SB 682 Allen (D) HTML PDF
Environmental health: product safety: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/11/2025 - Set for hearing April 2.
Summary: Current law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control, on or before January 1, 2029, to adopt regulations to enforce specified covered perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) restrictions, which include prohibitions on the distribution, sale, or offering for sale of certain products that contain specified levels of PFAS. Current law requires the department, on and after July 1, 2030, to enforce
and ensure compliance with those provisions
and regulations, as provided. Current law requires manufacturers of these products, on or before July 1, 2029, to register with the department, to pay a registration fee to the department, and to provide a statement of compliance certifying compliance with the applicable prohibitions on the use of PFAS to the department, as specified. Current law authorizes the department to test products and to rely on third-party testing to determine compliance with prohibitions on the use of PFAS, as specified. Current law requires the department to issue a notice of violation for a product in violation of the prohibitions on the use of PFAS, as provided. Current law authorizes the department to assess an administrative penalty for a violation of these prohibitions and authorizes the department to seek an injunction to restrain a person or entity from violating these prohibitions, as specified. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2027, prohibit a person from distributing, selling, or offering for sale a covered product that contain intentionally added PFAS, as defined, except for previously used products and as otherwise preempted by federal law. The bill would define “covered product” to include cleaning products, cookware, dental floss, juvenile products, food packaging, and ski wax, as specified. (Based on 02/21/2025 text)
Location: 03/05/2025 - Senate E.Q.
Introduced: 02/21/2025
Current Text: 02/21/2025 - Introduced
AB 846 Connolly (D) HTML PDF
Endangered species: incidental take: wildfire preparedness activities.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/28/2025 - Re-referred to Com. on W. P., & W.
Summary: The California Endangered Species Act prohibits the taking of an endangered, threatened, or candidate species, except as specified. Under the act, the Department of Fish and Wildlife (department) may authorize the take of listed species by certain entities through permits or memorandums of understanding for specified purposes. Current law requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity -
c::J D
2nd House
~ U "---l >-----<>--l >----< >-----<>--l >----< >-----<>--l >----< > --c::J □
2nd House
..._._, ,u ,----<>--< >-----<>--< >-----<>--l >-----<>---l >---<.>---. > zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Existing law requires a local agency to designate, by ordinance, moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones in i ts jurisdiction within 120
days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal, as provided. This bill would authorize a city, county, city and county, special district, or other local agency to submit to the department a wildfire preparedness plan to conduct wildfire preparedness activities on land designated as a fire hazard severity zone, as defined, that minimizes impacts to wildlife and habitat for candidate, threatened, and endangered species. The bill would require the wildfire preparedness plan to include, among other things, a brief description of the planned wildfire preparedness activities, the approximate dates for the activities, and a description of the candidate, endangered, and threatened species within the plan area. The bill would authorize the department to impose a fee on a local agency for the cost of reviewing a wildfire preparedness plan submitted by that local agency, as specified. The bill would require the department, if sufficient information is included in the wildfire preparedness plan for the department to determine if an incidental take permit is required, to notify the local agency within 90 days of receipt of the wildfire preparedness plan if an incidental take permit or other permit is needed, or if there are other considerations, exemptions, or streamlined pathways that the wildfire preparedness activities qualify for, including, but not limited to, the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection’s California Vegetation Treatment Program. The bill would require the department to provide the local agency, in its notification, with guidance that includes, among other things, a description of the candidate, endangered, and threatened species within the plan area and measures to avoid, minimize, and fully mitigate the tak e of the
candidate, threatened, and endangered species, as provided. (Based on 03/27/2025 text) Location: 03/24/2025 - Assembly W.,P. &
W.
Introduced: 02/19/2025
Current Text: 03/27/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/27/2025
AB 996 Pellerin (D) HTML PDF
Public Resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: California Coastal Planning Fund.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/11/2025 - Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
Summary: Would establish the California Coastal Planning Fund in the State Treasury to help local governments adequately plan for the protection of coastal resources and public accessibility to the coastline. The bill would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, make moneys in the fund available to the commission for various state and local costs relating to local coastal program development and sea level rise plans and to administer the fund, as provided. (Based on 03/10/2025 text)
Location: 03/10/2025 - Assembly NAT.
RES.
Introduced: 02/20/2025 (Spot bill)
Current Text: 03/10/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/10/2025
Transportation Issues LAP
AB 544 Davies (R) HTML PDF
-
CJD
.,______o ---u---0---0--u--cl---c>--tJ---{>--.J--u
Desk Policy FiSUol FIOOf Desk Pol.Cy Fiscal Floor COl'lfCOnc. Enrolled \htoed Chllptered -
CJD
Electric bicycles: required equipment.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/25/2025 - Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
Summary: Current law requires a bicycle operated during darkness on a highway, sidewalk, or bikeway to be equipped with, among other things, a red reflector or a solid or flashing red light with a built- in reflector on the rear that is visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear when directly in front of lawful upper beams of headlamps on a motor vehicle. Current law defines “bicycle” for these purposes to, among other things, include an electric bicycle. Current law defines an electric bicycle as a bicycle equi
pped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor that does not exceed 750 watts of power and categorizes electric bicycles into 3 classes. A violation of the provisions relating to the requirements for equipping a bicycle or an electric bicycle is punishable as an infraction. This bill would require an electric bicycle during all hours to be equipped with a red reflector or a solid or flashing red light with a built-in reflector on the rear that is visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear when directly in front of lawful upper beams of headlamps on a motor vehicle. (Based on 03/24/2025 text) Location: 02/24/2025 - Assembly TRANS.
Introduced: 02/11/2025
Current Text: 03/24/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/24/2025
AB 939 Schultz (D) HTML PDF
The Safe, Sustainable, Traffic-Reducing Transportation Bond Act of 2026.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/10/2025 - Referred to Com. on TRANS.
Summary: Would enact the Safe, Sustainable, Traffic-Reducing Transportation Bond Act of 2026 which, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $20,000,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance transit and passenger rail improvements, local streets and roads and active transportation projects, zero- emission vehicle investments, transportation freight infrastructure improvements, and grade separations and other critical safety improvements. The bill would provide for the sub mission of
the bond act to the voters at the November 3, 2026, statewide general election. (Based on 02/19/2025 text)
Location: 03/10/2025 - Assembly TRANS.
Introduced: 02/19/2025
Current Text: 02/19/2025 - Introduced
SB 63 Wiener (D) HTML PDF
San Francisco Bay area: local revenue measure: transportation funding.
Progress bar
Bill information
2ndHOl.lse
Desk Policy Fiscal Floor Conf Conc Enrol lllld ~oed Chopte,red --c::J □
~ o ---o---u---o--o~-c>-----<.>----{J---{ }-----4~)--lJ Oc~k ~ icy Fiscal Fl00< Desk Policy FiK al Floor Cont.Cone. Enrollllld ~oed Choptered --c::J □
~ ut -----< :>---< )--{ J-----< :>---< )--{ J-----< .>---< )--{ J-----< ) Ocs.k Pol icy Fiscal Fl00< Desk Policy FiKal Floor ConfConc . Enroll ed ~oed Chopterc d Status: 03/25/2025 - From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended.
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
Summary: Would establish the Transportation Revenue Measure District with jurisdiction extending throughout the boundaries of the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa and the City and County of San Francisco and would require the district to be governed by the same board that governs the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize a retail transactions and use tax applicable to the entire district to be imposed by the board of the district or by a qualified voter initiative for a duration of 10 to 15 years, inclusive, and generally in an amount of 0.5%, subject to voter approval at the November 3, 2026, statewide general election. After allocations are made for various administrative expenses, the bill would require an unspecified portion of the proceeds of the tax to be allocated by the commission to initiatives included in a specified commission plan and to the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, the Peninsula Rail Transit District, commonly known as Caltrain, the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency for operating expenses, and would require the remaining proceeds to be subvened directly to the counties comprising the district for public transportation expenses, as prescribed. (Based on 03/25/2025 text) Location: 01/09/2025 - Senate RLS.
Introduced: 01/09/2025 (Spot bill)
Current Text: 03/25/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/25/2025
SB 445 Wiener (D) HTML PDF
Sustainable Transportation Project Permits and Cooperative Agreements.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 02/26/2025 - Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and L. GOV.
Summary: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA, until January 1, 2030, exempts from its requirements certain transportation-related projects if specified requirements are met.
CEQA includes within these exempt transportation-related projects a public project for the institution or increase of bus rapid transit, bus, or light rail service, which will be exclusively used by low-emission or zero-emission vehicles, on existing public rights-of-way or existing highway rights-of-way. This bill would require a lead agency to provide a written notice with specified information to a third-party entity, defined by t he bill to mean a local agency, electrical
corporation, or private telecommunications provider, regarding its need to use, relocate, alter, change, or otherwise improve facilities, publicly owned and managed utilities, public spaces, or other publicly or privately owned facilities under the third-party entity’s jurisdiction or ownership for the implementation of a sustainable transportation project. This bill would define “sustainable transportation project” to mean a project where the lead agency is a stat e agency,
operator, or local agency that proposes the construction or modification of facilities meeting at least one of several specified criteria, including that it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the above-described provisions. (Based on 02/18/2025 text)
-
CJD
2nd House
______,Cll·---< •>----< >--< >----< •>----< >--< >----< •>----< >--< >----< l Des~ Policy Fisc~I Floor ConfConc Enrollllld Vetoed Cl'1!1pte1ed Location: 02/26/2025 - Senate TRANS.
Introduced: 02/18/2025
Current Text: 02/18/2025 - Introduced
SB 671 Cervantes (D) HTML PDF
Pedestrian crossing signals.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/05/2025 - Referred to Com. on TRANS.
Summary: Under current law, a pedestrian control signal showing a “WALK” or approved “Walking Person” symbol means a pedestrian may proceed across the roadway in the direction of the signal. Under current law, a pedestrian facing a
flashing “DON’T WALK” or “WAIT” or approved
“Upraised Hand” symbol with a “countdown” signal, as specified, means a pedestrian may start crossing the roadway in the direction of the signal but requires the pedestrian to finish crossing prior to the display of the steady “DON’T WALK” or “WAIT” or approved “Upraised Hand” symbol, as specified. Upon the first placement or replacement of a traffic-actuated signal, as specified, existing law requires that traffic-actuated signal to be installed and maintained to detect bicycle or motorcycle traffic on the roadway. For these purposes, current law defines a traffic-actuated signal as an official traffic signal, as specified, that displays one or more of its indications in response to traffic detected by mechanical, visual, electrical, or other means.
Upon the first placement or replacement of a state-owned or -operated traffic-actuated signal, existing law requires that the traffic-actuated signal to be installed and maintained to have a leading pedestrian interval (LPI) and include the installation, activation, and maintenance of an accessible pedestrian signal (APS) and detector that complies with certain sections of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). At crosswalks with state- owned or -operated traffic-actuated signals and pedestrian hybrid beacons with pedestrian signal heads, this bill would require the walk indication and other visual signals to comply with CA MUTCD. The bill would require these pedestrian signal heads to have an APS pushbutton or touch-
free APS that activates “WALK” or “DON’T WALK” intervals and other visual signals at signalized intersections in nonvisual formats. The bill would require touch-free APS to be installed at new signalized pedestrian crossings on capital projects on the state highway system, encroachment projects, and highway maintenance-funded projects, as specified. The bill would require, as soon as practicable, all existing state-owned or -operated traffic signals located in certain areas to be identified and recorded in the Department of Transportation management system (TMS) inventory database to assist future annual operational review requirements and coordination with local agencies for delegated signals. (Based on 02/20/2025 text)
Location: 03/05/2025 - Senate TRANS.
Introduced: 02/20/2025
Current Text: 02/20/2025 - Introduced
SB 720 Ashby (D) HTML PDF
Automated traffic enforcement system programs.
Progress bar
Bill information
--c::J □
.........«u •--< >--<--l r---< >--<--l r---< >--<--l r---< > Desk Pol icy Fiscal Fl00< Desk Pal,,:-y Fiscal Floor Cont.Cone. Enrolled ~oed O\liptercd -
c::JD
2ndHOl.lse
........,
Desk Pol1ey Fiscal Floor Conf.Conc Enrolllld ~oed Chop~cd Status: 03/26/2025 - From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended.
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
Summary: Current law authorizes the limit line, intersection, or other places where a driver is required to stop to be equipped with an automated traffic enforcement system if the governmental agency utilizing the system meets certain requirements, including identi fying the system with signs and
ensuring that the system meets specified criteria on minimum yellow light change intervals.
Current law authorizes, until January 1, 2032, the Cities of Los Angeles, San Jose, Oakland, Glendale, and Long Beach, and the City and County of San Francisco to establish a speed safety system pilot program for speed enforcement that utilizes a speed safety system in specified areas, if the system meets specified requirements. Current law prescribes specified requirements for a notice of violation issued pursuant to these provisions, and requires a violation of a speed law that is recorded by a speed safety system to be subject only to a specified civil penalty. This bill would additionally authorize a city, county, or city and county to establish an automated traffic enforcement system program to use those systems to detect a violation of a traffic control signal, if the system meets specified requirements. The bill would require a violation of a traffic control signal that is recorded by an automated traffic enforcement system to be subject only to a $100 civil penalty, as specified. (Based on 03/26/2025 text)
Location: 03/12/2025 - Senate TRANS.
Introduced: 02/21/2025
Current Text: 03/26/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/26/2025
Water Supply and Conservation LAP
AB 794 Gabriel (D) HTML PDF
California Safe Drinking Water Act: emergency regulations.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/03/2025 - Referred to Com. on E.S & T.M.
Summary: The California Safe Drinking Water Act requires the State Water Resources Control Board to administer provisions relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health. The state board’s duties include, but are not limited to, enforcing the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (federal act) and adopting and enforcing regulations. Current law authorizes the state board to adopt as an emergency regulation, a regulation that is not more stringent than, and is not materially different in substance and effect than, the requirements of a regulation promulgated under the federal act, with a specified exception. This bill would provide that the authority of the state board to adopt an emergency regulation pursuant to these provisions includes the authority to adopt requirements of a specified federal regulation that was in effect on January 19, 2025, regardless of whether the requirements were repealed or amended to be less stringent. The bill would prohibit an emergency regulation adopted pursuant to these provisions from implementing less stringent drinking water standards, as provided, and would authorize the regulation to include requirements that are more stringent than the requirements of the federal regulation. (Based on 02/18/2025 text)
Location: 03/03/2025 - Assembly E.S. &
T.M.
Introduced: 02/18/2025
Current Text: 02/18/2025 - Introduced
-
c::J D
2ndHOl.lse
.__,D ---0---0·--< }---{ J---< :>---<>---<>---< >---<: }--( J Desi( Polocy Fisc~I Floor Conf.Conc Enrolll!ld Vetoed Choptered SB 454 McNerney (D) HTML PDF
State Water Resources Control Board: PFAS Mitigation Program.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/24/2025 - From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended.
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
Summary: Existing law designates the State Water Resources Control Board as the agency responsible for administering specific programs related to drinking water, including, among others, the California Safe Drinking Water Act and the Emerging Contaminants for Small or Disadvantaged Communities Funding Program. This bill would create the PFAS Mitigation Fund in the State Treasury and would authorize the fund to be expended by the state board, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of these provisions. The bill would authorize the state board to seek out and accept nonstate, federal, and private funds, require those funds to be deposited into the PFAS Reduction Account within the PFAS Mitigation Fund, and continuously appropriate the moneys in the account to the state board for purposes of these provisions, thereby making an appropriation. (Based on 03/24/2025 text) Location: 02/26/2025 - Senate E.Q.
Introduced: 02/19/2025
Current Text: 03/24/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/24/2025
Cal Cities Sponsored Legislation
AB 424 Davies (R) HTML PDF
Alcohol and other drug programs: complaints.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/20/2025 - Re-referred to Com. on Health.
Summary: Would, when the Department of Health Care Services receives a complaint against a licensed alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facility, or a complaint alleging that a facility is unlawfully operating without a license, from a member of the public, require the department to provide, within 30 10 days of the date of the complaint, notice to the person filing the complaint that the complaint has been received and to provide, upon closing the complaint, notice to the person filing the complaint that the complaint has been closed and whether the department found the facility to be in violation of the provisions governing facility licensure and regulation. (Based on 03/19/2025 text)
Location: 02/18/2025 - Assembly HEALTH
Introduced: 02/05/2025
Current Text: 03/19/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/19/2025
AB 492 Valencia (D) HTML PDF
Alcohol and drug programs: licensing.
Progress bar
-
CJD
....._., o ---o---o---o--u--c>---<.>---{.J---{ }----4_}--lJ Orik Polley Fisal FIOOf Desk Policy Fi:1,eal Floor ConfConc. Enrolled ~oed Chapt~red -- CJ □
2ndHOl.lse
.........,
-
CJD
Bill information
Status: 02/24/2025 - Referred to Com. on Health.
Summary: Current law authorizes the State Department of Health Care Services to issue a license to operate an alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facility upon receipt of a completed written application, fire clearance, and licensing fee, as specified. This bill would require the department, whenever it issues a license to operate an alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facility, to concurrently provide written notification of the issuance of the license to the city or county in which the facility is located. The bill would require the notice to include the name and mailing address of the licensee and the location of the facility. (Based on 02/10/2025
text)
Location: 02/24/2025 - Assembly HEALTH
Introduced: 02/10/2025
Current Text: 02/10/2025 - Introduced
SB 35 Umberg (D) HTML PDF
Alcohol and drug programs.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/28/2025 - Set for hearing April 9.
Summary: Current law provides for the licensure and regulation of adult alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facilities by the State Department of Public Health and prohibits the operation of one of those facilities without a current valid license. Current law requires the department, if a facility is alleged to be in violation of that prohibition, to conduct a site visit to investigate the allegation. Current law requires, if the department’s employee or agent finds evidence that the facility is providing services without a license, the employee or agent to take specified actions, including, among others, submitting the findings of the investigation to the department and issuing a written notice to the facility that includes the date by which the facility is required to cease providing services. This bill would require the department to initiate that investigation within 10 days of receiving the allegation and complete the investigation within 60 days of initiating the investigation. The bill would require the employee or agent to provide the notice described above within 10 days of the employee or agency submitting their findings to the department and to conduct a followup site visit to determine whether the facility has ceased providing services by the date specified in the notice. (Based on 03/10/2025 text) Location: 03/19/2025 - Senate HEALTH
Introduced: 12/03/2024
Current Text: 03/10/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/10/2025
SB 329 Blakespear (D) HTML PDF
Alcohol and drug recovery or treatment facilities: investigations.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/28/2025 - Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. 2ndHOl.lse
•--{
--CJ □
2nd HOl.lse
~D---0---0·--< }--{ J--<:>---<}--{}---{ }---(: }--[ J
Dc,s.k; P~lic;y Fi5c1'1 Floo< Desio; PIJl,cy Fisc1'1 Floor ConfConc Enrolled ~ocd Chopte,icd -
CJD
2nd HOl.lse
• • Des.lo:; Policy ll'in:ii l Floo< Desk; PIJl,cy Fisc1'1 Floor ConfConc Enrolled ~ocd Chopteicd Summary: Current law provides for the licensure and regulation of alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facilities by the State Department of Health Care Services. Current law prohibits operating an alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facility to provide recovery, treatment, or detoxification services within this state without first obtaining a current valid license. If a facility is alleged to be providing those services without a license, existing law requires the department to conduct a site visit to investigate the allegation. Current law also authorizes the department to conduct announced or unannounced site visits to licensed facilities for the purpose of reviewing them for compliance, as specified. This bill would require the department to assign a complaint under its jurisdiction regarding an alcohol or other drug recovery or treatment facility to an analyst for investigation within 10 days of receiving the complaint. If the department receives a complaint that does not fall under its jurisdiction, the bill would require the department to notify the complainant, in writing, that it does not investigate that type of complaint. (Based on 03/28/2025 text)
Location: 03/26/2025 - Senate APPR.
Introduced: 02/11/2025
Current Text: 03/28/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/28/2025
SB 346 Durazo (D) HTML PDF
Local agencies: transient occupancy taxes: short-term rental facilitator.
Progress bar
Bill information
Status: 03/20/2025 - Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
Summary: Current law authorizes a local authority, by ordinance or resolution, to regulate the occupancy of a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, or other lodging for a period of less than 30 days. This bill would authorize a local agency, defined to mean a city, county, or city and county, to enact an ordinance to require a short-term rental facilitator, as defined, to report, in the form and manner prescribed by the local agency, the assessor parcel number of each short-term rental, as defined, during the reporting period, as well as any additional information necessary to identify the property as may be required by the local agency. The bill would authorize the local agency to impose an administrative fine or penalty for failure to file the report, and would authorize the local agency to initiate an audit of a short-term rental facilitator, as described. The bill would require a short-term rental facilitator, in a jurisdiction that has adopted an ordinance, to include in the listing of a short-term rental any applicable local license number associated with the short-term rental and any transient occupancy tax certification issued by a local agency. (Based on 03/20/2025 text) Location: 03/19/2025 - Senate JUD.
Introduced: 02/12/2025
Current Text: 03/20/2025 - Amended
Last Amend: 03/20/2025
--c::J □
2nd House
~ u,,---<>--< >----<>--< >----<>--[ >----<J-----,[ >---< .J-----,. J
2025 Q1 Legislative Action Summary
Below is a summary of the actions that were taken during 2025 Q1 in alignment with the City of Santa Clara’s 2025 Legislative Advocacy Positions (LAPs), guiding principles for legislative advocacy, approved City policies (e.g., City Council Goals and Priorities), and/or Council action.
Housing LAP
• March 28, 2025 Letter of interest in response to Santa Clara Valley Water District Board’s letter dated February 28, 2025 to explore the potential formation of a county-wide Joint Powers Authority to address homelessness
Transportation Issues LAP
• November 5, 2024 Letter of Support submitted for the City’s grant application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transit Oriented Communities Station Access and Circulation Grant for the Santa Clara Caltrain/BART Station Multimodal Crossing Feasibility Study (This letter was not previously included in the 2024 Q3 legislative update due to timing of the report.)
• March 26, 2025 Letter of support for the City’s Federal Appropriations Requests to Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff
Water Supply and Conservation LAP
• March 27, 2025 Letter of support for Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Fiscal Year 2026 Congressionally Directed Spending Request for its Purified Water Demonstration Facility submitted to the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations Chair, Senator Susan Collins and Vice Chair, Senator Patty Murray
Multiple Legislative Priorities
• February 21, 2025 Letter of support for the City’s State Budget Requests to Assemblymember Patrick Ahrens (Housing, and Transportation Issues LAPs)
City of
Santa Clara
The Center of What's Possible
• March 31, 2025 Sign on U.S. Conference of Mayors joint letter outlining municipalities’ priorities for the 2025 Tax Reform and Reconciliation Bill submitted to U.S. Congressional leadership: Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson, Minority Leader of the House of Representatives Hakeem Jefferies, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, and Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (Housing, Community Services, and Energy Legislation, Regulations and Issues LAPs and "Protect and/or increase funding for specific programs and services" Legislative Guiding Principle)
1500 Warburton Avenue ● Santa Clara, CA 95050 ● Phone: 408-615-2200 ● Fax: 408-241-6771 ● SantaClaraCA.gov Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
March 28, 2025
Vice Chair Richard P. Santos
Board of Directors
Santa Clara Valley Water District
5750 Almaden Expressway
San Jose, CA 95118
RE: Potential Formation of a County-wide Joint Powers Authority
Dear Vice Chair Santos:
On behalf of the City of Santa Clara, I would like to express our interest in exploring the potential formation of a county-wide Joint Powers Authority (JPA) to address unsheltered homelessness in our community.
The City of Santa Clara is actively working on a number of efforts to increase affordable housing in our community and provide additional services to our unhoused community members; however, like many other jurisdictions in our region, we have limited resources to effectively address this increasingly visible, urgent, and complex issue on our own.
We recognize the benefits that a collaborative arrangement and coordinated county-wide response could bring to our community, particularly in terms of resource sharing, enhanced service delivery, and improved regional coordination when it comes to homelessness. The City is supportive of more regional resources to address local housing needs, and efforts that provide increased access to resources to address the needs of our most vulnerable residents and resources for small and medium sized cities to plan and implement strategies to address the impacts of homelessness on public facilities and services.
The City has and will continue to work closely with other jurisdictions, including Valley Water, to address regional issues, such as homelessness, that impact residents and businesses in our community.
It is also important to recognize that the formation of a JPA will require significant review and efforts from all interested parties. There are obligations and operational complexities inherent to forming and operating a JPA such as governance structure, financial and liability implications, and logistical considerations. While the City is optimistic about the potential benefits of a county-wide JPA that maximizes our collective impact, it is imperative that these issues are adequately addressed to ensure the interests of all potential participating agencies.
We appreciate the opportunity to meet with Valley Water and other local jurisdictions to continue the discussion of these issues in greater detail and to explore potential solutions that would allow for a successful and sustainable partnership that achieves our shared goals.
Sincerely,
Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
City of Santa Clara
City of
Santa Clara
The Center of Wh~t's Possible
1500 Warburton Avenue ● Santa Clara, CA 95050 ● Phone: 408-615-2200 ● Fax: 408-241-6771 ● SantaClaraCA.gov Mayor
Lisa M. Gillmor
November 5, 2024
Krute Singa
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
375 Beale Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105-2066
Re: Letter of Support for the City of Santa Clara Grant Application to MTC Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Station Access and Circulation Grant for the Santa Clara Caltrain/BART Station Multimodal Crossing Feasibility Study
Dear Krute Singa:
I write in support of the City of Santa Clara’s grant application to Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)’s Transit-Oriented Communities – Station Access and Circulation Grant for the Santa Clara Caltrain/BART Station Multimodal Crossing Feasibility Study (Project). The Project represents a historic opportunity to revitalize and reconnect the Santa Clara downtown area with nearby communities and economic development opportunities around the existing Caltrain station and the future Santa Clara Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station. These two stations will provide regional access to thousands of jobs, and significant existing and proposed housing, hotels, and schools (such as Santa Clara University) in Silicon Valley.
The City of Santa Clara worked in close partnership with key community stakeholders to develop the Project which will create roadway design concepts, identify potential impacts to adjacent properties, study traffic operations, conduct robust community engagement, and evaluate the feasibility of constructing a direct multi-modal connection between Benton Street and Brokaw Road. Historically, the existing Caltrain station and tracks near Benton Street in Santa Clara has divided an economically important part of Santa Clara and continues to be a significant physical barrier to downtown access for all users including the disadvantaged community located in the study area.
This crossing will allow pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders to efficiently travel to and through the station area with potential access to San José Mineta International Airport, thus significantly reducing travel times and vehicle trips for Peninsula train riders and the general local community.
Additionally, this crossing will attract more people to use transit, improve accessibility and safety of all transportation modes, and support future transit -oriented development next to the Santa Clara BART station. Additionally, the Project promotes active transportation and transit, reduction of daily vehicle-miles traveled, greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle congestion, and increases equity and access to historically disadvantaged communities.
Thank you for your consideration of the City of Santa Clara’s grant application, and I urge your support for this priority project that will greatly benefit the Santa Clara community.
Sincerely,
Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
City of Santa Clara
City of
Santa Clara
The Center of Wh~t's Posslblo
1500 Warburton Avenue ● Santa Clara, CA 95050 ● Phone: 408-615-2200 ● Fax: 408-241-6771 ● SantaClaraCA.gov Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
March 26, 2025
The Honorable Alex Padilla
United States Senate
331 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
The Honorable Adam Schiff
United States Senate
112 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
RE: Letter of Support for Fiscal Year 2026 Congressionally Directed Spending Requests from the City of Santa Clara
Dear Senator Padilla and Senator Schiff:
On behalf of the City of Santa Clara, I want to express my gratitude and appreciation to both of you, and your staff, for your leadership and support. We appreciate the opportunity to work with your offices to bring investments and improvements to the residents, businesses, and visitors of our region.
I also want to highlight the City of Santa Clara’s requests for congressionally directed spending in the Fiscal Year 2026 Federal Appropriations process and respectfully request your support. Our projects specifically seek to facilitate the development of regional community assets, increase opportunities for alternative modes of transportation, and create safe streets for bicyclists and pedestrians.
The City’s priority projects are:
• Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Project
The City of Santa Clara adopted the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan in 2022 to implement buffered bicycle lanes along the Pruneridge Avenue corridor in Santa Clara.
This east-west roadway is an important part of the County of Santa Clara’s cross- county bicycle corridor network and connects San Jose to Santa Clara and job centers in Cupertino. The project will remove portions of travel lanes along Pruneridge Avenue to complete this important cross-county bicycle network and enhance intersections along the corridor with pedestrian improvements such as quick -build curb extensions, A DA curb ramps, and pedestrian signal enhancements. When complete, Pruneridge Avenue will connect to jobs, schools, transit, and trails and provide direct access to the region’s first under-development bicycle superhighway. The requested funding will support the City’s design and construction of this priority bicycle and pedestrian improvement project in Santa Clara.
City of
Santa Clara
The Cent er of What'a Po$Slblr
Senator Alex Padilla
Senator Adam Schiff
Re: Fiscal Year 2026 Congressionally Directed Spending Requests from the City of Santa Clara March 26, 2025
• Silicon Valley Hopper On-Demand Micro-transit Shuttle The City of Santa Clara has partnered with the City of Cupertino to implement an on - demand micro-transit shuttle project, known as Silicon Valley Hopper, to serve those who live and work in Cupertino and Santa Clara. With support from a California State Transportation Agency State Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program grant, the goal is to continue the existing On-Demand Micro-Transit Shuttle Project and expand service into north Santa Clara with a fleet of zero- emissions vehicles. Service is being designed to focus on offering improved and affordable connections between local Caltrain, Amtrak, and Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) stations to job centers and other key destinations in Cupertino and Santa Clara while providing increased transit access for disadvantaged communities, high poverty zones, and senior populations.
Thank you for your consideration in championing these projects to help secure congressionally directed spending that will support the efforts of the City and benefit the region and State of California.
Sincerely,
Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
City of Santa Clara
1500 Warburton Avenue ● Santa Clara, CA 95050 ● Phone: 408-615-2200 ● Fax: 408-241-6771 ● SantaClaraCA.gov Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
March 27, 2025
The Honorable Susan Collins
Chair, Committee on Appropriations
United States Senate
Room S-128, The Capitol
Washington, DC 20510
The Honorable Patty Murray
Vice Chair, Committee on Appropriations
United States Senate
Room S-128, The Capitol
Washington, DC 20510
RE: Support for FY26 Congressionally Directed Spending Request – Purified Water Demonstration Facility
Dear Chair Collins and Vice Chair Murray:
On behalf of the City of Santa Clara, California, I am pleased to submit this letter of support for the Santa Clara Valley Water District’s (Valley Water) Fiscal Year 2026 Congressionally Directed Spending Request for its Purified Water Demonstration Facility.
Valley Water has a long- term goal of producing up to 24,000 acre- feet per year of purified water for direct potable reuse by the year 2040. Developing a locally controlled, reliable, and drought resilient water supply is critical in the face of climate change. Cyclical climate changes and dry conditions have placed enormous strain on existing sources, such as imported water from the Sacramento- San Joaquin River Delta and stored local water supplies. Santa Clara County faces additional water supply challenges driven by a growing population and economy. The City of Santa Clara shares a commitment to diversifying the regional water supply portfolio as way to move the region towards a more sustainable and resilient future.
This project, a joint effort between Valley Water and the Cities of Santa Clara and San José, is the first phase of a full-scale facility to provide purified water for direct potable reuse in Santa Clara County, the heart of Silicon Valley. Until recently, California communities could use recycled water for drinking only if that water was first filtered through a reservoir or aquifer. State regulations adopted in 2023, however, will allow suppliers to distribute recycled water without first putting the water into a reservoir or aquifer. As Valley Water studies the potential for a full-scale potable reuse facility in the future, it must first prove the project’s feasibility. This funding request would help support the design work for this first-phase demonstration facility.
On behalf of the City of Santa Clara, I urge your support for this important drought resilienc y project. Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
City of Santa Clara
City of
Santa Clara
The Center of Wh~t's Possible
1500 Warburton Avenue ● Santa Clara, CA 95050 ● Phone: 408-615-2200 ● Fax: 408-241-6771 ● SantaClaraCA.gov Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
February 21, 2025
Honorable Patrick Ahrens
California State Assembly, 26
th District
1021 O Street, Suite 6110
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: 2025 State Budget Requests from the City of Santa Clara
Dear Assembly Member Ahrens:
On behalf of the City of Santa Clara, I want to express my appreciation to you and your staff for your support and commitment to the priorities of the city. I look forward to a long, and successful, working relationship between you, your office, and the City to improve the lives of the residents, businesses, and visitors to our great city.
As the State Legislature continues the process of shaping the state budget and evaluating where the state’s resources are best invested, I understand things are uncertain at best. If the opportunity arises for district requests to be included in the Legislature’s budget, I would like to respectfully present a list of priority funding needs for the City and request your partnership to help secure these critical dollars.
Below are the City’s priority projects for consideration, along with a brief description and dollar amount. Recognizing the state’s fiscal situation, t he City has selected projects that will have significant local and regional impacts, thereby maximizing the return on the state’s investment.
The City and our legislative advocate are happy to provide more in- depth details and discuss each of these projects further.
I am proud that our values and priorities align and look forward to our continued partnership to serve the Santa Clara community. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to continuing our work together.
Sinc
erely,
Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor
City of Santa Clara
City of
Santa Clara
The Cent er of What'a Po$Slblr
Assembly Member Patrick Ahrens
Re: 2025 State Budget Requests from the City of Santa Clara February 21, 2025
Title: City of Santa Clara Oversized Vehicle Parking Program
Amount: $1,600,000
Description: As housing prices and costs of living continue to rise in Silicon Valley, the number of people living in oversized vehicles parked on City streets without utility and sanitation hookups has also increased . The City’s Police Department estimates there are over 100 inhabited oversized vehicles in Santa Clara on any given day and many of them are inoperable. There is a need to expand current City resources to address the basi c needs of people living outside and reduce the impacts of unsheltered homelessness throughout the community.
This proposal would fund a sanctioned safe parking pilot program for approximately 30- 40 oversized vehicles over 2-3 years. The program would allow 24-7 parking, provide basic hygiene services, daily monitoring for security, and case management to connect residents with services so they can transition to permanent housing. The program would be administered in close coordination with the Santa Clara County Office of Supportive Housing. The City will also explore partnerships with neighboring cities to identify possible sites and to potentially pool resources.
Title: Pruneridge Avenue Complete Street
Amount: $2,500,000
Description: In 2022, the City of Santa Clara adopted the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan to implement buffered bicycle lanes along the Pruneridge Avenue corridor. This east -west roadway is a crucial part of the County of Santa Clara's cross -county bicycle corridor network, connecting San Jose, Santa Clara, and the Apple campus in Cupertino.
The project involves removing portions of travel lanes along Pruneridge Avenue to complete this important bicycle network and enhance intersections with pedestrian improvements. These enhancements will include quick -build curb extensions, ADA- compliant curb ramps, and upgraded pedestrian signals. Funding is being requested to support the design and construction of this priority project for bicycle and pedestrian improvements in Santa Clara. This project is vital to the City, Silicon Valley region, and the state because it aims to increase pedestrian safety, promote alternative modes of transportation, and connect schools and employment centers to and from the region.
The intersections of Pruneridge Avenue at Woodhams Road and Redwood Avenue are near an elementary school and are frequently used by students crossing Pruneridge Avenue. These locations have been identified in the City of Santa Clara’s Pedestrian Master Plan as needing improvements for pedestrian safety. Bicyclists, including students, currently use the portion of Pruneridge Avenue where no bicycle facility currently exists. Bicyclists using this corridor need to navigate between parked vehicles and vehicles traveling with a posted speed limit of 35 mph.
Students from two elementary schools located adjacent to this roadway also use this portion of Pruneridge Avenue. This project will provide Class II buffered bikeway that connects to 14 schools with a total enrollment of 8,896 students and over 12,500 employees from job centers along the project corridor.
Assembly Member Patrick Ahrens
Re: 2025 State Budget Requests from the City of Santa Clara February 21, 2025
Title: Santa Clara Caltrain Station Crossing Feasibility Study
Amount: $500,000
Description: The Santa Clara Caltrain Station Crossing Feasibility Study will develop roadway design concepts, assess potential impacts on nearby properties, analyze traffic operations, engage with the community, and evaluate the feasibility of establishing a direct multi- modal connection between Benton Street and Brokaw Road. This connection will be located near the existing Santa Clara Caltrain station, which is separated by heavy rail tracks.
This connection was lost during the 1960s due to urban renewal policies that led to the demolition of Santa Clara’s downtown and disrupted important transit links. Today, this disconnection presents a physical barrier between residential neighborhoods, mixed-use areas, and commercial hubs, isolating communities from economic opportunities, essential services, and regional transit options such as the Santa Clara Caltrain Station and the upcoming Santa Clara Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station.
The goal of the project is to reconnect disadvantaged communities with nearby economic opportunities, improve access to essential services, reduce environmental burdens, and foster a vibrant, interconnected community. A key aspect of the plan is the potential creation of a new multimodal connection linking downtown Santa Clara, Santa Clara University, the Coleman Avenue employment hubs, PayPal Park Soccer Stadium, Caltrain Station, and San Jose Mineta International Airport with the future Santa Clara BART station.
March 31, 2025
The Honorable Mike Johnson The Honorable John Thune
Speaker Majority Leader
United States House of Representatives (LA) United States Senate (SD)
The Honorable Hakeem Jeffries The Honorable Charles E. Schumer Democratic Leader Democratic Leader
United States House of Representatives (NY) United States Senate (NY)
Dear Speaker Johnson, Leader Thune, Leader Jeffries and Leader Schumer:
As the nation’s mayors, we write to express the opportunities we see in the upcoming re-write of the 2017 tax law; and other components of the reconciliation bill.
At the outset, the tax bill should continue to build upon bipartisan proposals that advance the federal-city partnership that has yielded strong economic growth over the decades. US Metro cities and suburbs now are home to over 90% of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP); 88% of its jobs; 93% of economic growth; and 76% of job growth in 2024. Our metro economies provide the infrastructure and ecosystem for our nation’s future economic growth.
Through our partnership with the federal government, cities have worked to create opportunity for all our residents and to attract economic development benefiting both urban and suburban communities.
We, therefore, support the following provisions in the reconciliation bill which we believe will strengthen America and address critical national needs.
1. Provide major housing tax credits to spur production including a robust expansion of the Low- Income Housing Tax Credit, creation of the Neighborhood Homes Tax Credit, tax credits to convert vacant commercial property to housing, and expansion of the Historic Tax Credit.
Research shows significant increases in housing production directly correlate to reduced rents and the moderation of housing prices, exactly what is needed to address our national housing crisis. But these credits must spur sufficient production to adequately respond to the depth and breadth of our nation’s shortage of units, which we estimate to be between 4-7 million. Given the role that rising home prices and rents play in “kitchen table” inflation, we believe the production credits should be a top priority in the tax bill.
2. Provide full funding of the Community Development Block Grant (housing rehab) and HOME Partnership (new construction) programs, along with increased resources for FHA mortgage insurance, rental assistance, and affordable housing programs to further address our housing crisis.
THE UNITED STATES
CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
Mayors' Priorities for Reconciliation/Tax Bill
March 31, 2025
3. Protect tax exempt municipal bonds, including private activity bonds, which are the main financing tool of locally funded, essential infrastructure, including transportation, water and wastewater facilities, along with housing, schools, and hospitals, to name a few. We oppose any effort to restrict this time-honored mechanism for raising local revenues to support locally driven projects. State and local governments finance 75% of the nation’s infrastructure, mostly through tax exempt financing. Removing the tax exemption on municipal bonds would cost households on average $6,500 over a ten-year period.
4. Continue innovative Direct Pay energy credits within the IRS to support local government energy efficiency and conservation projects to lower energy bills. Federal investment credits and direct pay policies provide a critical incentive for leveraging investments in new and upgraded energy sources. Direct pay policies also enhance local efforts to modernize the electricity transmission grid and ensure that electricity transformers are available.
5. Restore and Expand the Child Tax Credit, proven to reduce child poverty in our nation. In fact, CTC levels during our economic recovery reduced child poverty by 40%. This bill should do the same. An economically stable and secure family enriches early childhood development and emotional health; poverty yields the opposite. Expanding the CTC is an investment in the future of our children’s lives and our nation.
6. Protect Medicaid benefits to ensure current levels of service and access to health care.
Medicaid is the principal source of health care funding for countless seniors in nursing homes in cities and rural America alike; and is a major source of health care for the nation’s children. We also want to emphasize the importance of maintaining the funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and other child nutrition programs, as they are vital for supporting child health.
The reconciliation package provides Congress the opportunity to solve the nation’s housing crisis, protect tax exempt financing, fund essential community development and housing assistance programs, significantly reduce child poverty, and protect health care for the poor.
We look forward to working with you to fashion key components of the tax and reconciliation bill that impact the American people’s daily lives and to address their most urgent needs.
Sincerely,
Andrew J. Ginther David Holt Todd Gloria Tom Cochran Mayor of Columbus, OH Mayor of Oklahoma City, OK Mayor of San Diego, CA CEO & Executive Director President Vice President Second Vice President
(Additional mayoral signatories are listed on the following pages.) 1620 I Street, NW, Washington , D.C. 20006 202.293.7330 usmayors.org @us mayors
Steven Reed
Mayor of Montgomery, AL
Frank D. Scott Jr.
Mayor of Little Rock, AR
Regina Romero
Mayor of Tucson, AZ
Corey Woods
Mayor of Tempe, AZ
Becky Daggett
Mayor of Flagstaff, AZ
Jerry Weiers
Mayor of Glendale, AZ
Kate Gallego
Mayor of Phoenix, AZ
Douglas J. Nicholls
Mayor of Yuma, AZ
Mark Freeman
Mayor of Mesa, AZ
Mike Pineda
Mayor of Avondale, AZ
Martha Guerrero
Mayor of West Sacramento,
CA
Patricia Lock Dawson
Mayor of Riverside, CA
Chelsea Lee Byers
Mayor of West Hollywood, CA
Matt Mahan
Mayor of San Jose, CA
Juan Gonzalez
Mayor of San Leandro, CA
Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft
Mayor of Alameda, CA
Paul Akinjo
Mayor of Lathrop, CA
Lester J. Friedman
Mayor of Beverly Hills, CA
Kevin McDonnell
Mayor of Petaluma, CA
Carmen Montano
Mayor of Milpitas, CA
Helen Tran
Mayor of San Bernardino, CA
Siri Pulipati
Mayor of Rancho Cordova, CA
Lula Davis-Holmes
Mayor of Carson, CA
Acquanetta Warren
Mayor of Fontana, CA
Victor Gordo
Mayor of Pasadena, CA
Michael M. Vargas
Mayor of Perris, CA
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor of Santa Ana, CA
Karen Bass
Mayor of Los Angeles, CA
Jerry Dyer
Mayor of Fresno, CA
Karen K. Goh
Mayor of Bakersfield, CA
Daniel Lurie
Mayor of San Francisco, CA
Todd Rogers
Mayor of Lakewood, CA
Kevin McCarty
Mayor of Sacramento, CA
Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayor of Santa Clara, CA
Ian N. Oglesby
Mayor of Seaside, CA
Ashleigh Aitken
Mayor of Anaheim, CA
Mark Stapp
Mayor of Santa Rosa, CA
Dan O'Brien
Mayor of Culver City, CA
Rex Richardson
Mayor of Long Beach, CA
Joyce Ahn
Mayor of Buena Park, CA
Ellen Kamei
Mayor of Mountain View, CA
Steven Douglas
Mayor of Commerce City, CO
THE UNITED STATES
CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
Mayors' Priorities for Reconciliation/Tax Bill
March 31, 2025
Yemi Mobolade
Mayor of Colorado Springs,
CO
Wendi Strom
Mayor of Lakewood, CO
Kyle Schlachter
Mayor of Littleton, CO
Mike Johnston
Mayor of Denver, CO
Joe Ganim
Mayor of Bridgeport, CT
Shari Cantor
Mayor of West Hartford, CT
Roberto Alves
Mayor of Danbury, CT
Arunan Arulampalam
Mayor of Hartford, CT
Harry Rilling
Mayor of Norwalk, CT
Muriel Bowser
Mayor of Washington, DC
D.C. Reeves
Mayor of Pensacola, FL
Keith A. James
Mayor of West Palm Beach, FL
Rex Hardin
Mayor of Pompano Beach, FL
Michael Joseph Esq.
Mayor of North Miami Beach,
FL
Santiago Avila Jr.
Mayor of Deltona, FL
Alix Desulme
Mayor of North Miami, FL
Joy Cooper
Mayor of Hallandale Beach,
FL
Jane Castor
Mayor of Tampa, FL
Arlene R. Schwartz
Mayor of Margate, FL
Harvey Ward
Mayor of Gainesville, FL
Buddy Dyer
Mayor of Orlando, FL
Angelo Castillo
Mayor of Pembroke Pines, FL
Wayne M. Messam
Mayor of Miramar, FL
Scott Brook
Mayor of Coral Springs, FL
Tim Lonergan
Mayor of Oakland Park, FL
Donna Deegan
Mayor of Jacksonville, FL
Michelle J. Gomez
Mayor of Tamarac, FL
Vince R. Williams
Mayor of Union City, GA
Andre Dickens
Mayor of Atlanta, GA
Van R. Johnson II
Mayor of Savannah, GA
Michael Owens
Mayor of Mableton, GA
Quentin M. Hart
Mayor of Waterloo, IA
Connie Boesen
Mayor of Des Moines, IA
Brad M. Cavanagh
Mayor of Dubuque, IA
Lauren McLean
Mayor of Boise, ID
Chad Jason Ashmore
Mayor of Sesser, IL
Mary Alexander-Basta
Mayor of Bolingbrook, IL
Nancy Rodkin Rotering
Mayor of Highland Park, IL
Misty Buscher
Mayor of Springfield, IL
Chris Koos
Mayor of Normal, IL
John D. Noak
Mayor of Romeoville, IL
Rodney S. Craig
Mayor of Hanover Park, IL
1620 I Street, NW, Washington , D.C. 20006 202.293.7330 usmayors.org @us mayors Mayors' Priorities for Reconciliation/Tax Bill
March 31, 2025
William 'Bill' D. McLeod
Mayor of Hoffman Estates, IL
Rita Ali
Mayor of Peoria, IL
Diane W. Marlin
Mayor of Urbana, IL
Ann Taylor
Mayor of Waukegan, IL
Brandon Johnson
Mayor of Chicago, IL
James Mueller
Mayor of South Bend, IN
Sharon Tucker
Mayor of Fort Wayne, IN
Joseph 'Joe' H. Hogsett
Mayor of Indianapolis, IN
Angie Nelson Deuitch
Mayor of Michigan City, IN
Thomas Broderick Jr.
Mayor of Anderson, IN
Chris Jensen
Mayor of Noblesville, IN
Eddie Melton
Mayor of Gary, IN
Layne Wilkerson
Mayor of Frankfort, KY
Craig Greenberg
Mayor of Louisville, KY
LaToya Cantrell
Mayor of New Orleans, LA
Samantha Squailia
Mayor of Fitchburg, MA
John L. Vieau
Mayor of Chicopee, MA
Jon Mitchell
Mayor of New Bedford, MA
Dominick Pangallo
Mayor of Salem, MA
Robert F. Sullivan
Mayor of Brockton, MA
Domenic J. Sarno
Mayor of Springfield, MA
Katjana Ballantyne
Mayor of Somerville, MA
Michael P. Cahill
Mayor of Beverly, MA
E. Denise Simmons
Mayor of Cambridge, MA
Michael O'Connor
Mayor of Frederick, MD
Jud Ashman
Mayor of Gaithersburg, MD
Jeffrey Z. Slavin
Mayor of Somerset, MD
Gavin Buckley
Mayor of Annapolis, MD
Brandon M Scott
Mayor of Baltimore, MD
Mark Dion
Mayor of Portland, ME
Marcus Muhammad
Mayor of Benton Harbor, MI
Andy Schor
Mayor of Lansing, MI
Anne Marie Graham-Hudak
Mayor of Charter Township of
Canton, MI
Bryan K. Barnett
Mayor of Rochester Hills, MI
Abdullah Hammoud
Mayor of Dearborn, MI
Chris Barnett
Mayor of Charter Township of
Orion, MI
Byron H. Nolen
Mayor of Inkster, MI
Theresa Rich
Mayor of Farmington Hills, MI
Patricia M. Randall
Mayor of Portage, MI
Mark Behnke
Mayor of Battle Creek, MI
Elizabeth B. Kautz
Mayor of Burnsville, MN
James B. Hovland
Mayor of Edina, MN
1620 I Street, NW, Washington , D.C. 20006 202.293.7330 usmayors.org @us mayors Mayors' Priorities for Reconciliation/Tax Bill
March 31, 2025
Kim Norton
Mayor of Rochester, MN
Mary Supple
Mayor of Richfield, MN
Melvin Carter
Mayor of St. Paul, MN
Ron Case
Mayor of Eden Prairie, MN
Tim Busse
Mayor of Bloomington, MN
Barbara Buffaloe
Mayor of Columbia, MO
Tishaura O. Jones
Mayor of St. Louis, MO
Quinton Lucas
Mayor of Kansas City, MO
Ramon RB Jose Blas
Camacho
Mayor of Saipan, MP
Chokwe Antar Lumumba Esq.
Mayor of Jackson, MS
Errick D. Simmons
Mayor of Greenville, MS
Dontario 'Don' Hardy
Mayor of Kinston, NC
Cyril Jefferson
Mayor of High Point, NC
Jessica Anderson
Mayor of Chapel Hill, NC
Vi Alexander Lyles
Mayor of Charlotte, NC
Esther E. Manheimer
Mayor of Asheville, NC
William 'Bill' C. Dusch
Mayor of Concord, NC
Mitch Colvin
Mayor of Fayetteville, NC
Tim Mahoney
Mayor of Fargo, ND
Leirion Gaylor Baird
Mayor of Lincoln, NE
Brian C. Wahler
Mayor of Piscataway, NJ
J. Christian Bollwage
Mayor of Elizabeth, NJ
Adrian O. Mapp
Mayor of Plainfield, NJ
Jeffrey S. Martin
Mayor of Hamilton Township,
NJ
Alan Webber
Mayor of Santa Fe, NM
Javier Perea
Mayor of Sunland Park, NM
Tim Keller
Mayor of Albuquerque, NM
Michelle Romero
Mayor of Henderson, NV
Hillary Schieve
Mayor of Reno, NV
Gary R. McCarthy
Mayor of Schenectady, NY
Kathy M. Sheehan
Mayor of Albany, NY
Thomas M. Roach
Mayor of White Plains, NY
Waylyn Hobbs Jr.
Mayor of Hempstead, NY
Shawyn Patterson-Howard
Mayor of Mount Vernon, NY
Malik Evans
Mayor of Rochester, NY
Kimberly Ecklund
Mayor of Jamestown, NY
Ben Walsh
Mayor of Syracuse, NY
Sharetta Smith
Mayor of Lima, OH
Justin Bibb
Mayor of Cleveland, OH
Kahlil Seren
Mayor of Cleveland Heights,
OH
Joe Begeny
Mayor of Reynoldsburg, OH
Kim Thomas
Mayor of Richmond Heights,
OH
1620 I Street, NW, Washington , D.C. 20006 202.293.7330 usmayors.org @us mayors Mayors' Priorities for Reconciliation/Tax Bill
March 31, 2025
Aftab Pureval
Mayor of Cincinnati, OH
Jack W. Bradley
Mayor of Lorain, OH
Christina Muryn
Mayor of Findlay, OH
Kevin Brubaker
Mayor of Elyria, OH
Wade Kapszukiewicz
Mayor of Toledo, OH
Shammas Malik
Mayor of Akron, OH
Steve Patterson
Mayor of Athens, OH
William 'Doug' Franklin
Mayor of Warren, OH
Jamael Tito Brown
Mayor of Youngstown, OH
Meghan F. George
Mayor of Lakewood, OH
Jeffrey J. Mims Jr.
Mayor of Dayton, OH
William H. Joyce
Mayor of Stillwater, OK
Heidi Lueb
Mayor of Tigard, OR
Lacey Beaty
Mayor of Beaverton, OR
Travis Stovall
Mayor of Gresham, OR
Melanie Kebler
Mayor of Bend, OR
Keith Wilson
Mayor of Portland, OR
Matt Tuerk
Mayor of Allentown, PA
Paige G. Cognetti
Mayor of Scranton, PA
Danene Sorace
Mayor of Lancaster, PA
Ed Gainey
Mayor of Pittsburgh, PA
Cherelle L. Parker
Mayor of Philadelphia, PA
Lornna J. Soto
Mayor of Canovanas, PR
Maria Rivera
Mayor of Central Falls, RI
Brett P. Smiley
Mayor of Providence, RI
Daniel Rickenmann
Mayor of Columbia, SC
Indya Kincannon
Mayor of Knoxville, TN
Freddie O'Connell
Mayor of Nashville, TN
Tim Kelly
Mayor of Chattanooga, TN
Jim Ross
Mayor of Arlington, TX
Ron Nirenberg
Mayor of San Antonio, TX
Mattie Parker
Mayor of Fort Worth, TX
Kirk Watson
Mayor of Austin, TX
Christopher Harvey
Mayor of Manor, TX
John Muns
Mayor of Plano, TX
Paulette M. Guajardo
Mayor of Corpus Christi, TX
John Whitmire
Mayor of Houston, TX
Thurman 'Bill' Bartie
Mayor of Port Arthur, TX
Erin J. Mendenhall
Mayor of Salt Lake City, UT
Michelle Davis-Younger
Mayor of Manassas, VA
Phillip Jones
Mayor of Newport News, VA
Nancy Backus
Mayor of Auburn, WA
1620 I Street, NW, Washington , D.C. 20006 202.293.7330 usmayors.org @us mayors Mayors' Priorities for Reconciliation/Tax Bill
March 31, 2025
Mary Lou Pauly
Mayor of Issaquah, WA
Angela Birney
Mayor of Redmond, WA
Cassie Franklin
Mayor of Everett, WA
Victoria Woodards
Mayor of Tacoma, WA
Dontae Payne
Mayor of Olympia, WA
Bruce Harrell
Mayor of Seattle, WA
Lisa Brown
Mayor of Spokane, WA
Eric Genrich
Mayor of Green Bay, WI
Satya Rhodes-Conway
Mayor of Madison, WI
Ryan Sorenson
Mayor of Sheboygan, WI
Cory Mason
Mayor of Racine, WI
Cavalier Johnson
Mayor of Milwaukee, WI
cc: The United States House of Representatives and United States Senate 1620 I Street, NW, Washington , D.C. 20006 202.293.7330 usmayors.org @us mayors City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
25-396 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
REPORT TO STADIUM AUTHORITY BOARD
SUBJECT
Action on Stadium Authority Bills and Claims for the Month of February 2025
BOARD PILLARS
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency
Ensure Compliance with Measure J and Manage Levi’s Stadium
BACKGROUND
Disbursements made by the Stadium Authority are based on invoices submitted for payment. Prior to payment, staff reviews all disbursement documents to ensure that the invoiced goods or services have been provided.
The Bills and Claims listing represents the cash disbursements required of normal and usual operations during February 2025. Budget control is set by the Stadium Authority Board through the budget adoption process.
DISCUSSION
At its March 12, 2024 meeting, the Stadium Authority Board adopted the Santa Clara Stadium Authority Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating, Debt Service, and Capital Budget which runs from April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025. Significant expenditures (greater than $5,000) paid in February 2025 include:
· Payments totaling $336,988.73 to the City of Santa Clara for the following:
o $228,895.53 for reimbursement of General and Administrative (G&A) City payroll costs (e.g., Executive Director’s Office (City Manager’s Office), Stadium Authority Counsel’s Office (City Attorney’s Office), and Treasurer’s Office (Finance Department)) o $108,093.20 for Senior/Youth Fees for NFL Games 8-10 and Year-End True-Up · Payment totaling $1,415,444.32 to Forty Niners Stadium Management Company, LLC for February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses, inclusive of Shared Stadium Expenses · Payment totaling $5,344.70 to InTWO, Inc for Financial Management System Monthly Services (January 2025)
· Payment totaling $55,819.15 to O.C. McDonald Co., Inc. for Capital Expenditure (CapEx) Project - Plumbing (Boilers)
Names of law firms have been redacted from the Bills and Claims report. The Supreme Court of California in Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court, (2016) 2 Cal.5th 282, held that invoices specifying the amounts billed by a law firm to a client fall within the scope of attorney- client privilege while the matters are active. In accordance with the Supreme Court’s ruling, the names of law firms retained by the Stadium Authority, and the specific amounts billed by each, have City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
25-396 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
been redacted from the public report to maintain the confidentiality of billing records for specific legal services. The aggregate amount spent on legal services in the subject time period has been provided.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to section 15378(b)(4) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations in that it is a fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potential significant impact on the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact to the Stadium Authority is $1,820,939.08
COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the Executive Director and Stadium Authority Counsel’s Office.
PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] or at the public information desk at any City of Santa Clara public library.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the list of Stadium Authority Bills and Claims for February 2025.
Reviewed by: Kenn Lee, Treasurer
Approved by: Jovan D. Grogan, Executive Director
ATTACHMENTS
1. February 2025 SCSA Bills and Claims
City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
Payment Date Vendor Invoice No. Description Fund Amount 2/21/2025 Armanino Solutions LLC CINV-1437874 Financial Management System - Annual Subscription for GP (2025) Operating 2,850.00$ 2/3/2025 City of Santa Clara N/A B2426 SCSA Payroll Costs Operating 99,877.52 2/4/2025 City of Santa Clara N/A B2501 SCSA Payroll Costs Operating 25,069.14 2/12/2025 City of Santa Clara N/A Senior/Youth Fees for NFL Games 8-10 and Year-End True-Up Operating 108,093.20 2/18/2025 City of Santa Clara N/A B2502 SCSA Payroll Costs Operating 103,948.87 336,988.73
2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - Security Operating 133,473.00 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - Stadium Ops Operating 281,995.00 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - Engineering Operating 327,933.00 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - Guest Services Operating 51,714.00 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - Groundskeeping Operating 26,374.00 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - SBL Sales & Service Operating 203,970.46 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - Insurance Operating 77,318.31 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - Utilities Operating 247,980.35 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - StadCo Tenant Improvements Operating 2,371.45 2/3/2025 Forty Niners Stadium Management Co, LLC SLS-24857 February 2025 Stadium Manager Expenses - Other G&A Operating 62,314.75 1,415,444.32
2/18/2025 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. N/A Bank Fees Operating 12.18 2/11/2025 InTWO, Inc. 43916-US Financial Management System Monthly Services (January 2025) Operating 369.80 2/11/2025 InTWO, Inc. 43917-US Financial Management System Monthly Services (January 2025) Operating 4,974.90 5,344.70
2/18/2025 O.C. McDonald Co., Inc. Application 1 CapEx Project - Plumbing - Plumbing (Boilers) CapEx 55,819.15 2/7/2025 183787 Legal Services (December 2024) Operating 720.00 2/7/2025 Wilson, Ihrig & Associates, Inc. 22162N14 Stadium Noise Monitoring Services (November 2024) Operating 1,880.00 2/7/2025 Wilson, Ihrig & Associates, Inc. 22162N15 Stadium Noise Monitoring Services (December 2024) Operating 1,880.00 3,760.00
February 2025 Total 1,820,939.08$
Santa Clara Stadium Authority
Bills and Claims
Expenses Paid by Wire or ACH Transfer
For the Month of February 2025
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
25-354 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
REPORT TO COUNCIL
SUBJECT
Public Hearing: Opportunity for Public Comment on the First Version of the DRAFT 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan & FY 25/26 Annual Action Plan for the Use of Federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Grant Funds
BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Clara receives entitlement funding from two federal programs administered by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnerships Act (HOME). The purpose of these two programs is to benefit persons of low and moderate incomes by providing decent, affordable housing, public services, and community development.
The City of Santa Clara is an entitlement jurisdiction, which means that HUD awards CDBG and HOME funds every year to be spent locally. The City does not compete for these funds, and the amount awarded each year is based on a population-based formula and the federal budget. This report covers both the five-year 2025-2030 Consolidated plan as well as the FY 25/26 Annual Action Plan, as these are bundled together due to the same time frame for HUD submission. The purpose of this report is to provide public input on the programs and funding for both plans.
Entitlement jurisdictions are required by HUD to develop a Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Consolidated Plan) that identifies goals and needs within the community that could be addressed using annual HUD funding allocations. The Consolidated Plan is a five-year planning document that covers the period of fiscal year 2025-2026 through fiscal year 2029-2030. The City of Santa Clara worked collaboratively with the County of Santa Clara and other entitlement jurisdictions in the County to identify and prioritize housing-related needs across the region, and strategies to meet those needs through the Consolidated Plan.
The City is also required each year to prepare an Annual Action Plan (AAP) to document how the City will use HUD funding consistent with the goals and needs identified in the current Consolidated Plan.
Preparation of both plans must allow for public input through two public hearings: one during the drafting phase and one to present the final version prior to submission to HUD for approval. The April 8, 2025 City Council hearing is serving as the first public hearing for the proposed 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan and for the proposed FY 25/26 AAP and the May 13, 2025 City Council meeting will serve as the second hearing.
DISCUSSION
The City Council is being asked to take public input on both the Consolidated Plan and AAP documents and to provide direction to staff on any modifications that should be made to either plan before returning to the City Council for their final adoption. The final action on both is scheduled for City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 1 of 7
powered by Legistar™
25-354 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
the May 13, 2025 City Council meeting. Once the City Council approves the plans, staff will submit them to HUD for review and approval. Once HUD provides approval and clearance of funds, the City will then work with subrecipients to provide services. In addition to the $1.7 million of HUD funding, the Community Development Department (CDD) anticipates using $565,156 of appropriations in its annual operating budget for Public Service Activities, Capital Improvement Projects, and Affordable Housing Activities. These appropriations will be brought forward for City Council approval, as part of the FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27 biennial operating budget adoption.
Consolidated Plan
The proposed 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan was prepared through a regional collaborative effort undertaken by the County of Santa Clara. The County hired a consultant, Root Policy Research, to conduct a community engagement process to identify needs, priorities, goals, strategies, and activities for future housing and community development activities, which the County should collectively address over the five-year Consolidated Plan period. Engagement activities included a Consolidated Plan website, www.letstalkhousingscc.org <http://www.letstalkhousingscc.org> , public
outreach, community survey, two virtual regional workshops, three focus groups with stakeholders, and “pop-up” outreach events. The results of this combined effort were analyzed to identify goals and needs within the community that could be addressed by each participating jurisdiction using their annual HUD allocations of CDBG and HOME funds. The full draft Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan are included as Attachment 1.
Consolidated Plan Goals as identified through the collaborative outreach process:
Goal Description
Affordable Housing Assist in the creation and preservation of affordable housing for low income and special needs households through continuation of the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP),
Rehabilitation, and/or development of rental units occupied by low-income tenants, and tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA) rental subsidies.
Homelessness Support activities, consistent with Continuum of Care strategies, to prevent and end homelessness. This could include building affordable housing for people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness as well as the provision of support services.
Public Services Support activities that provide basic needs to lower-income households and special needs populations. Services would be provided to low-income households, elderly individuals, homeless persons, people with disabilities, and victims of domestic violence.
Fair Housing Promote fair housing choice, through the following activities: fair housing education, fair housing testing, housing assistance hotline, and landlord/tenant mediation.
Public Facility Public Facility Improvements can include but are not limited to Improvements repairing sidewalks for accessibility, traffic calming measures, and or improvements to public facilities.
City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 2 of 7
powered by Legistar™
25-354 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
Administration Provide management, planning and implementation of the City’s CDBG & HOME programs as well as monitoring of public service and housing projects.
The Consolidated Plan also identifies Goal Outcome Indicators to evaluate the performance of Annual Action Plan activities.
Table 1: Consolidated Plan Goal Outcome Indicators:
Annual Action Plan (AAP)
The FY 25/26 AAP is a one-year Plan that directs how the HUD funds will be spent on projects and activities to address Goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. The following table details the City’s Expected Resources and the projects/activities for the FY 25/26.
City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 3 of 7
powered by Legistar™
Goals Summary for 5-Year Consolidated Plan Cycle
Goal Name Category Needs Estimated Funding Goal Outcome Addressed For 5-Year Cycle Indicator
CDBG : $2,550,000 Homeow ner housing
rehab i I itatio n
200 househo lds
Affordable Affordable Affordab le
Housing Housing Hous ing HOME: $250 ,000 Rental Units rehabilitat ed 2 TBRA
HOME: $2 992 500 125 Househo lds
CDBG: $150,000 Homelessness
Prevention:
Home I essness Homeless Homeless ness 150 people
Non,- CDBG: $900 ,000 Publ1ic Serv ice Activ ities
Public Homeless Publi:c Other tha n Low/Mod .
Services Specia l Services Income Hous ing Benefit:
Needs 2,000 households
Non- HOME: $125 ,000 Publ1ic Serv ice Activ ities
Fair Housing Homeless Fair Housing Other tha n Low/Mod.
Specia l Income Housing Benefit
Needs 150 households
CDBG: $600 ,000 Pub!lic FaCiility or
Public Non-Housing Public Infrastructure Activities
Facilities Comm unity Facilities other than Low/ Mod.
Deve lopment Income Hous ing Benefiit:
1000 people
CDBG: $1 ,050,000
Administration Admin & N/A NIA
& Planning P lanning
HOME: $207 ,500
25-354 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
Table 2: Expected Resources
Note: Numbers in tables are subject to change between DRAFT and FINAL versions.
As part of the AAP, the City identifies a proposed distribution of CDBG funds to Public Service Agencies (PSAs). PSAs are local non-profits that provide services within the community, which are eligible to receive CDBG funding. The City allows PSAs to apply for funding on a two or three-year cycle. HUD restricts the amount of funds that can be set aside for Public Service Activities. Of the estimated $1,050,000 in FY 2025-2026 CDBG funds, $180,000 is the maximum the City can spend on public service activities due to HUD’s 15% public service cap. Following City Council direction, for efficiency purposes, the minimum amount of funding for each Public Service Agency is $30,000.
Based upon the applications received for the current cycle, staff recommends the following distribution of funds. The applicants are ranked from high to low in the table below based on their scoring in the Notice of Funding Availability.
Please note that Next Door Solutions, a public agency that provides services to domestic violence survivors, will continue to be funded with HOME-ARP funding in the amount of $30,000 per year.
HOME-ARP funds are managed through a separate plan and not included in the Consolidated Plan or AAP.
Table 3: Proposed CDBG Funding for Public Service Activities City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 4 of 7
powered by Legistar™
2025-2026 Expected Resources Priority Table
Source Uses of Funds Annual Program Prior Year Total: Narrative Description Allocation Income Resource
CDBG Acquisition $ 930,000 $120,000 so $1 ,050,000 CDBG funds may be used for:
1) Land acquisition for affordable
Housing housing;
Rehabil itation 2) NCIP program and Minor Home
Repair Program;
Public 3) Public infrastruc ture improvements
Improvements and other public facility
improvements;
Public Services 4) Capital Improvements to
Affordable Housing;
Administration 5) Public services;
and Plannino 6) Administration and olannina.
HOME C HOO and $335,000 $10,000 $320,000 $665,000 HOME funds may be used for:
regular HOME 1) TBRA
rental projects, 2) Rental Development and/or rehab
such as property 3) Fair Housing Services
acquisition, new 4) Admin. & Planning.
const., and/or
rehabilitation City expects approx.$100 ,000 of Pl
Acquisition from PY24/25 which is part of the
Prior Year Resources amount. The
Tenant Based City estimates approx. $100,000 of Pl
Rental in PY25/26. $10,000 of which will be
Assistance drawn in PY25/26 for administration
and planning. The remaining $90 ,000
Admin. and will be programm ed in PY26/27.
Planning for
HOME programs If Pl exceeds $100,000, City will
and activities. continue using 10% for admin.
Fair Housing
Services
25-354 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
The AAP process is also used to appropriate other categories of funding to Public Service Agencies (PSAs). Based on prior year funding, and as shown in the two tables below, staff will allocate $565,156 from the General Fund, City Affordable Housing Fund (CAHF), and City Housing Successor Fund (CHSF) as part of CDD’s annual operating budget (subject to City Council approval).
Staff also recommends allocating $1,022,197 in the FY 25/26 Annual Action Plan for CDBG Capital Improvements Projects and HOME Affordable Housing Activities.
Table 4: Proposed Local Funding for other Public Services Table 5: Proposed HUD funding for Capital Improvements and Affordable Housing Attachment 2 (“Annual Action Plan Breakdown-HUD Funds”) provides a more detailed breakdown of the City’s FY 25/26 HUD Expected Resources.
PSA submissions were ranked based on whether the proposed activity was deemed a high priority and consistent with the objectives and priorities of the Consolidated Plan, an organization’s demonstrated managerial and financial capability to receive and expend grant funds, if the majority of beneficiaries to be served were extremely low and low income, the amount of funds leveraged and the agency’s history of drawing funds down. Other considerations were years of service, the number of people served versus the amount of funds granted, and whether other agencies provide similar services.
City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 5 of 7
powered by Legistar™
Funding Proposed # Funding
Public Service Agency Requested Funding served Source
Loaves & Fishes - Mea ls on W heels $ 40,000 $ 30,000 30 CDBG Senio r Adult Legal Assista nce (SALA) -Legal Assistance $ 33,000 $ 30,000 80 CDBG Bill W ilson - Cou nseling & Famil y Therapy $ 35,000 $ 30,000 120 CDBG Silico n Valley Indepe ndent Living Cent er - Housing fo r persons w it h $ 35,145
Disabilit ies $ 30,000 70 CDBG
Heart of t he Valley - Support & Transportat io n Servi ces $ 60,000 $ 30,000 144 CDBG Hope Servi ces - Educational Servic es $ 34,760 $ 30,000 11 CDBG Tota l: $ 237 ,905 $ 180,000 455
Funding Proposed # Funding
Other Agencies Recommended for Funding Requested Funding served Source Project Sent inel - Landlord/Tenant Med iatio n Servi ces $ 74,388 $ 69,159 200 GF Cat holic Charit ies Lo ng-Term Care Ombudsman $ 30,000 $ 15,300 240 GF United Way 211 Services $ 5,000 $ 5,000 500 GF
ABODE - Case Manageme nt Services for TBRA part icipants $ 300,697 $ 300 ,697 N/A CAHF/CHSF County Intensive Case Management $ 125,000 $ 125,000 20 CAHF/CHSF County Home less Prevent io n Prog ram $ 50,000 $ 50,000 20 CAHF Tot al $ 585 ,085 $ 565 ,1 56 980
l~~e.~ ~e,n_~i_E!~--~~-'?.~!!!~n~_ej -~ .HQi:iJ~~-~-l~g ;· II Funding·· I -- --- Funding;
c-o .''"\
f~!l~S.'!'i"i=~ndTng,
..r.J - '
· Re.~uested , -, #served_. 'Source
Rebu il ding Togethe r Silicon Vall ey - Mino r Home $ 209 ,000 $ 200,000 15 CDBG Repa ir Program Neighborhood Conservat ion & Improvement N/A $ 400,000 10 CDBG Program Project Sent inel - Fair Hous ing Serv ices $ 35,000 $ 22,197 15 HOME ABODE - Tenant Based Rental Assistance HOME $ 400,000 s 400,000 15 HOME Tot al $ 644 ,000 $ 1,022,197 55
25-354 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
FUNDING CONTINGENCIES
The Federal Budget for the upcoming year is uncertain, and there is a reasonable chance that the City may receive less federal funding than recent years. Staff have included the following contingency language on pages 154 & 155 of the DRAFT Annual Action Plan, (Attachment 1):
If CDBG funding is less than expected: If the City receives less CDBG Entitlement funding than expected, the Public Service and Administration Caps will be recalculated and amounts adjusted. If the calculation results in a Public Service Cap of less than $180,000, the City will need to reduce its number of Public Service Agencies funded to come under the cap. Further, the amount allocated to the Minor Repair Program may need to be reduced.
If HOME funding is less than expected: If the City receives less HOME Entitlement funding than expected, the CHDO set-aside amounts and the Administration amounts will be recalculated. The TBRA program will then be reduced in funding.
Staff is asking City Council to consider staff’s recommendations, provide input on the contingency language to prioritize public service activities to fund, take any public comment received and then, based on such input and other Council considerations, direct staff to proceed to finalize the plans consistent with staff’s recommendations, or to make any necessary changes or adjustments as provided by City Council. Approved agencies will enter into one-year contracts with the option to renew for a second and third year subject to Federal appropriations.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) in that it is a governmental organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated resources from HUD for FY 25/26 are $1,050,000 in CDBG funds and $665,000 in HOME funds. Additionally, subject to City Council approval as part of the FY 25/26 and FY 26/27 biennial operating budget adoption, the Community Development Department has appropriations of $89,459 in the General Fund, $225,697 in the City Affordable Housing Fund, and $250,000 in the City Housing Successor Fund. These appropriations, in conjunction with the estimated new entitlement funds, would be used to support the goals set forth in the City’s Consolidated Plan.
Actions to recognize and appropriate the CDBG and HOME FY 25/26 federal entitlement funds will be brought forward as part of the FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27 Biennial Operating Budget process.
COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the Finance Department and City Attorney’s Office.
PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 6 of 7
powered by Legistar™
25-354 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
(408) 615-2220, email [email protected].
Preparation of the Consolidated Plan follows a procedure determined by HUD and has included two public hearings to identify community needs and objectives, and to review priorities for the City’s HUD funding allocations. The first public hearing being held now, the April 8, 2025 Council Meeting, and the second will be held at the May 13, 2025 City Council meeting. Comments made at the two public hearings will be noted in the final Consolidated Plan.
The Consolidated Plan will also be made available for public review and comment for a 30-day period from April 11 thru May 13, 2025. Noticing of the 30-day public comment period was published on March 5, 2025 in The Santa Clara Weekly. Noticing will also be e-blasted to community stakeholders.
The Consolidated Plan was also made available on the City’s website, and at public locations including the City Clerk’s Office, the Housing and Community Services Division, and City libraries.
Notification of the availability of the AAP was also emailed to interested parties which include local nonprofit agencies.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Note and File Public Comment on the 2025-2030 DRAFT Consolidated Plan and FY 25/26 Draft Annual Action Plan for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Funds.
2. Approve the DRAFT 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan and FY 25/26 Draft Annual Action Plan, and direct staff to summarize all public comments into the Final versions to be presented to City Council on May 13, 2025 prior to submitting to HUD by May 16, 2025.
Reviewed by: Afshan Hamid, Director of Community Development Approved by: Jōvan D. Grogan, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2025-2030 DRAFT Consolidated Plan and FY 25/26 DRAFT Annual Action Plan
2. FY 25/26 Annual Action Plan Breakdown - HUD Funds
City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 7 of 7
powered by Legistar™
2025-2030
Consolidated Plan
&
2025-2026
Annual Action Plan
Prepared by:
City of Santa Clara
Housing and Community Services Division
Community Development Department
1500 Warburton Ave,
Santa Clara, CA 95050
(408) 615-2490
Submission Date to HUD: May 15, 2025
Housing & Community Services Division
1500 Warburton Avenue,
Santa Clara, CA 95050
(408) 615-2490
Contents
ES-05 Executive Summary – 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ................................................................................. 3 PR-05 Executive Summary – 24 CFR 91.200(b) ................................................................................................ 11 PR-10 Consultation – 24 CFR 91.100, 91.200 (b), 91.215 (I), 91.300 (b), 91.315 (I) ........................................ 12 PR-15 Citizen Participation – 24 CFR 91.105, 91.115, 91.200 (c), 91.215 (I).................................................... 27 NA-05 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 30 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment – 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c), 91.305 (a,b,c), 91.405 ....................................... 32 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ................................................. 43 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ................................................... 45 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) ........................................... 47 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205 (b)(2) ............................................................. 48 NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205 (b) .................................................................................................................. 50 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205 (c)............................................................................................ 54 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment – 91.205 (c) ....................................................................... 64 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) ................................................................ 67 MA-50 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 72 MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210 (a) (b)(2) ...................................................................................... 76 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing – 91.210 (a) ...................................................................... 81 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210 (a) .............................................................. 84 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210 (b) ............................................................................................ 87 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210 (c) ...................................................................................... 89 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210 (d) ............................................................................... 94 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210 (e) ........................................................................................ 99 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 1
MA-45 Non- Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) ............................................................ 101 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion – 91.215 (f) .......................................................................... 110 MA-60 Broadband Needs - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2)………………………………………………………………………………111 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3)………………………………………………………………………………112 SP-05 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 116 SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1) .................................................................................................. 117 SP-25 Priority Needs – 91.215 (a)(2) ............................................................................................................. 118 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b) ....................................................................................... 120 SP-35 Anticipated Resources – 91.215 (a)(4), 91.220 (c)(1,2) ....................................................................... 121 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215 (k) ....................................................................................... 124 SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215 (k) ................................................................................................................ 133 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215 (c) ................................................................. 135 SP-55 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.215 (h) ........................................................................................ 136 SP-60 Homeless Strategy – 91.215 (d) ........................................................................................................... 139 SP-65 Lead Based Paint (LBP) Hazards – 91.215 (i) ........................................................................................ 146 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215 (j) ....................................................................................................... 147 SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230 ............................................................................................................................ 148 Community Engagement Summary – Appendix A............................................................................................. 1 City of Santa Clara Community Needs Survey Summary – Appendix B ............................................................. 1 Public Comment – Appendix C .......................................................................................................................... 1 Annual Action Plan………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..153 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 3
ES-05 Executive Summary – 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)
The City of Santa Clara annually receives Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership Program Funds (HOME) from the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As an “entitlement jur isdiction” receiving these block grant funds, the City is required to prepare a Consolidated Plan every five years, which identifies the City’s priority housing and community development needs and goals.
The Consolidated Plan was developed through analysis of current housing market data; an assessment of the housing and supportive service needs of low and moderate income populations; stakeholder and resident consultations through focus groups and community meetings; and a resident survey. The City collaborated with Santa Clara County and other local governments receiving HUD block grants (“entitlement jurisdictions”) in the development of this 2025-29 Consolidated Plan.
This group of jurisdictions, referred to within this document as the “Santa Clara Cou nty Entitlement Jurisdictions” or simply “Entitlement Jurisdictions,” includes:
• City of Mountain View
• City of Cupertino
• City of Gilroy
• City of Milpitas
• City of Palo Alto
• City of Sunnyvale
• City of San José
• City of Santa Clara
• Santa Clara Urban County
The Consolidated Plan is implemented through the City’s Annual Action Plans (“Annual Action Plan”), which identifies how annual funding allocations are invested to achieve the City’s priorities and goals.
Progress in advancing these goals is also evaluated annually in the City’s Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
How to Read this Consolidated Plan
The Consolidated Plan, as required by HUD has five main sections and associated sub -sections. Each section of the Consolidated Plan has a HUD required alphanumeric identifier, for example ES-# (Executive Summary), PR-# (Process), NA-# (Needs Assessment), MA-# (Housing Market Analysis), and SP-# (Strategic Plan). These sections are followed by the first year Action Plan (AP-#).
The entire plan follows the format prescribed by HUD, with bold lettering denoting the HUD prescribed topic areas and questions. Sections include:
1. Executive Summary (ES)—a brief summary of the primary housing and community development needs identified in the Consolidated Plan; an evaluation of past performance of funds; and an overview of the community engagement activities that informed the plan.
2. Process (PR)—a description of the stakeholder consultation and resident engagement that informed the priority housing and community development needs. Detailed engagement findings are presented 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 4
in a Consolidated Plan appendix.
3. Needs Assessment (NA)— assesses the needs of households at-risk of or experiencing homelessness, low to moderate income families and individuals, elderly residents, victims of domestic violence, persons living with HIV/AIDS, and persons with disabilities.
4. Housing Market Analysis (MA) — provides an overview of the housing market; identifies which households face challenges finding affordable housing; and assesses the business climate and economic development needs.
5. Strategic Plan (SP)— provides five-year priority needs and Goals which will guide investments over the Consolidated Planning period.
6. Annual Action Plan—specifies how the jurisdiction plans to allocate its HUD block grants during the program year.
1. Introduction
1 HUD. Home Reinvestments Partnership Program. https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/affordablehousing/programs/home/ 2 HUD. CPD Consolidated Plans, Annual Action Plans, and CAPERs. https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/consolidated-plan/con-plans-aaps- capers/
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 5
The City of Santa Clara is a small Bay Area city and is part of the booming high-tech area known as Silicon Valley. With a population of approximately 130,000, it is densely populated at only 18.4 square miles. In addition to large technology companies such as Intel, the City is also home to Great America amusement park, Santa Clara University, Mission Santa Clara de Asis (one of 21 California missions), and Levi Stadium, home to the San Francisco 49ers.
It is a region of high socio-economic stratification, containing many of the wealthiest households in the nation; however, of the 48,601 households in the City, 23% (7,745 renters and 3,205 owners) experience some level of housing cost burden across all income groups ( i.e., paying more than 30% of their gross income towards housing costs , some paying more than 50% ). Between 2010 and 20 23, the median household income more than doubled (104%) from $85,294 to $173,670 while the median property value grew by 137% to $1,527,900 and median rent by 109% to $2,837 both of which outpaced income growth during this timeframe with home value increases being particularly extreme. This increase coupled with high interest rates, and inflationary pressure on everyday necessities including food and energy , exacerbates the lack of affordability and likelihood of experiencing cost burden for households in the City of Santa Clara.
These statistics highlight a widening gap between the highest earners and the middle and lower income population within the region. Many lower income residents struggle with severe housing costs driven by a tight and competitive housing market that caters to the demands of the highest earning households, driving up the cost of for-sale and rental housing units. In order to maintain housing affordability and meet the needs of a diverse and growing population, the jurisdictions within the County must work to preserve and expand the supply of housing for all income levels. This will be critical to maintaining the wellbeing and economic prosperity of the region. Stakeholders throughout the community engagement efforts for this plan emphasized the negative impac t of unaffordable housing on staffing for critical roles in communities across the counties.
The City anticipates an allocation of approximately $5,000,000 in CDBG Entitlement & Program Income funds and $1,750,000 in HOME Entitlement & Program Income funds in the 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan period based on the 2024 allocations provided by HUD.
Housing and community development funds provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) are meant to address the needs of low and moderate income households in the City.
The City of Santa Clara as defined by HUD, is an “entitlement” community, because it receives annual funding through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs directly fro m HUD. The City invests these funds in housing and community development-related activities to support lower -income individuals and households and/or those with special needs.
CDBG funding helps jurisdictions address their community development needs to support neighborhood revitalization, economic development, and improved housing opportunities and community services.
Specifically, entitlement community grantees are eligible to use CDBG funds for the provision of public services, public facility and infrastructure projects (Capital Improvement Projects), housing rehabilitation, energy efficiency improvements, and job creation and retention activities. 1 These eligible activities are principally focused on addressing the needs of the HUD defined low - and m oderate-income (“LMI”)
1 The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. “CDBG Entitlement Program Eligibility Requirements.” https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/cdbg-entitlement/cdbg-entitlement-program-eligibility-requirements/ 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 6
households in the community. LMI are households are those whose income do not exceed 80% of the area median family income (AMI), with adjustments for household size and eligible census block groups are typically those where 51% of households are LMI. HUD allows exceptions to the 51% requirement in higher income jurisdictions that do not have a sufficient number of census block groups meeting this threshold. Per HUD, Santa Clara City is an excepti on grantee and therefore has a lower census block group eligibility threshold of 36.96% LMI for CDBG activities as of 2024 based on 2020 American Community Survey data.
HOME funding is intended to be used for various housing‐related programs and activities that address the housing needs of low- and very low-income households. Typically, HOME funds are used to address the housing needs through the preservation or creation of affordable housing. Eligible activities also include tenant‐based rental assistance and financial assistance to homebuyers.2
Federal funds provided through HUD’s CDBG program are intended to primarily focus on activities that will benefit LMI households whose incomes do not exceed 80% of the area median family income (AMI), with adjustments for household size. HUD defines LMI households to include the following three income tiers below:
Extremely Low-Income: households earning 30% or less than the AMI Very Low-Income: households earning 50% or less than the AMI Low-Income: households earning 80% or less than the AMI
Moderate-income households, although not labeled in the HUD defined income tiers above, are included within the tier ‘Low-Income’. HUD defines Moderate Income as a household/family whose income is equal to or less than 80% of AMI but greater than Section 8 Very Low Income (50% of AMI) established by HUD.
Within the City of Santa Clara, 15,570 or 35% of households are defined as low income, with the following breakdown:
13% (5,725 households) are extremely low income;
10% (4,430 households) are very low income; and
12% (5,415 households) are low income
3Consolidated Planning/CHAS data: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cp.html 4DATA USA: https://datausa.io/profile/geo/santa-clara-ca
2 The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. “The HOME Program: Home Investment Partnerships.” https://www.hud.gov/hudprograms/home-program
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 7
2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in Plan
The objective of the Consolidated Plan is to gather information from the community and all partners, as well as demographic and economic data to analyze needs and gaps related to affordable housing, homelessness, programs specific to special needs population, and community development. This information is used to make data-driven decisions to establish community priorities, goals and strategies based on current conditions, expected funds, and local capacity. Through data collection, outreach, and analysis presented in this plan, a clear outline of the priority needs within the City is formed, along with the projects and facilities that are most likely to aid in the development of the City’s Consolidated Plan.
Priority needs identified in this Consolidated Plan include:
1. Housing: Increasing the supply and condition of affordable housing.
2. Homelessness: Stabilizing persons at -risk of and experiencing homelessness through housing solutions, and facilitation of supportive services including mental health and addiction recovery services.
3. Community development: Improve ne ighborhood safety and quality through neighborhood cleanups, street lighting and park improvements, bolster/create public space for senior activities, and food pantries.
4. Economic Development: Provide more opportunities for resident workforce development and/or build outreach campaign for existing programs, create community partnerships to address childcare access as a component of workforce participation.
5. Fair Housing: Improve navigation and case management services for residents needing housing, legal services (related to housing), and basic services documentation assistance.
The City of Santa Clara has therefore identified the following goals for the 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan through extensive data analysis and community outreach:
1. Increase the supply and condition of affordable rental housing for households with incomes ranging from 0-80% AMI.
2. Respond to homelessness and risk of homelessness through housing stabilization, supportive services, mental health services and economic resiliency programs.
3. Invest in infrastructure and public facility improvements that prioritize safety , accessibility and community building.
4. Invest in projects that increase opportunities for workforce development.
5. Address and promote fair housing choice through bolstering case management and navigation of services including legal assistance.
3. Evaluation of past performance
*Section narrative update in progress
CDBG and HOME funds successfully contributed to several projects over the last five years. Those projects have contributed to improved housing affordability and expanded economic opportunities for low- and moderate- income households.
Affordable Housing
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 8
HOME and CDBG funds were used to create a loan program for homeowner rehabilitation to assist with emergency repairs and upgrades to their homes. Approximately 70 homeowners participated. HOME and local funds were used to create a Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program to assist homeless families with deposit and rental subsidy assistance. Approximately 200 households were assisted.
The inclusionary housing policy created 18 new affordable homeownership units. CDBG funding was used to replace the main sewer waste line at Liberty Tower apartments; a 100- unit complex serving the elderly and people with disabilities.
Fair Housing
HOME funds were used to contract with Project Sentinel to provide Fair Housing services, including: tenant- based services; agency -initiated investigations; outreach activities to train housing providers and social service agencies; a Fair Housing Forum for elected and City officials throughout the County; and the creation of a multi -lingual guide on managing property for landlords who may own only a few properties.
Approximately 230 households were served. Additionally, CDBG funds were used to subsidize the rehabilitation of the Project Sentinel facility, in order to provide proper delivery and expansion of services. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 9
Homelessness
CDBG funding provided case management services for Next Door Solutions, a non- profits for victims of Domestic Violence (DV) living in emergency or transitional housing, totaling approximately 500 households.
CDBG funds were provided to the Bill Wilson Center to provide case management services to Transitional Age Youth (TAY), including, but not limited to those exiting foster care, and victims of human trafficking. Approximately 1,300 persons benefitted from this activity. CDBG funds were used to provide meals and groceries through the Health Trust (Meals on Wheels) were attributed to CDBG funding.
Public Services
Over the last five years, CDBG funds have been used to assist over 17,000 Santa Clara residents Public Service activities included Senior Services such as, transportation services, senior day care, and senior legal services. Further, Youth Services assisting runaway youth were also funded. Services assisting domestic violence survivors were also funded.
4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process
The City of Santa Clara coordinated closely with Santa Clara County and other entitlement jurisdictions in stakeholder consultation and resident engagement to leverage opportunities and minimize duplication.
Engagement that was done in coordination with the County included:
A Consolidated Plan website—www.letstalkhousingscc.org—with information about the Planning process including a short video and presentation; a link to the resident survey and activities to prioritize housing and community development needs; and community resources.
The website contains a translation feature for easy conversion into multiple languages.
A community survey, available between October and December 2024, and promoted through supportive service and public agencies that work with low and moderate income residents, city social media, and the Consolidated Plan website. A summary of survey findings is below.
Two virtual regional workshops open to all residents living in and stakeholders serving residents in the county. The workshops included a brief overview about the Planning process, simple activities to express priority needs, and in-depth discussions about needs in breakout rooms.
Interpretation was available in Spanish, Vietnamese and Mandarin.
Three focus groups with stakeholders in housing, supportive services, and community development serving residents throughout the county. After a brief presentation about the Consolidated Plan process—including information on how to circulate the survey and letstalkhousingscc.org website to clients—stakeholders participated in in-depth discussion about priority needs and solutions to needs. Attendees represented affordable housing providers. Service providers serving special needs populations, people with lived experience, legal advocates, childcare service providers, public health agencies, mental health service 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 10
providers, and others.
One-on-one interviews with the Continuum of Care and coordination with the City of San Jose, who receives HOPWA and ESG funding and distributes that funding to the County’s public service departments.
Public Hearings:
o First Public Hearing scheduled for April 8, 2025
o Second Public Hearing scheduled for May 13, 2025
Summary of public comments
A summary of all comments received and city staff responses to those comments can be found in the community engagement appendix, as well as PR sections.
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them Not applicable. All comments were accepted.
Summary
This 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan combines resident feedback, demographic data and analysis, community stakeholder input, and consideration of city resources, goals, other relevant plans, and policies.
The results of this combined effort and analysis results in this five-year Strategic Plan for the allocation of CDBG and HOME funds and activities. These funds will focus on affordable housing, community services and facilities that serve priority populations, and homelessness.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 11
PR-05 Executive Summary – 24 CFR 91.200(b)
1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
The City of Santa Clara Housing and Community Services Division is the agency responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and administering the CDBG and HOME grants, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1 – Responsible Agencies
Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator City of Santa Clara Housing & Community Services Division HOME Administrator City of Santa Clara Housing & Community Services Division
Narrative
Lead and Responsible Agency
The City of Santa Clara (City) is the Lead and Responsible Agency for the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entitlement programs in Santa Clara. Housing and Community Services, a division of the Community Development Department, is responsible for administering the HUD entitlement grants, i ncluding the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME).
Entitlement jurisdictions receive entitlement funding (i.e., non-competitive, formula funds) from HUD. By federal law, the City is required to submit a five -year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan to HUD listing priorities and strategies for the use of its federal funds.
The Consolidated Plan helps local jurisdictions to assess their affordable housing and community development needs and market conditions to meet the housing and community development needs of its populations. As part of the Consolidated Plan process for 2025-2030, the City has collaborated with the County of Santa Clara (County) as the Urban County representing the Cities of Campbell, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga, as well as, six other entitlement jurisdictions including the Cities of Cupertino, Gilroy, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, and San Jose; and the Santa Clara County Housing Authority (SCCHA) to identify and prioritize housing and community development needs across the region, and to develop strategies to meet those needs.
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Adam Marcus,
Division Manager, Housing and Community
Services,
[email protected]
408-615-2451
Kathy Bunce,
Management Analyst
[email protected]
408-615-2498
Website: https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-a-f/community-development/housing- community-services-division
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 12
PR-10 Consultation – 24 CFR 91.100, 91.200 (b), 91.215 (I), 91.300 (b), 91.315 (I)
1. Introduction
Public participation plays a central role in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The City of Santa Clara coordinated closely with Santa Clara County and other entitlement jurisdictions in stakeholder consultation and resident engagement to leverage opportunities and minimize duplication. Community outreach included the following:
A Consolidated Plan website—www.letstalkhousingscc.org—with information about the Planning process including a short video and presentation; a link to the resident survey and activities to prioritize housing and community development needs; and community resources. The website contains a translation feature for easy conversion into multiple languages.
A community survey, available between October and December 2024, and promoted through supportive service and public agencies that work with low and moderate income residents, city social media, and the Consolidated Plan website. A summary of survey findings is below.
Two virtual regional workshops open to all residents living in and stakeholders serving residents in the county. The workshops included a brief overview about the Pl anning process, simple activities to express priority needs, and in -depth discussions about needs in breakout rooms.
Interpretation was available in Spanish, Vietnamese and Mandarin.
Three focus groups with stakeholders in housing, supportive services, and community development serving residents throughout the county. After a brief presentation about the Consolidated Plan process —including information on how to circulate the survey and letstalkhousingscc.org website to clients—stakeholders participated in in-depth discussion about priority needs and solutions to needs. Attendees represented affordable housing developers, nonprofit housing rehabilitation providers, unhoused service providers, community organizations and advocates for special needs populations, people with lived experience, legal advocates, child care service providers, and public housing staff..
One-on-one interviews with the Continuum of Care and coordination with the City of San Jose, who receives HOPWA and ESG funding and distributes that funding to the County’s public service departments.
Art and Wine Festival Pop Up engagement for survey distribution on September 13-14, 2024.
A complete survey analysis and overview of engagement is provided in the appendix of this plan.
Engagement Promotion.
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 13
*Section update in progress
During the development of its Consolidated and Annual Plans and as a general practice, the City coordinated with a variety of housing, public and mental health agencies, and service providers to discuss community needs. These discussions provided an opportunity for these entities to network and learn more about their services and programs. Moreover, their collective feedback was especially valuable in gathering information and shaping priorities for this Plan as it relates to special needs populations, general health, and mental health services in the City and Santa Clara County.
Also, the City participates in the quarterly CDBG Coordinator Group meetings put on by the County.
Jurisdictions throughout the region gather to discuss proposed use of federal funds for the upcoming year.
The City also participates in the Regional Housing Working Group, which is a forum for entitlement and non-entitlement jurisdictions to develop coordinated responses to regional housing challenges.
Also, the Human Services Manager is the representative for the city with the Continuum of Care (CoC). The CoC meets monthly with a group of comprised of governmental agencies, homeless services and shelter providers, homeless persons, housing advocates, affordable housing developers, and various private parties, including businesses and foundations to identify gaps in homeless services, establish funding priorities, and pursue a systematic approach to addressing homelessness. The City also participates in the Community Plan Implementation Team, which includes members of the CoC and other community stakeholders and meets quarterly to evaluate progress toward, identify gaps in homeless services, establish funding priorities, and pursue an overall systematic approach to address homelessness.
Lastly, the City provides The Affordable Housing Resource Guide on its website which contains an extensive list of affordable housing facilities and housing services programs within the City and across the County. The list includes housing resources for elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons experiencing homelessness, persons experiencing domestic violence, and other types of assistance. This is a helpful tool that health, mental health, and services agencies can use to connect their clients with housing resources. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 14
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
The County of Santa Clara is the lead government agency for coordinating, planning, and distributing funding for homeless programs and services in Santa Clara County. The agency has implemented a coordinated, system-wide response to homelessness, known as the County of Santa Clara Supportive Housing System. This system integrates the efforts of the Continuum of Care (CofC), a consortium of partners who collectively work to prevent and end homelessness, with the County of Santa Clara as the lead partner. The CoC is also responsible for planning and conducting the Point-in-Time (PIT) count every two years.
The County of Santa Clara, through its Office of Supportive Housing (OSH), is responsible for applying for federal and state grants on behalf of the region; coordinating access and referrals to housing programs; setting performance benchmarks; and collecting and managing data on homelessness.
The City of Santa Clara is one of many agencies and organizations who interface with the County of Santa Clara’s Supportive Housing System. While the City does not have direct access to HMIS, it does receive its homeless data from the system, and staff work closely with HMIS staff at the County of Santa Clara to deepen understanding of the data and make suggestions where possible.
Stakeholders that are part of the CoC represent local jurisdictions and include community- and faith-based organizations; the Santa Clara County Housing Authority (SCCHA); governmental departments; health service agencies; homeless advocate s; consumers; and research, policy and planning groups. The management information system utilized by the CoC is referred to as HMIS—the Homeless Management Information System, which monitors outcomes and performance measures for all the homeless services agencies funded by the County.
According to the 2023 Point-in-Time (PIT) count, there were a total of 461 homeless persons in the City of Santa Clara. Homeless persons in the City of Santa Clara are also more likely to be unsheltered with 90% of the total population (417 people) living in unsheltered conditions compared to 10% living in sheltered conditions (46 people).
The City of Santa Clara participates in the Community Plan Implementation Team which includes members of the regional CoC and a range of community stakeholders to evaluate the County’s progress in meeting homeless goals and metrics, identify gaps in homeless services and systems, establish funding priorities, and to pursue a systematic and coordinated approach to addressing and ending homelessness.
In 2022 the City convened a six-month Homelessness Taskforce. The Taskforce included stakeholders with a range of perspectives and experience to help identify priorities and provide 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 15
recommendations related to the development of a local plan to reduce homelessness and its impacts. Additionally, the City’s Police Department conducts outreach through the Community Response Team and the Housing and Community Services Division administers grants to several local agencies that offer services to the homeless. The following agencies have received funding from the City:
WeHope Dignity on Wheels Mobile Shower and Laundry Service Santa Clara County Homelessness Prevention System (HPS) Santa Clara County case management for permanent supportive housing clients Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence
Bill Wilson Center
Abode Services
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS.
*Section update in progress
The City is not an ESG entitlement jurisdiction and therefore does not receive ESG funds. However, the City does administer federal grant programs that provide assistance to homeless and low-income families. The City also helps fund and conduct the Point-in-Time (PIT) count, the biennial regional collaborative effort to count and survey homeless persons. The latest count and survey were conducted in January 2025. The data from the PIT is used to plan, fund, and implement actions for reducing chronic homelessness and circumstances that bring about homelessness.
The Santa Clara County Office of Supportive Services takes the role of Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) administration. The County, and its consultant Bitfocus, work jointly to operate and oversee HMIS. Both software and HMIS system administration are now provided by Bitfocus. Funding for HMIS in Santa Clara County comes from HUD, the County of Santa Clara, and the City of San Jose. HMIS is used by many City service providers across the region to record information and report outcomes.
2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities
Table 2 is a list of all agencies, groups and organizations that participated in the regional virtual stakeholder workshops, or in individual stakeholder interviews. Several of the agencies, groups and organizations identified in the table attended more than one workshop.
Anticipated outcomes and areas for improved coordination are referenced in relevant sections throughout this report and a comprehensive summary of stakeholder feedback is provided in the appendix.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 16
Table 2 – Stakeholder Consultation
1 Agency/Group/Organization Abode
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://abode.org/
2 Agency/Group/Organization Affirmed Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://affirmedhousing.com/completed/vela/
3 Agency/Group/Organization Alta Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://altahousing.org/
4 Agency/Group/Organization Bay Area Legal Aid
Agency/Group/Organization Type Fair housing and legal services What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://baylegal.org/
5 Agency/Group/Organization BHSD The Harm Reduction Project Agency/Group/Organization Type County Government
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 17
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website The Q Corner, Behavioral Health Services
6 Agency/Group/Organization Bill Wilson Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services for Families and Children What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.billwilsoncenter.org/
7 Agency/Group/Organization Bridge Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type City Government (San Jose) / Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website Q&A for Original Bridge Housing Program | City of San José 8 Agency/Group/Organization Caminar LGBTQ
Agency/Group/Organization Type
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.caminar.org/
9 Agency/Group/Organization CARAS
Agency/Group/Organization Type County government
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 18
Website Community Agency for Resources, Advocacy and Services (CARAS) | Overdose Prevention Resources | County of Santa Clara
10 Agency/Group/Organization CASA
Agency/Group/Organization Type
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://childadvocatessv.org/
11 Agency/Group/Organization Catholic Charities
Agency/Group/Organization Type Faith based supportive services What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.ccscc.org/?locale=en
12 Agency/Group/Organization City of Los Altos
Agency/Group/Organization Type City Government
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.losaltosca.gov/
13 Agency/Group/Organization City Team
Agency/Group/Organization Type Homelessness Services
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.cityteam.org/
14 Agency/Group/Organization County Office of LGBTQ Affairs Agency/Group/Organization Type County government
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 19
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website Office of LGBTQ Affairs | Division of Equity and Social Justice | County of Santa Clara
15 Agency/Group/Organization Destination Home
Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless prevention
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://destinationhomesv.org/
16 Agency/Group/Organization Downtown Streets Team
Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless prevention
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.streetsteam.org/
17 Agency/Group/Organization Eden Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://edenhousing.org/
18 Agency/Group/Organization Golden State Manufactured Homes Owners League Agency/Group/Organization Type Nonprofit advocacy
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 20
Website https://www.gsmol.org/
19 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Trust Silicon Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type CDFI
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://housingtrustsv.org/
20 Agency/Group/Organization Jamboree Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.jamboreehousing.com/
21 Agency/Group/Organization Lived Experience Advisory Board Agency/Group/Organization Type
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website
22 Agency/Group/Organization Life Moves
Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.lifemoves.org/
23 Agency/Group/Organization Mountain View Chamber of Commerce Agency/Group/Organization Type Civic Leadership
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Market Analysis
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 21
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Individual stakeholder interview
Website https://www.chambermv.org/
24 Agency/Group/Organization Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence Agency/Group/Organization Type Domestic Violence Survivor Resources What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.nextdoorsolutions.org/
25 Agency/Group/Organization Path Ventures
Agency/Group/Organization Type Homelessness services
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://epath.org/path-ventures/
26 Agency/Group/Organization Pride Social
Agency/Group/Organization Type LGBTQ Advocacy
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.pridesocialsouthcounty.com/#OurMission 27 Agency/Group/Organization Project Sentinel
Agency/Group/Organization Type Fair Housing Legal Services What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.housing.org/
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 22
28 Agency/Group/Organization Rebuilding Together Peninsula & Silicon Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Home Rehabilitation
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://rebuildingtogetherpeninsula.org/,
https://rebuildingtogethersv.org/
29 Agency/Group/Organization Resources for Community Development Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://rcdhousing.org/
30 Agency/Group/Organization San Andreas Regional Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive Services for Residents with Disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.sanandreasregional.org/
31 Agency/Group/Organization Santa Clara County Housing Authority Agency/Group/Organization Type Public housing authority What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.scchousingauthority.org/
32 Agency/Group/Organization Satellite Affordable Housing Associates Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 23
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.sahahomes.org/
33 Agency/Group/Organization Senior Adults Legal Assistance Agency/Group/Organization Type Fair Housing Legal Services What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.mightycause.com/organization/Senior-Adults- Legal-Assistance
34 Agency/Group/Organization Silicon Valley Independent Living Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services for people with disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://svilc.org/
35 Agency/Group/Organization SOMOS Mayfair
Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Advocacy / Families What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://www.somosmayfair.org/
36 Agency/Group/Organization Sourcewise
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services for older adults and people with disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://mysourcewise.com/
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 24
37 Agency/Group/Organization The LGBTQ Youth Space
Agency/Group/Organization Type Community advocacy organization What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://youthspace.org/
38 Agency/Group/Organization United Way Bay Area
Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive services
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://uwba.org/
39 Agency/Group/Organization Upwards
Agency/Group/Organization Type Childcare services
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://upwards.com/
40 Agency/Group/Organization Vista Center for Blind and Visually Impaired Agency/Group/Organization Type Services for people with disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Stakeholder focus group
Website https://vistacenter.org/
41 Agency/Group/Organization YWCA Golden Gate Silicon Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Supportive services for domestic violence survivors What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Needs Assessment
How was the Agency/Group/ Organization Stakeholder focus group 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 25
consulted and what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Website https://yourywca.org/
Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting
Not applicable. No agency types were intentionally left out of the consultation process. Over twenty agency types were contacted during the consultation process.
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan
Table 3 – Other local/regional/federal planning efforts Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan?
Housing Element 2023-
2031
City of Santa Clara Identifies barriers to affordable housing and describes geographic sites with opportunities for residential
development for affordable housing.
City of Santa Clara
General Plan 2010 -
2035
City of Santa Clara City
Council
Identifies priority needs of the City of Santa Clara.
2023 HIV
Epidemiology Report
Santa Clara County
Dept. of Public Health
Identifies high-risk populations and plans for reducing HIV diagnoses with increased testing and access to PrEP.
Community Plan to
End Homelessness in
Santa Clara, 2020-2025
Destination Home A five-year plan to guide governmental, nonprofits, and other community members as they make decisions about funding, programs, priorities and needs.
SCHHA Moving to
Work Annual Plan
Santa Clara County
Housing Authority
Addresses housing authority updates and strategies pertaining to public housing and vouchers.
City of Santa Clara
2023 Hazard
Mitigation Plan
City of Santa Clara Consulted the plan to identify potential gaps in provision of services to vulnerable populations displaced by natural disaster and / or climate change.
I 1----1 -----------,
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 26
Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l))
The Consolidated Plan was developed with close coordination with jurisdictional partners in Santa Clara County. The Santa Clara County Office of Supportive Housing (OSH) initiated the collaborative effort by bringing together all entitlement jurisdictions in spring 2024. The jurisdictions issued a joint RFP to hire a consultant team to complete the plans. The entitlement grantee jurisdictions involved in the collaborative effort included: Cupertino, Gilroy, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, City of Santa Clara, and Sunnyvale, as well as the urban county,
Collaboration on stakeholder engagement and resident participation to inform the plan began with a meeting to discuss a proposed engagement plan. The jurisdictions provided lists of priority stakeholders and organizations for engagement, to avoid duplication in outreach efforts. Collaborative engagement consisted of two regional open houses held in the evening and virtually to enable both residents and stakeholders to attend; three stakeholder consultation workshops held on varying days and times in December; and a joint community survey, which was promoted widely by the jurisdictions.
The jurisdictions also prepared a joint regional housing market assessment, with jurisdiction-level market data, to enable jurisdictions to compare housing needs and provide uniform market data in the plans.
The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) was invited to participate in a meeting to discuss housing and community development needs. ABAG shared relevant reports for incorporation into the Consolidated Plans.
In addition, the County hosts and jurisdictions attend CDBG Coordinators and Regional Housing Working Group meetings. During these meetings, projects benefitting the homeless and special needs housing are discussed as is pe nding legislation and local initiatives that impact affordable housing and services for lower income households. Jurisdiction staff also support the countywide biennial Homeless Census. Results from the Census are used to identify homeless populations t hroughout the County and to implement strategies and service priorities to address their needs.
Narrative (optional):
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 27
PR-15 Citizen Participation – 24 CFR 91.105, 91.115, 91.200 (c), 91.215 (I) Summary of citizen participation process/efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting.
As previously indicated , the City of Santa Clara coordinated closely with Santa Clara County and other entitlement jurisdictions in stakeholder consultation and resident engagement to leverage opportunities and minimize duplication.
Engagement that was done in coordination with the County and was targeted to residents included:
A Consolidated Plan website—www.letstalkhousingscc.org—with information about the Planning process including a short video and presentation; a link to the resident survey and activities to prioritize housing and community development needs; and community r esources. The website contains a translation feature for easy conversion into multiple languages.
A community survey, available between October and December 2024, and promoted through supportive service and public agencies that work with low and moderate income residents, city social media, and the Consolidated Plan website. A summary of survey findings is below.
Two virtual regional workshops open to all residents living in Santa Clara County and stakeholders serving residents in the county. The worksh ops included a brief overview about the Planning process, simple activities to express priority needs, and in -depth discussions about needs in breakout rooms. Interpretation was available in Spanish, Vietnamese and Mandarin.
Public hearings
o First Public Hearing scheduled for April 8, 2025
o Second Public Hearing scheduled for May 13, 2025
Public comment on the 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan was open from April 11, 2025 - May 13, 2025. A link to the Consolidated Plan draft document was provided on the Letstalkhousingscc.org website and on the City of Santa Clara website.
A complete survey analysis and overview of resident engagement is provided in the appendix of this plan.
Below are resident respondent demographics and key findings specific to Santa Clara City:
547 respondents, 36 of which are also stakeholders
32% White, 8% Asian, 12% Hispanic
55% homeowners, 33% renters, 9% precariously housed
30% have incomes less than $100k
Survey respondents were asked to identify priority housing, community development, and economic development outcomes with the following results for the City of Santa Clara:
The top housing outcome was more affordable rental housing (46%), followed by more supportive housing for unhoused individuals or families (37%), more affordable homeownership 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 28
(36%), better distribution of affordable housing (33%), and increased shelter capacity (32%); The top community development outcome in the City of Santa Clara was increased access to mental healthcare services (35%), followed by transportation services for seniors (31%), additional and/or higher quality childcare centers (29%), sidewalk and street improvements (20%), and new/improved senior center (26%);
The top economic development outcome selected by respondents in the City of Santa Clara was job training programs (39%), followed by revitalization of neighborhood businesses/commercial areas (37%), improved transportation to areas with job opportunities (35%), more opportunities for small or start-up businesses (31%), and center for seasonal and day laborers (28%);
Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreac
h
Summary of
response and
attendance
Su
mmary
of
Comme
nts
Receive
d
Summary of
comments not
accepted and
Reason
URL (If
Applicable)
Consolidated
Plan website
Countywide Website provided
information on the
Consolidated Plan
process and ways for
community residents
and stakeholders to be
engaged through taking
the survey and
participating in events.
N/A N/A, all
comments
accepted.
Letstalkho
usingscc.or
g
Community
Survey open
from October
to December
2024 (online
and printed
version)
Countywide
residents and
stakeholders
1634 total responses
countywide including
279 stakeholders. 166
responses for
Mountain View
including 13
stakeholders.
Provided in
community
engagement
summary in
appendix and
referenced in
relevant sections
through the
report.
N/A, all
comments
accepted.
Surveymon
key.com/r/
Santa
ClaraCom
munity
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 29
Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach (cont’d)
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response and
attendance
Summar
y of
Comments
Received
Summary of
comments
not accepted
and Reason
URL (If
Applicable)
2 Virtual
Community
Workshops
on
November
14 and
November
20, 2024
Countywide
residents
55 total
participants
between the 2
sessions
provided
Provided in
community
engagement
summary in
appendix and
referenced in
relevant sections
through the
report.
N/A, all
comments
accepted.
3 Virtual
Stakeholder
Workshops /
Focus Groups
on December 5,
December 11
and December
17, 2024
Countywide
stakeholders
(who are also
residents)
representing a
diversity of
organizations
involved in
housing, social
services and
community
development
72 total
stakeholder
participants
across the 3
sessions
provided.
Provided in
community
engagement
summary in
appendix and
referenced in
relevant sections
through the
report.
N/A, all
comments
accepted.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 30
Needs Assessment
NA-05 Overview
The most critical housing needs in the City of Santa Clara and the populations most affected, based on the analysis of HUD-provided Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) and associated data, include:
Moderate and severe cost burden are the most significant issues for both renter and owner households in Santa Clara City;
2,560 renters, or 63% of extremely low income renters, pay more than 50% of their gross household income in housing costs and, as such, face severe cost burden;
820 owners, or 49% of extremely low income owners, pay more than 50% of their gross household income in housing costs and, as such, face severe cost burden;
1,665 renters, or 46% of renters with incomes between 51% and 80% of the area median income, pay 30% of their gross incomes in housing costs and are cost burdened;
3,880 renters regardless of income are severely cost burdened and 3,865 are cost burdened;
Households with the oldest adults (75 years and older) are much more likely to be extremely low income (35% have incomes below 30% of the area median income) than households with adults between 62 and 74 in age and those with young children (17% and 11% are extremely low income respectively);
Persons with disabilities comprise 7.5% of the total resi dent population in the Santa Clara City (9,694 persons with disabilities), according to 2023 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 year estimates. The number of households with disabilities totals 6,730. Of these households, according to CHAS data, 48% have housing needs—or 2,015 households. The need is high across disability types. Fifty-two percent of homeless residents in Santa Clara City report having at least one disabling condition based on the 2023 PIT Count; and
Reported housing problems exist across race/ethnicity for households at or below 30% AMI, with disproportionate housing needs emerging for Black, Hispanic and Asian households in the 30-80% AMI income category. Asian households have disproportionate housing problems in the 80-100% AMI income range.
The current and five -year projected needs by household income and household type, based on CHAS 2016-2020 data are shown in the table below.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 31
Supplemental Figure 1. Future Needs.
Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Future
Total HH # HH With
Hsg Need
% with
Need
Hsg Need
in 5 Yr
All Low Income Households (<80% AMI) 15,570 11,788 76% 12,354 By Income
Extremely low income households (<30% AMI) 5,725 5,124 90% 5,370 Very low income households (30-50% AMI) 4,430 3,330 75% 3,490 Low income households (50-80% AMI) 5,415 3,334 62% 3,494 By Tenure
Low Income Renters (<80% AMI) 10,400 8,890 85% 9,317
Low Income Owners (<80% AMI) 5,160 2,738 53% 2,869
By HH Type
Low Income Small Related HH 5,815 4,205 72% 4,407
Single householders 11,907 945 8% 990
With disability 6,730 3,200 48% 3,354
Low Income Large Related HH 1,035 678 66% 711
Elderly Low Income HH 6,255 3,115 50% 3,265
Current
Household Type
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 32
NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment – 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c), 91.305 (a,b,c), 91.405
Housing Condition: Definitions and Needs
This section provides an overview of the housing needs present in the City, including the degree and distribution of “housing problems” within multiple income brackets.
HUD defines housing problems as units or households with one or more of the following characteristics:
Housing lacking complete kitchen facilities;
Housing lacking complete plumbing facilities;
Overcrowded housing, meaning 1-1.5 persons per room (not only bedrooms); or Cost burdened households —paying more than 30% of income toward housi ng costs, including utilities.
HUD defines severe housing problems as:
Severely overcrowded housing with more than 1.5 persons per room Severely cost burdened households —paying more than 50% of income toward housing costs, including utilities.
The City’s definition of housing in substandard condition utilizes the California Health and Safety Code, Division 13, Part 1.5 Regulation of Buildings Used for Human Habitation, a Substandard Building is one where there exists any of the conditions listed in section 17920.3 to an extent that endangers the life, limb, health, property, safety, or welfare of the public or the occupants thereof.
Population, Household, and Income Growth
Between 2010 and 2023, according to ACS data, the City of Santa Clara’s population increased by 11% (12,771 people) for an annual growth rate of .8% . Household growth was greater, which indicates an increase of smaller or single households . Median income rose by 103. 6%--from $ 85,294 in 2010 to $173,670 in 2023. The strong growth in income compared to modest growth in households indicates displacement of lower income households by higher income households, as well as income growth for existing households.
Table 5 – Housing Needs Assessment Demographics
Data Source: 2010 5 year ACS (Base Year), 2023 5 year ACS (Most Recent Year) Demographics Base Year: 2010 Most Recent Year: 2023 % Change Population 116,468 129,239 11.0%
Households 43,021 48,601 13.0%
Median Income $85,294 $173,670 103.6%
Number of Households Table by Income Range
The table below shows households by income category and household characteristic. Numerically, the largest number of low income households are extremely low income and those with the oldest adults, with incomes lower than 30% of the area median income (or incomes lower than $55,300 per year for a 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 33
family of 4 in 2024) and with a household member over 75.3 Thirty-five percent of these households are extremely low income.
Extremely low income households represent 13% of all households in the City of Santa Clara. Very low income households—those with incomes between 31% and 50% of the area median income —represent 10% of all households, while low income households—50% to 80% of the area median income-- represent 12%.
Large family households are more likely to be lower income than small family households ( 33% of large family households are low income compared to 26% of small family households), although total households is smaller in numbers than small family households.
By age, households with the oldest adults (75 years and older) are much more likely to be extremely low income (35% have incomes below 30% of the area median income) than households with adults between 62 and 74 in age and those with young children (17% and 11% are extremely low income respectively).
Table 6 – Total Households
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
0-30%
HAMFI
>30-50%
HAMFI
>50-80%
HAMFI
>80-100%
HAMFI
>100%
HAMFI
Total
Households 5,725 4,430 5,415 4,360 24,270
Small Family
Households 1,355 1,710 2,750 2,260 14,565
Large Family
Households 355 240 440 430 1,670
Household contains at least one
person 62-74 years of age 1,250 875 1,245 630 3,170
Household contains at least one
person age 75 or older 1,420 905 560 385 800
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or younger 684 525 860 805 3,450
3 https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il/il2024/2024summary.odn?STATES=6.0&INPUTNAME=METRO41940 M41940*0608599999%2BSanta+Clara+County&statelist=&stname=California&wherefrom=&statefp=06&year=202 4&ne_flag=&selection_type=county&incpath=&data=2024&SubmitButton=View+County+Calculations 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 34
Housing Needs Summary Tables
The table below shows the number of households with housing needs, according to HUD’s definitions of need.
The greatest needs based on the data in the table are severe cost burden for extremely low income households, both renters and owners, and cost burden for low income households. Specifically, 2,560 renters, or 6 3% of extremely low income renters, pay more than 50% of their gross household income in housing costs and, as such, face severe cost burden; 820 owners, or 49% of extremely low income owners, pay more than 50% of their gross household income in housing costs and, as such, face severe cost burden; and 1,665 renters, or 46% of renters with incomes between 51% and 80% of the area median income, pay 30% of their gross incomes in housing costs and are cost burdened. 3,880 renters regardless of income are severely cost burdened and 3,865 are cost burdened.
1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs)
Table 7 – Housing Problems
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Substandard
Housing - Lacking
complete
plumbing or
kitchen facilities 290 85 10 25 410 10 0 30 0 40
Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51 people
per room (and
complete kitchen
and plumbing) 325 255 120 225 925 0 20 10 15 45
Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per room
(and none of the
above problems) 395 260 345 240 1,240 4 20 4 75 103
Housing cost
burden greater
than 50% of
income (and none
of the above
problems) 2,560 885 360 75 3,880 820 540 265 70 1,695
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 35
Housing cost
burden greater
than 30% of
income (and none
of the above
problems) 295 1,040 1,665 865 3,865 265 225 525 495 1,510 Zero/negative
Income (and none
of the above
problems) 60 0 0 0 60 100 0 0 0 100
2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden)
Table 8 – Housing Problems 2
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Having 1 or more of
four housing
problems 3,565 1,485 840 565 6,455 840 580 310 160 1,890 Having none of four
housing problems 495 1,250 2,765 2,200 6,710 820 1,115 1,495 1,430 4,860 Household has
negative income,
but none of the
other housing
problems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. Cost Burden > 30%
The table below isolates the housing problem of cost burden and shows the number of households facing burden by household type. Overall, 8,440 renters and 2,718 owners in Santa Clara City face cost burden.
Extremely low income renters who are cost burdened (with incomes of 30% of the area median income and less) total 3,805 and account for 45% of those burdened. There are 1,109 e xtremely low income owners who are cost burdened comprising 41% of those burdened.
By household type, large, related households have the lowest share of households who are burdened across income categories, however, this household type is not as common in Santa Clara City. For all low income elderly, 50% are cost burdened. This compares to 72% of small households, 66% of large households.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 36
Table 9 – Cost Burden >30%
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
Total
Small Related 910 1,025 1,165 3,100 305 325 475 1,105
Large Related 295 135 115 545 4 45 84 133
Elderly 1,235 500 195 1,930 680 290 215 1,185
Other 1,365 765 735 2,865 120 115 60 295
Total need by
income 3,805 2,425 2,210 8,440 1,109 775 834 2,718
4. Cost Burden > 50%
The table below isolates the housing problem of severe cost burden and shows the number of households facing burden by household type.
Overall, 3,390 renters and 1,348 owners in Santa Clara City face severe cost burden. For renters, most severely cost burdened renters have incomes between 30% and 50% of the area median income— possibly due to these households living in market rate rentals for which they can qualify, but not fully afford. Owners, by contrast, who are severely cost burdened are most likely to be extremely low income elderly households, who are struggling to afford property taxes, insurance, and the costs of maintaining their homes.
By household type, elderly households represent the majority of households who are extremely low income and severely cost burdened.
Table 10 – Cost Burden >50%
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 0 0 505 505 290 195 0 485
Large Related 0 0 30 30 4 45 4 53
Elderly 980 180 40 1,200 425 205 60 690
Other 0 1,250 405 1,655 120 0 0 120
Total need by
income 980 1,430 980 3,390 839 445 64 1,348
5. Crowding (More than one person per room)
The table below reports information on households living in overcrowded conditions. Overcrowding is defined by HUD as households living with 1 to 1.5 persons per room (not bedroom). Single family households—or those living with related and extended family—make up the majority of overcrowded households. Renters are far more likely to be in overcrowded conditions than owners, with 2,179 renters living in overcrowded conditions compared to just 150 owners.
Overcrowding information is not available for households with children present. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 37
Table 11 – Crowding Information 1 of 2
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Single family
households 580 465 380 385 1,810 4 40 4 80 128
Multiple unrelated
family households 80 30 25 10 145 0 0 14 8 22
Other, non-family
households 70 20 54 80 224 0 0 0 0 0
Total need by
income 730 515 459 475 2,179 4 40 18 88 150
Table 12 – Crowding Information 2 of 2
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS (data unavailable)
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Households with
children present - - - - - - - - - -
Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance.
Single person households (especially those with low incomes) likely face significant affordability challenges in the City of Santa Clara and are at an increased risk of displacement and homelessness.
According to an analysis of 2021 data from the County’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS), there were a total of 520 homeless single adult households affiliated with the City of Santa Clara in 2021 which represented 76% of total households experiencing homelessness during this time. The risk of homelessness for single person households is countywide. According to the findings from the 2023 January Point-in-Time (PIT) survey in which 79% of respondents self-reported that they were living alone at the time they became homeless. (This represents a total of 798 homeless single person households in Santa Clara County in 2023.)
Additionally, an analysis of demographic data for households enrolled in the County’s Rapid Rehousing (RRH) programs between September 2023 and August 2024 show single adults comprising the largest share of households enrolled in RRH programs at 58% (1,026 single adult households).Single person households have a need for prevention services that respond to immediate needs, as demonstrated by the large share of singe adult households served by the Emergency Assistance Network Homelessness Prevention Services (EAN HP) program. Between December 2022 and November 2023, for example, half (50%) of households who received EAN HP were single adult households.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 38
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.
Persons with disabilities. Persons with disabilities comprise 7.5% of the total resident population in the Santa Clara City (9,694 persons with disabilities), according to 2023 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 year estimates. The number of households with disabilities totals 6,730. Of these households, according to CHAS data, 48% have housing needs—or 2,015 households. The need is high across disability types.
Persons with disabilities and their families are at an increased risk of homelessness and need greater access to housing assistance to avoid housing instability. This is evidenced by the large number of individuals in the City of Santa Clara with a disability who were homeless in 2021. According to the County’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS), a total of 453 homeless persons (59%) affiliated with the City of Santa Clara had a disability during calendar year 2021. Additionally, of those who received homelessness prevention assistance, a total of 51 individuals had a disability (25%); 29 individuals had a behavioral health condition (14%); and 25 individuals had a physical disability (12%).
Findings from the 2023 PIT survey demonstrate the need for assistance even further. According to the survey findings, a total of 522 homeless persons self-reported having at least one disabling condition (or 52% of survey participants). Psychiatric or emotional conditions are common challenges with 31% reporting that they experience these challenges, followed by 29% with post-traumatic stress disorder; 26% with drug or alcohol addictions; 25% with a chronical health problem or medical condition; 21% with a physical disability; 9% with an intellectual or developmental disability; and 3% with an HIV/AIDS- related illness. Higher rates of homelessness among persons with disabilities and other health challenges indicates that these individuals and households have a greater need for housing assistance and supportive services to avoid long-term housing instability and homelessness.
Survivors of domestic violence. The County’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) data for calendar year 2021 show that 262 unhoused persons (34% of the City’s homeless population) with connections to the City of Santa Clara were survivors of domestic violence or trafficking. Data also show the number of households with domestic violence experience who sought out and received support for acute housing instability in 2021. According to the County’s HMIS data for 2021, a total of 27 City of Santa Clara-affiliated survivors of domestic violence received homelessness prevention assistance (13% of total individuals who received assistance during this time).
Housing instability and housing loss are also common for people who are fleeing domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking. Data for calendar year 2021 show a total of 82 individuals with a connection to the City of Santa Clara who reported that they were fleeing domestic violence. Most of these individuals (76%) were women and 70% of households were adults without children. Based on data from local providers who specialize in housing and services for people fleeing domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, and human trafficking, the population of people fleeing in the City of Santa Clara over the course of a year is between 175 and 322 people. The relatively low representation of people who are fleeing in HMIS indicates that this population is more likely to seek support and/or share their experiences with specialized providers.
What are the most common housing problems?
Of all low to moderate income households in Santa Clara City , 70% experience at least one housing problem and 42% report having at least one sever e housing problem. Severe cost burden is the most 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 39
common housing problem as 37% of low to moderate income renter households (3,880) and 49% of low to moderate income owner households (1,695) are paying more than 50% of their income toward housing costs. Cost burden or paying 30% or more of income on housing is reported nearly as frequently as severe cost burden and impacts 37% of renter households and 43% of owner households.
Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems?
Not surprisingly, e xtremely low income renter households in Santa Clara City are the most likely to experience household problems with cost burden and severe cost burden being reported the most frequently. Nearly half of all low to moderate income househo lds in the city, however, also experience some level of cost burden. Stakeholders across virtual workshops for this Consolidated Plan identified people on fixed incomes such as social security as particularly vulnerable, such as seniors, many of whom are living in RVs and do not have sufficient income to afford the rising cost of food, medical services and everyday necessities. Across the region, low to moderate wage workers are not able to live in the region and are either therefore commuting long dista nces to work or these jobs remain unfilled impacting the services available to all County residents.
Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing termination of that assistance.
To describe the characteristics of households at-risk of experiencing homelessness, it is useful to analyze data on homeless persons captured in the County’s Homeless Information Management System (HMIS) for individuals and households affiliated with the City of Santa Clara. Of the 769 individuals experiencing homelessness in the City of Santa Clara in 2021: Hispanic residents (46%) comprised the largest share of the total homeless population followed by individuals identifying as non-Hispanic White (28%), Black or African American (14%), Asian (7%), multiple races (5%), American Indian or Alaska Native (5%), and/or Pacific Islander (2%).
It is also useful to compare these characteristics with the characteristics of persons experiencing homelessness and captured in countywide 2023 Point-in-Time (PIT) especially given that these data are more recent. Of those experiencing homelessness in January 2023:
People of all ages experience homelessness in the county, with no one age group standing out.
About half (49%) homeless persons were middle-aged (35 to 54) and 29% were age 55 and older. Twenty-two percent (22%) were under age 35 and less than 1% were under 18 years.
Around a quarter (26%) reported experiencing their first episode of homelessness as a young adult (18 to 24).
White residents (47%) comprised the largest share of the homeless population followed by individuals who identify as a different racial group (18%), Black (15%), multiracial (7%), and/or Asian (6%). Less than 5% of homeless persons identified as other races. Forty-one percent (41%) were of Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 40
Men were more likely to be homeless: 66% self-identified as male compared to 32% of females and 2% who identified as transgender or non-singular or questioning. Additionally, only 3% self- reported that they were currently pregnant while homeless.
Characteristics of Households receiving Rapid Rehousing Assistance whose Assistance is Ending
The City of Santa Clara defines populations that require services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness as households or individuals who met the definition of “at-risk” and who: previously experienced homelessness, found housing with support from emergency or temporary assistance and now need further assistance or services to remain housed; have an annual income at 30% Area Median Income (AMI) or lower and pays more than 50% of income toward housing costs; or has an annual income at 50% AMI or lower and has at least one sign of housing instability.
The Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) database identifies homeless persons who have enrolled in a shelter or housing program, regained housing and exited the program and re-appear in HMIS within 2 years. Among individuals who regained housing in 2019, a total of 45 individuals with a connection to the City of Santa Clara returned to homelessness within two years. Data from HMIS provides insight on the characteristics of this population including:
Around half (49%) who returned to homelessness were originally served by and exited from emergency shelter versus a permanent housing program, transitional housing, or street outreach.
A disproportionate share identify as Black of African American with 27% of those who return to homelessness identifying as Black or African American compared to 14% of the overall homeless population who identify as Black or African American.
Young adults (18 to 24) had the highest rates of return to homelessness of all age groups (60% returned), followed by ages 45 to 54 (47% returned), and ages 55 to 64 (32% returned). According to the City and data from the Homelessness Prevention System (HPS), households enrolled in services and programs need an average of $5,394 in financial assistance as well as case management support to avoid housing loss and homelessness.
The Santa Clara County Continuum of Care connects clients with:
7 Employment Services, including the Living Wage Employment Initiative (LWEI) Affordable Housing
Mainstream Services and Systems
Landlord Incentive Program
As households near the end of the RRH program, providers work with clients on housing stability. This is done through:
Identifying potential challenges that may arise and troubleshooting them in advance. Scheduling follow-up visits – case management may continue for six months after the competition of rental assistance.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 41
Ensuring there is a crisis plan in place.
If household has greater financial barriers or extra ordinary housing challenges, there may be a need for additional intervention or longer-term assistance. This can be done through:
o Transfer to Permanent Supportive Housing Program
o Referral to HCV with the Housing Authority Move to more affordable housing.
If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at -risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates:
The City of Santa Clara defines populations “at-risk” of homelessness as someone who will lose their primary nighttime residence in 14 days provided that no subsequent residence has been identified and the person/family lacks the resources or support networks needed to obtain other permanent housing.
The County’s CoC serves at-risk households through the Homeless Prevention System (HPS) and uses the Vulnerability Index—Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (VI-SPDAT) to identify the most vulnerable populations and to prioritize the groups with the highest needs for appropriate and available housing and supportive services. The County’s CoC also reviews local data and national trends regarding at-risk groups to identify risk factors and uses these factors to leverage the Prevention Re-Housing Vulnerability Index Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (Prevention-VI-SPDAT) which assess household eligibility for the County’s HPS.
The Prevention-VI-SPDAT scores income and financial health; history of homelessness; eviction risk; abuse and/or trafficking; interaction with emergency services including criminal justice; and acuity of mental and physical needs. The criteria developed for the HPS include: low income, self-report of imminent risk of homelessness or unsafe housing situations, and a Prevention-VI-SPDAT score of eight or greater. These factors and criteria are in line with the self-reported causes and conditions of homelessness and the characteristics of individuals accessing homeless services, programs, and homeless prevention assistance in Santa Clara County.
Eligibility for HPS services requires household income at or below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI), expected housing loss within 14 days or an unsafe housing situation, and an assessment score demonstrating a high risk of housing loss. In addition to the HPS, the City of Santa Clara offers a number of smaller programs that provide prevention services to support at-risk populations in which the City is able to conclude the populations with the most acute housing needs and at those at the greatest risk of housing instability.
For example, according to 2021 data on the individuals who sought housing and support services for housing stability, 25% had a disability followed by those with a behavioral health condition (14%), domestic violence experience (13%), a physical disability (12%), and those who were veterans (4%).
Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness
Severe cost burden, lack of affordable housing, unsafe housing situations (e.g., domestic violence or sexual harassment), disabilities, and unaddressed mental health needs are linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness in the City of Santa Clara. These characteristics are demonstrated by data filtered from the County’s Homeless Information Management System (HMIS) in which homeless prevention services were provided to individuals and households with particular characteristics including individuals with a disability (25%), behavioral health condition (14%), experience with domestic violence 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 42
(13%), physical disability (12%), and veterans (4%). Additionally, during the community engagement conducted to inform the City’s Plan to Reduce Homelessness and its Impacts, focus group participants identified characteristics including criminal histories and low credit scores as the primary risk factors for homelessness in Santa Clara City.
In the City of Santa Clara, individuals and households without these characteristics are also at risk of housing instability and homelessness if they cannot afford their rent, lose their job, and/or cannot access housing. According to the 2023 PIT survey, top five most commonly reported obstacles were:
can’t afford rent; no job/income; no housing available; no money for moving costs; and housing process is too difficult.
Characteristics and factors were also identified by the 2,067 households enrolled in the County’s Homelessness Prevention (HPS) program between December 2022 and November 2023. When asked why they were seeking assistance, households cited reasons including income loss (37%), income reduction (15%), change in family composition (13%), medical emergency (12%), and unexpected major expense (5%). Of the 833 households enrolled in the EAN-HP program, the top reasons for seeking assistance included: income loss (30%), income reduction (15%), medical emergency (13%), moving from temporary arrangement to permanent housing (12%), and unexpected major expense (8%).
Stakeholders in virtual workshops for this plan expressed a need for expanding a one-time emergency payment fund for residents to avoid eviction with parameters and support for households who have repeat needs.
Discussion
See above.
8 National Alliance to End Homelessness (2019) State of Homelessness https://endhomelessness.org/homelessness-in-america/homelessness-statistics/state-of-homelessness-report/ 9 Santa Clara County Homeless Census and Survey Comprehensive Report 2019. https://www.sccgov.org/sites/osh/ContinuumofCare/ReportsandPublications/Documents/2015%20Santa%20Clara%20County%20Ho meless%20Census%20and%20Survey/2019%20SCC%20Homeless%20Census%20and%20Survey%20Report.pdf 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 43
NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2)
Introduction
According to HUD, a disproportionate need exists when any group has a housing need that is 10 percentage points or more than the jurisdiction or the household category as a whole. This section assesses the needs of racial and ethnic groups with disproportionately high needs.
The tables below show housing needs for households by area median income range and by race and ethnicity. The data indicate that:
For 0-30% AMI households, needs are significant across racial and ethnic groups: 90% of Asian households, 86% of Black and Hispanic households, and 84% of White households have housing needs. No disproportionate need by race/ethnicity exists in this high need income category.
For 31-50% AMI households, disproportionate needs emerge by race and ethnicity for Black and Hispanic households at 85% and 82% compared to 70% of White households;
For 51-80% AMI households, disproportionate needs continue to be present for Black households (71%) but also appear for Asian households (69%) compared to 54% of White households;
For moderate income, 81-100% AMI households, needs continue to be disproportionately higher for Black households (83%) and Asian households (51%). Hispanic households in this income range also have disproportionate needs at 53% compared to 41% of White households.
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Table 13 – Disproportionally Greater Need 0-30% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 4,965 760 0
White 1,765 325 0
Black / African American 270 45 0
Asian 1,450 165 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 30 0 0
Hispanic 1,225 205 0
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 44
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Table 14 – Disproportionally Greater Need 30-50% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 3,330 1,100 0
White 1,275 545 0
Black / African American 140 25 0
Asian 1,030 275 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 40 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 815 180 0
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Table 15 – Disproportionally Greater Need 50-80% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 3,345 2,070 0
White 1,135 980 0
Black / African American 124 50 0
Asian 1,115 490 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 4 15 0
Hispanic 875 515 0
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Table 16 – Disproportionally Greater Need 50-80% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,085 2,275 0
White 640 925 0
Black / African American 95 20 0
Asian 965 910 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 315 280 0
Discussion
Please see above.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 45
NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Problems – 91.205 (b)(2)
Introduction
According to HUD, a disproportionate need exists when any group has a housing need that is 10 percentage points or more than the jurisdiction or the household category as a whole. This section assesses the needs of racial and ethnic groups with disproportionately severe housing problems or needs.
The tables below show severe housing needs for households by area median income range and by race and ethnicity. The data indicate that:
For 0 -30% AMI households, the share of households experiencing severe needs disproportionately high for Asian and Hispanic households (81% and 86% respectively have severe needs).
Similarly, for 31-50% AMI households, Asian and Hispanic households have severe needs that are disproportionate to non-Hispanic White households in the city at 61% and 48% respectively.
For 51-80% AMI households, only Asian households have disproportionate severe housing needs compared to non -Hispanic White households, and no disproportionate needs exist by race/ethnicity compared to the City overall.
At the moderate income level (81 -100% AMI), Asian households with severe needs becomes disproportionate to non-Hispanic White households as well as to the City overall at 27% compared to 17% for the jurisdiction (all race/ethnicity).
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Table 17 – Severe Housing Problems 0-30% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 4,405 1,315 0
White 1,410 680 0
Black / African American 230 85 0
Asian 1,305 310 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 30 0 0
Hispanic 1,225 205 0
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 46
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Table 18 – Severe Housing Problems 30-50% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,065 2,365 0
White 675 1,140 0
Black / African American 75 90 0
Asian 795 510 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 40 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 475 515 0
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Table 19 – Severe Housing Problems 50-80% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,150 4,260 0
White 345 1,770 0
Black / African American 10 164 0
Asian 475 1,130 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 4 15 0
Hispanic 250 1,135 0
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Table 20 – Disproportionally Greater Need 50-80% AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Problems Has one or more
of four housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has no/negative
income, but none of the
other housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 725 3,630 0
White 115 1,455 0
Black / African American 20 100 0
Asian 515 1,360 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 80 515 0
Discussion
Please see above.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 47
NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2)
Introduction
This section assesses disproportionately greater needs of cost burden . A household is considered cost burdened when paying more than 30% of its gross household income toward housing costs, including utilities, and is severely cost burdened when paying more than 50% of its income toward housing costs.
Overall in the City o f Santa Clara, 33% or 14,513 households are cost burdened. Of these cost burdened households, 7,916 —or 55% —pay between 30% and 50% of their incomes in housing costs; another 6,597—or 45% —pay more than 50%. Black households are disproportionately likely to experience moderate cost burden (greater than 30% of income on housing), with 33% of Black households burdened compared to 18% in the city overall. Black and Hispanic households are also disproportionately likely to experience severe cost burden, 25% for e ach, compared to 15% in the jurisdiction overall. Severe cost burden is an indicator of homelessness risk and, as such, Black and Hispanic households have higher risks of homelessness than other races.
Housing Cost Burden
Table 21 – Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No/negative income (not computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole 29,355 8,060 6,565 210
White 10,525 2,940 2,325 65
Black / African American 445 349 270 0
Asian 14,365 2,940 2,175 70
American Indian, Alaska Native 55 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 135 0 34 0
Hispanic 2,885 1,570 1,520 55
Discussion:
Please see above.
NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205 (b)(2) As defined above, a disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a specific racial or ethnic group at a given income level experience housing problems or cost burden at a greater rate (at least 10 percentage points or more) than that income level in the jurisdiction as a whole.
Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole?
Yes, as discussed above,
Black households are disproportionately likely to experience cost burden compared to the jurisdiction overall, with 33% of Black households burdened compared to 18% overall.
Black and Hispanic households are disproportionately likely to experience severe cost burden, with 25% severely burdened, compared to 15% in the jurisdiction overall. Severe cost burden is an indicator of homelessness risk and, as such, Black and Hispanic households have higher risks of homelessness than other races.
By race, ethnicity, and income:
For 0-30% AMI households, needs are significant across racial and ethnic groups: 90% of Asian households, 86% of Black and Hispanic households, and 84% of White households have housing needs. No disproportionate need by race/ethnicity exists in this high need income category.
For 31-50% AMI households, disproportionate needs emerge by race and ethnicity for Black and Hispanic households at 85% and 82% compared to 70% of White households;
For 51-80% AMI households, disproportionate needs continue to be present for Black households (71%) but also appear for Asian households (69%) compared to 54% of White households;
For moderate income, 81-100% AMI households, needs continue to be disproportionately higher for Black households (83%) and Asian households (51%). Hispanic households in this income range also have disproportionate needs at 53% compared to 41% of White households.
If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs?
Residents in the county, and in the City of Santa Clara, with needs that are not adequately captured in secondary data include survivors of domestic violence and LGBTQ+ individuals —both of whom need far more transitional and permanent supportive housing tailored to their needs than is available in the county. Additional services for immigrants, such as language services, citizenship classes, and navigation assistance are also needed . For populations with alcohol and substance abuse issues, more sober living environments and rehabilitation services are needed.
Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community? Minority concentration is defined as census tracts where the percentage of individuals of a particular racial or ethnic minority group is at least 20 percentage points higher than the citywide average. Minority refers to all ethnic groups other than non-Hispanic white.
According to American Community Survey 2023 5 year estimates, the City of Santa Clara is 32% White, 2%
Black/African American, and 48% Asian. Although the City of Santa Clara has 2 census tracts with high concentration of Asian households, the median inco mes are very high and therefore do not represent a concentration by both race/ethnicity and lower income households. In the 2023 Housing Element, the City of Santa Clara identifies small groupings of census blocks that have greater concentrations of Asian and Hispanic lower income households and highlighted efforts to increase outreach to these neighborhoods on affordable housing opportunities and the need to provide information on city services in relevant languages for these communities.
2020-2025 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 48
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 50
NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205 (b)
Introduction
Santa Clara County Housing Authority administers a variety of federal rental assistance programs for use in the County of Santa Clara. These programs are targeted toward low -, very low -, and extremely low - income households, more than 80% of which are extremely low -income families, seniors, veterans, persons with disabilities, and formerly homeless individuals. 4 In Santa Clara County, the vast majority of federal publicly supported housing is provided through the Section 8 voucher program as SCCHA RAD transitioned all of its previous public housing invento ry and currently only 4 units of traditional public housing units remain. Housing voucher programs include:
1) Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program which allows households to find a privately owned unit on their own paying approximately 30% of their monthly income towards rent and SCCHA paying the balance to the property owner; and
2) Project Based Vouchers (PBV) Program Project that are attached to individual units in the publicly assisted housing inventory managed by SCCHA.
SCCHA also manages special purpose voucher programs that serve other targeted populations including the Veteran’s Affairs program, Family Unification and Disability programs. Some SCCHA special programs combine housing assistance with savings incentives and other include case management services provided in collaboration with community service agencies.
As of January 2025, there are approximately 18,000 voucher holders across the county with the majority living in the City of San Jose (70%). The total waiting list for all vouchers is always open and is currently at 42,872 which includes both HCV and PBV. Households are optionally on both lists and therefore duplicative. Additionally, eligibility is not verified until the household is selected, therefore the total waiting list number is considerably larger than the actual unduplicated number of households actively seeking a housing voucher. The waiting list household characteristics include 41% families with children, 20% elderly, 18% with disabilities and 2% veterans. The waiting list is operated on a lottery basis and there is a preference for families who have lived and worked in the county for the past 5 years and for veterans. PBV units are tracked for accessibility features and a lottery is drawn to match the needed features with tenants.
In 2008, SCCHA was designated a Moving to Work (MTW) agency. The MTW program is a federal demonstration program that allows greater flexibility to design and implement more innovative approaches for providing housing assistance.5 The Moving to Work program has 60 different initiatives with the goal of improving outcomes and experiences for both residents and landlords. Administrative streamlining has had an effect including paperwork timing and inspections which helps get people into units more quickly. This streamlining also helps with recruiting landlords to the program as they benefit from the consistency of payments.
The tables below show the number of participants in publicly supported housing by program managed by SCCHA in the City of Santa Clara, characteristics and race/ethnicity of voucher holders.
4 Santa Clara County Housing Authority. “About SCCHA.” https://www.scchousingauthority.org/about-SCCHA/ 5 SSCHA. “Moving to Work FY2020 Annual Plan.” October 16, 2019. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 51
Totals in Use
Table 22 – Public Housing by Program Type in the City of Santa Clara Data Source: Santa Clara County Housing Authority, January 2025
Certificate
Mod- Rehab
Public Housing Vouchers
Total
Project
-based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled*
# of unit vouchers in use 0 0 4 941 227 714 81 6 3
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Characteristics of Residents
Table 24 – Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type in the City of Santa Clara Data Source: Santa Clara County Housing Authority, January 2025
Certificate
Mod- Rehab
Public Housing Vouchers
Total
Project
-based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Average Annual
Income NA NA 24,642 21,881 12,700 24,800 25,242 8,111
Average length
of stay NA NA 13.8 11.3 3.0 14.0 4.9 9.3
Average household
size NA NA 1.5 1.9 1.4 2.1 1.2 2.8
# homeless at
admission 0 0 0 108 59 49 28 0
# of elderly program
participants (>62) 0 0 3 422 82 340 52 1
# of disabled
families 0 0 1 443 109 334 30 1
# of families requesting
accessibility features 0 0 1 NA NA NA NA NA
3 of HIV/AIDS
program participants NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
# of domestic
violence victims NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 52
Race of Residents
Table 25 – Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type in the City of Santa Clara Data Source: Santa Clara County Housing Authority, January 2025
Race
Certificate
Mod- Rehab
Public Housing Vouchers
Total
Project-
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled*
White 0 0 0 515 153 362 52 5 2
Black/African
American 0 0 0 186 30 156 15 0 1
Asian 0 0 4 195 28 167 3 0 0
American Indian /
Alaska Native 0 0 0 23 13 10 4 1 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0 15 2 13 4 0 0
Other 0 0 0 7 1 6 3 0 0
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition
Ethnicity of Residents
Table 26 – Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Ethnicity
Certificate
Mod- Rehab
Public Housing Vouchers
Total
Project
-based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled*
Hispanic 0 0 0 303 89 214 19 4 2
Not Hispanic 0 0 4 638 138 500 62 2 1
Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units:
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination, based on a disability, in programs and activities conducted by HUD, or that receive financial assistance from HUD. Currently, 17% of HCV participant families report a disability, count ywide. Additional data on the needs of those in units or on the waitlist is unavailable. However, here is some context on how SCCHA addresses the most immediate needs of public housing tenants, during the intake and recertification process.
The SCCHA 2022 Administrative Plan Section 1.8 defines a disability as “A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of an individual.” 6 The applicant or participant must have a record of such impairment or being regarded as having such impairment. Section
1.8 also discusses the PHA’s policy on reasonable accommodations, to address the immediate needs of public housing tenants either seeking an affordable accessible unit or accommodation to an existing unit:
6 https://www.scchousingauthority.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Chapter_1_-_Policies_and_Objectives_rev._05- 01-2021.pdf
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 53
“Requests for reasonable accommodations will be assessed on a case -by-case basis. If the HA finds that the requested accommodation creates an undue administrative or financial burden, the HA will present an alternate accommodation that will still meet the need of the person. If no alternate accommodation exists, the HA may deny the request. If the disability and/or need for the accommodation is not readily apparent, the HA will require written verification of the disability and/or need for the accommodation from a knowledgeable professional or reliable third party. The HA will provide a written decision to the person requesting the accommodation within 15 days of the date that the verification is received. If a person is denied the accommodation or feels that th e alternative suggestions are inadequate, they may request an informal hearing to review the HA’s decision.”
Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders
The County’s rental market continues to be a challenge for leasing units to Housing Choice Voucher holders as they face high rents and reluctance from landlords to lease units despite the illegality of income source discrimination. Among other efforts to address this issue, SCCHA is continuing to promote the use of Project-Based Vouchers and actively participates in countywide efforts to increase the affordable housing supply. An initiative of the MTW program to address the issue of landlord participation is the provision of an incentive of $1500 bonus to new landlords and $1500 to landlords who re-rent to a new voucher holder. SCCHA has also created an owner/service department to serve landlords in the program to address issues of payments and any tenant issues.
In 2025, SCCHA will start using the Small Area Median Income so that vouchers will have more value and help people get into some of these higher opportunity areas in the county. They are also working on a Housing Mobility Pilot Program with the goal of moving families with Housing Choice Vouchers to higher income and opportunity areas in the county. As part of the Housing Mobility Pilot Project, SCCHA conducted focus groups with families to identify policies that are barriers to being successf ul in the program. The program will help them find a unit in a high opportunity area, provide security deposit and application fee assistance. They are currently identifying 100 families to participate in the program who are current voucher holders.
Services regularly requested by tenants include:
General financial assistance for emergencies;
Security deposit assistance;
Digital services, broadband, training and devices.
SCCHA applied for a digital equity grant through HUD which was not successful but will continue to seek out funding opportunities to address this important gap as it is often referenced as a high priority need for senior residents in particular impacting access to resources.
12 Cornell University. Disability Statistics. http://www.disabilitystatistics.org/reports/acs.cfm 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 54
NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205 (c)
Introduction:
The tables below display demographics of homeless persons within the County and/or City of Santa Clara.
Homeless Needs Assessment
A total of 9,903 individuals were counted as experiencing homelessness in Santa Clara County in 2023.
Of homeless persons in the county, 75% were unsheltered homeless (7,401 unsheltered people) and 25% were sheltered homeless (2,502 people). In the City of Santa Clara, there were a total of 461 homeless persons, representing 5% of the County’s total homeless population in 2023. In Santa Clara City, homeless persons are more likely to be unsheltered with 90% living in unsheltered conditions (417 unsheltered people) and 10% living in sheltered conditions (44 sheltered people).
Of the homeless population in 2023, a total of 3,166 individuals were chronically homeless (32% of the population); 12% were families; 8% were unaccompanied youth; 5% were veterans. Three percent (3%) of homeless persons self-reported that they were pregnant while experiencing homelessness.
Fourteen percent of survey respondents from North County (majority of respondents for North County were from Santa Clara City) indicated that they are or had been homeless. Countywide, a quarter (25%) of households with disabilities, 26% of large households, 27% of renters with household income less than $49,999, and 31% of single parents experienced homelessness within the last year in Santa Clara County.
Continuum of Care and Supportive Housing System. The Santa Clara County Continuum of Care (CoC) is a group of stakeholders that work together to prevent and end homelessness in Santa Clara County. The CoC is run by the Office of Supportive Housing (OSH) and the nonprofit organization Destination: Home and is responsible for ensuring that efforts to end homelessness are implemented throughout the community; programs and systems are effective; identifying, supporting, and advocating for changes to improve services and outcomes; monitoring the CoC’s performance; and planning and conducting the Point-in-Time (PIT) count every two years.
Stakeholders that are part of the CoC represent local jurisdictions and include community- and faith- based organizations; the Santa Clara County Housing Authority (SCCHA); governmental departments; health service agencies; homeless advocates; consumers; and research, policy and planning groups. The management information system utilized by the CoC is referred to as the Help Management Information System (HMIS) which monitors outcomes and performance measures for all the homeless services agencies funded by the County.
The City of Santa Clara participates in the Community Plan Implementation Team which includes members of the regional CoC and a range of community stakeholders to evaluate the County’s progress in meeting homeless goals and metrics, identify gaps in homeless services and systems, establish funding priorities, and to pursue a systematic and coordinated approach to addressing and ending homelessness.
In 2022 the City convened a six-month Homelessness Taskforce. The Taskforce included 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 55
stakeholders with a range of perspectives and experience to help identify priorities and provide recommendations related to the development of a local plan to reduce homelessness and its impacts. Additionally, the City’s Police Department conducts outreach through the Community Response Team and the Housing and Community Services Division administers grants to several local agencies that offer services to the homeless. The following agencies have received funding from the City:
WeHope Dignity on Wheels Mobile Shower and Laundry Service Santa Clara County Homelessness Prevention System (HPS) Santa Clara County case management for permanent supportive housing clients Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence
Bill Wilson Center
Abode Services
Homeless Point-in-Time (PIT Count) Census and Survey. Every two years, the County of Santa Clara, City of San Jose, the Continuum of Care, and other cities in the county (including the unincorporated areas) conduct the Santa Clara County Homeless Census and Survey to gather PIT data on the number of persons experiencing sheltered and unsheltered homelessness during the last 10 days of January.
The PIT Count is performed using HUD recommended practices for counting and surveying homeless individuals. This survey includes field enumeration of homeless individuals residing in the County for a given night in January. Sheltered homelessness reflects persons occupying shelter beds in which data is obtained from HMIS and/or directly from providers. Unsheltered persons are counted by direct observation. Subsets of the sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations is also surveyed to provide demographic data on the wider homeless population living in Santa Clara County and cities across the county.
The most recent PIT (and the most recent data available at the time of this report) was conducted between January 24, 2023 and January 25, 2023. Counts were conducted for the Cities of Gilroy, Morgan Hill, Cupertino, Monte Sereno, Mountain View, Los Gatos Hills, Palo Alto, Saratoga, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara City, and the unincorporated areas in the northwestern portion of Santa Clara County, as well as portions of the Cities of Campbell, Los Gatos, Milpitas, San Jose, Los Gatos, and the unincorporated areas located in the eastern and southwestern areas of the county.
In the weeks following the 2023 count, Santa Clara County administered a survey to 1,006 individuals experiencing sheltered and unsheltered homelessness to understand their housing experiences, demographics, and socioeconomic characteristics. Data from the survey provided valuable insight on individuals’ health and employment status, access to services, causes of homelessness, and other demographic and household information. Findings from the survey are summarized below and throughout this section.
Around one-third (31%) self-reported having a psychiatric or emotional condition followed by post-traumatic stress disorder (29%), drug or alcohol use (26%), chronic health problem (25%), physical disability (21%), traumatic brain injury (10%), and/or intellectual or developmental disability (9%). Only 3% reported having an HIV/AIDS-related illness.
Seventy-one percent (71%) reported that they are currently accessing food services followed by bus passes (36%) and outreach services (20%).
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 56
Importantly, one in five (22%) are not using any services and only 12% are accessing mental health services.
When asked what may have prevented them from becoming homeless, individuals cited programming and services including: employment assistance, rent/mortgage assistance, mental health services, help accessing benefits, alcohol/drug counseling, legal assistance, and/or case management after leaving institutions.
Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). The Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) is a secure online database that stores data on all homelessness services that are provided in Santa Clara County to improve access to housing and services and to strengthen the County’s efforts in preventing and ending homelessness. The County’s HMIS serves approximately 181,000 clients.
Data from the County’s HMIS may be filtered to determine the number and type of individuals and households affiliated with the City of Santa Clara that are homeless and seeking assistance each year.
Affiliation is determined by any of the following: 1) the individual currently residents in Santa Clara City or previously lived in the city before becoming homeless; 2) the individual goes to school in Santa Clara City; 3) the individual works in Santa Clara City; and/or 4) the individual spends most of their time in Santa Clara City. Data from the HMIS database for the City of Santa Clara represent individuals and households affiliated with Palo Alto who accessed housing and services in 2021—the most recent data available at the time of this report.
Number and Demographic Characteristics of Unhoused
There were a total of 9,903 unhoused persons in Santa Clara County in 2023 in which 75% were unsheltered (7,401 unsheltered people) and 25% were sheltered (2,502 sheltered people). In the City of Santa Clara, there were a total of 461 homeless persons in 2023, representing 5% of the County’s homeless population. Of homeless persons in Santa Clara City, 90% were unsheltered (417 unsheltered people) and 10% were sheltered (44 sheltered people).
Over the last year, homelessness in Santa Clara City increased by 5% (or 21 more homeless people), the smallest increase of jurisdictions in the county that experienced population increases in overall homelessness. This compares to the County overall which saw homelessness decline by 1% or 125 fewer homeless people. These findings are shown in Figure 1 below.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 57
Supplemental Figure 2.
Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness, Santa Clara County, 2022-2023
Source: 2022 and 2023 Point-in-Time (PIT) data.
*Section updates in progress
According to the City’s 2021 HOME-ARP Plan, which includes an analysis of HMIS data for the City, there were a total of 789 homeless individuals in the City of Santa Clara during the 2021 calendar year. Of these individuals, over half (59%) had a disability; 50% were chronically homeless; 34% had experience with domestic violence; and 30% were over 55 years. Nearly one in five (17%) were youth and young adults and 6% were veterans.
Expanding on this analysis, Figure 2 provides County-level data for homeless individuals and households who accessed housing and services between 2022 and 2023. Definitions for Figure 2 are provided below.
Number Experiencing Homelessness Each Year—Unduplicated count of all persons enrolled during the program year;
Number Becoming Homeless Each Year—Unduplicated count of persons appearing in HMIS for the first time during the year;
Number Exiting Homelessness Each Year—Unduplicated count of persons exiting programs to a permanent destination as defined by HUD;
Number of Days Persons Experience Homelessness—Average of the sums of the lengths of stay for each person.
Cupertino 102 48 0 0 102 48 -54 -53%
Gilroy 606 817 208 231 814 1,048 234 29%
Milpitas 249 142 25 0 274 142 -132 -48%
Mountain View 206 424 140 138 346 562 216 62%
Palo Alto 263 187 11 19 274 206 -68 -25%
S anta Clara City 375 417 65 44 440 461 21 5%
S unnyvale 279 320 106 151 385 471 86 22%
S anta Clara County 7,708 7,401 2,320 2,502 10,028 9,903 -125 -1% Pct.2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 Num.
Unsheltered Sheltered Total
I I
t
t
t
~
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 58
.
DATA UPDATE PENDING: Supplemental Figure 3 – Extent of homelessness (Regionally) Data Source: Santa Clara County Homeless Census and Survey
Population
Estimate the # of
persons experiencing
homelessness on
a given night
Estimate the #
experiencing
homelessness
each year
Estimate the #
becoming
homeless
each year
Estimate the #
exiting
homelessness
each year
Estimate the # of
days persons
experience
homelessness
Sheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
Unsheltered
Sheltered
and
Unsheltered
Sheltered
and
Unsheltered
Persons in
Households with
Adult(s) and
Child(ren)
Persons in
Households with
Only Children
Persons in
Households with
Only Adults
Chronically Homeless
Individuals
Chronically Homeless
Families
Veterans
Unaccompanied
Youth
Persons with HIV
Persons with any
disability
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 59
If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth):
The City of Santa Clara filters data from the County’s HMIS to identify and understand the needs of persons and households experiencing homelessness in Santa Clara City—however, the City does not have data on the number of persons becoming and/or exiting homelessness each year. Rather, the City provides data on the homeless population who enter housing and re-enter homelessness within two years of being housed. For example, according to data from the 2021 HMIS database:
Among individuals who regained housing in 2019, a total of 45 individuals with a connection to the City of Santa Clara returned to homelessness within two years. Around half (49%) who returned to homelessness were originally served by and exited from emergency shelter versus a permanent housing program, transitional housing, or street outreach.
A disproportionate share identify as Black of African American with 27% of those who return to homelessness identifying as Black or African American compared to 14% of the overall homeless population who identify as Black or African American.
Young adults (18 to 24) had the highest rates of return to homelessness of all age groups (60% returned), followed by ages 45 to 54 (47% returned), and ages 55 to 64 (32% returned).
To supplement these data, the City has analyzed and summarized the unique characteristics of persons experiencing homelessness in the City of Santa Clara in the 2021 HOME-ARP Plan. Of the 789 homeless persons affiliated with the City in 2021, over half (59%) had a disability; 50% were chronically homeless; 34% had experience with domestic violence; and 30% were over 55 years. Nearly one in five (17%) were youth and young adults and 6% were veterans.
Of the 686 households experiencing homelessness in the City of Santa Clara, most households (76%) were single adults and 20% were families with children. Only 10 households were homeless unaccompanied youth (1%).
The remainder of this section provides greater insight on both the County and City’s homeless populations by sub-group.
Chronically homeless individuals. In the City of Santa Clara, a total of 384 homeless individuals (50%) affiliated with the City who accessed housing and services during calendar year 2021 met the definition of “chronically homeless.” This is a much larger share than chronically homeless persons in Santa Clara County where a total of 3,166 individuals (32% of the total homeless population) were chronically homeless in 2023, representing an overall percentage increase of 12% from 2022.
Sixty-six percent (66%) of homeless persons in Santa Clara County in 2023 reported that they were not 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 60
experiencing homelessness for the first time. Over half (52%) of which reported becoming homeless for the first time between the ages of 25 years and 59 years. Most persons (46%) counted during the 2023 PIT reported experiencing only one episode of homelessness in the past three years while 17% reported experiencing two episodes of homelessness and 15% reported experiencing three episodes of homelessness. When asked the duration of their current episode of homelessness, 65% reported that they had been homeless for over one year; 29% reported being homeless for one month to 11 months; and only 7% reported being homeless for 30 days or less.
Families with children. A total of 137 households experiencing homelessness in 2021 that were affiliated with the City of Santa Clara were families with children under 18 years (20% of total households experiencing homelessness during calendar year 2021). While gaps in housing and services for families with children were identified in the City of Santa Clara, service providers in the city have noted that most homeless persons are adults without children. According to 2021 HMIS data, 79% of Santa Clara City-affiliated households experiencing homelessness were households without children.
In Santa Clara County, a total of 1,226 families with children (365 households) were homeless in 2023.
The majority of families with children were sheltered (81%) during this time. Additionally, between September 2023 and August 2024, there were a total of 549 families with children (31%) enrolled in the County’s rapid re-housing (RRH) programs. Of families enrolled in RRH, 21% self-reported having a mental health disability; 15% a chronic health condition; 8% a substance use disorder; and 4% a developmental disability.
Families with children enrolled in the County’s Homelessness Prevention System (HPS) and Emergency Assistance Network Homelessness Prevention (EAN-HP) programs also provide insight on families experiencing homelessness. According to County-level data, between December 2022 and November 2023, over half (56%) households enrolled in HPS were households with children and 41% enrolled in EAN-HP were households with children.
Veterans. In 2021, a total of 43 veterans in the City of Santa Clara were homeless representing 6% of the City’s total homeless population at the time. A total of 508 veterans (479 households) were counted as experiencing homelessness in Santa Clara County in 2023. Of these households and individuals, 26% were experiencing sheltered homelessness while 74% were living in unsheltered conditions. Though unsheltered homelessness is prominent among veterans, the county has made significant strides in reducing veteran homelessness with a 27% decline in the population of homeless veterans.
Additionally, between September 2023 and August 2024, there were a total of 358 veterans (20%) enrolled in the County’s RRH programs. Veterans were significantly more likely than other target populations to self-report disabilities with 52% reporting a mental health disability followed by a chronic health condition (40%), substance use disorder (23%), and developmental disability (7%).
Unaccompanied youth. In the City of Santa Clara, there were a total of 132 youth and young adults (0 to 24 years) experiencing homelessness in 2021 which represented 17% of the City’s total homeless population during the 2021 calendar year. Of total homeless households during this time, only 1% were unaccompanied youth or 10 homeless unaccompanied youth.
McKinney-Vento data reported by the Santa Clara Unified School District (SCUSD) provides a third data source to illustrate some unique characteristics of school-aged children, and their families, experiencing homelessness. Based on data for the 2020-2021 school year, 127 students in grades K-12 were identified as experiencing homelessness. Of those 127 students, 66% were Hispanic or Latinx, 31% were identified as English Learners, and 25% had one or more disability. During the consultation process for the City’s 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 61
2021 HOME-ARP Plan, the SCUSD McKinney-Vento Liaison identified specific unmet housing, shelter, and service needs for Spanish speaking students and students in need of behavioral health services.
In Santa Clara County, a total of 764 unaccompanied youth (644 households) were experiencing homelessness in 2023. Of unaccompanied youth in the county, only 14% were sheltered while 86% were experiencing unsheltered homelessness. (A much larger share than other unsheltered special needs populations in the county.) Only 12% of homeless persons reported that they were currently in foster care at the time they were experiencing homelessness in Santa Clara County. Additionally, between September 2023 and August 2024, there were a total of 322 youth and youth adults (18%) enrolled in the County’s RRH programs in which 21% self-reported a mental health disability followed by chronic health condition (8%), developmental disability (8%), and substance use disorder (6%).
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans.
Families with children often need housing assistance to avoid displacement, housing instability, and chronic homelessness. According to the County’s HMIS data for the 2021 calendar year, there were a total of 137 families with children (under 18 years) experiencing homelessness in the City of Santa Clara in 2021. The need to provide housing assistance (and other supportive services) to ensure families remain stably housed continues to grow across Santa Clara County, as demonstrated by the 2023 Point- in-Time (PIT) Count. In 2023, there were a total of 365 family households counted as experiencing homelessness (81% of which were sheltered)—these households (particularly those with children and families with extremely low incomes) require housing assistance to keep pace with the rising cost of housing, childcare, and other living expenses.
As previously referenced, in 2021, there were a total of 43 homeless veterans in the City of Santa Clara which represented 6% of the City’s total homeless population. In 2023, the County documented a total of 479 veteran households experiencing homelessness (only 26% of which were sheltered). While the City notes that it is difficult to quantify the exact number of veterans who are unhoused or who are at- risk of being unhoused in the City of Santa Clara, staff use data from a range of programs to estimate the City’s population of homeless and at-risk veterans.
According to program data pulled and provided by Veteran Affairs in January 2023 that serve the County of Santa Clara’s veteran population, there are around 27 veterans with addresses in the City of Santa Clara. Data were provided by VA on the programs and resources available to veterans as of January 24 and 31, 2023 across Santa Clara County. (Note that capacity and program census numbers are not specific to the City—data are provided for County veterans overall.)
As of January 2023, the County’s HUD-VASH program had a total capacity of 1,361 housing choice vouchers (375 of which were open) and 144 project-based vouchers (12 of which were open). Within the Health Care for Homeless Veteran Program (HCHV), the County had a total of 96 emergency shelter beds in which 60% were occupied (58 occupied beds) as of January 2023. Additionally, VA’s HCHV Intensive Case Management (CCP Voucher Program) shows 39 vouchers filled of the 80 vouchers available.
Across the County of Santa Clara, veterans and their families need greater access to permanent supportive housing (PSH) and ongoing rental subsidies. Of veterans enrolled in RRH between September 2023 and August 2024, for example, over half (52%) self-reported having a mental health disability and 40% reported having a chronic health condition. Almost a quarter (23%) self-reported having a substance use disorder and 7% reported having a developmental disability. These disabilities present significant employment and housing barriers for veterans and their families and demonstrate the need to increase access to housing programs that support households with disabilities and those with low 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 62
incomes.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group.
Demographic information collected in the County’s HMIS for City-affiliated households also provides insight on the racial and ethnic composition for Santa Clara City’s homeless population and show homelessness varying by race and ethnicity. Of the 769 homeless persons in 2021, almost half (46% or 352 people) identified as Hispanic or Latino followed by Black or African American individuals (14%), Asian or Asian American individuals (7%), and multi-racial individuals (5%).
Demographic data collected during the 2023 PIT count also provides insight on the nature and extent of homelessness by racial and ethnic group for Santa Clara County overall. According to PIT data for 2023, White residents comprised the largest share of residents experiencing homelessness (sheltered and unsheltered) at 47% of the total homeless population 2023. Individuals identifying as “other” comprised the second largest share (18%) followed by Black residents (15%), multiracial residents (7%), Asian residents (6%), American Indian/Alaska Native residents (4%), and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander residents (3%).
According to HUD’s CoC Analysis tool—which provides homelessness and poverty counts at the CoC and state level by race and ethnicity—racial and ethnic minorities in Santa Clara County are overrepresented among the CoC’s homeless population compared to the total resident population. For example:
Only 2% of the total resident population identify as Black or African American—yet 14% of total homeless persons (including unsheltered persons) identify as Black or African American. These residents also comprise a disproportionate share of families with children experiencing homelessness at 13%.
Only 1% of the total resident population identify as American Indian or Alaska Native—however, 14% of homeless persons (including unsheltered persons) identified as American Indian/Alaska Native. These residents also comprise a disproportionate share of families experiencing unsheltered homelessness at 15%.
Twenty-five percent (25%) of the total resident population identify as Hispanic or Latino—yet 47% of homeless persons identify as Hispanic. Families with children who identify as Hispanic comprise a disproportionate share of families with children experiencing homelessness overall at 70%.
Additionally, over half (55%) homeless youth identified as Hispanic and 16% identified as Black or African American. Of homeless veterans a quarter (25%) identified as Black or African American.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 63
Supplemental Figure 4– Race/Ethnicity of Homeless PENDING DATA UPDATE Data Source: County of Santa Clara Continuum of Care
Race: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional)
White
Black or African American
Asian
American Indian or Alaska Native
Pacific Islander
Multiple Races
Ethnicity: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional)
Hispanic
Not Hispanic
Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness.
There were a total of 9,903 individuals experiencing homelessness in Santa Clara County in January 2023. Of these individuals, 75% were unsheltered (7,401 people) compared to only 25% experiencing sheltered homelessness (2,502 people). In the City of Santa Clara, 90% of homeless persons are unsheltered (417 unsheltered people) which represents 6% of the County’s unsheltered homeless population. This compares to 10% of homeless persons who are sheltered (44 sheltered people) in Santa Clara City which represents 2% of the County’s total sheltered homeless population.
Findings from the survey administered in the weeks following the 2023 PIT Count provides greater insight on the nature and extent of unsheltered and sheltered homelessness in Santa Clara County. For example, when asked where they were staying on the night of January 24, almost one in five (17%) reported that they were living outdoors in streets or parks followed by individuals living in a van (12%), tent (11%), camper/RV (10%), or in their automobile/car (9%).
In the City of Santa Clara, the location of homeless encampments and RV parking regularly shifts. There are concentrations of overnight RV parking in the northern part of the City near Bassett Street, Hope Drive, Memorex Drive, and Richard Avenue with smaller concentrations in other parts of the City near De La Cruz Boulevard and Martin Avenue, Saratoga Avenue and Los Padres Boulevard, and certain portions of Stevens Creek Boulevard. For encampments, there are concentrations on Saratoga Creek from Forbes Avenue, north along the creek to El Camino Real and on the north side of the side, the Guadalupe River trail from Highway 237 down to Trimble Road. Several segments of El Camino Real include unhoused residents camping near vacant buildings. The City’s Housing Element also identifies Calabazas Creek from Tasman Drive to Highway 101 as historically having several encampments.
While individuals are eligible to access shelters countywide, an extremely limited number of beds are available within the City of Santa Clara itself and many of these beds are youth or family dedicated which leaves a significant portion of the City’s homeless population without access to shelters. During consultations to inform the City’s HOME-ARP Plan, City staff heard from individuals with lived experience of homelessness and from local government and service provider partners that there is a need for emergency shelter that keeps people close to local schools, jobs, and home communities.
Additionally, one of the most frequently identified unmet needs for individuals living outside or in vehicles was accessible behavioral healthcare and basic hygiene and sanitation supports for the general unsheltered population within the city.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 64
NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment – 91.205 (c) Introduction:
This section describes the characteristics and the housing and service needs of the special needs populations living in the City of Santa Clara. The special needs populations considered in this section include: elderly persons and households, persons with disabilities, large households, female-headed households, persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families, and survivors of domestic violence.
Elderly persons. Elderly persons are defined by HUD as individuals age 62 and over while elderly households are defined as households that include at least one individual age 62 and over.
According to 2023 American Community Survey (ACS) 1 year estimates, there are a total of 20,909 elderly persons (16% of total residents) living in the City of Santa Clara. The City has a slightly smaller share of elderly persons than Santa Clara County overall where individuals age 62 and over comprised 19% of total residents in 2023.
In the City of Santa Clara, elderly persons experience high rates of poverty. In 2023, residents 60 years and over had an individual poverty rate of 11% and residents 65 years and over had an individual poverty rate of 12%. This is slightly higher than poverty rates for the City overall (10%) and slightly higher than the individual poverty rates for residents of these age groups living in Santa Clara County overall. Because many elderly persons and senior households are retired and live on fixed incomes, they are at an increased risk of housing instability and homelessness especially as housing prices and other costs of living increase. Elderly persons and seniors are also more likely to need access to public transportation as many of these individuals cannot or no longer drive but need access to medical appointments, grocery stores, and other services/facilities.
Persons with disabilities. According to 2023 ACS 1 year estimates, there are 10,981 persons with a disability living in the City of Santa Clara which represents 8% of the total resident population. This is similar to the County overall where persons with a disability comprise 9% of the County’s total resident population (170,388 persons with a disability. Seniors living in the city are significantly more likely than other age groups to have a disability, particularly for residents over 75 years (32%) and for residents between 65 and 74 years (16%). The most common types of disabilities among residents include cognitive disability (25%), ambulatory disability (21%), and independent living disability (18%).
Persons with disabilities face additional housing barriers in the City of Santa Clara and often have limited housing mobility and choice as these households often live on fixed incomes, have fewer opportunities for work, are more likely to experience discrimination in the housing market, and need greater access to affordable and accessible housing that is located near transportation, mainstream services, and community assets. It is important to highlight the types of disabilities that are prominent among the City’s population with a disability as this will have a direct impact on current and future needs and will impact the way in which the City plans to address and respond to changing needs. (See section MA-35 for a discussion on persons with developmental disabilities including their unique housing and service needs.)
Almost a quarter of survey respondents countywide reported having some type of disability. Of these respondents, 30% indicated that their current housing situation does not meet their needs.
Walk/roll-in showers were the most selected improvement needed by 41% of respondents, 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 65
followed by 39% who needed grab bars, 29% who needed ramps, 28% who needed a reserved accessible parking spot by the entrance, and 26% who needed stair lifts.
Large households. Large households are defined by the U.S. Census as households with five persons or more. In the City of Santa Clara, large households comprise 6% of total households (3,069 large households) compared to Santa Clara County overall where large households comprise 10% of total households. Large households tend to face additional housing barriers in Santa Clara City where units that are affordable to these households often do not meet their needs. This causes many households to live in overcrowded conditions and/or to overpay for their housing.
Female-headed households. Female-headed households comprise 7% of total households in Santa Clara City (3,407 female-headed households), according to 2023 ACS 1 year estimates. Of these households, 35% have children under 18 currently living with them (1,176 single mothers). Single female householders (especially single mothers) are more likely than other households to face affordability challenges due to the high cost of housing and childcare and only having one source of income (or lower household incomes). This is evidenced by the extent to which these households experience poverty in the City of Santa Clara: 17% of single female householders were in poverty and 34% of single mothers were in poverty in 2023. This compares to 6% of all families and only 5% of married couple families.
Persons living with HIV/AIDS. Persons living with HIV/AIDS have a need for consistent access to medical care and supportive services which requires that households have access to stable and affordable housing, preferably within proximity to public transit and/or proximity to supportive services or medical facilities. Supportive service needs for persons living with HIV/AIDS include transportation to medical appointments, assistance programs to subsidize care, and navigation services to connect individuals and families to mainstream health services and family counseling.
Persons with HIV/AIDS also need employment services to support financial stability and economic mobility. (Of homeless persons with HIV/AIDS who participated in the PIT survey, 25% reported that their illness impacts their housing and/or employment situation.) In Santa Clara County in 2023, there are 3,922 cases of HIV/AIDS with new 171 cases reported during the year.7
Survivors of domestic violence. The County’s HMIS data for calendar year 2021 show that 262 unhoused persons (34% of the City’s homeless population) with connections to the City of Santa Clara were survivors of domestic violence or trafficking. Data also show the number of households with domestic violence experience who sought out and received support for acute housing instability in 2021. Additionally, HMIS data for calendar year 2021 show a total of 82 individuals with a connection to the City of Santa Clara who reported they were fleeing domestic violence.
Most of these individuals (76%) were women and 70% of households were adults without children.
California state-wide data on human trafficking from the National Human Trafficking Hotline indicates 1,334 identified cases of human trafficking involving 2,122 survivors. Of those cases, 1,023 were related to sex trafficking, 131 were related to labor trafficking, and 63 cases involved both sex and labor trafficking. For cases statewide in which demographic information was collected, 86% were female and 80% were adults 18 or older.
Local service providers for people who are fleeing domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking report that housing instability and housing loss are extremely common for this population. Many survivors have experienced financial abuse, leading to poor credit, low or no
7 7 Santa Clara County Public Health. 2023 HIV and STI data | Public Health | County of Santa Clara 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 66
income, and lack of employment history. In many cases, the person who is causing the harm is more financially stable than the person attempting to flee, so separating from an unsafe situation is often the primary cause of housing loss. When a perpetrator of violence is removed from the home, that may result in a loss of household income that leads to housing loss. Past evictions that resulted from violence in the home can be a barrier to survivors applying for housing after fleeing.
Persons with addictions and/or a mental illness. In 2021, a total of 29 individuals affiliated with the City of Santa Clara sought out and received support for acute housing instability indicated that they had a behavioral health condition (14% of total individuals). In Santa Clara City, and across Santa Clara County, persons with addictions and persons with a mental illness are at an increased risk of homelessness and housing instability as many individuals lack access to the supportive housing and services they need to remain stably housed.
According to the PIT survey, for example, 143 homeless persons (14%) reported that the primary reason or condition that led to them becoming homeless was “alcohol or drug use” and 64 people (6%) reported that “mental health issues” led to them becoming homeless. When asked what might have prevented them from becoming homeless, 256 homeless persons (25%) said “mental health services” and 183 people (18%) said “alcohol/drug counseling.” While the need for housing and services among this population is high, results from the 2023 PIT survey show low utilization rates among homeless persons in Santa Clara County with only 88 people (9%) accessing mental health services. This compares to 219 homeless persons (22%) who are not using any services.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 67
NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) This section assesses non -housing community development needs, largely informed by stakeholder consultation and the community survey. A complete survey analysis and overview of community engagement including stakeholder consultation is provided in the Appendix.
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities:
Respondents were asked to select the most critical community and e conomic development needs that included public facilities, public improvement and public services. Public facilities related options were overall selected less frequently than public service related options and ranked as follows among the 26 choices provided:
#8: Food Pantries
#11: Senior centers
#16: Recreation centers
#19: Developed parks/playgrounds
Respondents were also asked to indicate the community development outcomes that they would like to see as a result of HUD funding. The figure below shows the ranking of all options provided with public facilities being slightly more prioritized with childcare centers and senior centers ranking in the top 5 for respondents from Santa Clara City only:
Supplemental Figure 5: Community Development Outcomes.
Source: 2024 Santa Clara County Resident and Stakeholder Survey.
Note: Data includes only respondents from Santa Clara City.
Increased access to mental healthcare services
Transportation services for seniors
Additional and/or higher quality childcare centers
Sidewalk and streetlight improvements
New/improved senior center
Increased access to addiction treatment services
Improved access to fresh food
More recreation opportunities for youth/special
populations
New/improved community center
Improvements to parks and recreation centers
Public resource navigation assistance for residents
Climate resilience-focused planning
Increased access to internet services
Counseling for landlord-tenant issues
35%
31%
29%
29%
26%
25%
24%
23%
22%
22%
21%
19%
18%
16%
New/improved nonprofit space - 16%
Other ■ 5%
Unsure I 3%
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 68
Additionally, residents were asked to indicate housing outcomes they would like to see in the city as a result of the HUD funding. Related to public facilities, shelter for people who are unhoused ranked 5th among the housing options provided indicating strong community support for prioritizing funds towards solutions for homelessness in Santa Clara City.
In community meetings and stakeholder focus groups, stakeholders emphasized the need for nonprofit facilities, community centers, and youth centers, which were frequently mentioned as essential for fostering social connections and providing key services. Participants highlighted the importance of improving childcare infrastructure, including affordable and accessible childcare options, as well as creating safe spaces for LGBTQ+ individuals, seniors, and youth. Enhancements to public spaces, such as improved trails, parks, and ecological design were also prioritized with calls for better walkability, bike and pedestrian infrastructure, and ADA-compliant facilities.
How were these needs determined?
Survey respondents were asked to identify the City’s top community development and economic development needs as well as community development, economic development and housing outcomes they would like to see as a result of HUD funding.
In the community and stakeholder workshops that were held to support the Consolidated Plan, attendees shared their perceptions of top needs through facilitated discussions and interactive activities.
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements:
Similar to public facilities options, survey respondents’ ranking for public improvements were not selected as frequently as public services in response to identifying the most critical community and economic development needs in Santa Clara City. The ranking for public improvement related options for Santa Clara City among the 26 choices offered is:
#6: Access to reliable public transportation
#7: Streets for People, accessible for biking, rolling, walking #10: Neighborhood Cleanups
#14: Sidewalks, streetlights and other neighborhood improvements #21: Climate resilience-focused planning and implementation #23: Local renewable energy generation
#25: Environmental hazard mitigation
Additionally, through the stakeholder and resident community workshops, improvements to lighting and sidewalks especially near parks in Santa Clara City was specifically mentioned.
How were these needs determined?
Survey respondents were asked to identify the City’s top community development and economic development needs as well as community development, economic devel opment and housing outcomes they would like to see as a result of HUD funding.
In the community and stakeholder workshops that were held to support the Consolidated Plan, attendees 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 69
shared their perceptions of top needs through facilitated discussions and interactive activities.
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services:
Among Santa Clara City respondents, public services ranked the highest in response to community and economic development needs and community development outcomes that residents would like to see as a result of the HUD block grant funding. The ranking of public services among 26 community and economic development options were as follows:
#1: Affordable childcare
#2: Mental health services
#3: Services for persons who are currently unhoused
#4. Supportive services for low-income residents, persons living with disabilities, LGBTQIA+ people #5: Transportation services for seniors
#9: Job training
#12: Youth activities
#13: Public resource navigation assistance
Public service related community development outcomes priorities as shown previously included:
#1: Mental health services
#2: Transportation services for seniors
#6: Addiction treatment services
#7: Food access assistance
#8: Youth activities
Stakeholder feedback highlighted the importance of mental health services, legal assistance, and homelessness prevention, particularly for seniors, transition-age youth, and unhoused families. Attendees noted the need for expanded domestic violence services, including shelters and education programs, and support for immigrants, such as language services, citizenship classes, and navigation assistance for new arrivals. Case management, housing navigation, and rental assistance were also mentioned as critical tools to keep vulnerable populations housed. There was also a focus on senior and youth services. Broader calls included improving access to multi -language services, addressing tenant -landlord issues, and ensuring support systems for LGBTQ+ individuals and veterans. Stakeholders also indicated that limited dental and vision screening services exist across the county for low income residents is having an impact on children’s ability to succeed in school.
Related to public service needs, survey respondents were also asked which economic development outcomes they would like to see as a result of the funding among 5 options provided with the following ranking by frequency of selection:
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 70
Supplemental Figure 6: Economic Development Outcomes.
Community feedback from the 3 stakeholder virtual workshops highlighted the need for robust support in education access, job training, and skill development, with calls for programs that enhance economic mobility and create better job opportunities. A strong emphasis was placed on small business development, including access to microbusiness assistance, business grants, and loans, particularly for minority-owned and start -up enterprises. Participants advocated for expanding resources like adult education, financial literacy, and professional development, with targeted support for underserved communities, such as Spanish -speaking programs and services for LGBTQ+ individuals and immigrants.
Consideration of hours that programs are offered to accommodate f ull time workers wishing to upskill was also referenced as a barrier to accessing workforce development programs in the county.
In the resident workshop, a Spanish speaking resident in Santa Clara City reiterated the need for more job training opportunities as a step towards securing a job with requisite income to live in the City . The resident indicated that the community is not aware of existing programs offered in the area and improved outreach is needed.
Lastly, throughout the engagement process, a greater need for regional collaboration and sharing of best practices between local jurisdiction staff and nonprofit service providers was repeatedly referenced as critical to effectively targeting public improvement and service needs . With limited resources and significant need, stakeholders indicated that increased opportunities for convening to share information would maximize opportunities and result in greater impact directed where it is most needed across the region.
How were these needs determined?
Survey respondents were asked to identify the City’s top community development and economic development needs as well as community development, economic development and housing outcomes they would like to see as a result of HUD funding.
Job training programs
Revitalization of neighborhood
businesses/commercial areas
Improved transportation to areas with job
opportunities
39%
37%
35%
More opportunities for small or start-up -
businesses 31 %
Center for seasonal and day laborers - 28%
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 71
In the community and stakeholder workshops that were held to support the Consolidated Plan, attendees shared their perceptions of top needs through facilitated discussions and interactive activities. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 72
Housing Market Analysis
MA-5 Overview
Housing Market Analysis Overview:
To support the City of Santa Clara’s Consolidated Plan, a regional and jurisdictional housing market analysis was conducted. That study is appended to the Plan. Primary findings are summarized here.
The balance of this section reviews housing stock, affordability, provision of publicly assisted housing, the housing needs of special populations, barriers to affordable housing development, in addition to needs for broadband service and displacement risks caused by natural hazards.
Primary Housing Market Analysis Findings
The City of Santa Clara’s commitment to affordability is found in its housing production, diverse housing types, and support for affordable housing. Between 2013 and 2023, the City of Santa Clara ranked in the middle among other entitlement jurisdictions in the county for housing unit production with a 14% increase in housing units above Palo Alto, Cupertino , Sunnyvale, same as Mountain View and less than Gilroy and Milpitas. From 2018 to 2023, the City added units at a slightly slower pace, increasing units by 9%, but still higher than neighboring communities. The City of Santa Clara has a diverse housing stock by type with one of the largest shares of multifamily housing and lower share of single family detached housing.
Among neighboring communities in North County, Santa Clara City housing prices are at the “lower” range although extremely high relative to the State of California. Between 2018 and 2023, median renter income surpassed rent increases: renter income rose by 44% while rents rose by 32%. Although home values rose more slowly than rents, the income required to afford homeownership increased by 55%, primarily due to high interest rates.
Rental Market
The median rent in Santa Clara City, as of 2023, was $2,837 per month according to the American Community Survey (ACS). Costar, which tracks rents for larger multifamily properties, reports a higher median of $3,114. Median contract rent increased by 109% between 2010 and 2023, according to data required by HUD. Median gross rent increased by 35% between 2018 and 2023.
Renters are more likely than owners to report living with at least one housing condition:8 37% of renter households live with at least one condition, compared to 23% of all owner households. Based on American Community Survey 5 year estimates for 2018 and 2023, renters in Santa Clara City are also more likely to be cost burdened, as shown below. Cost burden has decreased slightly since 2018, despite rising housing costs, which suggests some displacement of lower and moderate income households for higher income households who can manage rising costs.
8 Housing conditions are (1) lacks complete plumbing facilities, (2) lacks complete kitchen facilities, (3) more than one person per room, and (4) cost burden greater than 30%.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 73
Supplemental Figure 7. Cost Burden
Source: 2018 ACS 5 year estimates, 2023 ACS 5 year estimates.
Rental gaps—which occur when demand from renter households outweighs the supply of affordable rental units—exists for renters until they have incomes of $50,000 and higher (approximately 30% AMI).
The City of Santa Clara needs 5,229 rental units or subsidies affordable to renters with incomes of less than $50,000: there are 6,241 renters with incomes under $50,000 and 1,013 units affordable to them.
Households earning up to $50,000/year must often rent higher priced units, becoming cost burdened and putting pressure on the supply of units at higher price points. Cumulatively, shortages in affordable rental units affect households earning up to and more than $75,000.
North County respondents (majority Santa Clara City) to the resident survey who reported being displaced within the past 5 years indicated that high and increasing rents were the primary reason for displacement followed by eviction for being behind on rent signaling a critical need for more affordable rental opportunities and rental assistance to prevent eviction. Twenty-four percent of North Santa Clara County resident respondents indicated they had been displaced within the past 5 years.
■ Cost Burden (30-49%)
45%
38%
2018 2023
Renter Households
■ Severe Cost Burden (50%+)
27%
21%
2018 2023
Owner Households
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 74
Supplemental Figure 8. Rental Affordability Gap, Santa Clara City, 2023
Source: 2023 5-year ACS and Root Policy Research.
For Sale Market
In 2024, the median for sale home price in the City of Santa Clara was approximately $1.5 million. As shown in the figure below, the City of Santa Clara has median home prices that are similar to the County and lower than many of the neighboring communities except for Milpitas, but higher than the state of California.
Supplemental Figure 9. Typical Home Price Trends, Santa Clara County and Jurisdictions, 2004 through 2024
Source: Zillow Research and Root Policy Research.
Losses in purchase affordability due to rising prices and interest rates in the past five years have significantly limited accessibility of homeownership for the county’s workforce. The City’s homeownership rate has decreased by 2 percentage points between 2018 and 2023.
Rental Gaps
Income Range
Maximum
Affordable
Gross Rent
# of Renter
Households
# of Rental
Units
Affordable Rental Gap
Cumulative
Gap
Less than $5,000 $125 878 25 -853 -853
$5,000 to $9,999 $250 558 25 -533 -1,386
$10,000 to $14,999 $375 406 37 -369 -1,755
$15,000 to $19,999 $500 1,109 67 -1,042 -2,797
$20,000 to $24,999 $625 464 116 -348 -3,145
$25,000 to $34,999 $875 1,142 188 -954 -4,100
$35,000 to $49,999 $1,250 1,684 555 -1,129 -5,229
$50,000 to $74,999 $1,875 1,925 2,672 747 -4,482
$75,000 to $99,999 $2,500 2,651 5,469 2,818 -1,664
$100,000 or more 13,610 21,417 7,807 6,143
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
Sunnyvale
Mountain View
Santa Clara
Santa Clara County
SanJoseMilpitas
Gilroy
California
United States
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 75
As shown in the table below, purchase affordability gaps—which occur when demand from potential first-time homebuyers outweighs the supply of affordable homes for sale—exist for renters until they have incomes exceeding $150,000. An estimated 63% of Santa Clara City’s potential first-time homebuyers earn less than $150,000, but less than 3% of owner-occupied units are valued within their affordable price range. Due to data limitations, it is not possible to show mismatches in supply and demand at higher income levels.
Supplemental Figure 10. Renter Purchase Affordability Gap, Santa Clara City, 2023
Source: 2023 5-year ACS and Root Policy Research.
Renter Purchase Gaps
Income Range
Maximum
Affordable
Price
% of Renter
Households
% of
Homes
Affordable
Renter
Purchase
Gap
Cumulative
Gap
Less than $5,000 $14,023 3.6% 1.1% -2.5% -2.5%
$5,000 to $9,999 $28,043 2.3% 0.1% -2.2% -4.7%
$10,000 to $14,999 $42,066 1.7% 0.0% -1.6% -6.3%
$15,000 to $19,999 $56,089 4.5% 0.0% -4.5% -10.9%
$20,000 to $24,999 $70,112 1.9% 0.0% -1.9% -12.8%
$25,000 to $34,999 $98,158 4.7% 0.0% -4.7% -17.4%
$35,000 to $49,999 $140,227 6.9% 0.4% -6.5% -23.9%
$50,000 to $74,999 $210,342 7.9% 0.2% -7.7% -31.6%
$75,000 to $99,999 $280,458 10.9% 0.4% -10.5% -42.1%
$100,000 to $149,999 $420,688 18.7% 0.5% -18.2% -60.2%
$150,000 or more 37.1% 97.3% 60.2%
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 76
MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210 (a) (b)(2)
Between 2013 and 2023, the City of Santa Clara ranked in the middle of neighboring entitlement communities in the number of housing units added, with a 14% increase in housing units. From 2018 to 2023, the pace of housing unit production slowed slightly to 9%.
Supplemental Figure 11. Housing Units, County and Participating Jurisdictions, 2013-2023
Source: 2013, 2018, 2022, and 2023 ACS, and Root Policy Research.
As demonstrated by the figure below, the City of Santa Clara has a high inventory of multifamily buildings with 20+ units at 31% and is on the low end among jurisdictions for inventory of single family detached homes. The City has a lower volume of lower density housing types such as duplex/triplex housing units, however, overall has a balanced portfolio of housing types.
J urisdiction 2013-2023 2018-2023
Santa Clara County 642,654 678,530 703,922 10% 4%
San J ose 319,700 334,350 340,392 6% 2%
Participating Cities
Cupertino 21,473 21,788 21,917 2% 1%
Gilroy 15,024 16,585 17,644 17% 6%
Milpitas 20,744 23,574 25,252 22% 7%
Mountain View 33,468 35,903 38,230 14% 6%
Palo Alto 27,789 27,753 29,065 5% 5%
Santa Clara (city) 44,632 46,485 50,805 14% 9%
Sunnyvale 56,168 58,915 61,519 10% 4%
Urban County 97,192 100,012 103,463 6% 3%
Campbell 16,616 17,819 18,341 10% 3%
Los Altos 11,493 11,040 11,685 2% 6%
Los Altos Hills 3,052 3,356 3,454 13% 3%
Los Gatos 13,102 12,925 13,765 5% 6%
Monte Sereno 1,259 1,251 1,347 7% 8%
Morgan Hill 13,133 15,070 15,054 15% 0%
Saratoga 11,324 11,417 11,473 1% 0%
Unincorporated 27,213 27,134 28,344 4% 4%
California 13,791,262 14,277,867 14,762,527 7% 3%
United States 132,808,137 138,539,906 145,333,462 9% 5% Total Housing Units Housing Unit Change
2013 2018 2022/23
Unit Change Chart
0% 10% 20% 30%
2013-2023 2018-2023
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 77
Supplemental Figure 12. Housing Units by Structure Type, Participating Jurisdictions and Urban County Communities, 2022/23
Source: 2022 and 2023 ACS and Root Policy Research.
All residential properties by number of units
Table 31 – Residential Properties by Unit Number
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates.
Property Type Number Percentage (%)
1-unit detached structure 19,293 37%
1-unit, attached structure 5,565 11%
2-4 units 3,892 8%
5-19 units 7,850 15%
20 or more units 15,177 29%
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc. 109 0%
Total 51,886 100%
Unit Size by Tenure
Santa Clara City homeowners are most likely to live in larger homes (80% live in units with 3 or more bedrooms), while renters are most likely to occupy 1 -2 bedroom units (31% live in 1 bedroom and 41% live in 2 bedroom units).
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
■ Single Family Detached
Multifamily: 5-9 units
■ Mobile Home
■ Multifamily: 10-20 units
Participating Cities
■ Townhome ■ Du-/Tri-/Four-plex
■ Multifamily: 20+ units
Urban County
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 78
Table 32 – Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates.
Owners Renters
Number % Number %
No bedroom 118 1% 3,066 11%
1 bedroom 594 3% 8,802 31%
2 bedrooms 3,323 17% 11,795 41%
3 or more bedrooms 15,991 80% 4,912 17%
Total 20,026 100% 28,575 100%
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.
SCCHA Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program serves those between 0%-30% AMI and 30%-50% AMI.
SCCHA owns seven affordable housing projects within the City, including:
Bracher Senior Housing, a 72-unit senior housing complex for seniors under 50% AMI; Deborah Drive Apartments, a four-unit public housing complex for families under 30% AMI; Eklund Garden Apartments, a 16-unit apartment complex for those under 30% AMI; John Burns Garden Apartments, a 100-unit senior housing complex for seniors under 50% AMI; Klamath Gardens Apartments, a 17-unit apartment complex for families under 50% AMI; Miramar Way Apartments, a 16-unit apartment complex for families under 50% AMI; and Rivertown Apartments, a 100-unit apartment complex for families under 60% AMI.
Additionally, according to the 2023-2031 Housing Element, the City of Santa Clara has 233 units of housing targeted to extremely low-income residents (less than 30% AMI) in the following buildings:
Monroe Apartments, 16 units
Calabazas Apartments, 80 units
Mainline North, 16 units
Agrihood, 54 units
Kifer Senior, 39 units
Peacock Commons, 10 units
Belovida Senior Apartments, 9 units
Cypress Apartments, 5 units
Presidio el Camino Apartments, 4 units
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 79
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.
According to the City’s 2024 Housing Element, there are four assisted rental projects, with a total of 45 units in Santa Clara are identified to be at potential, albeit very low, risk of conversion to market rate use between June 2028 and October 2031. The following objectives outlined in the City’s Housing Element support the City’s goal of conserving 87 affordable units which include “naturally occurring affordable housing” units (44 in higher income, higher resourced, and lower density neighborhoods):
a) Continue to assist property owners of income restricted housing to make periodic capital improvements to their property, to improve energy efficiency and to extend affordability.
b) Continue to monitor and analyze inventory of income restricted projects/units that may be at-risk of losing affordability controls and maintain contact every four years with the property owners regarding long-term plans for their projects.
c) Maintain contact with public and nonprofit agencies (qualified entities) every two years, such as the Sobrato Family Foundation, BRIDGE Housing, and MidPen Housing that have expressed interest in purchasing, managing, or financing the acquisition of at-risk units.
d) Explore new funding sources that can be used for preservation from the Bay Area Housing Finance Authority (BAHFA) and other state sources by attending at least two related meetings or webinars per year.
e) Work with owners of at-risk income restricted housing to restructure City loans in exchange for extended affordability restrictions when appropriate.
f) When an at-risk project is identified, work with the property owner to provide tenants with information regarding tenant rights and conversion procedures, including the property owner requirement to provide a minimum 12-month notice of intent if they choose to opt out of low-income use restrictions.
g) By the end of 2024, develop a list of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) locations and meet with at least three property owners to facilitate possible connections between sellers, affordable housing developers, and funding sources.
h) In 2025, 2027, and 2029, monitor the risk of conversion of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) by contacting owners of the three highest risk properties to determine their intentions and continue to coordinate with qualified entities regarding the conversion of NOAH to income-restricted affordable housing.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population?
There is currently a 5,228-unit gap for renter households between 0%-30% AMI. Throughout the community engagement outreach for this Consolidated Plan, stakeholders and residents referenced 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 80
affordable housing for extremely low and low income residents as the highest priority as a preventative strategy for increasing numbers of homeless residents across the county.
Describe the need for specific types of housing:
As discussed in the Needs Assessment, those in need of affordable housing include people at -risk of homelessness, homeless individuals, seniors, people living with HIV/AIDS, people with disabilities. As identified throughout the City’s community engagement efforts, there is an urgent need fo r homeless shelters, transitional housing and emergency funds and/or legal and emergency financial assistance to prevent eviction.
Discussion
There is a significant need for affordable housing units within the City and especially for people with special needs, including the elderly, disabled, large households, and people living with HIV/AIDS. Several past CDBG and HOME funded projects and activities have addressed these needs through service providers including Catholic Charities, Santa Clara Senior Center Nutrition Program, Neighborhood Conservation and Improvement Program, Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley, and Tenant Based Rental Assistance.
The City’s 2023 -2031 Housing Element outlines quantitative goals for increasing affordable housi ng inventory in the City specifically in higher opportunity areas:
650 units Constructed (325 units by 2028)
150 units Rehabilitated (75 units by 2028)
44 units Conserved (22 units by 2028)
As part of the goal of constructing 650 units, rehabilitating 150 units, and conserving 44 units for affordable housing development, the City seeks to assist at least 125 individuals through actions that facilitate affordable housing development on religious/faith-based sites, adaptive reuse of hotels/motels along transit corridors in proximity to services for affordable or interim housing, affordable home sharing, increasing the density limit for Very Low Density Residential parcels and through additional naturally occurring affordable units on single-family zoned properties such as ADUs and SB 9 projects.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 81
MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing – 91.210 (a) Introduction
The City of Santa Clara is among a group of neighboring communities comprising the North County who host the highest home values and rents in the region. In the North County, the City’s median home values are higher than Milpitas, but lower than Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Mountain View, and Cupertino and roughly similar to the overall County median value. As shown in the figure below, between 2018 and 2023, median renter income actually surpassed rising rental costs: renter income rose by 44% while rents rose by 32%.
The reality of r ising costs of everyday necessities and energy costs coupled with displacement of lower income renters in the City, however, necessitate caution in concluding that the City is affordable to all households based on income and rental data alone. Although home values rose more slowly than rents, the income required to afford homeownership increased by 55%, primarily due to high interest rates , making homeownership out of reach for most renter households . Additionally, rising home insurance rates due to climate change related risk will continue to exacerbate the lack of homeownership affordability in Santa Clara City and regionally.
Supplemental Figure 13. Median Income and Housing Cost 2018-2023.
Source: 2018 and 2013 ACS 5 year estimates.
Percent Change in Median Income vs. Percent Change in Rent/Home Costs, 2018-2023
Median contract rent increased by 110% between 2010 and 2023, according to data required by HUD.
Median gross rent increased by 32% between 2018 and 2023. The vast majority of rental units rent for more than $2,000 per month.
In 2024, the median for sale home price in Santa Clara City was $1.5 million. As previously mentioned, Santa Clara City’s median home value, although extremely high, is actually lower than the median home values of neighboring jurisdictions and similar to the median for the County.
Santa Clara (city)
• Median Median Median Typical Income
Household Renter Gross Home Required
Income Income Rent, ACS Value to Afford
(ZHVI) ZHVI
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 82
Cost of Housing
Table 33 – Cost of Housing
Data Source: ACS 2010 5 year estimates (Base Year), ACS 2023 5 year estimates (Most Recent Year) Base Year: 2010 Most Recent Year: 2023 % Change
Median Home Value $643,800 $1,527,900 137%
Median Contract Rent $1,356 $2,857 110%
Table 34 – Rent Paid
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
Rent Paid Number %
Less than $500 228 0.81%
$500-999 501 1.77%
$1,000-1,499 1,262 4.46%
$1,500-1,999 2,699 9.55%
$2,000 or more 23,581 83.41%
Total 28,271 100.00%
Housing Affordability
Table 35 – Housing Affordability
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
% Units affordable to Households earning Renter Owner
30% HAMFI 710 No Data
50% HAMFI 2,650 150
80% HAMFI 7,405 230
100% HAMFI No Data 369
Total 10,765 749
Monthly Rent
Table 36 – Monthly Rent
Data Source: HUD FMR & HOME Rents
Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no bedroom) 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom Fair Market Rent 2,223 2,513 2,941 3,750 4,202
High HOME Rent 1,611 1,728 2,074 2,389 2,645
Low HOME Rent 1,281 1,372 1,646 1,902 2,122
Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels?
The rental affordability gap conducted to support the Consolidated Plan found that the City of Santa Clara needs 5,228 rental units affordable to renters with incomes of less than $50,000: there are 6,241 renters with incomes under $50,000 and 1,013 units affordable to them and therefore sufficient housing 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 83
does not exist for households at all income levels.
Purchase affordability gaps—which occur when demand from potential first-time homebuyers outweighs the supply of affordable homes for sale—exist for renters until they have incomes exceeding $150,000. An estimated 63% of Santa Clara City’s potential first-time homebuyers earn less than $150,000, but approximately 3% of owner-occupied units are valued within their affordable price range.
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents? Rising housing costs continue to outpace household income growth within the City. The City anticipates that the cost of market-rate housing will continue to increase with the strong economy within the Silicon Valley region, which has led to household growth outpacing the production of new housing units and additional upward pressure on housing costs.
How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?
The Fair Market Rent and the area median rent are comparable. This allows Housing Choice Voucher holders to rent properly sized units.
Discussion
Area median rents and home prices have risen significantly in the last 10 years; however, median income has not risen in proportion. Voucher allocations have increased to cope with rising prices. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 84
MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210 (a) HUD defines housing “conditions” similarly to the definition of housing problems previously discussed in the Needs Assessment. These conditions are:
1. More than one person per room
2. Cost burden greater than 30%
3. Lack of complete plumbing
4. Lack of complete kitchen facilities
Definitions
The City defines substandard housing consistent with the State of California:
According to the California Health and Safety Code, Division 13, Part 1.5 Regulation of Buildings Used for Human Habitation, a Substandard Building is one where there exists any of the conditions listed in section 17920.3 to an extent that endangers the life, limb, health, property, safety, or welfare of the public or the occupants thereof.
Condition of Units
Most of Santa Clara City’s housing stock is in good condition with three quarters of owners and 58% of renters reporting no negative conditions which is positive given the age of housing . Renters are more likely than owners to occupy housing units with condition challenges, with 37% in units with one condition and 5% in units with two conditions, compared to 24% of owners.
The City of Santa Clara has a large inventory of older housing units with three-quarters of owned units and half of rental units b eing built before 1980 . These units have the highest risk of lead based paint hazards. Data was not available to estimate the presence of children in these units. Interviews with Rebuilding Together, a regional housing rehabilitation nonprofit serving Sa nta Clara City, indicated that the need for lead remediation is often identified when evaluating applications for home rehabilitation assistance and substantial cost and few qualified contractors in the region.
Condition of Units
Table 37 – Condition of Units
Data Source: Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
With one selected Condition 4,550 23% 10,430 37%
With two selected Conditions 101 1% 1,430 5%
With three selected Conditions 75 0% 179 1%
With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
No selected Conditions 15,300 76% 16,536 58%
Total 20,026 100% 28,575 100%
Year Unit Built
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 85
Table 38 – Year Unit Built
Data Source: Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
2000 or later` 2,958 15% 8,696 30%
1980-1999 1,867 9% 5,459 19%
1950-1979 13,485 67% 12,657 44%
Before 1950 1,716 9% 1,763 6%
Total 20,026 100% 28,575 100%
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Table 39 – Risk of Lead Based Paint
Data Source: Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates (Total units) Risk of Lead-based Paint Hazards Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number %
Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 15,201 76% 14,420 50% Housing Units built before 1980 with children
present NA NA
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 86
Vacant Units
Table 40 – Vacant Units
Data Source: Data Source: ACS 2011-2015
Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Not Suitable for
Rehabilitation Total
Vacant Units 3,285
Abandoned Vacant Units
REO Properties
Abandoned REO Properties
Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation
The City’s 2023 -2031 Housing Element identified a much lower need for rehabilitation than new construction of affordable housing with an estimate of only 10 units needing rehabilitation per year.
Low to moderate income seniors and residents with disabilities living on fixed incomes, however, have a considerable need for rehabilitation assistance. There are approximately 121 frail elderly households in the City of Santa Clara who could have needs for accessibility improvements based on their poverty rate.
There are a total of 1,505 residents with a hearing or vision impairment; and 1,645 with an ambulatory limitation—all of which could have rehabilitation needs.
Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low or Moderate Income Families with LBP Hazards Building age is used to estimate the number of homes with lead‐based paint (LBP), as LBP was prohibited for use on residential units built after 1978. For the purposes of this plan, units built before 1980 are used as a baseline for units that contain LBP. According to HUD data, 76% of owner-occupied units (or 15,201 units) and 50% of renter-occupied units (14,420 units) were built before 1980. Data on children present is not available. These owners and renters, especially those who are lower income, have the highest risk of lead based paint hazards. It is important to note that many of these potential LBP units have been substantially rehabilitated where lead and other hazards were abated as part of that process, but the exact number of abated LBP units i s uncertain. Rebuilding Together, the region’s housing rehabilitation nonprofit service provider, indicated in stakeholder interviews that approximately 12 homes test positive and need remediation per year with high associated cost. They shared that most homes in the region that are positive for lead paint were built in the 1950’s.
The City has an LBP Management Plan and carries out projects according to this plan. The City requires testing and hazard reduction in properties that use CDBG or HOME rehabi litation funds where lead and other risks may be present. The City also provides information about the risk of LBP to property owners. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 87
MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210 (b)
Introduction
As discussed in the Needs Assessment, SCCHA administers federal rental assistance programs through the Section 8 Voucher Program. These programs are targeted to low-, very low-, and extremely low-income households, more than 80% of which are extremely low-income families, seniors, veterans, persons with disabilities, and formerly homeless individuals. SCCHA currently owns and manages 36 properties with a total of 2700 housing units across Santa Clara County. Information on public housing units and vouchers for Santa Clara City is detailed in the table below.
Totals Number of Units
Table 41 – Total Number of Units by Program Type
Data Source: Santa Clara County Housing Authority, January 2025
Certificate
Mod- Rehab
Public Housing Vouchers
Total
Project-
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled*
# of units vouchers
available 0 0 4 NA 236 NA NA NA NA
# of accessible
units 0 NA 0 NA 49 NA NA NA NA
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Describe the supply of public housing developments:
In 2008, SCCHA was designated a Moving to Work (MTW) agency. The MTW program is a federal demonstration program that allows greater flexibility to design and implement more innovative approaches for providing housing assistance. Through this designation, SCCHA has used Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) financing to transform and rehabilitate its public housing units. There are only four public housing units in the County as all properties have been RAD transitioned over the years.
SCCHA operates four two-bedroom public housing units in the City of Santa Clara and those are the only remaining traditional public housing units within the County.
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan:
As displayed in Table 45 below, the average inspection score for the fou r public housing units was 96 in 2017. This is a high average score, indicating that the units are in good condition.
Public Housing Condition
Table 42 – Public Housing Condition
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 88
Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score
Deborah Drive Apartments 96
Deborah Drive Apartments which comprise 4 units are the only public housing rem aining in the SCCHA inventory and received a high inspection score when last inspected in 2017.
Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction:
SCCHA no longer has any traditional public housing buildings in its inventory, but only the 4 units previously referenced. Properties that have been RAD converted have received considerable rehabilitation and SCCHA has a capital improvement fund to address any new restoration and revitalization needs across properties and seek input from residents on needed improvements through a survey conducted every 3 years.
Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low- and moderate-income families residing in public housing:
SCCHA has been an MTW agency since 2008. In this time the agency has developed 60 MTW activities.
As previously indicated in the Needs Assessment section of this plan, the majority of successful initiatives have been aimed at reducing administrative inefficiencies, which produce more resources for programs aimed at assisting LMI families. SCCHA conducts resident surveys every 3 years to determine needs, experiences, and program suggestions of voucher participants across the county. Additionally, 2 residents are included on the SCCHA Board of Commissioners.
An example of such a program is SCCHA’s Family Self Sufficiency (FSS) Program designed to provide assistance to current SCCHA Section 8 families to achieve self‐sufficiency. As per the SCCHA. “the FSS program provides case management and advocacy to current program participants in order to help them attain self-sufficiency goals. Families enroll and sign a five-year contract to participate in the program. After enrolling in the program, participants set goals such as finishing their education, obtaining job training, and/or employment. During the contract term, participants who increase their earned income can receive cash bonuses. When the family reports an increase in earned income, SCCHA calculates a monthly bonus amount that is deposited into an ‘escrow’ account which the family can receive upon program graduation. Families eligible for the FSS program are those receiving SCCHA assistance through the HCV program and the program is both free and voluntary.
Another program, as referenced in the Needs Assessment section of the plan is the Housing Mobility Pilot project that SCCHA is in the process of launching. This program will provide housing opportunities for families enrolled in the Housing Choice Voucher program to move to higher opportunity areas across the county. Higher opportunity areas include those that are higher income with better performing schools and increased access to job opportunities. Participants in the program will receive security deposit assistance, housing search assistance and counseling. One hundred families will be selected to participate in the initial pilot program.
Discussion:
See above.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 89
MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210 (c)
Introduction
This section describes the mainstream and targeted services and resources available persons and households experiencing homelessness in the City of Santa Clara and in the County of Santa Clara.
According to the Housing Inventory Count (HIC) for 2021, the City had a total capacity of 453 resources to support qualifying populations in the city—most of which were rapid rehousing (151 beds) or other permanent supportive housing (126 beds).
Although these resources are located within the city and are available to City residents, very little capacity is set-aside for residents or for those with a connection to the City of Santa Clara. Individuals within the city can access resources across the County of Santa Clara through the Here4You emergency shelter hotline and through the countywide Coordinated Entry System (CES).
In 2021, there were a total of 347 people with a connection to the City of Santa Clara in emergency shelters; 41 people in transitional housing; 230 people in rapid rehousing; 166 people in permanent supportive housing; and 206 people in homelessness prevention—regardless of the physical location of the program.
Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
Table 43 – Facilities & Housing Targeted to Homeless Households Data Source: List includes DV Shelters. Numbers are duplicate for Unaccompanied Youth and Unaccompanied Children.
Data includes entire continuum capacity and is aggregate for the County Emergency
Shelter Beds
Transitional
Housing Beds
Permanent Supportive
Housing Beds
Year-Round
Beds
(current & new)
Voucher/Seasonal/
Overflow
Beds
Current
and
New
Current
and
New
Under
Development
Households with
Adult(s) and Child(ren)
0 0 165 78 0
Households with
Only Adults
0 0 4 26 0
Chronically Homeless
Households
0 0 0 7 80
Veterans 0 0 0 0
Unaccompanied
Youth
0 4 20 28 0
Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons
The City of Santa Clara provides a range of mainstream services to support homeless persons (including those at risk of homelessness) and allocates funds for local non-profits and organizations to administer health, mental health, and employment services that complement the services targeted to homeless persons.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 90
The services available in Santa Clara City include but are not limited to:
Dignity on Wheels offers hot showers, free laundry facilities, and supportive services every Thursday on Bassett Street.
The City allocates HOME funds and contracts with Project Sentinel to provide fair housing services including tenant-based services; outreach activities to train housing providers and social service agencies; a Fair Housing Forum for elected and City officials; and for the creation of a multi-lingual guide on property management for landlords who may own only a few properties. The City also allocated CDBG funds to subsidize the rehabilitation of the Project Sentinel facility to provide proper service delivery and to expand the services offered by the organization. The Santa Clara Unified School District Adult Education Center helps students develop “Welfare to Work” plans and provides career advice, job placement assistance, resume development, and interview skills to students. Additionally, the Adult Education Center serves homeless persons by providing job training and housing opportunities.
The Behavioral Health Services Department (BHSD) offers mental health services and substance use treatment services for adults and older adults with substance use addictions and/or mental health needs. Services are available in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Vietnamese, and Tagalog and include:
Withdrawal management services (including residential detoxification); Residential treatment with individual, group, and family counseling; Recovery services including coaching, relapse prevention, and linkages to housing, transportation, job training, and education; and
Transitional housing for clients engaged in outpatient treatment that need a safe space or temporary housing.
HOPE Services provides services to people with developmental disabilities and with mental health needs. Services include day services, training and employment, mental health care, and community living services that support clients ability to live independently. The Santa Clara County Childcare Resource and Referral (R&R) Program offers information about available childcare options for families. The program also manages and provides access to the Santa Clara County Childcare Portal which is a database with over 2,000 childcare providers.
Additionally, City staff regularly coordinate with the Momentum Health Trusted Response Urgent Support Team (TRUST) program to help residents during urgent mental health or substance use situations. TRUST is a community-driven mobile mental health crisis response team composed of specially trained community residents including those who have first-hand experience with mental health challenges; crisis intervention specialists; and first aid provider/responders. TRUST teams are different from other County-supported mental health crisis response teams, as they respond without involving law enforcement. The TRUST team can be reached through the suicide crisis line at 9-8-8. The Santa Clara Police Department also coordinates closely with the Santa Clara County Psychiatric Emergency Response Team (PERT) which is a crisis 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 91
intervention model that pairs a licensed mental health clinician with a law enforcement officer to respond to calls in real time involving people in active, acute mental health crises.
Mainstream services that compliment services targeted to homeless persons include:
The Valley Homeless Healthcare Program (VHHP) is part of the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and provides medical services to homeless individuals, including primary care and urgent care. VHHP also manages a Medical Respite program for homeless individuals discharged from hospitals as well 21 as a Backpack Homeless Health Care Program for those in encampments. The County Social Services Agency has expedited the review process of homeless household CalFresh applications so that they may receive benefits within three days. The County Behavioral Health Services Department (BHS) has multiple programs to connect homeless individuals with housing or shelter assistance. BHS also treats those going through behavioral health crises.
The County Reentry Resource Center (RRC) provides services to those who have been previously incarcerated and to individuals who are homeless upon release. Services include referrals to drug treatment, housing assistance, food assistance, counseling, and other benefits. The County Office of Supportive Housing (OSH) mission is to increase the supply of housing and supportive housing that is affordable and available to extremely low income and /or special needs households. OSH supports the County mission of promoting a healthy, safe, and prosperous community by ending and preventing homelessness.
Other mainstream services include:
Non-Employment Income: Social Security, Social Security Disability, General Assistance, Cash Aid, CALWORKS, Veterans Benefits, Tribal TANF, and CAPI.
Food Related Assistance: CalFresh, SNAP, and WIC.
Legal Services: Bay Area Legal Aid and Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. Medical: Medicaid, Medicare, Covered California, and Valley Homeless Healthcare Program (VHHP).
Employment Training Opportunities: Living Wage Employment Initiative. The area Continuum of Care provides a Living Wage Employment Initiative, which is a program that engages previously homeless program participants in job training, holds jobs fairs, and connects them with living-wage 22 employment leading to careers in high growth industries. Transportation: CalWorks
Childcare: Early Childhood Providers and CalWorks
21 Valley Homeless Healthcare Program(VHHP).Santa Clara Valley Medical Center. https://www.scvmc.org/clinics- and- locations/Valley-Homeless-Health-Program/Pages/overview.aspx 22 FY2019 CoC Application
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 92
List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans a nd their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP -40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations.
23 In the City of Santa Clara, there are a total of 137 beds for households with children (HC); 11 beds for single males and females (SMF); 133 beds for single males and females and households with children (SMF+HC); and 4 beds for youth males and females (YMF). Table 3 below summarizes the organizations that offer facilities and beds to homeless persons and households with specific needs in Santa Clara City.
In addition to the beds and facilities shown below, the City of Santa Clara offers a variety of services that meet the needs of homeless persons including those with special housing and service needs. Services and facilities provided by or in Santa Clara City include but are not limited to:
The City works closely with Housing Trust Silicon Valley to provide security deposit and utility assistance to chronically homeless persons and to persons at-risk of becoming homeless. LifeMoves offers career skills development, resume workshops, and job search support for homeless individuals and families (including chronically homeless persons and families). The non-profit also offers education for children and childcare services within family shelters, health and wellness workshops, and financial literacy programs to clients. (LifeMoves’ program are provided in jurisdictions across Santa Clara County and San Mateo County.) The Health Trust delivers medically tailored meals (via Meals on Wheels) to persons with HIV/AIDS in Santa Clara City and has a chronic disease prevention and management services team that supports persons with HIV/AIDS by providing Ryan White case management, emergency transportation, financial assistance, and HOPWA or PSH subsidies. Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence provides a hotline, walk in crisis counseling, emergency shelter, a Housing First program to prevent immediate homelessness, and HomeSafe which provides long-term housing and support services. Next Door also offers employment services and support groups for LGBTQ+ persons, women, teens, and men.
Facilities to meet the needs of homeless persons and families in the City of Santa Clara are summarized in the table below including the target population.
Supplemental Figure 14. Homeless Beds
Data Source: City of Santa Clara
Organization Name Project Name Target
Population
Total
Beds
Abode Services City of Santa Clara TBRA SMF+HC 75
Abode Services Prop 36 RAP SMF 1
Bill Wilson Center Hathaway (formerly Lafayette Parenting) HC 10 Bill Wilson Center Jackson HC 13
Bill Wilson Center Peacock Commons HUD SMF+HC 16
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 93
Bill Wilson Center Peacock Commons LI SMF+HC 27
Bill Wilson Center Peacock Commons MHSA SMF+HC 11
Bill Wilson Center Youth Shelter North County YMF 4
County of Santa Clara Office of
Supportive Housing
[CCP Housing Maintenance]
MHSA Peacock SMF 7
County of Santa Clara Office of
Supportive Housing
SCC MHD – MHSA Belovida
Santa Clara SMF 3
HomeFirst
(formerly EHC LifeBuilders)
SFLC ? Veteran Rapid Rehousing Program
(VRRP) – OSH – SCC SMF+HC 4
HomeFirst
(formerly EHC LifeBuilders)
Sobrato Family Living Center
ELI (SFLC II) HC 74
HomeFirst
(formerly EHC LifeBuilders)
Sobrato Family Living Center
PSH (SFLC III) HC 40
Santa Clara City Council has recognized the need to develop a strategy to address increasing and chronic homelessness within the city. The Council has discussed the possibility of safe parking using the model that neighboring jurisdictions have adopted possibly as a pilot project but faces the barrier of identifying funding and land. Additional gaps related to homeless facilities that the city is in the process of addressing are the provision of inclement weather shelter for which the city has recently received funding from the state, and navigation of housing opportunities which is currently being handled by one staff person at a library which is insufficient to address the need which the city hopes to address with HOME funds. The city has identified a need for low barrier emergency shelter which currently does not sufficiently exist.
23 Valley Homeless Healthcare Program(VHHP).Santa Clara Valley Medical Center. https://www.scvmc.org/clinics- and- locations/Valley-Homeless-Health-Program/Pages/overview.aspx 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 94
MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210 (d) Introduction
This section describes the supportive housing needs of special needs populations in the City of Santa Clara including the special needs facilities and services available within City limits and regionally that service these populations. The populations considered in this section include: elderly and frail elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with addictions, public housing residents, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and survivors of domestic violence.
Elderly/senior households. To address the supportive housing needs of elderly persons and seniors living in Santa Clara City, Catholic Charities’ Ombudsman Program assists low income seniors in long- term care facilities by working to resolve client problems and cases and by improving the quality of their care. Additionally, seniors in Santa Clara City are served by the Silicon Valley Independent Living Center (SVILC) which provides information on and referrals to independent living facilities, independent living skills trainings, self-advocacy training, and referrals to housing. The center also provides home modification assistance, emergency financial assistance, assistive technology, benefits counseling, access to an accessible computer lab, and transition assistance to support seniors and elderly persons moving from nursing homes or institutions into integrated community-based living.
Seniors are also served by Live Oak Adult Day Services which offers a structured day program for seniors and is designed to help caregivers go to work and finish errands while providing support to seniors with cognitive or physical impairments. Additionally, the City provides access to Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) which are non-medical facilities that provide care and assistance with daily living activities (bathing, grooming, etc.) to persons 60 years and over and to persons under 60 years with certain circumstances. The City currently has 80 RCFE beds available for elderly persons.
Persons with disabilities. Residents with disabilities in the City of Santa Clara have unique supportive housing and service needs and face additional housing barriers as many of these households have lower incomes, higher poverty rates, lack access to affordable and accessible housing, and a limited availability of affordable in-home care (including in-home caregivers). Persons with developmental disabilities in the City of Santa Clara also have unique supportive housing and service needs. Housing Choices (a non-profit that services persons with developmental disabilities), provided the following comments on the needs of residents with developmental disabilities in Santa Clara County. These comments were received as part of the City’s Housing Element update.
Between September 2015 and June 2021, the Department of Developmental Services reported that Santa Clara County residents with developmental disabilities age 62 and older grew by 35%.
This likely means that more adults with developmental disabilities will outlive their parents and family members who are the largest source of housing for people with developmental disabilities in the City of Santa Clara.
The reduced rate of occupant turnover, coupled with closing facilities, will make it more difficult for middle-aged and senior adults who have been living with aging parents in the City of Santa Clara to transition to licensed care when their parents pass away. Notwithstanding 20% growth in Santa Clara County’s total population of adults with developmental disabilities, the 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 95
Department of Developmental Services has documented a 15% decline in the age group 42 to 51 in the county between September 2015 and June 2021.
Displacement takes a toll on adults with developmental disabilities who depend on familiarity with transit routes and shopping and services, as well as support from community-based services and informal networks built up over years of living in Santa Clara.
There are several group homes and independent living options for residents with disabilities in the City of Santa Clara (Figure 7)—however only 56 income-restricted units are set-aside for residents with developmental disabilities. To meet demand, the City’s Housing Element estimates that a 35% increase would require the construction of 76 new housing units for this special needs group. Additionally, in the City of Santa Clara, HOPE Services supports persons with developmental disabilities and persons with mental health needs by providing support services including day services, training and employment, mental health services, and community living services that support clients’ ability to live independently.
Supplemental Figure 15. Group Homes and Independent Living for Persons with Disabilities in the City of Santa Clara and Surrounding Communities
Note: Monroe Commons is currently under construction in which 10 of the 40 apartment units will be set -aside for persons with developmental disabilities.
Source: City of Santa Clara Housing Element.
Persons with addictions and/or mental illness. In the City of Santa Clara, persons with addictions and persons with a mental illness are at an increased risk of homelessness and housing instability as many individuals lack access to the supportive housing and services they need to remain stably housed. Residents with addictions and/or a mental illness in Santa Clara City are served by Abode Services’ five-member outreach team which targets high need individuals with mental health challenges to add them to the County’s housing queue and to connect them to community services and resources while they wait for housing. The City also provides CDBG funds to the Bill Wilson Center (which serves homeless youth, Property Name
City of Santa Clara
Briarwood Cooperative Shared SF home with 4 private bedrooms for individuals with developmental disabilities
2113 Briarwood Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95051
De La Cruz Cooperative Shared SF home with 4 private bedrooms for individuals with developmental disabilities
3779 De La Cruz Blvd.
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Monroe Commons 10 apartments set-aside for persons with developmental disabilities
2330 Monroe Street
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Surrounding Communities
Life Services Alternative 3 five-person group homes for persons with physical or developmental disabilities
260 W. Hamilton Ave
Campbell, CA 95008
Stoney Pine Villa 12 one-bedroom units, 8 two-bedroom units, 3 three-bedroom units
267 W. California Street
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Capacity Location
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 96
unaccompanied youth, and young adults) to provide case management services to transitional age youth including those exiting the foster care system and victims of human trafficking.
Residents with addictions and/or a mental illness in Santa Clara City also have access to Behavioral Health Services in Santa Clara County which provides mental health services and substance use treatment services for adults and older adults with substance use and mental health needs (including persons experiencing homelessness). Services are available in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Vietnamese, and Tagalog and include: withdrawal management services (including residential detoxification), residential treatment services that includes group, individual, and family counseling; recovery services such as coaching, relapse prevention, and referrals to housing, transportation, job training, and education; and transitional housing for clients engaged in outpatient treatment and need a safe space to stay/temporary housing.
Public housing residents. Public housing residents have complex supportive housing and service needs as many households have very low to low incomes and are at an increased risk of housing instability if they were to lose their housing assistance. The Santa Clara County Housing Authority currently holds more than 17,000 Housing Choice Vouchers but there are roughly 42,000 people currently on the interest list, indicating a widespread need for rental assistance. New voucher resources were obtained this year, such as HUD-VASH vouchers and vouchers for homeless persons and families with disabilities. The primary obstacle for putting vouchers to use is a lack of units and landlord resistance to taking vouchers.
The Housing Authority currently contracts with Abode Services, a local nonprofit service provider, to assist people obtaining vouchers in their housing search.
Additionally, the City identifies voucher holders as living in areas of the city where households experience higher rates of overcrowding. According to the City’s Housing Element, census tracts in the northern parts of the City of Santa Clara that have higher voucher utilization rates (5% to 15%) also have higher rates of overcrowding (12% to 15%) than the City overall.
Persons living with HIV/AIDS. Persons living with HIV/AIDS have a need for consistent access to medical care and supportive services which requires that households have access to stable and affordable housing, preferably within proximity to public transit and/or proximity to supportive services or medical facilities. Due to the high cost of specialized care and reduced incomes (individuals are often unable to work while ill), persons with HIV/AIDS and their families need greater access to housing assistance such as short-term rental or mortgage payment assistance and/or utilities assistance to help prevent long- term instability or homelessness.
Residents with HIV/AIDS living in the City of Santa Clara are served by The Health Trust which delivers medically tailored meals (via Meals on Wheels) to persons with HIV/AIDS in Santa Clara and has a chronic disease prevention and management services team that supports residents by providing Ryan White case management services, emergency transportation, financial assistance, and HOPWA and PSH subsidies. Residents are also served by The Health Trust which delivers medically tailored meals (via Meals on Wheels) to persons with HIV/AIDS in Santa Clara City. The organization also has a chronic disease prevention and management services team that supports persons with HIV/AIDS by providing Ryan White case management, emergency transportation, financial assistance, and HOPWA or PSH subsidies.
Survivors of domestic violence. Survivors of domestic violence need financial assistance and other economic development programs to address the impacts of financial abuse (which often leads to poor 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 97
credit, low or no income, and lack of employment history). Providers serving survivors of domestic violence in the City of Santa Clara also identify a need for eviction prevention services, competent and compassionate behavioral health care, legal protective orders, help obtaining or keeping custody of children, and immigration or asylums support (especially for those fleeing trafficking). While there is a documented need to provide these services (and housing) to people fleeing violence or exploitation, the volume of the resources available in the City does not meet the need. As noted in the City’s 2021 HOME- ARP Plan, people fleeing violence and exploitation face additional challenges in finding housing and need specialized supportive services to ensure their safety and to overcome housing barriers. These specialized services must include risk assessment, safety planning, and protection of personal information by providers who understand the unique needs of survivors.
Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing
Santa Clara City residents have access to the following programs that provide assistance in identifying housing opportunities upon release from institutional care:
Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) are non-medical facilities that provide a level of care that includes assistance with activities of daily living, such as bathing and grooming. These facilities serve persons 60 years and older and persons under 60 years with certain circumstances. The City has 208 RCFE beds available for elderly persons (Facility Search Welcome) The Valley Homeless Healthcare Program (VHHP) is part of the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and provides medical services to homeless individuals, including primary care and urgent care. VHHP also manages a Medical Respite program for homeless individuals discharged from hospitals The County Social Services Agency has expedited the review process of homeless household CalFresh applications so that they may receive benefits within three days.
The County Behavioral Health Services Department (BHS) has multiple programs to connect homeless individuals with housing or shelter assistance. BHS also treats those going through behavioral health crises.
The County Reentry Resource Center (RRC) provides services to those who have been previously incarcerated and to individuals who are homeless upon release. Services include referrals to drug treatment, housing assistance, food assistance, counseling, and other benefits.
Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one -year goals. 91.315(e)
*Section update in progress
Community engagement identified a significant need for supportive services for people with disabilities, seniors, victims of domestic violence, and low-income households. In FY 2020-2021, the City will allocate funding towards housing and supportive services identified for non-homeless persons with special needs, 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 98
including services for domestic violence survivors, youth and family therapy and grief counselling, long-term care ombudsdman services, senior nutrition, senior transportation, senior legal services, senior adult day care, and homeless prevention through our Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program.
The Homeless Point-in-Time count has shown that homeless families are on the rise; thus, the City TBRA program is focused on assisting homeless families with children and households fleeing domestic violence.
Further, if there are families that are on the verge of homelessness (e.g., under a 30-day notice to vacate), those can also be assisted through the TBRA program.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 99
MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210 (e)
Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment
The City has identified multiple constraints or barriers to the affordable housing and residential investment in its 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, including:
Governmental constraints
Land use controls and development standards. While land use controls help to maintain the quality of the city’s residential neighborhoods, they can be viewed as constraints in that they determine the amount of land to be developed for housing and establish a limit on the number of units that can be built on a site. The City’s standards have not been changed substantially since 1969;
Residential development standards. The City’s Zoning Ordinance contains development standards for each zoning district, including minimum lot sizes, setbacks, widths, densities, and restrictions on building and landscape coverage.
Parking standards. Parking can substantially add to the cost of housing. The City’s Zoning Ordinance currently requires two spaces per unit in both single-family and multi-family districts.
Planning and development fees. The City and other agencies assess a number of fees that affect the development of and cost of housing. Compared to other county jurisdictions, the City’s fees for residential projects are considered moderate.
On- and off-site improvement requirements. On- and off-site improvements, including public streets, curbing, sidewalks, streetlights, water, sewer, and drainage requirements, have an impact on the cost of residential development. Improvement requirements for new developments are regulated under the Subdivision Ordinance. Off-site improvement requirements are less costly in a fully developed community since infrastructure needed to serve infill development is already in place. However, the financial burden of improvements as the City’s infrastructure ages is a concern.
Non-governmental constraints
Locally and regionally, there are several constraints that hinder the City’s ability to accommodate the community’s housing needs. The high cost of land, rising development costs, and neighborhood opposition make it expensive for developers to build affordable housing. These constraints may result in housing that is not affordable to low- and moderate-income households or may render residential construction economically infeasible for developers. While local government has little influence on larger market factors such as interest rates, its policies and regulations can act as constraints that affect both the amount of residential development that takes place and the affordability of housing. Specific 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 100
constraints include:
Land Availability. In 2022, fewer than five acres of vacant parcels (including right-of-way properties) are zoned for residential or mixed use development throughout the city, including in the three focus areas for future development (El Camino Real, Lawrence Station, and Tasman East).
Community Resistance. Historically, there has been community opposition to higher density residential infill development proposed along major transportation corridors, particularly when that development is located directly adjacent to long-established single-family neighborhoods.
Construction Costs. Market constraints substantially influence the cost of housing and pose a challenge to providing housing affordable for all income levels. Land prices are typically the most significant component of the cost. The cost of land has increased rapidly over the past decade.
Construction costs and fluctuating interest rates are also major contributors to in the increasing cost of housing in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Availability of financing. The availability of financing affects a person’s ability to purchase or improve a home. The primary concern in a review of lending activity is to see whether home financing is generally available in the community. Developers of affordable housing face significant challenges in securing financing. Due to the limited possible return from rents or sales prices of affordable units, many private lenders are unable to finance affordable projects due to the rate of return. Thus, affordable developers must rely on community lending divisions, nonprofit institutions, grants and special loans, and local assistance.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 101
MA-45 Non- Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) Introduction
Santa Clara City’s largest employment sectors are Professional, Scientific, and Management Services and Manufacturing, comprising just over half of all jobs in the City. The next largest employment industry is Education and Health Care. Santa Clara’s employment landscape mirrors that of the county overall in its with a large share of jobs in Manufacturing, which is the largest single employment industry countywide.
Information and Professional, Scientific, and Management Services are ver y high paying industries, with annual average wages ranging from $250,000 to $400,000.
Education and health care workers are paid much less, averaging between $85,000 and $95,000 in annual salaries. These workers are an integral part of the City’s econom y and, unless they are living in multiple worker households, struggle to find affordable rentals and cannot afford to become homeowners in the City. As shown below, Santa Clara City has the second highest share of single worker households in the County, with 43% of workers in one -worker households. This reflects the high wages paid in the tech - dominant industries, which enable workers to live alone and afford rent. Lower wage workers in other industries, however, will need to live in multiple -worker househo lds, which the rental stock may not deliver.
Supplemental Figure 16. Workers per Household, Participating Jurisdictions, 2022/23 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 102
Source: 2022 and 2023 ACS and Root Policy Research.
Economic Development Market Analysis
Business Activity
Table 45 – Business Activity
Data Source: 2022 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics
Business by Sector
Number
of
Workers
Number
of
Jobs
Share of
Workers
%
Share of
Jobs
%
Jobs less
workers
%
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 204 36 0.3% 0.0% -0.3% Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 3,878 7,223 6.4% 6.5% 0.2% Construction 2,195 6,972 3.6% 6.3% 2.7%
Education and Health Care Services 9,911 13,484 16.2% 12.1% -4.1% Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 2,604 2,756 4.3% 2.5% -1.8% ■ o/o of HH with no workers ■ o/o of HH with 1 workers
■ o/o of HH with 2 workers ■ o/o of HH with 3+ workers
United States
California
Santa Clara County
San Jose
Participating Cities
Cupertino
Gilroy
Milpitas
Mountain View
Palo Alto
Santa Clara (city)
Sunnyvale
Urban County
Campbell
Los Altos
Los Altos Hills
Los Gatos
Monte Sereno
Morgan Hill
Saratoga
26% 37%
23% 36% 30% 11 %
18% 37% 34% 11 %
18% 36% 33% 13%
20% 39% 34% 7%
18% 36% ~
11% 47% 36% 6
29% 41% 26% 5
14% 43% ~
26% 34% ~
31% 30% 34% 5
25% 40% 31% 4
33% 35% ~
28% 31%
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 103
Information 7,894 7,600 12.9% 6.8% -6.1%
Manufacturing 10,288 30,907 16.8% 27.8% 11.0%
Other Services 1,166 1,471 1.9% 1.3% -0.6%
Professional, Scientific, Management Services 11,456 25,074 18.8% 22.6% 3.8% Administration and Support, Waste
Management 3,270 6,527 5.4% 5.9% 0.5%
Public Administration 1,197 754 2.0% 0.7% -1.3%
Retail Trade 3,458 3,262 5.7% 2.9% -2.7%
Transportation & Warehousing 1,828 1,322 3.0% 1.2% -1.8% Wholesale Trade 1,718 3,667 2.8% 3.3% 0.5%
Grand Total 61,067 111,055 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Supplemental Figure 17. Employment and Wages, Santa Clara County, 2023
Source: BLS QCEW and Root Policy Research.
Labor Force
Total Employment
Manufacturing
Professional, scienti fic, techn ical svcs
Health care and social assistance
Information 94,924
Accommodation and food services :,J..ijj
Educational Services :ji:§ij■
Retail trade fif:~j
Adm in and waste mgmt/remediation §•H:i~j
Public adm inistration Mfi§•II
Construction 41@¥).j
Who lesale trade - 28,097
other services - 25,078
Finance and insurance • 21 ,025
Arts, entertainment , and recreation ■ 17,739
Transportation and warehousing ■ 15,873
Real estate and renta l and leasing ■ 15,620
Management of companies ■ 14,474
Ag, forestry , fishing and hunting 12,915
Utilities I 1,702
Unclassified 165
Mining and oil and gas extraction 146
176,495
160,970
141,635
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000
Average Annual Wage
$302,214
$243,373
- $85,372
■ $37,818
- $97,295
• $58,904
- $76,908
- $117,783
- $113,021
$170,006
■ $56,804
$398,210
$215,318
• $63,302
$153,571
- $112,017
■ $56,284
$178,101
- $95,453
- $113,061
$0 $200,000
$308,266
$400,000 $600,000
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 104
Table 46 – Labor Force
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
Labor Force Population Total
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 77,717
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 74,313
Unemployment Rate 4.38%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 0.07%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 0.04%
Table 47– Occupations by Sector
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business and financial 15,123
Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 165
Service 6,799
Sales and office 9,821
Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 2,450
Production, transportation and material moving 4,178
Travel Time
Table 48 – Travel Time
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
Travel Time Number Percentage
< 30 Minutes 44,288 69%
30-59 Minutes 16,141 25%
60 or More Minutes 3,448 5%
Total 63,877 100%
Education:
Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older)
Table 49 – Educational Attainment by Employment Status
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
Educational Attainment In Labor Force Not in Labor
Force Civilian Employed Unemployed
Less than high school graduate 1,604 0 1,225
High school graduate (includes equivalency) 4,714 273 1,827 Some college or Associate degree 9,744 727 1,809
Bachelor degree or higher 49,140 1,434 6,764
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 105
Educational Attainment by Age
Table 50 – Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
18–24 25–34 35–44 45–65 65+
Less than 9th grade 0 924 362 678 671
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 577 50 0 815 1,225
High school graduate, GED, or alternative 2,330 1,306 1,557 3,951 2,605 Some college, no degree 5,127 2,354 2,376 4,837 3,060
Associate’s degree 1,218 702 773 1,238 1,743
Bachelor’s degree 4,249 13,656 7,513 7,584 3,606
Graduate or professional degree 1,203 12,165 8,611 7,899 2,908 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 106
Educational Attainment – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Table 51 – Education Attainment and Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Data Source: ACS 2023 5 year estimates
Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate $33,097
High school graduate (includes equivalency) $52,243
Some college or Associate’s degree $59,186
Bachelor’s degree $120,714
Graduate or professional degree $165,852
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
Although most Santa Clara City residents have college degrees and higher, a sizeable number of individuals have not obtained a college degree and are likely supporting high -paying jobs through employment in retail and services; their jobs may also be more susceptible to economic downturns. Affordable housing and housing stability programs should be targeted to these workers, in addition to persons e xperiencing homelessness. Employers should be motivated to help support workers in these industries as well; even if they are not direct employees, success of their industries depends on their service.
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
Santa Clara City enjoys a strong and diversified local, and globally connected economy. Local business success stories are not limited to the technology industry alone. *Section update in progress
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community. Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period.
*Section update in progress
CityPlace Santa Clara (aka, Related Santa Clara) is a proposed phased development of approximately 240 acres of City-owned land that includes a new urban center with a retail and entertainment district, office development, and residential uses, as well as outdoor amenities, infrastructure, parkland, and open space.
The core retail and entertainment district with some office and residential uses is identified as City Center, located in close proximity to Levi Stadium and the City Convention Center. The overall project includes the construction of medium and high-rise buildings up to 17 stories in height and a maximum of
9.16 million gross square feet of overall floor area for all uses, excluding the floor area of associated parking structures. A minimum of 200 residential units and a maximum of 1 ,680 residential units are 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 107
contemplated within the City Center portion of the project.
The decision to offer development of the project site is based upon the social and economic benefits that will accrue to the City and region in terms of new retail and entertainment opportunities not readily found in the south bay area, as well as creation of jobs, property tax and sales tax revenues, and land lease revenues. In addition, the City Center uses and activities will provide support for nearby employment and residential sites, the Convention Center, Levi Stadium, Great America Theme Park, and for a variety of visitors from near and far.
The economic analysis provided by the economic consultant (which was peer reviewed by the City economic consultant, Keyser Marston) projected as follows:
• The fiscal surplus from the project (General Fund tax revenues minus expenditures) is estimated at $13.1 million annually after completion of the first three phases and at $16.9 million annually at buildout. The net additional funds will be available to support other City services.
• Sales tax and transient occupancy tax, which will comprise the largest revenues from the project to the City General Fund, largely will be driven by new retail and food and beverage sales that will substantially increase the City sales and draw visitors/tourists to the area.
• The project will generate substantial special tax revenue towards the Communities Facilities District (CFD) which was formed as part of the Levi Stadium project. While the CFD revenue does not contribute directly to the General Fund, it is estimated to generate a total of $1.2 million to annually finance portions of the publicly-owned infrastructure for the Levi Stadium.
• In addition to the ongoing revenues, one-time sales tax revenues will be generated for the City from construction purchases. Through the purchase of building materials within the City, total buildout construction is expected to generate approximately $1.7 million in onetime sales tax revenues to the General Fund.
The project will also enhance the gas recovery system currently operating on the closed landfill. The project also will create a substantial number and variety of jobs for residents in the City and region and provide new retail and business services to residents in the area. Finally, the public benefits of the project include a new fire station, a commitment that at least 10% of all residential units on the site will be affordable to at least a moderate income level, and the set aside of open space, associated improvements and funds to enable the development of that open space.
Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.
Infrastructure changes that may support this development have already been incorporated into the plan.
Much of the workforce and business that will support this development are already present.
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
The residents of Santa Clara City are highly educated, with 33% of the labor force having a bachelor’s 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 108
degree and an additional 33% having a graduate degree. A majority of jobs within the City are professional, scientific, and management services; education, manufacturing, and health care services. Overall, the workforce is able to adequately fill these positions. Regional economic development stakeholders interviewed for this Consolidated Plan, however, indicated a mismatch across the Santa Clara County region following the substantial tech industry layoffs a few years ago. There is an abundance of highly skilled, high paying jobs (versus entry level tech jobs) and very low skilled, low paying jobs that households cannot live on and many people who are in the middle and are not able to find jobs. The proliferation of AI is also likely to change the employability of people who are reluctant to learn and use these tools which could dramatically impact workers in this region. Stakeholders are seeing a percentage of layoff notices in the county that are 2 to 3 times the norm; roughly 12,000 people over the past few years. Many workers are in need of upskilling and programs are in place in partnership with community colleges to reach this population described in more detail below. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 109
Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.
The City partners with NOVA --a local nonprofit agency, federally funded, that provides job seekers with resume and job search assistance, assessment, and referrals to specialized training and educational programs. The City’s new Economic Vitality Strategy calls for continued partnership with NOVA to develop training programs that target underserved groups.
NOVA is directed by the NOVA Workforce Board which works on behalf of Cupertino, Los Altos, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Santa Clara, and Sunnyvale. To support workforce mobility, NOVA provides:
Real-time labor market information about in-demand skills Skill-building and enhancements to match market demand Navigation tools for the ever-changing and entrepreneurial new labor market Advocacy for necessary infrastructure to support workers between opportunities, such as unemployment insurance for all and portable benefits
Interconnected support system for multiple career pathways for youth
To prepare potential employees for the technology driven industries in the Silicon Valley, NOVA provides necessary digital literacy training along with other services.
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? No.
If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.
*Section update in progress
Every two years, the Santa Clara City Council adopts a strategic plan in order to properly align budget decisions and City resources. The strategic plan of the City Council includes: promote and enhance 26 economic and housing development.”
Discussion
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 110
MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion – 91.215 (f) Introduction
Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration")
As discussed in the NA section, households with disproportionately high rates of multiple housing problems include:
For 0-30% AMI households, needs are significant across race / ethnicity For 31-50% AMI households, Black, and Hispanic households have disproportionately higher rates of housing problems.
For 51 -80% AMI and 81 -100% AMI households, Black and Asian households have disproportionately high rates of housing problems.
Santa Clara City’s Housing Element uses Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) to identify concentrated need. There are no R/ECAPs in Santa Clara City . There are, however, small concentrated areas of lower income residents in the central area of the City.
What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods?
The Housing Element indicates that a relative concentration by race/ethnicity and lower income households in small pockets in central Santa Clara City suggest a need for “proactive outreach to connect residents with new affordable housing opportunities as well as education about City services such as landlord tenant rights according to state laws as well as mediation services, home repair, and proactive code enforcement. Such outreach, education, and services could help increase mobility and improve living conditions in these areas.” The Housing Element also identified these particular areas as having higher concentrations of Hispanic and Asian households indicating a need to conduct outreach to these communities and city services that are accessible in the relevant languages.
Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods?
*Section update in progress
The racial and ethnic minority and LMI concentrations identified above contain tourist related establishments, such as Levi Stadium and Great America as well as many commercial and industrial buildings. This area is also home to Mission College, Oracle Headquarters, and the County Fair. Specifically, the LMI concentrations identified above contain commercial buildings as well as older and smaller single- family homes in downtown Santa Clara. They also likely contain some of the student population of Santa Clara University, which is located in the census tract to the east. Downtown Santa Clara also contains the Santa Clara Courthouse, California College of Communications, and Santa Clara Senior Center.
Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas?
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 111
MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households -
91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2)
Per HUD guidance, all Consolidated Plans submitted after January 1, 2018, must address broadband needs within the jurisdiction. Below is a map outlining mobile and the region’s access to providers offering broadband services. According to the Federal Communications Commission Fixed Broadband Deployment website accessed in 2025 and based on data from 2021, 100% of the City of Santa Clara residents have access to broadband. The speeds identified are 25Mbps download and 3Mbps upload – the minimum speeds to be considered broadband.
The majority of the City of Santa Clara has access to 3-5 internet service providers. The City of Santa Clara is far above the national average and performs similarly to other cities throughout the Bay Area region.
Many of the internet providers have special plans for low -income households. Data was obtained from the Federal Communications Commission’s Fixed Broadband Deployment website.
Although broadband accessibility is ubiquitous in the region, digital literacy and access to devices is a barrier for lower income residents in accessing services (particularly elderly residents), navigating city and county systems and searching for job and/or workforce development opportunities. Digital literacy coaching and classes are provided as a supportive service in some affordable housing communities, however, the frequency of these classes is limited due to the staffing constraints and cost.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 112
MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3)
Per HUD guidance, all Consolidated Plan submitted after January 1, 2018, must assess risks of natural hazard associated with climate change to low-and moderate-income residents. As part of the 2023 County of Santa Clara’s Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – a county wide plan that identifies risks from natural and manmade disasters and how to minimize damage – the City of Santa Clara developed an city specific annex to this plan through which it has reviewed and evaluated a set of potential natural hazards to help identify the top hazards threatening the area and . The table below summarizes the analysis.
Supplemental Figure 18. Hazard Types
Hazard Type
(in order of risk)
Exposed
Population
# of buildings
exposed
Total Value
Exposed
Earthquake All 28,809 $43,398,577,930
Flood (1% Annual Chance area) 6,897 1,652 $2,426,583,504 Flood (.2% Annual Chance area) 100,893 23,003 $26,864,946,619 Severe weather $43,398,577,930
Dam Fail (Anderson) 21,109 5,227 $12,755,392,232
Dam Fail (Lexington) 71,413 17,085 $31,901,472,575
High Risk Landslide Areas N/A N/A $95,895,321
Estimated Population Residing in Sea Level Rise
Inundation Areas
1,791 450 $2,501,802,492
The City of Santa Clara has the following critical facilities and infrastructures to respond to a disaster:
- 19 Emergency Response/Public Health & Safety
- 79 Infrastructure Lifelines
- 103 Socioeconomic facilities
- 94 Hazardous Materials
The Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST) in the figure below identifies census tracts that are overburdened and underserved. One tract in Santa Clara meets the thresholds for disadvantaged communities. Linguistic isolation, percentage of individuals with less than a high school diploma, high flood risk, exposure to air pollutants, and proximity to superfund and hazardous waste sites are among the factors contributing to Santa Clara’s disadvantaged status.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 113
Supplemental Figure 19. Santa Clara City High Vulnerability Census Tracts.
Regional Hazard Mitigation Planning. Santa Clara County faces growing risks from natural hazards as a direct result of climate change. The Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) identifies climate change as a key factor contributing to worsening year-round wildfire seasons, rising temperatures, and shifting precipitation patterns, all of which heighten the risks of drought, flash flooding, and infrastructure failure.1 As climate-driven hazards intensify, they require a coordinated response to mitigate their long-term impacts on communities across the county. These hazards, including wildfires, deteriorating air quality, extreme heat, drought, and flooding, are increasing in frequency and severity, threatening public safety, infrastructure, and economic stability.
Wildfires pose an escalating threat, particularly in areas where dense vegetation meets urban development. Rising temperatures, prolonged dry conditions, and increased fuel loads are intensifying wildfire frequency, spread, and destructiveness. Without proactive mitigation efforts, these conditions can continue to drive more frequent and severe wildfires.2 While not all residents may be directly exposed to wildfire, secondary impacts, such as smoke and deteriorating air quality, will affect a much larger portion of the population. Vulnerable groups—including older adults, low-income residents, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions—are at the highest risk of experiencing respiratory
0. Sift
Figure 5: CEJST Disadvantaged Communltios in Santa Clara City 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 114
complications and other long-term public health effects. As wildfire events become more frequent and severe, these secondary impacts will become an increasing concern for the county’s public health and emergency response efforts.
Extreme heat events affect public health, infrastructure, and energy demand. In high-density urban areas, particularly those with limited green space and inadequate cooling infrastructure, the urban heat island effect exacerbates already high temperatures, placing vulnerable populations at increased risk.
Without proper mitigation, heat waves can lead to heat-related illnesses, increased strain on healthcare systems, and disruptions to energy infrastructure.³
Flooding remains a persistent concern, particularly in low-lying areas and neighborhoods near major waterways. Climate change is increasing the frequency and intensity of extreme storm events.⁴ Recognizing the growing impact of climate change on natural hazards, Santa Clara County incorporates climate adaptation into its emergency planning efforts. By aligning infrastructure investments, emergency preparedness programs, and land-use policies with climate change projections and community vulnerability assessments, the county is proactively enhancing resilience and protecting communities from future disasters.
Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods.
A truly resilient community is one where all residents have the opportunity to thrive, maintain their well-being, and enjoy a high quality of life. However, systemic barriers—including limited access to healthcare, housing insecurity, and financial instability—disproportionately affect low- and moderate- income households, leaving them more vulnerable to climate-related hazards. The escalating impacts of climate change, such as extreme heat, wildfires, flooding, and shifting weather patterns, can deepen these inequities. Those most at risk include older adults, individuals with disabilities, outdoor workers, linguistically isolated households, and those lacking adequate healthcare or financial resources, all of whom face heightened challenges in adapting to climate-driven hazards.
For many low- and moderate-income residents, housing conditions significantly influence their exposure to climate risks. A large portion of this population lives in older or substandard housing, which often lacks modern structural protections against extreme weather events. These deficiencies leave residents more vulnerable to displacement, property damage, and long-term housing instability. Wildfire exposure is a particular concern in high-risk zones often adequate defensible space is difficult to achieve.
The financial burden of retrofitting these homes or establishing evacuation plans is often prohibitive for low-income households, leaving them at greater risk during wildfire events.⁵
Extreme heat disproportionately impacts renters with limited financial resources, especially those living in older buildings with poor insulation and inadequate ventilation. High energy costs make it difficult for many households to maintain safe indoor temperatures, increasing the risk of heat-related illnesses and other health complications. To address these challenges, the Sustainability Master Plan (SMP) emphasizes the need for community cooling programs, urban tree-planting initiatives, and housing retrofits to create safer and more resilient living conditions.⁶
Flooding hazards can disproportionately affect lower-income households living in flood-prone areas.
Without flood insurance or financial savings, disaster recovery is far more difficult. The MJHMP stresses the need for expanded stormwater management and flood mitigation programs to reduce these risks.4 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 115
Recognizing these increasing hazards, Santa Clara County is actively integrating climate resilience into its hazard mitigation planning. Climate change projections and community vulnerability assessments are shaping investments in infrastructure, emergency preparedness programs, and land-use policies to ensure long-term resilience and adaptability.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 116
Strategic Plan
SP-05 Overview
Strategic Plan Overview
The Strategic Plan identifies the five-year goals that the City of Santa Clara expects to achieve during the 2025–2029 ConPlan Cycle. These goals are aligned with HUD objectives and outcomes and are achieved through the Annual Action Plan, which divides up the five -year goals into annual targets. The City has identified five high-need categories through the Needs Analysis, Market Analysis, and Community Outreach portions of the ConPlan. The Strategic Plan then identifies goals that are aligned to address most of those needs. Not every need identified in the plan can be met and sufficiently addressed in the next five years.
Some of the needs are not feasible, some require much more funding than the City currently receives, and some are simply too large to be addressed in just five years. Priority needs identified in this Consolidated Plan include:
1. Housing: Increasing the supply of affordable housing.
2. Homelessness: Stabilizing persons at-risk of and experiencing homelessness through housing, and supportive services by facilitating access to mental health and addiction recovery services.
3. Community development: Improve neighborhood safety through neighborhood cleanups, street lighting and park improvements, bolster/create public space for senior activities, and food pantries.
4. Economic Development: Provide more opportunities for resident workforce development and/or build outreach campai gn for existing programs, create community partnerships to address childcare access as a component of workforce participation.
5. Fair Housing: Improve navigation and case management services for residents needing housing, legal services (related to housing) and basic services including documentation assistance.
To address these needs during the 5 -year planning period, the City will implement the following goals.
These goals will guide allocation of CDBG and HOME:
1. Increase the supply of affordable rental housing for households with incomes ranging from 0-80% AMI.
2. Respond to homelessness and risk of homelessness through housing stabilization, supportive services including mental health services, and economic resiliency programs.
3. Invest in infrastructure and public facility improvements that prioritize safety , accessibility, and community building.
4. Invest in projects that increase opportunities for workforce development.
5. Address and promote fair housing choice through bolstering case management and navigation of regional services including legal assistance.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 117
SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1)
Geographic Area
The City does not have any geographic areas. Funds will be spent citywide to assist low-income residents.
Table 52 – Geographic Priority Areas
Area Name: N/A
Other Target Area Description:
HUD Approval Data:
% of Low/Mod:
Revital Type:
Other Revital Type:
Identify the neighborhood
boundaries for this target
area.
Include specific housing and
commercial characteristics of
this target area.
How did your consultation
and citizen participation
process help you to identify
this neighborhood as a
target area?
Identify the needs in this
target area.
What are the opportunities for
improvement in this target
area?
Are there barriers to
improvement in this target
area?
General Allocation Priorities
Investments will be made City-wide.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 118
SP-25 Priority Needs – 91.215 (a)(2)
Priority Needs
Table 53 –Priority Needs Summary
1 Priority Need Name Affordable Housing
Priority Level High
Population
Extremely-low and low-income households, Large Families with children, Elderly and Frail Elderly, Persons with Mental Disabilities, Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities, Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions, Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families, Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic Areas Affected Citywide
Associated Goals Affordable Housing
Description
Assist in the creation and preservation of affordable housing for low income and special needs households through continuation of the Neighborhood Conservation and Improvement Program, rental rehabilitation of units occupied by low income tenants, TBRA rental subsidies, and new construction.
Basis for
Relative Priority
As discussed in the Needs Assessment, there is a 5,229-unit gap of affordable housing units for households earning between 0%-30% AMI.
2 Priority Need Name Homelessness
Priority Level High
Population
Chronic Homelessness Individuals, Families with Children, Mentally Ill, Chronic Substance Abuse, Veterans, Persons with HIV/AIDS, Victims of Domestic Violence, Unaccompanied Youth
Geographic Areas Affected Citywide
Associated Goals Homelessness
Description
Support activities, consistent with Continuum of Care strategies, to prevent and end homelessness. This includes building affordable housing for people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness as well as the provision of support services.
Basis for Relative Priority 461 persons are experiencing homelessness in the City of Santa Clara and 9,903 persons are countywide (see Needs Assessment).
3 Priority Need Name Public Services
Priority Level High
Population
Extremely-low and low-income households, Large Families with children, Elderly and Frail Elderly, Unaccompanied Youth, Persons with Mental Disabilities, Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities, Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions, Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families, Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic Areas Affected Citywide
Associated Goals Public Services
Description
Support activities that provide basic needs to lower income households and special needs populations. Services would be provided to low-income households, elderly individuals, homeless persons, people with disabilities, and victims of domestic violence.
Basis for Relative Priority As identified during community engagement efforts, LMI households are in needs of supportive services.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 119
4 Priority Need Name Fair Housing
Priority Level High
Population Large Families, Families with Children, Elderly, Persons with Mental Disabilities, Persons with Physical Disabilities, Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Geographic Areas Affected Citywide
Associated Goals Fair Housing
Description Promote fair housing choice, through the following activities: fair housing education, fair housing testing, housing assistance hotline, and landlord - tenant mediation.
Basis for Relative Priority Housing discrimination continues to occur within the City as identified by Project Sentinel.
5 Priority Need Name Public Facilities
Priority Level High
Population Low Income Persons, Persons with Physical Disabilities, Non-housing Community Development
Geographic Areas Affected Citywide
Associated Goals Public Facilities
Description Improve accessibility for persons with physical disabilities by identifying and repairing intersections for accessibility, mostly through curb cuts. Also providing upgrades and improvements to non-profit facilities that serve low- income households.
Basis for Relative Priority Accessibility improvements are necessary to improve the mobility of disabled persons (identified during community engagement efforts).
6 Priority Need Name Planning & Administration
Priority Level High
Population Low Income Persons, Persons with Physical Disabilities, Non-housing Community Development
Geographic Areas Affected Citywide
Associated Goals Planning & Administration
Description Planning and administration of HOME and CDBG-funded activities.
Basis for Relative Priority Necessary to run the programs. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 120
SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b)
Influence of Market Conditions
Table 54 –Influence of Market Conditions
Affordable
Housing Type
Market Characteristics that will influence
the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant Based Rental
Assistance (TBRA)
As discussed in the Needs Assessment, 7,745 renters and 3205 owners) pay more than 30% of their income toward housing costs, with some paying more than 50% TBRA for Non-Homeless
Special Needs
As discussed in the Needs Assessment, special needs population require affordable housing to meet the needs of families with children, persons with disabilities, and lower income households.
New Unit
Production
As discussed in the Market Assessment, there is a gap of 5,229 housing units for those earning less than 30% AMI. With a lack of developable land, acquisition is an important tool for providing affordable housing to this population.
Rehabilitation As discussed in the Market Assessment, 75% of the housing stock was built prior to 1980 and may require rehabilitation.
Acquisition, including
preservation
With a lack of vacant land, acquisition and preservation is an important tool for providing affordable units to LMI households.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 121
SP-35 Anticipated Resources – 91.215 (a)(4), 91.220 (c)(1,2) Introduction Anticipated Resources
The City of Santa Clara is estimating the following federal and local funding resources:
Table 55 –Anticipated Resources
Program
Source
of
Funds
Uses of
Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative
Description
Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income:
$
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$
CDBG Public -
Federal
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing Public
Improvements
Public Services
$930,000 $120,000 $0 $1,050,000 $4,200,000 Funds will be used for the
creation and
preservation of
affordable rental
units,
improvements in
low income
neighborhoods,
improvements to
low-
income/owner
occupied
housing, and
public services
that benefit low
income and
special needs
households.
HOME Public -
Federal
Acquisition
Homeowner
rehab
Multifamily
rental new
construction
Multifamily
rental rehab
New
construction
for ownership
TBRA
$335,000 $10,000 $320,000 $665,000 $2,660,000 Funds will enable the City to build
more Affordable
units and
continue to
provide housing
assistance (TBRA).
CHDO funds that
are set-aside for
rental housing
development
and/or rehab will
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 122
be re-
programmed for
TBRA after two
years if they are
not used for rental
development or
rehab.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 123
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied *Section update in progress
Federal funds will leverage local funds to increase project efficiencies and benefit from economies of scale.
The HOME match requirement will be met through the waiving of property taxes on past HOME -funded multi-family affordable developments. The City Affordable Housing Fund (CAHF) and the City Housing Successor Fund (CHSF) will contribute $275,697 and $250,000 respectively. These funds will be used to fund case management services for the City’s Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program and other case management services. General Funds may be used to augment other public service activities.
Other Federal Grant Programs
Additional federal programs that fund community development and affordable housing activities include:
Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program; Section 202; Section 811; and Affordable Housing Program (AHP) through the Federal Home Loan Bank. These programs are provided by Santa Clara County Housing Authority and affordable housing developers.
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
*Section update in progress
The City owns the following properties that have potential for development of low income and special needs housing: 1) Fire Station #6 at 3575 De La Cruz Boulevard, 2).
BAREC: The City executed a Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA) with Core Affordable Housing, LLC for the BAREC site. The affordable units will be 165 senior units.
2330 Monroe Street: The City has entered into an Exclusive Negotiation Rights Agreement (ENA) with Freebird Development Company, LLC. The proposed development will have 65 mixed-income units with 11 set-aside for households with developmental disabilities. The project will be 100% affordable units.
3575 De La Cruz: The City Council has approved negotiations to enter into an Exclusive Negotiation Rights Agreement (ENA) with Habitat for Humanity East Bay/Silicon Valley. The proposed development will be 13 100% affordable, for-sale townhomes.
Discussion
HUD allocations are critical to overcoming barriers; however, it is not sufficient to address all the needs of LMI households. Therefore, the City will continue to continue to leverage other funding sources to provide services to populations in need.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 124
SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215 (k)
Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its ConPlan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions.
Table 56 –Institutional Delivery Structure
Responsible Entity Responsible
Entity Type
Role Geographic
Area Served
City of Santa Clara
Government
Economic Development, Homelessness, Non-
homeless, special needs, Ownership, Planning,
Rental Neighborhood improvements, Public
facilities, Public Services
Jurisdiction
County of Santa Clara Office
of Supportive Housing
Continuum
of Care
Homelessness, Non-homeless, Special Needs,
Planning Region
Project Sentinel Non-profit Planning, Rental Region
Santa Clara County Housing
Authority
PHA Ownership, Public Housing Rental Region
Bill Wilson Center Non-profit Homelessness, Public Services Region The Health Trust Non-profit Public Services Region
SV Independ. Living Center Non-profit Public Services Region Catholic Charities Non-profit Public Services Region
Rebuilding Together SV Non-profit Public Services Region Abode Services, Inc. Non-profit Homelessness Region
Housing Assistance—General
Santa Clara County, Office of Supportive Housing (OSH). OSH administers CDBG Program funding to unincorporated areas of Santa Clara County. Additionally, OSH is the County Continuum of Care (CoC).
OSH presides over the Coordinated Entry system, conducts outreach throughout the County, and administers Vulnerability Index-Service Prioritization Decision Assessment Tools (VI-SPDAT) that assesses the best type of housing intervention for households and adds them to community queue for housing programs. Housing programs to address homelessness run by OSH include:
Permanent Supportive Housing. Program houses chronically homeless with barriers such as mental health issues or disabilities. On-site supportive services include case management, behavioral health care, and streamlined benefits access. There are 4,056 permanent supportive housing units with another 545 in the pipeline, according to OSH’s State of the Supportive Housing System 2023. Interim Housing Solutions. Emergency shelters and transitional housing provided through OSH exist throughout the county. Additionally, the Pedro Street interim housing program assists homeless men and women who are waiting for supportive housing units under construction. Pedro Street assists 80 people. OSH manages cold weather shelters in Gilroy, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale. 19,575 people were placed in temporary housing and shelter in 2023. Special Initiatives. Project Welcome Home serves 150-200 homeless individuals who are the most frequent users of emergency services, mental health facilities, and jails. The County utilizes Palantir, a software company, to identify the highest need utilizers. These individuals receive intensive 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 125
support in partnership with OSH and Adobe Services. OSH also oversees the Santa Clara County Employment Initiative that connects eligible low-income individuals with high growth industries and job training.
Homeless Prevention System. Assists 2,500 households per year, connecting households with other safety net services and resources.
Neighborhood Conservation and Improvement Program (NCIP). Under the direction of the City of Santa Clara Housing & Community Services Division, NCIP is a housing rehabilitation program to improve habitability for owners at or below 80% County median income. Grants of up to $25,000 are available.
Below Market Purchase Program (BMP). This program sells homes available below market rate to qualified low- and moderate-income households in the City of Santa Clara.
Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley. This organization helps provide repairs to homes and community facilities. Additionally, they help make accessibility modifications for low-income homeowners.
Rebuilding Together has assisted 285 households in Santa Clara County in 2023.
SCCHA Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program serves those between 0%-30% AMI and 30%-50% AMI. SCCHA owns seven affordable housing projects within the City, including:
Bracher Senior Housing, a 72-unit senior housing complex for seniors under 50% AMI; Deborah Drive Apartments, a four-unit public housing complex for families under 30% AMI; Eklund Garden Apartments, a 16-unit apartment complex for those under 30%AMI; John Burns Garden Apartments, a 100-unit senior housing complex for seniors under 50%AMI; Klamath Gardens Apartments, a 17-unit apartment complex for families under 50% AMI; Miramar Way Apartments, a 16-unit apartment complex for families under 50% AMI; and Rivertown Apartments, a 100-unit apartment complex for families under 60% AMI
Homeless—Healthcare
The Valley Homeless Healthcare Program (VHHP) is part of the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and provides medical services to homeless individuals, including primary care and urgent care. VHHP also manages a Medical Respite program for homeless individuals discharged from hospitals as well as a Backpack Homeless Health Care Program for those in encampments. The County Social Services Agency has expedited the review process of homeless household CalFresh applications so that they may receive benefits within three days.
Homeless—Prevention Services
Homeless Prevention System. Overseen by OSH, has a $30 million annual budget and capacity to serve 2,500 households. Partners deliver temporary financial assistance, legal support, and case management to prevent homelessness.
Counseling/Advocacy.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 126
Community Plan Implementation Team. Members of the CoC and other community stakeholders meet quarterly to evaluate progress toward, identify gaps in homeless services, establish funding priorities, and pursue an overall systematic approach to address homelessness.
Legal Assistance.
Project Sentinel. Provides fair housing counseling and tenant-landlord dispute resolution to prevent evictions. The Fair Housing Center investigated 409 complaints of discrimination in 2023. Staff provided education and referrals on 1,172 calls. For dispute resolution services, staff educated 8,512 tenants about their rights through workshops, seminars, and one-on-one counseling. Senior Adult Legal Assistance. Provides legal aid to older adults in Santa Clara County. SALA assists with elder abuse, termination of public benefits, and sheriff’s evictions.
Rental Assistance.
Housing Trust Silicon Valley partners with the city to pay for security deposits and utility assistance to those who are chronically homeless or at risk of homelessness LifeMoves participants in the Santa Clara County Emergency Assistance Network, providing one-time emergency financial assistance to those in need.
Adobe Services. Adobe provides Tenant-Based Rental Assistance in the City for 20 households, according to the City of Santa Clara 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan Utilities Assistance.
Rate Assistance Program (RAP) provides a discount off the electric portion of the Municipal Utilities bill to income-qualified Santa Clara residents.
California Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP). Offers income-eligible residents of the City of Santa Clara a credit to their utility bill. California Low Income Household Water Assistance Program (LIHWAP). Provides financial assistance to low-income residents of the City of Santa Clara to help manage their residential water utility costs.
Homeless—Street Outreach
Law enforcement.
Law enforcement approaches encampment clear outs with community resources, notification of clear out with at least 72-hour notice, coordination with third-party vendors to conduct clear out, tagging personal property
Other.
Adobe Services has a five-member outreach team that targets high-needs individuals with mental health challenges. They put them in the housing queue and connect the individuals to other services while they wait for housing.
Dignity on Wheels. Dignity on Wheels offers hot showers, free laundry, and support services every Thursday on Bassett Street.
Bill Wilson Center. Outreach specialists explore locations to find and connect with homeless youth. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 127
Alcohol/Drug Abuse.
Santa Clara County Behavioral Health Services offers substance use treatment services for adults and older adults that have substance use and mental health needs. Services are available in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Vietnamese, and Tagalog and include:
Withdrawal management services, including residential detoxification; Residential treatment that includes group, individual, and family counseling; Recovery services that include recovering coaching, relapse prevention, and linkages to housing, transportation, job training, and education;
Transitional housing for clients engaged in outpatient treatment and need a safe space or temporary housing.
Child Care.
The Santa Clara County Childcare Resource and Referral (R&R) Program offers information about childcare availability and options. They also offer the Santa Clara County Childcare Portal, a database with more than 2,000 providers
California Alternative Payment Program (AP) allows income-eligible parents to access Alternative Payment Vouchers for childcare. In Santa Clara County, Choices for Children and Go Kids, Inc. coordinate AP vouchers CalWorks cash aid recipients can receive assistance with paying for childcare if employed or participating in county approved Welfare-to-Work activities.
Education.
Santa Clara Unified School District Adult Education Center. Helps students develop a “welfare to work” plan and provides career advising, job placement, resumé development, and interviewing skills to students. The Adult Education Center also serves homeless individuals with job training and housing.
Employment/Training.
LifeMoves offers career skills development, resume workshops, and job search support for homeless individuals. They also offer children’s education and childcare within family shelters, health and wellness workshops, and financial literacy programs to clients (services San Mateo and Santa Clara County).
HIV/AIDS.
Health Trust AIDS Services (THTAS). This program serves persons living with HIV/AIDS in the County. THTAS receives and administers contract funding for its housing subsidy program (Housing for Health) from HOPWA and HOPWA-PSH from the City of San José (grantee) and the County General Funds through the Public Health Department. In addition to tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA), these contracts include placement and support services provided by case managers, registered nurses and social workers for more medically acute clients. The Health Trust served 13,456 individuals throughout the county with food and nutrition services, housing services, and HIV/AIDS services.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 128
Domestic violence survivors.
Next Door Solutions Domestic Violence Shelter. Provides emergency shelter and support services, 24 hour domestic hotline, housing services, crisis counseling, legal and self-sufficiency services. The 24/7 emergency hotline answered 14,526 calls, the crisis shelter provided beds to 4,285 individuals, 2,262 clients received counseling services from crisis advocates, and 182 households received long term housing assistance in 2021.
Mental health counseling.
Bill Wilson Center. CDBG funds were provided to the Bill Wilson Center to provide case management services to Transitional Age Youth, including, but not limited to those exiting foster care, and victims of human trafficking.
County Behavioral Health Services Department (BHS) has multiple programs to connect homeless individuals with housing or shelter assistance. BHS also treats those going through behavioral health crises
Homeless—Supportive Housing
Bill Wilson Center. This center provides numerous housing services, including:
College student housing for college students who lack housing or are couch surfing; Here4You call center hotline helps match people to emergency shelters and provides people with transportation to get to shelters, referrals and linkages to community resources based on client needs Short-term housing to bridge the gap of securing permanent affordable housing for homeless youth (18- 24)
LGBTQ Transitional Living Program that provides safe environment for LGBTQ+ individuals 18-21. Helps clients find permanent, safe, and stable housing, gain employment skills, address mental health and substance abuse problems, and develop support systems.
Maternity transitional living program for homeless pregnant and parenting youth ages 18-21 Non-traditional family services offers medium to long-term stabilization for young adult families ages 18-
24. Clients receive rental assistance, housing relocation, stabilization services, and case management.
Peacock Commons serve young families 18-24 years old who have experienced chronic homelessness, are at-risk of becoming homeless, aging out of foster care, or are victims of domestic violence Rapid re-housing to help families avoid homelessness regardless of employment, income, criminal record, or sobriety
Safety net shelter for youth 12-17 who are homeless. Clients must participate in school, recreational activities, counseling, and chores.
Transitional Housing Placement Program for foster youth 16-18 Veterans
Santa Clara County Office of Veterans Services. Provides services to veterans, their dependents, and survivors.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 129
Justice Involved
The County Reentry Resource Center (RRC) provides services to those who have been previously incarcerated and to individuals who are homeless upon release. Services include referrals to drug treatment, housing assistance, food assistance, counseling, and other benefits. From 2012 to 2022, the reentry center has assisted 20,000 unique clients with housing assistance, food, healthcare, identification, employment assistance, substance abuse treatment, mental health services, and legal assistance.
Persons returning from mental and physical health institutions—Supportive Housing Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) are non-medical facilities that provide a level of care that includes assistance with activities of daily living, such as bathing and grooming. These facilities serve persons 60 years and older and persons under 60 years with certain circumstances. The City has 208 RCFE beds available for elderly persons (Facility Search Welcome) Medical Respite Program. This program provides a place for persons experiencing homelessness to heal after they have been in the hospital. Located within the HomeFirst Shelter in San Jose, the Medical Respite has 20 beds with semi-private, double occupancy rooms. The team is made of a medical doctor, pharmacist, psychiatrist, psychologist, social workers, community health workers, substance use counselors, and nurses. The team works together to meet the physical, mental, and social needs of the clients.
The County Social Services Agency has expedited the review process of homeless household CalFresh applications so that they may receive benefits within three days.
Santa Clara County Behavioral Health Services Department (BHS) has multiple programs to connect homeless individuals with housing or shelter assistance. BHS also treats those going through behavioral health crises.
Seniors and persons with disabilities
Senior Nutrition Program (SNP). County of Santa Clara provides meals through the SNP that are approved by registered dietitians. Meals can be delivered and there are free rides to 35 different dine-in sites across the county.
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center (SVILC). SVILC provides information and referrals regarding independent living facilities, independent living skills trainings, self-advocacy training, housing referrals, home modifications, emergency financial assistant, assistive technology, transition assistance from nursing home or institution into integrated community-based living, benefits counseling, and an accessible computer lab.
Live Oak Adult Day Services. Provides a structured day program for seniors. The day program is designed to help caregivers go to work and finish errands while providing support to seniors with cognitive or physical impairments.
Catholic Charities – Ombudsman Program. Assists low-income seniors in long-term care facilities with an Ombudsman who will work to resolve client problems and bring about changes to improve their care.
Heart of the Valley Services for Seniors. Assists adults 62 years and older with home modifications, disaster preparedness, handyman work/ support with household chores, and transportation services.
Heart of Valley assisted 477 clients in Santa Clara County, with over half in the City of Santa Clara. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 130
HOPE Services. Provides services to people with developmental disabilities and mental health needs.
Services include day services, training and employment, mental health services, and community living services that support clients ability to live independently. HOPE Services serves over 4,000 clients annually.
Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System
*Section update in progress
The delivery systems established to provide social and human services are far and wide reaching. The City manages its CDBG funds with direction from City Council and support from the local community in efforts to influence local housing and economic development.
The Office of Supportive Housing provides coordination and strategies to address homelessness, a regional issue that requires inter-jurisdictional cooperation.
Project Sentinel provides fair housing services to low-income households throughout the City and SCCHA provides Section 8 tenant assistance, project -based assistance, and operate several affordable housing complexes.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 131
Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services
Table 57 –Homeless Prevention Services Summary
Homelessness
Prevention Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted to
Homeless
Targeted to
People with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy X X X
Legal Assistance
Mortgage Assistance
Rental Assistance X X X
Utilities Assistance
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement X
Mobile Clinics X X
Other Street Outreach Services X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse
Child Care
Education X X
Employment and Employment Training X X
Healthcare
HIV/AIDS
Life Skills
Mental Health Counseling X X
Transportation
Other
Other
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)
Several non-profit organizations operating within the County provide housing opportunities and support services to those experiencing homelessness, including shelters, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 132
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above
*Section update in progress
The CoC adopted the Community Plan to End Homelessness in Santa Clara County ( 2020-2025), which creates a community-wide roadmap to end homelessness. It was created through a series of community summits related to specific homeless populations in the County. The Plan identifies strategies to address the needs of homeless persons in the County, including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth. The Plan aims to implement the following three steps:
1. Disrupt Systems: Develop disruptive strategies and innovative prototypes that transform the systems related to housing homeless people;
2. Build the Solution: Secure the right amount of funding needed to provide housing and services to those who are homeless and those at risk of homelessness; and
3. Serve the Person: Adopt an approach that recognizes the need for client-centered strategies with different responses for different levels of need and different groups, targeting resources the specific individual or household.
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs
*Section update in progress
The City continues to leverage local, state, and federal funding sources to meet the needs of homeless individuals living with the City, including case management and housing assistance. The City also works with Abode to pay for security deposits and utility assistance to those who are chronically homeless or at risk of homelessness.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 133
SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215 (k)
Goals Summary Information
Table 58 –Goals Summary
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
CDBG: Homeowner
$2,550,000 housing rehab.
200
1 Affordable
Housing 2025 2029 Affordable
Housing Citywide Affordable
Housing
HOME:
$250,00
Rental units
rehabilitated
2 HOME: TBRA
$2,992,500 125 households
CDBG: Homelessness
$150,000 Prevention
150
2 Homelessness 2025 2029 Homeless Citywide Homelessness
CDBG: Public Service
$900,000 Activities Other
than Low/Mod.
Income Housing
and Housing
Benefit
3 Public
Services
2020
2025
Non-
Homeless
Special Needs
Citywide Public
Services
4 Fair Housing
2020
2025
Non-
Homeless
Special Needs
Citywide
Fair Housing
HOME:
$125,000
Public Service
Activities Other
than Low/Mod.
Income Housing
Benefit
150
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 134
Table 61 –Goals Summary (cont’d)
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
5 Public
Facilities
2020
2025
Homeless
and
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide
Public
Facilities
CDBG:
$600,000
Public Facility or
Infrastructure
Activities for Low/
Mod. Housing
Benefit
1000
CDBG:
$1,050,000
6 Admin. &
Planning 2020 2025 Admin. &
Planning Citywide N/A
N/A
HOME:
$207,500
Goal Descriptions
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Affordable Housing
Goal
Description
Assist in the creation and preservation of affordable housing for low income and special needs households through continuation of the NCIP program, rental habilitation of units occupied by low income tenants, TBRA rental subsidies, and new construction. 2 Goal Name Homelessness
Goal
Description
Support activities, consistent with Continuum of Care strategies, to prevent and end homelessness. This includes building affordable housing for people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness as well as the provision of support services. 3 Goal Name Public Services
Goal
Description
Support activities that provide basic needs to lower income households and special needs populations. Services would be provided to low-income households, elderly individuals, homeless persons, people with disabilities, and victims of domestic violence. 4 Goal Name Fair Housing
Goal
Description
Promote fair housing choice, through the following activities: fair housing education, fair housing testing, housing assistance hotline, and landlord -tenant mediation. 5 Goal Name Public Facilities
Goal
Description
Improve accessibility for persons with physical disabilities by identifying and repairing intersections for accessibility, mostly through curb cuts. Improve non-profit facilities in order to better serve low-income and special needs populations. 6 Goal Name Administration
Goal
Description
Provide management, planning and implementation of the City’s CDBG & HOME programs as well as monitoring of public services and housing projects.
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
*Section update in progress
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 135
SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215 (c) Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement)
Not applicable.
Activities to Increase Resident Involvements
SCCHA incorporates resident input into the decision -making process though the involvement of tenant commissioners and board members. SCCHA has 2 positions for residents on the Board of Commissioners to ensure representation. SCCHA also operates a Family Self Sufficiency Program designed so residents can be involved in the development of self-sufficiency goals, job training, and other services. A resident survey is circulated to SCCHA tenants every 3 years to assess household experiences.
Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902?
No.
Plan to remove the ‘troubled’ designation
Not applicable.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 136
SP-55 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.215 (h)
Barriers to Affordable Housing
The City has identified multiple constraints or barriers to the affordable housing and residential investment in its 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, including:
Governmental constraints
Land use controls and development standards. While land use controls help to maintain the quality of the city’s residential neighborhoods, they can be viewed as constraints in that they determine the amount of land to be developed for housing and establish a limit on the number of units that can be built on a site. The City’s standards have not been changed substantially since 1969;
Residential development standards. The City’s Zoning Ordinance contains development standards for each zoning district, including minimum lot sizes, setbacks, widths, densities, and restrictions on building and landscape coverage.
Parking standards. Parking can substantially add to the cost of housing. The City’s Zoning Ordinance currently requires two spaces per unit in both single-family and multi-family districts.
Planning and development fees. The City and other agencies assess a number of fees that affect the development of and cost of housing. Compared to other county jurisdictions, the City’s fees for residential projects are considered moderate.
On- and off-site improvement requirements. On- and off-site improvements, including public streets, curbing, sidewalks, streetlights, water, sewer, and drainage requirements, have an impact on the cost of residential development. Improvement requirements for new developments are regulated under the Subdivision Ordinance. Off-site improvement requirements are less costly in a fully developed community since infrastructure needed to serve infill development is already in place. However, the financial burden of improvements as the City’s infrastructure ages is a concern.
Non-governmental constraints
Locally and regionally, there are several constraints that hinder the City’s ability to accommodate the community’s housing needs. The high cost of land, rising development costs, and neighborhood opposition make it expensive for developers to build affordable housing. These constraints may result in housing that is not affordable to low- and moderate-income households or may render residential construction economically infeasible for developers. While local government has little influence on larger market factors such as interest rates, its policies and regulations can act as constraints that affect both the amount of residential development that takes place and the affordability of housing. Specific constraints include:
Land Availability. In 2022, fewer than five acres of vacant parcels (including right-of-way properties) are zoned for residential or mixed use development throughout the city, including in the three focus areas for future development (El Camino Real, Lawrence Station, and Tasman East).
Community Resistance. Historically, there has been community opposition to higher density residential infill development proposed along major transportation corridors, particularly when that development is located directly adjacent to long-established single-family neighborhoods. Construction Costs. Market constraints substantially influence the cost of housing and pose a challenge to providing housing affordable for all income levels. Land prices are typically the most 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 137
significant component of the cost. The cost of land has increased rapidly over the past decade.
Construction costs and fluctuating interest rates are also major contributors to in the increasing cost of housing in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Availability of financing. The availability of financing affects a person’s ability to purchase or improve a home. The primary concern in a review of lending activity is to see whether home financing is generally available in the community. Developers of affordable housing face significant challenges in securing financing. Due to the limited possible return from rents or sales prices of affordable units, many private lenders are unable to finance affordable projects due to the rate of return. Thus, affordable developers must rely on community lending divisions, nonprofit institutions, grants and special loans, and local assistance.
Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing
The City has several policies and actions it will implement over the 2023-31 Housing Element cycle to address affordable housing barriers, including:
Policy A-3: Utilize objective design standards to streamline the housing development process; Policy A-5: Proactively plan for sufficient housing capacity through infill development that is compatible with existing neighborhoods and through the preparation of neighborhood plans that will support the development of new, complete neighborhoods. Policy B-4: Identify and potentially designate surplus land that can accommodate low, very-low, and extremely low-income residential development.
Policy D-2: Continue to utilize General Plan land use and zoning updates to provide increased opportunity and flexibility in providing a variety of housing types and tenure. Policy D-3: Periodically review the City’s ordinances, policies, and procedures and make changes to reduce or remove constraints to development.
Specific actions articulated in the City’s Housing Element meant to remove affordable housing barriers include:
Action 1(d). As part of the Zoning Ordinance Update, incorporate changes to state Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) law and incentivize the creation of ADUs by removing parking requirements and providing more flexible height standards.
Action 1(l). Report on the production of ADUs through the City’s Annual Progress Report (APR).
If the pace of ADU production falls below the level necessary to achieve 392 ADUs during the 2023-2031 planning period (approximately 49 ADUs/year), within six months of acceptance of the APR, present a plan to City Council to remove barriers and/or further incentivize ADU production (e.g., through additional Zoning changes).
Action 1(n)(6). Adopt a General Plan Text Amendment to increase the density limit for Very Low Density Residential parcels from up to 10du/ac to 14 du/ac. These lower density residential parcels are generally located in higher income and higher resourced parts of the city. Action 3(c). Apply reduced parking requirements for transit-rich environments from the Zoning Ordinance Update to proposed long-range plans.
Action 3(d). Reduce residential parking requirements outside of transit-rich environments by reducing the amount of parking required for studio and one-bedroom apartments in multi-family zones.
Action 3(j). Review best practices once per year with regional working groups to identify 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 138
appropriate incentives and polices to support affordable housing development in the city including fee deferral, reduction, or waivers.
Action 9(a). Complete the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, including:
o Provide for by-right approval of a variety of housing types o Further reduce use of Planned Developments (PDs) by including new high-density residential and mixed-use zoning districts that conform to the General Plan and by allowing by-right approvals that meet objective development standards o Allow by-right expansion of single-family homes built with non-conforming side setbacks and/or one-car garages.
o Revamp residential parking requirements, including unbundling and make appropriate reductions in parking requirements according to housing type (i.e., reduced parking requirements for units for people with development and other disabilities) and reducing residential parking requirements outside of transit-rich environments by reducing the amount of parking required for studio and one-bedroom apartments in multi-family zones. o Apply adopted zoning designations to the City’s Zoning map, consistent with the City’s General Plan, which will add additional housing sites totaling 1,039 units of capacity to the El Camino Real corridor.
o Remove coverage maximums in the R3 and R4 districts and increase coverage maximums from 45% to 60% in the R2 district.
o In addition to exempting ADUs/JADUs from providing parking, do not require replacement parking for JADUs that convert a garage space/s for the primary dwelling. Action 9(b). Monitor the Zoning Ordinance, including land use controls (e.g., setbacks, height, lot coverage, etc.), for any potential constraints to the development of housing, particularly housing for persons with special needs (including those with developmental disabilities), and amend the Zoning Ordinance to address those constraints. Action 11. The City charges various impact fees to provide essential services and facilities to serve new development. The City will conduct an impact fee study to compare the City’s fees with surrounding and similar jurisdictions.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 139
SP-60 Homeless Strategy – 91.215 (d)
The 2020 -2025 Community Plan to End Homelessness serves as the County’s roadmap for ending homelessness in the County of Santa Clara. The focus of this program (which was adopted by the Housing Element) is to report outcomes for the implementing programs that help the County and overall community meet the goals of the Community Plan.
The County identified the following objectives for this program:
House approximately 3,200 people annually through the implementation of the Community Plan to End Homelessness. Assuming the current reduction rate and the number of people served annually, the County projects a total of 25,600 people receiving housing by 2031. The County’s progress since 2020 is as follows:
13,817 people connected to stable housing;
19,575 people placed in temporary housing and shelter; 28,235 people received homelessness prevention assistance. Annually convene the strategy leads to develop annual focused implementation plans and seek approval from the Continuum of Care (CoC) Executive Board on the priorities for annual workplans. This includes, but is not limited to, the supportive housing system improvement work, supporting the work of the Lived Experience Advisory Board to improve service delivery, and the coordinated entry redesign work. Collectively these efforts are intended to continuously improve how unhoused individuals and families are served through the Santa Clara County Supportive Housing System.
In 2025, initiate the process to update the Community Plan to En d Homelessness and seek approval from the CoC Board on the community outreach and stakeholder engagement plan.
Once a draft is developed, seek endorsement from the Board of Supervisors, the 15 incorporated cities, the Santa Clara County Housing Authority, the Valley Transportation Authority, the Santa Clara Valley Water Board, the various School and College Districts and other governmental and non-governmental partners. (The County intends to complete the draft plan by September 2025 for adoption of the plan in January 2026.)
In 2026, once the new Community Plan to End Homelessness is in place, seek approval from each city on the development of a local implementation plan in which OSH will offer technical assistance and support either directly or through a consultant.
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The City of Santa Clara is committed to addressing the needs of homeless persons and implementing strategies and programs to prevent low income households and special needs populations from entering homelessness. Over the next five years, the City will continue to allocate resources and implement strategic goals to support homeless persons and families and to prevent and end homelessness where possible.
The County of Santa Clara conducts outreach to homeless persons to assess their individual needs and connect them to services and resources through the Office of Supportive Housing’s (OSH) Client Engagement Team which provides outreach servi ces to homeless persons across the County. Team members connect with unsheltered persons to discuss and explain housing opportunities available to them 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 140
and to connect them to the supportive housing programs available through Coordinated Assessment.
Outreach is also coordinated by the Emergency Assistance Network (EAN) which is comprised of United Way Silicon Valley, eight partner agencies, and seven law enforcement agencies that create a safety net of essential services.
The Community Plan to End Homelessness includes a set of strategies that will expand on these current and ongoing efforts. The strategies and action items adopted as part of the plan that contribute to the strategic plan goals to improve homeless outreach include but are not limited to:
Increase shelter outreach, hygiene services, and transportation options to match the needs of unsheltered residents.
Increase access to basic hygiene resources, including bathrooms, showers, and laundry; and increase the number of free public transit passes and other transportation options for people who are unhoused to access services.
Increase the number of street outreach staff and case managers working in encampments and provide opportunities for people who have lived experience of homelessness t o provide peer -to- peer support.
Increase the number of mobile crisis teams with clinical staff, and expand their hours, to support individuals experiencing severe mental health and substance use crises. Increase outreach to city and County staff and busine ss and neighborhood associations about available resources to assist people who are unhoused.
Create a referral system where unhoused residents can access information and services, such as available temporary housing and homeless services.
The County will continue homeless outreach services to assess the unique needs of homeless persons and families through the strategies, programs, and policies developed as part of the County’s Housing Element and Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). Between 2023 and 2031, th e County will continue to conduct outreach services and assess the individual needs of homeless persons and families through the following programs and action items.
Improve the quality of life of unsheltered individuals by expanding the capacity of tempo rary housing programs and providing basic needs services to individuals experiencing unsheltered homelessness.
Continue to support community -based organizations that provide services to the unhoused population.
Continue to support feedback mechanisms that provide those with lived experience the opportunity to inform and shape improvements to the Supportive Housing System and the delivery of services. Increase access to opportunity for residents of historically disinvested low income communities by increasing the number of free public transit passes and other transportation options for unhoused people to access services and by studying access to services in South County including the Cities of Morgan Hill, Gilroy, San Martin, and parts of the unincorporated County. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 141
Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
The City of Santa Clara conducts homeless outreach through several initiatives and methods to assess their individual needs, connect them to resources, and to improve the City and County’s overall approach to meeting the needs of homeless persons. The City’s Police Department includes a Community Response Team which conducts outreach while not in uniform to respond to crises, connect homeless persons to existing services, and to facilitate housing assessments with partnering agencies.
Law enforcement officers are also responsible for leading encampment clear-outs by providing notifications of clear-outs (at least 72 hours in advance), coordinating with third-party vendors to conduct the clear-out, tagging personal property, and connecting individuals with community resources after they are mandated to relocate. Adobe Services also conducts street outreach in Santa Clara City through their five-member outreach team which focuses on high need individuals with mental health challenges. Individuals are placed in a housing queue and are connected to resources and services while they wait for housing placement.
Additionally, the Community Response Team and the Housing and Community Services Division administer grants to several local agencies that offer services to homeless persons including: WeHope Dignity on Wheels Mobile Shower and Laundry Service, Santa Clara County HPS, Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence, Emergency Housing Consortium, St. Justin Community Ministry, Bill Wilson Center, Abode Services, and case management for permanent supportive housing clients.
The City will expand on these efforts by implementing the priorities, objectives, and strategies outlined in the Plan to Reduce Homelessness and Its Impacts which will serve as the City’s roadmap to address the needs of homeless persons and families in Santa Clara City. Strategies and actions to improve homeless outreach adopted by the City are highlighted below.
Priority Area 2. Increase availability of short-term shelter, permanent supportive housing, and Extremely Low Income (ELI) housing. The City will: 1) create new shelter and housing that is affordable and accessible to people experiencing or at risk of homelessness; 2) use all tools available to increase housing affordability; and 3) reduce opposition to new development at all stages. The strategies adopted by the City include:
Add 136 new emergency shelter, interim housing, rapid rehousing, or shared supportive housing beds/units to provide shelter options for unhoused residents in Santa Clara who are waiting for placement in affordable housing.
By 2031, work towards the Housing Element goal of permitting 1,436 extremely low and very low income units.
Priority Area 3: Conduct proactive street outreach to engage people who are unsheltered and connect them to resources. The City will: 1) ensure that homeless persons in the city are assessed as part of the community’s CES and connected to services to meet their health and basic needs; 2) proactively engage, develop rapport with, and house people with the highest needs in the community; 3) increase utilization of existing City and County homeless assistance resources by people experiencing homelessness; and 4) increase connections to mental health services (including crisis services) for homeless persons, especially those who have been hesitant or lack the capacity to access services.
Strategies to facilitate this priority area and these objectives include:
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 142
Fund an agency to provide street and encampment-based case management to help Santa Clara residents obtain and/or retain shelter or housing through a range of activities including but not limited to: conducting assessments; providing services to ensure households are document/housing reading; assisting clients with creating housing plans; providing services; and collecting feedback from unhoused people to improve engagement and shelter/housing/service programs.
Explore opportunities to support peer outreach that trains and employs people with lived experience of homelessness to provide street outreach and system navigation services. By 2026, improve the City’s capacity to respond faster to crises that require clinical responses or de-escalation by: 1) coordinating with partner agencies and service providers to train City staff and volunteers about crisis response and other resources; 2) creating a set of written guidelines and conducting trainings on who to call and when, conflict resolutions, and de-escalation techniques; 3) working with OSH and local jurisdictions to expand mental health outreach and crisis response which could include hiring more Crisis Intervention Specialists for the City’s Police Department; and 4) increasing coordinating with BHS to ensure outreach teams serving City residents can connect people with available services.
Priority Area 4: Address basic needs of people living outside, including health and hygiene. The City will:
1) create opportunities for engagement, connection, and trust-building with people living unsheltered by providing resources to meet basic needs and build a foundation for making progress toward housing goals; 2) address the immediate unsheltered crisis by creating spaces for people experiencing homelessness to stay, address immediate needs, and access services; and 3) improve the accessibility and experience of public areas for both housed and unhoused residents.
Strategies to facilitate this priority area and related objectives include:
By December 2025, explore partnerships with businesses, nonprofits, faith-based, and volunteer organizations to leverage funding, facilities, expertise, and staffing to support provision of basic need services such as food, hygiene supplies and services, and restrooms for unsheltered people.
For example: donation drives, volunteer days or programs, and/or community events to connect housed and unhoused community members.
Establish safe and welcoming places for people living in unsheltered situations to access during the day with access to restrooms, computers, phones, and services. The City will aim to establish additional options beyond parks and libraries.
Additionally, the City of Santa Clara will address the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons by supporting and encouraging the development of housing types that serve homeless persons and families. The City’s Housing Element commits staff to increasing access to interim housing units, rapid rehousing, and emergency shelter beds by 30% from 453 units in 2023 to 589 units by 2030. (The City adopted this objective as part of Action 1: Provision of a Variety of Housing Types.) To achieve this objective, the City is currently updating the Zoning Ordinance. As part of implementing Action 9 (Zoning Ordinance), the City will:
Complete a comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance to include provisions that allow emergency shelters by right without discretionary action in select residential, commercial, and mixed-use districts.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 143
Adopt a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the definition of emergency shelter to include other interim interventions including but not limited to a navigation center, bridge housing, and respite or recuperative care; and to revise the Emergency Shelters, Development and Operational Standards section to remove the separation of uses standard.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and fa milies, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again.
Over the next five years, the City of Santa Clara is committed to helping unhoused persons transition from homelessness to permanent housing by adopting and implementing the City’s 2024 Homelessness Response Plan which six priority areas for City staff to respond to the unique needs of homeless persons and families and to address and reduce the impacts of homelessness on the wider community.
As part of developing these priority areas, the City identified related objectives and strategies to address and reduce homelessness in the City of Santa Clara. Objectives, strategies, and actions that will assist City staff in helping homeless persons enter permanent housing situations include but are not limited to:
Create new shelter and housing that is affordable and accessible to people experiencing or at risk of homelessness.
Proactively engage, develop rapport with, and ultimately house people with the highest needs in the community.
Leverage collective community resources to create efficient and impactful interventions. Ensure that people experiencing homelessness in the city are assessed as part of the community’s Coordinated EntrySystem (CES) and connected to other services to meet their health and basic needs wherever possible.
Provide housing problem solving services to determine if there are ways too quickly resolve and/or avoid entering homelessness or rapidly exit homelessness through conflict resolution, mediation, one-time financial assistance, relocation and other activities.
County/Regional efforts. The Santa Clara County Continuum of Care’s (CoC) strategy to help homeless persons (especially those with special needs) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, facilitate access to affordable housing, and to prevent individuals and families from re -entering homelessness are implemented by the County’s 2020-2024 Community Plan to End Homelessness which includes a three -part strategy to end homelessness in Santa Clara County and jurisdictions. These strategies include: 1) addressing the root causes of homelessness through system and policy changes; 2) expand homelessness prevention and housing programs to meet the need; and 3) improve the quality of life for unsheltered individuals and create healthy neighborhoods for all.
The actions that contribute to the County’s strategic plan goals include:
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 144
Protect residents from evictions, displacement, and housing discrimination by adopting and implementing new fair housing plans for the region; providing legal assistance to ensure that individuals and families most severely impacted by the lack of affordable housing (peopl e of color) have equal access to housing; and by strengthening local rent control and tenant protections.
Provide a broad range of supports to prevent homelessness by expanding the Homelessness Prevention System (HPS) to prevent homelessness for an additio nal 7,000 households who are at risk by providing targeted financial assistance and supportive services; and by providing targeted financial resources to prevent homelessness and eviction for severely rent burdened residents living in existing affordable units.
Expand the supportive housing system to provide housing and services to help 20,000 unhoused people secure stable, permanent housing by targeting 7,000 people in permanent supportive housing programs that provide long -term support; 10,000 people hou sed through rapid re - housing programs that provide short - and medium -term support; and 3,000 people housed through Housing Problem Solving and other short-term or one-time assistance. Develop programs tailored to the needs of specific populations of person s experiencing homelessness including youth and young adults, older adults (55+) and seniors, families with children, and adults (25 to 54 years) without children.
The County will continue to help homeless persons and families make the transition to perman ent housing and independent living through the programs, policies, and strategies identified by the County’s 2023-2031 Housing Element.
Program 1.23. City Revenue Agreements. The County of Santa Clara has pooled resources from various cities to expand the capacity of the Supportive Housing System and to increase the efficiency of existing partnerships while reducing the duplication of services throughout the County. The programs supported by these revenue funding sources are aligned with the goals of the 2020-2025 Community Plan to End Homelessness and promote racial equity in homeless services by increasing the availability of community-based supportive services throughout the County of Santa Clara. As part of this program, the County identified the following objectives:
Serve 20 households from the City of Santa Clara and 20 households from the City of Mountain View with permanent supportive housing services and rental assistance. Assuming funding continues annually through 2031, these Revenue Agreements would serve 360 households. Serve 133 vehicle dwellers from the City of Mountain View by providing homeless households a temporary, overnight, safe location to park, as well as case management support. Assuming funding continues annually through 2031, thi s Revenue Agreement would serve 1,197 vehicle dwellers.
Serve 400 homeless households from San Jose through a centralized hotline for individuals and families seeking shelter services or shelter diversion services. Assuming funding continues annually through 2031, this Revenue Agreement would serve 3,600 homeless households from San Jose.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 145
Provide supportive services for 180 chronically homeless households from San Jose. Assuming funds continues annually through 2031, this Revenue Agreement would serve 1,620 chronically homeless households from San Jose.
It is important to note that during the community engagement conducted to inform the City’s Plan, service providers who participated in focus groups emphasized a need for the City to implement a strategy focused on investing and providing services that prevent individuals and families from slipping back into homelessness. Participants explained that many individuals do not have the resources, connections, and/or social supports required to remain stably housed after entering housing and often become homeless after having been housed. Providers in focus groups strongly recommended that the City develop and implement a strategy that results in a “one stop shop” for individuals to navigate to when they need support and offered Sunnyvale Community Services as a model for City staff.
Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low- income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education or youth needs
The City of Santa Clara invests in homelessness prevention and crisis response to ensure individuals and families at-risk of homelessness have access to the resources that meet their basic needs. The City’s Plan to Reduce Homelessness identifies the following services supported by the City and provided by community partners:
The City contributes $50,000 per year to the County of Santa Clara’s Homeless Prevention System which is comprise of a network of 20 community partners working to stabilize housing for at-risk households.
In partnership with Abode Services, the City funds a Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program of over $1,000,000 each year to provide housing assistance in the form of deposits and rental subsidies for up to 12 months. The program also provides case management services to homeless families with children, households fleeing domestic violence, or families with children that are at-risk of homelessness (incomes at or below 60% AMI).
Additionally, the City supports individuals returning from institutions and systems of care through the County’s Reentry Resource Center (RRC) which provides services to residents who were previously incarcerated as well as residents who enter homelessness upon release. Services offered by RRC include referrals to drug treatment programs, housing assistance, food assistance, counseling services, and other benefits to support the transition to permanent housing. Residents are also supported by the County’s Social Service Agency which expedites the review process of CalFresh applications for homeless households to ensure they receive benefits within three days.
The City will continue these efforts by implementing the Santa Clara Plan to Reduce Homelessness and Its Impacts which includes six priority areas and related objectives and strategies to address homelessness in Santa Clara City. To help individuals and families avoid homelessness, the City adopted the following strategies:
Priority Area 1: Prevent homelessness for City residents who are at-risk. The City will: 1) reduce the inflow into homelessness among City residents at imminent risk of losing their housing; 2) reduce displacement and help 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 146
tenants relocate when needed; and 3) increase the availability and accessibility of services within the city for City residents. Strategies to facilitate these objectives include:
By December 2025, partner with the Charities Housing, CORE, Santa Clara County’s Office of Supportive Housing, Destination Home, the Housing Authority and others to reduce rent burden for seniors living in the Belovida apartment complex and carrying out a minor rehabilitation of the building. By 2026, increase the City’s investment in the County’s HPS to increase access to rental assistance, deposit assistance, car repair, housing problem solving, and other prevention related services for City residents.
By 2026, expand the City’s investment in TBRA to serve 10 to 20 additional households per year. By 2026, explore the implementation of policies to prevent displacement and/or facilitate a soft landing when relocation is unavoidable including but not limited to: policies that minimize displacement resulting from code enforcement; no net loss policy for income restricted affordable housing; longer notification requirements for tenants when housing will be redeveloped; landlord paid relocation benefits for tenants impacted by no cause and no-fault evictions; and creating a rental deposit cap.
27 Valley Homeless Healthcare Program(VHHP).Santa ClaraValley MedicalCenter.https://www.scvmc.org/clinics-and-locations/Valley- Homeless-Health-Program/Pages/overview.aspx
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 147
SP-65 Lead Based Paint (LBP) Hazards – 91.215 (i)
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards
The City follows all applicable Lead-Based Paint Regulations, which primarily affect projects funded by the Neighborhood Conservation Improvement Program (NCIP).
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? Three quarters of homes in the City were built before 1980. Homes built before 1980 may contain LBP.
Forty-five percent of households (19, 915) are LMI. Using this proport ion, 14,936 LBP households are potentially occupied by LMI families.
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?
The City, as part of its NCIP, requires that all lead paint be controlled or abated and disposed of properly to eliminate or reduce the hazard of environmental or human contamination. 2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 148
SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215 (j)
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families
*Section update in progress
The community engagement process identified the El Camino Real area to be in need of neighborhood revitalization. Economic development funds will be targeted to the El Camino Real Focus Area, a low - income area of the City. The City will also continue to fund emergency assistance services for homeless persons and persons at risk of homelessness.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan?
*Section update in progress
Many organizations within the region work to reduce poverty within the City, including:
North County Consortium of Neighborhood Self Sufficiency Centers, which supports the sustainability and self-sufficiency for CalWorks families;
Santa Clara Unified School District Adult Education Center, which helps students develop a “welfare to work” plan and provides career advising, job placement, resumé development, and interviewing skills to students. The Adult Education Center also serves homeless individuals with job training and housing;
SCCHA is a Moving to Work agency, which allows programs that focus on self -sufficiency and affordable housing.
2025-2030 City of Santa Clara Consolidated Plan 149
SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
*Section update in progress
The City enters into subrecipient agreements with grantees. These agreements set forth the terms for grant management and compliance with required state and federal laws. The City works with multiple public service programs funded by CDBG and HOME, which have an excellent track record with the use of these funds. The City performs on-site monitoring of these programs at least once per agreement period, and the public service programs must report to the City at least twice per year.
Community Engagement – Appendix B-
150
Community Engagement Summary – Appendix A
County of
Santa Clara
2020-2025
Consolidated Plan
Community
Engagement Summary
CPC engagement overview and survey analysis in progress.
Public Comment – Appendix C
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 1
2025-2026
Annual Action Plan
Contents
AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220 (c) (1,2) .............................................................................................. 2 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives – 91.220(c)(3)& (e) ............................................................................. 9 AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d) ........................................................................................................................ 12 AP-38 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................ 14 AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220 (f) .............................................................................................. 22 AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220 (g) ..................................................................................................... 23 AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220 (h) ............................................................................................................ 24 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220 (i) ............................................................. 25 AP-75 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.220 (j) .................................................................................... 27 AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220 (k) .............................................................................................................. 29 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements – 91.220 (l) (1,2,4) ....................................................................... 32 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 2
AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220 (c) (1,2)
Introduction
The City of Santa Clara is estimating the following federal and local funding resources for the 2025 Program Year (PY); Fiscal Year2025-2026:
CDBG Funds: The total amount of CDBG resources expected to be available for FY25/26 is $1,050,000. This total is made up of the annual CDBG entitlement from HUD, Prior Year Resources (i.e., funds that are being re-programmed and/or funds that were programmed but not spent), and Program Income (income generated from prior CDBG projects). The breakdown of the source of funds is:
Annual Entitlement Funds $930,000
Estimated Prior Year Balance $0
Estimated FY25/26 Program Income $120,000
CDBG Contingency Language
More than expected: If the City receives more CDBG Entitlement funding than expected, funds will be used for the City Homeowner Rehabilitation Program (i.e., NCIP) and/or the Minor Repair Program. The City reserves the option to provide more funding for public services if the Public Service Cap allows for another agency to be funded to at least $30,000.
Less than expected: If the City receives less CDBG Entitlement funding than expected, the Public Service and Administration Caps will be recalculated and amounts adjusted. If the calculation results in a Public Service Cap of less than $180,00, the City will need to reduce its number of Public Service Agencies funded to come under the cap. Further, the amount allocated to the Minor Repair Program may need to be reduced.
All Program Income is placed in the Revolving Loan Fund for use in the NCIP program.
HOME Funds: The total amount of HOME resources expected to be available for FY25/26 is $665,000. This is made up of the annual HOME entitlement from HUD, Prior Year Resources (funds that are being re - programmed and/or funds that were programmed but not spent), and Program Income (income generated from prior HOME projects). The breakdown of the source of funds is:
Entitlement Funds $335,000
Estimated Prior Year Balance $320,000
Estimated FY25/26 Program Income $ 10,000*
*HOME Program Income (PI). The City estimates it will receive $100,000 in PI in the FY25/26. Ten percent; or $10,000 will be programmed in this 2025 Annual Action Plan for administrative costs as allowed by HOME regulations. The other 90% ($90,000) will be programmed next year in the 2026 Annual Action Plan.
In accordance with HOME regulations, CHDO set-aside funds not used for the set-aside purpose are allowed to be reprogrammed to other activities after two years. If the City cannot use its CHDO funds for its intended set-aside use, the City will reprogram the CHDO funds to its Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program.
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 3
HOME CONTINGENCY LANGUAGE
More than expected: If the City receives more HOME Entitlement funding than expected, the CHDO set- aside amounts and the Administration amounts will be recalculated. All remaining funds will be used for the TBRA Program.
Less than expected: If the City receives less HOME Entitlement funding than expected, the CHDO set- aside amounts and the Administration amounts will be recalculated. The TBRA program will then be reduced in funding.
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 4
LOCAL FUNDING
The HOME match requirement will be met through the waiving of property taxes on past HOME-funded multi-family affordable developments. The City also anticipates that it will leverage approximately $525,697 with local funds for programs and activities also funded with federal funds. The local funds are as follows:
General Funds: (TBD)
City Affordable Housing Funds (CAHF): $275,697
City Housing Successor Fund (CHSF): $250,000
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 5
Table 59 –Expected Resources Priority Table
Program
Source
of Funds
Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
Narrative
Description
Annual
Allocation
Program
Income
Prior Year
Resource
Total:
$ $ $ $ $
CDBG Public-
Federal
Acquisition
Housing Rehab.
Public
Improvements
Public Services
Administration
and Planning
$930,000
$120,000 $0 $1,050,000 $4,200,000 CDBG funds may be
used for: 1) Land
acquisition for
affordable housing;
2) NCIP program and
Minor Repair
Program; 3) Public
infrastructure
improvements and
other public facility
improvements; 4)
Capital
Improvements to
Affordable Housing ;
5) Public Services; 6)
Administration and
planning.
HOME Public-
Federal
CHDO and
regular HOME
rental projects,
such as property
acquisition, new
const., and/or
rehabilitation.
Tenant Based
Rental Assistance
Admin. and
Planning for
HOME programs
and activities.
Fair Housing
Services
$335,000 $10,000 $320,000 $665,000 $2,660,000 HOME funds may be used for: 1) TBRA; 2)
NCIP; 3) Rental
Development and/or
rehab; 4) Fair Housing
Services; 5) Admin. &
Planning.
City expects approx.
$100,000 of PI from
PY24/25 which is part
of the Prior Year
Resources amount.
The City estimates
approx.
$100,000 of PI in
PY25/26. $10,000 of
which will be drawn
in PY25/26 for
administration and
planning. The
remaining $90,000
will be programmed
in PY26/27.
If PI exceeds
$100,000, City will
continue using 10%
for admin.
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 6
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 7
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 8
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied *Section update in progress
Federal funds will leverage local funds to increase project efficiencies and benefit from economies of scale.
The HOME match requirement will be met through the waiving of property taxes on past HOME -funded multi-family affordable developments. The City Affordabl e Housing Fund (CAHF) and the City Housing Successor Fund (CHSF) will contribute $275,697 and $250,000 respectively. These funds will be used to fund case management services for the City’s Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) program and other case management services. General Funds may be used to augment other public service activities.
Other Federal Grant Programs
Additional federal programs that fund community development and affordable housing activities include:
Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program; Section 202; Section 811; and Affordable Housing Program (AHP) through the Federal Home Loan Bank. These programs are provided by Santa Clara County Housing Authority and affordable housing developers.
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
The City owns ? properties that have potential for development of low income and special needs housing:
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 9
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives – 91.220(c)(3)& (e)
Table 60 –Annual Goals and Objectives Summary
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
1 Affordable
Housing
2025
2026
Affordable
Housing
Citywide
Affordability:
Affordable
Housing
CDBG
$660,000
Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation and
project deliver
costs
25 households
HOME
$631,600
TBRA
20 households
CDBG Homelessness
TBD Prevention
TBD
Availability/
2 Homelessness 2025 2026 Homeless Citywide Accessibility:
Homelessness
CDBG Public Service
$180,000 Activities Other
than Low/Mod.
Income Housing
and Housing
Benefit
500
3 Public
Services
2025
2026
Non-
Homeless
Special
Needs
Citywide
Availability/
Accessibility:
Public
Services
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 10
Table 64 –Annual Goals and Objectives Summary (cont’d)
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed
Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
4 Fair Housing
2025
2026
Non-
Homeless
Special
Needs
Citywide
Availability/
Accessibility:
Fair Housing
GENERAL
$22,197
Public Service
Activities Other
than Low/Mod.
Income Housing
Benefit
Public Service
Activities for
Low/Mod. Income
Housing Benefit
100
CDBG
$210,000
5 Planning &
Admin.
2025
2026
CDBG,
HOME,
Admin.
Citywide
N/A
HOME
$33,500
N/A
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 11
Goal Description
1 Goal Name Affordable Housing
Goal
Description
Assist in the creation and preservation of affordable housing for low income and special needs households through continuation of the Neighborhood Conservation and Improvement Program, rental habilitation of units occupied by low income tenants, TBRA rental subsidies, and new construction.
2 Goal Name Homelessness
Goal
Description
Support activities, consistent with Continuum of Care strategies, to prevent and end homelessness. This includes building affordable housing for people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness as well as the provision of support services. 3 Goal Name Public Services
Goal
Description
Support activities that provide basic needs to lower income households and special needs populations. Services would be provided to low-income households, elderly individuals, homeless persons, people with disabilities, and victims of domestic violence. 4 Goal Name Fair Housing
Goal
Description
Promote fair housing choice, through the following activities: fair housing education, fair housing testing, housing assistance hotline, and landlord-tenant mediation. 5 Goal Name Public Facilities
Goal
Description
Improve accessibility for persons with physical disabilities by identifying and repairing intersections for accessibility, mostly through curb cuts. Also providing upgrades and improvements to non-profit facilities that serve low-income households. 6 Goal Name Planning & Administration
Goal
Description
Provide management, planning and implementation of the City’s CDBG & HOME programs as well as monitoring of public services and housing projects. 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 12
AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d)
Introduction
The activities that the City will undertake in FY 2025-2026 using CDBG and HOME funds include: promoting affordable housing, homeowner housing rehabilitation, remove barriers to the handicapped, funding public services for low and moderate-income residents; and program administration, as shown below. All these activities meet one or more priority needs as identified through the citizen participation process.
Table 61 –Project Information
# Project Name National Objective
To Benefit… Code Funding
1 TBD
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 13
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs The allocation of funds is based on the needs and priorities identified in the 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan.
The City prioritizes allocations of its CDBG and HOME funds to projects that serve the lowest income households, from 0-50% of Area Median Income (AMI). In addition, public services are an identified funding priority in the Consolidated Plan, and funding is recommended to organizations that provide needed services in the community.
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 14
AP-38 Project Summary
TBD
Project Summary
1 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
2 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
3 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 15
Project Summary (cont’d)
4 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
5 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
6 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 16
Project Summary (cont’d)
8 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
9 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 17
Project Summary (cont’d)
10 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
11 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
12 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 18
Project Summary (cont’d)
13 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
14 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
15 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 19
Table 67 –Project Summary (cont’d)
16 17
Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 20
Table 67 –Project Summary (cont’d)
18 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
19 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
20 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 21
20 Project Name Com
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type
of families that will benefit
from the proposed activities
Location Description
The allocation of funds is based on the needs and priorities identified in the 2025-2030 Consolidated Plan. The City prioritizes allocations of its CDBG and HOME funds to projects that serve the lowest income households, from 0-50% of Area Median Income (AMI). In addition, “Public Services” are an identified funding priority in the Consolidated Plan, and funding is recommended to organizations that provide needed services in the community.
Note: The following activities/agencies will be funded with local dollars if approved through the budget process:
TBD.
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 22
AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220 (f)
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed.
Investments will be allocated citywide for affordable housing services, capital projects, fair housing services, and public services.
Table 62 – Geographic Distribution
Target Area Percentage of funds
Citywide 100%
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically
The City does not have plans to prioritize investments geographically. HOME CHDO set-aside funds may be spent in a contiguous jurisdiction if a CHDO development cannot be identified within the City limits. 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 23
AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220 (g)
Introduction
*Section update in progress
For the purpose of this section, the term “affordable housing” is defined in the HOME regulations at 24 CFR 92.252 for rental housing and 24 CFR 92.254 for homeownership.
The City of Santa Clara has identified the production and maintenance of affordable housing as the primary objective for the expenditure of federal funds in the Consolidated Plan. While CDBG and HOME funds are limited, the City will continue to allocate funding to affordable housing projects, including owner-occupied rehabilitation. The City has non -federal funding sources that it will use toward the development of affordable housing.
Table 64 – One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported (by Population Type) Homeless – Housing assistance for units reserved for homeless individuals and households. 20 Non-Homeless – Housing assistance for all units NOT reserved for homeless individuals and households. 25 Special-Needs – Housing assistance for units reserved for households that are not homeless but require specialized housing or supportive services.
0 Total 45
Table 65 – One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through (by Program Type) Rental Assistance – Housing assistance for programs such as tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA) and one-time payments to prevent homelessness.
20 The Production of New Units – New units, including the conversion of non-residential properties.
0 Rehab of Existing Units – Rehabilitation of existing units, including reconstruction. If unit will be acquired and rehabilitated, report the unit only once.
25 Acquisition of Existing Units – Housing assistance for programs such as down payment assistance. If the unit will be acquired and rehabilitated, report the unit only once. 0 Total 45
Discussion
The City goal, as it relates to Affordable Housing, is to assist in the creation and preservation of affordable housing for low income and special needs households through continuation of the Neighborhood Conservation and Improvement Program (NCIP), rental habilitation of units occupied by low-income tenants, TBRA rental subsidies, and new construction.
25 households for Homeowner housing rehabilitation (CDBG), 05 Extremely low-income households
20 Low-income households
20 households for TBRA (HOME),
17 Extremely low-income households
03 Low-income households
01 households for CHDO Rental Housing (HOME),
01 Low-income households
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 24
AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220 (h)
Introduction
The Santa Clara County Housing Authority (SCCHA) is the regional entity that manages and maintains housing units and administers Housing Choice Voucher programs across the County. SCCHA operates four public housing units located in City of Santa Clara. The housing authority is a HUD -designated Moving to Work (MTW) agency which allows it greater flexibility to design and implement more innovative approaches to providing housing assistance.
For FY24/25, SCCHA plans to serve 18,299 households with MTW Housing Choice Vouchers, 1,270 with local, non- traditional property-based and tenant based vouchers, and 4 MTW Public Housing units leased for a total of 19,573 households served. The majority of voucher holders have a tenant-based voucher which allows the holder to use the voucher at any housing unit where the landlord will accept the voucher. Data on the number of vouchers in use within the City is unavailable.
Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership
The SCCHA has 536 tenant-based vouchers that the MTW PHA anticipates project -basing for the first time (county- wide); there are 3347 currently. The City will continue to work closely with the SCCHA to address any needs identified during the program year.
The most immediate need is finding housing units and owners that will accept vouchers. Stakeholder interviews also identified the need for assisting families moving into affordable units with basic necessities.
SCCHA re-proposed allocating project-based vouchers to SCCHA-owned projects without competition. This activity was originally proposed and approved by HUD to allow SCCHA to issue Project Based Vouchers (PBVs) to projects owned by SCCHA or a SCCHA affiliate entity without needing to go through a competitive selection process. The re-proposal of this activity would leave the original activity in place and in addition SCCHA is adopting a Housing Opportunities Through Modernization Act (HOTMA) provision that has not yet been implemented by HUD. A modification to Activity 2010-4 will allow SCCHA, at its discretion, to enter into a HAP contract for housing to be rehabilitated or newly constructed even if construction had begun without an AHAP in place.
If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance
Not applicable.
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 25
AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220 (i) Introduction
*Section in progress with new data
The 2022 Point -in-Time Count identified 10,028 homeless individuals county-wide, which was higher than the 2019 count of 9,706. Of these individuals, 2,320 are sheltered and 7,708 are unsheltered. Individuals with the highest rates of being without shelter are the chronically homeless, homeless veterans, and unaccompanied youth. It is estimated that 28.71% (2,838) of the 10,028 homeless people are chronically homeless with 67% of those chronically homeless being unsheltered. 660 are veterans (6.58%) with 79% of those being unsheltered. “Families” comprise 8.95% of total homeless population (276 families with 898 members). 1,155 (11.51%) of the homeless population are unaccompani ed youth and young adults; 91% of which are unsheltered
The City of Santa Clara saw an increase in its homeless population of 35% to 440 (up from 326).
Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including:
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs.
The City will continue its efforts of housing homeless families through its TBRA program. The goal is to house/keep housed approximately 20 households. The City will renew its agreement with the County of Santa Clara for FY24/25 to provide intensive case management to approximately 20 chronically homeless individuals referred by the police department. This program is funded with local funds. The County provides housing subsidies for the participants in this program while the City uses its Successor Housing Agency funds to provide the case management and services for the program. HOME-ARP funds will be used to provide street-based case manageme nt services and other supportive services to Qualifying Populations under the HOME-ARP regulations. The City will also continue to offer mobile shower/laundry and case management services on a weekly basis through a partnership with WeHope Dignity on Wheels..
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons.
TBD.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and prev enting individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again.
Particularly for chronically homeless, it is preferable for individuals to receive intensive case management rather than simple information and referral services. Case managers work to assist homeless individuals find housing, connect with resources, and receive services to maintain housing. The provision of case management is person -based rather than shelter -based with the goal of rapid re -housing. The goals of the County 2020-2025 Community Plan to End Homelessness establish a target of creating 6,000 housing opportunities for persons who are homeless. An additional goal is for each of the 6,000 new tenants to have access to the services that will allow them to maintain that housing.
The City will continue to use HOME funds for our TBRA program. The TBRA program is a short -term solution to homelessness (unlike permanent support ive housing for the chronically homeless). The 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 26
Homeless Survey has shown that families with children are not only a special need population but tend to be underrepresented in Homeless Surveys. The TBRA program will continue to focus on assisting the homeless and at-risk of homelessness population; however, preferences towards families with ch ildren, and individuals and/or families exiting housing exclusively designated for domestic violence survivors will be given.
Helping low -income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low - income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistanc e from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs.
Although the City does not fund programs or activities that specifically help low -income individuals and families avoid becoming homele ss who are being discharged from publicly funded institutions or who receive assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment or youth needs, many of the programs and activities that the City does fund help to prevent homelessness.
Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) . Many of the beneficiaries of the TBRA program also receive SNAP (i.e., food assistance), and all receive case management services. The program also allows for assistance to those that are housed, but on the verge of homelessness.
Homeless Prevention Program and Intensive Case Management. The City uses local funds to match county funds for a program that houses up to twenty (20) homeless individuals that are identified by the polic e department as high users of community resources; some of which had been discharged from facilities and/or jails. This population is also provided case management services. The City also funds the Homelessness Prevention System which provides temporary financial assistance, legal support, and case management to families or individuals who are at risk of losing their housing.
Landlord/Tenant Mediation . This program can indirectly help households stay housed through the mediation of eviction related issues.
Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence. This program provides a safety net of housing and services to either help victims avoid homelessness or make their homeless situation shorter.
Youth needs. The City provides CDBG funding for family and individual counseling needs through the Bill Wilson Center which focuses on the needs of foster children. By administering these programs, it provides The Bill Wilson Center the unique resources to identify homeless families, foster youth in their own system, and households with children in the school system that may be in need of critical needs such as housing, health, employment, education, and other social services.
The City is currently working to complete a City-specific homeless needs assessment and strategic plan.
The results of this process will direct future funding for homeless activities and programs.
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 27
AP-75 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.220 (j)
Introduction
The jurisdictions within the County face barriers to affordable housing that are common throughout the Bay Area. High on the list is the lack of developable land, which increases the cost of available lands and increases housing development costs. Local op position is another common obstacle as many neighbors have strong reactions to infill and affordable housing developments. Opposition is often based on misconceptions, such as an anticipated increase in crime; erosion of property values; increase in parkin g and traffic congestion; and overwhelmed schools. However, to ensure a healthy economy, the region must focus on strategies and investment that provide housing for much of the workforce in the region – retail sales clerks, firefighters and police, teacher s and health service workers – whose incomes significantly limit their housing choices.
Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment.
The City has identified multiple constraints or barriers to the affordable housing and residential investment in its 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, including:
Land use controls that limit the density of housing production; Parking requirements increase the cost of housing;
Income and wages are not consistent with the rising cost of housing; A competitive rental and housing market; and/or
Diminishing public funds.
Generally, the City faces the same affordable housing barriers as the rest of the Bay Area, including:
High cost of development constrains development of affordable housing units in favor of higher end units; and Lack of developable land prevents housing development and increases the price of land; and Local opposition prevents affordable housing from being built in high-resource areas; and Insufficient subsidies and vouchers for deeply affordable units.
Additionally, the Assessment of Fair Housing identified the following contributing factors to fair housing issues, including affordable housing, through analysis of data and community engagement feedback:
Displacement of residents due to economic pressures
Land use and zoning laws
Source of income and private discrimination
Community opposition to affordable housing
Availability of affordable units in a range of sizes Availability, type, frequency, and reliability of public transportation Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs Lack of affordable, accessible housing in a range of unit sizes Lack of affordable housing for individuals who need supportive services Lack of assistance for housing accessibility modifications Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations Loss of affordable housing.
Location and type of affordable housing
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 28
The adopted 2023-2031 Housing Element includes the following actions to remove or ameliorate barriers:
Continue to invest in new 100% affordable housing developments, w ork with nonprofits to acquire and rehabilitate distressed multi-family housing and convert it to low income housing, update the City zoning ordinance to comply with state laws on reason able accommodations, the siting of emergency shelters, transitional and supportive housing. Reduce parking requirements for housing development near transit, work with religious institutions to identify possible sites for affordable housing development , encourage ADU development, analyze impact fees, promote construction of accessary units and low income housing such as shared housing and Single Room Occupancy units, continue to require developers of 10 or more units to provide Below Market Rate units, identifying new sources of affordable housing fund ing, and more.
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 29
AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220 (k)
Introduction
This section discusses efforts in addressing the underserved needs, expanding and preserving affordable housing, reducing lead-based paint hazards, and developing institutional structure for delivering housing and community development activities.
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs One of the major obstacles to meeting the needs of the underserved is the limited amount of funding available to fund public services. The City contributes general funds to fund the tenant/landlord mediation program and the United Way 211 information line.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The City funds Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley to administer a portion of its Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation program. The program addresses building/housing code deficiencies, abatement of hazardous conditions, repair/rehabilitation of deteriorated conditions, and accessibility for persons with disabilities, all to improve the habitability, use and occupancy of owner -occupied housing. Financial assistance is provided in the form of grants. The City also administers its Neighborhood Conservation Improvement Program (i.e., Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation Program). These projects are typically larger in scope than the projects performed by Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley. Financial assistance is provided in the form of loans with flexible terms and below market rates.
The City has a Below Market Purchase Program (BMP). This program requires developers to set aside 15% of newly constructed units for housing affordable to low and moderate income homebuyers. The City is in the process of updating the BMP program so that initial buyers will be required to sell to qualified low and moderate income buyers keeping these homes affordable for at least 30 years.
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The City undertakes HUD-funded projects in accordance with the Lead-Based Paint Regulations published in 2000. These regulations most commonly affect residential structures rehabilitated through NCIP. When identified, lead paint will be controlled or abated and disposed of properly to eliminate or reduce the hazard of environmental or human contamination. The City has adopted a written plan to implement the regulations in its NCIP Program and other housing rehabilitation activities.
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families *Section update in progress
On August 22, 2017, the Santa Clara City Council approved a plan establishing the local minimum wage.
As of January 1, 2020, the City of Santa Clara minimum wage is adjusted annually based on the regional Consumer Price Index (CPI). The minimum wage as of January 1, 2024, is $17.75 per hour.
On April 4, 2017, the Santa Clara City Council unanimously passed the first Worker Retention Ordinance in Silicon Valley. The ordinance, that took effect on May 4, 2017, provides much-needed job security to some of the most vulnerable workers. This law protects food and building service workers from mass layoffs when companies switch contractors. It requires that if a company with an office or venue in Santa Clara hires a new contractor or b rings services in-house, the workers who currently work at that location must be kept on for a 90-day transition period.
The Santa Clara Unified School District (SCUSD) Adult Education Center has a CalWORKs Site Representative who acts as a liaison for pa rticipating CalWORKs students and Santa Clara County Social 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 30
Services Agency. Some of these responsibilities include ensuring that all participants on campus are remaining in compliance with federal regulations, developing a welfare to work plan, reporting monthly attendance to the County for each participant, and reporting progress reports on a quarterly basis for each participant CalWORKs student to the County. In addition to the Site Representative, the Adult Education Center has a Career Advisor for CalWORKs students to help them in job placement, resume development, and interviewing skills.
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
The City will continue its participation in the countywide CDBG Coordinators Committee, which increasingly has become a forum for discussion and active planning of common strategies to address the housing and community needs in Santa Clara County. The City also participates in the Community Planning Collaborative which focuses on housing policy from a development a nd land use perspective. Lastly, the City works closely with Cloudburst, a HUD approved TA provider. 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 31
Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies
The City will continue its efforts to encourage consortium-building among housing developers, public service providers, and governmental and non-governmental entities. The City has achieved proven results in using federal funds to leverage private funds. The City participates in the quarterly meetings of the Supportive Housing Roundtable, which includes government agencies, housing developers, service providers, legal services and private funders.
Discussion
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 32
AP-90 Program Specific Requirements – 91.220 (l) (1,2,4) Introduction
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l) (1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the strategic plan. 0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements. 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. 0 5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0 Total Program Income 0
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities. 0
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan.
100.00%
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 33
HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l) (2) *Section update in progress
A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 is as follows:
1. The City does not use HOME funds beyond those identified in Section 92.205. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254, is as follows:
Homeowner Equity – for purposes of this policy, it is defined as the sum of the down-payment, principal paid, and homeowner improvements.
HOME Equity – for purposes of this policy, it is defined as the amount of HOME investment, adjusted as follows: (1) The HOME investment amount would be reduced if, at the time of the homeowner purchase, the market price is less than the cost of construction, by the amount of that difference; and (2) Beginning after six years of residency by the original buyer, the City would reduce its share of excess proceeds by a maximum of 10% for each additional full year the original buyer resides in the home.
After the completion of 15 years of residency by the original buyer, the City would have no interest in recapturing any portion of its original HOME investment.
In the event of a sale of a HOME -assisted house during the 15-year HOME affordability period, sales proceeds would be distributed in the following order of priority:
a. Closing costs.
b. Primary mortgage loan (City or private lender).
c. Other loans superior to the HOME investment lien (if any have been approved by the City).
The remaining funds are considered Shared Net Proceeds under the HOME regulations and would be distributed in the following order of priority:
d. Homeowner Equity, or the amount of Shared Net Proceeds, whichever is less. e. Homeowner Shared Net Proceeds. This amount will be the greater of: (1) Homeowner Equity that was paid as described above; or (2) proportionately of the Shared Net Proceeds, according to the formula - Homeowner Equity, divided by the sum of Homeowner Equity plus HOME Equity. f. HOME investment. The remainder of the Shared Net Proceeds. If the remaining Shared Net Proceeds are insufficient to repay the full amount of the HOME investment, the City would forgive any of the HOME investment that could not be repaid from the remaining Shared Net Proceeds.
2. A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds. See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4) are as follows:
The City secures its HOME funds by recording Deeds of Trust on the title of the property that received the funding. The period of affordability would be a minimum of 15 years.
3. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b), are as follows:
2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 34
The City does not have any plans to use HOME funds to refinance existing debt on multi-family.
4. HOME funds may be allocated to affordable housing capital projects in contiguous jurisdictions.
Discussion
The following guidelines will apply to the TBRA program:
The program will serve homeless or at -risk of becoming homeless households, with preference given to families with children. The household income must be at, or below 60% AMI as published by HUD.
Households must reside in or have proof of a last permanent address in the City of Santa Clara, or who are currently working or have a bonafide job offer in the City of Santa Clara, or be homeless in the City of Santa Clara, or have children attending a school in the Santa Clara Unified School District.
Participants go through the Coordinated Assessment system and be placed in the Community Queue (a separate, confidential process is available within the system for domestic violence survivors). A Vulnerability Index -Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool 2.0 (VI -SPDAT) will assess the vulnerability and placement of the participant in the Queue. Further, the program -specific filters (e.g., families with children) will result in referrals to the TBRA program from the Queue.
While it would be ideal for participants to locate housing within the City limits, the program will allow participants to find housing located anywhere within the County of Santa Clara.
95% After Rehab Valuation
The City of Santa Clara may use HOME funds for acquisition purposes. Per CFR 24 92.254 (a)(iii), the City has chosen to determine separate limits for existing housing than the given median purchase price issued by HUD. City staff researched the Multiple Listings Service (MLS) to determine the number of single-family and multi-family home sales. There were less than 250 sales per months; thus, per 24.92.254 (a)(iii), we were required to compile 3 months of sales figures. The following details the home sales in Sant a Clara over the most recent three (3) months for single -family homes and multi -family homes at the time of publication. The numbers below are subject to change prior to submission of the AAP to HUD. 2025-2026 City of Santa Clara Annual Action Plan 35
/”:;
FY25-26
Estimated
Entitlement
Prior
Year
Balance
Estimated PI
CDBG FY25-26
HOME FY24-25
FY25-26
Total
Expected
$930,000 $0 $120,000 $1,050,000
$335,000 $320,000 $10,000 $665,000
$1,715,000
Estimate
Prog. Income
% Admin
Allowable
Staff
Recomm.
CDBG Administration (from allocation) max 20% $186,000
CDBG Administration (from est. FY25/26 PI) $120,000 max 20% $24,000 $210,000
HOME Administration (from allocation) max 10% $33,500
HOME Administration - 10% of 2024/2025 estimated PI of... $100,000 max 10% $10,000 $43,500
Est. Funds
Available
max 15% $139,500
$270,055 max 15% $40,508
max 15% $180,008
# Agencies Funded
562
CDBG
Funds
562
HOME
Funds
1 $ 30,000
2 $ 30,000
3 $ 30,000
4 $ 30,000
5 $ 30,000
6 $ 30,000
7 $ 60,000
8 $ 400,000
9 $ 200,000
10 $ 571,250
11 $ 50,250
12 $ 210,000
13 HOME Administration - Fair Housing Services $ 22,197 14 $ 21,303
# Budget
Summary
TOTAL
FUNDING
CDBG
funds
HOME
funds
A Public Service Activities $180,000 $ 180,000 $ - B Capital Improvement Projects $660,000 $ 660,000 $ - C Affordable Housing Activities $621,500 $ - $ 621,500 D Program Administration $253,500 $ 210,000 $ 43,500 FY 25-26 TOTAL ALLOCATION $1,715,000 $ 1,050,000 $ 665,000 Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME)
Program
Administration
CITY OF SANTA CLARA
FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 ALLOCATIONS - HUD FUNDS
Annual Action Plan Funding Breakdown (ver. 1)
TOTAL EXPECTED
RESOURCES
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center - Housing Assistance for person with disabilities
Public Service
Activities
Captial
Improv.
Proj.
Aff.
Hsg.
Act.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF EXPECTED RESOURCES AVAILABLE
CDBG Funds Available for Program Administration (20%)
Bill Wilson - Counseling & Family Therapy
Heart of the Valley - Support & Transportation Services Hope Services - Educational Services
Loaves & Fishes - Meals on Wheels
Senior Adult Legal Assistance (SALA) - Legal Assistance HOME Funds Available for Program Administration (10%)
CDBG Funds Available for
Public Services (i.e., Public Service CAP)
FY25/26 CDBG Entitlement Funds
FY24/25 Prior Year Program Income
CDBG Funds Available for Public Services (Publice Service CAP) NCIP Activity Delivery Costs
NCIP Loans and Grants
Minor Repair Program
TBRA Administration
Community Housing Development Org. (CHDO) Set-aside
ADMIN.
CDBG Administration
HOME Administration - City Administration
I I
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT
Action to (1) Approve an Expanded Scope of Work for the International Swim Center (ISC) Project, Including the Rehabilitation of the Pool and Dive Tower Facilities at the Current Location (“Project”), (2) Adopt a Resolution Declaring an Urgency in Accordance with City Charter Section 1310, Contracts on Public Works, to Allow for the Award of a Contract for the Project without Readvertising for Bids, and (3) Award the Contract for the Project to Adams Pool Solutions (4) Delegate Authority to the City Manager to Execute Agreements to Implement the Project, and (5) Approve Related Budget Amendments
COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Sports, Recreation & Arts Assets
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency
BACKGROUND
The George F. Haines International Swim Center (ISC) was designed in 1965, constructed in 1966, and opened to the public on July 1, 1967. The ISC is located at 2625 Patricia Drive within Central Park and features three pools (a 50-meter x 25-yard racing pool, a deep diving well, and a training pool), decks, mechanical circulation, filtration and heating systems, 3,000-seat viewing stands, roof, diving tower, changing/shower facilities, staff offices, training rooms, and several support spaces. As the facility has aged, a number of actions have been considered to study, improve, expand, and/or replace the ISC (Attachment 1).
In 2017, the City conducted a Facilities Condition Assessment (Kitchell) of all Parks & Recreation Department facilities, including the ISC. This visual assessment determined that the majority of the ISC was in poor to critical condition, with many components being deemed beyond their useful life.
The report recommended engaging a construction professional to further investigate noted concerns, including water damage and plumbing issues (
<https://www.santaclaraca.gov/our-city/departments-g-z/parks-recreation/park-projects> ).
On August 10, 2023, the City entered into an agreement with LPA, Inc. (Attachment 2) to conduct an initial assessment of the facility. The intent of the assessment was to identify systemic deficiencies, determine remaining operational life, assess risks and compliance with building codes, and provide an itemized cost estimate for rehabilitating the facility at its current location versus relocating it within Central Park or another location elsewhere in the City. This evaluation included architectural, structural, mechanical, Building Code, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance, forensic engineering, and investigative expertise. The agreement with LPA, Inc. has since had two Council- approved amendments.
Due to health and safety concerns identified in the assessment produced by LPA, Inc., the ISC was City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 1 of 9
powered by Legistar™
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
closed indefinitely in January 2024 (Attachment 4). Areas of concern included the administrative building, diving tower and viewing windows, pools (e.g., drain, steps, ladders, stairs, deck, etc.), viewing stands, and perimeter fencing and gates.
During the ISC closure, the City’s Parks and Recreation Department has remained committed to providing lap swim to the community through programming at alternate locations. Additionally, Santa Clara Swim Club and Santa Clara Artistic Swimming were granted use of alternate pools for their program needs at no charge. Unfortunately, the City does not have an alternate deep pool and diving structure suitable for the Santa Clara Dive Club.
On June 25, 2024 (Report to Council 24-120), City Council approved one-time funding for up to $1.86 million to remediate deficiencies and provide use of the training and racing pools with a limited capacity of up to 200 persons. Repairs to the diving tower, diving well, administrative building, and locker rooms were not included in this allocation. This project scope, combined with the capacity restriction, would reduce the overall program delivery at the facility.
DISCUSSION
Facility Remediation Efforts
On July 31, 2024, the City issued a Request for Bids seeking qualified contractors to provide replastering services. On October 22, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to Adams Pool Solutions (Attachment 5) to provide the following services:
· Perform minor repairs to the main drain
· Replace missing/broken tiles (added to scope of work in January 2025) · Reset ladders into the pool deck
· Reset interior pool steps to be ADA compliant
· Replaster the racing and training pools
Additionally, the City issued a Request for Bids to address repairs and replacement of the facility’s gate, fencing, and windscreens to comply with Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health standards governing public aquatic facilities. In December 2024, the City executed an agreement with Tucker Construction for the fencing component of this project.
Improvement Permits and Project Planning
The County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health issued the required improvement permit on December 19, 2024. The racing and training pools were drained on January 6, 2025, and construction began on January 13, 2025, with work scheduled through March 2025. However, the timeline did not include time to refill the pools with water, conduct chemical balancing, bring the water to a usable temperature, or secure final permits from the County or City Building Official.
Discovery of Structural Issues
During the week of January 27, 2025 (Week 3 of the project), Adams Pool Solutions convened an emergency onsite meeting to disclose unforeseen damage to the pool’s gutter and apron infrastructure. Staff invited City Councilmembers (with Councilmembers Chahal and Park attending) and aquatic user groups to attend a meeting held on January 29, 2025. During the meeting, the contractor explained the newly discovered issues, along with potential options, estimated costs, and City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 2 of 9
powered by Legistar™
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
anticipated impacts to the project timeline.
In early February, the project was paused due to rain, allowing staff to further evaluate structural concerns and consider expanding the project scope to include pool boiler/heater and plumbing issues. These discussions led to a memo distributed to the City Council on February 13, 2025 (Attachment 6) and individual Councilmember participated in site visits with staff (Councilmembers Hardy and Cox).
As described in Attachment 6 and summarized below, two options were identified to move forward with the ISC project. The current project scope is referred to as Option A, while the expanded project scope is referred to as Option B:
Option A - Continue with the replastering of the training and racing pools, including the added remedy work to the gutter and apron. In this scenario, barring the discovery of further critical damage, the facility would reopen in late Spring 2025 with a maximum capacity of 200 people to train or swim recreationally. This scenario has $1.86 million in the budget and does not provide any remediation to the diving well and tower, infrastructure, pool deck, plumbing, boiler systems, administration building, or locker rooms. This scenario is a short-term fix (3-5 years), which will need to be worked around where possible when a long-term solution is funded and implemented.
Option B - In Phase 1, expand the scope of work to replace the pool decking, recirculation, plumbing, boilers, and perimeter gutter systems for all pools, including the dive well. Option B would also include either the replacement or refurbishment of the dive tower. This option would reconfigure the racing pool depth, lighting, temperature and equipment to adhere to County of Santa Clara requirements, create operational efficiencies and redundancies, while meeting current the competition standards across multiple disciplines. These improvements are expected to extend the life of the facility a minimum of 25-30 years. In an effort to streamline this project and save time, staff is exploring the concept of delivering the project in an unconventional manner that includes accelerated design, and minimal City design reviews.
This would help minimize the pool shutdown time but in doing so the City will assume more risk related to unforeseen issues and change orders than a project that goes through the conventional design process. It is too early to lay out exact schedules, but staff is working with the consultant, LPA, Inc, and based on preliminary discussions are looking at the potential of completing the project in less than 2 years.
Additional construction costs for Option B Phase 1 were roughly estimated at $4 million to $5 million over the current budget. After the original estimate shared with City Council, the aquatics user groups requested that the racing pool depth be increased to meet international racing standards of 3 meters. This was twice the additional depth that could be achieved through simply updating the gutters to rim flow, which would have added 12-14 inches. The current depth of the pool (with existing gutter system) is 6 ½ feet. Additionally, the estimate for replacing the dive tower was modified by LPA as early work began on schematic design to approximately $2 million to replace the tower in kind.
Although the originally shared estimate was $4 to $5 million, after discussions with the aquatics user groups and LPA, as well as adding 25% contingency to allow for additional unforeseen circumstances, a recommendation to increase the contract authority to a not-to- City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 3 of 9
powered by Legistar™
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
exceed amount of $10 million is recommended for Phase 1 of the project. This will allow staff to efficiently navigate the project in a timely manner and provide adequate contingency funds to address unknowns with the project costing and scope (such as the replacement or refurbishment of the dive tower). Staff will continue providing updates to the aquatics user groups and City Council as the project progresses.
At an additional expense, Option B Phase 2 of the ISC Project can run concurrently and will include demolition, design, and construction of new administration, restrooms/locker rooms, and equipment storage facility. If Option B is chosen, a cost estimate will need to be developed for this phase of the work.
Subject to obtaining further Council approval, all of the above-described work could ultimately be funded using proceeds from the Measure I voter-approved infrastructure bond.
If Council proceeds with Option A, the replastering project would be one of multiple phases taking years to complete, while causing multiple/extended service disruptions for the City and aquatic user group programming. If Option B is selected, this project can be completed in two phases, with full access to the water for all user groups, including the City, as outlined above.
Summary of Costs to Date
On June 25, 2024, City Council approved $1.86 million in one-time funding for the Planning and Construction of Temporary and/or Permanent ISC Replacement Facility project in the Parks & Recreation Capital Fund. The expenses outlined below would have been incurred to deliver Option A, and can be applied to the overall strategy to achieve Option B. To date, the following expenses have been incurred:
Vendor / Supplier Total Expense Encumbered Amount
Adams Pool Solutions $186,590 $233,482
Knorr Systems (pool
sweep/robot)
$8,246 $8,246
Tucker Construction $69,721 $128,019
Lincoln Aquatics (ADA Lift) $8,886
LPA, Inc. $400,000
TOTAL $264,557 $778,633
Aquatic User Groups: Communications and Impacts
Staff met with the Aquatic User Groups on three occasions (December 17, 2024, January 31, 2025, and February 26, 2025) to discuss the status of the Measure I Bond, Community Oversight Committee and Community Aquatics Facility Steering Committee, temporary re-opening of the ISC, interim facility needs, and various updates throughout the replastering project. During the February 26th meeting, staff discussed Option A and Option B, as outlined above, with all the Aquatic User Groups.
The Aquatic User Groups expressed unified support for Option B. Given the extreme adverse impacts the delays in re-opening the facility is having on the viability of their programs, and the kids in those programs, they also expressed support for the using the existing architect and contractor City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 4 of 9
powered by Legistar™
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
working on the facility in order to efficiently expedite the process.
Since January 2024, there have been several material adverse impacts on local non-profit aquatics user groups, including:
· Lack of consistent space has caused on-going disruptions to programming schedules · Alternate locations do not match what is offered at the ISC (e.g., bodies of water/depth, platform volume and heights, ability to offer daily programming, exhibitions, meets, shows, camps, swim lessons, etc.)
· Increased travel time to and from alternate sites causes challenges for families (e.g., homework, dinner, other commitments, etc.)
· Inability to safely store equipment at rental locations · Staff offices are not available at alternate sites
· Movement of equipment from site to site causes increased wear and tear and reduced replacement schedule
· Financial strain on organizations due to increased pool rental costs · Increase in membership dues
· Sense of team, camaraderie and corresponding pride impacted due to separate schedules and/or locations
· There is a unique legacy of each club providing athletes to collegiate programs, world class athletes to National, International and Olympic Teams as well as professional shows. This notoriety ties back to the City of Santa Clara and the International Swim Center · Some alternate locations do not have the same security features the clubs are accustomed to at the ISC (e.g., staff monitor at door, gated facility locked, etc.) · Uncertainty on the long-term viability of the aquatics user groups based overextended operation restrictions
In addition to the impacts experienced by local non-profit aquatics user groups, the City has experienced a dramatic impact in its ability to deliver core health and wellness recreation aquatic programs, such as lap swimming and drop-in swimming for our residents. In 2022, the last year of uninterrupted ISC operation, the City served over 20,000 participants for these services. Since the 2024 closure, the City has served less than 1,000 participants for the same services. Due to the impacts outlined above, Option B is receiving clear and collective support from the aquatics user groups and City staff.
Declaration of Urgency: Waiver of Formal Public Works Bidding The Santa Clara City Charter Section 1310 generally requires that public works contracts involving an expenditure of more than $1,000 be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.
The City Charter also authorizes the City Council to award a public works contract without advertising for bids if the City Council deems the work to be of urgent necessity for the preservation of life, health or property. The determination of urgency requires at least four (4) affirmative votes and a declaration of facts constituting such urgency.
As outlined above, there are several programmatic, financial, and social impacts on the City and local non-profit Aquatics User Groups resulting from the ISC’s closure that weigh in favor of waiving formal public works bidding procedures. First, based on communications with the aquatic user groups, a significant delay to conduct public bidding will cause substantial adverse impacts on the individual City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 5 of 9
powered by Legistar™
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
parents and youth participants in the Aquatics User Group activities, and will also threaten the financial viability of those user groups. In addition, based on information from the City’s Parks & Recreation Department, any and all delays in general community access to ISC programs has had, and will continue to have, material adverse impacts on public health and well-being as youth, adults and seniors alike within Santa Clara and the region will continue to be denied full access to aquatics programs and health benefits at that facility.
If the City Council approves adoption of an urgency declaration, staff recommends awarding the contract for expanded scope to Adams Pool Solutions. The original contract with Adams Pool Solutions was procured through a competitive bidding process for non-public works projects pursuant to Santa Clara City Code Section 2.105.140(d). In addition, over the past 19 months, the City has procured the services of Adams Pool Solutions through three separate competitive bid processes for work at Mary Gomez Swim Center (August 2023), the Senior Center Natatorium (December 2024), and the ISC (August 2024).
Unlike the original scope (Option A), the expanded scope presented to Council as Option B is considered a public works project under City Charter Section 1310. Given the expanded project scope and the urgent need to reopen the ISC for City programs and local non-profit aquatics user groups, staff is recommending City Council consider proceeding with Adams Pool Solutions under the urgency exception for public works bidding. This would enable the continuation of work by Adams Pool Solutions already engaged for the original scope.
Additionally, on March 11, 2025, the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the agreement with LPA, Inc., allowing staff to utilize the existing architectural firm selected through a competitive procurement process (Agreement in negotiation and not yet finalized for attachment).
Next Steps
LPA, Inc. is working on the schematic design and construction cost estimate phase. Once schematic design is complete, LPA estimates the engineering design work could take approximately 2 - 4 months if everything goes smoothly. At that time, the documents will (based on the stated goals) simultaneously go through City and County aquatic facility plan review and permit processes to ensure all facilities meet minimum health and safety standards while ensuring the functionality, flow, and ease of use for consumers and operators alike. These timelines are dependent upon receiving a County permit in a timely manner. The Consultant and County will coordinate site inspections as part of the plan check process to verify compliance with the engineering plans.
As noted above, the Council may proceed by adopting an urgency declaration and award a contract to the current contractor (Adams Pool Solutions). If an urgency declaration is adopted, the standard Request for Bids process would not be necessary. Without invoking a public works bid exemption as detailed above, staff will be required to follow the standard public works bidding process which will add several months to the overall project timeline.
The average timeline to complete a basic public works project is approximately 34 months. This includes scope development, consultant procurement, bid, and construction. Through discussions with LPA it is estimated there may be an opportunity to shorten this timeline approximately 12 months through utilizing existing design and construction firms, accelerating the design process and minimizing plan reviews. There are many variables to this schedule which include the age of the infrastructure, unforeseen conditions, outside agency coordination, weather, and the current City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 6 of 9
powered by Legistar™
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
economic supply-chain landscape. Because of these factors, the City, consultant, contractor and aquatics user groups need to be prepared for changes, and stay in constant communication around the overall project timeline.
Staff would return to Council in late-summer 2025 with an additional recommendation related to the bleacher canopy as well as the administration building which may include multiple amenities, such as restrooms, shower facilities, locker room, storage, office space and/or a community meeting room (Phase 2).
Bond Measure / Replacement
In November 2024, Santa Clara voters approved Measure I that authorized the issuance of up to $400 million of General Obligation bonds to support the City’s infrastructure. Of the $400 million in General Obligation bonds, an estimated $115 million is earmarked for Parks, Libraries, Senior Center and Aquatics Facilities, with $45 million specifically designated for Community Aquatic Facility/ISC Renovation/Replacement.
The staff recommendation creates an opportunity to utilize the $45 million in aquatics-related general obligation bond funds to:
· Restore the three swimming pools with new plumbing, mechanical and gutter systems in the existing ISC footprint, including addressing the dive tower, repairing the grandstands and canopy, and new administration building at the ISC
· Rehabilitate Warburton Swim Center with additional community amenities · Conduct repairs at Mary Gomez Swim Center
· Enhance the Senior Center Natatorium
A Community Aquatics Facility Steering Committee will be convened to provide input relative to the bond funds available to meet the aquatics needs of the community. The Committee may provide input on matters such as:
· Current and future community aquatic program needs and partnerships · Conceptual and facility design needs and locations
· Business model reducing the net operational cost of aquatic facilities, while planning for long- term infrastructure maintenance and replacement
Although the decision to use bond funds for the expanded scope of work for the ISC Project is not before the Council with this item, this is an item staff would intend to bring back to the Council later this year for Council consideration and action.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered is exempt for the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 “Existing Facilities” as the activity consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities mechanical equipment or topographical features involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agencies determination.
FISCAL IMPACT
Option A costs are estimated at $1.86 million and cover short-term improvements; the budget includes funding for these costs. Option B - Phase 1 costs are estimated to total up to $10 million and City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 7 of 9
powered by Legistar™
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
cover long-term improvements. Option B - Phase 2 costs are yet to be determined; these costs will be brought forward at a later date.
The Planning and Construction of Temporary and/or Permanent ISC Replacement Facility project has a total budget of $1.86 million in the Parks & Recreation Capital Fund. Of this amount, $1.36 million is allocated for FY 2024/25, and $0.5 million is allocated for FY 2025/26. Staff is recommending additional funding of $8.14 million to bring the budget to $10 million to cover the Option B - Phase 1 costs. General Obligation Bond funds will ultimately be used to cover this additional cost. On an interim basis, staff is recommending the use of the General Fund Land Sale Reserve to bridge the funding gap. The Land Sale Reserve funds would be reimbursed once the General Obligation bonds are issued, expected in FY 2025/26. General Obligation bond funding would also be used to fund Option B - Phase 2.
The table below describes the recommended budget amendments to bring the project budget to $10 million. This includes the temporary use of the General Fund Land Sale Reserve of $8.14 million. In addition, $500,000 set aside for the project in FY 2025/26 is recommended to be shifted to FY 2024/25. The funding is currently set aside in the General Fund Reserve for Programmed Capital Projects. Any funds not expended or encumbered in FY 2024/25 will be carried over to FY 2025/26.
Budget Amendment
FY 2024/25
Current Increase/
(Decrease)
Revised
Parks and Recreation Capital Fund
Expenditures
Planning and Construction of Temporary and/or Permanent ISC Replacement Facility (project 3196)$1,362,069 $8,637,931 $10,000,000 Revenues
Transfer from the General Fund - Land Sale Reserve$0 $8,137,931 $8,137,931 Transfer from the General Fund - Reserve for Programmed Capital Projects$0 $500,000 $500,000 General Fund
Transfer to the Parks and Recreation Capital Fund - Land Sale Reserve$0 $8,137,931 $8,137,931 Land Sale Reserve $18,481,000 ($8,137,931) $10,343,069
Transfer to the Parks and Recreation Capital Fund - Reserve for Programmed Capital Projects$0 $500,000 $500,000 Reserve for Programmed Capital Projects ($500K for project 3196)$6,107,871 ($500,000) $5,607,871 Staff intends to return to Council in the future for additional fund appropriation, for Phase 2 (e.g., bleacher repair, bleacher canopy and administration building).
COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the Finance Department, City Attorney’s Office and City Manager’s Office.
PUBLIC CONTACT
City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 8 of 9
powered by Legistar™
25-140 Agenda Date: 4/8/2025
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] or at the public information desk at any City of Santa Clara public library.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Determine that the proposed action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of Title 14 of California Code of Regulations;
2. Approve an Expanded Scope of Work (Option B - Phase 1) with the International Swim Center (ISC) Project, Including the Rehabilitation of the Facility at the Current Location;
3. Adopt a resolution declaring an urgency in accordance with City Charter Section 1310 (Attachment 7) to allow for the award of the Contract for the Expanded Scope without a readvertisement for bids;
4. Award the Public Works Contract for the expanded scope to Adams Pool Solutions on the terms presented and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute all necessary documents associated with and necessary for the award, completion, and acceptance of this Project, in final forms approved by the City Attorney, with a not-to-exceed amount of $10 million, subject to appropriation of funds, and in forms approved by the City Attorney, to accomplish the expanded scope of work for the three swimming pools and their associated operational needs, and Authorize the City Manager to execute all change orders for the Project.
5. Approve the following FY 2024/25 budget amendments:
a. In the Parks and Recreation Capital Fund, recognize transfers of $8,137,931 from the General Fund Land Sale Reserve and $500,000 from the General Fund Reserve for Programmed Capital Projects and increase the Planning and Construction of Temporary and/or Permanent ISC Replacement Facility project by $8,637,931; and,
b. In the General Fund, establish transfers to the Parks and Recreation Capital Fund of $8,137,931 from the Land Sale Reserve and $500,000 from the Reserve for Programmed Capital Projects and decrease the Land Sale Reserve by $8,137,931 and the Reserve for Programmed Capital Projects by $500,000.
Prepared by: Carolyn McDowell, Senior Management Analyst Approved by: Damon Sparacino, Parks & Recreation Department Director Approved by: Jōvan Grogan, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS
1. ISC Timeline
2. LPA, Inc. Agreement
3. Amendment No. 1 to LPA, Inc. Agreement
4. LPA Visual Observations Assessment Report
5. Adams Pool Solution Agreement
6. ISC Project Update Memo to City Council
7. Declaration of Urgency Resolution
City of Santa Clara Printed on 4/4/2025Page 9 of 9
powered by Legistar™
Attachment 1
George F. Haines International Swim Center (ISC) – Timeline
1965
ISC architectural designed by L.F. Richards, landscape by Royston, Hanamoto, Mayes & Beck.
1966
ISC constructed by general contractors R. L. Carroll (building) and Max D.
Schenk (pools & site work) at a cost of $725,000.
1967
July 1, 1967, ISC opened; July 2-7, 1967, first international trials competition. September 10, 1967, ISC official dedication held.
1999
FY1999/2000, Council appropriation of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) funds in the amount of $100,000 for the Master Plan for International Swim Center Expansion Project to construct one additional 50-meter competitive swimming pool to accommodate additional community swimming, synchronized swimming, diving practice and competition.
FY 2000/2001, Council appropriation of additional CIP funds in the amount of $1,700,000 to complete Swim Center Master Plan and develop construction drawings.
July 1, 1999 to January 15, 2002, Cannon Design (architects) completed Master Plan for ISC Expansion Project.
2001-2002
FY2001/2002, Council appropriation of $5,500,000 to complete construction, raising total project funding to $7,300,000. Design included using a portion of Fatjo Field to the north of the existing ISC.
January 15, 2002, Parks & Recreation Commission (PRC) recommends limit of expansion to the existing ISC acreage.
2002-2005
FY2002/2003, Council suspended ISC Expansion Project due to economic downturn and shortage of Capital Project Reserve (CPR) funds. FY2004/2005, ISC Expansion Project funding reduced by $4,635,000 and funds returned to CPR for other CIP projects.
February 22, 2005, Council directed CM to transfer remaining funds to the Senior Center Expansion Project.
2007
June 5, 2007, Council approved FY2007/2008 Annual Budget including allocation of $450,000 for Plans and Design guidelines for International Swim Center Expansion Project.
Attachment 1
December 7, 2007, Council approved recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Commission to approve the proposed ISC Master Plan, proceed with detailed Cost estimate for ISC Pools Replacement Project.
2008
May 13, 2008, Council reviewed cost estimate: New Pools $33.5M, Swim Building $18.5M, Combined Pools & Building $49.7M, Training Center Building $6.2M (Total: $55.9M).
June 10, 2008, Council adopted FY2008/09 CIP including additional funding of $950,000 for ISC Pool Replacement Project which included two 50-meter lap pools, diving well with platforms, recreational pool, mechanical & restroom facilities, and remodel of existing building and grandstands. August 19, 2008, Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed proposal by International Swim Hall of Fame (ISHOF) Executive Director to bring ISHOF to Santa Clara.
September 16, 2008, Parks & Recreation Commission recommended Council suspend approved ISC Pool Replacement Project in favor of a clean slate vision of a world class facility inclusive of ISHOF.
September 30, 2008, Council referred the PRC recommendation to the City Manager.
2009-2012
Referral placed on “hold” due to fiscal constraints of Great Recession, with no further funds allocated or actions taken.
2013
January 2013, Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed schematic design by ELS Architecture and Urban Design and an advocacy group Silicon Valley Aquatics Initiative (SVAI) proposing 100% private funded design and construction.
February 2013, Parks & Recreation Commission recommended that Council refer the idea to Council Goal Setting Process in March 2013. February 26, 2013, (Item 7.A.) Council
September 2013, Council adopted a two-year goal to "Enhance Community Sports and Recreational Assets" including a specific objective to complete a feasibility study of the ISC.
2014
July 3, 2014, Aquatic Program & Financial Feasibility Analysis prepared by The Sports Management Group (TSMG) feasibility study, public opinion research and conceptual design.
June 2014. Council set an objective to develop the schematic design, gather community input and complete engineering documents, as well as include the International Swimming Hall of Fame (ISHOF) and the Community Recreation Center (CRC) into a new proposed facility.
Attachment 1
November 2014. ELS Architecture & Urban Design (ELS) was awarded a contract for architectural design, engineering, community outreach, and facility program planning and operational financial analysis.
December 2014, David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. was selected to work with ELS to prepare the environmental Initial Study, and in July 2015 additional environmental work, including Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, traffic and parking studies.
2015
Spring 2015, community workshops were hosted at the Community Recreation Center. Sandis, Inc. completed site survey work, Murray Engineering, Inc. completed geotechnical work.
August 2015, based on additional information and input, ELS was tasked with adjustments to improve the schematic design and its placement in the Central Park.
2016
February 23, 2016, (HIST-50498) Council Review of the Proposed Final Schematic Design of the International Swim Center, Community Recreation Center, and International Swimming Hall of Fame Project. September 20, 2016, (HIST-53942) Council Adoption of a Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program (MMRP); approving the filing of a Notice of Determination; approving architectural design with conditions allowing development of a new International Swim Center & Community Recreation Center inclusive of the International Swimming Hall of Fame and associated parking in Central Park at 909 Kiely Boulevard; and provide the City Manager with additional direction on parking and project phasing as needed (CEQ2015-01189 (IS/MND)/PLN2015- 10939 (Architectural Review).
October 25, 2016, (HIST-55338) Council presentation by the Plenary Group regarding Public Private Partnership (P3) approach for financing the International Swim Center and Community Recreation Center Project.
2017
April 4, 2017, (HIST-58831) Council approved an agreement with Project Finance Advisory, Limited (PFAL) in an amount not-to-exceed $649,735 to provide financial advisory, capital campaign, public opinion research, and project management services for Capital Improvement Project 3172 International Swim Center, Community Recreation Center, International Swimming Hall of Fame, and Parking, and approved an appropriation of $500,000 for the Project. April 4, 2017, (HIST-58836) Council approved agreement with Kitchell/CEM to provide Facility Condition Assessment and Capital Planning Services for Parks & Recreation Department facilities.
July 18, 2017, (HIST-60356) Council Study Session with PFAL regarding the International Swim Center, Community Recreation Center and ISHOF Project.
Case Studies of Comparable Facilities.
Attachment 1
October 2017, Gates & Associates contracted to complete a Central Park Master Plan to create a coherent vision of future Central Park improvements, provide a set of guiding principles, community supported priorities, and design criteria.
2018
February 20, 2018, (HIST-64059) Council Study Session with PFAL regarding Central Park Community Recreation and Aquatic Center regarding project affordability issues and public opinion research findings and direction on a right “sized project.”
April 24, 2018. Council Study Session. Infrastructure needs for the City (excluding SVP); (18-091) Council notes and files the Parks and Recreation Facilities Condition Assessment.
o The Parks & Recreation Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) report (Kitchell, 2018) identified parks and recreation assets that are in need of replacement and/or renewal to meet current building and accessibility codes and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission guidelines as well as address failing infrastructure.
May 29, 2018, (18-287) Item 3.D. Review of Infrastructure Improvement Needs and Funding Levels for Potential November 2018 Ballot Measure August 28, 2018, (18-033) Council Study Session reviewed Central Park Mater Plan Guiding Principles; and, (18-1184) Item 2.N. Council approved Central Park Guiding Principles.
August 28, 2018, (18-1184) Council approved Central Park Master Plan Guiding Principles (Gates & Associates)
2019
October 15, 2019, (19-1202) Parks & Recreation Commission initiates review and public comment period on the Central Park Master Plan Administrative Draft. On-line survey 1 had over 600 participants and final survey posted on “Open City Hall” from October 24, 2019, through November 12, 2019 which had 394 visitors (240 responses) with 12.0 hours of public comment. November 19, 2019 (19-1353) Parks & Recreation Commission recommended Council approval of the Central Park Master Plan and Draft Ordinance in accordance with City Charter 714.1. The Plan identifies 14 projects to be completed over a 20-year period in three phases. The Projects in years 1-5 include Arbor Center Area, Park Entry at Kiely/Kaiser, and Aquatic Center Master Plan & Design, followed in years 6-10 with Aquatic Center Master Plan (Phase 1) 50-Meter Multi-Use Pool Construction.
2020-2022
COVID 19 Pandemic and health emergency response.
Various ISC closures due to failing infrastructure and repairs.
2023
RTC 23-577 Action on Agreement with LPA, Inc. for Forensic Engineering Analysis for the ISC.
-
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1 F3O0202-9008-46E8-AACB-1 DA7DD9E0D2D EBIX Insurance No. S200003297
AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA,
AND
LPA, INC.
FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SWIM CENTER FACILITY ASSESSMENT
PREAMBLE
This Agreement is entered into as of the City's execution date (Effective Date) between the City of Santa Clara, California, a chartered California municipal corporation (City) and LPA, Inc., a California corporation (Contractor or Consultant). City and Contractor may be referred to individually as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties" or the "Parties to this Agreement."
RECITALS
A. City desires to secure the design professional services more fully described in this Agreement, at Exhibit A, entitled "Scope of Services"; B. "Design professional" includes licensed architects, licensed landscape architects, registered professional engineers and licensed professional land surveyors; C. Contractor represents that it, and its subcontractors, if any, have the professional qualifications, expertise, necessary licenses and desire to provide certain goods and/or required services of the quality and type which meet objectives and requirements of City; and,
D. The Parties have specified herein the terms and conditions under which such services will be provided and paid for.
The Parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS
The documents forming the entire Agreement between City and Contractor shall consist of these Terms and Conditions and the following Exhibits, which are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by this reference:
Exhibit A- Scope of Services
Exhibit B - Schedule of Fees
Design Professional Agreement with LPA, Inc.
Rev. 09-28-18