Written Comments — Santa Monica City Council, January 13, 2026 (part 1 of 3)

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:04 PM
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
ar Mayor Torosis and City Councilmembers,
I to urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest.

The rezoning from R1 to Neighborhood Commercial allows large projects, including housing developments up to 85’ tall with state bonuses. The FPPC has determined that Councilmember Zwick could not legally participate in housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. Since he made the motions to approve both the rezoning on September 30, 2025 and the limited covenant on October 14, 2025, these votes are invalid under California law.

Given that this rezoning violates the City’s General Plan and environmental law, failed to follow the required procedure to change zoning, and already faces multiple lawsuits, I respectfully request that you rescind this invalid upzoning.

Sincerely,
Wilma Hall
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: Kathy Knight <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:04 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th St.

EXTERNAL
January 13, 2026
I ask you to rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th St. The FPPC found Councilmember Jesse Zwick had a disqualifying conflict due to his Housing Action Coalition employment, yet he made the motions to approve the 2644 30th St. rezoning allowing 85 foot tall housing projects.
- Kathy Knight
[email protected]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 David Yakobson
From: Gretchen Sharp <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for many years, raised here with my family, and I cherish the library system and the abundance of family-friendly activities that make our neighborhood a wonderful place to grow up.

This is why I’m deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would fundamentally alter the fabric of our community.

The idea of allowing three-story developments and significantly increased density goes far beyond what state law permits and feels like a rushed attempt to push through changes without proper citizen input.

This isn't how we should approach such impactful decisions. We can’t simply add density without thoroughly understanding the implications for safety, evacuation capacity, and the infrastructure demands it would create.

We elected you to represent our interests, and this ordinance is not what Santa Monicans voted for. I urge you to reconsider this proposal and roll it back before it goes to the Planning Commission. Our neighborhoods deserve thoughtful planning, not hasty changes that could lead to irreversible consequences.

Please listen to the voices of your constituents and halt this proposed ordinance now.

Gretchen Sharp
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 David Yakobson
From: Dayle Kerry <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:23 PM
To: barbanell; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Heidi von Tongeln; Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Subject: OPPOSITION to 11C: Ratification of Previously Discredited Votes on the January 13, 2026, Santa Monica City Council Agenda

EXTERNAL
Thank you.

Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
On Tuesday, January 13, 2026, 10:00 AM, barbanell <[email protected]> wrote:

To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Dan Hall <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Cc: Oliver Chi <[email protected]>, Heidi von Tongeln <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Nina Fresco <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
From: Jerry Bass & Stephanie Barbanell/Santa Monica
Re: Subject: OPPOSITION to 11C: Ratification of Previously Discredited Votes on the January 13, 2026, Santa Monica City Council Agenda
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
“Hard proof exists of an alignment between some of our local elected officials and the development industry.”
Specifically, there is overwhelming evidence that Councilman Zwick has a gross conflict of interest and a pro developer bias, such that ALL the decisions he was involved in, as outlined by numerous neighborhood groups, are TAINTED and must be vacated.

Santa Monica’s reputation is already tarnished by rising crime and safety issues, let’s not add CORRUPTION .

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 ZWICK’S FAILURE TO RECUSE HIMSELF, means all decisions he was involved in must be revoted upon.

Zwick must resign or be removed from office for his violation of public trust! Sincerely,
Jerry Bass & Stephanie Barbanell, Santa Monica residents since 1983 Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 David Yakobson
From: Elizabeth Lerer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:34 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: Oliver Chi; Heidi von Tongeln
Subject: OPPOSE agenda item 11. C: Ratification of Previously Discredited Votes

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
I oppose item 11.C.

You simply must start over on ALL the tainted votes!
Thank you,
Elizabeth Lerer
Concerned Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 David Yakobson
From: Ramesh Ramalingam <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:58 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Ramesh Ramalingam
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 David Yakobson
From: Ramesh Ramalingam <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:58 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

According to the Petrovich v. City of Sacramento ruling, a conflicted councilmember's participation in a quasi-judicial decision invalidates the entire decision. The City cannot simply "re-vote"—the original approval is void. Given that this rezoning violates the City’s General Plan and environmental law, failed to follow the required procedure to change zoning, and already faces multiple lawsuits, I respectfully request that you rescind this invalid upzoning.

Sincerely,
Ramesh Ramalingam
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 David Yakobson
From: Ramesh Ramalingam <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:59 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

The FPPC confirmed that Mr. Zwick held a disqualifying conflict of interest—his employment advocating for the exact policies he voted on. He proposed, motioned, and seconded these items while disqualified from participating.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
[Name]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
10 David Yakobson
From: Ramesh Ramalingam <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:59 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ramesh Ramalingam
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
11 David Yakobson
From: Lainie Zepeda <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:05 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3.

Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds
This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
12 David Yakobson
From: TROY PARR <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:33 PM
Subject: Request to Void ALL Conflict-Tainted Votes by Crooked Zwick

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick shamefully participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:
-Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void
-Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them -Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Troy Parr - Santa Monica Voter
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
13 David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:52 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Item 11 C
-----Original Message-----
From: Elisa Olson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:06 PM
To: Council Mailbox <[email protected]>
Subject: Item 11 C

EXTERNAL
Attention Council Members
Withdraw item #11 C until the matter can be accurately investigated and evaluated.

Sincerely,
Long time residents of Santa Monica
Elisa and Elliott Olson
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
14 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:56 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected]
Cc: Scott Harris
Subject: re: Agenda item number 11-C

EXTERNAL
Dear City Council,
My husband and I have been home owners in Sunset Park since 2011.

We are very upset with you possibly increasing building heights, floor areas, and changing setbacks (we have our new neighbors now looking into our living room and backyard because of your cityplanning changes) in our neighborhoods. This goes beyond state law requirements.

Unfortunately, this is NOT the Santa Monica we moved to, where our children go to school, and have been a part of for over a decade. Your proposed changes are not only unsightly, but also are making it an unfit, unhappy place to live in.

We have lived in many cities throughout the US and countries and have always been pleased with our city councils and the direction our communities were headed. We have loved living in Santa Monica until recently and are sorely disappointed with all the new builds (high rises along Lincoln) and the direction you are leading our community.

Please think about this thoughtfully before you vote.

Respectfully,
Jennifer & Scott Harris
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
15 David Yakobson
From: athena baron <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2:29 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Athena Baron
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
16 David Yakobson
From: athena baron <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2:30 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Athena baron
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
17 David Yakobson
From: athena baron <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2:30 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

According to the Petrovich v. City of Sacramento ruling, a conflicted councilmember's participation in a quasijudicial decision invalidates the entire decision. The City cannot simply "re-vote"—the original approval is void. Given that this rezoning violates the City’s General Plan and environmental law, failed to follow the required procedure to change zoning, and already faces multiple lawsuits, I respectfully request that you rescind this invalid upzoning.

Sincerely,
Athena Baron
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
18 David Yakobson
From: Shari Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2:31 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: RE: Item 11C

EXTERNAL
Dear SM City Council Members,
Please withdraw Item 11C until the matter can be accurately investigated and evaluated. We must take the time to make sure whether or not this is the best move for our city.

Thanks,
Shari Phillips
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
19 David Yakobson
From: Thea Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2:35 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: 11C

Cheers,
Thea Phillips
310.387.5661
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
20 David Yakobson
From: diana hinek <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2:51 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Diana Hinek,
Santa Monica resident and home owner, mother, business owner Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
21 David Yakobson
From: Katie Doerr
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 3:24 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: David Yakobson
Subject: RE: 1-13-25 City Council Item 11C: OPPOSE - Rescind Rezoning 2644 30th Street Moved By Zwick and Other Conflicts/Irregularities
Correct, no redaction necessary. Thanks.

From: councilmtgitems <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:57 AM
To: Katie Doerr <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: 1-13-25 City Council Item 11C: OPPOSE - Rescind Rezoning 2644 30th Street Moved By Zwick and Other Conflicts/Irregularities
Hi Katie,
I’m assuming these emails won’t need any redactions, but before I include them with written comments, are you able to confirm?
Thank you
David Yakobson
Staff Assistant III
(310) 458-8211 x2066
santamonica.gov
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
Subscribe to City of Santa Monica Email Updates
From: Nikki Kolhoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1:22 AM
To: councilmtgitems <[email protected]>; Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Caroline Torosis <[email protected]>; Ellis Raskin <[email protected]>; Barry Snell <[email protected]>; Natalya Zernitskaya <[email protected]>; Dan Hall <[email protected]>; Jesse Zwick <[email protected]> Cc: Oliver Chi <[email protected]>; Heidi von Tongeln <[email protected]> Subject: 1-13-25 City Council Item 11C: OPPOSE - Rescind Rezoning 2644 30th Street Moved By Zwick and Other Conflicts/Irregularities

EXTERNAL
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
22 Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers:

I urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest, as well as other potential conflicts and procedural irregularities.

The rezoning from R1 to Neighborhood Commercial allows housing developments up to 85' tall with state bonuses. Two lawsuits have been filed alleging failure to comply with CEQA, violation of the general plan, and failure to follow required zoning change procedures.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The FPPC determined that Councilmember Zwick could not legally participate in housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition (HAC). Since he made the motions to approve both the rezoning on September 30, 2025 and the limited covenant on October 14, 2025, these votes are invalid under California law.

HAC endorsed Jesse Zwick, Natalya Zernitskaya and Caroline Torosis in 2022 and Barry Snell, Dan Hall, Natalya Zernitskaya and Ellis Raskin in 2024. To receive such endorsements, candidates typically must affirm alignment with the group's legislative goals (such as upzoning and parking lot infill). This raises questions about whether other councilmembers may also have conflicts when voting on housing production items aligned with HAC's goals.

Additionally, multiple employees of the lobbying firm involved in this matter made donations in 2024 to CEPS, a PAC that endorsed Barry Snell, Dan Hall, Natalya Zernitskaya and Ellis Raskin. This web of financial and political relationships raises serious questions about the independence of the decision-making process.

HOUSING PRODUCTION ITEMS INVALID
The City Attorney placed certain housing production items in which Zwick participated on Item 11C for Council to reapprove or ratify. The 2644 30th Street rezoning is not included, despite being originally brought forward in a package of zoning changes intended to increase housing production.

During this time, Zwick also brought forward the upzoning of surface parking lots, which would apply to 2644 30th Street once upzoned. The elimination of surface parking for infill development is a specific policy HAC advocates for, reinforcing the pattern of conflicts.

QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISION IS VOID
Because a zoning change is a quasi-judicial decision, Councilmember Zwick's motion to approve the rezoning on September 30, 2025 is invalid. The October 14, 2025 covenant motion is also invalid. Furthermore, the covenant flows from an invalid upzoning and is therefore moot.

PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITIES
This item was brought forward by a lobbyist without the standard application process or $34,000 fee. Emails show the lobbyist drafted much of the staff report, resolution and ordinance, which created a false narrative that they were correcting an error instead of changing the land use that was established 15 years ago (see attached).

Staff appears to have characterized this as "legislative" despite it being the quasi-judicial zoning change of one building on one parcel, seemingly to avoid higher scrutiny.

Council had voted to table this item and pursue amendments to the legal non-conforming use code instead, which would not increase housing production. While residents were told staff were too busy for that work, the Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
23 lobbyist continued working with staff on the upzoning. Emails show Mayor Torosis was in discussions with the lobbyist during this period. The City Attorney wrote to the lobbyist: "Councilmember Torosis mentioned that you have additional facts/suggested edits for the resolution and ordinance... Would you mind sending along what you have so we can ensure we have everything?"
Residents were not afforded this same access. Instead, our public comment time is frequently cut to one minute—a change Mayor Torosis told me was made to align with the County, her employer. This creates a twotiered system where lobbyists draft city legislation while residents' voices are limited.

RESCISSION
To redo the rezoning, Council would need to start from the beginning with a public hearing, new motion, and new vote—not simply "ratify" an invalid motion. However, given that the rezoning violates the City's General Plan, ignored environmental implications, failed to follow required procedures, and is the subject of multiple lawsuits, the ethical approach is to formally declare the rezoning invalid and rescind it.

Thank you,
Nikki Kolhoff
Santa Monica Resident and Voter
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
24 David Yakobson
From: Jennifer Montesi <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; Heather Averick
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Montesi
--
Jennifer L. Montesi, Ph.D.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
25 Licensed Clinical Psychologist
CA PSY 25940
Clinical Associate Professor
UCLA Department of Psychology
[email protected]
www.jennifermontesiphd.com
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
26 David Yakobson
From: Randolph Davis <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 3:33 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,

Randolph Davis
Compass Brentwood
11601 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 101
Los Angeles CA 90025
m: 310.382.4392
[email protected]
DRE# 01426183
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
27 To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
28 David Yakobson
From: Sacha Feldman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:38 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Sacha Feldman
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
29 David Yakobson
From: Julie Pearl Slater <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 3:53 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
30 David Yakobson
From: Jane Gonzalez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 4:11 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Jane Gonzalez
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
31 David Yakobson
From: Kathy Kane <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 4:11 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned and very upset about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Kathy Cody
Bay Street, Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
32 David Yakobson
From: Kathy Kane <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 4:12 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Kathy Cody
Bay Street, Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
33 David Yakobson
From: The Lable Group Limited <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 4:12 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in the beautiful and safe North of Montana neighborhood for just 18 months, and I chose this area for its quiet and peaceful atmosphere. The ability to walk to Montana Avenue for shopping and dining is something I truly cherish. However, I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could drastically change our community.

This ordinance would allow new housing developments to reach three stories, and significantly increase the floor area limits with much smaller setbacks than we currently have. We shouldn’t be going beyond the limits established by state law, SB1123, and I fear that if this ordinance passes, it will fundamentally alter the neighborhoods we love. This isn't what Santa Monicans voted for when they elected you.

The rushed nature of this process, which has not allowed for meaningful citizen input, is unacceptable.

Density is not synonymous with affordability, and we cannot add housing without fully understanding the implications for safety, evacuation capacity, and our existing infrastructure.

I urge you to reconsider this ordinance and roll it back before it goes to the Planning Commission. Let’s preserve the charm and safety of our neighborhoods, for ourselves and future generations.

Thank you for your attention.

Stephen J. Lable
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
34 David Yakobson
From: David Gilmore <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 4:36 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
David Gilmore
Sunset Park
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
35 David Yakobson
From: Edgar Vasquez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 4:55 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve only lived in Santa Monica for a year, but in that short time, I’ve come to appreciate the safety, cleanliness, and charm of our neighborhoods. The local parks, the wonderful restaurants, and grocery stores within walking distance make this place feel special. However, I’m deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could change everything I love about our community.

This new ordinance goes beyond the recent state law, SB1123, allowing three-story buildings and significantly larger developments. I believe the lack of 3+story buildings is what makes Santa Monica unique and picturesque. Each home is able to get natural sunlight instead of it being blocked by 3+story buildings. The potential density increase could completely alter our neighborhoods, making them unrecognizable and putting a strain on our infrastructure, safety, and evacuation capacity.

The rushed process around this zoning change is troubling. It feels like our voices are being overlooked during a time when meaningful public input is essential. We shouldn’t be moving forward with something so impactful without truly understanding its implications.

I urge you to roll back this proposal and listen to the community. We can find solutions that respect the character of Santa Monica without rushing into irreversible decisions.

Please stop this ordinance before it goes any further.

Edgar Vasquez
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Elizabeth Selby <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:45 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; [email protected]; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for items 10.A and 11.C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
As a 22-year resident of Santa Monica and a municipal affordable housing finance professional, I would like to provide my support to items 10.A and 11.C.

Regarding item 10.A, this program provides flexibility to developers to properly develop and finance Cityapproved multifamily housing projects. While Santa Monica residents continue to have the discretion to provide meaningful oversight of housing produced in the City, flexibility for developers to best address community needs and secure financing drives down costs and speeds production of approved projects. The more quickly a project is developed and the less expensive it is to develop drives rents down. This benefits our entire community.

Regarding item 11.C, I strongly support staff recommendations. These thoughtful and well-researched recommendations preserve environmental health, allow for new units to be built in a manner consistent with the scale of our community, and do not reduce safety outcomes for residents.

As the state becomes increasingly insistent on imposing their will over the will of individual communities, these recommendations are a thoughtful way for the City of Santa Monica to continue to determine our own destiny.

Kind regards,
Elizabeth Selby
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Janis Adams <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:23 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick Subject: Please listen to the residents. Please.

EXTERNAL
Please stop overly tall buildings in Sunset Park!
I’ve lived on Pearl St. for 30 years.

This sweet little neighborhood cannot support over building.

It’s just a little neighborhood and already Pearl St. is jammed with cars trying to access the freeway at 5:00.

Please vote against multi-lot, multi-storied buildings in Sunset Park.

Otherwise, the neighborhood will be ruined.

Thank you,
Janis Adams
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: Tuvya Zaretsky <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:34 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman; Tuvya Zaretsky
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I write with great concern regarding the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my block and throughout our Sunset Park neighborhoods. As a homeowner, in a low density neighborhood, I strongly object to rezoning considerations under consideration that goes beyond state law with this ordinance. SB1123 was already a significant shift.

I, along with our neighbors, have spoken with developers who I believe are pushing for this change without regard for the significant and concerning impacts to our lives and community, I feel such a substantial rezoning is unnecessary and does not warrant the negative safety impacts upon our low density neighborhoods. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.

As a long time Santa Monica homeowner, I do not believe there is a need to go to three stories.

I am not convinced there is a need to increase FAR to 1.5 and respectfully oppose it.

I don’t believe Santa Monica needs reduced setbacks.

I already felt unrepresented by the original SB1123 law. It is CA law now, but please do not do anything to exceed its provisions. Regarding Agenda Item 11C(2), I ask that you NOT send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please consider my request and the voices of other Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for your work on behalf of us all.

Sincerely,
Tuvya Zaretsky
32nd Street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 David Yakobson
From: Matt Goldenberg D.O. <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:34 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis
Cc: Oliver Chi; Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Oppose 11C: Request for Transparency and Process Clarification Re: SB 1123

EXTERNAL
Mayor Torosis,
Thank you for your prompt responses to many members of the NOMA, FOSP, NEN and PNA neighborhoods. It has come to our attention that many of the neighbors who wrote to the City Council about their concerns and opposition to Agenda Item 11C, specifically those who OPPOSED any action going beyond the State Law of SB1123, have received similar responses from you.

Our primary concern is ensuring full transparency and clarity in the City Council’s process. While the responses provided to community members may be technically accurate, we are concerned that they do not fully reflect the practical implications of the actions under consideration.

It is our understanding that the only way to ensure the Council does NOT proceed beyond the requirements of state law is to rescind the prior emergency action AND refrain from taking any vote this evening related to AB 1123—including votes to initiate either an emergency or standard process by referring an ordinance to the Planning Commission.

Put simply, any action taken tonight regarding AB 1123 would constitute a step toward exceeding state law.

Opposition to going beyond state law is precisely the concern expressed by residents in our neighborhoods!
In trying to fully understand what this vote re: SB 1123 does and does not do, we seek to clarify a few points:
- 1. Scope vs. consequence of the vote
When you state that the City Council is “not adopting a zoning ordinance” and that “no rules are being locked in,” can you please confirm that the vote nonetheless constitutes a required procedural step without which the underlying ordinance could not ultimately be enacted?

2. Prior emergency action
Can you confirm whether this same policy was previously adopted by the Council on an emergency basis, and whether that action was subsequently challenged in court on the grounds that the Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 circumstances did not meet the legal standard for an emergency?

3. Reintroduction with direction
Following that challenge, can you confirm whether the measure was reintroduced through the City's normal legislative process, accompanied by non-standard direction to the Planning Commission instructing it to ensure the measure’s approval?

4. Reason the item returned to Council
You state that the current action would “restart a public review process.” Can you confirm whether the reason this matter is before the Council at all is an independent determination that the original sponsoring councilmember was conflicted at the time of the prior vote, rendering that vote invalid?

5. Sponsor’s role and donor involvement
Can you confirm whether the same sponsoring council member participated in drafting the language of the ordinance in coordination with a major donor who stood to uniquely benefit from its adoption? And can you confirm whether this donor-related issue is separate from—and in addition to—the conflict of interest that invalidated the prior vote?

6. Characterization of Council discretion
When you state that the Council is merely deciding “whether to study how those laws should be addressed locally,” can you confirm whether Council declining to restart this process would, as a practical matter, prevent the ordinance from advancing in its current form? (As this is what the letters you received, and responded to, were advocating for. Not advancing the process in any form or function.)
Warmly,
Matt Goldenberg, Vice-Chair of NOMA
John Reynolds Vice President of FOSP
Tricia Crane, Chair of Northeast Neighbors
Brian O'Neil, Co-Chair of PNA
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 David Yakobson
From: Tuvya Zaretsky <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:38 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Tuvya Zaretsky
32nd Street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 David Yakobson
From: Kathy Knight <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:38 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
January 13, 2026
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

The Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) confirmed that Mr. Zwick held a disqualifying conflict of interest—his employment advocating for the exact policies he voted on. He proposed, motioned, and seconded these items while disqualified from participating.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void.

Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them.

To require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process.

Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Sincerely,
Kathy Knight and Joe Faris
Sunset Park residents for 30 years
[email protected]
(310) 450-5961
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 David Yakobson
From: Jar <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:44 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
JB
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 David Yakobson
From: Jar <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:45 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Cc: Shawn Landres
Subject: Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for two years, drawn to the beautiful vibe of Santa Monica. It’s a community I cherish, and that’s why I’m deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could dramatically change our neighborhoods. This rushed process isn’t normal for such significant rezoning, and it feels like we’re being pushed into something without adequate consideration or input from those who call this place home.

Allowing three-story buildings with much larger floor areas and smaller setbacks doesn’t just alter the skyline; it risks the very essence of what makes our community special. Density does not equate to affordability, and cramming more people into our neighborhoods neglects critical factors like safety, evacuation capacity, and the strain on our infrastructure. This isn’t what we voted for when we elected you.

I urge you to reconsider and roll back this ordinance before it goes to the Planning Commission, where it may be too late for meaningful change. Let’s prioritize thoughtful, community-driven planning that respects our shared values. Please don’t send this unneeded ordinance forward.

Thank you for your consideration.

JB
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 David Yakobson
From: Jill Jurenka <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:46 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Jill Jurenka
2235 23RD St. Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
10 David Yakobson
From: Jill Jurenka <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:47 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Jill Jurenka
2235 23RD St. Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
11 David Yakobson
From: Charles Andrews <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:50 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi
Subject: subject 11C(2) - do not advance the ROI for SB1123 local ordinance

EXTERNAL
To Our City Council:

I am not an architect, or city planner, or politician. But as someone who loves Santa Monica and has lived here 40 years, I often take walks around my lovely neighborhood, and I can recognize a big stinky pile of something that should not be there, and should be immediately eliminated by the parties responsible.

You will get plenty of professional breakdowns of all the specific reasons why your SB 1123 is such a very bad idea, so allow me to take the overview.

Like other domains of our government, you have gone way to FAR with this one, and people will not forget. Just in case you want to continue your political careers.

You have already demonstrated too many times your ideological worship of density, but this really takes the mask off. You wave the false flag of "affordable housing," then you take bad legislation from Sacramento and double down, without even a pretense that this is furthering the affordability of future housing. Three stories replacing two, increased FAR, and most remarkably, removing even the minimal strictures for affordable units. Pure and simple, this will benefit the bottom lines of developers, and further destroy what used to be charming and desirable about Santa Monica, with no benefit for our affordability crisis.

Since your true intentions have become well displayed, here's a thought: get your fellow Council member Zwick to scare up five more well-paid positions lobbying for increased dense housing, so we can recuse you all from housing votes, and the bad ones will all go down, on a 1 -0 vote. (Thank you, Lana.)
And while you txry to straighten out the Zwick scandal, please make your first re-vote about our SM Civic Auditorium. We need to get back to that as soon as possible. And that re=vote might just salvage your careers. Please back up and do the right things, and make this a happy new year for the residents of this once-great city. Kick this uncalled for, unnecessary and damaging ordinance down the road, so far you never come back to it. Please.

Thank you.

Charles Andrews
40 years in Ocean Park
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
12 15 years a columnist for The Mirror and the SM Daily Press Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
13 David Yakobson
From: Michael J <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:53 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I have lived in Northeast Santa Monica for 45 years, a community I cherish for its walkability, tranquility, and friendly neighbors. I am writing to voice my concern about the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to forever change our beloved city. The proposal to allow new housing projects to rise three stories and exceed current floor-area limits by 50% is deeply troubling. Such drastic changes will densify our neighborhoods to a point where they may become unrecognizable.

I believe the increased density and housing will overwhelm the current infrastructure and parking necessity, which is being overlooked. This is not merely about building more homes; it’s about maintaining the safety and livability of our community. Adding density without understanding the implications on evacuation capacity and infrastructure demands is reckless.

Moreover, this rushed process for such a significant rezoning is unacceptable. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law, as outlined in SB1123. Density does not equal affordability, and this isn’t what Santa Monicans voted for when we elected this council.

I urge you to reconsider this ordinance. Please roll it back and give our community the chance to engage meaningfully in this important decision. Let’s protect Santa Monica's essence together. --
Michael Jolly
Santa Monica, CA
Sent from iMac on Gmail
Electronic Privacy Notice: This email and any attachments contain information that is or could be covered by electronic communications privacy laws and is confidential and proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
14 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:55 AM
To: Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected]
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers, I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated. The FPPC confirmed that Mr. Zwick held a disqualifying conflict of interest—his employment advocating for the exact policies he voted on. He proposed, motioned, and seconded these items while disqualified from participating. Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust. I request that the City Council: Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves. Thank you. Sincerely, [Name] Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
15 David Yakobson
From: Mark Borenstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:56 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Oppose Agenda Items 11C(2) and 10(A)

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I write to oppose the City Attorney’s recommendation to re-vote on several housing related actions taken by the City Council when Council Member Jesse Zwick was under a conflict of interest because of his negotiation for, and ultimate acceptance of a job with the Housing Action Coalition (HAC). These are grouped under Item 11-C on the Council’s agenda for its January 13, 2026 meeting. The Council should also reject the re-vote on, and extension of the Pilot Program for the City’s Affordable Housing Production Program, Item 10A.

1. You have received many comments about Mr. Zwick’s conflict; I will not repeat the history of Mr.

Zwick’s ethical violations you have already received. Although the City Attorney contends she and Mr.

Zwick have been completely transparent in this matter, both Mr. Zwick and the City Attorney have refused to release information concerning when Mr. Zwick first began considering a position with HAC. It was undoubtedly well before August 18, 2025, when Mr. Zwick accepted a well-paid position with HAC.

The staff report on Item 11-C suggests that Mr. Zwick expressed interest in a position with HAC in June 2025, and perhaps earlier.

His disqualification from housing-related Council business should date from when Mr. Zwick first began considering HAC employment, since that is when Mr. Zwick began, in effect, auditioning for employment on housing issues. At a minimum, the City Attorney needs to disclose the earliest date when Mr. Zwick said he might be interested in a job with HAC. All housing related actions by the Council from that date are likely void. That is why the emergency ordinance on SB1123, already the subject of litigation, should be repealed.

2. The re-vote on the Resolution to have the Planning Commission consider a local SB1123 ordinance, as initially proposed by Mr. Zwick, is unnecessary. We now know the local emergency ordinance was proposed by Mr. Zwick at the behest of a developer, Stephen Anderson in December 2024 and January 2025. Obviously, there was no emergency 6 months later when Mr. Zwick proposed the emergency. The emergency ordinance by Mr. Zwick to allow ADUs and to relax development standards was virtually verbatim from the developer, without any disclosure by Mr. Zwick of its provenance and more importantly, without any evaluation by the Planning department as to whether Santa Monica needed a local SB1123 ordinance. No other jurisdiction has adopted a local SB1123 ordinance since state law already provides development standards and ministerial review of SB1123 projects.

There is no reason for a Resolution re-vote to include anything about SB1123. The state standards Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
16 provide all the needed incentives for developers to use SB1123 to develop single family homes (albeit expensive, market rate homes that do nothing to help the City increase moderate and low income housing). The Resolution should delete any reference to SB1123.

The City has yet to honor its July 2025 promise to the Housing and Community Development agency to repeal the illegal amendment to the local SB9 ordinance that eliminated owner occupancy. The Planning Department has yet to publish its recommendation for some version of a local SB9-type ordinance that attempts to eliminate owner occupancy again. Yet the Council has directed the Commission to consider these issues as part of the Resolution. Why would the Council Members want to waste the Commissioners’ time with a local SB1123 ordinance when these other significant issues are already on the Commission’s agenda?
If the Council insists on having the Commission devote time to a SB1123 local ordinance, it must make clear the Commission is to start from scratch. It must not use the developer driven, emergency SB1123 ordinance as the baseline for crafting a new proposed ordinance.

3. On Agenda Item 10-A, the Council cannot simply re-vote on the Pilot Program for the City’s Affordable Housing Production Program (AHPP), first adopted by emergency ordinance on August 12, 2025. Nor can it adopt a regular ordinance to retroactively approve the pilot program it improperly adopted on Augst 12, 2025. There was no public notice of the proposed regular ordinance; nor was it sent to the Planning Commission for consideration. The same is true for the proposed first reading of a regular ordinance to codify the expansion of the AHPP pilot program beyond the 1000 units. The staff indicated that these proposed ordinances are part of the 6th Cycle Housing Element. They are subject to SMMC 9.37.050(B) which requires 20 days published notice.

Beyond the process—the community needs more than a few days to consider this extraordinary procedure to reinstate an obviously ethically challenged emergency ordinance and approve a new one, the policy is another developer giveaway without increasing the affordable housing the City needs. Mr.

Zwick’s new employer even sent its executive director—Mr. Zwick’s new boss, to testify in person in favor of the pilot program, a few days before Mr., Zwick accepted employment, all without Mr. Zwick disclosing anything to the public. What hubris! The pilot program will create moderate and low income ghettos while at the same time, it will bail out aggressive developers who promised affordable housing in exchange for excessive bonus density. It is likely that some of the promised affordable housing will not be built within four years of the market rate housing. The affordable housing might never get built. The developers should be held to their commitment to construct housing in multi-income buildings, or their bonus, market rate apartments should be eliminated.

The Council should abandon this folly, even in the face of a litigation threat by developers. They have nothing vested by the pilot program and are no worse off than they were before the pilot program was improperly adopted in August.

This pilot program puts the lie to the Council’s claim to support affordable housing and the “missing middle” housing our community needs. This is bad policy masquerading as a boon to low and moderate income housing. The Council should not accept the City Attorney’s invitation to redo the original vote and the Planning Department suggestion to expand a very bad program.

Mark Borenstein
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
17 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:57 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Agenda Item 11-C for council mtg 1/13/26 re housing density

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Councilmembers:

Please OPPOSE Irresponsible DensificaƟon – SB1123 SM local zoning ordinance I’m a resident of the Sunset Park neighborhood and strongly prefer that we, as a city, not exceed the requirements of CA State law on housing density in single-family zoned neighborhoods. I oppose any ordinance (or council member in support) that would permit 3 stories or allow 50% more floor area than at current. Please do the same and permit only responsible, measured, growth in density in Santa Monica.

Thank you,
Jim Jusko
2244 26th Street, Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
18 David Yakobson
From: Maryanne Korenic <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:58 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
As a longtime Ocean Park resident for 20 years, I cherish the strong sense of community and safety our neighborhood offers. It’s disheartening to see plans for a new zoning ordinance that threaten the very fabric of our beloved Santa Monica. The proposed changes, allowing three-story buildings and significantly increased floor area, are a drastic shift that I, along with many others, never voted for when electing this council.

This process feels rushed and isn’t what we expect for such a monumental change. We need time for thoughtful discussions, not hurried decisions that sidestep community input. Increasing density without a clear understanding of the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands is reckless. Our neighborhoods deserve more consideration than this.

Please reconsider pushing this ordinance forward. It is not necessary to exceed state law or to make our neighborhoods unrecognizable. I urge you to roll back this proposal. Let’s prioritize the values that brought us all to Santa Monica—community, safety, and thoughtful development.

Now is the time to act. We must ensure our voices are heard before it’s too late.

Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
19 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:59 AM
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause

11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Wilma Hall
Sunset Park resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
20 David Yakobson
From: Lian Bloch <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:59 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
As a resident of Sunset Park for the past 40 years, I’ve cherished the close-knit community we’ve built, where neighbors know each other and local businesses thrive. This sense of safety and camaraderie is something I hold dear. While I understand the general need for more housing, I am very worried about the direction that Santa Monica is going with a reactionary and excessive emphasis on hyper-development within existing residential zones.

The proposed zoning ordinance is alarming, allowing new housing projects to soar to three stories with minimal setbacks, well beyond the already-expansive limits of SB1123. The rushed process of this rezoning is frustrating and has left no room for genuine community input. We cannot simply add density without fully understanding the implications on safety, traffic, and infrastructure demands.

I urge you to roll back this proposal and not send it forward to the Planning Commission. We must prioritize maintaining the livability and safety of our neighborhoods. Please listen to the voices of the community before making such irrevocable changes.

Please consider and thank you.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
21 David Yakobson
From: Heather Thomason <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:00 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: 11c - emphasis on 1123-related, rescind all previous votes that included Jesse Zwick's vote

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Council Members,
I respectfully but urgently request that you rescind all housing-related votes in which Councilman Jesse Zwick participated—both those under reconsideration tonight and others not yet being revisited. While I don't question his intentions, the fact remains that he was in a conflicted position from which he significantly influenced these housing votes through his participation in discussions and, in many cases, as the key motioner or seconder. If Council wishes to advance these items again, we need a clean process with different members bringing items forward, motioning, and seconding—and passing them under those circumstances.

The SB1123 Local Ordinance Requires Special Attention
The SB1123 local ordinance is particularly troubling. This ordinance is not legally required from everything I can tell, and its process has been compromised from the start.

Consider this timeline:
 The ordinance was initially proposed by a for-profit developer who dictated its terms to Councilman Zwick entirely outside public view. These communications only came to light through either a PRA or lawsuit discovery, but regardless was not viewed publicly without those.  The item was brought forward on an "emergency" basis during the exact period when the FPPC's independent findings determined Councilman Zwick had a conflict of interest. This emergency designation rushed the ordinance into law immediately, bypassing the Planning Commission, skipping any study, eliminating the normal planning process, and avoiding standard public engagement. There was no actual emergency.
 Councilman Zwick participated enthusiastically and meaningfully in the discussion, even actively attempting to influence colleagues' votes (as he confirmed to me directly). At the time, his colleagues, you all, had no reason to know you were hearing arguments from someone with a material conflict of interest. You were entitled to consider his position as one offered in good faith, representing constituent interests rather than a future employer's interests. This was a discussion he should never have been part of, regarding an ordinance that should never have been brought forward under these circumstances.
 The original motion to take it to a vote was by Zwick.  With the conflicted vote providing the crucial fifth vote needed for an emergency ordinance, it barely passed.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
22 The Subsequent Actions Are Equally Concerning
The emergency ordinance drew a well-founded lawsuit challenging its emergency status. This led Council—while still allowing the conflicted member to vote on housing matters—to attempt to codify it differently as backup. You voted to send it to the Planning Commission, again using Councilman Zwick's votes to get there. But you didn't simply request Planning Commission study—you directed them to return with affirmative approval. The fact that city staff didn't even provide images showing what this major, dramatic change might look like or its neighborhood impacts makes clear the goal was simply to rubber-stamp approval with minimal public engagement.

I understand the urgency to address affordable housing. But cutting corners and working sub rosa does a disservice to this important cause. Proceeding this way damages the very issue you want to support.

This Is an Opportunity to Get It Right
This chance to revisit these votes is a gift—an opportunity to right the ship. Now that the conflict has been established by independent findings, you can make decisions based on complete information about the provenance of these proposals. If you choose to proceed, you need everything fresh: new motion, new second, new process.

But most importantly: no new ordinance is required, and it certainly isn't required to relax neighborhood development standards in order to implement SB1123.

Why are we doing this? You don't need to do this. And you certainly shouldn't do it with any recommendation to go to 3 stories, 1.5 FAR, or reduced setbacks.

Thank you for your consideration.

Heather
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
23 David Yakobson
From: Carol Joffe <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 12:00 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 30 years, drawn by its tree-lined streets and the sense of community that fills our neighborhood. These qualities are now at risk as you consider a zoning ordinance that would drastically reshape Santa Monica. The potential for three-story housing developments and increased floor area limits threatens the very essence of what we love about our home.

This proposal goes beyond the boundaries set by state law and does not reflect the values we voted for when electing you. A rushed process like this, with little room for citizen input, is unacceptable for such a significant change. We need to prioritize thoughtful planning over density; more density does not equal more affordability, and we must consider the implications on safety, evacuation, and our infrastructure.

Please do not move forward with this unnecessary ordinance. Our neighborhoods deserve better, and we must not allow this rushed decision to go unchallenged. I urge you to roll back this proposal and listen to the voices of those who cherish Santa Monica as it is.

Make the right choice for our community.

Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Rashmi Mulllur <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:51 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve called Sunset Park my home for the past 10 years, drawn here by the safety and excellent schools that foster a family-oriented environment. I cherish the quiet streets and the sense of community that comes from a neighborhood that has not been overbuilt or urbanized. However, the proposed zoning ordinance threatens to change all that.

This plan to allow multi-story buildings with much higher density goes far beyond what even the new state law, SB1123, allows. Adding such density in a hurried process without adequate community input is not what we, as Santa Monicans, voted for when we elected you. Density does not equate to affordability, and it’s crucial to consider the implications this change will have on our safety, evacuation routes, and overall infrastructure.

We cannot rush into irreversible changes that would densify our neighborhoods to the point of unrecognizability. I urge you to roll back this proposed ordinance. Please do not send it forward to the Planning Commission. We need a process that respects our voices and the distinct character of our beloved community.

Let’s ensure that Santa Monica remains a place where families can thrive in safety and serenity. Please act now.
-Rashmi Mullur, MD
2670 33rd St, Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: lmarreola <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:16 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: City Council Meeting Jan 13

EXTERNAL
Please void all votes by Cou cilmember Zwick pertaing to housing Policies.

Please Rescind upzoning at 2644 30th St.

Please Oppose SB1123. Please save our Single Family neighborhoods from densification.

Carol and Larry Arreola
Sunset Park Resi
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone -------- Original message --------
From: Friends of Sunset Park <[email protected]> Date: 1/11/26 8:46 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Carol & Larry Arreola <[email protected]>
Subject: Action Alert!
View this email in your browser
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

FOSP Action Alert!
January 11, 2026
3 Critical Actions
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 WHAT’S HAPPENNG:

This week's City Council meeting is critical, and there are three actions you can take.

In addition to letter writing, we need people at Tuesday's City Council meeting to speak on these items. Please join us!

ACTION 1
Ask City Council to Declare Housing Policy Items Void due to Jesse Zwick's Conflicts of Interest
The FPPC confirmed that Councilmember Jesse Zwick—who works for an organization advocating for these exact housing policies—had a disqualifying conflict. He didn't just vote: he proposed, motioned, and seconded these items. Simply "ratifying" these compromised votes won't restore public trust. We're asking residents to write in requesting these votes be declared null and void, then only brought back if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them. This is about ensuring a clean, uncompromised process—not the policies themselves.

Write your own letter, or use this LINK to send a pre-written letter.

Scroll down for the text of the letter and email addresses if the letter doesn't populate for you.

Please send before noon on Tuesday, January 13.

ACTION 2
Ask Council to Reject a Zoning Ordinance that Goes Far Beyond State Law to Densify Residential Neighborhoods
A zoning ordinance that will existentially change all of Sunset Park and much of Santa Monica is being pushed by Members of the City Council. They are going far beyond state law requirements: raising height limits in all R-1 neighborhoods to 3 stories, expanding buildable footprints by 50%, and permitting much reduced setbacks, which will allow for Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 massive, market rate townhome complexes on any lot, and multi-lot complexes. This could densify every residential neighborhood to the point of unrecognizability. The state law they're using as cover is already active—anyone can use it now. No other city in the state is doing this. The Council is re-voting on whether to send this ordinance to the Planning Commission following Zwick's conflicts. We must stop it now. This will change our neighborhood forever.

Use this LINK (and a new program) to write your own letter or use it to generate a letter specifically tailored to your unique preferences.

Or use this LINK to send a pre-written letter.

Scroll down for the text of the letter and email addresses if the letter doesn't populate for you.

Please send before noon on Tuesday, January 13.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

ACTION 3
Ask Council to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street
The FPPC found Councilmember Jesse Zwick had a disqualifying conflict due to his Housing Action Coalition employment, yet he made the motions to approve the 2644 30th Street rezoning allowing 85-foot tall housing projects. California law voids such quasijudicial decisions, requiring a complete restart. While the City reconsiders other Zwick Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 housing decisions, this rezoning— which violates the City’s General Plan and environmental law, failed to follow the required procedure to change zoning, and is the subject of multiple lawsuits against the City—remains uncorrected. Residents urge the Council to rescind it at their January 13, 2026 meeting before irreversible development proceeds.

Write your own letter, or use this LINK to send a pre-written letter.

Scroll down for the text of the letter and email addresses if the letter doesn't populate for you.

Please send before noon on Tuesday, January 13.

Letter to City Councilmembers
Action 1
TO: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
SUBJECT: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void

2. Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
[Name]

Letter to City Councilmembers
Action 2
TO: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
SUBJECT: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica residents and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Letter to City Councilmembers
Action 3
TO: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
SUBJECT: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street Dear Mayor Torosis and City Councilmembers,
I to urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 Sincerely,
[Name]
Thank you for taking action!
Stay informed! – Join Friends of Sunset Park
Becoming a member is a great way to connect with neighbors.

Friends of Sunset Park is a city-recognized non-profit neighborhood organization working to improve the quality of life for all residents of Sunset Park and Santa Monica.

Please join us!
Visit our website to join or renew: www.FriendsofSunsetPark.org Visit the Friends of Sunset Park Facebook Page here.

Add your voice to your neighborhood!
www.FriendsofSunsetPark.org

You are receiving this email because you're a current or prospective member of FOSP Our mailing address is:

Friends of Sunset Park
PO Box 5823
Santa Monica, CA 90409-5823
Add us to your address book
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
10 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
11 David Yakobson
From: Ray and Dina Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:17 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Jesse Zwick voting

EXTERNAL
Council Members,
We have been reading of the situation where a member, Jesse Zwick has been voting on items that will financially benefit his employer, and in turn, himself.

Assuming these reports are true. It seems to us that this is unethical and a conflict of interest.

First, he should resign from the City Council.

Second, if he does not resign, he should recuse himself from future voting on anything related to real estate development proposed by his employer.

Third, anything he voted on before should be revoted.

Thank you,
Raymond and Nadina Johnson
Santa Monica residents

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: lmarreola <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:04 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Action Alert!

EXTERNAL
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone -------- Original message --------
From: Friends of Sunset Park <[email protected]> Date: 1/11/26 8:46 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Carol & Larry Arreola <[email protected]>
Subject: Action Alert!
View this email in your browser
To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

FOSP Action Alert!
January 11, 2026
3 Critical Actions
WHAT’S HAPPENNG:

This week's City Council meeting is critical, and there are three actions you can take.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 In addition to letter writing, we need people at Tuesday's City Council meeting to speak on these items. Please join us!

Write your own letter, or use this LINK to send a pre-written letter.

Scroll down for the text of the letter and email addresses if the letter doesn't populate for you.

Please send before noon on Tuesday, January 13.

ACTION 2
Ask Council to Reject a Zoning Ordinance that Goes Far Beyond State Law to Densify Residential Neighborhoods
A zoning ordinance that will existentially change all of Sunset Park and much of Santa Monica is being pushed by Members of the City Council. They are going far beyond state law requirements: raising height limits in all R-1 neighborhoods to 3 stories, expanding buildable footprints by 50%, and permitting much reduced setbacks, which will allow for massive, market rate townhome complexes on any lot, and multi-lot complexes. This could densify every residential neighborhood to the point of unrecognizability. The state law they're using as cover is already active—anyone can use it now. No other city in the state Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 is doing this. The Council is re-voting on whether to send this ordinance to the Planning Commission following Zwick's conflicts. We must stop it now. This will change our neighborhood forever.

Use this LINK (and a new program) to write your own letter or use it to generate a letter specifically tailored to your unique preferences.

Or use this LINK to send a pre-written letter.

Scroll down for the text of the letter and email addresses if the letter doesn't populate for you.

Please send before noon on Tuesday, January 13.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

ACTION 3
Ask Council to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street
The FPPC found Councilmember Jesse Zwick had a disqualifying conflict due to his Housing Action Coalition employment, yet he made the motions to approve the 2644 30th Street rezoning allowing 85-foot tall housing projects. California law voids such quasijudicial decisions, requiring a complete restart. While the City reconsiders other Zwick Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 housing decisions, this rezoning— which violates the City’s General Plan and environmental law, failed to follow the required procedure to change zoning, and is the subject of multiple lawsuits against the City—remains uncorrected. Residents urge the Council to rescind it at their January 13, 2026 meeting before irreversible development proceeds.

Write your own letter, or use this LINK to send a pre-written letter.

Scroll down for the text of the letter and email addresses if the letter doesn't populate for you.

Please send before noon on Tuesday, January 13.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void

2. Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
[Name]

Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica residents and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 Sincerely,
[Name]
Thank you for taking action!
Stay informed! – Join Friends of Sunset Park
Becoming a member is a great way to connect with neighbors.

Friends of Sunset Park is a city-recognized non-profit neighborhood organization working to improve the quality of life for all residents of Sunset Park and Santa Monica.

Please join us!
Visit our website to join or renew: www.FriendsofSunsetPark.org Visit the Friends of Sunset Park Facebook Page here.

Add your voice to your neighborhood!
www.FriendsofSunsetPark.org

You are receiving this email because you're a current or prospective member of FOSP Our mailing address is:

Friends of Sunset Park
PO Box 5823
Santa Monica, CA 90409-5823
Add us to your address book
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
11 David Yakobson
From: Cathy Larson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:34 AM
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Due to the FPPC ruling, all these votes are tainted.

Thank you,
Cathy Larson
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
12 David Yakobson
From: SALLY STINER <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:36 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
SDear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
[Name]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
13 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:37 AM
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

I am a resident of Sunset Park and I have been challenged by many of the decisions of late by the newly elected City Council.

Our great city of Santa Monica is becoming overdeveloped, crime ridden and dangerous.

We are counting on your leadership to assist in returning Santa Monica to the welcoming, friendly and beautiful city that it once was. Not the over-developed and homeless center of the US.

I am respectfully asking you to declare the housing policy items void due to Jesse Zwick's conflict of interest.

Sincerely,
Lynn Novatt

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
14 David Yakobson
From: Teri D Bernstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:38 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: I am an EXEMPLAR of YIMBY and I OPPOSE item 11C

EXTERNAL
Greetings, City Councilmember--
I am an EXEMPLAR of YIMBY and I oppose item 11C
I built a home on the west side of 29th with my ex-husband in 1993 and later bought another home next door, which we rented out. He got the big house in the divorce; I got the rental house.

Behind us, on 28th street, the properties are zoned R-4 and, for the most part, 2 story apartments and condominiums exist there. LITERALLY IN MY BACK YARD. They have been good neighbors, on a human scale for the City.

When certain Councilmembers make prejudicial assumptions about who I am because I oppose Corporate building on R-1 streets, and Neighborhood Commercial encroachment across from single family homes on short boulevard streets, I feel I need to tell you who I really am.

We tore down a neighborhood eyesore, with multiple cat hotels under a lean-to on the North side, and all the window broken out to provide cat access. We had to endure all kinds of ridiculous red-tape to build there, as it seems then and since then, that the City's mandate to Building and Safety is to make things as difficult as possible for small builders. (and as easy as possible for Corporate Lobbyist Developers) It is a long story, probably more suited to a blog or a newspaper article than a City Council meeting.

Anyway, here is my situation: I believe in renting; I believe in rent control. There is a law that says I can evict my tenant by paying a relocation fee of around $40,000, so that I can move in there. My tenant is 81 years old and is still working at an office at the end of the block.

The SPIRIT of the law wants to protect tenants like mine, but $40,000 won't do it.

So, to satisfy the SPIRIT of the law, I live in a 2+1 apartment in Santa Monica while I try to get plans together to build an ADU behind the 3+2 house. But with laws changing so rapidly, it is hard to decide what to do. Two years ago, I couldn't build a 2nd story balcony on the ADU without serious setbacks. Now the city wants to allow 7 story apartment buildings 1/2 a block away that can look into every backyard. Hmm. A few years ago, the City outlawed front-facing garages, forgetting that some of us don't have alleys.Hmm.

Meanwhile, back to me and my tenant.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
15 I have paid well over the $40,000 relocation fee in rent in the last year and a half. And will continue to pay almost $4000 a month...

IT HAS BEEN THE RIGHT THING TO DO, in order to not displace an elderly tenant.

I expect the City to do the right thing, too.

I have the hope that the City Council will follow the laws the state has mandated to support housing, but not try too bend the law to look for loopholes...instead...try to follow the spirit of the law, and the mandated neighborhood meetings (LUCE) that set neighborhood standards. And stop pretending you are building affordable housing. You aren't.

We didn't elect you to be DINOs (Democrats In Name Only). We didn't elect you to follow the lead of Trump and Corporate honchos out for a buck. We elected you to protect our city.

Find out what the stories of the other people on my block are...

Thanks for listening,
Teri Davis Bernstein
Santa Monica Resident 1982-1985 and 1993-present
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
16 David Yakobson
From: Dan J. <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:45 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Members of City Council,
As a 25-year Wilmont resident, I strongly oppose the proposed zoning ordinance allowing multistory buildings and substantially increased density throughout Santa Monica and, in particular, in single-family neighborhoods.

This proposed ordinance exceeds SB 1123 and is being rushed forward with inadequate public input. A change of this scale demands justification and transparency—neither of which has been provided.

Density does not equal affordability. This proposal trades public safety, evacuation capacity, and neighborhood character for unnecessary bulk and height. It raises height limits throughout single-family districts, inflates floor-area ratios, shrinks setbacks, and abolishes stepbacks; all changes that are irreversible once imposed.

Why is the City advancing an ordinance that goes beyond state law? And why is Council willing to impose sweeping changes without demonstrating clear benefits or addressing their consequences? Santa Monica’s neighborhoods are not expendable policy experiments. Withdraw this proposed ordinance and halt further action.

Respectfully,
Daniel Jansenson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
17 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Morse <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:45 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

The FPPC confirmed that Mr. Zwick held a disqualifying conflict of interest—his employment advocating for the exact policies he voted on.

He proposed, motioned, and seconded these items while disqualified from participating.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:
**Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void
**Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them **Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Nancy M. Morse
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
18 David Yakobson
From: Joan Habschmidt <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:47 AM
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:

I urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest. The rezoning from R1 to Neighborhood Commercial allows large projects, including housing developments up to 85’ tall with state bonuses.

The FPPC has determined that Councilmember Zwick could not legally participate in housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. Since he made the motions to approve both the rezoning on September 30, 2025 and the limited covenant on October 14, 2025, these votes are invalid under California law. According to the Petrovich v. City of Sacramento ruling, a conflicted councilmember's participation in a quasi-judicial decision invalidates the entire decision. The City cannot simply "re-vote"—the original approval is void. Given that this rezoning violates the City’s General Plan and environmental law, failed to follow the required procedure to change zoning, and already faces multiple lawsuits, I respectfully request that you rescind this invalid upzoning.

Sincerely,
Joan habschmidt
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
19 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Morse <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:48 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in Santa Monica. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.
**We don’t need to go to three stories.
**We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.
**We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Nancy M. Morse
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
20 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Morse <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:50 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Nancy M. Morse
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
21 David Yakobson
From: Cathy Larson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:51 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I urge you not to support Item 11C(2).

Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission.

This proposed increase in density is an example of poor urban planning without thought of long term consequences.

Thank you,
Cathy Larson
Sunset Park Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
22 David Yakobson
From: Bob Elson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:50 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in R1 for 25 years, moving here to raise my children in a quiet and safe community with good schools. It’s disheartening to see the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens the very fabric of our neighborhoods. This plan, which pushes beyond state law, isn’t just unwarranted; it risks turning our beloved areas into bustling three-story developments with little regard for the implications on safety, infrastructure, and our quality of life.

Three stories are simply not necessary. We need to focus on sustainable growth that respects our community's character and needs. Density does not equal affordability, and we must not overlook this critical distinction. The rapid and unusual process behind this ordinance leaves little room for meaningful citizen input, which is unacceptable when you consider the lasting impact of such a sweeping change.

We elected you to represent us, and this isn’t what Santa Monicans voted for. I urge you to take a step back and reconsider this ordinance. Please do not advance this proposal any further. Let’s have a conversation about what our community truly needs before making decisions that could irreversibly alter our neighborhoods.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
N. Robert Elson, M.D.
뮄뮅뮆 Protected by MailProtect
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
23 David Yakobson
From: Marc Verville <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:54 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Lana Negrete; Attorney Mailbox
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]; councilmtgitems Subject: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause

11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

The recent revelations of massive and blatant conflicts of interest with multiple members of this Council discredit every issue it is engaging with. This hard evidence ensure that any residual trust remaining between the Council and its constituents is gone.

This boldly unethical behavior also neatly explains the indefensible votes taken to severely compromise basic safety in new multi-family buildings by eliminating a second stairwell purely for investor profit. It is the equivalent of eliminating the requirement for seat belts and airbags in cars solely to improve corporate profits. Housing prices are not construction-cost driven, they are market price driven. There is no link between the two, which is why improving profits at the expense of people’s lives is so abhorrent.

These conflicts also explain the absolute refusal to remove Santa Monica as a homeless destination as that would cross Los Angeles County policies for which Ms. Torosis is a key employee of one of the supervisors. This one issue is the cause of the collapse of Santa Monica’s visitor economy, for which this Council has no actual plan to stabilize and re-establish permanent economic (and City revenue) growth. This Council never requests economic analyses of any issue prior to voting to ensure maximum flexibility in meeting its financial supporters’ demands and to ensure that the ineffectiveness or counter-productive outcomes of its public-relations-driven “policies” are never scrutinized.

The insane residential densification endlessly promoted by the terminally conflicted Mr. Zwick, and supported by Mr. Hall, Mr. Snell, Ms. Zernitskaya, Ms. Torosis, and Mr. Raskin, is a looming, and major, contributor to the City’s long-term financial ruin since residential development is a net cost driver to the City and the City’s ongoing revenues cannot even keep pace (due to the cratered economy) with existing operating cost challenges. Eliminating commercial infrastructure like parking lots wipes out businesses and permanently ensures that there can be no commercial recovery. But this Council clearly does not care since that will be some future Council’s (and residents’) problem.

Regarding the issue at hand, the December 8, 2025 FPPC ruling that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition requires that all votes relating to the Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A, be voided.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
24 This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Marc L. Verville
Sunset Park
Former Chair, Santa Monica Audit Subcommittee
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
25 David Yakobson
From: David Thomsen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:55 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 25 years, drawn here by the quiet, tree-lined streets and the family-friendly atmosphere. However, I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to change Santa Monica forever. This ordinance goes beyond the already expansive limits set by state law, SB1123, and the implications could be devastating for our neighborhoods.

Allowing three-story buildings with significantly increased floor area and reduced setbacks is unnecessary and could transform our beloved community into something unrecognizable. We should not be rushing this process—these kinds of decisions require thoughtful consideration and ample opportunity for community input, which we simply haven’t had.

The density being proposed is not synonymous with affordability, and we must carefully consider how this will impact safety, evacuation capacity, and our already strained infrastructure. This is not what we, as voters, envisioned when we elected you to represent our interests.

I urge you to hit pause on this ordinance and reconsider its implications for our neighborhoods. We need a plan that prioritizes community input and the wellbeing of our residents. Let’s ensure that Santa Monica remains a place we can cherish for generations to come.

Please do not send this ordinance forward.

David Thomsen
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
26 David Yakobson
From: LOUISE DECORDOBA <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:55 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Louise Decordoba
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
27 David Yakobson
From: LOUISE DECORDOBA <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:55 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Louise Decordoba
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
28 David Yakobson
From: Cathy Larson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:59 AM
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
I urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, due to the FPPC’s ruling that has disqualified Councilmember Zwick’s participation and vote.

Thank you,
Cathy Larson
Sunset Park Resident

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
29 David Yakobson
From: Lynda Dorf <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:00 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Lynda Dorf
32nd Street Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
30 David Yakobson
From: Lynda Dorf <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:01 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Lynda Dorf
32nd St. Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
31 David Yakobson
From: Lynda Dorf <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:01 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Lynda Dorf
32nd Street Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
32 David Yakobson
From: Shank, Jonathan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:01 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Jonathan Shank
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
33 David Yakobson
From: Aleese Orr <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:01 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: Oliver Chi; councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to withdraw Item 11C - Full Investigation and Evaluation

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to express my deep frustration about the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to transform my beloved North of Montana neighborhood into something unrecognizable. Having lived here for six years, I chose this area for its quiet charm and the beauty of the trees and open spaces—elements that provide a breath of fresh air amidst the chaos of Los Angeles.

The idea of allowing three-story buildings with reduced setbacks feels unnecessary and excessive. This isn't about creating affordability; density doesn’t equate to better living conditions. It’s hard to believe that such a significant change is being rushed through without meaningful input from residents like me.

We deserve a process that reflects our community's values, not one that sidesteps our voices.

We shouldn’t be going beyond state law when it comes to zoning. This isn’t what Santa Monicans voted for when they elected this Council. It’s vital that we consider the implications of increased density on safety, evacuation capacity, and our infrastructure.

I urge you to roll back this ordinance before it goes to the Planning Commission. We must take a step back and ensure that any changes truly reflect the needs and desires of our community.

Please reconsider this approach. Santa Monica deserves better.

Respectfully,
Aleese Orr
308 Alta Ave
310-729-2483
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
34 David Yakobson
From: Shank, Jonathan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:02 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Jonathan Shank
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
35 David Yakobson
From: Shank, Jonathan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:02 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Jonathan Shank
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
36 David Yakobson
From: Tuvya Zaretsky <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:03 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Negrete and City Councilmembers,
I write today to urge you all to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

If you simply ratify these compromised votes I assure that I and other Santa Monica residents will not be satisfied that public trust is restored.

I request that the City Council take the following reasonable actions:
• Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void
• Allow items to return for consideration ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them.
• Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process.

I believe our Santa Monica community deserves decisions affecting us all be made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Tuvya Zaretsky
32nd Street, Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
37 David Yakobson
From: lisa margolis <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:11 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Fwd: 11-C

EXTERNAL
>
> I live in Sunset Park and I oppose allowing 3 stories. There is already too much congestion in the area and this will make things worse. The traffic starting at 3 o’clock makes it almost impossible to get out of the neighborhood. > Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
38 David Yakobson
From: Kathy Knight <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 11:15 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
We are deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in our neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Kathy Knight and Joe Faris
Sunset Park Residents for 30 years
[email protected]
(310) 450-5961
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Victor Fresco <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:25 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Void Conflict Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void

2. Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them

3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Victor Fresco
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: Ellen Mark <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:25 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Void Conflic-Tainted Votes and Require Clean ProcessDear Mayor and City Councilmembers, I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated. The FPPC ...

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void

2. Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them

3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ellen Mark
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 David Yakobson
From: Barbara Abrams <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:25 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Barbara Abrams
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 David Yakobson
From: Levin, Amy C <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:26 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Amy Levin
*****************************************
Amy Levin, LCSW, PhD
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 David Yakobson
From: Victor Fresco <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:26 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - Don't exceed state law

Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica residents and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Victor Fresco
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 David Yakobson
From: LINDA KNAB <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:26 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor,
The upzoning of 2644 30th needs to be immediately rescinded until there is a very thorough investigation into the recently uncovered conflicts of interest of city council members with large developers who had a multimillion/billion interest in the council approve the upzoning for this project approved. This benefits the developers with the tremendous financial gain they will receive, not the residents of this neighborhood, whose quality of life will be forever adversely effected by this development. The council needs to vote for the residents not the developers
I urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest.

Sincerely,
Linda Reinbold
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 David Yakobson
From: Victor Fresco <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:26 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th St

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Councilmembers,
I to urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest.

Sincerely,
Victor Fresco
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 David Yakobson
From: Brian ONeil <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:28 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Brian O’Neil
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 David Yakobson
From: Ellen Mark <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:28 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW Importance: High

Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica residents and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerrely,
Ellen Mark
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
10 David Yakobson
From: Brendan Kelly <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:28 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for five years, and one of the reasons I chose this neighborhood was the strong sense of community. I wanted my three young kids to grow up in a place where they could walk to school and play in the park, surrounded by friendly neighbors. However, I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could forever change the fabric of our city.

Three-story buildings are simply unnecessary for our residential neighborhoods, outside of the main thoroughfares (Ocean Park, Lincoln, Pico, etc). This rushed process feels deeply unsettling and is not how significant zoning changes should be handled. It seems like the council is moving forward without fully considering the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and the increased demands on our infrastructure.

We can’t just add density without understanding the repercussions it brings. This is not what we voted for when we elected you to represent us. I urge you to reconsider this ordinance and not send it to the Planning Commission. It is essential that you listen to the voices of the residents who call Santa Monica home. Please roll this back and prioritize our community’s well-being over hasty decisions that could alter our neighborhoods irreversibly.

Let’s keep Santa Monica the vibrant, safe, and walkable place that we all cherish.

Thank you,
Brendan Kelly
2343 Ashland Avenue
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
11 David Yakobson
From: Erick Brownstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:30 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void

2. Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them

3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Erick Brownstein
1624 Oak Street, 90405
-----------------------------
@ErickB
M: 323 640 9690
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
12 David Yakobson
From: Gavin Scott <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:31 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Cc: Nicola Scott
Subject: Agenda Item 11 C

EXTERNAL
Dear councilors
My wife and I wish to protest very strongly against the proposal to allow three story buildings with 50% more area.

None of this is required by the state and there are no protections against side-by-side lots which could easily become multi-lot three story complexes.

There is no evidence any of this is necessary - state law already enables streamlined subdivision and density.

It goes far beyond what is required and maybe irreversible.

Please say no to 3 stories say and any 50% increase in floor area.

The future of the city depends on you - please do the right thing by the people who elected you.

Yours sincerely,
Gavin and Nicola Scott,
1801 Marine St,
Santa Monica 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
13 David Yakobson
From: Erick Brownstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:31 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica residents and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Erick Brownstein
1624 Oak St, 90405
-----------------------------
@ErickB
M: 323 640 9690
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
14 David Yakobson
From: Erick Brownstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:31 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Erick Brownstein
1624 Oak St, 90405
-----------------------------
@ErickB
M: 323 640 9690
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
15 David Yakobson
From: Erin Donley <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:33 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Jesse Zwick / Withdraw Item 11C

EXTERNAL
Hello,
As you are well aware, our City Manager, Oliver Chi, has identified five housing-related items that Council member Zwick voted on after he started his HAC job, and has put them under a single agenda item (11C) to be voted on this Tuesday.

While residents / voters agree that these votes were tainted by Zwick's conflict of interest and need to be reconsidered, there are additional items which Zwick participated in that should also be reconsidered in light of his conflict of interest. Additionally, some of the items were proposed or moved by Zwick and should not be voted on again unless a non-conflicted Councilmember motions for them to be voted on. And there also may be other Councilmember conflicts which would further call into question the validity of more housing-related items.

Further, a recent Freedom of Information request shows that Zwick was texting with a member of the housing group HCHC during a Council meeting to get advice on what position he should take in the face of public opposition (see article in the Santa Monica Daily Press: New Questions Emerge Over Councilmember Conflicts). This kind of ex parte communication is illegal under the Brown Act.

Taken together, it's clear that there is a tangled web of conflicts and housing votes which requires much more time and consideration than a cursory re-vote on the five items listed under 11C. These and other items should be investigated by the City Attorney before any re-votes are taken.

PLEASE listen to the residents / voters. We ate urging the withdrawal TONIGHT of Item 11C until the matter can be accurately investigated and evaluated.

Thank you
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
16 Erin Donley
1208 Broadway
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
17 David Yakobson
From: Sheryl Zucker <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:33 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers, I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift. The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability.

It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions. We don’t need to go to three stories. We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5. We don’t need reduced setbacks. We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance. Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city. Sincerely, (Name)
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
18 David Yakobson
From: Sheryl Zucker <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:34 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust. I request that the City Council:

Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves. Thank you. Sincerely, [Name]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
19 David Yakobson
From: Kathleen von Schlegell <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:35 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’m writing as a longtime resident of Sunset Park, where I've lived for 35 years and have developed a deep appreciation for our community and its walkable neighborhoods. I’m genuinely concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to transform Santa Monica in ways that go far beyond what our state law, SB1123, requires.

This rushed process raises serious red flags. The scale of these changes, allowing three-story buildings and increasing the floor area limits by 50%, seems to disregard the input and concerns of those of us who call this city home. It feels like a significant departure from what Santa Monicans voted for when they elected you. Adding density does not equate to affordability, and we can’t overlook the implications this change would have on our safety, evacuation capacity, and the demands on our infrastructure.

I urge you to reconsider this ordinance before it goes any further. It’s crucial to pause, engage in meaningful dialogue with residents, and truly assess the long-term impacts on our neighborhoods. Please don’t send this ordinance forward; let’s work together to ensure Santa Monica remains a vibrant, community-focused city.

Thank you.

Kathleen von Schlegell
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
20 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Rosenblum <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:37 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Nancy Rosenblum
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
21 David Yakobson
From: karen Ginsberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:39 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
We have lived in Sunset Park for 29 years. We chose this neighborhood for its walkable, tree-lined streets and the proximity to schools within the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District. We want to express a deep concern about the proposed zoning ordinance that could irrevocably change our beloved community.

This new ordinance goes far beyond what is necessary under state law. Allowing three-story buildings and increasing floor area limits by 50% is not only excessive but risks densifying our neighborhoods to the point of being no longer recognizable. We shouldn’t rush into such significant changes without thorough community input. This isn't what we voted for when we elected you as Council members.

Moreover, we must consider the implications of increased density on safety, evacuation capacity, and our existing infrastructure.

We urge you to roll back this proposed ordinance and ensure it doesn’t move forward. The City’s residents deserve a process that is transparent and inclusive.

Thank you for considering our concerns.

Robert and Karen Ginsberg

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
22 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Rosenblum <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:41 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely

NANCY ROSENBLUM
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
23 David Yakobson
From: Jeanne Eisenman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:41 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Jeanne Eisenman
Get Outlook for Android
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
24 David Yakobson
From: Jeanne Eisenman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:42 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Jeanne Eisenman
Get Outlook for Android
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
25 David Yakobson
From: Jeanne Eisenman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:44 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Jeanne Eisenman
Get Outlook for Android
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
26 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Rosenblum <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:47 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely

NANCY ROSENBLUM
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
27 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:54 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Jaron, Ken, Kana and Mari LeBlanc
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
28 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:55 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Jaron, Kana, Ken and Mari LeBlanc
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
29 David Yakobson
From: Wendy Yip <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:57 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Wendy Yip
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
30 David Yakobson
From: Wendy Yip <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:57 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Wendy Yip
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
31 David Yakobson
From: Patty Briggs <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:00 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Patty Briggs, Sunset Park homeowner/taxpayer
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
32 David Yakobson
From: barbanell <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:00 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Heidi von Tongeln; Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Subject: OPPOSITION to 11C: Ratification of Previously Discredited Votes on the January 13, 2026, Santa Monica City Council Agenda

EXTERNAL
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Dan Hall <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Cc: Oliver Chi <[email protected]>, Heidi von Tongeln <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Nina Fresco <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
From: Jerry Bass & Stephanie Barbanell/Santa Monica
Re: Subject: OPPOSITION to 11C: Ratification of Previously Discredited Votes on the January 13, 2026, Santa Monica City Council Agenda
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
“Hard proof exists of an alignment between some of our local elected officials and the development industry.”
Specifically, there is overwhelming evidence that Councilman Zwick has a gross conflict of interest and a pro developer bias, such that ALL the decisions he was involved in, as outlined by numerous neighborhood groups, are TAINTED and must be vacated.

Santa Monica’s reputation is already tarnished by rising crime and safety issues, let’s not add CORRUPTION .

ZWICK’S FAILURE TO RECUSE HIMSELF, means all decisions he was involved in must be revoted upon.

Zwick must resign or be removed from office for his violation of public trust! Sincerely,
Jerry Bass & Stephanie Barbanell, Santa Monica residents since 1983 Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
33 David Yakobson
From: Patty Briggs <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:01 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Patty Briggs, Sunset Park homeowner/ taxpayer
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
34 David Yakobson
From: Christine Parra <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:04 AM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Christine Parra
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
35 David Yakobson
From: maritta&patrick <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:06 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: No 3 Stories! No 460 Units on Ocean Park!

EXTERNAL
We are Santa Monica residents and voters. We are against 3 stories and very against the proposed 460 units on the other side of Clover Park. Ocean Park Blvd is already a traffic nightmare.

No!
Patrick Percy
Maritta Tapanainen
2452 Oak St B
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
36 David Yakobson
From: dana abrams <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:09 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members, I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 50 years, and this community holds countless memories for me, especially the simple joy of walking to the beach. It’s a cherished place where families thrive, and I’m deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could forever alter its fabric.

We shouldn't be going beyond what state law allows. The idea of three-story buildings is simply unnecessary for our neighborhoods, and it feels like a rushed decision that doesn’t allow for adequate input from those who truly know and care about this community. This isn’t just about adding density; it’s essential to consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and the infrastructure we currently have in place. This isn’t what I, or many others, voted for when we elected you. We deserve a thoughtful approach that truly reflects our community’s needs and values, not a hasty ordinance that could lead to irreversible changes. I urge you to roll back this proposal and prioritize the voices of the residents of Santa Monica. Let’s work together to ensure we build a future that respects our neighborhoods rather than reshapes them without consideration. Please do not send this ordinance forward. Dana Abrams Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
37 David Yakobson
From: Karen Melick <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda item 11.C Please do not adopt or approve items 2 and 3, approve item 5

EXTERNAL
While it's good that some of the items that Jesse Zwick significantly influenced and voted for while he had a conflict of interest are being reviewed, these and other housing/zoning items he voted on should not be adopted or approved without having a full review. Unfortunately, it's impossible to un-ring the bell and undo the influence that Jesse had in the discussions and votes for these items.

As the staff report says, the FPPC advice is forward-looking only and does not issue opinions on past actions. Thus the next statement in the staff report that says that the FPPC did not find that Mayor Pro Tem Zwick acted improperly, violated the law or failed to disclose his employment, is true but misleading as just previously stated, that isn't what the FPPC does. Since they determined that it is improper for him to be involved with housing production decisions in the future, it's obvious that his involvement in the past decisions since his employment involvement with HAC were also improper. It's up to the State Attorney General and the LA County District Attorney to determine if the law was violated.

Please do not approve the resolution to direct the Planning Commission to initiate the process of amending the zoning ordinance to go beyond what's required with SB1123. This does not directly help affordable housing in Santa Monica. In fact, by incentivizing developers above SB1123 standards, the modest and lower cost houses in R-1 areas will be replaced with predominantly luxury condominiums and apartments. This will decimate the availability of the lowest cost and most affordable single family homes in Santa Monica, which are already in low supply.

Please approve item 5, the repeal of the (unlawful) Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance that tried to implement these zoning changes that are above what are required by the state.

Please also rescind the upzoning at 2644 30th Street. Council member Zwick made the motions to approve both the rezoning on September 30, after he accepted his position, and the limited covenant on October 14, 2025. Due to his conflict of interest, these quasi-judicial decisions should be invalidated and the City cannot simply re-vote on these items.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Karen Melick
Sunset Park resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
38 David Yakobson
From: Mindi Shank <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:15 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process. Do the right thing!!

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust. It is an effort to brush this corruption all under the rug. It’s near impossible to see Councilmember Zwick’s conflict as an accident and not intentional.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Mindi Shank
2525 29th Street
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
39 David Yakobson
From: Robert Mickelson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:17 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I've lived in Sunset Park for 30 years, and I moved here because it’s a safe, family-friendly neighborhood. My kids could walk and ride their bikes to school without worrying about heavy traffic. But now, I’m deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to change everything I love about our community.

This new ordinance goes far beyond state law and would allow three-story buildings in our residential areas. We shouldn't be pushing boundaries like this—especially when it isn't necessary. The rushed process surrounding this ordinance leaves little room for meaningful input from residents, which is simply unacceptable. We deserve a transparent conversation about the future of our neighborhoods.

Density does not equate to affordability, and adding more housing without understanding the implications on safety and infrastructure is reckless. This isn’t what we voted for when we elected you to represent us. We want to maintain the charm and safety of Santa Monica.

Please reconsider moving this ordinance forward. I urge you to roll it back and prioritize our community’s wellbeing over rushed decisions that could have irreversible consequences. Let’s work together to find solutions that truly serve our residents.

Thank you for considering my concerns.

Best,
Robert Mickelson
3204 Pearl Street
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
40 David Yakobson
From: Mindi Shank <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:17 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW.

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
Please save our city from over densification!
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Mindi Shank
2525 29th Street
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
41 David Yakobson
From: Mindi Shank <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:18 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Mindi Shank
2525 29th Street
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
42 David Yakobson
From: rosindabow <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 10:27 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I have lived in Sunset Park for 28 wonderful years, drawn here by the warm, friendly neighbors and a strong sense of community. My family has grown up surrounded by local eateries, parks, and vibrant farmer’s markets, where we’ve shared countless birthdays and holidays with lifelong friends. It’s this intimacy that makes Santa Monica feel like home.

I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow new housing projects to escalate to three stories, with density that could overwhelm our beloved neighborhoods. This isn’t just a minor adjustment; it’s a leap beyond what state law permits, and it’s happening without the careful consideration it deserves. This process has been rushed, limiting meaningful input from residents like me, who are deeply concerned about the implications of such changes on safety and infrastructure.

Let’s be clear: it's my understanding that adding density doesn’t equate to affordability. We must prioritize the health and well-being of our community over developers’ interests. We urge you to Vote NO.

Let’s make Santa Monica better for ALL our residents. A developer's Yes vote would forever change the beauty of our wonderful city, our home, our SANTA MONICA.

Please reconsider and roll back this ordinance before it’s too late.

Respectfully,
Ross Levinson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: irena mendez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:24 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Halina Mendez
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: greg chasen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:13 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Items 10.A and 11.C

Sincerely,
Greg Chasen
1318 10th St.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 David Yakobson
From: Lindsay Gibson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:14 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Items 10.A and 11.C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Council,
I support housing, and I support the Council members who are taking action to deliver it.

I am writing to express my support for Agenda Items 10.A and 11.C and for the Council’s continued efforts to make it easier to build all kinds of housing in Santa Monica. Removing barriers to housing production is essential if our city is to meet unmet demand, welcome new neighbors, and revitalize the local economy for the future.

Thank you for your leadership and commitment to Santa Monica’s long-term success.

Sincerely,
Lindsay Gibson
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 David Yakobson
From: Jacob Pierce <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:12 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick
Cc: councilmtgitems; Scott Epstein
Subject: Strong support for 10.A and 11.C (Offsite Affordable Housing Program and SB 1123 implementation)
Attachments: AHLA - Off-site Affordble, SB 1123 affirmations.pdf

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and members of the Santa Monica City Council, Abundant Housing LA writes with support for two items your body has already supported, the Offsite Affordable Housing Program and the efficacious implementation of SB 1123.

These are items from 10.A and 11.C, respectively, on tonight's agenda. Your efforts are making it easier to build all kinds of housing in Santa Monica, and these steps are essential to continuing your work to advance a more equitable, affordable and economically vibrant city. Our full letter is attached.

Thank you,
Jacob Pierce
Housing Elements & Policy Analyst
Abundant Housing LA
@jacobpierceLA
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1/12/2026
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica CA 90401
Subject: Support for Items 10.A and 11.C
Dear Mayor Torosis and members of the Santa Monica City Council, Abundant Housing LA writes with support for two items your body has already supported, the Offsite Affordable Housing Program and the efficacious implementation of SB 1123.

Together, these items represent a critical step in addressing Santa Monica’s housing shortage, and it is imperative that you continue to lead on this issue. Abundant Housing LA strongly supports these programs, which serve invaluable and related ends in efforts to advance justice and inclusion in the community and beyond. The Off-Site Affordable Housing Program (10.A) ensures the feasibility of multifamily housing construction at multiple levels of affordability. We encourage you to, again, extend and expand the Off-site Affordable Housing Pilot Program.

The SB 1123 item (11.C) implements state law to legalize small-lot starter homes to create more for-sale missing-middle housing, with an additional provision to allow accessory dwelling units.

This program must be properly calibrated to ensure projects on vacant single-family parcels are both legally permitted and also financially and physically feasible. We respectfully urge you to adopt the staff recommendations.

These steps are essential to continuing your work to advance a more equitable and affordable Santa Monica.

Thank you,
Azeen Khanmalek
Executive Director
Abundant Housing LA
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 David Yakobson
From: Dustin Shahan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:25 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Items 10.A and 11.C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Council,
I support housing, and I support the Council members who are taking action to deliver it.

Thank you for your leadership and commitment to Santa Monica’s long-term success.

Sincerely,
Dustin Shahan
90401
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 David Yakobson
From: Ali F <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:41 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; councilmtgitems
Subject: Support for Items 10.A and 11.C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Council, I support housing, and I support the Council members who are taking action to deliver it. I am writing to express my support for Agenda Items 10.A and 11.C and for the Council’s continued efforts to make it easier to build all kinds of housing in Santa Monica. Removing barriers to housing production is essential if our city is to meet unmet demand, welcome new neighbors, and revitalize the local economy for the future. Thank you for your leadership and commitment to Santa Monica’s long-term success. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Santa Monica Resident / Voter] Best,
Ali
Ali Fallahassady
310.591.9172
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Faustino Garza <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:00 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Faustino Garza
1351 Pacific Street
Santa Monica 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: Ann Hoover <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:02 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Caroline Torosis
Cc: Heidi von Tongeln; Susan Cola; Oliver Chi; Jing Yeo; Ross Fehrman; Rachel Kwok; Roxanne Tanemori; Cary Fukui
Subject: January 13, 2026 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ann Bowman
Resident, 29 years
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 David Yakobson
From: Amanda Enclade <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:02 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I urge the City Council to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated despite a disqualifying conflict of interest.

The rezoning from R1 to Neighborhood Commercial allows substantially larger development, including housing projects up to 85 feet tall through state density bonus provisions. The FPPC has determined that Councilmember Zwick was legally disqualified from participating in housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. Nevertheless, he made the motions to approve both the rezoning on September 30, 2025 and the related limited covenant on October 14, 2025.

Because these actions were taken by a conflicted councilmember, the approvals are invalid under California law. As established in Petrovich v. City of Sacramento, participation by a disqualified official in a quasi judicial decision invalidates the entire action. The City therefore cannot cure this defect through ratification or a simple revote: the original approvals are void.

Given that this rezoning also conflicts with the City’s General Plan, raises environmental compliance concerns, and is already subject to litigation, I respectfully request that the Council rescind this invalid upzoning in full.

Sincerely,
Amanda Enclade
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 David Yakobson
From: LINDA KNAB <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:04 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
Santa Monica Residents deserve a thorough investigation into any conflict of interest of all city employees before any housing policy is brought before the city council for a vote. SM residents deserve a transparent government.

I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Linda Reinbold
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 David Yakobson
From: Elyse Eberstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:17 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Elyse Bennett
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 David Yakobson
From: Elyse Eberstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:18 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Elyse Bennett
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 David Yakobson
From: Elyse Eberstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:18 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Elyse
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:20 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Agenda Item Number 11-C
From: Richard Daum <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 6:26 AM
To: Council Mailbox <[email protected]>; Dan Hall <[email protected]>; Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Ellis Raskin <[email protected]>; Barry Snell <[email protected]>; Caroline Torosis <[email protected]>; Natalya Zernitskaya <[email protected]>; Jesse Zwick <[email protected]>; Santa Monica City Manager's Office <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item Number 11-C

EXTERNAL
I'm sensing a lack of vision from our City Council.

Where is your Master Plan on how Santa Monica will look architecturally? How is development tied into upgrading of infrastructure? How is development tied into traffic patterns?
Has anyone determined how many people can be sustained by our present water supply.

Richard Daum
[email protected]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:20 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest Honorable Mayor, City Attorn From: Gary Freedman <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 5:41 AM
To: Council Mailbox <[email protected]>; Attorney Mailbox <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: Oliver Chi <[email protected]>
Subject: Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest Honorable Mayor, City Attorn

EXTERNAL
Cc: [email protected], [email protected] We are residents writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law.

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

We request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Donna and Gary Freedman
533 9th Street
Santa Monica, CA
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
10 Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
11 David Yakobson
From: irena mendez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:24 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Halina Mendez
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
12 David Yakobson
From: Amy <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:24 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
[Name]
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Jamie Grossman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 4:53 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Santa Monica Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: Paula Goldman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 4:54 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Agenda item 11 C (2): NO on interim zoning ordinance

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
Please vote AGAINST the second part of Agenda Item 11C, the unnecessary and poorly thought-out interim zoning ordinance that expands on SB 1123.

NO OTHER city in California is doing this; SB 1123 is already a drastic reimagining of neighborhoods. The Planning Commission hasn’t had time to discuss this. This goes WAY beyond what the State is asking. Why would you want this? Why wouldn’t you wait to see what our town looks like post-SB 1123 before adding unnecessary and irreversible changes? How will you manage the additional infrastructure demands? Please vote NO on this ordinance that was conjured up by special interests.

Thank you.

Paula Goldman and Brian Wolf
2821 Washington Avenue
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 David Yakobson
From: Sheryl Zucker <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 4:56 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council: We are a coalition of Santa Monica residents and business owners writing to request that the Council void the December 17, 2025 DDAs with Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and restart the process in compliance with California law. On December 17, 2025, Item 11.A was approved via motion by Councilmember Zwick. On January 9, 2026 an article in the Santa Monica Daily Press outlined conflicts of interest and ethics violations with council members who voted for Hollywood Community Housing Corporation DDA. On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v. City of Sacramento (2001) confirms that participation by a single conflicted decision-maker invalidates the entire action. The proper remedy is not a revote, it is a restart from the point of violation. I request that the Council: 1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich 2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused 3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments 4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust. Respectfully submitted,
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 David Yakobson
From: Ann Haggart <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 4:59 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause

11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Ann Gilbertson Haggart
2108 Hill St
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 David Yakobson
From: Yollanda Ziff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:05 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to convey my significant apprehension regarding the proposed zoning ordinance, which I believe poses a profound threat to the integrity of Sunset Park. Having cherished our community for decades, I am deeply troubled by changes that would fundamentally transform its established character.

The introduction of three-story buildings across our neighborhoods, exceeding state requirements, feels both unnecessary and premature. This rapid advancement of such a consequential plan, without adequate citizen engagement, overlooks crucial considerations like our existing infrastructure, public safety, and evacuation capacities. The notion that higher density automatically equates to affordability is questionable and does not justify imposing such a dramatic redefinition on our residential areas.

This initiative appears to diverge from the community's aspirations and the mandate entrusted to this council. I implore you to reconsider this course of action, halting the ordinance's progression. Let us instead focus on collaborative solutions that genuinely serve the long-term well-being and unique appeal of Sunset Park.

Sincerely,
Yollanda Ziff
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 David Yakobson
From: Jill Foley <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:06 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Jill Vasquez Foley
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 David Yakobson
From: Rob Ross <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:07 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I have lived in Sunset Park for thirty years, drawn here by the promise of a quiet, family-oriented neighborhood and the excellent Santa Monica Public Schools. The charm of our one- and two-story homes has been a source of pride, but I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could irreversibly change everything I cherish about our community.

Allowing three-story buildings with a 50% increase in floor area and smaller setbacks is unnecessary and reckless.

We shouldn’t be going beyond state law, especially when this rushed process has left little room for meaningful public input. Density does not equate to affordability, and these changes pose serious questions about safety, evacuation capacity, and the strain on our already taxed infrastructure.

This is not what we envisioned when we elected our council. We need to take a step back, reconsider the implications of such drastic changes, and prioritize the wellbeing of our neighborhoods. I urge you to roll back this zoning ordinance and stop it from moving forward. Let’s work together to find solutions that truly serve our community without compromising its essence.

Please listen to the voices of those who call Santa Monica home.

Thank you, Rob Ross
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 David Yakobson
From: Raymond Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
We have lived in the Northeast for over 30 years, and cannot believe the idea of the proposed zoning ordinance. This plan to allow three-story buildings in our neighborhoods goes far beyond what state law requires. It is a complete disrespect of our community.

The process has been rushed and is not normal for such significant changes. This isn't what we voted for when we elected you. Density does not make affordability. We can’t just build, build, build without considering the strain it will place on our environment and daily lives.

We need our council to roll back this unrequired ordinance. Preserve the integrity of Santa Monica before it’s too late.

I urge you to listen to the voices of the community and stop this ordinance.

Thank you,
Raymond and Nadina Johnson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 David Yakobson
From: Dannie Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:14 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Danielle Charney
[
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
10 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: SB1123
Attachments: 26.01.12_SB1123_Opposition_Letter_to_City Council.pdf

EXTERNAL
Please consider my letter opposing SB1123.

Thank you,

JACK HILLBRAND, ARCHITECT
PRESIDENT, STUDIO1323 Inc.

AIA | NCARB | CAB-SME | LEED
Cell: (415) 710-4702
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 January 12, 2026
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Opposition to SB 1123 Interim Zoning Ordinance - Request for Deferral and Reconsideration
Dear City Councilmembersl:

As an architect and a professional with decades of experience in sustainable residential design and urban planning in Santa Monica, I write to express strong opposition to the proposed SB 1123 Interim Zoning Ordinance (IZO) and to request that the Council either oppose this measure outright or, at minimum, defer consideration until the new year to allow for proper analysis and community engagement.

Exceeding State Law Requirements Without Justification
SB 1123 requires only that cities permit subdivision of certain residential parcels.

However, the proposed ordinance goes dramatically beyond this mandate by:
• Raising R1 neighborhood heights from two stories to three stories • Permitting multiple additional ADUs beyond the subdivision requirements • Significantly increasing Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allowances • Waiving affordable housing fees and production requirements None of these provisions are required by state law. As an architectural professional who regularly navigates state and local building codes, I can confirm that the base requirements of SB 1123 already represent substantial densification. There is no evidence-based rationale for exceeding these requirements before we understand their impacts.

Absence of Professional Planning Analysis
As someone who regularly prepares visual impact studies and neighborhood compatibility analyses for residential projects, I am deeply concerned that city staff has provided no:
• Visual simulations showing the cumulative impact of three-story development in R1 zones
• Shadow studies demonstrating effects on adjacent properties • Infrastructure capacity analysis for utilities and parking • Fire safety and emergency access evaluations for increased density The Commission's own members have acknowledged lacking sufficient information to understand the implications of this ordinance. This is not acceptable for changes of this magnitude.

Violation of Established Planning Process
The existing R1 development standards were created through months of careful work by this Planning Commission with extensive community engagement. This proposed ordinance effectively rewrites those standards without:
• Proper notification to affected neighborhoods (Pico, Sunset Park, NOMA, Northeast) • Community workshops or design charrettes
• Environmental review under CEQA
• Consideration of alternative approaches that might achieve housing goals with less neighborhood disruption
As Planning Commissioners have noted, these changes may be irreversible once implemented.

The permanent transformation of established neighborhoods demands thorough deliberation, not rushed adoption.

The Affordable Housing Paradox
Most troubling is the proposal to waive affordable housing fees and production requirements. If the stated goal is housing affordability, eliminating the very mechanisms that create affordable units is counterproductive. This provision benefits developers at the expense of our community's housing needs and contradicts the City's own Housing Element commitments.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 Recommendations
I respectfully urge the City Councilmembers to:

1. Oppose the current SB 1123 IZO as drafted, recommending that the City Council limit implementation to only what state law requires

2. If unable to oppose outright, defer consideration until the new year to allow for:
• Preparation of proper visual impact analyses
• Community outreach to affected neighborhoods
• Study of infrastructure and emergency service impacts • Analysis of whether base SB 1123 requirements achieve intended goals

3. Require retention of all affordable housing fees and production requirements Through the Planning Commission, the Council has both the responsibility and the authority to ensure that zoning changes undergo proper review. This ordinance represents one of the most significant rezoning efforts in recent Santa Monica history, affecting thousands of residents and property owners. It deserves the same careful consideration that created our existing standards, not a rushed process that bypasses established planning principles.

Thank you for your consideration of these concerns.

Respectfully submitted,
Jack Hillbrand AIA, Architect
President, Studio1323 Inc.

Santa Monica Landmarks Commission Architect
1323 18th Street Santa Monica, CA 90404
EM: [email protected]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
11 David Yakobson
From: Dannie Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:14 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Danielle Charney
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
12 David Yakobson
From: Dannie Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:14 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
[Danielle Charney
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
13 David Yakobson
From: Dannie Charney <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:20 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi; Heidi von Tongeln; Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Subject: OPPOSITION to 11C: Ratification of Previously Discredited Votes on the January 13, 2026, Santa Monica City Council Agenda

EXTERNAL
I COULD NOT SAY THIS BETTER...

SO SENDING THEIR LETTER AGAIN.. In addition - Zwick needs to resign... tonight... he should be joined by Caroline, Natalya and Dan.. enough is enough of all this entitlement and lack of transparency and out and out lies.

Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers,
We strongly urge the City Council to OPPOSE Agenda Item 11 C “Consideration of Certain Prior Housing-Production Related Votes and Repeal of Interim Zoning Regulations Related to Projects Utilizing State Law for Small Lot Subdivisions and Duplexes and Lot Splits on Parcels Zoned for Single-Unit Residential” scheduled for re-vote on Tuesday, January 13, 2026.

We urge you to vote NO on these “re-votes” AND come together to start over to conduct an unbiased and unconflicted process.

Our unity on this matter reflects widespread concern about both the substance and the process behind these policies.

These items tainted with conflicts of interest (COI) return to the agenda solely because the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) determined that Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated in these votes while holding a disqualifying financial conflict of interest. The COI is Mr. Zwick’s employment and role at HAC is to advocate for other cities to pass the same housing-specific zoning changes, that in many cases, he voted on as an elected Council Member of the city of Santa Monica.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
14 As confirmed by the FPPC Advice Letter (No. A-25-153) issued on December 8, 2025, Councilmember Zwick’s employment with the Housing Action Coalition (HAC) created a "nexus" conflict, rendering him ineligible to vote on housing production decisions.

However, the procedural concerns extend beyond Councilmember Zwick's vote in favor of each item. The majority of these items were proposed, motioned, or seconded by him - meaning someone with a now-confirmed conflict of interest, which disqualified him from participating, played a central role in bringing them forward and building support by participating in the discussion.

Simply “ratifying” or re-confirming these items will undermine public trust in fair governance.

Renters and homeowners alike are affected by these housing policies, and will all live with the consequences of decisions that were made by a councilmember with disqualifying financial conflict of interests. That is why the City Council should act to void the previous votes and only bring back the items if an eligible councilmember makes a motion and it is seconded. Only then, can Santa Monica housing policy be crafted without the tainted and compromised process that previously took place.

We are MOST concerned because these compromised votes steered Santa Monica away from affordability and from YOUR responsibility to uphold the Santa Monica City Charter. Specifically, the City Council must at all times, by ordinance, require that no less than 30% of all new multifamily residential housing is permanently affordable to and occupied by low- and moderate-income households. As you well know, this requirement was established by voters through the passage of Proposition R in 1990.

As an example of the tainted outcome of the process inappropriately and significantly influenced by Mr. Zwick’s disqualifying COI, the Off-site Affordable Housing Pilot Program, incentivizes market-rate housing with less than 10% affordable units being created. 10% affordable is 90% unaffordable! Not only does this violate Santa Monica City Charter, but this also elevates displacement risk for rent-controlled renters and undermines the economic diversity that has long defined Santa Monica.

In addition to our concern over violations of the City Charter, as our elected officials, you must care for and focus on the safety of the citizens of Santa Monica. Over the past year, Santa Monica has opened its doors to neighbors displaced by the Pacific Palisades wildfires. As we have reached the one-year anniversary of that disaster, this Council has a responsibility to lead - not just on affordability, but on safety, preparedness, and public trust. The fires were traumatic and devastating, and they laid bare that land-use decisions and government planning directly affect how communities withstand and recover from disasters.

Bringing these votes back without a comprehensive, unbiased and publicly vetted plan is irresponsible. Density decisions cannot be made in isolation, without addressing evacuation, infrastructure, emergency response, and quality-of-life impacts. Our community deserves a serious, Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
15 transparent discussion of how these policies fit into the Council’s and City Manager’s “realignment plan” - not piecemeal votes that ignore the very risks recent events laid bare.

A NO vote puts an end to the previous process that was promoted by a disqualified Councilmember to maximize the yield of special interests (which are the SAME personal interests disqualified him by the FPPC).

These five items account for a tiny fraction of all of the tainted items and policies. For you to fully understand the scope and the significance of the tainted items/policies, a full accounting and review must occur in order to identify all of the items that should come back before you. You should seek to have all of the available information before voting again.

For example, there is a significant number of Housing-Production items (see Exhibit A) and Housing-Related items (see Exhibit B) where Mr. Zwick either brought the item to the council for discussion, made the motion, or seconded it and we encourage you to vote to rescind ALL of the previous tainted votes and only bring back for discussion and a vote IF a non-disqualified member of Council moves to do so.

There are also many additional Housing-Production (see Exhibit C) and Housing-Related (see Exhibit D) items where Mr. Zwick voted, when he was disqualified and should have recused himself. We encourage you to rescind all of these votes and similarly bring them back for a full discussion and vote in an unbiased and unconflicted process.

Santa Monica deserves housing policies that prioritize residents, genuine affordability and safety. If you want the same, please vote NO and give Santa Monica a clean slate from which we can build from together.

If you feel that you need further clarity as to the scope, legal implications, and/or additional guidance on the recommended next steps, we encourage you to ask the City Attorney to conduct a full investigation and/or request an independent investigation. We encourage you to move forward once you have all of the information before you, so that you can exercise your fiduciary responsibility to our great City.

Sincerely,

DANIELLE CHARNEY
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
16 David Yakobson
From: Julie Christensen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:21 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Pause Housing Vote Ratifications and Oppose SB 1123 Local Amendments

EXTERNAL
January 12, 2026
Santa Monica City Council
City Hall
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: January 13, 2026 City Council Meeting – Request to Pause Housing Vote Ratifications and Oppose SB 1123 Local Amendments Honorable Mayor Torosis, Mayor Pro Tem Zwick, and Members of the City Council:

I am writing as a concerned Santa Monica resident to urge the Council to (1) pause all housing-related votes currently scheduled for ratification until a full assessment of Councilmember Zwick's conflict of interest can be completed, and (2) remove from consideration any local zoning amendments related to SB 1123 that exceed state requirements.

Pause on Housing Vote Ratifications
On December 8, 2025, the California Fair Political Practices Commission ruled that Councilmember Jesse Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. While the FPPC's ruling is forward-looking, it raises serious questions about the integrity of housing-related votes taken between August and September 2025.

The Council is now being asked to ratify these votes "out of an abundance of caution." However, ratifying votes that may have been tainted by a conflict of interest – without first understanding the full scope of how that conflict may have influenced Council deliberations and outcomes – does not serve the public interest.

We do not yet have a full understanding of the impact of Councilmember Zwick's conflict of interest and how it may have shaped Council decisions and votes. Rushing to ratify these items without that understanding undermines public trust in our local government.

I urge the Council to:
• Pause all housing-related votes currently scheduled for ratification • Commission an independent review to assess the full scope of the conflict and its potential impact on past Council actions • Ensure meaningful public process and transparency before any ratification votes proceed Opposition to Local SB 1123 Amendments That Exceed State Requirements State Senate Bill 1123 requires cities to ministerially approve certain housing subdivisions. Santa Monica must comply with this state law. However, the local zoning amendments currently under consideration go far beyond what state law requires.

These proposed local modifications – including increased floor area ratios up to 1.5, building heights up to three stories in single-family zones, reduced setbacks, elimination of stepback requirements, and waivers of affordable housing fees – are unnecessary changes to our Municipal Code that exceed state mandates. They should not be up for consideration.

Our Planning Commission has already raised concerns about these modifications, with commissioners noting the lack of meaningful public process and the risks of going "above and beyond" state requirements. Several commissioners expressed discomfort with waiving affordable housing fees and concerns about potential downzoning problems if these aggressive standards prove unworkable.

Santa Monica should comply with state housing law – nothing more. Local modifications that exceed state requirements should be removed from consideration entirely.

Conclusion
Residents deserve a Council they can trust to make decisions based on what is best for our city – not what benefits special interests or advances ideological agendas. The FPPC ruling has created legitimate questions about the integrity of recent housing votes. Until those questions are answered, ratification is premature.

I respectfully request that the Council:

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
17 1. Pause all housing vote ratifications pending a full independent review

2. Remove from consideration local SB 1123 amendments that exceed state requirements Thank you for your consideration and your service to our community.

Respectfully submitted,
Julie Christensen
354 23rd Street
Santa Monica, CA 90402
[email protected]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
18 David Yakobson
From: Elliot Gordon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:27 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Elliot Gordon
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
19 David Yakobson
From: Elliot Gordon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:28 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Elliot Gordon
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Bill Breslo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:21 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: NO to 3 Stories

EXTERNAL
I'll keep my message simple: 3 stories in the residential areas with a current limit of two stories, such as Sunset Park, is a BAD IDEA.

Please do not support 3 stories in these areas.

Bill Breslo
2229 25th Street
90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
20 David Yakobson
From: John Murdock <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:31 PM
To: councilmtgitems; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Nikki Kolhoff; Jeanne Laurie; Robb Curtis Brown; John Reynolds; Cathy Larson; Clare Thomas; Aliceann Grusin; Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City; [email protected]
Subject: Please do not "ratify" prior illegal actions, esp 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Greetings Councilmembers;
I am a Sunset Park resident and retired lawyer — having specialized in litigation of land use issues for decades. I am writing for myself as a taxpayer: I do not want my tax dollars wasted on the expensive litigation costs occasioned by the illegal approval of the zone change at 2644 30th street.

In addition to the fact that the action failed to comply with the municipal code requirements for a zone change, as I spelled out in detail in an earlier email, we now have the additional irregularity occasioned by councilmember Jesse Zwick's clear conflict of interest-- on a matter where he was the maker of the motion for approval.

Your prior approval of the zone change at 2644 30TH Street was in violation of the SMMC and the LUCE, not to mention CEQA. I believe that if you do not set aside the prior vote, which you now have a perfect, facesaving chance to do before a judge orders it, you will end up defending the lawsuit only to pay attorneys' fees in a losing battle-- your fees as well as the plaintiffs' fees at the conclusion. And this is all for the benefit of a private property owner who failed to participate in the public zoning process when he had a chance to cite alleged "mistakes" and ask for corrections through the appropriate public vetting process. He simply slept through that opportunity — and now gets a free pass without even complying with code requirements for a zone change? All this I find truly objectionable as a taxpayer-- and an as attorney who wants his city to do the right thing, abide by its own laws. You will only compound your mistake, and thereby increase the amount of money being wasted on legal fees, if you vote to "ratify" this ill-fated action.

I wish Jesse Zwick only the best in his new job, but he needs to make a difficult choice between that job and his seat on the Council. His heart is clearly with promoting developments to increase the housing stock, so the choice seems fairly clear to me-- as it seems to be for most of the residents of the city. He can pursue his passion for solving the housing crisis as a private lobbyist, but not as a public one. Please have a serious discussion about this in private with Mr. Zwick. He can participate fully in matters affecting the city as an informed private citizen.

John Murdock
1209 Pine Street
Santa Monica, CA 90405
tel. (310) 450-1859
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
21 David Yakobson
From: JORDAN ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:36 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Jordan Ellis
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
22 David Yakobson
From: JORDAN ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:37 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Jordan Ellis
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
23 David Yakobson
From: JORDAN ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:37 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Jordan Ellis
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
24 David Yakobson
From: Joanne Pittard <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:39 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
As a long-time resident of NOMA, where I’ve lived for over fifty years, I’m deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that aims to drastically reshape Santa Monica. I chose this neighborhood for its quiet atmosphere, single-family homes, and strong schools. But Santa Monica has changed drastically. It is being over-built and creating very dense neighborhoods. Traffic is a big issue.

Homelessness in my town is shameful.

This new ordinance goes well beyond the already-expanded limits set by SB1123. Allowing three-story buildings with significantly increased floor area and reduced setbacks is unnecessary and could forever alter our community's character. The rushed process surrounding this change is alarming, making it difficult for residents like me to voice our concerns meaningfully. We shouldn’t be expanding beyond state law without understanding the significant implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands.

Density does not equate to affordability, and this isn’t what Santa Monicans voted for when we elected you. I urge you to roll back this ordinance and not send it to the Planning Commission. Let’s prioritize the integrity of our neighborhoods and ensure that our community remains a place we can all cherish.

Thank you for considering the voices of your constituents.

Joanne D Pittard
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
25 David Yakobson
From: Louis Ssutu <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:42 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item Number 11-C

EXTERNAL

Dear City Council,

Please STOP EXCEEDING THE STATE LAWS.

NO to 3 Stories

NO to 50% Increase in Floor Area

No to Irresponsible Densification Without Public Safety and Evacuation Planning

Thank you for safeguarding all of the residents of Santa Monica....WHO VOTED FOR YOU!

Sincerely,

Louis Ssutu
Resident of Sunset Park
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
26 David Yakobson
From: Hal Bogotch <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:45 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: => Urgent Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes & Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor & City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

The FPPC confirmed that Mr. Zwick held a disqualifying conflict of interest—his employer has been advocating for the exact policies he voted on. He proposed motions, voted, and/or seconded proposals while he should have been completely disqualified from participating.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I hereby request that the City Council:
 Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void.
 Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts proposes & votes for them.  Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process.

Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
-- Mr. Hal M. Bogotch
2520 Cloverfield Blvd
Santa Monica, CA 90405
* * * * * * * *
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
27 David Yakobson
From: Connor Webb <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:45 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Barry Snell; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Subject: Strong Support for Items 10.A and 11.C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Council,
I continue to support housing and the Council members who are taking action to deliver it. I strongly support items 10.A and 11.C and Council’s continued efforts to make it easier to build all kinds of housing in Santa Monica.

Housing is foundational to Santa Monica’s values and success. More homes means fewer families pushed out by rising housing costs, more opportunities for seniors and young adults to stay in the community, and a healthier mix of residents who can actually live near their jobs, schools, and daily needs. Increasing housing supply is one of the most direct ways to ease cost pressures, reduce displacement, and support a vibrant, inclusive city.

Thank you for your leadership and commitment to ensuring Santa Monica’s long-term success by supporting new housing.

Sincerely,
Connor Webb
Mid-City Resident, 90404
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
28 David Yakobson
From: ALICE ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:45 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process Importance: High

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Alice Ellis 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
29 David Yakobson
From: ALICE ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:46 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW Importance: High

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Alice Ellis 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
30 David Yakobson
From: Anne Saldo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:47 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda Item 11C 1/13/26: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers
We urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated. The FPPC confirmed that Mr. Zwick held a disqualifying conflict of interest. Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

We respectfulIy request that the City Council:

Declare the conflict-tainted votes null and void
Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Thank you.

Anne & Gerald Saldo
1004 Wilson Pl
SM CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
31 David Yakobson
From: Karen Croner <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:47 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I am a longtime resident of Sunset Park. I started off as a renter and raised a family here my husband and I both working long hours while also volunteering in the community.

We love Santa Monica, it is our home.

I passionately believe it is time for you to stand up for residents and stop bowing down to developers. Most of you are just passing through, not putting down roots. But we residents love and care about this town. We now realize many of you are simply on your way to other government positions,, city council is a stepping stone, and so your desire to scrape Bergamot arts, our civic auditorium, our neighborhoods makes more sense because there is now proof of these major conflicts of interest, several in fact. That have nothing to do with bettering the lives of Santa Monica residents.

Jesse Zwick has said the Civic Auditorium is an “encumbrance,” because he is being paid to entice developers to Santa Monica to develop housing. Zwick (and Hall I believe) want to engage in extreme council overreach by adding 3 stories and more units to SB1123 even though the residents absolutely oppose that. We are the only city requesting this. Why? What conflict of interest led to that specific language written by a developer to appear in the request?
We all know that your choice of 10 percent affordable means 90 percent market rate, and thus affordable housing is not your goal. And that you have built 300 percent of required market rate housing.

Meanwhile No one has stepped forward to demand doing safety and evacuation plans in advance of this densification because it seems the point is developer profit, not resident safety. And that is truly shameful.

There WILL be another fire and people will not be able to get out. And I’m sorry, but that’s on you.

This is truly heartbreaking.

And anyone who votes to re-ratify any of these Conflict of Interest votes should be considered complicit.

The facts and findings of unethical behavior will haunt you through your entire careers, or end them.

I know some of you are better than that. Much better. And Santa Monica deserves better.

Maybe if you actually loved the town as we do, you’d understand.

Zwick’s slate was elected by a tiny percentage of residents. They/you have no mandate.

Do the right thing.

I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
32 Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them - and that council member should have to prove no conflict.

Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Karen Croner
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
33 David Yakobson
From: ALICE ELLIS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:47 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Alice Ellis 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
34 David Yakobson
From: L. S. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 5:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in the North of Montana neighborhood since February 2012, drawn here by the tranquility and safety it offers for my family. We enjoy walking the charming streets, visiting local shops, and soaking in the close proximity to the beach and schools. However, I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could drastically alter our neighborhood.

This is not just a minor adjustment; the potential for three-story developments and increased density threatens to transform our community into something unrecognizable. We didn’t vote for this when we elected you. The rushed process surrounding this ordinance feels unacceptable, and it’s alarming that it seems to sidestep the important conversations we should be having about safety, infrastructure, and the real implications of such density.

Let’s be clear: adding density does not equate to affordability. We need to fully understand how this change will affect our neighborhood and the quality of life we cherish. I urge you to reconsider moving forward with this ordinance. We deserve a thorough public discussion on these changes before they become irreversible. Please halt this process now and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

Sincerely,
Lori Stephan
Homeowner, North of Montana
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
35 David Yakobson
From: Anne Saldo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:00 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) 1/13/26 - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
We are deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in our neighborhood.

Increased density does not equate to affordability.

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions. Santa Monica does not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law.

We respectfully urge you to rescind this unnecessary ordinance. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration.

Anne & Gerald Saldo
1004 Wilson Pl
SM CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
36 David Yakobson
From: Jessica Jarvis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:02 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
37 David Yakobson
From: Karen Croner <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:11 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve called Sunset Park my home for 25 years, drawn to the sense of community, the diversity, and the blue skies, low rise neighborhood we cherish. It’s a place where families thrive and children attend local schools, and it’s truly disheartening to witness the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to drastically alter so much that we love about our neighborhood, to decimate the nature, to block the sun, to take away play areas for children? And for what? The only people who want to go beyond state requirements of SB1123 are developers and several members of SM City Council. No other city in California has asked for these egregious expansions!!! You have gone too far this time. Enough is enough. You should read the ARB requirements again, it says SM is a place of spaciousness and beauty. Your additions to SB1123 are the opposite. You rushed this change in a false emergency and that is disrespecting the residents you work for. We are not stupid. We are watching carefully.

Increasing the height of new housing projects to three stories and allowing for 50% more floor area is unnecessary and goes beyond what state law permits. This isn’t just about adding density; it’s about preserving the last coiple of low rise Santa Monica neighborhoods. We can’t rush this process without considering the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands. The current approach feels hasty, sidelining meaningful citizen input and ignoring the vision we have for our city. Many of you on council are new to Santa Monica or don’t plan to put roots down here - but you work for residents who have put down roots. So have some respect for us. We demand it. It is time for you to listen. Especially as 1123 is connected to the Zwick etc. Conflict of Interest issues.

Our city is 80 percent multi family already! We only have 20 percent single family neighborhoods. We are already dense. Again this only helps developers and those in business with those developers, and those who may have conflicts of interest. For instance, why was the Ashland project demolished with NO warning signs, endangering all the neighbors? What city council member approved that, told the developer it would be OK to go ahead…Why was it rushed so quickly neighbors had to dig out alarm systems ringing all night that hadn’t been removed? Further, choosing to overdensify without FIRST doing a safety study and evacuation plan is truly dangerous and I am terrified my neighbors and I will be stuck in their/our cars unable to flee when the next fire comes, which it will.

Figure out how we’re going to get out first. Shouldn’t that be your priority? Don’t you care about that? I applaud the Planning Commission for actually asking for resident input. Welcoming it. City Council could learn a lot from this action on the PC’s part. PC, thank you for your grace here.

Finally, this isn’t what we voted for. And only a small percentage of residents elected the housing slate. You have no mandate. We need you to roll back this unrequired ordinance. Let’s protect our neighborhoods, our families, and our community from irreversible changes. Please listen to the residents. Please stop this proposal before it reaches the Planning Commission. Our voices matter, and we must be heard now. Do the right thing.

Sincerely, Karen Croner
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
38 Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
39 David Yakobson
From: Annie Lohr <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:11 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Annie Lohr
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
40 David Yakobson
From: Anne Saldo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:13 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers,
We urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest. According to Petrovich v. City of Sacramento, a conflicted councilmember's participation in a quasi-judicial decision invalidates the entire decision.

Given that this invalid rezoning violates the City's General Plan and environmental law, failed to follow the required procedure to change zoning, and currently faces multiple lawsuits, we respectfully request that you rescind it.

Thank you.

Anne & Gerald Saldo
1004 Wilson Pl
SM CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
41 David Yakobson
From: laura houston <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:13 PM
To: Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; [email protected]; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 11-C

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 23 years, drawn to the charm of single-family homes and the tranquility of our neighborhood. It’s a place where families thrive, children grow up, and neighbors stay for years.

However, I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could drastically change the nature of our beloved community.

This ordinance, allowing three-story developments and increased density, goes far beyond what is necessary and does not align with what Santa Monicans voted for when they elected you. The process has felt rushed and doesn’t reflect the careful consideration such a significant change demands. We should not be going beyond state law, especially without a thorough understanding of the impacts on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure.

Sunset Park is mainly single-family homes, and the apartments in the area are no more than three stories with less than 20 units. The city council needs to stop allowing builders to construct giant buildings. Density does not equate to affordability, and we must prioritize the quality of life in our neighborhoods.

I urge you to reconsider this ordinance and not send it to the Planning Commission. We cannot afford to make changes that could irreversibly alter the character of our community.

Please listen to residents like me and halt this process now.

Sincerely,
Laura Houston
33rd Street Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
42 David Yakobson
From: Karen Croner <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:18 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

He was wrong about tearing down Fairview, as he admitted, and he is wrong here again. Now we understand why.

Since Zwick is financially rewarded for developing relationships with developers who will build in Santa Monica, he cannot enter into any discussions regarding housing, or related matters.

It is time to listen to residents who will not tolerate any conflicts of interest. The housing slate was elected by a tiny percentage of residents. That slate has no mandate. I am certain all possible conflicts of interest will now be investigated carefully. It is time for you all to tread very carefully. Whatever happens now will after your future career, or potentially end it. Do the right thing.

Sincerely,
Karen Croner
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
43 David Yakobson
From: Kachru, Rita <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:19 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Rita Kachru, MD
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
44 David Yakobson
From: Tracy Lewis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:26 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Tracy Lewis
Santa Monica Resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
45 David Yakobson
From: Rachel nava <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:26 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Rachel Martella Nava
310-463-2226
[email protected]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
46 David Yakobson
From: Rachel nava <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:27 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Armando Nava
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
47 David Yakobson
From: Rose Nelson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:28 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Rose Nelson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
48 David Yakobson
From: Rose Nelson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:29 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Rose Nelson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
49 David Yakobson
From: Rose Nelson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:30 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Rose Nelson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
50 David Yakobson
From: Holly Silvers <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:33 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 26 years, and I adore this community. I have raised my family here. Please do not irreparably harm the community. We love the current density, and the traffic is already insufferable on 23rd & Ocean Park. I moved here to escape the verticality and overwhelming density of New York City, and the charm of Santa Monica is in its walkable neighborhoods, the ocean breezes, and the integrity of our local shops and parks.

The proposed zoning ordinance you are considering is not only unnecessary but also goes far beyond what the state law, SB1123, requires. Allowing three-story buildings and increasing floor area limits by 50% will fundamentally change the essence of our neighborhoods and create an unsustainable density that doesn’t equate to affordability. This isn’t what we voted for when we elected you; we expected thoughtful planning that respects our community.

This rushed process has denied us the opportunity for meaningful input, and that's unacceptable. Before you take this irreversible step, I urge you to reconsider. Don’t move forward with this ordinance. Instead, prioritize the safety, infrastructure, and well-being of our residents.

Please roll back this proposal before it’s too late.

The Granelli Family
Dennis, Holly, Luke and Grace
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
51 David Yakobson
From: Raquel Vallejo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:35 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Raquel Vallejo
1010 Wilson Place
Santa Monica, CA
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
52 David Yakobson
From: John Zemke <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:35 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
John Zemke
3030 Paula Dr, Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
53 David Yakobson
From: John Zemke <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:35 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
John Zemke
3030 Paula Dr, Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
54 David Yakobson
From: John Zemke <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:36 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
John Zemke
3030 Paula Dr, Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
55 David Yakobson
From: Jessica Jarvis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:37 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Jessica Jarvis 1315 Sunset Avenue
Jessica Jarvis
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
56 David Yakobson
From: Cathy Theile <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:40 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 45 years, drawn here by the strong sense of community and the ability to walk to everything I need. That sense of connection is at risk now, as I see the proposed zoning ordinance that could change our beloved neighborhoods forever. Allowing new housing projects to be three stories tall and exceeding current floor area limits by 50% isn’t necessary. This isn’t about creating more homes; it’s about destroying the fabric of our community.

Density does not equal affordability, and pushing for such drastic changes without adequate consideration of safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands is reckless. This isn’t what Santa Monicans supported when we elected this council. We want thoughtful growth that respects our neighborhoods, not a rushed process that limits our voices.

Please reconsider this unrequired ordinance before it’s too late. The decision to approve it on Tuesday could lead to irreversible consequences. I urge you to roll it back and prioritize the input of residents who care about the future of Santa Monica. Let’s ensure our city reflects the community values we cherish instead of succumbing to hasty changes that benefit neither residents nor our neighborhoods.

Sincerely,
Cathy Theile
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
57 David Yakobson
From: Carly Knauf <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:46 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Carly Knauf
2611 30th St.

Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
58 David Yakobson
From: Elizabeth Rowe <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:53 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; [email protected]; Jesse Zwick; [email protected]; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
As fairly new residents we are shocked that you are allowing the new commercial jet service at the airport! It is bad enough already, but the huge increase in noise, traffic congestion, and reduced safety is a shocking thing for this wonderful community. And when we first heard about it, it was supposed to be 5 flights a day, now it appears that it will be ridiculous during the various events like the World Cup. The Council does not seem to be interested in the wellbeing of the community. This is before I found out about the possibility of new 3 story houses. We are already being squeezed by giant two story houses coming in amongst our charming mid century neighborhood! Please do NOT approve 3 stories!! I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance— SB1123 was already a significant shift.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Betsy Rowe
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
59 David Yakobson
From: Betsy Baker Newell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 6:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Re: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Santa Monica CIty Counci

EXTERNAL
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Opposed - Pull Back on this Initiative, it is not a good one.

Santa Monica Council Members,
We are very unhappy with the proposed alterations to SB1123, and the emergency ordinance, which threaten to unnecessarily change Santa Monica for the worse. These actions/modifications will harm our community, not improve it. And we feel that the process to date has lacked the transparency and community input we should be able to expect.

The decision to allow three-story buildings in our residential neighborhoods feels hasty. The implications for safety, evacuation capacity, and adequate infrastructure need to be considered more carefully. We urge you to prevent the alterations to SB1123 from moving forward. Please listen to the community and prioritize our safety and well-being over haste and outside interests.

Let's ensure that we preserve the Santa Monica we love.

Robert & Elizabeth Newell
818 25th St.

Santa Monica, CA 90403
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
60 David Yakobson
From: Joshua Abarbanel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:01 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Joshua Abarbanel
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:42 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: For city council
Attachments: 2026-01-12 20-10.pdf
From: Mary Beth Woods <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:12 PM
To: Council Mailbox <[email protected]>
Subject: For city council

EXTERNAL
--
Sent with Genius Scan for iOS.
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tglapp.com/e/scan__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!uzYRvTFJLF2efPGZ13J5XGB0gif9 Osw0E_9bX5QcWBx10hrUZbPizOHazdtfuIfb5SlEZ7uO2cCFcMFAfzXdx8KRQjZ89cYL$ Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
61 David Yakobson
From: Nikki Kolhoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:06 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Oliver Chi; Heidi von Tongeln; Dan Kolhoff; Leanna Einbinder; Chris Knauf; Mindi Shank; Jonathan Shank
Subject: 1-13-25 City Council Item 11C: OPPOSE - Missing Rescission of Rezoning 2644 30th Street Moved By Zwick
Attachments: 2026-01-09 Jesse Zwick Conflict Rescind Invalid 2644 30th St Upzoning.pdf

EXTERNAL
Mayor Torosis and City Council -
Below is the request we sent to the City Attorney to include the upzoning of 2644 30th Street on the Agenda, either as part of Item 11C or as a separate item. Since it was not included, despite being a housing production motion made by Jesse Zwick after commencing employment with HAC, please include it as a comment to Item 11C.

Respectfully,
Leanna Einbinder and Chris Knauf
Nikki and Dan Kolhoff
Mindi and Jonathan Shank
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Nikki Kolhoff <[email protected]>
To: Heidi Von Tongeln <[email protected]> Cc: Oliver Chi <[email protected]>; Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Ellis Raskin <[email protected]>; Barry Snell <[email protected]>; Natalya Zernitskaya <[email protected]>; Caroline Torosis <[email protected]>; Dan Hall <[email protected]>; Jesse Zwick <[email protected]>; Nicole Kolhoff <[email protected]>; Dan Kolhoff <[email protected]>; Leanna Einbinder <[email protected]>; Chris Knauf <[email protected]>; Mindi Shank <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 at 10:15:24 AM PST
Subject: URGENT: Request re Rescission of Rezoning 2644 30th St Resulting from Zwick’s Conflict of Interest, and Inclusion on January 13, 2025 City Council Agenda
City Attorney von Tongeln -
Please see our attached request that you declare the Santa Monica City Council’s votes on September 30, 2025 and October 14, 2025 – upzoning the office building at 2644 30th Street to Neighborhood Commercial – invalid and void as a result of Councilmember Jesse Zwick’s conflict of interest, and consequently require the City to rescind the decision upzoning the property. We request that this item be added as an additional component to Item 11C on the January 13, 2026 City Council Agenda or added as a separate Staff Item on the same agenda.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
62 Respectfully,
Leanna Einbinder and Chris Knauf
Nikki and Dan Kolhoff
Mindi and Jonathan Shank
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026

VIA EMAIL
January 9, 2026
Heidi von Tongeln
Interim City Attorney
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street, 3rd Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: URGENT: Request for Acknowledgment of Invalidity and Rescission of Change in LUCE Designation and Zoning of 2644 30th Street Resulting from Jesse Zwick’s Conflict of Interest, and Inclusion on January 13, 2025 City Council Agenda
Dear Ms. von Tongeln:

We respectfully request that the City Attorney’s Office declare the Santa Monica City Council’s votes on September 30, 2025 and October 14, 2025 – upzoning the office building at 2644 30th Street to Neighborhood Commercial – invalid and void as a result of Councilmember Jesse Zwick’s conflict of interest, and consequently require the City to rescind the decision upzoning the property. We request that this item be added as an additional component to Item 11C on the January 13, 2026 City Council Agenda or added as a separate Staff Item on the same agenda.

BACKGROUND
On September 30, 2025, City Council approved a resolution that amends the General Plan land use designation for the office building at 2644 30th Street in Santa Monica from Single Family Residential to Neighborhood Commercial, and an ordinance that amends the Zoning District boundaries for Neighborhood Commercial to include the office building, which effectively rezones it from R1 (non-conforming use) to Neighborhood Commercial (collectively, the “Rezoning”).

Neighborhood Commercial allows large mixed-use housing projects, including housing developments up to 85’ tall with state bonuses. A covenant was entered into by the City in connection with the Rezoning; however, such covenant is limited in time and uses, consequently allowing certain redevelopment to commence immediately and any redevelopment to commence at a certain point in time. In addition, the upzoning of the office building to Neighborhood Commercial makes the residentially-zoned parking lot eligible for upzoning to Neighborhood Commercial as well because it is now adjacent to a commercial parcel.

Two lawsuits have been filed against the City relating to the Rezoning, alleging failure to comply with CEQA, violation of the City’s general plan, and failure to follow the City’s process for a zoning change.
1 Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
JESSE ZWICK’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) determined, per FPPC Advice Letter No.

A-25-153 issued on December 8, 2025, that Councilmember Zwick’s employment with the Housing Action Coalition (HAC) created a "nexus" conflict, stating, “Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying interest and may not take part in these [housing production] decisions.” While FPPC regulations do not permit FPPC to provide advice on conduct that has already occurred, as a result of the FPPC Advice Letter, the City elected to reconsider certain recent housing production decisions that were made by the City Council after August 12, 2025 with Councilmember Zwick’s participation.

INVALIDITY OF VOTES - APPROVAL IS VOID
It is our understanding that, based on the Santa Monica City Council Rules of Order and the California Political Reform Act, if a councilmember who originally made a motion is later determined to have been ineligible due to a conflict of interest, the council cannot simply "revote" on that same motion because that motion and vote is void. Instead, a new hearing with proper notice must be held, and a new motion must be made and seconded by councilmembers who do not have a conflict of interest, and the conflicted member must recuse.

In Petrovich Development Co., LLC v. City of Sacramento (2020), aCalifornia appellate court ruling established that a single biased or conflicted councilmember's participation in a quasi-judicial hearing is sufficient to invalidate the entire decision, requiring the city to hold a new hearing without the tainted member. This means that if the motion-maker had a disqualifying conflict at the time, their participation was prohibited. This renders the original motion legally defective or void.

APPLICABILITY TO 2644 30TH STREET
Housing Production Items Invalid
The FPPC determined that Councilmember Zwick may not take part in housing production decisions because of his disqualifying interest. The City Attorney placed Item 11C on the agenda (Consideration of Certain Prior Housing-Production Related Votes and Repeal of Interim Zoning Regulations Related to Projects Utilizing State Law for Small Lot Subdivisions and Duplexes and Lot Splits on Parcels Zoned for Single-Unit Residential) for Council to reapprove or ratify certain items that Councilmember Zwick participated in since July 2025 relating to housing production. The Rezoning is not included in the agenda.

The City Council’s decision regarding 2644 30th Street relates to housing production and was in fact originally brought forward in a package of zoning changes intended to increase housing production. The Rezoning not only changes the land use designation and zoning to Neighborhood Commercial, it expands the boundary of the Neighborhood Commercial Zone, which enables large mixed-use housing projects, up to 85’ with state bonuses. 2 Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Councilmember Zwick made the motion to approve the Rezoning on September 30, 2025. On October 14, 2025 City staff introduced a covenant to limit development of the property for a limited time, but which would ultimately allow significantly increased housing production, and Councilmember Zwick made the motion to accept the covenant.

Quasi-Judicial Decision is Void
Because a zoning change is a quasi-judicial decision, the original motion by Councilmember Zwick to approve the Rezoning on September 30, 2025 is invalid. Consequently, the Rezoning is invalid and should be voided. The motion to approve the covenant on October 14, 2025 was also made by Councilmember Zwick and is invalid and should be voided. Furthermore, the covenant flows from an upzoning that is invalid, and therefore it is moot.

If the City Council wants to redo the Rezoning, they would need to start the process from the beginning (including a public hearing with notice, a new motion, and new vote), rather than simply “ratify” or “reapprove” an invalid motion. However, given that the Rezoning violates the City’s land use General Plan, ignored environmental implications, failed to follow the required procedure to change zoning, and is the subject of multiple lawsuits against the City, we believe the prudent action is to formally declare the Rezoning invalid and voided and require the City to rescind the decision Rezoning the property, and this should be done at the January 13, 2026 City Council Meeting as an additional component to Item 11C or added as a separate Staff Item on the same agenda.

Respectfully,
Leanna Einbinder and Chris Knauf
Nikki and Dan Kolhoff
Mindi and Jonathan Shank
cc: Santa Monica City Councilmembers (Mayor Torosis, Mayor Pro Tem Zwick, Lana Negrete, Ellis Raskin, Barry Snell, Natalya Zernitskaya, and Dan Hall) City Manager Oliver Chi
3 Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
63 David Yakobson
From: Jessica Pirrone <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:11 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Jessica Pirrone
612 17th Street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
64 David Yakobson
From: Jessica Pirrone <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:12 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Jessica Pirrone
612 17th street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
65 David Yakobson
From: Jessica Pirrone <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:13 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Jessica Pirrone
612 17th street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
66 David Yakobson
From: Elisabeth Perez <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:17 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Elisabeth Perez
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
67 David Yakobson
From: Britt Johansson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:18 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I have lived in Sunset Park for 15 years, drawn to its charm, walkability, and the sense of community it offers. I appreciate that my neighborhood has allowed mom-and-pop shops to thrive and provided easy access to parks and libraries. However, I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could transform our beloved Santa Monica into something unrecognizable.

We shouldn’t be going beyond what state law allows, especially when the proposed three-story buildings are not necessary. This isn’t just about density; it’s about maintaining the quality of life we value. Adding more density does not equate to affordability, and it ignores the critical implications on safety and infrastructure. How can we effectively manage evacuation capacity and ensure safety with such rapid changes? This process feels rushed and lacks the public input that every significant change deserves. It is essential for the Council to recognize that this isn’t what the community voted for when electing you. I urge you to roll back this unnecessary ordinance and reconsider the impact it will have on our neighborhoods. Let's prioritize thoughtful planning that respects our values and community needs.

Please stop this proposal before it’s too late.

Regards,
Britt Johansson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
68 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Pearl <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:19 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Nancy Pearl
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
69 David Yakobson
From: Elisabeth Perez <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:19 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Eric Perez
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
70 David Yakobson
From: Catherine Myman-Kaplan <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:20 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members, I have called Santa Monica home for 16 years, drawn here by its strong community and exceptional schools. Over the years, I have cherished the stability and connection with my neighbors, which feels at risk with the proposed zoning ordinance. The idea of allowing three-story buildings and significantly increasing density without a thorough understanding of the implications is concerning. This rushed process is far from what we expect regarding such a significant change, and it doesn’t reflect what we voted for when we elected this Council. We should not go beyond the state law, SB1123, and adding density without addressing safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands is reckless. We need to pause and reconsider this ordinance. It is essential to include meaningful citizen input before moving forward. This change could redefine our neighborhoods in ways we might not be able to reverse. I strongly urge you to roll back this proposal and ensure that our voices are heard before any decisions are made. Let's protect the Santa Monica we love.

Thank you for listening,
Catherine Kaplan
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
71 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Pearl <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:20 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Nancy Pearl
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
72 David Yakobson
From: Nancy Pearl <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:21 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Nancy Pearl
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
73 David Yakobson
From: Darlene Vogel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:21 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Darlene Vogel
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
74 David Yakobson
From: Laura Park <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:23 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Laura Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
75 David Yakobson
From: Laura Park <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:24 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Laura Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
76 David Yakobson
From: Laura Park <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:25 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Laura Park
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
77 David Yakobson
From: Tina K <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:27 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Agenda item # 11-C

EXTERNAL
Hello all,
I voted for many of you this past election and I am alarmed that you are voting for the allowances of 3-story complexes in Santa Monica.

I am a 20-year Santa Monica resident since college and do not want further sub division and densification in our neighborhoods. These buildings are an eyesore and not necessary and do not provide the promise of new rentals.

The promise of low cost housing rentals is a sham and fraud since those required 2 or 3 rentals in the busking have income requirements that are not practical and so they stay empty and the landlord just increases the rent on the other units, making it unaffordable but the very rich to live there.

I am opposed to this measure and hope you will vote no since it’s not a state law.

Thank you,
Tina Schreiber
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
78 David Yakobson
From: Taylor Ferguson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:30 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict - Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:
 Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void
 Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them  Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Taylor Ferguson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
79 David Yakobson
From: Dan Kolhoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:31 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Dan Kolhoff
29th Street Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
80 David Yakobson
From: Dan Kolhoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:32 PM
To: councilmtgitems; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose- STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 18 years, drawn here by the affordability and the sense of community. I love my friendly neighbors, the parks that are walkable, and the convenience of shops and restaurants on Pico and Ocean Park. However, I am extremely concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to forever change our beloved neighborhood.

We shouldn't be going beyond state law, especially when it’s unnecessary to allow three-story buildings in areas like the residential streets of Sunset Park and the Pico Neighborhood. The speed at which this ordinance is moving through this Council is alarming. Such significant change to our zoning laws deserve thorough consideration and community input from the citizens who live here—not a rushed process that feels more like an afterthought.

This isn’t what Santa Monicans voted for when we elected you. We need to be cautious about adding density without fully understanding the impacts on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands it will create. Density does not equate to affordability, and we risk losing the essence of our neighborhoods.

I urge you to roll back this ordinance and ensure it doesn’t move forward. Our community deserves better.

Please, take a stand for Sunset Park and our shared future.

Dan Kolhoff
29th Street Resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
81 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:32 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

The rapid push for this change feels rushed for such a substantial rezoning. Increased density does not equate to affordability. It’s critical that we consider the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands before making such irreversible decisions.  We don’t need to go to three stories.
 We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.
 We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Taylor Ferguson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
82 David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:33 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Taylor Ferguson
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
83 David Yakobson
From: Robin OConnell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:34 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Robin O’Connell
3044 Paula Drive
Santa Monica 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
84 David Yakobson
From: Robin OConnell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:35 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Robin O’Connell
3044 Paula Drive
Santa Monica 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
85 David Yakobson
From: Robin OConnell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:35 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Robin O’Connell
3044 Paula Drive
Santa Monica 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
86 David Yakobson
From: Jennifer Shiri <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:41 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Shiri
858-922-5693
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
87 David Yakobson
From: Jennifer Shiri <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:42 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Shiri
858-922-5693
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
88 David Yakobson
From: Jennifer Shiri <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:43 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Regards,
Jennifer Shiri
858-922-5693
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
89 David Yakobson
From: Leanna Einbinder <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:43 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Please Vote NO on Agenda Item 11C

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Leanna Einbinder
Sunset Park resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
90 David Yakobson
From: Tracy Lewis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:44 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Tracy Lewis
Santa Monica Resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
91 David Yakobson
From: Jennifer Lynch <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:44 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Lynch
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
92 David Yakobson
From: Leanna Einbinder <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:45 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in Sunset Park and throughout Santa Monica. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Leanna Einbinder
Sunset Park resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
93 David Yakobson
From: Tracy Lewis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:46 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Tracy Lewis
Santa Monica Resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
94 David Yakobson
From: Leanna Einbinder <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:46 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Leanna Einbinder
Sunset Park resident
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
95 David Yakobson
From: Tracy Lewis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:47 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Tracy Lewis
Santa Monica Resident
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
96 David Yakobson
From: Dan Halperin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:48 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

Sincerely,
Dan Halperin
1030 Cedar St. SM.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
97 David Yakobson
From: Mark Varo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:55 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Mark R Varo
445 18th Street
Santa Monica CA. 90402
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
98 David Yakobson
From: life scott <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:57 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 34 years, raising my daughter in a peaceful community filled with singlefamily homes. I chose this neighborhood for its tranquility and the close-knit environment it offers families like mine. Now, I am frustrated at the prospect of a new zoning ordinance that threatens to transform our beloved community into something unrecognizable.

It's alarming that this proposal goes beyond even what state law allows, opening the door for three-story developments and oversized apartment complexes. This isn’t necessary, and it’s certainly not what Santa Monicans voted for when they elected this council. The rushed process behind this ordinance is unacceptable; it disregards the voices of residents who deserve a say in such a monumental decision.

Density does not equal affordability, and we can’t add so much to our neighborhoods without considering the serious implications on our safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands.

Stop the overdevelopment of Sunset Park. This is a community of single-family homes and needs to stay that way.

I urge you to roll back this proposed ordinance and ensure that our community's needs are prioritized.

We need to preserve the character of Sunset Park for future generations.

Scott Vida
33rd Street
Santa Monica
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
99 David Yakobson
From: Mark Varo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:58 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Mark R Varo
445 18th St
Santa Monica CA 90402
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
100
David Yakobson
From: Dan Halperin <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:59 PM
To: councilmtgitems; [email protected]; Peer Chacko; Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Josh Hamilton; Jim Ries; [email protected] Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
I urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest. The rezoning from R1 to Neighborhood Commercial allows large projects, including housing developments up to 85’ tall with state bonuses. The FPPC has determined that Councilmember Zwick could not legally participate in housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition. Since he made the motions to approve both the rezoning on September 30, 2025 and the limited covenant on October 14, 2025, these votes are invalid under California law.

Sincerely,
Dan Halperin
1030 Cedar St. SM
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
101
David Yakobson
From: Mark Varo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:59 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Mark R Varo
445 18th Street
Santa Monica CA. 90402
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
102
David Yakobson
From: Sumi Khatod <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:01 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
[Name]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
103
David Yakobson
From: Sumi Khatod <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:01 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Sumi Khatod
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
104
David Yakobson
From: Maury Pearl <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:01 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
As a long-time resident of Sunset Park for over 30 years, I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that stands to radically alter our beloved community. The idea of allowing new housing projects to reach three stories and exceed current floor area limits by 50% is shocking. This measure will destroy neighborhoods. We should not be going beyond what state law has set with SB1123, especially when the need for such a drastic increase in density is not justified.

This rushed process is unacceptable. It feels like a decision is being made without the meaningful input of the residents who call Santa Monica home. We deserve the opportunity to voice our concerns and fully understand the implications of these changes. Density does not equate to affordability, and cramming more buildings into already established neighborhoods could strain our safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure.

This isn't what we voted for when we elected this council. I urge you to reconsider this ordinance and not send it forward to the Planning Commission. We must protect our neighborhoods and ensure that any changes are in line with what our community truly needs.

Please, take a stand for Santa Monica.

Maury Pearl
30 year homeowner in Sunset Park
Thanks,
Maury
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
105
David Yakobson
From: Sumi Khatod <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:02 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Sumi Khatod
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
106
David Yakobson
From: Evan Rothstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:02 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Evan Rothstein
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
107
David Yakobson
From: Sumi Khatod <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:02 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Sumi Khatod
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
108
David Yakobson
From: Evelyn Lauchenauer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:02 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for 65 years, having grown up here, and I cherish the big canopy trees, friendly neighbors, and the community spirit that comes alive at Bob's Market and Marine Park. It’s disheartening to see a proposed zoning ordinance that could drastically change our neighborhood and Santa Monica as we know it.

This ordinance goes far beyond the state law, SB1123, and allows for three-story buildings and a 50% increase in floor area limits. Such density is not synonymous with affordability, and we shouldn’t be pushing for changes that compromise the safety, infrastructure, and quality of life we value. The rushed nature of this process is alarming; it’s not typical for such significant rezoning, and it feels like resident input has been sidelined.

I urge you to consider the implications of this proposal and how it contradicts what Santa Monicans voted for when electing you. Please roll back this unnecessary ordinance and take the time to truly engage with our community before making irreversible changes.

Let’s preserve the character of Sunset Park and ensure that our neighborhoods remain livable for future generations.

Evelyn Lauchenauer
[email protected]

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
109
David Yakobson
From: Evan Rothstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:02 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Evan Rothstein
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
110
David Yakobson
From: Melissa Varo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:02 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Melissa Varo
445 18th
Santa Monica CA 90402
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
111
David Yakobson
From: Melissa Varo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:03 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Melissa Varo
445 18th St
SM CA 90402
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
112
David Yakobson
From: Melissa Varo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:04 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Melissa Varo
445 18th
SM CA 90402
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
113
David Yakobson
From: Karen Arrigo-Hill <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:04 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Karen Arrigo-Hill
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
114
David Yakobson
From: Karen Arrigo-Hill <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:06 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Karen Arrigo-Hill
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
115
David Yakobson
From: Karen Arrigo-Hill <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:05 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Karen Arrigo-Hill
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
116
David Yakobson
From: Evelyn Lauchenauer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:08 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

Let’s preserve the character of Sunset Park and ensure that our neighborhoods remain livable for future generations.

Evelyn Lauchenauer
[email protected]

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
117
David Yakobson
From: Evan Rothstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:11 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Evan Rothstein
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
118
David Yakobson
From: Chris Pirrone <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:12 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
Please vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes may not follow proper process and certainly does not restore public trust.

My request is that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void 2. Allow items to return ONLY if a council-member, without conflicts, chooses to motion for them 3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean un tainted process.

Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Chris Pirrone
17th street Santa Monica homeowner
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
119
David Yakobson
From: Supriya <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:14 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Supriya Batra
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
120
David Yakobson
From: Supriya <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:15 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Supriya Batra
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
121
David Yakobson
From: Raquel Vallejo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:23 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
As a longtime Santa Monica resident, and a practicing lawyer, well versed in the damage, and patent unfairness of, conflicts of interest, I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void.

Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Raquel Vallejo
1010 Wilson Place, SM
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
122
David Yakobson
From: Katharine Dreyfuss <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:23 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Hello City Council members.

Please do not pursue support of Santa Monica Local Zoning Ordinance #SB1123. Support State law.

Santa Monica does not need 3 story buildings.

Thank you for maintaining the city as it is currently functioning.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Katharine (Kit) Dreyfuss
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
123
David Yakobson
From: Laurie Family <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:25 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica residents and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Anita-Marie Laurie
Santa Monica Homeowner
Anita-Marie
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
124
Please ignore any typos. This little screen is tough on my eyes! Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
125
David Yakobson
From: Raquel Vallejo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:26 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood - where traffic is already impacted due to recent large developments on Lincoln. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Raquel Vallejo
1010 Wilson Place, SM
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
126
David Yakobson
From: Raquel Vallejo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:28 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
As a longtime Santa Monica resident, and a practicing lawyer, well versed in the damage, and patent unfairness, of conflicts of interest, I urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Raquel Vallejo
1010 Wilson Place, SM
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
127
David Yakobson
From: Dennis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:36 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman; Dennis
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I've called Sunset Park home for the past seven years, drawn here by the parks, schools, and the vibrant community. I cherish the small stores, the friendly faces, and the sense of safety that comes with living in a neighborhood that feels like family. But now, I’m deeply frustrated and concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that threatens to change everything I love about Santa Monica.

This rush to adopt a new ordinance goes beyond what state law mandates with SB1123, and it doesn’t reflect what we, the residents, voted for when we elected you. Adding three-story buildings and increasing density is not a solution for affordability—it’s an invitation to chaos. We can’t simply cram more people into our neighborhoods without a clear understanding of the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands.

This isn’t just about new housing; it’s about preserving the fabric of our community. The process you’re pursuing feels rushed and out of step with what should be a thorough consideration of how these changes will impact all of us. I urge you to roll back this proposed ordinance and stop it from going forward. Let’s ensure that we prioritize thoughtful planning over hasty decisions that could irreparably harm Santa Monica.

Please listen to your constituents and take action now.

Sincerely
Dennis Granelli
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
128
David Yakobson
From: Tiiu Lukk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:39 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Tiiu Lukk
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
129
David Yakobson
From: Jonathan Kaye <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:41 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’m writing to express my deep concern about the proposed zoning ordinance that could dramatically alter the neighborhoods we cherish in Santa Monica, especially North of Montana. I moved here two years ago for the safety and quiet streets, and I’ve come to value the sense of community fostered by our current zoning.

The changes being pushed—allowing three-story buildings and significantly increasing floor area limits—feel rushed and seem disconnected from the realities of our neighborhoods. This isn't just about adding density; it’s about understanding the implications on our safety, evacuation capacity, and the demands on our infrastructure.

The recent state laws, like SB1123, already expand housing possibilities, and going beyond these guidelines isn’t necessary.

We, as residents, deserve a voice in such significant decisions. This ordinance is not what Santa Monicans voted for when electing you to the council. I urge you to reconsider this proposal and halt its progression. Let's ensure our neighborhoods remain safe and welcoming for all by rolling back this unrequired ordinance before it’s too late.

Please prioritize the community's needs and pause this process for meaningful input from residents.

Thank you for considering my perspective.

Jonathan Kaye
734 25th Street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
130
David Yakobson
From: Mitch Dorf <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:42 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Mitch Dorf
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
131
David Yakobson
From: Diane Sabatini <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:43 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Diane Sabatini
Diane Sabatini | 1801 Pier Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90405 |
(c) 310.804.9811
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
132
David Yakobson
From: Diane Sabatini <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:44 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Diane Sabatini
Diane Sabatini | 1801 Pier Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90405 |
(c) 310.804.9811
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
133
David Yakobson
From: Supriya <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:44 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Supriya Batra
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
134
David Yakobson
From: Diane Sabatini <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:44 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Diane Sabatini
Diane Sabatini | 1801 Pier Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90405 |
(c) 310.804.9811
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
135
David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:46 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: SMCLC Request to Pause Agenda Item 10A(2) for Zwick Conflict Investigation Attachments: SMCLCCAZwickPilotCOI1.12.26.pdf
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 2:53 PM
To: Heidi von Tongeln <[email protected]> Cc: Oliver Chi <[email protected]>; Council Mailbox <[email protected]>; Natalya <[email protected]>; Barry Snell <[email protected]>; Ellis Raskin <[email protected]>; Dan Hall <[email protected]>; Lana Negrete <[email protected]>; Caroline Torosis <[email protected]>; Jesse Zwick <[email protected]>
Subject: SMCLC Request to Pause Agenda Item 10A(2) for Zwick Conflict Investigation

EXTERNAL
Ms. von Tongeln,
This letter is time sensitive. As to tomorrow’s Council meeting, attached please find SMCLC’s second request to you to: 1) investigate when Councilmember Zwick’s conflict of interest arose as to Agenda Item 10A2 before Council votes on that item; and 2) disqualify him from voting on Agenda Items 16A1 and 16A5 pursuant to the FPPC Zwick Conflict Opinion.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter that is of significant public concern.

Diana Gordon
Co-Chair, SMCLC

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
January 12, 2026

VIA EMAIL
Heidi von Tongeln
Interim City Attorney
City of Santa Monica
RE: Second Request to Investigate and Determine When Councilmember Zwick’s Conflict of Interest Arose in relation to Council Agenda Item 10A(2) Before Voting on the Item; and Zwick Disqualification as to Agenda Items 16(A)1 and 16(A)5
Dear Ms. Von Tongeln,
The Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City (“SMCLC”) again formally requests that the City Attorney’s office investigate the conflict of interest involving Councilmember Zwick’s pivotal role in crafting an emergency pilot housing ordinance (“emergency ordinance”) between June and August 2025, due to documents you turned over to the FPPC on November 10 for its conflicts review. The facts giving rise to Councilmember Zwick’s conflict of interest are briefly described below and also detailed in Exhibit “A”.

In addition, SMCLC requests that the City Attorney advice Councilmember Zwick that he may not legally participate in any way, whether privately (Brown Act group), or publicly on Council Agenda Items 10(A)2 or 16(A)1-WSCCOG or 16(A)5-SCAG regarding Councilmember appointments to these organizations at tomorrow’s Council meeting based upon the FPPC conflicts ruling discussed below.

Councilmember Zwick’s actions to enact the emergency ordinance while negotiating for a job as a housing lobbyist with the Housing Authority Coalition (“HAC”) created a conflict of interest.

The City’s documents, and the two related Council meetings videos, establish that as of June 2025, Zwick was communicating with HAC’s executive director about future employment with HAC while he was discussing the emergency ordinance with City staff and two other Councilmembers to be agendized for Council discussion on June 10. The HAC employment negotiations continued until August 15, when Zwick secured a formal job offer from HAC’s executive director, which he accepted with alacrity. Only three days earlier - on August 12 - Zwick participated fully in the Council action to enact the emergency ordinance without revealing any conflict of interest or recusing himself.

It is undisputed that: 1) Councilmember Zwick took these actions without recusing himself; 2) he did not acknowledge that he was negotiating employment with HAC at the August 12 Council meeting when HAC’s executive director appeared before the Council to lobby for the emergency ordinance’s adoption; and 3) only three days later HAC’s executive director sent Zwick a written job offer, requiring turnaround acceptance and was promptly accepted.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
The conflicts issue regarding this emergency ordinance has not been disclosed or determined as it must be before the Council can vote on the matter.

There is no legitimate basis for the City Attorney’s continuing failure to review and publicly report on this serious conflicts issue. The City Council cannot amend the emergency ordinance on Tuesday as though no conflict exists: The proper remedy will depend on whether the emergency ordinance itself is legally infirm because of Zwick’s involvement and failure to disclose his communications with HAC in that time period.

Here are the reasons that no vote can be taken on Tuesday and the ethics review must commence now:
1) The FPPC conflicts opinion disqualifying Councilmember Zwick from any participation in future housingrelated actions also gave guidance to the City to review whether his past housing-related actions “while negotiating prospective employment” should also be determined for a possible conflict of interest. 2) The City appears to be following the FPPC’s advice only as to some past housing-related actions on which Zwick voted, including remedies such as rescinding emergency ordinances and requiring full planning commission/public review process. (See Agenda item 11(C) and accompanying staff report). 3) The City has no grounds to disregard the FPPC’s advice as to the very impactful and controversial emergency ordinance that Zwick championed in the same time period that enacted sweeping changes to the City’s housing production. Staff’s recommendation to recast the emergency ordinance as though no conflict exists at this Tuesday’s Council meeting is fatally flawed. 4) Likewise, the City Attorney has failed to consider Zwick’s existing conflict, made no determination as to whether his conflict requires that the ordinance be rescinded and reintroduced, and has not explained why it has been specifically excluded as part of the conflicts reviews or remedies that were conducted for the other housing-related actions involving Zwick which are the subject of Council Agenda Item 11(C).
5) While the law firm representing Cypress Equity – the developer who benefited hugely from the adoption of the “emergency” housing ordinance - is threatening to sue the City unless the City “permanently codif[ies]” the previous ordinance without changes, the City Attorney cannot cede her legal and ethical obligations to independently review this serious conflict issue because of a developer threat. She must determine the conflicts issue as to the emergency ordinance and advise the Council and the public as to the proper legal remedy along with the remainder of the Zwick conflict housing-related actions on the agenda.
6) This emergency ordinance involves a major housing policy that generated a high level of public concern. Acting as though the “emergency” ordinance can be readopted as though no conflict exists would render any subsequent ordinance legally infirm and would also erode the public’s confidence as to whether the City will uphold the required ethical standards for its public officials once a developer threatens the City with a lawsuit.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Conclusion:

Given all this, and the lack of any conflicts investigation or transparency as to the emergency ordinance’s infirmity, Council item 10(A)2 must be taken off calendar until the City, including the City Manager, the City Council, and the public receive a conflicts determination by the City Attorney and a recommendation as to the proper remedy based on that determination.

In addition, the City Attorney must enforce the FPPC opinion that disqualifies Councilmember Zwick from any participation in Council Agenda Items 16(A)1 and 16(A)5 regarding Councilmember appointments to these two important organizations that consider local and regional housing issues, with SCAG determining the RHNA allocations for Santa Monica.

Sincerely,
Victor Fresco
Diana Gordon
Co-Chairs, SMCLC
Cc: City Council
City Manager
Santa Monica Neighborhood Associations
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Exhibit “A”
November – December 2025
SMCLC’s Request for an investigation/determination/remedy regarding Councilmember Zwick’s conflict of interest as to the emergency pilot housing ordinance.

On December 1, SMCLC advised the City Attorney and the City Council that Ms.von Tongeln’s November 10 letter to the FPPC and exhibits concerning Councilmember Zwick’s potential future conflicts of interest raised additional questions as to significant actions he previously took in June and August to enact a controversial emergency pilot housing ordinance when he was in communications with HAC over prospective employment. https://smclc.net/PDF/SMCLCsQsforJZ120125.pdf
Our letter: A) sought a determination as to when in June those communications began relative to his sponsorship of that emergency ordinance, B) provided specific facts as to his leadership role in requesting its enactment, and C) detailed the closeness in time between his subsequent Council vote on August 12, 2025, and his HAC written employment offer only three days later. There is no dispute that Zwick was negotiating employment with HAC at the time.

The FPPC’s advice to the City to review Councilmember Zwick’s past actions in the time period when he was negotiating with HAC for employment.

In December, the FPPC issued its ruling that Zwick is prohibited from participating in any way in long-range and short-range planning decisions, related to zoning and housing policy as well as distinct development projects.

While the FPPC could not advise the City as to past conflict conduct involving Councilmember Zwick, it cautioned that it was up to the City to determine whether he may have engaged in conflicted housing production activities “while negotiating prospective employment:” “Because we only advise as to future conduct, this letter should not be construed as assistance on any conduct that may have already taken place, including any prior involvement in the housing production decisions the official may have engaged in while negotiating prospective employment. (See Section 87407 and Regulations 18329(c)(4)(A) and 18747.)” (FPPC Opinion Letter December 8, 2025, to Heidi von Tolgeln)
Councilmember Zwick was heavily involved between June - August 2025 in an emergency housing ordinance pilot program allowing market-rate housing projects and off-site affordable housing with incentives for housing production
June 10, 2025 Council Agenda item 16(B) (Requesting a pilot market-rate housing ordinance that led to the adoption of the emergency ordinance)
Councilmember Zwick brought this item forward at the June 10 Council meeting. He introduced the item, spoke passionately about the many reasons to enact such an ordinance, spoke at length during the ensuing discussion, was complimented by Councilmember Tsorosis for taking the lead and having done the previous hard work with staff to bring the item forward and successfully moved the item for a 6/1 vote for staff to prepare an emergency ordinance. (6.10.25 Council Agenda Item 16(B) minutes and webcast).

August 12, 2025 Council Agenda Item 10(B) (Enactment of the pilot market-rate housing program ordinance with incentives for housing production)
Members of the public spoke, including HAC’s executive director, who lobbied for the emergency ordinance.

Councilmember Zwick did not disclose he was on the verge of receiving an employment offer from HAC’s executive director and Zwick did not recuse himself.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
He participated in the lengthy Council discussion over the benefits of such an emergency ordinance, said he’d talked to profit and non-profit developers about getting affordable housing built, that he was confident that wherever off-site affordable housing would go in Santa Monica it would offer an incredible opportunity, that he didn’t see any downside – only an economic upside, mused as to whether enough housing would be built under the emergency ordinance but supported it as the “best chance” to see if housing gets built, made the motion and voted to approve the emergency ordinance. (8.12.25 Council Agenda Item10(B) minutes and webcast).

To date, the City Attorney has not investigated Councilmember Zwick’s conflict with respect to the emergency ordinance or responded to SMCLC’s request for an investigation.

The staff report for Tuesday’s Council meeting on January 12 does not include any mention of a possible conflict involving Councilmember Zwick with respect to Agenda Item 10(A)2. It recommends the Council vote to amend the ordinance as a “non-emergency” ordinance without further explanation.

As to the remaining prior housing-related actions taken when Councilmember Zwick’s conflict arose, the staff report does recommend ratification or rescission to cure the defective enactments.

Agenda Item 10(A)2 must be included in a full conflicts review alongside the other affected housing-related actions because Councilmember Zwick’s conflict arose before the emergency ordinance was adopted as occurred with the rest of these items.
###
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
136
David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:47 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Who is Councilmember Ed Zwick REALLY working for? From: Michael katz <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 1:53 PM
To: [email protected]; Council Mailbox <[email protected]> Subject: Who is Councilmember Ed Zwick REALLY working for?

EXTERNAL
An obvious conflict of interest exists whereby Council member Zwick works for both a housing development corporation and our Santa Monica City Council.

He has cast hundreds of votes, introduced and seconded numerous motions, and done Council business while working for outside interests — his employers! — interests that are impacted by his Council votes. How is this not outraging Council? He’s badly ripping us off, begging the question: How long has the Council known of his apparent conflicts of interests? How much corruption has staff known about and how much corruption has staff facilitated? I really want to know. And I’m not alone.

Michael Katz
3016 Ruskin Street
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
137
David Yakobson
From: Barry Kotler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:47 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Barry Kotler
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
138
David Yakobson
From: Barry Kotler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:48 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Barry Kotler
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
139
David Yakobson
From: Barry Kotler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:48 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Barry Kotler
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Christopher Knauf <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:23 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I’ve lived in Sunset Park for over 20 years, and I moved here for the family-oriented community, complete with parks, restaurants, and schools nearby. I’ve seen this neighborhood grow while maintaining its unique feel, but the proposed zoning ordinance threatens to change that forever.

The idea of allowing three-story buildings with 50% more floor area and reduced setbacks is alarming. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with SB1123, especially when this kind of density does not equate to affordability. This isn’t what Santa Monicans voted for when they elected this council. We love this community and would like to maintain its character while reasonably developing new housing options, not ramming in large structures that will create gridlock.

Moreover, the rushed nature of this process is unacceptable. It doesn’t allow for meaningful citizen input, and the implications on safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands deserve thorough consideration. This decision could irreversibly change our neighborhoods.

I urge you to reconsider and roll back this proposed ordinance. Please do not send it forward at all. Santa Monica deserves better.

Sincerely,
Christopher H. Knauf
Sunset Park
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 David Yakobson
From: irena mendez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:40 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Irena Mendez
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 David Yakobson
From: Kathryn Boole <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:50 AM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: Oliver Chi; Heidi von Tongeln; Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: JESSE ZWICK CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON MULTIPLE VOTES RE HOUSING

DEVELOPMENT

EXTERNAL
I strongly agree with the letters sent from Tricia Crane and the neighborhood groups. Councilmember Jesse Zwick should never have been allowed to vote on housing issues that affect the long term environment and ambience of our unique city.

It is clear to me that it is not in the interest of established Santa Monica residents , future residents, and even visitors to our extraordinary city, for its space to be used to build out massive structures that block the sunlight and sea breezes that are the signature of Santa Monica.

Mr. Zwick’s past housing votes must be negated and all issues put up for reconsideration.

Kathryn Boole
Santa Monica Resident
Sent from my iPad
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
4 David Yakobson
From: Amanda Enclade <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:51 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Rescind Proposed Zoning Ordinance

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
I am writing as a 21-year resident of Sunset Park to strongly oppose the proposed zoning ordinance allowing three-story buildings, increased density, and a 50% increase in allowable floor area.

This proposal exceeds state law requirements and goes far beyond SB 1123, which was already a significant and controversial change. There is no evidence that these added allowances will improve affordability, yet there is clear risk to neighborhood safety, evacuation capacity, and already-strained infrastructure.

The speed at which this ordinance is being pushed forward is inappropriate for a rezoning of this scale and has left residents without meaningful opportunity to participate. This is not what voters were promised.

We do not need three stories.

We do not need increased FAR.

We do not need reduced setbacks.

I urge the Council to rescind this ordinance rather than advancing it further. Once these changes are enacted, they cannot be undone. Please listen to residents and act accordingly.

Sincerely,
Amanda Enclade
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
5 David Yakobson
From: Ann Hoover <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:54 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell
Cc: Heidi von Tongeln; Susan Cola; Oliver Chi
Subject: January 13, 2026 Council Meeting - Item 11.C. - Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated, including the vote on October 14, 2025 regarding next steps at the Civic Center.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void

2. Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them

3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ann Bowman
Resident, 29 years

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
6 David Yakobson
From: Amanda Enclade <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:56 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and Void Conflict-Tainted Actions

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and to take the same action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated while disqualified.

The FPPC has confirmed that Councilmember Zwick held a disqualifying conflict of interest due to his employment advocating for the very policies on which he voted. Despite this conflict, he proposed, motioned, and seconded these items. Votes taken under such circumstances are fundamentally compromised.

Simply ratifying or reaffirming these actions does not restore public trust or cure the underlying violation.

I respectfully request that the City Council:
 Declare all conflict-tainted votes null and void
 Allow affected items to return only if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion them  Require entirely new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean and lawful process Regardless of one’s position on the underlying housing policies, our community deserves decisions made with integrity and in full compliance with ethics law.

Sincerely,
Amanda Enclade
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
7 David Yakobson
From: Faustino Garza <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:57 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:
* Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void
* Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them * Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Faustino Garza
1351 Pacific Street
Santa Monica 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
8 David Yakobson
From: Ann Hoover <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:58 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Lana Negrete; Natalya Zernitskaya; Dan Hall
Cc: Jing Yeo; Ross Fehrman; Rachel Kwok; Roxanne Tanemori; [email protected]; Heidi von Tongeln; Susan Cola; Oliver Chi Subject: January 13, 2026 City Council Meeting - Item 11.C.(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW!!!!

Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica residents and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Ann Bowman
Resident, 29 years
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
9 David Yakobson
From: LINDA KNAB <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:58 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers,
Agenda 11C should not be voted on or implemented. These zoning changes will only benefit multi million/billion developers, not the residents that you represent. These changes will also drive up home prices as developers will outbid individuals that are trying to buy a home for their families, not calculating how much profit they can make at the expense of the neighborhood they are destroying.

I'm deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that would allow three-story buildings and increased density in my neighborhood. We shouldn’t be going beyond state law with this ordinance—SB1123 was already a significant shift.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Linda Reinbold
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
10 David Yakobson
From: Faustino Garza <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8:59 AM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need or want to go to three stories.

We don’t need or want to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need or want reduced setbacks.

We do not need or want to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send the ordinance back to the Planning Commission. Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica Residents and rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Sincerely,
Faustino Garza
1351 Pacific Street
Santa Monica 90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
1 David Yakobson
From: Tracey Hom <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:26 PM
To: Santa Monica City Manager's Office; councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Lana Negrete; [email protected]; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Heidi von Tongeln; Oliver Chi; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Caroline Torosis; Roni Crichton; Teri Davis Bernstein; Esther Hickman; Brian Estwick; Karen M. Fisher; Molly; [email protected]; [email protected]; Eve Lopez
Subject: meeting items

EXTERNAL
I intentionally moved to Santa Monica after growing up in Westchester/Playa del Rey and then living in Manhattan Beach to raise my children in a laid back beach community near my work. We specifically chose a one story home that we could live in for years and we wanted a clean safe place for our kids. A couple of years ago a group of people ran for council who failed to tell any of their constituents that they were working for employers which caused conflicts, that they took money from developers and that they believed that people who wanted single family homes "were by definition racist" Tens of thousand of people purposefully bought single family homes in single family residential neighborhoods. Now the council wants to do away with our single family neighborhoods. My post, The City council (all except Lana Negrete) are ruining our city. Three of them have behave so unethically that every motion, ordinance and action is void. Pushing through so called emergency items which were not emergencies is done to prevent the citizens from having time to engage. Spot upzoning for developers, taking away set backs, raising the height limits of single family homes and allowing 10 units on a single lot. All of this to please their developer donors and employers. If they are allowed to keep going in this direction, WE WILL BE THE PALISADES AND ALTADENA. WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EVACUATE. THEY DONT CARE. We must clean up city hall.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
2 If you think you are going to get away with saying the common sense CEQA exemption applies to all of your actions without taking into consideration the impact on our community you will be surprised at how many more lawsuits will be filed. Your citizens are not going to put up with this. If we had wanted to live in downtown LA or NYC or Chicago we would have moved there. Our city cannot support the water usage or electrical usage of the units you have planned and we will be trapped in an emergency.

I am also concerned that the city manager and city attorney who we are paying $1,000,000 to collectively appear to be doing the council's bidding instead of making sure that the actions taken are in the best interests of residents. Oliver and heidi you work for all of us not 5 council members. Keep that in mind, please.

Tracey P. Hom Esq.
10850 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 825
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
3 Los Angeles, California 90024
310 749 5343
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
140
David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:50 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: Letter to the Mayor and City Council from Santa Monica Neighbors Attachments: Letter-Mayor and City Council of Santa Monica-Zwick-20260109.pdf From: Michael Farr <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 9:07 AM
To: Council Mailbox <[email protected]>; Caroline Torosis <[email protected]> Cc: Cary Davidson <[email protected]>
Subject: Letter to the Mayor and City Council from Santa Monica Neighbors

EXTERNAL
To The Honorable Mayor and City Council of the City of Santa Monica:

Attached please find a letter from Santa Monica Neighbors requesting a pause on council actions items regarding Councilmember Jesse Zwick.

Thank you for your consideration.

Best,
Michael
Michael A. Farr
Reed & Davidson, LLP
515 S. Figueroa Street, Ste. 1110
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone (213) 402-4583 direct

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This communication is intended only for the addressee and may be attorney-client privileged or contain confidential work product. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Please notify me if you received this e-mail in error.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
January 9, 2026
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Re: Request for Council Abstention Pending Review of Potential Conflicts Involving Councilmember Jesse Zwick
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:

Santa Monica Neighbors writes to express our concern following an advice letter issued by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC Advice Letter No. A-25-153) in which the Commission found that Councilmember Jesse Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest when participating in housing-related decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition (HAC).

Open questions remain regarding Councilmember Zwick’s prior participation in housing-related decisions during periods of employment negotiations with HAC. Santa Monica Neighbors filed a California Public Records Act request with the City Attorney to understand the facts and timing of Councilmember Zwick’s employment relationship with HAC and his participation in housingrelated decisions. The public deserves to know whether Councilmember Zwick participated in, influenced, or shaped City actions at times when he ought to have disqualified himself.

The City needs to review and report to residents the facts regarding Councilmember Zwick’s participation in City decisions during his employment considerations and negotiations with HAC. This process may involve considerable accountability, transparency measures, time and discovery.

Until that review and public process is complete, we urge City Council to refrain from voting on any agenda items that were moved, sponsored, or directed by Councilmember Zwick, or in which he played a significant role, to ensure appropriate determinations are made regarding his participation and disqualification. Proceeding without having a complete understanding of the facts risks compounding errors, impairing the validity of Council actions, and exposing the City to unnecessary legal challenges.

We hope the City will stand with the public, err on the side of transparency, exercise caution, and act with integrity until these facts come to light.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Thank you for your consideration to ensure the City of Santa Monica is responsive to its neighbors.

Sincerely,
Michael Farr
Secretary, Santa Monica Neighbors
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
141
David Yakobson
From: Mitch Dorf <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:50 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Mitch Dorf
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
142
David Yakobson
From: Dana Kotler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:50 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Dana Kotler
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
143
David Yakobson
From: Dana Kotler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:52 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
[Name]
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
144
David Yakobson
From: Tiiu Lukk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:54 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Tiiu Lukk
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
145
David Yakobson
From: Levin, Amy C <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:55 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
[Name]
Get Outlook for iOS
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
146
David Yakobson
From: Dan Peers <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:55 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision.

I request that the Council:

1. Pause Item 11C pending a formal City Attorney opinion on whether revote cures a defect under FPPC Regulation 18704 and Petrovich

2. Void the December 17, 2025 DDA vote and restart with conflicted members recused

3. Require binding Good Neighbor Agreements with enforceable security commitments

4. Ensure meaningful replacement parking before development proceeds This is not about opposing affordable housing. This is about following the law and restoring public trust.

Respectfully submitted,
Dan Peers
1315 Sunset Ave
90405
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
147
David Yakobson
From: Amy So <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:02 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Agenda Item Number 11-C on 13 Jan 2026 - Please vote no

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
Please vote no on agenda item number 11-C on 13 Jan 2026.

Please vote against excessive and irresponsible densification. Stop exceeding state laws. No to 3 stories. No to 50 percent increase in floor area. No to irresponsible densification without public safety and evacuation planning.

Amy So
Santa Monica homeowner
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
148
David Yakobson
From: Richard Orton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:04 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 11 C

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
As a 55 year resident of Ocean Park I have always cherished the fresh air, moderate temperatures, and the small-town feel of our community. This is why I am deeply concerned about the proposed zoning ordinance that could irreversibly alter the fabric of Santa Monica.

We shouldn’t be going beyond state law, and there’s simply no need to allow three-story buildings in our residential neighborhoods. The idea that increased density translates to affordability is misleading. More density without a careful assessment of safety, evacuation capacity, and infrastructure demands could overwhelm our neighborhoods. The rushed process we are experiencing is not acceptable, especially for a change of this magnitude. It precludes meaningful input from residents who know our community best.

This ordinance does not reflect the desires of me or my neighbors.

I urge you to reconsider this proposal and roll it back before it reaches the Planning Commission. We have a responsibility to protect the essence of our neighborhoods for future generations.

Please act now to prevent this unnecessary change.

Sincerely,
Richard Orton
Ocean Park
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
149
David Yakobson
From: Hillary Rollins <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:05 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Hillary Rollins
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
150
David Yakobson
From: Hillary Rollins <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:05 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Hillary Rollins
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
151
David Yakobson
From: Leone White <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:09 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Council members,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Leone A. White
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
152
David Yakobson
From: Leone White <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:08 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Leone A. White]
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
153
David Yakobson
From: Leone White <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:09 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Council members,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Leone A. White
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
154
David Yakobson
From: Mitch Dorf <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:09 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers,
I live at 2633 32nd street. We have had two frustrating virtual meetings with the architect and developers. Well, we think that’s who was on the call. They have consistently shown absolutely no concern about how this establishment will forever crush and change our quaint neighborhood for the worse. When asked if they did or will do a traffic study the response was no and that they didn’t need to. Who says something like that except one who has not a care in the world for us and our children. How you or the state can let this continue to realization is irresponsible to your duty as our representatives. Or, maybe I have it wrong. Are you as our City Council members devoted to protect and preserve the sanctity of the residents, homeowners, neighborhoods and citizens of Santa Monica? Or, are you in the business to sell out our beach town to developers. Council member Zwick obviously has made his choice. The question is, what is yours? The only person you really need to answer that question to is the person you see in the mirror. Are you comfortable the reflection you see is doing their duty? Only you can see, feel and answer that. It is something you will have to live with the rest of your life. So will we.

I urge you to do the right thing and rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest.

Sincerely,
Mitch Dorf
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
155
David Yakobson
From: So Marianne <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:10 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Agenda Item Number 11-C on 13 Jan 2026 - Please vote no

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
Please vote no on agenda item number 11-C on 13 Jan 2026.

Please vote against excessive and irresponsible densification. Stop exceeding state laws.

No to 3 stories. No to 50 percent increase in floor area. No to irresponsible densification without public safety and evacuation planning.

Marianne So
Santa Monica homeowner
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
156
David Yakobson
From: Chi Kong So <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:11 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Dan Hall; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Caroline Torosis; Natalya Zernitskaya; Jesse Zwick
Subject: Agenda Item Number 11-C on 13 Jan 2026 - Please vote no

EXTERNAL
Dear Santa Monica City Council Members,
Please vote no on agenda item number 11-C on 13 Jan 2026.

Please vote against excessive and irresponsible densification. Stop exceeding state laws.

No to 3 stories. No to 50 percent increase in floor area. No to irresponsible densification without public safety and evacuation planning.

Chi Kong So
Santa Monica homeowner
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
157
David Yakobson
From: Susan Collins <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:13 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,
Susan Collins
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
158
David Yakobson
From: Sara Tropea <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:47 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:
- Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void
- Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them - Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Sara Tropea
2507 18th Street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
159
David Yakobson
From: Sara Tropea <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:48 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Sara Tropea
2507 18th Street
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
160
David Yakobson
From: Archie Windsor <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:55 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void

2. Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them

3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Archie Windsor
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
161
David Yakobson
From: Archie Windsor <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:55 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

Please listen to the voices of Santa Monica residents and roll back this unnecessary ordinance.

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

We do not need to do anything more than the original SB1123 law. Please do not send it back to the Planning Commission. I respectfully request that you rescind this unnecessary ordinance.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Archie Windsor
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
162
David Yakobson
From: Archie Windsor <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:55 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Archie Windsor
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
163
David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 9:57 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Sincerely,
Jaron LeBlanc
Sent from my iPhone
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
164
David Yakobson
From: VERONICA GARCIA <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:04 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Verónica GarcíaHecht
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
165
David Yakobson
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:04 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Vanessa Mccarthy
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
166
David Yakobson
From: VERONICA GARCIA <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:05 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin; councilmtgitems
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - DON'T EXCEED STATE LAW

We don’t need to go to three stories.

We don’t need to increase FAR to 1.5.

We don’t need reduced setbacks.

Thank you for considering the future of our beloved city.

Sincerely,
Verónica GarcíaHecht
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
167
David Yakobson
From: VERONICA GARCIA <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:06 PM
To: Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

Sincerely,
Verónica GarcíaHecht
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
168
David Yakobson
From: Kate G <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:10 PM
To: Attorney Mailbox; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Cc: Oliver Chi; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Request to Void and Restart Hollywood Community Housing DDA - Item 11.A / Pause 11.C Due to Conflict of Interest

EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor, City Attorney, and Members of the City Council:

On December 8, 2025, the FPPC ruled that Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict of interest on housing production decisions due to his employment with the Housing Action Coalition.

Under FPPC Regulation 18704, making a motion constitutes participation in a governmental decision. Petrovich v.

I request that the Council:

Respectfully submitted,

Kate Gigliotti
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
169
David Yakobson
From: Lise Reilly <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:20 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Request to Void Conflict-Tainted Votes and Require Clean Process

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to vote NO on Agenda Item 11C and take similar action on all housing policy votes in which Councilmember Jesse Zwick participated.

Simply ratifying these compromised votes does not restore public trust.

I request that the City Council:

1. Declare these conflict-tainted votes null and void

2. Allow items to return ONLY if a councilmember without conflicts chooses to motion for them

3. Require new motions, seconds, and votes through a clean process Our community deserves decisions made with integrity, regardless of where we stand on the policies themselves.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Lise and Kevin Reilly
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
170
David Yakobson
From: Meliá Grasska <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:25 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Dear Council Members,
I implore you to please take a walk through Sunset Park and reconsider this new zoning ordinance. Our current density standards are, dense. The new construction homes in our neighborhood are filling the majority of each lot and ADUs are almost always as large as primary dwellings. Our parking is crammed and our streets gridlock between stop signs.

Changing zoning requirements to allow 3 story residences will completely destroy our neighborhood and it will not fix our housing crisis. I’ve watched as landlords have taken away garages from tenants to create vacant apartments (and not be required to curb their apron to allow additional parking in front!), and I’ve figured “people need housing”. I’ve shopped at yard sales of neighbors who have forfeited rent controlled apartments because they can’t handle the permitted after hour construction on Ocean Park and I’ve thought “people need housing”.

But, the rush to build is not our solution, it’s part of our problem. Developers aren’t adjusting their rents to fill their buildings, that’s an antiquated ideology. Now, they hold rents steady to avoid devaluing their properties. They’re not in this for the rental income, they’re in it to hold value in their properties and portfolios. The slough of vacant apartments in Santa Monica listed at $6k/month affirms that.

Sunset Park is one of the rare pockets of Los Angeles where people walk to do their errands. Kids ride their bikes to school. This neighborhood makes you remember the time when Santa Monica was a small beach town. Now, we’re a city, but we shouldn’t forget our roots. There’s space for large developments in Downtown Santa Monica, they don’t belong in Sunset Park.

If you change the ordinance to allow three story residences you’ll quite literally suck all of the light out of our neighborhood, and this is a true concern with almost every one of my neighbors. Light is already scarce here, and losing more would be devastating. So devastating, that if my neighbors put up a three story residence, we would sell our dream home and leave Santa Monica... and we wouldn’t even have to think for more than a moment about that choice. Malibu can take my property taxes at that point… they don’t just have light, they have view protections.

All of my neighbors are scared. They’re all saying the same thing and they all seem to feel the same way. “Where will we go?” “Are we going to even have any sun?” “How is the city allowing this?” “It’s going to be like New York City!” It’s upsetting to live in a place where you feel your home could be ruined at any moment. And that’s what this change would do. It would ruin our neighborhood. We would go from a neighborhood where everyone knows everyone to being a metropolis. I don’t mind change, but I love Santa Monica because it’s a beach town at heart.

Don’t lose that heart, or Sunset Park will become the next 3rd St Promenade.

The airport is closing in a few years and every vacant office building is already repositioning to housing. If the city offers unchecked expansion, Sunset Park will become a breeding ground for greedy developers and the vacant Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
171
office buildings are going to become vacant apartment buildings, all with uncompromisingly high rents to maintain property value for development portfolios and there will be a surplus of expensive housing which no one can afford.

I urge you to dip a toe into the water before diving head first. Change is good. But too much change too quickly is not. How much density is too much density? And by the time you realize the answer will it be too late? Thank you for your time,
Melia Grasska
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
172
David Yakobson
From: Nikki Kolhoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:27 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick
Cc: Oliver Chi; Heidi von Tongeln
Subject: 1-13-25 City Council Item 11C: OPPOSE - City Attorney Must Review and Restate ALL Zwick Items

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers -
Staff claims Item 11C will "remove doubt with respect to the prior actions." By rubber stamping them? How is that possible?
The FPPC determined Councilmember Zwick has a disqualifying conflict on housing production items due to his HAC employment. Housing production dominates this Council's activity—both directly and through items that facilitate housing development. Yet upon learning that one of Council's most fervent housing advocates— who fundamentally altered this city's course by bringing items forward, making motions, and voting—has a disqualifying conflict, staff's instinct is to quickly ratify these tainted matters as if the conflict never existed.

Nothing to see here.

Santa Monica residents deserve a do-over, free from Zwick's influence. Each item must be brought by unconflicted councilmembers and receive only input and deliberation from those without conflicts.

Staff disingenuously claims "the FPPC did not find that Mayor Pro Tem Zwick acted improperly." That isn't the advice division's purview. Complaints could be filed, he could be investigated, and residents could sue. The city remains subject to liability for invalid actions so long as they stand.

Staff purports to have reviewed only votes from August 12 and September 30 and identified merely a handful of items to "confirm." This raises critical unanswered questions: Why didn't staff look at the entire conflict period? What criteria were used? How were only these selected?
Here (below) is a complete list of all items Zwick was involved in that are directly or indirectly related to housing production. The City Attorney must review each one and determine it is unrelated to housing production—or start over. It's far more extensive than what's before you tonight.

Do the right thing: rescind these items, or at minimum table them to allow proper staff review and purge all items stemming from Zwick's disqualifying conflict. Don't double down on this conflict.

Thank you,
Nikki Kolhoff
Santa Monica Resident and Voter
Jesse Zwick Conflict of Interest List
Housing Production and Housing Related Items
July 9, 2025 - December 16, 2025
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
173
Exhibit A: Housing Production Items Zwick Moved/Seconded  07/29/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.C Direct the City Manager to return with options for revising development standards to effectively implement Housing Element Program 1.C. Despite prior best efforts, our City continues to see underutilized parking lots remain vacant on commercial corridors.

Updates to development standards may be needed in order to incentivize housing projects along transit corridors and near a future “Great Park.” Specifically, additional incentives may include new zoning/ development standards for housing projects on surface parking lots associated with commercial corridors that match the zoning/ development standards of the commercial corridors they abut and removal of the requirement that new housing projects replace code-required parking at 50% (brought 16 Item, seconded)
 08/12/2025 R Consent Calendar (Pulled) 4.L Adoption of Resolution No. 11695 (CCS) of Intention to Amend the Text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance Related to Projects Utilizing State Law Permitting Small Lot Subdivision Under 10 Units and Projects Consisting of Duplexes and Lot Splits for Parcels Zoned for Single-Unit Residential (Seconded)
 09/30/2025 R Staff Administrative 11.A Off-site Affordable Housing Pilot Incentive Program Status Update (seconded)
 09/30/2025 R Public Hearing 12.A Adoption of Resolution No. 11702 (CCS) to Amend the Santa Monica General Plan Land Use Map and the Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the Official Districting Map for a Portion of the Parcel Located at 2644 30th Street (moved)  10/14/2025 R Staff Administrative 11.D Acceptance of Agreement 11779 (CCS) Imposing Restrictions on Real Property for the Parcel Located at 2644 30th Street and Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2833 (CCS) Amending the Official Districting Map for a Portion of the Parcel Located at 2644 30th Street (Moved)
Exhibit B: Housing-Related Items Zwick Moved/Seconded
 07/29/2025 R Public Hearing 12.A Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution No. 11690 (CCS) Approving Proposed Civic Center Specific Plan Amendment; and Introduction for First Reading to Adopt the Second Amendment to the Development Agreement for RAND’s existing institutional office building located at 1776 Main Street (Seconded)
 09/09/2025 R Consent Calendar (Pulled) 4.S Resolution No. 11698 (CCS) Outlining the City's Current Fiscal Distress (Seconded)
 10/14/2025 R Staff Administrative 12.A Approval of 2025 Report on Water Quality and Public Health Goals (Seconded)
 10/28/2025 Consent Calendar (Pulled) 4.A Resolution Nos. 11709 through 11711 (CCS) Approving Historic Property Preservation Agreements (Mills Act Contracts) with the Owners of the Properties Located at 137 Hart Avenue, 1958 20th Street, and 226 Palisades Avenue (Pulled from Consent by Hall and Zwick)
 12/16/25 Public Hearing 12.A Approval of Establishment of a Self-Certification Pilot Program and Introduction and First Reading of Ordinances to (1) Amend Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter

8.108 to revise the Construction and Demolition Material Recycling Compliance Process and to transition from a deposit-based system to a fine-based enforcement approach, and (2) Establish Interim Zoning Regulations Updating Applicability Thresholds and Standards for Resource and Recycling Room Dimensions; and Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Amend the Text Section 9.21.130 of the Zoning Ordinance Related to Resource Recovery and Recycling Standards (Moved) Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
174
Exhibit C: Housing Production Items Zwick Voted On/Participated  07/29/2025 R Closed Session 5.C Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Stanford Neighbors Against City Overreach v. City
 07/29/2025 R Closed Session 5.D Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - Ashland Neighbors v. City
 07/29/2025 R Public Hearing 12.B Public Hearing and Adoption of Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 2821 (CCS) of the City Council of the City of Santa Monica Extending and Amending Regulations Established by Emergency Interim Zoning Ordinance 2816 (CCS) to Permit the Establishment of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) as Part of Projects Utilizing Senate Bill (SB) 1123 on Vacant Parcels Zoned for Single-Unit Residential, Ensure Project Feasibility of SB 1123 Projects by Providing for Certain Relaxed Development Standards, and Expand the Establishment of ADUs to All Projects Utilizing Government Code Sections 65852.28 and 66499.41 Which Includes Parcels Within Multiple-Unit Zoning District as Permitted Pursuant to SB 684  08/12/2025 R Consent Calendar (Pulled) 4.E Adoption of Resolution No. 11693 (CCS) and Authorization for the City Manager to Execute a Housing Trust Fund Loan to Community Corporation of Santa Monica for the Rehabilitation of 2033-2101 Virginia Avenue,  08/12/2025 R Ordinance 10.A Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance 1) Amending the Text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance to Promote Economic Recovery and Increase Land Use Flexibility in the City’s Downtown Area; and 2) Amendments to Interim Zoning Regulations to Promote Economic Recovery by Increasing Land Use Flexibility in the City’s Downtown Area and Establishing a Pilot Program to Allow Exclusively Outdoor Commercial Uses in the Office Campus District  08/12/2025 R Ordinance 10.B Introduction and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2824 (CCS) Establishing Off-site Affordable Housing Pilot Incentive Program
 09/09/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.N Second Reading and Adoption of Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 2825 (CCS) Amending Interim Zoning Regulations Established to Promote Economic Recovery by Increasing Land Use Flexibility in the City’s Downtown Area and Establishing a Pilot Program to Allow for Exclusively Commercial Outdoor Uses in the Office Campus District  09/09/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.O Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2826 (CCS) Amending the Text of Santa Monica Municipal Code Article 9 Planning and Zoning to Promote Economic Recovery and Increase Land Use Flexibility in the City’s Downtown Area  09/09/2025 R Staff Administrative 11.C "Approval of Proposed Regulatory Updates to High-Rise Building Definitions and Single Stairway Multi-Family Building Provisions"  09/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.J "direct the City Manager to create an online portal and mapping feature to track the application status and progress of all Development Entities taking advantage of the new Off-Site Affordable Housing Pilot Incentive Program"  09/30/2025 R Ordinance 10.A Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance Adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Code and Adoption of Resolution No. 11701 (CCS) making Findings of Climatic, Geological and Topographical Conditions
 09/30/2025 R Public Hearing 12.B Adoption of Resolution No. 11703 (CCS) to Amend the Santa Monica General Plan Land Use Map and the Introduction and First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the Official Districting Map for the Parcel Located at 1331 Wilshire Boulevard  09/30/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.C Directing the City Manager to assess options for enhanced On-Site Public Notice Requirements for Development Projects that will provide greater Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
175
transparency and accessibility that will provide community members with additional project information and engagement opportunities
 10/14/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.H Adoption of Affordable Housing Production Program Fee Resolution No. 11705 and 11706 (CCS)
 10/14/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.N Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2831 (CCS) to Adopt the 2025 California Building, Residential, Electrical, Energy, Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire, Green Building, Wildland-Urban Interface, Historical, and Existing Building Standards Codes and Local Amendments to the 2025 California Building Standards Code  10/14/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.O Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2832 (CCS) Amending the Official Districting Map for the Parcel Located at 1331 Wilshire Boulevard  10/28/2025 Closed Session 5.E Conference with real estate negotiator - Gov. Code § 54956.8; property:
1640 14th Street, Santa Monica, California; City negotiator: Oliver Chi, City Manager; persons to be negotiated with: Nick Bode, Redcar Properties/1640 14th OWNER LLC; under negotiation: price and terms of payment
 10/28/2025 Councilmember Discussion 16.F Request of Mayor Negrete that the City Council consider directing the City Manager to provide Community Engagement, Zoning Clarity, and Accountability for LA County and Nonprofit Operated Housing Projects
 12/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.C Recommendation to accept Dolores Sloan's resignation from the Landmarks Commission
 12/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.D Request of Mayor Negrete that the City Council consider directing the City Manager on Ensuring Accountability, Safety, and Transparency for Sober Living and Congregate Recovery Housing
 12/16/25 Consent Calendar 4.B Adoption of Resolution No. 11725 (CCS) Approving Final Parcel Map No. 83963 for a Three Unit Condominium Project at 2012 19th Street Exhibit D: Housing-Related Items Zwick Voted On/Participated  07/29/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.B Authorize Councilmember Zernitskaya travel funds for YIMBYtown 2025 conference
 07/29/2025 S Councilmember Discussion 16.A Remove all six current DTSM Board members  07/29/2025 S Councilmember Discussion 16.A Suspend rules (emergency) and appoint interim DTSM Board members: Gregory, Besser, Patterson, Davis, Bloom, Polachek  08/12/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.C Accept Grant Award from Softwood Lumber Board for Mass Timber Accelerator Program
 08/12/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.M Second Reading and Adoption of Second Amendment No. 2822 (CCS) to the RAND Development Agreement
 08/12/2025 R Consent Calendar (Pulled) 4.L Adoption of Resolution No. 11695 (CCS) of Intention to Amend the Text of the City’s Zoning Ordinance Related to Projects Utilizing State Law Permitting Small Lot Subdivision Under 10 Units and Projects Consisting of Duplexes and Lot Splits for Parcels Zoned for Single-Unit Residential
 08/12/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.A Appointment to one vacancy on the Building & FireLife Safety Commission for a term ending June 30, 2029: James Wilson  08/12/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.B Appointment to one vacancy on the Housing Commission for a term ending on June 30, 2027 (postponed) Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
176
 09/09/2025 R Staff Administrative 11.A Approval of Santa Monica Aging and Disability Action Plan  09/09/2025 R Closed Session 5.C Conference with real estate negotiator - Gov. Code § 54956.8; property: 395 Santa Monica Place, Santa Monica, California; City negotiators: Oliver Chi, City Manager and Heidi von Tongeln, Acting City Attorney; persons to be negotiated with: Chris Neilson, Trigild IVL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, solely in its capacity as receiver for the specific assets of Macerich SMP LP; under negotiation: price and terms of payment  09/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.E Accept Analise Wells resignation from Housing Commission
 09/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.A Appointment to three unscheduled vacancies for terms ending on June 30, 2026, and three unscheduled vacancies for terms ending on June 30, 2028 on the Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. Board: Hodge Patterson IV, Judy Kruger, Sean Besser, Gleam Davis, Richard Bloom, Albin Gielicz
 09/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.C Appointments to five scheduled vacancies on the Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee for terms ending on June 30, 2029: Milan Ramsey, Sam Shapiro-Klein, Mark Bertler, David Goltsman
 09/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.D Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Disabilities Commission for a term ending on June 30, 20: Nicole Nguyen  09/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.I create a pilot microgrant program to address the habitability of Rent-Controlled/Deed Restricted Unit
 09/09/2025 S Closed Session 5.A Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1): Leonid Pustilnikov, Jon Farzam v. City of Santa Monica, City Council, Downtown Santa Monica, Inc.; LASC # 25STCP0346
 09/30/2025 R Closed Session 5.B Conference with real estate negotiator - Gov. Code § 54956.8; property: 3100 Donald Douglas Loop North, Santa Monica, California; City negotiator: Oliver Chi, City Manager; persons to be negotiated with: Delux Public Charter, LLC dba JSX Air (JSX); JSX negotiator:

Alex Wilcox, CEO; under negotiation: lease price and terms of payment  09/30/2025 R Staff Administrative 11.B Considerations for Reforming Neighborhood Organization Grant Program
 10/14/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.E Adoption of Resolution No. 11704 (CCS) on the SB 1205 Annual Fire Inspection Report
 10/14/2025 R Staff Administrative 11.C Approval of First Modification to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with Revitalization Partners Group (RPG), LLC for the Civic Center Auditorium Renovation, Programming and Operation
 10/14/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.A Request of the Disabilities Commission to declare Arlene Frames' seat vacant due to absenteeism and lack of communication  10/28/2025 Consent Calendar 4.F Authorization to Enter into Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Lease Agreement with Bank of America for City-Owned Property Located at 1301 Fourth Street
 10/28/2025 Consent Calendar 4.G Resolution No. 11712 (CCS) Ratifying Homelessness Emergency Proclamation
 10/28/2025 Consent Calendar 4.H Adoption of Resolution No. 11713 (CCS) Ratifying Regional Fires Emergency Proclamation and Supplements
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
177
 10/28/2025 Staff Administrative 11.A "Santa Monica Realignment Plan - adopt staff recommendation items 1, 3-11, 16-19, removing the gondola: 1. Approve all budget adjustments and personnel authorizations required to implement the Realignment plan (Attachments A, B, & C); 3. Adopt Credit Card Convenience Fee Resolution No. 11716 (CCS) (Attachment E); 4. Adopt Resolution No. 11717 & 11718 (CCS) authorizing non-sworn employee benefit enhancements, a Citywide winter closure, and a wellness benefit for equity alignment (Attachment F & G); 5. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 13.04, Vacant Properties, of Article 13, Neighborhood Preservation, of the City of Santa Monica Municipal Code to require the registration of vacant properties (Attachment H); 6.

Authorize staff to assess options for expanding the SaMo Bridge facility and development of a vehicle habitation ordinance; 7. Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 4.25 regarding the registration of rental housing units not subject to local rent control (Attachment I); 8. Introduce for first reading an interim zoning ordinance amending Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.31.200, Outdoor Dining and Seating on Sidewalks, to promote economic recovery by simplifying the City’s outdoor dining program (Attachment J); 9. Adopt Outdoor Dining Fee Program Resolution No. 11719 (CCS) to institute an updated fee reduction program for parklets and sidewalk dining (Attachment K); 10. Authorize staff to assess possible expansion of the Entertainment Zone program for the Downtown, the Pier, and business improvement districts; 11. Authorize staff to assess the Pier-to-Pier ferry, beach gondola, and regional fire dispatch concepts; 16. Authorize staff to pause Transportation Demand Management (TDM) survey requirements for businesses; 17. Authorize staff to extend the Master Facilities Agreement (Measure YY / GS) with the Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD) beyond its current 2028 expiration date; 18. Authorize staff to continue assessing a possible 2026 parcel-tax ballot measure to sustain City-SMMUSD funding through the Joint Use Agreement; and 19. Adopt a finding of no possibility of significant effect pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
 10/28/2025 Staff Administrative 11.A Santa Monica Realignment Plan - adopt staff recommendation item 2: 2. Adopt Parking Fee Update Resolution No. 11715 (CCS) (Attachment D);  10/28/2025 Councilmember Discussion 16.A Accept Ann Bowman resignation from Recreation and Parks Commission
 10/28/2025 Councilmember Discussion 16.B Accept Deborah Lynch resignation from Housing Commission
 10/28/2025 Councilmember Discussion 16.D Appointments to two vacancies on the Housing Commission for terms ending on June 30, 2027 and June 30, 2028 (tabled to January)  12/09/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.G Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2838 (CCS) Amending Chapter 13.04, Vacant Properties, of Article 13, Neighborhood Preservation, of the City of Santa Monica Municipal Code to Require the Registration of Vacant Properties  12/09/2025 R Consent Calendar 4.I Approval of Minutes for Redevelopment Successor Agency Meeting  12/09/2025 R Closed Session 5.A Conference with legal counsel – existing litigation – Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1): Measure LC Defense et al. v. City of Santa Monica et al., LASC # 25STCP04362  12/09/2025 R Councilmember Discussion 16.B Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Disabilities Commission for a term ending on June 30, 2029  12/16/25 Consent Calendar. 4.G Annual Report on Low-Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund for Fiscal Year 2024-25
 12/16/25 Consent Calendar 4.J Adoption of Resolution No. 11726 (CCS) Ratifying Homelessness Emergency Proclamation
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
178
 12/16/25 Consent Calendar 4.K Adoption of Resolution No. 11727 (CCS) Ratifying Regional Fires Emergency Proclamation and Supplements
 12/16/25 Closed Session 5.E Conference with legal counsel – existing litigation - Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1): Measure LC Defense et al. v. City of Santa Monica et al., LASC # 25STCP04361  12/16/25 Councilmember Discussion 16.C Direct the City Manager, in coordination with the City Attorney to establish a Citywide Realignment Performance Framework and public-facing dashboard that organizes outcome and output performance indicators across the Realignment Plan's five priority areas  12/16/25 Councilmember Discussion 16.E Establish a formal performance evaluation process for the City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
179
David Yakobson
From: Lise Reilly <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:32 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Subject: Request to Rescind Upzoning at 2644 30th Street

EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and City Councilmembers,
I urge you to rescind the upzoning of 2644 30th Street, which was approved through votes made by Councilmember Zwick despite his disqualifying conflict of interest.

Sincerely,
Lise and Kevin Reilly
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
180
David Yakobson
From: Glen Tistaert <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 10:47 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
It took years of hard work and forfeiting going on vacations or spending money to see shows or go to entertainment, but eventually this paid off and we were able to purchase a residential property where the kids had a back yard to play in and we could have a family dog with place for it to run around. Apartments are not a place for a person, kids, or a pet anymore than a prison cell. Even the homeless are aware they need open space and the outdoors available to them.

People are brainwashed into thinking that living in box known as an apartment is an acceptable way to live. The apartment dwellers life mimics worker bees living in a hive. We have a vast array of pharmaceuticals ment to deal with depression. Then we have secondary and tertiary pharmaceuticals to deal with what the primary antidepressant does get rid of and tertiary antidepressants to treat what the secondary drug does not sufficiently alleviate. The human being and complex brain was not designed to live in an apartment where you do not have outdoors and sunlight and room for exercise and often are forced to live in a facility where there may be likable people but also people you conflict with. People are amazed when homeless do not want to be moved inside, but often they are more in touch with their inner feelings than the people that just do not understand why they feel miserable living in their apartment building.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
181
When it is psychologically unpleasant to be trapped in an apartment, for many people, why are we still trying to take people off the land and compartmentalize them in apartments. It is because there are people and corporations that do not care what they psychologically are doing to people as long as they are making man-made dollars off the project. The developers can take their man-made dollars and go buy multimillion dollar estates for themselves to live in.

There is just something wrong with this picture.

Let's not destroy life for the people that have worked hard to try and find a small house and property to call their own. Let the hard working people have their little abodes so they and their kids can grow up without being psychologically traumatized by being stuffed into an apartment building.

Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
Item 11-C
January 13, 2026
182
David Yakobson
From: Chase Simpson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 11:03 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Oliver Chi; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Caroline Torosis; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Ellis Raskin
Cc: Shawn Landres; Nina Fresco; Jim Ries; Josh Hamilton; Leslie Lambert; Peer Chacko; Jacob Wasserman
Subject: Re: Agenda Item 11C(2) - Oppose - STOP EXCEEDING STATE LAW

EXTERNAL
Thank you Caroline very much for your response. I understand that this is just a preliminary discussion. I guess what I don’t understand is why this is being discussed in the first place? I thought the purpose of zoning was to create a law about what is and is not allowed in specific areas. For example, if I wanted to buy a piece of land to open a zoo, the first step would be to look at zoning and permitted uses. I would only consider properties with the correct zoning. That’s why zoning exists, correct? If I came to the city desperate to start my zoo where my house currently is in Sunset Park, I would be told “no, you can’t have a zoo there it’s not zoned for that, sorry”. And that would be the final answer. It’s upsetting that this requirement seems to only affect the regular people and not large corporate developers. … yet all the projects in Sunset Park are able to debate zoning requirements.

Santa Monica City CouncilJanuary 13, 2026

Santa Monica City Council
January 13, 2026