Scotts Valley City Council
May 6, 2026

AGENDA
Meeting of the
Scotts Valley City Council
In-Person and Remote Access
Date: May 6, 2026
Time: 6:00 PM

CONTACT

INFORMATION

MEETING LOCATION POSTING
City of Scotts Valley
1 Civic Center Drive
Scotts Valley, CA 95066
(831) 440-5600
City Council Chambers
1 Civic Center Drive
Scotts Valley, CA 95066
OR
Zoom Video Conference
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83295730901
Agenda posted on 5-1-
2026 at City Hall, SV
Senior Center, SV Public
Works Building, and on the
Internet
at: www.scottsvalley.gov

ELECTED OFFICIALS CITY STAFF MEMBERS
Donna Lind, Mayor
Steve Clark, Vice Mayor
Krista Jett, Council Member
Derek Timm, Council Member
Greg Wimp, Council Member
Mali LaGoe, City Manager
Kirsten Powell, City Attorney
Cathie Simonovich, City Clerk

MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA PACKET MATERIALS
Notice regarding City Council Meetings:

The City Council meets regularly on the 1st and 3rd Wednesday of each month at 6:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1 Civic Center Drive, Scotts Valley, CA 95066, and via Zoom Webinar remote access.

Agenda and Agenda Packet Materials:

The City Council agenda and the complete agenda packet are available for review by 5:00 PM the Friday before the Wednesday meeting on the Internet at the City’s website:
www.scottsvalley.gov and in the lobby of City Hall at 1 Civic Center Drive, Scotts Valley, CA.

Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5, materials related to an agenda item, submitted after distribution of the agenda packet, are available for public inspection in the lobby of City Hall during normal business hours, Monday-Friday, 8am-12 pm and 1-5 pm. In accordance with AB 1344, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at www.scottsvalley.gov.

Public Participation:

The meeting will be available on Zoom and livestreamed to the City of Scotts Valley’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@cityofscottsvalley
For those wishing to participate via Zoom you can join the following ways:

Zoom Webinar meeting link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83295730901 Or dial one of these numbers: (669) 900-9128 or (669) 444-9171 Webinar ID: 832 9573 0901

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 2
Date: May 6, 2026
Whether attendance is in-person or remote, you will be given opportunities to provide public comment at the appropriate times throughout the meeting. The time limit is up to 3 minutes for an individual, or 5 minutes for someone who is representing a group of three or more, at the discretion of the Mayor. Please note that this is not a question-and-answer time, but simply a time to provide comments to the Council. At the appropriate times during the meeting for public comment, on items not on the agenda, and on specific agenda items, the Mayor will announce that public comment will be accepted.

How to comment via in-person attendance:

Please proceed to the public comment podium when the Mayor opens the item for public comment.

How to comment via Zoom Webinar:

Use the webinar attendee option to “raise hand” when the Mayor opens the item for public comment. The Clerk will unmute you when it is your turn. If you have joined via Zoom phone call, dial *9 or your phone to “raise your hand”, and the Clerk will unmute you when it is your turn.

CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE and MOMENT OF SILENCE

ROLL CALL

SPECIAL SET MATTER

1. Mayor's Proclamation for Peace Officers' Memorial Day, May 15, 2026

2. Mayor's Proclamation for Older Americans Month, May 2026

COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council members are appointed to committees which are either City committees or committees dealing with other jurisdictions. This portion of the agenda allows the committee member to present oral or written reports to the Council regarding their committee assignments. It also allows the Council to make comments and give the committee member direction, as required.

CITY MANAGER REPORT

PUBLIC COMMENT TIME
This is the opportunity for individuals attending in person to make oral comments to the Council on any items within the purview of the Council, which are NOT part of the Agenda. No action on the item may be taken, but the Council may request the matter be placed on a future

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 3
Date: May 6, 2026
agenda. Written public comment may be emailed to the City Clerk by 5:00 PM on the day of the meeting at [email protected].

ALTERATIONS TO CONSENT AGENDA
Council can remove or add items to the Consent Agenda.

CONSENT AGENDA
The Consent Agenda is comprised of items which are intended to be non-controversial and are approved without discussion. Persons wishing to speak on any item may request the item be moved to the Regular Agenda by raising their hand to be recognized by the Mayor. An item will only be moved from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda if a City Council Member requests it to be moved and a majority of the Council agrees.

1. Approve City Council minutes of 04-15-2026

2. Contract Award for Development of Skypark Master Plan in Amount of $171,006

3. Ratify appointment of Scotts Valley Senior Center Advisory Commission Member

4. Approval of Wastewater Recycling Facility Membrane Bioreactor Preliminary Design (Phase 2) Agreement in amount of $628,406.90

5. Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2026

6. Monthly Treasurer's Report - February 2026

7. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 15.14 an amendment to the Business License Tax Ordinance to establish economic development event exemption and associated administrative fee

8. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 22-200.4 approving LexiPol Policy 706 pertaining to the funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment as mandated by Assembly Bill 481

9. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 202 designating no stopping, no parking areas

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. Public Hearing to consider the adoption of Fire Facility Impact Fees to be collected by the City on behalf of the Scotts Valley Fire Protection District

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 4
Date: May 6, 2026

2. Public Hearing to consider Resolution 1198.81 adopting proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 User Fee Schedule and Charges

3. Public Hearing for presentation of Vacancy Status and Recruitment Strategies per AB 2561

ALTERATIONS TO REGULAR AGENDA
Council can remove or add items to the Regular Agenda.

REGULAR AGENDA
Persons wishing to speak on any item may do so by raising their hand to be recognized by the Mayor.

1. Adoption of the Santa Cruz County Safety Action Plan

2. Santa Cruz METRO Transit District Presentation

3. Future Council Agenda Items

ADJOURNMENT

ADA NOTICE
The City of Scotts Valley does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. The City Council Chambers is an accessible facility. If you wish to attend a City Council meeting and require assistance such as sign language, a translator, or other special assistance or devices in order to attend and participate at the meeting, please call the City Clerk's office at (831) 440-5608 five to seven days in advance of the meeting to make arrangements for assistance. If you require the agenda of a City Council meeting be available in an alternative format consistent with a specific disability, please call the City Clerk’s Office. The California State Relay Service (TTY/VCO/HCO to Voice: English 1-800-735-2929, Spanish 1-800-855-3000; or, Voice to TTY/VCO/HCO: English 1-800-735-2922, Spanish 1-800-855-3000), provides Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf and Disabled and will provide a link between the TDD caller and users of telephone equipment.

City Council Meeting Agenda Page 5
Date: May 6, 2026

PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC

THE FOLLOWING IS THE PROCEDURE COUNCIL SHOULD TAKE IN
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION:

1. Move the Resolution number for approval.

2. Second the motion.

3. Vote by body, a roll call vote is not required.

THE FOLLOWING IS THE PROCEDURE COUNCIL SHOULD TAKE IN
INTRODUCTION/ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE:

1. Move the Ordinance number for introduction (or adoption).

2. Move the Ordinance be introduced by title only and waive the reading of the text.

3. Read the Ordinance title.

4. Second the motion.

5. Vote by body, a roll call vote is not required.

THE FOLLOWING IS THE PROCEDURE COUNCIL SHOULD TAKE IN
PUBLIC COMMENT/PUBLIC HEARINGS:

Unless otherwise determined by the presiding officer of the meeting:

1. Three minutes allowed per individual to speak.

2. Five minutes allowed per individual representing a group of three or more. ❖❖❖❖❖❖❖❖
The City of Scotts Valley does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. The City Council Chambers is an accessible facility. If you wish to attend a City Council meeting and require assistance such as sign language, a translator, or other special assistance or devices in order to attend and participate at the meeting, please call the City Clerk's office at (831) 440-5608 five to seven days in advance of the meeting to make arrangements for assistance. If you require the agenda of a City Council meeting be available in an alternative format consistent with a specific disability, please call the City Clerk’s Office. The California State Relay Service (TTY/VCO/HCO to Voice: English 1-800-735-2929, Spanish 1-800-855-3000; Voice to TTY/VCO/HCO: English 1- 800-735-2922, Spanish 1-800-855-3000; or, from or to Speech-to-Speech, English & Spanish 1- 800-854-7787), provides Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf and Disabled and will provide a link between the TDD caller and users of telephone equipment.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE and MOMENT OF SILENCE

ROLL CALL
CITY STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:

Kirsten Powell, City Attorney
Stephanie Hill, Administrative Services Director
Rodolfo Onchi, Public Works Director
Jayson Rutherford, Police Chief
Scott Garner, Police Captain
Cathie Simonovich, City Clerk

ELECTED OFFICIALS
PRESENT:

Donna Lind, Mayor
Steve Clark, Vice Mayor
Krista Jett, Council Member
Derek Timm, Council Member
Greg Wimp, Council Member

SPECIAL SET MATTER

MINUTES
Meeting of the
Scotts Valley City Council
Date: April 15, 2026
Time: 6:00 PM

CONTACT

INFORMATION

MEETING LOCATION POSTING
City of Scotts Valley City Council Chambers The agenda was posted 1 Civic Center Drive 1 Civic Center Drive on 4-9-2026 at City Hall, Scotts Valley, CA Scotts Valley, CA 95066 SV Senior Center, SV 95066 OR Public Works Building,
(831) 440-5600 Zoom Video Conference and on the Internet https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83295730901 at www.scottsvalley.gov.

CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
The City Council meeting was called to order at 6:02 PM.

1. Mayor's Proclamation for Water Safety and Drowning Prevention Month - May 2026
Mayor Lind presented the proclamation recognizing May 2026 as Water Safety and Drowning Prevention Month. Jeff Griffith-Jones, Owner and CEO of Pacific Flow Swim School, accepted the proclamation and highlighted the events and activities that will occur in the month of May to support this important cause.

City Council Meeting Minutes
Date: April 15, 2026

COMMITTEE REPORTS

CITY MANAGER REPORT

2. Mayor's Proclamation for Child Abuse Prevention Month - April 2026 Mayor Lind recognized April 2026 as Child Abuse Prevention Month.

3. Mayor's Proclamation for National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week - April 12-18, 2026
Mayor Lind presented the proclamation recognizing the week of April 12th through April 18th as National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week. Chloe Graham, Police Department Services Supervisor, accepted the proclamation.

CM Timm, along with CM Wimp and City Staff, attended the Economic Development Committee meeting where they discussed ways to assist businesses who will be displaced from 75 Mount Hermon Road due to the new affordable housing project.

They also discussed a business incentive program designed to help businesses along Scotts Valley Drive beautify their frontage areas.

CM Timm and VM Clark attended the Board of Supervisors meeting regarding the Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) agenda item. The County voted unanimously to participate in the City's EIFD, which also includes the Scotts Valley Fire Protection District.

CM Jett, as part of her Youth Action Network (YAN) responsibilities, had a meeting with the Pathways to Possibility group at Scotts Valley High School to prepare for the agenda item that Council will hear later this evening.

VM Clark attended a Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) meeting and announced that the parking area for Panther Beach on Highway 1 now open. This area is adjacent to the future North Coast Rail Trail, and the parking area includes restrooms, a plaza area, and bike racks. He also noted that the next phase of this project is to partner with the Federal Highway Administration to complete a pedestrian bridge over Highway 1 to connect with the Cotoni Coast Dairies trail entrance area.

Finally, he noted that work continues on the Highway 1 Bus on Shoulder project and the next phase, starting this Sunday, involves a 6-month closure of the on ramp from Park Avenue to southbound Highway 1.

VM Clark attended a meeting of the Area Agency on Aging (AAA) where they reviewed and approved updates to the Area Plan for Aging, which is part of the Master Plan for Aging. They are still waiting to hear how the California Plan for Aging will affect the County's local plan. VM Clark highlighted Project Scout for the excellent work they are doing for AAA by assisting Seniors with their income tax filings.

VM Clark announced that the Volunteer Center's annual Be the Difference awards event will be May 20th at 11:30 AM at The Grove Events Center.

City Council Meeting Minutes
Date: April 15, 2026

PUBLIC COMMENT TIME

ALTERATIONS TO CONSENT AGENDA

CONSENT AGENDA

ALTERATIONS TO REGULAR AGENDA

REGULAR AGENDA
Administrative Services Supervisor Hill, reporting for City Manager LaGoe, announced that the City is officially fully staffed.

Mayor Lind announced that April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month, and she highlighted several events, including Denim Day on April 29.

Mayor Lind announced that she and CM Wimp attended the groundbreaking ceremony for the new stadium at Scotts Valley High School.

Mayor Lind announced that the "Spring Fling Burger Night at the Moose" will be on Sunday, April 19th at 4:30 PM at the Moose Lodge. This event supports Damians Ladder, a local non-profit organization dedicated to assisting senior citizens and individuals with disabilities with small home repairs.

M/S: Clark/Timm
To approve the Consent Agenda with no alterations.

Carried 5/0 (AYES: Lind, Clark, Jett, Timm, Wimp)

1. Approve City Council minutes of 04-01-2026

2. Consider request to display the Pride flag to commemorate Pride Month from June 1st to June 30th, 2026

3. Consider letter of support for AB 1902 (Pellerin) - Procedures for continued detention in secure youth treatment facilities

4. Resolution Creating No Parking Areas along Civic Center Drive M/S: Timm/Clark
To approve the Regular Agenda with no alterations.

Carried 5/0 (AYES: Lind, Clark, Jett, Timm, Wimp)

1. Pathways to Possibility Youth City Liaison Program presentation Sookie Ramos from the United Way presented the Pathways to Possibility (P2P) Youth City Liaison Program. Emil Schultz, Youth President of P2P, gave a testimonial for the

City Council Meeting Minutes
Date: April 15, 2026

program and his vision for the future.

M/S: Jett/Timm
To approve Scotts Valley's participation in the United Way Youth City Liaison Program and authorize the allocation of $1,300 in the FY26/27 budget to support two student participants.

Carried 5/0 (AYES: Lind, Clark, Jett, Timm, Wimp)

2. Ordinance Establishing No Parking Areas in the City
City Attorney Powell presented this item.

M/S: Clark/Timm
To introduce Ordinance No. 202, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Scotts Valley Amending Title 10, Chapter 10.08 By Adding Section 10.08.035 Designating No Stopping, No Parking Areas and waive the reading thereof.

Carried 5/0 (AYES: Lind, Clark, Jett, Timm, Wimp)

3. Presentation of the 2025 Scotts Valley Police Annual Activity Report Chief Rutherford presented this item and responded to questions from the Council.

4. AB 481 Military Equipment Use Annual Report and Ordinance Renewing the Military Use Policy
Captain Garner presented this item.

M/S: Clark/Jett
To review and renew Ordinance No. 22-200.4 by introducing and waiving further reading of Ordinance No. 22.200.4 approving Lexipol Policy 706 pertaining to the funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment as mandated by Assembly Bill 481, and to approve the acquisition of the three new Colt rifles as listed in the Annual Report.

Carried 5/0 (AYES: Lind, Clark, Jett, Timm, Wimp)

5. Amendment to Business License Tax Ordinance to Establish Economic Development Event Exemption and Associated Administrative Fee Administrative Services Director Hill presented this item and responded to questions from the Council.

M/S: Timm/Clark
To introduce and waive the reading of Ordinance No. 202 amending Chapter

5.01.080 of the Municipal Code to establish a Business License Tax exemption for designated Economic Development Special Events.

Carried 5/0 (AYES: Lind, Clark, Jett, Timm, Wimp)

City Council Meeting Minutes
Date: April 15, 2026

M/S: Timm/Clark
To designate the City Manager as the approving authority for qualifying events, and to make implementation contingent upon adoption of the related user fee.

Carried 5/0 (AYES: Lind, Clark, Jett, Timm, Wimp)

6. Future Council Agenda Items
None.

The meeting adjourned at 7:04 PM.

Attest:

Cathie Simonovich, City Clerk
Approved:

Donna Lind, Mayor

ADJOURNMENT

AGENDA ITEM 2.

DATE: 5/6/2026
City of Scotts Valley

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: 5/6/2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Rodolfo Onchi, Public Works Director
APPROVED: Mali LaGoe, City Manager
SUBJECT: Contract Award for Development of Skypark Master Plan in Amount of $171,006

SUMMARY OF ISSUE
On October 31, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposals from qualified consultants to develop a park-specific master plan for Skypark, the City’s 22.5-acre community park located adjacent to the site of the future Scotts Valley Town Center.

Skypark was developed in 1996 as part of the Skypark neighborhood development. Prior to its development, the site- along with the Town Center site and Skypark neighborhoodencompassed a regional airport that closed in 1982. The Skypark neighborhood and recent commercial development have embraced the airport theme in building design (the Hangar), street names and public art.

As the largest park in Scotts Valley, amenities include: a skatepark, large multipurpose fields, 2 bocce courts, 2 half-court basketball courts, playgrounds for ages 2-6 and 6-12, 2 tennis courts, 4 pickleball courts plus 1 shared pickleball/tennis court, a 1-mile linear walking/jogging/cycling trail with calisthenics equipment, 2 gazebos available for rental and 2 first-come/first-serve gazebos, picnic tables with BBQs, and a bathroom facility.

As the City has grown and more families are moving to Scotts Valley, pressure on our existing parks is mounting. In 2024, the City adopted a citywide Parks Master Plan, which identified the need for additional amenities and recreational opportunities for Scotts Valley's growing community. Recognizing that the City doesn't have extra land available to build new parks, the plan recommended developing dedicated master plans for each park in order to maximize the park space the City has, and be able to accommodate increasing needs of a growing community. The City identified Skypark as the first and most critical park to develop a parkspecific master plan to guide future improvements to maximize the space available and ensure alignment with the Town Center Specific Plan. The citywide plan emphasized the importance of connectivity, flexible event space, and upgraded amenities to meet the needs of a growing and diverse community.

To reflect and expand upon those goals, the Skypark Master Plan will be developed in coordination with the Town Center planning process to ensure seamless physical and visual integration along the shared edge. This includes collaboration on shared access points,

landscape continuity, amenities, and community use.

The deadline for submissions ended on January 9, 2026, with a total of seven (7) proposals received. Upon carefully reviewing the consultant firm’s submittals, City staff is recommending RRM Design Group as the awardee of the development of the Skypark Master Plan based on their expertise in landscape architecture, park planning, and community engagement.

Upon City Council approval of the Skypark Master Plan Contract, the City will execute a standard consultant agreement with RRM Design Group.

FISCAL IMPACT
The contract award for the Skypark Master Plan is $155,460. Staff recommends the inclusion of a 10% contingency in the amount of $15,546, bringing the total contract amount to $171,006. Funding for this contract will be drawn from the City's Parks Development Impact Fee fund, Parkland Fees and the General Fund.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution No. 2086 authorizing the contract award to develop the Skypark Master Plan to RRM Design Group and authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. RRM-Design-Group_Skypark-Master-Plan_01-09-2026

2. Resolution No. 2086_Contract Award for Skypark Master Plan

Skypark Master Plan
Proposal prepared for the City of Scotts Valley
by RRM Design Group on January 9, 2026

Re: Skypark Master Plan
Dear Ms. Pfefferkorn,
By the end of our site visit to Skypark on Veterans Day in November, following the release of the RFP, we knew we wanted to collaborate with your team to plan for the future of this well-loved community park. RRM Design Group has a team of landscape architects who help communities throughout California re-imagine and enhance a park’s character and usefulness for multi-generational users.

RRM is a strong fit for Skypark Master Plan
• We have many examples of parks at this scale and with amenities similar to those described in the RFP.
• We have a reliable reputation with Bay Area public agencies who have hired RRM for multiple park renovation projects. We are committed to representing your interests and helping you achieve your objectives. • Our team is easy-going and collaborative. You can trust us to effectively work with your community.

Understanding of the project's importance to the City
• RRM previously worked on the Town Center Specific Plan project, giving us an appreciation for the long-term commitment to improving the heart of the community.
• We have reviewed the 2024 City Park Master Plan and the results of the community survey, and we understand the significance of the community's priorities for Skypark. We can leverage this knowledge during the public outreach effort.
• We recognize that funding remains uncertain. With our experience in construction and operations, and knowing this is a well-used park, we can help you get the most from the design and then support you in communicating a clear and practical phasing strategy to the community.

Confirmation of RRM’s ability to meet the scope, timeline, and coordination needs of the City
• Absolutely. Our team has decades
of park master planning experience
that is directly relevant to the
Skypark project. We have provided
examples and can meet your
schedule parameters.
• We bring significant developer
experience through our private
sector architects and urban
designers.
• Our team excels at communicating
with the public, understanding their
input, and translating that input into effective design direction. • Our senior-level staff are strong collaborators and advisors to City teams. We help navigate strategy, identify potential obstacles early, and work with you to move around them.

January 9, 2026
Allison Pfefferkorn
Recreation Division
Manager
City of Scotts Valley
1 Civic Center Drive
Scotts Valley, CA 95066
RRM Design Group
325 Davis Street
San Leandro, CA 94577
p: (510) 751-4910
www.rrmdesign.com
Authorized Representative:

Gina Chavez, Principal
p: (510) 751-4911
e: [email protected]
“RRM has produced
quality design and
construction bid packages, and
the RRM team has always been
kind, collaborative, and responsive
from design all the way through
construction."
- Wendy Wellbrock, Associate
Civil Engineer, City of Berkeley

Scope of Work and Budget
This proposal includes a scope of work and fee that aligns closely with the RFP outline. We find your outline thorough and well-structured. Based on our experience designing and implementing parks, we are also open to a more streamlined approach should the City choose—relying on the 2024 Master Plan effort and achieving a complete park design with fewer tasks. This alternative scope is achievable within the $80k budget noted in the response to comments.

We hope to have the opportunity to meet with you and discuss Skypark in greater detail. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to reach out to Gina.

Sincerely,
RRM Design Group
Gina Chavez, PLA Jeff Ferber, ASLA, PLA
Principal-in-Charge & Project Manager Managing Partner

Graphics & Photographs:

This document features images of RRM Design Group and its subconsultant partners' projects, the graphics and photos of which are owned, copyrighted, and/or licensed by our respective firms. Some images may be modified due to privacy concerns.

About RRM Design Group:
325 Davis St. • San Leandro, CA 94577 • (510) 751-4910 • rrmdesign.com • A California corporation • Leonard Grant, Architect C26973 • Robert Camacho, PE 76597 • Steven Webster, LS 7561 • Jeff Ferber, PLA 2844 The written and graphic materials contained in this proposal are the exclusive property of RRM Design Group. The unauthorized use of any portion of these text or graphic materials without RRM’s prior written consent is expressly prohibited. ©2026 RRM Design Group Proposal For Skypark Master Plan
Table of Contents
Firm Qualifications and Experience .................................1 Project Approach/Written Proposal ............................. 25 Project Team's Resumes............................................. 35 Work Samples........................................................... 47 References................................................................51 Proposed Fees ......................................................... 53 Proposed Project Schedule ........................................ 57

1 1
Section One:

Firm Qualifications and Experience
Proposal for
Skypark Master Plan
Rendering:

Dwight Murphy Park
Santa Barbara, CA

2 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan We love being a 100% employee-owned design firm,
and we plan on doing this for the next 50 years
All of us at RRM thrive on our passion for crafting enjoyable environments, a commitment that has fueled our success for fifty years. From the inception of our journey to our current state of expansion, our team of architects, landscape architects, engineers, surveyors, and planners collaborates closely with clients to shape our communities. Whether the project is public or private, commercial or residential, we excel in attentive listening, thoughtful design, and timely, budget-conscious delivery—values we’ve upheld since our establishment in 1974.

We want to be known as friendly, helpful, and
collaborative design professionals
We’re doing
an incredible
amount of work:
2,300+
RRM projects in
the last decade
35 Years of park
planning
experience
270+
Park projects
Our clients enjoy
the experience of
working with us:

8.5 NPS
(Overall Net
Promoter Score) well
above AEC industry
average of 7.2
*89%
of our clients would
recommend RRM
Our employees like their
careers at RRM:
“Best Firm
to Work for”
2022, 2023, 2024, 2025
- Zweig Group
10-15
Years average
longevity of
an RRM employee
20 Years average
longevity of
an RRM principal
7 RRM Offices
Our primary office location for this
project is located here:
325 Davis Street
San Leandro, CA 94577
p: (510) 751-4910
All offices: San Luis Obispo, Santa
Barbara, San Juan Capistrano, San
Leandro, Ventura, San Diego, and
Seattle
200+ Employees
in 6 Disciplines
• Architects
• Civil Engineers
• Landscape Architects
• Planners & Urban Designers
• Structural Engineers
• Surveyors
100% EmployeeOwned Firm
RRM Design Group is a California
corporation and a 100%
employee-owned company (ESOP),
incorporated November 26, 1974
RRM Design Group Firm Profile
50 Years of Creating Environments People Enjoy
RRM by the Numbers
* Per RRM survey sent out to clients every year

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 3
Gina Chavez
PLA, BFQ Professional
Principal-in-Charge +
Project Manager
Principal
Jeff Ferber

ASLA, PLA
Development Liaison/
Strategic Advisor
Managing Partner
RRM Design Group
Our Team for Scotts Valley
Choosing RRM means partnering with a multidisciplinary team experienced in delivering implementable park and open space master plans that balance community vision, technical feasibility, and long-term operations.

Our team brings deep expertise in landscape architecture, park planning, community engagement, and interdisciplinary coordination, with a collaborative approach tailored to the City’s goals for Skypark. We emphasize thoughtful integration with surrounding development, inclusive public outreach, and clear, phased recommendations that support future funding, implementation, and maintenance. RRM’s team structure ensures clear leadership, efficient coordination, and responsive communication throughout the planning process.

All proposed team members are properly licensed and qualified to perform their assigned roles. Relevant certifications, professional licenses, and affiliations for key personnel are included in the resumes provided in Section 3.

Subconsultants
Wormhoudt Inc.

Pump Track Design
Zachary Wormhoudt
David J. Powers & Associates
Environmental Consultant
Akoni Danielsen
Lance Wierschem

PLA, LEED AP
Master Plan Document Lead
Manager of Landscape
Architecture
Amanda Seibel

PLA, LEED AP
Park Design
Design Director
Scott Yoshida

PE, QSD/P
Civil Engineer
Manager of Civil Engineering
Brian Hellwig
Surveyor
Supervisor of Surveying
Tom Hare
Operations and
Maintenance Expert
Manager of Civil Engineering

4 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan San Lorenzo Community Park
Something for everyone
In partnership with the Hayward Area Recreation District, RRM has been working on a renovation for San Lorenzo Park over the past decade, which involves three phases of construction. Through extensive community outreach and design, the park now features new natural and synthetic sports fields, a basketball court, two playgrounds, a dog park, walking loops, and a soon to be renovated community center. It also includes a new one-acre pond, designed as its own ecosystem which benefits both wildlife and people.

It features diverse flora and fauna, a boardwalk with viewing platforms, and a stormwater filtration system that irrigates the sports fields. Exciting play features, such as a zipline, embankment slide, and an eight-foot-tall climbing rock shaped like a mama bear and her cub, continue to draw visitors. From the top of the rock, you can enjoy stunning views of the adjacent bay and the sprawling 32-acres park.

Client
City of San Lorenzo
Location
San Lorenzo, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Structural Engineering
• Surveying
Key Features & Elements
• Sports facilities
• Community amenities
• Environmental enhancements
• Phased development
Project Size
31 Acres
Project Timeline
2012-Present
Merit Award, 2018
- ASLA Southern California

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 5
Thanks are expressed
to [RRM for giving] us a
beautiful, functional and
happy park in San Lorenzo. It has
made San Lorenzo as a community and
provided new inspiration for further
support in other parks."
- Betty L. Moose, Chairperson,
San Lorenzo Neighborhood Community
Forum

6 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Tennyson Park
A community hub in South Hayward
In the heart of Hayward, a vibrant new park is taking shape, designed to serve the diverse needs of the community. RRM Design Group crafted an exciting 10-acre master plan through six dynamic public engagement opportunities, including specialized workshops and creative outreach strategies. Highlights included a pop-up workshop at a community food pantry and the “Reach for a Better Community” design charrette, which generated over 25 innovative concepts. The first phase, already completed, is the stunning inclusive playground “Mia’s Dream Come True.” The second phase, currently under construction, includes a new picnic area with a shade structure, a flexible-use lawn, a pump track, skate park upgrades, a full-size natural grass multi-sport field, a full basketball court, and “Bankshot Basketball,” a fully inclusive game.

Additional improvements feature a maintenance building and a permeable concrete parking lot. The opening of this new park is paving the way for a space that truly reflects the community’s vision and needs.

Client
Hayward Area Recreation & Park
District (HARD)
Location
Hayward, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Structural Engineering
Key Features & Elements
• Extensive public engagement
• Innovative outreach events
• Community-driven design
• Inclusive and vibrant vision
Project Size
10 Acres
Project Timeline
2019-Present

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 7

8 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Dwight Murphy Field
A vibrant space for all to enjoy
Nestled next to the Santa Barbara Zoo, Dwight Murphy Park is a beloved city landmark undergoing an exciting transformation. RRM has crafted a vibrant, comprehensive master plan to enhance the park’s functionality and introduce new attractions. The project began with an extensive community outreach effort, engaging over 800 participants whose ideas helped shape Dwight Murphy Park’s future.

A standout addition is an all-abilities regional playground, created in partnership with a private foundation, ensuring inclusivity for all visitors.

The park’s 14-acre site will also feature a network of accessible pathways, seamlessly connecting these new amenities.

Dwight Murphy Park is set to become a hub of activity and joy, offering something for everyone in the community.

Client
City of Santa Barbara
Location
Santa Barbara, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Architecture
• Surveying
Key Features & Elements
• Sports fields
• Inclusive playground
• Picnic area
• Fitness equipment
Project Size
14 Acres
Project Timeline
2018-Present

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 9
Downey Measure S Park Improvement
Projects
RRM was selected by the City of Downey to prepare park improvement plans for three neighborhood parks: Discovery Park, Furman Park, and Independence Park. RRM’s team successfully generated all three park plans from schematic design to construction drawings within the six-month timeline stressed by the City. The various park designs carefully considered the existing uses of the parks by the surrounding community resulting in the preservation of the original atmosphere and overall functionality of each park. At Furman Park, with the replacement and upsize of four new picnic shelters equipped with electrical connections, more picnic tables and barbecues, and a new restroom building, events of various sizes can now be held at the park. Recreational facilities were improved by adding a multisport court, resurfaced sports courts, upgraded backstops and fencing, and improved fitness circuit. The addition of a synthetic turf soccer field is the highlight at Discovery Park, providing the community the ability to play harder on a new durable surface and play later under the upgraded Musco Sports Lighting.

Client
City of Downey
Location
Downey, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Surveying
Project Timeline
2018-2020
AWPA BEST Award
- (Building Excellence Shaping Tomorrow)
APWA Southern California Chapter

10 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Grove Park Field and Playground
Renovation
Transforming Grove Park: Baseball Field & Playgrounds
RRM facilitated and provided materials for public outreach meetings and RRM is currently providing design, estimating and construction documentation services for the renovation of Grove Park baseball field and Playgrounds.

RRM will produce permitting and bid documents and perform construction administration during the construction phase. Field renovation scope includes new field turf, infield, irrigation, dugouts, retaining walls, lighting controls, fencing, ball netting and backstop. The playground scope includes new surfacing and new playground equipment for children ages 2-5 and 5-12.

Other site improvements include: ADA access, seat walls, picnic area and site furnishings, pavement work and improved grading and drainage.

Client
City of Berkeley
Location
Berkeley, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Architecture
• Surveying
Project Size

1.9 Acres
Project Timeline
2021-2024

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 11
San Pablo Park
Playgrounds & Sports Court Revamp
San Pablo Park in Berkeley has been beautifully transformed through RRM Design Group’s innovative design and construction administration services.

The renovation features enhanced playgrounds for children ages 2-5 and 5-12, a revitalized tennis court, and significant ADA improvements, along with new seat walls, shade structures, bleachers, and site furnishings.

Collaborating closely with the City of Berkeley, RRM facilitated public outreach, produced construction documents, and managed permitting.

A unique collaboration with a public artist resulted in bench seats and art pieces inspired by native plant species, adding a special touch to the park.

Completed at the end of 2020, this renovation has redefined San Pablo Park as a vibrant community space.

The park also includes soccer fields, softball fields, basketball courts, a dog park, and a new community center renovation. Park goers were initially skeptical of any changes but now love their “new” 30-acre park! Client
City of Berkeley
Location
Berkeley, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Structural Engineering
• Surveying
Project Size
30 Acres
Project Timeline
2018-2021

12 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Kennedy Park
A flagship park for the community
The Hayward Area Recreation and Park District embarked on a major renovation of their cherished park, aiming to enhance its functionality for all visitors while generating new revenue streams. RRM’s landscape architecture team guided the project from concept to construction, resulting in a vibrant space that embraces the park’s historic charm. Highlights of the new design include a new snack shack, a festival lawn/ community green, two new amusement rides, a rentable party pavilion, and enhanced picnic areas. This destination park continues to offer beloved attractions like the train ride, carousel, petting zoo, and the historic McConaghy House, ensuring a truly enriching experience for the entire Hayward community.

Client
Hayward Area Recreation & Park
District
Location
Hayward, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Surveying
Project Size
17 Acres
Project Timeline
2012-2022

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 13
Olympus Park | Transforming a blank slate
The City of Encinitas tasked RRM with transforming a blank slate of land into a 3.1-acre neighborhood park. A robust public outreach process defined community’s desires and set the program, including space for yoga and fitness classes, dog park, skate feature and bike pump track, colorful play elements with an adventure hill, picnicking, shade structures, public art, and a garden designed in collaboration with the San Diego Botanical Garden.

After the conceptual design was set, RRM continued into construction documents and later supported construction. The ongoing success of this park was due to effective public outreach and collaboration with City staff, namely Public Works, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts Department, and maintenance staff. RRM listened to the concerns of a vocal community to account for challenges and design a park that everyone is proud to support.

Olympus Park has been honored with several awards and remains a top visited park in San Diego County.

Client
City of Encinitas
Location
Encinitas, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Surveying
Project Size

3.1 Acres
Timeline
2017-2021

14 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Paige Lane Neighborhood Park
A collaborative vision come to life
Funded by the Conejo Recreation and Park District and the City of Thousand Oaks, Paige Lane Neighborhood Park embodies the city’s master plan vision by bringing valuable recreational opportunities to the community. The park’s thoughtfully designed amenities include a multi-use court, sand volleyball court, playground, parking lot, solar-powered restroom, fitness stations, and three shaded picnic areas with BBQ pits. Paying tribute to the Chumash people, the playground features a thematic design. A network of multi-use bike and equestrian trails borders the park, seamlessly connecting to a larger trail system throughout the Conejo Valley.

Designed with sustainability in mind, the park boasts drought-tolerant landscaping and a water-efficient irrigation system. Permeable asphalt pathways, looping around the park and connecting the fitness stations, enhance stormwater drainage. Existing trees were preserved and existing boulders were utilized throughout the project and incorporated into the improved drainage swale. Paige Lane Neighborhood Park is a shining example of collaboration and community spirit, offering a vibrant space for recreation, connection, and environmental stewardship.

Client
Conejo Recreation and Park District
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Structural Engineering
• Surveying
Project Size
14 Acres

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 15
Sapwi Trails Community Park
Harmonizing Recreation with Nature
A commitment to development with low environmental impacts led Jim Friedl, CRPD General Manager, to proclaim that Sapwi Trails is “what parks of the future are going to look like.” RRM thoughtfully prioritized both recreation and ecological preservation in the development of the design, resulting in a comprehensive plan that harmonizes active facilities with the surrounding natural system. In the approximately 17 developed acres there is no irrigated turf, a model for sustainable park design.

Nestled amidst residential neighborhoods, the Lang Creek riparian corridor meanders through the site’s undulating terrain, offering a serene retreat in the heart of suburbia. The park features several unusual facilities, including a model plane launching area, a cross-country course, a bike skills park, and an extensive disc golf course that takes maximum advantage of the dynamic topography.

Client
Conejo Recreation and Park District
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Surveying
Key Features & Elements
• Multi-Use Trails
• Playground
• Bike Park
• Pump Track
Project Size
17 Developed Acres
Excellence in Design
Park Planning Community,
Class 2
- California Park & Recreation
Society (CPRS)

16 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Righetti Ranch Parks
Where community, nature, and recreation unite
The City of San Luis Obispo hired RRM Design Group to design three new parks in the Righetti Ranch neighborhood: an 11-acre community park, a 1-acre dog park and community garden, and a pocket park. The centerpiece of the project – the community park – features numerous active and passive elements including pickleball, basketball, bocce and tennis courts, a bike park, playground, picnic areas, and multi-use playing fields. All these features are creatively located around an existing riparian corridor that bisects the site, which will be restored as a part of the project. RRM is preparing conceptual design and construction documents, and the parks are anticipated to be constructed by 2025.

Client & Location
City of San Luis Obispo
The RRM Teams Involved
• Landscape Architecture
• Architecture
• Civil Engineering
• Structural Engineering
• Surveying
Project Timeline
2022-Present

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 17
Local Projects
RRM has worked with the City and County of Santa Cruz on key recreation infrastructure projects and planning documents for the past two decades.
1 2

1. Santa Cruz Rail Trail Segments
7, 8, 9, 10, & 11

2. Monterey Bay Sanctuary
Scenic Trail Master Plan

3. Arana Gulch Master Plan

4. Twin Lakes Beachfront
Improvements

5. Santa Cruz Downtown
Design Standards

6. Santa Cruz Rail Trail Arts
Master Plan
Not Pictured:

1. Watsonville Rail Trail

2. Watsonville Slough Farm Trails

3. Santa Cruz County ADU
Pre-Approved Buildings
3 4
5 6

18 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Flexible Event Spaces
We’re committed to designing gathering spaces that serve as a true asset to the community. By hosting concerts, cultural festivals, farmers markets, block parties, and everyday get-togethers, these spaces provide opportunities for connection, celebrate local culture, and support a vibrant public life. With comfort, flexibility, and enduring quality at the forefront, we create environments that enhance the character and vitality of a community.

1. Harbor View Park, Oxnard

2. Kennedy Park, Hayward

3. Pleasanton All-Abilities Playground

4. King City Plaza

5. Ventura Harbor Village
1 2
3 4
5

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 19
Pump Tracks
Pump tracks are an increasingly popular recreation feature, and RRM has experience incorporating them into parks in ways that support a wide range of users. In collaboration with specialized designers, including our partner Wormhoudt Inc., we help ensure pump tracks are compatible with surrounding uses, circulation, and park operations.

RRM + Wormhoudt Inc. Projects Pictured

1. Sapwi Trails Community Park, Thousand Oaks

2. Tennyson Park, Hayward

3. Berkeley Bike Park
Wormhoudt Inc. Projects Pictured

4. San Jose Bike Park

5. Marina Bike Park
1 3
2 5
4

20 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Public Outreach
Our community outreach style is reflective of our personalities – down-to-earth, flexible, and passionate.

Although we are easy to get along with, we also care deeply about the projects we work on. As a result, we spend time upfront strategizing with you on outreach processes, managing expectations, and communicating project parameters. It is extremely important that people see beyond their priorities to understand how everyone’s needs must be balanced. We help bring understanding to the process by clearly illustrating how and why input has or has not been integrated at each design phase. By building on the outreach steps participants become part of the process and are much more likely to take ownership of the design when the time for plan adoption comes.

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 21

1. Pleasanton All-Abilities Playground

2. Tennyson Park Master Plan, Hayward

3. Heather Farm Community Aquatic Center,
Walnut Creek

4. Clarke Ranch Master Plan, American Canyon

5. Springtown Open Space Master Plan,
Livermore
1 2 2
3 4
5

22 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Operations and Maintenance Planning
A Park Designed for Long Term Care and Sustainability
Designing a park that performs beautifully on opening day is only part of the goal—the true measure of success is how well it functions, ages, and adapts over time. RRM approaches every project with a commitment to long-term serviceability, embedding sustainable materials, efficient systems, and maintenance-forward thinking from the earliest stages of design. Our work at San Lorenzo Community Park illustrates this approach. One of the design features includes an ornamental lake and constructed wetland that treats stormwater on site and reuses it for irrigation, reducing long-term operational demands while enhancing ecological value.

For Skypark, we will apply the same principles, prioritizing low-water-use plantings, durable materials, and design solutions that align with the City’s available resources. Early engagement with maintenance staff helps confirm that the park’s features, systems, and landscape strategies are not only inspiring but also practical to operate and maintain for decades.

To further strengthen this effort, our team includes Tom Hare, a former Administrator with the Conejo Recreation and Park District and a recognized expert in park operations and maintenance. With more than 35 years of experience, Tom has delivered consistently safe, clean, and functional parks through data-driven maintenance planning, preventative maintenance schedules, budget forecasting, and energy, waste, and water management strategies. He specializes in developing 30-Year Capital Asset Maintenance Plans that extend the life of park infrastructure and ensure long-term fiscal sustainability.

Tom works closely with agency staff to integrate new and existing assets into organizational systems, refine maintenance practices, and identify opportunities to improve efficiency and sustainability. He also encourages partnerships with community organizations to foster shared stewardship and long-term care of public spaces.

Together, this integrated approach—sustainable design, early coordination with maintenance teams, and expert long-range planning—ensures that Skypark will remain a resilient, well-cared-for community asset for generations.
1 2

1. Sapwi Trails Community Park, Thousand Oaks: Formal MOU with Concerned Off-Road-Bicyclists Association for development, maintenance, and operations of bike park/pump track at Sapwi Trails Community Park.

2. Paige Lane Neighborhood Park, Thousand Oaks: Sustainable materials and landscaping at Paige Lane Park increases the life of park assets while reducing maintenance costs.

Firm Qualifications and Experience | Section 1 23
Demographic Analysis
Understanding who uses a park and how those needs evolve is essential to determining the ingredients of a successful park. A key goal of the Skypark Master Plan will be to identify the current community’s needs and priorities, while also analyzing local and regional trends to anticipate future demands. With more than three decades of experience working with communities throughout the Bay Area and California, RRM brings a strong understanding of common park user patterns and emerging recreation trends.

According to the 2024 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Scotts Valley is experiencing a notable demographic shift, including a decline in younger age groups and a significant increase in older residents. These trends underscore the importance of designing a park that is adaptable, inclusive, and responsive to changing demographic conditions.

RRM will work with the City to develop an implementation plan that provides flexibility to adjust park offerings as needs evolve. A phased approach is the most effective way to achieve this. A recent example is San Lorenzo Park, a 30-acre project where we facilitated community outreach, completed master planning, and three phases of implementation for the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District. The master plan established a comprehensive vision, and as funding became available, we helped the District and community prioritize Phase 1 improvements to align with available resources.

As additional funding emerged, it became clear that community preferences and construction costs had shifted. This required thoughtful adjustments to Phases 2 and 3—including replacing proposed bocce courts in the plan with a flexible community gathering area for picnicking and events. Additional amenity and material refinements ensured the park remained aligned with current demographic needs and budget realities. Today, we are completing construction administration on the third and final phase, resulting in a beloved 30-acre community asset at the heart of San Lorenzo. We look forward to partnering with you to enhance Scotts Valley’s next community jewel—a park that reflects the needs of today’s residents while remaining adaptable for tomorrow.

Pictured: Memorial Park, San Leandro

25 2
Section Two:

Project Approach/Written Proposal
Proposal for
Skypark Master Plan
Pictured:

Greenwood Park,
Hayward, CA

26 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Approach
Our team is committed to partnering with the City of Scotts Valley to shape a thoughtful, inclusive, and implementable Master Plan for Skypark—one that honors the park’s role as the City’s largest community gathering space while positioning it to evolve alongside the future Town Center. Skypark is already a beloved, highly active park that hosts daily recreation and citywide events. Our approach focuses on helping your community build upon these strengths while addressing the park’s changing neighborhood, aging infrastructure, and growing demands.

We understand Skypark’s unique context: a former airport site transformed into a central civic landscape, adjacent to future mixed-use development and serving a wide range of users—from families and athletes to event-goers and passive recreation users. The Master Plan is an opportunity to re-energize Skypark as a flexible, connected, and resilient park that supports everyday use, signature events, and long-term stewardship. Below is how we will approach the Skypark Master Plan and the value we will bring to the City.

We are Park Specialists
We bring a dedicated park planning and design team with deep experience in landscape architecture, park master planning, community engagement, and public-sector project implementation. Our parks-focused practice allows us to seamlessly integrate site planning, programming, circulation, accessibility, sustainability, and operations considerations from the earliest phases of the project through completion.

This integrated approach ensures that conceptual ideas are grounded in feasibility, maintenance realities, and a long-term phased implementation plan. Throughout the process, we collaborate closely across disciplines to produce clear, actionable recommendations that support phased investment and future grant funding.

Our experience with complex, highly programmed, multi-generational community parks—similar in scale and intensity to Skypark—positions us to anticipate challenges, identify opportunities and trends, and avoid common pitfalls (such as impractical placement of dissimilar amenities) as the Master Plan develops.

Pictured: Greenwood Park, Hayward

Project Approach/Written Proposal | Section 2 27
Site-Informed and Contextual Design Approach
Our design process begins with a deep understanding of place. For Skypark, this means closely studying existing conditions, amenities, circulation patterns, infrastructure, and relationships to adjacent neighborhoods and the future Town Center.

We will spend time on-site to observe how the park functions throughout the day, how people move, where conflicts occur, and which spaces succeed or present opportunities. Particular attention will be paid to areas impacted by the Town Center development, including the relocation of temporary amenities such as the dog park and pump track, as well as opportunities for shared access, edges, and landscape continuity.

Rather than applying a one-size-fits-all solution, our goal is to develop a Master Plan that addresses Skypark’s specific history, physical constraints, and community identity, reinforcing its role as both a neighborhood park and a citywide destination.

Community Engagement: A Park for Everyone with a Distinct Sense of Place Community engagement is central to our approach and experience—not simply as a requirement, but as an essential design tool. Skypark serves a broad, diverse user base across multiple generations, and its future success depends on understanding how different groups use the park today and how it should be envisioned tomorrow.

We will work closely with City staff to develop an inclusive, accessible outreach strategy that meets people where they are. Engagement tools may include community workshops, electronic surveys, pop-up onsite events, and friendly/strategic stakeholder interviews, allowing for both in-depth discussion and broad participation. Our well-tested outreach process is designed to gather meaningful tactical input while also clearly communicating City policy guardrails, program and amenity opportunities, constraints, and trade-offs of various design paths.

We approach engagement with open minds and without preconceived solutions. Our role is to listen, synthesize feedback, and translate community values into a cohesive and functional Master Plan that reflects Scotts Valley’s identity and aspirations. We blend this local ownership with our state-wide experience of park design and construction.

28 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Creating a Flexible and Enduring Park
Framework
Skypark must balance daily use with larger-scale events, organized sports with informal recreation, and active
zones with quieter, restorative spaces. Our approach
emphasizes flexibility—designing spaces that can adapt
over time as community needs, programming, and
funding evolve.

We will explore opportunities to enhance internal park
circulation, improve accessibility and pedestrian safety, and clarify relationships between different activity zones.

Many areas in a park are compatible, such as games near picnic areas, whereas other areas, like adult basketball and children’s play areas, are better separated. Event
infrastructure, shade, seating, and support amenities
will be carefully considered to improve comfort and
functionality for both everyday users and special events. By establishing clear guiding principles and a strong spatial framework, the Master Plan will support future improvements without requiring constant reinvention.

Sustainability, Maintenance, and Long-Term Stewardship
A successful Master Plan must be both aspirational and realistic. From the outset, we integrate sustainability and maintenance considerations into our design thinking. For Skypark, this includes exploring drought-tolerant landscapes, durable materials, efficient irrigation, and low-maintenance operations strategies.

We will engage City operations and maintenance staff early in the process to understand existing capabilities, priorities, and long-term constraints, ensuring that proposed recommendations are practical, supportable, and aligned with available resources. One of our RRM team members, Tom Hare, will serve as the project’s Operations and Maintenance Expert. Formerly the Director of Operations for the Conejo Recreation and Park District, Tom brings deep experience in park operations and maintenance, as well as capital improvement planning, to help shape a design that responds directly to City budgeting processes and staff capabilities. This collaborative, operations-informed approach helps ensure the park not only presents a compelling vision on paper but continues to perform effectively and sustainably for years after implementation.

Pictured: Memorial Park, San Leandro
Pictured: Kennedy Park, Hayward

Project Approach/Written Proposal | Section 2 29
Collaborative Design with City Staff and Partners
We view City staff as essential collaborators in the Master Plan process. Their institutional knowledge, operational insight, and understanding of community priorities are invaluable to shaping a successful plan. Our team is highly responsive and flexible, and we welcome iterative feedback throughout the process. We do not bring a rigid or signature design style; instead, we focus on solutions that align with the City’s goals, standards, and long-term vision—while remaining responsive to public input, evolving project conditions, and emerging trends in recreation.

Phasing, Cost Awareness, and Implementation Strategy
We understand that Skypark improvements will be implemented over time and through multiple funding sources. As such, the Master Plan will include clear phasing strategies and planning-level cost estimates to support informed decision-making.

Our approach emphasizes transparency around costs, constructibility, and priorities. By identifying logical phases, funding opportunities, and potential partnerships, the Master Plan becomes a practical tool the City can actively use to guide capital investment, grant applications, and future project development.

SAN LORENZO PARK PHASE 2 - VALUE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
Based on 100% CD Estimate by Leland Saylor Associates, dated June 12, 2015 *Total is based on 6/12/15 estimate, plus subsequent escalation discussion with LSA LSA Estimated Total*: $ 16,000,000 Estimated Savings: $ 2,987,939
New Estimated Total: $ 13,012,061
No. Item Description Deduct Add Net Savings
1 Demolition - Pond Completed in Phase 1 $ 12,260 $ 12,260 2 8" Fire Line Completed in Phase 1 $ 44,550 $ 44,550

3.a Synthetic Turf Remove 257,380 sf of synthetic turf playing field $ 2,316,420 $ 2,316,420

3.b Synthetic Turf Add 257,380 sf of natural grass $1.25/sf $ 321,725 $ (321,725) 4 Softball Improvements Completed in Phase 1 $ 83,020 $ 83,020 5 Bocce Replace limestone and oyster shell with D.G. $ 35,616 $ 35,616 6 Playgrounds Remove "pond" playground next to bocce area $ 266,000 $ 266,000 7 Playgrounds Remove day care yard play equipment $ 23,000 $ 23,000 9 Buildings Remove soccer concession building $ 203,253 $ 203,253 10 Buildings Remove soccer shade shelters (6) $ 52,903 $ 52,903 11 Buildings Remove stage canopy at amphitheater $ 64,411 $ 64,411 12 Concrete Remove 15% of flatwork through redesign $ 105,700 $ 105,700 13 Concrete Replace 10,000 sf of vehicular paving with pedestrian rated $ 10,000 $ 10,000 14 Amphitheater Remove concrete terraces/steps/walls $ 68,531 $ 68,531 15 Amphitheater Remove circular benches around trees at top $ 24,000 $ 24,000 3 13
9 10
14 11
15 5
6 7
Commitment to a Clear, Actionable Master Plan
Ultimately, our goal is to deliver a Skypark Master Plan that illustrates a vision that is forward-looking, grounded by the City’s funding parameters—one that reflects community values, integrates with the future Town Center, and provides the City of Scotts Valley with a clear roadmap for the park’s next few chapters. We are excited about the opportunity to help shape Skypark’s future and to partner with the City in creating a park that continues to serve as a cornerstone of community life for decades to come.

Pictured: San Lorenzo Park Value Engineering Exhibit

30 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Scope of Services
The following scope of services outlines a comprehensive evaluation and re-imagining of the existing Skypark site. It includes community outreach, planning, design, phasing, and long term management strategies to ensure the park supports desired programming and adapts to the evolving needs of the community.

Task 1: Project Initiation and Background Review
RRM will participate in a kickoff meeting with City staff to confirm goals, schedule, and deliverables. We will review background materials, including the 2024 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2025 Town Center Specific Plan, previous site plans, and event/programming data provided by the City. We will also conduct an initial site visit to assess existing park conditions and operational context. Further assessment will take place in Task 2.0.

Deliverables:
• Kickoff meeting in person with City team
• Site visit on same day as kickoff meeting
• Review of City provided background documents
Task 2.0: Site Inventory, Needs Assessment, and Topographic Survey RRM will conduct a site analysis to evaluate existing facilities, including amenities, infrastructure, circulation, accessibility (ADA), landscape conditions, and overall visual character to identify constraints, deficiencies, and opportunities for improvement. Findings and recommendations will be documented in a site analysis summary for City review.

The summary will also include a needs assessment section that considers demographics, usage trends, programming needs identified in the 2024 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and regional recreation patterns to inform programming that remains adaptable and responsive to changing demographic conditions.

RRM will perform field survey work to prepare a topographic map. The topographic survey will be comprised of an aerial survey, field survey, and detailed topographic features, such as items not shown in sufficient detail in the aerial topographic map, and obtain spot elevations to define the general terrain to produce mapping at a 1-foot contour interval. This work will include visible site features such as roadways, pavements, evidence of significant traveled ways, walls, fences, trees 4 inches and larger in diameter, and visual surface utility infrastructure. This data will be incorporated into the digital base map.

Deliverables:
• Site analysis exhibit
• Needs assessment summary
• Topographic survey - digital topographic map file in AutoCAD Format Task 3.0: Community and Stakeholder Engagement
RRM will collaborate with City staff to develop a community outreach strategy that is meaningful, inclusive, and accessible. This will include an implementation plan for engagement activities that builds on the work completed during the Citywide Parks Master Plan and includes community workshops, stakeholder interviews, online surveys, and pop-up events to gather feedback that informs the visioning and concept design process.

The following deliverables reflect the requirements of the RFP and RRM’s experience and will be refined in coordination with City staff.

Project Approach/Written Proposal | Section 2 31
Deliverables:
• Community engagement strategy summary
• Stakeholder meetings- one half day of meetings with stakeholders selected by City staff. • Community engagement meetings - two (2) public meetings: one (1) prior to concept generation; one (1) presentation of concept alternatives. Meetings are assumed to be virtual, town hall, open house, or pop-up format. Includes participation metrics and key findings. • Online Surveys - two (2) online community surveys: one (1) prior to concept generation; one (1) including concept alternatives. Includes participation metrics and key findings. • Two (2) virtual City staff meetings during outreach process. • Meeting and workshop materials include agendas and preparation of graphics created in Tasks 2.0 and

4.0. Task 4.0: Vision and Concept Design & Preferred Concept RRM will develop guiding principles and a long-term vision statement for Skypark based on community input, needs assessment findings, and feedback from stakeholders and City staff. Concept plan alternatives will be prepared to reflect community priorities, site assessments, and key considerations such as phasing, cost parameters, maintenance, and operations. Typically, two concept alternatives are sufficient to capture the full range of community needs and preferences; however, an optional third concept is included should the City wish to explore another plan.

Following input on the plan alternatives, RRM will prepare a preferred concept plan, which will likely include a combination of features and improvements prioritized by the community and staff. Plan graphics will illustrate all park amenities and features, including parking, circulation, buildings, landscape areas, and activity zones.

Deliverables:
• List of guiding principles and a long-term vision statement • Two (2) concept plan alternatives in color
• Two (2) planning-level cost estimate statements to accompany the two (2) plan alternatives • One (1) additional concept alternative - optional
• One (1) additional planning-level cost estimate statement to accompany the additional plan alternative - optional
• One (1) staff input meeting on the concept plan alternatives prior to presentation to community • One (1) preferred concept plan in color
• Phasing plan exhibit including cost strategy
• One (1) staff input meeting on the preferred concept plan prior to presentation to community • Two perspective sketch renderings - optional
Task 5.0: Master Plan Development
RRM will prepare the Master Plan, including preferred plan exhibits and a summary report with recommendations to support the phased development of the park. The report will summarize recommendations for programming, construction, and long term park stewardship. It will also document how public engagement informed and shaped the design process. The draft plan will be reviewed by City staff, Parks and Recreation Commission, and City Council.

32 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Deliverables:
• Summary report (summary of design process, does not circulate for public comment) • Insert graphic from preferred plan task
• Public engagement summary-selection of preferred plan • Findings from task 2.0 needs assessment
• Planning level cost estimate summary
• Programming opportunities and event infrastructure
• Design and maintenance guidelines - materials, finishes, product types • Site palette including conceptual landscape, site furnishings, and lighting • Operations and maintenance recommendations
• Phasing and implementation strategy description
• 2025 Town Center integration and connection summary
• Environmental review summary (CEQA screening memo): short memo documenting whether plan is categorically exempt and outlining potential next steps for environmental review from Task 6.0:

Environmental Review Memo
• Presentation of Master Plan at (2) public hearings: Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council • Provide all final materials in editable digital formats (Word, InDesign, and CAD compatible formats as applicable), along with print-ready PDFs.

Task 6.0: Environmental Review Memo
RRM’s subconsultant David J. Powers & Associates will provide environmental and CEQA related support for the Skypark Master Plan. Their work includes identifying environmental constraints relevant to potential CEQA pathways using information from the 2025 Scotts Valley Town Center Specific Plan Update EIR and the Scotts Valley General Plan, including reviewing prior City documents, summarizing constraints, and offering early input based on major development assumptions such as whether an amphitheater is proposed. They will also review the conceptual design plan and prepare a CEQA screening memo that identifies the appropriate CEQA pathway for the Master Plan based on proposed improvements and phasing; this early memo will help the City understand key planning considerations and any factors that may limit CEQA exemptions. Once the Master Plan is finalized, David J. Powers & Associates will update and finalize the CEQA screening memo. If the final Master Plan differs substantially from the preferred concept used in the draft memo, additional time and budget may be required.

Deliverables:
• Up to four (4) hours of technical review of existing documents and summary of environmental constraints
• One (1) virtual staff meeting to discuss findings from review of existing documents and any potential constraints
• Draft CEQA screening memo based on preferred concept plan • One (1) virtual staff meeting to discuss draft CEQA screening memo • Final CEQA screening memo
• One (1) virtual staff meeting to discuss final CEQA screening memo Task 7.0: Project Management
RRM’s point of contact and project manager will coordinate with City staff and Town Center representatives via email and phone to provide updates on deliverables, public engagement, and design decisions. The project schedule will be updated as needed to reflect requests from staff and to reflect any changes not known at the time of initial publication.

Project Approach/Written Proposal | Section 2 33
Deliverables:
• Up to forty (40) hours of project management, including project schedule creation and updates, phone calls, meetings not included as part of other tasks, and emails with City staff and Town Center Development representatives.

Scope and Budget Considerations
The City's response to questions/answers references an available budget of $50,000-$80,000. Our proposed scope and fee provide a complete design process and deliverables for the master plan as outlined in the RFP.

Our experience shows that we cannot deliver that product for the stated budget. However, we believe we can deliver a high quality park master site plan process in a streamlined effort to meet this targeted budget, which would include the following:
• Site analysis
• Community engagement
• Two (2) concept plan alternatives
• One (1) preferred concept plan
• Two (2) public hearing - environmental review memo
• Project management and client meetings

35 3
Section Three:

Project Team's Resumes
Proposal for
Skypark Master Plan
Pictured:

Sunset Park Playground,
Livermore, CA

36 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Principal with 23 years
of experience
Education
• Master of Business
Administration, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
• Bachelor of Landscape
Architecture, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses and more
• Professional Landscape
Architect, CA, 6040
• Bay Friendly Qualified
Landscape Professional (BFQ)
Gina Chavez | PLA, BFQ Professional
Project Role: Principal-in-Charge + Project Manager
Gina Chavez transmutes her love for art and nature into harmonious outdoor spaces that all people can enjoy. As an experienced landscape architect, specializing in park and trail projects, Gina offers an acute eye for design. Invested in every aspect of the process, from concept to construction, Gina is committed to outstanding project execution. Her attention to detail and willingness to adapt fosters a comprehensive and collaborative design approach–benefiting both her clients and her team.

Featured project experience
• Blue Rock Springs Park
Master Plan, Vallejo
• Camp Sweeney Sports Field
Conceptual Design, San
Leandro
• Central Park Master Plan
Update, San Mateo
• Central Park Playground
Renovation and Memorial
Grove, San Mateo
• Clarke Ranch Park Master Plan,
American Canyon
• Contra Loma Estates Park
Renovation, Antioch
• Dublin Sports Grounds
Master Plan and Construction
Administration
• East 14th Street Park, Hayward
• Greenwood Park Construction
Support, Hayward
• Heather Farm Community
Center and Aquatics Center,
Walnut Creek
• Ken Mercer Sports Park
Skate Park, Pleasanton
• Kennedy Park Construction
Documents and Construction
Support, Hayward
• Livermore Downtown Core
Landscape Concept and
Stockmen’s Park
• Mateo Street Park, Hayward
• Memorial Park Construction
Documents, San Leandro
• Pleasant Oaks Park Playground
Concept, Pleasant Hill
• Pleasanton All-Abilities
Playground Master Plan
• Redwood City Downtown Parks
and Bay Connectivity
• San Felipe Park Master Plan,
Hayward
• San Lorenzo Community Center
Construction Administration
• San Lorenzo Community Park
Construction Documents,
Construction Administration,
and Construction Support
• San Pablo Park Improvements,
Berkeley
• Springtown Open Space
Master Plan and Phase 1
Implementation, Livermore
• Tennyson Park Master Plan
and Construction Documents,
Hayward
• Veterans Park, Livermore
• Via Toledo Neighborhood Park
Master Plan, Hayward
• Weekes Park Master Plan,
Hayward
• William Payne Park Master
Plan, Livermore
“Gina Chavez has been
an exceptional partner
with the City of Pleasanton
on our projects. My trust and
faith in Gina has grown as our
projects have progressed.”
- Matt Gruber, Landscape Architect,
City of Pleasanton

Project Team's Resumes | Section 3 37
Managing Partner with
40 years of experience
Education
• Bachelor of Science, Landscape
Architecture, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses and more
• Professional Landscape
Architect, CA, 2844
• American Society of Landscape
Architects (ASLA), member
• Arroyo Grande Watershed
Forum Steering Committee,
2000-2006
• California Parks and Recreation
Society (CPRS), member
• National Recreation and Park
Association, member
• Cal Poly Landscape Architecture
Department Advisory
Committee, member
Jeff Ferber | ASLA, PLA
Project Role: Development Liaison/Strategic Advisor
With an early love for the outdoors and a desire to serve the greater community, Jeff Ferber was led to a career in landscape architecture from a young age. Providing over 30 years of experience at RRM, Jeff’s keen ability to translate public needs into a relatable design is reflected in each of his projects. As a managing partner of the firm, he offers a team-style approach to leadership and design. With experience in the public and private sectors, focusing on park and planning design, Jeff strives to transmute the collective vision into reality. Valuing effective communication and mutual respect, he is committed to fulfilling the needs of both the client and the community through precise project execution.

Featured project experience
• Central Park Master Plan
Update, San Mateo
• Clarke Ranch Park Master Plan,
American Canyon
• Columbus Park Sports Facility
Design, San Jose
• Dublin Sports Grounds Master
Plan
• Fairmont Terrace Park Master
Plan, Hayward
• Greenwood Park Renovation,
Hayward
• Heather Farm Community
Center and Aquatics Center,
Walnut Creek
• Kennedy Park, Hayward
• Ken Mercer Sports Park Skate
Park, Pleasanton
• Meek Estate Park Construction
Documents, Hayward
• Mia’s Dream Come True
Playground, Hayward
• Olympus Park Design, Encinitas
• Ortega Park and Dwight
Murphy Field Design Services
(+ Gwendolyn’s Playground),
Santa Barbara
• Redwood City Downtown Parks
and Bay Connectivity
• Righetti Ranch Neighborhood
Park, San Luis Obispo
• San Lorenzo Community Park
• Sapwi Trails Community Park,
Thousand Oaks
• Springtown Open Space Master
Plan, Livermore
• Taylor Mountain Regional Park,
Santa Rosa
• Tennyson Park Master Plan,
Hayward
• Veterans Park, Livermore
• Via Toledo Neighborhood Park
Master Plan, Hayward
• Waller Park Master Plan, Orcutt
• Weekes Park Master Plan,
Hayward
• William Payne Park Master
Plan, Livermore

38 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Manager of Landscape
Architecture with 19
years of experience
Education
• Bachelor of Landscape
Architecture, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, San Luis
Obispo, CA
Licenses and more
• Professional Landscape
Architect, CA, 6210
• Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED AP)
Lance Wierschem | PLA, LEED AP
Project Role: Master Plan Document Lead
With a sharp artistic eye, Lance Wierschem’s detailed design enhances the artistry of each project he is involved in. As an experienced landscape architect and planner, Lance offers an expansive view of design. From trails and recreational parks to public and community centers, Lance’s versatile experience serves both his team and his clients. Engaged in all aspects of project administration, from visioning to construction, his alliance to creative collaboration is reflected in his work. Both his collaborative efforts and his artistic vision guide Lance’s design process, elevating outdoor spaces into captivating environments for all to enjoy.

Featured project experience
• Alex Fiore Teen Center and
Goebel Adult Center, Thousand
Oaks
• Bakersfield Sports Village
Phase III
• City Heritage Park, Parlier
• Conejo Recreation and Park
District Master Plan,
Thousand Oaks
• Crescent City Beachfront Park
Master Plan
• Joseph Grant County Park
Master Plan Update, Mt.

Hamilton
• Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic
Trail Network Master Plan
• North Ranch Neighborhood
Park, Thousand Oaks
• Paige Lane Neighborhood Park,
Thousand Oaks
• Porterville Fourth Street
Community Center
• San Lorenzo Community Park
Construction Documents
• Santa Fe Bike Trail Connection,
Visalia
• Sapwi Trails Community Park,
Thousand Oaks
• Taylor Mountain Park Master
Plan, Santa Rosa
• Thompson Park, Selma
• Ventura Harbor Village
Master Plan
• Zumwalt Park Renovation Final
Design, Tulare

Project Team's Resumes | Section 3 39
Design Director with 20
years of experience
Education
• Bachelor of Landscape
Architecture, Visual Expression,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo, San
Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses and more
• Professional Landscape
Architect, CA, 6504
• Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED AP)
• Surfrider Foundation, Member,
2013-present
Amanda Seibel | PLA, LEED AP
Project Role: Park Design
For over 20 years, Amanda has been transforming outdoor spaces into masterful products of design. With a keen artistic vision and design sense, Amanda offers a unique lens to landscape architecture. Her ability to refine concepts into detailed project completion serves as an asset to all who work with her. True artistry and compassion guide her design process, from idea through implementation. Specializing in park and recreational design, Amanda brings her talent to every project she is involved in. Incorporating the creative vision of both her client and her team of fellow designers, Amanda is committed to enhancing natural spaces for the benefit of all individuals.

Featured project experience
• 27 Acre Park, Wildomar
• Camp Sweeney Sports Field,
Alameda
• Fairmont Terrace Park Master
Plan, Hayward
• Furman Park, Downey
• Kennedy Park Master Plan,
Hayward
• La Mirada Creek Park Master
Plan
• La Palma Green Promenade
and Paseo, Anaheim
• Lindero Linear Park, Westlake
Village
• Newman Nature Park
• Olympus Park Design, Encinitas
• Promenade on Forest, Orange
• Righetti Ranch Neighborhood
Park, San Luis Obispo
• San Lorenzo Community Park
Master Plan
• Santa Barbara Island Park/
West Side Monument (Channel
Islands), Oxnard
• Scott Valley Park Playground
Replacement, Encinitas
• Thompson Park, Selma
• Veterans Park, Livermore
• Waller Park Master Plan, Orcutt
• Weekes Park Master Plan,
Hayward
• Zumwalt Park Conceptual
Design, Tulare

40 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Principal Park Planner
with 27 years of
experience
Education
• Master of Business
Administration, California State
University, Fullerton, Fullerton,
CA
• Bachelor of Science,
Mechanical Engineering,
United States Naval Academy,
Annapolis, MD
Licenses and more
• National Honorary Mechanical
Engineering Fraternity
• Registered Professional
Engineer, Mechanical
Engineering
• Play Conejo, Co-founder, Board
Member, and current Vice
President of non-profit public
charity organization
*Work completed prior to joining
RRM
Tom Hare
Project Role: Operations and Maintenance Expert
Tom followed his Navy and City facilities positions with a 16 year career at Conejo Recreation and Park District (CRPD), planning, implementing and maintaining facility projects similar to many of PVRDP’s projects and parks. Tom will provide insight and recommendations to improve RRM’s responsiveness to project goals and objectives for successful construction and realistic maintenance expectations. Tom’s experience also includes effectively transitioning capital projects from design to construction to maintenance and operations. He excels in strategic and financial planning, forecasting, and effective management of operational and capital budgets.

Featured project experience
• Bohemian Park Renovation RFP
Pre and Post-Award Assistance,
Sacramento
• Conejo Recreation and Park
District*
◦ Administrator, Parks and
Planning at Conejo Recreation
and Park District
◦ Responsible for Capital
Improvement Project
programs totaling over
$190M
◦ Responsible for maintenance
and operational budgets
totaling over $220M
• Fulton-El Camino Recreation
and Park District Multi-Year
Capital Improvement Plan,
Sacramento
• Lampson Park Place Park
Impact Analysis, Seal Beach

Project Team's Resumes | Section 3 41
Manager of Engineering
Services with 17 years of
experience
Education
• Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
Licenses and more
• Professional Engineer, CA,
78227
• CA Certified Stormwater
Prevention Plan
Scott Yoshida | PE, QSD/P
Project Role: Civil Engineer
With over a decade of experience in civil engineering and land development, Scott Yoshida brings a vast skillset to RRM. As project manager, his duties are wide-ranging -- from preparing and overseeing contracts, budgets and schedules to coordinating multidisciplinary teams.

Specializing in site-grading and drainage, utility design, and roadway engineering, Scott’s projects include residential subdivisions, apartment complexes, solar farms, wineries and hotels. As a Qualified SWPPP Preparer/Practitioner (QSD/QSP), Scott also has extensive knowledge of state, regional and local stormwater requirements, LID design, and implementation. His far-reaching expertise makes him one of RRM’s trusted leaders.

Featured project experience
• Anholm Urban Greening Grant
Award, San Luis Obispo
• Ashland Park, Hayward
• Columbus Park Sports Facility
Design, San Jose
• Mt. Madonna Valley View
Campgrounds Improvements,
Watsonville
• Redwood City Downtown Parks
and Bay Connectivity
• San Luis Obispo Fire Station
No. 1 Vehicle Wash Area
Stormwater Management
System
• Thompson Park, Selma
• Branch Elementary School New
Multipurpose Building and Four
Classrooms, Arroyo Grande
• Cultural Arts District Parking
Structure, San Luis Obispo
• Dana Reserve Specific Plan,
Nipomo
• Grover Heights Elementary
School Multipurpose Room,
Grover Beach
• Paseo Pacifico Specific Plan,
Madera
• Santa Maria Airport Business
Park Specific Plan Amendment
• Scotts Valley Fire Station No. 1
• Solomon Hills Site Specific Plan,
Orcutt

42 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Supervisor of Surveying
with 25 year of
experience
Education
• Associates of Science, Surveying
and Forest Practices, Kings River
Community College, Reedley, CA
Licenses and more
• Professional Land Surveyor, CA,
10029
Brian Hellwig
Project Role: Surveyor
As Supervisor of Surveying, Brian Hellwig brings over two decades of surveying experience to RRM Design Group. With a background in forestry, he offers a well-rounded perspective to each project he works on. From commercial sites to residential and mixed-use developments, Brian’s projects span across sectors. In addition to his vast project experience, he’s well-versed in a range of high-tech surveying equipment and software, such as three-dimensional terrestrial laser scanning, GPS, and robotic stations. Ultimately, Brian’s technical expertise and handson approach make him, not only an expert surveyor at RRM, but an acclaimed leader as well.

Featured project experience
• Alex Fiore Teen Center and
Goebel Adult Center Master Plan,
Thousand Oaks
• Central Park Master Plan Update,
San Mateo
• Columbus Park Soccer Facility
Design, San Jose
• Conejo Creek Park Bike Path,
Thousand Oaks
• Coyote Creek Parkway Perry’s
Hill, Morgan Hill
• Downey Measure S Park -
Furman Park
• Downey Measure S Park -
Independence Park
• East 14th Street Park, Hayward
• Grove Park Field and Playground
Renovation, Berkeley
• La Mirada Creek Park Master
Plan
• Las Positas Multi-Use Pathway,
Santa Barbara
• Mateo Street Park, Hayward
• Olympus Park Design, Encinitas
• Ortega Park and Dwight Murphy
Field Construction Documents,
Santa Barbara
• Ramona Garden Park Master
Plan, Grover Beach
• San Lorenzo Park Construction
Documents
• San Pablo Park Improvements,
Berkeley
• Santa Cruz County Regional
Transportation Commission
Boundary Survey and
Encroachment Identification
• Santa Cruz Rail Trail Segments 5,
7, 10, and 11
• Sapwi Trails Community Park,
Thousand Oaks
• Whittier Greenway Trail East

Project Team's Resumes | Section 3 43
Principal Landscape
Architect with 35 years
of experience
Education
• Bachelor of Science, Landscape
Architecture, California Poly
Technical State University, San
Luis Obispo, California
Licenses and more
• Professional Landscape
Architect, CA, 43051
Zachary Wormhoudt | PLA
Project Role: Bike Park Specialist
Zachary Wormhoudt has a Degree in Landscape Architecture from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Zach has served as senior designer for Wormhoudt Incorporated for the past 35 years and manages: public meetings, project design, document preparation and construction observation. He is an avid skater and surfer and has surfed professionally for over 40 years
Featured project experience
• Projects with RRM:
◦ 27 Acre Park, Wildomar
◦ Alex Fiore Teen Center
and Goebel Adult Center,
Thousand Oaks
◦ Greenwood Park Renovation,
Hayward
◦ Ken Mercer Sports Park Skate
Park, Pleasanton
◦ Olympus All-Wheels Park,
Encinitas
◦ Ortega Skatepark,
Santa Barbara
◦ Pacifica Skate Park
◦ Porterville Fourth Street
Community Center Pump
Track
◦ Righetti Park Pump Track,
San Luis Obispo
◦ Santa Rosa Skate Park III, San
Luis Obispo
◦ Sapwi Trails Community Park,
Thousand Oaks
◦ Tennyson Park, Hayward
◦ University Avenue Bike Park
Conceptual Design, Berkeley
◦ Vagabond Skate Park, Fresno
◦ Venice Beach Skate Park
• Calabazas Bikepark, San Jose
• Caldwell Bikepark, Redding
• Carmichael All-Wheels Park
• Carr Lake Skatepark, Salinas
• Centennial Park Bike, South San
Francisco
• Colorado Park All-Wheels Park,
Los Banos
• Constitution Pump Track,
Salinas
• Flood Park Pump Track, Menlo
Park
• Fremont Skate Park
• Hollister Pump Track
• Kamakoa Nui Pump Track, Big
Island, HI
• Lake Cunningham Bike Park,
San Jose
• Marina Pump Track
• Newark Skate Park
• Pittsburg Bikepark
• Quarry Park, Pump Track, San
Mateo
• Riverview Bike Park, San Benito
• Sunnyvale All-Wheels Park
• South Park Bikepark, Redding
• Stafford Lake Bike Park, Marin
• Thane All-Wheels Park,
Mumbai, India
• UN Skate Plaza, San Francisco
• Watsonville Pump Track

44 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan President/Principal
Project Manager with 28
years of experience
Education
• Master of City and Regional
Planning, University of
California, Berkeley, CA
• Bachelor of Science, Geological
and Environmental Sciences,
Stanford University, Stanford,
CA
Affiliations
• Association of Environmental
Professionals
Akoni Danielsen
Project Role: Principal Environmental Consultant
Akoni Danielsen is a Principal Project Manager with over 28 years of experience in planning and preparing environmental documents. Prior to joining David J. Powers & Associates in 2010 he worked for the City of San José, most recently as Principal Planner. During his time as a Principal Planner at the City of San José, Mr. Danielsen managed multiple Planning Division development work programs and coordinated with all City departments on CEQA and NEPA processes and procedures.

As a Principal Project Manager, Mr. Danielsen:
• Provides management and oversight in preparation of environmental documents by others, ensuring defensibility and consistency. Mr.

Danielsen ensures that all documents reflect the best available technical expertise.
• Researches and prepares environmental documents required under Federal and California laws including Environmental Impact Reports and Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Assessments, and Initial Studies. Mr. Danielsen is responsible for the entire project life cycle, from proposal development through report delivery and client support.

Featured project experience
• 2025 Scotts Valley Town Center
Specific Plan Update EIR
• La Vista Park Initial Study/
Addendum, Hayward
• Butterfield Park Addendum,
Morgan Hill
• Lindenville Specific Plan
Addendum, South San
Francisco
• San José Downtown Strategy
2040 Program EIR
• Los Altos High School
Expansion Project – EIR and
Various Addendums
• 505 East Bayshore Residential
EIR, Redwood City
• 557 East Bayshore Mixed-Use
EIR, Redwood City
• Alviso Hotel IS, San José
• Graniterock Capitol Site
Modernization EIR, San José
• Trade Zone Park Data Center
and Advance Manufacturing
SPPE Application, San José
• 2305 Mission College Data
Center Small Power Plant
Exemption
• San Carlos 611 Industrial Road
Electronic Sign Initial Study

Project Team's Resumes | Section 3 45
Project Manager with 7
years of experience
Education
• Bachelor of Science,
Environmental Management
and Protection, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
Affiliations
• Association of Environmental
Professionals
Desiree Dei Rossi
Project Role: Environmental Consultant
Desiree Dei Rossi is a Project Manager for the company. She works closely with other members of the staff researching and preparing documents for both private and public sector projects. Her experience includes CEQA compliance for commercial, mixed-use, residential, industrial development, public facilities and parks projects.

As a Project Manager, Ms. Dei Rossi:
• Prepares environmental documents including: Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs), Initial Studies (ISs), Categorical Exemptions (CEs) and Environmental Assessments (EAs), in conformance with the requirements of CEQA and NEPA.
• Provides detailed analysis of potential environmental impacts, identifies mitigation measures, and develops alternative solutions. • Provides project coordination including maintaining close communication with client and/or agency staff, gathering and compiling project and site information, managing subconsultants, and project scheduling.

Featured project experience
• 2025 Scotts Valley Town Center
Specific Plan Update EIR
• St James Park Capital Vision
and Performing Arts Pavilion,
San José
• Veterans Memorial Senior
Center/YMCA, Redwood City
• Los Altos High School
Expansion Project – Various
Addendums
• San Jose Downtown Strategy
2040 Program EIR
• 505 East Bayshore Residential
EIR, Redwood City
• 557 East Bayshore Mixed-Use
EIR, Redwood City
• Alviso Hotel IS, San José
• San Jose International Airport
Master Plan Update EIR
• Graniterock Capitol Site
Modernization EIR, San José
• Trade Zone Park Data Center
and Advance Manufacturing
SPPE Application, San José
• 2305 Mission College Data
Center Small Power Plant
Exemption
• San Carlos 611 Industrial Road
Electronic Sign Initial Study

47 4
Section Four:

Work Samples
Proposal for
Skypark Master Plan
Pictured:

Central Park Master Plan
San Mateo, CA

48 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Work Sample: Tennyson Park Master
Plan
Full Document Link
A full project description has been provided on page 6.

Client
Hayward Area Recreation and Park
District
Completion Year
Constructed in 2025
Status
Adopted and constructed

Work Samples | Section 4 49
Work Sample: Pleasanton All-Abilities
Playground Master Plan
Full Document Link
In response to the city’s commitment to inclusive recreation, RRM Design Group led the creation of the Pleasanton All-Abilities Playground Master Plan.

Recognizing the need to provide recreational opportunities for all community members, the city sought to develop a space that would cater to individuals of varying abilities and backgrounds. Engaging diverse stakeholders, including the public and City Council, our outreach efforts resulted in the adoption of the concept titled Pleasanton’s Rise Playground. Designed to inspire individuals to reach their fullest potential, the playground embodies inclusivity and community spirit. Featuring innovative play structures like a butterfly-themed central area with ramps, slides, and an accessible zipline, the design encourages people of all ages and backgrounds to play and interact side by side. Notable elements such as kite sculptures, a rainbow road of music, and star-shaped quiet pods enhance the sensory experience, creating a cherished space for all. Efforts are underway to raise funds for the playground’s implementation, to help Pleasanton’s Rise Playground becomes a beacon of unity and joy.

Client
City of Pleasanton
Completion Year
2022
Status
Adopted

51 5
Section Five:

References
Proposal for
Skypark Master Plan
Pictured:

Kennedy Park
Hayward, CA

52 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan References
Megan Tiernan
Capital Planning and Development Director
Contact: (510) 881-6716 | [email protected]
Client: Hayward Area Recreation and Park District
Projects:
• San Lorenzo Community Park, 2012-present
• Tennyson Park, 2019-present
• Kennedy Park, 2012-2022
• Mia’s Dream Come True Playground, 2017-2020
• Greenwood Park, 2012-2016
• Hayward Community Garden, 2017-2018
• Grove Park, 2021-2024
Andrew Mooney
Director, Parks and Planning
Contact: (805) 495-6471 | [email protected]
Client: Conejo Recreation and Park District
Projects:
• Paige Lane Neighborhood Park, 2018-2023
• Sapwi Trails Community Park, 2013-2021
• Alex Fiore Teen Center and Goebel Adult Center,
2019-2023
• Conejo Recreation and Park District Master Plan,
2021-present
Greg Avakian
Director of Parks and Recreation
Contact: (805) 781-7120 | [email protected]
Client: City of San Luis Obispo
Projects:
• Righetti Ranch Parks, 2022-present

53 Section Six:

Proposed Fees
Proposal For Skypark Master Plan
Pictured: Pleasanton All-Abilities Playground, Pleasanton, CA

54 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan Project Fee
Scope and Budget Considerations
The City's response to questions/answers references an available budget of $50,000-$80,000. Our proposed scope and fee provide a complete design process and deliverables for the master plan as outlined in the RFP.

Our experience shows that we cannot deliver that product for the stated budget. However, we believe we can deliver a high quality park master site plan process in a streamlined effort to meet this targeted budget, which would include the following:
• Site analysis
• Community engagement
• Two (2) concept plan alternatives
• One (1) preferred concept plan
• Two (2) public hearing - environmental review memo
• Project management and client meetings

Proposed Fees | Section 6 55
FEE
TYPE

1.1 Kick-off Meeting and Site Visit T&M/NTE $ 4,872

1.2 Review Documents and Provide Key Point Summary T&M/NTE $ 1,736 Task 1 Value: $ 6,608
FEE
TYPE

2.1 Site analysis exhibit and Needs Assessment summary T&M/NTE $ 8,376

2.2 Topographic Survey T&M/NTE $ 26,302
Task 2 Value: $ 34,678
FEE
TYPE

3.1 Community Engagement Strategy Summary T&M/NTE $ 1,830

3.2 Stakeholder Meetings T&M/NTE $ 1,908

3.3 Community Engagement Meetings (2) T&M/NTE $ 10,050

3.4 Online Surveys (2) T&M/NTE $ 9,256

3.5 Staff Meetings (2) T&M/NTE $ 3,304
Task 3 Value: $ 26,348
FEE
TYPE

4.1 Guiding Principles and Long-Term Vision T&M/NTE $ 954

4.2 Two Concept Plans and Correlating Planning-Level Cost Statements T&M/NTE $ 21,740

4.3 Third Concept Alternative and Correlating Planning-Level Cost Statement - Optional T&M/NTE $ 9,708

4.4 Staff Meetings (2) T&M/NTE $ 3,304

4.5 Preferred Concept Plan T&M/NTE $ 11,274

4.6 Phasing Plan Exhibit Including Cost Strategy T&M/NTE $ 5,338

4.7 Perspective Sketch Models (2) - Optional T&M/NTE $ 8,056 Task 4 Value: $ 60,374
FEE
TYPE

5.1 Summary Report (See Scope of Work for Components) T&M/NTE $ 18,700

5.2 Two Public Hearings T&M/NTE $ 6,608
Task 5 Value: $ 25,308
FEE
TYPE

6.1 Environmental Review Summary (CEQA Screening Memo) T&M/NTE $ 10,028 Task 6 Value: $ 10,028
FEE
TYPE

7.1 Project Management & Project Schedule T&M/NTE $ 8,680 Task 7 Value: $ 8,680
$ 154,260
$ 1,200
$ 155,460
Estimated Project Total with Optional Tasks $ 173,224
Task 1: Project Initiation and Background Review
Task 4: Vision,Concept Design, and Preferred Concept
Task 2: Site Inventory, Needs Assessment, & Topographic Survey Task 5: Master Plan Development
Task 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Task 7: Project Management
Subtotal without Optional Tasks
Estimated Project Total without Optional Tasks
(Third Concept Alternative and Estimate; Two Perspective Renderings) Reimbursable Expenses
Task 6: Environmental Review Memo
Skypark Master Plan Fee Schedule
January 9, 2026
Fee Footnotes
Estimated fees for tasks shown as “Time and Materials - Not to Exceed" (T&M/NTE) are provided for informational purposes only.

Amounts billed for these tasks, which will reflect actual hours, will not be exceeded without prior approval by the client.

Reimbursable Expenses
Incidental expenses incurred by RRM Design Group or any subconsultant it may hire to perform services for this project are reimbursed by the client at actual cost plus 10% to cover its overhead and administrative expenses.

Adjustment to Hourly Billing Rates
RRM reserves the right to adjust hourly rates on an annual basis.

57 7
Section Seven:

Proposed Project Schedule
Proposal for
Skypark Master Plan
Pictured:

Barney Schwartz Park
Paso Robles, CA

58 City of Scotts Valley | Proposal for Skypark Master Plan

RRM Design Group 59
Proposed Schedule
Project Initiation and Background Review
Site Inventory, Needs Assessment, & Topographic Survey
Community and Stakeholder Engagement
Vision, Concept Design and Preferred Concept
Master Plan Development Development
Environmental Review Memo
Project Management
Meeting Public Hearing Workshop Deliverables Duration
Task 7: Project Management
Task 1: Project Initiation and Background Review
Task 2: Site Inventory, Needs Assessment, & Topographic Survey Task 3: Community and Stakeholder Engagement
August September December
Task 6: Environmental Review Memo
Task 5: Master Plan Development
Skypark Master Plan
Project Schedule
January 9, 2026 March April May June July October November Task 4: Vision, Concept Design, and Preferred Concept

RESOLUTION NO. 2086

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCOTTS VALLEY

AUTHORIZING THE CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE SKYPARK MASTER PLAN TO

RRM DESIGN GROUP
WHEREAS, on October 31, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) from qualified consultants to develop a Skypark Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the City received seven (7) submittals from qualified design consultant firms within the deadline of January 9; and
WHEREAS, staff have reviewed the submittals to meet the criteria established; and WHEREAS, staff have chosen to award the contract to RRM Design Group; and WHEREAS, upon City Council approval, the City will execute a standard Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Scotts Valley that the Contract for the Skypark Master Plan be awarded to RRM Design Group.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group.

The above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Scotts Valley at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of May, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Approved:

Donna Lind, Mayor
Attest: ___________________________
Cathie Simonovich, City Clerk

AGENDA ITEM 3.

DATE: 5/6/2026
City of Scotts Valley

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: 5/6/2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Cathie Simonovich, City Clerk
APPROVED: Mali LaGoe, City Manager
SUBJECT: Ratify appointment of Scotts Valley Senior Center Advisory Commission Member

SUMMARY OF ISSUE
As vacancies occur, or due to the election or re-election of a Council Member, a member of the Council may nominate a new individual to serve on a City Commission, Committee, or Board.

All appointments must be ratified by the City Council.

There is a vacancy on the Senior Center Advisory Commission due to the resignation of Anna Pissanetzky and an application has been submitted by Genelle Chetcuti. Councilmember Derek Timm has nominated Ms. Chetcuti to serve on the Senior Center Advisory Commission.

Upon Council ratification, Ms. Chetcuti will fill the vacancy.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this appointment.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council ratify the appointment of Genelle Chetcuti to serve on the Senior Center Advisory Commission, effective May 6, 2026.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. G.Chetcuti Sr Center app 1-12-2026_Redacted

City of Scotts Valley
Application for Appointment to Serve on a City Advisory Body Advisory Body you are applying for:

Planning Commission Arts Commission Senior Center Board Parks & Recreation Commission Board of Appeals Code Enforcement Appeals Board ADA Accessibility Committee Parks & Recreation Advocates Mobile Home Park Rent Review Contact Information
Name
Street Address
City / ST/ ZIP Code
Phone – Primary □ Cell □ Work □ Home
Phone – Secondary □ Cell □ Work □ Home
E-Mail Address
Background Information*
Years residing in Scotts Valley
Employer
Occupation/Profession
Education
*If you are appointed to a city commission or board, you may be required to file a Statement of Economic Interests (FPPC Form 700). The Form 700 is a State-mandated public document disclosing certain business, property and investment holdings which might conflict with the member’s decisions. The City Clerk’s Office will supply the Form 700 upon appointment, if needed.

Summarize your interests, education, and/or experience as they relate to this position. ✔
13Self-employed
Entrepreneur - CEO/Founder BA from UCSC, Executive MBA from Santa Clara Univ.

I am interested in community and offering support to market senior center activities and expand membership in the center to younger seniors (age 50-65) who are more tech savvy. I have over 20 years of marketing and executive experience and was previously a COO to a mid-size company (180 employees). I am well-versed in finance, budgeting and marketing and would like to volunteer my assistance to make the senior center and all that it provides that much better.

I also believe that a great many 50-somethings don't necessarily identify as "senior". There could be something to re-branding the center to support the next generation of seniors - both in means of communication, types of classes, and special event content.

Genelle Chetcuti

SCOTTS VALLEY

AGENDA ITEM 4.

DATE: 5/6/2026
City of Scotts Valley

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: 5/6/2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:

APPROVED: Mali LaGoe, City Manager
SUBJECT:

Approval of Wastewater Recycling Facility Membrane Bioreactor Preliminary Design (Phase 2) Agreement in amount of $628,406.90

SUMMARY OF ISSUE
In 2022, the City retained Kennedy Jenks to prepare a Water Reclamation Options Study for the Wastewater Recycling Facility (WRF). Based on that analysis and subsequent technical evaluation, the City Council, at its March 2024 Strategic Planning Workshop, directed staff to proceed with Option 3C, which includes replacing the existing tertiary treatment system with a membrane bioreactor (MBR) package plant to improve reliability and meet recycled water demands.

To implement this option, the project was structured into a four-phase approach. In May 2024, the City Council approved an agreement with Kennedy Jenks to complete Phase 1:

Alternatives Analysis and Conceptual Design. Phase 1 has since been completed and resulted in the development of a conceptual design and supporting technical analysis confirming the feasibility of the proposed MBR system and establishing the foundation for the next stage of design.

Staff is now seeking authorization to proceed with Phase 2: Preliminary (30%) Design, which will further advance the project by refining design criteria, developing key system components, and preparing the project for subsequent final design and construction phases. Although Kennedy Jenks’ proposal includes additional phases of work, this request is limited to Phase 2 only. Phase 3 (final design and funding strategy) and Phase 4 (construction support and startup) are not included in this agreement and would be brought forward to the City Council for separate consideration at a future date.

To provide cost certainty, Kennedy Jenks has agreed to maintain its proposed Phase 3 pricing through completion of Phase 2 and for an additional 90-day period, thereafter, should the City elect to proceed. However, the City is under no obligation to authorize future phases.

FISCAL IMPACT
Phase 2 preliminary design services are estimated at $571,279, plus a 10% contingency of $57,127.90, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $628,406.90. Funding is available in Wastewater Capital Improvement Funds. There is no impact to the General Fund.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution No. 2091 authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $628,406.90 for Phase 2 (Preliminary Design) of the Wastewater Recycling Facility Membrane Bioreactor Project.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Resolution No. 2091_Approval of Design Services Agreement MBR Phase 2

2. ScottsValley_MBR_Design_Proposal_3.16.2026

3. Agreement MBR Design Phase 2_Kennedy Jenks

RESOLUTION NO. 2091

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCOTTS VALLEY

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR PHASE 2 (PRELIMINARY DESIGN) OF THE WASTEWATER RECYCLING FACILITY

MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$628,406.90
WHEREAS, in 2022, the City retained Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. to prepare a Water Reclamation Options Study for the Wastewater Recycling Facility (WRF); and WHEREAS, based on that analysis and subsequent technical evaluation, the City Council, at its March 2024 Strategic Planning Workshop, directed staff to proceed with Option 3C, which includes replacing the existing tertiary treatment system with a membrane bioreactor (MBR) package plant to improve reliability and meet recycled water demands; and
WHEREAS, the project was structured into a four-phase approach, and in May 2024, the City Council approved an agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. to complete Phase 1 (Alternatives Analysis and Conceptual Design); and WHEREAS, Phase 1 has been completed and established the conceptual design and technical foundation necessary to proceed to the next phase of work; and WHEREAS, the City now desires to proceed with Phase 2 (Preliminary 30% Design) to further develop the project and prepare for final design and construction; and WHEREAS, the proposed agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. includes a total not-to-exceed amount of $628,406.90, which includes a 10% contingency, and funding is available in the Wastewater Capital Improvement Funds; and WHEREAS, Phase 3 and Phase 4 services are not included in this agreement and would be subject to future City Council consideration and approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Scotts Valley that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. for Phase 2 (Preliminary Design) of the Wastewater Recycling Facility Membrane Bioreactor Project in an amount not to exceed $628,406.90.

The above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Scotts Valley at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of May 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Approved:

Donna Lind, Mayor
Attest: ___________________________
Cathie Simonovich, City Clerk

CITY OF SCOTTS VALLEY
Membrane Bioreactor(MBR) Package PlantDesign
City staff reached out to Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. (KJ) to provide a scope of work to provide design services to complete the design of a new Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) treatment facility to produce recycled water that complies with the agreement and regulatory requirements for serving Scotts Valley Water District recycled water and to alleviate treatment demands on the existing Water Reclamation Facility (WRF).

The proposed scope for the MBR design is planned in 4 phases as illustrated in Figure 1. Phase 1 for alternative analysis and conceptual design of the MBR plant to a 10% level was completed in May 2025.

This scope of work provides a detailed scope and fee estimate to perform Phase 2 MBR design package up to 30% design. A detailed scope will be prepared in the future as requested by the City for phases 3 and 4 to complete the MBR design, provide support to the City with bids, for engineering services during construction (ESDC), startup and commissioning support.

Figure 1. Flow Chart to Implement the Scotts Valley MBR Package Plant Design Phase 1:

Alternatives Analysis
& Conceptual Design
Define Design Criteria
MBR/UV Package
Plant Vendor Options
Conceptual Facilities
Siting
10% Design
Conceptual Cost
Estimate
Technical
Memorandum
Phase 2: Preliminary
Design
Package Plant
Vendor Pre-Selection
Field Investigations
(Survey / Geotech)
30% Design,
Specifications&
Costs
Preliminary Design
Report
Phase 3: Design &
Bid
60% Design,
Specifications and
Costs
90% Design,
Specifications, and
Costs
100% Design
Specifications, and
Costs
Bid Support Services
Phase 4: ESDC
Engineering Services
During Construction
Startup and
Commissioning
Support

Project Background
In 2024, the City approved a scope effort to complete Phase 1 of this project with an alternatives analysis for the selection of a location for the MBR package plant and to develop a 10% conceptual design for the MBR system. Kennedy Jenks developed a 10% design package and a technical memorandum for a parallel MBR and UV treatment facility that could treat 0.5 MGD with the option to expand to 0.75 MGD in the future, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Concept for MBR/UV Package Plant
The MBR/UV package plant would be supplied with raw wastewater from the WRF existing influent pump station, and the produced effluent will be sent to the existing WRF recycled water storage tank for distribution to Scotts Valley Water District. The wasted sludge will be processed at a solids holding tank and dewatering screw press system for disposal, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: General MBR/UV Package Treatment Process Flow Diagram

With the addition of a new split-stream treatment process, the existing tertiary treatment system will be decommissioned, and the operation of the existing secondary treatment process will return to its original design intent as a BOD/TSS removal treatment process.

During the Phase 1 alternatives evaluation three MBR vendors were evaluated and compared, and the City selected as preferred option a Kubota KSP6 MBR system with parallel treatment trains, each capable of treating 0.25 MGD. A Cloacina MBR package system was the second closest option for the MBR system, as shown in the alternatives ranking for the different vendor options in Table 1.

Table 1. Alternatives Ranking Matrix
Vendor Alternatives Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Cloacina Kubota Ovivo
Criteria Weight Range Score Weighted
Score Score Weighted Score Score Weighted Score
Customizability 10%
1 - 3

3.0 0.30 2.0 0.20 1.0 0.10
Constructability 25% 2.0 0.50 3.0 0.75 1.0 0.25
Expandability 10% 2.0 0.20 3.0 0.30 1.0 0.10
Ease of O&M 20% 2.0 0.40 3.0 0.60 2.0 0.40
Experience and
Support 10% 3.0 0.30 2.0 0.20 1.0 0.10
Capital Cost 25% 3.0 0.75 3.0 0.75 1.0 0.25
Total 100% 2.5 2.8 1.2
Rank 2 1 3
Different locations at the WRF were evaluated for the feasibility of installing the new MBR system, and the preferred location selected was the empty lot area east of the existing WRF Administration building.

A preliminary MBR site layout for the Kubota system is shown in Figure 4.

During Phase 2 of the project, Kennedy Jenks will support the City with preparing an RFP package for vendor selection for the MBR system and develop the 30% design package for the MBR system. Phase 3 is envisioned to begin once an MBR vendor is selected to collaborate with the vendor to integrate their MBR design into the overall design package for the MBR project completing the 60%, 90% and final design for the MBR system. Early procurement of the MBR system vendor will provide design, cost and schedule certainty. Phase 4 is envisioned to begin once a contractor is selected for the project, to provide engineering services during construction and support with startup and commissioning of the MBR system.

Project Team
The proposed project team is illustrated in the organization chart in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Project Organization Chart
Proposed Scope of Work
The proposed scope of work is to provide a full design for the MBR system, including design plans and specifications suitable for bid, as well as providing support for the City for early procurement of the MBR package system and bid support for the overall project and contractor selection.

The proposed scope of work, described herein, includes the following tasks:

Phase 2:
• Task 1 – Project Management and Coordination (Phase 2) • Task 2 – Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection
• Task 3 – Field Investigations
• Task 4 – 30% Design
• Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report

Phase 3:
• Task 6 – Project Management and Coordination (Phase 3) • Task 7 – 60% Design
• Task 8 – 90% Design
• Task 9 – Final Design
• Task 10 – Bid Support Services
• Task 11 – As Needed Support
Phase 2: Preliminary Design
Task 1 – Project Management and Coordination
KJ will develop and implement the appropriate management procedures and actions to facilitate timely and cost-effective delivery of quality service and deliverables to the City for the Project. This includes project administration related to schedule, budget, and scope management, management of subconsultants, and communication of project activities with the City for Phase 2 under this task.

Task 1.1 – Project Management
This task addresses the management and administrative responsibilities associated with schedule, budget control, monthly invoice preparation, and project closeout. This phase of the work assumes an 8- month duration with submittal of eight (8) monthly invoices.

Task 1.2 – Project Meetings
The following meetings are assumed during Phase 2:
• Phase 2 Kick-off Meeting – Discuss information needs and schedule for Phase 2. This meeting will be conducted virtually and is assumed to be 1 hr in duration. • Progress Meetings – Check in calls with the City to provide updates on progress to date and overall project status, align schedule and provide budget updates. • Project Internal meetings – internal calls with the KJ design team and experts for coordination as needed on the design deliverables.
• Concept and Criteria Review Meeting – KJ will conduct an in-house C&CR meeting early in the Project to obtain focused technical input from senior KJ staff based on their experience from other similar projects. This process is a component of KJ’s quality control process and allows for senior staff to provide technical review and input into the design aspects of the project. It helps address opportunities for improvements to the design and address potential future challenges in detailed design activities.

All meetings will be held via webinar with video and desktop sharing, using the Microsoft Office 365 Teams environment. Invitees for the progress meetings will include personnel from the City, the KJ Project Manager, and as needed technical staff. KJ will prepare and distribute meeting agendas, materials, and succinct notes to document discussions, action items, and decisions.

Task 1 Deliverables:
• Eight (8) monthly invoices and progress reports (PDF) • Meeting agendas and minutes (Word or PDF)

Task 1 Assumptions:
• KJ’s schedule and fee are based on providing Phase 2 services for a period of eight (8) months • Schedule will depend on the completion of the MBR vendor pre-procurement process and alignment with RFP release and evaluation time required by the City (discussed in Task 2) • Up to 2 progress meetings assumed with the City, 1 hr in duration, attended virtually.

Task 2 – Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection
This task includes providing the City support preparing a request for proposals from MBR package plant vendors to pre-select the MBR package plant to be used for the project design.

A request for proposal (RFP) document would be prepared, including the 10% design drawings developed under previous Phase 1 and equipment performance specifications developed under this task to be used by the vendors for their proposal package responses. KJ will provide the City support to prepare a RFP for the package plant vendor selection, provide the MBR package plant performance specifications, answer questions during the RFP phase, and provide support as needed for the evaluation of the vendor proposals.

Materials developed for the RFP will include:
• The City’s standard RFP documents modified for equipment pre-selection. • 10% design drawings.
• Equipment performance specifications.

Benefits of formal pre-selection include:
• Achieves competitive pricing and detailed technical information to develop the 60% Design. • Vendor proposals may include a pre-negotiated price and pre-negotiated escalation to protect the City from future price increases beyond the agreed upon escalation index. • Selection of the vendor is based on defined scoring criteria such as cost and non-cost scoring criteria (best value selection).
• Pre-selected vendor contract is assigned to the contractor to purchase and install the equipment.

Task 2 Deliverables:
• Package plant pre-selection materials: RFP language, MBR package plan specifications (Word, PDF)
• Tables comparing the vendor proposals, if applicable (Xcel, PDF) Task 2 Assumptions:
• The City will consolidate the RFP for the City to review and release. The City will manage the procurement process once a Vendor is selected.
• The completion of the 30% design and DBM scoped under Tasks 4 and 5 will not depend on selection of a vendor.
• Design details for the package plant will be provided in the 60% design (Phase 3).

Task 3 – Field Investigations
This task will include conducting field investigations to support the development of the 30% design drawings and specifications. KJ will subcontract with a Survey Subconsultant (TOWILL) to conduct a topographic survey of the project area and a Geotech Subconsultant (ENGEO) to perform geotechnical field investigations. Potholing is not included as part of this task. Refinement of the survey and geotechnical scope can be initiated once a preferred alternative layout is selected.

Task 3.1 – Site Survey
KJ will coordinate with TOWILL to provide surveying services and develop a topographic map for the project area defined by survey limits established based on the selected location for the package treatment system and connections to the existing WRF facility, based on the 10% design drawings completed in Phase 1. The topographic survey will include the following:
• Horizontal Datum and Grid Projection – North American Datum of NAD 83, California Coordinate System of 1986 (CCS83), Zone III, 2011 (2017.5) epoch
• Vertical datum – North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) Survey scope includes an optional task for utility marking to locate with GPR and/or electro detection of existing utilities if required. Additional details for this site survey scope are included in Appendix A.

Task 3.2 – Geotechnical
KJ will coordinate with ENGEO to provide geotechnical engineering and recommendations for the design and construction of project and prepare a Draft Geotechnical Design Report. KJ will review and provide comments on the Draft Geotechnical Design Report prepared by ENGEO. Following a round of review comments, ENGEO will submit their Geotechnical Design Report to KJ. Additional details for this geotechnical scope are included in Appendix B.

Task 3.3 – Site Visit
This task includes one in-person site visit, following the Phase 2 kick-off meeting to confirm the alignments, extent of the preferred conceptual layout alternative, and refine the initial survey and geotechnical scope of work as-needed.

Task 3 Deliverables:
• Topographic survey data and documentation from the surveying firm (CAD files). • Geotechnical data and report from the geotechnical firm (Word, PDF).

Task 3 Assumptions:
• The scope of work assumesfield investigations will be conducted for the package plant location as selected for the 10% Design plans developed under Task 4. • Four (4) KJ staff will attend the site visit following the Phase 2 Kick-off Meeting, specifically design leads for Process, Mechanical and Civil disciplines.
• Potholing is not included under this task. Based on the survey results if additional utility investigations are needed, KJ will work with the City to develop a scope and fee as needed.

The survey and geotechnical information will be integrated into the 30% Design and DBM, as appropriate.

Task 4 – 30% Design
Starting with the 10% Design documents prepared under Phase 1, KJ will develop the 30% Design drawings showing the area where the MBR package plant will connect. The details of the MBR package plant will be provided by the selected vendor and incorporated during the 60% design phase.

Specifications and updated Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) for the 30% design level will also be developed for this task.

Task 4.1 – 30% Design Drawings
This task includes the following activities:
• Develop and submit 30% Design drawings for City review. • Prepare a comments response log to collect 30% design comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 7 under the 60% design.

The 30% Design drawings will not include detailed vendor design drawings but will provide delineations for the MBR package system boundaries and show the interconnections between the WRF and the package system.

The MBR design is anticipated to include the following components including modifications to the WRF as follows (see Figure 4):
• Existing Influent pump station to be modified to include grit removal and updates to the existing pump station to convert 2 of the existing pumps to be able to pump raw wastewater influent into the MBR system.
• At the MBR package plant site, the raw wastewater will be screened using fine screens and equalized before being pumped into the MBR package system for treatment, followed by UV disinfection and transfer pumps that will convey the disinfected effluent to the existing recycled water storage wet well.
• The MBR package plant will include an odor control system, a building for housing the blowers and electrical equipment, chemical dosing system under a canopy, and a concrete pad where the MBR package system will be placed at.
• The MBR Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) will be pumped to a new sludge holding tank and screw press to be located at the WRF adjacent to the solids handling building.

A summary of the proposed drawing sheets to be prepared at 30%, 60%, 90% and final design is included in Appendix C.

Task 4.2 – 30% Specifications
KJ will prepare the 30% design level specifications for the main equipment for City review.

This task includes the following activities:
• Develop 30% design equipment specifications.
• Prepare a comments response log to collect 30% specification comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 7 under the 60% design.

A summary of the proposed specifications to be prepared at 30%, 60%, 90% and final design is included in Appendix D.

Task 4.3 – 30% Cost Estimate
This task includes preparation of the basis of estimate based on the 30% Design drawings for a Class 3 OPCC in accordance with AACE Cost classification level (see Table 2). The OPCC will include the cost for the MBR package plant based on the vendor proposal from Phase 1 and adjusted if feasible with input received from the vendors for the pre selection process during Task 2. Preliminary operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for the treatment facility will also be developed.

Table 2. Cost Estimate Classification Levels
This task includes the following activities:
• Prepare a Class 3 OPCC and O&M costs for the project, including MBR package plant costs based on the RFP responses and selected vendor from Task 2.
• Submit draft Class 3 OPCC for City review.
• Prepare a comments response log to collect Class 3 OPCC comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 7 under the 60% design.

Task 4.4 – 30% Design Workshop
This task includes conducting a 30% Design Workshop, a 2-hour to review the 30% Design and OPCC. KJ will develop a workshop agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and develop meeting minutes. Up to six (6) KJ staff will attend and the workshop.

Task 4 Deliverables:
• 30% Design drawings (PDF)
• 30% Design specifications (Word)
• OPCC (Class 3), O&M costs based on 30% Design documents (Xcel, PDF) • 30% Design Review Comments log (Xcel, PDF)
• 30% Design Workshop agenda, materials, and meeting notes (PDF) Task 4 Assumptions:
• Drawings to be prepared for the 30% design are summarized in Appendix C

• Specifications to be prepared for the 30% design are summarized in Appendix D • Cost Estimate will be prepared to Class 3 level
• Design workshop will be conducted virtually and be 2 hours in duration • Upon vendor selection, MBR package drawings would be provided for the Phase 3 60% design, which is not part of this Phase 2 scope of work.

Task 5 – Design Basis Memorandum (DBM)
A succinct Draft DBM will summarize the design criteria for the 30% design and design considerations for the project.

Task 5.1 – Draft DBM
The Draft DBM will include design criteria, 30% Drawings, and Class 3 OPCC for the preferred package plant location identified in Phase 1.

The DBM will document and include code review for the package plant and ancillary project elements in compliance with:
• California Building Code (CBC), current edition
• California Plumbing Code (CPC), current edition
• California Fire Code (CFC), current edition
• California Mechanical Code (CMC), current edition
• National Electrical Code (NEC), current edition
• NFPA 820: Standards for fire [protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities • Cal-OSHA
• State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Construction General permit (CGP) • California Air Resources Control Board (CARB, if needed) • Other local ordinances
Task 5.2 – Final DBM
A Final DBM will be prepared based on the comments received from the City on the Draft DBM.

Task 5 Deliverables:
• Draft DBM (Word, PDF)
• Final DBM (Word, PDF)
Task 5 Assumptions:
• City will provide one set of consolidated comments in track changes/embedded comments in the Word document within three (3) weeks of the Draft DBM submittal. • KJ will discuss refinements to the process design criteria with City and WRF staff during the monthly progress meetings.

Phase 3: Design and Bid
Task 6 – Project Management and Coordination
KJ will provide project administration related to schedule, budget, and scope management, management of subconsultants, and communication of project activities with the City for Phase 3 under this task.

Task 6.1 – Project Management
This task addresses the management and administrative responsibilities associated with schedule, budget control, monthly invoice preparation, and project closeout. This phase of the work assumes a 12- month duration with submittal of twelve (12) monthly invoices.

Task 6.2 – Project Meetings
The following meetings are assumed during Phase 3:
• Phase 2 Kick-off Meeting – Discuss information needs and schedule for Phase 3. This meeting will be conducted virtually and is assumed to be 1 hr in duration. • Progress Meetings – Regular check in calls with the City to provide updates on progress to date and overall project status, align schedule and provide budget updates. • Project Internal meetings – internal calls with KJ design team and experts for coordination as needed on the design deliverables.

All meetings will be held via webinar with video and desktop sharing, using the Microsoft Office 365 Teams environment. Invitees for the progress meetings will include personnel from the City, the KJ Project Manager, and as needed technical staff. KJ will prepare and distribute meeting agendas, materials, and succinct notes to document discussions, action items, and decisions.

Task 6 Deliverables:
• Twelve (12) monthly invoices and progress reports (PDF) • Meeting agendas and minutes (Word or PDF)
Task 6 Assumptions:
• KJ’s schedule and fee are based on providing Phase 3 services for a period of Twelve (12) months • Up to 3 progress meetings assumed with the City, 1 hr in duration, attended virtually.

Task 7 – 60% Design
Starting with the 30% Design documents prepared under Phase 2, KJ will develop the 60% Design drawings and incorporate the details of the MBR package plant provided by the selected vendor.

Specifications and updated Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) for the 60% design level will also be developed for this task.

Task 7.1 – 60% Design Drawings
This task includes the following activities:
• Develop and submit 60% Design drawings for City review.

• Prepare a comments response log to collect 60% design comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 8 under the 90% design.

The 60% Design drawings will include detailed vendor design drawings.

Task 7.2 – 60% Specifications
KJ will prepare the 60% design level specifications for the main equipment. Division 0 specs will follow City standards.

This task includes the following activities:
• Develop 60% design equipment specifications.
• Prepare a comments response log to collect 60% specification comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 8 under the 90% design.

Task 7.3 – 60% Cost Estimate
This task includes updating the cost estimate for the 60% Design drawings to a Class 3 OPCC based on AACE Cost classification level (see Table 2). The OPCC will include refined cost for the MBR package plant as provided by the selected vendor. O&M costs for the treatment facility will also be updated.

This task includes the following activities:
• Prepare a Class 3 OPCC and O&M costs for the project
• Submit draft Class 3 OPCC for City review.
• Prepare a comments response log for addressing Class 3 OPCC, to be incorporated in task 8 under the 90% design
Task 7.4 – 60% Design Workshop
This task includes conducting a 60% Design Workshop, a 2-hour to review the 60% Design and OPCC. KJ will develop a workshop agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and develop meeting minutes. Up to six (6) KJ staff will attend and the workshop.

Task 7 Deliverables:
• 60% Design drawings (PDF)
• 60% Design specifications (Word)
• OPCC (Class 3), O&M costs (Xcel, PDF)
• 60% Design Review Comments log (Xcel, PDF)
• 60% Design Workshop agenda, materials, and meeting notes (PDF) Task 7 Assumptions:
• Drawings to be prepared for the 60% design are summarized in Appendix C • Specifications to be prepared for the 60% design are summarized in Appendix D • Cost Estimate will be prepared to Class 3 level
• Design workshop will be conducted virtually and be 2 hours in duration

Task 8 – 90% Design
KJ will develop the 90% Design drawings, specifications and updated OPCC including comments resolution from the 60% design.

Task 8.1 – 90% Design Drawings
This task includes the following activities:
• Develop and submit 90% Design drawings for City review. • Prepare a comments response log to collect 90% design comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 9 under the 100% design.

The 90% Design drawings will include updated vendor design drawings.

Task 8.2 – 90% Specifications
KJ will prepare the 90% design level specifications for the main equipment. Division 0 specs will follow City standards.

This task includes the following activities:
• Develop 90% design equipment specifications.
• Prepare a comments response log to collect 90% specification comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 9 under the 100% design.

Task 8.3 – 90% Cost Estimate
This task includes updating the cost estimate based on the 90% Design drawings to a Class 2 OPCC based on AACE Cost classification level (see Table 2). The OPCC will include refined cost for the MBR package plant as provided by the selected vendor. O&M costs for the treatment facility will also be updated.

This task includes the following activities:
• Prepare a Class 2 OPCC and O&M costs for the project
• Submit draft Class 2 OPCC for City review.
• Prepare a comments response log for addressing Class 2 OPCC, to be incorporated in task 9 under the final design
Task 8.4 – 90% Design Workshop
This task includes conducting a 90% Design Workshop, a 2-hour to review the 90% Design and OPCC. KJ will develop a workshop agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and develop meeting minutes. Up to six (6) KJ staff will attend and the workshop.

Task 8 Deliverables:
• 90% Design drawings (PDF)
• 90% Design specifications (Word)
• OPCC (Class 2), O&M costs (Xcel, PDF)
• 90% Design Review Comments log (Xcel, PDF)
• 90% Design Workshop agenda, materials, and meeting notes (PDF)

Task 8 Assumptions:
• Drawings to be prepared for the 90% design are summarized in Appendix C • Specifications to be prepared for the 90% design are summarized in Appendix D • Cost Estimate will be prepared to Class 2 level
• Design workshop will be conducted virtually and be 2 hours in duration Task 9 – Final Design
KJ will develop the Final Design drawings, specifications and updated OPCC including comments resolution from the 90% design.

Task 9.1 – 100% Design Drawings
This task includes the following activities:
• Develop and submit 100% Design drawings for City review. • Review comments from the City and incorporate into FINAL stamped and signed design drawings.

The 100% Design drawings will include the final vendor design drawings.

Task 9.2 – 100% Specifications
KJ will prepare the 100% design level specifications for the project.

This task includes the following activities:
• Develop 100% design specifications and submit for City review. • Review comments from the City and incorporate into FINAL stamped and signed design specifications.

Task 9.3 – 100% Cost Estimate
This task includes refining the cost estimate based on the Final Design drawings at a Class 2 OPCC based on AACE Cost classification level (see Table 2). The OPCC will include the final cost for the MBR package plant as provided by the selected vendor. O&M costs for the treatment facility will also be updated.

This task includes the following activities:
• Update Class 2 OPCC and O&M costs for the project
• Submit final Class 2 OPCC cost.

Task 9.4 – 100% Design Workshop
This task includes conducting a 100% Design Workshop, a 2-hour to review the Final Design and OPCC.

KJ will develop a workshop agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and develop meeting minutes. Up to six (6) KJ staff will attend and the workshop.

Task 9 Deliverables:
• 100% Final Design drawings (PDF, CAD)
• 100% Final Design specifications (Word, PDF)
• Final OPCC (Class 2), O&M costs (Xcel, PDF)
• 100% Design Workshop agenda, materials, and meeting notes (PDF)

Task 9 Assumptions:
• Drawings to be prepared for the 100% design are summarized in Appendix C • Specifications to be prepared for the 100% design are summarized in Appendix D • Cost Estimate will be Class 2 level
• Design workshop will be conducted virtually and be 2 hours in duration Task 10 – Bid Support Services
KJ will provide support for the City for the project Bid, preparing conformed documents and providing responses to RFIs.

Task 10.1 – Conformed Drawings and Specifications
This task includes preparing and submit Conformed drawings and specifications Task 10.2 – Bid Site Walk
This task assumes attendance by the Project Manager and Design Manager during the Bid site walk to support Bidders with answering questions.

Task 10.3 – RFI Responses
This task assumes an allowance of 60 hours for the project design team to prepare addenda based on received RFIs and responses agreed upon with the City.

Task 10.4 – Bid Support
This task assumes an allowance of 14 hours for the project team to support the City with evaluation of the proposals and comparison of Bid results
Task 10 Deliverables:
• Conformed drawings and specifications (PDF)
• RFI responses (Word, PDF)
Task 10 Assumptions:
• An allowance of 60 hours is assumed to support the City with RFI responses and addenda • Attendance to 1 bid site walk by up to 2 KJ staff
• An allowance of 14 hours is assumed for the project team to support the City with Bid review Task 11 – As needed support
This task assumes an allowance of $40,000 for any additional services provided by KJ as requested and approved by the City. Additional services can include:
• Additional project meetings or design review workshops • Additional site visits or investigations required for the design development • Changes to design assumptions or scope that require additional design drawings, specifications or modifications to the Preliminary Design Report
• Additional coordination required by the City for the Vendor procurement and selection process • Additional support required by the City for the Bid and award process • Extended project schedule and duration

This task also includes an allowance for an optional task for surveyor for utility marking to locate with GPR and/or electro detection of existing utilities if required.

Proposed Schedule
This proposal assumes the scope of services for Phase 2 will be completed in 8 months from receipt of the Notice to Proceed and services for Phase 3 will be complete in 12 months from initiation of Phase 3 activities. A potential project schedule is shown in Figure 6. Adhering to the anticipated notice to proceed date, meeting dates, and review times will be critical to achieving the design schedule presented below.

Figure 6. Anticipated Design Schedule Phase 2 and Phase 3 SVWD WWTP Master Plan Schedule
Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Notice to Proceed Phase 2 
Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination

1.1 - Project Management

1.2 - Project Meetings Kickoff / /
Task 2 - Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection

2.1 - MBR Preselection
Task 3 - Field Investigations

3.1 - Site Survey ✓

3.2 - Geotechnical Study u ✓

3.3 - Site Visit ●
Task 4 - 30% Design

4.1 - 30% Design Drawings u

4.2 - 30% Specifications u

4.3 - 30% Cost Estimate u

4.4 - 30% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) W#1
Task 5 - Design Basis Memorandum

5.1 - DRAFT Report u

5.2 -Final Report ✓
Notice to Proceed Phase 3 
Task 6 - Project Management and Coordination

6.1 - Project Management

6.2 - Project Meetings Kickoff / / /
Task 7 - 60% Design

7.1 - 60% Design Drawings u

7.2 - 60% Specifications u

7.3 - 60% Cost Estimate u

7.4 - 60% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) W#2
Task 8 - 90% Design

8.1 - 90% Design Drawings u

8.2 - 90% Specifications u

8.3 - 90% Cost Estimate u

8.4 - 90% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) W#3
Task 9 - Final Design

9.1 - 100% Design Drawings u ✓

9.2 - 100% Specifications u ✓

9.3 - 100% Cost Estimate u ✓

9.4 - 100% Design Workshop (1 hr, virtual) W#4
Task 10 - Bid Support Services

10.1 - Conformed Drawings & Specifications ✓

10.2 - Bid Site Walk ✓

10.3 - RFI Responses

10.4 - Bid Support ✓
Task 11 - As Needed Support
Total Project
Meetings Deliverables
Workshops W# Draft u
Progress Meetings / Final ✓
Site Visit ●
Phase 3
2027
~ 20 months
City of Scotts Valley WWTP Master Plan
LEGEND
Phase 2
2026 2026

Proposed Fee
The proposed fee is summarized in Table 3, with a detailed breakdown of Phase 2 and 3 hours by subtask provided in Table 4.

Table 3. Proposed Fee Summary
Project Tasks Total
Hours
Total KJ Labor Total Subs Total
Expenses
Total Labor +
Subs + Expenses
Phase 2
Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination 180 $ 49,645 $ - $ - $ 49,645 Task 2 - Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection 90 $ 24,860 $ - $ - $ 24,860 Task 3 - Field Investigations 60 $ 16,840 $ 114,294 $ 1,375 $ 132,509 Task 4 - 30% Design 1230 $ 312,855 $ - $ - $ 312,855
Task 5 - Design Basis Memorandum 200 $ 51,410 $ - $ - $ 51,410 Total Phase 2 ( Tasks 1 - 5) 1760 $ 455,610 $ 114,294 $ 1,375 $ 571,279 Phase 3
Task 6 - Project Management and Coordination 320 $ 89,085 $ - $ - $ 89,085 Task 7 - 60% Design 2690 $ 689,340 $ - $ - $ 689,340
Task 8 - 90% Design 2600 $ 685,264 $ - $ - $ 685,264
Task 9 - Final Design 770 $ 202,704 $ - $ - $ 202,704
Task 10 - Bid Support Services 130 $ 35,638 $ - $ 275 $ 35,913 Task 11 - As Needed Support 0 $ 40,000 $ 16,500 $ - $ 56,500 Total Phase 3 (Tasks 6 to 11) 6510 $ 1,742,031 $ 16,500 $ 275 $ 1,758,806 Total Phase 2 & 3 (tasks 1 to 11) 8270 $ 2,197,641 $ 130,794 $ 1,650 $ 2,330,086 Page 107 of 570 Table 4. Detailed Phase 2 and 3 Fee Estimate
Exhibit A: Proposal Fee Estimate
CLIENT Name:

PROJECT Description: MBR Design (Complete Design)
Proposal/Job Number: Date: 3/16/2026
January 1, 2025 Rates QA/QC QA/QC Design manager QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC PM Tech lead Tech lead Tech lead Cost Tech lead Tech lead Tech lead I&C Elec Process Civil CAD CAD CAD CAD CAD KJ KJ Sub Sub KJ KJ KJ Total Labor + Subs + Expenses City of Scotts Valley
Classification: Eng-Sci-8 Don Ervin (Civil) Eng-Sci-8 David S (Process) Eng-Sci-8 Byron N (Process) Eng-Sci-8 Sanki N (I&C) Eng-Sci-8 Zach D (Electrical) Eng-Sci-8 PJ (structural) Eng-Sci-7 Zach Harris (bldg ) Eng-Sci-7 Mark P (Architect) Eng-Sci-6 Claudia L Eng-Sci-7 Jeremiah M (Process/Mech) Eng-Sci-6 Brittany Mahoney (Architect) Eng-Sci-6 Andrew Gudal (I&C) Eng-Sci-6 Kieran (Cost) Eng-Sci-5 Jon M (Electrical) Eng-Sci-6 Patrick Tran (Civil) Eng-Sci-5 Faiyaz (Structural) Eng-Sci-4 Ricardo Mejia (I&C) Eng-Sci-3 Vitaliy Z (electrical) Eng-Sci-3 Drajhan (Process) Eng-Sci-2 Jodi (bldg/Civil) Eng-Sci-2 Nicholas Santamaria (I&C) Sr CAD- Designer CAD- Designer Sr CAD- Technician CAD- Technician Project Assistant Total Labor Escalation Survey Geotech Sub-Markup ODCs ODCs Markup Total Labor Total Subs Total Expenses Total Labor + Subs + Expenses Total Labor Total Subs Total Expenses Hourly Rate: $340 $340 $340 $340 $340 $340 $315 $315 $290 $315 $290 $290 $290 $270 $290 $270 $250 $230 $230 $200 $200 $210 $200 $195 $180 $145 Hours Fees 3% Fees Fees 10% Fees 10% Fees $0 $0 $0
Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination

1.1 - Project Management
Project Setup, Work plan, Closeout, H&S plan 4 4 4 12 $3,100 $0 $0 $3,100 $0 $0 $3,100 Monthly Reports and Invoicing (8 months, monthtly) 16 8 24 $5,800 $0 $0 $5,800 $0 $0 $5,800

1.2 - Project Meetings
Kickoff Meeting (1hr, virtual) 1 2 2 2 7 $2,060 $0 $0 $2,060 $0 $0 $2,060 Progress Meetings (up tp 2, 1 hr duration, virtual) 2 2 $580 $0 $0 $580 $0 $0 $580 Project Internal Meetings (biweekly, 1hr, virtual) 4 4 16 2 2 2 2 2 16 8 2 6 6 6 6 8 8 16 8 124 $35,040 $0 $0 $35,040 $0 $0 $35,040 C&CR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 11 $3,065 $0 $0 $3,065 $0 $0 $3,065 Task 1 - Subtotal 6 5 23 2 2 2 2 2 41 9 2 7 0 6 7 6 8 9 19 10 0 0 0 0 0 12 180 $49,645 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,645 $0 $0 $49,645 Task 2 - Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection

2.1 - MBR Preselection
Prepare RFP 2 8 8 4 16 2 40 $10,950 $0 $0 $10,950 $0 $0 $10,950 Prepare MBR vendor specifications 2 8 2 2 4 4 4 12 2 40 $11,050 $0 $0 $11,050 $0 $0 $11,050 Review RFIs and support City with vendor selection 4 2 4 10 $2,860 $0 $0 $2,860 $0 $0 $2,860 Task 2 - Subtotal 2 2 20 2 0 0 0 0 12 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 90 $24,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,860 $0 $0 $24,860 Task 3 - Field Investigations

3.1 - Site Survey 1 8 8 17 $4,170 $33,904 $3,390 $0 $4,170 $37,294 $0 $41,464

3.2 - Geotechnical Study 4 1 6 11 $3,270 $70,000 $7,000 $0 $3,270 $77,000 $0 $80,270

3.3 - Site Visit 8 8 8 8 32 $9,400 $0 $1,250 $125 $9,400 $0 $1,375 $10,775 Task 3 - Subtotal 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 16 6 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 60 $16,840 $0 $33,904 $70,000 $10,390 $1,250 $125 $16,840 $114,294 $1,375 $132,509 Task 4 - 30% Design

4.1 - 30% Design Drawings 43 7 54 17 15 7 15 6 8 81 20 17 0 65 17 48 50 119 122 44 70 49 56 144 1074 $269,540 $0 $0 $269,540 $0 $0 $269,540

4.2 - 30% Specifications 2 6 2 1 1 4 2 9 2 5 3 2 1 13 3 16 4 76 $20,695 $0 $0 $20,695 $0 $0 $20,695

4.3 - 30% Cost Estimate 4 4 40 6 54 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500

4.4 - 30% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) 4 4 4 4 6 4 26 $7,120 $0 $0 $7,120 $0 $0 $7,120 Task 4 - Subtotal 45 7 68 19 16 8 19 8 16 94 22 26 40 68 19 49 63 122 150 48 70 49 56 144 0 4 1230 $312,855 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $312,855 $0 $0 $312,855 Task 5 - Design Basis Memorandum

5.1 - DRAFT Report 6 8 2 2 4 4 2 8 16 4 6 4 6 6 8 8 36 36 4 170 $43,970 $0 $0 $43,970 $0 $0 $43,970

5.2 -Final Report 2 4 2 4 6 8 4 30 $7,440 $0 $0 $7,440 $0 $0 $7,440 Task 5 - Subtotal 8 0 12 2 2 4 4 2 10 20 4 6 0 4 6 6 8 8 42 44 0 0 0 0 0 8 200 $51,410 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,410 $0 $0 $51,410 Total Phase 2 ( Tasks 1 - 5) 61 14 131 25 20 18 25 12 81 139 28 43 40 78 48 67 79 143 251 102 70 49 56 152 0 28 1760 $ 455,610 $ - $ 33,904 $ 70,000 $ 10,390 $1,250 $125 $ 455,610 $ 114,294 $ 1,375 $ 571,279 Page 108 of 570 Exhibit A: Proposal Fee Estimate
CLIENT Name:

PROJECT Description: MBR Design (Complete Design)
Proposal/Job Number: Date: 3/16/2026
January 1, 2025 Rates QA/QC QA/QC Design manager QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC PM Tech lead Tech lead Tech lead Cost Tech lead Tech lead Tech lead I&C Elec Process Civil CAD CAD CAD CAD CAD KJ KJ Sub Sub KJ KJ KJ Total Labor + Subs + Expenses City of Scotts Valley
Classification: Eng-Sci-8 Don Ervin (Civil) Eng-Sci-8 David S (Process) Eng-Sci-8 Byron N (Process) Eng-Sci-8 Sanki N (I&C) Eng-Sci-8 Zach D (Electrical) Eng-Sci-8 PJ (structural) Eng-Sci-7 Zach Harris (bldg ) Eng-Sci-7 Mark P (Architect) Eng-Sci-6 Claudia L Eng-Sci-7 Jeremiah M (Process/Mech) Eng-Sci-6 Brittany Mahoney (Architect) Eng-Sci-6 Andrew Gudal (I&C) Eng-Sci-6 Kieran (Cost) Eng-Sci-5 Jon M (Electrical) Eng-Sci-6 Patrick Tran (Civil) Eng-Sci-5 Faiyaz (Structural) Eng-Sci-4 Ricardo Mejia (I&C) Eng-Sci-3 Vitaliy Z (electrical) Eng-Sci-3 Drajhan (Process) Eng-Sci-2 Jodi (bldg/Civil) Eng-Sci-2 Nicholas Santamaria (I&C) Sr CAD- Designer CAD- Designer Sr CAD- Technician CAD- Technician Project Assistant Total Labor Escalation Survey Geotech Sub-Markup ODCs ODCs Markup Total Labor Total Subs Total Expenses Total Labor + Subs + Expenses Total Labor Total Subs Total Expenses Hourly Rate: $340 $340 $340 $340 $340 $340 $315 $315 $290 $315 $290 $290 $290 $270 $290 $270 $250 $230 $230 $200 $200 $210 $200 $195 $180 $145 Hours Fees 3% Fees Fees 10% Fees 10% Fees $0 $0 $0
Task 6 - Project Management and Coordination

6.1 - Project Management
Project Setup, Work plan, Closeout, H&S plan 4 4 4 12 $3,100 $0 $0 $3,100 $0 $0 $3,100 Monthly Reports and Invoicing (12 months, monthtly) 24 12 36 $8,700 $0 $0 $8,700 $0 $0 $8,700

6.2 - Project Meetings
Kickoff Meeting (1hr, virtual) 1 2 2 1 2 1 9 $2,575 $0 $0 $2,575 $0 $0 $2,575 Progress Meetings (up tp 3, 1hr, virtual) 3 3 $870 $0 $0 $870 $0 $0 $870 Project Internal Meetings (biweekly, 1hr, virtual) 12 24 8 8 8 8 8 24 24 12 12 4 8 12 12 12 12 24 16 12 260 $73,840 $0 $0 $73,840 $0 $0 $73,840 Task 6 - Subtotal 13 0 30 8 8 8 8 8 57 25 12 12 4 8 12 12 12 12 26 17 12 0 0 0 0 16 320 $89,085 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,085 $0 $0 $89,085 Task 7 - 60% Design

7.1 - 60% Design Drawings 75 12 95 29 27 13 27 10 6 141 35 30 114 30 84 88 208 214 77 123 86 98 252 1874 $470,020 $0 $0 $470,020 $0 $0 $470,020

7.2 - 60% Specifications 18 50 21 5 7 34 14 80 20 46 26 20 12 110 21 148 98 6 736 $196,700 $0 $0 $196,700 $0 $0 $196,700

7.3 - 60% Cost Estimate 4 4 40 6 54 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500

7.4 - 60% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) 4 4 4 4 6 4 26 $7,120 $0 $0 $7,120 $0 $0 $7,120 Task 7 - Subtotal 93 12 153 50 32 20 61 24 14 225 55 80 40 140 50 96 198 229 374 179 123 86 98 252 0 6 2690 $689,340 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $689,340 $0 $0 $689,340 Task 8 - 90% Design

8.1 - 90% Design Drawings 75 12 95 29 27 13 27 10 8 141 35 30 114 30 84 88 208 214 77 123 86 98 252 1876 $470,600 $14,118 $0 $0 $484,718 $0 $0 $484,718

8.2 - 90% Specifications 16 45 18 5 6 30 12 71 18 41 23 18 10 100 21 131 83 6 654 $174,865 $5,246 $0 $0 $180,111 $0 $0 $180,111

8.3 - 90% Cost Estimate 4 4 32 4 44 $12,720 $382 $0 $0 $13,102 $0 $0 $13,102

8.4 - 90% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) 4 4 4 4 6 4 26 $7,120 $214 $0 $0 $7,334 $0 $0 $7,334 Task 8 - Subtotal 91 12 148 47 32 19 57 22 16 216 53 75 32 137 48 94 188 229 355 164 123 86 98 252 0 6 2600 $665,305 $19,959 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $685,264 $0 $0 $685,264 Task 9 - Final Design

9.1 - 100% Design Drawings 21 4 27 8 8 4 8 3 4 40 10 9 0 33 9 24 25 60 60 22 35 25 28 72 0 0 539 $135,355 $4,061 $0 $0 $139,416 $0 $0 $139,416

9.2 - 100% Specifications 4 0 11 5 1 2 8 3 0 18 5 10 0 6 4 3 25 5 33 22 0 0 0 0 0 8 173 $45,445 $1,363 $0 $0 $46,808 $0 $0 $46,808

9.3 - 100% Cost Estimate 4 4 16 4 4 32 $8,880 $266 $0 $0 $9,146 $0 $0 $9,146

9.4 - 100% Design Workshop (1 hr, virtual) 4 4 4 4 6 4 26 $7,120 $214 $0 $0 $7,334 $0 $0 $7,334 Task 9 - Subtotal 25 4 46 13 9 6 16 6 12 62 15 23 16 39 13 27 50 65 103 52 35 25 28 72 0 8 770 $196,800 $5,904 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $202,704 $0 $0 $202,704 Task 10 - Bid Support Services

10.1 - Conformed Drawings & Specifications 4 4 8 16 8 40 $10,320 $310 $0 $0 $10,630 $0 $0 $10,630

10.2 - Bid Site Walk 8 8 16 $5,040 $151 $0 $250 $25 $5,191 $0 $275 $5,466

10.3 - RFI Responses 8 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 6 8 8 60 $15,340 $460 $0 $0 $15,800 $0 $0 $15,800

10.4 - Bid Support 4 4 6 14 $3,900 $117 $0 $0 $4,017 $0 $0 $4,017 Task 10 - Subtotal 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 18 16 0 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 30 6 0 8 16 0 0 0 130 $34,600 $1,038 $0 $0 $0 $250 $25 $35,638 $0 $275 $35,913 Task 11 - As Needed Support

11.1 - As needed services 0 $40,000 $15,000 $1,500 $0 $40,000 $16,500 $0 $56,500 Task 10 - Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $40,000 $0 $15,000 $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $40,000 $16,500 $0 $56,500 hidden line - task groups end
Total Phase 3 (Tasks 6 to 11) 222 28 401 118 81 53 142 60 117 544 135 192 92 326 125 231 450 537 888 418 293 205 240 576 0 36 6510 $ 1,715,130 $ 26,901 $ 15,000 $ - $ 1,500 $ 250 $ 25 $ 1,742,031 $ 16,500 $ 275 $1,758,806 Total Phase 2 & 3 (Tasks 16 to 11) 283 42 532 143 101 71 167 72 198 683 163 235 132 404 173 298 529 680 1139 520 363 254 296 728 0 64 8270 $ 2,170,740 $ 26,901 $ 48,904 $ 70,000 $ 11,890 $1,500 $150 $ 2,197,641 $ 130,794 $ 1,650 $2,330,086 Page 109 of 570 Appendix A
Site Survey Proposal

Towill, Inc. ● 2300 Clayton Road ● Suite 1200 ● Concord ● California ● 94520-2176 ● 925.682.6976 ● 925.682.6390 fax www.towill.com
January 26, 2026 (Rev 1/30/2026)
Claudia Llerandi, PE
Kennedy Jenks
2121 N. California Blvd, STE 810
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Direct: (415) 243.2506
[email protected]
Re: Survey Support Services
Scotts Valley Wastewater treatment site, 700 Lundy Lane, Scotts Valley, CA, Dear Ms Llerandi,
Thank you for choosing Towill, Inc. to compile and submit the proposal for Survey Support services. In the following sections, we outline our comprehensive understanding of the project, present the proposed scope of work, and provide an estimate for the associated costs.

THE PROJECT
The project involves survey support for the topographic surveys at the location, as indicated in Exhibit A, located in Scotts Valley, CA.

SCOPE OF SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES
Task One—Survey Support for Scotts Valley WWTP

1.1General
Towill will provide the following services:
• Coordinate with Kennedy Jenks for the duration of the project, see anticipated schedule below.
• Provide land surveying services, which shall be dated, signed, and sealed by a professional surveyor (John T. May, PLS) in accordance with prime contract/scope requirements.
• Establish or tie-in to project control network.
o Horizontal Datum and Grid Projection – North American Datum of NAD 83 (NAD83), California Coordinate System of 1983 (CCS83), Zone III, 2011 (2017.5) epoch
o Vertical Datum – North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88)

1.2 Topographic Survey
Towill will conduct a field survey to collect topographic data to support design at the waste water treatment plant. Collected features will be visible (at the time of our field survey) • Hardscape and softscape including gradebreaks, high points, and low points • Identify material of hardscape and softscape
• Sanitary and storm surface features including, but not limited to manholes, catch basins, cleanouts, culverts, and headwalls.

• Provide rim and grate elevations, pipe inverts, size, and material. Locate the next manhole or catch basin up or down stream of storm or sanitary sewer pipes extending beyond the survey/property line such that pipe slope can be determined. • Surface features such as valves, meters, boxes, vaults, fire hydrants, utility appurtenances, point of connections, and outfalls.
• Overhead electrical lines, including approximate height of lines, and guy wires. • Fencing, gates, barriers, signs, bollards (permanent, and removable), signs, light poles, driveways, striping, wheel stops, and trees (size, species, and drip lines). • Buildings, walls, structures, and equipment pads including finished floor elevations, doors, ramps, extent of awnings or overhangs, if applicable, bottom and top of wall, and top of equipment pad(s).

Optional Task:

Utility Marking company to locate with GPR and/or electro detection of existing underground utilities, mark on ground with paint or flags indicated type and depth. Towill will collect this data and incorporate into topographic deliverables.

Task One Deliverables
• ACAD Civil 3D file (2022 Version), with surface
• Control Report
• Pdf of topographic basemap (sheets)
• Dipsheets of Sanitary/Storm Drainage Structures
• Site Photos
• ASCII file (Point numbers, northing, easting, elevation and description)

SCHEDULE
Topographic surveys can be conducted with weeks of 2 NTP and final deliverables within 3 weeks of successful completion and collection of the field data.

ASSUMPTIONS, SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS
Any work above and beyond the described scope above will be negotiated separately and billed on a time-and-materials basis per Towill’s contract rate schedule. For clarification, our proposed technical approach assumes the following:
• Access to the site and notification of entry will be provided by others. • Services other than those specifically described herein are not currently proposed. • Our proposal does not include payment of any fees, permits, or other items not specifically mentioned in our scope of work. Such fees, if applicable, will be invoiced as additional costs.
• No encroachment permits are anticipated for this effort. • No traffic control is anticipated for this effort.
• Travel time is included in this estimate.
• Weekends, and overtime are included in this estimate. • Night and Holidays are not included in this estimate. • No staking of right-of-way, easements, or boundaries is included in this estimate.

• Towill will receive all digital files in a timely manner to keep the project on track. If additional information is needed to complete a task Towill will notify Kennedy Jenks immediately.
• Additional time spent gathering necessary information needed to complete a task will be bill at a time and materials basis per contract rate. • The Scope of Services outlined in this proposal are based on facts known at the time of submission, including, if applicable, information supplied by the Client. For some projects, the scope and level of required effort may not be fully definable during the initial phases. As the project progresses, facts discovered may indicate that the scope must be redefined. Towill will promptly provide Client with an amendment to this proposal/agreement to recognize such changes, which shall be deemed approved if not objected to within 15 days of receipt by the Client.

SUMMARIZED COST
Our proposed cost for the work described above is as follows and is based on our current contract rate schedule at a time-and-materials cost; see attached Exhibit C. This is an estimate of work, and factors such as site schedule, work requirements, and other considerations may affect this price. Please see Exhibit B for a full breakdown of hours anticipated for this project.

Items Task Fee
Towill Topographic Survey $33,904
Optional Mark and Locate $15,000
Thank you for this opportunity, and we look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, or if, for any reason, it does not meet your budget or time constraints, please contact me to discuss options to revise the proposal to better suit your needs. I can be reached by phone at (925) 682-6976 ext. 1032 or by email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
TOWILL, INC.

John T. May, PLS
Project Manager

Exhibit A

Limits of Site in Red

KJ-Scotts Valley
PERSONNEL Principal Surveyor Senior PM / LS Survey PM / LS Project Surveyor / LS Associate Surveyor / LSIT Survey Tech CADD Tech 1 Man Crew 1 Man Crew OT 2 Man Crew 2 Man Crew OT Tot Hrs TOTALS Hourly Rates $275.00 $257.00 $225.00 $200.00 $184.00 $157.00 $124.00 $200.00 $300.00 $360.00 $540.00 TRAVEL TIME / PER CREW MEMBER Ken Frank/John Menashe/ John H Matt/John G/Touko/Angela Kristine / Ivan / Kim / Kat/ Maceo / Jeff Nguyen / Max / Tom Intern Start Up & Coordination
Start Up & Coordination 1 1 2 hrs $482.00 $482.00Topographic and Utility SurveyField Mobilizations 4 2 8 2 40 56 hrs $17,614.00Office Deliverables 4 4 5 70 83 hrs $15,808.00 Topographic and Utility Survey $33,422.00
Project Total
$33,904.00
TOTAL HOURS 0 9 5 7 78 2 0 0 0 40 0 141 $33,904.00 TOTAL COST $0.00 $2,313.00 $1,125.00 $1,400.00 $14,352.00 $314.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,400.00 $0.00 $33,904.00 $33,904.00TOTAL DAYS BY PERSONNEL 0 1.125 0.625 0.875 9.75 0.25 0 0 0 4 0TOTAL OFFICE DAYS 12.625 Total Field days 4 10 hr days ODC's hours RATE UNITS/DAYS Sub-/total
Optional Mark and Locate 5000 3 15000
0000
TOTAL 0 3 $15,000.00
ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL $48,904.00
Towill Fee Schedule NorCal Survey 2026
Field Crew

EXHIBIT C

LAND SURVEY SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Effective January 1, 2026
Labor Description Hourly Rate
Principal Land Surveyor / Geomatics Principal Manager ........................................................................... $ 275.00 Senior Land Surveyor / Senior Project Manager ........................................................................................... $ 268.00 Survey Project Manager ..................................................................................................................................... $ 235.00 Project Surveyor ................................................................................................................................................. $ 200.00 Associate Surveyor ............................................................................................................................................. $ 184.00 Survey Technician (Office) ............................................................................................................................... $ 157.00 CADD Technician ............................................................................................................................................. $ 127.00 Project Coordinator ........................................................................................................................................... $ 113.00 Prevailing Wage Rates by Field Survey Personnel Classifications One Person ......................................................................................................................................................... $ 200.00 Two Person ......................................................................................................................................................... $ 360.00 Notes:
• Field survey personnel and crews are billed at a minimum of 8 hours per day only. • Field survey rates are inclusive of one survey vehicle, vehicle mileage up to 50 miles from the home office, conventional and GPS survey equipment, and standard safety equipment. • Hydrographic equipment mobilization to the site will be charged at a per day mobilization of $1350 per day. Will consist of rubber boat, and single beam (sounding unit). For multi-beam hydrographic survey, a per day mobilization fee of $2500. Determination of means and methods of the hydrographic survey will be conducted prior to the start of the survey.

SPECIAL LABOR RATES
Labor Description Hourly Rate
Hazmat Crew Supplement ..................................................................... Field Personnel Rate plus $10.00 per Person per Hour Night Shift Work ...................................................................................... Field Personnel Rate plus 12.5% per Person per Hour

AUTHORIZED OVERTIME LABOR RATES
Labor Description Hourly Rate
Saturdays and in Excess of 8 Hours on Weekdays .................................................................................... 1.5 times Regular Rate Sundays and Holidays ...................................................................................................................................... 2.0 times Regular Rate

EQUIPMENT AND OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Equipment Description Rate
Terrestrial Static Laser Scanner ............................................................................................................... Quote Provided per Project Terrestrial Mobile Laser Scanner ............................................................................................................ Quote Provided per Project Specialty Survey Equipment .................................................................................................................... Quote Provided per Project Client shall pay the costs, plus 10%, for any applicable government fees, title company charges, subconsultant fees, outside vendor costs, reproduction costs, vehicle mileage (except as noted above), travel related costs, rental vehicles and boats, rental and specialty equipment, consumable materials, digital delivery media, and delivery or messenger services incurred on Client’s behalf.

Appendix B
Geotechnical Proposal

GEOTECHNICAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

WATER RESOURCES

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS
2350 Mission College Boulevard, Suite 800, Santa Clara, CA 95054  (408) 574-4900  [email protected] www.engeo.com
Project No.

P30480.000.001
January 28, 2026
Ms. Claudia Llerandi
Kennedy Jenks
2121 N. California Boulevard, Suite 810
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Subject: MBR Package Treatment Plant
700 Lundy Lane
Scotts Valley, California

PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
References: 1. Pacific Crest Engineering Inc. 2022. Geotechnical Investigation, City of Scotts Valley, Department of Public Works. December 2022.

2. Bowman & Williams Consulting Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors. 2022.

Demolition Plan City of Scott’s Valley DPW-701 Lundy Lane. Scotts Valley, California. August 2022.

Dear Ms. Llerandi:

We present this proposal to perform geotechnical engineering services to support the planning and design of the proposed Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) package treatment plant within the Water Reclamation Facility located at 700 Lundy Lane in Scotts Valley, California. In preparation for this proposal, we were provided with an existing geotechnical investigation report for the site dated December 2022 (Reference 1). We also reviewed publicly available demolition plans for buildings formerly located on the site.

GEOTECHNICAL BACKGROUND
The approximately 1½-acre site is located within Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 021-27-1098 in Scotts Valley, California, and is currently paved and occupied by trailers and soil/debris mounds.

Based on our review of the geotechnical investigation report performed by Pacific Crest Engineering Inc. in December 2022, we understand that the site is underlain by up to 10 feet of fill consisting of loose to medium dense sand. The fill is underlain by loose to medium dense sandy alluvial deposits. In the northern portion of the site, the native deposits include an approximately 5-foot-thick layer of highly compressible, soft, organic-rich clay that was reported below a depth of about 10 feet below grade. Bedrock was noted at depths between approximately 17 and 22 feet in most of the borings. Groundwater was recorded in all borings at depths ranging from 5 to 10 feet.

Santa Cruz County hazard mapping characterizes the site as having moderate liquefaction potential. The site is located roughly 50 feet southeast of the Evers Creek channel, posing a risk for liquefaction-induced lateral spreading.

Kennedy Jenks P30480.000.001
MBR Package Treatment Plant January 28, 2026
PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 2
Based on the existing subsurface data and mapping, it is our opinion that the MBR plant foundation design will need to consider the presence of potentially liquefiable material and up to 5 feet of highly compressible soft organic clay underlying the site.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1: Geotechnical Report
Our proposed scope of services will include a limited field investigation to supplement the existing data. Our field exploration will focus on confirming the subsurface conditions documented in the existing borings and filling data gaps, including shear-wave velocity data for seismic site classification and soil corrosion potential for foundation and utility design. Our proposed scope of services is detailed in the following subsections.

Available Data Review
We will review the existing reports and construction documents by others, available geologic maps, topographic maps, historical aerial photographs, and other geotechnical information pertaining to the site. We will incorporate the existing boring and laboratory data in our analysis of the site.

Field Exploration
To characterize the subsurface conditions for design, we propose to supplement the existing data by exploring the site with one boring, as a confirmation boring to supplement the available historical borings, and geophysical surface wave testing at the proposed locations shown in Exhibit 1. The proposed boring will be advanced within the limits of the demolished building that was formerly at the site.

EXHIBIT 1: Proposed Exploration Site Plan

Kennedy Jenks P30480.000.001
MBR Package Treatment Plant January 28, 2026
PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 3
• Boring – We will retain the services of a subcontractor to perform drilling one boring to bedrock. We anticipate the boring extending up to 20 feet below the existing ground surface or to rig refusal if it occurs at a shallower depth.
 We will log the soil encountered and collect soil samples using split-spoon and modified California samplers, depending on the material encountered during drilling.  We will containerize soil cuttings from the exploratory boring in 55-gallon drums and temporarily store them at a designated location on site prior to off-site disposal. Our fee assumes the material will be classified (based on the results of analytical testing) and disposed of as Class II non-hazardous material; should supplemental testing be needed, or if the material disposal costs are anticipated to be greater than assumed, we will discuss with you the changed condition prior to offhaul.
• Geophysical Surface Wave Testing – We assume that the project will follow the 2025 California Building Code (CBC), which incorporates the ASCE 7-22 standard by reference.

The ASCE 7-22 standard requires shear-wave velocity (VS) data for site classification purposes. To evaluate the seismic site conditions to support site classification in accordance with the 2025 California Building Code and ASCE 7-22, we will retain a qualified geophysical subcontractor to perform Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) testing. This non-invasive method will be used to measure shear-wave velocity (VS) profiles of the subsurface materials, providing data for seismic design parameters. The results will be incorporated into our geotechnical analysis and recommendations.

We anticipate that the field exploration will take approximately 1 to 2 days to complete.

Permitting and Utility Clearance
Prior to commencing our subsurface exploration services, we will obtain a geotechnical exploration drilling permit from Santa Cruz County for the proposed boring. We will coordinate and grout the exploratory boring in accordance with permit requirements.

At least 48 hours prior to drilling, we will mark the site for an Underground Service Alert (USA) utilities check. We will retain the services of a private utility locator to clear readily identifiable utilities at the proposed exploration location.

Laboratory Testing
We will perform limited laboratory testing in our ASTM-accredited in-house geotechnical laboratory to evaluate the engineering characteristics of the soil samples.

We also plan to perform soil corrosion potential testing on two samples. The testing suite will include pH, redox, resistivity, sulfate, and chloride content. The testing will be performed on samples collected within the fill material and within the organic clay layer.

Analysis and Report Preparation
We will analyze the subsurface and geophysical data and prepare a geotechnical report. The report will include the following, as appropriate.
• Discussion of the field operations and testing
• Discussion of physical properties of the typical soil/rock encountered on site

Kennedy Jenks P30480.000.001
MBR Package Treatment Plant January 28, 2026
PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 4
• Assessment of geological and geotechnical hazards, including:
 Proximity of the site to active faults
 Treatment of geotechnical constraints such as loose/soft surface soil, existing fill, expansive soil, liquefaction, lateral spreading and others based on field exploration results  Groundwater conditions
• Site preparation and grading recommendations, including:
 Site preparation and temporary excavation considerations  Handling of on-site soil
 Acceptable fill material
 Subgrade preparation
 Fill placement and utility backfill recommendations
• Soil corrosion potential based on laboratory corrosion tests • 2025 California Building Code site class and seismic design criteria. • Foundation alternatives and design recommendations for the proposed MBR plant, including:
 Recommended depth and size of foundation
 Bearing capacity
 Lateral resistance
• Flexible and rigid pavement design recommendations
We will prepare a draft geotechnical report for your review. Following your review, we will address any comments and finalize our report. The geotechnical report will include a summary of the surface and subsurface conditions, seismicity, laboratory test data, boring log data, MASW data, and a site plan showing previous and current exploration locations and project limits.

Task 2: Consultation
We will attend project meetings and provide consultation, as needed.

FEE AND SCHEDULE
We propose to perform the above-described scope of services for the fees presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Fee Estimate

SCOPE FEE FEE TYPE
Task 1 – Geotechnical Report $65,000 Fixed-Fee
Task 2 – Consultation $5,000 Time-and-Expense
TOTAL $70,000
Upon authorization, we expect our field exploration to be completed within 4 to 5 weeks depending on the County of Santa Cruz drilling permit turnaround time and the availability of our drilling and geophysical testing subcontractors. We can provide our draft geotechnical report within 4 weeks of completion of the field exploration. In total, we estimate 8 to 9 weeks from authorization to delivery of a draft geotechnical report. We will finalize the draft design report following your review.

Once you have accepted our proposal, we will schedule personnel and subcontractors to perform the field exploration.

Kennedy Jenks P30480.000.001
MBR Package Treatment Plant January 28, 2026
PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 5

ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
• A field work plan is not necessary.
• Necessary removal or unlocking of fences or gates, permission to enter the site from the current owner or leaseholder, and/or required use permits must be secured by the client prior to our field activities. If site access or weather conditions restrict our field operations, a revision to our fee may be necessary.
• Prior to initiating our subsurface explorations, all site utilities and utility easements, including private utility pipes, must be accurately located in the field. This information must be made available to us at least 2 days prior to our field exploration. We will accept no responsibility for damage to existing utilities or irrigation pipes.
• We can perform our fieldwork between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday; on-site access will be provided during these hours. • If potentially hazardous materials are identified visually or by odor within our exploratory boring, we will notify you as soon as possible of such an occurrence in order to decide mutually whether to continue, suspend, modify, or cease the remainder of the field exploration program. All costs incurred as a result of encountering suspected hazardous materials would be charged on a time-and-expense basis.

AUTHORIZATION
ENGEO's liability for damage due to professional negligence, acts, errors, omissions, breach of contract and consequential damages will be limited by Client to an amount not to exceed an aggregate limit of two hundred thousand dollars, or ENGEO’s fee, whichever is greater, regardless of the legal theory under which such liability is imposed.

If the above scope of services and fee are acceptable, please send a consulting agreement for our review and acceptance. We can begin services upon receipt of an executed agreement We look forward to continuing to serve you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call and we will be glad to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,
ENGEO Incorporated
Genesis Palacios, PhD Yanet Zepeda, GE
Staff Engineer Associate
gp/yz/nn/ca
Attachment: Preferred Client Fee Schedule
Source: Ten Arquitectos

GEOTECHNICAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

WATER RESOURCES

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS
February 10, 2025 www.engeo.com

PREFERRED CLIENT FEE SCHEDULE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Effective February 2025
President .......................................................................................................................... $495.00 per hour Principal............................................................................................................................ $415.00 per hour Associate.......................................................................................................................... $345.00 per hour Subject Matter Expert........................................................................................................ $450.00 per hour Senior............................................................................................................................... $290.00 per hour Project.............................................................................................................................. $258.00 per hour Staff.................................................................................................................................. $230.00 per hour Assistant........................................................................................................................... $183.00 per hour Construction Services Manager II ...................................................................................... $235.00 per hour* Construction Services Manager I ....................................................................................... $225.00 per hour* Senior Field Representative II............................................................................................ $195.00 per hour*/** Senior Field Representative I............................................................................................. $175.00 per hour*/** Field Representative ......................................................................................................... $161.00 per hour*/** Senior Laboratory Technician............................................................................................ $195.00 per hour Laboratory Technician....................................................................................................... $175.00 per hour Senior GIS Developer ....................................................................................................... $210.00 per hour GIS Developer .................................................................................................................. $200.00 per hour Senior GIS Analyst............................................................................................................ $205.00 per hour GIS Analyst....................................................................................................................... $190.00 per hour Senior CAD Specialist ....................................................................................................... $190.00 per hour CAD Specialist.................................................................................................................. $180.00 per hour Network Administrator....................................................................................................... $265.00 per hour Project Assistant ............................................................................................................... $155.00 per hour * Two-hour minimum portal to portal and cancellations within 24 hours. * OVERTIME RATES: Rates will be increased by a factor of 1.5 for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) Monday through Friday, and the first eight (8) hours worked on Saturday. Rates will be increased by a factor of 2.0 for all hours worked in excess of twelve (12) Monday through Friday, all hours worked in excess of eight (8) on Saturday, and all hours worked on Sundays and holidays. ** For Prevailing Wage projects, the hourly rate will be increased by $22. ** Rates will be increased by factor of 1.25 for night-shift hours (hours commencing after 4:00 p.m. or before 4:00 a.m.); rates will be increased by a factor of 1.875 (an additional factor of 1.5) for all night-shift hours in excess of eight (8); rates will be increased by a factor 2.5 for all night-shift hours worked in excess of twelve (12).

Scheduled night-shift work, which is cancelled with less than 24 hours’ notice, will be billed at night-shift rates. Night-shift work of less than 4-hour scheduled duration will be billed a minimum of 4 hours at night shift rates.

ADDITIONAL SERVICES OFFERED
In addition to our core services of geotechnical, hydrologic and environmental engineering, including construction-phase testing and observation, ENGEO provides clients with services for establishment and management of Geologic Hazard Abatement Districts (GHAD) and for Entitlement and Permitting Support (EPS). For more information about these services and associated pricing, please contact ENGEO at (925) 866-9000.

OTHER FEES
• Equipment and materials will be charged in addition to the above hourly rates. • Outside Consultants, Subcontracted Services and Equipment Rental ........................................................................... Cost plus 25% • Expert Witness, Deposition, Mediation, Arbitration, or Court Appearance (Minimum Charge) ........ $2,800.00 half day, $4,800.00 full day TERMS
Invoices will be submitted at completion of work or at approximately four week intervals and are due and payable upon receipt. Statements will be issued at monthly intervals. Charges not paid within 30 days of invoice date will accrue a late charge at a rate of 1.5 percent per month. In the event it becomes necessary to commence suit to collect amount due, Client agrees to pay attorney's fees and costs, as the court may deem reasonable until amount is paid. Fees will be applicable for one year from the effective date above; thereafter, fees will be adjusted annually. Our fees will be billed using an invoice format produced by a standardized accounting software package. A more customized itemization of charges and backup data will be provided upon Client’s requests, but at additional fees. Final reports may be withheld until outstanding invoices are paid in full.

Many risks potentially affect ENGEO by virtue of entering into this agreement to perform services on behalf of client. A principal risk is the potential for human error by ENGEO. For client to obtain the benefit of a fee that includes a nominal allowance for dealing with our liability, client agree to limit ENGEO’s liability to Client and all other parties for claims arising out of our performance of the services described in the agreement. The aggregate liability will not exceed $50,000 (or ENGEO’s fee, whichever is greater, but not more than $1,000,000) for professional acts, errors, or omissions, including attorney’s fees and costs that may be awarded to the prevailing party and client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless ENGEO from and against all liabilities in excess of the monetary limit established above.

EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS CHARGES
February 10, 2025 www.engeo.com
DESCRIPTION COST PER UNIT ($) UNIT
Air Content Meter 7.00 hour
Bailers (Disposable) 10.00 each
Coatings Thickness Kit (eg. Fireproofing, Protective Paint) 30.00 hour Concrete Crack Monitor 20.00 each
Coring Machine 30.00 hour
Double-Ring Infiltrometer 50.00 hour
Electronic Water Level Indicator 5.00 hour
Engineering Analysis Software 51.00 hour
Equipment Transport(er) 100.00 hour
Exploration Equipment (Electric Auger) 50.00 hour
Floor Flatness/Floor Level Equipment 40.00 hour
Generator 15.00 hour
GIS Website Portal Subscriptions 50.00 month
GPS Handheld Device 10.00 hour
GPR/GPS/Drone Survey Equipment 235.00 hour
Hand Auger and Soil Sampler 15.00 hour
Hydraulic Pull-Test Equipment 25.00 hour
Interface Probe 2.00 hour
Magnetic Particle Test Equipment 25.00 hour
Moisture Content Test Equipment 6.00 hour
Multi-Parameter Water Meter 15.00 hour
pH Meter/Turbidity Meter 10.00 hour
Photo Ionization Detector 20.00 hour
Reinforcing Bar Locator 100.00 hour
Sampling Tubes 10.00 each
Sand Cone Equipment and Material 5.00 hour
Schmidt Hammer 20.00 hour
Seisometer 50.00 hour
Skidmore Wilhelm Bolt Tension Calib. 40.00 hour
Slope Inclinometer/Settlement Indicator/VW Readout 50.00 hour Torque Wrench 15.00 hour
Transfer Pump 3.00 hour
Ultrasonic Equipment 50.00 hour
Vapor Emission Test Kit 40.00 kit
Vector Conversion 60.00 conversion
Vehicle, nuclear gauge, equipment, wireless communication. *Add $5.00/hr. for RTK enabled autotesting equipment. 36.00* hour Vehicle, equipment, wireless communication 26.00 hour
Vibration Monitor 1800.00 month
Water Sampling Pumps 20.00 hour
Bridge Toll actual actual
Mileage .98 mile
Parking actual actual
AutoCAD, Civil 3D, GIS, Drone Data Processing 36.00 hour BoreDM Bore Log 55.00 per log
Photocopies Black & White 0.25 each
Photocopies Color 11 x 17 1.50 each
Photocopies Color 8½ x 11 1.00 each
Plot - Black & White 3.00 square foot
Plot - Color 4.00 square foot
Postage actual actual
Scan - Black & White 1.50 each
Scan - Color 3.75 each
Telephone 0.50 minute

Appendix C
Drawings Sheet List

# 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SHEET NO SHEET TITLE

GENERAL
1 * * * * G-001 TITLE SHEET, PROJECT VICINITY MAP, AND LOCATION MAP 2 * * * * G-002 DRAWING INDEX
3 * * * * G-003 GENERAL ABBREVIATIONS
4 * * * * G-004 GENERAL NOTES AND LEGENDS
5 * * * * G-005 GENERAL EQUIPMENT DESIGNATIONS AND PROCESS IDENTIFICATION CODES 6 * * * * G-006 GENERAL PROCESS SYMBOLS
7 * * * * G-007 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
8 * * * * G-008 HYDRAULIC PROFILE
9 * * * G-009 DESIGN CRITERIA
10 * * * * G-010 SITE ACCESS, STORAGE, AND STAGING PLAN 11 * * * * G-011 SITE SEQUENCING PLAN
12 * * * * CD-301 CIVIL DEMOLITION AND TEMPORARY UTILITIES PLAN - I 13 * * * * CD-302 CIVIL DEMOLITION AND TEMPORARY UTILITIES PLAN - II 14 * * * CD-499 CIVIL DEMOLITION DETAILS - I
15 * * * CD-500 CIVIL DEMOLITION DETAILS - II
16 * * * * MD-001 MECHANICAL DEMOLITION PLAN AND DETAILS - I 17 * * * * MD-002 MECHANICAL DEMOLITION PLAN AND DETAILS - II 18 * * * * ED-001 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLAN AND DETAILS - I 19 * * * * ED-002 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLAN AND DETAILS - II 20 * * * * ED-003 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM - I 21 * * * * ED-004 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM - II 22 * * * * IC-001 I &C DEMOLITION DETAILS - I
23 * * * * IC-002 I &C DEMOLITION DETAILS - II
CIVIL
24 * * * * C-001 CIVIL NOTES
25 * * * C-002 CIVIL LEGEND
26 * * * C-003 STANDARD DETAILS - I
27 * * * C-004 STANDARD DETAILS - II
28 * * * * C-005 OVERALL SITE PLAN
29 * * * * C-101 HORIZONTAL CONTROL AND PAVING PLAN - I 30 * * * * C-201 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - I
31 * * * * C-301 YARD PIPING PLAN - I
32 * * * C-351 PIPING PROFILES - I
33 * * * C-352 PIPING PROFILES - II
34 * * C-501 DETAILS - I
35 * * C-502 DETAILS - II

ARCHITECTURAL
36 * * * * A-001 CODE SUMMARY, SCHEDULES, AND NOTES
37 * * A-002 ARCHITECTURAL STANDARD DETAILS - I
38 * * A-003 ARCHITECTURAL STANDARD DETAILS - II
39 * * * * XX-A-01 BLOWER BUILDING - FLOOR AND ROOF PLAN 40 * * * * XX-A-02 BLOWER BUILDING - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 41 * * * XX-A-03 BLOWER BUILDING - SECTIONS

STRUCTURAL
42 * * * S-001 STRUCTURAL - GENERAL NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS 43 * * * S-002 STRUCTURAL - SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING NOTES - II 44 * * * S-003 STRUCTURAL - SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING NOTES - II 45 * * * S-004 STRUCTURAL - STANDARD DETAILS - I
46 * * * S-005 STRUCTURAL - STANDARD DETAILS - II
47 * * * S-006 STRUCTURAL - STANDARD DETAILS - III
48 * * * XX-S-01 MBR - FOUNDATION PLAN AND SECTIONS
49 * * * XX-S-01 BLOWER AND ELECTRICAL BUILDING - FOUNDATION PLAN AND ROOF PLAN 50 * * * XX-S-02 BLOWER AND ELECTRICAL BUILDING - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 51 * * * XX-S-01 UV DISINFECTION CANOPY - FOUNDATION PLAN AND ROOF PLAN 52 * * * XX-S-02 UV DISINFECTION CANOPY - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 53 * * * XX-S-01 SLUDGE HOLDING TANK AND DEWATERING - FOUNDATION PLAN AND SECTIONS

DEMOLITION

DRAWING INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)

# 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SHEET NO SHEET TITLE

DRAWING INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)

PROCESS MECHANICAL
54 * * * * M-001 MECHANICAL ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTES
55 * * * M-002 STANDARD DETAILS - I
56 * * * M-003 STANDARD DETAILS - II
57 * * * M-501 DETAILS - I
58 * * * M-502 DETAILS - II
59 * * * XX-M-01 ELECTRICAL BUILDING - PLAN
60 * * * XX-M-02 ELECTRICAL BUILDING - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 61 * * * * XX-M-01 INFLUENT PUMP STATION - UPPER PLAN
62 * * * * XX-M-02 INFLUENT PUMP STATION - LOWER PLAN
63 * * * * XX-M-03 INFLUENT PUMP STATION - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 64 * * * * XX-M-01 FLOW METER VAULT - PLAN AND SECTIONS 65 * * * * XX-M-01 FINE SCREENING AND GRIT REMOVAL - PLAN 66 * * * * XX-M-03 FINE SCREENING AND GRIT REMOVAL - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 67 * * * * XX-M-01 MBR EQ TANK AND FEED PUMPS - PLAN
68 * * * * XX-M-02 MBR EQ TANK AND FEED PUMPS - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 69 * * * * XX-M-01 BNR/MBR OVERALL PLAN
70 * * * * XX-M-02 BNR/MBR TANKS - PLAN
71 * * * * XX-M-04 BNR/MBR TANKS - SECTIONS - I
72 * * * * XX-M-05 BNR/MBR TANKS - SECTIONS - II
73 * * * * XX-M-01 BLOWER BUILDING - PLAN
74 * * * * XX-M-02 BLOWER BUILDING - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 75 * * * * XX-M-01 UV DISINFECTION - PLAN
76 * * * * XX-M-02 UV DISINFECTION - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 77 * * * * XX-M-01 RECYCLED WATER TANK AND TRANSFER PUMP STATION - PLAN 78 * * * * XX-M-02 RECYCLED WATER TANK AND TRANSFER PUMP STATION - SECTIONS AND DETAILS 79 * * * * XX-M-01 MBR CIP - PLAN
80 * * * * XX-M-02 MBR CIP - SECTIONS AND DETAILS
81 * * * * XX-M-01 SLUDGE HOLDING TANK AND DEWATERING - PLAN 82 * * * * XX-M-02 SLUDGE HOLDING TANK AND DEWATERING - SECTIONS 83 * * * * XX-M-03 SLUDGE HOLDING TANK AND DEWATERING - DETAILS

BUILDING MECHANICAL
84 * * * H-001 HVAC ABBREVIATIONS, NOTES, AND LEGEND
85 * * * H-002 HVAC STANDARD DETAILS
86 * * * H-003 HVAC EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES
87 * * * XX-H-01 ELECTRICAL BUILDING - HVAC PLAN
88 * * * XX-H-02 ELECTRICAL BUILDING - HVAC SECTIONS
89 * * * * XX-H-01 BLOWER BUILDING - HVAC PLAN
90 * * * XX-H-02 BLOWER BUILDING - HVAC SECTIONS

PLUMBING
91 * * * P-001 PLUMBING ABBREVIATIONS, NOTES, AND LEGEND 92 * * * P-002 PLUMBING DETAILS
93 * * * P-003 PLUMBING SCHEDULES
94 * * * XX-P-01 MBR AREA - PLUMBING PLAN - I
95 * * * XX-P-02 MBR AREA - PLUMBING PLAN - II
96 * * * XX-P-01 SOLIDS TREATMENT BUILDING - PLUMBING PLAN

# 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SHEET NO SHEET TITLE

DRAWING INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)

ELECTRICAL
97 * * * * E-001 ELECTRICAL ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTES
98 * * * * E-002 ELECTRICAL LEGEND - I
99 * * * * E-003 ELECTRICAL LEGEND - II
100 * * * E-004 ELECTRICAL STANDARD DETAILS - I
101 * * * E-005 ELECTRICAL STANDARD DETAILS - II
102 * * E-011 DUCTBANK SECTIONS - I
103 * * E-012 DUCTBANK SECTIONS - II
104 * * * * E-021 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
105 * * * E-031 PANELBOARD SCHEDULES
106 * * * * E-041 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM - I
107 * * * * E-042 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM - II
108 * * * * E-043 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM - III
109 * * * E-045 MCC ELEVATION
110 * * * E-052 CONTROL SCHEMATIC - I (INFLUENT PUMPS)
111 * * * E-059 CONTROL SCHEMATIC - II (RECYLED WATER PUMPS) 112 * * * E-060 CONTROL SCHEMATIC - III (SOLIDS FEED PUMP) 113 * * E-062 CONDUIT BLOCK DIAGRAM - I
114 * * E-063 CONDUIT BLOCK DIAGRAM - II
115 * * E-071 CONDUIT AND CABLE SCHEDULE - I
116 * * E-072 CONDUIT AND CABLE SCHEDULE - II
117 * * * E-XXX ELECTRICAL BUILDING - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN 118 * * E-XXX ELECTRICAL BUILDING - LTG, RECEPT, AND GROUNDING PLAN 119 * * * E-XXX INFLUENT PUMP STATION - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN 120 * * E-XXX INFLUENT PUMP STATION - LTG, RECEPT, AND GROUNDING PLAN 121 * * * E-XXX MBR INFLUENT FLOW METER - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN 122 * * * E-XXX MBR AREA - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN - I
123 * * * E-XXX MBR AREA - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN - II
124 * * * E-XXX MBR AREA - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN - III
125 * * E-XXX MBR AREA - LTG, RECEPT, AND GROUNDING PLAN - I 126 * * E-XXX MBR AREA - LTG, RECEPT, AND GROUNDING PLAN - II 127 * * E-XXX MBR AREA - LTG, RECEPT, AND GROUNDING PLAN - III 128 * * * E-XXX BLOWER ROOM - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN
129 * * E-XXX BLOWER ROOM - LTG, RECEPT, AND GROUNDING PLAN 130 * * * E-XXX UV/RW AREA - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN
131 * * E-XXX UV/RW AREA - LTG, RECEPT AND GROUNDING PLAN 132 * * * E-XXX SLUDGE STORAGE AND DEWATERING AREA - POWER AND SIGNAL PLAN 133 * * E-XXX SLUDGE STORAGE AND DEWATERING AREA - LTG, RECEPT AND GROUNDING PLAN

INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS
134 * * * * I-001 INSTRUMENTATION LEGEND AND NOTES
135 * * * I-002 INSTRUMENTATION STANDARD DETAILS - I
136 * * * I-003 INSTRUMENTATION STANDARD DETAILS - II
137 * * * I-004 NETWORK BLOCK DIAGRAM
138 * * * * XX-I-01 P&ID - INFLUENT PUMP STATION
139 * * * * XX-I-02 P&ID - FINE SCREENING AND GRIT REMOVAL 140 * * * * XX-I-03 P&ID - MBR EQ AND FEED PUMPS
141 * * * * XX-I-04 P&ID - BNR TRAIN - I
142 * * * XX-I-05 P&ID - BNR TRAIN - II
143 * * * * XX-I-06 P&ID - MBR TRAIN - I
144 * * * XX-I-07 P&ID - MBR TRAIN - II
145 * * * * XX-I-08 P&ID - PROCESS AERATION BLOWERS
146 * * * * XX-I-09 P&ID - MBR AIR SCOUR BLOWERS
147 * * * * XX-I-10 P&ID - MBR CIP SYSTEM
148 * * * * XX-I-11 P&ID - MBR PERMEATE PUMPS
149 * * * * XX-I-12 P&ID - UV DISINFECTION
150 * * * * XX-I-13 P&ID - UV CIP SYSTEM
151 * * * * XX-I-14 P&ID - RAS/WAS PUMPING SYSTEMS
152 * * * * XX-I-15 P&ID - RECYLED WATER BREAK TANK AND TRANSFER PUMP STATION 153 * * * * XX-I-16 P&ID - SLUDGE STORAGE AND DEWATERING 154 * * * * XX-I-17 P&ID - POLYMER STORAGE AND DOSING
155 * * * XX-I-18 CONTROL PANEL EXTERNAL ELEVATIONS
No. of sheets 76 137 155 155

Appendix D
Specifications List

# of Specs 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SECTION NO. TITLE
1 * * * * 00 01 10 Table of Contents
2 * * * 00 11 13 Advertisement for Bids
3 * * * 00 21 13 Instructions to Bidders
4 * * * 00 41 00 Bid Form
5 * * * 00 41 13 Bid Form - Stipulated Sum (Single-Prime Contract) 6 * * * 00 43 13 Bid Security Form
7 * * * 00 43 25 Substitution Request Form
8 * * * 00 43 33 Proposed Products Form
9 * * * 00 43 36 Proposed Subcontractors Form
10 * * * 00 43 53 Escrow Bid Documents
11 * * * 00 45 12 Bidder's Information
12 * * * 00 45 14 Bidder's Safety Performance
13 * * * 00 45 15 Bidder's Subcontractor Qualifications 14 * * * 00 45 19 Noncollusion Affidavit
15 * * * 00 45 41 Iran Contracting Act Disclosure Form
16 * * * 00 52 00 Agreement Form
17 * * * 00 61 13.13 Performance Bond Form
18 * * * 00 61 13.16 Payment Bond Form
19 * * * 00 62 05 Proprietary Information Agreement
20 * * * 00 65 36 Warranty Form
21 * * * 00 72 00 General Conditions
22 * * * 00 73 16 Inusurance Requirements
23 * * * 00 73 19 Health and Safety Requirements
24 * * * 00 73 38 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Requirements 25 * * * 00 73 43 Wage Rate Requirements
26 * * * 00 73 46 Wage Determination Schedule
27 * * * 00 73 83 Dispute Resolution
28 * * * 00 73 85 Clean Water State Revolving Fund Provisions

SPECIFICATIONS INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

# of Specs 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SECTION NO. TITLE

SPECIFICATIONS INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
29 * * * * 01 00 00 Cover Page
30 * * * * 01 01 10 Table of Contents
31 * * * 01 10 00 Professional Responsibilities and Seals 32 * * * 01 11 00 General Information and Summary of Work 33 * * * 01 14 00 Coordination and Project Requirements 34 * * * 01 14 10 Environmental Protection
35 * * * 01 14 16 System Access Request Requirements
36 * * 01 14 50 Work Restrictions
37 * * * 01 26 00 RFI Procedures
38 * * * 01 32 10 Construction Schedules and Reports
39 * * * 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures
40 * * * 01 35 10 Delegated Design Procedures
41 * * 01 35 44 Hazardous Materials Procedures
42 * * * 01 35 45 Wastewater Discharge Emergency Response Plan 43 * * * 01 45 00 Quality Control
44 * * * 01 50 00 Temporary Facilities and Controls
45 * * 01 55 26 Traffic Control
46 * * 01 77 00 Contract Closeout
47 * * * 01 78 23 Operations and Maintenance Manuals
48 * * * 01 79 10 Training
49 * * * 01 87 13 Structural Component and Equipment Performance Requirements 50 * * 01 91 00 Commissioning
51 * * 01 91 10 Commissioning Reference Test Forms
52 * * * 02 40 00 Demolition
53 * * * 03 10 00 Concrete Formwork and Formwork Accessories 54 * * * 03 15 00 Concrete Joints and Accessories
55 * * * 03 20 00 Concrete Reinforcement and Reinforcement Supports 56 * * * 03 30 00 Concrete Mixtures, Handling, Placing and Constructing 57 * * * 03 30 50 Hot Weather Concreting
58 * * * 03 30 60 Cold Weather Concreting
59 * * * 03 33 00 Concrete Curing and Protection
60 * * * 03 35 00 Concrete Finishing
61 * * * 03 60 00 Grouts
62 * * * 03 93 50 Repair of Defective Concrete
63 * * * 04 22 00 Concrete Masonry Units
64 * * * 05 05 23 Anchors in Concrete and Masonry
65 * * * 05 10 00 Structural Metal Framing
66 * * * 05 21 00 Open Web Steel Joists
67 * * * 05 31 00 Structural Metal Deck
68 * * * 05 40 00 Cold Formed Metal Framing
69 * * * 05 50 00 Metal Fabrications (Miscellaneous Metal) 70 * * * 05 73 00 Aluminum Component Railing System
DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
DIVISION 03 – CONCRETE
DIVISION 04 – MASONRY
DIVISION 05 – METALS

# of Specs 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SECTION NO. TITLE

SPECIFICATIONS INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
71 * * 07 10 00 Water Repellant Sealer
72 * * 07 21 00 Thermal Insulation
73 * * 07 41 13 Manufactured Metal Roof Panels
74 * * 07 62 00 Flashing and Sheet Metal
75 * * 07 72 00 Roof Accessories
76 * * 07 92 00 Joint Sealants
77 * * 08 31 00 Access Hatches
78 * * 08 33 23 Overhead Coiling Doors
79 * * 08 71 00 Finish Hardware
80 * * 08 91 00 Louvers
81 * * 09 29 00 Gypsum Wallboard
82 * * 09 51 00 Acoustical Treatment
83 * * 09 91 00 Painting
84 * * 09 96 00 High-Performance Coatings
85 * * 09 96 23 Graffiti Resistant Coating
86 * * 09 96 56 Chemical Resistant Epoxy Coating
87 * * 10 00 00 Building Specialties
88 * * 10 40 00 Identifying Devices
89 * * * 13 34 17 Pre-Engineered Metal Canopy Systems
90 * * * 13 47 14 Cathodic Protection for Buried Piping 91 * * * 22 00 00 Plumbing
92 * * * 23 30 00 Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Distribution 93 * * * 23 31 16 FRP Duct and Accessories
94 * * * 23 70 00 Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Equipment 95 * * * 23 80 00 Commissioning of HVAC Systems
DIVISION 07 – THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION
DIVISION 09 – FINISHES
DIVISION 10 – SPECIALTIES
DIVISION 13 – SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
DIVISION 22 – PLUMBING
DIVISION 08 – OPENINGS
DIVISION 23 – HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC)

# of Specs 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SECTION NO. TITLE

SPECIFICATIONS INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
96 * * * 26 01 26 Electrical Tests
97 * * * 26 05 00 General Electrical Requirements
98 * * * 26 05 10 Electric Motor Drives
99 * * * 26 05 19 Low Voltage Wire and Cable
100 * * * 26 05 20 Signal Cable
101 * * * 26 05 26 Electrical Grounding
102 * * * 26 05 33 Electrical Raceway Systems
103 * * * 26 05 43 Underground Electrical Work
104 * * * 26 05 73 Power System Studies
105 * * * 26 09 00 Control Devices
106 * * * 26 22 00 Dry Type Transformers
107 * * * 26 24 13 Switchboards
108 * * * 26 24 16 Panelboards
109 * * * 26 24 19 Motor Control Centers
110 * * * 26 27 26 Wiring Devices
111 * * * 26 28 00 Protective Devices and Switches
112 * * * 26 29 13 Motor Starters
113 * * * 26 29 23 Variable Frequency Drives
114 * * * 26 33 54 Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) 1.5kVA and Smaller 115 * * * 26 35 26 Harmonic Filters
116 * * * 26 43 00 Surge Protective Devices
117 * * * 26 50 00 Lighting
118 * * * 27 13 23 Communications Optical Fiber Backbone Cabling 119 * * * 31 00 00 Earthwork
120 * * * 31 10 00 Site Preparation
121 * * * 31 32 10 Excavation Support and Protection
122 * * * 31 43 16 Compaction Grouting
123 * * * 32 12 16 Paving and Surfacing
124 * * * 32 16 00 Concrete Curbs, Gutters and Sidewalks 125 * * * 33 01 10 Disinfection and Testing of Water Lines 126 * * * 33 05 19 Ductile Iron Pipe and Fittings
127 * * * 33 05 29 Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe – Pressure Systems 128 * * * 33 05 30 Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe – Gravity Systems 129 * * * 33 14 00 General Buried Piping Requirements
DIVISION 26 – ELECTRICAL
DIVISION 27 – COMMUNICATIONS
DIVISION 31 – EARTHWORK
DIVISION 32 – EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
DIVISION 33 – UTILITIES

# of Specs 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SECTION NO. TITLE

SPECIFICATIONS INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
130 * * * 40 05 08 Pipe Supports
131 * * * 40 05 57 Electric Valve Actuators
132 * * * 40 05 59 Sluice and Weir Gates
133 * * * 40 05 61 Gate Valves
134 * * * 40 05 62 Plug Valves
135 * * * 40 05 64 Butterfly Valves
136 * * * 40 05 65 Check Valves
137 * * * 40 05 67 Aeration Valves
138 * * * 40 05 68 Air Valves
139 * * * 40 27 00 Piping, Valves and Accessories
140 * * 40 27 10 Pipe Couplings
141 * * * 40 42 13 Piping Insulation
142 * * * 40 60 00 Instrumentation and Controls, General Requirements 143 * * * 40 60 01 Instrument Schedule
144 * * * 40 63 00 Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
145 * * * 40 63 01 PLC Input/Output Schedule
146 * * * 40 66 00 Networking and Communication
147 * * * 40 67 00 Panels
148 * * * 40 68 10 Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System 149 * * * * 40 68 20 Process Control Strategies and Programming 150 * * * * Overall MBR and UV Disinfection Control and Monitoring 151 * * * * MBR and UV Regulatory Monitoring and Reporting 152 * * * * Grit Removal
153 * * * * Influent Pumps and Flow Monitoring
154 * * * * Fine Screening
155 * * * * Flow Equalization and MBR Feed Pumps
156 * * * * MBR Packaged System (Anoxic, Aeration, Membranes, MLR, WAS, CIP) 157 * * * * UV Disinfection
158 * * * * RW Transfer Pumps and Storage
159 * * * * Biosolids Storage and Dewatering
160 * * * 40 71 00 Flow Measurement
161 * * * 40 72 00 Level Measurement
162 * * * 40 73 00 Pressure Measurement
163 * * * 40 74 00 Temperature Measurement
164 * * * 40 75 00 Process Analytical Instruments
165 * * * 40 78 00 Panel Mounted and Miscellaneous Field Instruments 166 * * * 41 22 13 Davit Cranes
167 * * 43 06 20 Equipment Schedule
168 * * * 43 1133 Rotary Blowers
169 * * * 43 23 31 Vertical Non-Clog Centrifugal Pumps
170 * * * 43 23 58 Rotary Lobe Pumps
171 * * * 43 24 13 Vertical Turbine Solids Handling Pumps 172 * * * 43 25 01 Submersible Wastewater Pumps
173 * * * 43 41 43 Polyethylene Storage Tanks (RW)
174 * * * Steel Storage Containers/Tanks (MBR Influent) DIVISION 40 – PROCESS PIPING AND INTEGRATION
DIVISION 41 – MATERIAL PROCESSING AND HANDLING EQUIPMENT DIVISION 43 – PROCESS GAS AND LIQUID HANDLING, PURIFICATION AND STORAGE EQUIPMENT

# of Specs 30% (PDR) 60% 90% 100% SECTION NO. TITLE

SPECIFICATIONS INDEX
Scotts Valley MBR (WWTP)
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
175 * * * 46 21 33 Fine Screens
176 * * * Grit Removal
177 * * * 46 33 44 Peristaltic Chemical Metering Pumps
178 * * * 46 51 46 Fine Bubble Aeration Diffusion Equipment 179 * * * 46 61 35 Membrane Filtration Equipment
180 * * * 46 66 15 UV Disinfection Equipment
181 * * * Submersible Mixers
No of Specs 14 155 181 181
DIVISION 46 – WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT

1 ProfServicesAgmTemplate2025

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement for Professional Services (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of May 6, 2026, by and between the City of Scotts Valley, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Kennedy Jenks Consultants, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “CONSULTANT”.

RECITALS
A. CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT for certain professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

B. CONSULTANT is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

C. CONSULTANT possesses the skill, ability, background, certification, and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual promises contained herein, CITY and CONSULTANT agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Employment of CONSULTANT:

CITY agrees to, and hereby does, retain and employ CONSULTANT to perform the professional services as outlined in the Scope of Work attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”. CONSULTANT’S work product shall be performed pursuant to generally accepted standards of practice in effect at the time of performance.

2. Responsible Personnel:

CITY has relied upon the professional training and ability of CONSULTANT to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Primary personnel responsible for the completion of the work described in this Agreement shall be:

Claudia Llerandi, PE
2121 North California Boulevard, Suite 810
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(415) 243-2506
[email protected]

3. Scope of Work:

Scope of Work – Phases of Services

2 ProfServicesAgmTemplate2025
Phase 2 Services (Authorized Work)
This Agreement authorizes Consultant to perform only the services identified as “Phase 2”, as described in the attached Scope of Work/Proposal dated March 16, 2026. Consultant shall provide all labor, materials, and services necessary to complete Phase 2 in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. No work associated with Phase 3 or any other phase is authorized unless expressly approved in writing by the City.

Phase 3 Services (Excluded/Future Authorization)
Phase 3 services are expressly excluded from the scope of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that Phase 3, if pursued, shall be subject to a separate written agreement or amendment to be brought forward at a future date and will require separate governing body approval, if applicable.

Preservation of Phase 3 Pricing
Notwithstanding the exclusion of Phase 3 from this Agreement, Consultant agrees to maintain the Phase 3 fee structure and pricing outlined in Consultant’s proposal dated March 16, 2026, for a period of 12 months from the effective date of this Agreement, should the City elect to proceed with Phase 3. After this period, Phase 3 pricing may be subject to revision and mutual agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, the ‘Effective Date’ shall be the date on which the Agreement is fully executed by both Parties.

No Obligation for Future Work
Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate the City to proceed with Phase 3 services, and any future Phase 3 work shall only be authorized through a duly executed amendment or separate agreement.

CONSULTANT shall perform the services as specified in Exhibit A in a professional manner. To the extent there is a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and Exhibit A, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

4. Time of Performance:

The services of CONSULTANT are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall continue until all authorized work is approved by the CITY. All such work shall be completed no later than 1 year from signing. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. No waiver by either party hereto of the nonperformance or any breach of any term, provision, or condition of this Agreement, or any default hereunder shall be considered to be or operate as a waiver of any subsequent nonperformance, breach, or default.

5. Compensation:

CONSULTANT shall accept compensation for services performed as set forth in Section 3 in an amount not to exceed $628,406.90. Periodic payments to CONSULTANT shall be made upon submittal of invoices by CONSULTANT to CITY for review and approval by the City Manager. Invoices will be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after the invoices are received and approved.

3 ProfServicesAgmTemplate2025

6. Insurance:

CONSULTANT agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of the Agreement, the following minimum insurance requirements. Prior to the execution of the Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide proof of insurance required. Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the CITY.

CONSULTANT shall furnish the CITY with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the CITY before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive CONSULTANT’s obligation to provide them. The CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. 1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9), with limit no less than $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits. 4. Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): As appropriate to CONSULTANT’s services, and not less than $5,000,000 per occurrence. 5. Sexual Abuse or Molestation (SAM) Liability: If the work will include contact with minors, and the CGL policy referenced above is not endorsed to include affirmative coverage for sexual abuse or molestation, Contractor shall obtain and maintain a policy covering Sexual Abuse and Molestation with a limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim.

The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

The City of Scotts Valley, its Council Members, elected and appointed officers, agents and employees shall be named as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Independent Contractor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work

4 ProfServicesAgmTemplate2025
or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Independent Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).

For any claims related to this Agreement, CONSULTANT’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage (at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13) with respect to the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or selfinsurance maintained by the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the CONSULTANT’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

CONSULTANT hereby grants to CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONSULTANT may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

CONSULTANT shall require the insurer to provide CITY with 30-day prior notice of termination or material change in coverage and ten (10) days prior notice of cancellation for non-payment.

7. Indemnity:

CONSULTANT shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend CITY, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, servants, volunteers, and employees from and against any and all claims, costs, damages, liability, losses, or suits (including court costs and attorney fees) for personal injury (including death), property damage and any other damages of any sort whatsoever, arising out of, or alleged to have arisen out of to the proportionate extent cause by, the willful or negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT'S contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees in the performance of this Agreement. This indemnity shall not apply to any claims brought by CONSULTANT for default of this Agreement, or for claims brought by CITY or any third party where the underlying injury or damage is finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to arise solely from the negligent or willful misconduct of CITY.

For design professionals (as that term is defined by statute) acting within the scope of their professional capacity, to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall, at its own expense, indemnify, protect, defend (by counsel reasonably satisfactory to the CITY) and hold harmless any Indemnified Parties from and against any and all Liability, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the CONSULTANT, or as may be provided by statute in Civil Code § 2782.8, as may be amended from time to time.

CONSULTANT’s duty to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless as set forth in this section shall include the duty to defend (by counsel reasonably satisfactory to the CITY)

5 ProfServicesAgmTemplate2025
as set forth in California Civil Code § 2778. The CONSULTANT’s responsibility to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties under this section shall not extend to the active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. This section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

8. Termination:

This Agreement may be terminated by the CITY immediately for cause or by either party without cause upon fifteen days’ written notice of termination. Upon termination, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination.

CONSULTANT shall accept, for itself, as full payment for services rendered and all work to be done and performed hereunder and in complete satisfaction of all claims against CITY by reason of voluntary abandonment or suspension of work or termination of the Agreement, the sum determined on an hourly basis in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, or any modification of amendment thereto, plus all direct expenses incurred, including those expenses incurred which are directly attributable to the incomplete portion of the work which could not be canceled.

In the event of termination, CONSULTANT shall deliver as a condition to the payment of the compensation provided for above, or otherwise make available to CITY, all research data, reports, estimates, summaries, and other such information and materials as may have been accumulated by CONSULTANT in performing this Agreement, whether completed or in process in accordance with Section 9 of this Agreement.

9. Documents:

Notes, studies, chain, computations, electronic files, and other data and information obtained by CONSULTANT for this project shall, upon receipt of payment for services rendered, be made available to CITY by CONSULTANT at CITY'S request and shall become the property of CITY. In the event CITY alters the document, CITY agrees CONSULTANT shall have no responsibility whatsoever for any claim arising out of, or alleged to have risen out of, use of the altered document.

All plans, studies, documents, charts, computations, and electronic files prepared by and for CONSULTANT, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and internal documents, shall become the property of the CITY upon payment to CONSULTANT for such work, and the CITY shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to CONSULTANT or to any other party. CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT’S expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents, and other writings to CITY upon written request.

10. Independent Contractor:

CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor retained by CITY to perform the work described herein. ALL personnel employed by CONSULTANT are not and shall not be

6 ProfServicesAgmTemplate2025
deemed to be employees of CITY. CONSULTANT shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits that accrue to CITY’S employees, and CONSULTANT hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to such rights. CONSULTANT shall comply with all state and federal laws pertaining to employment and compensation of its employees and its agents, including the provision of Workers' Compensation.

11. Licenses:

CONSULTANT represents and warrants to CITY that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of CONSULTANT to practice its profession. CONSULTANT represents and warrants to CITY that CONSULTANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of CONSULTANT to practice its profession.

CONSULTANT shall maintain a City of Scotts Valley business license.

12. CITY Not Obligated to Third Parties; Subcontractors; Oversight:

The CITY shall not be obligated or liable for payment hereunder to any party other than the CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall ensure the following requirements are satisfied in the performance of the Agreement with respect to its own employees:

A. Workers’ Compensation. CONSULTANT certifies that it is aware of the provisions of the California Labor Code which require every employee to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and CONSULTANT certifies that it will comply with such provisions before commencing performance of the Agreement and at all times in the performance of the Agreement.

B. Prevailing Wage. CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT’s subconsultants (if any) shall, to the extent required by the California Labor Code, pay not less than the latest prevailing wage rates to workers and professionals as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California pursuant to California Labor Code, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2. Copies of the applicable wage determination shall be available on file at the CITY’s office of the City Clerk.

C. Injury and Illness Prevention Program. CONSULTANT certifies that it is aware of and has complied with the provisions of California Labor Code § 6401.7, which requires every employer to adopt a written injury and illness prevention program.

D. CONSULTANT shall pay all taxes, assessments and premiums under the federal Social Security Act, any applicable unemployment insurance contributions, Workers Compensation insurance premiums, sales taxes, use taxes, personal property taxes, or other taxes or assessments now or hereafter in effect and

7 ProfServicesAgmTemplate2025
payable by reason of or in connection with the services to be performed by CONSULTANT.

The CITY is not responsible or liable for CONSULTANT’s failure to comply with any and all of its requirements under this section and Agreement.

13. Political Reform Act Economic Interests:

If CITY determines CONSULTANT comes within the definition of CONSULTANT under the Political Reform Act (Government Code §87100), CONSULTANT shall complete and file and shall require any other person doing work under this Agreement to complete and file a “Statement of Economic Interest” with the Clerk of the City of Scotts Valley disclosing CONSULTANT and/or such other person’s financial interests.

14. Assignment:

The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to CITY for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience, and competence of CONSULTANT. Assignments of any or all rights, duties, or obligations of the CONSULTANT under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of the CITY. CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of the CITY. If the CITY consents to such subcontract, CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to CITY for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between CITY and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the CITY to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such contractor other than as otherwise required by law.

15. Binding on Successors:

This Agreement is binding on the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

16. Amendment:

This Agreement may be amended, modified, or changed by the parties, provided that said Agreement, modification or change is in writing and approved by the authorized representative of the parties.

17. Applicable Law and Attorney's Fees:

This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Santa Cruz. Should any legal action be brought by a party for breach of this Agreement or to enforce any provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party of such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including attorney fees.

18. Entire Agreement:

This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. There are no representations, agreements, or

8 ProfServicesAgmTemplate2025
understandings. Whether oral or written, between or among the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. The drafting and negotiation of this Agreement have been participated in by each of the parties and/or their counsel, and for all purposes this Agreement shall be deemed to have been drafted jointly by all parties.

19. Waiver:

Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this agreement.

20. Severability:

If any term or portion of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement is executed by CITY and by CONSULTANT on this 6th day of May, 2026, at Scotts Valley, California.

CONSULTANT CITY OF SCOTTS VALLEY
**signature_102658**

SIGNATURE
Claudia Llerandi, PE

FULL NAME
**date_signed_102658**

DATE SIGNED
**signature_102660**

SIGNATURE
Mali LaGoe, City Manager

FULL NAME
**date_signed_102660**

DATE SIGNED
APPROVED AS TO FORM: KIRSTEN POWELL, CITY

ATTORNEY
ATTEST:
**signature_102666**

SIGNATURE
Kirsten M. Powell, City Attorney

FULL NAME
**date_signed_102666**

DATE SIGNED
**signature_102662**

SIGNATURE
Cathie Simonovich, City Clerk

FULL NAME
**date_signed_102662**

DATE SIGNED

Exhibits List
A - ScottsValley_MBR_Design_Proposal_3.16.2026

Exhibit A
ScottsValley_MBR_Design_Proposal_3.16.2026

CITY OF SCOTTS VALLEY
Membrane Bioreactor(MBR) Package PlantDesign
City staff reached out to Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. (KJ) to provide a scope of work to provide design services to complete the design of a new Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) treatment facility to produce recycled water that complies with the agreement and regulatory requirements for serving Scotts Valley Water District recycled water and to alleviate treatment demands on the existing Water Reclamation Facility (WRF).

The proposed scope for the MBR design is planned in 4 phases as illustrated in Figure 1. Phase 1 for alternative analysis and conceptual design of the MBR plant to a 10% level was completed in May 2025.

This scope of work provides a detailed scope and fee estimate to perform Phase 2 MBR design package up to 30% design. A detailed scope will be prepared in the future as requested by the City for phases 3 and 4 to complete the MBR design, provide support to the City with bids, for engineering services during construction (ESDC), startup and commissioning support.

Figure 1. Flow Chart to Implement the Scotts Valley MBR Package Plant Design Phase 1:

Alternatives Analysis
& Conceptual Design
Define Design Criteria
MBR/UV Package
Plant Vendor Options
Conceptual Facilities
Siting
10% Design
Conceptual Cost
Estimate
Technical
Memorandum
Phase 2: Preliminary
Design
Package Plant
Vendor Pre-Selection
Field Investigations
(Survey / Geotech)
30% Design,
Specifications&
Costs
Preliminary Design
Report
Phase 3: Design &
Bid
60% Design,
Specifications and
Costs
90% Design,
Specifications, and
Costs
100% Design
Specifications, and
Costs
Bid Support Services
Phase 4: ESDC
Engineering Services
During Construction
Startup and
Commissioning
Support

Project Background
In 2024, the City approved a scope effort to complete Phase 1 of this project with an alternatives analysis for the selection of a location for the MBR package plant and to develop a 10% conceptual design for the MBR system. Kennedy Jenks developed a 10% design package and a technical memorandum for a parallel MBR and UV treatment facility that could treat 0.5 MGD with the option to expand to 0.75 MGD in the future, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Concept for MBR/UV Package Plant
The MBR/UV package plant would be supplied with raw wastewater from the WRF existing influent pump station, and the produced effluent will be sent to the existing WRF recycled water storage tank for distribution to Scotts Valley Water District. The wasted sludge will be processed at a solids holding tank and dewatering screw press system for disposal, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: General MBR/UV Package Treatment Process Flow Diagram

With the addition of a new split-stream treatment process, the existing tertiary treatment system will be decommissioned, and the operation of the existing secondary treatment process will return to its original design intent as a BOD/TSS removal treatment process.

During the Phase 1 alternatives evaluation three MBR vendors were evaluated and compared, and the City selected as preferred option a Kubota KSP6 MBR system with parallel treatment trains, each capable of treating 0.25 MGD. A Cloacina MBR package system was the second closest option for the MBR system, as shown in the alternatives ranking for the different vendor options in Table 1.

Table 1. Alternatives Ranking Matrix
Vendor Alternatives Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Cloacina Kubota Ovivo
Criteria Weight Range Score Weighted
Score Score Weighted Score Score Weighted Score
Customizability 10%
1 - 3

3.0 0.30 2.0 0.20 1.0 0.10
Constructability 25% 2.0 0.50 3.0 0.75 1.0 0.25
Expandability 10% 2.0 0.20 3.0 0.30 1.0 0.10
Ease of O&M 20% 2.0 0.40 3.0 0.60 2.0 0.40
Experience and
Support 10% 3.0 0.30 2.0 0.20 1.0 0.10
Capital Cost 25% 3.0 0.75 3.0 0.75 1.0 0.25
Total 100% 2.5 2.8 1.2
Rank 2 1 3
Different locations at the WRF were evaluated for the feasibility of installing the new MBR system, and the preferred location selected was the empty lot area east of the existing WRF Administration building.

A preliminary MBR site layout for the Kubota system is shown in Figure 4.

During Phase 2 of the project, Kennedy Jenks will support the City with preparing an RFP package for vendor selection for the MBR system and develop the 30% design package for the MBR system. Phase 3 is envisioned to begin once an MBR vendor is selected to collaborate with the vendor to integrate their MBR design into the overall design package for the MBR project completing the 60%, 90% and final design for the MBR system. Early procurement of the MBR system vendor will provide design, cost and schedule certainty. Phase 4 is envisioned to begin once a contractor is selected for the project, to provide engineering services during construction and support with startup and commissioning of the MBR system.

Project Team
The proposed project team is illustrated in the organization chart in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Project Organization Chart
Proposed Scope of Work
The proposed scope of work is to provide a full design for the MBR system, including design plans and specifications suitable for bid, as well as providing support for the City for early procurement of the MBR package system and bid support for the overall project and contractor selection.

The proposed scope of work, described herein, includes the following tasks:

Phase 2:
• Task 1 – Project Management and Coordination (Phase 2) • Task 2 – Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection
• Task 3 – Field Investigations
• Task 4 – 30% Design
• Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report

Phase 3:
• Task 6 – Project Management and Coordination (Phase 3) • Task 7 – 60% Design
• Task 8 – 90% Design
• Task 9 – Final Design
• Task 10 – Bid Support Services
• Task 11 – As Needed Support
Phase 2: Preliminary Design
Task 1 – Project Management and Coordination
KJ will develop and implement the appropriate management procedures and actions to facilitate timely and cost-effective delivery of quality service and deliverables to the City for the Project. This includes project administration related to schedule, budget, and scope management, management of subconsultants, and communication of project activities with the City for Phase 2 under this task.

Task 1.1 – Project Management
This task addresses the management and administrative responsibilities associated with schedule, budget control, monthly invoice preparation, and project closeout. This phase of the work assumes an 8- month duration with submittal of eight (8) monthly invoices.

Task 1.2 – Project Meetings
The following meetings are assumed during Phase 2:
• Phase 2 Kick-off Meeting – Discuss information needs and schedule for Phase 2. This meeting will be conducted virtually and is assumed to be 1 hr in duration. • Progress Meetings – Check in calls with the City to provide updates on progress to date and overall project status, align schedule and provide budget updates. • Project Internal meetings – internal calls with the KJ design team and experts for coordination as needed on the design deliverables.
• Concept and Criteria Review Meeting – KJ will conduct an in-house C&CR meeting early in the Project to obtain focused technical input from senior KJ staff based on their experience from other similar projects. This process is a component of KJ’s quality control process and allows for senior staff to provide technical review and input into the design aspects of the project. It helps address opportunities for improvements to the design and address potential future challenges in detailed design activities.

All meetings will be held via webinar with video and desktop sharing, using the Microsoft Office 365 Teams environment. Invitees for the progress meetings will include personnel from the City, the KJ Project Manager, and as needed technical staff. KJ will prepare and distribute meeting agendas, materials, and succinct notes to document discussions, action items, and decisions.

Task 1 Deliverables:
• Eight (8) monthly invoices and progress reports (PDF) • Meeting agendas and minutes (Word or PDF)

Task 1 Assumptions:
• KJ’s schedule and fee are based on providing Phase 2 services for a period of eight (8) months • Schedule will depend on the completion of the MBR vendor pre-procurement process and alignment with RFP release and evaluation time required by the City (discussed in Task 2) • Up to 2 progress meetings assumed with the City, 1 hr in duration, attended virtually.

Task 2 – Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection
This task includes providing the City support preparing a request for proposals from MBR package plant vendors to pre-select the MBR package plant to be used for the project design.

A request for proposal (RFP) document would be prepared, including the 10% design drawings developed under previous Phase 1 and equipment performance specifications developed under this task to be used by the vendors for their proposal package responses. KJ will provide the City support to prepare a RFP for the package plant vendor selection, provide the MBR package plant performance specifications, answer questions during the RFP phase, and provide support as needed for the evaluation of the vendor proposals.

Materials developed for the RFP will include:
• The City’s standard RFP documents modified for equipment pre-selection. • 10% design drawings.
• Equipment performance specifications.

Benefits of formal pre-selection include:
• Achieves competitive pricing and detailed technical information to develop the 60% Design. • Vendor proposals may include a pre-negotiated price and pre-negotiated escalation to protect the City from future price increases beyond the agreed upon escalation index. • Selection of the vendor is based on defined scoring criteria such as cost and non-cost scoring criteria (best value selection).
• Pre-selected vendor contract is assigned to the contractor to purchase and install the equipment.

Task 2 Deliverables:
• Package plant pre-selection materials: RFP language, MBR package plan specifications (Word, PDF)
• Tables comparing the vendor proposals, if applicable (Xcel, PDF) Task 2 Assumptions:
• The City will consolidate the RFP for the City to review and release. The City will manage the procurement process once a Vendor is selected.
• The completion of the 30% design and DBM scoped under Tasks 4 and 5 will not depend on selection of a vendor.
• Design details for the package plant will be provided in the 60% design (Phase 3).

Task 3 – Field Investigations
This task will include conducting field investigations to support the development of the 30% design drawings and specifications. KJ will subcontract with a Survey Subconsultant (TOWILL) to conduct a topographic survey of the project area and a Geotech Subconsultant (ENGEO) to perform geotechnical field investigations. Potholing is not included as part of this task. Refinement of the survey and geotechnical scope can be initiated once a preferred alternative layout is selected.

Task 3.1 – Site Survey
KJ will coordinate with TOWILL to provide surveying services and develop a topographic map for the project area defined by survey limits established based on the selected location for the package treatment system and connections to the existing WRF facility, based on the 10% design drawings completed in Phase 1. The topographic survey will include the following:
• Horizontal Datum and Grid Projection – North American Datum of NAD 83, California Coordinate System of 1986 (CCS83), Zone III, 2011 (2017.5) epoch
• Vertical datum – North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) Survey scope includes an optional task for utility marking to locate with GPR and/or electro detection of existing utilities if required. Additional details for this site survey scope are included in Appendix A.

Task 3.2 – Geotechnical
KJ will coordinate with ENGEO to provide geotechnical engineering and recommendations for the design and construction of project and prepare a Draft Geotechnical Design Report. KJ will review and provide comments on the Draft Geotechnical Design Report prepared by ENGEO. Following a round of review comments, ENGEO will submit their Geotechnical Design Report to KJ. Additional details for this geotechnical scope are included in Appendix B.

Task 3.3 – Site Visit
This task includes one in-person site visit, following the Phase 2 kick-off meeting to confirm the alignments, extent of the preferred conceptual layout alternative, and refine the initial survey and geotechnical scope of work as-needed.

Task 3 Deliverables:
• Topographic survey data and documentation from the surveying firm (CAD files). • Geotechnical data and report from the geotechnical firm (Word, PDF).

Task 3 Assumptions:
• The scope of work assumesfield investigations will be conducted for the package plant location as selected for the 10% Design plans developed under Task 4. • Four (4) KJ staff will attend the site visit following the Phase 2 Kick-off Meeting, specifically design leads for Process, Mechanical and Civil disciplines.
• Potholing is not included under this task. Based on the survey results if additional utility investigations are needed, KJ will work with the City to develop a scope and fee as needed.

The survey and geotechnical information will be integrated into the 30% Design and DBM, as appropriate.

Task 4 – 30% Design
Starting with the 10% Design documents prepared under Phase 1, KJ will develop the 30% Design drawings showing the area where the MBR package plant will connect. The details of the MBR package plant will be provided by the selected vendor and incorporated during the 60% design phase.

Specifications and updated Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) for the 30% design level will also be developed for this task.

Task 4.1 – 30% Design Drawings
This task includes the following activities:
• Develop and submit 30% Design drawings for City review. • Prepare a comments response log to collect 30% design comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 7 under the 60% design.

The 30% Design drawings will not include detailed vendor design drawings but will provide delineations for the MBR package system boundaries and show the interconnections between the WRF and the package system.

The MBR design is anticipated to include the following components including modifications to the WRF as follows (see Figure 4):
• Existing Influent pump station to be modified to include grit removal and updates to the existing pump station to convert 2 of the existing pumps to be able to pump raw wastewater influent into the MBR system.
• At the MBR package plant site, the raw wastewater will be screened using fine screens and equalized before being pumped into the MBR package system for treatment, followed by UV disinfection and transfer pumps that will convey the disinfected effluent to the existing recycled water storage wet well.
• The MBR package plant will include an odor control system, a building for housing the blowers and electrical equipment, chemical dosing system under a canopy, and a concrete pad where the MBR package system will be placed at.
• The MBR Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) will be pumped to a new sludge holding tank and screw press to be located at the WRF adjacent to the solids handling building.

A summary of the proposed drawing sheets to be prepared at 30%, 60%, 90% and final design is included in Appendix C.

Task 4.2 – 30% Specifications
KJ will prepare the 30% design level specifications for the main equipment for City review.

This task includes the following activities:
• Develop 30% design equipment specifications.
• Prepare a comments response log to collect 30% specification comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 7 under the 60% design.

A summary of the proposed specifications to be prepared at 30%, 60%, 90% and final design is included in Appendix D.

Task 4.3 – 30% Cost Estimate
This task includes preparation of the basis of estimate based on the 30% Design drawings for a Class 3 OPCC in accordance with AACE Cost classification level (see Table 2). The OPCC will include the cost for the MBR package plant based on the vendor proposal from Phase 1 and adjusted if feasible with input received from the vendors for the pre selection process during Task 2. Preliminary operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for the treatment facility will also be developed.

Table 2. Cost Estimate Classification Levels
This task includes the following activities:
• Prepare a Class 3 OPCC and O&M costs for the project, including MBR package plant costs based on the RFP responses and selected vendor from Task 2.
• Submit draft Class 3 OPCC for City review.
• Prepare a comments response log to collect Class 3 OPCC comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 7 under the 60% design.

Task 4.4 – 30% Design Workshop
This task includes conducting a 30% Design Workshop, a 2-hour to review the 30% Design and OPCC. KJ will develop a workshop agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and develop meeting minutes. Up to six (6) KJ staff will attend and the workshop.

Task 4 Deliverables:
• 30% Design drawings (PDF)
• 30% Design specifications (Word)
• OPCC (Class 3), O&M costs based on 30% Design documents (Xcel, PDF) • 30% Design Review Comments log (Xcel, PDF)
• 30% Design Workshop agenda, materials, and meeting notes (PDF) Task 4 Assumptions:
• Drawings to be prepared for the 30% design are summarized in Appendix C

• Specifications to be prepared for the 30% design are summarized in Appendix D • Cost Estimate will be prepared to Class 3 level
• Design workshop will be conducted virtually and be 2 hours in duration • Upon vendor selection, MBR package drawings would be provided for the Phase 3 60% design, which is not part of this Phase 2 scope of work.

Task 5 – Design Basis Memorandum (DBM)
A succinct Draft DBM will summarize the design criteria for the 30% design and design considerations for the project.

Task 5.1 – Draft DBM
The Draft DBM will include design criteria, 30% Drawings, and Class 3 OPCC for the preferred package plant location identified in Phase 1.

The DBM will document and include code review for the package plant and ancillary project elements in compliance with:
• California Building Code (CBC), current edition
• California Plumbing Code (CPC), current edition
• California Fire Code (CFC), current edition
• California Mechanical Code (CMC), current edition
• National Electrical Code (NEC), current edition
• NFPA 820: Standards for fire [protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities • Cal-OSHA
• State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Construction General permit (CGP) • California Air Resources Control Board (CARB, if needed) • Other local ordinances
Task 5.2 – Final DBM
A Final DBM will be prepared based on the comments received from the City on the Draft DBM.

Task 5 Deliverables:
• Draft DBM (Word, PDF)
• Final DBM (Word, PDF)
Task 5 Assumptions:
• City will provide one set of consolidated comments in track changes/embedded comments in the Word document within three (3) weeks of the Draft DBM submittal. • KJ will discuss refinements to the process design criteria with City and WRF staff during the monthly progress meetings.

Phase 3: Design and Bid
Task 6 – Project Management and Coordination
KJ will provide project administration related to schedule, budget, and scope management, management of subconsultants, and communication of project activities with the City for Phase 3 under this task.

Task 6.1 – Project Management
This task addresses the management and administrative responsibilities associated with schedule, budget control, monthly invoice preparation, and project closeout. This phase of the work assumes a 12- month duration with submittal of twelve (12) monthly invoices.

Task 6.2 – Project Meetings
The following meetings are assumed during Phase 3:
• Phase 2 Kick-off Meeting – Discuss information needs and schedule for Phase 3. This meeting will be conducted virtually and is assumed to be 1 hr in duration. • Progress Meetings – Regular check in calls with the City to provide updates on progress to date and overall project status, align schedule and provide budget updates. • Project Internal meetings – internal calls with KJ design team and experts for coordination as needed on the design deliverables.

All meetings will be held via webinar with video and desktop sharing, using the Microsoft Office 365 Teams environment. Invitees for the progress meetings will include personnel from the City, the KJ Project Manager, and as needed technical staff. KJ will prepare and distribute meeting agendas, materials, and succinct notes to document discussions, action items, and decisions.

Task 6 Deliverables:
• Twelve (12) monthly invoices and progress reports (PDF) • Meeting agendas and minutes (Word or PDF)
Task 6 Assumptions:
• KJ’s schedule and fee are based on providing Phase 3 services for a period of Twelve (12) months • Up to 3 progress meetings assumed with the City, 1 hr in duration, attended virtually.

Task 7 – 60% Design
Starting with the 30% Design documents prepared under Phase 2, KJ will develop the 60% Design drawings and incorporate the details of the MBR package plant provided by the selected vendor.

Specifications and updated Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) for the 60% design level will also be developed for this task.

Task 7.1 – 60% Design Drawings
This task includes the following activities:
• Develop and submit 60% Design drawings for City review.

• Prepare a comments response log to collect 60% design comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 8 under the 90% design.

The 60% Design drawings will include detailed vendor design drawings.

Task 7.2 – 60% Specifications
KJ will prepare the 60% design level specifications for the main equipment. Division 0 specs will follow City standards.

This task includes the following activities:
• Develop 60% design equipment specifications.
• Prepare a comments response log to collect 60% specification comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 8 under the 90% design.

Task 7.3 – 60% Cost Estimate
This task includes updating the cost estimate for the 60% Design drawings to a Class 3 OPCC based on AACE Cost classification level (see Table 2). The OPCC will include refined cost for the MBR package plant as provided by the selected vendor. O&M costs for the treatment facility will also be updated.

This task includes the following activities:
• Prepare a Class 3 OPCC and O&M costs for the project
• Submit draft Class 3 OPCC for City review.
• Prepare a comments response log for addressing Class 3 OPCC, to be incorporated in task 8 under the 90% design
Task 7.4 – 60% Design Workshop
This task includes conducting a 60% Design Workshop, a 2-hour to review the 60% Design and OPCC. KJ will develop a workshop agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and develop meeting minutes. Up to six (6) KJ staff will attend and the workshop.

Task 7 Deliverables:
• 60% Design drawings (PDF)
• 60% Design specifications (Word)
• OPCC (Class 3), O&M costs (Xcel, PDF)
• 60% Design Review Comments log (Xcel, PDF)
• 60% Design Workshop agenda, materials, and meeting notes (PDF) Task 7 Assumptions:
• Drawings to be prepared for the 60% design are summarized in Appendix C • Specifications to be prepared for the 60% design are summarized in Appendix D • Cost Estimate will be prepared to Class 3 level
• Design workshop will be conducted virtually and be 2 hours in duration

Task 8 – 90% Design
KJ will develop the 90% Design drawings, specifications and updated OPCC including comments resolution from the 60% design.

Task 8.1 – 90% Design Drawings
This task includes the following activities:
• Develop and submit 90% Design drawings for City review. • Prepare a comments response log to collect 90% design comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 9 under the 100% design.

The 90% Design drawings will include updated vendor design drawings.

Task 8.2 – 90% Specifications
KJ will prepare the 90% design level specifications for the main equipment. Division 0 specs will follow City standards.

This task includes the following activities:
• Develop 90% design equipment specifications.
• Prepare a comments response log to collect 90% specification comments from the City. Responses will be prepared and incorporated during Task 9 under the 100% design.

Task 8.3 – 90% Cost Estimate
This task includes updating the cost estimate based on the 90% Design drawings to a Class 2 OPCC based on AACE Cost classification level (see Table 2). The OPCC will include refined cost for the MBR package plant as provided by the selected vendor. O&M costs for the treatment facility will also be updated.

This task includes the following activities:
• Prepare a Class 2 OPCC and O&M costs for the project
• Submit draft Class 2 OPCC for City review.
• Prepare a comments response log for addressing Class 2 OPCC, to be incorporated in task 9 under the final design
Task 8.4 – 90% Design Workshop
This task includes conducting a 90% Design Workshop, a 2-hour to review the 90% Design and OPCC. KJ will develop a workshop agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and develop meeting minutes. Up to six (6) KJ staff will attend and the workshop.

Task 8 Deliverables:
• 90% Design drawings (PDF)
• 90% Design specifications (Word)
• OPCC (Class 2), O&M costs (Xcel, PDF)
• 90% Design Review Comments log (Xcel, PDF)
• 90% Design Workshop agenda, materials, and meeting notes (PDF)

Task 8 Assumptions:
• Drawings to be prepared for the 90% design are summarized in Appendix C • Specifications to be prepared for the 90% design are summarized in Appendix D • Cost Estimate will be prepared to Class 2 level
• Design workshop will be conducted virtually and be 2 hours in duration Task 9 – Final Design
KJ will develop the Final Design drawings, specifications and updated OPCC including comments resolution from the 90% design.

Task 9.1 – 100% Design Drawings
This task includes the following activities:
• Develop and submit 100% Design drawings for City review. • Review comments from the City and incorporate into FINAL stamped and signed design drawings.

The 100% Design drawings will include the final vendor design drawings.

Task 9.2 – 100% Specifications
KJ will prepare the 100% design level specifications for the project.

This task includes the following activities:
• Develop 100% design specifications and submit for City review. • Review comments from the City and incorporate into FINAL stamped and signed design specifications.

Task 9.3 – 100% Cost Estimate
This task includes refining the cost estimate based on the Final Design drawings at a Class 2 OPCC based on AACE Cost classification level (see Table 2). The OPCC will include the final cost for the MBR package plant as provided by the selected vendor. O&M costs for the treatment facility will also be updated.

This task includes the following activities:
• Update Class 2 OPCC and O&M costs for the project
• Submit final Class 2 OPCC cost.

Task 9.4 – 100% Design Workshop
This task includes conducting a 100% Design Workshop, a 2-hour to review the Final Design and OPCC.

KJ will develop a workshop agenda, PowerPoint presentation, and develop meeting minutes. Up to six (6) KJ staff will attend and the workshop.

Task 9 Deliverables:
• 100% Final Design drawings (PDF, CAD)
• 100% Final Design specifications (Word, PDF)
• Final OPCC (Class 2), O&M costs (Xcel, PDF)
• 100% Design Workshop agenda, materials, and meeting notes (PDF)

Task 9 Assumptions:
• Drawings to be prepared for the 100% design are summarized in Appendix C • Specifications to be prepared for the 100% design are summarized in Appendix D • Cost Estimate will be Class 2 level
• Design workshop will be conducted virtually and be 2 hours in duration Task 10 – Bid Support Services
KJ will provide support for the City for the project Bid, preparing conformed documents and providing responses to RFIs.

Task 10.1 – Conformed Drawings and Specifications
This task includes preparing and submit Conformed drawings and specifications Task 10.2 – Bid Site Walk
This task assumes attendance by the Project Manager and Design Manager during the Bid site walk to support Bidders with answering questions.

Task 10.3 – RFI Responses
This task assumes an allowance of 60 hours for the project design team to prepare addenda based on received RFIs and responses agreed upon with the City.

Task 10.4 – Bid Support
This task assumes an allowance of 14 hours for the project team to support the City with evaluation of the proposals and comparison of Bid results
Task 10 Deliverables:
• Conformed drawings and specifications (PDF)
• RFI responses (Word, PDF)
Task 10 Assumptions:
• An allowance of 60 hours is assumed to support the City with RFI responses and addenda • Attendance to 1 bid site walk by up to 2 KJ staff
• An allowance of 14 hours is assumed for the project team to support the City with Bid review Task 11 – As needed support
This task assumes an allowance of $40,000 for any additional services provided by KJ as requested and approved by the City. Additional services can include:
• Additional project meetings or design review workshops • Additional site visits or investigations required for the design development • Changes to design assumptions or scope that require additional design drawings, specifications or modifications to the Preliminary Design Report
• Additional coordination required by the City for the Vendor procurement and selection process • Additional support required by the City for the Bid and award process • Extended project schedule and duration

This task also includes an allowance for an optional task for surveyor for utility marking to locate with GPR and/or electro detection of existing utilities if required.

Proposed Schedule
This proposal assumes the scope of services for Phase 2 will be completed in 8 months from receipt of the Notice to Proceed and services for Phase 3 will be complete in 12 months from initiation of Phase 3 activities. A potential project schedule is shown in Figure 6. Adhering to the anticipated notice to proceed date, meeting dates, and review times will be critical to achieving the design schedule presented below.

Figure 6. Anticipated Design Schedule Phase 2 and Phase 3 SVWD WWTP Master Plan Schedule
Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Notice to Proceed Phase 2 
Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination

1.1 - Project Management

1.2 - Project Meetings Kickoff / /
Task 2 - Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection

2.1 - MBR Preselection
Task 3 - Field Investigations

3.1 - Site Survey ✓

3.2 - Geotechnical Study u ✓

3.3 - Site Visit ●
Task 4 - 30% Design

4.1 - 30% Design Drawings u

4.2 - 30% Specifications u

4.3 - 30% Cost Estimate u

4.4 - 30% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) W#1
Task 5 - Design Basis Memorandum

5.1 - DRAFT Report u

5.2 -Final Report ✓
Notice to Proceed Phase 3 
Task 6 - Project Management and Coordination

6.1 - Project Management

6.2 - Project Meetings Kickoff / / /
Task 7 - 60% Design

7.1 - 60% Design Drawings u

7.2 - 60% Specifications u

7.3 - 60% Cost Estimate u

7.4 - 60% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) W#2
Task 8 - 90% Design

8.1 - 90% Design Drawings u

8.2 - 90% Specifications u

8.3 - 90% Cost Estimate u

8.4 - 90% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) W#3
Task 9 - Final Design

9.1 - 100% Design Drawings u ✓

9.2 - 100% Specifications u ✓

9.3 - 100% Cost Estimate u ✓

9.4 - 100% Design Workshop (1 hr, virtual) W#4
Task 10 - Bid Support Services

10.1 - Conformed Drawings & Specifications ✓

10.2 - Bid Site Walk ✓

10.3 - RFI Responses

10.4 - Bid Support ✓
Task 11 - As Needed Support
Total Project
Meetings Deliverables
Workshops W# Draft u
Progress Meetings / Final ✓
Site Visit ●
Phase 3
2027
~ 20 months
City of Scotts Valley WWTP Master Plan
LEGEND
Phase 2
2026 2026

Proposed Fee
The proposed fee is summarized in Table 3, with a detailed breakdown of Phase 2 and 3 hours by subtask provided in Table 4.

Table 3. Proposed Fee Summary
Project Tasks Total
Hours
Total KJ Labor Total Subs Total
Expenses
Total Labor +
Subs + Expenses
Phase 2
Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination 180 $ 49,645 $ - $ - $ 49,645 Task 2 - Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection 90 $ 24,860 $ - $ - $ 24,860 Task 3 - Field Investigations 60 $ 16,840 $ 114,294 $ 1,375 $ 132,509 Task 4 - 30% Design 1230 $ 312,855 $ - $ - $ 312,855
Task 5 - Design Basis Memorandum 200 $ 51,410 $ - $ - $ 51,410 Total Phase 2 ( Tasks 1 - 5) 1760 $ 455,610 $ 114,294 $ 1,375 $ 571,279 Phase 3
Task 6 - Project Management and Coordination 320 $ 89,085 $ - $ - $ 89,085 Task 7 - 60% Design 2690 $ 689,340 $ - $ - $ 689,340
Task 8 - 90% Design 2600 $ 685,264 $ - $ - $ 685,264
Task 9 - Final Design 770 $ 202,704 $ - $ - $ 202,704
Task 10 - Bid Support Services 130 $ 35,638 $ - $ 275 $ 35,913 Task 11 - As Needed Support 0 $ 40,000 $ 16,500 $ - $ 56,500 Total Phase 3 (Tasks 6 to 11) 6510 $ 1,742,031 $ 16,500 $ 275 $ 1,758,806 Total Phase 2 & 3 (tasks 1 to 11) 8270 $ 2,197,641 $ 130,794 $ 1,650 $ 2,330,086 Page 165 of 570 Table 4. Detailed Phase 2 and 3 Fee Estimate
Exhibit A: Proposal Fee Estimate
CLIENT Name:

PROJECT Description: MBR Design (Complete Design)
Proposal/Job Number: Date: 3/16/2026
January 1, 2025 Rates QA/QC QA/QC Design manager QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC PM Tech lead Tech lead Tech lead Cost Tech lead Tech lead Tech lead I&C Elec Process Civil CAD CAD CAD CAD CAD KJ KJ Sub Sub KJ KJ KJ Total Labor + Subs + Expenses City of Scotts Valley
Classification: Eng-Sci-8 Don Ervin (Civil) Eng-Sci-8 David S (Process) Eng-Sci-8 Byron N (Process) Eng-Sci-8 Sanki N (I&C) Eng-Sci-8 Zach D (Electrical) Eng-Sci-8 PJ (structural) Eng-Sci-7 Zach Harris (bldg ) Eng-Sci-7 Mark P (Architect) Eng-Sci-6 Claudia L Eng-Sci-7 Jeremiah M (Process/Mech) Eng-Sci-6 Brittany Mahoney (Architect) Eng-Sci-6 Andrew Gudal (I&C) Eng-Sci-6 Kieran (Cost) Eng-Sci-5 Jon M (Electrical) Eng-Sci-6 Patrick Tran (Civil) Eng-Sci-5 Faiyaz (Structural) Eng-Sci-4 Ricardo Mejia (I&C) Eng-Sci-3 Vitaliy Z (electrical) Eng-Sci-3 Drajhan (Process) Eng-Sci-2 Jodi (bldg/Civil) Eng-Sci-2 Nicholas Santamaria (I&C) Sr CAD- Designer CAD- Designer Sr CAD- Technician CAD- Technician Project Assistant Total Labor Escalation Survey Geotech Sub-Markup ODCs ODCs Markup Total Labor Total Subs Total Expenses Total Labor + Subs + Expenses Total Labor Total Subs Total Expenses Hourly Rate: $340 $340 $340 $340 $340 $340 $315 $315 $290 $315 $290 $290 $290 $270 $290 $270 $250 $230 $230 $200 $200 $210 $200 $195 $180 $145 Hours Fees 3% Fees Fees 10% Fees 10% Fees $0 $0 $0
Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination

1.1 - Project Management
Project Setup, Work plan, Closeout, H&S plan 4 4 4 12 $3,100 $0 $0 $3,100 $0 $0 $3,100 Monthly Reports and Invoicing (8 months, monthtly) 16 8 24 $5,800 $0 $0 $5,800 $0 $0 $5,800

1.2 - Project Meetings
Kickoff Meeting (1hr, virtual) 1 2 2 2 7 $2,060 $0 $0 $2,060 $0 $0 $2,060 Progress Meetings (up tp 2, 1 hr duration, virtual) 2 2 $580 $0 $0 $580 $0 $0 $580 Project Internal Meetings (biweekly, 1hr, virtual) 4 4 16 2 2 2 2 2 16 8 2 6 6 6 6 8 8 16 8 124 $35,040 $0 $0 $35,040 $0 $0 $35,040 C&CR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 11 $3,065 $0 $0 $3,065 $0 $0 $3,065 Task 1 - Subtotal 6 5 23 2 2 2 2 2 41 9 2 7 0 6 7 6 8 9 19 10 0 0 0 0 0 12 180 $49,645 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,645 $0 $0 $49,645 Task 2 - Package Plant Vendor Pre-Selection

2.1 - MBR Preselection
Prepare RFP 2 8 8 4 16 2 40 $10,950 $0 $0 $10,950 $0 $0 $10,950 Prepare MBR vendor specifications 2 8 2 2 4 4 4 12 2 40 $11,050 $0 $0 $11,050 $0 $0 $11,050 Review RFIs and support City with vendor selection 4 2 4 10 $2,860 $0 $0 $2,860 $0 $0 $2,860 Task 2 - Subtotal 2 2 20 2 0 0 0 0 12 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 90 $24,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,860 $0 $0 $24,860 Task 3 - Field Investigations

3.1 - Site Survey 1 8 8 17 $4,170 $33,904 $3,390 $0 $4,170 $37,294 $0 $41,464

3.2 - Geotechnical Study 4 1 6 11 $3,270 $70,000 $7,000 $0 $3,270 $77,000 $0 $80,270

3.3 - Site Visit 8 8 8 8 32 $9,400 $0 $1,250 $125 $9,400 $0 $1,375 $10,775 Task 3 - Subtotal 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 16 6 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 60 $16,840 $0 $33,904 $70,000 $10,390 $1,250 $125 $16,840 $114,294 $1,375 $132,509 Task 4 - 30% Design

4.1 - 30% Design Drawings 43 7 54 17 15 7 15 6 8 81 20 17 0 65 17 48 50 119 122 44 70 49 56 144 1074 $269,540 $0 $0 $269,540 $0 $0 $269,540

4.2 - 30% Specifications 2 6 2 1 1 4 2 9 2 5 3 2 1 13 3 16 4 76 $20,695 $0 $0 $20,695 $0 $0 $20,695

4.3 - 30% Cost Estimate 4 4 40 6 54 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500

4.4 - 30% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) 4 4 4 4 6 4 26 $7,120 $0 $0 $7,120 $0 $0 $7,120 Task 4 - Subtotal 45 7 68 19 16 8 19 8 16 94 22 26 40 68 19 49 63 122 150 48 70 49 56 144 0 4 1230 $312,855 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $312,855 $0 $0 $312,855 Task 5 - Design Basis Memorandum

5.1 - DRAFT Report 6 8 2 2 4 4 2 8 16 4 6 4 6 6 8 8 36 36 4 170 $43,970 $0 $0 $43,970 $0 $0 $43,970

5.2 -Final Report 2 4 2 4 6 8 4 30 $7,440 $0 $0 $7,440 $0 $0 $7,440 Task 5 - Subtotal 8 0 12 2 2 4 4 2 10 20 4 6 0 4 6 6 8 8 42 44 0 0 0 0 0 8 200 $51,410 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,410 $0 $0 $51,410 Total Phase 2 ( Tasks 1 - 5) 61 14 131 25 20 18 25 12 81 139 28 43 40 78 48 67 79 143 251 102 70 49 56 152 0 28 1760 $ 455,610 $ - $ 33,904 $ 70,000 $ 10,390 $1,250 $125 $ 455,610 $ 114,294 $ 1,375 $ 571,279 Page 166 of 570 Exhibit A: Proposal Fee Estimate
CLIENT Name:

PROJECT Description: MBR Design (Complete Design)
Proposal/Job Number: Date: 3/16/2026
January 1, 2025 Rates QA/QC QA/QC Design manager QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC QA/QC PM Tech lead Tech lead Tech lead Cost Tech lead Tech lead Tech lead I&C Elec Process Civil CAD CAD CAD CAD CAD KJ KJ Sub Sub KJ KJ KJ Total Labor + Subs + Expenses City of Scotts Valley
Classification: Eng-Sci-8 Don Ervin (Civil) Eng-Sci-8 David S (Process) Eng-Sci-8 Byron N (Process) Eng-Sci-8 Sanki N (I&C) Eng-Sci-8 Zach D (Electrical) Eng-Sci-8 PJ (structural) Eng-Sci-7 Zach Harris (bldg ) Eng-Sci-7 Mark P (Architect) Eng-Sci-6 Claudia L Eng-Sci-7 Jeremiah M (Process/Mech) Eng-Sci-6 Brittany Mahoney (Architect) Eng-Sci-6 Andrew Gudal (I&C) Eng-Sci-6 Kieran (Cost) Eng-Sci-5 Jon M (Electrical) Eng-Sci-6 Patrick Tran (Civil) Eng-Sci-5 Faiyaz (Structural) Eng-Sci-4 Ricardo Mejia (I&C) Eng-Sci-3 Vitaliy Z (electrical) Eng-Sci-3 Drajhan (Process) Eng-Sci-2 Jodi (bldg/Civil) Eng-Sci-2 Nicholas Santamaria (I&C) Sr CAD- Designer CAD- Designer Sr CAD- Technician CAD- Technician Project Assistant Total Labor Escalation Survey Geotech Sub-Markup ODCs ODCs Markup Total Labor Total Subs Total Expenses Total Labor + Subs + Expenses Total Labor Total Subs Total Expenses Hourly Rate: $340 $340 $340 $340 $340 $340 $315 $315 $290 $315 $290 $290 $290 $270 $290 $270 $250 $230 $230 $200 $200 $210 $200 $195 $180 $145 Hours Fees 3% Fees Fees 10% Fees 10% Fees $0 $0 $0
Task 6 - Project Management and Coordination

6.1 - Project Management
Project Setup, Work plan, Closeout, H&S plan 4 4 4 12 $3,100 $0 $0 $3,100 $0 $0 $3,100 Monthly Reports and Invoicing (12 months, monthtly) 24 12 36 $8,700 $0 $0 $8,700 $0 $0 $8,700

6.2 - Project Meetings
Kickoff Meeting (1hr, virtual) 1 2 2 1 2 1 9 $2,575 $0 $0 $2,575 $0 $0 $2,575 Progress Meetings (up tp 3, 1hr, virtual) 3 3 $870 $0 $0 $870 $0 $0 $870 Project Internal Meetings (biweekly, 1hr, virtual) 12 24 8 8 8 8 8 24 24 12 12 4 8 12 12 12 12 24 16 12 260 $73,840 $0 $0 $73,840 $0 $0 $73,840 Task 6 - Subtotal 13 0 30 8 8 8 8 8 57 25 12 12 4 8 12 12 12 12 26 17 12 0 0 0 0 16 320 $89,085 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,085 $0 $0 $89,085 Task 7 - 60% Design

7.1 - 60% Design Drawings 75 12 95 29 27 13 27 10 6 141 35 30 114 30 84 88 208 214 77 123 86 98 252 1874 $470,020 $0 $0 $470,020 $0 $0 $470,020

7.2 - 60% Specifications 18 50 21 5 7 34 14 80 20 46 26 20 12 110 21 148 98 6 736 $196,700 $0 $0 $196,700 $0 $0 $196,700

7.3 - 60% Cost Estimate 4 4 40 6 54 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500

7.4 - 60% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) 4 4 4 4 6 4 26 $7,120 $0 $0 $7,120 $0 $0 $7,120 Task 7 - Subtotal 93 12 153 50 32 20 61 24 14 225 55 80 40 140 50 96 198 229 374 179 123 86 98 252 0 6 2690 $689,340 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $689,340 $0 $0 $689,340 Task 8 - 90% Design

8.1 - 90% Design Drawings 75 12 95 29 27 13 27 10 8 141 35 30 114 30 84 88 208 214 77 123 86 98 252 1876 $470,600 $14,118 $0 $0 $484,718 $0 $0 $484,718

8.2 - 90% Specifications 16 45 18 5 6 30 12 71 18 41 23 18 10 100 21 131 83 6 654 $174,865 $5,246 $0 $0 $180,111 $0 $0 $180,111

8.3 - 90% Cost Estimate 4 4 32 4 44 $12,720 $382 $0 $0 $13,102 $0 $0 $13,102

8.4 - 90% Design Workshop (2 hr, virtual) 4 4 4 4 6 4 26 $7,120 $214 $0 $0 $7,334 $0 $0 $7,334 Task 8 - Subtotal 91 12 148 47 32 19 57 22 16 216 53 75 32 137 48 94 188 229 355 164 123 86 98 252 0 6 2600 $665,305 $19,959 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $685,264 $0 $0 $685,264 Task 9 - Final Design

9.1 - 100% Design Drawings 21 4 27 8 8 4 8 3 4 40 10 9 0 33 9 24 25 60 60 22 35 25 28 72 0 0 539 $135,355 $4,061 $0 $0 $139,416 $0 $0 $139,416

9.2 - 100% Specifications 4 0 11 5 1 2 8 3 0 18 5 10 0 6 4 3 25 5 33 22 0 0 0 0 0 8 173 $45,445 $1,363 $0 $0 $46,808 $0 $0 $46,808

9.3 - 100% Cost Estimate 4 4 16 4 4 32 $8,880 $266 $0 $0 $9,146 $0 $0 $9,146

9.4 - 100% Design Workshop (1 hr, virtual) 4 4 4 4 6 4 26 $7,120 $214 $0 $0 $7,334 $0 $0 $7,334 Task 9 - Subtotal 25 4 46 13 9 6 16 6 12 62 15 23 16 39 13 27 50 65 103 52 35 25 28 72 0 8 770 $196,800 $5,904 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $202,704 $0 $0 $202,704 Task 10 - Bid Support Services

10.1 - Conformed Drawings & Specifications 4 4 8 16 8 40 $10,320 $310 $0 $0 $10,630 $0 $0 $10,630

10.2 - Bid Site Walk 8 8 16 $5,040 $151 $0 $250 $25 $5,191 $0 $275 $5,466

10.3 - RFI Responses 8 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 6 8 8 60 $15,340 $460 $0 $0 $15,800 $0 $0 $15,800

10.4 - Bid Support 4 4 6 14 $3,900 $117 $0 $0 $4,017 $0 $0 $4,017 Task 10 - Subtotal 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 18 16 0 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 30 6 0 8 16 0 0 0 130 $34,600 $1,038 $0 $0 $0 $250 $25 $35,638 $0 $275 $35,913 Task 11 - As Needed Support

11.1 - As needed services 0 $40,000 $15,000 $1,500 $0 $40,000 $16,500 $0 $56,500 Task 10 - Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $40,000 $0 $15,000 $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $40,000 $16,500 $0 $56,500 hidden line - task groups end
Total Phase 3 (Tasks 6 to 11) 222 28 401 118 81 53 142 60 117 544 135 192 92 326 125 231 450 537 888 418 293 205 240 576 0 36 6510 $ 1,715,130 $ 26,901 $ 15,000 $ - $ 1,500 $ 250 $ 25 $ 1,742,031 $ 16,500 $ 275 $1,758,806 Total Phase 2 & 3 (Tasks 16 to 11) 283 42 532 143 101 71 167 72 198 683 163 235 132 404 173 298 529 680 1139 520 363 254 296 728 0 64 8270 $ 2,170,740 $ 26,901 $ 48,904 $ 70,000 $ 11,890 $1,500 $150 $ 2,197,641 $ 130,794 $ 1,650 $2,330,086 Page 167 of 570 Appendix A
Site Survey Proposal

Towill, Inc. ● 2300 Clayton Road ● Suite 1200 ● Concord ● California ● 94520-2176 ● 925.682.6976 ● 925.682.6390 fax www.towill.com
January 26, 2026 (Rev 1/30/2026)
Claudia Llerandi, PE
Kennedy Jenks
2121 N. California Blvd, STE 810
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Direct: (415) 243.2506
[email protected]
Re: Survey Support Services
Scotts Valley Wastewater treatment site, 700 Lundy Lane, Scotts Valley, CA, Dear Ms Llerandi,
Thank you for choosing Towill, Inc. to compile and submit the proposal for Survey Support services. In the following sections, we outline our comprehensive understanding of the project, present the proposed scope of work, and provide an estimate for the associated costs.

THE PROJECT
The project involves survey support for the topographic surveys at the location, as indicated in Exhibit A, located in Scotts Valley, CA.

SCOPE OF SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES
Task One—Survey Support for Scotts Valley WWTP

1.1General
Towill will provide the following services:
• Coordinate with Kennedy Jenks for the duration of the project, see anticipated schedule below.
• Provide land surveying services, which shall be dated, signed, and sealed by a professional surveyor (John T. May, PLS) in accordance with prime contract/scope requirements.
• Establish or tie-in to project control network.
o Horizontal Datum and Grid Projection – North American Datum of NAD 83 (NAD83), California Coordinate System of 1983 (CCS83), Zone III, 2011 (2017.5) epoch
o Vertical Datum – North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88)

1.2 Topographic Survey
Towill will conduct a field survey to collect topographic data to support design at the waste water treatment plant. Collected features will be visible (at the time of our field survey) • Hardscape and softscape including gradebreaks, high points, and low points • Identify material of hardscape and softscape
• Sanitary and storm surface features including, but not limited to manholes, catch basins, cleanouts, culverts, and headwalls.

• Provide rim and grate elevations, pipe inverts, size, and material. Locate the next manhole or catch basin up or down stream of storm or sanitary sewer pipes extending beyond the survey/property line such that pipe slope can be determined. • Surface features such as valves, meters, boxes, vaults, fire hydrants, utility appurtenances, point of connections, and outfalls.
• Overhead electrical lines, including approximate height of lines, and guy wires. • Fencing, gates, barriers, signs, bollards (permanent, and removable), signs, light poles, driveways, striping, wheel stops, and trees (size, species, and drip lines). • Buildings, walls, structures, and equipment pads including finished floor elevations, doors, ramps, extent of awnings or overhangs, if applicable, bottom and top of wall, and top of equipment pad(s).

Optional Task:

Utility Marking company to locate with GPR and/or electro detection of existing underground utilities, mark on ground with paint or flags indicated type and depth. Towill will collect this data and incorporate into topographic deliverables.

Task One Deliverables
• ACAD Civil 3D file (2022 Version), with surface
• Control Report
• Pdf of topographic basemap (sheets)
• Dipsheets of Sanitary/Storm Drainage Structures
• Site Photos
• ASCII file (Point numbers, northing, easting, elevation and description)

SCHEDULE
Topographic surveys can be conducted with weeks of 2 NTP and final deliverables within 3 weeks of successful completion and collection of the field data.

ASSUMPTIONS, SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS
Any work above and beyond the described scope above will be negotiated separately and billed on a time-and-materials basis per Towill’s contract rate schedule. For clarification, our proposed technical approach assumes the following:
• Access to the site and notification of entry will be provided by others. • Services other than those specifically described herein are not currently proposed. • Our proposal does not include payment of any fees, permits, or other items not specifically mentioned in our scope of work. Such fees, if applicable, will be invoiced as additional costs.
• No encroachment permits are anticipated for this effort. • No traffic control is anticipated for this effort.
• Travel time is included in this estimate.
• Weekends, and overtime are included in this estimate. • Night and Holidays are not included in this estimate. • No staking of right-of-way, easements, or boundaries is included in this estimate.

• Towill will receive all digital files in a timely manner to keep the project on track. If additional information is needed to complete a task Towill will notify Kennedy Jenks immediately.
• Additional time spent gathering necessary information needed to complete a task will be bill at a time and materials basis per contract rate. • The Scope of Services outlined in this proposal are based on facts known at the time of submission, including, if applicable, information supplied by the Client. For some projects, the scope and level of required effort may not be fully definable during the initial phases. As the project progresses, facts discovered may indicate that the scope must be redefined. Towill will promptly provide Client with an amendment to this proposal/agreement to recognize such changes, which shall be deemed approved if not objected to within 15 days of receipt by the Client.

SUMMARIZED COST
Our proposed cost for the work described above is as follows and is based on our current contract rate schedule at a time-and-materials cost; see attached Exhibit C. This is an estimate of work, and factors such as site schedule, work requirements, and other considerations may affect this price. Please see Exhibit B for a full breakdown of hours anticipated for this project.

Items Task Fee
Towill Topographic Survey $33,904
Optional Mark and Locate $15,000
Thank you for this opportunity, and we look forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, or if, for any reason, it does not meet your budget or time constraints, please contact me to discuss options to revise the proposal to better suit your needs. I can be reached by phone at (925) 682-6976 ext. 1032 or by email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
TOWILL, INC.

John T. May, PLS
Project Manager

Exhibit A

Limits of Site in Red

KJ-Scotts Valley
PERSONNEL Principal Surveyor Senior PM / LS Survey PM / LS Project Surveyor / LS Associate Surveyor / LSIT Survey Tech CADD Tech 1 Man Crew 1 Man Crew OT 2 Man Crew 2 Man Crew OT Tot Hrs TOTALS Hourly Rates $275.00 $257.00 $225.00 $200.00 $184.00 $157.00 $124.00 $200.00 $300.00 $360.00 $540.00 TRAVEL TIME / PER CREW MEMBER Ken Frank/John Menashe/ John H Matt/John G/Touko/Angela Kristine / Ivan / Kim / Kat/ Maceo / Jeff Nguyen / Max / Tom Intern Start Up & Coordination
Start Up & Coordination 1 1 2 hrs $482.00 $482.00Topographic and Utility SurveyField Mobilizations 4 2 8 2 40 56 hrs $17,614.00Office Deliverables 4 4 5 70 83 hrs $15,808.00 Topographic and Utility Survey $33,422.00
Project Total
$33,904.00
TOTAL HOURS 0 9 5 7 78 2 0 0 0 40 0 141 $33,904.00 TOTAL COST $0.00 $2,313.00 $1,125.00 $1,400.00 $14,352.00 $314.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,400.00 $0.00 $33,904.00 $33,904.00TOTAL DAYS BY PERSONNEL 0 1.125 0.625 0.875 9.75 0.25 0 0 0 4 0TOTAL OFFICE DAYS 12.625 Total Field days 4 10 hr days ODC's hours RATE UNITS/DAYS Sub-/total
Optional Mark and Locate 5000 3 15000
0000
TOTAL 0 3 $15,000.00
ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL $48,904.00
Towill Fee Schedule NorCal Survey 2026
Field Crew