Agenda packet — Seaside City Council, July 17, 2025 (part 3 of 3)

Date Analyzed: 05/14/21
San Leandro, CA 94577 Date Printed: 05/17/21
First Reported:

Job ID/Site: 211283001 - City of Seaside, Seaside (#7) SGSFL Job ID: L1161 Date(s) Collected: 05/10/2021
Total Samples Submitted: 5
Total Samples Analyzed: 5
05/14/21
05/17/21
Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
7-D-01 12422214
Layer: Black Cementitious Tar ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) 7-D-02 12422215
Layer: Black Cementitious Tar ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) 7-D-03 12422216
Layer: Black Cementitious Tar ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) 7-E-01 12422217
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Layer: Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
7-F-01 12422218
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Layer: Dark Grey Cementitious Material ND
Layer: Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Analytical results and reports are generated by SGS Forensic Laboratories (SGSFL) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report.

Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by SGSFL to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.

Supporting laboratory documentationis available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by SGSFL. The client is solely responsiblefor the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from SGSFL. SGSFL is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materials analyzed. SGS Forensic Laboratories reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.

Tad Thrower, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory
1 of 1
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 Packet Page 706
Packet Page 707

"
"#
$ $
$
!

$
!$ #% $

" #$ %
## &

' $ #
$ (

)

" #$ %
## &

#' $ #
$ (

)
"

#$ '

#(
+ (

(

)

Packet Page 708

"
" #

8 AR4450A
Packet Page 709
AREA 8

HARDSCAPE AND BALLPARK

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY
Asbestos
Hardscape
 No asbestos was detected in the 11 samples collected and analyzed.

Ballpark
HOMO.

ID MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION CAL/OSHA CLASS
MBARD

CATEGORY

ESTIMATED

QUANTITY
Assumed Insulators Unknown Stadium Light
Pole Class II Category II -
Non-Friable
20 SF
(20 EA)
Assumed Insulation Paper 9" Green/Black
West Wing:

Throughout
Under
Carpeting And
Wooden Alter.

East Wing: NE
Hallway Closet.

This Material Is
On Concrete
Subflooring.

Class II Friable (RACM
when Removed) 75 SF
Subsurface asbestos cement piping is assumed throughout the area.

Lead Paint and Materials
Hardscape

ROOM COMPONENT SUBSTRATE COLOR CONDITION PB UNITS
Outside Floor Stripe Asphalt Yellow Deteriorated 3.6 mg/cm2 Outside Curb Concrete Yellow Deteriorated 1.6 mg/cm2
Outside Curb Concrete White Deteriorated 1.9 mg/cm2
Outside Curb Concrete Red Deteriorated 0.08 mg/cm2
Bold = Lead-based
Ballpark
 No lead paint or materials were identified.

Packet Page 710
AREA 8

HARDSCAPE AND BALLPARK

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY
Other Hazardous Materials
Hardscape
 No other hazardous materials were identified.

Ballpark

MATERIAL CONTAMINANT ESTIMATED

QUANTITY
Other Non-Incandescent Lamps Universal Waste 90
Stadium Light Poles Chemically Treated Wood 8
Packet Page 711

!
"" # $% &
!
""
' (
) !
"" #*+# &
*+#
, !
"" #"% !$ &
!!-

)"%
(
.
!/
#/"',
"

(

/ !
""
!
#
0 /
! "

"/#/#%
". (
1

""' (
2 !!-

/0
'"#3"
/%

" (
Packet Page 712
A03
B02
C01
B01
A01
A02
AREA - 8

CITY OF SEASIDE
FORMER FORT ORD PHASE - 2
AREA - 8

SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING
E01
I01
K01
F01
F02
D02
D01
E03
E02

BASKETBALL AREA
G01
H01
J01
Packet Page 713

CITY OF SEASIDE
FORMER FORT ORD PHASE - 2 SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING
AREA - 8
2 E01
E02
D02
E03
D01
Packet Page 714
Final Report
(EPA Method 40CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and EPA 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation) Bulk Asbestos Analysis
NVLAP Lab Code: 101459-0
Vista Environmental Consultants Client ID: L1161
Project Manager Report Number: B317311
2984 Teagarden St. Date Received:

Date Analyzed: 04/30/21
San Leandro, CA 94577 Date Printed: 05/03/21
First Reported:

Job ID/Site: 211283001 - City of Seaside, Seaside (8) SGSFL Job ID: L1161 Date(s) Collected: 04/28/2021
Total Samples Submitted: 6
Total Samples Analyzed: 6
04/30/21
05/03/21
Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
8-A01 12416965
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-A02 12416966
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-A03 12416967
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-B01 12416968
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-B02 12416969
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Layer: Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-C01 12416970
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Layer: Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
1 of 2
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 Packet Page 715
Report Number: B317311
Client Name: Vista Environmental Consultants Date Printed: 05/03/21 Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
Analytical results and reports are generated by SGS Forensic Laboratories (SGSFL) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report.

Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by SGSFL to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.

Tad Thrower, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory
2 of 2
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 Packet Page 716
Packet Page 717
Final Report
(EPA Method 40CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and EPA 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation) Bulk Asbestos Analysis
NVLAP Lab Code: 101459-0
Vista Environmental Consultants Client ID: L1161
Project Manager Report Number: B317910
2984 Teagarden St. Date Received:

Date Analyzed: 05/17/21
San Leandro, CA 94577 Date Printed: 05/17/21
First Reported:

Job ID/Site: 211283001 - City of Seaside, Seaside (#8) SGSFL Job ID: L1161 Date(s) Collected: 05/10/2021
Total Samples Submitted: 12
Total Samples Analyzed: 12
05/14/21
05/17/21
Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
8-D-01 12422220
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-D-02 12422221
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-E-01 12422222
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-E-02 12422223
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-E-03 12422224
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-F-01 12422225
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-F-02 12422226
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-G-01 12422227
Layer: Black Semi-Fibrous Tar ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace) Fibrous Glass (20 %)
1 of 2
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 Packet Page 718
Report Number: B317910
Client Name: Vista Environmental Consultants Date Printed: 05/17/21 Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
8-H-01 12422228
Layer: Grey Mortar ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-I-01 12422229
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Layer: Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-J-01 12422230
Layer: Brown Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
8-K-01 12422231
Layer: Grey Stones ND
Layer: Black Tar ND
Layer: Black Felt ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (40 %) Fibrous Glass (35 %)
Analytical results and reports are generated by SGS Forensic Laboratories (SGSFL) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report.

Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by SGSFL to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.

"
"#
$ $
$
!

$
!$ #% $

" ! #$ %
## &

' $ #
$ (

)

!" !#!

" ! #$

#(
$ $ #
$ (

)
!

Packet Page 722
2984 Teagarden Street
San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel 510.346.8860
Fax 888.296.0271
January 14, 2019
Peter Said, PMP
Project Manager
Fort Ord Reuse Authority
920 2nd Avenue, Suite A
Marina, CA 93933
Project: Pre-Demolition Asbestos and Lead Survey Report FORA – AR4450A (Wooden Structure) and Shed (Lightfighter Dr. & 1st Ave.) Dear Mr. Said:

Executive Summary
At the request of the Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA), Vista Environmental Consulting (Vista) performed a pre-demolition asbestos and lead survey and collected bulk samples for the determination of asbestos and lead content at AR4450A, the Wooden Structure south of AR4450, and the Shed located at the corner of Lightfighter Dr. and 1st Ave, Seaside, California (Project Site). The pre-demolition surveys were performed on December 19, 2018 by Vista employees, Mr. Christopher Burns and Mr. Javier Rocha.

The results of the survey indicate that the following hazardous materials may be in the path of construction areas:

AR4450A
Asbestos
x No asbestos was detected in the 20 samples collected and analyzed for asbestos.

Lead
Sample # Component Substrate Color Location Result Units 4450A-PB01 Walls Wood Beige Exterior 6.3 wt%
4450A-PB02 Windows Wood Brown Exterior &
Interior 4 wt%
4450A-PB03 Floor Vinyl Brown Interior 170 mg/kg
Bold = Lead Based
Packet Page 723
Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Lead Survey January 14, 2019
AR4450A and Shed Project No. 181091001
2 Other
x 260 fluorescent light tubes (Universal Waste) and 4 light fixture ballasts (Suspect PCBs) were visually identified inside the building.

Shed
Asbestos
x No asbestos was detected in the 2 samples collected and analyzed for asbestos.

Lead
x The 1 sample collected and analyzed for lead was below the reporting limit of 0.007 wt%.

Methodology
Vista performed the pre-demolition asbestos and lead survey on December 19, 2018. The asbestos survey was conducted by Christopher Burns, a State of California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) #92-0224. Javier Rocha, a Cal/OSHA Certified Site Surveillance Technician (CSST) #02-3244, assisted on the survey. The lead screening survey was conducted by Christopher Burns, who is a State of California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Lead-Related Construction Certificate Inspector/Assessor (LRCIA) #663.

Asbestos
The asbestos survey was performed generally in accordance with the AHERA protocol (40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E). Visual identification was conducted by assessing visible and accessible structural, architectural, and mechanical components for the presence of suspect asbestos-containing material (ACM) at the Project Site. Each identified suspect ACM was sampled in accordance with procedures established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

Suspect ACM samples were delivered, under chain-of-custody protocol, to Forensic Analytical Laboratories in Hayward, California. Forensic Analytical Laboratories is accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and the California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (Cal-ELAP). The samples were submitted for analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) utilizing dispersion staining techniques in accordance with the EPA’s “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” U.S. EPA/600/R-93/116, Visual Area Estimate, dated July 1993 and adopted by the NVLAP as Test Method Code 18/A01.

Lead
Vista’s lead construction screening assessment included collecting bulk samples of representative painted and coated surfaces for evaluation of lead levels for worker health and safety and preliminary waste characterization prior to construction activities. This survey was not a surface by surface inspection as outlined in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Packet Page 724
Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Lead Survey January 14, 2019
AR4450A and Shed Project No. 181091001
3 Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing pursuant to Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992. These analytical data can be helpful in evaluation of lead-related environmental risks in general, but cannot be used to calculate worker exposures, are not a substitute for employee exposure monitoring, and are not sufficient for waste stream profiling.

Lead bulk samples were collected following United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Appendix 13.2: Paint Chip sampling from the Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, June 1995 and were delivered, under proper chain-ofcustody protocol, to Forensic Analytical Laboratories in Hayward, California. Forensic Analytical Laboratories is accredited under American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), the Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP), and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for multiple metals analysis. The samples were prepared and analyzed by method EPA 3050B/7420, Flame Atomic Absorption.

Results
Asbestos
The results of the bulk samples collected for asbestos, and analyzed by PLM, or assumed to be asbestos containing, indicate that detectable concentrations of asbestos are present, in the following materials:

AR4450A
x No asbestos was detected in the 20 samples collected and analyzed for asbestos.

Shed
x No asbestos was detected in the 2 samples collected and analyzed for asbestos.

The results of the bulk samples collected for asbestos, and analyzed by PLM, indicate that detectable concentrations of asbestos are not present in the following materials:

AR4450A
HOMOGENEOUS ID MATERIAL DESCRIPTION # OF SAMPLES
A Paint Beige & Brown, Exterior 2
B Sealant Off-White, Exterior Wood Seams 2
C Putty Off-White, Windows 2
D Vinyl Floor Tile/Mastic 9'' Red/Black 2
Packet Page 725
Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Lead Survey January 14, 2019
AR4450A and Shed Project No. 181091001
4 HOMOGENEOUS ID MATERIAL DESCRIPTION # OF SAMPLES
E Vinyl Floor Tile/Mastic 12'' White/Black 2
F Wallboard/Joint Compound White/White, Walls & Ceilings 2 G Vapor Paper Black, Exterior Walls 2
H Sealant White, Exterior Pipe Penetrations 2
I Roofing/Felt Green/Black, Built-Up 2
J Vinyl Sheet Flooring/Mastic Red/ Black, Under Wood & D & E 2
Shed
HOMOGENEOUS ID MATERIAL DESCRIPTION # OF SAMPLES
A Paint Beige & Brown, Interior and
Exterior 1
B Roofing/Felt Gray/Black, Built-up 1
Lead
For purposes of this survey, and in accordance with Title 8 CCR, Section 1532.1 (8 CCR 1532.1) and Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 35001 et. seq. the bulk paint chip sample or XRF direct read instrument results were interpreted as follows:

1. Lead-based paints (LBP) are present when bulk paint chip samples reveal a lead concentration of 5,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) or parts per million (ppm), 0.5% by weight (wt%) or 1.0 milligrams per centimeter squared (mg/cm²) via XRF direct read instrument sampling.

2. Lead-containing paints are present when bulk paint chip samples reveal a lead concentration of <5,000 mg/kg or 0.5 wt% down to the analytical detection limit of the analysis, or <1.0 milligrams per centimeter squared (mg/cm²) via XRF direct read instrument sampling down to the detection limit of the device.

3. “No lead detected” was determined when bulk paint chip samples did not reveal a lead concentration above the analytical detection limit of the laboratory or direct read instrument sampling device.

Packet Page 726
Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Lead Survey January 14, 2019
AR4450A and Shed Project No. 181091001
5 The bulk paint chip results or XRF direct read instrument results for this survey indicated that the following building components and respective surface coatings have lead concentrations defining them as LBP, in accordance with Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 35001 et. seq.:

AR4450A
Sample # Component Substrate Color Location Result Units 4450A-PB01 Walls Wood Beige Exterior 6.3 wt%
4450A-PB02 Windows Wood Brown Exterior & Interior 4 wt% Shed
x None
The bulk paint chip sample results or XRF direct read instrument results for this survey indicate that the following building components and respective surface coatings have lead concentrations, in excess of the level for compliance with trigger activities, as defined in 8 CCR 1532.1:

AR4450A
Sample # Component Substrate Color Room Result Units
4450A-PB03 Floor Vinyl Brown Interior 170 mg/kg
Shed
x None
Asbestos and lead analytical results, bulk sample forms/chain of custody documents and field drawings can be found attached to this letter report.

Conclusions/Recommendations
Asbestos
The results of the survey indicate that asbestos-containing materials are not present in the anticipated path of construction at the Project Site.

Lead
The results of the survey indicate that lead-based and lead-containing paints are present in AR4450A at the Project Site.

At present there is no state or federal regulation requiring mandatory lead removal or abatement prior to disturbance of building materials with identified lead paint or coatings. However, there are applicable Cal/OSHA worker protection and training requirements, Cal/EPA waste disposal requirements, CDPH requirements for public and residential buildings, and SB 460 lead hazard regulations that apply to leadPacket Page 727 Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Lead Survey January 14, 2019
AR4450A and Shed Project No. 181091001
6 related construction activities, abatement activities and their associated wastes. The following is a brief discussion and summary of applicable regulatory requirements:

Ƈ Cal/OSHA: Title 8, California Code of Regulation (CCR), Section 1532.1 (8 CCR 1532.1) governs occupational exposure to lead. This regulation requires that prior to initiation of certain activities, referred to as “trigger tasks”, workers must be trained, medically evaluated, and properly fitted with respiratory protection, and protective clothing until statistically reliable personal eight-hour time weighted average (TWA) results indicate lead exposure levels below the Personal Exposure Limit (PEL) for each unique task which disturbs lead-based and lead-containing coatings. This process is known as a Negative Exposure Assessment or NEA.

If the result of the exposure assessment is above the Action Level (AL) additional monitoring is required and if the result is above the PEL additional exposure monitoring, worker protection (including respirator protection and PPE), training and medical requirements apply. However even where the NEA criteria is met, certain hazard communication training and work practice controls still apply where lead is disturbed. “Trigger tasks” are tasks that are assumed to exceed the PEL pending an exposure assessment and they encompass the majority of construction activities that disturb surface coatings. Examples of “trigger” tasks range from manual paint scraping as a lower expected exposure up to hot work and abrasive blasting as the highest expected exposures, and include any non-listed task that the employer determines may potentially expose employees to lead levels above the AL. “OSHA does not consider any method that relies solely on the analysis of bulk materials or surface content of lead (or other toxic material) to be acceptable for safely predicting employee exposure to airborne contaminates. Without air monitoring results or without the benefit of historical or objective data (including air sampling which clearly demonstrates that the employee can not be exposed above the action level during any process, operation, or activity) the analysis of bulk or surface samples can not be used to determine employee exposure.”- OSHA Standard Interpretation May 8, 2000.

OSHA states that these rules apply to “any detectable concentration of lead” without a specified detection level. Due to the Consumer Product Safety Commission currently allowing paint to contain up to 90 parts per million (ppm) or 0.009 wt% of lead, the variation of lead content due to aging and weathering, and the variation of detection limits associated with analysis of bulk materials, such as paint chips and surface content analysis via XRF, it is recommended that all painted or coated surfaces be treated as potentially containing lead. Positive analytical results by either method can be used to indicate that detectable lead is present but negative results cannot be interpreted as conclusively demonstrating the absence of lead.

Analytical data from analysis of bulk materials or surface content of lead can be helpful in evaluation of lead-related environmental risks in general but cannot be used to calculate worker exposures and are not a substitute for employee exposure monitoring. As a result of the above, any employee that works around Packet Page 728
Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Lead Survey January 14, 2019
AR4450A and Shed Project No. 181091001
7 potential lead-based or lead-containing coatings must have HAZCOM training and personal exposure air monitoring is additionally required for employees that disturb such coatings. Significant additional certification, notification, and work practices are required for materials found to be lead-based.

Any welding, cutting or heating of metal surfaces containing surface coatings should be conducted in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.354 and 8 CCR 1537. These regulations require surfaces covered with toxic preservatives, and in enclosed areas, be stripped of all toxic coatings for a distance of at least 4 inches, in all directions, from the area of heat application prior to the initiation of such heat application.

Ƈ Cal/EPA through the Division of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) regulates disposal of lead hazardous waste (22 CCR Division 4.5, Minimum Standards for Management of Hazardous and Extremely Hazardous Wastes). DTSC has issued guidance indicating that architectural debris with intact lead paint is normally expected to be handled as general construction waste. However, waste stream segregation and analysis is still required for all lead painted or coated debris regardless if the paint or coating is intact on a building component or not. The resulting wastes may be hazardous under California and federal RCRA standards for lead and therefore require proper handling, packaging, labeling, and transportation under a proper manifest to a permitted hazardous waste storage, treatment and disposal facility.

Ƈ CDPH: The Department of Public Health (CDPH) has specific requirements (Title 17 Sections 35001 thru 36100 et. al.) for hazard assessment and work in public or residential structures in regards to leadbased paint. These regulations require special certifications, work practices, and notification for such activities.

Ƈ Senate Bill 460 (SB 460): An act to amend Section 1941.1 of the Civil Code, and to amend Sections 17961, 17980, and 124130 of, and to add Sections 17920.10, 105251, 105252, 105253, 105254, 105255, 105256, and 105257 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to lead abatement. This bill allows for fines and criminal penalties to be levied on any person who is found to have performed lead abatement without containment or created a measurable “lead hazard” based upon current CDPH standards. A “lead hazard” means deteriorated lead-based paint, lead contaminated dust, lead contaminated soil, disturbing leadbased paint or presumed lead-based paint without containment, or any other nuisance which may result in persistent and quantifiable lead exposure.

Vista recommends that all parties that come into contact with paint that has detectable lead content follow all applicable federal, state and local regulations relating to employee health and safety and proper disposal of generated wastes.

Other
Packet Page 729
Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Lead Survey January 14, 2019
AR4450A and Shed Project No. 181091001
8 All potential and identified Universal Waste materials (UW) impacted by the work should be removed and recycled or disposed of in accordance with the UW guidelines established by the DTSC, as stated in 22 CCR Sections 66261.9 and 66273.1 thru 66273.90.

All ballasts must be visually inspected prior to disposal to determine if they contain PCB’s. Those ballasts marked No PCB’s or PCB Free can be considered as such and should be treated as UW - electronic waste.

All PCB-containing devices, including, but not limited to ballasts should be removed or have the oils removed and properly handled, collected, stored, transported and recycled or disposed of by an approved recycling or disposal facility in accordance with the requirements of Title 22 CCR 67426.1.

Limitations and Exclusions
Subsurface investigations were not included as part of this survey, nor were areas outside of the path of demolition for the project.

Findings, conclusions, recommendations and analytical data offered in this report have been derived from reviewing existing information provided by the client, visual assessment of the building materials and systems, and the outcome of sampling and analysis of suspected hazardous materials.

If materials having characteristics in common with those identified in this report or if other forms of suspect hazardous materials are discovered during work activities, maintenance personnel and/or contractors should be instructed to immediately cease work activities which may initiate an exposure episode, and notify the appropriate management personnel.

If you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, please contact me at (510) 346- 8860.

Respectfully Submitted,
Vista Environmental Consulting, Inc. Reviewed and Approved Christopher R. Burns Charles R. Bove
Senior Project Manager Principal
CAC #92-0224 CAC #92-0160
CPDH #663
Attachments
Packet Page 730
Packet Page 731
Packet Page 732
Final Report
(EPA Method 40CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and EPA 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation) Bulk Asbestos Analysis
Vista Environmental Consultants Client ID: L1161
Project Manager Report Number: B270690
2984 Teagarden St. Date Received:

Date Analyzed: 12/21/18
San Leandro, CA 94577 Date Printed: 12/21/18
First Reported:

Job ID/Site: 181091001 - FORA, 4450A FALI Job ID: L1161 Date(s) Collected: 12/19/2018
Total Samples Submitted: 20
Total Samples Analyzed: 20
12/20/18
12/21/18
Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
4450A-A01 12108973
Layer: Beige/ Brown Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
4450A-A02 12108974
Layer: Beige/ Brown Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
4450A-B01 12108975
Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) 4450A-B02 12108976
Layer: Off-White Non-Fibrous Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) 4450A-C01 12108977
Layer: Off-White Putty ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
4450A-C02 12108978
Layer: Off-White Putty ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
4450A-D01 12108979
Layer: Red-Brown Tile ND
Layer: Black Mastic ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
4450A-D02 12108980
Layer: Red-Brown Tile ND
Layer: Black Mastic ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
1 of 3
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 Packet Page 733
Report Number: B270690
Client Name: Vista Environmental Consultants Date Printed: 12/21/18 Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
4450A-E01 12108981
Layer: White Tile ND
Layer: Black Mastic ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
4450A-E02 12108982
Layer: White Tile ND
Layer: Black Mastic ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
4450A-F01 12108983
Layer: White Drywall ND
Layer: White Joint Compound ND
Layer: Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (20 %) Fibrous Glass (10 %)
4450A-F02 12108984
Layer: White Drywall ND
Layer: White Joint Compound ND
Layer: Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (20 %) Fibrous Glass (10 %)
4450A-G01 12108985
Layer: Black Felt ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (95 %)
4450A-G02 12108986
Layer: Black Felt ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (95 %)
4450A-H01 12108987
Layer: White Non-Fibrous Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) 4450A-H02 12108988
Layer: White Non-Fibrous Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) 4450A-I01 12108989
Layer: Green Roof Shingle ND
Layer: Black Felt ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (55 %) Fibrous Glass (10 %)
2 of 3
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 Packet Page 734
Report Number: B270690
Client Name: Vista Environmental Consultants Date Printed: 12/21/18 Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
4450A-I02 12108990
Layer: Green Roof Shingle ND
Layer: Black Felt ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (55 %) Fibrous Glass (10 %)
4450A-J01 12108991
Layer: Red-Brown Sheet Flooring ND
Layer: Fibrous Backing ND
Layer: Black Mastic ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (20 %) Fibrous Glass (5 %) Synthetic (10 %)
4450A-J02 12108992
Layer: Red-Brown Sheet Flooring ND
Layer: Fibrous Backing ND
Layer: Black Mastic ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (20 %) Fibrous Glass (5 %) Synthetic (10 %)
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. (FALI) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by FALI to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.

Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by FALI. The client is solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from FALI. Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materials analyzed. FALI reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.

Tad Thrower, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory
3 of 3
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 Packet Page 735
Packet Page 736
Packet Page 737
Final Report
(EPA Method 40CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and EPA 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation) Bulk Asbestos Analysis
Vista Environmental Consultants Client ID: L1161
Chris Burns Report Number: B270675
2984 Teagarden St. Date Received:

Date Analyzed: 12/21/18
San Leandro, CA 94577 Date Printed: 12/21/18
First Reported:

Job ID/Site: 181091001 - FORA, Shed (Corner of 1st Ave. & Light Fighter Dr.) FALI Job ID: L1161 Date(s) Collected: 12/19/2018
Total Samples Submitted: 2
Total Samples Analyzed: 2
12/20/18
12/21/18
Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
SHED-A01 12108949
Layer: Beige/ Brown Paint ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) SHED-B01 12108950
Layer: Grey Roof Shingle ND
Layer: Black Felt ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (55 %) Fibrous Glass (10 %)
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. (FALI) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by FALI to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.

Report Number:

Date Received:

M206168
Job ID / Site: 181091001, Surplus II, Building 4450A
Vista Environmental Consultants L1161
FALI Job ID:

Date Analyzed:

L1161
Project Manager
San Leandro, CA 94577
2984 Teagarden St.

Date Printed: 12/26/18
12/26/18
First Reported: 12/26/18
12/20/18
Final Report
(AIHA-LAP, LLC Accreditation, Lab ID #101762)
Date(s) Collected: 12/19/18 Total Samples Submitted:

Total Samples Analyzed:
2 2
Sample Number Lab Number Result
Result Reporting Method
Analyte Units Limit* Reference
4450A-PB01 30822871 wt% 0.6 Pb 6.3 EPA 3050B/7000B
4450A-PB02 30822872 wt% 0.4 Pb 4.0 EPA 3050B/7000B
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by Forensic Analytical to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by Forensic Analytical. The client is solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from Forensic Analytical. Forensic Analytical is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materials analyzed. Forensic Analytical reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. Any modifications that have been made to referenced test methods are documented in Forensic Analytical's Standard Operating Procedures Manual. Sample results have not been blank corrected. Quality control and sample receipt condition were acceptable unless otherwise noted.

Daniele Siu, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory
* The Reporting Limit represents the lowest amount of analyte that the laboratory can confidently detect in the sample, and is not a regulatory level. The Units for the Reporting Limit are the same as the Units for the Final Results. 3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 1 of 1
Packet Page 740
Metals Analysis of Bulks - TTLC
Client ID:

Report Number:

Date Received:

M206169
Job ID / Site: 181091001, Surplus II, Building 4450A
Vista Environmental Consultants L1161
FALI Job ID:

Date Analyzed:

L1161
Project Manager
San Leandro, CA 94577
2984 Teagarden St.

Date Printed: 12/21/18
12/21/18
First Reported: 12/21/18
12/20/18
Final Report
(AIHA-LAP, LLC Accreditation, Lab ID #101762)
Date(s) Collected: 12/19/18 Total Samples Submitted:

Total Samples Analyzed:
1 1
Sample Number Lab Number Result
Result Reporting Method
Analyte Units Limit* Reference
4450A-PB03 30822873 mg/kg 20 Pb 170 EPA 3050B/7000B
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by Forensic Analytical to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by Forensic Analytical. The client is solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from Forensic Analytical. Forensic Analytical is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materials analyzed. Forensic Analytical reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. Any modifications that have been made to referenced test methods are documented in Forensic Analytical's Standard Operating Procedures Manual. Sample results have not been blank corrected. Quality control and sample receipt condition were acceptable unless otherwise noted.

Report Number:

Date Received:

M206153
Job ID / Site: Shed, FORA, Shed
Vista Environmental Consultants L1161
FALI Job ID:

Date Analyzed:

L1161
Project Manager
San Leandro, CA 94577
2984 Teagarden St.

Date Printed: 12/21/18
12/21/18
First Reported: 12/21/18
12/20/18
Final Report
(AIHA-LAP, LLC Accreditation, Lab ID #101762)
Date(s) Collected: 12/19/18 Total Samples Submitted:

Total Samples Analyzed:
1 1
Sample Number Lab Number Result
Result Reporting Method
Analyte Units Limit* Reference
SHED-PB01 30822837 wt% 0.007 Pb < 0.007 EPA 3050B/7000B Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by Forensic Analytical to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by Forensic Analytical. The client is solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from Forensic Analytical. Forensic Analytical is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materials analyzed. Forensic Analytical reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. Any modifications that have been made to referenced test methods are documented in Forensic Analytical's Standard Operating Procedures Manual. Sample results have not been blank corrected. Quality control and sample receipt condition were acceptable unless otherwise noted.

"
" #

Packet Page 745

!!!

!"#$

%%&'

(
%
&%(
%
&$

!" #
$%
&
&'
% (%%)
*
+ !" #

%)*

&
#&%&
!&

'
$
Packet Page 746

!"#$$ #
%#& '
!"#$$ (!!#
) '
* !"#$$
#+",! '
!"#$$
!"#
-"+.
!## #
.#

'
Packet Page 747
1 CITY OF SEASIDE
FORMER OLD FORT ORD PHASE - 2
AREA - 10

SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING
B01
C02
A03
B02 C01 D01 A02
D02
E02
E01
A01
Packet Page 748
Final Report
(EPA Method 40CFR, Part 763, Appendix E to Subpart E and EPA 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation) Bulk Asbestos Analysis
NVLAP Lab Code: 101459-0
Vista Environmental Consultants Client ID: L1161
Project Manager Report Number: B317907
2984 Teagarden St. Date Received:

Date Analyzed: 05/17/21
San Leandro, CA 94577 Date Printed: 05/17/21
First Reported:

Job ID/Site: 211283001 - City of Seaside, Seaside (#10) SGSFL Job ID: L1161 Date(s) Collected: 05/10/2021
Total Samples Submitted: 11
Total Samples Analyzed: 10
05/14/21
05/17/21
Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
10-A-01 12422196
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
10-A-02 12422197
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
10-A-03 12422198
Layer: Black Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
10-B-01 12422199
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
10-C-01 12422201
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
10-C-02 12422202
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
10-D-01 12422203
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
10-D-02 12422204
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
1 of 2
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218 Packet Page 749
Report Number: B317907
Client Name: Vista Environmental Consultants Date Printed: 05/17/21 Sample ID Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos Asbestos Percent in Percent in
Type Type Layer Layer
10-E-01 12422205
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
10-E-02 12422206
Layer: Grey Cementitious Material ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components: Asbestos (ND) Cellulose (Trace)
Analytical results and reports are generated by SGS Forensic Laboratories (SGSFL) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report.

Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by SGSFL to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.

#
#$

% ! %
%
"

!"% $& !
%

!" #

!$ % "!
" $&

! "
#

$%

!" !$ '

!# "!
" $&

Packet Page 753

APPENDIX B

VISTA CERTIFICATIONS
Packet Page 754
Packet Page 755

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH

LEAD-RELATED CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
Disclaimer: This document alone should not be relied upon to confirm certification status. Compare the individual’s photo and name to another valid form ofgovernment issued photo identification. Verify the individual’s certification status by searching for Lead-Related Construction Professionals at www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/clppb or calling (800) 597-LEAD INDIVIDUAL: CERTIFICATE TYPE: NUMBER: EXPIRATION DATE:

Lead Project Designer LRC-00006939 7/2/2025Lead Inspector/Assessor LRC-00006938 7/2/2025Lead Project Monitor LRC-00006937 7/2/2025 Christopher Burns
Packet Page 756
Packet Page 757

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH

Lead Sampling Technician LRC-00000629 7/23/2025
Luis Rocha
Packet Page 758
APPENDIX 2

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
AND

RARE PLANT SURVEY EXHIBIT
Packet Page 759
21 Packet Page 178
(;+,%,7%
0,7,*$7,21021,725,1*$1'5(3257,1*352*5$0
Attachment %
5(62/87,2112;;
$5(62/87,212)7+(&,7<&281&,/&(57,)<,1*7+(
(19,5210(17$/,03$&75(3257)257+(&$038672:1
63(&,),&
3/$1352-(&70$.,1*&$/,)251,$(19,5210(17$/
48$/,7<$&7
),1',1*6$1'$'237,1*$0,7,*$7,21021,725,1*$1'
5(3257,1*352*5$0
([FHUSWIURPWKH&LW\RI6HDVLGH
&DPSXV7RZQ(,5
0LWLJDWLRQ0RQLWRULQJDQG5HSRUWLQJ3URJUDP
Packet Page 760
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Final Environmental Impact Report 217
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program
CEQA requires that a mitigation monitoring or reporting program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Section Code 21081.6; CEQA Guidelines Section 15097).

This mitigation monitoring and reporting program is intended to track and ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during project implementation. For each mitigation measure in the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR), specifications are made herein that identify the action required, the monitoring that must occur, the monitoring frequency, and the agency or department responsible for oversight.

Packet Page 761
Final Environmental Impact Report 218
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
Biological Resources BIO-1(a) Special-Status Plant Pre-Construction Survey Surveys for special status plants shall be completed by the project proponent prior to any vegetation removal, grubbing, or other construction activity (including staging and mobilization). The surveys shall be floristic in nature, that is, every plant observed shall be identified to species subspecies, or variety, sufficient to identify listed plants. The surveys shall be seasonally timed to coincide with the target Federal and State listed species and rare plants identified above. All plant surveys shall be conducted by a City-approved biologist during the appropriate blooming period during the year prior to initial ground disturbance. All special status plant species identified on site shall be mapped onto a site-specific aerial photograph or topographic map with the use of Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. Surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the most current protocols established by the CDFW, USFWS, and the local jurisdictions if said protocols exist. A report of the survey results shall be submitted to the implementing agency, and the CDFW and/or USFWS, as appropriate, for review.

For each grading phase, retain a City-approved biologist to conduct special status plant surveys prior to vegetation removal, grubbing, or other construction within that phase. Submit a report of the survey results to the implementing agency, CDFW, and/or USFWS, as appropriate, for review.

During the blooming period within one year of initial ground disturbance for each grading phase Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
BIO-1(b) Special-Status Plant Species Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation If Federal and/or State listed species are found during special status plant pre-construction surveys [required under Mitigation Measure BIO1(a)], avoidance of, or mitigation for impacts to, For each grading or construction phase, retain a City-approved biologist to establish avoidance or Prior to construction for each
grading and
Once City of
Seaside Planning
Packet Page 762
Final Environmental Impact Report 219
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
occupied habitat shall be required. If populations of CRPR List 1B or 2 species are found during special status plant preconstruction surveys, the City-approved biologist shall evaluate whether the loss of occupied areas would result in a regional population level impact. Mitigation for regional population level impacts to rare plants shall be required by the City and Mitigation Measure BIO-1(c) would be required. If feasible, the Proposed Project shall be re-designed to avoid development in locations of Federal and/or State listed or CRPR List 1B or 2 species. Federal and/or State listed or CRPR List 1B or 2 species occurrences that are not within the immediate disturbance footprint and would be avoided, but which are located within 50 feet of disturbance limits, shall have bright orange protective fencing installed at an appropriate distance (as determined by a qualified biologist) to ensure they are protected during construction activities. If development cannot avoid Federally or State listed plants species, then USFWS and CDFW, as appropriate, shall be consulted regarding the potential for salvage of individual plants or seek compensation (minimum compensation ratio of 1:1 at a similar density if individuals) for the loss of these individuals or their habitat either in an on-site or off-site preserve or as otherwise determined in coordinate with USFWS and CDFW through the Coordinated Research Management Planning Program and in compliance with FESA and CESA as required.

The City shall consult with USFWS and CDFW for
mitigation of impacts to occupied habitat within that phase. Require final project plans to be re-designed to avoid special status plant species, if feasible. Require protective fencing be placed around special status plants within 50 feet of disturbance limits. Consult with USFWS and CDFW regarding salvage of plants or to seek compensation for the loss of individual plants. construction phase During substantial conformance review for each construction phase During construction, for each construction phase Prior to construction for each construction phase Department
Packet Page 763
Final Environmental Impact Report 220
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
the potential to salvage or “take” listed species and to determine if take authorization would be required by one or both agencies. Impacts to Federal and/or State listed or CRPR List 1B or 2 species would require adherence to Mitigation Measure BIO-1(c). BIO-1(c) Restoration and Monitoring If development cannot avoid Federal or State listed plant species, all impacts shall be mitigated by the project applicant at a ratio to be determined by the City in coordination with CDFW and USFWS (as applicable) for each species. Mitigation ratios shall be a minimum of 1:1 for areas occupied by the species, but may be higher pending consultation with CDFW and/or USFWS. Restoration areas shall be of a similar density of individuals as areas impacted Project activities. A restoration plan shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City for review and approval. If development cannot avoid a Federally and/or State listed plant species, the restoration plan shall be submitted to the USFWS and/or CDFW for review and approval. Population level impacts to CRPR List 1B or 2 species shall also be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio for occupied areas, and shall also require a restoration plan in coordination with the City. Mitigation shall be accomplished at an off-site habitat preserve or through the purchase of credits from an approved mitigation bank. The restoration plan(s) shall include, at a minimum, the
In coordination with CDFW and USFWS, determine a mitigation ratio for impacted plant species. Review the applicantprepared restoration plan and oversee submittal of the plan to USFWS and/or CDFW.

Prior to construction, if applicable During substantial conformance review and approval Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
Packet Page 764
Final Environmental Impact Report 221
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
following components: Description of the project/affected species location (s) (i.e., location, responsible parties, areas to be impacted by habitat type) Compensatory mitigation [type(s) and
area(s) species to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved; specific functions and values of species type(s) to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved; and establishment of mitigation ratios appropriate to the affected species in consultation with the USFWS and CDFW, as appropriate] Description of the proposed compensatory
mitigation site (location and size, ownership status, existing functions and values) Implementation plan for the compensatory
mitigation site (rationale for expecting implementation success, responsible parties, schedule, site preparation, planting plan) Maintenance activities during the monitoring
period, including weed removal as appropriate (activities, responsible parties, schedule) Monitoring plan for the compensatory
mitigation site, including no less than quarterly monitoring for the first year (performance standards, target functions and values, target acreages to be established, restored, enhanced, and/or preserved, annual monitoring reports) Success criteria based on the goals and
Packet Page 765
Final Environmental Impact Report 222
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
measurable objectives; said criteria to be, at a minimum, at least 80 percent survival of container plants and 30 percent relative cover by vegetation type An adaptive management program and
remedial measures to address any shortcomings in meeting success criteria Notification of completion of compensatory
mitigation and agency confirmation
Contingency measures (initiating procedures,
alternative locations for contingency compensatory mitigation, funding mechanism) BIO-1(d) Special-Status Wildlife Pre-Construction Surveys General Wildlife Surveys For each construction phase in areas containing oak woodland or developed woodlands, preconstruction clearance surveys for Monterey dusky-footed woodrat, northern California legless lizard, coast horned lizard, and American badger shall be conducted within 14 days prior to the start of construction (including staging and mobilization). The surveys shall cover the entire disturbance footprint plus a minimum 200-foot buffer, where permissible, and shall identify all special status animal species that may occur on-site. California legless lizard, coast horned lizard, Monterey dusky-footed woodrats and wood rat middens shall be relocated from the site by a qualified biologist. American badger shall be passively excluded with the use of oneFor each construction phase in areas containing oak woodland or developed woodlands, retain a qualified biologist to conduct pre- construction surveys for Monterey dusky-footed woodrat, northern California legless lizard, coast horned lizard, and American badger; and relocate California legless lizard, coast horned lizard, Monterey dusky-footed woodrats and wood rat middens. Require passive exclusion of American badger, if Within 14 days prior to the start of construction of each construction phase in areas containing oak woodland or developed woodlands During construction of each construction Once for each construction phase City of Seaside Planning Department Packet Page 766
Final Environmental Impact Report 223
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
way doors. Burrowing Owl Surveys A qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction clearance surveys for each construction phase prior to ground disturbance activities within all suitable habitats such as open fields, lawns, and park strips, to confirm the presence/absence of burrowing owls. The surveys shall be consistent with the recommended survey methodology provided by CDFW (2012). Clearance surveys shall be conducted within 14 days prior to construction and ground disturbance activities. If no burrowing owls are observed, no further actions are required. If burrowing owls are detected during the pre-construction clearance surveys, the following measures shall apply: Avoidance buffers during the breeding and non-breeding season shall be implemented in accordance with the CDFW (2012) and Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993) minimization mitigation measures. If avoidance of burrowing owls is not
feasible, then additional measures such as passive relocation during the nonbreeding season and construction buffers of 200 feet during the breeding season shall be implemented, in consultation with CDFW. In addition, a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan will be applicable. For each construction phase containing suitable habitat for burrowing owl, retain a qualified biologist to conduct pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl habitat. Conduct clearance surveys For each construction phase in undeveloped areas, require avoidance buffers and passive relocation, if applicable. phase Within 14 days prior to the start of ground disturbance in each construction phase During construction of each construction phase Within 30 days of construction of each construction phase Packet Page 767
Final Environmental Impact Report 224
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
developed by a qualified biologist in accordance with the CDFW (2012) and Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993).

Smith’s Blue Butterfly Host Plant Surveys Prior to grading and construction in undeveloped areas, an approved biologist shall conduct surveys for seacliff buckwheat (Eriogonum parvifolium) and seaside buckwheat (Eriogonum
latifolium), host plants of Smith's blue butterfly.

If Smith's blue butterfly host plants are not located, no further action is required. If host plants are located within proposed disturbance areas, they shall be avoided if feasible. If avoidance is not feasible, focused surveys shall be conducted to determine presence or absence of the butterfly species. This may include transect surveys during the adult flight period (mid-June through early September), and/or inspection of host plants for all life forms (egg, larva, pupa, and adult). If individuals of any life stage that may be impacted by the Proposed Project are detected during focused surveys, a permit for relocation shall be obtained from USFWS, and they shall be relocated by a USFWS permitted biologist.

Sensitive Bat Surveys A qualified biologist shall conduct surveys for presence/absence of special status bats, in particular the Townsend’s big-eared bat, in For each construction phase in undeveloped areas, retain a qualified biologist to conduct pre-construction surveys for seacliff buckwheat and seaside buckwheat. Require avoidance of seacliff buckwheat and seaside buckwheat or additional focused surveys for Smith’s blue butterfly individuals, if applicable. Retain a USFWS-approved biologist and obtain a USFWS permit for relocation of Smith’s blue butterfly. For each construction phase including suitable roosting Prior to construction of each construction phase During construction of each construction phase Prior to construction Within 30 days of construction of each construction phase Packet Page 768
Final Environmental Impact Report 225
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
consultation with the CDFW where suitable roosting habitat is present within 30 days of the start of demolition of unused buildings. Surveys shall be conducted using acoustic detectors. If active roosts are located and are not part of an active maternity colony, exclusion devices such as netting shall be installed to discourage bats from occupying the site. Maternal bat colonies shall not be disturbed. If a roost is determined by a City-approved biologist to be used by a large number of bats, bat boxes shall be installed near the site. The number of bat boxes installed will depend on the size of the hibernaculum and shall be determined in consultations with a City-approved qualified biologist. If a maternity colony has become established, all construction activities shall be postponed within a 500-foot buffer around the maternity colony until it is determined by a Cityapproved biologist that the young have dispersed. Once it has been determined that the roost is clear of bats, the roost shall be removed immediately.

Reporting A report of all pre-construction and predemolition survey results shall be submitted to the City for its review prior to the start of demolition. The report should include a description of the survey methodology for each species, the environmental conditions at the time of the survey(s), the results of the survey, any requirements for addressing special status habitat for the Townsend’s big-eared bat, retain a qualified biologist to conduct pre-construction surveys for Townsend’s big-eared bat. Install exclusion devices, if applicable. Install bat boxes, if applicable. Establish 500-ft buffer from established maternity colony, if applicable. Require and review preconstruction and predemolition survey reports Prior to construction of each construction phase Prior to construction of each construction phase Packet Page 769
Final Environmental Impact Report 226
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
species identified during surveys, and the biological qualifications of the surveyors. The report shall be accompanied by maps and figures showing the location of any special status species occurrences and associated avoidance buffers. BIO-1(e) Biological Resources Avoidance and Minimization The following measures shall be applied to avoid impact to sensitive species and biological resources for each construction phase. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing selected measures. Ground disturbance shall be limited to the minimum necessary to complete the project. The project limits of disturbance for each construction phase shall be flagged. Areas of special biological concern within or adjacent to the limits of disturbance shall have highly visible orange construction fencing installed between said area and the limits of disturbance. All construction occurring within or adjacent
to natural habitats that may support Federally and/or State listed endangered/threatened species, State fully protected species, and/or special status species shall have a qualified biological monitor present during all initial ground disturbing/vegetation clearing activities. No endangered/threatened species shall be
captured and relocated without express permission from the CDFW and/or USFWS.

For each construction phase, require the following standard conditions of approval on substantial conformance review approval: limiting ground disturbance to the minimum necessary marked by orange construction fencing, retaining a qualified biological monitor, obtaining permission from CDFW and USFWS for species relocation, cessation of construction activities if a species enters the construction site and consultation with CDFW and USFWS, preventing wildlife entrapment, inspecting construction materials for animals prior to installation, directing construction lighting only on the work area, and presences of a City-approved qualified biologist during
During substantial conformance review and approval
Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
Packet Page 770
Final Environmental Impact Report 227
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
If at any time during construction an
endangered, threatened or fully protected species enters the construction site or otherwise may be impacted, all construction activities shall cease. A qualified biologist shall document the occurrence and consult with the CDFW and USFWS, as appropriate, to determine whether it was safe for project activities to resume. At the end of each workday, excavations
shall be secured with cover or a ramp provided to prevent wildlife entrapment. All trenches, pipes, culverts or similar
structures shall be inspected for animals prior to burying, capping, moving, or filling. If night work is required, all construction
lighting shall be pointed down and directed only on the work area. The City shall approve one or more qualified
biologists to oversee and monitor biological compliance for the project. At least one qualified biologist shall be present during all initial ground disturbing activities, including vegetation removal to recover special status animal species unearthed by construction activities. initial ground disturbance.

BIO-1(f) Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Surveys For each construction phase, ground disturbance, building demolition, and vegetation removal activities should be restricted to the non-breeding season (September 16 to January 31) when feasible. For disturbance, building For each construction phase, retain a qualified biologist to conduct general preconstruction nesting bird surveys, establish an Within 14 days prior to construction for each construction Once for each construction phase
City of Seaside Planning Department
Packet Page 771
Final Environmental Impact Report 228
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
demolition, and vegetation removal activities occurring during the nesting season (February 1 to September 15), general pre-construction nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist, including for, but not limited to, the California horned lark and the Whitetailed kite, not more than 14 days prior to construction activities involving ground clearing, vegetation removal/trimming, or building demolition. The surveys shall include the disturbance area plus a 200-foot buffer around the site if feasible, and a 500-foot buffer for White-tailed kite. If active nests are located, an appropriate avoidance buffer shall be established within which no work activity will be allowed which would impact these nests. The avoidance buffer would be established by the qualified biologist on a case-by-case basis based on the species and site conditions. In no cases will the buffer be smaller than 50 feet for nonraptor bird species, 200 feet for raptor species, or a 500-foot buffer for White-tailed kite. Larger buffers may be required depending upon the status of the nest and the construction activities occurring in the vicinity of the nest. If fully protected White-tailed kites are documented nesting within 500 feet of construction activities, CDFW shall be consulted on appropriate avoidance and minimization methods. The buffer area(s) shall be closed to all construction personnel and equipment until juveniles have fledged and the nest is inactive. City-approved Biologist shall confirm that breeding/nesting is completed and young have fledged the nest
avoidance buffer, consult with CDFW for avoidance and minimization of impacts to White-tailed kites, and confirm when the breeding season is completed. phase; during construction for each construction phase
Packet Page 772
Final Environmental Impact Report 229
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
prior to removal of the buffer. BIO-1(g) Tree Habitat Protection Measures The project proponent shall assure that oak trees to be preserved within 25 feet of proposed ground disturbances shall be temporarily fenced with orange plastic construction fencing or other similar material satisfactory to the City throughout all grading and construction activities, as access is permitted to ensure nesting bird and special status species habitat is protected. The fencing shall be at least five feet high and shall be located at the extent of the dripline or root zone, whichever is farther from the main trunk. Fencing shall be maintained for the duration of construction activities. No construction equipment shall be parked, stored, or operated within the fencing. No fill soil, rocks, or construction materials shall be stored or placed within the fencing. Any roots encountered that are one inch in
diameter or greater shall be cleanly cut. This shall be done under the direction of a Certified Arborist. All work within the dripline of native trees
shall be done under the direction of a Certified Arborist. Trimming of branches shall be done prior to
grading and under the direction of a Certified Arborist.

Require the following standard conditions of approval on substantial conformance review approval for each construction phase including oak trees to be preserved: preserve oak trees to be preserved within 25 feet of ground disturbance with temporary fencing and retain a Certified Arborist to oversee root cutting, work within the dripline of native trees, and branch trimming.

During substantial conformance review and approval for each construction phase Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
BIO-1(h) Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP)
Packet Page 773
Final Environmental Impact Report 230
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
Prior to initiation of construction activities (including staging and mobilization) for each construction phase, the project proponent shall arrange for all personnel associated with project construction for the applicable phase to attend WEAP training, conducted by a City-approved biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special status resources that may occur in the construction area. The specifics of this program shall include identification of the sensitive species and habitats, a description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of sensitive resources, and review of the limits of construction and mitigation measures required to reduce impacts to biological resources within the work area. A fact sheet conveying this information shall also be prepared for distribution to all contractors, their employers, and other personnel involved with construction. All employees shall sign a form provided by the trainer indicating they have attended the WEAP and understand the information presented to them. The form shall be submitted to the City to document compliance.

For each construction phase, retain a City-approved biologist to conduct WEAP training on recognizing special status species, provide a fact sheet, and collect employee signatures certifying completion of the WEAP training for submittal to the City.

Prior to construction of each construction phase
Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
Cultural Resources CUL-2(a) Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program A qualified archaeologist shall be retained who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology to conduct a Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) For each construction phase, retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct a WEAP training for archaeological sensitivity for Prior to construction of each construction
Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
Packet Page 774
Final Environmental Impact Report 231
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
training for archaeological sensitivity for all construction personnel involved in ground disturbance prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activities. Archaeological sensitivity training shall include a description of the types of cultural material that may be encountered, cultural sensitivity issues, regulatory issues, and the proper protocol for treatment of the materials in the event of a find. all construction personnel involved in ground disturbance. phase
CUL-2(b) Unanticipated Discoveries The project applicant shall implement the following measures for any development in the Plan Area and off-site improvement areas: If archaeological resources are encountered during ground-disturbing activities, work within
100 feet of the find shall be halted and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (National Park Service 1983) shall be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. If the resource is of Native American origin, the City shall contact a local Native American group listed by the NAHC for the name of a tribal representative qualified for consultation on potential finds of tribal cultural resources. The qualified archaeologist and City will consult with the designated tribal representative to evaluate whether the find may qualify as a tribal cultural resource. If the tribal representative does not respond to a consultation request within seven days, the archaeologist shall independently evaluate the find and make a recommendation to the City as Require ground-disturbance for each construction phase be halted if archaeological resources are encountered within that construction phase. If archaeological resources are encountered, retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the find. If archaeological resources of Native American origin are encountered, consult with the local Native American group regarding potential tribal resources. If significant archaeological resources or tribal cultural resources are encountered, During construction of each construction phase During construction of each construction phase During construction of each construction phase During As needed City of
Seaside Planning Department
Packet Page 775
Final Environmental Impact Report 232
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
to whether it is a tribal cultural resource.
If the resource is determined to be a significant
archaeological and/or tribal cultural resource, the archaeologist shall prepare a treatment plan, in consultation with the tribal representative (if applicable), that includes measures to avoid or reduce impacts to the resource. The treatment plan measures may include but not be limited to avoidance and preservation in place (the preferred method if feasible), capping, incorporation of the site within a park or other open space, data or heritage recovery, treatment of the resource with culturally appropriate dignity, protection of the cultural character, integrity, traditional use, and/or confidentiality of the resource, or permanent conservation easements. retain a qualified archaeologist to prepare a treatment plan to avoid or reduce impacts to the resource. construction of each construction phase
Geology and Soils GEO-5 Paleontological Resource Studies The City shall require the Proposed Project proponent to implement the following measures for any construction phase in previously undisturbed geologic strata with high paleontological sensitivity in the Plan Area and off-site improvement areas: g. Retain a Qualified Paleontologist. Prior to initial ground disturbance for each construction phase, the applicant shall retain a qualified professional paleontologist to prepare and implement a Paleontological Mitigation and Monitoring Program (PMMP) for the Proposed Project. The PMMP shall
For any construction phase in previously undisturbed geologic strata with high paleontological sensitivity in the Plan Area and off-site improvement areas, require as a condition of approval to substantial conformance approval that a project proponent retain a qualified professional paleontologist to prepare and implement a PMMP, conduct WEAP During substantial conformance review
Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
Packet Page 776
Final Environmental Impact Report 233
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
include measures requiring a preconstruction survey, a training program for construction personnel, paleontological monitoring, fossil salvage, curation, and final reporting. A qualified professional paleontologist is defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards as an individual preferably with an M.S. or Ph.D. in paleontology or geology who is experienced with paleontological procedures and techniques, who is knowledgeable in the geology of California, and who has worked as a paleontological mitigation project supervisor for a least two years (SVP 2010). h. Paleontological Worker Environmental
Awareness Program (WEAP). Prior to the start of construction, the Qualified Paleontologist or his or her designee shall conduct training for construction personnel regarding the appearance of fossils and the procedures for notifying paleontological staff should fossils be discovered by construction staff. The WEAP shall be fulfilled at the time of a pre-construction meeting that a Qualified Paleontologist shall attend. i. Paleontological Monitoring.

Paleontological monitoring shall be conducted during ground disturbing construction activities (including grading, trenching, foundation work, and other excavations) for each construction phase in previously undisturbed sediments with high paleontological sensitivities (i.e., the older stabilized dune sand that underlies the entire
training for paleontological sensitivity, and act as a monitor during ground disturbing activities in that construction phase, evaluate discovered paleontological resources, prepare and curate fossils for inclusion in a permanent paleontological collection, and prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report.

Packet Page 777
Final Environmental Impact Report 241
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
an annual and permanent basis, the offsets shall be purchased according to the City of Seaside’s preference, which is, in order of City preference: (1) within the City of Seaside; (2) within the Monterey Bay Air Resources District; (3) within the State of California; then (4) elsewhere in the United States. Offsets must be purchased from an Approved Registry.

Noise N-1 Construction-Related Noise Reduction Measures The applicant shall apply the following measures during construction of the Proposed Project. Mufflers. Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and all internal combustion engine driven machinery with intake and exhaust mufflers and engine shrouds, as applicable, shall be in good condition and appropriate for the equipment. During construction, all equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be operated with closed engine doors and shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards. Electrical Power. Electrical power, rather than
diesel equipment, shall be used to run compressors and similar power tools and to power any temporary structures, such as construction trailers or caretaker facilities. Equipment Staging. All stationary equipment
shall be staged as far away from the adjacent sensitive receptors as feasible. Equipment Idling. Construction vehicles and
equipment shall not be left idling for longer than five minutes when not in use.

Require the following standard conditions of approval on substantial conformance review during project construction for each construction phase: use properly operating and maintained mufflers, use electrical power to run compressors and similar equipment, stage equipment as far from sensitive receptors as feasible, limit equipment idling to less than five minutes, control radio noise levels, use smart backup alarms, designate a disturbance coordinator, and install temporary sound barriers.

During substantial conformance review and approval for each construction phase Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
Packet Page 778
Final Environmental Impact Report 242
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
Workers’ Radios. All noise from workers’
radios shall be controlled to a point that they are not audible at sensitive receptors near construction activity. Smart Back-up Alarms. Mobile construction
equipment shall have smart back-up alarms
that automatically adjust the sound level of the alarm in response to ambient noise levels. Alternatively, back-up alarms shall be disabled and replaced with human spotters to ensure safety when mobile construction equipment is moving in the reverse direction. Disturbance Coordinator. The applicant shall
designate a disturbance coordinator who shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The noise disturbance coordinator shall determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall require that reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem be implemented. A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site. Temporary Sound Barriers. For construction
activities located directly adjacent to sensitive receptors, temporary sound barriers shall be installed and maintained by the construction contractor between the construction site and adjacent residences during the demolition, site preparation, and grading phases of construction. Temporary sound barriers shall consist of either sound blankets or other sound barriers/techniques such as acoustic padding or acoustic walls placed near adjacent residential buildings that have been field-tested to reduce noise by least 15 dBA. Barriers shall be placed
Packet Page 779
Final Environmental Impact Report 243
Mitigation Measure/ Condition of Approval Action Required Monitoring Timing
Monitoring Frequency
Responsible Agency
Compliance
Verification
Initi
al
Dat
e
Comment
s
such that the line-of-sight between noisegenerating construction equipment and adjacent sensitive land uses is blocked, and shall be placed as close to the source equipment as feasible.

N-2 Vibration Reduction Measures The on-site operation of caisson drills, large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and other equipment that typically generates vibration levels exceeding 75 VdB at a distance of 50 feet from the source (“vibrational construction work”) shall be prohibited during construction activities within 100 feet of the structures where academic/training classes are occurring at Monterey College of Law and the Monterey Peninsula College Public Safety Training Center, while these institutions have scheduled academic/training classes. The applicant shall consult with these institutions to obtain input on the best time of year for the project’s vibrational construction work to occur within 100 feet of their structures and copies of their academic calendars if available. If certain times of year meet these criteria for one institution, but not the other, vibrational construction work can occur within 100 feet of the non-operational institution, so long as vibrational construction work does not occur within 100 feet of the other institution’s academic/training structures.

Prohibit “vibrational construction work” within 100 feet of structures at the Monterey College of Law or Monterey Peninsula College Public Safety Training Centers at which academic/training classes may occur, at any time when any academic/training classes in such structures actually are occurring, as a condition of approval to substantial conformance review for projects within 100 feet of such structures.

During substantial conformance review and approval
Once City of
Seaside Planning Department
Utilities and Service Systems UTIL-1 Water Offset Programs Packet Page 780
0 250 500 125
Feet
^_
^_
^_
^_^_
^_
Lighfighter Drive
Colonel Dunham Street
Giggling Road
General Jim Moore Blvd
~150 plants
2 plants
-8 plants
-75 plants
~100 plants
1 plant
5 plants
>1000 plants
Special-Status Plants and
Protected Trees
Fort Ord Campus Town
Building Demolition Sites ®
1 inch= 300 ft
Drawn By: J. Davilla, ESW
Date: 6/7/2021
Filepath: E:\Fort Ord Demolition
Image: ESRI Basemap ^_ Monterey spineflower ^_ Sandmat manzanita Packet Page 781
APPENDIX 3
AS-BUILT PLANS:

SURPLUS II UTILITY ABANDONMENT AND PROTECTION
PLAN
Packet Page 782
3 W-5 WORKDELETED
W
W-2ROMAC 501 ENDCAP W/CONC.THRUST BLOCKN/"T" FITTING
W-18 (ADD)ROMAC END CAPW/CONCRETETHRUST BLOCKJUST N OF "T".

W-1CLOSED VALVEROMAC 501 ENDCAP WITH CONC.THRUST BLOCK
W-17 ADD6" PVC RESTRAINEDMJ END CAP CONC.PLUG OPEN END PIPE W-19 ADD1-1/2" THREADEDPLUG INTO EXVALVE

MH-BGROUT PLUG

MH-CGROUT PLUG

MH-DGROUT PLUG
MH-S15' AIR GAP, GROUTPLUG, RECHANNELS TO N THROUGH
W-6 WORKDELETED
MH-APLUG 2 LATERALS EX.OUTLET N REMAINS ONLY.BEGIN MH IN GOOD SHAPE.

FIRE HYDRANTOUT OF SERVICE
MH-S2NO WORK REQUIRED LEFTAS IS. S TO N THROUGH.

W-4STRAIGHT LINEREPAIR 2-ROMAC 501COUPLINGS C900 DR14 PIPE MH-S35' AIR GAP CONC. PLUGRE-CHANNEL
BLDG.WATERSERVICE

MH-FGROUT PLUG

MH-GGROUT PLUG

MH-HGROUT PLUG
W-3 WORKDELETED NOTREQUIRED

EX VALVE LEFT AS IS FORFH ACROSS GIGGLING

FH REMAINS INSERVICE & ASEND LINE BLOWOFF LOCATION

MH-EGROUT PLUG
MH-S45' AIR GAPCONC. PLUGSRECHANNEL
AS BUILT PLANSDate Accepted March 13, 2020Resident Engineer Dana Van Horn Packet Page 783
4 W-8ROMAC 501 ENDCAP N/"T" FITTING.EXISTING F.H.REMAINS AS ENDLINE BLOW OFFLOCATION W-18VALVE CLOSED
ROMAC 501 ENDCAP W/ CONC.THRUST BLOCKCONC. PLUGGED
W-9 WORKDELETED
Locate flags
W16ROMAC 501 ENDCAP W/CONC.THRUST BLOCK
W-15 WORKDELETED
W-7STRAIGHTLINEREPAIR 2 ROMAC501 COUPLINGS 6"C-900 PVC DR 14 W-1110" ACPSTRAIGHTLINEREPAIR 2ROMAC 501COUPLINGSPVC DR14 PIPE W-1010" ACPSTRAIGHTLINEREPAIR 2 ROMAC501 COUPLINGSPVC DR14 PIPE MH-S65' AIR GAPCONC. PLUGSRECHANNEL
MH-SCONC.PLUGGED

MH-MFILLED W/DIRTLEFT AS IS
MH-S75' AIR GAPCONC. PLUGSRECHANNEL
MH-KCONC. PLUGGED
MH-JCONC. PLUGGED
MH-S55' AIR-GAPCONC. PLUGGED
MH-NCONC. PLUGGED
MH-LCONC. PLUGGED
efl

EXISTING FHREMAINS OUTOF SERVICE
MH-PCONC.PLUGGED
MH-RCONC.PLUGGED
MH-ICONC.PLUGGED MH-O
CONC.PLUGGED
MH-QCONC.PLUGGED

MH-UFILLED W/DIRTLEFT AS IS
EX. FH REMAINSOUT OFSERVICE
MH-TCONC.PLUGGED
AS BUILT PLANSDate Accepted March 13, 2020Resident Engineer Dana Van Horn Packet Page 784
APPENDIX 4
SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS:

SITE 10 AND MAIN GARRISON FIRE STATION
Packet Page 785

SAMPLING LOCATIONS

AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SITE 10 AND MAIN GARRISON FIRE STATION
PFAS Site Inspection Narrative Report
Former Fort Ord, California
Figure:

EXPLANATION
Date: 10/4/2023 17
NOTES:

Soil sample analytical results are in micrograms per
kilogram (μg/kg).

Only detections for PFAS with screening levels are
presented; see data tables for complete analytical results.

Bold/Magenta text: concentration in soil is greater than or equal to the residential soil screening level with a hazard quotient of 0.1.

Bold/Red text: concentration in soil is greater than the industrial/commercial soil screening level with a hazard quotient of 0.1.

ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS:

PFBA = perfluorobutanoic acid
PFHxA = perfluorohexanoic acid
PFOA = perfluorooctanoic acid
PFNA = perfluoronanoic acid
PFBS = perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
PFHxS = perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
PFOS = perfluorooctanesulfonic acid
AFFF = Aqueous Film Forming Foam
.
05 Miles
½
½
½
½
½
SB-10-14 DEPTH (ft) 10/25/2022
PFHxS 0.28 J
PFOS 0.11 J
PFHxS 0.21 J
PFOS 0.12 J
15 20
SB-10-10 DEPTH (ft) 9/22/2022
PFBA 1.8 J
PFHxA 5.3
PFOA 2.3
PFNA 4.2
PFBS 0.13 J
PFHxS 5
PFOS 196
PFOA 0.48 J
PFNA 0.32 J
PFHxS 0.8 J
PFOS 2.9
PFHxA 0.67 J
PFOA 0.51 J
PFNA 0.13 J
PFHxS 0.91 J
PFOS 1.8
1 10
5 SB-10-12 DEPTH (ft) 9/22/2022
PFBA 24.6
PFHxA 179
PFOA 21.4
PFNA 14.1
PFBS 0.34 J
PFHxS 37.6
PFOS 2990 JPFBA 0.87 J
PFHxA 5.3
PFOA 4.8
PFNA 1.2
PFBS 0.11 J
PFHxS 11
PFOS 33.1
PFBA 0.62 J
PFHxA 4.4
PFOA 2.1
PFNA 0.32 J
PFBS 0.24 J
PFHxS 10.2
PFOS 18.4
10 5
5 in
SB-10-13 DEPTH (ft) 9/22/2022
PFBA 1.6 J
PFHxA 2.3
PFOA 3.5
PFNA 7.5
PFHxS 7.3
PFOS 46.3
PFBA 0.59 J
PFHxA 1.6
PFOA 2.7
PFNA 5.2
PFHxS 4.4
PFOS 36.3
PFBA 0.35 J
PFHxA 0.98 J
PFOA 4.2
PFNA 2.3
PFHxS 3.5
PFOS 31.1
8 in
5 10
SB-10-11 DEPTH (ft) 9/22/2022
PFBA 1.4 J
PFHxA 2.5
PFOA 3.3
PFNA 2.1
PFHxS 1.9
PFOS 56.3
PFHxA 1.6
PFOA 6
PFNA 1.8
PFHxS 4.8
PFOS 122
PFOS 10 0.3 J
7 in
5 Conex Boxes
Site 10 - Former Burn Pit
Suspected AFFF Discharge Area
Bldg S-4403
Main Garrison Fire Station
(Bldg 4400)
Bldg 4401
SI Sites
Sampled Location
½ Soil boring .
0 100 200
Feet

CONTRACTOR

SHALL AVOID

DISTURBANCE OF

THESE AREAS
Packet Page 786
February, 2025
Agreement 00 5200 - 1 City of Seaside
Fort Ord Military Reservation
Property Demolition Project Phase 1B
SECTION 00 5200

SAMPLE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, dated this _______ day of February, 2025, by and between American Integrated Resources whose place of business is located at 2341 North Pacific Street, Orange, CA 92865 (“Contractor”), and the City of Seaside (“Owner”), acting under and by virtue of the authority vested in Owner by the laws of the State of California.

WHEREAS, Owner, by its Resolution No. 25- ___ adopted on the 17th day of July, 2025 awarded to Contractor the following Contract:

CONTRACT NUMBER AG 25-___
Fort Ord Military Reservation Property Demolition Project – Phase 1B (Re-bid) located at
General Jim Moore Blvd and Gigling Road
Seaside, CA 93955
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, Contractor and Owner agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 -SCOPE OF WORK OF THE CONTRACT

1.01 WORK OF THE CONTRACT
A. Contractor shall complete all Work specified in the Contract Documents, in accordance with the Specifications, Drawings, and all other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents (Work).

1.02 PRICE FOR COMPLETION OF THE WORK
A. Owner shall pay Contractor the following Contract Sum Two million five hundred eighty five thousand seven hundred and seven dollars and ninety five cents ($2,585,707.95) for completion of Work in accordance with Contract Documents as set forth in Contractor’s Bid, attached hereto.

ARTICLE 2 - COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION OF WORK

2.01 COMMENCEMENT OF WORK
A. At time of advertisement, the Notice of Award is expected to be issued on July 21st, 2025.

B. Contractor shall commence work on the date established in the Notice to Proceed C. At time of advertisement, the Notice to Proceed is expected to be issued on August 11th, 2025.

D. Owner reserves the right to modify or alter the Commencement Date.

2.02 COMPLETION OF WORK
A. Contractor shall achieve Substantial Completion of the entire contract within 120 Calendar Days from the Commencement Date and 15 Calendar days following substantial completion to achieve Final Completion.

B. At time of advertisement, Substantial Completion is estimated to be December 2025.

C. At time of advertisement, Final Completion is December, 2025.

ARTICLE 3 - PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES

3.01 Owner’s Project Manager
Packet Page 787
February, 2025
Agreement 00 5200 - 2 City of Seaside
Fort Ord Military Reservation
Property Demolition Project Phase 1B
A. Owner has designated Jean-Luc Delbecq, PE as its Project Manager to act as Owner’s Representative in all matters relating to the Project.

B. City Manager shall have final authority over all matters pertaining to the Contract Documents and shall have sole authority to modify the Contract Documents on behalf of Owner, to accept work, and to make decisions or actions binding on Owner, and shall have sole signature authority on behalf of Owner.

C. Owner may assign all or part of the Project Manager’s rights, responsibilities and duties to a Construction Manager, or other Owner Representative.

3.02 Owner’s Environmental Consultant
A. Vista Environmental Consulting furnished the Report related to Hazardous Materials and shall have the rights assigned to observe, inspect, and enforce the requirements of those noted Reports.

3.03 Engineer
A. Harris & Associates furnished the Plans and Technical Specification and shall have the rights assigned to Engineer in the Contract Documents.

ARTICLE 4 - LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FOR DELAY IN COMPLETION OF WORK

4.01 LIQUIDATED DAMAGE AMOUNTS
A. As liquidated damages for delay Contractor shall pay Owner Three Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($3,400) for each calendar day that expires after the time specified herein for Contractor to achieve Substantial Completion of the entire work, until achieved.

B. As liquidated damages for delay Contractor shall pay Owner Three Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($3,400) for each calendar day that expires after the time specified herein for Contractor to achieve Final Completion of the entire work, until achieved.

4.02 SCOPE OF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
A. Measures of liquidated damages shall apply cumulatively.

B. Limitations and stipulations regarding liquidated damages are set forth in Document 00 7200 (General Conditions).

ARTICLE 5 - CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

5.01 Contract documents consist of the following documents, including all changes, addenda, and modifications thereto:

Document 00 0101 Title Page
Document 00 0110 Table of Contents
Document 00 0115 List of Drawings
Document 00 3132 Geotechnical Data and Existing Conditions Document 00 5100 Notice of Award
Document 00 5200 Agreement
Document 00 5500 Notice to Proceed
Document 00 6113.13 Construction Performance Bond
Document 00 6113.16 Construction Labor and Material Payment Bond Document 00 6290 Escrow Agreement for Security Deposits Document 00 6325 Substitution Request Form
Document 00 6530 Release of Claims
Document 00 6536 Guaranty
Document 00 7200 General Conditions
Document 00 7316 Supplementary Conditions – Insurance and Indemnification
Document 00 9113 Addenda
Document 02 1000
Packet Page 788
February, 2025
Agreement 00 5200 - 3 City of Seaside
Fort Ord Military Reservation
Property Demolition Project Phase 1B
through 31 2323 Technical Specifications
Drawings
Hazardous Material Survey Reports
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)

5.02 There are no contract documents other than those listed above. The contract documents may only be amended, modified, or supplemented as provided in document 00 7200 (General Conditions).

ARTICLE 6 - MISCELLANEOUS

6.01 Terms and abbreviations used in this agreement are defined in document 00 7200 (general conditions) and section 01 4200 (references and definitions) and will have the meaning indicated therein.

6.02 It is understood and agreed that in no instance are the persons signing this agreement for or on behalf of owner or acting as an employee, agent, or representative of owner, liable on this agreement or any of the contract documents, or upon any warranty of authority, or otherwise, and it is further understood and agreed that liability of owner is limited and confined to such liability as authorized or imposed by the contract documents or applicable law.

6.03 In entering into a public works contract or a subcontract to supply goods, services or materials pursuant to a public works contract, contractor or subcontractor offers and agrees to assign to the awarding body all rights, title and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under section 4 of the clayton act (15 u.s.c. §15) or under the cartwright act (chapter 2 (commencing with §16700) of part 2 of division 7 of the business and professions code), arising from purchases of goods, services or materials pursuant to the public works contract or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time owner tenders final payment to contractor, without further acknowledgment by the parties.

6.04 Copies of the general prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the contract, as determined by director of the state of California department of industrial relations, are deemed included in the contract documents and on file at owner’s office, and shall be made available to any interested party on request. Pursuant to California labor code §§ 1860 and 1861, in accordance with the provisions of section 3700 of the labor code, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to his/her employees. Contractor represents that it is aware of the provisions of section 3700 of the labor code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and contractor shall comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of the contract documents.

6.05 During the term of this agreement, contractor warrants that it is currently registered with the department of industrial relations and qualified to perform public work consistent with labor code section 1725.5. Contractor further warrants that any subcontractors who are subject to public contract code section 4104, are registered and qualified to perform public work consistent with labor code section 1725.5.

6.06 This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the department of industrial relations.

6.07 This agreement and the contract documents shall be deemed to have been entered into in the county of Monterey, state of California, and governed in all respects by California law (excluding choice of law rules). The exclusive venue for all disputes or litigation hereunder shall be in the superior court for the county of Monterey.

Packet Page 789
February, 2025
Agreement 00 5200 - 4 City of Seaside
Fort Ord Military Reservation
Property Demolition Project Phase 1B
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this agreement in quadruplicate the day and year first above written.

CONTRACTOR: [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] OWNER: The City of Seaside By: ______________________________ By:
(Signature) (Signature)
______________________________
(Print Name) (Print Name)
Its: _______________________________
Title (If Corporation: Chairman, President (Title)
or Vice President)
Attest:

City Clerk Signature
By: ______________________________
(Signature) (Print Name)
______________________________
(Name)
Its: _______________________________
Title (If Corporation: Secretary, Assistant
Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or
Assistant Treasurer

END OF SECTION
Packet Page 790

Seaside City CouncilJuly 17, 2025

Seaside City Council
July 17, 2025