Agenda packet — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, October 8, 2024 (part 6 of 10)

3. Impact on Home Insurance Costs:

The addition of high-power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance companies to raise premiums further, exacerbating the already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

4. Property Value Concerns: The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the proposed power lines could adversely af
fect property values in our community, posing a significant concern for homeowners who have invested substantially in their properties.

5. Aesthetic Impact: The installation of large electric poles and wires would detract from the visual

appeal of our neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well-maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

6. Complexity and Inconvenience: The construction and maintenance of these power lines could disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closu res, and restricted access to homes.

Moreover, frequent power outages and service interruptions may result from ongoing maintenance activities.

7. Exploring Alternatives: We urge the city to explore alternative solutions such as upgrad ing
existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs.

These alternatives offer long-term benefits in terms of safety, reliability, and minimal aesthetic impact. Additionally, investigating advanced technologies and alternative routing options could help mitigate the adverse effects on our community.

As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, and a member of a community directly affected by this proposal,
I strongly oppose the installation of power lines in route A and B. I implore Silicon Valley Power to consider alternative options(route C)
We strongly recommend utilizing the existing underground channel near Payne Place if Route A or B is chosen. For your reference, the Payne Place community already benefits from underground electric lines, eliminating the need for overhead lines in that area. that prioritize public health and safety and minimize adverse impacts on Santa Clara residents.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter, and eagerly await your response.

Sincerely
Leonard Le
2146 Payne Pl, Santa Clara
lenny
[email protected]
Payne Place Community
Concerns Regarding new 115 kV power lines
Diem Nguyen <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 1:55 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

Having reviewed the materials provided by your office and attended the recent public scoping meeting on May 23, 2024, I have delved into the details of the project.

After careful consideration, I must voice
my complete opposition to options A and B.

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

1. Health Concerns:

The potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to unsafe levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by these high-power electric lines are paramount.

Numerous studies have indicated a possible correlation between EMF exposure and various health issues, including heightened risks of certain cancers an d neurological disorders, especially
in children and the elderly. I have extensively researched this topic and found compelling evidence supporting these concerns. For instance, there is extensive research supporting that magnetic fields generated by the proposed power lines far exceed safe levels for human exposure, posing significant risks to residents, particularly those living within close proximity to the installation site.

2. Increased Risk for Catastrophic Accidents and Fire Hazards: The proposed route intersects with an already congested utility zone along Lafayette Street, heightening the risk of accidents and fire hazards, especially given the proximity to existing railway lines, residential buildings, and heavy vehicular traffic.

3. Impact on Home Insurance Costs
: The addition of high-power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance companies to raise premiums further, exacerbating the already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

4. Property Value Concerns: The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the

proposed power lines could adversely affect property values in our community, posing a significant concern for homeowners who have invested substantially in their properties.

5. Aesthetic Impact: The installation of large electric poles and wires would detrac t from the visual
appeal of our neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well-maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

6. Complexity and Inconvenience: The construction and maintenance of these power lines could

disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closures, and restricted access to homes.

Moreover, frequent power outages and service interruptions may result from ongoing maintenance activities.

7. Exploring Alternatives: W
e urge the city to explore alternative solutions such as upgrading existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs.

As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, and a member of a community directly affected by this proposal,
I strongly oppose the installation of power lines in route A and B. I implore Silicon Valley Power to consider alternative options(route C) that prioritize public health and safety and minimize adverse impacts on Santa Clara residents.

We strongly recommend utilizing the existing underground channel near Payne Place if Route A or B is chosen.

For your reference, the Payne Place community already benefits from underground electric lines, eliminating the need for overhead lines in that area.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter, and eagerly await your response.

Sincerely
Diem Nguyen
2146 Payne Pl, Santa Clara
[email protected]
Payne Place Community
Re: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community (Mission Gardens) for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS)
Yuri Kleban π <[email protected]>
Thu 5/30/2024 4:06 PM
To: Allie Jackman <[email protected]>
Cc: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>
Thank you for the update Allie, much appreciated. Let me know if I can provide any more info. ---
Yuri Kleban | Global Partnerships Tools -
Global Product Lead Manager | Google |
I am part of the g2g coaching program in Google. Sign up at go/coachyuri This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it went to the wrong person.

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:44 PM Allie Jackman <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Concerned Resident of Santa Clara,

Thank you for submitting a comment on Silicon Valley Power’s Northern Receiving Station (NRS) to Kifer Receiving Station (KRS) 115 kV Transmission Line Project. Your comment has been recorded and will be addressed and responded to in detail within the upcoming CEQA document (IS/MND). As a reminder, once the CEQA document is published, there will be another opportunity for public comment. We have added your information to our notification list for this project.

We look forward to continuing to work with you on this important project.

Best regards,

ALLIE JACKMAN, P.E.

Principal Electric Utility Engineer
D: 408-615-6639
881 Martin Avenue, Santa Clara, CA 95050
www.siliconvalleypower.com

From: Yuri Kleban π <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 1:56 PM
To: Allie Jackman <[email protected]>
-------
Subject: Re: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community (Mission Gardens) for the upcoming SVP project connecng the Northern R eceiving Staon NR S to Kif er receiving staon (KR S)

Hello there,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

Having reviewed the materials provided by your office and attended the recent public scoping meeting on May 23, 2024, I have delved into the details of the project. After careful consideration, I must voice my complete opposition to options A and B.

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

1. Health Concerns: The potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to unsafe levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by these high-power electric lines are paramount. Numerous studies have indicated a possible correlation between EMF exposure and various health issues, including heightened risks of certai n cancers and neurological
disorders, especially in children and the elderly. I have extensively researched this topic and found compelling evidence supporting these concerns. For instance, there is extensive research supporting that magnetic fields generated by the proposed power lines far exceed safe levels for human exposure, posing significant risks to residents, particularly those living within close proximity to the installation site.

Residents living in close proximity to these high power lines are at greater risk. I have gone through several medical and scientific research papers published on this matter that support our concern on this matter.

Here are a few links for reference to some such research articl es:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590107/
https://www.hydroone.com/poweroutagesandsafety_/corporatehealthandsafety_/EMFs/Trans mission_Line_EMF_Fields.pdf
https://www.emrss.com/blogs/emr-shielding-solutions-blogs/what-are-safe-levels-of-emf

As a quick overview from these please see below:

The magnetic field generated by the high power lines is way beyond safe levels for humans.

Here is a break up:
· 115kV power transmission line has a Mean Magnetic Field (mG) of 6.5 at a distance of <50 feet.
· 230kV power transmission line has a Mean Magnetic Field (mG) of 19.5 at a distance of <50 feet. ( ref.

Link2)

Link3) per numbers listed above,
it's evident that residents in close proximity will be exposed to very high unsafe levels of •
•
•
EMF. This will have a significant impact to all the residents within 50-75 feet. As mentioned ,more reference to various NIH research articles on Pubmed can also be provided if needed to reinforce the concerns.

While I am speaking up as a resident of Mission Gardens, there are many other houses and apartment complexes along and near Lafayette St. whose residents will also be impacted by the unsafe levels of EMF.

Even a small risk is substantial for public health safety and can and should not be ignored by authorities; we need to err on the side of caution.

2. Increased Risk for Catastrophic
Accidents and Fire Hazards: The proposed route
intersects with an already congested utility zone along Lafayette Street, heightening the risk of accidents and fire hazards, especially given the proximity to existing railway lines, residential buildings, and heavy vehicular traffic.

3. Impact on Home Insurance Costs: The addition of high-power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance companies to raise premiums further, exacerbating the already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

4. Property Value Concerns: The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the proposed power lines could adversely affect property values in our community, posing a significant concern for homeowners who have invested substantially in their properties.

5. Aesthetic Impact: The installation of large electric poles and wires would detract from the visual appeal of our neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well-maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

6. Complexity and Inconvenience
: The construction and maintenance of these power lines could disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closures, and restricted access to homes. Moreover, frequent power outages and service interruptions may result from ongoing maintenance activities.

7. Exploring
Alternatives: We urge the city to explore alternative solutions such as upgrading existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs. These alternatives offer long-term benefits in terms of safety, reliability , and minimal
aesthetic impact. Additionally, investigating advanced technologies and alternative routing options could help mitigate the adverse effects on our community.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. I eagerly await your response and the opportunity to collaborate on finding a satisfactory resolution. ---
Yuri Kleban | Global Partnerships Tools - Global Product Lead Manager | Google |

I am part of the g2g coaching program in Google. Sign up at go/coachyuri

This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it went to the wrong person.

The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message from your computer. Thank you
Concerns Regarding new 115 kV power lines
Niaz Khan <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 2:15 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

1. Health Concerns: The potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to unsafe levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by these high-power el ectric lines are paramount.

Numerous studies have indicated a possible correlation between EMF exposure and various health issues, including heightened risks of certain cancers and neurological disorders, especially in children and the elderly. I have extensively researched this topic and found compelling evidence supporting these concerns. For instance, there is extensive res earch supporting that magnetic
fields generated by the proposed power lines far exceed safe levels for human exposure, posing significant risks to residents, particularly those living within close proximity to the installation site.

3. Impact on Home Insurance Costs: The addition of high-power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance companies to raise premiums further
, exacerbating the already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

4. Property Value Concerns: The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the proposed power lines could adversely affect property values in our community , posing a significant
concern for homeowners who have invested substantially in their properties.

5. Aesthetic Impact: The installation of large electric poles and wires would detract from the visual appeal of our neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well-maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

6. Complexity and Inconvenience
: The construction and maintenance of these power lines could disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closures, and restricted access to homes.

Moreover, frequent power outages and service interruptions may result f rom ongoing maintenance
activities.

7. Exploring Alternatives: We urge the city to explore alternative solutions such as upgrading existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs.

As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, and a member of a community directly affected by this proposal,
I strongly oppose the installation of power lines in route A and B. I implore Silicon Valley Power to consider alternative options (route C) that prioritize public health and safety and minimize adverse impacts on Santa Clara residents.

We strongly recommend utilizing the existing underground channel near Payne Place if Route A or B is chosen. For your reference, the Payne Place community already benefits from underground electric lines, eliminating the need for overhead lines in that area.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter
, and eagerly await your response.

Sincerely
Niaz Khan
2134 Payne Place, Santa Clara, 95054
[email protected]
Payne Place Community
Concerns Regarding new 115 kV power lines.
gayathri ch <[email protected]>
Thu 5/30/2024 8:20 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Hi To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

Health Concerns: The potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to unsafe levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by these high-power electric lines are paramount. Numerous studies have indicated a possible correlation between EMF exposure and various health issues, including heightened risks of certain cancers and neurological disorders, especially in children and the elderly. I have extensively researched this topic and found compelling evidence supporting these concerns. For instance, there is extensive research supporting that magnetic fields generated by the proposed power lines far exceed safe levels for human exposure, posing significant risks to residents, particularly those living within close proximity to the installation site.

Increased Risk for Catastrophic Accidents and Fire Hazards: The proposed route intersects with an already congested utility zone along Lafayette Street, heightening the risk of accidents and fire hazards, especially given the proximity to existing railway lines, residential buildings, and heavy vehicular traffic.

Impact on Home Insurance Costs: The addition of high-power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance companies to raise premiums further, exacerbating the already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

Property Value Concerns: The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the proposed power lines could adversely affect property values in our community, posing a significant concern for homeowners who have invested substantially in their properties.

Aesthetic Impact: The installation of large electric poles and wires would detract from the visual appeal of our neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well-maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

Complexity and Inconvenience: The construction and maintenance of these power lines could disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closures, and restricted access to homes. Moreover, frequent power outages and service interruptions may result from ongoing maintenance activities.

Exploring Alternatives: We urge the city to explore alternative solutions such as upgrading existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs. These alternatives offer long-term benefits in terms of safety, reliability, and minimal aesthetic impact. Additionally, investigating advanced technologies and alternative routing options could help mitigate the adverse effects on our community.

As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, and a member of a community directly affected by this proposal, I strongly oppose the installation of power lines in route A and B. I implore Silicon Valley Power to consider alternative options(route C) that prioritize public health and safety and minimize adverse impacts on Santa Clara residents.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter, and eagerly await your response.

Sincerely
Gayathri Chebrolu
2102 Payne Pl, Santa Clara, CA - 95054
[email protected]
Payne Place Community
Concerns Regarding new 115 kV power lines.

Anupama Raman <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 2:53 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, and a member of a community directly affected by this proposal,
I strongly oppose the installation of power lines in route A and B. I implore Silicon Valley Power to consider alternative options(route C) that prioritize public health and safety and minimize adverse impacts on Santa Clara residents.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter, and eagerly await your response
Anupama swaminath
2126 Payne place
Santa Clara , CA-95054
Sent from my iPhone
Concerns Regarding new 115 kV power lines
Shaheen Khan <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 2:58 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

1. Health Concerns: The potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to unsafe levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by these high-p ower electric lines are
paramount. Numerous studies have indicated a possible correlation between EMF exposure and various health issues, including heightened risks of certain cancers and neurological disorders, especially in children and the elderly. I have extensively researched this topic and found compelling evidence supporting these concerns. For instance, there is extensive research supporting that magnetic fields generated by the proposed power lines far exceed safe levels for human exposure, posing significant risks to residents, particularly those living within close proximity to the installation site.

2. Increased Risk for Catastrophic
Accidents and Fire Hazards: The proposed route intersects with an already congested utility zone along Lafayette Street, heightening the risk of accidents and fire hazards, especially given the proximity to existing railway lines, residential buildings, and heavy vehicular traffic.

3. Impact on Home Insurance Costs: The addition of high-power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance companies to raise premiums further, exacerbating the already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

4. Property Value Concerns: The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the proposed power lines could adversely affect property values in our community , posing a
significant concern for homeowners who have invested substantially in their properties.

5. Aesthetic Impact: The installation of large electric poles and wires would detract from the visual appeal of our neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well-maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

6. Complexity and Inconvenience:

The construction and maintenance of these power lines could disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closures, and restricted access to homes.

Moreover, frequent power outages and service interruptions may result from ongoing maintenance activities.

7. Exploring Alternatives: We urge the city to explore alternative solutions such as upgrading existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs.

As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, and a member of a community directly affected by this proposal,
I strongly oppose the installation of power lines in route A and B. I implore Silicon Valley Power to consider alternative options (route C) that prioritize public health and safety and minimize adverse impacts on Santa Clara residents.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter
, and eagerly await your response.

Sincerely
Shaheen Khan
2134 Payne Place, Santa Clara, 95054
[email protected]
Payne Place Community
new 115 kV power lines
[email protected] <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 3:43 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Re : proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS)
We live at 2138 Payne Place, Santa Clara and are highly concerned about the new 115kV power lines passing through our area.

Request: Please reconsider the installation of power lines in route A and B as that is detrimental to the residents at Payne Place. Please find another route.

Thank you,
Rahul Khona and Abhi Pant
Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community( Mission Gardens) for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS).

Hima Sree MC <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 4:39 PM
To: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>
To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

1. Health Concerns: The potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to unsafe levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by these high-power electric lines are paramount. Numerous studies have indicated a possible correlation between EMF exposure and various health issues, including heightened risks of certain cancers and neurological disorders, especially in children and the elderly. I have extensively researched this topic and found compelling evidence supporting these concerns. For instance, there is extensive research supporting that magnetic fields generated by the proposed power lines far exceed safe levels for human exposure, posing significant risks to residents, particularly those living within close proximity to the installation site.

Here are a few links for reference to some such research articles:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590107/
https://www.hydroone.com/poweroutagesandsafety_/corporatehealthandsafety_/EMFs/Transmission_Line_EMF_Fields.pdf https://www.emrss.com/blogs/emr-shielding-solutions-blogs/what-are-safe-levels-of-emf As a quick overview from these please see below:

The magnetic field generated by the high power lines is way beyond safe levels for humans. Here is a break up:
· 115kV power transmission line has a Mean Magnetic Field (mG) of 6.5 at a distance of <50 feet. · 230kV power transmission line has a Mean Magnetic Field (mG) of 19.5 at a distance of <50 feet. ( ref. Link2)

Link3) per
numbers listed above, it's evident that residents in close proximity will be exposed to very high unsafe levels of EMF. This will have a significant impact to all the residents within 50-75 feet. As mentioned ,more reference to various NIH research articles on Pubmed can also be provided if needed to reinforce the concerns.

Even a small risk is substantial for public health safety and can and should not be ignored by authorities; we need to err on the side of caution.

1. Increased Risk for Catastrophic Accidents and Fire Hazards: The proposed route intersects with an already congested utility zone along Lafayette Street, heightening the risk of accidents and fire hazards, especially given the proximity to existing railway lines, residential buildings, and heavy vehicular traffic.

2. Impact on Home Insurance Costs: The addition of high-power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance companies to raise premiums further, exacerbating the already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

3. Property Value Concerns: The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the proposed power lines could adversely affect property values in our community, posing a significant concern for homeowners who have invested substantially in their properties.

4. Aesthetic Impact: The installation of large electric poles and wires would detract from the visual appeal of our neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well-maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

5. Complexity and Inconvenience
: The construction and maintenance of these power lines could disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closures, and restricted access to homes. Moreover, frequent power outages and service interruptions may result from ongoing maintenance activities.

6. Exploring Alternatives: W
e urge the city to explore alternative solutions such as upgrading existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs. These alternatives offer long-term benefits in terms of safety, reliability, and minimal aesthetic impact.

Additionally, investigating advanced technologies and alternative routing options could help mitigate the adverse effects on our community.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. I eagerly await your response and the opportunity to collaborate on finding a satisfactory resolution.

Himasree Chundi
1849 Silva place
Santa Clara, CA-95054
Mission Gardens
--
:-P Smile.....And the world smiles with you :-P
Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community( Mission Gardens) for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS).

TheGoteFamily <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 4:46 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; NRS- KRS Project <[email protected]>
To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

1. Health Concerns: The potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to unsafe levels of electromagnetic
fields (EMFs) emitted by these high-power electric lines are paramount. Numerous studies have indicated a possible
correlation between EMF exposure and various health
issues, including heightened risks of certain cancers and neurological disorders, especially in children and the
elderly. I have extensively researched this topic and found compelling evidence supporting these concerns. For
instance, there is extensive research supporting that
magnetic fields generated by the proposed power lines far exceed safe levels for human exposure, posing significant risks to residents, particularly those living within close proximity to the installation site.

Here are a few links for reference to some such research articles:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590107/
https://www.hydroone.com/poweroutagesandsafety_/corpor
atehealthandsafety_/EMFs/Transmission_Line_EMF_Fields
.pdf
https://www.emrss.com/blogs/emr-shielding-solutions-
blogs/what-are-safe-levels-of-emf
As a quick overview from these please see below:

The magnetic field generated by the high power lines is way beyond safe levels for humans. Here is a break up:

Â· 115kV power transmission line has a Mean
Magnetic Field (mG) of 6.5 at a distance of <50 feet.

Â· 230kV power transmission line has a Mean
Magnetic Field (mG) of 19.5 at a distance of <50 feet. ( ref.

Link2)

Link3) per numbers listed above, it's
evident that residents in close proximity will be exposed to very high unsafe levels of EMF. This will have a significant •
•
•
impact to all the residents within 50-75 feet. As mentioned ,more reference to various NIH research articles on
Pubmed can also be provided if needed to reinforce the
concerns.

While I am speaking up as a resident of Mission Gardens, there are many other houses and apartment complexes
along and near Lafayette St. whose residents will also be impacted by the unsafe levels of EMF.

Even a small risk is substantial for public health safety and can and should not be ignored by authorities; we need to err on the side of caution.

2. Increased Risk for Catastrophic Accidents and Fire Hazards:

The proposed route intersects with an already congested utility zone along Lafayette Street, heightening the risk of accidents and fire hazards, especially given the proximity to existing railway lines, residential buildings, and heavy vehicular traffic.

3. Impact on Home Insurance Costs: The addition of high- power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance
companies to raise premiums further, exacerbating the
already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

4. Property Value Concerns: The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the proposed power lines could adversely affect property values in our community, posing a significant concern for homeowners who have invested
substantially in their properties.

5. Aesthetic Impact: The installation of large electric poles and wires would detract from the visual appeal of our
neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well- maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

6. Complexity and Inconvenience: The construction and
maintenance of these power lines could disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closures, and
restricted access to homes. Moreover, frequent power
outages and service interruptions may result from ongoing maintenance activities.

7. Exploring Alternatives: We urge the city to explore
alternative solutions such as upgrading existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs. These alternatives offer long-term benefits in terms of safety, reliability, and minimal aesthetic impact. Additionally, investigating advanced technologies and alternative routing options could help mitigate the adverse effects on our community.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. I eagerly await your response and the opportunity to collaborate on finding a satisfactory resolution.

Sushil Gote
4506 St Palais Place
Santa Clara
CA
4084318629
--
Sushil &Chetna Gote
San Jose, CA
Re: Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community( Mission Gardens) for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS).

Ashwini <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 4:55 PM
To: Gane Sugali <[email protected]>; NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Gane Sugali <[email protected]>
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 2:55 PM, Gane Sugali
<[email protected]> wrote:

To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high- power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

As the project stands today, the first row of houses in Mission Gardens on Lafayette Street will be less than 50 feet from the proposed installation point per Route A of these poles.The safe value of magnetic field around humans is 0.7mg (ref. Link3) per numbers listed above, it's evident that residents in close proximity will be exposed to very high unsafe levels of EMF. This will have a significant impact to all the residents within 50-75 feet. As mentioned ,more reference to various NIH research articles on Pubmed can also be provided if needed to reinforce the concerns.

While I am speaking up as a resident of Mission Gardens, there are many other houses and apartment complexes along and near Lafayette S
t. whose residents will also be impacted by the unsafe levels of EMF.

Even a small risk is substantial for public health safety and can and should not be ignored by authorities; we need to err on the side of caution.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. I eagerly await your response and the opportunity to collaborate on finding a satisfactory resolution.

Aswini Kumbavath
1921 Silva place Santa Clara 95054
4087189040
Mission Garden community
Concerns Regarding Upcoming High Power Electric Wire Poles in Our Community( Mission Gardens) for the upcoming SVP project connecting the Northern Receiving Station NRS to Kifer receiving station (KRS).
kanupriya kabra <[email protected]>
Wed 5/29/2024 4:55 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).

While acknowledging the necessity of upgrading the city’s power infrastructure, there are several significant concerns that demand attention:

1. Health Concerns: The potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to unsafe levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by these high-power el ectric lines are paramount.

Numerous studies have indicated a possible correlation between EMF exposure and various health issues, including heightened risks of certain cancers and neurological disorders, especially in children and the elderly. I have extensively researched this topic and found compelling evidence
supporting these concerns. For instance, there is extensive research supporting that magnetic fields generated by the proposed power lines far exceed safe levels for human exposure, posing significant risks to residents, particularly those living within close proximity to the installation site.

Here are a few links for reference to some such research articles:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590107/
https://www.hydroone.com/poweroutagesandsafety_/corporatehealthandsafety_/EMFs/Transmissi on_Line_EMF_Fields.pdf
https://www.emrss.com/blogs/emr-shielding-solutions-blogs/what-are-safe-levels-of-emf As a quick overview from these please see below:

The magnetic field generated by the high power lines is way beyond safe levels for humans.

Here is a break up:
· 115kV power transmission line has a Mean Magnetic Field (mG) of 6.5 at a distance of <50 feet.
•
•
•
· 230kV power transmission line has a Mean Magnetic Field (mG) of 19.5 at a distance of <50 feet. ( ref. Link2)

Link3) per numbers listed above, it's evident that
residents in close proximity will be exposed to very high unsafe levels of EMF. This will have a significant impact to all the residents within 50-75 feet. As mentioned ,more reference to various NIH research articles on Pubmed can also be provided if needed to reinforce the concerns.

Even a small risk is substantial for public health safety and can and should not be ignored by authorities; we need to err on the side of caution.

2. Increased Risk for Catastrophic Accidents and Fire Hazards:

The proposed route intersects
with an already congested utility zone along Lafayette Street, heightening the risk of accidents and fire hazards, especially given the proximity to existing railway lines, residential buildings, and heavy vehicular traf
fic.

3. Impact on Home Insurance Costs: The addition of high-power transmission lines in front of residences introduces additional risk factors that could prompt insurance companies to raise premiums further, exacerbating the already soaring home insurance costs in the Bay Area.

4. Property Value Concerns:

The aesthetic and health-related concerns associated with the proposed power lines could adversely affect property values in our community, posing a significant concern for homeowners who have invested substantially in their properties.

5. Aesthetic Impact:

The installation of large electric poles and wires would detract from the visual appeal of our neighborhood, undermining the pride we take in our well-maintained homes and attractive streetscapes.

6. Complexity and Inconvenience:

The construction and maintenance of these power lines could disrupt our daily lives, leading to noise pollution, road closures, and restricted access to homes.

Moreover, frequent power outages and service interruptions may result from ongoing maintenance activities.

7. Exploring Alternatives
: We urge the city to explore alternative solutions such as upgrading existing lines or implementing underground power lines, despite potentially higher upfront costs.

These alternatives offer long-term benefits in terms of safety, reliability, and minimal aesthetic impact.

Additionally, investigating advanced technologies and alternative routing options could help mitigate the adverse effects on our community.

Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. I eagerly await your response and the opportunity to collaborate on finding a satisfactory resolution.

Kanupriya Kabra
2029 Garzoni Pl, Santa Clara, CA 95054
Phone: 408-431-3012
Mission Gardens
Concerns Regarding new 115 kV power lines.

Gmail-CL <[email protected]>
Thu 5/30/2024 8:20 AM
To: NRS-KRS Project <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Gmail-CL <[email protected]>
To Whomsoever it may concern,
As a concerned resident of Santa Clara, I am writing to express our apprehensions regarding the proposed installation route for high-power electric transmission lines and poles by Silicon Valley Power (SVP). This initiative is part of the project aimed at connecting the Northern Receiving Station (NRS) and Kifer Receiving Station (KRS).