Exhibit 2 — Santa Ana City Council, May 5, 2026 (part 7 of 8)

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT S-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Summary of Findings
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at‐grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation, including depressing the profile of Santa Ana Boulevard under the adjacent Metrolink tracks to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project. The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities. The Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) Attachment 1, Figures 1 & 2, contains the Project Location and Project Vicinity Maps.

As part of this Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER), historic archaeological and built environment resources were identified and evaluated for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), as required by 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 800 and the regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (Section 106). The assessment also conforms to the Section 106 Programmatic Agreement (PA) executed January 1, 2004.

Architectural field surveys of the project’s proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE) were conducted in August 2011, according to standard Department guidelines and procedures. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad was previously determined ineligible for the National Register, as was 1111 East Fruit Street. 917 Logan Street was surveyed in 1980 and was determined to be a 5D2, a contributor to a district that is eligible for local listing or designation. The Orange County Maintenance Yard at 1102 E.

Fruit Street was previously determined eligible for the National Register in a letter from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) dated December 27, 2004; however, after EXHIBIT 2
Summary of Findings
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT S- 2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
the property was surveyed and re‐assessed, it has been concluded that the evaluation in 2004 was in error and the Orange County Road Department Maintenance Yard does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register or the California Register. Based on the field survey and further evaluation of the property by Stephen D. Mikesell of ICF International, that finding has been changed and 1102 E. Fruit Street has been determined ineligible for the National Register and California Register. Thirty additional properties were evaluated for this HRER. Stephen D. Mikesell, Jessica B. Feldman and Elizabeth Hilton of ICF International, who meet the Professionally Qualified Staff standards in Section 106 PA Attachment 1 as Principal Architectural Historians, have determined that none of the evaluated properties appear eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register.

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT TOC-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Table of Contents
Summary of Findings........................................................................................................ S‐1 Chapter 1 Project Description....................................................................................... 1‐1

1.1 Scope of Proposed Project ............................................................................................ 1‐1

1.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................ 1‐1

1.3 Area of Potential Effects................................................................................................ 1‐2 Chapter 2 Research Methods........................................................................................ 2‐1

2.1 Sources of Information.................................................................................................. 2‐1

2.2 Themes to Establish Historic Context............................................................................ 2‐2

2.3 Public Participation and Consultation ........................................................................... 2‐2 Chapter 3 Field Methods .............................................................................................. 3‐1

3.1 Historic Architecture...................................................................................................... 3‐1

3.2 Archaeology.................................................................................................................... 3‐1 Chapter 4 Historical Overview....................................................................................... 4‐1

4.1 Local Historical Setting .................................................................................................. 4‐1

4.1.1 Orange County ................................................................................................... 4‐1

4.1.2 Santa Ana............................................................................................................ 4‐5

4.2 Transportation History ................................................................................................ 4‐10

4.2.1 Burlington Santa Fe Railroad ........................................................................... 4‐11

4.3 Architectural Development.............................................................................. 4‐11

4.3.1 Industrial Architecture ..................................................................................... 4‐11

4.3.2 Residential Architecture................................................................................... 4‐11 Chapter 5 Description of Cultural Resources................................................................ 5‐1 Chapter 6 Findings and Conclusions.............................................................................. 6‐1

6.1 Findings.......................................................................................................................... 6‐1

6.2 Conclusions.................................................................................................................... 6‐5 Chapter 7 Bibliography ................................................................................................. 7‐1 Chapter 8 Preparers’ Qualifications.............................................................................. 8‐1 Appendices
Appendix A ‐ Department of Parks and Recreation Forms: DPR 523 EXHIBIT 2
Table of Contents
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT TOC- 2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
List of Abbreviated Terms
APE Area of Potential Effects
ASR Archaeological Survey Report
California Register California Register of Historical Resources Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Department California Department of Transportation
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
HOV high‐occupancy vehicle
HPSR Historic Property Survey Report
HRER Historical Resources Evaluation Report
National Register National Register of Historic Places
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
PA Programmatic Agreement
PQS Professionally Qualified Staff
ROW right‐of‐way
SCCIC South Central Coastal Archaeological Information Center TCE temporary construction easements
EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 1-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 1 Project Description

1.1 Scope of Proposed Project
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at‐grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County (County), California. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project. The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities.

1.2 Project Description
Currently, 66 trains cross Santa Ana Boulevard at this location on weekdays. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard.

The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I‐5) southbound off‐ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes: minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul‐de‐sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 1. Project Description
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 1- 2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project.

The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities. During construction the project proposes to construct a temporary two track shoofly railroad alignment for the purpose of constructing the underpass structure while maintaining railroad service, which is to be constructed beginning just south of the existing Metrolink crossing of I‐5 and terminating south of the Santa Ana Transportation Center near 4th Street. This shoofly alignment would be located east of the existing railroad alignment. The project also proposes to construct a two‐lane detour road south of Santa Ana Boulevard, which would be used by traffic during the construction of the underpass bridge and its approaches. The project also proposes to use Fruit Street as a detour route during the final phase of construction. New right‐of‐way, including both permanent acquisitions and temporary easements, would be needed for the construction of the shoofly and detour road.

Construction staging areas for the proposed project would potentially be located on the following properties: APNs 398‐093‐13, 398‐092‐12, and 398‐207‐01. The disposal site for the proposed project, if needed, would be selected by the contractor. Any environmental clearances related to the disposal site will be obtained by the contractor prior to construction.

The proposed project is included in the 2008 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and 2011 cost constrained Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) (federal approval date of December 14, 2010) as project ID ORA082610. The project as proposed is consistent with the 2011 FTIP description.

1.3 Area of Potential Effects
The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project was established in consultation with Charles Baker, Principal Investigator, Senior Environmental Planner (PQS), and Jim Kaufman, Project Manager/Local Assistance Engineer. The APE maps are located in Attachment A in the Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR).

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 1. Project Description
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 1- 3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
The APE was established as the limits of proposed construction, including the limits of the current and proposed right‐of‐way, temporary construction easements plus a sufficient buffer to allow heavy equipment to maneuver, and staging areas. The proposed project does include a limited number of partial and full acquisitions. These acquisitions do not have the potential to affect the setting of a historic property. The height of the vertical APE is the existing grade level. The maximum depth of the vertical APE would be approximately 25 feet for excavation of the underpass structure. Six‐foot diameter cast‐in‐drilled‐hole (CIDH) pile extensions would be used at the bents and driven steel HP piles (HP 14x89) would be used at the abutments. The proposed pile lengths are anticipated to be 55 feet and 70 feet at the bents and the abutments, respectively. The APE maps are located in Attachment A in the HPSR.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 1. Project Description
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 1- 4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 2 Research Methods

2.1 Sources of Information
National, state, and local inventories of historic properties and historical resources were reviewed to determine the location of previously documented historic and architectural resources proximate to the project.

The following standard sources of information were reviewed in the process of compiling this report:
 National Register of Historic Places (http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr);  California Historical Landmarks (State of California, 1996) et seq.;  California Points of Historical Interest (State of California, 1992) et seq.;  California Register of Historical Resources;
 California Historic Resource Inventory System; and
 Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory.

A record search was conducted by the project archaeologists for the proposed project at the South Central Coastal Archaeological Information Center (SCCIC) on July 19, 2011.

The record search included a review of the SCCIC databases for previously identified historical/archaeological resources in or near the APE and existing cultural resources reports pertaining to the vicinity.

Additional resources consulted in the process of compiling this report included the following:
 ProQuest digital archives for the Orange Register;
 TRW/Experian;
 Santa Ana Public Library and Local History Room historic maps, and newspaper clipping vertical files, and Santa Ana city directories;  Los Angeles Public Library History and Genealogy Department Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps and Santa Ana city directories;
EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 2. Research Methods
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
 City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (http://www.ci.santa‐ ana.ca.us/pba/planning/documents/Hist‐register_May05/pdf), and;  Santa Ana Planning Department.

None of the properties located within the APE are listed on federal, state, or local lists of historic resources except for the Orange County Maintenance Yard, which was determined eligible for the National Register by SHPO on December 27, 2004. In addition, 917 Logan Street was surveyed in 1980 and was determined to be a 5D2, a contributor to a district that is eligible for local listing or designation. This determination was provided by a search of the Historic Resources Inventory. However, no information regarding the survey, surveyor or project related to this finding was available. No archaeological resources were identified within the project APE.

2.2 Themes to Establish Historic Context
To establish the historic context, appropriate research was conducted to evaluate the resources within the APE. The research themes included the following:
a. Community Development,
b. Industrial Development in Santa Ana,
c. Local Architecture,
d. Transportation.

2.3 Public Participation and Consultation
On August 29, 2011, letters were sent to government agencies and consulting and interested parties who may have knowledge or concerns about historic properties in the area. In the letters, information was requested regarding historic buildings, districts, sites, objects, and archeological sites of significance within the project area. The letters were sent to the recipients shown on the following page.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 2. Research Methods
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Historical and Cultural Foundation of
Orange County
17200 Jamboree Road, Suite G
Irvine, CA 92714
Orange County Historical Commission
211 W. Santa Ana Boulevard
Santa Ana, CA 91702
Heritage Museum of Orange County
3101 West Harvard Street
Santa Ana, CA 92704
Orange County Historical Society
PO Box 10984
Santa Ana, CA 92711
Heritage Orange County
515 North Main Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Santa Ana Historic Resources Commission
20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex M‐20
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Orange County California Genealogical
Society
Genealogy Collection, Huntington Beach
Central Library
7111 Talbert Ave
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Santa Ana Historical Society
120 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701‐7505
As of September 22, 2011, no letters emails, or phone calls concerning the proposed project have been received from the above listed parties (see Attachment E of the HPSR).

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 2. Research Methods
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 3-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 3 Field Methods

3.1 Historic Architecture
Pursuant to standard Department guidelines and procedures, on August 18, 2011, field surveys of all properties that have been developed with buildings or other structures within the project APE were undertaken by ICF International. Stephen D. Mikesell and Jessica B. Feldman, architectural historians, acted as Principal Co‐Investigators for this project. Elizabeth Hilton, Principal Architectural Historian, completed the fieldwork and conducted the historic research analysis and writing. All persons meet the PA criteria for professionally qualified staff. All parcels were observed from the public right‐of‐way, and digital photographs were taken of all buildings and structures that were visible on each property. The criteria found in Attachment 4 of the Section 106 PA for properties that are exempt from evaluation were applied in the field, with follow‐up in‐office confirmation of construction dates and substantial alterations.

3.2 Archaeology
A records search for the APE and surrounding area was conducted at the SCCIC on July 19, 2011. No archaeological resources have been previously recorded within or adjacent to the APE. On September 11, 2011, a survey was conducted of the project APE. The area was found to be completely developed with commercial and industrial buildings, residential properties, lawn, and paving. No areas of open, undisturbed land were identified. Mark Robinson, Principal Investigator Archaeology, per the standards in Section 106 PA Attachment 1, directed this analysis. (See HPSR, Attachment C: ASR)

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 2. Research Methods
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 2-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 4 Historical Overview

4.1 Local Historical Setting
The proposed project occurs entirely within the City of Santa Ana in Orange County.

Ranching‐ and agricultural‐related occupancy of the land dates from at least the early nineteenth century during the Spanish/Mexican Colonial period. A massive expansion of agricultural homesteading activities occurred during the Anglo‐American settlement in this portion of Northern Orange County during the last three decades of the nineteenth century, culminating in the establishment of the City of Santa Ana in 1869, and the founding, nearby, of the City of Tustin in 1870. As it exists today, development within the project area is comprised of industrial, commercial, institutional, and residential buildings dating from the turn‐of‐the‐twentieth century, early‐twentieth century, and mid‐twentieth century. Rather than reflecting the region’s early nineteenth century ranching history, instead, it reflects the ongoing urbanization and industrialization of the setting associated with the arrival of the Southern Pacific Railroad in 1877, the Santa Fe Railroad in 1888, and the Pacific Electric Interurban railroad in 1904 and the resulting concentration of industrial uses and worker housing in the setting.

4.1.1 Orange County
The period of European colonization of California began during the late 1760s with establishment, under the Spanish Crown, of missions at San Diego in 1769, San Juan Capistrano in 1775, and San Gabriel in 1771. These settlements, and efforts to intern the native people at the missions, and convert them to Christianity, mark the period prior to Mexican independence from Spain in 1821. For administrative purposes, the Spanish missionaries divided the native people into two groups named for the missions responsible for their territories. The Native Americans were of Uto‐Aztecan origin and belonged to the Shoshonean linguistic group. Many of the names the tribes used to describe themselves have been lost to history.1
Those residing south of Aliso Creek
were referred to as the Juaneños (in reference to San Juan Capistrano Mission) while those to the north in present day Santa Ana were referred to as the Gabrieleños (in reference to the San Gabriel Mission). Through new policies during the early 1830s, the

1 Hallan-Gibson, Pamela. 2002. Orange County: The Golden Promise – An Illustrated History. Sun Valley, CA: American Historical Press. p. 24.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Mexican government both secularized the missions and also made a large number of land grants to its citizens in an effort to promote settlement in California and to discourage claims on the territory by the United States and Russia. During the period between 1833 and 1846 approximately 700 land grants were conferred, twenty of which were wholly or partially within the boundaries of Orange County.

The project area occurs within the boundaries of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. In 1810, this land grant was made under Spanish rule to Bernardo Yorba when his father‐ in‐law Juan Pablo Grijalva died prior to the grant being approved. Members of the Yorba family reconfirmed title to the 63,414‐acre property in 1839.2 Although the Yorba family claim to its ranch was upheld again by the U.S. Land Commission (1855), the number and conflicting nature of claims by heirs as well as other non‐family claimants led to the partition of the rancho in 1866.3
Among the non‐family claimants was Jacob
Ross, Sr. Three years later, Ross sold 74 acres of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana to Kentuckian William D. Spurgeon, who then founded the City of Santa Ana.

California counties were delineated in 1850. The 500 residents located in the Santa Ana Valley, of what is now known as Orange County, were included at the time within the boundaries of Los Angeles County. But as the population and wealth of the Santa Ana Valley began to grow so too did the sentiment for the formation of a separate, distinct county. A trip to the Los Angeles County seat took many hours over uncertain dirt roads and there was a growing resentment that the taxes being sent to Los Angeles were not being returned in a fair share of public works.

In 1870, Maximilian Strobel, a resident of the town of Anaheim, introduced to the State legislature a proposal for all the territory south of the San Gabriel River to separate from Los Angeles and become Anaheim County. The proposal was approved by the Assembly but was not ratified in the Senate. Although this initial effort was unsuccessful, half a dozen subsequent attempts were made to organize a coalition for separation, suggesting the names of Santa Ana, Anaheim and Orange for the new county. These proposals met with opposition in Sacramento, primarily from Los Angeles, which did not want to lose a part of its tax base. In the next round of proposals for county formation, the northern boundary was changed from the San Gabriel River to Coyote Creek, and in 1889, the proposal was approved for the creation of Orange County. In the same year,

2 Ibid. p. 34.
3 Cleland, Robert Glass. 1962. The Irvine Ranch. San Marino: Huntington Library. Pp. 32-33.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
the City of Santa Ana was selected by vote as the Orange County seat.4 William Spurgeon, the founder of the City of Santa Ana, became a member of the newly established County board of supervisors and was elected as board chairman.5 “Orange County is a most inviting field for the home‐seeker, where the fig and vine, the luscious orange and acidulous lemon, the rich olive, the meaty walnut and peanut, the pomegranate and guava, apples, quinces, peaches, pears, plums, nectarines and prunes, blackberries, strawberries, raspberries, grains and vegetables thrive, make abundant return, and amply reward the husbandman for his time and labor.”6 This statement appeared in a booklet published in 1897 by the Orange County Herald. The County was proud of its 227,000 orange trees, 95,000 apricot trees, 165,000 other fruit trees, 140,000 nut trees, and between 3,000 and 5,000 beehives. Unfortunately, in 1888, blight resulted in the death of approximately two million grapevines in Anaheim, and another 300,000 perished in Orange, Westminster, Garden Grove and Santa Ana.

Commercial grape cultivation never recovered, and near the end of the century, less than 500 acres in the County were still producing grapes.

After the blight of the grape vines, “farmers also planted plums, prunes, peaches, pears and walnuts. While they waited for these trees to bear, they added quick row crops between them – corn, beans, potatoes, tomatoes. Celery had been a popular crop in Santa Ana during the 1890s until blight decimated the plants and caused growers to look for other suitable and profitable crops to grow. This led farmers in Santa Ana and the Irvine Ranch to cultivate lima beans, sugar beets, and barley. The production of barley led them from wine to malt liquor making, and breweries flourished for a while.

Sugar beet production formed the basis for granulated sugar industry—a major portion of the agricultural revenue in Orange County for many years (e.g., the Holly Sugar Company, Santa Ana). Surprisingly, enough tobacco was also grown in the late 1880s to support several cigar factories.”7

4 Gass, Mary. 1988.“The Formation of Orange County.” In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. Esther R. Cramer, Keith A Dixon, Diann Marsh, Phil Brigandi and Clarice Blamer, editors. Santa Ana: Orange County Centennial, Inc. pp 36-37. 5 Goddard.
6 Walker, Doris. 1989. Orange County, a Centennial Celebration: Sections of Orange. Houston: Pioneer Publications.
7 Ibid.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Orange County also produced chili peppers in Anaheim and avocados in Yorba Linda.

Walnuts also proved to be very profitable for the County. “Walnuts were grown in several areas of the County but were particularly successful in the San Juan Capistrano, La Habra, and Placentia areas where the water table was high and the soils were deep.”8

During the 1920s through the 1960s the County was producing a large portion of the world’s crop of soft‐shelled walnuts.

The mild southern California weather made Orange County an ideal place to produce oranges. Valencia oranges, first introduced by Richard Gilman of Placentia, California in 1872 from experiments while he was working at the Southern California Semi‐Tropical Fruit Company, allowed Orange County to live up to its name. In 1875, the first commercial grove of Valencia oranges in Southern California were planted in Fullerton.

Orange County became an official county in 1889; the namesake was derived from the numerous orchards that occupied the area. Many of the fields that once produced wine grapes were now producing Valencia oranges. Orange boosters promoted “Anaheim, Home of the Finest Sunkist Valencia Oranges.” By 1915, the chamber of commerce was calling Anaheim the “Capital of the Valencia Orange Empire.”9 Beginning in 1921, the California Valencia Orange Show opened in Anaheim and continued for ten years. The Valencia orange became Orange County’s official tree, in 1930, the same year several communities joined forces to hold the Orange County Valencia Show and Fair. “In 1938, the Valencia oranges peak in Orange County, 67,536 acres was planted, with production of over 9.3 million boxes, worth $16.9 million.”10 During the same decade, “Orange County was producing a sixth of the nation’s Valencia orange crop.”11 Oranges covered only 20,000 acres by the 1960s, with less than a dozen packing houses remaining. The Valencia orange continued to be Orange County’s most profitable product until 1966, when the number of orchards was greatly reduced from development.

8 Gass, Mary. 1988. . “The Formation of Orange County.” In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. Esther R. Cramer, Keith A. Dixon, Diann Marsh, Phil Brigandi and Clarice A. Blamer, editors, pp. 36-37. The Orange County Centennial, Inc., Santa Ana, CA 1988.
9 Faessel, Stephen J. 2006. Early Anaheim. Charleston: Arcadia. 10 Ibid. 11 Quoted from the “Wealth from the Soil” portion of “A Brief History of Orange County.” This three-page digest was produced by the County Clerk’s Office and is found online at:
http://www.ocsd.org/vgnfiles/ocgove/Clerk-Recorder/DOC
EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-5

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
In addition to agriculture, the petroleum oil production and processing industry was a major factor in the development of Orange County. The first producing oil well in the County was drilled in Brea in 1882,12 and one of the County’s most famous companies, Union Oil, was formed by Lyman Stewart and Wallace Hardison, who had been active with the Brea oil strike.13 However, the success of early oil production efforts in the Brea and La Habra (1885) area was to be overshadowed by the major strikes at Placentia in 1919 (Chapman #1) and at Huntington Beach in 1920.14 By the 1960s, long after urban development had supplanted nearly all agricultural acreage in the County, oil production remained a prominent visual feature on the landscape.

4.1.2 Santa Ana
With the founding by William H. Spurgeon of the City of Santa Ana in 1869, and his laying out of a 24‐block village, the urban history of Santa Ana began. The community, however, would remain primarily agrarian in character for the next several decades of its history, notwithstanding several significant local historical events that factored prominently in the development history of the community. These include the arrival of the Southern Pacific Railroad in Santa Ana in 1877; the McFadden Brothers’ contemporaneous development of a landing at Newport Beach from which Santa Ana Valley goods could be shipped by sea; the arrival of the Santa Fe Railroad in 1888; the 1889 formation of Orange County out of Los Angeles County that established Santa Ana as the seat of the new county government; and extension of the Pacific Electric Railway to Santa Ana in 1904. Despite these rather momentous developments, Santa Ana had a population of only 8,429 in 1910.

The area Spurgeon chose for the town site was the covered with tall stands of yellow mustard and was bounded on the south by First Street, on the west by Broadway (formerly West Street), on the north by Seventh Street, and on the east by Spurgeon Street.15 Spurgeon operated the town’s general store and its first post office and served as postmaster for the Santa Ana Valley area residents. He induced Wells Fargo into

12 “A Brief History of Orange County.” Loc cit. The oil production efforts by the Puente Oil and La Habra Oil Companies are also discussed by Hallan-Gibson, pp 157-158. 13 Hallan-Gibson, p 160.
14 Ibid. Loc cit.
15 Goddard, Francelia B. and Allen W. 1968. In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. The document has been excerpted and was found online at the following location: www.santaanahistory.com/local_history.html EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-6

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
providing stage coach service to the fledgling community by cutting a three‐mile road to the north where it approached the so‐called “Rodriguez Crossing” of the Santa Ana River.16 Spurgeon seems to have worked tirelessly to promote the success of Santa Ana, spearheading the incorporation movement and efforts to bring railroad service to the community.

In 1877, J.H. Fruit, James McFadden, and Spurgeon organized a company known as the Western Development Company in order to raise the funds needed to encourage the Southern Pacific Railroad to extend its line to Santa Ana from Anaheim.17 The train depot location, just north of Fruit Street, was used as an opportunity to create a new business district and sell land at a larger profit margin than had been the case previously in developing Santa Ana. This subdivision formed the direct basis of the project area.

The depot area encompassed some 160 acres northeast of the original town site. As noted by writer Charles Swanner, it was platted as commercial property with 25‐foot street frontages, “...and its streets were laid out parallel with, or at right angles to, the Southern Pacific track, and tangent with all other streets in town,” thus explaining the neighborhood’s distinctive street patterns.18 The Western Development Company was unsuccessful in its efforts to entice businesses to relocate from the original town site to the depot tract. Consequently, the land was re‐subdivided for residential, and eventually, industrial purposes. Due to its physical separation from the earlier business core and the proximity to the city’s railroad corridors, the subdivision attracted working class families and was one of the few areas in the city where real estate agents would sell property to Mexican Americans.19 By the late nineteenth century, this became the genesis of the Logan Barrio.

Logan Barrio
Most of the properties were owner‐occupied in the Logan Barrio area, which was first settled at the turn of the century. City directories, Sanborn Maps, and US Census records show that in many cases, extended family members shared the residences or

16 Swanner, Charles D. 1953. Santa Ana: A Narrative of Yesterday, 1870-1910. Claremont, CA: Saunders Press, p. 16.
17 Ibid. pp 18-19.
18 Ibid. p 19. The depot location is described by Stephen Gould in his book The Effect of the Railroads on the Development of Santa Ana and Tustin. Yorba Linda: Shumway Family History Series. p 3. 19 Irving, Doug. “Still Fighting for ‘Sacred Ground’ of Logan Barrio.” The Orange County Register, January 19, 2008.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-7

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
built small auxiliary dwellings on individual parcels. The 1920 US Census records for Lincoln Avenue and Logan Street show that most men living in the neighborhood worked as general laborers. Residents of this area also may have been employed by the warehouses to the south, as fruit packers, or as pickers in the many citrus farms in the immediate area.

Lincoln Avenue, located within the project area, was the eastern boundary of the Logan Barrio. The north boundary may have been E. Washington Street. When the Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana were published in 1906, the south end of Lincoln ended at Depot Street, just a few blocks from the Santa Fe and Southern Pacific depots. “C” Street, later Santiago Street, and the lumber yards and mills of J.M. Griffith Company provided the western boundary of the Logan Barrio. This was primarily a residential neighborhood until the 1950s, with no pattern of development associated with specific persons or events being evident. In the 1950s, many single‐family homes were demolished, and parcels, especially along Lincoln Avenue, were merged into large lots occupied by small businesses and industrial facilities.

In the post‐World War II era, most of the undeveloped parcels of the Logan Barrio were occupied. Santa Ana Sanborn Mapsheet 20, prepared in 1949, notes that “all occupancies in these two blocks are Mexican,” referring to Logan Street and Lincoln Avenue between Fruit (formerly Depot) to the south and E. Washington Street to the north. Many parcels contained more than one dwelling. On the north side of Stafford, between Logan Street and Lincoln Avenue, was the Logan School, a segregated public school that served the barrio. Several businesses were located at the intersection of Stafford and Logan Streets, including stores and a bakery. Today, most properties along Lincoln Avenue are industrial; although, some residential properties still remain. Logan Street remains primarily residential, although many of the original dwellings from the 1920s have been demolished and replaced with contemporary single‐family homes.

City Development
The incorporation of the City of Santa Ana was likely related to lobbying efforts on behalf of establishing a separate county jurisdiction in which Santa Ana would serve as the county seat, and efforts to encourage the Santa Fe Railroad to establish a depot in EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-8

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Santa Ana (1887‐1888). When the City of Santa Ana incorporated in June 1886, it boasted a population of 2,000. Spurgeon became its first mayor.20 The 1910s and early 1920s period was one of major new development in and bordering Santa Ana. In 1912, the voters approved a $1.2 million road improvements bond that led to the paving and improvement of key “inter‐city roads” in Orange County. Three years later more than 108 miles of road work had been completed.21 By the end of the decade, and continuing into the 1920s, aggressive promotional efforts on the part of the County Board of Supervisors and the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce brought new businesses and a flood of new homeowners into the area.22 At the opening of the 1940s, and with a small population of only 32,000, Santa Ana continued to be chiefly an agricultural community, serving also as a regional government and business center. As the primary storage and distribution point for Orange County agricultural and dairy products, it was the locus, almost exclusively, for small‐scale food processing and furniture manufacturing businesses of local and regional scope. Due to local planning policies that discouraged the development of typical smokestack industry, the largest manufacturing facility in Santa Ana was the Holly Sugar Company’s Dyer Station Plant, which processed sugar beets into granulated sugar.

Dating from 1912, it stood on the north side of Dyer Road between Halladay and Grand Streets well south of the Santa Ana municipal boundaries.

Until the 1940s, local planning and economic policy was not focused on promoting new industrial development in Santa Ana. Local land use policies regarding industrialization shifted during the late 1940s, in all likelihood due to the emergence of technology‐ based industry opportunities during World War II and related lobbying efforts by local business and business‐friendly stakeholders in the community.23 The mobilization for World War II ushered in these and other dramatic changes to Orange County. Santa Ana went so far as to send a lobbyist to Washington to try to interest the government in developing a military base in the area. Groundbreaking on October 23, 1941 for the

20 Goddard. Loc cit.
21 Ibid. p 201.
22 Ibid. p 191.
23 Braitsch, Fred G. “Young Industrial Giant Booming in Santa Ana.” n.d. from The [Santa Ana Daily] Register. On file: Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-9

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
West Coast Army Air Corps Training Command headquarters shows that such efforts were successful. The Air Corps property, located where Orange Coast College is today, “brought growth, jobs, and economic revitalization” to a community still struggling to recover from the Great Depression.24 The opening of the Santa Ana Air Station (1942) and U.S. Marine Corps Air Station at El Toro (1942) served to further bolster military‐ related job and business opportunities in the Santa Ana area.

Informally established in 1953 (officially organized February 1955), the Industrial Development Division of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce took its mission quite seriously of attracting new industry to Santa Ana, and of lobbying local government for infrastructure report for such development. It was described in The [Orange County] Register as having been “…the leading force in bringing industry into Santa Ana.”25 By 1968, the Industrial Development Division was credited with having created 15,740 new jobs in Santa Ana and with having increased manufacturing payroll by 1,043 percent between 1953 and1968.26 In the early 1940s, most Santa Ana area industrial workers had been commuters to Los Angeles and Long Beach; however, by the 1960s many workers found employment in Orange County, due chiefly to the dramatic expansion of technology‐based manufacturing that the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce and other boosters helped usher in. Historian Pamela Hallan‐Gibson writes that “…a human tsunami swept over Santa Ana and Orange County in the 1950s, taking much of the old culture with it.” This was most notably reflected in the transformation of the landscape “as farmland gave way to urban development.”27 The population figures starkly convey this change. In 1940, there were 130,760 inhabitants in the County. By 1960, the Orange County population had grown to approximately 704,000.28

24 Hallan-Gibson, p 219.
25 Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce, Industrial Development Division. “Santa Ana: The City of Opportunity.” 1969 Centennial Special Edition magazine supplement to The Register, March 12, 1969. On file: Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history.
26 Santa Ana Register. February 1, 1959 “Santa Ana Industry up 26 Per Cent.” n.a. On file: Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history. 27 Hallan-Gibson p. 236
28 Ibid. p. 237.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-10

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION

4.2 Transportation History
There is one railroad segment located within the APE (Map Reference #32). The small section of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe alignment in the project APE crosses 4th Street, Santa Ana Boulevard, and runs parallel to Lincoln Avenue. Two train depots were once located in the project area; the last one standing was demolished to accommodate the larger depot built in 1985 that is sited on the west side of the tracks in the APE.

With the boom provided by the popularity of the navel orange and the establishment of the railroad, Santa Ana’s population rose by the turn of the century. The Atchison Topeka Santa Fe Railroad reached Santa Ana by 1887, when “ten horse cars went to Tustin and two trains to Fairview, while 41 trains or trolleys touched Santa Ana each day.”29 Business took advantage of rail transportation and developed buildings along the rail line, near the depot to provide easy access to the trains. Some of these companies included JM Griffith Company’s Mill and Lumber Yard, which flanked Stafford street along the tracks; Santa Ana Wollen Mills, located at Santiago and Washington Avenues; Westco Company Limited Marble Cutting and Polishing, north of the Woolen Mills; Standard Oil Company of California, sited east of the tracks along Santiago Avenue and north of Stafford; Holly Sugar Corporation, adjacent to the Incline Electric Railroad Trestle; JE Taylor and Company Fruit Cannery south of 4th Street; Smith and Miner Packaging House south of 6th Street and west of the tracks; Gowan and Willards Packaging House south of 6th Street and east of the tracks; CC Collins and Sanborn’s Walnut Houses north of 4th Street; SH Pendleton Lumber and Mill Company west of the tracks and North of 4th Street; and the Southern California Creamery and Ice Company flanked by the Southern Pacific Railroad and the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad at 4th Street. In 1995, Burlington Northern Railroad merged with the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe to form Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF).

In 1906, the Pacific Electric built a Red Car line along Fourth Street in Santa Ana that carried passengers between the city and Los Angeles until the 1950s, when the tracks were removed. In 1953, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) was established between Broadway and First Street.30 It has since extended south of San Diego, at the Mexico – United States border, north through Santa Ana, Los Angeles, Sacramento, and through

29 Goddard. Loc cit.
30 Ibid.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-11

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Oregon and Washington to the International Border with Canada. The freeway was built in several stages until the 1980s, replacing the previously existing US 99.31 Santa Ana Boulevard was constructed in the 1950s, and is the main route of transportation from the train station to the center of town.

4.3 Architectural Development

4.3.1 Industrial Architecture
The architectural forms that predominate within the Santa Ana portion of the APE are solitary or grouped one‐story, tilt‐up concrete buildings of straight‐forward, utilitarian design, with minimal steel industrial sash‐type fenestration. These generally have no architectural design embellishments of any kind, and are typical, commonplace examples of small‐scale industrial development in Southern California dating from the mid‐century. The earliest of these industrial buildings dates from the 1920s, used by the General Petroleum Company and the Orange County Maintenance Yard, which is composed of large rectangular storage buildings with metal siding.

4.3.2 Residential Architecture
The residential sections of the APE were developed beginning the turn of the century and continuing through the 1920s. On the west side of the railroad tracks was the Logan Barrio, occupied by Mexican immigrants, most of whom were day laborers. The architectural styles range from turn‐of‐the‐century National and Craftsman Styles to mid‐century Minimal Traditional dwellings. Several parcels within the project APE have been in filled with newer construction. The same can be said of the neighborhood to the east of the railroad, along Eastwood Avenue. This area was developed in the 1920s, likely as a result of the railroad, and features prominent styles of the time, such as Craftsman and Spanish Colonial Revival residences. The few properties in the APE that border Eastwood Avenue along Fruit Street were in fill construction in the mid‐century, or were relocated to the current site.

31 Interstate 5 in California. AARoads. Accessed August 31, 2011 at: http://www.aaroads.com/california/i005_ca.html EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-12

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 5-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 5 Description of Cultural Resources
The project APE, which is located in the City of Santa Ana, consists overwhelmingly of industrial and residential development. Thirty‐four properties occur within the Santa Ana Grade Separation Project APE that required evaluation. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad was previously determined ineligible for the National Register and the California Register, as was 1111 East Fruit Street. 917 Logan Street was surveyed in 1980 and was determined to be a 5D2, a contributor to a district that is eligible for local listing or designation. This determination was provided by a search of the Historic Resources Inventory. However, no information regarding the survey, surveyor, or project related to this finding was available.

The Orange County Maintenance Yard was previously evaluated and determined eligible for the National Register by SHPO on December 27, 2004; however, the property was re‐ evaluated as a part of this survey. This re‐evaluation was due in part to the availability of new information regarding the historic context of maintenance yard architecture and planning. The buildings located within the APE are composed of single and multi‐family residences, commercial and industrial buildings, and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. These buildings are located in a developed setting with buildings dating from the early‐to‐mid‐century. These resources are discussed in more detail in the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms included in Appendix A.

None of the properties appear to be eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register; a re‐evaluation of the Orange County Maintenance Yard at 1102 East Fruit Street concluded that the evaluation in 2004 was in error and the Orange County Road Department Maintenance Yard does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register or the California Register.

No previously identified archaeological sites are located within the APE.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Historical Overview
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 4-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION

This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 6 Findings and Conclusions

6.1 Findings
The findings listed below are for the 34 properties located within the Santa Ana Grade Project APE.
a. No properties in the APE are listed in the National Register. b. One property in the APE was previously determined eligible for the National Register.

Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 3S 20
c. Two properties in the APE were previously determined not eligible for the National Register.

Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
1111 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 16
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Santa Ana, CA 6Z 34 d. No properties in the APE were determined eligible for the National Register as a result of the current study.
e. A total of thirty‐four properties were determined ineligible for the National Register as a result of the current study.

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
915‐917 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 07
926 Lincoln Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 08
1102‐1112 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 09
1024‐1026 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 10
1022 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 11
1020 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 12
1016 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 13
1012 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 14
1008 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 15
1143 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 17
1207 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 18
1215 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 19
1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 6Z 20
1140 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 21
1170 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 22
742‐744 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 23
741 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 24
742 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 25
1041 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 26
1051 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 27
530 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 28
510 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 29
508 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 30
506 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 31
420 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 32
531 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 33
f. No resources were identified for which further study is required. g. Two properties were identified that had been previously considered historical resources for the purposes of CEQA and were re‐evaluated for the purposes of this study.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 6. Findings and Conclusions
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
917 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z (previously 5D2) 07 1111 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 6Z (previously 3S) 16
Both properties were re‐evaluated during the survey and research phase of this project.

The designation of 917 North Logan Street as a 5D2 occurred more than 20 years ago and did not have supporting documentation. The reassessment of 1111 East Fruit Street occurred after the review of the previous determination identified some errors in that evaluation. Subsequent field survey and research provided new information on the historic context of the property.
h. A total of 34 resources were identified that do not meet the California Register criteria outlined in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1.

Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
1019 East Washington Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 01
1042 Lincoln Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 02
1030 Lincoln Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 03
915‐941 North Santiago Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 04
925 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 05
923 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 06
915‐917 North Logan Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 07
926 Lincoln Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 08
1102‐1112 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 09
1024‐1026 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 10
1022 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 11
1020 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 12
1016 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 13
1012 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 14
1008 Fuller Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 15
1111 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 6Z 16
1143 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 17
EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 6. Findings and Conclusions
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Address/Location Community
OHP Status
Code
Map Reference
No.
1207 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 18
1215 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 19
1102 East Fruit Street, Orange County
Maintenance Yard
Santa Ana, CA 6Z 20
1140 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 21
1170 East Fruit Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 22
742‐744 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 23
741 North Eastwood Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 24
742 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 6Z 25
1041 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 26
1051 East 6th Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 27
530 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 28
510 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 29
508 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 30
506 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 31
420 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 32
531 Terminal Street Santa Ana, CA 6Z 33
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Santa Ana, CA 6Z 34 Stephen D. Mikesell, Jessica B. Feldman, and Elizabeth Hilton of ICF International, who exceeded the Professionally Qualified Staff standards in Section 106 PA Attachment 1 as Principal Architectural Historians, have determined that the other properties present within the APE, including state‐owned resources, meet the criteria for Section 106 PA Attachment 4 (Properties Exempt from Evaluation).

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 6. Findings and Conclusions
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-5

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION

6.2 Conclusions
Thirty‐four built environment properties have been evaluated as part of this HRER. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad was determined ineligible for the National Register and the California Register in 2007, as was 1102 East Fruit Street in 2004. 917 Logan Street was surveyed in 1980 and was determined to be a 5D2. Due to a lack of supporting documentation of that finding and because it was assessed more than 20 years ago, it has been re‐evaluated and determined individually ineligible for the National Register and California Register. The Orange County Maintenance Yard was previously determined eligible for the National Register by SHPO on December 27, 2004.

A re‐assessment of the determination and supporting documentation for 1102 East Fruit Street concluded that the finding in 2004 was in error and the Orange County Road Department Maintenance Yard is ineligible for the National Register and the California Register. All of the evaluated properties have been found to be ineligible for the National Register and the California Register. All other properties within the APE meet the criteria for Section 106 PA Attachment 4 (Properties Exempt from Evaluation).

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 6. Findings and Conclusions
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 6-6

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 7-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 7 Bibliography
AARoads
2011 Interstate 5 in California. Accessed August 31, 2011 at:
http://www.aaroads.com/california/i‐005_ca.html
Ancestry.com
1920 Census Records.

Braitsch, Fred G.
n.d. Young Industrial Giant Booming in Santa Ana. Santa Ana Register. On file:

Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping, vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history.

California Department of Transportation
2000 SR‐55 Background and History. District 12, Orange County. Available:
<http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist12/sr55PAC/55background.htm>.

Cleland, Robert Glass
1962 The Irvine Ranch. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library.

Faessel, Stephen J.
2006 Early Anaheim. Charleston: Arcadia.

Garcia, Maria
2007 Santa Ana’s Logan Barrio: It’s History, Stories, and Family. Santa Ana Historical Preservation Society.

Gass, Mary
1988 The Formation of Orange County. In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. Esther R. Cramer, Keith A. Dixon, Diann Marsh, Phil Brigandi, and Clarice A. Blamer (eds.), pp. 36–37. Santa Ana, CA:

The Orange County Centennial, Inc.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 7. Bibliography
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 7-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Goddard, Francelia B. and Allen W.
1968 In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities.
www.santaanahistory.com/local_history.html
Gould, Stephen
n.d. The Effect of the Railroads on the Development of Santa Ana and Tustin.

Yorba Linda: Shumway Family History Series.

Hallan‐Gibson, Pamela
2002 Orange County: The Golden Promise – An Illustrated History. Sun Valley, CA: American Historical Press.

ICF Jones & Stokes
2008 SR‐91 Westbound Widening Project from State Route 57 to Interstate 5.

Historical Resources Evaluation Report.

Irving, Doug.
2008 “Still Fighting for ‘Sacred Ground’ of Logan Barrio.” The Orange County Register.

Luskey Brothers
1923 Santa Ana, Tustin, Garden Grove and Vicinity City Directory. 1933 Orange County Directory.
1954 Luskey’s Official Santa Ana, Orange, Tustin, and Central Orange County Criss Cross Directory.
1962 Luskey’s Santa Ana, Tustin, and Lemon Heights Criss Cross City Directory and Classified Yellow Book.

ProQuest
1920 Detroit, Mich.: Proquest Information and Learning, 2003‐[site continually updated]. Original material from: Fourteenth Census of the United States, 1920. (NARA microfilm publication T625, 2076 rolls). Records of the Bureau of the Census, Record Group 29. National Archives, Washington, D.C.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 7. Bibliography
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 7-3

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
McAlester, Virginia and Lee
2000 A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, p. 63.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Company
1906 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Map of Santa Ana, California.

Los Angeles Public Library online database resources.
1949 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Map of Santa Ana, California.

Los Angeles Public Library online database resources.

Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce
n.d. Map collection, Santa Ana Public Library and History Room. Chiefly 1965 and 1970 city maps of Santa Ana, California.

Santa Ana Register
1959 Santa Ana Industry Up 26 Per Cent. February 1. On file: Santa Ana Public Library and History Room, newspaper clipping, vertical files on Santa Ana industrial history.

Swanner, Charles D.
1953 Santa Ana: A Narrative of Yesterday, 1870‐1910. Claremont, CA: Saunders Press
Walker, Doris
1989 Orange County, a Centennial Celebration: Sections of Orange. Houston:

Pioneer Publications.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 7. Bibliography
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 7-4

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT 2
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 8-1

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Chapter 8 Preparers’ Qualifications
The preparers of this HRER are alphabetically listed below.

Carson Anderson, principal architectural historian (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Mr. Anderson has a master’s degree in architectural history from the University of Virginia and a bachelor’s degree in architecture from the University of California, Berkley. He has more than 20 years of experience in conducting architectural/historic surveys, including Section 106 and CEQA compliance research and analysis.

Jessica B. Feldman, principal architectural historian (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Ms. Feldman has a master’s degree in historic preservation from Columbia University and a bachelor’s degree in history and art history from William Smith College. She has more than 13 years of experience in conducting architectural/historic surveys, including Section 106 and CEQA compliance surveys.

Elizabeth Hilton, principal architectural historian (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Ms. Hilton has a master’s degree in historic preservation from the Art Institute of Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in historic preservation and community planning from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. She has more than 8 years of experience in conducting architectural/historic surveys, including Section 106 and CEQA compliance surveys.

Stephen D. Mikesell, principal architectural historian (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Mr. Mikesell has a master’s of arts degree in history from the University of California, Davis and a bachelor’s of arts degree in history from Harvard University.

He has more than 20 years of experience in the field of historic preservation.

Mark Robinson, co‐principal investigator archaeology (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Mr. Robinson has bachelor’s degree in geology and history from the University of Montana and a master’s degree in Anthropology from the University of Oregon, and more than 30 years of experience conducting NEPA/SEP, and CEQA compliance work survey work, lithic material identification and analysis, and conducting pre‐historic‐ and historic‐related research.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 8. Preparers’ Qulaifications
HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION REPORT 8-2

SANTA ANA BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION
Paul Shattuck, archaeologist (PQS), consultant with ICF International. Mr. Shattuck has a bachelor’s degree in anthropology from the University of California, Los Angeles with more than 18 years of experience doing prehistoric and historic archaeology related research and survey work.

Rick Starzak, principal architectural historian, consultant with ICF International. Mr.

Starzak has a master’s of art degree in architecture from the University of California, Los Angeles and more than 30 years of experience in the field of historic preservation consulting.

EXHIBIT 2
Appendix
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
Appendix A
Department of Parks and
Recreation Forms: DPR 523
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Other Identifier:
*
Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted a. County
b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ; R ; 1/4 of 1/4 of Sec ; B.M. c. Address City Zip
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear feature) Zone , mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g. parcel #, legal description, directions to resource, elevation, additional UTMs, etc. as app * P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) * P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) * P4. Resources Present:

The primary façade is symmetrically aligned and three bays wide. The main entrance is accessed through a central porch that is capped by a side gable roof supported by columns. Flanking the entrance is a double-hung wood frame window. Landscaping consists of a grass lawn with mature trees and bound by a metal fence.

HP02 Single family property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1900 , 1901 TRW/Experian
Daniel R. Brimlow
1820 NW Carty Road
Ridgefield, WA 98642
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1019 E Washington Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1019 E Washington Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: Colonial Revival
Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1900.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Esparza, an orange picker for the Irvine Company. At that time, Augstin resided here with his wife, Tibusia. Research did not indicate that Mr. Esparza or his wife are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1019 E. Washington Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 1019 E.

Washington Street is a good, but not exceptional, example of residential architecture; it lacks high artistic values as well as integrity of feeling and setting. 1019 E. Washington Street is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.
1954 City Directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The one-story residence at 1042 Lincoln Avenue in Santa Ana has medium-pitch, side-gable roof with a small extension over the entry on the north side of the primary façade. The front façade, which faces east, has three bays, with the entry at the north corner.

The fenestration consists of a single, two-over-two, double-hung wood sash at the south end and a tripartite window with a multipane fixed center sash flanked by two narrow, two-over-two, wood sash windows. The exterior is clad in wide wood clapboard.

There are vertical wood slats with rounded ends in the gable ends. The entry door is obscured by a metal security door. There is a second, single-family house at the rear of the property which was not observed during survey. The property has a wood picket fence on a concrete base along the street boundary and an automatic metal gate at the driveway entrance. There is a large mature tree in the front yard.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1950 Building Permit
Abelardo Mata & Julieta Zuniga
1044 Lincoln Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1042-1044 Lincoln Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1042-1044 Lincoln Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style:

Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1950.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that any of the aforementioned residents of the property are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1042-1044 Lincoln Avenue ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 1042-1044 Lincoln Avenue is a good, but not exceptional, example of residential architecture; it lacks high artistic value as well as integrity of setting and feeling. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.
1923, 1933, 1954 City directories
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP02 Single family property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1922 Building Permit
Ruben Parga
PO Box 1960
Garden Grove, CA 92842
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1030 Lincoln Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1030 Lincoln Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: National
Construction History:

Building permit #7981 was issued in 1922 to H. Parga. In 1950, a permit was issued to Parga for asbestos siding. A garage was permitted in 1953. A "Use & Occupancy" permit was issued for a body & fender shop here, under a 1 year temporary basis in 1958. Permit for reroofing in 1982.

Moved? Santiago Street
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: SF Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:

The house was sold to Mr. Parga for $25 and was rolled to the site on telegraph poles, with the help of barrio residents. There was not enough money to build a solid foundation, so walnut tree stumps were used. b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1922 Property Type SF Architecture Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) According to the 1906 Sanborn Map, there was a two-story dwelling at 1030 Lincoln Avenue, with a garage at the southwest corner of the property. However, according to the building permit, the dwelling at this address was constructed in 1922 and was owned by H. Parga. According to the 1920 US Census records, Hilano Parga, 46, was a laborer and head of his household. The 1923 city directory identified the occupants at this address as Hilarion Parga and Roman Echerarria. Mr. Echerarria was a boarder. Many residential properties in the former Logan Barrio community continued to be occupied by members of the Parga family. In the 1933 city directory, Hilario, owned and occupied this property. At the rear lived Sustinos Pena. In 1954, Henry M.

Parga, a laborer, and his wife Louisa lived at this address. At the rear of the property was Nicholas Saldivar, also a laborer, and his wife Orlencia. According to city permit records, this property was temporarily converted to use as a body and fender shop around 1958. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore, it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the CRHR under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that Mr. Parga, immediate family or tenants are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1030 Lincoln Avenue ineligible for the NRHP under Criterion B or the CRHR under Criterion 2. 1030 Lincoln Avenue is a good, but not exceptional, example of residential architecture; it lacks some integrity of materials and design, and has been expanded. Furthermore, the property has been converted from a residential use to a mixed use property and lacks integrity of feeling, setting and association. 1030 Lincoln Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the NRHP or Criterion 3 of the CRHR. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1920 US Census Records Maria Garcia, Logan Barrio, p. 29.

State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Despite having multiple storefronts, the entire building is connected. 915-921 Santiago Street has a lower roof profile and is set back from the plane of 923-941 Santiago Street's primary façade. It has been clad in T11 siding, all windows are fixed pane with false muntins, and all doors appear to be hollow core, multi-panel replacements. The overhanging roof eave provides some shelter to storefronts. 923-941 Santiago Street has a staggered and varied parapet, obscuring a medium/high-pitch side gable roof with monitors along the roof peak. The building may be of concrete block construction based on the exposed gable ends. The modified storefronts contain no original fenestration; windows are typically fixed or sliding metal sash. Some storefronts are differentiated with the application of different cladding, such as brick veneer and T11 siding. The property allows for no green landscaping; there is a gravel parking area in front of 915-921 Santiago Street.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northwest elevation, view southeast.
3 Santa Ana 92701
1950 Building Permit
Scott LLC
PO Box 4465
Palm Springs, CA 92263
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
915-941 N Santiago Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 915-941 N Santiago Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
923-1941 N. Santiago Street was constructed in 1950, as a five unit office & shops building. The owner was Ferris H. Scott. The building permit is #4552. No building permit was located for 915-921 N. Santiago Street, but additions to this building, which is located on the same parcel as 923-941, were noted in 1955. The owner of this building was also Ferris Scott.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1950 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) These parcels, which occupy the block on the east side of Santiago Street, between Stafford and Vance, were vacant when the Santa Ana Sanborn Maps were published in 1906. At that time, Santiago Avenue was known as “C” Street. When the maps were revised in the late 1940s, there was a street name change and a rectangular building at the corner of Vance and Santiago was occupied by a carpenter’s shop. This one-story, reinforced concrete building was located at 1035 Santiago Street. In the 1954 city directory, there is no information about 915-921 Santiago Street. However, there are individual businesses listed between 923 and 941 Santiago Street. Ayres Scale Models, Inc. occupied the storefront at 923-925 Santiago Street. T.J. Ayres was the President, Jack McDavid was the Vice-President and Mrs. L.C. Ayres was the Secretary-Treasurer of this firm. It is not known if these persons were directly involved or associated with this office. At 929 Santiago Street was Appliance Manufacturing Company, which may have been a garden tools manufacturer or retailer. 933 Santiago Street was occupied by Danz-Schmidt Workshop.

Louis J. Danz was identified as the president of this company, and F.W. Schmidt was identified as the Vice-President of this company, which sold pianos and related musical instruments. It is not clear if they also manufactured pianos. Bullock’s Furniture and Refinishing was located at 935 Santiago Street; Leonce C. Bullock was the proprietor. Warren & Wright Electric(al) Service occupied 937 Santiago Street. This company was run by C.W. Poore & E.O. Wright. At 939 Santiago Street was Mastercraft Company, which made ceramic molds. J.G. Zitterman, Jr. was the owner. And lastly, at 941 Santiago Street, were the offices of the Orange County Builders Association (OCBA). See Continuation Sheet.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1954 city directory Southern California Builders Association. Www.

Socalbuilders.org/history.html
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
32 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
Page of * Resource Name or #: 915-941 N Santiago Street State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HR #
3 Trinomial
(Assigned by recorder
* Recorded by: Elizabeth Hilton * Date: 8/23/2011
Continuation Update
3 B10. Significance Statement, Continued:

According to the history page of the website for the Southern California Builders Association (www. socalbuilders.org/history.html), the Southland Builders Exchange merged with (OCBA) in 1983 and formed the SCBA. Further research revealed that the original name of the OCBA was the Orange County Builders Exchange, which was founded in the early 1920s. The organization commissioned a building in 1928, which was constructed at 200 North Main Street, in downtown Santa Ana. The group became the OCBA in 1938. It is likely that the address on Santiago Street housed a satellite office of the organization.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. A variety of industrial and commercial business have been associated with this property over the years. At this time, there is no one directly associated with the property considered to be important at the local, state or national level, making the entire address ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value, and appears to have lost integrity of materials, design and workmanship due to storefront modifications. It is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register.

This property was not evaluated for local designation.

DPR 523L (1/95) * Required Information
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP02 Single family property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northwest elevation, view southeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1920
Payam & Laila Jahangiri
2109 S Wright Street #F
Santa Ana, CA 92705
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
915 N Logan Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 925 N Logan Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style:

Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1920.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.
1923, 1933, 1954 City Directories
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

It has an overall square footprint. The primary façade, facing west, has two large bays containing the main entrance and full length windows. Both bays are protected by full size metal security bars. The exterior is clad in rough-texture stucco. The south wall extends towards the street and past the plane of the primary façade. There is a low, flat roof extension on the south side, providing a sheltered area. The designed landscape in front of the building displays low concrete walls, and low trimmed hedges.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
West elevation, view East.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1960 Building Permit
Southern California Acquisitions
921 N Logan Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
923 N Logan Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 923 N Logan Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #11909 was issued to Castelan & Berry in 1960 for an office & shop building at this location.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Four single-family, one-story dwellings appear at this address on Map sheet 20 of the 1949 revised Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana. 923 Logan Street appears at the front of the property. Immediately to the south is a rectangular garage. Behind the garage is 923½ Logan Street. At the back of the property are 921 and 921½ Logan Street. The 1954 city directory shows that Juan Diaz, a picker at Orange Citrus, and his wife Ursula, lived at 923 Logan Street. It is not known when the residences were demolished and removed from the property. The current industrial building was constructed in 1960. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the CRHR under Criterion 1. No specific persons associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 923 Logan Street ineligible for the NRHP under Criterion B or the CRHR under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the NRHP or Criterion 3 of the CRHR. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1920 US Census records 1923, 1933, 1954 city directories; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The property at 915-917 N. Logan Street has two residential buildings. The front building is a one-story, single-family residence designed in the gable-front-and-wing style. It has a high-pitch, cross-gable and hipped roof with a shallow eave. The exterior has been reclad in non-original stucco. The windows appear to have been replaced with metal sliding sash and resized. There is a fullwidth front porch on the primary (west) façade, with a dropped, hipped roof. The roofs are covered by composition shingle. The porch roof is supported by wood posts and has a raised, poured concrete foundation. The property is partially bounded by a chain link fence. Inside the fence the landscape consists of tall, trimmed hedges and fruit trees.

The rear property is a one-story single family residence designed in the elements of the Craftsman style. Rectangular in plan, it is capped by a front-gable roof with overhanging eaves and clad in clapboard siding. The façade is asymmetrically aligned and obscured from view due to the carport located to the north of the main (front) residence. Alterations include a front porch and an aluminum sliding window.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northwest elevation, view southeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1923 Building Permit
Bob & Balbino Billa
917 N Logan Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
915-917 N Logan Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 915-917 N Logan Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: Craftsman
Construction History:

The original permit for a residence at this location dates to 1923.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: SF Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1923 Property Type SF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) 1906 Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana shows a small, square, one-story dwelling at this address. A small rectangular, one-story secondary structure was also site on the north side of the parcel. According to the 1923 city directory, Jesus Florez lived at this address. There was no Jesus Florez in the 1920 US Census; however, additional research identified the owner/occupant of 917 Logan Street to be Raymond Flores at the time of the census. Raymond, and his son George (20) are both listed as laborers, cement. Besides George, three additional children lived at this address: Carmela (16), Frank (12) and a daughter (10). Also at this address:60 year old grandparents but their names are not legible either. In the 1933 city directory, Jesus Flores was identified as the owner and occupant of this property. Living at the rear of the property was Juan Cruz. The revised 1949 Sanborn map shows four buildings at 917-919 Logan Street. Two are situated near the street and are single-family, one-story houses. 917 ½ Logan Street, located in the north/center part of the property is a one-story rooming house. At the rear of the property is 917A Logan Street, another single-family, one-story house. Per the 1954 city directory, R.G. Billa owned and lived here. Robert Billa was a laborer at El Toro. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the CRHR under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that any persons of significance at the local, state, or national level are associated with this property, making 915-917 Logan Street ineligible for the NRHP under Criterion B or the CRHR under Criterion 2. This property lacks integrity of materials, design, workmanship, setting and feeling and is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the NRHP or Criterion 3 of the CRHR. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1920 US Census records 1923, 1933, 1954 city directories; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Formerly located at 937 Riverine, 926 Lincoln Street was moved to this location in 1947. This modest Craftsman style residence has a rectangular footprint, with a side-gable roof clad in composition sheeting. The wide, overhanging eaves have curved brackets. The roof pitch is extended over the inset center entry and raised porch. The exterior is clad in narrow clapboard with end boards. The primary façade faces east towards the railroad tracks. The entrance, whose door is obscured by a metal security door, is flanked on each side by a single wood frame casement window. The light arrangement, seen in other windows on the house, consist of four small panes over a large fixed pane. This pattern is repeated in the triple windows to either side of the porch. The porch roof is supported by thick wood posts with flattened capitals and a solid balustrade clad in narrow wood clapboard. The entry is accessed by several brick steps; the foundation also appears to be constructed of brick. The property is surrounded by a high, chain link fence (on Lincoln Avenue) and concrete block wall (on the north and south sides). Inside the perimeter is a welltended lawn, mature trees and small bushes and shrubs.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
c 1920
Abdon Vasquez
926 Lincoln Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
926 Lincoln Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 926 Lincoln Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: Craftsman Bungalow
Construction History:

Building permit #9146 issued for a residence in 1947, moved from another location. Owner was Gregorio & Mary Villagomez.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that Mr. Villagomez or his wife are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 926 Lincoln Avenue ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 926 Lincoln Avenue is a good, but not exceptional, example of a side-gable Craftsman bungalow. Furthermore, confusion about its construction mean it may lack integrity of location, setting, feeling and association. 926 Lincoln Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1954 city directory 1920 US Census records; Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Asymmetrically divided on the east elevation, it features three large garage openings with metal roll-up doors.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1955 TRW/Experian
Santa Ana Industrial Co
1102 E Washington Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1102-1112 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1102-1112 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1955. The property has a secondary address on Washington Boulevard Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1956 Building Permit
Katherine T Swiatek
4008 Channel Place
Newport Beach, CA 92663
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1024-1026 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1024-1026 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
1024 N. Fuller Street was constructed in 1956 (Permit #2011). It was constructed as an industrial building, measuring 100' x 123' 10". The owner was William D. Greschner and Fred Bennett.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1956 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Fuller Street runs north from Santa Ana Boulevard, and dead-ends at the intersection with E. Washington Boulevard. Before 1954, it did not appear on city maps or in city directories. The street is occupied by industrial/commercial buildings. Generally, those on the west side were constructed in the 1950s while those on the east side were constructed after 1981. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William D. Greschner or Fred Bennett, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1019 E. Washington Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

None of the doors were observed during survey; both personnel doors have metal security doors. To the south of the left-side entry is long, rectangular paired window set with sliding metal sash.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1956 Building Permit
Dale E. Swiatek
305 Vaquero Road
Arcadia, CA 91007
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1022 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1022 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
1022 N. Fuller Street was constructed in 1956 (Permit #1995). It was constructed as a 50' x 100' industrial building. The owner was Robert Oakes.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1956 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Fuller Street runs north from Santa Ana Boulevard, and dead-ends at the intersection with E. Washington Boulevard. Before 1954, it did not appear on city maps or in city directories. The street is occupied by industrial/commercial buildings. Generally, those on the west side were constructed in the 1950s while those on the east side were constructed after 1981. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner Robert Oakes, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1022 Fuller Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1954 Building Permit
Dale E Swiatek
305 Vaquero Road
Arcadia, CA 91007
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1020 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1020 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
1020 N. Fuller Street was constructed in 1954-55 (Permit #8108). It was constructed as a warehouse building. The owner was William Greschner.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1954 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Fuller Street runs north from Santa Ana Boulevard, and dead-ends at the intersection with E. Washington Boulevard. Before 1954, it did not appear on city maps or in city directories. The street is occupied by industrial/commercial buildings. Generally, those on the west side were constructed in the 1950s while those on the east side were constructed after 1981. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William D. Greschner, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1020 Fuller Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The exterior is clad in smooth stucco. The single door main entry is set off-center and has a metal security door. To the left of the main entry is long, rectangular metal frame window. The window type is obscured by metal security bars. The primary façade, which faces east, exhibits a large garage-style roll-up metal door to the right of the main entry. There is no landscaping associated with this building.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1954 Building Permit
Richard A. Preston
10 Plaza SQ
Orange, CA 92866
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1016 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1016 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:
1016 N. Fuller Street was constructed in 1954 (Permit #7572). It was constructed as an addition to a warehouse, either 1008-1012 or 1020 N.

Fuller. The owner was William D. Greschner.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1954 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Fuller Street runs north from Santa Ana Boulevard, and dead-ends at the intersection with E. Washington Boulevard. Before 1954, it did not appear on city maps or in city directories. The street is occupied by industrial/commercial buildings. Generally, those on the west side were constructed in the 1950s while those on the east side were constructed after 1981. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William D. Greschner, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1019 E. Washington Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction.

It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

To the north is a pedestrian entrance flanked to the south by two small rectangular windows. The south and north elevations join neighboring buildings, all of which abut the concrete sidewalk along Fuller Street HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1953 Building Permit
Michael Alan Freedman
PO Box 50786
Irvine, CA 92619
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1012 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1012 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

This building was constructed by owner Wm. Grechner for $40,000 in 1953 as a warehouse building (Permit #6532) in combination with 1008 N Fuller Street.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1953 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William Grechner, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1012 Fuller Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 9/8/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

Rectangular in plan, this building is one-story in height and designed in a utilitarian Modern design. Clad in stucco siding, it is capped in a barrel vaulted roof. The east elevation facades Fuller Street and is punctuated by a large elephant door. To the north is a pedestrian entrance flanked by a small rectangular window. The south elevation faces a large parking lot and is characterized by a band of metal roll-up elephant doors. The building abuts the concrete sidewalk along Fuller Street.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1953 Building Permit
Michael Alan Freedman Corp.

PO Box 50786
Irvine, CA 92619
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1006-1008 Fuller Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1006-1008 Fuller Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

This building was constructed by owner Wm. Grechner for $40,000 in 1953 as a warehouse building (Permit #6532) in combination with 1012 N Fuller Street.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1953 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner William Grechner, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1006-1008 Fuller Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 9/8/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
1 Santa Ana 92701
c. 1946
Michael Alan Freedman
PO Box 50786
Irvine, CA 92619
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Steve Mikesell
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

It has a low-pitched front-gable roof and is composed of concrete block. The primary façade is sheltered by a metal awning with slender metal column supports. The fenestration is asymmetrically aligned, punctuated by two metal doors and four fixed windows. The parcel is bound by a cyclone fence topped with barbed wire.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southwest elevation, view northeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1938
Corniche Development Corp.
1681 Loma Roja
Santa Ana, CA 92705
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1143 E Fruit Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1143 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1953.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1953 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The property is not strongly related to the development of a road system in Orange County and that association alone is not sufficient to meet Criterion A, as suggested in the 2004 evaluation designation for 1102 E. Fruit Street. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore, it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1143 Fruit Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks overall high artistic value and contains a very modest building in design, form and construction. The property is not an important example of industrial design and is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) * P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
* P7. Owner and Address:
* P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address)
* P9. Date Recorded:
* P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
* P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none") * Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
Location Map
District Record
Sketch Map
Linear Feature Record
Continuation Sheet
Milling Station Record
Building, Structure, and Object Record
Rock Art Record Artifact Record
Photograph Record Other: (List)
Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) Prehistoric Historic Both
DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information
6Z
1207 E Fruit Street
Map Reference #18
Orange
1207 E Fruit St
Assessor Parcel Number: 398-101-01, 398-101-15, 398-101-16 T 5 R 9 SEC 7 POR E1/2. 1207 E. Fruit Street in Santa Ana is the location of the Phoenix House, a non-profit provider of substance abuse services. The primary building on the property is a one-story, Spanish Colonial Revival building with a cross-gable, red tile roof. Aerial views show that the building footprint is an "O" with a central open courtyard. The primary façade consists of the side-gable central block and two front-gable wings. The central block displays five large arched windows. These five windows are directly below a shallow pent roof with exposed rafter tails and wood brackets. To either side of the main window set are two projecting, flat-roof entrance porticos with arched openings. Six steps with metal railings lead to the entry porticos, under which are double-door sets topped with blind arches. To the outside of each portico are a set of two, smaller, arched windows with similar pane arrangement seen in the center five bays of the central block. The side-gable roof extends down over these windows. All windows have protruding sills, which are in alignment. The wings have a setback from the porticos, but still project beyond the plane of the central block. Each wing has a round window in the gable end. Fenestration on the wings, facing the street, consist of two arched windows, followed by a large inset arch with a double-hung sash. At the far ends of the wings are two narrow, double-hung sash windows. All fenestration appears to be replacement sash. The building is clad with battered stucco. It is set back from the street, with a circular drive in between. There is a grassy area between the drive and the street. The landscape around the main building is fully developed with different varietals of mature palms, trimmed hedges and rose bushes behind a low brick garden wall. The HP06 1-3 story commercial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
South elevation, view north.
3 Santa Ana 92701
1923 , 1952 Building Permit
Phoenix hHuses of California Inc
11600 Eldridge Avenue
Sylmar, CA 91342
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
Phoenix House
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1207 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name: Detention Home of Orange County, McMillan School, "Juvenile Home/Hall" Common Name
Original Use: Commercial
Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival
Construction History:

The Detention Home of Orange County was constructed circa November 1923. No permit was issued as the building was owned by Orange County. Building permit #12566 issued in 1925, possible addition or new structure. Reroofed in 1936. Story added in 1943. New building constructed in 1997, building permit 10113305.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Commercial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Commercial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1923 Property Type Commercial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The Detention Home of Orange County was constructed circa 1923, at a cost of more than $42,000. A second building or an addition, costing $33,290 was built on the premises in 1925. The 1949 Sanborn Map shows two buildings at this location. By 1952, there were three buildings on the property with a total of 26 rooms. Another building is known to have been constructed in 1997. At that time, the operators of the facility, Phoenix House - Orange County, noted that there was a total of 8 buildings on site. Building A is the one that is visible from the public right-of-way and was constructed in the early 1920s. Building B consisted of three portable structures, circa 1996. The dates of construction for Buildings C-H are unknown. 1207 Fruit Street is currently occupied by the Phoenix House, which is a private non-profit provider of substance abuse services.

Phoenix House, which operates facilities in eleven states and the District of Columbia, was founded in 1967. The original building on the property was likely constructed in the early 1920s; because the property was owned by Orange County there is no building permit and the parcel was considered tax-exempt. The address does not appear in the 1922 city directory, but is noted as the Orange County Juvenile Detention Home in the 1933 city directory. 1207 Fruit Street was listed as the County Juvenile Hall in the 1954 city directory. The Spanish Colonial Revival style building, which is the only one currently visible from the public right-ofway, appears on Map sheet 32 of the 1949 revised Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana. The one-story building is constructed with a central courtyard divided down the center by a concrete wall. A kitchen and dining room were identified on the north side (rear) of the building. See Continuation Sheet.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
32 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
Page of * Resource Name or #: 1207 E Fruit Street
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HR #
3 Trinomial
(Assigned by recorder
* Recorded by: Elizabeth Hilton * Date: 8/23/2011
Continuation Update
3 B10. Significance Statement, continued:

The Sanborn Map also shows what appears to be a fence around part of the building, and extending back, or north, in the property. It was not visible during the field survey, although there is a chain link fence part of the property today. Only one other building was shown on the parcel in the 1940s Sanborn map - a rectangular one-story reinforced concrete building identified as the tool house. This building was no longer in existence by 2011. It is not known when it was removed, or if it was moved elsewhere on the property. Phoenix House has subsequently constructed additional buildings on the property.

The period of significance would 1923 to 1951, the period when the original building was constructed and when the Orange County Juvenile Hall program was expanded (Orange County Department of Education, 2005).

Research did not provide additional details regarding the origins of this specific Orange County juvenile hall or the operation of this facility since it was constructed in the early 1920s. No additional information about the founding of a juvenile hall program in the county or in Santa Ana was found during research into local history. It is not known if this was the first building associated with the agency, its choice for this location or the choice of this architecture style. It is not known why this style and type of building was chosen because there is little to no information available on its original construction of subsequent operation. No permit was available for the construction of the original building.

The property is not associated any longer with Orange County's juvenile services programs. By the late 1950s, additional facilities were in use for a boy's ranch and a home for neglected and abused children (Orange County Department of Education, 2005). In 1951, the property at 1207 E. Fruit Street became the David R. McMillian School and in 1959, the juvenile hall was moved to a different site. At that time, the McMillan School was converted to a long-term treatment facility for delinquent youth, and was operated by the Orange County Probation Department (Orange County Department of Education, 2005). Mr.

McMillan had been the county's chief probation officer for more than 20 years when the property was rededicated in his name.

Both the entire property as a whole and the 1920s main building lack integrity of materials, design, workmanship, setting, feeling and association.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with the main building or property as a whole. There is no known association with a particular movement towards the housing and rehabilitation of minors who needed to be housed somewhere other than home or jail.

Therefore neither the 1920s building, nor the entire property is eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No architect was identified as having been associated with its original design; no person was identified as being associated with the development of this property. Therefore, it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion 2 or the California Register under Criterion B.

The main building has been altered with the replacement of its windows and the construction of interior buildings within the courtyard. Over time, the property has been modified by the construction of new buildings, none of which match or compliment the original 1923 Spanish Colonial Revival style building. There was no clear pattern of development or use of the property, either by the county or by authorities with experience in the housing of delinquent or neglected youths. It does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

DPR 523L (1/95) * Required Information
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1952 Building Permit
Maria & Luciano Marquez
1215 E Fruit Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1215 E Fruit Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1215 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Multi-Family Residential
Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional
Construction History:
1215-1217 E. Fruit Street was constructed in 1952. Building permit #2888 was issued to owner H. M. Grimes, Jr. & Others for "4 Unit Apartments & Garages".

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Multi-Family Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1952 Property Type MF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The property at the northwest corner of N. Grand Avenue and E. Fruit Street was originally a large parcel identified as 1225 Fruit Street in the 1949 revised Sanborn Maps (Map sheet #32). At that time, it contained a large two-story house with an irregular footprint and a large one-story secondary structure. This property may have been occupied by a farmhouse and associated barn/garage/stable. By the mid-1950s, it had been subdivided. Kenneth Maynard (USMC) and his wife Marilyn were residing at 1215 Fruit Street in 1954. Living at 1215½ Fruit Street was D.A. Malmstrom, Jr. and his wife Mary. Delvin Malmstrom was a clerk at Del-N-Dick (or Dell-N-Dick) Produce, located at 814 N. 17th Street in Santa Ana.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that any past occupants of the property are considered to be persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1215 E. Fruit Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 1215 E. Fruit Street has lost integrity of materials and design, due in part to the replacement of the windows and modification of the window openings. It is also not a significant example of a multi-family Minimal Traditional style residence. 1215 E. Fruit Street is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit; 1954 city directory Sanborn Fire Insurance maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 1 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Steve Mikesell, ICF *Date: 9/8/11  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Prior Evaluations of the Orange County Highway Department Maintenance Yard The Orange County Highway Department Maintenance Yard (hereafter Maintenance Yard) at 1102-1111 East Fruit Street in Santa Ana, California was evaluated twice in 2004. In the first instance, it was found not to qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP/National Register). In the second instance, it was found to qualify under Criteria A and C.

In 2004, the County of Orange was planning construction of a Santa Ana Art Wall project near the Maintenance Yard. Although it was an entirely different project from the current grade separation undertaking, the area of potential effect (APE) for the Art Wall project included some of the same potential properties as the current undertaking, including the Maintenance Yard. In relation to the Art Wall project, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) on behalf of Orange County, with historic studies prepared by Christeen Taniguchi of Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) (California Department of Transportation, District 12, Historic Property Survey Report, Santa Ana Art Wall Project, 8/26/2004.). The DPR 523 form for the Maintenance Yard is attached, identified as 2004 DPR-1.

In mid-November, 2004, OHP assigned review of this project to an employee of Caltrans Headquarters in Sacramento who was assisting OHP to help review Section 106 documents. On November 22, Caltrans District 12 notified MBA that this employee, acting on behalf of OHP, had questions about the HPSR as it pertained to the Maintenance Yard. On December 2, 2004, Christeen Taniguchi responded to the questions raised following a conversation with the OHP reviewer, and stated that she had “revisited the facts and made this change in eligibility” referring to her decision to classify the Maintenance Yard as “potentially eligible for the NRHP and CR.”( E-mail from Christeen Taniguchi to Dana Supernowicz, “Answers to Santa Ana Art Wall Questions,” December 2, 2004.)” On December 6, 2004, an email exchange between Taniguchi and OHP suggested she reconsider her finding, which had identified the Maintenance Yard as being not eligible under Criterion A (E-mail from Dana Supernowicz to Christeen Taniguchi, “Re:

Answers to Santa Ana Art Wall Questions,” December 6, 2004.) On December 14, 2004, the County resubmitted a revised HPSR and new DPR 523 forms, concluding the Maintenance Yard was eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criteria A and C. The DPR form for this property retained the 6z code (not eligible for the National Register) but the text within the form supported National Register eligibility under both criteria. The second 2004 DPR form is reproduced below, as 2004 DPR-2. On December 27, 2004, OHP concurred in the finding that the Maintenance Yard is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criteria A and C.

Rationale for Re-Evaluation of Property at 1102 East Fruit Street, Santa Ana In both 2004 versions of the DPR 523 forms, the property was evaluated as a potential historic district. The final DPR package included the Primary Record, a District Record, and continuation sheets for description and evaluation. In accordance with the instructions for recordation, the final package should also have included a Primary Record for each building within the district; however, this was not included in the package. The inclusion of the District Record form indicates the intent to treat the property as a potential historic district, and the term “District” is used at several places within the document, but not in the evaluation language through which the eligibility criteria for the National Register were applied to this property. The 2004 evaluation did not take into account other buildings and parcels associated with the Maintenance Yard that were outside of the project area. In light of this, it is necessary to take a new look at the eligibility for the property.

Another concern regarding the determination of eligibility as a historic district is the recordation of only those buildings that were 50 years old at the time of the evaluation. However, there are several newer buildings that were not treated as being part of the property. There are, within the property being evaluated, three buildings that are less than 50 years old, two of which are very large, joining the seven buildings that are more than 50 years old. The only text that addresses these buildings states: “There are also three buildings/structures in the APE that are less than 50 years old. With reference to Exhibit 3 of the HRER, they are notes as: x) a 1960 gas station located at the northeast corner of the property, which replaced a dwelling noted on the 1945 Sanborn map; y) a circa-1980/1990 truck storage building located on the southeast section of the property, replacing an earlier building that existed in the 1928 and 1938 aerial photographs; and z) a post-1970 era open shed located at the southwest corner of the RDMD property. These are not evaluated as part of the District due to age and a historical lack of connection between the historic elements.”
The property being evaluated is 1102-1111 East Fruit Street, Santa Ana, which is described as bounded by Fruit Street, Terminal Street, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)/Metrolink right of way, and a parking lot to the south. This property includes ten buildings: the seven discussed in these forms and the three that are not evaluated.

In applying the instructions for DPR 523 District Records, and in applying the more detailed instructions for recording historic districts in the National Park Service guidelines, the recordation and evaluation of the property does not appear to be accurate.

The resource is the Maintenance Yard, which comprises the older buildings as well as those built between 1960 and 1990. The presence of newer and older buildings affects the integrity of the entire property as well as its eligibility under Criteria A and C. This apparent misapplication of historic district inventory and evaluation methodology supports the need to entertain a new, de novo, evaluation of the property.
(See Continuation Sheet)
EXHIBIT 2
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 2 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Steve Mikesell, ICF *Date: 9/8/11  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
In addition to leaving out the newer buildings at the 1111 and 1102 addresses, the evaluation did not include two large buildings at street addresses 1143 and 1140 East Fruit Street, which have been a part of the Maintenance Yard. These buildings, described below, are on separate Assessor’s Parcels but are functionally a part of the Maintenance Yard. The fact that these buildings were not discussed in the 2004 evaluation supports the need to take a new look at the National Register eligibility of this property.

New Evaluation
The Maintenance Yard does not appear to qualify for listing in the NRHP because it is not significant and because it lacks integrity.

The following discussion presents a historic context for maintenance stations as a property type and then analyzes the property according to the three directly applicable National Register Criteria: A (historic events); B (historic persons); and C (design).

Historic Context for Highway Maintenance Stations
In California, highway construction and maintenance was the responsibility of City and County governments until the formation of the California Division of Highways in the early 20th century. By the 1920s, a formal arrangement had been established through which major through highways were assigned to the Division of Highways while counties were responsible for lesser through routes and cities the city streets (The early history of city, county, and state highways is summarized in Ben Blow, California Highways: A Descriptive Record of Road Development by the State and by Such Counties as Have Paved Highways, 1920. An excellent summary of the situation about 30 years later is found in California Highways and Public Works, Centennial Edition, September 9, 1950.)
The assigned responsibility included construction as well as maintenance of roads. The maintenance responsibility eventually led the Division of Highways to develop the maintenance station as a functional property type, as a place to store maintenance equipment and materials to enable timely delivery of crews, material, and equipment to needed highway projects. The Division of Highways was the principal developer of maintenance stations because it was responsible for thousands of miles of highways, many of which were in remote locations. The distances between equipment sheds and road locations were far smaller for cities and most counties; as a result, the maintenance station as a property type is more closely associated with state rather than city or county highway maintenance organizations.

In January 2000, James Fisher, historian with Caltrans Headquarters, prepared a context statement for maintenance stations of the California Division of Highways, forerunner of today’s Caltrans (James Fisher, “Inventory and Evaluation of Facilities Owned by The California Department of Transportation: Maintenance Stations,” January 2000.). The need for highway maintenance stations grew with the development of maintained, generally paved roads in the late 1910s and 1920s. The Division of Highways began to build permanent maintenance stations in the early 1920s when it became clear that it was less expensive to own than to rent maintenance vehicles and that the vehicles were subject to vandalism and weather damage if left along the roadside.

The State Architect’s office developed a series of “standard plans” for maintenance stations, which could be reproduced at various locations throughout the state. The stations included a series of buildings that were found on essentially all stations, modified to fit the scale of responsibility for the station in question. The State Architect also developed a series of “styles” for these stations that could conform to architectural traditions in various parts of the state: a “Craftsman” style station for Pasadena; a “half-timbered” style for the desert area; a “Spanish” style for coastal Southern California; and so forth (Fisher, p 4.). The state maintenance stations were typically in remote areas and usually included residences: a cottage for the superintendent and bunkhouses for the workers. The station usually included sheds for the equipment, oil and gasoline pumps, sand and gravel yards, and minor equipment repair capabilities.

The Maintenance Yard treated in this report is both similar to and quite different from the state maintenance stations. First, it was built at the edge of Santa Ana, which in the 1920s was the one of the largest cities in Orange County. The facility was built in an industrial area adjoining the railroad tracks. The facility was more of an equipment repair yard than a multi-purpose road maintenance facility, as was commonly the case with the state maintenance yards. And it was not built according to any architectural “style,” as was typically the case with the state yards.

Unfortunately, there is no overall context for county-owned maintenance stations that matches the quality of the Caltrans context for state-owned facilities. Counties, with rare exceptions, are relatively small geographic units, without the need for residential maintenance stations, as were built in large numbers by the state. San Bernardino, a very large county, has organized around selfsustaining road districts in the rural parts of the state, recognizing that the needs for the desert and mountainous parts of the county are quite different (www.specialdistricts.org details how these San Bernardino County special districts operate.). These districts do not, however, necessarily have maintenance stations associated with them. Most counties, including Orange, are sufficiently small as to maintain their roadways from centralized equipment and material yards, to which county workers commute from their private residences.
(See Continuation Sheet)
EXHIBIT 2
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Steve Mikesell, ICF *Date: 9/8/11  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Research conducted by MBA suggests that the Orange County maintains four vehicle repair facilities: this one; another in Santa Ana; one in Anaheim; and one in Crown Valley. Again, these do not appear to be maintenance stations in the manner of stateowned facilities but rather specialized vehicle repair facilities. It is likely that most county-maintained maintenance yards are similar to the subject property, with sheds to store and shops to repair the equipment that is needed to repair county roads.

Evaluation of Significance under National Register Criterion A and California Register Criterion 1 Available evidence does not support a conclusion that the Maintenance Yard in Santa Ana is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion A or California Register under Criterion 1, for its contribution to the transportation history of the County or region. The facility was used to maintain vehicles that were owned by the County to repair and maintain county roads. That vehicle maintenance function does not appear to constitute association “with events that have made significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.” One should stipulate that the development of a road system was assuredly a key occurrence in the broad pattern of history in Orange County and in all of California, which led the nation in the development of a “car culture” and an automobile-based transportation system. It is less certain, however, that this facility for maintaining county road vehicles is significantly associated with the broader theme of developing a road system in the county. As noted in National Register Bulletin 15, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,” “Mere association with historic events or trends is not enough, in and of itself, to qualify under Criterion A: the property's specific association must be considered important as well. For example, a building historically in commercial use must be shown to have been significant in commercial history.” Neither does it appear that the Maintenance Yard is significant within the more limited context of the development of highway-related maintenance facilities.

As a class, maintenance yards played a minor role in the making of a highway system in California. There is little reason to conclude that this property was significant within that limited context. Lacking significance, the property does not appear to qualify for National Register listing under Criterion A or California Register listing under Criterion 1.

Research conducted by MBA indicates that Orange County acquired this property in 1919 to house equipment owned by two county departments: the Road Department and the Agricultural Department. The warehouse building (identified as Building 9 in the MBA analysis) was used by the Agricultural Department from its construction in the early 1920s through the late 1940s. Most of the rest of the buildings were constructed in the 1920s for use by the Road Department. Building 3 was built in the 1920s and is currently used as a “tune up, lube shop, and car wash.” Building 4 was also built in the 1920s and is used for storage. Building 5 was built before 1928 and is a welding shop. Building 7 was built in the early 1940s and enlarged in the 1950s; it is a parts warehouse. Building 7 was built in the 1920s and is a paint and tire shop. Building 8 was built in the 1940s and is a tire storage shed. Building x is a 1960s gasoline station. Building y is a ca. 1990 truck storage building. Finally, Building z is an open shed that was built ca. 1970. (These building numbers were assigned by MBA and it should be noted that they do not reflect the numbering system used by the County.) In addition, the Maintenance Yard includes two additional buildings, with street addresses of 1143 and 1140 East Fruit Street. These likely date to the 1980s and are functionally part of the larger Maintenance Yard.

The buildings, in addition to being constructed over a long period of time, are only loosely related to the development of the road system of Orange County. The buildings were associated directly with the maintenance of county-owned vehicles, which in turn were used to support maintenance of the roads of the county. In this regard, the buildings are best considered within the context of automobile and truck repair facilities in the county, whether operated by the county or by private mechanics. In any event, this association with vehicle storage and repair does not constitute an important association with the development of a road system in Orange County.

Evaluation of Significance under National Register Criterion B and California Register Criterion 2 The historical research conducted by MBA and additional research conducted for the grade separation project does not suggest that this property is associated with a person who is important to our history. All references in the historical record are to the agency – the Orange County Road Department – without reference to any specific individual. Based upon research to date, there is no evidence to support a finding that this property is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion B or California Register Criteiron 2.

Evaluation of Significance under National Register Criterion C and California Register Criterion 3 Available evidence does not support a conclusion that the Orange County Road Department Maintenance Yard Fruit Street in Santa Ana is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion C or California Register under Criterion 3. It does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction and it does not represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.

As noted earlier, the collection of buildings at the Maintenance Yard are best considered as a potential historic district. The buildings are related functionally and were all built by Orange County. Although they were built over a long period of time, the buildings resemble one another in their utilitarian appearance, particularly in the fact that nearly all are sided in corrugated metal and most feature characteristic metal industrial sash.
(See Continuation Sheet)
EXHIBIT 2
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 4 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Steve Mikesell, ICF *Date: 9/8/11  Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
These buildings do not collectively represent an important example of industrial design, whether considered within the contexts of Orange County, Southern California, or California generally. Orange County was until recent decades a center for produce packing and there exist in the county dozens of important industrial buildings from that heritage, including: the National Register-listed Elephant Packing House in Fullerton, a cluster of industrial buildings on Santa Fe Avenue in Fullerton; a cluster of industrial buildings in Irvine Village; and numerous industrial packing buildings in the National Register listed historic district in Orange (ICF retains a printout of the OHP Historic Resource Inventory for Orange County; this list was derived from that copy of the HRI.). This discussion is not meant to suggest that Orange County includes an abundance of important examples of industrial design, but rather that historical industrial buildings are not rare in Orange County.

The cluster of buildings at the Maintenance Yard do not appear to represent a distinguished entity when considered as an ensemble of industrial structures. Most are of a simple gabled roof; the notable exceptions are Building 6, with its sawtoothed roof, Building 8, which has a shed roof; and the post-World War II buildings, which feature flat or very shallow gabled roof forms.

Taken as a whole, this complex does not appear to represent an important collection of industrial buildings. The collection has some degree of consistency in that the bulk of the buildings are metal sided. None of the buildings are important individually and the collection as a whole is not an important example of industrial design in Orange County, Southern California, or California in general.

Discussion of integrity
The integrity of this property can be measured in two ways: the integrity of individual buildings and the integrity of the collection of buildings.

For the most part, the individual buildings appear to retain a good degree of integrity. The exceptions are Building 6, which was expanded well after original construction, and Building 8, which was similarly expanded several decades after it was constructed.

The integrity of the complex, however, is questionable because the complex was constructed over a period of approximately sixty years. An arguement for exceptional significance and a very long period of significance does not appear to be appropriate and, therefore, it would be difficult to conclude the complex retains integrity to any particular historical period of construction.

Conclusion
The 2004 conclusion that the Maintenance Yard is eligible for listing in the National Register under Criteria A or C and California Register under Criteria 1 or 3 is not supported by the facts. The property was only loosely related to the development of a road system in Orange County and does not qualify for that association and for that reason does not appear to meet National Register Criterion A and California Register Criterion 1. The property is not an important example of industrial design and for that reason does not appear to meet National Register Criterion C and California Register Criterion 3. Finally, the integrity of the property is marginal if the three post-1945 buildings are included in the evaluation, as is required under cultural resource best practices and the requirements of the National Register program. For these reasons, the Maintenance Yard does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register and the California Register.

R7. References
California Department of Transportation, District 12, Historic Property Survey Report, Santa Ana Art Wall Project, 8/26/2004.

E-mail from Christeen Taniguchi to Dana Supernowicz, “Answers to Santa Ana Art Wall Questions,” December 2, 2004.

E-mail from Dana Supernowicz to Christeen Taniguchi, “Re: Answers to Santa Ana Art Wall Questions,” December 6, 2004.

The early history of city, county, and state highways is summarized in Ben Blow, California Highways: A Descriptive Record of Road Development by the State and by Such Counties as Have Paved Highways, 1920. An excellent summary of the situation about 30 years later is found in California Highways and Public Works, Centennial Edition, September 9, 1950.

James Fisher, “Inventory and Evaluation of Facilities Owned by The California Department of Transportation: Maintenance Stations,” January 2000.
www.specialdistricts.org details how these San Bernardino County special districts operate.

OHP Historic Resource Inventory for Orange County; this list was derived from that copy of the HRI.

EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The property located at 1140 E Fruit Street contains several buildings on a long rectangular parcel. The buildings are one-story, rectangular in plan, and are surrounded by an asphalt parking lot. The northwestern building (Building 1) is located along the northern border of the parcel, which has a medium-pitched side-gable roof with medal siding. The building is asymmetrically divided with casement windows and metal doors, some which are sheltered by awnings. Located to the south, adjacent to Building 1 is Building 2, a temporary building that was added recently to the lot. Another temporary building is free standing, located between Buildings 1 and 4. The northeastern building (Building 4) is composed of concrete block and features a lowpitched side-gable roof with overhanging eaves and exposed rafter tails. The building extends south along the parcel boundary with the primary façade facing west; the fenestration is asymmetrically divided, containing metal doors and windows. Building 6 is located in the middle of the parcel, and also appears to be a recent structure added to the lot. At the southern parcel boundary is a large open-air metal structure, and a smaller utility shed (Building 8) along the southwest parcel boundary.

HP14 Government building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
c 1950
County of Orange
1143 E Fruit Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
Orange County Maintenance Yard
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1140 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

The buildings located on the parcel appear to have been constructed or moved to the lot circa 1950 to 1980s.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance c 1950 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The property is not strongly related to the development of a road system in Orange County and that association alone is not sufficient to meet Criterion A, as suggested in the 2004 evaluation designation for the adjacent parcel. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore, it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1140 Fruit Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. The property is not an important example of industrial design and is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

The building located at 1160-1172 E Fruit Street is one-story, L-shape in plan, and designed in a Modern style. Capped by a flat roof, the building is composed of tilt-up concrete construction. Asymmetrically divided into two sections, the most projecting section is void of fenestration. The primary entrances are located off of the east and recessed north elevations. They are composed of metal and glass doors and sheltered by awnings. Each entrance bay is framed by a concrete pilaster and caped by a belt course. A large asphalt clad parking lot is sited within the L-shape area, and the parcel is framed by a newly constructed metal fence.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1960
Los Dos Amigos
1170 E Fruit Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1160-1172 E Fruit Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1160-1172 E Fruit Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #12524 was issued to Tom Markham in 1960. This permit shows that the following addresses had been combined: 1160, 1162, 1164, 1166, 1168, 1170 and 1172 E. Fruit Street. The permit was for a large storage & manufacturing building, valued at $70,000.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1960. Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) No buildings appear at this address/parcel on the 1949 Sanborn Map (Map sheet #32). There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner Tom Markham, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1160-1172 Fruit Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
c 1920
Pacific Legacy Real Estate Ivest
17853 Santiago Blvd #1104-454
Villa Park, CA 92861
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
742-744 N Eastwood Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 742-744 N Eastwood Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Multi-Family Residential
Architectural Style: elements of the Spanish Colonial Revival Construction History:

No original building permit was located. A permit to reroof the residence in 1944 (Building Permit# 4399) was issued to owner Frances Force.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Multi-Family Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance c 1920 Property Type MF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) 742 Eastwood – A "C"-shaped duplex was shown at this address on the 1949 revised Santa Ana Sanborn Maps. This duplex has a modest footprint and was one-story high. The address is 742-742½ Eastwood Avenue. A small, possibly one-car, one-story garage is located to the south and west of the residence. The 1954 city directory identifies the occupant at 742 Eastwood as J. (Jack) L.

Williams and his wife Peggy. Jack Williams was an employee at Douglas LB, possibly the Douglas Aircraft facility in Long Beach. At 744 Eastwood Avenue was L. (Loren) F. Stone and his wife Lorene. Loren was a lineman for Edison (the electric company later called Southern California Edison). 744 is likely the revised address for 742½ Eastwood Avenue.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 1019 E. Washington Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 742-744 N Eastwood Avenue has lost integrity of materials, design and workmanship, through alterations and replacement of original character-defining features, such as windows and exterior wall treatment. 742-744 N Eastwood Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Maps, 1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP03 Multifamily property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
West elevation, view east.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1952 Building Permit
Abel Bernal & Juana Hernandez
1214 E Fruit Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
741 N Eastwood Avenue and 1214 E Fruit Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 741 N Eastwood Avenue
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Multi-Family Residential
Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional
Construction History:

Jasper Farney was issued a building permit (#2879) on June 11, 1952 for a 8 room duplex and garages at this location. This building has a secondary address at 1214 Fruit Street.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No persons of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 741 N. Eastwood Avenue ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2.741 N. Eastwood Avenue is a good, but not exceptional, example of Minimal Traditional residential architecture; it lacks some integrity of materials, design and workmanship. 741 N. Eastwood Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP02 Single family property
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northeast elevation, view southwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1910 TRW/Experian
DSLMA MTG Loan Trust
Unavailable
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
742 N Grand Avenue
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 742 N Grand Avenue
*
Historic Name: 510 First Street
Common Name
Original Use: SF Residential
Architectural Style: National
Construction History:

The original construction state for this residence is not known. It was moved to its current location in 1945 (building permit #5654) from 510 E.

First Street (building permit for that address was not found). The owner in 1945 was Mildred B. Burnette.

Moved? 510 First Street, Santa Ana
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: SF Residential
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date 1945 Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1910 Property Type SF Residence Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) 742 Grande Street was moved to this location in 1945. It is not known why this house was moved, when it was originally constructed or who was the original owner. The property appears on the 1949 revised Santa Ana Sanborn Maps in its current location. This corner lot also shares the address 1226 Fruit Street. The Sanborn Maps shows a one-car garage was located at the rear of the property; it is unlikely that this garage was constructed at the same time as the residence and moved to the new location in 1945. Mrs. Burnette, the owner in 1945, still lived at this location in 1954, per the city directory. Mrs. Burnette is buried at Fairhaven Memorial Park in Santa Ana. She lived from 1890 to 1956. No other information about Mrs. Burnette was located during the research phase of this project.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. Research did not indicate that Mildred Burnette is considered to be a person of significance at the local, state, or national level, making 742 N. Grand Avenue ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. 742 N. Grand Avenue has lost integrity of materials, design, workmanship, location, and setting.742 N. Grand Avenue is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit, 1949 Sanborn Map
1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
South elevation, view north.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1920 Building Permit
Batool S Japelaghi
17 Colonial
Irvine, CA 92620
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1041 E 6th Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1041 E 6th Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Utilitarian
Construction History:

This building was constructed in 1920. This building has a secondary address as 606 Terminal Way.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1920 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) According to the 1954 city directory, 600 Terminal Way was the Nic-L Silver Battery Company and 606 Terminal Way was the Lippincott Lead Company and Sun Battery Company. Both firms were owned by C.G. Lippincott, who resided at that time in Santa Ana. Further review of the 1949 Sanborn Map shows that there were five buildings in this general location: 600 and 602 Terminal Way were two large rectangular for fabricating processed rock; 601 Terminal Way was a machine shop and 603 was third, smaller building used for rock processing. The fifth building was 606 Terminal, noted as the Sun Battery Company. This large building was drawn with multiple interior partitions and was shown to be a battery lead melting facility. 600, 602, 603 and 606 Terminal Way are no longer on the premises. The current 606 Terminal Way may be the former Sun Battery Company Machine Shop, formerly at 601 Terminal Way. There is no longer any association with the former lead processing operation at this location.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance maps, 1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
Page of * Resource Name or #: 1041 E 6th Street
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HR #
3 Trinomial
(Assigned by recorder
* Recorded by: Elizabeth Hilton * Date: 8/23/2011
Continuation Update
3 P3a. Significance: (Continued)
This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction; it has been altered and lacks integrity of materials, design and workmanship, as well as setting and association. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

DPR 523L (1/95) * Required Information
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southwest elevation, view northeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
c1960
David E Roche
1051 E 6th Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
1041 E 6th Street
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 1041 E 6th Street
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building Permit #8014 was issued in 1946 to owner H.G. Gooder for a 20' x 50' lumber storage shed at this address.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance c1960 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This property does not appear on the 1949 Sanborn map. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner H. G. Gooder, are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 1041 E. 6th Street ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1949 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1947 Building Permit
Ronald & Havis Sewell
530 N Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
530 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 530 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building Permit #8710 was issued for a concrete brick manufacturing building at this address in 1947. The owner at that time was H.G. Gooder.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

King, Jr. No information about the firm or the owners was located during the research phase. There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, such as original owner H.G. Gooder, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 530 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1925 Building Permit
Ray & Laura Connelly Trust
420 Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
510 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 510 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #12779 was issued November 10, 1925 for 506-512 N. Terminal Way. The property was described as a warehouse. The owner was George Ketscher.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Connelly, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 510 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It lacks integrity of materials, design and workmanship. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1949 Sanborn Map, 1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1925 Building Permit
Ray & Laura Connelly Trust
420 N Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
508 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 508 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #12779 was issued November 10, 1925 for 506-512 N. Terminal Way. The property was described as a warehouse. The owner was George Ketscher.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

There were interior openings between all three buildings at that time.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. A variety of companies have occupied this building since it was originally constructed, and no specific persons, such as original owner George Ketscher, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 508Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value, lacks integrity of materials and design, and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1954 city directory, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
East elevation, view west.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1925 Building Permit
Ray & Laura Connelly Trust
420 N Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
506 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 506 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building permit #12779 was issued November 10, 1925 for 506-512 N. Terminal Way. The property was described as a warehouse. The owner was George Ketscher.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1925 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This property was not on the 1906 Sanborn Map of Santa Ana. No property is specifically identified as "508 Terminal Way," on the revised 1949 Sanborn Maps. The 1954 city directory does not have a listing for 508 Terminal Way; 504 Terminal Way is listed as vacant, while 510-512 Terminal is the Connelly Machine Works. The 1949 Sanborn Map (Map sheet # 39) shows 510 Terminal Way was a machine shop, and was also noted as 516 Terminal Way (which may indicate that properties on this street were renumbered). . To the south of 510 Terminal Way was "Unit F," used for storage. Attached to "Unit F" was "Unit E," which shared a common wall with "Unit F" but had no interior openings between them. This may have become 506 Terminal Way. It was used at that time for auto repairing.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. A variety of companies have occupied this building since it was originally constructed, and no specific persons, such as original owner George Ketscher, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 506 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction; it lacks integrity of materials and design. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, 1954 city directory
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

This wall also marks the different roof profiles; the volume to the south has a shallow marquee. The exterior is clad in metal siding. Fenestration appears to be replacement metal or vinyl horizontally sliding sash, all obscured by metal mesh security screens. There are two entrances facing Terminal Way, the primary (east) façade. One is a solid personnel door and the second is a wood door with a glass pane in the upper panel. Further north on the primary façade are two garage-style openings. The property occupies most of the parcel and has no landscaping except for a line of trees along the railroad alignment; there is a associated parking area to the south.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Southeast elevation, view northwest.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1922 TRW/Experian
Ray & Laura Connelly Trust
420 N Terminal Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
420 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 420 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

No building permit was located. Electrical and plumbing permits were located from 1962. The address was listed as 422-430 N. Terminal Way.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. No specific persons, are known to have been associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 420 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks integrity of materials, design and workmanship. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP08 Industrial building
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Northwest elevation, view southeast.
2 Santa Ana 92701
1948 Building Permit
George M Hansen
9382 Hunting Circle
Villa Park, CA 92861
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
531 Terminal Way
Page of
* Resource Name or #: 531 Terminal Way
*
Historic Name:

Common Name
Original Use: Industrial
Architectural Style: Modern
Construction History:

Building Permit #1004, dated September 8, 1948, was issued for a two-room commercial garage. The owner was S.L. Johnson.

Moved?
Related Features:

Architect: Unavailable
B1.

B2.

B3. B4.
* B5.
* B6.
* B7.
* B8.

B9a.
* B10.

B11.
* B12.

B13.
* B14.

Present Use: Industrial
(Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) No Yes Unknown Date Original Location:
b. Builder: Unavailable
Significance: Them Industrial Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance 1948 Property Type Industrial Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) There is no indication that events which have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local, state or national history are directly associated with this individual property; therefore it is not eligible for the National Register under Criterion A or the California Register under Criterion 1. S-J Auto Star occupied this property in 1954, per the 1954 city directory. This property does not appear on the 1949 Sanborn Map. No specific persons, such as original owner S.L. Johnson, associated with this property are known to be important at the local, state or national level, making 531 Terminal Way ineligible for the National Register under Criterion B or the California Register under Criterion 2. This property lacks high artistic value and is a very modest building in design, form and construction. It is therefore ineligible for Criterion C of the National Register or Criterion 3 of the California Register. This property was not evaluated for local designation.

Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes):

References:

Remarks:

Evaluator: Jessica Feldman, ICF
Date of Evaluation: 8/23/2011
(This space reserved for official comments.)
(Sketch map with north arrow required)
TRW/Experian, accessed 8/22/11.

City of Santa Ana, Building Permit
1954 city directory; Sanborn Fire Insurance maps
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HR #
22 NRHP Status Code 6Z
EXHIBIT 2
8/23/2011
State of California -- The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HR #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Page of
Resource Name or #:
*
P1.

P2.

HP37 Highway/trail
HRER, August 2011, Section 106 Review, CEQA Compliance
Intensive
Tracks crossing 4th Street, view east.
1 Santa Ana 92701
1880s
Burlington Northern Santa Fe RR
2650 Lou Menk Drive
Fort Worth, TX 76131
1 Santa Ana Grade Separation Project
Elizabeth Hilton
ICF Jones & Stokes
811 W 7th ST, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
Attachment C
ASR
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
i
Table of Contents
Page
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ ii List of Abbreviated Terms ........................................................................................................................... iii Summary of Findings ............................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Highway Project Location and Description ...................................................... 5 Chapter 3 Sources Consulted .............................................................................................. 6

3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6

3.2 Cultural Resources Literature and Records Search ............................................................. 6

3.3 Summary of Native American Consultation ....................................................................... 7 Chapter 4 Background ....................................................................................................... 11

4.1 Physical Environment ....................................................................................................... 11

4.2 Cultural Setting ................................................................................................................. 11

4.2.1 Ethnography .................................................................................................. 11

4.2.2 Prehistory ...................................................................................................... 11

4.2.3 History ........................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 5 Field Methods .................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 6 Study Findings and Conclusions ..................................................................... 17 Chapter 7 References Cited ............................................................................................... 18 Appendix A Maps
Survey Coverage Map
EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
ii
List of Tables
Page
Table 1 Previously Recorded Cultural Resource Sites within the APE ........................................... 8 Table 2 Summary of Native American Contacts ............................................................................. 9 EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
iii
List of Abbreviated Terms
amsl above mean sea level
APE area of potential effects
ASR archaeological survey report
B.P. before present
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CHL California Historical Landmarks
CHRIS California Historic Resources Inventory System
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
Department California Department of Transportation
EIR/EIS environmental impact report/environmental impact statement HPSR Historic Property Survey Report
HRER Historic Resources Evaluation Report
HRI Historic Resources Inventory
MLD Most Likely Descendent
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
PA Programmatic Agreement
PHI Points of Historical Interest
PQS Professionally Qualified Staff
PSR Project Study Report
SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
1 Summary of Findings
This archaeological survey report (ASR) was prepared on behalf of the City of Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation (Department), District 12, for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project (proposed project). The proposed project is located in Orange County, in the City of Santa Ana. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐ grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) is located on the Orange and Tustin U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5‐minute topographic maps (see Appendix A), in unsectioned portions of the former Rancho de Santa Ana. Elevations within the project site range from approximately 131 to 141 feet above mean sea level (amsl).

A literature and records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on July 19, 2011. The search included a review of all recorded archaeological sites within a one‐mile radius of the project site as well as the cultural resource reports on file. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted by ICF regarding the project on August 8, 2011. A response from the commission on August 10, 2011, indicated that no sites within the project area have been designated as sacred lands, according to a search of the Sacred Lands File. The NAHC also provided a list of Native American groups and individuals who might have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Letters and maps describing the proposed project and indicating the APE for the proposed project were sent to these 15 Native American representatives on September 2, 2011. No replies have been received. Phone calls will be made to these Native American contacts 30 days after the mailing date of the letters.

A Phase I archaeological survey of the APE was undertaken on September 11, 2011 by Mark C.

Robinson, RPA. Mr. Robinson holds an M.S. degree in anthropology from University of Oregon (1998) and has 17 years of experience in southern California archaeology. Mr. Robinson meets the Professionally Qualified Staff (PQS) standards for Principal Investigator, Prehistoric Archaeology.

The APE for the proposed project was observed to be completely developed with commercial and industrial buildings, residential properties, lawn, and paving. No areas of open, undisturbed land were identified. The few parcels in the APE not occupied by building, pavement, or landscaping were graveled and had been previously disturbed. No archaeological resources were observed during the survey of the APE.

It is the Department’s policy to avoid cultural resources whenever possible. Further investigations may be needed if unanticipated cultural sites are encountered that cannot be avoided by the project. If cultural materials are discovered during construction, all earth‐ moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area will be diverted until a qualified archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find. If changes are made EXHIBIT 2
Summary of Findings
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
2 to the proposed project, an additional archaeological survey would be required to include areas not previously surveyed.

At this time, the person who discovered the remains will contact the District 12 Environmental Branch so that they may work with the MLD on the respectful treatment and disposition of the remains. Further provisions of PRC 5097.98 are to be followed as applicable.

EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
3 Chapter 1 Introduction
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at‐grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California (see Historic Property Survey Report [HPSR] Attachment A, Figures 1 and 2). The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project. The proposed project would include the construction of an underpass bridge (i.e., roadway going under the railroad tracks) and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities.

The APE was established as the limits of proposed construction, including the limits of the current and proposed right‐of‐way, temporary construction easements plus a sufficient buffer to allow heavy equipment to maneuver, and staging areas. The height of the vertical APE is the existing grade level. The maximum depth of the vertical APE would be approximately 25 feet for excavation of the underpass structure. Six‐foot diameter cast‐in‐drilled‐hole (CIDH) pile extensions would be used at the bents and driven steel HP piles (HP 14x89) would be used at the abutments. The proposed pile lengths are anticipated to be 55 feet and 70 feet at the bents and the abutments, respectively. The APE is located on the Orange and Tustin U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5‐minute topographic maps (see Appendix A), in unsectioned portions of the former Rancho de Santa Ana. Elevations within the project site range from approximately 131 to 141 feet above mean sea level (amsl).

This archaeological survey report (ASR) has been prepared in order to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The ASR is used to document identification and recordation efforts for prehistoric and historical archaeological resources.

This ASR implements the revised regulations (amendments effective August 5, 2004) of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the Protection of Historic Properties (36 CFR 800).

It was prepared in conformance with the format set forth in Caltrans’ Standard Environmental Reference Environmental Handbook, Volume 2, Chapter 5, Prehistoric Archaeological Resources (August 2009), and Chapter 6, Historical Archaeological Resources (June 2009), as well Exhibit

5.1 (June 2009) and Exhibit 6.2 (June 2009).

A Phase I cultural resources survey of the APE for the proposed project was performed in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The APE was surveyed on September 11, 2011, by Mark C. Robinson, RPA. Mr. Robinson holds an M.S. degree in anthropology from University of Oregon (1998) and has 17 years of experience in southern EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 1. Introduction
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
4 California archaeology. Mr. Robinson meets the Professionally Qualified Staff (PQS) standards for Principal Investigator, Prehistoric Archaeology.

Prior to the field investigations a literature and records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on July 19, 2011. The search included a review of all recorded archaeological sites within a one‐mile radius of the project site as well as the cultural resource reports on file. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted by ICF regarding the project on August 8, 2011. A response from the commission on August 10, 2011, indicated that no sites within the project area have been designated as sacred lands, according to a search of the Sacred Lands File. The NAHC also provided a list of Native American groups and individuals who might have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Letters and maps describing the proposed project and indicating the proposed project APE were sent to these 15 Native American representatives on September 2, 2011. No replies have been received. Phone calls will be made to these Native American contacts 30 days after the mailing date of the letters.

EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
5 Chapter 2 Highway Project Location and
Description
The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at‐grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California (see Historic Property Survey Report [HPSR] Attachment A, Figures 1 and 2).

Currently, 66 trains cross Santa Ana Boulevard at this location on weekdays. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at‐grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard.

The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I‐5) southbound off‐ramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul‐de‐sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard.

The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three (3) lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project.

The project also proposes to use Fruit Street as a detour route during the final phase of construction. New right‐of‐way, including both permanent acquisition and temporary easements, would be needed for the construction of the shoofly and detour road.

Construction staging areas for the proposed project would potentially be located on the following properties: APNs 398‐093‐13, 398‐092‐12, and 398‐207‐01. The disposal site for the EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 2. Highway Project Location and Description
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
6 proposed project, if needed, would be selected by the contractor. Any environmental clearances related to the disposal site will be obtained by the contractor prior to construction.

EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
7 Chapter 3 Sources Consulted

3.1 Introduction
A records search, Native American consultation, and a review of the Sacred Lands files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and other contacts were conducted for the proposed project. The Departments’ Historic Highway Bridge Inventory was also consulted. These efforts are described below.

3.2 Cultural Resources Literature and Records Search
Prior to the archaeological field investigation, a literature and records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on July 19, 2011. The search included a review of the following sources:
 All available cultural resource survey and site records recorded at the South Central Coastal Information Center, a unit of the California Historic Resources Inventory System (CHRIS);  The National Register of Historic Places;
 California Register of Historical Resources;
 California Inventory of Historic Resources;
 California Historical Landmarks (State of California 1996);  California Points of Historical Interest (State of California 1992); and  Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory.

The search included a review of all recorded archaeological sites within a one‐mile radius of the project site as well as a review of the on‐file cultural resource reports. In addition, records from California Points of Historical Interest (PHI), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and the California State Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) were reviewed.

The record search revealed that 60 cultural resource surveys have been conducted within a one‐mile radius of the project APE. Of these surveys, two encompassed small parts of the project APE.

Record search results indicated that a total of 72 cultural resources had been previously recorded within the one‐mile record search radius. Four built environment resources have been previously recorded within the APE (see Table 1); no prehistoric or historical archaeological sites or isolated artifacts have been identified within the project APE.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 3. Sources Consulted
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
8 Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resource Sites within the APE Primary Number Trinomial Description
30-176663 None Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad segment (formerly the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe)
30-176664 None Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad segment (formerly the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe)
30-176801 None 1111 East Fruit Street, Buildings #1, #2 30-176802 None Orange County Maintenance Yard
1102 East Fruit Street, Buildings #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, ,#8, #9 An additional 59 built environment resources have been previously recorded within the APE.

Nine historical archaeological sites, all vacant lots where older homes were removed, also have been previously recorded within a one‐mile radius of the APE; none are in proximity to the APE.

Currently, there are four NRHP/CRHR, listings within a one‐mile radius of the project APE, all built environment resources. One PHI, also one of these built environment resources, is within the one‐mile radius of the project APE. No CHL, NRHP, or HRI listings are within a one‐mile radius of the project APE. None of these resources are within the APE.

3.3 Summary of Native American Consultation
The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was contacted by ICF International regarding the project on August 8, 2011. A response from the commission on August 10, 2011, indicated that no sites within the project area have been designated as sacred lands, according to a search of the Sacred Lands File. The NAHC also provided a list of 15 Native American groups and individuals who might have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area (see HPSR Attachment F).

Letters and maps describing the proposed project and indicating the APE for the proposed project were sent to these 15 Native American representatives on September 2, 2011. The names and affiliation of these groups and individuals are listed on Table 1 below. No replies have been received. A first round of telephone contact calls was made to these Native American contacts or their representatives on October 28, 2011, with the results provided in Table 1 below. The Native American consultation information is included as Attachment D of the HPSR.

Table 2. Summary of Native American Contacts
Native American
Group/Individual
Date of First
Contact: Letter
Dates of
Replies
Date of Second
Contact: Phone Summary of Conversation
Bernie Acuna, GabrielinoTongva Tribe
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message for Beverly Garcia, who represents the tribe for Ms.

Acuna, and requested that she
return the all if she has any
comments on the project.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 3. Sources Consulted
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
9 Cindi Alvitre,
Chairwoman, Ti’at
Society
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Attempted to phone Ms. Alvitre,
telephone not in service.

David Belardes,
Chairperson, Juaneno
Band of Mission Indians,
Acjachemen Nation
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Mr. Belardes is represented by Ms.

Joyce Perry, see below.

Linda Candelaria,
Chairwoman, GabrielinoTongva Tribe
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Ms. Candelaria is represented by Ms. Beverly Garcia, see above.

Alfred Cruz, Cultural
Resources Coordinator,
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Mr.

Cruz return the phone call if he has
any comments on the project.

Robert F. Dorame, Tribal
Chair/Cultural, Gabrielino
Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Mr.

Dorame return the phone call if he
has any comments on the project.

Sam Dunlap,
Chairperson, Gabrielino
Tongva Nation
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Mr.

Dunlap return the phone call if he
has any comments on the project.

Anita Espinoza, Juaneno
Band of Mission Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Ms.

Espinoza return the phone call if
she has any comments on the
project.

Sonia Johnston, Tribal
Chairperson, Juaneno
Band of Mission Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Ms. Johnston is represented by Mr.

Alfred Cruz, see above.

Anthony Morales,
Chairperson,
Gabrielino/Tongva Band
of Mission Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Mr. Morales stated that as with all trenching and excavation, it was
necessary to be vigilant. Mr.

Morales had no other concerns or
requests.

Joyce Perry,
Representing Tribal
Chairperson, Juaneno
Band of Mission Indians,
Acjachmen Nation
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Ms.

Perry return the phone call if she
has any comments on the project.

Anthony Rivera,
Chairman, Juaneno Band
of Mission Indians,
Acjachemen Nation
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Mr. Rivera is represented by Ms.

Joyce Perry, see above.

Rebecca Robles, United
Coalition to Protect
Panhe
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Left a message requesting that Ms.

Robles return the phone call if she
has any comments on the project.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 3. Sources Consulted
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
10 Tommy John Rosas,
Tribal Administrator,
Tongva Ancestral
Territorial Tribal Nation
09/02/11 None None Mr. Rosas is available only by email.

Adolph “Bud” Sepulveda,
Vice Chairperson,
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians
09/02/11 None 10/28/11 Mr. Sepulveda is represented by
Mr. Alfred Cruz, see above.

EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
11 Chapter 4 Background

4.1 Physical Environment
The project area is located on the Orange County plain, a broad, level expanse of land adjacent to the Pacific coast. Prior to historical settlement of the area, the plain was characterized by extensive inland prairies and coastal lagoons. Marshlands fed by fresh or salt water also once covered many portions of the area. The Orange County plain is traversed by several watercourses, most notably the Santa Ana river. The project area is very flat, with elevations ranging from approximately 131 feet to 141 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The entire surface area of the project APE has been modified by urban development and landscaping.

4.2 Cultural Setting

4.2.1 Ethnography
The project area lies within the territory of the Gabrielino Native American people (Bean and Smith 1978). The Gabrielino are characterized as one of the most complex societies in native southern California, second perhaps only to the Chumash, their coastal neighbors to the northwest. This complexity derives from their overall economic, ritual, and social organization (Bean and Smith 1978; Kroeber 1925).

The Gabrielino, a Uto‐Aztecan (or Shoshonean) group, may have entered the Los Angeles Basin as recently as 1500 B.P. In early protohistoric times, the Gabrielino occupied a large territory including the entire San Fernando Valley and Los Angeles Basin. This region encompasses the coast from Malibu to Aliso Creek, parts of the Santa Monica Mountains, the San Fernando Valley, the San Gabriel Valley, the San Bernardino Valley, the northern parts of the Santa Ana Mountains, and much of the middle to the lower Santa Ana River. They also occupied the islands of Santa Catalina, San Clemente, and San Nicolas. Within this large territory were more than 50 residential communities with populations ranging from 50 to 150 individuals. The Gabrielino had access to a broad and diverse resource base. This wealth of resources, coupled with an effective subsistence technology, well developed trade network, and ritual system, resulted in a society that was among one of the most materially wealthy and culturally sophisticated cultural groups in California at the time of contact (McCawley 1996).

4.2.2 Prehistory
The prehistoric occupation of southern California is divided chronologically into four temporal phases, or horizons (Moratto 1984). Horizon I, or the Early Man Horizon, began at the first appearance of people in the region approximately 12,000 years ago and continued until approximately 5000 B.C. Although little is known about these people, it is assumed that they were semi‐nomadic and subsisted primarily on game.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Background
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
12 Horizon II, also known as the Millingstone Horizon or Encinitas Tradition, began around 5000 B.C. and continued until approximately 1500 B.C. The Millingstone Horizon is characterized by widespread use of milling stones (manos and metates), core tools, and few projectile points or bone and shell artifacts. This horizon appears to represent a diversification of subsistence activities and a more sedentary settlement pattern. Archaeological evidence suggests that hunting became less important and that reliance on collecting shellfish and vegetal resources increased (Moratto 1984).

Horizon III, the Intermediate Horizon or Campbell Tradition, began around 1500 B.C. and continued until approximately A.D. 600–800. Horizon III is defined by a shift from the use of milling stones to an increased use of mortars and pestles, indicating a greater reliance on acorns as a food source. Projectile points become more abundant and, together with faunal remains, they indicate an increased use of both land and sea mammals (Moratto 1984).

Horizon IV, the Late Horizon, which began around A.D. 600–800 and terminated with the arrival of Europeans, is characterized by dense populations; diversified hunting and gathering subsistence strategies, including intensive fishing and sea mammal hunting; extensive trade networks; use of the bow and arrow; and a general cultural elaboration (Moratto 1984).

4.2.3 History

4.2.3.1 Mission Period
European settlement of California began in 1769 at San Diego. Mission San Gabriel was established in the Los Angeles basin in 1771, San Juan Capistrano in 1775, and the Los Angeles pueblo was established as a civilian settlement on September 4, 1781. The goal of the mission system was to convert the native peoples to Catholicism, gain control of the native population, and establish self‐sufficient communities.

4.2.3.2 Mexican Period
In 1821, Mexico won independence from Spain and subsequently became a republic. In 1833, the Mexican government secularized the missions and began to redistribute mission land holdings. The Mexican government also made a large number of land grants to its citizens in an effort to promote settlement in California and to discourage claims on the territory by the United States and Russia. During the period between 1833 and 1846 approximately 700 land grants were conferred, twenty of which were wholly or partially within the boundaries of Orange County.

4.2.3.3 American Period
In 1848, at the end of the war between Mexico and the United States, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, giving control of California to the United States. The acquisition of EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Background
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
13 California by the United States and the discovery of gold in 1849 drew many Euro‐Americans into California. California developed rapidly and was admitted to the Union in 1850. However, the great population influx was limited primarily to central California, San Francisco, and the Gold Rush region of the Sierra Nevada. Southern California grew slowly during this time.

Although the Yorba family claim to its ranch was upheld again by the U.S. Land Commission (1855), the number and conflicting nature of claims by heirs as well as other non‐family claimants led to the partition of the rancho in 1866 (Cleland 1962). Among the non‐family claimants was Jacob Ross, Sr. Three years later, Ross sold 74 acres of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana to Kentuckian William D. Spurgeon, who then founded the City of Santa Ana.

Orange County
California counties were delineated in 1850. The 500 residents located in the Santa Ana Valley of what is now known as Orange County, were included at the time within the boundaries of Los Angeles County. In 1889, a proposal was approved for the creation of Orange County.

The mild southern California weather made Orange County an ideal place to produce oranges.

In 1875, the first commercial grove of Valencia oranges in Southern California were planted in Fullerton. Orange County became an official county in 1889; the namesake was derived from the numerous orchards that occupied the area. During the 1930s, Orange County was producing a sixth of the nation’s Valencia orange crop. Oranges covered only 20,000 acres by the 1960s, with less than a dozen packing houses remaining. The Valencia orange continued to be Orange County’s most profitable product until 1966, when the number of orchards was greatly reduced due to development. Walnuts also proved to be very profitable for the county.

During the 1920s through the 1960s the County was producing a large portion of the world’s crop of soft‐shelled walnuts (Orange County).

In addition to agriculture, the petroleum oil production and processing industry was a major factor in the development of Orange County. The first producing oil well in the County was drilled in Brea in 1882; however, these early oil production efforts in the Brea area were overshadowed by the major strikes at Placentia in 1919 and at Huntington Beach in 1920. By the 1960s, long after urban development had supplanted nearly all agricultural acreage in the County, oil production remained a prominent visual feature on the landscape (Orange County).

Santa Ana
The City of Santa Ana was founded by William H. Spurgeon in 1869. The area Spurgeon chose for the town site was the covered with tall stands of yellow mustard and was bounded on the south by First Street, on the west by Broadway (formerly West Street), on the north by Seventh Street, and on the east by Spurgeon Street (Goddard and Allen 1968). Spurgeon operated the town’s general store and its first post office and served as postmaster for the Santa Ana Valley area residents. He induced Wells Fargo into providing stage coach service to the fledgling community by cutting a three‐mile road to the north where it approached the so‐called “Rodriguez Crossing” of the Santa Ana River (Swanner 1953). Spurgeon seems to have worked tirelessly to promote the success of Santa Ana, spearheading the incorporation movement and efforts to bring railroad service to the community.

EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Background
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
14 In 1877, J.H. Fruit, James McFadden and Spurgeon organized a company known as the Western Development Company in order to raise the funds needed to encourage the Southern Pacific Railroad to extend its line to Santa Ana from Anaheim. The Atchison Topeka Santa Fe Railroad reached Santa Ana by 1887. Two train depots were once located in the project area; the last one standing was demolished to accommodate the larger depot built in 1985 that is sited on the west side of the tracks in the APE.

The train depot location, just north of Fruit Street, was used as an opportunity to create a new business district and sell land at a larger profit margin than had been the case previously in developing Santa Ana. This subdivision is the present location of the project area. The depot area encompassed some 160 acres northeast of the original town site. It was platted as commercial property with 25‐foot street frontages, streets were laid out parallel with, or at right angles to, the Southern Pacific track, thus at an angle to all the other streets in town. The Western Development Company was unsuccessful in its efforts to entice businesses to relocate from the original town site to the depot tract. Consequently, the land was re‐subdivided for residential, and eventually, industrial purposes. Due to its physical separation from the earlier business core and the proximity to the city’s railroad corridors, the subdivision attracted working class families and was one of the few areas in the city where real estate agents would sell property to Mexican Americans (Swanner 1953). By the late nineteenth century, this became the genesis of the Logan Barrio.

Logan Barrio
Most of the properties were owner‐occupied in the Logan Barrio area, which was first settled at the turn of the century. City directories, Sanborn Maps and US Census records show that in many cases, extended family members shared the residences or built small auxiliary dwellings on individual parcels. The 1920 US Census records for Lincoln Avenue and Logan Street show that most men living in the neighborhood worked as general laborers. Residents of this area also may have been employed by the warehouses to the south, as fruit packers, or as pickers in the many citrus farms in the immediate area.

Lincoln Avenue, located within the project area, was the eastern boundary of the Logan Barrio.

The north boundary may have been E. Washington Street. When the Sanborn Maps for Santa Ana were published in 1906, the south end of Lincoln Avenue ended at Depot Street, just a few blocks from the Santa Fe and Southern Pacific depots. “C” Street, later Santiago Street, and the lumber yards and mills of J.M. Griffith Company provided the western boundary of the Logan Barrio. This was primarily a residential neighborhood until the 1950s. In the 1950s, many single‐family homes were demolished, and parcels, especially along Lincoln Avenue, were merged into large lots occupied by small businesses and industrial facilities.

In the post‐World War II era, most of the undeveloped parcels of the Logan Barrio were occupied. Several businesses were located at the intersection of Stafford and Logan Streets, including stores and a bakery. Today, most properties along Lincoln Avenue are industrial; although, some residential properties still remain. Logan Street remains primarily residential, EXHIBIT 2
Chapter 4. Background
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
15 although many of the original dwellings from the 1920s have been demolished and replaced with contemporary single‐family homes.

When the City of Santa Ana incorporated in June 1886, it boasted a population of 2,000.

Spurgeon became its first mayor (Goddard and Allen 1968).

The 1910s and early 1920s period was one of major new development in and bordering Santa Ana. In 1912, the voters approved a $1.2 million road improvements bond that led to the paving and improvement of key “inter‐city roads” in Orange County. Three years later more than 108 miles of road work had been completed. By the end of the decade, and continuing into the 1920s, aggressive promotional efforts on the part of the County Board of Supervisors and the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce brought new businesses and a flood of new homeowners into the area (Goddard and Allen 1968).

At the opening of the 1940s, and with a population of only 32,000, Santa Ana continued to be chiefly an agricultural community, serving also as a regional government and business center. It was the locus, almost exclusively, for small‐scale food processing and furniture manufacturing businesses of local and regional scope.

In the early 1940s, most Santa Ana area industrial workers had been commuters to Los Angeles and Long Beach; however, by the 1960s many workers found employment in Orange County, due chiefly to the dramatic expansion of technology‐based manufacturing that the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce and other boosters helped usher in. Historian Pamela Hallan‐Gibson writes that “…a human tsunami swept over Santa Ana and Orange County in the 1950s, taking much of the old culture with it.” This was most notably reflected in the transformation of the landscape “as farmland gave way to urban development (Hallan‐Gibson 2002).” The population figures starkly convey this change. In 1940, there were 130,760 inhabitants in the county. By 1960, the Orange County population had grown to approximately 704,000 (Hallan‐Gibson 2002).”
EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
16 Chapter 5 Field Methods
A survey of the APE was undertaken on September 11, 2011 by Mark C. Robinson, RPA.

Mr. Robinson holds an M.S. degree in anthropology from University of Oregon (1998) and has 17 years of experience in southern California archaeology. Mr. Robinson meets the Professionally Qualified Staff (PQS) standards for Principal Investigator, Prehistoric Archaeology.

The project APE was observed to be completely developed with commercial and industrial buildings, residential properties, lawn, and paving (see Appendix A: Survey Coverage Map).

No areas of open, undisturbed land were identified. The few parcels in the APE not occupied by building, pavement or landscaping were graveled and had been previously disturbed.

EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
17 Chapter 6 Study Findings and Conclusions
No archaeological resources have been previously recorded within the APE, and no new cultural resources were observed within the APE for the proposed project during this investigation.

Portions of the APE disturbed by previous railroad, road, and building construction are unlikely to preserve intact buried archaeological deposits, because earthmoving for this previous construction was extensive. Disturbance on the level areas of the APE is difficult to determine but extended at least four or five feet below the ground surface. In the project vicinity, prehistoric sites are usually located adjacent to water sources or attractive resources. T he setting of the APE on an open area with no adjacent resources, such as a dependable water source or bedrock outcrops, indicates that it is unlikely to encompass buried cultural resources at shallow depths. Given the geologic setting of the APE and the level of previous disturbance, the potential to encounter buried prehistoric resources within the project APE is considered to be low.

The project APE encompasses part of one of the older neighborhoods in Santa Ana, originally developed in the late Nineteenth Century. Portions of the APE may preserve early historical archaeological resources such as trash pits or privy pits. However, the direct construction area of the APE has been disturbed by the construction of streets and the replacement of homes by small business and industrial buildings during later development, which may have disturbed or removed historical archaeological resources. Therefore, the potential to encounter intact historic‐period archaeological resources within the project APE is considered to be low.

It is the Department’s policy to avoid cultural resources whenever possible. Further investigations may be needed if unanticipated cultural sites are encountered that cannot be avoided by the project. If cultural materials are discovered during construction, all earth‐ moving activity within and around the immediate discovery area will be diverted until a qualified archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the find. If changes are made to the proposed project, an additional archaeological survey would be required to include areas not previously surveyed.

If human remains are discovered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that further disturbances and activities shall cease in any area or nearby area suspected to overlie remains, and the county coroner contacted. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, if the remains are thought to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC, who will then notify the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). At this time, the person who discovered the remains will contact Caltrans District 12, Environmental Division, Cultural Studies Branch, so that they may work with the MLD on the respectful treatment and disposition of the remains. Further provisions of PRC 5097.98 are to be followed as applicable.

EXHIBIT 2
Archaeological Survey Report
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
18 Chapter 7 References Cited
Bean, L. J., and C. R. Smith
1978 Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, California, R. F. Heizer (ed.), pp. 538–549. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.

Cleland, Robert Glass
1962 The Irvine Ranch. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library.

Goddard, Francelia B. and Allen W.
1968 In A Hundred Years of Yesterdays: A Centennial History of the People of Orange County and Their Communities. Available online at:
www.santaanahistory.com/local_history.html
Hallan‐Gibson, Pamela
2002 Orange County: The Golden Promise – An Illustrated History. Sun Valley, CA:

American Historical Press.

Kroeber, Alfred
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bulletin 78, American Bureau of Ethnology. Reprinted in 1976. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

McCawley, W.
1996 The First Angelinos. Malki Museum Press/Ballena Press Cooperative Publications.

Moratto, Michael J.
1984 California Archaeology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Orange County 2011
“A Brief History of Orange County” County Clerk’s Office online at:
http://www.ocsd.org/vgnfiles/ocgove/Clerk‐Recorder/DOC
Swanner, Charles D.
1953 Santa Ana: A Narrative of Yesterday, 1870‐1910. Claremont, CA: Saunders Press
EXHIBIT 2
Appendix A Maps
Survey Coverage Map
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
Project Location
Figure 4
Survey Coverage Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Cultural\Fig04_area_surveyed.mxd SM (09-14-11) Source: USGS 7.5' Quad, CA:

Anaheim, Orange,
Newport Beach, & Tustin
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
District: 12
County: Orange
Route: Santa Ana Boulevard
Federal Project No.: STPL 5063(136)
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
Attachment D
NAHC and Native American Correspondence
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
Attachment E
Interested Parties
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
811 West 7th Street, Suite 800  Los Angeles, CA 90017  tel. 213.627.5376  fax 213.627.6853 www.icfi.com
August 29, 2011
Re: Historic and Cultural Resources Documentation for the Santa Ana Grade Separation, City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California.

To ____________:

The City of Santa Ana, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Department), is proposing to grade separate the existing Santa Ana Boulevard/Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Metrolink at-grade railroad crossing in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California. The purpose of the proposed project is to eliminate the at-grade crossing of Santa Ana Boulevard and the OCTA Metrolink tracks by creating a grade separation, including depressing the profile of Santa Ana Boulevard under the adjacent Metrolink tracks to: enhance traffic operations; improve pedestrian and bicycle user safety; improve emergency response times; and reduce existing traffic congestion along Santa Ana Boulevard. The proposed project improvements extend along Santa Ana Boulevard from approximately Santiago Street at the west end to the west side of the Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound offramp intersection with Santa Ana Boulevard. As part of the grade separation the proposed project includes: minor improvements to the Santa Ana Boulevard/Santiago Street intersection; terminating Logan Street north of Santa Ana Boulevard by constructing a cul-de-sac; and improvements to Fuller Street, both north and south of Santa Ana Boulevard. The project proposes to relocate Santa Ana Boulevard approximately 30 feet south of its existing alignment, to construct a utility corridor on the north side of the roadway, and to maintain the existing lane configuration of three (3) lanes in each direction for the entire length of the project. The proposed project will include the construction of an underpass bridge and retaining walls, installation of paving, curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, streetlights, landscape and irrigation features, drainage facilities, and the relocation of utilities.

As part of our research, ICF is contacting local historical organizations, museums, and city planning departments to help identify any historic buildings, districts, sites, objects, or archaeological sites of importance within the project area. We are conducting research on the properties within the Project area to determine their archaeological, architectural, and historical importance. Our assessments will be based on the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. Any information you can provide will help assure that these properties will be considered as a part of the environmental process.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the proposed project, please feel free to contact Elizabeth Hilton at (213) 627-5376 or by email at [email protected]. We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Hilton
Architectural Historian, ICF International
Enclosure: Map of project area.

EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
5 405
5 5
405
55 91
261
73 57
72 22
133
90 133
90 261
72 91
261
57 22
Anaheim
Santa Ana
Irvine
Orange
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove
Fullerton
Tustin
Fountain Valley
Newport Beach
Westminster
Tustin Foothills
Placentia
Villa Park Villa Park
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map
Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
Source: ESRI StreetMap
North America (2008)
0 0.5 1 2
Miles
San Bernardino
Riverside
Imperial San Diego
Orange
Los Angeles
Kern
P a c i f i c
O c e a n
K:\Irvine\GIS\Projects\AECOM\00452_11\mapdoc\Fig01_Regional_Vicinity.mxd SM, NB (09-19-11) Project Site
District: 12
County: Orange
Route: Santa Ana Boulevard
Federal Project No.: Federal Project Number: STPL 5063(136) EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
Attachment F
SHPO Correspondence
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
ARNOLD SCHW/1.RZENEGGER. Governor
~ "' " ,-,. .
:" ..
! ..: ,
,
",',..-
,
S:TATt OF CALJ,FORNIA -THE RESOURCES AGENCY
=--

OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
P.o BOX 942896
SACRAMENTO, CA 94296-0001
(916) 653-6624 Fax. (916) 653-9824
[email protected]
www.ohp.parks.ca.gov
December 27, 2004
Reply to: FHWAO41103A
Smita Deshpande
Chief, Environmental Planning Branch C
California Department of Transportation, District 12
3337 Michelson Drive, Suite 380
Irvine, CA 92612-8894
RE: Determinations of Eligibility and Finding of Effect for the Santa Ana Art Wall Project, Orange County, California EA 633701
Dear Ms. Deshpande,
I have received your letter dated December 14,2004, regarding the proposed Santa Ana Art Wall Project. Consultation for this undertaking is conducted pursuant to the Programmatic Agreement among the Federal Highway Administration, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the California Department of Transportation Regarding Compliance with Section i 06 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as it Pertains to the Administration of the Federal-aid Highway Program in California (PA).

You have submitted a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) documenting your efforts to identify historic properties located within the project's area of potential effects (APE). You state that two architectural properties were identified within the APE that required formal evaluation. The first property is located at 1102 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #1) and consists of seven buildings associated with Orange County's road maintenance department. The second property is located at 1111 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #2) and consists of two buildings associated with the General Petroleum Corporation of California. You have recommended that the various buildings and structures that comprise 1102 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #1) are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A and C, and that the property identified as 1111 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #2) is not eligible for the NRHP. Your reason for determining SAA W # 1 eligible is its high level of integrity , its relative scarcity among other similar highway maintenance facilities in or near Orange CoUnty , and its utilitarian industrial architecture associated with roads and highway mai.'1tenance h'1 Orange Cou.'1ty since t.~e 1920s I have reviewed the initial and supplemental documentation regarding the Santa Ana Art Wall Project and concur with your finding that the property located at 1102 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #1) is eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A and C and that the property located at 1111 E. Fruit Street (SAA W #2) is not eligible for the NRHP .

EXHIBIT 2

Page 2 of 2 ends

Santa Ana City CouncilMay 5, 2026

Santa Ana City Council
May 5, 2026