Santa Paula City Council
August 21, 2024

O Partner — 0 Limited 0 General
O Individual 0 Attorney in Fact
O Trustee CI Guardian or Conservator
0 Signer
Other:
is

Representing:
*......... .. .
©2018 National Notary Association
375
DOC #2022000065339 Page 12 of 27

EXHIBIT A
376
DOC #2022000065339 Page 13 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)

SUMMARY SHEET'
Instructions: User Input Required
ITEM
Street/General Improvements
Removal and Adjustments
Drainage Improvements
Potable Water Improvements
Reclaimed Water Improvements
Sewer Improvements
Monuments
Misc. Water & Sewer Improv.

Grading
Cost Estimate Prepared By:

Signature - Developer's !neer
Cost Estimate Approved :
(Total from Sheet 3)
(Total from Sheet 4)
(Total from Sheet 6)
(Total from Sheet 8)
(Total from Sheet 13)
(Total from Sheet 10)
(Total from Sheet 11)
(Total from Sheet 14)
Total City of Santa Paula
Improvements
(Total from Sheet 9)
Total City of Santa Paula
Grading
2-23-2022
Date
Signature - Cit entative V,1/403z
Date
Sheet 1 of 15
AMOUNT
77,874.65
26,749.80

0.00 424,484.36

0.00 466,606.76

0.00 0.00
995,715.57

0.00 0.00
Engineer's Seal
(include R.C.E It and expiration date)
377
DOC #2022000065339 Page 14 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
-
Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) Jnit Cost ($, item Cost
: Street/General Improvements . • _ . - . . _
1 Finish Grade & Prime Coat ,.. ,..._,.. '--0 SF NA 0.25 0.00 2 Finish Aggreg. Sub Base ($.15/in) .;'._;-',:1,'-':-•10 SF „I :-' 0-, .„ 0.00 0.00 3 Finish Aggreg. Rock Base ($.20/in) ..'' ' =._. 17,. 7 SF " -12::-.4- ,

2.40 424.80
4 Finish Asphalt Concrete ($.48/in) s'_::-..::,k 4-77 SF -' L:"4-1' C 1.92 , 339.84 5 Fog Seal Coat .
-, 3, s•.-..._0 SF NA 0.25 0.00
6 Cross Gutter & Apron 7" Thick :',..:.2, low SF NA 16.00 16,160.00 7 ,
Concrete Sidewalk 4" Thick s ,::,,14).6 SF NA 14.00 19,740.00 8 Conc. Driveway Reside. (6" Thick [*Min]
= $15/SF, + $.28/SF for ea. add. inch of thick)
,';'''-.. ..„.,-
t.'''.:' ., SF ,..c,
. , 6,‘..:,' 15.00 0.00
Conc. Driveway Commercial (6" Thick [*Min]
= $15/SF, + $.28/SF for ea. add. inch of thick)
' ,'.‘.'-', '-‘,:; ,i:- 9 „ : .F,-,- :,
SF .,-,,'".
- - 8 `.,..:
1 15.56 0.00
10 Stamped Concrete (add 1")
.
,', ,_ .1., -
- 0 SF NA 0.00
11 Concrete Curb & Gutter, Type A-2
...
. '-
t,-...: ::' 171- LF NA 37.50 6,412.50
12 Air Blown Mortar 3" Thick ,,,:- '..:`:, *,- ,,0 SF NA 7.00 0.00 13 Concrete Curb Only .4 '.•
• ._0 LF NA 31.00 0.00
14 Concrete Curb & Gutter, Roiled - , t.._' , - ' '6 LF NA ., 44.50 0.00 15 Asphalt Concrete Berm - -,. . - IF NA 9.00 0.00
16 Concrete Cutoff Berm •3 , -
. ,_ .. .. LF NA 15.00 0.00
17 , Barricades .; --:._0 IF NA 63.50 0.00
18 Street Name Signs 1 EA NA 360.00 , 360.00
19 Traffic Signs 0-; t', '-''''41 EA NA 310.00 310.00
20 Block Garden Wall 6' ..., - --, 0 LF NA 97.00 0.00
21 Chain-Link Fence •::. i..,C-„0 IF NA 25.00 0.00
22 Redwood Header 1-,-. ';.:.-,-: ..0 LF . NA 6.00 0.00 23 Reflective Pavement Markers Types D & G -0, EA
,
NA 10.00 0.00
24 ,I..Y\-,•,',.;
Pavement Markers Types A & AY .
•0 EA NA 7.00 0.00
25 Street Lighting (Standard in place)
Residential (includes Trenching)
' -,-;• ' - , •., ;'''...-'0 ' ."-h,_',
EA
,
NA 2,800.00 0.00 „ ,
26 ,
Street Lighting (Standard in place)
Commercial & Industr. (Includes Trenching)
.::::''' '0
:. ,,xcEA NA
,
3,300.00 0.00
27 Traffic Striping - Double Solid ,....., '''';',. -•: -0- , IF NA 3.50 0.00 _
28 Traffic Striping - Single Solid r',.: .; .4: 0 LF NA , 2.00 0.00 , 29 Traffic Striping - Single Skip -- -.' 0 IF NA 2.00 0.00 - 30 Traffic Striping- Letters/Arrows ' ,,c‘,..,1_'...-,0 EA NA 19.50 0.00 31 Parking Lot Striping: Parking Space ., 0 EA NA 6.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL ($) 43,747.14
continued on Sheet 3
Sheet 2 of 15
378
DOC #2022000065339 Page 15 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) _
Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) .. Unit Cost ($) item Cost Stivet/Geniral Improvements Cont. • , ' •, . . s. , ...4 -, • 32 Parking Lot Striping: Handicap Space ,.:1,,.:•,fi,--1,;'9 EA NA 52.00 0.00 33 Handicap Ramps e:t''''i-2.- . . ot..,•.!.. ''''.':'i'2 EA NA 3,800.00 7,600.00 34 Sawcutting ;-1,i,...-316 LF NA 3.00 948.00
35 Undergrounding of Exist. Overhead Utilities --;-.-,,... - • '',..;:-,..,1,-,e,0 IF NA 460.00 0.00 36 Slope Protection - Permanent -S, „:,...1:j.,,c--,•_1() SF NA 1.50 0.00 37 Erosion Control Temporary ;,-,-,-.. ., ,o IS NA `,:K.;;',..-:-•,;-:‘,',:', 0.00 . 38 ,
Temp. Storm Water Pollution Cont.Measures ..:!;;;',...! -1. IS NA ::,16-,06090.-.' 10,000.00 39 Non-Struct. Best Management Practices •,--..:7.0 IS NA ;;.':-..`-',..3;'.: 0.00 40 Construction Traffic Control ',.'„1-'„ /,,.1 IS NA l',.8,590.00'; 8,500.00 41 Aggregate Slurry Seal ';:',1,:e--".:‘: :0 SY NA 3.00 0.00 42 Street Numbers Painted on Curbs -i;•:•;"•";.., ii) EA NA 22.50 0.00 I....,
•
,.;,-, •. -:::.. -.;2,,,, .,:t. 4 ,•,. „_ , • , t ,,i.„:,....k...:,: : , . ) '„•,, ' Z. _ , 'I .s., .... (. 1 : I eli .: 1. fit••;•:$ , r s,,-,,,, - 1.... •'• 4. .1 • ' ,- *
,, 4.•N. ,,i,
ri 1/47 Z •
, : s ,,, ,.. .
. " .1 • • “
, •,•,..,‘,....t.,..,• ri...,•,:
''' .• , ,I •:‘;'•.' _tk 0.00
:;-' 1-•.,-.,' t., _,'•-‘: i'...•..-,:4 .-.7,...,•:-1.-•,..„ '-...,-.a.. .1.-•• -•• - - . ._„.... , , c .-. -:,... _•••,...,-„.• ...[...L.... :,...- , 000 z.. r •-• •- ..:-•••,..; •.,,,,„,- ;,.,,:t.:.. , .. .:„ • •-•;„ ,•: Yr _.., •, ..1‘,4 ,:J • ;. • ;••A; !•)81; • 'r..' . ': jo V't.‘,Z, f•; •)!I r•e ..„, ti'11... S'!•',.,
,, .. , ...1.7 : .$p. ..•
,_.. • . . • ,
''. C t • •••S• ....:,Z
.,,,,,,, , .1 . •
••,„: ih: ' . ..f' ,7 0.00
''4,.." -•:-:::':..r. ‘-t:-.--4: '21.,''3-;-:;..'','"•11:!.....z;-;-.:•.:;‘:':-.."Fi*Z`4?' '`&.'.:' '";--.•`;‘..4.fc.':1` '-',"-i.fi ''":,2-, ..i ; . -,'''',..r[..?-.I.:".•;17.,?- 000 •,'-'.:-r.NT:, -....... ' bktV:i.".-`,1,::-..e. ,;',!...:,.. ; ; .,-;-:.-'.1,;-•''').5.‘1 ...;il.,4:: - .trs:C.'''.; N'Ys.:. -, - - .4.-':'",: .••,' " ,:-.4t • .i '.:'. ' . 0, - = . • r.r.e •7!.,.-1-. if ., 0.00 . ••., -.-- •:.•• .- : -, ...., .1,-0 •.i-...e--,---- .•••• ., -4.•:,t••••, •,,-., •- .. -.....f -;••';'. -:. -':•9"..', •4-4 -r, • --. ,.. :'%-i..11, ;,-...: .1-' 1',-1, i.'-'..- s:,- , ...4 - • ''t ' . - -, - .1....t., , .- -.-,•-•-, ' ....t-••••• q - ...-•-•,..,:; - -;--,.. 1 3.• . • • I:, ' r:g

0.00 3.,.:;....;;; •':-.„!'•,,',. ft•,,-.‘44.:,..*-:•'' ,:,:?.`,•:2• `-.•5,.'-is';e,i_51, :".:',?.--,::,-;7;,..k; , ;;-;-;--:. • 0.00 •-...- "..Q. i %-.i. ,....., bpl.,...5. :r....).., ...•..-, •,-,. ,,. •.,•._-‘•• „7,-,„-,•1,7;,- , .c..?., .;',•'-.. ...•&-...:': k--:... --i.:..h.):6••.......•-•'-,..‘;..1.ct;‘',,,...-0:;.• ..-- ,-,-; -,-,,, •,:,1,.: •,„ tr...t. ..'"1.,..,,..- ,.:„ r>.-`. .,- ...".,- 4... 4 0.00 ),
.,..-._• -.•-,,,,r,r ..,,,..q.-.. - - ,,-&-:.-$. .... „. %,..-,:. ; , • %.__.... ‘-_•••,,k„ •;ii-A2.-,;..., ",--,....• ....1:2,-..- v. ••4..;:::, ..1-, -: •i: :'.....••.....,:, i.-, . - : ......... ',..-c•I• \. ,.,-;:,?-• • -.. P._-• -...4 r.i.., ,•„- •,.:-,- ..:: _4; ,kt:'. ,-.1 ?, 0.00 1-..;:. .; -..--,_;:.;,•.•,; kt„,. \'..,•:.% :' •:,,,,.....; ;'• i'. . I. . •,,,t,':,,t„•.% •., A ;,:s.,:-.„-:i '...1) L....4-4.' .. •'.i 1".:::•-r•-.." ,s-...: .. -•, .:.' ..t:',•,,. '- r,-,0;--,,,,,,....,--.,•.,,:, . ;,.••.‘,.•., .,2,*; t, 44 I. •.. t,...v -,...,, • , ,....., ; • .,_} ,..:-,..,.---....,:.;, t „ ..,` ••• ...,-. 000_ -'s
.. : '''' ':3' ' r`, • q ;4--, ';--!v-..f.....):.1.:'-'2:- ' - ki`z.,.., ........;• , •t; -,•••:".-•• •'.•;y....., ':',"•.'f.-...1-. ..,1.--...', • •',,*1•• • .s;•• , .V.•':".!.1,-,•.- .. • • , ,f.:... r':' ,1,..., s•z-., -.:,....‘ sq'.:.., -- .s....,:-: . •e,-.....--. . 0.00 '3''''•;?..••••!'.;;;'*•I -:-.::-J''''s.,..•,•':: •;4.'-....1:ts•`.5-':.::.1:''''` ,..:`1'-:;":*:1;•#.1.' ...).'il.•'1-]; .•f;-:',"..i..''. 4-i.,1..: ,'-1 0.00 ,4 .7;-'_".-*:, ..-....''. '.k4:'•1::•;.,".::•• i•:.!•?*":-..--.',N.--..... 1s '.Z7::e ki.: .4' ' C,:: "...i, ‘a " .`: .. •;i' i:'. : 1 c'..- :::-: ::'. • 0.00 -.‘"."'''''..;:.:‘'`?":'1,..7:.'.''';,--•‘'..,;....'.‘'......s,?.:,--;',-,7:‘1 ::i.::::::::%•-•'. :c.:.:.'.1.--- 1.-:,..;:, '-''..' !...1-,!; ,,.-1`.,*_, :". i 0.00 • - -v.; ).. , .4.pe,.. --;••,..;.,.; -:;4.4„.:•,,...'-_,,,t •' :(.41,‘, ....r--; - ;,..,s,I . 4,4... -4.-„,..--..!..-- 000.00 4,1i.:::,..'../,' '?..t..---. 2,-,-:.:.--,i,Y,47.;.:°•:':;,-.,' '1 -:-.1,-...1',(14:-i::: •.::::. 'i: Y:--Z5-= ..':'%'‘:'-,:),i',0.00 ,,.-'_:,- .:.-,„; ......i:••,••••,:,,_'--';'',•,:,:i,' ',1,',1..-,:,.,:cts.,-,;.=,:i:-..,•:4, -ti;i•As,:f.;.' 1;,:•2,-:•>,1•.;54..:.,: ..'5:-..c?,:.',.::., ,....:s_....*;; '•:".PI:s:,)i ,...-;• 0.00 :-..,-...-. f,;;-:,.,..-,•,.. '•-:,. -; -...,%:•-,..,,w.-,::•-- 't •,',K.•,,," ic.'1' •11--•,---: '.!= -,.'-41/4' -,.`•d, ' -k• '. ""•:•:•m:f-k '4-, 7 ot•-4 , r_1 •fIL-,4 ,..- c•„:••14--7' -. ::' ‘,i',.,', ., --- • - • , «f3`. -.... 'I" •-.7 -- ---,-N 47 •;. i--.....-..,.,, 0.00 I &:.1---.--;;,-.--'..'.;:?,..,:i.';':!..'sc,.. •-•;--11..1,.;:.'•: &'.4'........-,..'...,•-; 0.00 - ' ...... .--• --•:9 7':.- , e; ;- •.---, '-'..•.,..";%•-• -'•--'-, ••,, i, •.-. r,' ---,. --7---:-7•-, - 44,- '..,".....":..-".,. '''' .."'.1`";•;::. .'' :I ,..", '-•,-•,;;::.,-,-- ' ....i t•:" ". I-s,'.- ..4z,_-,.„.: .,..-„r f ItCrg ,... -;.• ''. ;,,,, -....•..:-••-:...-.. . 0.00 ' •'
, -' ,sr,.:4:') .A ..." ,s.,..= •'-.1.:-.;r r '''''.
.• : t -.', •'4-7-. '.•:-.:-.-:.,"0..v.,...0,4,- .:.--- ,.....r,......‘ ., .,,.: ' ; ' . ' 7:-.: ... •,......:•-,..- , 1•4 •'-' ''' -•,,%., ,` . , ,1 • ZI,: - ; r`.:- „- /-)4', `,'.> ',::'-',--,P.' _.,• .4. . ... .... 0.00 SUBTOTAL ($) (SHEET 3) 27,048.00
- ' -
TOTAL (SHEETS 2 & 3)
- -- -
70,795.14
ADD 10% 7,079.51
-
TOTAL 77,874.65
Sheet 3 of 15
379
DOC #2022000065339 Page 16 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit '
_
Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
.Removal and Adjustments " -. . .
'
•.'''',' '-',\:- _ , ..
1 Concrete rz.sy:,---4,71-,-,0Cy NA 112.00 0.00
2 Asphalt cj;:_•,.,; .„ftN SF NA 5.00 400.00
3 Concrete Sidewalk, Driveway,
Cross Gutter, Spandrel
*;-,,Z,-.._-"t"-.._ • ,,-g„.-:?•,1460
'4•,:..4.- ::

SF
'
NA 12.00
.
17,520.00
4 Curb Only '''.•''-'0 '' LF NA 9.00 0.00
- 5 Curb and Gutter ... .._„- I '>'.'•':•146 LF NA 13.00 1,898.00 6 Storm Drain Pipe 15" - 42" i*-', . ..'-r.: ... .„ 0 1F _, , NA 9.00
'

0.00 7 Storm Drain Pipe 42" ' ''''.•_•:1'..„-0 LF NA 18.00 _0.00 8 Storm Drain Plug 6 EA NA ;.,`..,-:2`,.6:, ‘i:;,:;' 0.00 9 Adjust Survey Monument to Grade ,-i, ',-.,',1..-; 0 EA NA 500.00 0.00 10 Adjust Manhole to Grade ,
"3%.,Z‘z::-....,Ci ' EA NA 540.00 0.00
11 ' Adjust Water Valve Box to Grade _ f`'..:•:::-.--..• _ *:9 EA NA 365.00 0.00 - 12 Irrigation Box ,,;::„.,;..;......„,,..=z„..9 EA NA ::.'..:•z•0.00:,' , ' 0.00 13 ' Waterlines ;'¡'" ') 1.''.0 LF NA -:- - --, •-,3. :i 0.002 (-... 0.00 14 Trees -
--.:...1 •..c..•, -: EA NA 2,566:O0.'i, 2,500.00
15 Traffic Striping Removal (single stripe) LF NA 3.00 0.00 .. 16 Traffic Striping Removal (double stripe) r::,...s0 ' -- ,
LF NA 3.50 0.00
17 Remove LS Area and Irrigation .
i'l' ',:-.; :1,:1 Ls NA :'. I0-0k).-öä'',1". 2,000.00
18 Remove Trees ,2;','.,, -1 EA NA i-..',i,.:4..-: i*: 17 0.00 19 Relocate Signs •,.e.• ;.r.- . ,---:,,.: , •, z'r,•-.0 EA NA .` -..,`,..:-.-;;" ":-• 0.00 20 Adjust Utility Box to Grade EA _ NA '>',.-•>-- ?•-•.; 4-7-2'Z 0.00 21 Abandon Pipe, in Place ‘I'' ••,•,.). -,•''''..--i0 ••.-,,,,..e. LE NA ' 0 ••••'1:•-.,-. 0.00 22 Remove Pipe Y7.Ö LF NA ;;.;'4_, •--j.•:';A:`.. .';, 0.00 23 Abandon Manhole, In Place .-•.••- r..-; ...,-,, ' ‘ 0 EA NA ;,..-:-;!:;`,-;.:',.-7,:t,'•. 0,00 .- , ••'''. '' •-..-t ' .s'.-..-• •.'.• •,-. ; .-.,-ia.....;,,, S. .-h-s» ,-. -..jr':,. ' -:..- -te:.• f;;;-•,- -: `2,7'1: 0.00 , ,, ...."..,,,„3...,,....„, - _ •-,, 2 „ , _.i•J•!.....3, j2,7,- ., - • -_,- • 0.00

0.00 - , t , , ,...,.-
i-•..;.. ..,,.. , - ...-, ....,, •, -, ,,.• , si._. .,.( . -•.. „ tis7'. ,-,.: ....,,, ,_ , ..-,..,- -,» e - :,..... -. v.• • , , . ' ...,e . -",.. , ..• r . - _ . •• ,,e, h , - .... , .,., , e...._.•-. ,:, _ • , - • ,- , • -'-, r 0.00 '• - '..'-'•_-•.. . - ' ;'. •,. ' ,. 'S. 1 --- r• - ; - , • . . e _,'-_,, '- .- • fr ..;,...‘+.g, ....,--- ' .2; .,....e,-, , _, ...4, .-.• ,'",-, .• . . ,. •.: !.;..i .4,.,,: rt• ,..k,--.",-,,, f',1.-±.,. ;••.›,

1. •,_ --', ......, z. •:„-:•.. , :-....-- -, 0.00 , .:,, . ,:. •},:.,„.-.•_•..,..•,.z;,-.2 ._„.,,,,_:‘:-•,•:,z-- :::..,..:f.,',._:--,-, '-,,.;"*_'';'-',;',1•2*-••-',,*,- "--,J.:A,' 2',1:--'-'_;" •••, r.,,-.z.,...- ,_::;.;:"::»' 0.00 '
. -
7,•'. • s,'‘..:1).- ..--.--;.›., :. 4 ',2.P, ; ., ,s,... !,-;•-•.. ,' ,',. ' _. '‘, . ' -. ' . : ,.: - . e.7:-...• '... g .*.,''.:; ,-j-2,•' . s. ,,,,.. 'Y''. .. .;:: - .: v: '. " • ,.. v.., .'i, ', ,, :.:•..--.1,,:_-..: *. ›, z -_:r .-,'„,,,'. ' ,- . ...,. ..7..`;'-t--. ,,,,, • ' .-`_.. , ._,, 0.00 ;..2 ,..',s,j ''' Z .,:-:',!:.' - 'F. !'.'''2":., z :: : . .:-,:.''jt' - :,)-::':.--.`;':3:_'1,,. ''.:_ >.' T:-..'"-'5:-.',4,,, 0.00 , ,- •-',.....1.).-- ---,,..... ' •,•,--,..e,....-:, ..-- •, • .;.• •-•-. . :....,z-: '-•-•:, 7,....,..• •.•..,, "i. . ;:i. ..• -• ,,,,•-, - , -1..:(- .,.. --•.»...--,-, ! . tz,,,; .,,,:.•_•,_,- =..‘ (., --,i'..• • - , •••- _•- .,' ' .." - . -. ,...', 0.00 ,.k..----'•,••; , ,.•1-... .'-:-.-:': L.,!.".,»)..._'-3: '--t-,:..-:-;,, ' . ,. ,.;--.-',, 24,318.00

0.00 SUBTOTAL
ADD 10% 2,431.80
. -
TOTAL ..
- - .
26,749.80
Sheet 4 of 15
380
DOC #2022000065339 Page 17 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Extra (Ft) Unit Cost ($) t Item Cost ,..-.....- ' Drarnäge Improvements , .. .. . .

Storm Drain Pipe (In place, including
earthwork) Round Pipe Cost CMP (CMPA)
1 18" (22" x 13" $6.25/LF extra) •t •,11'CIZ. 03.0 LF NA 70.00 0.00 2 21" (24" x 16" $6.25/LF extra) :1'5: '_''g..)•:.....0 LF NA 85.00 0.00 3 24" (29" x 181' $10.40/LF extra) : -.. s', 'O IF NA 105.00 0.00 4 30" (36" x 22" $14.75/LF extra) .f,s 7.'-'••,,, ::9 LF NA 125.00 0.00 5 36" (43" x 27" $16.90/LF extra) .' .--...i. i;',..:.7"::-.':', -0 LF NA 145.00 0.00 6 42" (50" x 30" $20.70/LF extra) :
,•'-='•-•;• • _,, , -
•-
"0 LF NA 170,00 0.00
7 48" (58" x 36" $27.50/LF extra) '..:, ',e r ,0 LF NA 190.00 0.00 8 60" (72" x 44" $31.00/LF extra) :, ;,,,,•:,-,.r,:_ 0 is NA 245,00 0.00 9 72" (83" x 57" $35.00/LF extra) ,, '„:.._3::::«,:,..,''.0 LF NA 330.00 0.00 Reinforced Concrete Pipe
(RCP)
10 18" (22" x 13" $6.25/LF extra) 112::';'•.','.',;':0 . t_. IF NA 87.00 0.00 11 21" (24" x 16" $6.25/LF extra)
.
-;,21'i.,'•'..,-,A LF NA 102.00 0.00
12 24" (29" x 18" $10.40/LF extra) ;:.'.;:. :;:).-; •'. LF NA 118.00 0.00 13 30" (36" x 22" $14.75/LF extra) ;,-'•j'''C,: ';,:_tfi IF NA 140.00 0.00 14 36" (43" x 27" $16.90/LF extra) . :: ,=t1,•'''''D ...„. . LF NA 155.00 ' 0.00 15 42" (50" x 30" $20.70/LF extra) ',_IO IF NA 190.00 0.00 16 48" (58" x 36" $27.50/LF extra) ,.. .-• , 7.,•• >21 ,st- 0 LF NA 210.00 0.00 17 60" (72" x 44" $31.00/LF extra) ;I•'>"J,..1,"0 LE NA 260.00 0.00 18 72" (83" x 57" $35.00/LF extra) ..: g':1:,6 LF NA 330.00 0 CIPP ,
19 24" ./ -.• t , •. •;_b• ,,-VO LF NA 65.00 0.00
20, 27" .627/--,:- 1-,0 LE NA 68.00 0.00
21 30" (.•I:•:, ?I-,0 LF NA 74.00 0.00
22 36" 1:+'„,»-,Y,,•' 0 IF NA 88.00 0.00
23 42" - ..- -• 0 IF NA 100.00 0.00
24 48" '.-.:7:1'._'::•2,-..;;',15 IF NA 119.00 0.00
25 54" '4, :':;•:ii..1'0 LF NA 142.00 0.00
26 60" ':':g`,V..Í.:•::': 0 IF NA 176.00 0.00
27 66" t,%.-,•;->-,,,';,,,10 IF NA 189.00 0.00
28' 72" 9`- .,...z. f: ,
' ' 0 LF NA 219.00 0.00
29 84" ;-,,,,.Mi LF NA 270.00 0.00
30 96" ii'.'' ':::-;-,'•;•a I-F NA 340.00 0.00
31 Standard 48" Dla Manhole (precast) ',¡-_-•:',;'0 EA NA 3,100.00 0.00 32 Standard 48" Dia Manhole (CIPP) '';..", ',0 EA NA 4,300.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL ($) 0.00
continued on Sheet 6
Sheet 5 of 15
381
DOC #2022000065339 Page 18 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
Drainage Improvements Cont. . ' . . ,• . - . , .
33 Junction Structures (CIPP) ' . ,';''-l-' ,"..'ci ce NA 2,850.00 0.00 34, Standard Inlet Type OL, L = 10' {.: .2,.': - 0 EA NA 2,950.00 35 Standard Inlet Type GOL, L.=7' "',..\'.,..:1:0 EA NA 3,950.00 0.00 36 Standard Inlet Type GOL, L=10' P.': j.' 0 EA NA 4,700.00 0.00 37 Standard Inlet Type 05,1=3.5' ,.-s.",`.r.,..,:0 EA NA 2,800.00 0.00 38 Standard Inlet Type Gl, G2, G3, G4,
G5, 66 L=3" or less
.. ! '`:--•
- NA 2,800.00 0.00
39 Standard Inlet Type 612, GT4, L=6.5' •'•-•- .`" :0 EA NA 3,950.00 0.00 40 Standard Inlet Type Gil, GT3, L=6.5' l' i t.',- 0 EA NA 3,750.00 0.00 41 Standard Inlet Type GO, L=3.51 . _ ..,,. . :,'...•',! •2-L',-0 EA NA 2,900.00 0.00 42 Standard Inlet Type GDO, L=3.5' .,::.;•'_1;;;;.1,:.: 0 EA NA 3,400.00 0.00 43 Standard Inlet Type SPPWC 300-2, L=3.5' :•-••,..;;C;i7r,...`i.0 EA NA 2,900.00 0.00 44 Standard inlet Type SPPWC 300-2, L=7.0' •7:,1.';4,.•.,()EA NA 4,370.00 0.00 45 Standard Inlet Type SPPWC 300-2, L=14.0' r;i'''..:-q--ji EA NA 7,000.00 0.00 46 Standard Inlet Type SPPWC 301-2,1=7.0' :,'r,?..". f''... '0 EA NA 4,060.00 0.00 47 For ea Foot of inlet length add or subtract, :. t••:': :0 LF NA 405.00 0.00 48 Terrace, Interceptor or Down Drains :,',",,,,,•,;.s.,:;J 0 LF NA 36.00 0.00 49 Class A Reinf Concrete (more than 100 CV) ' ,i';','-"c'1'f-0 NA 870.00 50 Class A Reinf Concrete (less than 100 CV) ..,•,_k,•-::::.-.:1,9 CY NA 960.00 0.00 51 Rip Rap (placed-ungrouted) ":':',..,•J":- .0 NA 170.00 0.00 52 Rip Rap (placed-grouted) ••'"-;-;,---;(j CY NA 205.00 0.00 53 Rip Rap (sacked) ',..'•-s,',,','::._:,•.:'. CY NA 210.00 0.00 54 Structural Best Management Practices ;.7YP.:.:;_lic:',.-.0 LS NA 1,:-••-:.;:.T..::••• .....<.: 0.00 55 Standard 3" Curb Drain 7,"• '`,:s'--0 EA NA :' .,, .':Al ' ‘..,.. 0.00 ...,.! c.. •s,:- ••'‘,„ ;.:. I •!.1 • ,-.. '''.•••:.Lt::::'*:"..: ,•s. '.1';'::•:; !..::---:-.ZI''. :•;.1.! ,--...•:-......1.,..:-.'' 0.00 -:- • ,' , ' :, „'' !;"';i'":7 •
1 ;_. ; -;r1/:.:.... *--- ;'",":.c.;.1, ,.'-' . ; ..-:'„- , ,'" ,,-.,i.• ': ',‘ ...:: : 0.00 ':"_,. ' 0 ' • ' :-•;.•,':',91,..;... - . ' -:... • ' :‘`. '''...'i-:,:-::.;...-? • .....-:' '2_,-.- .. :':;,':,..:,':- -A''' .. 0.00 ? '..i,. ' r. ,.:,:';f:!'''_ •.;!.'j' , ','. ;:s.I.1,..: 7 r",-, -,..-:' ;, f Lc' i•-'', . • i 0.00 t " ' s., :Cr ), v ; . -' ',./V.,- -', ' % ''....,.,4;-...., ' .. ,. , , 0.00 '.%,'; ' .: ,'-','N''•I's-:::‘,.''..-f-,; '' . :' '''' ". '•'.!' . ' ':,";:i`.-i•,:•1-.:. "•.;L: --!..•:: --•- 0.00 ••.1, ••L . IS
•.„- '-' . ' ., 1-.::‘::, -.2...i..c.' -.•-: '2,1.;,•.,_ :„.';;,:1,,rf=-!:!: j," ..:1 • 1, , s .;_-.-r...., - ." 0.00

0.00 r $• :=; - -'' "••••-; • 4';.- ' .7., -,. ' -' ; IF ":.:-, . : - ,t• • '. -- : ;'''4".-, ..- '' -"-:' :-"‘" •';',L;, ;..„3.7.. 1',•,•: ' ":. .., 7_7:.. r-1'' , :-Is.' : , _.'S. .' !:\l' '':-',.•''''. '•M SUBTOTAL (SHEET 6) 0.00
TOTAL (SHEET 5, 6) 0.00
ADD 10% 0.00
TOTAL 0.00
Sheet 6 of 15
382
DOC #2022000065339 Page 19 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Thick. {in) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
Potable Water Improvements . . , , , _ •
1 6" PVC C-900, CL 150 ,...
.
•94:03 .. - IF NA 29.00 2,726.87
2 8" PVC C-900, CL 150 , 3029 LF NA 35.00 106,015.00
3 10" PVC C-900, CL 150 , .,. • • ' 0 LF NA 46.00 0.00
4 12" PVC C-900, CL 150 ' s ''.% 0 LF NA 68.00 0.00
5 6" PVC C-900, CL 200 , ,::. -.- :0 LF NA 33.00 0.00
6 8" PVC C-900, CL 200 '-'•,' rfp IF NA 41.00 0.00
7 10" PVC C-900, CL 200 _ - • , . --•, : 0 LF NA 52.00 0.00 8 12" PVC C-900, CL 200 ' l' f '. .0 LF NA 72.00 0.00
9 14" DIP ,: ,-;::-0 IF NA 73.00 0.00
10 16" DIP -.7--..0 LF NA 82.00 0.00
11 20" DIP 1 'L..' t'.'''..0 IF NA 131.00 0.00
12 6" Tee, In Place '• %.-'-:•,-_,0 EA NA 452.00 0.00
13 8" x 6" Tee, In Place ' '''''-''' 0 EA NA 655.00 0.00 14 8" Tee, In Place , •,_ _ _ ••. , _ 9 EA NA 685.00 6,165.00 15 10" x 6" Tee or 10" x 8" Tee, In Place 4::',' ,0 EA NA 950.00 0.00 16 10" Tee, In Place ;: --:-......I? EA NA 1,015.00 0.00 17 12" Tee, In Place , ..„ ..‘•0 EA NA 1,210.00 0.00
18 16" Tee, In Place i . :_.;-:, p EA NA 3,140.00 0.00
19 16" x 6" Tee or 20" x 8" Tee, In Place '-• '-'1:-0 EA NA 3,140.00 0.00 20 20" Tee, In Place •-. '-' ,, 0 EA NA 3,740.00 0.00
21 20" x 6" Tee or 20" x 8" Tee, In Place ; : ,-;•': ,1 EA NA 4,100.00 4,100.00 22 8" Cross, In Place .,.. .,.._0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
23 10" Cross, In Place ;;•,' :: 1Z;'cl EA NA 1,300.00 0.00 24 12" Cross, In Place , ... ',: 0 EA NA 1,500.00 0.00
25 16" Cross, In Place ' ' ' 0 EA NA 4,100.00 0.00
26 20" Cross, In Place il '" . EA NA 5,500.00 0.00
27 8" x 6" Reducer, In Place ., ... '''1 EA NA 453.00 453.00 28 10" x 8" Reduced, In Place .''.„ :,(::::,,,p EA NA 640.00 0.00 29 12" x 8" or 12" x 10" Reducer, In Place -' ...;,!.. 1 EA NA 890.00 890.00 30 16" x 8" or 16" x 10" Reducer, In Place • .,EA NA 2,370.00 0.00 31 20" x 8" or 20" x 10" Reducer, In Place - :%' : .,0 EA NA 3,500.00 0.00 32 2" Blow-Off, In Place ' .- '-',5 EA NA 1,800.00 9,000.00 33 6" Blow-Off, In Place •''' rp EA NA 4,570.00 0.00
34 Fire Hydrant - Corn plete, In Place , ..--,- : •8 EA NA 4,690.00 37,520.00 35 6" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place ," ..,-''-• •:'0 EA NA 465.00 0.00 36 8" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place -32 EA NA 640.00 20,480.00 37 10" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place , :.p EA NA 780.00 0.00 SU TOTAL ($) 187,349.87
continued on Sheet 8
Sheet 7 of 15
383
DOC #2022000065339 Page 20 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) ESTIMATE OF COST
Project No, LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC
Item •
Quantity Thick. (In) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
Potable Water Improvements Cont.
38 12" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place 0 EA NA 910.00 0.00
39 16" Elbow 90° or 450, In Place EA NA 2,310.00 0.00
40 20" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place ' ''0 EA NA 3,220.00 0.00 41 6" Valve, In Place EA NA 1,040.00 0.00
42 8" Valve, In Place 25 EA NA 1,270.00 31,750.00
43 10" Valve, In Place ;'o EA NA 1,790.00 0.00
44 12" Valve, In Place . '0 EA NA 2,120.00 0.00
45 16" Valve, In Place ".; ,0 EA NA 4,480.00 0.00
46 20" Valve, In Place '; , -2 EA NA 6,420.00 12,840.00 47 1" Air Release . 6 EA NA 2,500.00 15,000.00
48 2" Air Release ; EA NA 3,740.00 0.00
49 12" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place ;4'4- • 0 IF NA 87,00 0.00 50 14" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 87.00 0.00 51 16" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 97.00 0.00 52 20" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place .0 IF NA 145.00 0.00 53 Backflow Prevention Device - Fire Line .6 EA NA 3,900.00 0.00 54 6" Double Detector Check EA NA 11,000.00 0.00
55 8" Double Detector Check 0 EA NA 15,270.00 0.00
56 10" Double Detector Check EA NA 16,900.00 0.00
57 1" RP Backflow Device '-'d EA NA 725.00 0.00
58 1-1/2" RP Backflow Device .0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
59 2" RP Backflow Device -_•!0 EA NA 1,300.00 0.00
60 6" RP Backflow Device EA NA 11,900.00 0.00
61 8" RP Backflow Device :0 EA NA 16,600.00 0.00
62 Slope Anchor Blocks -;0 EA NA 400.00 0.00
63 Slope Erosion Control LS NA 0.00
64 1" Service, Complete 125 EA NA 1,000.00 125,000.00
65 2" Service, Complete •
0 EA NA 2,130.00 0.00
66 3" Service, Complete 0 EA NA 5,300.00 0,00
67 Encasements 0 IF NA 30.00 0.00
68 8" Tapping Sleeve EA NA 2,900.00 0.00
69 10" Tapping Sleeve 0 EA NA 3,200.00 0.00
70 12" Tapping Sleeve EA NA 3,650.00 0.00
71 Elbow 22.5 degree,'in place 1 2-EA NA • 465.00 465.00 72 ' • 8" DIP-_ • - 193 , IF. „ _NA; - '60.00 - 9,650.00 73 .„. Elboiv, 2215 de-gree, in place; EA NA • .:.640.00 • 3,200.00 721 ,8P.,E1I5ow 11,25; degree, in Place EA 'NA 640.00 640.00 SUBTOTAL (SHEET 8) 198,545.00
TOTAL (SHEET 7 & 8) 385,894.87
ADD 10%
TOTAL
Sheet 8 of 15
38,589.49
424,484.36
384
DOC #2022000065339 Page 21 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in),• Unit Cost ($) item Cost • Grading - - • Earthworks
1 Cut (including over-excavation) 1......I, .0 CY NA 4.00 . 0.00 2 Fill (including over-excavation) . • 1.•• 0
• CY NA , , 4.00 0.00
3 Export •- . , I; .:.,. ,CY NA 10.00 0.00
4 Import „•2'..; -.;•' 0 CY NA 10.00 0.00
5 _. Clearing and Grubbing -.:..',•,'•'.i '0 AC r••
NA 2,000.00 ' 0.00 ,
` .-.... .,•.7, -, • " .•.':- -.71.• •,..1". - ‘14 ';. --.',' ' ..0 , ',.. . . - , L: .: ' •• ' 1 ' 0.00 I • ••••- -..., . ... - • . .. •.,. .•:•.-.-:.• ... ..,....••• , . : ..- . • -_, •---.. •.• .,,,, -.. =-- • _ 0.00 • .- :. ...."::.• a-.) (-:. ''.4",..._ ' :-.', ' •.•,.,.:',".,.-. ,1‘,
i.., .,-,.'.',,; , ::- "..r: . .•.., . ..• , . . .. 0.00 ,. • .. . •--9,,,i':. . ;,:-• •.., '."''i ::: - : - *-ee'a,•..,•=-!•)' •- • -, ...•.... :.... 4.. -- • . . ,, .-, ....--- ...-s- Id *.• " „....,•,‘• .. • -ffi: . it.%' , ' , •-:4- - %..%!' :. ''' A4 . . A. 0.00 r • e, -„. T •' • ..A .... 1 ..., ....•.1 ';.'s';' • #. .....; . ... i,1 ,,Ci% .1. .. •.....•.•.,t •..,- --_,..Is! t . J -Y.. . 1 . j. .. . ..• . ..,. e.. Vtio" •
if ' C.,•S t• e, ' . . .,'• • ..., ,4• • l'' .. ..".•:.,. - - , ..„‘" . . :. , 'S 4 • ' 0.00
" r
aoo
•- , - •• •-;. =. .• - 000
' -- • • -, .•.• 1.'*.2.-•:--., -. Li••4.; .2.".--2. 1;.-'••;"'....,• ...•;,• ' tt*:: •, .• ., ,.,_ • -N _.,. -, 0.00 1, .:T
• . ":41. t.,'- •, .• ,.... , .-- -• • , -,.., ,.•.• 1 ''.•-•::. i 1:..., ....,, `. „ .. „' ; ‘;,V.,.., .-: -2. • L' :, , : ii. .:.. .,... ...,. - = :.• : .1:.•,. _ 4 ‘i - .,r. ..1, . , .-, -•:.i.• .• •:...'' ' . 4. •}•• ' ? • 1 •'•"" .4 s, . ',',..,;•;•,•_, 0.00
;.•••'. .., • '.: Zri."'.3".1•••••••:. .., •?' •:;•::.., - f V,..i.1-1••••.. ..." ' L'.• `..-..'• s.' . " ••••P Is . 7 i ' " • , ' ..' 4.: •T'i 1 XI 0.00 . , ,i,•.: •01. • - ' ' ''t ' . ' 1....e, ,. ' I <-•:"`" ' 1 A, ' ,. , ,•• , tr/ , : . - , : s.,"'„: , ' ." -- t 0.00 I
•-•_,`'.: ; •„":',-:-:,•:-..",,• • •1;,.., -,-...-t- - ; ' . .,".' : --.._ -...'., '-•"..1. '"," '-. ;.':- •'‘ k,...-: : -•-• V:- -..•_.,.-- 0.00 - ,.," ,•,:• :• .--.. - .•••f • .,Nc•.:'_;::1',,',, • ';' "-' : I:, . .::.... 2:- t'• ll''-' . 1::"...--:..‘ " i 1' • ' •• • , • : 1.:, '. ....s.... 0.00 1 , ; • •,,_',L94 1,--„ ::',.,:t,, .:7 ...L., ' „„,, , y-4 :•,- , Y ,. , 7 .;',,„ -,- . . 4 :,,..• •!„.„... , r.....,1.11,,.•,;.:,..... -4.i .t.i4 ,.. •• %,:s. 4. -'' .'a. 1-,...., -.:-,•. ' ;r k4 ,'' • 4 ' .• , . .. ("". € i '. •4 . 0.00
I:4: ; ;. ..; ‘,€ .' :,..:;•:::,'ei,s.''... 1,4:i-li N-Ii:0-: ' ':,'1 A; ..,41.. -"Y. 't, .:11 fr-,..
. .:•. ---;.. ''.....:' 32'''•;fi'H' aoo
:, ,- ....,.,,t.....,, _,.,.,. • . . • „•,. -..,.......,- S. •'•- •- --• - .•• 'S _.• • •-• o.00 000
I.- ' .. .•. • -..., • .,-; ". , : .. .•,--:„.•-..: • ..- ....,.,. . •-. ;•••' ,•„,-.1,..•• ...v‘•••:-:';'. q,--•--- 9; -.:•,,.: 000 I : .., _., .••s•. •-••.-= -.••,,••- ,:: , ----: ••••., ••---- ; :.,. •-....-.....: , -• ...:,•.-.,,,:,•• •,.i. -is-•,.•••••::,..:••:. . L.;•••::•4 - , 9•••.- •., .- : •; ,•.•...-•, • :•• -..-•,,..•-,. : - •••- --.. .•....,. 'Is 000 Ii •..,-).,,,„t :..'-'1".•-, ..:•-'14..1.7-e:t'f: ..;•,' '':.: ;...:.*;' ---'=.- ,` :.`f!47::*..-. 1.:‘..-j, 1-:',', k";:i 11... `i• :',<. ii,..•1:.:- :,.?'..:. ,;:, 0.00 . , .:.- -•• :, ....:1• '...•-•..- , -,-- •••••.', •. s.;e',.....- --•..- . •.• ' • '-' 1:. 4: - •••'‘... ' " •, : •-• . ,..7- ' 0.00

1....e. ' '. '..!.*:••.:',:'-.s....(-.. ...C. s ..' 1:.'•.!.; _-,.;.•_..s.:. - ,;:•:-.!. _ .... - - sq'-- 0.00 „.7 ' '' • t' --t • ' '''` . '. ' ".-- ' , ,', • , .‘ ' -. -`,.. " " .4 , - r.,:, -^•;., e- 4 '', 9, ....' • , ' , • 0.00 I[)-..- 1i.•:'!..1A,?..,'2.' ,.: ,• •..•".....•• ...zr.,•-i,-....t.'': ':::-.1. 1" '-';-i.`,- .2.' ..: •- ,•':o. `.... -;,•-.'--.• .-...,..r -...t .1''' -:.', 0.00 \ ,,,-, e,.: . ',- .; •-.,Ny.. :-,?, , .;.• - ;.%,,---,t: • ', ,,‘. : „s . ,-....1;,:, ,...:.),:-N,,,,, ."1:„;':......:, ',, . ': _',. f; :.. , „1 r. . e, . ., •" s ", . r,- ,,,i, • ....1 • • . ...,..-. ---- , -s •'..': f .t• i. 0.' - P. • .../ ,:, ‘,....'".ii „, ••,---ts .. .05 4 i ...1: ....• `. 0.00 I'‘' .• . r '• aic....0...:'s . ; :: ! • •:. i t•••1 .ys:',, •:.9..... ,. . '5 Si .• . .•.•• si ?s,, t : l is.;,, ,i-.1•1.'!,: ..7...is • _:-..t. 0.00

0.00 I-;' • " ''. , . !,.„,, „ ,. _ ..• .• .• -• -2,. ;• -, , - - ., -; :- ,- ._,.....,, t.. -. ...... ,.. . , .• , . . .., - •'t. 0.00 l'. , r'.: ,•,'..... .- •;•;::'-..'1:,',.-..-‘-.„'- - ' ."J:.;,..•=:' -Y..-- '‘'.' =-'•-•. •e-••••.v:.,:i....,.:. 0.00 I',':1. . . :, , . "...1,:,,ri.11,„--.......,,,, t•-•st;..,•)!:•,,::',,--;,:,,: •',•,••........,9' r-.1.-..',•,. ,.;c • •...: ' -.1 • ;*.•• ; ,;-': .c `, , • : , ‘.:?:-,',0.\'',; ' 1 : • .2 - 0.00 ..-• •-..,,,,,-- ....,,,-. . ;....1-i.,........;;.....t ...-,.-.. v •-.- • - -- .4 • ---. _•-..• •• , , •••, _ , •- :-, , :--r.,;,; 0.00 SUBTOTAL . .00 .1
ADD 10% 0.00
L TOTAL . 0.00 1
Sheet 9 of 15
385
DOC #2022000065339 Page 22 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: L1M01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC .

Item Quantity Unit
r-----.

Thick. (In) Unit Cost ($) .., item Cost . . , Sewer improvements - . . , ' . - -• - 1 AC Pacement, Remove & Repl For Trenching ',;: ' -200 SF NA 22.00 4,400.00 2 Backflow Prevention Device ' .• ;. '9 EA NA 318.00 0.00 3 Cleanout I .,- - t EA NA 72.00 0.00
4 interceptor (Grease, 011, Sand) - •l • 0 EA - NA 4,026.00 0.00 Manhole, , 5' Dia., Precast, w/ T-Lock Coating:
5 6' Deep ' .' •0 EA NA 10,594.00 0.00
6 8' Deep r ... EA NA 11,654.00 0.00 \
7 10' Deep , . -1.4 EA NA 12,713.00 177,982.00
8 PVC, SDR 35,6" ••--. ,:.,'.....! IF NA 25.00 0.00
9 PVC, SDR 35, 8" ' 30,1951 LF NA 36.00 108,705.96
10 PVC, SDR 35, 12" ,.,•', • • IF NA 48.00 0.00
11 Sewer Manhole Ring & Cover (Cast Iron) 7:". ., EA NA 535.00 0.00 12 VCP, 6" " 4 : . •-• IF NA 16.00 0.00
13 VCP, 8" ,

1. 'I.') i LF NA 17.00 0.00
14 Sewer Lateral Complete : •1'... ' 12.1„ EA NA 1,100.00 -, 133,100.00 - - ' :-• ..' •'' :-. • ' i. • •" .'" ‘..-'1'-'' , ...- 0.00 .. • r.• ' 0.00
. ,, ,-, , „,..-; ' 1 , ..„.^- ,- ; • ' . -, ; .: '
:, --, l, r . ,.--". • •. • • 0.00 7
;'• +. ,,'-• ' _ , .• "*.,‘ I,.,_ •-• "....,::C ;.- • . " , - 0.00 . • , - • .. 1,4. ,' , ' •', . t .• o'4• .41, • , ' .1. , •,, ••- ,-.• . , 4, . .,.: . -•i' .... _ ... . k '"' ' 1 • 4. "..-: ; :• . ..--: • p„.- , •- r. .. ••• . r" '' , .... _ ' 0.00 •..• • • , „ , :„.• , .
, •-„ . . -
: , 0.00 • , 0.00
- "" 7 ". --.:1. . .` e ..,-..;-...-, ...;.‘," .. • ''. ' '.: *.:1 ::',... ; :".. : .; ";.. .,:, . ...„ --. 0.00 ,... '- %.,' ',,.e:',%•„,„ . ..H •••-•:,. "• .?':', i'.'.•:',`. • .• ",..1-g ': 'f", ' r' ;.''.!, . k,. 0.00 -'.;_','.' ,-.."''... _':•'•,..! . ... - , ' _ 1-, . ' !,1.',!, ;_:,. ",-:, ..". „ , -„-:., , ..".,:. 0.00 ,, , .•,- . . .... .- - • 1 •- 0.00 .... - ' • .. .. • • 0.00
c -s , ::,:-..„-• - . 2, , :i. - '7.: „..--'•• . , „; - ... :. , “ •0 • ; '` . I ' „ . ' 1 . ,....

I ' '': •
!... ' . ':..',. - 0.00
r•:,, ".:.',1"*.,-, 6t.-.„:;•,' ', . .. -..," „.,..; ,'. _"'..,:'::' ...", '-', '. 4.Z'..-:. ; ':: - ' ::,: ; :1-:, .;.' X.': ...l. 1'"; , .•', 0.00 ' • - 0.00
-. : •, - :, „•._ 0.00
. ..• .•• .. - .- • ` 0.00 , , ':.:'7....., ...: -,: _ •',..-- „ _ .,, • : , . '.. a • _ '-,.. -• •: - '. ' ..:::, . .,.‘• -..x • . -: - i" - :.::: , ;.... 0.00 ' . • . -, •, • ': -•-• ..-.-• ".-• ', -'' ,. - ,•• ' ' -.. -' c.'• ' , ••••••-,. '',••-i " -,-i ... - 0.00 SUBTOTAL 424 187.96
ADD 10% 42,418.80
TOTAL 466,606.76
Sheet 10 of 15
386
DOC #2022000065339 Page 23 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity arG,.......‘Unit -...Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) -•Item Cost , .._ • , -...- IVIonumentation: . . .. . - • • . ? : • ,,, ' • . - 1, County Standard (Well) Monument "•";:- (,.• ., ',.• .2.• 0 EA NA 2,050.00 0.00 2 Tract Boundary Monument •; '••' „,..6 EA NA 775.00 0.00 3 Lot Corner Monument ••. . • • •-;•0 EA NA 525.00 0.00 4 Street Centerline Monument wines 1,•'.a1,-•.a„,. 0 EA NA 1,02S.00- 0.00 ki •• s• ,-,i, •=: ••:• ••••.:. A - -,i ,- -" , •;.-• . • ,• ,••.• .1. • r „,1.. .. •.f .' i.. : .. . 4.. , - 4 ,,••:...,„ ,. • ,....".' "J':.: c f •.., . , , ..., . .s.4 •'. •....j •;_ : c • , ..•. • 0 - 0.00 r-,-:'..-c, .:' ..'2,' ....-e.:_ .,..-''. .:.'a1:2.:"...i..'.: --":, -.1.,....,•:*, o.00 „:..: _-F.-_- . -:,,„, -.: ,-,,,::: •i.,,--.....•-:., 0.00 - -..; . ••; --v... • - -_•, : = ., -. :." .- •;• : - , • -• , , a__., • ,•.- ..- -.. - ;•• •-•• !., 0.00 -_,, ':•••'• ',.;.'-•"- ... `•, ; (2.-..."..,%=•.: s=.:-.. -•,: '-..:.:::.:_ ..../....s. -:!.... " ,)'' -%.. "--,:-.,. _2 .l'---;._ 0.00 ;a . ,.' •,.-'•:......-r( , ., ,a.::•:7-•;s:•):i,--;_. r.;(47,....;.,"._ '-..... ;,......%1, ... .;-,I..,..,•. ...,`''- . „,...;c.,..- • %._•: 0.00 •-• • A . , ..i: ; . " - ' .. ..1, ' • i:,.•• ;7 :2, is le •.• .. ". ' -;• ••• ,•,'.' • " • ` '.,...• ! .•••! • s'' . )1' , 1, ...,,,t,1•,,• t `I ./.. "-.:•. •,..:, .4 .;••'- .. • , ,, - \,• . ? •' " ,• . •.-. •., ' , -• ,4 :. -•••!,`, • );•"‘,. -,:t 0.00 • .r s•- : ,- • '•.•• 7, ••.' :"• ••;* •- • •• •• .'• ,..: -*'. i ; •0 '..• -. • '. i'`C. , .„ , . ",i•.-1.' I _ . , : . • ..• •••,-;. "._ . . .. . ts.-••• 1 •• 't• IC-, ; , • . , • , 0.00 '.k. t .. . Fs. ''..:...7-::::.. i .‘ ; t .. ,:.• :. ;•-•:....,1 ..... 1.. " • .. • ' .:'s: •::,a ”.............' 0.00 •. , • . '•'• - ••-•:•. • •; •:.••••••- • ,, - ••• ' - rt• - -..- • •,„• , a..-, • • ...;_•• • 0.00 i•.-i• i"•;;. "a•.'?-,.-4--- . ':: ',1'-'-`r.-•t: '''.."„t's: : -_,••• ,••', ,i„-"•:-• .'. •,..3 ' •, '•-,‘ 1:-.'.....'„•;•t ..V.•';••:..,..12:‘ I. -..t.- ,.:•'a 0.00 ).-f ••."' . .'. f•',;•• _ ,'",".';'..,;',-..: :.,!„ .:,.• -..... 4 s.-',--:' ....;••• '..-a-'..a: k't I. ; " '.''.. %;".if '1.,.. 0.00 , 4_ ' '-'. -'' rr-".... !. ••• 1 .- ....." . 1 - - .‘ • , , .. •'...) . ,.. 14".`l - . ' • - 1 _ . _%. -.1 I, .. .2. • •v: 0.00 - -2 • , • • • - .• -• ;,.; ', .. .... • . :._ -N:-.,-':. , " '`. • ''': :- s' . •••. • . ...I.: -1 -•‘-•.• • *•• ' • ' . '` 0.00 •-•,• •:.. •,-;••••••,::,.. . ......., •••••,. „..„ ,,t, .. •,''., , ,:r , •',..... ,-,. 1::....Z.::'' ;':-. ., r, ,e•1, e ,.• I•,.z., I, ... ' -•,* 1..,„ 0.00 is:- :. ••• i‘j..' '',7:-.'.:.•; -: I-',-:...-.:.'-• '-,)','.ii:::/•:..., .' i.; ,:•,.. / : • ..,,..• *, .- *, -,,,, I:, 000.00 ,..'a.'.••••.:-,.. ":••••tz,•.,.,:_:••,-.• ,",;.• ',••.,:- .: ••-•_ •)2."-se•-, `.,,..,..,•..• ,=••- &„ -.. .. .7 ..? ; • - :„- 0.00 • . .0, •., -:. .. n •" ,.. -• . 4.!, • •, .4.•,- -.; ., ..: _•.,•.....-- , ..,• •-•.••.•-; .•:.•.- •. - -,...... • ,-, ,..., ,...,.. -k .• . -- ,,-, ...- •..•••, , •,,. _...,.... t. • •••,. „ , ,,. , .. •. _ a ....••s„,...- 0.00 - .. -,:.: , • , . '.,,,..f.;:-, : •-.:•-.....,:... ' '..•• '•:': 't... , - • . : ...; ,. -, .,-r. 0.00 t. • , , -:,, •%z•-• • • '4 .-• • ‘'. i.,,, -, • .i.: ,'. ,*.- ,..•,, ,.. s• . _ • • -..r. •. ,. aim J•.NN.:....1-1....' *.`Q's.:,:.fr. '' fi•$1.iv `.--;..1. .;.'..',„'. 1.i.' ..--.,-.'. 1.i' •:.'..:- .•::. 0.00 -- i`..s. •..- ., 0... ...--%...a....: , ...-...:.... a: L. •...: .- - i.• ---, 1,"0.• •!, .-_,-;.,. 0.00 1/4. .• , ...,. • t., ••. _.....- .••.-:'- • ..,.., _.- •, .- - - ,-.. ••••ii i. .. . -_: . i••... ,,... 0.00 „1. . , f , :... _•• .. . , e ', ..• r. •• • , . **; ••• • ; • *-7` ; 2, 0.00 1-•;.. 1.::•,•.' ..-- •:,\Pe.'•fz-•-:,-4..•" '-',..'•••/,• :,.-.i•.:..1',.. ,., -:'••••ss ...•,,,,---:-•f-, i••.i,.. :-,. ; _•'..•• ..,-...;7' 0.00 ;i`,,'-.;; :: ,: ..x;•, -,..,-;•„-,:`,:•,--;.,...1,-....,-1, i'....".F'0„,f, -‘•-,;•:...,': :•,,'rr.•:,--1::..-: ir.,•'•',; 1•';-•• .1-, ,tr. .,--:: 0.00 •-.g a-••.•':s.-';•-•'-':-..2-.• •-"I',' ••••‘•,r .?..1..-•:(•:,,-.'. ,..' .--"•••••':'; 1:•'-'a. ',' ,' • • 0.00 ..;- • .-- t ••-,---,:, .,•;-,;:- 1 :. • ',"-,.•2,1-;'! _ '...-•_. ,• •;e:- ;;;-' .--* ' •-,. •" •-•"-' :" ., -; • i - a. :......."--.. -2'. •••. ; '2.,,•s'.:•-,-..' •--._, -.....? • " '', .: ' ':;....; • ';,'- ,. •-__,','.s _-_ 0.00 -t'.'. . '•vc'_ : '.- •-,-S. •••:; -...2%..'2,:" '-'•:;:* • s•.' --•-','f'• '.'•.-: : :s: .;• "......-:'•/''.-:-1-.' -' 0.00 ''t%,, :, • '‘-:;::`,Sze:#i',"; :.;,,; `-'"•-•‘ : -,/''' 1 ":."),•:' `'Cv4 ..' .; '-' •-;....'. ....:'..,:'..: :z.., s'",..-;'_, 0.00 a-‘, • • --;15: ,-t•.•,,-,.--...*'• • z: •'•,:'.'''',-,• .. _•-.•.7), • ;Y.: :‘,..-.:,.-;. , is:-... .- .0, - ".r. z : ,-,.'•:„. --.', ._. '•,- 0.00 f SUBTOTAL 0.00 I
ADD 10% _ 0.00
1- TOTAL 0.00
Sheet 11 of 15
387
DOC #2022000065339 Page 24 of 27

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)

CITY OF SANTA PAULA
r1EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTBMATE OF COST
-------PrOra-t-No:,. -PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC
Item Quantity Unit' .ThIck. (in) Unit Co 'i rs., Item Cost Reclaimed Water Improvements .' • ,•.,
1 6" PVC C-900, CL 150 ,: '_ 0 LF NA- 29.00 r-076(r\
2 8" PVC C-900, CL 150 , ' 0 LF NA 35.00 0.00 ---1,
3 10" PVC C-900, CL 150 .. ' 0 LF NA 46.00 0.00
4 12" PVC C-900, CL 150 , .0 LF NA 68.00 0.00
5 6" PVC C-900, CL 200 Q LF NA 33.00 0.00
6 8" PVC C-900, CL 200 ' •' 0 LF NA 41.00 0 00
7 10" PVC C-900, CL 200 '. 0 LF NA 52.00 0.00
8 12" PVC C-900, CL 200 , 0 LF NA 72.00 0.00
9 6" Tee, In Place -0 EA NA 452.00 0.00
10 8" x 6" Tee, In Place , .• 0 EA NA 655.00 0.00

11. 8" Tee, In Place i. 0 EA NA 685.00 0.00
12 10" x 6" Tee or 10" x 8" Tee, In Place , . 0 EA NA 950.00 0.00 13 10" Tee, In Place " 0 EA NA 1,015.00 -„ 0.00
14 12" Tee, In Place - •••0 EA NA 1,210.00 ' . 0.00
15 8" Cross, In Place ; ‘" ••'' 0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
16 10" Cross, In Place " , •': 0 EA NA 1,300.00 0.00,,
17 12" Cross, In Place ' 0 EA NA 1,500.00 0.00
18 8" x 6" Reducer, In Place " 0 EA NA 453.00 0.00
19 10" x 8" Reduced, In Place 0 EA NA 640.00 0.00
20 12" x 8" or 12" x 10" Reducer, In Place 0 EA NA 890.00 0.00 21 2" Blow-Off, In Place . . ' Q EA NA 1,800.00 0.00
22 6" Blow-Off, In Place , , .. , '0 EA NA 4,570.00 0,00 23 6" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place -. • .0 EA NA 465.00 0.00 24 8" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place . .. ' 0 EA NA 640.00 0.00 25 10" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place , ' • ' .,: 0 EA NA 780.00 0.00 26 12" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place ,•••', :0 EA NA 910.00 0.00 27 6" Valve, In Place . 0 EA NA 1,040.00 0.00
28 8" Valve, In Place . .„0 EA NA 1,270.00 0.00
29 10" Valve, In Place : 0 EA NA 1,790.00 0.00
30 12" Valve, In Place ' ' . 0 EA NA 2,120.00 0.00
31 1" Air Release • '• :0 EA NA 2,500.00 0.00
32 2" Air Release '0 EA NA 3,740.00 0.00
33 1" RP Backflow Device •0 EA NA 725.00 0.00
34 1-1/2" RP Backflow Device ' ‚0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
35 2" RP Backflow Device „ 0 EA NA 1,300.00 0.00
36 6" RP Backflow Device . ,,Q EA NA 11,900.00 0.00
37 8" RP Backflow Device ' ' 0 EA NA 16,600.00 0.00
38 Slope Erosion Control '0 LS NA 0.00
SU TOTAL ($) -1 0.00
continued on Sheet 13
Sheet 12 of 15
388
DOC #2022000065339 Page 25 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROTENTS) ESTIMATE OF COST
-Project No. LIIV101.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC
Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
„ Reclaimed Water IMpimuements Cont.
38 16" Elbow 90° cir 450, In Place EA NA 2,310.00 0.00
39 20" Elbow 90° qr 450, In Place - o EA -• • NA 3,220.00 0.00 40 16" Valve, In Place .•••0 EA NA 4,480.00 0.00
41 20" Valve,' In Place •••• '
• ,-, 0 EA NA 6,420.00 0.00
42 12" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 87.00 0.00 43 14" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 87.00 0.00 44 16" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 97.00 0.00 45 20" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place .; • 0 IF NA 145.00 0.00 46 Backflow Preventio Device - Fire Line 0 EA NA 3,900.00 0.00 47 6" Double Decector Check EA NA 11,000.00 0.00
48 8" Double Detector Check .1 1,4. s'et) EA NA 15,270.00 0.00 49 10" Double Detector Check t• o EA NA 16,900.00 0.00
50 Slope Anctior Blocks • f• EA NA 400.00 0.00
51 1" Service, Complete 0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
52 2" Service, Complete 7.7f EA NA 2,130.00 0.00
53 3" Service, complete • EA NA 5,300.00 0.00
54 Encaseinents LF NA 30.00 0.00
55 8" Tapping Sleeve , • •• •
EA NA 2,900.00 0.00
56 10" Tapplig Sleeve EA NA 3,200.00 0.00
57 12" Tapphig Sleeve l•foltf,:t EA NA 3,650.00 0.00
• ;. " • ; • • • .; • r - 0.00
• '44 •' •••••*%.-;• ••'; • t' 0 . • . • ;F••••- .,• r, ' • '••- • „ ' „. ::•"• % ,. • :•• ;,_ • 0.00 • ••

1... • • r IP • • .. • -AV • •• • 0.00
, • i ,•L'.•,*•'..• ; •-, , 0.00 ,..•••••• , : • P.',,
1•0 t. I. 1' I •" • .- 0.00
• ‘. • s • ••• . • 0.00 r.• • • i• I
401 • • •• • 1 • - al • • •. • • • 1.• •j• -*-1i-....% • •• 1.• : 0.00 • , „.- . • %.d. • t! J.• 0.00
•.--••1;*.•". • „ - ••• .'„te .• •••• • • 0.00
'.•• •,•-'v,:•„;:';';.•:•,••%; • , • '•••• ; • ' ' • 1,3 0.00 -k• :1;t:, A j,
; • 0.00
, - r • , , ". ... . • ,:.. - . . , • . . ..... . 1. • .. •• .e. •.•• !• r.......7. • '-' ,• ' 0.00
,..,,.. ,
.' ' .-
• . 1.„ ,`p , ....4.
'
• • . ., . 0..... , " •• . Or: ... '• .:_ r ' - ' . . L.. :I. i...4.' , • .

I • ..• .. .
-.• ,
.. ' s.f. •' ' 0.00
.,,,,. • ...e. A:. ,,,„ . r Z .. ;1'4: . , •.‘. .• ; ...... , I •*
,
: ill •,' ..."."-,-, , •• • • . - • ,• .
.. . 0.00
•r• • .
" ;• . • " ' - ,•
41•:,. • • •
• • ••
SUBTOTAL SHEET 13
TOTAL (SHEET 12 & 13)
ADD 10%
TOTAL
Sheet 13 of 15

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 389
DOC #2022000065339 Page 26 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) item Cost
, Misc. Water SiSeiNer' Improvements - - • ..
n ge. •- -.?„,- :.-- --.:.a 0.00
.. -... . . .. 0.00
•'''. ;••?' : ' ' c•:,•21,','• .• -'''';'-.. ••?: it.. ..';''-'; ' t ,.).....:•••:,. -'., ' a-`... ' ' I' • - ' . MOO •-• .
' - • , .. . 1, •a t .. " MOO , --• • • ' :, • - . ,--:,a_-' - ,L.- - :,,. • '• • - "tt• • : • ... •. ..- • .• U." ' • aoo .',:. ,,c, r - , , .. •••• • ...4. .. h. 4 • .,
• ..› x,'•' I . ''''' - -.." :%, '. . I
; . • i .1' • •
'4' . ',...-.

C..' ..•
'''
. ' .•
' 0 • '
I t,.. • .:• • t 2A. •
. . 0.00
... , ,1 • . - •. • - 0.00
•.• go• .. --.: •-,.•cl- :.... 4,- ..-• . t ' : •...•.r...-: • 0.00 ... - L••• • '',..: ......• t -, • " . • ..• • h • • ..; i ' i• • • h %••.r. ,.. • . ' ' '. •• • ' I • • '2 1 • (100 d

4. 's ' • " . •I:'•;:.:.% . '-' :.;•:' • :-:..'r. ... 1.: "c•-/ 17: - .....• . .7 L. `..- -... s F: . 4 .• ...1. .. -..* . 0.00 , q: •., .., •:. •.;•--, ,.., •- '4I.^ ,,.:. : . ti '''' /' ' n''' - s' a ' "- ' " ' ' ." ' 0.00 . •,_ - •. . -. .•.,-.. • ....•-• --:•,-. - - 0.00 ., ., I, '-.;
04" • .0 .40 -. : .-;....., •-•: , .,,,,4z.,,.
v.--,-•-• .,..,..:01,_ . - „. -......1 . '..-:. .. •,:- •••,=••• •--__. • •.. : . . , •N;
*,
•Te - -ft .•4, ._-, . -u., • ••.•:. •" -a 0.00 - ••, 1,„ • • .. a. . •••• , a . '. ' ‘. - . 0.00 a, , • . •_.•-_, 4, e.- ....• •,:, .5 •••_:-..., -• •. a./. -.. ,, ••••,-• :' ;• - , a_. • . , • . I. • 0.00 , ,, , E,'..._, •••... '1 . "i_ ',. . •--...,..; . . .: , 4' . ‘. . - I.' ' Y. „ .' ."..= o 0.00 :• "
• -•,- t rs.". ". : •' . . ,... ;'.., ----.. •••• ,, '1>. •.",.: ;1/4"-.,i.--, - '' : '"-- • ,• , ' : 'I -. MOO _ . . =. .-'-„ : . , ,' ,. ... 0.00 •.•---, .-.1 a..,, ..:.a.••a• '-'%,"-•_ a. 1,,..: .-. :-. a. : ' ,...,.• - ••'•.,..., • ,•-: .._ . - ._ 0.00 ,:..--..- :,•.44:1 ••••f... --.. ,,,-.• , •,:......a.a, •-t."....•_ at...' , r• - ••••••. 4.• , •.„ , •.. a, MOO ., - ..
-, - •,,: ,„„...a• ,,:. •::L$ e ,
' -... ''' ' • • ' k •••• • • : .. •tt .:-?..-- ' .. .i ..:.., .:. • •••..... • - .....‘; .• ; ,‘ . .• '1• , 0.00 ", • 1 . ; ,. • .• 1 , .: .• • .4..4.4 'e ` . ..•'''. ,-•• 1. ••' • • s

0.00 `_1.-•• • • .••,., ,, f, • . • ' l' •• . .. aa.i ,.• .-•• 2 ' .-. :.: - ..:- ...••••.... .,.:,•• ' ',a. -,'-f'.. • -,• .. 0..0 • •,,•.: ,. t• -1.: :1 . ,1.•4i",* - '•' • ••,• • .., 7., v '', .1 ‘•44... MOO
k.....4 V 0.00
. ..„ .• S.\0,r;;;C•,... ,Z7.t ..: .. . . .. .;;;':. '' '''• t":1:: II r.if:ti.':. .... G ...2.;/' .• '..: 0.00 - " f i•- - ,_ .. 0.00
a? 1, a.:,• ...., .. , 0.00
• ",n).:''..-::, .•:', ••• • • - , . ,..t..i. • a - . .••••• , ... , .,..... ",. •, 0.00 •-••
.: •-: -, ,. ••••••.. , 7 .•• .. , "' 'S. ..:,• , ..o. : -. L I ' 0.00 e• 1.-:'-t•?•....". .,';'-...,."...'-,:l..,,c1 ' ; '..-'.....':-,:i-. %-1-:•:, ;.--,-.,-1.',,-.:.'.' '-‘..-', '' , :•--.. ,,- `-r- o.00 • - . . .. 0.00
r - i. • :r., - , n• ....•I, . „• -,.; ..„-, , .= , . , . , ..: ' •"4 ' . I;-%••• ' ..• ..g?' ,'.. • ,' . ,.• 4.: ' , .•::.4 3 b' -," . -.',`.;, ' .' " . '...'" ... ; ‘. ir. ..... • - • 1 As • 0.00 - i• • ..• 4. 2 • .; . .. '!....4 15 ...-: ..... :14 ....1.: a.t ,-, , % ..... .. ' . !,...: . '''',, ,..:-.4- ' . ., 0.00 _ !„--::.a.' . ...• :. ,, .., : -...:41/4-4-„::.•••:211 ;:•:Zja.....•.• '.. MOO - i-;••• ; ...-a.“ .,,.:„. ......i•„: :.,:t.', 7..r1...- .t2...- t'''.. -
..- , ;-.',.' .• ,.-_,:^:,:,- % aoo . 0.00
SUBTOTAL 0.00 _
ADD 10% 1 0.00 -
- ..._
TOTAL 0.00
Sheet 14 of 15
390
DOC #2022000065339 Page 27 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No:
• ",FEE EST1MAT,E5.8HEET
••:" j›; •';': s • •‘. • • ;i•
• , t
1, • '`Ce i•-•••: . ' •
•f.

Total City of Santa Paula Grading:

Total City of Santa Paula Public Imp.:

SWPCP Fee: Total Lot Acreage (See Sheet 10):

SWPPP Fee:

Improvement Plan Check Fee:

Grading Plan Check Fee:

General Plan Fee:

Soils & Geology Fee: **worm/wog Costs MayBe Added to this Fee) Grading Permit Fee:
(See Sheet 1)
(See Sheet 1)
0 Improvement Inspection Fee:

Grading Inspection Fee:

Total City of Santa Paula
Submittal Fees
Total City of Santa Paula
Inspection Fees
Pee Estimates Sheet 15 of 15

0.00 995,715.57
400
0 21,925.02
1,000.00
9,957.16
500.00
750.00
34,532.18
22,800.02
1,000.00
23,800.02
391
65283.00302\42569468.2

EXHIBIT C
TO

PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT
Amendment to Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map No. 6065 (Tract Map No. 6074)
[Attached behind]
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
65283.00302\42570641.1
5 EXHIBIT B
Partial Assignment to Lennar (Lot 2-4)
[attached behind]
417
65283.00302\42446148.6

RECORDING AT THE REQUEST OF

AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO

CITY OF SANTA PAULA
970 Ventura Street
Santa Paula, California 93060
ATTN: City Clerk
(Exempt from Filing Fees – Gov’t Code §6103)
______________________________________________________________________ Space Above This Line Reserved For Recorder’s Use

PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF

AMENDED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
(Sewer and Water)
TRACT NO. 6074 Lots 2, 3 & 4
APN Nos: 107-0-360-035, 107-0-360-045 & 107-0-360-015
This Partial Assignment of Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“Partial Assignment”) is entered into as of _______________, 2024 by and among Limoneira Lewis Community Builders, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”), Lennar Homes of California, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Assignee”), and the City of Santa Paula, a California municipal corporation (“City”). Assignor, Assignee, and City are from time to time referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. This Partial Assignment of Agreement pertains to certain real property identified as Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Tract No. 6074 (“Property”). Under that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement entered on November 29, 2021 (“Purchase and Sale Agreement”) by and between Assignor and Assignee, Assignor obligated Assignee to replace its share of the performance bond posted by Assignor (Bond No. 024255508 – Liberty Mutual) (“Bond”) securing specified public improvements serving the Property and transferred the obligation to complete the improvements to Assignee, including the obligation to complete all work, if any remaining, necessary to have the City accept the water and sewer improvements described in Exhibit A (“Sewer and Water Improvements”) and obtain final release of the Bond.

B. Pursuant to Title 16 of the Santa Paula Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code sections 66410 et seq.), Assignor and City entered into that certain Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map No. 6065 for the completion of Improvements (as described in Exhibit “B” attached thereto), dated as of April 6, 2022, and recorded against the Property in the Official 418
65283.00302\42446148.6
Records of the County of Ventura (the “Official Records”) on June 8, 2022 as Instrument No. 2022000065339 (“Map 6065 Subdivision Improvement Agreement”), attached hereto as Exhibit B. Map 6065 Subdivision Improvement Agreement was subsequently amended in 2023 in order to replace Parcel Map No. 6065 with Tract Map No. 6074, as detailed in Recital C.

C. On or around April 5, 2023, Assignor and City entered that certain Amendment to Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract Map No. 6074, recorded in the Official Records on May 15, 2023 as Instrument No. 2023000033520 (the “Amendment”), attached hereto as Exhibit C. The Amendment was entered to supersede Parcel Map No. 6065 to further subdivide the Property and build 121 condominium units and private streets. The Amendment did not alter the public improvements to be completed. The Map 6065 Subdivision Improvement Agreement as amended by the Amendment is hereafter referred to as the “Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement.”
D. Section 29 (Binding Upon Successors) of the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement does not prohibit Assignor from assigning any interest in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement to successors.

E. In October 30, 2023, Assignor sold the Property to Assignee and Lot 1 of Tract 6074 to builder Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Richmond”). On or about November 28, 2023, Assignee entered into a land bank transaction with AG EHC II (LEN) CA 3, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Land Bank”). In connection therewith, (i) the Property was conveyed to Land Bank pursuant to that certain Grant Deed recorded in the Official Records on November 28, 2023, as Document No. 2023000077534; (ii) Assignor has agreed to construct the certain improvements; and (iii) Land Bank will hold fee title to the Property until such time as it is conveyed to Assignor or other third parties.

Land Bank consents to the recordation of this Agreement as evidenced by its signature below.

F. On June 19, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 7509 to authorize the acceptance of the Sewer and Water Improvements concurrently with City’s receipt of certified as-built drawings for Tract No. 6074.

G. Assignor now desires to assign to Assignee certain of its rights, duties and obligations under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement with respect to the Property and Sewer and Water Improvements, and Assignee desires to accept and assume such rights, duties and obligations, on the terms and conditions set forth below.

H. On or around the same date Assignor enters this Partial Assignment with Assignee, Assignor intends to enter into a separate partial assignment of the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Richmond (“Richmond Partial Assignment”) to assign the balance of Assignor’s rights, duties and obligations 419
65283.00302\42446148.6
under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement relating to the Sewer and Water Improvements.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Recitals. The Parties agree that the above recitals are true and correct.

2. Effective Date. The terms and provisions of this Partial Assignment shall become effective upon execution by all the Parties and its recordation in the Official Records (“Effective Date”).

3. Partial Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations. Except as expressly stated herein, Assignor hereby transfers and assigns to Assignee, and Assignee hereby expressly and unconditionally accepts and assumes the rights, duties and obligations of Assignor under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement including, without limitation, all of the general rights, duties, and obligations of Assignor under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement and all covenants, warranties, waivers, and releases of the Assignor set forth in the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement, with respect to the Property and Water and Sewer Improvements. Assignee agrees to observe and fully perform its assigned share of Assignor’s obligations under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and to be subject to related terms and conditions thereof, it being the express intention of both Assignor and Assignee that, upon the Effective Date of this Partial Assignment, Assignee shall become one of the assignees substituted for Assignor as the “SUBDIVIDER under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement, with respect to the Property. The assigned rights and obligations described in this Section are referred to hereafter as “Assignee’s Assumed Rights and Obligations.”

4. Estimated Cost of Water and Sewer Improvements.

A. The estimated costs of Water and Sewer Improvements assigned to Assignee is $540,768.60.

5. Secured Obligations. Assignee shall provide City with surety bond(s) issued by The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, a New Hampshire corporation, which is the same surety Richmond must use under its partial assignment of the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The surety bond amounts provided by Assignee and Richmond, taken together, shall meet the requirements of Section 11 of the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement with respect to the Sewer and Water Improvements.

Accordingly, Assignee will post warranty bonds in the amount of $54,076.86, representing 10% of the amount shown in Exhibit “A” to this Partial Assignment, to secure performance of Assignee’s obligations under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement.

Upon receipt of such warranty bonds from Assignee and Richmond and the Effective Date of this Partial Assignment and the Richmond Partial Assignment, City shall authorize the 420
65283.00302\42446148.6
reduction of any bonds or other security posted by Assignor to secure performance of its obligations under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement to $104,624.45, which represents the remainder of the total estimated costs of improvements (i.e. streets, removals, and adjustments) stated in the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement after deducting the estimated costs for the Sewer and Water Improvements.

6. Release. Assignor shall be free from any liabilities accruing on or after the Effective Date of this Partial Assignment with respect to Assignee’s Assumed Rights and Obligations. Thereafter, no breach or default of Assignee’s Assumed Rights and Obligations shall be attributed to Assignor.

7. Indemnity. In addition to assuming Assignor’s obligations to the City under Section 19 (Indemnification) of the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement as they pertain to the Property or Water and Sewer Improvements, Assignee agrees to protect and indemnify Assignor and City from and against any and all claims, losses, or expenses that arise from any failure by Assignee or Land Bank to comply with the terms and provisions of this Partial Assignment.

8. Fully Assumed Obligations. For the avoidance of doubt and in accordance with the Purchase and Sale Agreement, Assignee assumes the following rights and obligations in full with respect to the Property and Water and Sewer Improvements:

Section 5 (Completion by City), Section 6 (Warranty of Improvements Plans), Section 7 (City Not Liable for Plans and Specifications), Section 8 (Warranty of Work), Section 9 (Repairs and Replacements), Section 10 (City’s Right of Entry), Section 12 (Maintenance Bonds), Section 13 (Performance by City or Surety), Section 14 (Surety Bond to Include Letter of Credit), Section 15 (Best Management Practices), Section 16 (Ownership of Documents), Section 17 (Independent Contractor), Section 16 (Cash Charges).

10. City’s Consent. By signing this Partial Assignment, the City Manager, on behalf of the City, consents to this Partial Assignment and acknowledges that Assignor shall be released from Assignee’s Assumed Rights and Obligations as of the Effective Date.

11. Attorneys’ Fees. In any legal action or other proceeding brought by any party to enforce or interpret a provision of this Partial Assignment, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and any other costs, including actual fees and costs of experts, incurred in that proceeding in addition to any other relief to which it is entitled.

12. Notices. All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be considered given either: (i) when delivered in person to the recipient named below; or (ii) on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt, after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope as either registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, and postage and postal charges prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below. All notices shall be addressed as follows:

If to Assignor: LIMONEIRA LEWIS COMMUNITY BUILDERS, LLC 1156 N. Mountain Avenue
Upland, CA 91786
421
65283.00302\42446148.6
Attn: John Goodman
If to Assignee: Lennar Homes of California, LLC
2000 Fivepoint, 3rd Floor
Irvine, CA 92618
Attn: Amy Weaver
If to City: CITY OF SANTA PAULA
Public Works Department
P.O. Box 569
Santa Paula, California 93060
Attn: Director of Public Works
Either party may, by notice given at any time, require subsequent notices to be given to another person or entity, or to a different address, or both. Notices given before actual receipt of notice of change shall not be invalidated by the change.

13. Governing Law. This Partial Assignment has been made in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflicts of laws principles, and exclusive venue for any action involving this Agreement will be in the County of Ventura.

14. Binding Effect.

A. The terms of this Partial Assignment constitute a burden and benefit upon the Property (or applicable portion thereof). Accordingly, this Partial Assignment will be recorded and the terms will run with the Property and become binding upon all subsequent owners of the Property (or applicable portions thereof).. This Partial Assignment shall be binding on Land Bank, in its capacity as the owner of the Property; provided however that: (i) City acknowledges and agrees that Assignee shall be entitled to perform all of obligations under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement and this Partial Assignment (including without limitation, the obligation to provide insurance and bonds) rather than Land Bank; (ii) City will in all cases accept performance from Assignee rather than Land Bank; and (iii) upon its transfer of the Property (or any portion thereof), Land Bank shall be released from all obligations and liabilities under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement and this Partial Assignment with respect to the portion of the Property so transferred. In the event Land Bank conveys the Property or any portion thereof to a party other than Assignee (hereafter, the “Third Party Owner”), the Third Party Owner will acquire the applicable portion of the Property subject to the covenants and obligations under this Partial Assignment which are to be performed upon the portion of the Property so transferred after the date of transfer.

B. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary in the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement or this Partial Assignment, upon the transfer of any portion of the Property with a completed home that has been issued a temporary or final 422
65283.00302\42446148.6
certificate of occupancy (a “Completed Home”) or the transfer of any portion of the Property to a homeowner’s association, governmental agency, or utility company (a “Common Area”), the transferee of the Completed Home (the “Home Buyer”) or Common Area shall have no obligations or liabilities under the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement or this Partial Assignment and the portion of the Property transferred to any such Home Buyer (the “Completed Home Lot”) or Common Area shall be automatically released from the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement and this Partial Assignment. For avoidance of doubt, upon any such transfer to a Home Buyer or transfer of a Common Area, the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement and this Partial Assignment shall no longer be a burden or benefit upon the Completed Home Lot or Common Area and shall no longer be a covenant with respect to such Completed Home Lot or Common Area. Any title company or other third party (including a Home Buyer or transferee of a Common Area) may rely upon the foregoing provisions and any title company may and shall remove the Amended Subdivision Improvement Agreement and this Partial Assignment as an exception to title affecting any portion of any Completed Home Lot or transferred Common Area.

15. Compliance with the Law. Assignee will comply with all laws applicable to this Partial Assignment including, without limitation, federal, state, and local laws requiring permitting and licenses. All such compliance will be at Assignee’s own cost.

16. Construction. The language of each part of this Partial Assignment will be construed simply and according to its fair meaning, and this Partial Assignment will never be construed either for or against a Party.

17. Severability. If any portion of this Partial Assignment is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Partial Assignment will continue in full force and effect.

18. Captions. The captions of the paragraphs of this Partial Assignment are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Partial Assignment.

19. Waiver. Waiver of any provision of this Partial Assignment will not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor will such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.

20. Authority/Modification. This Partial Assignment is subject to and conditioned upon approval and ratification by the Santa Paula City Council. This Agreement is not binding upon City until executed by the City Manager. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Partial Assignment and to engage in the actions described herein. This Partial Assignment may be modified by written agreement. City’s City Manager may execute any such amendment on behalf of City in accordance with all applicable laws, instruments, agreements, and approvals.
423
65283.00302\42446148.6

21. Counterparts. This Partial Assignment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Partial Assignment has been entered into by and between Assignor and Assignee as of the day and year first above written. [Signatures on following pages]
424
65283.00302\42446148.6

SIGNATURE PAGE
TO

PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT
ASSIGNOR:

LIMONEIRA LEWIS COMMUNITY BUILDERS, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: __________________________
David Lauletta
Authorized Agent
425
65283.00302\42446148.6

SIGNATURE PAGE
TO

PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT
ASSIGNEE:

Lennar Homes of California, LLC
a California limited liability company
By: _____________________________
Amy Weaver
Authorized Agent
426
65283.00302\42446148.6

SIGNATURE PAGE
TO

PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT

CITY OF SANTA PAULA
By: ____________________________
Daniel Singer
City Manager
ATTEST:

By: _____________________________
Julie Latshaw
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _____________________________
Monica Castillo
City Attorney
427
65283.00302\42446148.6
AG EHC II (LEN) CA 3, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, is the owner in fee simple of the Property and hereby consents to the recordation of this Partial Assignment.

AG EHC II (LEN) CA 3, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership
By: Essential Housing Asset Management, LLC,
an Arizona limited liability company,
its Authorized Agent
By:

Steven S. Benson, its Manager
428
65283.00302\42446148.6

EXHIBIT A
TO

PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT
Water and Sewer Improvements & Cost Estimate
(Tract 6074 Lots 2, 3 & 4)
[Attached behind]
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
65283.00302\42446148.6

EXHIBIT B
TO

PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map No. 6065 [Attached behind]
446
RECORDING REQUESTED BY/e_Au
LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY Cer f

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Santa Paula
970 Ventura Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
No fee per Government Code § 6103
egfibigft171.1-
tqc) K1: lobo- ¿do- lqs--
2022000065339
Recorded In Of Ventura County Records Clerk Mark A. Lunn -Recorder 08/08/2022

01.18 PM VEN
8ANENI7
%ties* 1 Pages' 27
Fees: $0 00 wina Room/

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
Parcel Map NO. 6065
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 194k day of ,zoa_.,„ by and between the CITY OF SANTA PAULA, a general law city and municipal corporation ("CITY") and LIMONEIRA LEWIS COMMUNITY BUILDERS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company ("SUBDIVIDER").

The Parties agree as follows:

1. RECITALS. This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts and objectives:

A. SUBDIVIDER presented CITY with a final subdivision map on land identified as Parcel Map No. 6065 ("Map").

B. SUBDIVIDER requested that CITY approve the Map before construction and completion of improvements including, without limitation, streets system (roads, parking lots, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, traffic control devices, street name signs, street lights, street trees, storm drains, and bridges); potable water system; wastewater (sewer) system; recycled water system; electric, natural gas, and communication utility facilities; grading and earth retaining structures; flood control facilities; and walls and fences ("Improvements") which are part of or appurtenant to the subdivision ("Subdivision") identified on the Map. The Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications on file with CITY.

C. This Agreement is entered into in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act ("Act") and applicable ordinances adopted by CITY including, without limitation, as codified in the Santa Paula Municipal Code ("SPMC"). 447
DOC #2022000065339 Page 2 of 27

2. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS. At its sole cost and expense, SUBDIVIDER agrees to furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and for doing all the work necessary to complete the Improvements on the Map set forth in the approved plans and specifications and in conformance with the Map's conditions of approval, CITY standards, and federal and state requirements.

3. ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS.

A. The estimated cost of Improvements is $995,715.57.

B. A copy ofthe cost estimate is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference.

4. COMPLETION. SUBDIVIDER shall complete the Improvements within thirty-six (36) months after recording the Map or within such further time as may be granted by the City Council.

5. COMPLETION BY CITY. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to complete the Improvements within the time for completion, CITY, at its option, may enter onto SUBDIVIDER's property to complete the Improvements at SUBDIVIDER's cost.

6. WARRANTY OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS. SUBDIVIDER warrants that the plans and specifications for the Improvements shall conform to the approved tentative map and the specific plan for the Subdivision previously approved by CITY's Planning Commission and the City Council, together with all conditions made a part of such approval(s).

SUBDIVIDER further warrants that the plans and specifications can be relied upon to accomplish the improvement work covered by this Agreement in a good, workmanlike manner and in accordance with accepted construction practices. Should the plans and specifications at any time before final acceptance of the Improvements prove to be inadequate in any respect, SUBDIVIDER agrees to make such changes deemed necessary by CITY to accomplish improvement work in a good, workmanlike manner and in accordance with accepted construction practices. SUBDIVIDER further agrees to make or cause to be made such engineering, soils and other reports as may be required by CITY.

7. CITY NOT LIABLE FOR PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CITY is not an insurer or surety for the design or construction of the Subdivision. And CITY, its officers, officials, employees, agents, representatives, and certified volunteers are not liable or responsible for any claim arising during construction of the Subdivision or Improvements, unless it can be shown that such person specifically directed that the Subdivision or Improvement be accomplished in a manner contrary to the wishes and desires of SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDIVIDER filed a written objection with the City Engineer before commencing such work or Improvement.

8. WARRANTY OF WORK. SUBDIVIDER warrants that the Improvements will be constructed in conformance with the plans and specifications, CITY standards, and the highest industry standards. Should any Improvement fail to comply with this warranty or 448
DOC #2022000065339 Page 3 of 27
any other provision of this Agreement within one (1) year after CITY's final acceptance, SUBDIVIDER shall, without delay and without cost to CITY, repair, replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the Improvements. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement or should the exigencies of the case require repairs or replacements to be made before SUBDIVIDER can be notified, CITY will, at its option, make the necessary repairs, replacements, or reconstruction, as determined by CITY. SUBDIVIDER shall pay to CITY the actual cost of such repairs, replacements, or reconstruction plus CITY's administrative costs. This section is not a waiver of any other right CITY may have for correcting faulty workmanship or defective materials.

9. REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS. SUBDIVIDER shall repair or replace, as determined by CITY, Improvements and monuments destroyed or damaged by SUBDIVIDER's actions and to repair or replace, as determined by CITY, any property damaged or destroyed by SUBDIVIDER. Any such repair or replacement shall be completed to CITY's satisfaction and approval, and at no cost to CITY.

10. CITY'S RIGHT OF ENTRY. SUBDIVIDER grants CITY right of entry to SUBDIV1DER's property to inspect the Improvements constructed by SUBDIVIDER and to ensure compliance with this Agreement.

11. CONTRACT SECURITY.

A. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, SUBDIVIDER shall furnish:
i. A surety bond in an amount equal to at least one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of improvements as security for the faithful performance of this Agreement;
ii. A surety bond in an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the estimated cost of the grading activities as security for the faithful performance of the grading activities;
iii. A separate surety bond in an amount equal to at least one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said improvements as security for the payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing materials in connection with this Agreement.

B. SUBDIVIDER agrees that the form of the bonds provided by CITY are substantially similar to Government Code §§ 66499.1 and 66499.2.

C. The surety bonds shall be paid and in effect for one year after CITY's final acceptance of the Improvements in accordance with the warranty required by Section 8.
449
DOC #2022000065339 Page 4 of 27

12. MAINTENANCE BONDS. The bonds referred to in Section 11 will not be released until a surety bond guaranteeing the warranty requirements of Section 8 in the amount of at least ten percent (10%) of the sum shown in Section 3 is filed with CITY. The maintenance bond will be released one (1) year from the date of final acceptance of the Improvements.

13. PERFORMANCE BY CITY OR SURETY.

A. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to construct the improvements in the manner and at such locations as specified within the time requirements of this Agreement, or if SUBDIVIDER is not carrying out the intent of this Agreement, CITY may serve written notice upon SUBDIVIDER and the surety on SUBDIVIDER's faithful performance bond demanding satisfactory compliance with this Agreement.

B. Should CITY serve such written notice, CITY may do any one, or combination of, the following:
i. Serve written notice upon the surety on its faithful performance bond demanding satisfactory compliance with this Agreement. In such event the surety must, within five (5) days, assume control and construct the Improvements as SUBDIVIDER's successor,
ii. CITY may construct the improvements itself, or by contract, at SUBDIVIDER's expense on a time a materials basis. In such event, CITY may take possession of and utilize in completing improvement construction, materials, appliances, and other property belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work without liability to CITY. SUBDIVIDER's surety will be liable to CITY for any excess cost of damages incurred by CITY.

C. Nothing in this section waives, or serves as a limitation upon, any additional remedy CITY may have under this Agreement or applicable law.

14.SURETY BOND TO INCLUDE LETTER OF CREDIT. The term "surety bond" also includes such other acceptable security, such as letters of credit or cash deposit agreements issued by responsible financial institutions, which are approved by the City Attorney. The term "surety" includes the issuer of any letter of credit or cash deposit agreement, which is acceptable to CITY as security for the performance of this Agreement. Sureties must be admitted to do business in the State of California.

15. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. SUBDIVIDER agrees to use best management practices ("BMPs"), as that term is defined under applicable law including, without limitation, the Santa Paula Municipal Code, in constructing the improvements anticipated by this Agreement SUBDIVIDER's failure to comply with the terms of this Section constitutes a material breach of this Agreement.
450
DOC #2022000065339 Page 5 of 27

16.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports specific to the improvements identified herein prepared by SUBDIVIDER under this Agreement are CITY's property. SUBDIVIDER may retain copies of said documents and materials as desired, but must deliver all original materials to CITY upon CITY's written notice.

17. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and SUBDIVIDER agree that SUBDIVIDER will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which it is performed. SUBDIVIDER will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. SUBDIVIDER is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct SUBDIVIDER as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that SUBDIVIDER will follow the direction of CITY as to end results of the work only.

18. CASH CHARGES. SUBDIVIDER must pay to CITY in cash such subdivision fees that are established by ordinance or by the City Council in conferring approval or extension of time to the Subdivision.

19. INDEMNIFICATION.

A. SUBDIVIDER indemnifies and holds CITY harmless from and against any claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, attorney's fees), injuries, or liability, arising out ofthis Agreement, or its performance. Should CITY be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of this Agreement, or its performance, SUBDIVIDER must defend CITY (at CITY's request and with counsel satisfactory to CITY) and indemnify CITY for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise.

B. For purposes of this section "CITY" includes CITY's officers, officials, employees, agents, representatives, and certified volunteers.

C. The Parties agree that this section will remain in full force and effect until the Improvements have been formally accepted by CITY.

D. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by SUBDIVIDER, and any approval of such insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by SUBIDIVIDER pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification.
451
DOC #2022000065339 Page 6 of 27

20. INSURANCE.

A. Before commencing performance under this Agreement, and at all other times this Agreement is effective, SUBDIVIDER must procure and maintain the following types of insurance with coverage limits complying, at a minimum, with the limits set forth below:

Type of Insurance Limits (combined single)
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 Occurrence
(Bodily Injury, Personal Injury, and
Property Damage)
Commercial Automobile Liability $2,000,000 Per Accident (Any Auto Hired and Non-Owned
Liability)
Worker's Compensation Statutory
Employers Liability (Bodily Injury by $1,000,000 Each Accident Accident)
Pollution Liability $2,000,000 Per Claim, or
occurrence $4,000,000
aggregate
B. Commercial general liability insurance must meet or exceed the requirements of ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. The amount of insurance set forth above will be a combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage for the policy coverage.

Liability policies must be endorsed to name CITY, its officials, and employees as "additional insureds" under said insurance coverage and to state that such insurance will be deemed "primary" such that any other insurance that may be carried by CITY will be excess thereto. Such endorsement must be reflected on ISO Form No. CG 20 10 11 85 or 88.

Such insurance will be on an "occurrence," not a "claims made," basis and will not be cancelable or subject to reduction except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY.

C. SUBDIVIDER must furnish to CITY duly authenticated Certificates of Insurance evidencing maintenance of the insurance required under this Agreement and such other evidence of insurance or copies of policies as may be reasonably required by CITY from time to time. Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best Company Rating equivalent to at least a Rating of "A:V(1." Certificate(s) must reflect that the insurer will provide thirty (30) day notice of any cancellation of coverage. SUBDIVIDER 452
DOC #2022000065339 Page 7 of 27
will require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions.

21. NOTICES.

A. All notices given or required to be given pursuant to this Agreement will be in writing and may be given by personal delivery or by mail. Notice sent by mail will be addressed as follows:

If to the City
City of Santa Paula
Public Works Department
Attn: Clete J. Saunier, P.E., Public Works Director
P.O. Box 569
Santa Paula, CA 93061-0569
If to the Subdivider
Limoneira Lewis Community Builders LLC
c/o Lewis Management Corporation
Attn: David Lauletta
133 N. 10th Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
B. When addressed in accordance with this paragraph, notices will be deemed given upon deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery.

C. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph.

22. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. SUBDIVIDER will comply with all laws applicable to this Agreement including, without limitation, federal, state, and local laws requiring permitting and licenses. All such compliance will be at SUBDIVIDER's own cost.

23. CONSTRUCTION. The language of each part of this Agreement will be construed simply and according to its fair meaning, and this Agreement will never be construed either for or against either party.

24. SEVERABLE. If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion will be deemed modified to the extent necessary in the opinion of the court to render such portion enforceable and, as so modified, such portion and the balance of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect.
453
DOC #2022000065339 Page 8 of 27

25. CAPTIONS. The captions of the paragraphs of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.

26. WAIVER. Waiver of any provision of this Agreement will not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor will such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.

27. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement has been made in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and exclusive venue for any action involving this Agreement will be in the County of Ventura.

28.AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. This Agreement is subject to arid conditioned upon approval and ratification by the Santa Paula City Council. This Agreement is not binding upon CITY until executed by the City Manager. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written agreement. C1TY's City Manager may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY.

29. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS. The terms of this Agreement constitute a burden and benefit upon the Property. Accordingly, this Agreement will be recorded and the term will run with the Property and become binding upon SUBDIV1DER's heirs, successors and assigns.

30. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the sole agreement between SUBDIVIDER and CITY respecting the maintenance of the Property's common areas and correctly sets forth the obligations of SUBDIVIDER and MY There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written. 454
DOC #2022000065339 Page 9 of 27
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF SANTA PAULA,
a municipal corporation.

ATTEST:

Juli
Ci
Latshaw,
lerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
a2c
Daniel

Singer,
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(4e' JQhn C. Cotti,
City Attorney

LIMONERA LEWIS COMMUNITY

BUILDERS, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company.
ifit—A4,Jr David Lauletta,
Authorized Agent
455
DOC #2022000065339 Page 10 of 27
CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity ofthe individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of Ve ohu,
On Mel Pc-Arl 10 20.11- before me, 4(eg M6Ca 1411, (-Oaf RA, hieC Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
— personally appeared IA
Name(s) of
OAAle.-1401
Signer(s)

who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacIty(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the Instrument.

ALEX MCCARTY
Notary Public • California
Ventura County Commission # 2339168
My Comm. Expires Jan 1, 2025
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the
laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

OPTIONAL
S gnature ofNotary Public
Completing this Information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document 5 vi st'co rmiorove 41-e'd eoeil /- Document Date: Number of Pages: 3
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Dosii Si'4j p
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name: Signer's Name:
0 Corporate Office e(s):
o Partner 0 Limited 0 General 0 Partne Imited U General O Individual 0 Attorney in Fact idual 0 Attorney In Fact o Trustee 0 Guardian orçgnservt6i 0 Trustee U Guardian or Conservator o
Signer
Other:
is

Repres
0 Other:
0 Corporate Officer - Title(s).

Signer is Representing:
©2018 National Notary Association
456
DOC #2022000065339 Page 11 of 27
CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189
1,1 •
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity ofthe Individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of \I e.).11- LAVA
On of&tt. 7 , a.e) a.

Date
personally appeared
1 before me,Z.U.t.t.C. X. LAMS*4 tft vslionoay 1'%tL1L., Here insert Name and rItie of the Officer
ZkLy CAO.Sfit4)%4 it Name(s) ofSigner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same In his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the Instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the Instrument.

JUUE A. LATSHAW
Notary Public • California- 2,
Ventura County Commission #2243215 " My Comm. Expires May 19, 2022 Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the
laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

OPTIONAL
Signature ofNotary Public
Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document Description of Attached Document
Title
Document
or Type
Date:
of Document
Number of Pages:

Signer(s)
Capacity(ies)
Signer's Name:

Other
Claimed

Than Named
by Signer(s)
Above:
o Corporate Officer — Title(s):
in Partner Limited 0 General
O individual 0 Attorney In Fact
O Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator
Signer
Other:
is

Representing:

Signer's
0 Corporate
Name:

Officer

— Title(s).

O Partner — 0 Limited 0 General
O Individual 0 Attorney in Fact
O Trustee CI Guardian or Conservator
0 Signer
Other:
is

Representing:
*......... .. .
©2018 National Notary Association
457
DOC #2022000065339 Page 12 of 27

EXHIBIT A
458
DOC #2022000065339 Page 13 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)

SUMMARY SHEET'
Instructions: User Input Required
ITEM
Street/General Improvements
Removal and Adjustments
Drainage Improvements
Potable Water Improvements
Reclaimed Water Improvements
Sewer Improvements
Monuments
Misc. Water & Sewer Improv.

Grading
Cost Estimate Prepared By:

Signature - Developer's !neer
Cost Estimate Approved :
(Total from Sheet 3)
(Total from Sheet 4)
(Total from Sheet 6)
(Total from Sheet 8)
(Total from Sheet 13)
(Total from Sheet 10)
(Total from Sheet 11)
(Total from Sheet 14)
Total City of Santa Paula
Improvements
(Total from Sheet 9)
Total City of Santa Paula
Grading
2-23-2022
Date
Signature - Cit entative V,1/403z
Date
Sheet 1 of 15
AMOUNT
77,874.65
26,749.80

0.00 424,484.36

0.00 466,606.76

0.00 0.00
995,715.57

0.00 0.00
Engineer's Seal
(include R.C.E It and expiration date)
459
DOC #2022000065339 Page 14 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
-
Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) Jnit Cost ($, item Cost
: Street/General Improvements . • _ . - . . _
1 Finish Grade & Prime Coat ,.. ,..._,.. '--0 SF NA 0.25 0.00 2 Finish Aggreg. Sub Base ($.15/in) .;'._;-',:1,'-':-•10 SF „I :-' 0-, .„ 0.00 0.00 3 Finish Aggreg. Rock Base ($.20/in) ..'' ' =._. 17,. 7 SF " -12::-.4- ,

2.40 424.80
4 Finish Asphalt Concrete ($.48/in) s'_::-..::,k 4-77 SF -' L:"4-1' C 1.92 , 339.84 5 Fog Seal Coat .
-, 3, s•.-..._0 SF NA 0.25 0.00
6 Cross Gutter & Apron 7" Thick :',..:.2, low SF NA 16.00 16,160.00 7 ,
Concrete Sidewalk 4" Thick s ,::,,14).6 SF NA 14.00 19,740.00 8 Conc. Driveway Reside. (6" Thick [*Min]
= $15/SF, + $.28/SF for ea. add. inch of thick)
,';'''-.. ..„.,-
t.'''.:' ., SF ,..c,
. , 6,‘..:,' 15.00 0.00
Conc. Driveway Commercial (6" Thick [*Min]
= $15/SF, + $.28/SF for ea. add. inch of thick)
' ,'.‘.'-', '-‘,:; ,i:- 9 „ : .F,-,- :,
SF .,-,,'".
- - 8 `.,..:
1 15.56 0.00
10 Stamped Concrete (add 1")
.
,', ,_ .1., -
- 0 SF NA 0.00
11 Concrete Curb & Gutter, Type A-2
...
. '-
t,-...: ::' 171- LF NA 37.50 6,412.50
12 Air Blown Mortar 3" Thick ,,,:- '..:`:, *,- ,,0 SF NA 7.00 0.00 13 Concrete Curb Only .4 '.•
• ._0 LF NA 31.00 0.00
14 Concrete Curb & Gutter, Roiled - , t.._' , - ' '6 LF NA ., 44.50 0.00 15 Asphalt Concrete Berm - -,. . - IF NA 9.00 0.00
16 Concrete Cutoff Berm •3 , -
. ,_ .. .. LF NA 15.00 0.00
17 , Barricades .; --:._0 IF NA 63.50 0.00
18 Street Name Signs 1 EA NA 360.00 , 360.00
19 Traffic Signs 0-; t', '-''''41 EA NA 310.00 310.00
20 Block Garden Wall 6' ..., - --, 0 LF NA 97.00 0.00
21 Chain-Link Fence •::. i..,C-„0 IF NA 25.00 0.00
22 Redwood Header 1-,-. ';.:.-,-: ..0 LF . NA 6.00 0.00 23 Reflective Pavement Markers Types D & G -0, EA
,
NA 10.00 0.00
24 ,I..Y\-,•,',.;
Pavement Markers Types A & AY .
•0 EA NA 7.00 0.00
25 Street Lighting (Standard in place)
Residential (includes Trenching)
' -,-;• ' - , •., ;'''...-'0 ' ."-h,_',
EA
,
NA 2,800.00 0.00 „ ,
26 ,
Street Lighting (Standard in place)
Commercial & Industr. (Includes Trenching)
.::::''' '0
:. ,,xcEA NA
,
3,300.00 0.00
27 Traffic Striping - Double Solid ,....., '''';',. -•: -0- , IF NA 3.50 0.00 _
28 Traffic Striping - Single Solid r',.: .; .4: 0 LF NA , 2.00 0.00 , 29 Traffic Striping - Single Skip -- -.' 0 IF NA 2.00 0.00 - 30 Traffic Striping- Letters/Arrows ' ,,c‘,..,1_'...-,0 EA NA 19.50 0.00 31 Parking Lot Striping: Parking Space ., 0 EA NA 6.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL ($) 43,747.14
continued on Sheet 3
Sheet 2 of 15
460
DOC #2022000065339 Page 15 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) _
Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) .. Unit Cost ($) item Cost Stivet/Geniral Improvements Cont. • , ' •, . . s. , ...4 -, • 32 Parking Lot Striping: Handicap Space ,.:1,,.:•,fi,--1,;'9 EA NA 52.00 0.00 33 Handicap Ramps e:t''''i-2.- . . ot..,•.!.. ''''.':'i'2 EA NA 3,800.00 7,600.00 34 Sawcutting ;-1,i,...-316 LF NA 3.00 948.00
35 Undergrounding of Exist. Overhead Utilities --;-.-,,... - • '',..;:-,..,1,-,e,0 IF NA 460.00 0.00 36 Slope Protection - Permanent -S, „:,...1:j.,,c--,•_1() SF NA 1.50 0.00 37 Erosion Control Temporary ;,-,-,-.. ., ,o IS NA `,:K.;;',..-:-•,;-:‘,',:', 0.00 . 38 ,
Temp. Storm Water Pollution Cont.Measures ..:!;;;',...! -1. IS NA ::,16-,06090.-.' 10,000.00 39 Non-Struct. Best Management Practices •,--..:7.0 IS NA ;;.':-..`-',..3;'.: 0.00 40 Construction Traffic Control ',.'„1-'„ /,,.1 IS NA l',.8,590.00'; 8,500.00 41 Aggregate Slurry Seal ';:',1,:e--".:‘: :0 SY NA 3.00 0.00 42 Street Numbers Painted on Curbs -i;•:•;"•";.., ii) EA NA 22.50 0.00 I....,
•
,.;,-, •. -:::.. -.;2,,,, .,:t. 4 ,•,. „_ , • , t ,,i.„:,....k...:,: : , . ) '„•,, ' Z. _ , 'I .s., .... (. 1 : I eli .: 1. fit••;•:$ , r s,,-,,,, - 1.... •'• 4. .1 • ' ,- *
,, 4.•N. ,,i,
ri 1/47 Z •
, : s ,,, ,.. .
. " .1 • • “
, •,•,..,‘,....t.,..,• ri...,•,:
''' .• , ,I •:‘;'•.' _tk 0.00
:;-' 1-•.,-.,' t., _,'•-‘: i'...•..-,:4 .-.7,...,•:-1.-•,..„ '-...,-.a.. .1.-•• -•• - - . ._„.... , , c .-. -:,... _•••,...,-„.• ...[...L.... :,...- , 000 z.. r •-• •- ..:-•••,..; •.,,,,„,- ;,.,,:t.:.. , .. .:„ • •-•;„ ,•: Yr _.., •, ..1‘,4 ,:J • ;. • ;••A; !•)81; • 'r..' . ': jo V't.‘,Z, f•; •)!I r•e ..„, ti'11... S'!•',.,
,, .. , ...1.7 : .$p. ..•
,_.. • . . • ,
''. C t • •••S• ....:,Z
.,,,,,,, , .1 . •
••,„: ih: ' . ..f' ,7 0.00
''4,.." -•:-:::':..r. ‘-t:-.--4: '21.,''3-;-:;..'','"•11:!.....z;-;-.:•.:;‘:':-.."Fi*Z`4?' '`&.'.:' '";--.•`;‘..4.fc.':1` '-',"-i.fi ''":,2-, ..i ; . -,'''',..r[..?-.I.:".•;17.,?- 000 •,'-'.:-r.NT:, -....... ' bktV:i.".-`,1,::-..e. ,;',!...:,.. ; ; .,-;-:.-'.1,;-•''').5.‘1 ...;il.,4:: - .trs:C.'''.; N'Ys.:. -, - - .4.-':'",: .••,' " ,:-.4t • .i '.:'. ' . 0, - = . • r.r.e •7!.,.-1-. if ., 0.00 . ••., -.-- •:.•• .- : -, ...., .1,-0 •.i-...e--,---- .•••• ., -4.•:,t••••, •,,-., •- .. -.....f -;••';'. -:. -':•9"..', •4-4 -r, • --. ,.. :'%-i..11, ;,-...: .1-' 1',-1, i.'-'..- s:,- , ...4 - • ''t ' . - -, - .1....t., , .- -.-,•-•-, ' ....t-••••• q - ...-•-•,..,:; - -;--,.. 1 3.• . • • I:, ' r:g

0.00 3.,.:;....;;; •':-.„!'•,,',. ft•,,-.‘44.:,..*-:•'' ,:,:?.`,•:2• `-.•5,.'-is';e,i_51, :".:',?.--,::,-;7;,..k; , ;;-;-;--:. • 0.00 •-...- "..Q. i %-.i. ,....., bpl.,...5. :r....).., ...•..-, •,-,. ,,. •.,•._-‘•• „7,-,„-,•1,7;,- , .c..?., .;',•'-.. ...•&-...:': k--:... --i.:..h.):6••.......•-•'-,..‘;..1.ct;‘',,,...-0:;.• ..-- ,-,-; -,-,,, •,:,1,.: •,„ tr...t. ..'"1.,..,,..- ,.:„ r>.-`. .,- ...".,- 4... 4 0.00 ),
.,..-._• -.•-,,,,r,r ..,,,..q.-.. - - ,,-&-:.-$. .... „. %,..-,:. ; , • %.__.... ‘-_•••,,k„ •;ii-A2.-,;..., ",--,....• ....1:2,-..- v. ••4..;:::, ..1-, -: •i: :'.....••.....,:, i.-, . - : ......... ',..-c•I• \. ,.,-;:,?-• • -.. P._-• -...4 r.i.., ,•„- •,.:-,- ..:: _4; ,kt:'. ,-.1 ?, 0.00 1-..;:. .; -..--,_;:.;,•.•,; kt„,. \'..,•:.% :' •:,,,,.....; ;'• i'. . I. . •,,,t,':,,t„•.% •., A ;,:s.,:-.„-:i '...1) L....4-4.' .. •'.i 1".:::•-r•-.." ,s-...: .. -•, .:.' ..t:',•,,. '- r,-,0;--,,,,,,....,--.,•.,,:, . ;,.••.‘,.•., .,2,*; t, 44 I. •.. t,...v -,...,, • , ,....., ; • .,_} ,..:-,..,.---....,:.;, t „ ..,` ••• ...,-. 000_ -'s
.. : '''' ':3' ' r`, • q ;4--, ';--!v-..f.....):.1.:'-'2:- ' - ki`z.,.., ........;• , •t; -,•••:".-•• •'.•;y....., ':',"•.'f.-...1-. ..,1.--...', • •',,*1•• • .s;•• , .V.•':".!.1,-,•.- .. • • , ,f.:... r':' ,1,..., s•z-., -.:,....‘ sq'.:.., -- .s....,:-: . •e,-.....--. . 0.00 '3''''•;?..••••!'.;;;'*•I -:-.::-J''''s.,..•,•':: •;4.'-....1:ts•`.5-':.::.1:''''` ,..:`1'-:;":*:1;•#.1.' ...).'il.•'1-]; .•f;-:',"..i..''. 4-i.,1..: ,'-1 0.00 ,4 .7;-'_".-*:, ..-....''. '.k4:'•1::•;.,".::•• i•:.!•?*":-..--.',N.--..... 1s '.Z7::e ki.: .4' ' C,:: "...i, ‘a " .`: .. •;i' i:'. : 1 c'..- :::-: ::'. • 0.00 -.‘"."'''''..;:.:‘'`?":'1,..7:.'.''';,--•‘'..,;....'.‘'......s,?.:,--;',-,7:‘1 ::i.::::::::%•-•'. :c.:.:.'.1.--- 1.-:,..;:, '-''..' !...1-,!; ,,.-1`.,*_, :". i 0.00 • - -v.; ).. , .4.pe,.. --;••,..;.,.; -:;4.4„.:•,,...'-_,,,t •' :(.41,‘, ....r--; - ;,..,s,I . 4,4... -4.-„,..--..!..-- 000.00 4,1i.:::,..'../,' '?..t..---. 2,-,-:.:.--,i,Y,47.;.:°•:':;,-.,' '1 -:-.1,-...1',(14:-i::: •.::::. 'i: Y:--Z5-= ..':'%'‘:'-,:),i',0.00 ,,.-'_:,- .:.-,„; ......i:••,••••,:,,_'--';'',•,:,:i,' ',1,',1..-,:,.,:cts.,-,;.=,:i:-..,•:4, -ti;i•As,:f.;.' 1;,:•2,-:•>,1•.;54..:.,: ..'5:-..c?,:.',.::., ,....:s_....*;; '•:".PI:s:,)i ,...-;• 0.00 :-..,-...-. f,;;-:,.,..-,•,.. '•-:,. -; -...,%:•-,..,,w.-,::•-- 't •,',K.•,,," ic.'1' •11--•,---: '.!= -,.'-41/4' -,.`•d, ' -k• '. ""•:•:•m:f-k '4-, 7 ot•-4 , r_1 •fIL-,4 ,..- c•„:••14--7' -. ::' ‘,i',.,', ., --- • - • , «f3`. -.... 'I" •-.7 -- ---,-N 47 •;. i--.....-..,.,, 0.00 I &:.1---.--;;,-.--'..'.;:?,..,:i.';':!..'sc,.. •-•;--11..1,.;:.'•: &'.4'........-,..'...,•-; 0.00 - ' ...... .--• --•:9 7':.- , e; ;- •.---, '-'..•.,..";%•-• -'•--'-, ••,, i, •.-. r,' ---,. --7---:-7•-, - 44,- '..,".....":..-".,. '''' .."'.1`";•;::. .'' :I ,..", '-•,-•,;;::.,-,-- ' ....i t•:" ". I-s,'.- ..4z,_-,.„.: .,..-„r f ItCrg ,... -;.• ''. ;,,,, -....•..:-••-:...-.. . 0.00 ' •'
, -' ,sr,.:4:') .A ..." ,s.,..= •'-.1.:-.;r r '''''.
.• : t -.', •'4-7-. '.•:-.:-.-:.,"0..v.,...0,4,- .:.--- ,.....r,......‘ ., .,,.: ' ; ' . ' 7:-.: ... •,......:•-,..- , 1•4 •'-' ''' -•,,%., ,` . , ,1 • ZI,: - ; r`.:- „- /-)4', `,'.> ',::'-',--,P.' _.,• .4. . ... .... 0.00 SUBTOTAL ($) (SHEET 3) 27,048.00
- ' -
TOTAL (SHEETS 2 & 3)
- -- -
70,795.14
ADD 10% 7,079.51
-
TOTAL 77,874.65
Sheet 3 of 15
461
DOC #2022000065339 Page 16 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit '
_
Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
.Removal and Adjustments " -. . .
'
•.'''',' '-',\:- _ , ..
1 Concrete rz.sy:,---4,71-,-,0Cy NA 112.00 0.00
2 Asphalt cj;:_•,.,; .„ftN SF NA 5.00 400.00
3 Concrete Sidewalk, Driveway,
Cross Gutter, Spandrel
*;-,,Z,-.._-"t"-.._ • ,,-g„.-:?•,1460
'4•,:..4.- ::

SF
'
NA 12.00
.
17,520.00
4 Curb Only '''.•''-'0 '' LF NA 9.00 0.00
- 5 Curb and Gutter ... .._„- I '>'.'•':•146 LF NA 13.00 1,898.00 6 Storm Drain Pipe 15" - 42" i*-', . ..'-r.: ... .„ 0 1F _, , NA 9.00
'

0.00 7 Storm Drain Pipe 42" ' ''''.•_•:1'..„-0 LF NA 18.00 _0.00 8 Storm Drain Plug 6 EA NA ;.,`..,-:2`,.6:, ‘i:;,:;' 0.00 9 Adjust Survey Monument to Grade ,-i, ',-.,',1..-; 0 EA NA 500.00 0.00 10 Adjust Manhole to Grade ,
"3%.,Z‘z::-....,Ci ' EA NA 540.00 0.00
11 ' Adjust Water Valve Box to Grade _ f`'..:•:::-.--..• _ *:9 EA NA 365.00 0.00 - 12 Irrigation Box ,,;::„.,;..;......„,,..=z„..9 EA NA ::.'..:•z•0.00:,' , ' 0.00 13 ' Waterlines ;'¡'" ') 1.''.0 LF NA -:- - --, •-,3. :i 0.002 (-... 0.00 14 Trees -
--.:...1 •..c..•, -: EA NA 2,566:O0.'i, 2,500.00
15 Traffic Striping Removal (single stripe) LF NA 3.00 0.00 .. 16 Traffic Striping Removal (double stripe) r::,...s0 ' -- ,
LF NA 3.50 0.00
17 Remove LS Area and Irrigation .
i'l' ',:-.; :1,:1 Ls NA :'. I0-0k).-öä'',1". 2,000.00
18 Remove Trees ,2;','.,, -1 EA NA i-..',i,.:4..-: i*: 17 0.00 19 Relocate Signs •,.e.• ;.r.- . ,---:,,.: , •, z'r,•-.0 EA NA .` -..,`,..:-.-;;" ":-• 0.00 20 Adjust Utility Box to Grade EA _ NA '>',.-•>-- ?•-•.; 4-7-2'Z 0.00 21 Abandon Pipe, in Place ‘I'' ••,•,.). -,•''''..--i0 ••.-,,,,..e. LE NA ' 0 ••••'1:•-.,-. 0.00 22 Remove Pipe Y7.Ö LF NA ;;.;'4_, •--j.•:';A:`.. .';, 0.00 23 Abandon Manhole, In Place .-•.••- r..-; ...,-,, ' ‘ 0 EA NA ;,..-:-;!:;`,-;.:',.-7,:t,'•. 0,00 .- , ••'''. '' •-..-t ' .s'.-..-• •.'.• •,-. ; .-.,-ia.....;,,, S. .-h-s» ,-. -..jr':,. ' -:..- -te:.• f;;;-•,- -: `2,7'1: 0.00 , ,, ...."..,,,„3...,,....„, - _ •-,, 2 „ , _.i•J•!.....3, j2,7,- ., - • -_,- • 0.00

0.00 - , t , , ,...,.-
i-•..;.. ..,,.. , - ...-, ....,, •, -, ,,.• , si._. .,.( . -•.. „ tis7'. ,-,.: ....,,, ,_ , ..-,..,- -,» e - :,..... -. v.• • , , . ' ...,e . -",.. , ..• r . - _ . •• ,,e, h , - .... , .,., , e...._.•-. ,:, _ • , - • ,- , • -'-, r 0.00 '• - '..'-'•_-•.. . - ' ;'. •,. ' ,. 'S. 1 --- r• - ; - , • . . e _,'-_,, '- .- • fr ..;,...‘+.g, ....,--- ' .2; .,....e,-, , _, ...4, .-.• ,'",-, .• . . ,. •.: !.;..i .4,.,,: rt• ,..k,--.",-,,, f',1.-±.,. ;••.›,

1. •,_ --', ......, z. •:„-:•.. , :-....-- -, 0.00 , .:,, . ,:. •},:.,„.-.•_•..,..•,.z;,-.2 ._„.,,,,_:‘:-•,•:,z-- :::..,..:f.,',._:--,-, '-,,.;"*_'';'-',;',1•2*-••-',,*,- "--,J.:A,' 2',1:--'-'_;" •••, r.,,-.z.,...- ,_::;.;:"::»' 0.00 '
. -
7,•'. • s,'‘..:1).- ..--.--;.›., :. 4 ',2.P, ; ., ,s,... !,-;•-•.. ,' ,',. ' _. '‘, . ' -. ' . : ,.: - . e.7:-...• '... g .*.,''.:; ,-j-2,•' . s. ,,,,.. 'Y''. .. .;:: - .: v: '. " • ,.. v.., .'i, ', ,, :.:•..--.1,,:_-..: *. ›, z -_:r .-,'„,,,'. ' ,- . ...,. ..7..`;'-t--. ,,,,, • ' .-`_.. , ._,, 0.00 ;..2 ,..',s,j ''' Z .,:-:',!:.' - 'F. !'.'''2":., z :: : . .:-,:.''jt' - :,)-::':.--.`;':3:_'1,,. ''.:_ >.' T:-..'"-'5:-.',4,,, 0.00 , ,- •-',.....1.).-- ---,,..... ' •,•,--,..e,....-:, ..-- •, • .;.• •-•-. . :....,z-: '-•-•:, 7,....,..• •.•..,, "i. . ;:i. ..• -• ,,,,•-, - , -1..:(- .,.. --•.»...--,-, ! . tz,,,; .,,,:.•_•,_,- =..‘ (., --,i'..• • - , •••- _•- .,' ' .." - . -. ,...', 0.00 ,.k..----'•,••; , ,.•1-... .'-:-.-:': L.,!.".,»)..._'-3: '--t-,:..-:-;,, ' . ,. ,.;--.-',, 24,318.00

0.00 SUBTOTAL
ADD 10% 2,431.80
. -
TOTAL ..
- - .
26,749.80
Sheet 4 of 15
462
DOC #2022000065339 Page 17 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Extra (Ft) Unit Cost ($) t Item Cost ,..-.....- ' Drarnäge Improvements , .. .. . .

Storm Drain Pipe (In place, including
earthwork) Round Pipe Cost CMP (CMPA)
1 18" (22" x 13" $6.25/LF extra) •t •,11'CIZ. 03.0 LF NA 70.00 0.00 2 21" (24" x 16" $6.25/LF extra) :1'5: '_''g..)•:.....0 LF NA 85.00 0.00 3 24" (29" x 181' $10.40/LF extra) : -.. s', 'O IF NA 105.00 0.00 4 30" (36" x 22" $14.75/LF extra) .f,s 7.'-'••,,, ::9 LF NA 125.00 0.00 5 36" (43" x 27" $16.90/LF extra) .' .--...i. i;',..:.7"::-.':', -0 LF NA 145.00 0.00 6 42" (50" x 30" $20.70/LF extra) :
,•'-='•-•;• • _,, , -
•-
"0 LF NA 170,00 0.00
7 48" (58" x 36" $27.50/LF extra) '..:, ',e r ,0 LF NA 190.00 0.00 8 60" (72" x 44" $31.00/LF extra) :, ;,,,,•:,-,.r,:_ 0 is NA 245,00 0.00 9 72" (83" x 57" $35.00/LF extra) ,, '„:.._3::::«,:,..,''.0 LF NA 330.00 0.00 Reinforced Concrete Pipe
(RCP)
10 18" (22" x 13" $6.25/LF extra) 112::';'•.','.',;':0 . t_. IF NA 87.00 0.00 11 21" (24" x 16" $6.25/LF extra)
.
-;,21'i.,'•'..,-,A LF NA 102.00 0.00
12 24" (29" x 18" $10.40/LF extra) ;:.'.;:. :;:).-; •'. LF NA 118.00 0.00 13 30" (36" x 22" $14.75/LF extra) ;,-'•j'''C,: ';,:_tfi IF NA 140.00 0.00 14 36" (43" x 27" $16.90/LF extra) . :: ,=t1,•'''''D ...„. . LF NA 155.00 ' 0.00 15 42" (50" x 30" $20.70/LF extra) ',_IO IF NA 190.00 0.00 16 48" (58" x 36" $27.50/LF extra) ,.. .-• , 7.,•• >21 ,st- 0 LF NA 210.00 0.00 17 60" (72" x 44" $31.00/LF extra) ;I•'>"J,..1,"0 LE NA 260.00 0.00 18 72" (83" x 57" $35.00/LF extra) ..: g':1:,6 LF NA 330.00 0 CIPP ,
19 24" ./ -.• t , •. •;_b• ,,-VO LF NA 65.00 0.00
20, 27" .627/--,:- 1-,0 LE NA 68.00 0.00
21 30" (.•I:•:, ?I-,0 LF NA 74.00 0.00
22 36" 1:+'„,»-,Y,,•' 0 IF NA 88.00 0.00
23 42" - ..- -• 0 IF NA 100.00 0.00
24 48" '.-.:7:1'._'::•2,-..;;',15 IF NA 119.00 0.00
25 54" '4, :':;•:ii..1'0 LF NA 142.00 0.00
26 60" ':':g`,V..Í.:•::': 0 IF NA 176.00 0.00
27 66" t,%.-,•;->-,,,';,,,10 IF NA 189.00 0.00
28' 72" 9`- .,...z. f: ,
' ' 0 LF NA 219.00 0.00
29 84" ;-,,,,.Mi LF NA 270.00 0.00
30 96" ii'.'' ':::-;-,'•;•a I-F NA 340.00 0.00
31 Standard 48" Dla Manhole (precast) ',¡-_-•:',;'0 EA NA 3,100.00 0.00 32 Standard 48" Dia Manhole (CIPP) '';..", ',0 EA NA 4,300.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL ($) 0.00
continued on Sheet 6
Sheet 5 of 15
463
DOC #2022000065339 Page 18 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
Drainage Improvements Cont. . ' . . ,• . - . , .
33 Junction Structures (CIPP) ' . ,';''-l-' ,"..'ci ce NA 2,850.00 0.00 34, Standard Inlet Type OL, L = 10' {.: .2,.': - 0 EA NA 2,950.00 35 Standard Inlet Type GOL, L.=7' "',..\'.,..:1:0 EA NA 3,950.00 0.00 36 Standard Inlet Type GOL, L=10' P.': j.' 0 EA NA 4,700.00 0.00 37 Standard Inlet Type 05,1=3.5' ,.-s.",`.r.,..,:0 EA NA 2,800.00 0.00 38 Standard Inlet Type Gl, G2, G3, G4,
G5, 66 L=3" or less
.. ! '`:--•
- NA 2,800.00 0.00
39 Standard Inlet Type 612, GT4, L=6.5' •'•-•- .`" :0 EA NA 3,950.00 0.00 40 Standard Inlet Type Gil, GT3, L=6.5' l' i t.',- 0 EA NA 3,750.00 0.00 41 Standard Inlet Type GO, L=3.51 . _ ..,,. . :,'...•',! •2-L',-0 EA NA 2,900.00 0.00 42 Standard Inlet Type GDO, L=3.5' .,::.;•'_1;;;;.1,:.: 0 EA NA 3,400.00 0.00 43 Standard Inlet Type SPPWC 300-2, L=3.5' :•-••,..;;C;i7r,...`i.0 EA NA 2,900.00 0.00 44 Standard inlet Type SPPWC 300-2, L=7.0' •7:,1.';4,.•.,()EA NA 4,370.00 0.00 45 Standard Inlet Type SPPWC 300-2, L=14.0' r;i'''..:-q--ji EA NA 7,000.00 0.00 46 Standard Inlet Type SPPWC 301-2,1=7.0' :,'r,?..". f''... '0 EA NA 4,060.00 0.00 47 For ea Foot of inlet length add or subtract, :. t••:': :0 LF NA 405.00 0.00 48 Terrace, Interceptor or Down Drains :,',",,,,,•,;.s.,:;J 0 LF NA 36.00 0.00 49 Class A Reinf Concrete (more than 100 CV) ' ,i';','-"c'1'f-0 NA 870.00 50 Class A Reinf Concrete (less than 100 CV) ..,•,_k,•-::::.-.:1,9 CY NA 960.00 0.00 51 Rip Rap (placed-ungrouted) ":':',..,•J":- .0 NA 170.00 0.00 52 Rip Rap (placed-grouted) ••'"-;-;,---;(j CY NA 205.00 0.00 53 Rip Rap (sacked) ',..'•-s,',,','::._:,•.:'. CY NA 210.00 0.00 54 Structural Best Management Practices ;.7YP.:.:;_lic:',.-.0 LS NA 1,:-••-:.;:.T..::••• .....<.: 0.00 55 Standard 3" Curb Drain 7,"• '`,:s'--0 EA NA :' .,, .':Al ' ‘..,.. 0.00 ...,.! c.. •s,:- ••'‘,„ ;.:. I •!.1 • ,-.. '''.•••:.Lt::::'*:"..: ,•s. '.1';'::•:; !..::---:-.ZI''. :•;.1.! ,--...•:-......1.,..:-.'' 0.00 -:- • ,' , ' :, „'' !;"';i'":7 •
1 ;_. ; -;r1/:.:.... *--- ;'",":.c.;.1, ,.'-' . ; ..-:'„- , ,'" ,,-.,i.• ': ',‘ ...:: : 0.00 ':"_,. ' 0 ' • ' :-•;.•,':',91,..;... - . ' -:... • ' :‘`. '''...'i-:,:-::.;...-? • .....-:' '2_,-.- .. :':;,':,..:,':- -A''' .. 0.00 ? '..i,. ' r. ,.:,:';f:!'''_ •.;!.'j' , ','. ;:s.I.1,..: 7 r",-, -,..-:' ;, f Lc' i•-'', . • i 0.00 t " ' s., :Cr ), v ; . -' ',./V.,- -', ' % ''....,.,4;-...., ' .. ,. , , 0.00 '.%,'; ' .: ,'-','N''•I's-:::‘,.''..-f-,; '' . :' '''' ". '•'.!' . ' ':,";:i`.-i•,:•1-.:. "•.;L: --!..•:: --•- 0.00 ••.1, ••L . IS
•.„- '-' . ' ., 1-.::‘::, -.2...i..c.' -.•-: '2,1.;,•.,_ :„.';;,:1,,rf=-!:!: j," ..:1 • 1, , s .;_-.-r...., - ." 0.00

0.00 r $• :=; - -'' "••••-; • 4';.- ' .7., -,. ' -' ; IF ":.:-, . : - ,t• • '. -- : ;'''4".-, ..- '' -"-:' :-"‘" •';',L;, ;..„3.7.. 1',•,•: ' ":. .., 7_7:.. r-1'' , :-Is.' : , _.'S. .' !:\l' '':-',.•''''. '•M SUBTOTAL (SHEET 6) 0.00
TOTAL (SHEET 5, 6) 0.00
ADD 10% 0.00
TOTAL 0.00
Sheet 6 of 15
464
DOC #2022000065339 Page 19 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Thick. {in) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
Potable Water Improvements . . , , , _ •
1 6" PVC C-900, CL 150 ,...
.
•94:03 .. - IF NA 29.00 2,726.87
2 8" PVC C-900, CL 150 , 3029 LF NA 35.00 106,015.00
3 10" PVC C-900, CL 150 , .,. • • ' 0 LF NA 46.00 0.00
4 12" PVC C-900, CL 150 ' s ''.% 0 LF NA 68.00 0.00
5 6" PVC C-900, CL 200 , ,::. -.- :0 LF NA 33.00 0.00
6 8" PVC C-900, CL 200 '-'•,' rfp IF NA 41.00 0.00
7 10" PVC C-900, CL 200 _ - • , . --•, : 0 LF NA 52.00 0.00 8 12" PVC C-900, CL 200 ' l' f '. .0 LF NA 72.00 0.00
9 14" DIP ,: ,-;::-0 IF NA 73.00 0.00
10 16" DIP -.7--..0 LF NA 82.00 0.00
11 20" DIP 1 'L..' t'.'''..0 IF NA 131.00 0.00
12 6" Tee, In Place '• %.-'-:•,-_,0 EA NA 452.00 0.00
13 8" x 6" Tee, In Place ' '''''-''' 0 EA NA 655.00 0.00 14 8" Tee, In Place , •,_ _ _ ••. , _ 9 EA NA 685.00 6,165.00 15 10" x 6" Tee or 10" x 8" Tee, In Place 4::',' ,0 EA NA 950.00 0.00 16 10" Tee, In Place ;: --:-......I? EA NA 1,015.00 0.00 17 12" Tee, In Place , ..„ ..‘•0 EA NA 1,210.00 0.00
18 16" Tee, In Place i . :_.;-:, p EA NA 3,140.00 0.00
19 16" x 6" Tee or 20" x 8" Tee, In Place '-• '-'1:-0 EA NA 3,140.00 0.00 20 20" Tee, In Place •-. '-' ,, 0 EA NA 3,740.00 0.00
21 20" x 6" Tee or 20" x 8" Tee, In Place ; : ,-;•': ,1 EA NA 4,100.00 4,100.00 22 8" Cross, In Place .,.. .,.._0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
23 10" Cross, In Place ;;•,' :: 1Z;'cl EA NA 1,300.00 0.00 24 12" Cross, In Place , ... ',: 0 EA NA 1,500.00 0.00
25 16" Cross, In Place ' ' ' 0 EA NA 4,100.00 0.00
26 20" Cross, In Place il '" . EA NA 5,500.00 0.00
27 8" x 6" Reducer, In Place ., ... '''1 EA NA 453.00 453.00 28 10" x 8" Reduced, In Place .''.„ :,(::::,,,p EA NA 640.00 0.00 29 12" x 8" or 12" x 10" Reducer, In Place -' ...;,!.. 1 EA NA 890.00 890.00 30 16" x 8" or 16" x 10" Reducer, In Place • .,EA NA 2,370.00 0.00 31 20" x 8" or 20" x 10" Reducer, In Place - :%' : .,0 EA NA 3,500.00 0.00 32 2" Blow-Off, In Place ' .- '-',5 EA NA 1,800.00 9,000.00 33 6" Blow-Off, In Place •''' rp EA NA 4,570.00 0.00
34 Fire Hydrant - Corn plete, In Place , ..--,- : •8 EA NA 4,690.00 37,520.00 35 6" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place ," ..,-''-• •:'0 EA NA 465.00 0.00 36 8" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place -32 EA NA 640.00 20,480.00 37 10" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place , :.p EA NA 780.00 0.00 SU TOTAL ($) 187,349.87
continued on Sheet 8
Sheet 7 of 15
465
DOC #2022000065339 Page 20 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) ESTIMATE OF COST
Project No, LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC
Item •
Quantity Thick. (In) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
Potable Water Improvements Cont.
38 12" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place 0 EA NA 910.00 0.00
39 16" Elbow 90° or 450, In Place EA NA 2,310.00 0.00
40 20" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place ' ''0 EA NA 3,220.00 0.00 41 6" Valve, In Place EA NA 1,040.00 0.00
42 8" Valve, In Place 25 EA NA 1,270.00 31,750.00
43 10" Valve, In Place ;'o EA NA 1,790.00 0.00
44 12" Valve, In Place . '0 EA NA 2,120.00 0.00
45 16" Valve, In Place ".; ,0 EA NA 4,480.00 0.00
46 20" Valve, In Place '; , -2 EA NA 6,420.00 12,840.00 47 1" Air Release . 6 EA NA 2,500.00 15,000.00
48 2" Air Release ; EA NA 3,740.00 0.00
49 12" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place ;4'4- • 0 IF NA 87,00 0.00 50 14" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 87.00 0.00 51 16" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 97.00 0.00 52 20" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place .0 IF NA 145.00 0.00 53 Backflow Prevention Device - Fire Line .6 EA NA 3,900.00 0.00 54 6" Double Detector Check EA NA 11,000.00 0.00
55 8" Double Detector Check 0 EA NA 15,270.00 0.00
56 10" Double Detector Check EA NA 16,900.00 0.00
57 1" RP Backflow Device '-'d EA NA 725.00 0.00
58 1-1/2" RP Backflow Device .0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
59 2" RP Backflow Device -_•!0 EA NA 1,300.00 0.00
60 6" RP Backflow Device EA NA 11,900.00 0.00
61 8" RP Backflow Device :0 EA NA 16,600.00 0.00
62 Slope Anchor Blocks -;0 EA NA 400.00 0.00
63 Slope Erosion Control LS NA 0.00
64 1" Service, Complete 125 EA NA 1,000.00 125,000.00
65 2" Service, Complete •
0 EA NA 2,130.00 0.00
66 3" Service, Complete 0 EA NA 5,300.00 0,00
67 Encasements 0 IF NA 30.00 0.00
68 8" Tapping Sleeve EA NA 2,900.00 0.00
69 10" Tapping Sleeve 0 EA NA 3,200.00 0.00
70 12" Tapping Sleeve EA NA 3,650.00 0.00
71 Elbow 22.5 degree,'in place 1 2-EA NA • 465.00 465.00 72 ' • 8" DIP-_ • - 193 , IF. „ _NA; - '60.00 - 9,650.00 73 .„. Elboiv, 2215 de-gree, in place; EA NA • .:.640.00 • 3,200.00 721 ,8P.,E1I5ow 11,25; degree, in Place EA 'NA 640.00 640.00 SUBTOTAL (SHEET 8) 198,545.00
TOTAL (SHEET 7 & 8) 385,894.87
ADD 10%
TOTAL
Sheet 8 of 15
38,589.49
424,484.36
466
DOC #2022000065339 Page 21 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in),• Unit Cost ($) item Cost • Grading - - • Earthworks
1 Cut (including over-excavation) 1......I, .0 CY NA 4.00 . 0.00 2 Fill (including over-excavation) . • 1.•• 0
• CY NA , , 4.00 0.00
3 Export •- . , I; .:.,. ,CY NA 10.00 0.00
4 Import „•2'..; -.;•' 0 CY NA 10.00 0.00
5 _. Clearing and Grubbing -.:..',•,'•'.i '0 AC r••
NA 2,000.00 ' 0.00 ,
` .-.... .,•.7, -, • " .•.':- -.71.• •,..1". - ‘14 ';. --.',' ' ..0 , ',.. . . - , L: .: ' •• ' 1 ' 0.00 I • ••••- -..., . ... - • . .. •.,. .•:•.-.-:.• ... ..,....••• , . : ..- . • -_, •---.. •.• .,,,, -.. =-- • _ 0.00 • .- :. ...."::.• a-.) (-:. ''.4",..._ ' :-.', ' •.•,.,.:',".,.-. ,1‘,
i.., .,-,.'.',,; , ::- "..r: . .•.., . ..• , . . .. 0.00 ,. • .. . •--9,,,i':. . ;,:-• •.., '."''i ::: - : - *-ee'a,•..,•=-!•)' •- • -, ...•.... :.... 4.. -- • . . ,, .-, ....--- ...-s- Id *.• " „....,•,‘• .. • -ffi: . it.%' , ' , •-:4- - %..%!' :. ''' A4 . . A. 0.00 r • e, -„. T •' • ..A .... 1 ..., ....•.1 ';.'s';' • #. .....; . ... i,1 ,,Ci% .1. .. •.....•.•.,t •..,- --_,..Is! t . J -Y.. . 1 . j. .. . ..• . ..,. e.. Vtio" •
if ' C.,•S t• e, ' . . .,'• • ..., ,4• • l'' .. ..".•:.,. - - , ..„‘" . . :. , 'S 4 • ' 0.00
" r
aoo
•- , - •• •-;. =. .• - 000
' -- • • -, .•.• 1.'*.2.-•:--., -. Li••4.; .2.".--2. 1;.-'••;"'....,• ...•;,• ' tt*:: •, .• ., ,.,_ • -N _.,. -, 0.00 1, .:T
• . ":41. t.,'- •, .• ,.... , .-- -• • , -,.., ,.•.• 1 ''.•-•::. i 1:..., ....,, `. „ .. „' ; ‘;,V.,.., .-: -2. • L' :, , : ii. .:.. .,... ...,. - = :.• : .1:.•,. _ 4 ‘i - .,r. ..1, . , .-, -•:.i.• .• •:...'' ' . 4. •}•• ' ? • 1 •'•"" .4 s, . ',',..,;•;•,•_, 0.00
;.•••'. .., • '.: Zri."'.3".1•••••••:. .., •?' •:;•::.., - f V,..i.1-1••••.. ..." ' L'.• `..-..'• s.' . " ••••P Is . 7 i ' " • , ' ..' 4.: •T'i 1 XI 0.00 . , ,i,•.: •01. • - ' ' ''t ' . ' 1....e, ,. ' I <-•:"`" ' 1 A, ' ,. , ,•• , tr/ , : . - , : s.,"'„: , ' ." -- t 0.00 I
•-•_,`'.: ; •„":',-:-:,•:-..",,• • •1;,.., -,-...-t- - ; ' . .,".' : --.._ -...'., '-•"..1. '"," '-. ;.':- •'‘ k,...-: : -•-• V:- -..•_.,.-- 0.00 - ,.," ,•,:• :• .--.. - .•••f • .,Nc•.:'_;::1',,',, • ';' "-' : I:, . .::.... 2:- t'• ll''-' . 1::"...--:..‘ " i 1' • ' •• • , • : 1.:, '. ....s.... 0.00 1 , ; • •,,_',L94 1,--„ ::',.,:t,, .:7 ...L., ' „„,, , y-4 :•,- , Y ,. , 7 .;',,„ -,- . . 4 :,,..• •!„.„... , r.....,1.11,,.•,;.:,..... -4.i .t.i4 ,.. •• %,:s. 4. -'' .'a. 1-,...., -.:-,•. ' ;r k4 ,'' • 4 ' .• , . .. ("". € i '. •4 . 0.00
I:4: ; ;. ..; ‘,€ .' :,..:;•:::,'ei,s.''... 1,4:i-li N-Ii:0-: ' ':,'1 A; ..,41.. -"Y. 't, .:11 fr-,..
. .:•. ---;.. ''.....:' 32'''•;fi'H' aoo
:, ,- ....,.,,t.....,, _,.,.,. • . . • „•,. -..,.......,- S. •'•- •- --• - .•• 'S _.• • •-• o.00 000
I.- ' .. .•. • -..., • .,-; ". , : .. .•,--:„.•-..: • ..- ....,.,. . •-. ;•••' ,•„,-.1,..•• ...v‘•••:-:';'. q,--•--- 9; -.:•,,.: 000 I : .., _., .••s•. •-••.-= -.••,,••- ,:: , ----: ••••., ••---- ; :.,. •-....-.....: , -• ...:,•.-.,,,:,•• •,.i. -is-•,.•••••::,..:••:. . L.;•••::•4 - , 9•••.- •., .- : •; ,•.•...-•, • :•• -..-•,,..•-,. : - •••- --.. .•....,. 'Is 000 Ii •..,-).,,,„t :..'-'1".•-, ..:•-'14..1.7-e:t'f: ..;•,' '':.: ;...:.*;' ---'=.- ,` :.`f!47::*..-. 1.:‘..-j, 1-:',', k";:i 11... `i• :',<. ii,..•1:.:- :,.?'..:. ,;:, 0.00 . , .:.- -•• :, ....:1• '...•-•..- , -,-- •••••.', •. s.;e',.....- --•..- . •.• ' • '-' 1:. 4: - •••'‘... ' " •, : •-• . ,..7- ' 0.00

1....e. ' '. '..!.*:••.:',:'-.s....(-.. ...C. s ..' 1:.'•.!.; _-,.;.•_..s.:. - ,;:•:-.!. _ .... - - sq'-- 0.00 „.7 ' '' • t' --t • ' '''` . '. ' ".-- ' , ,', • , .‘ ' -. -`,.. " " .4 , - r.,:, -^•;., e- 4 '', 9, ....' • , ' , • 0.00 I[)-..- 1i.•:'!..1A,?..,'2.' ,.: ,• •..•".....•• ...zr.,•-i,-....t.'': ':::-.1. 1" '-';-i.`,- .2.' ..: •- ,•':o. `.... -;,•-.'--.• .-...,..r -...t .1''' -:.', 0.00 \ ,,,-, e,.: . ',- .; •-.,Ny.. :-,?, , .;.• - ;.%,,---,t: • ', ,,‘. : „s . ,-....1;,:, ,...:.),:-N,,,,, ."1:„;':......:, ',, . ': _',. f; :.. , „1 r. . e, . ., •" s ", . r,- ,,,i, • ....1 • • . ...,..-. ---- , -s •'..': f .t• i. 0.' - P. • .../ ,:, ‘,....'".ii „, ••,---ts .. .05 4 i ...1: ....• `. 0.00 I'‘' .• . r '• aic....0...:'s . ; :: ! • •:. i t•••1 .ys:',, •:.9..... ,. . '5 Si .• . .•.•• si ?s,, t : l is.;,, ,i-.1•1.'!,: ..7...is • _:-..t. 0.00

0.00 I-;' • " ''. , . !,.„,, „ ,. _ ..• .• .• -• -2,. ;• -, , - - ., -; :- ,- ._,.....,, t.. -. ...... ,.. . , .• , . . .., - •'t. 0.00 l'. , r'.: ,•,'..... .- •;•;::'-..'1:,',.-..-‘-.„'- - ' ."J:.;,..•=:' -Y..-- '‘'.' =-'•-•. •e-••••.v:.,:i....,.:. 0.00 I',':1. . . :, , . "...1,:,,ri.11,„--.......,,,, t•-•st;..,•)!:•,,::',,--;,:,,: •',•,••........,9' r-.1.-..',•,. ,.;c • •...: ' -.1 • ;*.•• ; ,;-': .c `, , • : , ‘.:?:-,',0.\'',; ' 1 : • .2 - 0.00 ..-• •-..,,,,,-- ....,,,-. . ;....1-i.,........;;.....t ...-,.-.. v •-.- • - -- .4 • ---. _•-..• •• , , •••, _ , •- :-, , :--r.,;,; 0.00 SUBTOTAL . .00 .1
ADD 10% 0.00
L TOTAL . 0.00 1
Sheet 9 of 15
467
DOC #2022000065339 Page 22 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: L1M01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC .

Item Quantity Unit
r-----.

Thick. (In) Unit Cost ($) .., item Cost . . , Sewer improvements - . . , ' . - -• - 1 AC Pacement, Remove & Repl For Trenching ',;: ' -200 SF NA 22.00 4,400.00 2 Backflow Prevention Device ' .• ;. '9 EA NA 318.00 0.00 3 Cleanout I .,- - t EA NA 72.00 0.00
4 interceptor (Grease, 011, Sand) - •l • 0 EA - NA 4,026.00 0.00 Manhole, , 5' Dia., Precast, w/ T-Lock Coating:
5 6' Deep ' .' •0 EA NA 10,594.00 0.00
6 8' Deep r ... EA NA 11,654.00 0.00 \
7 10' Deep , . -1.4 EA NA 12,713.00 177,982.00
8 PVC, SDR 35,6" ••--. ,:.,'.....! IF NA 25.00 0.00
9 PVC, SDR 35, 8" ' 30,1951 LF NA 36.00 108,705.96
10 PVC, SDR 35, 12" ,.,•', • • IF NA 48.00 0.00
11 Sewer Manhole Ring & Cover (Cast Iron) 7:". ., EA NA 535.00 0.00 12 VCP, 6" " 4 : . •-• IF NA 16.00 0.00
13 VCP, 8" ,

1. 'I.') i LF NA 17.00 0.00
14 Sewer Lateral Complete : •1'... ' 12.1„ EA NA 1,100.00 -, 133,100.00 - - ' :-• ..' •'' :-. • ' i. • •" .'" ‘..-'1'-'' , ...- 0.00 .. • r.• ' 0.00
. ,, ,-, , „,..-; ' 1 , ..„.^- ,- ; • ' . -, ; .: '
:, --, l, r . ,.--". • •. • • 0.00 7
;'• +. ,,'-• ' _ , .• "*.,‘ I,.,_ •-• "....,::C ;.- • . " , - 0.00 . • , - • .. 1,4. ,' , ' •', . t .• o'4• .41, • , ' .1. , •,, ••- ,-.• . , 4, . .,.: . -•i' .... _ ... . k '"' ' 1 • 4. "..-: ; :• . ..--: • p„.- , •- r. .. ••• . r" '' , .... _ ' 0.00 •..• • • , „ , :„.• , .
, •-„ . . -
: , 0.00 • , 0.00
- "" 7 ". --.:1. . .` e ..,-..;-...-, ...;.‘," .. • ''. ' '.: *.:1 ::',... ; :".. : .; ";.. .,:, . ...„ --. 0.00 ,... '- %.,' ',,.e:',%•„,„ . ..H •••-•:,. "• .?':', i'.'.•:',`. • .• ",..1-g ': 'f", ' r' ;.''.!, . k,. 0.00 -'.;_','.' ,-.."''... _':•'•,..! . ... - , ' _ 1-, . ' !,1.',!, ;_:,. ",-:, ..". „ , -„-:., , ..".,:. 0.00 ,, , .•,- . . .... .- - • 1 •- 0.00 .... - ' • .. .. • • 0.00
c -s , ::,:-..„-• - . 2, , :i. - '7.: „..--'•• . , „; - ... :. , “ •0 • ; '` . I ' „ . ' 1 . ,....

I ' '': •
!... ' . ':..',. - 0.00
r•:,, ".:.',1"*.,-, 6t.-.„:;•,' ', . .. -..," „.,..; ,'. _"'..,:'::' ...", '-', '. 4.Z'..-:. ; ':: - ' ::,: ; :1-:, .;.' X.': ...l. 1'"; , .•', 0.00 ' • - 0.00
-. : •, - :, „•._ 0.00
. ..• .•• .. - .- • ` 0.00 , , ':.:'7....., ...: -,: _ •',..-- „ _ .,, • : , . '.. a • _ '-,.. -• •: - '. ' ..:::, . .,.‘• -..x • . -: - i" - :.::: , ;.... 0.00 ' . • . -, •, • ': -•-• ..-.-• ".-• ', -'' ,. - ,•• ' ' -.. -' c.'• ' , ••••••-,. '',••-i " -,-i ... - 0.00 SUBTOTAL 424 187.96
ADD 10% 42,418.80
TOTAL 466,606.76
Sheet 10 of 15
468
DOC #2022000065339 Page 23 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity arG,.......‘Unit -...Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) -•Item Cost , .._ • , -...- IVIonumentation: . . .. . - • • . ? : • ,,, ' • . - 1, County Standard (Well) Monument "•";:- (,.• ., ',.• .2.• 0 EA NA 2,050.00 0.00 2 Tract Boundary Monument •; '••' „,..6 EA NA 775.00 0.00 3 Lot Corner Monument ••. . • • •-;•0 EA NA 525.00 0.00 4 Street Centerline Monument wines 1,•'.a1,-•.a„,. 0 EA NA 1,02S.00- 0.00 ki •• s• ,-,i, •=: ••:• ••••.:. A - -,i ,- -" , •;.-• . • ,• ,••.• .1. • r „,1.. .. •.f .' i.. : .. . 4.. , - 4 ,,••:...,„ ,. • ,....".' "J':.: c f •.., . , , ..., . .s.4 •'. •....j •;_ : c • , ..•. • 0 - 0.00 r-,-:'..-c, .:' ..'2,' ....-e.:_ .,..-''. .:.'a1:2.:"...i..'.: --":, -.1.,....,•:*, o.00 „:..: _-F.-_- . -:,,„, -.: ,-,,,::: •i.,,--.....•-:., 0.00 - -..; . ••; --v... • - -_•, : = ., -. :." .- •;• : - , • -• , , a__., • ,•.- ..- -.. - ;•• •-•• !., 0.00 -_,, ':•••'• ',.;.'-•"- ... `•, ; (2.-..."..,%=•.: s=.:-.. -•,: '-..:.:::.:_ ..../....s. -:!.... " ,)'' -%.. "--,:-.,. _2 .l'---;._ 0.00 ;a . ,.' •,.-'•:......-r( , ., ,a.::•:7-•;s:•):i,--;_. r.;(47,....;.,"._ '-..... ;,......%1, ... .;-,I..,..,•. ...,`''- . „,...;c.,..- • %._•: 0.00 •-• • A . , ..i: ; . " - ' .. ..1, ' • i:,.•• ;7 :2, is le •.• .. ". ' -;• ••• ,•,'.' • " • ` '.,...• ! .•••! • s'' . )1' , 1, ...,,,t,1•,,• t `I ./.. "-.:•. •,..:, .4 .;••'- .. • , ,, - \,• . ? •' " ,• . •.-. •., ' , -• ,4 :. -•••!,`, • );•"‘,. -,:t 0.00 • .r s•- : ,- • '•.•• 7, ••.' :"• ••;* •- • •• •• .'• ,..: -*'. i ; •0 '..• -. • '. i'`C. , .„ , . ",i•.-1.' I _ . , : . • ..• •••,-;. "._ . . .. . ts.-••• 1 •• 't• IC-, ; , • . , • , 0.00 '.k. t .. . Fs. ''..:...7-::::.. i .‘ ; t .. ,:.• :. ;•-•:....,1 ..... 1.. " • .. • ' .:'s: •::,a ”.............' 0.00 •. , • . '•'• - ••-•:•. • •; •:.••••••- • ,, - ••• ' - rt• - -..- • •,„• , a..-, • • ...;_•• • 0.00 i•.-i• i"•;;. "a•.'?-,.-4--- . ':: ',1'-'-`r.-•t: '''.."„t's: : -_,••• ,••', ,i„-"•:-• .'. •,..3 ' •, '•-,‘ 1:-.'.....'„•;•t ..V.•';••:..,..12:‘ I. -..t.- ,.:•'a 0.00 ).-f ••."' . .'. f•',;•• _ ,'",".';'..,;',-..: :.,!„ .:,.• -..... 4 s.-',--:' ....;••• '..-a-'..a: k't I. ; " '.''.. %;".if '1.,.. 0.00 , 4_ ' '-'. -'' rr-".... !. ••• 1 .- ....." . 1 - - .‘ • , , .. •'...) . ,.. 14".`l - . ' • - 1 _ . _%. -.1 I, .. .2. • •v: 0.00 - -2 • , • • • - .• -• ;,.; ', .. .... • . :._ -N:-.,-':. , " '`. • ''': :- s' . •••. • . ...I.: -1 -•‘-•.• • *•• ' • ' . '` 0.00 •-•,• •:.. •,-;••••••,::,.. . ......., •••••,. „..„ ,,t, .. •,''., , ,:r , •',..... ,-,. 1::....Z.::'' ;':-. ., r, ,e•1, e ,.• I•,.z., I, ... ' -•,* 1..,„ 0.00 is:- :. ••• i‘j..' '',7:-.'.:.•; -: I-',-:...-.:.'-• '-,)','.ii:::/•:..., .' i.; ,:•,.. / : • ..,,..• *, .- *, -,,,, I:, 000.00 ,..'a.'.••••.:-,.. ":••••tz,•.,.,:_:••,-.• ,",;.• ',••.,:- .: ••-•_ •)2."-se•-, `.,,..,..,•..• ,=••- &„ -.. .. .7 ..? ; • - :„- 0.00 • . .0, •., -:. .. n •" ,.. -• . 4.!, • •, .4.•,- -.; ., ..: _•.,•.....-- , ..,• •-•.••.•-; .•:.•.- •. - -,...... • ,-, ,..., ,...,.. -k .• . -- ,,-, ...- •..•••, , •,,. _...,.... t. • •••,. „ , ,,. , .. •. _ a ....••s„,...- 0.00 - .. -,:.: , • , . '.,,,..f.;:-, : •-.:•-.....,:... ' '..•• '•:': 't... , - • . : ...; ,. -, .,-r. 0.00 t. • , , -:,, •%z•-• • • '4 .-• • ‘'. i.,,, -, • .i.: ,'. ,*.- ,..•,, ,.. s• . _ • • -..r. •. ,. aim J•.NN.:....1-1....' *.`Q's.:,:.fr. '' fi•$1.iv `.--;..1. .;.'..',„'. 1.i.' ..--.,-.'. 1.i' •:.'..:- .•::. 0.00 -- i`..s. •..- ., 0... ...--%...a....: , ...-...:.... a: L. •...: .- - i.• ---, 1,"0.• •!, .-_,-;.,. 0.00 1/4. .• , ...,. • t., ••. _.....- .••.-:'- • ..,.., _.- •, .- - - ,-.. ••••ii i. .. . -_: . i••... ,,... 0.00 „1. . , f , :... _•• .. . , e ', ..• r. •• • , . **; ••• • ; • *-7` ; 2, 0.00 1-•;.. 1.::•,•.' ..-- •:,\Pe.'•fz-•-:,-4..•" '-',..'•••/,• :,.-.i•.:..1',.. ,., -:'••••ss ...•,,,,---:-•f-, i••.i,.. :-,. ; _•'..•• ..,-...;7' 0.00 ;i`,,'-.;; :: ,: ..x;•, -,..,-;•„-,:`,:•,--;.,...1,-....,-1, i'....".F'0„,f, -‘•-,;•:...,': :•,,'rr.•:,--1::..-: ir.,•'•',; 1•';-•• .1-, ,tr. .,--:: 0.00 •-.g a-••.•':s.-';•-•'-':-..2-.• •-"I',' ••••‘•,r .?..1..-•:(•:,,-.'. ,..' .--"•••••':'; 1:•'-'a. ',' ,' • • 0.00 ..;- • .-- t ••-,---,:, .,•;-,;:- 1 :. • ',"-,.•2,1-;'! _ '...-•_. ,• •;e:- ;;;-' .--* ' •-,. •" •-•"-' :" ., -; • i - a. :......."--.. -2'. •••. ; '2.,,•s'.:•-,-..' •--._, -.....? • " '', .: ' ':;....; • ';,'- ,. •-__,','.s _-_ 0.00 -t'.'. . '•vc'_ : '.- •-,-S. •••:; -...2%..'2,:" '-'•:;:* • s•.' --•-','f'• '.'•.-: : :s: .;• "......-:'•/''.-:-1-.' -' 0.00 ''t%,, :, • '‘-:;::`,Sze:#i',"; :.;,,; `-'"•-•‘ : -,/''' 1 ":."),•:' `'Cv4 ..' .; '-' •-;....'. ....:'..,:'..: :z.., s'",..-;'_, 0.00 a-‘, • • --;15: ,-t•.•,,-,.--...*'• • z: •'•,:'.'''',-,• .. _•-.•.7), • ;Y.: :‘,..-.:,.-;. , is:-... .- .0, - ".r. z : ,-,.'•:„. --.', ._. '•,- 0.00 f SUBTOTAL 0.00 I
ADD 10% _ 0.00
1- TOTAL 0.00
Sheet 11 of 15
469
DOC #2022000065339 Page 24 of 27

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)

CITY OF SANTA PAULA
r1EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTBMATE OF COST
-------PrOra-t-No:,. -PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC
Item Quantity Unit' .ThIck. (in) Unit Co 'i rs., Item Cost Reclaimed Water Improvements .' • ,•.,
1 6" PVC C-900, CL 150 ,: '_ 0 LF NA- 29.00 r-076(r\
2 8" PVC C-900, CL 150 , ' 0 LF NA 35.00 0.00 ---1,
3 10" PVC C-900, CL 150 .. ' 0 LF NA 46.00 0.00
4 12" PVC C-900, CL 150 , .0 LF NA 68.00 0.00
5 6" PVC C-900, CL 200 Q LF NA 33.00 0.00
6 8" PVC C-900, CL 200 ' •' 0 LF NA 41.00 0 00
7 10" PVC C-900, CL 200 '. 0 LF NA 52.00 0.00
8 12" PVC C-900, CL 200 , 0 LF NA 72.00 0.00
9 6" Tee, In Place -0 EA NA 452.00 0.00
10 8" x 6" Tee, In Place , .• 0 EA NA 655.00 0.00

11. 8" Tee, In Place i. 0 EA NA 685.00 0.00
12 10" x 6" Tee or 10" x 8" Tee, In Place , . 0 EA NA 950.00 0.00 13 10" Tee, In Place " 0 EA NA 1,015.00 -„ 0.00
14 12" Tee, In Place - •••0 EA NA 1,210.00 ' . 0.00
15 8" Cross, In Place ; ‘" ••'' 0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
16 10" Cross, In Place " , •': 0 EA NA 1,300.00 0.00,,
17 12" Cross, In Place ' 0 EA NA 1,500.00 0.00
18 8" x 6" Reducer, In Place " 0 EA NA 453.00 0.00
19 10" x 8" Reduced, In Place 0 EA NA 640.00 0.00
20 12" x 8" or 12" x 10" Reducer, In Place 0 EA NA 890.00 0.00 21 2" Blow-Off, In Place . . ' Q EA NA 1,800.00 0.00
22 6" Blow-Off, In Place , , .. , '0 EA NA 4,570.00 0,00 23 6" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place -. • .0 EA NA 465.00 0.00 24 8" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place . .. ' 0 EA NA 640.00 0.00 25 10" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place , ' • ' .,: 0 EA NA 780.00 0.00 26 12" Elbow 90° or 45°, In Place ,•••', :0 EA NA 910.00 0.00 27 6" Valve, In Place . 0 EA NA 1,040.00 0.00
28 8" Valve, In Place . .„0 EA NA 1,270.00 0.00
29 10" Valve, In Place : 0 EA NA 1,790.00 0.00
30 12" Valve, In Place ' ' . 0 EA NA 2,120.00 0.00
31 1" Air Release • '• :0 EA NA 2,500.00 0.00
32 2" Air Release '0 EA NA 3,740.00 0.00
33 1" RP Backflow Device •0 EA NA 725.00 0.00
34 1-1/2" RP Backflow Device ' ‚0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
35 2" RP Backflow Device „ 0 EA NA 1,300.00 0.00
36 6" RP Backflow Device . ,,Q EA NA 11,900.00 0.00
37 8" RP Backflow Device ' ' 0 EA NA 16,600.00 0.00
38 Slope Erosion Control '0 LS NA 0.00
SU TOTAL ($) -1 0.00
continued on Sheet 13
Sheet 12 of 15
470
DOC #2022000065339 Page 25 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROTENTS) ESTIMATE OF COST
-Project No. LIIV101.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC
Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) Item Cost
„ Reclaimed Water IMpimuements Cont.
38 16" Elbow 90° cir 450, In Place EA NA 2,310.00 0.00
39 20" Elbow 90° qr 450, In Place - o EA -• • NA 3,220.00 0.00 40 16" Valve, In Place .•••0 EA NA 4,480.00 0.00
41 20" Valve,' In Place •••• '
• ,-, 0 EA NA 6,420.00 0.00
42 12" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 87.00 0.00 43 14" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 87.00 0.00 44 16" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place LF NA 97.00 0.00 45 20" Mortar Lined & Coated Steel Pipe, In Place .; • 0 IF NA 145.00 0.00 46 Backflow Preventio Device - Fire Line 0 EA NA 3,900.00 0.00 47 6" Double Decector Check EA NA 11,000.00 0.00
48 8" Double Detector Check .1 1,4. s'et) EA NA 15,270.00 0.00 49 10" Double Detector Check t• o EA NA 16,900.00 0.00
50 Slope Anctior Blocks • f• EA NA 400.00 0.00
51 1" Service, Complete 0 EA NA 1,000.00 0.00
52 2" Service, Complete 7.7f EA NA 2,130.00 0.00
53 3" Service, complete • EA NA 5,300.00 0.00
54 Encaseinents LF NA 30.00 0.00
55 8" Tapping Sleeve , • •• •
EA NA 2,900.00 0.00
56 10" Tapplig Sleeve EA NA 3,200.00 0.00
57 12" Tapphig Sleeve l•foltf,:t EA NA 3,650.00 0.00
• ;. " • ; • • • .; • r - 0.00
• '44 •' •••••*%.-;• ••'; • t' 0 . • . • ;F••••- .,• r, ' • '••- • „ ' „. ::•"• % ,. • :•• ;,_ • 0.00 • ••

1... • • r IP • • .. • -AV • •• • 0.00
, • i ,•L'.•,*•'..• ; •-, , 0.00 ,..•••••• , : • P.',,
1•0 t. I. 1' I •" • .- 0.00
• ‘. • s • ••• . • 0.00 r.• • • i• I
401 • • •• • 1 • - al • • •. • • • 1.• •j• -*-1i-....% • •• 1.• : 0.00 • , „.- . • %.d. • t! J.• 0.00
•.--••1;*.•". • „ - ••• .'„te .• •••• • • 0.00
'.•• •,•-'v,:•„;:';';.•:•,••%; • , • '•••• ; • ' ' • 1,3 0.00 -k• :1;t:, A j,
; • 0.00
, - r • , , ". ... . • ,:.. - . . , • . . ..... . 1. • .. •• .e. •.•• !• r.......7. • '-' ,• ' 0.00
,..,,.. ,
.' ' .-
• . 1.„ ,`p , ....4.
'
• • . ., . 0..... , " •• . Or: ... '• .:_ r ' - ' . . L.. :I. i...4.' , • .

I • ..• .. .
-.• ,
.. ' s.f. •' ' 0.00
.,,,,. • ...e. A:. ,,,„ . r Z .. ;1'4: . , •.‘. .• ; ...... , I •*
,
: ill •,' ..."."-,-, , •• • • . - • ,• .
.. . 0.00
•r• • .
" ;• . • " ' - ,•
41•:,. • • •
• • ••
SUBTOTAL SHEET 13
TOTAL (SHEET 12 & 13)
ADD 10%
TOTAL
Sheet 13 of 15

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 471
DOC #2022000065339 Page 26 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No: LIM01.4521-PARCEL 6065 PUBLIC Item Quantity Unit Thick. (in) Unit Cost ($) item Cost
, Misc. Water SiSeiNer' Improvements - - • ..
n ge. •- -.?„,- :.-- --.:.a 0.00
.. -... . . .. 0.00
•'''. ;••?' : ' ' c•:,•21,','• .• -'''';'-.. ••?: it.. ..';''-'; ' t ,.).....:•••:,. -'., ' a-`... ' ' I' • - ' . MOO •-• .
' - • , .. . 1, •a t .. " MOO , --• • • ' :, • - . ,--:,a_-' - ,L.- - :,,. • '• • - "tt• • : • ... •. ..- • .• U." ' • aoo .',:. ,,c, r - , , .. •••• • ...4. .. h. 4 • .,
• ..› x,'•' I . ''''' - -.." :%, '. . I
; . • i .1' • •
'4' . ',...-.

C..' ..•
'''
. ' .•
' 0 • '
I t,.. • .:• • t 2A. •
. . 0.00
... , ,1 • . - •. • - 0.00
•.• go• .. --.: •-,.•cl- :.... 4,- ..-• . t ' : •...•.r...-: • 0.00 ... - L••• • '',..: ......• t -, • " . • ..• • h • • ..; i ' i• • • h %••.r. ,.. • . ' ' '. •• • ' I • • '2 1 • (100 d

4. 's ' • " . •I:'•;:.:.% . '-' :.;•:' • :-:..'r. ... 1.: "c•-/ 17: - .....• . .7 L. `..- -... s F: . 4 .• ...1. .. -..* . 0.00 , q: •., .., •:. •.;•--, ,.., •- '4I.^ ,,.:. : . ti '''' /' ' n''' - s' a ' "- ' " ' ' ." ' 0.00 . •,_ - •. . -. .•.,-.. • ....•-• --:•,-. - - 0.00 ., ., I, '-.;
04" • .0 .40 -. : .-;....., •-•: , .,,,,4z.,,.
v.--,-•-• .,..,..:01,_ . - „. -......1 . '..-:. .. •,:- •••,=••• •--__. • •.. : . . , •N;
*,
•Te - -ft .•4, ._-, . -u., • ••.•:. •" -a 0.00 - ••, 1,„ • • .. a. . •••• , a . '. ' ‘. - . 0.00 a, , • . •_.•-_, 4, e.- ....• •,:, .5 •••_:-..., -• •. a./. -.. ,, ••••,-• :' ;• - , a_. • . , • . I. • 0.00 , ,, , E,'..._, •••... '1 . "i_ ',. . •--...,..; . . .: , 4' . ‘. . - I.' ' Y. „ .' ."..= o 0.00 :• "
• -•,- t rs.". ". : •' . . ,... ;'.., ----.. •••• ,, '1>. •.",.: ;1/4"-.,i.--, - '' : '"-- • ,• , ' : 'I -. MOO _ . . =. .-'-„ : . , ,' ,. ... 0.00 •.•---, .-.1 a..,, ..:.a.••a• '-'%,"-•_ a. 1,,..: .-. :-. a. : ' ,...,.• - ••'•.,..., • ,•-: .._ . - ._ 0.00 ,:..--..- :,•.44:1 ••••f... --.. ,,,-.• , •,:......a.a, •-t."....•_ at...' , r• - ••••••. 4.• , •.„ , •.. a, MOO ., - ..
-, - •,,: ,„„...a• ,,:. •::L$ e ,
' -... ''' ' • • ' k •••• • • : .. •tt .:-?..-- ' .. .i ..:.., .:. • •••..... • - .....‘; .• ; ,‘ . .• '1• , 0.00 ", • 1 . ; ,. • .• 1 , .: .• • .4..4.4 'e ` . ..•'''. ,-•• 1. ••' • • s

0.00 `_1.-•• • • .••,., ,, f, • . • ' l' •• . .. aa.i ,.• .-•• 2 ' .-. :.: - ..:- ...••••.... .,.:,•• ' ',a. -,'-f'.. • -,• .. 0..0 • •,,•.: ,. t• -1.: :1 . ,1.•4i",* - '•' • ••,• • .., 7., v '', .1 ‘•44... MOO
k.....4 V 0.00
. ..„ .• S.\0,r;;;C•,... ,Z7.t ..: .. . . .. .;;;':. '' '''• t":1:: II r.if:ti.':. .... G ...2.;/' .• '..: 0.00 - " f i•- - ,_ .. 0.00
a? 1, a.:,• ...., .. , 0.00
• ",n).:''..-::, .•:', ••• • • - , . ,..t..i. • a - . .••••• , ... , .,..... ",. •, 0.00 •-••
.: •-: -, ,. ••••••.. , 7 .•• .. , "' 'S. ..:,• , ..o. : -. L I ' 0.00 e• 1.-:'-t•?•....". .,';'-...,."...'-,:l..,,c1 ' ; '..-'.....':-,:i-. %-1-:•:, ;.--,-.,-1.',,-.:.'.' '-‘..-', '' , :•--.. ,,- `-r- o.00 • - . . .. 0.00
r - i. • :r., - , n• ....•I, . „• -,.; ..„-, , .= , . , . , ..: ' •"4 ' . I;-%••• ' ..• ..g?' ,'.. • ,' . ,.• 4.: ' , .•::.4 3 b' -," . -.',`.;, ' .' " . '...'" ... ; ‘. ir. ..... • - • 1 As • 0.00 - i• • ..• 4. 2 • .; . .. '!....4 15 ...-: ..... :14 ....1.: a.t ,-, , % ..... .. ' . !,...: . '''',, ,..:-.4- ' . ., 0.00 _ !„--::.a.' . ...• :. ,, .., : -...:41/4-4-„::.•••:211 ;:•:Zja.....•.• '.. MOO - i-;••• ; ...-a.“ .,,.:„. ......i•„: :.,:t.', 7..r1...- .t2...- t'''.. -
..- , ;-.',.' .• ,.-_,:^:,:,- % aoo . 0.00
SUBTOTAL 0.00 _
ADD 10% 1 0.00 -
- ..._
TOTAL 0.00
Sheet 14 of 15
472
DOC #2022000065339 Page 27 of 27

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ESTIMATE OF COST
OFFSITE (PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) Project No:
• ",FEE EST1MAT,E5.8HEET
••:" j›; •';': s • •‘. • • ;i•
• , t
1, • '`Ce i•-•••: . ' •
•f.

Total City of Santa Paula Grading:

Total City of Santa Paula Public Imp.:

SWPCP Fee: Total Lot Acreage (See Sheet 10):

SWPPP Fee:

Improvement Plan Check Fee:

Grading Plan Check Fee:

General Plan Fee:

Soils & Geology Fee: **worm/wog Costs MayBe Added to this Fee) Grading Permit Fee:
(See Sheet 1)
(See Sheet 1)
0 Improvement Inspection Fee:

Grading Inspection Fee:

Total City of Santa Paula
Submittal Fees
Total City of Santa Paula
Inspection Fees
Pee Estimates Sheet 15 of 15

0.00 995,715.57
400
0 21,925.02
1,000.00
9,957.16
500.00
750.00
34,532.18
22,800.02
1,000.00
23,800.02
473
65283.00302\42446148.6

EXHIBIT C
TO

PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT
Amendment to Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map No. 6065 (Tract Map No. 6074)
[Attached behind]
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Clete Saunier, Public Works Director
Subject: COMMUNITY BIKE TRAIL CONNECTIVITY PROJECT DESIGN AWARD Date: August 21, 2024
Agenda Item: 11.B

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

MEMORANDUM
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with MNS Engineers, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $841,756.00 for professional design services for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project;

2. Approve budget adjustments as shown in Table 2 of the Staff Report for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project.

Presented by: Public Works Director Clete Saunier
BACKGROUND:

The Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project will allow for the extension of the existing Class I bike trail from its easterly terminus at 12
th Street to Santa Paula Creek, then north along the
Ventura County Watershed Protection District levee road to its northerly limit. The northerly extension will allow for interconnection of the future Class II bike lanes at the western end of the Santa Paula Street Bridge over Santa Paula Creek. This connection will allow local residents and bicycle commuters ready access to the Class I bike facility which in turn provides cross-town connectivity along the VCTC rail right of way. Additionally, the project provides for the extension of the current western terminus of the Class I bikeway at Peck Road to the City’s western boundary.

ANALYSIS:

The specific work for the design phase includes developing a separate set of plans, specifications, and estimates for each project. The consultant is tasked with the following:

1. Project management including progress meetings, schedule, communications, coordination, quality assurance and quality control, and monthly invoicing.

2. Data gathering including site visits, preliminary investigations, permitting requirements, geotechnical investigation, and survey.

3. Public engagement including preparing presentations for up to three public meetings to convey the overall design concepts and seeking feedback. 499

4. Schematic design, including three design iterations prior to the final design.

5. Environmental analysis.

6. Design development for construction bid-ready plans, specifications, and estimates.

7. Final design drawings.

8. Bid phase assistance.

A request for proposals (RFP) was issued on May 9, 2024, and closed on June 20, 2024. Two consulting firms submitted proposals. City staff, including the Deputy City Manager, Community Development Director, and Interim City Engineer reviewed and evaluated the proposals. The criteria used to evaluate the proposals are consistent with the City’s procurement policies and include items such as the bidder’s experience and ability, technical capability and project methodology, responses to the request for proposal for completeness to the requirements, and references with demonstrated success with similar work to the scope of service. The review team determined that MNS was the most qualified consultant. The MNS team had significant local bicycle project experience, including team members who had worked on the previous Class I bike lane project for Santa Paula along the current VCTC rail right of way. MNS meets all required City contractual provisions, including possession of a City business tax certificate, insurance certificates, and corporate filing with the California Secretary of State. Based upon the available information and research performed to date, staff believes that this consultant is capable of satisfactorily meeting the needs of the City.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Project supports the currently adopted Strategic Plan in achieving the following goals:

Infrastructure, Transportation & Mobility
Goal: Maintain and develop the City’s infrastructure to be safe, sustainable, innovative and cost-efficient.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

Funding for the $841,756.00 contract with MNS is provided in the FY 2023-2025 capital improvement budget, utilizing the proposed FY 2023-2024 Bike Trail Connectivity Project (9378) budget.

Table 1: Available Funding Sources – Community Bike Trail Connectivity (9378) Fund Account Number Budget Available
Measure T 104-5-9378-290 $200,000.00
Measure T 104-5-9378-660 $190,000.00
TDA Article 3 282-5-9378-290 $154,050.00
TDA Article 3 282-5-9378-660 $1,327,950.00
Total $1,872,000.00
Table 2: Budget Adjustments Needed - Community Bike Trail Connectivity (9378) Fund Source Account No. Decrease Increase
500
CIP 9378 282-5-9378-290 $487,706.00
CIP 9378 282-5-9378-660 $487,706.00
Table 3: Updated Budget Allocations - Community Bike Trail Connectivity (9378) Fund Account No. Description Total
Measure T 104-5-9378-290 Professional Services $200,000.00 Measure T 104-5-9378-660 Construction $190,000.00
TDA Article 3 282-5-9378-290 Professional Services $641,756.00 TDA Article 3 282-5-9378-660 Construction $840,244.00
Total $1,872,000.00
OPTIONS:

The Council has the following available alternative options to staff’s recommendations:

1. Do not approve the agreement to MNS as recommended by staff. Doing so may not allow the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project to advance in a timely manner and meet grant deadlines.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 MNS Engineers Agreement.pdf
Attachment 2 Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project Map.pdf 501
ATTACHMENT 1
MNS Engineers Agreement
502
65283.00007\41133458.1
-1- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA
AND MNS ENGINEERS, INC.

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this 21st day of August 2024, by and between the City of Santa Paula, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California with its principle place of business at 970 Ventura Street, Santa Paula, CA 93060, County of Ventura, State of California ("City") and MNS Engineers, Inc., a California Corporation with its principal place of business at 201 N. Calle Cesar Chavez Suite 300, Santa Barbara, CA 93103 ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing quality infrastructure consulting services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such professional services for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity project ("Project") as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional quality infrastructure consulting services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from August 21, 2024 to June 30, 2025, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the Services.
503
65283.00007\41133458.1
-2- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.2 Compensation.

3.2.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed Eight Hundred Forty One Seven Hundred Fifty Six Dollars and no cents ($841,756.00) without written approval of the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.2.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly invoice which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The invoice shall describe the amount of Services provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the invoice.

City shall, within 30 days of receiving such invoice, review the invoice and pay all non-disputed and approved charges. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, the City shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth therein. Payment shall not constitute acceptance of any Services completed by Consultant. The making of final payment shall not constitute a waiver of any claims by the City for any reason whatsoever.

3.2.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City and included in Exhibit "C" of this Agreement.

3.2.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.3 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.3.1 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.

Any personnel performing the Services on behalf of Consultant shall not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, or any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultants officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law.

Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.

3.3.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services in a reasonably prompt and timely manner and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that 504
65283.00007\41133458.1
-3- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services expeditiously.

Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

3.3.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.3.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows:

Brandon Reyes, Vice President - Transportation.

3.3.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates Clete Saunier, Public Works Director, or his/her designee, to act as its representative in all matters pertaining to the administration and performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for review and approval of all products submitted by Consultant but not the authority to enlarge the Scope of Services or change the total compensation due to Consultant under this Agreement. The City Manager shall be authorized to act on City's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the Scope of Services or change the Consultant's total compensation subject to the provisions contained in this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City Manager, City's Representative or his/her designee.

3.3.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Brandon Reyes, Vice President - Transportation, or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.3.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.3.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply 505
65283.00007\41133458.1
-4- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its subconsultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.3.9 Period of Performance.

3.3.9.1 Consultant shall perform and complete all Services under this Agreement within the term set forth in Section 3.1.2 above (“Performance Time”). Consultant shall also perform the Services in strict accordance with any completion schedule or Project milestones described in Exhibits “A” or “B” attached hereto, or which may be separately agreed upon in writing by the City and Consultant (“Performance Milestones”). Consultant agrees that if the Services are not completed within the aforementioned Performance Time and/or pursuant to any such Performance Milestones developed pursuant to provisions of this Agreement, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage.

3.3.9.2 Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing Party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include a Force Majeure Event. A Force Majeure Event shall mean an event that materially affects a Party’s performance and is one or more of the following: (1) Acts of God or other natural disasters; (2) terrorism or other acts of a public enemy; (3) orders of governmental authorities (including, without limitation, unreasonable and unforeseeable delay in the issuance of permits or approvals by governmental authorities that are required for the services); (4) strikes and other organized labor action occurring at the site and the effects thereof on the services, only to the extent such strikes and other organized labor action are beyond the control of Consultant and its subcontractors, and to the extent the effects thereof cannot be avoided by use of replacement workers; and (5) pandemics, epidemics or quarantine restrictions. For purposes of this section, “orders of governmental authorities,” includes ordinances, emergency proclamations and orders, rules to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and other actions of a public agency applicable to the services and Agreement.

3.3.9.3 Should a Force Majeure Event occur, the non-performing Party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other Party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. Force Majeure Events and/or delays, regardless of the Party responsible for the delay, shall not entitle Consultant to any additional compensation.

Notwithstanding the foregoing in this section, the City may still terminate this Agreement in accordance with the termination provisions of this Agreement.

3.3.10 Laws and Regulations; Employee/Labor Certification.

3.3.10.1 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Services and this Agreement. 506
65283.00007\41133458.1
-5- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
All violations of such laws and regulations shall be grounds for the City to terminate the Agreement for cause.

3.3.10.2 Employment Eligibility; Consultant. Consultant certifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time and shall require all subconsultants and sub-subconsultants to comply with the same. Consultant certifies that it has not committed a violation of any such law within the five (5) years immediately preceding the date of execution of this Agreement, and shall not violate any such law at any time during the term of the Agreement.

3.3.10.3 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.3.10.4 Air Quality. To the extent applicable, Consultant must fully comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and/or California Air Resources Board (CARB). Consultant shall indemnify City against any fines or penalties imposed by SCAQMD, CARB, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable laws, rules and/or regulations by Consultant, its subconsultants, or others for whom Consultant is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement.

3.3.10.5 Water Quality Management and Compliance. Consultant shall keep itself and all subcontractors, staff, and employees fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may impact, or be implicated by the performance of the Services including, without limitation, all applicable provisions of the City’s ordinances regulating water quality and storm water; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq.); the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Water Code § 13000 et seq.); and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued pursuant to any such authority. Consultant must additionally comply with the lawful requirements of the City, and any other municipality, drainage district, or other local agency with jurisdiction over the location where the Services are to be conducted, regulating water quality and storm water discharges. City may seek damages from Consultant for delay in completing the Services caused by Consultant’s failure to comply with the laws, regulations and policies described in this Section, or any other relevant water quality law, regulation, or policy.

3.3.10.6 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed.

3.3.11 Insurance.
507
65283.00007\41133458.1
-6- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.3.11.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section. Failure to provide and maintain all required insurance shall be grounds for the City to terminate this Agreement for cause.

3.3.11.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant, in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.
(A) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office "occurrence" form CG 00 01, or equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.

The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions (1) limiting coverage for contractual liability; (2) excluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another (cross-liability); (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) containing any other exclusion(s) contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement.
(B) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering "Any Auto" (Symbol 1), or equivalent, covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities with limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined limit for each occurrence. (C) Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation
Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease. (D) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): Professional Liability insurance or Errors & Omissions insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession with limits of not less than $1,000,000. Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement that fall within the areas of disciplines that Consultant is in, provided that such coverage is commercially available and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the work to be performed (for example, any exclusions relating to lead, asbestos, pollution, testing, underground storage tanks, laboratory analysis, soil work, etc.). If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least five (5) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.

3.3.11.3 Insurance Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the City to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:
(A) Commercial General Liability: (1) Additional Insured: The City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds with 508
65283.00007\41133458.1
-7- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement.

Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to "ongoing operations"; (2) exclude "contractual liability"; (3) restrict coverage to "sole" liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement. For all policies of Commercial General Liability insurance, Consultant shall provide endorsements in the form of ISO CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01 (or endorsements providing the exact same coverage) to effectuate this requirement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (B) Automobile Liability. (1) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(C) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): 1) Cancellation:

Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (2) Contractual Liability Exclusion Deleted: This insurance shall include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and include a provision establishing the insurer’s duty to defend. (D) Workers' Compensation: (1) Cancellation: Required
insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium. (2) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.

3.3.11.4 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All policies of Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.3.11.5 Waiver of Subrogation. All required insurance coverages, except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.

3.3.11.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible or selfinsured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.
509
65283.00007\41133458.1
-8- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.3.11.7 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates on forms approved by the City, together with all endorsements affecting each policy. Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been submitted to the City for approval. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least ten (10) days prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the required coverage, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.

3.3.11.8 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to transact business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

3.3.11.9 Enforcement of Agreement Provisions (non estoppel).

Consultant acknowledges and agrees that actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligation on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

3.3.11.10 Requirements Not Limiting. Requirement of specific coverage or minimum limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance.

3.3.11.11 Additional Insurance Provisions
(A) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification.
(B) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
(C) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (D) Neither the Consultant, City nor any of its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or 510
65283.00007\41133458.1
-9- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
by virtue of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant’s officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers may be held personally liable if so determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(E) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law.
(F) Consultant shall report to the City, in addition to Consultant’s insurer, any and all insurance claims submitted by Consultant in connection with the Services under this Agreement.

3.3.11.12 Insurance for Subconsultants. Consultant shall include all subconsultants engaged in any work for Consultant relating to this Agreement as additional insureds under the Consultant's policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds to the subconsultant's policies. All policies of Commercial General Liability insurance provided by Consultant’s subconsultants performing work relating to this Agreement shall be endorsed to name the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds using endorsement form ISO CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing equivalent coverage. Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract relating to this Agreement until it has received satisfactory evidence of subconsultant’s compliance with all insurance requirements under this Agreement, to the extent applicable. The Consultant shall provide satisfactory evidence of compliance with this section upon request of the City.

3.4 Labor Code Requirements.

3.4.1 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 511
65283.00007\41133458.1
-10- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.4.2 Registration/DIR Compliance. If the Services are being performed on a public works project of over $25,000 when the project is for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work, or a public works project of over $15,000 when the project is for maintenance work, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants.

3.4.3 Compliance Monitoring. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR. Any stop orders issued by the DIR against Consultant or any subconsultant that affect Consultant’s performance of services, including any delay, shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Consultant caused delay and shall not be compensable by the City. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the DIR against Consultant or any subconsultant.

3.4.4 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.5 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those Services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. The rights and remedies of the City provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law, equity or under this Agreement.

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.6 Indemnification.

3.6.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to defend (with 512
65283.00007\41133458.1
-11- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
counsel of City’s reasonable approval), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident in whole or in part, to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses except such loss or damage caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

3.6.2 If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims to the extent they arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

3.7 General Provisions.

3.7.1 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.7.2 Independent Contractors and Subcontracting.

3.7.2.1 Use of Consultants. Consultant is aware of statutory and case law regarding classification of workers as independent contractors, including California Labor Code Section 2750.3 and Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018). To ensure that Consultant is in compliance with the California Labor Code, Consultant shall only utilize its employees to provide the Services. Consultant may not provide the services through any independent contractor, subcontractor or subconsultant (“Subcontractor(s)”) unless approved by the City as set forth in Section 3.7.2.2 below. Consultant represents and warrants that all personnel who perform the Services on Consultant’s behalf are Consultant’s employees, and that Consultant complies with all applicable laws, rules and regulations governing its employees, including, but not limited to, the California Labor Code, Unemployment Insurance Code and all applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders.

3.7.2.2 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not use any Subcontractor to provide the Services, or any portion of the work required by this Agreement, without prior written approval of City. In the event that City authorizes Consultant to use a Subcontractor, Consultant shall enter into a written agreement with the Subcontractor, which must 513
65283.00007\41133458.1
-12- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
include all provisions of the Agreement, including a restriction on the Subcontractor’s use of further independent contractors, subcontractors or subconsultants without the City’s prior written consent.

3.7.3 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant: MNS Engineers, Inc.
201 N. Calle Cesar Chavez Suite 300
Santa Barbara, CA 93103
ATTN: Brandon Reyes, Vice President - Transportation
City: City of Santa Paula
970 Ventura Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
ATTN: Clete Saunier, Public Works Director
Such notice shall be in writing and shall be considered given either: (i) when delivered in person to the recipient named above; (ii) on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt, after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope as either registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, and postage and postal charges prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named above; (iii) by overnight courier, on the first (1st) business day after being delivered to a recognized overnight courier; or (iv) on the date and time of delivery shown in the records of the transmitting party after transmission by facsimile machine or email to the recipient named above.

3.7.4 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.7.4.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. With the exception of Consultant’s pre-existing concepts, materials, data and standard details (pre-existing Intellectual Property), This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data").

Except for Consultant’s pre-existing Intellectual Property, all Documents & Data shall be and remain the property of City, and shall not be used in whole or in substantial part by Consultant on other projects without the City’s express written permission. Within thirty (30) days following the completion, suspension, abandonment or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City reproducible copies of all Documents & Data, in a form and amount required by City. City reserves the right to select the method of document reproduction and to establish where the reproduction will be accomplished. The reproduction expense shall be borne by City at the actual cost of duplication. In the event of a dispute regarding the amount of compensation to which the Consultant is entitled under the termination provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide all Documents & Data to City upon payment of the undisputed amount. Consultant shall have no right to retain or fail to provide to City any such documents pending resolution of the dispute. In addition, Consultant shall retain copies of all Documents & Data on file for a minimum of fifteen (15) years following completion of the Project, and shall make copies available to City upon the payment of actual reasonable duplication costs. Before destroying the Documents & Data 514
65283.00007\41133458.1
-13- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
following this retention period, Consultant shall make a reasonable effort to notify City and provide City with the opportunity to obtain the documents.

3.7.4.2 Subconsultants. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or its subconsultants, or those provided to Consultant by the City.

3.7.4.3 Right to Use. City shall not be limited in any way in its use or reuse of the Documents and Data or any part of them at any time for purposes of this Project or another project, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement or on a project other than this Project without employing the services of Consultant shall be at City’s sole risk. If City uses or reuses the Documents & Data on any project other than this Project, it shall remove the Consultant’s seal from the Documents & Data and indemnify and hold harmless Consultant and its officers, directors, agents and employees from claims arising out of the negligent use or re-use of the Documents & Data on such other project. Consultant shall be responsible and liable for its Documents & Data, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, only with respect to the condition of the Documents & Data at the time they are provided to the City upon completion, suspension, abandonment or termination. Consultant shall not be responsible or liable for any revisions to the Documents & Data made by any party other than Consultant, a party for whom the Consultant is legally responsible or liable, or anyone approved by the Consultant.

3.7.4.4 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by City of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted.

3.7.4.5 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.7.4.6 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information ("Proprietary Information") unless the City's legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, 515
65283.00007\41133458.1
-14- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information.

Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the release notice to give City written notice of Consultant's objection to the City's release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of an objection notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City's choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non-appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.7.5 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.7.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements.

3.7.7 Attorneys’ Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorneys’ fees and all costs of such action.

3.7.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Ventura County. In addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions, Consultant must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code sections 900 et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the City. Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, claims, and/or changed conditions have been followed by Consultant. If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as specified herein, Consultant shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit against the City.

3.7.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.7.10 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.7.11 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.7.12 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City, which may be withheld for any reason. Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination.

Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the Services required by this Agreement, except 516
65283.00007\41133458.1
-15- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.

3.7.13 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

3.7.14 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.7.15 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.7.16 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.7.17 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.7.18 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.7.19 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.7.20 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
517
65283.00007\41133458.1
-16- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

3.7.21 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification obligations, shall survive any such expiration or termination. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
518
65283.00007\41133458.1
-17- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

SIGNATURE PAGE TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA PAULA AND
MNS ENGINEERS, INC.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has caused this Contract to be executed on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF SANTA PAULA MNS ENGINEERS, INC.
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary
OR Treasurer REQUIRED]
By:

Its:

Printed Name:

By:

Its:

Printed Name:

Approved By:

Dan Singer
City Manager
Approved as to Form:
_____________________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
Attested By:

Julie Latshaw
City Clerk
519
65283.00007\41133458.1
Exhibit “A”-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
520
June 20, 2024
Professional Engineering
Services for the Community
Bike Trail Connectivity Project

PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE

CITY OF

SANTA PAULA
CISTP.230474
100 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Suite 105 | Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 | 805.692.6921 Office | mnsengineers.com 521 > PLANNING > ENGINEERING > CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT > LAND SURVEYING RE: Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project
Dear Ms. Arnaout:

MNS Engineers, Inc. (MNS) appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide professional Engineering Services for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project (Project) for the City of Santa Paula (City).

Since 1962, MNS has provided quality infrastructure consulting services to the transportation, water resources, and government markets throughout California. We specialize in the core services of engineering, construction management, and land surveying and have served several cities and counties with bikeway improvements. The Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project has three distinctive bike segments which require bikeway experience in railroad, street, and flood control right-of-way (R/W).

MNS is pleased to present our qualified team to provide these key advantages:

Our Team's Core Benefits
Professional and Qualified Team
Leading the MNS team is Michael Ip, PE, QSD, Project Manager, with over 30 years of experience specializing in the design and management of transportation improvement projects. A seasoned, award-winning Principal Engineer, Michael is a natural leader known for completing fast-paced projects on time and on budget. Michael has served as Project Manager for past projects involving the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) Santa Paula Branch Line and Ventura County Watershed Protection District.

Our specialty subconsultants, whom we have worked with on similar projects, include Pacific Coast Land Design, Inc. (PCLD) for landscape architecture and public outreach, Earth Mechanics, Inc. (EMI) for geotechnical services, and TJW Engineering, Inc. (TJW) for lighting design services.

Similar Project Experience
The MNS team has provided engineering and design services for many bikeway improvements within railroad R/W including:
• Dockweiler Drive Extension and Railroad Avenue Bike Path Projects, City of Santa Clarita (at-grade railroad crossing and rails with trails) City of Santa Paula, City Clerk's Office
Attention: Tatiana Arnaout, PE
970 E. Ventura Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
June 20, 2024
MNS

DETAILS
Legal Name
MNS Engineers, Inc.

Firm Ownership Type
C-Corporation
Year Firm Established
1962
California Department of
Industrial Relations (DIR)
No. 1000003564
Corporate Office
201 N. Calle Cesar Chavez
Suite 300
Santa Barbara, CA 93103
805.692.6921 Office
www.mnsengineers.com
Thousand Oaks Office
100 E. Thousand Oaks
Boulevard
Suite 105
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
805.692.6921 Office
Project Contact
Michael Ip, PE, QSD
Project Manager
805.391.0415 mobile
[email protected]
Authorized Signature
Brandon Reyes, PE
Vice President - Transportation
951.532.4510 Mobile
[email protected]
522
CL.2 COVER LETTER
• Santa Claus Lane Class I Bike Path Project, Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (at-grade railroad crossing)
• B Street Railroad Crossing and Middle School Bike Path, City of Fillmore (at-grade railroad crossing) • Central Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Fillmore (at-grade railroad crossing) The following projects included bikeway in street R/W:
• Hillcrest Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements, City of Thousand Oaks • El Segundo Boulevard Improvements, City of El Segundo • Conejo School Road and Willow Lane Sidewalk and Bike Lanes Project, City of Thousand Oaks The following projects included bikeway in flood control R/W:
• Camarillo to California State University Channel Islands (CSUCI) Shared Path Feasibility Study, County of Ventura • Dockweiler Drive Extension, City of Santa Clarita
• Sespe Creek Bike Path, City of Fillmore
• University Drive Improvement Project, CSUCI
In Summary
In summary, MNS is confident our uniquely experienced and qualified team will provide quality services, ensuring a successful project delivery to meet the City's expectations and goals. We look forward to working with the City.

We acknowledge Addendum No. 1 and Responses to Request for Qualification dated June 6, 2024. Please contact Michael Ip, PE, QSD, at 805.391.0415 or [email protected] with any questions you may have about our submittal. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
MNS Engineers, Inc.

Brandon Reyes, PE
Vice President - Transportation
523

RFP FORM

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

TO PROVIDE SERVICES
PROPOSALS ARE DUE: Not later than 3:00 P.M. Thursday, June 13th, 2024, at the City Clerk’s office at 970 E. Ventura Street, Santa Paula, CA 93060.

The City of Santa Paula (City) is requesting proposals from qualified companies to provide professional engineering services for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project. The Request for Proposal (RFP) is enclosed. The RFP provides an introduction, schedule, City background, scope of services, deliverables, proposal requirements, insurance requirements, and evaluation criteria among other information.

The successful company shall execute a Professional Services Agreement with the City to perform the services.

One (1) original, two (2) hard copies, and one searchable pdf file less than 10mb in size on USB drive of the proposal shall be submitted to the following address:

City of Santa Paula
City Clerk’s Office
970 E. Ventura Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
Proposal shall include a copy of this form and be signed by the company’s authorized representative.

I have read, understood, and agree to the terms and conditions on all pages of the RFP.

The undersigned agrees to furnish the services stipulated in this RFP.

Company Address
Name (Print) Signature

Company Phone No. Title
100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard Suite 105
Brandon Reyes, PE
MNS Engineers, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
805.692.6921 Vice President - Transportation
524
ADDENDUM 1
Addendum No. 1

CITY OF SANTA PAULA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

TO PROVIDE SERVICES
PROPOSALS ARE DUE: Not later than 3:00 P.M. Thursday, June 20th, 2024, at the City Clerk’s office at 970 E. Ventura Street, Santa Paula, CA 93060.

The City of Santa Paula (City) is requesting proposals from qualified companies to provide professional engineering services for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project. The Request for Proposal (RFP) is enclosed. The RFP provides an introduction, schedule, City background, scope of services, deliverables, proposal requirements, insurance requirements, and evaluation criteria among other information.

The successful company shall execute a Professional Services Agreement with the City to perform the services.

One (1) original, two (2) hard copies, and one searchable pdf file less than 10mb in size on USB drive of the proposal shall be submitted to the following address:

City of Santa Paula
City Clerk’s Office
970 E. Ventura Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
Proposal shall include a copy of this form and be signed by the company’s authorized representative.

I have read, understood, and agree to the terms and conditions on all pages of the RFP.

The undersigned agrees to furnish the services stipulated in this RFP.

Company Address

Name (Print) Signature

Company Phone No. Title
MNS Engineers, Inc.
100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Suite 105, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
Brandon Reyes, PE
805.692.6921 Vice President - Transportation
525

CONTENTS
Section 1. Executive Summary 1
Section 2. Company Profile and Experience 3
Section 3. Staffing Plan 13
Section 4. Existing and Past Financial Relationships 17 Section 5. Why Select the MNS Team 19
Section 6. Scope of Work 21
Appendix A. Resumes A-1
Appendix B. Agreement Exceptions B-1
0 Contents
526
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 527

1.Executive Summary
1 SECTION
Executive Summary
528
SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
Firm Qualifications
About MNS Engineers, Inc.

MNS Engineers, Inc. (MNS)
Firm Type C-Corporation incorporated in CA
Year
Founded
1962
Point of
Contact
Michael Ip, PE, QSD
Project Manager
805.391.0415 mobile
[email protected]
Corporate
Office
201 N. Calle Cesar Chavez
Suite 300
Santa Barbara, CA 93103
805.692.6921 Office/Fax
www.mnsengineers.com
Local Office
100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard
Suite 105
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
805.692.6921 Office/Fax
As a local, California mid-size business,
MNS offers a proven depth of resources
and services that allows us to deliver
superior quality and service. Established in
1962, MNS provides quality infrastructure
consulting services to the transportation,
water resources, and government service
markets throughout California. Specializing
in the core services of engineering,
planning, construction management, and land
surveying, MNS' reputation has been built on clear and
direct communication and quality services.

Bikeway Improvement Design
MNS has an extensive history of successful bikeway
improvement projects. Projects have included
intersection improvements, roadway extensions, traffic
signal installation and/or modifications, enhanced
traffic safety measures and treatments, railroad
improvements, pavement rehabilitation, levee, storm
drain and stormwater treatment improvements, water
and sewer improvements, and utility relocation. As
part of the project, pedestrian facilities such as curb ramps, sidewalks and driveways are evaluated and
reconstructed to meet the American with Disabilities
Act (ADA) Standards. From concept inception through
project completion, we support our clients every step of the way.

Our engineering and technical teams stay current with
material and construction method developments as well
as public agency specification and code requirements.

We offer in-depth project experience and a high level of engineering design skill. We cover design services for all project phases:
• Preliminary engineering studies
• Preparation of contract documents—plans,
specifications, and estimates (PS&Es)
• Plan check and peer review
Section 1. Executive Summary 1
529
2 SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Coordination with project stakeholders and utilities
• Pre-bid and bid phase assistance
• Permitting with counties, cities, Caltrans, and other regulatory agencies
• Environmental regulations and permitting
• Requirements for funding from federal, state, and local resources
• Cost estimating
Project Understanding
The City of Santa Paula is seeking an experienced
consulting firm to prepare design drawings,
specifications, and bid documents for the Community
Bike Trail Connectivity Project. The project will improve pedestrian connectivity throughout the City from the
west end of town to the east end. The City has identified three possible extensions that MNS is prepared to
explore.

We understand the City's goals include:
• Enhancing safety in the City's transportation corridors, with many innovative engineering approaches now
available to improve non-motorized safety.
• Increasing bicycling/walking activity, as it serves as a springboard that enables widespread benefits (e.g.,
roadway markings, wayfinding).
• Expanding recreational opportunities and enhancing
quality of life by permitting greater access to scenic
public lands and offering more ways to enjoy the
outdoors.
• Advancing public health initiatives as these activities are requisite to reversing the obesity trend among the
City’s residents as well as high cardiovascular rates.
• Providing transportation equity, with social and
educational opportunities further realized through the
provision of safe non-motorized access to schools/
learning centers, and by constructing bicycle/
pedestrian facilities in struggling neighborhoods with
low-income populations.
• Maximizing transportation investments since the
efficacy or bicycle/pedestrian networks are optimized
by the addition of strategic local connections.
• Improving the regional economy because bicycle and
pedestrian facilities create access to jobs for much
of the local region and beyond. Bike infrastructure
has been shown to attract a highly educated working
class, which would in turn help with building and
growing new businesses within the City of Santa Paula.
530

2. Company Profile and

SECTION
2 Experience
Company Profile and
Experience
531
SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE 3
2 Section 2. Company Profile and Experience
Company Profile
Established in 1962, MNS Engineers, Inc. (MNS) provides quality infrastructure consulting services to the
transportation, water resources, and government service markets throughout California. Specializing in the core services of engineering, construction management,
planning, and land surveying, MNS' reputation has been
built on clear and direct communication and quality
services. We understand the technical, environmental,
and regulatory aspects that may be required for any
project. We are experienced and knowledgeable with
bikeway improvement projects and multi-agency
coordination.

Firm Background
MNS is the result of the 1980 merger of Martin and
Northart, Inc., US Grant & Sons, Inc., and Spencer
Engineering, Inc. Merging these well-established
Santa Barbara engineering firms created a diversified
professional service corporation with unique capabilities to serve public and private clients. Headquartered in
Santa Barbara, California, MNS has additional branch
offices in Thousand Oaks, Antioch, Buellton, Oakland, San Bernardino, San Jose, San Luis Obispo, and Riverside.

Subconsultant Profiles
MNS has supplemented our in-house expertise with the
addition of the following highly qualified consultants.

Pacific Coast Land Design (PCLD)
PCLD is an award-winning full-service landscape
architecture firm that has been serving regional
municipalities since the firm’s inception in 1983. PCLD is experienced in working with many regional jurisdictions, which allows them the ability to be a bridge between
the municipalities and the agencies they serve, and the communities they design with. Working within these
shared spaces as designers and client representatives,
PCLD creates client-specific strategies by combining a
varied knowledge base, keen sense of place, and existing relationships. PCLD’s clients have included:
• City of Santa Paula (PH 1 SPBL Trail, current City OnCall) • Ventura County Transportation Commission (grant
services, ATP 6, and SCAG/REAP 2.0)
• City of Ventura Public Works/Transportation (design/
implementation, grants, and project facilitation for
various trails including the Caltrans Clean California
Local Grant Program [CCLGP] and ATP 6)
• City of Oxnard Public Works (project design and
implementation for an urban greening multimodal
alley improvements project)
• City of Santa Clarita (design/implementation services for downtown corridors, community gateways, and
vehicular corridors)
Most recently PCLD has supported the Santa Paula
Unified School District in the CALFIRE "Green Schoolyards" Grant Program in application assistance for a $10M
award across three school campuses and are leading
the subsequent design and construction process.

Earth Mechanics, Inc. (EMI)
EMI is a geotechnical engineering consulting company
founded as a California Corporation in February
1989. The firm specializes in major geotechnical
site investigations and testing, seismic hazard and
earthquake retrofit evaluations, and foundation design
for projects related to transportation infrastructure. EMI has planned, coordinated and conducted geotechnical
field investigations for numerous local, regional and
state funded projects that included pavement condition
survey and pavement rehabilitation, and design and
construction recommendations for rigid and flexible
pavement sections. EMI has provided geotechnical
design services for structural pavement design following the procedures outlined in the California Highway Design Manual including the Caltrans online flexible pavement
design software; CalFP and CalME. EMI has also provided design recommendations for locally funded projects
532
4 SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE
using local pavement design methodology, plans
and specifications. EMI is familiar with material and
construction specifications provided in both Caltrans
Standard Specification and the Greenbook.

EMI has provided geotechnical services on active
transportation projects such as:
• OC Loop O, P, & Q – Coyote Creek Channel Bikeway in
Orange and Los Angeles Counties
• Santa Ana River Bikeway and Trail in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties
• Pacific Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements
Project in Jurupa Valley
• Bayshore Bikeway in San Diego;
• Las Flores Creek Pedestrian Bridge in Malibu as a
subconsultant to MNS
With a staff of 38, EMI has offices located throughout
California. The headquarters is in Fountain Valley in
Orange County. Other offices are in Corona, San Marcos, Hayward, and San Bernardino. For this contract, work
will be done from the Fountain Valley office, which has a Caltrans-certified soil testing laboratory and rock
laboratory.

Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre)
Padre is a multidisciplinary consulting firm serving a
diverse clientele including public agencies, industry,
and private enterprises in the fields of environmental
sciences and geoenvironmental services. Padre provides
a broad range of environmental and geoenvironmental
services for large scale regional projects to small scale localized projects. Recent similar projects include:
• Hillcrest Drive Bike Lane and Pedestrian Improvements, City of Thousand Oaks
• Westside Bike and Pedestrian Improvements, City of
Ventura
• Conejo School Road/Willow Lane Sidewalk and Bicycle
Lanes, City of Thousand Oaks
• Randall Road Debris Basin EIR, Santa Barbara County
Flood Control District
• Marie Kerr Park and Ride Parking Lot Improvements,
City of Palmdale
• Mulholland Highway Safety Improvements, City of
Calabasas
TJW Engineering, Inc. (TJW)
Established in 2010, TJW, a California Corporation, is
a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) consulting firm that
specializes in traffic and lighting engineering and
transportation planning services. The professionals
at TJW have designed and performed hundreds of
traffic and lighting engineering design plans and
transportation planning studies for a variety of private and public sector clients including architects, civil
engineers, commercial and residential developers,
school districts, community associations, cities, counties, and public agencies.

TJW has supported MNS on the following projects:
• Rancho Conejo Biotech Area Sidewalk Project, City of
Thousand Oaks
• Conejo School Road/Willow Lane Sidewalk and Bicycle
Lanes, City of Thousand Oaks
• Hillcrest Drive (Yellen Park) Sidewalk Improvements,
City of Palmdale
• Marie Kerr Park and Ride Parking Lot Improvements,
City of Palmdale
• El Segundo Boulevard Improvements, City of El
Segundo
• West Calabasas Road Improvements, City of
Calabasas
533
SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE 5
MNS Project Experience
MNS is well versed in preparing design drawings,
specifications, and bid documents for projects similar in nature to the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project.

The following projects highlight our relevant experience.

Dockweiler Drive Extension
Client City of Santa Clarita
Reference
Contact
Carla Callahan, Senior Engineer
661.286.4130
[email protected]
Dates 2019—current
This $30M Secondary Arterial—Dockweiler Drive from
Sierra Highway to Railroad Avenue—will provide an
important north-south connection for the city, a new
entrance to the Master’s University, and a secondary
emergency access point for the Placerita Canyon
community. The roadway extension and widening will go
through an existing railroad crossing, business district, hilly terrain, and the Master’s University property.

MNS is providing preliminary and final design
engineering services. Preliminary engineering services
include traffic modeling, roundabout analysis and
simulation, renderings, intersection, and roadway and
bikeway alternatives. Final engineering services include roadway, bike lanes, bike path, shared-use path bike
bridge over Newhall Creek and roundabout design,
traffic calming, at-grade railroad crossing and Metro/
SCRRA/PUC permitting, traffic signals, bus stops, street lighting, landscaping, 0.5 mile of new storm drain
system and stormwater treatment (including detention
basins, infiltration trenches, and bioretention areas), Los Angeles County Flood Control District and Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works permitting, mass
grading, environmental permitting, and extensive public outreach.

Railroad Avenue Bike Trail
Client City of Santa Clarita
Reference
Contact
Carla Callahan, Senior Engineer
661.286.4130
[email protected]
Dates 2015—2022
This project prepared the conceptual design report for
the proposed Class I bicycle trail along the east side of Railroad Avenue. The main goal of the project was to
perform the preliminary engineering and understand
the environmental constraints of the proposed
improvements so the project can better compete for
project funding opportunities.

The facility is proposed to be located between Railroad Avenue and the Metrolink Railroad, extending North/
South between Lyons Avenue and Oak Ridge Drive.

The majority of the proposed bicycle trail is within
Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (MTA) R/W.

The improvements will be tucked as close as possible
to Railroad Avenue within the existing Metrolink R/W
to maximize railroad setback and to satisfy the lateral clearance of bicycle paths to a high-speed arterial
(Railroad Avenue). The bicycle trail will then connect
to the existing sidewalk and Los Angeles County Flood
Control District (LACFCD) maintenance access road
adjacent to Oakridge Drive east of Railroad Avenue. The bicycle trail will include Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-mapped cross waterways in three
locations. This will require incorporating two bridge
structures and a box culvert.

Design coordination and requirements included
Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA),
Caltrans, LACFCD, and City of Santa Clarita's Landscape Maintenance District Standards.
534
6 SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE
Santa Claus Lane Class I Bike Path and Roundabout
Client Santa Barbara County Association of
Governments
Reference
Contact
Fred Luna, Director of Project Delivery and
Construction
805.961.8926
[email protected]
Dates 2013—2023
The new 0.8-mile, Class I bikeway and multipurpose path connects Santa Claus Lane to Carpinteria Avenue and
provides a crucial link as part of the California Coastal Trail network. The $12.5M concrete Santa Claus Lane
Class 1 Bike Path runs adjacent to the southbound lanes of US 101 between Estero Street near the Carpinteria
Avenue off-ramp in the City of Carpinteria and Sand
Point Road in the County. It is located on the beach side of US 101 between the freeway and the railroad tracks.

Pedestrians and bicyclists can now walk and ride
between the City of Carpinteria and Santa Claus Lane, a popular beach and local business area in the County of
Santa Barbara.

Improvements were also made to the intersection of
Estero Street and Carpinteria Avenue with updates for
the multipurpose path connections and crosswalks.

A new vehicular turnaround was built at the northern
terminus of the bike path to improve access to the
bikeway and to provide a safe and legal location for
Santa Claus Lane traffic to turn around without entering the freeway. This feature was brought into the bike path project early due to the close coordination needed with Caltrans for construction, and to reduce construction
and traffic impacts during construction.

The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments
(SBCAG) led the project with extensive collaboration and multi-jurisdictional coordination with many stakeholders including Caltrans, County of Santa Barbara, City of
Carpinteria, State of California, Union Pacific Railroad, Land Trust for Santa Barbara County, California Coastal Commission, California Department of Fish & Wildlife,
and Army Corp of Engineers.

MNS provided project management, transportation
engineering, development of alternatives, alternatives
analysis, project report, and design standard decision
document (DSDD), traffic safety system guidance (TSSG)
exception approval, intersection control evaluation
(ICE) and many other design documents to support the
project. MNS also provided survey services.
2023 APWA CC Project of the Year - Transportation
Silver Award
Conejo School Road and Willow Lane
Sidewalk and Bike Lanes Project
Client City of Thousand Oaks
Reference
Contact
Mike Tohidian, Senior Engineer
805.449.2516
[email protected]
Dates 2017–2022 (Conejo)
This $4.7M project designed approximately 1.1 miles of
pedestrian and Class II bicycle lane facilities on Conejo School Road and Willow Lane between Hillcrest Drive and Hampshire Road. Services included preliminary and final design, environmental document, public outreach, and
R/W property easements for roadway widening,
retaining walls, driveway reconstruction, sidewalk and
sidewalk infill construction, bicycle and traffic lane
striping and markings, curb ramp construction and
reconstruction, pedestrian signals, landscaping,
pavement rehabilitation, water facility upgrades, storm drain improvements, and stormwater treatment facilities (infiltration trench and bioswales).

A Caltrans Encroachment Permit was obtained for
design and construction activities as the Conejo School 535
SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE 7
Road travels under the US 101. Minimizing the impact
on private property owners when obtaining permanent
and temporary construction easements was critical
since coordination and acquisition of easements drove
the project schedule. Due to the Active Transportation
Program (ATP) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding for the project, all R/W acquisition
followed federal guidelines.
2022 Ventura County APWA Project of the Year
Hillcrest Drive Bike Lane and
Pedestrian Improvements
Client City of Thousand Oaks
Reference
Contact
Masoud Razavi, PE, Engineering Associate
805.449.2454
[email protected]
Dates 2023–current
Hillcrest Drive is an arterial roadway that runs east to west and connects Lynn Road to Moorpark Road. This
road segment is a 1.25-mile portion is a six-lane divided arterial with a raised center median without bike lanes.

The project corridor is one of the main shopping and
business areas.

The city will design and construct bicycle and pedestrian facilities along 1.25 miles of Hillcrest Drive, between Moorpark Road and Lynn Road, with the primary
objective of improving bicyclist and pedestrian safety.

The improvements consist of enhanced bicycle and
traffic lane striping and markings, construction of
incomplete sidewalk segments and retaining walls,
and construction and rehabilitation of curb ramps and
conversion of one travel lane in each direction into Class IV bikeways.

The City of Thousand Oaks secured Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Active
Transportation Project (ATP) grants to fund this project.

MNS is providing preliminary and final engineering
design, public outreach, and R/W property easement.

El Segundo Boulevard Improvements
Client City of El Segundo
Reference
Contact
Cheryl Ebert, PE, Senior Engineer
310.524.2321
[email protected]
Dates 2019–current
El Segundo Boulevard is a major six-lane east-west
arterial with a median from Isis Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). The roadway corridor is mixed with
commercial properties and aerospace campuses. This
$8M project will rehabilitate the existing pavement
throughout the 1.5-mile corridor. The project includes a Class IV bikeway from PCH to Continental Boulevard, and removing existing mature Ficus trees in the median and
developing a landscaped median. El Segundo Boulevard
will require ADA-compliant driveways and curb ramps
and pedestrian crossings at the intersections; six traffic signal modifications; and dedicated bicycle facilities
including bicycle detection. The project will also enhance bicycle safety and rehabilitate the street pavement on
Nash Street (one mile) from Imperial Highway to El
Segundo Boulevard and Douglas Street (two miles) from
Imperial Highway to Rosecrans Avenue. The project will
incorporate stormwater structural Best Management
Practices (BMPs) for the project corridor.

MNS provided design engineering services and currently
provides design support during the construction phase.
536
8 SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE
PCLD Project Experience
Santa Paula Branchline
"Rails with Trails" Grant
Client City of Ventura
Reference
Contact
Jeff Hereford, Principal Transportation
Engineer, Public Works Department
805.654.7744
[email protected]
Dates 2005—2012
PCLD was lead design consultant for the two-mile,
in town portion of the Santa Paula Branchline Trail
that makes use of the VCTC managed rail corridor.

Community engagement, facilitated by PCLD, was key
for the state-funded project in identifying important
connections, amenities that would serve resident
access through town, but also in identifying cultural
and historical resources to be showcased. The resulting trail and series of linked gathering spaces allow users to engage with the City of Ventura’s history and culture through public art pieces such as the Farmworker
Memorial, the St. Francis Dam monument, downtown
murals, and interpretive signage along the trail route. Mill Plaza, located where the trail meets the Ventura County Agricultural museum, is a vibrant outdoor gathering
place that reflects Santa Paula’s unique oil, railroad, and agricultural heritage. Wayfinding and interpretive
signs mounted on rail themed support structures unify
these elements into an attraction for the community
and visitors to the City of Ventura. A planted creek bed features Sycamore shaded boulder seating and misters
that will cool plaza users and summer bikers. A rustic
bridge leads visitors from the permeable parking lot to the renovated ‘Mill Building’ that houses the museum.

The plaza serves as the outdoor event space for the
museum; often hosting live music and dining events.

City of Ventura Santa Paula Branchline
"Rails with Trails" Grant
Client City of Ventura
Reference
Contact
Jeff Hereford, Principal Transportation
Engineer, Public Works Department
805.654.7744
[email protected]
Dates 2022—current
In efforts to complete Ventura’s urban section of the
Santa Paula Branch Line multi-use path, the city is
seeking funding for project design and implementation
through Caltrans ATP Cycle 6 program. This project
closes a gap/deficiency in the current active
transportation network on the east end of Ventura, and
will provide new, safe connections to existing community connection places. The Ventura Rail Trail aims to benefit many pockets of disadvantaged communities along
the Santa Paula Branch Line within Ventura City limits.

In 2022, PCLD was hired to aid the lead consultant in
public outreach necessary for the grant application.

Working with the City of Ventura’s Communications
team, PCLD led an intensive outreach effort targeting
local community councils, special interest groups, and
residents to a virtual community forum, and an online
survey within a tight time frame.

Project Design and Public Outreach. As a result of
the grant application, in 2023 the City of Ventura was
awarded $27M by Caltrans ATP 6 (permitting and
design) and California Transportation Commission's
(CTC) Congested Corridors Program (construction) to
implement the ‘Rails with Trails’ project. PCLD with lead consultant CRA were then awarded the design contract
with PCLD as lead for both the public outreach process
and landscape design. A three-phase, 15+ meeting
effort is well underway to co-create a trail design
with the community that will transform transportation
opportunities from the Montalvo Metrolink Station to the Saticoy Depot.
537
SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE 9
Ventura River Trail Improvements
Client City of Ventura
Reference
Contact
Jeff Hereford, Principal Transportation
Engineer, Public Works Department
805.654.7744
[email protected]
Dates 2021—current
In late 2021, the City of Ventura reached out to PCLD
to assist in an application to the first ever CCLGP.

Initially, PCLD helped identify potential projects that would be competitive. This effort involved identifying
projects, both from within the City’s existing Capital
Improvements Program and from other community
identified improvement priorities. Ultimately, the Ventura River Trail Improvements Project, a 1.85-mile-long stretch of the existing multi-use trail in Ventura’s Westside
neighborhood, was identified as a project that met
existing needs within a grant prioritized disadvantaged community.

In a very brief six-week effort, PCLD took the project from an idea with no documentation support to a 30% design
package, providing all the required grant application
documentation. The major improvements incorporated
include 1.85-miles of trail repaving, over 11,000 linear feet of architectural fencing, and 79 solar powered
lights. The project will also include stormwater BMP
improvements, trail amenities, upgraded connections,
and wayfinding signage. The documentation for the
grant included a project narrative, demonstrated
needs/outcomes assessment, complicated local match
calculation, and an extremely detailed cost estimate.

PCLD also coordinated a brief engagement campaign
that included an outreach meeting, a digital survey,
and an online interactive whiteboard. The successful
engagement garnered greater than 98% support with
over 400 respondents and 19 letters of support from local agencies, non-profits, and political leaders.

In March of 2022, the project was awarded $4,999,188
to continue the project through the design process and
ultimately construct the improvements by the June 2024
grant deadline.

EMI Project Experience
Orange County Loop O, P, Q Coyote Creek Channel
Client Orange County Public Works
Reference
Contact
Brad Fowler, Public Works Project Manager
714.245.4503
[email protected]
Dates 2022—current
The project included 2.7- mile new bikeway along the
Coyote Creek Channel, closing the gap between the
Coyote Creek Channel in Cerritos to La Mirada Boulevard in Buena Park. The project improvements included a
single-span bridge over Coyote Creek, 30-span bridge
over Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), 20-span bridge
over the BNSF Railway (BNSF), ground anchor wall,
soldier/secant pile walls, MSE walls, tub wall, reinforced concrete box (RCB) culvert, BNSF underpass, standard
retaining walls, and new pavement structural sections.

EMI prepared a Preliminary Foundation Report for Type
Selection, conducted a geotechnical field investigation, provided earth pressure recommendations for retaining
walls, provided recommendations for bridges and wall
foundations, provided recommendations for pavement
structural sections in expansive soils, and prepared
Foundation Reports and Geotechnical Report.
538
10 SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE
Las Flores Creek Pedestrian Bridge
Client City of Malibu
Reference
Contact
Shawn Kowalewski, MNS Project Manager
805.456.3540
[email protected]
Dates 2012—2014
The site is located approximately 3.54 miles east of
Malibu City Hall on the north side of PCH. The bridge
crosses over Las Flores Canyon Creek and is located
between Rambla Pacifico Road and Las Flores Canyon
Road, approximately 450 feet north of PCH. The Las
Flores Creek Pedestrian Bridge will connect the visitor parking area on Rambla Pacifico Road to the previously
constructed park amenities on Las Flores Canyon
Road. The bridge provides access accommodations in
compliance with the ADA.

As a subconsultant for the prime firm, MNS, EMI
conducted a field investigation with general geology
and subsurface conditions, a seismic evaluation, an
abutment stability evaluation, and a corrosion study.

EMI prepared a Foundation Report summarizing
the findings and providing design and construction
recommendations for the bridge foundation. EMI also
provided construction support services.

Beach Improvement Group (B.I.G.) Project
California Incline Viaduct, Pier Bridge & Idaho Avenue
Pedestrian Overcrossing
Client City of Santa Monica
Reference
Contact
Zach Pollard, Principal Civil Engineer
310.458.8726
[email protected]
Dates 2014—2018
EMI provided geotechnical input to support preparation
of an EIR and provided geotechnical services during
design and construction of the Beach Improvement
Group (B.I.G.) for the City of Santa Monica. The federal portion of the project included the replacement of the
California Incline Viaduct, evaluation of the feasibility of widening/retrofitting the Pier Bridge and replacement
of the Idaho Avenue Pedestrian Overcrossing the
California Incline. For all three phases of the project, EMI performed field geotechnical explorations, laboratory
soil testing, seismicity and geotechnical evaluations,
and preparation of a technical memorandum. EMI also
provided geotechnical design and construction services
for the non-federal portion of the project, which included the Beacon Overlook platform, rest rooms, and a sign
structure. EMI provided geotechnical and foundation
recommendations during design, reviewed construction
plans, and provided geotechnical services during
construction.

This was a fast-track design project since the City
wanted to use the same contractor working on a nearby
project to minimize the traffic impacts. As a result of EMI’s experience in providing foundation design for
pedestrian bridge projects, the project was completed
in a very short time frame. Also, no claim request was
received by the City from the Contractor regarding
geotechnical conditions/design.
539
SECTION 2. COMPANY PROFILE AND EXPERIENCE 11
Padre Project Experience
Mulholland Highway Safety Improvements
Client City of Calabasas
Reference
Contact
Tatiana Holden, Deputy Public Works
Director
818. 224.1674
[email protected]
Dates 2022—2024
The project consists of improvements to approximately

2.4 miles of Mulholland Highway, including widening
the road shoulder, realigning the roadway centerline
as needed to provide wider shoulders, slope grading
to prevent erosion, slope stabilization improvements, a retaining wall and intersection improvements.

Marie Kerr Park-n-Ride Lot
Client City of Palmdale
Reference
Contact
Harriet Howell, Project Manager
661.267.5304
[email protected]
Dates 2022—2023
The proposed project would provide a new parking
lot with on-site stormwater detention for 1,252 motor
vehicles, which would be occasionally used as a drivein movie theater, with a permanent movie screen to be constructed on the adjacent Palmdale Amphitheater site
immediately west of the parking lot.

Los Feliz Drive Sidewalks
Client City of Thousand Oaks
Reference
Contact
Mike Tohidian, Senior Engineer
805.449.2444
[email protected]
Dates 2020
The purpose of the project is to provide continuous
sidewalks along both sides of Los Feliz Drive, which
involves construction of short segments where sidewalks are not currently present.

TJW Project Experience
Residential Streets, Walkway, Park Lighting Design
(TR20536), City of Ontario
Client Lennar Homes – Inland Division
Reference
Contact
Matthew Gevergiz, Project Manager
951.482.9427
[email protected]
Dates 2023—2024
TJW prepared plans, specifications, and estimates
for a private streets, sidewalks, pathways, parks, and
swimming pool recreational areas as part of a Lennar
Homes residential development in the City of Ontario.

TJW prepared photometric analysis, voltage drop
calculations, circuitry, specifications, and details for a variety of lighting types including concrete street poles, wall mounted fixtures, and bollard style lighting fixtures.

Residential Pathway Lighting Design (TR18916)
City of Ontario
Client KB Home Inland Empire Division
Reference
Contact
Jordan Mastroianni, Forward Planner
334.791.3909
[email protected]
Dates 2023—2024
TJW prepared plans, specifications, and estimates for
a new pathway connecting the residential park areas
to City sidewalk in the City of Ontario. TJW prepared
photometric analysis, voltage drop calculations, circuitry, specifications, and details for a bollard style lighting infrastructure.
540
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 541

3. Staffing Plan

SECTION
3 Staffing Plan
542
SECTION 3. STAFFING PLAN 13
3 Section 3. Staffing Plan
Professional and Qualified Team
The key to a successful project is a highly qualified and well-managed team. We offer the City a cohesive, talented team of licensed and certified professionals and support staff. We work with the following key objectives in mind— quality service and project deliverables, time and budget efficiency, adherence to quality assurance standards, constant communication, and application of technical and practical expertise. This section summarizes proposed key staff experience and qualifications. Resumes are provided in Appendix A.

PROJECT TEAM
Project Engineers
Sam Potts, PE, QSD/QSP
Robert Wilcox, EIT
Principal Surveyor
Shane Sobecki, PLS, EIT

CITY OF SANTA PAULA
Traffic Support
Patrick De Guzman, PE
Public Outreach
Breanne Dunn, ASLA
Landscape Architect
Mike Zielsdorf
Environmental Services
Matt Ingamells
Lighting and Traffic Signal
Thomas Wheat, PE, TE
Geotechnical Services
Alahesh Thurairajah, PE, GE, BC. GE
Principal-in-Charge
Brandon Reyes, PE

MNS ENGINEERS
Project Manager
Michael Ip, PE, QSD
Legend
MNS
PCLD
EMI
Padre
TJW
543
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 544
SECTION 3. STAFFING PLAN 15

PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS

NAME/ROLE FIRM EDUCATION/CERTIFICATIONS YRS
EXP
Brandon Reyes, PE
Principal-in-Charge MNS
• Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 79226
• BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
16 Michael Ip, PE, QSD
Project Manager MNS
• Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 43671
• MS, Construction Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA • BS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 30 Sam Potts, PE, QSD/QSP
Project Engineer MNS
• Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 92519
• Qualified SWPPP Developer and Provider, CA No. 27824
• BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Northridge, CA 9 Robert Wilcox, EIT
Project Engineer MNS • Engineer-in-Training, CA No. 154064 • BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Northridge, CA 9 Shane Sobecki, PLS, EIT
Principal Surveyor MNS
• Professional Land Surveyor, CA No. 9041
• BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico, CA • Engineer-in-Training, CA No. 141294
22 Patrick De Guzman, PE
Traffic Support MNS
• Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 92120
• BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA
9 Breanne Dunn, ASLA
Public Outreach PCLD
• American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)
• Bachelor of Landscape Architecture (BLA), California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA
7 Mike Zielsdorf
Landscape Architect PCLD • Licensed Landscape Architect, California No. 6044 • BLA, California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA 20 Matt Ingamells
Environmental Services Padre
• Certified Ecologist
• MA, Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA • BS, Environmental and Systemic Biology, California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA
42 Thomas Wheat, PE, TE
Lighting and Traffic Signal TJW
• Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 69467
• Professional Traffic Engineer, CA No. 2565
• BS, Civil Engineering, Clemson University, SC
28 Alahesh Thurairajah, PE,
GE, BC. GE
Geotechnical Engineer
EMI
• Geotechnical Engineering, CA No. 3123
• Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 81439
• Board-Certified Geotechnical Engineer, Certificate No. 01457, ASCE • MS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles • BS, Magna Cum Laude, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
15 545
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 546

4. Existing and Past Financial
Relationships

SECTION
4 Existing and Past
Financial Relationships
547
SECTION 4. EXISTING AND PAST FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS 17 4 Section 4. Existing and Past Financial Relationships
MNS has no existing or past financial relationships including agreements between MNS and our proposed subconsultants, with current Members of the City Council and City staff, and entities for which said members are employed, or have an interest, both past and present.
548
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 549

5. Why Select the MNS Team

SECTION
5 Why Select the
MNS Team
550
SECTION 5. WHY SELECT THE MNS TEAM 19
5 Section 5. Why Select the MNS Team
Value of Selecting MNS
The value of our firm's services lies within our complete alignment with the City's goals. We strive for time and budget efficiency, as well as continual progress by
anticipating both common and unique project issues
with the ability to resolve them efficiently. As a result, the City will receive much more than just our high-quality
services:
• Street and Bikeway Design Experience. Our
engineering team is highly experienced in this field.

The MNS team is well versed in the City of Santa Paula
Standard Plans, AASHTO Guide for Development of
Bicycle Facilities, FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide,
AASHTO – Policy of Geometric Design of Highway and
Streets, Caltrans Highway Design Manual, California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD),
“Greenbook” Standard Plans and Specifications for
Public Works Construction (American Public Works
Association), 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards, United States Access Board – Public R/W
Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), Caltrans Design
Information Bulletins 82-06 – Pedestrian Accessibility
and Class IV Bikeway Guidance, and NACTO Urban
Bikeway Design Guide.
• Railroad, Stormwater Treatment, and Flood Control
Design Experience. Our engineering team has
extensive experienced in Ventura County, stormwater
treatment, and flood control facility requirements.

We have coordinated with and obtained Ventura
County Watershed Protection District (VCWPD) Permits.

Standards include City of Santa Paula Standard
Plans, County of Ventura Hydrology Manual, VCWPD
Design Manual, California Public Utilities Commission
General Order (GO) 88-B Modification of an Existing
Rail Crossing, Ventura County Technical Guidance
Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Measures,
and Waste Discharge Requirements and National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4)
Discharges within the Coastal Watersheds of Los
Angeles and Ventura Counties. We have experience
in designing railroad facilities using FHWA Crossing
Handbook, Metrolink (Southern California Regional Rail
Authority) Engineering Standards and Design Manuals,
Federal Railroad Administration Rails with Trails Best
Practices and Lessons Learned. We have obtained
Railroad Permits as well as CPUC GO 88-B approval.
• Responsive Team and Expertise in Key Project Areas.

MNS is known for the staff’s responsiveness as well as
their technical and practical expertise Our proposed
team members have worked together on various
projects of similar scope. Each individual provides
valuable skills which strengthen and enhance the
team as a whole.
• Cost-Effective and Timely Approach. At MNS, our
goal is the same as the City's goal—to complete
project objectives within the City's budget and
schedule. To achieve this shared goal, we will use our
expertise to maintain continuity of the project through communication and complete understanding of the
project's progress, while simultaneously determining
best practices needed to meet and/or exceed the
City's budget and schedule expectations.
• Team Readily Available. Our proposed team is
readily available to support the City's project needs
in a prompt and timely manner. Professional and
responsible, we understand the response time and
availability are important facets to succeed in this
project.
551
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 552

6. Scope of Work

SECTION
6 Scope of Work
553
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 21
6 Section 6. Scope of Work
Project Understanding
Project Background
The City proposes to continue the Santa Paula
Community Bike/Trail to improve pedestrian and bicycle
connectivity throughout the City from the west end of
town to the east end.

This project will include up to 2.5 miles of new bikeways in the City. The project will also explore three possible trail extensions:
• East Side Bike Trail/Pathway extension from the
existing bike trail and connecting to the new 37-
acre regional sports park and the Harvest housing
development east of Santa Paula Creek. The bike trail/
bikeway would traverse over Santa Paula Creek via
planned bridge.
• West Side Bike Trail/Pathway extension from the
existing bike trail/pathway at the intersection of Main Street and N. Peck Road to the City's West End Business Park.

Looking west along Santa Paula Branch Line
• Northern bike trail/pathway extension along the Santa Paula Creek to allow northeast residents to access
the City's wider cycling network and access to key
locations such as the Santa Paula Youth Center and
downtown Santa Paula.

Looking east on Santa Paula Street
The West Side Bike Trail/Pathway will traverse through
the West Telegraph Road/Harvard Boulevard/Main
Street/North Peck Road intersection which operates as
a single traffic signal system with a Santa Paula Branch Line railroad crossing.

Looking east on Telegraph Road towards Harvard
Boulevard
The City intends to begin the project in August 2024 and complete the project work within twelve months to meet
the deadline prescribed by Transportation Development
Act (TDA) Article 3 grant.

Santa Paula Branch Line (SPBL)
Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC)
acquired the SPBL railroad in 1995 to use as a multimodal corridor, including freight rail, bicycle and hiking trail, pipelines and utilities, recreational parks, and to preserve the corridor for possible future commuter rail service. 554
22 SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK
Looking east towards Main Street
In 2000, VCTC adopted a Master Plan and Environmental
Impact Report for the SPBL Recreational Multi-Use Trail.

In December 2021, VCTC executed a Railroad Lease and
Operations Agreement (Agreement) with Sierra Northern
Railway (SNR). Under the Agreement, Sierra Northern is
responsible to operate and maintain the railroad and the R/W. The Agreement defines roles and responsibilities
and grants to Sierra Northern the exclusive rights to
operate the SPBL for Railroad Purposes, including tourist and freight services, film and television production, and storage and transload services.

In April 2022, VCTC renewed its goal to build-out the SPBL trail with a goal to reinvigorate the process to complete the SPBL multi-use path. VCTC initiated an update to
the Master Plan with a focus on connections to housing, employment opportunities, and transit, and an emphasis
on engagement with neighboring landowners, the
agriculture community, disadvantaged communities,
potential future trail users, and the broader community.

The Master Plan Update would incorporate the
recommendations of the SPBL Trail Compatibility Survey
and Federal Railroad Administration’s Best Practices for Rails with Trails.

Santa Paula Creek
Santa Paula Creek is under the jurisdiction of Ventura
County Watershed Protection District.

According to the East Area 1 Specific Plan, the City of Santa Paula obtained a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) in 2001 after improvements were made to the Santa Paula
Creek drainage. The 100-year flood zone associated
with Santa Paula Creek adjacent to the project site is
confined within recently constructed channel banks;
therefore, the area of the 100-year flood zone on the west side of the project site has been eliminated.


<,
<7<
9
:;;:<9


<


<<7<<
<


 !<"#$%&'<(&
)&
*+<")&<-.//01<2<324<56)* 8'%)'*+<")&<-.//01 Figure 4.9-5 East area 1 flood hazard map Per FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map Number
06111C0781F effective April 11, 2024, the existing Santa Creek Levee within the project limits is in Zone X and Zone A99. Zone X is 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard. Zone
A99 designates areas in a community that has made
adequate progress on its construction or reconstruction of a project designed for flood risk reduction.

Portion of FIRM # 06111C0781F Effective date April 11, 2024 Recent City Council Actions
On November 16, 2022, the City Council directed staff to consider a mini-roundabout at the intersection of 12th
Street and Santa Paula Street. The Harvest-Limoneira
development is conditioned to construct a traffic signal due to future increased traffic volumes due to the
construction of the Santa Paula Creek bridge.

On January 24, 2024, the City Council approved the
reallocation of the $553,010 budget from the American
555
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 23
Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) fund to a standalone Peck
Road & Harvard Boulevard Traffic Signal Replacement
Project. This project will be closely coordinated with
the Community Bike Trail Connectivity project and
is anticipated to take approximately 10 months to
complete the design.

On February 13, 2024, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the proposed Offsite Improvement
Agreement with Limoneira Lewis Community Builders,
LLC for construction of the Santa Paula Creek Bridge.

Work Plan
Based on the project understanding, we propose the
following project approach and work plan:

Safe Facility For All Users
Guidance
Project design guidance for pedestrian and bicycle
facilities will come from:
• City of Santa Paula Standard Plans
• Caltrans Design Information Bulletin 82-06 -
Pedestrian Accessibility Guidelines for Highway
Projects
• Caltrans Design Information Bulletin 89-02 Class IV
Bikeway Guidance
• Caltrans Highway Design Manual Section 1000 –
Bicycle Transportation Design
• California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
• Federal Railroad Administration Best Practices for Rails with Trails
• California Public Utilities Commission
• National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway and Street Design
Low-Stress Bicycle Network
As discussed in the FHWA 2019 Bikeway Selection Guide,
a Low-Stress Bicycle Network is one that is designed to be safe and comfortable for all users. A street or bikeway may not be sufficient to provide a safe and comfortable experience for all bicyclists. Only 5 - 9% of the population are comfortable riding in bike lanes or paved shoulders if need be.
13 XSXSPIVEXILMKLIVPIZIPWSJXVEJƤGWXVIWWJSVWLSVXHMWXERGIWXS complete trips to destinations or to avoid out-of-direction travel. -RXIVIWXIHFYX'SRGIVRIH&MG]GPMWX
-RXIVIWXIHFYX'SRGIVRIH&MG]GPMWXWEVIXLIPEVKIWXKVSYT MHIRXMƤIHF]XLIVIWIEVGLERHLEZIXLIPS[IWXXSPIVERGIJSV XVEJƤGWXVIWW8LSWI[LSƤXMRXSXLMWKVSYTXIRHXSEZSMH bicycling except where they have access to networks of
separated bikeways or very low-volume streets with safe roadway crossings. To maximize the potential for bicycling as a viable transportation option, it is important to design bicycle JEGMPMXMIWXSQIIXXLIRIIHWSJXLI-RXIVIWXIHFYX'SRGIVRIH Bicyclist category. This is generally the recommended design ]]
establish a target design user by selecting a target comfort PIZIPJSVXLIFMG]GPIRIX[SVO'SQJSVXERHWXVIWWEVIMRZIVWIP] GSVVIPEXIH)\TSWYVIXSLMKLQSXSVZILMGPIXVEJƤGWTIIHWERH volumes is the primary contributor of stress. High-comfort/lowstress networks serve the most people while low-comfort/highstress networks serve the least.

While the target design user and target comfort level should be selected based on the vision, this critical decision is often overlooked. In such cases, the network typically defaults to WIVZMRK,MKLP]'SRƤHIRXERH7SQI[LEX'SRƤHIRXYWIVWMRE &EWMG&MOI[E]2IX[SVO
EWHIWGVMFIHSRpage 
'SQQYRMXMIW
seeking to serve all ages and abilities will need to establish lowstress bicycle networks. *MKYVI
&MG]GPMWX(IWMKR9WIV4VSƤPIW
2SXI
XLITIVGIRXEKIWEFSZIVIƥIGXSRP]
adults who have stated an interest in bicycling.

To attract bike riders to next phases of the Community
Trail, the facility will need to be:
• Safe
• Secure
• Easily accessible
• Aesthetically pleasing
Ventura County Watershed Protection
District (VCWPD) Permit
The north segment will traverse along the levee of Santa Paula Creek. The proposed improvements will require
coordination, review, approval and an encroachment
permit from VCWPD.

Per our preliminary research, it appears that the existing Santa Paula Creek levees are designed for the 100-year
storm event; therefore, the levees would not have to be improved before installing the proposed bike path.

Green Street Elements
This project will introduce more than 10,000 square feet of new impervious surface; therefore, the project will
need to follow the United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA) guidance regarding Managing Wet
Weather with Green Infrastructure: Green Streets
(December 2008 EPA-833-F-08-009) to the maximum
extent practicable.

Green street elements may include permeable
pavement, bioretention curbs, sidewalk planters and/or
sidewalk trees. The type of underlying soil will need to be considered as the City's native soils are usually clayey which will have low soil infiltration rates.
556
24 SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK
Railroad Coordination and Permit
The proposed bikeway will need to cross over the SPBL
railroad tracks in the west and east segments. On the
West segment, the railroad concrete panel will need
to be expanded on the east side of North Peck Road to
allow a two-way bike riders to cross over the SPBL tracks and cross North Peck Road north of the existing railroad crossing. On the East segment, the proposed bikeway
will remain on 12th Street; therefore, railroad crossing improvements will not be needed.

For the proposed railroad improvements, we will need to obtain a VCTC Railroad Permit, SNR review and approval
and a CPUC GO-88B approval.

Aesthetics
The Community Trail will be the City’s main east-west
non-motorized corridor. To attract users, the trail will need to be aesthetically pleasing. This entails installing landscaping and trail furniture which blends in with
the environment. The improvements need to be low
maintenance.

To ensure that aesthetics will meet the City’s
expectations, MNS has teamed with PCLD who designed
the amenities in Phase 1 of the Community Trail.

Amenities included benches, shelters, drinking fountains, trash cans, pet bag dispenser, maps, signage, and
lighting.

Utility Facilities
Both railways and streets have many underground
utilities. Telecom companies tend to use the railroad R/W as their communication line corridor. Within the SPBL
R/W, petroleum line markers are present north and south of the railroad tracks. The City’s sewer system traverses under the railroad R/W.

In general, the bike trail/path improvements should
have minimal impacts to underground facilities as
the pavement section will be less than a foot, and
the trail/path will follow the existing terrain to avoid impeding the natural drainage pattern. If the project
incorporates permanent stormwater treatment facilities
like bioretention areas, we will need to ensure that
underground utilities are not underneath these areas.

Project Segment Considerations
This project has three distinctive project segments which will have differing criteria.

West Segment
Most of the west segment improvements will be in the
SPBL railroad R/W. The project will need to follow the
Federal Railroad Administration’s Best Practices for Rails with Trails. Design considerations include:
• Setback. Maximum distance to minimize impacts the
existing and future railroad tracks and operations.
• Separation. Natural or constructed to maintain safety and prevent trespassing. Barriers include fencing,
vegetation, grade separation, ditches, and concrete
walls.
• At-Grade Crossing. Factors include train frequency
and speed, crossing surface, sight distance, approach
angle and grade, warning devices, and lighting.
• Drainage. Design to keep water away from tracks and
ballast structure.
• Lighting. Dependent on safety, visibility, installation, maintenance and operation cost, and neighbor
impact.

Since most of the businesses and residential
communities are located to the north of SPBL, the
preferred location of the bike path would be to the north of the SPBL track to allow access from Lindsay Lane to
the bike path and avoid crossing the railroad tracks.

Looking east towards Lindsay Lane
Because a gas line is located north of the railroad tracks, we will need to confirm the location and depth of the gas line.
557
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 25
Looking west – existing gas line marker
The complexity of this segment is at the five-legged
intersection of Telegraph Road, Harvard Boulevard, N.

Peck Road and Main Street. The SPBL runs through this
intersection as well.

The design goal should be to decrease the conflicting
bike/vehicle/railroad movements at this intersection.

Exhibit 1 shows a schematic layout to cross the
Community Trail users at Sheppard Road to avoid the
North Peck Road/Harvard Boulevard intersection. The
north side of Telegraph Road has excess R/W to provide
a two-way bike path. The bike path would continue
north of the SPBL and cross North Peck Road north of the railroad crossing. From the east side of North Peck Road, the bike riders will cross over the SPBL track and connect to the existing Community Trail.

Bike movements will need to be phased in with the
five-legged intersection. We will coordinate closely with the City’s Design Consultant for the North Peck Road &
Harvard Boulevard Traffic Signal Replacement Project
to ensure the bicycle/pedestrian movements are
accounted for efficiently at the intersection.

East Segment
As presented in the RFP project location map, this
segment will continue the Community Trail from North
12th Street and continue east on Santa Paula Street to
the planned bridge over Santa Paula Creek.

Looking south on 12th Street
To offer more separation from vehicles, the project
could provide a two-way cycle track or shared use path
on 12th Street and Santa Paula Street. The cycle track
could be placed at the street or sidewalk level. North 12th Street is a two-lane facility with approximately 40 feet in width. Without street parking, North 12th Street should have adequate space for a dedicated bike facility. At the intersection of 12th Street and Santa Paula Street, we will look to provide traffic calming measures as the Barbara Webster Elementary School is located on the northwest
corner, and many industrial businesses are situated on
the south side of Santa Paula Street. From 12th Street
to Santa Paula Creek, Santa Paula Street is a two-lane
facility with approximately 50 feet in width. A two-way cycle trackshared path could be provided without
eliminating all street parking.

As discussed in the project understanding, the 12th
Street/Santa Paula Street intersection will be improved by the developer due to future increased traffic volumes.

The East Area One Project EIR Traffic Study provides
Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Peak-Hour Traffic
Volumes. The City's General Plan shows 12th Street and
Santa Paula Street to be designated truck routes. We will coordinate with the developer engineer and consider
the truck as the design vehicle for the intersection
improvements.

Exhibit 2 shows the street section options on Santa Paula Street. As we evaluate the location of the bikeway, we will look to minimize the number of potential conflicts with vehicle movements. Exhibit 3 depicts a bike trail/path
option at the 12th Street/Santa Paula Street intersection. 558
26 SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK
North Segment
This segment will be located mainly within the VCWPD
R/W and jurisdiction; therefore, all improvements will
need to reviewed and approved by VCWPD. We assume
the bike path/trail will be located on the Santa Paula
Creek levee which is also the VCWPD maintenance
access road so landscaping and signage will be limited.

With that said, there may opportunities for trailhead
aesthetics at northerly end and at the Limoneira's Santa Paula Creek bridge. We will coordinate with City staff and the developer to see what can be implemented at the
beginning and the end of the trail.

We have provided a project overview in Exhibit 4 which
shows the design elements and issues for this project.

Public Outreach
The City Council has expressed interest in the type of
vertical barrier that will be implemented on the project.

Because this segment of Hillcrest Drive is adjacent to
shopping and business destinations for City and County
residents, the project may draw some public interest.

As part of this project, we will provide concept layout, exhibits, and renderings in support of the project.

City of Thousand Oaks Project – Public Outreach
Both MNS and PCLD have extensive experience
supporting Cities in their public outreach including
public presentations, workshops and renderings. Since
PCLD led the Community Engagement activities in Phase
1 of the Community Trail project, we proposed to have
PCLD continue to lead this task with MNS’ support.

Project Budget
MNS will provide project cost estimates through the
design process so that the City is apprised of the
construction cost. We always review current cost and
bid climate to provide realistic project cost estimates.

MNS can make design adjustments to the proposed
improvements to keep the construction cost in line with the City’s project budget during the design process.

Per VCTC's 2023 Federal Transportation Improvement
Program, the City has $405K and $1.482M for design and
construction respectively.

With the limited design budget, the project could
consider the following:
• Use available City topographic and aerial mapping
during the schematic phase and perform final design
level survey and mapping when the City decides on
which segment to final design.
• Continue with the existing landscape and aesthetic
elements in Phase 1 with except of improvements that
did not work or required improvement.

Project Schedule
MNS has a track record of delivering projects on
schedule. With our numerous experiences in bike and
pedestrian improvement projects, we will anticipate
potential critical path issues such as railroad permits, Ventura County Watershed Protection District (VCWPD)
encroachment permits, utility relocation and R/W
coordination.

Scope of Work
Task 1 Project Management
TASK 1.01 Project Management
MNS will coordinate the work of the project team
including representatives from the Public Works
Department and the City Manager’s Office. We will
facilitate regular project progress meetings and provide monthly written updates on the Project status and
budget.

Deliverables: Monthly project updates
TASK 1.02 Project Kick-Off Meeting
At the commencement of the Project, MNS will facilitate a kick-off meeting with the City’s staff to discuss the scope and parameters of the Project. We will prepare
559
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 27
and distribute a draft agenda in advance of the meeting for review and comment by the City. We will prepare and distribute meeting minutes within three business days
of the meeting. We assume two hours for the kick-off
meeting with staff members.

Deliverables: Kick-off meeting agenda and minutes
TASK 1.03 Progress Meeting
MNS will attend monthly meetings at the City for the
duration of the project. As part of the effort, we will be responsible for developing meeting information and
agenda prior to the meeting and meeting minutes within
three business days following the meeting with complete action tracking log. We will assume two hours for each
meeting.

Deliverables: Meeting agenda and minutes
TASK 1.04 Project Schedule
MNS will develop a project schedule at the beginning
of the project that covers preliminary design,
recommendations, design drawings, specifications,
construction cost estimate, bid documents, and bid/
award support services. Project schedule will be
submitted with the proposal and will be updated within
two weeks of the kick-off meeting.

Deliverables: Project schedule in Microsoft Project
TASK 1.05 Project Communication
MNS will develop a communications protocol to be
followed by all team members to be submitted within
one week of starting the project. Communication
protocol will include standard project communication
as well as emergency communication protocols. All
communication through bid and construction phase
services shall be conducted through the City and not
directly with the bidders/contractor.

Deliverables: Project communication protocol
TASK 1.06 Project Coordination
MNS will coordinate all services of subconsultants
including site visits, site inspections, and will ensure coordination with the City staff and other interested
parties as outlined by the City.

TASK 1.07 Monthly Invoicing
MNS will submit invoices on a monthly basis with all
supporting documentation in a format acceptable to
the City. Invoices requiring amendment shall be dated
according to when the revised invoice is delivered to
the City. Invoices shall be delivered electronically to the Project Manager and to [email protected].

Deliverables: Monthly invoices
Task 2 Data Gathering, Site Visit, and
Preliminary Investigations
We will review and assess existing data and reports
relative to the project and conduct necessary site
visits, investigations and analyses required to identify and mitigate project issues that could impact or be
impacted by the project.

TASK 2.01 Data Collection and Site Visit
We will request available record/documents, existing
street, storm drain, wet and dry utility plans, survey
centerline and property monument data, topographic
maps, and drainage and geotechnical reports.

We will review the City’s State TDA Article 3 grant
application to conform scope of work and funding
requirements.

We will perform a site visit.

TASK 2.02 Regulatory, Code and Permitting
Requirements
MNS will review and confirm the regulatory, code and
permitting requirements.
a. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Soil
disturbance for this project will be over 1 acre; therefore, a SWPPP will be required. MNS will prepare a SWPPP
which includes Temporary Water Pollution Control Plans. (General Notes & 6 Plan Sheets). We will work to the City staff to load into SMARTS and file a Notice of Intent.
560
28 SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK
b. Ventura County Watershed Protection District
Encroachment (VCWPD) Permit. The north segment
bike facilities will be in VCWPD jurisdiction; therefore, the project will need to coordinate and meet with
VCWPD and obtain an encroachment permit for these
improvements.

We assume the north segment plan will conform to
VCWPD design and plan requirements and require three
submittals to obtain the permit.

The City will pay fees for plan review and permit fees. c. Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC)
Railroad Permit. The project will need to obtain a
Railroad permit to construct improvements within VCTC
SPBL R/W. We will coordinate and meet with VCTC and
Sierra Northern Railway (SNR). We will prepare permit
application package to SNR/VCTC for review and
approval. We assume three submittals to obtain the
permit.
d. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
General Order (GO) 88-B. At-grade crossing
improvements with VCTC SPBL will require a CPUC GO
88-B. MNS will coordinate with CPUC staff and prepare
the GO-88B Request Form.

We will meet CPUC staff for the on-site diagnostic
meeting to review the proposed changes.

We will update plans based on CPUC comments and
work with the City to submit and obtain approval from
CPUC.

TASK 2.03 Geotechnical Investigation
MNS subconsultant, EMI, will conduct a geotechnical
investigation in support of this project. The scope of
services will consist of the following tasks:
a. Geotechnical Investigation. EMI will collect six surface bulk samples (<5-foot deep); two at each segment.

Three double-ring infiltrometer tests will be performed (one at each segment) in accordance with ASTM D‑3385
utilizing a TurfTec International 24-inch diameter device to measure soil infiltration rates. The 24-inch diameter and 12-inch diameter rings, one inside the other, will be driven into the ground. The rings will be partially filled with water and maintained at constant level. The volume of water added into the outer ring and inner ring to
maintain the constant level will be recorded with time.

Two sets of flow quantity versus time readings will be
taken at the same test location until a trend in flow rate is developed. EMI will prepare a boring location plan and this plan will be used to secure encroachment permit
from the City. Any other permits, if required, will be
secured by others.
b. Soil Laboratory Testing. Soil laboratory tests will be conducted in general accordance with American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards or California Test methods. Anticipated laboratory tests include:

R-value, #200 wash, and Atterberg Limits.
c. Memo Preparation. Based on the R-value and the
Traffic Index (TI) provided by City of Santa Paula, EMI will determine pavement structural sections. EMI will prepare a technical memorandum to provide R-value tests
results, recommended pavement structural sections,
and soil infiltration testing results.

EMI will address any comments resulting from the City's review and prepare a final technical memorandum.

We assume the following:
• Geotechnical Investigation is allowed between 8 AM
and 5 PM on weekdays.
• No investigation of hazardous materials. If hazardous materials are encountered during the geotechnical
field investigation, EMI will terminate our work and
notify the City.
• No retaining walls, sound walls and reinforced culverts. • No permit fees are assumed; well permits are not
required for geotechnical borings or infiltration testing. • Traffic control is not required for the field investigation.

TASK 2.04 Survey and Mapping
MNS will perform field survey and mapping services in
support of the bike trail and roadway improvements.

This scope of work includes an aerial survey, orthophoto creation, and supplemental ground surveys. MNS
will establish new control on the appropriate NAD83
horizontal and NAVD88 vertical datum. The aerial
mapping will incorporate the northern bike trail extension 561
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 29
along the Santa Paula Creek (approximately 0.93 miles).

Supplemental ground surveys will be performed along
the remaining two segments (approximately 1.55 miles).

Cross sections will be surveyed at 100-foot intervals
and detailed surveys will be performed to include rail
facilities, roadway/bridge crossings and applicable
trail connections. These features are more particularly described as follows: hardscape, structures, walls,
fences, drainage structures, trees (6-inch-diameter and above), signs, striping and observable utilities. MNS will prepare a topographic base map in AutoCAD at a scale
of 1 inch=20 feet with 1-foot contour intervals. The scope of work does not include the cost of rail flaggers, rail training, or underground utility location services.

MNS will locate monuments to establish R/W boundaries
within the applicable project limits. Retraced boundaries to include City, County, rail, and any applicable private property boundaries. Retracement will be based on
a best fit of found monuments and record map data.

Research includes all available records from the City
and County of Ventura including any applicable vesting
deeds to define property boundaries. Adjacent property
boundaries and assessor parcel numbers will be shown
per provided County GIS parcel data for reference/
informational purposes. This scope of work does not
include title report acquisition, monument preservation, or filing of a Record of Survey with the County of Ventura.

Deliverables: Topographic mapping and R/W
retracement
TASK 2.05 Utility Investigation
MNS will notify the utility providers (provided from
underground service alert within the project limits)
via letter of the impending project and request atlas
sheets or record drawings of existing utilities and
appurtenances within the project corridor.

Letters will be issued on City letterhead or by MNS as
appropriate. One week following issuance of the request letters, MNS will follow-up with telephone calls to verify that letters were received and to determine when
utility atlas information will be provided. MNS will map the existing utilities onto base line work and provide
reduced-size plans to utility agencies requesting review for conflicts and incorrect mapping of utility atlas
information.

MNS will coordinate with the agencies to confirm design requirements and approval process. Project plans will
be reviewed to determine potential utility conflicts. For unavoidable utility conflicts, MNS will prepare utility relocation notices and project plans highlighting the
conflict. MNS will work with the affected agency to show the proposed utility relocation on the improvement
plans.

Any utility relocation design will be performed by others.

In addition, notices to Utility Owners will be prepared and sent to relocate their facilities. MNS will prepare the required documents for utility clearance issued by
Caltrans.

Deliverables: Utility letters and utility matrix
TASK 2.06 Environmental Impact Analysis
MNS subconsultant, Padre, will prepare required
documents to acquire CEQA environmental clearance.

Final Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative (ND/
MND). Upon approval of the responses to comments,
Padre will incorporate any needed text revisions to the Public Draft ND/MND and prepare the Final ND/MND.

Our cost estimate provides for delivery of up to five
hard copies of the Final ND/MND. In addition, Padre will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring Plan (should mitigation measures be required) for approval with the MND at the
Planning Commission and/or City Council hearing.

Team Meetings and Public Hearings. Our scope includes
attendance at up to three team meetings (in person
as needed) with MNS and/or City staff, and one public
hearing.

Deliverables: Preliminary environmental studies, initial study checklist, draft mitigated negative declaration
(if needed), final mitigated negative declaration (if
needed)
562
30 SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK
Task 3 Community Engagement
The MNS team will develop a public outreach plan
based on PCLD experience in the Phase 1 project to
gain community feedback on the design concepts.

Community outreach and facilitation methods will
account for the multicultural communities and provided
in Spanish and English languages. Public engagement
will include a social media presence.

The outreach plan will include community workshops
and presentations to City Council and City organizations.

We will perform community presentations and include:

TASK 3.01 Kick-off Meeting
At a location and time determined by the City, we will
host a kick-off meeting where we will:
• Review project parameters and discuss public
outreach efforts
• Identify materials needed for the various meetings
outlined below
• Visit the site location
TASK 3.02 Initial Internal Review Meeting
We will attend and lead an Internal Review Meeting
where we will provide three alternative site plans
reflecting the community input and discuss and collect
feedback from City staff.

TASK 3.03 Community Meeting
At a location and time determined by the City, we
will host up to three community meetings to present
alternative site plans (as selected by the City) and
receive feedback.

TASK 3.04 Progress Internal Review Meeting
At the request of the City, we will present an update
on the alternative site plans and feedback received at
previous meetings.

TASK 3.05 Progress Commission Review Meeting/
Presentation
We will conduct presentations of the selected site
plan to the Planning Commission, Parks & Recreation
Committee, and at a City Council meeting.

TASK 3.06 Final Review Meeting/Presentation
We will make a presentation at the Bid Award to the City Council meeting.

Deliverables: Three alternatives, host community
meetings, and presentations
Task 4 Schematic Design
This phase of work will generate a refined site design for the project through an iterative process. Based on the
information gathered during the data collection and
community engagement process, the MNS team will
create a design for the project to include:

TASK 4.01 Design Study Alternatives
The MNS team will prepare two alternatives for the West, East and North segments for the City's review—six total.

The alternatives will be presented in strip maps with
typical sections of the bikeway.

TASK 4.02 Refine Study Alternatives
The MNS team will refine the concept to a final
Schematic Design .

We assume three iterations total to get to final
schematic design. One after each review meeting
outlined in Task 3.

TASK 4.03 Schematic Plans and Specifications
The MNS team will prepare the schematic plans,
specifications, and details and plant materials list.

Plans at 1-inch = 20-feet scale will include:
• Title Sheet
• Typical Sections
• Improvement Layout Plans
563
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 31
• Signing and Striping Plans
• Landscaping Plans
TASK 4.04 Project Team Coordination
The MNS team will coordinate with the City’s project
team for design development, review, and discussion
including creative design workshops.

TASK 4.05 Stakeholder Coordination
The MNS team will coordinate with City staff stakeholders as needed for design development, review, and
discussion.

TASK 4.06 Site Furniture Evaluation
MNS team member PCLD will develop amenities
and building locations with architectural renderings,
including benches, water fountains, locations for public art or kiosks, etc.

TASK 4.07 Landscaping Evaluation
PCLD will determine the planting locations and plant
palettes for native and drought resistant landscaping.

TASK 4.08 Signage Evaluation
MNS will determine the signage requirements and
locations.

TASK 4.09 Irrigation Evaluation
PCLD will identify irrigation needs, feasibility, and
resources available.

TASK 4.10 Lighting Evaluation
MNS subconsultant, TJW, will perform lighting design
fixture selection and location.

TASK 4.11 Stormwater Treatment Evaluation
MNS will Identify locations and feasibility of integration of stormwater infiltration/permeable pavement.

TASK 4.12 Cost Estimating
The MNS team will prepare construction cost estimate
for the proposed improvements.

Deliverables: Schematic design package including one
hard copy of schematic plans, renderings, and palettes
along with electronic versions
Task 5 Design Development
Upon approval and acceptance of the schematic design
and cost, the MNS team will commence with the design
development. This phase of work will refine the design
and identify key construction systems, materials, and
critical coordination issues. We will refine the selected schematic design and identify key construction systems, materials, and critical coordination issues while initiating the PS&E process. We will prepare drawings and data
in AutoCAD and Adobe PDF formats and provide such
drawings and data to the City Project Manager.

TASK 5.01 Renderings
PCLD will prepare perspectives, sketches, and renderings as necessary to indicate the architectural and
landscaping character of the project and its relationship to the pedestrian level, discuss with the project team
and provide to the City Project Manager.

TASK 5.02 Landscape Samples
PCLD will provide samples of proposed vegetation and
related elements, discuss with the project team and
provide to the City Project Manager.

TASK 5.03 100% Design Development Plans (70%
Construction Documents)
The MNS team will prepare 100% design development
plans (70% construction documents).

TASK 5.04 100% Design Development Details
The MNS team will prepare 100% design development
details.
564
32 SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 5.05 100% Design Development Outline
Specifications
The MNS team will prepare 100% design development
outline specifications.

TASK 5.06 100% Design Development Cost Estimate
MNS team will prepare a 100% design development cost
estimate.

TASK 5.07 Coordination and Meeting with Project
Team
We will coordinate the project design and attend
meetings with the Project Team. We assume four
meetings.

Deliverables: The design development package will
include three hard copies of 24-inch x 36-inch plans and specifications along with electronic versions.

Task 6 Final PS&E
TASK 6.01 90% Design
Drawings and specifications from the preliminary
design phase shall be modified to account for design
changes as a result of the design development review.

At the end of the 90% design phase, drawings and
specifications will be complete. The following tasks are to be completed:
• Demolition plans and details
• Landscape architectural drawings and details
• Civil drawings and details (grading and public
improvements)
• Complete specifications
• Construction cost estimate
• Incorporation of all plan check comments from
permitting authorities into the final design submittal
Deliverables: 90% design package including three hard
copies of 24-inch by 36-inch plans and specifications
along with electronic versions
TASK 6.02 Final Design Submittal
During the final design phase, final comments from the
90% design submittal shall be incorporated into the
drawings and specifications. This final submittal will be considered the bid set. Tasks include:
• Production of final architectural and engineering
drawings
• Production of final architectural and engineering
specifications
• The consultant shall prepare an estimate of probable
construction cost for the 100% design package. The
cost estimate shall be transmitted along with the final 100% design package.

Final drawings shall be signed and sealed by a
professional engineer and/or professional landscape
architect registered by the State of California.

Deliverables: Three sets of 11-inch by 17-inch drawings, three sets of 24-inch by 36-inch drawings, four sets of specifications, electronic copy in Adobe PDF format of
the final design package for bid purposes, and design
AutoCAD 2018 or later DWG files.

Task 7 Support During Bidding
The MNS team will provide assistance to the City during the project advertisement and award period. Bid phase
assistance will include the following:

TASK 7.01
Response to requests for information
(RFIs) and requests for clarification
(RFCs)
We will provide a written response to questions within
two business days of questions received during the
bidding period. The responses will be provided in short memorandum format with the question and response
shown.

TASK 7.02 Pre-Bid Meeting
We will attend and participate in the mandatory pre-bid meeting.
565
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 33
TASK 7.03 Addendum/Conform Set
We will incorporate all addenda issued during the bid
period into a conformed set of contract documents. MNS
will provide design support services during the bidding phase.

Deliverables: Responses to RFIs and RFCs, and conform
plan set
Task 8 Construction Phase Services
During construction, the MNS team will include the
following:

TASK 8.01 Pre-construction Meeting
We will attend and participate in the pre-construction
meeting.

TASK 8.02 Project Progress Meeting
We will attend and participate in project progress
meetings as needed by the City with the City and the
Construction Manager to discuss the status of the
Project and potential project issues. We will budget
two hours for each project progress meeting, and one
hour travel time to and from meeting for a total of three hours. We will budget for a 12-month duration for the
construction phase.

TASK 8.03 Submittal Review/RFI Response
We will review all shop drawing and material submittals transmitted by the construction contractor. We will
budget for a total of 20 submittals and a minimum of
three hours for the first review. We will budget assuming 25% of all submittals will require a resubmittal and
additional review with a minimum of 1.5 hours budgeted
for each resubmittal.

We will provide responses to the contractor’s RFIs
and provide clarification of construction documents
regarding drawing interpretation (up to 25 RFIs).

TASK 8.04 Change Order Review
We will review all change order requests submitted
by the construction contractor and make a formal
statement regarding entitlement and the merit of the
contractor’s request. We will budget for three change
order requests to be submitted during the construction
phase. We will budget a minimum of eight hours for
each change order request.

TASK 8.05 Project Close-Out
We will assist in the development of project punch
lists and coordinate the delivery of all project-related documentation.

TASK 8.06 Record Drawings
We will prepare a record drawing set based on the redline drawings submitted by the construction contractor.

The record drawings shall be prepared using a version
of AutoCAD 2018 or later and shall be transmitted
to the City within 30 calendar days of receipt of the
contractor’s red-line drawings. Electronic copies of
the record drawings shall be submitted to the City in
both AutoCAD and Adobe PDF formats. In addition, the
Consultant shall submit three hard copies of the record drawings on 24-inch by 36-inch bond paper.

Deliverables: Submittal reviews, responses to RFIs,
change order review, punchlist, and record drawings
566
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 567
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 35
N
1 2
2 5
7 7
3 3
4 5
Telegraph Rd
Harvard Blvd
Main St
Peck Rd
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 1
Sheppard Rd
Legend
Bike Path
Curb Buffer (4' Wide)
Curb Extension
Curb Ramp Reconstruction
High Visibility Crosswalk
Railing/Fencing
Intersection Improvements (By
Others)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Exhibit 1. West Segment at Sheppard Road
568
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 569
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 37
Exhibit 2. East Segment Typical Section Options
Figure 1 – Two-Way Cycle Track with Raised Curb Buffer (Stormwater Treatment) Figure 2 – Class IV Bike Lanes with Raised Curb Buffer (Stormwater Treatment) 570
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 571
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 39
N
Santa Paula St
12th St 1
3 3
3 5
1 2
Legend
Two-way Cycle Track with 4' Buffer
(Striped with Bollards or Raised Curb)
Curb Buffer
Curb Ramp Reconstruction
High Visibility Crosswalk
Intersection Improvements (By Others)
1 2
3 4
5 Exhibit 3. Street Section Options on Santa Paula Street 572
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 573
SECTION 6. SCOPE OF WORK 41
Exhibit 4. Project Overview
574
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 575
A
Appendix A. Resumes

APPENDIX
Resumes
576
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-1
A Appendix A. Resumes
Name Role PG
Brandon Reyes, PE Principal-in-Charge A-3
Michael Ip, PE, QSD Project Manager A-5
Sam Potts, PE, QSD/QSP Project Engineer A-7
Robert Wilcox, EIT Project Engineer A-9
Shane Sobecki, PLS, EIT Principal Surveyor A-11
Kyle Turner, PE Senior Structural Engineer A-13
Breanne Dunn, ASLA Public Outreach A-15
Mike Zielsdorf Landscape Architect A-17
Matt Ingamells Environmental Services A-19
Thomas Wheat, PE, TE Lighting and Traffic Signal A-21
Alahesh Thurairajah, PE, GE, BC. GE Geotechnical Services A-23 Resumes
577

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
578
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-3
Brandon Reyes, PE | RESUME PG 1
RESUME
Brandon Reyes, PE
Principal-in-Charge
Firm
 MNS Engineers, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Roadway and intersection design
 Geomatics
 Design strategy
 Multidisciplinary team management
 Project management
 Caltrans
Years of Experience
 16
Licensing
 Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 79226
Certification
 Caltrans Temporary Pedestrian Access Routes
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona, CA
Mr. Reyes has over 16 years of experience in large
transportation projects involving a breadth of staffing disciplines, Caltrans, agencies, and local governments
throughout California. Brandon has spent his entire
career serving the Inland Empire, including working as a segment lead on the SR-91 Project that went through the heart of Corona. He is a solutions-based professional
engineer who is actively involved in design strategies, schedule and cost adherence management, and quality
assurance. From a project’s inception, Brandon applies a big-picture methodology, allowing him to have a broader project understanding, potential risks and solutions,
involvement and impacts to project stakeholders, and
creative design approaches. Brandon’s project
involvement ranges from conceptual design through to
PID, PA&ED, and PS&E phases throughout his
experience on multiple significant Southern California
projects. His experience includes:

Interstate 10/Jefferson Street Overcrossing County
of Riverside, CA. Project Manager. Brandon was
responsible for the day-to-day management of the
contract and design support efforts for the construction phase of the project, representing the design team and
working with his multidisciplinary design team and the
construction manager through the complex interchange
construction in collaboration with the Caltrans RE and
Inspection team. The modifications included the
replacement and relocation of the Jefferson
Street/Interstate 10 overcrossing, additional loop onramps, and realignment of Jefferson Street. In PA&ED, he coordinated the alternative analysis and design,
roadway design, traffic studies, drainage studies, and
structure advance planning studies. Also coordinated the revisions to all of the project documents, and circulation of the environmental document; in coordination with
FHWA, Caltrans, the County of Riverside, and the City of Indio.

Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Interchange, County of
Riverside, Calimesa, CA. Project Manager. Brandon
was responsible for the day-to-day management of the
contract and development of the PSR-PDS deliverable
and supporting documentation for interchange
improvements that require full reconfiguration. Various challenges at the interchange have resulted in three
viable build alternatives in the PID phase: Partial
cloverleaf, roundabouts, and diverging diamond
alternatives. Alternative geometry, scoping, cost
estimation, and initial studies are under development to finalize the project initiation document. Currently working 579
A-4 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Brandon Reyes, PE | RESUME PG 2
RESUME
on the execution of PA&ED phase. Brandon led the
multidisciplinary team solving key environmental issues associated with the project including biological resources, noise, cultural and air quality. He also led the design of Geometric Approval Drawings (30%) of a DOI type
interchange working with the Caltrans District 8 oversight team.

State Route 60/Archibald Avenue Interchange, San
Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA), CA. Project Manager (PA/ED AND PS&E) and
Project Engineer (PSR/PDS). Brandon was responsible
for day-to-day management of the contract and
development of the PSR-PDS deliverable, execution of
the PA&ED phase, and the PS&E deliverable package.

One key element was working with Caltrans in every
phase of the project to carefully plan construction staging that maintained local business operations along
Archibald Avenue. There were several utility conflicts
identified on the project, which involved careful
coordination and design in collaboration with SCE, SCG, Frontier, and Charter. Brandon worked closely with the
City of Ontario on aesthetics, lighting, and traffic
circulation impacts. He also led the project team as
contract/project manager from PA/ED through
construction support of the interchange, which was
completed in the Spring of 2022.

Interstate 15 Corridor Freight and Express Lanes,
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA), CA. Project Manager. Brandon was
responsible for day-to-day management of the contract
and project delivery with SBCTA, including direct
interface with Caltrans District 8, RCTC, and various rail authorities. Management activities included staff
selection and assignment, subconsultant invoice review, invoicing and progress reporting with SBCTA, and
managing overall project performance related to
schedule and budget. Overseeing a team of 50+
engineers across all design disciplines within a traditional PS&E delivery phase (roadway, traffic, drainage,
landscape, MOT, ITS, electrical, structures, and
broadband) which was completed in Fall of 2023.

Project Initiation Document On-Call I Riverside
County, Caltrans District 8, CA. Task Order Manager.

Brandon managed multiple task orders under this on-call, including Task Orders 6 (SBD- 18 Drainage), 9 (PIR for
Bridge Scour Mitigation), and 10 (PIR for Asset
Management Mobility on Interstates 15 and 215 and
State Routes 60, 63, 91, and 111). He oversaw each task order including leading the multidiscipline teams that
prepared the PSR-PDS, Preliminary Environmental
Assessment Report (PEAR) and varying reports in the
PIO phase, which scoped and programmed projects
through planning, design and construction. He
accomplished completion of these tasks by leading
PDTs, directing multidisciplinary teams and coordinating across Caltrans units to solicit feedback on various
elements and assumptions within each project. In a
subconsultant role, Michael Baker provided on-call PID
services for various task orders in accordance with
Caltrans policies and standards.

Brandon Reyes, PE | RESUME PG 2
580
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-5
Michael Ip, PE, QSD | RESUME PG 1
RESUME
Michael Ip, PE, QSD
Project Manager
Firm
 MNS Engineers, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Bikeway, roadway, highway, and interchange design
 Construction and project management
 Transportation planning
 Traffic engineering
 Drainage and flood control facilities
 Caltrans
Years of Experience
 30
Licensing
 Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 43671
Certification
 Qualified SWPPP Developer, CA No. 43671
Education
 MS, Construction Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA
 BS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA Affiliations
 American Council of Engineering Companies
 American Public Works Association
 American Society of Civil Engineers
Awards
 2022 APWA Project of the Year, Conejo School Road and Willow Lane Sidewalk and Bike Lanes Project
 2020 APWA Project of the Year, Thousand Oaks
Boulevard Streetscape
 2019 APWA Project of the Year, Westlake Boulevard
(State Route 23) Sidewalk and Bicycle Lane
Improvements Project
 2017 APWA/ASCE Project of the Year, Donlon Road
Realignment
 2017 ACEC Engineering Excellence Merit, Colorado
Esplanade
 2012 APWA Project of the Year, California State
University Channel Islands Entrance Road Improvements
 2010 ACEC Engineering Excellence Merit, Fillmore Water Recycling
Mr. Ip is a Project Manager and Principal Engineer with 30 years of experience specializing in the design and
management of transportation facilities and capital
improvement projects. Michael’s technical experience
includes all project phases, including project reports, planning, design, and construction management. His
management experience includes oversight and direction
of technical professionals, client liaison, quality control, subconsultant coordination, public outreach and
resources allocation to ensure the timely delivery of
project deliverables. His experience includes:

Dockweiler Drive Extension, City of Santa Clarita,
CA. Project Manager. The City of Santa Clarita proposes to construct a $30M Secondary Arterial—Dockweiler
Drive from Sierra Highway to Railroad Avenue. The
project will provide an important north-south connection for the City, a new entrance to Masters University, and a secondary emergency access point for the Placerita
Canyon community. The roadway extension and
widening will go through an existing railroad crossing, business district, hilly terrain, and the Master’s University property. Preliminary engineering services include
community outreach, traffic modeling, roundabout
analysis and simulation, intersection, and roadway and
bikeway alternatives. Final engineering services include roadway, design following LACDPW LID Standards
Manual, bikeway and roundabout design, traffic calming, railroad crossing and permitting, traffic signals, street lighting, landscaping, drainage and stormwater treatment (including detention basins, infiltration trenches, and bioretention areas), mass grading, environmental
permitting, and extensive public outreach.

Santa Claus Lane Class I Bike Path, Santa Barbara
County Association of Governments, CA. Project
Engineer. This 4,000-foot-long bike path will provide a crucial link in the Coastal Trail system in the City of Carpinteria and County of Santa Barbara including a
turnaround which is based on roundabout guidelines at
the Santa Claus Lane on-ramp to US 101. Due to the
constraints of the US 101, Union Pacific Railroad right-ofway, and wetlands—the proposed bike path will require a soldier pile retaining wall and custom guardrail to
complement the scenic corridor. The project must meet
the requirements of Local Coastal Plans from both the
City of Carpinteria and the County of Santa Barbara.

Unique, environmentally sensitive design alternatives are required. The project involves coordination with the
Santa Barbara County Association of Governments
(SBCAG), City, County and permitting agencies; design
581
A-6 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Michael Ip, PE, QSD | RESUME PG 2
Michael Ip, PE, QSD | RESUME PG 2
RESUME
exception fact sheets; project report; stormwater data
report; and final design.

Conejo School Road and Willow Lane Sidewalk and
Bike Lanes Project, City of Thousand Oaks, CA.

Project Manager. The City of Thousand Oaks received
Active Transportation Program (ATP) and Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding to improve
pedestrian and bicyclist safety along 1.1 miles of Conejo School Road and Willow Lane. Engineering services
consist of preliminary and final design, environmental
document, and property services for roadway widening,
retaining walls, reconstruction of private driveways,
sidewalk and sidewalk infill construction, bicycle and
traffic lane striping and markings, curb ramp construction and pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian activated
signals, storm drain improvements, stormwater treatment facilities and landscaping. Critical elements to project success encompass reconstruction of multiple private
driveways and retaining walls—requiring temporary
private property access and easements to construct the
proposed pedestrian and bicyclist facilities while
maintaining the existing roadway lane configuration.

Project design, R/W, and construction is estimated at
$4.5M.

Railroad Avenue Bike Trail Project, City of Santa
Clarita, CA. Project Manager. This $7M project designs

1.5 miles of bike trail along Railroad Avenue within Metro Railroad right-of-way from Lyons Avenue to Oakridge
Drive. The bike trail will require bridges over Newhall Creek and Placerita Creek. This project includes
conforming to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA)
requirements due to the proximity of street intersections, preliminary environmental studies, SCCRA double rail
study and coordinating with Metro, Southern California
Regional Rail Authority, and Los Angeles County Flood
Control District. Responsibilities include Preliminary
Engineering and Report.

El Segundo Boulevard Improvements, City of El
Segundo, CA. Project Manager/Engineer. El Segundo
Boulevard is a major six-lane east-west arterial with a median from Isis Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway
(PCH). West of PCH, El Segundo Boulevard is a fourlane divided arterial. Within the project limits, the roadway corridor is mixed with commercial properties
and aerospace campuses. The existing pavement
requires rehabilitation throughout the corridor with poor PCI index indicating pavement rehabilitation and/or
reconstruction. El Segundo Boulevard will require
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb
ramps and adequate pedestrian crossings at the
intersections of Illinois Street, Douglas Street, Nash
Street and Continental Boulevard; traffic signal
modifications; and dedicated bicycle facilities including bicycle detection. The present deficiencies and the high volume of vehicles during peak hours create adverse
conditions for cyclist and pedestrian users. The project will incorporate stormwater structural Best Management
Practices (BMPs) for the project corridor. The project will also enhance bicycle circulation by installing shared bike lane marking and dedicated bike lane striping on Douglas Street between Rosecrans Avenue and Imperial Highway
and on Nash Street between El Segundo Boulevard and
Imperial Highway. The City has budgeted $7M
construction cost for the proposed improvements.

Entrance Road Improvements, California State
University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA. Project
Manager. This $17M project designed a new entrance
road to the University. Project elements included
roadway/bike lane with two bridges; 153 acres of site
improvements (traffic signal, levee, parking lots,
playfields, bioswale, stormwater detention basin,
recycled and potable waterlines, and power and telecom
lines); bridge hydraulics; floodplain analysis; and permit engineering for Ventura County Watershed Protection
District, US Army Corps of Engineers, Department of
Fish and Wildlife, and Regional Water Quality Control
Board. Responsibilities included preliminary engineering and final design
B Street Railroad Crossing and Middle School Bike
Path, City of Fillmore, CA. Project Manager. This $2M
project involved a new bike path, B Street roadway
improvements, flood equalizer culverts, and new railroad crossing. Responsibilities included developing
alternatives; final design specifications, and estimates; environmental clearance; and coordinating with the
Caltrans Safe Route to School Programs and California
Public Utilities Commission for the new railroad crossing. 582
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-7

Sam Potts, PE, QSD/QSP | RESUME PG 1
RESUME
Sam Potts, PE, QSD/QSP
Project Engineer
Firm
 MNS Engineers, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Roadway design
 Bicycle and accessible facilities
 Drainage and stormwater design
 Utility coordination
Years of Experience
 9
Licensing
 Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 92519
Certification
 Qualified SWPPP Developer and Provider, CA No. 27824
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State University,
Northridge, CA
Affiliations
 American Public Works Association
 American Society of Civil Engineers (Los Angeles Younger Member Forum PE Review Course Chair and Task
Committee on Student Competitions Member)
Award
 Outstanding Undergraduate in Civil Engineering, California State University, Northridge, 2018
Mr. Potts is a Project Engineer within the Civil
Engineering, Transportation Engineering Division. Sam
brings nine years of experience. He takes a very visual approach to design, using three-dimensional computer
modeling to help accurately understand each challenge
and develop creative and innovative solutions. Sam’s
approach is to place himself throughout the project, from analyzing existing problems, anticipating construction
challenges, and creating safe and accessible multimodal corridors. His experience includes:

Hillcrest Drive Bike Lane and Pedestrian
Improvements, City of Thousand Oaks, CA. Project
Engineer. This road segment is a 1.25-mile portion is a six-lane divided arterial with a raised center median
without bike lanes. The project corridor is one of the main shopping and business areas. The City will design and
construct bicycle and pedestrian facilities along 1.25
miles of Hillcrest Drive, between Moorpark Road and
Lynn Road, with the primary objective of improving
bicyclist and pedestrian safety. The improvements
consist of enhanced bicycle and traffic lane striping and markings, construction of incomplete sidewalk segments
and retaining walls, and construction and rehabilitation of curb ramps and conversion of one travel lane in each
direction into Class IV bikeways. MNS is providing
preliminary and final engineering design, public outreach, and R/W property easement.

Domenic Massari Park Bike Lane System, City of
Palmdale, CA. Project Engineer. The City of Palmdale
obtained California Transportation Commission 2021
Active Transportation Program Quick-Build Project Pilot Program funding for the Domenic Massari Park Bicycle
Lane System Project. This project will install Class II bicycle lane bollard-buffered bicycle lanes on the
following streets:
• Avenue R-8 from 45th Street East to 60th Street East
(approximately 8,050 feet)
• Avenue S from Hillcrest Drive to 55th Street East
(approximately 1,475 feet)
• Avenue 55th Street from Avenue S to Avenue R
(approximately 5,300 feet)
MNS prepared the plans, specifications, and estimate for the project based on the proposed street typical sections provided in the grant application. As part of the project, the City desires to refresh the existing roadway striping in addition to the bicycle lane improvements.
583
A-8 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Sam Potts, PE, QSD/QSP | RESUME PG 2

Sam Potts, PE, QSD/QSP | RESUME PG 2
RESUME
C Street Bicycle Facilities Installation, City of
Oxnard, CA. Project Engineer. This project will install bicycle facilities (Class II and III) on C Street from
Hueneme Road to Gonzales Road. The project is
primarily located along C Street. At the southerly end, the bike facility will be on Courtland Street from Hueneme
Road to Canterbury Way. The project includes Class III
bicycle facilities to close gaps on the following streets intersecting or adjacent to C Street: Hill Street from C Street to Novato Drive, Guava Street from C Street to
East Hemlock Street, East Hemlock Street from Guava
Street to Patterson Road, and G Street from Guava
Street to Wooley Road. The project coordinates the
proposed improvements with two City projects: Thin
Maintenance Overlay Project Phase 2 and Bryce Canyon
North and South Resurfacing Project. The project will
provide approximately nine miles of bicycle facilities.

El Segundo Boulevard Improvements, City of El
Segundo, CA. Project Manager/Engineer. El Segundo
Boulevard is a major six-lane east-west arterial with a median from Isis Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway
(PCH). West of PCH, El Segundo Boulevard is a fourlane divided arterial. Within the project limits, the roadway corridor is mixed with commercial properties
and aerospace campuses. The existing pavement
requires rehabilitation throughout the corridor with poor PCI index indicating pavement rehabilitation and/or
reconstruction. El Segundo Boulevard will require
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb
ramps and adequate pedestrian crossings at the
intersections of Illinois Street, Douglas Street, Nash
Street and Continental Boulevard; traffic signal
modifications; and dedicated bicycle facilities including Class IV bikeway and bicycle detection. The present
deficiencies and the high volume of vehicles during peak hours create adverse conditions for cyclist and
pedestrian users. The project will also rehabilitate street pavement and enhance bicycle circulation by installing
shared bike lane marking and dedicated bike lane
striping on Douglas Street between Rosecrans Avenue
and Imperial Highway and on Nash Street between El
Segundo Boulevard and Imperial Highway. The City has
budgeted $8M construction cost for the proposed
improvements.

Conejo School Road and Willow Lane Sidewalk and
Bicycle Lanes Project, City of Thousand Oaks, CA.

Associate/Assistant Engineer. This $3.9M project
designs approximately 1.1 miles of pedestrian and Class II bicycle lane facilities on Conejo School Road and
Willow Lane between Hillcrest Drive and Hampshire
Road. Services involve preliminary and final design,
environmental document, public outreach, and right-ofway property easements for roadway widening, retaining walls, driveway reconstruction, sidewalk and sidewalk
infill construction, bicycle and traffic lane striping and markings, curb ramp construction and reconstruction,
pedestrian signals, landscaping, pavement rehabilitation, storm drain improvements, and stormwater treatment
facilities. A Caltrans Encroachment Permit must be
obtained for design and construction activities as the
Conejo School Road travels under the US 101. The
project received Active Transportation Program (ATP)
and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ)
funding so right-of-way acquisition must follow federal guidelines. Minimizing the impact to private property
owners when obtaining permanent and temporary
construction easements is critical since coordination and acquisition of easements drive the project schedule.

Responsibilities included computer-aided drawing (CAD)
setup, preparing demolition plans, designing driveways
and curb ramps, retaining wall/grading/site design, utility coordination, storm drain design, stormwater treatment
design, pavement rehabilitation analysis, field
assessments and verification, and landscape architect
coordination.

Dockweiler Road Extension, City of Santa Clarita,
CA. Project Engineer. This $30M Secondary Arterial—
Dockweiler Drive from Sierra Highway to Railroad
Avenue—will provide an important north-south
connection for the City, a new entrance to the Master’s University, and a secondary emergency access point for
the Placerita Canyon community. The roadway extension
and widening will go through an existing railroad
crossing, business district, hilly terrain, and the Master’s University property. MNS provides preliminary and final design engineering services. Preliminary engineering
services include traffic modeling, roundabout analysis
and simulation, intersection, and roadway and bikeway
alternatives. Final engineering services include roadway, bikeway and roundabout design, traffic calming, railroad crossing and permitting, traffic signals, street lighting, landscaping, drainage and stormwater treatment, mass
grading, environmental permitting, and extensive public outreach.
584
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-9

Robert Wilcox, EIT | RESUME PG 1
RESUME
Robert Wilcox, EIT
Project Engineer
Firm
 MNS Engineers, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Roadways
 Traffic signals
 Traffic/speed surveys
 Report preparation
Years of Experience
 9
Licensing
 Engineer-in-Training, CA No. 154064
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State University,
Northridge, CA
Mr. Wilcox is a Project Designer and Project Engineer
with the Transportation Engineering department. Robert
began his career with the City of Thousand Oaks where
he served as an Assistant Traffic Engineer. He is
knowledgeable with AutoCAD, geographic information
systems (GIS) systems, and traffic data analysis
software. His experience includes:

El Segundo Boulevard Improvements, City of El
Segundo, CA. Associate Engineer. El Segundo
Boulevard is a major six-lane east-west arterial with a median from Isis Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway
(PCH). West of PCH, El Segundo Boulevard is a fourlane divided arterial. Within the project limits, the roadway corridor is mixed with commercial properties
and aerospace campuses. The existing pavement
requires rehabilitation throughout the corridor with poor PCI index indicating pavement rehabilitation and/or
reconstruction. The $7M El Segundo Boulevard project
will require Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
compliant curb ramps and adequate pedestrian crossings
at the intersections of Illinois Street, Douglas Street, Nash Street and Continental Boulevard; traffic signal
modifications; and dedicated bicycle facilities including bicycle detection. The present deficiencies and the high volume of vehicles during peak hours create adverse
conditions for cyclist and pedestrian users. The project will incorporate stormwater structural Best Management
Practices (BMPs) for the project corridor. The project will also enhance bicycle circulation by installing shared bike lane marking and dedicated bike lane striping on Douglas Street between Rosecrans Avenue and Imperial Highway
and on Nash Street between El Segundo Boulevard and
Imperial Highway.

Conejo School Road and Willow Lane Sidewalk and
Bike Lanes Project, City of Thousand Oaks, CA.

Associate Engineer. The City of Thousand Oaks received
Active Transportation Program (ATP) and Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding to improve
pedestrian and bicyclist safety along 1.1 miles of Conejo School Road and Willow Lane. Engineering services for
this $3.9M project consist of preliminary and final design, environmental document, and property services for
roadway widening, retaining walls, reconstruction of
private driveways, sidewalk and sidewalk infill
construction, bicycle and traffic lane striping and
markings, curb ramp construction and pavement
rehabilitation, pedestrian activated signals, storm drain improvements, stormwater treatment facilities and
landscaping. Critical elements to project success
585
A-10 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Robert Wilcox, EIT | RESUME PG 2

Robert Wilcox, EIT | RESUME PG 2
RESUME
encompass reconstruction of multiple private driveways
and retaining walls—requiring temporary private property access and easements to construct the proposed
pedestrian and bicyclist facilities while maintaining the existing roadway lane configuration.

Railroad Avenue Bike Trail Project, City of Santa
Clarita, CA. Associate Engineer. This $7M project
designs 1.5 miles of bike trail along Railroad Avenue
within Metro Railroad right-of-way from Lyons Avenue to Oakridge Drive. The bike trail will require bridges over Newhall Creek and Placerita Creek. This project includes conforming to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA)
requirements due to the proximity of street intersections, preliminary environmental studies, SCCRA double rail
study and coordinating with Metro, Southern California
Regional Rail Authority, and Los Angeles County Flood
Control District.

C Street Bicycle Facilities Installation, City of
Oxnard, CA. Associate Engineer. This project will install bicycle facilities (Class II and III) on C Street from
Hueneme Road to Gonzales Road. The project is
primarily located along C Street. At the southerly end, the bike facility will be on Courtland Street from Hueneme
Road to Canterbury Way. The project includes Class III
bicycle facilities to close gaps on the following streets intersecting or adjacent to C Street: Hill Street from C Street to Novato Drive, Guava Street from C Street to
East Hemlock Street, East Hemlock Street from Guava
Street to Patterson Road, and G Street from Guava
Street to Wooley Road. The project coordinates the
proposed improvements with two City projects: Thin
Maintenance Overlay Project Phase 2 and Bryce Canyon
North and South Resurfacing Project. The project will
provide approximately nine miles of bicycle facilities.

Rancho Conejo Biotech Area Sidewalk Improvement
Project, City of Thousand Oaks, CA. Associate
Engineer. This project will provide pedestrian facilities within the Rancho Conejo Biotech area with the primary
objectives to complete the missing segments of sidewalk and to improve pedestrian safety within the project limits.

The improvements consist of sidewalk construction,
reconstruction of private driveways, curb ramp
construction and rehabilitation, construction of retaining curbs and walls, street lighting, crosswalk striping, and overhead pedestrian signal with Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Bacons (RRFB) at the intersection of Rancho
Conejo Boulevard and Corporate Center Drive.

Westlake Boulevard (State Route 23) Sidewalk and
Bicycle Lane Improvements, City of Thousand Oaks,
CA. Assistant Engineer. The City received grant funding from the Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP) for pedestrian and bike safety improvements on
Westlake Boulevard (State Route 23) from Triunfo
Canyon Road to the northbound US 101 ramps
(approximately 1.1 miles). Safety improvements included new sidewalks and curb ramps, curb ramp modifications,
and pedestrian and bike lane signing, striping, and
marking. Many mature trees will be impacted along the
corridor. This project included arborist investigation, a tree report with mitigations, and a public information and outreach program. The pedestrian and bicycle
improvements will be designed in accordance with the
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD), Caltrans Design Bulletin 82-05, Chapter 11
“Design Standards” of Caltrans Local Assistance
Procedure Manual (LAPM) and the latest Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). Westlake Boulevard south of US
101 is State Route 23; therefore, a Caltrans
Encroachment Permit process was followed.

Responsibilities included providing the signing and
striping plan, typical sections, and cost estimate.

Santa Ana Road Widening and Bike Lane Project,
County of Ventura, CA. Assistant Engineer. The County
of Ventura obtained federal funding to widen Santa Ana
Road to provide Class II bike lanes from Casitas Vista
Road to State Route 150 (six miles). Santa Ana Road is
a two-lane mountainous roadway popular with cyclist but lacks proper bicycle facilities. The $3.5M project required MNS to optimize the roadway widening to minimize utility relocations, hillside grading, and environmental impacts.

The project elements included driveway conforms, storm
drain improvements, temporary erosion control, and
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Detailed
traffic control and stage construction ensured property owner access at all times. Responsibilities included
signing and striping plan and typical sections.
586
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-11

Shane Sobecki, PLS | RESUME PG 1
RESUME
Shane Sobecki, PLS, EIT
Principal Surveyor
Firm
 MNS Engineers, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Land surveying
 Construction surveying
 Topographic survey and mapping
 Boundary surveys
 ALTA/NSPS surveys
 Right-of-way engineering
 Legal descriptions
 Easements
Years of Experience
 22
Licensing
 Professional Land Surveyor, CA No. 9041
 Engineer-in-Training, CA No. 141294
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State University,
Chico, CA
Awards
 2015 ACEC Engineering Excellence Award of Merit,
Ranchero Road Interchange at Interstate 15
 2014 APWA Project of the Year, Los Angeles Chapter,
Newhall Avenue Roundabout at Main Street
 2014 APWA Best Improvements for Traffic Safety,
Newhall Avenue Roundabout at Main Street
Mr. Sobecki has over 22 years of significant experience in land surveying. As Principal Surveyor, Shane plays a substantial role in managing and completing the firm’s
survey projects. He has over two decades of experience
in private and public sector projects in the central and southern California area. His land surveying background includes tentative subdivision mapping, final maps, site plans, easements, legal descriptions, annexation
exhibits, topographic mapping, 3D scanning, aerial
surveys, construction staking, monitoring, records of
survey, boundary surveys and right-of-way (R/W)
retracements. Shane has proficient knowledge in the use of AutoCAD and other surveying software. His
experience includes:

State Route 237/Calaveras Boulevard Near Term
Improvements, Santa Clara Valley Transportation
Authority (VTA), CA. Principal Land Surveyor. The State Route 237/Calaveras Boulevard Near Term
Improvements Project is along westbound Calaveras
Boulevard between the southbound Interstate
880/Calaveras Boulevard off-ramp and the State Route
237/McCarthy Boulevard on-ramp in the City of Milpitas.

The purpose of the project was to reduce congestion and improve traffic operations in the project area. The project adds a high occupancy vehicle (HOV) preferential lane at the westbound State Route 237/Calaveras Boulevard onramp and extend the westbound State Route 237/McCarthy Boulevard HOV bypass lane to the
McCarthy/Calaveras Boulevard intersection. The project
improvements provide westbound HOV vehicles the
ability to switch to either the Calaveras Boulevard onramp or McCarthy Boulevard on-ramp, depending on queue length.

Conejo School Road and Willow Lane Sidewalk and
Bike Lanes Project, City of Thousand Oaks, CA.

Project Surveyor. The City of Thousand Oaks received
Active Transportation Program (ATP) and Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding to improve
pedestrian and bicyclist safety along 1.1 miles of Conejo School Road and Willow Lane. Engineering services for
this $3.9M project consist of preliminary and final design, environmental document, and property services for
roadway widening, retaining walls, reconstruction of
private driveways, sidewalk and sidewalk infill
construction, bicycle and traffic lane striping and
markings, curb ramp construction and pavement
587
A-12 APPENDIX A. RESUMES

Shane Sobecki, PLS | RESUME PG 2
RESUME
rehabilitation, pedestrian activated signals, storm drain improvements, stormwater treatment facilities and
landscaping. Critical elements to project success
encompass reconstruction of multiple private driveways
and retaining walls—requiring temporary private property access and easements to construct the proposed
pedestrian and bicyclist facilities while maintaining the existing roadway lane configuration.

El Segundo Boulevard Improvements, City of El
Segundo, CA. Principal Land Surveyor. El Segundo
Boulevard is a major six-lane east-west arterial with a median from Isis Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway
(PCH). West of PCH, El Segundo Boulevard is a fourlane divided arterial. Within the project limits, the roadway corridor is mixed with commercial properties
and aerospace campuses. The existing pavement
requires rehabilitation throughout the corridor with poor PCI index indicating pavement rehabilitation and/or
reconstruction. El Segundo Boulevard will require
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb
ramps and adequate pedestrian crossings at the
intersections of Illinois Street, Douglas Street, Nash
Street and Continental Boulevard; traffic signal
modifications; and dedicated bicycle facilities including Class IV bikeway and bicycle detection. The present
deficiencies and the high volume of vehicles during peak hours create adverse conditions for cyclist and
pedestrian users. The project will also rehabilitate street pavement and enhance bicycle circulation by installing
shared bike lane marking and dedicated bike lane
striping on Douglas Street between Rosecrans Avenue
and Imperial Highway and on Nash Street between El
Segundo Boulevard and Imperial Highway. The City has
budgeted $8M construction cost for the proposed
improvements.

Dockweiler Drive Extension, City of Santa Clarita,
CA. Principal Surveyor. The City of Santa Clarita
proposes to construct a $30M Secondary Arterial—
Dockweiler Drive from Sierra Highway to Railroad
Avenue. The project will provide an important north-south connection for the City, a new entrance to Masters
University, and a secondary emergency access point for
the Placerita Canyon community. The roadway extension
and widening will go through an existing railroad
crossing, business district, hilly terrain, and the Master’s University property. Preliminary engineering services
include community outreach, traffic modeling, roundabout analysis and simulation, intersection, and roadway and
bikeway alternatives. Final engineering services include roadway, design following LACDPW LID Standards
Manual, bikeway and roundabout design, traffic calming, railroad crossing and permitting, traffic signals, street lighting, landscaping, drainage, and stormwater
treatment (including detention basins, infiltration
trenches, and bioretention areas), mass grading,
environmental permitting, and extensive public outreach.

Castillo Street Undercrossing-Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Project, City of Santa Barbara, CA.

Principal Surveyor. MNS provided surveying services for planning-level efforts to develop a concept alignment for pedestrian and cyclist safety improvements along Castillo Street between Montecito Street and Cota Street, and
along Haley Street between Castillo Street and De La
Vina Street. The proposed preliminary design included
buffered bike lanes, parkways, and landscaping to
provide sidewalk separation; the addition of lighting; and sidewalk infill and repair. The MNS Surveying group
prepared the base map for design using GPS survey for
initial project control and ground survey mapping for road improvements and utilities along 3,000 feet of City
streets. This included mapping all ADA ramps, lane
striping, parkway improvements and utilities. Utilities from service provider atlas maps were incorporated to the
base map as well as importing City-provided GIS data for underground lines and laterals. The topographic data
included the roadway, driveways, curb ramps, sidewalk,
curb and gutter, trees (including trunk diameter at breast height) and other vegetation, existing striping, traffic signals, street light poles, power poles and other utilities including pull boxes, meters, underground utilities, water and gas valves, manholes, and storm drain inlets.

Conejo School Road and Willow Lane Sidewalk and
Bike Lanes Project, City of Thousand Oaks, CA.

Project Surveyor. The City of Thousand Oaks received
Active Transportation Program (ATP) and Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding to improve
pedestrian and bicyclist safety along 1.1 miles of Conejo School Road and Willow Lane. Engineering services for
this $3.9M project consist of preliminary and final design, environmental document, and property services for
roadway widening, retaining walls, reconstruction of
private driveways, sidewalk and sidewalk infill
construction, bicycle and traffic lane striping and
markings, curb ramp construction and pavement
rehabilitation, pedestrian activated signals, storm drain improvements, stormwater treatment facilities and
landscaping. Critical elements to project success
encompass reconstruction of multiple private driveways
and retaining walls—requiring temporary private property access and easements to construct the proposed
pedestrian and bicyclist facilities while maintaining the existing roadway lane configuration.

Shane Sobecki, PLS, EIT | RESUME PG 2
588
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-13
Patrick De Guzman, PE | RESUME PG 1
RESUME
Patrick De Guzman, PE
Traffic Support
Firm
 MNS Engineers, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Traffic engineering
 Transportation engineering
Years of Experience
 9
Licensing
 Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 92120
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Affiliations
 Institute of Transportation Engineers
 American Public Works Association
Mr. De Guzman is a Project Designer and Project
Engineer with nine years of local government traffic and transportation engineering experience encompassing
active transportation, traffic safety, and calming roadway enhancements. Patrick also has three years of civil
engineering design experience including residential,
commercial, industrial, and public infrastructure. As a successful engineer and traffic administrator, he has
utilized his design knowledge to direct junior staff and deliver roadway enhancements to multiple jurisdictions
including signing and striping, traffic signal, roundabout, traffic control, and overall project management. Patrick has also been involved in plan production for private
residential projects and grading and drainage design.

Patrick has developed and maintains a working
knowledge of local city, county, and state engineering
regulations. His experience includes:

Buffered Bike Lane Enhancements Soledad Canyon
Road and Bouquet Canyon Road, City of Santa
Clarita, CA. Project Manager. Patrick managed the
design and construction of the signing and striping plans to install buffered bike lanes along the subject segments of the City.

Bikeway Enhancement Program, City of Irvine, CA.

Project Manager. The City dedicated funding for the
improvement of bikeway infrastructure as part of the
Irvine Strategic Active Transportation Plan. The plan
outlines major arterials for consideration of Class II
buffered bike lane and conflict zone improvements to
enhance the biking experience within Irvine's roadways.

Project elements include signing and striping
improvements to the latest state and federal standards, reduction of vehicle travel lane widths, and curbside
management. Responsibilities include team coordination
with the slurry and overlay project to incorporate signing and striping designs of class II bikeway enhancements,
schedule and budget management.

Bikeway Enhancements Safety Program, City of
Irvine, CA. Project Designer. The City of Irvine received a Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant to
address pedestrian and bike safety at seven locations
within the City that have been identified as top priorities by the community. The project will improve the
pedestrian and trail crossings at seven intersections with ADA curb ramps and rectangular rapid flashing beacons
(RRFBs). The project included coordination with the
589
A-14 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Patrick De Guzman, PE | RESUME PG 2
RESUME
City's Signal Maintenance and Street Maintenance
divisions. Responsibilities included engineering services for the design and preparation of the signing and striping plans.

West Gonzalez Road Improvement Project, City of
Oxnard, CA. Project Designer. Patrick provided
engineering services for signing and striping
improvement plans to enhance the bike lane facilities for the City including buffers and green conflict zone areas.

Port Hueneme Road Improvement Project, City of
Oxnard, CA. Project Designer. Patrick provided
engineering services for signing and striping
improvement plans to enhance the bike lane facilities for the City including buffers and green conflict zone areas.

Gillette Avenue Street Sweeping Program and
Complete Streets Enhancement, City of Irvine, CA.

Project Manager. Patrick managed the construction of a
reconfiguration of a four-lane roadway to a two-lane
roadway with additional parking, and bike lane facilities along Gillette Avenue from Main Street to Armstrong
Avenue. He worked with consultants, the community,
and presented to Transportation Commission to receive
approval for the improvement of the area to better
accommodate the change in land uses fronting the
segment from Industrial to Mixed-Use.

Newhall Avenue Beautification, City of Santa Clarita,
CA. Project Designer. Patrick provided engineering
services for the preparation of the signing and striping and traffic control plans for the street improvements
along Newhall Avenue from Sierra Highway to Railroad
Avenue.

Thermoplastic Lane Striping Program, City of Santa
Clarita, CA. Project Manager. Patrick managed and
provided engineering services for the program and
preparation of signing and striping plans to install
updated Caltrans Standard striping details along various corridors in the City. He designed the plans that would be part of a seven-year program.

Soledad Canyon Road and Langside Avenue Traffic
Signal Modification, City of Santa Clarita, CA. Project Manager. Patrick managed and provided engineering
services for the preparation of traffic signal modification plans, removal of flashing beacons, and installation of additional signal heads on the curved approach to this
intersection. He coordinated closely with Spectrum,
Edison, and the City.

Pedestrian Safety Enhancements, City of Santa
Clarita, CA. Project Designer. Patrick designed the
signing and striping plans for pedestrian safety
enhancements including continental crosswalk and curb
extension improvements at nine identified locations.

Various Locations, Pedestrian Crossing
Enhancements HSIP, City of Santa Clarita. Project
Manager. Patrick managed the design and construction
of the signing and striping enhancements to pedestrian
crossings at channelized right turn lanes at six locations within the City.

Canyon Country Community Center - Off Street
Improvements, City of Santa Clarita, CA. Project
Designer. Patrick supported the traffic control staging and handling, and final signing and striping design of the project which involved strategic analysis of the City's traffic volumes along the segment to determine
construction scheduling with as minimal impact as
possible on the City's traffic operation.

Parking Lot Re-configuration - The Cube Ice Station,
City of Santa Clarita, CA. Project Designer. Patrick
designed the re-configuration of the City's parking lot facility at the previous Valencia Ice Station to
accommodate the City's latest parking and ADA
standards.

Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Abelia Road,
Thompson Ranch Road, Pamplico Drive, City of
Santa Clarita, CA. Project Manager. Patrick designed
and managed the construction of speed cushions along
three segments of roadway in the City after coordinating the City's policies and procedures for installation with the affected communities.

Patrick De Guzman, PE | RESUME PG 2
590
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-15
Breanne Dunn, ASLA | RESUME PG 1
RESUME
Breanne Dunn, ASLA
Public Outreach
Firm
 Pacific Coast Land Design, Inc. (PCLD)
Years of Experience
 7
Education
 Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Affiliation
 American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)
Breanne found herself in the world of landscape
architecture after years of exploring a multitude of subdisciplines that make up the profession: fine arts, environmental science, cultural anthropology,
horticulture, permaculture, and other various service
work related experiences. She brings an empathetic
perspective to design shaped by the events and
relationships that have occurred throughout her life. She views the design profession through the lens of how
unique and often overlooked populations experience
public space differently. In 2019, Breanne returned to her home community of Ventura and joined Pacific Coast
Land Design to merge her local knowledge and deeprooted community connections with her newly framed passion at the intersection of people and place.

In interest of supporting community projects focused on the equity of reinvestment in public space, Breanne has led the development of PCLD’s newest service category
in grant writing. Coupled with an ever-evolving skill set in community-driven planning & design, her grant writing
efforts have led to over $50 million in recent awards for publicly funded work in disadvantaged communities
within Santa Barbara & Ventura Counties. These awards
include $27 million for the City of Ventura’s Santa Paula Branch Line ‘Rails with Trails’ project which she is
currently leading the design process intensive public
outreach efforts. She also helped secure $10M in funding for the Santa Paula Unified School District’s Green
Schoolyards projects and $5M for the Ventura River Trail Improvements Project that is currently wrapping PCLDled design and construction. Her relevant project experience includes:

SPBL Rails with Trails (Design + Grant Application),
City of Ventura, Ventura, CA. Public Outreach. This
project is a new, 4-mile trail to run alongside the
operational Santa Paula Branch Line. Breanne was a
contributor to the 2022 Caltrans ATP 6 Application for the project leading a community meeting and wrote
application narratives. The role includes close
coordination with the Transportation and
Communications staff, the Ventura County
Transportation Commission in an intensive 1-year
outreach effort including a project website, a series of special stakeholder meetings, community council
meetings, and general public meetings.
591
A-16 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Breanne Dunn, ASLA | RESUME PG 2
Breanne Dunn, ASLA | RESUME PG 2
RESUME
SPUSD Green Schoolyards Projects (Blanchard, Glen
City, and Barbara Webster Elementary Schools),
Santa Paula Unified School District, Santa Paula, CA.

Outreach Coordinator. Breanne provided in-depth project knowledge from grant applications into design
implementation. Project responsibilities include working closely with programming partners, district
superintendents, SPUSD Board Members,
administration/staff, and more.

Santa Paula Branch Line Masterplan/EIR Update
SCAG/REAP 2.0 Grant Application, Ventura County
Transportation, Ventura County, CA. Grant Support.

Grant application support for extensive 30+ meeting
outreach plan and community-benefit narratives.

Established in-depth knowledge of SPBL to support
VCTC in their successful grant award of $1.2M for the
Masterplan/EIR update.

La Colonia Green Alleys, City of Oxnard, Oxnard, CA.

Public Outreach. Project designer and outreach
facilitation for the budget constrained scope. Coordinated stakeholders and team consultants in multiple, complex
constraints leading to the successful implementation of the grant funded project. Design through Construction
Administration with project focus in safety and
environmental design.

Ventura River Trail Improvements Project, City of
Ventura, Ventura, CA; Public Outreach. Beanne led the
public outreach services for a 2-mile trail replacement.

Large contributor to the 2020 Caltrans Clean CA Grant
Application for all project funding leading grant narrative and outreach support. Provided support in early design
and outreach efforts.
592
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-17
Name | RESUME PG 1

RESUMES
Mike Zielsdorf
Landscape Architect
Firm
 Pacific Coast Land Design, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 QA/QC
 Park Design
 Public Engagement
 Stakeholder Engagement
 PS&E
Years of Experience
 20
Licensing
 Licensed Landscape Architect, CA No. 6044
Education
 Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Affiliation
 ASLA
As Principal Landscape Architect, Mike is the center of Pacific Coast Land Design’s daily operations and
responsible for design oversight and technical QA/QC.

Mike is a lifelong Ventura County resident, with more
than 20 years dedicated to the design of context
sensitive outdoor environments that showcase the
definitive cultural and natural resources of the region.

That experience includes the planning, design and
construction oversight of urban streetscapes, city parks and open space, public works infrastructure and infill
residential at a variety of scales and income levels. Mike brings his sound technical knowledge backed by a strong understanding of local plant communities and how best
to integrate low impact strategies that maximize water
savings and reduce site infrastructure impacts.

As Principal-in-Charge, Mike is currently involved in the oversight and management of each of PCLD’s public
serving projects. For the City of Santa Paula’s
Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project, Mike will
serve as Principal Landscape Architect, helping shape
project design as well as managing the day-to-day
contract and technical oversight with a keen eye on
meeting client deliverable deadlines and quality control.

His project experience includes:

Santa Paula Bike Trail and Mill Plaza, City of Santa
Paula, Santa Paula, CA. Principal-in-Charge. Lead
consultant and designer for the first constructed segment of the overall Santa Paula Branch Line Trail system.

Roles included implementation of VCTC's SPBL
Masterplan document; trail, streetscape, and stormwater infiltration design; and construction documentation and administration. Mill Plaza design – construction
administration support in coordination with Bike Trail
Project at the historic Santa Paula Train Depot.

Thousand Oaks Boulevard, City of Thousand Oaks,
Thousand Oaks, CA. Landscape Architecture Principal
in Charge. Managed public outreach, design, and
construction administration for beautification and
engineering improvements for Thousand Oaks
Boulevard.

Magic Mountain Beautification, City of Santa Clarita,
Santa Clarita, CA. Prime Principal Consultant. Provided beautification and engineering design for new medians
and parkways adjacent to an I5 on-ramp/off-ramp. Ongoing design, contracted through bid assistance with possible CA support.
593
A-18 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Name | RESUME PG 2

RESUMES
Newhall Gateway (ongoing), City of Santa Clarita,
Santa Clarita, CA. Prime Principal Consultant. This was a 10-acre city gateway landscape beautification project within Caltrans right-of-way. Caltrans client liaison and lead design services include extensive coordination
management between Caltrans, traffic engineers, civil
engineers, and the client.

Dockweiler Extension Project, City of Santa Clarita,
Santa Clarita, CA. Principal-in-Charge. Prime consultant for the extension of Dockweiler Drive. Roles included
management of the new roadway's landscaped medians,
parkways and intersection treatments.

Additional experience includes:
• 10th Street Beautification, City of Santa Paula, Santa Paula, CA
• Vista Canyon Transit Center, City of Santa Clarita,
City of Santa Clarita, Santa Clarita, CA
• La Colonia Green Alleys, City of Oxnard, Oxnard, CA
• Orchard Village Medians, City of Santa Clarita, City
of Santa Clarita, Santa Clarita, CA
• Hollister/State Streetscape Improvement Plan,
County of Santa Barbara Planning, Santa Barbara,
CA, Old Town Newhall and Roundabout, City of
Santa Clarita, City of Santa Clarita, Santa Clarita, CA • Heritage Grove Community Development,
Hearthstone Multi-Asset, Filmore, CA
Mike Zielsdorf | RESUME PG 2
594
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-19
Matthew T. Ingamells | RESUME PG 1

RESUMES
Matthew Ingamells
Environmental Services
Firm
 Padre Associates, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Environmental (CEQA/NEPA) document preparation
 Biological impact assessment
 Regulatory permitting
 Caltrans oversight
 Wetland delineation and mitigation
 Air quality and noise studies
Years of Experience
 42
Certification
 Certified Ecologist
Education
 MA, Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA  BS, Environmental and Systemic Biology, California
Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Affiliations
 Ecological Society of America
 Society for Conservation Biology
Mr. Ingamells has over 42 years of experience in
environmental document preparation; biological impact
assessment, constraints analysis and mitigation;
regulatory permitting, permit compliance monitoring and mitigation monitoring; environmental documentation for
transportation projects (Caltrans oversight); wetland
delineation and mitigation; air quality and noise studies.

His experience includes:

Conejo School Road and Willow Lane Sidewalk and
Bike Lanes Project, City of Thousand Oaks, CA.

Environmental Engineer. This $4.7M project designs
approximately 1.1 miles of pedestrian and Class II
bicycle lane facilities on Conejo School Road and Willow Lane between Hillcrest Drive and Hampshire Road. The
project design includes roadway widening, soil nail,
reinforced concrete and masonry, retaining walls,
driveway reconstruction, sidewalk and sidewalk infill
construction, bicycle and traffic lane striping and
markings, curb ramp construction and reconstruction,
pedestrian signals, landscaping, pavement rehabilitation, storm drain improvements, and stormwater treatment
facilities. As a subconsultant to MNS, Padre prepared
environmental documentation.

Thousand Oaks Boulevard Streetscape Phase I
Improvements, City of Thousand Oaks, CA.

Environmental Engineer. The City of Thousand Oaks
developed a Specific Plan for Thousand Oaks Boulevard
including a streetscape. IN particular, the corridor from Erbes Road to Conejo School Road is he Civic Arts
Plaza Treatment Zone. This project designed enhanced
pedestrian nodes—curb extensions/bulb outs and
aesthetics in the intersection of Erbes Road, Dallas
Drive, and Conejo School Road—and a landscaped
median and gateways (east and west) into the Civic Arts Plaza. Winner, 2020 APWA Project of the Year. As a
subconsultant to MNS, Padre prepared environmental
documentation.

Westside Bike and Pedestrian Improvements, City of
Ventura, CA. Environmental Engineer. Mr. Ingamells
prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City on roadway improvements to enhance pedestrian and
bicyclist safety.

Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Interconnection Project EIR, Calleguas Municipal
Water District, CA. Project Manager. The project would
connect the potable water systems of two regional
purveyors, including new pipelines, a new pump station, 595
A-20 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Matthew T. Ingamells | RESUME PG 2

RESUMES
and minor expansion of the Las Virgenes Municipal
Water District's recycled water distribution system. Issues of concern analyzed in the EIR included noise,
aesthetics, biological resources (Lindero Creek), cultural resources and hazardous materials (soil contamination).

Westlake Boulevard (State Route 23) Sidewalk
Improvements, City of Thousand Oaks, CA.

Environmental Engineer. Matthew prepared a Natural
Environment Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
for the City, focusing on improving pedestrian and
bicyclist safety.

Thousand Oaks Auto Mall Street Widening, City of
Thousand Oaks, CA. Environmental Engineer. Matthew
prepared an environmental constraints analysis, focusing on biological resources, cultural resources, aesthetics, and water resources for proposed expansion of on-street parking.

Erbes Road Capital Improvement Project, City of
Thousand Oaks, CA. Environmental Engineer. Matthew
prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
City, addressing roadway widening, with a follow-up EIR Addendum addressing changes to the project.

Randall Road Debris Basin EIR, Santa Barbara
County Flood Control District, CA. Project Manager.

The project was developed in response to catastrophic
debris flows in the Montecito area and would retain
debris generated by storm flows in San Ysidro Creek and reduce the potential for flooding of adjacent lands. Issues of concern analyzed in the EIR included noise,
aesthetics, biological resources, air quality, cultural resources, and traffic.

Updated Carpinteria Salt Marsh Enhancement Plan
Subsequent EIR, Santa Barbara County Flood
Control District, CA. Project Manager. The Santa
Barbara County Flood Control District updated the
existing Carpinteria Salt Marsh Enhancement Plan. Mr.

Ingamells managed preparation of a Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report to update and augment the
2003 Final EIR prepared for the original Enhancement
Plan. Issues of concern include short-term impacts to
water quality and biological resources in the dredged
channels and nearshore areas adjacent to sediment
disposal areas.

Agromin Composting and Soil Amendment Facility
EIR, County of Ventura, CA. Project Manager. Mr.

Ingamells prepared an EIR on behalf of Ventura County
to address an increase in the amount of feedstock and
compost allowed on site and extend the term of the
conditional use permit. The facility attracts large number of gulls and has been implicated in adverse effects on
adjacent populations of nesting threatened and
endangered birds (least tern, snowy plover). Padre
developed a multi-faceted, integrated predatory bird
management plan to minimize the attraction of predatory birds to the Agromin Facility and resulting impacts to
listed bird species. The Plan included bird deterrence
features (mylar flagging, flight diverters, air dancers, spike stripping, effigies), a hazing dog program, a fulltime falconry program, lethal control, and monitoring and adaptive management plan.

Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Subsequent
EIR, County of Santa Barbara, CA. Project Manager.

This preparation of an EIR aimed to enhance solid waste recovery and recycling at the Tajiguas Landfill. The
project includes a materials recovery facility, anaerobic digestion facility, energy facility and digestate composting area. The Subsequent EIR assessed seven alternatives,
including three off-site alternatives at the same level of detail as the proposed project. Issues of concern
included aesthetics, biological resources, geologic
hazards, hazardous materials, and water quality.

Regional Salinity Management Project, Program
EIR/Environmental Assessment, County of Ventura,
CA. Project Manager. The project consists of a 32-milelong pipeline system to convey treated wastewater and brine concentrate to an existing ocean outfall for
disposal. The project would facilitate use of poor-quality groundwater and treated municipal wastewater by
transporting high salinity wastewater and brine to the
ocean, which would reduce the buildup of salts in the
watershed. The Program EIR/EA addressed Phase I
impacts at a project-specific level of detail and Phase II at a program level of detail. Issues analyzed in depth
included water quality, biology, noise, agriculture, and risk of upset.

Renewable Water Resource Management Program
EIR/Environmental Assessment, County of Ventura,
CA. Project Manager/Lead Preparer. This environmental
review of an integrated set of facilities aimed at reducing reliance on imported water supplies while improving
water quality through the managed transport of salts out of the lower Calleguas Creek watershed. Facilities
include pipelines, wells, water quality monitoring stations, replenishment water outfalls, and water treatment and
blending facilities. Issues of concern included surface water resources, groundwater resources, water quality,
biological resources, cultural resources, and noise.

Matthew Ingamells | RESUME PG 2
596
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-21
Name | RESUME PG 1

RESUMES
Thomas J. Wheat, PE, TE
Lighting and Traffic Engineer
Firm
 TJW Engineering, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Traffic engineering
 Transportation planning
Years of Experience
 29
Licensing
 Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 69467
 Professional Traffic Engineer, CA No. 2565
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering, Clemson University, SC
Affiliations
 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Member
 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Member
Mr. Wheat is a highly experienced traffic engineering
professional with over thirty years in the industry,
specializing in traffic engineering and transportation
planning projects for both public and private sectors.

Since moving to California in 2003, Thomas has
successfully managed and designed hundreds of
projects, bringing extensive expertise and a strong track record of delivering high-quality engineering solutions.

Thomas leads a team of 13 engineers and designers,
who collectively bring nearly 100 years of experience in traffic engineering and transportation planning. His
versatile expertise encompasses the design and
construction of various infrastructure projects, including lighting plans, traffic signal plans, temporary traffic control plans, signing and striping plans, traffic signal systems, roundabouts, signal timing, Intelligent
Transportation Systems (ITS), and traffic calming
designs.

In addition to his design work, Thomas has prepared a
wide range of traffic engineering studies for various
clients and agencies across California and for public
agencies on the East Coast. These studies include traffic impact studies, trip generation studies, parking studies, safety studies, and warrant analyses, among others.

Before relocating to California, Thomas worked for
several engineering firms in the Washington D.C. area,
where he consulted for various public entities, including the FHWA, Maryland State Highway Administration,
Virginia Department of Transportation, and numerous
local agencies along the East Coast. He was involved in a diverse array of traffic engineering projects that
included I-95/I-495 interchange project.

Thomas has acquired experience in designing ITS
systems for Closed Circuit Television Cameras (CCTV),
Changeable Message Signs (CMS), and traffic signal
interconnect systems for clients on the East Coast. For the City of Greenville, North Carolina, He worked on the design of a city-wide traffic signal system design that included the design of the citywide fiber optic
communications backbone supporting CCTV, CMS, and
real-time traffic data. Thomas has also designed
construction plans to place CMS’s at strategic locations throughout a city where traffic information was
disseminated to the public, and has also helped design
both the temporary and future ITS communications
system for the Capital Beltway Project outside of
Washington D.C. linking field technologies (CCTVs,
597
A-22 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Name | RESUME PG 2

RESUMES
CMS, sampling stations, etc.) to a central operations
center miles away.

Thomas started his career at Kane County Division of
Highways in the suburbs of Chicago, IL. Not only did his design career begin at the County, but he also gained
valuable experience in overseeing some of the County’s
larger highway projects at the time as an assistant
resident engineer. Thomas worked directly with the
contractors overseeing and inspecting the pavement,
traffic signal, electrical, and drainage construction. There, he learned aspects of the construction process that have helped him in his career as a designer. His experience
includes:

Residential Streets, Walkway, Park Lighting Design
(TR20536), City of Ontario, CA. Lighting Engineer.
prepared plans, specifications, and estimates for private streets, sidewalks, pathways, parks, and swimming pool
recreational areas as part of a Lennar Homes residential development in the City of Ontario. The project included photometric analysis, voltage drop calculations, circuitry, specifications, and details for a variety of lighting types including concrete street poles, wall mounted fixtures, and bollard style lighting fixtures.

Residential Pathway Lighting Design (TR18916), City
of Ontario, CA. Lighting Engineer. prepared plans,
specifications, and estimates for a new pathway
connecting the residential park areas to City sidewalk in the City of Ontario. TJW prepared photometric analysis, voltage drop calculations, circuitry, specifications, and details for a bollard style lighting infrastructure.

Hueneme Road and J Street Traffic Signal
Modification Plan, City of Oxnard, CA. Traffic
Engineer. TJW worked with MNS in the preparation of a
traffic signal modification plan design for the signalized intersection Hueneme Road and J Street in the City of
Oxnard. The project included the replacement of two
existing traffic signal poles that were affected by a new box culvert and associated ADA upgrades. TJW also
prepared temporary traffic signal plans for the threephased construction project. Plans were prepared to convey to the contractor how the traffic signal operations would be maintained during construction.

Willow Lane and Manzanita Lane Pedestrian Signal
Warrant Review and Pedestrian Beacon Design, City
of Thousand Oaks, CA. Traffic Engineer. TJW worked
with MNS to prepare pedestrian signal warrants for the
installation of a high intensity activated crosswalk beacon (HAWK) assembly for a new crosswalk at the intersection of Willow Lane and Manzanita Lane in the City of
Thousand Oaks. Once the warrants showed that a hybrid
beacon assembly was not warranted, TJW worked with
the City and MNS to design a pedestrian activated
flashing beacon assembly on signal poles. The design
was prepared so that when warrants are met in the
future, a HAWK system could be incorporated without
many modifications to the poles, foundations, and
infrastructure.

Merit, Bend, Sawbuck Crosswalk and RRFB Design,
City of Irvine, CA. Traffic Engineer. TJW prepared
signing and striping and RRFB plans for crosswalks on
three streets within the City of Irvine’s Great Park
neighborhood connecting sidewalks in trails at mid-block locations. TJW prepared the plans, specifications, and
estimates for the project.

Eucalyptus Avenue and Auto Mall Drive HAWK
Signal Design, City of Moreno Valley, CA. Traffic
Engineer. TJW prepared a pedestrian HAWK signal
design for a new crosswalk at the intersection of
Eucalyptus Avenue and Auto Mall Drive in the City of
Moreno Valley. TJW prepared the plans, specifications,
and estimates for the project for the project and
coordinated the service connection with the utility
company for service.

Thousand Oaks Blvd. Streetscape Improvement
(Phase I), City of Thousand Oaks, CA. Traffic
Engineer. TJW worked with MNS in the preparation of
traffic studies and traffic signal modification plan designs for the signalized intersections at Erbes Road and Los
Feliz Drive on Thousand Oaks Boulevard in the City of
Thousand Oaks. The project included bulb-outs,
streetscaping, ADA compliance and signal upgrades.

Great Park Neighborhood Traffic Engineering Design,
City of Irvine, CA. Traffic Engineer. TJW prepared traffic signal, signing/striping, and traffic control design for arterial and collector streets for the Great Park
Neighborhoods project for the master developer, Five
Point Communities. Great Park Neighborhoods,
consisting of more than 2,000 acres, is Irvine’s newest mixed-use, master planned community. It is in central
Orange County, adjacent to the over 1,200-acre Orange
County Great Park. TJW has been the traffic engineering consulting firm on the project and has designed the
design of approximately 50 traffic signals and
roundabouts for the streets of Portola Parkway, Irvine
Boulevard, and Trabuco Road to name a few and
included City of Irvine’s fifth high school, Portola High School.

Thomas Wheat, PE, TE | RESUME PG 2
598
APPENDIX A. RESUMES A-23
Name | RESUME PG 1

RESUMES
Alahesh Thurairajah, PE, GE, BC. GE
Geotechnical Services
Firm
 Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Areas of Expertise
 Geotechnical design/construction
 Bicycle trails and pedestrian structures
Years of Experience
 15
Licensing
 Professional Civil Engineer, CA No. 81439
 Geotechnical Engineer, CA No. GE 3123
 Board-Certified Geotechnical Engineer, Certificate No. 01457, ASCE
Education
 MS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Los
Angeles
 BS Magna Cum Laude, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Mr. Thurairajah is a geotechnical principal/project
manager with 15 years of experience on California
transportation projects. Alahesh has provided
geotechnical design/construction recommendations for
300+ bridges, 400+ standard and non-standard retaining
walls, and 200+ miles of roadway. He has prepared
Foundation Reports and Geotechnical Reports in
compliance with Caltrans standards for numerous
bridge/roadway projects. His technical expertise includes design of deep and shallow foundation for bridges,
retaining walls, and drainage structures; probabilistic seismic hazard evaluation, liquefaction and seismic
settlement evaluations, lateral spreading evaluation,
static and pseudo-static slope stability analyses,
pavement structural section evaluation/design, and
corrosion evaluation. Alahesh was selected because of
his experience with bike trails and pedestrian structures.

His project experience includes:

Orange County Public Works, OC Loop O, P, & Q –
Coyote Creek Channel, Orange County and Los
Angeles County, CA. Geotechnical Project Manager.

The project included a 2.7- mile new bikeway along the
Coyote Creek Channel, closing the gap between the
Coyote Creek Channel in Cerritos to La Mirada
Boulevard in Buena Park. The project improvements
included a single-span bridge over Coyote Creek, 30-
span bridge over UPRR, 20-span bridge over BNSF,
ground anchor wall, soldier/secant pile walls, MSE walls, tub wall, RCB culvert, BNSF underpass, standard
retaining walls, and new pavement structural sections.

Prepared Preliminary Foundation Report for Type
Selection, managed geotechnical field investigation,
provided earth pressure recommendations for retaining
walls, provided recommendations for bridges and wall
foundations, provided recommendations for pavement
structural sections in expansive soils, and prepared
Foundation Reports and Geotechnical Report.

City of Irvine, Venta Spur Trail Pedestrian
Overcrossing, Irvine, CA. Geotechnical Project
Manager. The project included a Class I bicycle and
pedestrian connection of the Venta Spur Trail across SR133 and Marshburn Channel. The proposed two-span bridge over SR-133 will be approximately 264-feet-long
and 17-feet-wide and will be supported on 16-inch and
24-inch CIDH piles. The proposed single-span bridge
over Marshburn Channel will be approximately 23-feetlong and 17-feet-wide and will be supported on 16-inch CIDH piles. In addition, four retaining walls and an
Overhead Sign are proposed. Prepared two Preliminary
599
A-24 APPENDIX A. RESUMES
Name | RESUME PG 2

RESUMES
Foundation Reports for Type Selection, managed
geotechnical field investigation, provided
recommendations for foundations, prepared three
Foundation Reports. Worked with Caltrans and TCA
reviewers to minimize the review time gaining approval of the Foundation Reports. This project was awarded the
2023 Outstanding Bridge Project by ASCE Orange
County.

City of Santa Monica, Beach Improvement Group
(B.I.G) Projects - Pier Bridge and Idaho Avenue
Pedestrian Overcrossing the California Incline, Santa
Monica, CA. Senior Staff Engineer. The project included the replacement of the California Incline Viaduct,
evaluation of the feasibility of widening/retrofitting the Pier Bridge, and replacement of the Idaho Avenue
pedestrian overcrossing the California Incline. Conducted field explorations, provided foundation recommendations, and prepared reports for preliminary and final design.

City of Irvine, Jeffrey Open Space Trail (JOST)
Pedestrian Crossing, Irvine, CA. Geotechnical Project
Manager. The project included a Class I bicycle and
pedestrian overcrossing connecting JOST across I-5, in
the vicinity of the I-5/Jeffrey Road interchange. The
proposed seven-span bridge will be approximately 1,190- feet-long and 21-feet-wide and will be supported on
driven steel HP 14x117 piles. In addition, retaining walls are proposed at both sides of abutments to support the
access ramp to the proposed bridge. Prepared
Preliminary Foundation Report for Type Selection,
managed geotechnical field investigation, provided
recommendations for foundations and pavement
structural sections, prepared Foundation Report and
pavement memo. Worked with the Caltrans Geotech
reviewer to minimize the review time, gaining approval of the Foundation Report on the second submittal, which
accelerated the geotechnical delivery.

City of Malibu, Las Flores Creek Pedestrian Bridge,
Malibu, CA. Staff Engineer. The project involved
construction of a new 100-feet-long single-span
pedestrian bridge. Reviewed existing information,
planned coordinated and conducted geotechnical field
investigation, assigned laboratory tests, created LOTB, generated design ARS curve, evaluated soil bearing
capacity, performed global stability analysis, and
prepared a Foundation Report.

City of Temecula, Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II,
Temecula, CA. Geotechnical Project Manager. The
project proposes to eliminate the existing at-grade street crossing of the existing multi-use trail. Two retaining walls are proposed to accommodate this reconfiguration:
a Caltrans Type 5 wall is proposed on the channel slope and will be used to retain the new trail; a ground anchor wall is proposed below the existing Margarita Road UC
and is used to retain the abutment end slope. He
oversaw the field investigation and lab testing and
developed and provided design and construction
recommendations for ground anchor walls and Caltrans
Type 5 wall. A foundation report provided the design and construction recommendations.

City of Jurupa Valley, Pacific Avenue Pedestrian and
Bicycle Improvements Project, Jurupa Valley, CA.

Geotechnical Principal. The City of Jurupa Valley
proposes constructing new sidewalks, curb and gutters,
rehabilitating existing pavement, and widening the
existing roadway. Oversaw the field investigation and
pavement rehab recommendations prepared by EMI
staff. Reviewed the pavement memorandum.

SANDAG, Bayshore Bikeway Segments 4 and 5, San
Diego and National City, CA. Staff Engineer. The
project included constructing a continuous bikeway from southern downtown San Diego to National City. Planned,
coordinated, and conducted geotechnical field
investigation, performed double-ring infiltrometer in-situ test, and assigned laboratory tests. Estimated soil
infiltration rates, recommended pavement structural
sections, and prepared a technical memorandum.

City of Irvine, Jamboree Road Pedestrian Bridge,
Irvine, CA. Geotechnical Project Manager. The project
included a pedestrian bridge crossing over Jamboree
Road. The proposed single-span bridge will be
approximately 180-feet-long and 17-feet-wide and will be supported on driven 36-inch diameter CIDH piles.

Prepared Preliminary Foundation Report for Type
Selection, managed geotechnical field investigation,
provided recommendations for foundations, and
prepared Foundation Report.

City of Newport Beach, Superior Avenue Pedestrian
Bridge and Parking Lot Project, Newport Beach, CA.

Geotechnical Principal/Project Manager. The project
included a pedestrian and bicycle bridge and a new
larger parking lot. The proposed single-span thrust arch bridge is approximately 210-feet-long and 18-feet-wide
and will be supported on 78-inch diameter CIDH piles. In addition, seven retaining walls, stairway, and a parking lot are proposed. Managed geotechnical field
investigation, evaluated settlement and settlement period in organic soils and provided recommendations for
settlement mitigation, provided recommendations for
foundations, provided pavement structural sections, and prepared Geotechnical Report.

Alahesh Thurairajah, PE, GE, BC. GE | RESUME PG 2
600
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 601
100 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 105 | Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 805.692.6921 OFFICE
mnsengineers.com
June 20, 2024
City of Santa Paula, City Clerk's Office
Attention: Tatiana Arnaout, PE
970 E. Ventura Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
RE: Fee Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project
Dear Ms. Arnaout:

MNS Engineers, Inc. (MNS) appreciates the opportunity to submit this fee proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for the Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project. This proposal encompasses tasks for all three segments. Some tasks may not be required if the City chooses to go forward with just one segment. We can refine the cost proposal based on more City input.

Authorized Representative
I am hereby authorized to negotiate and contractually bind MNS:

Brandon Reyes, Vice President - Transportation
951.532.4510 | [email protected]
MNS is confident our uniquely experienced and qualified team will provide quality services to meet the City Santa Paula’s expectations and goals. We look forward to working with the City. Please contact me or Michael Ip, PE, QSD, Project Manager at 805.391.0415 or [email protected], with any questions you may have about our submittal. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
MNS Engineers, Inc.

Brandon Reyes
Vice President - Transportation

MNS DETAILS

LEGAL NAME
MNS Engineers, Inc.

FIRM OWNERSHIP TYPE
C-Corporation

YEAR FIRM ESTABLISHED
1962

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
DIR No. 1000003564

CORPORATE OFFICE
201 N. Calle Cesar Chavez
Suite 300
Santa Barbara, CA 93103
805.692.6921 Office/Fax
mnsengineers.com

LOCAL OFFICE
100 E. Thousand Oaks
Boulevard, Suite 105
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
805.692.6921 Office

PROJECT CONTACT
Michael Ip, PE, QSD
Project Manager
805.391.0415 Mobile
[email protected]

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
Brandon Reyes
Vice President - Transportation
805.331.4848 Mobile
[email protected]

EXHIBIT C
602
Principal Engineer
Senior Engineer
Project Engineer
Associate Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Principal Surveyor
Assistant Project
Surveyor
Associate Project
Surveyor
Party Chief (Perez)
Chain Person
One Man Survey
Crew
Task Descriptions $305 $235 $210 $190 $175 $280 $160 $175 $190 $160 $225 Task 1. Project Management

1.01 Project Management 24 24 $7,320 $1,925 $9,245

1.02 Kick-off Meeting 3 2 5 $1,335 $2,508 $3,8431.03 Progress Meetings (12) 12 12 24 $6,180 $7,392 $13,5721.04 Project Schedule 4 4 $1,220 $803 $2,0231.05 Project Communication 1 1 $305 $305

1.06 Project Coordination 12 12 $3,660 $3,6601.07 Monthly Invoicing 12 12 $3,660 $3,660 $36,308 Task 2. Data Gathering, Site Visit, Topographic Survey and Prelim Dwgs

2.01 Data Collection & Review 4 8 8 20 $4,300 $10,153 $14,453

2.02 Regulatory, Code and Permitting Requirements
a. SWPPP & TWPCP (5 Sheets) 8 40 40 88 $17,840 $17,840
b. VCWPD Encroachment Permit (North Segment) 24 48 72 $17,400 $17,400c. VCTC SPBL Permit (West & East Segments) 4 16 20 $4,580 $4,580d. CPUC GO 88-B Authorization (West Segment) 24 40 64 $15,720 $15,720

2.03 Geotechnical Investigation 2 2 $610 $18,360 $18,9702.04 Survey and Mapping 50 156 20 103 94 40 463 $86,070 $9,075 $95,1452.05 Utility Investigation 8 20 40 68 $13,640 $1,500 $15,1402.06 Environmental Impact Analysis 4 4 $1,220 $43,896 $45,116 $244,364 Task 3. Community Engagement

3.01 Kickoff Meeting 2 2 4 $1,030 $1,540 $2,570

3.02 Initial Internal Review Meeting 2 2 4 $1,030 $1,540 $2,5703.03 Community Meeting 6 6 6 18 $4,140 $23,678 $27,8183.04 Progress Internal Review Meeting 1 1 2 $515 $897 $1,4123.05 Progress Commission Review Meeting/Presentation 2 2 4 $1,030 $1,793 $2,8233.06 Final Review Meeting/Presentation 2 2 4 $1,030 $1,287 $2,317 $39,510 Task 4. Schematic Design

4.01 Design Study Alternatives (2 for each segment; 6 total) 8 40 16 64 $13,640 $9,799 $23,439

4.02 Refine Study Alternatives 4 12 12 28 $5,840 $2,450 $8,2904.03 Schematic Plans and Specifications Title Sheet 1 1 2 4 $865 $865
Typical Sections (2 Sheets) 4 8 12 24 $4,840 $4,840Layout Plan (double stacked) at 1"=20' Scale including signing & striping (12 Sheets) 12 32 16 60 $13,180 $13,180Landscaping/Aesthetic Plan at 1" = 20' Scale (12 Sheets) $13,127 $13,127

4.04 Project Team Coordination 2 2 $610 $3,282 $3,8924.05 Stakeholder Coordination 2 2 $610 $610

4.06 Site Furniture Evaluation $3,282 $3,2824.07 Landscaping Evaluation $3,282 $3,2824.08 Signing Evaluation 1 4 5 $1,145 $1,1454.09 Irrigation Evaluation $3,282 $3,2824.10 Lighting Evaluation $3,282 $3,520 $6,8024.11 Stormwater Treatment Evaluation 1 4 5 $1,145 $1,1454.12 Cost Estimating 4 8 16 28 $5,700 $3,282 $8,982 $96,162 Task 5. Design Development

5.01 Renderings $5,225 $5,2255.02 Landscape Samples $1,100 $1,1005.03 & 5.04 Design Development (70% PS&E) - West Segment Update Title Sheet, General Notes & Typical Sections (2 Sheets) 1 2 4 7 $1,425 $1,425Demo & Utility Disposition Plans @ 1" = 20' double stacked (4 Sheets) 8 16 32 56 $11,080 $11,080Bikeway Improvement Plan & Profile @ 1" = 20' Scale (8 Sheets) 16 32 64 112 $22,800 $22,800 Signing and Striping Plans @ 1" = 20' double stacked (4 Sheets) 8 16 24 48 $9,680 $9,680Pathway Lighting Plans @ 1" = 40' doubled stacked (4 Sheets) $14,080 $14,080 Task Summary
MNS Engineers, Inc., Team Resource Fee Estimate
Community Bike Trail Connectivity Project
MNS Engineers
MNS Resource Hours
Total Costs
MNS Resource Costs
Pacific Coast Land
Design, Inc.

Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Padre Associates, Inc.

Task Costs
Reimbursables
TJW Engineering, Inc.

Central Coast Aerial
Mapping