Santa Monica City Council
September 30, 2025

Scope of Services
The following scope of work outlines all the necessary design services that will be provided by Dokken to deliver ready to advertise plans, specifications, and estimates for the Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement Project.

The Scope of Services also defines services by our expert and specialty subconsultants, four of which are Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) firms. Please refer to Exhibit 10-02, Consultant Contract DBE Commitment from Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual, for more information about our proposed DBE participation.

1. Project Management
As Project Manager, Tim Osterkamp will have the overall responsibility of directing the project team during the development and execution of the project as well as communication with City staff and documenting the progress and decisions made during the entire project. Tim will have the responsibility to deliver a quality project on time and within budget. This involves all aspects of project management including financial performance, schedule, and quality control.

Dokken’s Project Management includes regular in-person and virtual meetings, development and monitoring of action items, monthly progress reports, progress and budget monitoring, and coordination. Close contact will be maintained between the Project Manager, all sub-consultants, the City, project personnel, and regulatory agencies. Dokken will continuously inform the City of all project activities through completion of the project.

To assist with project management and delivery within a short timeframe we have created a management team which will oversee the different aspects of the project. Team coordination meetings will be held every two weeks to ensure the multitude of tasks are properly coordinated, problems and issues are brainstormed for solutions, and schedules are met or exceeded. The City will be invited to attend these meetings if they desire.

Kick-off Meeting: A Project “Kick-off” Meeting will be held following the Notice to Proceed. This meeting will include representatives from the City, Dokken, subconsultants and other involved agencies as needed. The primary meeting objectives will be to present the project, its goals, review available data relevant to the selected alternative, review the project scope and action item list, review the project schedule, identify key issues, and facilitate an exchange of ideas and expectations regarding the completion of the project.

Key Submittals: A coordination and status meeting will be held at City offices at key submittals as identified below. These meetings will be to review the submittal and project status and budget, to obtain City input, make decisions, and discuss issues that have the potential of affecting the project design, budget, or schedule. Dokken will provide updated Project Schedules as necessary. The schedules will be prepared in Microsoft Project and will identify the beginning dates, duration of each task, and end dates.

Project Development Meetings (PDT) will be held at a minimum monthly. These meetings are in addition to Team coordination meetings. Dokken will prepare all meeting notices, agendas, and minutes in consultation with City’s Project Manager.

Project Controls. Dokken will provide all contract management and quality control services throughout the duration of the project. Dokken will deliver a high-quality product within budget and on schedule. Dokken will prepare and update monthly a project schedule with tasks and milestones. Dokken will break down the schedule by logical tasks consistent with the scope of work and with enough detail to track project progress. The schedule will reflect realistic estimates of review periods by other agencies for tasks, such as reports, plans and coordination.

Dokken will have a Project Specific Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan in effect for the duration of the Scope of Services. The plan will identify key personnel and responsibilities, establish a process whereby all DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

deliverables are independently checked, corrected, and back checked prior to any formal submission and all job-related correspondence and memoranda are routed and received by affected persons and then appropriately filed. Dokken will review subconsultant environmental and engineering report submittals to ensure that appropriate background information, study methodology, interpretation of data, format and content are completed in accordance with current standards.

All work products submitted to the City’s Project Manager for review will be clearly marked as fully checked and prepared per the established project quality control procedures.

Administration/Invoices/Progress Reports. Upon contract approval, Dokken will immediately process subconsultant agreements so that their Tasks can begin as quickly as possible.

Dokken will prepare detailed monthly progress reports to record ongoing progress on the Project and to support invoices submitted to the City Fiscal Division, with copy to the Project Engineer/ Manager, for payment.

Reports will include an explanation of tasks accomplished for the month, deliverables finished/submitted, anticipated tasks/progress for the next month, pending issues and schedule completion target dates (updated Project schedule). Dokken will submit monthly invoices in a format that indicates: 1) the total contract amount, 2) all costs incurred for specific tasks performed for the period (actual and percentage), 3) costs incurred to date (actual and percentage), and 4) estimated percentage of completion for each task.

Task 1F "Design Coordination" shall be utilized on an as-needed basis as directed and authorized by the City.

Individual monthly invoices will include the following:
• Consultant project manager signature
• A unique invoice number
• Appropriate backup documentation attached
• A separate invoice for each subconsultant will be attached in the same format as the prime Consultant’s invoice and will be included in the Dokken invoice.

Deliverables to City:
i. Project specific QA/QC plan. QA/QC Plan to be provided to City within 30 days of Notice/Authorization to Proceed
ii. Monthly invoices and progress reports

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 35%, 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals Dokken will complete the Design, Special Provisions, and Engineer’s Estimate of the selected alternative in compliance with Local, State, and Federal requirements and Design Standards. The Plans and Specifications will be in Caltrans Format and modified by City standards. Special Provisions based on the current Caltrans Technical Specifications will be prepared as part of the Bid Documents. Preliminary plans will be submitted at the 35% phase. The PS&E package will be submitted for review and comment by the City at the 65%, 95%, and 100% phase. The PS&E package will be signed and stamped by a Registered Civil Engineer and/or Registered Structural Engineer at the 100% phase.

At every phase, all City comments will be recorded and written responses to the comments will be prepared and provided with each submittal. Dokken will review and address all City comments on the Draft PS&E and submit final plans, specifications and engineer’s estimate for review and approval by the City.

Constructability review will be performed at the 65% and 95% submittals. The review will be performed by Mr.

Dave Clerici and UNICO Engineering. Dave will focus on the structure elements and adjacent facilities and UNICO will perform constructability review on the project as a whole.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

UNICO will perform a review of the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) at the 65% and 95% stage. The review will consider access during construction, traffic control and phasing, utility relocations and impacts, work zone clearances during operations, impacts to the public, railroad involvement and agreements, environmental constraints and mitigations, geotechnical considerations, survey and staking information, line and grades, roadway geometry and details, existing conditions, transitions and conforms, and specialty construction items.

UNICO will prepare a matrix with the review comments, a memo including recommendations from their constructability review as well as any other pertinent information, and a set of redline plans.

UNICO will perform a systematic review of the PS&E to identify ambiguities, inconsistencies, and conflicts in the plans, specifications, bid item schedule and compliance with funding requirements. The review will identify areas and items of uncertainty and minimize unquantified risk to the bidder that could result in contract change orders. More specifically, the review will verify plan notes, conflicts between specifications and special provisions or references, quantity calculations, bid item descriptions and exclusions, measurement and payment clauses, quality control responsibilities, and versioning of standard plans and specifications.

Deliverables to City
i. AutoCAD files for each submittal (City requires CAD files to be submitted in AutoCAD; City retains the rights to CAD files)
ii. 2 full size (22x34) hard copies per submittal (intended for Caltrans submittals) iii. 4 half size (11x17) hard copies per submittal (intended for Caltrans submittals) iv. PDF copies for each submittal
v. 65%, 95%, and 100% design calculations
vi. 65%, 95%, and 100% quantity takeoff calculations and AutoCAD quantities (if AutoCAD is used for quantities) vii. 65%, 95%, and 100% cost estimate
viii. 65%, 95%, and 100% specifications
ix. Matrix with review comments and responses to all PS&E comments, at 95% and 100% submittals x. Matrix with review comments, recommendations, and a set of redline plans from constructability and biddability reviews, at 65% and 95% Submittals
B. Assemble Specifications
Project Specifications will be based on the Caltrans 2018 Standard Specifications and Standard Special Provisions. The design team will review the City specifications and revise the project specifications to avoid conflicts during bidding and construction.

At the 65% submittal, Dokken will prepare a full set of construction specifications for the project edited in Microsoft Word per Caltrans standard procedures for editing special provisions. The special provisions will encompass all aspects of the construction, including the implementation of the environmental measures and permit-related requirements. All necessary input from the subconsultants will be gathered to create the project specifications and special provisions.

Dokken’s environmental team will review the Environmental Commitment Record and prepare it for inclusion in the project’s bid package. This effort includes reviewing each environmental measure and determining which require special provisions for inclusion in the project’s specifications. By preparing special provisions for key environmental measures, the City will receive more accurate bids from prospective contractors, and this will help minimize the possibility of construction delay or change orders associated with environmental measures that the City has committed to. Given that the project has an expedited schedule, implementing the environmental measures into the special provisions will be key to meeting the project milestones.

The draft special provisions will be submitted with hidden text visible, and changes tracked to highlight the editing performed by the design team. This editing format will comply with Caltrans procedures for editing special provisions. The draft special provisions will also be submitted in contract version for easier review.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

Dokken will review the City comments on the draft specifications and meet with the City if necessary, to discuss any revisions. Dokken will ensure that the pay items described in the Project Specifications have been thoroughly checked against all call outs in the plans and that all items of work are fully described.

At the 95% submittal, Dokken will incorporate the comments from the 65% review and will update the special provisions.

At the 100% submittal, Dokken will finalize the special provisions and prepare a “bid book” for the County based on 2018 Standards. Dokken will review the City front end specifications and revise as needed to avoid conflicts.

The bid book will include the notice to bidders, bid forms, bid bond requirements and sample contract. The bid book will be Book 1 of 3, with the Special Provisions being Book 2 of 3, and Revised Standard Specifications being Book 3 of 3.

Deliverables to City
i. 65%, 95%, and 100% Specifications and Special Provisions ii. Project Specifications and Special Provisions will be incorporated into PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

C. Assemble Cost Estimate
Total project cost will be submitted at the 65%, 95% and 100% submittals. Cost data will be based on our experience with other recent similar sized projects, Caltrans Cost Data, and data from other projects in the area.

HBP non-participating items will be identified in the cost estimate. Contingencies will be updated based on the status of the plans.

Deliverables to City
i. 65%, 95%, and 100% Cost Estimate
ii. Project Cost Estimate will be incorporated into PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

D. Construction Working Day Schedule, Resident Engineer (RE) File Working Day Schedule: A detailed working day schedule will be prepared which includes all construction tasks. The schedule will be prepared at 35% submittal and updated throughout the project. The schedule will be a living tool so that sequencing will be readily apparent. The sequence shown on the plans will be back-checked for consistency with the working day schedule.

Resident Engineer File: The Resident Engineer (RE) file will be prepared at 100% submittal. The file will include 4-scale deck contours, joint movement calculations, quantity summary sheets, staking notes as needed, and notes to the RE as needed.

Deliverables to City
i. Working Day schedule
ii. RE Pending file
E. Surveying & Mapping
Horizontal and Vertical Control Surveys: Horizontal and vertical project controls utilized to prepare the topographic surveys during the bridge type selection will be verified and supplemental controls established, as needed, to complete the design topographic survey services.

Topographic Design Surveys: Conventional ground survey methods will be utilized to verify the topographic surveys already collected during the bridge type selection phase in and around Moomat Ahiko Way, Appian Way, Ocean Front Walk, and at the Pier Deck. Survey methods will also provide supplemental topographic data for the landside end of the pier at the intersection of Colorado Avenue and Ocean Avenue, the existing bridge structure, Palisades Beach Road for the new entrance, a portion of the parking lot and bike path for the DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

temporary ramp, the bike path under the pier, and a portion of Palisades Park at Ocean Avenue. In addition, up to 3 days of field survey time has been included to support locating utility paint marks, dipping manholes and other miscellaneous surveys. The topographic data will be downloaded, processed, and tied to the horizontal and vertical control established for this project. The final deliverables will include the topographic data plotted in CAD and an ASCII file of the topographic survey points.

Record Land Net Surveys and Mapping: The record land net mapping prepared during the bridge type selection phase will be reviewed and updated. Additional cadastral research will be performed, as needed, within the county of Los Angeles, city of Santa Monica, and other applicable entities for existing centerline and right-of-way files and/or available cadastral records in support of the centerline and right-of-way of Ocean Avenue, Colorado Avenue, the Santa Monica Pier, and other adjacent and intersecting rights-of-way within the project limits.

The land net map will include record centerlines, record right-of-way of the adjacent streets, and record lots and easements taken from the recorded tract and parcel map information, as well as underlying cadastral and title information and ownership information as recorded with the Los Angeles County assessor’s offices. Preliminary title reports will only be required to identify easements adjacent to or beneath the existing bridge structure, if necessary. For the purposes of this proposal, two preliminary title reports have been included, if required, title reports will be reviewed and easements and encumbrances plotted. The information contained in the title reports will be plotted and included on the land net mapping.

Deliverables to City
i. Supplemental Topographic Mapping in AutoCAD Civil3D formats ii. Record Land Net Mapping in AutoCAD Civil3D format
iii. Preliminary Title Report in PDF format
iv. Field Notes in PDF format
v. ASCII Point Files
F. Bridge Design and Detailing
Design Coordination and Bridge Type Selection
Building on the work completed in previous phases, Dokken will assist the City with obtaining Type Selection Approval by Caltrans. This will include modifications of the previously submitted bridge General Plans and Draft Type Selection Report, supporting exhibits as requested by the City and Caltrans, attending meetings with the City and Caltrans staff, updating construction cost estimates, and responding to Caltrans comments. The final General Plan and approach retaining wall plans will be submitted to the City as part of the 35% submittal.

Bridge Design
Dokken will perform the structures design work in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Eighth Edition) with California Amendments current at the time of bridge design, Caltrans Bridge Design Memos, Caltrans Bridge Design Details Manual, Caltrans Bridge Design Aids, Caltrans Bridge Memos to Designers, Caltrans Structure Technical Policies, and Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC).

Upon approval of roadway profile, roadway alignment and construction staging, Dokken will develop the design calculations and prepare plans for the new structure in accordance with Caltrans Manuals, incorporating recommendations from the Foundation Report, tsunami analysis and scour due to tsunami, and environmental documents. Design will consider all temporary, permanent, and transient loading conditions per the bridge design specifications and Caltrans Manuals. A full set of detailed bridge plans will be prepared with consideration for constructability and public safety. The detailed bridge plans will be quality checked against the 65% roadway, drainage, and utility plans, as well as hydraulic clearances, to ensure compatibility. Dokken will coordinate with the City to implement any aesthetics into the project plans, estimate, and special provisions.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

The existing bridge removal will require demolition drawings and specifications to protect the adjacent businesses, and pedestrian and vehicular traffic during construction. An Adjacent Structure Monitoring and Protection Plan will be prepared as part of Scope Section 2Q.

An independent bridge design check will be performed by Dokken. The bridge independent check engineer will use the 65%, unchecked detail plan set as a basis for independent structural calculations. A complete structural analysis will be independently performed with no communication with the designer allowed until this task is complete. A thorough review of the details is performed for clarity, capacity, City standards, Caltrans standards and constructability issues. When the independent check is complete, the checker and designer will compare their results and resolve any differences. The calculations will be corrected so that they agree substantially with each other. Agreement is then reached regarding corrections to the plans. After plan corrections, both the designer and checker will review the corrected details to ensure all concerns have been addressed.

After review comments are received from the 95% Bridge PS&E, Dokken will revise the plans and coordinate the necessary changes needed with the specifications and estimate. Written responses to the City comments will be prepared and provided with the 95% and 100% submittal. Four-scale drawings for setting bridge deck grades will be prepared.

Design of Temporary Pedestrian Bridge
The Temporary Pedestrian Bridge (TPB) foundation layout will be determined during the preliminary design phase of the structure. Burne Engineering will take into consideration all issues that would be affected; most significantly, clearances over the traffic lanes and walkways crossing under the TPB, live underground and overhead utilities, active aquarium entrance and facilities layout, construction economics of type, and eventual removal of the TPB. Based on the Bridge Type Selection Report, it was concurred that the TPB will be nearly 600 feet in length, with seven to nine spans.

To design the foundations, at first glance, two column bents comprised of drilled concrete piles with steel section columns embedded into the piles, will be investigated. It is anticipated the bents will be two-columns if the layout allows, and support steel or precast concrete caps at the tops of the columns. The caps will support the superstructure spans.

The superstructure is anticipated to be multiple spans of prefabricated trusses. However, during the 65% design phase for the Pier bridge, if it appears that there is more than one type of TPB structure that is feasible, a concise cost comparison of the viable structure types will be performed. For the prefabricated components, Burne Engineering will work with local manufacturers to develop the plans, cost estimates, and specifications.

At two foundation locations, the TPB will require a support within the footprint of the aquarium. Burne Engineering engineers will perform a detailed analysis of the impact on the existing aquarium building and TPB foundation interaction. Burne Engineering engineers will evaluate the existing pier deck capacity for the TPB design loading. Burne Engineering will compare the option of the existing deck (aquarium roof) as a temporary bridge support to the option of a new foundation that extends through the aquarium. Any additional supports for the pier and/or new foundations will be designed by Burne Engineering. All pertinent construction details will be included on the plans.

Burne Engineering will develop staging plans for the construction of the TPB and will coordinate with Dokken engineers to incorporate the details into the Staging Plans deliverables.

Design of Temporary Vehicular Bridge or Ramp
Burne Engineering will investigate two to three feasible structure type options for the Temporary Vehicular Bridge (TVB) from Parking Lot 1 North up to the Santa Monica Pier. The bridge will be designed to H20 minimum loading. Design considerations will include the unique features of the project, geotechnical parameters, construction costs, inconvenience to the public, and speed of construction in a concise preliminary design DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

analysis. This will help inform the choice of structure type to then complete the 65% design, and subsequent phases.

Burne Engineering will develop staging plans for the construction of the TPB and will coordinate with Dokken engineers to incorporate the details into the Staging Plan deliverables.

McClure Tunnel Analysis
The eastern edge of the project, consisting of retaining walls extend, extend over SR-1 and the McClure tunnel.

Analysis investigating project impacts on the tunnel may be requested by Caltrans. Mott Macdonald will perform studies and analysis which may be requested, with the full scope determined once input is received from Caltrans.

Quantity Calculations and Check Estimates
At the 65% submittal, detailed quantity estimates will be created and submitted for the project. Quantity calculations and independent quantity check calculations will be prepared per Caltrans Standards.

At the 95% submittal, the quantity and estimate comments will be addressed and an updated estimate will be submitted.

At the 100% submittal, quantities will be updated for all items that are changed between the 95% and 100% plans. The contingency will be reduced to 5% for the final estimate. Cost data will be based on our experience with other recent similar sized projects, Caltrans Cost Data, and data from other projects in the area.

Deliverables to City
i. TVB and TPB Concept Plan 35% Submittal
ii. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
iii. Quantity Design and Check Calculations
iv. Structural Design and Check Calculations
v. Special Provisions
vi. Construction Cost Estimate
vii. All bridge and demolition drawings, cost estimates, and special provisions will be incorporated into PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.
viii. Staging Plans will be incorporated into the Traffic Management and Staging Plans listed in Section 2.J.

G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier Dokken will coordinate with the City and any facility managers and operators to discuss impacts of the replacement curtain wall under the bridge. Dokken will first prepare design concept alternatives that will evaluate the size and layout of the wall as well as alternative aesthetic recommendations, material types, and foundation types. After receiving conceptual approval, Dokken will prepare full construction details, special provisions, design & check structural calculations, design and check quantity calculations, and a cost estimate for the curtain wall, including; the wall, foundations, attachments/impacts to existing facilities, openings, doors, and gates. The wall will be designed, sequenced, and staged in close coordination with design and construction of the bridge replacement and temporary pedestrian bridge. The design will be in conformance with all required building codes and specifications. EMI will support the design by providing foundation recommendations.

Deliverables to City
i. 35% Concept Plan Submittal
ii. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
iii. Quantity Design and Check Calculations
iv. Structural Design and Check Calculations
v. Special Provisions
vi. Construction Cost Estimate
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

vii. All Curtain Wall drawings, cost estimates, and special provisions will be incorporated into PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

H. Pier Sign
Prior to construction, field visits will be performed to obtain all the necessary information to design the raised sign. The information will include sign dimensions, location of damaged areas, and metal sampling for weldability testing. All locations of damaged areas in need of repair will be documented.

To construct the new roadway approaches, the sign will need to be removed, restored as determined by the field visits, and raised to a minimum clearance of 17 feet when reset. To protect the sign, ICF will prepare the Pier Sign Preservation Plan in accordance with CR-4 of the ECR. It will include information on the sign structure as well as restoration of its neon. ICF will work with Dokken to meet this requirement in accordance with the ECR. Caltrans District 7 Cultural Resources PQS will review this document before work is undertaken.

During the design phase of the raised sign, Dokken will determine if the sign can be simply raised by adding additional lattice members that match the existing look, or if the existing members require strengthening. The proposed pedestal and any strengthening proposed will be designed in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and Caltrans Manuals. Furthermore, the paint condition will be evaluated in order to determine the appropriate method of blasting, cleaning, and repainting.

The existing electrical service for the sign will be abandoned or, if more appropriate, will be relocated to the new location of the restored sign. Currently the electrical disconnect and meter are mounted on the sign. For the final design the electrical disconnect and meter will be placed remotely from the sign at a location where it is not readily accessible and visible to the public but will be accessible to maintenance personnel. Coordination with SCE for the electrical service point will be initiated early in design to allow for integration in other areas of the overall design.

Dokken will prepare full construction details, special provisions, design and check structural calculations, design and check quantity calculations, and a cost estimate for the Pier Sign.

Deliverables to City
i. Pier Sign Concept Plans at 35% Submittal
ii. PS&E submittal at 65%, 95% and 100% design
iii. Quantity Design and Check Calculations
iv. Structural Design and Check Calculations
v. Special Provisions
vi. Construction Cost Estimate
vii. Draft and Final Pier Sign Preservation Plan
viii. All Pier Sign drawings, cost estimate, and special provisions will be incorporated into PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

I. Roadway Design
Dokken will design the proposed bridge geometrics to not exceed the existing tangent grade of 10.12% longitudinally. The alignment will tie into the existing Colorado Avenue and Ocean Avenue intersection as well as the pier deck as previously described. Dokken will design the pedestrian facilities such as curb ramps, sidewalk, gutters, and crosswalks proposed for replacement using ADA standards. Curb ramp improvements include Moomat Ahiko Way, Seaside Terrace, Appian Way, and Ocean Ave.

The team will design and prepare plans for the signing and striping of the new bridge. This will require conforming the Ocean Avenue intersection as well as the pier deck. Plans will include parking lot temporary DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

pavement striping and marking plans to delineate the temporary entrance and access to parking. The plans will include appropriate signage to ensure traffic circulation and pedestrian awareness.

Signs and striping will be designed per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards.

Dokken will prepare Traffic Handling plans to demonstrate the limits of the contractor’s staging area in Lot 1 North. This will include temporary fencing, temporary pavement delineation, and temporary signage.

Dokken will incorporate the recommendations from the foundation report into the design of the retaining walls at the east abutment. The structural designer will work closely with the roadway designer to ensure the layout of the retaining walls avoid any conflict with existing and proposed project features. Structural calculations will follow AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Eighth Edition) with California Amendments and Caltrans Manuals.

The temporary driveway into Lot 1 North will ensure sidewalk modifications include curb ramp improvements to maintain an ADA path along the existing sidewalk along Appian Way.

Dokken will prepare plans for the restoration of Lot 1 North parking lot to ensure it is restored to preconstruction configuration. Plans will include striping, signage, construction details for the removal of the temporary driveway, and restoring the curb and sidewalk.

Dokken will account for the temporary relocation of the entry kiosk to a temporary location directed by the temporary driveway. This will prevent the kiosk from being damaged by the contractor if they were to remain at the current location. The plans will include placing the kiosks back to the preconstruction entrance location.

Dokken will prepare the signing and striping plans to restore the parking lot configuration to preconstruction circulation. This includes any pedestrian paths reconfigured by the contractor.

The design team will prepare plans and specifications instructing the contractor to reconstruct the parking lot damaged pavement and restriping the lanes, markings, and signs per preconstruction configuration. Dokken and MIG will prepare civil design under the bridge, east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk as well as well as conforms to Ocean Front Walk.

Feasibility and alternatives of placing bollards at the top of Colorado Ave, prior to the bridge will be investigated and recommendations will be made to the City. Considerations will include type and function, operations in a marine and sandy environment, and control. The City desires the ability to raise and lower the bollards remotely.

Upon City approval of a bollard type and system, Dokken will develop plans, specifications, and a construction cost estimate. If the bollards are placed within Caltrans right of way, Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans to obtain approval. The approval process will likely include providing mechanical, electrical and structure plans, structure calculations, and obtaining written approval for these plans. Impacts to the McClure Tunnel will be determined if requested by Caltrans.

Preliminary 35% plans will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to proceeding to 65% design.

The 35% plans will include Colorado Avenue horizontal and vertical layout, parking lot and reconstructed parking lot entrance concept plans, traffic handling, detour and ADA routes plans, and pedestrian and vehicle temporary bridge layouts. It is estimated that the plan sheets will include a Title Sheet, Typical Cross Sections, Layout/Profile sheet, General Plan and Foundation Plan.

Upon receipt of City comments, Dokken will address the comments and update the plan set in the 65% plan submittal.

Deliverables to City
i. Roadway plans at 35% Submittal
ii. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

iii. Special Provisions
iv. Quantity calculations and Cost Estimate
v. Roadway design, plans, cost estimate, and special provisions will be incorporated into the PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
Dokken will develop traffic management and staging plans for the proposed detours. Detours include pedestrian routes with ADA, vehicular, and bicycles. Signage and striping will be detailed for temporary routes.

Staging plans will list the order of construction necessary to ensure pedestrian routes are in place prior to the removal of ADA facilities. Restrictions will be included in the special provisions. Detours will include temporary striping and signing for Palisades Beach Road and Appian Way, Pier deck at the intersection with temporary vehicle ramp from Lot 1 North, Pacific Coast Highway and Palisades Beach Road exit, Appian Way and MAW East and West. Pedestrian and bicycle detour for Ocean Front Walk will be added in coordination with structural design of the temporary Pier deck temporary vehicle ramp from Lot 1 North.

Deliverables to City
i. Traffic Management and Staging Plans at 35% Submittal ii. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
iii. Special Provisions
iv. Quantity calculations and Cost Estimate
v. Traffic Management and Staging plans, cost estimate, and special provisions will be incorporated into the PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs General Site Drainage Analysis
Dokken will review the existing drainage patterns and facilities within the project limits. We are aware of the City’s stormwater and water quality treatment facilities within the project limits and will obtain as-built information on those facilities as well as confirm their locations as part of the analysis. Proposed drainage features will be designed to collect runoff and convey it to the adjacent existing facilities.

Existing and proposed drainage patterns and analysis of facilities will be documented in a project Drainage Report (draft and final).

Drainage Design for Bridge
Deck drains will be designed to collect and convey drainage from the bridge deck and connect to the existing drainage infrastructure. The analysis will be documented in the project Drainage Report.

Stormwater BMP Design
Stormwater quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be required to treat stormwater from the project.

The preferred strategy will be to tie into the existing onsite treatment system. The BMP design will be documented in the project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP).

Water Quality Management Plan
The project WQMP will document the project’s stormwater management strategy. This task will also be used for coordinating stormwater and drainage with the California Coastal Commission. A draft and final WQMP will be prepared for the project and show that project BMPs meet the City’s MS4 permit requirements.

Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP)
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

A preliminary SWPPP will be prepared for the project according to the requirements of the Stormwater Construction General Permit for the purposes of estimating construction stormwater BMP costs and providing a basis for the construction contractor to follow. The construction contractor will be required to review and adopt the preliminary SWPPP or compile their own for the construction phase of the project.

Deliverables to City
i. Draft and Final Drainage Report
ii. Draft and Final WQMP
iii. Drainage Plans at 35% Submittal
iv. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
v. Special Provisions
vi. Quantity calculations and Cost Estimate
vii. Drainage plans, cost estimate, and special provisions will be incorporated into the PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

L. Geotechnical Recommendations
Earth Mechanics, Inc. (EMI) will provide the geotechnical engineering design services for the following design elements:

1. Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement with associated eastern abutment and retaining walls.

2. New pedestrian bridge parallel to the Pier Bridge.

3. Temporary access ramp.

4. Multiple at-grade structure improvements (curtain walls, trash compactor, guard shack, pier sign).

5. Structural pavement sections including recommendations for repaving portions of Appian Way, Palisades Beach Road, and Lot 1 North.

6. Evaluation of proposed improvements on the McClure Tunnel.

Details of the proposed geotechnical services for the project are presented below.

Geotechnical Investigation
Per Caltrans/AASHTO recommendations, a soil boring is required at every support of new bridge structures, every 100 to 200 feet for new retaining walls and approximately every 500 ft for new pavement sections. EMI’s geotechnical field investigations plan is presented in Table 2. The boreholes will be excavated using a truckmounted or track-mounted drilling rig. The proposed approximate boring depths will be raised if refusal is encountered. The target depth of borings is 20 ft below the tip of proposed structure foundations. Asphalt concrete cold-patch will be used to replace asphalt that is removed by excavations, and quick-set cement will be used to replace concrete that is removed by excavations.

There are existing CPT soundings and geotechnical borings that EMI performed in 1997; however, none of the borings were advanced to the necessary depth to meet the current Caltrans requirements (primarily depth).

Due to access for drill rigs in the area, borings may not be able to be advanced within 15 ft of the proposed foundations; therefore, a design exception may be required by Caltrans.

Table 2: Proposed Soil Boring Information
Design Element Number of Borings Target Depth (feet)
Pier Bridge & Pedestrian Bridge 7 125
Retaining Walls / Pier Sign 1 40
Temporary Ramp 1 60
Earthwork / Pavement 5 10 / Bulk Sample
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

Environmental clearance for the field investigation is anticipated to require coordination with multiple resource agencies (i.e., Coastal Commission). Preparation of the permitting documents with the environmental agencies will need to be obtained by the environmental consultants contracted with Dokken or the City of Santa Monica.

EMI will assist the environmental consultant in the preparation of the permit applications by providing a work plan and boring location plan for the geotechnical investigation. Archaeological, cultural, and biological reviews or studies, if required, will be performed by other consultants contracted by Dokken or the City. A field investigation schedule will be prepared by EMI to assist in the coordination of any necessary environmental monitoring during the geotechnical investigation.

EMI field personnel will collect soil samples for laboratory testing, including bulk samples of near-surface soils and small disturbed and relatively undisturbed ring samples of deeper soils. The small, disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples will be collected using split-spoon samplers at a vertical interval of about 5 feet, alternating between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and the Modified California Drive (MCD) sampler. Samples of subsurface soils will be logged during the field investigation, secured in their containers or collected in plastic bags, and transported to the EMI laboratory.

Geotechnical Engineering Analyses
Results obtained from the field investigation and laboratory testing will be used to characterize subsurface soils and conditions and create idealized soil profiles for design purposes. The following analyses will be performed for the project:
• Evaluation of seismicity and estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration based on the Caltrans design criteria, and recommendation of ARS curve for bridge structural design. • Foundation analysis for bridges, pier widening, retaining walls, signs, and at-grade structures. • Assessment of global slope stability (including trenches, excavations, and shoring). • Evaluation of soil corrosivity conditions and recommendations for mitigation measures. • Design of pavement structural section in accordance with the Caltrans method or City of Santa Monica standard drawings.

Report Preparation
EMI will prepare up to three (3) geotechnical reports according to Caltrans guidelines; (1) one FR for the Pier Bridge, (2) one FR for the Pedestrian Bridge, and (3) one Geotechnical Design Report that will contain foundation recommendations for all the non-bridge structures as well as earthwork and pavement recommendations.

Evaluation of the impacts on the McClure Tunnel will be included in the FR for the Pier Bridge. EMI will address any comments resulting from Caltrans and City of Santa Monica review and prepare final reports.

Deliverables to City
i. Draft and Final Pier Bridge Foundation Report
ii. Draft and Final Temporary Pedestrian Bridge Foundation Report iii. Draft and Final Geotechnical Design Report
M. Landscape Design
MIG will prepare the plans, technical special provisions, quantities, and cost estimate for the landscape reconstruction in Palisades Park and along slopes next to the bridge and entrance to Lot 1 North. Additionally, MIG will design and prepare the plans for development of the community plaza space underneath the reconstructed bridge; this will include hardscape (flatwork, seating, furniture), planting, and irrigation design.

During 65% design, MIG will attend a project kick-off meeting with the City and Dokken in order to review the vision for the project, the landscape scope of work, establish lines of communication, and review the project schedule. MIG will perform site visits as required to review the existing site conditions and become familiar with the design factors including but not limited to site orientation, sun angles, potential view angles, site grade elevations, drainage patterns, utility locations, and existing vegetation. Individual files will be created for DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

landscape construction, hardscape, irrigation, and planting to facilitate coordination with consultant team.

Particular attention will be given to refining the design of public spaces, site perimeter, hardscape materials (pedestrian and vehicular pavements), drainage concept, irrigation, planting, light fixtures, and site furnishings.

The deliverables will include a draft and final PS&E package, Material samples (i.e., hardscape samples, paint chips, etc.), and material cut sheets (i.e., site furniture, irrigation equipment, plant material, etc.) will be submitted to the City for review and approval.

At 95% design, MIG will finalize the tree disposition plan. MIG will review and respond to all the comments from the 65% submittal and assemble a draft and final 95% PS&E package.

Based on the comments received, MIG will update the design and assemble Final 100% PS&E Package (Bid Set) for the landscape scope of work.

Dokken’s in-house ISA-Certified arborist Scott Salembier (WE-12418A) will complete an arborist survey and report of all trees within the project footprint. As part of the arborist survey, the arborist will map each tree with GPS, identify the species, measure stem diameter, install a tree tag, and evaluate each tree for evident signs of health decline or structural hazards. An Arborist Report will then be prepared to document tree resources within the project footprint, determine potential project effects to trees, and recommend specific trees to be removed or protected in place. The Arborist Report will also include an evaluation of potential indirect effects to a nearby heritage tree and general compliance with the City’s Urban Forest Master Plan.

Deliverables to City
i. Landscape Plans at 35% Submittal
ii. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
iii. Special Provisions
iv. Quantity calculations and Cost Estimate
v. Draft and Final Arborist Report
vi. Landscape plans, cost estimate, and special
provisions will be incorporated into the PS&E
deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

N. Utility Coordination & Design
Dokken will coordinate with utility companies and the City's utility departments impacted by the project. It is understood that most utility owners' response times vary; therefore, the Dokken team will be diligent in coordinating with the utility owners and make sure design decisions and relocations will adhere to the City's accelerated construction schedule. In addition, the Dokken team will facilitate coordination between the Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing (MEP), and Fire Protection (FP) consultants and the utility owners. To keep communication precise, Dokken will document and keep a record of all communication through a utility tracking matrix.

Upon receiving the Notice-to-Proceed, Dokken will immediately prepare and present "A-Letters" to Utility Owners requesting most current and update utility as-builts. Once the as-builts and mapping have been received, they will be transferred into Dokken's Utility CAD Basefile and be used to determine if there will be any conflicts with the proposed improvements.

Dokken will also prepare and present "B-Letters" and request relocation plans. While coordinating relocation designs with utility companies, Dokken will maintain and update the utility CAD basefile. Once relocation plans are complete, the Dokken team will prepare and present Notice to Owners ("C-Letters") to specify relocation expectation dates either before or during construction.

The Dokken team will coordinate the relocation designs for water and sewer lines with the City of Santa Monica and prepare PS&E. It is assumed one water service line will require relocation near Ocean Front Walk and one sewer main pipe will require relocation near Appian Way. P2S will design the capping of the service connections to existing bathrooms.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

Terrestrial LiDAR and conventional ground survey methods will be utilized to capture the existing utilities located underneath the existing bridge and pier, where accessible by personnel. This will require the ability for personnel to walk underneath and enter the area by foot. Efforts will be made to capture visible utilities within the area underneath the existing bridge and pier, but if utilities are not visible or are obstructed, they may not be included in the survey. The limits of lidar mapping under the pier will extend from the western end of the aquarium facilities to the limit of pier widening to the west (distance of approximately 210 feet), and include a distance approximately 40 feet wide, measured from the northern end of the pier.

The LiDAR data will be downloaded, processed, and tied to the horizontal and vertical control established for this project. The final deliverables will include the utility data plotted in CAD. Dokken will prepare Building Information Modeling (BIM) design using Civil3D Pipe Networks for proposed utilities and existing utilities at risk of conflict, to verify all conflicts are identified and resolved. Data to be used for BIM preparation includes survey measurements to exposed pipelines, measurements to 7 potholes, and as-built mappings.

In addition, utility pothole survey support will be provided. For the purposes of this proposal 7 utility potholes have been included. The utility pothole surveys will be performed in one mobilization once the pothole investigation has been completed.

Special Provisions, Quantities, and Cost Estimates will be prepared for utility relocations that will be paid for with project funds, including utility facilities owned by the City and any Utility Companies with prior rights.

Lastly, the Dokken team will submit Report of Investigations (ROI) for all Utility Owners.

Deliverables to City
i. Utility tracking Matrix
ii. Utility CAD Basefile
iii. 35% Concept Plan Submittal
iv. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
v. Special Provisions
vi. Quantity Calculations and Cost Estimate
vii. Utility plans, cost estimate, and special
provisions will be incorporated into the PS&E
deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) P2S will be the primary designer for the MEP and FP modification and improvements to the pier project. The fire sprinkler standpipe serving the area under the pier will be relocated as necessary for the other improvements.

Water service for the fire system will be coordinated with the civil and utility work in the area.

The SCE vault beneath the pier will be relocated to a more adequate location. Temporary high voltage and low voltage (below 480V) will also be provided for distribution to the various facilities needing electrical service.

Where possible, service runs and raceways will be consolidated for a cleaner look.

Above grade utilities presently located under the bridge and connecting to the pier facilities will be relocated and reconnected, including sewer, water, gas and electrical services. P2S will coordinate fiber optic/telephone and gas utilities to be designed by the corresponding providers. P2S will also design MEP and FP for the aquarium offices at the reconstruction of the common wall. Final scope of the work will be confirmed based on additional record as-builts and site investigation of the area. It is expected that the existing generator will be relocated prior to the start of the bridge and pier project.

P2S will work closely with the City to coordinate any relocations for the utilities impacted by the project. Special provisions specifying work not covered by the standard specifications will be provided as necessary for the MEP and FP work. Engineer’s estimate for the work will be provided along with the quantity of materials expected to be needed for the work.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

Deliverables to City
i. 35% Concept Plan Submittal
ii. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
iii. Special Provisions
iv. Quantity Calculations and Cost Estimate
v. MEP and FP plans, cost estimate, and special
provisions will be incorporated into the PS&E
deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

P. Pier Widening & Modification
To support the temporary pedestrian and vehicle bridges on the existing pier, the framing and foundation of the existing pier and incorporated building must be fully understood and documented by any available as-built plans or field inspection. Dokken and Burne Engineering will review all available as-builts and visit the site to perform a structural inspection to confirm or document the configuration and condition of the framing and foundation, including existing interior partition walls. This may involve removal of portions of the finish materials to access and observe all portions of the structure within the potential area of work especially the pier deck, railing, and walls common to the existing pier deck as they will be supporting the temporary structures.

Following the documentation of the as-built condition, Dokken will first prepare design concepts that will evaluate alternatives to not only widen the pier to align with the replacement bridge edge of deck, but also strengthen/rehabilitate/temporarily support the existing pier at the location of support of the temporary structure touchdown points, the Hippodrome, and aquarium roof. Design concepts will include the size, layout, temporary structure touch down points, construction access, demolition, and material types used for the pier widening and modifications. The details of the joints and connections between existing, new and temporary structures will include any seismic, thermal or live load deflections, and loads to ensure flashing/waterproofing details, pedestrian access/safety are maintained during and after construction and capable of accommodating movements and loads as necessary. After receiving conceptual approval, Dokken and Burne Engineering will prepare full construction details, special provisions, design & check structural calculations, design and check quantity calculations, and a cost estimate for the Pier Widening, strengthening, rehabilitation and temporary supports, including common walls, replacement of the aquarium roof, foundations, and attachments/impacts to existing facilities. These modifications will be designed, sequenced, and staged in close coordination with design and construction of the bridge replacement and temporary bridges. Design will be in conformance with all required building codes and specifications and AASHTO LRFD and Caltrans codes and guidance documents.

Deliverables to City
i. Pier Widening Concept Plan 35% Submittal
ii. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
iii. Quantity Design and Check Calculations
iv. Structural Design and Check Calculations
v. Special Provisions
vi. Construction Cost Estimate
vii. All pier widening and modification plans, cost
estimate, and special provisions will be
incorporated into the PS&E deliverables listed
in Section 2.A.

Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
ICF will administer this scope of work, including the scheduling of resources; handling e-mail and telephone communications; responding to requests for information; briefing the internal project team on project status; preparing invoices and tracking budget; and other general project administration tasks. All work will be performed by a National Environmental Protect Act (NEPA) Certified Professional/Architect that meets EIR/EA qualifications.

ICF will attend no more than ten (10), one-hour virtual meetings with Dokken to discuss plans, documents, and deliverables and ICF will attend no more than five (5), one-hour virtual meetings with the City of Santa Monica Landmarks Commission. The budget for this task includes preparation for the meetings, and assumes that two ICF team members will participate in each meeting.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

ICF will review three sets of plans: 65%, 95%, and 100%, as both AutoCAD files and electronic PDFs. For each set of plans, ICF will review the plans and provide feedback given in the form of a short memo to Dokken to ensure that the plans comply with completed environmental documents. ICF will prepare two memos per plan set for a total of six memos. The first memo for each plant set will provide issues that should be resolved, if any are present, and the second will update the record to note how issues were addressed and/or resolved. Meetings, as listed under the Task 7 below, will accompany this work as needed.

ICF will not be responsible for the Landscape Reconstruction Plan, but ICF will review the plan to determine that the proposed replacement landscape elements are appropriate for the reconstruction of Palisades Park, which National Register of Historic Places eligible and is a designated City of Santa Monica landmark. ICF will provide a memo with its comments regarding this plan.

ICF will complete a walkthrough when construction meets 50% complete, as well as 100% complete, as required per the Environmental Commitments Record. When the construction meets 50% complete, ICF will prepare and submit a document that records the status of the project’s various elements. The document will note what has been completed and what needs to be completed, in addition to any special notes. The document will take the form of a cover memo accompanied by a table.

When construction meets 100% complete, ICF will also prepare and submit a document that records the status of the project’s various elements. The document will confirm that all required construction components have been completed, in addition to any special notes and digital photographs of the restored Pier Sign. The document will take the form of a cover memo accompanied by a table.

ICF will prepare an Adjacent Structure Monitoring Plan in accordance with CR-3 of the Environmental Commitment Record (ECR). Mr. Heller, ICF’s historic architect, and team of historic preservation specialists will work with Dokken to meet this requirement. The Monitoring Plan will define appropriate and reversible protective measures as well as performance standards, as identified in the proposed mitigation measures. As part of the development of the Adjacent Structure Monitoring Plan and prior to demolition of the existing bridge, ICF’s team will photograph the historic properties to record their existing pre-construction conditions, existing settings conditions, and identify character-defining features of Looff’s Hippodrome and 1601-1619 Ocean Front Walk. As packaged and in accordance with the ECR, Caltrans District 7 Cultural Resources PQS will review this document before work is undertaken.

Deliverables to City
i. Two memos per percent-complete plans, for a total of six (6) electronic memos. Each memo will undergo internal QA/QC and editing. The first memo will be a record for Dokken to guide their engineers with any suggested design changes. The second memo for each set of plans will memorialize how issues were addressed and resolved and will also be a document of record. ICF will not prepare or address comments from Dokken; but each memo will be a completed document upon submittal. ii. Adjacent Structure Monitoring Plan, which will include a draft plan, response to three rounds of comments (Dokken, City, and Caltrans), and one final with:
a. Digital set of photographs of Looff’s Hippodrome and 1601-1619 Ocean Front Walk property and accompanying photo log.
b. One document (format to be determined) per historic property identifying character-defining features c. The task does not include the development of a shoring plan if it is determined that historic properties maybe be adversely affected by construction.
iii. Memo to File Landscape Design Plan review.
iv. ICF will submit the 50% memo and 100% memo draft and final form, and ICF will respond to one round of comments from Dokken and one round of comments from the City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
Miscellaneous facility design will include temporary and permanent relocation of the trash compactor, relocation of stairs under the bridge, possible reconstruction of retaining wall adjacent to the bridge, removal of existing debris under the bridge, and removal of temporary office under the bridge.

Dokken, with support from P2S, will prepare concept plans for relocating the trash compactor and relocating the stairs. The plans will be included in the 35% submittal for review and approval by the City. After receiving conceptual approval, Dokken and P2S will prepare full construction details, special provisions, design & check structural calculations, design and check quantity calculations and a cost estimate for the trash compactor temporary and permanent relocations and stair relocation. These will be designed, sequenced, and staged in close coordination with design and construction of the bridge replacement and temporary bridges. Design will be in conformance with all required building codes and specifications and AASHTO LRFD and Caltrans codes and guidance documents.

The project specifications will also include removal of debris from under the bridge. v. Trash Compactor and Stairs Concept Plan 35% Submittal vi. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
vii. Quantity Design and Check Calculations
viii. Structural Design and Check Calculations
ix. Special Provisions
x. Construction Cost Estimate
xi. All plans, cost estimate, and special provisions will be incorporated into the PS&E deliverables listed in Section

2.A.

S. Lighting & Electrical Design
Dokken will work with the city to choose appropriate light fixtures and light poles that are true to the historical themes of the bridge, pier deck, and pier edge. LED lighting with warm tones will be utilized both to avoid harsh white lighting and to replicate the lighting from earlier eras of the pier. Poles having an antique or historical appearance related to the themes of the pier will be used along with pole heights and sizes that proportional to the area and space being lit. and that provide appropriate levels of lighting. Historical photos of the bridge approach and to the pier deck and pier edge will be consulted. Lighting analysis will be completed, and renderings provided to ensure that the design is acceptable before being constructed.

Existing lighting electrical service points and service disconnects along with electrical meters will be investigated from field visits and consulting as-built plans of the pier and bridge approach. Dokken will coordinate with SCE for any new electrical service points including any existing service points that need to be upgraded.

The pier sign will be removed and replaced near the existing locating along Colorado Avenue. The existing electrical service point and meter presently located on the pier sign will be abandoned and a new service will be coordinated with SCE. The new electrical service will be located at a more appropriate location, remote from the sign but with access to maintenance personnel. Dokken will coordinate with P2S who is doing the sign restoration plan and confirm the exact electrical requirements of the sign and the new electrical service.

Special provisions for the lighting and electrical design of the lighting will be developed, using appropriate language from the City’s Standard Specifications, Caltrans Standard Specifications and Special Provisions, and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction as appropriate. Special language and details will be developed where standard language does not cover the uniqueness of the project’s lighting and electrical needs.

Quantities will be developed and submitted at the 65%, 95% and final submittal packages. Estimates based on the electrical quantities will be provided and updated as the project is finalized. Dokken will use various DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

resourced and their experience to provide the City with relevant and accurate quantities and engineer’s estimated for this portion of the work.

Deliverables to City
i. 35% Concept Plan Submittal
ii. PS&E submittals at 65%, 95% and 100% design
iii. Special Provisions
iv. Quantity Calculations and Cost Estimate
v. All Lighting and Electrical Design plans, cost estimate, and special provisions will be incorporated into the PS&E deliverables listed in Section 2.A.

T. Hazardous Waste
Geocon will perform soil sampling and analysis of aerially deposited lead (ADL) within the project limits and an asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead containing paint (LCP) survey of the Santa Monica Pier Bridge and attached aquarium building. The information obtained from the ADL investigation will be used to evaluate soil disposal costs and identify health and safety concerns. The information obtained from the ACM/LCP survey will be used for waste profiling, coordinating asbestos removal activities, and estimating associated costs. Other environmental document services will be negotiated in an as-needed basis.

Pre-Field Activities
A Health and Safety Plan (HSP) will be prepared for the proposed field activities. The HSP will provide guidelines on the use of personal protective equipment and the health and safety procedures to be implemented during the project as specified in T8 CCR §1529, T8 CCR §3203, T8 CCR §3204, T8 CCR §§5095-5100, T8 CCR §5144, and T8 CCR §5192. Underground Service Alert will be contacted to delineate public utilities and easements within the site prior to performing excavation operations.

Field Activities – ADL Investigation
Geocon will advance up to 10 hand-auger borings within the project limits. The borings will be located within areas of exposed soil in the vicinity of the bridge.

Soil borings will be advanced to a maximum depth of approximately 4.0 feet using hand augers. Soil samples will be collected at the following depth intervals: 0 to 0.5 foot, 1.0 to 1.5 foot, 2.5 to 3.0 feet, and 3.5 to 4.0 feet. A total of up to 40 soil samples will be collected at selected depth intervals. Completed soil borings will be backfilled to surface with the soil cuttings.

Boring locations will be surveyed using Global Positioning System (GPS) surveying equipment.

Laboratory Analyses
Samples will be analyzed for the following constituents:
• Up to 40 samples will be analyzed for total lead using EPA Test Method 6010. • Soil samples with total lead concentrations exceeding 50 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (i.e., ten times the STLC) will be further analyzed for soluble lead using the Waste Extraction Test (WET). For budgeting purposes, we have assumed that 40 samples will require additional analysis by the WET method. • Up to 10 samples with total lead concentrations greater than 100 mg/kg or WET lead concentrations greater than 5.0 milligrams per liter (mg/l) will be further analyzed for soluble lead using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) method.

The samples will be analyzed on a 10-day turnaround time following submittal to the laboratory.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

Bridge ACM and LCP Survey
An ACM survey will be conducted on the bridge structure and the attached building currently occupied by an aquarium. Samples for asbestos analyses will be collected in a manner that minimizes damage to the structures but that is consistent with the goal of representative sampling of each homogeneous area.

Samples collected for asbestos analysis will consist of bulk samples of each type (homogenous area) of potentially asbestos-containing material from the bridge. Sample locations will be indicated on diagrams presented with the final reports. The bulk samples will be collected by a Geocon Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act (AHERA)-trained and Cal/OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC). Photographs of each structure in general and of the sample locations in particular will be taken and included in the final reports.

Samples will be transported to a certified environmental laboratory using chain-of-custody documentation.

When the asbestos content is visually estimated to be less than 10% in a material, the Client may elect to (1) assume the amount is greater than 1% and treat the material as asbestos-containing, or (2) request verification of the amount by PLM point counting. If the results obtained by point counting and visual estimation are different, the point count result must be used. When no asbestos is detected by PLM, point counting is not required.

The scope assumes that up to 88 samples of suspect ACM will be collected during the bridge survey for analysis by PLM and that ten ACM samples will be further analyzed by point counting.

Bulk paint samples of deteriorated potential LCP will be collected using techniques presented in United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines. In addition, each painted area sampled will be evaluated for evidence of deterioration such as flaking or cracking.

Paint samples will be submitted for lead analyses in accordance with EPA Test Method 6010B under chain-ofcustody protocol on a 10-day turnaround time.

Paint samples that exhibit a total lead concentration greater than 50 milligrams per kilogram (i.e., greater than ten times the soluble threshold limit concentration) will be analyzed via the WET. Those paint samples that exhibit a soluble (WET) lead concentration greater than 5.0 mg/l will be analyzed for soluble lead by the TCLP test.

The scope assumes that up to 12 samples of suspect LCP will be collected during the survey for analysis for total lead, that six samples will be further analyzed for WET soluble lead, and that six samples will be analyzed for TCLP soluble lead.

Report Preparation
Draft versions of the reports will be prepared to transmit the field observations, laboratory data, data evaluation and statistics, and conclusions for both the ADL survey and the ACM/LCP Survey. The reports will include diagrams of sample locations and laboratory results presented in tabular format. A professional geologist (PG) will review/sign the ADL Survey report. Draft report will be transmitted to the Client via e-mail in electronic format (.pdf file). Final reports will be submitted after the Client provides written draft report review comments.

Deliverables to City
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling Analysis Plan
ii. Draft and Final ADL Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare submittal for Caltrans encroachment permit (see H14 for as-builts of the Pier Bridge and the Caltrans-owned McClure Tunnel and Attachment H03- Draft BTSR page 29) Dokken will obtain 2 Caltrans District 7 Encroachment Permits for the project. The first application will be for preliminary engineering activities in the State right of way including site review, topographic surveying, potholing, and geotechnical exploration. This encroachment permit will cover Dokken and the sub-consultants performing the work as well. The second permit will be for construction of the project and will include coordinating Caltrans approval of the project plans (for work in the State right of way). This permit will be included as an attachment to the special provisions for the project so the Contractor will be aware of the permit requirements.

On each permit review cycle from Caltrans, Dokken will respond to comments on the permit application and revise/resubmit the application, reports and plans as necessary to obtain the Caltrans Encroachment Permits for engineering and construction. The preliminary engineering permit is usually only 1 or 2 submittals, whereas the construction permit typically takes 2 or 3 submittals.

B. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission Permit
Commission Coordination
Kick-off Meeting and Information Review
Dudek’s coastal planners will review project information, including the opportunity to initiate correspondence between the Commission and the City, while also using relevant documents provided by the City such as past permits. Dudek coastal planners will then participate in the kick-off meeting with City staff from the Public Works Department, Development Services Department, and/or City Manager’s Office to review existing conditions and discuss project approach and features of the bridge design requirements.

Commission Coordination
As described in the Project Understanding section, Dokken and Dudek will coordinate with City personnel and Commission staff to confirm the relevant Coastal Development Permit (CDP) jurisdiction and determine the appropriate permitting procedures. Dudek coastal planners will then evaluate the project’s consistency with applicable CCA/LUP policies to identify potential issues, including those described above. Based on this evaluation, Dudek coastal planners will prepare for and attend meetings with City and Commission staff to discuss the proposed design, including the wave and sea level rise adaptation analysis, alternatives analysis, impact determinations, and any mitigation. One of these meetings may be a site visit with the Commission staff engineer. To efficiently engage Commission staff, these discussions could also occur as part of any regularly scheduled coordination meetings between the City and the Commission. As appropriate, and based on Commission staff feedback, Dudek coastal planners will assist the City and project team to incorporate project modifications demonstrating the project’s consistency with coastal resource protection policies. This coordination prior to preparation and submittal of the formal CDP application package will ensure a more complete application and minimize the additional requests from Commission staff during the CDP application review process.

Assumptions:
• The kick-off meeting will include up to two (2) Dudek and one (1) Dokken staff attending • Kick-off will use a virtual platform (MS Teams, Zoom, or other system) • Commission coordination includes the site visit plus 3 additional meetings with up to two (2) Dudek staff attending.

Commission CDP
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

Dudek will coordinate with Dokken, the City and Commission staff throughout the CDP process. Dudek will assemble the CDP application package, including completing the Commission CDP application form, compiling all required attachments, and preparing a submittal letter that summarizes environmental information, coastal hazards analysis, and relevant technical studies conducted by others to demonstrate compliance with applicable policies.

Following the Commission staff’s first 30-day review of the application submittal, Dudek coastal planners will review any requests for additional project information and provide recommendations to deem the application complete and prepare for the decision-maker hearing. Because the project is located in a highly utilized shoreline site with extensive public access facilities, this scope assumes three 30-day Commission incomplete letter/review cycles to thoroughly address potential impacts to coastal resources. Dokken will provide oversight during preparation of the application.

After the CDP application is formally filed, Dudek will coordinate with CCC staff during development of the staff recommendation. Prior to the public Commission hearing on the CDP application, Dudek will review the final Commission staff report/recommendation and discuss the findings with the City. As needed, Dudek will support the City in preparing a presentation to address the staff recommendation and any specific special conditions. In addition, Dudek will attend the Commission hearing and be available to answer questions that come up during the hearing.

Assuming that Commission approves the CDP, and the City is supportive of the approved conditions and release of the permit, Dudek will help the City compile all of the materials needed to satisfy the special conditions of the permit. Dudek will coordinate with Commission staff, as necessary, to oversee issuance of the permit.

In summary, Dudek’s CDP support services include the following:
• Preparation of a CDP application package
• Preparation of two responses to CCC incomplete letters • Review of Commission staff report, including conditions of approval and findings • Preparation for and attendance of Commission hearing to support City’s presentation, if necessary • Compilation of condition compliance materials
Given the level of uncertainty that exists in projects that involve the Commission staff and commissioners, including unanticipated data needs and technical study following review of application materials, along with the level of support required at the public hearing, additional work authorization may be required and would be subject to separate scope and fees.

Assumptions:
• Commission coordination during Task 1.2 and the CDP process will be managed via email, conference calls, and other means of electronic communications;
• One (1) potential coordination team meeting (virtual platform) with Commission staff and the City is included to account for the potential need for concurrence on the staff report and corresponding conditions of approval.

Coastal Hazards Analysis
The Pier Bridge Replacement project is located at the base of Santa Monica Pier and fronted by a wide sandy beach which is stabilized by a submerged breakwater offshore. The site is well protected from present day coastal hazards associated with seasonal and event-based erosion and wave runup. However, more extreme events, such as a tsunami, in combination with Sea Level Rise (SLR) could result in flooding that extends to the project area.

The purpose of this site-specific coastal hazard analysis is to evaluate how existing and future coastal hazards may interact with the proposed project features. The approach has been developed to address the Tsunami DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

Analysis (RFP Addendum 1) and support the Coastal Development Permit application, providing an analysis consistent with the California Coastal Commission’s Sea Level Rise Policy Guidance (CCC, 2018).

Dokken’s sub consultant, GHD, will perform all Coastal Hazards Analysis tasks. GHD will participate in a kickoff/coordination meeting with the design team to gain an understanding of the overall project and confirm the methods and approach applied in the coastal hazards analysis align with the design criteria and local and state SLR guidance documents.

Sea Level Rise
Our approach is founded upon an understanding of coastal processes and hazards, sea level rise science and policy guidance published by the Ocean Protection Council (OPC) and California Coastal Commission (CCC).

These documents provide a framework for evaluating potential impacts from coastal hazards associated with sea level rise and identifying adaptation strategies to mitigate these impacts. For budgeting purposes, we assume that four (4) SLR scenarios will be evaluated, representative of the Project’s design life and risk tolerance.

Coastal erosion and Flooding:

Coastal hazards such as shoreline erosion and flooding will be evaluated for each of the SLR scenarios to identify tipping points, or impact thresholds, that may be relevant to design of the project elements. The assessment of these hazards will rely on previously published data on coastal hazards from the Coastal Storm Modeling System (USGS) and other relevant hazard assessments performed in the project vicinity.

Coastal hazard data will be compiled on an ArcGIS platform to develop maps that depict both hazards and project sites features. A vulnerability assessment of proposed project elements will be performed to identify potential future vulnerabilities to be considered in the design process.

Tsunami Analysis:

The analysis will include a desktop assessment of tsunami hazards based on data provided in the ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase, which provides results of a probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis for a Maximum Considered Tsunami (MCT) event which has a 2,475-year return period. The online geodatabase provides sitespecific offshore tsunami amplitudes, inundation depth for tsunami overwash areas, and runup values at the landward limit of inundation.

ASCE 7-16 provides two options for evaluating depth and velocity of tsunami hazards within the MCT design zone. The energy grade line analysis (EGLA) method uses the runup elevation at the inundation limit to develop a profile of maximum flow depth and velocity between that point and the coastline. The second method of analysis involves the use of a site-specific numerical model to simulate the propagation of the tsunami waveform across the project site. The budget for this assessment assumes the EGLA method will be sufficient to provide an initial assessment of tsunami hazards at the Project site. Numerical modeling of tsunami hazards is not included in the scope and budget of this assessment.

Parking Study:

Typical of the CDP process the CCC is likely to require both a broad analysis of parking in the Coastal zone within reasonable proximity to the Pier, as well as non-private vehicle access, including transit service serving the area, access via the active transportation network (for bicycles and pedestrians), and micro-mobility, such as the City’s program to allow scooter service in the City.

The Pier Bridge construction will temporarily disconnect the parking spaces on the Pier’s deck from access at Ocean Avenue as well as temporarily remove from service some parking spaces in Lot 3, also known as the 1550 Parking Lot (Lot 3). The new entrance to the Pier may also eliminate parking spaces. Walker will account for the parking supply providing access to the Pier, including current parking supply, anticipated parking supply during construction and staging, and upon completion of the new Pier bridge. This supply is anticipated to include the Pier Deck, 1550 Lot, and other accessible, publicly accessible parking of a material number of spaces serving the DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

associated Coastal area, based on Walker’s experience with similar studies and input from the City and project team. This task also anticipates Walker’s parking designers providing guidance with parking space layouts to enhance efficiencies, traffic flow, and minimize loss of parking spaces and inconvenience.

Parking demand conditions before, during, and after construction will be analyzed. To perform the analysis, Walker will:
• Request and receive electronic data from the City’s parking system for various parking conditions (peak, shoulder, and some low season) to perform its analysis. • Review relevant historic data from previous studies.
• Engage in sample field data collection in some parking facilities to calibrate and monitor for current parking conditions.

Walker will review future conditions and projections for beach and Pier access including projected visitor data as available, and review relevant event data and frequency, as determined appropriate.

Walker will evaluate multimodal parking alternatives for the pier as part of a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) analysis. They will work with the Dokken Team and City staff to identify parking alternatives that currently provide access to the Pier area and will do so in the future. These may include transit services, bicycle and pedestrian access, and micro-mobility in the area.

Based on its data and analysis, Walker will determine whether new parking and mobility strategies and actions may be necessary to ensure access to the Pier throughout construction.

Walker will be available for up to three public presentations which may include CCC, City Planning Commission, and City Council.

The traffic study findings and recommendations will be presented in a draft Parking Study Report. Dokken will review and address all City comments on the draft report and submit a Final Parking Study Report.

Deliverables to the City:
i. PowerPoint presentation of preliminary Coastal Hazards Analysis results ii. Draft and Final Hazard Analysis Technical Reports
iii. Draft and Final Traffic Study Report
iv. California Coastal Development Permit
Assumptions:
• Assume 1 in-person meeting (or site visit) and up to 3 virtual meetings with the Project team are conducted to discuss objectives, assumptions, and review results of the study. • Publicly available data sources will be referenced for topography and bathymetry within the Project site, unless other data can be provided by the client.
• Publicly available data sources will be referenced for coastal hazards and tsunami analyses. Site-specific numerical modeling is not included in this analysis.
• Draft and final technical reports assume a single round of review comments from the Project team. • GHD will assist the project team in responding to initial review comments from CCC, but have not included budget to perform any additional analysis, or subsequent coordination with CCC or other agencies as part of the permit process.

C. Prepare submittal for State Lands Commission
Dokken will prepare an application to the State Lands Commission (SLC) to update the State Land Lease and Permit at the project site. The State Land Lease and Permit update application must include the following:
introductory letter, justification, existing permit, exhibit showing new lease limits, vicinity map, photos, DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

Feasibility Report for Public Access, completed environmental studies, preliminary project plans, and the approved CEQA document.

Prior to submitting the application package, Dokken will meet with the SLC in Sacramento to describe the project, scope, status, and timeline to familiarize the SLC staff with the project. We have completed 4 of these lease updates in the last 5 years and have one in progress with them currently. Dokken will address comments from the SLC in writing and arrange for a virtual resolution meeting to discuss any comments that cannot be easily resolved.

D. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & Recreation The area adjacent to Palisades Park will be used for construction staging of the bridge. The park use will not be impacted, and access to the rest of the park would not be restricted by staging in this area. Dokken will prepare all required permitting to be submitted to the Department of Parks and Recreation. Prior to submitting the application package, Dokken will meet with State Parks to describe the project, scope, status, and timeline to familiarize the State Parks staff with the project. We have coordinated with State Park continually on various projects over the past 12 years and currently are coordinating with them. Dokken will address comments from the State Parks in writing and arrange for a virtual resolution meeting to discuss any comments that cannot be easily resolved.

E. Support for other permits and approvals as needed (OPTIONAL) Dokken will assist the City in the coordination and preparation of other permits and approvals required throughout the project duration. While we have not included budget for additional permits or approvals at this time, we recommend establishing a budget for an optional task should any unforeseen permitting or approval needs arise. We do employ the in-house and subconsultant permitting expertise to address any additional approval needs the City may have.

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation
With a large HBP program of projects at Dokken, we work to stay informed on all the latest HBP requirements, policies, and procedures. Dokken will assist the City in meeting the HBP documentation requirements for annual surveys, right of way & utility RFA, utility package approvals, any 6D’s to update scope and schedule, right of way certification, PS&E certification, DBE estimating, and construction RFA’s. Dokken can provide the data required for these and other local assistance forms or load the required information directly into the forms for the City. For the final project estimate for the PS&E certification we can draw from many other City and County projects and the Caltrans database to provide the City accurate pricing in the final estimate. We will also break up the progress and final estimates by participating and non-participating HBP items.

5. Public Outreach
Arellano Associates (AA) will develop outreach services for the design and construction phases of the project. AA understands the importance that all stakeholders, including local businesses, residents, and potential visitors are provided with meaningful engagement opportunities as this project nears final design and prepares for construction.

A. Public Outreach Plan
AA will collaborate with the project team and the City of Santa Monica on the development and implementation of a Public Outreach Plan (POP) that meets the goals of the project. Because this area has a high tourist/visitor DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

use, AA will include innovative outreach tactics to continuously update businesses, residents, motorists, tourist, and other stakeholders leading up to construction. As restrictions and recommendations improve concerning COVID-19, AA will continue implementing digital tools but will also include options for in-person engagement, depending on the needs of the project, which provide ample opportunities to connect directly with the project team to share ongoing thoughts and challenges during the project. The POP will also focus on targeted communities and locations, including businesses and transit operators. AA understands the need for translation to Spanish and will ensure all public documents are translated as needed. The plan will be a blueprint for outreach management and implementation and will remain flexible to address the current environment.

Deliverables to City
i. Public Outreach Plan (English and Spanish)
B. Stakeholder Database
AA will update and manage the existing contact list from the previous phases of work as the official Project database. Contacts will include elected officials and staff, city/county/school district representatives, emergency responders, residents, businesses, transportation and transit agencies, commuters, recreational travelers, news media, and other stakeholders identified by the project team. The database will be maintained in Microsoft Excel and shared with the project team upon request. Updates to the database will be made after each meeting, presentation, and written correspondence. Parcel data will be obtained for property owners and tenants in the area, as needed.

Deliverables to City
i. Stakeholder Database
C. Collateral Material (presentation quality renderings, digital and print) AA will develop clean and concise collateral materials in hard copy and digital formats, including project and city logos and photographs, as needed. Collateral will be produced in both English and Spanish.

A fact sheet and FAQ will provide a project overview, information about the Project’s benefits, schedule, funding, and contact information. Publication of the fact sheet and FAQ will follow review and approval by the Project Team.

Additional items AA will develop, as needed, are presentations including project renderings provided by the design team, E-blast notification templates, social media graphics, and project information banners.

Meeting materials will include sign in sheets, agendas, speaker cards, and other handouts, as needed.

Deliverables to City
i. Collateral materials in hard copy and digital formats (English and Spanish) D. Photography/Videography
AA will provide professional quality photography for collateral material, website updates, community meetings, monthly status reports, and special events. Photos will be dated and archived for documentation. All photography files will be turned over to the prime contractor at the end of the contract term.

AA will provide drone video and or timelapse footage of the project. AA also has the capability to deliver high quality project information and/or project update videos.

Deliverables to City
i. Project photos and videos
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

E. Website/Social Media
AA will develop a project webpage or prepare digital content for use on the existing Project page on the City of Santa Monica’s website. Information will be consistent with the Project fact sheet and updated, as needed, based on prior review and approval by the Project team.

AA will develop comprehensive monthly social media campaigns including graphics, post copy, and parameters for the City to implement on their Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram channels.

Deliverables to City
ii. Project website
iii. Social media campaigns
F. Community Meetings/Outreach Events
AA will provide support to City of Santa Monica for coordination with one community meetings/events during the design phase. No outreach meeting will be held during construction. The meetings will be in-person and will provide information to the public regarding the project including project milestones, potential construction impacts, safety tips, and other important information. Support activities will include coordination of dates, booking the venue (and insurance), equipment rental, logistics tasks, meeting notification, set-up/clean-up, bilingual (Spanish/English) staffing, presentation, and printed materials (flyers, meeting boards, etc.). The notification plan may include extended outreach to businesses, residents, schools, chambers of commerce, community-based organizations, and neighborhood councils, as needed.

Meeting attendees will be added to the stakeholder database for future communication.

In addition to meetings, AA may coordinate up to 6 on-site kiosks or tabling at existing local events to share project information, flyers, and other information. These kiosks can be stationary, or staff can walk the project area disseminating information. AA will ensure that bilingual (Spanish/English) staff are available.

G. Attend Meetings/Presentations (assume a minimum of four board/commission meetings; task includes preparation of presentation)
In coordination with the project team, AA will develop a project presentation to be used for board and commission meetings. AA will also attend and present, as needed, at four (4) board or commission meetings to ensure the stakeholders are aware of the project and have the latest information available.

H. Wayfinding
AA will develop wayfinding to assist visitors navigating the site during construction. It will be updated as paths and roads are closed and opened during construction. The Wayfinding will be available via the website and by posting QR codes along pedestrian routes during construction.

I. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies
AA will assist with preparation and planning of a groundbreaking and ribbon cutting ceremonies. AA assistance may include event organization and planning, advertisement, organizing refreshments and providing public address systems. If desired, AA can also solicit local businesses and organizations for event sponsorship.

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend Meetings
Dokken will attend the Pre-Bid Meeting and answer questions on the plans and technical provisions.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

B. Respond to Bidder Inquiries
During the bidding phase, Dokken will provide responses to bidder questions and inquiries on the plans and specifications.

Deliverables to City
i. Answers to bidder inquiries
C. Prepare bid addenda
The plans and specifications will be revised if needed and Addenda will be prepared to address bidder questions.

Deliverables to City
ii. Updated PS&E addressing bidder questions
D. Review bid results
Dokken will review the bid results in order to identify any anomalies and/or inconsistencies between bids.

7. Construction Support
Architectural & Engineering (A&E) support services are retained on a Time and Materials (T&M) basis to provide construction support services, including:

A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as required Dokken understands that the Project is currently undergoing environmental analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) with Caltrans as the NEPA lead. Various technical studies, prepared by Dokken’s sub consultant ICF, were prepared in support of the NEPA environmental document including, but not limited to, a Natural Environment Study, Historic Resources Evaluation Report, Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment, and Visual Impact Assessment. All technical studies were prepared using 35% level design with multiple alternatives. Should final design deviate from the draft design used in the original NEPA technical studies, the NEPA environmental document will need to be revalidated and technical studies will need to be updated.

Dokken’s qualified environmental team will update all technical studies with the revised Project description and design features with exhibits to obtain a revalidated NEPA environmental document. This scope and fee assumes that final design will not substantially deviate from the approved draft design, and that new field surveys in support of the updated technical studies will not be required.

Deliverables to City
i. Updated Technical Studies, NEPA Revalidation
B. Engineering support during construction
Dokken will provide engineering support to the City and Resident Engineer during construction. Dokken will attend the pre-construction meeting. Construction meetings where significant engineering topics are discussed will be attended in-person or virtual. A maximum of 5 in-person meetings will be attended.

Dokken will provide written responses to RFIs on the Technical Provisions, the design drawings or conflicts in the design during the construction, and assist the City in issuing Change Orders (Cos). Contractor submittals including shop drawings will be reviewed.

Deliverables to City
i. Attend meetings
ii. Submittal and shop drawing review
iii. Review/approve falsework drawings &
calculations
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge z Federal Aid Project No. BHLO-5107(033)
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT – DESIGN SERVICES SP2060

iv. Request for Information Review
v. Prepare/Issue Delta revisions and plan
clarifications
vi. Review of potential Contract Change Order
documents
vii. Other engineering support services
viii. Review sign relocation and storage reports by
Historic consultant
ix. Responses to RFI’s
x. Review of Contractor Submittals
xi. Plan Revisions
C. Prepare Record Drawings
Dokken will prepare as-built plans of the project by incorporating all redline comments prepared by the contractor and Project Inspector on the signed design Plans. Electronic Record Drawings will be provided in AutoCAD format and Specifications in Microsoft Word to the City.

Deliverables to City
i. Record Drawings
D. Project Closeout
Dokken will be available to assist the City and CM team at project closeout time with items such as resolution of contractor’s final payment and permitting. In addition, Dokken retains documents electronically indefinitely and can support the City in case of HBP project auditing.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge Exhibit “B”
Budget
DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA

4.A.j
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ SUMMARY BY CONSULTANT

CITY OF SANTA MONICA
PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES
June 26, 2023
TASK DESCRIPTION DOKKEN ENGINEERING ARELLANO ASSOCIATES (DBE) BURNE ENGINEERING (DBE) DUDEK EARTH MECHANICS, INC. (DBE) GEOCON WEST, INC. GUIDA SURVEYING ICF JONES & STOKES, INC. MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC. P2S, INC. UNICO ENGINEERING (DBE) GHD MOTT MACDONALD WALKER CONSULTANTS GRAND TOTAL COST

1. Project Management $ 472,822.29 $ 19,510.38 $ ‐ 30,596.98 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ 522,929.65 A. Administration $ - 21,031.94 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,031.94 $ B. Project Schedule $ - 8,803.37 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,803.37 $ C. Manage Subconsultants $ - 110,928.45 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 110,928.45 $ D. Meetings, design schedule, budget 71,797.02 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 71,797.02 $ E. Quality Assurance/Quality Control 47,171.63 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 47,171.63 $ F. Design Coordination $ 19,510.38 213,089.88 $ 30,596.98 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 263,197.24 $

2. Design Services $ ‐ 1,545,521.14 $ $ ‐ 307,480.80 $ $ 314,990.48 $ 30,571.66 $ 98,478.99 $ 80,171.63 $ 88,793.55 $ 145,923.67 $ ‐ 61,796.54 $ $ ‐ 80,320.79 $ $ 2,754,049.25 A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals 67,251.12 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 61,796.54 $ - $ - $ - $ 129,047.66 $ B. Assemble Specifications $ - 46,534.66 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 46,534.66 $ C. Assemble Cost Estimate $ - 6,519.90 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,519.90 $ D. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE File 19,926.26 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,926.26 $ E. Surveying & Mapping $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 56,137.80 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 56,137.80 $ F. Bridge Design and Detailing $ - 453,556.73 $ 207,688.40 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 13,010.84 $ - $ - $ 80,320.79 $ - $ 754,576.77 $ G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier 2,283.47 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,283.47 $ H. Pier Sign $ - 66,341.98 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,495.17 $ - $ 6,582.31 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 94,419.46 $ I. Roadway Design $ - 295,354.50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,715.56 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 306,070.06 $ J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans 149,801.48 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 149,801.48 $ K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs 84,812.79 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 84,812.79 $ L. Geotechnical Recommendations $ - 1,141.73 $ - $ - $ 314,990.48 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 316,132.21 $ M. Landscape Design $ - 12,649.21 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 88,793.55 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 101,442.76 $ N. Utility Coordination & Design $ - 88,250.01 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 42,341.19 $ - $ - $ 24,492.34 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,083.54 $ O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) 11,958.16 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 59,996.16 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 71,954.32 $ P. Pier Widening & Modification $ - 136,707.59 $ 99,792.40 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 236,499.99 $ Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist 18,213.66 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 58,676.47 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 76,890.12 $ R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations 19,589.75 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 16,550.76 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,140.51 $ S. Lighting & Electrical Design $ - 53,577.36 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 14,575.69 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 68,153.05 $ T. Hazardous Waste $ - 11,050.78 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,571.66 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 41,622.44 $

3. Permit Assistance $ ‐ 40,396.34 $ ‐ $ $ ‐ 74,215.25 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ ‐ 6,685.97 $ $ ‐ 54,819.96 $ $ 92,338.97 $ 268,456.50 A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permit 9,704.74 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,704.74 $ B. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission Permit $ - 11,672.73 $ - $ 74,215.25 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 54,819.96 $ - $ 92,338.97 $ 233,046.91 $ C. Prepare submittal for State Lands Commission 7,180.90 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,180.90 $ D. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & Recreation 7,180.90 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,180.90 $ E. Support for other permits and approvals as needed 4,657.07 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,685.97 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,343.04 $

4. Funding Assistance $ ‐ 19,733.97 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ 19,733.97 A. Provide information for HBP documentation 19,733.97 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,733.97 $

5. Public Outreach $ 26,259.88 $ ‐ 195,942.31 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ 222,202.18 A. Public Outreach Plan $ 40,445.51 9,133.87 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 49,579.38 $ B. Stakeholder Database $ 3,816.69 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,816.69 $ C. Collateral Material $ 27,083.43 11,777.88 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 38,861.32 $ D. Photography/Videography $ 18,753.01 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,753.01 $ E. Website/Social Media $ 20,521.97 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,521.97 $ F. Community Meetings/Outreach Events $ 29,652.11 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 29,652.11 $ G. Attend Meetings/Presentations $ 16,020.25 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 16,020.25 $ H. Wayfinding $ 13,610.69 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 13,610.69 $ I. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies $ 26,038.65 5,348.12 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 31,386.77 $

6. Bidding Support $ ‐ 30,520.35 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ ‐ 8,529.65 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ 39,049.99 A. Attend meetings $ - 6,279.54 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,279.54 $ B. Respond to bidder inquiries $ - 12,907.60 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,529.65 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,437.25 $ C. Prepare bid addenda $ - 8,863.46 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,863.46 $ D. Review bid results $ - 2,469.75 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,469.75 $

7. Construction Support $ ‐ 299,230.39 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ ‐ 32,748.08 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ 331,978.47 A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as required 80,426.13 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80,426.13 $ B. Engineering support during construction 191,414.67 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 32,748.08 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 224,162.75 $ C. Prepare Record Drawings $ - 15,551.62 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,551.62 $ D. Project Closeout $ - 11,837.98 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,837.98 $ TOTAL COST 2,434,484.34 $ $ 215,452.69 $ 338,077.78 $ 74,215.25 $ 314,990.48 $ 30,571.66 $ 98,478.99 $ 80,171.63 $ 88,793.55 $ 193,887.37 $ 61,796.54 $ 54,819.96 $ 80,320.79 $ 92,338.97 $ 4,158,400.00

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023
Principal in Charge
QA/QC Manager
Tim Osterkamp, PE*
Project Manager
Rob Burns, SE*
Bridge Project Engineer
Eric Espinoza, PE*
Roadway Project Engineer
Joe Ostdiek, PE, TE*
Electrical Project Engineer
Amy Bakker
Environmental Lead
Senior Bridge Engineer2
Senior Roadway Engineer2
Senior Bridge Engineer1
Senior Roadway Engineer1
Associate Bridge Engineer2
Associate Roadway Engineer2
Associate Bridge Engineer
1 Associate Roadway Engineer1
Assistant Bridge Engineer2
FULLY BURDENED RATE $ 383.05 $ 338.86 $ 279.92 $ 253.41 $ 191.53 $ 206.26 $ 150.28 $ 241.62 $ 235.73 $ 218.05 $ 197.42 $ 176.79 $ 176.79 $ 162.06 $ 153.22 $ 138.49

1. Project Management 4 120 364 220 242 168 120 40 40 40 64 40 40 60 84 60 A. Administration 4 60 12B. Project Schedule 24 10C. Manage Subconsultants 100 120 120 80 60D. Meetings, design schedule, budget 80 60 60 48 20 24 24E. Quality Assurance/Quality Control 120 20F. Design Coordination 80 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 60 60 60

2. Design Services 210 280 407 420 49 248 100 504 390 388 112 680 871 440 A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals 40 28 31 10 60 40 49 i. PS&E submittals 8452 10 15
ii. Track and respond to comments 12 20 20 6 20 24
iii. Resubmit PS&E 8462 10 10iv. Constructability Review 12 60 B. Assemble Specifications 8 80 20 100C. Assemble Cost Estimate 888 6D. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE File 12 24 24 20 4E. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing 64 124 28 80 280 100 80 620 400 i. Superstructure design - design & Qs 30 40 80 360 160v. Assemble design & check calculations - check 2 32 80 240 120vi. Prepare special provisions 28vii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimate 248 20 viii. Demolition drawings/specifications 120 100 120ix. Staging plans 4 8 20 80 80x. Design of temporary pedestrian bridge 16 24xi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp 88 G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier 8 i. Wall Design 4ii. Wall Design Check 4
H. Pier Sign 14 56 4 16 56 16 60
i. Field visit 4844ii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Plan 8 20iii. Structural analysis and design of frame 16 4 24 60 iv. Provide new power source 8v. Assemble design & check calculations 2 8 vi. Prepare special provisions 2 8 32vii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimate 2 8 viii. Develop neon sign restoration plan
I. Roadway Design 20 79 102 15 16 74 32 32 460
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards) 10 5 40 16 10 32 32 20ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entrance 2 15 30 80iii. Lot 1 North Improvements 6 24 12 24 120

1. Lot 1 North Design 2 84 8 402. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk 2 84 8 403. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk 2 84 8 40 iv. ADA Improvements 15 20 100v. Final Signing/Striping plans 2 15 20 80vii. Quantity & Cost Estimate 5 10 15 10 60

TASK DESCRIPTION

DOKKEN ENGINEERING

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023
Principal in Charge
QA/QC Manager
Tim Osterkamp, PE*
Project Manager
Rob Burns, SE*
Bridge Project Engineer
Eric Espinoza, PE*
Roadway Project Engineer
Joe Ostdiek, PE, TE*
Electrical Project Engineer
Amy Bakker
Environmental Lead
Senior Bridge Engineer2
Senior Roadway Engineer2
Senior Bridge Engineer1
Senior Roadway Engineer1
Associate Bridge Engineer2
Associate Roadway Engineer2
Associate Bridge Engineer
1 Associate Roadway Engineer1
Assistant Bridge Engineer2
FULLY BURDENED RATE $ 383.05 $ 338.86 $ 279.92 $ 253.41 $ 191.53 $ 206.26 $ 150.28 $ 241.62 $ 235.73 $ 218.05 $ 197.42 $ 176.79 $ 176.79 $ 162.06 $ 153.22 $ 138.49

TASK DESCRIPTION

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans 12 56 52 62 242
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridge 2 48 10 20ii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 North 2 48 10 20iii. Staging plans for temporary ramp 24 10 20iv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Way 2 4 4 4 20v. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deck 84 4 40vi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exit 44 4 20vii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & West 44 4 20viii. Pedestrian/Bike detours 48 4 20ix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trail 44 4 20x. Special Provisions 2 84 42 xi. Quantity & Cost Estimate 2 84 4 40
K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs 5 104 i. General site drainage analysis 2 32ii. Drainage design for bridge 16iii. Stormwater BMP design 1 12iv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commission 1 12v. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commission 1 10vi. Special Provisions 12vii. Quantity & Cost Estimate 10 L. Geotechnical Recommendations 4
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Report 4ii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design 10
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction 10ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design 2 66 22 100 120
i. Utility coordination 2 16 12 40 40
ii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companies 24 10 iii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base map 52 40v. Design utility relocations 8 20vi. Special Provisions 30 2 20vii. Quantity & Cost Estimate 52 20 30 O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) 16 42 i. Design MEP & FP under pier 4ii. Review available as-built data 2iii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FP 4iv. Work with City on utilities relocations 16 16v. Prepare relocation plans 4vi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquarium 4vii. Special Provisions 4 viii. Quantity & Cost Estimate 4
P. Pier Widening & Modification 24 28 208 200
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built data 4 8ii. Prepare design and plans 20 20 160 100iii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roof 40 40v. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisions 8 60viii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023
Principal in Charge
QA/QC Manager
Tim Osterkamp, PE*
Project Manager
Rob Burns, SE*
Bridge Project Engineer
Eric Espinoza, PE*
Roadway Project Engineer
Joe Ostdiek, PE, TE*
Electrical Project Engineer
Amy Bakker
Environmental Lead
Senior Bridge Engineer2
Senior Roadway Engineer2
Senior Bridge Engineer1
Senior Roadway Engineer1
Associate Bridge Engineer2
Associate Roadway Engineer2
Associate Bridge Engineer
1 Associate Roadway Engineer1
Assistant Bridge Engineer2
FULLY BURDENED RATE $ 383.05 $ 338.86 $ 279.92 $ 253.41 $ 191.53 $ 206.26 $ 150.28 $ 241.62 $ 235.73 $ 218.05 $ 197.42 $ 176.79 $ 176.79 $ 162.06 $ 153.22 $ 138.49

TASK DESCRIPTION

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist 10 4 32
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings 2iii. Perform design reviews 4 iv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan 8 32
R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations 4 40 40
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactor 4ii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall 40 40 S. Lighting & Electrical Design 144
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenue 40ii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edge 40iii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supply 20iv. Design electrical for pier sign 12v. Special Provisions 20vi. Quantity & Cost Estimate 12 T. Hazardous Waste 34
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Plan 10ii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services 24

3. Permit Assistance 28 85 45
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permit 8 30 10
B. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission Permit 45 5 C. Prepare submittal for State Lands Commission 6 20 10D. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & Recreation 6 20 10E. Support for other permits and approvals as needed 4 10 10

4. Funding Assistance 2 12 24 10 40
A. Provide information for HBP documentation 2 12 24 10 40

5. Public Outreach 48 4
A. Public Outreach Plan 32B. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies 16 4

6. Bidding Support 18 2 32 16 4 4 4 28 28 2
A. Attend meetings 8 6 44B. Respond to bidder inquiries 4 8 6 4 4 16 16 2C. Prepare bid addenda 2 16 4 12 12 D. Review bid results 4222

7. Construction Support 140 92 88 68 40 60 40 8 68 228 160 40 180 A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as required 20 24 24 20 60 60B. Engineering support during construction 100 60 80 60 8 40 40 160 160 40 160 C. Prepare Record Drawings 4444 8 20
D. Project Closeout 16 4 4 4 8 8 8
TOTAL HOURS 6 120 820 594 858 672 213 376 194 552 522 724 340 780 1,182 500 TOTAL COST $ 40,662.67 2,298.32 $ 229,537.84 $ 150,522.57 $ 164,330.25 $ 138,606.65 $ 32,008.60 $ 90,848.63 $ 45,730.77 $ 120,361.50 $ 103,053.34 $ 127,999.00 $ 60,110.03 $ 126,407.89 $ 181,107.93 $ 69,244.40 $ PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK 0.06% 0.98% 5.52% 3.62% 3.95% 3.33% 0.77% 2.18% 1.10% 2.89% 2.48% 3.08% 1.45% 3.04% 4.36% 1.67%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Assistant Roadway Engineer2
Assistant Bridge Engineer1
Assistant Roadway Engineer1
Senior CAD
CAD/Detailer
Environmental Manager
Senior Environmental Planner
Associate Environmental
Planner
Environmental Planner TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 138.49 $ 111.97 $ 111.97 $ 209.21 $ 144.38 $ 235.73 $ 167.95 $ 144.38 $ 94.29 167.87% 10.00% 60 44 40 40 40 28 20 20 40 2038 146,898.00 $ $ 2,891.15 $ 251,451.05 $ 40,124.02 $ 31,458.07 $ 472,822.29 76 7,000.00 $ 137.77 $ 11,982.17 $ 1,911.99 $ 21,031.94 $ 34 2,930.00 $ 57.67 $ 5,015.40 $ 800.31 $ 8,803.37 $ 8 488 36,920.00 $ 726.64 $ 63,197.41 $ 10,084.40 $ 110,928.45 $ 316 23,896.00 $ 470.31 $ 40,903.72 $ 6,527.00 $ 71,797.02 $ 140 15,700.00 $ 309.00 $ 26,874.30 $ 4,288.33 $ 47,171.63 $ 60 44 40 40 40 20 20 20 40 984 60,452.00 $ 1,189.78 $ 103,478.05 $ 16,511.98 $ 31,458.07 $ 213,089.88 $ 215 2745 716 228 11 82 58 59 9213 514,225.00 $ $ 10,120.64 $ 880,219.03 $ 140,456.47 $ 500.00 $ 1,545,521.14 82 4 344 22,383.00 $ 440.53 $ 38,313.86 $ 6,113.74 $ - $ 67,251.12 $ 30 74 4,159.00 $ 81.85 $ 7,119.12 $ 1,136.00 $ 12,495.98 $ 32 4 138 8,580.00 $ 168.87 $ 14,686.72 $ 2,343.56 $ 25,779.15 $ 20 60 3,584.00 $ 70.54 $ 6,134.87 $ 978.94 $ 10,768.35 $ 72 6,060.00 $ 119.27 $ 10,373.14 $ 1,655.24 $ 18,207.65 $ 208 15,488.00 $ 304.82 $ 26,511.41 $ 4,230.42 $ 46,534.66 $ 30 2,170.00 $ 42.71 $ 3,714.47 $ 592.72 $ 6,519.90 $ 84 6,632.00 $ 130.53 $ 11,352.25 $ 1,811.48 $ 19,926.26 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
580 8 2,364 150,956.00 $ 2,971.02 $ 258,397.28 $ 41,232.43 $ - $ 453,556.73 $ 320 8 998 62,642.00 $ 1,232.88 $ 107,226.76 $ 17,110.16 $ 188,211.80 $ 120 594 36,222.00 $ 712.90 $ 62,002.61 $ 9,893.75 $ 108,831.26 $ 10 878.00 $ 17.28 $ 1,502.91 $ 239.82 $ 2,638.01 $ 34 2,154.00 $ 42.39 $ 3,687.09 $ 588.35 $ 6,471.83 $ 140 480 30,460.00 $ 599.49 $ 52,139.57 $ 8,319.91 $ 91,518.97 $ 192 13,568.00 $ 267.04 $ 23,224.88 $ 3,705.99 $ 40,765.90 $ 40 3,584.00 $ 70.54 $ 6,134.87 $ 978.94 $ 10,768.35 $ 16 1,448.00 $ 28.50 $ 2,478.60 $ 395.51 $ 4,350.61 $ 8 760.00 $ 14.96 $ 1,300.92 $ 207.59 $ - $ 2,283.47 $ 4 380.00 $ 7.48 $ 650.46 $ 103.79 $ 1,141.73 $ 4 380.00 $ 7.48 $ 650.46 $ 103.79 $ 1,141.73 $ 16 40 2 40 320 21,914.00 $ 431.30 $ 37,511.05 $ 5,985.63 $ 500.00 $ 66,341.98 $ 20 1,608.00 $ 31.65 $ 2,752.48 $ 439.21 $ 500.00 $ 5,331.34 $ 2 32 62 4,464.00 $ 87.86 $ 7,641.20 $ 1,219.31 $ 13,412.37 $ 16 40 160 10,020.00 $ 197.21 $ 17,151.63 $ 2,736.88 $ 30,105.72 $ 8 560.00 $ 11.02 $ 958.57 $ 152.96 $ 1,682.55 $
10 652.00 $ 12.83 $ 1,116.05 $ 178.09 $ 1,958.97 $
42 3,502.00 $ 68.92 $ 5,994.51 $ 956.54 $ 10,521.98 $ 10 652.00 $ 12.83 $ 1,116.05 $ 178.09 $ 1,958.97 $ 8 8 456.00 $ 8.97 $ 780.55 $ 124.55 $ 1,370.08 $
1250 40 2,120 98,302.00 $ 1,934.72 $ 168,267.38 $ 26,850.41 $ - $ 295,354.50 $ 60 40 265 15,049.00 $ 296.18 $ 25,759.96 $ 4,110.51 $ 45,215.66 $ 220 347 15,695.00 $ 308.90 $ 26,865.74 $ 4,286.96 $ 47,156.61 $ 330 516 23,358.00 $ 459.72 $ 39,982.80 $ 6,380.05 $ - $ 70,180.57 $ 110 172 7,786.00 $ 153.24 $ 13,327.60 $ 2,126.68 $ 23,393.52 $ 110 172 7,786.00 $ 153.24 $ 13,327.60 $ 2,126.68 $ 23,393.52 $ 110 172 7,786.00 $ 153.24 $ 13,327.60 $ 2,126.68 $ 23,393.52 $ 280 415 18,215.00 $ 358.50 $ 31,179.33 $ 4,975.28 $ 54,728.11 $ 240 357 15,845.00 $ 311.85 $ 27,122.51 $ 4,327.94 $ 47,607.29 $ 120 220 10,140.00 $ 199.57 $ 17,357.03 $ 2,769.66 $ 30,466.26 $ DOKKEN ENGINEERING CONT.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Assistant Roadway Engineer2
Assistant Bridge Engineer1
Assistant Roadway Engineer1
Senior CAD
CAD/Detailer
Environmental Manager
Senior Environmental Planner
Associate Environmental
Planner
Environmental Planner TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 138.49 $ 111.97 $ 111.97 $ 209.21 $ 144.38 $ 235.73 $ 167.95 $ 144.38 $ 94.29 167.87% 10.00% DOKKEN ENGINEERING CONT.
650 1,074 49,858.00 $ 981.27 $ 85,343.89 $ 13,618.32 $ - $ 149,801.48 $ 60 104 5,000.00 $ 98.41 $ 8,558.70 $ 1,365.71 $ 15,022.81 $ 60 104 5,000.00 $ 98.41 $ 8,558.70 $ 1,365.71 $ 15,022.81 $ 60 96 4,440.00 $ 87.39 $ 7,600.12 $ 1,212.75 $ 13,340.26 $ 60 94 4,318.00 $ 84.98 $ 7,391.29 $ 1,179.43 $ 12,973.70 $ 110 166 7,328.00 $ 144.22 $ 12,543.62 $ 2,001.58 $ 22,017.43 $ 60 92 4,128.00 $ 81.24 $ 7,066.06 $ 1,127.53 $ 12,402.83 $ 60 92 4,128.00 $ 81.24 $ 7,066.06 $ 1,127.53 $ 12,402.83 $ 60 96 4,408.00 $ 86.76 $ 7,545.35 $ 1,204.01 $ 13,244.11 $ 60 92 4,128.00 $ 81.24 $ 7,066.06 $ 1,127.53 $ 12,402.83 $ 20 1,362.00 $ 26.81 $ 2,331.39 $ 372.02 $ 4,092.21 $
60 118 5,618.00 $ 110.57 $ 9,616.55 $ 1,534.51 $ 16,879.63 $ 215 285 609 28,228.00 $ 555.57 $ 48,318.97 $ 7,710.25 $ - $ 84,812.79 $ 60 120 214 9,654.00 $ 190.00 $ 16,525.13 $ 2,636.91 $ 29,006.05 $ 40 30 86 4,092.00 $ 80.54 $ 7,004.44 $ 1,117.70 $ 12,294.67 $ 20 40 73 3,329.00 $ 65.52 $ 5,698.38 $ 909.29 $ 10,002.19 $ 45 45 103 4,694.00 $ 92.38 $ 8,034.90 $ 1,282.13 $ 14,103.42 $ 20 20 51 2,435.00 $ 47.92 $ 4,168.08 $ 665.10 $ 7,316.11 $ 10 10 32 1,654.00 $ 32.55 $ 2,831.22 $ 451.78 $ 4,969.55 $ 20 20 50 2,370.00 $ 46.64 $ 4,056.82 $ 647.35 $ 7,120.81 $ 4 380.00 $ 7.48 $ 650.46 $ 103.79 $ - $ 1,141.73 $ 4 380.00 $ 7.48 $ 650.46 $ 103.79 $ 1,141.73 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
5 10 30 35 90 4,210.00 $ 82.86 $ 7,206.42 $ 1,149.93 $ - $ 12,649.21 $ 10 650.00 $ 12.79 $ 1,112.63 $ 177.54 $ 1,952.97 $
5 10 30 35 80 3,560.00 $ 70.07 $ 6,093.79 $ 972.39 $ 10,696.24 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
274 584 29,372.00 $ 578.08 $ 50,277.20 $ 8,022.73 $ - $ 88,250.01 $ 70 180 9,490.00 $ 186.78 $ 16,244.40 $ 2,592.12 $ 28,513.30 $ 24 40 1,842.00 $ 36.25 $ 3,153.02 $ 503.13 $ 5,534.40 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
120 167 7,105.00 $ 139.84 $ 12,161.91 $ 1,940.67 $ 21,347.42 $ 28 1,860.00 $ 36.61 $ 3,183.83 $ 508.04 $ 5,588.49 $ 52 3,430.00 $ 67.51 $ 5,871.27 $ 936.88 $ 10,305.65 $ 60 117 5,645.00 $ 111.10 $ 9,662.77 $ 1,541.89 $ 16,960.76 $ 58 3,980.00 $ 78.33 $ 6,812.72 $ 1,087.11 $ - $ 11,958.16 $ 4 280.00 $ 5.51 $ 479.29 $ 76.48 $ 841.28 $ 2 140.00 $ 2.76 $ 239.64 $ 38.24 $ 420.64 $ 4 280.00 $ 5.51 $ 479.29 $ 76.48 $ 841.28 $ 32 2,160.00 $ 42.51 $ 3,697.36 $ 589.99 $ 6,489.85 $
4 280.00 $ 5.51 $ 479.29 $ 76.48 $ 841.28 $ 4 280.00 $ 5.51 $ 479.29 $ 76.48 $ 841.28 $ 4 280.00 $ 5.51 $ 479.29 $ 76.48 $ 841.28 $ 4 280.00 $ 5.51 $ 479.29 $ 76.48 $ 841.28 $ 120 100 680 45,500.00 $ 895.50 $ 77,884.13 $ 12,427.96 $ - $ 136,707.59 $ 12 972.00 $ 19.13 $ 1,663.81 $ 265.49 $ 2,920.43 $
80 100 480 32,040.00 $ 630.59 $ 54,844.12 $ 8,751.47 $ 96,266.18 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
80 5,360.00 $ 105.49 $ 9,174.92 $ 1,464.04 $ 16,104.45 $ 40 40 2,840.00 $ 55.90 $ 4,861.34 $ 775.72 $ 8,532.96 $ 68 4,288.00 $ 84.39 $ 7,339.94 $ 1,171.23 $ 12,883.56 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Assistant Roadway Engineer2
Assistant Bridge Engineer1
Assistant Roadway Engineer1
Senior CAD
CAD/Detailer
Environmental Manager
Senior Environmental Planner
Associate Environmental
Planner
Environmental Planner TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 138.49 $ 111.97 $ 111.97 $ 209.21 $ 144.38 $ 235.73 $ 167.95 $ 144.38 $ 94.29 167.87% 10.00% DOKKEN ENGINEERING CONT.
4 32 82 6,062.00 $ 119.31 $ 10,376.56 $ 1,655.79 $ - $ 18,213.66 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
2 190.00 $ 3.74 $ 325.23 $ 51.90 $ 570.87 $ 4 344.00 $ 6.77 $ 588.84 $ 93.96 $ 1,033.57 $ 4 32 76 5,528.00 $ 108.80 $ 9,462.49 $ 1,509.93 $ 16,609.22 $ 40 124 6,520.00 $ 128.32 $ 11,160.54 $ 1,780.89 $ - $ 19,589.75 $ 4 280.00 $ 5.51 $ 479.29 $ 76.48 $ 841.28 $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
40 120 6,240.00 $ 122.81 $ 10,681.25 $ 1,704.41 $ 18,748.47 $ 204 348 17,832.00 $ 350.96 $ 30,523.73 $ 4,870.67 $ - $ 53,577.36 $ 80 120 5,840.00 $ 114.94 $ 9,996.56 $ 1,595.15 $ 17,546.64 $ 80 120 5,840.00 $ 114.94 $ 9,996.56 $ 1,595.15 $ 17,546.64 $ 12 32 1,856.00 $ 36.53 $ 3,176.99 $ 506.95 $ 5,576.47 $ 8 20 1,144.00 $ 22.52 $ 1,958.23 $ 312.47 $ 3,437.22 $ 4 24 1,552.00 $ 30.55 $ 2,656.62 $ 423.92 $ 4,663.08 $ 20 32 1,600.00 $ 31.49 $ 2,738.78 $ 437.03 $ 4,807.30 $ 24 24 82 3,678.00 $ 72.39 $ 6,295.78 $ 1,004.62 $ - $ 11,050.78 $ 10 510.00 $ 10.04 $ 872.99 $ 139.30 $ 1,532.33 $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
24 24 72 3,168.00 $ 62.35 $ 5,422.79 $ 865.31 $ 9,518.45 $ 8 40 206 13,445.00 $ $ 264.62 $ 23,014.33 $ ‐ 3,672.39 $ $ 40,396.34 48 3,230.00 $ 63.57 $ 5,528.92 $ 882.25 $ 9,704.74 $
8 40 62 3,885.00 $ 76.46 $ 6,650.11 $ 1,061.16 $ 11,672.73 $ 36 2,390.00 $ 47.04 $ 4,091.06 $ 652.81 $ 7,180.90 $ 36 2,390.00 $ 47.04 $ 4,091.06 $ 652.81 $ 7,180.90 $ 24 1,550.00 $ 30.51 $ 2,653.20 $ 423.37 $ 4,657.07 $ 88 6,568.00 $ $ 129.27 $ 11,242.70 $ ‐ 1,794.00 $ $ 19,733.97 88 6,568.00 $ 129.27 $ 11,242.70 $ 1,794.00 $ 19,733.97 $ 80 132 8,740.00 $ $ 172.01 $ 14,960.60 $ ‐ 2,387.26 $ $ 26,259.88 32 3,040.00 $ 59.83 $ 5,203.69 $ 830.35 $ 9,133.87 $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
80 80 3,920.00 $ 77.15 $ 6,710.02 $ 1,070.72 $ 11,777.88 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
20 1,780.00 $ 35.03 $ 3,046.90 $ 486.19 $ 5,348.12 $
2 12 152 10,158.00 $ $ 199.92 $ 17,387.85 $ ‐ 2,774.58 $ $ 30,520.35 8 30 2,090.00 $ 41.13 $ 3,577.53 $ 570.87 $ 6,279.54 $
2 4 66 4,296.00 $ 84.55 $ 7,353.63 $ 1,173.42 $ 12,907.60 $ 46 2,950.00 $ 58.06 $ 5,049.63 $ 805.77 $ 8,863.46 $ 10 822.00 $ 16.18 $ 1,407.05 $ 224.52 $ 2,469.75 $ 112 24 8 80 80 100 1,616 99,592.00 $ $ 1,960.11 $ 170,475.52 $ ‐ 27,202.76 $ $ 299,230.39 8 80 80 100 476 26,768.00 $ 526.83 $ 45,819.83 $ 7,311.47 $ 80,426.13 $ 80 988 63,708.00 $ 1,253.86 $ 109,051.47 $ 17,401.33 $ 191,414.67 $ 32 24 100 5,176.00 $ 101.87 $ 8,859.96 $ 1,413.78 $ 15,551.62 $ 52 3,940.00 $ 77.54 $ 6,744.25 $ 1,076.18 $ 11,837.98 $ 275 44 2,899 756 372 55 234 158 199 13,445
$ 4,926.67 38,084.42 $ 324,600.16 $ 158,160.11 $ 53,710.07 $ 12,964.91 $ 39,301.35 $ 22,812.34 $ 18,763.75 $ 799,626.00 $ 15,737.72 $ 1,368,751.08 $ 218,411.48 $ 31,958.07 $ $ 2,434,484.34

0.92% 0.12% 7.81% 3.80% 1.29% 0.31% 0.95% 0.55% 0.45%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Margaret Meadows
Project Manager
Thomas Reese
Senior Project Coordinator
Matt Evans
Senior Project Coordinator
Sohrab Mikanik
Tech Lead
Kyle Santiago
Creative Lead
Issac Chavez
Project Coordinator TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 160.81 $ 106.38 $ 98.96 $ 173.18 $ 136.07 $ 59.38 124.91% 10.00% 30 30 50 20 50 180 7,540.00 $ $ 346.14 $ 9,850.57 $ ‐ 1,773.67 $ $ 19,510.38 $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 30 30 50 20 50 180 7,540.00 $ 346.14 $ 9,850.57 $ 1,773.67 $ 19,510.38 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

ARELLANO ASSOCIATES (DBE)

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Margaret Meadows
Project Manager
Thomas Reese
Senior Project Coordinator
Matt Evans
Senior Project Coordinator
Sohrab Mikanik
Tech Lead
Kyle Santiago
Creative Lead
Issac Chavez
Project Coordinator TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 160.81 $ 106.38 $ 98.96 $ 173.18 $ 136.07 $ 59.38 124.91% 10.00%

ARELLANO ASSOCIATES (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Margaret Meadows
Project Manager
Thomas Reese
Senior Project Coordinator
Matt Evans
Senior Project Coordinator
Sohrab Mikanik
Tech Lead
Kyle Santiago
Creative Lead
Issac Chavez
Project Coordinator TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 160.81 $ 106.38 $ 98.96 $ 173.18 $ 136.07 $ 59.38 124.91% 10.00%

ARELLANO ASSOCIATES (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
295 315 374 2 132 394 1,512 64,536.00 $ $ 2,962.64 $ 84,312.55 $ 15,181.12 $ 28,950.00 $ 195,942.31 85 85 44 2 2 24 242 11,766.00 $ 540.14 $ 15,371.60 $ 2,767.77 $ 10,000.00 $ 40,445.51 $ 5 10 30 45 1,475.00 $ 67.71 $ 1,927.00 $ 346.97 $ 3,816.69 $ 30 25 25 50 25 155 7,375.00 $ 338.56 $ 9,635.01 $ 1,734.86 $ 8,000.00 $ 27,083.43 $ 25 25 25 25 10 110 5,315.00 $ 243.99 $ 6,943.74 $ 1,250.27 $ 5,000.00 $ 18,753.01 $ 25 45 45 25 45 185 7,815.00 $ 358.76 $ 10,209.85 $ 1,838.36 $ 300.00 $ 20,521.97 $ 25 25 100 150 300 10,300.00 $ 472.84 $ 13,456.35 $ 2,422.92 $ 3,000.00 $ 29,652.11 $ 25 25 45 60 155 5,940.00 $ 272.69 $ 7,760.27 $ 1,397.30 $ 650.00 $ 16,020.25 $ 25 25 40 40 130 5,260.00 $ 241.47 $ 6,871.89 $ 1,237.34 $ 13,610.69 $ 50 50 50 30 10 190 9,290.00 $ 426.47 $ 12,136.85 $ 2,185.33 $ 2,000.00 $ 26,038.65 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
325 345 424 2 152 444 1,692
$ 36,701.93 52,263.48 $ 41,959.21 $ 346.36 $ 20,682.73 $ 26,363.03 $ 72,076.00 $ 3,308.77 $ 94,163.12 $ 16,954.79 $ 28,950.00 $ $ 215,452.69

1.26% 0.88% 1.01% 0.01% 0.50% 0.63%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Lori Burne
QA/QC Manager
Molly Iley
SR Bridge Engineer
Staff EngineerI
Michael Capili
Staff Engineer II
Assistant Engineer
Sr CADD Technician
Drafting Technician II
Admin/Clerical TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 226.48 $ 210.97 $ 124.10 $ 108.59 $ 77.56 $ 217.17 $ 96.95 $ 77.56 182.04% 10.00% 20 50 8 50 40 168 9,730.00 $ $ 132.23 $ 17,953.20 $ ‐ 2,781.54 $ $ 30,596.98 $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
20 50 8 50 40 168 9,730.00 $ 132.23 $ 17,953.20 $ 2,781.54 $ 30,596.98 $ 200 459 64 526 145 280 214 18 1906 97,144.50 $ $ 1,320.19 $ 179,245.13 $ 27,770.98 $ 2,000.00 $ 307,480.80 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 48 451 234 145 280 12 1170 65,887.00 $ 895.40 $ 121,570.69 $ 18,835.31 $ 500.00 $ 207,688.40 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
32 320 146 100 200 6 804 45,856.00 $ 623.18 $ 84,610.70 $ 13,108.99 $ 144,198.88 $ 16 131 88 45 80 6 366 20,031.00 $ 272.22 $ 36,959.98 $ 5,726.32 $ 500.00 $ 63,489.53 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

BURNE ENGINEERING (DBE)

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Lori Burne
QA/QC Manager
Molly Iley
SR Bridge Engineer
Staff EngineerI
Michael Capili
Staff Engineer II
Assistant Engineer
Sr CADD Technician
Drafting Technician II
Admin/Clerical TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 226.48 $ 210.97 $ 124.10 $ 108.59 $ 77.56 $ 217.17 $ 96.95 $ 77.56 182.04% 10.00%

BURNE ENGINEERING (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 152 8 64 292 214 6 736 31,257.50 $ 424.79 $ 57,674.44 $ 8,935.67 $ 1,500.00 $ 99,792.40 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
152 8 64 292 214 6 736 31,257.50 $ 424.79 $ 57,674.44 $ 8,935.67 $ 1,500.00 $ 99,792.40 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Lori Burne
QA/QC Manager
Molly Iley
SR Bridge Engineer
Staff EngineerI
Michael Capili
Staff Engineer II
Assistant Engineer
Sr CADD Technician
Drafting Technician II
Admin/Clerical TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 226.48 $ 210.97 $ 124.10 $ 108.59 $ 77.56 $ 217.17 $ 96.95 $ 77.56 182.04% 10.00%

BURNE ENGINEERING (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 220 509 72 576 145 320 214 18 2,074
$ 107,381.64 49,825.18 $ 8,935.03 $ 62,545.19 $ 11,246.35 $ 69,494.66 $ 20,747.58 $ 1,396.10 $ 106,874.50 $ 1,452.42 $ 197,198.33 $ 30,552.53 $ 2,000.00 $ $ 338,077.78

1.20% 2.58% 0.21% 1.50% 0.27% 1.67% 0.50% 0.03%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Jason Reynolds, Director
Sarah Richmond, Spec.V
Carolyn Groves, Spec. II
GIS Analyst III, TBD
Technical Editor II, TBD
Pubs Spec. II, TBD TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 277.99 $ 158.27 $ 121.12 $ 122.30 $ 107.91 $ 95.68 161.61% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
DUDEK

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Jason Reynolds, Director
Sarah Richmond, Spec.V
Carolyn Groves, Spec. II
GIS Analyst III, TBD
Technical Editor II, TBD
Pubs Spec. II, TBD TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 277.99 $ 158.27 $ 121.12 $ 122.30 $ 107.91 $ 95.68 161.61% 10.00% DUDEK
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Jason Reynolds, Director
Sarah Richmond, Spec.V
Carolyn Groves, Spec. II
GIS Analyst III, TBD
Technical Editor II, TBD
Pubs Spec. II, TBD TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 277.99 $ 158.27 $ 121.12 $ 122.30 $ 107.91 $ 95.68 161.61% 10.00% DUDEK
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
54 85 280 36 30 23 508 25,096.35 $ $ 644.47 $ 41,599.75 $ 6,734.06 $ 140.63 $ 74,215.25 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
54 85 280 36 30 23 508 25,096.35 $ 644.47 $ 41,599.75 $ 6,734.06 $ 140.63 $ 74,215.25 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
54 85 280 36 30 23 508
$ 13,453.30 15,011.29 $ 33,914.38 $ 4,402.90 $ 3,237.42 $ 2,200.73 $ 25,096.35 $ 644.47 $ 41,599.75 $ 6,734.06 $ 140.63 $ $ 74,215.25

0.36% 0.32% 0.82% 0.11% 0.08% 0.05%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 191
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Eric Brown
Project Manager
Hubert Law
Principal Engineer
Pat Wilson
Senior Engineer
Michael Hoshiyama
Senior Project Geologist
Dane Nicklaus
Project Engineer
Bernardo Ambriz
Senior Staff Engineer
Doug Brown
Staff Engineer
Kiat Kaekul
Senior Technician
Edson Amaro
Technician TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 299.80 $ 299.80 $ 212.65 $ 185.95 $ 156.80 $ 144.22 $ 103.10 $ 154.66 $ 79.78 178.96% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
91 14 28 96 96 372 393 121 105 1316 62,439.30 $ $1,512.68 114,448.46 $ $ 17,840.04 $ 118,750.00 $ 314,990.48 $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
EARTH MECHANICS, INC. (DBE)

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Eric Brown
Project Manager
Hubert Law
Principal Engineer
Pat Wilson
Senior Engineer
Michael Hoshiyama
Senior Project Geologist
Dane Nicklaus
Project Engineer
Bernardo Ambriz
Senior Staff Engineer
Doug Brown
Staff Engineer
Kiat Kaekul
Senior Technician
Edson Amaro
Technician TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 299.80 $ 299.80 $ 212.65 $ 185.95 $ 156.80 $ 144.22 $ 103.10 $ 154.66 $ 79.78 178.96% 10.00% EARTH MECHANICS, INC. (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
91 14 28 96 96 372 393 121 105 1,316 62,439.30 $ $1,512.68 114,448.46 $ 17,840.04 $ $118,750.00 314,990.48 $ 91 14 28 96 96 372 393 121 105 1,316 62,439.30 $ $1,512.68 114,448.46 $ 17,840.04 $ $118,750.00 314,990.48 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Eric Brown
Project Manager
Hubert Law
Principal Engineer
Pat Wilson
Senior Engineer
Michael Hoshiyama
Senior Project Geologist
Dane Nicklaus
Project Engineer
Bernardo Ambriz
Senior Staff Engineer
Doug Brown
Staff Engineer
Kiat Kaekul
Senior Technician
Edson Amaro
Technician TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 299.80 $ 299.80 $ 212.65 $ 185.95 $ 156.80 $ 144.22 $ 103.10 $ 154.66 $ 79.78 178.96% 10.00% EARTH MECHANICS, INC. (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
91 14 28 96 96 372 393 121 105 1,316
$ 4,197.18 27,281.65 $ 5,954.23 $ 17,851.65 $ 15,053.13 $ 53,650.70 $ 40,519.71 $ 18,713.30 $ 8,377.17 $ 62,439.30 $ $1,512.68 114,448.46 $ 17,840.04 $ 118,750.00 $ $ 314,990.48

0.66% 0.10% 0.14% 0.43% 0.36% 1.29% 0.97% 0.45% 0.20%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Associate
Senior Engineer/Geologist
Asbestos Consultant
Staff Engineer/Geologist
Staff (PW)
Technical Typist/Drafting
Industrial Hygienist TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 258.32 $ 215.35 $ 152.14 $ 97.07 $ 183.02 $ 80.73 $ 193.74 185.00% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 3 17 48 28 24 14 2 136 6,496.54 $ $ 12,018.60 $ 1,851.51 $ 10,205.00 $ 30,571.66 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
GEOCON WEST, INC.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Associate
Senior Engineer/Geologist
Asbestos Consultant
Staff Engineer/Geologist
Staff (PW)
Technical Typist/Drafting
Industrial Hygienist TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 258.32 $ 215.35 $ 152.14 $ 97.07 $ 183.02 $ 80.73 $ 193.74 185.00% 10.00% GEOCON WEST, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Associate
Senior Engineer/Geologist
Asbestos Consultant
Staff Engineer/Geologist
Staff (PW)
Technical Typist/Drafting
Industrial Hygienist TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 258.32 $ 215.35 $ 152.14 $ 97.07 $ 183.02 $ 80.73 $ 193.74 185.00% 10.00% GEOCON WEST, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 3 17 48 28 24 14 2 136 6,496.54 $ 12,018.60 $ 1,851.51 $ 10,205.00 $ 30,571.66 $ 3 17 48 28 24 14 2 136 6,496.54 $ 12,018.60 $ 1,851.51 $ 10,205.00 $ 30,571.66 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
3 17 48 28 24 14 2 136
$ 3,660.87 774.97 $ 7,302.80 $ 2,717.83 $ 4,392.54 $ 1,130.17 $ 387.49 $ 6,496.54 $ 12,018.60 $ 1,851.51 $ 10,205.00 $ $ 30,571.66

0.02% 0.09% 0.18% 0.07% 0.11% 0.03% 0.01%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Lisa Spivak, PLS
Survey Manager
Justin Height, PLS
Sr. Project Surveyor
Project Surveyor
Sr. Survey Analyst
Survey Analyst
Survey Technician
PLS Party Chief**
Certified Party Chief**
Chainman**
Apprentice(Avg)** TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 324.21 $ 243.96 $ 224.70 $ 176.55 $ 160.50 $ 128.40 $ 219.12 $ 204.03 $ 174.24 $ 121.98 191.82% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
24 20 16 40 76 40 48 90 114 24 492 28,760.80 $ $ 55,168.97 $ 8,392.98 $ 6,156.25 $ 98,478.99 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
14 20 72 80 56 24 266 15,570.48 $ 29,867.29 $ 4,543.78 $ 6,156.25 $ 56,137.80 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

GUIDA SURVEYING

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Lisa Spivak, PLS
Survey Manager
Justin Height, PLS
Sr. Project Surveyor
Project Surveyor
Sr. Survey Analyst
Survey Analyst
Survey Technician
PLS Party Chief**
Certified Party Chief**
Chainman**
Apprentice(Avg)** TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 324.21 $ 243.96 $ 224.70 $ 176.55 $ 160.50 $ 128.40 $ 219.12 $ 204.03 $ 174.24 $ 121.98 191.82% 10.00%

GUIDA SURVEYING
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
10 16 40 4 40 48 10 58 226 13,190.32 $ 25,301.67 $ 3,849.20 $ - $ 42,341.19 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
10 16 40 4 40 48 10 58 226 13,190.32 $ 25,301.67 $ 3,849.20 $ 42,341.19 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Lisa Spivak, PLS
Survey Manager
Justin Height, PLS
Sr. Project Surveyor
Project Surveyor
Sr. Survey Analyst
Survey Analyst
Survey Technician
PLS Party Chief**
Certified Party Chief**
Chainman**
Apprentice(Avg)** TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 324.21 $ 243.96 $ 224.70 $ 176.55 $ 160.50 $ 128.40 $ 219.12 $ 204.03 $ 174.24 $ 121.98 191.82% 10.00%

GUIDA SURVEYING
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
24 20 16 40 76 40 48 90 114 24 492
$ 4,879.23 7,781.09 $ 3,595.22 $ 7,062.04 $ 12,198.08 $ 5,136.03 $ 10,517.57 $ 18,362.60 $ 19,863.35 $ 2,927.54 $ 28,760.80 $ 55,168.97 $ 8,392.98 $ 6,156.25 $ $ 98,478.99

0.19% 0.12% 0.09% 0.17% 0.29% 0.12% 0.25% 0.44% 0.48% 0.07%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Jessica Feldman
Senior Consultant III
John Heller
Project Director
Molly Iker‐Johnson
Associate Consultant II
Milagros Mujica
Associate Consultant II
Brittany Buscombe
Senior Consultant II
Elizabeth Irvin
Senior Consultant III
Jenelle Mountain‐Castro
Associate Consultant II TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 159.94 $ 216.06 $ 110.80 $ 103.88 $ 141.50 $ 155.82 $ 130.53 161.89% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 32 158 200 66 14 32 14 516 26,751.50 $ $ 977.57 $ 44,890.59 $ 7,261.97 $ 290.00 $ 80,171.63 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 12 40 60 20 4 4 2 142 7,198.50 $ 263.05 $ 12,079.51 $ 1,954.11 $ - $ 21,495.17 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
12 40 60 20 4 4 2 142 7,198.50 $ 263.05 $ 12,079.51 $ 1,954.11 $ 21,495.17 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ ICF JONES & STOKES, INC.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Jessica Feldman
Senior Consultant III
John Heller
Project Director
Molly Iker‐Johnson
Associate Consultant II
Milagros Mujica
Associate Consultant II
Brittany Buscombe
Senior Consultant II
Elizabeth Irvin
Senior Consultant III
Jenelle Mountain‐Castro
Associate Consultant II TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 159.94 $ 216.06 $ 110.80 $ 103.88 $ 141.50 $ 155.82 $ 130.53 161.89% 10.00% ICF JONES & STOKES, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Jessica Feldman
Senior Consultant III
John Heller
Project Director
Molly Iker‐Johnson
Associate Consultant II
Milagros Mujica
Associate Consultant II
Brittany Buscombe
Senior Consultant II
Elizabeth Irvin
Senior Consultant III
Jenelle Mountain‐Castro
Associate Consultant II TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 159.94 $ 216.06 $ 110.80 $ 103.88 $ 141.50 $ 155.82 $ 130.53 161.89% 10.00% ICF JONES & STOKES, INC.
20 118 140 46 10 28 12 374 19,553.00 $ 714.52 $ 32,811.09 $ 5,307.86 $ 290.00 $ 58,676.47 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
24 30 54 2,953.80 $ 107.94 $ 4,956.65 $ 801.84 $ 290.00 $ 9,110.23 $ 20 94 110 46 10 28 12 320 16,599.20 $ 606.58 $ 27,854.44 $ 4,506.02 $ 49,566.24 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 32 158 200 66 14 32 14 516
$ 34,137.37 5,118.13 $ 22,159.04 $ 6,856.17 $ 1,981.06 $ 4,986.30 $ 1,827.40 $ 26,751.50 $ 977.57 $ 44,890.59 $ 7,261.97 $ 290.00 $ $ 80,171.63

0.12% 0.82% 0.53% 0.16% 0.05% 0.12% 0.04%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Principal Landscape Arch
Senior Landscape Architect
Irrigation Specialist
Senior Landscape Designer
Landscape Designer
Project Accountant TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 244.65 $ 165.50 $ 143.92 $ 126.47 $ 86.81 $ 115.13 164.20% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
36 55 93 272 198 41 695 30,143.50 $ $ 409.65 $ 50,168.27 $ 8,072.14 $ 88,793.55 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Principal Landscape Arch
Senior Landscape Architect
Irrigation Specialist
Senior Landscape Designer
Landscape Designer
Project Accountant TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 244.65 $ 165.50 $ 143.92 $ 126.47 $ 86.81 $ 115.13 164.20% 10.00% MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
36 55 93 272 198 41 695 30,143.50 $ 409.65 $ 50,168.27 $ 8,072.14 $ 88,793.55 $ 36 55 93 272 198 41 695 30,143.50 $ 409.65 $ 50,168.27 $ 8,072.14 $ 88,793.55 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Principal Landscape Arch
Senior Landscape Architect
Irrigation Specialist
Senior Landscape Designer
Landscape Designer
Project Accountant TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 244.65 $ 165.50 $ 143.92 $ 126.47 $ 86.81 $ 115.13 164.20% 10.00% MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
36 55 93 272 198 41 695
$ 9,102.74 8,807.38 $ 13,384.75 $ 34,400.00 $ 17,188.02 $ 4,720.15 $ 30,143.50 $ 409.65 $ 50,168.27 $ 8,072.14 $ $ 88,793.55

0.21% 0.22% 0.32% 0.83% 0.41% 0.11%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION

PEN (ELEC)
EN5 (ELEC)
DE5 (ELEC)
EN3 (PLUMB)
D3 (PLUMB)
DE5 (FP)
DE3 (FP)
EN5 (MECH)
DE3 (MECH)
CAD/BIM4 TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 496.92 $ 288.39 $ 235.08 $ 251.30 $ 161.80 $ 212.16 $ 149.32 $ 286.57 $ 161.80 $ 127.27 194.77% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
5 111 252 16 103 13 41 19 39 70 669 44,399.75 $ $ 603.39 $ 87,654.74 $ 13,265.79 $ 145,923.67 $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
8 41 7 56 3,958.77 $ 53.80 $ 7,815.47 $ 1,182.80 $ 13,010.84 $ 22 4 322.88 $ 4.39 $ 637.44 $ 96.47 $ 1,061.17 $ 11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $ 2 16 4 22 1,494.88 $ 20.32 $ 2,951.22 $ 446.64 $ 4,913.05 $ 1 12 2 15 1,037.44 $ 14.10 $ 2,048.13 $ 309.97 $ 3,409.64 $ 18 1 10 708.19 $ 9.62 $ 1,398.12 $ 211.59 $ 2,327.53 $
12 3 233.94 $ 3.18 $ 461.85 $ 69.90 $ 768.86 $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
1 12 7 7 27 2,002.78 $ 27.22 $ 3,953.92 $ 598.39 $ 6,582.31 $ 11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $
16 2 4 13 988.89 $ 13.44 $ 1,952.28 $ 295.46 $ 3,250.07 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
22 2 6 401.38 $ 5.45 $ 792.41 $ 119.92 $ 1,319.17 $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $
21 1 4 289.63 $ 3.94 $ 571.79 $ 86.54 $ 951.89 $ 11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $ 1 6 29 12 48 3,260.39 $ 44.31 $ 6,436.72 $ 974.14 $ 10,715.56 $ 12 3 233.94 $ 3.18 $ 461.85 $ 69.90 $ 768.86 $
11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $
1 3 24 12 40 2,631.07 $ 35.76 $ 5,194.30 $ 786.11 $ 8,647.24 $ 1 1 10 6 18 1,202.69 $ 16.34 $ 2,374.37 $ 359.34 $ 3,952.75 $ 18 4 13 825.94 $ 11.22 $ 1,630.58 $ 246.77 $ 2,714.52 $ 16 2 9 602.44 $ 8.19 $ 1,189.35 $ 180.00 $ 1,979.97 $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
12 3 233.94 $ 3.18 $ 461.85 $ 69.90 $ 768.86 $
P2S, INC.

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

PEN (ELEC)
EN5 (ELEC)
DE5 (ELEC)
EN3 (PLUMB)
D3 (PLUMB)
DE5 (FP)
DE3 (FP)
EN5 (MECH)
DE3 (MECH)
CAD/BIM4 TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 496.92 $ 288.39 $ 235.08 $ 251.30 $ 161.80 $ 212.16 $ 149.32 $ 286.57 $ 161.80 $ 127.27 194.77% 10.00% P2S, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
1 29 34 6 28 10 108 7,452.21 $ 101.28 $ 14,712.28 $ 2,226.58 $ 24,492.34 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
1 212 6 411.24 $ 5.59 $ 811.88 $ 122.87 $ 1,351.58 $
1 12 12 1 16 4 46 3,123.43 $ 42.45 $ 6,166.33 $ 933.22 $ 10,265.43 $ 8 10 1 2 4 25 1,770.82 $ 24.07 $ 3,495.98 $ 529.09 $ 5,819.96 $ 6 6 1 2 2 17 1,224.44 $ 16.64 $ 2,417.31 $ 365.84 $ 4,024.23 $ 1 214 8 511.04 $ 6.95 $ 1,008.90 $ 152.69 $ 1,679.58 $
1 212 6 411.24 $ 5.59 $ 811.88 $ 122.87 $ 1,351.58 $
1 37 64 7 65 13 41 16 29 20 293 18,254.85 $ 248.08 $ 36,039.03 $ 5,454.20 $ 59,996.16 $ 1 8 18 1 24 2 10 4 8 8 84 5,102.95 $ 69.35 $ 10,074.33 $ 1,524.66 $ 16,771.29 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
2 2 1 3 2 8 4 4 26 $ 21.78 1,602.46 $ 3,163.60 $ 478.78 $ 5,266.63 $ 16 32 2 20 4 12 4 12 8 110 6,976.68 $ 94.81 $ 13,773.48 $ 2,084.50 $ 22,929.47 $ 8 8 1 10 2 4 2 2 4 41 $ 35.56 2,616.64 $ 5,165.81 $ 781.80 $ 8,599.82 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
1 2 1 4 2 6 1 2 19 $ 15.04 1,106.38 $ 2,184.23 $ 330.56 $ 3,636.21 $ 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 13 $ 11.55 849.74 $ 1,677.57 $ 253.89 $ 2,792.74 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK

PEN (ELEC)
EN5 (ELEC)
DE5 (ELEC)
EN3 (PLUMB)
D3 (PLUMB)
DE5 (FP)
DE3 (FP)
EN5 (MECH)
DE3 (MECH)
CAD/BIM4 TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 496.92 $ 288.39 $ 235.08 $ 251.30 $ 161.80 $ 212.16 $ 149.32 $ 286.57 $ 161.80 $ 127.27 194.77% 10.00% P2S, INC.
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
9 34 3 10 3 10 7 76 5,035.85 $ 68.44 $ 9,941.86 $ 1,504.61 $ 16,550.76 $ 3 6 2 2 13 901.42 $ 12.25 $ 1,779.60 $ 269.33 $ 2,962.60 $ 2 12 1 4 1 4 4 28 1,769.96 $ 24.05 $ 3,494.28 $ 528.83 $ 5,817.13 $ 2 10 1 2 1 2 2 20 1,346.86 $ 18.30 $ 2,658.99 $ 402.42 $ 4,426.57 $ 2 6 1 2 1 2 1 15 1,017.61 $ 13.83 $ 2,008.98 $ 304.04 $ 3,344.46 $ 1 10 43 7 61 4,434.90 $ 60.27 $ 8,755.45 $ 1,325.06 $ 14,575.69 $ 22 4 322.88 $ 4.39 $ 637.44 $ 96.47 $ 1,061.17 $
1 2 18 4 25 1,793.13 $ 24.37 $ 3,540.03 $ 535.75 $ 5,893.28 $ 2 12 2 16 1,126.38 $ 15.31 $ 2,223.72 $ 336.54 $ 3,701.95 $ 28 1 11 797.13 $ 10.83 $ 1,573.71 $ 238.17 $ 2,619.84 $ 11 2 161.44 $ 2.19 $ 318.72 $ 48.24 $ 530.59 $ 12 3 233.94 $ 3.18 $ 461.85 $ 69.90 $ 768.86 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
4 4 2 4 8 4 4 30 2,034.32 $ $ 27.65 $ 4,016.19 $ 607.82 $ 6,685.97 $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
4 4 2 4 8 4 4 30 2,034.32 $ 27.65 $ 4,016.19 $ 607.82 $ 6,685.97 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
1 8 8 6 6 2 2 2 35 2,595.29 $ $ 35.27 $ 5,123.67 $ 775.42 $ 8,529.65 $ - - $ - $ - $
1 8 8 6 6 2 2 2 35 2,595.29 $ 35.27 $ 5,123.67 $ 775.42 $ 8,529.65 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
40 30 8 36 8 10 4 8 2 146 9,964.16 $ $ 135.41 $ 19,671.41 $ 2,977.10 $ 32,748.08 $ - - $ - $ - $
40 30 8 36 8 10 4 8 2 146 9,964.16 $ 135.41 $ 19,671.41 $ 2,977.10 $ 32,748.08 $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
6 163 294 32 149 31 51 29 47 78 880
$ 47,007.55 2,981.50 $ 69,114.34 $ 8,041.45 $ 24,108.47 $ 6,576.90 $ 7,615.22 $ 8,310.65 $ 7,604.68 $ 9,926.98 $ 58,993.52 $ 801.72 $ 116,466.00 $ 17,626.12 $ $ 193,887.37

0.07% 1.13% 1.66% 0.19% 0.58% 0.16% 0.18% 0.20% 0.18% 0.24%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Andrew Fiscus, PE
Resident Engineer/Structures
Representative
Construction Engineer
Construction Inspector TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 205.70 $ 129.66 $ 168.56 135.75% 10.00%
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 180 80 80 340 23,477.60 $ $ 352.16 $ 32,348.90 $ 5,617.87 $ 61,796.54 180 80 80 340 23,477.60 $ 352.16 $ 32,348.90 $ 5,617.87 $ 61,796.54 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
180 80 80 340 23,477.60 $ 352.16 $ 32,348.90 $ 5,617.87 $ 61,796.54 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

UNICO ENGINEERING (DBE)

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Andrew Fiscus, PE
Resident Engineer/Structures
Representative
Construction Engineer
Construction Inspector TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 205.70 $ 129.66 $ 168.56 135.75% 10.00%

UNICO ENGINEERING (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Andrew Fiscus, PE
Resident Engineer/Structures
Representative
Construction Engineer
Construction Inspector TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 205.70 $ 129.66 $ 168.56 135.75% 10.00%

UNICO ENGINEERING (DBE)
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 180 80 80 340
$ 10,373.00 37,025.39 $ 13,484.90 $ 23,477.60 $ 352.16 $ 32,348.90 $ 5,617.87 $ $ 61,796.54

0.89% 0.25% 0.32%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Principal/ QA Review
Project Manager
Coastal Scientist
Project Engineer

CADD/GIS
AdminTOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 310.18 $ 245.14 $ 123.74 $ 141.46 $ 104.62 $ 126.22 182.63% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ GHD

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Principal/ QA Review
Project Manager
Coastal Scientist
Project Engineer

CADD/GIS
AdminTOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 310.18 $ 245.14 $ 123.74 $ 141.46 $ 104.62 $ 126.22 182.63% 10.00% GHD
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Principal/ QA Review
Project Manager
Coastal Scientist
Project Engineer

CADD/GIS
AdminTOTAL HOURS LABOR COST ESCALATION OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 310.18 $ 245.14 $ 123.74 $ 141.46 $ 104.62 $ 126.22 182.63% 10.00% GHD
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
20 64 140 60 40 20 344 17,501.80 $ $ 131.26 $ 32,203.26 $ 4,983.63 $ 54,819.96 $ - - $ - $ - $
20 64 140 60 40 20 344 17,501.80 $ 131.26 $ 32,203.26 $ 4,983.63 $ 54,819.96 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 20 64 140 60 40 20 344
$ 15,688.90 6,203.56 $ 17,322.96 $ 8,487.38 $ 4,184.62 $ 2,524.45 $ 17,501.80 $ 131.26 $ 32,203.26 $ 4,983.63 $ $ 54,819.96

0.15% 0.38% 0.42% 0.20% 0.10% 0.06%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Mark Ramsey
Chris Hicks
Nan Hua
Sam Lo Grasso
Aliz Horvath TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 429.59 $ 270.36 $ 143.58 $ 322.36 $ 135.19 176.31% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 8 60 200 32 160 460 26,426.44 $ $ 46,592.46 $ 7,301.89 $ 80,320.79 $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 8 60 200 32 160 460 26,426.44 $ 46,592.46 $ 7,301.89 $ 80,320.79 $ 8 60 200 32 160 460 26,426.44 $ 46,592.46 $ 7,301.89 $ 80,320.79 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

MOTT MACDONALD

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Mark Ramsey
Chris Hicks
Nan Hua
Sam Lo Grasso
Aliz Horvath TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 429.59 $ 270.36 $ 143.58 $ 322.36 $ 135.19 176.31% 10.00%

MOTT MACDONALD
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Mark Ramsey
Chris Hicks
Nan Hua
Sam Lo Grasso
Aliz Horvath TOTAL HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE TOTAL COST $ 429.59 $ 270.36 $ 143.58 $ 322.36 $ 135.19 176.31% 10.00%

MOTT MACDONALD
$ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 8 60 200 32 160 460
$ 16,221.33 3,436.72 $ 28,716.34 $ 10,315.51 $ 21,630.88 $ 26,426.44 $ 46,592.46 $ 7,301.89 $ $ 80,320.79

0.08% 0.39% 0.69% 0.25% 0.52%

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

1. Project Management
A. AdministrationB. Project ScheduleC. Manage SubconsultantsD. Meetings, design schedule, budgetE. Quality Assurance/Quality ControlF. Design Coordination

2. Design Services
A. Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS&E) Phase: 65%, 95%, 100% Submittals i. PS&E submittalsii. Track and respond to commentsiii. Resubmit PS&Eiv. Constructability Review B. Assemble SpecificationsC. Assemble Cost EstimateD. Construction Working Day Schedule, RE FileE. Surveying & MappingF. Bridge Design and Detailing i. Superstructure design - design & Qsv. Assemble design & check calculations - checkvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, cost estimateviii. Demolition drawings/specificationsix. Staging plansx. Design of temporary pedestrian bridgexi. Design of temporary vehicular ramp G. Ground supported curtain wall under bridge near pier i. Wall Designii. Wall Design Check
H. Pier Sign
i. Field visitii. Prepare Pier Sign Protection Planiii. Structural analysis and design of frameiv. Provide new power sourcev. Assemble design & check calculationsvi. Prepare special provisionsvii. Quantity design & check estimate, submit cost estimateviii. Develop neon sign restoration plan I. Roadway Design
i. Colorado Avenue from Ocean to Pier Deck (added bollards)ii. Temporary Lot 1 North Entranceiii. Lot 1 North Improvements

1. Lot 1 North Design2. Civil design east and west sides of Ocean Front Walk3. Civil design of Ocean Front Walk iv. ADA Improvementsv. Final Signing/Striping plansvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate

TASK DESCRIPTION
Steffen Turoff
Principal in Charge
Daniel Garcia
Walker Project Manager
Tania Schleck
TDM
Ellen Schwartz
Parking Planner
Kevin Waters
Parking Design
Efrain Gonzalez
Senior Technician
Jeff Weckstein
Traffic and Parking
Chrissy Nichols
Director Multi‐Modal
TOTAL

HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 167.48 $ 111.65 $ 111.65 $ 89.32 $ 129.51 $ 84.85 $ 133.98 $ 156.31 103.00% 10.00% $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,386 31,458.07 $ $ 522,929.65 $ - - $ - $ - $ 76 21,031.94 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 34 8,803.37 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 488 110,928.45 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 316 71,797.02 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 140 47,171.63 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,332 $31,458.07 263,197.24 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 15,743 137,901.25 $ $ 2,754,049.25 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 684 129,047.66 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 74 12,495.98 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 138 25,779.15 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 60 10,768.35 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 412 80,004.18 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 208 46,534.66 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 30 6,519.90 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 84 19,926.26 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 266 $6,156.25 56,137.80 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,050 $500.00 754,576.77 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,462 269,593.76 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 596 109,361.85 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 32 7,551.06 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 49 9,881.46 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 490 93,846.50 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 195 41,534.77 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 844 154,967.23 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 382 $500.00 67,840.13 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 8 2,283.47 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 4 1,141.73 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 4 1,141.73 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 489 $500.00 94,419.46 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 22 $500.00 5,861.92 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 217 38,157.61 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 160 30,105.72 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 8 1,682.55 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 16 3,278.15 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 42 10,521.98 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 14 2,910.87 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 10 1,900.67 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,168 306,070.06 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 268 45,984.52 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 349 47,687.19 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 556 78,827.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 190 27,346.27 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 185 26,108.05 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 181 25,373.50 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 415 54,728.11 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 357 47,607.29 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 223 31,235.13 $

WALKER CONSULTANTS
GRAND
TOTAL
HOURS

GRAND TOTAL

OTHER DIRECT
COSTS

GRAND TOTAL
COST

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
J. Traffic Management & Staging Plans
i. Staging plans for temporary pedestrian bridgeii. Staging plans/temporary striping for Lot 1 Northiii. Staging plans for temporary rampiv. Temporary striping for Palisades beach Road/Appian Wayv. Temporary striping & signing on the Pier deckvi. Traffic detour for PCH/Palisades Beach Road exitvii. Traffic detour for Appian Way and Moomat Ahiko Way East & Westviii. Pedestrian/Bike detoursix. Pedestrian/Bike detour for Marvin Braude Bike Trailx. Special Provisionsxi. Quantity & Cost Estimate K. Drainage Design, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) BMPs i. General site drainage analysisii. Drainage design for bridgeiii. Stormwater BMP designiv. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionv. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) if needed by California Coastal Commissionvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate L. Geotechnical Recommendations
i. Foundation Report and Geotech Design Reportii. Pavement recommendationsiii. Miscellaneous Items M. Landscape Design
i. Plans for landscape reconstruction ii. Perform existing tree surveyiii. Special provisionsiv. Quantity & Cost estimate N. Utility Coordination & Design
i. Utility coordinationii. Collect and map as-built data provided by City and utility companiesiii. Locate Utilities / BIMiv. Maintain/update utility base mapv. Design utility relocationsvi. Special Provisionsvii. Quantity & Cost Estimate O. Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Design (MEP & FP) i. Design MEP & FP under pier ii. Review available as-built dataiii. Perform site visit, inspection, and mapping of MEP & FPiv. Work with City on utilities relocationsv. Prepare relocation plansvi. Repair MEP & FP connecting to aquariumvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate P. Pier Widening & Modification
i. Site visit to Pier and review as-built dataii. Prepare design and plansiii. Evaluate existing pier deck at aquariumiv. Pier deck reconstruction and Aquarium roofv. Evaluate existing pier deck at temp rampvii. Special Provisionsviii. Quantity & Cost Estimate Steffen Turoff
Principal in Charge
Daniel Garcia
Walker Project Manager
Tania Schleck
TDM
Ellen Schwartz
Parking Planner
Kevin Waters
Parking Design
Efrain Gonzalez
Senior Technician
Jeff Weckstein
Traffic and Parking
Chrissy Nichols
Director Multi‐Modal
TOTAL

HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 167.48 $ 111.65 $ 111.65 $ 89.32 $ 129.51 $ 84.85 $ 133.98 $ 156.31 103.00% 10.00%

WALKER CONSULTANTS
GRAND
TOTAL
HOURS

GRAND TOTAL

OTHER DIRECT
COSTS

GRAND TOTAL
COST
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,074 149,801.48 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 104 15,022.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 104 15,022.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 96 13,340.26 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 94 12,973.70 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 166 22,017.43 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 92 12,402.83 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 92 12,402.83 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 96 13,244.11 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 92 12,402.83 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 20 4,092.21 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 118 16,879.63 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 609 84,812.79 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 214 29,006.05 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 86 12,294.67 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 73 10,002.19 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 103 14,103.42 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 51 7,316.11 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 32 4,969.55 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 50 7,120.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,320 $118,750.00 316,132.21 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,320 $118,750.00 316,132.21 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 785 101,442.76 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 705 90,746.52 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 80 10,696.24 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 918 155,083.54 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 180 28,513.30 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 46 6,885.98 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 272 52,606.62 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 192 27,167.37 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 45 9,612.72 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 60 11,985.23 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 123 18,312.33 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 351 71,954.32 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 88 17,612.57 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 2 420.64 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 30 6,107.90 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 142 29,419.32 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 45 9,441.09 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 4 841.28 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 23 4,477.49 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 17 3,634.02 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,416 $1,500.00 236,499.99 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 12 2,920.43 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 480 96,266.18 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 816 $1,500.00 115,896.86 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 40 8,532.96 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 68 12,883.56 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $

DocuSign Envelope ID: D51AE41B-B585-40EB-9DCB-48445D031CAA 4.A.j Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Dokken Engineering CT11361 (CCS) (7056 : Award Bid SP2060-CT and RFP SP2060-CM and Contracts for the Pier Bridge COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK
CITY OF SANTA MONICA | PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT ‐ DESIGN SERVICES June 26, 2023

FULLY BURDENED RATE

TASK DESCRIPTION
Q. Historic Architect/Preservation Specialist
i. NEPA Certified Professional/Architectii. Attend meetings iii. Perform design reviewsiv. Adjacent structure monitoring plan R. Miscellaneous Facility Relocations
i. Work with City on temporary and permanent relocation of Trash Compactorii. Removal/demolition of existing temporary officeiii. Removal of existing debris under bridgeiv. Reconstructed stairs & retaining wall S. Lighting & Electrical Design
i. Design lighting/electrical for bridge Ocean Avenueii. Design lighting/electrical on pier deck and pier edgeiii. Coordinate with SCE for electrical supplyiv. Design electrical for pier signv. Special Provisionsvi. Quantity & Cost Estimate T. Hazardous Waste
i. Hazardous Waste Sampling and Analysis Planii. Aerial Deposited Lead Surveyiii. Other environmental services

3. Permit Assistance
A. Prepare Caltrans encroachment permitB. Prepare submittal for Coastal Commission PermitC. Prepare submittal for State Lands CommissionD. Prepare submittal for State Department of Parks & RecreationE. Support for other permits and approvals as needed

4. Funding Assistance
A. Provide information for HBP documentation

5. Public Outreach
A. Public Outreach PlanB. Stakeholder DatabaseC. Collateral MaterialD. Photography/VideographyE. Website/Social MediaF. Community Meetings/Outreach EventsG. Attend Meetings/PresentationsH. WayfindingI. Groundbreaking and Ribbon Cutting Ceremonies

6. Bidding Support
A. Attend meetingsB. Respond to bidder inquiriesC. Prepare bid addendaD. Review bid results

7. Construction Support
A. Prepare ancillary environmental documents as requiredB. Engineering support during constructionC. Prepare Record DrawingsD. Project Closeout

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST

PERCENTAGE OF SCOPE OF WORK
Steffen Turoff
Principal in Charge
Daniel Garcia
Walker Project Manager
Tania Schleck
TDM
Ellen Schwartz
Parking Planner
Kevin Waters
Parking Design
Efrain Gonzalez
Senior Technician
Jeff Weckstein
Traffic and Parking
Chrissy Nichols
Director Multi‐Modal
TOTAL

HOURS LABOR COST OH RATE FEE OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST $ 167.48 $ 111.65 $ 111.65 $ 89.32 $ 129.51 $ 84.85 $ 133.98 $ 156.31 103.00% 10.00%

WALKER CONSULTANTS
GRAND
TOTAL
HOURS

GRAND TOTAL

OTHER DIRECT
COSTS

GRAND TOTAL
COST
$ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 456 $290.00 76,890.12 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 56 $290.00 9,681.10 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 324 50,599.81 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 76 16,609.22 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 200 36,140.51 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 17 3,803.87 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 28 5,817.13 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 20 4,426.57 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 135 22,092.93 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 409 68,153.05 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 124 18,607.82 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 145 23,439.92 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 48 9,278.41 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 31 6,057.06 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 26 5,193.67 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 35 5,576.16 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 218 $10,205.00 41,622.44 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 146 $10,205.00 32,103.99 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 72 9,518.45 $ 93 180 130 157 36 43 33 37 709 37,047.00 $ $ 38,158.41 $ 7,520.54 $ 9,613.02 $ 92,338.97 1,088 9,753.65 $ $ 268,456.50 $ - - $ - $ - $ 48 9,704.74 $
93 180 130 157 36 43 33 37 709 37,047.00 $ 38,158.41 $ 7,520.54 $ 9,613.02 $ 92,338.97 $ 914 $9,753.65 233,046.91 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 36 7,180.90 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 36 7,180.90 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 54 11,343.04 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 88 $ ‐ $ 19,733.97 $ - - $ - $ - $ 88 19,733.97 $
$ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 1,644 28,950.00 $ $ 222,202.18 $ - - $ - $ - $ 274 $10,000.00 49,579.38 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 45 3,816.69 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 235 $8,000.00 38,861.32 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 110 $5,000.00 18,753.01 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 185 $300.00 20,521.97 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 300 $3,000.00 29,652.11 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 155 $650.00 16,020.25 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 130 13,610.69 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 210 $2,000.00 31,386.77 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 187 $ ‐ $ 39,049.99 $ - - $ - $ - $ 30 6,279.54 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 101 21,437.25 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 46 8,863.46 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 10 2,469.75 $ $ ‐ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 1,762 $ ‐ $ 331,978.47 $ - - $ - $ - $ 476 80,426.13 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 1,134 224,162.75 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 100 15,551.62 $ $ - - $ - $ - $ 52 11,837.98 $ 93 180 130 157 36 43 33 37 709 22,898
$ 20,097.00 15,575.18 $ 14,514.50 $ 14,023.24 $ 4,662.50 $ 3,648.72 $ 4,421.34 $ 5,783.47 $ 37,047.00 $ 38,158.41 $ 7,520.54 $ 9,613.02 $ $ 92,338.97 $ 208,062.97 $ 4,158,400.00

0.37% 0.48% 0.35% 0.34% 0.11% 0.09% 0.11% 0.14%