Oo/o
Present Totals $/TG Influent $5.91 $7.27 $7.20 $7.14 $7.32 $3.43 Proposed $/TG Influent
Operations and llaintelance
Deferred lvbintenance and Capital
Replacement.Fund ing
Existing Debt Service
$3.70
$1.02
$2.63
$3.70
$1.87
$1.71
$3.70
$1.79
$'t.71
$3.70
$1.74
$1.71
$3.70
$1.91
$1.7'l
$3.94
$2.80
$1.71
$7.34 $7.27 $7.20 $7.14 $7.32 $8.45
391
q,
a,
o€o)
oI
@o€o*7
1l
ottoQ
oo-
7 A)
o
-lo)
oo
ll
0)(o
o
G)
@
City of Sanger Present and Proposed Sevuer Rates
Ptoposed 711127
Change hr ltbnth
4o/o $37.32
4o/o $41.45
Mnirlum
[/bntht
$41.4s
$41.4s
$41.4s
$/TG
4o/o
4o/o
4o/o
$3.78
$4.33
$4.89
$1.00
$1.4s
Er Sludent per lbnth
o%
Oo/o
i"n
4o/o
4%
$2.s02
$223.4A
$335.97
l{oles:

1. hdustrhl ratesareselbasedonpotablewaternr-tered,whichbl4percenthoherthanfiEteredinfluentintothewastewaterpbinlbasedonF(21t22. ellectve 711123, and as escalated in the follow ing phnning years.

Proposed 7/1/26
Change Fer l,bnth
$35.88
$39.86
o%
ooa
Mniryum
ilbnthV
Oo/o $39.86
oo/o $39.86
oo/o $39.86
$/TG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
hr Student per ltbnlh
*
Oo/o
$1.00
$1.45
4%
4%
4o/t
$2.406
$214.88
$323.04
Proposed 7/1/25
Change rer l\bnth
Oo/o $35.88
Oo/o $39.86
Mnirnlm
i/bnthV
o% $39.86
o% $39.86
OYo $39.86
$/TG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Fer Student per ltbnth
o%
Oo/o
$1.00
$1.4s
$2.313
$206.62
$310.62
4%
4%
4o/o
Proposed 711124
Change Per l\bnlh
$3s.88
$39.86
o%
O6/d
Oo/o
Oo/o
Oo/o
$/IG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Mnirum
i/bnthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
oir"
Oo/o
Fer Student per Month
$'1.00
$1 .45
$2.224
$198.67
$298.67
i"n
4o/o
4o/n
Proposed 7/1/23
Change Per l\bnth
OYo $35.88
Oo/o $39.86
Mnifium
libnlhV
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
o%
o%
Oo/o
$/IG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Er Student per i/bnth
- Ended
- Ended
- $1.00
Oo/o $1.215
72%
298o/o
1480k
Ended
$2.14
$191.03
$287.19
Present
Er t\,bnth
$35.88
$39.86
Mnirum
Ir/bnthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
VTG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Fer Student per lbnth
$0.84
$1.08
NewRate
$1.4s
Vadable
$1.241
$48.00
$1 16.00
Category of Service
AII Single-Fam ily Res idences and
Multi-Family per unit
0 - 6,000 galons per ryDnth
Above 6,000
Commercial
NlornEl: 0 - 250.r9/lBOD
It/bdium 251 - 500 ng/l BOD
High: Above 500 ryg/l BOD
Schools
K-12 without Cafeteria
K-12 w ith Cafeteria
EefiEnlary Schoob
Mddle and Flioh Schools
lndustrial Ratesl'2
Fixed [bnthv Fee
Fbw, per TG nrlered potable
BOD, per thousand lbs
Suspended Solids, per thousand lbs
392
J. Wastewater lndustrial Plant lmprovements
The following attachment is "Technical Memorandum No. 2," dated February 2,2023, is prepared by Alfonso Manrique, PE, of AM Consulting Engineers lnc. The memorandum describes improvements necessary to Sanger's lndustrialWastewater Plant, including probable costs.

Page 39 ends

393
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 2
TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

DATE: 21212023

JOHN MULLIGAN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

ALFONSO MANRIQUE, PE
CITY OF SANGER \AM/TP - INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
EVALUATION OF I\MA/TF
I. PURPOSE OF THIS TM
The purpose of this TM #2 is to conduct an evaluation of the existing lndustrial Wastewater Treatment Facility (l\M /TF) and identifiT improvements that are necessary to continue handling current wastewater flows. l\MA/TFs included in this TM #2 include conveyance and treatment facilities.

II. BACKGROUND
The City of Sanger (City) provides sewer service to residents and businesses within its service area. A separate industrial sewer serves three major industrial dischargers in the City. The three major industrial dischargers include: Gibson Wnery, Pitman Farms and lnitiative Foods. lnitiative foods stopped discharging in July 2016 due to a major fire at their production facility and is currently out of business.

Gibson \A/inery produces table and dessert wines and its discharge exhibits a seasonal nature with peak flows occurring from August to October. Pitman Farms processes poultry and its discharge also exhibits seasonal peaks. As indicated in TM #1, both Gibson Wnery and Pitman Farms have progressively increased the volume of their discharges to the City's l\ M/TF in the last few years.

III. IWWTF DESCRIPTION
The IW\A/TF consists of a screen, a grit tank, a primary clarifier, a roughing filter, a secondary clarifier, a mechanically aerated lagoon, a mechanically aerated storage lagoon, and three non- aerated storage lagoons. Treated effluent is discharged to 188 acres of farmland adjacent to the I\AM/TF.

III.1. INDUSTRIAL SEWER TRUNK MAIN
lndustrial wastewater flows are conveyed by a gravity sewer main that begins as a 15" pipe at Pitman Farms and follows the Southern Pacific Railroad south until the intersection with North Avenue; then it increased in size to a 24" and turns east along North Avenue and goes east to approximately 500 ft east of Newmark Avenue and then turns south to the \AM/TP. The size of the industrial sewer main is 16"RCP pipe as it enters the I\AM/TF. The slope of the industrial sewer main is before Newmark Ave is approximately 0.0025. Beyond Newmark Avenue the slope of the industrial sewer main is unknown.

The industrial sewer main experienced an overflow coinciding with the 2016 peak monthly flows.

Assuming a minimum slope of 0.001, the hydraulic capacity of the industrial sewer main appears to be adequate to convey the peak daily flows. lt is recommended that the industrial sewer main be cleaned annually preferably ahead of the peak discharge months (August through October) to maintain adequate hydraulic capacity.
394
lf the industrial sewer main overflows again, the City should conduct a CCTV survey of the entire alignment to determine if the overflows are caused by a reduced hydraulic capacity (blockage) or by excessive discharge flows.

III.2. HEADWORKS
The existing l\M /TF headworks begin with a comminutor in parallel with manually cleaned bar screen with a 1 /o" opening. The comminutor is currently out of service and the manually cleaned bar screen is the only solids removal process at the |\MA/TF. The manually cleaned bar screen primarily captures large grease balls and needs to be cleaned several times a day. A mechanical bar screen is recommended to handle the increased discharge volume. A smaller opening (114" or 3/8") mechanically cleaned bar screen would reduce the loading into the l\ M/TF and improve the performance of downstream processes.

Following the screens, industrial wastewater flows into two aerated grit tanks in parallel. Grit is continuously removed from the bottom of the grit tanks using airlift pumps. Some of the grit tank piping and grit conveyance equipment is severely deteriorated and it should be replaced. ln addition, the concrete coating on the grit tanks is delaminating. The concrete tanks need to be taken out of service and recoated.

The pH of the raw industrial wastewater should be adjusted to be above 6. Adjustment of pH may take place at the I\AM/TF headworks or at the industrial discharger's facilities. The second option would be preferred to minimize corrosion of the industrial sewer main.

III.3. PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION
Wastewater flows from the headworks structure, through a Parshall Flume into Junction Box No.1 (JB #1). JB #'t allows to direct the flow into Primary Sedimentation Tank No. 2 (PST #2) or bypass PST #2 and convey wastewater into JB #7. Both junction boxes are showing signs of concrete deterioration and need to be recoated.

PST #2 is a circular concrete structure 45 ft in diameter and 8 ft deep. Table 1 lists the typical primary sedimentation recommended operating ranges in terms of hydraulic loading, detention time and weir loading and the current operating parameters in PST #2 based on the 2022 maximum month average and maximum day data.

Table I - PST #2 Operating Parameters
Parameter Recommended
Current
Average Peak Day
Hydraulic Loading, gpd/sqft 800-1,200 553 924
Detention Time, h 1.5-2.5 2.59 1.55
Weir Loading, gpd/ft 10,00040,000 6,225 10,398
PST #2 appears to be working within the recommended operating parameters during the peak day flow and under its capacity during average flow conditions.

The age of the primary sedimentation tank is unknown. The 1971 construction documents indicate that the primary sedimentation tanks were already existing. Therefore, the structure is likely more than 50 years old. The concrete and steel structure above the water is showing signs of deterioration and should be rehabilitated. The longer detention times observed during average flow 2 395
conditions are likely creating septic conditions in the tank and are the source of odors and hydrogen sulfide corrosion.

It is recommended that PST #2 be drained, recoated and the clarifier mechanism replaced. A redundant primary clarifier is recommended if industrial peak monthly flows are expected to increase.

Primary sludge is pumped by two pumps located at the primary sludge pump station. The primary sludge pump station shared with the domestic plant and the cost of improvements should be shared between domestic and industrial users. lmprovements to the primary sludge pump station include replacing the primary sludge pumps and replacing the corroded access doors.

III.4. ROUGHING FILTER
Wastewater effluent from the primary sedimentation basin flows into JB #7. At JB #7, wastewater can be directed to flow into Wet Well Sump No. 3 of the lntermediate Pump Station (lPS) or the industrial effluent pump station. The IPS pumps wastewater into a roughing filter.

A roughing filter is a high rate trickling filter that is designed to adsorb peak biological loads that might upset future wastewater processes. Roughing filters are biological processes that are typically used as a pre-treatment step in combination with other downstream treatment processes.

Roughing filters typically remove between 40 and 85 percent of the incoming BOD. Downstream processes operate at more conventional loading rates. Table 2 lists the design characteristics of the existing roughing filter:

Table 2 - Roughing Filter Design Parameters
Parameter Value
Diameter 55ft
Depth 21.5ft
Media Plastic Cross Flow
Ventilation Natural Draft
Maximum Recirculation
Recirculation Pumps 2
Recirculation Pumps Capacity 6.2 MGD
Table 3 lists the recommended operating range in terms of hydraulic loading and organic loading for roughing filters and the current operating loads based on the maximum month data.

Table 3 - Roughing Filter Operating Parameters
Parameter Recommended Current
Average Peak llllonth
Hydraulic Loading, gpd/sqft 1,4004,200 370 618
Organic Loading, lbs BODs/ 103 cuft >100 243 528
Under average conditions, the roughing filter operates below the recommended hydraulic loading and is within the recommended organic loading. However, the average organic loading doubles during the peak month and the filte/s ability to quickly respond to those loads is limited. 3 396
The City monitored the performance of the roughing filter from 2009 through 2011. Figure 1 shows the percentage of BOD removal observed across the roughing filter for each month. The historical removal percentages significantly drop during the months of September and October. The low pH of the incoming wastewater during those months, and the lack of adequate air flow are likely killing the attached biomass inside the roughing filter and negatively affecting its performance. ln the short-term it is recommended that pH control be incorporated at each of the discharger's facilities to increase the pH of their discharge to at least 6 which will prevent the interference with biological treatment processes at the |\AM/TF. lt is also recommended to install a forced aeration system in the roughing filter to ensure adequate orygen supply year-round.

The roughing filter was out of service from 2015 to 2017 as a consequence of a failure in the rotary arm distributor. The rotary arm distributor was replaced in 2017and was placed back in operation.

The exterior fiberglass panels are showing signs of ageing and wear. Fiberglass fibers are delaminating and fasteners are missing. The exterior of the roughing filter needs to be rehabilitated by reinstalling fasteners and applying an exterior polyurethane coat.

The primary effluent pump station that pumps primary effluent into the roughing filter is also deteriorated. The wet well is deteriorated and the building that houses the pumps needs new HVAC and new doors.

III.5. SLUDGE THICKENER
Domestic and industrial primary sludge are pumped into a gravity sludge thickener. The gravity sludge thickener receives excessive amounts of grease (likely from the industrial wastewater) which creates a challenge for operators. The thickener mechanism needs to be retrofitted to include grease removal. Also, the effluent from the sludge thickener should be conveyed back to the industrial\ M/TP.

The cost of these improvements need to be shared between domestic and industrial users equally because the sludge thickener serves both customer classes. The improvement costs shown at the end of this TM reflects the industrial share of the total improvement costs.

III.6. ANAEROBIC DIGESTER
Primary and Secondary Sludge and pumped into an anaerobic digester. The anaerobic digester is not performing as intended. The gas sludge mixing system needs to be replaced and the sludge heating units are old and do not comply with air emission regulations. ln addition, some of the valves are seized and need to be replaced.

The anaerobic sludge digester needs to be cleaned and inspected. At a minimum the gas mixing system should be replaced with a new mechanical sludge mixing system and new sludge heaters should be provided. Valves and piping should be inspected and replaced as needed.

Finally, the building needs to be rehabilitated to address corrosion issues with the doors. The cost of these improvements need to be shared between domestic and industrial users equally because the anaerobic serves both customer classes. The improvement costs shown at the end of this TM reflects the industrial share of the total improvement costs. 4 397
III.7. AERATED TREATMENT POND
The aerated treatment pond receives wastewater flow after the roughing filter. The aerated treatment pond is soilcement lined and was designed with internal partition baffles that divide the pond into three equally sized cells. Each cell has an approximate capacity of 2.25 MG. Each cell is aerated. The three cells combined have a surface area of approximately 4 acres and a depth of 12 ft. Table 4 contains the amount of aeration installed in each of the treatment cells:

Table 4 - Aeration lnstalled
Aerated Treatment Pond Gell Aeration lnstalled
Cell#1 4 units @ 60 HP each
Cell#2 4 units @ 40 HP each
Cell#3 4 units @ 30 HP each
The aerated treatment pond is intended to remain full at all times. Aeration requirements vary depending on the industrial waste load. Aerators can be shut down during the low-loading season.

The internal baffle dividing Cell# 1 and Cell#2 broke and has been removed.

The aerated treatment pond is designed as a complete-mix. Solids are intended to be suspended at alltimes. Typically, effluents from complete-mix aerated lagoons contain elevated concentrations of suspended solids and must be removed by settling before the final discharge. Wastewater flows leaving the aerated treatment pond are settled at four storage ponds. Further description of the storage ponds is included in the following sections.

Accumulated solids in the aerated pond need to be removed by dredging. The liner also needs to be inspected and repaired as needed.

III.8. STORAGE PONDS
The IW\A/TF storage ponds are located south to the domestic emergency effluent storage pond and extend south to approximately the Channel Road alignment. There are four storage ponds. The first storage pond is aerated with six (6) - 20 HP floating surface aerators and the remaining three storage ponds are unaerated. The aeration in Storage Pond No. 1 is not for treatment but rather to keep the effluent fresh and relatively odor free.

All four storage ponds are lined with a high-density polyethylene (HPDE) liner to prevent erosion and ensure berm wall integrity. ln addition, Storage Ponds No. 1,2, and 3 have an 18-inch gravity overflow line. Table 5 lists the capacity of each storage pond in MG.

Table 5 - Storage Pond Capacities
Storage Pond No. Volume (MG)
1 16.3
2 21.5
3 20.5
4 17.9
The level of aeration in Storage Pond No. 1 is approximately 7.3 HP/MG and is not sufficient to provide enough oxygen during peak months. ln partially mixed aerated lagoons, the aeration demand should be capable of providing at last 1.5 lbs of oxygen per lb of BOD. Assuming a 5 398
maximum daily flow of '1.39 MGD, a maximum BOD of 2,450 mg/l and an 80 percent BOD removal in the roughing filter and aerated pond, the amount of BOD flowing in storage pond No. 1 is approximately 5,680 lbs/d. The mechanical aerators should be capable of supplying 8,520 lbs of oxygen. Using a typical oxygen transfer of 2.0 lbs of oxygen per HP per hour, the amount of aeration needed in Storage Pond No. 1 to handle the peak daily loads would be approximately 180 HP.

Therefore, additional aeration is recommended at Storage Pond No. 1 to handle the daily peak loads. The level of aeration at any given time would be adjusted to match the loads at the |\MA/TF.

Horizontal brush type floating aerators are recommended for this application to improve the distribution of incoming wastewater throughout the pond surface. Horizontal brush aerators also provide higher orygen transfer rates and are accessible from the shore for maintenance.

IV. IWWTF IMPROVEMENTS
Based on the analysis presented in this TM #2 il appears that most of the unit processes at the l\ M/TF are operating within recommended ranges even at peak flows. However, some of the unit processes require improvements. The following is a list of recommended improvements:

IV.1. HEADWORKSIMPROVEMENTS
The following are the recommended headworks improvements:

1. pH Adjustment

2. New Mechanical Bar Screen

3. Grit RemovalTank Recoating

4. Grit Piping

5. Grit Conveyor
.V.2. PRIMARYSEDIMENTATIONIMPROVEMENTS
The following are the recommended primary sedimentation improvements:

1. Recoat existing primary clarifier tank.

2. New Primary Clarifier mechanism.

IV.3. PRIMARY SLUDGE PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTS
The following are the recommended improvements to the primary sludge pump station:

1. New Primary Sludge Pumps.

2. Rehabilitation of primary sludge pump building.

IV.4. ROUGHING FILTER
The following are the recommended improvements to the roughing filter:
1 . Rehabilitate filter exterior (painting, add missing fasteners, etc.. . . ).

2. Rehabilitate concrete wet well.

IV.s. SLUDGE THIGKENER
The following are the recommended improvements to the Sludge Thickener:

1. lnstall new sludge thickener mechanism.
6 399
IV.6. ANAEROBIC DIGESTER
The following are the recommended improvements to the Anaerobic digester:

1. Empty, clean and inspect digester.

2. lnstall new mixing system.

3. lnstall new sludge heaters.

IV.7. AERATED TREATMENT POND
The following are the recommended improvements to the Aerated Treatment Pond:

1. Remove accumulated solids.

2. Replace HDPE Liner.

IV.8. STORAGE PONDS
The following are the recommended improvements to the Storage Ponds:

1. lncrease Aeration

2. Remove accumulated solids.

V. IMPROVEMENT COSTS
Table 5 contain opinions of probable construction costs for the recommended improvements:

Table 5 - Opinions of Probable Construction Gosts
lmprovement Description Estimated Cost
Headworks
pH Adjustment $100,000.00
New Mechanical Bar Screen $600,000.00
Grit Removal Tank Recoating $450,000.00
Grit Piping $150,000.00
Grit Conveyor $250,000.00
Primary Sedimentation
Primary Clarifier Concrete recoating $500,000.00
Primary Clarifi er Mechanism $750,000.00
Primary Sludge Pump Station
New Primary Pumps $140,000.00
Building Rehabilitation $25,000.00
Roughing Filter
Rehab Exterior $80,000.00
Rehab Concrete wet well $150,000.00
Sludge Thickener (50% lndustrial Share)
New Sludge Thickener Mechanism $350,000.00
Anaerobic Digester (50% lndustrial Share)
7 400
Table 5 - Opinions of Probable Gonstruction Costs
lmprovement Descriptlon Estimated Cost
Empty, clean & inspect digester $250,000.00
New mixing system $450,000.00
New sludge heaters $350,000.00
Aerated Treatment Pond
Remove Solids $1,250,000.00
Replace Liner $1,000,000.00
Ponds
lncrease Aeration $850,000.00
Remove Solids $750,000.00
Subtotal $8,445,000.00
Contingency (15%) $1,266,750.00
En g i n eeri n g, S u rveyi n g, E nvi ron m e nt al (1 0o/o) $844,500.00 Construction Adm in istration $1,266,750.00
Total $11,823,000.00
I
401
ATTACHMENT 4

ADDENDUM TO RATE STUDY
402
Olcservice
:,r::; :i,,.,',,,. i :':,,'r,ir ;i ]a
Addendum to Water and Wastewater Enterprise Financial Analysis and Rate Study For
City of Sanger
Rate Study dated: April 6, 2023
The purpose of this Addendum is to provide clarification on three items in the April 6,2023, rate study report, as follows.
. Justification of tiered rates to single-family customers. . Further explanation of cost shifting from industrial to commercial . Explanation for allocation of customer services and billing costs.

Tiered Rates and Sinole-Familv Customers
Tiered rates for single-family are based on summer peaking costs for the overall water system.

Peaking costs are quantified on page 31 for the April 6th report under "Capacity Peaking." Peaking costs are also explained on pages 1 1 and 12, including a graph. Peaking costs assigned to single family are $280,025. This is shown on page 31 and carried through the calculations.

From rate setting, the average revenue volume rate contribution to be collected from the single- family group is $0.833 per thousand gallons (ffc). This is shown on page 33 under "lncreased Volumetric Rate." This would be the rate if the single-family group did not have tiered rates.

However, the proposed rates for the single-family group as tiered are shown below and on page

34. Tier 1 0 to 6 TG/mo $0.55 /TG
fier 2 6 to 30 TG/mo $0.92 /TG
Tier 3 Above 30 TG/mo $1.42 nG
The next step is to demonstrate that the revenue collected from single-family customers above the average rate does not exceed the peaking cost of $280,025 assigned to them. This has been done in the database for single-family customers. First, in the Tier 2 group, the analysis reveals that the amount of revenue generated between the average rate of $0.833 /TG and $0.92 /TG is $50,648 per year. Second, for Tier 3, the analysis reveals that the amount of revenue generated between $0.833 /TG and $1.42 ITG is $46,614. The sum of these two values is $97,262, which is the total amount charged above the average rate. This amount is just 35 percent of the total peaking costs of $280,205 assigned to single-family. Therefore, revenue collected through tiered rates to single-family, specifically from rates above the average, is both supported by peaking costs and does not exceed the peaking cost assigned to the single-family customer group.

I5 Shasta Lane, Ilalnut Creek, CA 94597 Office: 925-946-9090 Cell: 925-899-2578 Email: [email protected] 403
Further Explanation Reqardinq lndustrial and Commercial The rate setting table on page 33 of the study (lower table) shows the commercial/other volume rate being set equalto the multi-family rate as a reasonable proxy rate because the cost-of-service volume rate for Commercial/Other is disproportionally low (upper table). The rate model, before adjustment, generated a volume rate for commercial/other that was disproportionally low at $0.33 /TG, much lower than the proposed overall system average volume rate of $1.04.

The reason the unadjusted rate setting model yields the lower volume rate is the revenue contribution from the fixed monthly charges for commercial/other is weighted upward from a larger number of meters (leading to more of a contribution from fixed monthly charges) compared to the volume of water flowing through them. For example, many commercial establishments may be required to have larger meters to accommodate flow requirements for fire protection systems.

The volume of water flowing to commercial/other customers is the smallest of the five customer groups, and just six percent of the system total volume. The sophistication of the rate model yields a numerical result that is beyond a reasonable value because the city's water system is relatively small, especially the commercial/other customer class. Specifically, there is not enough commercial/other water flow to provide a statistically consistent value. (This could have been alleviated by combining other rate classes, but the rate class distinctions are important considering just two industrial customers consume 22 percent of the city's water.) lnstead of combining defined rate classes to dampen the anomaly with commercial/other customers, the rationale was to make the adjustment between commercial/other and industrial because Commercial/Other and lndustrial both have business activity in common. Further, it can be argued that the industrial volume rate is otherwise unfairly pushed upward in the unadjusted table because industrials did not get the benefit given by other business customers operating in Sanger.

Allocation of Customer Services and Billinq Costs
The allocation of customer services and billing costs is shown on page 31 of the study. Unlike other cost components, customer services and billing costs are based on the number of customers in each customer class, not the volume of water sold. This is because the cost associated with issuing a bill or handling customer communication is based more on the customer than the volume of water sold. The baseline cost determinate for customer services and billing is the single-family residential customer, which are assigned a multiplier of "1" in the table on page

31. Apartments, schools, and commercial/other are assigned a multiplier of "3" to reflect added effort toward these non-single-family customers. The industrial customers are assigned a multiplier of "25." This is based on yielding a result of approximately 9500 per month to cover staff time to calculate manual billing statements based on effluent concentrations.

Prepared by Dan Bergmann, P.E
Principal
IGS
May 30,2023

Page 2 of 2 ends

404
ATTACHMENT 5
PROPOSITION 218 NOTICE
405

CITY OF SANGER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Regarding Proposed Water and Sewer Rate lncreases
Fiscal Year 2023-24 through 2027-28
The City Council of the City of Sanger will conduct a public hearing to consider proposed water and sewer rate increases. The date, time, and place of the public hearing is as follows:

Date:

Time:

Location
Thursday, June 15, 2023
6:00 pm
City of Sanger Council Chambers, located at 1700 7th Street, Sanger, CA 93657
This Notice is being furnished to you by the City pursuant to California Constitution Article XlllD (also known as "Proposition 218"). Proposition 218 requires that the City notify the property owners of record of proposed increases to property-related fees, such as fees for water, sewer service, solid waste, and storm drainage. This serves as notice that the City Council will conduct a public hearing, at the time, date, and location specified above, to consider recommended increases in the amounts set forth below and in the attachments to its water and sewer rates. At the hearing the City Councilwill hear and consider objections and protests to the proposed increases described in this Notice. Access to the meeting is also available by phone or internet, with specific connection information to be on the City council Meeting agenda, made available on the city's website www.ci.sanger.ca.us/agendacenter to the public at least 72 hours prior to the hearing.

Rate Study Reporfi A Rate Study Report by lGservice, dated April 6, 2023, describing details of the water and sewer rate changes and the method used to calculate the rate changes has been prepared, and the contents submitted to the City Council (Report). The Report includes the research, reasoning, and analysis behind the proposed adjustments.

The Report is incorporated into this Notice by reference and will be addressed at the Public Hearing. The Report is available at City Hall in the Finance Department and can also be found on the City website at www.ci.sanger.ca.us/rates .

Amount of Proposed Modified Rates: Existing and proposed rates are included in this Notice. For a typical home using 11,000 gallons per month, the water cost increase will be $1.77 per month in the first year, $3.22 per month in the second year, and approximately $1.47 per month during the third through fifth years. Sewer costs for residential and commercial customers are not increased until the fifth year of the planning period, at which they are increased four percent. lndustrial water and sewer rates are increased substantially to achieve cost-of-service equity. See the attached water and sewer rate tables for details of rate changes.

Reasons for the Needed lncreases in Water and Sewer Revenue: For water, the primary reason for the needed overall revenue increase is to purchase surface water to inject into the ground to preserve the City's groundwater supply, pursuant to the Sustainable Ground Water Management Act. For sewer, the overall revenue increase is needed primarily to cover ongoing inflation. For both water and sewer, cost-of-service adjustments have been made for more fairness across customer classes, which are focused on industrial customers.

Details of the rate changes for both water and sewer can be found in the Report. Revenue from the modified rates and charges will not be more than the funds required fo.r the City to 1 406
provide adequate service. Specifically, the proposed rates do not exceed the proportional cost of providing each service.

Procedure for Hearing and Determining Majority Protest: Members of the public are welcome to attend the public hearing regarding the proposed rated changes and will have an opportunity to speak and give testimony; however, only written protests as described below count toward a majority protest.

At the public hearing, the Council will hear and consider all objections and protests, if any, to the proposed increases and other matters described in the Report. The Council may continue the hearing from time to time. At the close of the hearing, if written protests against the proposed increases are presented and not withdrawn by a majority of the record owners (or customers-of-record) of the parcels which would be subject to the increases, the City may not impose the increased water and sewer rates; instead, rates would continue at their existing levels. lf, at the close of the protest hearing, there is no majority protest as described above, the Council may approve the increases, as proposed, or as changed by the Council, to be effective in the next full billing cycle.

How to Submit a Protest. Protests may be submitted by the record owner or tenant who is a customer-of-record of the parcel and subject to the proposed rates, but only one protest per parcelwill be counted. Written protests must contain a clear statement that it is a protest against the proposed increases, identify which utility (i.e. water, sewer, or both) increase is protested and it must include the name of the owner or customer of record, a description of the parcel or parcels (Assessor's Parcel Number or street address) and an original signature of the owner or customer of record. Written protests regarding the proposed rate changes may be mailed or personally delivered to: City of Sanger, City Clerk, City Hall, 17OO 7th Street, Sanger, CA 93657. To be valid, a protest must be in writing and received by the City Clerk at City Hall no later than 4 P.M. on the date of the hearing or, if presented at the hearing itself, before the close of the public hearing on June 15, 2023. Fax, e-mail, or copies of protests are not acceptable and will not be counted.

NOTE - Regarding Legal Ghallenge to Rate Adjustments: lf the Council adopts the proposed rates, you are hereby notified, pursuant to Government Code, section 53759, that any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, validate, or annul the Council's adoption of the proposed rates for water and sewer must be commenced within 120 days of the effective date or of the date of the final passage, adoption, or approval of the resolution adopting the rates.

Additional lnformation:
www. ci. sanger. ca. us/rates.

Rebeca Padron, City
bpad ron@ci. sanger. ca. us_.

For more information visit the City's website at
Please direct questions about the proposed rate proceeding to Clerk, at (559) 876-6300 x1350, or by email to
2 407
Prooosed water rates are shown in the table below. The total water service monthly charge includes the Fixed Monthly Charge plus the Volumetric Rate multiplied by the quantity of water used.

Gity of Sanger Water Rates and Charges
Current Rates
7t1t2023
Proposed Rates
711t2024 7t1t2025
100/o 4%
7t'1t2026 7t'U2027
4o/oRates ($/TG)
Single-Fanily
Upto6TG
6to30TG
30 to 100 TG
100 to 500 TG
Above 500 TG
Multi-Farily (Al VolurEs)
(All Volurrs)
rcia! (Al VolurEs)
Processing (Al Volures)
Monthly Charges ($/Mo)
Single-Fanily
Qualiffing Low Income
5/8 x 3/4" meter
l" meter
Al Other CustorEF
5/8 x 3/4" meter
1" meter

1.5" meter
2" meter
3" lvleter
4" lvleter
6" IVhter
8" [,leter
Effective
7t'U2010
Percent
Change
29%
29To
29%
0o/o
20o/o
0o/o
16',1o/o
0o/o
0%
0o/o
0%
0o/o
0%
0o/o
0%
0o/o
0%
1a/o
New Rate 4%
$0.43
$0.71
$1.10
$1.16
$1.29
$0.93
$1.14
$0.93
$0.59
$0.55
$0.92
$1.42
$1.42
$1.42
$0.93
$1.37
$0.93
$1.54
$0.61
$1.01
$1.56
$1.56
$1.56
$1.02
$1.51
$1.02
$1.69
$0.63
$1.05
$1.62
$1.62
$1.62
$1.06
$1.57
$1.06
$1.76
$0.66
$1.09
$1.68
$1.68
$1.68
$1.10
$1.63
$1.10
$1.83
$12.13
$14.83
$28.88
$14.83
$28.88
$74.'14
$1 18.61
$222.38
$370.65
$741.29
$1,297.23
$0.69
$1.13
$1.75
$1.75
$1.75
$1.14
$1.70
$1.14
$1.90
$10.19
$12.46
$24.27
$12.46
$24.27
$62.32
$99.69
$186.92
$31 1.53
$623.06
$1,090.34
$10.19
$12.46
$24.27
$'t2.46
$24.27
$62.32
$99.69
$186.92
$31 1.53
$623.06
$1,090.s4
$1 1.21
$13.71
$26.70
$13.71
$26.70
$68.55
$109.66
$205.61
$342.68
$685.37
$1,199.37
$1 1.66
$14.26
$27.77
$14.26
$27.77
$71.29
$1 14 05
$213.83
$3s6.39
$712.78
$'1,247.34
$12.62
$'t5.42
$30.04
$15.42
$30.04
$77.11
$123 35
$231.28
$385.48
$770.94
$1,349.12
Existing Custormrs Without Metels $34.63 't0% $38.09 $41.90 $43.58 $45.32 $47.13 Customers outside the city limits were preMously charged a premium for service. This additional charge is removed in the proposed rates. single-family tiered rates are presently applicable to all customers, except that above 500 TG for industrial is $0.51 per TG. Where "All Volumes,' is indicated Cunent Rates, the values shown are the average of the existing tiered rates charged for each customer group. Tiered rates are eliminated, except for single- mimimum meter size presently installed is 1 inch. The smaller 5/8" x 3/4" meters are no longer installed.

Low lncome customers receive the first 6 TG fee of charge, then pay beginning with the 6 - 30 TG rate J
408
ProposedTnnT
40k
40 Change Per ibnth
$37.32
$41.4s
4%
4%
404
$/TGMnifium
i/bnthV
$41.45
$41.45
$41.45
$3.78
$4.33
$4.89
Per Student per l/bnth
cir"
4%
$1.04
$1.51
4%
4Yo
40/.
$2.502
$223.48
$335.97
Proposed 7/1/26
Change Per lr/bnth
oo/. s35.88
o% $39.86
o%
Oo/o
oo/o
MnimJm
MonthV
$39.86
s39.86
$39.86
$/TG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Fer Student per i/bnth
o%
ooh .45$1
$1.00
i"n
4o/o
4o/o
s2.406
$214.88
$323.04
Proposed 7r1l25
o%
O'/o
Change Fer tvlonth
$35.88
$39.86
Oo/o
Oo/o
Oo/"
$/TGMniffum
[/bnthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
$3.63
$4.r6
$4.70
Per Student per [bnth
00k
oo/"
$1.00
$1.45
qi/.
4%
4%
$2.313
$206.62
$310.62
Proposed 711124
Change Per l/bnth
Oo/o $35.88
00ft $39.86
Oo/o
o%
Do/o
Mniflum
[/bnthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
$/rG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Per Student per llonth
o%
O6/o
$1.00
$1.4s
4%
4%
40/o
$2.224
$198.67
$298.67
Proposed 7r1l23
Oo/o
Oo/a
Change Per lvbnth
$35.88
939.86
o%
0%
oo/"
$/TGMnirrum
Mnthv
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Per Student per lvbnth
Ended
Ended
$1.00
$1.45Oo/"
Ended
$2.14
$191.03
$287.19
720k
298%
148o/o
Present
hr t\bnth
$35.88
s39.86
Mnirrum
tvbnthly
$39.86
$39.86
$39.86
$/TG
$3.63
$4.16
$4.70
Itr student per i/hnth
$0.84
$1.08
NewRate
$1.45
Vaiable
s1.241
$48.00
$1 16.00
City of Sanger Present and Proposed Sevrer Rates
Calegory of Service
All Single-Family Residences and
Multi-Family per unit
0 - 6,000 gallons per rmnth
Above 6,000
NorrEl: 0 - 250 nE/l BOD
Ivbdium 251 - 500 trEI BOD
Ftgh: Above 500 rq4 BOD
Commercial
Schools
K-12 without Cafeteria
K-12 with Cafeteria
EerrEntary Schools
and
Fixed wbnthv Fee
Flow, per TG flEtered potable
BOD, per thousand lbs
Suspended Solids, per thousand lbs
lndustrial Rates
lilotes:

1. hdustrial rates are set based on potable w ater nEtered, w hich is 14 percent higher than mlered influent inlo the w astew ater plant based on Fy2il22. elfeclve7l1l23, and as escalated in thefollowing planning years. dl!qE
=ilostfr
tlrn
dlEElq
-I'Ol-Elo
Blso- o)
Eo=
63 s.5
0t
(oJO+
3d
60)ooo)it
E= 8',
+O
E=
g'<oool
c)=
U,\<
€eoo)
o(cidE
Bsdo(D+
rx$ii
Efl
f;8.fco ict\<o
Cf
f+
^oo
=<4;o.oo+doqb
s.g
_J
dq3o(Da,
oa
3c
T'
or
3 =(o
cf
o
ofloooo.
o
Jo
at,
o€(D
o
9_
oo
6'l
@oJo
9_
an
0)
o
q
q)
U'
o
o.
oJ
oco-of
oo
c
J
A
409

AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PUBLICA DE LA CIUDAD DE SANGER
Propuesta de aumento de las tarifas de agua y alcantarillado Aff o fiscal:. 2023-24 a 2O27 -28
El Concilio de la Ciudad de Sanger llevard a cabo una audiencia priblica para considerar la propuesta de aumentos en las tarifas de agua y alcantarillado. La fecha, hora y lugar de la audiencia pfblica son las siguientes:

Fecha:

La hora:

Ubicaci6n
Juqves, 15 de junio de 2023
6:00 pm
C6mara del Concilio de Sanger, ubicado en 1700 7th Street, Sanger, CA 93657
La Ciudad le proporciona este Aviso de conformidad con el Articulo XlllD de la Constituci6n de California (tambi6n conocido como "Consulta Popular 218"). La Consulta Popular 218 exige que la Ciudad notifique a los propietarios registrados sobre la propuesta de los aumentos a las tarifas relacionadas con la propiedad, como las tarifas de agua, servicio de alcantarillado, residuo s6lido y drenaje pluvial. Esto sirve como aviso de que el Concilio llevar6 a cabo una audiencia p0blica, a la hora, fecha y lugar especificados anteriormente, para considerar los aumentos recomendados en las cantidades establecidas a continuaci6n y en los anexos a sus tarifas de agua y alcantarillado. En la audiencia, el Concilio dard atenci6n y considerard las observaciones a los aumentos propuestos descritos en este Aviso. El acceso a la reuni6n tambi6n est6 disponible por tel6fono o lnternet, con informaci6n de conexi6n especifica que figurar6 en el orden del dia de la reuni6n del Concilio, disponible en el sitio web de la Ciudad www.ci.sanger.ca.us/agendacenter para el priblico al menos 72 horas antes de la audiencia.
lnforme de estudio de tarifas: Se ha elaborado un lnforme de Estudio de Tarifas a cargo de lGService, con fecha del 6 de abril de 2023, en el que se describen los detalles de los cambios en las tarifas de agua y alcantarillado, y el m6todo utilizado para calcular los cambios en las tarifas, y cuyo contenido se present6 al Concilio (lnforme). El lnforme incluye la investigaci6n, el argumento y el andlisis en que se basan los ajustes propuestos. El lnforme se incorpora a este Aviso por referencia y se tratar6 en la Audiencia PUblica. El lnforme estd disponible en el Concilio en el Departamento de Finanzas y tambi6n lo encontrar6 en el sitio web de la ciudad en www.ci.sanger.ca.us/rates . lmporte de las tarifas modificadas propuestas: Se incluyen en este Aviso las tarifas existentes y propuestas. Para una vivienda normal que consuma 1 1.000 galones al mes, el aumento del costo del agua ser6 de $1.77 al mes el primer afio,$3.22 al mes el segundo afro y aproximadamente $1.47 al mes del tercer al quinto afro. Los costos de alcantarillado para usuarios residenciales y comerciales no se incrementar6n hasta el quinto afro del periodo de planificaci6n, momento en el que se incrementard en un 4o/o. Las tarifas industriales de agua y alcantarillado se incrementan sustancialmente para alcanzar la equidad en el costo del servicio. V6anse las tablas de tarifas de agua y alcantarillado adjuntas para mis detalles sobre los cambios de tarifas.

Razones de los aumentos necesarios en los ingresos por agua y alcantarillado: En el caso del agua, la raz6n principal del aumento global de ingresos necesario es la compra de aguas superficiales para inyectarla en el subsuelo con el fin de preservar el suministro de aguas subterr6neas de la ciudad, de conformidad con la Ley de Gesti6n Sostenible de Aguas 1 410
Subterr6neas. En el caso del alcantarillado, el aumento global de los ingresos es necesario principalmente para cubrir la inflaci6n en curso. Tanto para el agua como para el alcantarillado, se realizaron ajustes del costo del servicio para una mayor equidad entre los tipos de usuarios, que se centran en los usuarios industriales. En el informe se detallan las modificaciones de las tarifas de agua y alcantarillado. Los ingresos procedentes de las tarifas y tasas modificadas no superar6n los fondos necesarios para que la Ciudad preste un servicio adecuado. En concreto, las tarifas propuestas no superan el costo proporcional de la prestaci6n de cada servicio.

Procedimiento de audiencia y determinaci6n de la protesta mayoritaria: Se invita al p0blico en general a asistir a la audiencia p0blica sobre los cambios propuestos y tendr6n la oportunidad de participar y ofrecer su declaraci6n; sin embargo, s6lo se tomar6n en cuenta las protestas por escrito como se describe a continuaci6n, para una protesta mayoritaria.

En la audiencia p[blica, elConcilio considerar6 todas las observaciones, si las hubiere, a los aumentos propuestos y otros asuntos descritos en el lnforme. El Concilio podr6 prorrogar la audiencia cada cierto tiempo. Al t6rmino de la audiencia, si se presentan protestas por escrito contra los aumentos propuestos y no son retiradas por la mayorla de los propietarios registrados (o usuarios registrados) de las propiedades que estarian sujetas a los aumentos, la Ciudad no podr6 imponer el aumento de las tarifas de agua y alcantarillado; en su lugar, las tarifas continuar6n en sus niveles actuales. Si, al t6rmino de la audiencia, no existe una protesta mayoritaria como se ha descrito anteriormente, el Concilio podr5 aprobar los aumentos, tal como se proponen, o modificados por el Concilio, para que entren en vigor en el pr6ximo ciclo completo de facturaci6n.

C6mo presentar una protesta. Las protestas pueden ser presentadas por el propietario registrado o el inquilino que sea usuario registrado de la propiedad y este sujeto a las tarifas propuestas, pero s6lo se tendr6 en cuenta una protesta por propiedad. Las protestas por escrito deberdn contener una declaraci6n clara de que se trata de una protesta contra los aumentos propuestos, identificar el tipo de aumento del servicio p0blico (es decir, agua, alcantarillado o ambos) es objeto de protesta y deberS incluir el nombre del propietario o usuario registrado, una descripci6n de la propiedad o propiedades (n0mero de propiedad del tasador o direcci6n de domicilio) y una firma original del propietario o usuario registrado. Las protestas por escrito con respecto a los cambios de tarifas propuestos pueden enviarse por correo o entregarse personalmente a. City of Sanger, City Clerk, City Hall, 1700 7th Street, Sanger, CA 93657. Para que una protesta sea v6lida, deberd presentarse por escrito y ser recibida por la Secretaria Municipal en el Concilio a m6s tardar a las 4 p.m. de la fecha de la audiencia o, si se presenta en la audiencia misma, antes del cierre de la audiencia p0blica el 15 de iunio de 2023. No se aceptardn, ni se tomar6n en cuenta protestas por fax, correo electr6nico, o copias de las mismas.

NOTA - En relaci6n con la impugnaci6n legal de los ajustes de tarifas: Si el Concilio adopta las tarifas propuestas, por la presente se le notifica, de conformidad con el C6digo de Gobierno, secci6n 53759, que cualquier acci6n o procedimiento judicial para atacar, revisar, anular, invalidar, validar o anular la adopci6n del Concilio de las tarifas propuestas para el agua y alcantarillado deberd iniciarse dentro de los 120 dias de la fecha de vigencia o de la fecha de la aprobaci6n final, adopci6n o aprobaci6n de la resoluci6n por la que se adoptan las tarifas.
lnformaci5n adicional:
www. ci. sanger. ca. us/rates
Para mds informaci6n, visite el sitio web de la ciudad en Por favor, dirija sus consultas sobre el procedimiento de tarifas 2 411
propuesto a Rebeca Padr6n, Secretaria Municipal, al (559) 876-6300 x1350, o porcorreo electr6nico a [email protected] .

Las tarifas de aqua proouestas se muestran en la siguiente tabla. La cuota mensual total del servicio de agua incluye la cuota mensualfija m6s la cuota volum6trica multiplicada por la cantidad de agua utilizada.

Tarifas de agua de la Ciudad de Sanger
Tarifas propuestas
Tarifas 1 de julio, 1 de julio,
actuales 1 de julio, 2023 2024 2025
, fJjJll":!3,, ff",*n u,",,:" 1oo/o 4o/oTarifas volu m6tricas ($nG) Todas las viviendas unifamiliares
Hasta 6 TG
6-30TG
30 - 100 TG
100 - 500 TG
M6s de 500 TG
Multifamiliares (Todos los
volf menes)
Escuelas (Todos los volfmenes)
Comercial (todos los vol(menes)
lnd ustria/elaboraci6n de
alimentos (todos los volImenes)
Gargos fijos mensuales ($/Mo)
Unifamiliar
Bajos ingresos que re0nen
requisitos
Medidor de 5/8 x 3/4
Medidor de 1
Todos los demSs usuarios
Medidor de 5/8 x 3/4
Medidor de 1
Medidor de 1,5
Medidor de 2
Medidor de 3
Medidor de 4
Medidor de 6
Medidor de 8
$0.43
$0.71
$1.10
$1.16
$1.29
$0.93
$1.14
$0.93
$0.59
$1 0.1 9
$12.46
$24.27
$12.46
$24.27
$62.s2
$99.69
$186.92
$311.53
$623.06
$1,090.34
Oo/o
20o/o
0o/o
1610/o
$0.55
$0.92
$1.42
$1.42
$1.42
$0.e3
$1.37
$0.93
$1.54
$12.46
$24.27
$62.32
$99.69
$186.92
$311.53
$623.06
$1,090.34
$0.61
$1.01
$1.56
$1.56
$1.56
$1.02
$1.51
$1.02
$1.69
$13.71
$26.70
$68.55
$109.66
$205.61
$342.68
$685.37
$1,199.37
$0.63
$1.05
$1.62
$1.62
$1.62
$1.06
$1.57
$1.06
$1.76
$0.66
$1.09
$1.68
$1.68
$1.68
$1 .10
$1.63
$1.10
$1.83
29o/o
29o/o
29o/o
1 de julio,
2026
4o/o
1 de julio,
2027
4%
$0.69
$1 .13
$1.75
$1.75
$1.75
$1.14
$1.70
$1.14
$1.e0
$15.42
$30.04
$77.11
$123.35
$231.28
$385.48
$770.94
$1,349.12
a
0o/o
0o/o
0%
Oo/o
0o/o
0o/o
Oo/o
0o/o
0o/o
Oo/o
0o/o
$10.1 e $11.21 $1 1 .66 $12.13 $12.62
$12.46 $13.71 $14.26 $14.83 $15.42
$24.27 $26.70 $27.77 $28.88 $30.04
$14.26 $14.83
$27.77 $28.88
$71.29 $74.14
$1 14.05 $1 18.61
$213.83 $222.38
$356.39 $370.65
$712.78 $741.29
$1,247.34 $1,297.23
Usuarios existentes sin medidor $34.63 10o/o $38.09 $41.90 $43.58 $45.32 $47.13 Notas:

A los usuarios que esten fuera de los limites de la ciudad se les cobraba antes una prima por el servicio. Este costo adicional se suprime en las tarifas propuestas.

Las tarifas escalonadas unifamiliares se aplican actualmente a todos los usuarios, con la excepci6n de que por encima de 500 TG para industriales es de 0,51 $ por TG. Cuando se indica "Todos los vol[menes" para las tarifas actuales, los valores mostrados son la media de las tarifas escalonadas existentes aplicadas a cada grupo de usuarios. Se eliminan las tarifas escalonadas, excepto para unifamiliares.

El tamaffo minimo del medidor instalado actualmente es de 1 pulgada. Los medidores mds pequefros de 5/8" x 3/4" ya no se instalan.

Los usuarios con bajos ngresos qu nan lasreu los req uisitos recibi16n nmeras 6 TG gratuitas v posteriormente pagardnp de a tarifa de 6 30 TG
J
412
Las tarif?s de alcantarillado oropuestas se muestran en la siguiente tabla. Las tarifas mensuales se fijan en funcion del tipo de usuario identificado. La tarifa dealcantarillado propuesta corresponderd a una cuota fija por cadL unidad residencial ocupada de manera in'dependiente (ya sea vivienda unifamiliar o unidad de viviendamultifamiliar) conectada al sistema colector de alcantarillado. Las escuelas pagar5n en funci6n del n6mero de alumnos.

Propuesta
1deiulio.2027
Modif. Por mes
4o/o $37.32
4% $41.45
Minimo
mensual
$/TG
4o/o $41.45
$3.78
4o/o $41.45
$4.33
4o/o $41.45
$4.89
Por estudiante y
mes
$1.04
$1.s1
4o/o
4%
$2.502
$223.48
$335.97
+ito
4o/o
4o/o
Propuesta
1 de iulio. 2026
Modif. Por mes
0o/o $35.88
0o/o $39.86
Minimo
mensual
$/TG
Oo/o
Oo/o
Oo/o
$39.86
$3.63
$39.86
$4.1 6
$39.86
$4.70
Por estudiante y
mes
O"t"
o%
$1.00
$1.45
$2.406
$214.88
$323.04
ir"
4o/o
4%
Propuesta
1 de julio, 2025
Modif. Por mes
jYo $35.88
0o/o $39.86
Minimo
mensual
$/TG
Oo/o $39.86
$3.63
Oo/o $39.86
$4.1 6
0o/o $39.86
$4.70
Por estudiante y
mes
$1.00
$1.45
Oo/o
Oo/o
$2.313
$206.62
$310.62
4o/o
4o/o
4%
Propuesta
1deiulio,2024
Por mes
$35.88
$39.86
Modif
0To
0o/o
Minimo
mensual
$/TG
0o/o $39.86
$3.63
$39.86
$4.1 6
$39.86
$4.70
0o/o
0o/o
Por estudiante y
mes
O"t"
0%
$1.00
$1.45
$2.224
$198.67
$298.67
+it"
4o/o
4o/o
Propuesta
1 de iulio, 2023
0o/o
0%
Modif Por mes
$35.88
$39.86
Minimo
mensual
$/TG
0o/o $39.86
$3.63
0% $3e.86
$4.16
0o/o $39 86
$4.70
Por estudiante y
mes
Finalizado
Finalizado
$1.00
$1.45Oo/o
72o/o
298%
148o/o
Finalizado
$2.14
$191.03
$287.19
Presente
Por mes
$35.88
$39.86
Minimo
mensual
$/TG
$39.86
$3.63
$39.86
$4.16
$39.86
$4.70
Por estudiante y
mes
$0.84
$1.08
Nueva tarifa
$1.45
Variable
$1.241
$48.00
$116.00
Tarifas de alcantarillado actuales de la ciudad de
Categoria de servicio
Todas las residencias unifamiliares y
multifamiliares por unidad
0 - 6.000 galones al mes
Por encima de 6.000
Comercial
Normal: 0 - 250 mg/l BOD
Medio: 251 - 500 mg/l BOD
Alta: Superior a 500 mg/l de BOD
Escuelas
K-12 sin cafeteria
K-12 con cafeteria
Escuelas primarias
Centros de ensehanza media y
secundaria
Tarifas industrialesl,2
Cuota mensualfija
Caudal, por TG potable medido
BOD, por mil lbs
56lidos en suspensi6n, por mil lbs

1. Las tarifas industriales se fijan en funcion del agua potable medida, que es un 14o/o superior a la afluencia medida a laplanta de aguas residuales segfn el afio fiscal 21122. la
que
ser
de
2023
caso
de
el
deberSn
En
tarifas
ciudad
de
la
to
de
constante.
estudel
ente
uales
con
ificaci6n
resid
ncia
relativam
na
de
aguas de
conso
anos
n E
planta
permanezca
la
uientes
de
ibrado.ut
os
afluente
iento
en
reeq
m
del
ser
nes
berS
funciona
incremente
de
de
SE
ncentracio
dos
co
un
costos
las
los
de
Suspend
202
mente
global
e d
S6lidos
cial
no
to
v
tib
ustan
de
equ
BOD
1 elUC
del
q
audal,c
reduzcanse
entre
TG
peditados
uente
tasas
su
afl
las
de
de
est6nles
los
librio
globales
lala
equr
dustria
el
in
v
on
icesnd
total
concentraciones
Los 2.
las
reevaluados,
tarifa
Notas
4 413

Sanger City CouncilJune 15, 2023

Sanger City Council
June 15, 2023