Agenda packet — Santa Ana City Council, April 2, 2024 (part 3 of 5)

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The proliferation of online vacation rental websites such as Airbnb.com and vrbo.com have encouraged and enabled property owners, tenants, and occupants to rent their local, residential properties on a short-term basis to travelers or transients. These STRs, generally numbering less than 30 days, are often associated with excessive noise, parking problems, trash, and degradation of a neighborhood’s residential character.

Data collected from various STR platforms reveals that there are more than 1,100 active STR units across Santa Ana. Areas like Downtown and its nearby neighborhoods, along with the Hutton Center area, have a higher concentration of these rentals. To put this in perspective, the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for 2021-2029 is 3,137 permanent housing units. The 1,100 short-term rental units represent about 35% of the City's housing needs, diverting a significant portion of available housing away from permanent residents.

As a result of the reduction in available housing for permanent residents, the negative secondary effects including, but not limited to, excessive noise, parking problems, and trash, the urgency ordinance is necessary as an emergency measure to preserve the public peace, health, safety, and welfare. The adoption of the urgency ordinance will require two-thirds (2/3) approval by the City Council.

Presently, there are 112 confirmed active cases of STRs that have received enforcement notices and citations. Among these cases, 36 involve owners residing at the same address, while 84 involve properties owned by an LLC, managed by a property management company, or owned by absentee owners. Enforcement efforts in the City have primarily relied on complaints and proactive notifications to major STR platforms.

STRs are not, and have never been, a permitted use under the City’s zoning code.

Therefore, STRs have always been prohibited by the City and this urgency ordinance and first reading of an ordinance are reaffirming existing law. However, in response to recent legal developments, this urgency ordinance and first reading of ordinance seek to amend the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to expressly prohibit short-term rentals in alignment with the City’s current practice.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed action.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The proposed ordinances are not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the City Council 21 – 2 4/2/2024
Short-Term Rentals Ordinances
April 2, 2024

Page 3 ends

environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project.

EXHIBITS

1. Urgency Ordinance

2. Ordinance for First Reading
Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Tom Hatch, Interim City Manager
City Council 21 – 3 4/2/2024
Urgency Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Page 1 of 6 ends

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO CHARTER SECTIONS 415 AND 417 ADDING ARTICLE XXI TO CHAPTER 8 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE

PROHIBITING SHORT-TERM RENTALS
WHEREAS, the proliferation of online vacation rental websites such as Airbnb.com and vrbo.com have encouraged and enabled City of Santa Ana (“City”) property owners, tenants, and occupants to rent their local, residential properties on a short-term rental (“STR”) basis to travelers or transients; and,
WHEREAS, these short-term rentals, generally numbering less than 30 days, are often associated with excessive noise, parking problems, trash, and degradation of a neighborhood’s residential character; and,
WHEREAS, the City has received numerous complaints from residents about the negative secondary effects of short-term rental uses in their residential neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, Short-term rentals also remove housing stock that could otherwise be available for long-term rental or for sale. Data collected from various STR platforms reveals that there are more than 1,100 active STR units across Santa Ana. The City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for 2021-2029 is 3,137 permanent housing units. The 1,100 STRs represent about 35% of the City’s housing needs, diverting a significant portion of available housing away from permanent residents; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41-190(a), the Zoning Code (Chapter 41 of the SAMC) is a permissive ordinance, meaning that those uses expressly listed in the Zoning Code are permissible, and those not listed are prohibited.

WHEREAS, at present, the SAMC does not list STRs as an approved use in any zoning district, making them prohibited and unauthorized under the current enforcement practice afforded by Section 41-190(a).

WHEREAS, recent court rulings have brought into question the City’s ability to rely on the aforementioned section of the Zoning Code in specifically addressing STRs through the Code Enforcement process.

WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Municipal Code (“SAMC”) does not expressly address shortterm rentals in residential zoning districts. However, because short-term rentals are not expressly permitted in residential zoning districts under the SAMC, such transient uses are prohibited; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the SAMC to expressly prohibit shortterm rentals within the City, to reaffirm existing law, and to preserve the residential character of City neighborhoods and stem the negative, secondary effects caused by those uses; and, City Council 21 – 4 4/2/2024
Urgency Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Page 2 of 6 ends

WHEREAS, in response to recent legal developments, this urgency ordinance seeks to amend the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to prohibit short-term rentals in alignment with the SAMC's current practice and expectation, as well as compliance with recent court decisions; and,
WHEREAS, there currently exists over 100 confirmed active cases of STRs that have ongoing enforcement notices and violations;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Santa Ana City Charter sections 415 and 417, based on the above findings, this Ordinance is declared by the City Council to be necessary as an emergency measure to protect and preserve the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Santa Ana and will become effective immediately if passed by the affirmative votes of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the City Council. The City Council hereby finds that there is an urgent need to adopt these regulations in order to address the current and immediate threats set forth above.

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety, and welfare to expressly prohibit short-term rentals within the City and to declare such uses as a public nuisance punishable under the SAMC.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true, correct and each incorporated herein by reference and adopted as findings by the Santa Ana City Council (“City Council”) SECTION 2. Addition. Article XXI (Sections 8-3400 – 8-3402) is hereby added to Chapter 8 of the SAMC to read as follows:

ARTICLE XXI. – SHORT-TERM RENTALS
Sec. 8-3400. – Definitions.

The definitions set forth in this Section shall govern the application and interpretation of this Article:
(a) Home-sharing rental means the rental of a dwelling unit, or portion thereof, to a person or group of persons, for compensation whether monetary or otherwise, for lodging or sleeping purposes for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive calendar days while at least one of the dwelling unit’s owners lives on-site, in the dwelling unit, throughout the visitors’ stay. (b) Short-term or vacation rental means the rental to a person or group of persons of a dwelling unit, or portion thereof, for compensation whether monetary or otherwise, for lodging or sleeping purposes for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive calendar days without concurrently being occupied by the property owner.

Sec. 8-3401. -Prohibited.

City Council 21 – 5 4/2/2024
Urgency Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Page 3 of 6 ends

It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to: offer or make available for rent (via advertisement on a short-term or vacation rental website or otherwise) or to rent (by way of a rental agreement, lease, sublease, license, via a short-term or vacation rental website, or any other means, whether oral or written) for compensation or consideration a home-sharing rental, short-term or vacation rental for less than 30 days, pursuant to a rental agreement, lease, sublease, license, via a shortterm or vacation rental website, or any other means, whether oral or written, for compensation or consideration, or maintain any advertisement of a home-sharing rental, short-term or vacation rental for less than 30 consecutive days.

Sec. 8-3402. -Violation; nuisance.

Any violation of this Article is unlawful, is hereby declared a public nuisance, and constitutes a misdemeanor punishable as set forth in Chapter 1 of the SAMC section 1-8. At the discretion of the City Attorney, a violation of this Article may be prosecuted as an infraction or misdemeanor.

In any civil action brought pursuant to this Article, a court of competent jurisdiction may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 1-21, the City may issue an administrative citation for any violation of this Article. Such administrative remedy may be exercised in place of, or in addition to, any administrative, criminal, civil, or equitable remedy allowed by law.

SECTION 3. Urgency Findings. In accordance with Santa Ana City Charter Sections 415 and 417 and necessary as an emergency measure for preserving the public peace, health, safety, and welfare, the City Council finds as follows:

A. The rise of short-term rentals within the City has become a public nuisance that has caused numerous complaints from residents about the negative secondary effects such as excessive noise, parking problems, trash, and degradation of residential zoning districts. The City Council, therefore, adopts this Urgency Ordinance to become effective immediately upon adoption pursuant to Santa Ana City Charter section 417 and to remain in effect until rescinded to prohibit short-term rentals within the City and provide City enforcement officials with a means to enforce the newly enacted Article.

B. The City wishes to have these new regulations immediately in place to preserve the residential characteristics of residential zoning districts and to mitigate the harm to the residential zoning districts that result from short-term rentals.

C. The City Council further finds that this Urgency Ordinance is necessary as an emergency measure for preserving the public peace, health, safety and welfare by prohibiting short-term rentals within the City.

D. Finally, the City Council finds that the regulations contained in this Urgency Ordinance are reasonable in order to preserve the public health, safety and welfare of its residents.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phase, or portion City Council 21 – 6 4/2/2024
Urgency Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Page 4 of 6 ends

of this Urgency Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Urgency Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Urgency Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. CEQA Determination. The City Council finds that this Urgency Ordinance is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. Pursuant to Charter Section 417(d), this Urgency Ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The City Council finds that this Urgency Ordinance is necessary as an emergency measure for preserving the public peace, health, safety, and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 3, A-D, inclusive of this Urgency Ordinance.

SECTION 7. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Urgency Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.

ADOPTED this ___ day of ___________________, 2024.
_______________________
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
City Council 21 – 7 4/2/2024
Urgency Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Page 5 of 6 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
_______________________________
Brandon Salvatierra
Deputy City Attorney

AYES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: ________________________________________ City Council 21 – 8 4/2/2024
Urgency Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Page 6 of 6 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NSXXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _________________, 2024.

Date: ________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
City Council 21 – 9 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Page 1 of 5 ends

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING ARTICLE XXI TO CHAPTER 8 OF THE SANTA

ANA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING SHORT-TERM RENTALS
WHEREAS, the proliferation of online vacation rental websites such as Airbnb.com and vrbo.com have encouraged and enabled City of Santa Ana (“City”) property owners, tenants, and occupants to rent their local, residential properties on a short-term rental (“STR”) basis to travelers or transients; and,
WHEREAS, these short-term rentals, generally numbering less than 30 days, are often associated with excessive noise, parking problems, trash, and degradation of a neighborhood’s residential character; and,
WHEREAS, the City has received numerous complaints from residents about the negative secondary effects of short-term rental uses in their residential neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, Short-term rentals also remove housing stock that could otherwise be available for long-term rental or for sale. Data collected from various STR platforms reveals that there are more than 1,100 active STR units across Santa Ana. The City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for 2021-2029 is 3,137 permanent housing units. The 1,100 STRs represent about 35% of the City’s housing needs, diverting a significant portion of available housing away from permanent residents; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41-190(a), the Zoning Code (Chapter 41 of the SAMC) is a permissive ordinance, meaning that those uses expressly listed in the Zoning Code are permissible, and those not listed are prohibited.

Page 2 of 5 ends

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE XXI. – SHORT-TERM RENTALS
Sec. 8-3400. – Definitions.

Sec. 8-3401. -Prohibited.

Page 3 of 5 ends

rental for less than 30 consecutive days.

Sec. 8-3402. -Violation; nuisance.

SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. CEQA Determination. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 6. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.

ADOPTED this ___ day of ___________________, 2024.
_______________________
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
City Council 21 – 12 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Page 4 of 5 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
_______________________________
Brandon Salvatierra
Deputy City Attorney

Page 5 of 5 ends

Date: ________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
City Council 21 – 14 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Jennifer Leiva <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: Against theSTRBan byZoning & Planning
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Hello
MynameisJenniferLeiva, IliveinWard3andhavebeenanSTRoperatorinthecityofSantaAnaforthepast4years.

OutrightbanningSTRsinthecitywouldbecuttingoffrevenuethatcangobackintothecityandcommunity.

Pleasedonotgeneralize alloperators because ofacoupleofbadapples. Forthemostpart, themajorityofushostsare forcomplyingwithregulations andzoningbutyourzoningandplanningdepartment mustbewillingtosetreasonable regulations. Iknowit’saddedworktoanalreadybusydepartment buttherevenuethatcanbereceivedfromsetting intoplacecertainregulationsandpermitswillbenefitsomany.

Utilizeusoperators ifyouhaveanyquestions, mostofusarewillingandabletohelpworkwiththecityforinsight. Ifor onehaveworkedwithnumerous zoningandplanningdepartments andwouldbehappytoalsoworkwithyour department soseewhatyourconcerns areandhowwecaneasethoseconcerns settingsomecodesthat’llbenefitall.

ApartfromoperatingSTRsIprovidealotofworktoseverallocalsmallbusinesses fromACtechs, plumbing, to handymen, etc. BybanningSTRsyouareselfishlystoppingafamiliesincomeandstatetaxesfromgoingbackintothe stateandcommunity; weallpaytaxes.

ThemajorityofthoseIemployarepaidgreatandtheworkschedule workswellwiththeirchildren’sschedulesothat theyareabletoprovideandstillspendtimewiththeirfamily.

AgainpleasethinkofthedominoeffectbanningSTRswillcauseamongstthecommunity. AllourhiresarelocalandIas wellamaresidentofthecity.

Pleasereachouttomeifyouneedanythingorhaveanyquestions.

Thankyou!
JenniferLeiva
2 City Council 21 – 15 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Daniel Nehrbass <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: item21, emergency prohibiting Shorttermrentals Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearCityofSantaAna,
Wearelow-incomeresidentsofcolorwholiveinSantaAna.

Wearenotabletoaffordourmortgage withoutsupplemental income.

OnewaywehavebeenabletoweatherthestormsinceCOVIDistorentoutoneroomofourhouseonAirBNB.

Wehavehadawonderful experience andhaveneverhadadisrespectful guest.

Wearenotrentingoutourwholehouseforparties…werentoneroomofthehomeourmulti-generational familylives in.

Weaskthatyouconsider peoplelikeuswhenyouvoteonthisdecision.

Daniel Nehrbass
4 City Council 21 – 16 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Catherine Manzano <cymprocessing@gmail. com>
Sent: Thursday, March28,
To: eComment
Subject: Item21 - Emergency Prohibiting Short-TermRentals Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Towhomitmayconcern,
Iamwritingwithregardstotheabove-mentioned itemandwouldliketovoicemyopposition totheprohibition:

Sincebecoming anoperatorof4short-termrentalsinthedowntown cityofSantaAnain2021, therehasbeenaninflux oftravelers stayingintheareawhichhasbeenahugeincomegenerator forthemanylocalbusinesses. Downtown Santa Anaisthriving. Withtheadditiontothetrolleycurrentlybeingconstructed, theareaofdowntownSantaAnawillsee evenmoretouristswhichmeansbusiness revenue andthiscreatemoreforjobsforthecity.

Additionally, withthecitythrivingandgrowing, thisallowscityrestoration, withmanynewhousingprojectsand retailersopening upwhichisalwaysapositive.

Iftherewouldbeanyordinances onshort-termrentals, Iwouldsupportanimplement shorttermrentalzoningareas andplacealimit/capofthenumberofrentalsperSTRoperator/ownerandaffidavittooperatefornon-owner operators. Thiswouldhelpalleviatejustanyoneand/orinexperienced operators fromopeningupaSTRandhelp preventissuesthatmayaffectlongtermnonSTRresidents livinginthecommunity.

Thankyouforyourconsideration.

BestRegards,
Catherine Manzano
SentfrommyiPhone
5 City Council 21 – 17 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Aminguyen <aminguyen2018@gmail. com>
Sent: Thursday,
To: eComment
Subject: ShortTermRentalHost
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Towhomthismayconcern,
Unfortunately, Iwon’tbeallowedtoattendthemeeting, butIwouldliketosharemyvoice. Pleaseallowustocontinue hostingourhouseonAirbnbforshorttermrental. Myfamilyof8isdepending onthisincometomakealiving. Ihave4 kidsandmyparentsareintheir80sandonehasdementia.

Wepayourtaxeseveryyear. Wemaintainverycleanandcomfortable roomsfortheguesttolivein. Myemployees also dependonthismoneytosupporttheirfamilysincetheydon’tspeakEnglishandit’shardtofindanotherjob. Ifthisis takenfrommeIwouldhavetoapplyforlowincome. Idon’twanttobeaburdentomycountry. Pleaseallowusto continuehostingourhousetosupports ourfamily.

AmiNguyen
1 City Council 21 – 18 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: SheriMenke <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: VoteNOonagenda item #21forTuesday April2, 2024 Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearCityCouncil Members,
Thank youforallthatyoudoforourcommunity! Please voteNOonagenda item #21fortheCityCouncil meeting scheduled Tuesday April2, 2024. Iamappalled bythestaffrecommendation toprohibit shortterm rentals inSanta Ana. Theproposal wasbrought forthwithout inputfromlocalresidents andisnowbeing rushed through thecouncil. Myself andothers have beenworking foroverayearonasensible taxed and regulated program forshorttermrentals. Please reject thisproposal andworkwithusforthebestinterest of SantaAna!
Anurgent ordinance banning shorttermrentals would notbeaneffective orappropriate response towhatthe people ofSantaAnawant/need. Acitywide banwould alsobeahuge lossofpotential revenue forthecity. In September of2022 theissuewasplaced ontheplanning commission agenda. Notoneresident ofSanta Anaat thatmeeting supported aban, rather they/wesupport ataxed andregulated STRprogram. Theitemwasmoved offtheagenda thatevening andweweretoldbyBaoPham, underthedirection ofMinhThai, thatwhen the itemwasbackontheagenda wewould benotified. Thathasnothappened. Thisisoneofthereasons you should voteNOonitem #21. Weasoperators/small business owners should haveanopportunity tospeak, meet withstaff andshare ourexperiences before asignificant ordinance isvoted onbythecitycouncil.

InDecember of2023theissuewasbackontheagenda asatopic forastudy session. Weasowners/operators werenotable tospeak during thesession, which isagain whyyoushould voteNOonitem #21atthistime.

None ofthecommissioners thatevening wereinfavorofabanandtherewerenopublic comments speaking against STR’satthebeginning ofthemeeting. Itagain isnotanurgent issue inthecityandshould be considered withclearandaccurate research andinformation.

Ihaveowned andoperated anSTR inthecityforthepast7years andhavehadabusiness license issued bythe citythisentire time. Ihaveadocument insupport ofmySTRthatissigned byevery homeowner whoshares myproperty line. Iamhappy toshare thatdocument withyou. Thisisevidence thatSTR’sarenotanuisance andcanbeahugeasset toanycommunity! Iemploy andpayafairwage toatleast4residents ofSanta Anaon aregular basis. Imyself wasemployed bya neighbor whowasoperating anAirbnb forafewyears. Iwasthe mother of5veryyoung children atthetimeand theincome wasmonumental asitisdifficult forawoman with children tofindemployment. Iloved livingnexttoaSTR, itbrought somuch tomylifehearing people’s stories, providing abeautiful andsafeplace forthemtostayastheyexplored Orange County orwenttoaworld renowned medical center.

Ipersonally havespent thepasttwoyears researching andmeeting withleaders inthecitiesofOrange, Huntington Beach andLongBeach. Allofthese cities havesuccessful programs forshortterm rentals. Owners/operators haveworked withthecitytoenforce regulations andthesecities aremoving to expand their programs andevenloosen some restrictions because ofthesuccesses. This ismyhopeforSanta Ana! These programs havecreated much needed revenue tohelpwiththecity’sbudgets, theyhave helped to eliminate problems withirresponsible owners andtheyhave helped create jobsforlocalresidents through 2 City Council 21 – 19 4/2/2024
tourism, cleaning services andmore. There aremany sensible options forshort termrentals otherthana citywide ban, please voteNOonitem #21andworkwithus!
There isnoneed foranurgent ordinance based onthesafety ofcommunities. Short termrentals havebeen allowed inSantaAnaforover10years. Ihaveafamily of7with5being children. Iampassionate about short termrentals because itisthemostaffordable andrational wayformyfamily totravelforbothpleasure andfor necessity. People needoptions when theytravel asweliveinadiverse worldwithdiverse families and situations! When Ifoundoutthatmyneighbor wasrunning aSTRIwasn’tthrilled, buttheexperience was life changing! Sharing SantaAnawithothers andhelping themexperience andlearnabout theamazing citythat SantaAnaiscanonlybedone withyour help!
Below isarecentreview fromaguestwhostayed atmySTR. Inthereview youwillclearly seethatataxed and regulated program iswhatSantaAnaneeds ratherthanaban! Wehave theairport, Disneyland, beaches, culture andsomuch more thattravelers wanttoexperience! Youhavetheopportunity tovotedown thisurgent ordinance andhelptocreate anordinance thatwouldbemuchmore effective andbeneficial foreveryone!! I hopetobeoneoftheleaders thatcanworkwithyouandothers tomakethathappen! Thank youforyourtimeandconsideration tovoteNOonagenda item #21! IwillseeyouTuesday! Best,
Sheri
Review fromarecent guest…
Thiswasmyfirsttimestaying inSantaAnaandwow, what agame changer. Weusually stayinAnaheim for Disneyland, butwe'reextremely happyweopted forSantaAnathistimearound. Sheri, theproperty manager, wasabsolutely amazing fromstarttofinish. Shewasquick torespond toany communications wehadandwas veryeasy toworkwith. Theneighborhood thishouse issituated inisGORGEOUS. Youcantelleveryone inin theareatrulytakes prideintheirhomes andproperties. Thehouse itselfwasevenbetterthanthepictures advertised. Thebackyard wasgorgeous, thekitchen waslarge, therooms andbathrooms werespacious. Not onlywerethebasic necessities included, butSheri tookitastepfurther andhadaBritawater pitcher inthe fridge, icecubes, creamer pods, K-cuppods, snacks, etc. It'slittlethings likethat, thatreallygoalongwayand issoveryappreciated. Would definitely lovetostayhereinagain inthefuture. Thank yousomuch forsucha wonderful stay!
Dateofarrival - March 3, 2024
I’maSantaAnaresident whoshares myhome tosupplement myincome. Irelyonhome sharing to make endsmeetandsupport thecity’stourism economy.

Iamappalled bythePlanning Director’srecommendation toprohibit home sharing inSantaAna Thisproposal wasbrought forthwithout inputfromlocalresidents, andisnowbeing rushed through the council
Weneedmore timetoconsider reasonable alternatives thatwillallowHosts likemetocontinue hosting.

Please reject theproposal andwork withthelocal community onasensible plan 3 City Council 21 – 20 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: ThuTran <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday,
To: Lopez, Jessie; eComment
Subject: Fwd: STRLegal correspondence regarding 2108AlonaSt Attachments: Cease andDesistletter.pdf; STRDocstoSantaAna.pdf Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

HiMr. Lopez,
I'velearned thattheplanning commission isgoing totryagain tobanshort-termrentalattheApril2meeting on Tuesday. Please voteNOonitem #21onthemeeting agenda.

ThuTran
Forwarded message ---------
From: ThuTran <
PM
Subject: Re: STR Legal correspondence regarding 2108AlonaSt To: <mcarvalho@santa- ana.org>, jessielopez@santa- ana.org <jessielopez@santa- ana.org>, schampion@santaana.org <schampion@santa- ana.org>, <vamezcua@santa- ana.org> Cc: Scott James Street <sstreet@jwhowardattorneys. com> DearMr. Carvalho,
Ijustreceived another Cease andDesist letterregarding my2108Alona property. Incaseyou'renotaware, we justwentthrough thisafewmonths agoandmyhearing gotcanceled atlast. Seebelow.

I'veattached thelegal correspondence thatmylawyer senttotheCityinOctober foryourreference. Iwould appreciate youforwarding ittotheCity’slawyer, too. Once again, Ihavesecured alegalcounsel should theDept choose tofinemeafter sending meacease anddesist letter. We'llfilealawsuit toenjoin theCity'sunlawful practices andseektorecover legalfeesanddamages.

ThuTran
PMDiaz, Jorge < wrote:

Helloeveryone,
th Theappeal hearing forOctober 26 hasbeentakenoffcalendar untilfurther notice, beadvised. 1 City Council 21 – 21 4/2/2024
Thank you,
JorgeDiaz
Senior OfficeAssistant
CityofSantaAna | Planning andBuilding Agency
20CivicCenter Plaza | SantaAna, CA92702
714) 667-2783 | JDiaz10@santa- ana.org
www.santa-ana.org/pb
ThemySantaAnamobileappputsthepoweroftheSantaAnacitygovernmentinthepalmofyourhand! ThefreeappallowsresidentstoquicklyandeasilyreportissuestotheCity, accessCityservices, andfindnewsandevents.

DownloadtheApp:

From: ScottJamesStreet <sstreet@jwhowardattorneys. com> Sent: Friday, October20, 202312:48PM
To: Verino, Sergio <[email protected]>
Cc: Adminhearing <[email protected]>
Subject: Legalcorrespondence regarding 2108NAlonaSt
Importance: High
DearMr. Verino -- Pleaseseetheattachedcorrespondence regarding thismatter. Iwouldappreciate youforwarding it totheCity’slawyer, too.

Best,
ScottStreet 2
City Council 21 – 22 4/2/2024
ScottJ. Street
JWHowardAttorneysLtd.
201SouthLakeAvenue, Suite303
Pasadena, CA91101
213) 205-2800
sstreet@jwhowardattorneys. com
3 City Council 21 – 23 4/2/2024
MAYOR
Valerie Amezcua

MAYOR PRO TEM
Thai Viet Phan

COUNCILMEMBERS
Phil Bacerra
Johnathan Ryan Hernandez
Jessie Lopez
David Penaloza
Benjamin Vazquez
February 12, 2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA

PLANNING AND BUILDING AGENCY
20 Civic Center Plaza • P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
Www. santa- arta. ora
Thu Vu Luc Tran & Tam Xuan Nguyen
San Diego, CA 92126- 8000
Re: Short -Term Rental Property- CEASE AND DESIST Notification Dear Thu Vu Luc Tran & Tam Xuan Nguyen,

INTERIM CITY MANAGER
Tom Hatch

CITY ATTORNEY
Sonia R. Carvalho

CITY CLERK
Jennifer L. Hall
It has come to our attention that your property located at 2108 Alona St., is advertised as an unpermitted short- term rental in the City of Santa Ana.

This letter is to advise you that short- term rentals are not allowed in the City of Santa Ana. The City' s Zoning Code, outlined in Chapter 41 is permissive, meaning uses that are not explicitly enumerated as permitted are prohibited. ( SAMC 41- 190{ a) - General restrictions) Short-term rentals are not identified in the City' s zoning code as a permitted use and are therefore prohibited.

Please consider this letter written notice that the City prohibits these types of uses. The zoning ordinance places limits on the use of properties in order to promote the welfare and preserve the property values of all the residents in the City of Santa Ana. In as much, as you may have been unaware of our municipal and zoning codes, this letter is to request that you discontinue and remove the advertisement of the unpermitted short- term rental and cease and desist within fifteen days ( 15) calendar days from the transmittal date of this notification.

Your prompt attention to this matter will prevent the City from taking any further enforcement action.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Code Enforcement Officer Toni Carvalho at (714) 667- 2795 or mcarvalho@santa- ana. org.

Sincerely,"-fl!
RI
Alvafo Pfunez Assistant Director
Planning and Building Agency

SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL
Valerie Amezcua Thai Viet Phan Benjamin Vazquez Jens# LWL Phil Bacetra Johnathan Ryan Hen dez David Penaloza Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 3 Ward 4 Ward 5 Ward Y2CC6Ji R7ir^ lJ rdPM Wi; n* 5artdon; QM tYl} F kri3i3. sarparavro lassb. 00azn7sarr.aria. aruWV~ llftftla City Council 21 – 24 4/2/2024
HOWARD

AT T O RN E Y S
JOHN W. HOWARD*
SCOTT J. STREET
ANDREW G. NAGURNEY
MICHELLE D. VOLK
KRISTIN J. WRIGHT
Chief Operating Officer
Also Admitted:

Colorado*
Nevada**
October 20, 2023
Sergio Verino
Code Enforcement Principal
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Sverino@santa- ana. org
Re: Administrative citation for 2108 North Alona Street Dear Mr. Verino:

MAIN OFFICE:

ONE AMERICA PLAZA
600 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 1400
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
TEL ( 619) 234- 2842
LOS ANGELES OFFICE:
201 S. LAKE AVENUE, SUITE 303
PASADENA, CA 91101
TEL ( 213) 205- 2800
OF COUNSEL:

ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.

FREDERIC L. GORDON
MITCHELL B. STEIN

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
As you know, our firm represents Thu Tran, the owner ofthe real property located at 2108 North Alona Street in Santa Ana (the " Property"). The City issued a citation to Ms. Tran, accusing her of violating the Santa Ana Municipal Code by renting the Property to short-term renters.

According to its citation letter of May 18, 2023, the City contends that " short-term rentals are not allowed in the City of Santa Ana." Exhibit A. The City' s sole legal support for this argument is that its zoning code " is permissive, meaning uses that are not explicitly enumerated as permitted are prohibited." Id. The City contends that, because "[ s] hort- term rentals are not identified in the City' s zoning code as a permitted use" they are " therefore prohibited." (Id.) This position is wrong as a matter of law. In fact, the Court of Appeal addressed the same argument in People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715, 732- 34 ( 2021) (" Venice Suites"). Like here, the City of Los Angeles argued that, because its municipal code did not expressly authorize short-term rentals, they must be prohibited. The court rejected that argument, in part because " no length of occupancy requirement is expressed" in the city' s code. Thus, applying the " permissive zoning" argument to ban rentals of some length (short-term) would 1 City Council 21 – 25 4/2/2024
require banning rentals of all lengths. Id. at 733. The court refused to accept such an absurd result.

Keen v. City ofManhattan Beach, 77 Cal. App. 5th 142 ( 2022), is even more on point. In 2015, Manhattan Beach passed an ordinance banning short-term rentals. In 2019, it adopted an enforcement mechanism for those ordinances. That led the city to cite a property owner ( Keen) for violating the short-term rental ban. Keen sued because the City had not gotten the California Coastal Commission to sign off on the ban, rendering it invalid. The trial court agreed and enjoined enforcement ofthe short-term rental ban. On appeal, the City argued that the short-term rental ban was irrelevant because short-term rentals were not expressly authorized by the city' s zoning code, so, under permissive zoning principles, they had always been banned as a matter of law.

The Court of Appeal rejected Manhattan Beach' s arguments. It noted that " it is legal to build a residential house or an apartment building in the City' s zoning code. Once it is built, you can reside there. Anyone can. This all makes sense. It would be surprising ifit were otherwise." Id. at 149. The court asked: " Why ... are renters allowed in? Because residential renters are common in cities, as everyone knows, and nothing in the ordinance takes the unusual step of banning all renting in the residential areas of the City." Id. "The City' s zoning thus permits you to rent a house or an apartment in Manhattan Beach, which accords with common experience.

The City' s zoning does not regulate how long your stay can be." Id. at 150.

Keen ridiculed Manhattan Beach' s " proposed distinction between long- and short- term rentals — the former always allowed, and the latter always forbidden" as having " no textual or logical basis." Id. And it dispatched the city' s " permissive zoning" argument in one paragraph.

Id.

The same reasoning applies here. Indeed, Santa Ana' s code is materially identical to Manhattan Beach' s code. It allows people to rent homes. It does not regulate the length of occupancy. And renting a property for a short period of time does not alter its use. See Coastal Protection Alliance Inc. v. Airbnb, Inc., 95 Cal. App. 5th 207, 270 (" Applying the reasoning in Keen, where residential zoning code is silent regarding STRs, using a residence as an STR is a residential use, not a change in use, and thus not a development.").

Moreover, Keen recognized an inherent flaw in Manhattan Beach' s argument: if shortterm rentals had always been banned, why did the city need to adopt an ordinance in 2015 banning them? The same flaw exists here, as the City imposed a 45- day moratorium on shortterm rentals in September 2015. Exhibit B. The City Council voted against extending the moratorium and tabled the matter indefinitely, with several council members expressing support for short-term rentals. Exhibit C ( pages 21- 22).

I have attached the opinions in Keen and Venice Suites to this letter as Exhibits D and E.

They are dispositive. They preclude the City from taking further action against Ms. Tran related to the Property.
2 City Council 21 – 26 4/2/2024
I know the City has scheduled an administrative hearing for October 26. But it should not be necessary. Under Keen and Venice Suites, the City is legally precluded from enforcing any short- term rental citations against property owners. Given this binding legal authority, I expect the City to cancel the October 26 hearing and rescind any short- term rental citations regarding the Property. Please let me know by noon on October 25 if that has happened. if not, we will file a lawsuit to overturn the citations and to enjoin the City' s unlawful practices. We will also seek to recover my costs and legal fees.

Please let me know if you would like to discuss this matter further. You may also forward this letter to the City' s lawyer, who I would be happy to talk to. All rights and remedies are expressly reserved.

Very truly yours,
Scott J. Stree
JW HOWARDIATTORNEYS, LTD.
3 City Council 21 – 27 4/2/2024

EXHIBIT A
City Council 21 – 28 4/2/2024
MAYOR
Valerie Amezcua

MAYOR PRO TEM
Jessie Lopez
COUNCI LIME NA.BERS Phil
Bacerra Johnathan
Ryan Hernandez David
Penaloza Thai
Viet Phan Benjamin
Vazquez CITY
OF SANTA ANA Planning
and Building Agency 20
Civic Center Plaza • P. O. Box 1988 Santa
Ana, California 92702 www.
santa-ana.ora May
18, 2023 Thu
Vu Lac Tran & Tam Xuan Nguyen 11561
Prairie Shadow Pt. San
Diego, CA 92126 Re:

Short - Term Rental Property- CEASE AND DESIST NOTIFICATION Dear Property Owners, It
has come toour attention that your property located at 2108 N. Alona St. is advertised as an unpermitted short-term rental in the City of Santa Ana. CITY
MANAGER Kristine
Ridge CITY
ATTORNEY Sonia
R. Carvalho CITY
CLERK Jennifer
L. Hall This
letter isto advise you that short-term rentals arenot allowed inthe City of Santa Ana. The City's Zoning Code, outlined in Chapter 41is permissive, meaning uses that are not explicitly enumerated as permitted areprohibited. ( SAMC 41-190( a) - General restrictions) Short- term rentals are not identified in the City'szoning code as apermitted useand are therefore prohibited. Please consider this letter written notice that the City prohibits these types of uses. The zoning ordinance places limits onthe use of properties inorder topromote the welfare andpreserve theproperty values of all the residents inthe City of Santa Ana. In as much, as you may have been unaware of our municipal andzoning codes, this letter isto request that you discontinue andremove theadvertisement ofthe unpermitted short-term rental and cease and desist within thirty days (30) calendar days from the transmittal date of this notification. Your prompt attention to this matter will prevent the City from! taking any further enforcement action. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Code Enforcement Supervisor Jerry Navarro at 714) 667- 2773 and/ or jnavarro@santa- ana.or>?. Sincerely,
varounez
I Assistant Drector Planning
and Building Agency SANTA
ANA CITY COUNCIL Valene
Amezcua Jessie Lopez Thai Viet Phan Benjamin Vazquez Phil Baeerra Johnathan Ryan Hemandez David Penaloza Mayor Mayor Pro Tem, Ward 3 Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 4 Ward S Ward 6vamezcuatasantaana. ora iessielooez( rJlsanta ana.oro tohan@santa- ana. ora bvazouez santa- ana.ora obace raCo2santa- ana. oro jyanhemandezfdsantaana. om doenaloza santa ana.oro City Council 21 – 29 4/2/2024
City of Santa Ana
10 Code Enforcement Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701 ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION
AC a

OBS SWP ASGND
An inspection of the following premises revealed violations of the Santa Ana Municipal Code:

Address/Location: Santa Ana, CA, Zip
Business Name:

Responsible
Person ( s):

Address: /
City/ State/ Zip: 4AJ D/)r d
Customer #
CDL/ ID#:

ZONE CDBG# r
APN#

WARNING NOTICE
As of at am / pm, you are in violation of Santa Ana Municipa_1 Code Section( s):

SAMC Code Section Description of Violation( s) Corrections Required T IAJ a
k3
Vehicle Yr: Make: Model: is#NIN:

CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: ( ) Refer to " Violation Sheet" ( ) Reflp6 attached " Continuation of Violations" IMPORTANT! Corrections must be completed within how' s / days. Comply by (date) The inspector may conduct a drive -by compliance inspection. will be notified in writing with the Notice of Administrative Fine if you are not in compliance ( see section below). You en be liable for a fine in the amount of $100, $ 200, $ 500 and/ or 1000, $ 2500, $ 5000. ( These fines are subject to ge pursuant to California Government Code Section 36900. 1 In addition to the fine, you may be cited each that the violation exists beyond the correction date. Other enforcement action and penalties may also result if compliance iwilbot achieved by the correction date.

Received by: Phone#:

INSPECTOR: r
CP# PHONE #: ( 714) Monday through Friday
Date Warning Mailed: CP# Date Complied: CP#

NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE FINE
As of {' d at Ai %pm, you are in violation of Santa Ana Municipal Code Section( s):

SAMC Code Section Description of Violation( s)
c
E-7QU01A Pr< TrL/ ! r-! 6 - T ,
See Attached Addendum Report
I sT CITATION $ -'" IS NOW DUE AND PAYABLE.
2" CITATION $ IS NOW DUE AND PAYABLE.
3RD CITATION $ IS NOW DUE AND PAYABLE.
4" CITATION $ IS NOW DUE AND PAYABLE
Pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 1- 21. 8, you have 15 days from the date of this administrative fine to file an appeal.

See the reverse side of this Notice for payment and appeal information relating to a Request for Administrative Hearing.) Received by: Print Name:

Refu§ed. to sign. Served via personal service. r / ( V CP# 1 Served Certifi d d First Class mail Date: ! L # t
I CP# 1
Signature ( O ) cer ^ Print Name
Phone # 714 l Monday through Friday
Case# l FZ: 3
1 City Council 076 1V ED# is 21 – 30 4/2/2024
0-U UNITED STATES

POSTAL SERVICE
July 27, 2023
Dear Thu Tran:

The following is in response to your request for proof of delivery on your item with the tracking number:
9589 0710 5270 0616 7912 90.

Status:

Status Date / Time:

Location:

Postal Product:

Extra Services:

Weight:

Delivered, PO Box
July 25, 2023, 8: 27 am
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
First -Class Mail°
Certified MaiITM
Return Receipt Electronic

1. 0oz
Signature of Recipient:
r
Address of Recipient. ql d
I
Note: Scanned image may reflect a different destination address due to Intended Recipient' s delivery instructions on file.

Thank you for selecting the United States Postal Service° for your mailing needs. If you require additional assistance, please contact your local Post Office TM or a Postal representative at 1- 800- 222- 1811.

Sincerely,
United States Postal Service°
Washington, D. C. 20260- 0004
City Council 21 – 31 4/2/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Finance & Management Services Agency M- 87
20 Civic Center Plaza
P. O. Box 1964
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Ph: ( 714) 647- 6543
Email: accountsreceivables@santa- ana. orq

INVOICE
Customer: --

THU V L TRAN
SAN DIEGO CA 92126- 8000
Date: 07/ 26/ 2023
Customer No. 31897
Invoice No. AC18978
Due Date: 08/ 25/ 2023
Description: I Balance Forward:

CODE ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION INVOICE If you have any questions concerning this invoice, please contact ( 714) 667- 2780.
100. 00
AC233333A 7,16/ 23
Total Due: $ 100. 00
Please remit payment within 30 days to the address referenced below. Past due accounts are referred to a collection agency.

CHECK POLICY: It is understood by all persons who wish to write checks to the City that acceptance of checks is conditional upon the satisfactory collection of the check. If a check is dishonored or returned for any reason. the customer will be responsible for paying the full amount of the check that was returned plus the state' s maximum allowable processing fee.

PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE
MAIL PAYMENT TO: -,
CITY OF SANTA ANA M- 13
Customer: 31897
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA

THU V L TRAIN
PO BOX 1964
SANTA ANA CA 92702
Invoice #: AC18978
Due Date: 08/ 25/ 2023
Amount Due: 100. 00
AC00018978000031897000000100009AC000189780000318970000001000098 City Council 21 – 32 4/2/2024

EXHIBIT B
City Council 21 – 33 4/2/2024

REQUEST FOR
p COUNCIL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:

SEPTEMBER 16, 2016
TITLE;

EMERGENCY ORDINANCE ADOPTING
A 46 DAY MORATORIUM ON THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF ANY SHORTTERM RESIDENTIAL RENTAL, USE STIR TEGIC P N NO. 5, 4)

CITY MANAGER

RECOMMENDED ACTION
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
s w : 22% ..
lJ As Recommended
As Amended
Ordinance on 1" Reading
Ordinance on Od Reading
Implementing Resolution
171 Set Public Hearing For

CONTINUED TO

FILE NUMBER
Approve an emergency ordinance adopting a 45-day temporary moratorium on the establishment or expansion of any short terns residential rental use, In recent years, there has been an increased popularity of "home -sharing" ,and other short -terra vacation rentals through the use of web -based companies such as Alrbnb, placation Rentals by Owner ( VRBO), and Homeaway. These sites allow property owners to rent their homes or apartments as an alternative travel accommodation while providing homeowners or renters with additional income. Homes or rooms are typically listed by location and pay a percentage of their income to the host company.

Current provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code ( SAMC) do not clearly define or identify short-term rentals as a permitted use in a residential zone, Further, staff has received numerous complaints from residents and neighborhood representatives related to impacts from snort -term. rental uses such as noise, on -street parking supply, increased traffic and other impacts affecting the duality of life in the community, Short-term rentals have resulted in increased Code Enforcement complaints and frustration for both the nearby residents and property owners who wish to offer them types of short- term rentals,
As such, staff needs time to analyze the Santa Ana Municipal Code to review, steady and revise the existing Code in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of short-term residential rentals In the City, The proposed interim ordinance will prohibit the establishment of any short-term residential rental for a 45-daytime period, During the 4 - day interim ordinance period, a zoning study will be performed which will assist in the preparation of a permanent ordinance for this use, An update can further study of this issue and a pudic hearing to consider a permanent ordinance will be scheduled for the October 20, 2015 City 0ouneil meeting.
5OB- 1
City Council 21 – 34 4/2/2024
Short -Term Residential Rental Moratorium
September 15, 2015

Page 2 ends

STRA,TE011 C PLAID ALIGNMENT
Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Caul No. 5, Community.Health, Livabliity, Engagement , and Sustainability, Objective No 4 (support neighborhood vitality and livability).

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action,
Hassan Hajh nl, AlUP Executive
Director Planning
and Building Agency VC;
rb vGk
p rGsl hpit7 rmR ld®ntiaf Fdsnt ia,46M'rtorlu n 5O
B-2
City Council 21 – 35 4/2/2024
LS 9. 8. 16
ORDINANCE NO. NS- XXX

AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA
ANA ADOPTING A 45- DAY TEMPORARY MORATORIUM

ON SHORT- TERM RESIDENTIAL RENTAL USES
THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:

A. The growing popularity of " home -sharing" and other short- term vacation rentals, through the use of internst- based companies such as Airbnb, Vacation Rentals by Owner (° VRBO°) and Homeaway, allow individual homeowners, landlords, and tenants to list homes, apartments, and rooms for rent.

B. The current provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (" SAMC") do not clearly identify short-term residential rental uses or take into account the potential impacts associated with the establishment of short- term rentals within existing residential zones. As such, provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (" the Code") require review, study, and possible revision in order to respond to recent concerns relating to the impacts of these short- term rental uses in the City.

C. Given these concerns, the City Council hereby requests that a study be undertaken of the current provisions of Chapter 41 of the Municipal Code to address short-term residential rentals and determine whether such uses should be permitted in the City, and if so, where such uses should be permitted and under what conditions.

D. Based on the foregoing, the City Council finds that issuing permits, business licenses, or other applicable entitlements to individuals wishing to use their property for the purposes of a short-term residential rental, prior to the City' s completion of its study of the potential impact of such short-term residential rentals, would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and that a temporary moratorium on the issuance of such permits, licenses, and entitlements is thus necessary.

E. If a short-term residential rental use is permitted in the City without further review and potential regulation, it will pose a serious threat to the public interest, health, safety and welfare for the following reasons:

1. Residents living near unregulated short -terra residential rentals are impacted by such uses' excessive noise, which affects the quality of life for surrounding residents, on -street parking impacts, nuisance conditions and traffic in and around these uses.

Ordinance No. NS -

Page 1 of 4 ends

5o B- 3
City Council 21 – 36 4/2/2024
F. Prevention of detrimental impacts to residents, the public interest, health, safety and welfare requires the immediate enactment of this ordinance.. The absence of this ordinance will create a serious threat to the orderly and effective implementation of any code amendments, general plan amendments or specific plan amendments which may be adopted by the City; short- term residential rental uses may be in conflict with or frustrate the contemplated updates and revisions to the Code.

Moreover, permitting such uses during said studies and implementation would create impacts on the public health, safety and welfare that the city council, in adopting this ordinance, has found to be unacceptable.

G. The Request for Council Action for this ordinance dated September 15, 2015 and duly signed by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency shall, by this reference, be incorporated herein, and together with this ordinance, any amendments or supplements, and oral testimony constitute the necessary findings for this ordinance.

H. The city council finds, determines and declares that the current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare of the city and its citizens necessitates the immediate enactment of the ordinance. The facts constituting such urgency are set forth in paragraphs A-H of this ordinance.

Section_..2. No short-term residential rental is permitted in a residential zone as defined in Article I of Chapter 41 of the Code.

Section 3. Any ordinance declared by the City Council to be necessary as an emergency measure for preserving the public peace, health and safety, and containing a statement of the reasons for its urgency, may be introduced and adopted at one and the same meeting if passed by the affirmative votes of at least two- thirds ( 2/ 3) vote of the City Council members pursuant to Section 415 of the City Charter and shall be immediately effective pursuant to Section 417 of the City Charter, Further, California Government Code Section 65858 authorizes the City Council to adopt an interim urgency ordinance, without following the procedures otherwise required for the adoption of an ordinance, to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, Planning Commission or the planning division is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time.

Section 4, This ordinance shall have no further force and effect forty-five ( 45) days from the date of its adoption; unless, however, after public hearing the City Council members, by two- thirds ( 2/ 3) vote, extend this ordinance for an initial period of ten ( 10) months and fifteen ( 15) days and thereafter, after public hearing, the City Council members, by two-thirds (2/ 3) vote, extend this ordinance one more year.

Ordinance No. NS -

Page 2 of 4 ends

5o B-4
City Council 21 – 37 4/2/2024
Section 5. It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person to violate or fail to comply with any provision of the ordinance. The violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be punished as provided in Section 1- 8 of the Code.

Section 6. If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, phrase or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, phrases, or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 7. The Clerk of the Council shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.

Section 8. This ordinance is introduced, passed and adopted at one and the same meeting and is thereafter immediately effective. The city council finds that this ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health and welfare. The reasons for the emergency are set forth in Section 1, paragraphs A-H, inclusive of this ordinance.

ADOPTED this 15'" day of September 2015.

APPROVED AS TO. FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
C. ' , . . . , - -, -
By: Lisa Storck, Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers:

Miguel A. Pulido
Mayor
Ordinance No. INS -

Page 3 of 4 ends

5OB- 5
City Council 21 – 38 4/2/2024

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Maria D. Huizar, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- XXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on September 15, 2015,
Date:

Ordinance No. NS -

Page 4 of 4 ends

Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
5OB- 6
City Council 21 – 39 4/2/2024

EXHIBIT C
City Council 21 – 40 4/2/2024

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
OCTOBER 20, 2015

CLOSED SESSION MEETING

CALLED TO ORDER COUNCIL CHAMBER
22 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
5: 27 P. M.

ATTENDANCE COUNCILMEMBERS Present:

MIGUEL A. PULIDO, Mayor
VINCENT F. SARMIENTO, Mayor Pro Tern
P. DAVID BENAVIDES ( 5: 45 p. m.)

MICHELE MARTINEZ
ROMAN A. REYNA ( 5: 31 p. m.)

SAL TINAJERO
COUNCILMEMBERS Absent:

ANGELICA AMEZCUA
STAFF Present:

DAVID CAVAZOS, City Manager
SONIA R. CARVALHO, City Attorney
MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council
PUBLIC COMMENTS — None
COUNCIL RECESSED to Room 147 for Closed Session discussion at 5: 27 p. m.

CLOSED SESSION ITEMS - The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL —EXISTING LITIGATION
pursuant to Paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( d) of Section 54956. 9 of the Government Code:

Brian Booker v. City of Santa Ana, Case No. SACV15- 00431- DOC DFMx)
CITY COUNCIL. MINUTES 1 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 41 4/2/2024

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. 6( a):

Agency Negotiators: Personnel Services Executive Director, Ed Raya
Employee Organizations: Service Employees' International Union ( SEIU) Full -Time Employees
Service Employees' International Union ( SEIU)
Park -Time Employees
Agency Negotiator: City Manager, David Cavazos
Employee Organizations: Executive Management ( EM)

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL e ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph ( 2) or ( 3) of subdivision ( d) of Section 54956. 9 of the Government Code: - One Case

4. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Section 54957( b)( 1) of the Government Code:

Title: Clerk of the Council
CLOSED SESSION REPORT - See Item 19A for any reportable actions.

ADJOURNED THE CLOSED SESSION MEETING AT 6: 02 P. M. AND CONVENED TO THE REGULAR OPEN MEETING.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 42 4/2/2024

CALLED TO ORDER

ATTENDANCE

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INVOCATION

PRESENTATION

REGULAR OPEN MEETING

COUNCIL CHAMBER
22 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA

SANTA ANA, CA
6: 03 P. M.

COUNCILMEMBERS Present:

MIGUEL A. PULIDO, Mayor
VINCENT F. SARMIENTO, Mayor Pro Tern
ANGELICA AMEZCUA ( 6: 44 p. m.)
P. DAVID BENAVIDES

MICHELE MARTINEZ
ROMAN A. REYNA

SAL TINAJERO
COUNCILMEMBERS Absent:

NONE
STAFF Present:

DAVID CAVAZOS, City Manager
SONIA R. CARVALHO, City Attorney
MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council
LESLIE TELLEZ, MacARTHUR

FUNDAMENTAL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

JACK ABEELEN, POLICE CHAPLAIN
PROCLAMATION presented by MAYOR PRO TEM SARMIENTO to Bolivian Consul General Marco Antonio Valverde Carrasco in recognition of Latin American Day.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT — No reportable action.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Alfredo Rubalcava Chief External Officer for Magnolia Science Academy, spoke on Agenda Item 19F, expressed appreciation for moving forward with Promise Zone designation.

Laura Schlottman, Principal at Magnolia Science Academy, echoed comments by Mr. Rubalcava, would like to partner with City on Promise Zone efforts; also, indicated that they would be opening up a new school in Santa Ana in the coming school year.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 43 4/2/2024

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS
MOTION: Approve staff recommendations on Consent Calendar Items 10A through 31A, with the following modifications:

Councilmember Martinez pulled Agenda Items 19E, 25G and 25H for separate discussion; and
Councilmember Reyna pulled Agenda Items 19F and 20B for separate discussion.

MOTION: Sarmiento SECOND: Tinajero
VOTE: AYES: Benavides, Pulido, Martinez, Reyna,
Sarmiento, Tinajero ( 6)
NOES: None ( 0)
ABSTAIN: None ( 0)
ABSENT: Amezcua ( 1)
Items removed for separate action, or modified are highlighted. Separate actions show the actual vote Itemswithout votes are adopted as part of the consent remotion.

ADMINISTRATIVE

MATTERS MINUTES
10A.

MINUTES FROM THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 6, 2015 STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 11 - Clerk ofthe Council Office MOTION:

Approve Minutes. BOARDS
1 COMMISSIONS / COMMITTEES 13A.

COUNCIL COMMITTEES — AGENDA AND MINUTES { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 1) - Clerk of the Council Office MOTION:

Receive and file. NAME
MEETING DATE Special
Meeting of Code of Conduct & Ethics 10/ 01/ 2015 Special Meeting of Development & Transportation 10/ 14/ 2015 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 44 4/2/2024
13B. NOMINATED BY COUNCILMEMBER TINAJERO AS THE WARD 6

REPRESENTATIVE TO THE PERSONNEL BOARD FOR PARTIAL
TERM EXPIRING DECEMBER 11, 2018 { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 1) - Clerk of the Council Office
MOTION: Appoint Maricela Vallejo, Ward 6 resident, to the Personnel Board for a partial term expiring December 11, 2018 ( replacing S.

Tuchler).

MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATION
19A. CONFIRMATION OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION( S) — None
19B. EXCUSED ABSENCES — None
19C. STRATEGIC PLAN MONTHLY REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2015
STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 1} - City Manager' s Office
MOTION: Receive and file.
19D. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE
STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 11) - City Manager's Office
MOTION: Receive and file.
19E. POLICE OFFICER REI RUITING. AND `HIRING UPDATE ( STRATEGIC PLAN NO 1, 11) - Police Department
City Council thanked staff and Police Chief Rojas for recruitment efforts and moving forward with community policing body cameras, transparency, and accountability.

City Manager Cavazos indicated that the City has added 37 new positions plus 10 with COPS grants in the past year.

MOTION; Receive and file.

MOTION: Martinez
VOTE: AYES
SECOND: Reyna
Benavides, Pulido, Martinez, Reyna,
Sarmiento, Tinajero ( 6)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5 OCTOEER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 45 4/2/2024
NOES: None ( 0)
ABSTAIN: None ( 0)
ABSENT: Amezcua ( 1)
Councilmember Benavides, reported a conflict of interest due to proximity of residence to area and abstained on matter.
19F. STRATEGY TO SECURE.. FEDERAL PROMISE ZONE DESIGNATION FOR SANTAANA { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. ,5, 4D) - Community Development Agency Councilmember
Reyna, asked to be engaged inprogram since it was in his Ward. Designation
advantages would include: 1) the awarding of preferences for certain competitive federal grant programs; and 2) proposed hiring tax credits and enhanced depreciation (tax) benefits toinvestors ( subject to Congressional approval). Broad objectives associated with Santa Ana'sstrategy include the creation of jobs, growing the local economy, improving education opportunities, and reducing crime. LOTION.

Receive and file. MOTION:

Reyna SECOND: Martinez VOTE:

AYES: Pulido, Martinez, Reyna, Sarmiento, Tinajero 5)
NOES:

None ( 0) ABSTAIN:

Benavides ( 1) ABSENT:

Amezcua ( 1) BUDGETARY

MATTERS APPROPRIATION
ADJUSTMENTS 20A.

APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT AND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE OF CITY - OWNED REAL PROPERTY AT1232
AND 1244 SOUTH BRISTOL STREET, APN 109- 421-21 AND 22 STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 1 G; 3, 2C} - Community Development Agency CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6 OCTOBER 20, 20' 15
City Council 21 – 46 4/2/2024
MOTION:

1. AGMT NO. 2015- 225 - Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute a purchase and sale agreement with Spyglass Investment Group, in an amount of $ 2, 000, 000, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

2. Approve an appropriation adjustment. ( Requires five affirmative votes)
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016- 048 - Recognizing
2, 000, 000 in Community Development Block Grant program income for fiscal year 2015- 16 from sale of City -owned property located at 1232 and 1244 South Bristol Street and appropriate same to expenditure account
0`B A.PPROPRIATlC71V AD ] USTNIENT AND AGREEMENT BICYCLE SAFETY ED_UCATION' AND OUTREACH PROGRAM GRANT FUNDING
PROJECT" 16.6866) { STRATEGIC PLAN NO 1, : 3B) - Public Works Agency
Councilmember Reyna asked that Santa Ana Unified School District be engaged in the education and outreach efforts.

MOTION:

1. Approve an appropriation adjustment. ( Requires five affirmative votes)
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016- 040 - Recognize Office of Traffic Safety Public Education on Bicycle Safety grant funds in an amount of $ 100, 000 in the OTS- PWA Traffic Safety Grants revenue account, and appropriate the same to the OTS- Bicycle Safety PWA expenditure account.

2. AGMT NO. 2015- 226 - Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with the State of California Office of Traffic Safety, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, in an amount not to exceed $ 100, 000, for a one-year period from October 1, 2015, through September 30, 2016.

MOTION: Reyna SECOND: Benavides
VOTE: AYES: Benavides, Pulido, Martinez, Reyna,
Sarmiento, Tinajero ( 6)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 7 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 47 4/2/2024
NOES: None ( 0)
ABSTAIN: None ( 0)
ABSENT: Amezcua ( 1)

AGREEMENTS
25A. SPECIAL LEGAL COUNSEL SERVICES ( STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 7, 3B) City Attorney' s Office
MOTION.

1. AGMT NO. 2015- 227 - Authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Alvarez-Giasman & Colvin, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, for legal services at the specified rates in contract;

2. AGMT NO. 2015-223 - Authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Haight Brown & Bonesteel, LLP, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, for legal services at the specified rates in contract, for a three year period beginning October 20, 2015;

3. AGMT NO. 2015-229 - Authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of Council to execute an agreement with Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, APLC, subject to non -substantive changes
approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, for legal services at the specified rates in contract, for a three year period beginning October 20, 2015; and

4. AGMT NO. 2015- 230 - Authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of Council to execute an agreement with Ferguson, Praet &
Sherman, APLC, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney, for legal services at the specified rates in contract, for a three year period beginning October 20, 2015.
25B. AGMT NO. 2015- 231 - SALES TAX REBATE WITH VOLVO OF ORANGE COUNTY { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3, 3C} - Community Development Agency
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 48 4/2/2024
MOTION: Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute a safes tax rebate agreement with SSF, INC., doing business as Volvo of Orange County for a 50 percent rebate of the increase in new sales tax generated by the deafer above a base year up to total maximum amount of $ 1, 000, 000 over a 10- year period, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney..
25C. ACCEPTING 2015 RECOVERY

JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT
Police Department
MOTION:

ACT EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL
FUNDS { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 1, 313}

1. Accept the 2015 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant funding in the amount of $88, 392 into the Byrne Justice Assistance revenue account and appropriate same to expenditure account in the respective fiscal years.

2. AGMT NO. 2015-232- Authorize the City Manager, Chief of Police, and the Clerk of the Council to execute a three- year agreement with the County of Orange, Sheriff's Department ( DJ- BX-0226) to transfer the 2015 Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program funds in the amount of $88, 392. 25D. AGMT NO. 2015- 233 eAPPROVE AN EXTENSION TO THE

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR FUNDING ENVIRONMENTAL AND

TOXICS PROGRAMS FOR THE NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED
STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 21 - Public Works Agency
MOTION: Authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. Dll- 066 to extend multijurisdictional Cooperative Agreement Dll- 066 for three years, through June 30, 2018, to fund the Environmental and Toxics Total Maximum Daily Load programs in the Newport Bay Watershed, and commit to the same annual fair share percentage of 10. 77 percent with an annual amount not -to -exceed of $ 150, 000.
25E. AGMT NO. 2015- 234 - PRESSURE WASHING SERVICES IN THE CIVIC CENTER AREA { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 1 B} - Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency
MOTION: Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment with Superior Property Services, increasing the contingency by $ 8, 250 for a total annual amount of $ 105, 100, for CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 9 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 49 4/2/2024
the third year period of the five-year agreement, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.
25F. ENGINEERING, TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
SERVICES { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, ' IC) - Public Works Agency MOTION: Authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute agreements with following, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, for a three- year period expiring October 20, 2018, with provisions for one 2- year renewal option exercisable by the City Manager and City Attorney, in an amount not to exceed $500, 000 for each firm over the entire term of the agreement, including any renewal:

AGMT NO. 2015- 235- With Project Partners, Inc.,
AGMT NO. 2015-236 — With PENCO Engineering, Inc., and
AGMT NO. 2015- 237 — With CivilSource, Inc.
25G. AGMT NO. 2015- 238 CITYWIDE SPEEDLIMITSTUDY ( PROJECT 16- 6861) ( NOWGENERAL FUND) (STRATEGIC PLAN NO:. 6, 1. B) - Public Works Agency Councilmember
Martinez, requested update on crash that occurred atthe corner of Myrtle Street and Flower Street on October 19, 2015. MOTION:

Authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council toexecute an agreement with Albert Grover & Associates, subject tonon - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, to conduct engineering and traffic survey studies inorder to update posted speed limits, as well as follow up speed surveys, in a total amount not to exceed $ 75, 812, which includes a 10% contingency, for a three- year period from October 21, 2015 through October 20, 2018. MOTION:

Martinez VOTE:

AYES: NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

CITY
COUNCIL. MINUTES SECOND:

Sarmiento Benavides,
Pulido, Martinez, Reyna, Sarmiento,
Tinajero (6) None (
0) None (
0) Amezcua (
1) 10
OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 50 4/2/2024
25H, AGMT ` NO. 2015- 239- .. GRAFFITI STREET CLEANING SERVICES NON -GENERAL FUND) { STRATEGIC PLAN NOS. 6, 1 B and 7, 5E) - P"ub lic. 0orks Agency and Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency.

Councilmember Martinez, requested report on full cost analysis of police and graffiti enforcement, including return on investment.

MOTION: Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Graffiti Protective Coatings, Inc., subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, to perform graffiti street cleaning services in areas that are visible from the right-of-way in the amount of $1, 820, 000 and in City park areas not visible from the right-of-way in the amount of 324,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $ 2, 144, 000 in the two-year period; contract expires October 31, 2017 and allows for three 1- year renewal options, exercisable by the City Manager and City Attorney.

MOTION: Martinez
VOTE: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

SECOND: Tinajero
Benavides, Pulido, Martinez, Reyna,
Sarmiento, Tinajero ( 6)
None ( 0)
None ( 0)
Amezcua ( 1)
251. MANAGED PRINT SERVICES AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS FOR
COPIERS ( STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 7, 5) - Finance & Management Services
MOTION:

1. AGMT NO. 2015- 240 - Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with C3 Office Solutions, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, for Managed Print Services along with contract contingency of ten percent for one year ( November 1, 2015 through October 31, 2016), for an amount not to exceed 177, 670.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 11 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 51 4/2/2024

2. AGMT NO. 2015- 241 - Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to amend the existing agreement with C3 Office Solutions for the period November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2015, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, for Managed Print Services related to invoices to close-out existing account balance for an amount not to exceed $ 39, 000.

3. AGMT NO. 2015- 242 - Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute a lease agreement with C3 Office Solutions which is anticipated to be assigned to GE Capital, LLC for the purpose of consolidating all leases with GE Capital, LLC, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, for the consolidation of approved and existing Capital Leases, along with two additional Capital Leases of City Multi -Function Printers for a three- year term beginning November 1, 2015 through October 31, 2018, for an amount not to exceed 470, 330.

LAND USE MATTERS
CONDITIONAL. USE PERMITIVARIANCES
31 A. VARIANCE NO. 2015- 06

PLANET FITNESS AT

VILLAFANA, APPLICANT
Building Agency

TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN PARKING FOR
1760 EAST EDINGER AVENUE - CHASE
STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3, 21 - Planning and
Planning Commission approved recommended action on September 28, 2015, by a vote of 6- 0 ( Alderete absent).

MOTION: Receive and file the staff report approving Variance No. 2015- 06 as conditioned.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR**
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 52 4/2/2024

BUSINESS CALENDAR ITEMS

RESOLUTIONS
55A. RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION
STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 4A) - Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency
MOTION: Adopt a resolution.

RESOLUTION NO. 2015- 058 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR

GRANT FUNDS FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECREATIONAL

TRAILS PROGRAM FOR A BIKE TRAIL PROJECT ALONG THE

GREENVILLEIBANNING FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND

CENTENNIAL PARK
MOTION: Martinez SECOND: Tinajero
VOTE: AYES: Benavides, Martinez, Pulido, Reyna, Tinajero, Sarmiento ( 6)
NOES: None ( 0)
ABSTAIN: None ( 0)
ABSENT: Amezcua ( 1)
55B. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO FISCAL YEAR 2015- 16 BUDGET TO

ADD ONE POLICE SERGEANT AND FOUR POLICE OFFICERS
POSITIONS { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 1, 1 and 5, 13 - Personnel Services Agency and Police Department
MOTION:

1. Adopt a resolution.

RESOLUTION NO. 2015- 059 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND THE

CURRENT ANNUAL BUDGET TO ADD FIVE FULL TIME

POSITIONS IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT

2. Approve an appropriation adjustment. ( Requires five affirmative votes)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 13 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 53 4/2/2024
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016- 050 - Approve an
appropriation adjustment in an amount of $ 725, 869 from recognized prior year revenue and appropriating $ 725, 869 into the Downtown Enhancements account,
NOTION: Sarmiento SECOND: Tinajero
VOTE: AYES: Benavides, Martinez, Pulido, Reyna, Tinajero, Sarmiento ( 6)
NOES: None ( 0)
ABSTAIN: None ( 0)
ABSENT: Amezcua ( 1)
Councilmember Amezcua arrived at 6: 44 p. m.

REPORTS
65A. REVIEW AND ADOPT THE FISCAL YEAR 2014- 15 SURPLUS

ALLOCATION PLAN, AND APPROVE APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 4, 1; 6, 1, 2) - City Manager' s Office The following spoke on the matter:

Rick Neidermeyer, supports synthetic turf at Dan Young Soccer Field.

Victoria Perez, support funding for internship program in the amount of 150, 000 that could to benefit as many as 3,000 families in our community.

Luis Sarmiento, congratulated staff for having surplus; pleased with proposal for homeless program in addition to joint use agreements; requested consideration for proposal presented by community groups.

America Bracho, representing Latino Health Access, requested funding in the amount of $ 1 million for building maintenance.

Staff presentation by City Manager Cavazos
CITY CHARTER REQUIREMENTS ( Santa Ana City Charter)
Sec. 609 — Budget Appropriations ( Year -End Balance). From the effective date of the budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures shall be and become appropriated to the several offices, agencies, and departments for the respective objectives and purposes therein specified as stated in an appropriation ordinance. All appropriations shall lapse at the end of the fiscal year to the extent that they shall not have been expended or lawfully encumbered.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 14 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 54 4/2/2024
Sec. 609 — Budget Appropriations ( Voting Requirements). At any meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the affirmative votes of at least two- thirds ( 2/ 3) of the members so as to authorize the transfer of unused balances appropriated for one purpose to another purpose, or to appropriate available revenue not included in the budget.

FY 14- 15 PROJECTED YEAR-END SURPLUS TOTAL GENERAL FUND Total Revenues $
208, 918, 360 $ 219, 599, 548 $ 10, 681, 188 t 5. 1%
Total Expenditures $
208, 918, 360 $ 208, 343, 008 $ ( 575, 352) I- -0. 3%
Current estimates for the year- end balance/ surplus is approximately:
11, 256, 540
Total of approximately $ 25M over two years

ALLOCATION SCHEDULE
August 2015:

Discussions with Mayor and Council
Mayor and Council Retreat: August 18, 2015
Discussions with Mayor and Council
September 2015:

Final determination of accrued expenses
Discussions with Mayor and Council
Also, preliminary surplus amount determined $ 11, 250, 000 Work Study Session: September 15, 2015
Discussions with Mayor and Council
October 2015:

Discussions with Mayor and Council
Final Council Approval of Surplus Funds: October 20, 2015 Discussions with Mayor and Council
Total funding
THE PLAN — ONE TIME MONEY F, aws ,,
gin.=,,
Parks
Safety/Security y
v rn!earo
Technology
Investment
Faciiities/ Assets'°°
SURPLUS ALLOCATION— NEXT STEPS

1. Review projects and adopt a Fiscal Year 2014-15 Surplus Allocation List of Projects" for consensus approval by Mayor and City Council:

OR
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 15 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 55 4/2/2024

1. Review options and direct staff to make adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2014- 2015 Surplus Allocation Plan at the discretion of the Mayor and City Council. Approve a combination of surplus eligible projects from the ' List of Projects" and direct staff to appropriate funds in the amounts identified by the Mayor and Council.

2. Approve the establishment of the Council Special Projects Fund ( fund 50) and the appropriation adjustment recognizing up to $ 11, 250, 000 from the Fiscal Year 2014- 15 General Fund Balance and appropriating the same to the Council Special Projects Fund expenditure and reserve accounts as outlined in the Surplus Allocation Plan.

BRISTOL PROPERTY SALE ( CDBG) ECONOMIC INVESTMENT FUNDS

SARTC) NEXT STEPS
Review projects that are CDBG eligible according to the discretion of the Mayor and City Council funded by the sale of Bristol Street Remnant Parcels up to an amount of $2, 000, 000.

Review and approve Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center' s maintenance and improvements' in the amount of $3, 800,000 pending completion of city-wide credit analysis indicating the use of the Economic Investment funds would have no adverse impact on the City' s credit rating.

Council discussion ensued.

Mayor Pulido, asked why Cabrillo Park Clay Tennis Court project was moved to Community Development Block Grant ( CDBG) List B eligibible projects.

Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento, supports approval of items listed on item a) and continue consider of item b) to a later date; requested consideration of funding for Civic Engagement, Building Healthy Communities and Latino Health Access proposal, also, include Sandpointe Park security lighting as an identified project, and recommended that some of the proposed joint - use agreement funding be reallocated to homelessness.

Councilmember Martinez, asked that civic engagement be a priority and institutionalized; State allocated $ 25 million for statewide efforts; City to focus on core services and sustainable government; need to make sure that funds are reallocated to future budgets in the event that projects are not completed in current fiscal year; also, proceeds of Bristol Street property acquisition funds to return to council for consideration.

City Manager Cavazos, indicated that allocation will be for a 3 year period to make sure projects are completed.

Councilmember Amezcua, opined that consensus reached on approve projects on List A.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 16 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 56 4/2/2024
Mayor Pulido, asked if possible for more additional funding available in the near future.

City Manager noted that finances would be appraised and return to City Council with revised figures.

Councilmember Tinajero, thanked staff for progress made to date.

Councilmember Benavides, recommended consideration of skate park in the downtown area.

MOTION:

1. Adopt a Fiscal Year 2014- 15 Surplus Allocation " List of Projects":
a) Direct staff to make adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2014- 2015 Surplus Allocation Plan in the total amount of $11, 250, 000, as follow:

Total
Project/ Community Funding
Dept Benefit Ward Category Requested
Parks and Angel Restroom
Recreation Renovations 5 Parks 50, 000
Riverview Basketball
Parks and Court and Parking Lot
Recreation Renovation 3 Parks 97, 400
Parks and Santiago Bike Trail
Recreation Resurfacing Project 3 Parks 70, 000
Santiago Playground
Parks and Equipment
Recreation Replacement 3 Parks 230, 000
Bomo Koral
Parks and Sidewalk/ Walkway
Recreation Renovations 4 Parks 150, 000
Dan Young Soccer
Parks and Court Field # 2 Syn
Recreation Turf 6 Parks 640, 000
Parks and Cabrillo Park Tennis
Recreation Court Renovations 1 Parks 75, 000
Parks and
Recreation Windsor Tennis Courts 6 Parks 140, 000
Civic Center Joint
Parks and Powers Authority -
Recreation Renovations City -Wide Parks 419, 000
Body Cameras- 200 Safety SAPD Cameras for use by City -Wide Security 350, 000
Police Department
Parks and Security Lights: 6 50, 000
Recreation Windsor Park Parks
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 17 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 57 4/2/2024
Total
Project/ Community Funding
Dept Benefit Ward Category Requested
Parks and Security Lights: Santa 6 50, 000
Recreation Anita Park Parks
Parks and Security Lights: Lillie 1 50, 000
Recreation Kin Park Parks
Parks and Security Lights: 3 50, 000
Recreation Santia o Park Parks
Parks and Security Lights: Bomo 4 170, 000
Recreation Koral Park Parks
Parks and Security Lights: 6 50, 000
Recreation Heritage Park Parks
Parks and Security Lights: 1 50, 000
Recreation Madison Park Parks
Parks and Security Lights: Fisher 3 70, 000
Recreation Park Parks
Safety
CMO Homeless City -Wide Security 400, 000
Public Works GIS System
City -Wide Tech. 125, 000
Agency Development
Network, Data Centers
Technology
and Servers/ Software,
City -Wide Tech. 1, 065, 000
Communications
Upgrade
IT Equipment
Upgrades -
Technology Computers/ laptops, City -Wide Tech. 273, 600 mobile technology,
phones
Financial Budgeting
Technology Application City -Wide Tech. 400, 000
Planning & Building
Technology Permitting Application City -Wide Tech. 300, 000 Communications -
Equipment,
Translation Services,
CMO On -Call
Communication & City -Wide Tech. 190, 000
Public Relations
Services, Marketing
and Advertising
Public Works CIP,
Asset Management,
Technology and Project City -Wide Tech. 300, 000
Management
Application
Santa Ana City -Wide
CDA Branding Study City -Wide Investment 200,000
Planning and
Building General Plan Update City -Wide Investment 1, 000, 000 Planning and Metro East Zone 1 Investment 100, 000
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 18 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 58 4/2/2024
Total
Project/ Community Funding
Dept Benefit Ward Category Requested
Building Expansion
Finance Pension Stability Fund City -Wide Investment 500,000 Placemaking CityCDA Wide City -Wide Investment 100, 000 SARTC Deferred
Public Works Maintenance- HVAC
Agency Replacement 2 investment 650,000
Corbin Center
ImprovementsFacilities/
Finance Restroom Renovation 4
Assets
50, 000
Facility
Improvements
Corporate Yard: Roof
Facilities/
Finance Restoration & Facility City -Wide Assets
650, 000
Renovations
Grand Central: Chiller
Finance
Replacement- Cal
City -Wide
Facilities/
450, 000
State Fullerton 2nd St. Assets
Promenade
Police Department
Facilities/
Finance Jail: Facility City -Wide Assets
150, 000
Renovations
Finance City Hall Facility and City -Wide
Facilities)
155, 000
Safety Renovations Assets
Finance Newhope Library- 3
Facilities/
40, 000
HVAC Project Assets
Jerome Center Gym &
Finance
Southwest Senior
4 Facilities!
50, 000
Center- Facility Assets
Renovations
El Salvador Center -
Finance
Upgrade Exterior
5 Facilities/
15, 000
HVAC Security Assets
Enclosures
Fleet Replacement -
Police, Public Works,
Finance Finance, Planning and City -Wide
Facilities/
1 300, 000
Building, Parks & Assets
Recreation- 44
Vehicles
Calle Cuatro Street
Facilities/
CMO Signs and Plaza Calle 2
Assets
25, 000
Cuatro Si na e
TOTAL 11, 250, 000
b) Continue consideration of items identified as Community Development Block Grant ( CDBG) eligible to a future date.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 19 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 59 4/2/2024
MOTION: Sarmiento
VOTE: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

SECOND: Reyna
Amezcua, Benavides, Martinez, Pulido, Reyna,
Tinajero, Sarmiento ( 7)
None ( 0)
None ( 0)
None ( 0)
c) Approve Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center' s
maintenance and improvements ( Maintenance, Safety/Liability, Tenant space, signage) in the amount of 3, 800, 000 pending completion of city-wide credit analysis indicating the use of the Economic Investment funds would have no adverse impact on the City' s credit rating.

Motion by Tinajero. Item approved by unanimous consent.

On November 3, 2015, Councilmember Martinez requested Agenda item 65A( c) be re -voted since it was not seconded.

2. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016- 051 - Approve the establishment of the Council Special Projects Fund ( fund 50) and the appropriation adjustment recognizing $ 11, 250, 000 from the Fiscal Year 2014- 15 General Fund Balance and appropriating the same to the Council Special Projects Fund expenditure and reserve accounts.

Motion by Martinez, seconded by Reyna. Item approved by unanimous consent.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 20 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 60 4/2/2024

PUBLIC HEARING
75A. EMERGENCY ORDINANCE EXTENDING MORATORIUM ON THE

ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF ANY SHORT-TERM
RESIDENTIAL RENTAL USE FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10 MONTHS AND
15 DAYS { STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 4). - Planning and Building Agency Legal Notice published in the Orange County Reporter on October 9, 2015.

Mayor Pulido opened the Hearing. The following spoke on the matter:

Douglas McLeith, spoke against proposed ordinance; restrictive and not warranted; suggested restrictions for short term rental for full house and for more than 2 people and when owner is not present.

Julie Herrick, has had favorable experience while renting room at her house; opined that proposed ordinance was overreaching and would negatively impact those that are not a problem; suggest 45 day review period, if needed; also, short term rentals allow travelers to experience Santa Ana.

Mayor closed the Hearing.

Council discussion ensued.

Councilmember Martinez, supports shared economy.

Planning and Building Executive Director Haghani, noted that staff reviewing various models; will bring options for consideration; could exempt the properties where property owners are on site or hold off enforcement unless evidence of complaint, if so desired by the City Council; also, intention is to come back to City Council before moratorium expires.

Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento, noted that issue brought forward because of complaint; need to pause and support concept of shared economy; should consider deferring ordinance.

City Manager Cavazos, reported that the home in question that brought forth this issue is now listed for sale, thus not aware of other neighborhood complaints on short term rentals.

Councilmember Martinez, proposed that matter be tabled and bring to the Development and Transportation Committee.

Planning and Building Executive Director Haghani, stated that matter will include in the upcoming zoning code update.

CITY COUNCIL. MINUTES 21 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 61 4/2/2024
City Attorney Carvalho, reported for the record that once the City Council does not extend a moratorium, the City Council will not be able to agendize matter as a moratorium in the future.

MOTION: Table matter indefinitely and agendize on the Development and Transportation Advisory Committee for review.

MOTION: Martinez
VOTE: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

WORK STUDY SESSION
SECOND: Amezcua
Amezcua, Benavides, Martinez, Pulido, Reyna,
Tinajero, Sarmiento ( 7)
None ( 0)
None ( 0)
None ( 0)
WS. OPTIONS FOR ADDRESSING MOBILE VENDING TRUCKS - Planning and Building Agency
Staff report presentation by Interim Code Enforcement Manager, Alvaro Nunez
Propose Modifications to the Ordinance
Rescind Ordinance based on Federal. Court Injunction
Update regulations to reflect current industry practices Eliminate outdated provisions
Distinguish between commercial and residential districts Public Considerations
Colocation of multiple mobile vendors
Compare with similar cities
Meetings with Stakeholders
Planning & Building Agency
Santa Ana Police Department (Traffic Division)
Orange County Health
Latino Health Access
Mobile Vending representative — produce
Mobile Vending representative — catering
South Santa Ana Merchants Association
Downtown Restaurant Association
Neighborhood Association/ Comm Link representative
Public Works Agency
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 22 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 62 4/2/2024
Survey of successful models from other jurisdictions
San Jose, San Francisco, LA County Santa Monica, Long Beach, West Hollywood, Anaheim, Phoenix, Portland, Palm Desert, and San Luis Obispo
What we heard -- Mobile Vending Positives
Provides access to food and other convenience items in dense neighborhoods
Easily accessible to those without transportation
Can act as "eyes on the street" due to their continual presence Already part of the Community.

What we heard -- Public Safety Concerns
Parking too close to intersections and driveways — blocks visibility at crosswalks and sidewalks
Mid -block pedestrian crossings to reach trucks
Can become targets for graffiti and gang identification What we heard -- Neighborhood Quality of Life concerns
Concentration of vending vehicles on neighborhood streets Loud noise
Damage to parkways
Trash and litter accumulation
Tables and chairs blocking sidewalks or set up in the road Public urination
What we heard -- Public Health concerns
Failure to comply with Orange County Health standards
Overnight parking in residential zones
Vehicles not returning to commissaries
Vehicles not adhering to the 2 hour limitation when not providing a bathroom within 200 feet.

Vendors taking up limited parking spaces
Late night operation
Proposed Modifications to Ordinance
Rescind Ordinance based on Federal Court Injunction
Eliminate outdated provisions
Distinguish between commercial and residential districts Public Considerations
Colocation of multiple mobile vendors
Public Health Concerns— recommendations
Commissary
Sanitation/ Bathroom Requirements
Daily Reporting
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 23 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 63 4/2/2024
Public Safety --- recommendations Separation Requirements Distance 500 ft. from any school, park, community center or playground facility.

Distance within 50 feet of a crosswalk.

Maximum six feet in height
No blocking of driveways or movement of other vehicles upon any sidewalks, and public or private streets.

Quality of Life— recommendations Public Right of Way—
Prohibit items in the public right of way
Refuse containers -- maintain 50- foot radius of the vehicle Prohibit the use of amplified sound
Establish hours of operation in residential zones and uses Commercial Zones - Establish Mobile food vending courts ( districts) Allowed on private/ public property -- special event permit.

Enhance/ enliven an area
Increase business activity
generate traffic for existing businesses
Commercial Zones - Considerations
Hours of operation
Traffic/ road closures
Proximity to similar brick -and -mortar businesses
Duration and regularity of events.

Councilmember Martinez, asked that City work with school district in addressing mobile vending trucks on school grounds; recommended land use permit and possibility of establishing districts; suggest that any proposed ordinance not interfere with special events and school fundraisers.

City Attorney Carvalho, said that draft ordinance can include special event provisions, not apply to special agency or neighborhood event if given notice in advance, and may include regulations for schools by balancing the brick and motor establishments.

Councilmember Amezcua, concerned with health, safety, and sanitation of food trucks.

Councilmember Reyna, need to address light pollution; need to regulate according to vehicle code
Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento, noted that City has tried to regulate in the past, with little success -- place, time, management are difficult and have issues with public safety and other secondary impacts, business industry CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 24 OCTOBER 20, 20' 15
City Council 21 – 64 4/2/2024
has matured, need to create economic development opportunities and balance brick and motor establishments.

Motion by Councilmember, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sarmiento to direct staff to rescind current ordinance and return to City Council with options within the next 90 days with new option; motion carried unanimously.

COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS ( Non- Agendized Items)
Michael Klubuski, concerned with County of Orange' s Ethics Committee ordinance.

Venacio Chavez, spoke of various neighborhood issues including increased alcohol consumption, drugs and other illegal activity; request assistance with proposed alcohol license for a business on Minter Street.

Steve Rocco, provided update on recall efforts underway and other personal issues.

Edgar Sebastian Vasquez, representing InterAmerican Agency Sports concerned with proposed closure of Eddie West stadium for a 6 month renovation and closure of fields at Centennial # 2; asked that City Council consider impacts to teams when making such decisions.

Rick Neidermeyer, asked that CDBG funding be available for less projects and programs requesting less than $ 30, 000; also asked City to regulate drones.

Victor Payan, invited all to upcoming Film Festival event this weekend at Frida Theater.

Madeline Spencer, commented on need to hold police officers accountable. 90A. CITY MANAGER' S COMMENTS
Announced that Community Emergency Response Team " CERT" program will be returning.
90B. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Councilmember Martinez:

Expressed concerned that she was not aware that Eddie West Stadium would be closed for 4- 6 months; venue has high usage; Reminded all that each Ward can spend up to $ 10,000 a year for neighborhood events; encouraged all to apply;
Invited all to 2" dannual SOMOS event on November 8t"; asked staff to promote event regionally; and
Asked that City Council be kept abreast of community events and changes at City Hall that effect the community.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 25 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 65 4/2/2024
Councilmember Tinajero:

Announced that Santa Ana High school has undefeated record; upcoming homecoming game v. Segerstrom coming up;
Pleased that City Council able to allocate extra funds; and Thanked efforts by police officers and Police Chief.

Mayor Pro Tern Sarmiento:

Thanked the City Manager for winding down negotiations labor groups; Asked that Communications Manager send out alert on upcoming movie screening on October 24, 2015 at 7: 00 PM at the Frida Theater; Noted that surplus funds should be retitled unallocated funds —deferred maintenance and one- time projects;
Thanked police rank and file for service and living up to high standards; and
Wished all a happy Halloween and asked all to be safe.

Councilmember Amezcua:

Thanked staff for efforts in bringing forth surplus funds; Thanked Police Chief for leadership and continue to hold staff to high standards;
Reported that Orange County Fire Authority has decreased response times; and
Wished son a happy birthday.

Councilmember Reyna:

Asked all to continue to conserve water;
Encouraged all to attend Santa Ana High School v. Segerstrom football game;
Held successful Youth Leadership conference; thanked presenters; Hosted community meeting to inform area of grants available for neighborhood events; and
Urged all to shop Santa Ana.

Councilmember Benavides:

Asked all to be safe on Halloween;
Commented on need for deferred maintenance, need to address maintenance on a regular basis;
City Council committed to " Community Engagement" efforts; access and accessible;
Participated in Love Santa Ana Initiative; graffiti removal app has been effective in eradicating;
Encouraged residents to visit City website and register to receive regular updates through Nixel alerts; need to make option visible on site; and
Support local economy — Shop Santa Ana.

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 26 OCTOBER 20, 2015
City Council 21 – 66 4/2/2024
Mayor Pulido:

Requested memo on status of Eddie West Stadium closure and proposed next steps;
Announced that Bowers Museum in negotiation with Vatican to bring exhibit to Santa Ana; and
Adjourned in memory of Yolanda Hernandez who worked for Dr.

Nogales and to Christopher Joseph Ruiz who served our country in the Marine Corp.

ADJOURNED - 9: 02 p. m. — The next meeting of the City Council is scheduled for Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 5: 00 p. m. for the Closed Session Meeting immediately followed by the Regular Open Business Meeting at 5: 45 p. m. in the Council Chamber, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California.

Adjourn in Memory of
Christopher Joseph Ruiz
and
Yolanda Hernandez
1xv--
Wria Huizar,
Clerk of the Council

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mater Dei High School Parking Structure Project
Community Engagement Plan
General Plan Update
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 27 OCTOBER 20, 20' 15
City Council 21 – 67 4/2/2024

EXHIBIT D
City Council 21 – 68 4/2/2024
Keen v. City of Manhattan Beach, 77 Cal.App. 5th 142 ( 2022) 292 Cal. Rptr. 3d 366, 22 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3511, 2022 Daily Journal D. A. R. 3377 77 Cal. App. 5th 142
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 8, California.

Darby T. KEEN, as Trustee,
etc., Plaintiff and Respondent,
V.

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH
et al., Defendants and Appellants.

B307538
Filed 4/ 6/ 2022
Synopsis
Background: Owner of property rented on short-term
basis petitioned for writ of mandate to enjoin city
from enforcing zoning ordinances prohibiting short-term rentals. The Superior Court, Los Angeles County, No.
19STCP02984, James C. Chalfant, J., enjoined ban on shortterm rentals pending approval of zoning ordinances by Coastal Commission. City appealed.

Holdings: The Court of Appeal, Wiley, J., held that:
1] city' s residential zoning ordinances always permitted short- and long- term rentals, and thus ban on short- term rentals was amendment to local coastal program requiring approval by Coastal Commission;
2] short-term residential rentals did not fall within definition of "hotels, motels, and time- share facilities"; and
3] Court ofAppeal would not take judicial notice of decades - old definition of " hotel."
Affirmed.

Procedural Posture( s): On Appeal; Petition for Writ of Mandate; Request for Judicial Notice.

West Headnotes ( 4)
1] Environmental Law .— Construction
Court of Appeal liberally construes the
California Coastal Act of 1976 to achieve the
ends of protecting the coast and maximizing
public access to it. Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§
30001. 5, 30330.
2 Cases that cite this headnote
2] Environmental Law Coastal areas, bays,
and shorelines
Zoning and Planning Hotels, lodging, and
short-term rentals
City residential zoning ordinances in local
coastal program, which defined single- family
residential and multi -family residential uses,
always permitted short-term, as well as longterm, residential rentals, and thus city' s ban on short-term rentals was amendment to program
requiring approval by Coastal Commission;
ordinances defined single-family and multifamily residential uses as containing one dwelling unit on a site or two or more units on
a site, respectively, city permitted both uses in
residential areas, ordinances provided no textual
basis for temporal distinction about duration of
rentals, and use of word " residence" did not
imply some minimum length of occupancy. Cal.

Pub. Res. Code § 30514.
1 Case that cites this headnote
3] Environmental Law @-- Coastal areas, bays,
and shorelines
Zoning and Planning Q--- Hotels, lodging, and
short-term rentals
Short- term residential rentals did not fall under
definition of " hotels, motels, and time- share
facilities" in city's zoning ordinances in local
coastal program, for purposes of determining
whether city' s ban on short- term rentals was
amendment of program requiring approval by
Coastal Commission; ordinances defined such
facilities as establishments offering lodging on
weekly or less than weekly basis, and having
kitchens in no more than 60% of guest units,
short-term rentals city was trying to prohibit
were of single- and multi -family residences
in residential neighborhoods, and houses and
apartments conventionally had kitchens. Cal.

Pub. Res. Code § 30514.

WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 1 City Council 21 – 69 4/2/2024
Keen v. City of Manhattan Beach, 77 Cal.App. 5th 142 ( 2022) 292 Cal. Rptr. 3d 366, 22 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3511, 2022 Daily Journal D. A. R. 3377 3 Cases that cite this headnote
141 Evidence ;-.— Local laws and ordinances
Court of Appeal would not take judicial notice
of almost 60- year-old ordinance that defined
hotel a particular way, and import that definition
into ordinance in local coastal program, in
determining whether city' s ban on short-term
rentals was amendment of program requiring
approval by Coastal Commission; different
definition from decades before could not prevail
over definition enacted by city and certified by
Commission in existing ordinance at issue. Cal.

Pub. Res. Code § 30514.
367 APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of
Los Angeles County, James C. Chalfant, Judge. Affirmed.

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCP02984
Attorneys and Law Firms
Richards, Watson & Gershon, Quinn M. Barrow, Ginetta
L. Giovinco and Marvin E. Bonilla, for Defendants and
Appellants.

Angel Law, Frank P. Angel and Talia E. Nimmer, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Opinion
WILEY, J.
144 This case is about getting a room near the beach. By law, public access to the beach is a California priority. The California Coastal * 145 Commission enforces this priority by reviewing amendments beach towns make in municipal
laws affecting coastal areas. Amendments require approval.

The legal question here is whether there was an amendment.

In 1994, the City of Manhattan Beach enacted zoning
ordinances, which the Coastal Commission then certified. Did these old ordinances permit rentals of a residential property for fewer than 30 days? The popularity ofAirbnb and similar platforms has made the question acute.

The trial court rightly ruled the City' s old ordinances did permit short-term rentals. This means the City's recent laws against platforms like Airbnb indeed are amendments requiring Commission approval, which the City never got. We affirm. Our statutory references are to the Public Resources Code.

I
We begin with legal, factual, and procedural background.

This section recaps the California Coastal Act, describes local battles over short- term rentals, and recounts the case' s posture.

A
1] The California Coastal Act of 1976 defined the Coastal Commission' s mission to protect the coast and to maximize public access to it. (§§ 30001. 5, 30330.) We liberally construe the Act to achieve these ends. ( Greenfield v Mandalay
Shores Community Assn. ( 2018) 21 Cal. App. 5th 896, 898, 230 Cal.Rptr.3d 827 ( Greenfield).)
The Commission works with local governments to ensure
they take adequate account of state interests. (§ 30004, subds. a) & ( b); FMCity of Dana Point a California Coastal Com. 2013) 217 Cal. AppAth 170, 186, 158 Cal. Rptr. 3d 409.) In this endeavor, the Act' s main tool is the local coastal program. (§ 30500 et seq.; City of Chula Vista v Superior Court ( 1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 472, 489, 183 Cal.Rptr. 909.) Each coastal government must develop one. (§ 30500,
subd. ( a).) Local coastal programs have two parts: the land use plan and the local implementing program. The
latter consists of zoning ordinances, zoning maps, and other possible actions. (§§ 30512, subd. ( a), 30513, subd. ( a).) The Commission reviews the local coastal program. (§§ 30200, 30512, 30512.2, 30513.) If it conforms to the Act's policies, the Commission certifies the program. (§§ 30512, subd. ( a), 30513, subd. ( b).)
146 In accord with these provisions, the City submitted its local coastal program to the Commission years ago. The Commission ** 368 certified the City's land use plan in 1981 and its local implementing program in 1994. This local implementing program included zoning ordinances.

WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 2 City Council 21 – 70 4/2/2024
Keen v. City of Manhattan Beach, 77 Cal.App. 5th 142 ( 2022) 292 Cal. Rptr. 3d 366, 22 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3511, 2022 Daily Journal D. A. R. 3377 Once the local program is approved, it can be amended,
but the local government must submit amendments to the
Commission for approval. Absent approval, amendments
have no force. (§ 30514, subd. ( a).)
Throughout this case, the City has not disputed it would need Commission approval to enact a new prohibition on
short-term rentals within the coastal zone. That would be an " amendment." But the City has stoutly maintained there has been no amendment, because its old ordinances always prohibited short- term rentals. Keen disagrees, and that frames the issue in this case: whether the City amended its program when it clamped down on short-term rentals, or whether
the prohibition was not an amendment because it merely
continued the legal status quo.

L
We now recount how the City banned short-term rentals.

For quite some time, people rented residential units in Manhattan Beach on both long- and short- term bases. The City knew about the practice and occasionally got complaints about a rental property, including about one " party house" in 2005.

Things changed leading up to 2015. Online platforms like Airbnb became popular, which increased short- term rentals.

The City had not received a " tremendous" number of
complaints, but it sought an active stance on the issue.

After hearing from the public, the Council passed two
ordinances " reiterating" the City's supposedly existing ban on short-term rentals. The Council claimed its existing ordinances, including those enacted with the local coastal program, already prohibited short-term rentals implicitly.

We call these the 2015 ordinances.

When the City Council enacted the 2015 ordinances, it
resolved to submit the one about the coastal zone for
Commission certification.

City staff met with Commission staff. The Commission staff, however, recommended the City allow at least some shortterm rentals to facilitate * 147 visitor access to the coastal zone. Then, in 2016, the Commission wrote to all coastal cities, saying municipal regulation of short- term rentals would have to be in cooperation with the Commission. The Commission emphasized that " vacation rentals provide an important source of visitor accommodations in the coastal zone" and that blanket bans would rarely be appropriate.

After the Commission made clear its support for some level of short-term renting, the City withdrew its 2015 request for Commission approval. The City tells us its withdrawal was because the 2015 ordinance worked no change in the law and hence never required Commission certification.

The City Council continued to grapple with how to regulate short-term rentals.

In 2019, the Council adopted an ordinance creating an
enforcement mechanism for its short-term rental ban. This required platforms like Airbnb to tell the City who was renting out what. The ordinance also prohibited platforms from collecting fees for booking transactions.

We call this the 2019 ordinance.

The 2019 ordinance had a pronounced effect: by June 2019, short-term rentals dropped, in round numbers, from 250 to 50.

The ban was markedly, although not completely, effective. 369 In July 2019, the City hired Host Compliance, a
company specializing in helping cities enforce short- term rental regulation.

Bewilderingly, the City tells us there is no evidence its ordinances reduced the number of short-term rentals in the City. The record contradicts this.

C
Darby Keen owns property in the City's coastal zone. He rented it on a short-term basis. The City sent Keen a Notice of Violation on July 16, 2019. Keen petitioned for a writ of mandate to enjoin the City from enforcing the 2015 and 2019 ordinances.

The trial court issued a 19- page single- spaced tentative decision: a model of careful analysis. The court noted what the City did not dispute: the City would have to obtain Commission approval if it were to enact a new prohibition on short- term rentals. The City' s position, however, was the prohibition was not new but rather was to be found in its old WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 3 City Council 21 – 71 4/2/2024
Keen v. City of Manhattan Beach, 77 Cal.App. 5th 142 ( 2022) 292 Cal. Rptr. 3d 366, 22 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3511, 2022 Daily Journal D. A. R. 3377 zoning laws that the Commission had approved years before.

The court disagreed, ruling the * 148 City had not identified any zoning provision to support its conclusion that rentals for fewer than 30 days were barred but longer rentals were permitted. The court concluded the City was wrong to say it had always banned short- term rentals. Rather, the court ruled the ban was new, it was an amendment, and it thus required Commission approval, which it did not have. The court therefore enjoined enforcement ofthe ban on short-term rentals pending Commission approval.

The City appealed.

II
The City's argument boils down to this: the trial court was wrong to think the City has always allowed short-term rentals.

The trial court was right, however, and the plain language of the City' s ordinances proves it.

Our review is independent. ( Berkeley Hills Watershed
Coalition v City ofBerkeley ( 2019) 31 Cal. App. 5th 880, 896, 243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 236.)
A
2] The trial court correctly interpreted the City' s ordinances:
they always permitted short-term, as well as long-term, residential rentals. The City' s ban on short- term rentals thus amended the status quo. This amendment required
Commission approval, which the City never got. So the City' s ban was not valid.

The issue reduces to whether the City' s old ordinances permitted short- term rentals. The following analysis
demonstrates they did.

The City always has allowed people to rent apartments and homes in the City on a long-term basis. In other words, it always has been legal to live in Manhattan Beach as a renter. No one disputes this. One would be rather surprised to discover a community anywhere that banned renting
completely.

Because rentals that are long-term have always been
permissible under the City's ordinances, however, the City has been forced to distinguish between long-term residential rentals the City allows and short-term residential rentals the platforms promote and the City dislikes. Unfortunately for the City, its old residential zoning ordinances contain no longterm/ short-term distinction.

Absent some distinction in the law, then, the law must treat long-term rentals the same as short-term rentals. Iflong-term rentals are legal, so too are short-term rentals. The ordinances offer no textual ** 370 basis for a temporal * 149 distinction about the duration of rentals. The City could have enacted a distinction like that, but it never did.

Because its ordinances say nothing about the duration of rentals, the City cannot credibly insist its ordinances permit long-term residential rentals but have always banned shortterm rentals. That interpretation makes no sense.

The crucial text is ordinance A.08, which defines " Use Classifications" for the City's zoning code. One use
is " Single -Family Residential," defined as "[ b] uildings containing one dwelling unit located on a single lot." A second use is " Multi -family Residential," which is defined as "[ t]wo or more dwelling units on a site." This ordinance contains a chart that shows the City permits both uses in residential areas.

In other words, it is legal to build a residential house or an apartment building in the City' s residential zones. Once it is built, you can reside there. Anyone can. This all makes sense.

It would be surprising if it were otherwise.

The reasonable interpretation of permitting a " Single -Family Residential" building in a residential area is that people are allowed to reside in that building, whether they are owners or renters.

Why, under the text of the ordinance, are renters allowed in? Because residential renters are common in cities, as everyone knows, and nothing in the ordinance takes the unusual step of banning all renting in the residential areas of the City.

Use of the word "residence" does not imply some minimum length of occupancy. ( Cf. People a Venice Suites, LLC
2021) 71 Cal.App. 5th 715, 726, 286 Cal.Rptr.3d 598 ( Venice Suites) [" A `residential building' is used for human habitation without regard to length of occupancy ...."]; Greenfield, supra, 21 Cal. App. 5th at p. 899, 230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 [ the city in question historically treated short term rentals as a residential" activity].)
WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 4 City Council 21 – 72 4/2/2024
Keen v. City of Manhattan Beach, 77 Cal.App. 5th 142 ( 2022) 292 Cal. Rptr. 3d 366, 22 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3511, 2022 Daily Journal D. A. R. 3377 It is possible to reside somewhere for a night, a week, or a lifetime. The City points to no legally precedented way to draw a line between the number of days that makes some
place a " residence" and the number that shows it is not.

Cf. Venice Suites, supra, 71 Cal. App. 5th at p. 732, 286 Cal.Rptr.3d 598 [" the dictionary definitions for apartment house do not indicate a required length of occupancy"].) The same analysis applies to " Multi -family Residential," where the common form of a multi -family building is an apartment building. Apartment dwellers commonly rent.
150 The City's zoning thus permits you to rent a house or an apartment in Manhattan Beach, which accords with common experience. The City' s zoning does not regulate how long your stay can be.

The City' s proposed distinction between long- and short-term rentals —the former always allowed, and the latter always forbidden — has no textual or logical basis. The City thus loses this appeal as a matter of textual interpretation.
3] The City incorrectly argues short-term rentals are more similar to, and therefore fall under the definition of, "Hotels, Motels, and Time -Share Facilities." With our emphasis, the ordinances define these facilities as "[ e] stablishments offering lodging on a weekly or less than weekly basis, and having kitchens in no more than 60 percent of guest units." The short- term rentals the City is trying to prohibit are of single- and multi -family residences in residential neighborhoods. Houses and apartments conventionally have kitchens. This argument is untenable.
371 [ 4] The City asks us to take judicial notice of
a 1964 ordinance that defines a hotel a particular way.

The City argues we should import this definition into the ordinance in the local coastal program. This is illogical.

The different definition from decades before cannot prevail over the definition enacted by the City and certified by the Commission in the ordinance at issue. The older document is not relevant. We deny this request.

The zoning ordinances certified by the Commission thus
allow rentals of single- and multi -family residences in residential zones for any duration, including short- term rentals of the Airbnb variety. The City' s new ban on short- term rentals was an amendment requiring Commission approval. 1: 3
The City's other arguments are invalid.
1 The City relies heavily on the principle of permissive zoning. It argues California has adopted this doctrine: zoning ordinances prohibit any use they do not permit. But the City's ordinances do permit short-term rentals in residential zones.

That is the only reasonable interpretation of the ordinances, as we have shown. This interpretation is not an affront to permissive zoning.
2 The City argues we should defer to its reasonable
interpretation of its own ordinances because it is the local agency with responsibility for * 151 implementing them.

Our analysis does not involve or require deference. We give simple words their obvious meaning. Contrary interpretations are unreasonable.
3 The City notes recent California statutes, in 2019,
characterized short-term rentals as commercial uses. The City says this shows that short-term rentals are inappropriate in residential zones. These state statutes, however, deal with different issues than the municipal ordinances here. The 2019 statutes are not germane.
4 The City argues the trial court erred in interpreting the Coastal Act to require it to provide short-term rentals in residential areas. This is incorrect. The key provision is the one requiring Commission approval of amended laws. The Commission
has not required the City to allow short- term rentals. The Commission has not reviewed the City's ban because the City, incorrectly, has been maintaining its ban is nothing new. There was no erroneous interpretation of the Coastal Act.

City Council 21 – 73 4/2/2024
Keen v. City of Manhattan Beach, 77 Cal.App. 5th 142 ( 2022) 292 Cal. Rptr. 3d 366, 22 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3511, 2022 Daily Journal D. A. R. 3377 The City argues Keen' s reliance on FAKracke v City ofSanta Barbara (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 1089, 278 Cal.Rptr.3d 370 is misplaced. Our analysis does not involve FMKracke.

DISPOSITION
We affirm the judgment and award costs to Keen.

We concur:

STRATTON, Acting P. J.

HARUTUNIAN, J.

All Citations
77 Cal. App.5th 142, 292 Cal.Rptr.3d 366, 22 Cal. Daily Op.

Serv. 3511, 2022 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3377
Footnotes
Judge of the San Diego Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

End of Document 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works.

EXHIBIT E
City Council 21 – 75 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 71 Cal. App. 5th 715
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 8, California.

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
V.

VENICE SUITES, LLC et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.

B300960
I
Filed 11/ 15/ 2021
Synopsis
Background: State of California brought action against
apartment house owner and operator, alleging violation ofLos Angeles Municipal Code ( LAMC), public nuisance, unfair business practices, and false advertising. The Superior Court, Los Angeles County, No. BC624350, Teresa A. Beaudet,
J., granted summary adjudication in part for owner and
operator, and government voluntarily dismissed remaining claims. Government appealed.

Holdings: The Court of Appeal Ohta, Judge of the Los
Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice, held that:
1] Court of Appeal could exercise its discretion to consider government' s legal argument on uncontroverted facts, raised for first time on appeal, that short- term rentals were impliedly prohibited under permissive zoning scheme;
Affirmed.

Procedural Posture( s): On Appeal; Motion for Summary
Judgment.

West Headnotes ( 24)
1] Municipal Corporations 0- Proceedings
concerning construction and validity of
ordinances
A city' s interpretation of an ambiguous portion
of its own code is entitled to deference, but
the court independently reviews the meaning or
application of the law.
21 Appeal and Error .— Review using standard
applied below
Appeal and Error i— All or Part of Evidence
Appeal and Error rv— Excluded or stricken
evidence
On appeal from grant of summary judgment,
Court of Appeal employs same standards as
trial court did and reviews record de novo,
considering all evidence set forth in moving and
opposing papers except that to which objections
were made and sustained. FMCal. Civ. Proc.

Code § 437c( c).
2] residential zone not specifying length of occupancy did [ 31 Summary Judgment 4-- Purpose
not implicitly prevent apartment house from being used for Summary judgment is a particularly suitable short-term occupancies of 30 days or less; means to test the sufficiency of the plaintiffs or defendant' s case. FMCal. Civ. Proc. Code §
3] long- term occupancy requirement for apartment house 437c( c). could not be inferred from definition limiting transient occupancy residential structure ( TORS) to occupancies of 30 days or less; and [ 41 Appeal and Error 4— Nature or Subject - Matter of Issues or Questions
4] zoning code expressly authorizing use of apartment
Zoning and Planning 0=- Preservation below
house in zone for human habitation without length of
of grounds of review
occupancy restriction could not be read in conjunction with rent stabilization ordinance ( RSO) or transient occupancy tax Court of Appeal could exercise its discretion
ordinance ( TOT) to require long-term occupancy. to consider government' s legal argument on uncontroverted facts, raised for first time on
appeal, that short-term rentals were impliedly
WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 1 City Council 21 – 76 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App.Sth 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 prohibited under permissive zoning scheme, in
action brought by State of California against
house owner and operator alleging violation of
municipal code and public nuisance; although
discovery on municipality' s interpretation of
code under permissive zoning theory may have
been conducted, that did not convert question
from legal one to factual one.
1 Case that cites this headnote
5] Appeal and Error W-- Summary Judgment
Generally, the rules relating to the scope of
appellate review apply to appellate review of
summary judgments.
6] Appeal and Error W-- Necessity of
presentation in general
Appeal and Error 0- In general; adhering to
theory pursued below
An argument or theory will not be considered if
it is raised for the first time on appeal.
1 Case that cites this headnote
7] Appeal and Error Q--- In general; adhering to
theory pursued below
Appeal and Error W-- Evidence or Other
Material Not Considered Below
Appeal and Error 4- Summary judgment
When reviewing a summary judgment, the
appellate court must consider only those facts
before the trial court, disregarding any new
allegations on appeal; thus, possible theories that
were not fully developed or factually presented
to the trial court cannot create a " triable issue" on
appeal. FaCal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c( c)
1 Case that cites this headnote
8] Appeal and Error @- In general; adhering to
theory pursued below
A party is not permitted to change his position
and adopt a new and different theory on appeal;
to permit him to do so would not only be unfair
to the trial court, but manifestly unjust to the
opposing litigant.
9] Appeal and Error 4-- Necessity of
presentation in general
Reviewing court may exercise its discretion to
reach merits of newly raised issue in certain
circumstances.
1 Case that cites this headnote
10] Appeal and Error #- In general; adhering to
theory pursued below
An appellant may be permitted to change his
or her theory when a question of law alone is
presented on the facts appearing in the record; in
that case, the opposing party is not required to
defend for the first time on appeal against a new
theory that contemplates a controverted factual
situation.
1 Case that cites this headnote
11] Appeal and Error ti Local law; ordinances
The interpretation of municipal code is question
of law that is decided de novo on appeal.
12] Statutes 4- Questions of law or fact
Ascertainment of legislative intent is legal
question, not factual one.
13] Zoning and Planning W-- Apartment house
districts
Zoning and Planning Q--- Hotels, lodging, and
short-term rentals
Residential zone not specifying length of
occupancy did not implicitly prevent apartment
house from being used for short- term
occupancies of 30 days or less, since term
apartment house in common usage did not
indicate only long- term occupancy. Cal. Civ.

Code §§ 13, 1645.
2 Cases that cite this headnote
WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 2 City Council 21 – 77 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App.Sth 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 14] Appeal and Error W-- Statutory or legislative
law
The proper interpretation of a statute is a question
of law reviewed de novo.
15] Municipal Corporations @— Applicability of
statutory construction rules
Courts interpret municipal ordinances in the
same manner and pursuant to the same rules
applicable to the interpretation of statutes.
16] Statutes 0— Purpose and intent
The fundamental task in a case involving
statutory interpretation is to determine the
Legislature' s intent so as to effectuate the law's
purpose.
17] Statutes 0— Plain Language; Plain, Ordinary,
or Common Meaning
A court begins a task of interpreting a statute
by examining the statute' s words, giving them a
plain and commonsense meaning.
18] Statutes Q- Language and intent, will,
purpose, or policy
Statutes Q--- Context
When interpreting a statute, a court looks to
the entire substance of the statute in order
to determine the scope and purpose of the
provision; that is, it construes the words in
question in context, keeping in mind the nature
and obvious purpose of the statute.
19] Statutes 4. Extrinsic Aids to Construction
Statutes 0 Plain, literal, or clear meaning;
ambiguity
If statutory language is susceptible of
more than one reasonable interpretation, a
court looks to extrinsic aids, including
ostensible objects to be achieved, evils to
be remedied, legislative history, public policy,
contemporaneous administrative construction,
and statutory scheme of which statute is part.
20] Statutes 4-- Reason, reasonableness, and
rationality
Statutes #— Wisdom, practicality, and
common sense
Court interprets statute using reason, practicality,
and common sense to language at hand.
21] Statutes #— Reason, reasonableness, and
rationality
Statutes #— Construction in View of Effects,
Consequences, or Results
Court must give words of statute workable
and reasonable interpretation keeping in
mind consequences that will flow from its
interpretation.
22] Zoning and Planning ` v Apartment house
districts
Zoning and Planning o• Hotels, lodging, and
short- term rentals
Long- term occupancy requirement for apartment
house could not be inferred from definition
limiting transient occupancy residential structure
TORS) to occupancies of 30 days or less;
although physical characteristics of both were
almost identical, definition for apartment house
had been in existence for 65 years.
2 Cases that cite this headnote
23] Statutes 4— Absent terms; silence; omissions
Courts are reluctant to accept that legislatures
enact important or fundamental changes by silent
indirection.
24] Zoning and Planning Q— Apartment house
districts
Zoning and Planning 0- Hotels, lodging, and
short-term rentals
WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 3 City Council 21 – 78 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 Zoning code expressly authorizing use of
apartment house in zone for human habitation
without length of occupancy restriction could
not be read in conjunction with rent stabilization
ordinance ( RSO) or transient occupancy
tax ordinance ( TOT) to require long-term
occupancy; RSO' s application only to monthly,
and not weekly or daily, rent did not compel
conclusion that apartment house was limited to
long- term occupancy, definition of tenant did not
have length of occupancy requirement, and TOT
expressly contemplated that apartment houses
could be occupied by transients, who exercised
occupancy for 30 days or less.
2 Cases that cite this headnote
600 APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of
Los Angeles County. Teresa A. Beaudet, Judge. Affirmed.

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC624350)
Attorneys and Law Firms
Michael N. Feuer, City Attorney, Kathleen A. Kenealy, Chief Assistant City Attorney, Scott Marcus, Chief Senior Assistant City Attorney, Blithe S. Bock and Michael M. Walsh, Deputy City Attorneys for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, Benjamin M. Reznik,
Matthew D. Hinks and Lara Leitner, Los Angeles, for
Defendants and Respondents.

Opinion
OHTA, J.
601 * 719 The People of the State of California
brought suit against Venice Suites, LLC and Carl Lambert collectively, Venice Suites) for * 720 violation of the Los Angeles Municipal Code ( LAMC) and for public nuisance, among other causes of action. Venice Suites owns and
operates an " Apartment House" as defined under LAMC
section 12.03. 1 The People allege Venice Suites illegally operates a hotel or transient occupancy residential structure TORS), defined below, in a building only permitted to
operate as an Apartment House for long-term tenants and not overnight guests or transient renters. Further, the Apartment House is located in a R3 Multiple Dwelling residential zone, which disallows short-term occupancy. The trial court granted summary adjudication for Venice Suites on the two causes of action described above, finding the LAMC did not prohibit short- term occupancy of Apartment Houses in an R3 zone.

The People appealed after they voluntarily dismissed the remaining claims. We affirm.

FACTS
The material facts of this case are undisputed. The subject property, a 32- unit building, is located at 417 Ocean Front Walk (417 OFW) in an area zoned for R3 Multiple Dwellings.

The building was developed in 1921 in the City of Venice, which was later consolidated with the City of Los Angeles City). The City issued a certificate of occupancy on June 10, 1966, permitting use of 417 OFW as a " Thirty Two — Unit Apartment House. H Occupancy." In 1966, " H- Occupancy" uses were associated with the following subgroups: subgroup H-2 was for "Apartment House" use, H-3 was for "Hotel" use, and H-4 was for " Apartment/ hotel" use.

Lambert is the owner and corporate manager ofVenice Suites, LLC. Venice Suites, LLC purchased 417 OFW on September
14, 1999, when it housed a mixture of short- term occupants those staying 30 days or less) and long-term occupants (those staying more than 30 days). The 32 units in 417 OFW are subject to the City's Rent Stabilization Ordinance ( RSO) and Venice Suites annually pays the RSO' s registration renewal fee. Additionally, Venice Suites has obtained annual Los Angeles tax registration certificates and has paid business taxes for " Hotel, apartment, etc." for 417 OFW.

After its purchase, Venice Suites began to renovate the property and paid relocation fees in compliance with the RSO to long- term tenants who wished to move. There have been no evictions from 417 OFW by Venice Suites. Since 2012, Venice Suites has rented the units at 417 OFW to members of the public on a short-term basis with no minimum stay requirement.
721 In 2014 and 2015, the City underwent a change of
policy with regard to the regulation of short- term rentals; it did not change the law applicable to short-term rentals at that time, however. On several ** 602 occasions in
mid —to —late 2014, the City moved to develop and adopt an ordinance to regulate short-term rentals and convened working groups to assist in establishing such an ordinance.

In 2018, after the summary judgment proceedings in this WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 4 City Council 21 – 79 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 case were concluded, the City enacted the Home Sharing
Ordinance, which addresses short-term rentals in private homes. There is no contention the Home Sharing Ordinance applies to 417 OFW.

In 2014, Lambert approached the City's planning department about entitlements to specifically permit short-term rentals at 417 OFW. He was instructed to proceed with the
planning department and California Coastal Commission
for such entitlements. As a result, Lambert submitted a Mello Act Determination of Affordable Units Application 2 for 417 OFW, stating he sought " conversion to transient occupancy residential." The planning department accepted the application to change 417 OFW " from an ( E) 32-
Unit Apartment Building to a 32- room transient occupancy residential bldg. in the Venice specific plan area and dual jurisdiction coastal zone." That application was ultimately denied.

On January 26, 2015, the City issued a notice and order to comply, which asserted Venice Suites effected an "[ i] llegal change of occupancy from ` R- 2 Occupancy' residential
occupancies primarily permanent in nature ( apartments) to R- 1 Occupancy' residential occupancies primarily transient in nature ( hotel/motel) ...." The notice ordered Venice Suites to correct all violations by March 4, 2015.

On June 17, 2016, the Los Angeles City Attorney' s Office filed a civil law enforcement action on behalf of the People against Venice Suites, seeking injunctive relief, equitable relief, and civil penalties for the use of 417 OFW as an illegal hotel or illegal TORS. The People alleged four causes of action: 1) violation of the LAMC, 2) public nuisance, 3) unfair competition under FABusiness and Professions Code section 17200, et seq., and 4) false advertising practices under Business and Professions Code section 17500, et seq.
722 As to the first cause of action, the People alleged a violation of LAMC section 11. 00, which provides: " In addition to any other remedy or penalty provided by this [ Los Angeles Municipal] Code, any violation of any provision of this Code is declared to be a public nuisance and may be abated by the City or by the City Attorney on behalf of the people of the State of California as a nuisance by means of a restraining order, injunction or any other order or judgment in law or equity issued by a court of competent jurisdiction." Specifically, the People alleged Venice Suites violated the following LAMC sections by operating 417 OFW as an illegal hotel or TORS: 12. 10( A), which specifies the allowable uses in a R3 zone; 12. 21( A)( 1), which only allows the uses permitted in the applicable zone and after securing the requisite permits; 12. 26(E) and 91. 109. 1, which require a certificate of occupancy to be issued before a building may be occupied; 91. 8105. 1, which requires a building permit be issued; and 91. 8204, which prohibits changes to the use of a 603 building unless it is made to comply with the LAMC.

The People further alleged Venice Suites failed to comply with an order issued pursuant to LAMC section 91. 103. 3. The second cause ofaction for public nuisance in violation ofCivil Code sections 3479 and 3480 was predicated on the same
violations of the LAMC as the first cause of action.

The parties filed cross - motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication, disputing whether Venice Suites
violated the LAMC. The primary dispute involved whether short-term occupancy of an Apartment House located in
an R3 zone is prohibited under the LAMC. The People
interpreted the LAMC to exclude short-term occupancy of Apartment Houses, relying on provisions of the Zoning Code LAMC, § 11. 00, et seq.), the RSO (LAMC, § 151. 00, et seq.), and the Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance ( TOT; LAMC,

21. 7. 1, et seq.).
1] Venice Suites argued the Zoning Code controlled and
did not regulate the length of occupancy in an Apartment House. Short-term rentals were permitted because none of the provisions relating to an Apartment House in the Zoning Code specified a length of occupancy. Neither did the
relevant land use plans regulate length of occupancy for an Apartment House. Venice Suites cited to testimony to that effect from the persons designated by the People to be the most knowledgeable on the subject. Venice Suites also relied 723 on a report issued by the City that concluded shortterm rentals were not prohibited under the RSO. 3 The trial court granted Venice Suites' s motion for summary adjudication as to the first and second causes of action for violation ofthe LAMC and public nuisance, and it denied both motions as to the third and fourth causes of action for unfair business practices and false advertising.

The People subsequently dismissed their third and fourth causes of action without prejudice and appealed the resulting judgment.

WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 5 City Council 21 – 80 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835

DISCUSSION
I. Standard of Review
2] Summary judgment is appropriate where " all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." ( Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. ( c).) A defendant moving for summary judgment or summary
adjudication must show " that one or more elements of the cause of action ... cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense to the cause of action." ( Id. at subd. ( p)( 2).) On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we employ the same standards as the trial court did and review the record de novo, considering all the evidence set forth in the moving and opposing papers except that to which objections were made and sustained. ( Guz a Bechtel National, Inc. ( 2000) 24 CalAth 317, 334, 100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 352, 8 P.3d 1089.)
3] Our Supreme Court has made clear that the purpose ofthe 1992 and 1993 amendments to the summary judgment statute was " ` to liberalize the granting of [ summary judgment] motions.' " ( ** 604 Perry a Bakewell Hawthorne, LLC
2017) 2 Cal. 5th 536, 542, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 764, 389 P. 3d 1 ( Perry); FMAguilar a Atlantic Richfield Co. ( 2001) 25 CalAth 826, 854, 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 841, 24 P.3d 493.) It is no longer called a " disfavored" remedy. Rather, it is " now seen as ` a particularly suitable means to test the sufficiency' of the plaintiffs or defendant' s case." ( Perry, at p. 542, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 764, 389 P. 3d 1.)
court must consider only those facts before the trial court, disregarding any new allegations on appeal. [ Citation.] Thus, possible theories that were not fully developed or factually presented to the trial court cannot create a ` triable issue' on appeal." ( American Continental Ins. Co. v C & Z Timber Co. ( 1987) 195 Cal. App. 3d 1271, 1281, 241 Cal. Rptr. 466.) A party is not permitted to change his position and adopt a new and different theory on appeal. To permit him to do so would not only be unfair to the trial court, but manifestly unjust to the opposing litigant." ( Ernst a Searle ( 1933) 218 Cal. 233, 240- 241, 22 P. 2d 715; G & W Warren' s, Inc. u Dabney (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 565, 571, 218 Cal.Rptr.3d 75 [ where case was tried on theory that defendant was liable as surety under guaranty agreement, plaintiff was precluded from contending on appeal that defendant was liable as
principal under purchase agreement].)
9] [ 10] Nevertheless, a reviewing court may exercise its discretion to reach the merits of a newly raised issue in certain circumstances. ( People v Superior Court ( Zamudio)
2000) 23 CalAth 183, 195, 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 463, 999 P.2d
686; FMFortBragg Unified School Dist. a ColonialAmerican Casualty & Surety Co. ( 2011) 194 Cal.AppAth 891, 914,
124 Cal. Rptr. 3d 144; 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure ( 5th ed. 2020) Appeal § 414.) For example, an appellant may be permitted to change his or her theory when a question of law alone is presented on the facts appearing in the record. In that case, the opposing party is not required to defend for the first time on appeal against a new theory that contemplates a controverted factual situation. ( Renee J. a Superior Court ( 2002) 96 Cal. AppAth 1450, 1459, 118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 118; 9 Witkin, Cal.

Procedure ( 5th ed. 2020) Appeal § 415 [ cases cited].) 724 II. The Issue Is Not Forfeited
4] As a threshold matter, Venice Suites urges this court to Here, the trial court characterized the People' s argument decline to reach the merits ofthe People' s argument on appeal on summary judgment as follows: " In order to reach the because the People' s argument below was that the LAMC conclusion that apartment houses cannot include short- term expressly prohibited short-term rentals ofApartment Houses, rentals, Plaintiff ties together the following defined * 725 not that short- term rentals were impliedly prohibited under a terms from the [ Los Angeles Municipal] Code thusly: i) an permissive zoning scheme. We agree the People did not raise apartment house [ as defined in the Zoning Code] consists the issue of permissive zoning in their briefing below but we of rental units [ as defined in the RSO], ii) rental units in exercise our discretion to consider the issue on its merits. an apartment house may only be occupied by tenants [ as defined in the RSO but not in the Zoning Code], iii) transients 5] [ 6] [ 7] [ 8] " Generally, the rules relating to the scopias defined in the TOT] are different from tenants, and of appellate review apply to appellate review of summary accordingly, iv) transients may not occupy ** 605 rental judgments. [ Citation.] An argument or theory will ... not be units in apartment houses." After the trial court issued its considered ifit is raised for the first time on appeal. [ Citation.] ruling, the People did not seek reconsideration or otherwise Specifically, in reviewing a summary judgment, the appellate advise the court its characterization of their argument was wrong. Our own review of the People' s summary judgment WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 6 City Council 21 – 81 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 motion reveals the trial court accurately set out the People' s argument.
111 By contrast, the People set forth several arguments on appeal. They first argue an R3 zone is residential in nature, and the common usage of the term apartment house provides context to the incomplete definition in the Zoning Code.

They also contend the City operates under a permissive
zoning scheme, where only expressly authorized uses are permitted while all other uses are prohibited. According to the People, the Zoning Code only expressly permits shortterm occupancy in a TORS. An Apartment House contains the same physical characteristics as a TORS and becomes a TORS if it is occupied on a short-term basis. Because a TORS is not permitted for use in an R3 zone, an Apartment House may not be occupied on a short-term basis in an
R3 zone. These arguments were not presented to the trial court. The People argue, however, the issues raised on appeal present pure questions of law which do not implicate any factual disputes. We agree the interpretation of the LAMC is a question of law which we decide de novo.
12] We are not persuaded by Venice Suites' s contention that the People' s permissive zoning argument raises factual issues not addressed below. In particular, Venice Suites contends the record was not developed as to the City Council' s intent when it adopted the TORS definition in 1992. ( Ord. No 167, 689, Eff. 5/ 9/ 92.) The ascertainment of legislative intent is a legal question, not a factual one. ( Roussos v Roussos ( 2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 962, 973, 275 Cal.Rptr.3d 196.) Venice Suites also asserts it was not provided the opportunity to argue whether it retained vested rights to continue the use of 417 OFW for short-term rentals because that argument was not implicated by the briefing below. Not so. In their combined cross -motion for summary judgment and opposition to the People' s summary judgment motion, Venice Suites asserted their "vested rights to offer [short-term rentals] at the Property survived consolidation of Venice with Los Angeles." Venice Suites does not explain whether and how its vested rights argument would be different under a permissive zoning
theory. Additionally, Venice Suites contends it was prevented from exploring the permissive zoning theory in discovery because the City did not take this position below. That discovery on the City's interpretation of the LAMC under a permissive zoning * 726 theory may have been conducted
does not convert the question from a legal one to a factual one. None of Venice Suites' s arguments prevent us from exercising our discretion to consider a legal question that does not involve controverted facts.

III. The LAMC Does Not Regulate the Length of
Occupancy in An Apartment House in a R3 Zone
13] To prevail on its cross -motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, Venice Suites was required to show that one or more elements of the causes of action at issue could not be established. The People alleged Venice Suites converted 417 OFW into a de facto hotel or TORS despite its location in a R3 residential zone that does not authorize shortterm rentals. This allegation forms the basis for the first and second causes of action. The trial court found " 417 OFW is an apartment house, and that renting units at 417 OFW on a short-term basis is not prohibited by the [ LAMC], nor does it change the use of 417 ** 606 OFW such that it is instead a hotel or a TORS [ footnote omitted]."
We agree with the trial court that the LAMC does not regulate the length of occupancy in Apartment Houses in R3 zones.

The material facts in this case are undisputed: 417 OFW is permitted to operate as an Apartment House and it is located within an R3 Multiple Dwelling zone. The parties' dispute lies in whether an Apartment House in an R3 zone may be used for short-term occupancies of 30 days or less. We must look to the Zoning Code to determine what uses are authorized for an Apartment House in an R3 zone because the Zoning Code sets forth a " comprehensive plan" for the use of buildings in the City for residential purposes. As we have set out in footnote 1, the Zoning Code defines an Apartment House as a " residential building" that contains a certain combination of dwelling units, guest rooms or suites ofrooms. A "residential building" is used for human habitation without regard to length of occupancy and describes every type of building at issue, including an apartment hotel, an Apartment House, a TORS, and a hotel. In short, none ofthe relevant definitions specify a length of occupancy. ( LAMC, § 12. 03.) Neither does the list of permitted uses in an R3 zone, which includes Apartment Houses, specify a length of occupancy. ( LAMC, § 12. 10.) The plain language of the Zoning Code tells us an Apartment House is permitted to operate in an R3 zone so long as it meets the physical characteristics of an Apartment House and it is used for human habitation. There is no dispute 417 OFW meets both of those requirements. The People cannot show Venice Suites has violated the LAMC by renting it on a shortterm basis because the LAMC does * 727 not regulate the length of occupancy for an Apartment House in an R3 zone.

The trial court properly granted summary adjudication as to the first and second causes of action.

City Council 21 – 82 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 The People challenge this conclusion on several grounds.

First, they contend the common use of the term apartment house informs the definition provided by the Zoning Code, which is incomplete because it only sets forth a physical description. Second, the People apply a permissive zoning scheme to argue an Apartment House is converted to a TORS when it is rented on a short-term basis and a TORS is not an allowable use in an R3 zone. Third, the People repeat their argument below, relying on disparate provisions of the Zoning Code, RSO, and TOT to contend transients may not occupy Apartment Houses. We are not persuaded.

Cal.Rptr.3d 340.) We must give the words of the statute a workable and reasonable interpretation keeping in mind the consequences that will flow from our interpretation. ( Watkins u County of Alameda ( 2009) 177 Cal. AppAth 320, 336, 98 Cal.Rptr.3d 847.)
728 B. Relevant Provisions of the LAMC
The ordinances relevant to the parties' arguments are as follows:

1. The Zoning Code
A. Principles of Statutory Interpretation " The purpose of [the Zoning Code] is to consolidate and 14] [ 15] [ 16] [ 17] [ 18] The proper interpretatidWordinate all existing zoning regulations and provisions into of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. one comprehensive zoning plan in order to designate, regulate and restrict the location and use of buildings, structures and CaYY12Sl2imba, supra, 215 Cal.AppAth at p. 1081, 156 land, for agriculture, residence, commerce, trade, industry or Cal. Rptr. 3d 1.) " Courts interpret municipal ordinances in other purposes ...... ( LAMC, § 12. 02.)
the same manner and pursuant to the same rules applicable to the interpretation of statutes." ( FMId. at p. 1087, 156 The Zoning Code provides the following definitions under Cal. Rptr. 3d 1.) " ` " ` As in any case involving statutory LAMC section 12. 03:
interpretation, our fundamental task here is to determine the Legislature' s intent so as to effectuate the law' s purpose.

APARTMENT. Same as dwelling unit. ( Added by Ord.

Citation.] We begin by examining the statute' s words, giving No. 107, 884, Eff. 9/ 23/ 56.)
them a plain and commonsense meaning.'" ' " ( FMPeople v APARTMENT HOTEL. A residential building designed Gonzalez ( 2017) 2 Cal. 5th 1138, 1141, 218 Cal. Rptr.3d 150, or used for both two or more dwelling units and six or more 394 P. 3d 1074.) " `[ W] e look to " the entire substance of the guest rooms or suites of rooms. ( Amended by Ord. No. statute ... in order to determine the scope and purpose of the 107, 884, Eff. 9/ 23/ 56.) provision .... [ Citation.]" [ Citation.] That is, we construe the words in question " ` in context, keeping in mind the nature APARTMENT HOUSE. A residential building designed and obvious purpose of the statute ....' [ Citation.]" [ Citation.] or used for three or more dwelling units or a combination of We must harmonize " the various parts of a ** 607 statutory three or more dwelling units and not more than five guest enactment ... by considering the particular clause or section in rooms or suites of rooms. ( Amended by Ord. No. 107, 884, the context ofthe statutory framework as a whole." ' " ( People Eff. 9/ 23/ 56.)
u Arroyo ( 2016) 62 CalAth 589, 595, 197 Cal. Rptr. 3d 122, DWELLING UNIT. A group of two or more rooms, one
364 P.3d 168.)
f h' h' k' t h d 4 df b f ' 1
19] [ 20] [ 21] If the statutory language is susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation, the courts look to " extrinsic aids, including the ostensible objects to be achieved, the evils to be remedied, the legislative history, public policy, contemporaneous administrative construction, and the statutory scheme of which the statute is a part.

Citations.]" ( People v Woodhead ( 1987) 43 Cal. 3d 1002, 1008, 239 Cal. Rptr. 656, 741 P.2d 154.) We interpret the statute using " ` reason, practicality, and common sense to the language at hand.' [ Citation.]" ( lllllwAilanto Properties, Inc. v City ofHalfMoon Bay ( 2006) 142 Cal.AppAth 572, 583, 48 o w is is a i c en, esigne or occupancy y one ami y
for living and sleeping purposes. ( Amended by Ord. No. 107, 884, Eff. 9/ 23/ 56.)
GUEST ROOM. Any habitable room except a kitchen,
designed or used for occupancy by one or more persons and not in a dwelling unit. (Added by Ord. No. 107, 884, Eff. 9/ 23/ 56.)
HOTEL. A residential building designated or used for or containing six or more guest rooms, or suites of rooms, which may also contain not more than one dwelling unit, but not including any institution in which human beings are WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 8 City Council 21 – 83 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 housed or detained under legal restraint. ( Amended by Ord.

No. 138, 685, Eff. 7/ 10/ 69.)
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. A building or portion
thereof designed or used for human habitation. ( Added by Ord. No. 107, 884, Eff. 9/ 23/ 56.)
729 SUITE. A group of habitable rooms designed as a
unit, and occupied by only one family, but not including a kitchen or other facilities for the preparation of food, with entrances and exits which are common to all rooms
comprising the ** 608 suite. (Added by Ord. No. 138, 685, Eff. 7/ 10/ 69.)
TENANT. A person who rents, leases or sub -leases,
through either a written or oral agreement, residential real property from another. ( Added by Ord. No. 151, 432, Eff. 10/ 12/ 78.)

TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURE [ TORS]. A residential building designed or
used for one or more dwelling units or a combination of three or more dwelling units and not more than five guest rooms or suites ofrooms wherein occupancy, by any person by reason of concession, permit, right of access, license, or other agreement is for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions ofcalendar days as full days.

Added by Ord. No 167, 689, Eff. 5/ 9/ 92.)
LAMC section 12. 10 lists the uses permitted in a R3
Multiple Dwelling Zone, including Apartment Houses, any use permitted in the " R2" two—family zone, group dwellings, multiple dwellings, boarding houses, rooming houses or light housekeeping houses, child care facilities for not more than 20 children, senior independent housing, and assisted living care housing. (LAMC, § 12. 10( A).) LAMC section 12. 10 further specifies that all uses not expressly permitted are prohibited.

2. The RSO
The RSO was enacted " to regulate rents so as to safeguard tenants from excessive rent increases, while at the same time providing landlords with just and reasonable returns from their rental units." ( LAMC, § 151. 01.) The RSO specifies that if a term is not defined within the RSO, the term " shall be construed as defined in Sections 12. 03 [ in the Zoning Code] and 152. 02 of this Code ...... ( LAMC, § 151. 02.)
Rental Units. ( Amended by Ord. No. 157, 385, Eff.
1/ 24/ 83.) All dwelling units, efficiency dwelling units, guest rooms, and suites, as defined in Section 12. 03 of this Code, and all housing accommodations ... in the City of Los Angeles, rented or offered for rent for living or dwelling purposes, the land and buildings appurtenant
thereto, and all housing services, privileges, furnishings and facilities supplied in connection with the use or
occupancy thereof, including garage and parking facilities.

Sentence Amended by Ord. No. 170,445, Eff. 5/ 6/ 95,
Oper. 7/ 5/ 95.) ... The term shall not include:

IT]
730 2. ( Amended by Ord. No. 176,472, Eff. 3/ 26/05.)
Housing accommodations in hotels, motels, inns, tourist homes and boarding and rooming houses, provided that
at such time as an accommodation has been occupied as
the primary residence of one or more ofthe same tenants for any period more than 30 days such accommodation
shall become a rental unit subject to the provisions of this chapter.

Tenant. A tenant, subtenant, lessee, sublessee or any
other person entitled to use or occupancy of a rental unit.

LAMC, § 151. 02.)

3. The TOT
The Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Ordinance of The
City of Los Angeles ( TOT) sets forth the tax rate imposed on a " transient" for occupancy of a hotel room. ( See LAMC,

21. 7. 3.) It provides the following pertinent definitions in LAMC section 21. 7. 2:
b) Hotel. " Hotel" means any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, ** 609 and includes any hotel, inn, tourist
home or house, ... apartment house, dormitory, public or private club, or other similar structure or portion thereof, ... are occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by
transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes.

Amended by Ord. No. 185, 931, Eff. 7/ l/19.)
d) Transient. ( Amended by Ord. No. 164, 961, Eff.
7/ 24/ 89, Oper. 8/ l/ 89.) " Transient" means: [¶] ... [¶] 2.

Any individual who personally exercises occupancy or is entitled to occupancy by reason of concession, permit,
right of access, license or other agreement, for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days. Any such individual so
occupying space in a hotel shall be deemed to be a transient until the period of 30 days has expired unless there is WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 9 City Council 21 – 84 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 an agreement in writing between the operator and the technology/ apartment- house> [ as ofNov. 15, 2021]; Creedon occupant providing for a longer period of occupancy. v Lunde (W.D. Wash. 1947) 90 F.Supp. 119, 120- 121.) C. The Zoning Code' s Definition of Apartment House
Controls Over the Dictionary Definition
Because the definition of Apartment House does not contain a length of occupancy requirement, the People argue the definition provided in LAMC section 12.03 is incomplete and the common usage of the term apartment house provides the necessary context to show an Apartment House is intended for long- term occupancy.

We may not read a minimum length of occupancy into the
definition of Apartment House where one is not specified, however. * 731 LAMC section 11. 01( b) provides, " Words and phrases used in this Code and not specifically defined shall be construed according to the context and approved usage of the language. [ Italics added.]" Further, LAMC section 11. 01( c) adopts "[ t]he provisions of Sections 13 and 1645 of the Civil Code of the State of California ... in the interpretation of words and phrases, unless otherwise provided herein." 4 Civil Code section 13 advises, " Words and phrases are construed according to the context and the approved usage of the language; but technical words and phrases, and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law, or are defined in the succeeding section, are to be construed according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning or definition. [ Italics added.]"
These provisions of the LAMC and the Civil Code constrain our ability to extend the definition of Apartment House beyond what is set forth in the Zoning Code. The court' s function " is simply to ascertain and declare what is in terms or in substance contained therein, not to insert what has been omitted, or to omit what has been inserted...." ( Code Civ.

Proc., § 1858; Busker v Wabtec Corp ( 2021) 11 Cal. 5th 1147, 282 Cal.Rptr.3d 333, 492 P.3d 963; Guardianship ofElan E. 2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 998, 1001, 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 528.) 5 610 Even if we were free to adopt the common
usage of the term, as the People urge us to do, we are
not convinced an Apartment House is restricted to longterm occupancy. The People rely on dictionary definitions and federal caselaw discussing the term to support their argument. ( Random House Unabridged Dictionary < https:// www.dictionary.com/ browse/ apartment-house> [ as of Nov. 15, 2021]; Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, " Apartment house" ( Aug. 21, 2014) < https:// www.britannica. com/ However, our own research shows the definition of apartment house around the time the ordinance was enacted did not restrict it to only long- term * 732 occupancy. In FAEdwards u City of Los Angeles ( 1941) 48 Cal. App. 2d 62, 69, 119 P.2d 370, for example, the court discussed a provision in the Civil Code which classified a " furnished apartment house keeper" in a category that included " innkeeper" and " hotel — keeper." ( See also Fo Village ofEuclid a Ambler Realty Co. 1926) 272 U.S. 365, 47 S. Ct. 114, 71 L.Ed. 303 [ categorizing hotels and apartment houses together].)
Likewise, the dictionary definitions for apartment house do not indicate a required length of occupancy. For
example, the 1961 edition of Webster' s Third New
International Dictionary defined " apartment building or apartment house" as " a building containing a number of separate residential units and usu. having conveniences as heat and elevators) in common" without reference to
a length of occupancy while an " apartment hotel" was
defined as " an apartment house containing suites equipped for housekeeping purposes and in addition furnished
rooms and dining service for transient and permanent
guests[.]" ( Webster' s Third New International Dictionary 1961) p. 98.) Merriam- Webster' s present- day definitions for apartment house and apartment hotel remain unchanged from 1961. ( Merriam-Webster' s Unabridged Dictionary, https:// unabridged. merriamwebster. com/unabridged/ apartment
20building [ as of Nov. 15, 2021]; Merriam- Webster' s
Unabridged Dictionary, https:// unabridged. merriamwebster.coin/unabridged/ apartment% 20hotel [ as of Nov. 15, 2021]; see also Dictionary of Architecture and Construction 1975) p. 20 [ an apartment hotel is "[ an] apartment house which supplies living quarters suitable for light housekeeping and has public dining facilities."].) It is evident the term apartment house in common usage does not indicate only
long- term occupancy, whether in 1956 or in the present day.

The People' s argument fails.

D. The Permissive Zoning Scheme Does Not Apply to
Length of Occupancy
22] The People further rely on the principle that " the expression of certain things in a statute necessarily involves exclusion of other things not expressed" to argue the
City Council' s express limitation of a TORS occupancy
to 30 days or less means that an Apartment House is
WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 10 City Council 21 – 85 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 limited to occupancies of more than 30 days. ( City of
Corona a Naulls ( 2008) 166 Cal. AppAth 418, 420- 421,
83 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 ( FMNaulls); Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. u Superior Court ( 1997) 54 Cal.App.4th 337, 345, 62
Cal.Rptr.2d 713.) The People' s permissive zoning argument is as follows: An Apartment House is a subset of a TORS. The physical characteristics of both are almost identical except a TORS may include " one or more dwelling units" while
an Apartment House may include " three or more ** 611
dwelling units." ( LAMC, § 12. 03, italics added.) In all cases, an Apartment House that provides occupancy for 30 days or less fits the definition of a TORS. A TORS is not authorized for use in an * 733 R3 zone. Thus, an Apartment House may only provide rentals for 31 days or more to be authorized to operate in an R3 zone.
23] We are not persuaded a long-term occupancy
requirement for an Apartment House may be inferred from the definition limiting TORS to occupancies of 30 days or less. The TORS provision was added by ordinance number
167, 689 and became effective May 9, 1992. ( LAMC, §

12. 03.) The definition for an Apartment House, added to the Zoning Code on September 23, 1956, had existed for
approximately 36 years prior to the ordinance which created the TORS category. There is nothing in the record to show the City Council intended to add a length of occupancy to the long- established definition of an Apartment House when it passed the TORS -related ordinance. " Courts are reluctant to accept that legislatures enact important or fundamental changes by silent indirection." ( Bunzl Distribution USA, Inc. u Franchise Tax Bd. ( 2018) 27 Cal.App.5th 986, 997, 238 Cal.Rptr.3d 645; see, e.g., California Cannabis Coalition u City of Upland (2017) 3 Cal.5th 924, 940, 222 Cal.Rptr.3d 210, 401 P. 3d 49; FaCalifornia Redevelopment Assn. v
Matosantos ( 2011) 53 CalAth 231, 260- 261, 135 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683, 267 P.3d 580.) If the City Council intended to add a length of occupancy requirement to the definition of
Apartment House, it could have done so at any time. Instead, the definition has remained the same for 65 years and is silent on the issue, indicating the City Council did not intend to regulate the length ofoccupancy in an Apartment House when it enacted the ordinance defining the term in 1956 and when it enacted the TORS provision in 1992.

Additionally, we observe a flaw in the People' s logic. Venice Suites' use is expressly authorized under a permissive zoning scheme: It operates 417 OFW as an Apartment House, a
structure that meets the definition under LAMC 12. 03 and a land use that is specifically permitted in an R3 zone.

The permissive zoning argument, on the other hand, does not apply in the manner suggested by the People because the Zoning Code does not contain " the expression of
certain things" ( i.e., long-term occupancy in an apartment house) which "necessarily involves exclusion of other things not expressed" ( i.e., short- term occupancy in an apartment house). Instead, no length of occupancy requirement is
expressed in the definitions for Apartment House, apartment hotel, hotel, or residential building. Only the TORS definition expressly authorizes short-term occupancy. Application ofthe permissive zoning scheme in the manner urged by the People would lead to an absurd result where neither short-term nor long-term occupancies would be allowed for an Apartment House, apartment hotel, hotel, or residential building because a length of occupancy is " not expressed." ( * 734 Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance a Superior Court ( 2014) 59 Cal.4th 1029, 1037, 175 Cal. Rptr.3d 601, 330 P.3d 912 statutory interpretations that lead to absurd results are to be avoided].)
The marijuana dispensary cases that rely on a permissive zoning scheme are distinguishable because, in each of those cases, marijuana dispensaries either did not fall within the city' s list of allowable uses or were expressly prohibited.

Carrnshimba, supra, 215 Cal. AppAth at p. 1073, 156
Cal. Rptr. 3d 1; FMNaulls, supra, 166 Cal.AppAth at pp. 420- 421, 83 Cal.Rptr.3d 1; FM ** 612 City of Dana Point u
New Method Wellness, Inc. ( 2019) 39 Cal. App. 5th 985, 989- 990, 252 Cal. Rptr. 3d 541; Urgent Care Medical Services v City ofPasadena ( 2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 1086, 1094, 230 Cal.Rptr.3d 892.) That is not the case here.

E. The RSO and TOT Do Not Regulate the Use of an
Apartment House
24] Neither are we persuaded by the People' s argument the Zoning Code must be read in conjunction with the RSO and TOT to conclude only tenants and not transients may occupy Apartment Houses. This argument was rejected by the trial court below and we agree it requires a selective reading of disparate portions ofthe Zoning Code, RSO, and TOT without regard to the intent behind each of these ordinances.

The People argue 417 OFW is subject to the requirements of the RSO, which extends to all rental units. (LAMC, § 151. 00, WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 11 City Council 21 – 86 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 et seq.) " Rental units" include "[ a] ll dwelling units, efficiency dwelling units, guest rooms, and suites, as defined in Section

12. 03 [ of the Zoning Code]" but exclude, among other things, h] ousing accommodations in hotels, motels, inns, tourist homes and boarding and rooming houses, provided that
at such time as an accommodation has been occupied as
the primary residence of one or more of the same tenants for any period more than 30 days such accommodation
shall become a rental unit subject to the provisions of this chapter." ( LAMC, § 151. 02.) A tenant under the RSO is defined as a " person entitled to use or occupancy of a rental unit." ( Ibid.) According to the People, a rental unit, by definition, is limited to occupancies lasting longer than 30 days. Thus, a tenant under the RSO is someone who occupies a rental unit for more than 30 days.

By contrast, a transient is defined by the TOT, in
pertinent part, as "[ a] ny individual who personally exercises occupancy ... for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less[.]" Relying on the definitions for rental units and tenant found in the RSO and transient in the TOT, the People argue that only a tenant is entitled to use or occupy rental units.

Transients, on the other hand, may not occupy rental units because occupancies of30 days or less are * 735 not included within the definition of rental units. Because the dwelling units, guest rooms, or suites in an apartment house constitute rental units subject to the RSO and transients may not occupy rental units, the People reason that transients also may not occupy apartment houses.

We are not persuaded. As we discussed above, the City
Council enacted the Zoning Code to " consolidate and
coordinate all existing zoning regulations and provisions into one comprehensive zoning plan in order to designate, regulate and restrict the location and use of buildings, structures and land, for agriculture, residence, commerce, trade, industry or other purposes." ( LAMC, § 12. 02.) In short, the Zoning Code is intended to regulate all uses of buildings for residential purposes.

The RSO, on the other hand, regulates rents, in pertinent part, to safeguard tenants from excessive rent increases due to the lack of "decent, safe and sanitary housing at affordable rent levels." ( LAMC, § 151. 01.) It is clear the City Council enacted the RSO to address a shortage of affordable housing.

Its stated purpose is not to resolve a general housing shortage by regulating short-term rentals. Neither does the RSO state an intent to regulate the occupancy of residential buildings, as asserted by the People. It merely denies the benefit of rent control to those individuals who rent accommodations at hotels, motels, inns, tourist homes and boarding ** 613 and rooming houses for 30 days or less. ( LAMC, § 151. 02.) The rules of statutory construction dictate we rely on the Zoning Code rather than the RSO and TOT to effectuate
the City Council' s purpose. ( People v Gonzalez, supra, 2 Cal.5th at p. 1141, 218 Cal.Rptr.3d 150, 394 P.3d 1074.) Here, we are required to decide what is an allowable use of a residential building located in an R3 zone. The Zoning Code addresses precisely this issue because it regulates all uses of buildings for residential purposes.

As discussed above, the Zoning Code expressly authorizes the use of an Apartment House in an R3 zone for human
habitation with no length of occupancy restriction. The Zoning Code does not limit the occupancy of Apartment
Houses to only tenants. Even if it did, however, the Zoning Code defines a tenant as "[ a] person who rents, leases or sub -leases, through either a written or oral agreement, residential real property from another," with no length of occupancy restriction. We decline to disregard the Zoning Code' s definition of tenant and adopt the RSO definition of tenant to impose a length of occupancy restriction that is not there.

In any case, the Zoning Code, the RSO, and the TOT do
not conflict with the concept of an Apartment House that encompasses both short- term and long-term occupancies.

Indeed, the TOT expressly contemplates that Apartment
Houses may be occupied by transients, who exercise
occupancy for 30 * 736 days or less. Under the TOT, a hotel is defined as " any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any ... apartment house, dormitory, public or private club, or other similar structure or portion thereof ..." ( LAMC,

21. 7.2( b) [ italics added].)
By its plain language, the RSO extends the benefits of rent control to the dwelling units, guest rooms, and suites that make up Apartment Houses ifthe occupancy lasts longer than 30 days because a landlord may not demand more than the permitted maximum monthly rent, which is adjusted from
time to time. ( LAMC, § 151. 04.) That the RSO applies only to monthly, and not weekly or daily, rent does not compel the conclusion that an Apartment House is limited to longterm occupancy in the Zoning Code. If an Apartment House is occupied for 30 days or less, it simply does not benefit from WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 12 City Council 21 – 87 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App. 5th 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D.A. R. 11, 835 the provisions of the RSO. Our conclusion that an Apartment House may include short- term or long- term occupancies does We Concur:
not conflict with the RSO or the TOT.

DISPOSITION
GRIMES, Acting P. J.

WILEY, J.

All Citations
The judgment is affirmed. Venice Suites is entitled to costs on appeal. 71 Cal. App. 5th 715, 286 Cal. Rptr.3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op.

Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A.R. 11, 835
Footnotes
Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

LAMC section 12. 03 defines an Apartment House as " A residential building designed or used for three or more dwelling units or a combination of three or more dwelling units and not more than five guest rooms or suites of rooms."
2 Under the Mello Act, "[ t]he conversion or demolition of existing residential dwelling units occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income ... shall not be authorized unless provision has been made for the replacement of those dwelling units with units for persons and families of low or moderate income." ( Gov.

Code, § 65590, subd. ( b).) The City must first determine " that replacement of all or any portion of the converted or demolished dwelling units is feasible ...." ( Gov. Code, § 65590, subd. ( b).) Once the City makes such a determination, then replacing dwelling units occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income is required. ( Gov. Code, § 65590, subd. ( b).)
Venice Suites does not argue the deposition testimony or the City' s report are dispositive of the issue. The parties acknowledge a city's interpretation of an ambiguous portion of its own code "is entitled to deference," but the court independently reviews the meaning or application of the law. (PCity of Monterey v. Carrnshimba 2013) 215 Cal. AppAth 1068, 1091, 156 Cal. Rptr.3d 1 (_] Carrnshimba).) For purposes of this opinion, we conclude we need not rely on the City' s interpretations of the LAMC. 4 Civil Code section 1645 provides "[ t]echnical words are to be interpreted as usually understood by persons in the profession or business to which they relate, unless clearly used in a different sense." It does not apply here.

In further support of their argument that an Apartment House is intended for long- term occupancy, the People indicate in their reply brief that the definition of apartment house contained in the California Building Code includes " primarily permanent" occupants. ( 24 Cal. Code of Reg., § 310. 3.) This definition is adopted by the Los Angeles Building Code ( LAMC, § 91. 101. 1, et seq.). We find the argument irrelevant to the issue at hand.

As shown above, the Zoning Code provides a definition for Apartment House and we may not disregard it to adopt a definition provided in a different section of the LAMC or in a state regulation. Accordingly, we deny the People' s supplemental request for judicial notice of LAMC sections 91. 201 and 91. 202, filed April 26, 2021.

City Council 21 – 88 4/2/2024
People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Cal. App.Sth 715 ( 2021) 286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 598, 21 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11, 565, 2021 Daily Journal D. A. R. 11, 835 End of Document 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works.

WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U. S. Government Works. 14 City Council 21 – 89 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Kathryn Levassiur <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 29,
To: eComment
Cc: Home
Subject: InOpposition ofItem21STRs
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearMayor Amezcua andSantaAnaCityCouncil Members,
Myname isKathryn Levassiur, aresident ofHuntington Beach andthefounder ofHBSTRA (Huntington BeachShort-Term Rental Alliance). Ihavebeenavolunteer Airbnb Community Leader forallofOrange County andtheInlandEmpire, renting outmyproperty forshortandmid-termrentals since2015. Iam currently inmy4thyearasapermitted andlicensed STRholder, withawealth ofpersonal anecdotal experience inoperating underapermitted andregulated program.

Onbehalf ofHBSTRA andAirbnb hosts inOrange County (including SantaAna) andtheInlandEmpire, we strongly urgethecouncil tooppose agenda item #21regarding STRs.

SantaAnahasnumerous reasons toembrace visitors seeking tostayinbeautiful, furnished homes forbusiness, vacation, orboth. Thecityisconveniently located nearamajorairport, stunning beaches, Disneyland, amajor league baseball team, world renown universities andhospitals, plustheunique charm andhistory oftheCityof SantaAnaitselftopeople wanting toexperience abeautiful southern California city. Adopting STRregulations would notonlycreate ahealthy revenue stream from visitor-generated lodging taxrevenue butalsoincrease sales taxrevenue andsupport localbusinesses inSantaAna. STRs aregoodforlocalbusinesses.

Orange, yourneighboring citytothenorth, serves asapositive example ofhowadopting fairandreasonable regulations canbenefit thecommunity. Please reject agenda item #21andworkwiththelocal community ona sensible plan.

Sincerely,
KathrynLevassiur
Huntington BeachShort-TermRentalAlliance
Cell:

Email: Website:
1 City Council 21 – 90 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: LorenaAvonce <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 29,
To: eComment
Subject: Item21, emergency prohibiting ShortTermRentals Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearMembers oftheCityCouncil,
Iamwriting toyouasaconcerned citizen andownerofashort-termrentalproperty intheCityofSantaAna.

Asanactive member ofthiscommunity, Iunderstand theimportance ofupholding localregulations and ensuring thesafety andwell-beingofourresidents.

Myshort-termrentalproperty isowner-occupied whichallowsmetopersonally oversee allguest stays. This arrangement allows metomaintain astrong presence onthepremises andpromptly address anyconcerns thatmayarise. Iwanttoemphasize thatithasnotcaused anydisruption tothepeaceorsafetyofourcity. I amcommitted tobeingaresponsible hostandhaveimplemented measures toensure thatmyguests respect thelocalcommunity andadhere toallapplicable lawsandregulations.

It'simportant tonotethatshort-termrentals, suchasmine, contribute tothelocaleconomy byattracting visitors fromoutofstate. These guests oftenpatronize localbusinesses, restaurants, andattractions, thereby supporting ourcommunity'sgrowth andvitality.

Additionally, myshort-termrentalserves asasource ofincome formyfamily. Duetomychild'ssevere disabilities, Irecently hadtostopworking toprovide full-timecare. Renting outourproperty allowsmeto contribute financially tomyfamily'sneedswhilebalancing thedemands ofcaregiving.

Ibelieve thatshort-termrentals, whenmanaged responsibly, cancontribute positively toourcity'seconomy andprovide visitors withuniqueaccommodations whilerespecting therightsandwell-beingofourresidents. I amdedicated tocontinuing tooperate myrentalproperty inamanner thatreflects theseprinciples.

Iappreciate theopportunity tocommunicate withyouonthismatter andamopentoanyquestions or concerns youmayhave. Thank youforyourattention tothisissue, andIlookforward toyourcontinued support infostering asafeandthriving community.

Sincerely,
Lorena Castaneda
2 City Council 21 – 91 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: VuHoang <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday,
To: eComment
Subject: Item21, emergency prohibiting Shorttermrentals Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

From: VuHoang
March 30, 2024
To: SantaAnaCityCouncil
DearHonorable Council Members,
Iamwriting toexpress mydeep concerns regarding theproposed banonshort-termrentals (STRs) inourcity.

Asamember ofthecommunity whoactively participates inhosting short-termrentals, Ibelieve itiscrucial to highlight thenumerous benefits thatthese rentals bringtoourcityanditsresidents.

Firstandforemost, STRs provide invaluable supplemental income formany families inourcommunity, including myself. Inanincreasingly challenging economic climate, theability toutilize ourproperties forshorttermrentals hasbeenalifeline formany individuals andfamilies, helping uscover expenses andmake ends meet. Banning STRs would directly threaten thelivelihoods ofcountless hosts andtheirfamilies.

Furthermore, short-termrentals playasignificant roleinsupporting ourlocaleconomy. Theyattract visitors whocontribute toourcity'stourism industry bypatronizing localbusinesses, restaurants, andattractions. This influxoftourism notonlygenerates revenue forlocalentrepreneurs butalsocreates jobopportunities and stimulates economic growth inourcommunity.

Additionally, STRs offertravelers aunique andpersonalized experience thathotels oftencannot replicate.

Many visitors seekoutshort-termrentals fortheir convenience, affordability, andtheopportunity toimmerse themselves inthelocal culture. Byproviding alternative accommodations, STRs contribute toamorediverse andinclusive tourism landscape, attracting awiderrange ofvisitors toourcity.

Moreover, short-termrentals promote community engagement andinteraction. Ashosts, wetakepridein welcoming guests fromallovertheworldandsharing ourlocalknowledge andhospitality withthem. This exchange fosters cultural understanding andstrengthens thebonds within ourcommunity, ultimately enhancing thequality oflifeforresidents andvisitors alike.

Inlightofthese benefits, Iurge youtoreconsider theproposed banonshort-termrentals andinstead explore alternative solutions thataddress anyconcerns while preserving therightsofhosts andtheinterests ofour community. Collaboration anddialogue areessential infinding abalanced approach thatsupports thediverse needs ofourcityanditspeople.

Thank youforconsidering myperspective onthisimportant issue. Itrustthatyouwilltakeintoaccount the voices ofallstakeholders asyoudeliberate onthefuture ofshort-termrentals inourcity. 3 City Council 21 – 92 4/2/2024
Sincerely,
VuHoang
4 City Council 21 – 93 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: AnaGomez <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda Item #21- Ordinance Prohibiting ShortTermRentals Attachments: LettertoCityCouncil member April2nd2024meeting.docx Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Please seeattached
5 City Council 21 – 94 4/2/2024
AsaresidentofSantaAna, over22years, andahomeowner, Iwouldliketoask citycouncilmemberstovoteNOonAgendaitem#21 -ProhibitingShortTerm RentalsintheCityofSantaAna.

Asashort-termrentalhomeowner, (werentaroominourhome), Ifindthe statementsmadeinthecitystaffreportinaccurate.

1. Excessivenoise, parkingproblemsanddegradation: Thisisfalseasmost, if notall, shorttermrentalsplatformsdonotallowpartiesorlargeevents. I daresaythatweexperiencemorenoise, trashandpollutionfromfireworks th duringthe4 ofJulyeachyear (thisincludeslegalandillegalfireworks).

Theparkingproblemscreatedbyshorttermrentalsarenonexistent. Inour situation, ourunitaccommodatesforamaximumoftwopeople (1car) and insomecasesourguest(s) donothaveacarandrelyonUberandorLyftfor transportation. Again, IseemoreparkingproblemsinWashingtonSquare, especiallythestreetsclosesttoBristol/CivicCenterDrive, thathomeowners hadtorequestpermitparkingonly. Homesrentedtonumerousindividuals canhave5-6carsand/orhomeownersthathaveconvertedthegaragesto dwellingunits (legalorillegal) thustakingawaytheabilitytoparkingarage and/ordriveway. Shorttermrentalsarenotthecauseofparkingproblems.

Shorttermrentalsdonotleadtodegradationofaneighborhoodsresidential character. Iseemorelongtermand/orowner-occupiedhomesthat contributemoretothedegradationofaneighborhoodthanshortterm rentals. Christmaslightontheexteriorofahomeyear-round, trashand/or trashbinsvisiblefromthestreet, largecommercialtrucksparkedon residentialneighborhoods, overgrownneglectedyards.

2. Shorttermrentalsreduceavailablehousing. TheCityofSantaAnaRegional HousingAllocationfor2021 -2029is3,137permanenthousingunits. TheCity ofSantaAnaPlanningDivision, MajorPlanningProjectsandmonthly development, reportsthatthereare, sofar, atotalof10,434 residential/multifamilyunitscompletedandorintheworks. Inan announcementpostedNovember13, 2023, thecitystates “\[i\]nthecurrent RHNAcyclefrom2021to2029, SantaAnahasalreadymetoverhalfofour City Council 21 – 95 4/2/2024
housinggoals, andweareontracktoexceedthemwellbefore2029.” Short termrentalsdonotreducethecity’shousingneeds.

3. FiscalImpactofBanningShortTermRentalscouldpossiblybemillionsasthe citywillloseoutoncollectingTOT’s (transientoccupancytax). WithMeasure Xsoontoexpirein2029, thecitywillloseoutrevenueitreliedontosupport emergencyresponseservices, homelessness, maintainingseniorcitizen programsandafterschoolprograms. Banningshorttermsrentalsissimilar to “Throwingthebabyoutwiththebathwater.”
Wehavemetwiththeplanningcommissionbackin2022, tostartdiscussionon implementingareasonableandfairshort-termrentalprogramthatbalancesthe needsofthecityandshort-termrentalhomeownerresidents. Justthispast December (December th 11 2023) theplanningcommission, underaworkstudy session, addressedhavingashort-termrentalprograminplace. Amajorityof appointedplanningcommissionerswereinfavorofhavingaprograminplace (see th planningcommissionmeetingvideodatedDecember11 2023) andsomehave admittedtoutilizingshorttermrentalfortheirownpersonaluseand/orbusiness use. Shortlythereafter, theplanningcommissionreachedouttosomeofusshort termrentalownersforourinput, suggestionsetc. Itwasasurpriseanddisappoint tohearabouttheproposedordinancebanningshorttermrentals.

Westronglybelieveinworkingwiththecityingettingaprograminplaceisthe bestforallpartiesinvolved. Havingaprograminplacewillhelpwiththe proliferationofshort-termrentals, thebadactorsandabsenteeowners.

VoteNOontheproposedordinancetoProhibitShortTermRentals.

Thankyou,
AnaGomez
City Council 21 – 96 4/2/2024
SantaAnaResident
City Council 21 – 97 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Flores, Gaston
Sent: Tuesday, April2, 20249:06AM
To: eComment
Subject: FW: Contact theCityCouncil Submission
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April1, 202410:09AM
To: Flores, Gaston <[email protected]>
Subject: ContacttheCityCouncilSubmission
Attention: Thisemail originated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Name
DavidDelancellotti
Email
Address
SantaAna, California92706
UnitedStates
MapIt
Phone
714) 614-0840
Whoisthis message for?
MayorValerieAmezcua
MayorProTemThaiVietPhan
Councilmember Benjamin Vazquez
Councilmember JessieLopez
Councilmember PhilBacerra
Councilmember Johnathan RyanHernandez
Councilmember DavidPenaloza
Comments orquestions
OurfamilyhaslivedinSantaAnaover20yearsmovingherefromCostaMesainlate2001. Wehaveneighbors andfriendsas wellofourselveswhoinfrequently utilizeutilizethebenefitsofAirbnbtooffsetourlivelihood. Weabsolutely believethatthere canbeacompromise whenitcomestoshorttermrentalsinSantaAna. Takingthisprivilegecompletely awaywithno amendments andnoexceptions showsnocompromiseandputsfamilies likeoursatrisk. I'maskingsimplyforasimple resolutiontoacritical needforourfamily. IalsoknowIhaveafewfriendswholiveinourneighborhood whosharethesame request. Iamaskingforyoursupport nottoproposeabanonshorttermrentals. Wearealwaysavailabletotalkliveoronthe phoneandappreciateyoursupportasalways.

ThankYou
DaviddeLancellotti
6 City Council 21 – 98 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Michele <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday,
To: eComment
Subject: ShortTerm Rental
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hello:

Iownaproperty thatIuseforashorttermrental inOCandasanextremely responsible host, I provide ahomeforfamilies whoaredisplaced because ofdamage totheirhome, relocating to Orange County andsometimes forpeople whowantanextended vacation sothattheycanlearn aboutourbeautiful areaasapotential placetomoveoneday. Ihaveevenhosted clergy relocating toOCtoleadanewcongregation aswellanelderly gentlemen whoneeded tosafelyescape the harshwinters oftheSierra'swithhiselderlydog.

Myneighbors arealways warmandwelcoming toguests, collaborative withme, andhavenothad onecomplaint aboutthesituation.

Youmayconsider exploring solutions thattheyhaveemployed inScottsdale, Arizona tomakethe situation morepalatable foreveryone.

Please reconsider yourchoices andknowthatShortTermRentals provide acritical option forfamilies whomaybeinachallenging situation.

Thank youforconsideration,
Michele Norban
7 City Council 21 – 99 4/2/2024
Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
www.santa-ana.org/parks
Item # 22
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
March 19, 2024
TOPIC: Youth Commission Informational Report

AGENDA TITLE
Youth Commission Informational Report (continued from the meeting of March 19, 2024, Item No. 25)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Accept informational report and provide direction to staff.

GOVERNMENT CODE 84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION:

Background
At the February 20, 2024 meeting, the City Council directed staff to return with options regarding the future of the Youth Commission. Accordingly, staff conducted preliminary research regarding different commission structures, alternatives to a commission, and out-of-the-box considerations as options to obtain greater youth involvement. Below are some options for the City Council to consider.

1. Keep Youth Commission as-is. Staff requests that Councilmembers encourage their appointees to attend meetings and remind them that they receive $100.00 per meeting. The Commission is currently missing appointees from Ward 1, Ward 3, and the Mayor (appointment listed separately on agenda for March 19, 2024).

2. Disband Youth Commission.

3. Staff-run Youth Advisory Committee. The City of Anaheim was experiencing similar issues with lack of quorum and participation and recently dissolved their Youth Commission and established a Youth Advisory Committee to be appointed and managed by staff, meetings to be held with any number of members present, and not subject to the Brown Act.

4. Subcommittee for Parks and Recreation with two rotating seats for members of the Youth Subcommittee to attend Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission meetings as commissioners.

City Council 22 – 1 4/2/2024
Youth Commission Informational Report
March 19, 2024

Page 2 ends

5. Create two seats on the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission as done for the two Senior representatives. Youth would submit applications to the City Clerk and staff would select from the applicants for approval by the City Council.

In terms of keeping the Youth Commission as-is (Option No. 1), the City Council had inquired about the use of Zoom, providing transportation, and changing the location of meetings. The Youth Commission was created by the City Council as an advisory body and its members are appointed by the City Council. Therefore, its meetings are subject to the Brown Act; the provisions of the Brown Act preclude the City from conducting a completely virtual meeting. In terms of providing transportation, the City does not have the proper driver certifications to transport youth individually. Additionally, there are additional insurance and liability concerns pertaining to transporting and supervising minors. Alternative locations for meetings could be investigated and possibly implemented, noting that as commissioners are appointed by ward, a location that is closer and more convenient for one commissioner may pose a greater hardship for another commissioner. Staff recommends maintaining a central location for the meetings at City Hall.

Recommendation
Staff recommends Option No. 5: the creation of two seats on the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission meeting, similar to the two Senior representatives.

Interested youth would submit applications to the City Clerk and staff would review applicants, interview, and select two for the Commission, subject to approval by the City Council. Councilmembers are asked to encourage youth to apply for this opportunity.

Appointees made by the Parks and Recreation Staff would be full commissioners on the Parks and Recreation Commission, with a $100 per meeting stiped.

Should the City Council provide direction to staff related to Option nos. 2-5, staff will return at a future meeting for formal action by the City Council to implement the chosen direction.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

EXHIBIT(S)
Submitted By: Hawk Scott, Executive Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Approved By: Tom Hatch, Interim City Manager
City Council 22 – 2 4/2/2024
Planning and Building Agency
www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building/
Item # 23
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 2, 2024
TOPIC: 2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue

AGENDA TITLE
Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2024-01 to Amend the Zoning Map District Designation for the Properties Located at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue Published in the OC Reporter on March 20, 2024.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

1. Approve the introduction and first reading of an ordinance approving Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2024-01.

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2024- 01 AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2101 AND 2109 E. SANTA CLARA AVENUE (APN: 396-261-26 AND 396-261-38) FROM GENERAL AGRICULTURAL (A1) TO ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL (C5)

2. Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (SCH No. 2024010298), Environmental Review No. 2023-16, prepared for the project, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Donald Ellis with Stream Realty Partners (applicant), representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (property owner), is requesting approval of Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2024-01, to facilitate construction of a fast food eating establishment with drive-through operations (McDonald’s) at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue. The site is currently zoned as General Agricultural (A1), and the amendment application would allow a change to the zoning classification to Arterial Commercial (C5), in order to allow the proposed eating establishment and drive-through operations. Staff is recommending approval of the amendment application as the proposed project will enhance underutilized lots and provide additional services to City Council 23 – 1 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 2 ends

residents, workers, and visitors in the area. Moreover, the project complies with the General Plan goals and policies as it seeks to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts through the promotion of a clean, safe, and creative environment. Lastly, the project will not negatively impact the surrounding community as the project has been designed to minimize impacts to the nearby sensitive land uses.

Planning Commission Action and Background
On February 26, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for this project and voted 4:1 (Commissioner Ramos dissenting and Commissioners Pham and Leo absent) to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2024-01. At the same public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 3:2 (Commissioner Escamilla and Ramos dissenting and Commissioners Pham and Leo absent) to approve Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2024-01, permitting the proposed drive-through operations for McDonald’s. During the public hearing, the Planning Commission discussed items of concern, including traffic safety and historic eligibility of the two residential structures on the site. The additional items of consideration discussed by the Planning Commission are further analyzed in the Environment Impact’s Historic or Cultural Significance and Traffic and Safety Impacts sections of this staff report.

Lastly, a second CUP application for 24-hour operations of the drive-through facility was ultimately withdrawn by the project applicant at the public hearing, and was no longer considered by the Planning Commission, nor a part of the overall project approval request. As such, the project’s proposed hours of operation are between 5:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. (midnight) for both indoor dining and the drive-through operations, 7 days a week. Any future request for operating hours beyond midnight would require review and approval of a separate CUP for after-hours operation.

DISCUSSION
Project Description
Table 1: Project and Location Information
Item Information
Project Address and Council Ward 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue – Ward 3 Nearest Intersection North Tustin Avenue and East Santa Clara Avenue General Plan Designation General Commercial (GC) – No change Existing Zoning Designation General Agricultural (A1)
Proposed Zoning Designation Arterial Commercial (C5)
North Commercial center
East Drive-through restaurant
South Multi-family residential (Woodlyn North
Condominiums), preschool/kindergarten,
commercial center
Surrounding Land Uses
West California Highway Patrol station and parking for
Horizon Apartments multi-family residential
City Council 23 – 2 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 3 ends

community
Property Size 0.81-acres (35,400 square feet)
Existing Site Development
The subject sites contain two one-story, single-family
residences approximately 2,530 and 3,904 square feet in size, with associated accessory structures.

Existing Site Uses Single-family residences (2)
Proposed Building Size 3,975 square feet
Use Permissions Allowed with an amendment application (zone change) and conditional use permit (CUP).

Zoning Code Sections Affected Uses SAMC Section 41-424.5 Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-425-428
The site is currently zoned as General Agricultural (A1), and the proposed project includes an amendment application (zone change) to change the zoning classification to Arterial Commercial (C5) in order to allow the proposed eating establishment and drivethrough operations. As part of the overall scope of work, the applicant is proposing to demolish two residential structures and associated improvements on two legal lots (2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue), including the associated pool, asphalt concrete paving, and vegetation, in order to construct a new 3,975-square-foot fast food establishment for McDonald’s with drive-through operations.

The eating establishment is proposed to be integrated within an existing commercial center and would maintain reciprocal access. The establishment would be accessible via three existing vehicle driveway approaches, two along Tustin Avenue and the third along Santa Clara Avenue, with no new driveway/entries proposed as part the project. However, the primary vehicular ingress and egress points and the proposed parking lot would primarily be accessible from the existing driveway along Santa Clara Avenue. The drivethrough would be accessible from the existing driveway along Tustin Avenue, and vehicles would travel west/southwest along the proposed drive-through.

As proposed, the establishment would include a dual drive-through lane, limited to the ordering/menu board area and a bypass lane near the pick-up window. The two drivethrough lanes will be available for ordering, which will then merge into a single drivethrough lane for pick-up window services. The bypass lane will allow vehicles that have already received their meals to bypass any queued vehicles and ultimately exit via a proposed new driveway along Santa Clara Avenue. Each lane is proposed to have vehicular stacking lanes exceeding the minimum required 80 feet from the center of the pick-up window and 80 feet from the order point.

The applicant proposes various off-site and on-site improvements that include improvements to the public right-of-way (i.e., sidewalks, curbs, street lighting, and access drives), extensive landscaping (perimeter and parking lot), enhanced paving at the two driveway entries, a parking lot with 32 parking stalls, a decorative trash enclosure, and parking lot fixtures. Work would also include the removal of the western most driveway along Santa Clara and replace it with sidewalk, and rebuild the eastern most existing City Council 23 – 3 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 4 ends

driveway located along Santa Clara Avenue. The proposed eating establishment would include fast-food operations, such as indoor food preparation, cooking, indoor and outdoor eating areas, and restrooms. It will include approximately 802 square feet of dining area with seating for over 30 guests. The proposed hours of operation are between 5 a.m. to 12 a.m. for both indoor dining and the drive-through operations, 7 days a week.

The building is designed in a California contemporary architectural style with a neutral/dark color palette and tones along the outer facades, which would involve materials such as plaster/stucco, aluminum, and metals. The site would provide approximately 8,604 square feet of landscaping throughout the site and the proposed plant palette would consist of a high quality plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and groundcover. The proposed planter areas would be constructed along the northern, western, and southern site perimeters and would provide decorative screening and a buffer between the eating establishment and the adjacent, off-site land uses, in addition to being placed centrally within the proposed surface parking lot and adjacent to the proposed drive-through. Table 2 below provides a detailed comparison of the project’s compliance with the applicable land use and development standards.

Table 2: Development Standards
Standard Required by General
Commercial (C5) Zone Provided
Front yard 15 feet minimum Complies; 15 feet
Side yard (interior) 0 feet minimum Complies; 29-125 feet Rear yard 0 feet minimum Complies; 39 feet
Lot Size &
Frontage 15,000 sq. ft. and 120 feet Complies; 35,400 sq. ft. and 200 ft.

Building height 35 feet maximum Complies; 23 feet
Parking 32 spaces minimum (8 spaces
per 1,000 sq. ft. restaurant) Complies; 32 spaces
Floor Area Ratio
(F.A.R.) 0.50 FAR maximum Complies; 0.11 FAR
Stacking Distance 160 feet; 80 feet to menu board
and 80 feet to pick-up window
Complies; 113 feet from the order point/
menu board to beginning of drive-through
lane, 147 feet from pick-up window/pay
window to the menu board
Project Background
The earliest aerial imagery from 1938 shows that the subject properties appear to be first developed as an orchard. No buildings or structures were present on site at this time and most of the surrounding area was used for orchards, with some houses and agricultural buildings in the vicinity. The single-family residence addressed as 2101 E.

Santa Clara Avenue was constructed at an unknown date and moved to the site in 1967. In 1967, a permit was issued to relocate the home within the site and build a new garage approximately 660 square feet in size. The single-family residence addressed as 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue was constructed circa 1957 and included the main house and garage. The house remained surrounded by orchard trees, as well as most of the City Council 23 – 4 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 5 ends

surrounding properties in the area. The rest of the now-commercial shopping center remained undeveloped until 1972. Today, the two subject properties are legal nonconforming, as they do not meet most of the development standards for the underlying zone and were constructed prior to 1960.

Based on permit and title records, both 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue were owned by the Newcomb family until they were sold to SRP Stater Bros, LLC in February 2021. In April 2022, Development Project (DP) Review application (No. 2022-06) was submitted for review and consideration by the City’s Development Review Committee (DRC). The applicant revised the project following the first community meeting in late April 2022, and subsequently resubmitted the DP application in December 2022.

Thereafter, several site plan changes and project submittals were made to the City following the second community meeting in February 2023. In March 2023, the property owners submitted a voluntary lot merger application (No. 2023-02) to consolidate 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue into a single legal lot. The lot merger application was executed and recorded in June 2023. Before the DP application could be deemed complete, the project underwent several months of environmental review which concluded in late December 2023. Subsequently, the DP application was deemed complete on December 13, 2023, and the required entitlement applications were submitted January 8, 2024.

Project Analysis
The subject site is zoned General Agricultural (A1). The allowable land uses and development standards pertaining to the A1 zoning district would render the project infeasible, as eating establishments are prohibited by the A1 zoning district. Approval of an amendment application to change the zoning district to Arterial Commercial (C5) is required for the project.

The proposed zone change intends to align the subject site with the existing shopping center development to the north and east, and intends to align with the commercial corridor along Tustin Avenue, which is largely zoned C5. Moreover, the proposed C5 zoning district designation is also consistent with the new General Commercial (GC) General Plan Land Use Element designation for the site that resulted from the April 2022 General Plan Update. This land use designation encourages developments that provide highly visible and accessible shopping opportunities along arterial corridors and supports the development and continued operation of recreational, cultural, entertainment, employment, and educational opportunities near established residential neighborhoods. The proposed project has been designed as a single-story McDonald’s building with a maximum height of 23 feet to the top of the parapet. In designing the proposed development, consideration was given to scale, massing, and architecture of the project to ensure that it complements the existing buildings within the surrounding development.

General Plan Consistency
City Council 23 – 5 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 6 ends

The General Plan Update (GPU) was adopted in April 2022, after a seven-year effort of extensive community participation. Engagement efforts and interactions with the community included over 60 community meetings and workshops, online surveys, direct mailers to property owners and tenants, and multiple study sessions. Moreover, they included one-on-one meetings with the Planning Commission and City Council, which allowed for an informed and inclusive decision-making process. These efforts resulted in the crafting of the land use plan within the Land Use Element that reflects the community’s visions for Santa Ana’s growth and development citywide. The updated Land Use Element of the General Plan reflects and sets the community’s land use and development policies and a vision for future development of the City.

Prior to the GPU, the subject properties had a split land use designation of Institutional (INS) and General Commercial (GC). As a result of the GPU, the land use designation for the properties were updated to fully be GC, consistent with the adjacent commercial center properties. However, the GPU did result in a zoning inconsistency, as the properties were still zoned General Agricultural (A1), which does not allow for eating establishments. To address this inconsistency, the overall project includes an amendment application to change the zoning district to Arterial Commercial (C5) required for the project.

The approval of the proposed project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC). The project would provide an added amenity to the existing commercial shopping center and would promote a land use that enhances the City’s economic fiscal viability and mitigates any potential impacts to the surrounding community. The overall operations will contribute to the viability of the site creating a business environment that is safe and attractive. Moreover, the project has been designed to be consistent with several goals and policies of the General Plan as discussed below.
• Goal LU-2: Land Use Needs – Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana’s diverse needs
o Policy 2.2 Capture Local Spending – Encourage a range of commercial uses to capture a greater share of local spending and offer a range of employment opportunities.
o Policy 2.6 Encourage Investment – Promote rehabilitation of properties and encourage increased levels of capital investment to create a safe and attractive environment.
o Policy 2.7 Business Incubator – Support land use decisions that encourage the creation, development, and retention of business in Santa Ana.

The project is consistent with Goal LU-2 and Policies 2.2, 2.6, and 2.7, as it will allow for additional service to Santa Ana residents and visitors, thereby positively contributing to the economic viability of the area by promoting local spending, offering employment opportunities, and providing a safe workplace. In addition, the applicant is making an City Council 23 – 6 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 7 ends

investment to rehabilitate the site to allow for a safe and attractive establishment by expanding the commercial center and improving the circulation throughout. Lastly, the proposed project would also preserve the character of the existing commercial area and promotes the rehabilitation of properties by proposing to remove a blighted and underutilized land use to create a safe and attractive environment. • Goal LU-3: Compatibility of Uses – Preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts.
o Policy 3.4 Compatible Development – Ensure that the scale and massing of new development is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding built environment.
o Policy 3.7 Attractive Environment – Promote a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.

The project is consistent with Goal LU-3 and Policies 3.4 and 3.7, as the proposed improvements would preserve the character of the existing commercial area. The scale and massing of the new project is proposed to be compatible with the existing commercial center, as consideration was given to scale, massing, and architecture of the project to ensure that it complements the existing buildings within the surrounding development. Moreover, the project would include aesthetically pleasing features, such as landscaping with a variety of plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and groundcover, which would further help enhance the viability of the commercial center, would create a harmonious environment, and would help promote a clean and safe environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors. • Goal EP-1: Job Creation and Retention – Foster a dynamic local economy that provides and create employment opportunities for all residents in the City. o Policy 1.2 Attract Business – Promote new and retain existing jobproducing businesses that provide living-wage employment opportunities.

The project is consistent with Goal EP-1 and Policy 1.2, as the proposed improvements would help generate additional economic growth and stability in the City by further activating underutilized parcels and helping generate property and sales tax revenue.

Furthermore, the proposed project would help create a job-producing establishment, thereby providing employment opportunities to Santa Ana residents. • Goal EP-3: Business Friendly Environment – Promote a business friendly environment where businesses thrive and build on Santa Ana’s strengths and opportunities.
o Policy 3.7 Facilitating Investment – Promote a solution-based customer focus in order to facilitate additional development and investment in the community.
o Policy 3.8 Comprehensive Analysis of Land Use – Pursue a balance of fiscal and qualitative community benefits when making land use decisions.

The project would be consistent with Goal EP-3 and Policies 3.7 and 3.8, as it provides for redevelopment of existing underutilized single-family residences and promotes a City Council 23 – 7 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 8 ends

new eating establishment that would provide services to the community. Moreover, the project would help create a friendly business environment and help the overall commercial center to enhance their business offerings and compete with nearby commercial centers. Lastly, by working on an improved site design with the applicant, staff ensured that that project provided a high level of community investment for residents, workers, and visitors in the area.

Public Notification and Community Outreach
Project notifications were posted, published, and mailed in accordance with City and State regulations for both the Planning Commission and the City Council public hearing.

At the time this report was printed, no issues of concern were raised regarding the proposed development.

In addition to the above noticing, the project was subject to the City’s Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS-3040) requiring two meetings to facilitate early public participation. The first community meeting was held April 21, 2022. Twelve members of the community attended and posed questions relating to hours of operation, on-site traffic circulation, and site lighting. The second community meeting was held February 2, 2023, during which over 25 members of the community attended and posed questions related to increased traffic concerns along Santa Clara Avenue, status of traffic study, status of the existing single-family homes and proposed relocation/demolition, hours of operations, entitlement timeline and process, on-site traffic circulation, and traffic collision concerns along Santa Clara Avenue. Materials from the two required community meetings are included with this report as Exhibit 6, and all materials were published to the project’s webpage on the City’s website at www.santa-ana.org/mcdonalds-drive-through-restaurant/.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Section 21000 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code) and in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq. of the California Code of Regulations), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project and has been attached to this report as Exhibit 5. The purpose of the IS/MND is to describe the proposed project and to provide an evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with the project’s construction and operation. Moreover, the IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts of project implementation; includes significance determinations from the environmental analyses; identifies regulatory requirements to be incorporated into the project; and sets forth mitigation measures that will lessen or avoid potentially significant project impacts on the environment.

The IS/MND determined that the proposed project would have no impact, or less than significant impacts with mitigation measures, in all topics outlined in the CEQA Environmental Checklist. Possible impacts identified in the IS/MND include those City Council 23 – 8 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 9 ends

related to Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. With implementation of mitigation measures (MM) listed below, all potential impacts would be less than significant.
• MM CUL-1: Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the Applicant shall retain an Orange County-certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary.
• MM GEO-1: Prior to commencement of earthmoving activities, the Applicant shall retain a qualified Orange County-certified Paleontologist for on-call services in the event of a discovery of paleontologically sensitive rock formations during ground disturbance activities.
• MM HAZ-1: Any additional materials discovered during demolition activities shall be collected and analyzed prior to removal or disturbance of materials. • MM HAZ-2: Prior to demolition, all asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and asbestos containing construction materials (ACCMs) shall be removed from the structures at the Project site.
• MM TCR-1: Prior to commencement of ground disturbing activities, the Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor.
• MM TCR-2: Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resource Objects, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity shall cease. • MM TCR-3: Upon discovery of any human remains and associated funerary or ceremonial objects, actions pursuant to Public Resource Code 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code 7050.5 shall occur.

The IS/MND’s analysis determined that the above-mentioned environmental categories would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of the enforceable mitigation measures, that would be adopted by the City. The final Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) can be found as part of the overall environmental documents provided in Exhibit 5.

Historic or Cultural Significance
Two built environment resources over 45 years old were identified within the project site: 2101 and 2109 East Santa Clara Avenue. The properties were recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Forms in consideration of California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and local City designation criteria and integrity requirements. Both properties were found not eligible under all state and local designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit.

More specifically, what remains of both properties lacks both historical significance and integrity such that they do not meet any state or local criteria/integrity requirements for City Council 23 – 9 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 10 ends

designation. The City’s environmental consultant closely reviewed and applied criteria for evaluation, as outlined by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, as part of their significance evaluation. The evaluation was included as Appendix C in the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the project.

Their significant evaluation summarized that the Newcombs were one of many early families that arrived in the Santa Ana area in the 1870s and 1890s. The family owned a sizable tract of land and used it for agricultural purposes and built a family homestead in the 1920s nearby at the corner of what is now Tustin and Santa Clara avenues. Robert Henry Newcomb was the grandson of this early Santa Ana family, and it appears that he built the existing ranch house on the project site in circa 1957. However, from the 1950s through the early 1970s, much of Santa Ana, including Santa Clara Avenue, experienced a postwar development boom and numerous homes were constructed on what was previously agricultural land. During this period, the original family homestead from the 1920s (which best represented the Newcomb family) was demolished by 1972.

From circa 1957 to 2021, multiple Newcomb family members lived in the ranch house (2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue), including Robert Henry Newcomb. Robert owned a successful shoe store in downtown Santa Ana for approximately 60 years; the store was eventually sold in 1980. Members of the Newcomb family continued to own the ranch house from circa 1957 to 2021, when they sold the property to SRP Stater Bros, LLC, the entity that owns the adjacent commercial center to the north of the project site.

Although the Newcombs were one of the City’s early families, they were not the first family to settle in the area from the 1870s to the 1890s, and no evidence was found to suggest that the Newcomb family made any significant contribution to the history of Santa Ana or to its early agricultural industry. While Robert Newcomb had a successful business for many years, his business and his contribution to his profession were not revolutionary or impactful from a historical perspective. Additionally, the ranch house was constructed much later than the original family homestead and long after the arrival of the family in the area in 1883. Furthermore, the original setting for the ranch house is unrecognizable today as a result of significant commercial and residential development in the area that included the demolition of the Newcomb family homestead by 1972.

Given the lack of significant historical associations, lack of significant contributions to the history of the City, and a lack of integrity of setting, neither single-family structure rises to the level of significance required for designation under any State or local criteria. This includes the City of Santa Ana’s local historic preservation ordinance (Chapter 30 – Places of Historical and Architectural Significance). Specifically, the criteria for local designation into Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties “Register,” outlined in Section 30-2 (Criteria for Selection) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). Therefore, with respect to built environment resources, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact on historical resources under CEQA.

Traffic and Safety Impacts
City Council 23 – 10 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 11 ends

A Transportation Analysis was prepared for the proposed project by Urban Crossroads, dated August 16, 2023. The findings of the analysis were summarized in Section 4.17 (Transportation) of the IS/MND, and the Transportation Analysis in its entirety is included as Appendix K to the Draft IS/MND. The Transportation Analysis included a Level of Service (LOS) analysis, which is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on several factors including speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver.

Moreover, the project specific Transportation Analysis conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis to determine the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection, including at the intersection of the Driveway 1 (located along Santa Clara Avenue) and Santa Clara Avenue, and the intersection between Tustin Avenue and Driveway 2 (located along Tustin Avenue). Lastly, a Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Evaluation was prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated December 11, 2023 and included as Appendix L to the Draft IS/MND.

The Transportation Analysis addressed traffic conditions for multiple different scenarios, including existing (2022) baseline conditions, existing with Project conditions, opening year (2023) cumulative without Project conditions, opening year cumulative with Project conditions, horizon year without Project conditions (2040), and horizon year with Project conditions. A queuing analysis was performed for the left turning movements at the intersection of Tustin Avenue and Santa Clara Avenue to assess vehicle queues along the roadways and prevent dangerous intersections. In summary, the intersection left turning movements currently experience and are anticipated to experience acceptable queuing during the peak hours based on the 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows for each of the scenarios proposed above. The queuing analysis findings are presented in Appendix K to the Draft IS/MND.

As concluded by the Transportation Analysis, the addition of project traffic would not trigger the City of Santa Ana’s significance criteria, and no traffic signal is warranted for either intersection, intersection of the Driveway 1 (located along Santa Clara Avenue) and Santa Clara Avenue, and the intersection between Tustin Avenue and Driveway 2 (located along Tustin Avenue). Moreover, the Transportation Analysis performed a drive-through analysis to determine if the proposed circulation plan provided adequate on-site drive-through storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site vehicle demand. Ultimately, the drive-through analysis suggested that the project would provide stacking accommodations for approximately 16 vehicles within the drive-through, and there would be sufficient capacity to accommodate average and peak vehicle demands for the proposed project.

In 2013, the State of California signed into law Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), which changes how transportation impacts are analyzed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in order to help reduce transportation impacts. Specifically, in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas impacts and create long-term sustainability, SB 743 changed the standard for evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA from a LOS standard to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) standard. This statewide mandate went into effect July 1, City Council 23 – 11 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 12 ends

2020. In 2019, the City of Santa Ana adopted Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019), which states that several types of projects can be screened out from a VMT assessment using identified criteria, indicating that these projects have the potential to reduce VMT per service population and result in a less-than-significant transportation impacts. The City’s Guidelines list standardized screening methods for project level VMT analysis that can be used to identify when a proposed land use development project is anticipated to result in a less than significant impact thereby eliminating the need to conduct a full VMT analysis. The City of Santa Ana VMT screening types, as described within the City Guidelines, are listed below:
• Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
• Low VMT Area Screening
• Project Type Screening
A land use project need only to meet one of the above screening thresholds to result in a less than significant impact. Pursuant to the VMT Screening Evaluation prepared by Urban Crossroads, the project did not meet the threshold for TPA or Low VMT screening. However, the project was found to meet the Project Type screening criteria.

Pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019), local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. The proposed project would develop a drive-through quick serve restaurant of 3,975 square feet, which is below the 50,000 square feet project type screening threshold as identified. Therefore, the project is presumed to result in a less than significant impact for VMT, and thus no further VMT analysis was required and no mitigation measures were required. Lastly, the VMT Screening Evaluation was thoroughly peer reviewed by the City’s Traffic Engineer and the City’s CEQA consultant, both of which concluded that the VMT Screening Evaluation prepared for the project shows the project is screened out from any full VMT analysis.

Overall, the project would incorporate all recommendations provided by the Transportation Analysis. These include that the project maintain existing traffic controls and configuration at project driveways, and that on-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented agreeable with the provisions of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project site. Additionally, the applicant’s responsibility for the project’s contributions towards deficient off-site intersections is fulfilled through payment into pre-existing fee programs that would be assigned to the future construction of any future local/regional improvement needs (e.g., payment of fair share and/or fees for the applicable pre-existing fee programs/permit impact fees).

With incorporation of all recommendations provided by the Transportation Analysis, the project would not substantially increase traffic hazards or congestion. Nonetheless, the applicant has agreed to install additional traffic safety enhancements as requested by the City Engineer to ensure that traffic circulation patterns are not further impacted or City Council 23 – 12 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 13 ends

worsened, and ensure that the proposed operations will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. These include, but are not limited to, onsite traffic signage and directional pavement markings to prohibit left turns from the project’s driveway onto Santa Clara Avenue.

Public Review Process
The IS/MND’s Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024.

The NOI was also mailed out to all properties within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. The IS/MND was made available for public view at the City Hall Planning counter, Santa Ana Library in the Civic Center, and on the City website.

A total of five comment letters from one agency and four individuals were received during and immediately after the public review period. The City has reviewed all comments to determine whether any substantial new environmental issues have been raised. Moreover, the City has provided responses to all written comments, which can be found in the Responses to Comments (RTC) and MMRP document. Based on the evaluation in the IS/MND together with the comments received, the City has determined that no substantial new environmental issues have been raised that have not been adequately addressed in the IS/MND and/or in this RTC and MMRP document. All potential impacts associated with the project were found to be less than significant with incorporation of identified mitigation measures, where applicable. Therefore, the project would not result in any significant impacts and an IS/MND is the appropriate environmental document for the project in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The City’s final RTC and MMRP document is provided in Exhibit 5. As of this printing, no additional comments or communications from the public have been received on the IS/MND. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Determination, Environmental Review No. 2023-16 will be filed for this project.

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS
Jobs that would be created during construction would be short-term and would be typically filled by existing residents of the region. The project would include a maximum of twelve permanent employees working approximately three shifts per day, which would result in a maximum of 36 employees per day. As with the temporary construction workers, long-term operation employees are anticipated to be filled by existing residents of the region.

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Amendment Application Ordinance

2. Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map

3. Site Photos

4. Full Project Plans
City Council 23 – 13 4/2/2024
2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Avenue
April 2, 2024

Page 14 ends

5. Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)

6. Sunshine Ordinance Meetings Documents

7. Planning Commission Agenda Packet with Public Comments Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Tom Hatch, Interim City Manager
City Council 23 – 14 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 1 of 8 ends

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA ANA APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION
NO. 2024-01 AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2101 AND 2109 E. SANTA
CLARA AVENUE (APN: 396-261-26 AND 396-261-38) FROM
GENERAL AGRICULTURAL (A1) TO ARTERIAL
COMMERCIAL (C5)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:

A. Donald Ellis with Stream Realty Partners (applicant), representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (property owner) is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-01 to change the zoning designation of the properties located at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue (APN: 396-261-26 AND 396-261-38) from General Agricultural (A1) to Arterial Commercial (C5) in order to facilitate the eating establishment with a drive-through operations.

B. Chapter 41, Article I, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes that because of the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land; and regulating the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open spaces, the City is divided into land-use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulations and provide for their enforcement. The regulations are considered necessary in order to:
encourage the most appropriate use of land, conserve and stabilize property value, provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City. The City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map which has since been amended from time to time.

C. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted the General Plan Update, which went into effect on May 26, 2022. The General Plan designation for this property is General Commercial (GC).

D. The entire project as currently proposed entails a request for approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-01, to allow a restaurant with drivethrough window service.

City Council 23 – 15 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 2 of 8 ends

E. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds that the entirety of Amendment Application No. 2024-01 is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the General Plan Designation of General Commercial as well its goals and policies, as follows:
• Goal LU-2: Land Use Needs – Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana’s diverse needs
o Policy 2.2 Capture Local Spending – Encourage a range of commercial uses to capture a greater share of local spending and offer a range of employment opportunities.
o Policy 2.6 Encourage Investment – Promote rehabilitation of properties and encourage increased levels of capital
investment to create a safe and attractive environment. o Policy 2.7 Business Incubator – Support land use decisions that encourage the creation, development, and retention of business in Santa Ana
The project is consistent with Goal LU-2 and Policies 2.2, 2.6, and 2.7, as it will allow for additional service to Santa Ana residents and visitors, thereby positively contributing to the economic viability of the area by promoting local spending, offering employment opportunities, and providing a safe workplace. In addition, the applicant is making an investment to rehabilitate the site to allow for a safe and attractive establishment by expanding the commercial center and improving the circulation throughout. Lastly, the project would also preserve the character of the existing commercial area and promotes the rehabilitation of properties by proposing to remove a blighted and underutilized land use to create a safe and attractive environment.
• Goal LU-3: Compatibility of Uses – Preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts. o Policy 3.4 Compatible Development – Ensure that the scale and massing of new development is compatible and
harmonious with the surrounding built environment.
o Policy 3.7 Attractive Environment – Promote a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.

The project is consistent with Goal LU-3 and Policies 3.4 and 3.7, as the improvements would preserve the character of the existing commercial area. The scale and massing of the new project is to be compatible with the existing commercial center, as consideration was given to scale, massing, and architecture of the project to ensure that it complements the existing buildings within the surrounding development. Moreover, the project would include aesthetically pleasing features, such as landscaping with a variety of plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and City Council 23 – 16 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 3 of 8 ends

groundcover, which would further help enhanced the viability of the commercial center, would create a harmonious environment, and would help promote a clean and safe environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.
• Goal EP-1: Job Creation and Retention – Foster a dynamic local economy that provides and create employment opportunities for all residents in the City.
o Policy 1.2 Attract Business – Promote new and retain existing job-producing businesses that provide living-wage
employment opportunities.

The project is consistent with Goal EP-1 and Policy 1.2, as the improvements would help generate additional economic growth and stability in the City by further activating underutilized parcels and helping generate property and sales tax revenue. Furthermore, the project would help create a job-producing establishment thereby providing employment opportunities to Santa Ana residents.
• Goal EP-3: Business Friendly Environment – Promote a business friendly environment where businesses thrive and build on Santa Ana’s strengths and opportunities.
o Policy 3.7 Facilitating Investment – Promote a solution-based customer focus in order to facilitate additional development and investment in the community.
o Policy 3.8 Comprehensive Analysis of Land Use – Pursue a balance of fiscal and qualitative community benefits when making land use decisions.

The project would be consistent with Goal EP-3 and Policies 3.7 and 3.8, as it provides for redevelopment of existing underutilized single-family residences and promotes a new eating establishment that would provide services to the community. Moreover, the project would help create a friendly business environment and help the overall commercial center to enhance their business offerings and compete with nearby commercial centers. Lastly, by working on an improved site design with the applicant, staff ensured that that project provided a high level of community investment for residents, workers, and visitors in the area.

F. The Applicant has demonstrated compliance with all requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance codified at Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-153, including public notification and hosting of required community meetings.

Materials resulting from the meetings were subsequently posted to the City’s webpage for the project.

G. On February 26, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2024-01.

City Council 23 – 17 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 4 of 8 ends

H. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Amendment Application No. 2024-01 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code; thus, changing the zoning district is found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare.

Section 2. The Amendment Application consists of amendments to the Zoning Map, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the analysis performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2023-16). Pursuant to the requirements of the CEQA, as amended (Section 21000 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code) and in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq. of the California Code of Regulations), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project. The purpose of the IS/MND is to describe the proposed project and to provide an evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with the project’s construction and operation. Moreover, the IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts of project implementation; includes significance determinations from the environmental analyses; identifies regulatory requirements to be incorporated into the project; and sets forth mitigation measures that will lessen or avoid potentially significant project impacts on the environment.

The IS/MND determined that the proposed project would have no impact, or less than significant impacts with mitigation measures, in all topics outlined in the CEQA Environmental Checklist. Possible impacts identified in the IS/MND include those related to Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. With implementation of mitigation measures (MM) listed below, all potential impacts would be less than significant.
• MM CUL-1: Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the Applicant shall retain an Orange County-certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary.
• MM GEO-1: Prior to commencement earthmoving activities, the Applicant shall retain a qualified Orange County-certified Paleontologist for on-call services in the event of a discovery of paleontologically sensitive rock formations during ground disturbance activities.
• MM HAZ-1: Any additional materials discovered during demolition activities shall be collected and analyzed prior to removal or disturbance of materials. • MM HAZ-2: Prior to demolition, all asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and asbestos containing construction materials (ACCMs) shall be removed from the structures at the Project site.
• MM TCR-1: Prior to commencement of ground disturbing activities, the Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor.

City Council 23 – 18 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 5 of 8 ends

• MM TCR-2: Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resource Objects, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity shall cease. • MM TCR-3: Upon discovery of any human remains and associated funerary or ceremonial objects, actions pursuant to Public Resource Code 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code 7050.5 shall occur.

Historic or Cultural Significance
Two built environment resources over 45 years old were identified within the project site:
2101 and 2109 Santa Clara Avenue. The properties were recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Forms in consideration of California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and local City designation criteria and integrity requirements. Both properties were found not eligible under all state and local designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit. No historical resources were identified within the project site as a result of this study. Therefore, with respect to built environment resources, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact on historical resources under CEQA.

Traffic Impacts
The project specific Transportation Analysis conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis to determine the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection, including at the intersection of the Driveway 1 (located along Santa Clara Avenue) and Santa Clara Avenue, and the intersection between Tustin Avenue and Driveway 2 (located along Tustin Avenue).

As concluded by the Transportation Analysis, the addition of project traffic would not trigger the City of Santa Ana’s significance criteria, and no traffic signal is warranted for either intersection. In addition, the Transportation Analysis performed a drive-through analysis to determine if the proposed circulation plan provided adequate on-site drivethrough storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site vehicle demand. Ultimately, the drive-through analysis suggested that the project would provide stacking accommodations for approximately 16 vehicles within the drive-through, and there would be sufficient capacity to accommodate average and peak vehicle demands for the proposed project.

The IS/MND’s Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024. The NOI was also mailed out to all properties within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. The IS/MND was made available for public view at the City Hall Planning counter, Santa Ana Library in the Civic Center and on the City website. As of this printing, no comments or communications from the public have been received on the IS/MND. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-16 will be filed for this City Council 23 – 19 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 6 of 8 ends

project.

Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Amendment Application No. 2024-01 changing the zoning designation of the properties located at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue (APN: 396-261-26 and 396-261-38) from General Agricultural (A1) to Arterial Commercial (C5). This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: The Request for Planning Commission Action dated February 26, 2024 and exhibits attached hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 5. An amended Sectional District Map, showing the above described changes in use district designation, is hereby approved and attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.

Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 7. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Section 8. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.

ADOPTED this day of , 2024.

Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney
By:

Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
City Council 23 – 20 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 7 of 8 ends

AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers

Date:

City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
City Council 23 – 21 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 8 of 8 ends

Exhibit A
City Council 23 – 22 4/2/2024
2/28/24, 12:23 PM .
https://apps.spatialstream.com/landvision/production/CurrentBuild/Html/printpreview.html# 1/1 AA-2024-01, McDonald's Restaurant
2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
Exhibit 2 - Vicinity and Aerial View
© 2024 Digital Map Products. All rights reserved.

Santa Ana Boundary
Zoning
500 feet
City Council 23 – 23 4/2/2024
2101 E. Santa Clara Avenue
2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02
McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue Exhibit 5 – Site Photos
City Council 23 – 24 4/2/2024

CAVCAVEVEV
CANOPY 105'
TO
DT
City Council 23 – 25 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 26 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 27 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 28 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 29 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 30 4/2/2024
EXHIBIT 10
The McDonald’s at Santa Clara Avenue Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Technical Appendices, and Response to Comments (RTC) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) may be accessed at:

Santa Ana City Hall Planning Counter, First Floor
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
or
Santa Ana Main Library
26 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
or
https://www.santa-ana.org/mcdonalds-drive-through-restaurant/ City Council 23 – 31 4/2/2024
From: Michael Gregg
To: Martin, Eric
Subject: 2101 Santa Clara Ave Sana Ana - McDonald"s - Community Meeting Notes Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 12:02:53 PM
Attachments: image002.png
Good Morning Eric,
Please find notes from the community meeting as well as a log of neighbors that have contacted us. Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else at this time.

Name Question Response
Neighbor
I would like to let your team know the flier that was mailed out was awful, and it is very hard to read this meeting address and map. Noted.

Mary Lou Babin-Branch Has the City approved the project? No, just submitted first application and plans a couple of weeks ago.

Rhonda Hain what is he target opening date? Currently targeting 4th Quarter 2023 but contingent on completion entitlement and permit approvals.

Neighbor Has there been an EIR performed on the ingress/egress of this proposal? Technical studies for CEQA have not been started yet.

Neighbor
Will you continue to notify the neighbors of updates to the proposed plans and changes? Yes, required to by the City's sunshine ordinance.

Neighbor What will be the proposed hours of the restaurant? Lobby is typically 6am – 11pm, Drive-thru is 24 hours. This is subject to change once the store is franchised.

Neighbor Is there a location that is closing in order to open this location? No, this is a new location.

Rhonda Hain will there be lighting for security in the lot? Yes, there will be adequate site lighting.

Neighbor Does the CHP have any influence to locate in this location? No, parking for apartments is in-between CHP and our site.

Liz Meade
I may have missed this information but is McDonalds replacing Del Taco or is it in another locations
Del Taco will remain, we are building new McDonald's adjacent to Del Taco where there is currently two vacant residential units.

Liz Meade So it is on Santa Clara rather that Tustin? Correct.

Neighbor
Do you think with In and Out and Chick-fil-A down the street and McDonalds and compete?
McDonald’s bases its development decisions on factors outside of the local competitors in the trade area.

We review the location itself, the population and income demographics of trade area where the new restaurant will be located at and the anticipated financial returns.

Mary Lou Babin-Branch
What is McDonalds planning to bring to the community, as a community partner not as a business?
The new store will provide jobs and tax revenue to the City. Our Franchisees are heavily involved with the community in through various charities and are always giving back to the community.

Neighbor
With a McDonald’s being just 1.5 miles from this location (17th and Santiago) is it necessary to build this one so close to the other, Although the McDonald’s at 17th/Santiago is close by, based on our research, there are enough people living in the area to allow us to open a new restaurant. In addition, the new restaurant will service customers that travel along Tustin Avenue which our restaurant on 17th is not servicing.

Neighbor
Instead of looking at this new location, did you consider the corner of Tustin and Santa Clara (South West Corner)?
The southwest corner parcel is too small to accommodate our standard restaurant building when you also include the land area needed for our drive-thru lane.

Person Contact Information Notes Action Item
Mary Lou Branch [email protected] Requested copy of the presentation.

Copy of presentation
sent.

Kim Cardoba
[email protected] or 714-547-
5771
Requested copy of the presentation. Owns the daycare across the street. Supportive but wants to see the traffic study when complete.

Copy of presentation
sent. Held 30 minute
phone call with Kim to
answer questions. Would
like to see traffic study
when it comes available.

Liesa Rego Attended the community meeting. N/A
Sean Y Attended the community meeting. N/A
Rhonda Hain Attended the community meeting. N/A
Liz Meade Attended the community meeting. N/A
Deborah Strunk 714-568-1786 Interested in moving homes as they may be historical.

Had great phone call with
her. Supportive of the
project.

Mary Falcon 714-454-6069 Supportive of the project. Supportive of the project.

Michelle Almazan 714-925-5880 Wasn’t able to get onto meeting.

Multiple attempts to
contact made.

Emily Mandrup 818-9195336 Supportive of the project. Willing to come out and speak in favor. Supportive of the project.

Patrica Creame Not supportive of the project. Sees traffic being the major issue. N/A Lance Rego [email protected] Very supportive of the project. Supportive of the project.

Michael Gregg
Director of Construction and Entitlements
DEVELOPING OUTSIDE THE BOX®
3161 Michelson Drive | Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92612
Phone 805-215-6453
[email protected]
www.streamrealty.com
City Council 23 – 32 4/2/2024
A new 3,975 square foot McDonald’s
restaurant with a drive-through located at
2101 Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana.

The development will include parking, trash
enclosure, paving and landscaping for the
associated restaurant. Access will be provided
from Santa Clara Avenue, along with reciprocal
access to the retail center adjacent via drive aisles
on the north and east.

Contact Applicant For Language Interpretation Services
Stream Realty Partners
Cordially Invites You to a
Community Information Meeting:

Thursday, April 21st at 5:15 p.m.

Virtual Meeting
https://msteams.link/IH1Z
Location of
Subject Property
Michael Gregg
[email protected]
909.601.3337
City Council 23 – 33 4/2/2024
Un nuevo restaurante McDonald’s de 3,975
pies cuadrados con un drive-through ubicado
en Avenida Santa Clara 2101, Santa Ana.

El desarrollo incluirá estacionamiento, cerramiento
de basura, pavimentación y paisajismo para el
restaurante asociado. El acceso se proporcionará
desde Santa Clara Avenue, junto con el acceso
recíproco al centro minorista adyacente a través
de los pasillos de acceso al norte y al este.

Stream Realty Partners
Cordialmente los invita a un
Reunión de Información Comunitaria:
jueves, abril 21 en 5:15 p.m.

Reunión virtual
https://msteams.link/IH1Z
Ubicación de
Propiedad del sujeto
Póngase en contacto con el solicitante de servicios de interpretación de idiomas Michael Gregg
[email protected]
909.601.3337
City Council 23 – 34 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 35 4/2/2024
Stream Realty Partners
www.streamrealty.com
3161 Michelson Drive Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92612
T. 949.656.7051
February 7, 2023
Pedro Gomez
City of Santa Ana, Planning Division
20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex M-20
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Re: McDonald’s Drive-Through Restaurant, 2101 and 2109 East Santa Clara Street, DP No. 2022-06R, 2nd Community Meeting (Sunshine Ordinance)
Dear Pedro,
Per the requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance, please find attached the following reference items for the second community meeting held on February 2nd, 2023.

1. Mailer labels & 1,000-foot radius map

2. Community meeting flyer (English & Spanish)
a. Mailed January 23, 2023 to the property owners and occupants

3. Newspaper notice
a. Affidavit/Proof of Publication of the meeting notice on both January 23rd, 2023 and January 26th, 2023 by the Orange County Register
b. Photo of Notice

4. Scanned attendee sign-in sheet
a. Names and emails of meeting attendees (all attendees were urged to sign-in but all did not)

5. Meeting minutes

6. Displayed exhibits
I confirm, under penalty of perjury, that Stream Realty Partners conducted the above referenced community meeting, as required by the Sunshine Ordinance. These items are being submitted within four business days.

Thank You,
Donald Ellis
Senior Vice President
Stream Realty Partners
City Council 23 – 36 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 37 4/2/2024
APN NAME Address CITY ST ZIP
396-261-26 SRP/STATER BROS LLC 3161 MICHELSON DR #100 IRVINE CA 92612 396-261-26 OCCUPANT 2101 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-38 SRP STATER BROS LLC 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-02 MICHAEL ANTHONY JONES 1905 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-03 MARK DAVID SMITH 1909 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-04 DAVID HAGLUND 1913 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-05 DIETRICH KANZLER/VIRGINIA TA 1917 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-06 MARK & STEPHANIE MCCALLIE 1918 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-07 SYDNEY F CHANDLER 1914 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-08 PATRICIA MARIE HEALY 1910 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-09 ROGER C WADELL 1906 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-13 CARLOS CORTES-ROVIRA/BEATRIZ MACEIRA 12392 RANCHVIEW DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-13 OCCUPANT 1909 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-14 MARTHA W WORRALL 1913 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-15 JAMES R & DONNA L CRAMSIE 1917 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-16 NANCY CAROL JACK 955 W 19TH ST #D123 COSTA MESA CA 92627 396-041-16 OCCUPANT 1918 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-17 LAWRENCE ONTIVEROS 1914 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-29 JOSE ERNESTO MENDOZA GUTIERREZ 2113 N MILLWOOD ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-30 PERRY E ELKINS 2109 MILLWOOD ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-30 OCCUPANT 2109 MILLWOOD ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-37 CITY OF SANT A ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA SANTA ANA CA 92701 396-102-01 STEPHEN C CALHOUN 2424 CHELSEA RD PALOS VERDE ESTATES CA 90274 396-102-01 OCCUPANT 2125 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-02 CARLOS & JULIANNA ALCAZAR 2121 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-03 RUTH MARIE BABESHOFF 2117 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-04 BEVERLY ANN MAYO 2113 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-05 FELIX DE LA RIVA 2109 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-06 JAMES F HOWARD 2105 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-07 DELIA L MOSBACK 2101 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-08 SHERRY J SCHWANKE 2017 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-09 EMILY C MANDRUP 2013 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-10 REACH RYANS 13 AUGUSTA COTA DE CAZA CA 92679 396-102-10 OCCUPANT 2009 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-11 MARK R HANNAH 2005 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-12 LYNDSEY & JASON UPCRAFT 2001 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-01 MAURO & LINDA TAPIA 2126 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-02 LAIZA ROCHA OLIVEIRA 2122 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-03 STEPHEN D BOWERS 13422 DAWN AVE GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 396-104-03 OCCUPANT 2118 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-04 MARGARET R LEHMAN 2114 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-05 CATHERINE A/LESLIE DOUGLAS 2110 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-06 KRISTIN SERNA 2106 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 RYAN WILLIAM/PAULA JEAN GRIFFIN 2919 PAPER LN NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE R2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE Rl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE Q SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE L SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE K SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE J SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE I SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 38 4/2/2024
396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE L SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE K SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE J SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE I SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-02 DOROTHY M HACKETHAL 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-02 RESIDENT 2410 PON DEROSA ST APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-02 RESIDENT 2410 PON DEROSA ST APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-02 RESIDENT 2410 PON DEROSA ST APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-02 RESIDENT 2410 PON DEROSA ST APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-03 HGC PROPERTIES 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-03 RESIDENT 2414 PON DEROSA ST APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-03 RESIDENT 2414 PON DEROSA ST APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-03 RESIDENT 2414 PON DEROSA ST APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-03 RESIDENT 2414 PON DEROSA ST APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-04 TUAN SI TRAN 1151 DRAYTON WAY TUSTIN CA 92780 396-131-04 RESIDENT 2418 PON DEROSA ST APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-04 RESIDENT 2418 PON DEROSA ST APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-04 RESIDENT 2418 PON DEROSA ST APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-04 RESIDENT 2418 PON DEROSA ST APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-23 DOROTHY M HACKETHAL 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-23 RESIDENT 2229 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-23 RESIDENT 2229 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-23 RESIDENT 2229 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-23 RESIDENT 2229 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-24 HGC PROPERTIES 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-24 RESIDENT 2228 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-24 RESIDENT 2228 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-24 RESIDENT 2228 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-24 RESIDENT 2228 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-25 VIRGINIA G CARLYLE 14 GOLD BLF IRVINE CA 92604 396-131-25 RESIDENT 2224 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-25 RESIDENT 2224 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-25 RESIDENT 2224 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-25 RESIDENT 2224 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-26 DOROTHY M HACKETHAL 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-26 RESIDENT 2220 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-26 RESIDENT 2220 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 39 4/2/2024
396-131-26 RESIDENT 2220 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-26 RESIDENT 2220 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-27 RON & CHRIS RENTALS 25392 DERBYHILL DR LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 396-131-27 OCCUPANT 2429 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-46 HAVAPART LLC PO BOX 30000 JACKSON WY 83002
396-131-46 RESIDENT 2236 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-46 RESIDENT 2236 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-46 RESIDENT 2236 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-46 RESIDENT 2236 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-47 HGC PROPERTIES 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-47 RESIDENT 2232 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-47 RESIDENT 2232 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-47 RESIDENT 2232 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-47 RESIDENT 2232 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-01 LIESE L REGO 18262 OAK RIDGE DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-01 OCCUPANT 2301 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-07 LONG RIDGE ASSOCIATES 18262 OAK RIDGE DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-07 OCCUPANT 2151 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 LENNOX INVEST 5855 E CARSON ST LAKEWOOD CA 90713 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2401 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2403 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2405 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2407 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2409 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2411 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2413 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2415 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2417 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2419 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2421 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2423 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2425 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2425 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2425 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2425 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2427 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2427 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2427 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2427 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 APPLEWOOD FOXBOROUGH 485 ALBERTO WAY# 200 LOS GATOS CA 95032 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2201 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2201 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2201 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2203 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2203 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 9270S 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2203 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2203 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 40 4/2/2024
396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2211 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2211 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2211 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2211 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2213 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2213 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2213 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2213 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2223 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 41 4/2/2024
396-141-12 RESIDENT 2223 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2223 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2223 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2224 E SANT A CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2231 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2231 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2231 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2231 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2235 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2235 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2235 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2235 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2239 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2239 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2239 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2239 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 42 4/2/2024
396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 OCCUPANT 2243 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-13 WILLIAM A WOODWARD 2343 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 WILLIAM JESS NORWOOD 2323 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE I SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STEM SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE J SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE K SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE L SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STEN SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-20 CHURCH ST JOHNS LUTHERANOF ORANGE 154 S SHAFFER ST ORANGE CA 92866 396-261-21 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 601 N 7TH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 396-261-21 OCCUPANT 2031 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-26 OCCUPANT 2101 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-30 OCCUPANT 2360 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-31 WILLIAM H HASENJAEGER 1602 CAROLINA ST# D3 BELLINGHAM WA 98229 396-261-32 WILLIAM H HASENJAEGER 1602 CAROLINA ST# D3 BELLINGHAM WA 98229 396-261-33 JOHN O HASENJAEGER 4620 NE DAVIS ST PORTLAND OR 97213 396-261-33 OCCUPANT 2360 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 SRP STATER BROS LLC 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2370 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2370 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2370 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2370 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2390 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2390 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-35 SRP STATER BROS LLC 62 FISHER CREEK DR RIDGEWAY co 81432 396-261-36 DEVLING PLACE APARTMENTS 445 SANTIAGO AVE LONG BEACH CA 90814 396-261-36 OCCUPANT 2300 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-37 SRP STATER BROS LLC 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 43 4/2/2024
396-261-38 SRP ST ATER BROS LLC 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-49 ORANGE COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT 25751 TRABUCO RD EL TORO CA 92630 396-261-49 OCCUPANT 1919 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-50 ORANGE COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT 25751 TRABUCO RD EL TORO CA 92630 396-261-50 OCCUPANT 1919 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 TUSTIN AVENUE APARTMENTS LLC 26 CORPORATE PARK DR# 200 IRVINE CA 92602 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT JS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Kl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT KS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT KlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Kll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-SS RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT KlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT LS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT LS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ml SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT MS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT MS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Nl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT NS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 44 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT NS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Nl0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Nll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 01 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 02 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 03 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 04 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 05 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 06 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 07 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 08 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 09 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 010 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 011 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 012 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Pl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT PS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT PS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APTPlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT PlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ql SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT QS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Rl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT RS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT RS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT RlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 45 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT RlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT AS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT AS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT BS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT BS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT CS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT CS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Cl0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Cll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT DS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT DS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT DlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Dll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT El SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT ES SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 46 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT ES SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT FS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Gl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT GS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT GS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT GlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Gll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Hl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT HS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT HS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Hl0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Hll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT HlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 OCCUPANT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE OFC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 47 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT AS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT AS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Al0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT All SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT BS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT BS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Bl0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Bll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT CS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT El SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT ES SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT FS SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 48 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT FlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Fll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT FlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Gl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT GS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT GlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Gll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Hl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT HS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT JS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Kl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 49 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Kll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KB SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Lll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LB SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ml SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT MS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT MS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Nl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT NS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT NS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 01 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 02 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 03 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 04 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 05 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 06 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 07 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 08 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Pl SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 50 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT PS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT PS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ql SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT QS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ql0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Qll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Rl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT RS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT RS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Rll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 51 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 52 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 53 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 54 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 55 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT S6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT S7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT S8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT S9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Tl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT TS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT TS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-02 JISU YOUM 2220 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-03 KEVIN & CRYSTAL JAMIESON 2216 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-04 CHRISTOPHER MELAD/CYNTHIA NGUYEN 2212 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 51 4/2/2024
396-281-05 JOHN VANDERHOEK/IVONNE LANDEROS 2208 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-06 CHARLES WESLEY SUTHERLAND 2204 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-07 DANA M DIETZ 2200 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-08 MICHELLE LOUISE ROJAS-ALMAZAN 2126 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-18 ANGELA FROEHLICH/RONALD JOSEPH BURKARD 2224 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-25 HERBERT STEELE JRTR BOWDEN 18132 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-25 RESIDENT 2230 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-25 RESIDENT 2232 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-26 JAMES C & GUADALUPE F LOPEZ 2228 N PON DEROSA STA SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-26 RESIDENT 2226 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-26 RESIDENT 2228 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-27 WESTERN SEQUOIA HOLDINGS LLC 9910 CAM ROSE CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-281-27 RESIDENT 2222 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-27 RESIDENT 2224 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-28 TOMY J MAKIL 1614 E CHESTNUT AVE ORANGE CA 92867 396-281-28 RESIDENT 2201 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-28 RESIDENT 2203 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-29 VALDEZ DANE ANDRE & EMILY MARY 2204 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-29 RESIDENT 2202 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-30 NAZANIN FARHAD 2800 KELLER DR# 57 TUSTIN CA 92782 396-281-30 RESIDENT 2206 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-30 RESIDENT 2204 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-31 STEPHEN FEAR 1626 CHESTNUT ST# 8 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 396-281-31 RESIDENT 2208 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-31 RESIDENT 2210 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-31 RESIDENT 2212 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-32 MARGIE M ALCARAZ 18641 E AUBURN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-32 RESIDENT 2213 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-33 CHRISTOPHER T & JANAE BRANNEN 2209 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-34 NANCY CAROL JACK 955 W 19TH ST #D123 COSTA MESA CA 92627 396-281-34 OCCUPANT 2205 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-35 MICHAEL J & MAUREEN P MOSS 6570 E FORDHAM CIR ANAHEIM CA 92807 396-281-35 RESIDENT 2201 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-35 RESIDENT 2203 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-36 NORMA NODAL DUENAS 229 E COMMONWEALTH AVE# 236 FULLERTON CA 92832 396-281-36 RESIDENT 2202 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-36 RESIDENT 2204 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-37 MARIE J URIBE 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-281-37 RESIDENT 2206 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-37 RESIDENT 2208 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-38 JORGE RICARDO BARTLETT 21404 STANWELL ST CHATSWORTH CA 91311 396-281-38 OCCUPANT 2210 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-38 RESIDENT 2212 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-39 TIMOTHY R HARRIS 2214 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-39 RESIDENT 2216 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-40 LUCATERO IGNACIO & MARIA TRINIDAD 2218 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-41 MARTIN & SYLVIA CAZAREZ PO BOX 10441 SANTA ANA CA 92711 396-281-41 RESIDENT 2220 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-41 RESIDENT 2201 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-41 RESIDENT 2203 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-42 WESTERN SEQUOIA HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 9863 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92728 396-281-42 RESIDENT 2207 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 52 4/2/2024
396-281-42 RESIDENT 2209 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-43 ROBERT L SHANNON PO BOX4455 ORANGE CA 92863
396-281-43 RESIDENT 2209 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-43 RESIDENT 2211 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-44 JENNIFER DIANE ESSER PO BOX 656 TUSTIN CA 92781 396-281-44 RESIDENT 2213 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-44 RESIDENT 2215 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-45 SIYAMAC & FA THEME RASTAWAN 2217 N PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-45 RESIDENT 2217 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-45 RESIDENT 2219 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-46 ANGELICA MEJIA 1744 W CATHERINE DR ANAHEIM CA 92801 396-281-46 RESIDENT 2221 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-46 RESIDENT 2223 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-47 CLAY M MICHAEL MC 8334 E CANDLEBERRY ORANGE CA 92869 396-281-47 RESIDENT 2225 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-47 RESIDENT 2227 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-48 CHAE HAK YI 20 DELAWARE IRVINE CA 92620
396-281-48 RESIDENT 2229 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-48 RESIDENT 2231 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-49 CKL PROP LLC 20640 MIRKWOOD RUN YORBA LINDA CA 92886 396-281-49 OCCUPANT 2231 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-50 FRAZEE TUSTIN PROPERTIES 1005 ROSECRANS ST# 202 SAN DIEGO CA 92106 396-281-50 OCCUPANT 2201 N TUSTIN AVE STE 100 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-50 OCCUPANT 2201 N TUSTIN AVE STE 110 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-50 OCCUPANT 2201 N TUSTIN AVE STE 120 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY 2101 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 OCCUPANT 2121 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 OCCUPANT 2231 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 OCCUPANT 2235 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 OCCUPANT 2239 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-291-07 SANTAANA EXPRESS CAR WASH LLC 3300 WINDY RIDGE PKWY SE UN #1019ATLANTA GA 30339 396-291-07 OCCUPANT 2035 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-292-01 LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY 2101 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-292-02 PETER GEORGE EPPELODAUER EPPELDAUER 67 DOMANI IRVINE CA 92618 396-292-02 OCCUPANT 2233 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-331-01 MONTREH LLC 2355 PIEPER LN TUSTIN CA 92782
396-331-01 OCCUPANT 2102 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 RICHMAN HOLDINGS LLC 2090 N TUSTIN AVE 200 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2080 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2080 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 100 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 140 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 150 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 160 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 200 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 240 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 250 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 CADIGAN SANTA CLARA LP 440 W 1ST ST# 201 TUSTIN CA 92780 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 53 4/2/2024
396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT 14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT 19 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 20 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 21 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 22 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 23 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 24 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 25 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 26 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 27 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 28 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 29 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 30 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 31 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 32 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 33 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 34 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 35 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 36 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 37 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 38 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 39 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 40 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 41 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 42 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 43 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 44 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 45 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 46 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 47 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 48 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 49 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 50 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 51 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 52 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 2002 E SANTA CLARA LP 500 NEWPORT CENTER DR# 200 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 396-341-02 OCCUPANT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT L1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT L2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 54 4/2/2024
396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT L3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT L4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT K2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Kl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT J2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT J1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT El SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Gl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Hl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Ql SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Q2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Q3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Q4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT N4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT P4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT P3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT P2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Pl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Nl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT N2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT N3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT M4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT M3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT M2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Ml SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 OCCUPANT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 55 4/2/2024
396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 19 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 20 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 21 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 22 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 23 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 24 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 25 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 26 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 27 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 28 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 29 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 30 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 31 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 32 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 33 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 34 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 35 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 36 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 37 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 38 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 39 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 40 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 41 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 42 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 43 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 44 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 45 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 46 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 47 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 48 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-05 PURVIS ENTERPRISES LLC 3 JADE CV CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 396-341-05 OCCUPANT 2112 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-06 HEINECKE GOULD PROPERTIES LLC 47 MARBELLA SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 396-341-06 OCCUPANT 2230 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 HEINECKE GOULD PROPERTIES LLC 47 MARBELLA SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 City Council 23 – 56 4/2/2024
396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2130 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2106 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2110 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2112 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2114 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2116 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2118 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2120 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2122 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2124 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2126 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2128 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2128 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2130 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2132 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2134 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2136 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2138 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2140 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2142 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2150 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2156 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-08 HEINECKE GOULD PROPERTIES LLC 47 MARBELLA SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 396-341-08 OCCUPANT 2106 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-001 THOM GSELL 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-002 GARCIA ANGIE L / VELOZ MARIA L 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-003 SHARON L VELCI 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-004 CHARLES B & SUZANNE HARRISON/ HARRISON SUZANNE2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-005 NGA TRAN 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-006 ROBERT E CHANEY 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-007 MAUREEN T BAYLEY 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-008 DAVID L DENNY/ SUAREZ, MARIA CARMEN 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-009 HORIZONS VISTA 3030 MADEIRA AVE COSTA MESA CA 92626 932-68-009 OCCUPANT 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-010 ALEXANDER GARCIA 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-011 RUTH MARIE MARCOLY 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-012 ALEJANDRO ABDI EL LOPEZ VEGA/ LOPEZ, FERNANDA 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-013 EUSEBIO SANTANA GARCIA/ BENITEZ, ARELI SALGADO 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-014 JAIME D MONGE/ DE MONGE, MARTHA E HERNANDEZ 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-015 LORRAINE C MC LAUGHLIN 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-016 LAWRENCE BLAIR BODY 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# El SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-017 VIVIANA GUTERREZ/ LEWIS AMIR R 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-018 ALICIA SABILLON 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-019 YESENIA BAHENA OCAMPO 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-020 BARBARA L SHOEMAKER 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-021 NAYELI N CARLIN MERCADO/ COLINDRES, PEDRO A DIAZ2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-022 MARY & ROMAN FALCON 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-023 DORIS K COTR IDBAYEH / IDBAYEH FREDDY COTR 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Nl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-024 ARTHUR MICHAEL RICHMAN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# N2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-025 RHONDA MARIE HAIN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# N3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-026 ROBIN E MORGAN 3148 PINEY CREEK RD WILLIAMSBURG PA 16693 932-68-026 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# M3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 57 4/2/2024
932-68-027 GEORGE A MATICS 12341 RED HILL AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-027 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# M2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-028 JERI KENNISON 5951 LAGUNA VILLA WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 932-68-028 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Ml SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-029 ALYCE L READ 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# L1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-030 ANDRES CORONA/ MONGE, SASHA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# L2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-031 HASSAN TA TIANA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# L3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-032 MICHELLE DELGADO 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-033 VICTOR M CUETO 12912 VILLA ROSE DR SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-033 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F3 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-034 DANIEL RIVERA 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F2 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-035 VICTOR REYNAFARJE 331 AVENI DA SEVILLA# A LAGUNA WOODS CA 92637 932-68-035 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-036 AMY AZPEITIA / CERA JESUS ANTONIO LOPEZ 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-037 DAVID MIN-WOO OH 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-038 ELAINE ELVA MAES 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-039 ALEXANDER N KEMP 42580 MARACAY PL BERMUDA DUNES CA 92203 932-68-039 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# El SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-040 DEBRA L FREDERICKSON 1433 SANTIAGO DR NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 932-68-040 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-041 MARTINEZ DARLING & MARIA DE LOURDES 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-042 VICTOR REYNAFARJE 331 AVENI DA SEVILLA# A LAGUNA WOODS CA 92637 932-68-042 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-043 VICTORIA CHEN RUTLEDGE 13751 BELLE RIVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-043 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-044 ALBERTO LOZANO RODRIGUEZ/ LOZANO, SONIA A 2026 E SANT A CLARA AVE C4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-045 RONALD E MCCAIN PO BOX 11244 SANTA ANA CA 92711 932-68-045 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C3 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-046 GUSTAVO E ARANDA 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C2 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-047 MARISELA MONTOYA 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-048 JOSE GUADALUPE DIAZ/ SANTOS, CONSUELO MENDOZA2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-049 LEOLA LORD 13552 MALENA DR TUSTIN CA 92780
932-68-049 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-050 JESSICA & ARTURO SEPULVEDA 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-051 PETRA PETRY 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-052 ANN A EDWARDS 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-053 JOSHUA & ALEXIS SCHNOOR 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-054 JERRY MEISTER 6522 ALEXANDRA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 932-68-054 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-055 VICTORIA CHEN RUTLEDGE 13751 BELLE RIVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-055 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-056 RICHARD C THOMPSON PO BOX 3244 ORANGE CA 92857 932-68-056 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-057 YOLANDA CARDENAS 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-0S8 FRANK M WARD 2725 S POPLAR ST SANTA ANA CA 92704 932-68-058 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-059 ALICIA ORDAZ 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-060 ANN A EDWARDS 2030 E SANT A CLARA AVE # B4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-061 TUMAN G DOYLE 709 1ST STREET WOODLAND CA 95695 932-68-061 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-062 LEE NAKAMURA 18781 PINTO LN SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-062 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# 82 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 58 4/2/2024
932-68-063 LEOLA LORD 13552 MALENA DR TUSTIN CA 92780
932-68-063 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-064 ROBERT J & JELDENA L VAVRA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-065 LARRY JOE WARD 1145 E CHALYNN AVE ORANGE CA 92866 932-68-065 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-066 DENNIS C FORSYTH 448 EL CAMINO DEL MAR LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 932-68-066 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-067 HARRY E & ANN L SEXTON 726 KENDALL DR LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 932-68-067 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-068 JOHN D ISORENA TEDDY 2030 LAST SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-069 CARIDAD CASATE 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-070 DONNA M TURNER 444 N SHAFFER ST ORANGE CA 92866 932-68-070 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# El SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-071 JOSEPHINE STATON 66 PARSON BROWN IRVINE CA 92618 932-68-071 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-072 MICHELLE NGOC MAI THAI 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-073 LONGORIA OLIVIA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-074 WALSH RICHARD JOHN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-075 GONZALO & CELINA FLORES 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-076 LEE WALSHE 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Gl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-077 NANCY MEJIA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# G2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-078 MAGDALENA S MACIAS 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# G3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-079 DAWN RASHER 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Kl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-080 SAMUAL WAYNE HAGERMAN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# K2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-081 ROJAS RYAN/ ROJAS JOHANNA N 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# K3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-082 LAURA V ORTIZ 13211 RAINBOW ST GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 932-68-082 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# J3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-083 GAYLE A STEWART 815 E PARK LN SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-083 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# J2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-084 CARLOS RIVAS/ HERNANDEZ, ISABELLE CRISTINA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# J1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-085 GEORGE & ANDROMACHI KYRIAKIDIS 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Hl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-086 FRANCISCA & RUBEN I BARRA/ I BARRA RUBEN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# H2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-087 DANILO MARQUEZ BAQUING 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# H3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-001 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-001 OCCUPANT 2616 N TUSTIN AVE# 1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-002 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / PALM ROTH, KATHY2616 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-003 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-003 OCCUPANT 2616 N TUSTIN AVE# 3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-004 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC EAST TOWER IRVINE CA 92614 933-92-004 OCCUPANT 2616 N TUSTIN AVE# 4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-005 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2525 ROMANY RD SACRAMENTO CA 95814 933-92-005 OCCUPANT 2616 N TUSTIN AVE# 5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-006 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-006 OCCUPANT 2608 N TUSTIN AVE# 6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-007 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / EBERLE, JOHN G 7912 COLONIAL CT PLEASANTON CA 94588 933-92-007 OCCUPANT 2608 N TUSTIN AVE# 7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-008 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-008 OCCUPANT 2608 N TUSTIN AVE# 8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-009 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / CONTRERAS, OLGA2608 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-010 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-010 OCCUPANT 2600 N TUSTIN AVE# 10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-011 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 City Council 23 – 59 4/2/2024
933-92-011 OCCUPANT 2600 N TUSTIN AVE# 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-012 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / QUEST MANAGEMENT LLC PO BOX 5284 ORANGE CA 92863 933-92-012 OCCUPANT 2600 N TUSTIN AVE# 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-013 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-013 OCCUPANT 2600 N TUSTIN AVE# 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-014 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LUONG, NHUT HONG2600 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-015 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-015 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-016 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-016 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-017 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / FEDERAL HOME LOAN350 HIGHLAND DR LEWISVILLE TX 75067 933-92-017 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-018 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-018 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-019 ENTERPRISES LLC PUMA PO BOX 11623 SANTA ANA CA 92711 933-92-019 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 19 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-020 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / HERNANDEZ, JUAN BARAJAS 2602 N TUSTIN AVE# 20 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-021 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / AGUILAR, NORMA EDITH 2100 E KATELLA AVE# 455 ANAHEIM CA 92806 933-92-021 OCCUPANT 2602 N TUSTIN AVE# 21 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-022 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2602 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-023 INEKKE IWAN 11 HALF MOON BAY DR CORONA DELMAR CA 92625 933-92-023 OCCUPANT 2602 N TUSTIN AVE# 23 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-024 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BROWN, DIERCH LEFFERDINK 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# G SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-025 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / GOMEZ, JUAN J 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 25 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-026 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-026 OCCUPANT 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 26 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-027 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-027 OCCUPANT 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 27 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-028 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 28 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-029 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 13681 NEWPORT AVE# 8 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-029 OCCUPANT 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 29 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-030 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 60409 JUNIPER LN LA QUINTA CA 92253 933-92-030 OCCUPANT 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 30 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-031 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LEE, SCOTT 1453 FOXTROTTER RD NORCO CA 92860 933-92-031 OCCUPANT 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# 31 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-032 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / RIVERA, FRANCISCO2618 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-033 LAURIE A YOH 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-034 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-034 OCCUPANT 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# 34 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-035 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / HONG, DAVID Y 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-036 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-036 OCCUPANT 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# 36 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-037 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-037 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 37 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-038 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / CHOUCAIR, TONY JOSE 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-039 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-039 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 39 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-040 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-040 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 40 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-041 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / TORRES, RENATO LARIOS 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-042 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / SEU, GEORGE Y 12592 LORALEEN ST GARDEN GROVE CA 92841 933-92-042 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 42 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 60 4/2/2024
933-92-043 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-043 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 43 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-044 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-044 OCCUPANT 2612 N TUSTIN AVE# 44 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-045 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 14231 UTRILLO DR IRVINE CA 92606 933-92-045 OCCUPANT 2612 N TUSTIN AVE# 45 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-046 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / NELSON, WANDA S2612 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-047 AARON PATRICK & ERICA ANN JOLENE FLORA/ FLORA ERICA ANN JOLENE 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-048 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / W&L INTERNATIONAL LLC 10722 ARROW ROUTE# 500 RANCHOCUCAMONGA CA 91729 933-92-048 OCCUPANT 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# 48 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-049 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, DAT 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-049 OCCUPANT 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# 49 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-050 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-051 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / MEDINA, MANUEL Ill 2301 N BAKER ST SANTA ANA CA 92706 933-92-051 OCCUPANT 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# 51 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-052 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2604 AN TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-052 OCCUPANT 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# 52 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-053 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / GARO, DENTON 624 N HAMLIN ORANGE CA 92869 933-92-053 OCCUPANT 2528 N TUSTIN AVE# 53 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-054 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / NICHOLSON, DANIEL A 333 W BROADWAY# 28 ANAHEIM CA 92815 933-92-054 OCCUPANT 2528 N TUSTIN AVE# 54 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-055 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, DAT 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-055 OCCUPANT 2528 N TUSTIN AVE# 55 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-056 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / CARGILL, JOHN WARREN TR 2528 N TUSTIN AVE# 56 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-057 JWR PROPERTYMANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-057 OCCUPANT 2520 N TUSTIN AVE# 57 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-058 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / AYALA, MARINA 2520 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-059 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BRICKHOUSE TUSTIN LLC 545 S LORETTA DR ORANGE CA 92869 933-92-059 OCCUPANT 2520 N TUSTIN AVE# 59 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-060 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-060 OCCUPANT 2520 N TUSTIN AVE# 60 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-061 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-061 OCCUPANT 2522 N TUSTIN AVE# 61 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-062 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ANDRADE, CLAUDIA S 2522 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-063 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-063 OCCUPANT 2522 N TUSTIN AVE# 63 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-064 DAVID C BROWN 10081 SUNRISE LN TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-064 OCCUPANT 2522 N TUSTIN AVE# 64 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-065 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / MIRANDA, JULIET REYTA 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# G SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-066 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 29 WHISTLING SWAN IRVINE CA 92604 933-92-066 OCCUPANT 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# 66 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-067 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-068 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-068 OCCUPANT 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# 68 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-069 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / MUFTI, HINA 1621 BRYAN AVE TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-069 OCCUPANT 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# 69 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-070 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-070 OCCUPANT 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# 70 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-071 EC INVESTMENT GROUP INC/ GUTIERREZ MAYRA L 2514 N TUSTIN AVE UN #A SANTA ANA CA 9270S 933-92-072 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-072 OCCUPANT 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# 72 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 933-92-073 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LINN, ERIC J 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 61 4/2/2024
933-92-074 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / MUFTI, HINA 1612 BRYAN TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-074 OCCUPANT 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# 74 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-075 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-075 OCCUPANT 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# 75 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-076 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ARZATE, EDWIN 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-077 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-078 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-078 OCCUPANT 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 78 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-079 SUMMER J MYERS 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 79 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-080 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-080 OCCUPANT 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 80 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-081 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / POLCE, JOHN JOSEPH13700 N FOUNTAIN HILLS BLVD# 363 COUNTAIN HILLS AZ 85268 933-92-081 OCCUPANT 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 81 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-082 LY LOAN 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-083 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BUNN, NANCY TR N BUNN 11 HALF MOON BAY DR CORONA DELMAR CA 92625 933-92-083 OCCUPANT 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 83 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-084 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-084 OCCUPANT 2516 N TUSTIN AVE# 0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-085 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-085 OCCUPANT 2516 N TUSTIN AVE# 85 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-086 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2516 N TUSTIN AVE# 86 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-087 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-087 OCCUPANT 2500 N TUSTIN AVE# 87 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-088 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-088 OCCUPANT 2500 N TUSTIN AVE# 88 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-089 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / GOLLIN, KURT E 2500 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-090 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-090 OCCUPANT 2500 N TUSTIN AVE# 90 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-091 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-091 OCCUPANT 2502 N TUSTIN AVE# 91 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-092 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2502 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-093 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / VELAZQUEZ, MATEO2502 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-094 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC /AM G INTERNATIONAL LLC 1619 W CRESCENT AVE# M76 ANAHEIM CA 92801 933-92-094 OCCUPANT 2502 N TUSTIN AVE# 94 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-095 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / KIM, BO YUN 2504 N TUSTIIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-096 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / KIM, BO YUN 2504 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 90705 933-92-097 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LERMA, ROSANA 2504 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-098 US BANK NA 3121 MICHELSON DR 500 IRVINE CA 92612 933-92-098 OCCUPANT 2504 N TUSTIN AVE# 98 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-099 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-099 OCCUPANT 2506 N TUSTIN AVE# 99 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-100 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-100 OCCUPANT 2506 N TUSTIN AVE# 100 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-101 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / JENSEN, DENISE PO BOX 58344 VERNON CA 90058 933-92-101 OCCUPANT 2506 N TUSTIN AVE# 101 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-102 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / WRIGHT, LORETTA ANNE 2506 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-103 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 19411 WORCHESTER LN HUNTINGTONBEACH CA 92646 933-92-103 OCCUPANT 2508 N TUSTIN AVE# 103 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-104 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / CARO, GEORGE RAYMOND JR 2508 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-105 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / SANTANA, MYUNG RAN 2508 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-106 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ONYX LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-106 OCCUPANT 2508 N TUSTIN AVE# 106 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 62 4/2/2024
933-92-107 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BUNN, NANCY TR N BUNN 11 HALF MOON BAY DR NEWPORT BEACH CA 92661 933-92-107 OCCUPANT 2510 N TUSTIN AVE# 107 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-108 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / KLAWITTER, BRYAN EDWARD 2510 N TUSTIN AVE# 108 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-109 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 537 S SILKTREE CIR ORANGE CA 92868 933-92-109 OCCUPANT 2510 N TUSTIN AVE# 109 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-110 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / DURAN, CARLOS VELAZQUEZ 2510 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-111 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / DOWNING, CARI LYNN2510 N TUSTIN AVE# 111 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-112 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2013 BARCLAY CT SANTA ANA CA 92701 933-92-112 OCCUPANT 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# 112 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-113 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / HOLT, RONALD 2244 E PEPPER HILL DR ORANGE CA 92867 933-92-113 OCCUPANT 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# 113 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-114 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC /MCBRIDE, MICHAEL2622 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-115 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-115 OCCUPANT 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# 115 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-116 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BRISCOE, JOHN FREDERICK 375 ATLANTIC AVE# 101 LONG BEACH CA 90802 933-92-116 OCCUPANT 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# 116 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-117 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-117 OCCUPANT 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# 117 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-118 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / WARDE, LINDA J 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA MA CA 92705 933-92-119 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LEDON, JEFFREY 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-120 GMAC MORTGAGE 3900 CAPITAL CITY BLVD LANSING Ml 48906 933-92-120 OCCUPANT 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# 120 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-121 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-121 OCCUPANT 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# 121 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-122 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / GONZALES, DIETER M2530 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-123 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA 3415 VISION DR COLUMBUS OH 43219 933-92-123 OCCUPANT 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# 123 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-124 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / STA ANA, LANIE SALVIEJO 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-125 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-125 OCCUPANT 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# 125 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-126 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-126 OCCUPANT 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# 126 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-127 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON PO BOX 619079 DALLAS TX 75261 933-92-127 OCCUPANT 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# 127 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-128 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# F SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-129 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-129 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# 129 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-130 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-130 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# 130 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-131 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-131 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# 131 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-132 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-132 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# 132 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-133 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BROWN, RANDALL C2614 E N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-133 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-134 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ALLISON, CLAY W 2722 N LYON ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-134 OCCUPANT 2626 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-135 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-135 OCCUPANT 2626 N TUSTIN AVE# 135 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-136 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / AHMAD, ANDREW 2626 C N TUSTIN AVE# 136 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-137 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 27181 VALLEYMONT RD LAKE FOREST CA 92630 933-92-137 OCCUPANT 2626 N TUSTIN AVE# 137 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 63 4/2/2024
933-92-138 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-138 OCCUPANT 2626 N TUSTIN AVE# 138 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-139 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-139 OCCUPANT 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# 139 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-140 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ZUNIGA, ALFREDO CEJA 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-141 VERA C ROHRS 17602 17TH ST# 211 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-141 OCCUPANT 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-142 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / SALGADO, HODETH PINEDA 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-143 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LEULUAI, ALLEN 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-144 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-144 OCCUPANT 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# 144 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-145 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LICATA, CYNTHIA MTR 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# F SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-146 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC /MCBRIDE, MICHAEL DBA MC 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-147 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-148 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2300 S LEWIS ST# 7 ANAHEIM CA 92802 933-92-148 OCCUPANT 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# 148 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-149 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / RUIZ, KRISTY L 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-150 RAMIREZ EVA FLORES 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-151 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 City Council 23 – 64 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 65 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 66 4/2/2024

SUBJECT SITE
(SITIO DE ASUNTO) Stream Realty Partners
cordially invites you to a
Community Information Meeting.

Thursday, February 2nd
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
2370 N. Tustin Ave., Suite D,
Santa Ana, CA 92705 (Former King Superstore)
A new 3,975 square foot McDonald’s restaurant
with a drive-through located at
2101 Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, CA
The development will include parking, trash enclosure, paving and landscaping for the associated restaurant. Access will be provided from Santa Clara Avenue, along with reciprocal access to the retail center adjacent via drive aisles on the north and east.

Contact applicant for language interpretation services.

Donald Ellis
[email protected]
949.656.7051 City Council
Lic. 01876466
23 – 67 4/2/2024
SITIO DE ASUNTO Stream Realty Partners
cordialmente los invita a un
reunión de información
comunitaria.

Jueves 2 de febrero
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
2370 N. Tustin Ave., Suite D,
Santa Ana, CA 92705 (Antiguo King Superstore)
Un nuevo restaurante McDonald’s de 3,975 pies
cuadrados con un drive-through ubicado en
2101 Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, CA
El desarrollo incluirá estacionamiento, cerramiento
de basura, pavimentación y paisajismo para el restaurante asociado. El acceso se proporcionará desde Santa Clara
Avenue, junto con el acceso recíproco al centro
minorista adyacente a través de los pasillos de acceso
al norte y al este.

Póngase en contacto con el solicitante para
los servicios de interpretación de idiomas.

Donald Ellis
[email protected]
949.656.7051
Lic. 01876466
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92612
City Council 23 – 68 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 69 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 70 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 71 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 72 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 73 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 74 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 75 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 76 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 77 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 78 4/2/2024
Meeting Minutes
McDonald’s Development Project | 2101 Santa Clara Avenue 02/02/2023 Sunshine Ordinance Community Meeting #2
Purpose:

Stream Realty Partners presenting on a new proposed 3,975 square foot McDonald’s restaurant with a drive-through to be located at 2101 Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, CA.

Time:
6pm – 8pm
Location:
2370 N. Tustin Ave., Suite D, Santa Ana, CA 92705 (Former King Superstore) The Community Information Meeting was scheduled to begin at 6pm. Community members began filing into the meeting space at approximately 5:50pm. The presentation of the proposed development of the McDonald’s began at roughly 6pm. Balloons were placed outside of the meeting location to provide a visual indicator for visitors. Visitors were asked to sign in. Refreshments were provided. There were approximately 25-30 attendees from the local community.

Primary Speakers and Main Presenters during the meeting included:

Donald Ellis and Martin Pupil, Stream Realty Partners (primary applicant/owners of the shopping center) Christine Cho and Chris Stamps, McDonald’s
Jessica Steiner, Bickel and Associates (architectural firm) City of Santa Ana attending staff:

Pedro Gomez, Planning Department
Frank Bejarano, Neighborhood Initiatives
Overview:

Stream Realty Partners presented its overall vision/revitalization plan for the shopping center which includes the development of a proposed McDonalds (Phase 1) and the remodel and cleanup of the shopping center (Phase 2). The formal presentation ended around 6:38pm and an open discussion/conversation with residents lasted until approximately 7:10pm. After that, residents were encouraged to directly interact with exhibits and ask the project team questions. The below summary reflects primary questions and comments from residents as well as answers from the project team, this is not a word-for-word transcript of the meeting. Stream Realty Partners ensured, multiple times, that attending residents received business cards. Attendees were urged to reach out to the project team to further discuss the project, a few did just that in the days following the meeting.

Summary of questions and concerns:
• Will McDonald’s increase traffic along Santa Clara?
This will be identified in a traffic study which is required as part of the submittal process to the City of Santa Ana.
• Is the traffic study available to be viewed by the public? City Council 23 – 79 4/2/2024
The traffic study is part of the submittal process to the City of Santa Ana and will eventually be accessible by the public.
• Where are we in the process? Is this project approved? No, an application has been submitted and will continue to be worked through in collaboration with City of Santa Ana staff. Then, the project will next go to a Planning Commission meeting. • Is McDonald’s going to relocate the homes which are currently in the proposed location? No, the homes are to be demolished.
• Does the current homeowner(s) know of these proposed plans? Stream Realty Partners are the current owners of the two homes located on the project site. The former homeowner is deceased and next of kin, one daughter and son do not reside in the State of California. A third daughter is a local resident. Next of kin directly participated with the sale of the property to Stream Realty Partners.
• What are the proposed hours of the restaurant?
Hours are dependent on the allowable/preferred hours as determined by the City of Santa Ana. • Does the restaurant require a CUP?
Yes.
• What is a CUP?
Conditional Use Permit where the City of Santa Ana outlines conditions of use for operation. • Santa Clara turns from two lanes into one lane, if this restaurant would be built, would McDonald’s address this lane merger on Santa Clara?
No, that is not within the McDonald’s project purview though off-site improvements may be required by the City of Santa Ana.
• Is the internal shopping center traffic flow analyzed as part of the traffic study? No, the traffic study only addresses public arteries, however, Stream Realty Partners does actively look into traffic patterns within the shopping center. • Will the entrance to the shopping center on Santa Clara be widened? Potentially, yes. A slight width increase is part of the current site plan proposal. • Can McDonald’s put a light on Tustin Ave. where visitors currently have issues exiting the shopping center into existing traffic.

No, this is not within the McDonald’s purview and is on the opposite side of the shopping center. • What will McDonald’s do to mitigate loud music from young people who may be purchasing food from the drive-thru who also may perform a U-turn near residential homes? No capability to answer this question as it relies on variables that are outside of the control of McDonald’s.
• How many jobs will this McDonald’s create?
City Council 23 – 80 4/2/2024
Roughly 40 – 50 jobs.
• Homelessness is a prevalent issue; how will McDonald’s ensure this does not become a haven for homeless individuals?
There is already an existing homeless issue at the shopping center and specifically within the existing homes which are currently vacant. Stream Realty Partners has continuously documented homelessness conducting numerous acts, such as breaking and entering, as well as attempting to live on-site where the houses currently stand. New development historically deters homeless and increased lighting and consumer activity at this proposed location will not be an attractant to homeless individuals.
• How will McDonald’s mitigate the noise concerns from visitors? The site plan was created in such a way to turn activity towards the shopping center and away from residential neighborhoods.
• Why is the site oriented the way it is?
The project team has worked for many months proactively with City of Santa Ana staff to find a site plan that is palatable, operationally feasible, and aligns with consumer needs. • What kind of technology will McDonald’s be using to alleviate line stack up in the drive-thru? McDonald’s customers on average have a 3–4-minute wait time in the drive-thru, which is significantly less than its local competitors. Mobile ordering will also be available, interactive doit-yourself menu boards will be inside, and the dual-lane drive-thru is built with multiple windows specifically to increase efficiencies.
• What time will the deliveries be made to McDonald’s and where will the delivery trucks enter and exit the site?
The delivery times for McDonald’s are yet to be determined. The times will be determined upon approval of the project working cohesively with eh City of Santa Ana to make these events positive for the community.
• Who determines if the home is “of historical significance” and when? As part of the environmental review process, the City of Santa Ana will determine if any parts of the existing homes are considered to be historically significant. If so, mitigation factors will be laid out and the project team would be happy to follow them. For now, that is something that is to be determined.
• Does this project require a zone change?
Yes, the zoning is partially agriculture and would require a zone change. • How does this zone change fall into the greater housing needs for the City of Santa Ana? Currently, the City of Santa Ana is planning to meet their RHNA allocations and City of Santa Ana staff has not determined that this particular zoning change will be an issue for meeting their Housing Element Update requirements.
• What will this project mean for the wall near Stater Bros.? This project would demise that wall and increase the line-of-sight for the entire shopping center.

City Council 23 – 81 4/2/2024
• Are there other plans to update the shopping center?
Yes, this is a small but important part of the future plans for the shopping center. New tenants, signage, and plenty of opportunities to provide community benefit.

All attendees were gone by roughly 8:15pm.

City Council 23 – 82 4/2/2024
McDonald’s Development
FEBRUARY 2023
2109 E SANTA CLARA AVENUE | SANTA ANA, CA

SITE PLAN (PLAN DE SITIO)

ADJACENT

RESTAURANT
1 STORY STUCCO BUILDING
±1,858 SF
BUILDING HEIGHT: ±16'-11"

ADJACENT RETAIL
1 STORY BRICK BUILDING
±25,587 SF
BUILDING HEIGHT: ±24'-7"

ADJACENT

RESIDENTIAL

E SANTA CLARA AVE
5 9
M.O. M.O.
105' TO DT
CANOPY
12 PATIO
6 McDONALD'S
(4587
PROTO)
±3,975 SF

PROPOSED

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS

PROPOSED

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS
TE
20'-2" x
14'-11"

ENHANCED DECORATIVE
PAVING, TYP.
147' FROM THE

PICK-UP WINDOW TO

THE ORDER
POINT
113' FROM THE FROM

THE ORDER POINT TO

THE END OF THE

DRIVE-THROUGH
LANE

ENHANCED

DRIVEWAY

BIKE RACK
CAV
EV
SIGHT-DISTANCETRIANGLE AREA

STAGING
AREA
CAV
EV
TE

CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: STREAM REALTY
3161 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE
IRVINE, CA 92612
CONTACT: MICHAEL GREGG
TEL: (805) 215-6453
EMAIL: MICHEAL.GREGG@STR

SITE INFORMATION
APN: 396-261-38
SITE AREA OF PROJECT SCOPE: 35,400 SF (0.81 AC)
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: C2 - GENERAL COMMERCIAL CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT: A1 - GENERAL AGRICULTURAL
(SURROUNDING LOTS ZONED

BUILDING INFORMATION
OCCUPANCY TYPE: A-2
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB - SPRINKLERED
PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT

PARKING INFORMATION
PARKING REQUIREMENT: 8 SPACES PER 1,000 SF OF GFA
STALLS REQUIRED: 32 STALLS
STALLS PROVIDED: 35 STALLS
LEGEND:

TRASH ENCLOSURE

LANDSCAPE AREA

PROPERTY LINE PER ALTA
150' HOSE PULL DISTANCE
S

FIRE HYDRANT

WATER VALVE

GAS VALVE

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

STREET SIGN

UTILITY POLE

EXISTING BOLLARD
NOTES:

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
ACENT
AURANT

CCO BUILDING
858 SF
EIGHT: ±16'-11"
TE

CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: STREAM REALTY
3161 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 100
IRVINE, CA 92612
CONTACT: MICHAEL GREGG
TEL: (805) 215-6453
EMAIL: [email protected]

BUILDING INFORMATION
OCCUPANCY TYPE: A-2
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB - SPRINKLERED
PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT

PARKING INFORMATION
PARKING REQUIREMENT: 8 SPACES PER 1,000 SF OF GFA
STALLS REQUIRED: 32 STALLS
STALLS PROVIDED: 35 STALLS
LEGEND:

A CLARA AVENUE

SITE PLAN
Scale: 1" = 20'
October 27, 2022
P:\21\21730 - McD Santa Ana2109 E Santa Clara Ave
NORTH

TRASH ENCLOSURE

LANDSCAPE AREA

PROPERTY LINE PER ALTA
150' HOSE PULL DISTANCE
S

FIRE HYDRANT

WATER VALVE

GAS VALVE

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

STREET SIGN

UTILITY POLE

EXISTING BOLLARD
City Council 23 – 83 4/2/2024
McDonald’s Development
FEBRUARY 2023
2109 E SANTA CLARA AVENUE | SANTA ANA, CA

ELEVATIONS (ELEVACIONES)
ELEVACIÓN SUR ELEVACIÓN OESTE
ELEVACIÓN NORTE ELEVACIÓN ESTE
City Council 23 – 84 4/2/2024

2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2024-01, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2024-02, AND AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2024-01 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2101 & 2109 EAST SANTA CLARA AVENUE LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL AGRICULTURAL (A1) ZONING DISTRICT.

Project Applicant: Donald Ellis with Stream Realty Partners (Applicant) representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (Property Owner)
Proposed Project: Applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2024-01 and CUP No. 2024-02, and Amendment Application No. 2024- 01, to allow a zone change from General Agricultural (A1) to Arterial Commercial (C5), and allow for the construction of a 3,975-square-foot fast food eating establishment (McDonald’s) with drive-through window service and after-hours operations (24-hour drive-through). The site plan and related documents are available to the public for review at City Hall at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701 and on the City’s website at https://www.santa-ana.org/mcdonalds-drivethrough-restaurant/.

Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project. The IS/MND’s Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024. The City of Santa Ana has determined, based on the IS/MND, that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment with implementation of recommended mitigation measures. The IS/MND is available to the public for review at City Hall at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701 and on the City’s website at https://www.santa-ana.org/documents/public-review-draft-is-mnd/.

Recommended Actions:

1. Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2024-01;

2. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-01 as conditioned to allow drive through window service; and

3. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-02 as conditioned to allow after-hours operations within 150 feet of residentially zoned and used property.

City Council 23 – 85 4/2/2024
Planning and Building Agency
Meeting Date Display
Item # 2
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Planning Commission Staff Report
February 26, 2024
Topic: AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2024-01;

2. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-01 as conditioned to allow drive through window service; and

3. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-02 as conditioned to allow after-hours operations within 150 feet of residentially zoned and used property.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Donald Ellis with Stream Realty Partners (applicant), representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (property owner), is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2024-01 and 2024-02, as well as Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2024-01, to facilitate construction of a fast food eating establishment (McDonald’s) at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue. The applicant is requesting the two CUPs pursuant to Section 41-365.5 (e) and (f), and Section 41-377.5 (a) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), to allow a restaurant with drive-through window service and to allow the drive-through to operate after-hours (24-hours). Staff is recommending approval of the entitlements as the proposed project will enhance underutilized lots and provide additional services to residents, workers, and visitors in the area. Moreover, the project complies with the General Plan goals and policies as it seeks to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts through the promotion of a clean, safe, and creative environment. Lastly, the project will not negatively impact the surrounding community as the project has been designed to minimize impacts to the nearby sensitive land uses.

DISCUSSION
Project Description
City Council 23 – 86 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

Page 2 ends

Santa Ana City CouncilApril 2, 2024

Santa Ana City Council
April 2, 2024