AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW 72 HOURS
PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AT THE SANGER LIBRARY, CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AND
THE SANGER CITY HALL
LOBBY.
AGENDA
SANGER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
THURSDAY , JANUARY 15, 2026
6:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER
1700 7TH Street, Sanger, California 93657
Levine Act Disclosure. P u r s u a n t t o t h e L e v i n e A c t ( G o v t C o d e S e c ti o n 8 4 3 0 8 ) , a n y p a r t y t o a p e r m i t , license, contract, or other entitlement before the City Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $ 500 made by the party or the party’s agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well.
The disclosure should be made when the agenda item is called and must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution, the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made. Council Members are also required to make such disclosures and recuse themselves.
Conflicts of Interest. Council Members are required to disclose conflicts of interests and recuse themselves.
Prior to action by the Council on any item on this agenda, the public may comment on that item.
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. OPENING CEREMONIES
Invocation
Flag Salute
Roll Call
C. AGENDA APPROVAL, ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS
D. C
EREMONIAL MATTERS- NONE
E. P
RESENTATIONS- NONE
F. P
UBLIC FORUM
(This portion of the meeting is reserved for members of the public who wish to address the Council on any matter not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. Speakers shall address all comments to the Mayor and the Council as a body and not to any particular Council Member or member of the staff. Speakers are asked, but not required, to state their name and address. The Council is prohibited by law from taking action on items not on the agenda.)
1 City Council Agenda
January 15, 2026
G. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Matters listed under the consent calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, a member of the audience or a Council Member may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and it will be considered separately.)
1. SUBJECT: Minutes of Regular Council Meeting and Special Meeting held on December 18, 2025.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve.
2. SUBJECT: Payroll for the month of December, including Direct Deposit Nos. 68462 through 68710, Payroll Check Nos. 60701 through 60735, and Benefit C
heck Nos. 2170 through 2181.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve.
3. SUBJECT: Warrants, including Check Nos. 96142 through 96330, for the month of December 2025.
RECOMMENDATION: Informational Item.
4. SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report-December 2025 RECOMMENDATION: Informational Item.
5. SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report-December 2025 RECOMMENDATION: Informational Item.
6. SUBJECT: Receipt of Update on Emergency Repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant Pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-95 a nd Request to Continue Declaration of Emergency
RECO
MMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution 2026-01 continuing the Declaration of Emergency and receive the report from City Manager Regarding Emergency repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant per Resolution No. 2025-95.
7. SUBJECT: Amendment to CSG Consultant Agreement for Community Development Services and Associated Resolution 2026 -02 Approving a Budget Amendment.
RECO
MMENDATION: That the City Council ratify the City Manager’s approval of an amendment to extend the consultant agreement for Community Development Services between City and CSG Consultants to provide as-needed Community Development Services through June 30, 2026, and approve a budget amendment for $115,024 to implement the same.
2 City Council Agenda
January 15, 2026
8. SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Sanger and Sanger Police Officers Association
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Sanger and Sanger Police Officers Association (SPOA) for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, and authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU.
9. SUBJECT: Disclosure of concurrent representation of the South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency by the City Attorney’s law firm.
RECOMMENDATION: That By minute action, acknowledge concurrent representation.
10. SUBJECT: Out of State Travel Request
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approves the out of State travel and training for the Fire Department Executive Assistant and Billing Clerk to attend the National Conference on Ambulance Revenue Cycle, Management and Compliance (abc360) in Las Vegas, Nevada from April 14 – 16, 2026.
11. SUBJECT: Technical Service Support Agreement with Stryker Medical RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the technical support agreement between the City of Sanger and Stryker Medical and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.
H. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1. SUBJECT: Review and Acceptance of the City of Sanger – Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the City of Sanger - Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report conducted by AM Consulting Engineers and authorize the Public Works Director or designee to submit the report and proposed updated local limits to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for review and approval.
I. PUBLIC HEARING
1. SUBJECT: Tract 6531 – Serenade II Subdivision - Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), General Plan Amendment No. 2025 -0 1 (GPA 2025-01), Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02 (ZOA 2025-02) RE
COMMENDATION: That the City Council:
a. Waive the full reading and introduce, by title only, Ordinance No. 2026-01 an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Sanger adopting Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025 -02 ( ZOA 2025 -02) rezoning the Project area from R -1-6 (Single Family Residential) to the R -1-7.5 (Single Family Residential) zone district
3 City Council Agenda
January 15, 2026
b. Approve General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01 (GPA 2025-01) changing the General Plan Land Use Designation of approximately 10 acres within the Project area from Medium Density Residential to Medium Low Density Residential
c. Adopt Resolution 2026-03, Approving the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Plan and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMRP) prepared for Tract 6531, General Plan Amendment No. 2025 -01, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02.
J. CITY MANAGER/STAFF COMMUNICATION
K. REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS (This portion of the meeting is reserved for the Mayor and Council Members (i) to make brief reports on boards, committees, and other public agencies, and at public events, (ii) to initiate new matters and to request updates, and to initiate new agenda items. Under this section, the Council may take action only on any items specifically agendized and which meet other requirements for action.)
L. ADJOURNMENT
I certify under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Dated thi s 9th Day of January 2026.
Lina Martinez, City Clerk
4 City Council Agenda
January 15, 2026
ADA COMPLIANCE AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY . The Council has adopted a Reasonable Accommodation Policy which is available on the City website at www.ci.sanger.ca.us or upon request by emailing the City Clerk at [email protected]. The Policy provides a procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation to participate in this meeting. If you need assistance in order to attend this Council meeting or require auxiliary aids or services, e.g., hearing aids or signing services to make a presentation to the Council, please email the City Clerk or call by phone at (559) 876-6300 extension 1350 so such aids or services can be arranged. Accommodations should be requested as early as possible as additional time may be required in order to provide the requested accommodation.
TRANSLATION SERVICES. Translation services in Spanish will be provided upon request.
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF AGENDA DOCUMENTS. Writings related to the agenda are available at Sanger City Hall, 1700 7th Street, Sanger, CA 93657 and are posted online at www.ci.sanger.ca.us. Writings provided to a majority of the City Council within 72 hours of the meeting regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office located at Sanger City Hall, 1700 7 th Street, Sanger, CA 93567 and will be posted online at www.ci.sanger.ca.us.
5 Minutes for Special Council Meeting
TH
URSDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2025
5:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER
1700 7TH Street, Sanger, California 93657
A. CAL
L TO ORDER
The
Special Meeting of the City Council was called to order at 5:12 PM.
B. RO
LL CALL
Pr
esent: Mayor Frank Gonzalez, Council Member Esmeralda Hurtado, Council Member Michael Montelongo
Ab
sent: Mayor Pro Tem Daniel Martinez, Council Member Dolores Melendez C. AGE
NDA APPROVAL
The
Council by motion of Council Member Montelongo approved the agenda as posted. The motion was seconded by Council Member Hurtado, and approved by the following vote:
AYE
S: GONZALEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ, MELENDEZ
D. PUB
LIC FORUM - NONE
E. CL
OSED SESSION
Th
e Council adjourned to Closed Session at 5:13 pm.
1. Pur
suant to Government Code Section 54957.6
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Shelline Bennett, Lead Negotiator, Amanda Champion, HR Manager.
Employee Organizations: Sanger General Employees Organization, Sanger Middle Management Organization, Sanger Police Officers Association, Sanger Firefighters Association, Unrepresented/Confidential Employees and Executive Employees G-1
6 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
December 18, 2025
2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Deciding whether to initiate litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
One Case
The Council reconvened the Special Meeting at 6:00 pm.
F. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
No reportable Action
G. ADJOURNMENT
Being no further business, the Council adjourned their Special Meeting at 6:00 pm.
ATTEST:
Lina Martinez, City Clerk
7 Minutes for Regular Council Meeting
T
HURSDAY , DECEMBER 18, 2025
6:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER
1700 7TH Street, Sanger, California 93657
A. CALL TO ORDER
T
he City Council called their meeting to order at 6:00 pm.
B. OPENING CEREMONIES
Th
e invocation was offered by Pastor Paul Canaday
T
he flag salute was led by Mayor Frank Gonzalez.
R
oll Call:
P
resent: Mayor Frank Gonzalez, Council Member Esmeralda Hurtado, Council Member Michael Montelongo, Council Member Dolores Melendez
A
bsent: Mayor Pro Tem Daniel Martinez
A
ttendance- Mayor Pro Tem Daniel Martinez arrived at 6:14 pm C. A
GENDA APPROVAL, ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS
T
he Council by motion of Council Member Michael Montelongo approved the agenda as posted.
The motion was seconded by Council Member Dolores Melendez and approved by the following vote:
AY
ES: GONZALEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ
D. C
EREMONIAL MATTERS
NONE
8 City Council Meeting Minutes
December 18, 2025
E. PRESENTATIONS-
NONE
F. PUBLIC FORUM
NONE
G. CONSENT CALENDAR
By motion of Council Member Montelongo, the Council approved all Consent Calendar Items. The motion was seconded by Council Member Hurtado and passed by the following vote:
AYES: GONZALEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MARTINEZ
1. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Minutes of Regular Council Meeting and Special Meeting held on December 4, 2025.
2. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Payroll for the month of November including Direct Deposit Nos. 68219 through 68461; Payroll check Nos. 60666 through 60699; and Benefit Check Nos. 2162 through 2169.
3. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Warrants including Check Nos. 95965 through 96141 for the month of November 2025.
4. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Fire Department Monthly Report-November 2025
5. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Police Department Monthly Report-November 2025
6. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Receipt of Update on Emergency Repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant Pursuant to Resolution No. 2025 -89 and Request to Continue Declaration of Emergency
7. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Approve amendments for Wells 12 and 14 Rehabilitation
8. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Sanger and Sanger Firefighter Association
9. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Program Technician Job Description
10. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Final Acceptance for Well 22 Facilities and Site Improvement Project
9 City Council Meeting Minutes
December 18, 2025
11. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Request for Out-of-State Travel – FBI National Academy
12. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Designated signatories for City of Sanger Financial Accounts.
H. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1. SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL ONLY -Investment Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2025
2. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Tract 6493 -North and Indianola Avenues -Approval of Storm Drain Basin Land Purchase Agreement
By motion of Council Member Montelongo, the Council approved Item H-2. The motion was seconded by Council Member Hurtado and passed by the following vote:
AYES: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
I. CITY MANAGER/STAFF COMMUNICATION
• Updates given by City Manager, Nathan Olson
J. REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
• Updates given by Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, Council Member Hurtado, Council Member Melendez, Council Member Montelongo and Mayor Gonzalez
K. ADJOURNMENT
Being no further business, the Council adjourned their meeting at 6:24 pm.
ATTEST:
Lina Martinez, City Clerk
10 Prepared by: Lina Martinez _ Approved by: Nathan Olson_________________
REVIEW: City Manager: _NCO_______ Finance: ________ City Attorney: ________ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION X Consent
X Info Item
____ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency
____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2026
Agenda Item No: G-2
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karla Camarena, Finance Manager
Subject: Approval of Payroll Checks- December 2025
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the payroll for the month of December, including Direct Deposit Nos. 68462 through 68710, Payroll Check Nos. 60701 through 60735, and Benefit Check Nos. 2170 through 2181.
11 12/04/2025 City of Sanger 9:38AM
11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 1
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA
BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68462 12/5/2025 0.00 2,860.48CHAMPION,
AMANDA
68463 12/5/2025 0.00 2,453.80DELGADO, SIERRA
68464
12/5/2025 0.00 2,293.90JACKSON, BRIONNE
68465 12/5/2025 0.00 1,937.45MARTINEZ, LINA
68466 12/5/2025 0.00 5,600.19OLSON, NATHAN
68467 12/5/2025 0.00 303.33GONZALEZ, FRANK G
68468 12/5/2025 0.00 312.56MARTINEZ, DANIEL
68469 12/5/2025 0.00 312.56MELENDEZ, DOLORES
68470 12/5/2025 0.00 312.56MONTELONGO, MICHAEL A
68471 12/5/2025 0.00 1,482.88BARRAGAN, CASIMIRO
68472 12/5/2025 0.00 1,627.01CUEVAS, ERIC
68473 12/5/2025 0.00 3,401.08GOGGINS, JOSHUA
68474 12/5/2025 0.00 1,531.11MURPHY, ROSE
68475 12/5/2025 0.00 1,981.31SANDOVAL, PAUL
68476 12/5/2025 0.00 2,119.55TOVAR, CARLOS
68477 12/5/2025 0.00 429.03VIDRIO, JAVIER
68478 12/5/2025 0.00 3,420.74CAMARENA, KARLA D.
68479 12/5/2025 0.00 1,823.81CASILLAS-TORRES, SMALYNNE 68480 12/5/2025 0.00 1,286.34DE ORTA, MICHELLE
68481 12/5/2025 0.00 1,590.38FLORIAN, STEPHANIE
68482 12/5/2025 0.00 3,384.36HARMON, VIRGINIA
68483 12/5/2025 0.00 702.39NORIEGA, LESLIE
68484 12/5/2025 0.00 1,392.46PEREZ ZUNIGA, MAYRA E
68485 12/5/2025 0.00 1,387.70RAMIREZ, MICHELE
68486 12/5/2025 0.00 2,198.40WAHL, LEICA KATHRINA LACAY 68487 12/5/2025 0.00 2,122.69ALDAZ, MARCO
68488 12/5/2025 0.00 1,957.84ALONSO, JULIA
68489 12/5/2025 0.00 1,647.18CASTELLANOS, LINDSAY
68490 12/5/2025 0.00 3,085.32CORONADO JR, JESUS
68491 12/5/2025 0.00 1,577.04CUELLAR, ADRIANA
68492 12/5/2025 0.00 1,708.17DELGADILLO, ANGEL
68493 12/5/2025 0.00 1,842.32DOLAN, HAYDEN
68494 12/5/2025 0.00 2,043.76ELLIS, SKYLER
68495 12/5/2025 0.00 1,389.10ESCOBAR, MICHAEL
68496 12/5/2025 0.00 2,256.09HOULE, BAILEY
68497 12/5/2025 0.00 1,585.41JACKSON, COLBY
68498 12/5/2025 0.00 1,732.64JAECKEL, AVA
68499 12/5/2025 0.00 9,612.35JONES, ANDY
Page: 1
12 12/04/2025 City of Sanger 9:38AM
11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 2
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA
BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68500 12/5/2025 0.00 1,540.95LANG, JUSTIN
68501
12/5/2025 0.00 3,022.21LORENTE, RYAN
68502
12/5/2025 0.00 1,665.01MCWILLIAMS, SOFIA
68503 12/5/2025 0.00 1,944.94PALLAS, MICHAEL L
68504 12/5/2025 0.00 2,368.76PISCHING, MARK G
68505 12/5/2025 0.00 4,597.02PITTS, CRAIG
68506 12/5/2025 0.00 1,869.54SALAZAR, GARRETT
68507 12/5/2025 0.00 2,173.12SANDERS, GERALD
68508 12/5/2025 0.00 756.36SPANGLE, JENNIFER
68509 12/5/2025 0.00 3,403.83TARASCOU, GREGORY
68510 12/5/2025 0.00 2,206.54TREVINO, SANDRA
68511 12/5/2025 0.00 1,851.10VELASQUEZ, SHERRY
68512 12/5/2025 0.00 5,897.41WADDLE, CHRISTOPHER A.
68513 12/5/2025 0.00 1,493.70WASHBURN, HAIDYN
68514 12/5/2025 0.00 4,074.07WILLIAMS, KENNETH D.
68515 12/5/2025 0.00 3,605.77WILSON, TODD
68516 12/5/2025 0.00 2,446.45ZEPEDA, LEONARDO
68517 12/5/2025 0.00 3,456.59ACEVES CRUZ, JULIAN
68518 12/5/2025 0.00 2,548.81ARGUELLO, SERGIO
68519 12/5/2025 0.00 1,983.23BANDA-TOVAR, JOEL
68520 12/5/2025 0.00 1,882.30BARRAGAN, MELISSA
68521 12/5/2025 0.00 2,843.68BISE, JEFFREY L.
68522 12/5/2025 0.00 3,563.42BOUST, JASON
68523 12/5/2025 0.00 1,066.74CAMPBELL, SARAH L
68524 12/5/2025 0.00 3,098.51CASTREJON, EDDIE
68525 12/5/2025 0.00 2,656.87DIAZ, HENRY
68526 12/5/2025 0.00 2,631.64EDWARDS, SHAELA
68527 12/5/2025 0.00 2,012.88FRANCO, RICHARD
68528 12/5/2025 0.00 3,187.00GARCIA, FERNANDO
68529 12/5/2025 0.00 3,754.84GARZA, RAMIRO
68530 12/5/2025 0.00 3,395.79GUILLEN, ROSARIO
68531 12/5/2025 0.00 1,585.31HERNANDEZ, ANDREINA
68532 12/5/2025 0.00 1,799.83HUGHES, TOBIAS
68533 12/5/2025 0.00 2,633.34INOSTROS, JESSICA
68534 12/5/2025 0.00 3,769.04JOHNSON, JOSHUA D
68535 12/5/2025 0.00 1,896.48JONES, KIMBERLY M.
68536 12/5/2025 0.00 1,856.57KAUR, MANDEEP
68537 12/5/2025 0.00 1,413.72MEDINA, JOSE
Page: 2
13 12/04/2025 City of Sanger 9:38AM
11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 3
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA
BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68538 12/5/2025 0.00 1,927.91MENDEZ, GERARD
68539
12/5/2025 0.00 2,742.93MORALES, JESSE
68540 12/5/2025 0.00 2,092.64MORENO, LOUIS A
68541 12/5/2025 0.00 3,731.40MUNOZ, BER
THA J
68542 12/5/2025 0.00 2,381.84NELSON, AMANDA M
68543 12/5/2025 0.00 2,131.51PACHECO, JOSE
68544 12/5/2025 0.00 3,259.82REYNOLDS, JOHN
68545 12/5/2025 0.00 2,093.64ROARK, TYLER
68546 12/5/2025 0.00 1,986.42RODRIGUEZ, JULIAN R
68547 12/5/2025 0.00 1,583.12RYAN, NICOLE
68548 12/5/2025 0.00 2,683.53SANCHEZ, KELSEY
68549 12/5/2025 0.00 2,140.60SOTO, JOSE O.
68550 12/5/2025 0.00 1,922.59THAO, MENOU A
68551 12/5/2025 0.00 2,776.29TORRES, ROBERT C
68552 12/5/2025 0.00 2,442.48TREVINO, CYNTHIA
68553 12/5/2025 0.00 1,191.46VARELA, TERRI
68554 12/5/2025 0.00 1,475.62WELCH, PAUL M.
68555 12/5/2025 0.00 3,157.51YAMBUPAH, ANGELA C
68556 12/5/2025 0.00 2,178.61ACOSTA, JAVIER
68557 12/5/2025 0.00 1,353.37AVALOS, JORGE
68558 12/5/2025 0.00 2,268.99BARBA CORTES, ERIKA
68559 12/5/2025 0.00 1,302.40CABRERA, MARTIN
68560 12/5/2025 0.00 2,398.80CHOLICO, EDGAR
68561 12/5/2025 0.00 1,717.19EGGLESTON, STEVEN
68562 12/5/2025 0.00 2,452.91FLUETSCH, JOHN
68563 12/5/2025 0.00 3,083.36GONZALEZ, EDDIE
68564 12/5/2025 0.00 1,374.87GONZALEZ, JUAN
68565 12/5/2025 0.00 1,676.82HUERTA, PAUL
68566 12/5/2025 0.00 1,473.51IRAZOQUI, DANIEL T
68567 12/5/2025 0.00 2,690.27JASSO, GEORGE
68568 12/5/2025 0.00 2,003.84LOPEZ, ALEX
68569 12/5/2025 0.00 2,259.65LOPEZ, DIEGO
68570 12/5/2025 0.00 2,077.89MARTIN, RAYMOND
68571 12/5/2025 0.00 1,638.05MAZARIEGO, MANUEL
68572 12/5/2025 0.00 1,509.09ORONA, CATARINO
68573 12/5/2025 0.00 1,296.99PIMENTEL, SEAN
68574 12/5/2025 0.00 2,402.87REYES, ANTONIO P
68575 12/5/2025 0.00 2,970.86ROSALES, ESPERANZA
Page: 3
14 12/04/2025 City of Sanger 9:38AM
11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 4
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA
BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68576 12/5/2025 0.00 1,549.78SANT
OS, WILLIAM
68577 12/5/2025 0.00 2,180.15WOODS, STEVE
68578
12/5/2025 0.00 547.74HERNANDEZ, KEITH
68579 12/5/2025 0.00 576.95MENDOZA, GRICELDA
68580 12/5/2025 0.00 1,779.10ALBARRAN-PEREZ, VIANEY
68581 12/5/2025 0.00 298.42BARAJAS, LIZETTE
68582 12/5/2025 0.00 535.04DENISTON, CATALINA
68583 12/5/2025 0.00 256.99PETRILLE, BRIANA
68584 12/5/2025 0.00 1,247.57VASQUEZ, APRIL
68585 12/5/2025 0.00 2,136.11ZAMORA, JOAQUIN
0.00 269,618.16Employee Check T
otals
0.00 269,618.16Bank dirdep T
otals (124 Forms)
Page: 4
15 12/04/2025 City of Sanger 9:38AM
11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 5
Bank: pybank - WESTAMERICA
BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60701 12/5/2025 307.56 0.00HUR
TADO, ESMERALDA
60702
12/5/2025 1,731.50 0.00IRAZOQUI, MARIO
60703 12/5/2025 1,733.45 0.00LITTLE, LYNDSEE
60704 12/5/2025 2,265.10 0.00AYALA, RAMIRO
60705 12/5/2025 2,717.39 0.00PEREZ, SILVESTRE
60706 12/5/2025 1,308.83 0.00REYES, ALEJANDRO
60707 12/5/2025 297.13 0.00PRADO, BRANDON
10,360.96 0.00Employee Check T
otals
Bank: pybank - WEST
AMERICA BANK
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60708 12/5/2025
026 98.86 0.00AFLAC
60709 12/5/2025 057 2,664.40 0.00AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE 60710
12/5/2025 021 151.16 0.00FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
60711 12/5/2025 052 954.50 0.00SANGER FIRE ASSOCIATION, FOOD 60712 12/5/2025 045 1,151.52 0.00STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 60713 12/5/2025 007 410.41 0.00STATIONARY ENGINEERS, LOCAL 39 5,430.85Total 0.00
5,430.85 0.00 Payee T
otals
15,791.81 0.00Bank pybank T
otals (13 Forms)
Page: 5
16 12/04/2025 City of Sanger 9:38AM
1 1/15/2025 to 11/28/2025- T
ype 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 6
Bank: wire -
FEDERAL T AX PAYMENT
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check
Amt Direct Deposit
2170
12/5/2025 003 92,722.33 0.00WESTAMERICA
BANK
2171 12/5/2025 004 13,703.00 0.00EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 2172 12/5/2025 006 1,366.22 0.00I.C.M.A RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2173 12/5/2025 054 2,695.02 0.00CALPERS 457 PLAN
1 10,486.57Total 0.00
1 10,486.57 0.00 Payee Totals
1 10,486.57 0.00Bank wire Totals (4 Forms)
Grand T
otal 126,278.38 269,618.16
395,896.54Next Step: Account Posting (AP)
Pay Period is Open (Locked)
T
otals Checks and Direct Deposit (141 Forms)
Page: 6
17 12/04/2025 City of Sanger 9:38AM
11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 7
Check # Date Payee # Name Amount
Benefit Checks - pending for pay period from 11/29/25 to 12/12/25 ID: 1,160 12/19/2025 030 MID-MANAGEMENT ASSN, DUES-MM
Source pay period: 1
1/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:midmgmtpa mmdues 101 117.00 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025 Cycle 26 midmgmtpa mmdues 611 19.50 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025 Cycle 26 midmgmtpa mmdues 621 19.50 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 midmgmtpa mmdues 712 39.00 ID: 1,159 Check Total: 195.00
12/19/2025 059 TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Source pay period: 11/15/2025 to 1
1/28/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:hlthpay txslfe 101 289.69 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 hlthpay txslfe 208 312.10 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 hlthpay txslfe 261 20.74 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 hlthpay txslfe 712 9.24 ID: 1,159 Check Total: 631.77
12/19/2025 041 GENERAL EMPLOYEES ASSN, DUES GEN EMPS
Source pay period: 1
1/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:genemppay gendue 101 5.00 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 genemppay gendue 712 5.00 ID: 1,159 Check Total: 10.00
12/19/2025 008 SANGER FIRE ASSOCIATION, DUES-FIRE
Source pay period: 1
1/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:firduepay freasn 101 662.12 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 firduepay freasn 208 318.80 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 firduepay freasn 261 31.20 ID: 1,159 Check Total: 1,012.12
12/19/2025 010 SANGER POLICE ASSOCIATION, DUES-POLICE
Source pay period: 1
1/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:polassnpay poldue 101 1,896.70 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 208 596.04 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 261 77.33 ID: 1,159 Check Total: 2,570.07
12/19/2025 012 EXECUTIVE MGMT ORGANIZATION, EXE MGMT
-DU
Source pay period: 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:sanexepay exdues 101 60.00 ID: 1,159 11/15/2025 to 11/28/2025 Cycle 26 sanexepay exdues 712 40.00 ID: 1,159 Check Total: 100.00
4,518.96Organization Total:
Page: 7
18 12/04/2025 City of Sanger 9:38AM
1 1/15/2025 to 11/28/2025- T
ype 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 8
4,518.96Pay Period Total (1 1/29/25 to 12/12/25 ID: 1,160):
4,518.96 Benefit Checks Grand Total :
Page: 8
19 12/17/2025 City of Sanger10:26AM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 1
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68586 12/19/2025 0.00 2,828.92CHAMPION,
AMANDA
68587 12/19/2025 0.00 2,412.25DELGADO, SIERRA
68588 12/19/2025 0.00 2,259.72JACKSON, BRIONNE
68589 12/19/2025 0.00 1,937.45MARTINEZ, LINA
68590 12/19/2025 0.00 5,519.45OLSON, NATHAN
68591 12/19/2025 0.00 303.33GONZALEZ, FRANK G
68592 12/19/2025 0.00 312.56MARTINEZ, DANIEL
68593 12/19/2025 0.00 312.56MELENDEZ, DOLORES
68594 12/19/2025 0.00 312.56MONTELONGO, MICHAEL A
68595 12/19/2025 0.00 1,609.26BARRAGAN, CASIMIRO
68596 12/19/2025 0.00 1,757.70CUEVAS, ERIC
68597 12/19/2025 0.00 3,285.38GOGGINS, JOSHUA
68598 12/19/2025 0.00 1,780.60MURPHY, ROSE
68599 12/19/2025 0.00 2,147.03SANDOVAL, PAUL
68600 12/19/2025 0.00 2,119.55TOVAR, CARLOS
68601 12/19/2025 0.00 580.19VIDRIO, JAVIER
68602 12/19/2025 0.00 3,323.77CAMARENA, KARLA D.
68603 12/19/2025 0.00 1,853.26CASILLAS-TORRES, SMALYNNE 68604 12/19/2025 0.00 1,286.34DE ORTA, MICHELLE
68605 12/19/2025 0.00 1,700.41FLORIAN, STEPHANIE
68606 12/19/2025 0.00 3,310.73HARMON, VIRGINIA
68607 12/19/2025 0.00 829.44NORIEGA, LESLIE
68608 12/19/2025 0.00 1,699.87PEREZ ZUNIGA, MAYRA E
68609 12/19/2025 0.00 1,387.70RAMIREZ, MICHELE
68610 12/19/2025 0.00 2,864.22WAHL, LEICA KATHRINA LACAY 68611 12/19/2025 0.00 1,495.02ALDAZ, MARCO
68612 12/19/2025 0.00 2,004.44ALONSO, JULIA
68613 12/19/2025 0.00 2,013.48CASTELLANOS, LINDSAY
68614 12/19/2025 0.00 5,110.87CORONADO JR, JESUS
68615 12/19/2025 0.00 1,842.57CUELLAR, ADRIANA
68616 12/19/2025 0.00 1,683.17DELGADILLO, ANGEL
68617 12/19/2025 0.00 1,817.32DOLAN, HAYDEN
68618 12/19/2025 0.00 2,525.91ELLIS, SKYLER
68619 12/19/2025 0.00 1,296.07ESCOBAR, MICHAEL
68620 12/19/2025 0.00 2,215.04HOULE, BAILEY
68621 12/19/2025 0.00 1,437.83JACKSON, COLBY
68622 12/19/2025 0.00 1,707.64JAECKEL, AVA
68623 12/19/2025 0.00 2,944.81JONES, ANDY
Page: 1
20 12/17/2025 City of Sanger10:26AM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 2
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68624 12/19/2025 0.00 1,951.05LANG, JUSTIN
68625 12/19/2025 0.00 2,944.73LORENTE, R
YAN
68626 12/19/2025 0.00 1,704.04MCWILLIAMS, SOFIA
68627 12/19/2025 0.00 2,866.94PALLAS, MICHAEL L
68628 12/19/2025 0.00 2,316.70PISCHING, MARK G
68629 12/19/2025 0.00 2,819.26PITTS, CRAIG
68630 12/19/2025 0.00 2,004.68SALAZAR, GARRETT
68631 12/19/2025 0.00 2,519.75SANDERS, GERALD
68632 12/19/2025 0.00 955.91SPANGLE, JENNIFER
68633 12/19/2025 0.00 3,377.67TARASCOU, GREGORY
68634 12/19/2025 0.00 2,170.46TREVINO, SANDRA
68635 12/19/2025 0.00 1,772.76VELASQUEZ, SHERRY
68636 12/19/2025 0.00 3,300.72WADDLE, CHRISTOPHER A.
68637 12/19/2025 0.00 1,468.70WASHBURN, HAIDYN
68638 12/19/2025 0.00 2,741.48WILLIAMS, KENNETH D.
68639 12/19/2025 0.00 3,592.63WILSON, TODD
68640 12/19/2025 0.00 2,059.76ZEPEDA, LEONARDO
68641 12/19/2025 0.00 6,519.53ACEVES CRUZ, JULIAN
68642 12/19/2025 0.00 4,095.07ARGUELLO, SERGIO
68643 12/19/2025 0.00 12,781.60BANDA-TOVAR, JOEL
68644 12/19/2025 0.00 6,613.38BARRAGAN, MELISSA
68645 12/19/2025 0.00 3,227.08BISE, JEFFREY L.
68646 12/19/2025 0.00 3,485.98BOUST, JASON
68647 12/19/2025 0.00 1,232.65CAMPBELL, SARAH L
68648 12/19/2025 0.00 3,728.08CASTREJON, EDDIE
68649 12/19/2025 0.00 2,583.25DIAZ, HENRY
68650 12/19/2025 0.00 3,149.64EDWARDS, SHAELA
68651 12/19/2025 0.00 2,057.00FRANCO, RICHARD
68652 12/19/2025 0.00 2,483.75GARCIA, FERNANDO
68653 12/19/2025 0.00 3,982.05GARZA, RAMIRO
68654 12/19/2025 0.00 2,142.88GUILLEN, ROSARIO
68655 12/19/2025 0.00 1,552.13HERNANDEZ, ANDREINA
68656 12/19/2025 0.00 1,868.67HUGHES, TOBIAS
68657 12/19/2025 0.00 9,294.28INOSTROS, JESSICA
68658 12/19/2025 0.00 3,713.63JOHNSON, JOSHUA D
68659 12/19/2025 0.00 1,980.35JONES, KIMBERLY M.
68660 12/19/2025 0.00 1,823.38KAUR, MANDEEP
68661 12/19/2025 0.00 11,018.18MEDINA, JOSE
Page: 2
21 12/17/2025 City of Sanger10:26AM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 3
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68662 12/19/2025 0.00 2,125.52MENDEZ, GERARD
68663 12/19/2025 0.00 5,905.1
1MORALES, JESSE
68664 12/19/2025 0.00 4,174.12MORENO, LOUIS A
68665 12/19/2025 0.00 2,799.30MUNOZ, BERTHA J
68666 12/19/2025 0.00 2,101.81NELSON, AMANDA M
68667 12/19/2025 0.00 8,304.57PACHECO, JOSE
68668 12/19/2025 0.00 3,213.66REYNOLDS, JOHN
68669 12/19/2025 0.00 7,184.53ROARK, TYLER
68670 12/19/2025 0.00 2,670.53RODRIGUEZ, JULIAN R
68671 12/19/2025 0.00 1,788.22RYAN, NICOLE
68672 12/19/2025 0.00 3,352.39SANCHEZ, KELSEY
68673 12/19/2025 0.00 2,510.99SOTO, JOSE O.
68674 12/19/2025 0.00 2,005.85THAO, MENOU A
68675 12/19/2025 0.00 4,757.46TORRES, ROBERT C
68676 12/19/2025 0.00 2,663.19TREVINO, CYNTHIA
68677 12/19/2025 0.00 1,157.28VARELA, TERRI
68678 12/19/2025 0.00 1,322.44WELCH, PAUL M.
68679 12/19/2025 0.00 8,146.46YAMBUPAH, ANGELA C
68680 12/19/2025 0.00 2,726.47ACOSTA, JAVIER
68681 12/19/2025 0.00 1,465.51AVALOS, JORGE
68682 12/19/2025 0.00 2,268.99BARBA CORTES, ERIKA
68683 12/19/2025 0.00 1,302.40CABRERA, MARTIN
68684 12/19/2025 0.00 1,949.64CHOLICO, EDGAR
68685 12/19/2025 0.00 1,717.19EGGLESTON, STEVEN
68686 12/19/2025 0.00 2,321.93FLUETSCH, JOHN
68687 12/19/2025 0.00 2,903.91GONZALEZ, EDDIE
68688 12/19/2025 0.00 1,719.39GONZALEZ, JUAN
68689 12/19/2025 0.00 1,676.82HUERTA, PAUL
68690 12/19/2025 0.00 1,468.13IRAZOQUI, DANIEL T
68691 12/19/2025 0.00 3,342.96JASSO, GEORGE
68692 12/19/2025 0.00 2,176.06LOPEZ, ALEX
68693 12/19/2025 0.00 2,115.97LOPEZ, DIEGO
68694 12/19/2025 0.00 2,040.96MARTIN, RAYMOND
68695 12/19/2025 0.00 1,643.75MAZARIEGO, MANUEL
68696 12/19/2025 0.00 1,509.09ORONA, CATARINO
68697 12/19/2025 0.00 1,270.55PIMENTEL, SEAN
68698 12/19/2025 0.00 2,556.55REYES, ANTONIO P
68699 12/19/2025 0.00 3,672.69ROSALES, ESPERANZA
Page: 3
22 12/17/2025 City of Sanger10:26AM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 4
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68700 12/19/2025 0.00 1,764.75SANT
OS, WILLIAM
68701 12/19/2025 0.00 2,062.63WOODS, STEVE
68702 12/19/2025 0.00 731.51HERNANDEZ, KEITH
68703 12/19/2025 0.00 865.42MENDOZA, GRICELDA
68704 12/19/2025 0.00 1,734.53ALBARRAN-PEREZ, VIANEY
68705 12/19/2025 0.00 244.49BARAJAS, LIZETTE
68706 12/19/2025 0.00 611.03DENISTON, CATALINA
68707 12/19/2025 0.00 165.81PETRILLE, BRIANA
68708 12/19/2025 0.00 30.93PINA, CARLOS
68709 12/19/2025 0.00 1,247.57VASQUEZ, APRIL
68710 12/19/2025 0.00 2,136.11ZAMORA, JOAQUIN
0.00 325,355.39Employee Check T otals
0.00 325,355.39Bank dirdep T otals (125 Forms)
Page: 4
23 12/17/2025 City of Sanger10:26AM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 5
Bank: pybank - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60714 12/19/2025 266.00 0.00HUR
TADO, ESMERALDA
60715 12/19/2025 1,731.50 0.00IRAZOQUI, MARIO
60716 12/19/2025 1,657.92 0.00LITTLE, LYNDSEE
60717 12/19/2025 3,586.83 0.00AYALA, RAMIRO
60718 12/19/2025 1,849.57 0.00AYERS III, JOHN
60719 12/19/2025 1,631.89 0.00BERNAL, SADIE
60720 12/19/2025 2,048.21 0.00BURKDOLL, MARISA
60721 12/19/2025 2,717.39 0.00PEREZ, SILVESTRE
60722 12/19/2025 1,623.63 0.00REYES, ALEJANDRO
60723 12/19/2025 38.09 0.00CASTRO ROSALES, NANCY
60724 12/19/2025 297.13 0.00PRADO, BRANDON
17,448.16 0.00Employee Check T otals
Bank: pybank - WEST AMERICA BANK
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60725 12/19/2025 026 98.86 0.00AFLAC
60726 12/19/2025 057 2,664.40 0.00AMERICAN FIDELITY
ASSURANCE
60727 12/19/2025 012 220.00 0.00EXECUTIVE MGMT ORGANIZATION, E 60728 12/19/2025 041 20.00 0.00GENERAL EMPLOYEES ASSN, DUES G 60729 12/19/2025 030 390.00 0.00MID-MANAGEMENT ASSN, DUES-MM 60730 12/19/2025 008 2,699.24 0.00SANGER FIRE ASSOCIATION, DUES- 60731 12/19/2025 052 954.50 0.00SANGER FIRE ASSOCIATION, FOOD 60732 12/19/2025 010 5,140.14 0.00SANGER POLICE ASSOCIATION, DUE 60733 12/19/2025 045 1,151.52 0.00STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 60734 12/19/2025 007 410.41 0.00STATIONARY ENGINEERS, LOCAL 39 60735 12/19/2025 059 1,263.54 0.00TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 15,012.61Total 0.00
15,012.61 0.00 Payee T otals
32,460.77 0.00Bank pybank T otals (22 Forms)
Page: 5
24 12/17/2025 City of Sanger10:26AM
1 1/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- Type 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 6
Bank: wire - FEDERA L TAX PAYMENT
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
2174 12/19/2025 003
111,140.66 0.00WESTAMERICA BANK
2175 12/19/2025 004 18,955.46 0.00EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 2176 12/19/2025 006 1,451.82 0.00I.C.M.A RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2177 12/19/2025 054 3,771.85 0.00CALPERS 457 PLAN
135,319.79T otal 0.00
135,319.79 0.00 Payee Totals
135,319.79 0.00Bank wire Totals (4 Forms)
Grand Total 167,780.56 325,355.39
493,135.95Next Step:
Account Posting (AP)
Pay Period is Open (Locked)
Totals Checks and Direct Deposit (151 Forms)
Page: 6
25 12/17/2025 City of Sanger10:26AM
1 1/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- Type 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 7
Source pay period: Doc source: Bended code: Fund:
No Pending Benefit Checks
Check
Total:
Page: 7
26 12/18/2025 City of Sanger 9:1 1AM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- Type S Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 1
Bank: pybank - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60736 12/19/2025 147.09 0.00CABRERA, MAR
TIN
60737 12/19/2025 4,163.87 0.00EGGLESTON, STEVEN
60738 12/19/2025 227.29 0.00LOPEZ, ALEX
60739 12/19/2025 1,719.74 0.00REYES, ANTONIO P
60740 12/19/2025 202.04 0.00SANTOS, WILLIAM
6,460.03 0.00Employee Check T otals
6,460.03 0.00Bank pybank T otals (5 Forms)
Page: 1
27 12/18/2025 City of Sanger 9: 11AM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- Type S Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 2
Bank: wire - FEDERA L TAX PAYMENT
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
2178 12/19/2025 003 2,567.04 0.00WES
TAMERICA BANK
2179 12/19/2025 004 495.12 0.00EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 3,062.16T otal 0.00
3,062.16 0.00 Payee Totals
3,062.16 0.00Bank wire Totals (2 Forms)
Grand Total 9,522.19 0.00
9,522.19Next Step:
Account Posting (AP)
Pay Period is Open (Locked)
Totals Checks and Direct Deposit (7 Forms)
Page: 2
28 12/18/2025 City of Sanger 9: 11AM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- Type S Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 3
Source pay period: Doc source: Bended code: Fund:
No Pending Benefit Checks
Check
Total:
Page: 3
29 12/22/2025 City of Sanger 2:20PM
11/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- T
ype S Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 1
Bank: pybank - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60741 12/22/2025 1,330.63 0.00AYERS III, JOHN
60742
12/22/2025 1,283.65 0.00BERNAL, SADIE
60743 12/22/2025 1,253.70 0.00BURKDOLL, MARISA
3,867.98 0.00Employee Check T otals
3,867.98 0.00Bank pybank T otals (3 Forms)
Page: 1
30 12/22/2025 City of Sanger 2:20PM
1 1/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- Type S Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 2
Bank: wire - FEDERA L TAX PAYMENT
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
2180 12/22/2025 003 916.37 0.00WES
TAMERICA BANK
2181 12/22/2025 004 59.90 0.00EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 976.27T otal 0.00
976.27 0.00 Payee Totals
976.27 0.00Bank wire Totals (2 Forms)
Grand Total 4,844.25 0.00
4,844.25Next Step:
Account Posting (AP)
Pay Period is Open (Locked)
Totals Checks and Direct Deposit (5 Forms)
Page: 2
31 12/22/2025 City of Sanger 2:20PM
1 1/29/2025 to 12/12/2025- Type S Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 3
Source pay period: Doc source: Bended code: Fund:
No Pending Benefit Checks
Check
Total:
Page: 3
32 Prepared by: Lina Martinez Approved by: _Nathan Olson_____________________
REVIEW: City Manager: _NCO_____ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION __X_ Consent
__X_ Info Item
____ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency
____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2026
Agenda Item No.: G-3
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karla Camarena, Finance Manager
Subject: Warrants- December 2025
RECOMMENDATION:
Warrants, including Check Nos. 96142 through 96330, for the month of December 2025.
33 apGhklst
12l0gl2025 11:17:13AM
waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Date Vendor
Page:1
Amount Paid Check Totallnvoice
MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 525111162
SANGER WOMEN'S CLUE FEE
STANCRAFT TROPHIES 8 3168
TRUSAIC ctNV-043974
lnv Date Description
DEC-EMP BANQUET
DEPOSIT & RENTAL 12.10-20'
PLAQUES (EMP BANQUET)
ACAANNUAL FEE -FY26
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
Bank
Check #
96142
96143
96144
96145
12t8t2025
Voucher:
12t812025
Voucher:
12t8t2025
Voucher:
12t8t2025
Voucher:
00596
06584
09858
12343
2,800,76
500.00
392.50
15,203.24
2,800.76
500.00
392.50
15,203.24
18,896.50
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
11t6t2025
Sub total for WESTAMERICA BANK:
Page: 1
34 apGhkLst
1210912025 {1:17:13AM
4 checks in this report.
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page: 2
Grand Total All Ghecks: 18,896.50
Page:2
35 apChkLst
1211212025 1O:21:424M
Bank
Gheck #
96'146 12t1212025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
96147
96148
96149
961 50
961 51
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
Page:1
Amount Paid Check Total
waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Date Vendor lnvoice
ACTION TOWING DIVE TE 57330
57236
ADVENTIST HEALTH TOX 2647
lnv Date Descriotion
11t28t2025 E120 TOW 11t28t25
12t2t2025 E-120 TOW TO CUMMTNS
111312025 DRUG/ALCOHOL TESTING
11 t 1 8t2025 OXYGEN (M EDTCAL)
11 I 11 12025 OXYGEN (MEDICAL)
11t20t2025 ALARM MONTTOR (PD)
09470
11604
10494
10738
00025
AIRGAS USA LLC
ALARMWATCH
ALERT-O-LITE, INC
ALESHIRE & WYNDER LL
ALL VALLEY SPRAY SERV
ALTA LANGUAGE SRVS II
AMERITAS
9166900854
9166692065
748959
900.00
900.00
1,080.00
337.50
224.95
35.00 705.86
304.1 9
150.33
129.86
4,086.50
1,566.50
1,534.00
1,298.00
914.50
206.50
177.00
59.00 1,475.00
1,406.25
500.00
450.00
127.00
2,176.33
893.20
681.60
485.00
1,800.00
1,080.00
562.45
35.00 1,290.24
9,842.00
3,831.25
127.00
4,236.13
96152
961 53
961 54
0187821-tN
0187822-tN
088358-tN
0187820-tN
1 00926
100927
1 00929
1 00928
1 00931
1 00930
100932
100933
378202
278197
378203
278198
ts808607
301 379
301 379
301 379
301 379
11t20t2025
11t20t2025
121412025
11t20t2025
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
12t4t2025
11t22t2025
11t11t2025
11t23t2025
11t11t2025
9t30t2025
12t12t2025 12927
Voucher:
12t12t2025 04173
Voucher:
12t12t202510507
Voucher:
12t12t2025 07024
Voucher:
CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS
CHRISTMAS TREE DECOR
CHRISTMAS PARK DECORAT
CHAIN MAINT
GENERAL
PERSONNEL
PW
PLANNING
POLICE
FINANCE
WATER - UB
WASTEWATER
SVCS/ WEED ABATEMENT
WEED ABATEMENT; WELLS
SVCS/ WEED ABATEMENT
WEED ABATEMENT; WELLS
BILINGUAL EXAMS
11t2412025 EE DENTAL tNS 11/21i25
11t17t2025 EE DENTAL tNS 11t14t25
121112025 ADMIN FEES - DEC
11t28t2025 EE DENTAL tNS 11128/25
{hrt
Page:1
36 apChklst
1211212025 10=21:424M
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Gheck # Date Vendor
961 55 12t12t2025 04701
Voucher:
APACHE SMOG INC
BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU
BLUETRITON BRANDS IN
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page:2
Amount Paid Check Totallnv Date Descriotion
REPAIRSAND SMOG
OIL CHANGE VEHICLE 105
OIL CHANGE VEHIC 103
SMOG G5 F35O
VEHIC MAINT/ 23 FORD F150
CELL PHN CHRGS -PD#2872
(Continued)
lnvoice
961 56
96157
961 58
96159
96160
96161
96162
96163
96164
96165
96166
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
07501
07501
11225
12958
12877
10t31t2025
10t3112025
12t6t2025
11t6t2025
12t6t2025
11t6t2025
12t6t2025
11t20t2025
11t2012025
11t2412025
11t19t2025
11t20t2025
11t19t2025
11t5t2025
AT&T MOBILITY
AT&T MOBILIry 831514171 11t2712025 CELL PHN CHRGS #83151417 AXON ENTERPRISES, IN( INUS339831 411612025 BODY MOUNT/ BALLISTIC VE 056343
056383
056372
056385
056431
287286160185
11t1312025
11t24t2025
1112012025
11t24t2025
12t5t2025
11t8t2025
430.1 9
114.81
114.81
100.00
92.41 4,030.03
647.62
332.70
3,355.00
165.00
301.05
221.28
179.29
160.63
81.47 73.88
750.00
250.00
170.00
90.00 84.40
450.00
353.78
50.97 1,090.93
852.22
4,030.03
647.62
332.70
3,520.00
1,017.60
1,344.44
450.00
353.78
50.97 1,090.93
371.00
12t12t2025 00097
Voucher:
28527
28457
0518730166359
05K8730276838
0518730276838
05K8730166359
05L8730276837
05K8730001059
At30141
Ar30459
At30076
At30143
4t30068
REGIST
OCT STREET LIGHT/ SIGNAL
PM STREET LIGHT/ SIGNAL t\
BOTTLED WATER (SENIOR C
BOTTLED WATER (REC)
BOTTLED WATER (REC)
BOTTLED WATER (SENIOR C
BOTTLED WATER (FI NANCE)
BOTTLED WATER (PD)
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
REGIST/ K. JONES/5/181202612t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t1212025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
10243
12955
1 3001
09934
02464
BSK & ASSOCIATES INC
CAPE
CAREFUSTON SOLUT|ONI 1 002641 543-0
CASTELLANOS, LINDSAY REIMB
CENCALAUTO&TRUCKI NOV
CENTRAL VALLEY TOXIC( 343388
11 I 1OI2O25 MEDICATION DISPENSER
12t4t2025 GYM (AUG-OCT)
11 I3OI2O25 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
1OI1I2O25 DRUG SCREEN 371.00
Page:2
37 apchkLst
1211212025 1O:21:424M
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
(Continued)
lnvoice lnv Date Descriotion
CHEVROLET BUICK GMC CVCS197098 911212025 VEHIC MAINT-REC TRUCK COLANTUONO, HIGHSMIl 67767 111512025 FY23 LEGALAUDIT LETTER Page: 3
Amount Paid Check Total
220.00 220.00
123.50 123.50
96167
96168
96169
96170
96171
96172
961 73
96174
961 75
96176
96177
96178
961 79
96180
12t12t2025 00922
Voucher:
12t12t2025 11630
Voucher:
12t12t2025 09872
Voucher:
12t12t2025 08477
Voucher:
12t121202513000
Voucher:
12t12t2025 02714
Voucher:
coMcAST 256348126
254542179
COMCASTCABLE 215187
230483
234428
5646
COMMERCIAL CHRISTMA 25-11 SOCCS
cooKs coMMUNtcATtot 162037
162038
162556
162071
162407
162598
CoRELOGTC SOLUTTONS 30814630
CPOA 453990
CRISCOM COMPANY, THl 27 1625
CSG CONSULTANTS INC. 63210
CUMMINS SALESAND SE 4-250525946
07-251137509
4-250526382
DEKRA LITE ARINVO274O3
ETHERNET SRVS (501 ACAD)
ETHERNET SRV (DSPCH) #9€
I NTERNET SRV.FI NANCE #81
TNTERNET CAM (501 ACAD) #
INTERNET SRV-PD #81 55500
CABLE SRV-PD #81 55500160(
WALK.THROUGH ORNAMEN-
11115t2025
11t1t2025
11t19t2025
11t3t2025
11t7t2025
11t8t2025
10t6t2025
770.60
751.02
300.79
269.93
257.98
28.64 8,517.93
4,835.02
4,455.80
2,817.28
2,111.12
545.72
165.00
428.64
6,198.54
785.00
708.44
2,640.95
128.50
1,521.62
857.34
8,s17.93
14,929.94
428.64
135.00
7,000.00
3,213.75
7,691.98
2,640.95
128.50
721.00
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
05241
09071
11262
11727
02324
912512025 VEHICLE UPFITTING
912512025 VEHICLE UPFITTING
11t21t2025 4359 ADT REWTRE
912912025 VEHIC REPAIR
1113012025 BEAR MTN REPEATER
11 12512025 VEH I C TROU BLESHOOT
1 OI31 12025 REALQU EST SERVICES
5t15t2025 T126 RADTATOR
11 11312025 INSITE SOFTWARE SUBSCIP
5123t2025 E120 MATNT
1111712025 LIGHTS FOR BREHLER SQUF
11t7t2024 TRNG EVENT 12.11.24 (BOUS 135.00
1111712025 GRANT WRITING SVCS FOR 7,000.00
111912025 BUILDING SERVICES 3,213.75
12t1212025 06117
Voucher:
12t12t2025 02798
Voucher:
12t12t2025 00245
Voucher:
DELRAY T|RE & RETREAT 500163644 10t28t2025 TTRES (pD)
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC 002614 11t4t2025 L|VE SCANS 721.OO Page: 3
38 apChkLst
1211212025 10:21:42AM
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
111112025 DISPATCHING SERVICES FY :
11 I 1 412025 PRISON ER PROCESSI NG
11t17t2025 PROXY BOOKING - 11101124-1
1111812025 BULK CO2- SWIMMING POOL
9t30t2025 POOL PH CTRL
11 I3I2O25 356 CEL DIAG/REPAIR/SUPPL
121512025 357 PREVENTATIVE MAINT
12131 12025 TELEPHONE SRV
1113012025 EE DISABILITY / LIFE INSURA
1013112025 EE DISABILITY / LIFE INSURA
1112512025 SAFE REPAIR
111512025 '27 BMW REPAIRS
111512025 BAR-HARNESS
11t13t2025 2020 BMW REPAIRS
111412025 HOLIDAY BANNERS
Page: 4
Amount Paid Check Total
7,350.06
1,665.20
2,515.00
1,420.59
39.00 1,533.50
39,271"93
2,528.40
283.56
285.66
32.32 1,855.57
1,406.30
s,381.74
42,083.89
317.98
3,261.87
5,381.74
2,323.67
2,847.21
2,323.67
2,847.21
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
FRESNO COUNTY SHERIL SO23168
s023201
so23213
FRESNO OXYGEN, INC. 0063673810
0091722474
FRESNO TRUCK CENTEF R001229097:01
R001229819:01
FRONTIER DEC
HARTFORD-PRIORITY AC 8691 69
869169
HAVEN'S SECURITY INC 1029236618
HERWALDT MOTORSPOF 36346
4178159
36581
HIGASSON COMPANY 11042025
961 81
961 82
961 83
961 84
961 85
961 86
961 87
961 88
961 89
961 90
96191
96192
961 93
961 94
961 95
12t1212025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t1212025
Voucher:
12t1212025
Voucher:
12t1212025
Voucher.
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
3,730.65
3,630.52
481.81
2,134.00
36.91 3,819.58
6,450.00
7 ,361.17
481.81
5,990.49
6,4s0.00
12t12t2025 03885
Voucher:
12t1212025 11324
Voucher:
12t12t2025 09316
Voucher:
12t12t2025 08816
Voucher:
12t12t2025 03699
Voucher:
12t12t2025 00318
Voucher:
12t12t2025 04867
Voucher:
00331
07174
1 0345
0041 9
02290
08753
00382
06572
lnv Date Description
ELECTRTC MOTOR SHOP 203373 1112012025 R&M/ REBUILD IND MCC BUC 7,350.06 ENTERPRTSE FM TRUST 110525 111512025 CAR RENTL (J. JOHNSON) #6 1,665.20 ENVTRONMENT CONTRO 11605-299 10t3112025 FLOOR CLEANING (PD) 2,515.00 FOREMOST PROMOTION 741285 912312025 CRIME PREV SUPPLIES 1,420.59 FRANCO, RICHARD REIMB 121112025 IPHONE CASE 39.00
FRESNO COUNTY DEPT ( P-6069 1111812025 DISPATCHING SERVICES - N( 1,533.50 GRAINGER, INC e719940729 11t20t2025WWTP/PSIGAUGES
HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO INV2112O 10131 12025 VACTOR REPAIR
12t12t2025 12995
Voucher:
961 96
Page: 4
39 apchkLst
1211212025 10:21=424M
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
Page: 5
Amount Paid Check Total
Bank : waap WESTAMERIGA BANK
Gheck # Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
HOFFMAN SECURITY 749121
748725
REIMBHOULE, BAILEY
INTOXIMETERS INC. BOO748
KINGS INDUSTRIAL OCC 315730
KINGS WATER ALLIANCE 426
425
KOEFRAN 0000685724
LES SCHWAB TIRES 56400423636
56400423835
LEX|S NEXTS COPLOGIC | 1030003040
LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITI\ 309158
306384
306382
306381
3091 57
306383
306385
LIFEASSIST, INC. 2025607
2021015
2023020
2023054
LIGHTHOUSE ELECTRICI SD21 5
961 97
961 98
961 99
96200
96201
96202
96203
96204
96205
96206
96207
96208
96209
12t12t202510739
Voucher:
12t1212025 12424
Voucher:
12t12t2025 03103
Voucher:
12t1212025 11757
Voucher:
12t12t2025 11997
Voucher:
1211212025 11627
Voucher:
12t12t2025 02223
Voucher:
12t12t2025 06438
Voucher:
12t12t202510019
Voucher:
1211212025 12029
Voucher:
12t12t2025 00533
Voucher:
LANGUAGE LINE SERVIC 11766487 1013112025 TRANSLATION SRV LAW & ASSOCIATES INVE 25.199 1112012025 FIRE BACKGROUND INV lnv Date Descriotion
11 I 17 12025 ALARM REPAIR
1 1 I2QI2O25 SEC U RITY SERVICES
121212025 INSTRUCTOR ONE CERTAPF
111412025 DRYGAS/ DRYGAS CYLINDEF
111512025 PRE.EMP PHYSICALS
912312025 ADMIN FEES & MBRS DUES F
912312025 ADMIN FEES & MBRS DUES F
10t31 t2025 ACO FREEZERS
1012712025 NEW TIRES-'17 TAHOE
1012912025 FRONT TIRE REPLACEMENT
1013112025 ONLINE REPORTING SYST
489.53
65.00 100.00
337.30
2,325.56
17,465.00
5,946.00
350.00
10.44 1,600.00
1,440.15
382.05
988.80
7,380.00
6,120.00
405.00
315.00
270.00
120.00
90.00 2,486.87
2,029.79
1,615.86
127.50
890.00
554.53
100.00
337.30
2,325.56
23,411.00
350.00
10.44 1,600.00
1,822.20
988.80
14,700.00
6,260.02
890.00
12t12t2025 00534
Voucher:
12t12t2025 12706
Voucher:
12t1212025 02614
Voucher:
10t31t2025
9t30t2025
9t30t2025
9t30t2025
10t31t2025
9t30t2025
9t30t2025
12t2t2025
11t21t2025
11t25t2025
11t26t2025
11112t2025
NEGOTIATIONS - OCT
NEGOTIATIONS - SEPT
LEGAL SERVICES - SEPT
LEGAL SERVICES - SEPT
LEGAL SERVICES - OCT
LEGAL SERVICES - SEPT
LEGAL SERVICES - SEPT
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
EMS SUPPLIES
MIDAZOLAM
R&M/ PEPS ROUGHING FILTE
8,983.4996210 LOZANO SMITH 2261926 1111212025 PROF LEGAL SRVS - OCT 8,983.49 Page: 5
40 apChklst
1211212025 10=21:.424M
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
METRO UNIFORM & ACCI 301965
MID VALLEY DISPOSAL 6-4613470
6-4613367
6-461 3685
10312025MIGHTY MART INC.
MI NERAL KI NG PUBLISHII 720226
720227
720233
MISSION LINEN SUPPLY NOV
MOLINA, ARIEL 002
MOORE TWINING ASSOC 2512004
2512095
251 1 800
2512005
251797
MUNISERVICES LLC INVO6-022068
MUNOZ, BERTHA
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIO
OFFICE DEPOT
O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
PACE SUPPLY CORP
REIMB
Page: 6
Amount Paid Check Total
1,129.75
Inv Date Description
10t15t2025 COMPOST MULCH S81383 Pf
1011512025 COMPOST MULCH SB1383PF
10t15t2025 COMPOST MULCH S81383 Pf
10t3112025 FUEL - PD
11 t6t2025 0RDtNANCE NO.2025-07
11 t6t2025 oRDTNANCE NO. 2025-08
1013112025 DISPLAYAD - JOB FAIR
1113012025 NOV - PW UNIFORM/ LINEN S
1111012025 DECOR - MILITARY BANNER
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
96211
96212
96213
96214
96215
96216
96217
96218
96219
96220
96221
96222
12t1212025 06571
Voucher:
12t12t2025 09920
Voucher.
12t12t2025 06909
Voucher:
12t12t2025 00811
Voucher:
12t12t2025 00596
Voucher:
12t12t2025 12963
Voucher:
12t12t2025 08962
Voucher:
12t12t2025 04045
Voucher:
12t12t2025 12164
Voucher:
12t12t2025 11735
Voucher:
12t12t2025 03356
Voucher:
12t12t2025 08739
Voucher:
12t12t2025 11930
Voucher:
11t28t2025 UNtF SUPPL|ES (G. MENDEZ) 1,129.75
6,773.50
638.67
471.04
183.00
450.00
405.00
240.00
1 ,639.10
280.00
696.00
431.00
202.00
190.00
43.00 2,816.63
30.00 406.30
200.00
200.00
201.75
92.42 81.49
22.48 111.76
82.61 82.04
62.43 7,883.21
183.00
280.00
1,562.00
2,816.63
30.00 806.30
398.14
194.37
144.47
1 1
,095
,639
.00
.10
11t25t2025
11t26t2025
11t19t2025
11t25t2025
11t19t2025
11t14t2025
WWTP/ PERMIT SAMPLING
I NDUSTRYS/ PERMIT SAMPLI
I NDUSTRYS/ PERMIT SAMPLI
WWTP/ PERMIT SAMPLING
WWTP/ PERMIT SAMPLING
SUTA CAQ22A25
11045485
41039663
A1039335
446048055001
446048210001
445340335001
446048211001
2774^230398
2774-227347
1 91 0924865-1
1910924865-2
11t11t2025
11t14t2025
10t9t2025
11t3t2025
10t31t2025
11t14t2025
10t31t2025
11t1312025
10t27t2025
11t17t2025
11t20t2025
11t25t2025 GYM (NOV)
COBRACOVERAGE - NOV'2€
HRA/MERP - NOV'25
HRA/MERP - OCT'25
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES - MILITARY BANNE
SUPPLIES
PARTS-201 4 FORD EXPLORE
WIPER BLADES 2O2O FORD E
HYDRANT BREAKAWAY BOT
HYDRANT GASKET
96223
Page.6
41 apChklst
1211212025 10:21:424M
Bank: waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
PMSI 279120
PRICE PAIGE & COMPAN\ 36912C
PROFESSIONAL PRINT & 127893
126071
REYES, ROSA NOV
SANCHEZAUTO REPAIR . 13134
12963
1592
SANGER CHAMBER OF C 6212
SEQUOIA COUNCIL 1 531
SEQUOIAS COMMUNITY I 767
763
SILVA'S OIL COMPANY IN( 478526
SOUTH CO VETERINARY DGT-3223
DGT-3204
DGT-3302
SPECIALIZED UTILITY SE 3140
STATE WATER RESOURC WD-0308206
wD-o307789
wD-0307950
STEELE PRINTING B 1615
SUPERIOR POOL PRODU Q2033371
cR-Q2030353
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
1012212025 SNR CNTR HVAC REPAIRS 2,179.11
9I3OI2O25 ASSIST WITH ryLER TECH & 1,781.00
lnv Date Descriotion
121412025 UTILITY BILLING SRVS. NOV
71212025 UTILITY BILLING SRVS - JUNI
11 I3OI2O25 ZUM BA I NSTRUCTOR
10t27t2025'17 FORD pOLtCE VEHTC TOV
111812025 FORD F15O LOCKOUT SRVS
12t1t2025 SMOG CHECK P120
11 11312025 PROF SERVICES-DEC
1111012025 PERISHABLE SKILLS #3
11 I 1OI2O25 FIRST AID/CPR REGIST
11 I5I2O25 LOADERY GREENWASTE
11t26t2025 ACO SRV
1112512025 EUTHANASIA
121312025 EUTHANASIA
1013112025 OCT WATER SHUT OFF SRVS
11 I 1912025 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE, 7 11 125-
11 11912025 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE, 7 11 125-
11 I 1912025 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE, 7 I 1 125-
121312025 CITATION FORMS/ F1 FORM I
1112512025 BULK CHLORINE - WELL 16
11 12612025 DUPLICATE PAYMENT
Page: 7
Amount Paid Check Total
2,179.11
1,781.00
96224
96225
96226
96227
96228
96229
96230
96231
96232
96233
96234
96235
96236
96237
96238
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t1212025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t1212025
Voucher:
10475
12640
03989
1 0823
04766
12t12t2025 00433
Voucher:
12t12t2025 09368
Voucher:
12t12t2025 12060
Voucher:
12t12t2025 03709
Voucher:
12t12t2025 07309
Voucher:
12t12t2025 12636
Voucher:
12t12t2025 00967
Voucher:
12t12t2025 01354
Voucher:
12t12t2025 02931
Voucher:
12t12t2025 10973
Voucher:
1112012025 NEW/ RENEWAL- EXPLORER 1,805.00
1,292.25
1,271.25
459.90
295.00
120.00
39.75 6,666.67
1,440.00
270.00
952.86
166.00
166.00
166.00
1,235.00
46,915.00
46,915.00
3,945.00
356.62
758.87
1,255.88
-243.04
2,553.50
459.90
454.75
6,666.67
1,805.00
1,710.00
952.86
498.00
1,235.00
97,775.00
356.62
758.87
1,012.84
SUN AUTO TIRE & SERVI( 321107598 1112612025 TIRE REPLACEMENT - PD Page: 7
42 apChkLst
121 1212025 10:21 t42Aill
Bank
Gheck #
96239
96240
96241
96242
96243
96244
96245
96246
96247
96248
11t5t2025
11t5t2025
11t24t2025
8t21t2025
11t7t2025
10129t2025
11t7t2025
11t4t2025
12t2t2025
11t26t2025
11t18t2025
11t24t2025
11t24t2025
10t1t2025
11t6t2025
12t1t2025
12t1t2025
12t1t2025
12t1t2025
11t30t2025
Amount Paid
1,951.00
1,512.35
869.93
488.82
464.51
239.69
235.25
94.10 3,847.67
2,427.93
1,926.74
Page: 8
Check Total
12,131.25
1,926.74
230.00
60,308.38
10,451.33
259.99
180.00
266.07
1,503.21
419.60
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
waap WESTAMERIGA BANK
Date Vendor
12t12t2025 08757
Voucher:
12t12t2025 12252
Voucher:
12t12t2025 12021
Voucher:
12t12t2025 04091
Voucher:
12t12t2025 08821
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t1212025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
10448
11840
08709
01 086
04798
12t12t2025 04321
Voucher:
(Continued)
lnvoice
SWANSON FAHRNEY FOf 255848
255847
2561 93
254435
255939
255767
255935
255731
256073
256227
TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS 129540
T-MOBILE USA INC L2511240456
L2511240273
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES ll 045-539863a
045-543798
UNITY lT 111836
111887
111838
111837
UNWIRED BROADBAND II 02547917
VALLEY SHREDDING 214433
214420
VERIZON WIRELESS 6128444089
VIDEO INSPECTION SER\ 9952
VSP DEC
DEC
DEC
VULCAN MATERIALS CO 5072477
lnv Date Description
VEHIC MAINT'19 FORD EXPL
VEHIC MAINT'17 FORD EXPL
VEHIC MAINT'14 FORD EXPL
VEHIC MAINT'16 FORD EXPL
VEHIC MAINT UNIT#S124
VEHIC MAINT'21 EXPLORER
VEHIC MAINT UNIT#S123
VEHIC MAINT'25 FORD EXPL
VEHIC MAINT'22 FORD EXPL
VEHIC MAINT'14 FORD EXPL
WELLS 25,14, STORAGE TAN
GPS LOCATE
GPS LOCATE
TYLER TECHONOLOGIES : El
TYLER TECHONOLOGIES : El
IT SRVS - NOV
IT SRV - PD
oFFtcE 365 - NOV
FIREWALL - NOV
BROADBAND YRD (DEC 25)
115.00
115.00
58,208.38
2,100.00
6,156.64
2,018.40
1,891.80
384.49
259.99
11t25t2025 R&M/ CLEANTNG OF TH|CKE[\ 1,825.00 1,825.00
10131 12025 DOC SH REDDI NG
10131 12025 DOC SHREDDING
11 I 1312025 TOUGHBOOK COMPUTERS
1111912025 EE VISION INSURANCE - DEC
11t19t2025 COBRAVTSTON tNS - DEC
1111912025 RETIREES VISION INS - DEC
11 117 12025 SAND FOR BACKFILUREPAIR
135.00
45.00 266.07
1,486.77
8.22 8.22
419.6096249
Page: 8
43 apChklst
1211212025 10:21:424M
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
96250 12t12t2025 12751
Voucher:
(Continued)
WILLY CHERRY PT INC
Page: 9
Amount Paid Gheck Totallnv Date Descrintion
11 12512025 FASCIAL COUNTERSTRAIN S
11 12512025 FASCIAL COUNTERSTRAIN S
611512025 FASCIAL COUNTERSTRAIN S
812712025 FASCIAL COUNTERSTRAIN S
911512025 FASCIAL COUNTERSTRAIN S
101612025 APN: 315-040-57 JENSEN/IND
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
lnvoice
96251
96252
96253
96254
12082025
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t12t2025
Voucher:
12t1212025
Voucher:
12t8t2025
Voucher:
12999
12998
00931
04596
02737
9,900 00
2,250.00
450.00
450.00
450.00
350.00
350.00
40,121.05
1,758.50
225.00
125.00
352,037.80
13,500.00
350.00
350.00
41,879.55
350.00
352,037.80
0009
0008
0005
0006
0007
31504057YAKLIGIAN, DEBRA
YAKLIGIAN, JAMES A 31504057 101612025 APN: 31 5-040-57 JENSEN/IND YAMABE & HORN ENGINE 54551
54582
ZWEIGLE SEPTIC SERVI( 42019
42051
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRI( NOV
11t11t2025
1111112025
11t7t2025
11t26t2025
11t30t2025
LOCAL STREET IMPR PROJ 2
SANGER 26-27 CDBG APPLIC
TOI LET/HANDWASH (RANGE
R&M/ MAINT OF PORT-A-POT
GAS & ELECTRIC SRV
SubtotalforWESTAMER|CABANK: 874,682.00
Page: 9
44 apchklst
1211212025 1O:21:42AM
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page: l0
Grand TotalAll Checks: 874,682.00110 checks in this report. 01Page:
45 apchklst
1211912025 8:33:28AM Finat Check List
City of Sanger
Bank : waap WESTAMERTCA BANK
Check # Date
96255 12t19/2025 00922
Voucher:
CHEVROLET BUICK GMC
lnvoice
FIREVEHIC
lnv
12t1
Amount paid
39,290.90
Page: 1
39,280.90
812025 FIRE PREVENTION VEHICLE-
Sub totat for WESTAMERTCA BANK: 39,280.90
Page: 1
46 apchklst
1211912025 8:33:28AM FinatGheck List
Gity of Sanger Page: 2
1 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: %
Pagd,:2
47 apGhkLst
1?29nO25 3:04:48PM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor lnvoice
ACADEMYHARDWARE NOV
AIR EXCHANGE INC 91614987
12t2912025 00175
Voucher:
12t29t2025 04923
Voucher:
12t29t2025 10494
Voucher:
12t29t2025 00025
Voucher:
12t29t2025 07501
Voucher:
12t2912025 07501
Voucher:
12t29t202513003
Voucher:
12t29t2025 12864
Voucher:
12t2912025 00097
Voucher:
12t29t202510193
Voucher:
12t29t2025 00114
Voucher:
12t29t202510678
Voucher:
12t29t2025 12955
Voucher:
AIRGAS USA LLC
ALERT-O-LITE, INC
AT&T MOBILITY
AT&T MOBILIry
CALDERON, MIGUEL
5521 1 94663
9167259725
TT033627
287305911613
28730591 161 3
287288454255
Amount Paid
1,643.35
877.50
413.53
290.79
74.49 789.56
789.56
481.32
55.11 300.00
1,410.00
1,390.00
1,060.00
820.00
430.00
210.00
170.00
90.00 50.00
250.00
430.00
90.00 Page:1
Check Total
1,643.35
877.50
704.32
74.49 1,579.12
481.32
55.11 300.00
5,630.00
250.00
430.00
90.00 353.78
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
96256
96257
962s8
96259
96260
96261
96262
96263
96264
96265
96266
96267
96268
lnv Date Descrintion
11 I3OI2O25 HARDWARE/JAN ITORIAL SU F
7t3t2025 oRDER # 141541 LABORy TRI
11t30t2025 oXYGEN
1212t2025 oXYGEN
121812025 BARRICADE RENTAL FOR CH
11t2t2025
12t2t2025
12t2t2025
CELL PHN CHRGS (PWCD/RI
CELL PHN CHRGS (PW/CD/RI
CELL PHN CHRGS-FD #28728
BOARD OF STATE & CMN A8178-OO1
BOOT BARN INC INVOO54751O
BSK & ASSOCIATES INC
12110t2025 OWMH GRANT 2022: UNSPEI
121312025 SAFETY BOOTS (W. SANTOS
4131575
4t30988
At31078
At31904
Ar31570
Ar31823
4t30966
4t31741
At31798
5901
12t8t2025
12t2t2025
12t3t2025
12t11t2025
12t8t2025
12t10t2025
12t2t2025
12t10t2025
1211012025
11t2512025
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
LAB:WATER ANALYSIS
CALDERON-MPR 11.10.25
CALIFORNIA BUILDING OI 20122 911412025 EMPLOYEE TRAINING CAMARENA, KARLA REIMB 12t16t2025 GYM (SEPT-NOV)
CAREFUSION SOLUTIONI 1002661018-9 121812025 MEDICATION DISPENSER !{ tilal
353.78
Page:1
48 apchklst '
1212912025 3:03:52PM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
coMcAST 256927176
coMcAST CABLE COMM| 001003069477
CRISCOM COMPANY, THI 271639
EAGLESHIELD PEST CON 11046
ELECTRIC MOTOR SHOP RS-RI36625
EMPLOYAMERICA 4OK251O-IN
FERGUSON ENTERPRISE 0049811
FRESNO OXYGEN, INC. 0063686445
FRESNO TRUCK CENTEF R001229988:01
FRIBERG, JONATHAN 6371
GARCIA, ASHLEY 6042
GONZALEZ, TONY 6110
GORDONINDUSTRIAL 5513507
5517349
5511316
GRATNGER, rNC. 803589373
HARTFORD-PRIORIW AC 8691 69
HAVEN'S SECURITY INC 1029236851
KAUR, MANDEEP REIMB
lnv Date Description
12t1t2025 TELECOM SRVS #905357852
121112025 PHONE SERVICE - FD
1211212025 GRANT WRITING SVCS FOR
1113012025 PEST CONTROL SERVICES -
121412025 SUPPLIES/ SPRAY VARNISH I
1113012025 PARK MAINT - NOV 25
121512025 ANAEROBIC DIGESTER/ MET
1211212025 REFILL CO2 TANK: COLDSHC
12t10t2025 4356 COOLANT LEAK
11 t25t2025 FRTBERG-MPR 1 1. 1 5.25
11 t25t2025 GARCTA-MPR 8. 9.25
11 t25t2025 GONZALEZ-MPR 1 1 .8.25
1OI8I2O25 SUPPLIES/ MISC ITEMS
1211012025 SUPPLIES/ NITRILE GLOVES
91512025 SUPPLIES/ NITRILE GLOVES
121312025 SPEEDAIRE COMPRESSION I
1213112025 EE DISABILITY / LIFE INSURA
1211012025 MINOR EQUIP/ ABUS LOCKS
12t23t2025 GYM (OCT - DEC)
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
Amount Paid
2,602.27
574.07
7,000.00
546.00
17.53 4,999.23
482.74
39.54 890.81
250.00
250.00
250.00
Page: 2
Check Total
2,602.27
574.07
7,000.00
546.00
17.53 4,999.23
482.74
39.54 890.81
250.00
250.00
250.00
108.18
508.70
3,752.05
1,165.67
84.99 96269
96270
96271
96272
96273
96274
96275
96276
96277
96278
96279
96280
96281
96282
96283
96284
96285
12t29t2025 09872
Voucher:
12t2912025 12962
Voucher:
12t29t2025 11262
Voucher:
12129t202512559
Voucher:
1212912025 03885
Voucher:
12t29t2025 09307
Voucher:
12t29t2025 04821
Voucher:
12t29t2025 00331
Voucher:
12t29t2025 07't74
Voucher:
12t29t202513011
Voucher:
12t29t202513005
Voucher:
12t29t202513009
Voucher:
12t29t2025 06920
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t2912025
Voucher:
0041 9
08753
00382
13013
200.30
142.08
-234.20
508.70
3,752.05
1,165.67
84.99 Page'.2
49 apChklst'
1212912025 3:03:52PM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
LEAGUE OF CACITIES SS 8228
MANZO, TIFFANY 6341
MATA, MARIA 6389
METRO UNIFORM & ACCI 301074
MINERAL KING PUBLISHII 720596
MIRELES, SAMUEL 5736
MOORE TWINING ASSOC 2512118
2512416
2512415
2512133
2512134
2512162
MORALES, ANGELA 6199
MORALES, MAYRA 6200
MUNISERVICES LLC
OFFICE DEPOT
Page: 3
Amount Paid Check TotalInv Date Descriotion
DANIEL MARTINEZ - SSJVDM
EZEKIEL MEDELLIN - YBB 111
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
96286
96287
96288
96289
96290
96291
96292
96293
96294
96295
96296
12t29t2025 00528
Voucher:
12t29t202512824
Voucher:
121291202513010
Voucher:
12t29t2025 06571
Voucher:
12t29t2025 00811
Voucher:
12t29t202513007
Voucher:
12t29t2025 08962
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12945
13008
04045
03356
12t29t2025 08739
Voucher:
6t30t2025
12t8t2025
25.00 40.00
250.00
394.35
729.00
250.00
604.00
298.00
202.00
108.00
70.00 66.00
250.00
250.00
578.81
330.80
148.91
132.09
125.39
80.43 33.70
22.58 4.19
251.25
184.71
61.21 25.00
40.00 250.00
394.35
729.00
250.00
1,348.00
250.00
250.00
578.81
878.09
497.17
11 t25t2025 MATA-MPR 11.22.25
10t7t2025 CORONADO UNTFORM
121412025 CUP- PLANNING COMMISSIO
11 125t2025 M I RELES-MPR 9.20.25
11t26t2025
121512025
12t5t2025
11t26t2025
11t26t2025
12t1t2025
1112512025
WWTP/ PERMIT SAMPLING
WWTP/ PERMIT SAMPLING
INDUSTRIES/ PERMIT SAMPL
WWTP/ PERMIT SAMPLING
I NDUSTRYS/ PERMIT SAMPLI
WWTP/ PERMIT SAMPLING
MORALES-MPR 9.10.25
11 t25t2025 MORALES-MPR 1 0. 1 1.25
tNV06-022115 12t4t2025 STARS CA- Q22025
450607851 001
448612160001
448657049001
450733571001
450574387001
448851269001
448625349001
448612160002
2774-235144
2774-236484
2774-236792
12t3t2025
11t24t2025
12t9t2025
12t3t2025
12t8t2025
12t9t2025
11t24t2025
11t25t2025
12tst2025
12t16t2025
12118t2025
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES/ CALENDER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE 103
REPLACEMENT BATTERY FO
BRAKE REPAIR FOR GMC LIC
96297 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
Page: 3
50 apChkLst'
1212912025 3:03:52PM
Bank: waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
PETERS ROOFING INC 21160
PMSI 279293
279292
PRICE PAIGE & COMPAN\ 37214A
36457
373694
37214b
373698
PROFESSIONAL PRINT & 128007
128006
128005
127945
QUAD KNOPF, INC 130043
R.G. EQUIPMENT COMPA 191469
REXEL USA INC
REYES, BRYEN
REYES, NOE
SCAOF CA, LLC
SERPA'SAUTO & TIRE
SUBURBAN PROPANE
SWRCBACCOUNTING WS-1052647
TERRAWEST CONSTRU( 2
Page:4
Amount Paid Check Total
165.00 165.00
lnv Date Descriotion
121212025 R & M/ LABORATORY ROOF 2
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
96298
96299
96300
96301
96302
96303
96304
96305
96306
96307
96308
96309
96310
96311
12t29t2025 04133
Voucher:
12t29t2025 10475
Voucher:
12129t202512640
Voucher:
12129t2025 03989
Voucher:
12t29t2025 04028
Voucher:
12129t2025 08030
Voucher:
11t28t2025
11t26t2025
10t31t2025
6t30t2025
11t30t2025
10t31t2025
11t3012025
12t10t2025
12t12t2025
12t12t2025
1214t2025
12t1t2025
PMSI HVAC PM CONTRACT F
CITY HALL - THERMOSTATS
AUDIT PREPARATION
AUDIT PREPARATION
AUDIT PREPARATION
ASSIST WITH TYLER TECH &
ASSIST WITH TYLER TECH &
UB LATE NOTICES (DEC)
UB SHUT OFF NOTICES - DE(
INSERTS (SHUT OFF) - DEC
TUMBLER DECALS FOR PW {
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,459.00
1,072.00
8,841.00
6,271.00
4,813.00
2,906.00
938.00
874.47
428.63
252.18
163.09
584.00
199.48
144.96
79.70 9.98
171.53
250.00
250.00
7,550.00
61.65 456.00
26,674.04
415,017.16
4,531.00
23,769.00
1,718.37
584.00
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t202s
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12513
13006
13004
03531
06704
11796
01732
12654
1OI1OI2O25 EQUIPMENT MAINT
191470 1OI1OI2O25 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
191468 1OI1OI2O25 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
191012 9I3OI2O25 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
s144035124.001 12t2t2025 CLOCKS FOR CHRTSTMAS TF
5764 11 t25t2025 REYES-MPR 5.31.25
REIMB 11t25t2025 REYES- MPR 10.26.25
2025-011115 1113012025 PW ST SWEEPING - NOV 25
12168 11t6t2025 U120 PREVENT MArNT (OrU L
121212025 UTILITY/ PROPANE
121312025 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM F
1211212025 N ST RECONSTRUCTION
16170546765
434.12
171.53
250.00
250.00
7,550.00
61.65 456.00
26,674.04
415,017.16
Page:4
51 apChkLst'
1212912025 3:03:52PM
Bank: waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
(Continued)
lnvoice lnv Date Descriotion
THE SANGER SCENE 823 1013112025 PARKS & REC MASTER PLAN THE TABERNACLE 6370 1112512025 TABERNACLE-MPR 11.23.25
TREVINO, SANDRA REIMB 1212212025 GYM (NOV - DEC)
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES ll C|100-00237110 11t30t2025 TYLER TECHONOLOGIES : EI Page: 5
Amount Paid Check Total
96312
96313
96314
96315
96316
96317
96318
9631 I
96320
96321
96322
96323
96324
96325
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
09467
11304
10592
04091
110.00
250.00
60.00 8,397.09
4,766.72
2,100.00
700.00
24,385.24
375.39
334.76
45.00 740.00
63.93 860.00
1,482.40
8.22 8.22
114.18
80.00 28,922.30
25,554.55
21,437.75
10,899.60
110.00
250.00
60.00 15,963.81
24,385.2412t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12129t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
09303
04768
118r',0
01086
01620
12587
04798
cl 1 00-00238408 11 t30t2025
045-546679 11t30t2025
045-545990 11t26t2025
6244 11t15t2025
TYLER TECHONOLOGIES : El
TYLER TECHONOLOGIES : El
TYLER TECHONOLOGIES : El
CAL CARD PMTUS BANK
USA BLUE BOOK
VALLEY SHREDDING
1NV00890022
tNVo0889981
216113
710.15
45.00 12t29t2025 04321
Voucher:
12t29t2025 08626
Voucher:
12t29t2025 00931
Voucher:
VIDEO INSPECTION SER\ 9962
VI NCENT COMM U N I C AT K 91228
91229
VORTEX INDUSTRIES, LL 42-2094794
VSP JANUARY
JANUARY
JANUARY
VULCAN MATERIALS CO 5212627
WILLIAMS, KENNETH REIMB
YAMABE & HORN ENGINE 53660
53453
53832
53317
11t26t2025 WWTP/ AERATTON BASTN 1 C 9,400.00 9,400.00
1111912025 SUPPLIES/ PUMP PACKING
1111912025 SUPPLIES/ PUMP PACKING
11 I3OI2O25 DOC SHREDDI NG
121412025 RADIO REPAIR
1214t2025 BRACKET
1113012025 AUTO DOOR SERVICE
1212212025 EE VISION INSURANCE - JAN
1212212025 COBRAVISION INS - JAN
1212212025 RETIREES VISION INS - JAN
121512025 BASE ROCK: METER REPAIRT
12t4t2025 DOT EXAM
803.93
860.00
1,498.84
114.18
80.00 86,814.20
7t14t2025
6t10t2025
8113t2025
5t13t2025
PROJ 22-257 SOMERSET SUI
PROJ 22-257 SOMERSET SUI
PROJ 22-257 SOMERSET SUI
PROJ 22-257 SOMERSET SUI
Page: 5
52 apChklst'
1A292025 3:03:52PM
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
Page: 6
SubtotalforWESTAMER|CABANK: 6U,208.41
Page:6
53 aFhkLsf
12/2912025 3:03:52PM
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page: 7
Grand TotalAll Checks: 664,208.4170 checks in this report.
Page:7
54 rpChklst
12129//2025 3:08:57PM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Sheck# Date Vendor
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
Page: I
Amount Paid Check Totallnvoice
CAMPOS, JOSE RIVERA RefOOO110565
HUELITL FRANCISCO, FE Re000110567
MATAPENALOZA, JUAN RefOOO110566
PADILLA, PAMELA JUNE Ref000110568
VILLAREAL, SILVIA Ref000110564
Refund Cst #00025945
Refund Cst #00027691
Refund Cst #00026644
Refund Cst #00028302
Refund Cst #00023204
lnv Date Descriotion
96326
96327
96328
96329
96330
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
12t2912025
Voucher:
12t29t2025
Voucher:
1301s
13017
13016
13018
13014
140.86
49.14 155.38
200.00
24.61 140.86
49.14 155.38
200.00
24.61 569.99
12t29t2025
12t29t2025
12t29t2025
12t29t2025
12t29t2025
UB
UB
UB
UB
UB
Sub total for WESTAMERICA BANK:
i)t\ tt)zqlr{
Page: 1
55 apChkLst
1212912025 3:08:57PM
5 checks in this report.
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Grand TotalAll Ghecks:
Page: 2
569.99
Page:2
56 City of Sanger Fire Department
Greg Tarascou, Fire Chief
1700 7th Street • Sanger, CA 93657 • Phone (559) 875-6568 • Fax (559) 875-6611 January 7, 2026
To: Ho
norable Mayor and Council Members
Nathan Olson, City Manager
From: G
reg Tarascou, Fire Chief
RE: F
IRE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR DECEMBER
Fo
r the month of December there were 248 calls for services for ambulance services within our area and within surrounding areas. Crews were also dispatched to 51 requests for services in December for fire calls, including house fires, trash and warming fires, building fires, vehicle fires and unintentional or false alarm calls. This total equates to 299 calls in December, or just over 9 calls per day.
Chute
times are measured from the time the station is notified of an alarm to the time the unit goes enroute.
For the month of December our chute time was 65 seconds, well below our benchmark of 90 seconds.
Approximately 34% of the time our chute time was measured at less than 45 seconds. Our travel time is measured from the time the unit is enroute to the time that we arrive on scene. For December our median response time was 5 minutes, 26 seconds within the City. This is just under our benchmark of under 6 minutes within the City. Our total call time for the month of December for EMS calls was measured at one hour, 48 minutes per call.
The
Fire Department continued our recruitment efforts with our vacancies at single-role EMT, Firefighter and Fire Prevention Inspector. In December, we completed the pre-employment process for the vacancies of Fire Prevention Inspector and welcomed Aubree Wilhelm as our newest Inspector. In addition, we also completed the pre-employment process for our newest Firefighter candidate Matthew Fries and Single-Role EMT Oscar Mendez. They have both started their field training time and are doing well. We still have one vacancy in the Single-Role position and two in the Firefighter position.
In De
cember we were very active with the many holiday events in the City. We participated in the tree lighting event at Brehler Square, the annual Christmas Parade and the Trek to the Tree. Also, we had off-duty personnel assist with placing the lights on the Sanger Woman’s Club and participate in the annual Fire/PD Toy Giveaway.
Admin
istratively, our leadership staff participated in training that will require us to change our incident reporting software starting January 1, 2026. Historically, we have reported all of our incidents Federally to the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) and as of 2026 this will be replaced at the Federal level with the National Emergency Response Information System (NERIS). This change was initiated by the United States Fire Administration several years ago with the intent of being a more robust, data-rich platform that will equip our department with an empirical basis for decision-making. However, like many new programs it is not without its idiosyncrasies. For example, we are not sure we will be able to report our response times as in prior years. In addition, we are unable to print out incident reports, and we will have to document fire G-4
57 investigations separately until these modules are activated in NERIS. With these changes the leadership staff have remained committed to continuing to work with our Federal partners to do what we can to assist with this transition.
I am alw
ays available if you have any questions.
58 Revised 06/2025
SANGER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Monthly Report
December 2025
John Re
ynolds
Chief of Police
Summa
ry:
In 2025
, Part I crime in Sanger remained stable, with 412 total offenses compared to 419 in 2024 (-2%). Crimes against persons increased slightly to 123 incidents (+7%), driven by a small rise in aggravated assaults (106 vs. 102, +4%), while homicides remained at zero and both rape and robbery declined. Property crimes decreased marginally to 289 incidents (-1%), as significant reductions in auto theft (-38%) and arson (-43%) offset an increase in burglaries (+27%). The department cleared 57 Part I cases, maintaining an overall clearance rate of approximately 15%, with violent crime clearance rates exceeding national averages, reflecting effective investigative and enforcement efforts.
For t
he month of December, there was a notable increase in domestic violence incidents (10 vs. 4, +150%) in addition to an increase in felony arrests (23 vs. 13, +77%).
Call
s for Service:
Call Type Current
Month
Previous
Month
% Change
Total Calls 2594 2564 1.2%
Self-
Initiated
1074 964 11.4%
Cri
me Statistics:
Crime Type Current Month Previous Month %
Change
Homicide 0 0 0%
Assault 7 7 0%
Robberies 0 0 0%
Burglaries 4 2 100%
G-5
59 Revised 06/2025
Arrest and Citations:
Category Count
Felony Arrests 23
Misdemeanor
Arrests
19 DUI Arrests 6
Traffic Citations 103
Notable Incidents:
December 6, 2025
Officers responded to Canal Drive and Fink Avenue for DUI related traffic accident. The solo vehicle involved was located resting on its passenger side with the driver still behind the steering wheel. The driver was evaluated and determined to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs and following the execution of blood draw search warrant, he was booked at the Fresno County Jail. No other people were injured.
December 18-21, 2025
Detectives participated with the Central Valley Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force operation called “Operation Naughty or Nice”, which lead to the arrests of 21 potential sexual predators. The charges varied but were related to arranging to meet with a child for sex. A total of 17 federal, state, and local agencies assisted. The Sanger Police Department is an affiliate agency with the task force and as the County’s third largest city aims at keeping our children safe.
December 22, 2025
Officers were dispatched to the 1000 block of Almond Ave. regarding a report of three male walking around the area with ski masks. The three males were located and contacted by officers resulting in their recovering a loaded handgun magazine on one of them along with the ski masks. All three were active gang members and two of the three were juveniles. The adult male was arrested for threats made to the reported party, probation violation and possession of ammunition. The Juveniles were turned over to parents.
December 23, 2025
Detective served a search warrant at 4627 N. Glenn Ave. in the City of Fresno related several vehicle burglaries in the City of Sanger. Along with stolen property, a “ghost” handgun was located. The suspect was arrested and transported to the Freno County Jail for charges related to the stolen property and illegal firearm possession.
Officers responded to the 1200 block of P St. for an attempted suicide. Officers intervened in the attempt and rendered lifesaving medical aid until relieved by EMS.
December 25, 2025
Officers responded to the 2700 block of Casty Ct. for a report of an injured person who had stopped breathing. Officer provided lifesaving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) upon 60 Revised 06/2025
arrival and with the Sanger Fire Department when they arrived. The 24-year-old male was subsequently transported to the hospital.
December 30, 2025
Officers were dispatched to the 600 block of Eastwood for an assault with a deadly weapon.
The male suspect reportedly driving his vehicle chased and rammed a vehicle driven by a female victim along with three children on board. The male was arrested and transported to the Freno County Jail.
Community Engagement:
Members of the Police Department participated in the Annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony on December 3
rd, the Toyland Parade on December 6th, and the 100th year anniversary of the Trek to the Tree on December 14th.
In addition, members, family, and friends of the police and fire departments participated in the annual toy giveaway. 14 families were identified through coordination with our school resource officers and personnel responding to calls for service in the community. Commencing at 8:00 am on Saturday, December 20
th, with emergency vehicle lights and siren along with Santa Claus, volunteers traveled throughout the streets of Sanger taking Christmas cheer and joy to many families, Toys were provided to neighborhood children as well. This 13 th annual event
was well received by the community.
Community Immersion Training:
Three new officers took part in a community immersion training on December 4, 2025.
Designed to indoctrinate new personnel to the cultural and roots of the City of Sanger, the full day of training included the following:
• Welcome and expectations from the mayor, police and fire chiefs. • History, origins, heritage, and development of the City of Sanger provided by the Sanger Historical Foundation.
• Agriculture and business history provided by Marechal Vineyards. • Introduction to the Sanger High School Military and Public Service Academy • A lunch with community leaders and members of Sanger Young Life, city manager, and mayor.
• Sports and community pride with the Sanger High School along with a tour and history of Tom Flores Stadium, Sanger Apache Football, and the Sanger High School Hall of Fame.
• A community roundtable with business stakeholders discussing traditions and community expectations.
• Reflection and feedback in which all three officers expressed appreciation to gain an understanding of the community they will be providing law enforcement services.
Personnel and Staffing:
• Officers Marissa Burkdoll, John Ayers, and Sadie Bernal were sworn in and started the field training program on December 1, 2025. All three officers come with previous law 61 Revised 06/2025
enforcement experience and two of the three are expected to begin solo officer roles by mid-January.
• Officer Jose Pacheco resigned from service on December 24, 2025, to accept an investigator position with the State of California Alcoholic Beverage Control. Officer Pacheco had been with the department for just under 3 years. • Current recruitments are active for Police Officer and Police Cadet Positions with four police officer vacancies.
Capital Projects:
The Police Department Communications Center entered the permitting process in December 2025. Once complete, a request for qualifications (RFQ) will be published to solicit qualifications from design-build teams. Those determined to meet the qualifications will submit a request for proposal (RFQ), which will be evaluated for technical approach, schedule, and costs. The Police Department will then return to Council for the design-build team approval.
2025 Design Rendering
62 Prepared by: Raymond Martin____ Approved by: _____________________
REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION _X__ Consent
____ Info Item
_X__ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency
____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2026
Agenda Item No.: G-6
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and City Council M embers
From: Nathan Olson, City Manager
Subject: Receipt of Update on Emergency Repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant Pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-95 and Request to Continue Declaration of Emergency
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 2025-95 and Resolution No. 2026-01
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
None known.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend that the City Council r eceive Report from City Manager Regarding Emergency Repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant per Resolution No. 2025-95 and adopt Resolution 2026-01 Continuing the Declaration of Emergency.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this staff report is to provide an updated status on the emergency repairs initiated under the Determination of Emergency to address the Sanger Domestic/Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). This report summarizes the progress made, challenges encountered, and financial implications of the ongoing repair efforts. Based on the status and projected needs, it is recommended to continue with emergency actions under Resolution No. 2025-95 to ensure timely and effective completion of the repairs.
Reports on actions taken and status of the emergency will continue to be made at each regular meeting of the City Council.
63 B
ACKGROUND:
• July 18, 2024: City Manager Nathan Olson (as the Director of Emergency Services) declared an emergency at the Sanger Domestic/Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility, requiring emergency repairs. Immediate emergency repairs were identified for the WWTF Digester, the Industrial/Domestic Headworks, and WWTF Bypass Pump. Reference Resolution 2024-48.
• A
ugust 2024: Repairs commenced, starting with the cleaning of the Digester, followed by work on the Industrial Headworks. The Digester was cleaned out, and its valves were replaced. • November 21, 2024: City Council reviewed and ratified agreements with Rockeez and VIS for work on the Industrial Headworks and cross-contamination emergency repairs. A new bypass pump was installed during this time to correct cross-contamination issues after the thickening clarifier. • December 2024: Repairs on the Industrial Headworks were completed, including epoxy coating, installation of a new line, concrete pit repairs, and valve replacements. Work immediately began on the Domestic Headworks.
• Early 2025: Domestic Headworks received attention due to debris buildup caused by a malfunctioning Bar Screen. The Bar Screen was under warranty; parts were ordered and fixed. • January 16, 2025 : City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. This renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-03. • March 20, 2025: City Council reviewed and ratified the agreement with Rockeez for Domestic Headworks repairs. Work began on the Primary Effluent Pump Chambers related to the clarifiers. • April 17, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. This renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-28. • A
pril 17, 2025: Work on the Primary Effluent Pump Chambers was completed in early April. City Council reviewed and ratified the agreement with Rockeez for the Primary Effluent Pump Chambers. Reference Resolution 2025-29.
• May 15, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. This renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-
35. • M
ay 2025: Clarifiers are being prepped for their extensive rehab and epoxy coatings. Distribution box #7 was rehabbed and epoxied.
• Ju
ne 2025: VIS spearheaded a free testing and demonstration of new sealant technology on the decayed lines of the Wastewater Treatment Facility to promising results. A contract with Telstar for Scada repairs and upgrades is in review.
• June 27, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs and approved a budget amendment to the 2024/25 fiscal year appropriating $800,000 in funds for the Wastewater Treatment Facility emergency repairs . The renewal emphasized the n
ecessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-43.
• July 17, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-
55. • Ju
ly/August 2025: Repairs are underway on Clarifier #2, which has also received extensive coating with Mainstay for enhanced durability. Preparations have begun for the Digester rehabilitation project, a comprehensive effort expected to span over 30 days. The scope includes mechanical repairs, replacement of 64 various pipes and valves, and application of Mainstay coating to the dome structure. Staff have been meeting with Telstar and are preparing to upgrade the SCADA system. • August 7, 2025: City Council approved the contract with Diamond Weld to construct a new Sludge Tank.
This addition is a key component of the broader Digester rehabilitation initiative. • August 21, 2025 : City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-70. • August 22, 2025: VIS has initiated cleaning operations on the digester in preparation for the upcoming rehabilitation project. Rockeez has placed orders for the necessary materials, and epoxy application to the digester dome is expected to last approximately five weeks, marking a key phase in completing the digester rehabilitation effort.
• September 4, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-72.
• September 18, 2025 : Diamond Weld Industries met with the City and went over scope to demolition the existing sludge tank and fabricate a new one on site. Work is scheduled to begin September 29,2025 and will last approximately 3 weeks. VIS finalized their cleaning operations of the Digester. Rockeez began the process of repairing and replacing piping, valves and gauges on the Digester as well as mobilizing for the Digester Dome rehab project. Clarifier #2 warranty work commenced and is scheduled for completion September 21 & 22, 2025. City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-75.
• September 19, 2025: Clarifier #2 was reinforced with a chicken wire concrete bottom and then Mainstay coating was applied. The Mainstay has cured, and the mechanicals components and arms will be reinstalled 9/23. Ongoing repair and replacing of piping, valves and gauges on the Digester. Several parts on order and completion date depended on the arrival of said parts.
• September 30, 2025: Clarifier #2 is back in service. The sludge tank is demolished, and materials are being brought for the onsite construction of the new tank to begin on 10/2. • October 2, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-79.
• October 13, 2025: Clarifier 2 was previously taken out of service for warranty repairs and is now back in service. Sludge Tank is complete and undergoing testing. Thickener Clarifier and Digester Dome rehabilitation are still on schedule for November 2025. • October 16, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-82.
• October 20, 2025: Contractor commenced scaffolding set up for Digester Dome Rehab and the Draining of Thickener Clarifier commenced, with sludge temporarily routed to the sludge drying beds. • November 4, 2025: Contractor commenced sandblasting of Digester in preparation for epoxy coating. The Thickener Clarifier is offline, and the mechanicals have been removed in preparation for sandblasting and epoxy. The mechanical components will need to be fabricated and repaired. • November 6, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-86.
• November 20, 2025: Scaffolding scheduled to be removed first week in December . Working to fix piping, gauges and meters. Working to get quotes for DAF, Roughing Filter and Clarifier 3. 65 • November 25, 2025: Scaffolding removed. Repairs to Digester still ongoing with parts on order. • D
ecember 2, 2025: Received quote for Thickener rebuild in stainless steel , $55,380.43. R epairing and replacing the skimmer arms, rakes and column w ith s tainless steel extends the lifespan of these critical components. Stainless steel resists rust and chemical attack far better than carbon steel, especially in wastewater environments where exposure to moisture, sludge, and chemicals is constant. • D
ecember 4, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-89.
• December 2025: Digester columns repaired and dome is epoxy sealed. Repairs are underway for the valves, meters, cracked lines and plugged lines. SCADA PLC programming is complete, upgrade progress meeting set for January 8
th. Thickener Clarifier work continues.
• December 18, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-95.
Note: Due to the age and condition of existing infrastructure at the Wastewater Treatment Facility, additional deficiencies may be identified as work progresses. As such, all dates and milestones are subject to revision in response to emerging operational needs, safety considerations, or unforeseen complications.
RE
ASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
T
hese emergency repairs are critical to ensure the protection of health, safety, and welfare of City residents and to protect the Wastewater Treatment Facilities. The City’s Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant are still undergoing critical maintenance and repair. Remaining tasks include cleaning, inspecting, repairing, and applying new epoxy remaining clarifiers and the thickener, inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing. Additionally, as repair and maintenance efforts progress, previously unanticipated deficiencies and infrastructure issues have continued to emerge, necessitating immediate attention to prevent further system degradation and ensure uninterrupted plant operations.
F
ISCAL IMPACT:
T
he exact fiscal impact is not fully known at this time as the work is being performed on a Time and Material basis due to the time sensitivity, but Staff will provide an updated budget for the project at further upcoming Council meetings.
66 Any additional costs for more repairs and materials will be brought back to City Council and addressed appropriately. The costs will be funded from Sewer Enterprise funds.
ALTERNATIVES:
No recommended alternatives. Until all repairs and maintenance are done, the Wastewater Treatment Plant remains non-compliant.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:
Per the Resolution, Staff will provide Council updates and seek ratification of any contracts at those meetings. 67 ATTACHMENT 1
68 RESOLUTION NO. 2025.95
A RESOLUTION OF'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER CONTINUING
THE DECLARATION PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
REGARDING THE SANGER DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT F'ACILITY
AND THE INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
WHEREAS, the City of Sanger operates the Sanger Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility (hereafter "Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Facilities"; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager to serve as the Director of Emergency Services issued a proclamation of local emergency for emergency repairs, which included (but is not limited to) the following: Digester repairs as needed after inspection; repairs as needed to the domestic headworks including epoxy coating to headwork; draining and inspection of all clarifiers; as well as repairing mechanical components and epoxy coating to clarifiers, and inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing.; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved and renewed the Director of Emergency Services' determination on December 4,2025, pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-89; and WHEREAS, the City Council has regularly received reports regarding the emergency and reviewed the need for continuing the local emergency and intended for the same; and WHEREAS, the City Manager requests that the City Council continue the declaration of a state of local emergency for the City as impacts regarding emergency repairs to the wastewater treatment facility continue to be evaluated, repaired, and or mitigated; and WHEREAS, the existing SCADA system needs upgrading, and the status of the needed repairs include cleaning, inspecting, repairing, and applying new epoxy to anaerobic digester, clarifiers and the thickener, inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to continue the emergency for purposes of procurement to ensure the City is able to procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those pulposes, without giving notice for bids to let contracts.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to continue the duration of the declaration of emergency as there is a need for the same as set forth above.
NOW, THEREFORE the City Council resolves as follows:
Section 1. The recitals herein are incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the need for continuing the local emergency and finds that the state of emergency conditions related to the Domestic and Industrial Wastewater 69 Facilities are ongoing and are recognized as an imminent threat to our citizens. In accordance with Public Contracts Code Section22050 and Sanger City Code Section 2-206 (h), the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property. As such, the City Council extends and continues the declaration of a local emergency regarding the Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facilify.
Section 3. The emergency will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids, and that the action is necessary to respond to the emergency.
Section 4. Per Public Contract Code Section 22050 (c ) (1) the City Council shall review the emergency action at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the action is terminated.
Section 5. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.
The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council for the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of December 2025, and approved by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
GONZALEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ
NONE
NONE
MARTINEZ
ATTEST:
Martinez, City Clerk
70 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER CONTINUING
THE DECLARATION PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
REGARDING THE SANGER DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
AND THE INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
WHEREAS, the City of Sanger operates the Sanger Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility (hereafter “Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Facilities”; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager to serve as the Director of Emergency Services issued a proclamation of local emergency for emergency repairs, which included (but is not limited to) the following: Digester repairs as needed after inspection; repairs as needed to the domestic headworks including epoxy coating to headwork; draining and inspection of all clarifiers; as well as repairing mechanical components and epoxy coating to clarifiers, and inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing.; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved and renewed the Director of Emergency Services’ determination on December 18, 2025, pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-95; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has regularly received reports regarding the emergency and reviewed the need for continuing the local emergency and intended for the same; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager requests that the City Council continue the declaration of a state of local emergency for the City as impacts regarding emergency repairs to the wastewater treatment facility continue to be evaluated, repaired, and or mitigated; and
WHEREAS, the existing SCADA system needs upgrading, and the status of the needed repairs include cleaning, inspecting, repairing, and applying new epoxy to anaerobic digester, clarifiers and the thickener, inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to continue the emergency for purposes of procurement to ensure the City is able to procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes, without giving notice for bids to let contracts.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to continue the duration of the declaration of emergency as there is a need for the same as set forth above.
NOW, THEREFORE the City Council resolves as follows:
Section 1. The recitals herein are incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the need for continuing the local emergency and finds that the state of emergency conditions related to the Domestic and Industrial Wastewater 71 Facilities are ongoing and are recognized as an imminent threat to our citizens. In accordance with Public Contracts Code Section 22050 and Sanger City Code Section 2-206 (h), the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property. As such, the City Council extends and continues the declaration of a local emergency regarding the Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Section 3. T he emergency will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids, and that the action is necessary to respond to the emergency.
Section 4. Per Public Contract Code Section 22050 (c ) (1) the City Council shall review the emergency action at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the action is terminated.
Section 5. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.
The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council for the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15
th day of January 2026, and approved by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lina Martinez, City Clerk
72 Prepared by: Joshua Goggins Approved by: ________________________ 01484.0005 2069836.1
REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION _X__ Consent
____ Info Item
____ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency
____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2025
Agenda Item No.: G-7
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Joshua Goggins , Community Development Director
Subject: Amendment to CSG Consultant Agreement for Community Development Services and Associated Resolution Approving a Budget Amendment.
Attachments: (1) First Amendment to Agreement
(2) Amendment No. 1
(3) Original Agreement
(4) Current Fee Schedule
(5) Resolution - Budget Amendment
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ratify the City Manager ’s approval of a n amendment to extend the consultant agreement for Community Development Services between City and CSG Consultants to provide as-needed Community Development Services through June 30, 2026, and approve a budget amendment for $115,024 to implement the same.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In 2021, the City of Sanger entered into an agreement with CSG Consulting, Inc. to provide Community Development services, including Building Official Services, Building Inspection Services, Building Permit Plan Check Services, and later Code Enforcement. The agreement originally expired on June 30, 2024, and was extended through June 30, 2025. In an effort to audit and bring all contracts up to date, staff identified that the latest amendment (inadvertently named “First Amendment”) needed to be ratified as the City Manager’s spending authority is being exceeded and a budget amendment is needed.
The City Council is requested to ratify the approval of the First Amendment to ensure as -needed Community Development services (including Building Official, Building Inspection, Plan Check, and Code Enforcement) through June 20, 2026, and to approve a related budget amendment. 73 01484.0005 2069836.1
BACKGROUND:
The City of Sanger has historically used contract services for construction plan check services, building inspections during periods of high development activity, and Building Official services for complex issues.
The City has used various vendors in the past and is currently contracting with CSG Consulting, Inc. for Community Development services. The Community Development Department has relied more heavily on contract services post COVID and, within the past year, has also used contract services for Code Enforcement following repeated efforts to fill budgeted positions. The department has filled several positions and is rebuilding toward full staffing; however, as staff are trained and onboarded to their roles, the department will continue to rely on contract services to ensure completion of necessary work.
An agreement with CSG Consulting, Inc. was approved in 2021 and expired on June 30, 2024. The first extension to the original agreement was titled Amendment No. 1 and was executed in 2024, extending the agreement through June 30, 2025. The second extension, inadvertently named the “First Amendment” was the second extension approved in May of this year to help ensure the City continued to receive on- call Community Development services as needed.
As part of a recent review to help ensure all contracts up to date, Staff determined that the value of the First Amendment extension was starting to exceed the City Manager’s spending authority and a budget amendment was needed to fully fund the services through the end of the fiscal year . As a result, the First Amendment and associated budget amendment are now before the City Council for ratification and approval to ensure that the City continues to receive support from CSG Consulting, Inc. for Community Development services.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of this item will ensure the City continues to receive reliable Building Official, Building Inspection, Plan Check, and Code Enforcement as needed by the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budget amendment for $115,024 to cover Community Development Services costs through June 30, 2026.
Portions of these costs are offset through revenue (Building Construction Plan Check, Building Permit, Inspection Fees, etc.). Portions of these costs are offset through savings in vacant budgeted employee positions.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council can deny the amendment to extend the consulting services agreement and direct staff accordingly.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:
The City Manager will sign the amendment to extend the agreement with CSG Consultants. Staff will record the budget amendment.
74 75
76 77
78 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CITY OX'SANGER
AGREEMENT WITH CSG CONSULTING, INC.
This Amendment No.1 to the City of Sanger Agreement with CSG Consulting, Inc. is entered by and between the City of Sanger, California, a municipal corporation, ("City") and CSG CONSULTING, INC. (Consultant).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant entered into an agreement on May 6, 202lfor Community Development Services (Building Official, Building Inspection, Building Construction Plan Check, Fire Plan Check, and Code Enforcement).
WHEREAS, the agreement expired on June 30,2024.
WHEREAS, the Consultant has continued to provide services.
WHEREAS, the Consultant has provided an updated fee schedule (attached).
WHEREAS, the parties wish to expressly extend the Agreement through June 30, 2025.
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and covenants herein, the parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 1 of the Agreement regarding Scope of Services is amended by adding the following pangraph:
Effective July 1, 2024, the Scope of Services attached as Exhibit A to the Agreement is replaced by an updated Scope of Services attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. Section 2 of the Agreement regarding the Term is amended to add aparagraphto read as follows:
The term of this Agreement is extended to June 30,2025.
SECTION 3. Section 3 of the Agreement regarding Compensation is amended by adding the following paragraph:
Effective July 1, 2024, the Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit B to the Agreement is replaced by a.t updated Fee Schedule attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit B.
SECTION 4. This AmendmentNo. I is effective July 1, 2024.
SECTION 5. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in fullforce and effect.
79 below:
IN WITI\ESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. I as set forth
CITY OF SANGER
N Olson, City Manager
Date: /Z
ATTEST:
Tamez, City
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Hilda Cantu Montoy, City Attorney
CSG CONSULTING,INC.
Cyrus Kianpour, President
c
Date:
12-13-2024
80 AGREEMENT BETWEEN TIIE CITY OF SANGER AND
CSG CONSULTANTS ['OR BUILDING SERVICES
This Agreement is made and cntcrrd into effectiv, on fl41 &, 2021byund bctwcen the City of $anger, a California municipal corporation, (hereinaflcr fefcned to as o'ClTY") and CSG Consultants, Inc. (hereinater'referred to as "CONSULTANT").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY desires to obtain consultant services from a qualified consultant to provide building department services.
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT warrants that it is specially trained, experienced, expert, and oompetent to perform such services and hereby represents that it desires to and is professionally and legally capable of performing the services called for by this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals which are part of this Agreement and the terms and conditions hereinafter oontained, it is mutually agreed as follows:
l. Scone of Ssrvices. CONSULTANT shall perform to the satisfaction of CITY, serices as reguested by CITY as specifioally set forth in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto,
Term ol'Anreamcnt, This Agreement shall be effective from , 2021 to June 30,2024, subject to any carlier termination in accordance with this Agreement. Thereafter, this agreement may be extended annually by mutual agreement of CITY and CONSULTANT.
Csmpensation. CONSULTANT'S sole oompensation for satisfactory performanoe of all services required or rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be at the rates and schedules attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
Termination.
(a) This Agreement and all obligations hereunder may be terminated at any time, with or without cause, by the CITY upon written notice to the CONSULTANT upon thirfy (30) day's written notiae, CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement upon 60 days' written notice.
(b) If Consultant fails to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement, in addition to all other remedies provided by law, City may terminate tiris Agreement immediately upon written notice.
(c) Upon termination with or without cause, all finished and unfinished documents, project data and reports shall, at the option of the City, become its sole property and shall, at Consultant's expense, be delivered to the City or to any party it may so designate.
1 z
3. 4
81 ($ [n the event termination is without cause, Consultant shall bo entitled to any compensation owing it hereunder up to the time of such termination, it being understood that any payments are full compensation for services rendered prior to the time of payment; provided, however, that Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for work in progress at the time oftermination. (e) Noticeoftennination shall be mailed as follows:
To the City:
City of
Sanger
Attn: Tom Navarrq Community Development Director
I 700 7h Street
Sanger, CA 93657
To the Consultant:
CSG Consultants,Inc.
Attn: Cyrus Kianpour, President
550 Pilgrim Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
With a copy to:
CSG Consultants,Inc.
Attn: Crickett M. Brinkman, Regional Operations Manager 930 Fresno Street
' Newman, CA 95360
Indemnification. To the frirthest extent allowed by law, CONSULTANT agrees to indemniff, including the cost to defend, City and eaoh of its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against all claims, demands, costs, or liability, and €xpenses including attomey's fees arising out of the performanoe of the work described in this Agreement, caused in whole or in parf by the sole negligence, recklessness, or witlful misconduct of CONSULTANT, its prinoipals, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers in the performance of this Agreement or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable excluding, however, such claims, demands, loss, damages, or arising from City's sole negligence or willful acts.
6, Insurance.
(a) Throughout the life of this Agreement CONSULTANT shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all insurance as required in Bxhibit'oC" or as may be authorized, and any additional insurance as may be requircd, in writing by City Manager or his or hor designee at any time and in her sole discretion. (b) Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for CITY to terminate this Agrecment. No action taken by CITY pursuant to this section shall in any way relieve CONSULTANT of its responsibilities under this Agreement.
5. 7
82 ?.
8. Nondissriminatisu. To the extent required by oontrolling federal, statc, and local law, CONSULTANT shall not employ disuiminatory practices in the provision of services, employment of personnel, or in any other respect on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physioal disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran, or veteran ofthe Vietnam era.
lndepsndgqt Conlrflctor. In the fumishing of the services provided for herein, CONSULTANT is acting solely as an independent contractor. Neither CONSULTANT, norany of its officers, agents, or employees shall be deemed an officer, agent, employee, joint venture, partner, or associate of CITY for any purpose. CITY shall have no right to control or supervise or direot the manner or mothod by which CONSULTANT shall perform its work and functions. However, CITY shall retain the right to administer this Agreement so as to verifr that CONSULTANT is performing its obligations in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof.
Notices. Any notice required or intended to be given to either party under the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be duly given if delivered personally, transmitted by faosimile followed by telephone confirmation of receipt, or sent by United States registered or certified mail, with postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the parfy which notice is to be given at the party's address set forth on the signature page ofthis Agreement or at such other address as the parties may fiom time to time designato by written notice. Notices served by United States mail in the manner above described shall be deemed suffrciently served or given at the time of mailingthereof.
A$giqnment. This agreement is personal to cONSULTANT and there shall be no assignment by CONSULTANT of its rights of obligations under this Agreement without the prior written approval ofthe City Manager or her.designee.
Cornpliancg with La$ In providing the services required under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall at all times comply with all applicable laws of the United States, the State of Califomia and CITY, and with all applicable regulations promulgated by federal, state, regional, or local administrative and regulatory agencies, now in force and as they may be enacted, issuedo or amended during the term of this Agreement.
Waiver. The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a oontinuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Agreement. No provisions of this Agreement may be waived unless in writing and signed by all parties to this Agreement, Waiver of any one provision herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of iny other provision herein.
9. 10.
ll.
tz
aJ
83 t4.
15. l6
t3.
17. Governins Law snd,.VenJg. This Agreement shall be govemed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws ofthe State ofCaliforniao excluding, howevern any conflict of laws rule which would apply the law of another jurisdiction. Venue for purposcs of the filing of any action tegarding enforcement or interpretation of this Agreement and any rights and duties hereunder shall be San Francisco, California.
H"qadinqs. The section headings in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall not be construed or held in any way to explain, modiff, or add to the interpretation or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement.
Scverability. ,The provisions of this Agreement are severable. The invalidity or unenforceability of any one provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions.
lntcrptet{tion. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement in its final form is the result ofthe combined efforts of the parties and that, should any provision of this Agreement be found to be ambiguous in any way, such ambiguity shall not be resolved by construing this Agreement in favor of or against either party, but rathor by construing the terms in accordance with their generally accepted meaning.
Attor.ncysl Fe$. If either party is required to commence any proceeding or legal action to enforce or intetpret any term, covenant, or condition ofthis Agreement, the prevailing parfy in such proceeding or action shall be entitled to recover from the other party its reasonable attorneys' fees and tegal expenses.
Efhibitl. Each exhibit and affachment refcrenced in this Agreement is, by the reference, incorporated into and made a part ofthis Agreement.
Pre.ccclenceQfDocnments.Inthe eventofany conflictbetween the bodyofthis Agreement and any Exhibit or Attachment hereto, the terms and conditions of the body of this Agreement shall control and take precedence over the terms and conditions expressed within the Exhibit or Attachment. Furthermore, any terms or conditions contained within any Exhibit or Attachment hereto which purport to modify the allocation of risk between the parties, provided for within the body of this Agreement, shall be null and void. gumulative Renrcdi€S. No remedy or election hereunder shall be deemed exclusive but shall, wherever possible, be oumulative with all other remedies at taw or in equity.
Np'l'hiqd-Partv Bsueliciaries. The rights, interests, duties and obtigations defined within this Agreement are intended for the specific parties hereto as identified in the preamble of this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything statEd to tho conhary n this Agreement, it is not intended ttrat any rights or interests in this Agreement benefitor flow tolhe interest of any third parties.
l&
19. N.
2t.
4 84
CITY OF SANOER
A muniolpal oorporafion
csc, CoNSLTLTANTS, INC.
Cyrus Prcsidcnt
Datn .2021
Tim Chqpg CityManager
nale: SI t ,zozt
5 85
Exhibit'A'
SCOPE OI'SERYICES
See ExhibitB.
Consultant to perform sewices in conformance with City of Sanger CiU Code Chapter 14 and any other applicable, local State orNational codes on behalf ofthe City. 6 86
Exhibit'B'
F'EE SCHEDULE
CSG services are billed on a time-and-materials basis according to our Standard Rates, shownbelow.
All hourly rates include overhesd costs including, but not limited to, salaries, benefits, Worlcers Compensation Insuranoe, lravel and ffice expenses. CSG will coordinale the pichtp and return of plans to andfrom CSG via a licensed courier, On each anniversary of the contract start date, CSG will initiate a rate increase based an the change in CPI for the applicable region. CSG will mail an invoice every monthfor services rendered during the previous month.
7 :ull Plan Review 75o/" oI Cit/s Bulldins Plan Check Fees itructuralPlan Review 5A% d Citv's Buildins Plan Check Fees Exoedited Plan Review 95o/o of Citv's Buildine Plan Check Fees Plan Review Engineer $rgs
ICC Certified Plans Examiner Srlo
BuildinE Official s150
CASn Consultation S13s
lombination Buildinc lnsoector Ses
3ASo lnsoection S13s
Jvertime 1.5 x Hourlv Rate
lolidavs & Weekends 2.0 x Hourlv Rate
lertified Permit Technician Szs
Fire Plans Examiner/ lnspector $us
Rli\',iliv\, 1'\'lrli / tt()t,t'] r\l.L lN(ll.tlsl\il;) Flil'l / ll()tJltl,Y ltA'l'l'l 87 Exhibit'C'
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the conhact insuranoe against claims for injuries to persons or damages to properfy which may arise from or in connection with the performanse of the work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives, or employees.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
l, Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 0l covering CGL on an "oscun€nce" basis for bodily injury and property damage, inoludingproduots- completed operations, personal iqjury and advertising injury, with limits no less than $1,0b0,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, eitherthe general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
Z Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Offrce Form NumberCA 0001 covering, Code I (any auto), Code 8 ftired) and 9 (non-owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily i4iury and property damage'
3. Workers' Compensation insurance as rcquired by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury ordisease.
4 Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance appropriates to the CONSULTANT's profcssion, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per oocurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.
If the CONSULTANT maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, CITY shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by CONSULTANT.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Starus The CITY, its oflicers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the auto policy with respect to liability arising out of automobiles owned, teased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT; and on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations porformed by or on behalf ofthe CONSULTANT including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverag€ oan be provided in the form of an endorscment to 8 88
the CONSULTANT's insurance (at lcast as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, I I 85 or both CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
Primary Coverage For any claims related to this conttact, the CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the CONSULTANT's insurancs and shall not contribute with it.
Waiver ofSubrogationCONSULTANT hereby grants to CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain any endorsemEnt that may be necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsernent from the insurer.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or sslf-insured retentions will be declared to and approved by the CITY.
Acceptability of Insurers Insurance will be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the CITY.
Claims Made Policies If any of the required policies provide coverage on a olaims-made basis:
l. The Retroactive Date will be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of conhact work.
2. CONSULTANT will maintain insurance for a minimum of three (3) years after completion of the services under this Agreement.
3, lf coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaeedwith another claims-made policy formwith a Retroactive Datepriorlo the oontract effective date, the CONSULTANT must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of Jive (5/ years after completion of contract work.
Verification of Coverage CONSULTANT shall fumish the CITY with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies ofthe applicable polioy language effecting coverage required by this clause, All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the CONSULTANT's obligation to provide them.
Subcontraetors CONSULTANT shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and CONSULTANT shall ensure that CITY is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 9 89
^A'
550 Pilgrim Drive
Foster City, CA94404
Phone: 650.522.2500
Fax: 650.522.2599
www,csgengr.com
GSG
CONSULTANTS
\r'
Employee-Owned
08/23/2024
City of Sanger
1700 7th st.
Sanger, CA 93657
Re: CSG's Compensation Schedule for 2024
Dear Mr. Brletic,
CSG Consultants is grateful for the opportunity to serve City of Sanger and its comm unity and looks forward to our continued partnership.
To uphold our commitment to providing the client with the highest level of service and achieving the expected quality standards, we will be adjusting our rates based on change in Consumer Price lndex (CPl) for the region. This change is outlined in the terms of the contract and ensures that we can attract and retain the best talent on our team, which directly contributes to the quality of work we can deliver to the client.
Starting 07 /0L/2024, our new rates will apply. The adjusted rate schedule is attached to this letter as Exhibit A, which also includes our current rates for reference.
Should you have any questions regarding the adjusted rates, please feel free to contact Crickett Brinkman, at (209)862-95 11 or crickettb(ocssensr.com.
We look forward to the continuation of our successful partnership in the coming year Sincerely,
Cyrus Kianpour, PE, PLS
President, CSG Consultants, lnc.
cc: Crickett Brinkman, CSG Consultants
Accounting Department, CSG Consultants
SANGER'10-CA21000
SAN JOSErosT(R crTY I PTEASANTON SACRAMENTO I NEWMAN I PASO ROBLTS I FRESNO I ORANGE 90 ^^'csG
CONSULTANTS
\/
Employee-Owned
Exhibit A
Fee Schedule
Effective August 1, 2024
CSG Consultants' hourly rates for its current contract, as well as adjusted rates for the coming year are provided in the table below.
Terms
All hourly rates include overhead costs including, but not limited to, salaries, benefits, Workers Compensation lnsurance, and office expenses. Should the scope of work change, or circumstances develop which necessitate special handling, CSG will notify the City prior to proceeding. On each anniversary of the contract start date, CSG will initiate a rate increase based on the change in CPI for the applicable region. CSG will invoice on a monthly basis for services rendered during the prior month. Unless otherwise agreed, payment terms are 30- days from receipt of invoice. 2 Building Plan Check by Percentage 75% of Jurisdiction's Fee 75% of Jurisdiction's Fee
CASp Consultation S148 S1s3
CASp lnspector s148 $rsE
Certified Permit Tech Sas Sao
Chief Building Official Si.76 S182
Code Enforcement Manager S170 5176
Code Enforcement Officer s100 $104
Code Enforcement Officer I S110 S114
Code Enforcement Officer ll 5L2o sL24
Combo Building lnspector s10s s10s
Expedited Review by Percentage 95% of Jurisdiction's
Fee 95% of Jurisdiction's Fee
Fire lnspector $126 S13o
ICC Licensed Plan Examiner St2t 5tzs
Plan Review Engineer S148 s1s3
Senior Code Enforcement Officer s13s s140
Structural Only Review by
Percentage
50% of Jurisdiction's
Fee 50% of Jurisdiction's Fee
Overtime 1.5 x Hourly Rate 1.5 x Hourly Rate
Holidays and Weekends 2 x Hourly Rate 2 x Hourly Rate
CURRENT
ALL INCLUSIVE FEE I
HOURLY RATE
07 lorl2o24 - o6/3O/2O2s
ALt INCLUSIVE FEE / HOURTY
RATE
REVIEW TYPE / ROLE
91 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-73
A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER APPROVING 42024.2025 F'ISCAL YEAR BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
WHERAS, the City of Sanger Annual budget requires amendments to adjust the estimated revenues and appropriations to reflect the City's financial plan; and WHEREAS' the annual budget contains the estimated revenue and appropriations necessary to implement the City Council's policies, goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, during the fiscal year, unforeseen circumstances, changed economic conditions or spending priorities may require budget adjustments; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sanger does hereby find that it would be in the best interest of the City to revise the estimated appropriations; and WHEREAS, budget amendment appropriating funds in the amount $375,000 to account 101-060-20I-6290, is necessary to cover the cost of Community Development Services.
NOW THEREFORE' IT IS HERBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Sanger as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference.
2. The Council approves the amendment to the Annual Budget as set forth in Exhibit'oA" for Revenue Adjustments and Appropriation Adjustments which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
3. The Administrative Services Director or his designated staff is hereby authorized and directed to record the appropriate accounting entries.
4. This resolution is effective upon adoption.
{. * * tr( {. * * + d. rl. {. {.'t t *
The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council for the City of Sanger, California, at a regular meeting of said Council on the 5th day of December 2024,and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN (RECUSAL): NONE
ABSENT: NONE
AITEST:
&*;t*Tanz;
Corina Tamez, Citf C lerk
92 EXHIBITA
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Scope of Services may include Building Official services, Building Inspection services, Building Construction Plan Check, Fire Construction Plan - Plan Check, Civil Engineering Plan Check, and Code Enforcement services. The services are on an as needed basis to be determined by the City.
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100
101
102
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER APPROVING A 2025-2026 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (CSG CONSULTING, INC.)
WHEREAS, the City of Sanger Annual entered into an agreement with CSG Consulting, Inc. for the provision of certain services to support the City’s Community Development Department; and WHEREAS, to ensure funding for the remainder of the fiscal year for the most recent amendment to the agreement, the City Council now desires to amend the adopted budget in the amount of $115,024.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HERBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Sanger as follows:
1. The recitals are true and correct.
2. The Council approves a budget amendment for $115,024 as set forth in Exhibit 1. The Director of Financial Services is directed to adjust the City’s Fiscal Year 2025/26 Amended Budget in the amount of the approved amendment.
3. The Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ***************
The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council for the City of Sanger, California, at a regular meeting of said Council on the 15
th day of January 2026, and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lina Martinez, City Clerk
103
Exhibit 1
City of Sanger Accounting Use Only
Fiscal Impact of Proposed Resolution and Budget Adjustment Number:
Budget Adjustment approved by Council
Resolution Number: 2025-65
Date: 8/7/2025
Reason for change in appropriation:
Re-appropriate funds for contract renewal with CSG Consulting, Inc. .
Estimated Additional Appropriations:
Fund Dept. Prgm Object Appropriation
Fund Name No. No. No. No. Amount
CSG Consulting Contract 101 060 201 6290 115,024.00$
Total Requested Appropriation: 115,024.00$
Current 2025-2026 Appropriation:
Adjusted Total Appropriation: 115,024.00$
Estimated Revenues Available:
Fund Dept. Prgm Object Est. Revenue
Fund Name No. No. No. No. Amount
Total Estimated Additional Revenue: -$
Current 2025-2026 Estimated Revenue:
Adjusted Total Estimated Revenue: -$
Signature ______________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________ Director's Signature ________________________________________________ Date: ___________________ Finance Director's Signature ______________________________________________ Date: ___________________ \\nas1\shared\Forms Templates
104
Prepared by: Amanda Champion Approved by:
REVIEW: City Manager: Finance: City Attorney:
TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION X Consent
Informational Item
Action Item
Department Report
Public Hearing
Matter Initiated by a Council Member
Other:
Continued to:
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2025
Agenda Item No.: G-8
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Amanda Champion, HR Manager
Subject: Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Sanger and Sanger Police Officers Association
Attachments: Memorandum of Understanding
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
None known.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Sanger and Sanger Police Officers Association (SPOA) for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, and authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The MOU between the City of Sanger and SPOA expired on June 30, 2025. The City’s negotiating team and representatives of the Association have participated in the formal process of negotiating terms and conditions of employment for a new MOU.
BACKGROUND:
The parties have reached agreement for a one-year MOU and Association membership ratified the tentative MOU.
105
The new MOU is attached. Listed below is a summary of changes to the MOU.
• Language Cleanup of the following sections:
o Association Rights
o Management Rights
o Hours of Work
o Vacation Sign up
o Mealtime and Rest Periods
o Overtime (FLSA language)
o Salary – Administration of Merit Increases
o Special Assignments
o Temporary Upgrade Pay
o Sick Leave
o Bereavement Leave
o Health and Life Insurance
o Shift Swap
o Anniversary Date
• Comp Time Cash Out- Moved away from limitless cash out and implemented a mandatory cash out of hours above 240.
• Salary: 2% base wage increases retro to July 1, 2025
• Additional longevity bracket – 2.5% at 20 years
• Reworking of Article 20- Career Development
• Retirement:
o Elimination of 3.65% employee cost share
o One time stipend for 3.65% retro to July 1, 2025
• Vacation
o Increase of cap from 240 to 280 in exchange for elimination of language that allowed cap to be exceeded
o Mandatory cash out of vacation hours in compliance with IRS • Holiday
o Transition away from front loading and cash out of holiday leave. Holidays will now accrue in the pay period they occur
• Uniform Allowance
o List of uniform items employees shall receive upon hire o Annual uniform allowance to be paid biweekly.
• Elimination of Language defining total compensation
• Addition of no strike clause
• One year term
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Representatives of the Association and the City’s negotiating team have negotiated terms and conditions of employment for a one-year MOU.
106
FISCAL IMPACT:
The negotiated items will result in an increase of approximately $230,000, which will be allocated to the General Fund (101), Measure S Fund (208), Local Public Safety Fund (255), SLESF/AB 3229 Fund (256), and Community Facilities District Fund (261).
ALTERNATIVES:
None.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:
If approved, the City Manager will execute the Memorandum of Understanding and the agreed upon terms and conditions will be implemented.
107
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Between
CITY OF SANGER
AND
SANGER POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026
108
2 Table of Contents
ARTICLE 1 PREAMBLE 3
ARTICLE 2 RECOGNITION 3
ARTICLE 3 SEVERANCE 3
ARTICLE 4 SOLE AGREEMENT 4
ARTICLE 5 CONCLUSIVENESS 4
ARTICLE 6 ASSOCIATION RIGHTS 4
ARTICLE 7 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 5
ARTICLE 8 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS 6
ARTICLE 9 DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 6
ARTICLE 10 HOURS OF WORK 6
ARTICLE 11 OVERTIME 10
ARTICLE 12 SALARY 12
ARTICLE 13 SPECIAL ASSIGNMENTS 13
ARTICLE 14 LONGEVITY PAY 14
ARTICLE 15 POST CERTIFICATE PAY 14
ARTICLE 16 EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM 14
ARTICLE 17 TEMPORARY UPGRADE PAY 15
ARTICLE 18 BILINGUAL PAY 15
ARTICLE 19 FIELD TRAINING OFFICER (FTO) PAY 16
ARTICLE 20 PROCESS FOR ADVANCEMENT 16
ARTICLE 21 RETIREMENT 16
ARTICLE 22 SICK LEAVE 17
ARTICLE 23 VACATION 19
ARTICLE 24 HOLIDAY LEAVE 20
ARTICLE 25 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE 21
ARTICLE 26 MILITARY LEAVE 21
ARTICLE 27 LEAVE FOR CHILD-RELATED ACTIVITIES 21
ARTICLE 28 JURY LEAVE 21
ARTICLE 29 HEALTH PLAN 22
ARTICLE 30 MEDICAL INSURANCE FOR RETIREES 22
ARTICLE 31 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 22
ARTICLE 32 LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY 23
ARTICLE 33 SHIFT SWAPS 23
ARTICLE 34 DISABILITY INSURANCE 23
ARTICLE 35 ANNIVERSARY DATE 23
ARTICLE 36 UNINTERRUPTED PROVISION OF SERVICE 23
ARTICLE 37 MUTUAL AGREEMENT 24
ARTICLE 38 TERM 24
ARTICLE 39 CLASS/COMP STUDY 24
ARTICLE 40 RECOMMENDATION OF REPRESENTATIVES 24
ARTICLE 41 SIGNATURES 25
ATTACHMENT A SALARY RANGES 26
109
3 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
SANGER POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
ARTICLE 1. PREAMBLE
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is made and entered into between the City of Sanger, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the Sanger Police Officers Association, hereinafter referred to as “ASSOCIATION,” pursuant to California Government Code, Sect ion 3500 et. seq., and City’s Employer-Employee Relations Ordinance, Article III, Chapter 46 of the Sanger City Code.
This MOU is intended to establish the rates of compensation, hours of work, and other terms and conditions of employment for all members of the Unit.
ARTICLE 2. RECOGNITION
1. City recognizes Association as the exclusive employee organization for the Unit made up of the following Sanger City Police Department classifications:
• Police Cadet
• Police Officer
• Corporal
• Police Sergeant
• Police Commander
• Records Clerk
• Records Supervisor
• Community Service Officer
• Animal Control Officer
2. This recognition does not include: provisional employees, temporary employees and part - time employees.
3. City agrees to meet, confer, consult and otherwise deal exclusively with Association on all matters within the scope of representation under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Government Code Section 3500 et. seq.) and as provided in City’s Employer -Employee Relations Ordinance.
ARTICLE 3. SEVERANCE
1. City and Association have carefully reviewed this MOU with their respective counsel and agree that it is enforceable and consistent with applicable law. Each party is reasonably relying on this representation of the other party in agreeing to this MOU. In the event any provision of this MOU should be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unconstitutional, unlawful or unenforceable, such determination shall not invalidate any of the other terms or conditions of this MOU.
110
4 2. In the event that any provision of the MOU should be found to be invalid, unconstitutional, unlawful or unenforceable, City and Association agree to meet and confer in a timely manner.
ARTICLE 4. SOLE AGREEMENT
1. The terms and conditions of this MOU constitute the primary wages, hours and working conditions applicable to the Unit. To the extent that any other agreement, City policy, regulation or ordinance is in direct conflict with this MOU, this MOU shall prevai l.
Nothing in this MOU shall be construed to abrogate, diminish or render ineffective any City employment or other policy, program, agreement or ordinance not in direct conflict with this MOU.
2. If, during the term of this MOU, the parties should mutually agree to modify, amend or alter the provisions of this MOU in any respect, any such change shall be effective only if and when it is reduced to writing and executed by the authorized representati ves of City and Association. Any such change validly made shall become part of the MOU.
3. The waiver or breach of any term or condition of this MOU shall not prevent the future enforcement of such term or condition.
ARTICLE 5. CONCLUSIVENESS
This MOU shall be conclusive as to the matters specifically and expressly set forth herein. Neither City nor Association shall institute meet and confer and/or meet and consult with respect to issues and matters specifically set forth herein without the concurrence of the other party. This provision shall not be construed to prevent City from instituting meet and confer and/or meet and consult on matters not specifically and expressly resolved in this MOU. In the event City attempts unilaterally to change a term or condition of employment which is subject to the requirement to meet and confer or meet and consult under the Meyers -Milias-Brown Act without first having invited Association to meet and confer or meet and consult on such issue, City thereafter shall not enact or adopt such term and/or condition of employment without the concurrence of Association. In the event, however, City invited Association to meet and confer or meet and consult with respect to a proposed term or condition of employment, th en City shall not be precluded thereafter from enacting or adopting such term or condition of employment at the conclusion of the meet and confer or meet and consult process, even without the concurrence of Association.
ARTICLE 6. ASSOCIATION RIGHTS
Association shall have the following rights and responsibilities:
1. To reasonable advance notice of any City ordinance, rule, resolution or regulation directly relating to matters within the scope of representation proposed to be adopted by the City Council;
2. To reasonable use of one bulletin board at the Police Department; 111
5 3. To biweekly payroll deduction for Association dues from Association members for whom the Association certifies that it has received a signed authorization for payroll deductions.
Member requests to change or cancel deductions, or any disputes concerning du es deductions, shall be directed to the Association, and not to the City. An employee’s earnings after all other legal and required deductions and any employee voluntary deductions are made must be sufficient to cover the amount of the dues or membership fees. When the employee’s earnings are insufficient (whether employee was i n a full, partial, or unpaid status), no dues or membership fees will be deducted during that pay period. The Association expressly agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses, damages or other monetary losses arising from claims made by employees for deductions made by the City in reliance on information provided by the Association.
4. To represent members of the Unit before the City Council and all agencies of City with regard to wages, hours and other matters within the scope of representation, subject to the provisions of applicable federal, state or city laws, ordinances and regulations.
5. To use City facilities for Association meetings, provided that suitable arrangements are made with appropriate City officials. Use of such facilities may be conditioned on the payment of reasonable charges to offset the cost of such use.
6. To reasonable access to employee work locations at the Police Department in order to meet with members of Unit concerning matters within the scope of representation. Such access shall not interfere with the operations of the Police Department and shall be subject to reasonable safety and security requirements.
ARTICLE 7. MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
It is understood and agreed that the City retains statutory management rights and authority to manage municipal services and the work force performing those services. It is agreed that during the term hereof, the City shall not be required to meet and conf er on matters which are solely a function of management, provided that the City meet and confer over the effects or impact of management decisions to the extent required by law. These rights include, but are not limited to, the exclusive right to determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards; to determine the nature, standards, levels, and mode of delivery of services to be offered to the public; to determine whether goods or services shall be made or provided by the City, or shall be purchased, or contracted for; to set standards of service, to determine employment standards, to direct its employees, to take appropriate disciplinary action against its employees; to relieve its employees from duty because of lack of work or for other non-disciplinary reasons; to maintain the efficiency of its governmental operations; to determine the methods, means and personnel by which City operations should be conducted; to organize its departmental structure; and to exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work.
112
6 ARTICLE 8. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS
Employees have the right to form, participate and join in activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer -employee relations, including but not limited to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.
Employees have the right to represent themselves individually in their employment relations with City, provided that in the event City enters into a MOU with an exclusively recognized employee organization, such as the within MOU, employees are deemed to have delegated to their exclusively recognized employee organization their right to represent themselves individually in their employment relations with City, and City is not obligated to meet and confer or otherwise deal with any individual employee within Unit with respect to matters within the scope of this MOU. No employee shall be interfered with, intimidated, restrained, coerced, or discriminated against by City or Association because of his/her exercise of any of these rights.
ARTICLE 9. DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
The disciplinary procedures applicable to Unit shall be governed by Chapter IX of the City of Sanger Personnel Policies and Procedures and the Public Safety Officers’ Procedural Bill of Rights Act, Government Code Section 3300 et. seq.
ARTICLE 10. HOURS OF WORK
1. 7(k) Work Period for Sworn Employees
Pursuant to section 7(k) of the FLSA, the City has adopted a 14-day work period for sworn law enforcement personnel, with an overtime threshold for FLSA purposes of 86 hours per work period. This applies to all non-exempt sworn personnel engaged in law enforcement, regardless of duty assignment or shift assignment.
2. Patrol Officers
The 3/12 work schedule will apply to Patrol Officers (police officers, corporals, and sergeants assigned to Patrol Operations) only.
a. Hours of Work
There will be two shifts that are each 12 hours in length. The first shift (Watch I) will begin at 1900 hours and end at 0700 hours. The second shift (Watch II) will begin at 0700 hours and end at 1900 hours.
b. 14 Day Work Period
During each 14-day work period, an employee will work 6 - 12-hour shifts and 1 - 8-hour shift for a total of 80 hours of paid time. A thirty (30) minute paid meal break, when available, will be included in the shift of all patrol officers assigned to 113
7 call for service positions, as defined by the department. This meal period is to be taken within the patrol officer’s assigned area or the police station, and must allow the patrol officers to respond to emergency situations.
It is agreed that the 8 -hour shift should be scheduled during hours that will meet Department needs in order to ensure that we have minimum patrol officer staffing at critical times. Critical times shall be determined by the Chief of Police or the Chief’s designee.
c. Work Weeks
One week will consist of 3 full working days (12 hours) with 4 days off. The second week will consist of 3 full working days (12 hours) and 1 short working day of (8 hours) followed by 3 days off. This pattern will continue in each 14 day work period. Any other hours worked during that work period will be compensated as overtime or comp time, unless a schedule adjustment has been previously approved by the Shift Supervisor and employee.
3. Special Assignments
Specials assignments, such as K-9 Officer, School Resource Officer, Officers assigned as Investigator (Detective), Motorcycle Officer (Traffic), or any other special assignment created by the Chief will typically work a 4/10 shift schedule at the discretion of the Police Chief and operational needs stated in writing.
4. Non-Patrol Assignments
Employees on non-patrol assignments shall be assigned to either a 5/8, 4/10, or 9/80 work schedule, at the discretion of the Police Chief and operational needs stated in writing.
Regular shifts for employees on non -patrol assignments shall normally be scheduled on weekdays (Monday to Friday).
5. Shift Assignment on Return to Patrol
Whenever an officer or supervisor returns to patrol from a special assignment, he/she will be assigned to the shift that has been vacated.
6. Sick Leave
Personnel will be required to notify the Department a minimum of one (1) hour before their shift begins if they are calling in sick and unable to report for duty. When possible, that same consideration should be given to any other type of emergency leave that is 114
8 unscheduled so that the on -duty Shift Supervisor will have time to find a replacement if required to meet minimum staffing.
7. Unscheduled Work Period
a. Unscheduled work is to be paid as overtime or comp time
8. Vacation Sign Up Schedule
a. An employee may sign up for annual vacation consisting of 2 one-week vacations or 1 vacation of two weeks, subject to approval by the division commander. All vacations prescheduled and approved at the time of vacation sign up shall not be rescinded or cancelled. All other use of vacation time is sub ject to prior approval and may be rescinded with a minimum of 48 hours’ notice at the discretion of the Police Chief and operational needs stated in writing.
b. Patrol personnel will sign up for vacation by seniority (based on date of hire).
c. Employees in the Commander classification shall not scheduled vacation at the same time or with overlapping dates without prior approval from the Police Chief.
d. Employees in the following assignments will not be considered in the Patrol vacation schedule:
Support Services Division Commander
School Resource Officer
Traffic Officer
Officers assigned as Investigators
9. School or Training Attendance
Most outside schools or training courses operate on an 8 hour day with a one -hour break for lunch. It must be agreed by an employee prior to attending an outside school or training program, that for the duration of the school or training program, including travel time, their workday shall revert to the non-shift work schedule of 8 hours plus 1 hour lunch period. It will be the responsibility of the employee wishing to attend the course and their shift supervisor to work out the scheduling differences so t hat the appropriate number of hours worked in each pay period with the least amount of scheduled disruption or use of overtime.
Every effort should be made to schedule attendance at school or training without the use of overtime for the affected employee.
10. Management Rights
Should the Chief of Police determine that the 3/12 work schedule does not meet the standards and expectations of the Police Department based upon the above criteria, he shall 115
9 meet and confer with representatives of the Sanger Police Officers Association prior to implementing any changes in the schedule.
The Chief of Police may unilaterally amend the work schedule on a temporary basis in the event of an emergency, however, shall meet and confer with the Association when practicable to do so before implementing any permanent changes in the schedule.
Alternately, the parties may agree to a different form of flex schedule as approved by the POA and Human Resources, in consultation with the Chief of Police.
The 7(k) exemption for public safety officers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) shall apply to the work schedule set forth in that Agreement. The 7(k) exemption shall expire in the event the Work Schedule is amended to eliminate the reason for the 7(k) exemption.
11. Shift Change Notification
Shift employees shall be provided at least five (5) working days advance notice of changes in their shifts unless such change is due to illness or emergency.
12. Meal Time
1. Employees in the Records classification shall receive an unpaid meal break of between thirty (30) and sixty (60) minutes, as part of their regularly assigned work schedule as determined by the Police Chief. Employees in the Records classification are relieved from duty during meal periods.
2. Meal periods shall not be taken during the first or last hour of a workday.
3. All other employees not in the Records classification may take a reasonable amount of time to eat during their shift, but shall remain on duty for the full shift with no guaranteed meal period.
13. Rest Periods
One (1) fifteen (15) minute rest period is authorized for each four (4) hours worked. Rest periods are not considered meal time and shall not be taken during the first or last hour of a work day., nor shall rest periods be combined into a longer break. Guaranteed rest period apply only to Records classification.
14. Missed Rest or Meal Periods
a. Since rest periods are paid time, nothing in this section provides for or implies any additional compensation or benefits if a rest period is not taken.
116
10 b. Since mealtime for employees in the Records classification, , is not paid time, any time the employee is not relieved from duty for a meal period will be counted as hours worked.
ARTICLE 11. OVERTIME
1. Rate (FLSA)
Employees shall be paid for overtime at the rate of time and one -half (1½) their regular rate of pay as defined in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
2. Exempt Employees
Police employees classified as “exempt employees” shall receive seventy -two (72) hours of management leave at the beginning of each fiscal year in order to help compensate such employees for extra time put in other than during the customary work week. The dates when such leave may be taken shall be at the discretion of the Police Chief. Unused management leave at the end of the fiscal year may carry over year to year; however, accrual is capped at 90 hours. Accrued and unused management leave is paid out on separation. Newly hired “exempt employees” shall receive a pro -rated number of hours based on the number of pay periods remaining in the year.
3. Timekeeping
All overtime shall be recorded and paid on the basis of 15-minute increments, such that for each full 15 minute period worked, the employee shall be compensated for one quarter hour of overtime. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an employee is required by the Chief of Police to attend schools or training during off duty times, time spent in such training shall be compensated with a one (1) hour minimum.
4. Hours Paid (MOU)
Overtime shall be paid to all non-sworn employees for hours worked over their assigned and normally scheduled eight (8), nine (9), ten (10), or twelve (12) hours worked in a day or after forty (40) hours worked in a 7-day work period.
Overtime shall be paid to all sworn employees for hours worked over their assigned and normally scheduled eight (8), nine (9), ten (10), or twelve (12) hours worked in a day or after eighty (80) hours worked in a 14-day work period.
5. Hours Worked
In addition to actual hours worked, only h olidays, vacation and sick leave shall constitute hours worked for the purpose of computing overtime.
117
11 6. Compensatory Time Off
Notwithstanding the provisions of this sec tion, employees may be granted compensatory time off for overtime credit at the discretion of the Chief of Police with due regard for the wishes of the employee. Pursuant to FLSA, public safety employees may bank compensatory time up to a maximum of 480 hours and non-public safety employees may bank compensatory time up to a maximum of 240 hours.
Only on the second pay date in December , all compensatory time in excess of 240 hours will be cashed out and paid to employees at their regular rate of pay.
7. Scheduling Compensatory Time Off
Requests to the Chief of Police , Division Commander, or the on-duty shift supervisor to use compensatory time off shall be considered with regard for the operational requirements of the Police Department upon reasonable notice to the Chief of Police , Division Commander, or the on-duty shift supervisor.
8. Call Back Pay
Employees called back to work shall be compensated at the rate of 1½ times the employee’s regular rate of pay, with a minimum of two (2) hours for each call back. Call back overtime consists of unscheduled overtime, and does not include early start, extended day or loss of a meal times.
9. Court Time Pay
Employees subpoenaed to appear in court to testify about events arising out of their employment, at a time when they are not working, shall be compensated at the rate of time and one-half (1½) times the employee’s regular rate of pay, with a minimum of three (3) hours for each required appearance in court.
10. Vacation Call Back
Employees called back to work during a regularly scheduled vacation period shall be compensated at a rate double their regular rate of pay for all times worked. Scheduled vacation shall begin at the end of the employee’s last scheduled shift prior to vacation days, and shall continue until the beginning of the employee’s first scheduled shift following vacation days.
11. On-Call (Standby) Pay
a. On-Call Assignment Policy.
118
12 On-call duty may be assigned by the Chief of Police or his/her designee. “On-call” is defined as “a period of time in addition to the normal work schedule in which an employee is required to remain available for immediate call.”
b. On-call duty requires the employee so assigned:
• To be ready to respond immediately to a call for service; • To be readily available at all hours by telephone or other agreed upon communication equipment; and
• To refrain from activities which might impair his/her ability to perform his/her assigned duties.
c. Employees who are “on-call” are considered to be “waiting to be engaged.” This provision is not intended to waive any individual rights under FLSA.
d. On-Call (Standby) Compensation
Employees required to remain available for immediate call shall be paid for fifty percent (50%) of the time they were required to be on -call, at the rate for straight time, for a maximum of four (4) hours pay for each day of on-call duty.
ARTICLE 12. SALARY
1. Association may request that the wage provisions of this MOU be reopened in the event City grants an across the board pay increase to any other City employee group during the term of this MOU.
2. Employees shall receive 5% step increases six (6) months after their hire date, and annually on their anniversary dates until they reach the maximum amount authorized for the position.
3. Employees who are promoted shall be assigned to step 1 of the new classification or to the step which provides them with a 5% base pay increase, whichever is greater.
4. Employees who are demoted shall be moved to the step in the new classification which most closely equates to their previous base pay.
5. No employee shall be paid a base salary more than the top step of their approved salary band.
6. Effective the first full pay period following Council approval of the new MOU (January 15, 2026) members shall receive a 2% base wage increase retroactive to July 1, 2025, for all employees active with the City at time of Council approval of the new MOU (January 15, 2026).
7. Unless specifically noted to the contrary, employees who become eligible to receive any special assignment premium or incentive pay described in Articles 13 through 19 of this 119
13 MOU shall begin receiving such premium as of the first day of the next full pay period following Council approval of the new MOU (January 15, 2026).
ARTICLE 13. SPECIAL ASSIGNMENTS
1. Police Investigator Premium
Employees officially assigned as Investigators shall receive 5% of base pay as additional compensation for such assignment. Such additional compensation is provided in lieu of pay for night and weekend standby duty. Investigator assignments shall be for a period of up to thirty -six (36) months and can be extended up to an additional twenty -four (24) months upon the Police Chief’s approval. Termination of such assignment upon the conclusion of such term shall not constitute punitive action under the City’ s Personnel Ordinance or the Peace Officers Bill of Rights, and shall not require an administrative or other hearing. The foregoing does not restrict the City’s management right to terminate an investigator assignment as a disciplinary measure for good cause, including for failure to adequately perform the assigned job duties.
2. Motorcycle Patrol Premium
Employees officially assigned as Moto rcycle Officer shall receive 3% of base pay as additional compensation for such assignment. Motorcycle Patrol assignments shall be for a period of up to thirty -six (36) months and can be extended up to an additional twenty - four (24) months upon the Police Chief’s approval. Termination of such assignment upon conclusion of such term shall not constitute punitive action under the City’s Personnel Ordinance or the Peace Officers Bill of Rights, and shall not require an administrative or other hearing. The foregoing does not restrict the City’s management right to terminate a Motorcycle Patrol assignment as a disciplinary measure for good cause, including for failure to adequately perform the assigned job duties.
Each employee officially assigned as Motorcycle Officer shall receive the following safety equipment upon appointment and annually thereafter: one DOT helmet, one leather motorcycle jacket, one pair motorcycle riding boots, one pair safety glasses with interchangeable light and dark lenses, one pair motor breeches, one pair winter gloves, and one pair lightweight gloves every three months.
3. K-9 Officer Maintenance Pay
Officers performing the assignment of K-9 Officer are entitled to compensation for the off- duty time spent caring for and maintaining the canine and the K-9 vehicle/unit.
The City will pay the K -9 Officer, while in custody of a canine, an additional 7 hours worked per 14-day pay period paid at the Officer’s overtime rate. The City and Association agree that this is a reasonable approximation of the average time spent by K -9 Officers caring for, grooming, feeding, exercising, following healthcare instructions, cleaning of kennel and patrol vehicle and otherwise maintaining their canine unit during off -duty 120
14 hours. The City and Association acknowledge and agree that this additional compensation is overtime compensation for extra hours worked, and not an incentive pay premium, and that it is therefore excluded when calculating an employee’s regular rate of pay for overtime purposes.
Assignment of this position is at the discretion of the Police Chief. Selection for canine assignment may not be appealed or grieved. The Police Chief or his designee has the sole discretion and authority to establish and/or modify policies and procedure s for canine assignments.
4. School Resource Officer
School Resource Officer assignments shall be for a period of up to thirty -six (36) months and can be extended up to an additional twenty -four (24) months upon the Police Chief’s approval. Assignment to School Resource Officer is not eligible for additiona l compensation for such assignment.
ARTICLE 14. LONGEVITY PAY
1. Police employees who have been employed on a full -time basis with the City for a continuous period of 10 or more years shall receive 2.5% of their regular base pay which shall be effective on the pay period following the employee’s qualifying anniversary date.
2. Police employees who have been employed on a full -time basis with the City for a continuous period of 15 or more years shall receive an additional 2.5% of their regular base pay which shall be effective on the pay period following the employee’s qualifying anniversary date.
3. Police employees who have been employed on a full -time basis with the City for a continuous period of 20 or more years shall receive an additional 2.5% of their regular base pay which shall be effective on the pay period following the employee’s qualifying anniversary date.
4. The maximum additional compensation for longevity pay is 7.5%.
ARTICLE 15. POST CERTIFICATE PAY
1. Additional compensation shall be paid to employees attaining POST certificates as follows:
a. POST Intermediate Certificate: 2.5%
b. POST Advanced Certificate: 5%
2. The maximum additional compensation for POST certificate is 7.5%.
ARTICLE 16. EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM.
121
15 1. Employees who hold an Associate of Arts (AA) degree from a college accredited in California shall be eligible for special education compensation at the rate of 2½% of base pay. Employees who hold a Bachelor of Arts or Science (AB/BS) degree from a college or university accredited in California shall be eligible for special education compensation at the rate of 5% of base pay. Education compensation shall be paid to employees at the completion of their probationary period, provided that the employee’s most recent overall performance evaluation was “satisfactory” or better. Employees who hold both an AA and Bachelors degree my not receive more than a total of 5% education pay.
2. The employees shall be entitled to tuition reimbursements in accordance with the City’s Employee Educational Reimbursement Policy.
ARTICLE 17. TEMPORARY UPGRADE PAY
1. Employees appointed to an upgraded position or higher classification in a vacant position for a limited duration shall be paid five percent (5%) more than their regular base rate of pay, or the beginning step of the salary range of the position to which they are provisionally appointed, whichever is greater, beginning on the first day of the next full pay period . An employee who merely assumes duties of a higher classification while retaining their regular position, or who shares the duties of a higher classification with other employees, will not be eligible for temporary upgrade pay.
This pay increase is not reportable for CalPERS purposes for employees who are “new” members under PEPRA.
2. Out-of-class appointments will only be authorized when a person filling a budgeted position is absent due to a leave of absence or during the recruitment of a vacant position for a permanent appointment. In accordance with Government Code section 20480, provisional appointments to a vacant position shall not exceed a total of 960 hours in each fiscal year. Employees may not work in an out -of-class capacity beyond 960 hours in a single fiscal year.
ARTICLE 18. BILINGUAL PAY
1. Employees who have passed a test showing that they are proficient in speaking Spanish , Hmong, or Punjabi in addition to English shall be entitled to additional compensation at the rate of 5% of their regular base pay. The tests to be utilized for determining Spanish , Hmong, or Punjabi speaking proficiency shall be selected by the Personnel Officer.
2. The maximum additional compensation for Bilingual Pay is 5%.
122
16 ARTICLE 19. FIELD TRAINING OFFICER (FTO) PAY
Employees assigned as Field Training Officers (FTO) shall receive 5% of base salary additional compensation only during such times as they are assigned by the Police Chief to perform field training activities, which only includes actual time spent training a designated trainee.
ARTICLE 20. PROCESS FOR ADVANCEMENT
1. Movement from Police Cadet to Police Officer shall be based on graduation from an accredited Police Academy. Unsuccessful completion of Police Academy within 24 months may result in termination.
2. Movement to Police Corporal shall be promotional with selection accomplished via a testing procedure which shall typically include a written examination, oral panel interview, and Chief’s interview. Candidates shall be notified in writing on their score for each phase of the selection process.
3. Movement to the Police Sergeant shall be open-promotional with selection accomplished via a testing procedure typically including a written examination, oral panel interview, and Chief’s interview. Candidates shall be notified in writing of their score for each step of the testing process.
4. Movement from Records Clerk I to Records Clerk II shall be based on a minimum of two (2) years’ time in service and overall satisfactory performance.
5. Movement from Community Service Officer I to Community Service Officer II shall be based on a minimum of two (2) years’ time in service and overall satisfactory performance.
6. Notwithstanding any of the above -mentioned promotional procedures, the final decision for employee promotions remains at the sole discretion of the Chief of Police.
7. If a promotional recruitment fails to produce an acceptable candidate or if there are no internal employees that meet the minimum qualifications for the promotional vacancy, the Police Chief may decide to run an open, including external recruitment.
ARTICLE 21. RETIREMENT
1. Police employees (sworn) who meet the definition of a “classic member” under PEPRA shall be enrolled in the 2% @ 50 CalPERS benefit formula. Members pay their entire member contribution . Members shall contribute an additional 3.56% of compensation in the form of cost sharing of the City’s required contribution to CalPERS under Government Code section 20516(a) for a total percentage of 12.56%. Upon adoption of this MOU by City Council (insert date), the City will begin the amendment process for the CalPERS contract to eliminate the employee cost share of 3.56%.
123
17 2. Police employees (non -sworn) who meet the definition of a “ classic member” under PEPRA shall be enrolled in the 2.5% @ 55 CalPERS benefit formula. Members pay their entire member contribution. Members shall contribute an additional 3.56% of compensation in the form of cost sharing of the City’s required contribution to CalPERS under Government Code section 20516(a) for a total percentage of 11.56%. Upon adoption of this MOU by City Council (insert date), the City will begin the amendment process for the CalPERS contract to eliminate the employee cost share of 3.56%.
3. Police employees (sworn) hired after January 1, 2013, who meet the definition of a “new member” under PEPRA, shall be enrolled in the 2.7% @ 57 CalPERS benefit plan.
Members pay their entire member contribution. In accordance with PEPRA, the member contribution shall be 50% of the normal cost rate. Members shall contribute an additional
3.56% of compensation in the form of cost sharing of the City’s required contribution to CalPERS under Government Code section 20516(a). The 3.56% cost sharing will be in addition to 50% of normal cost, even if the normal cost increases. Upon adoption of this MOU by City Council (insert date), the City will begin the amendment process for the CalPERS contract to eliminate the employee cost share of 3.56%.
4. Police employees (non -sworn) hired after January 1, 2013, who meet the definition of a “new member” under PEPRA, shall be enrolled in the 2% @ 62 CalPERS benefit plan.
Members pay their entire member contribution. In accordance with PEPRA, the member contribution shall be 50% of the normal cost rate. Members shall contribute an additional
3.56% of compensation in the form of cost sharing of the City’s required contribution to CalPERS under Government Code section 20516(a). The 3.56% cost sharing will be in addition to 50% of normal cost, even if the normal cost increases. Upon adoption of this MOU by City Council (insert date), the City will begin the amendment process for the CalPERS contract to eliminate the employee cost share of 3.56%.
5. Effective January 18, 2020, the City amended the CalPERS contract so that cost sharing would be by contract amendment under Government Code section 20516(a) so that the additional 3.56% will be cost sharing under Government Code section 20516(a). Upon adoption of this MOU by City Council (insert date), the City will begin the amendment process for the CalPERS contract to eliminate the employee cost share of 3.56%.
6. Effective the first full pay period following Council approval of the new MOU ( January 15, 2026), members shall receive a one-time stipend equal to 3.65% of base wages from July 1, 2025, to the time of Council approval of the new MOU ( January 15, 2026) for all active members at the time of Council approval.
ARTICLE 22. SICK LEAVE
1. Sick leave shall accrue each pay period based on the years of service as follows:
124
18 Years of Service Hours per pay period
0-2 2.67
2-5 3.1538
5-10 4.0655
10-15 4.5384
15+ 5.0000
2. Benefits shall be payable commencing the first day of absence due to the employee’s sickness or accident. Sick leave payments, including workers’ compensation payments, shall not exceed an employee’s normal earnings.
3. Sick leave is available only in the event of necessity for:
• The diagnosis, care or treatment of an existing health condition of, or preventive care for the employee;
• The diagnosis, care or treatment of an existing health condi tion of, or preventive care for the employee’s family member. Family member includes an employee’s child, parent, spouse, domestic partner, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, or another designated person, as defined in Labor Code section 245.5. • :If the employee or employee’s family member is a victim of a qualifying act violence as defined in Government Code Section 12945.8, subdivision (j), paid sick leave may be used to obtain or attempt to obtain relief, assistance, or services related to the qualifying act of violence, as defined in Government Code Section 12945.8, subsections (a)(3) and (b);.
4. In order to receive compensation while absent on sick leave, the employee shall notify his/her supervisor prior to the time set for beginning daily duties, or as specified by the Chief of Police. When absence is for more than three (3) consecutive work day s, the employee may be required to file a physician’s certificate or a personal affidavit with the Personnel Office stating that the employee was seen by a medical professional for care during the absence from scheduled working days. Employees shall not be required to disclose the nature of the care, reasons for seeking care, or other private health information except as required for purposes of seeking reasonable accommodations. Under normal circumstances, no physician’s certificate shall be required from an employee who has used six (6) or fewer days of sick leave during the twelve (12) months preceding said use.
5. If an employee is injured while in the performance of his/her assigned duty, the employee will receive up to one year full pay with normal increments and normal benefits without loss of annual leave or previously accrued sick leave (Labor Code Section 4850). After one year, the employee may use sick leave previously earned.
6. Employees on authorized vacation or holiday leave who become ill, or who are otherwise disabled through accident, may charge such sickness or disablement to previously accrued sick leave provided satisfactory evidence is presented to the Chief of Police indicating the total number of days to be so charged.
125
19 7. Employees may donate sick leave to other city employees who are ill or injured or otherwise unable to work and who have exhausted all accumulated leaves. Such donations will be strictly voluntary and will be on an equal dollar for dollar basis.
On retirement, employees may elect to convert unused sick leave hours to additional CalPERS service credit, if eligible pursuant to applicable CalPERS regulations and the City’s CalPERS contract.
ARTICLE 23. VACATION
1. Vacation shall accrue each pay period based on years of service as follows:
Years of Service Hours per pay period
0-2 2.93
2-5 4.00
5-10 4.769
10-15 6.615
15+ 8.461
2. Maximum accrual: 280 hours.
3. Vacation shall be scheduled according to seniority. To implement this paragraph, a vacation and holiday “time off” request sheet shall be posted following the completion of annual shift sign up each year. Said schedule, when approved by the Police Chief or his designee, shall be effective J uly 1 for the subsequent fiscal year. Requests for vacation shall be granted based upon the legitimate operating needs of the Department and shall not be unreasonably denied. Changes in the vacation schedule during the year shall be subject to approval by the Police Chief or his designee. Bumping is not permitted without the consent of all affected employees.
4. No employee shall accrue more than 280 hours of vacation at any given time. Once an employee has accrued 280 hours of vacation, no more vacation time shall accrue until the employee’s leave balance is reduced below 280 hours.
5. If an employee’s supervisor prohibits an employee from taking his/her accrued vacation , the employee shall be permitted to request time off at an alternative date within a reasonable period.
6. Legal holidays that fall during an employee’s vacation shall not be charged against the employee as vacation.
7. Employees who terminate or retire from City service shall be paid a lump sum for all accumulated vacation not to exceed 280 hours, at the employee’s base rate of pay.
126
20 8. Employees may donate vacation leave to other city employees who are ill or injured or otherwise unable to work and who have exhausted all accumulated leaves. Such donations will be strictly voluntary and will be on an equal dollar for dollar basis.
9. Each calendar year, all accrued vacation leave in excess of 180 hours will be automatically cashed out on the second pay date in December. Vacation leave cash outs shall be paid at the employee’s base rate of pay
ARTICLE 24. HOLIDAY LEAVE
1. Bargaining unit members assigned to positions that require employees to work scheduled shifts without regard for City-recognized holidays shall receive an additional 12 hours pay at the employee’s base rate for each City -recognized holiday that occurs in a given pay period. If an employee works on the holiday, whether it is a regularly scheduled shift or assigned overtime, this holiday pay shall be in addition to compensation for hours worked.
2. If two or more holidays occur in the same pay period, employees shall receive holiday pay for each of them.
3. Employees must be in paid status (working or on paid leave) on both the last scheduled workday immediately prior to the holiday(s) and on the next regular scheduled workday immediately after the holiday(s) in order to be eligible for holiday pay.
4. The City currently recognizes the following holidays:
1) New Year’s Day (January 1)
2) Martin Luther King Jr. Day (Third Monday in January) 3) President’s Day (Third Monday in February)
4) Caesar Chavez Day (March 31)
5) Memorial Day (Last Monday in May)
6) Juneteenth (June 19)
7) Independence Day (July 4)
8) Labor Day (First Monday in September)
9) Veterans Day (November 11)
10) Thanksgiving Day (Fourth Thursday in November)
11) Day after Thanksgiving
12) Christmas Day (December 25)
5. For one-time transition purposes only, if the MOU is approved after January 1, 2026, the City and bargaining unit agree that the holiday front loading will not occur on January 1, 2026, as the intent is to move forward toward earned accruals for the calendar year 2026. The last and final holiday cashouts for the accrued 2025 holidays would occur on the January 16, 2026, pay date , assuming approval of the new MOU occurs before January 16, 2026.
127
21 ARTICLE 25. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
Employees shall be entitled to bereavement leave without loss of pay or charge against accrued leave, to the extent necessary to attend funeral services, up to a maximum of forty (40) hours for each non-concurrent death in the employee’s immediate family. Immediate family means spouse, father, mother, son, daughter, sister, brother, father -in-law, mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, son- in-law, sister-in-law, brother -in-law, grandparent, grandchild, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, registered domestic partner, guardians, or ward. In all other cases, the Police Chief shall grant such leave only when, in his/her opinion, the relationship to the employee warrants such use of leave.
ARTICLE 26. MILITARY LEAVE
Military leave shall be granted in accordance with the provisions of state law. Employees entitled to military leave shall give the appointing power an opportunity, within the limits of military regulations, to determine when such leave shall be taken.
ARTICLE 27. LEAVE FOR DEPENDENT-RELATED ACTIVITIES
An employee who is a parent , step-parent, foster parent, or legal guardian of school-age children (kindergarten to grade 12) or the legal guardian or primary caregiver of a dependent adult, may take up to forty (40) hours leave per year (not to exceed eight (8) hours in a calendar month) to find, enroll, reenroll, his or her child in a school or with a licensed care provider, or to participate in the activities of the school or licensed care provider, if the employee, prior to taking the time off, gives reasonable notice to the Police Chief of the planned absence. The employee shall utilize existing vacation leave, holiday leave or compensatory time off for these planned absences. If an employee has no available vacation leave, holiday leave or compensatory time off t he employee may utilize time off without pay for this purpose to the extent made available at the discretion of the Police Chief.
ARTICLE 28. JURY LEAVE
1. Employees called as a trial juror or subpoenaed to court shall be entitled to be absent from duty during the period of such service or while necessarily being present in court as a result of such call. The employee shall be paid the difference between ful l salary and any payment received, except travel pay, for such duty.
2. Employees assigned to swing and graveyard shifts may be temporarily assigned to day shift. If the employee is released from jury duty after serving less than the amount of time equal to one shift, inclusive of meal and driving time, the employee may be re quired to report to the Police Department to serve the remainder of a shift. Such shift re - assignment shall be made by the Chief of Police with due consideration for the operational needs of the Department.
128
22 ARTICLE 29. HEALTH PLAN AND LIFE INSURANCE
1. City shall provide a Health Care Plan for members and their dependents. The Health Care Plan shall include medical and prescriptions, vision plan, dental plan, and a life insurance policy of $10,000 for each member.
2. City shall pay the entire premium for the life insurance plan, vision plan and dental plan costs. Employees shall pay $45.00 per month toward the premium for the medical and prescription plan for dependent coverage only. . Premiums are collected twice per month (24 times per year) for the month ahead (i.e. January premiums are collected fr om employee’s December paychecks).
3. Changes to the current Health Care Plan will follow a meet and confer process.
ARTICLE 30. MEDICAL INSURANCE FOR RETIREES
Employees retiring from City service in good standing under a CalPERS non-disability retirement may elect to continue coverage under the City’s group health plan at the employee’s cost, including dependent coverage.
Said coverage shall continue until such retired employee becomes eligible for MEDICARE benefits.
ARTICLE 31. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1. Upon hiring, the City shall provide each new employee with uniforms, which shall consist of the following:
• 2 pairs Class B pants
• 2 short sleeve Class B shirts with patches
• 2 long sleeve Class B shirts with patches
• 1 pair Class A pants
• 1 Class A shirt with patches
• 1 Class A hat (8 point)
• 1 Class A tie
• 1 blue training polo (embroidered with star and name) • 1 pair khaki BDU pant
• 1 outer jacket
2. Thereafter, Employees shall receive an annual uniform allowance for the care, maintenance, and replacement of uniform items as follows:
Sworn Personnel $1,500
Non-sworn Personnel $1,250
129
23 3. The uniform allowance shall be paid in twenty-six equal installments, one per pay period.
ARTICLE 32. LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY
The City Manager may grant an employee leave of absence without pay or seniority for a period not to exceed three (3) months. No such leave shall be granted except upon written request by the employee. Failure by the employee to report to duty promptly u pon expiration of the leave shall be cause for discharge. The Chief of Police may grant a leave of absence without pay for not more than one (1) calendar week. Such leaves shall be reported to the Personnel Officer.
ARTICLE 33. SHIFT SWAPS
The practice of shift swaps (absence with relief) will be permitted, subject to approval by the Police Chief or his designated representative. Shift swaps shall be rank for rank. Exceptions may be permitted only by the Police Chief. Employees mutually agreeing to a shift swap shall both sign the shift swap request form. Once a shift swap is approved, the schedule shall be modified accordingly, and those swapped shifts become the sole responsibility of the relieving officer(s).
Both employees involved in a shift swap are responsible for correctly completing their timecard(s) for the affected work periods. Repeated failure to correctly complete timecards may result in future swap requests being denied. Shift swaps shall occur within the same pay period.
ARTICLE 34. DISABILITY INSURANCE
City shall pay 75% of the cost of employees’ disability insurance plan, not to exceed $10.00 per employee per month.
ARTICLE 35. ANNIVERSARY DATE
1. Employee’s entrance-on-duty date shall be used for the purposes of vacation and sick leave accrual, and longevity pay.
2. Employees promoted or demoted shall establish a new anniversary date for the purpose of step increases. The new anniversary date shall be the effective date of the change.
3. Employees transferred shall not have their entrance-on-duty anniversary date changed as a result of such actions.
4. Notwithstanding the above, employees hired prior to July 1, 1997, shall retain their anniversary dates previously established.
ARTICLE 36. UNINTERRUPTED PROVISION OF SERVICE:
It is agreed that the continued and uninterrupted provision of service to the public is of paramount importance. Therefore, during the term of this MOU, City agrees that it will not lock out 130
24 employees, and employee unit agrees that neither the employee unit , nor any person acting on its behalf, nor any employee in a class ification represented by the employee unit , nor any combination thereof, shall cause, authorize, engage in, encourage, or sanction a work stoppage or slow down against the City, or the concerted failure to report for duty, or abstinence from the full and faithful performance of the duties of employment, including compliance with the request of another employee unit to engage in such activity.
If the City determines to its satisfaction that an employee is, or has, engaged in any activity prohibited by Paragraph 1 of Section 2 of this Article, the City may withhold that employee's wages and other City-paid benefits and/or take whatever other action it deems appropriate.
If the employee covered by this MOU or the City determines to its satisfaction that the employee unit is, or has, engaged in any activity prohibited by Paragraph 1 of Section 2 of this Article, the City may take legally available remedial action.
The employee unit recognizes the duty and obligation of its representatives and members to comply with the provisions of this MOU and to make every reasonable effort toward inducing all employees to fully and faithfully perform their duties, recognizing with City that all matters of controversy within the scope of the MOU shall be settled by the grievance procedure contained in City's Personnel Guidelines or other legally available remedies.
Nothing in this Article prejudices the position of either party regarding the legality of strikes in the State of California.
ARTICLE 37. MUTUAL AGREEMENT
The Association and City must mutually agree to any changes to this MOU.
ARTICLE 38. TERM
The term of this MOU shall commence on July 1, 2025, and remain in effect up to and including June 30, 2026. Union will deliver official Notice of Opening to City at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of this MOU.
ARTICLE 39. RECOMMENDATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
The representative of City and Association, having met and conferred in good faith, have mutually agreed to recommend to the Sanger City Council and the general membership of the Association, that this MOU be adopted and ratified and that the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions set forth herein be implemented.
ARTICLE 40. SIGNATURES
This MOU has been ratified and approved by City and Association pursuant to the recommendation of their representatives.
131
25 Executed this day of , .
City of Sanger Sanger Police Officers Association
Nathan Olson, City Manager Shaela Edwards, President
Shelline Bennett, City Counsel Tyler Roark, Vice President
132
26 ATTACHMENT “A”
SANGER POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
SALARY RANGES
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025
POSITION Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Frequency
RECORDS CLERK I 3,396 3,565 3,743 3,931 4,127 Monthly
RECORDS CLERK II 3,742 3,929 4,126 4,332 4,548 Monthly
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER 3,949 4,147 4,354 4,572 4,801 Monthly COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER I 3,949 4,147 4,354 4,572 4,801 Monthly POLICE CADET 4,246 4,458 4,682 4,916 5,161 Monthly
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER II 4,576 4,804 5,045 5,296 5,562 Monthly
POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR
(SPOA)
5,262 5,525 5,802 6,090 6,396 Monthly
POLICE OFFICER 5,550 5,827 6,119 6,425 6,746 Monthly
POLICE CORPORAL 6,119 6,425 6,746 7,084 7,437 Monthly
POLICE SERGEANT 6,746 7,084 7,438 7,810 8,200 Monthly
POLICE COMMANDER 7,758 8,146 8,554 8,981 9,430 Monthly
133
Prepared by: Approved by:
REVIEW: City Manager: Finance: City Attorney:
TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED
NO ACTION
Consent
Informational Item
X Action Item
Department Report
X Public Hearing
Matter Initiated by a Council Member
Other:
Continued to:
For the Meeting of: January 16, 2026
Agenda Item No.: G-9
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Nathan Olson, City Manager
Subject: Disclosure of concurrent representation of the South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency by the City Attorney’s law firm.
RECOMMENDATION:
By minute action, acknowledge concurrent representation.
SUMMARY:
The South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) is a Joint Powers Authority formed for the express purpose of allowing its members to exercise their individual police powers over groundwater management in a coordinated, cooperative and regional manner. The City is a n active voting member of that GSA and it holds a guaranteed seat on the GSA’s Board of Directors.
The City may withdraw from the GSA at will, and at any time , and in doing so the GSA will lose any, and all, regulatory authority over lands within the City. In other words, the GSA is only able to operate with the express cooperation and authorization of the City.
Recently, the GSA’s Board of Directors , including the City’s Board representative, appointed the City Attorney’s law firm, Aleshire & Wynder, as special water counsel for the GSA. As explained below, while the firm’s representation of both the City and the GSA is legally permissible and known. However, out of an abundance of transparency the City Attorney requested this be fully disclosed.
134
DISCUSSION:
As already mentioned, the South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) was expressly formed to allow the City to exercise its police powers in a coordinated, cooperative and regional manner with other agencies.
While the incompatible offices doctrine generally prohibits City Council members from simultaneously sitting on multiple public agency boards , that doctrine does not apply to J oint Powers Authorit ies because any potential for future conflict s is mooted by the unique legal formation. Accordingly, the City Council members may simultaneously sit on the Council and GSA board because the City has the absolute legal ability to moot any potential conflicts by simply withdrawing from the GSA, and in doing so stripping the GSA of the City’s powers. In other words, a potential future conflict is highly unlikely because the GSA is only able to operate with the express cooperation and authorization of the City.
The same legal reasoning that allows Council members to simultaneously sit on the GSA also allows the City Attorney’s firm to simultaneously act as legal counsel for both the City and the GSA. In fact, this type of concurrent representation is commonplace and there are provisions in the Brown Act which expressly allow the City Council to adjourn to closed sessions to hear items related to the GSA.
With that said, given the somewhat uniqueness of the situation for the general public and in the spirit of full disclosure , the City Attorney thought it best to fully disclose this concurrent representation, provide an opportunity for public comment and discussion on the matter as warranted, and to ensure the entire City Council was aware.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact acknowledging the representation.
ALTERNATIVES:
An alternative is to continue the item to seek the advice of independent legal counsel regarding concurrent representation.
135
Prepared by: _Greg Tarascou _ Approved by: _______________________
REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION __X_ Consent
____ Info Item
__X_ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency
____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2026
Agenda Item No.: G-10
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Greg Tarascou, Fire Chief
Subject: Out of State Travel Request
Attachments: None
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
None known.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve s the out of State travel and training for the Fir e Department Executive Assistant and Billing Clerk to attend the National Conference on Ambulance Revenue Cycle, Management and Compliance (abc360) in Las Vegas, Nevada from April 14 – 16, 2026.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The abc360 Conference is the Nation’s largest and most comprehensive educational event for ambulance industry billing, coding and compliance and administrative professionals. This is the west coast event that is the closest to Sanger. As the City has returned to ambulance billing in- house, the information obtained from these classes will be invaluable in ensuring that our staff have the most up to date knowledge on the intricacies of ambulance coding and billing.
BACKGROUND:
In the summer of 2018 the responsibility of ambulance billing was returned to the City after several decades of contracting out this service. The process of ambulance billing and working with Federal, State and private insurance companies for proper and responsible billing of patients is dynamic, with laws and statutes changing frequently, especially in the areas of compliance and patient privacy. The 136
\\nas1\shared\Forms & Templates
proposed conference will provide the training and education necessary to ensure that the administrative staff of the Fire Department have recent and relevant knowledge in ambulance billing practices.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
This training and educational event is only offered in Las Vegas on the west coast.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost for both to attend the course including flight, hotel, per diem and registration fees is $2,685.
There are sufficient funds to cover the cost of this training within the Ambulance Division budget.
ALTERNATIVES:
Do not approve the request in which case the staff will not attend the conference.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:
Upon approval the normal travel and training forms will circulate through the City Manager’s Office.
137
Prepared by: _Greg Tarascou _ Approved by: _______________________
REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION _X__ Consent
____ Info Item
_ X _ Action Item
___ _ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency
____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2026
Agenda Item No.: G-10
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Greg Tarascou, Fire Chief
Subject: Technical Service Support Agreement with Stryker Medical Attachments: Technical Service Support Agreement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
None known.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the technical support agreement between the City of Sanger and Stryker Medical and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The technical service agreement between the City and Stryker is for maintenance, servicing, inspections and battery replacements for the Fire Department’s cardiac monitor/defibrillators, the patient gurneys and related patient transportation equipment . There are currently five cardiac monitors, three Stair Chairs, four patient gurneys and four gurney loading systems . The term of this agreement starts with approval of this agreement for combined period of three years.
BACKGROUND:
The cardiac monitors/defibrillators and related patient transportation equipment that is utilized by the fire department require yearly inspections, software upgrades and preventative maintenance to keep the equipment in t op operating condition. The service agreement includes scheduled maintenance, repair services, computer software upgrades, inspections and safety checks in accordance with National Fire Protection Association guidelines along with a battery replacement program throughout the course of the agreement. In the event that an instrument is required to be shipped back to the manufacturer, Stryker 138
\\nas1\shared\Forms & Templates
agrees to either send a technician immediately out to inspect the equipment and/or provide a loaner machine so that no loss in service is incurred.
The proposed service agreement covers all of the Fire Department’s equipment that is in varying stages of warranty or within a prior service agreement that has since expired. This agreement combines the Department’s equipment into one service agreement in stead of multiple ones and ends at the end of September of 2027. From then, if desired a new contract covering all of the equipment can be done at the same time.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
The fire department does not have the necessary equipment, certifications or expertise to provide the comprehensive diagnostic servicing to these technical machines.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The technical servicing agreement for all of the listed equipment is $39,019. Funds have been budgeted within Ambulance Division to cover the cost of this service agreement.
ALTERNATIVES:
Do not accept the contract, in which case maintenance, support, and servicing will have to be done every year at Stryker Medical’s standard labor rates (less 10%), plus standard list prices for related parts, materials and batteries (less 15%), plus travel costs incurred.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:
Upon approval, the attached document will be signed and forwarded to Stryker Medical. Scheduling for inspections and testing of the cardiac equipment and patient transport systems will be done between the Fire Department and Stryker Medical.
139
Quote Summary
Delivery Address
Sold To - Shipping
Bill To Account
Name:
SANGER FIRE DEPT
Name:
SANGER FIRE DEPT
Name:
SANGER FIRE DEPT
Account #:
20191791
Account #:
20191791
Account #:
20191791
Address:
601 WEST AVE
Address:
601 WEST AVE
Address:
601 WEST AVE
SANGER
SANGER
SANGER
California 93657
California 93657
California 93657
ProCare Products:
#
Product
Description
Months
Qt
y
List Price
Discount
%
Sell Price
Total
1.0 STR-CHAIR-PROCARE
PROCARE-SVC-STAIR-CHAIR
√ P
arts, Labor, Travel √ Preventative Maintenance
24 1
$316.00
13.75%
$545.10
$545.10
2.0 POWERLOAD-PROCARE
PROCARE-SVC-POWER-LOAD
√ P
arts, Labor, Travel √ Preventative Maintenance √
Batteries Service
24 4
$2,352.00
13.75%
$4,057.20
$16,228.80
3.0 STR-CHAIR-PROCARE
PROCARE-SVC-STAIR-CHAIR
√ P
arts, Labor, Travel √ Preventative Maintenance
24 1
$316.00
13.75%
$545.10
$545.10
4.0 XPEDITION-PROCARE
PROCARE-XPEDITION-STAIRCHAIR
√ P
arts, Labor, Travel √ Preventative Maintenance √
Batteries Service
24 1
$1,191.00
13.75%
$2,054.48
$2,054.48
5.0 POWERPRO-PROCARE
PROCARE-SVC-POWERPRO
√ P
arts, Labor, Travel √ Preventative Maintenance √
Batteries Service
24 1
$1,656.00
13.75%
$2,856.60
$2,856.60
6.0 STR-CHAIR-PROCARE
PROCARE-SVC-STAIR-CHAIR
11/01/2026 - 12/31/2027
√ P
arts, Labor, Travel √ Preventative Maintenance
14 1
$316.00
13.75%
$317.98
$317.98
7.0 POWERPRO-PROCARE
PROCARE-SVC-POWERPRO
11/01/2026 - 12/31/2027
√ P
arts, Labor, Travel √ Preventative Maintenance √
Batteries Service
14 3
$1,656.00
13.75%
$1,666.35
$4,999.05
8.0 LIFEPK-FLD-PROCARE
PROCARE-SVC-LIFEPAK-FIELD-REPAIR 14
5 $2,281.00
13.75%
$2,295.26
$11,476.30
ProCare Prevent
Quote Number:
11238332
Version:
1 Division:
Medical
Prepared For:
SANGER FIRE DEPT
Rep:
Kirk Marmon
Attn:
Email:
Phone Number:
GPO:
EMS
Quote Date:
01/08/2026
Expiration Date:
02/08/2026
Contract Start:
Contr
act End:
01/01/2026
12/31/2027
1 This is not an In
voice
140
#
Product
Description
Months
Qt
y
List Price
Discount
%
Sell Price
Total
11/01/2026 - 12/31/2027
√ P
arts, Labor, Travel √ Preventative Maintenance √
Batteries Service
ProCare Total:
$39,023.41
Price Totals:
Comments/T erms/Signatures
__________________________________________________
Authorized Customer Signer (P
rinted) Date
__________________________________________________
Authorized Customer Signature Date
__________________________________________________
Purchase Order Number
__________________________________________________
Stryk
er Authorized Signature (Printed) Date
__________________________________________________
Stryker Authorized Signature Date
ProCare Prevent
Quote Number:
11238332
Version:
1 Division:
Medical
Prepared For:
SANGER FIRE DEPT
Rep:
Kirk Marmon
Attn:
Email:
Phone Number:
GPO:
EMS
Quote Date:
01/08/2026
Expiration Date:
02/08/2026
Contract Start:
Contr
act End:
01/01/2026
12/31/2027
2 This is not an In
voice
141
Service Terms and Conditions:
The Terms and Conditions outlined in this quote, as well as any resulting Customer purchase order, are governed by the Terms and Conditions specified in the Terms Addendum to ProCare Medical Quote attached hereto. However, these Terms and Conditions do not apply if the Customer and Stryker are bound by a Master Service Agreement or by a separate written agreement that governs the purchase or sale of goods and/or services.
ProCare Prevent
Quote Number:
11238332
Version:
1 Division:
Medical
Prepared For:
SANGER FIRE DEPT
Rep:
Kirk Marmon
Attn:
Email:
Phone Number:
GPO:
EMS
Quote Date:
01/08/2026
Expiration Date:
02/08/2026
Contract Start:
Contr
act End:
01/01/2026
12/31/2027
3 This is not an In
voice
142
Equipment Service Plan
Line
Item #
Model
ProCare Materials
Serial #
1.0 6251000000 PROCARE-SVC-STAIR-CHAIR 080140452
2.0 639005550003 PROCARE-SVC-POWER-LOAD 2303012700173
2.0 639005550003 PROCARE-SVC-POWER-LOAD 2303012700174
2.0 639005550003 PROCARE-SVC-POWER-LOAD 2303012700140
2.0 639005550003 PROCARE-SVC-POWER-LOAD 2209012700014
3.0 6252000000 PROCARE-SVC-STAIR-CHAIR 160539308
4.0 625705550001 PROCARE-XPEDITION-STAIRCHAIR 2312002192
5.0 6500000000 PROCARE-SVC-POWERPRO 090941354
6.0 6252000000 PROCARE-SVC-STAIR-CHAIR 2011010000190
7.0 6506000000 PROCARE-SVC-POWERPRO 170840100
7.0 6506000000 PROCARE-SVC-POWERPRO 1809003500415
7.0 6506000000 PROCARE-SVC-POWERPRO 1812003500216
8.0 99577-001957 PROCARE-SVC-LIFEPAK-FIELD-REPAIR 45227772
8.0 99577-001957 PROCARE-SVC-LIFEPAK-FIELD-REPAIR 49672696
8.0 99577-001957 PROCARE-SVC-LIFEPAK-FIELD-REPAIR 49672887
8.0 99577-001957 PROCARE-SVC-LIFEPAK-FIELD-REPAIR 49672715
8.0 99577-001957 PROCARE-SVC-LIFEPAK-FIELD-REPAIR 49672702 4 143
ProCare Services
Our ProActive approach
Your service details are:
With ProCare Services, we offer you operational and financial peace of mind through three comprehensive offerings: ProCare Preventive Maintenance, ProCare Protect and ProCare Prevent. You will have confidence in your device’s state of readiness along with these additional benefits of your service plan.
Our most inclusive service offering. All parts,
labor and travel associated for repairs of contracted
products are included in the cost of the service
agreement. This does not include replacement of
soft goods or accessories (i.e. mattresses, restraints, removable parts) and is not available for AEDs.
Stryker Medical products past their service life,
with this entitlement, will receive one maintenance
inspection annually for the duration of the service
agreement. This does not include any repair work or
any work that is part of the PM process. Additional
inspections are available for purchase.
Contracted products receive an annual PM for
the length of the service agreement. PM-only
agreements do not cover any necessary repairs
identified through the PM process. For details on
preventive maintenance, refer to applicable product
sheet. Preventive maintenance can also be done as
individual billable work.
• Additional Preventive Maintenance:
Contracted products on a PM-only contract can
receive an additional PM at the 6-month mark
for the length of the service agreement.
3800 E. Centre Avenue
Portage, MI 49002 USA
stryker.com
®
Stryker defibrillators, AEDs and LUCAS® products
with this entitlement are allowed an agreed upon
and documented number of case changes, upon
failure, during the length of the service agreement.
This is a premium, fully customizable service based
on your installed assets. This white-glove experience
is designed to complete large scale PM projects in a
short amount of time, typically within a week. Services include PM’s, product unboxing and set up, power
washing, all repair work as well as other customer or
field initiatives.
Stryker Medical products with this entitlement
can have the batteries replaced, as a one-for-one
swap, upon failure, during the length of the service
agreement.
Parts, labor and travel (PLT)
Preventive Maintenance (PM)
Case Change
Special Ops
Maintenance inspections
Battery service
Stryker or its affiliated entities own, use, or have applied for the following trademarks or service marks: LUCAS, ProCare, Stryker.
All other trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners or holders. The absence of a product, feature, or service name, or logo from this list does not constitute a waiver of Stryker’s trademark or other intellectual property rights concerning that name or logo. 08/2025
E C-GSNPS-BROC-2126150_REV-0_en_us Copyright © 2025 Stryker 144
Addendum to Medical ProCare Quote (Rev.7.7.25)
ADDENDUM TO PROCARE MEDICAL QUOTE
This Addendum (“Addendum”) is entered into by and between the facility listed on the Quote (“Customer”) and Stryker Sales, LLC, acting through its Medical Division (“Stryker”) and modifies the ProCare Medical Quote (“Quote”). The terms of this Addendum will apply to Customer’s purchase of Services as outlined in the Quote for Service. In the event of a conflict or inco nsistency between the Quote and this Addendum, relative to Service, this Addendum will govern.
1. Effective Date and Term. The term of this Addendum shall be coterminous with the Quote (“Term”).
2. Service. Stryker will perform the repair and maintenance services as described in the Quote (collectively, the “Services”) to the Equipment set forth on the Quote (“Equipment”).
3. Service Terms and Conditions. Services will be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Addendum.
4. Product Maintenance. Customer is required to adhere to the routine maintenance instructions provided by Stryker, its equipment and operations manuals, and accompanying labels and/or inserts for each item of Equipment. Customer covenants and agrees that its appropriate user personnel will follow the instructions and contents of those manuals, labels and inserts.
5. Warranty and Limitations of Warranty. During the Term, Stryker warrants, with the exception of software maintenance services, the following:
a. Stryker has the experience, capability and resources to perform th e Services, and Stryker further represents and warrants that the Services will be performed in a workmanlike manner and with professional diligence and skill; b. Services will comply with all applicable laws and regulations and all applicable standards set forth by law or ordinance or established by the rules and regulations of any federal, state or local agency, department, commission, association or pertinent governing, accrediting or advisory body, including The Joint Commission having authority to set standards for healthcare facilities; c. If the Services are to be performed on Customer’s premises, Stry ker represents and warrants that Stryker will comply with all a pplicable safety laws and Customer’s then current safety and other applicable regulations, all human resource policies and health and drug and alcohol screening policies; provided that Customer has provided advance written notification of such rules, regulations and policies to Stryker; d. Stryker currently has, or prior to the commencement thereof, will obtain, pay for, and maintain any and all licenses, fees, and qualifications required to perform the Services.
e. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES SET FORTH HEREIN ARE THE ONLY
WARRANTIES APPLICABLE TO THE SERVICES AND ARE EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER WARRANTY BY STRYKER,
AND STRYKER HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL OTHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES REGARDING
THE SERVICES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MERCHANTABILITY, NON-INFRINGEME NT OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
6. Limitation of Liability . EXCEPT FOR THIRD PARTY DAMAGES RELATED TO STRYKER’S INDEMNITY OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE SECTION HEREOF ENTITLED “INDEMNIFICATION,” STRYKER’S LIABILITY ARISING UNDER THIS ADDENDUM WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF SERVICE FEES PAID UNDER THIS ADDENDUM DURING THE TW ELVE (12) MONTH PERIOD IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE DATE THE CLAIM AROSE. IN NO INSTANCE WILL STRYKER BE LIABLE TO CUSTOMER FOR INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, SPECI AL, COVER, EXEMPLARY, MULTIPLIED OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ATTORNEYS’ FEES OR COSTS FOR ANY ACTIONS UNDER OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT.
7. Customer Obligations. Customer will use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with Stryker in connection with Stryker’s performance of the Services. Customer understands and acknowledges that Stryker employees will not provide surgical or medical advice, will not practice surgery or medicine, will not come in physical contact with the patient, will not enter the “sterile field” at any time, and will not direct equipment or instruments that come in contact with the patient during surgery. Customer’s personnel will refrain from requesting Stryker employees to take any actions in violation of these requirements or in violation of applicable laws, rules or regulations, Customer policies, or the patient’s informed consent. A refusal by Stryker employees to engage in such activ ities will not be a breach of this Addendum. Customer consents t o the presence of Stryker employees in its operating rooms, where applicable, in order for Stryker to provide Services under Addendum and represents that it will obtain all necessary consents from patients.
8. Limitations and Exclusions from Service. Notwithstanding any other provision set forth herein, the Services not covered under this Addendum as determined by Stryker in its sole discretion are as follows: (a) abnormal wear or damage caused by reckless or intentional m isconduct, abuse, neglect or failure to perform normal and routine maintenance as set out in the applicable maintenance manual or operating instr uctions provided with the Equipment; (b) catastrophe, fire, flood or act(s) of God; (c) damage resulting from faulty maintenance, improper storage, repair, handling or improper use (including use of non-Stryker accessories or co nsumables), damage and/or alte ration by non-Stryker-authorized personnel; (d) equipment on which any original serial number s or other identification marks have been removed or destroyed; (e) damage caused as a result of the use of the Equipment beyond the useful life, if any, specified for such equipment in the user manual; (f) service Stryker cannot perform because the Equipment has been discontinued or its pa rts have been discontinued or made obsolete; (g) service to the Equipment if the E quipment or the Equipment site is contaminated with potentially infecti ous and/ or biohazardous substances; (h ) Equipment that has been repaired or used with any unauthorized or non-Stryker components or by an unauthorized or non-Stryker third party; or (i) any Services provided by the Stryker Medical division do not include batteries (unless stated in Stryker's quote), mattresses, disposable items, IV poles or rust or corrosi on damage; Customer agrees to provide personal protective equipment (“PPE”) to OnSite/Clinical Specialists. Notwithsta nding anything else in this Addendum in the event Customer fails to provide appropriate industry-standard PPE to all OnSite Specialists, as determined in Stryker’s sole discretion, then Stryker may immediately, in its sole discretion: (i) suspend the OnSite Specialist Coverage until Customer provides such PPE; or (ii) t erminate the applicable Service.
9. Indemnification. Stryker shall indemnify Customer from any third party liability and/or damages which Customer suffers directly as a result of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Stryker or its employees or agents in the course of providing Services. The foregoing indemnification will not apply to any liability arising solely from: (i) an injury or damage due to the negligence of any person other than Str yker’s employee or agent; (ii) the failure of any person other than Stryker’s empl oyee or agent to follow any instructions outlined in the labelin g, manual, and/or 145
Addendum to Medical ProCare Quote (Rev.7.7.25)
instructions for use of the Equipment; (iii) the use of any equipment or part not purchased from Stryker or any equipment or any part thereof that has been modified, altered or repaired by any person other than Stryker’s employee or agent; or (iv) any actions taken or omissions made by any Stryker employee while under the direction or control of Customer’s staff. Customer agrees to hold Stryker harmless from and indemnify Stryker for any claims or losses or injuries arising from (i)-(iv) above resulting from Customer’s or its employees’ or agents’ actions.
10. Insurance. Stryker shall maintain the following insurance coverage during the Term: (i) commercial general liability insurance, includin g coverage for products and completed operations liability, with limits of $1,000,000.00 per oc currence and $2,000,000.00 annual aggregate applying to Stryker’s liability for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage; (ii) automobile liability insurance with a combined single limit of $1,000,000.00 each accident covering Stryker’s use of owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles; and (iii) worker’s compensation insurance as required by applicable law subject to statutory limits and employer’s liabil ity insurance with limits of $1,000,000.00 each accident and/or $1,000,000.00 each employee and policy limit for disease covering Stryker’s employees. At Customer’s written request, certificates of insurance shall be provided by Stryker prior to commencement of the Services at any premises owned or operated by Customer. Notwithstandi ng any other requirements within this Addendum to the contrary, to the extent allowed by applicable law or regulation, Stryker shall be perm itted to meet the above insurance requirements through a program of self-insurance.
11. Confidentiality. Stryker and Customer: (i) shall hold in confidence this Addendu m and any information and materials which are related to the business of the other or are designated as proprietary or confidential, herein or ot herwise, or which a reasonable person would consider to be proprietary or confidential information; and (ii) hereby covenant that they shall not disclose such information to any third pa rty without prior written authorization of the one to whom such information relate s. The rights and remedies available to a Party hereunder shall not limit or preclude any other available equ itable or legal remedies. Notwithstanding, nothing in this section shall prevent the disclosur e of records or information as required by the California Public Records Act, Brown Act, judicial proceeding, or law.
12. Non-Solicitation and Non-Hire. Customer agrees that, during the Term and for a period of one (1) year following Service, it will not solicit any employees of Stryker to terminate their employment with Stryker, unless Stryker consents in writing.
13. Background Check. Stryker warrants that all of its employees who will be on a Customer’s premises to perform Services will have undergone a criminal background check as part of Stryker’s hiring practice. The background check c onsists of the following:
a. Education verification, which includes a review of employee’s submitted educational institutions to ensure proper accreditation; b. Employment history verification;
c. SSN trace, including address history verification;
d. OFAC Watch List search, including a search of global terrorist and national drug trafficker lists; e. FDA Debarment and Disqualified/Restricted List search; f. OIG/HHS Exclusion List check;
g. EPLS/GSA Exclusion List check;
h. Criminal history search, including a National Criminal Database (NCD) search and a national sex offender registry search and a search of all jurisdictions where the employee has lived or worked during the last seven years; and i. Motor vehicle check
During the Term, a Customer may request a meeting with Stryker to review the performance, behavior or expectations of Stryker service personnel who are assigned to provide service at Customer’s facility. Any Stryker service personnel who willingly and knowingly violate Customer’s rules, regulations, procedures, or policies may be removed from Customer’s facility at Customer’s option and will be replaced by Stryker promptly.
14. Independent Contractor. The relationship between the Parties is that of independent contractors. It is mutually agreed that Stryker is at all times acting and performing as an independent contractor with respect to Customer, and nothi ng is intended nor shall be construed to create an employer/employee relationship between Stryker and Customer. It is agreed that any person employed by Stryker to perform hereunder shall not be deemed to be an employee of Customer, and Stryker and Stryke r’s employees, agents or representatives shall not be, or represent themselves to be, officers, employees, agents or representatives of Customer.
15. Miscellaneous. No Party shall be liable for failure of or delay in performing obligations set forth in this Addendum, and no Party shall be deemed in breach of its obligations, if such failure or delay is due to natural disasters or any causes reasonably beyond the control of such Party. This Addendum shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan and the Parties consent and ag ree that any and all litigation arising from this Addendum will be conducted by state or federal courts located in the State of Michigan. Th is Addendum shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, Customer and Str yker and their respective successors and assigns. Neither Party m ay assign any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party. Any purported assignment i n violation of the preceding sentence will be void. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties concerning the subject mat ter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior negotiations and agreements between the Parties concerning the subject matter of this Addendum. In the event of an inconsistency or conflict between this Addendum and any purchase order, i nvoice, or similar document, this Addendum will control. The sections entitled Warranty and Limitation of Warranties, Indemnification, Limitation of Liability, Confidentiality and Miscella neous of this Addendum shall survive its termination or expiration.
************************************************************************************************************************ 146
PURCHASE ORDER FORM
Does the Customer require a PO# on invoices for payment?
No
Y es
If yes, do not use this form.
Check box confirming BILL TO and SHIP TO on quote is accurate.
Customer # - 20191791
Company Name
SANGER FIRE DEPT
Contact or Dept
Phone
Stryker Quote #
Grand Total Amount
11238332
$39,023.41
Authorized Customer:
Pr
inted Name: _____________________________________
Title: _____________________________________ Signature: _____________________________________
Date: _____________________________________
Check box if anything attached
*Sales or use tax
es on domestic (USA) deliveries will be invoiced in addition to the price of the goodsand services on the Stryker Quote.*
*Service Terms and Conditions:
The Terms and Conditions outlined in this quote, as well as any resulting Customer purchase order, are governed by the Terms and Conditions specified in the Terms Addendum to ProCare Medical Quote attached hereto. However, these Terms and Conditions do not apply if the Customer and Stryker are bound by a Master Service Agreement or by a separate written agreement that governs the purchase or sale of goods and/or services 8 147
Prepared by: Esperanza Rosales____ Approved by: __Esperanza Rosales_________________
REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO
ACTION
____ Consent
____ Info Item
_X__ Action Item
_X__ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency
____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2026
Agenda Item No.: H-1
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Esperanza Rosales, Public Works Director
Subject: Review and Acceptance of the City of Sanger – Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report
Attachments: 1) Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None known.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the City Council, by motion, accept the City of Sanger - Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report conducted by AM Consulting Engineers and authorize the Public Works Director or designee to submit the report and proposed updated local limits to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for review and approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Sanger contracted AM Consulting Engineers to conduct a comprehensive local limit study.
This study was federally and state mandated to update the City’s outdated industrial discharge limits ensuring that industrial pollutants do not interfere with the treatment process, cause the City to violate its Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs), or contaminate biosolids.
148
BACKGROUND
The City of Sanger contracted with AM Consulting Engineers to conduct a comprehensive local limit study. The City of Sanger operates two separate wastewater treatment facilities:
• Domestic WWTF: Operating under Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) R5-2014-0004. • Industrial WWTF: Operating under Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) 98-131 The City’s Industrial Pretreatment Program is mandated by federal and state regulations (40CFR 403) to ensure industries do not discharge pollutants that could:
• Interfere with the Wastewater Treatment Facility treatment processes. • Cause the City to violate its WDR permit limits or water quality standards. • Contaminate biosolids (sludge) or impact public health and safety.
Local Limits
Local Limits are specific pollutant concentration limits set by the City for industrial discharges into the sanitary sewer system. They are the primary tool used to protect the treatment facilities, the environment, and public health. The City’s previous local limits were outdated. This comprehensive study was required and conducted using current monitoring data and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance to update them.
Study Objectives
The Study was performed with the following key objectives:
• Evaluate Existing Conditions: Assess current wastewater pollutant loading at both the Domestic and the Industrial Treatment Facilities.
• Determine Capacity: Establish available treatment capacity based on current WDR design criteria. • Update Pollutant Limits: Develop new industrial discharge limits that:
o Protect each facilities treatment performance.
o Maintain compliance with state and federal regulations. o Preserve capacity for future industrial and residential growth.
Development of Local Limits
The development process involved two distinct phases:
Phase I: Evaluation of WDR-Based Local Limit
This phase focused on pollutants regulated by the City’s current WDRs. • Domestic WWTF Evaluation: The analysis centered on Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Electrical Conductivity (EC). Recent sampling data from the plant and collection system were used to partition the load between residential and industrial sources. The findings were compared against the facility’s design capacity to confirm available capacity and develop updated industrial limits that remain within WDR compliance. • Industrial WWTF Evaluation: A similar approach was used, comparing monitoring data to the facility’s design flow and treatment capacity, particularly focusing on the strength of wastewater from major industries.
149
Phase II: Evaluation of Local Limits Using EPA Guidance This phase applied the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance (2004) to evaluate additional Pollutants of Concern that may affect: treatment performance, biosolid quality, and receiving water quality. The process involved:
• Identifying Pollutants of Concern not directly regulated by the WDR’s (e.g metals). • Determining pollutant removal efficiency at each facility. • Calculating Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings (MAHLs) the highest pollutant load that can enter the facility without causing interference or environmental harm. • Using the most conservative MAHL results to recommend protective local limits.
Development of Local Limits
The study recommends the following updated local limits for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTF’s, derived from the WDR, facility design data, and EPA guidance:
Comparison of Existing and Proposed Local Limits
Pollutant Existing Local
Limit(1)
Industrial WWTF Domestic WWTF
Proposed
Local Limit
Required
Local Limit
Proposed
Local Limit
Required
Local Limit
Arsenic 1.0 mg/L 0.012 mg/L No 0.22 mg/L No
Cadmium 0.7 mg/L 0.006 mg/L No 0.11 mg/L No
Chromium 1.0 mg/L 0.05 mg/L No 0.93 mg/L No
Copper 1.0 mg/L 0.058 mg/L Yes 0.03 mg/L Yes
Cyanide 1.0 mg/L 0.015 mg/L Yes 0.25 mg/L No
Lead 0.4 mg/L 0.006 mg/L Yes 0.07 mg/L No
Mercury 0.01 mg/L 0.002 mg/L No 0.03 mg/L No
Nickel 1.0 mg/L 0.081 mg/L No 1.53 mg/L No
Silver 0.7 mg/L 0.00 mg/L No 0.00 mg/L No
Zinc 1.0 mg/L 0.343 mg/L Yes 2.71 mg/L Yes
Molybdenum None 0.024 mg/L No 0.45 mg/L No
Selenium 2.0 mg/L 0.009 mg/L Yes 0.04 mg/L Yes
BOD5 300 mg/L 1,000 mg/L Yes 500 mg/L Yes
Total Suspended Solids 300 mg/L 600mg/L Yes 500 mg/L Yes Ammonia 0.32 mg/L 27 mg/L No 327 mg/L Yes
EC 700 µmhos/cm 700 µmhos/cm Yes 1,000 µmhos/cm Yes
pH 6.5 – 8.5 6.0 – 9.0 Yes 6.0 – 9.0 Yes
FOG 100 mg/L 100 mg/L Yes 100 mg/L Yes
Note:
(1)Existing Local Limit are detailed in Section 82-175 of the City of Sanger's Municipal Code and pertain to both the Industrial and Domestic WWTFs.
150
The proposed limits are essential for several key reasons: they are necessary to protect each facility’s treatment performance and long-term reliability, required to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, serve to fairly allocate capacity between residential and industrial users, and preserve sufficient treatment capacity for future growth.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
To establish Implementation Plan (Regulatory Submittal and Ordinance Amendment) to ensure legal compliance, financial responsibility, and infrastructure longevity.
FISCAL IMPACT
Acceptance is a crucial step in sound fiscal stewardship, primarily generating benefits through cost avoidance and long-term asset protection.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not accept the report and provide staff with further direction, although not recommended.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The Public Works Department will submit the Local Limit Evaluation Report to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for approval and subsequently prepare the necessary ordinance amendments. 151
ATTACHMENT 1
152
DRAFT
AM Consulting Engineers, Inc. − 5150 N Sixth Street, Suite 124 − Fresno, CA 93711 − P: 559.473.1371 − F: 559.513.8449
CITY OF SANGER
INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL LIMITS EVALUATION
DRAFT
October 2025
Prepared by:
153
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Table of Contents
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 2
1.1. Need for Local Limits ..................................................................................................................... 2
1.2. Facility Description ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.2.1. Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility ............................................................................ 3
1.2.2. Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility ............................................................................ 3
1.3. Industrial Dischargers ................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 - LOCAL LIMIT DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................... 5
2.1. Pollutants of Concern .................................................................................................................... 5
2.2. EPA POCs ....................................................................................................................................... 5
2.3. Waste Discharge Requirements POCs .......................................................................................... 6
2.4. Other Reasons for POCs ................................................................................................................ 7
2.4.1. Water Quality Criteria ........................................................................................................... 7
2.4.2. Biosolids Land Application Criteria ....................................................................................... 7
2.4.3. Interference and Inhibition Criteria ...................................................................................... 7
2.4.4. Protection of Treatment Works, Collection System, and Workers ....................................... 8 SECTION 3 - DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL DISCHARGE LIMITS ......................................................................... 9
3.1. Evaluation of WDR-Based Local Limits .......................................................................................... 9
3.1.1. Domestic WWTF Local Limit Development ........................................................................... 9
3.1.2. Industrial WWTF Local Limit Development ........................................................................ 11
3.2. Evaluation of Local Limits Using EPA Guidance .......................................................................... 13
3.2.1. WWTF Removal Efficiencies ................................................................................................ 14
3.2.2. Allowable Headworks Loadings .......................................................................................... 15
3.2.3. Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ......................................................................... 25
3.2.4. Designating Local Limits ...................................................................................................... 27
3.2.5. Background Loadings for Non-Industrial Sources ............................................................... 28
3.2.6. Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings ............................................................................ 29
3.2.7. Local Limits Allocation ......................................................................................................... 32
3.2.8. Industrial WWTF – Evaluation of Local Limits ..................................................................... 32 154
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Table of Contents
iii
3.2.9. Domestic WWTF – Evaluation of Local Limits ..................................................................... 33 SECTION 4 - Proposed Local Limits ............................................................................................................. 35
4.1. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Limits .............................................................................. 35
4.2. Recommended Action and Conclusion ....................................................................................... 36
APPENDIX A RESIDENTIAL BACKGROUND SAMPLING
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 EPA POCs ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2-2 Domestic WWTF WDRs POCs ........................................................................................................ 6 Table 3-1 Evaluation of Current Values ........................................................................................................ 9 Table 3-2 Domestic WWTF Design Loadings and Allocations ..................................................................... 10 Table 3-3 Domestic WWTF Proposed Industrial Local Limits and Spare Capacity ...................................... 11 Table 3-4 Industrial WWTF Current Influent Conditions (2024) ................................................................. 12 Table 3-5 Industrial WWTF Design, 2024 Influent Loadings, and Spare Capacity ...................................... 12 Table 3-6 Industrial WWTF Proposed Industrial Local Limits and Spare Capacity...................................... 13 Table 3-7 Summary of Removal Efficiencies ............................................................................................... 14 Table 3-8 Industrial WWTF – Water Quality Standard AHLs ...................................................................... 17 Table 3-9 Domestic WWTF – Water Quality Standard AHLs ....................................................................... 18 Table 3-10 Industrial WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs ................................................ 19 Table 3-11 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs ................................................ 19 Table 3-12 Industrial WWTF – Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs ............................................... 21 Table 3-13 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs ............................................... 22 Table 3-14 Industrial WWTF – Activated Sludge and Nitrification Inhibition Based AHLs ......................... 23 Table 3-15 Domestic WWTF – Activated Sludge and Nitrification Inhibition Based AHLs ......................... 24 Table 3-16 Industrial WWTF – Summary Inhibition Based AHLs ................................................................ 24 Table 3-17 Domestic WWTF – Summary Inhibition Based AHLs ................................................................ 25 Table 3-18 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ................................................ 25 Table 3-19 Domestic WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ................................................ 26 Table 3-20 Industrial WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings ........................ 27 Table 3-21 Domestic WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings ........................ 27 Table 3-22 Estimated Background Loadings from Non-Industrial Sources ................................................ 29 155
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Table of Contents
iv
Table 3-23 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings ................................................... 30 Table 3-24 Domestic WWTF – Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings ................................................... 31 Table 3-25 Industrial WWTF – Uniform Allocation of Local Limits ............................................................. 33 Table 3-26 Domestic WWTF – Uniform Allocation of Local Limits ............................................................. 33 Table 4-1 Comparison of Existing and Proposed Local Limits ..................................................................... 35 156
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Abbreviation
v
ABBREVIATIONS
AHL
ACGIH
BOD
EC
EPA
HDPE
MAHL
µmhos/cm
MGD
mg/L
NIOSH
OSHA
lbs/day
PWTW
SIU
TSS
VOC
WDR
WWTF
Allowable Headworks Loading
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Electrical Conductivity
Environmental Protection Agency
High-Density Polyethylene
Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading
Micromhos per Centimeter
Million Gallons per Day
Milligram per Liter
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Occupational Health and Safety Administration
Pounds per Day
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
Significant Industrial User
Total Suspended Solids
Volatile Organic Compound
Waste Discharge Requirements
Wastewater Treatment Facility
157
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 1 – Introduction
2 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
1.1. Need for Local Limits
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) serve a crucial role in regulating the type and volume of pollutants introduced into municipal wastewater systems. These regulations are essential for protecting treatment facilities from operational disruptions, preventing the pass -through of contaminants, maintaining water quality in the underlining groundwater and receiving streams, preserving sludge integrity, and ensuring worker safety. Additionally, POTWs must effectively manage conventional pollutants to maintain compliance with permit limits while ensuring the long -term efficiency of their systems.
To regulate the discharge of toxic and conventional pollutants from non -domestic sources, POTWs establish and enforce Pretreatment Standards, commonly referred to as local limits. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) outlines the recommended approach for developing these limits in its Local Limits Development Guidance (2004).
The City of Sanger (City) owns and operates two separate wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs): a Domestic WWTF and Industrial WWTF. These facilities serve residential, commercial, and industrial users within the City’s service area and are located on adjacent properties southeast of the City limits. Each WWTF operates with independent collection, treatment, and disposal systems and is regulated under separate Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) issued by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
This Local Limits Study was prepared to evaluate and establish pollutant discharge limitations for both the City of Sanger’s Domestic and Industrial WWTFs. The purpose of the Study is to ensure that non-domestic discharges do not interfere with the performance of the WWTF’s , hinder the safe disposal or reuse of biosolids, or cause violations of the effluent limitations and groundwater protection requirements specified in the respective WDRs. Accordingly, this Study evaluates discharge limits for each facility based on its design capacity to treat specific pollutants such as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), electrical conductivity (EC), and fats, oils, and grease (FOG). Where facility-specific design limits are not defined for a pollutant, local discharge limits are established using procedures outlined in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Local Limits Development Guidance (July 2004).
1.2. Facility Description
The City of Sanger operates two separate WWTFs, each serving different segments of the community’s wastewater system. These facilities are regulated under distinct WDRs and differ in their treatment processes, effluent disposal methods, and the nature of incoming wastewater. The following subsections provide detailed overviews of each facility, including design capacity, key infrastructure, operational practices, and influent characteristics. This foundational information supports the evaluation of pollutant loadings and the development of technically appropriate local limits specific to each facility’s configuration and regulatory obligations.
158
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 1 – Introduction
3 1.2.1. Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility
The Domestic WWTF is regulated under Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) Order No. R5-2014-0004.
The facility includes a headworks with a grit chamber, two primary clarifiers, an activated sludge unit, secondary clarifiers, a sludge thickener, an anaerobic digester, a Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) unit, centrifuge, and a sludge holding tank. Although a disinfection system is installed, it is not currently in operation. Treated effluent is conveyed through a 20 -inch PVC pipeline to the Lincoln Ponds, a 120 -acre City-owned property with six percolation ponds. Each pond covers approximately nine acres, providing a combined storage capacity of 328 acre-feet. Three ponds are actively used for effluent disposal, while the remaining two are reserved for emergency use. The WWTF is designed to treat an average dry -weather flow of 3.0 million gallons per day (MGD). From 2021 through 2024, the facility treated an average influent flow of approximately 1.67 MGD.
Per WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004, the design influent average annual BOD and TSS concentrations are 224 mg/L and 226 mg/L, corresponding to 5,604 pounds per day (lbs/day) and 5,655 lbs/day, respectively.
In comparison, influent data collected in 2024 indicat ed an average annual flow of 1.80 MGD, with BOD and TSS concentrations of 243 mg/L and 272 mg/L, representing loadings of 3,649 lbs/day and 4,079 lbs/day. The average EC concentration in 2024 was 777 µmhos/cm, equating to approximately 11,651 lbs/day. Unde r the WDR, the maximum allowable EC in the discharge may not exceed the weighted average of the source water plus 500 µmhos/cm. Based on monitoring of the City’s ten groundwater supply wells, the weighted average EC of the source water was 281 µmhos/cm, es tablishing a discharge limit of 781 µmhos/cm.
The Domestic WWTF primarily receives wastewater from residential and commercial sources within the City, along with contributions from four industrial users: Initiative Foods (private -label baby food manufacturer), International Paper (corrugated packaging producer), Pitman Family Farms (chicken hatchery), and GBI USA Co. (pet treat manufacturer . While none of these users currently meet the definition of a Significant Industrial User (SIU), their discharges may contain pollutants that affect treatment performance or effluent quality. Accordingly, this Study evaluates the combined contributions of industrial and non-industrial sources to determine whether local limits are necessary for specific POCs.
1.2.2. Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility
The Industrial WWTF operates under WDR Order No. 98 -131 and is designed to treat up to 1.3 MGD of wastewater generated primarily by Pitman Farms and Gibson Winery. From 2021 through 2024, the WWTF received an average influent flow of approximately 0.842 MGD, with a 30 -day maximum daily average of approximately 1.07 MGD.
The treatment process includes headworks with dual aerated grit chambers, three mechanically aerated treatment ponds, one aerated storage pond, and three non-aerated storage ponds. The treatment ponds are lined with soil cement, and the storage ponds are lined with synthetic liners to minimize percolation.
Treated effluent is applied to 116 acres of adjacent farmland via flood or furrow irrigation at agronomic rates. The facility also has provisions to utilize a shared clarifier and filter system, operated in coordination with the Domestic WWTF, for additional treatment when necessary. Sludge that accumulates in the 159
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 1 – Introduction
4 treatment ponds is removed at the discretion of a local grower and land-applied for agricultural purposes on City-owned reclamation fields. The City does not oversee sludge removal or application activities but conducts mid-year monitoring to assess solids accumulation levels.
Consistent with the Domestic WWTF, WDR Order No. 98 -131 specifies that influent EC shall not exceed the weighted average EC of the source water plus 500 µmhos/cm. Based on monitoring of the City’s groundwater supply wells, this establishes an influent EC limit of 781 µmhos/cm. Unlike the Domestic WWTF, the Industrial WWTF’s WDR does not prescribe numeric effluent limitations for BOD or TSS.
Instead, design values identified in a 1995 Black & Veatch memorandum specify maximum month daily average concentrations of 3,360 mg/L BOD and 760 mg/L TSS, corresponding to 36,429 lbs/day and 8,240 lbs/day, respectively. By comparison, influent monitoring conducted in 2024 indicated a 30-day maximum daily average flow of 0.993 MGD, with average BOD and TSS concentrations of 1,160 mg/L. The average EC influent concentration in 2024 was 1,015 µmhos/cm, equivalent to approximately 8,403 lbs/day.
The Industrial WWTF exclusively receives wastewater from Pitman Farms and Gibson Winery, both of which have been designated by the City as SIUs. Their discharges contain elevated levels of BOD, TSS, and EC that can significantly affect treatment performanc e and effluent quality. Accordingly, this Study evaluates pollutant contributions from these SIUs relative to facility design capacity and regulatory requirements to determine whether local limits are warranted for POCs.
1.3. Industrial Dischargers
The City of Sanger provides sewer service to residential, commercial, and industrial users within its service area. A dedicated industrial sewer system conveys wastewater exclusively from two SIUs: Gibson Winery and Pitman Farms. Gibson Winery, a producer of table and dessert wines, discharges primarily during the grape crush season, with peak flows typically occurring between August and October. Pitman Farms, a poultry processing facility, generates wastewater on a relatively consistent basis unlike Gibson Winery.
The volume, strength, and variability of these industrial discharges have the potential to introduce elevated pollutant loadings, particularly BOD, TSS, EC and FOG, that may impact treatment performance, regulatory compliance, and the ability to manage biosolids in accordance with state and federal standards.
For these reasons, a careful evaluation of pollutant contributions from both SIUs is critical to protecting the Industrial WWTF.
The Domestic WWTF, in contrast, receives flows from residential neighborhoods, commercial establishments, and several small -scale industrial sources , as detailed in Section 1.2.1 . Although the industrial users are currently not designated by the City as SIUs, their discharges can still affect treatment plant performance by influencing operational efficiency, effluent quality, and compliance with WDR Order No. R5-2014-0004.
To address these potential impacts, this Study evaluates pollutant loading from both industrial and non- industrial sources to determine whether local limits are necessary at each facility. The following sections outlines the methodology used to identify and assess POCs. This evaluation establishes the technical foundation for developing defensible local limits that protect the treatment capacity and operational integrity of both WWTFs, ensure ongoing compliance with applicable WDRs, and safeguard public health, water quality, and the environment.
160
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 2 – Pollutants of Concern
5 SECTION 2 - LOCAL LIMIT DEVELOPMENT
2.1. Pollutants of Concern
The development of local limits is critical to ensuring the efficient operation of the publicly owned treatment works (POTW), protecting worker health and safety, preventing the discharge of harmful pollutants into the environment, and maintaining the qual ity of treated sludge. These limits also play a key role in ensuring compliance with discharge permits and aligning with federal, state, and local regulatory requirements. To achieve these goals, it is essential to identify and regulate POCs that have the potential to disrupt wastewater treatment processes, compromise effluent quality, or pose environmental and public health risks.
POCs are pollutants that require monitoring and control to safeguard the wastewater treatment facility, its operators, the integrity of the collection system, and the proper disposal of treated effluent and biosolids. These pollutants can contribute to pas s-through contamination, interfere with treatment processes, damage infrastructure, or affect a facility’s ability to manage and dispose of biosolids in compliance with environmental standards.
The following sections outline the criteria for determining whether a pollutant should be classified as a POC. While multiple factors may justify the inclusion of a pollutant on this list, its designation as a POC does not necessarily mean that a local limit must be established. The need for local limits is evaluated in Section 4, where a thorough assessment is conducted. If a pollutant is identified as a POC, data collection and a detailed analysis must be carried out to determine the appropriate regulator y and treatment measures needed to mitigate its impact.
2.2. EPA POCs
The EPA has designated 15 key pollutants t hat are commonly present in wastewater treatment plant effluent and biosolids. These pollutants are classified as POCs due to their potential to impact treatment processes, effluent quality, and biosolid management. As part of any local limits evaluation, these pollutants must be assessed to determine their potential risks and the need for regulatory controls. A comprehensive list of these pollutants is provided in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 EPA POCs
Pollutant
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Molybdenum
161
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 2 – Pollutants of Concern
6 Table 2-1 EPA POCs
Pollutant
Selenium
BOD5
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Ammonia
2.3. Waste Discharge Requirements POCs
While federally regulated pollutants remain a primary focus, both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs are also subject to locally established pollutant control measures that account for site -specific regulatory requirements and environmental conditions. For the Domestic WWTF, WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004 establishes effluent limitations and monitoring requirements for discharges to the onsite effluent disposal ponds. Pollutants with enforceable effluent limits under the WDR are therefore designated as POCs for this Study. Table 2 -2 presents these POCs and the corresponding most stringent effluent limitations established by the WDR.
Table 2-2 Domestic WWTF WDRs POCs
Pollutant Discharge Limitation
BOD5 (mg/L) 40
TSS (mg/L) 40
EC
1,000 umhos/cm or source
water plus 500 umhos/cm,
whichever is less
As detailed in Section 1.2.1, WDR Order No. R5-2014-0004 also defines design influent loading criteria of 224 mg/L BOD and 226 mg/L TSS, which correspond to 5,604 lbs/day and 5,655 lbs/day, respectively, at the facility’s design flow of 3.0 MGD. These design concentrations provide the technical basis for evaluating headworks loadings and will be applied in this Study to determine appropriate local limits for the Domestic WWTF.
Similar to the Domestic WWTF, the Industrial WWTF is also regulated under WDR Order No. 98-131 with a discharge limitation for EC, which may not exceed the weighted average EC of the source water plus 500 µmhos/cm. Based on 2024 monitoring of the City’s ten groundwater supply wells, the weighted average EC of the source water was 281 µmhos/cm, resulting in an effluent EC limit of 781 µmhos/cm for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs.
Unlike the Domestic WWTF, WDR Order No. 98 -131 does not prescribe numeric effluent limitations for BOD or TSS at the Industrial WWTF. Instead, design values identified in a 1995 Black & Veatch Memorandum provide the most appropriate benchmarks for local limits development. These design criteria specify maximum month daily average influent concentrations of 3,360 mg/L BOD and 760 mg/L TSS. At the design flow of 1.3 MGD, these concentrations correspond to loadings of 20,760 lbs/day BOD and 4,686 lbs/day TSS. Accordingly, this Study applies the maximum month daily average concentrations for BOD and TSS, in conjunction with the facility’s design flow, to establish applicable local limits for the Industrial WWTF.
162
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 2 – Pollutants of Concern
7 2.4. Other Reasons for POCs
In addition to pollutants identified by federal and state regulations, certain pollutants may be classified as POCs due to their potential to impact wastewater treatment operations, environmental quality, or regulatory compliance. The evaluation of these a dditional POCs ensures that the City of Sanger’s wastewater treatment facilities can effectively manage both municipal and industrial discharges while maintaining compliance with their respective WDRs and other applicable regulatory standards.
2.4.1. Water Quality Criteria
One key factor in determining POCs is water quality criteria. Effluent from the WWTF is discharged into evaporation/percolation ponds, and any pollutants present in significant concentrations may affect groundwater quality and environmental health. Polluta nts with the potential to exceed water quality objectives or contribute to groundwater contamination must be evaluated to determine whether they require local limits.
2.4.2. Biosolids Land Application Criteria
Sludge and biosolids generated at the City of Sanger’s wastewater treatment facilities are managed in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations to ensure safe handling, disposal, and protection of public health and the environment. At the Do mestic WWTF, sludge is periodically removed from treatment units to maintain operational efficiency and is either disposed of at a permitted landfill, land - applied, or processed through other approved reuse methods. These activities are conducted in accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2014-0004, Title 40 CFR Part 503, and relevant California regulations.
Management of sludge within the treatment and storage ponds is performed by a local grower, who removes and land-applies the material on City-owned reclamation fields for beneficial reuse on a periodic basis. The City does not perform or direct these activities but conducts mid -year inspections to evaluate solids buildup and maintain compliance with operational requirements.
To maintain compliance, both WWTFs must prevent the discharge of industrial pollutants that could compromise sludge quality or result in violations of applicable disposal regulations. The national standards under 40 CFR Part 503 establish pollutant concent ration limits, operational standards, management practices, and requirements for sampling, recordkeeping, and reporting. These standards are designed to mitigate risks to human health and the environment associated with biosolids use or disposal.
The State of California has adopted the federal 40 CFR Part 503 standards and imposes additional land application restrictions under Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. As such, pollutants regulated under these frameworks are evaluated as POCs to ensure biosolids generated at the WWTFs remain compliant with all applicable state and federal criteria for safe disposal or land application.
2.4.3. Interference and Inhibition Criteria
The EPA’s pretreatment regulations outlined in 40 CFR 403.5(a) require the prohibition of industrial discharges that could cause interference at the WWTF’s. According to the EPA, interference occurs when a discharge inhibits or disrupts the treatment process, resulting in a violation of the WWTF’s WDRs or biosolids disposal requirements. To prevent such disruptions, the EPA recommends that pollutants with a history of causing interference be classified as POCs.
Although some pollutants may not lead to effluent violations or biosolids disposal issues, they can still negatively impact WWTF operations by disrupting biological treatment processes or affecting overall 163
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 2 – Pollutants of Concern
8 system performance. The EPA Local Limits Development Guidance provides information on pollutants that have inhibition concentrations for various treatment plant processes. Identifying and monitoring these pollutants is essential to ensuring that influent characteristics remain within acceptable operational thresholds, thereby preventing disruptions to treatment efficiency and regulatory compliance.
2.4.4. Protection of Treatment Works, Collection System, and Workers Explosive and flammable pollutants pose a significant risk to the integrity of the sewer collection system and the health and safety of WWTF workers. Under certain conditions, the accumulation of these substances can lead to fires or explosions, endangerin g facility operations and personnel. If industrial users are expected to discharge such pollutants, establishing local limits may be necessary to mitigate these risks and ensure safe system operation.
In addition to combustion hazards, fume toxicity levels of specific pollutants can have severe health implications for WWTF workers. Volatile organic compound (VOC) vapors are of particular concern, as they may be toxic, carcinogenic, and capable of causing chronic health effects after prolonged or repeated exposure. The EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance outlines concentration thresholds for hazardous airborne contaminants based on standards set by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). If industrial discharges contain these pollutants at levels that could endanger workers, local limits may be required to protect both worker safety and treatment facility operations.
164
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
9 SECTION 3 - DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL DISCHARGE LIMITS
After identifying POCs for the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs (Tables 2 -1 and 2 -2) and compiling necessary sampling data, local discharge limits can be established for each facility. For pollutants directly regulated by the applicable WDRs, including BOD, TSS, and EC, local limits are based on the facility’s design capacity and effluent limitations specified in the WDRs. For pollutants without defined facility -specific design values, local limits are developed in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency’s Local Limits Development Guidance , ensuring consistent protection of treatment capacity, effluent quality, and receiving environments.
3.1. Evaluation of WDR-Based Local Limits
The following section evaluates the local limits for the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs that are specifically derived from their WDRs, focusing on BOD, TSS, and EC as the key regulated parameters.
3.1.1. Domestic WWTF Local Limit Development
For the Domestic WWTF, the local limits for BOD, TSS, and EC were derived directly from the design criteria established in WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004. Table 3-1 presents the evaluation of current values using 2024 influent monitoring data, domestic sampling data collected from lift stations, and the average daily flow contributed by industrial users discharging to the facility. These calculations provide a breakdown of pollutant contributions between domestic and industrial sources.
Table 3-1 Evaluation of Current Values
Pollutant
2024 Domestic WWTF Influent Domestic Influent Industrial Influent Calculated Flow
(MGD)
Conc.
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Conc.
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Conc.
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
BOD5 1.80 243 3,649 1.71 205 2,921 0.089 984 728
Total Suspended
Solids 1.80 272 4,079 1.71 209 2,973 0.089 1,495 1,106
EC 1.80 777 11,651 1.71 724 10,320 0.089 1,798 1,331
At the average influent flow of 1.80 MGD, the WWTF received wastewater with an average BOD concentration of 243 mg/L, a TSS concentration of 272 mg/L, and an EC of 777 µmhos/cm in 2024. While the City’s Domestic WWTF primarily treats wastewater from residential and commercial sources, the facility also receives flows from four permitted industrial users. According to the City, the combined average daily discharge from these industries is 0.089 MGD. Subtracting this amount from the total influent flow yields a domestic flow of 1.71 MGD.
To characterize domestic contributions, the City collected composite samples at two lift stations that do not receive any industrial flows. The average concentrations from those sampling locations, shown in Table 3-1, represent the domestic influent values used in this evaluation. Industrial contributions for BOD, TSS, and EC were then calculated by subtracting the domestic influent loadings (expressed in lbs/day) from the total WWTF influent loadings. This approach provides an estimate of the pollutant loa dings attributable to industrial discharges, ensuring that the resulting local limits reflect both actual operating conditions and the design basis of the facility.
165
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
10 The Domestic WWTF is designed to treat an average daily flow of 3.0 MGD with design influent concentrations of 224 mg/L BOD, 226 mg/L TSS, and 781 µmhos/cm EC. At 3.0 MGD, these concentrations correspond to design loadings of 5,604 lbs/day BOD, 5,655 lbs/day TSS, and 19,533 lbs/day EC. Given that the current domestic flow is approximately 1.71 MGD, the City projects domestic flows will increase by about 35 percent, reaching approximately 2.63 MGD at buildout. The remaining portion of the 3.0 MGD design flow, approximately 0.37 MGD, is therefore allocated to industrial users.
Table 3-2 presents the corresponding design loadings for BOD, TSS, and EC, along with the estimated division of capacity between residential and industrial sources.
Table 3-2 Domestic WWTF Design Loadings and Allocations Pollutant
Domestic WWTF Design
Flow
(MGD)
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
WWTF
Total
Loading
(lbs/day)
Residential
Loading
(lbs/day)(1)
Industrial
Loading
(lbs./day)(2)
BOD5 3 224 5,604 4,494 1,111
Total Suspended Solids 3 226 5,655 4,574 1,081
EC 3 781 19,533 15,877 3,656
Notes:
(1)Residential Loading values were calculated by applying the current pollutant concentrations (Table 3-1) to the estimated residential flow capacity of 2.63 MGD. (2)Industrial Loading values represent the remaining portion of the total WWTF design loading, determined as the difference between the WWTF Total Loading and the Residential Loading.
Using the estimated design flow rate and loadings allocated to industrial users determined in Table 3-2, the appropriate local limits for BOD, TSS, and EC at the Domestic WWTF can now be established. Table 3- 3 presents the proposed industrial local limits and the corresponding spare design capacity. Spare capacity represents the remaining industrial loading available after applying the proposed limits and was calculated by subtracting the proposed industrial loading (expressed in lbs/day at 0.089 MGD) from the total industrial allocation defined by the facility’s design capacity. For example, the Domestic WWTF is designed to accommodate 1,111 lbs/day of industrial BOD. At the proposed local limit of 500 mg/L and an industrial flow of 0.089 MGD, existing users would contribute approximately 370 lbs/day, leaving 741 lbs/day unused capacity. This margin ensures that the facility can absorb fluctuations in industrial loading and still remain within design specifications. The same calculation was applied to TSS an d EC, yielding spare capacities of 711 lbs/day and 2,916 lbs/day, at the proposed limit of 500 mg/L and 1,000 µmhos/cm, respectively.
166
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
11 Table 3-3 Domestic WWTF Proposed Industrial Local Limits and Spare Capacity Pollutant
Available Design
Capacity Proposed Local Limit Spare Design
Capacity
Industrial
Flow
(MGD)
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
Industrial
Flow
(MGD)
Industrial
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
Industrial
Flow
(MGD)
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
BOD5 0.37 1,111 0.089 500 370 0.178 741
Total Suspended Solids 0.37 1,081 0.089 500 370 0.170 711 EC 0.37 3,656 0.089 1000 740 0.350 2,916
In addition to pollutant-specific spare capacity, the proposed limits allow the City to accept approximately
0.170 MGD of additional industrial flow, nearly double the current industrial contribution of 0.089 MGD.
This demonstrates that the proposed limits not only protect the WWTF’s treatment performance and compliance with WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004 but also preserves sufficient capacity to accommodate reasonable future industrial growth.
The proposed local limits are ultimately consistent with the WWTF’s WDRs and design capacity, keeping industrial discharges within the established treatment and disposal capabilities of the Domestic WWTF.
The concentrations proposed for BOD, TSS, and EC are achievable for industrial users, while also providing a conservative margin that protects the facility’s biological treatment processes, compliance with effluent limitations, and long -term operational reliability. In addition, mai ntaining a substantial p ortion of the industrial allocation as spare design capacity preserves flexibility for existing and future industrial contributors and reduces the risk of noncompliance. Together, these factors ensure that the proposed limits balance operational protection , regulatory requirements, and equitable allocation of treatment capacity between residential and industrial users.
3.1.2. Industrial WWTF Local Limit Development
For the Industrial WWTF, design criteria for BOD, TSS, and EC are derived from WDR Order No. 98 -131 and the 1995 Black & Veatch design memorandum, which establishes the governing design flow and loading capacities used in developing proposed local limits. The facility is designed to treat an average daily flow of 1.3 MGD. According to records from 2021 to 2024, the WWTF received an average influent flow of 0.842 MGD, while the 30-day maximum daily average reached approximately 1.07 MGD. In 2024, the 30 -day maximum daily average was 0.993 MGD. Wastewater discharges from Pitman Farms are relatively consistent, while discharges from Gibson Winery are seasonal and vary with production cycles.
Accordingly, the evaluation of proposed local limits is based on the 30-day maximum daily average rather than the overall average daily flow.
Table 3 -4 summarizes influent monitoring data for the Industrial WWTF during 2024. At a 30 -day maximum daily average flow of 0.993 MGD, wastewater received from Pitman Farms and Gibson Winery contained an average BOD concentration of 1,160 mg/L, equivalent to 9,606 lbs/day. TSS average 477 mg/L, or 3,951 lbs/day, while EC average 1,015 µmhos/cm, corresponding to 8,403 lbs/day. These values establish the WWTF’s current operating conditions and provide the basis for comparison with the facility’s design capacity.
167
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
12 Table 3-4 Industrial WWTF Current Influent Conditions (2024) Pollutant Flow
(MGD)
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
BOD5 0.993 1,160 9,606
Total Suspended Solids 0.993 477 3,951
EC 0.993 1,015 8,403
As previously stated, WDR Order No. 98-131 does not prescribe numeric effluent limitations for BOD or TSS. Instead, design values from the 1995 Black & Veatch memorandum establish maximum month daily average concentrations of 3,360 mg/L BOD₅ and 760 mg/L TSS, equivalent to 36,429 lbs/day and 8,240 lbs/day, respectively, at the design flow of 1.3 MGD. For EC, WDR Order No. 98-131 specifies that influent shall not exceed the weighted average EC of the source water plus 500 µmhos/cm. Based on groundwater monitoring of the City’s supply wells, this requirement translates to an influent EC limit of 781 µmhos/cm, or 8,468 lbs/day.
Table 3 -5 compares these design flow and loading capacities with actual influent monitoring data collected in 2024. The difference between the design allocation and observed loadings defines the available spare capacity for each pollutant. Results show substantial reserves for BOD (26,823 lbs/day) and TSS (4,289 lbs/day), but a minimal margin for EC (64 lbs/day). This comparison demonstrates that while the facility can accommodate additional organic and solids loadings, EC is operating near its design threshold and therefore requires more careful management in establishing local limits.
Table 3-5 Industrial WWTF Design, 2024 Influent Loadings, and Spare Capacity Pollutant
WWTF Design WWTF Influent (2024 Data)
Spare
Capacity
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
lbs/day
Loading
(lbs/day)
BOD5 1.3 3,360 36,429 0.993 1,160 9,606 26,823
Total Suspended Solids 1.3 760 8,240 0.993 477 3,951 4,289 EC 1.3 781 8,468 0.993 1,015 8,403 64
Table 3-6 outlines the proposed industrial local limits for BOD, TSS, and EC at the Industrial WWTF. The proposed limits are expressed as concentrations at the full design flow of 1.3 MGD and translated to equivalent mass loadings in lbs/day. The spare design capacity shown represents the remaining pollutant loading that the facility could accept beyond the proposed limits, thereby maintaining a margin of safety for variability in industrial discharges and potential future growth. 168
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
13 Table 3-6 Industrial WWTF Proposed Industrial Local Limits and Spare Capacity Pollutant
WWTF Design Proposed Local Limit Spare Design Capacity
Flow
(MGD)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Conc.
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Loading
(lbs/day)
BOD5 1.30 36,429 1.30 1,000 10,842 3.07 25,587
Total Suspended Solids 1.30 8,240 1.30 600 6,505 0.35 1,735 EC 1.30 8,468 1.30 700 7,589 0.15 878
As shown, the proposed limits preserve substantial spare capacity for BOD (25,587 lbs/day) and TSS (1,735 lbs/day), ensuring that the facility can continue to accommodate increases in organic and solids loadings without exceeding design parameters. However, the margin for EC is more limited (878 lbs/day), highlighting the need for careful monitoring and management of salinity to maintain compliance with WDR Order No. 98-131 In terms of flow, the most restrictive spare capacity is associated with EC, which allows for an additional 0.15 MGD of industrial discharge. This value represents the maximum additional flow the facility can reliably accept without surpassing its design allocation for EC . Collectively, these proposed limits align with the facility’s design criteria and protect treatment performance.
3.2. Evaluation of Local Limits Using EPA Guidance
While the previous section focused on pollutants regulated under the Domestic and Industrial WWTF’s WDRs, this approach does not address all pollutants that may impair treatment plant operations, biosolids quality, or affect downstream water quality. To establish comprehensive and defensible local limits, this Study also applies the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Local Limits Development Guidance.
Under this methodology, treatment plant removal efficiencies are quantified and evaluated alongside factors such as water quality standards, biosolids disposal requirements, and process inhibition thresholds. These evaluations are used to calculate Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings (MAHLs), which represent the maximum pollutant loading that can be introduced to a WWTF without causing pass- through, interference, or violations of applicable regulatory standards. The following procedures are used to establish MAHLs for each POC at the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs:
1. Determine the WWTF-specific removal efficiencies for each POC, based on representative influent and effluent data;
2. Calculate the Allowable Headworks Loadings (AHLs) using environmental criteria applicable to each facility, such as Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs), water quality standards, biosolids disposal limits, and biological inhibition thresholds;
3. Identify the MAHL as the lowest (most conservative) of the calculated AHLs to ensure adequate protection of treatment processes, receiving waters, sludge management practices, and worker safety.
This section presents the application of the EPA guidance to the City’s Domestic and Industrial WWTFs.
The results provide the technical foundation for determining whether additional local limits are warranted beyond those imposed by WDRs and ensure that industrial discharges are protective of public health, water quality, and the long-term operational integrity of the City’s treatment facilities. 169
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
14 3.2.1. WWTF Removal Efficiencies
At both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs, POCs are monitored to evaluate treatment performance and demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. At the Industrial WWTF, monitoring focuses on EC and BOD because of their significance to salinity management and organic loading strength. At the Domestic WWTF, monitoring also includes TSS, as required by the facility’s WDRs. As discussed in Section
3.1, BOD, TSS, and EC have already been evaluated under applicable WDRs and the facility’s design capacity and are not reassessed here under the EPA methodology.
At the Domestic WWTF, ammonia is also a POC that is routinely monitored, and sufficient site -specific data are available to calculate removal efficiency. However, aside from ammonia, the City does not collect paired influent and effluent data for the other POCs identified in Table 2 -1. In these cases, pollutant removal efficiencies were assigned using the default values provided in Appendix R of the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance. These default values represent typical removal rates for activa ted sludge systems and are widely recognized as appropriate for developing technically defensible local limits.
By incorporating both site-specific data where available and EPA-recommended default values where data are lacking, the City can calculate MAHLs for each POC in a manner consistent with federal guidance, while ensuring protection of treatment processes, bi osolids quality, and receiving water standards. Table 3 -7 summarizes the pollutant removal efficiencies applied for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs.
Table 3-7 Summary of Removal Efficiencies
POCs
Industrial WWTF
Removal
Efficiency
Domestic WWTF
Removal
Efficiency
Arsenic(1) 45% 45%
Cadmium(1) 67% 67%
Chromium(1) 82% 82%
Copper(1) 86% 86%
Cyanide(1) 69% 69%
Lead(1) 61% 61%
Mercury(1) 60% 60%
Nickel(1) 42% 42%
Silver(1) 75% 75%
Zinc(1) 79% 79%
Molybdenum(1) 63% 63%
Selenium(1) 50% 50%
Ammonia(2) 0% 34%
Notes:
(1)Priority pollutant percent removal efficiencies through activated sludge treatment as recommended by the 2004 USEPA Local Limits Guidance.
170
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
15 Table 3-7 Summary of Removal Efficiencies
POCs
Industrial WWTF
Removal
Efficiency
Domestic WWTF
Removal
Efficiency
(2)For the Industrial WWTF, no effluent data results available to calculate removal efficiency.
3.2.2. Allowable Headworks Loadings
After quantifying pollutant removal efficiencies for the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs, the next step in the local limits development process is to calculate AHLs. AHLs represent the maximum pollutant loadings that can be introduced to a treatment facility without causing pass-through, interference, or violations of applicable environmental criteria. These criteria include state and federal water quality standards, sludge disposal limitations, and biological process inhibition thresholds. By evaluating AHLs for POC, the City can determine the level of influent loading that each facility can reliably accept while ensuring protection of groundwater quality, biosolids management, and treatment system performance. The following subsections present the calculated AHLs for both facilities, categorized by water quality, sludge disposal, and inhibition-based criteria.
3.2.2.1. Water Quality Standard
For POCs without enforceable permit limits , the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance recommends calculating AHLs using state or federal water quality standards. These standards may be based on aquatic life protection criteria for both acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) exposure, or on human health protection criteria such as drink ing water consumption, recreational use, or fish ingestion.
Although the WDRs for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs do not authorize surface water discharges, they require that all discharges remain protective of underlying groundwater basin, as this groundwater is designated for municipal and domestic supply, agricultural supply, and industrial service supply. Accordingly, in developing local limits, the water quality standards applied must be consistent with these designated beneficial uses. For POCs with applicable water quality criteria, AHLs are calculated using the methodology presented in Equation 1.
Equation 1 – AHL based on Water Quality limits:
AHL𝑊𝑄 =
(8.34)[(𝐶𝑊𝑄) ∗ (𝑄𝑆𝑇𝑅+𝑄𝑊𝑊𝑇𝐹) − (𝐶𝑆𝑇𝑅 ∗ 𝑄𝑆𝑇𝑅)]
1 − 𝑅𝑊𝑊𝑇𝑃
Where:
AHLWQ = AHL based on water quality criteria, lb/day
CWQ = State or Federal water quality standard, mg/L
CSTR = Receiving stream background concentration, mg/L
QWWTF = WWTF average flow rate, MGD
QSTR = Receiving stream (upstream) flow rate, MGD
171
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
16 RWWTF = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal
8.34 = Conversion factor
Using Equation 1, t he individual chronic, acute, agricultural, and human health AHLs for each pollutant have been consolidated into a single summary table for each facility, presented in Tables 3-8 and 3-9. 172
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
17 Table 3-8 Industrial WWTF – Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
WWTF
Flow
(MGD)
(QWWTF)
Receiving
Stream
Flow
(MGD)
(QSTR)
Receiving
Stream
Conc.
(mg/L)
(CSTR)
Water Quality Standard (mg/L) (CWQ)
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable Headworks Loading (lbs/day)
Chronic(1) Acute(1) Agricultural(2) Human
Health(1) Chronic Acute Agricultural Human
Health
Arsenic 0.71 0 0.01 0.15 0.34 0.1 0.01 45% 1.628 3.691 1.086 0.109 Cadmium 0.71 0 0.00 0.0022 0.0043 0.01 0.005 67% 0.039 0.077 0.179 0.090 Chromium 0.71 0 0.00 0.01 0.016 0.1 0.01 82% 0.362 0.526 3.290 0.329 Copper 0.71 0 0.23 0.009 0.013 0.2 1.3 86% 0.381 0.550 8.460 54.987 Cyanide 0.71 0 0.00 0.0052 0.022 - 0.15 69% 0.099 0.420 - 2.865 Lead 0.71 0 0.03 0.0025 0.065 5 0.015 61% 0.038 0.987 75.919 0.228 Mercury 0.71 0 0.00 0.00077 0.0014 - 0.002 60% 0.011 0.021 - 0.030 Nickel 0.71 0 0.01 0.052 0.47 0.2 0.1 42% 0.531 4.799 2.042 1.021 Silver 0.71 0 0.00 - 0.0034 - - 75% - 0.081 - -
Zinc 0.71 0 0.24 0.12 0.12 2 - 79% 3.384 3.384 56.397 - Molybdenum 0.71 0 0.003 - - 0.01 - 63% - - 0.160 -
Selenium 0.71 0 0.01 0.005 - 0.02 0.05 50% 0.059 - 0.237 0.592 Ammonia 0.71 0 5.70 - - - 30 0% - - - 177.650
Notes:
(1)National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Priority Pollutants as reported in Appendix D of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance. (2)California water quality-based assessment thresholds published by the State Water Resources Control Board at the following website:
www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/water_quality_goals. 173
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
18 Table 3-9 Domestic WWTF – Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
WWTF
Flow
(MGD)
(QWWTF)
Receiving
Stream
Flow
(MGD)
(QSTR)
Receiving
Stream
Conc.
(mg/L)
(CSTR)
Water Quality Standard (mg/L) (CWQ)
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable Headworks Loading (lbs/day)
Chronic(1) Acute(1) Agricultural(2) Human
Health(3) Chronic Acute Agricultural Human
Health
Arsenic 1.80 0 0.003 0.15 0.34 0.1 0.01 45% 4.122 9.342 2.748 0.275 Cadmium 1.80 0 0.000 0.0022 0.0043 0.01 0.005 67% 0.100 0.195 0.454 0.227 Chromium 1.80 0 0.005 0.01 0.016 0.1 0.01 82% 0.916 1.332 8.327 0.833 Copper 1.80 0 0.059 0.009 0.013 0.2 1.3 86% 0.964 1.392 21.413 139.183 Cyanide 1.80 0 0.003 0.0052 0.022 - 0.15 69% 0.251 1.064 - 7.253 Lead 1.80 0 0.002 0.0025 0.065 5 0.015 61% 0.096 2.498 192.165 0.576 Mercury 1.80 0 0.000 0.00077 0.0014 - 0.002 60% 0.029 0.052 - 0.075 Nickel 1.80 0 0.005 0.052 0.47 0.2 0.1 42% 1.344 12.146 5.169 2.584 Silver 1.80 0 0.003 - 0.0034 - - 75% - 0.204 - -
Zinc 1.80 0 0.229 0.12 0.12 2 - 79% 8.565 8.565 142.751 - Molybdenum 1.80 0 0.003 - - 0.01 - 63% - - 0.405 -
Selenium 1.80 0 0.007 0.005 - 0.02 0.05 50% 0.150 - 0.600 1.499 Ammonia 1.80 0 832.86 - - - 30 34% - - - 677.643
Notes:
(1)National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Priority Pollutants as reported in Appendix D of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance. (2)California water quality-based assessment thresholds published by the State Water Resources Control Board at the following website:
www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/water_quality_goals.
174
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
19 Table 3-10 presents the summary of water quality -based AHLs for the Industrial WWTF. The most restrictive (i.e., lowest) calculated AHL for each POC is selected as the final AHL to ensure protection of water quality objectives.
Table 3-10 Industrial WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Chronic)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Acute)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Agricultural)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Human Health)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Water Quality)
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 1.63 3.69 1.09 0.11 0.11
Cadmium 0.04 0.08 0.18 0.09 0.04
Chromium 0.36 0.53 3.29 0.33 0.33
Copper 0.38 0.55 8.46 54.99 0.38
Cyanide 0.10 0.42 - 2.87 0.10
Lead 0.04 0.99 75.92 0.23 0.04
Mercury 0.01 0.02 - 0.03 0.01
Nickel 0.53 4.80 2.04 1.02 0.53
Silver - 0.08 - - 0.08
Zinc 3.38 3.38 56.40 - 3.38
Molybdenum - - 0.16 - 0.16
Selenium 0.06 - 0.24 0.59 0.06
Ammonia - - - 177.65 177.65
Table 3-11 presents the summary of water quality-based AHLs for Domestic WWTF. As with the Industrial WWTF, the most conservative AHL value for each POC is identified and selected to maintain compliance with applicable water quality standards.
Table 3-11 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Chronic)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Acute)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Agricultural)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Human Health)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Water Quality)
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 4.12 9.34 2.75 0.27 0.27
Cadmium 0.10 0.20 0.45 0.23 0.10
Chromium 0.92 1.33 8.33 0.83 0.83
Copper 0.96 1.39 21.41 139.18 0.96
Cyanide 0.25 1.06 - 7.25 0.25
Lead 0.10 2.50 192.17 0.58 0.10
Mercury 0.03 0.05 - 0.07 0.03
Nickel 1.34 12.15 5.17 2.58 1.34
Silver - 0.20 - - 0.20
175
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
20 Table 3-11 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Chronic)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Acute)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Agricultural)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Human Health)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Water Quality)
(lbs/day)
Zinc 8.57 8.57 142.75 - 8.57
Molybdenum - - 0.41 - 0.41
Selenium 0.15 - 0.60 1.50 0.15
Ammonia - - - 677.64 677.64
According to WDR Order No. 98-131, biosolids generated at the Industrial WWTF are to be managed on- site. Sludge that accumulates in the treatment and storage ponds is removed at the discretion of a local grower and land-applied for agricultural purposes on City-owned reclamation fields, consistent with Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations and with the Regional Water Quality Control Board approval. The City does not oversee sludge removal or application activities but conducts mid-year monitoring to assess solids accumulation levels.
At the Domestic WWTF, as specified in WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004, biosolids are managed through a mechanical dewatering process. Sludge is thickened and dewatered using a centrifuge, then further dried in 14 lined, paved drying beds equipped with underdrains. The underdrains return collected decant to the treatment process for additional treatment. Once dried, biosolids are temporarily stored in a holding bin prior to being hauled offsite for land application at a permitted facility, while screenings and grit from the headworks are transported to a local landfill. Under current operations, solids removed from the Industrial WWTF primary clarifier are conveyed to the Domestic WWTF drying beds for dewatering, while settled solids within the Industrial treatment and storage ponds are managed separately by a local growe r for land application on City-owned reclamation fields.
Federal regulations for sludge disposal (40 CFR Part 503) continue to apply, establishing limits on metals and other pollutants that may be present in biosolids due to industrial contributions. For local limits development, these regulatory thresholds are translated into AHLs for POCs using Equation 2 , which is based on Equation 5.9 from the EPA’s 2004 Local Limits Development Guidance manual. This ensures that the combined biosolids generated by both WWTFs remain suitable for land application and compliant with all applicable state and federal requirements.
Equation 2 – AHL based on Sludge Land Application and Surface Disposal:
AHL𝑆𝐿𝐷𝐺 = (0.0022)(𝐶𝐵𝑆𝑂𝐿)(𝑄𝐵𝑆𝑂𝐿)
𝑅𝑊𝑊𝑇𝑃
Where:
AHLSLDG = AHL based on sludge, lb/day
C BSOL = Biosolids limitation, mg/kg dry sludge
Q BSOL = Total sludge flow to disposal, dry metric tons per day RWWTF = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal
176
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
21 GSLDG = Specific gravity of sludge, kg/L
0.0022 = Conversion factor
For Equation 2, QBSOL represents the total sludge flow to disposal in dry metric tons per day. In this study, QBSOL is estimated from the daily BOD removed at each facility and then converted to dry metric tons per day. The formula for estimating BOD removal is based on calculating the difference between the influent and effluent organic loads entering and leaving the treatment facility. First, the influent and effluent BOD concentrations, measured in milligrams per liter, are converted to mass loadings in pounds per day using the standard conversion factor of 8.34, multiplied by the plant flow in MGD. The amount of BOD removed is then determined by subtracting the effluent load from the influent load, with the result representing the daily mass of BOD reduced through treatment. To translate this value into an estimate of sludge production, the pounds of BOD removed are converted to dry metric tons per day by dividing by 2,204.62.
Table 3-12 presents the biosolids disposal based AHLs for the Industrial WWTF.
Table 3-12 Industrial WWTF – Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs Pollutant
Sludge Flow
to Disposal
(MTD) (QBSOL)
Land Application
Standard
(mg/kg) (CBSOL)(1)
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 0.39 41 45% 0.08
Cadmium 0.39 39 67% 0.05
Chromium 0.39 - 82% -
Copper 0.39 1500 86% 1.49
Cyanide 0.39 - 69% -
Lead 0.39 300 61% 0.42
Mercury 0.39 17 60% 0.02
Nickel 0.39 420 42% 0.86
Silver 0.39 - 75% -
Zinc 0.39 - 79% -
Molybdenum 0.39 - 63% -
Selenium 0.39 100 50% 0.17
Ammonia 0.39 - 0% -
Notes:
(1)Based on Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 503 Table 3 of Section 503.13
Table 3 -13 presents the biosolids disposal –based AHLs for the Domestic WWTF. In 2024, operational issues at the facility resulted in effluent BOD values exceeding influent levels, making the data unsuitable for solids estimation. Accordingly, the calculation of QBSOL is based on 2023 influent and effluent BOD and flow data, which provided more reliable results.
177
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
22 Table 3-13 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs Pollutant
Sludge Flow
to Disposal
(MTD) (QBSOL)
Land Application
Standard
(mg/kg) (CBSOL)(1)
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 1.19 41 45% 0.24
Cadmium 1.19 39 67% 0.15
Chromium 1.19 - 82% -
Copper 1.19 1500 86% 4.58
Cyanide 1.19 - 69% -
Lead 1.19 300 61% 1.29
Mercury 1.19 17 60% 0.07
Nickel 1.19 420 42% 2.63
Silver 1.19 - 75% -
Zinc 1.19 - 79% -
Molybdenum 1.19 - 63% -
Selenium 1.19 100 50% 0.53
Ammonia 1.19 - 34% -
Notes:
(1)Based on Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 503 Table 3 of Section 503.13
3.2.2.2. Inhibition Based AHLs
Elevated concentrations of specific pollutants in wastewater or sludge can adversely impact the performance of biological treatment processes typically employed at wastewater treatment facilities.
Both the Industrial and Domestic WWTFs rely on activated sl udge systems that are particularly sensitive to inhibitory substances. Although there have been no documented operational upsets at either facility attributed to inhibitory pollutants, the potential for such impacts warrants a conservative approach.
Therefore, inhibition -based AHLs are calculated as a preventive measure to safeguard treatment performance.
In accordance with the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance, inhibition threshold values are used in estimating AHLs for pollutants of concern. These values are derived from literature -based inhibition concentrations and are applied using Equation 3 from the EPA guidance. The calculations incorporate relevant removal efficiencies and site -specific influent data. The corresponding threshold values are included in Appendix G of the EPA guidance. By incorporating inhibition-based AHLs, the City ensures that local limits remain technically defensible and protective of both facilities’ biological treatment systems.
Equation 3 – AHL based on Activated Sludge Inhibition Values:
AHL𝐴𝐶𝑇 = (8.34)(𝐶𝐴𝐶𝑇)(𝑄𝑊𝑊𝑇𝐹)
1 − 𝑅𝑊𝑊𝑇𝑃
Where:
178
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
23 AHLACT = AHL based on activated sludge inhibition, lb/day CACT = Inhibition or nitrification criterion for activated sludge, mg/L (EPA Local Limits Development Guidance, Appendix G)
QWWTF = WWTF average flow rate, MGD
RWWTF = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal
8.34 = Conversion factor
Table 3 -14 presents the calculated AHLs for the Industrial WWTF, based on inhibition thresholds for activated sludge and nitrification processes.
Table 3-14 Industrial WWTF – Activated Sludge and Nitrification Inhibition Based AHLs Pollutant
WWTF
Flow
(MGD)
(QWWTF)
Inhibition Level
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable Headworks
Activated
Sludge
(mg/L)
(CACT)(1)
Nitrification
(mg/L) (CCRIT)(2)
Activated
Sludge
(lbs/day)
Nitrification
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 0.710 0.1 1.5 45% 1.09 16.28
Cadmium 0.710 1 5.2 67% 17.94 93.31
Chromium 0.710 1 0.25 82% 32.90 8.22
Copper 0.710 1 0.05 86% 42.30 2.11
Cyanide 0.710 0.1 0.34 69% 1.91 6.49
Lead 0.710 1 0.5 61% 15.18 7.59
Mercury 0.710 0.1 - 60% 1.48 -
Nickel 0.710 - 0.25 42% - 2.55
Silver 0.710 - - 75% - -
Zinc 0.710 0.3 0.08 79% 8.46 2.26
Molybdenum 0.710 - - 63% - -
Selenium 0.710 - - 50% - -
Ammonia 0.710 480 - 0% 2,842.39 -
Notes:
(1)Based on the reported range of Activated Sludge Inhibition Threshold Levels as reported in Appendix G of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance.
(2)Based on the reported range of Nitrification Inhibition Threshold Levels as reported in Appendix G of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance.
Table 3-15 presents the calculated AHLs for the Domestic WWTF, derived using inhibition thresholds for activated sludge and nitrification processes, consistent with the methodology applied for the Industrial WWTF in Table 3-14.
179
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
24 Table 3-15 Domestic WWTF – Activated Sludge and Nitrification Inhibition Based AHLs Pollutant
WWTF
Flow
(MGD)
(QWWTF)
Inhibition Level
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable Headworks
Activated
Sludge
(mg/L)
(CACT)(1)
Nitrification
(mg/L)
(CCRIT)(2)
Activated
Sludge
(lbs/day)
Nitrification
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 1.80 0.1 1.5 45% 2.75 41.22
Cadmium 1.80 1 5.2 67% 45.42 236.19
Chromium 1.80 1 0.25 82% 83.27 20.82
Copper 1.80 1 0.05 86% 107.06 5.35
Cyanide 1.80 0.1 0.34 69% 4.84 16.44
Lead 1.80 1 0.5 61% 38.43 19.22
Mercury 1.80 0.1 - 60% 3.75 -
Nickel 1.80 - 0.25 42% - 6.46
Silver 1.80 - - 75% - -
Zinc 1.80 0.3 0.08 79% 21.41 5.71
Molybdenum 1.80 - - 63% - -
Selenium 1.80 - - 50% - -
Ammonia 1.80 480 - 34% 10,842.28 -
Notes:
(1)Based on the reported range of Activated Sludge Inhibition Threshold Levels as reported in Appendix G of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance.
(2)Based on the reported range of Nitrification Inhibition Threshold Levels as reported in Appendix G of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance.
Table 3 -16 summarizes the inhibition -based AHLs calculated for the Industrial WWTF, with the most restrictive (i.e., lowest) loading identified for each POC.
Table 3-16 Industrial WWTF – Summary Inhibition Based AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Activated Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable Headworks
(Nitrification) (lbs/day)
Most Stringent
Inhibition/AHL
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 1.09 16.28 1.09
Cadmium 17.94 93.31 17.94
Chromium 32.90 8.22 8.22
Copper 42.30 2.11 2.11
Cyanide 1.91 6.49 1.91
Lead 15.18 7.59 7.59
Mercury 1.48 - 1.48
Nickel - 2.55 2.55
180
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
25 Silver - - 0.00
Zinc 8.46 2.26 2.26
Molybdenum - - -
Selenium - - -
Ammonia 2,842.39 - 2,842.39
Table 3-17 presents a summary of the inhibition -based AHLs for the Domestic WWTF, highlighting the lowest allowable loading selected for each POC.
Table 3-17 Domestic WWTF – Summary Inhibition Based AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Activated Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable Headworks
(Nitrification) (lbs/day)
Most Stringent
Inhibition/AHL
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 2.75 41.22 2.75
Cadmium 45.42 236.19 45.42
Chromium 83.27 20.82 20.82
Copper 107.06 5.35 5.35
Cyanide 4.84 16.44 4.84
Lead 38.43 19.22 19.22
Mercury 3.75 - 3.75
Nickel - 6.46 6.46
Silver - - 0.00
Zinc 21.41 5.71 5.71
Molybdenum - - -
Selenium - - -
Ammonia 10,842.28 - 10,842.28
3.2.3. Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings
The MAHL for each POC is defined as the most conservative, or lowest, value among the calculated AHLs derived from applicable environmental and treatment-based criteria. These criteria include water quality standards, sludge disposal regulations, and process inhibition thresholds. By maintaining influent loadings below the MAHL, the treatment facilities can ensure compliance with all relevant regulatory and operational requirements. Table 3 -18 summarizes the AHLs evaluated for each POC and identifies the corresponding MAHL selected for the Industrial WWTF.
Table 3-18 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks (Water
Quality) (lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks (Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Inhibition)
(lbs/day)
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 0.11 0.08 1.09 0.08
181
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
26 Table 3-18 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks (Water
Quality) (lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks (Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Inhibition)
(lbs/day)
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Cadmium 0.04 0.05 17.94 0.04
Chromium 0.33 - 8.22 0.33
Copper 0.38 1.49 2.11 0.38
Cyanide 0.10 - 1.91 0.10
Lead 0.04 0.42 7.59 0.04
Mercury 0.01 0.02 1.48 0.01
Nickel 0.53 0.86 2.55 0.53
Silver 0.08 - 0.00 0.00
Zinc 3.38 - 2.26 2.26
Molybdenum 0.16 - - 0.16
Selenium 0.06 0.17 - 0.06
Ammonia 177.65 - 2842.39 177.65
Table 3 -19 summarizes the calculated AHLs for each POC at the Domestic WWTF and identifies the corresponding MAHL based on the most conservative applicable criteria.
Table 3-19 Domestic WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks (Water
Quality) (lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks (Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Inhibition)
(lbs/day)
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Arsenic 0.27 0.24 2.75 0.24
Cadmium 0.10 0.15 45.42 0.10
Chromium 0.83 - 20.82 0.83
Copper 0.96 4.58 5.35 0.96
Cyanide 0.25 - 4.84 0.25
Lead 0.10 1.29 19.22 0.10
Mercury 0.03 0.07 3.75 0.03
Nickel 1.34 2.63 6.46 1.34
Silver 0.20 - 0.00 0.00
Zinc 8.57 - 5.71 5.71
Molybdenum 0.41 - - 0.41
Selenium 0.15 0.53 - 0.15
Ammonia 677.64 - 10,842.28 677.64
182
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
27 3.2.4. Designating Local Limits
Following the calculation of the MAHLs for each POC, the next step is to identify which POCs require the development of local limits. In accordance with the EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance, local limits should be established for any POC where the average influent loading exceeds 60% of its respective MAHL.
Tables 3-20 and 3-21 present comparisons of the calculated MAHLs and the average influent loadings for each POC at the Industrial and Domestic WWTFs, respectively. Pollutants exceeding the 60% thr eshold are flagged for further evaluation and the development of site -specific local limits to ensure compliance and protect treatment processes.
Table 3-20 Industrial WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Average Influent
Loading (lbs/day)
Average Percent
Loaded
New Local Limit
Required?
Arsenic 0.08 0.03 38% No
Cadmium 0.04 0.00 8% No
Chromium 0.33 0.02 6% No
Copper 0.38 1.38 363% Yes
Cyanide 0.10 0.02 24% Yes
Lead 0.04 0.20 515% Yes
Mercury 0.01 0.001 10% No
Nickel 0.53 0.03 6% No
Silver 0.00 0.02 0% No
Zinc 2.26 1.43 63% Yes
Molybdenum 0.16 0.01 9% No
Selenium 0.06 0.06 100% Yes
Ammonia 177.65 33.75 19% No
Table 3-21 presents a comparison of the calculated MAHLs and average influent loadings for each POC at the Domestic WWTF, identifying those that exceed 60% of the MAHL and require the development of local limits.
Table 3-21 Domestic WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Average Influent
Loading (lbs/day)
Average Percent
Loaded
New Local Limit
Required?
Arsenic 0.24 0.05 21% No
Cadmium 0.10 0.01 7% No
Chromium 0.83 0.08 9% No
Copper 0.96 0.89 92% Yes
183
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
28 Table 3-21 Domestic WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Average Influent
Loading (lbs/day)
Average Percent
Loaded
New Local Limit
Required?
Cyanide 0.25 0.04 18% No
Lead 0.10 0.03 35% No
Mercury 0.03 0.002 8% No
Nickel 1.34 0.08 6% No
Silver 0.00 0.04 0% No
Zinc 5.71 3.43 60% Yes
Molybdenum 0.41 0.04 10% No
Selenium 0.15 0.10 69% Yes
Ammonia 677.64 415.62 61% Yes
3.2.5. Background Loadings for Non-Industrial Sources
An essential component of the local limits development process is the quantification of background pollutant loadings from non -industrial sources. In accordance with the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance, these background contributions , typically originating from residential, commercial, and other uncontrolled sources , must be accurately characterized and deducted from the treatment facility’s capacity to ensure that allowable loadings allocated to industrial users do not cause pass-through, interference, or violations of applicable discharge requirements.
At the City of Sanger, Domestic WWTF receives influent wastewater from a combination of residential, commercial, and four permitted industrial users: Initiative Foods, International Paper, and Pitman Family Hatchery, and GBI USA Co. In contrast, the Industrial WWTF exclusively receives flow from two SIU s and does not accept contributions from residential or commercial users. The Industrial WWTF does not receive hauled waste, and due to the facility’s separately design, the potential for inflow and infiltrat ion is minimal. As a result, there are no uncontrolled sources contributing to the Industrial WWTF, and the full MAHL for each pollutant is available for allocation to the permitted industrial users, subject to applicable safety factors and growth allowances as specified in EPA guidance. Uncontrolled background loadings are only applicable to the Domestic WWTF.
To estimate non-industrial contributions, the City conducted sampling at seven lift stations that primarily collect flow from residential and commercial areas. While GBI USA Co. discharges to the City’s Academy/Commerce lift station the other industrial users connect directly to the sewer lines feeding the Domestic WWTF, minimizing overlap. Sampling data from the five lift stations that do not receive any industrial discharges, provided in Appendix A, were used to characterize pollutant concentrations from non-industrial sources. The mass loadings from these sources were calculated using Equation 4 from EPA guidance.
Equation 4 – Residential and Background Loading Calculation 𝐿𝑈𝑁𝐶 = (𝐶𝑈𝑁𝐶) (𝑄𝑈𝑁𝐶)(8.34)
184
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
29 Where:
LUNC = Uncontrolled loading, lb/day
CUNC = Uncontrolled pollutant concentration, mg/L
QUNC = Uncontrolled flow rate, MGD
8.34 = Conversion factor
The uncontrolled flow rate (Q UNC) was determined by subtracting the total industrial flow (0.089 MGD) from the average daily influent flow to the Domestic WWTF (1. 80 MGD) for 2024 , resulting in a background flow of 1.71 MGD. Pollutant concentrations (CUNC) were derived from the lift station sampling data, and the calculated loadings (L UNC) are summarized in Table 3-22. This background loading analysis ensures that local limits developed for the Domestic WWTF accurately reflect the capacity available for industrial discharges, consistent with EPA methodology and the City’s treatment system design.
Table 3-22 Estimated Background Loadings from Non-Industrial Sources Pollutant
Uncontrolled
Flow
(MGD)(QUNC)
Uncontrolled
Pollutant
Concentration
(mg/L) (CUNC)
Nonindustrial
Loading (lbs/day)
(LUNC)
Arsenic 1.71 0.003 0.048
Cadmium 1.71 0.000 0.006
Chromium 1.71 0.004 0.061
Copper 1.71 0.059 0.844
Cyanide 1.71 0.003 0.041
Lead 1.71 0.002 0.034
Mercury 1.71 0.000 0.003
Nickel 1.71 0.005 0.077
Silver 1.71 0.003 0.036
Zinc 1.71 0.220 3.135
Molybdenum 1.71 0.002 0.035
Selenium 1.71 0.007 0.104
Ammonia 1.71 25.820 368
3.2.6. Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings
The Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL) represents the portion of a pollutant’s headworks loading capacity that may be allocated to industrial sources without exceeding the treatment facility’s operational or regulatory thresholds. For both the Dom estic and Industrial WWTFs, MAIL values are derived by subtracting background loadings from non -industrial sources and applying a safety factor to account for variability and uncertainty. MAIL values are calculated using Equation 5 from the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance.
Equation 5 – MAIL Calculation
185
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
30 𝑀𝐴𝐼𝐿 = 𝑀𝐴𝐻𝐿(1 − 𝑆𝐹) − (𝐿𝑈𝑁𝐶 + 𝐻𝑊 + 𝐺𝐴)
Where:
MAIL = Maximum allowable industrial loading, lb/day
MAHL = Maximum allowable headworks loading, lb/day
SF = Safety factor, decimal
LUNC = Loadings from uncontrolled sources, lb/day
HW = Loadings from hauled waste, if not regulated through the local limits, lb/day GA = Growth allowance, lb/day
3.2.6.1. Safety Factor and Growth Allowances
To account for variability and uncertainty in the data used to develop MAHLs, a safety factor is applied when calculating the MAILs. In accordance with EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance, a minimum 10 percent safety factor has been applied uniformly across all pollutants of concern. This conservative approach helps protect each facility from fluctuations in industrial discharge characteristics and ensures continued compliance with effluent and sludge quality objectives.
A growth allowance is an optional portion of the MAHL that may be reserved to accommodate future increases in pollutant loadings resulting from industrial expansion. However, the City of Sanger is not currently aware of any major industrial growth or expansion that would affect the Industrial or Domestic WWTF’s influent characteristics. As such, no growth allowance has been included in this evaluation.
3.2.6.2. Industrial WWTF MAIL Evaluation
The Industrial WWTF currently only receives wastewater from two SIUs: Pitman Farms and Gibson Winery.
Because the facility does not receive residential, commercial, or hauled waste contributions, background loading is considered negligible (LUNC = 0). Therefore, the full MAHL, adjusted for the 10% safety factor, is available for allocation to the permitted SIUs, as shown in Table 3-23 below.
Table 3-23 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
Loading
(lbs/day)
(MAHL)
Safety
Factor
(SF)
Nonindustrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
(LUNC)
Hauled
Waste
Loading
(lbs/day)
(HW)
Growth
Allowance
(%)
(GA)
Maximum
Allowable
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
(MAIL)
Arsenic 0.08 10% 0 0 0 0.07
Cadmium 0.04 10% 0 0 0 0.04
Chromium 0.33 10% 0 0 0 0.30
Copper 0.38 10% 0 0 0 0.34
Cyanide 0.10 10% 0 0 0 0.09
Lead 0.04 10% 0 0 0 0.03
Mercury 0.01 10% 0 0 0 0.01
186
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
31 Table 3-23 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
Loading
(lbs/day)
(MAHL)
Safety
Factor
(SF)
Nonindustrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
(LUNC)
Hauled
Waste
Loading
(lbs/day)
(HW)
Growth
Allowance
(%)
(GA)
Maximum
Allowable
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
(MAIL)
Nickel 0.53 10% 0 0 0 0.48
Silver 0.00 10% 0 0 0 0.00
Zinc 2.26 10% 0 0 0 2.03
Molybdenum 0.16 10% 0 0 0 0.14
Selenium 0.06 10% 0 0 0 0.05
Ammonia 177.65 10% 0 0 0 159.88
3.2.6.3. Domestic WWTF MAIL Evaluation
At the Domestic WWTF, influent flows are derived from a mix of residential, commercial, and small-scale industrial sources. As a result, background loadings from uncontrolled (non-industrial) contributors (LUNC) must be deducted from the facility’s overall loading capacity before determining the allowable loadings for the industrial users. Applying the same assumptions used for the Industrial WWTF, a 10 percent safety factor and zero growth allowance, the MAILs for the Domestic WWTF were calculated using Equation 6.
These values reflect the portion of the capacity available for industrial dischargers after accounting for non-industrial contributions. Table 3-24 presents the resulting MAILs for each pollutant of concern.
Table 3-24 Domestic WWTF – Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
Loading
(lbs/day)
(MAHL)
Safety
Factor
(SF)
Nonindustrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
(LUNC)
Hauled
Waste
Loading
(lbs/day)
(HW)
Growth
Allowance
(%)
(GA)
Maximum
Allowable
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
(MAIL)
Arsenic 0.24 10% 0.051 0 0 0.16
Cadmium 0.10 10% 0.006 0 0 0.08
Chromium 0.83 10% 0.069 0 0 0.68
Copper 0.96 10% 0.789 0 0 0.08
Cyanide 0.25 10% 0.043 0 0 0.18
Lead 0.10 10% 0.034 0 0 0.05
Mercury 0.03 10% 0.002 0 0 0.02
Nickel 1.34 10% 0.078 0 0 1.13
Silver 0.00 10% 0.036 0 0 0.00
Zinc 5.71 10% 3.337 0 0 1.80
Molybdenum 0.41 10% 0.038 0 0 0.33
Selenium 0.15 10% 0.111 0 0 0.02
187
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
32 Table 3-24 Domestic WWTF – Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
Loading
(lbs/day)
(MAHL)
Safety
Factor
(SF)
Nonindustrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
(LUNC)
Hauled
Waste
Loading
(lbs/day)
(HW)
Growth
Allowance
(%)
(GA)
Maximum
Allowable
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
(MAIL)
Ammonia 677.64 10% 392.084 0 0 217.79
3.2.7. Local Limits Allocation
After calculating the MAIL for each POC, the next step in the local limits development process is to allocate these loadings among permitted industrial dischargers. The allocation approach must ensure equitable distribution of pollutant loadings while maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements and protecting the integrity of the wastewater treatment systems. Two primary methods are recognized by the EPA for allocating MAILs:
1. Uniform Allocation Method – Assigns a single, concentration -based local limit to all permitted SIUs, regardless of their individual flow or pollutant contribution.
2. Industrial User-Specific Allocation Method – Distributes the MAILs proportionally based on each SIU’s flow volume or pollutant load contribution.
The selection of the allocation method depends on the number and characteristics of industrial users, variability of discharges, administrative feasibility, and system configuration.
3.2.8. Industrial WWTF – Evaluation of Local Limits
The two SIUs that discharge wastewater to the City’s Industrial WWTF exhibit similar influent characteristics and pollutant profiles. Given this limited and uniform user base, the Uniform Allocation Method is appropriate and consistent with U.S. EPA guidance.
The Uniform Allocation Method assigns a single concentration-based local limit to all permitted industrial users. This approach is consistent with U.S. EPA guidance and is appropriate when users have similar pollutant profiles. Under the uniform method, the MAIL for each pollutant is converted into a single concentration-based local limit applicable to all SIUs. This limit is calculated using Equation 6.
Equation 6 – Uniform Allocation Calculation
𝐶𝐿𝐼𝑀 = 𝑀𝐴𝐼𝐿
(𝑄𝑆𝐼𝑈 × 8.34)
Where:
CLIM = Uniform concentration limit, mg/L
MAIL = Maximum allowable industrial loading, lb/day
MAHL = Maximum allowable headworks loading, lb/day
QSIU = Total flow rate from SIUs, MGD
8.34 = Conversion factor
188
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
33 This method ensures equitable application of local limits across both SIUs and simplifies permit administration, monitoring, and compliance tracking. Table 3-25 provides the proposed local limits based on the uniform allocation method.
Table 3-25 Industrial WWTF – Uniform Allocation of Local Limits Pollutant
MAIL
(lbs/day)
(MAIL)
Total Industrial
Flow (MGD)
(QSIU)
Proposed
Local Limit
(mg/L)
(CLIM)
Arsenic 0.07 0.71 0.012
Cadmium 0.04 0.71 0.006
Chromium 0.30 0.71 0.050
Copper 0.34 0.71 0.058
Cyanide 0.09 0.71 0.015
Lead 0.03 0.71 0.006
Mercury 0.01 0.71 0.002
Nickel 0.48 0.71 0.081
Silver 0.00 0.71 0.000
Zinc 2.03 0.71 0.343
Molybdenum 0.14 0.71 0.024
Selenium 0.05 0.71 0.009
Ammonia 159.88 0.71 27.00
3.2.9. Domestic WWTF – Evaluation of Local Limits
For the Domestic WWTF, the uniform allocation method described in Equation 6 was used to derive pollutant-specific local limits presented in Table 3 -26. This approach distributes the MAIL evenly across the industrial flow to Domestic WWTF, which is approximately 0.089 MGD. The resulting concentration - based limits (CLIM) represent the maximum allowable discharge strength for each pollutant of concern to ensure compliance with the applicable MAHLs and continued protection of treatment performance and disposal operations.
Table 3-26 Domestic WWTF – Uniform Allocation of Local Limits Pollutant
MAIL
(lbs/day)
(MAIL)
Total Industrial
Flow (MGD)
(QSIU)
Proposed
Local Limit
(mg/L)
(CLIM)
Arsenic 0.16 0.089 0.22
Cadmium 0.08 0.089 0.11
189
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
34 Table 3-26 Domestic WWTF – Uniform Allocation of Local Limits Pollutant
MAIL
(lbs/day)
(MAIL)
Total Industrial
Flow (MGD)
(QSIU)
Proposed
Local Limit
(mg/L)
(CLIM)
Chromium 0.68 0.089 0.92
Copper 0.08 0.089 0.11
Cyanide 0.18 0.089 0.25
Lead 0.05 0.089 0.07
Mercury 0.02 0.089 0.03
Nickel 1.13 0.089 1.53
Silver 0.00 0.089 0.00
Zinc 1.80 0.089 2.44
Molybdenum 0.33 0.089 0.44
Selenium 0.02 0.089 0.03
Ammonia 217.79 0.089 294.35
190
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 4 – Proposed Local Limits
35 SECTION 4 - PROPOSED LOCAL LIMITS
After evaluating pollutant loadings at both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs using facility design criteria, applicable WDRs, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Local Limits Development Guidance, this section consolidates those findings into a set of proposed local discharge limits for the City of Sanger. The proposed limits intend to protect facility performance, ensure regulatory compliance, and provide an equitable allocation of capacity between residential and industrial users. Through the implementation of these limits, the City will maintain discharges within each facility’s treatment capabilities, safeguard effluent and biosolids quality, and preserve sufficient capacity to accommodate future growth. The following subsections present a comparison of existing and proposed limits and outline the recommended actions for implementation.
4.1. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Limits
Table 4-1 presents a comparison of the City’s existing and proposed local limits for both the Industrial and Domestic WWTFs. It identifies the POCs that warrant enforceable limits and specifies how those limits must be adjusted to ensure continued regulatory compliance and protection of treatment processes.
In addition to the local limits evaluated in Section 3, the City should establish local limits for both pH and Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) to ensure continued protection of the treatment facilities and collection system. A pH range of 6.0 to 9.0 standard units is recommended for both facilities to ensure optimal biological treatment performance and prevent structural deterioration. In no case shall wastewater with a pH lower than 5.0 be accepted, as such wastes are corrosive and can cause severe damage to concrete, metal, and mechanical components throughout both treatment facilities. Establishing this range will provide adequate protection against both corrosion and chemical scaling, ensuring long -term structural and operational reliability.
Similarly, a local limit for FOG is recommended to minimize the potential for blockages, pond surface scum accumulation, and operational interference within the aerated and storage ponds. Excessive FOG can reduce oxygen transfer efficiency and contribute to premature solids buildup. Based on EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance and standard industry practices for lagoon -based treatment systems, a concentration-based limit of 100 mg/L is recommended. This value is consistent with 40 CFR 403.5(b)(3), which prohibits discharges capable of causing obstruction to flow in the POTW, and provides a technically defensible threshold for maintaining reliable treatment performance and infrastructure protection.
Table 4-1 Comparison of Existing and Proposed Local Limits Pollutant Existing Local
Limit(1)
Industrial WWTF Domestic WWTF
Proposed
Local Limit
Required
Local Limit
Proposed
Local Limit
Required
Local Limit
Arsenic 1.0 mg/L 0.012 mg/L No 0.22 mg/L No
Cadmium 0.7 mg/L 0.006 mg/L No 0.11 mg/L No
Chromium 1.0 mg/L 0.05 mg/L No 0.93 mg/L No
Copper 1.0 mg/L 0.058 mg/L Yes 0.03 mg/L Yes
Cyanide 1.0 mg/L 0.015 mg/L Yes 0.25 mg/L No
191
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 4 – Proposed Local Limits
36 Table 4-1 Comparison of Existing and Proposed Local Limits Pollutant Existing Local
Limit(1)
Industrial WWTF Domestic WWTF
Proposed
Local Limit
Required
Local Limit
Proposed
Local Limit
Required
Local Limit
Lead 0.4 mg/L 0.006 mg/L Yes 0.07 mg/L No
Mercury 0.01 mg/L 0.002 mg/L No 0.03 mg/L No
Nickel 1.0 mg/L 0.081 mg/L No 1.53 mg/L No
Silver 0.7 mg/L 0.00 mg/L No 0.00 mg/L No
Zinc 1.0 mg/L 0.343 mg/L Yes 2.71 mg/L Yes
Molybdenum None 0.024 mg/L No 0.45 mg/L No
Selenium 2.0 mg/L 0.009 mg/L Yes 0.04 mg/L Yes
BOD5 300 mg/L 1,000 mg/L Yes 500 mg/L Yes
Total Suspended Solids 300 mg/L 600mg/L Yes 500 mg/L Yes Ammonia 0.32 mg/L 27 mg/L No 327 mg/L Yes
EC 700 µmhos/cm 700 µmhos/cm Yes 1,000 µmhos/cm Yes
pH 6.5 – 8.5 6.0 – 9.0 Yes 6.0 – 9.0 Yes
FOG 100 mg/L 100 mg/L Yes 100 mg/L Yes
Note:
(1)Existing Local Limit are detailed in Section 82-175 of the City of Sanger's Municipal Code and pertain to both the Industrial and Domestic WWTFs.
4.2. Recommended Action and Conclusion
Based on the evaluation of pollutant loadings at both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs, the proposed local limits summarized in this Study represent the most appropriate limits for implementation by the City of Sanger. Adoption of these limits will ensure that discharges from industrial users do not interfere with treatment processes, compromise effluent or biosolids quality, exceed design capacity, or cause violations of the City’s WDRs. The recommended limits also provide a fair and equitable allocation of treatment capacity between residential and industrial users, while preserving sufficient capacity to accommodate reasonable future growth.
It is recommended that the City proceed with the adoption and implementation of the proposed required local limits presented in Table 4-1 for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs and incorporate them into the City’s Industrial Pretreatment Program and Municipal Code. These enforceable limits will provide the regulatory basis for managing industrial discharges, issuing permits, and taking corrective actions where necessary to protect the City’s treatment infrastructure and water resources. Implementation of these local limits will enable the City of Sanger to maintain compliance with federal and state pretreatment regulations, uphold water quality protections, and continue providing reliable wastewater treatment service to the community.
192
DRAFT
City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Appendix A - Residential Background Sampling
37 APPENDIX A
RESIDENTIAL BACKGROUND SAMPLING
193
DRAFT
Day 1 Result Day 2 Result Day 1 Result Day 2 Result Day 1 Result Day 2 Result Day 1 Result Day 2 Result Day 1 Result Day 2 Result Day 1 Result Day 2 Result Arsenic mg/L 0.01 EPA 200.7 0.0039 0.005 0.0037 0.0036 0.0064 0.0026 0.0011 0.0019 0.0037 0.0038 0.0037 0.0032 0.004 Cadmium mg/L 0.001 EPA 200.7 0.0005 0.00023 0.0005 0.00059 0.00048 0.0005(1) 0.0005 0.00025 0.0005 0.0005 0.00033 0.0005 0.000 Chromium mg/L 0.005 EPA 200.7 0.0036 0.007 0.0036 0.0035 0.012 0.0029 0.0034 0.0064 0.0055 0.0028 0.0047 0.0026 0.005 Copper mg/L 0.005 EPA 200.7 0.029 0.039 0.027 0.044 0.064 0.0081 0.27 0.1 0.024 0.023 0.026 0.01 0.055 Cyanide mg/L 0.005 SM 4500-CN E 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0066 0.0025 0.003 Lead mg/L 0.005 EPA 200.7 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.002 0.0025 0.0024 0.0015 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.002 Mercury mg/L 0.0002 EPA 245.1 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.00086 0.0001 0.000 Nickel mg/L 0.005 EPA 200.7 0.0033 0.0085 0.0027 0.0077 0.0084 0.0033 0.0059 0.0072 0.0025 0.0013 0.013 0.0018 0.005 Silver mg/L 0.005 EPA 200.7 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.003 Zinc mg/L 0.005 EPA 200.7 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.51 0.49 0.12 0.099 0.33 0.095 0.046 0.61 0.11 0.234 Molybdenum mg/L 0.005 EPA 200.7 0.0021 0.0026 0.0025 0.0022 0.0054 0.0022 0.0013 0.0022 0.0025 0.0024 0.0034 0.0035 0.003 Selenium mg/L 0.020 EPA 200.7 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0012 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.001 0.008 BOD5 mg/L 100 SM 5210 B 350 700 190 290 740 400 250 320 230 210 410 270 363 Total Suspended Solids mg/L 20 SM 2540 D 120 190 310 210 490 40 130 76 99 83 330 88 181 Ammonia mg/L 5.0 EPA 350.1 26 6.3 63 8.8 59 13 73 14 18 6.1 29 14 28 EC µs/cm 1 SM 2510 B 120 190 870 720 900 880 1200 1400 510 690 820 860 763 North & Greenwood Muscat & Commerce 5th & Reagen 8th & Tucker Average Concentration
Appendix A
Residential Background Sampling
Pollutant Units Reporting Limit Analytical
Method
Church & J Newmark & Annadale
Notes:
(1)For reporting purposes, concentrations listed as "Not Detected" are interpreted as one-half of the laboratory detection limit. 194
Prepared by: Joshua Goggins Approved by:
01484.0005 2077401.1
REVIEW: City Manager: Finance: City Attorney:
TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION Consent
Informational Item
X Action Item
Department Report
X Public Hearing
Matter Initiated by a Council Member
Other:
Continued to:
For the Meeting of: January 15, 2026
Agenda Item No.: I-1
CITY OF SANGER
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Joshua Goggins, Community Development Director
Subject: Tract 6531 – Serenade II Subdivision
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), General Plan Amendment No. 2025 -01 (GPA 2025 -01), Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02 (ZOA 2025-02)
Attachments:
1. City Council Resolution No. 2026-03 Approving Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Plan and Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for Tract 6531, and General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01.
2. City Council Ordinance No. 2026-01 approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 202 5-02 (Rezone).
3. Tentative Map for Tract 6531.
4. Agency Comments.
5. Tentative Map Conditions of Approval.
6. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
None known.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Recommends that City Council:
a. Waive the full reading and introduce, by title only, Ordinance No. 2026-01 an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Sanger adopting Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02 (ZOA 2025-02) rezoning the Project area from R-1-6 (Single Family Residential) to the R-1-7.5 (Single Family Residential) zone district
195
01484.0005 2077401.1
b. Approve General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01 (GPA 2025-01) changing the General Plan Land Use Designation of approximately 10 acres within the Project area from Medium Density Residential to Medium Low Density Residential
c. Adopt Resolution 2026-03, Approving the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Plan and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMRP) prepared for Tract 6531, General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Tract 6531 proposes a 48- unit single family residential subdivision located generally bounded by North Avenue to the north, Bethel Avenue to the west, and Greenwood Avenue to the east. The project is proposed on one parcel, APNs 332 -090-03, consisting of approximately 10 -acres. The Project requires a number of different entitlements to be approved at the discretion of the City Council.
The proposed General Plan Amendment reduces the planned residential density on the project site; however, this amendment does not adversely affect the City’s ability to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) obligations or maintain compliance with the City’s adopted Housing Element. The City’s Housing Element demonstrates adequate residential capacity across multiple sites and land use designations. The proposed amendment represents a limited, site-specific adjustment that does not result in a citywide shortfall of housing capacity.
PROJECT BACKGROUND:
General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01:
The existing General Plan Land Use designates approximately the entirety of the site as Medium Density Residential. GPA 2025-01 proposes to amend the Land Use Designation within the Project area, changing 10 acres of Medium Density Residential to Medium Low Density Residential.
Although the amendment results in a reduction in planned residential density, the amendment remains consistent with the overall goals of the 2035 General Plan. The 2035 General Plan envisions a multitudinous range of residential densities to accommodate diverse housing types while ensuring orderly growth, neighborhood compatibility, and efficient provision of public services. The proposed R-1- 7.5 (Single Family Residential) designation remains within the spectrum of residential land uses contemplated by the 2035 General Plan and is compatible with the surrounding residential development.
The Planning Commission’s recommendation that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01 will be made by adopting Resolution 2026-03.
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02:
The Project is currently located inside City Limits. The existing zone district is City R -1-6 Single Family Residential Zone District. The Project proposes to change to the City R-1-7.5 Single Family Residential Zone District.
The Proposed General Plan Land Use of Residential – Medium Low Density has multiple zone districts that are consistent with the use. As proposed, the R -1-7.5, Single Family Residential district is the most appropriate consistent district for areas within the Project to be developed with single family units. The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02, , which may be made by adopting Ordinance No. 2026-01. 196
01484.0005 2077401.1
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The City, as the Lead Agency, has prepared an initial study and is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted for the Project. The Project is not located on a site which is included on any of the lists enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Governme nt Code including, but not limited to, lists of hazardous waste facilities, land designated as hazardous waste property, hazardous waste disposal sites and others, and the information in the Hazardous Waste and Substance Statement required under subdivision (f) of that Section. Additionally, the proposed Project will not result in any adverse effects which fall within the “Mandatory Findings of Significance” contained in Section 15065 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Finally, with the mitigation imposed, there is no substantial evidence in the record that this Project may have any direct, indirect or cumulative effects on the environment that are significant.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Adopting Cit y Council Resolution No. 2026-03 and Ordinance No. 202 6-01 allows General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01 (GPA 2025-01), Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 202 5-02 (ZOA 2025-02) to facilitate the development of 48-single family homes.
The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the 2035 General Plan and the City’s Housing Element. Although the amendment reduces planned residential density on the project site, the City maintains sufficient residential capacity to meet its RHNA obligations.
Compact residential development is achieved through efficient site design, in frastructure utilization, and neighborhood connectivity, rather than density alone. The amendment represents a reasonable, site-specific refinement of the City’s land use framework and does not undermine the 2035 General Plan’s overall housing or growth objectives.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council may choose not to adopt City Council Resolution No. 2026-03 which would preclude introduction of Ordinance No. 2026-01. If so, staff requests direction from the City Council regarding next steps.
ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:
The General Plan Land Use Map will be revised to reflect City Council Resolution No. 2026- 03. If introduced, Ordinance No. 2026-01 will be placed on the next regular meeting’s agenda for adoption.
197
01484.0005 2077401.1
ATTACHMENT 1
198
01484.0005 2077415.1
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER
APPROVING INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (MMRP) PREPARED FOR TRACT 6531, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2025- 01, FOR A 48 UNIT SUBDIVISION (TRACT 6531) GENERALLY BOUNDED BY NORTH AVENUE
TO THE NORTH, BETHEL AVENUE TO THE WEST, AND GREENWOOD
AVENUE TO THE EAST (ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 332-090-03)
WHEREAS, DR Horton on behalf of property owner James F. Cook and Stacey M. Cook, Co- Trustees of their Successors in Trust of the James F. and Stacey M. Cook Revocable Living Trust of 2016, dated June 23, 2016 (“Applicant”), submitted applications to the City for a general plan amendment (General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01( GPA 2025-01)), re-zone (Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02 (ZOA 2025-02)) conditional use permit for a planned unit development (Conditional Use Permit No. 2025-02 (CUP 2025-02)), and a tentative tract map (Tentative Tract Map No. 2025-01 for Tract 6531 (TTM 2025-01)), cumulatively referred to as the “Project”, to subdivide approximately 10 (9.97) acres generally bounded by North Avenue to the north, Bethel Avenue to the west, and Greenwood Avenue to the east, APN 332-090-03; and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes a 48-unit, single family development on 9.97 acres in the City of Sanger; and
WHEREAS, application GPA 2025-01 is proposed to redesignate the General Plan Land Use of
9.97 acres currently designated as Residential - Medium Density Land Use to the Residential – Medium Low Density Land Use; and
WHEREAS, application ZOA 2025-02 is proposed to rezone the Project area from the existing R- 1-6 (Single Family Residential) to the City of Sanger R -1-7.5 (Single Family Residential) for the Project area, consistent with the Land Use Designation as modified by GPA 2025-01; and
WHEREAS, applications TTM 2025-01 and CUP 2025-02, were proposed to subdivide the Project area into 48 single family residential units with a planned unit development ( PUD) to deviate from development standards of the R-1-7.5 zone district; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (“CEQA”), the City, as the Lead Agency, has analyzed the proposed Project and has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) as proposed by the environmental assessment for the Project;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Sanger did conduct a duly noticed public hearing in the Council Chambers of the Sanger City Hall in Sanger, California, on November 10, 2025, to consider a recommendation of approval to the City Council for GPA 2025-01, ZOA 2025-02, and the MND prepared for the Project, at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and adopted a resolution providing contingent approval of TTM 2025-01 and CUP 2025- 02 (subject to the City Council adopting a resolution and ordinance approving the aforementioned recommended applications and MND), at which time all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence; and
199
01484.0005 2077415.1
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to approve GPA 2025-01, and the MND.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Sanger as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds that all of the facts set forth in the recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein.
Section 2. CEQA. The City Council pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, the City, as the Lead Agency, has analyzed the proposed Project and has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration as described above to evaluate the environmental effects of the Project, including development of the proposed tentative map area and all related entitlements, etc. The City Council finds that the Project is not located on a site which is included on any of the lists enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code including, but not limited to, lists of hazardous waste facilities, land designated as hazardous waste property, hazardous waste disposal sites and others, and the information in the Ha zardous Waste and Substance Statement required under subdivision (f) of that Section. Additionally, the proposed Project will not result in any adverse effects which fall within the “Mandatory Findings of Significance” contained in Section 15065 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Finally, with the mitigation imposed, there is no substantial evidence in the record that this Project may have any direct, indirect, or cumulative effects on the environment that are significant.
Section 3. Adoption of MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Based on the foregoing, the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project, including the associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The City of Sanger Community Development Department located at 1700 7th Street, Sanger, CA, 93657, is designated as the custodian of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision is based. The City Council authorize s the Director, or designee, to execute and file with the Fresno County Clerk, as appropriate, a Notice of Determination for approval of the Project.
Section 4. General Plan Findings for GPA 2025-01. The City Council finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Sanger General Plan. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the 2035 General Plan and the City’s Housing Element. Although the amendment reduces planned residential density on the project site, the City maintains sufficient residential capacity to meet its RHNA obligations. Compact residential development is achieved through efficient site design, infrastructure utilization, and neighborhood connectivity, rather than density alone. The amendment represents a reasonable, site-specific refinement of the City’s land use framework and does not undermine the 2035 General Plan’s overall housing or growth objectives.
Section 5. Approval of GPA 2025- 01. For all of the reasons set forth above, t he City Council approves GPA 2025-01 as shown in Exhibit “A”.
Section 6. This Resolution shall become immediately effective upon adoption.
200
01484.0005 2077415.1
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The foregoing was considered by the City Council of the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15th day of January 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lina Martinez, City Clerk
201
R-MD
R-MD
R-MD R-MD
OS
R-MD
NORTH AVE
WALTON AVE WALTON AVE WALTON AVE
BREHLER AVE
LYON AVE
RICHARD AVE
GEORGE AVEWALTON AVE
MOIR AVE
LYON AVE
GREENWOOD AVE
332-090-03
Existing Land Use Map
City of Sanger
0 300150
Feet
O
Sanger General Plan Land Use
Residential - Medium Density
Park / Open Space
Parcel In Question
Path: F:\2025\25-188\GIS\25-188.aprx
202
R-MD R-MD
R-MD
R-MD R-MD
OS
R-MD
R-MD
R-MLD
NORTH AVE
WALTON AVE WALTON AVE WALTON AVE
BREHLER AVE
LYON AVE
RICHARD AVE
GEORGE AVEWALTON AVE
MOIR AVE
LYON AVE
GREENWOOD AVE
332-090-03
New Land Use Map
City of Sanger
0 300150
Feet
O
Sanger General Plan Land Use
Park / Open Space
Residential - Medium Density
Residential - Medium Low Density
Parcel In Question
Path: F:\2025\25-188\GIS\25-188.aprx
203
01484.0005 2077401.1
ATTACHMENT 2
204
01484.0005 2077428.1
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER ADOPTING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2025-02, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP, REZONING REAL PROPERTY FROM THE “R-1-6” ((SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT TO THE “R-1-7.5” (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
DISTRICT, FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY BOUNDED BY NORTH AVENUE
TO THE NORTH, BETHEL AVENUE TO THE WEST, AND GREENWOOD AVENUE TO THE EAST, APN 332-090-03, AT 2431 JENSEN AVE, CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 9.97 ACRES.
WHEREAS, the applicant, DR Horton on behalf of property owner James F. Cook and Stacey M. Cook, Co- Trustees of their Successors in Trust of the James F. and Stacey M. Cook Revocable Living Trust of 2016, dated June 23, 2016, submitted an application for Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2025-02, to rezone real property generally bounded by North Avenue to the north, Bethel Avenue to the west, and Greenwood Avenue to the east, (APN: 332- 090-03) from the R-1-6 ( Single Family Residential) zone district to the R-1-7.5 ( Single Family Residential) zone district; and
WHEREAS, the applicant also submitted an application for General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2025-01 to redesignate the General Plan Land Use of 9.97 acres currently designated as Residential - Medium Density Land Use to the Residential – Medium Low Density Land Use; and WHEREAS, California Land Use Regulations require zoning to be consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Sanger did conduct a public meeting in the Council Chambers of the Sanger City Hall in Sanger, California, on November 10, 2025, to consider ZOA 2025-02 as well as GPA 2025-01; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve Z OA 2025-02 and GPA 2025-01, by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-08 at the aforementioned public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance Amendment intended to facilitate consistency between the existing use and the zoning district is considered a “project” by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the City has conducted an environmental analysis of the project, including the associated entitlement applications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sanger has also conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider approval of Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment No. 2025-02, and after all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, the City Council now desires to adopt Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment No. 2025-02. 205
01484.0005 2077428.1
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Sanger does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds that all of the facts set forth in the recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein.
Section 2. CEQA. Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, the City, as the Lead Agency, has analyzed the proposed Project, including GPA 2025-01 and ZOA 2025-02 and has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration as described above to evaluate the environmental effects of the Project, including development of the proposed tentative map area . The Mitigated Negative Declaration was concurrently adopted for the Project by the City Council by separate resolution. As such, the City Council finds ZOA 2025-02 and the associated entitlements for the entire Project area has already been fully assessed in accordance with CEQA, no subsequent review is required under CEQA Guidelines section 15162 as none of those conditions have been met, and no further action or review is required under CEQA.
Section 3. Zoning Amendment Consistency. The City Council finds that the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Sanger General Plan as amended. In this regard, the City Council finds that public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practices justify adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02.
Specifically, the change of zoning districts is consistent with the General Plan goals and policies, any operative plan, or adopted policy, and specifically implements the planned land uses in the General Plan. (See also General Plan p. 2-38.) The changes are also consistent with the purpose of the Development Code to promote the growth of the City in an orderly and sustainable manner, and to promote and protect public health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare. The change is also necessary for good zoning practices to achieve the balance of land uses desired by the City and to provide sites for housing, consistent with the General Plan. The update is also consistent with the 2035 General Plan as updated by General Plan Amendment No. 2025-01.
Section 4. Approval. The City Council adopts this O rdinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2025-02 as set forth in Exhibit “A” to this Ordinance.
Section 5. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions, or applications of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the thirty -first (31st) day after its adoption.
206
01484.0005 2077428.1
Section 7. Publication. The City Clerk is authorized to cause this ordinance or a summary of this ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Sanger, within fifteen days after its adoption. If a summary of the ordinance is published, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted at City Hall at least five days prior to the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which it is adopted.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Sanger held on January 15, 2026, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on February 5, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lina Martinez, City Clerk
207
01484.0005 2077428.1
Exhibit A
Change of Zone Districts
Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2025-02
APN 332-090-03
208
RM-1
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
RSC
RM-2.5
RM-2.5
NORTH AVE
WALTON AVE WALTON AVE WALTON AVE
BREHLER AVE
LYON AVE
RICHARD AVE
GEORGE AVEWALTON AVE
MOIR AVE
LYON AVE
GREENWOOD AVE
332-090-03
Existing Zoning Map
City of Sanger
0 300150
Feet
O
Zoning
R-1-6
RM-1 RM-2.5 RSC
Path: F:\2025\25-188\GIS\25-188.aprx
209
RM-1
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
R-1-6
RSC
RM-2.5
RM-2.5
R-1-7.5
NORTH AVE
WALTON AVE WALTON AVE WALTON AVE
BREHLER AVE
LYON AVE
RICHARD AVE
GEORGE AVEWALTON AVE
MOIR AVE
LYON AVE
GREENWOOD AVE
332-090-03
New Zoning Map
City of Sanger
0 300150
Feet
O
Zoning
R-1-6
R-1-7.5
RM-1
RM-2.5
RSC
Parcel In Question
Path: F:\2025\25-188\GIS\25-188.aprx
210
01484.0005 2077401.1
ATTACHMENT 3
211
HEIDI AVENUE
LYON AVENUE
CATHERINE AVENUE
LIME AVENUE
HUNTER AVENUE
NORTH AVENUE
4 19
20 17
16 15
14 13
12 9
8 18
10 11
21 5
4 24
23 22
19 20
28 29
25 26
17 16
15 14
13 12
9 8
34 35
40 39 38
41 45
46 44
47 18
10 11
27 21
5 1
2 17
16 1
55 54
53 52
51 50
49 48
47 46
45 44
43 42
41 2
40 HEIDI AVENUE
DIAMOND AVENUE
GEORGE AVENUE
112
117
118
127
128
137
138
147
3 48
43 6
7 42
36 32
31 33
30 37
N
TENTATIVE TRACT NO.
6531
SERENADE II
N
TRACT 6431
BOOK 94, OF MAPS
AT PAGE 83 THRU 87,
F.C.R.
212
01484.0005 2077401.1
ATTACHMENT 4
213
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION
2220 Tulare Street, Sixth Floor / Fresno, California 93721 / Phone (559) 600-4497 / 600-4022 / 600-4545 / FAX 600-4200 The County of Fresno is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING
STEVEN E. WHITE, DIRECTOR
August 29, 2025
Derek Sylvester, Senior Planner
City of Sanger, Community Development Department
1700 7
th Street Sanger CA, 93657
SUBJECT: City of Sanger TTM 6531 Draft IS and MND
Dear Mr. Sylvester,
The County of Fresno appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the subject project being reviewed by the City of Sanger; the proposed annexation and Rezone of approximately
54.2 acres for the development of 185 residential lots and future commercial development
The documents received for this review were circulated to our various Fresno County Public Works and Planning divisions. See comments below.
Fresno County Environmental Health:
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• If any underground petroleum storage tank(s) are discovered during future construction activities, the applicant/property owner shall apply for and secure an Underground Storage Tank Removal Permit from the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division. Contact the Fresno County Hazmat Compliance Program at (559) 600-3271 for more information.
Hydrology and Water Quality
• As a measure to protect groundwater, all water wells (not intended for use) and septic systems within the project area shall be properly destroyed by an appropriately licensed contractor. Contact the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Water Surveillance Program at (559) 600-3357 for more information.
Noise
• Future projects have the potential to expose nearby residents to elevated noise levels. Consideration should be given to conformance with the applicable standards of the Noise Elements of the City of Sanger and the Fresno County Ordinance Code.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (559) 600-3271.
Kevin Tsuda, R.E.H.S.
Environmental Health Specialist III
Environmental Health Division
214
City of Sanger