3. Minimum Front Setback. If a lot split results in a front parcel line that is adjacent to an alley, no more than 4 feet is required.
4. Minimum Side and Rear Setbacks.
a. 4 feet, except in the following circumstances:
i. In the case of a lot split, no setback shall be required from the newly created interior parcel line for permitted projects pursuant to this Section, provided that the structures meet fire and safety standards. ii. Existing structures or structures constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions may retain nonconforming setbacks.
12.C.b
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: Attachment B - August 15, 2025 Technical Assistance Request to HCD (7600 : Amendments to City's "SB 9" Ordinance to Align F. Parking. One parking space is required per unit established pursuant to this Section, except no parking is required if any of the following applies:
1. The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a highquality transit corridor, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop, as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code; or
2. There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel.
G. Guaranteed Units. Unless denied pursuant to (C)(4), above, and notwithstanding standards set forth within this Section or the underlying zoning district, no objective zoning, subdivision, or design standard shall have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two units of at least 1,500 square feet of floor area on a parcel, or in the event of a lot split pursuant to the Section, either of the resulting parcels.
I. Lease Terms. Units created under this section shall not be used for rental terms of 30 days or less.
J. Development Impact Fees.
1. Applicability of Chapter 9.64, Affordable Housing Production Program.
Permitted projects under this Section are exempt from the affordable housing fee pursuant to Chapter 9.64.
2. Applicability of Chapter 9.65, Childcare Linkage Program, Chapter 9.66, Transportation Impact Fee Program, and Chapter 9.67, Parks & Recreation Development Impact Fee Program. Fees pursuant to Chapter 9.65, Chapter 9.66, and Chapter 9.67 shall be required for units created under this Section.
Section 9.31.140 General Markets in Residential Districts.
12.C.b
Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: Attachment B - August 15, 2025 Technical Assistance Request to HCD (7600 : Amendments to City's "SB 9" Ordinance to Align 1 Ross Fehrman
From: Yung, Brandon@HCD <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2025 9:38 AM
To: Ross Fehrman; Michelle M. Hugard
Cc: Heaton, Brian@HCD; Coy, Melinda@HCD; Zisser, David@HCD Subject: Santa Monica HCD Request for Technical Assistance, Case HAU-2405
EXTERNAL
Hello Ross,
Thank you for submitting your request for technical assistance to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) regarding Government Code sections 66411.7 and 65852.21 (SB 9). This email memorializes the meeting between HCD and the City on November 3, 2025.
As was stated during the meeting, HCD finds nothing in state law that would prohibit the City from establishing an infill subdivision ordinance that is separate from, more permissive than, and not intended to implement SB9. If the City adopts such an ordinance, HCD encourages the City to ensure that the two distinct pathways – the local infill subdivision ordinance and the SB 9 pathway – are clear.
Thank you,
Brandon Yung
Housing Policy Analyst
Division of Housing Policy Development
Housing Accountability Unit
Phone: (916) 562-5948
Housing & Community Development
651 Bannon Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95811
12.C.c
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: Attachment C - November 6, 2025 HCD Technical Assistance Response (7600 : Amendments to City's "SB 9" Ordinance to Align 1 David Yakobson
From: Leslie Lambert <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2026 12:19 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Lana Negrete Subject: Item 12C
EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers:
I am writing this as a resident of Santa Monica and not as a representative of the Planning Commission.
I strongly encourage you to follow the direction of the Planning Commission in its recommendation that the minimum size of units to be developed under the new ordinance not be set at 1,500 SF. Instead it should remain at 800SF.
There are several reasons for this 6-1 Commission vote, which I will discuss below. Unfortunately, the staff report does not provide you with a discussion of how the Commission reached this conclusion.
Hopefully my points will help clear that up.
1. The major objective of SB9 and any ordinance the City adopts is to create more affordable opportunities for residency in R1 neighborhoods. The result of setting a minimum unit size at 1,500 will create a situation that is the diametric opposite of that objective. Units of this size will be far more costly to build, and their prices will reflect that. This will limit the number of potential buyers or renters to those making far more annual income than required for a smaller unit. There will also be fewer units built.
2. There is nothing in State or local law that prohibits a competent developer from building 1,500 SF units in these projects. Or larger for that matter if a market exists. But the point remains that the market will be smaller than that for smaller units and will not reach the broader market that would benefit from living in R1 neighborhoods.
3. If redressing racial and ethnic disparities created by past restrictive covenants and red-lining is one of the City's objectives, then developing units less than 1,500 SF is a far more effective way to meet this objective because these units are less costly and therefore available to a bigger market.
4. Providing new family housing is an important City objective. However, because of fair housing laws, there can be no discrimination based on household type in these projects.
5. "Affordable" as it relates to units created by SB9 or the proposed local does not have the traditional meaning as affordable tio lower income or middle income households, the latter being households with annual incomes that do not exceed 200% of AMA.
As a side note, all of Santa Monica has been designated by the State as a "high resource area" with only two census tracts considered a rung lower in resource availability. There are many reasons for this, not the least of which is access to the city's excellent local schools. This is not to say, of course, that the city is not economically and racially segregated. This has much to do with the high land prices in the city.
Item 12-C
April 14, 2026
Item 12-C
April 14, 2026
12.C.d
Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: Written Comments (7600 : Amendments to City's "SB 9" Ordinance to Align with State Law) 2 SB9 has been a failure statewide in its objective to increase access to housing opportunities in R1 districts. Hopefully our joint efforts will reverse this trend.
Leslie Lambert
Item 12-C
April 14, 2026
Item 12-C
April 14, 2026
12.C.d
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: Written Comments (7600 : Amendments to City's "SB 9" Ordinance to Align with State Law) 3 David Yakobson
From: Santa Monica Forward <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2026 9:31 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Ellis Raskin; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; councilmtgitems; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Amend Item 12.C, the SB9 Implementation Ordinance
EXTERNAL
Mayor and Councilmembers,
The reversion of Santa Monica’s SB9 implementation ordinance to state standards will effectively make it unusable, further preventing the creation of relatively affordable townhomes in single family zones. To make this ordinance usable, it must provide for more generous minimum unit sizes of 1,500 square feet, as opposed to only 800, which was agreed upon by council previously. Further, owner-occupancy requirements mean that few or no projects will be proposed, as it is extremely challenging and risky for individual homeowners with no development experience to build multiple additional units on their lots. The city should eliminate the owneroccupancy requirement, as it previously voted to do.
While the above suggestions are crucial to making SB9 deliver new housing in the city, we understand that a local ordinance is likely required to implement these changes. In that case, Forward recommends moving forward on 4/14/26 with changes that can be made through the implementation ordinance, while crafting a local ordinance to achieve the desired results alongside the local ordinance for SB1123.
Sincerely,
Sam Shapiro-Kline and Brad Ewing
Co-Chairs, Santa Monica Forward
--
We are working for a diverse, progressive, sustainable and equitable Santa Monica.
SantaMonicaForward.org
Item 12-C
April 14, 2026
Item 12-C
April 14, 2026
12.C.d
Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: Written Comments (7600 : Amendments to City's "SB 9" Ordinance to Align with State Law) 1 David Yakobson
From: Nikki Kolhoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 10:49 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: April 14, 2026 City Council - Item 12C - OPPOSE Upzoning
EXTERNAL
Dear City Council -
I oppose any changes to our zoning code that go beyond state law.
1. There are so many new laws being passed, for which we don't know the impacts or outcomes.
We need to see how implementation goes before adding more.
2. There is no analysis or evidence that the proposed changes will make Santa Monica affordable.
3. Given the current political environment with state housing laws, once we make a change to increase height and density, it will be harder to go back when we learn it was a mistake.
4. While the purported reason for the increase in square footage is to create "family housing", there is no requirement that any of this actually be family housing. The only certainty is they will be market rate.
5. Many lots are so small that it isn't possible to build four 1500 sqft units without demolishing the existing structure, which incentivizes demolition and displacement and the destruction of existing neighborhoods.
6. We know we cannot trust this developer-endorsed council, so the next change we can expect to be proposed is the elimination of height/story and setback limitations in order to fit these larger units on small lots, which also alters the character of the neighborhood in violation of the LUCE.
7. The Planning Commission, your appointed experts on this subject, already told you not to do this.
Please stop filling the city council agenda with things residents don't want or need, and that we didn't ask for. You are wasting our time by forcing us to respond to your bad proposals.
Regards,
Nikki Kolhoff
ps. Release the Uller Report.
Item 12-C
April 14, 2026
Item 12-C
April 14, 2026
12.C.d
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: Written Comments (7600 : Amendments to City's "SB 9" Ordinance to Align with State Law) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.A
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Appointments to one unscheduled and one scheduled vacancy on the Building & Fire-Life Safety Commission for terms ending on June 30, 2028. (Continued from 03/24/2026)
Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Applicant List
16.A
Packet Pg. 801
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Building & Fire-Life Safety Commission
Name Application Date
Andrews, Mark D. 01/09/2026
Carrigan, Bryan 04/08/2026
Helms, Williams S. 09/30/2025
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 3
16.A.a
Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 1] (7632 : 16.A. Appointments to the Building & Fire-Life Safety Commission (5 mins.)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.B
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Appointment to one scheduled vacancy on the Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee for a term ending on June 30, 2029. (Continued from 03/24/2026)
Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Applicant List
16.B
Packet Pg. 803
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee
Name Application Date
Gerwitz, Richard* 10/07/2025
Lazar, Alexander* 03/26/2026
Waterfall, Dave* 06/18/2025
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 3
* Ineligible
16.B.b
Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 1] (7633 : 16.B. Appointment to the Measure GS Resident Oversight Committee (5 mins.)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.C
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Personnel Board for a term ending on June 30, 2027. (Continued from 03/24/2026)
Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Applicant List
16.C
Packet Pg. 805
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Personnel Board
Name Application Date
Betancourt, Karen 07/14/2025
Smith, Christopher J. 03/10/2026
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 2
16.C.a
Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: Applicant List (7634 : 16.C. Appointment to the Personnel Board (5 mins.)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.D
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Appointments to one scheduled and two unscheduled vacancies on the Transient Occupancy Tax Advisory Committee for terms ending on June 30, 2027. (Continued from 03/24/2026)
Prepared By: Mitchell Kois, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Applicant List
16.D
Packet Pg. 807
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Transit Occupancy Tax Advisory Committee
Name Application Date
Boyhan, Bryan P* 05/08/2025
Carrigan, Bryan MBA 04/09/2026
Ginsburg, Scott A 11/07/2025
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 2
* Ineligible
16.D.b
Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 1] (7638 : 16.D. Appointments to TOTAC (5 mins.)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.E
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Recreation and Parks Commission for a term ending on June 30, 2027. (Continued from 03/24/2026)
Prepared By: Mitchell Kois, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Applicant List
B. Written Comments
16.E
Packet Pg. 809
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Recreation and Parks Commission
Name
Badawy, Adam
Barba-Padilla, Bee
Bauer, Jessica
Campbell, Daniel
Ewing, Bradley
Goldenberg, Matthew
Kolhoff, Nikki
Mirhashemi, Jaleh
Sullivan, Thomas
Application Date
07/25/2025
10/29/2025
02/22/2026
02/04/2026
10/22/2025
03/05/2026
06/12/2025
06/03/2025
08/09/2025
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 9
16.E.a
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: Applicant List (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Cindy Bendat <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2026 3:35 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi; Council Mailbox Subject: April 14, 2026 meeting, Item 16e - Appointment of Matt Goldenberg to the Recreation and Parks CommissionEXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis, Councimembers, and City Manager:
I am writing in support of Matt Goldenberg's application to serve on the Santa Monica Recreation and Parks Commission. This will be discussed on April 14th in Item 16e.
I have gotten to know Matt because we are both on the Board of Directors of the North of Montana Association, and I have been impressed with his ability to research and analyze different matters, to be proactive with ideas on how to address and solve those issues, and to build consensus. Matt took on a leadership role with NOMA when he agreed to step up as Co-Chair and to lead the effort to have natural grass rather than artificial turf at school fields.
As a physician, he will bring a unique perspective on the value of parks and green space to our health and well being. Finally, Matt is also involved with the Great Park Coalition, our once-in-a-lifetime legacy opportunity to create something incredible for ourselves and for future generations to enjoy. Great cities have great parks.
In addition, as a native Santa Monican who grew up here, went to the local schools, and now has two children in Santa Monica public schools, I know he is committed to Santa Monica and making it the best place it can be.
I have no doubt he will be an asset to the Recreation and Parks Commission, and I encourage you to appoint him to the position.
Thank you.
Cindy Bendat, 35 year resident
NOMA Board member
Advisory Board member, Airport2Park and the Great Park Coalition Former two-term Board member of the Santa Monica Pier Corporation
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Matt Goldenberg D.O. <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2026 12:12 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Cc: Micah Akerson; Tony Lopez; Jenny Rogers; Oliver Chi Subject: Agenda Item 16E: Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Recreation and Parks Commission
EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Members of the Santa Monica City Council, There are applicants who want to serve on the Recreation and Parks Commission because they love parks. I want to serve because I owe them something.
I grew up half a block from Lincoln Middle School, in a townhome without a yard. Our parks were not a luxury for my family — they were the backyard we didn't have. They shaped me in ways I am still discovering, and that personal debt is not incidental to my interest in this commission. It is the foundation of it.
I am a physician, a parent of two daughters, and a lifelong Santa Monica resident — and I believe that combination of perspectives is precisely what this commission needs at this moment.
As a physician, I bring something to this commission that few others can: a clinical grounding in the public health case for green space. The evidence is unambiguous — access to parks reduces stress, improves mental health outcomes, and strengthens the social bonds that hold communities together. I will be the voice in the room who ensures that our decisions are not just well-intentioned, but evidencebased. And I will keep asking the equity question that the data demands: studies consistently show that residents who live within walking distance of a park have measurably better health outcomes than those who do not. Access to quality parks and programming should be equally distributed across Santa Monica's neighborhoods, and closing that gap is not just good policy. It is a moral obligation — and one I intend to keep at the center of this commission's work.
As a neighborhood leader, I bring a tested record of turning disagreement into alignment. As Co-Chair of NOMA, I helped to build a coalition of neighbors, advocates, and stakeholders with competing interests and moved them toward a single, clear vision — natural grass on all public land in Santa Monica. That effort required patience, persistence, and a willingness to listen to people I didn't always agree with. It also required holding firm when it mattered. Those are the skills this commission needs, not just to advance the Parks Vision Plan, but to do so in a way the whole community can get behind.
That plan represents a genuinely extraordinary opportunity — a once-in-a-generation chance to build a Great Park, activate every park in the city with arts, culture, and programming, and connect every neighborhood to green space and clean air. Santa Monica has earned its reputation as a national leader Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 2 in environmental sustainability. Our parks should not just reflect that leadership — they should extend it, in the habitats we protect, the materials we choose, and the standard we set for cities across the region.
What I offer is not just enthusiasm for parks. It is a physician's discipline, a coalition-builder's patience, and a neighbor's personal stake in getting this right. If appointed, I will bring all three to every meeting, every decision, and every conversation — in service of the Santa Monica that future generations will be proud, privileged, and grateful to call home.
Thank you for your consideration, for taking the time to speak with me over the past few weeks and for your continued service to this city.
Warmly,
Matt Goldenberg D.O.
Board Cerified, General and Addiction Psychiatry
Father of Two Daughters in SMMUSD Schools
NOMA, Co-Chair
Great Park Coalition Advisory Committee Member
Lifelong Resident of Santa Monica, Roosevelt, Lincoln, SAMO (Class of 2002) Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Heather Thomason <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2026 10:23 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Cc: Caroline Torosis; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Re: Agenda Item 16E — Letter of Recommendation for Matt Goldenberg, Recreation and Parks Commission
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
EXTERNAL
Dear Members of the City Council,
I am writing to offer my strongest possible recommendation for Matt Goldenberg’s appointment to the Santa Monica Recreation and Parks Commission. I have had the privilege of observing Matt as he worked on issues that matter deeply to our community, and I can say without hesitation that he is exactly the kind of person we need serving in an advisory role to our City Council.
Matt is an exceptionally intelligent person who grasps complex policy quickly and thoroughly. He does not simply skim the surface of an issue—he digs into the details, asks the right questions, and arrives at well-reasoned positions. His ability to think on his feet is remarkable. In meetings and public forums, I have watched him absorb new information in real time, synthesize it, and offer ideas that are both creative and grounded in practical reality. He consistently brings excellent ideas to the table, the kind that move conversations forward and open up possibilities others may not have considered.
What sets Matt apart, though, is how he works with people. Community issues in Santa Monica often involve deeply held and diverging points of view, and I have seen Matt navigate those dynamics with extraordinary skill. He listens carefully, treats every perspective with respect, and has a genuine talent for finding consensus where others see only division. He does not shy away from disagreement, but he approaches it with a collaborative spirit that brings people together rather than pushing them apart. That quality is invaluable on any commission, and especially on one that serves such a broad cross-section of our residents.
I have seen all of these qualities in action through Matt’s tireless advocacy for the use of real grass instead of synthetic turf in our city’s parks and recreational spaces. This is an issue he has pursued with passion, persistence, and an impressive command of the research and policy considerations involved. He has shown up, done the work, engaged stakeholders on all sides, and made a compelling case—all while maintaining the kind of positive, constructive attitude that earns the respect of allies and opponents alike. His dedication to this cause is a window into the kind of commissioner he will be: thorough, Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 2 passionate, collaborative, and relentless in his commitment to getting things right for Santa Monica.
Beyond his direct contributions, Matt is the kind of civic participant who inspires others to get involved. His enthusiasm is contagious, and his example demonstrates that engaged, thoughtful residents can make a real difference in how our city is governed. Appointing Matt to the Recreation and Parks Commission would not only add a tremendous asset to the body itself—it would send a signal that Santa Monica values the kind of dedication and good faith he represents.
I urge you in the strongest terms to appoint Matt Goldenberg. You will be so pleased with your decision. And if you pass on him, I believe you will be missing out on one of the most capable, thoughtful, and dedicated people you could have serving this community.
Sincerely,
Heather Thomason
Santa Monica Resident
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 3 David Yakobson
From: Ellen Hannan <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2026 11:50 AM
To: Clerk Mailbox; councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16c vacancy recommendation Matt Goldenberg Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
EXTERNAL
Santa Monica Council Members:
I strongly support Matt Goldenberg to fill the open vacancy for the Parks and Recreation Commission. He has demonstrated an open mind, dedication and leadership.
Ellen Hannan
1218 9th St #6
Santa Monica CA 90401
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 4 David Yakobson
From: Susan Hannan <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2026 1:42 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Goldenberg for Recreation and Parks Commission Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
EXTERNAL
Santa Monica Council Members:
I strongly support Matt Goldenberg to fill the open vacancy for the Parks and Recreation Commission. He has demonstrated an open mind, dedication and leadership.
Susan Hannan
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 7 David Yakobson
From: Bruce Leddy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2026 1:04 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: 16E - Matt Goldenberg Endorsement
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and City Council MembersI'm writing to enthusiastically support Matt Goldenberg's appointment to the Recreation and Parks Commission (Item 16E, March 24th). Matt's enthusiasm, dedication, and intelligence so impressed the NOMA Board that we quickly vaulted him from member, to Board, to Vice Chair, to now serving as my Co-Chair in short order. We recognized that Matt is a natural leader who is thorough and thoughtful, who listens and finds common ground that brings people together, and whose commitment to this City is unwavering. Santa Monica would be lucky to have his talents at Rec & Parks.
As a quick example of Matt's abilities: one of the other neighborhood leaders brought up the cause of keeping grass fields in Santa Monica, instead of converting to artificial turf. Matt – a father of two kids who use the parks and school fields regularly – took up the cause and rallied all 7 of the neighborhood groups to sign on to a letter advocating for a moratorium on artificial turf on public property. Getting all 7 groups to agree on ANYTHING is a near impossible task (trust me, I've only been able to do it once), but Matt was able to use his persuasive abilities, and his flexibility in hearing others' concerns, to quickly reach consensus. After Council passed a resolution about turf, Matt did not declare "mission accomplished." He continues to rally parents and residents to push SMMUSD to change its plans for turf at our public school fields.
This example shows Matt's abilities both as a leader who can organize and inspire people to champion a cause, and his tenacious commitment to parks and recreation in the City.
In the years I have served as a Board member and Chair at NOMA, I can say that it is rare to find someone who combines a passion for making things better, with a sensitivity to other perspectives.
That's what makes Matt a great member of our team and what will make him an outstanding Commissioner at Rec & Parks. I hope you will give him your full support.
Bruce Leddy
Co-Chair, NOMA
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 8 David Yakobson
From: Annspun <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2026 3:15 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Recommendation for Recreation of Recreation and Parks Commission Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
EXTERNAL
Good afternoon Mayor Torosis and Members of the Santa Monica City Council,
I highly recommend Matt Goldenberg for commissioner for your unscheduled vacancy on the Recreation and Parks Commission.
I have become acquainted with Matt as a fellow board member of NOMA, our North of Montana Association neighborhood group.
Like Lana Negrete, he shares a background of growing up in Santa Monica and continues to infuse his love of Santa Monica into all aspects of making our city the best it can be, now and for future generations.
Matt is enthusiastic and well versed in city government, education and business, all necessary for a successful city to thrive! He not only studies the issues but is an authentic listener and problem solver.
Matt cares, shares and dares to enthusiastically think outside the box.
His involvement has earned my trust and respect.
Respectfully,
Ann Greenspun
SM Resident, 49 years
RN, 1984 Olympics (Coliseum)
Twentieth Century Fox and Prospect Studios, Walt Disney Company Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 9 Past Chair, Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce
Past Board Member, Bayside District Corporation (now Downtown Santa Monica)
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 10 David Yakobson
From: Tricia Crane <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2026 3:47 PM
To: Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Council meeting of 3/24/2026 - Agenda Item 16E: Support for Matt Goldenberg to be appointed to the unscheduled vacancy on the Recreation and Parks Commission Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor Torosis and Members of the Santa Monica City Council, We enthusiastically support and ask the Council to appoint Matt Goldenberg to the open seat on the Recreation & Parks Commission.
We know Matt through his good work as a leader in the growing coalition supporting a commitment to a future when natural grass will be the healthy and safe standard for all public land in Santa Monica.
Matt has worked hard to build consensus around the need to expand green space in our city. He is also highly regarded for his enthusiastic participation in the Neighborhood Council.
Santa Monica will be well served by Matt as a member of the Recreation & Parks Commission.
The Board of Northeast Neighbors
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 11 David Yakobson
From: Elizabeth Van Denburgh <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2026 5:31 PM
To: Caroline Torosis; Lana Negrete; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; councilmtgitems
Cc: Micah Akerson; Tony Lopez; Jenny Rogers; Oliver Chi Subject: 2/24/26 City Council Mtg., Agenda Item 16E : Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Recreation and Parks Commission; I supported Matt Goldenberg Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
EXTERNAL
Mayor Torosis and City Council Members,
As the Wilmont chair I have been working with Matt Goldenberg, NOMA co-chair, as part of the Neighborhood Council meetings. He is a natural leader who likes to focus on clear objectives and looks to bring as many people into the tent as reasonable. I find him interested in many things about the city and mostly, interested in the residents and their children. I can say from my times working with him on the Turf discussions with the city and school district I believe he brings a logical and resident focus that is refreshing.
I support Matt Goldenberg to be appointed to the Santa Monica Parks and Recreation commission for the unscheduled vacancy outlined in Agenda Item 16E.
Many thanks,
Elizabeth Van Denburgh
Wilmont Chair
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 2 David Yakobson
From: Council Mailbox
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2026 9:15 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: FW: ITEM 16-E RECREATION AND PARKS COMMISSION OPENING From: phillis dudick <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2026 1:07 PM
To: Council Mailbox <[email protected]>
Subject: ITEM 16-E RECREATION AND PARKS COMMISSION OPENING
EXTERNAL
Honorable Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers:
Matt Goldenberg has expressed a deep interest in serving on the Santa Monica Recreation and Parks Commission.
Matt has two young children at Franklin Elementary School, where he and his wife are involved in volunteer community leadership. Matt understands the importance of the commission's role in guiding the road forward for Santa Monica's children and residents of all ages.
Matt has also taken on a leadership role as co-chair of NOMA, has Santa Monica roots, and a passion to serve our City.
Sincerely,
Phillis Dudick
Santa Monica Resident
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Andrew Hoyer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2026 2:53 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Dan Hall; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Natalya Zernitskaya; Barry Snell
Subject: 03-24-26 CC Agenda Item 16-E
EXTERNAL
Councilmembers,
In light of your recent decision to approve the Master Park Plan and not only include the ban on artificial turf in our parks but insert dialog insisting on its replacement with natural grass at the end of its lifespan, the obvious choice for a new Parks and Recreation Commissioner would be Matt Goldberg. He shepherded a resolution through numerous organizations so that you were presented with one loud voice preferring nature over petroleum products thus creating carbon sinks instead of footprints. I believe he will do a fine job of preserving this choice going forward.
Sincerely,
Andrew Hoyer
SMMCN Board President
There is only one moment in time when it is essential to awaken. That moment is now. - Buddha
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) 1 David Yakobson
From: Elizabeth Lerer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2026 11:07 AM
To: Caroline Torosis; Ellis Raskin; Lana Negrete; Natalya Zernitskaya; Dan Hall; Barry Snell; Jesse Zwick
Cc: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16.E. Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Recreation and Parks Commission
EXTERNAL
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
I cannot imagine you appointing anyone better than Matt Goldenberg to the Recreation & Parks Commission.
Please appoint Matt!
Thank you,
Elizabeth Lerer
Resident of Santa Monica
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
Item 16-E
April 14, 2026
16.E.c
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7637 : 16.E. Appointment to Recreation and Parks Commission (5 mins.)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.F
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Appointment to one unscheduled vacancy on the Housing Authority Board for a term ending on June 30, 2026. (Continued from 03/24/2026) Prepared By: Mitchell Kois, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Applicant List
16.F
Packet Pg. 826
City of Santa Monica
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Housing Authority Board
Name Application Date
Badawy, Adam* 02/28/2026
Giolito, Robert S.* 02/05/2026
Helms, William S.* 09/30/2025
White, Jack M, III 3/23/2026
TOTAL APPLICANTS: 3
* Ineligible
16.F.a
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: Applicant List [Revision 1] (7636 : 16.F. Appointment to Housing Authority Board (5 mins.)) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.G
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Denise Anderson Warren, Interim City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department
Subject: Recommendation to accept Joseph Antognini's resignation from the Disabilities Commission and authorize the City Clerk to publish the vacancy Prepared By: David Yakobson, Staff Assistant III
Approved Forwarded to Council
16.G
Packet Pg. 828
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.H
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Oliver Chi, City Manager, City Manager's Office
Subject: Request of Councilmember Hall, Mayor Pro Tempore Zwick, and Mayor Torosis that the Council direct Staff to update the City’s Responsible AI Use policy, direct the procurement of one or more enterprise AI systems, incorporate AI upskilling into staff training, and commit to a policy of workforce protection
Prepared By: Sergio Ramirez, Chief of Staff
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. 20260414 16 Item - Encouraging Responsible AI Use - Hall, Zwick, Torosis B. Written Comments
16.H
Packet Pg. 829
Meeting: April 14, 2026
16 ITEM BY COUNCILMEMBER DAN HALL, MAYOR PRO TEMPORE ZWICK, AND
MAYOR CAROLINE TOROSIS
Request of Councilmember Hall, Mayor Pro Tempore Zwick, and Mayor Torosis that the Council direct Staff to update the City’s Responsible AI Use policy, direct the procurement of one or more enterprise AI systems, incorporate AI upskilling into staff training, and commit to a policy of workforce protection.
The City of Santa Monica has long been recognized as one of California's most forward-thinking and innovative municipalities. Today, that reputation demands engagement with one of the most transformative technological shifts in a generation: the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI). AI is no longer an emerging technology on the horizon. It is already reshaping how work gets done across every sector of the economy, and residents deserve a municipal government that meets this moment thoughtfully and responsibly. The question for the City is not whether to engage with AI.
The question is whether we shape its use deliberately, with strong values and resident and worker protections embedded from the start, or let it arrive without guardrails.
The Private Sector Has Already Moved
The pace of AI adoption in the private sector has been staggering. Generative AI is now regularly used in at least one function by 78% of organizations, up from 55% in 2024.1 38% of knowledge workers use generative AI in their daily work, and 65% of enterprises increased their AI budgets this year with a median year-over-year increase of 22%.2 The productivity gains are equally striking: research from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis suggests generative AI may have increased aggregate U.S. labor productivity by as much as 1.3% since its introduction,3 a meaningful shift at macroeconomic scale.
The gap between organizations that embrace AI and those that do not is widening. The World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report finds that 86% of employers expect AI and information processing technologies to significantly transform their business by 2030.4 Government agencies that fail to adopt these tools risk delivering slower, costlier, and less responsive services than the residents and businesses of Santa Monica expect and deserve.
Despite this momentum in the private sector, a report from the Center for Democracy and Technology found that approximately 21 cities and counties across the 4 https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_Report_2025.pdf 3 https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2025/nov/state-generative-ai-adoption-2025 2 https://medhacloud.com/blog/ai-adoption-statistics-2026 1 https://www.netguru.com/blog/ai-adoption-statistics
16.H.a
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: 20260414 16 Item - Encouraging Responsible AI Use - Hall, Zwick, Torosis (7674 : Responsible AI Use) 16 ITEM BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, MAYOR PRO TEMPORE ZWICK, AND MAYOR
TOROSIS
Responsible AI Use
nation have public-facing AI use policies.5 Santa Monica, which has already taken the important step of adopting a basic Responsible AI Policy, is positioned to go further and faster than nearly every city in the country.
AI as a Talent Strategy
Santa Monica competes with some of the most innovative employers in the world for public sector talent. Only 37% of public sector employees say their organization has a clear AI strategy, compared to 53% in the private sector, 6 a gap that signals to
prospective and current employees which organizations are investing in the future and which are not. Many employees who have access to AI still do not use it because they do not see how the tools apply to their work, underscoring the importance of active, structured training rather than passive access alone.
The labor market reality is clear: AI and big data are among the fastest-growing skill sets, and AI and machine learning specialists rank among the fastest-growing jobs globally.
7 A government agency that does not develop these capacities internally will struggle to attract the next generation of public servants and will risk losing the talented employees it already has to employers who offer more modern, dynamic working environments. In the City’s March 24 update to the Realignment Plan approved by City Council, positions were authorized to re-establish the Santa Monica Institute, City Hall’s learning and development program. Responsible AI use must be included in our curriculum for City employees.
Responsible Adoption Requires Worker Voice and Clear Protections Embracing AI does not mean replacing the people who make Santa Monica’s City Hall work. The City’s approach must be guided by a clear commitment: AI is a tool to enable and empower City employees, not to eliminate jobs or undermine the workforce. Some public agencies across the country are already using AI to handle routine data entry and processing, allowing limited human staff to focus on complex, high-empathy work8 – exactly the kind of reorientation that makes government jobs more fulfilling and more effective.
Employees and their representatives should have a voice in how AI tools are introduced into their workplaces. Workers should know when AI is being used in processes that affect their employment or evaluations. And there must be an accessible 8 https://www.goapgtech.com/post/operational-ai-how-state-local-governments-are-scaling-in-2026 7 https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_Report_2025.pdf 6 https://www.gallup.com/workplace/702983/adoption-rapidly-growing-public-sector.aspx 5 https://cdt.org/insights/ai-in-local-government-how-counties-cities-are-advancing-ai-governance/
16.H.a
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: 20260414 16 Item - Encouraging Responsible AI Use - Hall, Zwick, Torosis (7674 : Responsible AI Use) 16 ITEM BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, MAYOR PRO TEMPORE ZWICK, AND MAYOR
TOROSIS
Responsible AI Use
pathway to raise concerns when AI is being used in ways that feel unfair or harmful.
Santa Monica can model what responsible government AI adoption looks like: tools chosen with care, workers consulted and trained, human judgment preserved where it matters most, and equity built in at the outset.
Updating the City’s Policy Framework and Authorizing an Enterprise Account Across the country, state and local governments introduced 50 public sector AI bills or ordinances in 2025 alone, with risk management, transparency, and accountability emerging as the central areas of focus.9 An updated Responsible AI Use policy should address data privacy and security, appropriate use cases, human oversight of high-stakes decisions, and disclosure obligations, ensuring that Santa Monica's AI use is not only effective but trustworthy and equitable.
Additionally, many City employees currently lack access to secure, enterprise-grade AI platforms. Publicly available versions of tools like Open AI’s ChatGPT or Anthropic’s Claude, for example, may not provide the data privacy protections, administrative controls, or audit capabilities required for responsible government use, especially for sensitive data like personally identifiable information.
Authorizing the procurement of an enterprise account would provide City staff with a policy-compliant, institutionally governed platform through which to access these tools safely and consistently.
In order to train, enable, and upskill our City workforce and protect workers against replacement,
WE THEREFORE MOVE THAT THE COUNCIL:
1. Direct the City Manager to:
1.1. Review and update the City's Responsible AI Policy to reflect the current state of AI technology and usage by City employees, incorporate best practices for data privacy, security, transparency, human oversight, and accountability, and establish clear guidelines that enable responsible and innovative use by City employees at all levels, including explicit prohibitions on use cases the City deems high-risk, a defined list of data categories that may not be processed by AI systems without Council authorization, and a requirement that any AI-assisted decision affecting a resident's access to City services include a documented human review step, including explicit prohibitions on use cases the City deems high-risk 9 https://cdt.org/insights/state-legislatures-continued-their-focus-on-public-sector-ai-use-andexpanded-attention-to-risk-management-practices-during-the-2025-legislative-session/
16.H.a
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: 20260414 16 Item - Encouraging Responsible AI Use - Hall, Zwick, Torosis (7674 : Responsible AI Use) 16 ITEM BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, MAYOR PRO TEMPORE ZWICK, AND MAYOR
TOROSIS
Responsible AI Use
and a requirement that any AI-assisted decision affecting a resident's access to City services include a documented human review step.
1.2. Evaluate and, subject to applicable procurement requirements, authorize the purchase of one or more enterprise AI platform accounts to provide City employees with secure, policy-compliant access to AI tools for use in their official duties. Any platform procured shall include contractual guarantees that resident and employee data will not be used to train vendor AI models, and shall provide audit log capabilities accessible to City administrators.
1.3. Develop and incorporate AI literacy and practical skills training into the City's reestablished Santa Monica Institute learning and development programs, and actively encourage the use of AI tools by employees at all levels and across all departments, consistent with an updated Responsible AI Policy and best practices to mitigate bias, recognize hallucinations, and protect resident and employee privacy. Priority enrollment in AI literacy training shall be offered to employees in roles identified as most likely to use AI, and training shall include instruction on employees' rights and the City's workforce protection commitments under an updated policy.
1.4. Establish a clear and enforceable commitment that AI adoption will be used to augment and empower City employees, not to reduce headcount or displace workers. Workforce impact shall be an evaluation criterion in any AI procurement process. Prior to implementing any AI system that would materially change the nature of work performed by a bargaining unit, the City shall fulfill its meet-and-confer obligations and provide an opportunity for meaningful employee input.
1.5. Ensure that AI systems used by City employees are evaluated for fairness, bias, and privacy concerns, especially in matters of public safety, law enforcement, and human resources. AI shall not be used as a primary or determinative factor in decisions affecting resident access to City services, code enforcement actions, hiring or promotion decisions, or public safety functions without explicit policy authorization from the City Manager and notice to Council and the community via public information item.
2. Direct the City Manager to make any appropriate and necessary changes to comply with the above direction.
# # #
16.H.a
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: 20260414 16 Item - Encouraging Responsible AI Use - Hall, Zwick, Torosis (7674 : Responsible AI Use) 1 David Yakobson
From: Alex Elliott
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2026 8:06 PM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 16 Item - Encouraging Responsible AI Use - Hall, Zwick, Torosis Attachments: Disabilities Commission_AI Adhoc letter_Final (1).docx Good evening,
Please post the attached letter as part of the written comment for 16 Item - Encouraging Responsible AI Use - Hall, Zwick, Torosis: Ad hoc committee on Artificial Intelligence Opportunities and Risks:
https://www.santamonica.gov/media/HHS/Commissions/AI%20Adhoc%20letter_2026%200211.pdf Thank you,
Alex Elliott
Chair, Santa Monica Disabilities Commission
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use) February 11th, 2026
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street, Room 209
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Ad hoc committee on Artificial Intelligence Opportunities and Risks Dear Honorable Mayor Caroline Torosis, City Council & City Manager Oliver Chi:
The Disabilities Commission meets monthly to develop recommendations on City policy impacting access to public services from the cradle to the grave. I am reaching out on behalf of the Disabilities Commission to provide recommendations for planning, implementing and governing Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies for all Santa Monica residents, including people with disabilities.
The Disabilities Commission has been following the progress in AI systems over the past few years to understand what opportunities and risks these systems have for people with disabilities in Santa Monica. AI has the potential to benefit people with disabilities in everyday tasks, navigation, communication, education, employment, health, and independent living. Current uses of AI by people with disabilities include assistive technology such as speech recognition and automated captions that can improve communication and access, smart mobility devices for navigating indoor and outdoor spaces, and AI powered medication reminders, shopping lists, and other tasks to aid independent living.
AI poses many potential risks for people with disabilities in employment, education, healthcare, transportation, benefits determination, information and communication, and the legal system.
Across the country, governments at the local, state, and federal level have been studying recent developments in AI and drafting policies for how these tools should and should not be used in governance. For example, in October Governor Newsom signed several bills addressing new and emerging technology, such as AI. On October 1st, 2025, the California Civil Rights Council implemented regulations to protect against potential employment discrimination because of the use of AI, algorithms, and other automated-decision systems. The newly approved regulations provide increased clarity on how existing antidiscrimination laws apply to the use of AI in employment decisions.
AI and algorithmic technologies create outputs based on inputs, which are derived from datasets (sometimes referred to as “training data”). Oftentimes, training datasets are not an accurate representation of people with disabilities — they may have inaccurate data about disability, undersample or improperly tag information as being related to disability. These factors can all lead to AI tools that can discriminate against disabled people and contribute to negative outcomes. Ensuring that people with disabilities are centered in the creation, deployment, and auditing of these technologies and of the policies that govern them can help to mitigate the risks of these tools.
The Disabilities Commission recommends the City Manager and City Council take the following steps to improve the opportunities and minimize the risks of Artificial Intelligence technologies:
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use)
1. Include the ADA Coordinator in the procurement and implementation of AI technologies.
The ADA coordinator should receive training on the potential risks and benefits of AI and be included in the procurement, implementation, and evaluation of AI.
2. Explore use of AI tools to improve the accessibility of the City's websites, applications, and digital assets
April 24, 2026 marks the compliance date for the new rule on the Accessibility of Web Content and Mobile Apps Provided by State and Local Governments to conform with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Level AA. We recommend City IT staff explore AI technologies to create accessible digital assets and spaces. For example, 1) Use of AI to support development of alternative text (alt-text) for images or captioning on its website. Some residents rely on screen readers to understand the contents of a webpage, but screen readers can typically only understand images with alt-text. 2) Use of AI tools to help to audit and remediate documents with accessibility issues. Many important municipal documents are delivered in PDF format (e.g., the agenda and minutes for City Council meetings). PDF files with accessibility issues can be very expensive and time consuming to remediate compared to other formats such as HTML. AI tools could be used to identify WCAG issues before documents are uploaded to a website’s document library. Explore using AI tools to support efforts to convert high volumes of PDF documents to HTML, as well as the potential use of AI-enhanced captioning, transcription services, and document summaries into plain language. The city needs to take responsibility for providing accessible services even if AI changes how residents access services.
3. Collaborate with the Disabilities Commission and residents with disabilities in the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of AI Policies AI is evolving and changing rapidly, as the City develops its AI plans, keep in mind that the Disability Commission is always available to advise, collaborate, and answer questions about potential risks and benefits of AI. In other words:
nothing about us without us. The Disabilities Commission invites city staff to our public hearing on July 8th, 2026, to continue the collaboration.
4. Improve access to Information, Communication, and Technology (ICT) (Hardware, Software, Telecommunications networks) for assistive technologies powered by AI
The cost of the hardware, software, and connectivity for assistive technologies powered by AI Technologies remain a barrier for many residents with disabilities.
It is critical to improve efforts to increase access to the devices, software, and broadband needed to access assistive technology features that promote independence. For example, the statewide California Broadband for All efforts to reduce the digital divide and other programs that lower the cost of access.
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use)
5. Disclose the Use of AI; Minimize Bias; Monitor and Assess People with disabilities need to know when and how AI is being used so they can assess whether they may be unintentionally or especially impacted. AI data systems must be trained with diverse datasets that include representation of people with disabilities to minimize bias. The city needs to continuously monitor and assess AI technologies for impacts on people with disabilities.
6. Learn from other environments and share lessons learned For example, CA Department of Technology - Artificial Intelligence Community, U.S. Access Board, Pacific ADA Center, City Connect, and others.
The Commission would like to thank the Council and City staff for always keeping the interests of people with disabilities in mind during planning and execution of City projects and objectives. The Disabilities Commission believes all Santa Monica residents should have full and equal access and a voice in City decision making, which promotes belonging and equity in our community. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Santa Monica Disabilities Commission
Alex Elliott, Chair
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use) 1 David Yakobson
From: Shawn Landres <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 11:48 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: 16-H
Attachments: Op-Ed- AI already Is in Your Public Comment. Santa Monica Should Have Something .pdf
EXTERNAL
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use) By: Shawn Landres
Date: April 14, 2026
Image via Freepic.
Shawn Landres PhD, a Senior Fellow at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, is a secondterm Santa Monica Planning Commissioner and former chair of the Planning and Social Services commissions. The views expressed here are his own.
OPINION
Op/Ed: AI already Is in Your Public Comment.
Santa Monica Should Have Something to Say
About That.
Santa MonicaNEXT
https://santamonicanext.org/2026/04/op-ed-ai-already-is-in-yoment-santa-monica-should-have-something-to-say-about-that/ 4/14/26, 11:45 AM
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use) Tonight the City Council takes up a proposal from Mayor Torosis and Councilmembers Hall and Zwick to make Santa Monica a national model for responsible AI use in local government. The item would update the City’s AI policy, authorize enterprise AI accounts, embed AI training in the reestablished Santa Monica Institute, and commit the City to protecting workers from displacement.
Clearly there is a pressing need to address how the City uses AI. But AI already is reaching the City: through the public comments, letters, and increasingly the phone lines that shape every decision the Council and its commissions make.
Council ought to consider not only how the City uses AI, but also how AI might be using the City.
Last December, the Planning Commission unanimously took up my call to delay a vote on housing subdivision rules because the public had not had enough time to weigh in. I told residents: “Tell us what you think. We will read your comments and take them seriously, all of them, even if we disagree with them.”
They did. In advance of our March 4 study session, we received more than 250 public comments, many within 24 hours of the meeting. I analyzed the packet with AI, asking which letters departed from organized templates and which adapted the template to the writer’s own concerns.
AI helped me do my job better. The same technology that helped me read 250 comments also could have written them.
In February, the LA Times revealed that a consultant used CiviClick, an AI platform, to generate over 20,000 opposition messages to the South Coast Air Quality Management District, targeting clean air rules expected to prevent 2,500 premature deaths. Three of five purported commenters had no knowledge of the letters. The board voted 7-5 to reject the rules. When residents cannot trust that public comments come from actual people, civic engagement stops connecting communities to decision-makers and starts connecting algorithms to the public record.
The quieter problem may prove harder to fix. A Stanford-led study found that every large language model tested for summarizing public comments scored majority positions higher than https://santamonicanext.org/2026/04/op-ed-ai-already-is-in-yoment-santa-monica-should-have-something-to-say-about-that/ 4/14/26, 11:45 AM
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use) minority ones. It is one thing for a disabilities commission to use AI to disaggregate sidewalk mobility experiences — that is precision. It is bias when an AI tool, in search of coherence at the expense of accuracy, treats more numerous homeowner comments as more representative than renter comments, or flattens the comments of Spanish-speaking families and workers into a summary that mirrors the majority view.
Five reforms would address how AI reaches City Hall from the outside. First, require any body using AI to summarize public comments to disclose the tools and parameters used to build the summaries; the Little Hoover Commission’s 2024 report calls for this transparency. Second, publish a model anti-bias prompt and agendize it for discussion and approval; the choices in a summarization prompt are policy decisions, and policy decisions belong in open session. Third, mandate disclosure of AI-generated comments, following campaign finance law’s source-tracing approach for out-of-state contributions. Fourth, track AI equity: who participates, through which channels, and whether the process is reaching the residents it was designed to serve. Fifth, design remote public comment to be easy for humans and hard for AI agents. AI-generated callers eventually could attempt live public comment, but California law prohibits requiring commenters to identify themselves. Friction-based measures like rate limiting and live-connection requirements could help, but the state will need to address this tension directly.
Santa Monica can lead here. The Council’s Tuesday item establishes how the City uses AI responsibly within its own walls. A companion set of policies could establish how the City handles AI when it arrives from outside: in the comment packet, on the phone line, in the summary of what our neighbors said. SB 707 compliance itself belongs in that companion framework: after July 1, AI very likely could be translating agendas, captioning meetings, and processing comments on behalf of the City, and residents deserve to know which tools are doing that work and under what rules. Together, the two frameworks would do what neither does alone:
protect the integrity of the conversation between residents and the government that serves them.
Author
https://santamonicanext.org/2026/04/op-ed-ai-already-is-in-yoment-santa-monica-should-have-something-to-say-about-that/ 4/14/26, 11:45 AM
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use) https://santamonicanext.org/2026/04/op-ed-ai-already-is-in-yoment-santa-monica-should-have-something-to-say-about-that/ 4/14/26, 11:45 AM
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
Item 16-H
April 14, 2026
16.H.b
Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: Written Comments [Revision 1] (7674 : Responsible AI Use) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.I
1 of 2
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Oliver Chi, City Manager, City Manager's Office
Subject: Request by Mayor Torosis that the City Council consider allocating up to $5,000 in Council Discretionary Funds for the City to serve as a Garden Sponsor of The Growing Place’s 40th Anniversary Celebration, to be held on April 18, 2026, at Belmar Park. Mayor Torosis proposes to contribute up to $1,000 from her discretionary funds and requests that other Councilmembers consider contributing equal amounts from their respective discretionary funds to reach a total of $5,000, divided among the accounts of participating Councilmembers.
Background
The Growing Place is a longstanding Santa Monica nonprofit early childhood education organization dedicated to helping children develop into confident, compassionate, and creative problem solvers through a collaborative learning community of children, families, and educators. For over 40 years, the organization has supported working families by providing high-quality, relationship-based early education and fostering social-emotional development and community connection. Supporting its 40th Anniversary Celebration recognizes its contributions to Santa Monica families and aligns with the City’s goals of community well-being, youth development, and access to quality early learning.
Prepared By: Sergio Ramirez, Chief of Staff
Approved Forwarded to Council
16.I
Packet Pg. 843
2 of 2
Attachments:
A. 20260407-Council Discretionary Balance Sheet
16.I
Packet Pg. 844
!"#$%&'()*+,-).
*&(./0'(-#1# 234" #25.&6
)
7 89:;<=>?@ABCDE FGHEIGJ KELHFIM N
O
P Q
R
S
T
UV
Q
WVVXWP
YZ[
\
]
[]^
[ X^UT
_`a b c
WU
T
ad` a
V
Wa_d`aOV_c e a b e a b e a b e a b e a b e a b ea b 1 "$ 31"#f3 g h&g
*(&i"#3,*
j'.
&%
+k.
*&( l$m# 2 n%&'()*+j
*(h1 o"3mp
q1$% ll 4m# 2 n 4m# 2 n 1" 3 31"#f$ rj%s('+t*u(hvwsxyrlh*u(nzu (
l4m# 2 n%&'()*+j
*(h1 o"3mp
q1$, ll 1m# 2 n l 1m# 2 n 1m# 2 n # " $1"#f! r'qq .{*+*-0&'(
*&(,
*q|'(l 1"n l!m# 2 n%&'()*+j
*(h#4 " $mp
q1$p l l1m# 2 nl 1m# 2 nl 1m# 2 nl 1m# 2 nl 1m# 2 nl 1m# 2 n1m# 2 n i i i i v& +1 } " m# 2 e_`a b ~
T
WVVc
U e__ a b e_ a b e_ a b e_ a b e_ a b e_ a b ea b 16.I.a Packet Pg. 845
Attachment: 20260407-Council Discretionary Balance Sheet (7675 : Growing Place Sponsorship Request) City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 14, 2026
Agenda Item: 16.J
1 of 1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Oliver Chi, City Manager, City Manager's Office
Subject: Request of Councilmember Negrete that the City Council consider directing the City Manager to return within 15 days with an implementation plan to create a centralized Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal and coordinated response system that provides immediate, streamlined access to all available City resources for businesses impacted by crime Prepared By: Sergio Ramirez, Chief of Staff
Approved Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. 20260414 16 Item Business Crime Response -
B. Written Comments
16.J
Packet Pg. 846
Meeting: April 14, 2026
1 1 16 ITEM BY COUNCILMEMBERS NEGRETE
2 Request of Councilmember Negrete that the City Council consider directing the 3 City Manager to return within 15 days with an implementation plan to create a 4 centralized Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal and coordinated 5 response system that provides immediate, streamlined access to all available City 6 resources for businesses impacted by crime.
7 8 Background and Purpose
9 Santa Monica businesses impacted by crime are often left navigating a fragmented 10 system — police reporting, repair vendors, grant programs, and safety resources all 11 exist, but are not centralized or easily accessible in moments of need. The result is 12 delays in recovery, increased costs, and frustration for business owners already dealing 13 with disruption.This item is intended to simplify access, accelerate recovery, and 14 improve coordination, ensuring businesses can quickly connect to the resources that 15 already exist.
16 Staff is directed to develop a program with the following components:
17 1. Centralized “One-Click” Business Portal
18 • Create a dedicated, easy-to-find webpage that includes:
19 • Step-by-step guidance immediately following a crime 20 • Direct link to file or reference a police report
21 • Access to the Business Recovery Grant Program (if eligible) 22 • Link to request a free SMPD security assessment
23 • Contact information for rapid City support
24 25 2. Local Vendor Network
26 • Develop and maintain a pre-vetted list of Santa Monica-based vendors, including:
27 o Glass repair
28 o Locksmith services
29 o Graffiti removal
30 o General repairs
31 32 • Provide direct contact access through the portal 33 • Encourage use of local businesses to support the local economy 34 16.J.a
Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: 20260414 16 Item Business Crime Response - (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal) 35 3. Rapid Coordination Trigger
36 Upon report of a qualifying business-related crime:
37 • Automatically provide the business with:
38 o Portal access link
39 o Grant application (if applicable)
40 o Security assessment scheduling
41 42 • Evaluate feasibility of a proactive outreach protocol (City or partner follow-up 43 within 24–48 hours)
44 4. Repeat Impact Flag (Optional Enhancement)
45 • Identify businesses experiencing multiple incidents within a defined timeframe 46 • Provide enhanced coordination, including:
47 o Priority access to resources
48 o Additional safety evaluation
49 50 5. Communication & Accessibility
51 • Ensure portal is:
52 o Mobile-friendly
53 o Available in multiple languages
54 o Promoted through business outreach and City communications 55 56 Policy Alignment
57 Public Safety
58 Improves coordination between businesses and law enforcement resources 59 Economic Recovery
60 Reduces downtime and financial burden on businesses
61 Community Support
62 Provides clear, accessible tools for local businesses to recover and stay open 63 Fiscal Impact
64 Minimal. Primarily staff coordination and web development, with potential 65 integration into existing systems and programs.
16.J.a
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: 20260414 16 Item Business Crime Response - (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal) 1 David Yakobson
From: ALAN MONT <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2026 2:53 PM
To: councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya
Subject: Support for Centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal
EXTERNAL
April 13, 2026
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Support for Centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal Dear Mayor Torosis, Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I strongly support Councilmember Negrete’s request for a centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal and coordinated response system.
Small businesses are vital to our local economy, but crime can cause serious damage, lost revenue, and safety concerns. A streamlined portal would help businesses report incidents, access City services, and get faster support.
I also support including financial assistance for repair costs, such as broken windows and other property damage, to help businesses recover more quickly.
This is a practical step that would improve City responsiveness and better support local businesses. I urge the Council to approve this request.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Alan Mont
127 Esparta Way SM 90402
Resident/Business owner
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
16.J.b
Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: Written Comments (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal) 1 David Yakobson
From: Ashley Oelsen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 2:14 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Oliver Chi
Cc: Council Mailbox; [email protected]
Subject: Support for Centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal
EXTERNAL
April 14, 2026
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Mayor Torosis, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my strong support for Councilmember Negrete’s request that the City Council direct the City Manager to return within 15 days with an implementation plan for a centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal and coordinated response system.
Small businesses are the backbone of our local economy. When they are impacted by crime, the consequences are immediate and often devastating. Property damage, lost revenue, and safety concerns can threaten a business’s ability to stay open. At the same time, navigating available City resources can be confusing and time consuming when urgent help is needed.
A centralized and streamlined system would provide a clear and accessible pathway for businesses to quickly report incidents, access City services, and receive coordinated and timely support across departments. This approach would reduce delays in recovery and help businesses reopen faster.
It is also important that this effort includes financial assistance mechanisms to support small businesses facing unexpected costs. This should include coverage or reimbursement for damages such as broken windows and other property repairs that many small businesses cannot easily absorb.
This is a practical and solution focused proposal that strengthens economic resilience, improves City responsiveness, and demonstrates meaningful support for the business community.
I respectfully urge the Council to support this request and prioritize swift implementation.
Thank you for your leadership and attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Ashley Oelsen
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
16.J.b
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: Written Comments (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal) 1 David Yakobson
From: Kevin McKeown <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 7:58 AM
To: councilmtgitems
Subject: Item 16-J — crime portal
EXTERNAL
Might I suggest that the Council create a crime recovery portal streamlining resource access for ALL victims of crime in Santa Monica, not just businesses?
Directing limited City and other resources to only one segment of our community risks reducing availability to others, including residents.
Also, your broadening the reach of the proposed portal would avoid the appearance of self-serving direction on any one Councilmember’s part.
Thanks,
Kevin
————————————
K e v i n M c K e o w n
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mckeown.net__;!!OfuUnHCITYtmmjM!pIEu41jAxO78r_NVvdixXG6tnx2t ND-N-92sqyTeA3oMhbNH6TtNCjUG1KN0svSWgqlIIDP8CIm3ot36SEWhnr4ztgg$ Choose to be conscious
————————————
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
16.J.b
Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: Written Comments (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal) 2 David Yakobson
From: Heather Hodges <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 8:00 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; [email protected]; Council Mailbox; Oliver Chi
Subject: Support for Centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal
EXTERNAL
April 14, 2026
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Mayor Torosis, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my strong support for Councilmember Negrete’s request that the City Council direct the City Manager to return within 15 days with an implementation plan for a centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal and coordinated response system.
Small businesses are the backbone of our local economy. When they are impacted by crime, the consequences are immediate and often devastating. Property damage, lost revenue, and safety concerns can threaten a business’s ability to stay open. At the same time, navigating available City resources can be confusing and time consuming when urgent help is needed.
A centralized and streamlined system would provide a clear and accessible pathway for businesses to quickly report incidents, access City services, and receive coordinated and timely support across departments. This approach would reduce delays in recovery and help businesses reopen faster.
It is also important that this effort includes financial assistance mechanisms to support small businesses facing unexpected costs. This should include coverage or reimbursement for damages such as broken windows and other property repairs that many small businesses cannot easily absorb.
This is a practical and solution focused proposal that strengthens economic resilience, improves City responsiveness, and demonstrates meaningful support for the business community.
I respectfully urge the Council to support this request and prioritize swift implementation.
Thank you for your leadership and attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Heather Hodges
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
16.J.b
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: Written Comments (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal) 3 David Yakobson
From: Greg Morena <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 8:00 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; Oliver Chi Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal
EXTERNAL
April 14, 2026
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Mayor Torosis, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my strong support for Councilmember Negrete’s request that the City Council direct the City Manager to return within 15 days with an implementation plan for a centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal and coordinated response system.
Small businesses are the backbone of our local economy. When they are impacted by crime, the consequences are immediate and often devastating. Property damage, lost revenue, and safety concerns can threaten a business’s ability to stay open. At the same time, navigating available City resources can be confusing and time consuming when urgent help is needed.
A centralized and streamlined system would provide a clear and accessible pathway for businesses to quickly report incidents, access City services, and receive coordinated and timely support across departments. This approach would reduce delays in recovery and help businesses reopen faster.
It is also important that this effort includes financial assistance mechanisms to support small businesses facing unexpected costs. This should include coverage or reimbursement for damages such as broken windows and other property repairs that many small businesses cannot easily absorb.
This is a practical and solution focused proposal that strengthens economic resilience, improves City responsiveness, and demonstrates meaningful support for the business community.
I respectfully urge the Council to support this request and prioritize swift implementation.
Thank you for your leadership and attention to this important matter.
Greg Morena
North of Montana
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
16.J.b
Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: Written Comments (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal) 4 David Yakobson
From: Amber James <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 9:25 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; Oliver Chi Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal
EXTERNAL
April 13, 2026
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Mayor Torosis, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my strong support for Councilmember Negrete’s request that the City Council direct the City Manager to return within 15 days with an implementation plan for a centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal and coordinated response system.
Small businesses are the backbone of our local economy. When they are impacted by crime, the consequences are immediate and often devastating. Property damage, lost revenue, and safety concerns can threaten a business’s ability to stay open. At the same time, navigating available City resources can be confusing and time consuming when urgent help is needed.
A centralized and streamlined system would provide a clear and accessible pathway for businesses to quickly report incidents, access City services, and receive coordinated and timely support across departments. This approach would reduce delays in recovery and help businesses reopen faster.
It is also important that this effort includes financial assistance mechanisms to support small businesses facing unexpected costs. This should include coverage or reimbursement for damages such as broken windows and other property repairs that many small businesses cannot easily absorb.
This is a practical and solution focused proposal that strengthens economic resilience, improves City responsiveness, and demonstrates meaningful support for the business community.
I respectfully urge the Council to support this request and prioritize swift implementation.
Thank you for your leadership and attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Amber James
Pico Neighborhood
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
16.J.b
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: Written Comments (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal) 1 David Yakobson
From: Carly Ann <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 10:01 AM
To: councilmtgitems; Lana Negrete; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; Dan Hall; Ellis Raskin; Barry Snell; Natalya Zernitskaya; Council Mailbox; Oliver Chi Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Support for Centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal
EXTERNAL
April 13, 2026
The Honorable Members of the Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Mayor Torosis, Honorable Members of the City Council, and City Manager Chi, I am writing to express my strong support for Councilmember Negrete’s request that the City Council direct the City Manager to return within 15 days with an implementation plan for a centralized Business Crime Response and Recovery Portal and coordinated response system.
Small businesses are the backbone of our local economy. When they are impacted by crime, the consequences are immediate and often devastating. Property damage, lost revenue, and safety concerns can threaten a business’s ability to stay open. At the same time, navigating available City resources can be confusing and time consuming when urgent help is needed.
A centralized and streamlined system would provide a clear and accessible pathway for businesses to quickly report incidents, access City services, and receive coordinated and timely support across departments. This approach would reduce delays in recovery and help businesses reopen faster.
It is also important that this effort includes financial assistance mechanisms to support small businesses facing unexpected costs. This should include coverage or reimbursement for damages such as broken windows and other property repairs that many small businesses cannot easily absorb.
This is a practical and solution focused proposal that strengthens economic resilience, improves City responsiveness, and demonstrates meaningful support for the business community.
I respectfully urge the Council to support this request and prioritize swift implementation.
Thank you for your leadership and attention to this important matter.
Carly Ann
Ocean Park Neighborhood
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
Item 16-J
April 14, 2026
16.J.b
Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: Written Comments (7676 : Business Crime Response & Recovery Portal)