Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Santa Clarita City Council
June 25, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
June 25, 2024
Body
Santa Clarita City Council
Pages
14
Original file
20.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santaclaritacityca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Staff has not identified alternative actions that would conform to requirements set forth in the Subdivision Map Act.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENTS
Location Map
Fact Sheet
18 Packet Pg. 267

18.a
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: Location Map [Revision 1] (APPROVE MAP/ACCEPT/REJECT OFFER OF DEDICATION

FACT SHEET
TRACT MAP 51644-18

Location: Within the Tesoro community north of Tesoro del Valle Road.

Acreage: Approximately 68.47 acres

Number of Lots: One hundred ninety-five (195)

Use: One hundred fifty-nine (159) single family residential units, three (3) private park lots, twenty-one (21) open space lots, and various private streets and utility service lots.

Owner: BLC Tesoro LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; Western Alliance Bank, an Arizona Corporation; Lennar Homes of California, Inc., a California Corporation.

Trails/Paseos: No new trails are being dedicated to the City by this map.

B&T Fees: All applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) Fee(s) will be paid prior to the issuance of building permits, in accordance with the conditions of approval issued by the County of Los Angeles prior to annexation.

Transit Fees: The Transit Fee obligation was not required by the County of Los Angeles.

Quimby Fees: The Quimby obligation for the development has previously been satisfied with the dedication of 12 acres for a private park.

School Fees: All applicable School fee(s) will be paid prior to issuance of building permits.

18.b
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Fact Sheet (APPROVE MAP/ACCEPT/REJECT OFFER OF DEDICATION TR51644-18 (TESORO))

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 19

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: June 25, 2024
SUBJECT: DAVID MARCH PARK, PROJECT P4027 - PLANS,

SPECIFICATIONS, AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PRESENTER: Shannon Pickett

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the David March Park, Project P4027.

2. Find the David March Park Project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Addendum complies with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulation, Article 11, Sections 15162 and 15164, for changes to the original project.

3. Award the construction contract to Urban Habitat, in the amount of $9,172,460 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $917,246, for a total contract amount not to exceed $10,089,706.

4. Award the professional services contract to Converse Consultants, to provide materials inspection services, in the amount of $250,000 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $25,000, for a total contract amount not to exceed $275,000.

5. Extend the current contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for construction support services with Psomas, in the amount of $596,786 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $59,679, for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $656,465.

6. Appropriate one-time funds in the amount of $120,000 from the Park Dedication - Quimby Fund (Fund 305) to the David March Park, Project P4027, expenditure account P4027305- 516101 and $570,800 from the Facilities Fund (Fund 723) to the David March Park, Project, Project P4027, expenditure account P4027723-516101.

7. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents, subject to City Attorney approval.
19 Packet Pg. 270

Page 2 ends

BACKGROUND

This project will provide for an expansion and additional amenities to David March Park, originally built by The County of Los Angeles (County) in 2004. The park is located on a 13.2- acre lot on Via Joyce Drive, as shown on the attached Location Map, and was incorporated into the City of Santa Clarita (City) in June 2016. Phase I was completed by the County and included the build out of approximately two acres of the northern portion of the property including a playground, fitness zone, horseshoe pits, picnic tables, restroom building, and parking.

This project includes improvements identified in the David March Park Phase II Master Plan, which was originally developed by the County and updated by the City in March 2022 in order to meet City standards. The construction of this project will include improvements to the existing park as well as the development of an additional five acres of the park property. Shade canopies, one basketball court with sport court lighting, lighted walkways, and expanded parking will be added to the existing park. Improvements to the expanded lower-level area include a baseball field and backstop with shaded spectator stands and sport field lighting, an additional restroom building, an Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant walkway between activity levels, exercise stairs, security lighting along walkways, an additional parking lot, shaded community gathering areas, one trash enclosure, and landscape and irrigation improvements.

Pickleball courts were evaluated during the conceptual design phase for David March Park. The expansion area of the park will include one baseball field, but does not have adequate space to accommodate pickleball courts. However, four new permanent pickleball courts were recently added to Bouquet Canyon Park and four overlay courts were added to the tennis courts located at Skyline Ranch Park, which opened in March 2024. These new courts are located within two miles of David March Park. Additionally, staff continues to evaluate feasible park locations for pickleball courts, which includes future park projects.

Civic Art will also be incorporated into the project with a designated budget of $108,389. These funds will be used to design, construct, and install public artwork at David March Park in coordination with the Arts Commission and the Public Art Planning and Selection process.

This project exemplifies the City’s commitment to improving the quality of life of its residents and supports the Develop, Enhance, and Rehabilitate Park Features and Facilities theme identified in the Parks and Recreation 5-Year Plan. This project also supports the Building and Creating Community theme of the City’s five-year strategic plan, Santa Clarita 2025.

California Environmental Quality Act Requirements

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements were completed when the Plum Canyon Park (renamed to David March Park, May 28, 2002) combined Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were approved and adopted by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors at its regular meeting on July 16, 2002. A Notice of Completion was filed with the State Clearinghouse on October 15, 2002 (SCH #2001021050).

19 Packet Pg. 271

Page 3 ends

An Addendum to the IS/MND was prepared to evaluate the addition of six stadium lights, associated with the previously approved sports field, and a set of exercise stairs (Modified Project), which were not included in the original project. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Addendum are available in the City Clerk’s Reading File.

The Addendum concluded there is substantial evidence to determine that:

1. the Modified Project does not represent a substantial change from the previously approved project evaluated in the 2002 IS/MND;

2. no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Modified Project is undertaken; and

3. the Modified Project has not introduced new information of substantial importance that was not previously known.

The Modified Project would not have any new or substantially more severe impacts than what was evaluated in the 2002 IS/MND. No new mitigation measures are recommended in addition to those adopted at the time the 2002 IS/MND was approved that would further reduce Project impacts. The 2002 IS/MND, when considered in conjunction with this Addendum, provides adequate documentation, pursuant to CEQA for the Approved and Modified Projects, without further reporting or approval required.

Solicitation Process - Construction Contract

An invitation to bid was prepared and published twice in The Signal newspaper, on April 18 and 25, 2024, and was posted on the City’s website. A total of four bids were submitted to the City and opened by Purchasing on May 24, 2024. Each of the bids included a base bid and three bid alternates. The basis for award was the total for the base bid. The results of the total base bids are shown below:

Company Location Bid Amount
Urban Habitat La Quinta, CA $8,225,973
Staples Construction Company, Inc. Ventura, CA $10,195,540 RC Becker and Sons, Inc. Santa Clarita, CA $10,546,966 Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. Covina, CA $11,540,090

Staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Urban Habitat, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, in the amount of $10,089,706, which includes $8,225,973 for the base bid, $946,487 for bid alternates one and two, and authorizing a contingency in the amount of $917,246, for a total contract amount not to exceed $10,089,706. This contractor possesses a valid state contractor’s license and is in good standing with the Contractors State License Board.

Staff reviewed the bid response for accuracy and conformance to the contract documents and found it to be complete. The bid proposal adheres to the project’s plans and specifications and is available in the City Clerk’s Reading File.

While the City maintains a Support of Local Businesses policy that can be utilized by the City Council when warranted, the City is governed by the California Public Contract Code with regard to public works project procurement. In this type of procurement, the California Public Contract Code does not permit a city to utilize a Support of Local Businesses policy and instead 19 Packet Pg. 272

Page 4 ends

requires the contract be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

Solicitation Process - Materials Testing Services Contract

A Request for Proposal (RFP) for materials testing services was prepared and posted on BidNet on April 24, 2024. The RFP asked firms to identify their relevant experience with similar projects and demonstrate their approach for this project. On May 24, 2024, two firms submitted proposals. Staff reviewed the proposals and, based on their evaluations, scored the firms on a 100-point scale as follows:

Rank Company Location Score

1. Converse Consultants Monrovia, CA 82

2. RMA Group, Inc. Carson, CA 80

The scoring system was based on the following criteria: responsiveness to the RFP and thoroughness of proposal, consultant qualifications and overall project team experience, proposed methodology and ability to meet the scope of work, project understanding, and references.

Converse Consultants demonstrated an in-depth understanding of the project needs and provided a detailed scope of work and approach to the project. Based on their experience with similar projects, and the completeness of their proposal for this project, staff recommends awarding the contract for materials inspection services to Converse Consultants. The proposal is available in the City Clerk’s Reading File.

California Government Code 4526 prescribes selection of architectural and engineering services to be based on demonstrated competence and professional qualification necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required and does not authorize the selection of professional architectural and engineering services based on cost. City staff was able to reach an agreement with Converse Consultants at a fair and reasonable price.

Civil Engineering and Geotechnical Services

The City Council awarded a design contract for a total amount not to exceed $1,276,760 to Psomas at the December 13, 2022, City Council meeting. Psomas was selected through a competitive RFP process and is the Engineer of Record for the project.

In order to provide appropriate construction and design support throughout construction, it is recommended that the existing contract with Psomas be increased by a total of $656,465, including contingency. This increase will allow Psomas to provide construction support at regular meetings, review submittals, respond to requests for information, and address design issues as the project is constructed. The proposal is available in the City Clerk’s Reading File.

The requested budget appropriations will provide for the bid alternates, which includes the exercise stairs and additional parking, as shown on the attached Bid Alternates Exhibit.

The requested contingency for the David March Park contracts will cover the cost of unforeseen 19 Packet Pg. 273

Page 5 ends

site conditions such as potential utility conflicts and fees, abandoned utilities not shown in record drawings, field adjustments, additional work requested by the City, and approved change orders requested by the contractor or consultants.

The remaining project funds will cover all anticipated project administrative costs, including staff time, project management, public works inspections, environmental inspections and support, utility fees, and labor compliance monitoring.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

Upon approval of the recommended actions, budget will be increased by $120,000 in expenditure account P4027305-516101 (Park Dedication - Quimby Funds) and $570,800 in expenditure account P4027723-516101 (Facilities Fund) for a total construction budget of $11,900,000 to support the recommended contracts and associated project costs.

ATTACHMENTS
Bid Alternates Exhibit
Location Map
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Addendum to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
Bid Proposal for Urban Habitat (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Proposal for Converse Consultants (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Proposal for Psomas (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 19 Packet Pg. 274
VIA JOYCE DR.

JERRY PL.

ADRIENE WAY
ARTHUR CT.VIA JOYCE DR.

WERREN PL.

PLUM CANYON RD.

EXERCISESTAIRSADDITIONALPARKING AREA

EXPANDEDPARK AREA

EXISTINGPARK
David March ParkBid AlternatesExhibit

19.a
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Bid Alternates Exhibit (DAVID MARCH PARK - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT)

19.b
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Location Map (DAVID MARCH PARK - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT)

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item: 20

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: June 25, 2024
SUBJECT: VISTA CANYON BRIDGE, PROJECT S3037 – PLANS,

SPECIFICATIONS, CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS, STREET

NAME CHANGE, AND DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC USE AND

ROAD PURPOSES
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PRESENTER: Shannon Pickett

RECOMMENDED ACTION

City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Vista Canyon Bridge, Project S3037.

2. Award the construction contract to Powell Constructors, Inc., in the amount of $27,976,841 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $3,357,221 for a total contract amount not to exceed $31,334,062.

3. Award the professional services contract to MNS Engineers, Inc., to provide construction management, inspection, and quality assurance services, in the amount of $1,626,796 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $162,680, for a total contract amount not to exceed $1,789,476.

4. Award the professional services contract to Compliance Biology, Inc., to provide biological monitoring services, in the amount of $462,110 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $46,210, for a total contract amount not to exceed $508,320.

5. Extend the current contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for civil engineering support services with Alliance Land Planning & Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $85,000 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $8,500, for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $93,500.

6. Extend the current contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for water utility support services with Dexter Wilson Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $14,800 and 20 Packet Pg. 277

Page 2 ends

authorize a contingency in the amount of $1,480, for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $16,280.

7. Extend the current contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for bridge engineering design services with Dokken Engineering, in the amount of $320,000 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $32,000, for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $352,000.

8. Extend the current contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for electrical engineering design services with IDS Group, in the amount of $5,000 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $500, for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $5,500.

9. Extend the current contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for traffic engineering design services with Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc., in the amount of $27,500 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $2,750, for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $30,250.

10. Extend the current contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for soils engineering design services with R.T. Frankian & Associates, in the amount of $313,067 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $31,307 for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $344,374.

11. Extend the current contract and authorize an increased expenditure authority for landscape design services with Yamasaki Landscape Architecture, in the amount of $15,000 and authorize a contingency in the amount of $1,500 for a total additional contract amount not to exceed $16,500.

12. Adopt a resolution authorizing the street name change of the segment of Lost Canyon Road south of Soledad Canyon Road to Vista Canyon Boulevard.

13. Authorize the City Manager or designee to grant an easement for public use and road purposes across City-owned parcels for the Vista Canyon Bridge.

14. Appropriate funds in the total amount of $14,614,009 to the Vista Canyon Bridge, Project S3037, as identified in Attachment A.

15. Authorize the transfer of project savings in the amount of $2,095,000 to Vista Canyon Bridge, Project S3037, as identified in Attachment A.

16. Decrease Vista Canyon Bridge, Project S3037, expenditure account S3037306-516101 (Developer Fees Fund) by $2,000,000.

17. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all documents, subject to City Attorney approval.

20 Packet Pg. 278

Page 3 ends

BACKGROUND

On April 26, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-23, which approved the Vista Canyon project (Master Case 07-127), including the final Conditions of Approval (COA), conditioning Vista Canyon Ranch, LLC (Developer) to construct the Vista Canyon Bridge over the Santa Clara River to connect Soledad Canyon Road to the Vista Canyon development.

On October 25, 2018, the City of Santa Clarita (City) was allocated $20 million in Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Measure R funds for construction of the Vista Canyon Bridge. The allocation requires construction funds to be spent by June 30, 2026, and the Vista Canyon Bridge to be constructed by the City.

On February 13, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-5, which amended the COA for the Vista Canyon project and authorized the City Manager to execute agreements with existing consultants to acquire plans and specifications for the design and construction of the bridge and associated road improvements, providing a connection from Soledad Canyon Road to the Vista Canyon development including the recently completed Vista Canyon Multi-Modal Transit Center as shown on the attached Location Map. This project supports the Enhancing Economic Vitality theme of the City’s five-year strategic plan, Santa Clarita 2025.

The Vista Canyon Bridge, and associated road improvements, will construct a new two-lane bridge spanning approximately 780 feet and will consist of one lane in each direction with a striped median for emergency vehicles, highway safety lighting, concrete barriers, metal railing, a raised landscape planter, and shared-use sidewalk with a Class 1 bike lane and a new bike trail under the bridge. The road improvements will include a new traffic signal at the intersection of Soledad Canyon Road and Lost Canyon Road, new exclusive eastbound left-turn and right-turn lane additions, a lane extension of the existing westbound left-turn lane, and roadway improvements on Lost Canyon Road north of the bridge. The improvements south of the bridge include a roundabout and road improvements to access the Vista Canyon Multi-Modal Transit Center, which includes the Vista Canyon Metrolink Station and the Bus Transfer Station.

The City reviewed the proposed actions in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Per Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations section 15168(c)(2), if a project is proposed which has been the subject of a prior certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and if the agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no new effects could occur or new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the EIR, and no new environmental document would be required.

On April 26, 2011, the City Council certified the Vista Canyon project’s final EIR (SCH No. 2007071039). Authorizing the proposed actions will not result in any new environmental effect not already considered in the final EIR regarding the project. Consequently, no additional environmental review is required.

Solicitation Process - Construction Contract

An invitation to bid was prepared and published twice in The Signal newspaper on April 30 and May 7, 2024, and was posted on the City’s e-procurement system, BidNet. A total of six bids were submitted to the City and opened by Purchasing on June 5, 2024. Each of the bids included 20 Packet Pg. 279

Page 4 ends

a base bid and four alternates. Purchasing conducted a selection process in accordance with California Public Contract Code section 20103.8 (d) which states that “The lowest bid shall be determined in a manner that prevents any information that would identify any of the bidders or proposed subcontractors or suppliers from being revealed to the public entity before the ranking of all bidders from lowest to highest has been determined.” This process was followed to ensure fairness when opening, reviewing, and determining the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

After review of the bids by the project manager, the basis for award was determined to be the total of the base bid and one bid alternate combined. The results of the bids are shown below:

Company Location Total Bid Powell Constructors, Inc. Fontana, CA $27,976,841 MCM Construction, Inc. North Highlands, CA $28,532,581 Griffith Company Brea, CA $29,015,070 C.A. Rasmussen, Inc. Valencia, CA $29,027,458 Ames Construction, Inc. Corona, CA $29,201,266 Security Paving Company Westlake Village, CA $29,801,143

Staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Powell Constructors, Inc., the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, in the amount of $27,976,841, which includes $27,426,436 for the base bid to construct the bridge and $550,405 for bid alternate four to extend Vista Canyon Boulevard from Humphreys Parkway to Mitchell Drive, and authorizing a contingency in the amount of $3,357,221, for a total contract amount not to exceed $31,334,062. This contractor possesses a valid state contractor’s license and is in good standing with the Contractors State License Board. Staff reviewed the bid response for accuracy and conformance to the contract documents and found it to be complete. The bid proposal adheres to the project’s plans and specifications and is available in the City Clerk’s Reading File.

While the City maintains a Support of Local Businesses policy that can be utilized by the City Council when warranted, the City is governed by the California Public Contract Code with regard to public works project procurement. In this type of procurement, the California Public Contract Code does not permit a city to utilize a Support of Local Businesses policy and instead requires the contract be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

The requested construction contingency will cover costs associated with unforeseen site conditions such as potential utility conflicts and fees, abandoned utilities not shown in record drawings, field adjustments, change order requests made by the contractor, and additional work requested by the City.

Solicitation Process - Construction Management, Inspection, and Quality Assurance Services Contract

A Request for Proposal (RFP) for construction management, inspection, and quality assurance services was prepared and posted on BidNet on May 9, 2024. The RFP asked firms to identify their relevant experience with similar projects and demonstrate their approach for this project.

On June 5, 2024, three firms submitted proposals. Staff reviewed the proposals and, based on their evaluations, scored the firms on a 100-point scale as follows:

20 Packet Pg. 280

Page 5 ends

Rank Company Location Score

1. MNS Engineers, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA 96

2. Kane Construction Services, Inc. North Hollywood, CA 72

3. Monterroso Inspections Canyon Country, CA N/A

The scoring system was based on the following criteria: recent experience with similar projects, qualification of team and resources, understanding of key development items, quality of proposal, proposed services in relation to the project’s scope, scheduling, availability, and references. The non-scoring proposal was found to be incomplete as it did not address each of the scope components in the RFP.

MNS Engineers, Inc., demonstrated an in-depth understanding of the project needs and provided a detailed scope of work and approach to the project. Based on their experience with similar projects, and the completeness of their proposal for this project, staff recommends awarding the contract for construction management, inspection, and quality assurance services to MNS Engineers, Inc. The proposal is available in the City Clerk’s Reading File.

While the City maintains a Support of Local Businesses policy that can be utilized by the City Council when warranted, the policy only extends to purchase of supplies, equipment, and services other than Public Works projects and professional services, such as architectural and engineering services.

California Government Code 4526 prescribes selection of architectural and engineering services to be based on demonstrated competence and professional qualification necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required and does not authorize the selection of professional architectural and engineering services based on cost. City staff was able to reach an agreement with MNS Engineers, Inc., at a fair and reasonable price.

Solicitation Process - Biological Monitoring Services Contract

A Request for Proposal (RFP) for biological monitoring services was prepared and posted on BidNet on May 8, 2024. The RFP asked firms to identify their relevant experience with similar projects and demonstrate their approach for this project. On June 3, 2024, four firms submitted proposals. Staff reviewed the proposals and, based on their evaluations, scored the firms on a 100-point scale as follows:

Rank Company Location Score

1. Compliance Biology, Inc. Glendale, AZ 85

2. CJ Biomonitoring LLC Long Beach, CA 82

3. Psomas Pasadena, CA 82

4. Endemic Environmental Services, Inc. Saugus, CA 72

The scoring system emphasized the consultant’s experience and qualifications as they relate to biological monitoring during construction, as well as the following criteria: recent experience with similar projects, qualification of team and resources, understanding of key development 20 Packet Pg. 281

Page 6 ends

items, quality of proposal, proposed services in relation to the project’s scope, scheduling, availability, and references.

Compliance Biology, Inc., demonstrated an in-depth understanding of the project needs and provided a detailed scope of work and approach to the project. Based on their experience with similar projects, and the completeness of their proposal for this project, staff recommends awarding the contract for construction management and support services to Compliance Biology, Inc. The proposal is available in the City Clerk’s Reading File.

California Government Code 4526 prescribes selection of architectural and engineering services to be based on demonstrated competence and professional qualification necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required and does not authorize the selection of professional architectural and engineering services based on cost. City staff was able to reach an agreement with Compliance Biology, Inc. at a fair and reasonable price.

Construction Support Services

The City Council authorized the assignment of nine contracts from the Developer for the design of the Vista Canyon bridge to the City for a combined total amount not to exceed $999,661 at the February 13, 2024, City Council meeting. In order to provide appropriate construction and design support throughout the construction period, it is recommended that seven of the existing contracts be increased by a total of $858,404, including contingency, as shown in the table below. The proposals are available in the City Clerk's Reading File.

Consultant Service Previously
Authorized
Contract
Amount
Additional
Contract
Amount
Additional
Contingency
Amount
Total
Contract
Amount
Alliance Land
Planning &
Engineering,
Inc.

Civil
Engineering
$165,220 $85,000 $8,500 $258,720
Dexter Wilson
Engineering,
Inc.

Water Utility $52,536 $14,800 $1,480 $68,816 Dokken
Engineering
Bridge
Engineering
$506,000 $320,000 $32,000 $858,000
IDS Group Electrical
Engineering
$20,259 $5,000 $500 $25,759
Kimley Horn &
Associates, Inc.

Traffic
Engineering
$32,450 $27,500 $2,750 $62,700
R.T. Frankian &
Associates
Soils
Engineering
$123,723 $313,067 $31,307 $468,097
Yamasaki
Landscape
Architecture
Landscape $12,573 $15,000 $1,500 $29,073 20 Packet Pg. 282

Page 7 ends

Pacific
Advanced
Water
Engineering,
Inc.

Water
Resources and
Embankment
Protection
Engineering
$70,070 N/A N/A $70,070
BJ Palmer &
Associates, Inc.

Electrical
Utility
$16,830 N/A N/A $16,830
Total $999,661 $780,367 $78,037 $1,858,065

This increase will allow the consultants to provide construction support for regular meetings, review submittals, respond to requests for information, provide material testing and inspection services, structural observations, and address design issues as the project is constructed.

The requested contingency will cover the costs of unforeseen design modifications requested by the City and other permitting agencies during construction. This includes potential adjustments to the drawings, engineered grades, and change orders made by the City.

Street Name Change

A portion of Lost Canyon Road intersects Soledad Canyon Road north of the Vista Canyon development. This road extends to the south, approximately 500 feet, and terminates near the Santa Clara River as shown on the attached Location Map. The bridge will connect this road to Vista Canyon Boulevard within the Vista Canyon development. Staff recommends changing the street name for this portion of Lost Canyon Road to Vista Canyon Boulevard.

The City is the entity responsible for authorizing City street name changes and can do so by the adoption of a resolution. The resolution is attached. City staff has coordinated with the Los Angeles County Fire and Sheriff’s Departments, and neither has issues regarding the proposed street name change. There is one commercial center with a Lost Canyon Road address in this roadway segment. Staff has been in contact with the property owner of the commercial center, who is supportive of the street name change.

If the attached resolution is adopted, staff will complete the necessary mail notifications to the United States Postal Service and local utility companies. Subsequently, the City will notify the businesses and the property owner by mail regarding the new street name. New street name signs displaying Vista Canyon Boulevard will also be installed.

Grant of Easements

The Vista Canyon Bridge will be constructed across City-owned parcels and a Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency (SCVWA)-owned parcel as shown on the attached Location Map. A license and indemnity and release agreement between the City and SCVWA has been executed to allow for the construction of the bridge across SCVWA’s parcel. SCVWA will grant a permanent easement for public use and road purposes to the City for the bridge. In addition, staff recommends that the City grant an easement for public use and road purposes along Vista Canyon Boulevard to allow public utility agencies to construct their facilities within the right of way.
20 Packet Pg. 283

Page 8 ends

Budget Appropriation

The requested budget appropriation will provide for construction of the bridge, as well as the bid alternate, for improvements from the bridge to the Vista Canyon Multi-Modal Center, and all anticipated project administrative costs, including, but not limited to, staff time, public works inspections, utility fees, permitting fees, and labor compliance monitoring. The General Fund - Capital (Fund 601) appropriation will be reimbursed through Eastside Bridge and Thoroughfare fees obligated on the Vista Canyon development. Contingent on approval by funding agencies for Measure M multi-year sub-regional program funds, Prop A LR (Fund 261) and TDA Article 8 (Fund 233) appropriations will be adjusted by $7,295,000.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION

Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT

Upon approval of the recommended action, project budget will be increased in expenditure accounts S3037233-516101 (TDA Article 8) by $7,047,865, S3037260-516101 (Prop C LR) by $550,000, S3037261-516101 (Prop A LR) by $861,144, S3037264-516101 (Measure R LR) by $320,000, S3037266-516101 (Measure M LR) by $930,000, and S3037601-516101 (General Fund - Capital) by $7,000,000; and decreased in project expenditure account S3037306-516101 (Developer Fees Fund) by $2,000,000 for a total net appropriation of $14,709,009. Project funding previously budgeted is available in S3037270-516101 (Measure R Hwy Op Fund) and S3037306-516101 (Developer Fees Fund) to support the recommended contracts and associated project costs for a total construction budget of $35,655,000.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Vista Canyon Bridge Project Funding
Location Map
Resolution
Bid Proposal for Powell Constructors, Inc. (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Proposal for MNS Engineers, Inc. (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Proposal for Compliance Biology, Inc. (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Proposals for Construction Support Services (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) 20 Packet Pg. 284
Attachment A: Vista Canyon Bridge (S3037) Project Funding Fund Program/Project Fund Transfer From
Account
Expenditure
Account Amount
Prop A LR Fund 261 S3037261-516101 $861,144
General Fund - Capital Fund 601 S3037601-516101 $7,000,000 TDA Article 8 Fund 233 S3037233-516101 $6,752,865
Total $14,614,009
HSIP Pedestrian Safety
Enhancements, Project
C2027
TDA Article 8 (Fund 233) C2027233-516101 S3037233-516101 $65,000 Newhall Ranch Road and
Bouquet Canyon Road
Intersection Improvements,
Project C4017
TDA Article 8 (Fund 233) C4017233-516101 S3037233-516101 $130,000 2020-21 Overlay and
Slurry Seal Program,
Project M0137
Measure M LR (Fund 266) M0137266-516101 S3037266-516101 $930,000 2021-22 Federal Overlay
and Slurry Seal Program,
Project M0142
Measure R LR (Fund 264) M0142264-516101 S0307264-516101 $320,000 2021-22 Overlay and
Slurry Seal Program,
Project M0144
Prop C LR (Fund 260) M0144260-516101 S3037260-516101 $550,000 2021-22 Overlay and
Slurry Seal Program,
Project M0145
TDA Article 8 (Fund 233) M0145233-516101 S3037233-516101 $100,000 Total $2,095,000
Appropriate Funds to the Vista Canyon Bridge, Project 3037 Authorize Transfer of Project Savings

20.a
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Attachment A: Vista Canyon Bridge Project Funding (VISTA CANYON BRIDGE - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS)

20.b
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Location Map (VISTA CANYON BRIDGE - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS)

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 24- ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE STREET NAME CHANGE OF A SEGMENT OF LOST CANYON ROAD TO VISTA CANYON BOULEVARD – VISTA CANYON BRIDGE AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, S3037

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is a need to change the street name of Lost Canyon Road south of Soledad Canyon Road to provide continuity with the proposed Vista Canyon Boulevard roadway; and

WHEREAS, impacted businesses are in support of the street name change; and

WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Fire Department and Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department have no issue with such a street name change; and

WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita is the designated legislative body to enact a City street name change.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California does hereby resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. That Lost Canyon Road, south of Soledad Canyon Road under State Route 14 to be renamed to Vista Canyon Boulevard.

SECTION 2. That City staff shall install the necessary signs and make official notification to effect this resolution.

SECTION 3. This resolution shall take effect from and after its date of passage, approval, and adoption.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June 2024.

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_______________________________

CITY CLERK

DATE:__________________________

20.c
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Resolution (VISTA CANYON BRIDGE - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS)

Page 2 of 2 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )

I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-_____ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of June 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________

CITY CLERK

20.c
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Resolution (VISTA CANYON BRIDGE - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS)

← All documents from this meeting