Santee City Council
February 22, 2023

6. Action/Project Title: Building Codes
Progress Report Period: January 1, 2020 to March 30, 2022 Responsible Agency: County of San Diego, County Planning & Development Services (Building Division), and County Fire
Project Status: Completed
Summary: Building codes were reviewed to reflect current earthquake standards annually and update as necessary. County Staff attended jurisdictional conferences related code changes or updates related to seismic and other natural disasters.

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-302
Groups included International Code Counsel, County Building Officials Association of California (CBOAC), California Building Officials (Calbo).

This is an ongoing effort, and project is still relevant. Department suggests adding a review of fire and wind standards annually to include the most relevant natural disasters that effect our community.

7. Action/Project Title: Support public and private sector symposiums that emphasize hazard mitigation planning
Progress Report Period: January 2018 to January 2023
Responsible Agency: County Office of Emergency Services (County OES), County Departments, Cities, and private sector partners
Project Status: Completed and Ongoing
Summary: County OES maintains a support posture of public and private sector symposiums with an emphasis on hazard mitigation. In September 2021, County OES participated with the Air Protection Control District (APCD) and the California Air Resource Board in a symposium tailored around air-quality. County OES also participates quarterly with San Diego Gas & Electric’s (SDG&E’s) Access and Functional Needs team to discuss ways the public can be best prepared for Public Safety Power Shutoffs.

Obstacles, problems, or delays include shift in priorities due to COVID-19 pandemic and staffing changes/staff turnover. The department suggests this project should outline key deliverables and note specifically what is to be accomplished through supporting symposiums.

8. Action/Project Title: Maintain multi-jurisdictional/multi-functional training and annual exercises to enhance hazard mitigation
Progress Report Period: January 2018 to January 2023
Responsible Agency: County Office of Emergency Services (County OES), County Departments, All 18 Cities/appropriate Private Sector Agencies Project Status: Ongoing
Summary: From Fall 2017 to Summer 2018, County OES staff planned and deployed a San Diego Regional Tabletop Exercise (TTX) conducted on June 18, 2018, completing the process with a published AAR/IP (After Action Report / Improvement Plan.) This was the result of a UASI grant proposal from OES.

From Spring 2019 to October 2019, County OES’ team planned a November 6, 2019 San Diego Regional Full Scale Exercise (FSE) across regional agencies at all levels of government and the private sector, in response to priorities of the San Diego MyTEP (Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan – San Diego Urban Area, 2019-2022.

They completed the process with a published AAR/IP. This was the result of a UASI grant proposal from OES.

From Fall 2020 to July 2021, County OES’ staff also planned a July 27, 2021 San Diego Regional TTX for government and nonprofit agencies across San Diego, with AAR After Action Report improvements in response to priorities of the San Diego

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-303
MyTEP (Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan – San Diego Urban Area, 2019-2022.

They completed the process with a published AAR/IP. This was the result of a UASI grant proposal from County OES.

To meet the priorities of San Diego MyTEPs for 2019-2022 and 2022-2025, OES’s team kicked off planning for a January2023 regional FSE (Full Scale Exercise) in December 2021 and are currently hosting monthly planning meetings with large regional stakeholder groups, attracting approximately 85 stakeholder agency members. A FSE planning team of about 30 members is now meeting, including all 18 City Emergency managers, and a variety of special districts such as water agencies, airport and ports, USAR (Urban Search and Rescue) team, as well as public safety partners. This exercise prioritizes testing core capabilities testing identified in the MyTEPs and testing regional response plans such as OA EOP, local EOPs and response plans.

The OA and local agency EOC response will be tested for a catastrophic natural and human caused hazard scenario. This FSE will also testing Emergency Public Information through a regional JIC response, EOC activation and response procedures across agencies and jurisdictions, recovery operations and Initial Damage Assessment, alert and warning, regional coordination and communication, terrorism response and infrastructure systems, such as water agency response in emergencies.

County OES staff from 2021 to April 2022, OES planned, developed, and deployed a 6-month long training program for new and existing OES Staffs for the all-hazards response Staff Duty Officer (SDO) program; with subsequent Qualification Board testing for all SDO Under Instruction candidates in April 2022, to certify and deploy them as SDOs for emergency response. Staff had a 100% pass rate through this intensive oral Qual Board and practical hands-on technical test.

From November 2021 to present, the County OES training officer promoted UASI and CSTI training courses to County OES staff, EOC responders and EOC partner agencies, to bolster training for local important courses such as EOC positions Specific training – Planning, management, operations and Finance/Admin, Public Information Officer course, Mass Care courses and Recovery Operations, among others and booked a local EOC Operations and Planning course in the San Diego IA EOC for November 2022.

On April 10, 2022, The County OES Ops Coordinator completed a County OES training program needs assessment to identify areas for improvement, as presented to County OES leadership, and plans are underway to continue to expand training in FY 2022-23.

To meet the priorities of the San Diego MyTEP (Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan) – San Diego Urban Area, 2019-2022 and 2022-2025, County OES staff planned and conducted the following EOC exercises:
o Hot Wash on Two Coastal Incidents – Tongan Tsunami and Orange / San Diego County Oil Spill and generated After Action Lessons Learned for approximately 25 regional agencies at all levels of government.
o EOC Planning P, EOC Action Plan, Battle Rhythm and EOC Planning TTX 2/23/22

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-304
o EOC Operations functional training exercise 3/2/22
o Tongan Tsunami Advisory for San Diego FSE 1/18/22
Projects obstacles, problems and delays Coordinators were hired October 2021; departure of key staffs that managed projects, causing significant delays in initiatives, including Training & Exercises Lead departing.

Obstacles can arise any time such as when County OES staffs the EOC in emergencies and the two-year long COVID emergency activation caused competing priorities. The COVID emergency activation also delayed access to many training and exercise opportunities nationwide 2020 to 2022, due to social distancing health safety considerations. Other significant EOC activations that also tapped out staffs and changed priorities - wildfire season response, west coast oil spill, west coast tsunami advisory and other emergency EOC activations.

Regional FSE is an Ops Plan goal for fiscal include extensive staff turnover at County OES – five new Emergency Services year 2022, July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023. Training and Exercise Planning remains a high priority for County OES.

9. Action/Project Title: Review and update annually regional emergency plans, Concept of Operation plans, protocols, and standard operating procedures Progress Report Period: January 2018 to January 2023
Responsible Agency: County Office of Emergency Services (County OES), appropriate county Departments, and all 18 Cities/Special Districts Project Status: Delayed and Ongoing
Explain: Project was delayed due to OES staff turnover.

Summary: County OES created a Plan Revision Schedule which includes an annual cycle where Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), Concept of Operations (ConOps), Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP), Site Evacuation Plan (SEP), Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), and Checklists are reviewed, updated, tested, validated, approved, and trained.

This project is a priority for County OES and is contingent on collaboration with County OES staff members. County OES staff turnover caused deadline obstacles and time delays. This project is still considered relevant, and revisions/updates to regional emergency plans, ConOps, protocols, and SOPs are ongoing. County OES is updating the SOP Library document to include a revision, training, and testing schedule; review and approval process; review checklist; version control measures and storage location; handling confidential information process; and training, testing and validation process.

10. Action/Project Title: Encourage the public to prepare and maintain a 3-day preparedness kit for home and work through outreach events, social media, paid media and earned media.

Progress Report Period: January 2018 to January 2023
Responsible Agency: County Office of Emergency Services (County OES), County Communications Office, and County Technology Office

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-305
Project Status: Delayed and Ongoing
Explain: The department is not aware of what would constitute the project as complete. The project could be considered ongoing. Since the potential for emergencies and natural disasters continues, the project still has relevancy. The project could stay the same or potentially be modified to recommend community members ideally prepare a kit with food, water to last at least three days, but three days could also be a challenge with current inflation and perhaps that should be considered as well.

Summary: There have been staffing changes which limit the ability to report on the full scope of accomplishments for the reporting period. Awareness of accomplishments during this period include the vast number of files, emails, PowerPoint presentations, and documents left from the previous Public Outreach Specialist would indicate a high-level work ethic to achieve the Office of Emergency Services vision and the essential functions of the position. It should also be noted PowerPoint presentations created prior to the recent staffing changes indicate a recommendation to build a kit to last for 3 to 5 days.

Efforts to achieve this goal are visible in the recently updated Personal Disaster Plans. Page 40 of the plan encourages readers to prepare a home kit to service for at least three days without water or electricity. Additionally, these plans were made to consider individuals with access and functional needs. These disaster plans were translated and available in 12 languages. They are available for free to download from the OES website and are also regularly mailed out to community members who request a hard copy. The PowerPoint was used for a presentation at La Jolla Country Day on November 18, 2021, where the recommendation was made for those in attendance to build a preparedness kit to last 3-5 days. This project could be considered ongoing and be included in current and future public education, information, outreach, and community engagement efforts (These messages can continue to be shared with the public and included in future outreach programming through January 2023).

Obstacles, problems, or delays include shift in priorities due to COVID-19 pandemic, staffing changes/staff turnover, completing trainings, the learning curve, competing priority projects, project also requires many staff hours, and collaboration is in part contingent on resources, others, invitations, creating opportunities to share the information with others and potentially funding for incentives to create additional opportunities to share the information with the public.

11. Action/Project Title: Develop a Climate Action Plan Progress Report Period: January 2018 to January 2023
Responsible Agency: Land Use & Environment Group and County Office of Emergency Services (County OES)
Project Status: Completed

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-306
Summary: For further details, please visit the County’s Climate Action Plan website.139F140 F140 F
141

141
https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/sustainability/cap.html#:~:text=The%20County%20of%20San%20Diego,over%20the %20next%2030%20years.

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-307

7.2. PLAN UPDATE EVALUATION
TABLE 71: PLANNING AND MITIGATION EVALUATION
Plan Section Considerations Explanation
Planning
Process
Should new jurisdictions and/or
districts be invited to participate in
future plan updates?
All jurisdictions within San Diego County are welcome to participate and will continue to be invited to participate in future plan updates.

Have any internal or external
agencies been invaluable to the
mitigation strategy?
All internal and external planning partners are invaluable to our mitigation strategy.

Internal partners assisted most with updating the hazard assessment, mitigation actions, strategies and providing progress reports.

External partner assistance was most helpful related to climate change incorporation into hazards and updating
the hazard assessment.

Can any procedures (e.g., meeting
announcements, plan updates) be
done differently or more efficiently?
County OES recommends allotting more time for all
planning partners to complete FEMA Handbook Tasks 5,
6 and 7 since these sections require greater amounts of time and effort to collaborate with additional team
members, plan/document in-depth
goals/objectives/actions and provide supporting
documentation for previous plan accomplishments.

Has the Planning Team undertaken
any public outreach activities?
The Planning Team conducted public outreach activities
outlined in Section 3 of this plan. Some future public
outreach activities are outlined in Section 6 of this plan, but are not inclusive of all public outreach activities.

How can public participation be
improved?
Public participation may be improved with continued
partner outreach, seminars, surveys, public education
opportunities/presentations and other methods (both
virtual and in-person) outlined in Section 6 of this plan.

Have there been any changes in
public support and/or decision- maker
priorities related to hazard mitigation?
Public feedback details are provided in Section 3 of this plan. Updated priorities and reasoning are covered in
Section 6 and 7 of this plan.

Capability
Assessment
Have jurisdictions adopted new
policies, plans, regulations, or reports
that could be incorporated into this
plan?
Jurisdiction-specific adoptions/incorporations are covered in individual annexes to this plan.

Are there different or additional
administrative, human, technical, and
financial resources available for
mitigation planning?
Not currently. The Planning Team will continue to monitor.

Are there different or new education
and outreach programs and resources
available for mitigation activities?
The Planning Team will continue to monitor and seek
opportunities to facilitate new education and outreach
programs/resources, especially for priority actions outlined in Section 6 of this plan.

Has NFIP participation changed in the
participating jurisdictions?
For NFIP participation, see Sections 1 and 7 of this plan for the County of San Diego and associated plan annexes for all other participating jurisdictions.

Risk
Assessment
Has a natural and/or technical or
human-caused disaster occurred?
Disasters, such as, but not limited to, pandemic disease and wildfires, have occurred during the planning stages of this plan.

Should the list of hazards addressed
in the plan be modified?
Not currently. The Planning Team will continue to monitor, assess, and update as needed.

Are there new data sources and/or
additional maps and studies
Not currently. The Planning Team will continue to monitor, assess, and update as needed.

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-308
Plan Section Considerations Explanation
available? If so, what are they and
what have they revealed? Should the
information be incorporated into future
plan updates?
Do any new critical facilities or
infrastructure need to be added to the
asset lists?
Not currently. The Planning Team will continue to monitor, assess, and update as needed.

Have any changes in development
trends occurred that could create
additional risks?
See the Development Section of this plan and the 2021
County of San Diego Vulnerability Assessment and
Adaptation Report for a list of policies to minimize new residential development in very-high and high fire hazard severity zones, and increase resilience of existing
development in high-risk areas.

Are there repetitive losses and/or
severe repetitive losses to
document?
According to the 2022 FEMA Repetitive Loss Summary
Report, the County of San Diego has 20 Repetitive Loss
properties, and 3 Severe Repetitive Loss properties.

Plan Section Considerations Explanation
Mitigation
Strategy
Is the mitigation strategy being
implemented as anticipated? Were
the cost and timeline estimates
accurate?
The mitigation strategy experienced delayed
implementation due to some staff/project manager
turnover and decreased time available to plan and
implement. Emergency Operations Center activation for
the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic affected timeline estimates.

Should new mitigation actions be
added to the Action Plan? Should
existing mitigation actions be revised
or eliminated from the plan?
Not currently. The Planning Team will continue to monitor, assess, and update as needed.

Are there new obstacles that were not
anticipated in the plan that will need to
be considered in the next plan
update?
Not currently. The Planning Team will continue to monitor, assess, and update as needed.

Are there new funding sources to
consider?
Not currently. The Planning Team will continue to monitor, assess, and update as needed.

Have elements of the plan been
incorporated into other planning
mechanisms?
Yes, e.g., the Emergency Operations Plan and other
County emergency plans.

Plan
Maintenance
Procedures
Was the plan monitored and
evaluated as anticipated?
The plan was monitored and evaluated as anticipated.

However, it would have been more helpful to the Planning Team to have more time to complete Sections 5-7 of this plan, which will be accounted for in the next planning
cycle.

What are needed improvements to
the procedures?
None currently. The Planning Team will continue to
monitor, assess, and update as needed.

7.3. PLAN MAINTENANCE, MONITORING, EVALUATION, & UPDATES Hazard Mitigation Plan maintenance is the process the Planning Team establishes to track the plan’s implementation progress and to inform the plan update. The plan must include a description of the method and schedule for monitoring, evaluating, and updating it within a 5- year cycle. These procedures help to:

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-309
 Ensure that the mitigation strategy is implemented according to the plan.  Provide the foundation for an ongoing mitigation program in your community.  Standardize long-term monitoring of hazard-related activities.  Integrate mitigation principles into community officials’ daily job responsibilities and department roles.
 Maintain momentum through continued engagement and accountability in the plan’s progress.

7.3.1 PLAN MONITORING
Plan monitoring means tracking the implementation of the plan over time. The plan must identify how, when, and by whom the plan will be monitored.

The Hazard Mitigation Planning Group (HMPG) participants listed in Section 2 of this plan will be responsible for monitoring the plan annually for updates to jurisdictional goals, objectives, and action items. If needed, these participants will coordinate through the County Office of Emergency Services (County OES) to integrate these updates into the Plan. County OES will be responsible for monitoring the Plan for updates on an annual basis.

Status of this plan’s Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions are tracked annually by County OES via a five-year cycle project plan and charter created by County OES. Every year, County OES will ask planning participants named in Section 2 of this plan to report on the status of their projects, the success of various implementation processes, difficulties encountered, success of coordination efforts, and strategies that should be revised.

7.3.2. PLAN EVALUATION
The Plan is evaluated by the County Office of Emergency Services (County OES) and by each participating jurisdiction annually to determine the effectiveness of programs, and to reflect changes in land development or programs that may affect mitigation priorities. This includes re-evaluation by Hazard Mitigation Planning Group (HMPG) leads (or their select jurisdictional representative) based upon the initial STAPPLEE criteria used to draft goals, objectives, and action items for each jurisdiction. County OES and city representatives also review the goals and action items to determine their relevance to changing situations in the county, as well as changes in State or Federal regulations and policy.

County OES and jurisdictional representatives review the risk assessment portion of the Plan to determine if this information should be updated or modified, given any new available data.

The coordinating organizations responsible for the various action items will report on the status of their projects, the success of various implementation processes, difficulties encountered, success of coordination efforts, and which strategies should be revised.

Any updates or changes necessary will be forwarded by planning participants to County OES for inclusion in further updates to the Plan. The HMPG and each Local Mitigation Planning Team meet annually to discuss the status of this Plan.

7.3.3. PLAN UPDATES
Since this Plan’s original adoption in 2005 the Hazard Mitigation Planning Group (HMPG) has participated in an annual review. This process was continued after the adoption of the

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-310
2010 plan. The review details all mitigation actions that were deferred, begun, continued, or completed during that calendar year. In the past five years, there has been considerable progress made with the successful completion of most action items developed by the participating jurisdictions. Section 7.1 details the status of the action items from the 2018 plan.

This review process has been effective in identifying gaps and shortfalls in funding, support, and other resources. It has also allowed for the re-prioritization of specific actions as circumstances change. It allows each participating jurisdiction to maintain the plan as a living document. This review process has enabled the HMPG to improve the document by eliminating actions that have been completed, adding new actions that have been identified since the plan’s adoption and reprioritizing other actions to reflect new priorities and/or constraints. The negative side of this review process is that it is time consuming, pulling staff away from their day-to-day responsibilities.

The County Office of Emergency Services (County OES) will continue to be the responsible agency for updates to the Plan, and responsible for monitoring the Plan for updates on an annual basis. All HMPG participants will continue to be responsible to provide County OES with jurisdictional-level updates to the Plan annually or when/if necessary, as described above.

Status of this plan’s Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions are tracked annually by County OES via a five-year cycle project plan and charter created by County OES. Every year, County OES will ask planning participants named in Section 2 of this plan to report on the status of their projects, the success of various implementation processes, difficulties encountered, success of coordination efforts, and strategies that should be revised.

Every five years the plan will be updated and submitted to existing authorities outlined in Section 1 of this plan and Cal OES and FEMA for review.

7.3.4. IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH EXISTING PROGRAMS AND OTHER

PLANNING MECHANISMS
County and local jurisdictions have implemented most of the Priority Actions from the 2018 Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) through existing programs and procedures. Planning participants used (and will continue to use) this plan as a baseline of information related to priority hazards impacting their jurisdictions, to identify vulnerable communities and critical assets, and plan for their protection. The planning participants have also been able to refer to existing institutions, integrations, plans, policies, and ordinances defined for each jurisdiction, which was outlined in Section 2 of this plan (e.g., General Plan).

After regional adoption of this MJHMP update, planning participants will incorporate this plan into their General Plans and/or other comprehensive plans and procedures as those plans require review and revisions. Some of those documents will implement and/or be informed by this plan, which include (and are not limited to):
 San Diego County/Cities General Plans & Safety Element o Required incorporation of this plan’s 2018 and 2023 updates, including evacuation information and priority hazards into the County’s Safety Element (lead by Planning & Development Services) to demonstrate progress of local

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-311
hazard mitigation efforts and ensure compliance with the California Government Code. Plan leads (listed in Section 2 of this plan) met as needed to collaborate on cohesive updates, then discuss how and where to include the update within their respective plans.140 F141 F141 F
142
 County Legislative Program
o The vulnerability assessments, priority hazards, Goals, Objectives, and Actions/Priority Actions from this plan update helped the Office of Emergency Services’ planning group inform the County Legislative Program’s Priority Issues and Policy Guidelines through the addition of mitigation considerations and an allhazard approach to disaster planning and legislation support.141 F142 F142 F 143
 San Diego County Evacuation and Sheltering Plans
o This plan’s priority hazards, hazard profiles, hazard mitigation actions/priority actions, and vulnerability assessments inform evacuation and sheltering plans to account for the safety of people and assets during all-hazard scenarios to the furthest extent feasible. Implementation of this plan’s update ensure compliance with existing federal and state legislation.
 San Diego County Operational Area Emergency Operations Plan 2022 o Hazard information from the MJHMP update was incorporated into the 2022 County of San Diego Operational Emergency Operations Plan (OA EOP) update.

All high significance hazards identified in the MJHMP update were addressed in the 2022 OA EOP update.
 State & Federal Hazard Mitigation Programs
o Members from the Office of Emergency Services’ planning group participated in interviews with Cal OES to share planning experiences and best practices from this plan’s update, provide feedback on the State & Federal Hazard Mitigation Program, and provide recommendations for program and plan improvement.

Task Four of the FEMA Local Mitigation Handbook, Sections 1, 2, 4, and 7 of this plan, and jurisdiction-specific annexes describe the process by which local governments will integrate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms, such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans. The County of San Diego specifically meets with all necessary partners to collaborate on planning mechanisms/updates, conducts an approval process through the public, department leadership, Unified Disaster Council (UDC) voting/approval, then Board of Supervisor and other elected official approval. All listed steps were conducted on necessary and required bases.

The administrative and technical capabilities of the County, as discussed in Sections 2 and 4 of this plan, provide an identification of the staff, personnel, and department resources available to implement the actions identified in Section 6 of this plan.

Specific resources reviewed include those involving technical personnel such as planners/engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices, engineers trained in construction practices related to building and infrastructure, planners, and engineers with an understanding of natural or human-caused hazards, floodplain

142 https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/pds/generalplan/GP-Progress-Reports.html#ProgressReports 143 https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/cao/edga.html

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-312
managers, surveyors, personnel with GIS skills and scientists familiar with hazards in the community.

7.3.5. RESPONSE PLANS
Several other operational or functional response plans are also influenced by information contained in this plan. These plans include but are not limited to:

General Plan, Safety Element and Emergency Operations Plan, Annex Q – Evacuation: A review of the vulnerability and estimated losses detailed in the hazard profiles can help identify evacuation routes and locations, and their capacity, safety, and viability in different emergency scenarios.

These plans inform this plan by helping the Planning Group evaluate the impacts of multiple or cascading hazards, so that evacuees are not relocated into an area that puts them at risk from other hazards.

7.3.6. CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
The 2018 plan was posted on the Hazard Mitigation page of the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services (County OES) webpage, and the public has always been encouraged to comment on the plan online. Once approved, this revised plan will be posted on the Hazard Mitigation webpage of the County OES website and participating jurisdictions will have links to the Plan on their websites.

The participating jurisdictions and special districts continue to be dedicated to involving the public directly in the review process and updates of the Plan. A maintenance committee made up of a representative from County OES and a representative from each participating jurisdiction is responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the Plan as described above. During all phases of plan maintenance, the public will have the opportunity to provide feedback.

In addition, hard copies of the plan are catalogued and kept by the appropriate agencies in the county. The existence and location of these copies are also posted on the county website. To facilitate public comments, the County OES Hazard Mitigation webpage contains an email address for the public’s use, which is monitored daily by County OES staff. Any questions or comments received on this website are forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the HMPG for their review and response. County OES also tracks public comments on this plan.

A press release requesting public comments is also issued for each update, and after each evaluation. County OES also uses social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) to notify the public of any changes they should be aware of. These notifications direct people to the Hazard Mitigation webpage, where the public can review proposed changes.

Coupled with the dedicated email address for comments, this provides the public a simple, easily accessible manner to express concerns, opinions, or ideas about any updates/changes that are proposed to the Plan.

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-313
County OES will continue to be responsible for publicizing any changes to the Plan and maintaining public involvement.

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-314

APPENDIX
Decorative Image Photo by County OES, Rob Andolina
San Diego County, California
2023

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-315
APPENDIX 1. BASE DATA SOURCES 2021

TYPE SECTION SOURCES CREDITS HAZUS

CLASSIFICATIONS EXCLUSIONS NOTES/ASSUMPTIONS

INFRASTRUCTURE

OIL/GAS

PIPELINES
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - NG PIPELINES
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA) Buried Pipelines
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - PETROLEUM

PIPELINES
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA) Pipelines

RAILROA

D TRACKS
SDE.SANGIS.RAILROAD -
RAIL_TYPE =
'TRAIN'
San Diego Association of
Governments
(SANDAG)
Railway Tracks
Excluded defunct
freight lines SDE.SANGIS.RAILROAD -
RAIL_TYPE =
'TROLLEY'
San Diego Association of
Governments
(SANDAG)
Light Rail Tracks
HIGHWAY California Department of
Transportation
California Department of
Transportation
Highway Roads (Major
Roads + Urban Roads)

CRITICAL FACILITIES

AIRPORT

FACILITIE
S
SDE.SANGIS.AIR_AIRPORT
S + web SanGIS + Google, etc.

Control Towers +
Terminal Buildings
+ Parking Structures +
Fuel Facilities +
Maint/Hangar Facilities
+ Runways + Other
Excluded military
and private facilities
Terminals-Large
SDE.SANGIS.AIR_AIRPORT
S + web SanGIS + Google, etc. Terminals-Small
SDE.SANGIS.AIR_AIRPORT
S + web SanGIS + Google, etc. Control Towers
SDE.SANGIS.AIR_AIRPORT
S + web SanGIS + Google, etc.

Runways: Asphalt -- includes
major
taxi-ways
SDE.SANGIS.AIR_AIRPORT
S + web SanGIS + Google, etc. Strips: Dirt, gravel, etc.

BRIDGES
Homeland Infrastructure
FoundationLevel Data (HIFLD) - Railroad
Bridges
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency
(NGA) By
material/design/length
and by light
rail/railroad/highway
Excluded any on
military bases, and
on reservations if
not major road or
greater
Added some highway bridges
from imagery/NBI/SDE. No
rail bridges were added as the
data showed no new ones
Homeland Infrastructure
FoundationLevel Data (HIFLD) - National
Bridge Inventory
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA)
SDE.SANGIS.BRIDGES SanGIS
BUS

FACILITIE
S
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - Amtrak Stations
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA)
Urban Station + Fuel
Facility + Dispatch
Facility + Maintenance
Facility
HAZUS + web
Federal Emergency
Management Agency
(FEMA) + Google, etc.

SDE.SANGIS.TRAN_STOPS_
SG + web SanGIS + Google, etc.

COMMUNI
CATION

FACILITIE
S/

UTILITIES
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - AM Antennas +
HAZUS
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA)
Central Offices +
Stations/Transmitters
(AM or FM, TV
stations, Weather
stations, Other)
AM Antennas from previous
analysis matched current
HSIP/HAZUS data
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - FM Antennas +
HAZUS
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA)
FM Antennas from previous
analysis matched current
HSIP/HAZUS data (two
stations on reservation land
were excluded as well)
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - TV Digital
Transmitters + HAZUS
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA)
Added one digital TV
transmitter up near San
Marcos from HAZUS datalooked it up on FCC website
and is active

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-316
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - Broadband
Transmitters
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA)
Analog transmitters are no
longer in use as of July 2021
No changes
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD)- Weather Stations
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency (NGA) Added for 2021- only 1
station

ELECTRIC
POWER

FACILITIE
S
CEC - PP_SD California Energy
Commission
Transmission
Substations +
Distribution Circuits +
Generation
Plants
Excluded private
facilities Power plants
CEC - Substation_SD California Energy
Commission
Substations on
reservations NOT
excluded
(Campo)
Substations

TYPE SECTION SOURCES CREDITS HAZUS

CLASSIFICATIONS EXCLUSIONS NOTES/ASSUMPTIONS
CRITICAL FACILITIES, continued
(EMERGEN
CY

RESPONSE)

EMERGENC
Y

CENTERS,
FIRE

STATIONS,
POLICE

STATIONS
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) -
Local_EmergencyOperations
Centers
+SDE.SANGIS.FACILITY_CRI
TICAL
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency
(NGA) + SanGIS
Emergency Operation
Center
Includes 4 alternate locations
SDE.SANGIS.FIRE_STATION SanGIS Fire Station
Excluded military
and reservation
facilities
SDE.SANGIS.FACILITY_CRIT
ICAL + SDE.SANGIS.PLACES
+ web +
SDE.SANGIS.LAW_FACILITY
SanGIS Police Station
Excluded military
and reservation
facilities
Included Customs + Border
Patrol

GOVERNME
NT

OFFICE/CIV

IC CENTER
SDE.SANGIS.FACILITY_CRITI
CAL +
SDE.SANGIS.PLACES +
visual/web analysis
SanGIS + Google, etc.

HAZUS: From General
Building Stock - GOV1I
(General Services) - not
GOV2I (Emergency
Response)
Excluded military
and reservation
facilities, and any
facilities already
covered by
Emergency
Response group

HOSPITALS
/
CARE

FACILITIES
SDE.SANGIS.FACILITY_CRITI
CAL +
SDE.SANGIS.PLACES +
visual/web analysis
SanGIS + Google, etc.

Hospitals
(Small/Medium/Large) +
Medical Clinics (Clinics,
Labs, Blood Banks)
Excluded hospitals
without ER facilities
PORT

FACILITIES
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - Ports
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency
(NGA)
Waterfront Structures +
Cranes/Cargo Handling
Equipment +
Warehouses + Fuel
Facilities
Excluded private
facilities/marinas
NAV_UNIT_N = '32ND ST.

NAVAL BASE' OR
NAV_UNIT_N = 'SAN DIEGO

UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT,
BROADWAY PIER' -- used
central port locations, not
separate wharf/pier locations

POTABLE
WATER

FACILITIES
HAZUS + web
Federal Emergency
Management Agency
(FEMA) + local
governments + Google,
etc.

Pumping Plants +
Wells + Water Storage
Tanks (0.5MGD to
2MGD) + Water
Treatment Plants
(Large/Med/Small)
Treatment Plants - included
Carlsbad desalination facility
(near complete)
SDE.SANGIS.HYD_LAKE SanGIS Reservoirs (without adjacent plants)
WASTE
WATER
FACILITIES HAZUS + web
Federal Emergency
Management Agency
(FEMA) + local
governments + Google,
etc.

Treatment Plants
(Large/Med/Small)
+ Lift Stations
(Large/Med/Small)
Treatment Plants

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-317
RAIL

FACILITIES
Homeland Infrastructure
FoundationLevel Data (HIFLD) -
Intermodal
Terminal Facilities
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency
(NGA)
Railway: Urban Station
+ Fuel Facility+
Dispatch Facility +
Maintenance Facility
Light Rail: DC
Substation + Dispatch
Facility + Maintenance
Facility
Terminal Facilities
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - Amtrak Stations
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency
(NGA)
Amtrak Stations
Homeland Infrastructure
FoundationLevel Data (HIFLD) - Railroad
Yards + web
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency
(NGA) + Google, etc.

Yard Facilities
SDE.SANGIS.TRAN_STOPS_
SG + web
San Diego Association of
Governments
(SANDAG) + Google, etc.

Sprinter Stations
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD) - Fixed-Guideway
Transit Stations +
SDE.SANGIS.TRAN_STOPS_
SG + web
National Geospatial
Intelligence Agency
(NGA) + San Diego
Association of
Governments (SANDAG)
+ Google, etc.

Transit Centers

SCHOOLS
SDE.SANGIS.PARCELS_ALL SanGIS Grade Schools +
Colleges/Universities
(HAZUS data for SD is
only grade schools --
not
colleges/universities)
Excluded any on
military bases and
reservation land
Excluded
SOCtypes:

Alternative Schools
of
Choice,
Continuation High
Schools, County
removed any that had
closed- used CA dept of ed
GIS to get updated schools
and enrollments
Community Analyst Dun & Bradstreet, via Esri
Excluded private
facilities and trade
schools
Homeland Infrastructure
Foundation- Level Data
(HIFLD)- Type 1
universities/jr colleges only

TYPE SECTION SOURCES CREDITS HAZUS

CLASSIFICATIONS EXCLUSIONS NOTES/ASSUMPTIONS
POPULATION +

BUILDINGS

POPULATIO
N
2019 Census U.S. Census Bureau Buried Pipelines

RESIDENTIA
L

BUILDINGS
SDE.SANGIS.PARCELS_
ALL
SanGIS
Used an overlay of
LANDUSE_SG to
find residential
parcels as ASR field
is deprecated

COMMERCIA
L BUILDINGS Community Analyst Dun & Bradstreet, via Esri

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-318
APPENDIX 2. HAZARD DATA SOURCES 2021
NAME SOURCES QUERY (IF ANY) NOTES (INCL. CREDITS)
Coastal
Storm/Erosion HYD_FLOODPL FLD_ZONE = 'VE' Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Dam Failure HYD_DAM_INUNDATION_DSO
D
California Office of Emergency
Services, County of San Diego,
Division of Safety of Dams
100-Year
Earthquake HAZUS, USGS
Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA; HAZUS); soil from
U.S. Geological Survey VS30 data -
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/a
pps/vs30/custom.php
500-Year
Earthquake HAZUS, USGS
Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA; HAZUS); soil from
U.S. Geological Survey VS30 data -
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/a
pps/vs30/custom.php
Probabilistic
Annualized
Earthquake

HAZUS, USGS
Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA; HAZUS); soil from
U.S. Geological Survey VS30 data -
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/a
pps/vs30/custom.php
Rose Canyon
M6.9 Scenario HAZUS, USGS U.S. Geological Survey- ShakeMaps 100-Year Flood HYD_FLOODPL FLOOD_PLAI = 'FP100' OR
FLOOD_PLAI = 'FW100'
Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA)
500-Year Flood HYD_FLOODPL FLOOD_PLAI = 'FP500' Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Rain-Induced
Landslide (High
Risk)
GEO_LANDSLIDE_CN
soil_slip_risk = 'High' OR
state_landslide_cat = 'Most
Susceptible' OR
GABRO_SLOPE = 'YES'
State of California, U.S. Geological
Survey, Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA;
HAZUS) and County of San Diego
Rain-Induced
Landslide
(Moderate Risk)
GEO_LANDSLIDE_CN
(soil_slip_risk = 'Moderate' OR
state_landslide_cat =
'Marginally Susceptible') AND
GABRO_SLOPE = ''
State of California, U.S. Geological
Survey, Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA;
HAZUS) and County of San Diego
Wildfire Hazard
Severity Zones
FIRE_HAZARD_SEVERITY_ZON
ES
Definition qeuried to only show
high and very high fire
zones
Used composite version provided
directly from CAL FIRE Fire
Resource Assessment Program
(FRAP) Team
Sea Level Rise
(Coastal
Flooding)
Areas inundated by unimpeded
Pacific coastal flooding under a
scenario of 1.4-meter (55-inch)
sea-level rise
Pacific Institute --
http://www2.pacinst.org/
Sea Level Rise
(MHHW)
Area inundated by mean higher
high water (MHHW) under 1.4-
meter (55-inch) sea-level rise
scenario
Pacific Institute --
http://www2.pacinst.org/
Tsunami HYD_TSUNAMI_INUNDATION_
AREA
California Emergency Management
Agency (CalEMA), University of
Southern California (USC) and
California Geological Survey (CGS)

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-319
APPENDIX 3. OTHER SOURCES/REFERENCES
ABAG Dam Failure Inundation Hazards Guide,
http://www.abag.ca.gov/bayarea/eqmaps/damfailure/dfguide.html Bainbridge, David 1997. The Flood Next Time. The San Diego Earth Times Web Page:
http://www.sdearthtimes.com/et1097/et1097s1.html
California Department of Boating and Waterways and SANDAG, 1994. Shoreline Erosion Assessment and Atlas of the San Diego Region, Volumes I and II. Edited by Reinhard E.

Flick, PhD.

California Earthquake History 1769-Present
Earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/sca/ca_eqs.php
City of Fort Collins Dam Failure Webpage, http://www.ci.fort-collins.co.us/oem/damfailure.php California Coastal Commission Draft Sea Level Rise Policy Guidance (2013) http://www.coastal.ca.gov/climate/slr/guidance/CCC_Draft_SLR_Guidance_PR_101420

13.pdf
California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology 1990. Planning Scenario for a Major Earthquake, San Diego-Tijuana Metropolitan Area. Special Publication 100.

California Department of Water Resources, Dam Safety,
http://www.water.ca.gov/damsaefty/docs/fault.pdf
California Environmental Protection Agency and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, 2013. “Indicators of Climate Change in California.” Climate Education Partners, 2014. “San Diego, 2050 Is Calling. How Will We Answer?” County of San Diego, Department of Sanitation and Flood Control. Storms in San Diego County.

FEMA 2002. State and Local Mitigation Planning How-to Guide. September 2002, FEMA 386-1.

FEMA 1999. HAZUS 99 Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology User Manual-ArcView.

Developed by FEMA through arrangements with National Institute of Building Sciences.

Frankel, Arthur, Mueller, Charles, Barnhard, Theodore, Perkins, David, Leyendecker, E.V., Dickman, Nancy, Hanson, Stanley, and Hopper, Margaret, 1997, Seismic-hazard maps for the conterminous United States, Map C - Horizontal Peak Acceleration with 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-131- C.
http://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/eq/html/data.html
Garfin, G., G. Franco, H. Blanco, A. Comrie, P. Gonzalez, T. Piechota, R. Smyth, and R.

Waskom, 2014: Ch. 20: Southwest. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, J. M. Melillo, Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and G. W.

Yohe, Eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program, 462-486. doi:10.7930/J08G8HMN.

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-320
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 2003. Interim Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance for California Local Governments. Prepared for the DRC April 21-23, 2003.

Hawk, R.N., and Christiansen, T.P., 1991, City of San Diego Ordinances and Regulations with Respect to Geotechnical and Geological Hazards, in Environmental Perils, San Diego Region, Abbott, P.L., and Elliott, W.J., editors, San Diego Association of Geologists
Higbee, Melissa, Daniel Cayan, Sam Iacobellis, Mary Tyree (2014). Report from San Diego Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Training Workshop #1: Climate Change and Hazards in San Diego. ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability. Accessed July 7, 2014. http://www.icleiusa.org/library/documents/training-workshop-report/view Institute for Business and Life Safety, Tampa FL, July 2008 Mega Fires: The Case for Mitigation, The Witch Creek Fire, October 21-31, 2007
IPCC, 2013: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M.

Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)].

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

Leighton & Associates, 1983, Seismic Safety Study for the City of San Diego, City of San Diego General Plan
Journal of San Diego History 2002. Dry Rivers, Dammed Rivers and Floods: An Early History of the Struggle Between Droughts and Floods in San Diego. Winter 2002, Volume 48, Number 1. http://www.sandiegohistory.org/journal/2002-1/hill.htm National Association of Counties April 2009. “A Snapshot of the Impact of the Recession on Large, Urban Counties”.

Office of Emergency Services 2014. Unified San Diego County Emergency Services Organization Operational Area Emergency Plan.

San Diego’s Changing Climate: A Regional Wake-Up Call. A Summary of the Focus 2050 Study Presented by The San Diego Foundation
San Diego Natural History Museum Web Page 2003. Faults and Earthquakes in San Diego County. Thomas A. Demere, Ph.D: Curator of Paleontology. http://www.sdnhm.org/research/paleontology/sdfaults.html Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future (2012). http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13389 South Carolina Emergency Management Division. South Carolina Emergency Operations Plan Appendix 4 South Carolina Dam Failure and Preparedness Plan. February 2009 Stroh, Robert C. editor., 2001: Coastal processes and Engineering Geology of San Diego, California, San Diego Association of Geologists, Sunbelt Publications U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1993.

Tsunamis affecting the West Coast of the United States 1806-1992. KGRD 29.

Walsh, J., D. Wuebbles, K. Hayhoe, J. Kossin, K. Kunkel, G. Stephens, P. Thorne, R. Vose, M. Wehner, J. Willis, D. Anderson, S. Doney, R. Feely, P. Hennon, V. Kharin, T.

Knutson, F. Landerer, T. Lenton, J. Kennedy, and R. Somerville, 2014: Ch. 2: Our Changing Climate. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-321
Climate Assessment, J. M. Melillo, Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, Eds., U.S.

Global Change Research Program, 19-67. doi:10.7930/J0KW5CXT.

APPENDIX 4. SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY REFERENCES,

UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
Aguilera, R., Gershunov, A., & Benmarhnia, T. (2019). Atmospheric rivers impact California’s coastal water quality via extreme precipitation. Science of The Total Environment, 671, 488–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.318 Aguilera, R., Gershunov, A., Ilango, S. D., Guzman-Morales, J., & Benmarhnia, T. (2020a).

Santa Ana Winds of Southern California Impact PM2.5 With and Without Smoke From Wildfires. GeoHealth, 4(1), e2019GH000225.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000225
Aguilera, R., Hansen, K., Gershunov, A., Ilango, S., Sheridan, P., and Benmarhnia, T. (2020).

Respiratory Hospitalizations and Wildfire Smoke: A spatio-temporal analysis of an extreme firestorm in San Diego County, California. Environmental Epidemiology, 4, doi:

10.1097/EE9.0000000000000114.

Aguilera, R., Corringham, T., Gershunov A., and Benmarhnia, T., (2021). Wildfire smoke impacts respiratory health much more than fine particles from other sources:
observational evidence from Southern California. Nature Communications. 12:1493, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21708.

Aguilera, R., Corringham, T., Gershunov, A., Leibel S., and Benmarhnia, T. (2021). Fine Particles in Wildfire Smoke and Pediatric Respiratory Health in California. Pediatrics. 147(4):e2020027128.

Analitis, A., Michelozzi, P., D’Ippoliti, D., de’Donato, F., Menne, B., Matthies, F., Atkinson, R.

W., Iñiguez, C.,
Basagaña, X., Schneider, A., Lefranc, A., Paldy, A., Bisanti, L., & Katsouyanni, K. (2014). Effects of Heat Waves on Mortality: Effect Modification and Confounding by Air Pollutants. Epidemiology, 25(1), 15–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24759018 Barnard, P. L., Hoover, D., Hubbard, D. M., Snyder, A., Ludka, B. C., Allan, J., Kaminsky, G.

M., Ruggiero, P., Gallien, T. W., Gabel, L., McCandless, D., Weiner, H. M., Cohn, N., Anderson, D. L., & Serafin, K. A. (2017). Extreme oceanographic forcing and coastal response due to the 2015–2016 El Niño. Nature Communications, 8, 14365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14365
Basu, R. (2009). High ambient temperature and mortality: a review of epidemiologic studies from 2001 to 2008. Environmental Health, 8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-8- 40 Bouchama, A., Dehbi, M., Mohamed, G., Matthies, F., Shoukri, M., & Menne, B. (2007).

Prognostic Factors in Heat Wave–Related Deaths: A Meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167(20), 2170–2176. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.20.ira70009 Bromirski, P. D., Miller, A. J., & Flick, R. E. (2012). Understanding North Pacific sea level trends. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 93(27), 249–251. https://doi.org/doi:10.1029/2012EO270001

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-322
Bromirski, P. D., Miller, A. J., Flick, R. E., & Auad, G. (2011). Dynamical suppression of sea level rise along the Pacific coast of North America: Indications for imminent acceleration.

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 116(C7).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006759
Burillo, D., Chester, M., Pincetl, S., Fournier, E., Reich, K., & Hall., A. (2018). Climate Change in Los Angeles County: Grid Vulnerability to Extreme Heat. In California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Burillo, D., Chester, M. v, Pincetl, S., Fournier, E. D., & Reyna, J. (2019). Forecasting peak electricity demand for Los Angeles considering higher air temperatures due to climate change. Applied Energy, 236, 1–9.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.039 Cao, Q., Gershunov, A., Shulgina, T., Ralph, F. M., Sun, N., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2020).

Floods due to Atmospheric Rivers along the U.S. West Coast: The Role of Antecedent Soil Moisture in a Warming Climate. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 21(8), 1827– 1845. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0242.1
Cayan, D. R., Bromirski, P. D., Hayhoe, K., Tyree, M., Dettinger, M. D., & Flick, R. E. (2008).

Climate change projections of sea level extremes along the California coast. Climatic Change, 87, S57–S73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9376-7 Clemesha, R. E. S., Guirguis, K., Gershunov, A., Small, I. J., & Tardy, A. (2018a). California heat waves: their spatial evolution, variation, and coastal modulation by low clouds.

Climate Dynamics, 50(11), 4285–4301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017- 3875-7 Clemesha, R. E. S., Gershunov, A., Iacobellis, S. F., & Cayan, D. R. (2017). Daily variability of California coastal low cloudiness: A balancing act between stability and subsidence.

Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073075 Clemesha, R. E. S., Gershunov, A., Iacobellis, S. F., Williams, A., & Cayan, D. R. (2016). The northward March of summer low cloudiness along the California coast. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(3), 1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067081 Corringham, T. W., Ralph, F. M., Gershunov, A., Cayan, D. R., & Talbot, C. A. (2019).

Atmospheric rivers drive flood damages in the western United States. Science Advances, 5(12), eaax4631. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax4631 Crosby, S. C., Cornuelle, B. D., O’Reilly, W. C., & Guza, R. T. (2017). Assimilating Global Wave Model Predictions and Deep- Water Wave Observations in Nearshore Swell Predictions. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 34(8), 1823–1836. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0003.1
Crosby, S. C., O’Reilly, W. C., & Guza, R. T. (2016). Modeling Long-Period Swell in Southern California: Practical Boundary Conditions from Buoy Observations and Global Wave Model Predictions. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 33(8), 1673–1690. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0038.1
Dettinger, M., & Cayan, D. (2014). Drought and the California Delta—A Matter of Extremes.

San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 12(2), 6p. https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2014v12iss2art4
Dettinger, M. D., Ralph, F. M., Das, T., Neiman, P. J., & Cayan, D. R. (2011). Atmospheric Rivers, Floods and the Water Resources of California. Water, 3(4), 445–478. https://doi.org/10.3390/w3020445

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-323
Diehl, P. (2015, October 15). Solana Beach, Encinitas OK sand replenishment. San Diego Union Tribune. http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/environment/sdut-solanabeach-encinitas-ok-sand-replenishment-2015oct15- story.html Doria, A., Guza, R. T., O’Reilly, W. C., & Yates, M. L. (2016). Observations and modeling of San Diego beaches during El Niño.

Continental Shelf Research, 124, 153–164.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2016.05.008 Fiedler, J. W., Smit, P. B., Brodie, K. L., McNinch, J., & Guza, R. T. (2018). Numerical modeling of wave runup on steep and mildly sloping natural beaches. Coastal Engineering, 131, 106–113.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.09.004 Fiedler, J. W., Young, A. P., Ludka, B. C., O’Reilly, W. C., Henderson, C., Merrifield, M. A., & Guza, R. T. (2020). Predicting site- specific storm wave run-up. Natural Hazards, 104(1), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04178-3
Flick, R. E. (1998). Comparison of California Tides, Storm Surges, and Sea Level During the El Niño Winters of 1982-83 and 1997-

98. Shore and Beach, 66(3), 7–11.

Franklin, J. (2010). Vegetation dynamics and exotic plant invasion following high severity crown fire in a southern California conifer forest. Plant Ecology, 207(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9672-6
Gershunov, A., Cayan, D. R., & Iacobellis, S. F. (2009). The Great 2006 Heat Wave over California and Nevada: Signal of an Increasing Trend. Journal of Climate, 22(23), 6181– 6203. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2465.1
Gershunov, A., & Guirguis, K. (2012). California heat waves in the present and future.

Geophysical Research Letters, 39(18).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052979
Gershunov, A., Shulgina, T., Clemesha, R. E. S., Guirguis, K., Pierce, D. W., Dettinger, M.

D., Lavers, D. A., Cayan, D. R., Polade,
S. D., Kalansky, J., & Ralph, F. M. (2019). Precipitation regime change in Western North America: The role of Atmospheric Rivers. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46169-w
Gershunov, A., J. Guzman Morales, B. Hatchett, R. Aguilera, T. Shulgina, K. Guirguis, J.

Abatzoglou, D. Cayan, D. Pierce, P. Williams, I. Small, R. Clemesha, L. Schwarz, T.

Benmarhnia, A. Tardy, 2021: Hot and cold flavors of southern California’s Santa Ana winds: Their causes, trends, and links with wildfire. Climate Dynamics. DOI:

10.1007/s00382-021-05802-z.

Griggs, G., Árvai, J., Cayan, D., DeConto, R., Fox, J., Fricker, H., Kopp, R., Tebaldi, C., & Whiteman, E. (2017). Rising Seas in California, An Update on Seal _level Rise Science.

Guirguis, K., Basu, R., Al-Delaimy, W. K., Benmarhnia, T., Clemesha, R. E. S., Corcos, I., Guzman-Morales, J., Hailey, B., Small, I., Tardy, A., Vashishtha, D., Zivin, J. G., & Gershunov, A. (2018). Heat, disparities, and health outcomes in San Diego County’s diverse climate zones. GeoHealth, 2. https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2017GH000127

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-324
Guirguis, Kristen, Gershunov, A., Cayan, D. R., & Pierce, D. W. (2018). Heat wave probability in the changing climate of the Southwest US. Climate Dynamics, 50(9–10), 3853–3864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3850-3
Guirguis, Kristen, Gershunov, A., Tardy, A., & Basu, R. (2014). The Impact of Recent Heat Waves on Human Health in California.

Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 53(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMCD-13-0130.1 Guzman-Morales, J., & Gershunov, A. (2019). Climate Change Suppresses Santa Ana Winds of Southern California and Sharpens Their Seasonality. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(5), 2772–2780. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080261 Guzman-Morales, J., Gershunov, A., Theiss, J., Li, H., & Cayan, D. (2016). Santa Ana Winds of Southern California: Their climatology, extremes, and behavior spanning six and a half decades. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(6), 2827–2834. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL067887
Hamlington, B D, Cheon, S. H., Thompson, P. R., Merrifield, M. A., Nerem, R. S., Leben, R.

R., & Kim, K. ‐Y. (2016). An ongoing shift in Pacific Ocean sea level. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 121(7), 5084–5097.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC011815
Hamlington, Benjamin D, Piecuch, C. G., Reager, J. T., Chandanpurkar, H., Frederikse, T., Nerem, R. S., Fasullo, J. T., & Cheon, S.-
H. (2020). Origin of interannual variability in global mean sea level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(25), 13983.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922190117
Hughes, M., & Hall, A. (2010). Local and synoptic mechanisms causing Southern California’s Santa Ana winds. Climate Dynamics, 34(6), 847–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382- 009-0650-4
Iacobellis, S. F., & Cayan, D. R. (2013). The variability of California summertime marine stratus: Impacts on surface air temperatures. Journal of Geophysical Research:

Atmospheres, 118(16), 9105–9122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50652 Ilango, S. D., Weaver, M., Sheridan, P., Schwarz, L., Clemesha, R. E. S., Bruckner, T., Basu, R., Gershunov, A., & Benmarhnia, T. (2020). Extreme heat episodes and risk of preterm birth in California, 2005–2013. Environment International, 137, 105541. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105541 Jennings, M. K., Cayan, D., Kalansky, J., Pairis, A. D., Lawson, D. M., Syphard, A. D., Abeysekera, U., Clemesha, R. E. S., Gershunov, A., Guirguis, K., Randall, J. M., Stein, E. D., & Vanderplank, S. (2018). San Diego County Ecosystems: Ecological Impacts Of Climate Change On A Biodiversity Hotspot. In California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, California Energy Commission. California Energy Commission.

Kalansky, J., Cayan, D., Barba, K., Walsh, L., Brouwer, K., & Boudreau, D. (2018). San Diego Summary Report. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, Publication number: SUM-CCCA4-2018-009.

Knowlton, K., Rotkin-Ellman, M., King, G., Margolis, H. G., Smith, D., Solomon, G., Trent, R., & English, P. (2009). The 2006 California Heat Wave: Impacts on Hospitalizations and

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-325
Emergency Department Visits. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(1). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11594
Ludka, B. C., Gallien, T. W., Crosby, S. C., & Guza, R. T. (2016). Mid‐El Niño erosion at nourished and unnourished Southern California beaches. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(9), 4510–4516. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/2016GL068612 Ludka, B. C., Guza, R. T., & O’Reilly, W. C. (2018). Nourishment evolution and impacts at four southern California beaches: A sand volume analysis. Coastal Engineering, 136, 96–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.02.003 Ludka, B. C., Guza, R. T., O’Reilly, W. C., Merrifield, M. A., Flick, R. E., Bak, A. S., Hesser, T., Bucciarelli, R., Olfe, C., Woodward, B., Boyd, W., Smith, K., Okihiro, M., Grenzeback, R., Parry, L., & Boyd, G. (2019). Sixteen years of bathymetry and waves at San Diego beaches. Scientific Data, 6(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0167-6 Ludka, B. C., Guza, R. T., O’Reilly, W. C., & Yates, M. L. (2015). Field evidence of beach profile evolution toward equilibrium.

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(11), 7574–7597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010893 Malig, B. J., Wu, X. (May), Guirguis, K., Gershunov, A., & Basu, R. (2019). Associations between ambient temperature and
hepatobiliary and renal hospitalizations in California, 1999 to 2009. Environmental Research, 177, 108566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108566 McElroy, S., Schwarz, L., Green, H., Corcos, I., Guirguis, K., Gershunov, A., & Benmarhnia, T. (2020). Defining heat waves and extreme heat events using sub-regional meteorological data to maximize benefits of early warning systems to population health.

Science of The Total Environment, 721, 137678.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137678 McEvoy, D., Pierce, D., Kalansky, J., Cayan, D., & Abatzoglou, J. (2020). Projected Changes in Reference Evapotranspiration in California and Nevada: Implications for Drought and Wildland Fire Danger. Earth’s Future.

Mohegh, A., Levinson, R., Taha, H., Gilbert, H., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Tang, T., & Ban-Weiss, G. (2018). Observational Evidence of Neighborhood Scale Reductions in Air Temperature Associated with Increases in Roof Albedo. Climate, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6040098
Ostro, B. D., Roth, L. A., Green, R. S., & Basu, R. (2009). Estimating the mortality effect of the July 2006 California heat wave.

Environmental Research, 109(5), 614–619.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2009.03.010 Parker, V. T., Pratt, R. B., & Keeley, J. E. (2016). Chaparral editors. Ecosystems of California. . In H. Mooney & E. Zavaleta (Eds.), Ecosystems of California (Chaparral, pp. 479–507). University of California Press.

Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Das, T., Maurer, E. P., Miller, N. L., Bao, Y., Kanamitsu, M., Yoshimura, K., Snyder, M. A., Sloan, L. C., Franco, G., & Tyree, M. (2013). The Key Role of Heavy Precipitation Events in Climate Model Disagreements of Future Annual Precipitation Changes in California. Journal of Climate, 26(16), 5879–5896. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00766.1

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-326
Pierce, D. W., Kalansky, J. F., & Cayan, D. (2018). Climate, Drought, and Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the Fourth California Climate Assessment.

Polade, S. D., Gershunov, A., Cayan, D. R., Dettinger, M. D., & Pierce, D. W. (2017).

Precipitation in a warming world: Assessing projected hydro-climate changes in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11285-y
Polade, S. D., Pierce, D. W., Cayan, D. R., Gershunov, A., & Dettinger, M. D. (2014). The key role of dry days in changing regional climate and precipitation regimes. Scientific Reports, 4, 4364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep04364
Schinasi, L. H., Benmarhnia, T., & de Roos, A. J. (2018). Modification of the association between high ambient temperature and health by urban microclimate indicators: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res, 161, 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.004
Schwartz, R. (2015). California coastal low clouds: Variability and influences across climate to weather and continental to local scales. University of California, San Diego.

Schwarz L., Malig, B.J., Guzman-Morales, J., Guirguis, K., Ilango, S.D., Sheridan, P., Gershunov, A., Basu, R., and Benmarhnia, T. (2020) The health burden of fall, winter and spring heat waves in Southern California and contribution of Santa Ana Winds.

Environ Res Letters. 15, 054017.

Sias-Daniel, J., Jacobs, J. M., Douglas, E., Mallick, R. B., & Hayhoe, K. (2014, May 3).

Impact of Climate Change on Pavement Performance: Preliminary Lessons Learned through the Infrastructure and Climate Network (ICNet). Climatic Effects on Pavement and Geotech.

Syphard, A. D., Brennan, T. J., & Keeley, J. E. (2018). Chaparral Landscape Conversion in Southern California. In E. C. Underwood,
H. D. Safford, N. A. Molinari, & J. E. Keeley (Eds.), Valuing Chaparral: Ecological, SocioEconomic, and Management Perspectives (pp. 323–346). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68303-4_12 Venturas, M. D., MacKinnon, E. D., Dario, H. L., Jacobsen, A. L., Pratt, R. B., & Davis, S. D. (2016). Chaparral shrub hydraulic traits, size, and life history types relate to species mortality during California’s historic drought of 2014. PloS ONE, 11(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159145
Williams, A. P., Abatzoglou, J. T., Gershunov, A., Guzman-Morales, J., Bishop, D. A., Balch, J. K., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2019).

Observed Impacts of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Wildfire in California. Earth’s Future, 7(8), 892–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001210 Williams, A. P., Cook, E. R., Smerdon, J. E., Cook, B. I., Abatzoglou, J. T., Bolles, K., Baek, S. H., Badger, A. M., & Livneh, B. (2020). Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science, 368(6488), 314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9600
Williams, A. P., Seager, R., Abatzoglou, J. T., Cook, B. I., Smerdon, J. E., & Cook, E. R. (2015). Contribution of anthropogenic warming to California drought during 2012–2014.

Geophysical Research Letters, 42(16), 6819–6828.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064924

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-327
Yates, M. L., Guza, R. T., & O’Reilly, W. C. (2009). Equilibrium shoreline response:

Observations and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 114(C9). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005359
Yates, M. L., Guza, R. T., O’Reilly, W. C., Hansen, J. E., & Barnard, P. L. (2011). Equilibrium shoreline response of a high wave energy beach. Journal of Geophysical Research:

Oceans, 116(C4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006681 Young, A P, Guza, R. T., Matsumoto, H., Merrifield, M. A., O’Reilly, W. C., & Swirad, Z. M. (2021). Three years of weekly observations of coastal cliff erosion by waves and rainfall.

Geomorphology, 375, 107545.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107545 Young, A.P. (2015). Recent deep-seated coastal landsliding at San Onofre State Beach, California. Geomorphology, 228, 200–212.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.08.005 Young, A. P. (2018). Decadal-scale coastal cliff retreat in southern and central California.

Geomorphology, 300, 164–175.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.010 Young, A. P, Raymond, J. H., Sorenson, J., Johnstone, E. A., Driscoll, N. W., Flick, R. E., & Guza, R. T. (2010). Coarse Sediment Yields from Seacliff Erosion in the Oceanside Littoral Cell. Journal of Coastal Research, 580–585. https://doi.org/10.2112/08- 1179.1 Zetler, B. D., & Flick, R. E. (1985). Predicted Extreme High Tides for Mixed-Tide Regimes.

Journal of Physical Oceanography, 15(3), 357–359. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520- 0485(1985)015<0357:pehtfm>2.0.co;2

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-328
APPENDIX 5. SURVEY RESULTS FOR SD MULTIJURISDICTIONAL HAZARD

MITIGATION PLAN REVISION
There were 500 respondents for this anonymous survey. Of those respondents:
 182 provided their e-mail address
QUESTION 1
All the 500 Respondents provided the cities or communities in which they live and work.

Although there were respondents from all areas of the county:
 11% of respondents claimed East County residency
 59% of respondents claimed North County residency
 30% of respondents claimed Central and Western County residency QUESTION 2
Would you prefer emergency messages in a language other than English?  7% - Yes
 93% - No
QUESTION 3
If ordered to evacuate, how much time would you require?  23% - 30 minutes or less
 39% - 30 minutes to one hour
 27% - one hour to two hours
 11% - greater than two hours
QUESTION 4
Have you developed a personal disaster plan?
 17% - Yes, for myself
 35% - Yes, for myself and others
 48% - No
QUESTION 5
Have you ever experienced or been impacted by a disaster?  45% - Yes
 55% - No

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-329
QUESTION 6
If yes [to Question 5], please explain.
 226 Responses
QUESTION 7
Have you taken any actions to make your home, business, or neighborhood more resistant to hazards?
 54% - Yes
 46% - No
QUESTION 8
If yes [to Question 7], please explain.
 257 Responses
QUESTION 9
Have you accessed the online “Know Your Hazards” tool to determine what types of disasters are most likely to occur in your community?
 24% - Yes
 76% - No
QUESTION 10
Please select one hazard you think is the highest threat to your neighborhood.  49.49% - Structure/Wild Land Fires
 23.34% - Earthquake
 4.62% - Drought
 5.63% - Climate change
 2.21% - Coastal Storms/Erosion
 0.20% - Tsunami
 4.02% - Extreme heat
 1.40% - Pandemic
 0.20% - Landslide
 0.60% - Severe Winter Storm
 0.20% - Terrorism
 1.40% - Extreme Wind
 0.60% - Nuclear accident
 0.20% - Hazardous Materials Incident

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-330
 0.60% - Dam Failure
 0.80% - Flood
 0.60% - Oil or Gas line failure
 0.40% - Liquefaction.
 3.21% - Other
QUESTION 11
Please select one hazard you think is the second highest threat to your neighborhood.  16.22% - Structure/Wild Land Fires
 30.22% - Earthquake
 11.56% - Drought
 11.56% - Climate change
 1.41% - Coastal Storms/Erosion
 1.21% - Tsunami
 4.26% - Extreme heat
 3.04% - Pandemic
 2.23% - Landslide
 1.62% - Severe Winter Storm
 1.62% - Terrorism
 4.05% - Extreme Wind
 1.41% - Nuclear accident
 0.81% - Hazardous Materials Incident
 0.20% - Dam Failure
 1.62% - Flood
 2.43% - Oil or Gas line failure
 0.00% - Liquefaction.
 2.83% - Other
QUESTION 12
What is the most effective way for you to receive information about how to make your home, business, or neighborhood more resistant to hazards?
 0.08% - Newspaper
 44.64% - Email
 4.24% - Television
 3.43% - Public Workshops/Meetings
 1.01% - Radio
 20.40% - Internet
 7.27% - Mail

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-331
 11.31% - Social Media
 6.86% - Other
QUESTION 13
Have you hardened your home against flying embers?
 31% - Yes
 69% - No
QUESTION 14
Have you created defensible space around your home?
 54% - Yes
 25% - No
 20% - N/A
QUESTION 15
Have you designated an emergency contact outside of your home if the family should become separated?
 57% - Yes
 43% - No
QUESTION 16
Have you been trained in First Aid and CPR?
 60% - Yes, both First Aid and CPR
 4% - Yes, just First Aid
 11% - Yes, just CPR
 25% - No
QUESTION 17
Do you keep extra prescription drugs on hand in the case of an emergency?  57% - Yes
 43% - No
QUESTION 18
Do you know how to protect yourself and others from being exposed to a virus?  96% - Yes
 4% - No

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-332

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-333
QUESTION 19
Are you familiar with the services offered at a Family Assistance Center following a mass casualty incident?
 21% - Yes
 79% - No
QUESTION 20
How likely are you to stay in an emergency shelter following a disaster?  4% - Definitely
 9% - Very Probably
 22% - Probably
 59% - Probably Not
 6% - Definitely Not
QUESTION 21
Are you aware of how to safely dispose of household hazardous waste in your home? (i.e., used oil, old batteries, expired pesticides)
 82% - Yes
 18% - No
QUESTION 22
Has a Wireless Emergency Alert on your mobile phone ever made you take an emergency action?
 38% - Yes
 62% - No
QUESTION 23
Have you ever contacted 9-1-1?
 68% - Yes, by phone
 <1% - Yes, by text
 1% - Yes, by phone and text
 31% - No
QUESTION 24
Do you know how to shut off the gas, electricity, and water to your home following an earthquake?

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-334
 68% - Yes
 32% - No
QUESTION 25
Do you have an emergency go-kit?
 51% - Yes
 49% - No
QUESTION 26
Do you have enough supplies to shelter in place at home for three days without functioning utilities?
 80% - Yes
 20% - No
QUESTION 27
Have you downloaded SD Emergency, the County’s disaster preparedness mobile application?
 49% - Yes
 51% - No
QUESTION 28
Have you registered your mobile phone and email for AlertSanDiego, the County’s regional mass notification system?
 73% - Yes
 27% - No
QUESTION 29
Do you feel prepared to cope with the aftermath of disasters?  59% - Yes
 41% - No
QUESTION 30
Do you have an emergency action plan which includes details for handling pets, large animals, and livestock?
 36% - Yes, just for pets
 5% - Yes, for pets, large animals, and livestock
 1% - No, for large animals and livestock

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-335
 21% - No
 37% - I do not have animals
QUESTION 31
Have you located two places where you can send or safely evacuate your pets?  37% - Yes
 63% - No
QUESTION 32
Have you identified at least two places to meet in the event of an emergency: near the home and outside the immediate area?
 38% - Yes
 62% - No
QUESTION 33
Do you know the difference between an “Evacuation Warning” and an “Evacuation Order”?  90% - Yes
 10% - No
QUESTION 34
How likely are you to evacuate if you receive an “Evacuation Warning” which directs you to prepare to evacuate and to evacuate early?
 22% - Definitely
 31% - Very Probably
 29% - Probably
 16% - Probably Not
 2% - Definitely Not
QUESTION 35
How likely are you to evacuate if you receive an “Evacuation Order” which directs you to evacuate immediately?
 75% - Definitely
 17% - Very Probably
 6% - Probably
 2% - Probably Not
 <1% - Definitely Not

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-336
QUESTION 36
In your opinion, what are some steps your local government could take to reduce or eliminate the risk of future hazard damages?
 284 Respondents
QUESTION 37
Are there any other issues regarding the reduction of risk and loss associated with hazards or disasters in the community that you think are important?  188 Respondents
QUESTION 38
If you are interested in receiving an invitation to a public meeting to review the results of this survey, please provide you email below?
 188 Respondents

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-337
APPENDIX 6. MEETINGS
MEETING 1. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ORIENTATION MEETING
September 2019 / Time / Location

1. Introductions / Welcome

2. Overview of the Mitigation Plan

3. Review of Planning Process
a. Current Scheduled Meetings
b. Due Dates

4. Overview of new Mitigation Tools
a. SurveyMonkey FEMA Worksheets
b. Action Plan Assessments
c. Hazard Mitigation Action Tracker

5. City / Jurisdiction Specific Planning

6. County Resilience Program

7. Changes to be Instituted

8. Questions / Comments

9. Adjourn
MEETING 2.

NAME JURISDICTION/ AGENCY EMAIL INITIAL
Johnson, Donna PHPR [email protected] X
Nissen, Dave SD County Fire Authority [email protected] Prus, Lisa SDCWA [email protected] X
Millstein, Mel LUEG [email protected]
Efird, Robert PDS [email protected]
Nicoletti, Vince PDS [email protected]
George, Richard Sheriff’s EPD [email protected] Willis, Cleve Sheriff’s EPD [email protected]
Files, Shannon Sheriff’s EPD [email protected] Batchelor, Jason PDS [email protected]
Dawes, Ian PDS [email protected]
Burton, Todd HIRT [email protected] X
Agahi, Sara DPW (Flood Control) [email protected] X Isabel Corcos PHS [email protected] X
Rob Sills PHPR [email protected] X
Audrey Hamiliton PDS [email protected]
Craig Shaffer SD County Fire Authority [email protected]

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-338
MEETING 3. MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE 2014 WORKING GROUP MEETING # 4
MEETING 4.

NAME JURISDICTION/ AGENCY EMAIL INITIAL
Walter Amedee National City [email protected]
v
Marlon King Chula Vista [email protected]
Susy Turnbull Poway [email protected] X
Jamie Smith Vista [email protected]

NAME JURISDICTION/ AGENCY TELEPHON
E
EMAIL
Ryan DeHart San Diego OES 858-565-
5590
[email protected]
v
Walter
Amedee
National City 619-207-
7342
[email protected]
v
Marlon King Chula Vista 619-737-
6477
[email protected]
Susy Turnbull Poway 619-630-
6778
[email protected]
Jamie Mott Vista 619-672-
9376
[email protected]
Andy McKellar El Cajon, La Mesa, Lemon
Grove
619-227-
2897
[email protected]
Corina
Jimenez
Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana
Beach
760-519-
7959
[email protected]
Sarah Gordon SD County Communications
Office
[email protected]
.gov
Dave Pender San Marcos 760-533-
1634
[email protected]
David Harrison Carlsbad 760-484-
0247
David.Harrison@carlsbadca.
gov
John Garlow Santee 619-871-
9910
[email protected]
Jeff Pack San Diego 619-533-
6787
[email protected]
Perry Peake Coronado 619-726-
7829
[email protected]
Jeff Murdock Escondido 760-703-
3046
[email protected]
John French Imperial Beach 619-423-
8225
[email protected]
v
Neil Anderson Oceanside 760-518-
1877
[email protected].
us
Yvette LaDuke Tsunami
Alex Tardy Storm / Tsunami / Wildfire

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-339

NAME JURISDICTION/ AGENCY EMAIL INITIAL
Andy McKellar El Cajon, La Mesa, Lemon
Grove
[email protected]
Corina Jimenez Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana
Beach
[email protected] X
Patricia Letts Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana
Beach
[email protected] X
Lois Yum Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana
Beach
[email protected] X
Clem Brown Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana
Beach
[email protected] X
Rimga Viskanta Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana
Beach
[email protected] X
Dave Pender San Marcos [email protected]
Don Rawson Carlsbad [email protected]
v
X
David Harrison Carlsbad David.Harrison@carlsbadca.
gov
Justin Matsushita Santee jmatsushita@cityofsanteeca.
gov
DeVerna Rogers Santee [email protected]
Hannah
Chasteene
San Diego [email protected] X
Eugene Ruzzini San Diego [email protected]
Jeffrey Terwilliger Coronado [email protected] Jeff Murdock Escondido [email protected] X
John French Imperial Beach [email protected]
v
X
David Parsons Oceanside [email protected]
Pete Lawrence Oceanside [email protected]
g
Brown, Matt Port of San Diego [email protected] X Croucher, Gary San Miguel FPD [email protected]
Fred Cox Rancho Santa FE FPD [email protected]
McBroom, Jason Alpine FPD [email protected] X
Villarreal, Leonard San Miguel FPD [email protected] Larry Costello Padre Dam MWD [email protected] X
Dambach, Dan Vista Irrigation District [email protected] Levion, Diana Padre Dam MWD [email protected]
Del Bosque, Erick Sweetwater Authority [email protected] Olson, Gabriela Valley Center MWD [email protected]
Prus. Lisa SDCWA [email protected]
Sorce, Lisa Padre Dam MWD [email protected]

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-340

NAME JURISDICTION/ AGENCY EMAIL INITIAL
Williams, Dennis Valley Center MWD [email protected]
Woolslayer,
Trisha
Vallecitos WD [email protected]
Pedrazzi, Ed Vallecitos WD [email protected]
Newman, Richard Alpine Union School District [email protected] MEETING 7. 1/11/2021

NAME JURISDICTION/

AGENCY EMAIL INITIAL
Ponce, Cruz CalOES [email protected] X
McCready-Hoover,
Karen CalOES Karen.McCready[email protected] X
LaMar-Haas,
Victoria CalOES [email protected]
Landry, Carly CalOES [email protected]
Sutkus, Adam CalOES [email protected]
Riley Kelly CalOES [email protected]
Flores, Salvador Imperial County [email protected] Brown, Ethan Orange County [email protected]
Phelps, Nikki DHS [email protected] X
Mielish, Robert DHS [email protected] X
Liu, Xing FEMA Region 9 [email protected]
Tardy, Alex NWS / NOAA [email protected]
Anna Lowe SANDAG [email protected] X
Ian Clampett Scripps
Oceanography [email protected]

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-341
MEETING 11.

Full Name User Action Timestamp
DeHart, Ryan Joined 4/12/2021, 12:55:26 PM
Files, Shannon Joined 4/12/2021, 12:56:21 PM
Khalili, Mehdi Joined 4/12/2021, 12:56:31 PM
Johnson, Donna L Joined 4/12/2021, 12:58:15 PM
Schmid, Matthew Joined 4/12/2021, 12:58:36 PM
Burton, Todd Joined 4/12/2021, 12:58:50 PM
Schaffer, Craig Joined 4/12/2021, 12:59:19 PM
Agahi, Sara Joined 4/12/2021, 1:00:35 PM
Madrid, Michael Joined 4/12/2021, 1:01:02 PM
Prus, Lisa Joined 4/12/2021, 1:09:21 PM
Julien, Jo Ann Joined 4/12/2021, 1:09:36 PM
MEETING 12. 4/26/2022

NAME JURISDICTION/ AGENCY EMAIL INITIA
L
Walter Amedee National City [email protected]
ov
Marlon King Chula Vista [email protected]
Susy Turnbull Poway [email protected]
Jamie Smith Vista [email protected]
Andy McKellar El Cajon, La Mesa, Lemon Grove [email protected] t
Corina Jimenez Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana Beach [email protected] X Patricia Letts Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana Beach [email protected] X Lois Yum Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana Beach [email protected] X Clem Brown Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana Beach [email protected] X Rimga Viskanta Encinitas, Del Mar, Solana Beach [email protected] X Dave Pender San Marcos [email protected] X
Don Rawson Carlsbad [email protected]
ov
X
David Harrison Carlsbad David.Harrison@carlsbadc
a.gov
Justin Matsushita Santee jmatsushita@cityofsanteec
a.gov
DeVerna Rogers Santee DRogers@cityofsanteec
a.gov

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-342
Hannah
Chasteene
San Diego [email protected]
v
X
Eugene Ruzzini San Diego [email protected]
Jeffrey Terwilliger Coronado [email protected] s
Jeff Murdock Escondido [email protected]
John French Imperial Beach [email protected]
ov
X
Russ
Cunningham
Oceanside RCunningham@oceanside
ca.org
David Parsons Oceanside [email protected]
g
Pete Lawrence Oceanside PLawrence@oceansideca.
org
David Foster Port of San Diego [email protected] g
X
Tesoro, Cid Port of San Diego ctesoro@portofsandiego
.org
Croucher, Gary San Miguel FPD [email protected]
Fred Cox Rancho Santa FE FPD [email protected]
McBroom, Jason Alpine FPD [email protected] X
Villarreal,
Leonard
San Miguel FPD [email protected]
Larry Costello Padre Dam MWD [email protected] X
Dambach, Dan Vista Irrigation District [email protected] Levion, Diana Padre Dam MWD [email protected]
Del Bosque, Erick Sweetwater Authority [email protected] rg
Olson, Gabriela Valley Center MWD [email protected]
Prus. Lisa SDCWA [email protected]
Sorce, Lisa Padre Dam MWD [email protected]
Williams, Dennis Valley Center MWD [email protected]
Woolslayer,
Trisha
Vallecitos WD [email protected]
Pedrazzi, Ed Vallecitos WD [email protected]
Newman, Richard Alpine Union School District [email protected] et
Seifts, Rena Ramona School District [email protected]

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-343
MEETING 15. CMP #7 AGENDA: 10/20/2021 @ 10 AM

INTRODUCTION

1. HAZUS DATA

2. FEMA WORK SHEET 5.1

3. COUNTY OF SD HAZMIT TRACKER

4. FEMA LOCAL PLAN REVIEW TOOL

5. PUBLIC FEEDBACK

6. UPDATED DEADLINES

7. QUESTIONS

8. ASSIGNMENT RECAP

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-344

HAZUS DATA
 The LUEG GIS Team created an excel file showing the counts of different types of critical facilities that fall within the boundaries of each jurisdiction:
<<Preliminary_Critical_Facilities_Counts_By_Jurisdiction_10192021.xlsx>>  The LUEG GIS Team also created a web map that shows all the participating jurisdictions and hazards across the county. It includes layers for:
o Wildfire
o Earthquakes
o Floods
o Coastal Erosion
o Tsunamis
o Dam Failures
o Landslides and
o Soil Liquefaction
The web map can be accessed via this link- Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Map:
https://gisportal.sandiegocounty.gov/arcgis/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=44d3eaf08e9d441 3832a685b721f26cc.
 Current top 5 hazards listed in the 2018 HazMit Plan are:

Fire
Hazardous Materials Release
Flood
Earthquake
Manmade Hazards (Human Caused Hazards)
Assignment: Send me your input for top 5 County-wide Hazard rankings before our next County planning meeting (will be scheduled for the beginning of January 2022).

FEMA WORK SHEET 5.1
 Worksheet 5.1 SD County.docx

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-345

COUNTY OF SD HAZMIT TRACKER
 This tool mirrors the Goals, Objectives and Actions listed in Section 5 of the current Plan, and will enable us to efficiently update the Plan as a Team  These goals are needed to get our plan approved by Cal OES and FEMA  Assignment:
o Review the “Objectives” and determine whether your department is responsible for an "Action"
o Then, type your name or the responsible party's name and organization in the "Lead/Support" section. Multiple names/departments can be listed, just please to be sure to associate the person's name with their department. This will make it easy for OES, Cal OES or FEMA to contact someone directly if there is a question or clarification needed during the Plan's approval or revision process. o Last, determine then type whether the "Action" is new to the 2023 plan, existing from the 2018 plan or can be consolidated with another "Objective" or "Action" o Please complete this assignment by our next meeting date in January

FEMA LOCAL PLAN REVIEW TOOL
 Demonstrates how our Hazard Mitigation Plan meets regulations and enables Cal OES and FEMA to provide us with detailed feedback
 This tool also has HazMit Training, Guidance and Resources.  Assignment: Please review this document and get familiar with the elements by our next meeting

PUBLIC FEEDBACK
 New format and scheduled date/time is pending.

UPDATED DEADLINES
 Planning Meeting #4 with jurisdictions is next Tuesday, 10/26 @ 9AM-10 PM.  County Planning Meeting #8 is tentative for early January.  Cal OES HazMit Funding Training tentative for April 11th.  Our goal is to submit the Hazmit plan for Cal OES and FEMA approval by early June 2022.

QUESTIONS
 Any final questions?

ASSIGNMENT RECAP
 Dominique will send an email after this meeting with this agenda, attachments and other documents we discussed so you have all the information and tentative deadlines available.

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-346

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-347
MEETING 16.

Full Name User Action Timestamp
Fonseca, Dominique Joined 10/26/2021, 8:58:20 AM
Ackerman, Shannon (DPLU) Joined before 10/26/2021, 8:58:20 AM Ackerman, Shannon (DPLU) Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:59 AM
Jamie Smith Joined before 10/26/2021, 8:58:20 AM
Jamie Smith Left 10/26/2021, 9:23:06 AM
Katelynn Rise (Guest) Joined before 10/26/2021, 8:58:20 AM Katelynn Rise (Guest) Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Corina Jimenez Joined 10/26/2021, 8:58:23 AM
Corina Jimenez Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Susy Turnbull Joined 10/26/2021, 8:58:50 AM
Susy Turnbull Left 10/26/2021, 9:20:56 AM
Zubel, Nicholas Joined 10/26/2021, 8:59:02 AM
Zubel, Nicholas Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:56 AM
Don Rawson Joined 10/26/2021, 8:59:05 AM
Don Rawson Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:52 AM
Allen, Tiffany Joined 10/26/2021, 8:59:26 AM
Allen, Tiffany Left 10/26/2021, 9:20:57 AM
David Foster Joined 10/26/2021, 8:59:27 AM
David Foster Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:58 AM
Jeff Murdock - Escondido (Guest) Joined 10/26/2021, 8:59:51 AM Jeff Murdock - Escondido (Guest) Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM Castellanos, Marielena Joined 10/26/2021, 8:59:57 AM
Castellanos, Marielena Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Clement Brown Joined 10/26/2021, 9:00:33 AM
Clement Brown Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:52 AM
Pender, David Joined 10/26/2021, 9:00:57 AM
Andolina, Robert Joined 10/26/2021, 9:01:04 AM
Andolina, Robert Left 10/26/2021, 9:04:49 AM
Andolina, Robert Joined 10/26/2021, 9:21:43 AM
Andolina, Robert Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Walter Amedee (National City)
(Guest)
Joined 10/26/2021, 9:01:09 AM
Walter Amedee (National City)
(Guest)
Left 10/26/2021, 9:23:04 AM
Russ Cunningham (Guest) Joined 10/26/2021, 9:01:15 AM
Andy McKellar (Guest) Joined 10/26/2021, 9:02:11 AM
Andy McKellar (Guest) Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Anna Lowe Joined 10/26/2021, 9:02:17 AM
Anna Lowe Left 10/26/2021, 9:20:20 AM
Cid Tesoro Joined 10/26/2021, 9:02:45 AM

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-348
Full Name User Action Timestamp
Cid Tesoro Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Dawes, Ian Joined 10/26/2021, 9:02:47 AM
Dawes, Ian Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Robles, Michael Joined 10/26/2021, 9:02:48 AM
Robles, Michael Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:59 AM
Batchelor, Jason Joined 10/26/2021, 9:02:52 AM
Batchelor, Jason Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Ponce, Cruz@Caloes Joined 10/26/2021, 9:02:52 AM
Ponce, Cruz@Caloes Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Prus, Lisa Joined 10/26/2021, 9:03:35 AM
Prus, Lisa Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:56 AM
+1 714-330-1026 Joined 10/26/2021, 9:03:56 AM
+1 714-330-1026 Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:56 AM
Thomlison, Nicholas Joined 10/26/2021, 9:04:40 AM
Thomlison, Nicholas Left 10/26/2021, 9:20:57 AM
Rimga Viskanta Joined 10/26/2021, 9:06:07 AM
Rimga Viskanta Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:51 AM
Larry Costello Joined 10/26/2021, 9:06:33 AM
Larry Costello Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Lois Yum Joined 10/26/2021, 9:07:46 AM
Lois Yum Left 10/26/2021, 9:22:55 AM
Marie Jones-Kirk Joined 10/26/2021, 9:13:54 AM
Marie Jones-Kirk Left 10/26/2021, 9:21:05 AM

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-349
MEETING 19. SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING MEETING #8
January 19, 2022 • 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM
AGENDA

1. Welcome and Introductions

2. Survey Details
a. Current Translation Status
b. Timeline and Document Location

3. Assignments
a. SD County OES Worksheet 6.1/6.2 Guidance
b. Deadlines and Worksheet Submission

4. Funding Opportunities
a. NOI Deadlines
b. BRIC Technical Assistance Application

5. Action Items, Follow-Up Meetings, and Schedule
a. HAZMIT Planning Team Meeting Timeline
b. County OES Actions/Deadlines

6. Round Table/Questions

7. Adjourn

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-350
MEETING 20. SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING MEETING #8
February 1, 2022 • 3:00 PM – 4:00 PM
AGENDA

1. Welcome

2. Public Feedback Survey/Advertisement Update

3. Assignments
a. FEMA Worksheet 6.1/6.2 Wrap-up
b. Start Task 7: FEMA Work Sheets 7.1/7.2

4. Funding and Training Opportunities
a. NOI Deadline
b. BRIC Technical Assistance Application
c. PrepCA State Initiative
d. Cal OES Sub-Application Development Series: Advanced Assistance Webinar Dates

5. Action Items, Follow-Up Meetings, and Schedule
a. Deadlines
b. Next Meeting Release

6. Round Table/Questions

7. Adjourn

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-351
MEETING 21. SAN DIEGO COUNTY PLANNING MEETING #9
February 11, 2022 • 10:00 AM – 11:00 AM
AGENDA

1. Welcome

2. Public Feedback Survey/Advertisement Update

3. Assignments
a. FEMA Worksheet 6.1/6.2 Wrap-up
b. Start Task 7: FEMA Work Sheets 7.1/7.2

4. Funding and Training Opportunities
a. NOI Deadline
b. BRIC Technical Assistance Application
c. PrepCA State Initiative
d. Cal OES Sub-Application Development Series: Advanced Assistance Webinar Dates

5. Action Items, Follow-Up Meetings, and Schedule
a. Deadlines
b. Next Meeting Release

6. Round Table/Questions

7. Adjourn
MEETING 23. SAN DIEGO OA PLANNING MEETING #6
March 7, 2022 • 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM
AGENDA

8. Welcome

9. Public Feedback Survey Results

10. Assignments
a. FEMA Work Sheets 7.1/7.2 Wrap-up/Final Questions
b. Start final FEMA Work Sheet (8.1)
c. Finalize Updated Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Draft and all Annex edits

ATTACHMENT
A
SECTION SEVEN | Keep the Plan Current A-352

11. Funding and Training Opportunities
a. PrepCA State Initiative
b. Cal OES Sub-Application Development Series: Advanced Assistance Webinars

12. Action Items, Follow-Up Meetings, and Schedule
c. Deadlines
d. Next Meeting
e. Next Steps

13. Round Table/Questions

14. Adjourn

ADDITIONAL PROOF OF ALL PARTICIPANT PARTICIPATION IN THE PLANNING PROCESS WAS COMPILED AND PROVIDED TO CAL OES AND FEMA. THIS PROOF

HAS SENSITIVE CONTACT INFORMATION AND INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO,

PROOF OF VIRTUAL AND/OR IN-PERSON ONE-ON-ONE

CALLS/MEETINGS/APPOINTMENTS, PARTICIPATION IN QUESTION & ANSWER SESSIONS, AND EMAILS.