Agenda — Santa Maria City Council, June 3, 2025 (part 2 of 4)

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2103-2108 “HUTA” Cities and counties receive revenue from the motor vehicle fuel taxes imposed pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7360(a) and (b) through the Highway User Tax Account under the following formulas outlined in the Streets and Highways code and illustrated in Figure 1.

Section 2104. Section 2104 allocates funds to counties with designated allotm ents for engineering and administration, snow removal, heavy rainfall / storm damage as well as county streets, roads and public mass transit guideways and facilities.

Section 2105. Section 2105(a) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in e xcess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among counties based on population.

Section 2105(b) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in e x c e s s o f 9 c e n t s p e r g a l l o n ( i . e . t h e Proposition 111 rate) monthly among cities based on population.

Section 2106. Revenues equal to 1.04 cents per gallon are allocated as follows:
a. $7.2 million per year to the State Bicycle Transportation Account. b. $400 per month to each city ($2,308,800 per year among the 481 eligible cities2) c. $800 per month to each county ($556,800 per year among the 58 counties) d. The residual amount to each county and the cities in that county based on registered vehicles. In each county, from this amount, the county receives an allotment base d on the share of assessed value of t h e c ou n t y w h i c h i s i n t h e u n i n c or p or a t e d a r e a . T h e r e ma i n d e r is allocated to the cities within the county based on population.

2 The city of Rolling Hills has only private streets and is therefor not eligible to receive these allocations.

Attachment C

Page 3 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Section 2107. This section provides monthly allocations to cities of 1.315 cents per gallon of gasoline, 1.8 cents per gallon of diesel, and 2.59 cents per liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as follows. a. Each city with snow removal costs in excess of $5,000 is allocated 50 percent of the cost exceeding $5,000.
b. The remainder is allocated to cities based on population.

Section 2107.5. These funds (about $2.7 million per year) are allocated to cities annually in July based on population as follows:

Section 2107.5 funds must be used for engineering costs and adm inistrative expenses related to city streets. Cities with populations under 10,000 may also expend the moneys for street construction or acquisition of street rights-of-way.

Section 2103 HUTA and the 2010 Gasoline Sales Tax – Excise Tax Swap In March 2010 as a part of a special budget session called by Governor Schwarzenegger, the Legislature enacted a swap of state sales taxes on gasoline for a gasoline excise t ax. Intended to be “revenue neutral,” the fuel tax swap provided the Legislature with greater flexibility in the use of funds, in particular relieving the general fund from the cost of state transportation debt service payments. The fuel tax swap:

1. Repealed the state sales tax on gasoline (local rates including the Bradley Burns are NOT affected);

2. Increased the excise tax on gasoline by 17.322 cents and added an annual adjustment mechanism intended to ensure the new excise tax provides, over time, the same amount of revenues expected from the sales tax on gas (no more, no less);

3. Increased the sales tax on diesel by 1.75 percent and allocated 75 percent to local transit agencies and 25 percent to state transit programs. The excise tax on diesel was reduced from 18 cents to 13.6 cents.

Sales tax revenues from diesel must go to transit funding.

4. Provided for a specific allocation of the funds among state and local transportation needs.

Revenues from the new Section 2103 excise tax rate are now allocated as follows:

1. State transportation debt service;

2. Remainder allocated:
a. 44 percent to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); b. 12 percent State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP); c. 44 percent evenly split between cities and counties using current HUTA formulas.

Section 2103 funds are allocated to cities on a per capita basi s and to counties 75 percent based on the proportion of registered vehicles and 25 percent based on the proportion of maintained county road miles.

City Population Annual Allocation
over 500,000 $ 20,000
100,000 to 500,000 $ 10,000
50,000 to 99.999 $ 7,500
25,000 to 49,999 $ 6,000
20,000 to 24,999 $ 5,000
15,000 to 19,999 $ 4,000
10,000 to 14,999 $ 3,000
5,000 to 9,999 $ 2,000
less than 5,000 $ 1,000
Streets & Highway Code §2107.5
Attachment C

Page 4 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

The law included expressed legislative intent to fully replace the local streets and road funds cities and counties would have received under Proposition 42 state sales tax on gasoline with allocations from the new higher motor vehicle excise tax (HUTA) rate.

However, the swap created certain revenue effects related to the timing and receipt of revenues. In particular, the law provided that the new excise tax rate be adjusted annually by the BOE to garner an amount of revenues equal to what Prop42 would have provided in the prior year. Th us, the annual Sec 2103 funds were always “looking backward.” If the Section 2103 amounts generated less than Prop42 would have, the difference was made up until the following year.

In the years following the swap, there were a number of snafus and changes in interpretation of the Section 2103 allocation. In FY2011-12 SCO allocated more money to citi es and counties and did not fully backfill state transportation programs for weight fees that were used for debt service and loans that those funds would have otherwise received. This was contrary to the Legislature’s inte ntion, but the statute was not clear. The statute was clarified in the 2013 budget to clarify the original intent of the weight fee swap to fully backfill state transportation funds. [Streets & Highways Code 2103 (a)(1)(D)].

The Section 2103 Local Streets and Roads allocation to cities and counties have varied and declined dramatically and, due to BOE’s failure to enact a rate increase in 2018, fel l to $244 million for FY2018-19, about 5 percent down from prior year.

Changes to HUTA Allocated Rates, Including the Variable Rate by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall)
In addition to increasing various fuel and motor vehicle regist ration taxes, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) removed BOE’s discretionary rate settin g role over the Section 2103 variable rate and reset the variable rate at 17.3 cents per gallon on July 1, 2019, up from the current 11.7 cents. This adjustment more than doubled Section 2103 revenue allocations for FY2019-20 over the prior year.

With regard to diesel fuel taxes, SB1 also eliminated the price-based adjustment mechanism applied to the diesel fuel tax rate.

On July 1, 2020, and every July 1 thereafter, the gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax rates including the 18 cent per gallon base rate, the 17.3 percent per gallon rate, the diesel fuel excise tax rate and vehicle registration taxes are increased by the change in the California Consumer Price Index.

Streets & Highways Code Section 2103 Variable Gas Tax Allocations to Cities and Counties

Attachment C

Page 5 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Effective Date Base Rate Sec2103 SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2015 $ 0.180 $ 0.120 $ 0.300
July 1, 2016 $ 0.180 $ 0.098 $ 0.278
July 1, 2017 $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.297
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.180 $ 0.117 $ 0.120 $ 0.417
July 1, 2019 $ 0.180 $ 0.173 $ 0.120 $ 0.473
July 1, 2020 $ 0.192 $ 0.185 $ 0.128 $ 0.505
July 1, 2021 $ 0.194 $ 0.187 $ 0.130 $ 0.511
July 1, 2022 $ 0.205 $ 0.197 $ 0.137 $ 0.539
July 1, 2023 $ 0.220 $ 0.212 $ 0.147 $ 0.579
July 1, 2024 $ 0.226 $ 0.217 $ 0.150 $ 0.593
July 1, 2025e $ 0.231 $ 0.222 $ 0.154 $ 0.607
California Gasoline Excise Tax Rates - Per Gallon
Effective Date Base Rate SB1 Rate Total
July 1, 2017 $ 0.160 $ 0.160
Nov 1, 2017* $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2019 $ 0.160 $ 0.200 $ 0.360
July 1, 2020 $ 0.171 $ 0.214 $ 0.385
July 1, 2021 $ 0.173 $ 0.216 $ 0.389
July 1, 2022 $ 0.182 $ 0.228 $ 0.410
July 1, 2023 $ 0.196 $ 0.245 $ 0.441
July 1, 2024 $ 0.201 $ 0.250 $ 0.451
July 1, 2025e $ 0.206 $ 0.256 $ 0.462
California Diesel Excise Tax Rates
Attachment C

Page 6 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Use of Funds: HUTA
The use of local Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds is restricted by Article XIX of the California State Constitution and by Streets and Highways Code Section 2101. All Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds allocated from the Highway Users Tax Account must be expended for the following:
(a) The research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways (and their related public facilities for nonmotorized traffic), including the mitigation of their e n v i r o n m e n t a l e f f e c t s , t h e p a y m e n t f o r p r o p e r t y t a k e n o r d a m a g ed for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes. (b) The research and planning for exclusive public mass transi t guideways (and their related fixed facilities), the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
(c) The construction and improvement of exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), including the mitigat ion of their environmental ef f e c t s , t h e p a y m e n t f o r p r o p e r t y t a k e n o r damaged for such purposes, the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes, and the maintenance of the structures and the immediate right-of-way for the public mass transit guideways. (d) The payment of principal and interest on voter-approved bo nds issued for the purposes specified above.

Three Year State General Fund TCRF Loan Repayment Funds SB1 stipulated the repayment of $706 million by the state General Fund to transportation funds over three fiscal years: 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. Under SB1, $75 million wa s all ocat ed t o l ocal s tree ts and r oads f rom repayments of Transportation Congestion Relief Funds (TCRF) in each of these three years. These funds were allocated half to cities and half to counties with the city fun ds allocated among cities on a per capita basis, the county funds allocated among counties based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage.

These TCRF revenues may be deposited in local HUTA funds.3 However, these TCRF funds carry slightly different use requirements than HUTA funds. TCRF funds may be expended on ly for street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction or storm damage repair. For these purposes,  “Maintenance” means patching and/or overlay and sealing.  “Reconstruction” includes any overlay, sealing or widening of the roadway, if the widening is necessary to bring the roadway width to the state minimum standards, but does not include widening for the purpose of traffic capacity.
 “Storm damage repair” is repair or reconstruction of local stre ets and highways and related drainage improvements that have been damaged due to winter storms and flooding, and construction of drainage improvements to mitigate future roadway flooding and damage problems, in those jurisdictions that have been declared disaster areas by the President of the United States.

3 Note that the “loan repayment” is between the state general fund and state transportation funds. From an accounting standpoint this is NOT a debt repayment to local agencies, it is simply revenue.

Attachment C

Page 7 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
Revenue Allocations – Streets & Highways Code Sec 2031 “RMRA” The Road Repair and Accountabilit y Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) repr esented a significant additional investment in California’s transportation systems of over $5 billion per year . The Act increased per gallon fuel excise taxes, diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration taxes, stabili zed the problematic price-based fuel tax rates and provided for inflationary adjustments to rates in future years. The Act is more than doubling local streets and road funds allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUT A) and through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which it established.

The RMRA receives funds4 from the following new taxes imposed under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017:
 A 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017.  A 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017, half of which will be allocated to Trade Corridors Enhancement Account (TCEA) with the remaining half to the RMRA.  A new vehicle registration tax called the “transportation improvement fee,” effective January 1, 2018, based on the market value of the vehicle.
 An additional new $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emission vehicles model year 2020 and later effective July 1, 2020.
 Annual rate increases to these taxes every July 1 (January 1 for the registration fees) for the change in the California Consumer Price Index. The first adjustment made on July 1, 2020 covered CPI change for two years: November 1, 2017 through November 12, 2019.

4 In addition, funds from a 4 percent increase in the diesel sales tax to 5.75 percent from the prior 1.75 percent effective November 1, 2017 are allocated to the Public Transportation Account.

Vehicle Value Jan 2018 Jan 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022 Jan 2023 Jan 2024 Jan 2025 0 - $4,999 $ 25 $ 27 $ 27 $ 28 $ 29 $ 32 $ 32
$5,000 - $24,999 $ 52 $ 54 $ 55 $ 56 $ 59 $ 65 $ 65 $25,000 - $34,999 $ 105 $ 107 $ 110 $ 112 $ 118 $ 129 $ 129 $35,000 - $59,999 $ 157 $ 161 $ 165 $ 168 $ 177 $ 194 $ 194 $60,000 & over $ 183 $ 188 $ 192 $ 196 $ 206 $ 227 $ 227 Jan 2020
Jan 2021 Jan 2022 Jan 2023 Jan 2024 Jan 2025
ZEV vehicle* $ 100 $ 101 $ 103 $ 108 $ 118 $ 118
SB1 Transportation Improvement Fee
SB1 Road Improvement Fee (RIF)
Attachment C

Page 8 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

The Road Repair and Accountability Act directs the State Controller to allocate, on a monthly basis, fifty percent of the revenues in the RMRA to the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOP) in the State Highway Account and half to cities and counties. But there are a series of specific program allocations, subject to appropriation in the annual state budget, to be taken out first:

1. Administrative costs.

2. $200 million for the State-Local-Partnership Program for existing and aspiring self-help jurisdictions.

3. $100 million annually for the Active Transportation Program for the purpose of encouraging increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking.

4. $400 million for state bridge and culvert maintenance and rehabilitation.

5. $25 million for the state’s Freeway Service Patrol program.

6. $5 million for five years through FY 2021-22 for pre-apprenticeship training programs of the California Workforce Development Board.

7. $25 million for local planning grants to encourage local and regional planning.

8. $7 million for transportation research and transportation-related workforce education, training, and development including $5 million to the University of California and $2 million to the California State University.

15.0 25.0
Attachment C

Page 9 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Use of Funds: RMRA
[Streets and Highways Code Section 2030]
The use of RMRA local streets and roads funds is similar but, not identical, to HUTA use rules. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2030, R MRA local streets and roads al l oc a t i on s m u s t b e u s e d f or p r oj e c t s “t h a t include, but are not limited to,” the following
 Road maintenance and rehabilitation
 Safety projects
 Railroad grade separations
 Traffic control devices
 Complete street components, “including active transportation pu rposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm-water capt ure projects in conjunction with any other allowable project.”
RMRA funds may also be used to satisfy a match requirement for projects eligible for state or federal funds.

SB1 also contains non-obligatory intent language regarding the use of funds. “To the extent possible and cost effective,” cities and counties are to use a use:
 advanced recycling techniques that reduce greenhouse gas emissions;  automotive technologies, ZEV fueling, infrastructure-to-vehicle;  communications autonomous vehicle systems;
 resiliency re climate change, fires, floods, sea level rise; and  complete street elements, access for bicycles, pedestrians.

Attachment C

Page 10 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

If a city or county has an average Pavement Condition Index tha t meets or exceeds 80, the city or county may spend its RMRA funds on transportation priorities other than these. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2037] Maintenance of Effort: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2036] The Road Repair and Accountability Act contains a local agency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds allocated through the RMRA. The Act states tha t the MOE requirement is to ensure that these new roads funds do not supplant existing levels of city and cou nty general revenue spending on streets and roads. The MOE for the receipt of RMRA funds state that a city or county must maintain general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than average of 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 years. In making this calculation an agency may exclude one-time funds. A city or county that fails to comply in a particular year may make it up with in additional expenditures in the following year.

The Act provides that the State Controller may perform audits t o ensure compliance with these MOE rules. If the State Controller determines that a city or county has not m et its MOE, the agency will be required to reimburse the state for the funds it received during that fiscal year. However, a city or county that fails to comply in a particular fiscal year may expend during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is sufficient to comply. Any funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply will be reapportioned to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in compliance.

For further guidance, see the State Controller’s “ Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties.”
Spending Plans and Reports: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034] The Road Repair and Accountability Act stipulates that, prior t o receiving RMRA funds in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a project list pursuant to an adopted budget. The list must include for each project: description, location, schedule, useful life. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034(a)]
The Road Repair and Accountability Act also requires that a city or county submit to the CTC an annual report of project completion in order to receive RMRA funds. The report must include descriptions of all projects for which RMRA funds were expended including: description, location, funds expended, completion date, estimated useful life of the project.

Budgeting and Accounting for RMRA Funds: The ~60 Day Delay The allocation of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account ( RMRA) revenues to cities and counties takes many weeks. It takes the State Controller’s Office roughly 30 to 60 days from the time of revenue collection by t h e s t a t e , t h r o u g h t h e v a r i o u s s t a t u t o r y s e t a s i d e s t o d i s t r i b ute the funds to cities and counties in monthly allocations. Consequently, the estimates shown in this report a re for revenues collected for July through June are not received on a cash basis by local agencies until Septem ber through August. That is, for example, the FY2022-23 figure for your agency is revenues collected in and for July 2022 through June 2023 but distributed in monthly allocations September 2022 through August 2023. Cities and counties thus have two choices in the budgeting and accounting of RMRA revenues:
1) apply a 60 day accrual policy to RMRA funds (recommended); or 2) adjust RMRA budgets (especially in FY2017-18) to reflect a distributed cash basis.

Attachment C

Page 11 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Local Streets and Roads (HUTA and RMRA) Revenue Estimates for FY2024-25 and FY2025-26
We have computed revenue estimates for each city and county using a model reflecting the local allocation formulas, latest population figures used by the State Controller for allocations and estimates by the state Department of Finance (DOF) of statewide HUTA and RMRA tax revenues provided with the Governor’s Proposed 2025-26 Budget (released January 10, 2025) and analyses of SB1(Beall), The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

Fuel consumption was sharply down during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic but has largely recovered to its prior, slightly declining trajectory. Recently, fuel prices have increased steeply but the price of fuel no longer has a direct effect on local streets and roads revenues because all rates are per gallon, regardless of price.

Despite lower fuel consumption, scheduled rate increases stipulated in SB1 have kept local allocations of revenue growing at a modest pace. Total LSR allocations (including HUTA, TCRF, and RMRA) were up 6.7 percent in 2022-23 and 11.8 percent in 2023-24. Nevertheless, as fuel consumption gradually declines, revenue growth will soften. The Department of Finance projects total LSR allocations to cities and counties in 2024-25 will be 2.3 percent above FY 2023-24. For the budget year FY2025-26, DOF estimates total statewide local streets and roads allocations will grow 1.9 percent.

HUTA (Highway Users Tax Account)
HUTA revenues are allocated to cities and counties pursuant to Sections 2103-2107 of the Streets and Highways Code. The per gallon excise tax rates that provide HUTA revenues are adjusted annually on July 1 as described above. Revenue changes depend on the combined effects of 1) these rate adjustments, 2) taxable gallonage, and 3) the relative change of statutory transfers including the “weight fee offset” that pays state transportation bond debt.

Sec2103-2108 HUTA allocations (not including RMRA) grew 12.3 percent in FY2023-24 largely reflecting the post-pandemic economic recovery. HUTA revenue growth is now flattening and will begin to decline in a few Source: California Department of Finance
Attachment C

Page 12 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

years. DOF estimates 0.54 percent HUTA growth in current year FY2024-25, leveling off to 0.03 percent growth in budget year FY2024-25.

RMRA (Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account)5
The Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB1) taxes that provide funding to cities and counties through the RMRA began on November 1, 2017 when the new per-gallon fuel excise taxes took effect. It also includes allocations from the SB1 vehicle registration tax (“Transportation Improvement Fee”) and the zero emission vehicle registration tax (“Road Improvement Fee”).

DOF estimates FY2024-25 RMRA revenues will be 2.3 percent higher than FY2023-24 actuals and that FY2025- 26 revenues will grow by 1.9 percent over the current year.

Why does city/county RMRA growth differ from city/county HUTA growth? Under SB1, various fixed-amount statutory allocations are made from the new SB1 tax rates prior to the city and county allocations. In addition, the $1.3 million and growing “weight fee transfer” that is used to pay state transportation debt service is projected to grow more than the modest growth in HUTA revenues impacting the local allocations which follow.

California Local Streets and Roads Program - State Funds to Cities and Counties

Looking Ahead: Long Term Estimates of Local Streets and Roads Funding Since the recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, we have seen modest year over year growth in local streets and roads revenues. In future years, as alternative fuel vehicles come more into use, fuel consumption will continue to decline. The SB1 annual cost of living adjustments will help to maintain revenues but we will see decline in revenue growth to below the rate of inflation.

Due to complicated statutory transfers from these revenues before the city and county allocations are made (including the $1.3 billion transfer for state transportation debt service), actual growth in funding allocated to cities and counties varies somewhat among the various categories of local streets and roads allocations and

5 Note that RMRA revenues are delayed 60 days from collection to allocation. That is, the revenues for a July 1 to June 30 fisca l year are allocated September 1 through August 31. These are spendable in the fiscal year because your accounting staff “accrues” them back into your fiscal year.
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY12-13FY13-14FY14-15FY15-16FY16-17FY17-18FY18-19FY19-20FY20-21 FY21-22FY22-23FY23-24FY24-25FY25-26FY26-27FY27-28FY28-29FY28-30 Millions
§2103
cities,
counties
§2104
counties
§2106
§2107
cities
estimated projected > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > R.M.R.A.

TCRF loan
repayment
H.U.T.A.
§2105
cities,
counties
Attachment C

Page 13 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

will not exactly mirror total tax collections. Taking all these factors into account, for the purposes of long-term transportation program planning, we estimate transportation allocations to cities and counties will increase in outyears at the following growth rates:

Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
Long-term, in addition to the growth in statewide local streets and roads revenue collections, the allocations to each particular city will be primarily related to changes in the city’s population relative to the change in state population in cities. The current forecast for California population, provided by the Demographics Unit of the California Department of Finance is as follows:6

If you think your city’s population growth will be significantly different from the statewide average in cities, then you should adjust accordingly. For example, the City of Buenavida’s planning department estimates the city will see average annual residential population growth of 1.5 percent annually over the next ten years. The city’s estimated HUTA 2105 allocation for FY2025-26 is $381,200. The long term projection of Section 2105 revenue would be:
$381,200 x Sec2105 growth x Buenavida Population Growth ÷ Statewide City Population Growth So, for 2026-27, the city would estimate $381,200 x 1.007 x 1.015 ÷ 1.0019 = $389,057 And long term …

6 See http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/projections/ . California population in cities estimated by author based on recent historic trend of proportion of population in cities.

Estimated Annual Revenue Growth Rate over prior year
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30
HUTA 2103 -1.7% -1.5% -2.1% -3.2% -4.0%
HUTA 2104 0.8% 0.7% 1.0% 0.1% -0.1%
HUTA 2105 0.8% 0.7% 1.0% 0.1% -0.1%
HUTA 2106 1.3% 1.1% 1.0% 0.1% -0.1%
HUTA 2107 0.8% 0.7% 1.0% 0.1% -0.1%
RMRA 3.9% 5.6% 5.5% 4.3% 5.4%
California 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Population 39,185,605 38,990,487 38,991,721 39,024,054 39,068,081 39,131,779 39,213,804 39,323,647 39,430,871 39,532,028 …... in Cities 32,713,003 33,118,970 33,120,018 33,182,482 33,219,919 33,274,082 33,343,828 33,437,229 33,528,402 33,614,417 percent change 1.24% 0.00% 0.19% 0.11% 0.16% 0.21% 0.28% 0.27% 0.26% 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040
Population 39,626,155 39,719,558 39,800,683 39,872,787 39,936,372 39,991,277 40,037,385 40,076,005 40,106,449 Population in Cities 33,694,454 33,773,875 33,842,856 33,904,167 33,958,234 34,004,920 34,044,126 34,076,965 34,102,852 percent change 0.24% 0.24% 0.20% 0.18% 0.16% 0.14% 0.12% 0.10% 0.08% City of Buenavida EXAMPLE
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 HUTA Sec2015 381,200$
2105 growth 0.7% 1.0% 0.1% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
Buenavida pop 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5%
Cities pop 0.19% 0.11% 0.16% 0.21% 0.28% 0.27%
HUTA Sec2015 389,057$ 398,265$ 403,854 $ 408,633 $ 413,605 $ 418,679 $ Attachment C

Page 14 of 14 ends

CaliforniaCityFinance.com

Changes for in allocations to an individual county will be affected by many things including: the population of the county relative to the total population of the state, proportion of population in the unincorporated area of the county, as well as relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles.

mjgc

ATTACHMENTS:

A) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2024-25 B) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues – FY2025-26 C) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2024-25 (from CSAC) D) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues – FY2025-26 (from CSAC) Attachment C

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 725,463 495,191 276,179 675,665 7,500 2,179,998 1,979,466 4,159,464 ALBANY 195,910 133,726 78,086 182,462 5,000 595,184 534,552 1,129,736 BERKELEY 1,180,403 805,727 446,362 1,099,376 10,000 3,541,868 3,220,795 6,762,663 DUBLIN 689,012 470,311 262,544 641,716 7,500 2,071,083 1,880,009 3,951,092 EMERYVILLE 123,204 84,097 50,888 114,747 3,000 375,936 336,169 712,104 FREMONT 2,129,324 1,453,448 801,332 1,983,160 10,000 6,377,264 5,809,979 12,187,244 HAYWARD 1,517,876 1,036,082 572,603 1,413,684 10,000 4,550,245 4,141,610 8,691,855 LIVERMORE 812,133 554,351 308,601 756,386 7,500 2,438,970 2,215,950 4,654,920 NEWARK 439,098 299,722 169,056 408,957 6,000 1,322,833 1,198,102 2,520,935 OAKLAND 4,008,224 2,735,961 1,504,186 3,733,087 10,000 11,991,457 10,936,663 22,928,121 PIEDMONT 104,271 71,174 43,805 97,113 3,000 319,363 284,509 603,872 PLEASANTON 738,483 504,079 281,050 687,791 7,500 2,218,902 2,014,991 4,233,893 SAN LEANDRO 841,384 574,318 319,543 783,629 7,500 2,526,373 2,295,763 4,822,136 UNION CITY 648,611 442,733 247,431 604,088 7,500 1,950,362 1,769,771 3,720,133

ALPINE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,851 1,263 5,712 1,724 1,000 11,549 5,050 16,599 IONE 81,951 55,939 45,162 76,325 2,000 261,377 223,607 484,984 JACKSON 46,555 31,778 27,729 43,360 2,000 151,422 127,029 278,451 PLYMOUTH 9,874 6,740 9,663 9,196 1,000 36,472 26,941 63,413 SUTTER CREEK 24,467 16,701 16,850 22,787 1,000 81,805 66,759 148,564

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 18,165 12,399 12,226 16,918 1,000 60,708 49,564 110,273 CHICO 1,014,104 692,214 419,373 944,493 10,000 3,080,184 2,767,040 5,847,225 GRIDLEY 67,793 46,274 32,514 63,139 2,000 211,720 184,976 396,696 OROVILLE 185,157 126,386 80,494 172,448 4,000 568,485 505,212 1,073,697 PARADISE 98,931 67,529 45,244 101,423 2,000 315,128 269,940 585,068

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 33,795 23,068 29,550 31,475 1,000 118,887 92,210 211,097

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 59,659 40,722 21,208 55,563 2,000 179,152 162,782 341,934 WILLIAMS 51,303 35,018 18,910 47,781 2,000 155,012 139,982 294,994 Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16
Attachment C

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 1,070,024 730,385 435,356 996,575 10,000 3,242,340 2,919,622 6,161,962 BRENTWOOD 599,742 409,376 246,124 558,574 7,500 1,821,316 1,636,429 3,457,745 CLAYTON 102,383 69,885 45,997 95,355 3,000 316,620 279,358 595,978 CONCORD 1,161,525 792,842 472,174 1,081,794 10,000 3,518,336 3,169,286 6,687,622 DANVILLE 404,082 275,821 167,394 376,344 6,000 1,229,641 1,102,559 2,332,200 EL CERRITO 240,402 164,095 101,533 223,900 6,000 735,930 655,950 1,391,881 HERCULES 241,179 164,626 101,846 224,624 6,000 738,275 658,071 1,396,346 LAFAYETTE 235,275 160,596 99,470 219,125 6,000 720,467 641,962 1,362,429 MARTINEZ 347,375 237,113 144,577 323,530 6,000 1,058,595 947,832 2,006,427 MORAGA 160,117 109,294 69,228 149,126 4,000 491,764 436,888 928,652 OAKLEY 423,227 288,889 175,098 394,176 6,000 1,287,391 1,154,800 2,442,191 ORINDA 180,642 123,304 77,487 168,242 4,000 553,673 492,891 1,046,564 PINOLE 175,219 119,602 75,305 163,191 4,000 537,317 478,095 1,015,412 PITTSBURG 705,558 481,605 288,702 657,126 7,500 2,140,491 1,925,155 4,065,646 PLEASANT HILL 319,364 217,994 133,306 297,442 6,000 974,105 871,402 1,845,507 RICHMOND 1,072,504 732,077 436,354 998,884 10,000 3,249,820 2,926,388 6,176,209 SAN PABLO 298,016 203,421 124,715 277,559 6,000 909,711 813,152 1,722,864 SAN RAMON 782,854 534,366 319,805 729,117 7,500 2,373,642 2,136,062 4,509,703 WALNUT CREEK 650,591 444,085 266,585 605,932 7,500 1,974,693 1,775,174 3,749,867

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 62,296 42,522 25,146 58,020 2,000 189,984 169,978 359,962

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 100,125 68,344 70,292 94,844 3,000 336,605 273,197 609,802 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 198,251 135,324 134,476 2,140,057 5,000 2,613,108 540,940 3,154,048 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16
Attachment C

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 1,167,198 796,714 405,162 1,087,078 10,000 3,466,151 3,184,764 6,650,915 COALINGA 166,918 113,936 62,055 155,461 4,000 502,370 455,446 957,816 FIREBAUGH 77,870 53,153 31,510 72,525 2,000 237,058 212,472 449,530 FOWLER 68,172 46,533 28,184 63,493 2,000 208,382 186,011 394,393 FRESNO 5,061,508 3,454,919 1,740,956 4,714,071 20,000 14,991,454 13,810,609 28,802,063 HURON 58,743 40,097 24,949 54,710 2,000 180,499 160,282 340,781 KERMAN 159,682 108,997 59,573 148,721 4,000 480,972 435,701 916,673 KINGSBURG 120,687 82,379 46,197 112,403 3,000 364,666 329,301 693,966 MENDOTA 116,458 79,493 44,746 108,464 3,000 352,161 317,762 669,923 ORANGE COVE 88,993 60,745 35,326 82,884 2,000 269,948 242,822 512,770 PARLIER 134,799 92,012 51,038 125,546 3,000 406,394 367,806 774,200 REEDLEY 237,385 162,036 86,226 221,090 6,000 712,738 647,719 1,360,457 SANGER 245,899 167,847 89,146 229,019 6,000 737,911 670,948 1,408,860 SAN JOAQUIN 34,220 23,358 16,538 31,871 1,000 106,988 93,372 200,359 SELMA 228,687 156,099 83,242 212,989 5,000 686,017 623,985 1,310,001

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 78,999 53,924 28,687 73,576 2,000 237,186 215,553 452,739 WILLOWS 59,177 40,394 22,694 55,115 2,000 179,380 161,469 340,849

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 171,628 117,151 78,916 159,847 4,000 531,543 468,298 999,841 BLUE LAKE 11,151 7,611 9,615 10,385 1,000 39,763 30,425 70,188 EUREKA 249,591 170,367 112,583 232,458 6,000 771,000 681,023 1,452,023 FERNDALE 12,900 8,805 10,371 12,014 1,000 45,090 35,197 80,287 FORTUNA 115,949 79,145 54,871 107,990 3,000 360,955 316,373 677,328 RIO DELL 31,370 21,413 18,347 29,217 1,000 101,346 85,595 186,941 TRINIDAD 2,841 1,939 6,027 2,646 1,000 14,453 7,752 22,204

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 262,296 179,040 111,885 244,291 6,000 803,512 715,690 1,519,202 CALEXICO 363,319 247,997 153,128 338,380 6,000 1,108,823 991,336 2,100,159 CALIPATRIA 60,464 41,272 29,485 56,313 2,000 189,534 164,979 354,512 EL CENTRO 415,973 283,937 174,624 387,419 6,000 1,267,953 1,135,004 2,402,957 HOLTVILLE 51,663 35,265 25,892 48,117 2,000 162,937 140,967 303,904 IMPERIAL 204,886 139,853 88,447 190,822 5,000 629,008 559,044 1,188,051 WESTMORLAND 18,970 12,949 12,545 17,668 1,000 63,131 51,761 114,892

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 35,673 24,350 19,998 33,224 1,000 114,245 97,336 211,581 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16
Attachment C

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 182,862 124,820 54,431 170,310 4,000 536,423 498,950 1,035,374 BAKERSFIELD 3,804,282 2,596,752 1,037,324 3,543,144 10,000 10,991,502 10,380,195 21,371,697 CALIFORNIA CITY 138,972 94,861 42,519 129,433 4,000 409,784 379,193 788,977 DELANO 485,671 331,513 136,617 452,333 7,500 1,413,634 1,325,182 2,738,816 MARICOPA 9,494 6,481 7,377 8,843 1,000 33,194 25,906 59,100 MCFARLAND 131,255 89,593 40,424 122,245 3,000 386,516 358,135 744,651 RIDGECREST 258,549 176,482 74,973 240,801 6,000 756,804 705,464 1,462,268 SHAFTER 205,673 140,390 60,622 191,555 5,000 603,239 561,190 1,164,429 TAFT 79,314 54,138 26,327 73,869 2,000 235,648 216,411 452,059 TEHACHAPI 120,678 82,373 37,553 112,394 3,000 355,998 329,276 685,273 WASCO 250,896 171,258 72,896 233,673 6,000 734,723 684,583 1,419,306

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 129,376 88,310 42,109 120,495 3,000 383,290 353,010 736,300 CORCORAN 200,185 136,644 62,528 186,444 5,000 590,801 546,217 1,137,018 HANFORD 548,615 374,477 163,006 510,957 7,500 1,604,555 1,496,927 3,101,482 LEMOORE 250,146 170,746 76,935 232,975 6,000 736,803 682,538 1,419,341

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 156,110 106,559 61,004 145,394 4,000 473,067 425,955 899,022 LAKEPORT 46,102 31,469 21,398 42,937 1,000 142,906 125,792 268,698

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 150,215 102,535 48,987 201,921 4,000 507,658 409,871 917,530

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 187,221 127,795 76,271 174,370 5,000 570,656 510,843 1,081,499 ALHAMBRA 764,550 521,872 296,665 712,069 7,500 2,302,656 2,086,119 4,388,775 ARCADIA 526,323 359,261 205,722 490,195 7,500 1,589,001 1,436,102 3,025,102 ARTESIA 151,733 103,571 62,724 141,318 4,000 463,345 414,012 877,357 AVALON 31,861 21,748 16,963 29,674 1,000 101,244 86,933 188,177 AZUSA 464,989 317,396 182,308 433,071 7,500 1,405,264 1,268,750 2,674,014 BALDWIN PARK 666,600 455,012 259,272 620,842 7,500 2,009,227 1,818,855 3,828,082 BELL 315,866 215,606 125,381 294,184 6,000 957,037 861,858 1,818,895 BELLFLOWER 729,710 498,091 283,364 679,621 7,500 2,198,286 1,991,055 4,189,341 BELL GARDENS 365,438 249,443 144,305 340,353 6,000 1,105,539 997,118 2,102,658 BEVERLY HILLS 302,587 206,542 120,312 281,816 6,000 917,257 825,625 1,742,882 BRADBURY 8,513 5,811 8,050 7,929 1,000 31,304 23,229 54,533 BURBANK 991,729 676,941 383,389 923,654 10,000 2,985,713 2,705,988 5,691,700 CALABASAS 214,917 146,700 86,844 200,165 5,000 653,626 586,414 1,240,040 CARSON 868,136 592,578 336,208 808,545 7,500 2,612,968 2,368,759 4,981,726 CERRITOS 456,772 311,787 179,171 425,418 6,000 1,379,148 1,246,328 2,625,476 CLAREMONT 354,732 242,135 140,218 330,382 6,000 1,073,466 967,905 2,041,371 COMMERCE 114,515 78,166 48,516 106,654 3,000 350,850 312,460 663,310 COMPTON 889,198 606,955 344,248 828,161 7,500 2,676,061 2,426,226 5,102,287 COVINA 474,715 324,034 186,021 442,129 7,500 1,434,399 1,295,287 2,729,686 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16
Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2024-25 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2025 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code TOTAL CUDAHY 210,735 143,845 85,247 196,269 5,000 641,096 575,001 1,216,097 CULVER CITY 374,174 255,406 147,640 348,489 6,000 1,131,708 1,020,954 2,152,662 DIAMOND BAR 508,537 347,121 198,932 473,630 7,500 1,535,720 1,387,573 2,923,293 DOWNEY 1,054,164 719,558 407,223 981,803 10,000 3,172,748 2,876,344 6,049,092 DUARTE 218,906 149,422 88,367 203,879 5,000 665,574 597,296 1,262,870 EL MONTE 1,010,023 689,429 390,373 940,692 10,000 3,040,517 2,755,905 5,796,423 EL SEGUNDO 160,209 109,357 65,959 149,212 4,000 488,738 437,140 925,878 GARDENA 563,597 384,704 219,951 524,910 7,500 1,700,662 1,537,806 3,238,468 GLENDALE 1,812,782 1,237,381 696,824 1,688,347 10,000 5,445,335 4,946,278 10,391,613 GLENDORA 485,857 331,639 190,274 452,506 7,500 1,467,776 1,325,687 2,793,463 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 129,052 88,089 54,065 120,194 3,000 394,400 352,126 746,526 HAWTHORNE 814,243 555,791 315,634 758,351 7,500 2,451,519 2,221,707 4,673,226 HERMOSA BEACH 182,391 124,497 74,427 169,871 4,000 555,186 497,663 1,052,848 HIDDEN HILLS 15,981 10,909 10,901 14,884 1,000 53,675 43,605 97,280 HUNTINGTON PARK 506,307 345,599 198,081 471,553 7,500 1,529,040 1,381,488 2,910,527 INDUSTRY 3,988 2,722 6,323 3,715 1,000 17,748 10,882 28,630 INGLEWOOD 1,004,129 685,405 388,123 935,202 10,000 3,022,859 2,739,822 5,762,681 IRWINDALE 13,881 9,475 10,099 12,928 1,000 47,382 37,874 85,256 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 190,080 129,746 77,363 177,033 5,000 579,222 518,645 1,097,867 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 52,320 35,713 24,773 48,729 2,000 163,536 142,759 306,295 LAKEWOOD 761,515 519,800 295,506 709,242 7,500 2,293,564 2,077,837 4,371,400 LA MIRADA 456,291 311,458 178,988 424,970 6,000 1,377,706 1,245,015 2,622,722 LANCASTER 1,620,111 1,105,866 623,272 1,508,902 10,000 4,868,151 4,420,563 9,288,714 LA PUENTE 351,715 240,076 139,066 327,572 6,000 1,064,429 959,674 2,024,102 LA VERNE 300,098 204,843 119,361 279,498 6,000 909,800 818,833 1,728,633 LAWNDALE 294,064 200,724 117,058 273,879 6,000 891,725 802,371 1,694,096 LOMITA 193,689 132,210 78,740 180,394 5,000 590,033 528,492 1,118,525 LONG BEACH 4,296,347 2,932,630 1,644,916 4,001,433 10,000 12,885,326 11,722,824 24,608,150 LOS ANGELES 36,075,903 24,624,934 13,776,656 33,599,542 20,000 108,097,034 98,435,121 206,532,155 LYNWOOD 634,360 433,006 246,965 590,816 7,500 1,912,646 1,730,887 3,643,533 MALIBU 99,348 67,813 42,726 92,528 3,000 305,415 271,076 576,491 MANHATTAN BEACH 328,155 223,994 130,072 305,629 6,000 993,850 895,389 1,889,239 MAYWOOD 232,527 158,720 93,566 216,566 6,000 707,379 634,463 1,341,842 MONROVIA 352,446 240,575 139,345 328,253 6,000 1,066,619 961,668 2,028,287 MONTEBELLO 579,800 395,764 226,137 540,001 7,500 1,749,202 1,582,017 3,331,219 MONTEREY PARK 565,281 385,853 220,594 526,478 7,500 1,705,707 1,542,401 3,248,108 NORWALK 956,963 653,210 370,117 891,274 10,000 2,881,564 2,611,126 5,492,690 PALMDALE 1,566,476 1,069,256 602,797 1,458,949 10,000 4,707,478 4,274,219 8,981,697 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 123,555 84,337 51,967 115,074 3,000 377,934 337,128 715,062 PARAMOUNT 494,768 337,722 193,676 460,805 7,500 1,494,471 1,350,002 2,844,473 PASADENA 1,295,500 884,291 499,353 1,206,573 10,000 3,895,718 3,534,845 7,430,562 PICO RIVERA 574,951 392,454 224,286 535,485 7,500 1,734,676 1,568,787 3,303,462 POMONA 1,413,874 965,091 544,542 1,316,821 10,000 4,250,328 3,857,833 8,108,161 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 390,590 266,611 153,906 363,778 6,000 1,180,886 1,065,746 2,246,631 REDONDO BEACH 649,804 443,548 252,861 605,200 7,500 1,958,913 1,773,028 3,731,941 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16
Attachment C

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 178,319 121,718 49,039 166,079 4,000 519,154 486,553 1,005,707 MADERA 615,927 420,423 157,604 573,648 7,500 1,775,101 1,680,590 3,455,691

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 19,655 13,416 13,177 18,306 1,000 65,554 53,629 119,184 CORTE MADERA 94,490 64,497 45,074 88,004 3,000 295,065 257,820 552,885 FAIRFAX 70,282 47,973 34,756 65,458 2,000 220,469 191,768 412,237 LARKSPUR 121,038 82,619 56,390 112,730 3,000 375,778 330,260 706,038 MILL VALLEY 130,764 89,258 60,535 121,788 3,000 405,346 356,797 762,143 NOVATO 491,982 335,821 214,497 458,211 7,500 1,508,012 1,342,402 2,850,414 ROSS 21,617 14,755 14,014 20,133 1,000 71,518 58,982 130,501 SAN ANSELMO 118,309 80,756 55,227 110,188 3,000 367,479 322,812 690,290 SAN RAFAEL 570,000 389,075 247,751 530,874 7,500 1,745,200 1,555,278 3,300,478 SAUSALITO 65,877 44,967 32,879 61,355 2,000 207,078 179,749 386,827 TIBURON 84,514 57,688 40,822 78,713 2,000 263,737 230,601 494,339

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 66,432 45,346 33,157 61,872 2,000 208,808 181,264 390,072 POINT ARENA 4,257 2,906 6,617 3,965 1,000 18,744 11,615 30,358 UKIAH 153,630 104,866 70,379 143,084 4,000 475,959 419,188 895,147 WILLITS 45,778 31,248 24,341 42,636 1,000 145,002 124,908 269,910

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 293,870 200,592 94,088 273,698 6,000 868,248 801,841 1,670,088 DOS PALOS 53,625 36,604 21,093 49,944 2,000 163,267 146,319 309,586 GUSTINE 56,253 38,398 21,892 52,392 2,000 170,935 153,490 324,425 LIVINGSTON 132,198 90,237 44,967 123,124 3,000 393,526 360,711 754,237 LOS BANOS 438,801 299,520 138,123 408,681 6,000 1,291,126 1,197,294 2,488,420 MERCED 849,833 580,084 263,009 791,497 7,500 2,491,924 2,318,816 4,810,739

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 25,170 17,181 14,115 28,789 1,000 86,255 68,678 154,933

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 66,812 45,605 63,977 1,783,156 2,000 1,961,549 182,300 2,143,849 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16
Attachment C

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 29,316 20,011 13,373 27,303 1,000 91,003 79,990 170,993 DEL REY OAKS 14,612 9,974 9,073 13,609 1,000 48,267 39,869 88,136 GONZALES 79,101 53,993 27,933 73,671 2,000 236,697 215,831 452,528 GREENFIELD 190,265 129,873 60,442 177,205 4,000 561,785 519,150 1,080,935 KING CITY 131,551 89,795 43,271 122,521 3,000 390,138 358,943 749,081 MARINA 210,013 143,352 66,217 195,597 5,000 620,179 573,032 1,193,211 MONTEREY 263,490 179,855 81,857 245,403 6,000 776,605 718,947 1,495,552 PACIFIC GROVE 138,602 94,608 45,334 129,088 3,000 410,631 378,183 788,815 SALINAS 1,499,443 1,023,500 443,306 1,396,516 10,000 4,372,764 4,091,313 8,464,078 SAND CITY 3,507 2,394 5,826 3,266 1,000 15,993 9,569 25,563 SEASIDE 302,883 206,744 93,377 282,092 6,000 891,096 826,433 1,717,529 SOLEDAD 254,940 174,018 79,356 237,440 6,000 751,754 695,617 1,447,371

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 201,342 137,433 68,391 187,521 5,000 599,688 549,373 1,149,061 CALISTOGA 48,462 33,079 20,106 45,135 2,000 148,782 132,230 281,012 NAPA 721,049 492,178 232,534 671,554 7,500 2,124,815 1,967,422 4,092,236 SAINT HELENA 49,933 34,084 20,571 46,505 2,000 153,093 136,245 289,338 YOUNTVILLE 27,622 18,855 13,524 25,726 1,000 86,727 75,369 162,096

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 125,943 85,967 114,893 117,298 3,000 447,101 343,642 790,743 NEVADA CITY 30,981 21,147 31,882 42,855 1,000 127,866 84,534 212,401 TRUCKEE 155,259 105,978 140,519 2,654,050 4,000 3,059,806 423,632 3,483,438 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16
Attachment C

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 479,286 327,155 212,161 446,387 7,500 1,472,489 1,307,760 2,780,249 ANAHEIM 3,205,104 2,187,762 1,391,475 2,985,096 10,000 9,779,437 8,745,306 18,524,743 BREA 441,633 301,453 195,871 411,318 6,000 1,356,275 1,205,021 2,561,295 BUENA PARK 779,264 531,915 341,945 725,773 7,500 2,386,397 2,126,265 4,512,662 COSTA MESA 1,041,033 710,595 455,199 969,573 10,000 3,186,399 2,840,516 6,026,915 CYPRESS 465,970 318,065 206,400 433,985 7,500 1,431,920 1,271,426 2,703,347 DANA POINT 306,659 209,321 137,475 285,609 6,000 945,063 836,735 1,781,798 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 528,627 360,834 233,508 492,341 7,500 1,622,810 1,442,389 3,065,199 FULLERTON 1,331,386 908,787 580,819 1,239,996 10,000 4,070,987 3,632,761 7,703,749 GARDEN GROVE 1,591,147 1,086,096 693,203 1,481,926 10,000 4,862,372 4,341,533 9,203,905 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,835,241 1,252,711 798,810 1,709,264 10,000 5,606,027 5,007,558 10,613,585 IRVINE 2,910,753 1,986,841 1,264,126 2,710,950 10,000 8,882,670 7,942,152 16,824,822 LAGUNA BEACH 212,724 145,203 96,834 198,122 5,000 657,883 580,430 1,238,313 LAGUNA HILLS 290,279 198,141 130,388 270,354 6,000 895,162 792,044 1,687,206 LAGUNA NIGUEL 596,799 407,367 263,003 555,833 7,500 1,830,502 1,628,400 3,458,902 LAGUNA WOODS 164,198 112,079 75,839 152,927 4,000 509,043 448,023 957,066 LA HABRA 580,550 396,276 255,973 540,699 7,500 1,780,997 1,584,062 3,365,059 LAKE FOREST 804,304 549,007 352,779 749,094 7,500 2,462,685 2,194,589 4,657,274 LA PALMA 144,108 98,366 67,148 134,216 4,000 447,838 393,207 841,044 LOS ALAMITOS 110,554 75,463 52,631 102,965 3,000 344,613 301,653 646,266 MISSION VIEJO 866,147 591,220 379,535 806,692 7,500 2,651,094 2,363,330 5,014,424 NEWPORT BEACH 787,453 537,505 345,489 733,400 7,500 2,411,347 2,148,610 4,559,958 ORANGE 1,301,932 888,681 568,075 1,212,563 10,000 3,981,251 3,552,393 7,533,644 PLACENTIA 483,284 329,883 213,891 450,110 7,500 1,484,668 1,318,667 2,803,336 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 443,391 302,653 196,631 412,956 6,000 1,361,631 1,209,818 2,571,449 SAN CLEMENTE 593,190 404,904 261,441 552,472 7,500 1,819,507 1,618,553 3,438,060 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 323,806 221,025 144,893 301,579 6,000 997,303 883,522 1,880,825 SANTA ANA 2,876,024 1,963,136 1,249,100 2,678,605 10,000 8,776,865 7,847,392 16,624,257 SEAL BEACH 234,100 159,794 106,083 218,031 6,000 724,007 638,756 1,362,763 STANTON 372,897 254,534 166,132 347,300 6,000 1,146,863 1,017,469 2,164,332 TUSTIN 743,461 507,477 326,456 692,428 7,500 2,277,321 2,028,575 4,305,897 VILLA PARK 54,217 37,008 28,257 50,496 2,000 171,978 147,935 319,914 WESTMINSTER 841,476 574,381 368,861 783,715 7,500 2,575,933 2,296,016 4,871,949 YORBA LINDA 629,687 429,816 277,232 586,463 7,500 1,930,698 1,718,136 3,648,833 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16
Attachment C

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 127,396 86,959 59,112 118,651 3,000 395,117 347,606 742,724 COLFAX 18,498 12,627 12,686 23,925 1,000 68,736 50,473 119,210 LINCOLN 492,584 336,231 214,800 458,771 7,500 1,509,887 1,344,043 2,853,930 LOOMIS 62,990 42,996 31,654 58,666 2,000 198,306 171,872 370,178 ROCKLIN 662,649 452,315 287,302 617,162 7,500 2,026,928 1,808,074 3,835,002 ROSEVILLE 1,428,115 974,812 613,638 1,330,085 10,000 4,356,650 3,896,692 8,253,342

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 19,535 13,334 9,209 222,035 1,000 265,112 53,301 318,413

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 288,836 197,156 127,732 269,009 6,000 888,733 788,105 1,676,838 BEAUMONT 531,311 362,666 230,933 494,840 7,500 1,627,249 1,449,711 3,076,960 BLYTHE 173,766 118,610 78,757 161,838 4,000 536,972 474,130 1,011,102 CALIMESA 100,560 68,641 47,600 93,657 3,000 313,458 274,384 587,841 CANYON LAKE 102,346 69,860 48,360 95,321 3,000 318,886 279,257 598,143 CATHEDRAL CITY 474,891 324,154 206,920 442,293 7,500 1,455,758 1,295,766 2,751,524 COACHELLA 399,510 272,700 174,837 372,087 6,000 1,225,134 1,090,086 2,315,220 CORONA 1,449,778 989,599 621,844 1,350,261 10,000 4,421,482 3,955,800 8,377,282 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 302,170 206,258 133,408 281,429 6,000 929,264 824,489 1,753,753 EASTVALE 644,844 440,162 279,254 600,580 7,500 1,972,341 1,759,494 3,731,835 HEMET 829,715 566,352 357,937 772,761 7,500 2,534,265 2,263,924 4,798,189 INDIAN WELLS 44,390 30,300 23,693 41,343 1,000 140,726 121,121 261,847 INDIO 839,126 572,776 361,943 781,526 7,500 2,562,871 2,289,602 4,852,473 JURUPA VALLEY 969,798 661,971 417,558 903,228 10,000 2,962,554 2,646,147 5,608,701 LAKE ELSINORE 661,196 451,323 286,213 615,809 7,500 2,022,042 1,804,110 3,826,151 LA QUINTA 355,065 242,362 155,920 330,692 6,000 1,090,039 968,814 2,058,853 MENIFEE 1,032,343 704,664 444,178 961,480 10,000 3,152,666 2,816,807 5,969,472 MORENO VALLEY 1,925,409 1,314,259 824,278 1,793,243 10,000 5,867,190 5,253,587 11,120,776 MURRIETA 1,024,441 699,270 440,815 954,120 10,000 3,128,645 2,795,244 5,923,889 NORCO 246,408 168,195 109,674 229,493 6,000 759,770 672,337 1,432,107 PALM DESERT 470,912 321,438 205,226 438,587 7,500 1,443,663 1,284,909 2,728,572 PALM SPRINGS 408,727 278,992 178,759 380,671 6,000 1,253,148 1,115,234 2,368,383 PERRIS 733,921 500,964 317,166 683,542 7,500 2,243,093 2,002,543 4,245,636 RANCHO MIRAGE 157,239 107,329 71,723 146,446 4,000 486,737 429,035 915,772 RIVERSIDE 2,939,199 2,006,258 1,255,760 2,737,443 10,000 8,948,660 8,019,769 16,968,429 SAN JACINTO 497,766 339,769 216,655 463,598 7,500 1,525,288 1,358,183 2,883,470 TEMECULA 1,015,418 693,111 436,975 945,717 10,000 3,101,221 2,770,626 5,871,847 WILDOMAR 339,528 231,757 149,307 316,221 6,000 1,042,814 926,420 1,969,234 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16 Attachment C

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 811,744 554,086 366,286 756,024 7,500 2,495,640 2,214,890 4,710,530 ELK GROVE 1,653,443 1,128,618 741,112 1,539,945 10,000 5,073,118 4,511,511 9,584,630 FOLSOM 814,539 555,993 367,531 758,626 7,500 2,504,190 2,222,515 4,726,705 GALT 238,607 162,870 111,057 222,228 6,000 740,761 651,052 1,391,813 ISLETON 7,357 5,022 8,076 6,852 1,000 28,306 20,073 48,379 RANCHO CORDOVA 759,812 518,638 343,160 707,657 7,500 2,336,767 2,073,191 4,409,958 SACRAMENTO 4,815,693 3,287,128 2,149,327 4,485,129 20,000 14,757,278 13,139,888 27,897,165

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 396,725 270,799 170,484 369,492 6,000 1,213,501 1,082,486 2,295,987 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 19,285 13,163 12,854 17,961 1,000 64,263 52,619 116,882

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 338,871 231,309 144,458 315,610 6,000 1,036,247 924,628 1,960,875 APPLE VALLEY 702,514 479,526 294,326 654,291 7,500 2,138,157 1,916,848 4,055,004 BARSTOW 236,284 161,284 102,179 220,065 6,000 725,813 644,714 1,370,527 BIG BEAR LAKE 46,648 31,841 24,025 1,029,526 2,000 1,134,040 127,281 1,261,321 CHINO 856,754 584,809 357,893 797,944 7,500 2,604,900 2,337,702 4,942,602 CHINO HILLS 725,287 495,071 303,711 675,501 7,500 2,207,071 1,978,986 4,186,056 COLTON 497,451 339,554 209,814 463,305 7,500 1,517,624 1,357,324 2,874,948 FONTANA 1,982,357 1,353,130 821,786 1,846,281 10,000 6,013,554 5,408,971 11,422,525 GRAND TERRACE 121,464 82,910 54,859 113,126 3,000 375,359 331,422 706,781 HESPERIA 926,176 632,195 386,503 862,600 10,000 2,817,474 2,527,122 5,344,596 HIGHLAND 526,212 359,185 221,667 490,091 7,500 1,604,655 1,435,799 3,040,454 LOMA LINDA 231,019 157,690 100,009 215,161 6,000 709,879 630,348 1,340,227 MONTCLAIR 351,798 240,133 149,786 327,650 6,000 1,075,366 959,901 2,035,267 NEEDLES 45,565 31,102 23,579 42,438 1,000 143,684 124,327 268,011 ONTARIO 1,676,993 1,144,694 695,937 1,561,879 10,000 5,089,503 4,575,771 9,665,274 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,612,486 1,100,662 669,351 1,501,800 10,000 4,894,299 4,399,758 9,294,057 REDLANDS 675,974 461,411 283,388 629,573 7,500 2,057,846 1,844,433 3,902,279 RIALTO 962,506 656,994 401,476 896,436 10,000 2,927,412 2,626,251 5,553,662 SAN BERNARDINO 2,096,344 1,430,936 868,763 1,952,444 10,000 6,358,487 5,719,991 12,078,478 TWENTYNINE PALMS 261,667 178,610 112,640 243,705 6,000 802,623 713,973 1,516,596 UPLAND 729,784 498,141 305,565 679,690 7,500 2,220,680 1,991,257 4,211,937 VICTORVILLE 1,278,881 872,947 531,863 1,191,094 10,000 3,884,785 3,489,497 7,374,282 YUCAIPA 506,224 345,542 213,429 471,475 7,500 1,544,170 1,381,260 2,925,431 YUCCA VALLEY 201,425 137,490 87,813 187,599 5,000 619,328 549,600 1,168,928 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16 Attachment C

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 1,064,444 726,576 471,728 991,378 10,000 3,264,126 2,904,396 6,168,522 CHULA VISTA 2,574,816 1,757,535 1,134,266 2,398,072 10,000 7,874,690 7,025,529 14,900,219 CORONADO 217,499 148,462 100,208 202,569 5,000 673,738 593,458 1,267,197 DEL MAR 36,561 24,956 20,838 34,052 1,000 117,407 99,760 217,167 EL CAJON 983,863 671,572 436,381 916,328 10,000 3,018,144 2,684,526 5,702,669 ENCINITAS 569,158 388,500 254,467 530,090 7,500 1,749,715 1,552,981 3,302,695 ESCONDIDO 1,399,984 955,610 618,916 1,303,885 10,000 4,288,395 3,819,934 8,108,329 IMPERIAL BEACH 245,936 167,872 112,682 229,054 6,000 761,544 671,049 1,432,593 LA MESA 561,117 383,011 250,939 522,600 7,500 1,725,167 1,531,039 3,256,206 LEMON GROVE 255,106 174,132 116,705 237,595 6,000 789,538 696,071 1,485,609 NATIONAL CITY 542,665 370,416 242,845 505,415 7,500 1,668,841 1,480,692 3,149,533 OCEANSIDE 1,603,510 1,094,535 708,194 1,493,440 10,000 4,909,679 4,375,266 9,284,945 POWAY 455,958 311,231 204,810 424,659 6,000 1,402,658 1,244,106 2,646,765 SAN DIEGO 12,819,889 8,750,686 5,628,362 11,939,892 20,000 39,158,829 34,979,784 74,138,614 SAN MARCOS 888,337 606,367 394,477 827,359 7,500 2,724,041 2,423,878 5,147,918 SANTEE 552,021 376,802 246,949 514,128 7,500 1,697,399 1,506,219 3,203,618 SOLANA BEACH 119,660 81,678 57,290 111,446 3,000 373,073 326,498 699,572 VISTA 922,807 629,896 409,598 859,463 7,500 2,829,264 2,517,931 5,347,195

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 8,087,415 5,520,362 2,056,557 7,532,269 20,000 23,216,603 22,066,963 45,283,566

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 68,885 47,020 33,144 64,156 2,000 215,204 187,955 403,159 LATHROP 342,692 233,917 145,806 319,169 6,000 1,047,585 935,056 1,982,641 LODI 615,297 419,994 257,974 573,061 7,500 1,873,826 1,678,873 3,552,700 MANTECA 841,319 574,273 350,974 783,568 7,500 2,557,635 2,295,586 4,853,221 MOUNTAIN HOUSE 218,295 149,005 95,336 203,310 5,000 670,947 595,630 1,266,577 RIPON 147,948 100,988 65,676 137,793 4,000 456,404 403,685 860,089 STOCKTON 2,963,869 2,023,098 1,224,330 2,760,420 10,000 8,981,717 8,087,083 17,068,801 TRACY 893,991 610,227 372,647 832,625 7,500 2,716,989 2,439,305 5,156,294

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 169,778 115,888 88,840 158,124 4,000 536,629 463,248 999,877 ATASCADERO 285,014 194,547 145,882 265,450 6,000 896,893 777,677 1,674,570 EL PASO DE ROBLES 290,409 198,229 148,552 270,474 6,000 913,665 792,397 1,706,062 GROVER BEACH 118,346 80,781 63,381 110,222 3,000 375,730 322,913 698,643 MORRO BAY 97,691 66,683 53,157 90,986 3,000 311,517 266,556 578,073 PISMO BEACH 74,529 50,873 41,692 69,413 2,000 238,507 203,357 441,865 SAN LUIS OBISPO 450,507 307,510 227,801 419,583 6,000 1,411,402 1,229,235 2,640,636 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16 Attachment C

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 66,460 45,365 33,429 61,898 2,000 209,152 181,340 390,493 BELMONT 260,270 177,657 116,918 242,404 6,000 803,248 710,160 1,513,409 BRISBANE 44,890 30,641 24,137 41,808 1,000 142,477 122,484 264,961 BURLINGAME 289,114 197,345 129,343 269,268 6,000 891,070 788,862 1,679,932 COLMA 13,714 9,361 10,708 12,773 1,000 47,555 37,419 84,975 DALY CITY 970,121 662,192 422,705 903,529 10,000 2,968,548 2,647,031 5,615,579 EAST PALO ALTO 277,926 189,708 124,524 258,848 6,000 857,006 758,336 1,615,342 FOSTER CITY 311,720 212,776 139,082 290,323 6,000 959,901 850,546 1,810,447 HALF MOON BAY 108,740 74,225 51,643 101,276 3,000 338,884 296,704 635,588 HILLSBOROUGH 105,242 71,837 50,136 98,018 3,000 328,234 287,160 615,393 MENLO PARK 315,968 215,675 140,911 294,279 6,000 972,833 862,136 1,834,969 MILLBRAE 215,806 147,306 97,764 200,992 5,000 666,868 588,838 1,255,706 PACIFICA 357,887 244,289 158,969 333,321 6,000 1,100,466 976,515 2,076,981 PORTOLA VALLEY 41,059 28,026 22,487 38,240 1,000 130,812 112,031 242,843 REDWOOD CITY 772,259 527,134 337,471 719,248 7,500 2,363,611 2,107,151 4,470,763 SAN BRUNO 407,172 277,930 180,200 379,223 6,000 1,250,526 1,110,992 2,361,518 SAN CARLOS 284,440 194,155 127,330 264,916 6,000 876,841 776,112 1,652,953 SAN MATEO 978,274 667,757 426,217 911,122 10,000 2,993,370 2,669,275 5,662,645 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 613,132 418,516 268,923 571,045 7,500 1,879,115 1,672,965 3,552,080 WOODSIDE 49,109 33,521 25,955 45,738 2,000 156,324 133,998 290,322

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 47,601 32,492 21,313 44,334 2,000 147,739 129,882 277,621 CARPINTERIA 121,603 83,005 46,984 113,256 3,000 367,847 331,800 699,647 GOLETA 302,235 206,302 109,644 281,489 6,000 905,670 824,666 1,730,336 GUADALUPE 80,285 54,802 32,651 74,774 2,000 244,511 219,063 463,574 LOMPOC 412,206 281,367 147,793 383,911 6,000 1,231,277 1,124,728 2,356,005 SANTA BARBARA 808,848 552,109 285,386 753,326 7,500 2,407,169 2,206,987 4,614,155 SANTA MARIA 1,023,534 698,651 359,860 953,275 10,000 3,045,319 2,792,769 5,838,089 SOLVANG 53,801 36,724 23,463 50,108 2,000 166,096 146,799 312,895 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16 Attachment C

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 404,637 276,200 167,450 376,861 6,000 1,231,148 1,104,074 2,335,222 CUPERTINO 558,350 381,122 229,238 520,023 7,500 1,696,234 1,523,489 3,219,723 GILROY 564,781 385,512 231,823 526,013 7,500 1,715,630 1,541,038 3,256,667 LOS ALTOS 291,982 199,303 122,167 271,940 6,000 891,392 796,690 1,688,082 LOS ALTOS HILLS 78,434 53,538 36,328 73,050 2,000 243,351 214,013 457,364 LOS GATOS 309,490 211,254 129,205 288,246 6,000 944,194 844,461 1,788,656 MILPITAS 756,703 516,516 308,969 704,761 7,500 2,294,449 2,064,707 4,359,156 MONTE SERENO 33,147 22,626 18,124 30,871 1,000 105,768 90,443 196,211 MORGAN HILL 429,224 292,983 177,334 399,761 6,000 1,305,301 1,171,161 2,476,462 MOUNTAIN VIEW 800,769 546,595 326,682 745,802 7,500 2,427,348 2,184,944 4,612,292 PALO ALTO 631,593 431,117 258,679 588,239 7,500 1,917,128 1,723,337 3,640,465 SAN JOSE 9,368,932 6,395,109 3,770,795 8,725,820 20,000 28,280,656 25,563,656 53,844,312 SANTA CLARA 1,221,933 834,075 495,976 1,138,056 10,000 3,700,041 3,334,113 7,034,154 SARATOGA 287,707 196,385 120,448 267,958 6,000 878,498 785,025 1,663,523 SUNNYVALE 1,458,069 995,259 590,895 1,357,983 10,000 4,412,206 3,978,424 8,390,629

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 91,232 62,274 39,138 84,970 2,000 279,614 248,932 528,546 SANTA CRUZ 598,668 408,643 230,124 557,574 7,500 1,802,510 1,633,500 3,436,010 SCOTTS VALLEY 111,683 76,233 46,835 104,017 3,000 341,768 304,733 646,501 WATSONVILLE 479,425 327,249 185,244 446,516 7,500 1,445,934 1,308,139 2,754,073

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 103,373 70,561 58,665 96,277 3,000 331,877 282,059 613,936 REDDING 867,498 592,143 456,833 807,950 7,500 2,731,924 2,367,016 5,098,940 SHASTA LAKE 95,702 65,325 54,668 89,133 3,000 307,827 261,128 568,955

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 6,829 4,662 6,426 11,278 1,000 30,195 18,634 48,829

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 7,940 5,420 8,833 7,395 1,000 30,587 21,664 52,251 DUNSMUIR 15,759 10,757 12,806 80,928 1,000 121,250 42,999 164,249 ETNA 6,330 4,320 8,015 5,895 1,000 25,560 17,270 42,831 FORT JONES 6,422 4,384 8,062 5,981 1,000 25,849 17,523 43,372 MONTAGUE 11,373 7,763 10,577 10,592 1,000 41,305 31,031 72,337 MOUNT SHASTA 29,991 20,472 20,036 179,377 1,000 250,875 81,833 332,708 TULELAKE 8,328 5,685 9,031 7,757 1,000 31,801 22,724 54,525 WEED 27,012 18,438 18,522 99,789 1,000 164,761 73,703 238,463 YREKA 72,225 49,300 41,490 77,391 2,000 242,407 197,070 439,477 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16 Attachment C

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 250,609 171,062 111,124 233,406 6,000 772,201 683,800 1,456,002 DIXON 179,550 122,558 80,976 167,225 4,000 554,309 489,911 1,044,220 FAIRFIELD 1,114,581 760,798 477,675 1,038,073 10,000 3,401,127 3,041,197 6,442,324 RIO VISTA 92,574 63,190 44,076 86,219 2,000 288,059 252,594 540,653 SUISUN CITY 272,559 186,045 120,436 253,849 6,000 838,889 743,691 1,582,581 VACAVILLE 945,997 645,725 406,151 881,061 10,000 2,888,934 2,581,206 5,470,140 VALLEJO 1,165,375 795,469 499,225 1,085,380 10,000 3,555,448 3,179,790 6,735,238

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 83,367 56,905 40,472 77,644 2,000 260,388 227,471 487,859 COTATI 70,152 47,885 34,818 65,337 2,000 220,192 191,415 411,607 HEALDSBURG 104,641 71,426 49,576 97,458 3,000 326,101 285,519 611,619 PETALUMA 553,631 377,901 241,697 515,628 7,500 1,696,356 1,510,612 3,206,969 ROHNERT PARK 407,829 278,379 179,309 379,835 6,000 1,251,352 1,112,785 2,364,137 SANTA ROSA 1,647,706 1,124,702 709,848 1,534,602 10,000 5,026,858 4,495,857 9,522,714 SEBASTOPOL 69,616 47,519 34,588 64,837 2,000 218,560 189,950 408,510 SONOMA 99,662 68,028 47,445 92,821 3,000 310,957 271,934 582,892 WINDSOR 242,604 165,599 108,610 225,951 6,000 748,764 661,960 1,410,724

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 464,814 317,276 187,760 432,907 6,000 1,408,757 1,268,270 2,677,027 HUGHSON 71,355 48,706 32,887 66,457 2,000 221,406 194,697 416,103 MODESTO 2,025,451 1,382,546 802,059 1,886,418 10,000 6,106,473 5,526,556 11,633,030 NEWMAN 114,339 78,046 49,806 106,490 3,000 351,681 311,980 663,661 OAKDALE 214,418 146,359 89,199 199,699 5,000 654,675 585,050 1,239,725 PATTERSON 229,399 156,585 95,096 213,653 5,000 699,733 625,929 1,325,662 RIVERBANK 231,398 157,949 95,883 215,514 5,000 705,745 631,383 1,337,128 TURLOCK 666,989 455,278 267,340 621,204 7,500 2,018,311 1,819,916 3,838,226 WATERFORD 84,301 57,543 37,983 78,515 2,000 260,341 230,021 490,362

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 89,465 61,068 38,707 83,324 2,000 274,563 244,110 518,672 YUBA CITY 650,128 443,769 251,195 605,502 7,500 1,958,093 1,773,911 3,732,005

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 76,084 51,934 33,722 70,861 2,000 234,601 207,599 442,200 RED BLUFF 137,029 93,534 56,889 127,623 3,000 418,074 373,891 791,965 TEHAMA 4,016 2,741 6,327 3,740 1,000 17,825 10,958 28,783

TRINITY COUNTY
15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16 Attachment C

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 236,645 161,531 92,254 220,401 6,000 716,830 645,699 1,362,530 EXETER 95,776 65,375 40,195 89,201 3,000 293,547 261,330 554,877 FARMERSVILLE 96,053 65,565 40,297 89,460 3,000 294,376 262,087 556,463 LINDSAY 117,448 80,168 48,204 109,386 3,000 358,206 320,464 678,670 PORTERVILLE 582,373 397,520 220,020 542,397 7,500 1,749,809 1,589,036 3,338,845 TULARE 655,153 447,199 246,916 610,181 7,500 1,966,949 1,787,622 3,754,571 VISALIA 1,337,457 912,930 499,066 1,245,649 10,000 4,005,102 3,649,325 7,654,427 WOODLAKE 71,374 48,719 31,177 66,475 2,000 219,744 194,747 414,491

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 48,147 32,865 32,834 44,842 2,000 160,688 131,372 292,059

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 654,912 447,035 287,250 609,957 7,500 2,006,655 1,786,965 3,793,620 FILLMORE 157,877 107,765 72,889 147,040 4,000 489,572 430,778 920,350 MOORPARK 335,169 228,782 149,352 312,162 6,000 1,031,465 914,528 1,945,993 OJAI 71,142 48,561 35,482 66,259 2,000 223,445 194,116 417,561 OXNARD 1,866,463 1,274,023 809,768 1,738,343 10,000 5,698,597 5,092,749 10,791,346 PORT HUENEME 204,183 139,373 92,860 190,167 5,000 631,583 557,125 1,188,708 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1,018,648 695,316 444,122 948,725 10,000 3,116,810 2,779,438 5,896,248 SANTA PAULA 290,150 198,052 129,936 270,233 6,000 894,371 791,690 1,686,062 SIMI VALLEY 1,167,808 797,131 508,452 1,087,646 10,000 3,571,037 3,186,430 6,757,468 THOUSAND OAKS 1,173,610 801,091 510,954 1,093,050 10,000 3,588,706 3,202,262 6,790,968

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 603,767 412,124 275,322 562,323 7,500 1,861,035 1,647,413 3,508,448 WEST SACRAMENTO 502,273 342,845 229,846 467,795 7,500 1,550,259 1,370,479 2,920,738 WINTERS 70,208 47,923 36,257 65,389 2,000 221,776 191,566 413,343 WOODLAND 561,441 383,232 256,357 522,902 7,500 1,731,432 1,531,923 3,263,354

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 121,788 83,131 44,348 113,428 3,000 365,695 332,305 698,000 WHEATLAND 36,025 24,590 16,498 33,552 1,000 111,665 98,295 209,960 Statewide Total 307,358,000$ 209,798,500 $ 124,372,215 $ 292,222,000 $ 2,715,000 $ 936,465,715$ 838,643,500 $ 1,775,109,215$ Notes:

3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.

4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 713,438 499,062 278,340 681,108 7,500 2,179,448 2,056,885 4,236,334 ALBANY 192,663 134,771 78,669 183,932 5,000 595,035 555,459 1,150,494 BERKELEY 1,160,837 812,026 449,879 1,108,232 10,000 3,540,974 3,346,764 6,887,738 DUBLIN 677,592 473,987 264,597 646,886 7,500 2,070,562 1,953,539 4,024,100 EMERYVILLE 121,162 84,755 51,255 115,671 3,000 375,842 349,317 725,159 FREMONT 2,094,030 1,464,810 807,676 1,999,136 10,000 6,375,652 6,037,216 12,412,867 HAYWARD 1,492,717 1,044,181 577,125 1,425,072 10,000 4,549,096 4,303,594 8,852,689 LIVERMORE 798,672 558,685 311,020 762,479 7,500 2,438,355 2,302,619 4,740,974 NEWARK 431,819 302,065 170,365 412,251 6,000 1,322,500 1,244,962 2,567,462 OAKLAND 3,941,787 2,757,348 1,516,127 3,763,159 10,000 11,988,421 11,364,411 23,352,832 PIEDMONT 102,542 71,730 44,116 97,896 3,000 319,284 295,636 614,920 PLEASANTON 726,242 508,019 283,250 693,332 7,500 2,218,342 2,093,800 4,312,143 SAN LEANDRO 827,438 578,807 322,049 789,941 7,500 2,525,735 2,385,553 4,911,289 UNION CITY 637,860 446,194 249,363 608,954 7,500 1,949,871 1,838,989 3,788,860

ALPINE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 1,820 1,273 5,719 1,738 1,000 11,550 5,247 16,797 IONE 80,592 56,376 45,483 76,940 2,000 261,392 232,353 493,745 JACKSON 45,784 32,027 27,912 43,709 2,000 151,431 131,997 283,428 PLYMOUTH 9,710 6,792 9,702 9,270 1,000 36,474 27,995 64,469 SUTTER CREEK 24,061 16,831 16,946 22,971 1,000 81,810 69,370 151,180

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 17,864 12,496 12,285 17,054 1,000 60,700 51,503 112,202 CHICO 997,295 697,625 422,674 952,102 10,000 3,079,697 2,875,263 5,954,960 GRIDLEY 66,669 46,636 32,735 63,648 2,000 211,688 192,211 403,898 OROVILLE 182,088 127,374 81,096 173,837 4,000 568,396 524,972 1,093,367 PARADISE 97,292 68,057 45,566 98,668 2,000 311,583 280,497 592,080

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 33,234 23,248 29,747 31,728 1,000 118,957 95,817 214,774

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 58,670 41,041 21,339 56,011 2,000 179,060 169,149 348,209 WILLIAMS 50,452 35,292 19,022 48,166 2,000 154,933 145,457 300,389 TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 16
Attachment C

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 1,052,289 736,094 438,785 1,004,603 10,000 3,241,771 3,033,812 6,275,583 BRENTWOOD 589,801 412,576 248,046 563,073 7,500 1,820,997 1,700,432 3,521,429 CLAYTON 100,686 70,432 46,325 96,123 3,000 316,566 290,284 606,850 CONCORD 1,142,273 799,039 475,897 1,090,509 10,000 3,517,718 3,293,241 6,810,959 DANVILLE 397,384 277,977 168,689 379,376 6,000 1,229,426 1,145,682 2,375,107 EL CERRITO 236,417 165,378 102,303 225,704 6,000 735,802 681,605 1,417,408 HERCULES 237,182 165,913 102,619 226,434 6,000 738,147 683,809 1,421,956 LAFAYETTE 231,376 161,851 100,224 220,891 6,000 720,342 667,070 1,387,412 MARTINEZ 341,617 238,967 145,690 326,136 6,000 1,058,410 984,903 2,043,313 MORAGA 157,463 110,148 69,741 150,327 4,000 491,679 453,975 945,654 OAKLEY 416,212 291,148 176,455 397,351 6,000 1,287,166 1,199,966 2,487,131 ORINDA 177,647 124,267 78,065 169,597 4,000 553,577 512,168 1,065,746 PINOLE 172,315 120,537 75,866 164,506 4,000 537,224 496,794 1,034,017 PITTSBURG 693,863 485,369 290,963 662,420 7,500 2,140,116 2,000,450 4,140,566 PLEASANT HILL 314,070 219,698 134,329 299,838 6,000 973,935 905,484 1,879,419 RICHMOND 1,054,728 737,800 439,791 1,006,931 10,000 3,249,250 3,040,843 6,290,093 SAN PABLO 293,076 205,012 125,671 279,795 6,000 909,553 844,956 1,754,509 SAN RAMON 769,878 538,543 322,314 734,990 7,500 2,373,225 2,219,606 4,592,831 WALNUT CREEK 639,807 447,556 268,670 610,814 7,500 1,974,347 1,844,603 3,818,950

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 61,263 42,855 25,308 58,487 2,000 189,914 176,626 366,540

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 98,466 68,878 70,813 94,512 3,000 335,669 283,882 619,551 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 194,965 136,382 135,509 1,629,473 5,000 2,101,329 562,097 2,663,426 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 16
Attachment C

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 1,147,851 802,942 408,351 1,095,835 10,000 3,464,978 3,309,324 6,774,303 COALINGA 164,152 114,827 62,511 156,713 4,000 502,202 473,259 975,461 FIREBAUGH 76,579 53,568 31,723 73,109 2,000 236,980 220,783 457,762 FOWLER 67,042 46,897 28,370 64,004 2,000 208,313 193,286 401,600 FRESNO 4,977,613 3,481,926 1,754,783 4,752,046 20,000 14,986,368 14,350,761 29,337,128 HURON 57,769 40,410 25,110 55,151 2,000 180,440 166,551 346,991 KERMAN 157,035 109,849 60,009 149,919 4,000 480,812 452,742 933,554 KINGSBURG 118,686 83,023 46,527 113,308 3,000 364,544 342,180 706,724 MENDOTA 114,528 80,114 45,065 109,338 3,000 352,044 330,190 682,234 ORANGE COVE 87,518 61,220 35,569 83,552 2,000 269,859 252,319 522,178 PARLIER 132,564 92,731 51,406 126,557 3,000 406,258 382,191 788,450 REEDLEY 233,451 163,303 86,874 222,871 6,000 712,499 673,052 1,385,551 SANGER 241,823 169,159 89,818 230,864 6,000 737,664 697,190 1,434,854 SAN JOAQUIN 33,653 23,541 16,631 32,128 1,000 106,953 97,024 203,977 SELMA 224,896 157,319 83,867 214,705 5,000 685,787 648,390 1,334,177

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 77,689 54,345 28,877 74,169 2,000 237,081 223,983 461,064 WILLOWS 58,197 40,709 22,836 55,559 2,000 179,302 167,784 347,086

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 168,784 118,067 79,506 161,135 4,000 531,492 486,614 1,018,106 BLUE LAKE 10,966 7,671 9,654 10,469 1,000 39,759 31,615 71,375 EUREKA 245,454 171,699 113,442 234,331 6,000 770,926 707,659 1,478,584 FERNDALE 12,686 8,874 10,415 12,111 1,000 45,086 36,574 81,660 FORTUNA 114,027 79,764 55,270 108,860 3,000 360,921 328,747 689,668 RIO DELL 30,850 21,580 18,455 29,452 1,000 101,337 88,943 190,280 TRINIDAD 2,794 1,954 6,037 2,667 1,000 14,452 8,055 22,507

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 257,949 180,440 112,737 246,259 6,000 803,385 743,682 1,547,067 CALEXICO 357,297 249,935 154,309 341,105 6,000 1,108,647 1,030,109 2,138,756 CALIPATRIA 59,462 41,594 29,681 56,767 2,000 189,504 171,431 360,935 EL CENTRO 409,078 286,157 175,977 390,540 6,000 1,267,751 1,179,396 2,447,147 HOLTVILLE 50,807 35,540 26,060 48,505 2,000 162,912 146,480 309,392 IMPERIAL 201,490 140,946 89,113 192,359 5,000 628,908 580,909 1,209,817 WESTMORLAND 18,656 13,050 12,606 17,810 1,000 63,122 53,785 116,908

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 35,082 24,540 20,119 33,492 1,000 114,233 101,143 215,375 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 16
Attachment C

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 179,832 125,795 54,826 171,682 4,000 536,135 518,465 1,054,600 BAKERSFIELD 3,741,225 2,617,051 1,045,547 3,571,686 10,000 10,985,509 10,786,179 21,771,688 CALIFORNIA CITY 136,669 95,602 42,819 130,475 4,000 409,565 394,024 803,589 DELANO 477,621 334,104 137,666 455,977 7,500 1,412,869 1,377,011 2,789,881 MARICOPA 9,337 6,531 7,397 8,914 1,000 33,179 26,919 60,098 MCFARLAND 129,079 90,293 40,708 123,230 3,000 386,309 372,143 758,452 RIDGECREST 254,263 177,861 75,532 242,741 6,000 756,397 733,056 1,489,453 SHAFTER 202,264 141,487 61,066 193,098 5,000 602,915 583,139 1,186,054 TAFT 77,999 54,562 26,498 74,464 2,000 235,523 224,875 460,398 TEHACHAPI 118,677 83,017 37,814 113,299 3,000 355,808 342,154 697,961 WASCO 246,737 172,597 73,438 235,556 6,000 734,328 711,358 1,445,686

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 127,232 89,001 42,406 121,466 3,000 383,104 366,817 749,920 CORCORAN 196,867 137,712 62,988 187,946 5,000 590,513 567,580 1,158,094 HANFORD 539,522 377,405 164,266 515,073 7,500 1,603,765 1,555,474 3,159,239 LEMOORE 246,000 172,081 77,510 234,852 6,000 736,443 709,233 1,445,676

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 153,522 107,392 61,452 146,565 4,000 472,931 442,615 915,546 LAKEPORT 45,338 31,715 21,530 43,283 1,000 142,866 130,712 273,578

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 147,726 103,337 49,339 176,514 4,000 480,915 425,902 906,817

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 184,118 128,794 76,840 175,774 5,000 570,526 530,823 1,101,348 ALHAMBRA 751,878 525,951 298,989 717,805 7,500 2,302,124 2,167,709 4,469,833 ARCADIA 517,599 362,069 207,322 494,143 7,500 1,588,634 1,492,270 3,080,904 ARTESIA 149,218 104,381 63,185 142,456 4,000 463,239 430,205 893,444 AVALON 31,332 21,918 17,060 29,913 1,000 101,222 90,333 191,555 AZUSA 457,282 319,877 183,722 436,560 7,500 1,404,941 1,318,372 2,723,313 BALDWIN PARK 655,551 458,569 261,299 625,844 7,500 2,008,763 1,889,993 3,898,756 BELL 310,630 217,291 126,341 296,554 6,000 956,817 895,566 1,852,383 BELLFLOWER 717,615 501,984 285,583 685,095 7,500 2,197,778 2,068,928 4,266,706 BELL GARDENS 359,381 251,393 145,416 343,095 6,000 1,105,285 1,036,117 2,141,402 BEVERLY HILLS 297,571 208,156 121,231 284,087 6,000 917,046 857,917 1,774,963 BRADBURY 8,372 5,857 8,076 7,993 1,000 31,298 24,138 55,435 BURBANK 975,291 682,233 386,404 931,094 10,000 2,985,022 2,811,823 5,796,844 CALABASAS 211,355 147,846 87,497 201,777 5,000 653,476 609,349 1,262,825 CARSON 853,747 597,211 338,848 815,058 7,500 2,612,363 2,461,404 5,073,767 CERRITOS 449,201 314,224 180,560 428,845 6,000 1,378,830 1,295,074 2,673,904 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 16
Attachment C

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2025 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code CLAREMONT 348,852 244,028 141,296 333,043 6,000 1,073,219 1,005,761 2,078,980 COMMERCE 112,617 78,777 48,864 107,513 3,000 350,771 324,680 675,451 COMPTON 874,459 611,699 346,952 834,832 7,500 2,675,442 2,521,119 5,196,561 COVINA 466,847 326,567 187,464 445,691 7,500 1,434,069 1,345,947 2,780,016 CUDAHY 207,242 144,969 85,888 197,850 5,000 640,949 597,490 1,238,439 CULVER CITY 367,972 257,402 148,777 351,296 6,000 1,131,448 1,060,884 2,192,332 DIAMOND BAR 500,108 349,834 200,479 477,445 7,500 1,535,366 1,441,843 2,977,209 DOWNEY 1,036,691 725,183 410,428 989,712 10,000 3,172,014 2,988,842 6,160,856 DUARTE 215,277 150,590 89,032 205,522 5,000 665,421 620,657 1,286,079 EL MONTE 993,282 694,818 393,444 948,270 10,000 3,039,814 2,863,693 5,903,507 EL SEGUNDO 157,554 110,212 66,446 150,414 4,000 488,626 454,237 942,864 GARDENA 554,255 387,711 221,665 529,138 7,500 1,700,269 1,597,951 3,298,221 GLENDALE 1,782,735 1,247,054 702,335 1,701,948 10,000 5,444,072 5,139,734 10,583,806 GLENDORA 477,803 334,232 191,751 456,151 7,500 1,467,437 1,377,536 2,844,974 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 126,913 88,778 54,458 121,162 3,000 394,310 365,898 760,209 HAWTHORNE 800,747 560,136 318,110 764,460 7,500 2,450,952 2,308,601 4,759,553 HERMOSA BEACH 179,367 125,471 74,981 171,239 4,000 555,059 517,127 1,072,186 HIDDEN HILLS 15,716 10,994 10,949 15,004 1,000 53,663 45,311 98,974 HUNTINGTON PARK 497,915 348,300 199,620 475,351 7,500 1,528,687 1,435,519 2,964,207 INDUSTRY 3,922 2,744 6,335 3,744 1,000 17,745 11,308 29,053 INGLEWOOD 987,485 690,763 391,176 942,736 10,000 3,022,160 2,846,980 5,869,140 IRWINDALE 13,650 9,549 10,141 13,032 1,000 47,372 39,355 86,727 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 186,930 130,761 77,940 178,459 5,000 579,090 538,930 1,118,019 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 51,453 35,992 24,932 49,122 2,000 163,499 148,343 311,842 LAKEWOOD 748,893 523,863 297,821 714,956 7,500 2,293,033 2,159,104 4,452,137 LA MIRADA 448,728 313,893 180,375 428,393 6,000 1,377,389 1,293,710 2,671,098 LANCASTER 1,593,257 1,114,511 628,198 1,521,057 10,000 4,867,023 4,593,458 9,460,480 LA PUENTE 345,885 241,953 140,135 330,211 6,000 1,064,184 997,208 2,061,392 LA VERNE 295,124 206,444 120,274 281,750 6,000 909,591 850,859 1,760,450 LAWNDALE 289,190 202,293 117,952 276,085 6,000 891,521 833,753 1,725,273 LOMITA 190,479 133,243 79,329 181,847 5,000 589,898 549,162 1,139,060 LONG BEACH 4,225,135 2,955,554 1,657,978 4,033,667 10,000 12,882,334 12,181,320 25,063,654 LOS ANGELES 35,477,940 24,817,427 13,886,337 33,870,207 20,000 108,071,911 102,285,053 210,356,965 LYNWOOD 623,845 436,391 248,893 595,575 7,500 1,912,204 1,798,584 3,710,789 MALIBU 97,701 68,344 43,028 93,274 3,000 305,346 281,678 587,024 MANHATTAN BEACH 322,716 225,745 131,070 308,091 6,000 993,622 930,409 1,924,031 MAYWOOD 228,673 159,961 94,273 218,310 6,000 707,217 659,278 1,366,495 MONROVIA 346,604 242,455 140,417 330,897 6,000 1,066,373 999,280 2,065,654 MONTEBELLO 570,190 398,858 227,900 544,351 7,500 1,748,798 1,643,892 3,392,690 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 16
Attachment C

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2025 TOTAL Road Mntnc
Sec2103 (5) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4) HUTA Rehab Acct TOTALHighway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(1) Streets & Highways Code MONTEREY PARK 555,911 388,870 222,313 530,720 7,500 1,705,313 1,602,727 3,308,040 NORWALK 941,101 658,316 373,027 898,454 10,000 2,880,897 2,713,251 5,594,148 PALMDALE 1,540,512 1,077,615 607,560 1,470,701 10,000 4,706,388 4,441,389 9,147,777 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 121,508 84,997 52,343 116,001 3,000 377,848 350,314 728,161 PARAMOUNT 486,567 340,362 195,180 464,518 7,500 1,494,127 1,402,802 2,896,929 PASADENA 1,274,027 891,204 503,292 1,216,293 10,000 3,894,815 3,673,098 7,567,913 PICO RIVERA 565,421 395,522 226,034 539,798 7,500 1,734,275 1,630,144 3,364,419 POMONA 1,390,438 972,636 548,840 1,327,429 10,000 4,249,343 4,008,718 8,258,061 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 384,116 268,695 155,094 366,709 6,000 1,180,614 1,107,428 2,288,042 REDONDO BEACH 639,034 447,015 254,836 610,075 7,500 1,958,460 1,842,373 3,800,834 ROLLING HILLS (2)
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 77,662 54,326 35,187 74,143 2,000 243,318 223,905 467,223 ROSEMEAD 464,926 325,224 186,713 443,858 7,500 1,428,221 1,340,411 2,768,632 SAN DIMAS 316,709 221,544 128,720 302,357 6,000 975,330 913,093 1,888,423 SAN FERNANDO 215,277 150,590 89,032 205,522 5,000 665,421 620,657 1,286,079 SAN GABRIEL 359,026 251,145 145,277 342,756 6,000 1,104,204 1,035,094 2,139,298 SAN MARINO 114,191 79,878 49,480 109,016 3,000 355,565 329,219 684,784 SANTA CLARITA 2,096,969 1,466,866 825,286 2,001,942 10,000 6,401,064 6,045,690 12,446,754 SANTA FE SPRINGS 170,795 119,474 71,627 163,055 4,000 528,951 492,412 1,021,363 SANTA MONICA 848,833 593,773 336,925 810,367 7,500 2,597,397 2,447,236 5,044,633 SIERRA MADRE 101,705 71,145 44,594 97,096 3,000 317,541 293,222 610,763 SIGNAL HILL 107,011 74,856 46,670 102,161 3,000 333,698 308,518 642,217 SOUTH EL MONTE 177,784 124,363 74,362 169,727 4,000 550,236 512,562 1,062,798 SOUTH GATE 843,864 590,297 334,981 805,623 7,500 2,582,265 2,432,911 5,015,176 SOUTH PASADENA 245,308 171,597 100,782 234,192 6,000 757,880 707,239 1,465,119 TEMPLE CITY 332,544 232,620 134,915 317,474 6,000 1,023,554 958,745 1,982,299 TORRANCE 1,336,110 934,632 527,583 1,275,562 10,000 4,083,886 3,852,085 7,935,971 VERNON 1,920 1,343 5,551 1,833 1,000 11,648 5,536 17,184 WALNUT 258,722 180,981 106,031 246,998 6,000 798,732 745,912 1,544,643 WEST COVINA 997,168 697,536 394,964 951,980 10,000 3,051,648 2,874,896 5,926,544 WEST HOLLYWOOD 324,763 227,177 131,871 310,046 6,000 999,858 936,312 1,936,170 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 74,122 51,850 33,802 70,763 2,000 232,537 213,699 446,236 WHITTIER 799,272 559,105 317,533 763,052 7,500 2,446,462 2,304,351 4,750,813 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 16
Attachment C

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 175,363 122,670 49,391 167,416 4,000 518,840 505,583 1,024,423 MADERA 605,718 423,710 158,821 578,269 7,500 1,774,017 1,746,320 3,520,337

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 19,329 13,521 13,244 18,453 1,000 65,547 55,727 121,274 CORTE MADERA 92,923 65,002 45,395 88,712 3,000 295,032 267,904 562,936 FAIRFAX 69,117 48,348 34,995 65,985 2,000 220,445 199,268 419,713 LARKSPUR 119,032 83,265 56,801 113,638 3,000 375,736 343,177 718,914 MILL VALLEY 128,597 89,956 60,979 122,769 3,000 405,301 370,752 776,053 NOVATO 483,828 338,446 216,167 461,902 7,500 1,507,844 1,394,905 2,902,748 ROSS 21,258 14,871 14,087 20,295 1,000 71,511 61,289 132,800 SAN ANSELMO 116,348 81,387 55,628 111,075 3,000 367,438 335,437 702,875 SAN RAFAEL 560,553 392,116 249,686 535,150 7,500 1,745,005 1,616,107 3,361,112 SAUSALITO 64,785 45,318 33,102 61,849 2,000 207,055 186,780 393,835 TIBURON 83,113 58,139 41,109 79,347 2,000 263,709 239,621 503,329

MARIPOSA COUNTY

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 65,331 45,700 33,383 62,371 2,000 208,785 188,354 397,139 POINT ARENA 4,186 2,928 6,631 3,996 1,000 18,742 12,069 30,811 UKIAH 151,084 105,686 70,901 144,237 4,000 475,907 435,583 911,490 WILLITS 45,019 31,492 24,497 42,979 1,000 144,987 129,793 274,780

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 288,999 202,160 94,799 275,903 6,000 867,861 833,202 1,701,062 DOS PALOS 52,736 36,890 21,223 50,347 2,000 163,196 152,042 315,238 GUSTINE 55,321 38,698 22,028 52,814 2,000 170,861 159,493 330,354 LIVINGSTON 130,007 90,942 45,286 124,116 3,000 393,352 374,819 768,170 LOS BANOS 431,528 301,861 139,185 411,973 6,000 1,290,548 1,244,122 2,534,670 MERCED 835,746 584,619 265,066 797,873 7,500 2,490,805 2,409,508 4,900,312

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 24,753 17,315 14,189 25,585 1,000 82,843 71,364 154,207

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 65,704 45,961 64,448 1,796,454 2,000 1,974,568 189,430 2,163,997 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 16
Attachment C

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 28,830 20,167 13,442 27,523 1,000 90,962 83,118 174,080 DEL REY OAKS 14,369 10,052 9,107 13,718 1,000 48,246 41,428 89,674 GONZALES 77,790 54,415 28,117 74,264 2,000 236,586 224,272 460,858 GREENFIELD 187,112 130,888 60,885 178,633 4,000 561,518 539,455 1,100,972 KING CITY 129,370 90,497 43,578 123,508 3,000 389,952 372,982 762,934 MARINA 206,532 144,473 66,707 197,173 5,000 619,884 595,444 1,215,327 MONTEREY 259,123 181,261 82,470 247,380 6,000 776,234 747,066 1,523,300 PACIFIC GROVE 136,305 95,347 45,656 130,128 3,000 410,436 392,975 803,411 SALINAS 1,474,589 1,031,500 446,798 1,407,766 10,000 4,370,654 4,251,330 8,621,984 SAND CITY 3,449 2,413 5,834 3,293 1,000 15,988 9,944 25,932 SEASIDE 297,863 208,360 94,082 284,365 6,000 890,670 858,756 1,749,426 SOLEDAD 250,714 175,379 79,950 239,352 6,000 751,395 722,823 1,474,218

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 198,005 138,508 68,898 189,032 5,000 599,442 570,860 1,170,302 CALISTOGA 47,658 33,338 20,228 45,499 2,000 148,723 137,402 286,125 NAPA 709,097 496,026 234,348 676,963 7,500 2,123,934 2,044,370 4,168,304 SAINT HELENA 49,105 34,350 20,696 46,880 2,000 153,032 141,574 294,605 YOUNTVILLE 27,164 19,002 13,594 25,933 1,000 86,694 78,317 165,010

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 123,855 86,639 115,770 118,243 3,000 447,507 357,083 804,589 NEVADA CITY 30,468 21,313 32,098 32,587 1,000 117,466 87,841 205,307 TRUCKEE 152,685 106,806 141,600 1,991,179 4,000 2,396,270 440,201 2,836,471 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 16
Attachment C

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 471,342 329,712 213,813 449,983 7,500 1,472,350 1,358,908 2,831,258 ANAHEIM 3,151,979 2,204,863 1,402,519 3,009,143 10,000 9,778,504 9,087,347 18,865,851 BREA 434,313 303,809 197,393 414,631 6,000 1,356,146 1,252,151 2,608,297 BUENA PARK 766,347 536,073 344,630 731,619 7,500 2,386,170 2,209,426 4,595,596 COSTA MESA 1,023,777 716,150 458,786 977,383 10,000 3,186,096 2,951,612 6,137,708 CYPRESS 458,247 320,551 208,006 437,481 7,500 1,431,785 1,321,153 2,752,938 DANA POINT 301,576 210,957 138,531 287,909 6,000 944,973 869,461 1,814,434 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 519,865 363,655 235,330 496,307 7,500 1,622,656 1,498,803 3,121,459 FULLERTON 1,309,318 915,891 585,406 1,249,985 10,000 4,070,600 3,774,844 7,845,443 GARDEN GROVE 1,564,773 1,094,586 698,686 1,493,863 10,000 4,861,909 4,511,337 9,373,245 HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,804,822 1,262,504 805,133 1,723,034 10,000 5,605,492 5,203,411 10,808,903 IRVINE 2,862,507 2,002,373 1,274,155 2,732,788 10,000 8,881,823 8,252,781 17,134,604 LAGUNA BEACH 209,198 146,338 97,567 199,718 5,000 657,821 603,131 1,260,953 LAGUNA HILLS 285,468 199,690 131,388 272,532 6,000 895,078 823,022 1,718,100 LAGUNA NIGUEL 586,907 410,552 265,059 560,311 7,500 1,830,329 1,692,089 3,522,418 LAGUNA WOODS 161,476 112,955 76,405 154,159 4,000 508,995 465,546 974,541 LA HABRA 570,927 399,373 257,973 545,055 7,500 1,780,828 1,646,017 3,426,845 LAKE FOREST 790,973 553,299 355,550 755,129 7,500 2,462,451 2,280,423 4,742,874 LA PALMA 141,719 99,135 67,644 135,297 4,000 447,796 408,585 856,381 LOS ALAMITOS 108,722 76,053 53,012 103,795 3,000 344,581 313,451 658,031 MISSION VIEJO 851,790 595,842 382,519 813,190 7,500 2,650,842 2,455,763 5,106,605 NEWPORT BEACH 774,401 541,707 348,202 739,308 7,500 2,411,118 2,232,646 4,643,763 ORANGE 1,280,352 895,628 572,562 1,222,331 10,000 3,980,872 3,691,332 7,672,204 PLACENTIA 475,274 332,462 215,556 453,736 7,500 1,484,527 1,370,242 2,854,770 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 436,042 305,019 198,159 416,282 6,000 1,361,502 1,257,136 2,618,638 SAN CLEMENTE 583,358 408,069 263,485 556,922 7,500 1,819,335 1,681,857 3,501,191 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 318,439 222,753 146,009 304,008 6,000 997,209 918,078 1,915,286 SANTA ANA 2,828,353 1,978,482 1,259,010 2,700,182 10,000 8,776,028 8,154,314 16,930,342 SEAL BEACH 230,220 161,043 106,889 219,787 6,000 723,939 663,738 1,387,677 STANTON 366,716 256,524 167,417 350,098 6,000 1,146,754 1,057,264 2,204,018 TUSTIN 731,138 511,444 329,017 698,006 7,500 2,277,105 2,107,916 4,385,021 VILLA PARK 53,319 37,297 28,444 50,903 2,000 171,963 153,721 325,684 WESTMINSTER 827,529 578,871 371,761 790,028 7,500 2,575,689 2,385,816 4,961,504 YORBA LINDA 619,250 433,176 279,401 591,188 7,500 1,930,514 1,785,335 3,715,849 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 16
Attachment C

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 125,284 87,638 59,544 119,607 3,000 395,074 361,202 756,275 COLFAX 18,192 12,725 12,749 19,041 1,000 63,707 52,447 116,155 LINCOLN 484,419 338,860 216,472 462,467 7,500 1,509,718 1,396,610 2,906,329 LOOMIS 61,946 43,332 31,868 59,139 2,000 198,285 178,594 376,879 ROCKLIN 651,665 455,851 289,552 622,134 7,500 2,026,702 1,878,790 3,905,492 ROSEVILLE 1,404,444 982,433 618,487 1,340,799 10,000 4,356,163 4,049,097 8,405,260

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 19,211 13,438 9,244 177,717 1,000 220,610 55,386 275,996

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 284,048 198,697 128,711 271,176 6,000 888,633 818,929 1,707,562 BEAUMONT 522,504 365,501 232,733 498,826 7,500 1,627,064 1,506,411 3,133,476 BLYTHE 170,886 119,538 79,346 163,142 4,000 536,911 492,674 1,029,586 CALIMESA 98,893 69,178 47,940 94,412 3,000 313,423 285,115 598,538 CANYON LAKE 100,650 70,406 48,707 96,089 3,000 318,851 290,179 609,030 CATHEDRAL CITY 467,020 326,688 208,529 445,856 7,500 1,455,593 1,346,446 2,802,038 COACHELLA 392,888 274,832 176,191 375,084 6,000 1,224,995 1,132,721 2,357,716 CORONA 1,425,748 997,335 626,758 1,361,138 10,000 4,420,979 4,110,517 8,531,496 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 297,162 207,870 134,432 283,696 6,000 929,159 856,736 1,785,895 EASTVALE 634,156 443,603 281,440 605,418 7,500 1,972,117 1,828,310 3,800,428 HEMET 815,962 570,780 360,750 778,986 7,500 2,533,977 2,352,469 4,886,446 INDIAN WELLS 43,654 30,537 23,843 41,676 1,000 140,711 125,858 266,568 INDIO 825,217 577,254 364,787 787,821 7,500 2,562,579 2,379,152 4,941,731 JURUPA VALLEY 953,723 667,146 420,845 910,504 10,000 2,962,218 2,749,641 5,711,859 LAKE ELSINORE 650,236 454,851 288,454 620,770 7,500 2,021,812 1,874,671 3,896,483 LA QUINTA 349,179 244,257 157,124 333,356 6,000 1,089,916 1,006,705 2,096,621 MENIFEE 1,015,232 710,172 447,678 969,225 10,000 3,152,307 2,926,976 6,079,283 MORENO VALLEY 1,893,495 1,324,532 830,805 1,807,689 10,000 5,866,521 5,459,062 11,325,583 MURRIETA 1,007,460 704,736 444,287 961,806 10,000 3,128,290 2,904,570 6,032,859 NORCO 242,323 169,509 110,509 231,342 6,000 759,684 698,633 1,458,318 PALM DESERT 463,106 323,951 206,822 442,120 7,500 1,443,499 1,335,164 2,778,663 PALM SPRINGS 401,952 281,172 180,145 383,737 6,000 1,253,007 1,158,853 2,411,859 PERRIS 721,756 504,881 319,654 689,048 7,500 2,242,838 2,080,866 4,323,704 RANCHO MIRAGE 154,633 108,168 72,256 147,625 4,000 486,682 445,815 932,498 RIVERSIDE 2,890,481 2,021,941 1,265,723 2,759,495 10,000 8,947,640 8,333,433 17,281,073 SAN JACINTO 489,516 342,425 218,343 467,332 7,500 1,525,115 1,411,303 2,936,418 TEMECULA 998,588 698,529 440,417 953,335 10,000 3,100,869 2,878,989 5,979,857 WILDOMAR 333,900 233,569 150,458 318,769 6,000 1,042,696 962,654 2,005,350 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 16 Attachment C

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 798,290 558,417 369,165 762,114 7,500 2,495,486 2,301,517 4,797,003 ELK GROVE 1,626,037 1,137,441 746,976 1,552,351 10,000 5,072,804 4,687,963 9,760,767 FOLSOM 801,038 560,340 370,420 764,738 7,500 2,504,035 2,309,441 4,813,476 GALT 234,652 164,143 111,903 224,018 6,000 740,716 676,516 1,417,231 ISLETON 7,235 5,061 8,102 6,907 1,000 28,305 20,858 49,163 RANCHO CORDOVA 747,218 522,692 345,855 713,357 7,500 2,336,623 2,154,276 4,490,899 SACRAMENTO 4,735,872 3,312,824 2,166,407 4,521,259 20,000 14,756,362 13,653,807 28,410,169

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 390,149 272,916 171,804 372,469 6,000 1,213,338 1,124,823 2,338,161 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 18,965 13,266 12,918 18,106 1,000 64,255 54,677 118,933

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 333,254 233,117 145,571 318,152 6,000 1,036,093 960,791 1,996,884 APPLE VALLEY 690,869 483,275 296,632 659,562 7,500 2,137,837 1,991,818 4,129,656 BARSTOW 232,368 162,545 102,955 221,838 6,000 725,705 669,930 1,395,635 BIG BEAR LAKE 45,875 32,090 24,178 620,021 2,000 724,164 132,260 856,424 CHINO 842,553 589,381 360,705 804,372 7,500 2,604,511 2,429,133 5,033,644 CHINO HILLS 713,265 498,941 306,092 680,943 7,500 2,206,741 2,056,387 4,263,128 COLTON 489,206 342,208 211,447 467,037 7,500 1,517,398 1,410,411 2,927,809 FONTANA 1,949,499 1,363,708 828,292 1,861,154 10,000 6,012,653 5,620,523 11,633,176 GRAND TERRACE 119,451 83,558 55,258 114,038 3,000 375,304 344,384 719,688 HESPERIA 910,824 637,137 389,543 869,549 10,000 2,817,053 2,625,961 5,443,015 HIGHLAND 517,490 361,993 223,394 494,039 7,500 1,604,416 1,491,955 3,096,371 LOMA LINDA 227,190 158,923 100,768 216,894 6,000 709,774 655,001 1,364,776 MONTCLAIR 345,967 242,010 150,941 330,289 6,000 1,075,207 997,444 2,072,651 NEEDLES 44,810 31,345 23,728 42,779 1,000 143,663 129,190 272,853 ONTARIO 1,649,197 1,153,642 701,441 1,574,461 10,000 5,088,741 4,754,735 9,843,477 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1,585,759 1,109,265 674,644 1,513,898 10,000 4,893,566 4,571,839 9,465,405 REDLANDS 664,770 465,018 285,607 634,645 7,500 2,057,539 1,916,571 3,974,110 RIALTO 946,552 662,129 404,635 903,658 10,000 2,926,974 2,728,967 5,655,941 SAN BERNARDINO 2,061,596 1,442,122 875,644 1,968,172 10,000 6,357,535 5,943,708 12,301,242 TWENTYNINE PALMS 257,330 180,007 113,499 245,669 6,000 802,504 741,898 1,544,402 UPLAND 717,688 502,035 307,960 685,165 7,500 2,220,348 2,069,138 4,289,486 VICTORVILLE 1,257,683 879,771 536,061 1,200,689 10,000 3,884,204 3,625,976 7,510,180 YUCAIPA 497,833 348,243 215,091 475,273 7,500 1,543,940 1,435,283 2,979,224 YUCCA VALLEY 198,087 138,565 88,474 189,110 5,000 619,236 571,096 1,190,332 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 16 Attachment C

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 1,046,801 732,255 475,447 999,364 10,000 3,263,867 3,017,991 6,281,859 CHULA VISTA 2,532,138 1,771,274 1,143,262 2,417,390 10,000 7,874,064 7,300,307 15,174,371 CORONADO 213,894 149,623 100,968 204,201 5,000 673,685 616,669 1,290,355 DEL MAR 35,955 25,151 20,966 34,326 1,000 117,399 103,662 221,060 EL CAJON 967,556 676,822 439,818 923,709 10,000 3,017,904 2,789,521 5,807,426 ENCINITAS 559,725 391,537 256,455 534,360 7,500 1,749,576 1,613,720 3,363,296 ESCONDIDO 1,376,779 963,080 623,807 1,314,388 10,000 4,288,054 3,969,337 8,257,391 IMPERIAL BEACH 241,859 169,185 113,541 230,899 6,000 761,484 697,295 1,458,779 LA MESA 551,816 386,005 252,899 526,810 7,500 1,725,031 1,590,920 3,315,951 LEMON GROVE 250,878 175,493 117,596 239,509 6,000 789,476 723,296 1,512,771 NATIONAL CITY 533,670 373,312 244,741 509,486 7,500 1,668,709 1,538,604 3,207,313 OCEANSIDE 1,576,931 1,103,091 713,796 1,505,471 10,000 4,909,289 4,546,389 9,455,678 POWAY 448,400 313,664 206,403 428,080 6,000 1,402,547 1,292,765 2,695,312 SAN DIEGO 12,607,398 8,819,091 5,673,149 12,036,075 20,000 39,155,712 36,347,892 75,503,604 SAN MARCOS 873,613 611,107 397,581 834,024 7,500 2,723,825 2,518,679 5,242,504 SANTEE 542,871 379,747 248,877 518,270 7,500 1,697,265 1,565,129 3,262,394 SOLANA BEACH 117,676 82,317 57,708 112,344 3,000 373,044 339,268 712,312 VISTA 907,512 634,820 412,822 866,386 7,500 2,829,040 2,616,411 5,445,451

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO 7,953,365 5,563,515 2,072,898 7,592,946 20,000 23,202,724 22,930,032 46,132,756

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 67,743 47,387 33,369 64,673 2,000 215,172 195,307 410,479 LATHROP 337,012 235,746 146,929 321,740 6,000 1,047,427 971,627 2,019,054 LODI 605,099 423,277 259,990 577,678 7,500 1,873,543 1,744,536 3,618,080 MANTECA 827,374 578,762 353,731 789,881 7,500 2,557,248 2,385,370 4,942,618 MOUNTAIN HOUSE 214,677 150,170 95,336 204,948 5,000 670,131 618,926 1,289,057 RIPON 145,496 101,777 66,160 138,903 4,000 456,336 419,474 875,810 STOCKTON 2,914,743 2,038,913 1,234,043 2,782,657 10,000 8,980,355 8,403,380 17,383,735 TRACY 879,173 614,997 375,576 839,332 7,500 2,716,578 2,534,710 5,251,288

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 166,964 116,794 89,509 159,397 4,000 536,664 481,366 1,018,031 ATASCADERO 280,290 196,068 147,005 267,588 6,000 896,951 808,093 1,705,044 EL PASO DE ROBLES 285,595 199,779 149,697 272,653 6,000 913,725 823,389 1,737,114 GROVER BEACH 116,384 81,413 63,848 111,110 3,000 375,754 335,542 711,296 MORRO BAY 96,072 67,204 53,542 91,718 3,000 311,537 276,982 588,519 PISMO BEACH 73,294 51,270 41,986 69,973 2,000 238,523 211,311 449,834 SAN LUIS OBISPO 443,040 309,914 229,577 422,963 6,000 1,411,494 1,277,312 2,688,806 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 16 Attachment C

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 65,359 45,719 33,657 62,397 2,000 209,132 188,433 397,565 BELMONT 255,956 179,045 117,811 244,357 6,000 803,169 737,936 1,541,105 BRISBANE 44,146 30,881 24,291 42,145 1,000 142,463 127,275 269,738 BURLINGAME 284,321 198,888 130,335 271,437 6,000 890,981 819,716 1,710,697 COLMA 13,487 9,434 10,755 12,876 1,000 47,551 38,883 86,434 DALY CITY 954,042 667,368 426,033 910,808 10,000 2,968,251 2,750,560 5,718,811 EAST PALO ALTO 273,319 191,191 125,477 260,933 6,000 856,921 787,996 1,644,917 FOSTER CITY 306,554 214,439 140,151 292,662 6,000 959,806 883,812 1,843,618 HALF MOON BAY 106,938 74,805 52,016 102,092 3,000 338,850 308,308 647,159 HILLSBOROUGH 103,498 72,399 50,497 98,808 3,000 328,201 298,391 626,592 MENLO PARK 310,731 217,361 141,995 296,649 6,000 972,737 895,855 1,868,592 MILLBRAE 212,229 148,458 98,504 202,611 5,000 666,802 611,868 1,278,670 PACIFICA 351,955 246,199 160,197 336,006 6,000 1,100,356 1,014,708 2,115,064 PORTOLA VALLEY 40,378 28,245 22,628 38,548 1,000 130,800 116,413 247,212 REDWOOD CITY 759,458 531,254 340,120 725,042 7,500 2,363,375 2,189,565 4,552,940 SAN BRUNO 400,423 280,103 181,597 382,278 6,000 1,250,401 1,154,445 2,404,846 SAN CARLOS 279,726 195,673 128,306 267,050 6,000 876,754 806,466 1,683,221 SAN MATEO 962,059 672,977 429,573 918,462 10,000 2,993,071 2,773,674 5,766,745 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 602,969 421,787 271,026 575,645 7,500 1,878,928 1,738,397 3,617,325 WOODSIDE 48,295 33,783 26,124 46,107 2,000 156,309 139,239 295,548

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 46,812 32,746 21,444 44,691 2,000 147,693 134,962 282,655 CARPINTERIA 119,587 83,653 47,320 114,168 3,000 367,728 344,778 712,506 GOLETA 297,226 207,914 110,479 283,756 6,000 905,376 856,920 1,762,295 GUADALUPE 78,954 55,230 32,872 75,376 2,000 244,433 227,630 472,064 LOMPOC 405,374 283,566 148,931 387,004 6,000 1,230,875 1,168,718 2,399,593 SANTA BARBARA 795,441 556,425 287,621 759,395 7,500 2,406,381 2,293,305 4,699,686 SANTA MARIA 1,006,569 704,112 362,687 960,955 10,000 3,044,322 2,901,998 5,946,321 SOLVANG 52,909 37,011 23,612 50,512 2,000 166,044 152,541 318,585 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 16 Attachment C

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 397,930 278,359 168,746 379,897 6,000 1,230,931 1,147,256 2,378,187 CUPERTINO 549,095 384,102 231,025 524,212 7,500 1,695,935 1,583,075 3,279,010 GILROY 555,420 388,526 233,631 530,250 7,500 1,715,327 1,601,310 3,316,637 LOS ALTOS 287,143 200,861 123,102 274,130 6,000 891,236 827,849 1,719,085 LOS ALTOS HILLS 77,134 53,957 36,579 73,639 2,000 243,309 222,383 465,692 LOS GATOS 304,360 212,905 130,195 290,568 6,000 944,029 877,489 1,821,518 MILPITAS 744,161 520,553 311,392 710,438 7,500 2,294,044 2,145,461 4,439,504 MONTE SERENO 32,597 22,802 18,230 31,120 1,000 105,750 93,980 199,730 MORGAN HILL 422,109 295,273 178,708 402,981 6,000 1,305,071 1,216,967 2,522,038 MOUNTAIN VIEW 787,497 550,867 329,246 751,810 7,500 2,426,920 2,270,400 4,697,320 PALO ALTO 621,124 434,487 260,701 592,977 7,500 1,916,790 1,790,739 3,707,529 SAN JOSE 9,213,641 6,445,100 3,800,788 8,796,112 20,000 28,275,640 26,563,486 54,839,127 SANTA CLARA 1,201,680 840,595 499,888 1,147,224 10,000 3,699,387 3,464,515 7,163,902 SARATOGA 282,938 197,920 121,370 270,116 6,000 878,344 815,728 1,694,072 SUNNYVALE 1,433,902 1,003,039 595,562 1,368,922 10,000 4,411,425 4,134,025 8,545,451

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 89,720 62,761 39,411 85,654 2,000 279,546 258,668 538,215 SANTA CRUZ 588,745 411,838 231,918 562,066 7,500 1,802,067 1,697,389 3,499,456 SCOTTS VALLEY 109,832 76,829 47,169 104,855 3,000 341,685 316,652 658,337 WATSONVILLE 471,479 329,807 186,681 450,113 7,500 1,445,580 1,359,302 2,804,881

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 101,660 71,113 59,094 97,053 3,000 331,920 293,091 625,011 REDDING 853,119 596,771 460,433 814,459 7,500 2,732,282 2,459,594 5,191,876 SHASTA LAKE 94,116 65,835 55,065 89,851 3,000 307,867 271,341 579,208

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 6,716 4,698 6,439 7,846 1,000 26,699 19,363 46,062

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 7,808 5,462 8,865 7,454 1,000 30,590 22,511 53,101 DUNSMUIR 15,498 10,841 12,869 43,324 1,000 83,532 44,681 128,214 ETNA 6,225 4,354 8,041 5,943 1,000 25,562 17,946 43,508 FORT JONES 6,316 4,418 8,088 6,029 1,000 25,851 18,208 44,060 MONTAGUE 11,184 7,824 10,623 10,677 1,000 41,309 32,245 73,554 MOUNT SHASTA 29,494 20,632 20,157 101,325 1,000 172,608 85,033 257,641 TULELAKE 8,190 5,729 9,064 7,819 1,000 31,803 23,613 55,416 WEED 26,564 18,582 18,631 69,849 1,000 134,626 76,585 211,211 YREKA 71,028 49,685 41,782 75,202 2,000 239,698 204,778 444,476 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 16 Attachment C

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 246,455 172,399 111,971 235,287 6,000 772,112 710,545 1,482,656 DIXON 176,574 123,516 81,583 168,572 4,000 554,245 509,072 1,063,317 FAIRFIELD 1,096,107 766,745 481,441 1,046,435 10,000 3,400,728 3,160,142 6,560,870 RIO VISTA 91,040 63,684 44,388 86,914 2,000 288,026 262,473 550,499 SUISUN CITY 268,041 187,499 121,357 255,894 6,000 838,792 772,778 1,611,570 VACAVILLE 930,317 650,773 409,347 888,158 10,000 2,888,596 2,682,160 5,570,756 VALLEJO 1,146,058 801,687 503,162 1,094,123 10,000 3,555,031 3,304,156 6,859,187

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 81,985 57,350 40,756 78,270 2,000 260,361 236,367 496,728 COTATI 68,990 48,259 35,057 65,863 2,000 220,169 198,901 419,070 HEALDSBURG 102,906 71,985 49,932 98,243 3,000 326,067 296,686 622,752 PETALUMA 544,454 380,855 243,584 519,781 7,500 1,696,174 1,569,694 3,265,869 ROHNERT PARK 401,069 280,555 180,699 382,894 6,000 1,251,218 1,156,308 2,407,525 SANTA ROSA 1,620,395 1,133,494 715,463 1,546,964 10,000 5,026,316 4,671,696 9,698,012 SEBASTOPOL 68,462 47,890 34,826 65,359 2,000 218,537 197,379 415,916 SONOMA 98,010 68,560 47,785 93,569 3,000 310,924 282,570 593,495 WINDSOR 238,583 166,893 109,436 227,771 6,000 748,684 687,850 1,436,534

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 457,109 319,756 189,217 436,395 6,000 1,408,477 1,317,874 2,726,351 HUGHSON 70,173 49,087 33,111 66,993 2,000 221,363 202,312 423,675 MODESTO 1,991,879 1,393,353 808,408 1,901,614 10,000 6,105,254 5,742,708 11,847,962 NEWMAN 112,444 78,656 50,164 107,348 3,000 351,612 324,182 675,794 OAKDALE 210,864 147,503 89,871 201,308 5,000 654,546 607,933 1,262,478 PATTERSON 225,597 157,809 95,815 215,374 5,000 699,595 650,410 1,350,005 RIVERBANK 227,563 159,184 96,608 217,250 5,000 705,605 656,077 1,361,683 TURLOCK 655,933 458,836 269,431 626,209 7,500 2,017,909 1,891,095 3,909,004 WATERFORD 82,904 57,993 38,247 79,147 2,000 260,291 239,017 499,308

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 87,982 61,545 38,977 83,995 2,000 274,498 253,657 528,156 YUBA CITY 639,352 447,238 253,157 610,379 7,500 1,957,626 1,843,292 3,800,918

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 74,823 52,340 33,952 71,432 2,000 234,547 215,719 450,266 RED BLUFF 134,758 94,265 57,303 128,651 3,000 417,977 388,514 806,491 TEHAMA 3,950 2,763 6,339 3,771 1,000 17,822 11,387 29,208

TRINITY COUNTY
15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 16 Attachment C

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 232,723 162,793 92,950 222,176 6,000 716,643 670,953 1,387,596 EXETER 94,188 65,886 40,476 89,920 3,000 293,471 271,551 565,022 FARMERSVILLE 94,461 66,077 40,580 90,181 3,000 294,299 272,338 566,637 LINDSAY 115,501 80,795 48,549 110,267 3,000 358,113 332,997 691,110 PORTERVILLE 572,720 400,627 221,734 546,766 7,500 1,749,347 1,651,186 3,400,533 TULARE 644,294 450,695 248,844 615,097 7,500 1,966,429 1,857,538 3,823,968 VISALIA 1,315,288 920,067 503,002 1,255,684 10,000 4,004,041 3,792,055 7,796,096 WOODLAKE 70,191 49,100 31,387 67,010 2,000 219,687 202,364 422,052

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 47,349 33,121 33,057 45,203 2,000 160,731 136,510 297,241

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 644,057 450,529 289,500 614,871 7,500 2,006,457 1,856,856 3,863,313 FILLMORE 155,261 108,607 73,432 148,225 4,000 489,524 447,626 937,150 MOORPARK 329,614 230,570 150,503 314,677 6,000 1,031,364 950,296 1,981,660 OJAI 69,963 48,941 35,727 66,793 2,000 223,423 201,708 425,132 OXNARD 1,835,526 1,283,982 816,179 1,752,347 10,000 5,698,034 5,291,933 10,989,967 PORT HUENEME 200,799 140,462 93,561 191,699 5,000 631,521 578,915 1,210,436 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1,001,764 700,751 447,621 956,367 10,000 3,116,503 2,888,145 6,004,648 SANTA PAULA 285,341 199,601 130,932 272,410 6,000 894,284 822,654 1,716,938 SIMI VALLEY 1,148,452 803,362 512,463 1,096,408 10,000 3,570,685 3,311,056 6,881,741 THOUSAND OAKS 1,154,158 807,353 514,985 1,101,855 10,000 3,588,352 3,327,507 6,915,858

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 593,760 415,345 277,476 566,853 7,500 1,860,934 1,711,845 3,572,779 WEST SACRAMENTO 493,947 345,525 231,639 471,563 7,500 1,550,174 1,424,080 2,974,254 WINTERS 69,044 48,298 36,508 65,915 2,000 221,765 199,058 420,823 WOODLAND 552,135 386,228 258,361 527,114 7,500 1,731,337 1,591,838 3,323,176

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 119,769 83,781 44,663 114,342 3,000 365,555 345,302 710,857 WHEATLAND 35,428 24,782 16,591 33,822 1,000 111,623 102,140 213,763 Statewide Total 302,263,500$ 211,438,500 $ 125,343,590 $ 294,528,000 $ 2,715,000 $ 936,288,590$ 871,444,000 $ 1,807,732,590$ Notes:

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.

3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.

4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July.

5. Str&HwysCode § 2103 allocations replace the former Prop42 TCRF revenues. Previously adjusted annually by the BOE until July 2019. 15 January 2025 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 16 Attachment C
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL ALAMEDA $9,033,328 $14,075,911 $6,552,827 $435,538 $24,647,940 $54,745,545 ALPINE $175,357 $289,338 $140,052 $20,812 $478,473 $1,104,032 AMADOR $893,813 $750,256 $562,636 $206,560 $2,438,818 $4,852,083 BUTTE $2,944,969 $2,529,142 $1,853,796 $430,673 $8,035,513 $15,794,092 CALAVERAS $1,351,892 $1,056,902 $850,987 $349,766 $3,688,713 $7,298,261 COLUSA $1,041,921 $609,145 $655,867 $121,494 $2,842,941 $5,271,368 CONTRA COSTA $7,646,894 $11,461,720 $5,608,757 $959,056 $20,864,978 $46,541,407 DEL NORTE $534,903 $337,843 $336,710 $116,866 $1,459,512 $2,785,834 EL DORADO $2,857,626 $3,740,286 $2,086,907 $881,239 $7,797,191 $17,363,248 FRESNO $9,991,213 $10,021,593 $6,289,257 $1,262,069 $27,261,585 $54,825,718 GLENN $1,274,266 $750,004 $802,124 $146,423 $3,476,906 $6,449,723 HUMBOLDT $2,393,455 $1,721,884 $1,506,629 $414,293 $6,530,675 $12,566,937 IMPERIAL $4,517,184 $2,493,019 $2,843,471 $454,592 $12,325,388 $22,633,654 INYO $1,490,511 $965,161 $938,245 $130,605 $4,066,942 $7,591,464 KERN $9,186,209 $8,925,827 $5,782,524 $2,036,879 $25,065,085 $50,996,524 KINGS $1,895,697 $1,379,546 $1,193,301 $238,040 $5,172,515 $9,879,098 LAKE $1,325,267 $1,018,483 $834,228 $342,686 $3,616,066 $7,136,730 LASSEN $1,278,905 $932,828 $805,043 $130,652 $3,489,563 $6,636,991 LOS ANGELES $55,058,231 $85,102,049 $39,686,274 $2,784,501 $150,229,465 $332,860,521 MADERA $2,828,669 $1,816,096 $1,780,587 $533,113 $7,718,182 $14,676,648 MARIN $2,067,740 $2,642,842 $1,332,491 $308,004 $5,641,945 $11,993,023 MARIPOSA $850,432 $537,121 $535,329 $138,605 $2,320,450 $4,381,937 MENDOCINO $1,956,197 $1,319,277 $1,231,385 $407,151 $5,337,593 $10,251,603 MERCED $3,780,579 $2,862,373 $2,379,794 $613,083 $10,315,520 $19,951,349 MODOC $1,253,493 $866,619 $789,047 $66,024 $3,420,226 $6,395,409 MONO $919,677 $775,984 $578,917 $31,736 $2,509,391 $4,815,705 MONTEREY $4,213,061 $4,557,290 $2,652,033 $938,587 $11,495,573 $23,856,545 NAPA $1,447,471 $1,617,354 $911,152 $325,192 $3,949,506 $8,250,675 NEVADA $1,525,079 $1,726,554 $960,005 $321,522 $4,161,264 $8,694,425 ORANGE $19,770,495 $32,118,392 $14,869,455 $810,502 $53,944,902 $121,513,746 PLACER $4,319,462 $6,280,370 $3,239,174 $892,887 $11,785,892 $26,517,786 PLUMAS $1,026,136 $1,044,260 $645,931 $156,898 $2,799,869 $5,673,093 RIVERSIDE $17,262,425 $24,295,897 $11,777,607 $1,785,998 $47,101,491 $102,223,419 County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2024-25
CSAC Current Year Estimates - Based on January 10 budget revenue estimates - 1/10/2025 Attachment C
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL SACRAMENTO $11,956,133 $15,508,535 $8,026,312 $2,265,995 $32,622,977 $70,379,952 SAN BENITO $1,024,234 $846,700 $644,734 $170,442 $2,794,681 $5,480,791 SAN BERNARDINO $16,072,611 $22,524,876 $10,876,655 $1,561,833 $43,855,018 $94,890,993 SAN DIEGO $22,184,686 $33,094,216 $15,897,978 $2,112,376 $60,532,158 $133,821,413 SAN FRANCISCO* $4,150,794 $5,061,852 $2,612,837 $9,600 $11,325,673 $23,160,755 SAN JOAQUIN $6,828,690 $8,132,712 $4,298,516 $807,589 $18,632,463 $38,699,971 SAN LUIS OBISPO $3,677,852 $3,527,719 $2,315,130 $690,577 $10,035,226 $20,246,504 SAN MATEO $4,938,784 $7,585,801 $3,560,354 $298,720 $13,475,749 $29,859,408 SANTA BARBARA $3,706,692 $4,578,024 $2,456,529 $862,041 $10,113,917 $21,717,204 SANTA CLARA $11,400,856 $17,750,518 $8,159,834 $319,700 $31,107,873 $68,738,781 SANTA CRUZ $2,390,493 $2,881,556 $1,603,009 $668,359 $6,522,595 $14,066,012 SHASTA $2,832,095 $2,592,650 $1,782,744 $428,895 $7,727,529 $15,363,913 SIERRA $502,735 $433,633 $316,461 $35,656 $1,371,741 $2,660,227 SISKIYOU $2,032,805 $1,551,204 $1,279,608 $212,261 $5,546,623 $10,622,500 SOLANO $3,493,604 $4,685,265 $2,207,790 $203,959 $9,532,495 $20,123,112 SONOMA $5,140,581 $5,920,274 $3,235,887 $989,094 $14,026,363 $29,312,199 STANISLAUS $5,278,486 $5,823,743 $3,322,695 $758,975 $14,402,645 $29,586,544 SUTTER $1,614,750 $1,226,801 $1,016,451 $220,895 $4,405,935 $8,484,831 TEHAMA $1,788,505 $1,015,451 $1,125,826 $271,908 $4,880,036 $9,081,726 TRINITY $942,240 $694,910 $593,120 $95,535 $2,570,956 $4,896,762 TULARE $6,385,845 $4,910,562 $4,019,754 $785,759 $17,424,135 $33,526,055 TUOLUMNE $1,251,458 $1,081,205 $787,766 $342,881 $3,414,672 $6,877,982 VENTURA $6,031,613 $9,016,845 $4,367,943 $656,106 $16,457,594 $36,530,101 YOLO $2,305,041 $2,372,958 $1,450,975 $189,507 $6,289,434 $12,607,915 YUBA $1,313,859 $947,625 $827,047 $319,789 $3,584,938 $6,993,258 TOTALS $307,358,000 $394,387,000 $209,798,500 $34,070,501 $838,643,500 $1,784,257,501 * county share only
C:\Users\mneuburger\Documents\2. Budget\1. Jan 10\HUTA-RMRA\[HUTA and RMRA 2024-25 Jan 10 Worksheet 1.13.25.xlsx]REVENUES County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2024-25
CSAC Current Year Estimates - Based on January 10 budget revenue estimates - 1/10/2025 Attachment C
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL ALAMEDA $8,883,599 $14,190,267 $6,605,127 $438,931 $25,611,955 $55,729,878 ALPINE $172,451 $289,396 $140,100 $20,901 $497,186 $1,120,034 AMADOR $878,997 $755,815 $566,960 $208,129 $2,534,203 $4,944,105 BUTTE $2,896,156 $2,548,871 $1,868,043 $434,026 $8,349,793 $16,096,889 CALAVERAS $1,329,484 $1,064,197 $857,528 $352,476 $3,832,984 $7,436,668 COLUSA $1,024,651 $609,875 $660,908 $122,385 $2,954,132 $5,371,952 CONTRA COSTA $7,520,146 $11,554,464 $5,653,306 $966,618 $21,681,036 $47,375,570 DEL NORTE $526,037 $340,394 $339,298 $117,721 $1,516,596 $2,840,045 EL DORADO $2,810,260 $3,761,612 $2,099,395 $888,180 $8,102,150 $17,661,598 FRESNO $9,825,608 $10,101,262 $6,337,594 $1,272,044 $28,327,823 $55,864,332 GLENN $1,253,145 $750,920 $808,288 $147,513 $3,612,893 $6,572,759 HUMBOLDT $2,353,783 $1,735,115 $1,518,209 $417,516 $6,786,099 $12,810,721 IMPERIAL $4,442,311 $2,513,158 $2,865,325 $458,136 $12,807,451 $23,086,381 INYO $1,465,805 $965,860 $945,456 $131,569 $4,226,005 $7,734,695 KERN $9,033,946 $8,997,105 $5,826,967 $2,053,024 $26,045,415 $51,956,458 KINGS $1,864,275 $1,390,617 $1,202,472 $239,859 $5,374,819 $10,072,043 LAKE $1,303,301 $1,026,597 $840,639 $345,338 $3,757,495 $7,273,371 LASSEN $1,257,707 $933,675 $811,231 $131,616 $3,626,044 $6,760,273 LOS ANGELES $54,145,634 $85,792,741 $40,002,869 $2,806,601 $156,105,146 $338,852,990 MADERA $2,781,784 $1,830,501 $1,794,272 $537,282 $8,020,051 $14,963,890 MARIN $2,033,467 $2,664,046 $1,342,963 $310,381 $5,862,609 $12,213,467 MARIPOSA $836,336 $537,783 $539,443 $139,632 $2,411,206 $4,464,400 MENDOCINO $1,923,773 $1,329,529 $1,240,849 $410,317 $5,546,354 $10,450,822 MERCED $3,717,915 $2,885,519 $2,398,084 $617,890 $10,718,974 $20,338,382 MODOC $1,232,716 $866,956 $795,112 $66,473 $3,553,996 $6,515,253 MONO $904,433 $776,401 $583,367 $31,913 $2,607,536 $4,903,650 MONTEREY $4,143,229 $4,594,088 $2,672,416 $945,986 $11,945,181 $24,300,900 NAPA $1,423,479 $1,630,282 $918,155 $327,706 $4,103,976 $8,403,599 NEVADA $1,499,801 $1,738,245 $967,383 $324,007 $4,324,016 $8,853,452 ORANGE $19,442,796 $32,379,779 $14,988,391 $816,880 $56,054,761 $123,682,608 PLACER $4,247,866 $6,321,825 $3,260,640 $899,922 $12,246,855 $26,977,108 PLUMAS $1,009,127 $1,045,038 $650,895 $158,071 $2,909,376 $5,772,507 RIVERSIDE $16,976,298 $24,492,715 $11,871,306 $1,800,146 $48,943,696 $104,084,160 County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2025-26
CSAC Current Year Estimates - Based on January 10 budget revenue estimates - 1/10/2025 Attachment C
COUNTY HUTA 2103 HUTA 2104 HUTA 2105 HUTA 2106 RMRA TOTAL SACRAMENTO $11,757,958 $15,634,664 $8,090,315 $2,283,966 $33,898,906 $71,665,809 SAN BENITO $1,007,258 $853,388 $649,689 $171,723 $2,903,985 $5,586,043 SAN BERNARDINO $15,806,205 $22,700,832 $10,960,248 $1,574,195 $45,570,248 $96,611,728 SAN DIEGO $21,816,972 $33,362,613 $16,024,625 $2,129,122 $62,899,654 $136,232,986 SAN FRANCISCO* $4,081,994 $5,102,868 $2,632,918 $9,600 $11,768,636 $23,596,016 SAN JOAQUIN $6,715,504 $8,198,777 $4,331,553 $813,945 $19,361,204 $39,420,982 SAN LUIS OBISPO $3,616,891 $3,556,039 $2,332,923 $696,000 $10,427,717 $20,629,572 SAN MATEO $4,856,923 $7,647,412 $3,588,742 $301,023 $14,002,804 $30,396,904 SANTA BARBARA $3,645,253 $4,614,830 $2,475,889 $868,830 $10,509,487 $22,114,288 SANTA CLARA $11,211,885 $17,894,896 $8,225,060 $322,170 $32,324,544 $69,978,555 SANTA CRUZ $2,350,871 $2,904,364 $1,615,464 $673,606 $6,777,703 $14,322,006 SHASTA $2,785,153 $2,612,142 $1,796,445 $432,234 $8,029,764 $15,655,738 SIERRA $494,402 $433,775 $318,893 $35,863 $1,425,392 $2,708,326 SISKIYOU $1,999,111 $1,552,726 $1,289,443 $213,875 $5,763,559 $10,818,713 SOLANO $3,435,697 $4,723,255 $2,225,351 $205,507 $9,905,324 $20,495,134 SONOMA $5,055,375 $5,967,905 $3,260,757 $996,895 $14,574,954 $29,855,886 STANISLAUS $5,190,995 $5,871,005 $3,348,232 $764,943 $14,965,952 $30,141,127 SUTTER $1,587,985 $1,236,628 $1,024,263 $222,577 $4,578,257 $8,649,711 TEHAMA $1,758,860 $1,017,219 $1,134,479 $273,997 $5,070,901 $9,255,456 TRINITY $926,623 $695,351 $597,679 $96,220 $2,671,509 $4,987,381 TULARE $6,279,999 $4,949,662 $4,050,649 $791,940 $18,105,617 $34,177,866 TUOLUMNE $1,230,715 $1,088,428 $793,821 $345,535 $3,548,225 $7,006,723 VENTURA $5,931,638 $9,089,603 $4,402,542 $661,255 $17,101,273 $37,186,312 YOLO $2,266,835 $2,392,119 $1,462,126 $190,940 $6,535,423 $12,847,443 YUBA $1,292,082 $954,851 $833,403 $322,260 $3,725,150 $7,127,745 TOTALS $302,263,500 $397,470,000 $211,438,500 $34,337,410 $871,444,000 $1,816,953,410 * county share only
C:\Users\mneuburger\Documents\2. Budget\1. Jan 10\HUTA-RMRA\[HUTA and RMRA 2024-25 Jan 10 Worksheet 1.13.25.xlsx]REVENUES County HUTA and RMRA Revenue Estimates - FY 2025-26
CSAC Current Year Estimates - Based on January 10 budget revenue estimates - 1/10/2025 Attachment C

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Alex Posada, Director of Recreation and Parks

DATE: June 3, 2025

SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Declaring to Levy and Collect the 2025 -26 Landscape District.

Description:

The City Council will consider adoption of the engineers reports and the intent to levy and collect the 2025-26 landscape district assessments.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Approve the Engineer’s Reports for the 2025 -2026 landscape maintenance districts and special benefit zones assessment proceedings; and

2. Adopt a Resolution de claring the intent to levy and collect the property tax assessments for each of the four Landscape Maintenance Districts and the 20 Special Benefit Zones.

BACKGROUND:

During the 1980s, the City of Santa Maria established four geographic Landscape Maintenance Districts with Broadway and Stowell serving as the center point. The four “Master Districts” consist of the following: th e South Miller Street/South College Drive Landscape Maintenance District created with Resolution 81 -298 on August 4, 1981; the Northwest Landscape Maintenance District with Resolution 88 -154 on December 20, 1988; the Northeast Landscape Maintenance Distric t with Resolution 89 -51 on May 2, 1989; and the Southwest Landscape Maintenance District with Resolution 89-50 on May 2, 1989. The creation of these districts enables the City of Santa Maria to levy and collect assessments for the purposes of maintaining t he public landscaping and parks, and for nuisance abatement within each district.

Within the four “Master Districts ,” there are currently 20 Special Benefit Zones (SBZ).

Each SBZ was created at the time when a new development was built, in order to provide for the perpetual maintenance of additional public improvements associated with the development of each project. These public improvements include retention basins, parks, sidewalks, graffiti abatement, public safety, pest abatement, trees, and all public thoroughfare landscaping. The cost for maintaining the public improvements varies, based on the type and extent of public improvements in a given subdivision. This cost is distributed among all assessed properties within the specific SBZ and collected annually through property taxes.

Under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“the Act”), the City is authorized to provide and maintain landscaping, public lighting , public safety , appurtenant facilities, park and recreational improvements. By following the procedures set out in the Act, as well as Proposition 218 and its implementing legislation, the City can assess property owners for the special benefit received as a result of installing and maintaining these improvements.

The process of assessing property for improvements under the Act has several steps. A typical first step is annexing property into a particular part of the City’s system under the Act, and setting of the assessment for the first fiscal year. This is accomplis hed through the consent of the current property owners and action of the Council pursuant to an Engineer’s Report. The Engineer’s Report correctly apportions the costs to specific property according to the special benefit received. If particular properties receive additional benefit s, they are placed into a “zone” which receives a particularized assessment amount according to the additional special benefit received.

Assessment law, in particular Proposition 218, allows only the special benefit received by properties to be assessed. General benefits received by the public are not recoverable using assessments. The Engineer’s Report apportions or spreads these special benefit amounts to the properties to be assessed.

Amounts are assessable to property under the Act for one fiscal year. Each year at this time, the City conduct s assessment proceedings under the Act. In order to collect assessments going forward, the City must not receive a majority protest. If the City wishes to increase assessments within the meaning of the law (i.e. above the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI), then the City must follow the specialized election proceedings under Proposition 218. In addition, Proposition 218 removes former provisions of statutory law that allowed public entities to be exempt from assessment.

DISCUSSION:

The process of annexation, calculating, and levying assessments in the Landscape Maintenance Districts is outlined in the California Streets and Highways Code, which the City of Santa Maria follows in these proceedings. The City of Santa Maria’s process f or annexation, calculating, and levying of assessments has been refined by the City Attorney in compliance with state law and the most recent case law. The recommended action tonight is to meet the statutory requirements by the City Council: 1) adopting a Resolution approving the Engineer’s Reports for assessment proceedings; and 2) declaring the intent to levy and collect the property tax assessments for each of the four Landscape Maintenance Districts and the SBZ’s, and conduct tonight’s public hearing to consider any protest of the proposed assessments. If no legal protest is found, the City Council will move to approve the assessments contained in this report.

The Director of Finance has determined that the annual Consumer Price Index CPI1 rose by

3.4 percent in calendar year 2024, requiring that the 2025 district and SBZ assessments be increased by 3.4 percent to keep pace with increased costs. In addition to the increase in 3 1 U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for Urban Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County areas – includes Santa Maria for the period ending December 31, 2016.

CPI, state law has required the City to use the Department of La bor Statistics prevailing wage rates for our geographic area for all contracted services. This has had a significant impact on the rates being paid to our contractors. This increase will need to be addressed by future increases in assessment rates in ord er to keep pace with the prevailing wage requirement.

The proposed assessments are intended to provide funding for district operations over the next fiscal year and are consistent with past City Council action. The action before City Council not only authorizes the levying and collection of the property tax assessment for the Landscape Maintenance Districts and the SBZs, but also authorizes the Director of Finance to transfer funds out of appropriated reserves in order to finance operational costs (unanticipated expenses or project overages) in the districts during the next fiscal year as identified by the Director of Recreation and Parks.

Fiscal Considerations:

The attached supportive documents present the specific financing related to each of the Landscape Maintenance District Assessments for the “Master Districts” and the SBZs.

To summarize, the Landscape Maintenance Districts and the SBZ’s generate approximately $5.6 million in revenue to fund direct maintenance services and district operation costs. This revenue is collected from approximately 9,888 residential and 615 commercial properties in the districts. Since everyone who lives in the City of Santa Maria benefits from the well-kept, public easement landscaped areas, the City’s General Fund pro vides a financial contribution, known as the “City’s General Benefit," in the amount of $928,780. This contribution is made on behalf of the estimated 23,500 (commercial and residential) properties that existed prior to the creation of the Landscape Maintenance Districts. As new development occurs in older parts of the City, those properties are annexed into a Landscape Maintenance District or SBZ, so over time the General Benefit will begin to diminish.

During F iscal Year 2024-25, the Landscape Maintenan ce Districts experienced an across-the-board increase in costs of providing daily operations, renovation and project management. The most significant cost is irrigation water. In order to control the cost of water, staff has reduced watering and, as budgets permit converted non-recreational turf to low water use plantings. These conversions will result in long-term savings but require a significant upfront expenditure. Accordingly, Landscape Maintenance Districts will continue to face increased costs.

In 2025, there will be additional revenue from the new projects at Centennial Gardens, Elements Mixed Use, Skyview Homes, and others, into their respective districts; however, there will also be additional costs associated with the new District Landscape

Impact to the Community:

Landscaping along the City’s major arterials and surrounding residential and commercial developments in the City are a positive indication of the fine quality of life in Santa Maria and it is aesthetically appealing to residents and visitors . Accordingly, the City’s landscaping provides for the community’s enjoyment, neighborhood cohesiveness, and beauty. And the assessments herein provide for perpetual care of these public areas and safeguard the assets of surrounding property owners.

Attachments:

A: Resolution- Intent to Levy and Collect
Exhibit A- Engineer Report Northwest
Exhibit B- Engineer Report Northeast
Exhibit C- Engineer Report Southwest
Exhibit D- Engineer Report South Miller Street- South College Drive Exhibit E- FY25-25 District Assessment Rolls
Exhibit F – Landscape Maintenance Districts Map

Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE INTENT TO

LEVY AND COLLECT THE PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS

FOR EACH OF THE FOUR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS AND THE 20 SPECIAL BENEFIT ZONES

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, at this time intends to levy and collect the fiscal year 2025 -26 assessments for the Northeast, Northwest, Southwest , and South Miller Street/South College Drive Landscape Maintenance Districts and the 20 Special Benefit Zones (“Districts”), and

WHEREAS, these assessments are pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22500, et seq . of the Streets and Highways Code); and

WHEREAS, all the properties af fected by these proceedings are described in Exhibit “E” and the boundaries of the Districts are shown on the map as Exhibit “F” incorporated herein by reference.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true; and

SECTION 2. It is the intention of this legislative body to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2025-26 to pay costs and expenses for the maintenance of retention basins, parks, sidewalks, public safety, graffiti abatement, pest abatement, appurtenant equipment/facilities, trees, and all other public thoroughfare landscaping , and

SECTION 3. By the terms of Resolution Numbers 1994-96, 1994-97, 1994-98 and 1994-99, dated June 7, 1994, the City Council adopted a formula for annual adjustment of assessments based on the Consumer Price Index Figures of the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics fo r Urban Los Angeles -Riverside-Orange County Areas*; and

SECTION 4. The Director of Finance is authorized and directed to receive appropriate assessments as reported in the Engineer’s Reports on Exhibit A -D incorporated herein by reference. Additionally, the Director of Finance is authorized and directed to reallocate said appropriations and estimated revenues to reflect the final assessments as determined by the County of Santa Barbara; and

SECTION 5. The improvements to be funded by the proposed assessm ent are generally described as follows: grounds maintenance of retention basins, parks, 2 sidewalks, public safety efforts, appurtenant equipment/facilities, public thoroughfare landscaping, trees, graffiti abatement, and pest abatement; and

SECTION 6. The assessment districts affected by this Resolution of Intention are distinctively designated as follows: South Miller Street/South College Drive, Northeast, Northwest, and Southwest Landscape Maintenance Districts, and the 20 Special Benefit Zones; and

SECTION 7. The properties affected by the proposed assessments are described in Exhibit “E”, and the boundaries of the Districts are shown on the map as Exhibit “F incorporated herein by reference; and

SECTION 8. Said work will provide a special and direct benefit to the properties as described in the Engineer’s Reports previously approved by this Council , incorporated herein by reference as Exhibits A through D; and

SECTION 9. The Director of Recreation and Parks or his designee is hereby authorized to a pprove the transfer of funds from appropriated reserve accounts for the purpose of covering operational costs when needed; and

SETION 10. The public notice given on May 6, 2025, that a public hearing on the questions of the proposed assessment was scheduled at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, which is located at 110 East Cook Street in Santa Maria, California, on Tuesday, June 3, 2025.

SECTION 11. The Engineer’s Reports pertaining to the proposed proceedings are on file with the Chief Deputy City Clerk and should be referred to for a full and detailed description of the improvements, Landscape Maintenance District Boundaries, and any Special Benefit Zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Districts.; and

SECTION 12. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

*U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for Urban Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County areas – includes Santa Maria Atty. Rev. 2025

3 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 6th day of May 2025.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________________
Department Director
_______________________________
City Manager
Exhibit A- Engineer Report Northwest
Exhibit B- Engineer Report Northeast
Exhibit C- Engineer Report Southwest
Exhibit D- Engineer Report South Miller Street- South College Drive Exhibit E- FY25-25 District Assessment Rolls
Exhibit F – Landscape Maintenance Districts Map

EXHIBIT A

Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026

Northwest Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No.

DS-9

Incorporating Special Benefit Zones:
 Cherry Blossom
 North Preisker Ranch

Intent Meeting: May 6, 2025

Public Hearing: June 3, 2025

City of Santa Maria
110 E. Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454

- 2 -

- 3 -

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
This Report and the enclosed descriptions, budgets and diagram outline the proposed improvements and assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-9 in the City of Santa Maria for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

- 4 -
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ . - 5 - Report Content and Annual Proceedings ................................ ....................... - 5 - PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ................................ ............................... - 9 - Zones of Benefit ................................ ................................ ........................... - 11 - Part II – Method of Apportionment ................................ ................................ - 12 - Benefit Analysis ................................ ................................ ............................ - 13 - Assessment Methodology ................................ ................................ ............ - 16 - Part III – Estimate of Costs ................................ ................................ .............. - 18 - Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) ................... - 20 - Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams................................ ................................ ..... - 21 - District Boundary Diagram ................................ ................................ ........... - 22 - District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section) ................................ ..... - 23 - District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section) ................................ ..... - 24 - Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone ................................ ........................... - 25 - North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone ................................ ................. - 26 - Part V - Assessment Rolls ................................ ................................ ................ - 27 -

- 5 -

INTRODUCTION

The City of Santa Maria (“City”), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Artic le XIIID (“California Constitution”) annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s maintenance assessment district designated as Northwest Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS -9 (hereafter referred to as “District”) to fund in whole or in part the maintenance and operation of landscaping improvements that provide special benefits to properties within the District.

The City Council on December 20, 1988, established the formation of the Northwest Landscape Maintenance District No . DS-9 for the purpose of financing the continued maintenance of the landscaping within the northwest quadrant of the City.

In accordance with the 1972 Act, the District also utilizes special benefit zones (“Zones”) to address variations in the nature, loc ation, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Within the boundaries of the District, some parcels may be assigned to a special benefit zone, each of which is associated with specific improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone that are in addition to the improvements proportionally shared by properties throughout the District.

Report Content and Annual Proceedings
This Engineer’s Annual Report (the “Report”) has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the proposed improvements and services to be provided within the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. This Report outlines the District improvements, the special benefit zones, the method of apportionment, and proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the special benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provi de a source of funding to fund in whole or in part, the continued operation and maintenance of the landscaping improvements and services to be provided by the District for the properties within the District and specified Zones for which the properties receive special benefits. - 6 -
Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the authorized District improvements and based upon available revenues including assessment revenues, fund balances, general benefit contributions and any additional City contributions from available sources. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; deficits or surpluses from prior years; revenues from other sources; and the collecti on of funds for operational reserves and/or periodic repairs, replacements and rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. The net annual cost to provide the improvements within the District plus each benefit Zone (if applicable) are allocated to the benefiting properties within the District and respective Zones as applicable, using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services. Thus, each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Office. The Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.

At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District and the ann ual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the City Council will by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

As required by the 1972 Act, this Engineer’s Report describes the improvements to be provided, maintained, and serviced by the District, an estimated budget for the District improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District for fiscal year 2025/2026.

Part I – Plans and Specifications: This section contains a general description of the District, special benefit zones (“Zones”), and the improvements and services that provide special benefits to the parcels within the District. The improvements, appurtenant facilities, and services that provide special benefits to the properties within the District and for which parcels are assessed may - 7 -
include, but not limited to the installation and maintenance of landscaping improvements within the public right-of-way of streets within the District, retention basins, parks, public facilities and related amenities as well as associated operational and incidental expenses, and the collection of fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements. In conjunction with these general descriptions, a visual depiction of the improvements may be provided in the District Diagrams contained in Part IV of this Report. More detailed information regarding the specific plans and specifications associated with the District improvements and Zone improvements are on file in the City Engineer’s Office and by reference are made part of this Report.

Part II – Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the special and general benefits associated with the improvements to be provided within the District (Benefit Analysis).

This section of the Report also outlines the basis upon which the estimated costs to provide such improvements has been apportioned to each parcel of land therein in proportion to the special benefits to be received. (the method of calculating each property’s proportional special benefit assessment). This method of apportionment is consistent with the previously approved and adopted method of apportionment for the District.

Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. In addition to the general benefit costs, the City may provide additional funding to support the maintenance and operation of the improvements considered to be of special benefit, but City staff shall make the determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues.

This section also identifies and outlines an Assessment Range Formula (inflationary adjust) previously approved and adopted for t he District assessments that provides for an annual adjustment to the maximum assessment rates, which establishes limits on future assessments, but also provides for reasonable cost adjustments due to inflation.

Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams: This section of the Report contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of the District and Zones for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the District improvements. These diagrams may also provide a visual depiction of the location of the improvements being maintained. The lines and - 8 -
dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in the District and Zone diagrams are inclusive of the parcels listed in “Part V - Assessment Roll” of this Report and the corresponding County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall incorporate all subsequent subdivisions, lot -line adjustments, or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District and Zones.

Part V – Assessment Roll : The assessment amounts to be levied and collected in fiscal year 2025/2026 for each parcel is based on the parcel’s calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in "Part II - Method of Apportionment" and the annual assessment rates established by the estimated budgets in "Part III - Estimate of Costs" of this Report. Due to the number of parcels within the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2025/2026 has been filed electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the listing of the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and t he corresponding assessment amounts are made part of this Report.

Note: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Engineer’s Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision o f any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Engineer’s Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

- 9 -
PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The purpose of this District is to provide in part through annual assessments, funding for the installation, operation, and maintenance of landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right -of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified publi c areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins that control subdivision water runoff, parks, and easements.

As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the District and associated with each Zone therein may incorporate various local landscaping improvements and related amenities that were either installed in direct connection with the development of properties within the District and each respective Zone or were installed for the benefit of those properties resulting fr om property development or potential development of those properties and are considered necessary elements for the development of such properties to their full and best use and these improvements are maintained and serviced for the special benefit of real property within the District and/or Zones. The work to be performed within the District and each respective Zone may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel, materials, equipment, electricity, water, contract services, repair and rehabilitation of the improvements and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide the improvements and services.

Improvements provided within the District and/or Zone may include but are not limited to landscaping and related facilities an d amenities located within designated street medians, parkway and streetscape side-panels, and entryways within the public right of ways or easements adjacent to public right of ways; and within public places including greenbelt areas, open spaces, and loc al parks within each respective Zone. These improvements may include, but are not limited to:
 various landscape materials such as trees, turf, shrubs, vines, ground cover, annual or perineal plantings;
 irrigation and drainage systems;
 structural amenities such as monuments, specialty or ornamental lighting, block walls, retaining walls, or other fencing associated with the landscape areas;  hardscapes including mulch, decomposed granite surfaces, stamped concrete, and pavers;  recreational amenities within pa rks or greenbelts that may include benches, play structures, picnic or other recreational facilities, signage, and related appurtenances.

The maintenance of these improvements may include, but is not limited to the regularly scheduled mowing, trimming, pru ning, fertilization, pest control, weed /graffiti abatement, and public safety; installation, removal, replacement and rehabilitation of the landscaping, repair or replacement of irrigation or landscape drainage systems; and repair or replacement of hardscape improvements including sidewalks and recreational amenities. The Recreation and Parks Office - 10 -
shall authorize and schedule such maintenance and servicing as needed and based on available District and/or Zone funding.

Reference is made to the plans and sp ecifications currently on file at the City Engineer's Office relating to the design, recommended materials, and level of maintenance concerning the facilities to be maintained. The plans show plant species, size, and their location. Specifications for the improvements comply with the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department, the 2019 California Building Code, and the Recreation and Parks Department Landscape and Irrigation Standards. For Fiscal Year 2025/2026 the improvements maintained within the District and for which parcels receive special benefits include but is not limited to the following:

NW LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. DS-9 TOTAL SQFT.

Hidden Pines – easement frontage 400-600 Hidden Pines Way 21,011 Oak Valley – Taylor frontage (does not include school); Rancho Verde, Via Establo to Blosser, North Railroad at the 1900 block between Rancho Verde

97,275
and Taylor
Blosser Medians – 100 North Blosser Road and 1100 West Main Street 2,392 Villas de la Sara – West Morrison and Oakley Avenue 6,340 Riverside Estates – frontage on Preisker Lane and Hidden Pines Way 8,412 Parkside – frontage on Preisker, parking lot, and playground 9,912 Parkside Basin— grassy basin at Portland Drive and Preisker 20,776 100 West Main Street – median 1,944
Railroad Median-Paved median 600
Cook Street Annex & Fire Station 1 9,945
Bradley Channel Multi-Purpose Trail – from Railroad to Preisker Park-all paved 14,000 Sanchez School – area from black rod iron fence to 3 feet east of the sidewalk on Depot 12,120
Blosser/Donovan Median – on Blosser south -paved median 1,610 Southeast corner of Depot and Morrison 1,500
Downtown medians – Broadway Medians from Fesler Street going south to the front of the Library; East and West Cook Street Medians; South Pine Street from Main Street to Cook Street; East Main Street Medians; 100 North McClelland Median; South Miller Medians from main Street to Cook Street
21,022
TCW – mall perimeter, some interior, and Ruffoni parking lot including Heritage Walk 88,352 Total Northwest Landscape Maintenance District No. DS-9 355,715

- 11 -
Zones of Benefit
In accordance with the 1972 Act, this District utilizes Zones to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Each Zone is associated with specific improvements and/or types of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.

For Fiscal Year 2025/2026 the District includes two (2) designated Zones. The boundaries of each Zone are based on the improvements to be maintained and the relationship and proximity of the developments and properties that derive special benefits from those specific improvements. The following is a bri ef description and summary of the improvements associated within each Zone and for which parcels receive special benefits:

Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone include landscaped medians, landscaped open space, the park site, and specialty lighting associated with the frontages on Railroad and Hidden pines totaling and estimated 51,900 square feet of improvements.

Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, gr affiti removal, renovation, utility costs, public safety, and District administration. The Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2025/2026 will be $ 520.14 per assessor parcel number. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.

The Cherry Blossom Special Benefit parcels are also assessed the Northwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $ 177.88 per assessment unit as de tailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.

North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone include landscaped roundabouts, landscaped medians, landscaped open space, the park site, and specialty lighting associated with the frontages on Atlantic, Blosser (both sides), Canal (both sides), Railroad (up to wall), Boxcar and Caboose, path on Eagleton, both roundabouts and all entry medians totaling and estimated 243,867 square feet of improvements.

Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, public safety, and District administration. The North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone Assessment f or fiscal year 202 5/2026 will be $ 383.82 per assessor parcel - 12 -
number. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.

The North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit parcels have both commercial and residential components. These parcels are also assessed either the Northwest Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $177.88 per assessment unit or the commercial assessment of $569.22 per APN or tenant space as detailed in the Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.

Note: A visual depiction of the general location of the landscape improvement areas for the District and Zone boundaries are provided on the District Diagrams provided in Part IV of this Report.

Part II – Method of Apportionment

The improvements provided by this District and for which properties are assessed are identified as local landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right-of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified public areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins, parks, easements, and related amenities. The formulas used for calculating assessments and the designation of Zones herein reflect the composition of parcels within the District and the improvements and activities to be provided and have been designed to fairly apportion the cost of providing the improvements based on a determination of the proportional special benefits to each parcel.

Provisions of the 1972 Act
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, including the acquisition, construction, installation and servicing of landscape improvements and related facilities. The 1972 Act requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:

Section 22573 defines the net amount to be assessed as follows:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” - 13 -

Section 22574 provides for zones as follows:
“The diagram and assessment may classify various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements.”

Provisions of the California Constitution
In addition to the provisions of the 1972 Act, the Article XIII D of the California Constitution outlines specific requirements regarding assessments including the following:

Article XIII D Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”Article XIII D Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”

Benefit Analysis

Special Benefits
The ongoing maintenance of landscaped areas within the District as addressed in this Report, provide aesthetic benefits to the properties and a more pleasant environment to walk, drive, live, and/or work. The primary function of these landscape improvements and related amenities is to serve as an aesthetically pleasing enhancement and green space for the benefit of the immediately surrounding properties and developments for which the impr ovements - 14 -
were constructed and installed and/or were facilitated by the development or potential development of properties within the District and each respective Zone. In addition, the District provided landscaping improvements are an integral part of the physical environment associated with the parcels in the District and/or respective Zones and the proportional direct effect that trees, shrubs, and groundcover have on real property within the district including localized wind reduction; erosion control; storm water capture; noise attenuation; visual screening; ultraviolet light and glare reduction; and odor reduction are a direct and particular benefit to the properties in proximity to those improvements.

While some of the improvements may in part be visible to properties outside the District or Zone, collectively if these various improvements are not properly maintained, it is the parcels within the District and/or respective Zone (as may be applicable), that would be aesthetically burdened or environ mentally impacted. Additionally, much of the landscaping within the street right-of-way serve as both a physical buffer as well as a sound reduction buffer between the roadways and the properties in the District and serve as a pleasant aesthetic amenity that enhances the approach to the parcels.

General Benefit
In reviewing the location and extent of the specific landscaped areas and improvements to be funded by District assessments and the proximity and relationship to properties to be assessed it is evident these improvements were primarily installed in connection with the development of properties therein or are improvements that would otherwise be shared by and required for development of properties in the District or Zone. It is also evident that t he maintenance these improvements and the level of maintenance provided has a direct and particular impact (special benefit) only to those properties in proximity to those improvements and such maintenance beyond that which is required to ensure the safety and protection of the general public and property in general, has no direct quantifiable benefit to the public at large or properties outside the District and/or Zones.

In the absence of a special funding District or Zones, the City would typically be obl igated to provide only limited (as needed) tree management, weed abatement, rodent control, and erosion control services for the landscape areas currently maintained within the District. This baseline level of service (general benefit level of service) would most likely provide for periodic servicing of the improvement areas on an as -needed basis to ensure public safety and essential property protection to avoid negative impacts on adjacent roadways an d vehicles traveling on those roadways, and potential property damage resulting from erosion or fire hazards. However, this baseline level of service would clearly result in a far less visually pleasing environment than is created with the enhanced levels of services associated with the regular landscape maintenance provided in the District and funded by the special benefit assessments In addition to the baseline level of service general benefit, it is recognized that there are indirect or incidental general benefits to properties within the District as well as the general public that are associated with - 15 -
regular landscape maintenance services associated with the districtwide improvements, including minimization of dust and debris, and air pollution reduction.

Although these types of benefits might best be characterized as indirect consequences of the special benefit of the landscape maintenance provided to parcels served by the District, for the purposes of this Report we assume these types of benefits to be general benefits, albeit general benefits that are extremely difficult to quantify. Therefore, on behalf of all parcels not assessed by a landscape maintenance district, yet deriving some level of general benefit from the District’s landscaped improvements , the City has historically and will continue to contribute from the general fund a General Benefit Contribution that equals or exceeds the costs attributable to the baseline general benefit costs and indirect/incidental general benefit costs for the distr ictwide shared improvement areas as shown in the Estimate of Costs (Part III of this Report) as the “City General Benefit Contribution”.

- 16 -
Assessment Methodology
To assess benefits equitably it is necessary to calculate each property’s proportional share of the special benefits conferred by the funded improvements and service. The method utilized to determine assessments is called the “method of apportionment” or form ula of cost spread ("spread formula"). Assessment Units (“AU”), often referred to as the Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of assessment apportionment is utilized for this District and establishes a basic unit (base value) of benefit and then calculates the benefit derived by each assessed parcel as a multiple (or a fraction) of that basic unit. The AU or EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under t he 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of comparable property characteristics which may include but is not limited to land use and property size.

The method of apportionment originally developed for t his District was based on an assessment spread formula appropriate for the various land uses, identifiable property characteristics and improvements within the District and utilizes an assigned number of comparative dwelling units for residential, non-residential, and undeveloped properties.

The majority of parcels within the District are residential parcels and the improvements are maintained to provide a uniform benefit within the boundaries of the District. Therefore, each dwelling unit, whether an apart ment or single family residence is given a base value of one (1) unit.

Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the basic unit.

The assignment of unit values is based primarily on the intensity of land use and i ts comparison to the base unit. Two unit values have been assigned: a residential efficiency unit, 500 square feet or less, at 50 percent of the residential unit value and a commercial efficiency unit defined at 1200 square feet per commercial charge.

Land Use Classifications
Every parcel within the District is assigned a land use classification based on available parcel information obtained from the County Assessor’s Office. It has been determined that a parcel use and size are the appropriate factors ne cessary to identify and calculate the proportional special benefits conveyed to each property within the District for the cost of improvements associated with that property. The following are typical site land uses described in Title 12 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code and their proposed Assessment Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City of Santa Maria and is applied in the calculation of the 2025/2026 fiscal year assessments.

A summary of the applied Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) for the various land use classifications within the District is shown in the following table:

- 17 -

LAND USE ASSESSMENT UNITS
Residential
 Single Family Residential
 Two Family Residential
 Condominium/Townhouse
 Apartment Residential
 Mobile Home Parks
 Efficiency Unit

1 Unit per property
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
1 Unit per dwelling
.5 Unit per dwelling

Commercial
 Small, Single Tenant
 Efficiency Unit > 1,200 SF
 Vacant > 10,000 SF
 Commercial Centers
 Major Shopping Centers

1 Unit per property
1 Unit per 1,200 SF
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property

Trade/Services
 Commercial/Professional Office
 Vacant > 25,000 SF
 Mid-Size Office
 Major Office Buildings
 Hospital/Large Medical Offices

1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property
7 Units per property

Industrial
 Small Industrial
 Vacant > 50,000 SF
 Medium Industrial
 Major Industrial

1 Unit per property
1 Unit per property
4 Units per property
7 Units per property

Exempt
 Open Space/Common Areas, Public Facilities, Parks,
Redevelopment Agency

0 Units per property

- 18 -
Part III – Estimate of Costs

The following budgets outline the estimated costs to maintain and service the various landscaping improvements described in this Report for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.

The budgeted expenses outlined in the following pages for the District and the Zones therein reflect the estimated annual expenses required to support and maintain the improvements to be provided for fiscal year 2025/2026. The estimated annual expenses provided in the budgets are considered to be appropriate full -service level costs. These full -service expenses, minus the general benefit expenses (Expenses not assessed and identified as the City’s financial obligation to support the improvements) result in the amount of funding the property owners should reasonably be assessed to fully fund their proportional special benefit from the improvements to be maintained (“Special Benefit Expenses”).

CITY OF SANTA MARIA
NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. DS-9

ESTIMATED BUDGET

2024/2025 2025/2026

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $74,850 $74,850
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $155,355 $174,971
Administration $242,126 $242,126
Total Expenditures
$472,331

$491,947

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Assessment $353,005 $368,564
City General Benefit Contribution $119,326 $123,383
Total Revenues $472,331 $491,947

- 19 -
CHERRY BLOSSOM SBZ 2024/2025 2025/2026

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities

$26,697

$26,697
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $33,205 $35,031
Administration $8,510 $8,510
Total Expenditures
$68,412

$71,435

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $68,412 $71,435
Total Revenues $68,412 $71,435

NORTH PREISKER RANCH SBZ 2024/2025 2025/2026

ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Utilities $69,132 $69,132
Contract, Supplies, Renovation $149,946 $161,222
Administration $32,219 $32,219
Total Expenditures
$251,297

$266,019

ESTIMATED REVENUES
Special Benefit Assessment $251,297 $266,019
Total Revenues $251,297 $266,019

- 20 -
Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) Pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), any “new or increased assessments” require certain noticing and balloting requirements. However, Government Code Section 54954.6(a) provides that a “new or increased assessment” does not include “an assessment which does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments...previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the as sessment is imposed.” This definition of a new or increased assessment is reaffirmed in the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, Government Code Section 53753.5.

As previously adopted and approved by the City Council, each fiscal year the maximum assessment rates established for the improvements in the previous fiscal year for the District and each Zone may be adjusted by the percentage increase of the Local Consumer Price Index (CPI). The Consumer Price Index used for the inflationary adjustment s hall be for the Los Angeles - Riverside-Orange County Area for All Urban Consumers, as developed by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI used shall be as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for a similar period of time.

Each fiscal year the City shall identify the annual percentage change in the CPI, using the difference over a 12-month period between the current year and of the previous year as of January of each succeeding year. This percentage difference shall then establish the range of inc rease to the maximum assessment rates allowed. If the percentage change in the CPI is negative, the maximum assessment rates shall not be adjusted from the previous fiscal year (unchanged). Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discont inue the preparation of such index, the City may use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.

The percentage change in CPI from December 202 3 to December 2024 as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics was 3.4 percent. Therefore, the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2025/2026 will be increased by 3.4 percent over the maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2024/2025. - 21 -
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams
The following section contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of Santa Maria Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-9 and the Zones therein for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. In addition to depicting the boundaries of the Zones, the diagram s also provide a visual depiction of the general location of the improvement areas being funded and maintained within the Distr ict and Zones. All parcels that will receive a special benefit from the improvements provided within the District and each respective Zone consist of the lots, parcels and subdivisions of land within the boundaries of the District and/or Zones as depicted by these diagrams and the lines and dimensions of those lots, parcels and subdivisions of land shall be those lines and dim ensions shown on the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s parcel maps for the current fiscal year and by reference the Santa Barbara County Assessor’ s parcel maps are incorporated herein and made part of this Report. These diagrams along with the Assessment Roll incorporated in Part V of this Report constitute the District Assessment Diagram for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.

- 22 -
District Boundary Diagram

- 23 -
District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section)

- 24 -
District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section)

- 25 -
Cherry Blossom Special Benefit Zone

- 26 -
North Preisker Ranch Special Benefit Zone

- 27 -

Part V - Assessment Rolls

Due to the number of parcels in the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 202 5/2026 (a listing of the parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts) has been filed with the City Clerk in an electronic format and is, by reference, made part of this Report. The proposed Assessment Roll shall be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal office hours.

The Assessment Roll identified the parcels within the District that are assessed for special benefits and their corresponding assessment amount(s) for fiscal year 202 5/2026. Each par cel listed on the Assessment Roll is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor's Roll and the County Assessor’s Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County A ssessor's Office securing the final roll and generating tax bills for fiscal year 202 5/2026.

EXHIBIT B

Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Northeast Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No.

DS-10

Incorporating Special Benefit Zones:
 Rivergate Roemer
 Suey and Donovan
 Donovan Estates
 La Ventana

Intent Meeting: May 6, 2025

Public Hearing: June 3, 2025

City of Santa Maria
110 E. Cook Street
Santa Maria, CA 93454

- 2 -

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
This Report and the enclosed descriptions, budgets and diagram outline the proposed improvements and assessments for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS-10 in the City of Santa Maria for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and d imensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

- 3 -

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ .............................. - 5 - Report Content and Annual Proceedings ................................ ..................... - 5 - PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ................................ ............................. - 9 - Zones of Benefit ................................ ................................ ........................ - 11 - Part II – Method of Apportionment ................................ .............................. - 14 - Benefit Analysis................................ ................................ ......................... - 15 - Assessment Methodology ................................ ................................ ......... - 17 - Part III – Estimate of Costs ................................ ................................ ............ - 19 - Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula)................... - 22 - Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams ................................ ................................ .. - 23 - District Boundary Diagram ................................ ................................ ........ - 24 - District Improvement Diagram (Northern Section) ................................ .... - 25 - District Improvement Diagram (Southern Section) ................................ .... - 26 - Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone ................................ .................... - 27 - Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone ................................ ..................... - 28 - Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone ................................ ....................... - 29 - La Ventana Special Benefit Zone................................ ................................ - 30 - Part V - Assessment Rolls ................................ ................................ ............. - 31 -

- 4 -

- 5 -

INTRODUCTION

The City of Santa Maria (“City”), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and in accordance with the provisions of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID (“California Constitution”) annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s maintenance assessment district designated as Northe ast Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No. DS -10 (hereafter referred to as “District”) to fund in whole or in part the maintenance and operation of landscaping improvements that provide special benefits to properties within the District.

The City Council on May 2 , 198 9, established the formation of the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District No. DS -10 for the purpose of financing the continued maintenance of the landscaping within the northeast quadrant of the City.

In accordance with the 1972 Act, the District also utilizes special benefit zones (“Zones”) to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Within the boundaries of the District, some parcels may be assigned to a special benefit zone, each of which is associated with specific improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone that are in addition to the improvements proportionally shared by properties throughout the District.

Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the authorized District improvements and based upon available revenues including assessment revenues, fund balances, general benefit contributions and any additional City contributions from ava ilable sources. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incide ntal expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; deficits or surpluses from prior years; revenues from other sources; and the collection of funds for operational reserves and/or periodic repairs, replacements and rehabilitatio n projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. The net annual cost to provide the improvements within the District plus each benefit Zone (if applicable) are allocated to the benefiting properties within the District and respective Zones as applicable, using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improve ments and services. Thus, each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property as signed its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Office. The Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.

At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District and the annual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the City Council will by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

As required by the 1972 Act, this Engi neer’s Report describes the improvements to be provided, maintained, and serviced by the District, an estimated budget for the District improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District for fiscal year 2025/2026.

- 7 -
Part I – Plans and Specifications: This section contains a general description of the District, special benefit zones (“Zones”), and the improvements and services that provide special benefits to the parcels within the District. The improvements, appurtenant facilities, and services that provide special benefits to the properties within the District and for which parcels are assessed may include, but not limited to the installation and maintenance of landscaping improvements within the public right-of-way of streets within the District, retention basins, parks, public facilities and related amenities as well as associated operational and incidental expenses, and the collection of fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements. In conjunction with these general descriptions, a visual depiction of the improvements may be provided in the District Diagram s contained in Part IV of this Report. More detailed information regarding the specific plans and specifications associated with the District improvements and Zone improvements are on file in the City Engineer’s Office and by reference are made part of this Report.

Part II – Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the special and general benefits associated with the improvements to be provided within the District (Benefit Analysis).

Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit sh all be funded by a City contribution. In addition to the general benefit costs, the City may provide additional funding to support the maintenance and operation of the improvements considered to be of special benefit, but City staff shall make the determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues.

- 8 -
Part IV – District/Zone Diagrams: This section of the Report contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of the District and Zones for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the District improvements. These diagrams may also provide a visual depiction of the location of the improvements being maintained. The lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in the District and Zone diagram s are inclusive of the parcels listed in “Part V - Assessment Roll” of this Report and the corresponding County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall incorporate all subsequent subdivisions, lot -line adjustments, or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District and Zones.

Note: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Engineer’s Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Engineer’s Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective o f the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

- 9 -
PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The purpose of this District is to provide in part through annual assessments, funding for the installation, operation, and maintenance of landscaping improvements in specified parkways, medians, and roundabouts in the public right -of-way including street trees, and landscaping within specified pub lic areas and public facilities including storm water retention basins that control subdivision water runoff, parks, and easements.

As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the District and associated with each Zone therein may incorpora te various local landscaping improvements and related amenities that were either installed in direct connection with the development of properties within the District and each respective Zone or were installed for the benefit of those properties resulting from property development or potential development of those properties and are considered necessary elements for the development of such properties to their full and best use and these improvements are maintained and serviced for the special benefit of rea l property within the District and/or Zones. The work to be performed within the District and each respective Zone may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel, materials, equipment, electricity, water, contract services, repair and rehabilitation of the improvements and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide the improvements and services.

Improvements provided within the District and/or Zone may include but are not limited to landscaping and related facilities and amenities located within designated street medians, parkway and streetscape side-panels, and entryways within the public right of ways or easements adjacent to public right of ways; and within public places including greenbelt areas, open spaces, and l ocal parks within each respective Zone. These improvements may include, but are not limited to:
 various landscape materials such as trees, turf, shrubs, vines, ground cover, annual or perineal plantings;
 irrigation and drainage systems;
 structural amenities such as monuments, specialty or ornamental lighting, block walls, retaining walls, or other fencing associated with the landscape areas;  hardscapes including mulch, decomposed granite surfaces, stamped concrete, and pavers;  recreational amenities within parks or greenbelts that may include benches, play structures, picnic or other recreational facilities, signage, and related appurtenances.

The maintenance of these improvements may include, but is not limited to the regularly scheduled mowing, trimming, p runing, fertilization, pest control, weed /graffiti abatement, and Public Safety; installation, removal, replacement and rehabilitation of the landscaping, repair or replacement of irrigation or landscape drainage systems; and repair or replacement of hardscape improvements including sidewalks and recreational amenities. The Recreation and Parks Office - 10 -
shall authorize and schedule such maintenance and servicing as needed and based on available District and/or Zone funding.

Reference is made to the plans and specifications currently on file at the City Engineer's Office relating to the design, recommended materials, and level of maintenance concerning the facilities to be maintained. The plans show plant species, size, and their location. Specifications for th e improvements comply with the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department, the 2019 California Building Code, and the Recreation and Parks Department Landscape and Irrigation Standards. For Fiscal Year 2025/2026 the improvements maintained with in the District and for which parcels receive special benefits include but is not limited to the following:

NE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. DS -10 TOTAL SQFT.

Emerald Park – Shrubs on College near Donovan 8,893
Emerald Basin – Grassy basin on College near Donovan 11,547 Donovan Medians 9,504
Riverside Terrace – 1800 block of Bayview Drive, open space on Seaward and around Basin on Kathryn 134,777
Riverside Basin – Grassy basin on Kathryn 24,686
Shields/Cochiolo – 1600 block Suey Road - frontage on Suey and Donovan, frontage on Antone and Floyd Court 61,476
Suey Basin – Grassy basin on Suey near Antone 14,774
Sierra Vista – frontage on Panther and Centennial, basin at the corner of Panther and Centennial and the breezeway off Mammoth 40,000
Rowland Estates – Shrubs and playground. 12,332
Rowland Basin – includes weedy basin 4,656
Canyon Homes – 1400 East Donovan Road entrance 3,764
Olive Garden – 1200 South Bradley median 2,900
Hancock College – 800 South Bradley median 3,064
Bradley Easement – south of Main Street to Jones Street 14,718 Transit Center 70,993
Hancock Terrace Bike Path-Miller to College 30,000
800 E Jones median-Paved island 462
Pepper Tree Medians – north of Donovan Road on Broadway 3,456 Stowell Road Easement – east of Miller Street 13,492
Alvin Overpass 59,513
North Bradley Ivy – Fesler Junior High easement area 15,493 Donovan/Miller Median 10,310
Via Rubio – Jewel Street only 4,836
Donovan Overpass 67,751
Pepperwood Median 1,819
East Main Street & 101-weedy shoulders 7,301
- 11 -
Bradley at Elks 22,310
Downtown medians – Broadway Medians from Fesler Street going south to the front of the Library; East and West Cook Street Medians; South Pine Street from Main Street to Cook Street; East Main Street Medians; 100 North McClelland Median; South Miller Medians from Main Street to Cook Street
21,022
TCE - mall perimeter includes bus turnout, theater, Macy's parking lot and pocket park at Main & Broadway 186,393
Fire Station # 5 32,997
Total Northeast Landscape Maintenance District No. DS -10 895,239

Zones of Benefit
In accordance with the 1972 Act, this District utilizes Zones to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of improvements that provide special benefits to specific parcels and developments within the District. Each Zone is associated with specific improvements and/or types of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.

For Fiscal Year 2025/2026 the District includes four (4) designated Zones. The boundaries of each Zone are based on the improvements to be maintained and the relationship and proximity of the developments and properties that derive special benefits from those specific improvements. The following is a brief description and summary of the improvements associated within each Zone and for which parcels receive special benefits :

Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone
Improvements associated with the Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone include the landscaped medians on Donavan between Suey and Suey Crossing totaling an estimated 33,725 square feet of which 40 percent is hardscape (13,490 square feet) and 60 percent is irrigated turf, trees, and shrubs (20,235 square feet).

Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materi als and supplies, renovation, utility costs, and District administration. The Suey and Donovan Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2025/2026 will be $2 96.14 per dwelling unit. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.

The Suey and Donovan Special Benefit parcels are also assessed the North east Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $ 306.50 per assessment unit or the commercial assessment of $7 58.23 per APN or tenant space as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.
- 12 -

Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone
The developments in the Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone include College Estates I and II, Princess Estates I, II and III, and River Oaks North. Improvements for the Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone include the landscaped medians, la ndscaped open space, the park site/basin, and specialty lighting associated with the medians and frontage easements of River Oaks North, College Estates, and Princess Estates including Seaward, Paden, Carlotti, Borges, the Bradley Channel, and the walled area behind the homes on Mariah totaling an estimated 163,936 square feet of improvement area.

Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, public safety, and District administration. The Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit Zone Assessment will be $ 268.71 per parcel for fiscal year 2025/2026. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.

The Rivergate Roemer Special Benefit parcels are also assessed the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $ 306.50 per assessment unit or the commercial assessment of $ 758.23 per APN or tenant space as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.

Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone
The improvements that are associated with the Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone include the public easement areas along Donovan Road frontage (25,586 square feet), the park site and retardation basin (11,652 square feet) collectively totaling an estimated 37,238 square feet of improvements that includes the maintenance of the tot lot, street trees, public safety, and anti- graffiti measures as necessary.

Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, public safety, and District administration. The Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone Assessment will be $337.57 per parcel for fiscal year 2025/2026. This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.

The Donovan Estates Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $306.50 per assessment unit as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.

La Ventana Special Benefit Zone
- 13 -
The developments in this zone include La Ventana and Legacy. The improvements that are associated with La Ventana Special Benefit Zone include the public easement frontage areas along Main Street and Panther Drive to Willingham, Dressler, interior street enhancements and shrub portion of basin (106,042 square feet) and the weedy portion of the retention basin (45,112 square feet) collectively totaling an estimated 151,154 square feet of improvements that includes the maintenance of specialty lighting, street trees, public safety, and anti-graffiti measures as necessary.

Maintenance costs include labor, equipment, plant materials and supplies, graffiti removal, renovation, utility costs, public safety, and District administration. The La Ventana Special Benefit Zone Assessment for fiscal year 2025/2026 will be $476.99 per assessor parcel number .

This Zone assessment is imposed only upon parcels that receive a special benefit over and above general benefits provided to other parcels located in the District.

The La Ventana Special Benefit Zone parcels are also assessed the Northeast Landscape Maintenance District residential assessment of $306.50 per assessment unit or tenant space as detailed in Method of Apportionment provided in Part II of this Report.

Note: A visual depiction of the general location of the landscape improvement areas for the District and Zone boundaries are provided on the District Diagrams provided in Part IV of this Report.

- 14 -
Part II – Method of Apportionment

Article XIII D Section 2d defines District as follows:
- 15 -
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;

Benefit Analysis

Special Benefits
The ongoing maintenance of landscaped areas within the District as addressed in this Report, provide aesthetic benefits to the properties and a more pleasant environment to walk, drive, live, and/or work. The primary function of these landscape improvements and related amenities is to serve as an aesthetically pleasing enhancement and green space for the benefit of the immediately surrounding properties and developments for which the improvements were constructed and installed and/or were facilitated by the development or potential development of properties within the District and each respective Zone. In addition, the District provided landscaping improvements are an integral part of the physical environment associated with the parcels in the District and/or respective Zones and the proportional direct effect that trees, shrubs, and groundcover have on real property within the district including localized wind reduction; erosion control; storm water capture; noise attenuation; visual screening; ultraviolet light and glare reduction; and odor reduction are a direct and particular benefit to the properties in proximity to those improvements.

While some of the improvements may in part be visible to properties outside the District or Zone, collectively if these various improvements are not properly maintained, it is the parcels within the District and/or respective Zone (as may be applicable), that would be aesthetically burdened or environmentally impacted. Additionally, much of the landscaping within the street right-of-way serve as both a physical buffer as well as a sound reduction buffer between the roadways and the properties in the District and serve as a pleasant aesthetic amenity that - 16 -
enhances the approach to the parcels.

General Benefit
In reviewing the location and extent of the specific landscaped areas and improvements to be funded by District assessments and the proximity and relationship to properties to be assessed it is evident these improvements were primarily installed in connection with the development of properties therein or are improvements that would otherwise be shared by and required for development of properties in the District or Zone. It is also evident that the maintenance these improvements and the level of maintenance provided has a direct and particular impact (special benefit) only to those properties in proximity to those improvements and such maintenance beyond that which is required to ensure the safety and protection of the general public and property in general, has no direct quantifiable benefit to the public at large or properties outside the District and/or Zones.

In the absence of a special funding District or Zones, the City would typically be obligated to provide only limited (as needed) tree management, weed abatement, rodent control, and erosion control services for the landscape areas currently maintained within the District. This baseline level of service (general benefit level of service) would most likely provide for periodic servicing of the improvement areas on an as -needed basis to ensure public safety and essential property protection to avoid negative impacts on adjacent roadways and vehicles traveling on those roadways, and potential property damage resulting from erosion or fire hazards. However, this baseline level of service would clearly result in a far less visually pleasin g environment than is created with the enhanced levels of services associated with the regular landscape maintenance provided in the District and funded by the special benefit assessments In addition to the baseline level of service general benefit, it is recognized that there are indirect or incidental general benefits to properties within the District as well as the general public that are associated with regular landscape maintenance services associated with the districtwide improvements, including minimization of dust and debris, and air pollution reduction.

Although these types of benefits might best be characterized as indirect consequences of the special benefit of the landscape maintenance provided to parcels served by the District, for the purposes of this Report we assume these types of benefits to be general benefits, albeit general benefits that are extremely difficult to quantify. Therefore, on behalf of all parcels not assessed by a landscape maintenance district, yet deriving some level of general benefit from the District’ s landscaped improvements, the City has historically and will continue to contribute from the general fund a General Benefit Contribution that equals or exceeds the costs attributable to the baseline general benefit costs and indirect/incidental general benefit costs for the districtwide shared improvement areas as shown in the Estimate of Costs (Part III of this Report) as the “City General Benefit Contribution”.

- 17 -
Assessment Methodology
To assess benefits equitably it is necessary to calculate each property’s proportional share of the special benefits conferred by the funded improvements and service. The method utilized to determine assessments is called the “method of apportionment” or formula of cost spread ("spread formula"). Assessment Units (“AU”), often referred to as the Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of assessment apportionment is utilized fo r this District and establishes a basic unit (base value) of benefit and then calculates the benefit derived by each assessed parcel as a multiple (or a fraction) of that basic unit. The AU or EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of comparable property characteristics which may include but is not limited to land use and property size.

The method of apportionment originally developed for this District was based on an assessment spread formula appropriate for the various land uses, identifiable property characteristics and improvements within the District and utilizes an assigned number of comparative dwelling units for residential, non-residential, and undeveloped properties.

The majority of parcels within the District are residential parcels and the improvements are maintained to provide a uniform benefi t within the boundaries of the District. Therefore, each dwelling unit, whether an apartment or single family residence is given a base value of one (1) unit.

Parcels in other land use categories were then evaluated and rated by comparison with the basic unit.

The assignment of unit values is based primarily on the intensity of land use and its comparison to the base unit. Two unit values have been assigned: a residential efficiency unit, 500 square feet or less, at 50 percent of the residential unit value and a commercial efficiency unit defined at 1200 square feet per commercial charge.

Land Use Classifications
Every parcel within the District is assigned a land use classification based on available parcel information obtained from the County Assessor’s Office. It has been determined that a parcel use and size are the appropriate factors necessary to identify and calculate the proportional special benefits conveyed to each property within the District for the cost of improvements associated with that property. The following are typical site land uses described in Title 12 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code and their proposed Assessment Units. This list includes the majority of parcel uses within the City of Santa Maria and is applied in the calculation of t he 2025/2026 fiscal year assessments.

A summary of the applied Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) for the various land use classifications within the District is shown in the following table:

- 18 -