Agenda packet — Santa Monica City Council, June 14, 2022 (part 1 of 7)

City of Santa Monica
City Council Meeting
AGENDA

SUE HIMMELRICH
MAYOR

LANA NEGRETE KRISTIN MCCOWAN

COUNCILMEMBER MAYOR PRO TEM

GLEAM DAVIS PHIL BROCK

COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER

CHRISTINE PARRA OSCAR DE LA TORRE

COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER

DAVID WHITE

CITY MANAGER

DOUGLAS SLOAN

CITY ATTORNEY

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN

CITY CLERK

STANDARDS OF BEHAVIOR THAT PROMOTE CIVILITY AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS:
• Treat everyone courteously; • Give open-minded consideration to all viewpoints; • Listen to others respectfully • Focus on the issues and avoid personalizing debate; • Exercise self-control • Embrace respectful disagreement and dissent as democratic rights, inherent components of an inclusive public process, and tools for forging sound decisions
Meetings are broadcast live on CityTV cable channel 16 and on the internet at santamonica.gov. Cable television re-broadcasts air on Thursday and Saturday at 11:30 AM. The agenda will air on CityTV on Saturday and Sunday at 11:00 AM and 6:00 PM, and on Monday and Tuesday at 12:30 PM and 6:00 PM.

City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 2

RULES OF ORDER FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS (Resolution No.11405 (CCS))

WAYS TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT
If you are interested in providing public comment at a City Council meeting, there are several ways to participate:
(1) Written public comment. In lieu of oral public comment, the public is strongly encouraged to submit written public comment on agenda items via email to [email protected]. Written public comment submitted before 12:00 pm on the day of the meeting will be available for online viewing. Please note the agenda item number in the subject line of your written comments. (2) Oral public comment. Persons wishing to address the City Council regarding items on the agenda must be present and submit their name and address (optional) to the City Clerk before the public hearing is opened for that item. Register to speak at the Speaker Kiosk prior to the meeting and throughout the meeting. Remarks from the public are limited to a total of 6 minutes per City Council meeting, with a maximum of 2 minutes and a minimum of one minute per item. Except for the author of the request, public comment on 12-items are limited to 1 minute. Except on Public Input, speakers may donate 2 minutes to another person who may speak for a total of 4 minutes on that item. Both the donor of time and the designated speaker must submit their cards in person together.

Oral public comment from any one individual is limited to a total of 6 minutes per City Council meeting, with a maximum of 2 minutes per agenda item; under some circumstances, Council may change the maximum to 1 minute per agenda item.

ORDER OF BUSINESS (may not be changed except by majority vote of the City Council.)

1. Closed Session.

2. Special Agenda Items (City Manager’s Report
Commendations, Presentations, etc.).

3. Consent Calendar (All items considered in one
motion unless removed by a City Councilmember for
discussion. Public comment shall be heard prior
to City Council discussion).

4. Study Session.

5. Continued Items.

6. Administrative Proceedings.

7. Ordinances:
• 1
st Reading
• 2
nd Reading

8. Staff Administrative Item.

9. Public Hearings.

10. Reports of Boards and Commissions.

11. Resolutions.

12. Written Communications (other than
Reports of Commission and Officers).

13. Councilmember Discussion Items.

14. Public Input (members of the public may
address the City Council only on items
not on the agenda, but within the subject
matter jurisdiction of the City)
Agendas and reports are accessible on the City's webpage at smgov.net/council/agendas. They are also available at the City Clerk's Office and in alternate formats upon request. For a free email subscription to the City Council Agendas, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (310) 458-8211 or [email protected].

Si desea comunicarse con alguien en español, llame a nuestra oficina al (310) 458-8211 y pida hablar con Esterlina Lugo.

City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 3

AGENDAS

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

REGULAR MEETING

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1685 MAIN STREET, ROOM 250,
TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 2022
MEETING BEGINS AT 5:30 PM
WAYS TO PROVIDE REMOTE PUBLIC COMMENT:

Written public comment can be submitted via email to [email protected].

Written comments received prior to 12:00 pm on the day of the meeting will be available online. Please note the agenda item number in the subject line of your written comments.

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL
(Please note that Agenda Items may be reordered during the Council meeting at the discretion of the City Council. In accordance with Charter section 615, the adoption of all ordinances and resolutions shall be by reading of title only unless a Councilmember present dissents.)

1. CLOSED SESSIONS

1.A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation – Litigation has been initiated formally pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): Westin Rowland v. City of Santa Monica, U.S. District Court Case No. 2:21-CV-05051- CAS (AFM).

1.B. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation – Litigation has been initiated formally pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1): Jerrid Powell v. City of Santa Monica, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV15438. - Item pulled and will not be heard. 6/09/22 City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 4

1.C. Conference with Labor Negotiator: Government Code Section 54957.6 -- Agency Designated Representatives: City Manager David White and Chief People Officer Lori Gentles; Bargaining Units: ATA-Administrative Team Associates; IBT-California Teamsters Local 911; FEMA-Santa Monica Fire Executive Management Association; FIRE-Santa Monica Firefighters Local 1109 IAFF; MEA-Municipal Employees Association; AFSCME Local 4819, Management Team Association; PALSSU-Public Attorneys’ Legal Support Staff Union; PAU- Public Attorneys Union; POA-Santa Monica Police Officer Association; SMART TD-The International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Division, Local 1785; STA- Supervisory Team Associates; Coalition of Santa Monica City Employees.

The following is the order of business for items to be heard no earlier than 6:30 p.m.

2. SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS

2.A. Proclamation: Juneteenth

2.B. City Manager Report

3. CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items will be considered and approved in one motion unless removed by a Councilmember for discussion.)

3.A. Approval of City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Order, and SCD License Agreement and Contract Modification
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Review, approve, and adopt the addendum changes to the City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2017111053), which analyzes environmental impacts of modifications to the City Yards Master Plan;

2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a license agreement and contract modification to Contract #9011 (CCS) with Southern California Disposal, to revise terms and conditions that will result in four years of recyclable materials transfer services through 2026;

3. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) fifth modification to Design-Build Contract #10371 (CCS) in the amount of $1,750,000 with Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Company for design and construction services of the Resource Recovery and Recycling Transfer Facility Relocation as part of the City Yards Modernization – Package A Project for the Public Works Department. This would result in a five-year amended agreement with a new total amount not to exceed $87,273,039; and

4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue any necessary change orders to complete additional work within contract authority.

3.B. Award Construction and Construction Management Contracts for Annual Water Main Replacement Project
City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 5 Recommended Action
Staff Recommends that the City Council:

1. Award Bid #2640 to Colich and Sons, LP, to provide construction services for the FY 2020/21 Annual Water Main Replacement Project for the Public Works Department;

2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with Colich and Sons, LP, in an amount not to exceed $6,530,160 (including a $851,760 contingency);

3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue any necessary change orders with Colich and Sons, LP. to complete additional work within contract authority;

3. Award Request for Proposal (RFP) #2640 to Willdan Engineering for construction management services for the FY 2020/21 Annual Water Main Replacement Project;

4. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Willdan Engineering in an amount not to exceed $396,750.

3.C. Award Construction and Construction Management Contracts for Annual Wastewater Main Replacement Project
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Award Bid #SP2638 to Steve Bubalo Construction Company to provide construction services for the FY 2020/21 Annual Wastewater Main Improvements Citywide Project (Project) for the Public Works Department;

2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Company in an amount not to exceed $4,103,895 (including a $535,290 contingency);

3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue any necessary change orders with Steve Bubalo Construction Company to complete additional work within contract authority;

4. Award RFP #SP2638 to Berg and Associates Inc. for construction management services for the Project;

5. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with Berg and Associates Inc. to provide construction management services for the Project in an amount not to exceed $230,000.

3.D. Adoption of Resolution Approving Olympic Restoration and Arcadia Expansion Project Mitigated Negative Declaration Second Addendum City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 6 Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt the attached resolution to approve the second addendum to the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Olympic Well Field Restoration and Arcadia Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project to relocate groundwater recharge well SM-11i to the City Yards, add a potential second groundwater recharge well at the City Yards, and replace the existing fence at the Arcadia Water Treatment Plant.

2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a first modification to Professional Services Agreement #10873 in the amount of $276,301 with GHD Inc. to provide additional owner’s engineer services and construction support services for the Public Works Department. This would result in a fiveyear amended agreement with a new total amount not to exceed $1,527,401, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

3.E. Approval of Contract Modification with Universal Protection Services, LP dba Allied Universal Security Services for Parking Structure Security Services Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a change order to purchase order #22101027 in the amount of $96,332 with Universal Protection Service, LP dba Allied Universal Security Services to provide parking structure security services for the Department of Transportation. This recommendation is made as an exception to the competitive bidding process pursuant to Section

2.24.250(g) and would result in a revised purchase order total not to exceed $339,132 with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval; and

2. Approve a cumulative total for Universal Protection Service, LP not to exceed $517,165 from December 1, 2018, through December 31, 2022.

3.F. Approval of Sixth Modification to Agreement 10667(CCS) with Siemen's for the Smart Building Commissioning (SBCx) of the Building Automation System (BAS)
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a sixth modification to agreement #10667(CCS) in the amount of $290,000 (includes a 10% contingency) with Siemens Industry Inc. (Siemens) to perform building optimization services for the Public Safety Facility (PSF), City Hall, and Main Library. This would result in a five-year contract with a new total amount not to exceed $1,505,847.

3.G. Approval of Third Modification to Agreement with BetterUp, Inc. for Care Program Support Services
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a third modification to agreement #11048 in the amount of $154,000 with BetterUp, Inc., to provide employee support services for one year, through June 30, 2023. This will result in a three-year amended agreement with a new total amount City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 7 not to exceed $446,500. This recommended award is made as an exception to the competitive bidding process pursuant to Section 2.24.250 (a) with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

3.H. Approval of Santa Monica Travel and Tourism Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget and Work Plan
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Santa Monica Tourism Marketing District Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget and Work Plan.

3.I. Approval of Pier Corporation Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget and Work Plan Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve the Santa Monica Pier Corporation Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget and Work Plan;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a third modification to agreement #10101 with the Santa Monica Pier Corporation to extend the term through June 30, 2023;

3. Authorize the one-day reduction of Carousel Ticket Fare Rate to 5 Cents on September 15, 2022, in conjunction with the Santa Monica Pier Carousel Centennial Celebration.

3.J. Approval of Fourth Contract Modification with Carahsoft/Granicus for Electronic Agenda Management Services
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a fourth modification to Agreement 9784 (CCS) in the amount of $23,190 with Carahsoft/Granicus for an agenda management software system for the Records and Election Services Department. This will result in a 1 year amended agreement with a new total amount not to exceed $188,614, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

3.K. Adoption of Resolution for AB 361 Findings Regarding Teleconference Meetings
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that Council adopt a resolution making the findings required by AB 361 to continue teleconference meetings of the City Council and City Boards, Commissions, and Task Forces through July 14, 2022.

3.L. Approval of Second Modification to Agreement with AdaptivEdge, LLC for data retention and classification label services - New item received 6/10/2022 Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to reinstate, negotiate and execute a second modification to agreement #3617 in the amount of $70,000 with AdaptivEdge, LLC for data retention and classification label services City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 8 for the Information Services Department. This will result in a four-year amended agreement with a new total amount not to exceed $148,355 with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

3.M. Approval of Second Modification to Professional Services Agreement with HR&A for 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element - New item received 6/10/2022
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a second modification to agreement #108300 (formerly #10830) in the amount of $89,000 and extend the term for one additional year, with HR&A Advisors Inc to Provide Additional Financial Analyses in Support of the City’s Housing Element. This will result in a four-year amended agreement with a new total amount not to exceed $418,900, with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.

3.N. City Council - Regular Meeting - May 10, 2022 5:30 PM - New item received 6/10/2022

3.O. City Council - Special Meeting - May 11, 2022 6:00 PM - New item received 6/10/2022

4. STUDY SESSION
No items

5. CONTINUED ITEMS
No items

6. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

6.A. Appeal of Landmarks Commission Decision to Designate 1665 Appian Way as a City Landmark
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve Appeal 21ENT-0253, appeal of the Landmarks Commission’s decision to designate the property located at 1665 Appian Way as a City Landmark; and

2. Deny Designation Application 21ENT-0067 to designate the property located at 1665 Appian Way as a Landmark or Structure of Merit.

3. If the City Council disapproves the appeal and approves the designation application to designate the property as either a City Landmark or Structure of Merit, as described in Alternative Actions, adopt the alternative findings under “California Environmental Quality Act Compliance”.

6.B. Appeal of Determination by Landmarks Commission to Designate 631 Colorado Avenue as a City Landmark
City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 9 Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve Appeal 22ENT-0015, appeal of the Landmarks Commission’s decision to designate the property located at 631 Colorado Avenue as a City Landmark; and

2. Deny Designation Application 21ENT-0125 to designate the property located at 631 Colorado Avenue as a Landmark or Structure of Merit.

7. ORDINANCES
(Public comment is permitted on ordinances for introduction and first reading. No public discussion is permitted on ordinances for second reading and adoption.)

7.A. Introduction and Adoption of Emergency Ordinance to Amend SMMC 7.16.020 Water Conservation Requirements - New item received 6/10/2022 Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Introduction and adoption of the attached emergency ordinance amending SMMC 7.16.020 on Water Conservation Requirements; and,

2. Obtain the City Council’s concurrence to implement Phase 2 Outdoor Water Restriction and limit outdoor watering to two (2) days per week.

8. STAFF ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS

8.A. Adoption of Resolutions related to the General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that City Council adopt two resolutions to:

1. Call for a General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022; and

2. Request that the Municipal Election be consolidated with the Los Angeles (LA) County Statewide General Election and request services from the LA County Registrar-Recorder for the General Municipal Election.

9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items

10. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
No items

11. RESOLUTIONS
No items
City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 10

12. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OTHER THAN REPORTS OF COMMISSION AND

OFFICERS
No items

13. COUNCILMEMBER DISCUSSION ITEMS

13.A. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Public Safety Reform and Oversight Commission for a term ending on 6/30/2024

13.B. On May 10, 2022, the City Council directed the City Manager to return with a study session as soon as practicable on various items (e.g.., municipal code changes, taxes, permitting process, etc.) that are necessary to be part of any future action taken by the City Council to allow for any business or businesses involved in the sale, delivery, themed special events, and/or consumption of nonmedicinal cannabis in the City of Santa Monica. This item is a request of Councilmembers Brock, de la Torre, and Negrete asking the City Manager and City Attorney to prepare an ordinance enacting a tax on businesses engaged in the sale, distribution, delivery, and consumption of cannabis. The ordinance shall be prepared in a timely manner for the City Council to consider placing the tax on the November 8, 2022 ballot. The tax should be structured as a general tax and have no sunset date.

Implementation of certain aspects of the cannabis tax will be contingent on future actions taken by City Council resulting from the study session referenced above. - New item received 6/10/2022

13.C. Request of Councilmembers Brock, de la Torre and Parra that the Council direct the City Manager to annually prepare and publish a Diversity Report enabling the City Council and the residents of Santa Monica to evaluate the diversity of the City's employees, and the hiring, promotion and firing of City employees during the previous year. The contemplated report should provide at a minimum, age, race and gender. To the extent possible, the City Manager shall also evaluate the potential to include other demographic data including, but not limited to, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and national origin. - New item received 6/10/2022
City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 11

13.D. Request of Councilmembers Brock, de la Torre and Parra for the City Attorney to return to City Council with an ordinance amending Section 2.24.080 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code limiting the City Attorney’s ability, without City Council approval, to enter into any contract providing for payment of any legal services for new legal matters at hourly rates in excess of the following: • $400 per hour for attorneys with at least ten years' experience engaged in the practice of law; • $300 per hour for attorneys with less than ten years' experience engaged in the practice of law; • $400 per hour for consultants and experts who are not attorneys and are not employees of any law firm; and • $300 per hour for all other consultants and experts, and all investigators.

The maximum hourly rates above shall be adjusted annually to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, United States city average, as published by the United States Department of Labor. Limited exceptions shall include specialized legal work, such as bonds, tax opinions, employment law, CEQA, environmental remediation, and water rights, in which the contract counsel will incur no more than twenty hours of work on the matter. - New item received 6/10/2022

13.E. Request of Councilmembers Brock, de la Torre and Parra that the Council direct the City Attorney to advise the City Council and provide options for consideration at the July 12, 2022 City Council meeting, including the appointment of independent special counsel, to handle litigation in which the City and one or more members of the City Council are named parties on opposite sides, so as to avoid the City Attorney being adverse to any member(s) of the City Council. - New item received 6/10/2022

13.F. Request of Councilmembers de la Torre and Brock that the City Manager explore and discuss with the California Coastal Commission what is needed to offer free parking in all beach parking lots for all residents who have a street parking permit in good standing. The City Manager will return to City Council with the results of those discussions along with any financial impacts. - New item received 6/10/2022

13.G. Request of Councilmembers Negrete and Parra and Mayor Pro Tem McCowan that the City Manager prepare a report pursuant to Section 9212 of the California Elections Code on an initiative with the following title prepared by the City Attorney that is seeking to qualify and be placed on the November 8, 2022 ballot: AN INITIATIVE MEASURE TO ESTABLISH ADDED FUNDING FOR

HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION, AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND SCHOOLS BY AMENDING SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6.96 TO PROVIDE A

THIRD TIER TRANSFER TAX RATE FOR PROPERTY TRANSFERS OF
$8,000,000 OR MORE WITH AN ELEVEN MEMBER RESIDENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE The report prepared pursuant to Section 9212 of the California Elections Code shall be presented to City Council as soon as possible, but not later than July 26, 2022. - New item received 6/10/2022 City of Santa Monica Generated: 6/14/2022 2:09 PM Page 12

14. PUBLIC INPUT
(Public comment is permitted only on items not on the agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. State law prohibits the City Council from taking any action on items not listed on the agenda, including issues raised under this agenda item.)

14.A. 14. Written Public Input

ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and reports are accessible on the City's webpage at www.smgov.net/council/agendas. They are also available at the City Clerk's Office and in alternate formats upon request. For a free email subscription to the City Council Agendas, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (310) 458-8211 or [email protected].

Members of the public unable to attend a meeting but wishing to comment on an item(s) listed on the agenda may submit written comments prior to the meeting by meeting by mailing them to: City Clerk, 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401 or to [email protected]. Written comments received from the public by 2 PM on the day of the City Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to the meeting and posted online.

City Hall and the Council Chamber are wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations (i.e. sign language interpreting, access to an amplified sound system, etc.), please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (310) 458-8211 or TDD: (310) 917-6626 at least 3 days prior to the scheduled meeting.

Si desea comunicarse con alguien en español, llame a nuestra oficina al (310) 458-8211 y pida hablar con Esterlina Lugo.

Santa Monica Blue Bus Lines #2, #3, #5, #9 and the EXPO Line serve City Hall. Parking is available on Main Street, on Olympic Drive, and in the Civic Center Parking Structure (validation free).

City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: June 14, 2022
Agenda Item: 1.C
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Douglas Sloan, City Attorney, City Attorney's Office, Administration Subject: Conference with Labor Negotiator: Government Code Section 54957.6 -- Agency Designated Representatives: City Manager David White and Chief People Officer Lori Gentles; Bargaining Units: ATA-Administrative Team Associates; IBT-California Teamsters Local 911; FEMA-Santa Monica Fire Executive Management Association; FIRE-Santa Monica Firefighters Local 1109 IAFF; MEA-Municipal Employees Association; AFSCME Local 4819, Management Team Association; PALSSU-Public Attorneys’ Legal Support Staff Union; PAU- Public Attorneys Union; POA-Santa Monica Police Officer Association; SMART TD-The International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Division, Local 1785; STA- Supervisory Team Associates; Coalition of Santa Monica City Employees.

Prepared By: Bradley Michaud, Legal Operations Coordinator Approved Forwarded to Council

1.C
Packet Pg. 13
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: June 14, 2022
Agenda Item: 2.A
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, City Clerk, Special Agenda Items Subject: Proclamation: Juneteenth
Prepared By: Stephanie Venegas, Council Office & Legislative Affairs Liaison Approved Forwarded to Council

2.A
Packet Pg. 14
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: June 14, 2022
Agenda Item: 2.B
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, City Clerk, Special Agenda Items Subject: City Manager Report
Prepared By: Christopher Smith, Assistant to the City Manager Approved Forwarded to Council

2.B
Packet Pg. 15
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: June 14, 2022
Agenda Item: 3.A
1 of 10
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Valte, Public Works Director, Public Works, Resource Recovery & Recycling
Subject: Approval of City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Order, and SCD License Agreement and Contract Modification
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

4. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue any necessary change orders to complete additional work within contract authority.

Executive Summary
The City Yards Master Plan aims to modernize the aging operations and facilities at the City Yards. On October 25, 2016, City Council approved a design-build contract with Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Company (HDCC) for the first phase of the City Yards Master Plan, referenced as “Package A” (Attachment A). The City’s Planning Commission certified the City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR)

3.A
Packet Pg. 16
2 of 10
and approved the Development Review Permit for Package A on December 12, 2018.

Since then, the project has undergone several modifications to accommodate various design and construction service needs (Attachment B). The change discussed in this report focuses on the relocation of the City’s recyclable materials tip and transfer facility to the Hanson and Southern California Disposal (SCD) lots, which necessitates an addendum to the project’s EIR, a change order with HDCC, and a license agreement and contract modification with SCD.

Discussion
Located at 2500 Michigan Avenue, the 14.7-acre Santa Monica City Yards operates seven days a week and houses the City’s Facilities Maintenance Division, Resource Recovery and Recycling (RRR) Division, Street Services Division, Fleet Maintenance Division, Traffic Operations Division, Water Resources Division, and the Fire Department Training Facility.

Recycling Operations
For the discussion in this report, it is important to explain the three components of the City RRR Division’s solid waste management operations:
• Collection –RRR drivers operate automated and semi-automated trucks to collect solid waste materials from curbside containers residents and businesses set out on collection days.
• Tip and Transfer – The City contracts with SCD, which operates a private transfer station located next to the City Yards, for solid waste transfer services.

After collection, RRR drivers unload solid waste materials from their trucks onto a tipping floor, and the waste is reloaded by SCD workers onto large hauling trailers and transferred to different destinations based on material type. • Processing and Disposal – SCD hauls the materials to the City’s various contracted processing and disposal facilities. Landfill trash is transferred to a landfill for disposal. Organics are transferred to specialized facilities where the materials are processed and transformed into compost, mulch, or renewable

3.A
Packet Pg. 17
3 of 10
energy. Recyclable materials are transferred to recycling plants where they are sorted, processed, and marketed to manufacturers.

Before 2019
Prior to 2019, the City contracted with Allan Company to operate the former Santa Monica Community Recycling Center (Recycling Center), located at 2411 Delaware Avenue at the southernmost portion of the City Yards. The Recycling Center served two purposes: 1) allow the public to recycle items such as beverage containers and scrap metal and redeem for cash; and 2) provide on-site processing of the City’s curbside recyclable materials. Prior to 2019, RRR drivers collected the curbside blue-bin recyclable materials and delivered them directly to the Recycling Center for on-site processing at the City Yards, bypassing the need for SCD’s transfer services. 2019 to 2022
The Recycling Center that sorted and processed recyclable materials within the City Yards closed in June 2019. From July 2019 through August 2021, RRR drivers would tip recyclable materials in an area at the City Yards south of the Fire Department Training Facility, while SCD would transfer the materials to various recycling plants for processing. In preparation for the Fire Training Facility Expansion phase of the City Yards Modernization Project, this tip and transfer operation ceased in 2021. As an interim solution, RRR drivers have been delivering the collected curbside recyclable materials to the Culver City Transfer and Recycling Station for tip and transfer services, which is 6.5 miles outside of the City and costs approximately $15,000 more per month or over $179,000 per year (Attachment C). The interim agreement with the City of Culver City is temporary until a new permanent tip and transfer area in the City Yards could be identified, the environmental impact analyses are completed, and a long-term agreement with SCD is negotiated.
2022 and Going Forward
Staff identified a viable site for a permanent tip and transfer facility utilizing the southeast corner of the City Yards, known as the Hanson Lot, combined with a

3.A
Packet Pg. 18
4 of 10
trapezoidal portion of the SCD Transfer Station (SCD Lot). Together, they are labeled as “Relocated Transfer Facility” on the maps below (Attachment D).

3.A
Packet Pg. 19
5 of 10

3.A
Packet Pg. 20
6 of 10
The Hanson Lot (owned by the City) is approximately 22,500 square feet and the SCD Lot (owned by SCD) is approximately 18,442 square feet for a combined area of 40,942 square feet for the proposed transfer facility.

Under this plan, the two lots would remain under separate ownership but used complementarily. The SCD Lot would be primarily used for tipping, loading, and transferring of curbside recyclable materials, while the Hanson Lot would be utilized for equipment storage, truck queueing, as well as accepting, loading, and storing of construction and demolition materials and large recyclable items. Tip and transfer activities may occur in the Hanson Lot in the future.

In the proposed plan, RRR drivers would enter the SCD Lot and tip the curbside recyclable materials from their collection trucks onto the tipping floor. SCD workers would pick up the materials with equipment, load them into hauling trailers, and transfer the loads to recyclable materials processing facilities. Meanwhile, SCD would use the Hanson Lot to store equipment; as a staging area for its hauling trailers to line up while waiting to load; and to accept and store recyclable construction and demolition materials and other large recyclable items brought in by self-haulers, RRR bulky item cleanup crews, and City crews working on street and water capital improvement projects. The Hanson Lot would provide enough space for SCD workers to separate bulky recyclable materials such as dirt, concrete, and mattresses into different piles for better transfer operation handling. Together, the combined traffic for both lots is estimated at 10 to 15 vehicle trips per day.

The proposed relocation of the transfer facility would involve re-grading and re-paving approximately 22,500 square feet of the city-owned Hanson Lot to allow drainage and circulation to the surrounding area. A 150-foot-long and 12-foot-high acoustical K-Rail barrier-mounted sound wall would also be constructed to extend from the existing sound wall on the SCD Lot to help mitigate noise. New trees would be planted to the east of the sound wall as an additional visual and sound barrier. The fire lane that is used to traverse the area will be relocated to the north as part of Phase One of the City Yards Modernization project. Finally, chain link fencing and gates would be installed along the

3.A
Packet Pg. 21
7 of 10
northern and western edges to ensure security. No construction activities will occur on the SCD lot as that lot is already equipped with an existing sound wall.

Environmental Review
The relocation of the transfer facility was not previously assessed in the City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) [SCH No. 2017111053]. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline 15164(a), a lead agency must prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guideline 15162; calling for preparation of an EIR have occurred (i.e. substantial changes that involve new significant environmental effects or substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant effects, substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project was undertaken, or new information of substantial importance that was not known at the time the previous EIR was certified).

Accordingly, in November 2021 the City retained Dudek, the environmental consulting firm that prepared the certified City Yards Master Plan EIR, to analyze the environmental impacts of the following proposed activities:

1. Relocation of the transfer facility;

2. Construction of sound wall on the Hanson Lot to extend from the existing sound wall on the SCD Lot; and

3. Relocation of the fire lane that currently bisects the Hanson Lot to a location that connects to the fire access gate at the mobile home park.

Dudek completed its analyses in March 2022 and detailed its findings in the Addendum Changes to the City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (Attachment E).

Dudek analyzed a list of 22 environmental factors as required by the CEQA, including air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, neighborhood effects, noise, and traffic transportation, among others. In summary, the proposed transfer facility and associated changes to the City Yards Master Plan would not constitute a substantial change in the City Yards Master Plan Project nor would it result in a new or greater environmental

3.A
Packet Pg. 22
8 of 10
impact. With the extension of a sound wall, the proposed transfer activities from both the Hanson and SCD Lots would not exceed the City’s noise ordinance.

In light of these proposed minor modifications to the City Yards Master Plan, an Addendum is appropriate because none of the conditions described in CEQA Guideline 15162 have occurred which would warrant preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR. Based on the analysis in the Addendum, the proposed revisions to the City Yards Master Plan would not result in new or substantially more significant environmental effects than were identified in the EIR and would not require new mitigation measures than were already required by the EIR.

Public Input
CEQA does not legally require a public hearing for addendums to the EIR. However, the City chose to inform all property owners located within a 750-foot radius of the proposed project site. On February 4, 2022, the City mailed a Notice of Availability to 888 residential and commercial property owners and posted the Addendum on its website at https://www.smgov.net/Departments/PCD/Environmental-Reports/City-Yards-ProjectEIR/. Additionally, the City made available a 30-day public review and comment period between February 2 – March 6, 2022. Three public comments were received. Those comments and the City’s responses were included in the Addendum.

Next Steps
HDCC is currently constructing Phases 2 and 4 of the City Yards Modernization Project and will complete the relocation of the transfer facility concurrently. Staff anticipates completion of this additional scope about eight weeks after Council approval.

Additionally, since the proposed transfer facility involves both City property (Hanson Lot) and private property (SCD Lot), a contract modification of Contract #9011 (CCS) with SCD is required to incorporate a license agreement to memorialize the terms, conditions, and authorized usage of both lots for transfer services of recyclable materials. This contract modification for transfer services of recyclable materials would expire in four years, in 2026, to align with the expiration date of the existing SCD

3.A
Packet Pg. 23
9 of 10
contract, which encompasses transfer services of landfill trash, organics, and City generated construction and demolition materials (Attachments F). Pursuant to contract terms, staff is required to meet with SCD to discuss the other services mentioned above by December 1, 2022, followed by a written notification expressing the City’s intent to exercise the contract’s renewal options by December 1, 2025. Staff will begin the negotiations process later this year and return to Council before 2025 for contract renewal approval and any necessary budget actions.

The proposed cost for recyclable materials transfer services is estimated at approximately $3.5 million over four years, which is more cost-effective than RRR drivers continuing to transport recyclable materials to Culver City based on staff analysis. The cost is deemed reasonable considering Santa Monica’s geographical distance from recyclable materials processing facilities. The estimated cost would be absorbed by the existing Council authorized amount for the SCD contract #9011 (CCS).

No budget action would be required at this time.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
10/25/2016
(Attachment A)
Award Design Contract for the City Yards Modernization Project 5/28/2019
(Attachment C)
Closure of Recycling Center
6/6/2021
(Attachment D)
Interim Recyclable Materials Transfer Services Contract with Culver City
Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
Staff seeks authority to approve funding from the RRR Fund to increase the amount of the GMP agreement with HDCC for design and construction services for the relocation of the transfer facility included in the City Yards Modernization Project Package A.

Funds are available in the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program Budget in the RRR Fund.

3.A
Packet Pg. 24
10 of 10
Agreement Modification Request
Agreement # Current
Authorized
Amount
FY 2021-22
Modified
Request Amount
Budget
CIP Account #
Total Revised
Contract Amount
10371 $0 $1,750,000 C5408070.689000 $1,750,000
10371 $48,426,082 $0 C0105410.689000 $48,426,082
10371 $19,148,100 $0 C0105410.689720 $19,148,100
10371 $7,406,100 $0 C5005410.689410 $7,406,100
10371 $1,084,600 $0 C5105410.689000 $1,084,600
10371 $60,300 $0 C7505410.689000 $60,300
10371 $1,500,000 $0 C7007720.689000 $1,500,000
10371 $650,000 $0 C5104870.689000 $650,000
10371 $372,857 $0 C2006830.689000 $372,857
10371 $6,350,000 $0 C0107500.689000 $6,350,000
10371 $200,000 $0 C0104580.689000 $200,000
10371 $325,000 $0 01500020.52914C $325,000
$85,523,039 $1,750,000 Total $87,273,039
Prepared By: Yvonne Yeung, Resource Recovery and Recycling Administrator Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:

A. Staff Report - October 25, 2016 (Web Link)
B. HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard C. Staff Report - June 6, 2021 (Web Link)
D. Proposed Relocated Transfer Facility Site Maps
E. City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum F. SCD Contract and Modifications for Solid Waste Transfer Services G. Oaks Form - Hathaway Dinwiddie
H. Oaks Form - SCD
I. Written Comments

3.A
Packet Pg. 25

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change FIRST AMENDMENT TO DESIGN/BUILD AGREEMENT NO. 10371 (CCS) This First Amendment to Design/Build Agreement No. 10371 (CCS) (“First Amendment”), is entered into as of _________________ (“Execution Date”), by and between the City of Santa Monica, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Company (“Design/Builder”), and is made with reference to the following:

RECITALS
A. On or about September 27, 2018, the City and Design/Builder entered into a Design-Build Agreement No. 10371 (CCS) (“Agreement”) for the design and construction of the City Yards Modernization Project.

B. The City and Design/Builder desire to enter into this First Amendment to establish a Guaranteed Maximum Price (“GMP1”) for the Foundation Only portion City Yards Modernization Project (“GMP1 Scope”) under the terms and conditions set forth herein.

C. The City and Design/Builder agree that notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, nothing in this First Amendment shall commit the City to pay for or entitle Design/Builder to receive any compensation for the Project other than for GMP1 Scope until such time as the City and Design/Builder agree upon and execute a Second Amendment to establish a Guaranteed Maximum Price (“GMP2”) for the construction portion of the Project (“GMP2 Scope”).

D. The City and Design/Builder understand and agree that “Package A” in this First Amendment is a collective reference to GMP1 Scope and GMP2 Scope (all above ground work not included in GMP1).

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as follows:

1. Recitals. The City and Design/Builder agree that the above Recitals are true and correct and incorporated into the terms and conditions of this First Amendment.

2. Construction Documents. A list of Construction Documents for GMP1 Scope is attached hereto as Exhibit A-1. All references in this First Amendment, General Conditions, and General Requirements to the Preliminary Design Documents shall henceforth be understood to refer to the new list of Drawings, Specifications, and Reports attached hereto as Exhibit A-1. The City and DocuSign Envelope ID: 2ED05FCC-BD76-40B0-B5C1-FE39F4E1668A 8/27/2019

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Design/Builder agree that GMP1 Scope is limited to the Work set forth in the plans and drawings listed in Exhibit A-1.

3. Contract Price. The Contract Price for this First Amendment shall consist of:
(i) the Preconstruction GMP amount previously authorized in the Agreement in the amount of EIGHT MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO
THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY-SEVEN DOLLARS ($8,562,857); plus (ii) GMP1 authorized by this First Amendment for GMP1 Scope in the amount of THIRTY-SIX MILLION NINE HUNDRED AND NINETY-NINE THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTEEN DOLLARS ($36,999,818).

4. Schedule of Values. The agreed Schedule of Values for GMP1 and GMP1 Scope shall be as set forth in Exhibit D-1.

5. Design/Builder Qualifications. The Contract Price is conditioned on and subject to the Exceptions, Qualifications, Exclusions attached hereto in Exhibit D-1.

6. Construction Schedule. The updated construction schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit C-1.

7. City Representative. Section 1.9 of the Agreement (City Representative) is hereby amended by replacing the name “Rebecca Abano” with the name “Christopher Dishlip.”

8. Construction Contingency. Section 2.4.1 of the Agreement (Design/Builder Contingency) is hereby amended by deleting and replacing the first sentence of the text in Section 2.4.1 with the following sentence:

The Construction GMP shall include a 5% contingency
(Design/Builder Contingency)
Section 2.4.3 of Agreement (City Contingency) is hereby amended by deleting and replacing the first sentence of the text in Section 2.4.3 with the following sentence:

The Construction GMP shall include a 0% contingency (City Contingency)

9. Contract Time. Section 3.3.2 of the Agreement (Construction Phase) is hereby amended by deleting and replacing all of the text in Section 3.3.2 with the following sentence:

Design/Builder shall achieve Substantial Completion of the Work for Package A within One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty (1,250) Days after City’s issuance of a Construction Notice to Proceed.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this provision shall only take effect in the event that the City and Design/Builder execute a Second Amendment for GMP2 and GMP2 Scope.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2ED05FCC-BD76-40B0-B5C1-FE39F4E1668A

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

10. Compensable Delay. Section 3.5.2.1 of the Agreement (Damages to Contractor) is hereby amended by deleting and replacing the first sentence of the text in Section 3.5.2.1 with the following sentence:

Subject to Section 3.5.1 and provided that the City and Design/Builder execute a Second Amendment for GMP2 and
GMP2 Scope, the Contract Price shall be increased by the fixed amount of TWENTY-ONE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED
THIRTEEN DOLLARS ($21,213) ("Compensable Delay Rate")
for each Day of extension to the Contract Time for Substantial Completion of the Work that Design/Builder is entitled to be granted under the terms of this Agreement and the General Conditions due to Compensable Delay occurring after execution of this Agreement and prior to Substantial Completion and affecting Substantial Completion of the Work, but only to the extent that the Compensable Delay is not concurrent with (1) an Inexcusable Delay or (2) another Excusable Delay that is not also a Compensable Delay.

11. Liquidated Damages to the City. Section 3.6 of the Agreement (Liquidated Damages to the City) is hereby amended by deleting and replacing all of the text in Section 3.6 with the following paragraph:

IF DESIGN/BUILDER FAILS TO ACHIEVE SUBSTANTIAL

COMPLETION OF THE WORK WITHIN THE CONTRACT
TIME REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3.3.2 OF THIS

AGREEMENT (AS ADJUSTED BY CHANGE ORDER FOR

EXTENSIONS PERMITTED BY THE CONTRACT

DOCUMENTS), CITY WILL INCUR DAMAGES, THE

AMOUNT OF WHICH WILL BE DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE

TO ESTABLISH WITH CERTAINTY, INCLUDING BUT NOT

LIMITED TO INEFFICIENCY AND DISRUPTION OF CITY'S
OPERATIONS. THE PARTIES THEREFORE AGREE THAT

FOR EACH DAY PAST THE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
DATE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3.3.2 (AS ADJUSTED

BY CHANGE ORDER FOR THE EXTENSIONS PERMITTED

BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS) THAT THE WORK IS

NOT SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE, DESIGN/BUILDER

SHALL PAY CITY THE SUM OF FIVE THOUSAND, SEVEN
HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR DOLLARS ($5,774) PER DAY
AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. THIS SUM REPRESENTS A

REASONABLE EFFORT TO ESTIMATE FAIR

COMPENSATION FOR THE FORESEEABLE LOSSES CITY

WILL INCUR ON ACCOUNT OF DELAYS IN SUBSTANTIAL
COMPLETION OF THE WORK AND IS NOT A PENALTY.

NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY

HEREIN, THIS PROVISION SHALL ONLY TAKE EFFECT IN
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2ED05FCC-BD76-40B0-B5C1-FE39F4E1668A

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

THE EVENT THAT THE CITY AND DESIGN/BUILDER
EXECUTE A SECOND AMENDMENT FOR GMP2 AND GMP2
SCOPE.

12. Self-Performed Work. Section 4.5.5 of the Agreement (Self-Performed Work) is hereby amended by deleting and replacing all of the text in Section 4.5.5 with the
following paragraph:

No portions of the Work shall be self-performed or proposed to be self-performed by Design/Builder without prior Approval by City, which may be granted or withheld in City’s sole discretion.

Requests for Approval by City of self-performed Work shall be accompanied by documentation demonstrating (i) that
Design/Builder has the capability and experience to self-perform the scope of Work proposed to be self-performed by
Design/Builder and (ii) the cost savings to the Project, as evidenced by, without limitation, competitive prices from at least three (3) trade subcontractors for the scope of Work proposed to be self-performed by Design/Builder and (iii) a proposed lump sum price for Work to be self-performed by Design/Builder.

Submission of a lump sum proposal to self-perform Work
constitutes a representation and binding commitment by
Design/Builder that if requested by City it will perform such Work for the lump sum price proposed. Provided that the City, in its sole discretion, approves the amount as competitive, the Design/Builder may self-perform the cast-in-place concrete portion of the Work for a fixed, lump sum price of Four Million, Four Hundred Nineteen Thousand, Eight Hundred Fourteen
Dollars ($4,419,814); provided, however, that in consideration of the City’s so agreeing, the Design/Builder agrees that
notwithstanding anything else stated in the Contract Documents to the contrary, Design/Builder guarantees that the Costs of Work to complete said portion of the Work shall not exceed the agreed lump sum price set forth herein and that any Costs of Work incurred in excess thereof in performance of the cast-in-place concrete portion of the Work, whether incurred by Design/Builder or others, shall be borne by Design/Builder at its own expense, not as a Cost of Work and shall not be reimbursed in any form by City, including, without limitation, from Contingency. Said guaranteed lump sum price for the cast-in-place concrete portion of the Work shall only be adjusted for deletions or Scope Changes to the concrete portion of the Work authorized by Change Order.

13. Labor Costs. Section 6.1.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting and replacing the last sentence of the text in Section 6.1.2 with the following sentence:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2ED05FCC-BD76-40B0-B5C1-FE39F4E1668A

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change The cost of those services is estimated to be SIX MILLION, NINE

HUNDRED NINETY-TWO THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED
THIRTY-SIX DOLLARS ($6,992,336), through the construction phase of City Yards Modernization Project. This amount is included within the General Conditions line item of the Schedule of Values in Exhibit D-1 and includes the time for the key personnel listed in Exhibit B-1 at the updated wage rates spelled out in Exhibit E-1.

Section 6.1.3 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting and replacing the first sentence of the text in Section 6.1.3 with the following sentence:

Design/Builder acknowledges and agrees that the amount
authorized for General Conditions in Section 6.1.2 includes taxes, insurance, contributions, assessments and benefits required by law or collective bargaining agreements, and, for personnel not covered by such agreements, customary benefits such as sick leave and medical and health benefits and shall all be included as part of the fully-burdened updated wage rates spelled out in Exhibit E-1. No additional compensation for these staff members shall be considered.

14. Design/Builder Fee. Section 9.0 of the Agreement (Design/Builder Fee) is hereby amended by deleting and replacing all text in Section 9.0 with the text below:

The Contract Price includes the Design/Builder's Fee. The Design/Builder's Fee (detailed in Exhibit D-1) for the performance of Work includes the following mark-ups for the Construction Phase of the City Yards Modernization Project:

ITEM MARK-UP
All insurance 1.00%
All permit fees 2.95%
Cost(s) of Work performed by the
Design Professionals after GMP
Amendments, reimbursable by
City

2.95%
Cost(s) of Work performed by the
Trade Contractors after GMP
Amendments, excluding all
permit fees reimbursable by City.

2.95%

15. Bonds. Section 12.3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting and replacing the first sentence of the text in Section 12.3.1 with the following sentence:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2ED05FCC-BD76-40B0-B5C1-FE39F4E1668A

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Prior to commencing any construction of the Work,
Design/Builder shall file with City a good and sufficient labor and material payment bond (Payment Bond) and performance bond (Performance Bond) in the amount of no less than THIRTY-SIX

MILLION NINE HUNDRED AND NINETY-NINE

THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTEEN DOLLARS
($36,999,818).

16. Notices. Section 16.2 of the Agreement (Addresses) is hereby amended by replacing the name “Rebecca Abano” with the name “Christopher Dishlip.”

17. Familiarity with Project Site Conditions. Section 5.1 of the General Conditions is hereby deleted.

18. Differing Site Conditions. Section 7.6.2 of the General Conditions is hereby amended by deleting and replacing the first sentence of the text in Section 7.6.2 with the following sentence:

Differing Site Conditions are those conditions, located at the Site or in Existing Improvements encountered by Design/Builder that constitute:

19. List of Exhibits. The following list of Exhibits are attached to this First GMP Amendment and incorporated herein and into the Agreement by this reference:

Exhibit 1: Oaks Initiative Disclosure Form dated 04/16/2019 Exhibit 2: Living Wage Ordinance Certification – Not Applicable Exhibit 3: Insurance dated 07/19/2019
Exhibit 4: Performance Bond dated 07/12/2019
Exhibit 5: Prevailing Wage Job Notice and Acknowledgement Forms Exhibit A-1: Construction Documents dated 05/16/2019
Exhibit B-1: Key Personnel – Construction dated 07/01/2019 Exhibit C-1: Updated Project Schedule dated 05/13/2019 & Logistics/Construction Mitigation Impact Plan dated 06/12/2019 Exhibit D-1: Schedule of Values, Qualifications and Exceptions through Construction of underground/foundation work on the City Yards Modernization – Package A dated 06/03/2019
Exhibit E-1: Updated Wage Rates dated 07/01/2019
Exhibit F-1: Sub-contractor Agreement form dated 07/01/2019 ///
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2ED05FCC-BD76-40B0-B5C1-FE39F4E1668A

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

20. Agreement in Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly modified by this First Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

In witness whereof, the City and Design/Builder have executed this First Amendment as of the date and year first written above.

ATTEST:
______________________________

DENISE ANDERSON-WARREN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________

LANE DILG
City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,
a municipal corporation
By: ____________________________

RICK COLE
City Manager
ABC Corporation
#VENDOR
By: ____________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2ED05FCC-BD76-40B0-B5C1-FE39F4E1668A 8/26/2019
Lane Dilg
City Attorney
Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Company
Sr. Vice President
Rashmi Mehta
8/26/2019
City Manager
Rick Cole
8/27/2019
Denise Anderson-Warren
City Clerk
8/28/2019

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Request Date:

Contract Information
10371 (CCS)
Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Dinwiddie Constru
City Yards ModernizationͲPackage A SP2396
PROPOSED CHANGES:See Exhibit A for details.

Contractor: Contractor's Vendor # 360339
Project: Project #
Project Manager: Sebastian Felbeck Division: Architecture Services City of Santa Monica 4/21/20

CHANGE ORDER
Contract # Change Order (CO) # Council Approval Date: 12/10/19 CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT $
I. CONTRACT SUMMARY
A. Original contract amount: $
B. Previous Change Orders $
C. This Change Order $
D. New contract amount $
II. OFFSITE WORK SUMMARY
(Total cumulative dollar amount of all offsite work may not exceed $100,000) A. Amount of this CO that is for offsite work: $
B. Total cumulative amount of all offsite work after this CO: $ III. SCHEDULE SUMMARY
A. Original contract start date
B. Original completion date
C. Duration of original contract (calendar days)
D. Previously adjusted completion date
E. Number of days the contract will be extended by this CO:

F. The date of Substantial Completion as of this CO:

IV. ACCOUNT ALLOCATIONS
Account Number: $
Account Number: C0105410.689000 $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Amount of this Change Order: $

0.00 28,100,182.00
73,662,857.00
45,562,675.00
28,100,182.00
C7007720.689000 1,500,000.00
C5104870.689000 650,000.00
C7505410.689000 60,300.00
C5105410.689000 1,084,600.00
C0105410.689720 16,148,100.00
C5005410.689000 7,406,100.00
12/2/2022
1,251,082.00
28,100,182.00

0.00 0.00
7/1/2019
12/2/2022
1250
12/2/2022
0

Page 1 ends

*/%#))0!'*+!

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Request Date:

Contract Information
10371 (CCS)
Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction Dinwiddie Constru
City Yards ModernizationͲPackage A SP2396
PROPOSED CHANGES:See Exhibit A for details.

Contractor: Contractor's Vendor # 360339
Project: Project #
Project Manager: Sebastian Felbeck Division: Architecture Services City of Santa Monica 4/21/20

CHANGE ORDER
Contract # Change Order (CO) # Council Approval Date: 12/10/19 V. APPROVALS
Date Date
Date Date
Date
OPTIONALͲClient Department Representative
FUNDS AVAILABILITY CERTIFICATION:

Date
#DIVISIONHEAD #PWDIRECTOR
#CLIENTDEPARTMENT
#FINANCE
The signing of a Change Order indicates that the parties have reached a full resolution, settlement and accord, and satisfaction with respect to all claims for cost and extensions of time that were asserted, or that could have been asserted, whether known or unknown at the time of execution of the Change Order, and that are related to the subject matter of the Change Order, including without limitation all claims, costs or damages for delay, disruption, hindrance, interference, extended or extraordinary direct and indirect overhead, multiplicity of Changes, loss of productivity labor or material cost escalations, inefficiency, the "impact" of the Change on the Work, legal expenses, consultant costs, interest, lost profits or revenue, bond or insurance costs, currency fluctuations, changes in taxes or other related claims, costs or damages, and all Compensable Delay costs associated with this change. #PM #CONTRACTOR

Page 2 ends

*/%#))0!'*+!

-.%
)!'
!&
,*)-.,/.%*)
)
#!, ,%!,!-% !).

-$(%!$.

+%.
',*#,
(
)
#!,

$,%-.*+$!,%-$'%+ /-
)'%)!

%,!.*,*"/
'%
*,&-
*).,
.-**, %)
.*,
*$)
,,1

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Request Date:

Contract Information
10371 (CCS) 2
Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction
City Yards Modernization - Package A SP2396
PROPOSED CHANGES: See Exhibit A for details.

Project Manager: Sebastian Felbeck Division: Architecture Services City of Santa Monica 9/2/21

CHANGE ORDER
Contract # Change Order (CO) # Council Approval Date: 4/27/21 Contractor: Contractor's Vendor # 360339
Project: Project #
CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT $
I. CONTRACT SUMMARY
A. Original contract amount: $
B. Previous Change Orders $
C. This Change Order $
D. New contract amount $
II. OFFSITE WORK SUMMARY
(Total cumulative dollar amount of all offsite work may not exceed $100,000) A. Amount of this CO that is for offsite work: $
B. Total cumulative amount of all offsite work after this CO: $ III. SCHEDULE SUMMARY
A. Original contract start date
B. Original completion date
C. Duration of original contract (calendar days)
D. Previously adjusted completion date
E. Number of days the contract will be extended by this CO:

F. The date of Substantial Completion as of this CO:

IV. ACCOUNT ALLOCATIONS
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Amount of this Change Order: $
12/2/2022
6,750,869.00

0.00 0.00
7/1/2019
12/2/2022
1250
12/2/2022
0 C0107500.689000 6,350,000.00
C0105410.689000 400,869.00
28,100,182.00
6,750,869.00
80,413,726.00
45,562,675.00
6,750,869.00

Page 2 of 3 ends

+ 0&$**1"(+,"

3.A.b
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Order, and SCD License Agreement) Request Date:

Contract Information
10371 (CCS) 2
Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction
City Yards Modernization - Package A SP2396
PROPOSED CHANGES: See Exhibit A for details.

Project Manager: Sebastian Felbeck Division: Architecture Services City of Santa Monica 9/2/21

CHANGE ORDER
Contract # Change Order (CO) # Council Approval Date: 4/27/21 Contractor: Contractor's Vendor # 360339
Project: Project #
V. APPROVALS
Date Date
Date Date
Date
OPTIONAL - Client Department Representative
FUNDS AVAILABILITY CERTIFICATION:

Page 1 of 3 ends

+ 0&$**1"(+,"

"
./&
*"(" '
-+*./-0 /&+*
*
$"-

/%
2 3&*2&!!&"+*./-0 /&+*

-
& "-".&!"*/

,&/
(-+$-
)$-

%-&./+,%"-&.%(&,
/&*$&-" /+-+#0(&
+-'.

& '

(/"
-+ 0-")"*/
*
$"-
-
"(&.,
-4

3.A.b
Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Order, and SCD License Agreement) Request Date:

Contract Information
10371 (CCS) 3
Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction
City Yards Modernization - Package A SP2396
PROPOSED CHANGES: See Exhibit A for details.

Contractor: Contractor's Vendor # 360339
Project: Project #
City of Santa Monica 3/7/22

CHANGE ORDER
Contract # Change Order (CO) # Council Approval Date: 10/12/21 Project Manager: Sebastian Felbeck Division: Architecture Services CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT $
I. CONTRACT SUMMARY
A. Original contract amount: $
B. Previous Change Orders $
C. This Change Order $
D. New contract amount $
II. OFFSITE WORK SUMMARY
(Total cumulative dollar amount of all offsite work may not exceed $100,000) A. Amount of this CO that is for offsite work: $
B. Total cumulative amount of all offsite work after this CO: $ III. SCHEDULE SUMMARY
A. Original contract start date
B. Original completion date
C. Duration of original contract (calendar days)
D. Previously adjusted completion date
E. Number of days the contract will be extended by this CO:

F. The date of Substantial Completion as of this CO:

IV. ACCOUNT ALLOCATIONS
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Account Number: $
Amount of this Change Order: $
34,851,051.00
3,300,000.00
83,713,726.00
45,562,675.00
3,300,000.00
C0105410.689720 3,000,000.00
C0104580.689000 200,000.00
01500020.52914C 100,000.00
12/2/2022
3,300,000.00

0.00 0.00
7/1/2019
12/2/2022
1250
12/2/2022
0

Page 1 of 3 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7D119C48-BCFC-45FF-8884-643C23F7D735

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Request Date:

Contract Information
10371 (CCS) 3
Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction
City Yards Modernization - Package A SP2396
PROPOSED CHANGES: See Exhibit A for details.

Contractor: Contractor's Vendor # 360339
Project: Project #
City of Santa Monica 3/7/22

CHANGE ORDER
Contract # Change Order (CO) # Council Approval Date: 10/12/21 Project Manager: Sebastian Felbeck Division: Architecture Services V. APPROVALS
Date Date
Sr. Construction Manager HDCC Sr. Vice President
Date Date
Capital Program Manager Director of Public Works
FUNDS AVAILABILITY CERTIFICATION:

Date
Christopher Dishlip Rick Valte
Araceli Esparza
The signing of a Change Order indicates that the parties have reached a full resolution, settlement and accord, and satisfaction with respect to all claims for cost and extensions of time that were asserted, or that could have been asserted, whether known or unknown at the time of execution of the Change Order, and that are related to the subject matter of the Change Order, including without limitation all claims, costs or damages for delay, disruption, hindrance, interference, extended or extraordinary direct and indirect overhead, multiplicity of Changes, loss of productivity labor or material cost escalations, inefficiency, the "impact" of the Change on the Work, legal expenses, consultant costs, interest, lost profits or revenue, bond or insurance costs, currency fluctuations, changes in taxes or other related claims, costs or damages, and all Compensable Delay costs associated with this change.

Sebastian Felbeck Rashmi Metta

Page 2 of 3 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 7D119C48-BCFC-45FF-8884-643C23F7D735 3/22/2022 3/22/2022
3/22/2022 3/22/2022
3/31/2022

3.A.b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: HDCC Contract and Modifications for Design-Build of City Yard (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.d
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Proposed Relocated Transfer Facility Site Maps (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Order, and SCD

3.A.d
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Proposed Relocated Transfer Facility Site Maps (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Order, and SCD Addendum to the
City of Santa Monica
City Yards Master Plan
Environmental Impact Report
(State Clearinghouse
No. 2017111053)
MAY 2022
Prepared for:

CITY OF SANTA MONICA PUBLIC WORKS
Resource Recovery and Recycling Division
Santa Monica, California
Contact: Chris Celsi, Resource Recovery and Recycling Manager Prepared by:
27372 Calle Arroyo
San Juan Capistrano, California 92675
Contact: Rachel Struglia, PhD, AICP

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Printed on 30% post
-consumer recycled material.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change 13898 i MAY 2022
Table of Contents
SECTION PAGE NO.

Acronyms and Abbreviations............................................................................................................................................ iii 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................1

1.1 Project Background................................................................................................................................1

1.2 Project Overview.....................................................................................................................................2

1.3 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance ................................................................................2

1.4 Format and Content of this Addendum.................................................................................................4

1.5 Preparation and Processing of this Addendum....................................................................................4

1.6 Initial Study Checklist.............................................................................................................................5 2 Project Description...............................................................................................................................................7

2.1 Project Location......................................................................................................................................7

2.2 Environmental Setting............................................................................................................................7

2.3 Proposed Changes to the City Yards Master Plan................................................................................9

2.3.1 Proposed Relocation of the Transfer Facility ..........................................................................9

2.3.2 Proposed Sound Wall ...............................................................................................................9 3 Initial Study Checklist........................................................................................................................................ 11

3.1 Aesthetics/Shadows ........................................................................................................................... 16

3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ................................................................................................... 20

3.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................. 22

3.4 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................................... 34

3.5 Construction Effects............................................................................................................................ 38

3.6 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................. 39

3.7 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................................ 43

3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................................ 48

3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ..................................................................................................... 54

3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality............................................................................................................... 61

3.11 Land Use and Planning ....................................................................................................................... 69

3.12 Mineral Resources .............................................................................................................................. 71

3.13 Neighborhood Effects.......................................................................................................................... 72

3.14 Noise .................................................................................................................................................... 73

3.15 Population and Housing...................................................................................................................... 80

3.16 Public Services .................................................................................................................................... 81

3.17 Recreation............................................................................................................................................ 84

3.18 Transportation and Circulation........................................................................................................... 86

3.19 Tribal Cultural Resources.................................................................................................................... 91

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 ii MAY 2022

3.20 Utilities and Service Systems.............................................................................................................. 94

3.21 Energy .................................................................................................................................................. 99

3.22 Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................................................101 4 Response to Comments .................................................................................................................................105 Comment Letter 1...........................................................................................................................................107 Comment Letter 2...........................................................................................................................................111 Comment Letter 3...........................................................................................................................................117 5 Changes to the Addendum.............................................................................................................................123 6 References ......................................................................................................................................................125 TABLES
1 Construction Scenario Assumptions................................................................................................................ 25 2 Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions ..................................................... 26 3 Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions....................................................... 28 4 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis .............................................................................. 31 5 Operational Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis ................................................................................ 32 6 Estimated Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ..................................................................................... 50 7 Estimated Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions ....................................................................................... 51 8 Construction Noise Model Results Summary.................................................................................................. 75 9 Comments Received on the Addendum ........................................................................................................105

FIGURES
1 Regional Location ...........................................................................................................................................129 2 Local Vicinity Map ...........................................................................................................................................131 3 Existing Conditions..........................................................................................................................................133 4 Proposed Site Plan..........................................................................................................................................135 5 Noise Measurement Locations ......................................................................................................................137

APPENDICES
A Air Quality Modeling Data
B Noise Modeling Data

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change 13898 iii MAY 2022
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
BMP best management practice
CAAP Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CAP Climate Action Plan
CARB California Air Resources Board
CBC California Building Code
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
cfs cubic feet per second
City City of Santa Monica
CO carbon monoxide
CO2 carbon dioxide
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent
EIR Environmental Impact Report
GHG greenhouse gas
I Interstate
LST localized significance threshold
MM Mitigation Measure
MT metric tons
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NO2 nitrogen dioxide
NOx oxides of nitrogen
O3 ozone
PM10 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 10 microns PM2.5 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 2.5 microns PRIMP Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCD Southern California Disposal
SMBC Santa Monica Building Code
SMMC Santa Monica Municipal Code
SOx sulfur oxides
SWPPP stormwater pollution prevention plan
TAC toxic air contaminant
UST underground storage tank
VOC volatile organic compound

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 iv MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change 13898 1 MAY 2022
1 Introduction
This document is an Addendum to the City of Santa Monica City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) [SCH No. 2017111053], which was certified by the City of Santa Monica (City) on January 16, 2019. This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the relevant provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (as amended) and the State CEQA Guidelines as implemented by the City. According to Section 15164(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to a previously certified EIR is the appropriate environmental document in instances when project changes or additions are necessary, but there would be no new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the EIR.

This introduction will discuss (1) the requirements of CEQA, (2) the City Yards Master Plan EIR (SCH No. 2017111053), (3) the format and content of this Addendum, (4) the City’s processing requirements to consider the project for approval, and (5) an explanation of the Environmental Checklist (Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines).

1.1 Project Background
The City owns and operates the approximately 14.7-acre City Yards Site located at 2500 Michigan Avenue. Since the early 1900s, clay-mining operations took place in the central portion of the City and were in some cases used as landfills, including the City Yards Site. After clay quarries were depleted in approximately 1935, the area was used as a municipal incinerator and landfill by the City. A portion of the City Yards Site is located within the former landfill known as the City of Santa Monica Landfill No. 2. The landfill operated as a municipal solid waste and incinerator ash landfill from late 1947 until its closure in December 1970. The site was then developed with its existing industrial uses. Over the years, the settling and shifting of the fill material compromised the structural integrity of some of the buildings on the City Yards Site, including through pavement shift and buckling.

The City took ownership of the City Yards Site in the late 1940s. The City constructed a series of three buildings to house City Yards operations occupying the land between Michigan Avenue and the former Santa Monica rubbish disposal pit. These three buildings were designed to accommodate the needs and program requirements of the City at the time. These buildings included a small garage transfer station and gas station, an auto repair and maintenance shop with two vehicle lifts, and a broom repair and blacksmith’s shop. These same three buildings from the 1940s house the majority of the operations in the City Yards Site today. Facilities shops, crew space, and administrative space were sized to accommodate the staffing levels at the time. This property has been used as the base for the majority of the City’s field maintenance operations, storage facilities, and other industrial uses since then.

As program needs changed through the years, the City Yards Site was adapted as needed for various City functions, resulting in an inefficient use of space. Population growth, updates in technology, and differing service requirements have also resulted in a series of haphazard updates throughout the site. When additional shop, maintenance, or office space was needed, the existing warehouse and open equipment storage bays were converted and reconfigured to accommodate these needs. This reconfiguration of old buildings is the result of a decades-long process of “making do” with a facility that the City outgrew many years prior.

Today, the City Yards operates 7 days a week and currently houses more functions and employees than it was designed to accommodate. Functional needs and space requirements are no longer met by the facilities for any of the operations housed at the City Yards. Deficiencies include a lack of maintenance shop space, inadequate

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 2 MAY 2022
number of vehicle hoists, undersized covered maintenance area for heavy-duty vehicles, a lack of sufficiently sized employee restroom/locker facilities, unsafe and inefficient on-site vehicle circulation, and a lack of sufficient parking for City employees and the public.

The City and the design team worked to build a concept design to reconstruct the City Yards, which is presented in the City Yards Master Plan. The City Yards Master Plan seeks to provide a more efficient flow of operations, improved infrastructure, and sustainable features. Additionally, the City proposes construction of other new facilities, storage canopy-covered surface parking, and a multilevel parking structure with up to five levels. The City Yards Master Plan would also include improved utilities infrastructure, circulation improvements, landscaping, lighting, and sustainability features. Construction activities for the City Yards Master Plan would occur over multiple phases to allow for continued use of the site during reconstruction.

An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the City Yards Master Plan project in accordance with Section 15087 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The City Yards Master Plan was certified on January 16, 2019.

Construction of the City Yards Master Plan Project began in 2020 and is ongoing.

1.2 Project Overview
As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, the City proposed to implement the City Yards Master Plan, which would entail demolition of existing buildings/facilities and reconstruction of the City Yards Site with new buildings/ facilities, infrastructure upgrades, circulation improvements, and sustainable features to address existing deficiencies. The change to be assessed in this Addendum is a change in location of the City’s tip and transfer facility, which would be relocated from its current location at City Yards south of the Fire Department Training area to the Hanson and Southern California Disposal (SCD) lots. This location for the transfer center was not previously assessed in the EIR because it was assumed this location would not move. The relocation is necessary due to the expansion of the Fire Department Training area, although their facilities are not expanding beyond what was assessed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. For the purposes of analysis, the proposed project is defined as the implementation of the City Yards Master Plan with the currently proposed changes as follows:
▪ Proposed relocation of the transfer facility
▪ Proposed sound wall on the Hanson lot to extend from the existing eastern wall along the SCD lot ▪ Relocation of the fire lane that currently bisects the Hanson lot to a location north of the Hanson lot that connects to the fire access gate at the mobile home park

1.3 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance
CEQA, a statewide environmental law described in California Public Resources Code, Sections 21000–21177, applies to most public agency decisions to carry out, authorize, or approve actions that have the potential to adversely affect the environment. The overarching goal of CEQA is to protect the physical environment. To achieve that goal, CEQA requires that public agencies identify the environmental consequences of their discretionary actions and consider alternatives and mitigation measures that could avoid or reduce significant adverse impacts when avoidance or reduction is feasible. It also gives other public agencies and the general public an opportunity to comment on the information. If significant adverse impacts cannot be avoided, reduced, or mitigated to below a level of significance, the public agency is required to prepare an EIR and balance the project’s environmental concerns with other goals and benefits in a statement of overrising considerations.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 3 MAY 2022
The CEQA Guidelines allow for updating and using a previously certified EIR for projects that have changed or are different from the previous project or conditions analyzed in the certified EIR. In cases where changes or additions occur with no new significant environmental impacts, an addendum to a previously certified EIR may be prepared, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164.

Specifically, Section 15164(a) states that:

The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.

Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requires a Subsequent EIR where an EIR has already been prepared under the following circumstances:

Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances in which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration,
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR,
c. Mitigation measures or alternative previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

The purpose of this Addendum is to address whether currently proposed changes to the original City Yards Master Plan could result in any new significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe such that a subsequent EIR would be required (pursuant to 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines). As indicated in the analysis provided herein, the proposed changes would not constitute a substantial change in the City Yards Master Plan Project that will involve “new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.” The environmental impacts associated with the proposed modifications would be within the envelope of impacts analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR and/or do not constitute a new or greater significant impact. On the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, the City has determined that an Addendum is the appropriate form of CEQA documentation to address the proposed transfer facility.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 4 MAY 2022

1.4 Format and Content of this Addendum
The following components comprise this Addendum:
▪ Introduction (Chapter 1) and Project Description (Chapter 2) ▪ The completed Environmental Checklist and its associated analysis (Chapter 3), which conclude that the project would not result in any new significant environmental impacts or substantially increase the severity of environmental impacts beyond the levels disclosed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR ▪ Other documentation that evaluates the project and/or project site, which are appended to this Addendum:
- Appendix A, Air Quality Modeling Data
- Appendix B, Noise Modeling Data
▪ The City Yards Master Plan EIR is incorporated by reference herein, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150, and is available for review online:

Online
City Yards Master Plan EIR
https://www.smgov.net/Departments/PCD/Environmental-Reports/City-Yards-Project-EIR/

1.5 Preparation and Processing of this Addendum
The City directed and supervised the preparation of this Addendum. Although prepared with assistance from the consulting firm Dudek, the content contained in, and conclusions drawn by, this Addendum reflect the sole independent judgment of the City.

This Addendum will be forwarded, along with the previously certified City Yards Master Plan EIR, to the City’s decision-making body for review as part of its deliberations concerning the project. A public hearing will be held on June 14, 2022, to evaluate the project and the adequacy of this Addendum. Public comments will be heard at this hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the decision-making body may provide a decision to approve, approve with modifications, or deny approval of the proposed project. If approved, the decision-making body will adopt findings relative to the project’s environmental impacts.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 5 MAY 2022

1.6 Initial Study Checklist
The City prepared the proposed project’s Environmental Checklist per CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(d)(3) and 15168(c)(4).1 Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines includes a suggested checklist to indicate whether the conditions set forth in Section 15162, which would require a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, are met and whether there would be new significant impacts resulting from the project not examined in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. The checklist can be found in Chapter 3 of this document. Following the checklist, Sections 3.1 through 3.21 include an explanation and discussion of each significance determination made in the checklist.

The following four possible responses to each of the individual environmental issue areas are included in the checklist:

New Significant Impact. This response is used to indicate when the project has changed to such an extent that major revisions of the City Yards Master Plan EIR are required due to the presence of new significant environmental effects.

More Severe Impacts. This response is used to indicate when the circumstances under which the project is undertaken have changed to such an extent that major revisions of the City Yards Master Plan EIR are required because the severity of previously identified significant effects would substantially increase.

New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact. This response is used to show when there is new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the City Yards Master Plan EIR was certified; it indicates that there are new mitigation measures or alternatives available to substantially reduce significant environmental impacts of the project.

No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. This response is used to indicate that the project would not create a new impact or substantially increase the severity of the previously identified environmental impact disclosed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR.

The Environmental Checklist and accompanying explanation of checklist responses provide the information and analysis necessary to assess relative environmental impacts of the project inclusive of the proposed changes in the context of environmental impacts addressed in the previously certified City Yards Master Plan EIR. As indicated in the Checklist, the proposed revisions to the City Yards Master Plan would not result in new or substantially severe significant environmental effects.
1 On December 28, 2018, the Natural Resources Agency adopted the final text for the 2019 CEQA Guidelines Update. Since this Addendum is evaluating whether the proposed project would result in more severe impacts or new significant impacts compared to the City Yards Master Plan EIR, the Appendix G checklist reflects the same checklist found in the Initial Study (Appendix A to the City Yards Master Plan EIR).

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 6 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change 13898 7 MAY 2022
2 Project Description

2.1 Project Location
City Yards Site
The approximately 14.7-acre City Yards Site is located at 2500 Michigan Avenue in the Pico neighborhood area of the City of Santa Monica (Figure 1, Regional Location, and Figure 2, Local Vicinity Map). The City Yards Site is generally located in the eastern portion of the City near the Bergamot Plan area. The City Yards Site is generally bounded by Michigan Avenue and 26th Street Arts Center (previously known as the Bergamot Arts Center) to the north, Stewart Street and Gandara Park (previously known as Stewart Park) to the east, Interstate (I) 10 to the south, a mobile home park to the southeast, and 24th Street to the west.

Proposed Changes
The former Santa Monica Recycling Center, which consisted of a public buy back center and a transfer facility, was located on the southernmost portion of the City Yards Site along Delaware Avenue at 2411 Delaware Avenue. The public buy back center ceased operations in June 2019. The transfer facility ceased operations in September 2021 (shown in red on Figure 3, Existing Conditions). The existing Fire Department Training Facility, located directly to the north on the City Yards Site, is expanding into the area of the transfer center, although no new facilities beyond what was assessed in the City Yards EIR are being added.

The proposed transfer facility would be relocated to the Hanson and SCD lots, which are located just east of Frank Street (shown in green on Figure 4, Proposed Site Plan). This location for the tip, load, and transfer was not included as part of the City Yards Master Plan EIR. Additionally, a sound wall would be constructed along the Hanson Lot to extend from the existing SCD wall.

Trucks would enter the SCD property and tip materials there. Curbside recycled material would be separated out first. Then other materials would be sorted into different bins that would be located on the Hanson lot (e.g., dirt, construction and demolition material, and concrete). Tip and transfer activities would mostly occur on the SCD property, but they may need to occur occasionally on the Hanson lot. Two different locations on the SCD and Hanson lots were modeled for tip and transfer activities from a noise perspective to determine if these activities would exceed the City’s noise ordinance.

2.2 Environmental Setting
Existing Land Uses
Currently, the City Yards operates 7 days a week and is used as the center for the City’s maintenance operations, storage facilities, Fire Department staff training, Water Department, and other industrial uses. These operations and services include the following:
▪ Facilities Maintenance: The Facilities Maintenance Division consists of Custodial Services and Facilities Services and is responsible for the overall building maintenance, repairs, renovations, and custodial services for existing physical assets. The division is composed of electricians, plumbers, heating and ventilation technicians, painters, carpenters, and custodians.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 8 MAY 2022
▪ Street and Fleet Services: The Street and Fleet Services Division consists of Fleet Management, Parking and Meter Repairs, Street Maintenance, and Street Signs and Markings. Fleet Management is responsible for ensuring that City vehicles are available, dependable, cost effective, energy efficient, and safe to operate. The Parking Meter and Repair sector is responsible for installation, maintenance, and repair of parking meters. Street Maintenance is responsible for pavement maintenance for all public rights-of-way, City-owned parking lots, and state highways located within the City. Street Signs and Markings is responsible for the installation, maintenance, and repair of traffic signs, roadway striping, painted curb zones, and crosswalks. Within the City Yards Site, there are vehicle wash bays, a fuel island, covered storage for vehicles, and a storage building.
▪ Traffic Operations: The Traffic Operations Division is responsible for installation, maintenance, and repair of traffic control devices, including traffic signs, roadway striping, painted curb zones, and parking meters.

This division responds to reports regarding traffic signs, malfunction of parking meters, and malfunction of traffic signals. In emergencies, the division provides personnel and materials to assist with traffic control, including road barricades and traffic signs.
▪ Resource Recovery and Recycling: The Resources Recovery and Recycling Division offers collection services to residential and commercial for waste, recyclable materials, and landfill trash. It also performs residential and arterial street sweeping. The SCD Transfer Station is located across Frank Street (1908 Frank Street); here, the public can drop off construction debris, trash, dirt, concrete, and green scraps. The SCD Transfer Station is permitted for 1,056 tons per day.
▪ Water Resources: The Water Resources Division is responsible for providing the community with services related to water supply, production, treatment collection, and wastewater and stormwater collection. This division is responsible for answering questions with regard to water utility services, responding to billing questions related to these services, and implementing activities to manage sanitary sewer collections. ▪ Fire Department: The City Yards is home to the Fire Department Training Facility, including three buildings used for training and one building used as an instructional area. ▪ Other Community Services: The City Yards also hosts the Trades Intern Program, for ages 18 and up, and Rosie’s Girls, for girls in grades 5-8. Community and Cultural Services offers a 3-week intensive summer camp, where girls learn applied skills in carpentry, welding, firefighting, and other trades at Rosie’s Girls.

The Maintenance Management Division operates the Trades Intern Program for local youth, offering onthe-job training in carpentry, plumbing, electrical work, painting, and fleet repair.

Demolition and construction of a number of buildings at the City Yards Site, as approved under the City Yards Master Plan EIR, is currently underway.

Surrounding Land Uses
The City Yards Site is located in the Pico neighborhood area of the City near the Bergamot Plan area. Land uses surrounding the City Yards Site consist of a mix of light industrial, industrial, art studios, creative office, commercial, recreational, and residential uses.
▪ North: Directly across Michigan Avenue to the north of the project site is the 26th Street Art Center (formerly Bergamot Station Arts Center)—a 5-acre complex with a number of art galleries, architects/design firms, creative offices, a small café, and surface parking. Additionally, the 26th Street Bergamot Station for the Expo Light Rail Line is located within a 5-minute walk, to the north along Olympic Boulevard (on the north side of the surface parking for the 26th Street Art Center). Creative office buildings, an auto body shop, and

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 9 MAY 2022
the Ocean Park Community Center Safe Haven shelter are located to the northwest at the western end of Michigan Avenue.

Additionally, Ishihara Park and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Expo Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility are located northeast of the City Yards Site across Stewart Street. Farther north across Olympic Boulevard are the Water Garden Office complex and the Pen Factory building with office/creative office uses.
▪ East: Low-density housing, single-family housing, and parks and open space are located to the east of the City Yards Site. Gandara Park and a mobile home park are immediately east of the project site. Other residential uses, including one- and two-story single-family houses, are located across Stewart Street farther to the east.
▪ South: Immediately south of the project site is the SCD Transfer Station, where the collection, sorting, and transfer of refuse occurs. Additionally, a pest control shop is located to the south. I-10, which runs east– west, is located south of these uses. Beyond I-10 farther to the south are medium-density two- and threestory apartment buildings and Edison Language Academy, in the Pico neighborhood. ▪ West: Directly west of the City Yards Site is a two-story office building and a gas station along 24th Street.

Farther to the west across Cloverfield Boulevard are two gas stations and a building supply company.

Extending west until 17th Street are a variety of uses that include a private school; University of California, Los Angeles, laboratory building (Michigan Operations Center); a food bank; a synagogue; and other nonindustrial uses, amidst the older industrial uses and Southern California Edison electrical substation.

2.3 Proposed Changes to the City Yards Master Plan
For the purposes of analysis, the proposed project is defined as the implementation of the City Yards Master Plan with the proposed changes, which include the relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of the fire access to the mobile home park.

2.3.1 Proposed Relocation of the Transfer Facility
The City’s transfer facility, which was located in the southern portion of the City Yards Site, would be relocated to the Hanson and SCD lots. The Hanson lot is owned by the City and the SCD lot is owned by Southern California Disposal. The two lots would be combined so that the tipping activities would occur primarily on the SCD lot and the sorting and transfer activities would occur on the Hanson lot. The proposed transfer facility would occupy an approximately 40,942-square-foot area.

The SCD lot is currently used by SCD to store equipment used in the transfer station operations. The addition of the Hanson lot would allow enough space to sort the materials into different piles, primarily dirt, concrete, construction and demolition material, large recyclable items such as mattresses and scrap metal as well as store equipment and provide a staging area for trucks that may be waiting for the SCD transfer area to clear of trucks depositing materials.

2.3.2 Proposed Sound Wall
Immediately east of the proposed transfer facility (item 1 on Figure 4), a 12-foot-high acoustical K-Rail barrier mounted sound wall would be constructed to extend from the existing wall on the SCD lot. The sound wall would be approximately 150 to 200 feet long.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 10 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change 13898 11 MAY 2022
3 Initial Study Checklist

1. Project title:

City of Santa Monica City Yards Master Plan EIR Addendum

2. Lead agency name and address:

City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street, Room 212
Santa Monica, California 90407

3. Contact person and phone number:

Chris Celsi
Resource Recovery and Recycling Manager
310.458.8528

4. Project location:

Hanson Lot:

Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 4268016902
Frank Street
Santa Monica, California 90404
SCD Lot:

APNs 4268016004, 4268016007
Frank Street
Santa Monica, California 90404

5. Project sponsor’s name and address:

City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street, Room 212
Santa Monica, California 90407

6. General Plan designation:

Both the Hanson and SCD lots are designed Industrial.

7. Zoning:

Both the Hanson and SCD lots are zoned Industrial Conservation (IC) zone.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 12 MAY 2022

8. Description of project. (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary):

The proposed project is defined as the implementation of the City Yards Master Plan with the relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of the fire access to the mobile home park from Frank Street as described in Chapter 2 of this Addendum.

9. Surrounding land uses and setting (Briefly describe the project’s surroundings):

The City Yards Site lies within the Santa Monica City limits. The City Yards Site is situated between I-10 (the Cloverfield Boulevard exit) and the new Expo Line (26th Street/Bergamot Station). The site is also approximately one block from the Olympic eastbound and 26th far side bus stop.

According to the City’s General Plan Zoning Map, the project is surrounded by Industrial Conservation, Conservation: Art Center, Open Space, Residential Mobile Home Park, and Bergamot Transit Village zoning.

To the east of the project site is Gandara Park, a neighborhood park. Across Stewart Street are residential homes and Ishihara Park. To the south is a mobile home park, part of the Pico neighborhood. To the west, designated industrial zoning extends to Cloverfield Boulevard (City of Santa Monica 2010). To the north, across Michigan Avenue, is Bergamot Station. To the south is SCD and Dewey Pest Control. The Santa Monica Municipal Airport is located approximately 1.5 miles to the south.

10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement):

Contract amendment/new contract with SCD.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 13 MAY 2022
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that would result in a determination of either “More Severe Impact” or “New Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics/Shadows Agriculture and Forestry
Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Construction Effects Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Neighborhood Effects Noise Population/Housing
Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic
Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Service Systems Energy Consumption Mandatory Findings of
Significance

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
Based on the information and analysis in this addendum, pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Santa Monica determines the following.

Modifications to the proposed project as described in this addendum and any altered conditions since adoption of the project's 2019 EIR:
■ would not result in any new significant or potentially significant environmental effects, and ■ would not substantially increase the severity or intensity of previously identified effects.

In addition, no new information of substantial importance has arisen that shows that:
■ the proposed project modifications would have new significant or potentially significant effects, ■ the proposed project modifications would have substantially more severe effects, ■ mitigation measures previously found to be infeasible would in fact be feasible, or ■ mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the 2019 EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant or potentially significant effects on the environment.

Thus, none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for preparation of a subsequent MND have occurred. For this reason, this Addendum to the 2019 EIR is consistent with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and is the appropriate mechanism to address the proposed project modifications.

Signature Date
DUDEK 13898
FEBRUARY 2022 14

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 15 MAY 2022
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Section 15168(c) of the CEQA Guidelines provides that when the lead agency adopts a program EIR, subsequent activities in the program are examined in light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. If the lead agency finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no new effects could occur or mitigation measures would be required, the activity may be approved as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(c)(2)). Pursuant to Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, if the lead agency determines that one or more of the following conditions are met, a subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall be prepared for the project:

1. Substantial project changes are proposed that will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;

2. Substantial changes would occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions to the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or

3. New information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified or the negative declaration was adopted shows any of the following:

A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than identified in the previous EIR; C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or D. Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.

Where none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 are present, the lead agency can choose not to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)), but may prepare a negative declaration, an addendum, or no further CEQA documentation. Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines states that an addendum to an EIR shall be prepared “if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, the City has determined that an Addendum to the City Yards Master Plan EIR is the appropriate environmental document for the project. This Addendum reviews the changes proposed by the project and any pertinent changes to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that have occurred since the City Yards Master Plan EIR was certified. It also reviews any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the City Yards Master Plan EIR was certified. It further examines whether, as a result of any changes or any new information, a subsequent or supplemental EIR may be required. This examination includes an analysis of the provisions of Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and their applicability to the project.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 16 MAY 2022

3.1 Aesthetics/Shadows

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
I. AESTHETICS/SHADOWS – Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited to,
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic
highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of the site
and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light
or glare which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the area?
e) Produce extensive shadows affecting
adjacent uses or property?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and the SCD lot, which is directly adjacent to the City Yards Site.

As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, the City is largely urbanized and features a variety of natural and built visual resources. The urbanized and industrial nature of the City Yards Site and the immediate

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 17 MAY 2022
surrounding area limit opportunities for views to scenic resources. Furthermore, the City Yards Site and surrounding area are not within the viewshed of important visual resources. As such, the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would not have an adverse effect on a scenic vista, as there are no scenic resources, either natural or created, within the viewshed of the City Yards Site.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with scenic vistas would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and the SCD lot, which is directly adjacent to the City Yards Site.

As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, there are no officially designated state or county scenic highway within the City. According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans 2018), the nearest eligible, not designated, state scenic highway is Pacific Coast Highway, located approximately 1.2 miles to the west from the City Yards Site. Since there are no designated scenic highways within the City, the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with scenic highways would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
c) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not construct new buildings from what was analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall. During the various phases of proposed project construction, existing buildings and facilities would be vacated and demolished and new buildings and facilities would be constructed. During each phase, construction activity would be concentrated in a particular area of the City Yards Site to allow for ongoing City operations. Within this construction area, an assortment of construction vehicles and equipment, including graders, rollers, tractors/loaders/backhoes, pavers, and air compressors, may be in operation during working hours and a temporary influx of construction workers would occur. Visual changes to the project site would occur throughout construction as existing structures are removed and the forms of new structures (e.g., new fence) slowly take shape. The staging of construction equipment and vehicles and construction of smaller-scale structures on the site would not be noticeable to off-site viewers in the surrounding area, because construction fencing would be erected pursuant to SMMC requirements. Further, construction activities would occur on an already developed industrial site.

Therefore, no new or more severe short-term construction impacts associated with visual character and quality would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 18 MAY 2022
Long-Term Operational Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As proposed, the City intends to modernize City Yards operations through the construction of new structures similar in scale to existing structures. The transfer facility would be relocated within the City Yards Site and the SCD lot, which are already supporting industrial uses and would not involve the construction of new buildings. Therefore, there would be no change to the previous determination made in the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to new construction and renovation of existing structures.

The proposed relocation of the transfer facility would also require the construction of a 12-foot-high acoustical K-Rail barrier mounted sound wall that would extend from the existing wall on the SCD lot and would be shielded using a landscape buffer; thus, the proposed 12-foot wall would not result in degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. The proposed relocation of the transfer facility would not degrade the existing visual character or quality because this use already occurs within the City Yards Site. Further, under CEQA Section 21099 (as amended by Senate Bill 743), a project’s aesthetic impacts are not considered significant impacts on the environment if the project is a residential, mixed-use residential, or employment center project, or the project is located on an infill site within a transit-priority area.

This provision for aesthetic impacts does not include impacts to historic or cultural resources. The proposed project is an employment center project located on an infill site. The project site is classified as in a transitpriority area due to its proximity to the 26th Street/Bergamot Station for the Expo Line. Therefore, aesthetic impacts would be less than significant.

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term operational impacts associated with visual character and quality would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required. d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As analyzed in the EIR, the City Yards Master Plan would be constructed in phases over an approximately 9-year period. The only new construction associated with the proposed changes would be the sound wall and minor grading and paving for the fire lane, which would be constructed along with the other components of the City Yards Master Plan. Construction activities would typically occur during hours permitted by the SMMC (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and Saturday, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) and would not generally require the use of portable lighting elements to illuminate development areas during evening hours.

Portable lighting would not typically be required during construction of the proposed project. However, if construction crews use lighting during specific months of the year when hours of daylight are reduced, then use of lighting would conform to SMMC requirements regulating lighting. Due to the anticipated limited need for portable lighting during construction activities, the temporary and short-term duration of its use, and the proposed project’s conformance with the SMMC, use of lighting on the project site during construction activities would not adversely affect nighttime views in the area.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 19 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe short-term construction impacts associated with light and glare would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

Long-Term Operational Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As proposed, the City intends to modernize City Yards operations through the construction of new structures that are similar in scale to existing structures. As analyzed in the EIR, new interior and exterior building lighting and lighting on the internal drive aisles would operate in a similar manner as existing lighting on the City Yards Site. The only new construction associated with the proposed changes would be the sound wall, which does not include any new lighting sources. The relocation of the transfer facility near the existing mobile home park may include additional nighttime lighting for security purposes. However, the City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed changes, would comply with SMMC standards regulating shielding, light trespass, and maximum height of light poles. The SMMC requires that all lighting fixtures be shielded “so as not to produce obtrusive glare” onto the public right-of-way or adjacent properties and that light be primarily retained on site (“lighting may not illuminate other properties in excess of a measurement of 0.5 foot candles of light”) (SMMC, Section 9.21.080[C]).

Therefore, adherence to SMMC standards and regulations regarding shielding and light trespass would reduce potentially adverse effects to daytime and nighttime views due to new lighting to a less-thansignificant level.

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term operational impacts associated with light and glare would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
e) Would the project produce extensive shadows affecting adjacent uses or property? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. A change in significance impact would occur if the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would create a shade or shadow that affects shadowsensitive uses such as open space or residential uses. The only new construction associated with the proposed changes would be the sound wall, which would not have the potential to produce new shadows affecting shadow-sensitive uses such as Gandara Park and the mobile home park to the east of the proposed project site. This structure would be a continuation of the fence located on the western boundary of the mobile home park; however, the structure would be shielded using a landscape buffer. Uses associated with the transfer facility would move closer to the mobile home park; however, the majority of activities would occur several feet lower than the proposed 12-foot fence and landscaping, and thus, would not produce extensive shadows affecting the mobile home park.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with extensive shadows would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with aesthetics would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 20 MAY 2022
Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to aesthetics/shadows.

3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources

New Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES – In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown
on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land (as
defined in Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources Code
section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined
by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to nonforest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their
location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 21 MAY 2022
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (No Impact) b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (No Impact) c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? (No Impact) d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? (No Impact) e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? (No Impact) Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? and
b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? and
c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? and
d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? and
e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site. As analyzed in the EIR, the California Department of Conservation designates the City Yards Site as Urban and Built-Up Land (DOC 2016a). The SCD lot is also zoned Urban and Built-Up Land. Therefore, the proposed project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 22 MAY 2022
or Farmland of Statewide Importance (collectively “Important Farmland”) to non-agricultural use. In addition, the Los Angeles County Williamson Act 2015/2016 Map designates the City Yards Site and surrounding land as non-Williamson Act Land (DOC 2016b). In addition, the City Yards Site is zoned Industrial Conservation (IC), and the surrounding land uses consist of a mix of art, residential, creative office, research and development, and industrial uses. Therefore, the proposed project changes, which are on the City Yards Site and the adjacent SCD lot, would not conflict with agriculturally zoned land. The implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would not contribute to the loss or conservation of forest land, and would not result in the conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with agricultural lands, agricultural zoning, Williamson Act contracts, forestland, or timberland would occur; the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with agricultural lands, forestland, or timberland would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to agriculture or forestry resources.

3.3 Air Quality

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
III. AIR QUALITY – Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing
or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 23 MAY 2022

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
d) Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Less-ThanSignificant Impact) b) Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Less-Than-Significant Impact)
c) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) d) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Less-ThanSignificant Impact) e) Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Less-ThanSignificant Impact) PDF-AQ-1 Tier 4 Interim Construction Equipment. Prior to the commencement of any construction activities, the City of Santa Monica (City) or its designee shall provide evidence that for off-road equipment with engines rated at 75 horsepower or greater, no equipment shall be used that is less than CARB-certified Tier 4 Interim engines, except where the City or its designee establishes that Tier 4 Interim equipment is not available. In the case where the City or its designee is unable to secure a piece of equipment that meets the Tier 4 Interim requirement, the City or its designee may upgrade another piece of equipment to compensate (from Tier 4 Interim to Tier 4 Final). Engine Tier requirements in accordance with this measure shall be incorporated on all construction plans.

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that impacts associated with buildout of the City Yards Master Plan would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan and would be less than significant.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 24 MAY 2022
The City Yards Site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, and is within the jurisdictional boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD administers the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SCAB, which is a comprehensive document outlining an air pollution control program for attaining all California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Each AQMP incorporates significant new scientific data, primarily in the form of updated emissions inventories, ambient measurements, new meteorological episodes, and new air quality modeling tools. The most recent AQMP is the 2016 AQMP (SCAQMD 2017), which was adopted by SCAQMD in March 2017. The 2016 AQMP is designed to achieve the applicable NAAQS for ozone (O3) and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 2.5 microns (fine particulate matter; PM2.5) and the CAAQS for O3, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 10 microns (coarse particulate matter; PM10), and PM2.5 through a variety of air quality control measures. The 2016 AQMP also accommodates planned growth in the SCAB. The 2016 AQMP was approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on April 10, 2017. The purpose of a consistency finding is to determine if a project is inconsistent with the assumptions and objectives of the regional air quality plans, and thus if it would interfere with the region’s ability to comply with federal and state air quality standards.

SCAQMD recommends that environmental documents discuss the project’s consistency with the current AQMP (2016 AQMP), including consistency with a local government’s general plan. ▪ Consistency Criterion No. 1: The proposed project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards of the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. ▪ Consistency Criterion No. 2: The proposed project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase.

To address the criterion regarding the proposed changes’ potential to result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of the ambient air quality standards or interim emission reductions in the AQMP, project-generated construction and operational criteria air pollutant emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2020.4.2. Results of this analysis are included in Appendix A. With regard to construction emissions, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would result in construction of a sound wall to extend from the wall along the east side of the SCD lot. Construction activities for the wall (fencing) would be minimal and estimated criteria air pollutant emissions would be below applicable SCAQMD construction thresholds. Operational criteria air pollutant emissions for the proposed changes were added to those estimated in the City Yards Master Plan EIR and estimated combined emissions would not exceed thresholds for criteria air pollutants and precursors for which the region is in nonattainment, as shown in Section 3.3(b). Specifically, operational emissions would not exceed any of the SCAQMD significance thresholds for any criteria air pollutant; thus, resulting in a less-than-significant impact.

The SCAB is a nonattainment area for O3, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), PM10, and PM2.5 under the NAAQS and/or CAAQS (CARB 2020; EPA 2021). As concluded in Section 3.3(b), the proposed project would result in a net increase of emissions and would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not contribute to the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or delay timely attainment of the ambient air quality standards or interim emission reductions in the 2016 AQMP. Thus, the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes is not anticipated to result in more severe impacts related to consistency with the SCAQMD air quality planning efforts than what was assessed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 25 MAY 2022
With regard to Criterion 2, the City Yards Master Plan EIR concluded that buildout of the City Yards Master Plan would result in population growth consistent with the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG’s) overall growth projections. Because the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes does not include uses that would generate or induce population growth in the project area, the proposed project would be considered consistent with the SCAG 2016 Regional Growth Forecast and would not conflict with the 2016 AQMP or exceed the assumptions in the 2016 AQMP. Additionally, the City Yards Site is currently designated as Industrial Conservation, which preserves space for industrial uses that provide a job base, affordable space for small-scale industrial and manufacturing businesses, and a center of economic activity for the City. Accordingly, the proposed project’s changes would be consistent with the zoning and general plan land use designations.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with consistency with the 2016 AQMP would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that impacts associated with air quality standard violations would be less than significant.

Project construction is anticipated to include minor site preparation and grading, sound wall fence construction, asphalt paving, and striping and signage for the pavement. Notably, no new buildings would be constructed for the tip and transfer activities since existing on-site facilities would be utilized. Criteria air pollutant emissions from construction of the proposed changes were estimated using CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0. Construction scenario assumptions, including phasing, equipment mix, and vehicle trips, were based on information provided by the City and CalEEMod default values and are presented in Table 1. For purposes of estimating project emissions, and based on information provided by City, it is assumed that construction of the proposed project changes (site preparation, grading, and sound wall) would occur over 3 months, with construction starting in the beginning of February 2022 and being completed by the end of April 2022. Default values for horsepower and load factor as provided in CalEEMod were used for all construction equipment listed in Table 1. It was conservatively assumed that all equipment used during each construction subphase would operate 5 days per week. Of note, implementation of PDF-AQ-1, which requires that equipment over 75 horsepower meet Tier 4 Interim requirements, was assumed. Complete detailed construction assumptions are included in Appendix A.

Table 1. Construction Scenario Assumptions
Construction
Phase Start Date Finish Date
One-Way Vehicle Trips Equipment
Average
Daily
Workers
Average
Daily
Vendor
Trucks
Total
Haul
Trucks Type Quantity
Usage
Hours
2/1/2022 3/31/2022 8 4 168 Graders 1 8
Rollers 1 8

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 26 MAY 2022
Table 1. Construction Scenario Assumptions
Construction
Phase Start Date Finish Date
One-Way Vehicle Trips Equipment
Average
Daily
Workers
Average
Daily
Vendor
Trucks
Total
Haul
Trucks Type Quantity
Usage
Hours
Site
Preparation
and Grading
Tractors/
Loaders/
Backhoes
1 8
Building
Construction
(Fencing)
4/1/2022 4/30/2022 10 4 0 Tractors/
Loaders/
Backhoes
1 8
Paving 4/1/2022 4/15/2022 18 2 0 Cement and
Mortar Mixers
4 6
Pavers 1 7
Rollers 1 7
Tractors/
Loaders/
Backhoes
1 7
Pavement
Striping
(Architectural
Coating)
4/16/2022 4/22/2022 2 2 0 Air
Compressors
1 6
Notes: See Appendix A for details.

Table 2 presents the estimated maximum daily construction emissions generated during construction of the proposed project changes, as well as the estimated maximum daily construction emissions from the EIR, conservatively assuming the maximum daily emissions would occur on the same day. The values shown are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions results from CalEEMod. Details of the emission calculations are provided in Appendix A.

Table 2. Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Year
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Pounds per Day
City Yards Master Plan EIR
2022 7.28 17.47 21.94 0.05 1.64 0.48
Transfer Facility Addendum
2022 1.39 6.84 11.37 0.02 0.42 0.16
Maximum Daily
Emissions

8.67 24.31 33.31 0.07 2.06 0.64
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold
Exceeded?
No No No No No No
Notes: VOC = volatile organic compound; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; EIR = Environmental Impact Report; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 27 MAY 2022
See Appendix A for complete results.

The values shown are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions results from CalEEMod.

These emissions reflect CalEEMod “mitigated” output, which accounts for compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) (watering two times daily) and implementation of PDF-AQ-1, which requires that all construction equipment with a horsepower greater than 75 would have certified Tier 4 interim engines.

As shown in Table 1, maximum daily construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (SOx), PM10, or PM2.5 during construction in 2022. Construction-generated emissions would be temporary and would not represent a long-term source of criteria air pollutant emissions. As such, impacts would be less than significant.

Operation of the City Yards Master Plan would generate VOCs, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions from area sources, including the use of consumer products, architectural coatings for repainting, landscape maintenance equipment, energy sources, stationary sources (emergency generators), off-road equipment (forklifts and welders), and fire department training. No increase in mobile source (vehicles) emissions was anticipated. Notably, it was assumed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR that motor vehicle trips would be reduced due to the removal of the Santa Monica Recycling Center/buy-back center.

Operation of the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes is anticipated to generate minimal criteria air pollutant emissions from area sources (use of consumer products for asphalt degreasing) and off-road equipment; no energy sources (natural gas) or mobile source emissions are anticipated. CalEEMod 2020.4.0 was used to estimate area source emissions from the project and a spreadsheet model was used to estimate emissions from off-road equipment. Off-road equipment is anticipated to include one 2019 LH 22 Material Handler (172 horsepower) and three 2021 Liebherr Wheel Loaders L546 (188 horsepower), which would all meet Tier 4 Final requirements. It was assumed that each piece of off-road equipment would operate for 8 hours per day, 260 days per year.

Regarding mobile sources (on-road vehicles), the project assessed in this addendum is not anticipated generate a net increase in employee vehicle or truck trips compared to existing and historical conditions as explained below. Regarding employees, the project would be served by existing employees of the City’s Resource, Recovery, and Recycling Division and no increase in employment is anticipated to be required.

Regarding trucks, currently, inbound trips occur to the SCD site that typically consist of dump trucks of various sizes hauling construction debris and aggregate as operated by the Santa Monica Streets Department, as well as self-haul trips usually in pickup trucks. Regarding outbound trips, currently SCD transfer trucks haul construction debris and aggregate to Downtown Diversion (downtown Los Angeles).

Regarding curbside material trucks, historically (ending in summer 2020), the City’s recycling route drivers delivered their recycling loads to Allan Company, which was located less than 200 feet north of the proposed tip and transfer area. After Allan Company closed their site, the City’s route drivers delivered their recycling loads to an area about 500 to 600 feet northwest of the proposed tip and transfer site to an area directly south of the Fire Department’s training center in the City Yards Site, located on Delaware Avenue.

For an interim period (October 2021–summer 2022) and reflecting current conditions, curbside material is transported in City trucks to Culver City. Under both historical conditions (curbside material collected within the City is delivered to a tip and transfer station within City limits) and current conditions (curbside material collected within the City is delivered to a tip and transfer station in Culver City), following the tip and transfer sorting, the material would be transported to a materials recovery facility, such as facilities in the City of Wilmington and Puente Hills Recovery Station in the City of Whittier.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 28 MAY 2022
The project would eliminate the need to transfer curbside material to Culver City and instead would be collected at the City Yards Site; however, curbside material would continue to be exported by City trucks to a materials recovery facility. Accordingly, curbside material would continue to generate trips as under current and historical conditions and would result in a nominal changes to total vehicle miles traveled compared to current and historical conditions.

As stated above, all other inbound and outbound trips (e.g., construction debris and aggregate and selfhaul) are currently occurring at the SCD site; therefore, collection and export of material at the project site would result in no net increase in trips and a negligible change in vehicle miles traveled given the nominal distance between the SCD site and the project site. As such, no mobile source emissions are anticipated to be generated by the proposed changes, so no quantification of such potential emissions is provided.

Table 3 presents the estimated operational criteria air pollutant emissions associated with the operation of the proposed project (transfer facility relocation, year 2022) plus operation of the City Yards Master Plan Project as evaluated in the City Yards Master Plan EIR (year 2028) and estimated existing emissions in 2019 as evaluated in the City Yards Master Plan EIR to estimate the net change in criteria air pollutant emissions. Details of the emission calculations are provided in Appendix A.

Table 3. Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Emission Source
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Pounds per Day
Existing City Yards Facilities
Area 1.88 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy 0.03 0.28 0.23 0.00 0.02 0.02
Mobile — — — — — —
Existing Total 1.91 0.28 0.24 0.00 0.02 0.02
Proposed Project
City Yards Master Plan EIR
Area 3.24 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy 0.05 0.44 0.37 0.00 0.03 0.03
Mobile — — — — — —
Emergency
Generators

0.01 0.05 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00
Forklifts 0.09 0.41 5.81 0.01 0.01 0.01
Welders — — — — 0.01 0.01
Fire Department
Training

0.04 1.18 1.44 0.06 0.86 0.74
City Yards Master
Plan EIR Subtotal

3.43 2.08 8.12 0.07 0.91 0.79
Transfer Facility Addendum
Area 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy — — — — — —
Mobile — — — — — —
Off-road Equipment 0.29 1.25 10.56 0.02 0.04 0.04

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 29 MAY 2022
Table 3. Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Emission Source
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Pounds per Day
Transfer Facility
Addendum Subtotal

0.30 1.25 10.56 0.02 0.04 0.04
Project Total 3.73 3.33 18.68 0.09 0.95 0.83
Net Project Emissions
Net Project
Emissions

1.82 3.05 18.44 0.09 0.93 0.81
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold
Exceeded?
No No No No No No
Notes: VOC = volatile organic compound; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; EIR = Environmental Impact Report; MD = South Coast Air Quality Management District.

See Appendix A for complete results.

The values shown are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions results from CalEEMod.

As shown in Table 3, operational emissions are not anticipated to exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5. Therefore, impacts associated with project-generated operational criteria air pollutant emissions would be less than significant.

Therefore, with implementation of PDF-AQ-1 during construction, no new or more severe impacts associated with violating regional air quality standards or contributing substantially to existing/projected violations would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. c) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that the City Yards Master Plan’s impacts associated with a cumulatively considerable net increase of a non-attainment criteria pollutant would be less than significant.

In analyzing cumulative impacts from the proposed project, the assessment must specifically evaluate a project’s contribution to the cumulative increase in pollutants for which the SCAB is designated as nonattainment for the federal or state standards. Implementation of the proposed project would generate long-term operational emissions associated with vehicle traffic to and from the City Yards Site, as well as energy use of buildings and facilities.

Air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. The nonattainment status of regional pollutants is a result of past and present air emission sources. Pursuant to the federal and California Clean Air Acts, the SCAQMD develops and implements plans for future attainment of ambient air quality standards. Based on these considerations, project-level thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants are used to help determine whether a project’s individual emissions would have a cumulatively considerable contribution on air quality.

A project would be considered to have a significant cumulative impact if the project’s contribution accounts for a significant proportion of the cumulative total emissions (i.e., it represents a “cumulatively considerable

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 30 MAY 2022
contribution” to the cumulative air quality impact) for pollutants for which the SCAB is designated as nonattainment for the NAAQS or CAAQS (i.e., O3, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5). If a project’s emissions would exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds, it would be considered to have a cumulatively considerable contribution to nonattainment status in the SCAB (SCAQMD 2003). If a project does not exceed thresholds and is determined to have less-than-significant project-specific impacts, it may still contribute to a cumulative impact on air quality; however, the basis for analyzing the propose project’s cumulative considerable contribution under CEQA is the proposed project’s potential to exceed SCAQMD thresholds and its consistency with the most recent AQMP.

The SCAB is a nonattainment area for O3, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 under the NAAQS and/or CAAQS (CARB 2020; EPA 2021). The nonattainment status in the SCAB is the result of cumulative emissions from motor vehicles, off-road equipment, commercial and industrial facilities, and other emission sources. Projects that emit these pollutants or their precursors (e.g., VOC and NOx for O3,) potentially contribute to poor air quality.

The nonattainment status is the result of cumulative emissions from various sources of air pollutants and their precursors within SCAB, including motor vehicles, off-road equipment, and commercial and industrial facilities. Construction and operation of the proposed project would generate VOC and NOx emissions (which are precursors to O3) and emissions of PM10 and PM2.5. However, as indicated in Section 3.3(b), project-generated operational emissions, would not exceed the SCAQMD emission-based significance thresholds for VOCs, NOx, PM10, or PM2.5. Accordingly, the proposed project would result in a less-thansignificant impact regarding contribution to cumulative air quality impacts. In addition, as discussed in Section 3.3(a), the proposed project would not exceed growth projections anticipated in the SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP. Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the nonattainment pollutants in the SCAB, and this impact would be less than significant.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with contributing to a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. d) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that impacts associated with exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations would be less than significant.

Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis
The City Yards Master Plan EIR included a localized significance threshold (LST) to determine potential impacts to nearby sensitive receptors during construction and operation of the City Yards Master Plan, which was found to result in less-than-significant impacts.

The SCAQMD recommends a localized LST analysis to evaluate localized air quality impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the project as a result of proposed project activities. The impacts were analyzed using methods consistent with those in the SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (SCAQMD 2008a). The project is located within Source-Receptor Area 2 (Northwest Coastal Los Angeles County). The nearest off-site sensitive receptor to the City Yards is a mobile home park, which is located adjacent to the east of the proposed transfer facility relocation site. As such, the LST receptor distance was assumed to be 25 meters (82 feet), which is the shortest distance provided by the SCAQMD lookup tables, and a 1-acre construction site was assumed, which is the smallest construction area provided by the SCAQMD lookup tables.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 31 MAY 2022
Project construction activities would result in temporary sources of on-site criteria air pollutant emissions associated with off-road equipment exhaust and fugitive dust generation. According to the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, “off-site mobile emissions from the project should not be included in the emissions compared to the LSTs” (SCAQMD 2008a). Trucks and worker trips associated with the proposed project are not expected to cause substantial air quality impacts to sensitive receptors along offsite roadways since emissions would be relatively brief in nature and would cease once the vehicles pass through the main streets. Therefore, off-site emissions from trucks and worker vehicle trips are not included in the LST analysis. The maximum daily on-site emissions generated during construction of the proposed project in 2022 are presented in Table 4 and are compared to the SCAQMD localized significance criteria for Source-Receptor Area 2 to determine whether project-generated on-site emissions would result in potential LST impacts.

Because LST analyses are localized in nature, project-generated activities and associated emissions at different parts of the site would likely affect different off-site receptors. However, to provide a conservative analysis, estimated on-site emissions from the proposed project changes are added to the on-site emissions estimated in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Construction Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis Year
NO2 CO PM10 PM2.5
Pounds per Day (On-Site)
City Yards Master Plan EIR
Maximum Daily over Construction 13.34 23.51 0.06 0.03
Transfer Facility Addendum
2022 7.76 7.83 0.57 0.21
Maximum Daily Emissions
(Overlap)

21.10 31.34 0.63 0.24
SCAQMD LST Criteria 103 562 4 3
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Source: SCAQMD 2008a.

Notes: NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = particulate matter with a diameter less than or equal to 10 microns (coarse particulate matter); PM2.5 = particulate matter with a diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microns (fine particulate matter); EIR = Environmental Impact Report; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District; LST = localized significance threshold.

See Appendix A for detailed results.

Localized significance thresholds are shown for a 1-acre disturbed area corresponding to a distance to a sensitive receptor of 25 meters in Source-Receptor Area 2 (Northwest Coastal Los Angeles County).

As shown in Table 4, proposed construction activities would not generate emissions in excess of site-specific LSTs; therefore, localized construction impacts of the proposed project would be less than significant.

Regarding operational emissions, the proposed tip and transfer activities would include minor on-site sources of emissions from the operation of off-road equipment. There would be no operational emissions generated by the sound wall or relocated fire lane. As with the construction LST analysis, estimated on-site emissions from the proposed project were conservatively added to estimated on-site emissions from the City Yards Master Plan EIR; the results are shown in Table 5.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 32 MAY 2022
Table 5. Operational Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis Year
NO2 CO PM10 PM2.5
Pounds per Day (On-Site)
City Yards Master Plan EIR
Emergency Generators 0.05 0.46 0.00 0.00
Off-Road Equipment 0.41 5.81 0.01 0.01
Welders — — 0.01 0.01
Fire Department Training 1.18 1.44 0.86 0.74
Transfer Facility Addendum
Off-Road Equipment 1.25 10.56 0.04 0.04
Maximum Daily Emissions
(Overlap)

2.89 18.27 0.92 0.80
SCAQMD LST Criteria 103 562 1 1
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Source: SCAQMD 2008a.

Notes: NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = particulate matter with a diameter less than or equal to 10 microns (coarse particulate matter); PM2.5 = particulate matter with a diameter less than or equal to 2.5 microns (fine particulate matter); SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District; LST = localized significance threshold.

See Appendix A for detailed results.

As shown in Table 5, proposed operational activities would not generate emissions in excess of site-specific LSTs; therefore, localized operational impacts of the proposed project would be less than significant.

As such, the proposed project’s construction and operational activity in relation to the SCAQMD LST thresholds would not result in more severe impacts that what was assessed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR.

Toxic Air Contaminants
Toxic air contaminants (TACs) are defined as substances that may cause or contribute to an increase in deaths or in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. The nearest sensitive receptor to the project area is the mobile home park located approximately 35 feet from the proposed construction boundary. Health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of cancer risk. The SCAQMD recommends an incremental cancer risk threshold of 10 in 1 million.

Incremental cancer risk is the net increased likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of TACs resulting from a project over a 30-year exposure for individual receptors will contract cancer based on the use of standard Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment risk-assessment methodology. In addition, some TACs have non-carcinogenic effects. The SCAQMD recommends a Hazard Index of 1 or more for acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) effects.2 TACs that would be potentially emitted during demolition and construction activities associated with project development would be asbestos and diesel particulate matter.
2 Non-cancer adverse health risks are measured against a hazard index, which is defined as the ratio of the predicted incremental exposure concentrations of the various non-carcinogens from the project to published reference exposure levels that can cause adverse health effects.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 33 MAY 2022
The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would result in minimal construction activity associated with construction of the sound wall and would not require the extensive use of heavy-duty construction equipment; thus, the proposed project would result in minimal TACs during construction compared with what was previously analyzed within the City Yards Master Plan EIR. With regard to operations, the proposed project would not introduce any new long-term sources of TACs. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in substantially more severe impacts on sensitive receptors (health risk) than what was assessed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR.

Health Impacts of Carbon Monoxide
Traffic-congested roadways and intersections have the potential to generate localized high levels of CO.

Localized areas where ambient concentrations exceed federal and/or state standards for CO are termed CO “hotspots.” CO transport is extremely limited and disperses rapidly with distance from the source. Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, however, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthy levels, affecting sensitive receptors such as residents, schoolchildren, hospital patients, and the elderly. Typically, high CO concentrations are associated with severely congested intersections operating at an unacceptable level of service (level of service E or worse). Projects contributing to adverse traffic impacts may result in the formation of a CO hotspot. However, because of continued improvement in mobile emissions at a rate faster than the rate of vehicle growth and/or congestion, the potential for CO hotspots in the basin is steadily decreasing (CARB 2005). The project is not anticipated to generate a net increase in vehicle trips compared to current or historical conditions, as explained in Section 3.3(b). Therefore, the project would not contribute to potential adverse traffic impacts that may result in the formation of CO hotspots.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required. e) Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that the City Yards Master Plan’s impacts associated with creating objectionable odors would be less than significant.

Land uses and industrial operations associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food-processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding (SCAQMD 1993). The proposed project entails the continued operation of the City Yards Site and includes various industrial uses, including relocation of the transfer facility. The transfer facility would only accept dry material including cardboard, papers, bottles, and construction debris and in general, the materials would not sit for longer than 24 hours before being taken offsite. Although the tip and transfer activities would be closer to the mobile home park, the odors generated by the tip and transfer activities exist under historical conditions at the SCD lot.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with objectionable odors would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 34 MAY 2022
Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with air quality would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to air quality.

3.4 Biological Resources
New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations, or
by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede
the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 35 MAY 2022
New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or
state habitat conservation plan?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and the adjacent SCD lot. As analyzed in the EIR, the City is largely urbanized and does not contain suitable habitat for sensitive species or special-status species. The principal vegetation within the City consists of landscaping and cultivated species (ornamentals) with some invasive, weedy, non-native species.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 36 MAY 2022
The City Yards Site has been fully developed for more than 50 years and does not have suitable habitat for native vegetation and sensitive wildlife species. Additionally, the City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot are currently developed with buildings, surface parking areas, and very limited landscaping. As a result, no suitable habitat for sensitive species exists on the site, and there would be no impact to sensitive wildlife.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with candidate, sensitive, or special-status species would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Site EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and the adjacent SCD lot. The City Yards Site and SCD lot are located entirely on disturbed and developed land and have been developed for more than 50 years. No riparian habitat or a sensitive natural community are present within the City Yards Site, and as such, no impacts to riparian or sensitive vegetation communities would occur.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with riparian or sensitive vegetation communities would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. The City Yards Site and SCD lot do not support any aquatic resources regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or California Department of Fish and Wildlife as jurisdictional wetlands, waters of the United States, or waters of the state. Based on review of the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute series Beverly Hills Quadrangle Topographic Map, the City does not contain any blue-line streams or wetland habitats (USGS 2015).

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with federally protected wetlands would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed changes, occurs entirely within the City. Although some local movement of wildlife is expected to occur within the City, the City is not recognized as an existing or proposed Significant Ecological Area that links migratory populations, as designated by Los Angeles County (Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning 2015). The City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot are located within a highly urbanized area and would not

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 37 MAY 2022
interfere with the movement of any native residents, migratory fish, or wildlife species. As such, development of the proposed project would have no impact on the migratory movement of any wildlife species.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with migratory fish or wildlife species would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. Implementation of the City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed changes, would be subject to all applicable federal, state, regional, and local policies and regulations related to the protection of biological resources. Specifically, the proposed project would be required to comply with the federal Endangered Species Act, federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, California Endangered Species Act, California Fish and Game Code, and the SMMC, Chapter 7.40 Tree Code. However, the existing site is developed with industrial uses and would not support nesting species. With compliance with federal, state, and local policies or regulations, no impacts would occur.

Therefore, following compliance with the federal Endangered Species Act, federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, California Endangered Species Act, California Fish and Game Code, and the SMMC, no new or more severe impacts associated with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As analyzed in the EIR, there are no habitat conservation plans, natural community conservation plans, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans that apply to the City. Consequently, the proposed project, inclusive of the changes, would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with biological resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to biological resources.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 38 MAY 2022

3.5 Construction Effects
New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
V. CONSTRUCTION EFFECTS – Would the project:
a) Have considerable construction-period
impacts due to the scope, or location
or construction activities?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Would the project have considerable construction-period impacts due to the scope, or location of construction activities? (Less-Than-Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project have considerable construction-period impacts due to the scope, or location of construction activities?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed changes, would be constructed in phases over an approximately 9-year period. The duration of the majority of construction phases would be greater than 1 year, and activities during phases would generally be concentrated in a specific area of the City Yards Site. Throughout the various phases, construction activities would typically occur during hours permitted by the City’s Noise Ordinance (Chapter 4.12 of the SMMC). It is anticipated that construction activities would occur up to 8 hours per day, 5 days per week.

The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would result in minimal construction activities since existing facilities would be utilized for the transfer and processing facility. Construction activities would be limited to the sound wall and minor grading, paving, and striping for the fire lane.

The City Yards Master Plan EIR concluded that construction effects of the City Yards Master Plan would not result in significant impacts after mitigation. The major impacts associated with construction analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan include aesthetics, air quality, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and transportation and circulation. As such, the potential for the proposed changes to result in new or more significant impacts is further discussed in Sections 3.1, Aesthetics/Shadows; 3.3, Air Quality; 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials; 3.14, Noise; and 3.18, Transportation and Circulation. As discussed herein, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would not result in new or more severe impacts related to aesthetics, air quality, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and transportation and circulation. For further details, refer to each individual resource section.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 39 MAY 2022
Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM) HAZ-1 through MM-HAZ-4, MM-NOI-1, no new or more severe impacts associated with construction effects would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with construction effects would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR required the following applicable mitigation measures related to construction effects, which remain applicable:

MM-HAZ-1 (See Section 3.9)
MM-HAZ-2 (See Section 3.9)
MM-HAZ-3 (See Section 3.9)
MM-HAZ-4 (See Section 3.9)
MM-NOI-1 (See Section 3.14)

3.6 Cultural Resources
New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource
as defined in Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to Section
15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 40 MAY 2022
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (specifically, the relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not result in the additional demolition of existing structures, other than the demolition already assessed within the City Yards Master Plan EIR. The City Yards, the adjacent property, and all associated buildings and structures were found not eligible under all National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, and City designation criteria.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with historical resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and the adjacent SCD lot. Furthermore, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not construct new buildings and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall.

As analyzed in the EIR, no archaeological resources were identified within or adjacent to the City Yards Site as a result of the California Historical Resources Information System records search, Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File search, or the Native American coordination efforts conducted for the City Yards Master Plan EIR. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts to archaeological resources would occur and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 41 MAY 2022
c) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not construct new buildings and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall.

As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, paleontological records search performed by the Los Angeles County History Museum and desktop geographical review did not identify any known fossil localities on the City Yards Site or on the SCD lot. The City Yards Site is located within an area that has been previously developed and is underlain by fill materials, at least in part due to the former landfill. As such, the City Yards Site is unlikely to be underlain by unique geological features. Although the project area has been heavily disturbed by urban development over the years, intact paleontological resources may be present below the original layer of fill material. Given the proximity of the site to past fossil discoveries and due to their relatively shallow depths, the City Yards Site is moderately to highly sensitive for supporting paleontological resources. Because ground-disturbing activities associated with construction of the proposed project have the potential to destroy a unique paleontological resource or site, implementation of MM-CUL-1 would be required to reduce impacts.

Therefore, with incorporation of MM-CUL-1, no new or more severe impacts to paleontological resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
d) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not involve the construction of new buildings and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall. As analyzed in the EIR, the site is already developed; no human remains or cemeteries are anticipated to be disturbed during earthmoving activities. However, existing regulations through California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 et seq. state that if human remains are discovered during project construction, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98(b), remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition of the remains has been made. If the County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within a reasonable time.

Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the most likely descendant. The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98. Given the very low potential for human remains on the project site and required compliance with existing regulations pertaining to the discovery of human remains, the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would result in less than-significant-impacts to human remains.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 42 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with disturbance of human remains would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with cultural resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR required the following mitigation measure related to cultural resources, which remain applicable:

MM-CUL-1 Prior to commencement of any grading activity on site, the City shall retain a qualified paleontologist. The qualified paleontologist shall attend the preconstruction meeting and be on site during all rough grading and other significant ground-disturbing activities in previously undisturbed older Quaternary alluvial deposits, if encountered. These deposits may be encountered at depths as shallow as 5 feet below ground surface. In the event that paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are unearthed during grading, the paleontology monitor will temporarily halt and/or divert grading activity to allow recovery of paleontological resources. According to the 2010 Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines, a qualified paleontology monitor is defined as having (equivalent experience acceptable as appropriate):

A BS or BA degree in geology or paleontology and one year experience monitoring in the state or geologic province of the specific project. An associate degree and/or demonstrated experience showing ability to recognize fossils in a biostratigraphic context and recover vertebrate fossils in the field may be substituted for a degree.

An undergraduate degree in geology or paleontology is preferable, but is less important than documented experience performing paleontological monitoring.

The area of discovery will be roped off with a 25-foot-radius buffer. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find. Finally, the paleontologist shall prepare a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the proposed project. The PRIMP shall be consistent with the 2010 guidelines of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 43 MAY 2022

3.7 Geology and Soils

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating
substantial direct or indirect risks to life
or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste
water?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 44 MAY 2022
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (Less-Than-Significant Impact) ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Less-Than-Significant-Impact) iv. Landslides? (No Impact)
b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (Less-Than-Significant Impact)
d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (No Impact) Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. Thus, the seismic characteristics of the City Yards Site would remain unchanged as that discussed in the EIR, and the design, construction, or operation of the proposed changes would not affect the seismic risks of the site such as fault rupture.

As analyzed in the EIR, the City Yards Site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone (CGS 2018). The nearest such zone, located approximately 3,000 feet north of the project site, is associated with the Santa Monica Fault. The risk of fault rupture in the immediate vicinity of the project site is low. The proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would not directly or indirectly cause or exacerbate existing fault rupture risks. There are no faults known to cross underneath the City Yards Site or adjacent SCD lot.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 45 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with fault rupture would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. The seismic characteristics of the City Yards Site would remain unchanged from those discussed in the EIR. Furthermore, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not include the construction of new buildings for occupancy and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall. Therefore, the design, construction, or operation of the proposed changes would not affect the seismic risks of the site, such as ground shaking.

As analyzed in the EIR, the City is located in a seismically active area. Movement along major faults in proximity to the City, as well as along buried blind thrust faults, can occur across the greater Los Angeles area. These faults, as well as numerous other regional faults (e.g., San Andreas, San Fernando, and Whittier), are capable of producing moderate to large earthquakes that could affect the City, including the project site. However, the proposed project would be constructed in accordance with state and City building standards. As with all development within the City, the proposed project is required to comply with the California Building Code (CBC) and Santa Monica Building Code (SMBC). Proper engineering and compliance with Title 24 of the CBC and the SMBC would ensure the maximum feasible protection of the buildings and occupants. The SMBC includes requirements to ensure that new development does not cause or exacerbate geological and soil hazards, including seismic ground shaking. Measures to minimize the risk of loss, injury, and death from the construction of new buildings are included in the SMBC, with specific provisions for seismic design.

Additionally, the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would be required to meet seismic safety and construction design criteria based on the site-specific recommendations of final geotechnical reports that would be prepared for the construction of project buildings.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with strong seismic ground shaking would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. Thus, the seismic characteristics of the City Yards Site would remain unchanged as that discussed in the EIR. Furthermore, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not include the construction of new buildings for occupancy and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall. Therefore, the design, construction, or operation of the proposed changes would not affect the seismic risks, including liquefaction, of the site.

As part of the City Yards Master Plan EIR, a site-specific liquefaction analysis was performed, using a mean earthquake magnitude of 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.78 g (percent of gravity), using the U.S.

Seismic Hazard Design Maps Tool. Based on the historical highest groundwater level of approximately

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 46 MAY 2022
40 feet below ground surface, the underlying soils would not be prone to liquefaction and associated lateral spreading during the ground motion expected during a major seismic event. Furthermore, as with all development within the City, the proposed project is required to comply with the CBC and SMBC. The SMBC includes requirements to ensure that new development does not cause or exacerbate geological and soil hazards, including seismic ground shaking and seismically related ground failure. Measures to minimize the risk of loss, injury, and death from the construction of new buildings are included in the SMBC, with specific provisions for seismic design. Additionally, the proposed project would be required to meet the most recent seismic safety building criteria and construction design recommendations of the site-specific final geotechnical reports that would be prepared for the construction of project buildings. The proposed project, inclusive of the proposed changes, would not directly or indirectly cause or exacerbate adverse effects involving seismic-related ground failure.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with seismic-related ground failure would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
iv) Landslides?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. Thus, the geologic characteristics of the City Yards Site would remain unchanged from those discussed in the EIR. Furthermore, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not include the construction of additional new buildings for occupancy and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall. Therefore, the design, construction, or operation of the proposed changes would not affect the geologic risks of the site.

As analyzed in the EIR, the likelihood of a landslide is low due to the relatively flat topography at the City Yards Site. Additionally, there are no significant hillsides or unstable slopes within the vicinity of the City Yards Site. According to the Seismic Hazards Zone Map for the Beverly Hills Quadrangle, the City Yards Site is not identified as susceptible to landslides (CGS 2015). Similarly, the City Yards Site and the SCD lot are not located within a City-designated High Landslide Potential Area (City of Santa Monica 1995). Due to these site conditions, the proposed project, inclusive of the proposed changes, would not expose people or structures to adverse risks associated with landslides.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with landslides would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Site and the SCD lot are developed with existing structures and paved areas. As analyzed in the EIR, implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would not result in exposed areas of soil/land that could be subject to erosion. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would not result in significant new erosion impacts as construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall. Temporary erosion could occur during grading and excavation activities. However, since implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would disturb greater than 1 acre of land, the construction contractor is required to prepare and comply with a stormwater

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 47 MAY 2022
pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), which would provide erosion-control measures. Additionally, Section 7010.060 of the SMMC requires construction-phase erosion-control measures to reduce erosionrelated impacts (City of Santa Monica 2021).

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with soil erosion or the loss of topsoil would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. The geologic characteristics of the City Yards Site would remain unchanged from those discussed in the EIR. Furthermore, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not involve the construction of new buildings and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall. Therefore, the design, construction, or operation of the proposed changes would not increase the geologic risks of the site.

The feasibility-level geotechnical report for the City Yards Site (Geotechnologies Inc. 2016) states that the primary geotechnical concern for the development of the site is settlement of refuse landfill, but that construction of the proposed structures is considered feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint.

Compliance with the design measures in the site-specific final geotechnical reports (which are required as part of the plan check process) would ensure that the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would be designed and constructed to mitigate risks associated with highly compressible/unstable soils.

As such, impacts would be less than significant.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with unstable geologic units/soils would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. Thus, the geologic characteristics of the City Yards Site would remain unchanged from those discussed in the EIR. Furthermore, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not involve the construction of new buildings for occupancy and construction activities would be limited to those required for the sound wall. Therefore, the design, construction, or operation of the proposed changes would not increase the expansive soil risks of the site.

Based on site-specific geotechnical investigations, on-site geologic materials are in the very low to moderate expansion range. The ability of moderately expansive clays to change volume could result in uplift or cracking of concrete foundations, sidewalks, or other hardscapes, in the absence of proper geotechnical engineering. In addition, as with all development in the City, the proposed project is required to comply with

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 48 MAY 2022
the SMBC. Measures to minimize the risk of expansive soils on building foundations are included in the CBC. Although the City Yards Site overlies moderately expansive soils, compliance with the design measures in the site-specific final geotechnical reports (which are required as part of the plan check process) will ensure that project design and construction would not pose risks to life or property due to potentially expansive soils. As such, impacts would be less than significant.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with expansive soils would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. New buildings to be constructed under the City Yards Master Plan would connect directly to the municipal sanitary sewer system, nor would they require septic tanks or any other alternative wastewater disposal system. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not involve the construction of new buildings that would require additional wastewater disposal.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with the adequacy of soils and septic systems would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with geology and soils would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to geology and soils.

3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,
either directly or indirectly, that may
have a significant impact on the
environment?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 49 MAY 2022

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy
or regulation adopted for the purpose
of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Less-Than-Significant Impact)
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (Less-Than-Significant Impact)
Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that impacts associated with generation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions would be less than significant.

GHGs are gases that absorb infrared radiation in the atmosphere. The greenhouse effect is a natural process that contributes to regulating the Earth’s temperature. Global climate change concerns are focused on whether human activities are leading to an enhancement of the greenhouse effect. Principal GHGs include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide, O3, and water vapor. The effect each GHG has on climate change is measured as a combination of the mass of its emissions and the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere, known as its global warming potential, which varies among GHGs. Total GHG emissions are expressed as a function of how much warming would be caused by the same mass of CO2.

Thus, GHG emissions are typically measured in terms of metric tons (MT) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e). Global climate change is a cumulative impact; a project participates in this potential impact through its incremental contribution combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs (CNRA 2009).

The proposed project includes relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a sound wall on the Hanson lot that extends from the existing wall on the SCD lot, and relocation of the fire lane. Construction assumptions are presented in Section 3.3. Table 6 presents the estimated annual construction emissions generated during construction of the proposed project changes (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a sound wall on the Hanson lot, and relocation of the fire lane) and the estimated annual construction emissions from the City Yards Master Plan EIR.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 50 MAY 2022
Table 6. Estimated Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Year
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Metric Tons per Year
City Yards Master Plan EIR
2019 161.17 0.03 0.00 161.83
2020 579.53 0.09 0.00 581.89
2021 376.76 0.06 0.00 369.25
2022 371.50 0.05 0.00 372.86
2023 256.14 0.04 0.00 257.13
2024 205.51 0.04 0.00 206.42
2025 218.84 0.03 0.00 219.62
2026 262.37 0.04 0.00 263.38
2027 86.26 0.02 0.00 86.66
Transfer Facility Addendum
2022 43.39 0.01 0.00 44.04
Total Emissions 2,563.08
Notes: CO2 = carbon dioxide; CH4 = methane; N2O = nitrogen dioxide; CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent; EIR = Environmental Impact Report.

See Appendix A for complete results.

As shown in Table 6, the proposed project changes would generate a total of approximately 44 MT CO2e during construction, and when added to the construction emissions estimated in the City Yards Master Plan EIR of approximately 2,519 MT CO2e, would total approximately 2,563 MT CO2e.

Per the SCAQMD guidance, construction emissions should be amortized over the operational life of the proposed project, which is assumed to be 30 years (SCAQMD 2008b). Amortized construction emissions are estimated to be approximately 85 MT CO2e and are discussed under Operational Impacts, below.

Operation of the City Yards Master Plan, as assessed in the EIR, would result in GHG emissions through area sources; energy use (natural gas and generation of electricity consumed by the project); solid waste disposal; water supply, treatment, and distribution and wastewater treatment; stationary sources (emergency generators); off-road equipment (forklifts); and fire department training. Notably, it was assumed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR that motor vehicle trips would be reduced due to the removal of the Santa Monica Recycling Center/buy-back center.

Operation of the proposed project changes assessed in this addendum is anticipated to generate minimal GHG emissions from off-road equipment and potential energy use from lighting (electricity); no area sources, mobile source, solid waste, water and wastewater, or stationary source emissions are anticipated.

The project is not anticipated to generate a net increase in vehicle trips from employees or trucks as explained in Section 3.3(b).

Table 7 presents the estimated operational GHG emissions associated with the operation of the proposed project changes (transfer facility relocation, year 2022) plus operation of the City Yards Master Plan Project as evaluated in the City Yards Master Plan EIR (year 2028) and estimated existing emissions in 2019 as evaluated in the City Yards Master Plan EIR to estimate the net change in GHG emissions. Details of the emission calculations are provided in Appendix A.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 51 MAY 2022
Table 7. Estimated Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emission Source
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Metric Tons per Year
Existing City Yards Facilities
Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy (natural gas and
electricity)
392.22 0.02 0.00 393.76
Mobile — — — —
Solid waste 7.58 0.45 0.00 18.77
Water supply and wastewater 82.76 0.53 0.01 99.78
Existing City Yards Facilities Total 482.56 1.00 0.01 512.32 Proposed Project
City Yards Master Plan EIR
Area 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
Energy (natural gas and
electricity)
862.03 0.04 0.01 865.93
Mobile — — — —
Solid waste 8.22 0.49 0.00 0.36
Water supply and wastewater 93.71 0.66 0.02 115.18
Emergency generators — — — 2.84
Forklifts — — — 127.12
Fire Department training — — — 2.87
City Yards Master Plan EIR
Subtotal
936.97 1.19 0.03 1,114.31
Transfer Facility Addendum
Area — — — —
Energy (natural gas and
electricity)

1.35 0.00 0.00 1.36
Mobile — — — —
Solid waste — — — —
Water supply and wastewater — — — —
Off-road equipment 266.17 0.09 0.00 268.32
Transfer Facility Addendum
Subtotal
267.52 0.09 0.00 269.68
Construction (EIR and Addendum
Combined, amortized over 30
years)
— — — 85.44
Total (With Amortized
Construction Emissions)
— — — 1,469.43

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 52 MAY 2022
Table 7. Estimated Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emission Source
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Metric Tons per Year
Net Project Emissions
Net Project Emissions (project buildout minus existing City Yards facilities) 957.11 SCAQMD GHG Threshold 10,000
Exceeds thresholds? No
Notes: CO2 = carbon dioxide; CH4 = methane; N2O = nitrogen dioxide; CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent; EIR = Environmental Impact Report; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District.

See Appendix A for complete results.

GHG emissions from the City Yards Master Plan EIR are based on the “mitigated” CalEEMod outputs to incorporate water reduction consistent with California Green Building Standards (CALGreen) and compliance with the City of Santa Monica’s Zero Waste goal of 85% by 2025. Because the traffic analysis determined that the proposed project would result in a minimal increase in vehicle trips to the project site, mobile emissions were not quantified.

Table 7 indicates that the net GHG emissions associated with development of the City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed project, would be below the SCAQMD GHG threshold of 10,000 MT CO2e per year.

Overall, the City Yards Master Plan would result in net operational emissions of approximately 957 MT CO2e, with the proposed project accounting for approximately 270 MT CO2e per year from operation.

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term operational impacts associated with the generation of GHG emissions would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project generate conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that the City Yards Master Plan would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.

At the time the City Yards Master Plan EIR was prepared, the City of Santa Monica 15×15 Climate Action Plan (CAP), published in February 2013, was the applicable GHG reduction plan (City of Santa Monica 2016). The CAP was developed to meet the City’s previous target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 15% below 1990 levels by the end of 2015. The 15×15 CAP identified 15 objectives and 34 actions to be completed by the end of fiscal year 2015. As indicated in the City’s published Final Report for the 15×15 CAP, the City exceeded this target by the end of 2015, achieving a 20% reduction from 1990 levels by reducing 35,592 MT CO2e, with 46% of the 15 objectives met and 55% of the 34 actions completed (City of Santa Monica 2016). Significant reductions were achieved through residential and commercial energy efficiency, solid waste diversion, and focusing new development around mass transit. The City Yards Master Plan was determined to not conflict with any of the GHG reducing measures or goals. Because the proposed project would include the relocation of the existing transfer facility, which would involve minimal construction activity associated with development of a sound wall, the proposed project would also not conflict with the CAP.

Furthermore, the City was in the process of developing a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, as well as to develop measures to adapt and prepare for unavoidable climate change impacts, when the City Yards Master Plan EIR was adopted. The CAAP was adopted in May 2019 (City of Santa Monica 2019). The CAAP establishes an interim goal of reducing carbon emissions 80% below 1990

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 53 MAY 2022
levels by 2030 to build momentum to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 or sooner. The CAAP focuses on eight objectives in three sectors: zero net carbon buildings, zero waste, and sustainable mobility. The CAAP also lays out a framework for increasing Santa Monica’s resilience to climate change through four sectors:
climate ready community, water self-sufficiency, coastal flooding preparedness, and low carbon food and ecosystems. The CAAP identifies areas in local government, community building, and support to augment by including climate change considerations and adaptation measures (City of Santa Monica 2019). As previously discussed, the changes to the proposed project would relocate the existing transfer facility to existing City Yards facilities and does not include the construction of new buildings and would result in minimal GHG emissions as shown in Table 7. Accordingly, the proposed project would not conflict with the CAAP.

As explained in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, at the regional level, SCAG has adopted the 2016–2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions attributable to passenger vehicles in the City and surrounding areas. Since the EIR was adopted, SCAG adopted the 2020–2045 RTP/SCS in September 2021. In addition to demonstrating the region’s ability to attain the GHG emission-reduction targets set forth by CARB, the 2020–2045 RTP/SCS outlines a series of actions and strategies for integrating the transportation network with an overall land use pattern that responds to projected growth, housing needs, changing demographics, and transportation demands (SCAG 2020). Although the RTP/SCS does not regulate land use or supersede the exercise of land use authority by SCAG’s member jurisdictions (e.g., the City), the RTP/SCS is a relevant regional reference document for purposes of evaluating the connection of land use and transportation patterns and the corresponding GHG emissions. The RTP/SCS is not directly applicable to the proposed project because the underlying purpose of the RTP/SCS is to provide direction and guidance on future regional growth (i.e., the location of new residential and non-residential land uses) and transportation patterns throughout the region, as stipulated under Senate Bill 375. The proposed project would involve redevelopment and renovation of existing facilities at the City Yards. Additionally, the proposed project would result in no net increase in vehicle trips to the project site. As such, the project would not conflict with the goals and policies of the RTP/SCS.

The Scoping Plan, approved by CARB on in 2008 and updated in 2014 and 2017, provides a framework for actions to reduce California’s GHG emissions and requires CARB and other state agencies to adopt regulations and other initiatives to reduce GHGs (CARB 2017). As such, the Scoping Plan is not directly applicable to specific projects. Under the Scoping Plan, however, there are several state regulatory measures aimed at the identification and reduction of GHG emissions. CARB and other state agencies have adopted many of the measures identified in the Scoping Plan. Most of these measures focus on area source emissions (e.g., energy usage, high global warming potential GHGs in consumer products) and changes to the vehicle fleet (e.g., hybrid, electric, and more fuel-efficient vehicles) and associated fuels (e.g., Low Carbon Fuel Standard), among others. To the extent that these regulations are applicable to the proposed project, the proposed project would comply with all regulations adopted in furtherance of the Scoping Plan to the extent required by law.

Regarding consistency with Senate Bill 32 (goal of reducing GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030) and Executive Order S-3-05 (goal of reducing GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050), there are no established protocols or thresholds of significance for that future-year analysis. However, CARB has expressed optimism with regard to both the 2030 and 2050 goals. It states in the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework that “California is on track to meet the near-term 2020 GHG emissions limit and is well-positioned to maintain and continue reductions beyond 2020 as

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 54 MAY 2022
required by AB [Assembly Bill] 32” (CARB 2014). CARB believes that the state is on a trajectory to meet the 2030 and 2050 GHG reduction targets set forth in Assembly Bill 32, Senate Bill 32, and Executive Order S- 3-05. The proposed project would not interfere with implementation of GHG reduction goals for 2030 or 2050 because it would not exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended threshold of 10,000 MT CO2e per year for industrial projects. Because the project would not exceed these thresholds, this analysis provides support for the conclusion that the project would not impede the state’s trajectory toward the previously described statewide GHG reduction goals for 2030 or 2050.

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term operational impacts associated with applicable GHG reduction plans, policies, or regulations would occur; the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with GHG emissions would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to GHG emissions.

3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 55 MAY 2022

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
d) Be located on a site that is included on
a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for people
residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 56 MAY 2022
Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
and
b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed changes, would be constructed in phases over an approximately 9-year period. The duration of the majority of construction phases would be greater than 1 year, and activities during phases would generally be concentrated in a specific area of the City Yards Site. Throughout the various phases a variety of hazardous substances and wastes would be transported to and stored, used, and handled on the City Yards Site.

Use of Hazardous Materials
As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, construction activities on the City Yards Site would involve the use and storage of a variety of hazardous materials, including fuel, oil, grease, solvents, and paints.

These materials would be handled, stored, used, and disposed of in accordance with all federal, state, and local laws regulating the management and use of hazardous materials. Improper handling and/or use of these materials during construction would represent a potential risk to the public and the environment.

Construction contractors are responsible for accident prevention and containment, and construction specifications typically include provisions to properly manage hazardous substances and wastes. All contractors are required to comply with applicable regulations and Occupational Safety and Health Administration guidelines regarding the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous waste. Examples of hazardous materials management include providing completely enclosed containment for all refuse generated in the planning area. In addition, all construction waste, including trash, litter,

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 57 MAY 2022
garbage, solid waste, petroleum products, and any other potentially hazardous materials, would be removed and transported to a permitted waste facility for treatment, storage, and/or disposal. Compliance with applicable regulations and Occupational Safety and Health Administration guidelines would ensure that proper use and disposal of these materials would not pose a significant risk to the public and the environment. In addition, the proposed project (inclusive of the proposed changes) would be required to comply with the Construction General Permit. This will require preparation of a SWPPP and development of best management practices (BMPs) for potential pollutants created by all phase of construction activity. As a result, the use of these hazardous materials for their intended use would not pose a significant threat.

Lead-Based Paint and Asbestos
The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not result in the demolition of any additional structures.

As such, there would be no additional demolition of existing structures, other than the demolition already assessed within the City Yards Master Plan EIR. The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined implementation of MM-HAZ-1 would be required to reduce potential impacts associated with exposure to asbestos and leadbased paint.

Contaminated Soils
The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. The characteristics of the subsurface soils underlying the project area would remain unchanged from those discussed in the EIR, and as such, no new or more severe impacts associated with contaminated soils would occur. The City Yards Site is listed as a leaking underground storage tank closed cleanup site case due to impacts from former leaking tanks and has four existing permitted underground storage tanks (USTs). Therefore, MM-HAZ-2 is required to reduce impacts from potentially contaminated soils through preparation of a hazardous materials contingency plan.

Former Clay Pit and Landfill
The City Yards Site is located over a former clay pit and landfill. The only new construction associated with the relocation of the transfer facility would be the sound wall and it is not proposed in the landfill area. Thus, the characteristics of the subsurface soils underlying the site would remain unchanged from those discussed in the EIR, and no new or more severe impacts associated with impact of the former landfill would occur. The City Yards Master Plan would still be required to implement MM-HAZ-3 and MM-HAZ-4 to reduce potential for gas flow impacts related to the removal of the existing landfill gas control system.

Therefore, with implementation of MM-HAZ-1 through MM-HAZ-4, no new or more severe short-term construction impacts associated with creation of a hazard to the public or the environment due to hazardous materials would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 58 MAY 2022
more severe hazards or hazardous materials impacts. Routine operations at the City Yards Site would continue to involve the storage, use, and disposal of various hazardous materials, including chemical reagents, pesticides, solvents, fuels, paints, and cleansers. All hazardous materials generated and/or used on the project property would be managed in accordance with all relevant federal, state, and local laws, including the California Hazardous Waste Control Law (California Health and Safety Code Division 20, Chapter 6.5), Occupational Safety and Health Administration Standards, and the Hazardous Waste Control Regulations (22 CCR 4.5). Given compliance with these regulations, the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials would not pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

Therefore, with implementation of MM-HAZ-1 through MM-HAZ-4, no new or more severe long-term operational impacts associated with creation of a hazard to the public or the environment due to hazardous materials would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. Edison Language Academy is located at 2402 Virginia Avenue, approximately 450 feet south of the City Yards Site across from I-10 (Santa Monica Freeway). As discussed in Sections 3.9(a) and 3.9(b), construction and operations would result in the handling of hazardous materials. The proposed changes would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to the handling of hazardous materials. The relocation of the transfer facility would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to operational hazards because the transfer facility occurred under the existing conditions analyzed in the previously certified EIR. The construction of the proposed sound wall would not result in operational impacts.

Therefore, with implementation of MM-HAZ-1 and MM-HAZ-2, no new or more severe impacts associated with emitting or handling hazardous materials within 0.25 miles of a school would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
d) Would the project be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The provisions in California Government Code Section 65962.5 are commonly referred to as the “Cortese List” (after the legislator who authored the legislation that enacted it). The list, or a site’s presence on the list, has bearing on the local permitting process, as well as on compliance with CEQA.

The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site, analyzed within the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and the adjacent SCD lot. The City Yards Site is listed in 22 regulatory databases. Additionally, there were several generations of USTs at the City Yards Site. In total, 20 USTs have been recorded at the site. Ten were removed in 1987, and six were removed in 1999. There are currently four USTs permitted at the subject property (three 6,500-gallon USTs and one 6,000- gallon UST).

Diesel fuel is stored in two 6,500-gallon USTs; gasoline is stored in one 6,500-gallon UST and one 6,000-

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 59 MAY 2022
gallon UST. Although the leaking underground storage tank case was closed in May 2013, there is the possibility of residual contamination in place in soils, and there may be locations on the project site with previously unidentified contamination.

Therefore, with implementation of MM-HAZ-2, no new or more severe impacts associated with hazardous materials sites would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? and
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. No private airstrips are located near the City Yards Site.

The City Yards Site is located in the vicinity of the Santa Monica Municipal Airport. The Santa Monica Municipal Airport is located approximately 1.7 miles southeast of the project site. However, the City Yards Site is not identified as being located within the Airport Influence Area for the Santa Monica Municipal Airport (ALUC 2003). Furthermore, the City and the Federal Aviation Administration signed a settlement agreement that will lead to the eventual closure of the Santa Monica Municipal Airport after 2028 (FAA 2017). The City Yards Site is approximately 6 miles from the Los Angeles International Airport and is not within the Los Angeles International Airport Influence Area (ALUC 2003).

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with public airport and private airstrip hazards would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
g) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not include the construction of new buildings and construction activities that would impair an emergency evacuation plan. Construction associated with the implementation of the proposed project (inclusive of the proposed changes) could result in a temporary increase in construction in the area surrounding the City Yards Site. The fire lane that currently bisects the Hanson lot would be moved to a location north of the Hanson lot that connects to the fire access gate at the mobile home park. However, all access to local roads would be maintained during construction of the proposed project; therefore, emergency access would be ensured and would not interfere with an emergency evacuation plans.

Additionally, although implementation of the proposed project would result in a change in on-site circulation, there would not be significant impacts to evacuation plans. New buildings would be developed in accordance with the CBC and California Fire Code requirements that address building safety and emergency exits.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 60 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with emergency response or evacuation plans would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
h) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Site and SCD lot are located in an urbanized portion of the City with surrounding commercial, residential, and industrial uses. The closest wildlands are north of the City near the Will Rogers Historic State Park, approximately 6 miles away. Due to the intervening development between the project site and Will Rogers Historic State Park, the proposed project inclusive of the proposed change would not expose people or structures to wildland fires.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with wildland fires would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR required the following applicable mitigation measures related to hazards and hazardous materials, which remain applicable:

MM-HAZ-1 Prior to demolition or renovation of on-site buildings, a lead-based paint and asbestos survey shall be conducted by a California Occupational Safety and Health Administration-certified asbestos consultant and/or certified site surveillance technician and a California Department of Public Health-certified lead inspector/risk assessor or sampling technician. A report documenting material types, conditions, and general quantities shall be provided, along with photos of positive materials and diagrams. Demolition or renovation plans and contract specifications shall incorporate any abatement procedures for the removal of material containing asbestos or lead-based paint. All abatement work shall be done in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations.

MM-HAZ-2 A hazardous materials contingency plan shall be followed during demolition, excavation, and construction activities for the proposed project. The hazardous materials contingency plan shall include, at a minimum, the following:
▪ Identification of known and suspected areas with hazardous waste and/or hazardous materials of concern
▪ Procedures for temporary cessation of construction activity and evaluation of the level of environmental concern
▪ Procedures for restricting access to the contaminated area except for properly trained personnel

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 61 MAY 2022
▪ Procedures for notification and reporting, including internal management and local agencies (e.g., Santa Monica Fire Department, County of Los Angeles Fire Department), as needed ▪ Health and safety measures for removal and excavation of contaminated soil ▪ Procedures for characterizing and managing excavated soils ▪ Procedures for certification of completion of remediation ▪ Regulatory considerations
▪ Worker health and safety plan for management of contaminated materials Site workers shall be familiar with the hazardous materials contingency plan and should be fully trained on how to identify suspected contaminated soil.

MM-HAZ-3 Per South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1150, an excavation management plan should be submitted for approval before excavation of a landfill. The excavation management plan should include information regarding the quantity and characteristics of the material to be excavated and transported, identify mitigation measures to be enacted as necessary during excavation to ensure that a public nuisance condition does not occur (e.g., gas collection and disposal, encapsulation, covering of the material, chemical neutralizing, or other measures), and include provisions for immediate cessation of excavation activities if there is a public nuisance.

MM-HAZ-4 If construction activities would impact the landfill, prior to obtaining grading permits, soil shall be sampled and analyzed for metals. Sampling shall be conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory guidance documents. The soil testing will confirm the presence or absence of on-site contamination associated with past uses on the project site. Any soil that exceeds applicable and appropriate regulatory thresholds shall be delineated, remediated, and/or properly disposed of in accordance with Los Angeles County Certified Unified Program Agency requirements.

3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality

New Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards
or waste discharge requirements?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 62 MAY 2022

New Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such
that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing
land uses or planned land uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade
water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year
flood hazard area as mapped on a
federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard
area structures which would impede
or redirect flood flows?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 63 MAY 2022

New Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
i) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of
a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 64 MAY 2022
Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? and
c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? and
f) Would the project otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. Project construction would include earthwork activities that could potentially result in erosion, which subsequently could degrade downstream water quality and/or violate water quality standards.

Surface Water Quality
Since the City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed changes, would result in more than 1 acre of ground disturbance, the City Yards Master Plan would be required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater program’s Construction General Permit. The Construction General Permit requires development and implementation of a SWPPP. Among the required items that must be included in a SWPPP are project design features intended to protect against substantial soil erosion as a result of water and wind erosion, commonly known as BMPs. Typical BMPs include diverting off-site runoff away from the construction site, vegetating landscaped/vegetated swale areas, and placing perimeter straw wattles to prevent off-site erosion transport. Incorporation of BMPs would reduce both stormwater runoff and soil erosion impacts to acceptable levels, which would subsequently minimize the opportunity for impacts to downstream receiving waters.

Groundwater Quality
As a result of the City Yards Site’s historic use as a City vehicle fueling and maintenance facility, VOCs have been detected in groundwater underlying the site. Soil vapor extraction and air sparging were used at the project site to remove VOCs from soil and groundwater, and the case was closed with respect to regulatory oversight on May 16, 2013. In addition, chlorinated solvents have been detected in monitoring wells installed in association with the former on-site landfill. However, these solvent concentrations in groundwater appear to have been from off-site sources and not from the landfill. The landfill site was closed with respect to regulatory oversight on August 27, 2012.

Based on a liquefaction assessment completed for the region, the historically highest groundwater level beneath the site was approximately 40 feet below ground surface. In addition, geotechnical investigations at the site have encountered perched groundwater at depths ranging from 29 to 57 feet. Based on this depth to groundwater, it is unlikely that dewatering would be required during construction activities. Based

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 65 MAY 2022
on site closure regulatory status of the fueling facility and landfill, as well as the lack of groundwater anticipated in proposed excavations, impacts associated with groundwater contamination beneath the site would be less than significant.

Therefore, no new or more severe short-term construction impacts associated with water quality standards, existing drainage patterns, or stormwater drainage system capacity would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

However, the City Yards Master Plan would not result in a change in the City’s operations at the site. The relocation of the transfer facility would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to hydrology as the entire site including the retention of the transfer facility would be subject to the City’s Urban Runoff Management Ordinance. The proposed sound wall would not alter drainage and impact water quality. Additionally, the relocation of the fire lane would result in no change from the existing conditions.

Under existing conditions, runoff from approximately 11.9 acres of the City Yards Site is discharged into the sewer due to the industrial nature of the site and the water quality of the runoff. The City Yards Master Plan would improve water quality as compared to existing conditions. Under the City Yards Master Plan, a number of existing uncovered industrial-heavy uses and operations taking place outside would be contained within new buildings and concentrated within a particular area of the City Yards Site. Further, the City Yards Master Plan would include new open space/planted areas and vegetated swales, thus reducing the area of potential polluted runoff.

In addition, in accordance with Low Impact Development requirements for urban runoff, the first 0.75 inches of stormwater runoff would be captured via a combination of catch basins, area drains, roof/trench drains, and bioswales, and mechanically treated using methods such as Continuous Deflective Separator Stormwater Treatment technology, before it flows to the county’s 45-inch storm drain line. Further, in accordance with Chapter 7.10 of the SMMC, the City would be required to develop and implement a runoff mitigation plan for the City Yards Site, which would specify BMPs and other measures to reduce polluted runoff. Inclusion of BMPs per the runoff mitigation plan, in combination with compliance with existing regulations, would minimize polluted runoff.

The relocation of the transfer facility would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to hydrology as the entire site including the retention of the transfer facility would be subject to the City’s Urban Runoff Management Ordinance. The proposed sound wall would not alter drainage and impact water quality. Additionally, the relocation of the fire lane would result in no change from the existing conditions.

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term operational impacts associated with water quality standards, existing drainage patterns, or stormwater drainage system capacity would occur; the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; and no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 66 MAY 2022
b) Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned land uses for which permits have been granted)? Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The EIR analysis conducted for the City Yards Master Plan concluded that construction would not include dewatering; therefore, no impacts would occur to groundwater levels with respect to construction dewatering. Water used during demolition and construction for cleaning, dust control, and other uses would be nominal with respect to groundwater use. Therefore, construction activities would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies, lower the local groundwater table, or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan include the construction of the sound wall, which would similarly not require dewatering, and would result in nominal water use.

Therefore, no new or more severe short-term construction impacts associated with groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

Long-Term Operational Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan would not result in a change in the City’s operations at the site. The relocation of the transfer facility would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to groundwater because the transfer facility occurred under the existing conditions analyzed in the previously certified EIR and would be a minor change in location. The proposed sound wall would not necessitate a need for groundwater. Thus, the water demand generated by the proposed project would remain relatively unchanged, since the specific land uses and operations of the City Yards would remain unchanged. Therefore, no additional groundwater withdrawals beyond those currently allocated to serve the project site are anticipated, and groundwater levels would not be substantially affected during proposed project operations.

The City Yards Site is currently developed with buildings or paved, with the exception of relatively small landscape areas. Due to the relatively impermeable nature of the underlying cohesive native soils, the presence of a refuse landfill, and the potential for creating perched water zones within the landfill pit, infiltration of substantial amounts of stormwater into the underlying soils on the site, such as via a retention basin, is infeasible. Therefore, no change in groundwater recharge potential would occur.

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term operation impacts associated with groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 67 MAY 2022
d) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
and
e) Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the existing City Yards Site, which was previously analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR and the adjacent paved SCD lot.

As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would alter the existing drainage patterns of the project site with redevelopment of the buildings, introduction of new pervious surfaces/landscaped areas, and replacement/reconfiguration of on-site storm drains. However, under proposed project conditions, the City would implement a stormwater management approach to avoid discharge of stormwater runoff to the sewer system. Thus, 100% of stormwater runoff is assumed to discharge to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District’s 45-inch-diameter storm drain, which would result in an increase in peak storm flows of 25.51 cubic feet per second (cfs) for a 25-year storm event and

32.43 cfs for a 50-year storm event. However, stormwater runoff associated with precipitation events in excess of the first 0.75 inches of rain would drain to the storm drain in quantities in excess of existing site conditions. Based on a project-specific hydraulic analysis conducted for the City Yards Master Plan EIR by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the allowable discharge from the project site to the underlying 45-inch storm drain will be 2.436 cfs/acre (KPFF 2018). This amount is equivalent to an allowable peak flow of 35.81 cfs for the 14.7-acre site, which exceeds the anticipated 25-year storm event of 32.85 cfs.

As a result, the storm drain could accommodate project-related increases in stormwater runoff. The addition of activities on the SCD lot that are already existing would not substantially add additional sources of polluted runoff.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with runoff would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
g) Would the project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?? and
h) Would the project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
and
i) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR the City

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 68 MAY 2022
Yards Site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area or an area susceptible to flooding or inundation as a result of levee or dam inundation failure. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map (FEMA 2020), the City Yards Site is located outside of both a 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone (100-year floodplain) and 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone (500-year floodplain).

Additionally, the General Plan Safety Element defines risk in the City from inundation or flooding resulting from the failure of a dam or levee as “low.” In addition, Safety Element Policies 3.1 and 3.2 include design requirements and require site-specific evaluation and consideration of individual projects to ensure the risks associated with development within a dam inundation zone are minimized (City of Santa Monica 1995). The proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would not place structures on site that would impede or expose people or structures to risk of flooding.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with flooding would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
j) Would the project be susceptible to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, the City Yards Site is not located within a potential tsunami inundation area as identified in the Santa Monica Safety Element (City of Santa Monica 1995). Further, the City Yards Site and SCD lot are located approximately 2 miles inland from the coast. The possibility of a tsunami affecting the site is considered to be remote. Damage to the City Yards Site due to a seiche, a seismic-induced wave generated in a restricted body of water, is not likely at the site because no such bodies of water are located near the site. The proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would not be at risk to inundation from seiche, tsunami, or mudflow.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with tsunami, mudflow, or seiche would occur; the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with hydrology and water quality would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to hydrology and water quality.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 69 MAY 2022

3.11 Land Use and Planning

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established
community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to
the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project physically divide an established community? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. The project site is currently developed with City Yards facilities. The proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would reconfigure and redesign the City Yards to improve operations. The proposed project does not propose an extension of infrastructure or uses into established neighborhoods. Thus, implementation of the proposed changes would not physically divide an existing community.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 70 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with the physical division of an established community would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed locations for the changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the existing City Yards Site, analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and the adjacent SCD lot. The proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan EIR would remain consistent with the City’s Land Use and Circulation Element and SCAG goals of focusing land use changes in limited areas of the City near transit and along transportation corridors to preserve the City’s existing residential neighborhoods. The proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would be consistent with the policies and standards identified within the Land Use and Circulation Element and Zoning Ordinance to guide the proposed redevelopment.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with applicable land use plans, policies, and regulations would occur; the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; and no new mitigation measures are required. c) Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. There are no habitat conservation plans, natural community conservation plans, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans that apply to the City. Consequently, the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with an adopted habitat conservation plan would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with land use and planning would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to land use and planning.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 71 MAY 2022

3.12 Mineral Resources
New Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally-important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other
land use plan?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (No Impact)
b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? (No Impact) Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
and
b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot. As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, a portion of the City Yards Site was an abandoned clay-mining pit. After the clay quarries were depleted, the area was used as a landfill by the City. The landfill operated as a municipal solid waste and incinerator ash landfill from mid-1940s until December 1970. The City Yards Site was then developed with its existing industrial uses. As such, implementation of the proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource because the clay has been depleted and developed for more than 50 years.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 72 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with mineral resources would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with the mineral resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to mineral resources.

3.13 Neighborhood Effects
New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XIII. NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS – Would the project:
a) Have considerable effects on the City’s
residential neighborhoods?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Would the project have considerable effects on the City’s residential neighborhoods? (Less-ThanSignificant Impact) Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project have considerable effects on the City’s residential neighborhoods? No Substantial Change from the Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR concluded that neighborhood effects of the City Yards Master Plan would not result in significant impacts. In general, the City considers “neighborhood effects” to be the composite long-term effects of aesthetics, air quality, noise, land use, public safety, and transportation/traffic on residential uses in the neighborhood. As such, the potential for the proposed changes to result in new or more significant impacts is further discussed in Sections 3.1; 3.3; 3.11, Land Use and Planning; 3.14; 3.16, Public Services; and 3.18. As discussed herein, the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would not result in new or more severe impacts related to aesthetics, air quality, land use and planning, noise, public services, and transportation and circulation.

For further details, refer to each individual resource section.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 73 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with neighborhood effects would occur; the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with the neighborhood effects would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to neighborhood effects.

3.14 Noise

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XIV. NOISE – Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without
the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 74 MAY 2022

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
f) For a project located within the vicinity
of a private airstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise
levels?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the existing City Yards Site and the adjacent SCD lot. As analyzed in the EIR, impacts associated with noise from project-related construction activities would be less than significant with MMNOI-1, which requires, among other things, the scheduling of construction activities to avoid the simultaneous operation of construction equipment, properly operating and maintaining mufflers, a temporary construction noise barrier, and shutting off idling equipment.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 75 MAY 2022
Based on construction phasing and equipment assumptions provided by the City and CalEEMod default values (consistent with the air quality analysis [Section 3.3]), a spreadsheet version of the Federal Highway Administration’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA 2008) was used to estimate short-term noise levels from the proposed changes. As shown in Table 8, the proposed changes would result in lower construction noise levels overall relative to those estimated for the City Yards Master Plan, particularly for the noisiest phases. Construction noise levels associated with the proposed changes are estimated to be approximately 2 to 9 decibels lower than those from the City Yards Master Plan (depending upon construction phase), with two exceptions. Typical construction work during site preparation is predicted to create approximately the same noise level as originally predicted, and typical construction work during architectural coating is predicted to result in noise levels approximately 2 decibels higher than originally predicted; however, the levels during the architectural coating phase would still be relatively low and would still represent the quietest construction phase. As such, the proposed changes would not result in new significant impacts related to project construction, or the need for new mitigation measures.

However, construction noise from the proposed changes would still be considered relatively high compared to existing ambient noise levels in the project area and would thus still exceed the construction noise threshold identified in the certified EIR.3 However, as with the approved project, implementation of MMNOI-1 from the certified EIR would result in substantial decreases in noise from construction. These measures require that standard construction noise reduction measures (such as ensuring that mufflers are in good working order, shutting off idling equipment, use of temporary noise barriers, locating staging areas as far as possible from noise-sensitive uses, etc.) are implemented. As described in the certified EIR, when put together, the noise reduction measures set forth in MM-NOI-1 would result in substantial decreases in noise from construction. As such, impacts would be reduced and would be less than significant with mitigation. The proposed changes would not result in new significant impacts, nor would they result in substantial increases in the severity of impacts or the need for new mitigation measures in the category of construction noise.

Table 8. Construction Noise Model Results Summary
Construction Phase
Comparison of Construction Noise at Representative Receiver Distances (Leq [dBA]) 1 Approved Project Modified Project
Noise Level Difference
(Approved Project vs.

Modified Project)
Nearest
Construction
Work
(25 Feet
Approx.)
Typical
Construction
Work
(160 Feet
Approx.)
Nearest
Construction
Work
(25 Feet
Approx.)2
Typical
Construction
Work
(100 Feet
Approx.)
Nearest
Construction
Work
(25 Feet
Approx.)
Typical
Construction
Work
(160 vs. 100
Feet Approx.)
Demolition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Site Preparation 90 74 87 74 −3 0
Grading 87 71 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Building Construction 90 71 81 67 −9 −4
3 As discussed on page 4.11-21 of the certified EIR, the applicable construction noise threshold for construction noise is 75 dBA Leq.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 76 MAY 2022
Table 8. Construction Noise Model Results Summary
Construction Phase
Comparison of Construction Noise at Representative Receiver Distances (Leq [dBA]) 1 Approved Project Modified Project
Noise Level Difference
(Approved Project vs.

Notes: Leq = sound equivalent level; dBA = A-weighted decibels. 1 Values shown represent a comparison of the unmitigated construction noise estimates for the originally proposed project first phase (from Table 4.11-8 of the Draft EIR) to the unmitigated construction noise of the proposed changes. Note that the noise analysis conservatively assumes there would be no intervening noise barriers. 2 The nearest sensitive receptors are the residential uses at the Mountain View mobile home park located approximately 25 feet to the east of the project site.

Therefore, with implementation of MM-NOI-1, no new or more severe short-term construction impacts associated with noise would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Long-Term Operational Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that long-term onsite noise associated with the City Yards operations would be less than significant based upon the elimination or relocation of the buy-back center, the fact that the overall functionality and activities on site would be unchanged, and the construction of new structures that would provide noise reduction between the activity noise and the residences to the southeast.

In order to determine the extent of potential noise impacts resulting from the proposed changes, a series of noise measurements were conducted in and adjacent to the Hanson lot and the SCD lot, as shown in Figure 5, Noise Measurement Locations, and documented in Appendix B. The proposed project changes would consist primarily of a relocation of the City’s tip and transfer facility from its current location at City Yards south of the Fire Department Training area to the Hanson and SCD lots. Moving these operations substantially closer to the nearest noise-sensitive uses (i.e., the mobile homes to the east of the project site) has the potential to increase noise levels beyond those assessed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR and to potentially exceed applicable City noise standards.

The normally acceptable sound level is 60 decibels for residential uses, with up to 70 decibels being conditionally acceptable. In order to reduce noise levels resulting from the relocation of the tip and transfer activities closer to the mobile homes, a noise barrier (also known as a sound wall) would be constructed as part of the proposed changes. As described in Section 2.3.2, Proposed Sound Wall, and shown in Figure 3, the sound wall would be constructed from the existing 14-foot-high wall on the SCD lot to the northeast corner of the Hanson lot. The sound wall would have an overall height of 12 feet and would be approximately

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 77 MAY 2022
150 to 200 feet long. In concert with the existing wall on the SCD lot, the sound wall on the Hanson Lot would effectively ensure that noise levels from the proposed project changes are not increased substantially above those analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR and do not exceed City noise standards (please see Appendix B for detailed analysis data and discussion).

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term operational impacts associated with noise would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that impacts related to groundborne vibration during construction would be less than significant. Based on the assumption that construction would take place within approximately 25 feet of the nearest sensitive receptor, vibration from construction would be well below the California Department of Transportation threshold of “distinctly perceptible” (0.24 inches per second peak particle velocity), as well as the threshold for structural damage (0.5 inches per second peak particle velocity or greater for buildings of reinforced-concrete, steel, or timber construction). Additionally, vibration from construction is exempt from the City’s municipal code.

Under the proposed project changes, the associated construction activities would be less intensive (i.e., fewer pieces and types of equipment, overall) than anticipated for the City Yards Master Plan EIR. Additionally, the construction activities from the proposed project changes would take place within approximately 25 feet or more of the nearest noise-and vibration-sensitive uses (the mobile home park residences to the east); thus, the estimated vibration levels would be the same as or less than the analysis previously conducted.

Therefore, no new or more severe short-term vibration impacts associated with construction noise would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Long-Term Operational Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan EIR found that impacts related to groundborne vibration during operation would be less than significant. Based upon the assumption that heavy equipment would likely be used to periodically move and load materials around the site or onto/off of trucks within 50 feet of the nearest residences, the vibration level from operations activity would be approximately 0.032 inches per second peak particle velocity and would thus be less than either the California Department of Transportation or the City thresholds of perceptibility. Furthermore, the vibration from moving vehicles is exempt from the City’s municipal code. Vibration during operation was determined to be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Under the proposed project changes, the nearest anticipated heavy equipment usage would remain at approximately 50 feet or more from the nearest noise-and vibration-sensitive uses (the residences to the southeast); thus, the estimated worst-case vibration levels would be the same as for the analysis previously conducted.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 78 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe long-term vibration impacts associated with operation noise would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
c) Would the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As discussed in Section 3.14(a), a sound wall would be constructed as part of the proposed project changes. The sound wall would substantially reduce noise levels from the proposed relocation of tip and transfer activities and construction of the wall would not exceed City noise standards (please see Appendix B for detailed analysis data and discussion).

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with noise would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. d) Would the project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As discussed in Section 3.14(a), construction associated with the proposed changes would utilize machinery that would generate noise. However, the construction activities would take place within approximately 25 feet or more of the nearest noise- and vibration-sensitive uses (the residences to the east), which is the same distance assessed for the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and for the most part would be less intensive, resulting in lower noise levels; thus, the estimated noise levels would be approximately the same or lower than the analysis previously conducted.

Therefore, with implementation of MM-NOI-1, no new or more severe impacts associated with noise would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
and
f) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. As analyzed in the EIR, the City Yards Master Plan would not expose people to excessive noise levels from a private airstrip. The project site is located in the vicinity of the Santa Monica Municipal Airport. The Santa Monica Municipal Airport is located approximately 1.7 miles southeast of the project site.

However, the project site is not identified as being located within the Airport Noise Contour Area of the Santa Monica Airport (ALUC 2003). The project site is located approximately 1 mile from the northwest edge of the Airport Noise Contour Area. Furthermore, the City and the Federal Aviation Administration signed a settlement agreement that will lead to the eventual closure of the Santa Monica Municipal Airport after 2028 (FAA 2017). The project site is approximately 6 miles north of Los Angeles International Airport and is not within the Los Angeles International Airport Influence Area (ALUC 2003). No private airstrips are located in the project area. The nearest active public-use airport to the project site is Ontario International Airport, which is located approximately 7 miles west, well outside of the project area.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 79 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with public airport and private airstrip noise would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, with implementation of MM-NOI-1, no new or more severe impacts associated with the noise would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR required the following applicable mitigation measures related to noise, which remain applicable:

MM-NOI-1 The City shall adhere to the following measures for all phases of the proposed project as a condition of approving the grading permit:
i. The project contractor shall, to the extent feasible, schedule construction activities to avoid the simultaneous operation of construction equipment so as to minimize noise levels resulting from operating several pieces of high-noise-level-emitting equipment. ii. All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers. Enforcement shall be accomplished by random field inspections by City personnel during construction activities.
iii. A temporary construction noise barrier shall be erected at the southeasterly project boundary between the adjacent residences and the project site. The construction noise barrier shall be a minimum of 10 feet in height, have a surface density of at least 4 pounds per square foot, and be free of gaps or openings.
iv. Construction noise reduction methods such as shutting off idling equipment, maximizing the distance between construction equipment staging areas and adjacent residences, and use of electric air compressors and similar power tools, rather than diesel equipment, shall be used where feasible.
v. During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from or shielded from sensitive receptors. vi. As specified in Section 4.12.120 of the City’s Municipal Code, signage shall be posted at the project site entrance with permitted construction work hours, telephone numbers where violations can be reported, the location of the job site, and the permit number issued authorizing the work.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 80 MAY 2022

3.15 Population and Housing

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XV. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned
population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of
existing people, necessitating the
construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project inclusive of the proposed changes consists of redesign and reconstruction of the City Yards Site. The proposed project would not replace the

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 81 MAY 2022
current industrial uses with new businesses and no development of housing is proposed. The proposed improvements are not an expansion of capacity and would not directly induce population growth in the area.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with population growth would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
and
c) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the City Yards Site and the adjacent SCD lot which are both zoned Industrial Conservation.

No housing exists on the City Yards Site, and as such, no displacement of housing or people would occur.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with the displacement of housing or people would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with population and housing would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to population and housing.

3.16 Public Services

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XVI. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

Fire protection?
Police protection?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 82 MAY 2022

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
i. Fire protection? (Less-Than-Significant Impact)
ii. Police protection? (Less-Than-Significant Impact)
iii. Schools? (No Impact)
iv. Parks? (Less-Than-Significant Impact)
v. Other public facilities? (No Impact)
Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

Fire protection?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not result in any new operations on the City Yards Site or increase in the demand for fire protection services when compared to the existing conditions. Therefore, the proposed changes would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to fire protection services. In addition, the proposed project would not induce substantial population growth, either directly or indirectly, such that additional fire protection would be needed.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with fire protection would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 83 MAY 2022
Police protection?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As previously discussed in Section 3.16(a), the proposed changes would not result in any new operations on the City Yards Site or increase in the demand for police protection services when compared to the existing conditions. Therefore, the proposed changes would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to police protection services. In addition, the proposed project would result in reconstruction of the existing City Yards Site and would not expand the capacity of these uses such that additional population growth would occur and expansion of police services would be necessary.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with police protection facilities would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Schools?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would not result in any new operations on the City Yards Site and school demand when compared to the existing conditions. Therefore, the proposed changes would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to schools. The proposed project would not result in growth in the City’s employee population nor would it include new residential uses that could impact schools. The City Yards Master Plan would result in the reconstruction of the City Yards Site, but would not increase student enrollment through the construction of new housing or expansion of the City’s workforce. As such, implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would not generate population growth or generate new students.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with school facilities would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Parks?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would not result in any new operations on the City Yards Site and demand for parks when compared to the existing conditions. Therefore, the proposed changes would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to parks. Given the lack of population growth as a result of the City Yards Master Plan, neither construction nor operation of the proposed project would generate new residents to the extent that new or expanded park facilities would be required.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with recreational facilities would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

Other public facilities?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would not result in any new operations on the City Yards Site when compared to the existing conditions.

Therefore, the proposed changes would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 84 MAY 2022
Master Plan EIR with regard to other public facilities. Implementation of the proposed project would not impact libraries or other public facilities. The project as proposed would not generate new permanent residents in the City who would use public facilities. As such, the City Yards Master Plan would not increase demand in capacity of existing libraries or other public facilities.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with other public facilities would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with public services would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to public services.

3.17 Recreation

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XVII. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities
such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 85 MAY 2022
Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? and
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. Implementation of the City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed changes, would not directly or indirectly induce population growth in the City as the City Yards Site and adjacent SCD lot would continue to be used for municipal/industrial purposes. Neither construction nor operation of the proposed project would generate new residents to the extent that use of existing parks and recreational facilities would increase and result in the physical deterioration of these facilities.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with recreational facilities would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with recreation facilities would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to recreation.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 86 MAY 2022

3.18 Transportation and Circulation

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XVIII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC – Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan,
ordinance, or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation system,
taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit
and non-motorized travel and relevant
components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths,
and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but
not limited to level of service standards
and travel demand measures, or other
standards established by the county
congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic
patterns, including either an increase
in traffic levels or a change in location
that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency
access?
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or
programs regarding public transit,
bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or
otherwise decrease the performance or
safety of such facilities?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 87 MAY 2022
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The City Yards Master Plan would be constructed in phases over an approximately 9-year period. The only new construction resulting from the relocation of the transfer facility would be construction of a sound wall located on the Hanson lot, which is the southeastern portion of the City Yards Site. Due to the relatively short-term nature of the construction of the sound wall, the construction-related vehicle trips would be nominal and would not contribute significantly to long-term traffic congestion. However, it was found in the EIR that increased construction traffic on streets related to the overall City Yards construction could disrupt traffic flows, reduce lane capacities, and generally slow traffic movement. Therefore, implementation of MM-TRA-1 would require preparation of a Construction Impact Mitigation Plan to address construction traffic routing and control, vehicular and pedestrian safety, pedestrian/bicycle access and parking, street closures, and construction parking.

Therefore, with implementation of MM-TRA-1, no new or more severe short-term construction impacts associated with conflicting with an applicable circulation plan, ordinance or policy, including the regional

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 88 MAY 2022
congestion management program, would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

Long-Term Operational Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The previously certified EIR concluded that traffic impacts would be less than significant. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not significantly alter the traffic conditions from what was assessed in the EIR. The relocation of the transfer facility to a different area within the City Yards Site and the adjacent SCD lot would not change the conclusions made in the EIR because the trips that were previously assessed would not change due to the proposed changes.

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term operational impacts associated with conflicting with an applicable circulation plan, ordinance or policy, including the regional congestion management program, would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As the congestion management agency for Los Angeles County, Metro is responsible for implementation of the Congestion Management Plan. As analyzed in the EIR, none of the four Congestion Management Plan intersections are located in the project area, and as such, would not be adversely affected by the proposed project.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with an appliable congestion management plan would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
c) Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are located within the City Yards Site. The City Yards Site is located approximately 1.7 miles northwest of the Santa Monica Municipal Airport. However, the project site is not located within the Airport Influence Area for the Santa Monica Airport. Additionally, the proposed project inclusive of the changes would not change air traffic patterns.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with air traffic patterns would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 89 MAY 2022
d) Would the project Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As analyzed in the EIR, the on-site improvements resulting from implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would be designed in accordance with all applicable design standards, including those addressing Americans with Disabilities Act accessibility, adequate width, and adequate turning radius. The only new construction associated with the proposed changes would be the sound wall, which is not considered a hazardous or incompatible feature and moving the fire lane for better access to the mobile home park. In addition, all site plans would be reviewed by the City’s Mobility Division and Traffic Engineering Division for adequate line-of-sight provision at driveways, so no structures or landscaping block the views of vehicles entering and exiting a site. Specifically, the proposed project would be subject to the Municipal Code Section 9.04.10.08.060(d), which states, “the design, location or position of any parking layout, entry, driveway, approach, or access from any street or alley shall be approved by the Parking and Traffic Engineer.” Site plan approval from the City’s Transportation Management Division would ensure that site access provides sufficient egress for trucks and emergency vehicles prior to approval. As such, no sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or incompatible uses would be introduced by the proposed project.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with hazardous design features would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
e) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, the City Yards Site is located in an established, developed area with ample access for emergency service providers.

The project site would be accessible through two main points of entry on Frank Street (one into the Hanson lot and one into the SCD lot). The proposed project’s driveways would be designed and constructed to City standards and comply with City width, clearance, and turning-radius requirements including those for emergency vehicles. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan (relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of fire lane) would not alter emergency access from that analyzed in the EIR. The City Yards Site would be accessible to emergency responders during construction and operation of the proposed project. However, under the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan, the fire lane that currently bisects the Hanson lot would be moved to a location north of the Hanson lot that connects to the fire access gate at the mobile home park, therefore, adequate emergency access would continue to be provided.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with emergency access would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
f) Would the project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As analyzed in the EIR, implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would not physically preclude implementation of any regional or local policies, plans, or programs

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 90 MAY 2022
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. The proposed project modifications also would not change public transit, bicycle facilities or pedestrian facilities in the project area.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities would occur; the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with transportation and traffic would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR required the following applicable mitigation measures related to transportation and circulation, which remain applicable:

MM-TRA-1 The City shall prepare, implement and maintain a Construction Impact Mitigation Plan for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit to address and manage traffic during construction and shall be designed to:
▪ Prevent traffic impacts on the surrounding street network Ensure safety for both those constructing the proposed project and the surrounding community. ▪ Prevent substantial truck traffic through residential neighborhoods ▪ Provide coordination with adjacent or nearby construction projects The Construction Impact Mitigation Plan shall be subject to review and approval by the following City departments: Public Works, Fire, Planning and Community Development, and Police to ensure that the Plan has been designed in accordance with this mitigation measure and meets City standards. This review shall occur prior to issuance of grading or building permits. It shall, at a minimum, include the following:

Ongoing Requirements throughout the Duration of Construction ▪ A detailed Construction Impact Mitigation Plan for work zones shall be maintained. At a minimum, this shall include parking and travel lane configurations; warning, regulatory, guide, and directional signage; and area sidewalks, and parking lanes. The plan shall include specific information regarding the project’s construction activities that may disrupt normal pedestrian and traffic flow and the measures to address these disruptions. Such plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Strategic and Transportation Planning Division prior to commencement of construction and implemented in accordance with this approval. ▪ Work within the public right-of-way shall be performed between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. This work includes dirt and demolition material hauling and construction material delivery. Work within the public right-of-way outside of these hours shall only be allowed after the issuance of an afterhours construction permit.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 91 MAY 2022
▪ Streets and equipment shall be cleaned in accordance with established Public Works Department requirements.
▪ Trucks shall only travel on a City-approved construction route. Truck queuing/staging shall not be allowed on Santa Monica streets. Limited queuing may occur on the construction site itself. ▪ Materials and equipment shall be minimally visible to the public; the referred location for materials is to be on site, with a minimum amount of materials within a work area in the public right-of-way, subject to a current Use of Public Property Permit. ▪ Any requests for work before or after normal construction hours within the public right-of-way shall be subject to review and approval through the After Hours Permit process administered by the Building and Safety Division.
▪ Provision of off-street parking for construction workers, which may include the use of a remote location with shuttle transport to the site, if determined necessary by the City of Santa Monica.

Project Coordination Elements That Shall Be Implemented Prior to Commencement of Construction ▪ The City shall advise the traveling public of impending construction activities (e.g., information signs, portable message signs, media listing/notification, and implementation of an approved Construction Impact Mitigation Plan).
▪ The City shall provide timely notification of construction schedules to all affected agencies (e.g., Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Big Blue Bus, Police Department, Fire Department, Public Works Department, and Planning and Community Development Department) and to all owners and residential and commercial tenants of property within a radius of 500 feet. ▪ The City shall coordinate construction work with affected agencies in advance of start of work.

Approvals may take up to 2 weeks per each submittal.

3.19 Tribal Cultural Resources

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XIX. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k)?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 92 MAY 2022

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1? In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? (Less-ThanSignificant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated) ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? (Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated)

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 93 MAY 2022
Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of a fire lane would not result in the demolition of any structures. As such, there is no new demolition of existing structures proposed, other than the demolition already assessed within the City Yards Master Plan EIR. The City Yards, the adjacent property, and all associated buildings and structures were found not eligible under all National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, and City designation criteria. Therefore, the property is not considered an historical resource for the purposes of CEQA.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with listed or eligible historical resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan would be located within the existing construction footprint previously analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. Thus, site-specific information analyzed in the EIR applies to the proposed project. No cultural resources were identified within or adjacent to the City Yards Site as a result of the California Historical Resources Information System records search, Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File search, or the Native American consultation efforts conducted for the City Yards Master Plan EIR by the City. Further, the project site was previously used as a clay and mining pit from at least 1905 to until 1935 and a landfill from 1947 to 1970. These previous uses involved a significant amount of ground-disturbing activities, resulting in the site being underlain by refuse fill up to 60 feet in depth. Any tribal resources would have been significantly disturbed.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with tribal cultural resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR; no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 94 MAY 2022
Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with tribal cultural resources would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to tribal cultural resources.

3.20 Utilities and Service Systems

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental
effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources,
or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
e) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate
the project’s solid waste disposal
needs?

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 95 MAY 2022

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
and
e) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As proposed, the City intends to modernize City Yards operations through the construction of new structures that would be similar in scale to existing structures.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 96 MAY 2022
However, the City Yards Master Plan would not result in a change in the City’s operations at the site. The proposed changes would not change the previous determination made by the City Yards Master Plan EIR with regard to wastewater treatment because operations would remain the same compared to the existing condition. Upon implementation of the City Yards Master Plan, the types of uses and operations on the site would not change from existing conditions. As such, wastewater quality would not be substantially different from existing conditions and wastewater flows are not anticipated to increase.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with wastewater treatment requirements or treatment capacity would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Wastewater Treatment Facilities
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the City Yards Site, analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. The City Yards Site is currently served by an existing 18-inch sewer line that runs through the site from Michigan Avenue to Stewart Street. This sewer line would be protected in place during construction. The proposed project would not involve appreciable changes to the City Yards Site or the adjacent SCD lot that would substantially increase wastewater generation such that the construction of a new sewer line or expansion of this sewer main would be required.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with wastewater treatment facilities would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Water Treatment Facilities
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the City Yards Site, analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. Currently, water is supplied to the City Yards Site via laterals connected to an 8-inch water main running east–west beneath Michigan Avenue along the northern border of the site to Stewart Street. Additionally, there is a 6-inch water main partly through the western portion of the site connecting to an 8-inch water main beneath Delaware Avenue/24th Street. The City Yards Master Plan project would cut and cap the existing 8-inch northern water line running east–west. Specifically, this line would be cut and capped at the eastern end of Michigan Avenue. The remaining segment of this line from this point to Stewart Street would be demolished. A replacement water line would be constructed to the north of this alignment. The 6-inch water main running north–south is anticipated to remain in place. Additionally, the City Yards Master Plan EIR assessed the installation of new domestic and fire water laterals to the existing water mains. Such connections would be installed within site boundaries and would be appropriately sized to serve the City Yards Site. Environmental effects associated with the construction of the proposed project’s water facilities including connections would be localized to within the site and were taken into account in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. Further, the proposed changes are not anticipated to require additional water supply, and new or expanded water treatment facilities would not be required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 97 MAY 2022
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with water treatment facilities would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
c) Would the project require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan are within the existing City Yards Site, analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. Therefore, the site-specific information analyzed in the EIR is applicable to the proposed locations for the tip and transfer activities and drainage impacts would remain unchanged from those discussed in the EIR.

Implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would alter the existing drainage patterns of the project site with redevelopment of the buildings, introduction of new pervious surfaces/landscaped areas, and replacement/reconfiguration of on-site storm drains. However, as assessed in the City Yards EIR, the City would implement a stormwater management approach to avoid discharge of stormwater runoff to the sewer system. Thus, 100% of stormwater runoff is assumed to discharge to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District’s 45-inchdiameter storm drain, which would result in an increase in peak storm flows of 25.51 cfs for a 25-year storm event and 32.43 cfs for a 50-year storm event. However, stormwater runoff associated with precipitation events in excess of the first 0.75 inches of rain would drain to the storm drain in quantities in excess of existing site conditions. Based on a project-specific hydraulic analysis conducted for the City Yards Master Plan EIR by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the allowable discharge from the project site to the underlying 45-inch storm drain will be 2.436 cfs/acre (KPFF 2018). This amount is equivalent to an allowable peak flow of 35.81 cfs for the 14.7-acre site, which exceeds the anticipated 25- year storm event of 32.85 cfs. As a result, the storm drain could accommodate the proposed project modifications’ increases in stormwater runoff.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with stormwater drainage facilities would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
d) Would the project Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As proposed, the City intends to modernize City Yards operations through the construction of structures of similar scale. However, the City Yards Master Plan would not result in a change in the City’s operations at the site. Similarly, the proposed relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a new sound wall, and relocation of a fire lane would not result in any new operations when compared to the existing conditions with regard to water supply. Water demand generated by the implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would remain relatively unchanged with respect to the existing condition. Further, the proposed changes are not anticipated to require additional water demand.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with water supply would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 98 MAY 2022
f) Would the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?
Short-Term Construction Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. Construction of the City Yards Master Plan would generate construction and demolition waste such as asphalt and concrete. Any construction waste generated as a result of the relocation of the transfer facility and fire lane would comply with SMMC Chapter 8.108, requiring submission of a waste management plan and requiring 70% of all construction and demolition material generated by the proposed project to be diverted. Solid waste generated during construction of the proposed project modifications would result in very little solid waste generation and construction debris as there is no demolition of structures and the proposed sound wall is new construction.

Therefore, no new or more severe short-term impacts associated with permitted landfill capacity would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Long-Term Operational Impacts
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The transfer station would be relocated from the southwest corner of the City Yards Site to the Hanson and SCD lots. Thus, City Yards would continue to provide a recycling and transfer station, which would reduce the amount of waste within the City going directly to permitted landfills.

Therefore, no new or more severe long-term impacts associated with permitted landfill capacity would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
g) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. With the proposed changes to the City Yards Master Plan, City Yards would continue to provide tip and transfer processing, which would reduce the amount of waste within the City going directly to permitted landfills. Upon implementation of the proposed project, trash trucks would still operate in and out of the City Yards Site, as with current conditions. All collection, transportation, and disposal of municipal solid waste would continue would occur in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with solid waste statutes and regulations would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with utilities and service systems would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan. No new mitigation measures are required.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 99 MAY 2022
Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to utilities and service systems.

3.21 Energy

New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XXI. ENERGY – Would the project:
a) Result in a potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources
during project construction or
operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan, including construction and operation of the proposed project, would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis.

Short-Term Construction Impacts
Construction of the project may require the use of electric power for as-necessary lighting and electronic equipment. The amount of electricity used during construction would be limited to energy demand that typically stems from the use of electrically powered construction equipment. This electricity demand would be temporary and would cease upon completion of construction; thus, the project would not adversely

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 100 MAY 2022
impact the available electricity supply. During construction, natural gas is not anticipated to be consumed on the project site consistent with typical construction practices.

Petroleum would be consumed throughout construction of the project; however, it is anticipated to be minimal. Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over the course of construction. Vehicle miles traveled associated with the transportation of construction materials and construction worker commutes also would result in petroleum consumption. However, the project would be required to comply with CARB’s Airborne Toxics Control Measure, which restricts heavyduty diesel vehicle idling time to 5 minutes. In addition, the construction of the project would be a temporary, short-term activity, and any petroleum used during the construction phase would be used towards the development of the project; as such, petroleum use for construction would be relatively nominal and would not be wasteful or inefficient use of resources. Therefore, short-term construction impacts associated with project energy consumption would be less than significant.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with construction energy would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Long-Term Operational Impacts
The project involves relocation of the transfer facility, construction of a sound wall on the Hanson lot, and relocation of the fire lane. The proposed project is expected to minimally increase the on-site use of energy compared with the existing conditions associated with off-road equipment usage and potentially parking lot lighting. The project does not include operation of a new building, which typically demands energy use in the form of natural gas or electricity, including electricity for water conveyance, treatment, and distribution. The project also does not result in an increase in vehicular trips that would consume petroleum.

Of note, the transfer facility occurs under existing conditions, and as such would not increase energy usage within the City. In addition, the proposed sound wall would not require energy. With fire department facilities remaining, there would be no change from the existing conditions. Accordingly, the project would result in minor use of energy at the relocation site.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with operational energy would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As explained in 3.21(a), the project would consume minimal energy during construction, which would be temporary. During operation, the project would consume minimal energy associated with the use of off-road equipment and potential parking lot lighting.

Because the project does not involve construction of a building, it would not be subject to and thus, not conflict with energy plans related to buildings (e.g., Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations including the California Green Building Standards Code).

The proposed project as a whole, as evaluated in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, would include various sustainability features such as naturally ventilated spaces, high-SRI pavement, rooftop solar arrays, and water-saving features. With these features, the proposed project overall would provide opportunities for

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 101 MAY 2022
improved energy efficiency that would support state and local plans for increasing renewable energy efficiency. The project’s microgrid would allow for the generation/storage of 1.4 megawatts of renewable energy generated on site, which would support renewable energy efforts. Accordingly, the project and the City Yards Master Plan would not conflict with or obstruct a plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Therefore, no new or more severe impacts associated with the potential to conflict with energy plans would occur, the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Conclusion
In conclusion, no new or more severe impacts associated with energy would occur, and the level of impact would not change from the level identified in the City Yards Master Plan. No new mitigation measures are required.

Existing Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project The City Yards Master Plan EIR did not require any mitigation measures related to energy.

3.22 Mandatory Findings of Significance
New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
XXII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 102 MAY 2022
New
Significant
Impact
More Severe
Impacts
New Ability to
Substantially
Reduce
Significant
Impact
No Substantial
Change from
Previous
Analysis
c) Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Previous Significance Determination
The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that development in accordance with the City Yards Master Plan, including construction and operation of the proposed project, would result in the following:

Proposed Project Significance Determination
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. As analyzed in this Addendum, the proposed project would not degrade the quality of the environment. For the reasons discussed in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, the proposed project would not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal.

In addition, for the reasons identified in Section 3.6, Cultural Resources, of this document, the City Yards Site does not contain any important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, and no impacts to such resources would occur. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact as previously analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 103 MAY 2022
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. Similar to the project originally analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR, the City Yards Master Plan, including the proposed changes, has the potential to result in incremental environmental impacts, which would be reduced to less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures. The City Yards Master Plan EIR determined that no cumulative impacts were significant and unavoidable, and mitigation measures recommended in the EIR would reduce impacts associated with construction effects, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and transportation and circulation. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project with the proposed project modifications would not result in any new cumulative impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant cumulative impact as previously analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The implementation of the City Yards Master Plan would not create adverse environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. None of the proposed uses or activities would result in any substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, as discussed throughout this document. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a significant impact as previously identified and analyzed in the City Yards Master Plan EIR

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 104 MAY 2022
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change 13898 105 MAY 2022
4 Response to Comments
This chapter of the Addendum includes a copy of all comment letters that were submitted during the public review period for the Addendum to the City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2017111053) along with responses to comments in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15088. The public review period for Addendum began on February 4, 2022, and ended on March 6, 2022.

The City of Santa Monica (City) mailed a Notice of Availability to 888 recipients including agencies, tribes, commercial property owners, residents, and organizations. Property owners located within a 750-foot radius of the project site were also noticed. The City also posted the Addendum on its website.

All written comment letters received on the Addendum have been coded with a number to facilitate identification and tracking (see Table 9). These numbered comment letters were reviewed and divided into individual comments, with each comment containing a single theme, issue, or concern. Individual comments and the responses to them were assigned corresponding numbers (e.g., 2-1, 2-2, 2-3). Each numbered comment letter is the submittal of an individual, agency, or organization. To aid readers and commenters, electronically bracketed comments have been reproduced in this document, with the corresponding responses provided immediately following the comments. The interested parties listed in Table 9 submitted letters during the public review period for the Addendum.

Table 9. Comments Received on the Addendum
Commenter Date
Agencies
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery March 7, 2022 Individuals
Cris McLeod February 8, 2022
Cris McLeod March 6, 2022
To finalize the Addendum for the proposed project, the following responses have been prepared for comments that were received during the public review period. These responses will be distributed to the public agency commenters as required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(b) and the City as the lead agency.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 106 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 107 MAY 2022
Comment Letter 1

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 108 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 109 MAY 2022
Response to Comment Letter 1
Pico Neighborhood Association
Cris McLeod, Chair
February 8, 2022
1-1 This comment expresses general opposition to the Project but does not raise an issue with the adequacy of the Addendum to the Draft EIR. Section 15088(a) requires that a lead agency evaluate and respond to comments raising significant environmental issues on the Draft CEQA document.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 110 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 111 MAY 2022
Comment Letter 2

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 112 MAY 2022

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 113 MAY 2022

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 114 MAY 2022

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 115 MAY 2022
Response to Comment Letter 2
Pico Neighborhood Association
Cris McLeod, Chair
March 6, 2022
2-1 This comment expresses general opposition to the Project but does not raise an issue with the adequacy of the Addendum to the Draft EIR. Section 15088(a) requires that a lead agency evaluate and respond to comments raising significant environmental issues on the Draft CEQA document.

Because this comment does not raise environmental issues, no further response is necessary within this Final Addendum. Nonetheless, the City thanks the commenter for their comment and will forward the comment to the City’s decisionmakers for their consideration. 2-2 Please see response to comment 2-1
2-3 Please see response to comment 2-1
2-4 Please see response to comment 2-1
2-5 Please see response to comment 2-1

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 116 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 117 MAY 2022
Comment Letter 3

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 118 MAY 2022

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 119 MAY 2022

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 120 MAY 2022

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 121 MAY 2022
Response to Comment Letter 3
CalRecycle
Department of Resources Recovery and Recycling
Nai Teurn, Environmental Scientist
March 7, 2022
3-1 The City acknowledges this comment as an introduction to comments that follow. This comment is included in the Final Addendum for review and consideration by the decision makers prior to a final decision on the project. No further response is required or necessary. No changes to the Draft Addendum are required as a result of this comment and the Draft Addendum’s analysis is adequate as provided. 3-2 The statement about the services offered by the Resources, Recovery and Recycling Division is a general statement describing the services offered by the City’s Resources and Recycling Division, it was not referring specifically to the City of Santa Monica Transfer Facility, SWIS Number 19-AA-0008. The relocation of the transfer facility will not impact the current transfer facility, SWIS No. 19-AA-0008. The parameters requested are as follows and they remain the same:
▪ Address: 2500 Michigan Avenue, Santa Monica, CA 90404 ▪ Operator: Southern California Disposal; Owner: City of Santa Monica ▪ Hours of Operation: 5 am – 6 pm, Monday through Friday, 7 am – 4 pm Saturday ▪ Tonnage: <400 tpd
▪ Traffic/Vehicles per day: 10 – 20 trucks
▪ Acreage: 21,000 square feet
3-3 The Hanson Lot and SCD lot will continue to be separate, but will be used in a complimentary manner. SCD will utilize the Hanson Lot for equipment storage, queueing, and other related activities. The City of Santa Monica will tip their curbside recycling material on SCD’s property. At some time in the future, tip and load activities may occur on the Hanson Lot. Specifically, curbside recycling material and construction and demolition material. The plan is to use the City’s current transfer facility permit: SWIS No. 19-AA-0008 for accepting, storing, and loading construction and demolition material, dirt, and inert material. 3-4 The City will be accepting the same streams of material as currently permitted, with the addition of construction and demolition debris and large recyclable items. 3-5 The City thanks CalRecycle for pointing out an error on Figure 3. Figure 3, Existing Conditions, has been corrected to remove the proposed sound wall label in the legend. The bollards are listed twice because they appear in two different locations on the existing site. 3-6 The City notes the contact information for Dorcas Hanson-Lugo and will reach out to discuss the regulatory requirements for the project.
3-7 Thank you for your interest in this project. A public hearing on this project is scheduled for June 14, 2022.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 122 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change 13898 123 MAY 2022
5 Changes to the Addendum
Figure 3, Existing Conditions has been revised in response to a CalRecycle comment.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 124 MAY 2022
Figure 3 Existing Conditions

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR 13898 125 MAY 2022
6 References
ALUC (Airport Land Use Commission). 2003. “Santa Monica Airport Influence Area.” May 2003. Accessed December 2021. http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/project/aluc_airport-santa-monica.pdf.

Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2018. California State Scenic Highway System Map. Accessed December 2021. https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id= 465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa.

CARB (California Air Resources Board). 2005. Carbon Monoxide Resignation Request and Maintenance Plan.

Adopted February 2005. https://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/sccosip05/sccosip_redesig_mplan.pdf.

CARB. 2014. First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan Building on the Framework Pursuant to AB 32 – The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. May 2014. Accessed August 2014. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_climate_change_scoping_plan.pdf.

CARB. 2017. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. January 20. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/ 2030sp_pp_final.pdf.

CARB. 2020. “Maps of State and Federal Area Designations.” Available: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ resources/documents/maps-state-and-federal-area-designations.

CGS (California Geological Survey). 2015. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Beverly Hills Quadrangle.

Accessed January 2022. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/ index.html?map=regulatorymaps.

CGS. 2018. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning (AP) Map. Released January 11, 2018. http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHP/EZRIM/Maps/BEVERLY_HILLS_EZRIM.pdf.

City of Santa Monica. 1995. City of Santa Monica General Plan Safety Element. Adopted January 1995. Accessed December 2021. https://www.smgov.net/uploadedFiles/Departments/PCD/Plans/General-Plan/ Safety-Element/Adopted-Safety-Element-1995.pdf.

City of Santa Monica. 2010. City of Santa Monica Land Use and Circulation Element Final Environmental Impact Report. Adopted April 2010. Accessed December 2021. https://www.smgov.net/uploadedFiles/ Departments/PCD/Environmental-Reports/2010-Land-Use-and-Circulation-Element-Final-EnvironmentalImpact-Statement.pdf.

City of Santa Monica. 2016. 15X15 Climate Action Plan. https://www.smgov.net/uploadedFiles/Departments/OSE/ Climate/CSM_1515_CAP_FinalReport2016.pdf
City of Santa Monica. 2019. Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP). https://www.smgov.net/uploadedFiles/ Departments/OSE/Climate/CAAP_SantaMonica.PDF
City of Santa Monica. 2021. Santa Monica Municipal Code. Updated November 2021. Accessed January 2022. https://qcode.us/codes/santamonica/

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 126 MAY 2022
CNRA (California Natural Resources Agency). 2009. Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action:

Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB 97. December 2009.

DOC (California Department of Conservation). 2016a. California Important Farmland Finder. Accessed December 2021. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/.

DOC. 2016b. “Los Angeles County Williamson Act FY 2015/2016.” Accessed December 2021. http://ibecproject.com/PREDEIR_0000008.pdf.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2021. “EPA Region 9 Air Quality Maps and Geographic Information.” Available: https://www3.epa.gov/region9/air/maps/index.html#cal.

FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 2017. “Settlement Agreement/Consent Decree between the Federal Aviation Administration and the City of Santa Monica.” Signed January 2017. Accessed December 2021. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/faa-reaches-settlement-agreement-city-santa-monica?newsId=21394.

FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2020. “Flood Insurance Rate Map (06037C1589G).” Updated October 2020. Accessed December 2021. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery= 2411%20Delaware%20Avenue%2C%20Santa%20Monica%2C%20CA#searchresultsanchor.

FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2008. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), Software Version

1.1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, John A.

Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Environmental Measurement and Modeling Division.

December 8, 2008.

Geotechnologies Inc. 2016. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Proposed Santa Monica City Yard Master Plan, 2500 Michigan Avenue, Santa Monica, California. Prepared for Hathaway Dinwiddie. March 2, 2016.

KPFF (KPFF Consulting Engineers). 2018. Hydrology Report, Santa Monica City Yards. Prepared for City of Santa Monica, KPFF Job #115180, August 24, 2018.

Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning. 2015. “Significant Ecological Areas and Coastal Resource Areas Policy Map.” Adopted February 2015. Accessed January 2022. https://planning. lacounty.gov/assets/upl/project/gp_2035_2014-FIG_9-3_significant_ecological_areas.pdf.

SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments). 2020. Connect SoCal: The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments. September 3. Available: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/ 0903fconnectsocal-plan_0.pdf?1606001176.

SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District). 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. December 2016. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis.doc?sfvrsn=2.

SCAQMD. 2003. White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. August 2003. Accessed January 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Environmental-Justice/ cumulative-impacts-working-group/cumulative-impacts-white-paper.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 127 MAY 2022
SCAQMD. 2008a. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. June 2003; revised July 2008. Accessed September 2018. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/ localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst-methodology-document.pdf.

SCAQMD. 2008b. “Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold.” October 2008.

SCAQMD. 2017. Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. March 2017. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/final-2016-aqmp/ final2016aqmp.pdf.

USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2015. “Beverly Hills 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Topographic Map.” Accessed January 2022. https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/StagedProducts/Maps/USTopo/PDF/CA/ CA_Beverly_Hills_20150223_TM_geo.pdf.

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 128 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Date: 12/14/2021 - Last saved by: bdokkestul - Path: Z:\Projects\j1389801\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\Addendum\Figure1_RegionalLocation.mxd Oran
Los A
Moorpark
Simi
Valley
Thousand
Oaks
Palmdale
Acton
Glendale
La Canada
Flintridge
Pasadena
Altadena
Monrovia
Arcadia Duarte
Burbank
Temple
City
Santa
Clarita
Los
Angeles
Agoura
Hills Westlake
Village
Alhambra
Beverly
Hills Monterey
Park Industry East Los
Angeles Montebello
Santa
Monica
Hacienda
Heights
Culver
City Pico
Rivera
Vernon
Inglewood
Santa Fe
Springs
South
Gate
Hawthorne Norwalk El Segundo
Compton Gardena Bellflower
Manhattan
Beach
Long
Beach
Carson
Torrance
Lakewood
Palos
Verdes
Estates
Rancho
Palos
Verdes
Fullerton
Cypress
Los Alamitos Garden
Grove Seal
Beach Westminster
Fountain
Valley
Newport
Beach
P a c i f i c O c e a n
90 47
39 118
103
159
107
187
126
170
22 134
213
23 72
1 138
60 27
91 19
2 14
£¤101
§¨¦710
§¨¦10
§¨¦105
§¨¦5
§¨¦110 §¨¦605
§¨¦210
§¨¦405
Regional Location
City of Santa Monica City Yards Master Plan EIR Addendum SOURCE: ESRI 2017
0 42,000 21,000 Feet FIGURE 1
^
Project Site

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 130 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Date: 12/17/2021 - Last saved by: bdokkestul - Path: Z:\Projects\j1389801\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\Addendum\Figure2_LocalVicinity.mxd

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 266
Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 132 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Existing Conditions
City of Santa Monica City Yards Master Plan EIR Addendum FIGURE 3
Last edited by KCastaneda. Path: P:\300.Environmental\13898_Santa Monica City Yards Addendum\GIS and Graphics\GIS_Maps Curbside Recyclable Material CDIGreenwaste 13,333 SQ.FT Transfer Station MSW 4 1
10 11
12 16
15 2
3 5
6 7
9 13 14
14 15
17 8
SCD Property
0 490 245
N Feet

SITE NOTES
Current site. *Future fire training yard starting construction July 1, 2021 Customer ingressScaleScale houseLoad out portsCustomer egressRoll-off container for scrap metal or other waste streamsBack down rampHazmat lockerVehicle maneuvering areaE-wasteTiresApplianceElectrical serviceBollardsTrench drainStorm water treatment devicePorta potty 123
4 567
8 9
10 11
121314151617

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 268
Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 134 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 270
Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 136 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Date: 1/14/2022 - Last saved by: hmcomber - Path: Z:\Projects\j1389801\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\Noise\Figure5_NoiseMeasurementLocations.mxd

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY YARDS / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 13898 138 MAY 2022

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Appendix A
Air Quality Modeling Data

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Addendum, Hathaway Dinwiddie Change Santa Monica City Yards Addendum
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics - See 1.0, Project Characteristics.

Land Use - Project-specific information. General Light Industry surrogate for the project. Entire site will be paved.

Construction Phase - Project-specific schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Architectural Coating: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Building Construction - Fencing: Project-specific assumptions.

Off-road Equipment - Paving: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Site Preparation and Grading: Project-specific assumptions.

Trips and VMT - Modified default CalEEMod values.

On-road Fugitive Dust - Default CalEEMod values.

Demolition - No demolition.

Grading - Default CalEEMod equation for grading adjusted per grading equipment assumptions. 1,700 tons of Class II base material.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 1.00 1000sqft 0.00 1.00 0
Parking Lot 0.50 Acre 0.50 21,780.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
11 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2022
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Architectural Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking area coating.

Vehicle Trips - No mobile source emissions.

Vehicle Emission Factors - No mobile source emissions.

Road Dust - No mobile source emissions.

Woodstoves - Default CalEEMod values (no hearths).

Consumer Products - Default CalEEMod values.

Area Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking.

Landscape Equipment - No landscaping equipment.

Energy Use - No energy use.

Water And Wastewater - No water use.

Solid Waste - No solid waste.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Off-road Equipment: Tier 4 Interim for all equipment over 75 HP (PDF-AQ-1). Water Exposed Area: 2 times daily.

Operational Off-Road Equipment - Estimated outside of CalEEMod.

Fleet Mix - No mobile source emissions.

Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - No stationary sources.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 1.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 2.00 0.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 21.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 43.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 11.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 3.10 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 5.75 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 4.45 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 2.01 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 13.51 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 21.50 1.50
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,700.00
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 250 0
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,000.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.02 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 1.24 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 9.00 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.99 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.6370 9.5683 10.3888 0.0183 0.3514 0.3910 0.7424 0.0941 0.3633 0.4573 0.0000 1,737.452 8 1,737.452
8 0.4113 0.0565 1,755.396
9 Maximum 1.6370 9.5683 10.3888 0.0183 0.3514 0.3910 0.7424 0.0941 0.3633 0.4573 0.0000 1,737.452 8 1,737.452
8 0.4113 0.0565 1,755.396
9 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.3918 6.8442 11.2863 0.0183 0.3514 0.0677 0.4191 0.0941 0.0675 0.1615 0.0000 1,737.452 8 1,737.452
8 0.4113 0.0565 1,755.396
9 Maximum 1.3918 6.8442 11.2863 0.0183 0.3514 0.0677 0.4191 0.0941 0.0675 0.1615 0.0000 1,737.452 8 1,737.452
8 0.4113 0.0565 1,755.396
9 Mitigated Construction
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.96 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 231,250.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

14.98 28.47 -8.64 0.00 0.00 82.68 43.54 0.00 81.43 64.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.5000e004 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.5000e004 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation and Grading Grading 2/1/2022 3/31/2022 5 43 2 Building Construction - Fencing Building Construction 4/1/2022 4/30/2022 5 21 3 Paving Paving 4/1/2022 4/15/2022 5 11
4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/16/2022 4/22/2022 5 5 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation and Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation and Grading Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
Site Preparation and Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 0 6.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation and Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction - Fencing Cranes 0 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction - Fencing Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction - Fencing Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,307 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Water Exposed Area
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation and
Grading
3 8.00 4.00 168.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction -
Fencing
1 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 7 18.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0405 0.0000 0.0405 4.5300e0030.0000 4.5300e0030.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7460 8.6591 5.8200 0.0124 0.3568 0.3568 0.3283 0.3283 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Total 0.7460 8.6591 5.8200 0.0124 0.0405 0.3568 0.3973 4.5300e0030.3283 0.3328 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0178 0.6828 0.1557 2.4300e0030.0684 4.8900e0030.0733 0.0188 4.6700e0030.0234 266.0554 266.0554 0.0141 0.0422 278.9879 Vendor 7.7800e0030.2040 0.0695 7.8000e0040.0256 1.8700e0030.0275 7.3800e0031.7900e0039.1700e00384.2163 84.2163 2.8000e0030.0122 87.9061 Worker 0.0296 0.0223 0.2891 7.7000e0040.0894 5.7000e0040.0900 0.0237 5.3000e0040.0242 78.3043 78.3043 2.2800e0032.1400e00378.9987 Total 0.0552 0.9091 0.5143 3.9800e0030.1834 7.3300e0030.1908 0.0498 6.9900e0030.0568 428.5759 428.5759 0.0192 0.0565 445.8927 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0182 0.0000 0.0182 2.0400e0030.0000 2.0400e0030.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2368 4.2464 7.8417 0.0124 0.0202 0.0202 0.0202 0.0202 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Total 0.2368 4.2464 7.8417 0.0124 0.0182 0.0202 0.0384 2.0400e0030.0202 0.0222 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0178 0.6828 0.1557 2.4300e0030.0684 4.8900e0030.0733 0.0188 4.6700e0030.0234 266.0554 266.0554 0.0141 0.0422 278.9879 Vendor 7.7800e0030.2040 0.0695 7.8000e0040.0256 1.8700e0030.0275 7.3800e0031.7900e0039.1700e00384.2163 84.2163 2.8000e0030.0122 87.9061 Worker 0.0296 0.0223 0.2891 7.7000e0040.0894 5.7000e0040.0900 0.0237 5.3000e0040.0242 78.3043 78.3043 2.2800e0032.1400e00378.9987 Total 0.0552 0.9091 0.5143 3.9800e0030.1834 7.3300e0030.1908 0.0498 6.9900e0030.0568 428.5759 428.5759 0.0192 0.0565 445.8927 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.1647 1.6756 2.2379 3.1100e0030.0901 0.0901 0.0829 0.0829 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Total 0.1647 1.6756 2.2379 3.1100e0030.0901 0.0901 0.0829 0.0829 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.7800e0030.2040 0.0695 7.8000e0040.0256 1.8700e0030.0275 7.3800e0031.7900e0039.1700e00384.2163 84.2163 2.8000e0030.0122 87.9061 Worker 0.0370 0.0279 0.3614 9.7000e0040.1118 7.2000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.6000e0040.0303 97.8803 97.8803 2.8500e0032.6700e00398.7483 Total 0.0448 0.2319 0.4309 1.7500e0030.1374 2.5900e0030.1400 0.0370 2.4500e0030.0395 182.0966 182.0966 5.6500e0030.0148 186.6545 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0696 1.3546 2.3421 3.1100e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0030.0000 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Total 0.0696 1.3546 2.3421 3.1100e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0030.0000 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.7800e0030.2040 0.0695 7.8000e0040.0256 1.8700e0030.0275 7.3800e0031.7900e0039.1700e00384.2163 84.2163 2.8000e0030.0122 87.9061 Worker 0.0370 0.0279 0.3614 9.7000e0040.1118 7.2000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.6000e0040.0303 97.8803 97.8803 2.8500e0032.6700e00398.7483 Total 0.0448 0.2319 0.4309 1.7500e0030.1374 2.5900e0030.1400 0.0370 2.4500e0030.0395 182.0966 182.0966 5.6500e0030.0148 186.6545 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.1191 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7660 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.8900e0030.1020 0.0348 3.9000e0040.0128 9.4000e0040.0138 3.6900e0039.0000e0044.5800e00342.1081 42.1081 1.4000e0036.0700e00343.9531 Worker 0.0667 0.0502 0.6505 1.7400e0030.2012 1.2900e0030.2025 0.0534 1.1900e0030.0545 176.1846 176.1846 5.1300e0034.8100e003177.7470 Total 0.0706 0.1523 0.6852 2.1300e0030.2140 2.2300e0030.2162 0.0571 2.0900e0030.0591 218.2927 218.2927 6.5300e0030.0109 221.7001 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3394 5.1054 7.8281 0.0113 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.1191 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.4585 5.1054 7.8281 0.0113 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.8900e0030.1020 0.0348 3.9000e0040.0128 9.4000e0040.0138 3.6900e0039.0000e0044.5800e00342.1081 42.1081 1.4000e0036.0700e00343.9531 Worker 0.0667 0.0502 0.6505 1.7400e0030.2012 1.2900e0030.2025 0.0534 1.1900e0030.0545 176.1846 176.1846 5.1300e0034.8100e003177.7470 Total 0.0706 0.1523 0.6852 2.1300e0030.2140 2.2300e0030.2162 0.0571 2.0900e0030.0591 218.2927 218.2927 6.5300e0030.0109 221.7001 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.2116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.4161 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.8900e0030.1020 0.0348 3.9000e0040.0128 9.4000e0040.0138 3.6900e0039.0000e0044.5800e00342.1081 42.1081 1.4000e0036.0700e00343.9531 Worker 7.4100e0035.5800e0030.0723 1.9000e0040.0224 1.4000e0040.0225 5.9300e0031.3000e0046.0600e00319.5761 19.5761 5.7000e0045.3000e00419.7497 Total 0.0113 0.1076 0.1070 5.8000e0040.0352 1.0800e0030.0363 9.6200e0031.0300e0030.0106 61.6842 61.6842 1.9700e0036.6000e00363.7027 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.2116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0545 1.0598 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.2661 1.0598 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.8900e0030.1020 0.0348 3.9000e0040.0128 9.4000e0040.0138 3.6900e0039.0000e0044.5800e00342.1081 42.1081 1.4000e0036.0700e00343.9531 Worker 7.4100e0035.5800e0030.0723 1.9000e0040.0224 1.4000e0040.0225 5.9300e0031.3000e0046.0600e00319.5761 19.5761 5.7000e0045.3000e00419.7497 Total 0.0113 0.1076 0.1070 5.8000e0040.0352 1.0800e0030.0363 9.6200e0031.0300e0030.0106 61.6842 61.6842 1.9700e0036.6000e00363.7027 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Light Industry 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Parking Lot 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Unmitigated 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

1.6600e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.7300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.0000e0050.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Total 9.4000e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

1.6600e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.7300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.0000e0050.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Total 9.4000e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:15 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Santa Monica City Yards Addendum
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - See 1.0, Project Characteristics.

Land Use - Project-specific information. General Light Industry surrogate for the project. Entire site will be paved.

Construction Phase - Project-specific schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Architectural Coating: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Building Construction - Fencing: Project-specific assumptions.

Off-road Equipment - Paving: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Site Preparation and Grading: Project-specific assumptions.

Trips and VMT - Modified default CalEEMod values.

On-road Fugitive Dust - Default CalEEMod values.

Demolition - No demolition.

Grading - Default CalEEMod equation for grading adjusted per grading equipment assumptions. 1,700 tons of Class II base material.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 1.00 1000sqft 0.00 1.00 0
Parking Lot 0.50 Acre 0.50 21,780.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
11 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2022
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Architectural Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking area coating.

Vehicle Trips - No mobile source emissions.

Vehicle Emission Factors - No mobile source emissions.

Road Dust - No mobile source emissions.

Woodstoves - Default CalEEMod values (no hearths).

Consumer Products - Default CalEEMod values.

Area Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking.

Landscape Equipment - No landscaping equipment.

Energy Use - No energy use.

Water And Wastewater - No water use.

Solid Waste - No solid waste.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Off-road Equipment: Tier 4 Interim for all equipment over 75 HP (PDF-AQ-1). Water Exposed Area: 2 times daily.

Operational Off-Road Equipment - Estimated outside of CalEEMod.

Fleet Mix - No mobile source emissions.

Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - No stationary sources.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 1.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 2.00 0.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 21.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 43.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 11.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 3.10 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 5.75 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 4.45 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 2.01 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 13.51 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 21.50 1.50
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,700.00
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 250 0
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,000.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.02 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 1.24 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 9.00 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.99 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.6342 9.5314 10.4755 0.0184 0.3514 0.3910 0.7424 0.0941 0.3633 0.4573 0.0000 1,752.704 2 1,752.704
2 0.4113 0.0563 1,770.496
2 Maximum 1.6342 9.5314 10.4755 0.0184 0.3514 0.3910 0.7424 0.0941 0.3633 0.4573 0.0000 1,752.704 2 1,752.704
2 0.4113 0.0563 1,770.496
2 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.3890 6.8246 11.3730 0.0184 0.3514 0.0677 0.4191 0.0941 0.0674 0.1615 0.0000 1,752.704 2 1,752.704
2 0.4113 0.0563 1,770.496
2 Maximum 1.3890 6.8246 11.3730 0.0184 0.3514 0.0677 0.4191 0.0941 0.0674 0.1615 0.0000 1,752.704 2 1,752.704
2 0.4113 0.0563 1,770.496
2 Mitigated Construction
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.96 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 231,250.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

15.00 28.40 -8.57 0.00 0.00 82.68 43.55 0.00 81.43 64.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.5000e004 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.5000e004 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,307 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Water Exposed Area
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation and
Grading
3 8.00 4.00 168.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction -
Fencing
1 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 7 18.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0405 0.0000 0.0405 4.5300e0030.0000 4.5300e0030.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7460 8.6591 5.8200 0.0124 0.3568 0.3568 0.3283 0.3283 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Total 0.7460 8.6591 5.8200 0.0124 0.0405 0.3568 0.3973 4.5300e0030.3283 0.3328 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0182 0.6562 0.1530 2.4300e0030.0684 4.8700e0030.0733 0.0188 4.6600e0030.0234 265.9774 265.9774 0.0141 0.0422 278.9064 Vendor 7.8700e0030.1959 0.0672 7.8000e0040.0256 1.8700e0030.0275 7.3800e0031.7900e0039.1600e00384.1846 84.1846 2.8100e0030.0121 87.8701 Worker 0.0277 0.0202 0.3149 8.2000e0040.0894 5.7000e0040.0900 0.0237 5.3000e0040.0242 82.6754 82.6754 2.2500e0032.0000e00383.3282 Total 0.0538 0.8723 0.5350 4.0300e0030.1834 7.3100e0030.1907 0.0498 6.9800e0030.0568 432.8374 432.8374 0.0192 0.0563 450.1047 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0182 0.0000 0.0182 2.0400e0030.0000 2.0400e0030.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2368 4.2464 7.8417 0.0124 0.0202 0.0202 0.0202 0.0202 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Total 0.2368 4.2464 7.8417 0.0124 0.0182 0.0202 0.0384 2.0400e0030.0202 0.0222 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0182 0.6562 0.1530 2.4300e0030.0684 4.8700e0030.0733 0.0188 4.6600e0030.0234 265.9774 265.9774 0.0141 0.0422 278.9064 Vendor 7.8700e0030.1959 0.0672 7.8000e0040.0256 1.8700e0030.0275 7.3800e0031.7900e0039.1600e00384.1846 84.1846 2.8100e0030.0121 87.8701 Worker 0.0277 0.0202 0.3149 8.2000e0040.0894 5.7000e0040.0900 0.0237 5.3000e0040.0242 82.6754 82.6754 2.2500e0032.0000e00383.3282 Total 0.0538 0.8723 0.5350 4.0300e0030.1834 7.3100e0030.1907 0.0498 6.9800e0030.0568 432.8374 432.8374 0.0192 0.0563 450.1047 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.1647 1.6756 2.2379 3.1100e0030.0901 0.0901 0.0829 0.0829 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Total 0.1647 1.6756 2.2379 3.1100e0030.0901 0.0901 0.0829 0.0829 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.8700e0030.1959 0.0672 7.8000e0040.0256 1.8700e0030.0275 7.3800e0031.7900e0039.1600e00384.1846 84.1846 2.8100e0030.0121 87.8701 Worker 0.0346 0.0253 0.3936 1.0200e0030.1118 7.2000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.6000e0040.0303 103.3442 103.3442 2.8200e0032.5000e003104.1603 Total 0.0425 0.2212 0.4608 1.8000e0030.1374 2.5900e0030.1400 0.0370 2.4500e0030.0395 187.5288 187.5288 5.6300e0030.0146 192.0303 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0696 1.3546 2.3421 3.1100e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0030.0000 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Total 0.0696 1.3546 2.3421 3.1100e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0030.0000 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.8700e0030.1959 0.0672 7.8000e0040.0256 1.8700e0030.0275 7.3800e0031.7900e0039.1600e00384.1846 84.1846 2.8100e0030.0121 87.8701 Worker 0.0346 0.0253 0.3936 1.0200e0030.1118 7.2000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.6000e0040.0303 103.3442 103.3442 2.8200e0032.5000e003104.1603 Total 0.0425 0.2212 0.4608 1.8000e0030.1374 2.5900e0030.1400 0.0370 2.4500e0030.0395 187.5288 187.5288 5.6300e0030.0146 192.0303 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.1191 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7660 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.9400e0030.0980 0.0336 3.9000e0040.0128 9.3000e0040.0137 3.6900e0038.9000e0044.5800e00342.0923 42.0923 1.4100e0036.0700e00343.9350 Worker 0.0623 0.0455 0.7085 1.8400e0030.2012 1.2900e0030.2025 0.0534 1.1900e0030.0545 186.0196 186.0196 5.0700e0034.5000e003187.4885 Total 0.0662 0.1434 0.7420 2.2300e0030.2140 2.2200e0030.2162 0.0571 2.0800e0030.0591 228.1119 228.1119 6.4800e0030.0106 231.4235 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3394 5.1054 7.8281 0.0113 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.1191 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.4585 5.1054 7.8281 0.0113 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.9400e0030.0980 0.0336 3.9000e0040.0128 9.3000e0040.0137 3.6900e0038.9000e0044.5800e00342.0923 42.0923 1.4100e0036.0700e00343.9350 Worker 0.0623 0.0455 0.7085 1.8400e0030.2012 1.2900e0030.2025 0.0534 1.1900e0030.0545 186.0196 186.0196 5.0700e0034.5000e003187.4885 Total 0.0662 0.1434 0.7420 2.2300e0030.2140 2.2200e0030.2162 0.0571 2.0800e0030.0591 228.1119 228.1119 6.4800e0030.0106 231.4235 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.2116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.4161 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.9400e0030.0980 0.0336 3.9000e0040.0128 9.3000e0040.0137 3.6900e0038.9000e0044.5800e00342.0923 42.0923 1.4100e0036.0700e00343.9350 Worker 6.9200e0035.0500e0030.0787 2.0000e0040.0224 1.4000e0040.0225 5.9300e0031.3000e0046.0600e00320.6688 20.6688 5.6000e0045.0000e00420.8321 Total 0.0109 0.1030 0.1123 5.9000e0040.0352 1.0700e0030.0362 9.6200e0031.0200e0030.0106 62.7612 62.7612 1.9700e0036.5700e00364.7671 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.2116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0545 1.0598 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.2661 1.0598 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.9400e0030.0980 0.0336 3.9000e0040.0128 9.3000e0040.0137 3.6900e0038.9000e0044.5800e00342.0923 42.0923 1.4100e0036.0700e00343.9350 Worker 6.9200e0035.0500e0030.0787 2.0000e0040.0224 1.4000e0040.0225 5.9300e0031.3000e0046.0600e00320.6688 20.6688 5.6000e0045.0000e00420.8321 Total 0.0109 0.1030 0.1123 5.9000e0040.0352 1.0700e0030.0362 9.6200e0031.0200e0030.0106 62.7612 62.7612 1.9700e0036.5700e00364.7671 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Light Industry 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Parking Lot 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

1.6600e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.7300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.0000e0050.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Total 9.4000e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

1.6600e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.7300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.0000e0050.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Total 9.4000e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:16 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Santa Monica City Yards Addendum
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics - See 1.0, Project Characteristics.

Land Use - Project-specific information. General Light Industry surrogate for the project. Entire site will be paved.

Construction Phase - Project-specific schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Architectural Coating: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Building Construction - Fencing: Project-specific assumptions.

Off-road Equipment - Paving: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Site Preparation and Grading: Project-specific assumptions.

Trips and VMT - Modified default CalEEMod values.

On-road Fugitive Dust - Default CalEEMod values.

Demolition - No demolition.

Grading - Default CalEEMod equation for grading adjusted per grading equipment assumptions. 1,700 tons of Class II base material.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 1.00 1000sqft 0.00 1.00 0
Parking Lot 0.50 Acre 0.50 21,780.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
11 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2022
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Architectural Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking area coating.

Vehicle Trips - No mobile source emissions.

Vehicle Emission Factors - No mobile source emissions.

Road Dust - No mobile source emissions.

Woodstoves - Default CalEEMod values (no hearths).

Consumer Products - Default CalEEMod values.

Area Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking.

Landscape Equipment - No landscaping equipment.

Energy Use - No energy use.

Water And Wastewater - No water use.

Solid Waste - No solid waste.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Off-road Equipment: Tier 4 Interim for all equipment over 75 HP (PDF-AQ-1). Water Exposed Area: 2 times daily.

Operational Off-Road Equipment - Estimated outside of CalEEMod.

Fleet Mix - No mobile source emissions.

Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - No stationary sources.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 1.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 2.00 0.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 21.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 43.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 11.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 3.10 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 5.75 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 4.45 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 2.01 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 13.51 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 21.50 1.50
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,700.00
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 250 0
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,000.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.02 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 1.24 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 9.00 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.99 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0275 0.2632 0.2118 4.9000e0047.4000e0030.0107 0.0181 1.8700e0039.8400e0030.0117 0.0000 43.3874 43.3874 0.0105 1.3100e00344.0411 Maximum 0.0275 0.2632 0.2118 4.9000e0047.4000e0030.0107 0.0181 1.8700e0039.8400e0030.0117 0.0000 43.3874 43.3874 0.0105 1.3100e00344.0411 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0135 0.1596 0.2607 4.9000e0046.9200e0031.0100e0037.9300e0031.8100e0031.0000e0032.8200e0030.0000 43.3874 43.3874 0.0105 1.3100e00344.0411 Maximum 0.0135 0.1596 0.2607 4.9000e0046.9200e0031.0100e0037.9300e0031.8100e0031.0000e0032.8200e0030.0000 43.3874 43.3874 0.0105 1.3100e00344.0411 Mitigated Construction
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.96 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 231,250.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

50.98 39.36 -23.13 0.00 6.49 90.52 56.07 3.21 89.84 75.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-6-2022 4-5-2022 0.2346 0.1281
2 4-6-2022 7-5-2022 0.0508 0.0418
Highest 0.2346 0.1281

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.7100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3519 1.3519 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.3589 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.7100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3519 1.3519 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.3589 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/16/2022 4/22/2022 5 5 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation and Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation and Grading Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
Site Preparation and Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 0 6.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation and Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction - Fencing Cranes 0 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction - Fencing Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction - Fencing Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation and
Grading
3 8.00 4.00 168.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction -
Fencing
1 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 7 18.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,307 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Water Exposed Area
Architectural Coating 1 2.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.9000e0040.0149 3.3100e0035.0000e0051.4500e0031.0000e0041.5500e0034.0000e0041.0000e0045.0000e0040.0000 5.1884 5.1884 2.8000e0048.2000e0045.4406 Vendor 1.7000e0044.4200e0031.4700e0032.0000e0055.4000e0044.0000e0055.8000e0041.6000e0044.0000e0051.9000e0040.0000 1.6422 1.6422 5.0000e0052.4000e0041.7142 Worker 5.9000e0044.9000e0046.3800e0032.0000e0051.8800e0031.0000e0051.9000e0035.0000e0041.0000e0055.1000e0040.0000 1.5501 1.5501 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.5639 Total 1.1500e0030.0198 0.0112 9.0000e0053.8700e0031.5000e0044.0300e0031.0600e0031.5000e0041.2000e0030.0000 8.3808 8.3808 3.7000e0041.1000e0038.7187 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 3.9000e0040.0000 3.9000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.0900e0030.0913 0.1686 2.7000e0044.3000e0044.3000e0044.3000e0044.3000e0040.0000 23.3395 23.3395 7.5500e0030.0000 23.5282 Total 5.0900e0030.0913 0.1686 2.7000e0043.9000e0044.3000e0048.2000e0044.0000e0054.3000e0044.7000e0040.0000 23.3395 23.3395 7.5500e0030.0000 23.5282 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 1.7300e0030.0176 0.0235 3.0000e0059.5000e0049.5000e0048.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 2.8694 2.8694 9.3000e0040.0000 2.8926 Total 1.7300e0030.0176 0.0235 3.0000e0059.5000e0049.5000e0048.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 2.8694 2.8694 9.3000e0040.0000 2.8926 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.0000e0052.1600e0037.2000e0041.0000e0052.6000e0042.0000e0052.8000e0048.0000e0052.0000e0051.0000e0040.0000 0.8020 0.8020 3.0000e0051.2000e0040.8372 Worker 3.6000e0043.0000e0043.8900e0031.0000e0051.1500e0031.0000e0051.1600e0033.1000e0041.0000e0053.1000e0040.0000 0.9463 0.9463 3.0000e0053.0000e0050.9547 Total 4.4000e0042.4600e0034.6100e0032.0000e0051.4100e0033.0000e0051.4400e0033.9000e0043.0000e0054.1000e0040.0000 1.7483 1.7483 6.0000e0051.5000e0041.7919 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.3000e0040.0142 0.0246 3.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 2.8694 2.8694 9.3000e0040.0000 2.8926 Total 7.3000e0040.0142 0.0246 3.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 2.8694 2.8694 9.3000e0040.0000 2.8926 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.5600e0030.0326 0.0387 6.0000e0051.6300e0031.6300e0031.5200e0031.5200e0030.0000 5.1683 5.1683 1.5100e0030.0000 5.2059 Paving 6.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.2200e0030.0326 0.0387 6.0000e0051.6300e0031.6300e0031.5200e0031.5200e0030.0000 5.1683 5.1683 1.5100e0030.0000 5.2059 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0000e0055.7000e0041.9000e0040.0000 7.0000e0051.0000e0057.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0050.0000 0.2101 0.2101 1.0000e0053.0000e0050.2193 Worker 3.4000e0042.8000e0043.6700e0031.0000e0051.0800e0031.0000e0051.0900e0032.9000e0041.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 0.8922 0.8922 3.0000e0052.0000e0050.9001 Total 3.6000e0048.5000e0043.8600e0031.0000e0051.1500e0032.0000e0051.1600e0033.1000e0041.0000e0053.1000e0040.0000 1.1023 1.1023 4.0000e0055.0000e0051.1194 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 1.8700e0030.0281 0.0431 6.0000e0053.2000e0043.2000e0043.2000e0043.2000e0040.0000 5.1683 5.1683 1.5100e0030.0000 5.2059 Paving 6.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.5300e0030.0281 0.0431 6.0000e0053.2000e0043.2000e0043.2000e0043.2000e0040.0000 5.1683 5.1683 1.5100e0030.0000 5.2059 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e0052.6000e0049.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0050.0000 0.0955 0.0955 0.0000 1.0000e0050.0997 Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.9000e0040.0000 5.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0050.0000 0.0451 0.0451 0.0000 0.0000 0.0455 Total 3.0000e0052.7000e0042.8000e0040.0000 8.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0050.0000 0.1405 0.1405 0.0000 1.0000e0050.1451 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 3.0300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4000e0042.6500e0034.5800e0031.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e0050.0000 0.6394 Total 3.1700e0032.6500e0034.5800e0031.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e0050.0000 0.6394 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Light Industry 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Parking Lot 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3519 1.3519 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.3589 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3519 1.3519 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.3589 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 7623 1.3519 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.3589
Total 1.3519 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.3589
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 7623 1.3519 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.3589
Total 1.3519 1.1000e0041.0000e0051.3589
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.7100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 1.7100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

3.0000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.4100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.7100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

3.0000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.4100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.7100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Light
Industry
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 26 Date: 1/18/2022 11:17 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics - See 1.0, Project Characteristics.

Land Use - Project-specific information. General Light Industry surrogate for the project. Entire site will be paved.

Construction Phase - Project-specific schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Architectural Coating: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Building Construction - Fencing: Project-specific assumptions.

Off-road Equipment - Paving: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Site Preparation and Grading: Project-specific assumptions.

Trips and VMT - No offsite vehicles for LST analysis.

On-road Fugitive Dust - Default CalEEMod values.

Demolition - No demolition.

Grading - Default CalEEMod equation for grading adjusted per grading equipment assumptions. 1,700 tons of Class II base material.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 1.00 1000sqft 0.00 1.00 0
Parking Lot 0.50 Acre 0.50 21,780.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
11 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2022
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Architectural Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking area coating.

Vehicle Trips - No mobile source emissions.

Vehicle Emission Factors - No mobile source emissions.

Road Dust - No mobile source emissions.

Woodstoves - Default CalEEMod values (no hearths).

Consumer Products - Default CalEEMod values.

Area Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking.

Landscape Equipment - No landscaping equipment.

Energy Use - No energy use.

Water And Wastewater - No water use.

Solid Waste - No solid waste.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Off-road Equipment: Tier 4 Interim for all equipment over 75 HP (PDF-AQ-1). Water Exposed Area: 2 times daily.

Operational Off-Road Equipment - Estimated outside of CalEEMod.

Fleet Mix - No mobile source emissions.

Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - No stationary sources.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 1.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 2.00 0.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 3.10 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 5.75 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 4.45 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 2.01 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 13.51 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 1.00 1.50
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,700.00
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 250 0
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,000.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.02 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 1.24 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 168.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 4.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 9.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 2.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.99 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.96 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 231,250.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.4161 8.6591 7.0348 0.0124 0.8714 0.3568 1.2282 0.0974 0.3283 0.4257 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 0.0000 1,206.297
0 Maximum 1.4161 8.6591 7.0348 0.0124 0.8714 0.3568 1.2282 0.0974 0.3283 0.4257 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 0.0000 1,206.297
0 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.2661 7.7596 7.8281 0.0124 0.3921 0.1766 0.5687 0.0438 0.1632 0.2070 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 0.0000 1,206.297
0 Maximum 1.2661 7.7596 7.8281 0.0124 0.3921 0.1766 0.5687 0.0438 0.1632 0.2070 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 0.0000 1,206.297
0 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

10.60 10.39 -11.28 0.00 55.00 50.51 53.70 55.00 50.29 51.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.5000e004 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.5000e004 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation and Grading Grading 1/6/2022 1/7/2022 5 2 2 Building Construction - Fencing Building Construction 1/8/2022 5/27/2022 5 100 3 Paving Paving 5/28/2022 6/3/2022 5 5
4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/4/2022 6/10/2022 5 5 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation and Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation and Grading Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
Site Preparation and Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 0 6.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation and Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction - Fencing Cranes 0 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction - Fencing Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction - Fencing Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,307 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Water Exposed Area
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation and
Grading
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction -
Fencing
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.8714 0.0000 0.8714 0.0974 0.0000 0.0974 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7460 8.6591 5.8200 0.0124 0.3568 0.3568 0.3283 0.3283 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Total 0.7460 8.6591 5.8200 0.0124 0.8714 0.3568 1.2282 0.0974 0.3283 0.4257 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.3921 0.0000 0.3921 0.0438 0.0000 0.0438 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5436 7.7596 6.0476 0.0124 0.1766 0.1766 0.1632 0.1632 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Total 0.5436 7.7596 6.0476 0.0124 0.3921 0.1766 0.5687 0.0438 0.1632 0.2070 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.1647 1.6756 2.2379 3.1100e0030.0901 0.0901 0.0829 0.0829 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Total 0.1647 1.6756 2.2379 3.1100e0030.0901 0.0901 0.0829 0.0829 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0696 1.3546 2.3421 3.1100e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0030.0000 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Total 0.0696 1.3546 2.3421 3.1100e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0030.0000 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.2620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9089 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3394 5.1054 7.8281 0.0113 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.2620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6014 5.1054 7.8281 0.0113 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.2116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.4161 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.2116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0545 1.0598 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.2661 1.0598 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Light Industry 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Parking Lot 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Light
Industry
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

1.6600e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.7300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.0000e0050.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Total 9.4000e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

1.6600e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

7.7300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.0000e0050.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Total 9.4000e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:11 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - See 1.0, Project Characteristics.

Land Use - Project-specific information. General Light Industry surrogate for the project. Entire site will be paved.

Construction Phase - Project-specific schedule.

Off-road Equipment - Architectural Coating: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Building Construction - Fencing: Project-specific assumptions.

Off-road Equipment - Paving: Default CalEEMod values.

Off-road Equipment - Site Preparation and Grading: Project-specific assumptions.

Trips and VMT - No offsite vehicles for LST analysis.

On-road Fugitive Dust - Default CalEEMod values.

Demolition - No demolition.

Grading - Default CalEEMod equation for grading adjusted per grading equipment assumptions. 1,700 tons of Class II base material.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 1.00 1000sqft 0.00 1.00 0
Parking Lot 0.50 Acre 0.50 21,780.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
11 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2022
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR Architectural Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking area coating.

Vehicle Trips - No mobile source emissions.

Vehicle Emission Factors - No mobile source emissions.

Road Dust - No mobile source emissions.

Woodstoves - Default CalEEMod values (no hearths).

Consumer Products - Default CalEEMod values.

Area Coating - Default CalEEMod values for parking.

Landscape Equipment - No landscaping equipment.

Energy Use - No energy use.

Water And Wastewater - No water use.

Solid Waste - No solid waste.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Off-road Equipment: Tier 4 Interim for all equipment over 75 HP (PDF-AQ-1). Water Exposed Area: 2 times daily.

Operational Off-Road Equipment - Estimated outside of CalEEMod.

Fleet Mix - No mobile source emissions.

Stationary Sources - Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps - No stationary sources.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 1.00 0.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 2.00 0.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 1 0
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 2 0
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Interim
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 3.10 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 5.75 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24NG 4.45 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24E 2.01 0.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 13.51 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 1.00 1.50
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,700.00
tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 250 0
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,000.00 1.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.02 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 1.24 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 168.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 4.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 9.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 2.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.99 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.96 0.00
tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 231,250.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.4161 8.6591 7.0348 0.0124 0.8714 0.3568 1.2282 0.0974 0.3283 0.4257 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 0.0000 1,206.297
0 Maximum 1.4161 8.6591 7.0348 0.0124 0.8714 0.3568 1.2282 0.0974 0.3283 0.4257 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 0.0000 1,206.297
0 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 1.2661 7.7596 7.8281 0.0124 0.3921 0.1766 0.5687 0.0438 0.1632 0.2070 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 0.0000 1,206.297
0 Maximum 1.2661 7.7596 7.8281 0.0124 0.3921 0.1766 0.5687 0.0438 0.1632 0.2070 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 0.0000 1,206.297
0 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

10.60 10.39 -11.28 0.00 55.00 50.51 53.70 55.00 50.29 51.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.5000e004 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 3.5000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.4100e0030.0000 1.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3000e0043.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 3.5000e004 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation and Grading Grading 1/6/2022 1/7/2022 5 2 2 Building Construction - Fencing Building Construction 1/8/2022 5/27/2022 5 100 3 Paving Paving 5/28/2022 6/3/2022 5 5
4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/4/2022 6/10/2022 5 5 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation and Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation and Grading Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38
Site Preparation and Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 0 6.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation and Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction - Fencing Cranes 0 4.00 231 0.29
Building Construction - Fencing Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction - Fencing Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,307 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Water Exposed Area
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation and
Grading
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction -
Fencing
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.8714 0.0000 0.8714 0.0974 0.0000 0.0974 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7460 8.6591 5.8200 0.0124 0.3568 0.3568 0.3283 0.3283 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Total 0.7460 8.6591 5.8200 0.0124 0.8714 0.3568 1.2282 0.0974 0.3283 0.4257 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.2 Site Preparation and Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.3921 0.0000 0.3921 0.0438 0.0000 0.0438 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5436 7.7596 6.0476 0.0124 0.1766 0.1766 0.1632 0.1632 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Total 0.5436 7.7596 6.0476 0.0124 0.3921 0.1766 0.5687 0.0438 0.1632 0.2070 0.0000 1,196.621 7 1,196.621
7 0.3870 1,206.297
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.1647 1.6756 2.2379 3.1100e0030.0901 0.0901 0.0829 0.0829 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Total 0.1647 1.6756 2.2379 3.1100e0030.0901 0.0901 0.0829 0.0829 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.3 Building Construction - Fencing - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0696 1.3546 2.3421 3.1100e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0030.0000 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Total 0.0696 1.3546 2.3421 3.1100e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0035.0600e0030.0000 301.2390 301.2390 0.0974 303.6746 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.2620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9089 5.9174 7.0348 0.0113 0.2961 0.2961 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.4 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3394 5.1054 7.8281 0.0113 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Paving 0.2620 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6014 5.1054 7.8281 0.0113 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0579 0.0000 1,035.824 6 1,035.824
6 0.3017 1,043.367
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.2116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.4161 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e0030.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.2116 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0545 1.0598 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.2661 1.0598 1.8324 2.9700e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0033.9600e0030.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 22 Date: 1/18/2022 11:12 PM Santa Monica City Yards Addendum - LST Analysis - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.A.e
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: City Yards Master Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum (4935 : City Yards EIR

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Santa Monica City CouncilJune 14, 2022

Santa Monica City Council
June 14, 2022