Santa Clarita City Council
May 13, 2025

Agenda Item: 1

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: April 22, 2025
SUBJECT: NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
PRESENTER: Erika Iverson

RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:

1. Conduct the public hearing.

2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated and will comply with all mitigation measures established under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.

3. Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134 (Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012) for the construction of a new five-story, mixed-use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A).

BACKGROUND
Request
The proposed project is a request by Serrano Development Group, for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Architectural Design Review (ADR), and Development Review (DR) for the redevelopment of the project site into a new fivestory, mixed-use project and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building located at - 012-022 through -026), within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP).

Project Setting
The project site consists of five parcels within the OTNSP area, totaling three-quarters of an acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Newhall Metrolink Station. Three existing buildings on-site (previously known as Soundsations, a car stereo installation shop); and the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, which is identified as a historic structure in the City of Santa relocated to Valencia, and the building has been used as an office building since.

Project Submittal
On June 28, 2024, an application was submitted for the construction of a new five-story, mixeduse building consisting of 51 residential units, 3,400 square feet of commercial space, and two levels of parking, one subterranean and one at street level, within the Horseshoe on Main properties. On November 27, 2024, the applicant expanded the project footprint to include the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse property, and revised the project scope to include a total of 78 residential units (apartments), and 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area.

GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES
The project site has a General Plan designation of Specific Plan, and is located within the OTNSP. The project site has a zoning designation of AE zone under the OTNSP, which is applied to the central portions of Old Town Newhall, generally aligned with Main Street. The zone intends to promote a mixed-use, walkable neighborhood, with commercial uses along Main Street on the ground floor and residential units on the upper floors. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses (e.g., restaurant and retail use) to the north, west, and south, and the Metrolink station to the east.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Development Proposal
The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing buildings on-site for the full-block development of a new mixed-use building consisting of 78 apartments and 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area. The proposed building would be five stories, 52 feet in height, over one subterranean level of parking. Commercial storefronts would be located at the ground level facing Main Street, with garaged parking behind, within the building footprint. Apartment units would be located on the upper levels and oriented around an internal courtyard located on the second floor. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via two relocated driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. In addition, one existing driveway on Main Street would be closed, allowing for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street.

Parking
Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097) prohibits the City from requiring parking minimums on projects within a half-mile of a major transit stop, unless the project would have a negative impact on the existing parking supply. A parking demand study was prepared by the applicant to demonstrate that sufficient parking would be provided by the project to avoid a substantially negative impact on existing parking supply. A total of 122 parking stalls for the residential units are provided onsite, within ground-floor and subterranean parking levels. Residential guest parking will use public parking stalls and the applicant will utilize the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement.

Below, Table 1 shows the required parking under the OTNSP, the proposed parking to be provided by the project, and the state baseline per AB 2097.

Table 1:

Required Proposed State Baseline
Residential 156 spaces 122 on-site spaces 0 spaces
Guest 39 spaces 20 public spaces 1 0 spaces
Commercial 12 spaces (OTNSP
in-lieu fee) OTNSP in-lieu fee 0 spaces 1 e.g., street or public garage parking Removal of Masonic Lodge/Courthouse
The project proposes the demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, which is currently designated as a historic resource in the OTNSP and Historic Preservation Ordinance.

Under the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section 17.64.090, an applicant can request to modify or demolish a historic resource with the application of an MUP, subject to approval by the City Council. As such, the applicant has requested an MUP to delist the building as a historic resource and to demolish it. In addition, the OTNSP, Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) addresses renovation or demolition of designated historic structures with mitigation measure (MM) CUL-1.

Separately, the property owner of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building received a $22,440 grant (Grant) from the City for building maintenance in 2015. The grant funds would be required General Fund if the building were to be demolished.

The applicant submitted a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society stating the building's historical integrity was compromised by a 1968 remodel, and that it is infeasible to relocate the building. In compliance with MM-CUL-1, the applicant has proposed to commemorate the

building by: (1) recording it through a Historic Architectural Building Survey; (2) installing a commemorative plaque on the new building; (3) placing a dedicatory art installation in the residential lobby; and (4) contributing $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts.

The payment of the $750,000 would be paid to the City for future preservation efforts, and is inclusive of the repayment of the Grant. These commemoration efforts are included as Conditions of Approval (PL6-PL8) for consideration by the City Council.

Proposed Entitlements
Implementation of the project will require the approval of the following entitlements:

Conditional Use Permit 24-007
Required to
first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP.

Minor Use Permit 24-015
Required for the demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, and required for the export of 18,972 cubic yards of dirt.

Adjustment Permit 24-005
Required to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20 percent from OTNSP standards, from 13,650 square feet to 10,929 square feet.

Development Review 24-012 and Architectural Design Review 24-017 Required to ensure that the project, site plan, and architecture complies with all of the provisions of the Unified Development Code, the General Plan, and OTNSP.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR. As described, the project will comply with all required mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 18, 2025, where it received ments from the applicant and
members of the public. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending the City Council approve the proposed project. The mmendation for the City Council to consider the
following Conditions of Approval, which are incorporated into the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A) for the project:

PC1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee agrees to draft a parking management plan in a form approved by the Director of Community Development (Director) for both construction and permanent parking.

PC2. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must provide a plan for the Director
structures during construction.

In addition to recommending the above conditions of approval, the Planning Commission advised that the City Council consider the following when evaluating the project:

1. Consider possible assistance for relocation of the Rafters Alcoholics Anonymous Group, which currently meets in the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building.

2. Consider possible accommodations that could be made during construction for the neighboring property owner (KHTS Radio Station).

3. Consider adjustments to the permitted construction schedule so there are not conflicts with City events in Old Town Newhall.
ile.

NOTICING
All notices as required by law were completed. Property owners and occupants within a 1,000- foot radius of the project site were notified of the public hearing by mail. A public notice was placed in The Signal newspaper on April 1, 2025, and a sign was posted on the project site on April 8, 2025.

As of the writing of this agenda report and issuance of the public notice for this City Council hearing, 37 comment letters have been received. All letters and comments that were received during the noticing period for the Planning Commission meeting are included in the Planning Commission staff report and letters received after publishing, prior to the Planning Commission

CONCLUSION
The Newhall Mixed-Use Project is consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan, SCMC, and OTNSP.
the
OTNSP EIR. Therefore, Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134 (CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24- 012) for the construction of a new five-story mixed-use building delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A).

ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. The applicant would be required to pay various development impact fees, including, but not limited to, Bridge and Thoroughfare and park dedication (Quimby) fees. Upon receipt of the $750,000 contribution, $22,440 would be deposited into the General Fund (Fund 100) for historic preservation grant repayment, and the remaining $727,560 would be deposited into the Site Improvement Fee Fund (Fund 431) to support local historic preservation efforts.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Aerial and Zoning Map
Site & Floor Plans
Elevations & Renderings
Parking Demand Study
Historical Society Letter
Proposal for Demo of Historic Resource
CEQA Notice of Determination
Comment Letters
MC24-134 Prior Hearing Documents (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Comment Letters after PC posting (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)

RESOLUTION NO. 25-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING MASTER CASE 24-134, CONSISTING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW FIVE-STORY,

MIXED-USE BUILDING AND DEMOLITION AND DELISTING OF THE MASONIC LODGE/COURTHOUSE BUILDING LOCATED AT 24300, 24308, 24316 MAIN STREET AND 22505 MARKET STREET S: 2831-012-022
THROUGH -026), IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO THE

ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. The City Council makes the following findings of fact and conclusions:

A. On June 28, 2024, the applicant (Serrano Development Group) initiated Master Case 24-134, consisting of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-007, Minor Use Permit (MUP) 24-015, Adjustment Permit (ADJ) 24-005, Architectural Design Review (ADR) 24-017, and Development Review (DR) 24-012. The properties affected by the initial application are (APN) 2831-012-023 through -026;
B. On November 27, 2024, the application was revised to include an additional property which is APN 2831-012-022;
C. The application was deemed complete on November 27, 2024; D. The project site consists of five parcels totaling approximately three-quarters of an acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. The project proposes to demolish three existing buildings on-site: (24316 Main Street), Soundsations (24300 and 24308 Main Street), and the City Council-designated historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street);
E. The project site is located within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP);
F. The applicant proposes to delist and demolish the existing structures on-site to construct a new five-story mixed-use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area and 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and first-floor parking level. The project includes the closure of one driveway on Main Street and would allow for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requests relief from the requirements of the OTNSP to include a 20-percent reduction from

the shared residential amenity space and to increase the allowable floor area ratio above 200 first-floor footprint;
G. In compliance with Assembly Bill 2097, the applicant is proposing to provide residential and on-street guest parking to avoid a negative impact on commercial and residential parking within one-half mile of the project site, as demonstrated in the parking demand study on file with the Planning division. Specifically, the study proposes to provide a 1.56 residential parking ratio on-site instead of the 2.0 ratio required by the OTNSP. The study also proposes a 0.25 per unit ratio for guest parking to be accommodated on-street, instead of the required

0.5 per unit ratio. The proposed development is utilizing the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement;
H. The project proposes to demolish a building designated as historic by the City Council under the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the OTNSP. The OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measure (MM) CUL-1, which governs the demolition of historical structures. The applicant has submitted a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, which states that this structure is no longer historically significant. The applicant would fulfill the requirements of MM-CUL-1 by recording the building in accordance with a Historic Architectural Building Survey, installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts;
I. On March 18, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City) Planning Commission at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita;
J. During this public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, the staff presentation, the applicant presentation, and public testimony. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending the City Council approve the proposed project. The Planning Commission recommended the addition of two conditions of approval to the project: PC1 requiring the creation of a Parking Management Plan, and PC2 requiring a construction plan to ensure the structural integrity of the neighboring building; K. On April 22, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City), City Council at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; and
L. At this public hearing, the City Council considered the staff report, the staff presentation, the applicant presentation, and public testimony. This resolution, and its findings, are based upon the entire administrative record including, without limitation, the staff reports, testimony, written evidence, and meeting minutes provided during the public hearings.

SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MASTER CASE 24-134. Based upon the foregoing facts and conclusions, the City Council finds as follows:

A. The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR and the project will comply with all

mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. In particular, the applicant would fulfill the requirements of MM-CUL-1. As demonstrated by the letter on file from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse has been substantially altered and no further action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required.

Consequently, a Notice of Determination was prepared for this project in compliance with CEQA;
B. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the City Council is based is the Master Case 24-134 project file. This project file is located within the Community Development department in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and
C. Based upon the findings set forth above, the City Council hereby finds the Notice of Determination for this Project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA.

SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows:

A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation:

The proposed project is consistent with the following policies of the General Plan:

Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth.

Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed-use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed-use zoning.

Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels.

The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed-use building in a walkable and transit-friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes and income levels.

B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan);

The proposed project would be consistent with the following findings of the OTNSP:

OTNSP-1: That the proposed use or project is consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan.

OTNSP-2: That the proposed use or project meets the development requirements for the Zone within which it is located including parking, architecture, and ground-floor uses.

A Stacked Dwelling building type is permitted-by-right in the AE zone of the OTNSP only as part of a vertical mixed-use project with upper floor residential. Any future tenants in the new commercial spaces constructed by the project are subject to the requirements of OTNSP Table 4.2-1, the permitted use chart for the AE zone. A CUP would allow an increase to the allowable Floor Area Ration (FAR) above 200 percent o
for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP. An ADJ is requested to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20 percent from OTNSP standards. The building is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. The proposed project complies with all other development standards for the AE zone and Stacked Dwelling building type. With the Conditions of Approval, the project will comply with Titles 16 and 17 of the SCMC and the OTNSP.

C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and
The proposed project is not located on a hazardous site and would not include any hazardous materials. Standard construction materials and methods would be utilized to ensure safety during construction. The applicant will be required to comply with all applicable laws, including, without limitation: the California Building Standards Code and Fire Code.

Sufficient access for firefighting purposes is provided and verified by the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (LACFD), and the applicant must comply with all LACFD requirements.

D.
suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use;
The subject site includes existing commercial development and surface parking. The parking demand study for the project demonstrates that sufficient parking is provided for the proposed building. The proposed building complies
mixed-use development, including compliance with setbacks, building height, drive-aisle width, and landscaping.

2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would

generate;
The project is accessed via Market Street and Railroad Avenue, and improvements to the roadway are required for the proposed building. The applicant must comply with all City imposed engineering requirements when constructing any improvements in the right-ofway, such as sewer laterals, parkway tree installation, and ADA paths of travel at the driveways. The project will not have a significant effect on vehicle miles traveled or traffic, and existing driveway ingress and egress from the site will be maintained. With tage, the project will comply with all

3. Public protection services (e.g. Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc.) are readily available; and
The project will have public protection services provided by both the Los Angeles LACFD, and will not require any additional
resources or services from those organizations as a result of its operation. The proposal would also be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the LACFD and LASD.

4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site.

The proposed use would be located within an existing commercial area, which is located within a developed urbanized area with available and adequate utilities to serve the site.

The proposed project would connect to this existing infrastructure on-site.

SECTION 4: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FOR THE RELOCATION OR DEMOLITION OF A HISTORIC RESOURCE. As required by SCMC Section 17.64.100, the City Council must approve the relocation or demolition of a property or structure that has been designated as a historic resource. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows:

A. That the City Council must make findings to relocate a historic structure. Alternatively, upon completion of environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition.

As identified in the letter provided by the Santa Clarita Historical Society, relocation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building is not feasible. In addition, the historical integrity of the building was compromised by a remodel in 1968. No interior features remain from its use as a Los Angeles County Courthouse. As described above, the project is consistent with the previously prepared FEIR for the OTNSP, including MM-CUL-1. The applicant is conditioned to record the building in accordance with a Historic Architectural Building Survey, install a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, place a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and make a monetary contribution

of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. Therefore, the requirements of the SCMC and the OTNSP for the delisting and demolition of a building designated as a historic resource are met.

SECTION 5: FINDINGS FOR ADJUSTMENT PERMIT. As required by SCMC Section

17.24.100, based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows:

1. That the adjustment does not authorize a use or activity that is not allowed in the zone; The ADJ is consistent with the development standards of the OTNSP and will not authorize a use or activity that is prohibited under the zone. All proposed uses and activities remain within the scope of the OTNSP. The proposed project furthers the goal of creating a vibrant and active Main Street, and would further enliven the area by providing street-level retail space along with additional residential density in this urban environment.

2. That granting an adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which would otherwise be denied to the property for which the adjustment is sought; and The proposed project meets the intent and goals of the OTNSP, as described above, and provides meaningful shared amenity space as required by the specific plan. The applicant is providing 10,929 square feet of amenity space, 20 percent less than the 13,560 square feet required by the OTNSP. The provided amenities include an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and bike room for residents of the proposed development. The provided amenities meet the intent of the OTNSP and the provided square footage is appropriate given the compact, high-density nature of the development, while remaining within the height requirements of the OTNSP.

3. That the granting of the adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.

As described above, the development, including the granting of the ADJ, will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property as it is providing a reduction to a development standard that has been evaluated and reviewed by all appropriate agencies.

SECTION 6: APPROVALS. The City Council takes the following actions:

Adopt this Resolution approving Master Case 24-134, Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012, for the construction of a new five-story, mixed-use building at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue and the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, subject to the conditions of approval (Exhibit A).

SECTION 7: RELIANCE ON RECORD. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 8: SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 9: NOTICE. The City Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this resolution to the City Council and any other person requesting a copy.

SECTION 10: EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the final decision made on April 22, 2025.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ________ 2025. ______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY CLERK
DATE:__________________________

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________

CITY CLERK

EXHIBIT A
MASTER CASE 24-134
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012

DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the permittee agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa -134.

GENERAL CONDITIONS
GC1. The approval of this project will expire if the approved use is not commenced within two years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the SCMC.

GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval must be terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre-commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of 60 calendar days or more must terminate the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use must not be re-established or resumed after the 60-day period. Discontinuation must include cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume.

GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the conditionally-approved project before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration.

GC4. es the permittee
and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee.

GC5. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspection requirements as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director (Director).

GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the plans date-stamped on file, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein.

GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the SCMC.

GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval.

GC9. When Exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail.

GC10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed.

GC11. The permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020.

GC12. The permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by the City Council.

GC13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director.

GC14. This decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval.

GC15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated.

GC16. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy until the permittee complies with all project conditions.

GC17. Permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys' fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys' fees are paid by the permittee.

PLANNING COMMISSION
PC1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee agrees to develop a parking management plan in a form approved by the Director for both construction and permanent parking.

PC2. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must provide a plan structures during construction.

PLANNING DIVISION
PL1. The permittee is granted approval to construct the Newhall Mixed-Use Project, including a five-story mixed use building located on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project includes 5,223 square feet of first-floor commercial space, 78 residential units on floors two through five, and subterranean and first floor garaged parking consistent with the approved plans on file for Master Case 24-134.

PL2. The construction of the project must be consistent with the approved plans, elevations, colors, materials, and other elements on file with the Planning Division. Any modification to the approved project and plans is subject to further review and approval of the Director.

PL3. The building is approved at the heights shown on the approved elevations and cannot exceed 55 feet in height. Architectural enhancements extending above the roofline are permitted only as shown on the approved plans and may not exceed an additional 12 feet in height.

PL4. The permittee is providing less parking than required by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) pursuant to Government Code § 65863.2. To address the potential for a substantially negative impact to residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site, the permittee must provide a minimum of 122 parking stalls on-site (1.56 stalls per unit residential parking ratio). Tandem stalls are permitted as shown on the approved site plan. Guest parking is satisfied with 20 public on-street stalls (0.25 stalls per unit guest parking ratio).

PL5. In lieu of constructing 12 parking stalls for the commercial portion of the project, the permittee is required to pay $70,261.20 ($5,855.10 per required parking stall) into the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu Fee Program before the Building Official issues any building permit. This fee is subject to revision and the applicant will be responsible for the fee in place at the time the fee is paid
PL6. Before any permit is issued including, without limitation, a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, the permittee must complete all required recordation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, as required by the OTNSP FEIR MM-CUL-1 and Council.

PL7. Before the Building Official issues a demolition permit, the permittee must donate $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts.

PL8. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install a commemorative plaque on the building exterior and provide an art installation within the lobby to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building.

PL9. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must obtain a Temporary Use Permit and install two murals on the North Elevation as shown on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division.

PL10. The uses in the commercial building are subject to the permitted use chart for the AE zone of the OTNSP.

PL11. All roof-mounted and ground-mounted equipment must be screened from public view.

PL12. No signage is approved by this permit. All future signage requires a sign permit application in accordance with the OTNSP. Exposed neon is not permitted.

Landscaping Conditions
LR1. Before the City Engineer issues grading permit(s), the permittee must provide final landscape, light
review and approval. The Landscape Document Package must be prepared by a California-registered landscape architect and must be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20º to 30º F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105º F to 110º F). The Landscape Document Package must meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as well as all other SCMC requirements.

LR2. The permittee is required to pay all associated fees to the City before the release of the approved Landscape Document Package for the project.

LR3. The permittee must coordinate with the Director of Administrative Services regarding any landscaping installed on City right-of-way. The Director of Administrative Services must review the landscape and irrigation plans when submitted, and all such landscaping must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services before installation. The permittee must receive final approval for the installed landscape before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy.

LR4. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install all proposed irrigation and landscaping, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection.

LR5. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must submit to the Director a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation were installed and function according to the approved Landscape Document Package.

ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
General Requirements
EN1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must provide an approval letter from Southern California Edison (Distribution Division and/or Transmission Division, as appropriate) and from all other affected utilities for the proposed grading and improvements adjacent to their existing facilities, as required by the City Engineer.

EN2. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, all new and existing power lines and overhead cables less than 34 KV within or fronting the project site must be installed underground by the permittee.

Certificate of Compliance Requirements
EN3. Before the Building Official issues any building permit, a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment encompassing all parcels within the boundaries of this project prepared by or under the direction of a person licensed to practice land surveying in the State of California must be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; in compliance with applicable law
Grading and Geology Requirements
EN4. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit a grading plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. The grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations, including seismic hazards associated with liquefaction.

EN5. Before the Building Official issues building permit, the permittee must construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain rough grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer, or designee.

EN6. This project anticipates export of 18,972 CY of dirt. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit for this project, the permittee must submit a copy of the grading permit for the receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The permittee is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the dirt hauling operation.

A. The permittee must comply with the following requirements for the dirt hauling operation:
i. Obtain an encroachment permit for the work.
ii. The hours of operation must be between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. iii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

B. The permittee must pay a Haul Route Pavement Repair Security Cash Deposit (Deposit) of $75,000, which may be increased or decreased based upon an estimated cost to complete the repairs of streets damaged during the dirt hauling operation. The limits and scope of the repairs is determined by the City Engineer. To receive a refund of the Deposit, the permittee or subsequent property owners must complete the pavement repairs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within one year from the completion of the dirt hauling operation. If the pavement repairs are not completed within one year, the City may use the Deposit to complete the repairs. Any funds remaining at the completion of the repairs will be refunded to the permittee. If the Deposit is insufficient to complete the repairs, the City will seek additional funds from the permittee.

C. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any pavement damaged by the dirt hauling operation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of the road repairs must be consistent with the approved haul route.

EN7. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must obtain and submit to Engineering Services Division a notarized Letter of Permission for review and approval for grading over easements/outside of the property lines from the affected easement holder/adjacent property owner(s).

Drainage Requirements
EN8. Before the City Engineer, or designee issues a grading permit, the permittee must have the site drainage study approved by the City Engineer demonstrating that postdevelopment flows from the site will not be increased from pre-development flows, or mitigate for the increase.

Water Quality Requirements
EN9. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit to Engineering Services Division for review and approval an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan.

Street Light Relocation Requirements
EN10. Before street plan approval, the permittee must submit a revised Street Light Plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must relocate the existing street light along Railroad Avenue per the approved revised plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Street Improvement Requirements
EN11. Before the revised street plan approval and any construction within public street right-ofway, the permittee must submit to the City Engineer or designee a revised street improvement plan for review and approval to obtain encroachment permits from the City Engineer, or designee.

EN12. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee is required to dedicate a portion of its property to City for public right-of-way to meet the requirements of SCMC Section

17.55, creating a clear sight triangle ensuring unobstructed views for drivers. Permittee may, but is not required to, reserve property rights to include all projections, such as awnings, within the airspace of the dedicated public right-of-way. Such reservation must be approved as to form by the City Attorney.

EN13. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee must submit a street tree location plan to the Urban Forestry Administrator for review and approval. The plan must include proposed sewer lateral locations, storm drain infrastructure, and trees must not conflict with the proposed infrastructure.

EN14. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant Curb Ramp (per the Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC), Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) along the property frontage corner at the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street and dedicate necessary easement to the City, as directed by the City Engineer.

EN15. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an ADA compliance Curb Ramp (per SPPWC Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) at all three other corners of the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street per the State of California DOT Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 82-06 and as directed by the City Engineer. Railroad Avenue is designated as a State Route and any modification at the intersection, requires existing nonstandard curb ramps to be reconstructed to current standards per DIB 82-06.

EN16. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must dedicate sidewalk easements sufficient to encompass ADA requirements for sidewalks installed with drive approaches per the current SPPWC Standard Plan 110-2, Type C, or equivalent.

EN17. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must replace the abandoned driveway(s) with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement in accordance with SPPWC standards and in compliance with OTNSP, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A revised street plan and encroachment permit is required.

EN18. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk, and refurbish the half section of pavement on streets abutting the project, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Sewer Improvement Requirements
EN19. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the proposed building(s) lateral line(s) must connect to the existing public sewer main in Market Street Division regarding payment of additional annexation fees, if required, to annex the property into the County Sanitation District.

EN20. The on-site sewer is a privately maintained. Before grading plan approval, the permittee -site sewer plan. - are designed per the
California Plumbing Code and approved by the Building Official before Grading Plan approval.

EN21. Before the Building Official issues Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct all sewer upgrades per the approved sewer area study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

EN22. The permittee must also obtain a permit from LA County Building Official to install a new saddle on the existing public sewer by LA County Sewer Maintenance Division, if the wye does not exist on the existing public sewer.

Bond, Fees and Miscellaneous Requirements
EN23. Before City Engineer, or designee issue encroachment permits for public improvements (Street), the permittee, by agreement with the City Engineer, must guarantee installation of the improvements through faithful performance bonds, letters of credit or any other acceptable means in a form approved by the City Attorney. Certificate of Occupancy/Occupancies are withheld if the improvements are not completed.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
TE1. Before the City Engineer issues street plan approval, the permittee must show on the street plan drive approaches using a modified commercial driveway design (APWA 110- 2, Type C or equivalent) that will provide a street/drive approach transition with a maximum algebraic grade difference of 10%. Construction details will be shown on the street plan providing a transition no greater than this maximum.

TE2. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must modify the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street to eliminate the curb bulbout on the southbound (Railroad Avenue) approach.

TE3. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must restripe Market Street per the attached exhibit (Striping Exhibit Market Street) to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.

TE4. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee will pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project. This project is located in the Via Princessa B&T District. The current rate for this District is $22,710. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment.

Standard B&T Fee Calculation:

Apartments = the number of units (78) x the district rate ($22,710) x 0.7 = $1,239,966 B&T District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division must be calculated as follows:

Retail Commercial = 5,223 sf x $22,710 x 5 = $36,306
16,335

LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
FD1. All fire lanes must be clear of all encroachments and must be maintained in accordance with Section 503 of County of Los Angeles Fire Code, Title 32, as adopted by the SCMC, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving.

FD2. Main Street, Market Street & Railroad Avenue serve as the Fire Apparatus Access roads for this project. For buildings where the vertical distance between the access roadway and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet from the lowest level of the Fire Apparatus Access Road, provide a minimum unobstructed width of 28 feet, exclusive of shoulders and an unobst clear to s
within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. At least one required access route meeting this condition must be located such that the edge of the Fire Apparatus Access Roadway, not including shoulders, that is closest to the building being served, is between 10 feet and 30 feet from the building, as determined by the fire code official, and must be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the Fire Apparatus Access Road is positioned must be approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.1.1; 503.2.1.2; 503.2.1.2.2 & 503.2.1.2.2.1).

FD3. The dimensions of the approved Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be maintained as originally approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.2.2.1).

FD4. Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing 75,000 pounds and must be surfaced to provide allweather driving capabilities (Fire Code 503.2.3).

FD5. A minimum 5-foot-wide approved firefighter access walkway leading from the Fire Department Access Road to all required openings in the building's exterior walls must be provided for firefighting and rescue purposes (Fire Code 504.1).

FD6. Security barriers, visual screen barriers or other obstructions must not be installed on the roof of any building in such a manner as to obstruct firefighter access or egress in the event of fire or other emergency. Parapets must not exceed 42 inches from the top of the parapet to the roof surface on more than two sides. These sides should face an access roadway or yard sufficient to accommodate ladder operations (Fire Code 504.5).

FD7. All fire hydrants -1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4).

FD8. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants for this project is 3500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for 3 hours. Three public fire hydrants flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow (Fire Code 507.3 & Appendix B).

FD9. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system is required for the proposed buildings within this development. Submit design plans to the Fire Department Sprinkler Plan Check Unit for review and approval before installation.

FD10. Install 1 public fire hydrant as noted by the Fire Department. All required public fire hydrants must be installed, tested and accepted before beginning construction. All fire -1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA
standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4).

FD11. A digital copy of the Water Plans for the required public fire hydrant must be submitted to the Fire Department's Land Development Unit for review and approval. Compliance is required before project construction. Submittal must be provided through EPIC-LA using the following Plan Type: Fire Land Development Water Plan & System Review.

BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION
Plans and Permits
BS1. Construction drawings must be prepared and submitted to the Building & Safety Division for plan review and building permit issuance. Supporting documents; such as structural and energy calculations, and geotechnical reports must be included with the plan submittal.

BS2. The submitted site plan must show all parcel/lot lines, easements, fire separation distances, restricted use areas, etc. Any construction proposed in an easement must obtain nes
that overlap any proposed buildings must be removed (lot line adjustment) before the Building Official issues a building permit.

BS3. Construction drawings must incorporate mitigation measures identified by a noise study prepared by a qualified noise engineer.

Electric Vehicle Parking Spaces for the residential portion of the project per CalGreen BS4. EV Ready parking spaces with receptacles for the multi-family portion of the project must be equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles at the rate of 40% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. For the receptacle power source and configuration see CalGreen 4.106.4.2.2.

BS5. Additionally, EV Ready parking spaces with EV chargers for the multi-family portion of the project must be equipped with Level 2 EV chargers at the rate of 10% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. At least 50% of these EV chargers must be equipped with J1772 connectors.

Accessibility for the residential portion of the project BS6. All applicable disabled access requirements of California Building Standards Code (CBSC) Chapter 11A, as adopted by the SCMC, must be shown on the architectural plans versus civil plans.

BS7. If the project receives any public funds such as tax credits, incentives or similar programs the multi-family project must comply with the public housing requirements of the California Building Code, Chapter 11B.

Soil Reports and Grading
BS8. A complete soils and geology investigation report will be required for this project. The report must be formally submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The recommendations of the report must be followed and incorporated into the plans for the project.

Hazard Zones
BS9. Indicate on the cover sheet of the plans this project IS NOT LOCATED in a Fire Hazard Zone, IS NOT LOCATED in the Flood Hazard Zone, and IS NOT LOCATED in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.

Additional Information
BS10. Separate Demolition Permit will be required to raze any building to be removed on the site. Clearances from the City Planning Division, City Environmental Services (for construction demolition deposit) and AQMD will be required before the Building Official issues a demolition permit.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
ES1. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must demonstrate appropriate, detailed safety measures for resident access to organics bins as well as to bins with chute connections.

ES2. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide co -ou ice provided by the waste hauler, to avoid the need for a bin staging area along Market Street.

ES3. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide elevations and/or site plans for the chute system that identify the correct location and placement of both chutes and corresponding bins within the trash rooms.

ES4. Before a building, demolition, or grading permit is issued, the permittee must submit a Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) and receive approval from the Environmental Services Manager or Designee if the project meets the parameters below (S.C.M.C.§15.46.300):

A. All demolition projects (regardless of valuation), all commercial projects of new construction or additions over 1,000 square feet and all tenant improvements, alterations or new construction valued greater than $200,000, all new residential construction projects and all residential additions and improvements that increase building area, volume, or size must truction and
Demolition Materials (C&D) Recycling Ordinance. S.C.M.C.§15.46.200 B.
65% of the remaining C&D waste must be recycled or reused rather than disposing in a landfill. S.C.M.C.§15.46.610 and CALGreen sections 4.408, 5.408, 301.1.1 and 301.3
C. For renovation or tenant improvement projects and new construction projects, a deposit of 2% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. For demolition projects, a deposit of 10% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. The full deposit will be returned to the permittee upon proving that 65% of the inert and remaining C&D waste was recycled or reused. S.C.M.C.§15.46.400
ES5. All projects within the City that are not self-hauling waste materials must use one of the -off bin collection services.

S.C.M.C.§15.44.220

PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION
PR1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must pay the required ired to provide
a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the fair market value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Final Parkland dedication obligation calculation to be based on current density per dwelling and fair market value rates at time of payment. An estimate is attached.

TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DIVISION
TS1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a Grading Permit, the permittee must demonstrate compliance with SCMC Section 17.51.007 (Connected City Infrastructure Program) requiring conduit from a location to be determined in the public right-of-way to the Minimum Point of Entry (MPOE) or similar location within the project area that serves as the main telecommunications closet. Conduit for this condition must be reflected on development plans.

TRANSIT DIVISION
TR1. The current Transit Impact Fee is $216 per residential unit. Permittee must pay the fee in place at the time of building permit issuance.

SPECIAL DISTRICTS
SD1. This permittee is required to protect and preserve in place all existing Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) landscape located within the public right of way along Main Street and Market Street. For this project, landscape includes without limitation, trees, shrubs, irrigation, lighting, electrical outlets, pilasters with Trex / wood cross rails, decking, brick pavers, brick planters, raised planters, wrought iron, potted plants on city irrigation, and any other amenity items located within the existing landscape planters and walkways.

SD2. This project is located within the Downtown Newhall Corridor and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. As a result, all required landscape improvements must be consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plans and design guidelines.

SD3. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to install full landscape improvements along Main Street where the current drive connect the two existing planters located on opposite sides of the drive approach. The current preliminary plan is showing a Schinus molle
proposed tree in this area. Schinus molle is not an approved tree and must be replaced with an approved species.

SD4. New landscape includes without limitation: connecting to and extending the brick pavers (walkway), existing planters, irrigation, and the installation of new planters consisting of trees shrubs, lighting and other landscape features similar to those in the existing planters.

SD5. Before the City Engineer issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit final landscape plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect and receive approval by LMD.

SD6. Existing parkway trees and landscape along Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue are required to be protected and preserved in place. This may include having to install approved temporary protective fencing around the edge of the planters to protect trees, shrubs, irrigation and other landscape amenities located within the planter during construction.

SD7. Unless waived by the Director of Administrative Services, the planter located at the back must be protected and preserved in place. If this planter cannot be protected in place, the permittee will be required to repair and / or replace this planter to the satisfaction of the Director of Administrative Services.

SD8. Full parkway landscape improvements will be required along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. These landscape improvements must be consistent with the improvements currently along Railroad Avenue and 5th Street fronting the Hotel Lexen. This includes installing amenities such as bollard / hitching post, and protected electrical outlets.

SD9. If at any time during the project, the irrigation to any existing landscape is turned off, the permittee and their contractors will be responsible to provide supplemental irrigation / water to all trees and shrubs throughout the duration of the project by any means necessary at no cost to the City. Trees and shrubs which die, or decline to a condition unacceptable by Director of Administrative Services, must be replaced by the permittee at no cost to the City.

SD10. The permittee is responsible for replacing any missing landscape shrubs in the planters fronting the project site.

SD11. The permittee is responsible for replacing or repairing any damaged or missing pavers or decking located within the public right-of-way fronting the project on both Main Street and Market Street.

SD12. The permittee is required to show all existing landscape which fronts the project on Main Street to scale on all future sets of site plans including, without limitation; demolition, grading, construction and landscape plans (preliminary and final).

SD13. At no time is any construction material, equipment or vehicles permitted to be stored or placed within a landscape planter where trees and shrubs exist. At no time is any form of hazardous material including runoff water from washing and cleaning of tools and equipment be permitted to enter any existing or proposed landscape planter.

SD14.
time will any parkway tree be pruned for sign visibility. This information must be included with all paperwork for all future tenants.

SD15. Any impacts to root system of an existing City maintained tree must be approved by the completed by hand in the presence of a qualified consulting arborist with documented experience with monitoring trees during construction. The permittee will be required to retain the services of a qualified consulting arborist to perform all required monitoring.

This will be completed at no cost to the City of Santa Clarita.

Landscape Maintenance Districts
SD16. These parcels are located within LMD Zone 28, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscapes located in the Newhall area. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to methodology.

SD17. These parcels are located within LMD Areawide Zone 2008-1, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscaped medians on major thoroughfares located throughout the City of Santa Clarita. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to the Areawide Zone in a manner reflective of this zon ssessment methodology.

Streetlight Maintenance District
SD18. These parcels were originally annexed by County of Los Angeles into a Lighting District with a maximum assessment of $12.38 per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Unit) without a cost of living index/escalator. The permittee will be required to annex all parcels into the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (SCLLD), Street-lighting Zone B. The District funds the operation and maintenance of various landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the District.

SD19. As part of any required street improvements, the permittee may be required to add, relocate, or update streetlights along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. All streetlights and their locations must be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance District (SMD).

AERIAL AND ZONING MAP
Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Development Review 24-012, and Architectural Design Review 24-017 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street s Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)
Aerial Map
Zoning Map

ZONING KEY
Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Arts & Entertainment
Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Neighborhood
S:\CD\!PLANNING DIVISION\CURRENT\!2024\MC24-134 (ADJ, ADR, DR, CUP, MUP Market & Main Mixed-Use)\5. Planning Commission\3. MC24-134 Aerial and Zoning Map.doc

AE (OTNSP)

N (OTNSP)
Project Site

SITE & FLOOR PLANS
Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)

ELEVATIONS & RENDERINGS
Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)

February 5, 2025
Tai Lane
Serrano Development Group
24 N. Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91101
LLG Reference No. 2.24.4807.1
Subject: Parking Demand Analysis for the
Downtown Newhall Mixed-Use Project
Santa Clarita, California
Dear Ms. Lane:

As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Demand Analysis for the proposed mixed-used project development in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. The project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue.

The Project proposes to demolish three existing retail buildings to construct a 78-unit multifamily development, inclusive of 5,223 square-feet (SF) of ground floor retail.

Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 67 spaces, inclusive of 26 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 55 spaces, inclusive of 18 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 122 spaces.

Based on our understanding, a detailed parking assessment is needed to justify a reduced parking requirement for the site when compared to the City’s code parking requirements. As such, the following items have been considered.

Parking requirements documented in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022
Research of relevant parking reductions (i.e. Assembly Bill 2097, ITE, other comparable Cities, etc.)
Hourly off-site parking demand counts in the immediate area of the Project Tai Lane
February 5, 2025

N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc

PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Location and Description
The proposed Project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. Figure 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the overall Project site in the context of the surrounding street system.

The proposed Project includes the development of a five-story building, with basement, consisting of 78 apartment units, above a two-level parking structure. The Project’s unit mix will consist of 39 one-bedroom units, 35 two-bedroom units, and 4 three-bedroom units, with 5,223 square-feet (SF) of ground floor retail space.

Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 67 spaces, inclusive of 26 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 55 spaces, inclusive of 18 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 122 spaces. Table 1, attached to this letter, provides a summary of the Project development, inclusive of the Project’s proposed parking supply. Figure 2 presents the proposed Project site plan prepared by SAE Architecture Interiors. As shown on Figure 2, with the closure of the existing driveway on Main Street, an additional 3 on-street parking spaces will be provided with the construction of the proposed Project.

PARKING ANALYSIS
Code Parking Requirements
The code parking calculation for the residential component of the Project is based on the City’s requirements as outlined in Chapter 17.42 – Residential Use Types of the City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code while the commercial component of the Project is based on the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022. Based on the above the City’s Code specifies the following parking requirements:

Multifamily Residential: two (2) space per unit plus one-half (0.5) space per unit for guest parking
Retail: 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF
Tai Lane
February 5, 2025

N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc On that basis, Table 2 presents the code parking requirements for the proposed Project. Review of the upper portion of Table 2 presents the residential component which identifies a 195-space requirement. When compared to the proposed on-site parking supply of 122 spaces, a 73-space code-calculated shortfall is indicated. It should be noted that based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated. Later in the letter provides further justification and recommendations.

The lower portion of the Table 2 shows the commercial component which identifies that 12 spaces are required. The Old Town Newhall Specific Plan identifies a Parking In-Lieu Fee program for which the Project would be required to contribute to. The fee would be applied to the commercial parking component of the Project, as determined by the City. The fee shall be established by separate resolution of the City Council.

Funds collected by the City from fee payments may be used to finance the creation or expansion of public parking through the purchase of property and the construction of new facilities, including debt service and signage that identifies the location of parking within the business district. As such, the Project’s retail parking requirements will be satisfied via its contribution towards this Parking In-Lieu Fee program.

Assembly Bill 2097
The City’s residential parking ratio of 2.0 spaces per unit is considered high when compared to ITE, other Cities and based on empirical data. As such, it is recommended that a reduced parking ratio be applied to the residential component of the Project.

Further, given the location of the Project, which is across the street from the Metrolink Train Station, Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097), which states the following, would be applicable to the Project.

This bill would prohibit a public agency from imposing any minimum automobile parking requirement on any residential, commercial, or other development project, as defined, that is located within ½ mile of public transit, as defined.

Due to the project’s proximity to the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station, AB 2097 can be applied to the Project. However, per the City of Santa Claritia Director’s Policy:

Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024, for AB 2097 to be applied to the Project it must demonstrate that the reduced parking requirement would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project. As such, research of the following parking ratios was considered for the Project.

Tai Lane
February 5, 2025

N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc TOD Multifamily Residential Parking Ratios
Research of multifamily residential code requirements has been conducted. Table 3 presents the parking requirements from ITE and other cities in the region. Review of the first column from Table 3 presents the residential parking requirements for Santa Clarita. The other columns presents the ITE parking requirements and other City parking requirements for Transit Oriented Developments (TOD’s).

Review of Table 3 shows that multiple sources have multifamily parking ratios well below the City of Santa Clarita code ratio. As such, it can be concluded that the City’s ratio is considered high and a reduced parking ratio would be appropriate. It should be noted that the City code parking requirement for resident guest of 0.5 spaces per unit is also considered high. As such, it is recommended that a ratio of 0.25 spaces per unit be applied to the resident guest component of the Project.

Empirical Parking Ratios For Multifamily Residential
Individual multifamily residential projects and local settings may have unique parking characteristics that may not be well represented in typical city code requirements.

There are increasing concerns among parking/traffic engineering and planning experts over City code parking ratios and parking minimums being outdated, causing multifamily developments to have either inadequate or excessive supply, and that the “one-size-fits-all” approach to estimating parking requirements inherent in city parking codes may not reflect actual, more current and realistic parking needs, operations, and management.

Notwithstanding the requirements of Santa Clarita’s City code, the actual parking requirements for multifamily residential uses have been found to be less than the City’s own Code requirement as illustrated by LLG’s previous field studies of actual parking demand at existing sites.

Table 4 presents a comparison of site development and parking ratios from the thirteen (13) apartment communities in southern California, inclusive of the source of parking survey data. Additional details for the comparable sites are also provided inclusive of the location, development summary, parking facility type, and parking supply. It should be noted that the ratios provided in Table 4 include demand related to resident and resident guest.

It should be noted that sites 12 and 13 in Table 4 were included per direction of the City to include additional comparable sites that are more aligned with the size of Project.

Tai Lane
February 5, 2025

N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc Both Edgeway and Newhall Crossings provide subterranean gated parking for their residents. Appendix A presents the parking demand count sheets for these sites.

Review of the rightmost column of Table 4 presents the tenant and guest peak parking ratio (spaces per unit) for each of the comparable sites. This array of peak parking rates yields an average ratio of 1.28 spaces per unit, an 85th percentile ratio of 1.43 spaces per unit, and a 95th percentile ratio of 1.46 spaces per unit. Direct comparison between the 95th percentile ratio of 1.46 to what the Project is proposing, which is

1.56 spaces per unit shows the Project would exceed the 95th percentile by 0.10 spaces per unit. It should be noted that the 95th percentile ratio includes demand related to the resident guest component. Therefore, the projected surpluses in parking would be approximately 0.25 spaces per unit greater than what is identified. Given the above, LLG concludes that the parking ratios derived from the thirteen comparable sites are accurate representations for the unique parking characteristics of the proposed Project that are not reflected in the City code ratio and would be a good indicator of the parking demand of the proposed Project. It should also be noted that twelve (12) of the thirteen (13) sites observed were not directly across from a train station and as a result larger surpluses could occur. The thirteenth site observed is located approximately 650 feet north of the site along Main Street within walking distance to the train station.

Closer inspection of the parking demand data shows that the resident component of that project is gated and does not allow for guest parking to occur within the gated areas. As such, the parking ratio for the residential component, excluding the resident guest component, of the Newhall Crossings apartment project is 1.07 spaces per units (gated demand 48 spaces divided by 45 occupied units = 1.07 spaces per unit). The ratio of

1.07 excludes any resident guest or commercial employee/guest since they park in the public parking structure. It should be noted that Newhall Crossing was approved at a ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit, but they provided 1.85 spaces per unit. The Newhall Crossings project is considered the most appropriate site for comparison since it has a similar number of units, is located in close proximity to the site, would likely have similar resident demographics and is located in walking distance to the Metrolink Station. As such, it can be concluded that the residential component of the Project is considered to have ample parking to support its needs.

Resident Guest Parking Requirements
As noted above, the project will not provide on-site parking to support the resident guest component of the project and will rely on public on-street parking within the vicinity of the project. The residential guest would require 20 spaces based on the assumption of

0.25 spaces per unit.

Tai Lane
February 5, 2025

N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc To further assess the parking requirements of the Project and the potential for the Project to utilize “off-site” parking within public on-street parking areas, parking demand surveys were conducted hourly within the vicinity of the site from 9:00 AM through 9:00 PM by AimTD on Thursday and again on Saturday (April 25 and 27, 2024). All parked vehicles during each hourly survey round were counted and recorded. In addition, the parking counts were conducted on a weekend while shows were scheduled at the Canyon Theatre Guild which would be representative of an “active evening”. Figure 3 presents the key parking areas which would be available for use by the Project. Appendix B contains the weekday and weekend survey data.

Tables 5 and 6 present the weekday and weekend shared parking approach for the proposed Project and compares the forecasted hourly parking demand of the Project against the available parking surplus in off-site areas, respectively. Column (1) presents parking survey data collected along the on-street spaces within the vicinity of the site. Column (2) presents the ULI shared parking demand of the resident guest.

Column (3) presents the expected joint-use parking demand on an hourly basis, while Column (4) summarizes the hourly parking surplus/deficiency for the Project compared to the on-street parking supply of 135 based on the existing supply of 132 spaces plus 3 additional on-street spaces created by the project as a result of closing the driveway on Main Street. Appendix C presents the detailed shared parking table.

As indicated in Column (4) of Table 5, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 112 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 23 spaces when compared to the proposed on-street parking supply of 135 spaces. As indicated in Column (4) of Table 6, the weekend evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 131 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 4 spaces when compared to the proposed on-street parking supply of 135 spaces. As such, Tables 5 and 6 shows that based on the ULI shared parking profiles for the proposed Project, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on-street parking within the area of the Project.

PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP)
To ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants and guests of the Project, it is recommended that when the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company deems it necessary, the following key Parking Management Strategies be implemented by the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company:

The PMP should identify where location of short-term parking spaces for potential tenants and use by the leasing office.

Tai Lane
February 5, 2025

N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc The PMP should restrict residents to parking in their assigned garage spaces.

The PMP should provide rules of conduct for tenants and guests to abide by.

Strict enforcement shall be adhered to.

PMP Measures
The following measures are available to the Project to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies in the event the proposed onsite parking supply is determined to be greater than what is provided.

Residential Component

1. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall assign one (1) parking space to every unit. Additional spaces may be assigned to any unit that requests additional assigned spaces dependent on the number of bedrooms provided within said unit. Residents may not park more than two (2) vehicles in the complex. The 2 nd access/tandem spaces should be assigned to two-bedroom and three-bedroom units, however the Property Owner/Property Management Company has the flexibility to assign the 2nd access/tandem spaces to one-bedroom units. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall determine the allocation of parking spaces for resident tenants, inclusive of spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants.

2. Residents will be provided a transponder or similar device (fob or key card, etc.) for remote access to the gated residential parking area within the Project’s apartment parking structure.

3. Every resident will be required to register their vehicle. The registered owner must be a lease holding resident. No permits will be issued to non-lease holders, or vehicles not registered to a lease holder. This registration will be updated annually at the time of recertification.

4. Vehicles lacking current registration will not be issued a permit. Vehicles that have lapsed registration will be towed by the Property Owner/Property Management Company. The storage of inoperable or unregistered vehicles is prohibited.

5. Vehicles may not occupy unassigned spaces for more than twenty-four (24) hours, without contacting the leasing office in advance. Violators are subject to towing at the vehicle owner’s expense.

Tai Lane
February 5, 2025

N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc

6. If you obtain a new vehicle, you must provide new registration and will be given a new permit (transferring permits is not permissible).

7. Violation of the PMP strategies contained herein may result in the towing of the vehicle at the vehicle owner’s expense.

8. The enforcement of resident on-site parking requirements summarized herein will be handled by the Property Owner/Property Management Company to ensure compliance.

Through this monitoring and cooperation with the residents as a result of the annual review/monitoring, a partnership will be formed to ensure that residential tenants and retail employees and Management Company personnel on the property work together to ensure adequate parking is available.

CONCLUSIONS
Based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated.

Review of the data supports a reduced parking ratio. It can be concluded that the proposed residential ratio provided by the Project of 1.56 can adequately support the needs for the residential component. In addition, the commercial parking requirement of twelve (12) parking stalls will be waived via the parking in-lieu fee program identified in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan.

Furthermore, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 113 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 22 spaces when compared to the proposed on-street parking supply of 135 spaces. Additionally, the weekend evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 131 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 4 spaces when compared to the proposed on-street parking supply of 135 spaces. As such, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on-street parking within the area of the Project.

To ensure adequate parking is provided, the Project has the ability to implement a PMP, inclusive of assignment of tandem stalls for specific units, to maintain adequate parking for all residents of the Project. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Project would adhere to the City of Santa Claritia Director’s Policy: Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024, and would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project.

Tai Lane
February 5, 2025

N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc * * * * * * * * * *
We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 825- 6175.

Very truly yours,
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Richard E. Barretto, P.E.

Principal
cc: Shane S. Green, P.E., Senior Transportation Engineer Attachments

TABLE 1
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY1

DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Land Use / Project Description
Basement Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Residential Component
1 Bedroom -- -- 9 units 10 units 10 units 10 units
2 Bedrooms -- -- 8 units 9 units 9 units 9 units
3 Bedrooms -- -- 1 unit 1 units 1 units 1 units
Total Residential Units: -- -- 18 units 20 units 20 units 20 units Retail/Commercial Component
Retail Shop A -- 1,744 SF -- -- -- --
Retail Shop B -- 1,460 SF -- -- -- --
Retail Shop C -- 2,019 SF -- -- -- --
Total Retail/Commercial Space: -- 5,223 SF -- -- -- --
Parking Structure Supply
1 st Access Space 41 spaces 37 spaces -- -- -- --
2 nd Access (Tandem) Space 26 spaces 18 spaces -- -- -- -- Total Parking Supply 67 spaces 55 spaces -- -- -- -- 1 Source: SAE Architecture | Interiors, Site Plan dated November 4, 2024 N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc TABLE 2

CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT

DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Land Use / Project Description Size Parking Ratio2 SpaceRequir Multifamily Apartments
One (1) Bedroom Units 39 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 78
Two (2) Bedroom Units 35 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 70
Three (3) Bedroom Units 4 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 8
Resident Guest 78 DU 0.5 spaces per unit 39
Total 78 units 195
A. Total Residential Parking Code Requirement: 195
B. Proposed Residential Parking Supply: 122
C. Residential Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-) [Row B – Row A]: -73 Retail Commercial
Retail 5,223 SF 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF3 12
2 Source: City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code, Chapter 17.42 – Residential Use Types. 3 Source: Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022.

TABLE 3

CITY CODE VS ITE AND DOWNTOWN/TOD PARKING REQUIR

DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE P
Project Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio
Multi-Family Residential
Studio 1 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 2-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 3-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit Resident Guest Parking
Studio 0.5 sp/unit inc inc inc inc 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 1-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit inc inc inc inc 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 2-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit inc inc inc inc 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 3-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit inc inc inc inc 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit Municipal Code (Average) (85th % ile) (Average) (85th % ile) Downtown
Village Ctr & Gen Plan
No Nearby Transit No Nearby Transit Near Transit Near Transit Downtown, ITE Parking Generation (5th Ed) Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) City of Redlands City of City of Santa Clarita
TABLE 4

EMPIRICAL PARKING DEMAND RATIOS
DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Tenant & Tenant & Peak Parking Saturday Peak Ratio Ratio Spaces per DU Spaces per DU (Peak Hour) (Peak Hour) 1
580 Anton Boulevard
Apartments [a] Costa Mesa 580 Anton Blvd
250 Unit Apartments
• 5 Studio Units
• 168 1-Bedroom Units
• 77 2-Bedroom Units
Garage
440 Spaces
• Residents - 419 sp.
• Public/Guests - 21 sp.

Wednesday &
Saturday
6PM-3AM

1.28 (@ 2:00 AM) 1.24(@ 3:00 AM) 2 Main Street
Village [b] Irvine 2555 Main Street 481 Unit Apartments • 265 1-Bedroom Units
• 200 2-Bedroom Units
• 16 3-Bedroom Units Structure 1,020 Spaces
• Residents - 847 sp.
• Public/Guests - 173 sp. Wednesday &
Thursday
10PM-12AM

1.42 (@ 12:00 AM) -- 3 Paragon at Old
Town [b] Monrovia 700 S. Myrtle Avenue 163 Unit Apartments • 82 1-Bedroom Units
• 81 3-Bedroom Units
Surface
Lot, On- Street Parking
404 Spaces
• Residents - 329 sp.
• Public/Guests - 75 sp.

Wednesday &
Thursday
6PM-12AM

1.48 (@ 11:00 PM) -- 4 Trio
Apartments [b] Pasadena 44 N. Madison Avenue 304 Unit Apartments • 46 Studio Units
• 141 1-Bedroom Units
• 117 2-Bedroom Units
Surface
Lot, On- Street Parking
480 Spaces
• Residents - 450 sp.
• Public/Guests - 30 sp.

Wednesday &
Thursday
10PM-12AM

1.22 (@12:00 AM) -- 5 Adagio on the
Green [c]
Mission
Viejo
2660 Oso Parkway 256 Unit Apartments
Garage,
Surface Lot 512 Spaces• Residents - 424 sp.
• Public/Guests - 88 sp.

Wednesday &
Thursday
7PM-2AM
Saturday: 12PM-3PM, 7PM-2AM

1.45 (@12:00 AM) 0.97
(@ 2:00 PM &
3:00 PM) 6 Apex Laguna
Niguel [c]
Laguna
Niguel
27960 Cabot
Road
284 Unit Apartments
• 32 Studio Units
• 161 1-Bedroom Units
• 91 2-Bedroom Units
Garage
539 Spaces
• Residents - 461 sp.
• Public/Guests - 78 sp.

Wednesday &
Thursday
7PM-2AM
Saturday: 12PM-3PM, 7PM-2AM

1.28 (@ 2:00 AM) 1.13(@ 3:00 PM)
7 Nineteen01 [d] Santa Ana 1901 E First St 254 Unit Apartments • 123 1-Bedroom Units
• 125 2-Bedroom Units
• 6 3-Bedroom
Units
Gated
Residential Structure 559 Spaces Thursday & Saturday
12AM-11:59PM

1.354
(@12:00 AM) 1.346(@12:00 AM)
8 The Marke [d] Santa Ana 100 E MacArthur
Blvd
300 Unit Apartments
• 155 1-Bedroom Units
• 131 2-Bedroom Units
• 14 3-Bedroom Units
Gated
Residential Structure 660 Spaces• Residents - 600 sp.
• Public/Guests - 60 sp.

Thursday & Saturday
12AM-11:59PM

0.767
(@12:00 AM) 0.643
(@ 2:00 PM &
3:00 PM) 9 Core Apartments
[d][e]
Anaheim
1815 Westside
Drive
222 Unit Apartments
• 328 Bedrooms Structure 726 Spaces
Thursday, Friday &
Saturday
5PM-12AM

1.38 (@12:00 AM) 1.33(@12:00 AM)
10 Baker Block [d] Costa Mesa 125 Baker Street 240 Unit Apartments • 349 Bedrooms Structure 466 Spaces
Thursday, Friday &
Saturday
5PM-12AM

1.30 (@12:00 AM) 1.24(@12:00 AM)
11 Rize [d] Irvine 1100 Synergy
363 Unit Apartments
• 511 Bedrooms Structure 564 Spaces Tuesday & Saturday5PM-12AM

1.18 (Peak Hour N/A) 1.22(Peak Hour N/A)
12 Edgeway [f] Bellflower 9735 Oak Street 91 Unit Apartments • 52 1-Bedroom Units
• 31 2-Bedroom Units
• 8 3-Bedroom Units Structure 137 Spaces
• Residents - 129 sp.
• Guests - 8 sp.

Thursday 12AM1.28
(@12:00 AM) -- 13 Newhall
Crossings [g] Santa Clarita
22551 9th Street 47 Unit Apartments• 5 1-Bedroom Units
• 32 2-Bedroom Units
• 10 3-Bedroom Units
Structure 99 Spaces Thursday 12AM

1.27 (@12:00 AM) -- Average: 1.28 -- 85th Percentile: 1.43 -- 95th Percentile: 1.46 -- Notes: [a] Source: Counts collected by Counts Unlimited on May 2023. [b] Source: Parking Demand Analysis for the Proposed Fifth Avenue/Huntington Drive Mixed-Use Project City of Monrovia, California, prepared by LLG, Oct. 2012 [c] Source: Counts collected by LLG on December 2016.
[d] Source: Revised Parking Study for Brea Plaza Shopping Center, prepared by LSA, January 2022. [e] At the time of the surveys, 222 of the 400 units were occupied. [f] At the time of the surveys, 89 of the 91 units were occupied. [g] At the time of the surveys, 45 of the 47 units were occupied.

Comparable Site City Address Development
Summary
Parking
Facility Parking Supply Survey Period
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc TABLE 5
WEEKDAY SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1]

DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Land Use Resident Guest
Size 78 DU Total
Pkg Rate 0.25 /DU Spaces = Comparison w/
Gross 20 Spc. 32 Parking Supply
Spaces Shared 135 Spaces [2]
Number of Number of Parking Surplus
Time of Day Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)
9:00 AM 53 57 78
10:00 AM 58 62 73
11:00 AM 58 62 73
12:00 PM 68 72 63
1:00 PM 81 85 50
2:00 PM 69 73 62
3:00 PM 62 66 69
4:00 PM 68 72 63
5:00 PM 75 83 52
6:00 PM 85 96 39
7:00 PM 92 111 24
8:00 PM 94 113 22
9:00 PM 68 87 48
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020.

Existing OnStreet Demand
4 4
4 4
4 4
8 11
19 19
19 [2] There is an existing on-street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on-street parking spaces will be provided.
4 4
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Newhall Mixed-Use Project 2-5-2025.doc TABLE 6
WEEKEND SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1]

DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED-USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA
Land Use Resident Guest
Size 78 DU Total
Pkg Rate 0.25 /DU Spaces = Comparison w/
Gross 20 Spc. 32 Parking Supply
Spaces Shared 135 Spaces [2]
Number of Number of Parking Surplus
Time of Day Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)
9:00 AM 77 81 54
10:00 AM 85 89 46
11:00 AM 86 90 45
12:00 PM 87 91 44
1:00 PM 91 95 40
2:00 PM 96 100 35
3:00 PM 95 99 36
4:00 PM 95 99 36
5:00 PM 99 107 28
6:00 PM 103 115 20
7:00 PM 104 124 11
8:00 PM 111 131 4
9:00 PM 95 115 20
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] There is an existing on-street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on-street parking spaces will be provided.

Existing OnStreet Demand
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
20 20
20 8
12 LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Appendix Cover.doc

APPENDIX A

EDGEWAY AND NEWHALL CROSSINGS PARKING
COUNTS
0706
Supply Demand
Regular 110 88
Handicap 3 2
ctric Vehicle 16 12
Subtotal 129 102
Occupancy 129 102
al Percent 79%
Supply Demand
Handicap 1 1
Guest [a] 8
sing / Guest 3 3
Subtotal -- 12
Occupancy -- 12
st parking provided in alleyway to the west
ng to the north and south of the building.

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
951-268-6268
A 91321
Supply Demand
Regular 97 48
Handicap 2 0
Subtotal 99 48
Occupancy 99 48
al Percent 48%
Supply Demand
eet Parking [a] 9
Subtotal -- 9
Occupancy -- 9
ces in the public portion of the parking
ong Main Street, 9th Street, and Railroad
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
951-268-6268
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Appendix Cover.doc

APPENDIX B

EXISTING COUNTS

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
N:\4800\2244807 - Newhall Mixed-Use Project, Santa Clarita\Report\4807 Appendix Cover.doc

APPENDIX C

SHARED PARKING DEMAND

Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society | PO Box 221925, Newhall CA 91322-1925 | scvhs.org February 28, 2025
To whom it may concern:

As a longtime supporter of the goals of the City of Santa Clarita’s Downtown Newhall Specific Plan, and after careful consideration, the Board of Directors of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society (“the Board”) voted unanimously on February 24, 2025, to support the redevelopment of the area of Newhall bounded by Railroad Avenue, Market Street, Main Street, and the building at 24316 Main Street (the former location of Mac’s Pool Supply).

To that end, the Board unanimously recorded its non-opposition to the removal of the building at 24307 Railroad Avenue/22505 Market Street, commonly known as “Ye Olde Courthouse.” The building is listed as one of the City of Santa Clarita’s Historic Resources. The City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance (17.03.145 UDC) states that upon a finding that the removal of a Historic Resource is necessary to proceed with a development project consistent with and supportive of identified goals and objectives of the General Plan,
… the City Council shall direct the property owner to relocate the designated historic structure to a site within the City of Santa Clarita and approved by the City Council. Such relocation may include the assistance of the developer, the City of Santa Clarita, the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society, or other entity as appropriate. Alternatively, upon completion of appropriate environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the City Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition.

The Board suspects it would be infeasible to relocate the building, whose historical integrity was severely compromised by an unfortunate 1968 remodel. Upon review, the Board is aware that no interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse (1932-1971). Should the City deem it necessary to issue a demolition permit, the Board believes it appropriate for the City to exact an impact fee from the applicant comparable in amount to the estimated cost of relocating and restoring the building to its original historical condition, such fee revenue to be restricted to the advancement of historical preservation goals within the City of Santa Clarita.

Further, the Board urges the City to require the developer to cooperate with the City and the Historical Society to add plaques in several locations throughout the project to identify the historical uses of the property.

Alan Pollack
President, Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
[X] County Clerk [ ] State Clearinghouse
County of Los Angeles 1400 Tenth Street
12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Rm. 1007 Sacramento, CA 95815
Norwalk, CA 90650

PROJECT
NAME:

Newhall Mixed-Use Project: Master Case 24-134

PROJECT
LOCATION:
-012-
022 through -026)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:

The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Development Review (DR), and Architectural Design Review (ADR) for the redevelopment of the potentially
historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street) buildings located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project is a full-block development consisting of the demolition of the existing structures to construct a new five-story mixed-use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial floor area and ground-level parking within the building footprint. The upper levels include 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first-floor levels. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided from Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requires a CUP to increase the allowable floor area ratio. An MUP with City Council approval is required to demolish the onsite potentially historic building. The applicant is requesting an ADJ for a 20-percent reduction in the amount of shared amenity space to be provided. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR.

PROJECT
APPLICANT:

Serrano Development Group
This is to advise that the City of Santa Clarita has made the following determinations regarding the project described above:
1) The project was approved by the [] Director of Community Development [ ] Planning Commission [X] Mayor and City Council on the following date: April 22, 2025.
2) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {a}). 3) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {b}). 4) [X] An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 5) [ ] An Addendum to the Final EIR was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 6) The project [ ] WILL [X] WILL NOT have a significant impact on the environment. 7) Mitigation measures [X] WERE [ ] WERE NOT made a condition of project approval. 8) A Statement of Overriding Considerations [ ] WAS [X] WAS NOT adopted for this project.

This is to certify that the [ ] NEGATIVE DECLARATION [X] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT [ ] ADDENDUM with record of project approval is available for public review at:

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, California 91355
(661) 255-4330
Contact Person/Title: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I Signature: ________________________________________________ Master Case 24-134
Rafters Relocation request
With the loss of the building used for 50 years. Rafters and the Spanish Speaking group downstairs is in need of a new long-term home in the downtown Newhall area.

With over 500 members our goal is to continue to serve our community. Our program enhances public safety and economic growth in the Newhall community.

Relocation of the Rafters Group.

Option 1
The Rodger Dunn building
24206 Main St Newhall CA
If the City is willing to extend a long term lease for this location to Rafters.

The Rafters Group will assist in the remediation of any mold in the location. With this location Rafters would also be able to extend the addition or Spanish speaking self help groups.

The Rafters Group will recreate the downstairs with the hostorcal wood paneling and wood flooring from the old Masonic building. Thus keeping historic parts of Santa Clarita alive. Being of service to the community as a whole.

Option 2
The Senior Center location.
22900 Market St Newhall CA 91321
With the cooperation from the city with a long term lease.

Rafters will provide with city approval the dividing of the building interior so the location can accommodate Rafters with Spanish speaking groups, Veterans Center and any Art center that would benefit the cities usefulness of the property.

The interior portion of the location used for the Rafters will be finished with the historic wood paneling and flooring from the old Masonic building, if possible recreate the celing with the original trusses (rafters) from the second floor of the old masonic building OR use the old trusses to create a solar covered parking area. Giving electricity to the entire center. The rents Rafters would be paying could be used to fund activities for the veterans or art center if the city found this idea acceptable . Benefitting the community as a whole.

Option 3
With a condition from the city council for the developer to allow the removal of the roof trusses so they may be reused to recreate the entire second floor of the old masonic building as a single story structure all the wood paneling and wood floors and Rafters as it looks today.

The second part of this request is the assistance of the city to grant a long-term land lease as a location for the new building. The Rafters group would raise funds and apply for grants to complete the rebuild this historic structure.

Or the possibility of a private entity to develop this project in the future.

Possible locations
Parking lot of the senior center. 22900 Market St Newhall CA 91321 Other locations
APN 2831-019-901
APN 2827-002-028
APN 2833-014-904
APN 2827-001-902
Or any viable City property within the downtown Newhall area.

Option 4
The removal of all 1 story attached structures surrounding the original 2 story masonic building. Leaving the 2 story building alone to be moved and restored as a hostorcal building. Either to be leased and occupied by our group the Rafters. Or set up as a piece of history and used at the discretion of the City.

Location to be determined by the city with the hope of Newhall area.

We are asking at the least from the City council to make a condition to the developer for the preservation and removal of the roof trusses from the old Masonic building. Doing this during the demolition of the building will not be a hard task for a contractor. We shall provide storage of these and all other historical parts removed from the building to be used at a future date to recreate this historic dance hall seen as the current upstairs of the the old masonic building. Also grant the Rafters group a lease at one of the mentioned city property or other location suggested by the city council.

Option 5
The city council assistance in a long-term lease to be part of the senior center 22900 Market St Newhall CA 91321 or
Old Rodger Dunn building 24206 Main St Newhall CA
Shall be finished at the cities direction to accommodate the Rafters Group to fit with the cities planned usage of the property. Allowing Rafters to benefit the community as a whole.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely David Doyle
Chairman, Rafters Group.

March 17, 2025
Santa Clarita City Council
23920 Valencia Blvd #120,
Valencia, CA 91355
Support for Proposed Mixed-Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321
Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff,
I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed-use development project in Newhall. I have been a proud resident of Santa Clarita for over 36 years, and have raised 2 children in this city. I am also the manager of a business on Main Street. I am deeply invested in seeing the area grow in a way that benefits families and businesses like mine.

Newhall is an area that has always been close to my heart. It’s a place that feels like home, and I want to see it continue to thrive. The addition of 78 new apartments will provide more housing options for our growing city, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will create new opportunities for local shops, restaurants, and businesses. As a resident, this development means more convenience, with new places to shop and dine close to home.

The impact of Newhall Crossings on Old Town Newhall has been overwhelmingly positive, with new businesses opening and revitalizing the area. The increase in foot traffic has made the neighborhood more active and inviting, and I’m excited to see how this new development will continue that trend. The mix of residential and retail spaces will make the area more vibrant, creating a more walkable and connected community.

For these reasons, I fully support the project and encourage others to do the same. I believe it will have a lasting, positive impact on our community.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Serena Schaffer
28031 Ermine Place, Canyon Country, CA 91351
661-547-5278

04/14/2025
Dear Representative of the City of Santa Clarita Community, First, I am pro progress for the upcoming Newhall expansion.

However, I feel the impact without intervention to assist KHTS Radio Station will have devastating effects on the community.

I believe that between the Developer and the City’s help to mitigate the chaos of the upcoming construction, and aid in the Stations relocation to the far side of the building will ensure KHTS with its daily function and help with the regular scheduled broadcasting needs, thus ultimately saving the Stations livelihood.

The radio station is an integral part of the Santa Clarita’s informational outlet. I personally utilize the broadcast to inform others of upcoming community events. I don’t feel it unreasonable to ask for your support and intervention and help to regulate their continued success.

KHTS encompasses the pulse point of the city’slocals, this Radio Station has always had Santa Clarita community members welfare first and foremost. Having stated this, I feel it a fair and reasonable request of the aforementioned aide.

It would be devastating for all involved if they were interrupted or dismantled due to lack of broadcasting availability or help from our City of Santa Clarita members.

Respectfully,
Mary Ackerman
[email protected]
661-414-6553
DR.AAKASH AHUJA 5:28 PM (28
minutes ago)
to me, Carl
Respected City Council Members,
I am writing this letter to express my support for KHTS and its owners, Jeri SerratiGoldman and Carl Goldman.

The ownership of KHTS by Carl and Jeri has significantly enriched the Santa Clarita Valley. As widely recognized, they have transformed the community’s only local radio station into a vital platform for news, entertainment, and civic engagement. Their efforts extend far beyond broadcasting; they have been instrumental in supporting local nonprofits and spearheading initiatives such as the Michael Hoefflin Foundation for Pediatric Cancer, the Santa Clarita Coalition, and Homes for Heroes with Habitat for Humanity. Through these efforts, they have demonstrated their dedication to assisting disaster victims and underserved families, enhancing the quality of life for Santa Clarita residents.

Carl and Jeri have also organized impactful community events such as the KHTS Home & Garden Show, Emergency Expo, and advocacy trips to Sacramento, all of which foster civic engagement and strengthen our community bonds. Additionally, their tireless work with local charities and their use of KHTS to amplify non-profit initiatives have made them pillars of Santa Clarita’s civic and charitable landscape.

It has come to my attention that a developer has submitted a plan to the City Council to construct a 5-story apartment/retail complex with subterranean parking. Based on my understanding, this project’s wall will be located very close to the offices and studios of KHTS. While I recognize that such development projects may offer certain benefits to our city, I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on KHTS during the two-plus years of construction.

I respectfully request that the developer and the City Council consider placing a moratorium on blasting and coring activities between the hours of 6:00–9:00 AM, Monday through Friday, as well as a 30-minute break during lunch hours. These specific times are critical for KHTS to broadcast their highest-revenue programs. During these hours, other construction activities could still proceed without disruption.

Additionally, I would ask the developer to consider compensating KHTS for relocating their studios and offices to another part of their building that would better buffer construction noise. This would help ensure that KHTS can continue its vital operations without interruption.

While this development project may bring value to our city in the long term, it is essential to mitigate its short-term impact on KHTS. The station’s potential closure due to construction disruptions would be a significant loss for Santa Clarita’s residents and its vibrant community fabric.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Dr. Aakash Ahuja
Trustee, William S. Hart School Board
Sent from my iPhone
G-St r-L-L-ts
Aprit 7 ,2025
.

City of Santa Ctarita City Councit
RC: KHTS
Dear City Councilmembers,
As a former Santa Ctarita Man of the Year, and votunteer for dozens of our valteys non-profit, I have witnessed the criticatrote KHTS has on Santa Ctarita. Not onty have they been a vitat news source and invatuabte duringour manyemergencies, KHTS has atso assisted many dozens of our tocat non-profits and individuats in need.

I have partnered with KHTS on many non-profit projects overtheyears. I've witnessed the radio station's positive impact.

We need our radio station to continue to be an anchor in Santa Ctarita. I appeatto you to assist with their very reasonabte mitigation request to attow them to stay in business.

Thankyou in advance foryour consideration.

Sincerety,
Suite 115 ' Vatencia, cA 91355 (661) 222-gggg . Fax (661) 222-9981 www. saltcreekgrille.com
GregAmster
Proprietor, Salt Creek Gritte
24415 Town Center Drive .

From: Fred Arnold <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 5:08:15 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <jeriseratti@gm ail.com>
Cc: Fred Arnold <[email protected]>
Subject: Letter of Support for KHTS
April 16, 2025
To The Santa Clarita City Council,
I am writing in strong support of Carl Goldman, Jeri Seratti Goldman, and KHTS Radio, as they face challenges due to the construction planned next door to their radio station.

While I believe that creating new opportunities downtown is exciting and important for the continued growth of our community, I also understand the very real impact such development can have—particularly when it comes to noise, vibration, and disruption to neighboring businesses. The nature of the planned construction, with its pounding and heavy equipment, could severely hinder KHTS’s ability to operate effectively.

KHTS has been a vital part of the Santa Clarita Valley for over 30 years, going back to its early days as KBET. Long before we had access to smartphones or Google, they were the primary source for local news, emergency updates, and traffic information. During times of crisis, they were—and continue to be—a reliable voice for our city.

On a personal note, KHTS played a major role in the development of my own business and community outreach efforts. Thanks to Carl and Jeri, I was given the opportunity to host a radio show that spotlighted over 1,200 local entrepreneurs and nonprofits over nearly a decade. That platform not only helped those businesses grow, but also allowed me to give back to the community in a meaningful way. I owe much of my local success to the support and mentorship of Carl and Jeri.

KHTS is not just a business—they are a cornerstone of this community. I respectfully urge the City Council to do everything in its power to help mitigate the construction-related disruptions to KHTS. Supporting this station means supporting a lifeline of information, connection, and emergency communication for Santa Clarita residents.

Sincerely,
Fred Arnold, Owner 360 Suites SCV
Community Philanthropist
Thursday, April 10, 2025
Dear Santa Clarita City Council,
I’m writing today to express concern over the proposed Serrano development project at Market and Main Streets, and its direct impact on KHTS Radio. Before I continue, I want to acknowledge the long-standing relationship I’ve had with each of you and with the city we serve.

In my last 6 years at KHTS, I’ve either watched, attended, or edited articles on nearly all of the City Council meetings that occurred during that time. I’ve spoken to each of you personally. We’ve shared laughter, frank conversations, and the occasional glass of wine. Some of you I’ve known personally for over a decade. I mention this to remind you that your decisions affect not just businesses and properties on paper, but real people – your neighbors and fellow residents like me.

Many of us young people had the option to move elsewhere, to take positions out of state for better pay and more affordable homes. I chose to stay because I love Santa Clarita. My family is here, my career is here, and I believe in this community.

This new Mixed-Use Newhall development project presents a complex challenge, and I do not envy your position in having to debate it. But as someone working for a business directly adjacent to the proposed construction, I urge you to consider the very real consequences it will have on KHTS Radio.

The reality is that we will be at best inconvenienced, if not outright unable to operate for the entire length of the construction. Based on my experience during the Newhall Crossings construction – when noise from over 600 feet away was disruptive even indoors – I am deeply concerned about our ability to operate, given that this new project directly borders our building.

KHTS needs clear, actionable support from both the City and the developer, whether in the form of financial assistance, logistical accommodations, or help with relocation, to ensure we can continue to serve our community without shuttering.

Outside of concerns for my continuing employment, I also speak as a 28-year resident who grew up in Santa Clarita and deeply values its history. I’m saddened by how often unique historical sites have been lost to short-sighted development plans. The rushed demolition of the Bonelli Cabins at the Saugus Speedway – a famous example of architectural and cultural significance – is a reminder of what we’ve lost.

Though not a city decision, I find this example especially illustrative of some of the decisions that brought us to this meeting. In this case, I find it troubling that the process leading to the planned demolition of the Old Courthouse has not appeared transparent or consistent with the city’s standards for historical evaluation. I sincerely hope that the individuals involved acted in good faith, and I trust the City Council will examine whether proper procedures were followed. Our community deserves a decision rooted in integrity and public accountability.

Whether or not the Old Courthouse can be saved is beside the point. The issue at hand is not just preservation but process. History remains, whether buildings stand or not—but our city’s respect for its own procedures and values is what defines our legacy today.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Yours,
Jade Aubuchon
April 9, 2025
Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community
Dear City of Santa Clarita council members,
My name is Olivia, and I am writing to you to request that you please don’t disrupt business at KHTS radio as they are my weekly resource for getting all the emergency information in and around the city, especially during fire season.

In addition to getting emergency information I am an avid listener to their Senior Hour show on Wednesdays and I look forward to the show every week and the topics that I have been able to relate to and learn from.

KHTS has always been a valuable asset to the community and I know many who would be affected if they were to be taken off the air even just temporarily.

Thank you for reading.

Gino B.

Saugus, CA
Aubree Barnett 10:43 AM (4
hours ago)
to me
To the Santa Clarita City Council Members,
I am writing concerning the debated Serrano development in Newhall on Main Street. As a member of the staff at KHTS Radio, I am deeply concerned about the negative impact it will have on our business – a business that has been around for decades and has worked alongside the city of Santa Clarita for the benefit of our Hometown for years.

KHTS Radio has been a long-standing institute of news, advertisement, and support of all things Santa Clarita. We operate with a willingness to aid non-profits, Santa Clarita events, local businesses, popular radio shows, and more.

However, this new project threatens our ability to continue to serve Santa Clarita organizations, the residents, and you, the City Council. The noise levels would be intolerable and work conditions in our building and others around us on Main Street would decrease in quality, making it difficult for all businesses surrounding the project to operate at their normal rate, if at all.

The project does not have a limited projection, but with the size of it, it could take two or more years even to complete. Which means we at the radio station and all the other companies surrounding it will suffer. People will likely lose their jobs and owners will go out of business.

Main Street is already short on parking and struggles getting business during the weekdays.

This project would decrease the foot traffic even more.

Besides the concern to my employment and continuation of the radio station, and survival of surrounding businesses on Main Street, I also express sorrow over the apparent overlooking of the historical courthouse that is going to be destroyed by the making of this project. I hope the City will re-evaluate the historical significance of this building in its history of our great town and give it a fair chance at preservation.

It is unfortunate so much of this debate is on your shoulders, and I know the council will take great care in evaluating this situation and what is best for the Santa Clarita residents. As a bornand-raised Santa Clarita resident, I love this city and hope for the best for our local hometown station.

Thank you for your consideration and for taking time to read this.

Sincerely,
Aubree Barnett
--
Regards,
Aubree Barnett
KHTS Radio - Graphics Dept.
hometownstation.com
[email protected]
Santa Clarita, CA, 91321
April 11, 2025
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to you on behalf of KHTS Radio to respectfully urge the City of Santa Clarita to reconsider the proposed construction project on Main Street.

While we understand and appreciate the importance of infrastructure improvements, this particular project poses a significant challenge to our station and our ability to continue serving the community from our current location.

KHTS has been a vital part of the Santa Clarita Valley’s media landscape for decades.

We have consistently provided timely, accurate, and potentially life-saving information to residents, most notably during the recent Hughes Fire and in past emergencies such as the 1994 Northridge earthquake.

Our local news coverage, community engagement, and real-time updates are an essential resource for Santa Clarita residents.

Relocating our operations due to construction would come at a substantial financial cost—one that may be too much for us to bear without assistance. Should the City decide to proceed with the project, we respectfully request that support be provided to help KHTS mitigate the cost and impact of relocation. With the City's help, we can continue our mission uninterrupted and remain a cornerstone of the community's communication infrastructure.

We hope the City will recognize the critical role KHTS plays in public safety, local news, and community cohesion. We are open to discussing possible solutions and partnerships that would allow the project to move forward while also preserving our ability to serve the people of Santa Clarita.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Steven Barrera
KHTS Radio

4-14-25
Honorable Councilmembers,
The beauty of KHTS is that it is a community partner. It is our radio station! We only have ONE. They step up during natural disasters to give us real time info, share local traffic updates, report on local fires, carry championship high school sporting events, promote our non profits and produce community events.

Over the years, Carl and Jeri, KBET and KHTS, have been a powerful force as a business and as community leaders. In the late 90’s when Clear Channel purchased the station and left the local format to simulcast LA stations KIIS and XTRA Sports, we missed our hometown station. Several years later the Goldmans had the opportunity to bring it back, so they invested, risked and rebuilt. Now before you is a situation that can involuntarily put them out of business and silence KHTS forever.

As elected decision makers, you’ve been tasked to make sound decisions for us.

You’ve probably heard this sage advice; Never give up an old friend for a new friend, or the grade school song- make new friends but keep the old, one is silver and the other gold.

In the name of “progress”you risk the loss of a good business. Please come up with a good compromise that doesn’t put one business out so another can come in. Be supportive of both of these businesses. As a business friendly city, please accommodate both ventures fairly.

Sincerely,
Sharon Bronson
Dear Councilmembers,
I am a 50 plus year resident of the Santa Clarita Valley. Along with my neighbors, friends and former business associates find the emergency coverage on KHTS vital.

Not only has their information always been immediate and accurate, their behind-thescenes assistance for so many organizations has made them one of the most critical foundations of our valley.

It is crucial for our valley to continue to have a radio station.

Please find a better arrangement in solving the disruption 2 plus years of construction will cause on the radio station’s broadcasts.

Thanks for your attention.

Sincerely,
Monika Bucknall
[email protected]
Nancy T. Carnahan 2:42 PM (2
minutes ago)
to me
To the Santa Clarita City Council,
It was brought to my attention that construction will soon begin on a 5-story apartment/retail complex with subterranean parking 1/8 of an inch against the KHTS offices and studios.

While that's fantastic news and exciting for the city, I'm shocked that the Radio Station was not given more consideration (and guard rails) before this project was approved.

Further, why has the reasonable request to place a moratorium on blasting and coring between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m., Monday through Friday, and 30 minutes for lunch during the station's highest revenue programs fallen on deaf ears? It's pretty apparent to me that the proximity of this construction project would negatively impact a working studio.

KHTS has been a model community team player and should be included in the discussions about scheduling activities that would impede the business's operation, which is vital to the community.

This is about loyalty, courtesy, and creating a win for all.

Thank you to KHTS for years of community leadership. I'm hoping the city will work with the developer to ensure the studio is not impacted any more than it already will be once the construction is completed.

It's essential to be a good neighbor. What a terrible and disappointing position the City has put itself in.

Nancy T. Carnahan
Real Estate Broker
To the Santa Clarita City Council,
I’m writing as both a resident and a business owner in Santa Clarita to strongly support KHTS and urge the Council to help find a reasonable solution that allows the station to continue operating during the planned construction. KHTS has been part of this community for so many years—my kids grew up with them on the air. They’ve organized Sacramento and Washington lobbying trips, supported countless local events, and have always gone above and beyond for our city.

It would be devastating to even imagine Santa Clarita without our local radio station. KHTS is more than media—it’s a pillar of our community. Frankly, I believe most people here would rather keep KHTS than gain another apartment building. I hope you’ll take this into serious consideration and do what’s necessary to ensure they can stay on the air and continue serving all of us.

Sincerely,
Inessa Chavez
All American Bail Bonds
From: Peter Clancey <[email protected]>
Date: April 15, 2025 at 6:32:40 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Proposed construction
I am in favor of the developer of the downtown Newhall project to accede to the requests made by KHTS. This valley needs a local radio voice and KHTS has done a wonderful job in filling that need. I am not saying stop the project, just ensure that KHTS is able to survive the construction period.

Respectfully,
Peter Clancey

Support for KHTS FM 98.1 & AM 1220 – Our Community Station Deserves Protection and Respect
Dear Mayor Miranda and Esteemed Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the treatment of our beloved hometown radio station, KHTS FM 98.1 & AM 1220, particularly in light of recent developments involving Serrano Development Group, Inc. and their new five-story project in Old Town Newhall that is set to displace KHTS from its long-standing location.

This move represents more than just a physical relocation—it’s a potential blow to one of Santa Clarita’s most dedicated community institutions. KHTS has been a trusted voice in our valley for decades, delivering local news, emergency alerts, coverage of nonprofit events, school happenings, small business highlights, and countless community-driven programs. Their role is irreplaceable, and their roots in Old Town Newhall are both historic and meaningful.

The fact that a development project is moving forward in a way that could push out such a valued local voice, without a clear, public effort to protect or support them, is deeply troubling.

This situation gives the appearance that corporate interests are being prioritized over community interests, and that local legacy institutions like KHTS are being overlooked.

I urge the City Council to intervene, mediate, and advocate on behalf of KHTS. Whether that means assisting them in securing a comparable and visible new location, providing financial or logistical support during their transition, or reevaluating how future development affects cornerstone local businesses—something must be done to ensure KHTS is not left behind or pushed out.

Santa Clarita has always prided itself on being a close-knit, community-first city. If we truly value that identity, then we must show it in how we treat the institutions that have served and uplifted our community for so long.

Thank you for your time and for considering the very real concerns of residents who stand behind KHTS and the vital role they play in our city.

Sincerely,
Andrew Delgado
Proud Santa Clarita Resident
Support for KHTS FM 98.1 & AM 1220 – A Valued Voice in Our Community Dear Mayor and Esteemed Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing as a concerned resident and passionate supporter of local media to bring to your attention the growing concerns surrounding the treatment of our local radio station, KHTS FM

98.1 & AM 1220.

KHTS is more than just a radio station. It is a pillar of the Santa Clarita community, serving as a reliable source for local news, emergency updates, community events, and hometown stories that rarely make it to larger media outlets. Their commitment to uplifting small businesses, nonprofits, schools, and community voices is something that sets them apart in an increasingly disconnected media landscape.

KHTS has consistently gone above and beyond for Santa Clarita—broadcasting critical updates during wildfires, championing local heroes, and giving air time to issues that directly affect our families and neighborhoods. Their presence helps keep our city informed, connected, and proud.

Local media is a community lifeline, and KHTS has proven time and time again that they are committed to Santa Clarita. It’s time we show that commitment back.

Thank you for your time, your service to our city, and your attention to this matter.

Respectfully,
Gil & Margaret Delgado
Proud Resident of Santa Clarita
April 14, 2025
Dear Members of the Santa Clarita City Council,
I am writing to express the importance of maintaining a dedicated local radio station in Santa Clarita which is being threatened by the plans to construct more apartments and retails store on Main Street in Newhall. With the upcoming construction, this could put a huge strain on our business and affect how we push out our radio frequencies to the people of our community.

As our city continues to grow and thrive, the need for a trusted, centralized source of local news, emergency updates, community events, and cultural programming becomes ever more essential.

KHTS serves as a vital communication hub. In times of emergency — such as wildfires, earthquakes, or other natural disasters — real-time, localized information can make the difference between safety and tragedy. National or regional broadcasters cannot provide the same timely, specific information like we can and do.

Beyond emergencies, KHTS offers a platform for the many voices of our community — from local artists and musicians to business owners, nonprofits, and civic leaders. We promote local culture and create a deeper sense of connection among residents.

College students could gain valuable experience through internships and volunteer opportunities, developing skills in journalism, broadcasting, and public speaking.

In an era when so much media is distant and disconnected, a local voice is more important than ever.

I respectfully urge you to prioritize and support KHTS Radio if this construction project is approved.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Louie Diaz
April 14, 2025
Santa Clarita City Council, this is Tom Dierckman. With regard to construction of the 5 story building abutting the spaces occupied by our local radio station, KHTS, I respectfully request that you give careful consideration to and agree to require the developer of the 5 story building to mitigate the impact of construction on the station’s ability to broadcast quality programming as the station has requested. KHTS provides an essential service to our community, one that is widely relied upon by so many of our city’s residents. Thank you for your support of this request.

Sent from my iPhone
GENE DORIO, M.D.

Geriatric & Internal Medicine
23823 Valencia Blvd., Suite 230
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
661 254-5554
(fax) 661 254-0017
April 2, 2025
Dear City Council
I am writing on behalf of KHTS Radio in Santa Clarita to support their efforts in being a vital part of our community.

For over two decades, as co-host of The Senior Hour, our voice for older adults has resonated from the KHTS studio microphones, advising seniors on health and financial matters, as well as providing emergency information to the community during times affected by fires and earthquakes.

A proposal to build a 5-story apartment and retail complex with underground parking next to the KHTS studios is currently under review by the City Council. Unfortunately, this will impact daily broadcast operations, hindering Santa Clarita's main voice.

This will affect not only The Senior Hour but also other voices that should be heard, which unite us as a community.

Certainly, a project like this is needed in Santa Clarita, but it should not negatively impact a vital asset, driving it out of the community it serves.

Please find a viable alternative allowing KHTS to continue contributing as the heart and soul of our community.

Thank you.

Gene Dorio, M.D.

Michael R Dougherty <[email protected]> 8:01 AM (8 hours ago)
to [email protected]
Hello KHTS:

Just read the editorial about the new development in downtown Newhall.

Given all that KHTS has done, and is doing for the City of Santa Clarita, it's so sad to learn that the City is willing to sacrifice KHTS for a new development.

Having to move your studio and add soundproofing because of construction noise. Traffic and parking issues as well.

KHTS relocated to downtown Newhall at a time when the city was working to upgrade that part of town. How quickly they forget.

We support you, and wish you all the best,
Mike and Mary Dougherty
From: [email protected]
Date: April 16, 2025 at 1:55:08 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: letter
As a resident of Santa Clarita, My wife and I have been listeners of KHTS for many years. 98.1 FM - 1220 AM has always been the voice of Santa Clarita and a huge souce for local news, traffic conditions and weather and sports.

During emergencies, such as fired and such, KHTS is the local go-to for residents during evacuations, road closures and other important news.

KHTS Radio has been a huge assist getting the word out about our many non profit organizations here in the Santa Clarita Valley as well as being available for city sponsored events. Our schools also depend on KHTS for airing local high school football games.

KHTS is Santa Clarita's Hometown Station and the only local station here.

Residents of Santa Clarita have depend on it for local programing.

Michael Dowler
To the Santa Clarita City Council,
As the founder of Finally Family Homes, a nonprofit organization serving youth experiencing homelessness and those who have aged out of foster care in the Santa Clarita Valley, I want to express my strong support for KHTS and the vital role they play in our community.

KHTS has been a generous sponsor and supporter of our mission, consistently uplifting local nonprofits, small businesses, and families through their broadcasting and community engagement. Their ability to operate without disruption is crucial—not just for their survival, but for the many local organizations and residents who rely on them as a trusted voice in Santa Clarita.

While we understand the value of development, we believe reasonable accommodations must be made to preserve essential local institutions like KHTS. We respectfully urge the City Council to support a compromise that allows construction to continue while also ensuring KHTS can operate during their key broadcast hours.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Christina Dronen
Executive Director
Finally Family Homes
661-347-8502
https://finallyfamilyhomes.org
Partnering with Young Adults to Overcome Adversity and Achieve Success To the City Council of Santa Clarita;
KHTS radio has given us tremendous minute by minute updates on local Santa Clarita news for years. They have been incredible partners to me as a President of Top Entertainment, providing support by keeping the community aware of events like Summer Breeze Music Festival. KHTS role in the growth of my business has been significant. I fully support any efforts offered that would allow Carl and Jeri Goldman to continue their operation without any disruptions from the new construction. Please give this request your consideration. We need KHTS in Santa Clarita.

Thank you
Sincerely,
Terrell Edwards/ Top Entertainment
Www.terrelledwardsmusic.com
4-15-25
Support our Local Radio Station. KHTS under the leadership of Carl and Jeri have for decades been there for the Santa Clarita community.

I first met them on January 18, 1994, as we were all trying to figure out what to do after the Northridge Earthquake. The radio station was the only source of reliable information for emergency services. I began working for FEMA as a volunteer lawyer. Carl and Jeri promoted the services Santa Clarita local lawyers (there were only a hand full of us then) were doing so thousands of our neighbors could get help.

When there’s been fires and freeway closures, our local radio station, KHTS and Carl and Jeri have been there as the only resource for news. When the economy collapsed in 2008, Carl and I collaborated to do a radio show providing our neighbors with reliable information and where to find the resources to get through the economic crisis.

I was offering and continue to offer bankruptcy information and filings for people. I’ve helped thousands in our community with Carl and Jeri’s support in doing so. Carl and Jeri and their radio station, not any developer, have been there for Santa Clarita. It’s time we thank them by supporting them against the Newhall developer and their surrogates on the Santa Clarita City Council.

Thank you Carl and Jeri and KHTS.

Lou Esbin
Sent from my iPhone
From: Nancy Fairbanks <[email protected]>
Date: April 15, 2025 at 9:19:52 PM PDT
To: Ken Striplin <[email protected]>, City Council <citycouncil@santaclarita.com>, Jeri Seratti-Goldman <[email protected]>, [email protected], Frank Oviedo <foviedo@santaclarita.com> Subject: The Goldman's Noise Concern
Dear Santa Clarita Officials, Carl and Jeri,
I would first like to address the Goldmans’ concerns regarding a perceived 'backdoor deal' involving City Councilwoman Laurene Weste’s negotiation of a $750,000 fee with Serrano Development Group for the demolition of the 1931 courthouse. This matter deserves a respectful and factual discussion, as outlined below:

Legal Compliance: Weste’s actions align with California law:
• Political Reform Act of 1974 (Gov. Code § 87100 et seq.):

This prohibits officials from making decisions for personal financial gain. Weste negotiated the fee for public benefit— possibly to fund preservation or community projects—not personal gain, and no evidence suggests a conflict of interest. • Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54950 et seq.): This allows closedsession negotiations for real property or contracts, a common practice to protect the city’s position. Weste’s discussions with the developer fall within this exception.

There is no indication of legal violations or personal benefit. The $750,000 fee appears to be a strategic effort to secure public value, not an illicit deal. While moral and ethical perspectives are subjective and individual choices, transparency concerns are valid. Absent legal violations, I respectfully suggest that this issue need not remain a focal point of criticism, allowing focus to shift to the project’s direct impacts on KHTS. I also submitted an article to The Signal hoping to resolve the community's concerns.

Addressing Concerns Regarding the Newhall Mixed-Use Project and Its Impact on KHTS Radio Station
The Goldmans, as property owners and business operators, have several legal rights under California law and municipal regulations such as: the right to quiet enjoyment. Under California property law, tenants and property owners have the right to quiet enjoyment, meaning they cannot be subjected to unreasonable interference that disrupts their use of the property. Excessive construction noise that disrupts broadcasting could violate this right, especially if it exceeds municipal noise limits.

The city's noise ordinance is codified in Chapter 11.44 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, The ordinance is current through Ordinance 24-4, passed on June 25, 2024. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, residents are encouraged to contact the City Clerk’s Office at (661) 284-1405. This table summarizes the base decibels limit.

More information is accessible online at Santa Clarita Municipal Code.

Residential zone Day 65
Residential zone Night 55
Commercial and manufacturing Night 80
Commercial and manufacturing Day 70
Anyone can file complaints with the city and the Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff Station, which handles non-emergency reports like loud noises (contact number: (661) 260- 4000, as per city resources).

The city has the authority to approve development projects under its zoning laws, building codes, and general plan. The Newhall Crossings project, if compliant, can proceed, as evidenced by its listing on the planning division's website (City of Santa Clarita Planning Division - Major Development Projects).

The city must enforce its noise ordinance to protect residents and businesses from excessive noise. If construction violates the ordinance, the city can impose penalties, require mitigation, or halt activities until compliance is achieved.

The city must balance the rights of developers to build approved projects with the rights of existing businesses like KHTS. This includes considering environmental impacts, such as noise, through public hearings and environmental reviews, as part of its duty to promote public welfare.

The city must weigh the developer’s rights against those of existing businesses, ensuring impacts like noise are mitigated per environmental review processes (e.g., California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA).

Santa Clarita must ensure the project complies with zoning laws, building codes, and the noise ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 11.44).

This is information for Jerry Tolleson of the Serrano Development Group Inc. The Newhall Metrolink Station, over 300 feet from KHTS, generates typical train noise of approximately 64-70 decibels at that distance, within the city’s 70-decibel daytime limit for commercial zones. Horns may reach 91 decibels but are less frequent and directional.

Based on this information, the law appears to favor Carl and Geri Goldman, as construction noise (90-114 decibels) likely exceeds Santa Clarita’s noise ordinance (70 decibels for office buildings), potentially violating their right to quiet enjoyment under California law. Serrano Development needs to work with the City of Santa Clarita to mitigate noise impacts to avoid litigation, fines, or penalties for ordinance violations. The city must enforce its noise regulations and balance development with protecting local businesses like KHTS, potentially requiring mitigation or relocation support.

For decades, the Goldmans and KHTS have been integral to Santa Clarita’s local media landscape. Protecting their operations while advancing the Newhall Mixed-Use Project is both equitable and beneficial to our community. I respectfully urge the city and Serrano Development Group to implement noise mitigation measures or provide relocation support to ensure KHTS’s continued success. Thank you for your consideration; I trust the city will act decisively to achieve a favorable resolution for all parties.

Thank you for your consideration. I am confident the city will take appropriate steps to address these concerns and achieve a favorable outcome.

Nancy Fairbanks
Vicki Fayne <[email protected]> 1:59 PM (2
hours ago)
to info
Dear Santa Clarita City Council,
I am asking the great City Council to reconsider this apartment building which would not only affects our beloved KHTS, a historical building, and Old Downtown Newhall.

It is already a dangerous and deadly intersection for pedestrians and vehicles alike.

There isn't enough parking for all the venues that we currently have.

Please reconsider, as a homeowner in Newhall, we don't need another 78 apartments in downtown Newhall. Traffic is horrible as it is. --
Thank you,
Vicki Fayne
sA
'N) lll -(rl ilta
in ry(,) (.
't-arF
U'
o,
EI
<l <017VVO+(1
p
u)
t)a
:l- 3g
t4B
o
-'
H-"Fi 3 i
Pl5.*jr a
ii8€-P
g
=L:r *x r f: ,. <
-3
(/,cl; Y 6 A :
c (ft N
-
,u,!, :
!{A R=: 6i €t* u+ 3 AFE,A
9 E ::,1{ i
xB qF !
- -Fl I
d :la i
< lc?
T6
tsl-toto13i V:
-Tl {aoao+xI
-l
CD
o,=-@
r^l \9
It)
i,o trt :1
I t? 0)=
tJl s
&, W
e.
: tr ii$$l ilx
#
I il ^ EsFEE +#a
d
iFa$t E;-1 $
ili*FB €:*;
3 s'€:trE qtrg
g
3fF+A 3+g
B
+;€c* q:'F t
e;ir$ +ix
E53t+ f,gi
g
;.iF$i 6i; "s
3q i r $ afia
Eg$as f5* eE3d€ qq6
r5€31 fP$
9s 9; i lEA
.EaEr4 Ef$ ggEae fii$
3 A : ;: g I
$Fi$F Iq 353; 8.=
s€ a e $i figEfi fri 'F r ; +:
;sq ilF eag: q{ i?s f,:
o = * 9..: E-+€ o-g
s & fi la ;8t ei
€ rt 6 a r ia!4- E*d Id el; tf; d*.i € #
dE6' oro qit rq Eo* <-6'-r Ed' oe:t-r @ro6=
t 6 tn ao 9= ff
=z Iat t=' e+
Ut.E o]
E' @3
g-
,^o
F' 33
o.
5' x
.Tl NN
-{Nx
frI-xNx
Ti 3o
ct iri o
$
J!
n, R
c!
rr, s
ros
F. NoE
tl
.Eq
od
O) c! lr) $$
t-NoE
tl
'oaE
trogo
tlooa€
tl3o'5
od$N
ci s
tl x
ir- o=(5EEo
C)
q, =Eo
oS oE
b sf Egl 'E 6 5H E
ro Eo
E
R ;e
8 I E:
6 o_ (u rv
q Eb i g ;s E
oc
c
-(5
a
s1F
b EE \a'= Cf F
d8 ;c
o,f o(/, >Ai oD-o N ta oP ;S E H
E: 3! BE gT
Eg-.. .=: PEE E i
;;€ *
E
=E; EE
FE 0., Eo
5Eg' !f 988 6*P FEs eg
fiEg
== . .96= Ee
C ?:"E ;;
: :FE iE F. <uP;: :g
E q$i eE
E s=tt :; $ EH: E* ; € E'E eot $ E;€ EE '- O: (u X- oAg. :EF pE .t if :EE' =i E EE UI: ;E 8 FE ge_e [€
E 9E FPe Ei E
F5 Ep*P EE
3 E€ :Ai 5s
7 fE a'*',S Er
E
;P Eis 5; s
€
uq! E;=; gf E ;
F
o-E g,oi sV R € ;
Ei 'EEE is I F :
td xeE +E g E
e
.Et 5&e P[ -E a
F
E: Hf-E Q€* $ E
s
-tF
ct) c
th,ooEo
tr5o(J
.=(Jot
AEo
,:(oE
ct) vo5LGovGEEooLG
(J
5 0)oEf
'6
o) t=E
"m
ffi
ffi
ffi
(L
q!
t-
'/i NN
.n.

Good Morning Mayor Miranda and Santa Clarita City Council Members, It has been recently been brought to my attention the City is considering a plan to put a new mixed use building in the Old Town Newhall area. I love what the City has done with this part of town over the last 20 years. The library is beautiful and the new restaurants , shops and.bars in the area are a really great addition to the community. I commend you all on a job well done for the City of Santa Clarita.

I have learned there is a new mixed project the City is considering for that area. The construction of this project will potentially interfere with the operations of KHTS, one of our community's strongest partners. KHTS is our family's go-to source for Dodger games on the radio when we are in the car. KHTS, Hometown Station online is our primary source of information when we are trying to find outwhat is happening in our city. In addition, KHTS is always major supporters of events like the annual Home and Garden show, the Fourth of July Parade and many other important events that happen in our community. I know from first hand experience how generous the Goldmans have been with their time and their resources for community groups like mine.

The owners of KHTS have submitted a very reasonable list of requests to the City Council, that they would like to have the developer cover. These requests will help keep their business operational as this project gets underuay. lt is important to bring in new business opportunities to Santa Clarita, but it is just as important to be responsive to the needs to the businesses that are already here. Especially, the businesses like KHTS that have done so very much for our City!
I strongly encourage you to review the Goldman's request for KHTS and do everything possible to mitigate the negative impact the new construction will have on their business.

Respectfully,
Karen Frost
Saugus
818) 602-3625
April 8, 2025
Dear City of Santa Clarita council members:

I’m writing to you to ask that you do not build on the site where the radio station and other historic buildings are.

I have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio.

These days with all the technology transferring to streaming platforms only, (including local television), listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information on a daily basis.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.

Sincerely,
Olivia G.

Friendly Valley

Susan Gray <[email protected]> Tue, Apr 15, 10:52 PM (6 hours ago)
to info
Honorable council members:

I am writing you to consider not silencing KHTS radio station and take care of them so that they will be able to continue operation during this construction. They have been a value to this community during the earthquake along with every other incident that we have had out here.

Was there any consideration of the historical Courthouse and if that could be moved or the impact of Old Town Newhall and how this will impact the traffic and the charm of Main Street? So sorry the people of the community cannot comment on this decision.

The parking is bad enough now and with apartments in this area it will not be good.

Please take care of our beloved hometown station to make sure they do not go silent and make this an easy transition for them. Listen to what they require in order to make this work for them.

Thank you.

S.Gray a longtime resident of Santa Clarita
Sent from my iPhone
March 31, 2025
Diane and Neal Green
16120 Live Oak Springs Canyon Road
Canyon Country, CA 91387
Members of the City Council
City of Santa Clarita City Hall
23920 Valencia Blvd #120
Valencia, CA 91355
Dear Members of the City Council:

We are writing in support of KHTS, Our Hometown Station. We have been fortunate to call the Santa Clarita Valley our home for forty years, since January 1985, and business owners since 1983.

KHTS has been a vital heartbeat of the Santa Clarita Valley since its inception in June 1989, providing local and national news, a calendar of local community events, newsletters, thoughtful and intelligent, controversial current affair editorials and more importantly, KHTS has provided a lifeline to residents during times of local natural disasters and personal challenges.

One of the most unique qualities of KHTS is the intimate relationship this radio station, and their owners, Jeri Seratti-Goldman and Carl Goldman, have with members of the community. Decades of unwavering support, unsolicited support, for non-profit stakeholders, private individuals seeking assistance after suffering a tragedy, spearheading projects that enrich the safety, protection, and welfare for all citizens in this community by expanding critical resources in the Santa Clarita Valley and so much more. The history of their contributions to our community is too vast to enumerate in this short letter of support but rest assured that KHTS has set the bar high in terms of loyalty and selfless assistance to the residents of the Santa Clarita Valley.

We are strongly concerned and disheartened, on a personal and professional level, and find it unfathomable that the future of operations for KHTS is in jeopardy and urge the members of the City Council to protect this local treasure.

Respectfully,
Diane Green
Neal Green
April 3, 2025
Dr. Neal C Green
27141 Hidaway Avenue, Suite 201
Canyon Country, CA 91351
Member of the City Council
City of Santa Clarita City Hall
23920 Valencia Blvd #120
Valencia, CA 91355
Dear Members of the City Council:

I opened my dental practice in the Santa Clarita Valley in July 1983. For over forty years, I have been privileged in treating thousands of patients and provided employment for members of the community as both valued dental assistants and front office employees. Additionally, I have had the honor to give back to residents by donating my time and resources to free dental clinics for those in need that originated from within KHTS.

My relationship with our only local radio station spans decades. I have worked with KHTS to expand my exposure and reach within the Santa Clarita Valley to increase my new patient flow. Their expertise and guidance has been unmatched in both visibility and positive results.

KHTS is an integral and irreplaceable component in the strength of the foundation of this community and I find it an unsettling sign of the times that local leaders are not working to support KHTS and their continued service to the Santa Clarita Valley.

Respectfully,
Dr. Neal C Green
4-15-25
Dear Santa Clarita City Council,
My name is Dr. Harleen Grewal, and I am writing to express my support for allowing KHTS to continue broadcasting during the construction of the new five-story development next to their building.

While I fully support the project and the positive growth it brings to our city, I respectfully ask that the developer accommodate KHTS's request for a moratorium on blasting and coring between 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM on weekdays and a short break during lunchtime.

These are critical hours for their highest-revenue programming, which serves an important role in our community.

Additionally, I support their request to have the developer cover the cost of relocating their studios and offices to the quieter side of the building. This seems like a fair and reasonable compromise that supports both progress and a valued local business.

Sincerely,
Dr. Harleen Grewal
Sent from my iPhone
Santa Clarita Grocery
FED TAX ID#: 46-386-7801
21176 Centre Pointe Parkway, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, CA 91350 Tel 661-425-7575 April 5, 2025
Santa Clarita City Council
23920 Valencia Blvd., #120
Valencia, CA 91355
RE: Impact of Construction Near KHTS Radio Station
Dear Santa Clarita City Council,
I hope this letter finds you well. My name is Bradley Grose, and I am the Executive Director of Santa Clarita Grocery Food Bank. As we celebrate our 7th year of serving our community, we are committed to alleviating food insecurity in our area.

What many may not realize is that, beyond the groceries we provide, much of our day-to-day operations rely on a small but dedicated team of volunteers. This includes the staff at KHTS, who generously donate their time to help us with vital services such as website management, social media outreach, and bookkeeping. Additionally, KHTS acts as a key sponsor for our food drives and provides crucial backup storage space behind their radio station.

It has come to our attention that a new development is planned on Main Street, directly adjacent to the KHTS building. Given the nature of the construction, which involves extensive digging for two levels of parking just 15 feet from the KHTS walls, we are deeply concerned about the potential impact on both KHTS's operations and, by extension, the services we are able to offer through our food bank.

As a long-time listener of KHTS and a dedicated member of this community, I am at a loss as to how we will be able to maintain our services if KHTS is temporarily unable to operate due to the construction. We rely on their support for everything from outreach to storage, and this disruption would significantly hinder our ability to continue our mission of helping those in need.

We would greatly appreciate any guidance or assistance the City can provide in navigating this situation and finding a solution that ensures the continued success of both KHTS and the Santa Clarita Grocery Food Bank.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. We look forward to your support as we work together to serve our community.

Sincerely,
Bradley Grose
Founder / Executive Director
Santa Clarita Grocery Foodbank
Michael Guinan <[email protected]> 3:08 AM (2 hours ago)
to info
The radio station is of value to the community. You need the radio station during emergency like the 1994 earthquake. Also when there are wild fires or major problems on the freeways to let the citizens know how to get around the accident Please reass the choices you are doing the city. A radio station is good for everyone. This is the wrong project for the city.

Michael Guinan
I have lived here since 1974
Jerry Hahn <[email protected]> Tue, Apr 15, 5:11 PM (12 hours ago)
to info
Work it out. Common sence.. In the words of Frank Lottabucks: "Why can't we all get along"

BE KIND. Everyone you know or meet is
fighting a battle you know nothing about.

April 2, 2025
Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community
Dear City of Santa Clarita council members:

I’m writing to you today to ask that you please reconsider the removal/relocation of KHTS Radio that may disrupt business or take them off the air.

I have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio.

These days with all the informational technology transferring to streaming platforms only, including local television, listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.

Sincerely,
Debby K.

Saugus, CA
I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to express my wholehearted support for KHTS 1220 and to acknowledge the invaluable contributions the station has made to our community over years.

KHTS 1220 has consistently provided a platform for local voices, fostering a sense of connection and belonging among residents. The station's commitment to covering local news, events, and issues keeps us informed and engaged in matters that affect our lives. The radio station programming not only entertains but also educates and empowers listeners, creating an informed community that is ready to take action.

Moreover, I would like to highlight how KHTS has supported local initiatives and organizations.

Whether it's promoting local businesses, featuring non-profits, or hosting community events, the station has played a significant role in strengthening our local economy and enhancing our community spirit. The generosity of the station's team in giving airtime and resources facilitates connections that contribute to our collective well-being.

As someone who deeply appreciates KHTS's impact on our community, I also want to express my gratitude for the support you have shown me personally. Their willingness to share my story and provide a platform for my endeavors has made a profound difference in my journey as a man, business owner, and community leader. It is this kind of support that empowers individuals to strive for their goals, knowing that they have a voice and a community behind them.

Thank you for all that you do at KHTS 1220. I wholeheartedly endorse your continued efforts in serving our community and encourage others to recognize and support the incredible work being done at the station.

Sincerely,
Taylor Kellstrom
Kellstrom Real Estate Group

April 7,2025 ''
Santa Clarita City Council, '
I have been a resident of Santa Clarita since 1976. I am currently in Sand Canyon and have lived their since 1985. I had the pleasure meeting the Goldman's that s€rme year. Their radio station has been instrumental in keeping me informed about the news/local news. Besides myself I have numerous friends that listen to this station. Our radio station has been critical during our 1994 earthquake, many fires and floods I've survived over the decades. I was also part of the original team that helped form the Michael Hoefflin Foundation. The Goldman's and Hoefflin's were anchors in getting that started. The radio station has been very generous and helpful with otn many local non-profits. The station not only donates and gives free air time for promoting non-profits; the Goldman's also physically help where they can.

It would be a tragedy for Santa Clarita to no longer have a radio station that has been part of our community fof many years. Surely you can find a solution.

Sincerely,
A*^-'t"-A)
15445 Saddleback Road
Santa Clarita CA 91387
RJK <[email protected]> Tue, Apr 15, 5:55 PM (11
hours ago)
to [email protected]
Ive been reading of the proposed construction next door to KHTS radio and the negative affect it will be to
broadcasting due to the noise which cant easily be
mitigated.

Some solutions to move the studio to the far side of the building seems reasonable as well as proposals to halt
construction during early morning hours. Serrano
Developers should cover the cost of relocating the studio and agree to the silent hours of construction
The necessity of maintaining KHTS as a valuable addition and resource to Santa Clarita must be continued. A
compromise has been suggested by KHTS which is a
minor expense for the developer, compared to the major
cost of construction by Serrano Development.

I implore the City Council of SCV not to silence KHTS
Robert Kogen
From: RJK <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Construction near KHTS radio
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: Santa Clarita Valley City Council
Ive been reading of the proposed construction next door to KHTS radio and the negative affect it will be to
broadcasting due to the noise which cant easily be
mitigated.

Some solutions to move the studio to the far side of the building seems reasonable as well as proposals to halt
construction during early morning hours. Serrano
Developers should cover the cost of relocating the studio and agree to the silent hours of construction
The necessity of maintaining KHTS as a valuable addition and resource to Santa Clarita must be continued. A
compromise has been suggested by KHTS which is a
minor expense for the developer, compared to the major
cost of construction by Serrano Development.

I implore the City Council of SCV not to silence KHTS
Robert Kogen
April 10, 2025
Dear City of Santa Clarita council members:

As only a 15 year resident of Santa Clarita, I would like to request that you do not tear down the historic buildings in OTN to build the new apartments and parking structure, that would disrupt business at KHTS radio.

I discovered KHTS while on a run on Soledad Canyon Road back in 2012. I saw their neon sign and tuned into AM 1220 as soon as I got home. I discovered “The Cat Doctor” and “Cinema Vet” because of the ads ran on KHTS and have been taking my pets to them ever since. Advertising does work!
I also find out about all the local events from them such as the free Concerts In The Park, local races, and the yearly Saugus Boutique just to name a few.

Also, KHTS was (and still is) my first employer since moving to Santa Clarita.

Please reconsider building in that historic location.

Thank you!
~ Lori Kozik
Canyon Country, CA
Kim Kurowski
22164 Barbacoa Dr
Santa Clarita, CA 91350
Dear Honorable Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing as a concerned and engaged member of the community for over 40 years to express my disappointment and confusion regarding the treatment of KHTS and their current position on Main St. As a business and community presence before 1994, KHTS has not only provided consistent support and service to Santa Clarita but has also played a vital role during times of crisis- most notably, during the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, when they were the only local message service able to maintain communication for our area.

It is disheartening to learn that, despite their longstanding contributions and support of this city. KHTS is receiving little to no assistance in dealing with developers who appear unwilling to work with them. A business that has stood by this community for decades, through growth and hardship alike, should not be left behind or pushed aside, especially when development interests take center stage.

I urge the Council to revisit this issue and find a way to support KHTS in maintaining their place in the community they have served so loyally. Collaboration between developers, city officials, and community businesses should be a cornerstone of out city's growth- not a casualty of it.

Thank you for your time and continued service to our wonderful City.

Sincerely,
Kim Kurowski

April 12, 2025
To the Santa Clarita City Council,
KHTS has been a staple in our community that has supported small businesses, and citizens of Santa Clarita.

I myself have a small business. KHTS has been integral in helping me network within my community. I wouldn’t have been able to grow and reach the number of people I was able to reach and support without the support of this Radio Station. At this time, we really need to support them. The development that is proposed is going to have negative ramifications to their ability to continue to do what they do. That is going to result in business owners and the citizens of Santa Clarita, losing a huge asset that our community needs. Well, gentrification and development is important to the continued growth of the community, we must make these decisions without harming businesses that gives so much to the community. Please help KHTS get through this development phase and get the support.

They need to continue doing what they do. This way they’ll continue to give back to Santa Clarita, the community, and the small businesses that make this community thrive.

Thank you for supporting the gems that make our community great.

Dr. Megan LeCornu
Sent from my iPhone
From: "M. J. Lee" <[email protected]>
Date: April 15, 2025 at 5:08:20 PM PDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Proposed Development at Market and Railroad
TO: Santa Clarita City Council
I am writing to state my opposition to the proposed 5-story development at Market Street and Railroad Avenue. My concerns are:
1) 5-stories is too high for the area.
2) The impact on local businesses, especially KHTS - Santa Clarita - Hometownstation, will be devastating. The developer refuses to offset the cost of their internal move. If the project is approved the City should pay that or work with the developer to offset the cost. This local radio station is far too valuable to the community to force them into silence.
3) Parking is already a huge problem. So much so that I avoid Old Town Newhall whenever possible.
4) Closing a lane on Railroad Avenue for the duration of construction is not acceptable.

It's too congested as it is.
5) Destroying the historic courthouse is not acceptable. There must be an alternative to destruction.
6) Given the unscrupulous backroom deals by Laurene Weste, that alone, should render this project not qualified for approval.

Thank you,
M. J. Lee
04/16/2025
To the Santa Clarita City Council,
My name is Sophia Lesseos, and I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the potential impact of the Serrano Development Group’s proposed construction project adjacent to KHTS Radio in Old Town Newhall.

I’ve been a journalist for over six years and have seen firsthand the vital role that local news plays in building strong, informed, and connected communities. KHTS Radio is a shining example of that.

I began my journey with the station as an intern back in 2019, and today, I am proud to serve as a News Reporter. This station is more than just a job to me, it’s a place where I’ve grown, and more importantly, a platform that brings real, meaningful value to Santa Clarita.

KHTS is a cornerstone of this community. Whether it’s breaking news, emergency updates, traffic and weather alerts, or highlighting the people and events that make Santa Clarita special, this station is always there. I’ve witnessed the incredible impact local news coverage has during fires, floods, or even just when promoting a community fundraiser. That connection, that trust, is something you can’t manufacture. It’s earned through years of consistency, credibility, and care.

The current development proposal puts that all at risk. With construction scheduled to take place less than an inch from our building, the station faces serious operational challenges, especially during critical live broadcasting hours.

We are not asking for the project to be stopped, but simply to be done responsibly. Our requests, to pause drilling and blasting from 6:00 to 9:00 a.m. and for 30 minutes during lunch on weekdays, and for the developer to cover the cost of relocating our studios within our building, are more than reasonable, especially considering the scale and impact of the construction.

The City Council should carefully consider the consequences this development will have on a business that has served the Santa Clarita community for over 30 years. KHTS has been there for residents through every major moment, good and bad, offering critical information, comfort, and a sense of community. Silencing that voice, even temporarily, would be a disservice to the people who rely on it every single day.

KHTS is doing its part to adapt. We’ve planned soundproofing, moving our studios, and working around the challenges of a two-year construction timeline. We’re simply asking for the same consideration and support to ensure that this essential local voice isn’t silenced in the name of development.

I respectfully urge the City Council to take these concerns seriously. Development can and should coexist with preservation and community support.

Please help us continue to serve Santa Clarita without interruption.

Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration.

Sincerely,
Sophia Lesseos
News Reporter, KHTS Radio
Dear City Councilmembers,
Re: Mixed-use Development in the Heart of Historic Newhall As a former Santa Clarita Valley resident of 30 years and executive director with Providence Holy Cross Foundation, I have personally experienced the vital impact KHTS radio has had in Santa Clarita for decades. They are the only on-the-spot disaster information resource during fires and other SCV area catastrophes, as well as, the best source for local news, traffic and activities. In addition, KHTS has provided countless hours of free advertising for numerous local nonprofits including Providence Holy Cross Medical Center.

Jeri Seratti Goldman was instrumental in co-leading many significant fundraising drives which included the new hospital Tower, NICU, Cancer Center and many other projects.

It is crucial for our valley to continue to have a radio station.

Please find a viable compromise in solving the disruption that two plus years of construction will cause on the radio station’s broadcasts.

Thank you for your consideration.

Regards,
S. Brigette Loden
[email protected]
Dear City Councilmembers,
Re: Mixed-use Development on Main Street in Old Town Newhall As a former Santa Clarita resident, the emergency coverage on KHTS was vital. Not only has their information always been immediate and accurate, their behind-the-scenes assistance for so many organizations has made them one of the critical foundations of our valley.

Their continued services are critical to the health of SCV.

Please find a reasonable concession in solving the disruption 2 plus years of construction will cause on the radio station’s broadcasts.

Thanks for your attention.

Regards,
Jay Loden
[email protected]
04/04/2025
Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community
Dear City of Santa Clarita council members:

I’m writing to you to ask that you do not build on the site where the radio station and other historic buildings are.

I have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio.

These days with all the informational technology transferring to streaming platforms only, (including local television), listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information on a daily basis.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.

Sincerely,
Kathy M.

Canyon Country, CA

April 8, 2025
City of Santa Clarita
Attn: City Councilmembers
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
RE: KHTS AM 1220 – Request for Mitigation during Construction Dear City Councilmembers,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this letter of support.

As a former Santa Clarita Valley Man of the Year, and a volunteer for dozens of non-profit organizations since 1999, I have witnessed firsthand the critical role that KHTS has played in serving our community. Not only has the station been a vital news source providing real-time, invaluable updates throughout our many emergencies, but KHTS has also assisted many dozens of our local non-profit organizations and individuals in need.

I have participated in every one of the KHTS Sacramento Bus Trip events, as well as several of the KHTS organized Washington DC trips on behalf of our community, all of which have had an undeniable and positive impact on our community. I believe we need our local radio station, KHTS, to continue serving our community as they have for decades, and I respectfully request that you assist with the very reasonable mitigation request by KHTS, to allow them to stay in business during construction and beyond.

Thank you for your time, consideration and kindness.

Sincerely,
(661) 510-5333 (m)
[email protected]
F. c!
tf) NNa
tl
E.
.;
od
F- c{ N
(oN(f)Na
tl
'ooE
od6
tl co
od
tl3
.g
od\fNNs:5
(EE
0i :
(EEo
C)
'E0Eq) f
\
\>
,i $sss
gE
sxi ss*t :E!$
a sE;tt *i€t
E$r€i{$gsr
E-g*E€ggsE
*s-l*:;t--
iFE$gsiE$* F ig$3 E $IE$ g i i*gt ;Es s
EIi$iFiFtI
gE$€tEE$iE
E E*FE;, $SE* :'frisFg$=$*
ai*xsgtEggg-T;g
ggSttglss:Isl*i[*
no
q!
l() NoNNEo
+:oE
'=
EN
vo, CA\ ovaa
a=
tso EV
vd
LCOEo7
dr f n
oT, oo
=oEP
@FTY
nEoq
(!E
o)
e)oJL
(!oVoEEooL
(! o
U) FIY
(!E
/q
.m
ffi rft
tr& I
(o
Y?
F-
|r) NN
.i-
Phone: 661-259-9444 email: [email protected] www.MySCVCOA.org DBA: Meals on Wheels Santa Clarita Valley, Meals on Wheels Antelope Valley SCV Senior Center at BellaVida
Independence  Dignity  Quality of Life
27180 Golden Valley Road
Santa Clarita, CA 91350
April 3, 2025
Dear Friends,
On behalf of the SCV Senior Center, we want to express our support for KHTS and their efforts to continue programming during building construction adjacent to their studio.

KHTS plays a critical role in our community and the combination of daily news coverage for the Santa Clarita Valley and their radio broadcasts are vital. Each week, the Senior Hour airs on KHTS and plays a significant role in sharing information that Seniors need and want.

KHTS also supports the non-profit community by publicizing events and activities throughout the year. We need KHTS’s programming to continue without interruption and anything that can be done in terms of this construction project – should be done.

We appreciate this opportunity to share our support for KHTS and its future.

Sincerely,
Kevin MacDonald
Chief Executive Officer
Barb Messina <[email protected]> 6:53 AM (43
minutes ago)
to Info
Dear Santa Clarita City Council:

I am writing today to encourage you to make the right decision and authorize the relocation of KHTS Radio AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE or, at the very least, adhere to their modest requests.

It is NOT too much to ask. It would be a SMART decision. Don't let the citizens of Santa Clarita down!
April 14, 2025
To whom It May Concern,
I have lived in Sand Canyon for over thirty years and have depended on HOMETOWNSTATION for my daily commute, for community activities and for trusted information about devastating events; our 1993 earthquake, our fires, traffic accidents, the list goes on. They have always been there for myself, my family and most of all our growing community. When power was lost, we all would have been in the dark, had it not have been for HOMETOWNSTATION. Let’s keep the light on.

Cathy Miller
sN
N) !(n
N)
m##x
ffi
3 o. no
q_3o=
o
9)=og
CL 3
q,no
!,a-oo(o3
g. oo3v Iogo
tt3o
:' Fl.

JZ
-r Yo o' oa 1 P=
I aO x w=
=.
o!4 F' +fn
J a6 .01 :-
: g AXE'r 6 o =?=o
=
(,l -J Pt- lo
ox
bvn3V
e9 =F s; ;E ER' 2'3 la ftH fii 5a Hfi +."" qI Pd (o! o-:4 iq eE gi dE :; gd q^=
aq 6= e9 i= =F 5: d.= a;-- ;=
='=. 30 oo '>'B- He 51 #g 3q fi€ gfl E$ sE '*s \Y-J)AtA -'= == eg Es -t';
o; +? U3
=il Eg =6 60 dn 6-:
=ry *a i6=- +g
o
-
f -':t Hi ; :fi 3E ; 3q ,3'z E or E Q il ='(!)
=s
4 J q) 6'=' o o :t
=U) o -P :* s' 8Q o.t = =g
' F'u
+
To 3
=F : $ =- 5cl o=. o
ir ;; *3 80" .E 3E
=; i qq
=d u 6'<
=.: = -rT €E ) i+ x 5 :d { € tp P € E8- o ^=.o' f A !l^. AP 5 * 8'd r/,4. oq o qd
5 C +A o - JX 6' d. 6'=
^iE3 \v At
il1il P€1 €=.:< o5r 1^P /\T='
+-l(o l@o wtao
;lEf Yoo- :5c a@g 8.Pg
E
E: 8; Ed Aa 6c dg od E tP c o
\. J J -xila 26 cD g <6'o X+ J TJ -
=(/) ir- 1A c) Uta g =5
F a'o)
Ai Yi 1^ d)vq E8 ; s; E +H-.
= )Y-O e ig s \y 49
-l o Cn4=. S ui=. Y 9 ='u' A=' o a= O If =6oil ca Y o-< = -\9 I Pq'
=
(DO g ^J5s.
d Eff -='
=
a=j. Y. ii5
=
-@
6' d€ ul f.o d qr
-' o" o't
=6;o- ii'
R
o=IJo-3 oEAJEq(o o) of o- oo- u, oc 'oEOE
JVo-= a5' o(o
o
ag8sr* a. J
=oAE
o
oaX
6'= ti' YtA
=
dbo
qP
6-R o
o_
@-l
At
t,
J
xxo
-c
o" ao-a
o)o5
ir. of+o+f@o
=. o=Ul
A) +o
;a
o3:ao:c
'_:? xtl s
N)
N)
OJ s
eoo{
tl Faoa
tl
Ao=o=od
tl o3N5@(tl
1\)
(tl
(o
Ctl s
Po

9. 3
rt a
:n@N)
o) A
cuo
N)
(tl
(oql 5
€o;-N
N) o
N) (rl
0) @
i$
N)
N
NN
coE6
c) o
(!E
U) cE
.9.-L
ti tI.J
ca oA- CUCI) L
oai$ T { 1\ 4V '- NO ..Y Co q A L
>E 6 TJ
O
ft8 - 3
E
rb t lS h
s;z ss$
sq) (o(o(oN@@O) t€NoE
tlc
'6
ods
O) (o(o(oN€
ff
c!oE
tl
'4,
IDEEo€E
-ee
o) o€
ilB
.q€vNNs
tl*(\' EEoiJE
ut i3
f;
lR\ v
uj cErn
,x
roN
N-
-q) '!L!
{p
Os
.JXFXc5
v3
N.CP qi E 6 [o € g$ E P -g R F Eg # E: ] I E: q gE
L P n
- @ G'.= o- '- y6
a 2 u,' q EE g E d.g * EF E EE B frE "'t trP L oc
. E I a 9 .E'= F Fo E 5F
E E;. fi !t E $sgfi *P * g:Bi +f
-Jar -c i6 -a q'=
Eg ;.EE E €E ri Hgl ?x ;E
;E g:; E E 5: g"= HI; E# €e $e F6s EE EE f! NE *H: ::qJ3 iE EH Ei .aEi ;; f;; gE EE€ gE ig 5E 8-Es Sb ;e
Ei F= f .E E# aE HE i6
E€ ;€e :H EE
E
It *iE eE Ege
F E EP €?* €E €i: H €E ET FEI i€ FiE E
A *
=:.
;;e ri !i;
E
A; : nH f H: !5 EjsH; eE E dE =ib E5 s i ;; EE: EE EA; t P€3 eEeiI:;;E:€E F
flE EeEti*cgqifiEH g
€
T€ ; ;E : IE- Ei:EE g-.E; E -:

Eg ; s; ,E EH ;Et i; EfiF i g i; ,q lq'E € E; *€ r:si gt;gei:rsn*frE#Hsi; .9e (t, FIv
AEoqGE
c,) @oxLoaVoE
!tooL
fit o

U) FIYE
"m
#*;k&*
*
ffi w&
o_f
F* NNv
Greg Moser
Retired Owner, Consumers Furniture Gallery
April 08, 2025
To the Honorable Members of the City Council,
My name is Greg Moser, retired owner of Consumers Furniture Gallery, and I've had the pleasure of knowing Carl and Jeri Goldman, owners of KHTS, for over 30 years. KHTS has been an invaluable part of both my business and our greater Santa Clarita community. Their radio and website advertising were instrumental in helping us grow and connect with local residents, and their unwavering commitment to local news and support has made a lasting impact on this city.

For that reason, I respectfully ask the Council to consider placing a moratorium on blasting and coring between the hours of 6:00 AM-9:00 AM, Monday through Friday, as well as a 30-minute break during the lunch hour. Additionally, I encourage you to explore the possibility of compensating KHTS to relocate their studio and offices to the opposite side of their building to help mitigate the construction noise. These measures would go a long way in preserving the station's ability to serve the community without interruption.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Greg Moser
Retired Owner, Consumers Furniture Gallery

April 15, 2025
To the Honorable Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I’m writing in support of KHTS and their request for reasonable accommodations during the construction of the proposed project adjacent to their studio. KHTS has long been a vital part of Santa Clarita, providing trusted local news, emergency updates, and a consistent voice that connects and informs our community. Their morning broadcasts are especially important to many of us who rely on timely and accurate information.

Having worked in the nonprofit sector for over 20 years, I’ve seen firsthand how KHTS supports local organizations, amplifies community voices, and helps drive awareness and action. The loss of their ability to operate effectively during peak hours would be a loss for the entire valley. I respectfully urge the City Council and the developer to work collaboratively with KHTS to ensure they can continue to serve the community during the construction period.

Sincerely,
Matthew Nelson
Santa Clarita Resident
'Jerrynewbold' via Info Tue, Apr 15, 8:19 PM (13
hours ago)
to info
Please force the construction crews to work around the hours requested by KHTS.

Please have them pay for their move. Or better yet, the city council should approve funds to help them move. I was a Deputy Sheriff at Santa Clarita Station for 16 years and always thought this radio station was fair and unbiased toward law enforcement.

Not always the case with the other news in print.

The editorials and opinion sections are my favorites to read.

I hope this construction doesn’t negatively impact KHTS where they can no longer serve this community. I remember when the hi-chick curve , old San Fernando rd, was straightened and we lost our beloved burger joint. Don’t let this happen again.

Jerry a Newbold
Sent from my iPad
April 15, 2025
Santa Clarita City Council:

As a longtime resident of Santa Clarita I have appreciated the value and community outreach that KHTS has provided. As a lifetime member of the radio industry I know how critical the morning drive revenue is to a station’s survival.

I would hope that City Council would seriously consider withholding any construction that would cause any disruption in KHTS’ ability to produce and air programming during this time period.

Respectfully, Nick Nickson
Sent from my iPhone
KHTS has been our primary support for this community since they started broadcasting here. I have been here during many emergencies, at least two of them major. Why the city would hinder them in anyway is beyond me.

Greg Nutter, former Santa Clarita Man of the Year
Sent from my iPhone
P.O. Box 801604 | Santa Clarita, CA 91380
661.360.1500
www.fyifosteryouth.org
April 14, 2025
Santa Clarita City Councilmembers
Santa Clarita City Hall
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear Honorable Members of the City Council:

I am writing in support of our local radio station, KHTS. Fostering Youth Independence (FYI) began a strong partnership with KHTS in 2017, when we were first interviewed about our organization on one of their programs. Since then, I have been invited back to speak many times, and these opportunities have raised community awareness about the challenges faced by our local foster youth and the ways we can all help. KHTS has also published countless press releases about FYI and provides daily free advertising about our mission.

I respectfully ask that the Council consider the requested accommodations for the studio so they can continue to do their good work in the community while the construction project is underway.

Thank you for your consideration.

Warm regards,
Carolyn Olsen
Executive Director/Co-Founder
4-15-25
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,
We respectfully urge the City of Santa Clarita to support KHTS in their request to mitigate the significant disruptions expected from the Serrano Development Group project. Specifically, we ask that the City require the developer to curtail blasting, drilling, and coring between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. Monday through Friday, as well as for 30 minutes during lunch each day. Additionally, the developer should be held responsible for all costs associated with the relocation and soundproofing of the KHTS studios to ensure the station can continue its essential operations without disruption.

We are also deeply concerned about the lack of transparency surrounding the agreement between Serrano Development Group and Councilwoman Laurene Weste, which was reportedly conducted behind closed doors and outside of a public forum— depriving the community of the opportunity to provide input or raise concerns. Of particular concern is that the anticipated project includes the demolition of the historic courthouse building currently housing KHTS, a decision made without public discussion or community engagement. I respectfully request that the Council act in the interest of transparency, local business protection, and public trust.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Richard and Charmin Ortega

OWEN, PATTERSON & OWEN LLP
GREGORY J. OWEN*
SUSAN A. OWEN*
*Professional Corporation
Tel: 661.799.3899
Fax: 661.799.2774
www.opolaw.com
[email protected]
Attorneys at Law
23822 West Valencia Boulevard, Suite 303
Valencia, California 91355
TAMIKO B. HERRON
J. CODY PATTERSON+
BEAU M. GOODRICK++
+Also licensed in Utah
++Also licensed in the
District of Columbia
4/2/2025
Santa Clarita Valley City Council
23920 Valencia Blvd, 1st Floor
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Subject: Support for KHTS Radio and Its Role in Bettering Our Community Dear Members of the Santa Clarita Valley City Council,
We, OPO Law Injury Lawyers, are writing as long-standing Santa Clarita business and community members, to express our strong support for KHTS Radio. KHTS has been an invaluable resource for businesses, nonprofits, and residents, providing a trusted voice in local news, emergency updates, and community engagement. We ask for your continued recognition of KHTS as an essential pillar of Santa Clarita Valley.

As a law firm that has been serving this community for decades, OPO Law has relied on KHTS as a critical partner in reaching those in need of our services. The station's reach and credibility have significantly impacted our business, helping us connect with clients and establish ourselves as a trusted legal resource. Their ability to deliver important information to residents has been instrumental in our firm's success, and we value their ongoing contributions to the local economy and public awareness.

Thank you for your time and consideration. We appreciate your commitment to our community and look forward to your continued support of KHTS.

Sincerely,
Joseph P. Ancewicz
Office Manager of Owen, Patterson & Owen LLP
661-799-3899
[email protected]
April 7, 2025
Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community
Dear City of Santa Clarita council members:

I’m writing to you today to ask that you please reconsider the removal/relocation of KHTS Radio that may disrupt business or take them off the air.

I have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio.

These days with all the internet news transferring to streaming platforms only, including local television, listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.

Sincerely,
Stephen P.

Saugus, CA
To Whom It May Concern,
I would like to express to you how vital it is that the City give every consideration to KHTS during the construction of the mixed-use project at the corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall. Although we support the project, along with the Goldmans and KHTS, there may be some aspects of the construction that will be detrimental to the radio station.

My family, the Parrs, and my company, A V Party Rentals, have been associated with Jeri and Carl Goldman for over 30 years. The Goldmans and KHTS have been an asset to this community by highlighting and participating in community events and promoting not only local businesses, but also hundreds of non-profit organizations. For several months in early 1994, KHTS (then KBET) was the eyes and ears of Santa Clarita immediately following the Northridge Earthquake. Personally, KHTS has helped my business for decades, and we have teamed up for many community events over the years.

Please, when approving the project at Main & Market, give KHTS the consideration it deserves due to its exceptionally close proximity.

Sincerely,
Rusty Parr, President
A V Party Rentals
4-16-25
Dear Carl,
I sent a letter directly to the City Council members expressing our gratitude for the services that you and Jeri have provided to the citizens of Santa Clarita. Lynn and I have had the pleasure of working with you on many committees helping our community for the last 25 years.

As a long time resident, we feel very strong that our local radio station continues to provide our local citizens with community updates and emergency information which has been extremely helpful and necessary.

It is essential that there is a fair solution to allow KHTS to continue to broadcast during the upcoming construction next to their current facility.

Thank you,
Janice France Pettit
Sent from my iPhone
Stephen Petzold 3:21 AM (4
hours ago)
to citycouncil, City, bcc: me
Dear City Council,
I support the effort of KHTS and its owners Carl and Jeri Goldman to secure compensation for the extreme hardship imposed upon them due to the proposed development by Serrano Development.

Certainly, most of you are aware of the massive subsidies made to the auto body shops, Serrano, and Laemmle as an incentive to encourage development in downtown Newhall. I still have memories of your assistance in compensating a tattoo shop next to the Newhall library. As I remember you made an extremely generous to purchase Roger Dunn golf shop to relocate SCVTV to downtown Newhall.

We still remember your assistance in securing a new location for the Santa Clarita Soccer Facility when disgruntled neighbors who had purchased property next to it I am puzzled why you seem to be reluctant to respond to the request of KHTS to provide a plan for financial assistance from the developer for a project that threatens the future of a beloved and vital community media outlet.

Certainly, there is precedent for you to use the power and influence of your local agency to assist the Goldman’s and KHTS find a reasonable solution to the situation at hand.

I urge you to mediate and use your power to keep KHTS in business, providing valuable information to the SCV for years ahead.

Rest assured that we are watching from Douglas County, GA as we still own real estate in Santa Clarita and remain very concerned about its future.

Regards to All,
Steve Petzold
Open Government Advocate
Civil Rights Activist
Concerned Citizen
661-609-1739 Cell

April 15, 2025
To the Santa Clarita City Council,
As a local healthcare provider and business owner, I strongly support KHTS in their efforts to continue broadcasting during nearby construction. Their request for a brief morning moratorium and relocation support is reasonable and essential to preserve a vital community voice during peak hours. I urge the City Council to ensure that KHTS can continue serving Santa Clarita without disruption.

Respectfully,
Dr. Thomas Polucki
Upper Cervical Chiropractor, Santa Clarita
Sent from my iPhone
April 8, 2025
I’ve been a fan of KHTS for decades. I fully support their concerns regarding the new project and the parking issues that go along with it. The parking situation in Old Town Newhall is already a nightmare. While we were seated and ready to order brunch at Eat Real On Main, our friends who were trying to join us could not find parking in the parking structure and circled the streets of old town for 25 minutes before finding a place to park.

Sincerely,
Toni Polucki
20 Year Santa Clarita Resident
Sent from my iPhone
04/02/2025
Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community
Dear City of Santa Clarita council members:

Please reconsider building in historic Old Town Newhall which would disrupt the local businesses such as KHTS.

As a long time resident of Santa Clarita I have come to rely on KHTS to get all the local news, weather and traffic information via listening to them on the radio, as well as visiting their website and getting their daily e-mails with all the local stories.

They have been an integral part of our community for years.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.

Carol R.

Valencia, CA
: o
.6. o
o- co
lzo
-o
.9,
-ccooz
,Hoo
o
o)
.c
o) o=o
.a'
o) c=(U
o- o
(Uf
C' oa
(Ufo
.=3Fac'6co
o)
.c=-o
o- $o@
(=o =c) 't-(E0)
o)o .gE cf EO
-aa- E:) arOlZv \.-F\/.=
_T) _c c{ o: @(E0 -) ]c
(Lo
nio
r.c) NoNNao
(Is
Fc\ N+o
tlE
06 o)
o,
O) v
F. NNoE
ll
'xcq)
od=
ilYo
U' go
tl3
oOs
cr) NN
r+
il =(\. =E
.i
(UE
U)
"EFROY
:oo)tr
EO5q.=-
.a. 6
(9b t'6
F"E r.8v€
ag) 6vo@o-o 5-O
EOo- G: t3
b-E i€
(E
.ELso
(u
+,trGoFq
.=G=
AEo
-.:oE
ct)
1A\ voI
a! ()Vc
.EE
ttooGo
;-i -a
'6oEo
-m
.f*f*
rs
ffip
re
(L
Flf) Nqv

34289 Rocking Horse Road ● Agua Dulce, CA 91390 ● (661) 268-8010 www.carouselranch.org
Board of Directors
Missy Carter, President
Steffanie Stelnick, Vice President
Evan Faucette, Treasurer
Marianne Cederlind, Secretary
Yvonne Rockwell, Immed. Past Pres.

Wayne Crawford
Laura Kirchhoff
Briana Kochen
Shannon Mee
Stacy Nochenson
DarinSeegmiller
Bryan Steiner
Denny Twigg
Taylor Adachi. Executive Director
Becky Graham, Program Director
Denise Redmond Ex. Dir. Emeritus
Advisory Cabinet
Julie Benson
John Chernesky
Jeanna Crawford
Therese Edwards
Jeff Hacker
Bob Kellar
Christina Kneisler
Amandalynn Sawyer
Margie Shaffer
Jeri Seratti-Goldman
Susie Sheeler
Greg Spencer
Eric Stroh
Yvonne Waschak
Carousel Ranch
…where hope goes round and round
April 2, 2025
Santa Clarita City Councilmembers
Santa Clarita City Hall
23920 Valencia Blvd.

Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear Members of City Council,
I am contacting you today on behalf of Carl and Jeri Goldman and KHTS Radio as in hopes that you will consider setting perameters on the upcoming construction of the apartment/retail complex next door to their studio in downtown Newhall.

I know that you are all aware of the many things that Carl and Jeri Goldman and KHTS Radio bring to this community. As a non-profit that has worked with them for 20+ years, we have been priviledged to benefit from their on-going support of Carousel Ranch, our events and helping us get the word out to the Santa Clarita community.

These are not small things for us (or the other organizations and businesses in this valley).

On top of that, their news coverage is imperative especially when it comes to emergencies in this valley - such as earthquakes, fires, etc.

While the development will likely be a good thing for the community, the thought of a two year project that would make it impossible for them to continue their operations (which include live radio programming) seems unfair and would essentially drive them out of business. I think we can all agree that would be a terrible shame for the entire Santa Clarita Valley.

With this said, I truly hope that you will take these concerns into consideration and find a way to work with the Goldmans, KHTS and the developers to find a solution that could work for everyone.

Sincerely,
Denise Redmond
Founder/Executive Director Emeritus
Scott Schauer <[email protected]> 12:29 PM (56
minutes ago)
to info
I write this to express my appreciation for the incredible work our local radio station does in our community and to encourage support from our City leaders. Local radio is more than just a platform for music or news; it serves as a vital connection among community members. Their dedication to highlighting local events, artists, businesses and nonprofits creates a sense of belonging and brings us all closer together. I have personally benefited both in business and in working with local non profits for over 35 years with assistance from both Carl and Jeri Goldman and the staff at KHTS..

In a time when many people turn to national media, it's essential to remember the unique value of local voices. Their programs not only entertain but also inform and inspire. Whether it's through interviews with local leaders, coverage of community events, or showcasing local talent, KHTS plays a crucial role in celebrating our community diversity.

I urge our local leaders to consider supporting and finding a solution for the construction going to take place adjacent to the studio that informs our community on a daily basis. Let's help our local station thrive and serve as a beacon for our community. I understand growth and the upgrading of our buildings but as I personally fought my business having to relocate because of the growth of home building on Soledad Canyon. This great city worked with the developer and myself to find a resolution that saved my business, the
Santa Clarita Soccer Center and satisfied our local neighbors. I am hopeful you do the same for our local radio station.
--
Scott Schauer
President
Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff Foundation
Charity Silvers <[email protected]> 1:27 PM (3
hours ago)
to info
To the Council Members of the City of Santa Clarita,
Please listen to the voice of your constituents, the residents of our fine city, and take into account what is best for the residents and not what is best for the large outside business conglomerate that wants to come in and do what they think is best for the SCV. Old Town Newhall has been redeveloped in a very nice way to maintain the small, old town feel that was the original setting when the town was first established. The plans that are in place right now to build the 5 story structure do NOT seem in line with anything that would keep the small town feel of Main Street and the downtown area. There are other places in the city where such a structure would be better placed and where the construction of such would not displace historical buildings nor disrupt long time businesses, like KHTS, from continuing to serve our community.

Please do not silence our beloved radio station who has served the SCV for decades! Sincerely,
Charity Silvers

CORPORATE OFFICE
25115 Avenue Stanford
Suite A-104
Valencia, CA 91355
(661) 257-2339 Main Office
(661) 257-2384 Fax
www.sdfhc.org
Chief Executive Officer

PHILIP SOLOMON, MPA
Board of Directors
Chairperson

GLORIA MERCADO-FORTINE
CEO, Global Education Solutions, Inc.

Vice-Chairperson

MIKE FISHER
Insurance Adjuster
Treasurer

CAROLINA OROZCO HERNANDEZ
Dental Office Manager
ANTHONY McKINNIES
Health Care - Logistics

MIKE THOMAS
Printer, Small Business Owner

PAUL LOWE
Journalist

CHRIS HERMOSURA
Student

LAURA KIRCHHOFF
Program & Event Manager
Bruce Fortine
Business Owner
Board Members Emeritus
ELIJAH CANTY*
JO ANNE DARCY*
EDWARD BOLDEN, JR.

Honorary Board of Directors
REVEREND SAMUEL DIXON, FOUNDER*
EVELYN DIXON*
EVON DIXON-MONTGOMERY, JD*

JOYCE (DIXON) HIGHTOWER, MD

SAMUEL DIXON III, MD

FAITH (DIXON) JOHNSON

TIMOTHY DIXON, MD
*deceased
Val Verde Health Center (661 )257 -4008 | Canyon Country Health Center (661 )424 -1220 Newhall Health Center ( 661 ) 291 - 1777 | Behavioral Health Program ( 661 )468 - 7405 | Dental ( 661 ) 402 – 2319 Dear Honorable Members of the City Council,
I am writing to express my wholehearted support for KHTS who has been an incredible asset to our community, specifically for the support they have provided Samuel Dixon Family Health Center (SDFHC) over the years. When I first became the CEO of SDFHC, both Jeri and Carl were very supportive of my transition into my new role and offered valuable guidance on how we can improve on informing Santa Clarita residents of the vital resources we provide to vulnerable individuals and families of our community. Over the years, KHTS has demonstrated an unwavering commitment to SDFHC and has played a vital role in advancing the work we do, helping us reach wider audiences and inspire action on critical issues. Whether it's through public service announcements, event promotions, or interviews, KHTS has created a space for us to communicate our impact and engage with the community in meaningful ways.

KHTS plays an important role in empowering local nonprofits such as SDFHC.

This station is more than just a media outlet—it is a true partner in fostering a thriving, compassionate, and connected community.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Respectfully,
Philip Solomon, MPA
Chief Executive Officer
Samuel Dixon Family Health Center, Inc.

Suzan Solomon
to me
3:42PM (2
hours ago)
Dear Mayor, Honorable City Council Members and Santa Clarita Planning Manager Leclair,
As you know KHTS Radio is d major voice and pillar of the community. Our residents rely on KHTS for the news, live communication during emergencies and disasters, insights into the Santa Clarita Valley, access to enriching opportunities for our residents, healthcare support for children and youth, as well as support for our local education community, among other humanitarian efforts.

We need KHTS to continue broadcasting in the SCV Community! lt is essential to have construction refrain from coring between the hours of 6:00am-9:00am and in the noon hour, so our Hometown Station continues broadcasting and broadcasting during peak times that bring in high revenue which supports station operation, and contributions to our community.

I can attest to KHTS's impact on our parent organizations in schools, and students across the school districts in our valley. Please help mitigate a construction schedule that meets the needs of our Hometown Radio Station, our residents, and the builder.

Being a good neighbor and community partner is the SCV way! Thank you,
Sue Solomon
4-14-25
Dear Santa Clarita City Council Members,
I am writing to express my appreciation for and support of KHTS and HomeTownStation.com. They have been very impactful in advertising our events over the past many years. People in this city listen to and read from their publications. They are a significant and well-informed voice that should be protected.

The proposed development next to their broadcast facility will make it impossible for them to do business as usual unless they are granted compensation to move, or construction noise is mitigated during their critical hours of operation. Being a good neighbor to me means respecting the right of this vital and valuable institution to continue their service. Losing this source of current and well-presented local news would have negative consequences around the city.

Sincerely,
Scott L Stratton
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
April 14, 2025
To The Santa Clarita City Councilmembers,
I’ve known Carl Goldman, Jeri Seratti-Goldman and KHTS radio since the early 1990’s. As a former member of the William S. Hart School Board, Head of the Santa Clarita Arts Commission, and Field Representative for then Assemblyman, Cameron Smyth I have been very aware of the critical role KHTS has played in Santa Clarita over the decades.

My understanding is their request for minor accommodation during construction so they can continue broadcasting, seems extremely reasonable.

KHTS has been stellar as it has served Santa Clarita for decades. Please assist in allowing them to continue to broadcast.

Respectfully.

Paul Strickland, Sr.

A Professional Corporation
3344 Cherry Jack Lane
Thompsons Station, TN 37179
(661) 251-6031 Fax: (661) 295-0692
[email protected]
April 3, 2025
Honorable City Council Members,
KHTS is the voice of Santa Clarita. In 1990 Carl Goldman and Jeri Seratti Goldman purchased KBET radio out of bankruptcy and ran it out of a trailer on Sierra highway. Along with partners they sold the station to Clear Channel and then repurchased it without partners in 2003 rebranding it to KHTS.

The history is important because the radio station was part of the City’s history even before the City became one in 1987.

To say that KHTS is a historical piece of the Santa Clarita Valley is an understatement. To name just a few historical events you have the 1991 Northridge earthquake, along with numerous fires, along with elections and day to day sporting events like the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Although support for the developments in Old Town Newhall is widely welcomed and particularly by the radio station, it is important to note the impact it will have during the daytime broadcasting. Interrupting broadcasting at these critical hours is not beneficial to anyone and not good business.

Please reconsider your stance on this ongoing issue and thank you for your attention.

Julie M. Sturgeon
04/03/2025
Dear City of Santa Clarita council members:

I’m writing to you to ask that you do not build on the site where the radio station and other historic buildings are.

I have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio.

These days with all information transferring to streaming platforms only, (including local television), listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information on a daily basis.

Thank you for taking the time to read this letter.

Sincerely,
Robert U.

Newhall, CA
Umeck, Judith Ann E <[email protected]> Mon, Apr 7, 10:24 PM (5 hours
ago)
to me, [email protected]
To Whom it may concern:

Hello,
I would like to express my concern over the construction issues facing the businesses on Main St. in Newhall. During my years at Providence High School, we as an educational institution worked through the environmental and sound concerns as the Disney Company expanded their lot in Burbank. After appearances before Burbank City Council, compromises and concessions, Sr Lucille Dean, SP and Michael Eisner were able to come to agreements that allowed the school to flourish.

Three decades later, I ask you to make the same considerations for SCV and our beloved radio station, so that they too may continue to provide the quality information our community needs.

We have all come to rely on KHTS and expect new developers who will benefit from this neighborhood to support the quality of our environment for existing businesses as well.

My years on the Saugus Union School Board provided insight into the need to balance quality of life and business and the challenges of construction.

Please support the longevity of KHTS by considering the needs of their building and the tradition of a hometown station.

Sincerely in Providence,
Judy Egan Umeck, PA
Office of Legacy and Heritage
Providence St. Joseph Health
C- 661-993-9846
[email protected]
As expressions of God’s healing love, witnessed through the ministry of Jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Know me, care for me, ease my way
4/12/25
Dear Mr. Goldman,
I have been following the development of continued upgrades to old town Newhall. It sounds as though there are some exciting things in the works that will continue to strengthen this area as a local attraction, residential community, and focal business point for the Santa Clarita Valley.

I know that you are very involved in advocating for small businesses located in old town Newhall. And as the retired chancellor from the Santa Clarita community college district where we worked with the city to develop a small business development center locally funded when the mall was being built and then acquire state funding for a permanent center that serves not only in Santa Carita Valley but the region, I too am committed to a structure that maximizes the ability of local businesses to function, to thrive, to grow, and to serve their customer base.

When I was leading College of the Canyons for over three and a half decades, before social media and the Internet, the college district relied on KHTS to be a vehicle for it to get the word out about what was going on at the college, what was coming up at the college, and to open the door for people in our service to engage with the college to meet their personal and professional needs. Furthermore, when KHTS was the only local radio channel, listeners at least had a familiar voice that they recognized and could interact with as callers phoned in to ask questions. As the radio station’s capabilities developed, KHTS supported the college to introduce itself to businesses and residents, as well as to develop working relationships with hundreds of partners and users that otherwise would not have been as easy to accomplish.

I want to thank you for working hard to ensure that during the construction of the expansion project for Newhall that KHTS will be afforded an opportunity to operate in designated time zones minus the noise of construction during a specific timeframe.

Loud noise would be distracting and make effective communications on the part of the broadcasters and visitors very challenging and could, in my opinion, impede the communication strategies of the users of KHTS.

With knowledge doubling in a matter of days, local and world conditions changing daily, and new information being interjected into the perspective of how local agencies work to get the word out about their work to the public, this continued access, is, in my mind pivotal.

Thank you for being such a persistent fighter for what is right for the users and the listeners of KHTS.

Dianne Van Hook
To: Santa Clarita City Council
From: Ryan C. Van Wie
Date: April 13th, 2025
Subject: Letter in support of KHTS Radio
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to express my support for KHTS’s reasonable petition to restrict construction hours near their Newhall station. I was raised in Santa Clarita and grew up watching my parents, Jeri Seratti and Carl Goldman, dedicate their time and effort to the city and its residents. From their first few years as Santa Clarita residents, as the owners and managers of KBET AM1220, my parents prioritized public service as core aspect of the station’s mission. This was evident in their response to the 1994 Northridge earthquake, where the station worked around the clock with its counterparts in City Hall and emergency services to provide accurate and timely updates to the community during that public emergency.

Their dedication to public service continued as the station transitioned and grew under the new KHTS banner. Whether it’s been keeping the city updated on serious fires, evacuations, significant traffic, or civic engagement opportunities, KHTS and its staff have been there providing reliable news to Santa Clarita and its residents through it all. Now, as KHTS requires City Hall’s assistance for this reasonable request to restrict nearby heavy drilling to regular business hours, I hope that you all will weigh the Station’s past and future service to the city as you make your decisions.

I appreciate you considering this perspective and for your service to Santa Clarita.

Sincerely,
Ryan Van Wie
April 3rd, 2025
Santa Clarita City Council
To whom it may concern:

I am writing this letter in strong support of KHTS as they face imminent threats due to the planned construction project in Santa Clarita. This station has been an integral part of our community, providing essential local news, weather updates, and coverage of important events that impact residents and businesses alike. As the founder of Project Sebastian, I have personally witnessed the invaluable role this station has played—not only in promoting charitable organizations like mine but also in fostering a sense of unity within our city.

For years, KHTS has generously supported numerous foundations, including mine, by raising awareness, fundraising, and offering guidance. Their dedication to serving Santa Clarita extends far beyond entertainment; they are a cornerstone of our local identity and a lifeline for many organizations and residents. It is deeply concerning that the city has not taken meaningful action to assist them in relocating or ensuring their continued operation, instead prioritizing financial gain over the well-being of the community.

The planned construction poses a severe risk to the station’s ability to function. The disruption from blasting— during peak broadcasting times—threatens their profitability and sustainability. Furthermore, the destruction of a historic building for the sake of development disregards the cultural and historical significance it holds for Santa Clarita. It is unacceptable that the developer has not cooperated in finding a solution, nor has the city intervened to protect this vital institution.

I strongly urge the city and developers to halt construction or take appropriate measures to ensure KHTS is properly relocated without jeopardizing its operations. This station is not just another business—it is a voice for the people, a trusted resource, and a force for good in our community. Allowing this project to proceed unchecked would be a disservice to the very residents the city is meant to serve.

I appreciate your time and consideration in this urgent matter. Please do what is right for Santa Clarita and take action to preserve this essential institution.

Sincerely,
Christopher Velona
Director
www.projectsebastian.org
501c3 #81-4325865
'LINDA VISER' via Info Tue, Apr 15, 8:00 PM (13
hours ago)
to [email protected]
To Whom it May Concern,
KHTS is a very important part of our city. I don't oppose development but we have to be respectful of businesses which cannot thrive if development is allowed to blast, drill, and core during business hours.

KHTS is asking for quiet between 6 and 9 am, Monday through Friday, and 30 minutes during lunch. Considering how disruptive this will be for them even if that request is granted, please amend Serrano Development's working hours to avoid blasting, drilling, and coring during those times.

Thank you.

Linda Viser
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
March 29, 2025
To whom it may concern,
I write this letter in support of KHTS radio and its owners, Carl and Jeri Seratti-Goldman. KHTS is a vital media outlet serving the Santa Clarita Valley region with up to the minute news, traffic, weather, and entertainment. But today they are facing an existential threat, as a major construction project will soon interrupt their broadcasting capabilities.

Throughout their history, KHTS has been the outlet that Santa Clarita goes to in times of crisis.

Be it fires, earthquakes, pandemic, or other tragedy, KHTS is the source that our community turns to for immediate information. As a 45 year resident of the Santa Clarita Valley, I remember listening to our local radio station often. Specifically, I recall sitting on my front lawn with a portable radio listening to KHTS for updates and information immediately following the 1994 Northridge earthquake. In 2019, when wildfires were threatening multiple locations in the valley, it was KHTS that we all turned to for important information. the same was true following the Saugus high school shooting that same year. shortly thereafter, with the beginning of the pandemic, KHTS was the station that our community turned to for up-to-date information.

Not only are they an important media outlet, but KHTS and the Goldmans have been an important source of community service and support for decades. They volunteer their time and resources to support local nonprofit organizations, and the community at large. This philanthropy has been recognized on multiplications, as both Carl and Jeri have been honored with the title of Man/Woman of the Year in our community. Our school organization, SCVi and iLEAD Schools, has benefited from their goodwill and support since before our founding in 2008. KHTS has become an important part of our marketing strategy. If this construction interrupts their broadcasting capabilities, we will lose a vital source of advertising, as we run regular commercials, as well as host a live educational show at the station on Friday mornings.

Santa Clarita needs KHTS. I urge you to consider alternative construction plans that mitigate the impact on KHTS's broadcasting capabilities.

Matthew Watson
Executive Director of Development, iLEAD California Schools Trustee, Saugus Union School District

Andy Winchester <[email protected]> 6:25 AM (2 hours ago)
to info
To whom it may concern,
I believe this construction company should not only pay for the move of the radio station but also compensate them for the inconvenience. Also, keep in mind that some things are left untouched or maybe renovated vs. leveling something and building huge structures that leave the area unrecognizable.
-Andrew Winchester
Elliott Wolfe 10:38 AM (9
minutes ago)
to me
To the Santa Clarita City Council Members: This memo is to incicate my concern about the pending matter before the council to allow a large residential project to be built in downtown Newhall.

I am certain that most of you will recall that I and my wife, Judith, were the founders of the SCV Veterans' Collaborative, and we also supported many of you during your re-elections, etc.

During our time serving the veteran population. we were given a huge amount of help by Jeri and Carl Goldeman of KHTS, for which we are totally indebted, and I wish to express my concern over the extent to which their damages have, and will continue to result, unless specific assistance is given to lessen their business plight.

Thank you for your consideration.

Elliott S. Wolfe
'Denise Youngwood' via Info Tue, Apr 15, 11:05 PM (10
hours ago)
to [email protected]
To: The Santa Clarita City Council,
Re: Request for the Serrano Development Group to help KHTS by curtailing blasting, drilling or coring during weekday early mornings and lunch time.

Our local radio station, Hometown Station, aka KHTS and formerly known as KBET has been a vital part of our Santa Clarita community for close to 35 years. They do a phenomenal job of keeping residents informed with local news, events, traffic and weather. I remember during the 1994 earthquake they immediately mobilized and were the central communication hub for our city, taking live calls from the city officials, local businesses and residents, and then disbursing important information to their listeners. They were our lifeline. I was so proud to live in a city that had such a great radio station.

KHTS must not be silenced, not even temporarily. Our businesses and residents need their reporting to be live on a daily basis and especially if there should be another local disaster we would need them to be here for us. Their live broadcasting would be critical for our recovery.

I urge you to please consider KHTS's request to mitigate the Serrano Development Group's proposal by having them curtail blasting, drilling or coring between 6am-9am Monday through Friday and 30 minutes during lunch time.

Thank you for your consideration on this very important issue.

Warm regards,
Denise L Youngwood
'Eileen Zierhut' via Info 3:12 AM (6
hours ago)
to info
To Whom It May Concern:

We need to keep Santa Clarita’s hometown radio station running and serving this community. No more big business backdoor deals. I am asking the city to intervene and represent the people you serve by curtailing blasting, drilling or coring for the new proposed adjacent building to between 6am-9am Monday through Friday and 30 minutes during lunch. They can blast the remaining hours of the week.

Thank you,
Dr Eileen Zierhut
40 year resident of this community
Sent from my iPhone

Agenda Item: 1

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA

PLANNING COMMISSION

AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS
PLANNING MANAGER APPROVAL:

DATE: March 18, 2025
SUBJECT: NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)
APPLICANT: Serrano Development Group
LOCATION: 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street And 22505 Market Street CASE PLANNER: Emily Rubalcava

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Planning Commission:

1. Conduct the public hearing;

2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and will comply with all mitigation measures established by the FEIR;

3. Adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending that the City Council approve Master Case 24- 134 (Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24- 005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012) for the construction of a new five-story mixed-use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); and

4. Take additional, related action that may be desirable.

REQUEST
The applicant, Serrano Development Group, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Architectural Design Review (ADR), and Development Review (DR) for the redevelopment of the project site into a new five-story mixed1 Packet Pg. 8

use project and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building located at 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 2831-012-022 through -026), within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP).

BACKGROUND
Project Setting
The project site consists of five parcels within the OTNSP area, totaling three-quarters of an acre. It is located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. There are three existing buildings on-site:

1. Mac’s Pool Supply commercial building – 24316 Main Street (APNs 2831-012-025 and - 026). The existing pool supply business occupied the building in 2016.

2. Horseshoe on Main commercial building – 24300 and 24308 Main Street (APNs 2831- 012-023 and -024). On May 21, 2023, the property was entitled for the construction of a new outdoor food court use, but halted its progress for the proposed project. The property is currently being used seasonally for holiday events. Before this, the property was known as Soundsations, a car stereo installation shop.

3. Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building – 22505 Market Street (APN 2831-012-022). This building is identified on the Historic Preservation list of potentially historic structures located in the OTNSP. The existing building was constructed using repurposed material from the Mayhue building, a former dance hall dating back to the late 1800s. In 1932, the ground floor was occupied as the Courthouse, while the second floor was occupied by the Masonic Lodge. In 1968, the Court relocated to Valencia and the building has been used as offices since then.

Project Submittal
On April 17, 2024, the applicant submitted a One Stop Preliminary Plan Review to the Planning Division for a new five-story mixed-use building on the Mac’s Pool Supply and Horseshoe on Main properties. The review was completed on June 6, 2024.

On June 28, 2024, the applicant submitted an application to develop the project, including 51 units, 3,400 square feet of ground floor commercial space, and two levels of parking, one subterranean and one at street level. In response to the One Stop comments, the application identified the proposed architectural style for the building as Western Victorian, and included architectural elements in line with this style. The project was deemed complete on August 12, 2024.

On November 27, 2024, the applicant revised the project scope, expanding the project site footprint to include the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse property and incorporating additional architectural enhancements in response to comments from City of Santa Clarita (City) staff and the City’s architectural consultant. The revised project included additional units, for a total of 78, and additional commercial floor area, for a total of 5,223 square feet. 1 Packet Pg. 9

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Development Proposal
The applicant is proposing the demolition of the Mac’s Pool Supply, Horseshoe on Main, and Masonic Lodge/Courthouse buildings for the full-block development of a new mixed-use building consisting of 78 apartments and approximately 5,200 square feet of commercial. The proposed building would be five-stories, 52 feet in height, over one subterranean level of parking. Commercial store fronts are located at the ground level facing Main Street, with groundlevel parking behind, within the building footprint. Apartment units are located on the upper levels and oriented around an internal courtyard located on the second floor. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via two new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. In addition, one existing driveway on Main Street would be closed, allowing for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street.

The project site and surrounding areas are shown in the attached Aerial and Zoning Map.

Entitlement Summary
Implementation of the project will require the approval of the following entitlements:

Conditional Use Permit 24-007
Required to increase the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) above 200 percent of the structure’s first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP.

Minor Use Permit 24-015
Required for the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building with City Council approval; and required for the export of 18,972 cubic yards of dirt.

Adjustment Permit 24-005
Required to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20 percent from OTNSP standards, from 13,650 square feet to 10,929 square feet.

Development Review 24-012 and Architectural Design Review 24-017 Required to ensure that the project, site plan, and architecture complies with all of the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC), the General Plan, and OTNSP.

Amenity Areas
Each unit has a balcony to provide private outdoor space. Balconies range in size from 75 square feet to 100 square feet. In addition, the proposal includes 10,929 square feet of shared residential amenity space, providing an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and a bike room for residents to do bike maintenance. 1 Packet Pg. 10

Architecture
The OTNSP prescribes Craftsman, Main Street Commercial, Mediterranean, Monterey, and Western Victorian as appropriate architectural styles. The proposed project is designed in the Western Victorian architectural style and draws inspiration from both the historic and newer buildings in Old Town Newhall, including the Southern Hotel building and the Old Town Newhall Library. Through the design process, the project was reviewed for compliance by the City’s architectural consultant, and City staff worked with the applicant through multiple iterations to refine key architectural elements. This included emphasizing the building’s corners and enhancing the roofline to diversify the building’s massing. The Western Victorian architectural style is accomplished through features such as cornices with decorative brackets, wood siding on the building’s entrance and corner towers, and awnings along the commercial storefronts. Additionally, the applicant has proposed to incorporate two murals along the North Elevation; the murals would pay homage to the Western character of Old Town Newhall. The proposed architecture would be complementary to the existing surrounding architecture and is consistent with the OTNSP.

Parking
A total of 122 parking stalls for the residential units are provided on-site, within ground floor and subterranean parking levels. Residential guest parking will use public parking stalls, and the applicant will utilize the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement. Changes to California law (AB 2097) limits the City’s ability to impose minimum parking requirements within one-half mile of transit stations unless there is a negative impact on residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site. A parking demand study was prepared by the applicant demonstrating parking will be adequate as proposed in compliance with AB 2097. Additional discussion is provided in the Analysis portion of this report.

Removal of Masonic Lodge/Courthouse
The project proposal includes the demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. The City Council, in the adoption of the OTNSP and the Historic Preservation Ordinance, designated a list of structures, including this building as historic resources. Section 17.64.090 of the UDC empowers the City Council to approve, approve with modifications and/or conditions, or deny a request for demolition of a historic resource. The applicant has requested an MUP to delist the building as a historic resource and to demolish it. The Planning Commission will hear the request for the MUP, and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council has the ultimate decision-making authority for the MUP to delist and demolish the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse.

To address potential impacts to historic resources, the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measures related to the demolition of historic resources.

Mitigation measure (MM) CUL-1 provides a path forward to remove any City Council designated historic structures. The applicant has provided a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, finding that the historical integrity of the building was severely compromised by a remodel in 1968, that no interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse, and that it would be infeasible to relocate the building to another location. In addition, to fulfill MM1 Packet Pg. 11

CUL-1, the applicant has been conditioned to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse by:
(1) recording the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, (2) installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, (3) placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and (4) making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts.

GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES
The project site is located within the OTNSP and has a General Plan designation of Specific Plan. The project site has a zoning designation of AE under the OTNSP, which is the zoning designation applied to the central portions of Old Town Newhall generally aligned with Main Street. This zone contemplates commercial uses, arts and entertainment uses, and mixed-use development with housing. Ground floor uses are intended to accommodate art galleries, theaters, performance venues, specialty retail and restaurants, while upper floors accommodate offices or housing (OTNSP Table 4.2-4). The zone intends to promote a mixed-use walkable neighborhood and activation of Main Street as a lively and engaging public space. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, west, and south, and the Metrolink station to the east.

Table 1 summarizes the Specific Plan designations, zoning, and land uses for the project site and adjacent properties.

Table 1:

Specific Plan
and Zoning
Designation
Land Use
Project Site OTNSP-AE Proposed Mixed Use Building
North OTNSP-AE Specialty Retail (Earth Baby Boutique)
and KHTS Radio Station
South OTNSP-AE Restaurant (El Trocadero), Indoor
Entertainment (The Main)
West OTNSP-AE Liquor Store (Bonanza Liquor Market)
East OTNSP-N Jan Heidt Metrolink Station
Key: AE = Arts & Entertainment; N = Neighborhood

ANALYSIS
General Plan Compliance
The proposed project would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation:

Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth. 1 Packet Pg. 12

Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed-use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed-use zoning.

Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels.

The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed-use building in a walkable and transit-friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes.

OTNSP Compliance
New developments within the OTNSP area must comply with the design standards of the zone and building type. The proposed project is a Stacked Dwelling building type combined with a Commercial building type, which is defined as a vertically stacked structure that accommodates housing above commercial uses. The Stacked Dwelling building type includes thresholds for building massing by establishing a certain allowable FAR for the upper floors of the building.

The total square footage of a building may exceed 200 percent, or an FAR of 2.0, of the structure’s first-floor footprint, with the approval of a CUP. The proposed project would have a FAR of 4.76. The proposed project is consistent with this standard as a CUP has been requested to increase the FAR of the project as allowed by the OTNSP.

The Stacked Dwelling building type has private outdoor space requirements for the residential portion of projects. Projects must provide private residential outdoor space, which is defined as a balcony, yard, or other private space. The private outdoor space requirement is 75 square feet for one-bedroom units, and 100 square feet for two or three-bedroom units. As proposed, each unit provides the required balcony space in compliance with the OTNSP standard for private outdoor space.

In addition, there are requirements for shared residential amenity space, which is defined as shared recreational facilities such as a park, pool, fitness facility, etc. The requirement for shared residential amenity space is 150 square feet for one-bedroom units and 200 square feet for two or three-bedroom units. As proposed, the project would require 13,650 square feet of shared residential amenity space; the applicant is seeking an ADJ to reduce the shared amenity space requirement by 20 percent, and would provide a total of 10,929 square feet of shared residential amenities, including a pool and spa within a central courtyard, clubhouse/lounge, and garden corridor with herb garden.

As discussed in the project description above, the applicant has invoked AB 2097, which prohibits the City from requiring parking minimums on projects within a half mile of transit, unless the project would have a negative impact on the existing parking supply. While the OTNSP development standards would require two parking spaces per residential unit, half a space per unit of guest parking, and one parking space for the first 1,500 square feet of new commercial development, plus one space per every additional 350 square feet, the parking demand study prepared by the applicant demonstrates that sufficient parking would be provided 1 Packet Pg. 13

by the project to avoid a substantially negative impact on existing parking.

Table 2 shows the required parking under the OTNSP, the proposed parking to be provided by the project, and the state baseline per AB 2097.

Table 2:

OTNSP Requirement Proposed State Baseline
Residential 156 spaces 122 on-site spaces 0 spaces
Guest 39 spaces 20 public spaces 10 spaces
Commercial 12 spaces (OTNSP
in-lieu fee) OTNSP in-lieu fee 0 spaces
1 e.g. street or public garage parking
The OTNSP identifies five architectural styles that define the character of Old Town Newhall.

As outlined in the project description above, the project has been reviewed by the City’s architectural consultant and is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. In addition, the project meets all other design standards of the OTNSP for the Stacked Dwelling building type, including requirements for setbacks and height. The height of the project is consistent with existing buildings in Old Town Newhall, such as Newhall Crossings and the Old Town Newhall Library.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR. As described, the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required.

NOTICING
All notices as required by law were completed. Property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site were notified of the public hearing by mail (106 notices). A public notice was placed in The Signal on February 25, 2025, and a sign was posted on the project site on March 4, 2025.

As of the publishing of this agenda, the Planning Division has received one letter of support in regards to the project (attached).

CONCLUSION
The Newhall Mixed-Use Project is consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan, SCMC, and OTNSP. Therefore, City staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending that the City Council approve Master Case 24-134 (CUP24- 007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012) for the construction of a new fivestory mixed-use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse 1 Packet Pg. 14

building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A);

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution P25-03
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134)
Exhibit A Attachment #1 (Market Street Striping)
Exhibit A Attachment #2 (Parks Planning Fee Estimate)
Aerial and Zoning Map
Site & Floor Plans
Elevations & Renderings
Notice of Determination
Public Hearing Notice
Letter From Historical Society
Comment Letters
1 Packet Pg. 15

RESOLUTION P25-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE MASTER CASE 24-134, CONSISTING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012,

FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW FIVE-STORY MIXED USE BUILDING AND

DEMOLITION AND DELISTING OF THE MASONIC LODGE/COURTHOUSE BUILDING LOCATED AT 24300, 24308, 24316 MAIN STREET AND 22505 MARKET STREET (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS: 2831-012-022 THROUGH -026), IN THE CITY OF

SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A).

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. The Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:

A. On June 28, 2024, the applicant (Serrano Development Group) initiated Master Case 24-134, consisting of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-007, Minor Use Permit (MUP) 24-015), Adjustment Permit (ADJ) 24-005, Architectural Design Review (ADR) 24-017, and Development Review (DR) 24-012. The properties affected by the initial application were Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 2831-012-023 through -026; B. On November 27, 2024, the application was revised to include an additional property which is APN 2831-012-022;
C. The application was deemed complete on November 27, 2024; D. The project site consists of five parcels totaling three-quarters of an acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. The project proposes to demolish three existing buildings on-site: Mac’s Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Soundsations (24300 and 24308 Main Street), and the City Council designated historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street);
E. The project site is located within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP);
F. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structures on-site to construct a new fivestory mixed-use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area and 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and first-floor parking level. The project includes the closure of one driveway on Main Street and would allow for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requests relief from the

1.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
requirements of the OTNSP to include a 20-percent reduction from the shared residential amenity space and to increase the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) above 200 percent of the structure’s first floor footprint;
G. In compliance with AB 2097, the applicant is proposing to provide residential and on-street guest parking to avoid a negative impact on commercial and residential parking within onehalf mile of the project site, as demonstrated in the parking demand study on file with the Planning Division. Specifically, the study proposes to provide a 1.56 residential parking ratio on-site instead of the 2.0 ratio required by the OTNSP. The study also proposes a 0.25 per unit ratio for guest parking to be accommodated on-street instead of the required 0.5 per unit ratio. The proposed development is utilizing the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement;
H. The project proposes to demolish a building included on the OTNSP’s Historic Preservation list and designated as historic by the City Council under the Historic Preservation Ordinance.

The OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measure CUL-1, which governs the demolition of historical structures. The applicant has submitted a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, which states that this structure is no longer historically significant, and would fulfill the requirements of mitigation measure CUL-1 by recording the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts;
I. On March 18, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City) Planning Commission at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita;
J. At this public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, staff presentation, applicant’s presentation, and public testimony; and K. This Resolution and its findings are made based upon the entire administrative record including, without limitation, testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at its March 18, 2025, public hearing including, without limitation, the staff report.

SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MASTER CASE 24-134. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows:

A. The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. In particular, the applicant would fulfill the requirements of mitigation measure CUL-1. As demonstrated by the letter on file from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse has been substantially altered and no further action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required. Consequently, a Notice of Determination was prepared for this project in compliance with CEQA;

1.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
B. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based is the Master Case 24-134 project file. This project file is located within the Community Development Department in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and
C. Based upon the findings set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby finds the Notice of Determination for this Project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA.

SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission determines as follows:

A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The proposed project would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation:

The proposed project would be consistent with the following policies of the General Plan:

Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth.

Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed-use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed-use zoning.

Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels.

The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed-use building in a walkable and transit-friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes.

B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP);
The proposed project would be consistent with the following findings of the OTNSP:

OTNSP-1: That the proposed use or project is consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan.

OTNSP-2: That the proposed use or project meets the development requirements for the

1.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
Zone within which it is located including parking, architecture, and ground-floor uses.

A Stacked Dwelling building type is permitted by right in the AE zone of the OTNSP only as part of a vertical mixed-use project with upper floor residential. Any future tenants in the new commercial spaces constructed by the project will be subject to the requirements of OTNSP Table 4.2-1, the permitted use chart for the AE zone. A CUP is requested to increase the allowable FAR above 200 percent of the structure’s first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP. An ADJ is requested to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20-percent from OTNSP standards. The building is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. The proposed project complies with all other development standards for the AE zone and Stacked Dwelling building type. With the conditions of approval, the project will with Title 16 and 17 of the SCMC and the OTNSP
C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and
The proposed project is not located on a hazardous site and would not include any hazardous materials. Standard construction materials and methods would be utilized to ensure safety during construction. The applicant will be required to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations, including, without limitation: the California Building Standards Code and Fire Code. Sufficient access for firefighting purposes has been provided and verified by the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (LACFD), and the applicant must comply with all LACFD requirements.

D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal’s physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use;
The subject site includes existing commercial development and surface parking. The parking demand study for the project demonstrates that sufficient parking is provided for the proposed building. The proposed building complies with the City’s standards for mixed-use development, including compliance with setbacks, building height, drive aisle width, and landscaping.

2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate;
The project is accessed via Market Street and Railroad Avenue, and improvements to the roadway will be required for the proposed building. The applicant must comply with all

1.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
City-imposed engineering requirements when constructing any improvements in the right-of-way, such as sewer laterals, parkway tree installation, and ADA paths of travel at the driveways. The project will not have a significant effect on vehicle miles traveled or traffic, and existing driveway ingress and egress from the site will be maintained. With the proposed improvements along the project’s frontage, the project will be in compliance with all requirements of the City’s Department of Public Works.

3. Public protection services (e.g. Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc.) are readily available; and
The project will have public protection services provided by both the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) and Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD), and will not require any additional resources or services from those organizations as a result of its operation. The proposal would also be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the LACFD and LASD.

4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, schools. Solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site.

The proposed use would be located within an existing commercial area, which is located within a developed urbanized area with available and adequate utilities to serve the site.

The proposed project would connect to this existing infrastructure on-site.

SECTION 4: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FOR THE RELOCATION OR DEMOLITION OF A HISTORIC RESOURCE. As required by Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section

17.64.100, the City Council must approve the relocation or demolition of a property or structure that has been designated as a historic resource. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council determine as follows:

A. That the City Council must make findings to relocate a historic structure. Alternatively, upon completion of environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition.

As identified in the letter provided by the Santa Clarita Historical Society, relocation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building is not feasible. In addition, the historical integrity of the building has been severely compromised by a remodel in 1968. No interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse. As described above, the project is consistent with the previously prepared EIR for the OTNSP, including MM-CUL-1. The applicant will record the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, install a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, place a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and make a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. Therefore, the requirements of the SCMC and

1.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
the OTNSP for the delisting and demolition of a building designated as a historic resource have been met.

SECTION 5: FINDINGS FOR ADJUSTMENT PERMIT. As required by Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section 17.24.100, based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission determines as follows:

1. That the adjustment does not authorize a use or activity that is not allowed in the zone; The ADJ is consistent with the development standards of the OTNSP and will not authorize a use or activity that is prohibited under the zone. All proposed uses and activities remain within the scope of the OTNSP. The proposed project furthers the goal of creating a vibrant and active Main Street, and would further enliven the area by providing street-level retail space along with additional residential density in this urban environment.

2. That granting an adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which would otherwise be denied to the property for which the adjustment is sought; and The proposed project meets the intent and goals of the OTNSP, as described above, and provides meaningful shared amenity space as required by the specific plan. The applicant is providing 10,929 square feet of amenity space, 20 percent less than the 13,560 square feet required by the OTNSP. The provided amenities include an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and bike room for residents of the proposed development. The provided amenities meet the intent of the OTNSP and the provided square footage is appropriate given the compact, high-density nature of the development, while remaining within the height requirements of the OTNSP.

3. That the granting of the adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.

As described above, the development, including the grating of the ADJ, will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property as it is providing a reduction to a development standard that has been evaluated and reviewed and all appropriate agencies.

SECTION 6: DETERMINATION; APPROVALS. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council takes the following actions:

Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134, Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24- 017, and Development Review 24-012, for the construction of a new five-story mixeduse building at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue and the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, subject to the conditions of approval (Exhibit A).

1.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
SECTION 7: RELIANCE ON RECORD. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the Planning Commission in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 8: SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 9: NOTICE. The Secretary is directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the Planning Commission and any other person requesting a copy.

SECTION 10: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the Planning Commission’s final decision made on March 18, 2025.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2025.

LISA EICHMAN, CHAIRPERSON

PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:

RACHEL CLARK, SECRETARY

PLANNING COMMISSION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
I, Rachel Clark, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18
th day of March, 2025, by the following vote
of the Planning Commission:

AYES: COMMISSIONERS:

NOES: COMMISSIONERS:

1.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Resolution P25-03
Master Case 24-134
March 18, 2024
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:

PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY

1.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Resolution P25-03 (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134))

EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION P25-03
MASTER CASE 24-134

DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the permittee agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa Clarita’s (City) approval of Master Case 24-134.

GENERAL CONDITIONS
GC1. The approval of this project will expire if the approved use is not commenced within two years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the SCMC.

GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval must be terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre-commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of sixty (60) calendar days or more must terminate the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use must not be re-established or resumed after the sixty (60) day period. Discontinuation must include cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume.

GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the conditionally-approved project before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration.

GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term “permittee” includes the permittee and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The permittee is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee.

GC5. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspection requirements as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director (Director).

1.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the plans date-stamped on file, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein.

GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon permittee’s successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the SCMC.

GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval.

GC9. When Exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail.

GC10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed.

GC11. The permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020.

GC12. The permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by the City Council.

GC13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director.

GC14. This decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval.

GC15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all

1.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated.

GC16. The City will not issue a final certificate of occupancy until the permittee complies with all project conditions.

GC17. Permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys' fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys' fees are paid by the permittee.

PLANNING DIVISION
PL1. The permittee is granted approval to construct the Newhall Mixed-Use Project, including a five-story mixed use building located on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project includes 5,223 square feet of first-floor commercial space, 78 residential units on floors two through five, and subterranean and first floor garaged parking consistent with the approved plans on file for Master Case 24-134.

PL2. The construction of the project must be consistent with the approved plans, elevations, colors, materials, and other elements on file with the Planning Division. Any modification to the approved project and plans is subject to further review and approval of the Director.

PL3. The building is approved at the heights shown on the approved elevations and cannot exceed 55 feet in height. Architectural enhancements extending above the roofline are permitted only as shown on the approved plans and may not exceed an additional 12 feet in height.

PL4. The permittee is providing less parking than required by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) pursuant to Government Code § 65863.2. To address the potential for a substantially negative impact to residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site, the permittee must provide a minimum of 122 parking stalls on-site (1.56 stalls per unit residential parking ratio). Tandem stalls are permitted as shown on the approved site plan. Guest parking is satisfied with 20 public on-street stalls (0.25 stalls per unit guest parking ratio).

PL5. In lieu of constructing 12 parking stalls for the commercial portion of the project, the permittee is required to pay $70,261.20 ($5,855.10 per required parking stall) into the OTNSP Parking In-Lieu Fee Program before the Building Official issues any building permit. This fee is subject to revision and the applicant will be responsible for the fee in place at the time the fee is paid
PL6. Before any permit is issued including, without limitation, a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, the permittee must complete all required recordation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, as required by the OTNSP Environmental Impact

1.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

Report Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and the permittee’s commitments to preserving the building’s history as approved by the City Council.

PL7. Before the Building Official issues a demolition permit, the permittee must donate $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts.

PL8. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install a commemorative plaque on the building exterior and provide an art installation within the lobby to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building.

PL9. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must obtain a Temporary Use Permit and install two murals on the North Elevation as shown on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division.

PL10. The uses in the commercial building are subject to the permitted use chart for the AE zone of the OTNSP.

PL11. All roof-mounted and ground-mounted equipment must be screened from public view.

PL12. No signage is approved by this permit. All future signage requires a sign permit application in accordance with the OTNSP. Exposed neon is not permitted.

Landscaping Conditions
LR1. Before the City Engineer issues grading permit(s), the permittee must provide final landscape, lighting and irrigation plans (Landscape Document Package) for the Director’s review and approval. The Landscape Document Package must be prepared by a California-registered landscape architect and must be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20º to 30º F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105º F to 110º F). The Landscape Document Package must meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as well as all other SCMC requirements.

LR2. The permittee is required to pay all associated fees to the City before the release of the approved Landscape Document Package for the project.

LR3. The permittee must coordinate with the Director of Administrative Services regarding any landscaping installed on City right-of-way. The Director of Administrative Services must review the landscape and irrigation plans when submitted, and all such landscaping must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services before installation. The permittee must receive final approval for the installed landscape before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy.

LR4. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install all proposed irrigation and landscaping, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection.

1.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

LR5. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must submit to the Director a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation were installed and function according to the approved Landscape Document Package.

ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
General Requirements
EN1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must provide an approval letter from Southern California Edison (Distribution Division and/or Transmission Division, as appropriate) and from all other affected utilities for the proposed grading and improvements adjacent to their existing facilities, as required by the City Engineer.

EN2. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, all new and existing power lines and overhead cables less than 34 KV within or fronting the project site must be installed underground by the permittee.

Certificate of Compliance Requirements
EN3. Before the Building Official issues any building permit, a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment encompassing all parcels within the boundaries of this project prepared by or under the direction of a person licensed to practice land surveying in the State of California must be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; in compliance with applicable law
Grading and Geology Requirements
EN4. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit a grading plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. The grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations, including seismic hazards associated with liquefaction.

EN5. Before the Building Official issues building permit, the permittee must construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain rough grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer, or designee.

EN6. This project anticipates export of 18,972 CY of dirt. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit for this project, the permittee must submit a copy of the grading permit for the receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The permittee is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the dirt hauling operation.

A. The permittee must comply with the following requirements for the dirt hauling operation:
i. Obtain an encroachment permit for the work.

1.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

ii. The hours of operation must be between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. iii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

B. The permittee must pay a Haul Route Pavement Repair Security Cash Deposit (Deposit) of $75,000, which may be increased or decreased based upon an estimated cost to complete the repairs of streets damaged during the dirt hauling operation. The limits and scope of the repairs is determined by the City Engineer. To receive a refund of the Deposit, the permittee or subsequent property owners must complete the pavement repairs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within one year from the completion of the dirt hauling operation. If the pavement repairs are not completed within one year, the City may use the Deposit to complete the repairs. Any funds remaining at the completion of the repairs will be refunded to the permittee. If the Deposit is insufficient to complete the repairs, the City will seek additional funds from the permittee.

C. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any pavement damaged by the dirt hauling operation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of the road repairs must be consistent with the approved haul route.

EN7. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must obtain and submit to Engineering Services Division a notarized Letter of Permission for review and approval for grading over easements/outside of the property lines from the affected easement holder/adjacent property owner(s).

Drainage Requirements
EN8. Before the City Engineer, or designee issues a grading permit, the permittee must have the site drainage study approved by the City Engineer demonstrating that postdevelopment flows from the site will not be increased from pre-development flows, or mitigate for the increase.

Water Quality Requirements
EN9. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit to Engineering Services Division for review and approval an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan.

Street Light Relocation Requirements
EN10. Before street plan approval, the permittee must submit a revised Street Light Plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must relocate the existing street light along Railroad Avenue per the approved revised plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

1.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

Street Improvement Requirements
EN11. Before the revised street plan approval and any construction within public street right-ofway, the permittee must submit to the City Engineer or designee a revised street improvement plan for review and approval to obtain encroachment permits from the City Engineer, or designee.

EN12. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee is required to dedicate a portion of its property to City for public right-of-way to meet the requirements of SCMC Section

17.55, creating a clear sight triangle ensuring unobstructed views for drivers. Permittee may, but is not required to, reserve property rights to include all projections, such as awnings, within the airspace of the dedicated public right-of-way. Such reservation must be approved as to form by the City Attorney.

EN13. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee must submit a street tree location plan to the Urban Forestry Administrator for review and approval. The plan must include proposed sewer lateral locations, storm drain infrastructure, and trees must not conflict with the proposed infrastructure.

EN14. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant Curb Ramp (per the Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC), Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) along the property frontage corner at the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street and dedicate necessary easement to the City, as directed by the City Engineer.

EN15. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an ADA compliance Curb Ramp (per SPPWC Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) at all three other corners of the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street per the State of California DOT Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 82-06 and as directed by the City Engineer. Railroad Avenue is designated as a State Route and any modification at the intersection, requires existing nonstandard curb ramps to be reconstructed to current standards per DIB 82-06.

EN16. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must dedicate sidewalk easements sufficient to encompass ADA requirements for sidewalks installed with drive approaches per the current SPPWC Standard Plan 110-2, Type C, or equivalent.

EN17. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must replace the abandoned driveway(s) with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement in accordance with SPPWC standards and in compliance with OTNSP, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A revised street plan and encroachment permit is required.

1.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval

EN18. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk, and refurbish the half section of pavement on streets abutting the project, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Sewer Improvement Requirements
EN19. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the proposed building(s) lateral line(s) must connect to the existing public sewer main in Market Street (8” sewer per PC CI2520), and the permittee must coordinate with the Building & Safety Division regarding payment of additional annexation fees, if required, to annex the property into the County Sanitation District.

EN20. The on-site sewer is a privately maintained. Before grading plan approval, the permittee must submit an “on-site sewer plan.” The “on-site sewer plan” are designed per the California Plumbing Code and approved by the Building Official before Grading Plan approval.

EN21. Before the Building Official issues Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct all sewer upgrades per the approved sewer area study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

EN22. The permittee must also obtain a permit from LA County Building Official to install a new saddle on the existing public sewer by LA County Sewer Maintenance Division, if the wye does not exist on the existing public sewer.

Bond, Fees and Miscellaneous Requirements
EN23. Before City Engineer, or designee issue encroachment permits for public improvements (Street), the permittee, by agreement with the City Engineer, must guarantee installation of the improvements through faithful performance bonds, letters of credit or any other acceptable means in a form approved by the City Attorney. Certificate of Occupancy/Occupancies are withheld if the improvements are not completed.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
TE1. Before the City Engineer issues street plan approval, the permittee must show on the street plan drive approaches using a modified commercial driveway design (APWA 110- 2, Type C or equivalent) that will provide a street/drive approach transition with a maximum algebraic grade difference of 10%. Construction details will be shown on the street plan providing a transition no greater than this maximum.

TE2. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must modify the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street to eliminate the curb bulbout on the southbound (Railroad Avenue) approach.

1.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) (NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134)) Exhibit A
Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval