Santa Ana City Council
April 2, 2024

Table 1: Project and Location Information
Item Information
Project Address and Council Ward 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue – Ward 3 Nearest Intersection North Tustin Avenue and East Santa Clara Avenue General Plan Designation General Commercial (GC) – No change Existing Zoning Designation General Agricultural (A1)
Proposed Zoning Designation Arterial Commercial (C5)
North Commercial center
East Drive-through restaurant
South Multi-family residential (Woodlyn North
Condominiums), preschool/kindergarten,
commercial center
Surrounding Land Uses
West California Highway Patrol station and parking for
Horizon Apartments multi-family residential
community
Property Size 0.81-acres (35,400 square feet)
Existing Site Development
The subject sites contain two one-story, single-family
residences approximately 2,530 and 3,904 square feet in size, with associated accessory structures.

Existing Site Uses Single-family residences (2)
Proposed Building Size 3,975 square feet
Use Permissions Allowed with an amendment application (zone change) and conditional use permit (CUP).

Zoning Code Sections Affected Uses SAMC Section 41-424.5 Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-425-428
The applicant is proposing to demolish two residential structures and associated improvements on two legal lots (2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue), including the associated pool, asphalt concrete paving, and vegetation, in order to construct a new 3,975-square-foot fast food establishment for McDonald’s with 24-hour drive-through operations. The site is currently zoned as General Agricultural (A1), and the proposed project includes an amendment application (zone change) to change the zoning classification to Arterial Commercial (C5) in order to allow the proposed eating establishment and drive-through operations.

The eating establishment is proposed to be integrated within an existing commercial center and would maintain reciprocal access. The establishment would be accessible via three existing vehicle driveway approaches, two along Tustin Avenue and the third along Santa Clara Avenue, with no new driveway/entries proposed as part the project. However, the primary vehicular ingress and egress points and the proposed parking lot would primarily be accessible from the existing driveway along Santa Clara Avenue. The drive-through would be accessible from the existing driveway along Tustin Avenue, and vehicles would travel west/southwest along the proposed drive-through.

City Council 23 – 87 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

As proposed, the establishment would include a dual drive-through lane, limited to the ordering/menu board area and a bypass lane near the pick-up window. The two drivethrough lanes will be available for ordering, which will then merge into a single drive-through lane for pick-up window services. The bypass lane will allow vehicles that have already received their meals to bypass any queued vehicles and ultimately exit via a proposed new driveway along Santa Clara Avenue. Each lane is proposed to have vehicular stacking lanes exceeding the minimum required eighty feet from the center of the pick-up window and eighty feet from the order point.

The applicant proposes various off-site and on-site improvements that include improvements to the public right-of-way (i.e., sidewalks, curbs, street lighting, and access drives), extensive landscaping (perimeter and parking lot), enhanced paving at the two driveway entries, a parking lot with 32 parking stalls, a decorative trash enclosure, and parking lot fixtures. Work would also include the removal of the western most driveway along Santa Clara and replace it with sidewalk, and rebuild the eastern most existing driveway located along Santa Clara Avenue. The proposed eating establishment would include fastfood operations, such as indoor food preparation, cooking, indoor and outdoor eating areas, and restrooms. It will include approximately 802 square feet of dining area with seating for over 30 guests. The proposed hours of operation include 24 hours for drive-through use, 7 days a week, and between 5 a.m. to 1 a.m. for indoor dining use, 7 days a week.

The building is designed in a California contemporary architectural style with a neutral/dark color palette and tones along the outer facades, which would involve materials such as plaster/stucco, aluminum, and metals. The site would provide approximately 8,604 square feet of landscaping throughout the site and the proposed plant palette would consist of a high quality plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and groundcover. The proposed planter areas would be constructed along the northern, western, and southern site perimeters and would provide decorative screening and a buffer between the eating establishment and the adjacent, off-site land uses, in addition to being placed centrally within the proposed surface parking lot and adjacent to the proposed drive-through. Table 2 below provides a detailed comparison of the project’s compliance with the applicable land use and development standards.

Table 2: Development Standards
Standard Required by General
Commercial (C5) Zone Provided
Front yard 15 feet minimum Complies: 15 feet
Side yard (interior) 0 feet minimum Complies; 29-125 feet Rear yard 0 feet minimum Complies; 39 feet
Lot Size &
Frontage 15,000 sq. ft. and 120 feet Complies; 35,400 sq. ft. and 200 ft.

Building height 35 feet maximum Complies; 23 feet
City Council 23 – 88 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

Standard Required by General
Commercial (C5) Zone Provided
Parking 32 spaces minimum (8 spaces
per 1,000 sq. ft. restaurant) Complies; 32 spaces
Floor Area Ratio
(F.A.R.) 0.50 FAR maximum Complies; 0.11 FAR
Stacking Distance 160 feet; 80 feet to menu board
and 80 feet to pick-up window
Complies; 113 feet from the order point/
menu board to beginning of drive-through
lane, 147 feet from pick-up window/pay
window to the menu board
Project Background
The earliest aerial imagery from 1938 shows that the subject properties appeared to be first developed as an orchard. No buildings or structures were present on site at this time and most of the surrounding area was used for orchards, with some houses and agricultural buildings in the vicinity. The single-family residence addressed as 2101 E.

Santa Clara Avenue was constructed at an unknown date and moved to the site in 1967.

In 1967, a permit was issued to relocate the home within the site and build a new garage approximately 660 square feet in size. The single-family residence addressed as 2109 E.

Santa Clara Avenue was constructed circa 1957 and included the main house and garage. The house remained surrounded by orchard trees, as well as most of the surrounding properties in the area. The rest of the now-commercial shopping center remained undeveloped until 1972. Today, the two subject properties are legal nonconforming, as they do not meet most of the development standards for the underlying zone and were constructed prior to 1960.

Based on permit and title records, both 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue were owned by the Newcomb family until they were sold to SRP Stater Bros, LLC in February 2021. In April 2022, Development Project (DP) Review application (No. 2022-06) was submitted for review and consideration by the City’s Development Review Committee (DRC). The applicant revised the project following the first community meeting in late April 2022, and subsequently resubmitted the DP application in December 2022. Thereafter, several site plan changes and project submittals were made to the City following the second community meeting in February 2023. In March 2023, the property owners submitted a voluntary lot merger application (No. 2023-02) to consolidate 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue into a single legal lot. The lot merger application was executed and recorded in June 2023. Before the DP application could be deemed complete, the project underwent several months of environmental review which concluded in late December 2023. Subsequently, the DP application was deemed complete on December 13, 2023, and the required entitlement applications were submitted January 8, 2024.

City Council 23 – 89 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

Project Analysis
Amendment Application
The subject site is zoned General Agricultural (A1). The allowable land uses and development standards pertaining to the A1 zoning district would render the project infeasible, as eating establishments are prohibited by the A1 zoning district. Approval of an amendment application to change the zoning district to Arterial Commercial (C5) is required for the project.

The proposed zone change intends to align the subject site with the existing shopping center development to the north and east, and intends to align with the commercial corridor along Tustin Avenue, which is largely zoned C5. Moreover, the proposed C5 zoning district designation is also consistent with the new General Commercial (GC) General Plan Land Use Element designation for the site that resulted from the April 2022 General Plan Update. This land use designation encourages developments that provide highly visible and accessible shopping opportunities along arterial corridors and supports the development and continued operation of recreational, cultural, entertainment, employment, and educational opportunities near established residential neighborhoods.

The proposed project has been designed as a single-story McDonald’s building with a maximum height of 23 feet to the top of the parapet. In designing the proposed development, consideration was given to scale, massing, and architecture of the project to ensure that it complements the existing buildings within the surrounding development.

Conditional Use Permit for Drive-Through Window Service Although eating establishments are permitted by-right in the C5 zoning district, eating establishment with drive-through window service and after-hours operations between 12:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. require approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) by the Planning Commission. The zoning district designation of C5 enables the applicant to submit the required CUP applications for consideration by the Planning Commission to conditionally permit the proposed drive-through and 24-hour operations.

Pursuant to Section 41-424.5 (e) of the SAMC, eating establishments with drive-through service require approval of a CUP. The applicant’s request for a CUP to allow drive-through window service will provide an added amenity to the property, for the employees who work in the vicinity and for the residents who live in the general area. In addition, the proposed McDonald’s will generate new and permanent employment opportunities in favor of the economic growth and stability of the City, activate a previously underutilized area, and generate property and sales tax revenue for the City.

City Council 23 – 90 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

The project would be required to meet all development standards and would apply for ministerial permits through the City, including a demolition permit, landscape permit, grading permit, building permits and occupancy permits. With approval of the zone change and CUP, the proposed project would be consistent with the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). In addition, the project is located within an area characterized primarily by retail and commercial uses. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the C5 zoning district, would not conflict with the SAMC, and would be consistent with the GC land use designation.

The proposed drive-through was designed and intended to generate the least amount of community impacts as possible. An analysis of the site access and site circulation determined that the proposed site plan provides adequate spaces for vehicles to maneuver through the project site and drive-through. In addition, a drive-through evaluation was provided which was intended to determine if the proposed circulation plan provides adequate on-site drive-through storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site vehicle demands. The analysis determined that the dual drive-through lanes exceed the City’s stacking requirements and will allow for a storage capacity of approximately 16 cars, which is sufficient capacity to accommodate average and peak vehicle demands for the proposed project without disrupting drive aisles or on-site parking spaces.

As designed, the proposed building will implement many of the current McDonald’s restaurant design improvements. McDonald’s restaurants are designed to optimize operations, drive-through lane configurations, parking, and on-site circulation. To reduce the vehicle drive-through wait time, McDonald’s has developed equipment and procedures to improve cook times and crew efficiency. These improvements include dual order boards (or a side-by-side drive-through) that enables customers to place orders earlier. The side-byside drive-through allows two cars to stack next to each other which allows the kitchen more cook time to prepare the food to have it ready by the time the customer gets to the pickup window.

Since the proposed McDonald’s provides a drive-through storage capacity of 16 vehicles, the proposed drive-through lane will accommodate the reference average queue length of 5 to 11 vehicles. At no time does the existing or reference peak queue exceed a maximum of 15 vehicles. The drive-through queuing analysis demonstrates that the maximum vehicle queue of 16 vehicles can be accommodated within the drive-through. The site plan provides adequate drive-through storage capacity to serve the average queue length of 5 to 11 vehicles within the drive-through lane. During peak drive-through demands, the site plan can accommodate a total of 16 vehicles within the drive-through. Therefore, peak queuing can be accommodated within the drive-through as designed, and vehicles queuing in the drive-through will have adequate space to queue within the project and will not enter onto East Santa Clara Avenue.

City Council 23 – 91 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

The drive-through operation is also designed to generate minimal noise impacts as the speaker boards are located towards the rear of the site (north elevation), away from the closest residential units, and are oriented towards the existing shopping center. Any potential noise generated from the idling of vehicles or the drive-through speakers is not anticipated to impact the closest residential uses as they are approximately 250 feet away to the south. The site has been designed to include a large landscape area which will help buffer light and noise impacts to the residential uses. Moreover, the site design will include 24-inch box trees and large shrubs planted along the southern property line to create a visual buffer between the drive-through lanes.

Conditional Use Permit for After-Hours Service
Pursuant to Section 41-424.5 (j) of the SAMC, eating establishments located within 150 feet of properties zoned or used for residential purposes that wish to operate between the hours of 12:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. require approval of a separate CUP. The purpose of regulating after-hours operations is to preserve the surrounding community characteristics and minimize any negative secondary impacts. Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request to operate the McDonald’s eating establishment and drive-through window service 24-hours per day and has determined that the operations will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity.

The property to the west/northwest of the project site, addressed as 2414 N. Tustin Avenue, is currently used for residential purposes and known as the Horizon Apartments. Although the apartment complex is within 150 feet of the subject property, as measured from property lines, the nearest residential unit would be located over 200 feet from the northwest corner of the subject property, and over 240 feet from the new building and drive-through operations. The area immediately west of the project site is currently used for site access (i.e., driveway entrance, drive aisles, etc.) and covered and uncovered parking stalls. The nearest residential unit would be located over 360 feet from the public right-of-way along East Santa Clara Avenue to the south. A second residential community known as the Woodlyn North Condominiums is located to the south of the project site. Built in 1963, the community has 25 buildings containing a total of 87 condominiums. The community is within 150 feet of the subject property, as measured from property lines. However, only one condominium building would be located within the 150 feet, and that one building would be located over 120 feet from the proposed drive-through lane and over 140 feet from the new building.

In staff’s analysis, the 24-hour operations would not generate additional community impacts and would have minimal to no impacts to the adjacent residences as it relates to lighting.

This is due to the location of the proposed building and drive-through and the separation distance to existing residential units as described above. Specifically, the project site is in an area that is already subject to significant ambient lighting (e.g., exterior building lights, City Council 23 – 92 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

parking lot pole lights, interior building lights, streetlights, etc.) from the existing commercial/retail uses surrounding the site. The proposed project would involve new streetlights and additional exterior and interior building lighting associated with the operation of the proposed McDonald’s. However, all lighting would be subject to the City’s design guidelines, which outlines lighting standards for commercial projects and includes direction on minimizing glare onto adjoining properties. Moreover, all on-site lighting would be shielded and directed to minimize light intrusion onto the adjacent properties. The lighting levels for the site would not be altered and would be consistent with the ambient and nighttime lighting at the commercial uses surrounding the site. Lastly, the site plan has been designed so that vehicle headlights would not create lighting concerns to the residential units to the south. Specifically, the building and drive-through have been offset so that the pickup window is not aligned directly with any residential windows. In addition, the project will incorporate a landscape buffer with various mature landscaping (shrubs, trees, and groundcover) along Santa Clara Avenue. Staff is recommending a condition of approval that the mature landscaping be evergreen, be required to be maintained throughout the lifetime of the CUP, that it be maintained healthy, and that any unhealthy or dead plants be required to be removed and replaced in-kind.

The 24-hour drive-through operations would also have minimal to no impacts to the adjacent residences as it relates to noise. The overall operations would not generate noise levels above the maximum acceptable noise levels outlined in the City’s Noise Ordinance, as shown in Table 3 below. The daily operation of the proposed eating establishment has the potential to result in an increased ambient noise level in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site through the addition of stationary sources of noise as well as vehicular trips associated with the project. These stationary sources of noise include HVAC equipment, landscape maintenance equipment, parking lot activities, trash collection activities, and restaurant drive-through speakers. Noise associated with the parking lot activities consists of vehicle engines, door slams, engine starts, and people talking. However, the stationary sources during the times of 1:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. would be limited to just the drive-through operations as the indoor dining area would be closed during this time. These noise sources include the drive-through window and a menu board with an amplified speaker, in addition to non-amplified speech.

Table 3: City Of Santa Ana Noise Ordinance Standards
Noise Level dBA Time Period Exterior Interior Compliance 7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. 55 55 Complies (max 55dBA)
10:00 p.m. – 7:00 am 50 45 Complies (max 45dBa)
dBA: A-weighted decibels
*Applicable to property within a designated Noise Zone 1. The entire City of Santa Ana is designed as Noise Zone 1 per Sec. 18- 311 of the Municipal Code.

City Council 23 – 93 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

The noise associated with the proposed project’s drive-through operations were evaluated as part of the environmental document prepared (i.e., Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration). The document concluded that the noise levels associated with the parking lot, drive-through window, and menu board were below the City’s noise limits for nearby land uses. Nevertheless, to ensure that the 24-hour operations are not detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare, staff is recommending conditions of approval that would help ensure that the operations would not generate noise impacts or that would help reduce the impacts to negligible conditions. These conditions of approval include maintaining a landscape buffer along the southern and western property lines, and ensuring that the project complies with the City’s Noise Ordinance at all times. As described above, the landscaping would be required to be mature and evergreen, be required to be maintained throughout the lifetime of the CUP, and be maintained healthy.

Police Department Analysis
The Police Department reviews conditional use permit applications for after-hours operations in order to ensure that potential crime or nuisance behaviors associated with such a use are mitigated to the greatest extent possible. For after-hours operations, the Police Department analyzes the crime rate in the area by matching the location of the subject site’s census tract to the corresponding Police Grid. The City of Santa Ana contains up to 102 police reporting grids. The Police Department generates an annual report, the Citywide Incident Ranking report, which ranks these reporting grids based on police activity. The Police Department then compares the number of such crimes in the reporting district as compared to the number of crimes in other reporting districts. In keeping with the standard used by the State Business and Professions Code, should the Police Department determine that the reporting district has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number found in all reporting districts, the Police Department would consider this information in making its recommendation.

Table 4: Police Department Analysis and Criteria for Recommendation Police Department Analysis and Criteria for Recommendation Police Grid No. and
Rank
Police Grid No. 242; ranked 82 out of 102 Police Reporting Grids (81st percentile).

Threshold for High
Crime
This reporting district is below the 20 percent threshold established by the State for high crime.

Police Department
Recommendation
As part of the review approval process, this application was analyzed by the Santa Ana Police Department. Based on the Police Department’s most recent Citywide Incident Ranking Report, the Police Department has no issues of concern regarding the activity in that area, due to no significant events occurring. Therefore, the Police Department does not oppose the granting of a CUP for 24-hour operations.

City Council 23 – 94 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

The Police Department reviewed Police related activity (i.e., calls for service and reported incidents) within 500-feet of each separate parcel (2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue) for the last year, which include both residential and commercial areas. The Police Department found that the subject sites have received 305 calls for service within 500- feet of 2101 E. Santa Clara Avenue and 379 calls for service within 500-feet of 2109 E.

Santa Clara Avenue. These calls of service include, but are not limited to, traffic hazards, petty theft, burglaries, transient activities, assaults, or municipal code violations. Reported incidents include, but are not limited to, domestic violence, collisions, traffic related, animal related, or missing person. Of these types of incidents, fifty-six (56) were reported within 500-feet of 2101 E. Santa Clara Avenue and sixty-nine (69) incidents were reported within 500-feet of 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue. While the reported activities were nearby the project site, the Police Department does not believe that it should reflect negatively on the proposed restaurant or after-hours drive-through activity. Furthermore, the Police Department contends that the operational standards applicable to after-hours and drivethrough activity will mitigate any potential impacts to the surrounding community and therefore does not oppose the granting of the CUPs.

Traffic/Vehicle Safety
The Police Department also provided a Collision Summary Report for the Tustin and Santa Clara Avenue intersection, which reported vehicle and pedestrian collisions from January 1, 2017, through January 1, 2024. The report summarized that during that time there was 67 collisions, of which 37 included injury collisions, with 61 individuals reported as injured. The reporting included collision types such as, broadside, vehicle-pedestrian, sideswipe, rear-end, and head-on collisions. Moreover, during January 1, 2023 and January 31, 2024, there were 19 calls for service for collisions, one call for service that was “traffic related,” four drunk driver calls, and 7 hit-and-run collision calls for services, all within 500-feet of the properties. The reported incidents within 500-feet for the same period (January 1, 2023 and January 31, 2024) included six hit-and-run collisions and six collision incidents reported.

General Plan Consistency
The General Plan Update (GPU) was adopted in April 2022, after a seven-year effort of extensive community participation. Engagement efforts and interactions with the community included over 60 community meetings and workshops, online surveys, direct mailers to property owners and tenants, and multiple study sessions. Moreover, they included one-on-one meetings with the Planning Commission and City Council, which allowed for an informed and inclusive decision-making process. These efforts resulted in the crafting of the land use plan within the Land Use Element that reflects the community’s visions for Santa Ana’s growth and development citywide. The updated Land Use City Council 23 – 95 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

Element of the General Plan reflects and sets the community’s land use and development policies and a vision for future development of the City.

Prior to the GPU, the subject properties had a split land use designation of Institutional (INS) and General Commercial (GC). As a result of the GPU, the land use designation for the properties were updated to fully be GC, consistent with the adjacent commercial center properties. However, the GPU did result in a zoning inconsistency, as the properties were still zoned General Agricultural (A1), which does not allow for eating establishments. To address this inconsistency, the overall project includes an amendment application to change the zoning district to Arterial Commercial (C5) is required for the project.

The approval of the proposed project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC). The project would provide an added amenity to the existing commercial shopping center and would promote a land use that enhances the City’s economic fiscal viability and mitigates any potential impacts to the surrounding community. The after-hours operations will contribute to the viability of the site creating a business environment that is safe and attractive. Moreover, the project has been designed to be consistent with several goals and policies of the General Plan as discussed below. • Goal LU-2: Land Use Needs – Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana’s diverse needs
o Policy 2.2 Capture Local Spending – Encourage a range of commercial uses to capture a greater share of local spending and offer a range of employment opportunities.
o Policy 2.6 Encourage Investment – Promote rehabilitation of properties and encourage increased levels of capital investment to create a safe and attractive environment.
o Policy 2.7 Business Incubator – Support land use decisions that encourage the creation, development, and retention of business in Santa Ana The project is consistent with Goal LU-2 and Policies 2.2, 2.6, and 2.7, as it will allow for additional service to Santa Ana residents and visitors, thereby positively contributing to the economic viability of the area by promoting local spending, offering employment opportunities, and providing a safe workplace. In addition, the applicant is making an investment to rehabilitate the site to allow for a safe and attractive establishment by expanding the commercial center and improving the circulation throughout. Lastly, the proposed project would also preserve the character of the existing commercial area and promotes the rehabilitation of properties by proposing to remove a blighted and underutilized land use to create a safe and attractive environment.

City Council 23 – 96 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

• Goal LU-3: Compatibility of Uses – Preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts.
o Policy 3.4 Compatible Development – Ensure that the scale and massing of new development is compatible and harmonious with the surrounding built environment.
o Policy 3.7 Attractive Environment – Promote a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.

The project is consistent with Goal LU-3 and Policies 3.4 and 3.7, as the proposed improvements would preserve the character of the existing commercial area. The scale and massing of the new project is proposed to be compatible with the existing commercial center, as consideration was given to scale, massing, and architecture of the project to ensure that it complements the existing buildings within the surrounding development.

Moreover, the project would include aesthetically pleasing features, such as landscaping with a variety of plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and groundcover, which would further help enhanced the viability of the commercial center, would create a harmonious environment, and would help promote a clean and safe environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.
• Goal EP-1: Job Creation and Retention – Foster a dynamic local economy that provides and create employment opportunities for all residents in the City. o Policy 1.2 Attract Business – Promote new and retain existing job-producing businesses that provide living-wage employment opportunities.

The project is consistent with Goal EP-1 and Policy 1.2, as the proposed improvements would help generate additional economic growth and stability in the City by further activating underutilized parcels and helping generate property and sales tax revenue.

Furthermore, the proposed project would help create a job-producing establishment thereby providing employment opportunities to Santa Ana residents. • Goal EP-3: Business Friendly Environment – Promote a business friendly environment where businesses thrive and build on Santa Ana’s strengths and opportunities.
o Policy 3.7 Facilitating Investment – Promote a solution-based customer focus in order to facilitate additional development and investment in the community.
o Policy 3.8 Comprehensive Analysis of Land Use – Pursue a balance of fiscal and qualitative community benefits when making land use decisions.

The project would be consistent with Goal EP-3 and Policies 3.7 and 3.8, as it provides for redevelopment of existing underutilized single-family residences and promotes a new eating establishment that would provide services to the community. Moreover, the project City Council 23 – 97 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

would help create a friendly business environment and help the overall commercial center to enhance their business offerings and compete with nearby commercial centers. Lastly, by working on an improved site design with the applicant, staff ensured that that project provided a high level of community investment for residents, workers, and visitors in the area.

Public Notification and Community Outreach
Project notifications were posted, published, and mailed in accordance with City and State regulations. Copies of the public notice, including a 1,000-foot notification radius map, and the site posting are provided in Exhibit 12. In addition to these measures, representatives of the Portola Park, Mabury Park, Meredith Parkwood, Fairbridge Square, and Young Square Neighborhood Associations were contacted to identify any areas of concern due to the proposed request. At the time this report was printed, over 52 written comments were received, both in favor and opposition of the project. In addition, over 350 support cards were received for the project. The comments in opposition raised issues/concerns related to increased traffic and congestion, transient activities, safety concerns, property values, and quality of life.

Sunshine Ordinance Consistency
In addition to the above noticing, the project was subject to the City’s Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS-3040) requiring two meetings to facilitate early public participation.

The first community meeting was held April 21, 2022. Twelve members of the community attended and posed questions relating to hours of operation, on-site traffic circulation, and site lighting. The second community meeting was held February 2, 2023, during which over 25 members of the community attended and posed questions related to increased traffic concerns along Santa Clara Avenue, status of traffic study, status of the existing single-family homes and proposed relocation/demolition, hours of operations, entitlement timeline and process, on-site traffic circulation, and traffic collision concerns along Santa Clara Avenue. Materials from the two required community meetings are included with this report as Exhibit 11, and all materials were published to the project’s webpage on the City’s website at www.santa-ana.org/mcdonalds-drive-throughrestaurant/.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Section 21000 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code) and in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq. of the California Code of Regulations), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project and has been attached to this report as Exhibit 10. The purpose City Council 23 – 98 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

of the IS/MND is to describe the proposed project and to provide an evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with the project’s construction and operation.

Moreover, the IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts of project implementation; includes significance determinations from the environmental analyses; identifies regulatory requirements to be incorporated into the project; and sets forth mitigation measures that will lessen or avoid potentially significant project impacts on the environment.

The IS/MND determined that the proposed project would have no impact, or less than significant impacts with mitigation measures, in all topics outlined in the CEQA Environmental Checklist. Possible impacts identified in the IS/MND include those related to Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. With implementation of mitigation measures (MM) listed below, all potential impacts would be less than significant.
• MM CUL-1: Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the Applicant shall retain an Orange County-certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary.
• MM GEO-1: Prior to commencement earthmoving activities, the Applicant shall retain a qualified Orange County-certified Paleontologist for on-call services in the event of a discovery of paleontologically sensitive rock formations during ground disturbance activities.
• MM HAZ-1: Any additional materials discovered during demolition activities shall be collected and analyzed prior to removal or disturbance of materials. • MM HAZ-2: Prior to demolition, all asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and asbestos containing construction materials (ACCMs) shall be removed from the structures at the Project site.
• MM TCR-1: Prior to commencement of ground disturbing activities, the Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor.
• MM TCR-2: Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resource Objects, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity shall cease. • MM TCR-3: Upon discovery of any human remains and associated funerary or ceremonial objects, actions pursuant to Public Resource Code 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code 7050.5 shall occur.

The IS/MND’s analysis determined that the above-mentioned environmental categories would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of the enforceable mitigation measures, that would be adopted by the City. The final Mitigation City Council 23 – 99 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

and Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) can be found as part of the overall environmental documents provided in Exhibit 10.

Historic or Cultural Significance
Two built environment resources over 45 years old were identified within the project site:
2101 and 2109 East Santa Clara Avenue. The properties were recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Forms in consideration of California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and local City designation criteria and integrity requirements. Both properties were found not eligible under all state and local designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit. No historical resources were identified within the project site as a result of this study. Therefore, with respect to built environment resources, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact on historical resources under CEQA.

Traffic Impacts
A Transportation Analysis was prepared for the proposed project by Urban Crossroads, dated August 16, 2023. The findings of the analysis were summarized in Section 4.17 (Transportation) of the IS/MND, and the Transportation Analysis in its entirety is included as Appendix K to the Draft IS/MND. The Transportation Analysis included a Level of Service (LOS) analysis, which is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on several factors including speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Moreover, the project specific Transportation Analysis conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis to determine the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection, including at the intersection of the Driveway 1 (located along Santa Clara Avenue) and Santa Clara Avenue, and the intersection between Tustin Avenue and Driveway 2 (located along Tustin Avenue). Lastly, a Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Evaluation was prepared by Urban Crossroads, dated December 11, 2023 and included as Appendix L to the Draft IS/MND.

The Transportation Analysis addressed traffic conditions for multiple different scenarios, including existing (2022) baseline conditions, existing with Project conditions, opening year (2023) cumulative without Project conditions, opening year cumulative with Project conditions, horizon year without Project conditions (2040), and horizon year with Project conditions. A queuing analysis was performed for the left turning movements at the intersection of Tustin Avenue and Santa Clara Avenue to assess vehicle queues along the roadways and prevent dangerous intersections. In summary, the intersection left turning movements currently experience and are anticipated to experience acceptable queuing during the peak hours based on the 95th percentile peak hour traffic flows for City Council 23 – 100 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

each of the scenarios proposed above. The queuing analysis findings are presented in Appendix K to the Draft IS/MND.

As concluded by the Transportation Analysis, the addition of project traffic would not trigger the City of Santa Ana’s significance criteria, and no traffic signal is warranted for either intersection, intersection of the Driveway 1 (located along Santa Clara Avenue) and Santa Clara Avenue, and the intersection between Tustin Avenue and Driveway 2 (located along Tustin Avenue). Moreover, the Transportation Analysis performed a drivethrough analysis to determine if the proposed circulation plan provided adequate on-site drive-through storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site vehicle demand.

Ultimately, the drive-through analysis suggested that the project would provide stacking accommodations for approximately 16 vehicles within the drive-through, and there would be sufficient capacity to accommodate average and peak vehicle demands for the proposed project.

In 2013, the State of California signed into law Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), which changes how transportation impacts are analyzed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in order to help reduce transportation impacts. Specifically, in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas impacts and create long-term sustainability, SB 743 changed the standard for evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA from a LOS standard to Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”) standard. This statewide mandate went into effect July 1, 2020. In 2019, the City of Santa Ana adopted Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019), which states that several types of projects can be screened out from a VMT assessment using identified criteria, indicating that these projects have the potential to reduce VMT per service population and result in a less-than-significant transportation impacts. The City’s Guidelines list standardized screening methods for project level VMT analysis that can be used to identify when a proposed land use development project is anticipated to result in a less than significant impact thereby eliminating the need to conduct a full VMT analysis. The City of Santa Ana VMT screening types, as described within the City Guidelines, are listed below:
• Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
• Low VMT Area Screening
• Project Type Screening
A land use project need only to meet one of the above screening thresholds to result in a less than significant impact. Pursuant to the VMT Screening Evaluation prepared by Urban Crossroads, the project did not meet the threshold for TPA or Low VMT screening.

However, the project was found to meet the Project Type screening criteria. Pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (dated September 2019), local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. The proposed project City Council 23 – 101 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

would develop a drive-through quick serve restaurant of 3,975 square feet, which is below the 50,000 square feet project type screening threshold as identified. Therefore, the project is presumed to result in a less than significant impact for VMT, and thus no further VMT analysis was required and no mitigation measures were required. Lastly, the VMT Screening Evaluation was thoroughly peer reviewed by the City’s Traffic Engineer and the City’s CEQA consultant, both which concluded that the VMT Screening Evaluation prepared for the project shows the project is screened out from any full VMT analysis.

Overall, the project would incorporate all recommendations provided by the Transportation Analysis. These include that the project maintain existing traffic controls and configuration at project driveways, and that on-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented agreeable with the provisions of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project site. Additionally, the applicant’s responsibility for the project’s contributions towards deficient off-site intersections is fulfilled through payment into pre-existing fee programs that would be assigned to the future construction of any future local/regional improvement needs (e.g., payment of fair share and/or fees for the applicable pre-existing fee programs/permit impact fees).

With incorporation of all recommendations provided by the Transportation Analysis, the project would not substantially increase traffic hazards or congestion. Nonetheless, the applicant has expressed a willingness to install additional traffic safety enhancements as requested by the City to ensure that traffic circulation patterns are not further impacted or worsened, and ensure that the proposed operations will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity.

Public Review Process
The IS/MND’s Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024. The NOI was also mailed out to all properties within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. The IS/MND was made available for public view at the City Hall Planning counter, Santa Ana Library in the Civic Center and on the City website.

A total of five comment letters from one agency and four individuals were received during and immediately after the public review period. The City has reviewed all comments to determine whether any substantial new environmental issues have been raised.

Moreover, the City has provided responses to all written comments, which can be found in the Responses to Comments (RTC) and MMRP document. Based on the evaluation in the IS/MND together with the comments received, the City has determined that no substantial new environmental issues have been raised that have not been adequately addressed in the IS/MND and/or in this RTC and MMRP document. All potential impacts City Council 23 – 102 4/2/2024
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02 for McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
February 26, 2024

associated with the project were found to be less than significant with incorporation of identified mitigation measures, where applicable. Therefore, the project would not result in any significant impacts and an IS/MND is the appropriate environmental document for the project in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The City’s final RTC and MMRP document is provided in Exhibit 10. As of this printing, no additional comments or communications from the public have been received on the IS/MND. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-16 will be filed for this project.

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS
Jobs that would be created during construction would be short-term and would be typically filled by existing residents of the region. The project would include a maximum of twelve permanent employees working approximately three shifts per day, which would result in a maximum of 36 employees per day. As with the temporary construction workers, longterm operation employees are anticipated to be filled by existing residents of the region.

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Amendment Application Ordinance

2. Conditional Use Permit Resolution – Drive-Through Facility

3. Conditional Use Permit Resolution – After-Hours Operations

4. Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map

5. Site Photos

6. Project Site Plan

7. Project Floor and Roof Plan

8. Preliminary Landscape Plan

9. Project Elevations

10.Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)

11.Sunshine Ordinance Meetings Documents

12.Copy of Public Notices
Submitted By:

Pedro Gomez, AICP, Senior Planner
Approved By:

Minh Thai, Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency City Council 23 – 103 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA ANA APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION
NO. 2024-01 AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2101 AND 2109 E. SANTA
CLARA AVENUE (APN: 396-261-26 AND 396-261-38) FROM
GENERAL AGRICULTURAL (A1) TO ARTERIAL
COMMERCIAL (C5)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:

A. Donald Ellis with Stream Realty Partners (applicant), representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (property owner) is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2024-01 to change the zoning designation of the properties located at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue (APN: 396-261-26 AND 396-261-38) from General Agricultural (A1) to Arterial Commercial (C5) in order to facilitate the eating establishment with a drive-through and 24-hour operations.

B. Chapter 41, Article I, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes that because of the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land; and regulating the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open spaces, the City is divided into land-use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulations and provide for their enforcement. The regulations are considered necessary in order to:
encourage the most appropriate use of land, conserve and stabilize property value, provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City. The City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map which has since been amended from time to time.

C. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted the General Plan Update, which went into effect on May 26, 2022. The General Plan designation for this property is General Commercial (GC).

D. The entire project as currently proposed entails a request for approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-01 and 2024-02, to allow a restaurant with drive-through window service and to allow the drive-through to operate after-hours (24-hours).

City Council 23 – 104 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

E. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds that the entirety of Amendment Application No. 2024-01 is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the General Plan Designation of General Commercial as well its goals and policies, as follows:
• Goal LU-2: Land Use Needs – Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana’s diverse needs
o Policy 2.2 Capture Local Spending – Encourage a range of commercial uses to capture a greater share of local spending and offer a range of employment opportunities.
o Policy 2.6 Encourage Investment – Promote rehabilitation of properties and encourage increased levels of capital
investment to create a safe and attractive environment. o Policy 2.7 Business Incubator – Support land use decisions that encourage the creation, development, and retention of business in Santa Ana
The project is consistent with Goal LU-2 and Policies 2.2, 2.6, and 2.7, as it will allow for additional service to Santa Ana residents and visitors, thereby positively contributing to the economic viability of the area by promoting local spending, offering employment opportunities, and providing a safe workplace. In addition, the applicant is making an investment to rehabilitate the site to allow for a safe and attractive establishment by expanding the commercial center and improving the circulation throughout. Lastly, the project would also preserve the character of the existing commercial area and promotes the rehabilitation of properties by proposing to remove a blighted and underutilized land use to create a safe and attractive environment.
• Goal LU-3: Compatibility of Uses – Preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts. o Policy 3.4 Compatible Development – Ensure that the scale and massing of new development is compatible and
harmonious with the surrounding built environment.
o Policy 3.7 Attractive Environment – Promote a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.

The project is consistent with Goal LU-3 and Policies 3.4 and 3.7, as the improvements would preserve the character of the existing commercial area. The scale and massing of the new project is to be compatible with the existing commercial center, as consideration was given to scale, massing, and architecture of the project to ensure that it complements the existing buildings within the surrounding development. Moreover, the project would include aesthetically pleasing features, such as landscaping with a variety of plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and City Council 23 – 105 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

groundcover, which would further help enhanced the viability of the commercial center, would create a harmonious environment, and would help promote a clean and safe environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.
• Goal EP-1: Job Creation and Retention – Foster a dynamic local economy that provides and create employment opportunities for all residents in the City.
o Policy 1.2 Attract Business – Promote new and retain existing job-producing businesses that provide living-wage
employment opportunities.

The project is consistent with Goal EP-1 and Policy 1.2, as the improvements would help generate additional economic growth and stability in the City by further activating underutilized parcels and helping generate property and sales tax revenue. Furthermore, the project would help create a job-producing establishment thereby providing employment opportunities to Santa Ana residents.
• Goal EP-3: Business Friendly Environment – Promote a business friendly environment where businesses thrive and build on Santa Ana’s strengths and opportunities.
o Policy 3.7 Facilitating Investment – Promote a solution-based customer focus in order to facilitate additional development and investment in the community.
o Policy 3.8 Comprehensive Analysis of Land Use – Pursue a balance of fiscal and qualitative community benefits when making land use decisions.

The project would be consistent with Goal EP-3 and Policies 3.7 and 3.8, as it provides for redevelopment of existing underutilized single-family residences and promotes a new eating establishment that would provide services to the community. Moreover, the project would help create a friendly business environment and help the overall commercial center to enhance their business offerings and compete with nearby commercial centers. Lastly, by working on an improved site design with the applicant, staff ensured that that project provided a high level of community investment for residents, workers, and visitors in the area.

F. The Applicant has demonstrated compliance with all requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance codified at Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-153, including public notification and hosting of required community meetings.

Materials resulting from the meetings were subsequently posted to the City’s webpage for the project.

G. On February 26, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2024-01.

City Council 23 – 106 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

H. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Amendment Application No. 2024-01 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code; thus, changing the zoning district is found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare.

Section 2. The Amendment Application consists of amendments to the Zoning Map, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the analysis performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2023-16). Pursuant to the requirements of the CEQA, as amended (Section 21000 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code) and in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq. of the California Code of Regulations), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project. The purpose of the IS/MND is to describe the proposed project and to provide an evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with the project’s construction and operation. Moreover, the IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts of project implementation; includes significance determinations from the environmental analyses; identifies regulatory requirements to be incorporated into the project; and sets forth mitigation measures that will lessen or avoid potentially significant project impacts on the environment.

The IS/MND determined that the proposed project would have no impact, or less than significant impacts with mitigation measures, in all topics outlined in the CEQA Environmental Checklist. Possible impacts identified in the IS/MND include those related to Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. With implementation of mitigation measures (MM) listed below, all potential impacts would be less than significant.
• MM CUL-1: Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the Applicant shall retain an Orange County-certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary.
• MM GEO-1: Prior to commencement earthmoving activities, the Applicant shall retain a qualified Orange County-certified Paleontologist for on-call services in the event of a discovery of paleontologically sensitive rock formations during ground disturbance activities.
• MM HAZ-1: Any additional materials discovered during demolition activities shall be collected and analyzed prior to removal or disturbance of materials. • MM HAZ-2: Prior to demolition, all asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and asbestos containing construction materials (ACCMs) shall be removed from the structures at the Project site.
• MM TCR-1: Prior to commencement of ground disturbing activities, the Applicant City Council 23 – 107 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

shall retain a Native American Monitor.
• MM TCR-2: Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resource Objects, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity shall cease. • MM TCR-3: Upon discovery of any human remains and associated funerary or ceremonial objects, actions pursuant to Public Resource Code 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code 7050.5 shall occur.

The IS/MND’s analysis determined that the above-mentioned environmental categories would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of the enforceable mitigation measures, that would be adopted by the City.

Historic or Cultural Significance
Two built environment resources over 45 years old were identified within the project site:
2101 and 2109 Santa Clara Avenue. The properties were recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Forms in consideration of California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and local City designation criteria and integrity requirements. Both properties were found not eligible under all state and local designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit. No historical resources were identified within the project site as a result of this study. Therefore, with respect to built environment resources, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact on historical resources under CEQA.

Traffic Impacts
The project specific Transportation Analysis conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis to determine the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection, including at the intersection of the Driveway 1 (located along Santa Clara Avenue) and Santa Clara Avenue, and the intersection between Tustin Avenue and Driveway 2 (located along Tustin Avenue).

As concluded by the Transportation Analysis, the addition of project traffic would not trigger the City of Santa Ana’s significance criteria, and no traffic signal is warranted for either intersection. In addition, the Transportation Analysis performed a drive-through analysis to determine if the proposed circulation plan provided adequate on-site drivethrough storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site vehicle demand. Ultimately, the drive-through analysis suggested that the project would provide stacking accommodations for approximately 16 vehicles within the drive-through, and there would be sufficient capacity to accommodate average and peak vehicle demands for the proposed project.

The IS/MND’s Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024. The NOI was also mailed out to all properties within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. The IS/MND was made available for public view at the City Hall Planning counter, Santa Ana Library in the Civic Center and on the City website. As of this printing, no comments or communications from the public have been received on the IS/MND. Based on this City Council 23 – 108 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-16 will be filed for this project.

Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Amendment Application No. 2024-01 changing the zoning designation of the properties located at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue (APN: 396-261-26 and 396-261-38) from General Agricultural (A1) to Arterial Commercial (C5). This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated February 26, 2024 and exhibits attached hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 5. An amended Sectional District Map, showing the above described changes in use district designation, is hereby approved and attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.

Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Section 8. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.

ADOPTED this day of , 2024.

Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney
By:

Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney
City Council 23 – 109 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NSXXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2024 and that said ordinance was published in
accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana.

Date:

City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
City Council 23 – 110 4/2/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Exhibit A
City Council 23 – 111 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
2024-01 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW A DRIVE-THROUGH
FACILITY FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2101 AND 2109
E. SANTA CLARA AVENUE, COLLECTIVELY KNOWN AS 2101 E.

SANTA CLARA AVENUE (APN: 396-261-26 AND 396-261-38)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows:

A. Donald Ellis with Stream Realty Partners (applicant), representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (property owner) is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2024-01 to allow drive-through window service for an eating establishment in the Arterial Commercial (C5) zoning district at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue, collectively known as 2101 E.

Santa Clara Avenue.

B. Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41-424.5(e) requires approval of a CUP for eating establishments with drive-through window service.

C. Pursuant to SAMC Section 41-638, the Planning Commission is authorized to review and approve the CUP for this project as set forth by the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

D. On February 26, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for CUP No. 2024-01.

E. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana has considered the information and determines that the following findings, which must be established in order to grant CUP No. 2024-01, for drive-through window service, have been established as required by SAMC Section 41-638.

1. That the proposed use will provide a service or facility, which will contribute to the general wellbeing of the neighborhood or community.

The eating establishment with drive-through window service will provide a service to persons that are working or residing in the area. The project will redevelop underutilized lots with a new eating establishment with a contemporary design that includes
neutral/dark color palette and tones along the outer facades, which would involve materials such as plaster/stucco, aluminum, and City Council 23 – 112 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

metals. The project will include aesthetically pleasing features, such as landscaping with a variety of plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and groundcover. Landscaped planter areas will be constructed along the northern, western, and southern site perimeter and would provide decorative screening and a buffer between the proposed uses and the adjacent uses, in addition to being placed centrally within the surface parking lot and adjacent to the drive-through.

2. That the proposed use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity.

The drive-through will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of those residing or working in the vicinity. The drivethrough was designed and intended to generate the least amount of community impacts as possible. An analysis of the site access and site circulation determined that the site plan provides adequate spaces for vehicles to maneuver through the project site and drivethrough. In addition, a drive-through evaluation was provided which was intended to determine if the circulation plan provides adequate on-site drive-through storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site vehicle demands. The analysis determined that the dual drive-through lanes exceed the City’s stacking requirements and will allow for a storage capacity of approximately 16 cars, which is sufficient capacity to accommodate average and peak vehicle demands for the project without disrupting drive aisles or on-site parking spaces.

The drive-through operation is also designed to generate minimal noise impacts as the speaker boards are located towards the rear of the site (north elevation), away from the closest residential units, and are oriented towards the existing shopping center. Any potential noise generated from the idling of vehicles or the drivethrough speakers will not impact the closest residential uses as they are approximately 250 feet away to the south. The site has been designed to include a large landscape area which will help buffer light and noise impacts to the residential uses. Moreover, the site design will include 24-inch box trees and large shrubs planted along the southern property line to create a visual buffer between the drive-through lanes.

3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area.

The drive-through will not adversely affect the economic stability or future economic development of properties in the surrounding City Council 23 – 113 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

area. The site is currently underutilized and occupied by vacant single-family residences, and the new building will establish a commercial use of the property. An eating establishment with drive-through service will provide an additional service and eating opportunities for the area and will provide a commercial business that generates sales tax revenue for the City. In addition, the McDonald’s will generate new and permanent employment opportunities in favor of the economic growth and stability of the City.

4. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use.

The use complies with the regulations and conditions in Chapter 41 including building heights, yards, parking and landscaping. A condition of approval has been added to the conditional use permit for a property maintenance agreement to be recorded against the property, which will ensure that the property and all improvements are properly maintained.

5. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the General Plan of the city or any specific plan applicable to the area of the proposed use.

The approval of the project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC). The project would provide an added amenity to the existing commercial shopping center and would promote a land use that enhances the City’s economic fiscal viability and mitigates any potential impacts to the surrounding community. The after-hours operations will contribute to the viability of the site creating a business environment that is safe and attractive. Moreover, the project has been designed to be consistent with several goals and policies of the General Plan as discussed below.
• Goal LU-2: Land Use Needs – Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana’s diverse needs
o Policy 2.2 Capture Local Spending – Encourage
a range of commercial uses to capture a greater
share of local spending and offer a range of
employment opportunities.
o Policy 2.6 Encourage Investment – Promote
rehabilitation of properties and encourage
increased levels of capital investment to create a
safe and attractive environment.
o Policy 2.7 Business Incubator – Support land use
decisions that encourage the creation,
development, and retention of business in Santa
Ana
City Council 23 – 114 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

The project is consistent with Goal LU-2 and Policies 2.2, 2.6, and

2.7, as it will allow for additional service to Santa Ana residents and visitors, thereby positively contributing to the economic viability of the area by promoting local spending, offering employment opportunities, and providing a safe workplace. In addition, the applicant is making an investment to rehabilitate the site to allow for a safe and attractive establishment by expanding the commercial center and improving the circulation throughout.

Lastly, the project would also preserve the character of the existing commercial area and promotes the rehabilitation of properties by proposing to remove a blighted and underutilized land use to create a safe and attractive environment.
• Goal LU-3: Compatibility of Uses – Preserve and
improve the character and integrity of existing
neighborhoods and districts.
o Policy 3.4 Compatible Development – Ensure
that the scale and massing of new development
is compatible and harmonious with the
surrounding built environment.
o Policy 3.7 Attractive Environment – Promote a
clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa
Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.

The project is consistent with Goal LU-3 and Policies 3.4 and 3.7, as the improvements would preserve the character of the existing commercial area. The scale and massing of the new project is compatible with the existing commercial center, as consideration was given to scale, massing, and architecture of the project to ensure that it complements the existing buildings within the surrounding development. Moreover, the project would include aesthetically pleasing features, such as landscaping with a variety of plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and groundcover, which would further help enhanced the viability of the commercial center, would create a harmonious environment, and would help promote a clean and safe environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.
• Goal EP-1: Job Creation and Retention – Foster a
dynamic local economy that provides and create
employment opportunities for all residents in the City. o Policy 1.2 Attract Business – Promote new and
retain existing job-producing businesses that
provide living-wage employment opportunities.

The project is consistent with Goal EP-1 and Policy 1.2, as the City Council 23 – 115 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

improvements would help generate additional economic growth and stability in the City by further activating underutilized parcels and helping generate property and sales tax revenue.

Furthermore, the project would help create a job-producing establishment thereby providing employment opportunities to Santa Ana residents.
• Goal EP-3: Business Friendly Environment – Promote a
business friendly environment where businesses thrive
and build on Santa Ana’s strengths and opportunities.
o Policy 3.7 Facilitating Investment – Promote a
solution-based customer focus in order to
facilitate additional development and investment
in the community.
o Policy 3.8 Comprehensive Analysis of Land Use
– Pursue a balance of fiscal and qualitative
community benefits when making land use
decisions.

The project would be consistent with Goal EP-3 and Policies 3.7 and 3.8, as it provides for redevelopment of existing underutilized single-family residences and promotes a new eating establishment that would provide services to the community. Moreover, the project would help create a friendly business environment and help the overall commercial center to enhance their business offerings and compete with nearby commercial centers. Lastly, by working on an improved site design with the applicant, staff ensured that that project provided a high level of community investment for residents, workers, and visitors in the area.

Section 2. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Section 21000 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code) and in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq. of the California Code of Regulations), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project. The purpose of the IS/MND is to describe the project and to provide an evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with the project’s construction and operation.

Moreover, the IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts of project implementation; includes significance determinations from the environmental analyses; identifies regulatory requirements to be incorporated into the project; and sets forth mitigation measures that will lessen or avoid potentially significant project impacts on the environment.

The IS/MND determined that the proposed project would have no impact, or less than significant impacts with mitigation measures, in all topics outlined in the CEQA Environmental Checklist.

Possible impacts identified in the IS/MND include those related to Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. With implementation of mitigation measures (MM) listed below, all potential impacts would be less than significant.

City Council 23 – 116 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

• MM CUL-1: Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the Applicant shall retain an Orange County-certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary. • MM GEO-1: Prior to commencement earthmoving activities, the Applicant shall retain a qualified Orange County-certified Paleontologist for on-call services in the event of a discovery of paleontologically sensitive rock formations during ground disturbance activities.
• MM HAZ-1: Any additional materials discovered during demolition activities shall be collected and analyzed prior to removal or disturbance of materials. • MM HAZ-2: Prior to demolition, all asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and asbestos containing construction materials (ACCMs) shall be removed from the structures at the Project site.
• MM TCR-1: Prior to commencement of ground disturbing activities, the Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor.
• MM TCR-2: Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resource Objects, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity shall cease.
• MM TCR-3: Upon discovery of any human remains and associated funerary or ceremonial objects, actions pursuant to Public Resource Code 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code 7050.5 shall occur.

The IS/MND’s analysis determined that the above-mentioned environmental categories would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of the enforceable mitigation measures, that would be adopted by the City.

Historic or Cultural Significance
Two built environment resources over 45 years old were identified within the project site: 2101 and 2109 Santa Clara Avenue. The properties were recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Forms in consideration of California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and local City designation criteria and integrity requirements. Both properties were found not eligible under all state and local designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit. No historical resources were identified within the project site as a result of this study. Therefore, with respect to built environment resources, the project will have a less than significant impact on historical resources under CEQA.

Traffic Impacts
The project specific Transportation Analysis conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis to determine the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection, including at the intersection of the Driveway 1 (located along Santa Clara Avenue) and Santa Clara Avenue, and the intersection between Tustin Avenue and Driveway 2 (located along Tustin Avenue).

As concluded by the Transportation Analysis, the addition of project traffic would not trigger the City of Santa Ana’s significance criteria, and no traffic signal is warranted for either intersection.

In addition, the Transportation Analysis performed a drive-through analysis to determine if the proposed circulation plan provided adequate on-site drive-through storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site vehicle demand. Ultimately, the drive-through analysis City Council 23 – 117 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

suggested that the project would provide stacking accommodations for approximately 16 vehicles within the drive-through, and there would be sufficient capacity to accommodate average and peak vehicle demands for the project.

The IS/MND’s Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024. The NOI was also mailed out to all properties within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. The IS/MND was made available for public view at the City Hall Planning counter, Santa Ana Library in the Civic Center and on the City website. As of this printing, no comments or communications from the public have been received on the IS/MND. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-16 will be filed for this project.

Section 3. This Resolution shall not be effective unless and until the City Council Ordinance for Amendment Application No. 2024-01 is adopted and become effective. If said ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or otherwise does not go into effect for any reason, then this Resolution shall be null and void and have no further force and effect.

Section 4. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively “Actions”), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the SubdivisionMap Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action.

Section 5. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-01, as conditioned in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for the project located at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue, collectively known as 2101 E. Santa Clara Avenue. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above-referenced hearing, including but not limited to: The Request for Planning Commission Action dated February 26, 2024, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

City Council 23 – 118 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

ADOPTED this 26th day of February 2024 by the following vote.

AYES: Commissioners:

NOES: Commissioners:

ABSENT: Commissioners:

ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners:

Bao Pham
Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:

Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2024-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on February 26, 2024.

Date:

Nuvia Ocampo
Recording Secretary
City of Santa Ana
City Council 23 – 119 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-01 Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) No. 2024-01 for drive-through window service is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, they shall meet the following conditions of approval:

The Applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit.

1. The Applicant must comply with all conditions and requirements of the Development Review Committee for the Development Project (DP) No. 2022-06.

2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or if the conditional use permit must be amended.

3. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan for the entire site to the Planning Division for review and approval. The landscape and irrigation shall comply with the zoning district's landscape standards, the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO), and the Citywide Design Guidelines. The landscape plan shall also include block wall details, and note application of anti-graffiti coating.

4. All landscaping shall be installed per the approved landscape and irrigation plan. In addition, all landscaping shall be evergreen, be required to be maintained throughout the lifetime of the CUP, and shall be required to be maintained in a healthy manner.

Moreover, any unhealthy or dead landscaping shall be required to be removed and replaced in-kind.

5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall construct a new minimum six-foot decorative block wall along the western property line with anti-graffiti coating and a flat wall cap, or resurface the existing block wall with smooth stucco, anti-graffiti coating and a flat wall cap. In no case shall a double-wall be constructed or permitted along any property line.

6. Decorative pavers, or an acceptable alternative design deemed appropriate by Planning Division staff, shall be required to be installed at all driveways of the existing commercial shopping center, including existing and proposed, and any subject to reciprocal access agreements with the subject property.

7. At any time that vehicle stacking extends beyond the entrance to the drive through facility, the restaurant shall provide field staff as reasonably required to expedite drivethrough operations, assist with onsite parking, and prevent vehicles from blocking City Council 23 – 120 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

onsite parking spaces, drive aisles, the ingress and egress easement onto adjacent properties, and/or queuing onto Bristol Street. A stacking plan illustrating vehicle stacking management in parking areas shall be posted and maintained onsite.

8. Violations of the Conditional Use Permit as contained in Section 41-647.5 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code will be grounds for permit suspension and/or revocation as described in Section 41-651 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

9. The business shall post in a conspicuous location at the entry to the building the contact information for the responsible onsite manager, including full name, phone number, and emergency or backup phone number, in case of noise and related operational complaints.

10. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a Property Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded against the property. The agreement will be subject to review and applicability by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, the Public Works Agency, and the City Attorney to ensure that the property and all improvements located thereupon are properly maintained. Applicant (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Applicant) shall execute a maintenance agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The maintenance agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following:
a. Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measure; adherence to approved project phasing etc.); b. Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements andrestrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the parking management plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses);
c. Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs, as applicable;
d. Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris on or about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and/or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable);
City Council 23 – 121 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

e. If Applicant and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the Applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the Applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the maintenance agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms;
f. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terms shall not assign its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties, obligations and responsibilities set forth under the maintenance agreement; g. The maintenance agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lien upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and/or expense incurred by the City; and h. The execution and recordation of the maintenance agreement shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of final approval for any construction permit related to this entitlement.

City Council 23 – 122 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
2024-02 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW AFTER-HOURS (24-

HOUR) OPERATION FOR AN EATING ESTABLISHMENT
LOCATED AT 2101 AND 2109 E. SANTA CLARA AVENUE,
COLLECTIVELY KNOWN AS 2101 E. SANTA CLARA AVENUE
(APN: 396-261-26 AND 396-261-38)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows:

A. Donald Ellis with Stream Realty Partners (applicant), representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (property owner) is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2024-02 to allow after-hours operations (24-hours) for an eating establishment in the Arterial Commercial (C5) zoning district at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue, collectively known as 2101 E. Santa Clara Avenue.

B. Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41-424.5 (j) requires approval of a CUP for eating establishments open at any time between the hours of 12:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. and located within one hundred fifty (150) feet of residentially zoned or used property.

C. Pursuant to SAMC Section 41-638, the Planning Commission is authorized to review and approve the CUP for this project as set forth by the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

D. On February 26, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for CUP No. 2024-02.

E. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana has considered the information and determines that following findings, which must be established in order to grant CUP No. 2024-02, to operate between the hours of 12:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. within one hundred fifty (150) feet of residentially zoned and used property, have been established as required by SAMC Section 41-638:

1. That the proposed use will provide a service or facility, which will contribute to the general wellbeing of the neighborhood or community.

The eating establishment with 24-hour operations will provide a service to persons that are working or residing in the area. The project will redevelop underutilized lots with a new eating City Council 23 – 123 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

establishment with a contemporary design that includes
neutral/dark color palette and tones along the outer facades, which would involve materials such as plaster/stucco, aluminum, and metals. The project would include aesthetically pleasing features, such as landscaping with a variety of plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and groundcover. Landscaped planter areas would be constructed along the northern, western, and southern site perimeter and would provide decorative screening and a buffer between the uses and the adjacent uses, in addition to being placed centrally within the surface parking lot and adjacent to the drive-through.

2. That the proposed use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity.

The drive-through will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of those residing or working in the vicinity. The 24-hour operations would not generate additional community impacts and would have minimal to no impacts to the adjacent residences as it relates to lighting. This is due to the location of the building and drive-through and the separation distance to existing residential units as described above. Specifically, the project site is in an area that is already subject to significant ambient lighting (e.g., exterior building lights, parking lot pole lights, interior building lights, streetlights, etc.) from the existing commercial/retail uses surrounding the site. The project would involve new streetlights and additional exterior and interior building lighting associated with the operation of the McDonald’s. However, all lighting would be subject to the City’s design guidelines, which outlines lighting standards for commercial projects and includes direction on minimizing glare onto adjoining properties. Moreover, all on-site lighting would be shielded and directed so that no lighting trespasses onto the adjacent properties. The lighting levels for the site would not be altered and would be consistent with the ambient and night-time lighting at the commercial uses surrounding the site.

Lastly, the site plan has been designed so that vehicle headlights would not create lighting concerns to the residential units to the south. Specifically, the building and drive-through have been offset so that the pick-up window is not aligned directly with any residential windows. In addition, the project will incorporate a landscape buffer with various mature landscaping (shrubs, trees, and groundcover) along Santa Clara Avenue. Staff is
recommending a condition of approval that the mature landscaping be evergreen, be required to be maintained throughout the lifetime of the CUP, that it be maintained healthy, and that any unhealthy or dead plants be required to be removed and replaced in-kind.

City Council 23 – 124 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

The 24-hour drive-through operations would also have minimal to no impacts to the adjacent residences as it relates to noise. The overall operations would not generate noise levels above the maximum acceptable noise levels outlined in the City’s Noise Ordinance, as shown in Table 3 below. The daily operation of the eating establishment has the potential to result in an increased ambient noise level in the immediate vicinity of the site through the addition of stationary sources of noise as well as vehicular trips associated with the project. These stationary sources of noise include HVAC equipment, landscape maintenance equipment, parking lot activities, trash collection activities, and restaurant drive-through speakers. Noise associated with the parking lot activities consists of vehicle engines, door slams, engine starts, and people talking. However, the stationary sources during the times of 1:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. would be limited to just the drivethrough operations as the indoor dining area would be closed during this time. These noise sources include the drive-through window and a menu board with an amplified speaker, in addition to non-amplified speech.

3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area.

The drive-through will not adversely affect the economic stability or future economic development of properties in the surrounding area. The site is currently underutilized and occupied by vacant single-family residences, and the new building will establish a commercial use of the property. An eating establishment with after-hours service will provide an additional service and eating opportunities for the area and will provide a commercial business that generates sales tax revenue for the City. In addition, the McDonald’s will generate new and permanent employment
opportunities in favor of the economic growth and stability of the City.

4. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use.

The use complies with the regulations and conditions in Chapter 41 including building heights, yards, parking and landscaping. A condition of approval has been added to the conditional use permit for a property maintenance agreement to be recorded against the property, which will ensure that the property and all improvements are properly maintained.

5. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the General Plan of the city or any specific plan applicable to the area of the proposed use.

City Council 23 – 125 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

The approval of the project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of General Commercial (GC). The project would provide an added amenity to the existing commercial shopping center and would promote a land use that enhances the City’s economic fiscal viability and mitigates any potential impacts to the surrounding community. The after-hours operations will contribute to the viability of the site creating a business environment that is safe and attractive. Moreover, the project has been designed to be consistent with several goals and policies of the General Plan as discussed below.
• Goal LU-2: Land Use Needs – Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana’s diverse needs
o Policy 2.2 Capture Local Spending – Encourage
a range of commercial uses to capture a greater
share of local spending and offer a range of
employment opportunities.
o Policy 2.6 Encourage Investment – Promote
rehabilitation of properties and encourage
increased levels of capital investment to create a
safe and attractive environment.
o Policy 2.7 Business Incubator – Support land use
decisions that encourage the creation,
development, and retention of business in Santa
Ana
The project is consistent with Goal LU-2 and Policies 2.2, 2.6, and

2.7, as it will allow for additional service to Santa Ana residents and visitors, thereby positively contributing to the economic viability of the area by promoting local spending, offering employment opportunities, and providing a safe workplace. In addition, the applicant is making an investment to rehabilitate the site to allow for a safe and attractive establishment by expanding the commercial center and improving the circulation throughout.

Lastly, the project would also preserve the character of the existing commercial area and promotes the rehabilitation of properties by proposing to remove a blighted and underutilized land use to create a safe and attractive environment.
• Goal LU-3: Compatibility of Uses – Preserve and
improve the character and integrity of existing
neighborhoods and districts.
o Policy 3.4 Compatible Development – Ensure
that the scale and massing of new development
is compatible and harmonious with the
surrounding built environment.
o Policy 3.7 Attractive Environment – Promote a
City Council 23 – 126 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa
Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.

The project is consistent with Goal LU-3 and Policies 3.4 and 3.7, as the improvements would preserve the character of the existing commercial area. The scale and massing of the new project is to be compatible with the existing commercial center, as
consideration was given to scale, massing, and architecture of the project to ensure that it complements the existing buildings within the surrounding development. Moreover, the project would include aesthetically pleasing features, such as landscaping with a variety of plant materials including trees, shrubs, vines, grasses, and groundcover, which would further help enhanced the viability of the commercial center, would create a harmonious environment, and would help promote a clean and safe environment for Santa Ana’s residents, workers, and visitors.
• Goal EP-1: Job Creation and Retention – Foster a
dynamic local economy that provides and create
employment opportunities for all residents in the City. o Policy 1.2 Attract Business – Promote new and
retain existing job-producing businesses that
provide living-wage employment opportunities.

The project is consistent with Goal EP-1 and Policy 1.2, as the improvements would help generate additional economic growth and stability in the City by further activating underutilized parcels and helping generate property and sales tax revenue.

Furthermore, the project would help create a job-producing establishment thereby providing employment opportunities to Santa Ana residents.
• Goal EP-3: Business Friendly Environment – Promote a
business friendly environment where businesses thrive
and build on Santa Ana’s strengths and opportunities.
o Policy 3.7 Facilitating Investment – Promote a
solution-based customer focus in order to
facilitate additional development and investment
in the community.
o Policy 3.8 Comprehensive Analysis of Land Use
– Pursue a balance of fiscal and qualitative
community benefits when making land use
decisions.

The project would be consistent with Goal EP-3 and Policies 3.7 and 3.8, as it provides for redevelopment of existing underutilized single-family residences and promotes a new eating establishment City Council 23 – 127 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

that would provide services to the community. Moreover, the project would help create a friendly business environment and help the overall commercial center to enhance their business offerings and compete with nearby commercial centers. Lastly, by working on an improved site design with the applicant, staff ensured that that project provided a high level of community investment for residents, workers, and visitors in the area.

Section 2. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Section 21000 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code) and in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq. of the California Code of Regulations), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project. The purpose of the IS/MND is to describe the proposed project and to provide an evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with the project’s construction and operation. Moreover, the IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts of project implementation; includes significance determinations from the environmental analyses; identifies regulatory requirements to be incorporated into the project; and sets forth mitigation measures that will lessen or avoid potentially significant project impacts on the environment.

The IS/MND determined that the proposed project would have no impact, or less than significant impacts with mitigation measures, in all topics outlined in the CEQA Environmental Checklist.

Possible impacts identified in the IS/MND include those related to Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. With implementation of mitigation measures (MM) listed below, all potential impacts would be less than significant.
• MM CUL-1: Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the Applicant shall retain an Orange County-certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary. • MM GEO-1: Prior to commencement earthmoving activities, the Applicant shall retain a qualified Orange County-certified Paleontologist for on-call services in the event of a discovery of paleontologically sensitive rock formations during ground disturbance activities.
• MM HAZ-1: Any additional materials discovered during demolition activities shall be collected and analyzed prior to removal or disturbance of materials. • MM HAZ-2: Prior to demolition, all asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and asbestos containing construction materials (ACCMs) shall be removed from the structures at the Project site.
• MM TCR-1: Prior to commencement of ground disturbing activities, the Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor.
• MM TCR-2: Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resource Objects, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity shall cease.
• MM TCR-3: Upon discovery of any human remains and associated funerary or ceremonial objects, actions pursuant to Public Resource Code 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code 7050.5 shall occur.

The IS/MND’s analysis determined that the above-mentioned environmental categories would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of the enforceable City Council 23 – 128 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

mitigation measures, that would be adopted by the City.

Historic or Cultural Significance
Two built environment resources over 45 years old were identified within the project site: 2101 and 2109 Santa Clara Avenue. The properties were recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Forms in consideration of California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and local City designation criteria and integrity requirements. Both properties were found not eligible under all state and local designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit. No historical resources were identified within the project site as a result of this study. Therefore, with respect to built environment resources, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact on historical resources under CEQA.

Traffic Impacts
The project specific Transportation Analysis conducted a traffic signal warrant analysis to determine the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection, including at the intersection of the Driveway 1 (located along Santa Clara Avenue) and Santa Clara Avenue, and the intersection between Tustin Avenue and Driveway 2 (located along Tustin Avenue).

As concluded by the Transportation Analysis, the addition of project traffic would not trigger the City of Santa Ana’s significance criteria, and no traffic signal is warranted for either intersection.

In addition, the Transportation Analysis performed a drive-through analysis to determine if the proposed circulation plan provided adequate on-site drive-through storage capacity to accommodate the peak on-site vehicle demand. Ultimately, the drive-through analysis suggested that the project would provide stacking accommodations for approximately 16 vehicles within the drive-through, and there would be sufficient capacity to accommodate average and peak vehicle demands for the proposed project.

The IS/MND’s Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024. The NOI was also mailed out to all properties within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. The IS/MND was made available for public view at the City Hall Planning counter, Santa Ana Library in the Civic Center and on the City website. As of this printing, no comments or communications from the public have been received on the IS/MND. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-16 will be filed for this project.

Section 3. This Resolution shall not be effective unless and until the City Council Ordinance for Amendment Application No. 2024-01 is adopted and become effective. If said ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or otherwise does not go into effect for any reason, then this Resolution shall be null and void and have no further force and effect.

Section 4. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, City Council 23 – 129 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively “Actions”), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the SubdivisionMap Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action.

Section 5. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-02, as conditioned in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for the project located at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue, collectively known as 2101 E. Santa Clara Avenue. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above-referenced hearing, including but not limited to: The Request for Planning Commission Action dated February 26, 2024, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

ADOPTED this 26th day of February 2024 by the following vote.

AYES: Commissioners:

NOES: Commissioners:

ABSENT: Commissioners:

ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners:

Bao Pham
Chairperson
City Council 23 – 130 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:

Laura A. Rossini
Chief Assistant City Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2024-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on February 26, 2024.

Date:

Nuvia Ocampo
Recording Secretary
City of Santa Ana
City Council 23 – 131 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

EXHIBIT A
Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2024-02 Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) No. 2024-02 for after-hours operations (24-hours) is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, they shall meet the following conditions of approval:

The Applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit.

1. The Applicant must comply with all conditions and requirements of the Development Review Committee for the Development Project (DP) No. 2022-06.

2. Any amendment to this conditional use permit must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or if the conditional use permit must be amended.

3. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan for the entire site to the Planning Division for review and approval. The landscape and irrigation shall comply with the zoning district's landscape standards, the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO), and the Citywide Design Guidelines. The landscape plan shall also include block wall details, and note application of anti-graffiti coating.

4. All landscaping shall be installed per the approved landscape and irrigation plan. In addition, all landscaping shall be evergreen, be required to be maintained throughout the lifetime of the CUP, and shall be required to be maintained in a healthy manner.

Moreover, any unhealthy or dead landscaping shall be required to be removed and replaced in-kind.

5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall construct a new minimum six-foot decorative block wall along the western property line with anti-graffiti coating and a flat wall cap, or resurface the existing block wall with smooth stucco, anti-graffiti coating and a flat wall cap. In no case shall a double-wall be constructed or permitted along any property line.

6. Decorative pavers, or an acceptable alternative determined by Planning Division staff, shall be required to be installed at all driveways of the existing commercial shopping center, including existing and proposed, and any subject to reciprocal access agreements with the subject property.

7. At any time that vehicle stacking extends beyond the entrance to the drive through facility, the restaurant shall provide field staff as reasonably required to expedite drivethrough operations, assist with onsite parking, and prevent vehicles from blocking City Council 23 – 132 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

onsite parking spaces, drive aisles, the ingress and egress easement onto adjacent properties, and/or queuing onto Bristol Street. A stacking plan illustrating vehicle stacking management in parking areas shall be posted and maintained onsite.

8. Violations of the Conditional Use Permit as contained in Section 41-647.5 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code will be grounds for permit suspension and/or revocation as described in Section 41-651 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

9. The business shall post in a conspicuous location at the entry to the building the contact information for the responsible onsite manager, including full name, phone number, and emergency or backup phone number, in case of noise and related operational complaints.

10. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a Property Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded against the property. The agreement will be subject to review and applicability by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, the Public Works Agency, and the City Attorney to ensure that the property and all improvements located thereupon are properly maintained. Applicant (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Applicant) shall execute a maintenance agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The maintenance agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following:
a. Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measure; adherence to approved project phasing etc.); b. Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements and restrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the parking management plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses);
c. Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs, as applicable;
d. Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris on or about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and/or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable);
City Council 23 – 133 4/2/2024
Resolution No. 2024-XXX

e. If Applicant and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the Applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the Applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the maintenance agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms;
f. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terms shall not assign its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties, obligations and responsibilities set forth under the maintenance agreement; g. The maintenance agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lien upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and/or expense incurred by the City; and h. The execution and recordation of the maintenance agreement shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of final approval for any construction permit related to this entitlement.

City Council 23 – 134 4/2/2024










 
!
 
"#$%&%'(&)*"#$%&%'(&%*+,-..%&%'(&)*/012,+3-456758+9:+,8 %)&)+,-%)&;<=>+,8+"3+:+.?7,97
<@ABCB8'(DB0B,B8E+,-.7:B+3DB7F
GHIHJKLMLNOPQORSTUVWXNYZ[PPTLM\NYT]Y]T^]VZ
_O`NO[`OaUW`VOTb
cU`L`M
dIIe]]N
City Council 23 – 135 4/2/2024
2101 E. Santa Clara Avenue
2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue
AA No. 2024-01, CUP No. 2024-01, and CUP No. 2024-02
McDonald's Restaurant at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue Exhibit 5 – Site Photos
City Council 23 – 136 4/2/2024

ADJACENT

RESTAURANT
1 STORY STUCCO BUILDING
“6)
%8,/',1*+(,*+7
“


ADJACENT RETAIL
1 STORY BRICK BUILDING
“6)
%8,/',1*+(,*+7
“


ADJACENT

RESIDENTIAL

E SANTA CLARA AVE
5 9
M.O. M.O. 105' TO DT CANOPY
12 PATIO
6 McDONALD'S
(4587
PROTO)
“
6)

PROPOSED

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS

PROPOSED

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS
TE
20'-2" x
14'-11"

ENHANCED DECORATIVE
PAVING, TYP.
147' FROM THE

PICK-UP WINDOW TO

THE ORDER
POINT
113' FROM THE FROM

THE ORDER POINT TO

THE END OF THE

DRIVE-THROUGH
LANE

ENHANCED

DRIVEWAY

BIKE RACK CAV EV
SIGHT-DISTANCETRIANGLE AREA

STAGING

AREA CAV EV
TE

CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT:

SITE INFORMATION
APN:

SITE AREA OF PROJECT SCOPE:

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION:

CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT:

BUILDING INFORMATION
OCCUPANCY TYPE:

TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:

PROPOSED USE:

PARKING INFORMATION
PARKING REQUIREMENT:

STALLS REQUIRED:

STALLS PROVIDED:

STREAM REALTY
3161 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 100
IRVINE, CA 92612
CONTACT: MICHAEL GREGG
TEL: (805) 215-6453
EMAIL: [email protected]
396-261-38
35,400 SF (0.81 AC)
C2 - GENERAL COMMERCIAL
A1 - GENERAL AGRICULTURAL
(SURROUNDING LOTS ZONED AT C5)
A-2

TYPE VB - SPRINKLERED

RESTAURANT
8 SPACES PER 1,000 SF OF GFA
32 STALLS
32 STALLS
LEGEND:
2109 E SANTA CLARA AVENUE

SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA

SITE PLAN
Scale: 1" = 20'
October 27, 2022
P:\21\21730 - McD Santa Ana, 2109 E Santa Clara Ave
(004-5088)\Design\Site\x21730 - Site Plan.dwg

B I C K E L G R O U P

A R C H I T E C T U R E

BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED
3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120
N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0
P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511
w w w . b i c k e l g r p . c o m NORTH

TRASH ENCLOSURE

LANDSCAPE AREA

PROPERTY LINE PER ALTA
150' HOSE PULL DISTANCE

S FIRE HYDRANT

WATER VALVE

GAS VALVE

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

STREET SIGN

UTILITY POLE

EXISTING BOLLARD
NOTES:

1. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS:

ALL IMPROVEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER AND/OR THE DEVELOPER EXPENSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND THE APPROVED STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS. $//75$)),&,03$&7$1$/<6,6
7,$
5(&200(1'$7,21
6 :,//%(,03/(0(17('35,25727+(%8,/',1*3(50,762/(/<$77+('(9(/23(5·6 EXPENSE.

City Council 23 – 137 4/2/2024

SUPPORT

FREEZER/
COOLER
CREW
ROOM

ORDER PRESENTER PRESENTER

KITCHEN

CUSTOMER

SERVICE

WOMEN'S
MEN'S
J.C.

BABY

CHANGING
ROOM

SWITCHGEAR
FIRE
RISER
HB
3 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVENUE

SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA

FLOOR & ROOF
PLANS
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"
October 7, 2022
P:\21\21730 - McD Santa Ana, 2109 E Santa Clara Ave
(004-5088)\Design\Floor Plan\x21730 - Floor Plan.dwg

B I C K E L G R O U P

A R C H I T E C T U R E

BIC K E L GR O U P IN C O RPO RAT ED
3600 BIR C H S TRE E T, S U IT E 120
N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0
P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511
w w w . b i c k e l g r p . c o m

FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
City Council 23 – 138 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 139 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 140 4/2/2024
STOP A75 A76 A77 A78 A79 A80 A81 A82 A74 A73 A70 A71 A72 A69 A68 A67 A66 A65 A64 A63 A62 A61 A60 McDONALD'S
(4587 PROTO)
±3,975 SF

E SANTA CLARA AVENUE
(PUBLIC R.O.W.) CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/EV

ONE WAY DO NOT ENTER CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/EV

ADJACENT RETAIL PROPERTY ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL/ COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ADJACENT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY

TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT
CD2 9 CERCIDIUM X 'DESERT MUSEUM' / DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE 24" BOX EF 4 EUCALYPTUS FICIFOLIA / RED FLOWERING GUM 15 GAL.

KP 5 KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA / GOLDEN RAIN TREE 36" BOX RS 7 RHUS LANCEA / AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX

EXISTING TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT
XE2 17 EXISTING TREE / TO BE REMOVED - SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT.

AS 27 AGAVE ATTENUATA 'SUPER NOVA' / SUPER NOVA FOXTAIL AGAVE 5 GAL.

AP 26 ARTEMISIA X 'POWIS CASTLE' / POWIS CASTLE ARTEMISIA 5 GAL.

BB 17 BOUTELOUA GRACILIS 'BLONDE AMBITION' / BLONDE AMBITION BLUE GRAMA 1 GAL.

CD 58 CAREX DIVULSA / EUROPEAN GREY SEDGE 5 GAL.

CT 163 CAREX TUMULICOLA / FOOTHILL SEDGE 1 GAL.

CM 47 CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA / DAMIANITA 1 GAL.

DB 4 DIETES BICOLOR / FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL.

HB 50 HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 'PERPA' / BRAKELIGHTSŠ RED YUCCA 5 GAL.

MC 105 MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS / PINK MUHLY GRASS 5 GAL.

MR2 127 MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA / PINE MUHLY 5 GAL.

MR 23 MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEER GRASS 5 GAL.

SG2 24 SALVIA GREGGII / AUTUMN SAGE 5 GAL.

SCREENING SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT.

JS2 5 JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM 'SKYROCKET' / SKYROCKET JUNIPER 15 GAL.

LC 62 LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'COMPACTA' / COMPACT TEXAS SAGE 5 GAL.

VINES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT.

TG 9 THUNBERGIA GREGORII / ORANGE CLOCK VINE 5 GAL.

GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT.

BP 32 BACCHARIS PILULARIS 'PIGEON POINT' / PIGEON POINT COYOTE BRUSH 1 GAL.

SC 173 SANTOLINA CHAMAECYPARISSUS / LAVENDER COTTON 1 GAL.

TN 184 TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS 'NANUM' / CREEPING GERMANDER 1 GAL.

PLANT SCHEDULE
-WUCOLS
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

MODERATE
LOW
LOW
LOW
WUCOLS
LOW
LOW
WUCOLS

MODERATE
WUCOLS
LOW
LOW
LOW
WUCOLS
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
WUCOLS

REFERENCES

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY

REVISIONS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0
NORTH
LANDSCAPE NOTE:

THE SELECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS BASED ON CLIMATIC, AESTHETIC, AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED WITH

APPROPRIATE SOIL AMENDMENTS, FERTILIZERS AND APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTS

BASED UPON A SOILS REPORT FROM AN AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY SOIL SAMPLE TAKEN FROM THE SITE. MULCH SHALL FILL IN BETWEEN SHRUBS TO SHIELD THE SOIL FROM THE SUN, EVAPOTRANSPIRATION, AND RUN-OFF. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED TO A 3" DEPTH TO HELP CONSERVE WATER, LOWER SOIL TEMPERATURE, AND REDUCE WEED GROWTH. THE SHRUBS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO GROW IN THEIR NATURAL FORMS. ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE.

IRRIGATION NOTE:

AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE 100% COVERAGE FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE WATER SUPPLY FOR THIS SITE IS

A POTABLE WATER CONNECTION AND A DEDICATED IRRIGATION METER WILL BE PROVIDED. LOW VOLUME EQUIPMENT SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT WATER FOR PLANT

GROWTH WITH NO WATER LOSS DUE TO WATER CONTROLLERS, AND OTHER NECESSARY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. ALL POINT SOURCE SYSTEM SHALL BE

ADEQUATELY FILTERED AND REGULATED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED DESIGN PARAMETERS. ALL IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE.

I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AB-1881 AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN. ________________ MATTHEW DURHAM, LLA 4840

EXISTING

OVERHEAD

LINES (TYP)

BIKE RACKS -

BY OTHERS (TYP)

DRIVE-THRU

EQUIPMENT (TYP)

EXISTING TREE -

TO BE REMOVED (TYP)

LANDSCAPE

LIMIT-OF-WORK

LINE (TYP)

PROPOSED

PROPERTY

LINE (TYP)
1' CONCRETE

STRIP (TYP)

TRASH ENCLOSURE
- BY OTHERS

MULCH (TYP)

PROPOSED LIGHT POLE -

SEE CIVIL SHEETS (TYP)

PROPOSED UTIL -

SEE CIVIL SHEETS
(TYP)

WALK (TYP)

SUBSURFACE

STORMWATER

RETENTION

SYSTEM -

SEE CIVIL
SHEETS
FUTURE E.V.

CHARGING

STATION

PROPERTY

LINE (TYP)

WALK (TYP)

EXISTING

WALK (TYP)

WALK (TYP)

DRIVE-THRU

EQUIPMENT (TYP)

EXISITNG APRON

LANDSCAPE

SETBACK LINE (TYP)
SAWCUT

LINE (TYP)
LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATIONS:

TOTAL SITE AREA: 36,538 SQFT
TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: 8,604 SQFT
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE: 23.5%
City Council 23 – 141 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 142 4/2/2024
EXHIBIT 10
The McDonald’s at Santa Clara Avenue Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), Technical Appendices, and Response to Comments (RTC) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) may be accessed at:

Santa Ana City Hall Planning Counter, First Floor
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
or
Santa Ana Main Library
26 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
or
https://www.santa-ana.org/mcdonalds-drive-through-restaurant/ City Council 23 – 143 4/2/2024
From: Michael Gregg
To: Martin, Eric
Subject: 2101 Santa Clara Ave Sana Ana - McDonald"s - Community Meeting Notes Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 12:02:53 PM
Attachments: image002.png
Good Morning Eric,
Please find notes from the community meeting as well as a log of neighbors that have contacted us. Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else at this time.

Name Question Response
Neighbor
I would like to let your team know the flier that was mailed out was awful, and it is very hard to read this meeting address and map. Noted.

Mary Lou Babin-Branch Has the City approved the project? No, just submitted first application and plans a couple of weeks ago.

Rhonda Hain what is he target opening date? Currently targeting 4th Quarter 2023 but contingent on completion entitlement and permit approvals.

Neighbor Has there been an EIR performed on the ingress/egress of this proposal? Technical studies for CEQA have not been started yet.

Neighbor
Will you continue to notify the neighbors of updates to the proposed plans and changes? Yes, required to by the City's sunshine ordinance.

Neighbor What will be the proposed hours of the restaurant? Lobby is typically 6am – 11pm, Drive-thru is 24 hours. This is subject to change once the store is franchised.

Neighbor Is there a location that is closing in order to open this location? No, this is a new location.

Rhonda Hain will there be lighting for security in the lot? Yes, there will be adequate site lighting.

Neighbor Does the CHP have any influence to locate in this location? No, parking for apartments is in-between CHP and our site.

Liz Meade
I may have missed this information but is McDonalds replacing Del Taco or is it in another locations
Del Taco will remain, we are building new McDonald's adjacent to Del Taco where there is currently two vacant residential units.

Liz Meade So it is on Santa Clara rather that Tustin? Correct.

Neighbor
Do you think with In and Out and Chick-fil-A down the street and McDonalds and compete?
McDonald’s bases its development decisions on factors outside of the local competitors in the trade area.

We review the location itself, the population and income demographics of trade area where the new restaurant will be located at and the anticipated financial returns.

Mary Lou Babin-Branch
What is McDonalds planning to bring to the community, as a community partner not as a business?
The new store will provide jobs and tax revenue to the City. Our Franchisees are heavily involved with the community in through various charities and are always giving back to the community.

Neighbor
With a McDonald’s being just 1.5 miles from this location (17th and Santiago) is it necessary to build this one so close to the other, Although the McDonald’s at 17th/Santiago is close by, based on our research, there are enough people living in the area to allow us to open a new restaurant. In addition, the new restaurant will service customers that travel along Tustin Avenue which our restaurant on 17th is not servicing.

Neighbor
Instead of looking at this new location, did you consider the corner of Tustin and Santa Clara (South West Corner)?
The southwest corner parcel is too small to accommodate our standard restaurant building when you also include the land area needed for our drive-thru lane.

Person Contact Information Notes Action Item
Mary Lou Branch [email protected] Requested copy of the presentation.

Copy of presentation
sent.

Kim Cardoba
[email protected] or 714-547-
5771
Requested copy of the presentation. Owns the daycare across the street. Supportive but wants to see the traffic study when complete.

Copy of presentation
sent. Held 30 minute
phone call with Kim to
answer questions. Would
like to see traffic study
when it comes available.

Liesa Rego Attended the community meeting. N/A
Sean Y Attended the community meeting. N/A
Rhonda Hain Attended the community meeting. N/A
Liz Meade Attended the community meeting. N/A
Deborah Strunk 714-568-1786 Interested in moving homes as they may be historical.

Had great phone call with
her. Supportive of the
project.

Mary Falcon 714-454-6069 Supportive of the project. Supportive of the project.

Michelle Almazan 714-925-5880 Wasn’t able to get onto meeting.

Multiple attempts to
contact made.

Emily Mandrup 818-9195336 Supportive of the project. Willing to come out and speak in favor. Supportive of the project.

Patrica Creame Not supportive of the project. Sees traffic being the major issue. N/A Lance Rego [email protected] Very supportive of the project. Supportive of the project.

Michael Gregg
Director of Construction and Entitlements
DEVELOPING OUTSIDE THE BOX®
3161 Michelson Drive | Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92612
Phone 805-215-6453
[email protected]
www.streamrealty.com
City Council 23 – 144 4/2/2024
A new 3,975 square foot McDonald’s
restaurant with a drive-through located at
2101 Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana.

The development will include parking, trash
enclosure, paving and landscaping for the
associated restaurant. Access will be provided
from Santa Clara Avenue, along with reciprocal
access to the retail center adjacent via drive aisles
on the north and east.

Contact Applicant For Language Interpretation Services
Stream Realty Partners
Cordially Invites You to a
Community Information Meeting:

Thursday, April 21st at 5:15 p.m.

Virtual Meeting
https://msteams.link/IH1Z
Location of
Subject Property
Michael Gregg
[email protected]
909.601.3337
City Council 23 – 145 4/2/2024
Un nuevo restaurante McDonald’s de 3,975
pies cuadrados con un drive-through ubicado
en Avenida Santa Clara 2101, Santa Ana.

El desarrollo incluirá estacionamiento, cerramiento
de basura, pavimentación y paisajismo para el
restaurante asociado. El acceso se proporcionará
desde Santa Clara Avenue, junto con el acceso
recíproco al centro minorista adyacente a través
de los pasillos de acceso al norte y al este.

Stream Realty Partners
Cordialmente los invita a un
Reunión de Información Comunitaria:
jueves, abril 21 en 5:15 p.m.

Reunión virtual
https://msteams.link/IH1Z
Ubicación de
Propiedad del sujeto
Póngase en contacto con el solicitante de servicios de interpretación de idiomas Michael Gregg
[email protected]
909.601.3337
City Council 23 – 146 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 147 4/2/2024
Stream Realty Partners
www.streamrealty.com
3161 Michelson Drive Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92612
T. 949.656.7051
February 7, 2023
Pedro Gomez
City of Santa Ana, Planning Division
20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex M-20
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Re: McDonald’s Drive-Through Restaurant, 2101 and 2109 East Santa Clara Street, DP No. 2022-06R, 2nd Community Meeting (Sunshine Ordinance)
Dear Pedro,
Per the requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance, please find attached the following reference items for the second community meeting held on February 2nd, 2023.

1. Mailer labels & 1,000-foot radius map

2. Community meeting flyer (English & Spanish)
a. Mailed January 23, 2023 to the property owners and occupants

3. Newspaper notice
a. Affidavit/Proof of Publication of the meeting notice on both January 23rd, 2023 and January 26th, 2023 by the Orange County Register
b. Photo of Notice

4. Scanned attendee sign-in sheet
a. Names and emails of meeting attendees (all attendees were urged to sign-in but all did not)

5. Meeting minutes

6. Displayed exhibits
I confirm, under penalty of perjury, that Stream Realty Partners conducted the above referenced community meeting, as required by the Sunshine Ordinance. These items are being submitted within four business days.

Thank You,
Donald Ellis
Senior Vice President
Stream Realty Partners
City Council 23 – 148 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 149 4/2/2024
APN NAME Address CITY ST ZIP
396-261-26 SRP/STATER BROS LLC 3161 MICHELSON DR #100 IRVINE CA 92612 396-261-26 OCCUPANT 2101 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-38 SRP STATER BROS LLC 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-02 MICHAEL ANTHONY JONES 1905 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-03 MARK DAVID SMITH 1909 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-04 DAVID HAGLUND 1913 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-05 DIETRICH KANZLER/VIRGINIA TA 1917 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-06 MARK & STEPHANIE MCCALLIE 1918 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-07 SYDNEY F CHANDLER 1914 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-08 PATRICIA MARIE HEALY 1910 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-09 ROGER C WADELL 1906 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-13 CARLOS CORTES-ROVIRA/BEATRIZ MACEIRA 12392 RANCHVIEW DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-13 OCCUPANT 1909 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-14 MARTHA W WORRALL 1913 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-15 JAMES R & DONNA L CRAMSIE 1917 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-16 NANCY CAROL JACK 955 W 19TH ST #D123 COSTA MESA CA 92627 396-041-16 OCCUPANT 1918 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-17 LAWRENCE ONTIVEROS 1914 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-29 JOSE ERNESTO MENDOZA GUTIERREZ 2113 N MILLWOOD ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-30 PERRY E ELKINS 2109 MILLWOOD ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-30 OCCUPANT 2109 MILLWOOD ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-041-37 CITY OF SANT A ANA 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA SANTA ANA CA 92701 396-102-01 STEPHEN C CALHOUN 2424 CHELSEA RD PALOS VERDE ESTATES CA 90274 396-102-01 OCCUPANT 2125 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-02 CARLOS & JULIANNA ALCAZAR 2121 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-03 RUTH MARIE BABESHOFF 2117 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-04 BEVERLY ANN MAYO 2113 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-05 FELIX DE LA RIVA 2109 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-06 JAMES F HOWARD 2105 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-07 DELIA L MOSBACK 2101 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-08 SHERRY J SCHWANKE 2017 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-09 EMILY C MANDRUP 2013 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-10 REACH RYANS 13 AUGUSTA COTA DE CAZA CA 92679 396-102-10 OCCUPANT 2009 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-11 MARK R HANNAH 2005 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-102-12 LYNDSEY & JASON UPCRAFT 2001 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-01 MAURO & LINDA TAPIA 2126 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-02 LAIZA ROCHA OLIVEIRA 2122 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-03 STEPHEN D BOWERS 13422 DAWN AVE GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 396-104-03 OCCUPANT 2118 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-04 MARGARET R LEHMAN 2114 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-05 CATHERINE A/LESLIE DOUGLAS 2110 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-104-06 KRISTIN SERNA 2106 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 RYAN WILLIAM/PAULA JEAN GRIFFIN 2919 PAPER LN NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE R2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE Rl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE Q SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE L SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE K SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE J SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE I SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 150 4/2/2024
396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2431 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE L SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE K SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE J SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE I SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-01 OCCUPANT 2441 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-02 DOROTHY M HACKETHAL 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-02 RESIDENT 2410 PON DEROSA ST APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-02 RESIDENT 2410 PON DEROSA ST APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-02 RESIDENT 2410 PON DEROSA ST APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-02 RESIDENT 2410 PON DEROSA ST APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-03 HGC PROPERTIES 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-03 RESIDENT 2414 PON DEROSA ST APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-03 RESIDENT 2414 PON DEROSA ST APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-03 RESIDENT 2414 PON DEROSA ST APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-03 RESIDENT 2414 PON DEROSA ST APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-04 TUAN SI TRAN 1151 DRAYTON WAY TUSTIN CA 92780 396-131-04 RESIDENT 2418 PON DEROSA ST APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-04 RESIDENT 2418 PON DEROSA ST APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-04 RESIDENT 2418 PON DEROSA ST APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-04 RESIDENT 2418 PON DEROSA ST APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-23 DOROTHY M HACKETHAL 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-23 RESIDENT 2229 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-23 RESIDENT 2229 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-23 RESIDENT 2229 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-23 RESIDENT 2229 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-24 HGC PROPERTIES 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-24 RESIDENT 2228 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-24 RESIDENT 2228 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-24 RESIDENT 2228 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-24 RESIDENT 2228 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-25 VIRGINIA G CARLYLE 14 GOLD BLF IRVINE CA 92604 396-131-25 RESIDENT 2224 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-25 RESIDENT 2224 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-25 RESIDENT 2224 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-25 RESIDENT 2224 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-26 DOROTHY M HACKETHAL 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-26 RESIDENT 2220 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-26 RESIDENT 2220 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 151 4/2/2024
396-131-26 RESIDENT 2220 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-26 RESIDENT 2220 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-27 RON & CHRIS RENTALS 25392 DERBYHILL DR LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 396-131-27 OCCUPANT 2429 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-46 HAVAPART LLC PO BOX 30000 JACKSON WY 83002
396-131-46 RESIDENT 2236 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-46 RESIDENT 2236 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-46 RESIDENT 2236 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-46 RESIDENT 2236 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-47 HGC PROPERTIES 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-131-47 RESIDENT 2232 FRANZEN AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-47 RESIDENT 2232 FRANZEN AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-47 RESIDENT 2232 FRANZEN AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-131-47 RESIDENT 2232 FRANZEN AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-01 LIESE L REGO 18262 OAK RIDGE DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-01 OCCUPANT 2301 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-07 LONG RIDGE ASSOCIATES 18262 OAK RIDGE DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-07 OCCUPANT 2151 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 LENNOX INVEST 5855 E CARSON ST LAKEWOOD CA 90713 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2401 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2403 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2405 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2407 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2409 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2411 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2413 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2415 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2417 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2419 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2421 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2423 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2425 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2425 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2425 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2425 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2427 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2427 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2427 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-09 OCCUPANT 2427 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 APPLEWOOD FOXBOROUGH 485 ALBERTO WAY# 200 LOS GATOS CA 95032 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2201 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2201 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2201 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2203 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2203 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 9270S 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2203 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2203 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 152 4/2/2024
396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2205 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2207 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2209 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2211 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2211 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2211 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2211 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2213 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2213 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2213 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2213 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2215 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2217 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2219 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2221 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2223 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 153 4/2/2024
396-141-12 RESIDENT 2223 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2223 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2223 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2224 E SANT A CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2225 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2227 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2229 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2231 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2231 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2231 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2231 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2233 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2235 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2235 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2235 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2235 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2237 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2239 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2239 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2239 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2239 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 154 4/2/2024
396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 RESIDENT 2241 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-12 OCCUPANT 2243 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-13 WILLIAM A WOODWARD 2343 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 WILLIAM JESS NORWOOD 2323 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE I SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STEM SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE J SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE K SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STE L SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-141-14 OCCUPANT 2323 N TUSTIN AVE STEN SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-20 CHURCH ST JOHNS LUTHERANOF ORANGE 154 S SHAFFER ST ORANGE CA 92866 396-261-21 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 601 N 7TH ST SACRAMENTO CA 95811 396-261-21 OCCUPANT 2031 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-26 OCCUPANT 2101 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-30 OCCUPANT 2360 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-31 WILLIAM H HASENJAEGER 1602 CAROLINA ST# D3 BELLINGHAM WA 98229 396-261-32 WILLIAM H HASENJAEGER 1602 CAROLINA ST# D3 BELLINGHAM WA 98229 396-261-33 JOHN O HASENJAEGER 4620 NE DAVIS ST PORTLAND OR 97213 396-261-33 OCCUPANT 2360 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 SRP STATER BROS LLC 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2370 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2370 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2370 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2370 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STEC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE D SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE E SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE F SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE G SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2380 N TUSTIN AVE STE H SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2390 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-34 OCCUPANT 2390 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-35 SRP STATER BROS LLC 62 FISHER CREEK DR RIDGEWAY co 81432 396-261-36 DEVLING PLACE APARTMENTS 445 SANTIAGO AVE LONG BEACH CA 90814 396-261-36 OCCUPANT 2300 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-37 SRP STATER BROS LLC 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 155 4/2/2024
396-261-38 SRP ST ATER BROS LLC 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-49 ORANGE COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT 25751 TRABUCO RD EL TORO CA 92630 396-261-49 OCCUPANT 1919 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-50 ORANGE COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT 25751 TRABUCO RD EL TORO CA 92630 396-261-50 OCCUPANT 1919 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 TUSTIN AVENUE APARTMENTS LLC 26 CORPORATE PARK DR# 200 IRVINE CA 92602 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT JS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT J8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Kl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT KS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT KlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Kll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-SS RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT KlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT K16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT LS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT L7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT LS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ml SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT MS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT M7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT MS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Nl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT NS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 156 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT NS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Nl0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Nll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT N12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 01 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 02 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 03 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 04 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 05 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 06 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 07 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 08 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 09 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 010 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 011 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 012 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Pl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT PS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT PS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APTPlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT PlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT P16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ql SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT QS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Rl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT RS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT RS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT RlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 157 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT RlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT R16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT AS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT A7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT AS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT BS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT B7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT BS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT CS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT CS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Cl0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Cll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT C12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT DS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT DS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT DlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Dll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT D12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT El SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT ES SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 158 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT E7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT ES SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT F7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT FS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Gl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT GS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT GS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT GlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Gll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT G16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Hl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT HS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT HS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Hl0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT Hll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT HlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT H16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE APT 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 OCCUPANT 2414 N TUSTIN AVE OFC SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 159 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT AS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT AS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Al0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT All SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT A12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT BS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT BS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Bl0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Bll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT B12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT CS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT C8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT D8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT El SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT ES SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT E8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT FS SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 160 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT FlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Fll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT F14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT FlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Gl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT GS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT GlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Gll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT G15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Hl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT HS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT H8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT JS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT J8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Kl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 161 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Kll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KB SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT K14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT KlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LlO SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Lll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LB SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT L14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT LlS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ml SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT MS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT M7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT MS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Nl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT NS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT N7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT NS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 01 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 02 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 03 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 04 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 05 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 06 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 07 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 08 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Pl SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 162 4/2/2024
396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT PS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT P7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT PS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ql SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT QS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Ql0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Qll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Q12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Rl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT RS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT RS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Rll SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT R12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 51 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 52 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 53 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 54 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT 55 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT S6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT S7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT S8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT S9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT Tl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT TS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT TS SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-261-55 RESIDENT 2424 N TUSTIN AVE APT T9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-02 JISU YOUM 2220 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-03 KEVIN & CRYSTAL JAMIESON 2216 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-04 CHRISTOPHER MELAD/CYNTHIA NGUYEN 2212 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 163 4/2/2024
396-281-05 JOHN VANDERHOEK/IVONNE LANDEROS 2208 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-06 CHARLES WESLEY SUTHERLAND 2204 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-07 DANA M DIETZ 2200 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-08 MICHELLE LOUISE ROJAS-ALMAZAN 2126 PASADENA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-18 ANGELA FROEHLICH/RONALD JOSEPH BURKARD 2224 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-25 HERBERT STEELE JRTR BOWDEN 18132 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-25 RESIDENT 2230 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-25 RESIDENT 2232 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-26 JAMES C & GUADALUPE F LOPEZ 2228 N PON DEROSA STA SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-26 RESIDENT 2226 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-26 RESIDENT 2228 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-27 WESTERN SEQUOIA HOLDINGS LLC 9910 CAM ROSE CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-281-27 RESIDENT 2222 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-27 RESIDENT 2224 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-28 TOMY J MAKIL 1614 E CHESTNUT AVE ORANGE CA 92867 396-281-28 RESIDENT 2201 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-28 RESIDENT 2203 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-29 VALDEZ DANE ANDRE & EMILY MARY 2204 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-29 RESIDENT 2202 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-30 NAZANIN FARHAD 2800 KELLER DR# 57 TUSTIN CA 92782 396-281-30 RESIDENT 2206 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-30 RESIDENT 2204 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-31 STEPHEN FEAR 1626 CHESTNUT ST# 8 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 396-281-31 RESIDENT 2208 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-31 RESIDENT 2210 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-31 RESIDENT 2212 E BUFFALO AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-32 MARGIE M ALCARAZ 18641 E AUBURN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-32 RESIDENT 2213 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-33 CHRISTOPHER T & JANAE BRANNEN 2209 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-34 NANCY CAROL JACK 955 W 19TH ST #D123 COSTA MESA CA 92627 396-281-34 OCCUPANT 2205 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-35 MICHAEL J & MAUREEN P MOSS 6570 E FORDHAM CIR ANAHEIM CA 92807 396-281-35 RESIDENT 2201 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-35 RESIDENT 2203 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-36 NORMA NODAL DUENAS 229 E COMMONWEALTH AVE# 236 FULLERTON CA 92832 396-281-36 RESIDENT 2202 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-36 RESIDENT 2204 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-37 MARIE J URIBE 17220 NEWHOPE ST# 224 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 396-281-37 RESIDENT 2206 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-37 RESIDENT 2208 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-38 JORGE RICARDO BARTLETT 21404 STANWELL ST CHATSWORTH CA 91311 396-281-38 OCCUPANT 2210 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-38 RESIDENT 2212 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-39 TIMOTHY R HARRIS 2214 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-39 RESIDENT 2216 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-40 LUCATERO IGNACIO & MARIA TRINIDAD 2218 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-41 MARTIN & SYLVIA CAZAREZ PO BOX 10441 SANTA ANA CA 92711 396-281-41 RESIDENT 2220 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-41 RESIDENT 2201 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-41 RESIDENT 2203 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-42 WESTERN SEQUOIA HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 9863 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92728 396-281-42 RESIDENT 2207 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 164 4/2/2024
396-281-42 RESIDENT 2209 E AVALON AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-43 ROBERT L SHANNON PO BOX4455 ORANGE CA 92863
396-281-43 RESIDENT 2209 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-43 RESIDENT 2211 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-44 JENNIFER DIANE ESSER PO BOX 656 TUSTIN CA 92781 396-281-44 RESIDENT 2213 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-44 RESIDENT 2215 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-45 SIYAMAC & FA THEME RASTAWAN 2217 N PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-45 RESIDENT 2217 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-45 RESIDENT 2219 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-46 ANGELICA MEJIA 1744 W CATHERINE DR ANAHEIM CA 92801 396-281-46 RESIDENT 2221 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-46 RESIDENT 2223 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-47 CLAY M MICHAEL MC 8334 E CANDLEBERRY ORANGE CA 92869 396-281-47 RESIDENT 2225 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-47 RESIDENT 2227 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-48 CHAE HAK YI 20 DELAWARE IRVINE CA 92620
396-281-48 RESIDENT 2229 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-48 RESIDENT 2231 PON DEROSA ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-49 CKL PROP LLC 20640 MIRKWOOD RUN YORBA LINDA CA 92886 396-281-49 OCCUPANT 2231 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-50 FRAZEE TUSTIN PROPERTIES 1005 ROSECRANS ST# 202 SAN DIEGO CA 92106 396-281-50 OCCUPANT 2201 N TUSTIN AVE STE 100 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-50 OCCUPANT 2201 N TUSTIN AVE STE 110 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-50 OCCUPANT 2201 N TUSTIN AVE STE 120 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY 2101 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 OCCUPANT 2121 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 OCCUPANT 2231 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 OCCUPANT 2235 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-281-51 OCCUPANT 2239 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-291-07 SANTAANA EXPRESS CAR WASH LLC 3300 WINDY RIDGE PKWY SE UN #1019ATLANTA GA 30339 396-291-07 OCCUPANT 2035 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-292-01 LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY 2101 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-292-02 PETER GEORGE EPPELODAUER EPPELDAUER 67 DOMANI IRVINE CA 92618 396-292-02 OCCUPANT 2233 CATALINA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-331-01 MONTREH LLC 2355 PIEPER LN TUSTIN CA 92782
396-331-01 OCCUPANT 2102 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 RICHMAN HOLDINGS LLC 2090 N TUSTIN AVE 200 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2080 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2080 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 100 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 140 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 150 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 160 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 200 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 240 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-332-05 OCCUPANT 2090 N TUSTIN AVE STE 250 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 CADIGAN SANTA CLARA LP 440 W 1ST ST# 201 TUSTIN CA 92780 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 165 4/2/2024
396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT 14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT 19 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 20 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 21 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 22 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 23 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 24 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 25 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 26 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 27 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 28 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 29 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 30 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 31 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 32 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 33 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 34 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 35 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 36 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 37 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 38 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 39 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 40 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 41 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 42 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 43 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 44 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 45 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 46 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 47 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 48 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 49 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 50 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 51 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-01 RESIDENT 1950 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 52 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 2002 E SANTA CLARA LP 500 NEWPORT CENTER DR# 200 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 396-341-02 OCCUPANT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT L1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT L2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 166 4/2/2024
396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT L3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT L4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT K2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Kl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT J2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT J1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT G2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT El SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANT A CLARA AVE APT E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Gl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Hl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT F4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Ql SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Q2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Q3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Q4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT N4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT P4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT P3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT P2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Pl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT H3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Nl SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT N2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT N3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT M4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT M3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT M2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-02 RESIDENT 2002 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT Ml SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 OCCUPANT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 167 4/2/2024
396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 9 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 14 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 19 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 20 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 21 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 22 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 23 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 24 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 25 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 26 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 27 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 28 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 29 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 30 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 31 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 32 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 33 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 34 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 35 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 36 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 37 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 38 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 39 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 40 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 41 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 42 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 43 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 44 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 45 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 46 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 47 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-03 RESIDENT 2010 E SANTA CLARA AVE APT 48 SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-05 PURVIS ENTERPRISES LLC 3 JADE CV CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 396-341-05 OCCUPANT 2112 E SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-06 HEINECKE GOULD PROPERTIES LLC 47 MARBELLA SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 396-341-06 OCCUPANT 2230 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 HEINECKE GOULD PROPERTIES LLC 47 MARBELLA SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 City Council 23 – 168 4/2/2024
396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2130 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2106 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2110 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2112 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2114 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2116 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2118 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2120 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2122 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2124 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2126 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2128 N TUSTIN AVE STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2128 N TUSTIN AVE STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2130 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2132 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2134 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2136 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2138 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2140 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2142 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2150 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-07 OCCUPANT 2156 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 396-341-08 HEINECKE GOULD PROPERTIES LLC 47 MARBELLA SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 396-341-08 OCCUPANT 2106 N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-001 THOM GSELL 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-002 GARCIA ANGIE L / VELOZ MARIA L 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-003 SHARON L VELCI 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-004 CHARLES B & SUZANNE HARRISON/ HARRISON SUZANNE2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-005 NGA TRAN 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-006 ROBERT E CHANEY 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-007 MAUREEN T BAYLEY 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-008 DAVID L DENNY/ SUAREZ, MARIA CARMEN 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-009 HORIZONS VISTA 3030 MADEIRA AVE COSTA MESA CA 92626 932-68-009 OCCUPANT 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-010 ALEXANDER GARCIA 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-011 RUTH MARIE MARCOLY 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-012 ALEJANDRO ABDI EL LOPEZ VEGA/ LOPEZ, FERNANDA 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-013 EUSEBIO SANTANA GARCIA/ BENITEZ, ARELI SALGADO 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-014 JAIME D MONGE/ DE MONGE, MARTHA E HERNANDEZ 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-015 LORRAINE C MC LAUGHLIN 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-016 LAWRENCE BLAIR BODY 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# El SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-017 VIVIANA GUTERREZ/ LEWIS AMIR R 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-018 ALICIA SABILLON 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-019 YESENIA BAHENA OCAMPO 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-020 BARBARA L SHOEMAKER 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-021 NAYELI N CARLIN MERCADO/ COLINDRES, PEDRO A DIAZ2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-022 MARY & ROMAN FALCON 2034 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-023 DORIS K COTR IDBAYEH / IDBAYEH FREDDY COTR 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Nl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-024 ARTHUR MICHAEL RICHMAN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# N2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-025 RHONDA MARIE HAIN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# N3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-026 ROBIN E MORGAN 3148 PINEY CREEK RD WILLIAMSBURG PA 16693 932-68-026 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# M3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 169 4/2/2024
932-68-027 GEORGE A MATICS 12341 RED HILL AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-027 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# M2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-028 JERI KENNISON 5951 LAGUNA VILLA WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 932-68-028 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Ml SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-029 ALYCE L READ 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# L1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-030 ANDRES CORONA/ MONGE, SASHA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# L2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-031 HASSAN TA TIANA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# L3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-032 MICHELLE DELGADO 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-033 VICTOR M CUETO 12912 VILLA ROSE DR SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-033 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F3 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-034 DANIEL RIVERA 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F2 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-035 VICTOR REYNAFARJE 331 AVENI DA SEVILLA# A LAGUNA WOODS CA 92637 932-68-035 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-036 AMY AZPEITIA / CERA JESUS ANTONIO LOPEZ 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-037 DAVID MIN-WOO OH 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-038 ELAINE ELVA MAES 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-039 ALEXANDER N KEMP 42580 MARACAY PL BERMUDA DUNES CA 92203 932-68-039 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# El SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-040 DEBRA L FREDERICKSON 1433 SANTIAGO DR NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 932-68-040 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-041 MARTINEZ DARLING & MARIA DE LOURDES 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-042 VICTOR REYNAFARJE 331 AVENI DA SEVILLA# A LAGUNA WOODS CA 92637 932-68-042 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-043 VICTORIA CHEN RUTLEDGE 13751 BELLE RIVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-043 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-044 ALBERTO LOZANO RODRIGUEZ/ LOZANO, SONIA A 2026 E SANT A CLARA AVE C4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-045 RONALD E MCCAIN PO BOX 11244 SANTA ANA CA 92711 932-68-045 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C3 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-046 GUSTAVO E ARANDA 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C2 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 932-68-047 MARISELA MONTOYA 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-048 JOSE GUADALUPE DIAZ/ SANTOS, CONSUELO MENDOZA2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-049 LEOLA LORD 13552 MALENA DR TUSTIN CA 92780
932-68-049 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-050 JESSICA & ARTURO SEPULVEDA 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-051 PETRA PETRY 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-052 ANN A EDWARDS 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-053 JOSHUA & ALEXIS SCHNOOR 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-054 JERRY MEISTER 6522 ALEXANDRA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 932-68-054 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-055 VICTORIA CHEN RUTLEDGE 13751 BELLE RIVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-055 OCCUPANT 2026 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-056 RICHARD C THOMPSON PO BOX 3244 ORANGE CA 92857 932-68-056 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Al SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-057 YOLANDA CARDENAS 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-0S8 FRANK M WARD 2725 S POPLAR ST SANTA ANA CA 92704 932-68-058 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-059 ALICIA ORDAZ 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# A4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-060 ANN A EDWARDS 2030 E SANT A CLARA AVE # B4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-061 TUMAN G DOYLE 709 1ST STREET WOODLAND CA 95695 932-68-061 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# B3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-062 LEE NAKAMURA 18781 PINTO LN SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-062 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# 82 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 170 4/2/2024
932-68-063 LEOLA LORD 13552 MALENA DR TUSTIN CA 92780
932-68-063 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Bl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-064 ROBERT J & JELDENA L VAVRA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Cl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-065 LARRY JOE WARD 1145 E CHALYNN AVE ORANGE CA 92866 932-68-065 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-066 DENNIS C FORSYTH 448 EL CAMINO DEL MAR LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 932-68-066 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# C3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-067 HARRY E & ANN L SEXTON 726 KENDALL DR LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 932-68-067 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# D3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-068 JOHN D ISORENA TEDDY 2030 LAST SANTA CLARA AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-069 CARIDAD CASATE 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Dl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-070 DONNA M TURNER 444 N SHAFFER ST ORANGE CA 92866 932-68-070 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# El SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-071 JOSEPHINE STATON 66 PARSON BROWN IRVINE CA 92618 932-68-071 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-072 MICHELLE NGOC MAI THAI 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# E3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-073 LONGORIA OLIVIA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-074 WALSH RICHARD JOHN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# F2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-075 GONZALO & CELINA FLORES 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Fl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-076 LEE WALSHE 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Gl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-077 NANCY MEJIA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# G2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-078 MAGDALENA S MACIAS 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# G3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-079 DAWN RASHER 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Kl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-080 SAMUAL WAYNE HAGERMAN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# K2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-081 ROJAS RYAN/ ROJAS JOHANNA N 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# K3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-082 LAURA V ORTIZ 13211 RAINBOW ST GARDEN GROVE CA 92843 932-68-082 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# J3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-083 GAYLE A STEWART 815 E PARK LN SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-083 OCCUPANT 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# J2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-084 CARLOS RIVAS/ HERNANDEZ, ISABELLE CRISTINA 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# J1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-085 GEORGE & ANDROMACHI KYRIAKIDIS 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# Hl SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-086 FRANCISCA & RUBEN I BARRA/ I BARRA RUBEN 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# H2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 932-68-087 DANILO MARQUEZ BAQUING 2030 E SANTA CLARA AVE# H3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-001 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-001 OCCUPANT 2616 N TUSTIN AVE# 1 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-002 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / PALM ROTH, KATHY2616 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-003 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-003 OCCUPANT 2616 N TUSTIN AVE# 3 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-004 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC EAST TOWER IRVINE CA 92614 933-92-004 OCCUPANT 2616 N TUSTIN AVE# 4 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-005 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2525 ROMANY RD SACRAMENTO CA 95814 933-92-005 OCCUPANT 2616 N TUSTIN AVE# 5 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-006 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-006 OCCUPANT 2608 N TUSTIN AVE# 6 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-007 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / EBERLE, JOHN G 7912 COLONIAL CT PLEASANTON CA 94588 933-92-007 OCCUPANT 2608 N TUSTIN AVE# 7 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-008 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-008 OCCUPANT 2608 N TUSTIN AVE# 8 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-009 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / CONTRERAS, OLGA2608 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-010 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-010 OCCUPANT 2600 N TUSTIN AVE# 10 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-011 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 City Council 23 – 171 4/2/2024
933-92-011 OCCUPANT 2600 N TUSTIN AVE# 11 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-012 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / QUEST MANAGEMENT LLC PO BOX 5284 ORANGE CA 92863 933-92-012 OCCUPANT 2600 N TUSTIN AVE# 12 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-013 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-013 OCCUPANT 2600 N TUSTIN AVE# 13 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-014 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LUONG, NHUT HONG2600 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-015 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-015 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 15 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-016 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-016 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 16 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-017 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / FEDERAL HOME LOAN350 HIGHLAND DR LEWISVILLE TX 75067 933-92-017 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 17 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-018 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-018 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 18 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-019 ENTERPRISES LLC PUMA PO BOX 11623 SANTA ANA CA 92711 933-92-019 OCCUPANT 2526 N TUSTIN AVE# 19 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-020 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / HERNANDEZ, JUAN BARAJAS 2602 N TUSTIN AVE# 20 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-021 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / AGUILAR, NORMA EDITH 2100 E KATELLA AVE# 455 ANAHEIM CA 92806 933-92-021 OCCUPANT 2602 N TUSTIN AVE# 21 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-022 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2602 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-023 INEKKE IWAN 11 HALF MOON BAY DR CORONA DELMAR CA 92625 933-92-023 OCCUPANT 2602 N TUSTIN AVE# 23 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-024 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BROWN, DIERCH LEFFERDINK 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# G SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-025 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / GOMEZ, JUAN J 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 25 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-026 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-026 OCCUPANT 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 26 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-027 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-027 OCCUPANT 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 27 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-028 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 28 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-029 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 13681 NEWPORT AVE# 8 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-029 OCCUPANT 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 29 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-030 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 60409 JUNIPER LN LA QUINTA CA 92253 933-92-030 OCCUPANT 2610 N TUSTIN AVE# 30 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-031 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LEE, SCOTT 1453 FOXTROTTER RD NORCO CA 92860 933-92-031 OCCUPANT 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# 31 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-032 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / RIVERA, FRANCISCO2618 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-033 LAURIE A YOH 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-034 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-034 OCCUPANT 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# 34 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-035 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / HONG, DAVID Y 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-036 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-036 OCCUPANT 2618 N TUSTIN AVE# 36 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-037 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-037 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 37 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-038 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / CHOUCAIR, TONY JOSE 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-039 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-039 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 39 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-040 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-040 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 40 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-041 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / TORRES, RENATO LARIOS 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-042 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / SEU, GEORGE Y 12592 LORALEEN ST GARDEN GROVE CA 92841 933-92-042 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 42 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 172 4/2/2024
933-92-043 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-043 OCCUPANT 2620 N TUSTIN AVE# 43 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-044 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-044 OCCUPANT 2612 N TUSTIN AVE# 44 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-045 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 14231 UTRILLO DR IRVINE CA 92606 933-92-045 OCCUPANT 2612 N TUSTIN AVE# 45 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-046 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / NELSON, WANDA S2612 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-047 AARON PATRICK & ERICA ANN JOLENE FLORA/ FLORA ERICA ANN JOLENE 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-048 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / W&L INTERNATIONAL LLC 10722 ARROW ROUTE# 500 RANCHOCUCAMONGA CA 91729 933-92-048 OCCUPANT 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# 48 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-049 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, DAT 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-049 OCCUPANT 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# 49 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-050 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-051 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / MEDINA, MANUEL Ill 2301 N BAKER ST SANTA ANA CA 92706 933-92-051 OCCUPANT 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# 51 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-052 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2604 AN TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-052 OCCUPANT 2604 N TUSTIN AVE# 52 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-053 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / GARO, DENTON 624 N HAMLIN ORANGE CA 92869 933-92-053 OCCUPANT 2528 N TUSTIN AVE# 53 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-054 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / NICHOLSON, DANIEL A 333 W BROADWAY# 28 ANAHEIM CA 92815 933-92-054 OCCUPANT 2528 N TUSTIN AVE# 54 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-055 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, DAT 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-055 OCCUPANT 2528 N TUSTIN AVE# 55 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-056 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / CARGILL, JOHN WARREN TR 2528 N TUSTIN AVE# 56 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-057 JWR PROPERTYMANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-057 OCCUPANT 2520 N TUSTIN AVE# 57 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-058 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / AYALA, MARINA 2520 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-059 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BRICKHOUSE TUSTIN LLC 545 S LORETTA DR ORANGE CA 92869 933-92-059 OCCUPANT 2520 N TUSTIN AVE# 59 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-060 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-060 OCCUPANT 2520 N TUSTIN AVE# 60 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-061 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-061 OCCUPANT 2522 N TUSTIN AVE# 61 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-062 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ANDRADE, CLAUDIA S 2522 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-063 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-063 OCCUPANT 2522 N TUSTIN AVE# 63 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-064 DAVID C BROWN 10081 SUNRISE LN TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-064 OCCUPANT 2522 N TUSTIN AVE# 64 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-065 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / MIRANDA, JULIET REYTA 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# G SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-066 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 29 WHISTLING SWAN IRVINE CA 92604 933-92-066 OCCUPANT 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# 66 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-067 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-068 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-068 OCCUPANT 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# 68 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-069 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / MUFTI, HINA 1621 BRYAN AVE TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-069 OCCUPANT 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# 69 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-070 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-070 OCCUPANT 2514 N TUSTIN AVE# 70 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-071 EC INVESTMENT GROUP INC/ GUTIERREZ MAYRA L 2514 N TUSTIN AVE UN #A SANTA ANA CA 9270S 933-92-072 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-072 OCCUPANT 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# 72 SANTA ANA CA 9270S 933-92-073 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LINN, ERIC J 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 173 4/2/2024
933-92-074 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / MUFTI, HINA 1612 BRYAN TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-074 OCCUPANT 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# 74 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-075 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-075 OCCUPANT 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# 75 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-076 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ARZATE, EDWIN 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-077 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2512 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-078 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-078 OCCUPANT 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 78 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-079 SUMMER J MYERS 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 79 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-080 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-080 OCCUPANT 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 80 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-081 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / POLCE, JOHN JOSEPH13700 N FOUNTAIN HILLS BLVD# 363 COUNTAIN HILLS AZ 85268 933-92-081 OCCUPANT 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 81 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-082 LY LOAN 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-083 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BUNN, NANCY TR N BUNN 11 HALF MOON BAY DR CORONA DELMAR CA 92625 933-92-083 OCCUPANT 2518 N TUSTIN AVE# 83 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-084 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-084 OCCUPANT 2516 N TUSTIN AVE# 0 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-085 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-085 OCCUPANT 2516 N TUSTIN AVE# 85 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-086 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2516 N TUSTIN AVE# 86 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-087 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-087 OCCUPANT 2500 N TUSTIN AVE# 87 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-088 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-088 OCCUPANT 2500 N TUSTIN AVE# 88 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-089 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / GOLLIN, KURT E 2500 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-090 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-090 OCCUPANT 2500 N TUSTIN AVE# 90 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-091 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-091 OCCUPANT 2502 N TUSTIN AVE# 91 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-092 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2502 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-093 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / VELAZQUEZ, MATEO2502 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-094 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC /AM G INTERNATIONAL LLC 1619 W CRESCENT AVE# M76 ANAHEIM CA 92801 933-92-094 OCCUPANT 2502 N TUSTIN AVE# 94 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-095 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / KIM, BO YUN 2504 N TUSTIIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-096 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / KIM, BO YUN 2504 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 90705 933-92-097 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LERMA, ROSANA 2504 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-098 US BANK NA 3121 MICHELSON DR 500 IRVINE CA 92612 933-92-098 OCCUPANT 2504 N TUSTIN AVE# 98 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-099 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-099 OCCUPANT 2506 N TUSTIN AVE# 99 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-100 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST # 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-100 OCCUPANT 2506 N TUSTIN AVE# 100 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-101 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / JENSEN, DENISE PO BOX 58344 VERNON CA 90058 933-92-101 OCCUPANT 2506 N TUSTIN AVE# 101 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-102 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / WRIGHT, LORETTA ANNE 2506 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-103 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 19411 WORCHESTER LN HUNTINGTONBEACH CA 92646 933-92-103 OCCUPANT 2508 N TUSTIN AVE# 103 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-104 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / CARO, GEORGE RAYMOND JR 2508 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-105 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / SANTANA, MYUNG RAN 2508 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-106 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ONYX LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-106 OCCUPANT 2508 N TUSTIN AVE# 106 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 174 4/2/2024
933-92-107 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BUNN, NANCY TR N BUNN 11 HALF MOON BAY DR NEWPORT BEACH CA 92661 933-92-107 OCCUPANT 2510 N TUSTIN AVE# 107 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-108 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / KLAWITTER, BRYAN EDWARD 2510 N TUSTIN AVE# 108 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-109 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 537 S SILKTREE CIR ORANGE CA 92868 933-92-109 OCCUPANT 2510 N TUSTIN AVE# 109 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-110 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / DURAN, CARLOS VELAZQUEZ 2510 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-111 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / DOWNING, CARI LYNN2510 N TUSTIN AVE# 111 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-112 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2013 BARCLAY CT SANTA ANA CA 92701 933-92-112 OCCUPANT 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# 112 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-113 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / HOLT, RONALD 2244 E PEPPER HILL DR ORANGE CA 92867 933-92-113 OCCUPANT 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# 113 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-114 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC /MCBRIDE, MICHAEL2622 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-115 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-115 OCCUPANT 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# 115 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-116 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BRISCOE, JOHN FREDERICK 375 ATLANTIC AVE# 101 LONG BEACH CA 90802 933-92-116 OCCUPANT 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# 116 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-117 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-117 OCCUPANT 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# 117 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-118 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / WARDE, LINDA J 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA MA CA 92705 933-92-119 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LEDON, JEFFREY 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-120 GMAC MORTGAGE 3900 CAPITAL CITY BLVD LANSING Ml 48906 933-92-120 OCCUPANT 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# 120 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-121 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-121 OCCUPANT 2530 N TUSTIN AVE# 121 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-122 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / GONZALES, DIETER M2530 N TUSTIN AVE# A SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-123 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA 3415 VISION DR COLUMBUS OH 43219 933-92-123 OCCUPANT 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# 123 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-124 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / STA ANA, LANIE SALVIEJO 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-125 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-125 OCCUPANT 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# 125 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-126 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-126 OCCUPANT 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# 126 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-127 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON PO BOX 619079 DALLAS TX 75261 933-92-127 OCCUPANT 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# 127 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-128 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2606 N TUSTIN AVE# F SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-129 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-129 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# 129 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-130 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-130 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# 130 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-131 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 17602 17TH ST# 102 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-131 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# 131 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-132 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-132 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# 132 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-133 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / BROWN, RANDALL C2614 E N TUSTIN AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-133 OCCUPANT 2614 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-134 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ALLISON, CLAY W 2722 N LYON ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-134 OCCUPANT 2626 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-135 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-135 OCCUPANT 2626 N TUSTIN AVE# 135 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-136 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / AHMAD, ANDREW 2626 C N TUSTIN AVE# 136 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-137 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 27181 VALLEYMONT RD LAKE FOREST CA 92630 933-92-137 OCCUPANT 2626 N TUSTIN AVE# 137 SANTA ANA CA 92705 City Council 23 – 175 4/2/2024
933-92-138 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-138 OCCUPANT 2626 N TUSTIN AVE# 138 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-139 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 933-92-139 OCCUPANT 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# 139 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-140 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / ZUNIGA, ALFREDO CEJA 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# E SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-141 VERA C ROHRS 17602 17TH ST# 211 TUSTIN CA 92780 933-92-141 OCCUPANT 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-142 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / SALGADO, HODETH PINEDA 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-143 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LEULUAI, ALLEN 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-144 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / YEN, ANN CHI 2708 W ALHAMBRA RD ALHAMBRA CA 91801 933-92-144 OCCUPANT 2624 N TUSTIN AVE# 144 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-145 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / LICATA, CYNTHIA MTR 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# F SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-146 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC /MCBRIDE, MICHAEL DBA MC 2524 N TUSTIN AVE# C SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-147 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# D SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-148 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 2300 S LEWIS ST# 7 ANAHEIM CA 92802 933-92-148 OCCUPANT 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# 148 SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-149 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC / RUIZ, KRISTY L 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# B SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-150 RAMIREZ EVA FLORES 2622 N TUSTIN AVE# SANTA ANA CA 92705 933-92-151 JWR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 10081 SUNRISE LN NORTH TUSTIN CA 92705 City Council 23 – 176 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 177 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 178 4/2/2024

SUBJECT SITE
(SITIO DE ASUNTO) Stream Realty Partners
cordially invites you to a
Community Information Meeting.

Thursday, February 2nd
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
2370 N. Tustin Ave., Suite D,
Santa Ana, CA 92705 (Former King Superstore)
A new 3,975 square foot McDonald’s restaurant
with a drive-through located at
2101 Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, CA
The development will include parking, trash enclosure, paving and landscaping for the associated restaurant. Access will be provided from Santa Clara Avenue, along with reciprocal access to the retail center adjacent via drive aisles on the north and east.

Contact applicant for language interpretation services.

Donald Ellis
[email protected]
949.656.7051 City Council
Lic. 01876466
23 – 179 4/2/2024
SITIO DE ASUNTO Stream Realty Partners
cordialmente los invita a un
reunión de información
comunitaria.

Jueves 2 de febrero
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
2370 N. Tustin Ave., Suite D,
Santa Ana, CA 92705 (Antiguo King Superstore)
Un nuevo restaurante McDonald’s de 3,975 pies
cuadrados con un drive-through ubicado en
2101 Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, CA
El desarrollo incluirá estacionamiento, cerramiento
de basura, pavimentación y paisajismo para el restaurante asociado. El acceso se proporcionará desde Santa Clara
Avenue, junto con el acceso recíproco al centro
minorista adyacente a través de los pasillos de acceso
al norte y al este.

Póngase en contacto con el solicitante para
los servicios de interpretación de idiomas.

Donald Ellis
[email protected]
949.656.7051
Lic. 01876466
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92612
City Council 23 – 180 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 181 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 182 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 183 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 184 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 185 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 186 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 187 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 188 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 189 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 190 4/2/2024
Meeting Minutes
McDonald’s Development Project | 2101 Santa Clara Avenue 02/02/2023 Sunshine Ordinance Community Meeting #2
Purpose:

Stream Realty Partners presenting on a new proposed 3,975 square foot McDonald’s restaurant with a drive-through to be located at 2101 Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, CA.

Time:
6pm – 8pm
Location:
2370 N. Tustin Ave., Suite D, Santa Ana, CA 92705 (Former King Superstore) The Community Information Meeting was scheduled to begin at 6pm. Community members began filing into the meeting space at approximately 5:50pm. The presentation of the proposed development of the McDonald’s began at roughly 6pm. Balloons were placed outside of the meeting location to provide a visual indicator for visitors. Visitors were asked to sign in. Refreshments were provided. There were approximately 25-30 attendees from the local community.

Primary Speakers and Main Presenters during the meeting included:

Donald Ellis and Martin Pupil, Stream Realty Partners (primary applicant/owners of the shopping center) Christine Cho and Chris Stamps, McDonald’s
Jessica Steiner, Bickel and Associates (architectural firm) City of Santa Ana attending staff:

Pedro Gomez, Planning Department
Frank Bejarano, Neighborhood Initiatives
Overview:

Stream Realty Partners presented its overall vision/revitalization plan for the shopping center which includes the development of a proposed McDonalds (Phase 1) and the remodel and cleanup of the shopping center (Phase 2). The formal presentation ended around 6:38pm and an open discussion/conversation with residents lasted until approximately 7:10pm. After that, residents were encouraged to directly interact with exhibits and ask the project team questions. The below summary reflects primary questions and comments from residents as well as answers from the project team, this is not a word-for-word transcript of the meeting. Stream Realty Partners ensured, multiple times, that attending residents received business cards. Attendees were urged to reach out to the project team to further discuss the project, a few did just that in the days following the meeting.

Summary of questions and concerns:
• Will McDonald’s increase traffic along Santa Clara?
This will be identified in a traffic study which is required as part of the submittal process to the City of Santa Ana.
• Is the traffic study available to be viewed by the public? City Council 23 – 191 4/2/2024
The traffic study is part of the submittal process to the City of Santa Ana and will eventually be accessible by the public.
• Where are we in the process? Is this project approved? No, an application has been submitted and will continue to be worked through in collaboration with City of Santa Ana staff. Then, the project will next go to a Planning Commission meeting. • Is McDonald’s going to relocate the homes which are currently in the proposed location? No, the homes are to be demolished.
• Does the current homeowner(s) know of these proposed plans? Stream Realty Partners are the current owners of the two homes located on the project site. The former homeowner is deceased and next of kin, one daughter and son do not reside in the State of California. A third daughter is a local resident. Next of kin directly participated with the sale of the property to Stream Realty Partners.
• What are the proposed hours of the restaurant?
Hours are dependent on the allowable/preferred hours as determined by the City of Santa Ana. • Does the restaurant require a CUP?
Yes.
• What is a CUP?
Conditional Use Permit where the City of Santa Ana outlines conditions of use for operation. • Santa Clara turns from two lanes into one lane, if this restaurant would be built, would McDonald’s address this lane merger on Santa Clara?
No, that is not within the McDonald’s project purview though off-site improvements may be required by the City of Santa Ana.
• Is the internal shopping center traffic flow analyzed as part of the traffic study? No, the traffic study only addresses public arteries, however, Stream Realty Partners does actively look into traffic patterns within the shopping center. • Will the entrance to the shopping center on Santa Clara be widened? Potentially, yes. A slight width increase is part of the current site plan proposal. • Can McDonald’s put a light on Tustin Ave. where visitors currently have issues exiting the shopping center into existing traffic.

No, this is not within the McDonald’s purview and is on the opposite side of the shopping center. • What will McDonald’s do to mitigate loud music from young people who may be purchasing food from the drive-thru who also may perform a U-turn near residential homes? No capability to answer this question as it relies on variables that are outside of the control of McDonald’s.
• How many jobs will this McDonald’s create?
City Council 23 – 192 4/2/2024
Roughly 40 – 50 jobs.
• Homelessness is a prevalent issue; how will McDonald’s ensure this does not become a haven for homeless individuals?
There is already an existing homeless issue at the shopping center and specifically within the existing homes which are currently vacant. Stream Realty Partners has continuously documented homelessness conducting numerous acts, such as breaking and entering, as well as attempting to live on-site where the houses currently stand. New development historically deters homeless and increased lighting and consumer activity at this proposed location will not be an attractant to homeless individuals.
• How will McDonald’s mitigate the noise concerns from visitors? The site plan was created in such a way to turn activity towards the shopping center and away from residential neighborhoods.
• Why is the site oriented the way it is?
The project team has worked for many months proactively with City of Santa Ana staff to find a site plan that is palatable, operationally feasible, and aligns with consumer needs. • What kind of technology will McDonald’s be using to alleviate line stack up in the drive-thru? McDonald’s customers on average have a 3–4-minute wait time in the drive-thru, which is significantly less than its local competitors. Mobile ordering will also be available, interactive doit-yourself menu boards will be inside, and the dual-lane drive-thru is built with multiple windows specifically to increase efficiencies.
• What time will the deliveries be made to McDonald’s and where will the delivery trucks enter and exit the site?
The delivery times for McDonald’s are yet to be determined. The times will be determined upon approval of the project working cohesively with eh City of Santa Ana to make these events positive for the community.
• Who determines if the home is “of historical significance” and when? As part of the environmental review process, the City of Santa Ana will determine if any parts of the existing homes are considered to be historically significant. If so, mitigation factors will be laid out and the project team would be happy to follow them. For now, that is something that is to be determined.
• Does this project require a zone change?
Yes, the zoning is partially agriculture and would require a zone change. • How does this zone change fall into the greater housing needs for the City of Santa Ana? Currently, the City of Santa Ana is planning to meet their RHNA allocations and City of Santa Ana staff has not determined that this particular zoning change will be an issue for meeting their Housing Element Update requirements.
• What will this project mean for the wall near Stater Bros.? This project would demise that wall and increase the line-of-sight for the entire shopping center.

City Council 23 – 193 4/2/2024
• Are there other plans to update the shopping center?
Yes, this is a small but important part of the future plans for the shopping center. New tenants, signage, and plenty of opportunities to provide community benefit.

All attendees were gone by roughly 8:15pm.

City Council 23 – 194 4/2/2024
McDonald’s Development
FEBRUARY 2023
2109 E SANTA CLARA AVENUE | SANTA ANA, CA

SITE PLAN (PLAN DE SITIO)

ADJACENT

RESTAURANT
1 STORY STUCCO BUILDING
±1,858 SF
BUILDING HEIGHT: ±16'-11"

ADJACENT RETAIL
1 STORY BRICK BUILDING
±25,587 SF
BUILDING HEIGHT: ±24'-7"

ADJACENT

RESIDENTIAL

E SANTA CLARA AVE
5 9
M.O. M.O.
105' TO DT
CANOPY
12 PATIO
6 McDONALD'S
(4587
PROTO)
±3,975 SF

PROPOSED

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS

PROPOSED

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS
TE
20'-2" x
14'-11"

ENHANCED DECORATIVE
PAVING, TYP.
147' FROM THE

PICK-UP WINDOW TO

THE ORDER
POINT
113' FROM THE FROM

THE ORDER POINT TO

THE END OF THE

DRIVE-THROUGH
LANE

ENHANCED

DRIVEWAY

BIKE RACK
CAV
EV
SIGHT-DISTANCETRIANGLE AREA

STAGING
AREA
CAV
EV
TE

CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: STREAM REALTY
3161 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE
IRVINE, CA 92612
CONTACT: MICHAEL GREGG
TEL: (805) 215-6453
EMAIL: MICHEAL.GREGG@STR

SITE INFORMATION
APN: 396-261-38
SITE AREA OF PROJECT SCOPE: 35,400 SF (0.81 AC)
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: C2 - GENERAL COMMERCIAL CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT: A1 - GENERAL AGRICULTURAL
(SURROUNDING LOTS ZONED

BUILDING INFORMATION
OCCUPANCY TYPE: A-2
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB - SPRINKLERED
PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT

PARKING INFORMATION
PARKING REQUIREMENT: 8 SPACES PER 1,000 SF OF GFA
STALLS REQUIRED: 32 STALLS
STALLS PROVIDED: 35 STALLS
LEGEND:

TRASH ENCLOSURE

LANDSCAPE AREA

PROPERTY LINE PER ALTA
150' HOSE PULL DISTANCE
S

FIRE HYDRANT

WATER VALVE

GAS VALVE

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

STREET SIGN

UTILITY POLE

EXISTING BOLLARD
NOTES:

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
ACENT
AURANT

CCO BUILDING
858 SF
EIGHT: ±16'-11"
TE

CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: STREAM REALTY
3161 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 100
IRVINE, CA 92612
CONTACT: MICHAEL GREGG
TEL: (805) 215-6453
EMAIL: [email protected]

SITE INFORMATION
APN: 396-261-38
SITE AREA OF PROJECT SCOPE: 35,400 SF (0.81 AC)
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: C2 - GENERAL COMMERCIAL CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT: A1 - GENERAL AGRICULTURAL
(SURROUNDING LOTS ZONED AT C5)

BUILDING INFORMATION
OCCUPANCY TYPE: A-2
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB - SPRINKLERED
PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT

PARKING INFORMATION
PARKING REQUIREMENT: 8 SPACES PER 1,000 SF OF GFA
STALLS REQUIRED: 32 STALLS
STALLS PROVIDED: 35 STALLS
LEGEND:

A CLARA AVENUE

SITE PLAN
Scale: 1" = 20'
October 27, 2022
P:\21\21730 - McD Santa Ana2109 E Santa Clara Ave
NORTH

TRASH ENCLOSURE

LANDSCAPE AREA

PROPERTY LINE PER ALTA
150' HOSE PULL DISTANCE
S

FIRE HYDRANT

WATER VALVE

GAS VALVE

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

STREET SIGN

UTILITY POLE

EXISTING BOLLARD
City Council 23 – 195 4/2/2024
McDonald’s Development
FEBRUARY 2023
2109 E SANTA CLARA AVENUE | SANTA ANA, CA

ELEVATIONS (ELEVACIONES)
ELEVACIÓN SUR ELEVACIÓN OESTE
ELEVACIÓN NORTE ELEVACIÓN ESTE
City Council 23 – 196 4/2/2024
This space for filing stamp only
OR#:

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
State of California )
County of Orange ) ss
Notice Type:

Ad Description:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:

Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Los Angeles, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signature

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W SANTA ANA BLVD STE 812, SANTA ANA, CA 92701
(714) 543-2027 (714) 542-6841
OR 3783457

NUVIA OCAMPO

CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING AGEN
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR
SANTA ANA, CA - 92702

GPN - GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE
2101 E Santa Clara Ave.

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SANTA ANA, county of ORANGE, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of ORANGE, State of California, under date 06/20/1922, Case No. 13421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
02/14/2024
02/14/2024
ORANGE
!A000006694331!
Email

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BEFORE THE SANTA ANA PLANNING

COMMISSION
The City of Santa Ana encourages the
public to participate in the decisionmaking process. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if
you have any questions .

Planning Commission Action: The
Planning Commission will hold a Public
Hearing to receive public testimony, and
will take action on the item described
below. Decision on this matter will be final
unless appealed pursuant to Article V of
Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal
Code within 10 calendar days of the
decision by any interested party or group.

Project Location: 2101 & 2109 East
Santa Clara Avenue located within the
General Agricultural (A1) zoning district.

Project Applicant: Donald Ellis with
Stream Realty Partners (Applicant)
representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a
Texas Limited Liability Company
(Property Owner)
Proposed Project: Applicant is
requesting approval of Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) No. 2024-01 and CUP No.
2024-02, and Amendment Application No.
2024-01, to allow a zone change from
General Agricultural (A1) to Arterial
Commercial (C5), and allow for the
construction of a 3,975-square-foot fast
food eating establishment (McDonald's)
with drive-through window service and
after-hours operations (24-hour drivethrough). The site plan and related documents are available to the public for
review at City Hall at 20 Civic Center
Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701 and
on the City's website at https://www.santa-ana.org/mcdonalds- drive-through-restaurant/. Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project. The IS/MND's Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024. The City of Santa Ana has determined, based on the IS/MND, that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment with implementation of recommended mitigation measures. The IS/MND is available to the public for review at City Hall at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701 and on the City's website at https://www.santa- ana.org/documents/public-review- draft-is-mnd/. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Monday, February 26, 2024 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in person or join via Zoom. For the most up-to-date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www.santa-ana.org/planning-and- building-meeting-participation/. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to [email protected] (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or by mail to Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written
comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the
meeting. Comments received after the
deadline may not be distributed to the
Commission but will be made part of the
record.

Where To Get More Information:

Additional details regarding the proposed
action(s), including the full text of the
discretionary item, may be found on the
City website 72 hours prior to the public
hearing at https://santaana.primegov.com/public/portal.

Who To Contact For Questions: Should
you have any project questions, please
contact case planner Pedro Gomez with
the Planning Division by phone at (714)
667-2790 or by email at PGomez@santaana.org.

Note: If you challenge the decision on the
above matter, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the Planning
Commission or City Council of the City of
Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public
hearing.

Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de
llamar a Nuvia Ocampo (714) 667-2732.

N ? u c ? n liên l ? c b ? ng ti ? ng Vi ?
t, xin ?i ? n tho ? i cho Tony Lai s ?
(714) 565-2627.
2/14/24
OR-3783457#
City Council 23 – 197 4/2/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Planning and Building Agency
20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
www.santa-ana.org/pba

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BEFORE THE SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Santa Ana encourages the public to participate in the decision-making process. This notice is being sent to those who live or own property within 1000 feet of the project site or who have expressed an interest in the proposed action. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if you have any questions.

Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Decision on this matter will be final unless appealed within 10 calendar days of the decision by any interested party or group.

Project Location: 2101 & 2109 East Santa Clara Avenue located within the General Agricultural (A1) zoning district.

Project Applicant: Donald Ellis with Stream Realty Partners (Applicant) representing SRP Stater Bros, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company (Property Owner) Proposed Project: Applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2024-01 and CUP No. 2024-02, and Amendment Application No. 2024-01, to allow a zone change from General Agricultural (A1) to Arterial Commercial (C5), and allow for the construction of a 3,975-square-foot fast food eating establishment (McDonald’s) with drive-through window service and after-hours operations (24-hour drive-through). The site plan and related documents are available to the public for review at City Hall at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701 and on the City’s website at https://www.santaana.org/mcdonalds-drive-through-restaurant/.

Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the project. The IS/MND’s Notice of Intent (NOI) was posted to the County Clerk on January 12, 2024, for the required 20-day public comment period, which ended on February 1, 2024. The City of Santa Ana has determined, based on the IS/MND, that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment with implementation of recommended mitigation measures. The IS/MND is available to the public for review at City Hall at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701 and on the City’s website at https://www.santa-ana.org/documents/public-review-draft-is-mnd/.

Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Monday, February 26, 2024 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in person or join via Zoom. For the most up-to-date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit https://www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building-meetingparticipation/.

Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to [email protected] (reference the Agenda Item # in the subject line) or by mail to Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting.

City Council 23 – 198 4/2/2024
Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record.

Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal.

Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any project questions, please contact case planner Pedro Gomez with the Planning Division by phone at (714) 667-2790 or by email at PGomez@santaana.org.

Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de llamar a Nuvia Ocampo (714) 667-2732.

Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Tony Lai số (714) 565-2627. 1000’ RADIUS NOTIFICATION MAP
1,000 Sq. Ft. Buffer Map
2101 & 2109 East Santa Clara Avenue
City Council 23 – 199 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 200 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 201 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Linda Anthony <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:23 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald on Santa Clara
With all due respect I do not approve of a McDonald’s being built on Santa Clara off Tustin avenue. Concerned about traffic congestion.

Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 202 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: m r <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:15 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
I am a resident of Portola Park/E Santa Clara Ave. This McDonalds would NOT be beneficial to our neighborhood and community.

We oppose this proposition!
Thank you for your time.

Myrna Ayala
City Council 23 – 203 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: PAMELA bALIDOY <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 7:48 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Opposed to McDonalds fast food drive thru at Santa Clara and Tustin Ave I am adamantly opposed to adding a McDonald’s drive‐through at said intersection for multiple reasons.  I live in the neighborhood there is a lot of traffic, and there is a school across the street along with pedestrian traffic from the apartment who walk to the grocery store, stater brothers. A lot of the pedestrians are older people. I live in the neighborhood there is a lot of traffic, and there is a school across the street along with pedestrian traffic from the apartments who walk to the grocery store, stater brothers. A lot of the pedestrians are older people.  There have been numerous accidents in this area and that would only increase given the proximity of the existent Del taco.  Most of the people using the shopping center are not high rollers.  Even the parking lot for the grocery store and the other small stores in the center have had multiple fender bender’s.

Santa Ana keeps putting in more and more drive‐through‘s and getting rid of nicer Sit down restaurants – it’s like they’re disappearing.  It’s really rather ugly.  Why isn’t there any interest in making Santa Ana more attractive? My neighbors share my opinion it’s not safe, it only invites more collisions, including pedestrians.

You need more money – – charge the back yard breeders.  We are the people paying the property taxes, and yet it feels like we have no say in the downgrading of Santa Ana.

Please consider the people who live in this area, the children who attend the school across the street, the senior citizens, who shop there often on foot.  Plan something else but no McDonald’s at Santa Clara and tustin.  Its dangerous.

Pamela Balidoy
2604 N. Linwood
Santa Ana 92705
~ On the Wings of a Dove ~
City Council 23 – 204 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: D B <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 4:56 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s
Hello,
The traffic safety impact that a large McDonalds will have on a 2 lane street that is directly across the street from a busy Preschool and Woodlyn North Condominium complex, in addition to the Apartments and the single family homes next door will not be safe. The high majority of Santa Clara between Grand and Tustin Ave is only 2 lanes wide TOTAL, making this project unsafe for this location. I strongly oppose!
Danielle Baquing
This message was sent from a handheld wireless device. Any spelling or grammatical errors are inadvertent.

City Council 23 – 205 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Gomez, Pedro
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 4:16 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Cc: Ocampo, Nuvia
Subject: FW: New McDonalds on Santa Clara
Nuvia,
Please include this comment as part of the public comments received for the McDonald’s project.

Best,
Pedro Gomez, AICP
Senior Planner | Planning Division
City of Santa Ana | 20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex M-20 | Santa Ana, CA 92701 Phone: 714.667.2790 | Email: [email protected]
From: Dennis Barnes <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 4:15 PM
To: Gomez, Pedro <PGomez@santa‐ana.org>
Subject: New McDonalds on Santa Clara
We are not in favor of a new mcdonalds to be built on 2109 Santa Clara..... We have one located

1.59 miles from this one.... it will bring nothing but more vehicles into this area..... I know the city wants more tax revue, but we DON'T need this in our community....

Thanks..

DB
City Council 23 – 206 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Candy Bartholomew <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 7:04 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's
I oppose this project. Please protect us and our neighborhood.

Sincerely,
Candy Bartholomew
City Council 23 – 207 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Gomez, Pedro
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 8:51 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Cc: Ocampo, Nuvia
Subject: FW: McDonald's at Santa Clara Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hello Nuvia,
Please make sure this comment is included in the public hearing record for the 2/26 PC Meeting.

Best,
Pedro
From: Maureen Bayley <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 4:56 PM
To: Gomez, Pedro <PGomez@santa‐ana.org>
Cc: Dave Denny <[email protected]>; Marisela Montoya <[email protected]>; Doris Idbayeh <[email protected]>; Jenn Luckham <[email protected]> Subject: McDonald's at Santa Clara Project
Good afternoon Mr. Gonzalez,
On behalf of the members of Woodlyn North Homeowner's Association, located directly across the street from this proposed location, we protest this project.

When we have asked the City of Santa Ana for help with permits to install security gates (2030 E Santa Clara Ave) we were met with roadblocks due to the impact it would have on traffic. Our community has 87 households. Surely McDonald's will have a far greater impact on traffic at this busy intersection than our community. This is residential area and should not be rezoned to accommodate a large corporation over residents.

Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter, Maureen Bayley
Woodlyn North HOA
Treasurer
City Council 23 – 208 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Ramona Benkey <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 11:11 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's
As a resident living close to the proposed project I oppose to having a Mc Donald's build.

My major concern is the increase in traffic .

Bad location with the shopping center, preschool and apartments in close vicinity.

I hope there is a different solution.

Thank you
Ramona Benkey
1418 Grovemont
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
City Council 23 – 209 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Beverly <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 6:07 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s project
I am against the McDonald’s project going forward on Santa Clara between Grand & Tustin.

This would be a traffic safety issue since already have traffic due to a busy Preschool & large Condominium complex in this same area.  We also have a church that brings in more traffic. Also this street is an entrance to a cemetery, more traffic.

Please reconsider another area for your project.

Sincerely
Beverly George
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 210 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Bill Bonnett <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 7:38 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Against proposed McDonald’s location on Santa Clara Ave To the City of Santa Ana,
I am emailing to express my opposition to the McDonald’s that is being proposed on Santa Clara Avenue  near Tustin Avenue.

This location should not be rezoned to accommodate the commercial use of a McDonald’s restaurant.

The city just completed a very comprehensive revision to the General Plan, including zoning of all areas within the city.

The zoning of the proposed parcels were not changed during that process, and for good reason, it’s simply inappropriate to have those parcels changed to commercial use.

The McDonald’s restaurant is not a good fit for the surrounding area, as a result of the already very high traffic flow and for bicyclist and pedestrian safety concerns in that immediate area.

There are many more appropriate commercially zoned parcels that would be a much better fit for the residents of Santa Ana.

Regards,
Bill Bonnett
20 year Ward 3 resident of Santa Ana
City Council 23 – 211 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Steve Bowers <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 10:27 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Notice of Public Hearing - Project Location 2101 & 2109 East Santa Clara Ave To the Planning Commission,
Our home is located on Catalina Avenue, which is just one block from the planned location under consideration for a McDonalds restaurant at 2101 & 2109 East Santa Clara Ave. Without access the developers plans, it is very difficult to imagine a very busy restaurant at this location.
 Traffic turning right from Santa Clara onto Tustin Ave spend a lot of time waiting for busy traffic heading west on Tustin. With the addition of a busy well known establishment at this corner will only make it more difficult for patrons exiting the location onto Santa Clara to merge with busy traffic on Santa Clara turning right.  This location is precariously close to the corner of Tustin and Santa Ana. Patrons wanting to exit onto Tustin Avenue will be forced to turn right only. Obviously, many patrons will attempt to exit to the left across 3 lanes of traffic heading west on Tustin avenue.
 The location of this establishment is too close to a very busy corner.  Yes, the developers will argue that several very well-known fast-food restaurants are located just down the street at the corner of Tustin and 17th street. However, that location has a much larger lot size and flow of traffic was well planned out and does NOT conflict with traffic turning from 17th onto Tustin Avenue or flowing east on Tustin Avenue past the restaurants.

The addition of a fast-food restaurant at this location will only exacerbate an all-ready congested traffic corner.

Regards,
Steve Bowers
City Council 23 – 212 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Mindi Brawner <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 7:06 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's
Whoever sold executives on moving forward with this project must have pocketed something. This is the worst proposed area for a mcdonald's with the proposed size that is moving forward in project scope.

I have over 40 years experience in facilities construction for law enforcement and fire dept and know the importance of public safety with any other.

This is not a good idea and not a safe location. There isn't enough lanes for traffic as it is. And you wanna put a monstrosity up. I'm sure the highway patrol is also opposed.

I completely oppose this project and encourage reevaluation from a third party and with an environmental impact study.

City Council 23 – 213 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Kevin Brennan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 12:31 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s
Opposed to location for McDonalds fast food location of Tustin and Santa Clara Ave SA Ca.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
City Council 23 – 214 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Alan Britt <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 1:54 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's proposal
Definitely not a good location considering the narrow street. Already problems with In and out and chic fil a from traffic. Not a good location in my opinion and many more who I talk to. Thanks for your consideration, Alan Britt
City Council 23 – 215 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Karen Meier <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 5:29 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Proposed McDonald’s
To whom it may concern:

I am writing to urge you to stop the building project of a McDonalds restaurant on Santa Clara near Tustin Ave. in Santa Ana. This is a horrific idea and ANOTHER drive thru restaurant is NOT needed in this residential area! You have plenty of revenue generating businesses already in the area!!
Please take this consideration off the table and be mindful of what other possibilities would be better suited for this property because over‐trafficking this location would be extremely detrimental on all fronts!!! Thank you for your thoughtful and attentive sensitivity to what would be the best use of this land for the residents, existing businesses, traffic and social impact.

Sincerely,
Karen Brookfield
(A resident of Santa Ana, Tustin and Old Town Orange for 56 years) Sent from my iPhone City Council 23 – 216 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Taylor Brueseke <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 1:49 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
Dear Santa Ana City Council,
As a resident of Santa Ana since 2017, I want to thank you for the work you do keeping our neighborhoods safe and secure. It has come to my attention that there is a proposal up for debate to install a 4,000 square foot McDonalds with a double lane drive through on the corner of Santa Clara Ave and Tustin Ave. I am STRONGLY OPPOSED to this construction.

This densely populated area is across the street from the busy Plumfield Pre-school. Additionally, this area already manages a significant amount of pedestrian and automobile traffic due nearby high-density housing including apartments and condominiums. Adding the traffic of a busy McDonald’s in this location would put the safety of the families associated with the preschool as well as the residents at risk. Additionally, this intersection is a primary access point for Meridith Park residents to Tustin Ave and school busses utilize this route with nearby pick up and drop offs. Furthermore, Santa Clara is only one lane in each direction and adding a double lane drive through to this location could greatly impair traffic going into and out of Meredith Park.

I urge you to VOTE NO on any proposal to put a dangerous, high-traffic, establishment in our neighborhood.

Thank you,
Taylor Brueseke, MD
1810 Catalina Ave
Santa Ana, CA
92705
City Council 23 – 217 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: viviane buchanan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 10:28 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s
Please reconsider the possibility of putting up a McDonald’s on Santa Clara at Tustin area. I live in Woodlyn North Complex across the street from that area, and as it stands right now, traffic makes it difficult getting in and out of my complex onto Santa Clara, in either direction. We have an existing McDonald’s around the corner basically as it is. Plus a chick fillet and In and Out just around the corner on Tustin  and 17th, that already causes ridiculous traffic problems during certain hours of the day. What is the City Council thinking these days. It’s simply insanity!!! Please please please….don’t be so greedy about tax benefits, and consider the quality of life of those who live here!!! I understand a 7/11 and gas station is being considered for the corner of Santa Clara and Tustin, right next to a pre‐school, and my complex. Seriously….what are you guys thinking!!!! The health hazards are terrifying!!! Especially for the children who would be exposed to this!! Try to put any one if these next door to you, and I am sure all hell would break out!! Come on guys…you need to rethink these ridiculous ideas out, and think about the  people who live in these areas. It’s out and out bad decision making….out and out wrong!!!
City Council 23 – 218 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Elaine <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 9:59 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: No McDonald’s on Santa Clara
Hello—‐
I oppose the plan to establish a large McDonald’s in this semi‐ residential area— this project would cause additional traffic congestion and is also adjacent to a pre‐school— Please reconsider this project!
Thank you,
Sent from my iPhone
Elaine Cali
714 458‐8628
City Council 23 – 219 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: yrcasate <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:41 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
City Staff,
PLEASE do what is best for your city residents and stop the proposed McDonald's in Santa Clara Ave. This area is already very congested and adding such a restaurant will create tremendous amount of traffic. This cannot be safe for the residents in the area which is already congested during peak hours.

There is no way a restaurant like this will make the neighborhood better.

Please put your residents safety first before corporate profits and tax revenues for the city.

It the right thing to do.

Thank you,
Yuri
City Council 23 – 220 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Vannn <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 4:44 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s
This is Vanessa Charco, new home owner of one of the condos in Woodlyn Condominiums. I oppose the proposal of a McDonald’s being built across the street. My husband and I purchased this home less than a year ago as a new married couple and as young 25 year olds. Purchasing this home at a young age was a huge accomplishment for us, we took the neighborhood, preschool, and parks into consideration when we decided to purchase. Living in this community has been peaceful and has felt safe. I am delivering my baby in a few months and it scares me to think that a McDonalds is going to built right across the street. All of our savings went to a home that we thought would be safe, respected and would only grow in value. With a McDonald’s being built across the street, it causes many concerns from us, homeowners. Traffic will increase and it frightens me for my child as she grows up and wants to go for a walk or ride her bike on the side walk. What will happen when traffic rises, and speeding cars try to get their unhealthy burgers and drive while on their phones. This is not safe for my child, or the children in the preschool. The condo values will also loose value. This means that the people who spent their whole life savings to buy a condo will lose out on what they dreamed of. There will be an increase in drug addicts asking for money outside of the McDonald’s. It is not okay to have syringes and beer bottles around the neighborhood for our children, or dogs. This community is very peaceful and we have trouble with traffic at times at is. I have had moments where people are turning into the stater brothers illegally and almost hit me. Imagine how I feel as a 8 month pregnant woman carrying my first child almost getting hit. I know that with the placement of a McDonald’s it will only increase the car accidents, this is family friendly neighborhood, children will be hurt in these accidents if there are traffic jams. Aside from traffic jams, why add more fast food places that no one asked for within the 1,000 feet of living there. I saw people trying to get signatures to support McDonald’s at Portola Park from people that were just visiting the park and they didn’t even live in the community. People were signing who drove to the park, this gives me a big signal that they do not live close to the park. That day I walked to the park because unlike them, I live close the park and I did not sign because I am AGAINST the McDonald’s. We already have a McDonalds 7 minutes away, 1.2 miles away.

Why do we need another one? It is not okay to bring traffic to a peaceful community, get signatures from people who do not live in the area, cause homeowners across the street to feel unsafe in their and home and support the rise in obesity. I oppose the McDonald’s being built and I hope you take my voice into consideration.

City Council 23 – 221 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Mark Cheney <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 1:50 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s
Greetings,
As a third generation Orange Countian , And homeowner in the Foothill School district , I vehemently oppose, putting a McDonald’s on Santa Clara. We have enough problems in the area with the homeless and Other elements at the Del taco on the corner With the preschool and apartments nearby, we don’t need more traffic Please consider another use for This property
A better use would be residential townhomes, or condos or apartments Thank you for reading my opinion
Mark Cheney
City Council 23 – 222 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Donna Cramsie <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:07 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Planning Commission: Proposed McDonald's North/East Santa Ana Good Day,
I am writing to share my concerns about the proposed McDonald's on Santa Clara Avenue. As a resident of a Meredith Terrace home for 12 years, I am opposed to this fast food use in this location.

Santa Clara already has a high traffic problem during the early morning and early evening commute to schools/work on the weekdays. The lanes back up both ways during these hours, and this use would exacerbate this issue.

I am concerned about the traffic exiting this proposed site turning Right only. Although this would be safer, it will then cause people to make unsafe U turns or left turns into the streets just West of the exit for those wanting to head back to Tustin Avenue or head East on Santa Clara. Additionally, our residential egress was already reduced to 1 lane on Ridgewood due to bike lanes last year, causing more of a back up waiting for cars to turn left onto Santa Clara, which is very busy. Those turning right now have to wait for 1 car at a time to turn. Heavier traffic for those leaving McDonald's will cause more concern increasing the cars turning into our streets and causing more of a back up on this egress.

The noise pollution of this fast-food restaurant at late hours and the increased foot traffic are additional concerns. We frequent Stater Brothers and getting in & out of this parking area from Santa Clara is already congested. Plus the accidents on Tustin Avenue & Santa Clara intersection are already a constant concern, and increasing the traffic will only contribute to this misfortune. Myself and other neighbors have had accidents to no fault of ours in this very busy intersection, sadly. The added light to turn left in either direction on Santa Clara has been a benefit, thank you.

This is not a good use and for these reasons I am opposed to this McDonald's location. Please deny this proposal.

Thank you kindly,
Donna Cramsie
1917 E Avalon Avenue, Santa Ana
City Council 23 – 223 4/2/2024
2 City Council 23 – 224 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: J Cramsie <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 6:23 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Planning Commission Mtg_2024-02-26_Public Hearing Item 2 Comments To whom it may concern,
I am resident in the vicinity of the proposed McDonalds, located at the intersection of Santa Clara Avenue and Tustin Avenue. I live off of Santa Clara, across from the Santa Ana Cemetery, for over 10 years. I was reviewing the IS/MND document that was posted on the City website provided in the notice sent to my house. However, I discovered that none of the Appendies were included with the document. After much searching, I was finally able to find the appendies, through the Planning Commission Agenda. In the future it would best to included ALL the documents into a single PDF so people would not have to search for documents in multiple locations.

While reviewing the WQMP information, it notes that the infiltration rates, at 5 feet in depth, for the site are

0.22 in/hr and 0.18 in/hr, per a geotechnical report dated October 9, 2021 and that it was attached. In reviewing the geotechnical report, it references the percolation data can be found in Appendix C of the report, but it was not include, and neither was Appendix B. Without being able to review the complete document, verification of the values can not be determined and therefore, can not be confirmed. The plans show the use of underground storage chambers, that would collect the water before being pumped. The plans shown a gravel base under the chambers, it the intent to allow for some infiltration of stormwater? In reviewing the Transportation Analysis (Appendix K), several questions/concerns come to mind. The study area primarily focused on Tustin Avenue and the only analysis done for Santa Clara was the driveway to site. What about the increased traffic on Santa Clara, specifically westbound traffic from the project site due to vehicles not being allowed to turn left out of driveway? Currently the drive aisle backs up when a vehicle is trying to make the left out of the site and can not because the EB left turn pocket is stacked up. This is a concern in the AM and PM timeframes when vehicles are either access the freeway in the AM a=or return home in the PM. Vehicle who are forces to turn right out of the project site onto Santa Clara, who actually wanted to turn left, will be forces to make U-turns at existing residential streets, causing potential conflicts with residents existing their tracts.

The Queueing Summary (Table 3-2), in my opinion is flawed. In the EB, WB and NB direction, there are 2- way left turn lanes proceeding the defined turn pocket lengths and from personal experience the que of vehicles, vehicles back up into those 2-way lefts on a regular basis. Especially in the NB direction in the PM, the EB direction in the AM and PM. Also, the SB is being shown at 150 feet, but since there this is a duel left, with each lane being 150 feet, the que can be doubled.

In Section 4, how was the Trip Direction Split determined? Also, is this split representative of the AM or PM? I would think in the AM, more vehicles would be heading to the freeway and less back onto Santa Clara, which is mostly comprised of residential areas with no immediate access to a freeway. The PM would logically have more vehicles coming from Tustin Avenue, since they would be coming from freeways. Making a single assumption of the split for both conditions causes false conclusions or results of the analysis.

The analysis indicates that the drive through can accommodate 16 vehicles, however, based on the configuration, should there be a peak of over 16 vehicles, the main driveway aisle from Santa Clara to the rest City Council 23 – 225 4/2/2024
2 of the shopping center would be blocked and therefor cause a back up of vehicles, potential backing up onto Santa Clara. Also, where there a reason why only AM and Mid-Day queueing was evaluated? What about in the PM? This is a bigger concern and the peak demand to access the Stater Brother store is highest in the evening, during the 4-6 PM timeframe, which would be the same time as another peak time for the project. I analysis used 3 other project sites, but were the conditions similar to those at this location or were they just looking at the duel drive thru condition?
Per the analysis and Table 1-3, improvements are needed as part of the Horizon Year (2040), specifically a 2nd NB left at the intersection of Santa Clara and Tustin. Are the fair share fees being paid today or at the time of the improvements? What is the purpose of Section 9 of the Transportation Analysis? If the project has identified the need from improvements to existing transportation infrastructure, then it should be the developer paying for those improvements and not the City.

In conclusion, as a long time resident on the vicinity of the project, the impact from the increase traffic is a major concern and therefore I am strongly against the project as it is proposed. I am requesting the Planning Commission to deny approval of this project.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

City Council 23 – 226 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: MARK DELANEY <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 3:15 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds at Tustin and Santa Clara
** This is a very dangerous proposal considering that Plumfield Preschool and a large condo complex is directly across the street from this site. * Note * Both In and Out along with Chick Filet have double wide drive through lanes and I'm sure that most of you have seen the traffic jams trying to get in and out of these restaurants. It is also common to see private security directing the traffic into these restaurants. Imagine the traffic safety impact that a large McDonalds will have on a 2 lane street that is directly across the street from a busy Preschool and a large Condominium complex ? Then add the Apartments next door and the single family homes next to that. The high majority of Santa Clara between Grand and Tustin Ave is only 2 lanes wide ( Total ). This project is NOT safe for this location
City Council 23 – 227 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Gomez, Pedro
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 1:39 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: FW: FW: McDonald’s drive-through restaurant at Santa Clara project Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hello Nuvia,
Here’s a second comment letter to include for the McDonald’s project for the February 26th Planning Commission meeting.

Thank you,
Pedro
From: David Denny <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 1:26 PM
To: Gomez, Pedro <PGomez@santa‐ana.org>; [email protected] Subject: Fwd: FW: McDonald’s drive‐through restaurant at Santa Clara project Mr. Gomez
Good Afternoon,
Please see my original email below on the concerns and request to deny the building of the McDonald's at N.

Tustin/E. Santa Clara Ave, Santa Ana. Please make sure that my email is included in the City's Planning upcoming Public Hearing this month.

Thank you,
Dave Denny
2034 E Santa Clara Ave C1
Santa Ana, CA 92705
From: David Denny <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 9:10 AM
To: Pezeshkpour, Ali <APezeshkpour@santa‐ana.org>
Cc: Maureen Bayley <[email protected]>; Marisela Montoya <[email protected]>; Doris Idbayeh <[email protected]> Subject: Planned McDonald's site (N. Tustin Ave/E. Santa Clara Ave), Santa Ana

Ali
City Council 23 – 228 4/2/2024
2 Good Morning,

I am emailing you out of concern for the planned construction of a new McDonald's located close to the intersection of N. Tustin Ave/E. Santa Clara Ave, next to the CHP office. I am the President of the Woodlyn North community of homes that is directly across the planned McDonald's. My community's biggest concern is the severe traffic congestion the new McDonald's will create at our complex entrances and at the intersection of N. Tustin/E. Santa Clara Ave. The vast majority of Homeowners in our community are not in favor of the McDonald's being built at this location.

Several years ago, our community worked with the City of Santa Ana to construct 2 street side parking spaces at the front of our complex, after multiple Traffic studies were completed, the City deemed the traffic congestion creation of the 2 parking spaces would be too significant and did not allow for the build of additional parking.

My question is, has the City started a new traffic study for the intersection and street where the planned McDonald's is to be built ? I request that the planning commission review the past studies done for the Woodlyn North community to assist in expediting the denial of construction for the new McDonald's.

What is the best way to stay informed and updated of the City's planning commission findings and approval process for the new McDonald's ?

Kind Regards,
David Denny
2034 E. Santa Clara Ave C1, Santa Ana, 92705
(714-599-2272)
From: Debra Frederickson <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 11:40 AM
To: Jenn Luckham <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: McDonald’s drive‐through restaurant at Santa Clara project City Council 23 – 229 4/2/2024
3 Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gomez, Pedro" <[email protected]>
Date: February 1, 2024 at 11:24:00 AM PST
To: Debra Frederickson <[email protected]>
Cc: Denise Hundt <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: McDonald’s drive-through restaurant at Santa Clara project

Hello Ms. Frederickson,
Thank you for providing your comments, they have been received by the Planning Department.

Please note that your comments were received during the environmental document 20‐day public review period.  The project has yet to be agendized for a public hearing. However, it is tentatively scheduled for public hearing on February 26, 2024.

For your convenience, I have forwarded your comments to the Planning Commission Recording Secretary via email at PBAecomments@santa‐ana.org. This is to ensure that your comments are entered into the public hearing record and considered by the Planning Commission in their decision on the project.

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Best,
Pedro Gomez, AICP
Senior Planner | Planning Division
City Council 23 – 230 4/2/2024
4 City of Santa Ana | 20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex M-20 | Santa Ana, CA 92701 Phone: 714.667.2790 | Email: [email protected]
From: Debra Frederickson <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 11:02 AM
To: Gomez, Pedro <PGomez@santa‐ana.org>
Cc: Denise Hundt <[email protected]>
Subject: McDonald’s drive‐through restaurant at Santa Clara project

To Mr. Pedro Gomez, senior planner
City of Santa Ana, planning division
20 Civic Center Plaza,
Ross annex M – 20
Santa Ana, CA 92701

As a property owner of 2026 East Ave., D4, Santa Ana, I would like to express my strong opposition to adopt and approve the construction of a 24 hour drive-through restaurant, namely, McDonald’s at Santa Clara and Tustin Avenue. This is a detriment to the quality of life of all residents at the Woodland North condominium complex. A fast food, 24 hour operation would bring vehicle traffic, truck deliveries, trash pick up, increased traffic, and night lighting, that would negatively impact the residence of the area.

First and foremost, many new commercial food service businesses have opened on 17th St. and Tustin Avenue along with E. Santa Clara and Tustin Avenues. Those businesses have negatively impacted the traffic on E. Santa Clara Ave. This will lead to even more congestion, traffic hazards, significant environmental issues for the local residents and pedestrians that currently use the streets and crosswalks. The traffic is horrendous!

Additionally, this type of commercial project will negatively affect the property values to the homeowners in the area! This would be absolutely unfair! Santa Ana‘s sanctuary city status has City Council 23 – 231 4/2/2024
5 already brought unwanted crime, vagrants, and drug trafficking to our quiet community. A 24 hour operation would give those people along with other homeless or indigent people a location to loiter! We have children in our community! We have elderly in our community! We have NO protective gates, because the City won’t approve them, to keep out the kind of people that this operation, and others like it, invite into a peaceful neighborhood.

This is our home! This is our privacy! This is our peace of mind! Please help us protect ourselves… Think about how you would feel if this were in your backyard.

Sincerely,
Debra Frederickson,
Trustee, Jessie Pearson trust
2026 E. Santa Clara Ave., D 4
Santa Ana, CA 92705

Sent via email 2-1-24
City Council 23 – 232 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Ada Estevez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 12:38 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: NO MC DONALD IN SANTA CLARA & TUSTIN AVE.

HOLA MI NOMBRE ES ADA Y ME OPONGO ALA CONSTRUCCION DE ESTE RESTAURANTE YA

QUE MUCHOS ALUMNOS DE ESCUELAS DEL DISTRITO DE TUSTIN CAMINAN Y MANEJAN SU

SCOOTERS POR ESTA CALLE PUESTO QUE LA CALLE SANTA CLARA ES MENOS TRANSCITADA QUE LA 17, SO POR FAVOR PIENSE EN LA SEGURIDAD DE LOS NIÑOS, NO QUEREMOS UN

ACCIDENTE Y MUCHO MENOS UNA MUERTE SOLO PORQ USTEDES LES IMPORTA MAS EL DINERO QUE LA VIDA , GRACIAS Y QUE DIOS LOS ILUMINE EN SU DESICION.

City Council 23 – 233 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 10:38 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds on Santa Clara
We are STRONGLY opposed to the proposal to build a McDonalds resturant on Santa Clara avenue for many reasons.

Because there will be no access to Tustin Avenue there will be a LOT of cars making illegal U‐Turns on Santa Clara street.

There already is a problem with people making dangerous turns into the nearby In‐and‐Out including frequent driving on the wrong side of the road's center line.  I an only imagine how many reckless u‐turns will happen in from of the CHP office and farther down Santa Clara.  These drivers will also cut off cars turning right on Santa Clara from the Stater Brothers easement driveway.

This is a really bad location for any kind of drive‐through restaurant.

Joana and Tom Farmer
1409 Beechwood Street
City Council 23 – 234 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Susan Ford <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 3:38 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s on Santa Clara
I support the build of a McDonald’s at Santa Clara and Tustin.  That corner needs businesses who can support our community and there are many people who would use it, including me.

Susan Ford
2536 Park Lake
Santa Ana
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 235 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Diane Fradkin <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 3:24 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Proposed McDonald's on Santa Clara - Vote NO!
Dear Honorable Planning Commissioners:

I wanted to express my concern regarding the proposed McDonald's to replace the 2 historic homes at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara.

First off, the zoning isresidential at thislocation and so would require a zone change.  I believe that there is a planning reason those 2 lots are zoned residential asthe accessis poor and also close to a busy intersection (Tustin & Santa Clara).

Most quick serve restaurants are usually located at intersection corners(ie:  the Del Taco) as well as along commercial corridors.  Thislocation is neither.

Thatside of Santa Clara is already very busy with the traffic right turning and left turning in and out of the driveway at the Stater Brosshopping center.  Acrossthe street, there is a day care that is busy certain times of the day making left and right turnsin and out on to Santa Clara, along with condo and apartment housing which also generatestrip traffic during the high peak morning and evening hours.

Importantly, there isn't enough separation from the Stater Bros driveway (next to the Del Taco) from the proposed McDonald's.  The Stater Bros' driveway istoo close to the proposed accessfor the McDonald's.  Also, a traffic nightmare would develop with cars accessing McDonald'sfrom left turnsin and left turns out onto Santa Clara.  Next door, you already have that exactsituation at the Stater Bros' driveway which barely works, especially during high peak traffic hours.  Lastly, the street is not wide enough to accommodate such traffic in that location and in fact, very near the proposed location it becomes one lane on each side.

Adding the proposed McDonald's would only make for a very dangerous and potentially lethal traffic pattern.

I urge you to vote NO on the proposed McDonald's and work towards a more compatible use for the redevelopment of those 2 residential lots.

Thank you for yourservice and forsupporting the citizens of Santa Ana.

Sincerely,
Diane Fradkin
32‐year Santa Ana resident
City Council 23 – 236 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Gomez, Pedro
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 11:12 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: FW: McDonald’s drive-through restaurant at Santa Clara project Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Nuvia – Can you please make sure this comment is included in the public record for the McDonald’s project schedule for the February 26th Planning Commission meeting?
The project address is 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue:
 AA‐2024‐1
 CUP‐2024‐1; and
 CUP‐2024‐2
Let me know if you have any questions.

Best,
Pedro
From: Debra Frederickson <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 11:02 AM
To: Gomez, Pedro <PGomez@santa‐ana.org>
Cc: Denise Hundt <[email protected]>
Subject: McDonald’s drive‐through restaurant at Santa Clara project To Mr. Pedro Gomez, senior planner
City of Santa Ana, planning division
20 Civic Center Plaza,
Ross annex M – 20
Santa Ana, CA 92701
As a property owner of 2026 East Ave., D4, Santa Ana, I would like to express my strong opposition to adopt and approve the construction of a 24 hour drive-through restaurant, namely, McDonald’s at Santa Clara and Tustin Avenue. This is a detriment to the quality of life of all residents at the Woodland North condominium complex. A fast food, 24 hour operation would bring vehicle traffic, truck deliveries, trash pick up, increased traffic, and night lighting, that would negatively impact the residence of the area.

First and foremost, many new commercial food service businesses have opened on 17th St. and Tustin Avenue along with E. Santa Clara and Tustin Avenues. Those businesses have negatively impacted the traffic on E.

Santa Clara Ave. This will lead to even more congestion, traffic hazards, significant environmental issues for the local residents and pedestrians that currently use the streets and crosswalks. The traffic is horrendous! Additionally, this type of commercial project will negatively affect the property values to the homeowners in the area! This would be absolutely unfair! Santa Ana‘s sanctuary city status has already brought unwanted crime, vagrants, and drug trafficking to our quiet community. A 24 hour operation would give those people along with other homeless or indigent people a location to loiter! We have children in our community! We have City Council 23 – 237 4/2/2024
2 elderly in our community! We have NO protective gates, because the City won’t approve them, to keep out the kind of people that this operation, and others like it, invite into a peaceful neighborhood.

This is our home! This is our privacy! This is our peace of mind! Please help us protect ourselves… Think about how you would feel if this were in your backyard.

Sincerely,
Debra Frederickson,
Trustee, Jessie Pearson trust
2026 E. Santa Clara Ave., D 4
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Sent via email 2-1-24
City Council 23 – 238 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: George Kris <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 10:21 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Mcdonald's
I'm extremely concerned about the proposal to build a McDonald with a double wide drive ‐through west of the intersection of Tustin Avenue and Danta Clara in Santa Ana. The chief issue at stake is traffic safety for the entire community. including the large Woodlyn North Condominium complex where I reside, the Plumfield Preschool, and two apartment compexes.  The second concern is increase in noise pollution and loitering that often takes place with late‐ night fast food establishments.

George Kyriakidis
2030 E.Santa Clara Avenue, Unit H1, Santa Ana, CA 92705 City Council 23 – 239 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Robert Guevara <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 12:05 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds - Traffic SAFETY is the primary issue - 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Hello,
I am a resident of the condominiums that are across from this project, we would like to not have this move forward with as the streets are one lane on each side and will drive the already pressing issues of homeless members around the neighboring preschool.

There are lot of elderly people in the vicinity as the roads will be congested and unable to drive through if this project is moved forward with.

Please take this email into consideration of the community to not move forward with this project.

Thank you
Robert Guevara
City Council 23 – 240 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Rhonda Hain <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 8:59 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds NO! NO! NO!
NO!!!! NO!!!!! Please!
Santa Clara Street CANNOT Handle the additional traffic! The high majority of Santa Clara between Grand and Tustin Ave is only 2 lanes wide ( Total ).

Not to mention the addition of very late night & early AM traffic which will certainly impact the theft and burglary problems we already have in all the open carports directly across the street and a private community swimming pool frequently used by the homeless.

All these problems will be magnified by this MacDonalds being allowed to operate in this residential communty! Current Santa Clara traffic issues and concerns include:

1. Access to and from Plumfield Daycare

2. Access to Stater Brother shopping center

3. CA Fire department access to get to Tustin Ave.

4. Cemetary accesses.

5. Numerous condo and apartment complexes access.

No parking is allowed on the majority of Santa Clara as there is not enough room for fire and emergency equipment to pass safely.

This project is NOT safe for this location.

Thanks for your time to listen.

Rhonda Hain
2030 E Santa Clara Ave., N3
Santa Ana, CA
714-360-3479
City Council 23 – 241 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Brittany Hills <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 1:39 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: No to McDonald’s
Hello,
I’m writing this is regards to the idea of building a McDonald’s on the corner of Tustin and Santa Clara in Santa Ana.

This is NOT a safe idea! It would make this street/intersection very busy and dangerous to the community.  Preschool across the street, young kids in the condos right next to these houses.   I vote NO on McDonald’s! Respectfully,
Brittany
City Council 23 – 242 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Denise Hundt <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 7:31 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s
We live on Santa Clara. The traffic is a problem already. Why on earth would we need a fast food drive through restaurant that would jamb up traffic more than it is now. The food is horrible and bad for your health and children growing up on that junk food is the worst way for them to eat. Teach them to eat healthy food that’s good for their well being. We love our city and instead of wasting money on a fast food restaurant is completely wrong. We need to get the homeless off the streets, sidewalks ,and bus stops. Every day becomes worse and unsafe for people to live here. No McDonald’s! We don’t want you near our neighborhood! Stay out! we certainly don’t need another fast food place here.

Very concerned resident for the future of our city Santa Ana.

Sent from my iPad
City Council 23 – 243 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Gomez, Pedro
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 8:50 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Cc: Ocampo, Nuvia
Subject: FW: McDonald's Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hello Nuvia,
Please make sure this comment is included in the public hearing record for the 2/26 PC Meeting.

Best,
Pedro
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: Doris Idbayeh <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 8:04 AM
To: Gomez, Pedro <PGomez@santa‐ana.org>
Subject: McDonald's Project
Hello, I’m a homeowner at Woodlyn North.  My husband and I are against this proposal for a McDonald’s to be built in our neighbor hood. This would have a high impact of traffic in this area.  It already has enough traffic, trying to get into our complex at peak hours can be very difficult. So I’m extremely opposing this project.

Best Regards,
Doris Idbayeh
City Council 23 – 244 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Johnson, Erin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 9:04 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
Hello,
I’m wriƟng to oppose a new McDonalds being built on Santa Clara/TusƟn next to the CHP.  Santa Clara is a small street with a preschool right across from the proposed locaƟon.  The last thing that area needs is a restaurant where homeless people will be hanging out across from a preschool.

Thank you for your consideraƟon.

Erin Johnson
Representative - Outside Sales/OEM Division
office 714-779-0500 | cell 714-277-9531 | [email protected] 5055 East Landon Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807-1945
City Council 23 – 245 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:49 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: : MacDonalds
Sent using the mobile mail app
On 2/21/24 at 5:45 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > Please do not approve MacDonalds on Santa Clara and Tustin. > > We strongly oppose the proposed zone change and building on MacDonalds on East Santa Clara and Tustin Av. > > Traffic is our main objection. Please listen to the residents and voters of Santa Ana > >
> > Thank you
> > Jane Johnson
> > Sent using the mobile mail app
>
City Council 23 – 246 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Alyssa Jones <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:43 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
Good morning I am a homeowner at 2030 E. Santa Clara unit F2, and I firmly oppose the building of the proposed new McDonald’s on the lots currently at 2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara Avenue in Santa Ana.

That point of Santa Clara is primarily residential. To put a 2472 Lane Dr. through restaurant across the street from a preschool a condo complex and next to an apartment complex is a safety and nuisance issue.

The completion of this project will devalue all of the condos and surrounding home and put the residences at greater risk of petty theft, burglary, traffic accidents, congestion, and light pollution.

That area of the block is too close to the intersectThat area of the block is too close to the intersection of Tustin and Santa Clara in order not to cause a giant back up trying to access the drive-through.

Not only will this project, destroy home values and put children at risk, it will create traffic back ups, increased litter, and an overall decline in the area.

Do not allow these currently residential lots to be destroyed by a mega project better suited for a main commercial/retail area.

Thank you,
Alyssa Jones and Richie Walsh
949-903-6013

City Council 23 – 247 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Patricia Kane <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:16 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: No Mac Donald’s on E Santa Clara Santa Ana
It is unfair to all the residents in the area.

1. The two lane road with bike lanes can not accommodate all egress traffic turning West on Santa Clara then making U turns at the tiny intersections. Not to mention how difficult it will be for residents to turn west onto Santa Clara from the condos and Meredith homes.

2. The left turn from Tustin Av to Santa Clara will be stacked up waiting to get into the parking lot 3. Turning into Stater Brothers from Santa Clara will be difficult 4. The City just spent millions on the bike lanes, new disability curbing, narrowing the entrances to the neighborhood,  this project would not work safely with the new bike lanes.

5. I also oppose changing the zoning to accommodate a corporation.

6. The preschool has been there for many years. More traffic will affect parents picking up their kids safely.

It not a safe project from a traffic standpoint The neighborhood is against it.

James and Patricia Kane
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 248 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Sean Keegan <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 7:24 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Support for the planned McDonalds
I have seen a movement on Next Door to protest the planned McDonalds being proposed just West of the intersection of Tustin Ave. & Santa Clara in North / East Santa Ana because of “traffic safety” concerns.

I just wanted to voice my support for this plan. A McDonald's in this area would be a great thing! Just my two cents. Reading the comments it is more a protest because of some people’s rabid McDonald’s hatred rather than any rational reasoning, in my opinion.

Thank you for listening.

Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 249 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Nicole Komanapalli <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 9:03 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Proposed McDonald’s project on E. Santa Clara- NO! Safety issue! To whom it may concernThe McDonald's project- being proposed on East Santa Ana. IS a ** Traffic SAFETY issue ** This projects location where the two historical homes (2101 and 2109 E. Santa Clara) and next to the easement that is behind Del Taco is too compacted. There us too much congestion where Santa Clara going West from Tustin Ave. turns from 2 lanes down to 1 lane. In addition, there are too many pedestrians crossing Santa Clara and Tustin Avenue, which is unsafe. ** This is a very dangerous proposal considering that Plumfield Preschool and a large condo complex is directly across the street from this site.
* Both In and Out along with Chick Fil-A have double wide drive through lanes and the traffic jams trying to get in and out of these restaurants is very challenging..

The traffic safety impact that a large McDonalds will have on a 2 lane street that is directly across the street from a busy Preschool and a large Condominium complex is an unsafe and ridiculous proposal.

In addition, with the Apartments next door and the single family homes next to that. The high traffic location of Santa Clara between Grand and Tustin Ave is only 2 lanes wide ( Total).

This project is NOT a safe location and we do not need another fast food restaurant in our community.

Please do not place this restaurant in that location!
Nicole Komanapalli
949-635-9965
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 250 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: George Kris <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 12:53 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald Project Safety Concern
I'm strongly opposed to McDonald's Project in our neighborhood for multiple well known safety reasons.

George Kyriakidis
Get Outlook for Android
City Council 23 – 251 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Richard Larriva <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 9:20 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Opposition to Proposed McDonalds Restaurant at 2101 & 2109 Santa Clara The plan to build a McDonald’s restaurant at the above location will result in traffic congestion for the preschool immediately across the street, the condominiums and houses in close proximity to the restaurant.  Recognizing that this project is a Stater Brothers joint venture, nevertheless access to the Stater Brothers market that is poor at best will be all the more difficult with a fast food restaurant with force through immediately adjacent to the only other market access and egress.

Additionally, the proposed 24/7 operation will expose the preschoolers and adjacent condo residents to noxious odors from frying meat and other deep fried food cooking exhaust 24 hours a day.

Rick Larriva
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 252 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Maurita Lavy <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 3:21 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s on Santa Clara proposed - No
Please do not allow zoning change to commercial. The drive way, parking and traffic are already an issue.  There is a preschool across the street and school bus stop on Santa Clara.  Children’s safety should be top priority.  How about allowing a four plex or leave existing houses. There is a shortage of housing. There is no shortage of fast food.

Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 253 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: M Gay Leja <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 4:41 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: MCDONALDS
Please don't build a MCDONALD'S at that location. Traffic is bad enough already, the preschool is right across the street, there is a Senior community nearby and many of the residents shop at the nearby Stater Bros, the cemetery is just down the street and Santa Clara has only one lane in each direction from Tustin to Grand.

PLEASE reconsider and put it somewhere else.

Thank you.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
City Council 23 – 254 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: ARACELI Madrid <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 9:06 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Stop Macdonalds
Terrible idea Santa Clara is narrow street.  Traffic is bad now I can’t imagine a McDonalds.  So many options on 17th why Santa Clara.

Araceli Casate
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 255 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Mary Maduena <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 8:05 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald
As a resident of Santa Ana, I oppose the the construction of the McDonald’s on Santa Clara. That land is not zone for commercial purposes and two homes that are there, are at least 100 years old, should be preserved and not torn down.

The intersection of Santa Clara and Tustin Ave is already a busy intersection, adding a fast food restaurant will only compound the problem.

Thank you,
Mary Maduena
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 256 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Malissa R <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 8:41 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's project/ Santa Clara
McDonald's project/ Santa Clara
As a resident I am not looking forward to this project, if all approved. I live directly across the street, I love where I live and our neighborhood. My patio balcony looks over exactly right into where that McDonald's is suppose to go.

I can't really say I would be pleased with that sort of view every single day. Having my morning coffee having to look out and see a fast food restaurant.

At night it would no longer be peaceful and dark, it would be loud and bright. Just a big glow of a McDonald's arch.

If I didn't live directly across the street, I wouldn't be as concerned. Getting into my drive way to my complex will be a nightmare on a 1 lane each way street.nits busy enough as it is.

Turning left on Santa Clara from Tustin to go home would be way too much of this McDonald's is approved.

I would seriously consider having to move out of the area.

Thank you for your time in reading my concerns, Malissa City Council 23 – 257 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Skip Van Der Marliere <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:39 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Support McDonalds on Santa Clara
Count me in as local resident and supporters of the McDonald's on Santa Clara, near Tustin Ave Gil Van Der Marliere
City Council 23 – 258 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: elizabeth marr <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 7:54 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's
Hello,
I'm a resident located on Santa Clara and Tustin. Please note, I'm opposed to the McDonald's intended to be put in.

Best,
Elizabeth
Phone: 9496146851
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
City Council 23 – 259 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Carol Mastro <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:19 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
I strongly OPPOSE this McDonalds project proposed for just west of Tustin Ave and Santa Clara in Santa Ana.

This is a HORRIBLE location for a McDonalds, as the road narrows from two lanes to one.   There is a preschool and a large condo complex directly across from this site.  Also apartments and single family homes.  The traffic congestion is already bad during commuting times, but will be unbearable if this project goes through.    Add to the traffic issues the safety concerns.  There have been numerous accidents, including fatalities, on Tustin north of 17th where people enter and exit the new Chick‐Fil‐a and In & Out.   And that location is on multiple lane major roads!!!   People continually make illegal left turns out of those businesses onto Tustin, creating a terrible hazard.  I can only imagine the things people will do in trying to enter and exit a McDonalds on a very congested two lane road.

PLEASE, for the safety and well being of our residents, and especially our children, STOP this project!!!!! Respectfully,
Carol Mastro
Go Mortgage, Inc
(714) 585‐9295
[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 260 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Nancy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 9:35 PM
To: eComments, PBA; Gomez, Pedro
Subject: Agenda Item 2: McDonald's on Santa Clara
Dear Planning Commissioners,
I am writing to urge that you deny the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed McDonald's project on 2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara St. I am a property owner across the street at 2030 E Santa Clara Ave, and I am very concerned about this project due to the nuisance it will create in the neighborhood in terms of traffic, smell, and noise. This is a fairly peaceful and quiet area, and adding a McDonald's would go against the residential fabric of the neighborhood. This would create a different scenario than the Del Taco, given the Del Taco is across from the vacant lot on the Southwest corner and on the corner of the arterial (Tustin), not to mention within the shopping center. The McDonald's would be directly across from a condominium complex and a preschool, and would cause unwanted disturbances to both. It is not technically on an arterial street, and should not be allowed a C5 (Arterial Commercial) designation. Furthermore, the land use would eliminate agricultural land, which could be developed as a community garden or micro-farm that would bring more public benefit to the area, which has many families and children in the condos and apartment complexes. We do not want another fast food establishment in this area - there are already many with the newer ones that went up on 17th and Tustin. Please don't turn our neighborhood into an unhealthy one by design. Our families deserve access to healthy food and air free of the strong smells that come with fast food joints.

I am highly opposed to this project. Please do not approve the McDonald's in this location.

Sincerely,
Nancy Mejia

City Council 23 – 261 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Malissa R <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 8:41 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's project/ Santa Clara
McDonald's project/ Santa Clara
As a resident I am not looking forward to this project, if all approved. I live directly across the street, I love where I live and our neighborhood. My patio balcony looks over exactly right into where that McDonald's is suppose to go.

I can't really say I would be pleased with that sort of view every single day. Having my morning coffee having to look out and see a fast food restaurant.

At night it would no longer be peaceful and dark, it would be loud and bright. Just a big glow of a McDonald's arch.

If I didn't live directly across the street, I wouldn't be as concerned. Getting into my drive way to my complex will be a nightmare on a 1 lane each way street.nits busy enough as it is.

Turning left on Santa Clara from Tustin to go home would be way too much of this McDonald's is approved.

I would seriously consider having to move out of the area.

Thank you for your time in reading my concerns, Malissa City Council 23 – 262 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Marisela Montoya <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 5:41 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's proposal on Santa Clara and Tustin - I OPPOSE! Hello.

My name is Marisela Montoya. I have been living at Woodlyn North Condominiums since 2004.

As a resident of Woodlyn North, I absolutely oppose the McDonald's being proposed just West of the intersection of Tustin Ave. & Santa Clara in North / East Santa Ana. Traffic SAFETY is the primary issue but, not the only issue. This is a very dangerous proposal considering that Plumfield Preschool and our condo complex are directly across the street from this site.

For years we at Woodlyn North Condominiums, right across the street from this proposal, have been trying to get gates and the city has ALWAYS denied our request, claiming that we are going to cause traffic issues. How is it that a McDonald's is not? I can assure you that McDonald's would cause a gigantic problem with traffic in our residential area. I'm sure that the city of Santa Ana is aware of both In-N-Out and Chick Filet located on the corner of Tustin Avenue and 17th Street which have double wide drive through lanes cause tremendous traffic jams every day, and it is a challenge trying to get in and out of these restaurants. It is also common to see private security directing the traffic into these restaurants. Imagine the traffic safety impact that a large McDonalds will have on a 2-lane street that is directly across the street from a busy Preschool and a large Condominium complex? Then add the Apartments next door and the single-family homes next to that. The high majority of Santa Clara between Grand and Tustin Ave is only 2 lanes wide ( Total ). This project is NOT safe for this location and your help is needed to decline/cancel it forever.

The investors applying for a McDonald's in our community don't care about us dealing with issues a McDonald's will cause, they don't live in our community. We are people that can only afford living in this area, unlike them. We take pride of our community and a McDonald's across the street is not safe.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Best Regards,
Marisela Montoya
562-397-7040 Mobile
City Council 23 – 263 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Andrea Nishihara <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 6:41 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
I OPPOSE the McDonalds proposal to construct a large McDonalds. Our neighborhoods will be negatively impacted with congestion and quality of life, including noise pollution, and potentially attracting unsavory activities that often come with late-night fast food food establishments. With respect from the neighborhood please listen to us and tell McDonalds to find a location that would not harm our neighborhood with excessive traffic, congestion, and noise.

Andrea Nishihara
[email protected]
City Council 23 – 264 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Sharon Pearson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 3:25 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
To whom it may concern,
As a 10 year resident of Merrideth Terrace and 26 year resident of Santa Ana near Santa Clara, I oppose the McDonald's project being discussed on 2/26/24.   The roads have just recently been altered to be safe for cyclists, pedestrians and drivers alike (thank you for that) … but adding a business like McDonald’s to the mix is a safety hazard.

Please help keep our neighborhood safe … vote against this project!!!!!   A McDonald’s is better suited away from the residential area!!!
Thank you for listening!
Sharon Pearson
Catalina Ave, Santa Ana
City Council 23 – 265 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Petra Petry <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 9:10 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Opposed to the McDonalds Project on Santa Clara Ave in Santa Ana Hello,
I live on this street. This project is absolutely NOT SUSTAINABLE for this Location, so I am writing to you to oppose a 4,000 sq. ft. McDonalds with a double wide drive through being proposed just West of the intersection of Tustin Ave. & Santa Clara in North / East Santa Ana. ** Traffic SAFETY is the primary issue **
This is where Santa Clara Ave. where I live going West from Tustin Ave. turns from 2 lanes down to 1 lane. The traffic in this area is already bad.
** This is a very dangerous proposal considering that Plumfield Preschool and a large condo complex is directly across the street from this site. * Note * Both In and Out along with Chick Filet have double wide drive through lanes and I'm sure that most of you have seen the traffic jams trying to get in and out of these restaurants. It is also common to see private security directing the traffic into these restaurants.

Imagine the traffic safety impact that a large McDonalds will have on a 2 lane street that is directly across the street from a busy Preschool and a large Condominium complex ? Then add the Apartments next door and the single family homes next to that. The high majority of Santa Clara between Grand and Tustin Ave is only 2 lanes wide ( Total ). This project is NOT safe for this location and the fast food location with high traffic should NOT build.

I hope you understand the concerns of people that live here and take this in consideration, because this project is NOT SUSTAINABLE - Santa Ana Board should not support it.

Please, reach out to me if you have any additional questions.

Thank you for your time, and have a great day!
Petra Petry, Ph.D.

World Languages Instructor
949-351-0347
Beauty & Skin Care on Budget
Help us Fundraise for OCSA! Your kind referrals are much appreciated! City Council 23 – 266 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Daniel and Guadalupe Ramirez <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 10:10 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Tustin and Santa Clara McDonald
Hello
I oppose the proposal of building a McDonald on the Santa Clara / Tustin site. It’s already a congested corner with people trying to turn left into Stater Bros Two beautiful properties, too bad they will be torn down.

I oppose!
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 267 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Mike Richman <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:16 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald's on Santa Clara west of Tustin
I don't approve of this location because of the high traffic increase. The cars leaving the Stater Bros parking lot that have to turn left or right onto Santa Clara have a problem now from the high traffic coming off of Tustin.

Cars leaving the parking lot on the Tustin Ave. side can now turn left onto Tustin causing problems because of the traffic light at Tustin and Santa Clara.

If the parking at the proposed McDonald's is too small, the customers will have to park at Del Taco or Stater Bros.

Thanks,
Mike Richman
Woodlyn North HOA
2030 E. Santa Clara
2030 E. Santa Ana
City Council 23 – 268 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:34 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Proposed Mc Donalds Restaurant on Santa Clara
Dear Honorable Chair and members of the Planning Commission; Tonight you will decide whether to reinforce the “quiet enjoyment of hearth and home” or the commercial interests of a party who believes that the local neighborhood isn’t deserving of this quiet enjoyment.

This parcel could be refurbished as the historic farmstead that it is, perhaps even adding one or two ADU’s and it would not have the effect upon the surrounding neighborhoods like this fast food restaurant.   Just because it abuts the backside of the Stater Bros. shopping center is not grounds for foisƟng this type of commercial acƟvity on these surrounding neighborhoods.  Podocarpus trees could be planted along that eastern property border and in three years you would have a 50’ tall green wall.  The car traffic, the deliveries at all hours of the night and day the constant squawking of “do you want fries with that order?”  It is simply unfair to do this to this area.    The incursion of commercial acƟvity further west on Santa Clara I believe is not wise in the long term.   One excepƟon begats another and preƩy soon our good intenƟons have paved the way to hell in terms of the quality of life.

Keep the commercial acƟvity along TusƟn where it belongs.   Ask yourselves, “If I lived nearby is this what I would want to experience”?  I think you each know the answer.   Please vote NO on this request.

Sincerely,
Tim Rush
Chairman  G‐7 Neighborhood Leaders Alliance
Fromer President Washington Square and Wilshire Square NA’s 38 year resident
Tim Rush
Chief People Connector
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties
The Maple Building, Corporate Offices
16911 South Bellflower Boulevard
Bellflower, CA 90706‐5903
(714) 299‐4455
17 Branch Sales Offices, Serving 6 Southern California Counties City Council 23 – 269 4/2/2024
2 City Council 23 – 270 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Alicia Sabillon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:03 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
I write this email to oppose a proposal to build a McDonalds at 2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Ave.  I live in Woodlyn North, the condominium complex across the street from that address.  I am very concerned about the the potential increase in traffic on a street that is already very congested.  We already have difficulty getting in or getting out of our condominium complex due to the amount of traffic on this part of the street.  Sometimes it’s impossible to get in our driveways due to all the cars in line waiting for the light at the intersection of Santa Clara Ave and Tustin Ave.  This is a two lane street and the cars also make a line in the center‐divided to either get into the Stater Bros parking lot or to make a left turn on Tustin Ave.  The construction of the Mcdonalds not only going to create more traffic, it is going to create more noise and pollution.  In addition,  a 24 hour drive through is going to bring more homeless to our neighborhood, we already have homeless problems, we do not need more.

I oppose to the construction of McDonalds at 2101 and 2109 E Santa Clara Ave.

Thank you for listening to my concerns.

Alicia Sabillon
City Council 23 – 271 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: ROGER SHORTALL <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 4:21 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Cc: Roger Shortall; winston Covington
Subject: McDonalds
I am absolutely against having McDonalds on that small corner causing many traffic problems.  It is a safety problem for the school across the street, condos & apartments.

This is insane on a 2 lane neighborhood, cemetery street & I will oppose strongly.

I will be at the HEARING!
Roger Shortall
Meredith Terrace Home Owner
[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 272 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Paola Silva <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 9:09 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Stop MCdonalds
We oppose to McDonalds Project on Santa Clara and tustin! All the best,
Paola Silva
Local resident
City Council 23 – 273 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Sally Sison <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 6:57 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds on Santa Clara
Please, we DO NOT need another fast food place on Tustin Ave.

The traffic is already congested from the preschool, condos and apartments, not to mention Starbucks and Del Taco at the same intersection.

Isn't there another location for your McDonalds, that is not near a residential neighborhood? What a nightmare a McDonalds would bring to this area but we all know that corporations like you don't give a crap about traffic, it's all about profits.

Please consider another location.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
City Council 23 – 274 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Joyce Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 9:19 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s Project
I’m not sure who is completing the EIR for this project, but with the two lanes going west on Santa Clara and merging into one lane, and people making left turns out of Stater Bros. parking lot there have been multiple accidents and back up of traffic without another fast food restaurant. Also, the City of Santa Ana just added the In‐&‐Out and Chik‐A‐Filet just down the street. Do we really need more fast food restaurants? Please reconsider.

Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 275 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: tafeuer (null) <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 1:54 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: No McDonalds on Santa Clara!!!
I DO NOT support the new McDonalds location on Santa Clara ‐ it is unsafe and will snarl traffic on the narrow road.

There is also NO NEED for one since the one on Lincoln and 17th is a mile away.

Since the new Chick Fil A, In n Out, and Cane’s went in nearby I have been cleaning up food bags and litter left by people who park in my neighborhood to eat, and then leave their trash in the gutter. This will only get worse as the McDonalds would be even closer to my neighborhood.

Please do not allow this development to progress!
Tom Feuerborn
City Council 23 – 276 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Diego Teran <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 8:43 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds on Santa Clara Ave
Dear City Officials,
As a neighbor in Meredith Terrace, I strongly oppose the McDonalds project on Santa Clara Ave.

There’s a McDonalds at 17th & Lincoln and traffic is terrible when I drive my kids to school. We don’t need another fast‐ food restaurant in the neighborhood.

Thanks,
Diego Teran
City Council 23 – 277 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Mike Thaete <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 9:39 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonalds
Hello Planning Committee,
This email is to oppose the building of McDonalds at the corner of Tustin/Santa Clara in Santa Ana. I believe this building will cause a dangerous traffic situation.

Please do not allow this proposal to move forward.

Mike Thaete
1809 Catalina Ave.

Santa Ana, CA 92705
City Council 23 – 278 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: The Paw Spa <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 11:24 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Stop McDonald's on Tustin in Orange
We don't need a fast food company that microwaves paper thin patties and charges $18 for a Big Mac Meal !!! Put a Lazy Dog restaurant or some other restaurant we all can enjoy for breakfast lunch and dinner . There's barely any restaurant chains here .

Get Outlook for iOS
City Council 23 – 279 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: jeanne Troup <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 6:14 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s
I am against building another giant fast food at Tustin and Santa Clara. It will not be safe, traffic‐wise and will cause a lot of congestion.

Thank you.

Jeanne Troup
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 280 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Cynthea Vaglienty <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 7:16 AM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: McDonald’s proposal Tustin Ave and Santa Clara Putting a McDonald’s at this location , would bring more traffic and homeless to the area.

This is a residential area has enough going on. How do I know this, I live here.

This would not benefit the area. We have all we need in this area on Tustin Ave.

Cynthea Vaglienty
Sent from my iPhone
City Council 23 – 281 4/2/2024
1 Ocampo, Nuvia
From: Richie Walsh <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:21 PM
To: eComments, PBA
Subject: Macdonalds
To whom it may concern
I am very concerned about the potential negative impacts a McDonald's could have on my neighborhood, such as increased traffic and issues related to homelessness.

I have two teenage kids that reside here, I believe having a MacDonalds across the street would impact their sense of safety while walking in our complex and while enjoying the pool in the summer time.

Already the intersection of Santa Clara and Tustin is an extremely busy traffic intersection with a del Taco on the corner and a very busy Stater brothers grocery store. Adding a Macdonalds would create a nightmare senario with regards to traffic congestion
Respectfully
A Resident of Woodland North community
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
City Council 23 – 282 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: DavidO. <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday,
To: eComment
Subject: Urgent Concern: Proposed McDonald'sDevelopment onESantaClaraAve Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearSantaAnaCityCouncil Members,
Ihope thismessage finds youwell. Asaresident ofWoodlyn North Condominiums, Iamreaching outto express mydeepconcerns regarding theproposed construction ofaMcDonald'srestaurant at2101and2109E.

SantaClara Avenue, directly opposite myhome.

Theproposed siteislocated onasmall, three-lanestreet, withthecenter laneserving asashared turning lane forbothdirections. Thisconfiguration already presents challenges forresidents, andtheintroduction ofahightraffic business suchasMcDonald'swillundoubtedly exacerbate these conditions. Theinevitable increase in vehicular traffic, coupled withfrequent stops andturns associated withfast-fooddrive-through services, poses a significant risktothesafety andflowoftraffic onourstreet.

Moreover, theproximity ofthisproposed McDonald'stoapreschool isdeeply troubling. Theintroduction ofa fast-foodrestaurant soclose toafacility caring forourcommunity'syoungest members raises concerns notonly about increased traffic hazards butalsoabout thepotential influence ontheirdietary habits andhealth.

Given these considerations, Irespectfully urgetheSanta AnaCityCouncil toreject theproposal forthe McDonald'sdevelopment at \[Exact Location orAddress\]. Ibelieve itisimperative toprioritize thesafety and well-being ofourresidents, especially ourchildren, overtheshort-termeconomic gainsofnewdevelopments. I amconfident thatthere arealternative locations within ourcitythatcould accommodate suchabusiness without compromising public safety orthequality oflifeinresidential neighborhoods.

ItrustthattheCouncil willgivedueconsideration totheseconcerns andprioritize thewell-being andsafety of SantaAna'sresidents initsdecision-making. Iamkeentofollow uponthismatter andamavailable forany further discussion orclarification thatmaybeneeded.

Thank youforyourtimeandattention tothisimportant issue.

Warm regards,
DavidOh
SantaAnaCA, 92705
Sincerely,
DavidM. Oh
Contact: ( 2
City Council 23 – 283 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: DavidDenny <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sPlanned Site - N. TustinAve/E. SantaClaraAve Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

GoodAfternoon,
Iamemailing yououtofconcern anddenial forapproval fortheplanned construction ofanewMcDonald's located closetotheintersection ofN. TustinAve/E. Santa ClaraAve, nexttotheCHPoffice. IamthePresident oftheWoodlyn North Community ofhomes thatisdirectly across theplanned McDonald's. Mycommunity's biggest concern isthesevere traffic congestion atthenewMcDonald'swillcreate atourcomplex entrances and attheintersection ofN. Tustin/E. Santa ClaraAve. Thesecond concern isourCommunity'sSafety with theincrease oftheHomeless loitering attheMcDonald's, asthere aremany thatusethegrass lawnoftheDel Tacolot, andthe "green way" encampments next totheMontessori School.

Thevastmajority ofHomeowners inourcommunity arenotinfavoroftheMcDonald'sbeing builtatthis location.

Several yearsago, ourcommunity worked withtheCityofSantaAnatoconstruct 2street sideparking spaces at thefrontofourcomplex, aftermultiple Traffic studies werecompleted, theCity deemed thetraffic congestion creation ofthe2parking spaces would betoosignificant anddidnotallowforthebuildofadditional parking.

Irequest thattheCityCouncil review thepaststudies donefortheWoodlyn North community toassist in expediting thedenial ofconstruction forthenewMcDonald's.

KindRegards,
DavidDenny
SantaAna, 92705
1 City Council 23 – 284 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: BradYates <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, AM
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sdevelopment StaterBroscenterorcornerofSantaClara/Tustin ave Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Iamsupporting thisproject.

Jobs tothecommunity almost 100newjobsatthenewstate minimum wage of $20perhour Willdeter homelessness atthecurrent vacant houses
Would compliment theCenter overall.

Thanks,
1 City Council 23 – 285 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Hoyt, Bob <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds atStaterBros
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Thisisafineaddition totheareaPleaseexpeditedevelopment Thankyou!
SentfrommyiPhone
2 City Council 23 – 286 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: ChadDixon <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: Support forProposed McDonald’satSantaClara/TustinAve Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

ToWhom itMayConcern:

Iamwriting toexpress mysupport fortheproposed McDonald’sdevelopment attheStaterBros center onSanta Clara/TustinAve. This project isasignificant opportunity forourcity, promising tobring many jobsandrevitalize the area. Itreduces thenumber ofunhoused individuals around thecurrent old, vacant houses. While shopping attheretail center, Ihavepersonally encountered unhinged individuals whoappear tobeondrugs thatcamp outbehind theunsecure houses.

Furthermore, itwould notonlycomplement theshopping center, butalsoinvigorate ourcommunity economically and socially. Ibelieve inthepositive impact thiswillhaveonSanta Anaandurgeyoursupport foritsrealization.

DidyouknowoneineightAmericans haveworked atMcDonalds?
Thank youforconsidering mysupport forthisproject.

Sincerely,
ChadA. Dixon Jr.
3 City Council 23 – 287 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: IanArmbruster <ianarmbruster24@gmail. com>
Sent: Wednesday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sdevelopment StaterBroscenterorcornerofSanta Clara/Tustin ave Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Iamreaching outtoexpress mystrong endorsement oftheproposed McDonald’sdevelopment attheStater Bros center onSanta Clara/TustinAve. This initiative presents aremarkable opportunity forourcity, withthe potential togenerate numerous jobopportunities andbreathe newlifeintothesurrounding area. Notably, it offersasolution totheissue ofhomelessness byrepurposing theexisting old, vacant houses, thereby contributing tothealleviation ofhousing insecurity within ourcommunity.

Inaddition toitseconomic benefits, theintroduction ofMcDonald’swould serve toenhance theoverall appeal oftheretail center while fostering asense ofvibrancy andsocial cohesion within ourneighborhood. Having personally witnessed thechallenges posed byindividuals struggling withsubstance abuse whoseek refuge behind these unsecured properties while shopping atthecenter, Iamconvinced ofthepositive impact thatthis development could haveonpublic safety andcommunity well-being.

Ifirmly believe inthetransformative potential ofthisproject andurge youtolend your support toitsrealization forthebetterment ofSantaAna.

Best,
IanArmbruster
4 City Council 23 – 288 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: susan bloomfield <sbloomfield67@gmail. com>
Sent: Wednesday, March
To: eComment
Subject: Support forMcDonald’sDevelopment Project atStaterBrosCenter Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearSanta AnaCityCouncil:

Iamwriting toexpress mystrong support fortheMcDonald’sdevelopment project proposed fortheStater Broscenterlocated atthecorner ofSantaClaraandTustinAve. Ibelieve thisproject willbringsignificant benefits andpositive changes toourareabyenhancing thelocaleconomy andcontributing totheoverall improvement ofthecommunity
JobCreation: Thisproject willhave asubstantial positive impact onjobcreation inourcommunity. With approximately 83jobsexpected tobecreated atthenewstateminimum wageof $20perhour, itwillprovide much-needed employment opportunities forourresidents, contributing toeconomic growth andstability.

Addressing Homelessness: TheMcDonald’sdevelopment project willbecrucial indeterring homelessness by revitalizing currently vacant houses inthearea. Bringing newbusinesses andjobopportunities willhelpcreate amorevibrant andinclusive community, reducing theprevalence ofhomelessness inourneighborhoods.

Complimenting theCenter: Additionally, theMcDonald’sdevelopment willcomplement theoverall aesthetics andfunctionality oftheStaterBroscenter. Itwillenhance thecenter'sappealtoresidents andvisitors alike, further solidifying itsposition asathriving hubofactivity withinourcity.

Warm regards,
SusanBloomfield
5 City Council 23 – 289 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: MikeAdams <madams@streamrealty. com>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sdevelopment StaterBroscenter
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hello, Iamalarger supporter oftheproject.

Theproject willbringnorthof80jobstothecommunity (withthenewstateminimum wage of $20perhour). The existing homes havehomeless encampments andareasecurity risk. TheCenter wouldcompliment theCenter andCity / community overall.

Thanks fortheconsideration.

Mike
MikeAdams
6 City Council 23 – 290 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Peter Joyce <PeterCJoyce@outlook. com>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: ESanta ClaraMcDonalds
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Theprivate business ofMcDonalds, especially being a24houroperation, willhelpridtheareaofthe homelessness andassociated crime thatcityofSantaAnarefuses todealwith.

Ihave livedintheimmediate vicinity andstrongly support theproposed McDonalds development.

PeterCJoyce
Mob
7 City Council 23 – 291 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Jennifer Dietz <jenniferdietz83@yahoo. com>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sDevelopment | StaterBrosCenter onCornerofSantaClara/TustinAve Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

ToWhomitMayConcern,
IamwritingtoexpressmystrongsupportfortheproposedMcDonald’sdevelopmentattheStaterBrosCenteronthe cornerofSantaClaraandTustinAve.

Thisprojectpromisestobringnumerousjobstoourlocalcommunity, eachofferingthenewstateminimumwageof $20 perhour. Theseemployment opportunitiesnotonlycontributetoourlocaleconomy, butalsoprovidemuch-needed stabilityforindividualsandfamilies.

Additionally, thepresenceofMcDonald’scouldserveasadeterrenttohomelessness, addressingapressingsocialissue inourarea.

Furthermore, theadditionofMcDonald’swouldseamlessly complementtheexistingcenterorsurroundingarea, enhancingitsappealandprovidingconvenientdiningoptionsforresidentsandvisitorsalike.

Inconclusion, Ibelievethatthisdevelopment alignswithourcommunity'sgoalsforeconomicgrowthandrevitalization.

Thankyouforyourconsideration.

Thanks!
JenniferDietz
1 City Council 23 – 292 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Brianna Mchenry <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sDevelopment
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

GoodAfternoon,
Iamwriting toexpress mysupport fortheproposed McDonald’sdevelopment attheStaterBros center on Santa Clara & TustinAve.

Avacant building isharming theareaanddrawing unhoused individuals tothearea. Thisdevelopment will deter homeless andalsobringsomany newjobstothecommunity. Itistherighttypeofrestaurant forthisarea andwillbewidely usedandnicely maintained.

Ihopetoseethisproject move forward.

ThankYou,
Brianna McHenry
2 City Council 23 – 293 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: TinaBurton <tinambtinaboowill@gmail. com>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: Mcdonalds development atstaterbrothers shopping center Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Towhomitmayconcern,
MynameisTinaandIdomostofmyshoppingattheStaterBrothersonSantaClaraiamlookingforwardtoa Mcdonalds goinginasitwouldcleanupthatareaanditwouldalsogivemeanotherchoiceforfastfoodIhaveseenalot ofhomeless hangingaroundthosehousesandwouldliketoseethemgoneThankyou 1 City Council 23 – 294 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Frankmoraga <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: NewMcDonalds development atStaterBros. Shopping Center Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

AsaresidentandavoterinthecityofSantaAna, Icompletely supportthesiteforthenewMcDonalds. Goodfor families, youngpeoplelookingforgoodjobs, andgivethelocalcommunity anewlifelinefortaxrevenue.

ThankYou, FrankM
SentfrommyiPhone
2 City Council 23 – 295 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Angelica Torres <angiemtorr2005@gmail. com>
Sent: Wednesday, March
To: eComment; Flores, David
Subject: April2publiccomment
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearCouncilmembers ofSantaAna,
Ithascome tomyattention thattheCityCouncil hasfailed tounderstand theimportance ofchildcareinour community.

Asaparent andlifetime resident ofourvibrant city, Iamtroubled bythescarcity ofassistance resources available tochildcareowners andfamilies inneedofcare.

Childcare providers face numerous challenges tosimply keeptheir vitalbusinesses alive. Their businesses contribute tothehealth andgrowth ofnotonlyourchildren, butthefuture ofourcommunity. Child care workers areanextremely important andnecessary piece inthedevelopment ofathriving city, yetyouchoose nottoshowsupport forthisindustry which trulydoesn’tmakesense, considering howintrinsic andvitalquality childcare istoeconomic development.

CityCouncil, please prioritize funding tobolster thestateofchildcareinSantaAna, ensuring thatevery child hasaccess tosafe andnurturing care.

Thank youforyourattention tothismatter.

Kindly,
Angelica Torres
3 City Council 23 – 296 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: BradKollar <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sDevelopment atTustinAve.

Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

ToWhomitMayConcern,
IamwritingtoexpressmyfullsupportfortheproposedMcDonald'sdevelopmentattheStater BrothersShoppingCenter, strategicallysituatedonTustinAve & SantaClara. Thisproject representsasignificantopportunityforourcommunity'sgrowthandcohesion, andIbelieveitwill bringnumerousbenefitstobothresidentsandbusinessesalike.

Firstandforemost, theadditionofMcDonald'stotheStaterBrothersShoppingCenterwill undoubtedlycontributetothecreationofjobopportunitieswithinourcommunity. Aswecontinue tonavigatethrougheconomicchallenges, theprospectofnewemploymentopportunitiesis particularlywelcome. NotonlywillthisdevelopmentprovidedirectjobswithintheMcDonald's establishmentitself, butitwillalsogenerateindirectemploymentopportunitiesthroughitsimpact onsurroundingbusinesses.

Moreover, theinclusionofMcDonald'sintheshoppingcenter'sofferingswillenhancetheoverall cohesionandattractivenessofthearea. Bydiversifyingtherangeofamenitiesavailable, the centerwillbecomeamoreappealingdestinationforresidentsandvisitorsalike. Thisenhanced attractivenesshasthepotentialtostimulateeconomicactivitywithinthecommunityandbolster thevitalityoflocalbusinesses.

Additionally, theproposedproject'splantoremovetwoexistingnonconformingdrivewaysalong SantaClaraisacommendableinitiative. Thisactionwillnotonlyimprovetrafficflowandsafetyin theareabutalsocontributetotheaestheticenhancementoftheshoppingcenter. Bystreamlining accesspoints, thedevelopmentwillcreateamoreefficientandvisuallypleasingenvironmentfor patrons.

Inconclusion, IbelievethattheMcDonald'sdevelopmentholdsimmensepromiseforour community. Italignswithoursharedgoalsofeconomicprosperity, jobcreation, andenhanced urbanplanning. Therefore, Iurgeyoutogiveyourfullsupporttothisproject, recognizingthe significantbenefitsitwillbringtoourcommunity.

Thankyouforconsideringmyperspectiveonthismatter.

Sincerely,
BradKollar
4 City Council 23 – 297 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: SteveRiordan <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds atTustin andSantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Goodevening,
IwanttovoicemysupportforthenewMcDonaldsattheStaterBrothersShoppingCenter. Itwouldcomplement the areawellandbringjobstothecommunity.

Regards,
SteveRiordan
SentfrommyiPhone
5 City Council 23 – 298 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: AnitaHolland <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds Development atTustin & SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Asaresident andvoterinSantaAnaIaminfavorofthis. Already homeless people areoccupying theempty houses inthearea.

Iamafrequent shopper attheStaterBros storeandwould loveanother option forfastfood. Also itwould provide morejobopportunities andtaxmoney tothecity.
6 City Council 23 – 299 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: TylerWellborn <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds intheStaterBrothers Shopping Center
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hello,
I'mwritingtosupport theMcDonalds attheStaterBrothers Shopping CenteratTustinAveandSantaClara .

Firstofallitwillbegreatfortheshopping centerhelping torounditoutandafterallwhodoesn'tloveahot McDonalds hashbrowninthemorning. Ithinkitisagreat spotforthosewhoneedajobinthecommunity. My kidslovethechickennugget happymealsandIlovetheclassic cheeseburger andfrieswhenyouareonthe go. Inaddition, havingstudied theplanitappears thatitwillremovetwoexisting nonconforming driveways alongSanta Clarawhichshouldimprove trafficflow. Please approve thisproject.

Thank you,
TylerWellborn
email
7 City Council 23 – 300 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Jenkins Bender <jenkinsbender@gmail. com>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: Support forMcDonald'sDevelopment atStaterBrothers Shopping Center Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hello,
Iamwriting toexpress mysupport fortheMcDonald'sdevelopment attheStaterBrothers Shopping Center located onTustinAveandSanta Clara. Having aMcDonald'satthislocation would aidjobsinthecommunity, make theshopping center more cohesive withmore offerings forthecommunity, andremove thetwoexisting nonconforming driveways alongSanta Clara.

Thank youforyourconsideration,
Jenkins Bender
8 City Council 23 – 301 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: DaleTodd <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’srestaurant atTustin & Santa Clara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

I’mwriting insupport ofthenewMcDonalds attheStaterBrothers shopping center. Thenewrestaurant willbenefit the community byadding jobsandenhancing thecenter overall. Itwould alsocleanup thenonconforming driveways on SantaAna. Iurgethecitycouncil toapprove thisproject.

DALE
9 City Council 23 – 302 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: MattWade <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sdevelopment StaterBroscenterorcornerofSanta Clara/TustinAve Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

ToWhom ItMay Concern,
Iamemailing togivemysupport fortheMcDonald'sdevelopment project.

Points ofEmphasis forthisProject:

Adds approximately 83jobsatthenewstateminimum wage of $20perhour.

Willdeter homeless atthecurrent vacant houses.

Would compliment theCenter overall.

Sincerely,
MattWade | Director ofProperty Management

PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL
10 City Council 23 – 303 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: TaylorN. Adams <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sdevelopment StaterBroscenter
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hi,
Iamabigsupporter ofthisproject.

Theproject willbringnorthof80jobstothecommunity (withthenewstateminimum wage of $20perhour). The existing homes havehomeless encampments andareasecurity risk. TheCenter wouldcompliment theCenter andCity / community overall.

Thanks fortheconsideration. Thiswilldeter homelessness atthecurrent vacant houses aswell.

BestRegards,
Taylor Adams, Sr. Account Executive, The
Judge Group
Irvine, CA92606
cell ( www.judge.com |
https://www.linkedin.com/in/taylornicoleadams/
Click tolearn more about Judge’sTechnology, Talent, & Learning Solutions 11 City Council 23 – 304 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Joseph Fiss <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sdevelopment StaterBroscenterorcornerofSantaClara/Tustin Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Thank youfortheopportunity tocomment onthisproject.

Ihavehadtheopportunity toreview theplansandIfullysupport thisproject. Asaveteran professional land useplanner, itisclearthisdevelopment willhaveanoverall benefit tothecommunity andtheCityofSanta Ana.

Theprojectwillremove theattractive nuisance ofvacant homes, making theneighborhood safer.

Thedevelopment willincrease theassessed valuation oftheproperty, providing increased property taxes totheCity.

Thedevelopment willprovide approximately 83directjobsatthenewState Minimum Wage, notto mention indirect jobsforproduct delivery tothesiteandfooddelivery fromthesite.

Thedevelopment willprovide additional sales taxtotheCity.

Thedevelopment willimprove traffic safetybyremoving twounsafe driveways fromSanta Clara Avenue
Thedevelopment willbeintegrated intotheexisting shopping center.

Iurgeyoutoapprove thisproject forthebenefit oftheneighborhood, community, andCityofSantaAna.

Warm Regards,
JoeFiss, MSOL
Director ofPlanning andEntitlements

TW LAND PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, LLC
1068 E. Main Street, Suite 225
Ventura, CA93001
m:
e:
12 City Council 23 – 305 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: MattKatz <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday,
To: eComment
Subject: Voicing Support forMcDonalds Development - TustinAve. & SantaClara Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

ToWhomitMayConcern:

Iamwritingtoexpressmysupportfortheproposed McDonald’sdevelopment attheStaterBroscenteronSanta Clara/TustinAve. Thisprojectisasignificant opportunity forourcity, promising tobringmanyjobsandrevitalizethe area. Itreduces thenumberofunhoused individuals aroundthecurrentold, vacanthouses.

Furthermore, itwouldnotonlycomplement theshoppingcenter, butalsoinvigorate ourcommunity economically and socially. IbelieveinthepositiveimpactthiswillhaveonSantaAnaandurgeyoursupportforitsrealization.

Thankyouforconsideringmysupportforthisproject.

Sincerely,
MattKatz
B.S. RealEstate, CSUNorthridge
Broker License #02116469
13 City Council 23 – 306 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: GregSmithson <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds onSantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Imforit!
SentfrommyiPhone
1 City Council 23 – 307 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Chelsea Jones <contact.chelseajones@gmail. com>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: Development ofMcDonald’satStaterBrothers Shopping Center Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Hello,
MynameisChelseaJonesandIamwritinginsupportforthenewconstruction ofaMcDonald’sintheStaterBrothers ShoppingCenteronSantaClaraandTustinAvenue. Iama28-yearresidentofSantaAnaandamincredibly dedicatedto thedevelopment, prosperity, andgrowthofmycity. IbelievethiswouldbeanexcellentadditiontoourSantaAna community. Notonlyisthislocationverycentraltoourcommunity giventhatitisnearfreeways, busstops, andour localpolicestation, butitwouldbeabeautifuladdition toandhelpmodernize thelookofthecenterinwhichitis proposed. ThereisanearbyStarbucks, DelTaco, andmanyothersmallbusinesses whowouldbenefitfromthe additional patronagethisbusinesswouldbring. Additionally, thisdevelopment willhelpbringmorejobstoSantaAna residentsandgeneratemoretaxrevenueforthecityitself, whichwouldultimatelybegreatforourcommunity andits residents. Additionally, thebusinessbeinglocatedintheproposed locationwillhelpdeterhomelessness inthe surrounding homes, apartments, andbusinesses. Iaminfullsupportofthenewproposed McDonald’sbeing constructed inthiscenterfortheoverallgoodofthecommunity, city, andresidents. Thankyouforyourtime! Best,
ChelseaJones
3 City Council 23 – 308 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: HunterStarkey <hunterstarkey@gmail. com>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sdevelopment StaterBroscenter - MySupport Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

I'dliketooffermysupport totheabove referenced project forthecommunity. Ithink thiswould doagreat job ofcomplimenting theoverall Center aswellasbringabunch ofjobstotheCity, which isalways abigplus. I think thefactthatitalsowilldeteralotofthehomeless atthecurrent vacant houses isagreatwinfortheCity too. Please consider approving thisdevelopment.

Hunter Starkey
1 City Council 23 – 309 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: CandiKoonce <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sproject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

TotheCityCouncil
Myfamilyhaslivedinthisareasince1979. Wehaveseensomuchchangeinthearea. Somegood. Somenot.

TodayasIchooseagrocery storeItrytoavoidStaterBrothers. Thisisbecauseitisdownright dangerous tryingtoturn intotheparkinglotoffSantaClara.

Betweenthecars, notenoughlaneroom, theflowerlady, homelessandthesignal it’sjustamess!! Nowtheywanttointroduce aMcDonald’sinthatarea? Why?
Wehaveone1.6milesfromthatspot! Ithinkwehavewaytoomanyfastfoodplaceswithina1.5mileradius. Dowe reallyneedanother? Andthisareawouldbeaskingforanincreaseinaccidentsorevenfatalities.

Pleasereconsider notapproving aMcDonald’shere.

Surelythereisacalmerandbetteruseofthislandthatiszoned “agricultural”.

Maybethelandownerscouldexpandthestripmallwithotherinteresting shops. Wedon’tneedmorefastfood!! Pleaselistentotheneighbors thathavetoputupwiththetrafficandnoiseandSMELLofthis. Thereisalreadytoomuch greasesmellaround.

Thankyou
CandiKoonce
St
SantaAna
2 City Council 23 – 310 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Dennis <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’s
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Please listen tothepeople, weofJessie Lopez’sdistrict doesn’twantanother McDonald’sinourarea. Ifthe council don’tknowitalready, there isabout 25eating places within amileofthisplace andwe haveone1.6 miles fromthisone. Please doaswerequest, andreject thisproject. Weknow it’saboutthemoney for city. Butwelivehere, andwedon’tneed moretraffic andcongestion onthatcorner. PLEASE LISTEN TO US!
Thx.
3 City Council 23 – 311 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Jim <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, PM
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearSantaAnaCityCouncilMembers:

Iamstronglyopposedtotheproposed McDonalds atonSantaClaraStoffofTustinAvenue, forthefollowingreasons :

1. SantaAnajustspentagreatdealofmoneyputtinginbikelanesandsidewalks, andrestriping thetwolane road. Theincreaseintrafficwillbecomeasafetyhazard.

Evennowthemergingfromtwolanesheadingwesttoonelaneisaproblem, imagineonehundredormorecars mergingtogowesteveryhour, mergingintoonelane. SantaClaraisresidential Street.

2. Thepreschool hasparentscomingandgoingduringtheday, whichaddstothetraffichazardwhiletheyare turningintothepreschool.

3. McDonald’segressontoSantaClaraisproposed asarightturngoingwestonSantaClara. Iwillneverbeableto makealeftturnoutofmyMeredithTerraceneighborhood.

4. Itiszonednowasagriculture, theproposed rezoningseemstowantthatpropertytomatchupwithzoningon TustinAv. ItisnotonTustinAvenue. SoIdon’tfeelitshouldbezonedcommercial.

5. Iworryabouttheproximity totheCHP, theyareconstantly goinginanout, aswellasthenearbyapartments andcondosonSantaClara.

Pleaseconsiderrejectingthisproposal, asmostofmyneighbors andtheentireneighborhood opposeit.

Thankyou
JamesKane
4 City Council 23 – 312 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: David Jackson <davidejackson100@gmail. com>
Sent: Friday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

I'mopposed totheMcDonald'srestaurant atTustin/Santa Clara.

Myhome iswithin walking distance totheproposed project site.

1. Santa Claraisaone-lane-each-wayroad; trafficwilllikely back-uponSantaClara asMcDonald'spatrons que-upforthedrive-through.

2. Theadded traffic, ingeneral, onthissmallroad, isnotappropriate.

Watching closely tohowthissituation getsresolved.

Thank you,
Dave Jackson
5 City Council 23 – 313 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Pat <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, 47PM
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds ProjectatTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearSantaAnaCityCouncil,
Iamrequesting thatyounotapprove theproposed McDonalds project.

Ibelievetheincreased trafficonSantaClara, theproblemsmergingfromtwolaneswestintoonelane, willbedangerous becauseof theincrease oftrafficfromMcDonald’sexitgoingwestontoSantaClara.

Mostoftheresidentsareopposedtothis, andIhopeyoulistentoourvoice.

Thankyou
PJohnson
6 City Council 23 – 314 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Pat <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, PM
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProjext Tustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

SantaAnaCityCouncil:

IopposetheprojectatSantaClaraandTustinAvbecauseofthetraffichazards. Pleasehelpustokeepour neighborhood safe.

IamnothappywiththeincreasetrafficgoingwestonSantaClara, theUturnsatthefirststreettheycometo, difficulty forthe
Residents turningwestonSantaClarafromtheMeredithTerracetract.

PleasevoteNO
Thankyou
PatKane
7 City Council 23 – 315 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Pat <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, PM
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearSantaAnaCityCouncil;
Iurgeyoutovotenoontheproposed McDonalds. Iopposeitbecause oftheincreased trafficonSantaClaraandthe safetyoftheneighborhood.

Thankyou
GStark
8 City Council 23 – 316 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Jim <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, PM
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Pleasedonotapprove theproposed McDonalds onSantaClara.

Theincreaseintrafficisasafetyhazard. SantaClaraisatwolaneroadexceptfortheareabyStaterBrothers driveway. Mergingintoonelanewillmostlikelyincreasetrafficaccidents.

Newbikelaneshavejustbeenaddedtoencourage morebiking. TheadditionofalltheMcDonalds trafficheadingwest willcertainlymakethestreetmoredangerous, bothforbikes
Andautosenteringandexitingthesidestreets. Ialsodonotwanttoseemorefastfoodtrashinmyneighborhood, whenpeoplestopandeatinfrontofmyhouseandthrowtheirtrash
Inmyyard.

PleaseVOTENO
Thankyou
JPKane
9 City Council 23 – 317 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: PK <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

PleaseVoteNOontheProposed McDonald's
Iamstrongly OPPOSED totheMcDonalds project, duetotheincreased traffic and safety problems. Itwillbedetrimental tothesurrounding neighborhoods. thank you
Jackie Stark
10 City Council 23 – 318 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Patricia Kane <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

PleaseVoteNOontheProposed McDonald's
Iamstrongly OPPOSED totheMcDonalds project, duetotheincreased trafficand safety problems. Itwillbedetrimental tothesurrounding neighborhoods. thank you
JaneKane
11 City Council 23 – 319 4/2/2024
lores, Dora
From: Amy *** <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday,
To: Lopez, Jessie; eComment
Subject: Mcsonalds project onsantaclara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Wedontwantitorneedit.

SantaAnaneedshousing, notmorefastfood.

Thetrafficcoming inandoutofthecenterwillmakeSantaClaramuchmoredangerous. Jaywalkers coming fromapartment complex toMcdonalds willbeyetanother hazard.

Donotrezone housing tocommercial!
VOTENO!
AAnderson
portolapark resident
Nlyonst@outlook. com
12 City Council 23 – 320 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Christine Eastwood <ceastwood574@gmail. com>
Sent: Saturday, March30,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

ToWhom ItMayConcern
Withregard totheproposed zoning change toallow McDonald’stobuildagiant4,000sqft. fast-foodrestaurant onthe twoproperties justwestofthecorner ofSantaClara andTustinAvenues, myhusband andIarevehemently opposed to thisplan. Werealize thattheprojected taxrevenue isveryattractive tothecity, butatwhat costtothose ofuswhowill bearthebruntoftheincreased traffic along analready busy street andintersection.

Directly across thestreet fromtheproposed location isPlumfield Preschool. Traffic turning intoandcoming outofthat school asparents dropoffandpickuptheirchildren willbemade significantly moredifficult withtheaddition ofa McDonalds andthetraffic itwillgenerate. Itisalready challenging attimes tonavigate through theareawiththecars dodging around oneanother astheycome andgofromtheshopping center and/orattempt togetintotheleftturnlanefor Tustin Avenue. Traffic already backs upattimes inthecenter lane.

Furthermore, thereisalready alargenumber ofcarsthatuseSanta Clara asanalternative “ quick” waytotravel between Tustin andGrand Avenue. Theonesignal thathasbeeninstalled atWright Streethelps some, butnotenough. Toinvite yetmoretraffic ontothisstreet thathasthemajor ingress andegress points intotheSanta AnaandFairhaven Cemeteries seems ludicrous. It’salready verydangerous forpeople coming outofthecemetery andtrying toturnontoSanta Clara. Wehaveseenanumber oftraffic accidents onSanta Clara nearRidgewood because someone wasgoing toofastor justdidn’tseeacarcoming out. Thishasbeenbrought tothecity’sattention onseveral occasions, butto-datethereisno action.

Andfinally, theamount oftrashthatwillbegenerated byyetanother fastfoodrestaurant should bementioned. Those of uswholivealongSanta Clara arealready subject tofolkssimply dumping theirusedcups, wrappers, bags, anduneaten foodontoourproperty justbecause theyfinditeasierthan holding onto ituntiltheygethome orfindatrashcan. We already haveaproblem withthisfromtheotherfastfoodrestaurants surrounding ourneighborhood. Icannot evenbegin toimagine whatthisnewbusiness willgenerate. Anditwon’thave tobepicked upbythebusiness, itwillfallonus, as residents. When webought ourproperty in1985, wechose thislocation because itwasaniceneighborhood filledwith homes andsome apartments. Wearemostassuredly notinterested inhaving youturnitintoafastfoodcourt thatgrows everclosertoourdoorsteps.

Werespectfully askthatyoudoNOTchange thezoning. Helpuskeepourneighborhood intact. Wedonotneedanother fastfoodchain restaurant anywhere nearthislocation.

Respectfully submitted,
Wallace andChristine Eastwood
13 City Council 23 – 321 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Rickkirbo <rickkirbo@roadrunner. com>
Sent: Saturday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sproject #23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Istronglyopposethisunsafeprojectbroughtintoourneighborhood. IhavelivedintheMeridithhomesfor25years now. TheamountofunsafetrafficthiswouldbringtoSantaClaraisunbelievable.

Thisprojectwouldbeirresponsible tofavorrevenueoverpublicsafety.

RickKirbo
SantaAna
SentfrommyiPhone
14 City Council 23 – 322 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: ARACELI Madrid <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sproject item # 23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

IhavelivedintheareaforalongtimeandSantaClaraisaverynarrowstreetasitstrafficcanbebadattimes. The construction ofMcDonald’swillcreateatrafficdisaster. Theproposed locationalreadysuffersparkingproblemsand trafficjamswithstaterbrosandDelTacointhecomplex. McDonald’sisahugefranchisewhycan’ttheybuildon17th whichisamuchwiderstreetwhybuildinsuchanarrowandresidential Neighborhood. Thisisridiculous andoutof control. Corporations overpeopleonceagain. Wecan’tallowthistohappeninourarea. Plzreconsider notallowing McDonald’stocomeinthisverynarrowstreet.

Thankyou
AraceliCasate
SentfrommyiPhone
15 City Council 23 – 323 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Janice LaVelle <janicelavelle519@gmail. com>
Sent: Saturday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds Project Item23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearCityCouncilMembers,
I'malongtimeresidentat1750Sherry, #19, SantaAna.

I’vesadlybeenwatchingandexperiencingthecontinueddeclineoftheneighborhoodforthe9yearsI’velivedhere.

Thecontinuedencroachingoftheunhousedintoresidences, theirsleepingonthelocalstreetsandsidewalks, theeverincreasingcrimeandburglaryrate, andincreasedviolenceareallmonumentalissueswhichyouMAYNOTbeableto overcomeeasily.

BUTyouCANaddressthelatestsuggestedneighborhooddisruption.

ThatistheMcDonaldsonSantaClara. WEDONOTNEEDANYmorefastfoodrestaurants, oranymoretrafficina residentialarea.

ThelovelyresidencesonSantaClaraarehistoricalandcreateaneighborhoodcharm.

Apreschoolwithparentaltrafficwouldbeadverselyaffected.

TheInNOutandChickFilAon17thandTustinhavecreatedatrafficandcongestionnightmaremanyhoursofthedayand nite. I’veseenseveralaccidentsthere.

PleaseprioritizeyourvotingconsituentsandresidentsaboveMcDonalds.

Janice LaVelle
16 City Council 23 – 324 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: DiegoTeran <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March
To: eComment
Subject: NoMcDonalds onSantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

CouncilmembersofSantaAna,
Asaresidentofthecity, Iwanttorequestthatyoudenytheconstruction ofaQSRrestaurantinaresidential area. We alreadyhaveaMcDonaldsonLincoln, andtrafficthereisatrocious foruswhenwedriveourkidstoschool.

SantaClaraisanarrowstreetandcarsturningtherewouldmakeitdifficulttodrive.

Thanksyou,
DiegoTerán
ResidentofMeredith Terrace
17 City Council 23 – 325 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: DavidKiwerski <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March
To: eComment; Lopez, Jessie
Subject: McDonalds Project - Item # 23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Towhomitmayconcern:

Thisprojectwouldbewherethetwohomes ( oneishistorical ) arelocatedat2101and2109E. SantaClaraandnext totheeasementthatisbehindDelTaco. ThisisalsowhereSantaClaragoingWestfromTustinAve. turnsfrom2 lanesdownto1lane.

ThisisaVerydangerousproposalconsideringthatPlumfieldPreschoolandalargecondocomplexaredirectly acrossthestreetfromthissite. * Note * BothInandOutalongwithChickFilethavedoublewidedrivethrough lanesandI'msurethatmostofyouhaveseenthetrafficjamstryingtogetinandoutofthoserestaurants. Itisalso commontoseeprivatesecuritydirectingtrafficintotheserestaurants.

Imaginethetraffic / safetyimpactthata4,000sq. ft. McDonaldswithdoubledrivethroughlaneswillhaveona2 lanestreetthatisdirectlyacrossthestreetfromabusyPreschoolandalargeCondominium complex ??? Thenadd thetheApartmentsnextdoorandthesinglefamilyhomesnexttothat... ThehighmajorityofofSantaClarabetween GrandandTustinAve. isONLY2laneswide ( Total ). ThisprojectisNOTSAFEforthislocation Itravelthisareaeveryday, andIhaveseenhowtrafficisworseeveryyear. Thelastthingweneedisanotherpoint ofcongestion.

Sincerely,
DavidKiwerski
SantaAna 92705
DavidKiwerski "NoMicrosoft, noApple, justgoodoldreliable Linux" 1 City Council 23 – 326 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: CaroleBurke <caburke1430@yahoo. com>
Sent: Sunday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject - Item # 23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

ToWhom ItMayConcern:

Theincreased trafficandtraffic jamsthatwouldbecaused bybuilding aMcDonald'sby TustinAve. andFairhaven wouldmakeadangerous situation. Traffic isalready badin thatarea. EntryandexittoandfromStaterBros. wouldbemademoredangerous thanit already is. Tustin isalready toocrowded andisoftenriskytodriveon. PLEASE donot allowMcDonalds tobuildanother fast-foodrestaurant inthislocation. In-And-Out, farther southonTustin, hasalready madethisstreetmoredangerous. Ihopethatyouwilluse goodjudgment andwillnotendorse McDonald'splans.

CaroleA. Burke
Orange, CA92866
2 City Council 23 – 327 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: TinaNashick <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sproject-item #23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Please. Thisisabadanddangerous idea. Iwasabusiness owner, TustinPetVillageonthecornerofTustinandSanta Claraforover20years. Wewatched astrafficincreased howmanymoreaccidents occurred. Thisisvehiclevsvehicle andvehiclevspedestrian. TheexitfromtheStaterBrothers shoppingcenterontoSantaClarahasalwaysbeena problem. Pleaseitisarecklessanddangerous ideatoimpactthatareawithanotherdoublewidedrivethrough.

Thankyouforconsidering myopinion.

TinaNashick
SentfrommyiPhone
3 City Council 23 – 328 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: yrcasate <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday,
To: eComments, PBA; eComment
Subject: McDonnald Project Item23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Thisemail istoexpress opposition totheproposed McDonald'sinSanta ClaraAve. Thisproject willbea disaster forthiscommunity. Thisisaresidential community inarelatively narrow street withlotsoftraffic during theweek. Allowing thisproject togothrough isunsafe andirresponsible. Regardless ofwhat studies andreports maysay, common sense tellsyouthatthisisnotbetterforthiscommunity.

Itishardtoimagine thatthere isaconstituency advocating forthisproject when there areother McDonald'sin thearea. Sowhat'sdriving it? Money? Greed?
Ifso, your choice isclear, public safety andwellbeing versus corporate greed.

During elections youtellushowmuch better youwillmake ourcity. Nowthatyou've hadourvote, itistime foraction, notjustcampaign slogans andsigns. Sodowhat youwereelected todo, which isrepresent the residents ofyour community, EVEN ifitgoesagainst yourpersonal preferences orbenefits.

Make theright choice andreject thisproject.

Itisyourdutyasapublic servant!
Yuri
SentfrommyT-Mobile5GDevice
4 City Council 23 – 329 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: FranNeedham <portolaparkho@gmail. com>
Sent: Sunday, March
To: eComment
Cc: Winston Covington; JesseLopez@santa- ana.org
Subject: McDonalds-SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

WeareintheTustinSchool District. Allschools areeastofthe55Freeway. Numerous children ridetheir bicycles toschool. Theyattend Elementary, JrHighandSrHighSchools. Returning home fromschool they ridealong thecurbinfrontofthisproperty (2101/2109ESanta Clara). Thisproperty is located adjacent tothe parking lotentrance/exitfortheHorizon Apartments. Also, SantaClara hasalanereduction infrontofthis property.

ThisMcDonalds willgenerate alargeAmount ofSalesTaxforSantaAna. However, isitworth thelifeofa student? Bicycle riders arehardtonotice whilewatching formerging traffic. Also, iftheyridethe 'lowrider' bicycles theyarealmost invisible toadriver.

FranNeedham
KJ6UJS
5 City Council 23 – 330 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Patricia Sornborger <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 31,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald Project Item #23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

PleaseDoNotpassthisproject. Itwouldbedangerous andwreaklesstoconsiderabusinesswithsuchhighvolumecar traffficonastreetthesizeofSantaClarawithapreschool acrossthestreetandthealreadyverybusyStaterBrosMarket trafficinthatlocation.

IwalkthatareaeverydayandseehowdifficultitisforthatsectionofSantaClaratodealwiththetrafficitalreadyhas.

ThankYou,
PatriciaSornborger
SantaAna, Ca92705
iPhone
6 City Council 23 – 331 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: KarenAlvarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March
To: eComment; Lopez, Jessie
Subject: McDonalds Project - Item # 23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hello,
IliveinthePortola Parkneighborhood rightbywhere theproposed McDonald'swouldbelocated. Santa Clara isapretty busy street withonlytwolanes sobuilding aMcDonalds therewould cause unnecessary congestion fortheneighborhood. There'salsoalready aMcDonalds onlyafewblocks awayon17thandLincoln Avenue.

Thenew McDonalds wouldonlybea4minute drive away from theonethat'salready there. Itreally doesn't make sense toputsomething inplace therethatwillprovide absolutely nobenefit totheneighboring community. Please donotletthisMcDonalds project pass. Thank youforyourtime.

KindRegards,
KarenAlvarez
7 City Council 23 – 332 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: mr <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sProject-Item #23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

Goodevening towhomItmayconcern,
PleasestoptheMcDonald’sprojectthisisNOTgoodforourneighborhood orcommunity.

Weopposethisproject.

MyrnaAyala
8 City Council 23 – 333 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Rodney Estle <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: eComment
Subject: Fw: McDonalds Project Item # 23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Forwarded Message -----
From: Rodney Estle <
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: MayorProTemJessie Lopez <jessielopez@santa- ana.org>; Councilmember Jessie Lopez jessielopez@cityofsantaana. ccsend.com>
Sent: Monday, April1, 2024at09:47:39AMPDT
Subject: McDonalds Project Item # 23
IopposeTheMcDonalds ProjectonSantaClaraduetothelargevolume ofvehicles entering andexitingthissingle laneeach way. Thisisjustabadideafromthestartasitwillcreate averydangerous situation withadouble lanedrivethrough exiting ontoan already busy congested single laneeachwaystreet. Wealready havealotoftrafficatthislocation andtheextra traffic created by McDonalds willcreate adangerous situation duetovehicles tryingtoexitontoSantaClaraandobviously making leftturns togetto TustinAve. Theconsequences ofthisactionwillputundohardship onouradjoining neighborhoods andcause vehicles tocut through ourneighborhoods speeding downourstreets, andmaking illegalu-turns togetback toTustinAve. Common sense tellsus thislocation isnotdesigned foralargerestaurant ofanykind, letalone adouble drive through thatwillexitontoour1lane eachway street creating dangerous driving situations onadailybasis. Safety should beofutmost concern. Another problem isitwillattract moreHomeless tohangoutattheMcDonalds andaround ourneighborhoods. Thiswillbedetrimental tooursafety andquality of life. Please consider alocation thatdoesnothavevehicles entering andexiting ontoouralready crowded streets andneighborhoods andcause dangerous situations onadailybasis. Wealready haveaMcDonalds lessthan2milesfromhere. Iamnotopposed to McDonalds, justthatthislocation isapoorchoice andwillcause anegative impact onourSafety andCongested Traffic atthis location. Please reconsider abetterlocation thatwould notnegatively impact usforallofourSafety.

ThankYou
Rodney Estle
9 City Council 23 – 334 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:00AM
To: eComment
Subject: Letter #1ofSupport attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 10 City Council 23 – 335 4/2/2024
1 City Council 23 – 336 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:01AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #2attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 12 City Council 23 – 337 4/2/2024
3 City Council 23 – 338 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:02AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #3attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 14 City Council 23 – 339 4/2/2024
5 City Council 23 – 340 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:02AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #4attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 16 City Council 23 – 341 4/2/2024
7 City Council 23 – 342 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:03AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #5attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 18 City Council 23 – 343 4/2/2024
9 City Council 23 – 344 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:04AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #6attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 20 City Council 23 – 345 4/2/2024
1 City Council 23 – 346 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:04AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #7attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 22 City Council 23 – 347 4/2/2024
3 City Council 23 – 348 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:05AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #8attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 24 City Council 23 – 349 4/2/2024
5 City Council 23 – 350 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:05AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #9attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 26 City Council 23 – 351 4/2/2024
7 City Council 23 – 352 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:06AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #10attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 28 City Council 23 – 353 4/2/2024
9 City Council 23 – 354 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:07AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #10attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 30 City Council 23 – 355 4/2/2024
1 City Council 23 – 356 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:07AM
To: eComment
Subject: Re: LetterofSupport #10attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Thissupport letter number 11..correction.

AMFamilies forProgress < familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> wrote:
32 City Council 23 – 357 4/2/2024
3 City Council 23 – 358 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:08AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #12attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 34 City Council 23 – 359 4/2/2024
5 City Council 23 – 360 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:08AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #13attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 36 City Council 23 – 361 4/2/2024
7 City Council 23 – 362 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:09AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #14attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 38 City Council 23 – 363 4/2/2024
9 City Council 23 – 364 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:09AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #15attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 40 City Council 23 – 365 4/2/2024
1 City Council 23 – 366 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:10AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #16attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 42 City Council 23 – 367 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 368 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:11AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #17attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 44 City Council 23 – 369 4/2/2024
5 City Council 23 – 370 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:11AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #18attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 46 City Council 23 – 371 4/2/2024
7 City Council 23 – 372 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:12AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #19attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 48 City Council 23 – 373 4/2/2024
9 City Council 23 – 374 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:12AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #20attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 50 City Council 23 – 375 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 376 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:13AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #21attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 52 City Council 23 – 377 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 378 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:13AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #22attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 54 City Council 23 – 379 4/2/2024
5 City Council 23 – 380 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:14AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #23attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 56 City Council 23 – 381 4/2/2024
7 City Council 23 – 382 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:14AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #24attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 58 City Council 23 – 383 4/2/2024
9 City Council 23 – 384 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:15AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #25attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 60 City Council 23 – 385 4/2/2024
1 City Council 23 – 386 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:15AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #25attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 62 City Council 23 – 387 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 388 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:16AM
To: eComment
Subject: Re: LetterofSupport #25attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. correction --- thisisletter #26
AMFamilies forProgress < familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> wrote:
64 City Council 23 – 389 4/2/2024
City Council 23 – 390 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:16AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #27attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 66 City Council 23 – 391 4/2/2024
7 City Council 23 – 392 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:17AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #28attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 68 City Council 23 – 393 4/2/2024
9 City Council 23 – 394 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:18AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #29attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 70 City Council 23 – 395 4/2/2024
1 City Council 23 – 396 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:18AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #30attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 72 City Council 23 – 397 4/2/2024
3 City Council 23 – 398 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:19AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #31attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 74 City Council 23 – 399 4/2/2024
5 City Council 23 – 400 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:19AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #32attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 76 City Council 23 – 401 4/2/2024
7 City Council 23 – 402 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Families forProgress <familiesforprogresssa@gmail. com> Sent: Monday, April1, 202411:20AM
To: eComment
Subject: LetterofSupport #33attached – McDonalds Project 2109EastSantaClaraAvenue Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. 78 City Council 23 – 403 4/2/2024
9 City Council 23 – 404 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: ROGER SHORTALL < rogershortall@sbcglobal. net>
Sent: Monday, April1, 2024
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald’sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachments orlinks.

IamTOTALLYAGAINST havingaMcDonald’sonthislocation; 1). Trafficishorriblealready; 2). ThereisaPreschool acrossthestreetwhichisdangerous fortheparentsdoingdropoff & pickup. 3). Iunderstand therewillbearighthandturn intoMcDonald’swhichwillcausepeopletocomethroughour neighborhood offofRidgewood ontoCatalina andaroundtomaketheirrighthandturn.

Listentothepeople & don’tgoforwardwiththisProjectorwewillworktogetyoualloutofoffice.

RogerShortall
SentfrommyiPhone
80 City Council 23 – 405 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: Joseph Monge <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds Project - Item # 23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hello,
Iwanttoaddmyname forapproval ofaMcDonalds nearthecorner ofTustin andSanta Clara intheCityof SantaAna. IliveinMeredith Parkwood. Itwould beawelcome foodaddition tothearea. Idon'tseethatit would bedetrimental toourarea.

Thank you,
Joseph Monge
81 City Council 23 – 406 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: JohnPizanie <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: eComment
Subject: publichearplanning andbuilding project 2101 &2109 Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks. ihaveliveacross thestreet from stater brother centerforalmost 30years ihaveliveinsanta anaforalmost 60years thiscityisourhome iseecityallows street vender at4location attustin andsanta clara ??? thismcdonalds willhelpwithgetting ridofstreet vender andsendmore mone tocityintheformofsaletax alsothiswilltieinabeter shopping experience formeandmyfemale andalsowiden entrance tocenter helping traffic flowialsoworninthecity , liveinthecityandshopinthiscityabetter smarter retailwillalsoraise property values andhaveandclean andmore beautiful andlesstraffic inourareap.s. wemeandmylarge family dofrequent thiscenter aswearelooking forward tothisMcDonal'shereinthislocation anditasmart move forcitytoapprove ofthis , lesstraffic bettery entrance andexitofcenter andmoretaxes forcittywinwin JohnPizanie
Service Manager
QualityService ThatGivesPeaceofMind."
TheAutoService
800S. GrandAve.

SantaAna, CA92705
Phone:

Email:
82 City Council 23 – 407 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: CeciliaSo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds @TustinAve. andSanta Clara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hello,
Iwould liketovoicemysupport ofthisproject. Ibelieve thatitwould addeconomic value totheareain creating more jobopportunities. Thearchitecture oftheproposed project seems tohavebeencarefully throughout andwould make theplaza morecohesive. Also, theproposed project wouldimprove siteaccess to theplaza byremoving 2driveways onSantaClara.

Best,
Cece
83 City Council 23 – 408 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: CDavis <
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds development atStaterBros. onSantaClara Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

IwouldliketheMcDonaldsdevelopmentasIbelieveitmakeimprovements tothearea. MyparentsboughtahouseonN.

WrightSt. inthe70'ssoIfeelasthoughIwouldbeabetterrepresentative totheareathanthosethathavejustmoved intotheneighborhood. Inmy50yearsoflivingandworkingwithin5squaremilesofTustinandSantaClaraIhavenot seenalotofimprovements tothatparticularcorner. Theemptylotnexttothepreschoolhasbeenaneyesoreforatleast 20yearsandnowwehavetheemptypropertybytheCHPwherethehomelessarehangingoutanddoingdrugs, howdo iknowthatwellI'vewitnessedit. PeopledonotseemtocareaboutthissideofSantaAnawejusthaveneighborsthat complainaboutpossiblebusinessesgoinginwithoutofferinganyothersolutionsthatwouldactuallyhelpthecommunity. I liketheideaofaddingjobopportunitiesandanicerlooktothatshoppingcenter. Ialsorealizetheremightbemoretraffic tothearebutwouldn'tthatalsobringmorebusinesstothemomandpopshopsinthatcenter? Ihavenoticedadecrease infoottrafficthatcenterandtheshopsacrossthestreet.
inclosingIwouldalsoliketosaypropertyvaluesinthesurroundingneighborhoods havealwaysbeensubstantialandI wouldmuchratherseeanestablishedchainrestaurantthathasthefinancialabilitytokeeptheirpropertyniceandclean insteadofpeoplethatarejustouttomakeafewbucksandmoveon.

Thankyou,
CarrieDavis
1 City Council 23 – 409 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: AT&T-YahooSer. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April1,
To: eComment
Subject: McDonalds Project atTustinAve/SantaClara - item#23 Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

DearSantaAnaCouncilMembers,
AsaresidentofWard3, intheMeredithTerracesection, forover40plusyears. Wehavegraveconcernsaboutthe proposedMcDonaldsprojectatTustinAve & SantaClara. Ourmainconcernistrafficsafetythatsuchaprojectwillbring.

SantaClarahasjustonelaneEast & onelaneWest, fromTustinAvetoGrandAve. Theproposeddoublewidedrive throughlaneswouldheavilyimpacttrafficonSantaClaraandsafetyinthearea. HeadingEastoutoftheMcDonalds wouldbenexttoimpossible, therebydirectingmosttrafficWest. LikelysomecustomerswillwanttoheadEastandwillbe makingU-turnsinthelocalneighborhoods, againcausingadditionaltrafficsafetyconcerns.

ItisstronglysuggestedthattheCouncilMembersvotenoonthisprojectinviewoftheimportantmajorsafetyandtraffic issuesonthelocalneighborhoods. LikethePreschool, largeCondominium complex, largeApartmentcomplexesaswell assinglefamilyhomes.

Regards,
Bruce & KarenHansen
2 City Council 23 – 410 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: elizabeth marr <mae85002000@yahoo. com>
Sent: Monday, April
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sitem #23
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Hello,
Thisistobeacknowledged asavoteagainst theproposed McDonald'sonSanta Clara.

Iamaresident ofthisarea, thedriveways andtraffic intheareaarealready amess. Please donotincrease the traffic andriskaccidents/road blockages.

Thank you.

Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
1 City Council 23 – 411 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: JeffCessna <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: eComment
Subject: McDonald'sProject atTustin/SantaClara
Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Iama32yearresident ofSantaAnalivingneartheproposed project andamhere todetailwhythisproject should never be approved. Iwanttopointoutthatlamnotacrazed NIMBY fighting every project. Inreality lamaretiredSCEsenior electrical distribution planner andhaveattended many quarterly jointutility meetings hereinthepastandhavedesigned andmanaged the electrical distribution formany commercial projects inSantaAnaandthroughout NorthOrange County.

Listed belowarethereasons, explanations andjustifications against thisproject:
1) There isnowaytomitigate thetraffic congestion andpublic safety problems created bythisproject. Compare thisproposal with theprojectontheN/EcornerofTustinand17th (lnandOutandChickfilA). ldidtheinitial electrical design forthatproject andit wasproperly designed tomitigate allthetraffic andsafety problems itcreated. Itisacornerlotandwaszoned forcommercial use. Property wastaken asacondition ofdevelopment (Iassume) andused forabusstopandturnlaneintotheproperty tomitigate thecongestion andpublic safety issues created bytheproject. Ithasworked asdesigned andifanything, northbound traffic flowon Tustin hasimproved. Alsothisproject was initially designed forthreebusinesses. hence thevacant landontheNorth endofthe development. Whynotdevelop thatspace withnozoning change, safety andtraffic congestion issues already addressed, andno impact tothelocalresidents incomplete contrast withtheproposed McDonalds project. 2) Recently completed street improvements toSanta Clarahavesignificantly improved thesafetyoftheTustin/SantaClara intersection. Overtheyearsmywifeandl haveseen numerous accidents andnearmisses attheTustin/SantaClaraintersection. My wifeandIwereT-boned therein2017andourcarwastotaled. Theproposed McDonald’sProject doesnotallowfornecessary street improvements tomitigate theincreased traffic andcongestion problems andwillmorethanundo theimprovements recently completed. ItWILLcause morecongestion, frustration, accidents andserious injuries.

Inconclusion: Padding themonetary bottom lineoftheTexas realestate company pushing thisproject andincreasing citysales tax revenue arenotvalidreasons tochange zoning restrictions andpermit aproject thatwillnegatively impact localresidents, businesses, including Plumfield Preschool, directly across thestreet, andwillcause congestion, traffic, bike, andpedestrian accidents, injuries, andpossibly deaths.

Thank you, JeffCessna
2 City Council 23 – 412 4/2/2024
Flores, Dora
From: DaleHelvig <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April
To: eComment; Hall, Jennifer; Amezcua, Valerie; Phan, Thai; Vazquez, Benjamin; Lopez, Jessie; Bacerra, Phil; Hernandez, Johnathan; Penaloza, David Cc: Hatch, Tom; Mendoza, Steven; Carvalho, SoniaR.

Subject: 2024-04-01LettertoCityCouncil-Item23 -ZoneChange Attachments: 2024-04-01LettertoCityCouncil-Item23 -ZoneChange.pdf Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecaution whenopening attachments orlinks.

Seeattached filefor2024-04-02CityCouncil meeting.

DaleHelvig
Resident, SantaAna
1 City Council 23 – 413 4/2/2024