Santa Maria City Council
May 5, 2026

Attachment B
Access Central Coast
$15,824
Alliance for Pharmaceutical Access
$17,861
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Central Coast
$15,824
Community Partners in Caring
$17,861
Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse (CADA)
$15,824
Family Service Agency - Long Term Care Ombudsman
$15,824
Fighting Back Santa Maria Valley
$15,824
Good Samaritan Shelter - Freedom Warming Center
$15,824
Good Samaritan Shelter - Homeless Shelter Programs
$15,824
Meals on Wheels Santa Maria Valley Inc.
$17,861
North County Rape Crisis & Child Protection Center
$17,861
SMOOTH, Inc.
$15,824
Teddy Bear Cancer Foundation
$15,824

TOTAL CDBG PUBLIC SERVICES ALLOCATION
$213,860
SECTION 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute the necessary documents on behalf of the City of Santa Maria for application of the funds; and
SECTION 3. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to make minor changes to the Annual Action Plan to expedite the use of funding so long as the changes follow the City's CDBG Citizen Participation Plan; and SECTION 4. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance with the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 5th day of May 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

BY:

BY:

Department Director
City Manager

Attachment C
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

APPROVING THE CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AND

ALLOCATIONS UNDER THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

GRANT PROGRAM INCORPORATED IN THE ANNUAL ACTION
PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria is eligible for Federal funding in the amount of $1,425,736 during Fiscal Year 2026-27 for the 52nd consecutive year under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, and is reprogramming unexpended funds from prior fiscal years; and
WHEREAS, $926,729 or approximately 65 percent of the City's Fiscal Year 2026- 27 CDBG Entitlement, may be used for Capital activities; and WHEREAS, public input has been solicited and received per the City's adopted Citizen Participation Plan and Federal regulations; and WHEREAS, Federal regulations require that at least two meetings be held to obtain residents' views and responses to proposals and questions; and WHEREAS, two public hearings were held, one on July 14, 2025, and one on April 7, 2026, at which time comments and proposals were heard from the public; and WHEREAS, staff analyzed the eligibility of all proposed activities for the use of CDBG Program funds; and
WHEREAS, the Block Grants Advisory Committee and Community Programs Division staff presented a recommendation to the City Council for the allocation of funds for specific activities under the CDBG Program for Fiscal Year 2026-27; and WHEREAS, notices of all public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The following allocations are approved and incorporated in the Annual Action Plan for the use of Fiscal Year 2026-27 Federal funds under the CDBG program:
///
///

Attachment C
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS (Inc'I 5 percent Project Delivery Cost) City of SM / Rec & Parks / Community Sports Complex
$ 906,729

TBRA ADMINISTRATION
$ 20,000

TOTAL CDBG CAPITAL ALLOCATION
$ 926,729
SECTION 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute the necessary documents on behalf of the City of Santa Maria for application of the funds; and
SECTION 3. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to make minor changes to the Annual Action Plan to expedite the use of funding so long as the changes follow the City's CDBG Citizen Participation Plan; and SECTION 4. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance with the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 5th day of May 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

Attachment D
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

APPROVING THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ACTIVITIES AND

ALLOCATIONS UNDER THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

GRANT PROGRAM INCORPORATED IN THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria is eligible for Federal funding in the amount of $1,425,736 during Fiscal Year 2026-27 for the 52nd consecutive year under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and is reprogramming unexpended funds; and
WHEREAS, $285,147 or 20 percent of the City's Fiscal Year 2026-27 CDBG Entitlement may be used for general administration activities; and WHEREAS, $15,000 of that $285,147 will be used for Fair Housing activities as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and WHEREAS, $270,147 will be left for general administration activities and will be used to cover the staff's expenses in managing the CDBG funding; and WHEREAS, public input has been solicited and received per the City's adopted Citizen Participation Plan and Federal regulations; and WHEREAS, Federal regulations require that at least two meetings be held to obtain residents' views and responses to proposals and questions; and WHEREAS, two public hearings were held, one on July 14, 2025, and one on April 7, 2026, at which time comments and proposals were heard from the public; and WHEREAS, staff analyzed the eligibility of all proposed activities for the use of CDBG Program funds; and
WHEREAS, the Block Grants Advisory Committee and Community Programs Division staff presented a recommendation to the City Council for the allocation of funds for specific activities under the CDBG Program for Fiscal Year 2026-27; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The following allocations are approved and incorporated in the Annual Action Plan for the use of Fiscal Year 2026-27 Federal funds under the CDBG program:
///
///

Attachment D
General Administration
$ 270,147
Fair Housing
$ 15,000
GRAND TOTAL 2025-26 CDBG GENERAL ADMIN/FAIR HOUSING
$ 285,147
SECTION 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute the necessary documents on behalf of the City of Santa Maria for application of the funds; and
SECTION 3. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to make minor changes to the Annual Action Plan to expedite the use of funding so long as the changes follow the City's CDBG Citizen Participation Plan; and SECTION 4. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance with the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 5th day of May 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Chief Deputy City Clerk

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Chenin Dow, Community Development Director
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution to Award a Professional Services Agreement to MDG Associates, Inc. for Grants Compliance Management for the Santa Maria Sports Complex Project
Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement to MDG Associates, Inc for Grants Compliance Management for the Santa Maria Sports Complex Project.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Adopt a Resolution awarding a Professional Services Agreement to MDG Associates, Inc. for Grants Compliance Management for the Santa Maria Sports Complex Project in an amount of $100,000; and

2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the agreement.

BACKGROUND:

In January 2026, the City of Santa Maria issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking qualified firms or individuals to provide Grants Compliance Management Services for the multi -funded Sports Complex Project. The project is supported by local, state, and federal sources, each with unique compliance requirements and spending timelines. The selected Grants Compliance Manager will be responsible solely for grants administration, compliance monitoring, reporting, fiscal oversight, and grant closeout. This role does not include construction management, scheduling, or contractor oversight.

Pursuant to the City's Purchasing Guidelines, the RFP was released on Tuesday, January 20, 2026. Three proposals were received by Thursday, February 19, 2026. A review committee consisting of representatives from Community Development, Public Works Engineering, and Recreation and Parks evaluated the submissions and selected MDG Associates, Inc.

The Community Development Department will oversee the resulting Professional Services Agreement.

DISCUSSION:

A. Scope of Work
The Grants Compliance Manager must have experience in grants administration and compliance, with a strong understanding of federal and state funding requirements. The Manager will oversee grant -related tasks for the project, including but not limited to:
• Financial and Compliance Oversight
o Manage the full grant lifecycle through closeout, including tracking expenditures, ensuring timely use of funds, and preparing reimbursement requests and compliance reports.
• Budget and Contract/Grant Administration
o Apply and interpret requirements across multiple funding sources to ensure consistent compliance.
• Reporting and Documentation
o Verify that expenditures are eligible, properly documented, and reimbursable.
o Maintain organized records and prepare monthly or quarterly progress reports.
• Stakeholder Coordination
o Work with designated City staff to gather required documents. o Provide updates on grant expenditures and compliance status.

B. Deliverables
• Reimbursement and drawdown tracking reports for each funding source • Monthly or quarterly grant status reports
• Final project closeout and completion documentation
Alternatives)
The City Council could decide not to award this Professional Services Agreement and direct staff to conduct all associated efforts in-house. However, this alternative may prevent the City from successfully carrying out Federal and State grant requirements consistent with the various grant deadlines, which could not only prolong the completion of the project, but also risk the funding available for this project.

Fiscal Considerations
No General Fund resources will be used under this Agreement. All fees will be paid solely from eligible federal grant(s) funds, utilizing administrative funding designated for grant management use. The initial contract is for $100,000, with the potential for an increase of a minimum of $25,000 should supplementary tasks be required as noted in the proposed contract.
2 Impact on the Community
Awarding this agreement will enable the City to better meet the needs of the community.

Grant -related guidelines and deadlines have a significant impact on the overall cost and resources required to complete the Sports Complex. The proposed consultant will act as a force multiplier, available to coordinate all grant management and lend expertise regarding a small number of grant sources with which City Staff is not as familiar. This will enrich quality of life for Santa Maria's residents by facilitating the timely delivery of the Sports Complex.

ATTACHMENTS)
A. Resolution — MDG Associates, Inc.

B. Professional Services Agreement — MDG Associates, Inc.

C. Proposal from MDG Associates, Inc.
3 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

AWARDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO MDG
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR GRANTS COMPLIANCE

MANAGEMENT FOR THE SANTA MARIA SPORTS COMPLEX
PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT OF $100,000
WHEREAS, the need exists for the City to obtain grants compliance management services for the multi -funded Sports Complex Project; and WHEREAS, on January 20, 2026, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking qualified firms or individuals to provide Grants Compliance Management Services to assist with various grants that have unique compliance requirements and spending timelines; and
WHEREAS, on February 19, 2026, the City received three proposals from firms that perform this work; and
WHEREAS, a review committee consisting of representatives from Community Development, Public Works Engineering, and Recreation and Parks evaluated the submissions; and
WHEREAS, following deliberations, the selection committee determined that MDG Associates, Inc. satisfied the requirements of the RFP and was deemed a qualified firm to provide the needed Grants Compliance Management Services; and WHEREAS, the firm will provide services on an as -needed basis as defined by the City, and all task orders will have a defined scope, schedule, and fee arrangement that will be negotiated based on the rate schedule included in the agreement; and WHEREAS, the firm will be financially compensated by using eligible federal grant funding that allows for the payment of administrative costs associated with the entire project; and
WHEREAS, additional funding may be provided should the City require supplementary tasks to be accomplished by the firm; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant

Attachment A
effect on the environment. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. A Professional Services Agreement for Grants Compliance Management Services is awarded to MDG Associates, Inc. for a term that ends 12 months after the execution of an executed agreement or once funding is expended, whichever comes first. Depending on the status of the Sports Complex Project and grants associated with it, the term of the agreement may be extended under the authority of the City Manager or his designee should both parties agree; and
SECTION 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute the Professional Services Agreement and any related documents; and SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

Attachment B

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement is made on May 5, 2026 by and between MDG Associates, Inc., a California Corporation ("Contractor") and the City of Santa Maria, a California Municipal Corporation and charter city ("City"), in Santa Maria, California, based on the following recitals:
• Whereas, the City seeks to expedite project delivery, alleviate staff workloads, and coordinate grant administration across a wide range of grant sources through contracting for Grants Compliance Management for the Santa Maria Sports Complex Project (the "Project"); and
■ Whereas, the Contractor has the experience, skills, resources, and the necessary professional licenses and certifications to qualify as Contractor to perform the needed services, and is willing to provide those services on mutually agreeable terms.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:

1. Recitals true. The above recitals are true.

2. General.

2.01. Term and Termination. The term of this contract is one (1) year, beginning on the date first written above. This contract may be extended for up to two (2) periods of one (1) year each by mutual consent of the parties. This contract may be terminated for breach of its terms or conditions, or because of discovery of any act which violates local, state or federal law. Termination is effective 14 days after deposit of notice as specified in this Agreement.

2.02. Services to be Performed. Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of providing the needed services. More specifically, Contractor agrees to perform the specific services listed in Exhibit "A," consistent with the proposal attached in Exhibit "D."

2.03 City's Duties. City's duties under this Agreement are to cooperate with Contractor in the performance of the contract and timely pay invoices.

2.04 Scope of Work. Services to be performed are listed in "Exhibit A."

2.05 Payment. Terms under this Agreement are listed in Exhibit "B."

2.05 Insurance. Contractor shall provide insurance as listed in Exhibit "C."

2.06 Proposal. Proposal included in "Exhibit D."

2.07 Exhibits. Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D" are attached and incorporated.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B

3. Contractor's Obligations.

3.01. Minimum Amount of Service. Contractor should devote sufficient time to perform services under this agreement efficiently and effectively. Contractor may represent, perform services for and be employed by additional individuals or entities, in Contractor's sole discretion, as long as the performance of these extra -contractual services does not interfere with or present a conflict with City's business.

3.02. Timeliness. For services related to the management of the various local, state, and federal grants associated with the Sports Complex Project, each grant has unique compliance requirements and spending timelines. The Contractor will be responsible for grants administration, compliance monitoring, reporting, fiscal oversight, and grant closeout. This role does not include construction management, scheduling, or contractor oversight.

3.03. Tools and Equipment. Except as otherwise stated in this Agreement, Contractor will supply all tools and equipment necessary to perform this Agreement.

3.04. Status. Contractor (including its employees) is an independent contractor. No employer/employee relationship exists between Contractor and the City.

Contractor's assigned personnel shall not be entitled to any benefits payable to employees of the City. The City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings from the compensation payable to Contractor under this agreement.

3.05. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall indemnify, defend (with independent counsel approved by the City) and hold harmless the City, and its directors, officers, and employees from and against all liabilities (including without limitation all claims, losses, damages, penalties, fines, and judgments, associated investigation and administrative expenses, and defense costs including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs and costs of alternative dispute resolution) regardless of nature or type that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, reckless, or willful misconduct of the Contractor or the acts or omissions of an employee, agent or subcontractor of the Contractor. The provisions of this paragraph survive completion of the services or the termination of this contract. The provisions of this Section are not limited by the provisions of the Section relating to insurance.

3.06. Conflict of Interest. Contractor will comply with all conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, the City's Conflict of Interest Code (on file in the City Clerk's Office). All officers, employees and/or agents of Contractor who will be working on behalf of the City pursuant to this Agreement, may be required to file Statements of Economic Interest. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the Contractor to notify that City of any staff changes relating to this Agreement.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
A. In accomplishing the scope of services of this Agreement, all officers, employees and/or agents of Contractor unless as indicated in Subsection B, will be performing a very limited and closely supervised function, and, therefore, unlikely to have a conflict of interest arise. No disclosures are required for any officers, employees, and/or agents of Contractor, except as indicated in Subsection B.

Initials
B. In accomplishing the scope of services of this Agreement, Contractor will be performing a specialized or general service for the City, and there is substantial likelihood that the Contractor's work product will be presented, either written or orally, for the purpose of influencing a governmental decision. As a result, the following Contractor shall be subject to Disclosure Category "1" of the City's Conflict of Interest Code.

Initials

4. Miscellaneous

4.01. Notices. All communication relating to the day-to-day activities of this Agreement shall be exchanged between a designated representative of the City and a representative of Contractor, listed below. All notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change is filed with the City:

To City:

City of Santa Maria
Community Development Department
Attn: Community Programs Division
110 S. Pine Street, Suite 103
Santa Maria, CA 93458
To Contractor:

MDG Associates, Inc.

Attn: David Munoz
10722 Arrow Route, Suite 822
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
If the designated Representative or address of either party changes during the term of this agreement, a written notice shall be given to the other party prior to the effective date of change. Any written notices required under this agreement shall be effective five (5) days after deposit into United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the designated Representative, or upon confirmation of receipt of delivery if another notification process is used.

4.02. Compliance With Laws, etc. Contractor shall comply with all laws including, but not limited to, the rules and policies of the City, in performing this agreement.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B

4.03. Integration. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the parties.

4.04. Interpretation. This agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

4.05. Jurisdiction. Jurisdiction and venue of all disputes over the terms of this agreement shall be in the County of Northern Santa Barbara, State of California.

4.06. Warranty of authority. Each person signing this agreement on behalf of a party warrants that he or she has authority to do so.

4.07. No Waiver. Failure to enforce with respect to a default shall not be construed as a waiver.

4.08. Severability. The provisions of this agreement are severable. If any part of this agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by mutual written consent of the parties.

4.09. Submittals. In addition to any other submittals required by this agreement, Contractor shall submit copies of its current business license and current certificate of workers compensation coverage to the City before beginning work on this project.

4.10 Prevailing Wage. If applicable, Contractor and all subcontractors are required to pay the general prevailing wage rates of per diem wages and overtime and holiday wages determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations under Section 1720 et seq. of the California Labor Code. The Director's determination is on file and open to inspection at www.dir.ca.gov and is referred to and made a part hereof; the wage rates therein ascertained, determined and specified are referred to and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed by the parties on the date first written above.

CONTRACTOR CITY OF SANTA MARIA
By: By: Chenin Dow, Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF WORK
The Grants Compliance Manager must have experience in grants administration and compliance, with a strong understanding of federal and state funding requirements. The Manager will oversee grant -related financial, administrative, and compliance tasks for the project, including but not limited to:

A. Financial and Compliance Oversight
1 Manage the full grant lifecycle through closeout, including tracking expenditures, ensuring timely use of funds, and preparing reimbursement requests in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations.

2. Monitor expenditures to ensure costs are allowable, allocable, reasonable, and properly documented in compliance with all funding requirements.

3. Develop and implement internal controls and compliance procedures to ensure adherence to all applicable regulations and grant agreements.

4. Conduct ongoing compliance monitoring and risk assessments across all funding sources.

5. Ensure proper cash management practices, including alignment of expenditures with reimbursement timing requirements.

6. Prevent duplication of benefits and ensure appropriate allocation of costs across multiple funding sources.

Funding totals approximately $18.5 million from the following sources Funding Source
Funding
Date
Amount
Spending
Deadline
ARPA1
12/31/2024
$2,145,820
12/31/2026
County of Santa Barbara
10/14/2025
$1,500,000
12/31/2026
State of California1
7/1/2023
$1,000,000
6/30/2027
City CDBG (FY 2024-25)2
7/1/2024
$457,906
6/30/2027
City CDBG (FY 2025-26)2
7/1/2025
$933,639
6/30/2028
City CDBG (FY 2026-27)2
7/1/2026
$861,393
6/30/2029
CA Department of Parks &
Recreation
7/1/2020
$6,100,000
6/30/2028
City of Santa Maria (Growth
Mitigation Funds)
10/1/2025
$5,530,000
N/A
'Per Rec & Parks, initially priority funding sources require immediate support. 2 The Community Programs Division of the City of Santa Maria will be managing all CDBG grants/requirements. Minimal tasks will be associated with this funding.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
B. Budget and Contract/Grant Administration

1. Apply and interpret requirements across multiple funding sources, including identifying and reconciling conflicting regulatory provisions.

2. Develop and maintain cost allocation methodologies to ensure proper distribution of shared project costs.

3. Assist with grant amendments, budget modifications, extensions, and scope changes, ensuring proper documentation and approvals.

C. Reporting and Documentation

1. Verify that expenditures are eligible, properly documented, and reimbursable.

2. Maintain organized records and prepare monthly or quarterly progress reports.

3. Prepare and submit monthly or quarterly financial and compliance reports.

4. Track and report on required performance measures and program outcomes.

5. Maintain documentation to support reimbursement requests and drawdowns.

D. Stakeholder Coordination

1. Work with designated City staff to gather required documents.

2. Provide updates on grant expenditures and compliance status.

E. Deliverables

1. Reimbursement and drawdown tracking reports for each funding source.

2. Monthly or quarterly grant status reports.

3. Cost allocation and compliance documentation.

4. Final project closeout and completion documentation.

F. Supplementary Tasks: Monitoring and Compliance Support 3 The Consultant may provide services that include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Subrecipient and Contractor Monitoring
a. Conduct subrecipient risk assessments and develop monitoring plans. b. Review contractor invoices / supporting documentation for compliance. c. Perform desk reviews and/or on -site monitoring, as needed. d. Ensure contractors comply with federal, state, and local grant requirements.

2. Labor Compliance Monitoring
a. Ensure adherence to applicable labor standards, including the Davis - Bacon Act and California Prevailing Wage Law.
b. Perform quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) on City review of certified payroll records and related labor documentation. Should the City request Contractor review of all certified payrolls, additional funding will be negotiated to cover the related costs.
c. Coordinate with City staff to address labor compliance requirements. d. Support preparation of reporting and documentation required for labor compliance reviews, audits, or investigations.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
3 It is noted that these additional tasks may require additional funding to cover the cost of managing these tasks.

EXHIBIT "B"

PAYMENT TERMS
I. Progress Authorization
a. Upon written authorization from the City, the Consultant is authorized to perform work up to a not -to -exceed amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) during the one-year term. Additional funding may be provided for any supplementary tasks identified in Exhibit "A". b. Billing will be based on the hourly rates set forth in Table 1 of the proposal (page 17) as captured below:

Table 1: Rate Schedule - 5 Year Schedule
(Hourly Rates)
Team Member Titl}
2026-27
2027-28
President/Sr. Exec. Vice -President
$175.00
$179.o0
$184.00
$190.00
$196.00
Vice -President
$164.00
$169.00
$173.00
$179.00
$185.00
Senior Director
$163.00
$163.00
$167.00
$172.00
$177.00
Director
$154.00
$158.00
$162.00
$167.00
$172.00
Deputy Director
$139.00
$142.00
$146.00
$151.00
$156.00
Manager
$123.00
$127.00
$130.00
$134.00
$138.00
Deputy Manger
$127.00
$12O.00
$123.00
$127.00
$131.00
Senior Associate
$111.00
$114.00
$117.00
$121.00
$125.00
Associate
$100.00
$103.00
$106.00
$110.00
$114.0o
Senior Analyst
$82.00
$84.00
$86.00
$89.00
$92.00
Analyst
$77.00
$79.00
$81.00
$84.00
$87.00
Secretary
$54.0o
$56.00
$58.00
$60.00
$62.00
c. The administrative and/or delivery cost of the grant(s) used for this project will cover the cost of this professional service agreement. Therefore, proper documentation such as time and attendance records will be provided along with the firm's invoice to effectively account for the cost of these services.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
II. Invoice procedure
a. Payment shall be monthly based on the billable charges. b. The Consultant shall present the bill for charges from the previous month. c. The Consultant's bill shall be substantiated by appropriate documentation, and include an itemized listing of personnel, subcontractors, and other direct costs incurred.
d. City may withhold payment for disputed work. Payment of fees shall not constitute an acceptance of work.

III. Rates shall be billed according to Consultant's attached fee schedule, up to the not -to -exceed amount. Work Authorized by Change Order/Amendment shall be billed at on a time and materials basis according to the attached fee schedule, unless another payment method is agreed to in writing by the City.

IV. If Consultant's response to the City's RFP or RFQ is attached, all terms other than those concerning the Consultant's billing rates are null and void.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
EXHIBIT "C"

INSURANCE
CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the CONTRACTOR, his/her agents, representatives, or employees. If the CONTRACTOR maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the CONTRACTOR.

A. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001), including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury.

2. Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if
CONTRACTOR has no owned autos, covering hired (Code 8)
and non -owned autos (Code 9).

3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance.

4. Errors and Omissions liability insurance appropriate to the CONTRACTOR's profession. Architects' and engineers'
coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability.

B. Minimum Limits of Insurance
CONTRACTOR should maintain limits no less than:

1. General Liability - $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B

2. Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers' Compensation: Statutory limits.

4. Employer's Liability - $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

5. Errors and Omissions Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

C. Self -insured Retentions
Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. The CITY may require the CONTRACTOR to purchase
coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses within the retention.

D. Other Insurance Provisions
The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1 The CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR including materials,
parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form or an endorsement to the CONTRACTOR's insurance
(at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38 and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions are used).

2. For any claims related to this project, the CONTRACTOR's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any
insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the CONTRACTOR's insurance and shall not contribute with it.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B

3. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled or reduced, except with notice stating the title of this contract to the CITY. All notices provided pursuant to this MOU
shall be given to the City representative listed for notice in this Agreement and shall specify the title of this
Agreement. Notice may be given by overnight mail, facsimile with confirmation of receipt, or certified mail with return -receipt requested.

4. CONTRACTOR hereby grants to CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONTRACTOR may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONTRACTOR agrees to obtain any
endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation
endorsement from the insurer.

5. If any of the required policies provide claims -made coverage:
a) The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. b) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after
completion of the contract of work.
c) If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the
CONTRACTOR must purchase "extended reporting"
coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

E. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the CITY.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
F. Verification of Coverage
CONTRACTOR shall furnish the CITY with original certificates and amendatory endorsements of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the CONTRACTOR's obligation to provide them. The CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications at any time.

G. Special Risks or Circumstances
Entity reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Atty. Rev. 2026

Attachment B
"EXHIBIT D"

PROPOSAL
Atty. Rev. 2026

City of Santa Maria
Proposal
Santa Maria Sports Complex
Grants Compliance Manager
February 19, 2026

February 19, 2026
City of Santa Maria
Community Development Department
Attn: Rosie Rojo, Community Programs Manager
110 South Pine Street, Room 103
Santa Maria, CA 93458
Subject: Proposal - Grants Compliance Manager
MDG
Associates, Inc.

Dear Ms. Rojo:

On behalf of MDG Associates, Inc. (MDG), I am pleased to submit our Proposal to provide comprehensive Grants Compliance Management services for the Santa Maria Sports Complex Project. We understand that this multi -funded capital improvement initiative —supported by federal, state, county, and local sources totaling approximately $17.6 million —requires disciplined oversight, fiscal accountability, regulatory compliance, and timely grant closeout.

For more than 35 years, MDG has supported public agencies throughout California in the administration and compliance management of complex, multi -source funding portfolios, including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), State of California grants, County allocations, and locally funded capital projects. Our work routinely involves managing overlapping federal requirements under 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements), HUD regulations, Federal and State prevailing wage statutes, and agency -specific grant conditions.

We understand that the selected Grants Compliance Manager and their support staff will be responsible for:
• Full lifecycle grant administration through closeout
• Tracking expenditures and ensuring timely use of funds • Preparing reimbursement requests and compliance reports • Reviewing and validating procurement records for compliance • Monitoring labor standards, including Davis -Bacon, Section 3, and State prevailing wage requirements
• Coordinating with City staff to maintain organized and audit -ready documentation We further understand, as clarified in Addendum No. 1, that environmental review requirements under CEQA and 24 CFR Part 58 have been completed and that Authority to Use Grant Funds (AUGF) has been received for CDBG components of the project. Accordingly, our focus will be on compliance oversight, fiscal management, procurement validation, and labor standards monitoring.

MDG brings extensive experience supporting public agencies with:
• Multi -source capital project compliance tracking
• Procurement record validation under 2 CFR Part 200 and state requirements • Certified payroll review and labor standards enforcement • Grant reimbursement preparation across multiple reporting platforms • Audit preparation, monitoring response, and successful grant closeout 10722 Arrow Route • Suite 822 • Rancho Cucamonga • California 91730 (909) 476-9696 • Fax (909) 476-6086

The MDG team proposed for this assignment is identified in the proposal, with resumes included in Appendix 1. The engagement will be led by the team of David Munoz, who will serve as MDG's Project Director and Christopher Aune, who will serve as Project Manager. Chris is a Santa Maria Valley resident and brings over two decades of public -sector experience, ensuring responsiveness, accessibility, and strong coordination with City staff.

MDG is prepared to begin services immediately and to establish a structured reimbursement cadence, detailed compliance tracking system, and proactive monitoring framework to ensure all funding sources meet their respective expenditure deadlines.

We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to assisting the City of Santa Maria in successfully administering the Sports Complex grants portfolio.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly:

MDG Associates, Inc.

Rudy E. Munoz, President
10722 Arrow Route, Suite 822
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 476-9696
[email protected]
RespectfyUy-Su1 mitted,
Rudy
President
Enclosure: Proposal
10722 Arrow Route ■ Suite 822 ■ Rancho Cucamonga ■ California 91730 (909) 476-9696 ■ Fax (909) 476-6086

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
A. Introduction 1
B. Qualifications and Firm Experience 3
C. Proposed Methodology 9
D. Key Personnel and Roles 12
E. References 16
F. Fee Proposal 17
Exhibits:

Exhibit "1" - Resumes of Key Personnel

tC

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION
Since 1991, MDG Associates, Inc (MDG) has specialized in crafting tailored solutions to tackle the most pressing challenges faced by our clients. With a distinguished history spanning 35 years, MDG has undergone steady growth by adeptly responding to the evolving needs of the communities we serve to make a tangible difference. Our comprehensive suite of services reflects our dedication to addressing the diverse challenges faced by our clients. These services include grant administration, subrecipient management, implementation of housing and commercial rehabilitation programs, planning, and labor compliance monitoring, among others.

MDG brings a team that possesses a depth of expertise and breadth of experience in providing grants management and compliance services. Our team is comprised of 42 seasoned practitioners. Of those, 23 are subject matter experts in the administration, implementation, and monitoring of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocations, State of California capital improvement grants, and other public infrastructure funding sources. MDG's work routinely involves the application of 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), 24 CFR Part 570, federal labor standards under the Davis -Bacon Act, HUD Section 3 requirements, State of California prevailing wage statutes, and procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Our team regularly reviews procurement files for documentation sufficiency, confirms cost allowability prior to reimbursement submission, and ensures that expenditures are eligible, properly supported, and defensible under audit or monitoring review.

MDG Associates, Inc. is a California corporation and is certified as both a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) and Small Business (SB). The firm has been in continuous operation for 35 years.

Legal Name of Business
State of Incorporation
Point of Contact / Company
Address
Organizational Structure
Time Business in Operation
MDG Associates, Inc.

California
Rudy Munoz, President
10722 Arrow Route, Suite 822
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phone: 909-476-9696
[email protected]
Corporation; Minority Business Enterprise (MBE)
35 years (September 1991)

Santa Maria Sports Complex Project
MDG understands that the Sports Complex Project is supported by multiple funding sources, including federal, state, county, and local funds, each with distinct expenditure deadlines, reporting requirements, and compliance standards. The selected Grants Compliance Manager is expected to oversee the full grant Iifecycle, including expenditure tracking, reimbursement preparation, procurement record validation, labor standards coordination, compliance reporting, and closeout documentation.

MDG's approach to grants compliance is systematic and documentation driven. At the outset of an engagement, the firm establishes a funding source compliance framework that identifies applicable regulatory requirements, reporting obligations, and expenditure deadlines for each funding stream. This framework supports coordinated financial tracking, timely reimbursement submission, and proactive compliance monitoring. The firm also assists jurisdictions in maintaining organized, audit -ready files, preparing monitoring responses, and assembling complete closeout documentation for federal and state funding sources.

The proposed engagement will be led by the team of David Munoz, who will serve as MDG's Project Director and Christopher Aune, who will serve as Project Manager. David and Chris will be assisted by other MDG staff who are knowledgeable in the areas needed to fulfill the tasks outlined in the RFP, such as labor standards compliance monitoring, Section 3 compliance, fiscal management, and file management for compliance with the various grants. Mr. Aune resides in the Santa Maria Valley and brings more than two decades of public -sector experience, ensuring accessibility and familiarity with local governmental processes. Additional compliance and financial staff will be assigned as necessary to meet reporting schedules and funding deadlines.

MDG proposes to function as an extension of City staff by providing structured compliance oversight, reimbursement coordination, procurement validation, labor standards compliance support, and grant closeout preparation. Services will be delivered in coordination with the Community Development and Recreation & Parks Departments to ensure consistent communication, accurate reporting, and adherence to all applicable regulatory requirements.

tC

QUALIFICATIONS AND FIRM EXPERIENCE

QUALIFICATIONS AND FIRM EXPERIENCE
MDG Associates, Inc. (MDG) has more than three decades of experience providing grants administration, fiscal oversight, and regulatory compliance services to public agencies throughout California. The firm's primary practice area is the implementation and oversight of federally and state -funded programs, including capital improvement projects supported by multiple funding sources with distinct compliance and reporting requirements.

The Sports Complex Project requires coordinated management of federal, state, county, and local funding sources with varying expenditure deadlines, documentation standards, and regulatory frameworks. MDG has extensive experience managing similar multi -source funding portfolios and ensuring that expenditures are eligible, properly documented, and defensible under monitoring or audit review.

Experience in Federal and State Grants Administration
Currently, MDG is contracted by 30 cities and three counties to directly oversee their HUD CPD entitlement programs, totaling around $80.5 million annually. In addition, we assist the State of California and the Commonwealths of Puerto Rico in the administration of their CDBG-DR funds totaling more than $6.5 Billion. Our responsibilities encompass the day-to-day administration, implementation, and monitoring of their programs to ensure effective and compliant utilization of their grant funds. This includes the preparation of essential planning documents such as the Five -Year Consolidated Plans, Annual Action Plans, and Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPERs). Furthermore, MDG assists with subrecipient management to ensure adherence with program requirements, monitoring housing programs to verify continued compliance with affordability covenants, and oversight of capital improvement projects to ensure conformance with the Davis -Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA), Section 3 requirements, and the Build America Buy America Act (BABA) preferences.

In recent years, MDG has assisted over 15 jurisdictions to administer and implement their CDBG- CV, HOME -ARP, and ESG-CV programs, resulting in an approximate investment of $50 million in projects that have positively transformed and revitalized their communities. Furthermore, MDG has played an instrumental role in supporting the State of California and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in establishing systems and developing policies and procedures to effectively manage and monitor their CDBG-DR and CDBG-MIT grants, collectively amounting to around $21 billion, allocated to disaster response and recovery efforts.

Due to the successful track record of these endeavors, MDG has been entrusted with developing resources, providing technical assistance, and conducting training nationwide on behalf of HUD.

Specifically, our team has conducted training sessions on various subject matter areas such as "Basically CDBG," Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR), CPD Maps, eCon Planning Suite, and the Integrated Disbursement Information System (IDIS). Furthermore, our staff currently assist grantees across the country through the HUD Exchange Ask -a -Question (AAQ) portal on matters pertaining to CDBG, HOME, DRGR, and BABA.

In addition, MDG staff provides administrative and compliance oversight for State of California grant funds including CaIHOME, and Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program (PLHA) grant funds as well as assisting the Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency (LACAHSA) in the oversight of the County Measure A funds.

Our responsibilities include overall grant management including financial tracking, reimbursement preparation, performance reporting, procurement documentation review, subrecipient monitoring, labor standards compliance monitoring, and grant closeout preparation. We assist jurisdictions in applying the Uniform Administrative Requirements under 2 CFR Part 200, including procurement standards, cost allowability analysis, financial management systems, and audit preparation. MDG regularly supports jurisdictions during HUD and HCD monitoring reviews as well and the jurisdiction's Single Audits and prepares corrective action responses where necessary.

In addition to day-to-day administration, MDG staff have been selected by HUD Headquarters to provide national -level training and technical assistance to grantees on regulatory compliance, including instruction on the IDIS and DRGR reporting systems, fiscal management, federal procurement requirements, labor standards monitoring, and Uniform Guidance implementation.

Two members of our staff have trained hundreds of CDBG grant recipients in the "Basically CDBG" training which can also be viewed on HUD's website (HUD Exchange). Members of our team also support HUD's Ask A Question (AAQ) portal, providing regulatory interpretation and compliance guidance to grantees nationwide.

Experience Managing Multi -Source Capital Projects
MDG has substantial experience overseeing public facility and infrastructure projects funded through combinations of federal, state, county, and local sources. These projects often involve overlapping regulatory requirements, including federal labor standards under the Davis -Bacon Act, State of California prevailing wage laws, HUD Section 3 requirements, and procurement compliance under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327.

Our approach to multi -source capital project oversight includes the development of a funding source compliance matrix to identify applicable regulatory requirements, expenditure deadlines, and reporting obligations for each funding stream. This matrix forms the basis for structured financial tracking and reimbursement coordination. Where procurement has already occurred, as is the case with the Sports Complex Project, MDG conducts file validation to ensure compliance with applicable federal and state standards and identifies any documentation gaps requiring corrective action.

With respect to labor standards compliance, MDG has extensive experience reviewing certified payroll records, coordinating worker interview documentation, and ensuring that federal and state labor requirements are applied appropriately based on funding source. We utilize the LCP Tracker web based reporting system to assist in tracking and ensuring contractor compliance with applicable Federal and State labor standard requirements. We regularly work with jurisdictions to maintain organized and defensible labor compliance files in preparation for monitoring reviews.

Our experience managing capital improvement funding portfolios include senior centers, community centers, community parks including soccer and baseball complexes, police stations, and other city facilities such as streets, storm drain systems, and city yard facilities. We believe that this experience positions MDG to effectively oversee the Sports Complex grants Iifecycle through final closeout.

Financial Management and Reporting Systems
MDG staff are experienced in multiple federal and state reporting platforms and financial management systems. Our team works regularly with IDIS, DRGR, PAGE, RAMPS, and other federal reporting databases. While the Community Programs Division will continue handling IDIS for CDBG components of the Sports Complex Project, MDG is prepared to coordinate reimbursement preparation and reporting across other applicable funding systems to ensure consistency and accuracy.

Our financial oversight services include expenditure reconciliation against approved budgets, cost allowability review under 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E, preparation of reimbursement documentation, and maintenance of audit -ready financial records. We assist jurisdictions in establishing reimbursement cadences, typically on a monthly basis, to ensure timely drawdown and minimize risk of unspent funds approaching statutory deadlines.

MDG maintains a staff of experienced grants administrators, compliance specialists, financial analysts, and regulatory advisors. Many members of our team have provided federal technical assistance and national training on behalf of HUD and the California Department of Housing and Community Development. Our staff possess advanced knowledge of Microsoft Office applications and project tracking tools and are experienced in maintaining structured documentation systems that support monitoring readiness and grant closeout.

The firm's long-standing relationships with federal and state oversight agencies reflect our reputation for technical competence, regulatory knowledge, and consistent compliance performance.

Labor Compliance
MDG is currently under contract to provide labor compliance services to 13 cities in Southern California. Our typical scope of work includes preparation or review of bid documents for compliance with Federal labor standards and requirements including but not limited to Davis - Bacon and Related Acts, Section 3, and DOL regulations; attending pre -bid and pre -construction meetings to present information on Davis -Bacon and Section 3 requirements; reviewing submitted bid documents for compliance; comprehensively analyzing 100% of all certified payroll reports for compliance, establish and maintain contractor and subcontractor labor files; conduct employee field interviews and document posting compliance; reconcile weekly certified payroll reports and supporting documentation; monitor contractors for Section 3 accomplishments; schedule labor compliance file reviews prior to release of retention funds; and address and resolve any underpayment or deficiency issues.

Our team utilizes industry -standard tools including using LCPtracker " to deliver exceptional value to our clients and their construction contractors. These tools 1) help participating contractors produce accurate and compliant certified payroll reports electronically in one central place, 2) reduce reporting lag time, 3) reduce errors and violations, 4) provide greater success in the event of any compliance audit or investigation.

Public Agencies Provided Services in Last 5 Years with Most Recent within Last 2 Years.

U
a a

O U
U Q
R
a
(3 u! .
m2 t
D O O)
O= 2
(7 MI
m2
D O
O 2
E
o
o D
cis
N d
I cc
E Q
o
- Q
co
N d
2 cc
a
w
cc
Q Q
O H
m rn
"' EE
cc O O
co y 0
D
a N 2
E
,_ L 4
w j (7
vL) 0 D
D cc V
a y
E
_ m
to p Q
Z a t-
1 Services Provided in Last 2 Years
Apple Valley, CA
X
X
X
X
X
Agoura Hills, CA
X
X
X
Azusa, CA
X
X
Baldwin Park, CA
X
X
Carson, CA
X
X
X
Chula Vista, CA
X
X
Clarksville, TN
X
X
X
X
Commerce, CA
X
X
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
X*
X
X
Corona, CA
X
X
X
X
X
County of Allegheny, PA
X
County of Henrico, VA
X*
X*
County of Imperial, CA
X
County of Los Angeles, CA
X
X
County of Orange, CA
X
County of San Bernardino, CA
X
X
County of Santa Barbara, CA
X
X
X
County of Ventura, CA
X
Dallas, TX
X
X
Downey, CA
X
X
X
X
X
Duarte, CA
X
X
Fontana, CA
X
X
X
X
X
Fresno, CA
X
X
Gardena, CA
X
X
X
X
X
Goleta, CA
X
X
Hawthorne, CA
X
X
X
X
X
Hesperia, CA
X
X
X
X
X
X
Irvine, CA
X
X
X
X
X
X
King County, WA
X
La Canada Flintridge, CA
X
X
X
La Habra, CA
X
X
X
X
Los Angeles, CA
X
X
Miami — Dade County
X
New York City
X
Palmdale, CA
X
X
X
X
X
X
Paramount, CA
X
X
X
X
X
X
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
X
X
X
X
X
San Dimas, CA
X
X
San Juan, PR
X*
X*
Santa Ana, CA
X
X
X
X
Seattle, WA
X*
X*
State of California
X
X
X
State of Iowa
X*
X*
X*
State of New Mexico
X
X
State of North Dakota
X*
X*
Temecula, CA
X
X
X
X
X
Tucson, AZ
X*
X*
Upland, CA
X
X
X
X
X
X
Walnut, CA
X
X
X

U
a s
O U
UQ
0 u! '

DO D)
of
a
(. W
DO
ox
o
U O
cri .c
N o
2cc
o�
0 0
y a)
_cc
a
w
<<
UH
a
c
14 M=
g E
p a) o
acn2
, tD
a o m
ai y o
voce
0 D ()
= E
2 O
2tlla-
Services Provided in Last 5 Years
X
X
Albuquerque, NM
X
Arecibo, PR
X*
X*
County of Harris, TX
X
Detroit, MI
X*
X*
Houston, TX
X
Kansas City, KS
X*
County of Riverside, CA
X
Simi Valley, CA
X*
X*
X*
State of Utah
X*
X*
Tulsa, OK
X*
X*
*Conducted on behalf of HUD

tC

PROPOSED METHODOLOGY

PROPOSED METHODOLOGY
MDG Associates, Inc. proposes a structured, coordinated, and compliance -driven approach to administering the grant funding portfolio for the Santa Maria Sports Complex Project. The firm's role is to ensure that all applicable federal, state, county, and local funding requirements are satisfied; that expenditures are properly documented and reimbursed; and that the City maintains organized, audit -ready records through final grant closeout.

David Munoz and Chris Aune will oversee grants management for the project. Mr. Munoz has over twelve years' experience in grant administration and training across various funding sources, while Mr. Aune offers more than twenty years of public -sector experience and is locally based in Santa Maria Valley, facilitating coordination with Community Development and Recreation & Parks staff. Other MDG team members provide specialized expertise in areas like labor standards and grant reporting. Rudy Munoz will support David and Chris as needed, and Juan Nunez will handle Davis -Bacon and Section 3 compliance.

MDG's coordination model is organized around three primary management components:
schedule management, budget management, and grants compliance management Managing Schedule
The Sports Complex Project involves multiple funding sources with distinct expenditure deadlines extending through 2026-2028. MDG will implement a funding compliance calendar at the outset of the engagement identifying all statutory deadlines, reporting cycles, reimbursement timing, and closeout milestones associated with each funding source.

This schedule management system will include regular coordination meetings with City staff to review progress toward expenditure targets and identify any potential risks to timely drawdown.

MDG will establish a recommended quarterly reimbursement cadence to ensure consistent fund utilization and to minimize the risk of delayed expenditures approaching statutory deadlines.

Where corrective action is necessary to maintain compliance with funding timelines, MDG will provide written recommendations and assist staff in implementing appropriate adjustments.

Mr. Aune's local availability allows for timely in -person coordination meetings when necessary, ensuring that schedule -related issues are addressed proactively and efficiently.

Managing Budget
MDG will implement structured financial tracking procedures to ensure that all project expenditures are eligible, properly allocated to the appropriate funding source, and supported by sufficient documentation. Our services will include reconciliation of expenditures against approved grant budgets, verification of cost allowability under applicable regulatory frameworks, and preparation of reimbursement documentation for submission through applicable reporting systems.

Where procurement has already been completed, MDG will conduct a review of procurement files to confirm compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR Part 200 and applicable state requirements. This review will ensure that expenditures charged to federal or state funding sources are supported by documentation sufficient to withstand audit or monitoring review.

MDG will coordinate with City financial staff to ensure that drawdown documentation is consistent with internal accounting records and that reimbursement submissions are accurate and complete. Regular financial status updates will be provided to City staff summarizing expenditures to date, remaining balances, and projected drawdown schedules.

Managing Grants Compliance
MDG's primary responsibility under this engagement is regulatory compliance oversight. The firm will ensure that all grant -funded activities are administered in accordance with applicable federal, state, county, and local requirements. This includes application of Uniform Administrative Requirements under 2 CFR Part 200, CDBG regulations under 24 CFR Part 570, labor standards compliance under the Davis -Bacon Act where applicable, State of California prevailing wage laws, and HUD Section 3 requirements.

In coordination with the Community Programs Division, MDG will support labor standards documentation review, including certified payroll verification and maintenance of organized compliance files. Although IDIS entries for CDBG components will continue to be handled by City staff, MDG will coordinate reimbursement preparation and documentation for other funding sources to ensure consistency across reporting platforms.

The firm will maintain organized grant files structured to support monitoring reviews and final closeout. Prior to grant expiration, MDG will prepare a closeout checklist for each funding source and confirm that required reports, reconciliations, and compliance documentation have been completed.

Coordination with City Staff and Departments
MDG recognizes that effective grants compliance requires coordination among Community Development, Recreation & Parks, Finance, and other departments involved in project implementation. Mr. Aune will serve as the central coordination point between MDG and City staff, ensuring that information requests are addressed promptly and that documentation is maintained in a consistent and organized format.

MDG will participate in regularly scheduled status meetings and provide written summaries of compliance activities as needed. The firm will also remain available for consultation regarding regulatory interpretation or compliance questions that arise during project implementation.

Quality Control and Documentation Standards
All work performed under this engagement will be subject to internal quality control review.

Compliance documentation, reimbursement requests, and financial tracking reports will be reviewed prior to submission to ensure accuracy and completeness. MDG's documentation

practices are structured to meet federal audit standards and to facilitate efficient monitoring responses if requested by funding agencies.

Summary of Methodology
MDG's proposed coordination approach reflects substantial experience managing complex, multi -source funding portfolios and demonstrates familiarity with the regulatory frameworks governing federal and state grants. The firm's methodology emphasizes proactive schedule management, disciplined budget oversight, and structured compliance monitoring to safeguard public funds and ensure successful grant completion.

With David Munoz providing compliance oversight and Christopher Aune serving as local Project Manager, MDG offers both regional presence and technical expertise. Our organized management framework, regulatory knowledge, and documented experience with grants administration and compliance directly align with the City's evaluation criteria, including experience, familiarity with funding requirements, and the strength of the proposed project management approach. We are confident that MDG's structured coordination model will provide the City of Santa Maria with reliable, compliant, and professional grants management services throughout the lifecycle of the Sports Complex Project.

KEY PERSONNEL AND ROLES

KEY PERSONNEL AND ROLES
Proposed Team
The members of the MDG team proposed to directly provide Grants Compliance Management, Davis Bacon, and Section 3 consulting services are provided below, in addition to their role in the implementation of the scope of work. Additional support team members will be available to assist on as needed basis. Resumes for each staff member are provided under Exhibit "1" of this proposal.

The following section provides biographical information for each of the MDG staff members included on the Project Team.

Rudy Munoz, President - MDG Associates Inc.

Rudy Munoz is the founder and President of MDG Associates, Inc. With more than 40 years of overall experience in the community development field, Rudy's primary focus is on assisting government agencies with all aspects of the administration and implementation of their HUD -funded CPD Programs. These include, but are not limited to, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR), and Housing Rehabilitation programs.

Rudy works hand -in -hand with HUD grantees on the development of implementation strategies and tools to facilitate the management of their CPD programs, providing training for the HUD CPD Programs, and at times implementing the day-to-day functions of the programs. These functions include all phases of program implementation from the development of Consolidated Plans and Action Plans through the programmatic and financial closeout of the projects and grants. He assists grantees in developing HUD mandated Policies and Procedures for administering all CPD Programs and implementing Housing Rehabilitation, Commercial Rehabilitation, and Homebuyer activities funded under these programs.

Rudy is a Certified HOME Specialist and is a subcontractor to national Technical Assistance (TA) providers through HUD's OneCPD and Community Compass initiatives. Through the initiatives, he provides TA and training to HUD grantees throughout the U.S. in CDBG, HOME, and CDBG-Disaster Recovery Programs. He provides training at the national level in "Basically CDBG," Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), Integrated Disbursement and Information Systems (IDIS), and the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR). Because of his fluency in Spanish, he has prepared and provided many of the trainings referenced above in Spanish for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its municipalities.

Rudy has a Bachelor of Architecture (5 yr. degree) from California Polytechnic University in Pomona.

David Munoz, Director - MDG Associates Inc.

With more than 12 years of experience in the planning and implementation of federal grants including those offered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Office of Community Planning and Development, David assists municipalities with all aspects of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) management.

David focuses on strategic community investment in affordable housing, development of infrastructure and coordinating the supportive services necessary to achieve local goals and to affirmatively further fair housing choice. His work in these areas includes over 30 Consolidated Plans, 100 Annual Action Plans, and numerous program policy and procedure documents to facilitate the implementation of the housing and community development projects resulting from these plans.

David is a national Technical Assistance (TA) provider through HUD's Community Compass initiatives. Through the initiative, he provides training to municipalities in the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system and is also a beta tester for HUD on the system. Because of his fluency in Spanish, he provides training in Spanish for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

David has a Bachelor of Politics and International Affairs with a Minor in Latin American Studies (Honors Program) from Wake Forest University.

Christopher Aune, Manager - MDG Associates Inc.

Chris Aune is a seasoned planning, housing, and grants management professional with over 22 years of experience in urban development, zoning, permitting, affordable housing initiatives, and public - sector grant administration. His expertise includes the administration and compliance of HUD and State housing funds, development of architectural and design guidelines, management of complex affordable housing initiatives, and strategic use of permit -ready ADU programs to expand housing access and streamline approvals.

Chris has successfully worked on high -impact projects such as the redevelopment of the former Antelope Valley Fairgrounds, citywide scattered -site housing developments, Transit Oriented Development (T.O.D.) Zone guidelines, and the oversight of housing rehabilitation and homeownership programs funded through federal and state grants. His guidance on architectural design standards, stakeholder engagement, fiscal compliance, and coordination with engineering, building, and finance departments has helped cities achieve policy objectives while maintaining regulatory compliance and measurable results.

Chris has a Bachelor of Arts in Planning and Urban Studies from California State University Northridge, Northridge, CA.

Juan Nunez, Associate - MDG Associates Inc.

Juan leads the company's labor compliance and Section 3 monitoring program. The labor compliance monitoring has included both State of California as well as the federal Davis -Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA). Juan is responsible for labor compliance monitoring for over fifteen cities and over 30 projects. Juan focuses on implementing monitoring strategies to assist cities and contractors through the various labor compliance regulations imposed by federal and state grants. Juan is responsible for ensuring that all contractors and subcontractors are well informed of the reporting requirements during the pre -bid and pre -construction meetings. He is responsible for collecting, reviewing, and working with contractors on ensuring that all workers are paid prevailing wages as established by the regulatory agencies.

The Project Team was selected based on the requirements and tasks specified in the Request for Proposals (RFP). This team is comprised of professionals with subject matter expertise and practitioners with experience in all facets of grants management and labor compliance services. Additional staff will be available to support the deliverables outlined in the RFP as necessary.

Rudy Munoz I President I Contract Administrator
Rudy Munoz will serve as the Contract Administrator on behalf of MDG. He will provide senior -level guidance on complex compliance issues, federal and state regulatory interpretation, and risk mitigation strategies, while supporting the assigned project team on an as needed basis. Mr. Munoz will also serve as the back-up Project Director if the Project Director is unavailable.

David Munoz I Director - Grants Management I Project Director David Munoz will serve as the Project Director for this assignment providing oversight of grants administration, regulatory compliance, and fiscal management activities. He will ensure that the project remains aligned with applicable federal, state, county, and local funding requirements and that schedule, budget and reporting obligations are managed.

He will oversee provide technical direction to the team to maintain documentation integrity and audit readiness throughout the lifecycle of the assignment.

Christopher Aune I Manager - Planning/Grants Management I Project Manager Chris Aune will serve as the primary day-to-day Grants Compliance Manager for the Santa Maria Sports Complex Project. He will oversee expenditure tracking, reimbursement coordination, procurement documentation review, and overall compliance with applicable funding requirements. Chris will coordinate MDG staff responsible for Davis -Bacon and Section 3 monitoring. Chris will provide local presence and accessibility, ensuring that all activities are administered in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations.

Juan Nunez I Associate - Labor Compliance I Labor Compliance Specialist Juan Nunez will serve as the labor compliance and Section 3 specialist and work closely with contractors to ensure certified payroll submissions are timely and accurate within LCPtracker— and compliant with applicable Davis -Bacon and State prevailing wage requirements. He will attend pre -bid and pre -construction meetings as requested, will ensure on -site HUD -11 Employee Interviews are conducted, verify required jobsite postings, and coordinate with project staff to maintain organized labor compliance files. 015

REFERENCES
The following list represents MDG client references for the performance of similar tasks and grants management. Additional references are available upon request.

CLIENT

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

DURATION
City of Irvine
Sarah Escobedo, Management
Analyst II
1 Civic Center Plaza,
Irvine, CA 92606
E-mail:[email protected]
Phone: (949) 724-7447
City of Fontana
Valerie Gonzales, Housing Dev. MGR.
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (909) 350-6625
City of Hawthorne
Kimberly Mack, Director of Housing
4455 West 126th Street
Hawthorne, CA 90250
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 349-1603
State of California - Housing and
Community Development Dept.

Alice Brodkin, Disaster Recovery
Federal Fiscal Compliance Section
Manager
651 Bannon Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 883-6139
Administered the CDBG, HOME, and ESG
Programs; Administered the CDBG funded
Housing Rehabilitation and Mobilehome
Rehabilitation Programs; Administered the
CDBG-CV, HOME -ARP, and ESG-CV Programs;
Annual Plans and CAPERs.

Prepared Five -Year Consolidated Plan for 2010-
2014; 2015-2019; 2020-2024; 2025-2029
Implemented the CDBG, HOME, and ESG
Programs; Implemented the CDBG funded
Housing Rehabilitation and Lead Hazard
Reduction Programs; Implemented the CalHome
Mobile Home Rehabilitation Program; Annual
Plans and CAPERs.

Prepared Five -Year Consolidated Plan for 2010-
2014; 2015-2019; 2020-2024; 2025-2029
Administered the CDBG & HOME Program;
Administered / implemented the CDBG funded
Housing Rehabilitation Program; Administered /
Implemented the Commercial Rehabilitation
Program; Administered the CDBG-CV, HOME -
ARP, and ESG-CV Programs; Implemented the
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP);
Annual Plans and CAPERs.

Prepared Five -Year Consolidated Plan for 2005-
2010; 2010-2014; 2015-2019; 2020-2024; 2025-
2029
Supported the State in implementing the CDBG-
DR funded Multi -Family Development Program
and assisted the Fiscal Compliance Division with
fiscal management tasks, including
reconciliations, processing draws, and delivering
training and technical assistance to
subrecipients across the state for all Disaster
Recovery grants awarded to the State.
2001
To
Present
2010
to
Present
1996
to
Present
2018
to
Present

tC

FEE PROPOSAL

FEE PROPOSAL
MDG Associates, Inc. proposes to provide the Grants Compliance Manager services to the City of Santa Maria on a time and materials basis. Billing will be based on the hourly rates set forth in Table 1: Rate Schedule included below. This approach allows for flexibility in responding to the City's specific needs and ensures that costs are directly aligned with the services provided.

If the City requests MDG to handle all daily labor compliance services, we are willing to offer fixed lump sum fee proposals for these services. Please note that MDG uses the LCPTracker software system to carry out its labor compliance monitoring.

We are committed to delivering high -quality work in a cost-effective manner and will coordinate closely with City staff to manage project budgets and reporting expectations.

Table 1: Rate Schedule - 5 Year Schedule
(Hourly Rates)
Team Member Titl =
025-26
PY
2026- ,
PY
;:q 7-28
Itto
President/Sr. Exec. Vice -President
$175.00
$179.00
$184.00
$190.00
$196.00
Vice -President
$164.00
$169.00
$173.00
$179.00
$185.00
Senior Director
$163.00
$163.00
$167.00
$172.00
$177.00
Director
$154.00
$158.00
$162.00
$167.00
$172.00
Deputy Director
$139.00
$142.00
$146.00
$151.00
$156.00
Manager
$123.00
$127.00
$130.00
$134.00
$138.00
Deputy Manger
$127.00
$120.00
$123.00
$127.00
$131.00
Senior Associate
$111.00
$114.00
$117.00
$121.00
$125.00
Associate
$100.00
$103.00
$106.00
$110.00
$114.00
Senior Analyst
$82.00
$84.00
$86.00
$89.00
$92.00
Analyst
$77.00
$79.00
$81.00
$84.00
$87.00
Secretary
$54.00
$56.00
$58.00
$60.00
$62.00
**Program year is defined as July 1 to June 30 of the following year.

Personnel Resumes

RUDY MUNOZ
President

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Grants Management
HUD CPD Programs
Disaster Recovery Programs
CARES Act
Disaster Recovery Grant
Reporting (DRGR) System
Uniform Administrative
Requirements -2 CFR Part 200

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
40 Years

CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING
Certified HOME Program
Regulations
California General Contractor
No. 681042
ICBO Earthquake Retrofit -
Wood Frame Certification
Certified Lead Visual Inspector

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture
California Polytechnic
University - Pomona

WORK HISTORY
MDG Associates, Inc.
1991 - Present
City of Huntington Park
1988 - 1991
MDG
A--sooiaLes. Inc.

Rudy Munoz serves as President and founder of MDG Associates, Inc. Over the past 40 years, he has assisted cities and counties with the design, administration, and implementation of their HUD -funded CPD Programs, including, but not limited to the CDBG, HOME, NSP and CDBG-DR programs. Rudy works with government agencies on the development of implementation strategies and tools that facilitate the management of their programs. He has been involved in HUD Disaster Recovery Programs since the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, where he directed the rehabilitation of over 300 homes for two cities in Los Angeles County. Rudy works as a subcontractor to several national Technical Assistance (TA) providers through HUD's Community Compass initiatives. He has provided classroom training on behalf of HUD including Basically CDBG, Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), CPD Maps, eCon Planning Suite, and the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. Due to his Spanish fluency, he has also provided all of the training in Spanish for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its municipalities.

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
State of California - Disaster Recovery and Mitigation Grant Financial Management, Data, and Reporting
Subject Matter Expert - Team Co -lead November 2019 - June 2022 Rudy is the working group co -lead for the implementation of the financial management, data, and reporting (FDR) unit for Disaster Recovery and Mitigation grants received by the State of California from 2017 through the present. In total, he is working with seven disaster recovery and mitigation grants totaling approximately $2.5 billion. Building on the basic framework of the CDBG program regulations, CDBG-DR Federal Register Notices, and the 2 CFR Part 200 regulations, Rudy has led the preparation of financial management policies and procedures, the development of standard operating procedures (SOPs), workflows, forms and documents, checklists, and system tools to assist HCD-DR staff in the fiscal management aspects of the disaster recovery and mitigation grants. He is assisting in conducting regularly scheduled reconciliations of their labor costs as well as the reconciliation across the three different program level systems (DRGR, Fi$Cal, and Grants Network) and one project level system (eGrants). Rudy also provides technical assistance and training to new staff assigned to the disaster recovery program and regularly provides training for subrecipients in matters related to financial management.

Programs: CDBG-DR CDBG-MIT 2 CFR Part 200
Client: Alice Broadkin, Section Chief -Fiscal Compliance & Monitoring, California HCD 2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95833 [email protected] (916) 841-8996

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
Rehabilitation Programs (multiple agencies)
Program Manager / President ! 1985 - Current
Rudy has provided residential and commercial rehabilitation program administration services to the City of Upland in addition to approximately 40 other grantees / participating jurisdictions in the last 30 years. Rudy's services to Upland have supported improvements to residential and commercial structures in the low- and moderate -income sections of the community. Rudy has designed and implemented housing rehabilitation programs utilizing a variety of grants including, but not limited to, CDBG, HOME, state, and local redevelopment funds that resulted in the rehabilitation of over 1,000 residential dwellings. In addition, he has designed and implemented commercial rehabilitation programs utilizing CDBG and local funds that has resulted in the renovation of over 200 commercial buildings in commercial districts that serve the low- and moderate -income community. In this role, Rudy has developed program guidelines, policies and procedures, implementation forms and documents, and tracking and monitoring systems for these programs. Rudy is currently overseeing MDG program staff implementing these programs in cities across Southern California.

Programs: CDBG i HOME I Housing Rehabilitation Commercial Rehabilitation Client: Diane Cotto, Development Services Manager, City of Upland 460 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland, CA 91786
[email protected] (909) 931-4146
City of Paramount (plus various other cities), HUD CPD Programs Administration/Housing & Commercial Rehabilitation Administration
Program Manager / President 2001 - Current
Rudy has provided program administration services to the City of Paramount in addition to 30 other grantees / participating jurisdictions during the last 20 years. Rudy's services to Paramount have supported improvements to a number of community facilities and infrastructure projects in the low- and moderate -income sections of the community. Rudy has designed and implemented a housing rehabilitation program utilizing HOME program funds that resulted in the rehabilitation of over 350 homes.

In addition, he has designed and implemented a commercial rehabilitation program utilizing CDBG funds that has resulted in the renovation of over 60 commercial buildings in the City's core commercial district that serves the low- and moderate -income community. In this role, Rudy has developed program guidelines, supporting forms and documents, and tracking and monitoring systems for all of these programs to ensure compliance with CDBG and HOME regulations. Rudy is currently overseeing MDG program staff implementing these programs in cities across Southern California.

Programs: CDBG HOME ! Housing Rehabilitation Commercial Rehabilitation Client: John King, Planning Director, City of Paramount 16400 Colorado Avenue, Paramount, CA 90723
[email protected] (562) 220-2049

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
U.S. HUD Technical Assistance - Basically CDBG Training and Online e -Learning Curriculum Subject Matter Expert /Co -Lead Trainer 2010 - 2021
Rudy was a co -trainer under contract to Enterprise Advisors and ICF for HUD's live in -person Basically CDBG Trainings from 2010 to 2017, which culminated in a recorded session in Atlanta, GA that was subsequently edited and used as part of HUD's Basically CDBG Online e -learning curriculum that is available to the public on the HUDExchange.info website. Rudy also worked with Enterprise and HUD Headquarters staff to produce the Basically CDBG Online e -learning curriculum that is currently posted to the HUDExchange.info website (2019-2020). Specifically, Rudy assisted in writing the content for the topical capacity building modules, made recommendations for edits to the live video recordings and reviewed all content for consistency with current HUD policy and guidance. Rudy assisted in the translation of the Basically CDBG training slide deck and manual into Spanish and provided the training in Spanish for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Programs: CDBG Federal Crosscutting
Client: Diane Lobasso, Senior Advisor, HUD Office of DAS for Grants Programs 451 7th St. SW, Washington, D.C., 20410
[email protected] (202) 402-2191
HUD CPD Program Trainings/Technical Assistance
Subject Matter Expert / Trainer 2010 - Current
Rudy has provided a number of live in -person trainings on behalf of HUD through multiple service providers such as TDA, Enterprise Advisors, Cloudburst Group, ICF and NALCAB. Rudy has provided in -class training and technical assistance for grantees in two of HUDs reporting systems: the Integrated Disbursement and Information Systems (IDIS), and the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR). He has assisted HUD Headquarters as a beta tester for the updates to the DRGR system as well as being a drafter/reviewer on the Ask A Question (AAQ) pool. Rudy was also selected as a trainer for the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) Final Rule and has also trained Financial Management Systems (2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements), eCon Planning Suite (for the development of Consolidated Plans and Action Plans); and CPD Maps. Rudy has provided all of the aforementioned training in English and in Spanish for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. In 2020, Rudy presented the CDBG-CV National Objectives training.

Programs: CDBG I Federal Crosscutting AFH IDIS eCon Planning Suite Client: HUD Office for Grants Programs
451 7th St. SW, Washington, D.C., 20410
[email protected] (202) 402-2191

DAVID MUNOZ
Director

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Grants Management
HUD CPD Programs
Disaster Recovery Programs
CARES Act
Disaster Recovery Grant
Reporting (DRGR) System

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
12 Years

EDUCATION
B.A. Politics and International
Affairs
Wake Forest University

WORK HISTORY
MDG Associates, Inc.
2014 - Present
Congressional Hispanic
Leadership Institute - Global
Leaders Fellow
2018
Winston-Salem Poverty
Thought Force
2016 - 2017
Fundacion Chile 21 -
Research Assistant Intern
2015
MDG Associates Inc.
2014 - 2018 (part time)
MDG
A--sooiaLes. Inc.

David has assisted cities, counties and states with the design, administration, implementation, and oversight of housing and community development programs - primarily through HUD CPD Programs. Provided services include the oversight of subrecipients, contractors, and internal departments to ensure regulatory compliance in their program implementation. He also provided CDBG-DR technical assistance to grantees, is a HUD national Technical Assistance provider and trainer on behalf of the DRGR system, is part of the HUD Ask a Question DRGR response team and conducted DRGR training in Spanish for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Areas of specialization include review of client's programmatic and financial systems, preparation of policies and procedures, development of implementation tools, forms, and mechanisms to assist the grantee in documenting process and compliance in addition to establishing performance and financial monitoring systems.

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
State of California - CDBG-CV and ESG-CV Technical Assistance Subject Matter Expert - Training Team Lead March 2021 - Current David developed training and capacity building materials for units of local government (UGLGs) and subrecipients under the State of California's $150 Million Community Development Block Grant - CV (CDBG-CV) and $315 Million Emergency Solutions Grant - CV (ESG-CV) programs funded by HUD in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Training and capacity building was provided on the rules, regulations, and requirements of the CDBG-CV and the ESG-CV programs to State staff as well as subrecipients, and contractors receiving CDBG-CV and ESG-CV funds. He supported the State in designing tools, templates, and resource guides to support implementation of the CDBG-CV and ESG-CV programs; and provided technical assistance and performed QA/QC of program resources.

Programs: CDBG Admin. HOME Admin. Housing Rehab Admin. CDBG-CV ESG-CV
Client: Felicity Gasser, Section Chief
California Department of Housing and Community Development 2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95833 [email protected] (916) 820-1187
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) Technical Assistance
Subject Matter Expert - Trainer & TA Provider May 2018 - Current David was a co -trainer under contract to TDA Inc. for HUD's in -person Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system trainings including training in Spanish for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. In addition, he provided on-line training on the DRGR system to grantees across the country participating remotely. He is a drafter/reviewer on the Ask A Question (AAQ) portal for the DRGR system. In addition, he assisted in the development of the DRGR User Manual reflecting the updates performed to the reporting system through release 8.0.

Programs: DRGR Reporting System
Client: Steven D. Edwards, CPD Specialist, HUD
451 7th Street SW, Washington, D.C., 20410
[email protected] (803) 765-5292

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
City of Hawthorne (plus various other cities), HUD CPD Programs Administration/ Housing & Commercial Rehab Administration
Program Manager - Manager June 2018 - Current
David has provided program administration services to the City of Hawthorne in addition to multiple other grantees / participating jurisdictions. His services to Hawthorne have supported the improvements to a number of community facilities and infrastructure projects in the low- and moderate -income sections of the community. He has assisted in the implementation of a housing rehabilitation program utilizing HOME program funds that resulted in the rehabilitation of over 60 homes. In addition, he has designed and assisted in the implementation of a commercial rehabilitation program in the City's core commercial district that serves the low- and moderate -income community. In this role, he has developed program guidelines, supporting forms and documents, and tracking and monitoring systems for all programs to ensure compliance with CDBG and HOME regulations. David is also currently overseeing MDG program staff implementing these programs in cities across Southern California.

Programs: CDBG HOME ! Housing Rehabilitation Commercial Rehabilitation i CDBG-CV HOME ARP Client: Kimberly Mack, Director of Housing, City of Hawthorne 4455 West 126th Street, Hawthorne, CA 90250
[email protected] (310) 349-1603
Puerto Rico - Disaster Recovery Monitoring and Compliance Technical Assistance Subject Matter Expert - Manager September 2019 - Current David provided monitoring and general disaster recovery grant compliance technical assistance to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico through the Puerto Rico Department of Housing (PRDOH), on behalf of the $18.4 billion in CDBG-DR and CDBG-MIT funding from HUD in response to the devastation resulting from the 2017 Hurricane Maria. He worked as a sub -consultant to HORNE LLP in assisting the Commonwealth with developing a monitoring strategy, risk analysis, and providing training to the Commonwealth staff on every aspect of monitoring subrecipients and contractors responsible for implementing projects and programs contained in the CDBG-DR and CDBG-MIT Action Plan. Training included onsite and remote training on HUD monitoring exhibits, contractor and subrecipient oversight, 2 CFR 200 and other statutory and regulatory requirements, scheduling and conducting onsite and desktop monitoring events, preparing monitoring reports, and working with monitored entities to resolve open findings. He also assists the Commonwealth with preparing for HUD monitoring events, inclusive of reviewing and assessing existing monitoring processes for the purpose of strengthening oversight of all funded projects and programs, and preparing for HUD monitoring events. He also provided multiple trainings for Commonwealth staff and participated in several onsite and remote contractor, subrecipient and internal training events.

Programs: CDBG-DR CDBG-MIT OMB 2 CFR Part 200
Client: Ryan Flanery, Director of CDBG-DR Compliance, HORNE Puerto Rico 269 Avenida Juan Ponce de Leon, Hato Rey, PR 00917
[email protected] (727) 510-9588

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
City of Rancho Cucamonga (plus various other cities), Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing Program Manager I June 2018 - Current
David prepared the Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) documents for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in addition to various other cities. In the development of the Consolidated Plan and the Assessment of Fair Housing, he used HUD's new planning framework designed to ensure that HUD grantees take meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. This work included analyses of fair housing data, assessments of fair housing issues and contributing factors, and an identification of fair housing priorities and goals.

His active participation in structuring and conducting community meetings and stakeholder focus groups for both documents underscored his commitment to inclusive engagement, ensuring that diverse perspectives from low- and moderate -income residents and members of protected classes were incorporated into planning efforts. Concurrent with this engagement strategy, he developed and prepared outreach materials such as notices, flyers, social media campaigns, and presentations in English and Spanish.

Through his proficiency in data analytics the foundation for preparation of the AFH and Consolidated Plan was established, by providing invaluable insights into community conditions and needs, thereby facilitating informed decision -making throughout the resource programming and approval processes. Furthermore, he supported the City by crafting strategic investment strategies that address the community's highest priority needs.

Programs: CDBG I HOME I ESG Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Client: Flavio Nunez
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Economic Development Department 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
[email protected] (909) 774-4313

CHRISTOPHER
AUNE
Manager

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Grants Management
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
Zoning
CEQA Review

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
22 Years

CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
Certification

EDUCATION
B.A. Planning and Urban
Studies, Urban Geography,
History
California State University
Northridge

WORK HISTORY
MDG Associates, Inc.
2025 - Present
City of Lancaster
2006-2025
City of Agoura Hills
2005-2006
City of Walnut
2004-2005
MDG
A--sooiaLes. Inc.

Chris Aune is a seasoned planning, housing, and grants management professional with over 21 years of experience in urban development, zoning, permitting, affordable housing initiatives, and public -sector grant administration. Recognized as an "ADU Guru," Chris has led the development and implementation of innovative planning solutions while overseeing federal and state housing grants, including CDBG, HOME, and CalHome programs. His expertise includes preparation of CEQA documentation, administration and compliance of HUD and State housing funds, development of architectural and design guidelines, management of complex affordable housing initiatives, and strategic use of permit -ready ADU programs to expand housing access and streamline approvals. With a strong foundation in Planning and Urban Studies, Chris has played a pivotal role in advancing community -focused, fiscally responsible, and sustainable urban growth strategies.

Chris's portfolio reflects a commitment to creative, context -sensitive development and disciplined program oversight. He has successfully worked on high -impact projects such as the redevelopment of the former Antelope Valley Fairgrounds, citywide scattered -site housing developments, Transit Oriented Development (T.O.D.) Zone guidelines, and the oversight of housing rehabilitation and homeownership programs funded through federal and state grants. His guidance on architectural design standards, stakeholder engagement, fiscal compliance, and coordination with engineering, building, and finance departments has helped cities achieve policy objectives while maintaining regulatory compliance and measurable results.

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
HUD CPD Grant Management
Housing Manager I May 2023 - May 2025
Chris was responsible for the oversight and administration of the City of Lancaster's annual U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Planning and Development (CPD) grant allocations, including the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs. In addition, he managed State of California housing grants, including the CalHome Program administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), as well as other state - funded housing assistance programs supporting rehabilitation and homeownership activities.

In this role, Christopher managed the full grant lifecycle from planning and budget allocation through implementation, reimbursement, and closeout. His responsibilities included ensuring compliance with all grant regulations as well as all crosscutting requirements including the Uniform Administrative Requirements and applicable State HCD guidelines governing State grant funds.

A significant component of his responsibilities included managing third -party consultants responsible for implementing the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program and First -Time Homebuyer Program. Christopher provided direct oversight of consultant contracts, monitored performance metrics, reviewed reimbursement packages, ensured regulatory compliance, and verified adherence to both federal and state requirements. His oversight included confirming compliance with federal labor standards and State prevailing wage requirements where applicable, as well as procurement documentation review to ensure conformity with Uniform Guidance and state contracting rules.

Programs: Current Planning Advanced Planning
Client: Patti Garibay, Director of Community Development, City of Lancaster 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93534

CHRISTOPHER AUNE
Manager

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
Permit -Ready ADUs
Housing Manager ! June 2006 - May 2025
Christopher led the City of Lancaster's Permit -Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program, a strategic initiative aimed at addressing the region's housing shortage by simplifying and expediting the ADU development process. He led a multidisciplinary team that included an architectural design consultant and City Planning and Building staff to develop a suite of pre -approved ADU plans. Recognizing the wide variety of lot sizes, shapes, and neighborhood contexts across Lancaster, Christopher emphasized the importance of design flexibility and encouraged the creation of plans that could adapt to multiple site configurations. Rather than enforce a single architectural standard, he championed the inclusion of diverse and locally appropriate styles —including Bungalow, Mediterranean, and California Ranch —to ensure broader community acceptance and compatibility with existing homes.

The result of this effort was the successful creation of six unique ADU designs that were reviewed and approved in advance by both the Planning and Building divisions. This eliminated the need for individual plan checks for each new ADU application, dramatically reducing permitting timelines and development costs for homeowners. By implementing this forward -thinking program, he helped position the City as a leader in ADU development and provided residents with accessible pathways to expand housing on their properties, contributing to long-term affordability and smart urban growth Programs: ADUs I Planning Housing
Client: Patti Garibay, Director of Community Development, City of Lancaster 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93534
[email protected] (661) 723-6072
Development of the Former Antelope Valley Fairgrounds
Housing Manager June 2006 - May 2025
Christopher led the redevelopment planning process for the former Antelope Valley Fairgrounds, transforming a large, underutilized site into a dynamic mixed -use affordable housing project. He initiated the effort by issuing a comprehensive request for proposals (RFP) and successfully facilitated the selection of a development team composed of Habitat for Humanity and The Grupe Company.

Working closely with the developers and an engineering consultant, Christopher addressed significant challenges related to the site's complex configuration, including numerous existing parcel lines and infrastructure constraints. He provided critical guidance on improving the site layout, optimizing the placement of residential units, open space, and community amenities, and negotiated key provisions of the Exclusive Negotiation Agreements. The resulting plan covers 37 acres and will deliver 382 units of affordable housing alongside a five -acre neighborhood commercial component. Christopher's leadership in managing interdepartmental coordination, stakeholder engagement, and technical analysis ensured that the project advanced in alignment with the City's long- term goals for housing and community revitalization.

Programs: CDBG I Federal Crosscutting
Client: Patti Garibay, Director of Community Development, City of Lancaster 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93534
[email protected] (661) 723-6072

CHRISTOPHER AUNE
Manager

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
Transit Oriented Development (T.O.D) ZONES Development Guidelines Housing Manager ! June 2006 - May 2025
Transit Oriented Development (T.O.D.) Zones in the City of Lancaster, a planning initiative funded by a Sustainable Planning Grant from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO). The goal of the project was to revitalize and intensify the walkable, mixed -use neighborhoods surrounding the downtown core and the Metrolink Station. Christopher began by identifying key stakeholders and organizing a series of community engagement activities, including neighborhood walks, stakeholder meetings, surveys, and outreach to residents, business owners, and faith -based leaders. Acting as the grant manager, he prepared and submitted all required quarterly reports and ensured compliance with grant objectives. He also worked closely with a consultant team to translate community input into a comprehensive set of TOD Zone guidelines, which were finalized in 2015.

These guidelines became a foundational component of the City's long-term strategy to enhance connectivity, support smart growth, and promote reinvestment in its historic downtown and adjacent neighborhoods.

Programs: Transit Development Planning Housing
Client: Patti Garibay, Director of Community Development, City of Lancaster 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93534
[email protected] ! (661) 723-6072
Lancaster Architectural and Design Guidelines
City Planner July 2006 - May 2018
Christopher led the City of Lancaster's effort to develop its first -ever Architectural and Design Guidelines, a transformative project aimed at improving the quality and character of new development citywide. In response to the absence of established design standards, Christopher facilitated the creation of an architectural design commission and organized a series of educational tours for commissioners and staff to study architecture, public spaces, and master -planned communities throughout the Los Angeles region. He coordinated numerous commission meetings to gather input and build consensus on preferred architectural styles, design elements, building placement, and drought -tolerant landscaping. Christopher also oversaw a robust stakeholder engagement process, including outreach to the Building Industry Association, which ultimately endorsed the guidelines. With the assistance of a consultant, the guidelines were drafted and adopted, providing Planning staff with a powerful tool to encourage high -quality, context -sensitive development. The new standards have since helped elevate the design quality of projects across Lancaster, aligning new growth with the community's long-term vision for livability and aesthetics.

Programs: CDBG I Federal Crosscutting
Client: Patti Garibay, Director of Community Development, City of Lancaster 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93534
[email protected] (661) 723-6072

JUAN NUNEZ
Associate

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Labor Compliance
Section 3 Requirements
Davis -Bacon and Related
Acts (DBRA)

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
5 Years

CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING
HUD Section 3 Final Rule
LCPtracker Academy -
Federal Prevailing Wage
LCPtracker Academy -
State Prevailing Wage

EDUCATION
High School Diploma
Rialto High School

WORK HISTORY
MDG Associates, Inc.
2021 - Present
MDG
Assecistss, In_
Juan Nunez leads the company's labor compliance and Section 3 monitoring program.

The labor compliance monitoring has included both State of California as well as the federal Davis -Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA). Juan is responsible for labor compliance monitoring for over 15 cities and over 30 projects. Juan focuses on implementing monitoring strategies to assist cities and contractors through the various labor compliance regulations imposed by federal and state grants.

Juan is responsible for ensuring that all contractors and subcontractors are well informed of the reporting requirements during the pre -bid and pre -construction meetings. He is responsible for collecting, reviewing, and working with contractors on ensuring that all workers are paid prevailing wages as established by the regulatory agencies.

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
City of Irvine - Capital Improvement Projects
Lead Compliance Consultant 12023 -Present
Juan provides the overall labor compliance and Section 3 monitoring for Irvine's CDBG and HOME -funded capital improvement projects. Projects include affordable housing development, Americans with Disabilities Act improvements at a variety of public facilities, and nonprofit -owned facilities rehabilitation projects.

Juan is responsible for Davis -Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) prevailing wage compliance and monitoring, including bid document preparation, HUD -11 employee field interviews, review of certified payroll reports, identification and resolution of any labor standard violations as well as Section 3 reporting and compliance. Juan also coordinates preparation of and the submission of the Semi -Annual and Annual Labor Standards Enforcement reports to local counties and U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Programs: CDBG
Client: Stacy Delong, Senior Project Manager, City of Irvine 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606
[email protected] (949) 473-1237
C&C Development - Lincoln Avenue Apartments
Lead Compliance Consultant 12024 - Present
Juan provides the overall labor compliance and Section 3 monitoring for the project. The project includes new construction of a 55 -unit affordable rental housing development in the City of Buena Park. Layered funding sources triggered federal and state prevailing wage, minority- and women -owned business enterprise, and Section 3 requirements.

Juan is responsible for Davis -Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) prevailing wage compliance and monitoring, including bid document preparation, HUD -11 employee field interviews, review of certified payroll reports, identification and resolution of any labor standard violations as well as MBE/WBE and Section 3 reporting and compliance.

Programs: Low Income Housing Tax Credits, CalOptima Health Grant, HUD Funds Client: Todd Cottle, Principal
14211 Yorba Street, Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780
[email protected] (714) 288-7600

PROJECT SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE
City of Hawthorne - Capital Improvement Projects
Labor Compliance Specialist / Associate 2025 - Current
Juan provides the overall labor compliance and Section 3 monitoring for three Hawthorne capital improvement projects. The three projects consist of the Hawthorne Senior Center; Hawthorne City Yard Facility; and the Holly Park Renovation Project. These three projects have a construction value of $30 Million. In addition, Juan has been assisting the City in the labor compliance review of the bid documents for the City Hall project which is estimated to cost approximately $26 Million.

Juan is responsible for Davis -Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) prevailing wage compliance and monitoring, including bid document preparation, HUD -11 employee field interviews, review of certified payroll reports, identification and resolution of any labor standard violations as well as Section 3 reporting and compliance. Juan also coordinates preparation of and the submission of the Semi - Annual and Annual Labor Standards Enforcement reports to local counties and U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and ensuring that the contactors are submitting certified payrolls through the States labor compliance portal.

Programs: CDBG ' General Funds I Section 108 Loan Funds Client: Kimberly Mack, Director of Housing, City of Hawthorne 4455 West 126th Street, Hawthorne, CA 90250
[email protected] (310) 349-1603
City of Hesperia - Street Improvement Projects
Labor Compliance Specialist / Associate 2024 - Current
Juan provides the overall labor compliance and Section 3 monitoring for five street reconstruction projects. The five street projects have a construction value of approximately $4.8 Million.

Juan is responsible for Davis -Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) prevailing wage compliance and monitoring, including bid document preparation, HUD -11 employee field interviews, review of certified payroll reports, identification and resolution of any labor standard violations as well as Section 3 reporting and compliance. Juan also coordinates preparation of and the submission of the Semi - Annual and Annual Labor Standards Enforcement reports to local counties and U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and ensuring that the contactors are submitting certified payrolls through the States labor compliance portal.

Programs: CDBG Gas Tax General Funds Transportation Grant Funds Client: Deanna Lestina, Project Manager, City of Hesperia 9700 Seventh Avenue, Hesperia, CA 92345
[email protected] (760) 947-1434

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Christopher Williams, Chief of Police
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Acceptance of Donated Ballistic Equipment from the Santa Maria Police Council.

Description:

The City Council will consider approving the receipt of donations of ballistic equipment from the Santa Maria Police Council to enhance safety in the Santa Maria Police Department.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Adopt a Resolution approving a donation of ballistic equipment to the City of Santa Maria Police Department from the Santa Maria Police Council; and

2. Direct the City Manager, or designee, to prepare a letter of appreciation to the Santa Maria Police Council.

BACKGROUND:

The Santa Maria Police Council (SMPC) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation with the mission to serve and support the Santa Maria Police Department (SMPD) by way of purchasing safety materials, equipment, and training for the men and women of the department over and above what the City's operating budget has allocated. Since the SMPC's formation in August 2007, they have donated many items of equipment and funded training for the SMPD.

Government Code Section 37354 provides that the City Council may accept any gift, bequest, or devise made to or for the City, or to or for any of its offices in their official capacity, or in trust for any public purpose. City Administration Memo CAM 2017-01 sets forth procedures for reviewing, accepting, and acknowledging gifts and/or donations offered to the City in order to: 1) establish compliance with the law in a consistent manner regardless of the source of the donation; 2) establish uniform procedures for the receipt of donations to the City; 3) cultivate an environment where residents and businesses want to contribute to the City's programs and facilities; 4) promptly acknowledge and express appreciation for donations; and 5) assure donations are properly inventoried and accounted for.

DISCUSSION:

The donation of safety equipment includes five rifle -rated ballistic shields, three ballistic blankets, and fifteen personal body armor packages, consisting of armor plates, inserts, and plate carriers. This equipment will be used by patrol Officers, SWAT Officers, and Firearms Training Instructors and is essential to safeguard officers during high -risk incidents and enhance the department's ability to train, respond, and protect.

Fiscal Considerations
There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund associated with this donation. The total cost of the ballistic equipment is estimated at $63,349, which will be paid in full by the SMPC.

Impact on the Community
This donation highlights the vital role the Santa Maria Police Department plays in the community, as recognized by the Santa Maria Police Council. The donated equipment and associated training will significantly enhance the safety of both police officers and the community, further supporting the department's ongoing efforts to protect and serve.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
2 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

APPROVING A DONATION OF BALLISTIC EQUIPMENT TO THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM THE

SANTA MARIA POLICE COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the Santa Maria Police Council has donated ballistic equipment with an estimated value of $63,349; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 37354 provides that the City Council may accept any gift, bequest, or devise made to or for the City, or to or for any of its officers in their official capacity or in trust for any public purpose; and WHEREAS, the City's Gift and/or Donation Policy CAM 2017-01 requires offers of monetary donations or items valued more than $25,000 must be accepted by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. Accept the donation of ballistic equipment from the Santa Maria Police Council in the estimated amount of $63,349, and direct the City Manager, or designee, to prepare a letter of appreciation to the Santa Maria Police Council; and SECTION 2. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary. ///
///
///

Attachment A
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving Authorization to Submit an Active Transportation Program Grant Application
Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution authorizing submission of an application to the California Active Transportation Program for a proposed citywide multi- purpose trail system intended to create a connected active transportation loop around Santa Maria with links to Downtown/Civic Center, the Transit Center, Allan Hancock College, neighborhoods, schools, parks, and other major destinations.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Adopt a Resolution authorizing submission of an Active Transportation Program grant application; and

2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute and submit all documents required for the application.

BACKGROUND:

The City continues to pursue grant funding for projects that improve walking, bicycling, and rolling throughout Santa Maria and that expand access to key destinations for residents of all ages and abilities. The California Active Transportation Program (ATP) is one of the State's primary competitive funding sources for bicycle, pedestrian, and other active transportation improvements. The program is intended to increase the use of active transportation modes, improve safety and mobility for nonmotorized users, enhance public health, and ensure disadvantaged communities share in the benefits of transportation investment. The current Cycle 8 call for projects is open, with statewide and small urban/rural applications due June 22, 2026.

Staff has been developing a concept for a citywide active transportation loop that would function as a backbone facility for Santa Maria's bicycle and pedestrian network. The concept generally envisions a multi -purpose trail loop around the community, with strategic on -street and crossing improvements to connect major destinations including

Downtown/Civic Center, the Transit Center, Allan Hancock College, schools, parks, neighborhoods, and commercial areas.

A substantial portion of the concept builds on opportunities along existing maintenance roads adjacent to the Blosser Channel and Bradley Channel, together with targeted roadway realignment and corridor reconfiguration opportunities on streets such as Main Street east of U.S. 101, Blosser Road, Depot Street, Bradley Road, College Drive, and Panther Drive.

Santa Barbara County Flood Control has indicated support for the concept at a planning level. Continued coordination will be necessary during project development to ensure access and operational needs for channel maintenance are preserved.

Staff has also introduced the concept to members of the local bicycling community and received initial feedback. That feedback emphasized the importance of designing safe and intuitive crossings, keeping the trail alignment as direct as feasible near intersections, providing accessible detection and push-button treatments without requiring users to dismount, and ensuring uninterrupted connections at key points in the network.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed Santa Maria Loop Multi -Use Trail Project is intended to create a highly visible, citywide active transportation spine that serves both transportation and recreation purposes. Rather than focusing on one isolated segment, the project concept is designed to connect major community destinations into a continuous network that can be used for daily trips, school access, transit access, and recreational walking and bicycling.

At a planning level, the concept includes a combination of off-street and corridor -based improvements. Key elements may include: enhancement of existing channel -adjacent maintenance roads for shared use where feasible; roadway realignment or reconfiguration to accommodate separated active transportation facilities; protected or high -visibility crossings at major intersections and channel crossings; ADA-accessible access points and intersection controls; wayfinding and branding elements; and other supporting improvements needed to create a continuous and intuitive facility.

The project is well aligned with ATP objectives. The ATP guidelines emphasize projects that increase walking, biking, and rolling; improve safety and mobility for nonmotorized users; benefit disadvantaged communities; and deliver transformative community or regional benefits. The guidelines specifically encourage projects that significantly expand active transportation opportunities and create accessible facilities usable by persons with or without disabilities. Staff believes the proposed loop concept is responsive to those objectives because it would establish a recognizable citywide corridor system that improves network continuity, expands access to important destinations, and has the potential to deliver broad community benefit across multiple neighborhoods.

The current application effort would allow the City to further refine the concept and assemble a competitive ATP submission. As part of that effort, staff anticipates the need 2 for additional design ideation and conceptual planning, particularly at intersections, roadway transitions, channel crossings, and other locations where continuity and user comfort will be critical to project success. Early community engagement will also be important. Staff intend to continue coordination with the bicycling community and other stakeholders.

In addition to mobility and safety benefits, the proposed loop presents an opportunity to create a signature Santa Maria active transportation facility. Staff intends to explore project branding as the application advances. A clear and memorable identity may strengthen both public support and the competitiveness of the grant application. Staff also intends to explore opportunities to recognize Santa Maria history and community leadership through naming, interpretive elements, or dedications, potentially in coordination with the Santa Maria Valley Historical Society and other local partners.

Authorization from the City Council at this time would allow staff to proceed with submission of the ATP application and completion of the associated forms and supporting materials. If the project is selected for funding, staff would return to the City Council as needed for future actions related to grant acceptance, appropriations, agreements, environmental review, and project delivery.

Alternatives)

1. Do not adopt the Resolution
If the City Council does not authorize submission of the application, the City would forgo the opportunity to compete for ATP funding in the current cycle for this project concept.

2. Adopt the Resolution with direction to modify the application emphasis The City Council may choose to authorize submission of the application while directing staff to emphasize particular destinations, corridors, branding concepts, or project elements in the final application package.

Fiscal Considerations
Preparation of the grant application will require staff time and will require consultant support for conceptual engineering, graphics, cost estimating, and application preparation. Those costs are expected to be funded through existing departmental budgets. The total grant amount to be requested through the ATP application is currently estimated at approximately $30 million. The grant scoring provides additional points for leveraging local funds, with 1 point (out of 100) for 1 to 5 percent of total project cost to be funded by local match. Up to 5 points can be scored, with more than 20 percent of the project costs having to be funded by local match.
3 Points
Amount Leveraged
1 Point
At least 1% to 5% of total project cost
2 Points
More than 5% to 10% of total project cost
3 Paints
More than 10% to 15% of total project cost
4 Points
More than 15% to 20% of total project cost
5 Points
More than 20% of total project cost
Staff will evaluate how existing roadway funding sources such as Measure A funds that must be spent on active transportation elements can be leveraged. Staff recommends leveraging Growth Mitigation funds identified for active transportation projects if they are available and relevant to the proposed project. Staff will refine the project estimate and funding plan prior to submittal to maximize scoring, but at this time a local match of $6 million may be utilized.

If the project is awarded funding, staff will return to the City Council with any required actions related to grant acceptance, budget amendments, matching funds, and implementation.

Impact on the Community
If funded and implemented, the project would provide a major new community asset intended to improve safety, expand mobility options, and improve access to schools, transit, parks, employment areas, and civic destinations. The project would support residents who walk, bike, and roll for transportation and recreation, including youth, older adults, and persons with disabilities. The project also has the potential to strengthen neighborhood connectivity, encourage healthy activity, and create a more identifiable and cohesive citywide active transportation network.

Other Agency Review
The project concept has been discussed at a preliminary level with Santa Barbara County Flood Control, which has expressed support for continued advancement of the concept, subject to maintaining access and functionality for flood control maintenance operations.

Continued coordination with Flood Control, Caltrans where applicable, SBCAG, transit partners, school representatives, the bicycling community, and other stakeholders will be part of the project development process.

ATTACHMENT(S)
A. Resolution
4 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the California Transportation Commission has issued a call for projects for Cycle 8 of the Active Transportation Program, with applications due June 22, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Active Transportation Program is intended to increase the use of active transportation modes, improve safety and mobility for nonmotorized users, enhance public health, support greenhouse gas reduction efforts, and ensure disadvantaged communities share in the benefits of the program; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria desires to submit an application for funding for the proposed multi -purpose trail system intended to improve active transportation connectivity throughout the City and provide connections to key destinations including Downtown/Civic Center, the Transit Center, Allan Hancock College, neighborhoods, schools, parks, and other community destinations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project concept may include improvements along existing channel -adjacent maintenance roads, roadway realignment and reconfiguration, crossing improvements, accessibility improvements, wayfinding, and related improvements necessary to create a continuous and safe active transportation facility; and
WHEREAS, the Active Transportation Program is intended to increase the use of active transportation modes, improve safety and mobility for nonmotorized users, enhance public health, support greenhouse gas reduction efforts, and ensure disadvantaged communities share in the benefits of the program; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that submission of the grant application is in the public interest and will allow the City to compete for external funding to advance a transformative active transportation project for the community.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes submission of an application to the California Active Transportation Program.

SECTION 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute and submit the grant application and any supporting documents, assurances, certifications, and other materials required to apply for Active Transportation Program funding for the project.

Attachment A
SECTION 3. The City Council acknowledges that if funding is awarded, future City Council action may be required for grant acceptance, budget appropriations, matching funds, environmental review, agreements, and project implementation, as applicable; and SECTION 4. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Approving a Proposed Establishment of Limited Time Parking Zones and No Stopping Zones On Carmen Lane Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution establishing two-hour maximum parking zones on each side of Carmen Lane, with No Stopping Zones starting 50 feet west of the railroad terminus to the terminus, to provide short-term parking for users of the new dog park while the long-term roadway improvements are developed.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing limited time parking zones and no stopping zones on Carmen Lane.

BACKGROUND:

A request was received from the City of Santa Maria Recreation and Parks Department to modify the existing no stopping zones along Carmen Lane near the new dog park and adjacent development to allow two-hour maximum parking. The park opened in February 2026, and staff is evaluating options to provide short-term parking opportunities for park users. The request would involve replacing the existing No Stopping restrictions on both sides of Carmen Lane, from Western Avenue to the railroad terminus, with time -limited parking.

The Committee noted that this segment of Carmen Lane was previously discussed during the review of the proposed roadway alignment adjacent to Jimenez Elementary School.

A roadway alignment concept was approved by City Council; however, insufficient funds and staff resources are currently available to advance the project. Staff anticipates recommending this effort be included as a future Capital Improvement Project. The two- hour parking zone is intended as an interim measure until long-term roadway improvements can be completed.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63-15, a Traffic Committee was formed to "be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way." The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request and recommends approval of the two-hour parking zone with the addition of 50 linear feet of no stopping zone at each end of Carmen Lane. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate parking zones within the City.

The two-hour maximum parking zone and no stopping zones recommended to be established are described as follows:
• Carmen Lane, 2 -Hour Maximum Parking, along the northerly curb face, beginning 20 linear feet east of the curb return of the northeast curb ramp of the intersection of Carmen Lane and South Western Avenue and continuing 510 linear feet east, then resuming 20 linear feet east of the curb return of the northeast curb ramp of the intersection of Carmen Lane and Bay Rose Place and continuing an additional 560 linear feet east.
• Carmen Lane, 2 -Hour Maximum Parking, along the southerly curb face, beginning 20 linear feet east of the curb return of the southeast curb ramp of the intersection of Carmen Lane and South Western Avenue and continuing 540 linear feet east, then resuming after the ramp and continuing an additional 630 linear feet east. • Carmen Lane, No Stopping Zone, along the northerly curb face, beginning at the railroad terminus and continuing 50 linear feet west.
• Carmen Lane, No Stopping Zone, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the railroad terminus and continuing 50 linear feet west.

Alternative(s)
The alternative to the recommended action would be to not approve the establishment of the limited time parking zones and no stopping zones.

Fiscal Considerations
The Public Works Department will be responsible for installing two-hour parking signage and red curb along Carmen Lane. Staff has estimated the cost of sign and red curb installation to be approximately $1,200 in staff time and materials. 2 Impact on the Community
The establishment of time -limited parking will provide short-term parking access for users of the new dog park along Carmen Lane while discouraging long-term vehicle storage.

The no stopping zones at the railroad terminus will maintain safety at the end of the parking area for vehicles that need to complete a turnaround. This is an interim measure pending future Capital Improvement Project funding for long-term roadway improvements.

ATTACHMENT(S)
A. Resolution
B. Location Map
3 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING LIMITED TIME PARKING ZONES AND

NO STOPPING ZONES ON CARMEN LANE
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish limited time parking zones on certain streets within the City; and WHEREAS, City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of two-hour maximum parking zones and no stopping zones at the locations described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, two-hour maximum parking zones and no stopping zones shall be established on the following street, incorporated herein by reference, at the following locations by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
• Carmen Lane, 2 -Hour Maximum Parking, along the northerly curb face, beginning 20 linear feet east of the curb return of the northeast curb ramp of the intersection of Carmen Lane and South Western Avenue and continuing 510 linear feet east, then resuming 20 linear feet east of the curb return of the northeast curb ramp of the intersection of Carmen Lane and Bay Rose Place and continuing an additional 560 linear feet east.
• Carmen Lane, 2 -Hour Maximum Parking, along the southerly curb face, beginning 20 linear feet east of the curb return of the southeast curb ramp of the intersection of Carmen Lane and South Western Avenue and continuing 540 linear feet east, then resuming after the ramp and continuing an additional 630 linear feet east. • Carmen Lane, No Stopping Zone, along the northerly curb face, beginning at the railroad terminus and continuing 50 linear feet west.
• Carmen Lane, No Stopping Zone, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the railroad terminus and continuing 50 linear feet west.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance; and
SECTION 2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

Attachment A
SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

(P) 2 HOUR

PARKING

SIGNAGE
(TYP)
(P) 2 HOUR PARKING
0 25 50 100 Feel
I l I r 1
Esti Comm County Of San Luis OiDisoo,
lec`rnologle s. I ic, MEl UM
Attachment B
(P) NSZ
(P) NSZ
OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTorn, Gaani n. Safes Land Manacersient. EPA, MPS, US Census Bureau USJ,",, L

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Approving a Proposed Establishment of Limited Time Parking Zones with Street Sweeping Signage on West Cypress Street and South Depot Street
Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution establishing limited time parking zones with street sweeping signage on the 700 block of West Cypress Street and the 200-300 blocks of South Depot Street to facilitate regular street sweeping operations.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing limited time parking zones with street sweeping signage on the 700 block of West Cypress Street and the 200-300 blocks of South Depot Street.

BACKGROUND:

A request was received from the Recreation & Parks Department, to establish Limited Time Parking Zones for street sweeping purposes along the 700 block of West Cypress Street and the 200-300 blocks of South Depot Street. Numerous vehicles displaying 'For Sale' signage are routinely parked along these streets and often remain unmoved for extended periods, significantly impeding street sweeping operations.

Street sweeping on the 700 block of West Cypress Street and the west side of the 200- 300 blocks of South Depot Street occurs on Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. Street sweeping on the east side of the 200-300 blocks of South Depot Street occurs on Fridays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63-15, a Traffic Committee was formed to "be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way." The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request and recommends

the establishment of limited time parking zones with street sweeping signage. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate parking zones within the City.

The limited time parking zones recommended to be established are described as follows:
• West Cypress Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the northerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the northwest curb ramp of the intersection of West Cypress Street and South Depot Street and continuing 45 linear feet west to the driveway apron, then resuming after the driveway apron and continuing an additional 115 linear feet west. • West Cypress Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwest curb ramp of the intersection of West Cypress Street and South Depot Street and continued to 220 linear feet west.
• South Depot Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the westerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwest curb ramp of the intersection of South Depot Street and West Church Street and continuing 275 linear feet south.
• South Depot Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the westerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwest curb ramp of the intersection of South Depot Street and West Cypress Street and continuing 290 linear feet south.
• South Depot Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Fridays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the easterly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southeast curb ramp of the intersection of South Depot Street and West Church Street and continuing 275 linear feet south.
• South Depot Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the easterly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southeast curb ramp of the intersection of South Depot Street and West Cypress Street and continuing 290 linear feet south.

Alternative(s'
The alternative to the recommended action would be to not approve the establishment of the limited time parking zones with street sweeping signage.

Fiscal Considerations
Implementation will require the installation of new sign poles and street sweeping signage along both streets. The Public Works Department estimates the cost of poles and sign installation to be approximately $1,800 in staff time and materials.

Impact on the Community
2 The limited time parking restrictions will apply only during the designated street sweeping windows (two hours per week per block face) and will not affect parking at other times.

Vehicles in violation during sweeping hours may be subject to citation.

ATTACHMENT(S)
A. Resolution
B. Location Map
3 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING LIMITED TIME PARKING ZONES WITH
STREET SWEEPING SIGNAGE ON THE 700 BLOCK OF WEST
CYPRESS STREET AND THE 200-300 BLOCKS OF

SOUTH DEPOT STREET
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish limited time parking zones with street sweeping signage on certain streets within the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of limited time parking zones with street sweeping signage at the locations described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, limited time zones with street sweeping signage shall be established on the following streets, incorporated herein by reference, at the following locations by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
• West Cypress Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the northerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the northwest curb ramp of the intersection of West Cypress Street and South Depot Street and continuing 45 linear feet west to the driveway apron, then resuming after the driveway apron and continuing an additional 115 linear feet west. • West Cypress Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwest curb ramp of the intersection of West Cypress Street and South Depot Street and continuing 220 linear feet west.
• South Depot Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the westerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwest curb ramp of the intersection of South Depot Street and West Church Street and continuing 275 linear feet south.
• South Depot Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the westerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwest curb ramp of the intersection of South Depot Street and West Cypress Street and continuing 290 linear feet south.
• South Depot Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Fridays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the easterly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southeast curb ramp of the intersection of South Depot Street and West Church Street and continuing 275 linear feet south.
• South Depot Street, No Parking for Street Sweeping, Thursdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., along the easterly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southeast curb ramp of the intersection of South Depot Street and West Cypress Street and continuing 290 linear feet south.

Attachment A
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBYRESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance; and
SECTION 2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

(P) LTP for street sweeping
(P) LTP for street sweeping
(E) "Angled Parking" signs
(P) LTP for street sweeping
0 25 50 100 Feet

I I I I I I
Attachment B
(P) LTP for street sweeping
(P) LTP for street sweeping
I �m_artitVf t ps C i ti r)JIJi5 i o_i, t. I..1 I U_r_. Gb su p. Min o ft T..iTimr rin'f1 ftGIa I G oT it
w4; f
lI ( F!I �aI c f it �cemeIt EPA'` PS, US e-
r ifo piG St
oyIF �!7c,
Bu e; !J, U:

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Proposed Establishment of a No Stopping Zone on Alvin Avenue
Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution establishing a no stopping zone at the northwest corner of Alvin Avenue and North Railroad Avenue to maintain clear access for City maintenance crews servicing nearby electrical cabinets.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a no stopping zone on Alvin Avenue at North Railroad Avenue.

BACKGROUND:

A request was received from City Operations staff to install approximately 40 feet of red curb at the northwest corner of Alvin Avenue and North Railroad Avenue. Vehicles parking in this area have created access challenges for maintenance crews attempting to service nearby electrical cabinets and perform routine work. The request proposes establishing a no stopping zone through red curb installation to maintain clear access for service vehicles and improve operational safety.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63-15, a Traffic Committee was formed to "be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way." The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for a no stopping zone and recommends its establishment. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate no stopping zones within the City.

The no stopping zone recommended to be established is described as follows:
• Alvin Avenue, along the northerly curb face, at the northwest corner of the Alvin Avenue and North Railroad Avenue intersection, extending approximately 40 linear feet westerly.

Alternative(s)
The alternative to the recommended action would be to not approve the establishment of the no stopping zone.

Fiscal Considerations
The Public Works Department will be responsible for painting the red curb. Staff has estimated the cost to be approximately $400 in staff time and materials.

Impact on the Community
Approximately two on -street parking spaces will be removed to maintain clear access for City Operations maintenance crews servicing the electrical infrastructure at this location.

ATTACHMENT(S)
A. Resolution
B. Location Map
2 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING A NO STOPPING ZONE ON ALVIN AVENUE

AT NORTH RAILROAD AVENUE
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish a no stopping zone at certain locations within the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of a no stopping zone at the location described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, a no stopping zone shall be established on the following street, incorporated herein by reference, at the following location by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
• Alvin Avenue, along the northerly curb face, at the northwest corner of the Alvin Avenue and North Railroad Avenue intersection, extending approximately 40 linear feet westerly.

NOW, THEREFORE, ITS HEREBYRESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance; and
SECTION 2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary. ///

Attachment A
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

(P) NSZ
25 50 100 Feet
AIvi n,A.ve
Esri
Attachment B
State P„rc , r penStreetr o. M:r_r soft, Esri, Tomlor, Gaimjn,.SateGraoh, of L%: i CI'c;,serrerit. EPA; NPS, US Census BureUu, USDA, US[WS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Approving the Proposed Establishment of a Loading Zone on West Boone Street
Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution for the removal of angle parking and establishing a loading zone on West Boone Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue to alleviate recurring traffic congestion caused by semi -truck deliveries to 706 West Boone Street.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing a Loading Zone on West Boone Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue.

BACKGROUND:

Staff received a request from the Police Department to remove the existing angled parking on West Boone Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue and replace it with an unrestricted loading zone. Currently, semi -trucks servicing ABC Supply Company, whose site lacks adequate on -site loading space, are required to stop and unload in the travel lane. When this occurs, vehicles are unable to maneuver around the trucks, resulting in traffic congestion and circulation issues along the corridor.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63-15, a Traffic Committee was formed to "be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way." The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request and recommends the establishment of a loading zone. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate loading zones within the City.

The loading zone recommended to be established is described as follows:
• West Boone Street, begin at the back of curb return of the curb ramp located at the southwest corner of the South Depot Avenue and West Boone Street intersection and extend westerly for 235 feet.

Alternative(s)
The alternative to the recommended action would be to not approve the establishment of the loading zone.

Fiscal Considerations
The Public Works Department will be responsible for installing loading zone signage. Staff has estimated the cost of sign installation to be approximately $600 in staff time and materials. No yellow curb painting is required.

Impact on the Community
Removal of the angle parking will eliminate several on -street parking spaces along West Boone Street between South Depot Street and South Railroad Avenue. However, the change is expected to significantly reduce traffic congestion caused by semi -truck deliveries blocking the travel lane.

ATTACHMENT(S)
A. Resolution
B. Location Map
2 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING A LOADING ZONE ON WEST BOONE STREET

BETWEEN SOUTH DEPOT STREET AND

SOUTH RAILROAD AVENUE
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish loading zones on certain streets within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending establishment of a loading zone at the location described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, a loading zone shall be established on the following street, incorporated herein by reference, at the following location by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
• West Boone Street, begin at the back of curb return of the curb ramp located at the southwest corner of the South Depot Avenue and West Boone Street intersection and extend westerly for 235 feet.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBYRESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance; and
SECTION 2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto; and SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary. ///
///
///

Attachment A
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

0 5 10 20 Feet
(P) LOADING ZONE
buto1 ?nty Of Sar'.
ec'inologi
Attachment B
Boone
ii , State Par<s, (K, iStrePtfa.q•fi.; r osott. Esri, Tor.Tom, Garmm. SafeGraph, Gs. L.,_re a l L� ,t 1L1 1,(,,en•er_ : LI :t,• NPS• US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Proposed Establishment of No Stopping Zones on Bethel Lane
Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution establishing no stopping zones on Bethel Lane near the intersection of Stowell Road and South Blosser Road to protect newly improved approach striping and improve traffic flow.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution to establishing no stopping zones on Bethel Lane at the intersection of Stowell Road and South Blosser Road.

BACKGROUND:

A request was received from the City of Santa Maria Public Works Department to evaluate the installation of no stopping zones near the intersection of Stowell Road and South Blosser Road following recent approach striping improvements. Vehicles have been observed parking within the newly striped areas, reducing available space for vehicle maneuvering and creating potential operational concerns at the intersection. The Traffic Committee reviewed the request and approved establishing the no stopping zones through signage rather than red curb painting.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63-15, a Traffic Committee was formed to "be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way." The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for no stopping zones and recommends its establishment via signage. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate no stopping zones within the City.

The no stopping zones recommended to be established are described as follows:
• Bethel Lane, along the northerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the northwest curb ramp of the intersection of Bethel Lane and South Blosser Road and continuing 145 linear feet west.
• Bethel Lane, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwest curb ramp of the intersection of Bethel Lane and South Blosser Road and continuing 145 linear feet west.

Alternative(s)
The alternative to the recommended action would be to not approve the establishment of the no stopping zones.

Fiscal Considerations
The Public Works Department will be responsible for installing the no stopping signage.

Staff has estimated the cost of sign installation to be approximately $800 in staff time and materials. No red curb painting is required.

Impact on the Community
The no stopping zones will maintain clear roadway space within the newly striped approach areas, improving traffic flow and vehicle maneuvering at the intersection. The use of signage rather than red curb minimizes visual impact

ATTACHMENT(S)
A. Resolution
B. Location Map
2 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING NO STOPPING ZONES ON BETHEL LANE

AT THE INTERSECTION OF STOWELL ROAD

AND SOUTH BLOSSER ROAD
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish no stopping zones at certain locations within the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of no stopping zones at the location described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, no stopping zones shall be established on the following street, incorporated herein by reference, at the following location by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
• Bethel Lane, along the northerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the northwest curb ramp of the intersection of Bethel Lane and South Blosser Road and continuing 145 linear feet west.
• Bethel Lane, along the southerly curb face, beginning at the curb return of the southwest curb ramp of the intersection of Bethel Lane and South Blosser Road and continuing 145 linear feet west.

SECTION 1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance; and
SECTION 2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto; and SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary. ///
///

Attachment A
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

(P) NSZ
(TYP)
0 25 50 100 Feet
zre�rrv��g
nia er ertt
Attachment B
crdsoft, ` �,iq TomTom, § u n.. SafeG pl
Bureau, USDA, USFW

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Proposed Establishment of No Stopping Zones on Suey Crossing Road
Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution approving the establishment of no stopping zones on Suey Crossing Road at the southeast property driveway of 1670 E Donovan Road to improve sight distance and operational safety for vehicles entering and exiting the property.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing no stopping zones on Suey Crossing Road.

BACKGROUND:

A request was received from the Santa Maria Fire Department to evaluate red curb installation near Fire Station No. 5 along Suey Crossing Road at East Donovan Road.

The request is intended to improve visibility for vehicles entering or exiting the station.

Santa Maria Municipal Code Section 7-5.01 restricts parking within 15 feet of a fire station driveway; however, additional red curb is being considered to further enhance sight distance and operational safety. The Traffic Committee reviewed the request and approved painting 80 linear feet of red curb continuing southwest from the driveway apron as well as 40 linear feet continuing northeast from the driveway apron.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63-15, a Traffic Committee was formed to "be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way." The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for the no stopping zones and recommends its establishment. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate no stopping zones within the City.

The no stopping zones recommended to be established is described as follows:
• Suey Crossing Road, along the southwesterly curb face, beginning at the edge of the southeast property driveway of 1670 East Donovan Road and continuing 80 linear feet southwest.
• Suey Crossing Road, along the northeasterly curb face, beginning at the edge of the southeast property driveway of 1670 East Donovan Road and continuing 40 linear feet northeast.

Alternative(s)
The alternative to the recommended action would be to not approve the establishment of the no stopping zones.

Fiscal Considerations
The Public Works Department will be responsible for painting the red curb. Staff has estimated the cost to be approximately $500 in staff time and materials.

Imact on the Community
The no stopping zones will remove approximately three legal on -street parking spaces adjacent to 1670 East Donovan Road to ensure vehicles can safely enter and exit the property with adequate sight distance

ATTACHMENT(S)
A. Resolution
B. Location Map
2 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING NO STOPPING ZONES

ON SUEY CROSSING ROAD
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish no stopping zones at certain locations within the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of no stopping zones at the locations described below.

WHEREAS, that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, no stopping zones shall be established on the following street, incorporated herein by reference, at the following location by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
• Suey Crossing Road, along the southwesterly curb face, beginning at the edge of the southeast property driveway of 1670 East Donovan Road and continuing 80 linear feet southwest.
• Suey Crossing Road, along the northeasterly curb face, beginning at the edge of the southeast property driveway of 1670 East Donovan Road and continuing 40 linear feet northeast
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance; and
SECTION 2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto; and SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

Attachment A
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

D0n0uan ftd
0 25 50 100 Feet
I i I i I
(P) NSZ
(TYP)
Attachment B

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Department Director of Public Works DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Proposed Establishment of a No Stopping Zone on West Boone Street and South Western Avenue Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution approving the establishment of no stopping zones on both sides of the property driveways located at 1026 West Boone Street, to improve sight distance and reduce traffic safety conflicts at the driveway aprons.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing no stopping zones on West Boone Street and South Western Avenue.

BACKGROUND:

A request was received from the property manager of Los Adobes de Maria, to establish no stopping zones on both sides of the property driveways on West Boone Street and South Western Avenue. Vehicles are frequently parked close to the driveway aprons, which limits sight distance and makes it difficult for drivers exiting the site to see oncoming traffic without encroaching into the travel lanes. There are currently no recorded traffic collisions associated with either driveway location.

DISCUSSION:

Per City Council Resolution No. 2061 and CAM 63-15, a Traffic Committee was formed to "be responsible for the review, approval or denial, and recommendations to City Council on all matters and requests relating to traffic circulation and safety within the public right-of-way." The Traffic Committee has reviewed the request for no stopping zones and recommends their establishment. The City Council has the authority to locate, establish, or eliminate no stopping zones within the City.

The no stopping zones recommended to be established are described as follows:
• West Boone Street, approximately 20 linear feet of red curb on each side of the westerly property driveway of 1026 West Boone Street.
• South Western Avenue, approximately 20 linear feet of red curb on each side of the southerly property driveway of 1026 West Boone Street.

Alternatives)
The alternative to the recommended action would be to not approve the establishment of the no stopping zones.

Fiscal Considerations
The Public Works Department will be responsible for painting the red curb. Staff has estimated the cost of red curb installation to be approximately $400 in staff time and materials.

Impact on the Community
Approximately three on -street parking spaces will be removed to improve sight distance and safety at the 1026 West Boone Street driveway aprons.

ATTACHMENT'S)
A. Resolution
B. Location Map
2 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING NO STOPPING ZONES ON WEST BOONE

STREET AND SOUTH WESTERN AVENUE
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Santa Maria to establish a no stopping zone at certain locations within the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Maria Traffic Committee has reviewed and is recommending the establishment of a no stopping zone at the locations described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 7-5.14 of the Santa Maria Municipal Code, a no stopping zone shall be established on the following streets, incorporated herein by reference, at the following locations by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:
• West Boone Street, approximately 20 linear feet of red curb on each side of the westerly property driveway of 1026 West Boone Street. • South Western Avenue, approximately 20 linear feet of red curb on each side of the southerly property driveway of 1026 West Boone Street.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing shall constitute traffic regulations pursuant to ordinance; and
SECTION 2. All work is to be accomplished using the standards and methods approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. This shall be in accordance with standard City specifications, and the provisions of this resolution are to be carried out by erecting signs, painting marks and temporary markers and barricades required, and by such other indicators or devices as may be under provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of California and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

Attachment A
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, held this 5th day of May 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

mi T. C alifoi 3 State F.,11 <>
kfLI1./N ,.'J5__. L•._i•e_.:i (3i
Sheet i , I, r'Ott. ESH., Turr T . ;i, Ga ri i. `;tit ]h. i i it rd_LI IJI' . iJS AL cu_ 3_I III LI I

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brett Fulgoni, Director of Public Works
DATE: May 5, 2026
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for Senate Bill 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Description:

The City Council will consider adopting a Resolution approving a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

Environmental Notice: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution adopting a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026-27 funded by Senate Bill 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

BACKGROUND:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, Senate Bill 1 (SB-1), was passed by the State Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017. The purpose of the bill is to help state and local agencies address transportation funding shortfalls. SB-1 has generated revenue through increases in gas tax, vehicle registration fees, and fees on zero -emission vehicles.

One of the major components of SB-1 is the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), which allocates funding specifically for roadway maintenance and rehabilitation. SB-1 is expected to generate over $5 billion annually at full implementation, with $1.5 billion distributed to local agencies through the RMRA. The City of Santa Maria is projected to receive $3,148,391 in RMRA revenues for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27, an increase of $178,723 from the 2025-2026 allocation.

SB-1 includes accountability and transparency provisions to keep local residents informed about proposed projects in their area. As part of these requirements, local agencies must adopt a project list prior to the start of each fiscal year. This list must include description and location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement. This list must be approved by the City Council

via Resolution and submitted to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) no later than July 1, 2026, to remain eligible for RMRA funding.

The primary focus of the RMRA is the maintenance of existing infrastructure within the City's rights -of -way. Other transportation funding sources, such as Gas Tax, Measure A, LSTP (Local Surface Transportation Program), Growth Mitigation, and other grant programs remain available for capital expenditures through the normal budget process.

On June 3, 2025, the City Council approved the RMRA project list for FY 2025-26, which was submitted to the CTC as required. That list consisted of the roads in the City to receive a grind and overlay. The project was allocated a total of $3,200,000, comprised of $2,901,998 RMRA funds, and $298,0002 in Gas Tax funds. The project selection was based on eligibility and the City's Pavement Management Program. The previously approved project for FY 2025-26 was:

SB-1 RMRA Funded Projects for Fiscal Year 2025-26:

1. Enhanced Asphalt Maintenance
This project will include the enhanced asphalt maintenance of North College Drive, North Miller Street, east Donovan Road and Mahoney Road in the City of Santa Maria. The work will consist of grinding and overlaying these arterial roadways.

Additionally, the project will include the installation of new striping and pavement markings.

Location:

North College Drive: Main Street to Donovan Road
North Miller Street: Main Street to Donovan Road
East Donovan Road: Lynne Drive to Carlotti Drive
Mahoney Road: Black Road to Betteravia Road
DISCUSSION:

Staff have identified a new pavement rehabilitation project for RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27. This project is identified as Enhanced Asphalt Maintenance. It is eligible for RMRA funds and can be completed within the fiscal year.

SB-1 RMRA Funded Projects for Fiscal Year 2026-27:

1. Enhanced Asphalt Maintenance
A detailed description of the project is included in the Resolution.

Approval of the Resolution will allow the City to submit the project to the CTC before the July 1, 2026, deadline and maintain eligibility for FY 2026-27 RMRA funding.

This action does not preclude the City from using these funds for other eligible roadway maintenance projects during FY 2026-27. If the City decides to utilize the funds for 2 alternate projects, updated reporting to the CTC will be completed at the end of the fiscal year, as required.

Future RMRA project lists will be identified as part of the Pavement Management Program. Projected funding will also support infrastructure improvements such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, underground utilities, and drainage systems.

Alternatives)
The recommended action is to approve the SB-1 RMRA Project List for FY 2026-27.

Alternatively, the City Council may direct staff to revise the project list to include alternate locations. However, per SB-1 requirements, the list must be approved by resolution and submitted to the CTC no later than July 1, 2026. Delays may jeopardize timely funding eligibility.

Fiscal Considerations
Approval of the Resolution enables the City to request SB-1 apportionment revenues for FY 2026-27. The CTC will review statewide submittals and adopt project lists at its August 2026 meeting.

Impact on the Community
The community will benefit from transportation revenues that support improvements to Santa Maria's roadways.

Other Agency Review
No outside agency review was required. The approved list will be submitted to the CTC.

ATTACHMENT(S)
A. Resolution
B. LSR Projected Revenues 2025-2026 and 2026-2027
C. LSR Estimates 2025-2026, 2026-2027
3 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA
ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1, THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multimodal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB-1 includes accountability and transparency provisions to ensure that residents of the City are made aware of the projects proposed for funding in the community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project's completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City is projected to receive $3,148,391 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB-1; and
WHEREAS, this is the tenth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding, which enables the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, the repair and replacement of aging bridges, and increases in access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, City staff uses the Pavement Management Program to develop the SB- 1 project list to ensure revenues are used on the highest -priority and cost-effective projects that also reflect community priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB-1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate various roadways throughout the City this year and support the inclusion of active transportation infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City's streets and roads are in a lower "At -Risk" condition and this revenue will improve the overall quality of the road system, with the goal of bringing the network into "Good" condition over the next decade; and

Attachment A
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in local streets and roads infrastructure, focusing on basic maintenance, safety, complete streets, and the use of advanced technology, materials, and practices, will have significant positive co -benefits statewide.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Maria, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27 will incorporate funding for the following proposed project to be funded in part or in full with Fiscal Year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
1) Enhanced Asphalt Maintenance Project.

Description:

This project will include enhanced asphalt maintenance on one or more of the roadways listed below within the City of Santa Maria, as prioritized by the City's Pavement Management Program. The work will consist of selective digouts, grinding, and partial or full -width overlay treatments on arterial and collector streets. Additionally, the project will include the installation or replacement of striping and pavement markings, as needed.

Project limits, specific roadway segments, and treatment types may be adjusted based on field conditions, bid results, and available funding, while maintaining consistency with the overall intent of preserving and improving the City's roadway network.

Locations:

South College Drive: Main Street to Stowell
South Miller Street: Main Street to Stowell
Donovan Road: Suey Crossing to Carlotti
Donovan Road: College to Blosser
Taylor: Railroad to Blosser.

Southside Parkway: Bradley to College.

McCoy: Broadway to Miller
A Street: Fairway to Betteravia
Cost and Funding:

Preliminary Engineer's Estimate:

SB-1 (FY 26/27):
$ 3,359,223
$ 3,148,391

Attachment A
Gas Tax:

Estimated Start Date:

Estimated Completion Date:

Estimated Useful Life:
$ 210,832
September 2026
June 2027
10-15 years
SECTION 3. The Chief Deputy City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the Chief Deputy City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Santa Maria held this 5th day of May 2026.

ATTEST:

Chief Deputy City Clerk
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

Department Director
City Manager

Attachment B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide r
Estimated January 2026

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY

BUELLTON

CARPINTERIA
GOLETA

GUADALUPE
LOMPOC

SANTA BARBARA

SANTA MARIA

SOLVANG
County of Santa Barbara
2025-26
Hwy Users Tax
Account
Road Nhtnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
150,205
374,145
923,722
253,549
136,140 286,344
347,786 721,932
866,674 1,790,396
234,248 487,797
1,252,628 1,178,917 2,431,544
2,449,065 2,313,318 4,762,382
3,142,940 2,969,668 6,112,608
168,883
153,872 322,755
12,129,055 10,705,924 22,834,979
Total Oties & County: Santa Barbara 20,844,192 18,906,546 39,750,738

SANTA CLARA COUNTY

CAMPBELL

CUPERTINO
GILROY

LOS ALTOS

LOS ALTOS HILLS

LOS GATOS

MILPITAS

MONTE SERENO

MORGAN HILL

MOUNTAIN VIEW

PALO ALTO

SAN JOSE

SANTA CLARA

SARATOGA

SUNNYVALE
County of Santa Clara
Total Cities & County: Santa Clara
1,254,093 1,157,268 2,411,360
1,727,894 1,596,890 3,324,784
1,780,979 1,646,302 3,427,280
912,697
249,846
961,744 885,147 1,846,891
839,493 1,752,190
226,229 476,075
2,341,395 2,167,941 4,509,336
109,211
96,256 205,467
1,335,752 1,233,277 2,569,030
2,472,130 2,289,631 4,761,761
1,968,324 1,820,684 3,789,009
28,811,914 26,795,295 55,607,209
3,841,521 3,561,945 7,403,466
895,353
823,349 1,718,702
4,554,793 4,225,865 8,780,658
39,483,272
92,700,917
2026-27
Hwy Users Tax
Account
Road Nhtnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
152,868
380,950
940,679 918,833 1,859,511
258,132
144,333 297,201
368,717 749,667
248,346 506,478
1,275,693 1,249,867 2,525,560
2,494,324 2,452,540 4,946,864
3,201,041
3,148,391 6,349,433
171,893
163,132 335,026
12,363,098 11,350,236 23,713,334
21,238,679 20,044,395 41,283,074
1,277,165 1,226,915 2,504,080
1,759,731 1,692,995 3,452,727
1,813,801
1,745,381 3,559,182
929,434
254,356
979,391
890,016 1,819,450
239,844 494,200
938,417 1,917,808
2,384,617 2,298,414 4,683,031
111,130
102,049 213,179
1,360,340 1,307,499 2,667,839
2,517,778 2,427,427 4,945,205
2,004,623 1,930,258 3,934,881
29,346,130 28,407,911 57,754,041
3,912,535 3,776,313 7,688,848
911,768
872,901 1,784,668
4,639,044 4,480,189 9,119,233
33,048,319 72,531,591 40,216,946 35,037,260 75,254,206
82,413,891 175,114,808 94,418,789 87,373,791 181,792,580 January 2026
Ca(iforvtiaCityFivtavtce.cowt

Attachment C
CaliforniaCityFinance.com Updated January 15, 2026
The California Local Government Finance Almanac
Shared Revenue Estimates: State Revenue Allocations to Cities and Counties Local Streets and Roads Estimates: 2025-26, 2026-27
Including Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
The state of California imposes per -gallon excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, sales taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel and registration taxes on motor vehicles with allocations dedicated to transportation purposes.' The local (city and county) portions of these allocations flow through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA), the familiar gasoline tax revenues that have been in place for decades, and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which allocates much of the revenue from the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall).

State taxes transferred to and allocated through the state Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) include:
• The per gallon "gasoline tax" and "diesel fuel tax" imposed on the use of vehicle fuels. • The "use fuel tax," imposed on vendors and users of motor vehicle fuels that are not taxed under either the gasoline or diesel fuel tax, such as liquefied petroleum gas, ethanol, methanol and natural gas (both liquid and gaseous) for use on state highways. Use Fuel Tax rates vary depending on the type of fuel. • Variable rate per gallon gasoline diesel fuel excise taxes imposed in 2010-11 in a complicated arrangement known as the "fuel tax swap." This rate replaced the previous Proposition 42 sales tax on gasoline.

Transportation taxes allocated to cities and counties through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) include:
• An additional 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
• An additional 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017 with half of the revenues going to the state Trade Corridor Enhancement Account (TCEA) and half to the RMRA. Annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020. • An additional vehicle registration tax called the "Transportation Improvement Fee" with rates based on the value of the motor vehicle effective January 1, 2018 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2020.
• An additional $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emissions vehicles of model year 2020 or later effective July 1, 2020 with annual inflation adjustments beginning July 1, 2021.

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) also adopted annual inflationary adjustments beginning July 1, 2020 to all per -gallon motor vehicle fuel excise taxes including the rates allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA).

Taxes on aircraft jet fuel are transferred to the state Aeronautics Account. 2217 Isle Royale Lane • Davis, CA • 95616-6616 • Tel 530.758.3952

Attachment C

15 January 2026
Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)
Revenue Allocations — Streets & Highways Code Sec 2103-2108 "HUTA" Cities and counties receive revenue from the motor vehicle fuel taxes imposed pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7360(a) and (b) through the Highway User Tax Account under the following formulas outlined in the Streets and Highways code and illustrated in Figure 1.

Section 2104. Section 2104 allocates funds to counties with designated allotments for engineering and administration, snow removal, heavy rainfall / storm damage as well as county streets, roads and public mass transit guideways and facilities.

Section 2105. Section 2105(a) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among counties based on population.

Section 2105(b) allocates 11.5 percent of the tax revenues in excess of 9 cents per gallon (i.e. the Proposition 111 rate) monthly among cities based on population.

Section 2106. Revenues equal to 1.04 cents per gallon are allocated as follows:
a. $7.2 million per year to the State Bicycle Transportation Account. b. $400 per month to each city ($2,313,600 per year among the 482 eligible cities2) c. $800 per month to each county ($556,800 per year among the 58 counties) d. The residual amount to each county and the cities in that county based on registered vehicles. In each county, from this amount, the county receives an allotment based on the share of assessed value of the county which is in the unincorporated area. The remainder is allocated to the cities within the county based on population.

Streets & Highways Code Section 2106
Revenues equal to 1.04 cents per gallon
are allocated as follows:

Active
Transportation
Program
(State Highway
Account)
$T 2 million /year
tr&Hwys §2106(b)
Counties
$9,600.countyiyr
$556.800
Ir&Hwys §2106(b)
$4,800/cityiyr
=$2.3 million
Remainder by
ounty by number o
registered vehicles
Str&Hwys
*2106(c)(1
County share =
unincorporated AV
percent of total AV
Str&Hwys §2106(c)(2)
Remainder among
cities within each
county by population
Str&Hwys §2106(c)(3}
Cities
2 The city of Rolling Hills has only private streets and is therefor not eligible to receive these allocations.

CaliForniaCityFinanee.cowt

Attachment C

Section 2107. This section provides monthly allocations to cities of 1.315 cents per gallon of gasoline, 1.8 cents per gallon of diesel, and 2.59 cents per liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as follows. a. Each city with snow removal costs in excess of $5,000 is allocated 50 percent of the cost exceeding $5,000.
b. The remainder is allocated to cities based on population.

Section 2107.5. These funds (about $2.7 million per year) are allocated to cities annually in July based on population as follows:

Streets & Highway Code §2107.5
City Population Annual Allocation
over 500,000
100,000 to 500,000
50,000 to 99.999
25,000 to 49,999
20,000 to 24,999
15,000 to 19,999
10,000 to 14,999
5,000 to 9,999
less than 5,000
$ 20,000
$ 10,000
$ 7,500
$ 6,000
$ 5,000
$ 4,000
$ 3,000
$ 2,000
$ 1,000
Section 2107.5 funds must be used for engineering costs and administrative expenses related to city streets. Cities with populations under 10,000 may also expend the moneys for street construction or acquisition of street rights -of -way.

Section 2103 HUTA and the 2010 Gasoline Sales Tax — Excise Tax Swap In March 2010 as a part of a special budget session called by Governor Schwarzenegger, the Legislature enacted a swap of state sales taxes on gasoline for a gasoline excise tax. Intended to be "revenue neutral," the fuel tax swap provided the Legislature with greater flexibility in the use of funds, in particular relieving the general fund from the cost of state transportation debt service payments. The fuel tax swap:

1. Repealed the state sales tax on gasoline (local rates including the Bradley Burns are NOT affected);

2. Increased the excise tax on gasoline by 17.322 cents and added an annual adjustment mechanism intended to ensure the new excise tax provides, over time, the same amount of revenues expected from the sales tax on gas (no more, no less);

3. Increased the sales tax on diesel by 1.75 percent and allocated 75 percent to local transit agencies and 25 percent to state transit programs. The excise tax on diesel was reduced from 18 cents to 13.6 cents.

Sales tax revenues from diesel must go to transit funding.

4. Provided for a specific allocation of the funds among state and local transportation needs.

Revenues from the new Section 2103 excise tax rate are now allocated as follows:

1. State transportation debt service;

2. Remainder allocated:
a. 44 percent to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); b. 12 percent State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP); c. 44 percent evenly split between cities and counties using current HUTA formulas.

Section 2103 funds are allocated to cities on a per capita basis and to counties 75 percent based on the proportion of registered vehicles and 25 percent based on the proportion of maintained county road miles.

Cal iforniaCityFinance.covn

Attachment C

The law included expressed legislative intent to fully replace the local streets and road funds cities and counties would have received under Proposition 42 state sales tax on gasoline with allocations from the new higher motor vehicle excise tax (HUTA) rate.

However, the swap created certain revenue effects related to the timing and receipt of revenues. In particular, the law provided that the new excise tax rate be adjusted annually by the BOE to garner an amount of revenues equal to what Prop42 would have provided in the prior year. Thus, the annual Sec 2103 funds were always "looking backward." If the Section 2103 amounts generated less than Prop42 would have, the difference was made up until the following year.

In the years following the swap, there were a number of snafus and changes in interpretation of the Section 2103 allocation. In FY2011-12 SCO allocated more money to cities and counties and did not fully backfill state transportation programs for weight fees that were used for debt service and loans that those funds would have otherwise received. This was contrary to the Legislature's intention, but the statute was not clear. The statute was clarified in the 2013 budget to clarify the original intent of the weight fee swap to fully backfill state transportation funds. [Streets & Highways Code 2103 (a)(1)(D)].

Changes to HUTA Allocated Rates, Including the Variable Rate by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall)
In addition to increasing various fuel and motor vehicle registration taxes, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) removed BOE's discretionary rate setting role over the Section 2103 variable rate and reset the variable rate at 17.3 cents per gallon on July 1, 2019, up from the current 11.7 cents. This adjustment more than doubled Section 2103 revenue allocations for FY2019-20 over the prior year.

With regard to diesel fuel taxes, SB1 also eliminated the price -based adjustment mechanism applied to the diesel fuel tax rate.

Since 2020, gasoline and diesel fuel excise tax rates are increased on July 1 by the change in the California Consumer Price Index from the prior year. These include the 18 cent per gallon base rate, the 17.3 percent per gallon rate, the diesel fuel excise tax rate and vehicle registration taxes.

Streets & Highways Code Section 2103 Variable Gas Tax Allocations to Cities and Counties $900
0 S800
$700
$600
5500
S400
5300
S200
5100
So
i
1 I
i
i
i
FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 FY24-25 FY25-26eFY26-27e CaliForniaCityFinanee.cop

Attachment C

15 January 2026
California Gasoline Excise Tax Rates - Per Gallon
Effective Date
Base Rate
Sec2103
SB1 Rate
Total
July 1, 2015
$ 0.180
$ 0.120
$ 0.300
July 1, 2016
$ 0.180
$ 0.098
$ 0.278
July 1, 2017
$ 0.180
$ 0.117
$ 0.297
Nov 1,2017*
$0.180
$0.117
$0.120
$0.417
July 1, 2019
$ 0.180
$ 0.173
$ 0.120
$ 0.473
July 1, 2020
$ 0.192
$ 0.185
$ 0.128
$ 0.505
July 1, 2021
$ 0.194
$ 0.187
$ 0.130
$ 0.511
July 1, 2022
$ 0.205
$ 0.197
$ 0.137
$ 0.539
July 1, 2023
$ 0.220
$ 0.212
$ 0.147
$ 0.579
July 1, 2024
$ 0.227
$ 0.218
$ 0.151
$ 0.596
July 1, 2025
$ 0.233
$ 0.224
$ 0A55
$ 0.612
July 1, 2026e
$ 0.241
$ 0.232
$ 0.161
$ 0.634
Use of Funds: HUTA
California Diesel Excise Tax Rates
Effective Date
Base Rate SB1 Rate
Total
July 1, 2017
$ 0.160
$ 0.160
Nov 1, 2017*
$ 0.160
$ 0.200
$ 0.360
July 1, 2019
$ 0.160
$ 0.200
$ 0.360
July 1, 2020
$ 0.171
$ 0.214
$ 0.385
July 1, 2021
$ 0.173
$ 0.216
$ 0.389
July 1, 2022
$ 0.182
$ 0.228
$ 0.410
July 1, 2023
$ 0.196
$ 0.245
$ 0.441
July 1, 2024
$ 0.202
$ 0.252
$ 0.454
July 1, 2025
$ 0.207
$ 0.259
$ 0.466
July 1, 2026e
$ 0.214
$ 0.268
$ 0.482
The use of local Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds is restricted by Article XIX of the California State Constitution and by Streets and Highways Code Section 2101. All Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax funds allocated from the Highway Users Tax Account must be expended for the following:
(a) The research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways (and their related public facilities for nonmotorized traffic), including the mitigation of their environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes. (b) The research and planning for exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes.
(c) The construction and improvement of exclusive public mass transit guideways (and their related fixed facilities), including the mitigation of their environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for such purposes, the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the foregoing purposes, and the maintenance of the structures and the immediate right-of-way for the public mass transit guideways. (d) The payment of principal and interest on voter -approved bonds issued for the purposes specified above.

CaliForniaCity Finn nee.eowi

Attachment C

15 January 2026
Allocation of Gasoline Excise Tax Revenues
rates effecive July 1, 2025
Rev&Tax §7360(c)

11.65¢
§21O5
Rev&Tax §7360(a)

11.65¢
§2104, §2106,
§2107,§2108

61.2¢
Per Gal
Gasoline
Rev&Tax §7360(b)
Transportation
Debt Service
(State General
Highway Users Tax Acount

11.5% li1,(11)
Str&Hwys §2106
Str&Hwys §2105

51.2% Str&Hwys
2108
Str&Hwys §2105a

22.6% {')
Str&Hwys §2104
Str
y
§2105b

14.6% III
Str&Hwys §2107x.

Cities and
Counties
Counties (iv)
State
Highway
Account
Cities (v)
Wtees _$1 3billi©'n
Stf wm)is §21'33(x)(1)

22.4¢
§2103
Wt Fee Offset -$1.3 billion
Str&Hwys §2103(a)(1)
56%
Str&Hwys §2103(a)(3)(A-B)
22%
Str&Hwys §2103(a)(3)(C)
22%
Str&Hwys §2103(x)(3)(C)

15.5¢
§2036
Road 1
Maint. I
and
I Rehab. I
1 1 Account
_I
F
a)
(i)The 4.390 local share of diesel fuel tax is allocated 1.80 to counties and 2.59t to cities. (ii)Str&Hwy Code §2106 funds are distributed based on registered vehicles, assessed property valuation. and population.
(iii)A portion of funds in State Highway Account is allocated among counties and cities for Regional Transportation Improvement Programs.
(iv) County apportionments are based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage (v) City apportionments are based on population.
(vi) Beginning July 1. 2020 and annually thereafter, these rates are subject to an annual cost -of -living adjustment.

Cal iFo rn is C ity FivLance.cowl

Attachment C

15 January 2026
Three Year State General Fund TCRF Loan Repayment Funds SB1 stipulated the repayment of $706 million by the state General Fund to transportation funds over three fiscal years: 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. Under SB1, $75 million was allocated to local streets and roads from repayments of Transportation Congestion Relief Funds (TCRF) in each of these three years. These funds were allocated half to cities and half to counties with the city funds allocated among cities on a per capita basis, the county funds allocated among counties based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage.

These TCRF revenues may be deposited in local HUTA funds.' However, these TCRF funds carried slightly different use requirements than HUTA funds. TCRF funds could be expended only for street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction or storm damage repair. For these purposes, • "Maintenance" means patching and/or overlay and sealing. • "Reconstruction" includes any overlay, sealing or widening of the roadway, if the widening is necessary to bring the roadway width to the state minimum standards, but does not include widening for the purpose of traffic capacity.
• "Storm damage repair" is repair or reconstruction of local streets and highways and related drainage improvements that have been damaged due to winter storms and flooding, and construction of drainage improvements to mitigate future roadway flooding and damage problems, in those jurisdictions that have been declared disaster areas by the President of the United States.

Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
Revenue Allocations — Streets & Highways Code Sec 2031 "RMRA" The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) represented a significant additional investment in California's transportation systems of over $5 billion per year. The Act increased per gallon fuel excise taxes, diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration taxes, stabilized the problematic price -based fuel tax rates and provided for inflationary adjustments to rates in future years. The Act is more than doubling local streets and road funds allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which it established.

The RMRA receives funds"' from the following new taxes imposed under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017:
• A 12 cent per gallon increase to the gasoline excise tax effective November 1, 2017. • A 20 cent per gallon increase to the diesel fuel excise tax effective November 1, 2017, half of which will be allocated to Trade Corridors Enhancement Account (TCEA) with the remaining half to the RMRA. • A new vehicle registration tax called the "transportation improvement fee," effective January 1, 2018, based on the market value of the vehicle.
• An additional new $100 vehicle registration tax on zero emission vehicles model year 2020 and later effective July 1, 2020.
3 Note that the "loan repayment" is between the state general fund and state transportation funds. From an accounting standpoint this is NOT a debt repayment to local agencies, it is simply revenue. 4 In addition, funds from a 4 percent increase in the diesel sales tax to 5.75 percent from the prior 1.75 percent effective November 1, 2017 are allocated to the Public Transportation Account.

Cal iforniaCityFinance.covn

Attachment C

15 January 2026
• Annual rate increases to these taxes every July 1 (January 1 for the registration fees) for the change in the California Consumer Price Index. The first adjustment made on July 1, 2020 covered CPI change for two years: November 1, 2017 through November 12, 2019.

SB1 Transportation Improvement Fee
Vehicle Value
Jan 2018
Jan 2020
Jan 2021
Jan 2022 Jan 2023
Jan 2024
Jan 2025
Jan 2026
0 - $4,999
$ 25
$ 27
$ 27
$ 28
$ 29
$ 32
$ 32
$ 33
$5,000 - $24,999
$ 52
$ 54
$ 55
$ 56
$ 59
$ 65
$ 65
$ 66
$25,000 - $34,999
$ 105
$ 107
$ 110
$ 112
$ 118
$ 129
$ 129
$ 132
$35,000 - $59,999
$ 157
$ 161
$ 165
$ 168
$ 177
$ 194
$ 194
$ 198
$60,000 & over
$ 183
$ 188
$ 192
$ 196
$ 206
$ 227
$ 227
$ 231
SB1 Road Improvement Fee (RIF)
Jan 2020 Jan 2021 Jan 2022 Jan 2023 Jan 2024 Jan 2025 Jan 2026 $ 100 $ 101 $ 103 $ 108 $ 118 $ 118 $ 121
ZEV vehicle"
*Zero Emission Vehicles, 2020 or later models.

Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Account Revenues
50%
50%
Trade
Corridor
Enhancement
Account
(TCEA)
Transportation
Improvement Fee*
Zero Emission
Vehicle Fee**
remainder
Road
Maintenance
& Rehabilitation
Account
(RMRA)
$350 m/yr
transit
250 m/yr
congested
corridors
State
Highway
Account
Diesel Sales T-
+4.00% to 5.7
Public
Transportation
Account
* adjusted for inflation annually beginning 7/1/2020
** effective 7/1/2020 adjusted for inflation annually beginning 7/1/2021 Ca1 iforniaCityFinance.cowt

Attachment C

The Road Repair and Accountability Act directs the State Controller to allocate, on a monthly basis, fifty percent of the revenues in the RMRA to the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOP) in the State Highway Account and half to cities and counties. But there are a series of specific program allocations, subject to appropriation in the annual state budget, to be taken out first:

1. Administrative costs.

2. $200 million for the State -Local -Partnership Program for existing and aspiring self-help jurisdictions.

3. $100 million annually for the Active Transportation Program for the purpose of encouraging increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking.

4. $400 million for state bridge and culvert maintenance and rehabilitation.

5. $25 million for the state's Freeway Service Patrol program.

6. $5 million for five years through FY 2021-22 for pre -apprenticeship training programs of the California Workforce Development Board.

7. $25 million for local planning grants to encourage local and regional planning.

8. $7 million for transportation research and transportation -related workforce education, training, and development including $5 million to the University of California and $2 million to the California State University.

Allocation of Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Account Revenues
Administrative
Costs
Active Transp.

Program
Freeway Service
Patrol
rer State Budget
Str&Hwys §2031 5
$100 million
Str&Hwys §2032(b)
$200 million
Str&Hwys §2032(a)
Local Planning
Grants
State spending
el Local spending
$25 million
Str&Hwys §2032(d)
$400 million
Str&Hwys §2032(c)
Local Partnership
Self -Help Counties
Bridges and
Culverts
$25 million
Str&Hwys §2032(f)
State
Highway
Account
$5 million
Str&Hwys §2032(e)
$7 million )11
Str&Hwys §2032(g)
Remasnder to .. I
Str&Hwys §2032(h)
Counties Ill
Workforce
Development
Transportation
Research DC / CSU
Cities III)
(i)County apportionments are based on numbers of registered vehicles and county road mileage. (ii) City apportionments are based on population
CaliForniaCity Finn nee.covn

Attachment C

Use of Funds: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Section 2030] The use of RMRA local streets and roads funds is similar but, not identical, to HUTA use rules. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2030, RMRA local streets and roads allocations must be used for projects "that include, but are not limited to," the following
• Road maintenance and rehabilitation
• Safety projects
• Railroad grade separations
• Traffic control devices
• Complete street components, "including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm -water capture projects in conjunction with any other allowable project."
RMRA funds may also be used to satisfy a match requirement for projects eligible for state or federal funds.

SB1 also contains non -obligatory intent language regarding the use of funds. "To the extent possible and cost effective," cities and counties are to use a use:
• advanced recycling techniques that reduce greenhouse gas emissions; • automotive technologies, ZEV fueling, infrastructure -to -vehicle; • communications autonomous vehicle systems;
• resiliency re climate change, fires, floods, sea level rise; and • complete street elements, access for bicycles, pedestrians.

If a city or county has an average Pavement Condition Index that meets or exceeds 80, the city or county may spend its RMRA funds on transportation priorities other than these. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2037] Maintenance of Effort: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2036] The Road Repair and Accountability Act contains a local agency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds allocated through the RMRA. The Act states that the MOE requirement is to ensure that these new roads funds do not supplant existing levels of city and county general revenue spending on streets and roads. The MOE for the receipt of RMRA funds state that a city or county must maintain general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than average of 2009-10,2010-11, and 2011-12 years. In making this calculation an agency may exclude one-time funds. A city or county that fails to comply in a particular year may make it up with in additional expenditures in the following year.

The Act provides that the State Controller may perform audits to ensure compliance with these MOE rules. If the State Controller determines that a city or county has not met its MOE, the agency will be required to reimburse the state for the funds it received during that fiscal year. However, a city or county that fails to comply in a particular fiscal year may expend during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is sufficient to comply. Any funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply will be reapportioned to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in compliance.

For further guidance, see the State Controller's "Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties."
Cal iforniaCityFinance.com

Attachment C

Spending Plans and Reports: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034] The Road Repair and Accountability Act stipulates that, prior to receiving RMRA funds in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a project list pursuant to an adopted budget. The list must include for each project: description, location, schedule, useful life. [Streets and Highways Code Sec 2034(a)]
The Road Repair and Accountability Act also requires that a city or county submit to the CTC an annual report of project completion in order to receive RMRA funds. The report must include descriptions of all projects for which RMRA funds were expended including: description, location, funds expended, completion date, estimated useful life of the project.

Budgeting and Accounting for RMRA Funds: The -60 Day Delay The allocation of Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues to cities and counties takes many weeks. It takes the State Controller's Office roughly 30 to 60 days from the time of revenue collection by the state, through the various statutory set asides to distribute the funds to cities and counties in monthly allocations. Consequently, the estimates shown in this report are for revenues collected for July through June are not received on a cash basis by local agencies until September through August. That is, for example, the FY2022-23 figure for your agency is revenues collected in and for July 2022 through June 2023 but distributed in monthly allocations September 2022 through August 2023. Cities and counties thus have two choices in the budgeting and accounting of RMRA revenues:
1) apply a 60 day accrual policy to RMRA funds (recommended); or 2) adjust RMRA budgets (especially in FY2017-18) to reflect a distributed cash basis.

Local Streets and Roads (HUTA and RMRA) Revenue Estimates for FY2025-26 and FY2026-27
We have computed revenue estimates for each city and county using a model reflecting the local allocation formulas, latest population figures used by the State Controller for allocations and estimates by the state Department of Finance (DOF) of statewide HUTA and RMRA tax revenues provided with the Governor's Proposed 2026-27 Budget (released January 10, 2025) and analyses of SB1(Beall), The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. Compared to their May 2025 projections for 2025-26, DOF statewide revenue estimates show a slight (1.6 percent) downward revision in their RMRA estimate and a slight (1.8 percent) upward revision in HUTA estimate for a very slight 0.2 percent overall higher LSR estimate for this year.

Fuel consumption was sharply down during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic but has largely recovered to its prior, slightly declining trajectory. Recently, fuel prices have increased steeply but the price of fuel no longer has a direct effect on local streets and roads revenues because all rates are per gallon, regardless of price.

Despite lower fuel consumption, scheduled rate increases stipulated in SB1 have kept local allocations of revenue growing at a modest pace but this growth is expected to flatten in a few years. Gas tax revenue collections are forecast to increase 2 percent in 2025-26 and again in 2026-27 but to to zero growth by FY 2030-31.

On the other hand, vehicle registration tax revenues from the SB1 vehicle registration tax ("Transportation Improvement Fee") and the zero emission vehicle registration tax ("Road Improvement Fee") are forecast to increase by about 6 percent in 2025-26 and again in 2026-27 and sustain this pace of growth over the five year forecast period.

Cal iforniaCityFinance.com

Attachment C

Millions of gallons
Total LSR allocations (including HUTA, TCRF, and RMRA) were up 8.1 percent in 2024-25 from the prior year.

But as fuel consumption gradually declines, revenue growth will soften. The Department of Finance projects total LSR allocations to cities and counties in 2025-26 will increase by just 1.9 percent. For the budget year FY2026-27, DOF estimates total statewide local streets and roads allocations will grow by 6.0 percent.

HUTA (Highway Users Tax Account)
HUTA revenues are allocated to cities and counties pursuant to Sections 2103-2107 of the Streets and Highways Code. The per gallon excise tax rates that provide HUTA revenues are adjusted annually on July 1 as described above. Revenue changes depend on the combined effects of 1) these rate adjustments, 2) taxable gallonage, and 3) the relative change of statutory transfers including the "weight fee offset" that pays state transportation bond debt.

Sec2103-2108 HUTA allocations (not including RMRA) grew 2.6 percent in FY2024-25. But HUTA revenue growth is now flattening and will continue to decline. DOF estimates 1.4 percent HUTA growth in current year FY2025-26, leveling off to 1.8 percent growth in budget year FY2026-27.

Gasoline
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
Diesel
+4.2% +d.8% -3.9% 0.6%
-3.0% -1.1% 2.8% °
-1.6% -1.9r °
-8.7% +6.6% -2.4% -0.8% -1.2% ° -1.6% ° -6.8% 0.6/° 2.3/0 2.2°/° 2J% 2017.18 2018-19 2019.20 2020-21 2021-22 2022.23 2023.24 2024-25 202526 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030.31 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual »>»»> >>>>>>» »>»>» >»»>» »»»» »»»» 3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
RMRA (Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account)5
The Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB1) taxes that provide funding to cities and counties through the RMRA began on November 1, 2017 when the new per -gallon fuel excise taxes took effect. It also includes allocations from the SB1 vehicle registration tax ("Transportation Improvement Fee") and the zero emission vehicle registration tax ("Road Improvement Fee") which are expected to grow more robustly and are not included in the HUTA allocations. Additionally, various fixed -amount statutory allocations are made from the SB1 tax rates prior to the city and county allocations. 5 Note that RMRA revenues are delayed 60 days from collection to allocation. That is, the revenues for a July 1 to June 30 fiscal year are allocated September 1 through August 31. These are spendable in the fiscal year because your accounting staff "accrues" them back into your fiscal year.

CaliForniaCityFinn nee.covn
Millions of gallons

Attachment C

Because of this, city and county RMRA revenues are expected to grow more robustly. DOF estimates 2025-26 revenue will be 1.9 percent higher than 2024-25 actuals and that 2026-27 revenues will grow by 6.0 percent over the current year.

California Local Streets and Roads Program - State Funds to Cities and Counties 4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
2 500 —
TCRF Ioan
repayment
R.M.R.A.

H.U.T.A.
2103
cities,
countie
§2104
—counties
2105
cities,
_counties
§2106
§2107
FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 FY24-25 FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28 FY28-29 FY28-30 FY30-31 cities estim. projected >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>»»
Looking Ahead: Long Term Estimates of Local Streets and Roads Funding Since the recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, we have seen modest year over year growth in local streets and roads revenues. In future years, as alternative fuel vehicles come more into use, fuel consumption will continue to decline. The SB1 annual cost of living adjustments will help to maintain revenues but we will see decline in revenue growth to below the rate of inflation.

Due to complicated statutory transfers from these revenues before the city and county allocations are made (including the $1.35 billion transfer for state transportation debt service), actual growth in funding allocated to cities and counties varies somewhat among the various categories of local streets and roads allocations and will not exactly mirror total tax collections. Taking all these factors into account, for the purposes of long-term transportation program planning, we estimate transportation allocations to cities and counties will increase in outyears at the following growth rates:

Estimated Annual Revenue Growth Rate over prior year
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
HUTA 2103 1.6% 2.0% -0.9`)/0 -0.2% -1.6°/0 -1.2%
HUTA 2104 3.5% 1.7% 1.0% 1.0% 0.5% 0.1%
HUTA 2105 0.8% 1.7% 1.0% 1.0% 0.5% 0.1%
HUTA 2106 1.4% 1.7% 1.0% 1.0% 0.5% 0.1%
HUTA 2107 -1.1% 1.7% 1.0% 1.0% 0.5% 0.1%
RMRA 1.9% 6.0% 4.7% 4.9% 5.3% 5.2%
CaliForniaCity Finn nee.eowt

Attachment C

Your Mileage Revenues May Vary
Long-term, in addition to the growth in statewide local streets and roads revenue collections, the allocations to each particular city will be primarily related to changes in the city's population relative to the change in state population in cities. The current forecast for California population, provided by the Demographics Unit of the California Department of Finance is as follows:6
California 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Population 39,185,605 38,990,487 38,991,721 39,024,054 39,068,081 39,131,779 39,213,804 39,323,647 39,430,871 39,532,028 in Cities 32,713,003 33,118,970 33,120,018 r33,182,48f 33,219,919 33,274,082 33,343,828 33,437,229 33,528,402 33,614,417 percent change 1.24% 0.00% 0.19% 0.11% 0.16% 0.21% 0.28% 0.27% 0.26% 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040
Population 39,626,155 39,719,558 39,800,683 39,872,787 39,936,372 39,991,277 40,037,385 40,076,005 40,106,449 Population in Cities 33,694,454 33,773,875 33,842,856 33,904,167 33,958,234 34,004,920 34,044,126 34,076,965 34,102,852 percent change 0.24% 0.24% 0.20% 0.18% 0.16% 0.14% 0.12% 0.10% 0.08% If you think your city's population growth will be significantly different from the statewide average in cities, then you should adjust accordingly. For example, the City of Buenavida's planning department estimates the city will see average annual residential population growth of 1.5 percent annually over the next ten years. The city's estimated HUTA 2105 allocation for FY2026-27 is $381,200. The long term projection of Section 2105 revenue would be:
$381,200 x Sec2105 growth x Buenavida Population Growth - Statewide City Population Growth So, for 2027-28, the city would estimate $381,200 x 1.01 x 1.015 = 1.0016 = $390,185 And long term ...

City of Buenavida EXAMPLE
2027-28
2028-29
2029-30
2030-31
2026-27
2031-32
2032-33
HUTA Sec2015 $ 381,200
2105 growth

1.0%

1.0%

0.5%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%
Buenavida pop

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%

1.5%
Cities pop

0.16%

0.21%

0.28%

0.27%

0.26%

0.24%
HUTA Sec2015
$ 390,185
$ 399,277
$ 406,122
$ 411,349
$ 416,436
$ 421,671
Changes for in allocations to an individual county will be affected by many things including: the population of the county relative to the total population of the state, proportion of population in the unincorporated area of the county, as well as relative numbers of vehicle registrations, assessed values and maintained road miles.

Next Update
The next update to these revenue estimates will be in May 2026. mjgc
6 See http://wwwdof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/projections/_California population in cities estimated by author based on recent historic trend of proportion of population in cities.

Cal iforniaCityFinance.covn

Attachment C

ATTACHMENTS:

A) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues — FY2025-26 B) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual City Revenues — FY2026-27 C) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues — FY2025-26 (from CSAC) D) Local Streets and Roads - Projected Individual County Revenues — FY2026-27 (from CSAC) Cal iforniaCityFinance.covn

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026 Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11) Streets & Highways Code

ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA
ALBANY

BERKELEY
DUBLIN

EMERYVILLE

FREMONT

HAYWARD

LIVERMORE
NEWARK

OAKLAND

PIEDMONT

PLEASANTON

SAN LEANDRO

UNION CITY

ALPI NE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
Sec2103 (3)
Sec2105 (3)
Sec2106 (3)
Sec2107 (3)
Sec2107.5 (4)
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
757,271
202,888
1,229,995
715,785
129,096
2,229,253
1,571,936
841,057
468,488
4,150, 979
107,984
507,732
136,031
824,682
479,917
86,556
1,494,661
1,053,945
563,909
314,110
2,783,131
72,401
286,688
80,323
462,656
271,245
52,855
834,622
589,941
317,877
179,191
1,549,969
44,996
678,585
181,806
1,102,189
641,409
115,682
1,997,616
1,408,600
753,665
419,809
3,719,660
96,764
7,500
5,000
10,000
7,500
3,000
10,000
10,000
7,500
6,000
10,000
3,000
2,237,775
606,048
3,629,522
2,115, 856
387,190
6,566,152
4,634,421
2,484,008
1,387,598
12,213,739
325,146
2,091,323
560,306
3,396,825
1,976,753
356,520
6,156,435
4,341,149
2,322,713
1,293,804
11,463,584
298,216
4,329,098
1,166, 355
7,026,347
4,092,609
743,710
12,722,587
8,975,571
4,806,721
2,681,402
23,677,323
623,362
764,784
871,350
671,711
512,769
584,219
450,366
289,485
329,153
254,839
685,317
780,810
601,915
7,500
7,500
7,500
2,259,855 2,112,072
2,573,033 2,406,371
1,986,332 1,855,037
4,371,928
4,979,404
3,841,369
AMADOR
IONE

JACKSON

PLYMOUTH

SUTTER CREEK

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS
CHICO

GRIDLEY

OROVILLE

PARADISE
1,917
86,604
48,213
10,752
25,338
1,285
58,066
32,326
7,209
16,989
5,736
47,094
28,345
10,051
17,174
1,718
77,605
43,204
9,635
22,705
1,000
2,000
2,000
1,000
1,000
11,655
271,369
154,088
38,648
83,206
5,293
239,171
133,149
29,695
69,975
16,948
510,540
287,238
68,342
153,182
18,908
1,091,028
12,677
731,508
12,324
438,982
16,943
1,000
977,662 10,000
61,853 52,217
3,249,179 3,013,045
114,070
6,262,225
70,207
47,072
32,739
81,109
47,087
62,912
2,000
4,000
3,000
214,931
577,253
327,866
193,888
529,553
293,452
408,819

CALAVERAS COUNTY

ANGELS CAMP

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA

WILLIAMS
191,752
106,259
128,565
71,244
171,827
100,275
1,106, 806
621,318
34,998
23,465
30,112
31,362
1,000
120,937
96,653
217,590
62,636
53,561
41,996
35,911
21,629
19,191
56,128
47,996
2,000
2,000
184,389
158,659
172,980
147,917
357,370
306,576
15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

ANTIOCH

BRENTWOOD

C LAYTO N

CONCORD

DANVILLE

EL CERRITO

HERCULES

LAFAYETTE

MARTINEZ
MORAGA
OAKLEY
ORINDA
PINOLE

PITTSBURG

PLEASANT HILL

RICHMOND

SAN PABLO

SAN RAMON

WALNUT CREEK

CRESCENT CITY
P _

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
1,119,145 750,360 449,674 1,002,857 10,000 3,332,036 3,090,696 6,422,732 630,072 422,448 255,261 564,603 7,500 1,879,884 1,740,043 3,619,927 106,029 71,090 46,948 95,012 3,000 322,080 292,817 614,897 1,202,893 806,511 482,965 1,077,903 10,000 3,580,273 3,321,980 6,902,253 418,473 280,576 171,148 374,991 6,000 1,251,188 1,155,680 2,406,868 248,964 166,924 103,766 223,095 6,000 748,750 687,554 1,436,303 251,322 168,505 104,703 225,207 6,000 755,737 694,064 1,449,801 243,655 163,365 101,656 218,337 6,000 733,013 672,892 1,405,904 359,747 241,202 147,804 322,366 6,000 1,077,118 993,498 2,070,616 165,820 111,178 70,715 148,590 4,000 500,302 457,937 958,239 448,747 300,874 183,182 402,118 6,000 1,340,921 1,239,285 2,580,206

EL NORTE COUNTY
187,075 125,429 79,165 167,637 4,000 563,306 516,638 1,079,944 181,459 121,664 76,932 162,604 4,000 546,660 501,129 1,047,789 731,913 490,730 295,745 655,862 7,500 2,181,751 2,021,295 4,203,045 330,738 221,752 136,273 296,372 6,000 991,135 913,386 1,904,520 1,110,702 744,699 446,318 995,292 10,000 3,307,011 3,067,380 6,374,391 308,630 206,929 127,484 276,561 6,000 925,603 852,329 1,777,932 810,736 543,579 327,078 726,494 7,500 2,415,387 2,238,975 4,654,362 673,762 451,741 272,629 603,753 7,500 2,009,385 1,860,701 3,870,086

L DORADO COUNTY

LACERVILLE
64,515 43,256
25,093 57,811
2,000 192,674
178,167 370,842
103,691 69,522 71,964 93,324 3,000 341,501 286,359 627,860 205,312 137,657 137,787 1,713,982 5,000 2,199,738 567,002 2,766,740 15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS

COALINGA

FIREBAUGH
FOWLER
FRESNO
HURON
KERMAN

KINGSBURG

MENDOTA

ORANGE COVE

PARLIER

REEDLEY
SANGER

SAN JOAQUIN
SELMA
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
1,237,403 829,649 423,167 1,108,827 10,000 3,609,046 3,417,283 7,026,329 172,863 115,901 63,245 154,901 4,000 510,910 477,389 988,300 83,509 55,991 33,034 74,832 2,000 249,365 230,622 479,988 73,475 49,263 29,642 65,840 2,000 220,221 202,913 423,133 5,338,194 3,579,131 1,809,649 4,783,514 20,000 15,530,488 14,742,266 30,272,754 66,431 44,541 27,260 59,529 2,000 199,761 183,461 383,221 168,043 112,669 61,615 150,582 4,000 496,909 464,077 960,986 127,314 85,361 47,845 114,085 3,000 377,605 351,597 729,202 121,804 81,666 45,982 109,147 3,000 361,599 336,380 697,978 93,121 62,435 36,284 83,445 2,000 277,285 257,168 534,453 140,385 94,125 52,264 125,798 3,000 415,573 387,697 803,270 254,944 170,934 90,997 228,453 6,000 751,328 704,068 1,455,396 259,103 173,722 92,403 232,180 6,000 763,409 715,554 1,478,963 35,439 23,761 16,782 31,757 1,000 108,738 97,870 206,609 236,832 158,790 84,873 212,223 5,000 697,718 654,048 1,351,765 ]GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND
WILLOWS _
'HUMBOLDT COUNTY
AR ATA

BLUE LAKE
EUREKA

FERNDALE

FORTUNA

RIO DELL

TRINIDAD
1 _
83,413
62,052 41,604
55,926 31,287
74,746 2,000 247,372 230,358 477,730
24,504 55,604 2,000 185,764
171,366 357,130

IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY

CALEXICO

CALIPATRIA

EL CE VTRO

HOLTVILLE

IMPERIAL
182,092 122,088 82,526 163,171 4,000 553,877 502,876 1,056,753 11,548 7,743 9,729 10,348 1,000 40,368 31,891 72,259
258,480 173,305 115,132 231,622 6,000 784,539 713,834 1,498,373 13,359 8,957 10,502 11,971 1,000 45,789 36,893 82,683
120,079 80,510 56,055 107,601 3,000 367,245 331,616 698,861 32,487 21,782 18,667 29,112 1,000 103,048 89,719 192,767 2,942 1,973 6,056 2,636 1,000 14,607 8,125 22,732
277,455 186,027 114,209 248,625 6,000 832,316 766,236 1,598,552 384,031 257,483 156,234 344,127 6,000 1,147,876 1,060,562 2,208,437 62,617 41,983 29,492 56,111 2,000 192,203 172,927 365,130 440,898 295,611 178,659 395,085 6,000 1,316,254 1,217,609 2,533,863 54,481 36,528 26,283 48,820 2,000 168,112 150,458 318,570 219,131 146,922 91,210 196,362 5,000 658,625 605,166 1,263,791

WESTMORLAND

I NYO COUNTY
BISHOP
19,972 13,390
12,675 17,896
1,000 64,934
55,155 120,088
36,944 24,770
20,566 33,105
1,000 116,384
102,025 218,410
15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN

BAKERSFIELD

CALIFORNIA CITY
DELANO

MARICOPA

MCFARLAND

RIDGECREST

SHAFTER
TAFT

TEHACHAPI
WASCO

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL

CORCORAN

HANFORD

LEMOORE

LAKE COUNTY
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3)
Sec2105 (3)
Sec2106 (3)
Sec2107 (3)
Sec2107.5 (4)
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
191,579 128,449 57,506 171,673 4,000 553,208 529,077 1,082,284 4,017,676 2,693,755 1,110,116 3,600,208 10,000 11,431,754 11,095,445 22,527,199 143,922 96,496 44,395 128,967 4,000 417,780 397,463 815,242 506,294 339,458 144,088 453,686 7,500 1,451,027 1,398,212 2,849,239 9,832 6,592 7,505 8,811 1,000 33,741 27,154 60,895
136,207 91,324 42,272 122,054 3,000 394,857 376,158 771,015 272,031 182,390 79,639 243,765 6,000 783,825 751,257 1,535,082 224,776 150,707 66,639 201,420 5,000 648,541 620,754 1,269,295 82,138 55,072 27,397 73,603 2,000 240,211 226,838 467,049 124,976 83,793 39,182 111,990 3,000 362,941 345,140 708,081 259,831 174,211 76,283 232,833 6,000 749,158 717,566 1,466,724

CLEARLAKE

LAKEPORT

LASSEN COUNTY

SUSANVILLE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS

ALHAMBRA

ARCADIA

ARTESIA
AVALON
AZUSA

BALDWIN PARK
BELL
BE__=LOWER

BELL GARDENS

BEVERLY -ILLS

BRADBURY

BURBANK

CALABASAS
CARSON

CERRITOS

CLAREMONT

COMMERCE

COMPTON
131,233 87,989 43,129 117,597 3,000 382,948 362,422 745,370 207,248 138,955 65,330 185,713 5,000 602,246 572,348 1,174,594 586,861 393,476 176,201 525,882 7,500 1,689,920 1,620,709 3,310,629 265,380 177,931 82,308 237,805 6,000 769,424 732,889 1,502,314 161,670 108,396 62,127 144,871 4,000 481,064 446,477 927,541 48,166 32,294 21,879 43,161 2,000 147,499 133,017 280,516 155,565 104,303
50,014 173,901
4,000 487,784
429,618 917,402
193,889 129,998 77,816 173,742 5,000 580,446 535,455 1,115,900 791,780 530,870 302,976 709,508 7,500 2,342,634 2,186,626 4,529,260 545,068 365,455 210,067 488,431 7,500 1,616,521 1,505,292 3,121,814 157,137 105,357 63,976 140,809 4,000 471,279 433,959 905,238 32,995 22,123 17,226 29,567 1,000 102,910 91,122 194,032 481,550 322,868 186,146 431,513 7,500 1,429,578 1,329,877 2,759,455 690,341 462,857 264,775 618,609 7,500 2,044,083 1,906,486 3,950,569 327,116 219,323 127,988 293,126 6,000 973,553 903,382 1,876,935 755,699 506,678 289,388 677,176 7,500 2,236,441 2,086,983 4,323,424 378,453 253,744 147,321 339,129 6,000 1,124,648 1,045,159 2,169,806 313,364 210,103 122,809 280,803 6,000 933,079 865,403 1,798,482 8,817 5,911 8,120 7,901 1,000 31,749 24,348 56,097
1,027,050 688,612 391,575 920,331 10,000 3,037,569 2,836,360 5,873,929 222,572 149,229 88,618 199,445 5,000 664,863 614,667 1,279,530 899,056 602,795 343,374 805,637 7,500 2,658,361 2,482,884 5,141,245 473,040 317,162 182,942 423,888 6,000 1,403,032 1,306,376 2,709,407 367,365 246,310 143,146 329,193 6,000 1,092,014 1,014,538 2,106,552 118,593 79,514 49,461 106,270 3,000 356,838 327,514 684,352 920,867 617,419 351,588 825,182 7,500 2,722,556 2,543,120 5,265,676 15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

away lxai adi i

Attache n rit C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3)
Sec2105 (3)
Sec2106 (3)
Sec2107 (3)
Sec2107.5 (4)
COVINA
CUDAHY

CULVER CITY

DIAMOND BAR
DOWNEY
DUARTE

EL MONTE

EL SEGUNDO

GARDENA

GLENDALE

GLENDORA

HAWAIIAN GARDENS

HAWTHORNE

HERMOSA BEACH

HIDDEN HILLS

HUNTINGTON PARK

INDUSTRY

INGLEWOOD

IRWINDALE

LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE

LA HABRA HEIGHTS

LAKEWOOD

LA MIRADA

AN CASTE R

LA PUENTE

LA VERVE

LAWN DALE

LO M ITA

LONG BEACH

LOS ANGELES

LYN WOOD
MALIBU
MAV1ATTA\ BEAD-

MAYWOOD

MONROVIA

MONTEBELLO

MONTEREY PARK
NORWA_K

PALMDALE

HALOS VERDES ESTATES

DARAMOUN

PASADENA

PICO RIVERA
491,622
218,240
387,500
526,649
1,091,708
227,565
1,045,996
165,915
583,670
1,877,346
503,161
133,648
843,242
188,886
16,732
524,340
4,130
1,039,891
14,461
196,850
54,184
788,637
472,542
1,703,601
364,241
310,786
304,538
200,588
4,449,364
37,360,766
656,953
102,886
339,842
240,809
372,981
601,178
585,414
991,045
1,622,267
127,956
512,389
1,347,706
595,428
329,621
146,325
259,809
353,106
731,964
152,577
701,315
111,242
391,336
1,258,715
337,357
89,608
565,374
126,644
11,219
351,557
2,769
697,222
9,696
131,983
36,329
528,762
316,828
1,142, 223
244,215
208,374
204,185
134,489
2,983,191
25,049,494
440,471
68,983
227,856
161,456
250,075
403,076
392,506
664,472
1,087,691
85,791
343,545
903,605
399,220
189,939
86,987
150,728
203,130
415,925
90,498
398,710
67,282
224,603
711,787
194,285
55,131
322,356
75,933
11,101
202,260
6,355
396,411
10,246
78,932
25,205
301,792
182,754
646,357
141,969
121,838
119,485
80,339
1,680,381
14,074,445
252,201
43,546
132,781
95,486
145,261
231,197
225,260
378,017
615,728
52,987
197,760
512,331
229,032
440,539
195,563
347,236
471,926
978,271
203,919
937,309
148,675
523,022
1,682,275
450,878
119,761
755,623
169,260
14,994
469,857
3,701
931,839
12,959
176,396
48,554
706,691
423,441
1,526,583
326,394
278,493
272,894
179,745
3,987,040
33,478,692
588,691
92,195
304,530
215,787
334,226
538,711
524,585
888,068
1,453,701
114,660
459,148
1,207,669
533,559
7,500
5,000
6,000
7,500
10,000
5,000
10,000
4,000
7,500
10,000
7,500
3,000
7,500
4,000
1,000
7,500
1,000
10,000
1,000
5,000
2,000
7,500
6,000
10,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
5,000
10,000
20,000
7,500
3,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
7,500
7,500
10,000
10,000
3,000
7,500
10,000
7,500
TOTAL
HUTA
1,459,222
652,115
1,151,273
1,562,311
3,227,869
679,558
3,093,330
497,115
1,730,132
5,540,123
1,493,181
401,148
2,494,095
564,723
55,046
1,555,514
17,956
3,075,364
48,361
589,161
166,272
2,333,382
1,401,565
5,028,764
1,082,819
925,491
907,102
600,161
13,109,977
109,983,397
1,945,816
310,610
1,011,009
719,538
1,108,542
1,781,662
1,735,265
2,931,602
4,789,387
384,394
1,520,342
3,981,311
1,764,739
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
1,357,693
602,704
1,070,142
1,454,425
3,014,925
628,456
2,888,683
458,201
1,611,896
5,184, 586
1,389,557
369,091
2,328,747
521,640
46,209
1,448,047
11,407
2,871,824
39,937
543,633
149,637
2,177,945
1,304,999
4,704,762
1,005,910
858,284
841,028
553,954
12,287,621
103,177,654
1,814,280
284,136
938,528
665,031
1,030,047
1,660,249
1,616,713
2,736,928
4,480,148
353,371
1,415, 044
3,721,904
1,644,370
TOTAL
2,816,914
1,254,819
2,221,416
3,016,736
6,242,793
1,308,014
5,982,013
955,316
3,342,028
10,724,709
2,882,738
770,240
4,822,842
1,086,362
101,255
3,003,561
29,363
5,947,188
88,298
1,132, 794
315,909
4,511,328
2,706,565
9,733,526
2,088,729
1,783,775
1,748,130
1,154,115
25,397,598
213,161,050
3,760,096
594,746
1,949,537
1,384,569
2,138, 589
3,441,911
3,351,978
5,668,531
9,269,535
737,765
2,935,386
7,703,215
3,409,109
15 January 2026 CaliforvuaCityF,rarce.cowt Page 5 of 16

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)(') Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3)
Sec2105 (3)
Sec2106 (3)
Sec2107 (3)
Sec2107.5 (4)
POMONA

RANCHO PALOS VERDES

REDONDO BEACH

ROLLING HILLS

ROLLING HILLS ESTATES

ROSEMEAD

SAN DIMAS

SAN FERNANDO

SAN GABRIEL

SAN MARINO

SANTA CLARITA

SANTA FE SPRINGS

SANTA MONICA

SIERRA MADRE
SIG\AL HILL

SOUTH EL MONTE

SOUTH GATE

SOUTH PASADENA

TEM'LE CITY

TORRANCE
VERNON
WALNUT

WEST COVINA

WEST HOLLYWOOD

WESTLAKE VILLAGE

W-ITTIER
1,466,644
404,501
672,948
983,350
271,208
451,195
557,122
157,130
258,225
1,314,249
362,470
603,023
10,000
6,000
7,500
TOTAL
HUTA
4,331,365
1,201,309
1,992,890
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
4,050,370
1,117, 093
1,858,451
TOTAL
8,381,735
2,318,402
3,851,341
81,889 54,905 35,639 73,380 2,000 247,813 226,150 473,962 489,600 328,265 189,178 438,727 7,500 1,453,270 1,352,108 2,805,379 333,517 223,615 130,399 298,862 6,000 992,394 921,061 1,913,455 227,047 152,230 90,303 203,455 5,000 678,035 627,026 1,305,062 378,080 253,493 147,181 338,794 6,000 1,123,548 1,044,127 2,167,674 120,251 80,625 50,085 107,756 3,000 361,718 332,092 693,810 2,226,934 1,493,106 843,438 1,995,538 10,000 6,569,016 6,150,030 12,719,047 179,859 120,591 72,533 161,170 4,000 538,153 496,709 1,034,862 893,881 599,325 341,425 800,999 7,500 2,643,131 2,468,592 5,111,723 107,103 71,810 45,134 95,974 3,000 323,020 295,781 618,801 112,690 75,556 47,238 100,980 3,000 339,464 311,211 650,674 187,219 125,526 75,305 167,765 4,000 559,815 517,035 1,076,850 890,814 597,269 340,271 798,251 7,500 2,634,105 2,460,123 5,094,228 258,327 173,202 102,083 231,485 6,000 771,097 713,411 1,484,507 350,192 234,795 136,678 313,805 6,000 1,041,471 967,111 2,008,582 1,407,017 943,371 534,667 1,260,817 10,000 4,155,873 3,885,700 8,041,573 2,022 1,356 5,561 1,812 1,000 11,751 5,584 17,336
272,453 182,673 107,403 244,143 6,000 812,671 752,421 1,565,092 1,050,088 704,059 400,251 940,976 10,000 3,105,374 2,899,984 6,005,358 341,999 229,302 133,593 306,462 6,000 1,017,355 944,483 1,961,838 78,056 52,335 34,195 69,945 2,000 236,531 215,563 452,094 841,891 564,468 321,847 754,412 7,500 2,490,118 2,325,016 4,815,134 15 January 2026 CaliforvuaCityF,rarce.cowt Page 6 of 16

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

MADERA COUNTY

CHOWCHILLA
MADERA

MARI N COUNTY

BELVEDERE

CORTE MADERA

FAIRFAX

LARKSPUR

MILL VALLEY
NOVATO
ROSS

SAN ANSELMO

SAN RAFAEL

SAU SALITO

TIBURON

MARI POSA COUNTY

MENDOCI NO COUNTY

FORT BRAGG

POINT ARENA
UKIAH

W I LLITS

MERCED COUNTY

ATWATER

DOS PALOS

GUSTINE

LIVINGSTON

LOS BANOS
MERCED

MODOC COUNTY

ALTURAS

MONO COUNTY

MAMMOTH LAKES
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
184,670 123,817 51,574 165,481 4,000 529,541 509,995 1,039,536 636,742 426,920 166,076 570,579 7,500 1,807,817 1,758,463 3,566,280 20,355 13,647 13,431 18,240 1,000 66,673 56,213 122,886 97,855 65,609 46,292 87,687 3,000 300,444 270,242 570,685 72,785 48,801 35,662 65,222 2,000 224,470 201,007 425,477 125,349 84,044 57,951 112,325 3,000 382,668 346,172 728,840 135,421 90,797 62,221 121,350 3,000 412,789 373,987 786,777 509,505 341,611 220,840 456,563 7,500 1,536,018 1,407,078 2,943,096 22,387 15,010 14,292 20,060 1,000 72,749 61,824 134,573 122,522 82,148 56,752 109,791 3,000 374,214 338,365 712,578 590,301 395,783 255,099 528,964 7,500 1,777,648 1,630,210 3,407,858 68,223 45,742 33,728 61,134 2,000 210,828 188,410 399,238 87,524 58,683 41,912 78,430 2,000 268,548 241,712 510,260 68,875 46,179 33,752 61,718 2,000 212,525 190,209 402,734 4,408 2,956 6,653 3,950 1,000 18,967 12,174 31,142
159,102 106,674 71,680 142,570 4,000 484,025 439,384 923,409 47,408 31,786 24,729 42,482 1,000 147,406 130,926 278,332 305,342 204,725 94,390 273,615 6,000 884,072 843,252 1,727,324 55,535 37,235 21,094 49,765 2,000 165,629 153,369 318,998 58,257 39,060 21,893 52,203 2,000 173,413 160,885 334,298 138,392 92,789 45,405 124,012 3,000 403,598 382,192 785,790 468,584 314,174 142,286 419,895 6,000 1,350,939 1,294,069 2,645,008 939,535 629,936 280,467 841,910 7,500 2,699,348 2,594,675 5,294,023 26,067 17,477
14,381 24,921
1,000 83,846
71,987 155,832
69,191 46,391
65,523 2,046,819
2,000 2,229,924
191,083 2,421,007
15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

MONTEREY COUNTY

CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

DEL REY OAKS

GONZALES

GREENFIELD

KING CITY
MARINA

MONTEREY

PACIFIC GROVE

SALINAS

SAND CITY

SEASIDE

SOLEDAD

NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON

CALISTOGA
NAPA

SAINT HELENA

YOUNTVILLE

NEVADA COUNTY

GRASS VALLEY

NEVADA CITY

TRUCKEE
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
30,360 20,356 13,656 27,205 1,000 92,576 83,843 176,420 15,132 10,146 9,214 13,560 1,000 49,051 41,789 90,841
81,918 54,924 28,694 73,406 2,000 240,942 226,229 467,171 199,188 133,551 62,900 178,491 5,000 579,131 550,090 1,129,222 137,463 92,165 44,896 123,179 3,000 400,703 379,625 780,328 221,240 148,336 69,332 198,251 5,000 642,159 610,988 1,253,147 272,874 182,956 84,394 244,521 6,000 790,744 753,586 1,544,330 143,538 96,239 46,668 128,624 3,000 418,069 396,404 814,473 1,550,345 1,039,469 457,014 1,389,252 10,000 4,446,080 4,281,522 8,727,602 3,575 2,397 5,843 3,203 1,000 16,017 9,872 25,889
313,670 210,308 96,293 281,078 6,000 907,350 866,250 1,773,600 264,019 177,019 81,811 236,586 6,000 765,435 729,131 1,494,566 214,627 143,902 71,098 192,326 5,000 626,953 592,727 1,219,680 50,188 33,650 20,303 44,973 2,000 151,113 138,601 289,714 746,729 500,664 235,463 669,138 7,500 2,159,494 2,062,211 4,221,705 51,711 34,671 20,774 46,338 2,000 155,494 142,809 298,303 28,606 19,180 13,636 25,634 1,000 88,056 79,000 167,056 130,428 87,449 118,687 116,876 3,000 456,441 360,199 816,640 32,085 21,512 32,816 34,351 1,000 121,764 88,607 210,371 162,226 108,768 146,452 2,079,169 4,000 2,500,616 448,012 2,948,628 15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

ORANGE COUNTY

ALISO VIEJO

ANAHEIM
BREA

BUENA PARK

COSTA MESA

CYPRESS

DANA POINT

FOUNTAIN VALLEY

FULLERTON

GARDEN GROVE

HUNTINGTON BEACH
IRVINE

LAGUNA BEACH

LAGUNA HILLS

LAGUNA NIGUEL

LAGUNA WOODS

LA HABRA

LAKE FOREST

LA PALMA

LOS ALAMITOS

MISSION VIEJO

NEWPORT BEACH
ORANGE

PLACENTIA

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA

SAN CLEMENTE

SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO

SANTA ANA

SEAL BEACH

STANTON

TU S -I N

VILLA PARK
WESTMI\STER

YORBA LINDA
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
496,356 332,795 217,084 444,781 7,500 1,498,516 1,370,767 2,869,283 3,319,256 2,225,481 1,424,392 2,974,359 10,000 9,953,487 9,166,648 19,120,136 459,039 307,775 201,124 411,341 6,000 1,385,279 1,267,709 2,652,988 807,018 541,086 349,948 723,162 7,500 2,428,714 2,228,707 4,657,421 1,078,110 722,846 465,890 966,086 10,000 3,242,931 2,977,370 6,220,301 482,566 323,549 211,186 432,424 7,500 1,457,224 1,332,683 2,789,907 317,580 212,930 140,624 284,581 6,000 961,716 877,048 1,838,764 547,455 367,055 238,937 490,570 7,500 1,651,517 1,511,882 3,163,399 1,378,804 924,455 594,492 1,235,536 10,000 4,143,287 3,807,785 7,951,072 1,647,816 1,104,821 709,544 1,476,595 10,000 4,948,777 4,550,705 9,499,483 1,900,604 1,274,309 817,657 1,703,117 10,000 5,705,688 5,248,819 10,954,506 3,053,511 2,047,306 1,310,737 2,736,228 10,000 9,157,782 8,432,753 17,590,535 220,300 147,706 99,019 197,410 5,000 669,435 608,395 1,277,830 300,618 201,557 133,369 269,381 6,000 910,926 830,204 1,741,130 625,376 419,300 272,263 560,395 7,500 1,884,834 1,727,075 3,611,909 170,046 114,012 77,526 152,377 4,000 517,960 469,608 987,568 601,226 403,108 261,935 538,754 7,500 1,812,523 1,660,381 3,472,904 839,869 563,112 363,998 752,600 7,500 2,527,080 2,319,431 4,846,511 149,240 100,062 68,628 133,733 4,000 455,663 412,151 867,814 115,057 77,143 54,008 103,102 3,000 352,309 317,748 670,057 896,995 601,414 388,430 803,790 7,500 2,698,129 2,477,194 5,175,323 815,499 546,772 353,576 730,762 7,500 2,454,109 2,252,129 4,706,238 1,348,301 904,003 581,446 1,208,202 10,000 4,051,951 3,723,545 7,775,496 517,325 346,854 226,051 463,571 7,500 1,561,300 1,428,674 2,989,974 459,183 307,871 201,185 411,470 6,000 1,385,709 1,268,106 2,653,815 614,317 411,885 267,533 550,485 7,500 1,851,720 1,696,534 3,548,254 338,568 227,002 149,600 303,388 6,000 1,024,557 935,008 1,959,565 3,021,848 2,026,076 1,297,195 2,707,855 10,000 9,062,974 8,345,311 17,408,285 242,438 162,549 108,487 217,247 6,000 736,720 669,530 1,406,250 388,621 260,561 171,007 348,240 6,000 1,174,430 1,073,239 2,247,669 769,940 516,226 334,091 689,937 7,500 2,317,694 2,126,311 4,444,005 56,148 37,646 28,814 50,314 2,000 174,923 155,063 329,985 871,446 584,284 377,503 780,896 7,500 2,621,629 2,406,636 5,028,265 652,114 437,226 283,698 584,354 7,500 1,964,892 1,800,914 3,765,807 15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN
COLFAX

LINCOLN
LOOMIS

ROCKLIN

ROSEVILLE

PLUMAS COUNTY

PO RTO LA

RI VERSI DE COUNTY

BANNING

BEAUMONT
BLYTHE

CALIMESA

CANYON LAKE

CATHEDRAL CITY

COACHELLA
CORONA

DESERT I -O SPRINGS

EASTVALE
HEMET

INDIAN WELLS
INDIO

JURUPA VALLEY

LAKE ELSINORE

LA QUINTA

MENIFEE

MORENO VALLEY

M U RRI ETA
NORCO

PALM DESERT

PALM SPRINGS
PERRIS

RANCHO MIRAGE

RIVERSIDE

SAN JACI NTO

TEMECULA

WILDOMAR
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
131,933 88,458 59,955 118,224 3,000 401,570 364,354 765,924 19,157 12,844 12,809 18,506 1,000 64,316 52,905 117,221 522,480 350,311 223,225 468,191 7,500 1,571,707 1,442,912 3,014,619 65,233 43,737 32,071 58,455 2,000 201,497 180,152 381,649 701,228 470,156 297,952 628,365 7,500 2,105,201 1,936,551 4,041,752 1,518,893 1,018,381 639,780 1,361,068 10,000 4,548,121 4,194, 662 8,742,783 20,230 13,564
9,483 169,727
1,000 214,005
55,869 269,874
306,176 205,284 133,383 274,362 6,000 925,206 845,554 1,770,760 572,199 383,645 245,104 512,743 7,500 1,721,190 1,580,217 3,301,407 179,955 120,655 80,375 161,256 4,000 546,241 496,974 1,043,215 105,359 70,640 49,047 94,411 3,000 322,457 290,964 613,421 105,991 71,064 49,313 94,978 3,000 324,346 292,711 617,057 494,986 331,876 212,677 443,553 7,500 1,490,592 1,366,982 2,857,575 425,344 285,183 183,430 381,148 6,000 1,281,105 1,174,656 2,455,761 1,525,246 1,022,641 645,351 1,366,761 10,000 4,569,999 4,212,208 8,782,208 318,759 213,720 138,668 285,638 6,000 962,785 880,304 1,843,088 668,903 448,484 285,716 599,399 7,500 2,010,003 1,847,282 3,857,285 881,029 590,709 374,802 789,484 7,500 2,643,524 2,433,102 5,076,625 46,594 31,240 24,368 41,752 1,000 144,954 128,676 273,631 886,827 594,596 377,237 794,679 7,500 2,660,839 2,449,113 5,109,953 1,015,138 680,625 431,123 909,657 10,000 3,046,543 2,803,463 5,850,006 707,083 474,082 301,751 633,612 7,500 2,124,028 1,952,722 4,076,750 371,793 249,278 160,940 333,161 6,000 1,121,172 1,026,765 2,147,937 1,105,106 740,947 468,906 990,277 10,000 3,315,235 3,051,924 6,367,159 2,020,376 1,354,613 853,288 1,810,443 10,000 6,048,721 5,579,587 11,628,309 1,071,305 718,284 454,711 959,988 10,000 3,214,290 2,958,579 6,172,869 255,184 171,094 111,968 228,668 6,000 772,914 704,730 1,477,644 498,139 333,990 214,001 446,378 7,500 1,500,009 1,375,689 2,875,698 426,226 285,774 183,800 381,938 6,000 1,283,738 1,177,090 2,460,829 778,546 521,996 331,762 697,649 7,500 2,337,453 2,150,077 4,487,530 164,066 110,002 73,702 147,018 4,000 498,788 453,094 951,881 3,069,879 2,058,280 1,294,044 2,750,895 10,000 9,183,098 8,477,957 17,661,055 526,985 353,330 226,115 472,227 7,500 1,586,157 1,455,351 3,041,509 1,075,436 721,054 456,446 963,690 10,000 3,226,625 2,969,986 6,196,611 355,319 238,233 154,022 318,399 6,000 1,071,973 981,270 2,053,243 15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance sta ewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)") Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

CITRUS HEIGHTS

ELK GROVE
FOLSOM
GALT

ISLETON

RANCHO CORDOVA

SACRAMENTO

SAN BENITO COUNTY
.6
SA\ R.

SAN BERNARDI NO COUNTY
. p Al p
AP )LE VA__EY

BA STOW
BIG BEAR LA <E
C-I\O
C-I\O -ILLS
CO LTO \
l O \-ANA
GAN\D TE ACE
-
ES)E�IA
-IGI-LA\D
OVA L_\DA
MO\ -C _A_
\EED_ES
ON\TA2IO
RA\CI-O CLCAMO\GA
REDLA\DS
RIA_ 0
SA\ BERNARDI\O
W:\TY\I\E PALMS
LP_A\D

VIC-ORVILLE

YUCAIPA
YLCCA VA__EY
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
840,655 563,639 372,451 753,304 7,500 2,537,549 2,321,601 4,859,151 1,752,226 1,174,826 771,117 1,570,156 10,000 5,278,325 4,839,049 10,117,374 887,191 594,840 392,803 795,005 7,500 2,677,340 2,450,119 5,127,460 250,047 167,650 114,155 224,065 6,000 761,918 690,544 1,452,462 7,619 5,108 8,132 6,827 1,000 28,686 21,040 49,726
818,901 549,053 362,937 733,811 7,500 2,472,202 2,261,524 4,733,727 5,059,771 3,392,455 2,217,635 4,534,022 20,000 15,223,882 13,973,357 29,197,239 6,796 279,452
77,604 373,488 6,000
,253,339
5 ,0L8 2,404,387
A
BA L T_STA
19,972
13,390 13,080
17,896 1,000
65,339 55,155 120,493
356,019 238,702
727,534 487,79
149,389 319,026 6,000 ,069,136 983,202 2,052,339
300,272 65',938 7,500 2,'75,038 2,009,200 4,'84,238
244,699 ' 64,065 ' 04,179
48,309 32,390 24,L20
912,386 611,733 375,346
75' ,' ' 8 503,607 309,85'
515,168 345,408 214,025
2,' 00,387 ,L08,259 857,827
125,790 84,339 55,887
975,50' 654,050 400,979
547,090 366,8' 1 226,989
242,668 ' 62,703 ' 03,35L
364,328 244,273 ' 52,764
47,' 88 3' ,638 23,96L
1,767,195 1,184,862 722,508
,686,58' 1,' 30,8' 2 689,769
704,256 472,187 290,8'8
, 0' ' ,659 678,293 4' 5,66
2,' 38,222 1,433,626 873,193
270,986 ' 8' ,690 ' ' L, 855
758,421 508,503 3 2,816
,35' ,367 906,059 553,629
525,528 352,354 2' 8,232
2' ' ,09' ' 4' ,53 90,530
219,273
629,279
817,582
673,07'
46' ,638
,882,' 40
1' 2,720
874,' 39
490,223
2' 7,453
326,471
42,285
,583,570
,5" ,332
63' ,078
906,540
,916,044
242,829
679,615
,2' 0,950
470,922
89,' 57
6,000
2,000
7,500
7,500
7,500
0,000
3,000
0,000
7,500
6,000
6,000
,000
0,000
0,000
7,500
0,000
0,000
6,000
7,500
0,000
7,500
5,000
738,217 675,776
736,398 '33,4'4
2,724,546 2,519,698
2,245, 'L7 2,074,332
1,543,739 1,422,719
6,258,6' 3 5,800,550
381,736 347,389
2,9'4,670 2,694,00'
',638,634 ',5'0,876
732,178 670,166
1,093,835 1,006,148
46,076 ' 30,3' 7
5,268,136 4,880,389
5,028,493 L,657,759
2,' 05,840 1,944,9' 5
3,022,155 2,793,856
6,371,084 5,905,037
8'6,360 748,372
2,266,855 2,094,499
4,032,005 3,732,0'4
,57L,535 1,45' ,328
637,309 582,96'
1,4' 3,994
869,8' 2
5,244,244
4,3' 9,479
2,966,458
12,059,' 63
729,125
5,608,67'
3,'49,5' 0
1,402,3
2,099,984
276,393
10,148,525
9,686,252
4,050,754
5,8' 6,0' 2
12,276,121
,56L,732
4,361,354
7,764,0' 9
3,025,864
,220,270
15 January 2026
CaliforviiaCityFinavtce.covvt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance sta ewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)") Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3)
Sec2107 (3)
Sec2107.5 1
ALS BAAVKiZK�11P►iZ� _
C-LLA V_STA
CORO\ADO

DEL NAR

EL CAJON
ENC_VITAS

ESCO VDIDO
IMPE?IA_ BEACI-

A N ESA
=NO\GROVE
\AT=Or\A_ CITY

OCEANSIDE
DOWAY
SA\ DIEGO
SA \ MA .COS
SA \-EE
SO _ANA BEACI-
VISTA

SAN JOAQUI N COUNTY
ATHROP
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
5,
87 747,706 484,938 999,3
0,000 3,357,142
2,696,745 1,808,102 1,165,868 2,416,532 10,000 8,097,248 225,2L5 ' 5' ,022 ' 0 ,778 20' ,8L' 5,000 684,886
37,864 25,387 21,102 33,929 1,000 119,281
,0' 8,904 683,' 5' 443,483 9' 3,032 ' 0,000 3,068,570
593,742 398,090 260,432 532,047 7,500 1,791,81'
,449,845 972,086 629,023 ,299,195 0,000 4,360,149
254,695 170,767 114,457 228,230 6,000 774,149
583,698 39',356 256,'08 523,0L8 7,500 ',76',7'0
269,894 180,957 121,001 24' ,850 6,000 819,703
565,078 378,87' 2L8,09' 506,362 7,500 ',705,903
1,670,749 1,120,197 724,132 1,497,145 10,000 5,022,223
482,796 323,703 2'2,665 432,630 7,500 ',L59,294
13,502,239 9,052,926 5,818,113 12,099,251 20,000 40,492,530 930,757 624,050 405,532 834,044 7,500 2,80',883
57',681 383,298 250,934 5'2,279 7,500 1,725,692
22,448 83,440 58,38' ",5'7 3,000 380,786
973,652 652,810 42L,000 872,L82 7,500 2,930,444
3,079,766 6,436,907
7,447,487 15,544,734
622,05' 1,306,937
104,566 223,847
2,8' 3,862 5,882,232
1,639,7' 2 3,43' ,522
2,003,976 8,364,' 2L
703,380 1,477,529
',6",976 3,373,686
745,355 1,565,057
1,560,553 3,266,455
4,6'4,038 9,636,261
,333,3' 8 2,792,6' 2
37,288,565 77,781,095
2,570,432 5,372,3'6
1,578,787 3,304,480
3L3,684 722,470
2,688,893 5,6' 9,337
8,375,452 5,615,539
2,123,371 7,505,178
20,000 23,639,540
23,130,133 46,769,673
7',338
L7,830 33,628 63,925 2,000
2' 8,722 ' 97,0'
4' 5,733
369,876 247,993 '5L,269 33',443
6L2,97' 43',097
6,000 1,' 09,582
7,500 1,922,357
7,500 2,680,766 2,480,7' 4 5,' 6' ,279
5,000 831,537 762,081 1,593,618
4,000 463,959 423,134 887,093
0,000 9,' 49,78' 8,492,228 17,622,030
7,500 2,808,363 2,599,333 5,407,696
,02' ,L72 2,' 3' ,053
ODI

MAN ECA

MOUNTAIN HOUSE
RIPON
STOC <-ON
-ZALY
26L,628 576,16
898,270 602,268 367,795 80L,932
275,951 185,018 118,291 247,277
153,217 102,729 66,716 137,297
3,075,054 2,06' ,750 1,247,245 2,755,532
94' ,222 63' ,067 385,152 843,4 22
1,775,666 3,698,023
175,824 117,886
295,' 65 ' 97,90'
300,752 201,647 154,143 269,502 6,000 932,044 830,574 1,762,6'9 22,56' 82,'7L 65,659 09,826 3,000 383,220 338,470 72',690 0','7' 67,833 55,038 90,658 3,000 3'7,699 279,399 597,098 77,' 84 5' ,750 43,' 27 69,' 64 2,000 243,224 2' 3,' 55 456,379 474,698 318,274 240,519 425,373 6,000 1,464,864 1,310,954 2,775,819 92,108 157,555 4,000 547,374 485,567 1,032,941
5',369 264,495 6,000 9'4,930 8'5,'45 ,730,075

ATASCADERO

EL PASO DE ROBES

GROVER BEAC-
1 O R RO BAY

DISNO BEAC-I
SA\ _l._S OB_SPO
15 January 2026
CaliforviiaCityFinavtce.covvt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance sta ewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)") Streets & Highways Code Atl,V IMIZK•1111Z11 -
HER
BE _VO\-
BR_SBAI\E
BJ2_I\GAVE
COLVA
DALY C_TY

EAST PALO ALTO

OSTER CITY
-ALF MOON BAY
- ILLSBORO JG -
VE\_O PAR<
V _ __BRAE
3ACIFICA
O -OLA VA __EY

REDWOOD CI Y
SA . BRU \O
SA\ CARLOS
-SA\ MA t0
SOLTF SAN FAA\C=SCO

WOODSIDE
Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3)
Sec2107 (3)
Sec2107.5 (
68,827 46,1L7
270,306
L6,488
302,372
' 4,202
,004,673
287,824
322,822
''2,6'3
08,991
327,22'
223,492
370,63
42,521
799,763
42 29
,0'
63L
,674
x,57'
3''6
,969
50,858
34,292 6
TOTAL
HUTA
,675 2,000 2'2,9L2
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
90,077
181,234 120,626 242,219 6,000 820,385 746,493
3',169 2L,720 1,658 ',000 'L5,036 28,385
202,733 134,366 270,953 6,000 916,424 835,047
9,522 0,886 2,727 000 48,337 39,222
673,609 435,303 900,280 10,000 3,023,864 2,774,563
92,979 ' 28,' 33 257,9' 7 6,000 872,853 79L,872
216,445 143,130 289,279 6,000 977,675 891,525
75,50L 53,055 ' 00,912 3,000 3L5,08L 3' 0,999
73,076 51,503 97,666 3,000 334,235 300,995
2'9,39L 'L5,0'4 293,220 6,000 990,850 903,673
149,846 100,566 200,269 5,000 679,173 6'7,208
248,501 '63,6'7 332,'22 6,000 ','20,872 023,563
28,509 23,020 38,103 1,000 133,153 117,429
536,222 347,499 7' 6,662 7,500 2,407,6L6 2,208,672
282,722 '85,488 377,859 6,000 1,273,742 1,164,519
97,503 ' 3' ,024 263,963 6,000 893,060 8' 3,504
6/9,2/0 438,921 907,8L5 0,000 3,0L9,151 2,797,879
425,73' 276,885 568,99 7,500 9'4,076 753,567
34,099 26,593 45,574 2,000 159,125 140,454
TOTAL
L03,0' 9
1,566,878
273,L22
1,751,471
87,559
5,798,427
,667,726
1,869,200
656,083
635,229
' ,894,523
1,296,381
2,' 44,435
250,582
L,6' 6,3' 8
2,438,262
,706,564
5,8L7,030
3,667,6L3
299,578

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
:1 •l
CARPII\TE CIA
L9,296 33,052 2',682 44,171
25,934 84,L36 47,928
2,000 ' 50,205 ' 36,140 286,3«
' 2,8L8 3,000 374,145
347,786 72',932
GOLE-A

GLADALJ)E
OV'OC
SA\ -A BARBARA
-SA\ A VAR_A
SO _VA JG
3'3,821 2'0,41 '
8L,822 56,87' 33,8L8 76,008
426,887 286,218 150,992 382,530
837,655 56' ,628 29' ,665 750,6' 7
,0/5,32' 720,9// 3 3,056 963,587
55,7'7 37,357 23,88' L9,928
''2,273 28',215
6,000 923,722 866,671 1,790,396
2,000 253,5L9 234,248 L87,797
6,000 1,252,628 1,178,917 2,431,544
7,500 2,L19,065 2,3' 3,3' 8 4,762,382
0,000 3,'L2,910 2,969,668 6,"2,608
2,000 ' 68,883 ' 53,872 322,755
15 January 2026
CaliforviiaCityFinavtce.covvt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

SANTA CLARA COUNTY

CAMPBELL

CUPERTINO
GILROY

LOS ALTOS

LOS ALTOS HILLS

LOS GATOS

MILPITAS

MONTE SERENO

MORGAN HILL

MOUNTAIN VIEW

PALO ALTO

SAN JOSE

SANTA CLARA

SARATOGA

SUNNYVALE

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

CAPITO LA

SANTA CRUZ

SCOTTS VALLEY

WATSONVILLE

SHASTA COUNTY

ANDERSON

REDDING

SHASTA LAKE

SI ERRA COUNTY

LOYALTON

SI SKI YOU COUNTY
DORRIS

DUNSMUIR
ETNA

FORT JONES

MONTAGUE

MOUNT SHASTA

TULELAKE
WEED
YREKA
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
419,048 280,962 172,577 375,506 6,000 1,254,093 1,157,268 2,411,360 578,236 387,693 236,312 518,153 7,500 1,727,894 1,596,890 3,324,784 596,128 399,689 243,476 534,186 7,500 1,780,979 1,646,302 3,427,280 303,982 203,812 126,507 272,396 6,000 912,697 839,493 1,752,190 81,918 54,924 37,598 73,406 2,000 249,846 226,229 476,075 320,513 214,896 133,126 287,209 6,000 961,744 885,147 1,846,891 785,014 526,333 319,101 703,445 7,500 2,341,395 2,167,941 4,509,336 34,854 23,369 18,755 31,233 1,000 109,211 96,256 205,467 446,571 299,415 183,597 400,169 6,000 1,335,752 1,233,277 2,569,030 829,078 555,877 336,744 742,931 7,500 2,472,130 2,289,631 4,761,761 659,272 442,026 268,757 590,769 7,500 1,968,324 1,820,684 3,789,009 9,702,612 6,505,368 3,889,499 8,694,435 20,000 28,811,914 26,795,295 55,607,209 1,289,785 864,770 521,200 1,155,766 10,000 3,841,521 3,561,945 7,403,466 298,136 199,893 124,167 267,157 6,000 895,353 823,349 1,718,702 1,530,191 1,025,956 617,453 1,371,192 10,000 4,554,793 4,225,865 8,780,658 94,482 63,348 40,096 84,664 2,000 284,590 260,926 545,515 619,990 415,689 236,414 555,569 7,500 1,835,162 1,712,201 3,547,363 115,661 77,548 48,008 103,643 3,000 347,859 319,415 667,274 496,500 332,891 190,281 444,910 7,500 1,472,083 1,371,164 2,843,247 107,055 71,778 60,257 95,931 3,000 338,020 295,649 633,669 898,394 602,352 470,188 805,044 7,500 2,783,478 2,481,058 5,264,536 99,110 66,451 56,141 88,812 3,000 313,515 273,709 587,223 7,072 4,742
6,449 7,779
1,000 27,043
19,532 46,575
8,222 5,513 8,917 7,368 1,000 31,020 22,708 53,728
16,320 10,942 12,971 51,146 1,000 92,380 45,071 137,451 6,555 4,395 8,082 5,874 1,000 25,906 18,103 44,008
6,651 4,459 8,130 5,960 1,000 26,200 18,367 44,567
11,778 7,897 10,697 10,554 1,000 41,925 32,526 74,452
31,059 20,825 20,350 90,158 1,000 163,392 85,775 249,167 8,625 5,783 9,118 7,729 1,000 32,255 23,819 56,074
27,974 18,756 18,805 66,222 1,000 132,757 77,254 210,010 75,507 50,625 42,603 75,048 2,000 245,783 208,524 454,307 15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5 (4)

SOLANO COUNTY

BENICIA
DIXON

FAIRFIELD

RIO VISTA

SUISUN CITY

VACAVI LLE

VALLEJO

SONOMA COUNTY

CLOVERDALE
COTATI

HEALDSBURG

PETALUMA

ROHNERT PARK

SANTA ROSA

SEBASTOPOL
SONOMA

WINDSOR
1 TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
259,534 174,012 113,822 232,567 6,000 785,935 716,745 1,502,680 193,333 129,625 86,013 173,244 4,000 586,215 533,920 1,120,135 1,156,894 775,669 490,773 1,036,683 10,000 3,470,019 3,194,945 6,664,964 99,072 66,425 46,417 88,778 3,000 303,692 273,603 577,295 282,266 189,253 123,371 252,936 6,000 853,825 779,522 1,633,347 988,813 662,975 420,167 886,067 10,000 2,968,022 2,730,762 5,698,784 1,206,880 809,184 511,770 1,081,476 10,000 3,619,310 3,332,990 6,952,300 86,336 57,886 41,689 77,365 2,000 265,276 238,430 503,706 72,651 48,711 35,842 65,102 2,000 224,305 200,637 424,942 108,368 72,658 51,103 97,107 3,000 332,236 299,275 631,511 573,349 384,416 249,778 513,773 7,500 1,728,816 1,583,392 3,312,208 422,354 283,178 185,262 378,468 6,000 1,275,263 1,166,398 2,441,661 1,710,156 1,146,618 735,507 1,532,457 10,000 5,134,738 4,722,865 9,857,603 72,095 48,338 35,604 64,604 2,000 222,641 199,102 421,743

TAN SLAUS COUNTY
CERES

HUGHSON

MODESTO
NEWMAN

OAKDALE

PATTERSON
103,212 69,201 48,900 92,487 3,000 316,800 285,036
251,245 168,454
112,151 225,139
6,000 762,988 693,852
601,836
1,456,840
481,368 322,746 193,163 431,350 7,500 1,436,127 1,329,374 2,765,501 76,446 51,255 34,714 68,503 2,000 232,917 211,117 444,034 2,106,070 1,412,069 828,919 1,887,233 10,000 6,244,291 5,816,244 12,060,535 118,727 79,604 51,259 106,391 3,000 358,980 327,884 686,865 222,629 149,268 91,916 199,496 5,000 668,309 614,826 1,283,135 247,900 166,211 101,805 222,142 6,000 744,058 684,616 1,428,674

RIVERBANK

TURLOCK

WATERFORD

SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK

YUBA CITY
1 _

CORNING

RED BLUFF
TEHAMA

EHAMA COUNTY

TRINITY COUNTY
250,028 167,638 102,638 224,048 6,000 750,351 690,491 1,440,842 692,095 464,033 275,621 620,181 7,500 2,059,430 1,911,330 3,970,760 87,869 58,914 39,184 78,739 2,000 266,706 242,664 509,370 92,555 62,056 39,593 82,938 2,000 279,142 255,606 534,748 675,171 452,686 258,605 605,015 7,500 1,998,978 1,864,591 3,863,569 79,235 53,125 34,596 71,001 2,000 239,957 218,819 458,775 141,909 95,147 58,164 127,164 3,000 425,384 391,905 817,289 4,159 2,789 6,364 3,727 1,000 18,039 11,486 29,525
15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT A
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2025-26 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estimated January 2026

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA
EXETER

FARMERSVILLE

LINDSAY

PORTERVILLE
TULARE

VISALIA

WOODLAKE

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA

VENTURA COUNTY

CAMARILLO

FILLMORE

MOORPARK
OJAI
OXNARD

PORT HUENEME

SAN BUENAVENTURA

SANTA PAULA

SIMI VALLEY

THOUSAND OAKS

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTA)11 Streets & Highways Code Sec2103 (3)
Sec2105 (3)
Sec2106 (3)
Sec2107 (3)
Sec2107.5 (4)
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
249,405 167,220 95,433 223,490 6,000 741,547 688,771 1,430,318 99,187 66,502 40,844 88,881 3,000 298,414 273,920 572,335 99,589 66,772 40,990 89,241 3,000 299,594 275,032 574,626 121,947 81,763 49,115 109,276 3,000 365,101 336,777 701,878 609,707 408,794 226,365 546,354 7,500 1,798,721 1,683,804 3,482,525 699,599 469,064 259,031 626,905 7,500 2,062,099 1,932,052 3,994,151 1,408,531 944,386 516,655 1,262,174 10,000 4,141,747 3,889,882 8,031,629 76,714 51,435 32,678 68,743 2,000 231,570 211,858 443,428 49,862 33,431
33,276 44,681
2,000 163,250
137,701 300,951
678,238 454,742 295,232 607,763 7,500 2,043,475 1,873,060 3,916,535 163,251 109,456 74,707 146,288 4,000 497,702 450,844 948,546 347,106 232,727 153,436 311,039 6,000 1,050,309 958,589 2,008,898 73,676 49,398 36,349 66,021 2,000 227,444 203,469 430,913 1,932,938 1,295,989 832,514 1,732,091 10,000 5,803,532 5,338,114 11,141,646 211,455 141,776 95,348 189,483 5,000 643,062 583,967 1,227,029 1,054,928 707,304 456,537 945,312 10,000 3,174,080 2,913,349 6,087,429 303,388 203,414 134,715 271,863 6,000 919,380 837,853 1,757,233 1,209,400 810,874 522,684 1,083,734 10,000 3,636,693 3,339,950 6,976,643 1,215,409 814,903 525,257 1,089,119 10,000 3,654,688 3,356,544 7,011,232 626,967 420,366 281,819 561,820 7,500 1,898,472 1,731,468 3,629,941 530,943 355,984 239,391 475,773 7,500 1,609,591 1,466,282 3,075,873

WEST SACRAMENTO

WINTERS

WOODLAND

YUBA COUNTY
76,867 51,538
38,763 68,880
2,000 238,049
7,500 1,788,917
212,282 450,330

MARYSVILLE

W H EATLAN D
590,551 395,950
265,728 529,188
1,630,899 3,419,815
126,126 84,564 45,299 113,020
38,448
25,779 17,146
3,000 372,009 348,316 720,324
34,453 1,000 116,825
106,181 223,006
Statewide Total $ 320,491,000 $ 214,881,500 $ 128,094,662 $ 293,573,000 $ 2,724,000 $ 959,764,162 $ 885,086,500 $ 1,844,850,662 Notes:

1. The Highway Users Tax is also known as the "Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax", the "Gasoline Excise Tax" and "Article XIX Revenues."

2. Rolling Hills has no public streets and is therefore not eligible for HUTA or RMRA allocations.

3. Str&HwysCode §§ 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and RMRA amounts are paid monthly. Includes special payments for snow removal.

4. Str&HwysCode § 2107.5 amounts are typically paid by the State Controller once per year in July. 15 January 2026
CaliforvuaCityFivtar ce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2026-27 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estim ated January 2026

ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA
ALBANY

BERKELEY
DUBLIN

EMERYVILLE
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTAY) Streets & Highways Code
Sec2103 (3)
Sec2105 (3)
Sec2106 (3)
Sec2107 (3)
Sec2107.5 (4)
TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
772,536 516,581 291,689 690,786 7,500 2,279,092 2,217,185 4,496,277 206,977 138,402 81,663 185,075 5,000 617,118 594,027 1,211,145 1,254,789 839,055 470,778 1,122,008 10,000 3,696,630 3,601,256 7,297,886 730,214 488,281 275,972 652,943 7,500 2,154,909 2,095,719 4,250,628 131,699 88,065 53,708 117,762 3,000 394,233 377,976 772,210 2,274,191 1,520,710 849,343 2,033,536 10,000 6,687,780 6,526,946 13,214,726 1,603,623 1,072,314 600,321 1,433,928 10,000 4,720,186 4,602,412 9,322,598

FREMONT

HAYWARD

LIVERMORE
858,012 573,737 323,431 767,217 7,500 2,529,896 2,462,500 4,992,397 477,932 319,584 182,285 427,357 6,000 1,413,159 1,371,669 2,784,828 NEWARK

OAKLAND

PIEDMONT

PLEASANTON

SAN LEANDRO

UNION CITY

ALPI NE COUNTY

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR
IONE
4,234,655 2,831,636 1,577,381 3,786,544 10,000 12,440,216 12,153,495 24,593,711 110,161 73,663 45,709 98,504 3,000 331,037 316,163 647,201 780,201 521,706 294,535 697,640 7,500 2,301,582 2,239,183 4,540,765 888,915 594,401 334,907 794,850 7,500 2,620,574 2,551,193 5,171,767 685,252 458,215 259,275 612,738 7,500 2,022,981 1,966,678 3,989,659 1,955 1,307 5,753 1,748 1,000 11,764 5,612 17,375
88,350 59,078 47,844 79,001 2,000 276,272 253,565 529,837 49,185 32,889 28,763 43,981 2,000 156,818 141,162 297,981 10,969 7,335 10,144 9,808 1,000 39,257 31,482 70,738
25,849 17,285 17,394 23,114 1,000 84,641 74,187 158,828

JACKSON

PLYMOUTH

SUTTER CREEK

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS
CHICO
19,289 12,898 12,458 17,248 1,000 62,893 55,359 118,252 1,113,021 744,257 446,685 995,241 10,000 3,309,203 3,194,379 6,503,582

GRIDLEY
71,622 47,893 33,235 64,043 2,000 218,793 205,557 424,350

OROVILLE

PARADISE

CALAVERAS COUNTY

ANGELS CAMP

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA

WILLIAMS
195,617 130,806 82,463 174,917 4,000 587,803 561,423 1,149,226 108,401 72,486 47,837 101,987 3,000 333,711 311,113 644,824 35,704 23,874 30,561 31,925 1,000 123,065 102,470 225,535 63,899 42,728 21,928 57,137 2,000 187,692 183,391 371,082 54,641 36,537 19,446 48,859 2,000 161,482 156,819 318,301 15 January 2026
CaliforvniaCityFitnatnce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2026-27 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estim ated January 2026

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

ANTIOCH

BRENTWOOD

CLAYTON

CONCORD

DANVILLE

EL CERRITO

HERCULES

LAFAYETTE

MARTI N EZ
MORAGA
OAKLEY
ORINDA
PINOLE

PITTSBURG

PLEASANT HILL

RICHMOND

SAN PABLO

SAN RAMON

WALNUT CREEK

DEL NORTE COUNTY

CRESCENT CITY

EL DORADO COUNTY

PLACERVILLE

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTAY) Streets & Highways Code
Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5(4) TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
1,141,705
642,773
108,167
1,227,142
426,909
253,983
256,388
248,567
366,999
169,162
457,793
190,846
185,117
746,668
337,405
1,133, 092
314,851
827,079
687,344
763,437
429,811
72,329
820,567
285,466
169,834
171,442
166,212
245,405
113,116
306,118
127,615
123,785
499,283
225,617
757,678
210,535
553,053
459,614
457,566
259,705
47,696
491,448
174,099
105,522
106,476
103,374
150,341
71,885
186,347
80,484
78,212
300,906
138,605
454,151
129,661
332,795
277,380
1,020,890
574,755
96,721
1,097,285
381,733
227,106
229,257
222,263
328,163
151,261
409,349
170,651
165,528
667,655
301,701
1,013,188
281,533
739,557
614,609
10,000
7,500
3,000
10,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
4,000
6,000
4,000
4,000
7,500
6,000
10,000
6,000
7,500
7,500
3,393,598
1,914,543
327,912
3,646,442
1,274,207
762,445
769,562
746,416
1,096,907
509,424
1,365,606
573,597
556,642
2,222,012
1,009,328
3,368,109
942,580
2,459,984
2,046,448
3,276,703
1,844,764
310,440
3,521,906
1,225,232
728,932
735,835
713,388
1,053,289
485,497
1,313,869
547,730
531,288
2,142,942
968,356
3,251,983
903,625
2,373,723
1,972,683
6,670,301
3,759,307
638,352
7,168,348
2,499,439
1,491,377
1,505,397
1,459,804
2,150,196
994,920
2,679,475
1,121,327
1,087,930
4,364,954
1,977,684
6,620,092
1,846,205
4,833,707
4,019,130
65,815
44,009
25,453
58,851
2,000
196,128
188,890
385,018
105,781
209,451
70,734
140,056
73,155 94,994
140,146 1,717,290
3,000 347,665
5,000 2,211,943
303,593
601,126
651,258
2,813,069
15 January 2026
CaliforvniaCityFitnatnce.cowt

Attachment C

ATTACHMENT B
Local Streets and Roads - Projected FY2026-27 Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projections Estim ated January 2026

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS

COALINGA

FIREBAUGH
FOWLER
FRESNO
HURON
KERMAN

KINGSBURG

MENDOTA

ORANGE COVE

PARLIER

REEDLEY
SANGER

SAN JOAQUIN
SELMA

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND

WILLOWS

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
Highway Users Tax Acct (HUTAY) Streets & Highways Code
Sec2103 (3) Sec2105 (3) Sec2106 (3) Sec2107 (3) Sec2107.5(4) TOTAL
HUTA
Road Mntnc
Rehab Acct
TOTAL
1,262,347 844,108 430,589 1,128,765 10,000
176,348 117,921 64,282 157,687 4,000
85,192 56,966 33,535 76,177 2,000
74,956 50,122 30,083 67,024 2,000
5,445,802 3,641,509 1,841,668 4,869,527 20,000
67,770 45,317 27,659 60,599 2,000
171,430 114,632 62,623 153,290 4,000
129,880 86,849 48,609 116,136 3,000
124,259 83,090 46,712 111,110 3,000
94,998 63,523 36,843 84,945 2,000
143,215 95,766 53,107 128,060 3,000
260,083 173,913 92,526 232,561 6,000
264,326 176,750 93,957 236,355 6,000
36,153 24,175 16,995 32,328 1,000
241,606 161,557 86,294 216,039 5,000
1 3,675,809 3,622,945 7,298,754
520,237 506,120 1,026,357
253,871 244,502 498,373
224,185 215,125 439,310
5,818,506 15,629,497 31,448,003
203,345 194,502 397,847
505,975 492,006 997,982
384,474 372,758 757,231
368,171 356,624 724,795
282,309 272,645 554,954
423,148 411,029 834,177
765,083 746,441 1,511,524
777,389 758,618 1,536,007
110,651 103,760 214,411
710,496 693,410 1,403,906
ARCATA

BLUE LAKE
EUREKA

FERNDALE

FO RTU NA

RIO DELL

TRINIDAD

IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAW LEY

CALEXICO

CALIPATRIA

EL CENTRO

HOLTVILLE

IMPERIAL

WESTMORLAND

I NYO COUNTY
BISHOP
85,094 56,901 31,757 76,090 2,000 251,842 244,221 496,063 63,303 42,329 24,853 56,604 2,000 189,089 181,679 370,768 185,763 124,216 83,905 166,105 4,000 563,988 533,140 1,097,128 11,781 7,877 9,817 10,534 1,000 41,009 33,811 74,819
263,691 176,325 117,089 235,787 6,000 798,892 756,795 1,555,687 13,628 9,113 10,603 12,186 1,000 46,531 39,114 85,645
122,499 81,913 56,965 109,536 3,000 373,913 351,573 725,486 33,142 22,162 18,913 29,635 1,000 104,852 95,118 199,970 3,001 2,007 6,078 2,684 1,000 14,770 8,614 23,384
283,048 189,269 116,150 253,096 6,000 847,563 812,350 1,659,913 391,772 261,971 158,921 350,315 6,000 1,168,979 1,124,389 2,293,368 63,879 42,715 29,930 57,120 2,000 195,644 183,334 378,978 449,786 300,763 181,743 402,189 6,000 1,340,482 1,290,889 2,631,370 55,579 37,165 26,665 49,698 2,000 171,106 159,513 330,619 223,549 149,483 92,743 199,893 5,000 670,667 641,586 1,312,253 20,374 13,624 12,815 18,218 1,000 66,031 58,474 124,505 37,688 25,201 20,846 33,700 1,000 118,436 108,166 226,601 15 January 2026
CaliforvtiaCityFitnat ce.covvt