Santa Monica City Council
January 13, 2026

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city and not rushing into over development plans that will negatively impact the community.

Sincerely,
Becky Turk
2510 26th Street
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
27 David Yakobson
From: Jeanne Laurie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 10:42 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance— SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Jeanne Laurie
Sunset Park
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
28 David Yakobson
From: Jenny Blum <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 10:46 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city. You all have gone too far too fast. And if you don't clean up downtown and revitalize our city, no one will want to live here and you all will be out of a job. Don't ruin our town.

We voted you in, so, don't disappoint us. Developers don't give a crap about our community. Residents do.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Blum
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
29 David Yakobson
From: MIke Choe <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 10:55 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DO NOT EXCEED STATE LAW Importance: High

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
My wife and I are deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We should NOT be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change is rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.  We do NOT need to go to three stories.
 We do NOT need to increase FAR to 1.5.
 We do NOT need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Michael Choe
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
30 David Yakobson
From: Allison Greene <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:20 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Allison Greene
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
31 David Yakobson
From: John Reynolds <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:42 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Oliver Chi
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members, I’ve been attending City Council meetings for 20 years and I’ve never felt like the Council is so out of touch with residents as I do now. Living in Sunset Park for 25 years, I chose this neighborhood for its beautiful parks, friendly small-town feel, and charming tree-lined streets. I’ve watched our community thrive because of smart, engaged citizens who prioritize sustainability and livability. The proposed zoning ordinance is alarming. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law, and allowing three-story developments in neighborhoods like ours isn’t necessary. This rushed process is not typical for such significant changes, and it feels like residents have been sidelined. We deserve a chance for meaningful input on how our neighborhoods are shaped. Increased density does not automatically translate to affordability, and we can’t overlook the implications this will have on safety, evacuation capacities, and infrastructure demands. This isn’t what Santa Monicans voted for when they supported this Council. I urge you to roll back this unneeded ordinance before it goes any further. Let’s preserve the integrity of our beautiful community. Please listen to the voices of the people you represent—our homes and neighborhoods depend on it.

John Reynolds
3217 17th street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
32 David Yakobson
From: Tom Richards <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:22 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Thomas Richards
Resident,
2913 10th st, Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
33 David Yakobson
From: Wendy Dembo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:58 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
As a longtime resident of the Wilmont neighborhood, I’ve grown to love the walkable community I call home. I chose to move to Santa Monica for the schools and to be close to my family in the Pacific Palisades.

I could move now, but I love being able to walk everywhere and the livable scale of the City.

The proposed zoning ordinance changes threaten this quality of life.

Allowing new housing projects to rise to three stories and exceed current floor area limits by 50% feels extreme and unnecessary. I’m deeply concerned that this rushed process undermines the essential community input that residents deserve. It’s not just about increasing density; it’s about understanding the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and local infrastructure.

Density does not equate to affordability, and the changes being proposed go beyond what our community voted for when we elected you. I urge you to roll back this unnecessary ordinance and halt its progression to the Planning Commission. We must prioritize thoughtful planning that reflects the needs and desires of Santa Monica residents.

Thank you for considering my perspective. Let’s work together to preserve the character and livability of our beloved city.

With hope,
Wendy Dembo
Santa Monica resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
34 David Yakobson
From: Julia Nicholls <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:58 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance— SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Julia Nicholls
Resident of Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
35 David Yakobson
From: Brandy Cohen-Brown <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:58 AM
To: Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Oliver Chi; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: Jacob Wasserman; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Nina Fresco; Peer Chacko; Shawn Landres
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
As a 22-year resident of Sunset Park, I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could drastically alter the character of our beloved community. The idea that we can build three-story housing developments and increase floor area limits by 50% is alarming and unnecessary. This change goes well beyond what state law, SB1123, allows, and it feels like a rushed decision that doesn’t respect the voices of those of us who call Santa Monica home.

I chose Sunset Park for the public school system, its coastal access and strong sense of community, values that I fear will be lost if this ordinance passes. Adding density does not equate to affordability; it risks overwhelming our neighborhoods, safety, and infrastructure without proper consideration of evacuation capacity and emergency response. This is not what we voted for when we elected you.

I urge you to roll back this unneeded ordinance and allow for a more thoughtful process that includes genuine input from the community. We cannot afford to make irreversible decisions on a whim.

Thank you so much for taking the time to consider the opinions of locals.

Respectfully,
Brandy Cohen-Brown
--
***PLEASE NOTE THAT I WILL BE OUT OF THE OFFICE FROM NOV 9-NOV 17, 2024. Please send all prescription requests prior to November 9.

Brandy Cohen-Brown, D.O.

Oceanside Mental Health
Psychiatrist/License 20A9796
701 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 230
Santa Monica, California 90401
www.brandycohenbrown.com
[email protected]
Phone/Text: 424-259-1701
Fax: 310-496-1449
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
36 David Yakobson
From: Hal Jaffe <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:00 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance— SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,

HAROLD JAFFE
2626 34TH ST
SANTA MONICA CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
37 David Yakobson
From: TAMRA RAVEN <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:05 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Tamra
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
38 David Yakobson
From: pierre-yves delaunay <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:08 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance— SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Pierre-Yves Delaunay
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
39 David Yakobson
From: John Greene <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:32 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
John Greene
2211 Pier Ave.

Santa Monica, CA 90405
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
40 David Yakobson
From: ALAN MONT <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:44 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in NOMA for 16 years, and I chose this beautiful beach community for its excellent weather, vibrant local businesses, and the close-knit community that truly looks out for each other. However, I’m extremely frustrated with the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to change everything we love about Santa Monica.

Rushing through a zoning change that allows three-story buildings in neighborhoods like ours and increases density beyond what our state laws require is unacceptable. Density does not equal affordability; we shouldn’t be pursuing this path without a clear understanding of how it will impact our safety, evacuation capacity, and aging infrastructure. This isn't what we voted for when electing this council.

I am not leaving, but many are because of over-building, feeling unsafe, and good businesses leaving. We need to pause this process, listen to the community, and reconsider these drastic changes. Please do not send this unnecessary ordinance forward. It’s vital that you prioritize the voices of your constituents before making irreversible decisions about our homes and neighborhoods.

We deserve better. Let’s work together to protect the Santa Monica we love.

Thank you,
Alan Mont/Resident
818-261-8172
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
41 David Yakobson
From: Maureen Jennings <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:50 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Maureen Jennings
1824 Euclid Street #3
Santa Monica CA 90404
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
42 David Yakobson
From: Alan Levenson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:59 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for over 30 years, drawn to its quiet charm and friendly community. As I watch the proposed zoning ordinance unfold, I’m deeply concerned about its potential to irrevocably change the very fabric of our neighborhoods. Allowing three-story buildings with increased density and smaller setbacks in areas like Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood is not what we voted for when we elected this council.

This ordinance pushes far beyond the limits set by state law and is being pushed through in an unusually rushed manner, which is simply unacceptable. The complexities of density cannot be overlooked; it does not automatically equate to affordability, and such drastic changes must not be made without fully understanding the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands.

The rushed process has stripped citizens of meaningful input, and I urge you to consider the long-term consequences of these actions. Please do the right thing and don’t waste money on legal fees by allowing this ordinance to move forward.

Let’s work together to ensure that Santa Monica remains the wonderful place we all cherish. I ask that you roll back this unnecessary zoning ordinance and engage the community in a more thoughtful manner.

Alan Levenson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
43 David Yakobson
From: Dirk van de Bunt <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:07 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11C and Integrity

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I am writing to express my serious concern regarding Agenda Item 11C and the integrity of recent housing votes involving Councilmember Jesse Zwick.

The FPPC has confirmed that Councilmember Zwick had a disqualifying conflict of interest when he proposed, motioned, and seconded items while legally barred from doing so. Simply ratifying these votes after the fact does not resolve the issue; it risks treating a serious breach of public trust as a mere technicality.

I am asking the Council to take the following meaningful corrective actions:
- Declare the conflict-tainted votes null and void.
- Allow these items to return only if a councilmember without a conflict chooses to bring them forward. - Require entirely new motions, seconds, and votes through a transparent process.

This is not a matter of housing policy, but of ensuring that Council decisions are viewed by residents as lawful and ethical. We deserve a process conducted with full integrity.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Dirk van de Bunt
1624 Hill St
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Matias Fuchs-Lynch <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 12:56 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Items 10.A and 11.C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Council,
I support housing, and I support the Council members who are taking action to deliver it.

I am writing to express my support for Agenda Items 10.A and 11.C and for the Council’s continued efforts to make it easier to build all kinds of housing in Santa Monica. Removing barriers to housing production is essential if our city is to meet unmet demand, welcome new neighbors, and revitalize the local economy for the future.

Thank you for your leadership and commitment to Santa Monica’s long-term success.

Sincerely,
Mati Fuchs-Lynch
Santa Monica resident and soon to be voter
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: John Lin <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 4:54 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Items 10.A and 11.C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Council,
I support housing, and I support the Council members who are taking action to deliver it.

I am writing to express my support for Agenda Items 10.A and 11.C and for the Council’s continued efforts to make it easier to build all kinds of housing in Santa Monica. Removing barriers to housing production is essential if our city is to meet unmet demand, welcome new neighbors, and revitalize the local economy for the future.

Thank you for your leadership and commitment to Santa Monica’s long-term success.

I hope it's not considered an indirect nexus of benefit when you represent me, a housed resident who has and will vote, on housing issues.

Sincerely,
John Lin
Santa Monica Resident, Voter, worker
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 David Yakobson
From: JOHN PRINDLE <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 5:03 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Items 10.A and 11.C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Council,
I support housing, and I support the Council members who are taking action to deliver it.

I am writing to express my support for Agenda Items 10.A and 11.C and for the Council’s continued efforts to make it easier to build all kinds of housing in Santa Monica. Removing barriers to housing production is essential if our city is to meet unmet demand, welcome new neighbors, and revitalize the local economy for the future.

Thank you for your leadership and commitment to Santa Monica’s long-term success.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Santa Monica Resident / Voter]
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 David Yakobson
From: Soon Chung <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 7:58 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 David Yakobson
From: Euclid Management <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 7:59 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 David Yakobson
From: Stephanie Seaholm <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 7:59 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Stephanie Seaholm
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 David Yakobson
From: Soon Chung <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 7:59 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 David Yakobson
From: SOON CHUNG <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 8:00 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 David Yakobson
From: Ann Maggio <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 8:07 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
The Thanawalla Family
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
10 David Yakobson
From: Mathew Millen <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 8:25 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
11 Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
12 David Yakobson
From: Luke Cain <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 8:38 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Kind regards,
Luke
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
13 David Yakobson
From: Giacomo Valentini <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 8:35 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; Santa Monica Neighbors
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Giacomo
phone/WhatsApp +1-424-355-4853
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
14 David Yakobson
From: Max Cain <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 8:42 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
15 David Yakobson
From: Giacomo Valentini <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 8:44 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; Santa Monica Neighbors
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Giacomo Valentini
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
16 David Yakobson
From: Clara Seneca <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 8:45 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Clara Seneca
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
17 David Yakobson
From: Mark Galanty <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 9:40 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Mark Valente
Santa zmonica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
18 David Yakobson
From: Elizabeth St. Pierre <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2026 11:11 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2024 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2024, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On December 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2024 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
19 David Yakobson
From: Tatiana <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 12:43 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Thanks,
Tatiana
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
20 David Yakobson
From: JULIE MILLIGAN <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 5:41 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Julie Milligan, esq.
310 923 8692
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
21 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Ong <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 7:30 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council: We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law. On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA. On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation. I request that the Council: 1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust. Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
22 David Yakobson
From: Bill Ong <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 7:35 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
23 David Yakobson
From: Bill Ong <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 7:35 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
24 David Yakobson
From: Houman Hemmati <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 7:56 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Houman D Hemmati
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
25 David Yakobson
From: Annie Elliott <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 7:55 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law. On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA. On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation. I request that the Council: 1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust. Respectfully submitted, Annie
https://www.annieelliott.com/
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
26 David Yakobson
From: Robert Vartan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 8:55 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause

11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
27 David Yakobson
From: HANNAH MINGHELLA <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 8:47 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
28 David Yakobson
From: Ash Oelsen <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 9:35 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
CHEERS!
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
29 David Yakobson
From: Baravarian, Yas <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 9:01 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Yas Baravarian
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
30 David Yakobson
From: Flora <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 9:50 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
31 David Yakobson
From: Erik Huberman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 11:07 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Erik Huberman | CEO
1714 16th Street
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
32 hawkemedia.com
M: 805.443.3501
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
33 David Yakobson
From: Peter Alevizos <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 11:42 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

There is simply too much of a basis for significant conflict of interest here.

I am in agreement with a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
34 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 12:01 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Thanks, Spielman Family
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
35 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 12:41 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
36 David Yakobson
From: Don Mehrabi <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 12:41 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Don Mehrabi
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
37 David Yakobson
From: Gail Gordon <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 12:47 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Gail
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
38 David Yakobson
From: Melinda Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 12:55 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Charles and Melinda Smith
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
39 David Yakobson
From: Mary Beth Woods <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:06 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Mary beth woods
3104631599
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
40 David Yakobson
From: Darlene Vogel <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:07 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Darlene Vogel
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
41 David Yakobson
From: Laura Park <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:11 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Laura Park
1301 Ashland Ave
Santa Monica
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
42 David Yakobson
From: Tracey Hom <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:16 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
43 David Yakobson
From: Jennifer Lynch <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:20 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Jennifer Lynch
26 year Santa Monica resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
44 David Yakobson
From: Janet Heinzle <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:23 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Janet Heinzle
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
45 David Yakobson
From: tim joensen <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:30 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Tim Joensen
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
46 David Yakobson
From: Elizabeth Joensen <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:30 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Joensen
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
47 David Yakobson
From: Melanie Martin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:30 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council: We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law. On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA. On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation. I request that the Council: 1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust. Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
48 David Yakobson
From: Holly Silvers <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:36 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause

11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Holly Granelli
Home owner and business owner in Santa Monica Mom to two Grant Elementary students Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
49 David Yakobson
From: Yakov <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:47 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
50 David Yakobson
From: Barbara Eskowitz <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:59 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Barbara Eskowitz
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
51 David Yakobson
From: Matthew Park <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 1:13 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Matthew Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
52 David Yakobson
From: Susan Finley <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 2:17 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Susan Finley
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
53 David Yakobson
From: Patty Briggs <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 2:03 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Patty Briggs
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
54 David Yakobson
From: Robin OConnell <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 2:32 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Robin O'Connell
(310) 463-2788
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
55 David Yakobson
From: Wendy Dembo <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 3:29 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
56 David Yakobson
From: Bri Ola <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 3:29 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Brian Lasky
1612 California Ave, SM 90403
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
57 David Yakobson
From: Jim Berchtold <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 3:51 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Jim Berchtold
Sent from my iPhone
Jim Berchtold
701 Ocean Avenue PH F
SANTA MONICA CA 90402
Cell 503.310.0805
[email protected] - effective now
[email protected] - discontinuing the Comcast email 9/25/2021 Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
58 David Yakobson
From: Lauren Marie <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 3:53 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Lauren Wyka
821 Bay
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
59 David Yakobson
From: Susan Ebey <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 3:57 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
TYT Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Susan Ebey
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
60 David Yakobson
From: Christine Wang <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 4:20 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Tina Wang,
Santa Monica resident for 29 years
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
61 David Yakobson
From: Gabriel Tambone <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 4:11 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Gabriel Tambone
821 Bay Street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
62 David Yakobson
From: Chrissi Durbin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 4:26 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
C Durbin
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
63 David Yakobson
From: Peggy Jo Abraham <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 4:27 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
64 David Yakobson
From: Timothy Lewitzke <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 4:47 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Timothy L. Lewitzke
Palisades Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
65 David Yakobson
From: Karen Klein <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 4:51 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Karen Klein
Palisades Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
66 David Yakobson
From: Rachel Sene <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 5:23 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing prduction decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,

JAY JOHNSON

RACHEL SENE
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
67 David Yakobson
From: Rachel Sene <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 5:23 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; Stephanie
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
68 David Yakobson
From: Rachel Sene <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 5:24 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; Stephanie
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
69 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 5:39 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Michelle Gray
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
70 David Yakobson
From: kristin powell <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 5:47 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
71 David Yakobson
From: Stanley Weiser <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 7:25 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Stanley Weiser
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
72 David Yakobson
From: Dennis Ruben <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 8:30 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause

11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Dennis Ruben
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
73 David Yakobson
From: Rima Simon <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 8:39 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause

11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Rima Simon, MSW, LCSW
818/694-9477
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
74 David Yakobson
From: April Gaye <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 9:02 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
75 David Yakobson
From: Michael Huntsman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 9:06 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]; Michael Huntsman Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Michael Huntsman
310.948.2929
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
76 David Yakobson
From: apt <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 9:07 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Narween Otto
602 Euclid street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
77 David Yakobson
From: April Gaye <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 9:08 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
April Gaye
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
78 David Yakobson
From: Georja Umano <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 10:02 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Georja Umano
2222 6 th St
Santa Monica CA 90405
Sent with good cheer
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
79 David Yakobson
From: Susan Clark <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2026 11:59 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Susa Clark
433 Euclid Street
Santa Monica CA 90402
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
80 David Yakobson
From: Isabelle Carroll <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:49 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Isabelle Carroll
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026