Agenda packet, regular meeting — Shafter City Council, June 2, 2026 (part 3 of 4)

AWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND

INSPECTION SERVICES
- 2 -
firms will allow the Building Department to assign work based on project needs, consultant expertise, and availability, thereby improving operational flexibility and maintaining efficient permit processing timelines.

The proposed agreements are for a one-year term beginning July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027. Combined expenditures under the agreements will not exceed $300,000 and will be administered collectively, allowing staff to utilize any of the consultants as needed without exceeding the approved budget authority.

FISCAL IMPACT
No additional budget action is required. The proposed FY 2026-27 Building Department operating budget includes $300,000 in professional services funding for plan review and inspection support. Costs associated with these services will be recovered through building permit and application fees, resulting in no net fiscal impact to the City.

CEQA ANALYSIS
The action is not defined as a “project” per Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines because the approval of a professional services agreement for building plan review and inspection services and therefore, it is the creation of a governmental funding mechanism or other fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to a specific project that can result in a potentially significant impact and not subject to CEQA.

APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY
Not Applicable

ATTACHMENTS

1. PSA - JAS Pacific - 26-27 FY PDF

2. JAS- Fee Schedule - EXHIBIT A

3. PSA - CSG Consultants - 26-27 FY PDF

4. CSG - Statement of Qualifications - 26-27 FY - EXHIBIT A

5. PSA - Cornerstone Municipal Services - 26-27 FY PDF

6. Cornerstone Municipal Services - Statement of Qualifications - 26-27 FY -

EXHIBIT A

Page 304 of 547 ends

CITY OF SHAFTER

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of , 2026 by and between the City of Shafter, a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 336 Pacific Avenue, Shafter, California 93263 (“City”), and J a s o n Ad d iso n Sm it h Co n s u lt in g Se r v ic e s, I nc . DBA J AS Pa c if ic , a California Corporation with its principal place of business at Upland, Ca (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.

RECITALS
A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of professional services for the following project: Building Plan Review and Building Inspection Services (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”).

B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services.

C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Services.

Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the July 1, 2026; Legal Services Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

2. Compensation.
a. Subject to paragraph 2(b) below, the City shall pay for such services in accordance with Exhibit “A.”
b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of $300,000 dollars. This amount is to cover all printing and related costs, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses.

Periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of receipt of an invoice which includes a detailed description of the work performed. Payments to Consultant for work performed will be made on a monthly billing basis.

3. Additional Work.

If changes in the work seem merited by Consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed in the following manner: a letter outlining the changes shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant with a statement of estimated changes in fee or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services,

Page 305 of 547 ends

or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement.

4. Maintenance of Records.

Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City.

5. Term of Agreement:

The City may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. If the City finds it necessary to terminate this Agreement without cause before Project(s) completion, Consultant shall be entitled to be paid in full for those Services adequately completed prior to the notification of termination. Consultant may terminate this Agreement only upon 30 calendar days’ written notice to the City only in the event of City’s failure to perform in accordance with the terms of this agreement through no fault of the Consultant.

6. Delays in Performance.
a. Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; war; riots and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage or judicial restraint.
b. Should such circumstances occur, the non-performing party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement.

7. Compliance with Law.
a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations of the federal, state, and local government, including Cal/OSHA requirements. b. If required, Consultant shall assist the City, as requested, in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and/ or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement.

8. Standard of Care.

Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions.

Page 306 of 547 ends

9. Assignment and Subconsultant.

Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City, which may be withheld for any reason. Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates, and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder.

10. Independent Contractor.

Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided.

11. Insurance.

Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section.
a. Minimum Policy Limits Required
(i) The following insurance limits are required for the Agreement:

Combined Single Limit
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence/ $2,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property
damage
Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per accident or disease Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions)
b. Evidence Required
Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein.
c. Qualifying Insurers
(i) All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies, as determined by the City, which satisfy the following minimum requirements:

Page 307 of 547 ends

d. Additional Insurance Provisions
(i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification.
(ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
(iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) Neither the City nor any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement.

12. Indemnification.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

13. Verification of Employment Eligibility.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time.

14. Laws and Venue.

This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of Kern, State of California.

15. Termination or Abandonment.

The City and Consultant have the right to terminate work under this Agreement as set

Page 308 of 547 ends

forth in the agreement under “Term of Agreement”.

16. Organization.

Consultant shall assign Jeff Janes as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City.

17. Limitation of Agreement.

This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work include in the Project described above.

18. Notice.

Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to:

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City of Shafter Jeff Janes
336 Pacific Avenue JAS Pacific
Shafter, California 93263 13925 City Center Drive, Ste. 220 Attn: City Manager Chino Hills, CA 91709
and shall be effective upon receipt thereof.

19. Third Party Rights.

Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant.

20. Equal Opportunity Employment.

Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination.

21. Entire Agreement.

This Agreement, with its exhibits, represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by any person which are not

Page 309 of 547 ends

incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both Parties hereto. This is an integrated Agreement.

22. Severability.

The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the provisions unenforceable, invalid, or illegal.

23. Successors and Assigns.

This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators and assigns of each party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties, or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void.

24. Non-Waiver.

None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either party unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing.

25. Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

26. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants.

City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects.

27. Prohibited Interests.

Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no director, official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

Page 310 of 547 ends

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SHAFTER

AND JAS PACIFIC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SHAFTER JAS Pacific
By: By: __________________________________
Lance Lippincott
City Manager Its: _________President______________
Printed Name:__Raj Patel ____________
ATTEST:

By: ________________________
City Clerk

Page 311 of 547 ends

13925 City Center Drive - Suite 220 Chino Hills, CA 91709 Fee Amendment
Effective July 1, 2026
JAS s hourly rates for contract coming year are provided in the table below. These rates are for FY 26-27 and hourly rates are a 3.8% increase from previous rates.

Fee Schedule
JAS will coordinate the pickup and return of all plans to JAS via JAS staff or a licensed courier service. Plan review is based on a percentage of the plan check fees and includes the initial plan review and two subsequent reviews. Additional reviews, deferred submittals, revisions, and RFIs will be charged at the appropriate hourly rate per the Schedule of Compensation. RFIs for large developments will be performed at an hourly rate, and turnaround times will be agreed upon in advance with the City.

Schedule of Compensation
Description of Service All Inclusive Fee / Hourly Rate
Off-Site Building Plan Review (by Percentage)
Full Building Plan Review by Percentage 65% of Building Plan Check Fees Structural Only Plan Review by Percentage 35% of Building Plan Check Fees Expedited Plan Review by Percentage 95% of Building Plan Check Fees Off-Site Building Plan Review (Hourly Rates) Current Hourly Rates FY 26-27 Hourly Rates Building or Fire Plan Review $130 $135
Building or Fire Plan Review Professional Engineer (PE or FPE) $150 $156 Structural Only Plan Review $155 $161
Grading Plan Review Civil Engineer $150 $156
Expedited Plan Review (Hourly) $1.5x Hourly Rate $1.5x Hourly Rate Residential PV System 1-15 KW $130 Flat Fee includes initial plan check and one backcheck.
$135
Building Department Services
Certified Combination Building Inspector $120 plus mileage reimbursement for inspections completed within
the City limits based on the
current IRS rate
$125
Schedule of Compensation Footnotes:

Services rendered outside normal business hours Monday through Friday 8:00 AM 5:00 PM, including weekend and holidays will be billed at either 1.5x or 2x for holidays per the Fee Schedule.

On July 1 of each year following the contract start year, JAS will initiate, and hourly rate increase based on change in CPI for the applicable region.

EXHIBIT - A

Page 312 of 547 ends

CITY OF SHAFTER

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of , 2026 by and between the City of Shafter, a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 336 Pacific Avenue, Shafter, California 93263 (“City”), and CSG Co ns u lta n t s a California limited liability partnership with its principal place of business at Paso Robles, Ca (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.

B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services.

C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Services.

Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the May 15, 2026; Legal Services Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

3. Additional Work.

Page 313 of 547 ends

or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement.

4. Maintenance of Records.

5. Term of Agreement:

8. Standard of Care.

Page 314 of 547 ends

9. Assignment and Subconsultant.

10. Independent Contractor.

11. Insurance.

Page 315 of 547 ends

13. Verification of Employment Eligibility.

14. Laws and Venue.

This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of Kern, State of California.

15. Termination or Abandonment.

The City and Consultant have the right to terminate work under this Agreement as set

Page 316 of 547 ends

forth in the agreement under “Term of Agreement”.

16. Organization.

Consultant shall assign Ali Annan as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City.

17. Limitation of Agreement.

This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work include in the Project described above.

18. Notice.

CITY: CONSULTANT
City of Shafter Ali Annan
336 Pacific Avenue CSG Consultants
Shafter, California 93263 809 9th Street, Suite 2A
Attn: City Manager Paso Robles, CA 93446
and shall be effective upon receipt thereof.

19. Third Party Rights.

Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant.

20. Equal Opportunity Employment.

21. Entire Agreement.

This Agreement, with its exhibits, represents the entire understanding of City and

Page 317 of 547 ends

Consultant as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both Parties hereto. This is an integrated Agreement.

22. Severability.

The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the provisions unenforceable, invalid, or illegal.

23. Successors and Assigns.

24. Non-Waiver.

None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either party unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing.

25. Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

26. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants.

City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects.

27. Prohibited Interests.

Page 318 of 547 ends

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SHAFTER

AND CSG CONSULTANTS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SHAFTER CSG CONSULTANTS
By: By: __________________________________
Lance Lippincott
City Manager Its: ___________President____________
Printed Name:____Cyrus Kianpour______
ATTEST:

By: ________________________
City Clerk

Page 319 of 547 ends

809 9th Street, Suite 2A
Paso Robles, CA 93446
805.693.2670 phone
650.522.2599 fax
www.csgengr.com

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE
City of Shafter
For Building Division Services
EXHIBIT - "A"

Page 320 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
Table of Contents
SECTION 1 Cover Letter 1
SECTION 2 Building Division Services 3
SECTION 3 Additional Services 9
SECTION 4 Organizational Chart 11
SECTION 5 Project Examples 13
SECTION 6 Fee Schedule 14
SECTION 7 Appendix (Resumes) 15

Page 321 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
809 9th Street, Suite 2A, Paso Robles, CA 93446
(805) 693-2670 phone | (650) 522.2599 fax | www.csgengr.com Cover Letter
May 15, 2026
City of Shafter
Dennis Fidler
Building Official
336 Pacific Ave.

Shafter, CA 93263
Re: Statement of Qualifications for Building Division Services Dear Mr. Fidler,
Thank you for the opportunity for CSG Consultants (CSG) to present its statement of qualifications to the City of Shafter for Building Division Services. CSG understands the City has been experiencing a high volume of building permit submittals and is interested in supplementing various plan review and contract building services to help minimize response times and improve customer service. We support numerous public agencies with our services, and our staff possesses a thorough understanding of state and city building laws/codes, while maintaining the highest level of professionalism and customer service. Based on the City’s needs, CSG can provide the City of Shafter with building division services that include the following:

Building Plan Review
Building Inspection
CASp Services
Plan Check Engineer
Remote Permit Processing
Permit Technician
CSG is an employee-owned, California corporation and works solely for public agencies, serving as a seamless extension of municipal staff. We currently furnish planning, environmental, sustainability, building and safety, fire prevention, code enforcement, public works, and a host of additional services to over 250 municipal clients throughout California.

For more than 35 years, CSG has had a solutions-oriented approach to our work, leveraging our team’s extensive experience and technical expertise to address a wide range of client needs. We have a proven track record working with many jurisdictions in the region, as well as specific abilities to deliver project expediting services. Ali Annan, P.E., CBO, CASp, will serve as the primary contact for the City and can be readily available for meetings. His contact information is as follows:

Ali Annan, P.E., CBO, CASp, Regional Building Plan Check Director 806 9th Street, Suite 2A, Paso Robles, CA 93446
(661) 599-5709 Mobile | (805) 693-2656 Office | [email protected] We look forward to an opportunity to assist the City of Shafter with its building division services. Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Annan should you have any questions or require additional information.

Sincerely,
Cyrus Kianpour, PE, PLS
President, CSG Consultants
1 S E C T I O N

Page 322 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
2 COMPANY PROFILE
CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) is an employee-owned, California company with our headquarters in Foster City, and additional offices in Paso Robles, San Jose, Pleasanton, Newman, Orange, and Fresno. Founded in 1991, CSG performs work solely for public agencies, eliminating the potential for conflicts of interest. In this way, we can focus exclusively on the specific needs of our municipal clients. The majority of the 350+ individuals within our firm have provided public agency services throughout their entire careers. Our talented personnel bring a wealth of ideas and experiences, having held positions with communities facing similar development opportunities as the City of Shafter.

NAME OF FIRM: CSG Consultants, Inc.

POINTS OF CONTACT: Ali Annan, PE,CBO, CASp | Project Manager/Principal Plan Check Engineer HEADQUARTERS: 550 Pilgrim Drive, Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 522-2500 phone, (650) 522-2599 fax
www.csgengr.com | [email protected]
REGIONAL OFFICES: 3150 Almaden Expressway #255, San Jose, CA 95118 3875 Hopyard Road, Suite 141, Pleasanton, CA 94588
930 Fresno Street, Newman, CA 95360
3707 W. Garden Grove Boulevard, Orange, CA 92868
1303 J Street, Suite 270, Sacramento, CA 95814
LOCAL OFFICE 809 9th Street, Suite 2A, Paso Robles, CA 93446 YEARS IN BUSINESS: 35 ● Founded in 1991
TYPE OF BUSINESS: California Corporation ● Incorporated June 15, 2000 ● Federal ID: 91-2053749

STAFF COMPOSITION
Our multi-disciplined municipal services staff consists of the following types of professionals:
 Building Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Planning Professionals  Fire Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Code Enforcement Officers  Structural Engineers  Grading Improvement Plan Reviewers & Inspectors  Plan Review Engineers  Civil Engineers
 Fire Protection Engineers  Construction Managers
 Building Officials  Construction Inspectors
 CASp Professionals  Information Technology Professionals  Permit Technicians  Sustainability Professionals

Page 323 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
3 Building Division Services

APPROACH TO WORK
CSG’s team members are selected to best support the specific needs of the agency and will deliver exceptional service through the application of technical expertise, knowledge of municipal processes and procedures, efficient and effective customer care, and application of code compliance combined with innovative and helpful alternatives. Our extensive experience in furnishing comprehensive building and fire life safety services to jurisdictions provides a consistent, strong technical foundation to all projects. From providing leading-edge digital plan review and online plan check status reporting to delivering faster-thanscheduled turnaround times and code interpretations, CSG will deliver the highest quality services to the Agency. CSG’s approach to work includes the following methodologies and key benefits:
 A wealth of fully committed and qualified personnel. We maintain staff that are fully licensed and certified at the highest level of industry standards. To keep our personnel on the industry’s leading edge, many serve as instructors and lecturers and sit on boards and committees for organizations developing and implementing important code regulations. We also keep current with the latest in procedures and use of products by attending regional, state and national training opportunities and industry provided product/materials training.
 Customized, responsive services. We are skilled at assessing time commitments, developing accurate work plans and applying dedicated, professional personnel with the skills and experience best suited for the project. We can quickly fine-tune staffing levels to match or adjust to changes in plan review, inspection, and front-counter activity and ensure responsiveness to customers. With our digital plan review capabilities, we can utilize plan review resources from any of our regional offices.

In addition, we excel at coordinating with all agency departments as well as outside agencies.  Rapid turnarounds and expedited services. With extensive experience in both code application and the digital plan review process, our staff excels at performing expeditious turnarounds while delivering thorough and accurate reviews. We easily match and more often beat any required review turnaround deadlines.
 Leading-edge, cost-saving technology and methods. CSG delivers a suite of digital options— speedy digital plan reviews and electronic versions of plan comments; an easy-to-use online application for plan submittal, tracking and approval of digital plans; and available full scanning and archiving services. In addition, through knowledge gained from service to over 350 public agencies, we are constantly improving and adapting to provide our clients with the most cost-effective services.  Environmentally friendly practices. Our corporate policy on sustainability supports a healthy environment, reduces our carbon footprint and promotes environmental stewardship through environmentally preferable purchasing and other actions including use of a digital plan review system that bypasses paper consumption, and use of duplexing and recycled, post-consumer content paper when printing is necessary.

SECTION 2

Page 324 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
4 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
CSG’s team of professionals is ready to assist in all aspects of plan review and to focus on the special needs and requirements of each of our clients. We pledge thorough and accurate reviews and prompt turnaround times, and offer proven digital plan review services and comprehensive online status reports. CSG serves as an active partner, working as a seamless extension of our public agency clients in performing the requested services and working closely with the development community and public as directed.

Compliance Standards
Our engineers and plan reviewers carefully review all plans and documents for compliance with building codes, fire codes, energy conservation standards, and accessibility regulations adopted by the State of California, and all local policies and ordinances including but not limited to:
 California Building Code, Volumes 1 and 2
 California Residential Code
 California Electrical Code
 California Plumbing Code
 California Mechanical Code
 California Fire Code
 California Energy Code
 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen)
 California Existing Building Code
 California Health and Safety Code
 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards as adopted and referenced by the State of California (California Code of Regulations, Title-19)
 State Historical Building Code
 NPDES/WQMP/SWPPP Compliance
 Local adopted ordinances and amendments relative to building, fire and municipal codes, including project Conditions of Approval from other agency departments, divisions, and regulating agencies Digital Plan Review
CSG has been providing digital plan
review services for over 20 years,
leading the consultant field with this
ground-breaking service. All paper plans
submitted to CSG for building and fire
plan review are immediately scanned
into digital files and stored on CSG’s
servers for quick and easy access by both our clients and our plan reviewers.

Our plan reviewers furnish electronic versions of their plan comments conforming to each client’s established correction list templates. Any additional forms utilized by the agency will be incorporated into the correction comments and returned with the appropriate recommendations. Plan check comments can be delivered electronically by email or other agency-approved means, enabling staff to immediately modify CSG’s checklist for incorporation with other department comments. We provide convenient, environmentally friendly digital storage of all construction-related documents, and on request, can provide clients with a set of digitally scanned plans at no additional cost.

Leading the field in
digital plan review
services for over 20
years.

Page 325 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
5 In addition, for jurisdictions requesting a pure digital plan review workflow, we can enable an applicant to submit digital files—with no size limitations— directly to CSG via our web-based application. Our application includes an online portal for the applicant/jurisdiction to retrieve comments and markedup digital plans including redlines. Importantly, this service tracks the status of all submittals and re-submittals until the plans have been approved.

Key features of our digital plan review service include:
 Efficient. Plans are pushed to plan review staff the same day they are received.
 User-friendly. CSG developed its own online portal specifically to manage the electronic file submittal process. Through use of this interface, the applicant is no longer faced with size restrictions on email attachments or required to learn complex file transfer settings.  Proven. We have provided a digital plan review option to our clients for over 20 years.
 Non-Proprietary. CSG’s electronic review process is 100% PDF-based with no additional software required to view redlines.

Online Plan Check Status
CSG offers a convenient service allowing clients to
check plan review status and comments online. By
accessing our secure Plan Check Status website,
agency staff as well as authorized applicants can view
their project documents and plans and communicate
with the specific plan checker via e-mail. Staff and
authorized applicants can download comments upon completion of the plan check.

There is no additional cost for this service.

Plans Pickup and Delivery
CSG will coordinate pickup and delivery of plans and other materials from/to the agency via CSG personnel or an approved alternative service.

Green Building and LEED Accreditation
Our Building Division team is experienced in plan review and inspection for compliance with CALGreen and local green building ordinances and includes LEED Accredited Professionals. In addition, CSG Consultants has the qualifications necessary to assist with both the development of policy and the implementation of green and sustainable building practices. CSG’s Sustainability Programs division can assist, for example, with construction and demolition debris recycling programs and public outreach to the building industry.

CASp Review Services
We understand California Building Departments are required to have CASp certified staff in place and available for technical questions and interpretations. Our CASp certified team members are knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possess the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. When requested and in accordance with current regulations, CSG can provide CASp certified professionals to review plans for accessibility and to facilitate compliance with regulations.

OSHPD 3 Reviews
Our professional engineers and certified plans examiners are well-versed in the differences between CBC and OSHPD 3 facilities and have successfully completed OSHPD 3 plan reviews for multiple client agencies.

All paper plans
submitted to CSG
are immediately
scanned into digital
files for quick and
easy access by our
clients and plan
reviewers.

Page 326 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
6 Third-Party Plan Review Services
Subject to the Building Official’s approval, CSG can offer comprehensive, cost-effective third-party plan review services to our public agency clients on projects for which applicants may be seeking plan review turnaround times that cannot be readily accommodated by building department staff. Under such third-party agreements, and the agency’s approval, CSG negotiates plan review fees and review schedules directly with the permit applicant, with CSG’s fees paid by the applicant.

AVAILABILITY AND CUSTOMER SERVICE
We clearly understand the importance of our role in the success of the City of Shafter and commit to providing project stakeholders and City staff with the highest level of service while functioning as a seamless extension of the City. We believe effective communication, responsiveness and an intense focus on customer service are essential to developing and continuing a successful working relationship between City staff, project stakeholders and CSG’s team members.

Office Hours and Meeting Availability
Plan Review
CSG plan checkers are available for inquiries anytime during normal business hours via phone or email, Monday through Friday. Our plan checkers can typically respond to the City for all questions or requests generated during any plan review on the same day, but no later than the following day a request is received.

To assist the City of Shafter, we can also meet in-person with City staff and project stakeholders or can utilize video conferencing with all parties involved.

Additionally, we recognize the value of pre-design consultation with prospective applicants and are available to provide this service at no additional cost. Our designated Project Manager and/or technical staff will be available in-person for consultation and meetings with a reasonable lead time.

Inspection
CSG inspectors can be ready to provide services upon request to CSG’s designated project manager. We are flexible and can alter our hours to meet the City’s needs. Evening and weekend inspections for special construction needs can be accommodated with sufficient notice. CSG staff can typically respond to the City for all questions or requests generated during field inspections on the same day, but no later than the following day a request is received.

We recognize the
value of pre-design
consultation and are
available to provide
this important
service.

Page 327 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
7 PLAN CHECK TURNAROUND TIMES
CSG strives to provide the highest quality and most timely service in the industry. We take pride in maintaining the requested plan review times for all our clients—even delivering faster than our own deadlines. CSG will ensure that all building and safety duties and follow-up actions will be performed in a timely and responsive manner. The following are CSG’s proposed plan check turnaround times:

TYPE OF REVIEW

INITIAL REVIEW
(BUSINESS
DAYS)2

RE-CHECK
(BUSINESS
DAYS)2
Residential New Construction 10 5
Residential Additions 10 5
Small Residential Remodels 10 5
Commercial New Construction & Large/Complex Projects1 15 7 Commercial Additions 10 5
Small Commercial Remodels/Tenant Improvements 10 5
Expedited 5 5
1 Turnaround time may vary with the complexity and magnitude of the project. If a review is anticipated to take longer than the maximum turnaround time, CSG will notify the City’s representative and negotiate additional time required to ensure an appropriate level of review.
2 The number of working days associated with the plan check turnaround time is based on time of project submittal.

The first working day will be the day the project is received by CSG if submitted by 12:00 PM. For a project that is received by CSG after 12:00 PM, the first working day will be the next business day.

Expedited Plan Check Services
At the City’s request, we can perform plan check services on an accelerated schedule based on the fees indicated in our fee schedule.

Page 328 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
8 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES
CSG provides fully integrated, multi-disciplined building inspection services for residential, commercial, and industrial projects. Our inspection personnel have an outstanding mixture of technical expertise and experience in all construction types. We provide experienced, ICC certified inspectors who work with a team approach to ensure compliance with applicable codes and requirements and provide solutions to mitigate potential risks and safety hazards. Using well-honed customer service and communication skills our inspectors excel at educating stakeholders to keep projects moving forward. Our inspectors also utilize current technologies and equipment to view plans and documents, research related code requirements, document field conditions and progress, and share that information with stakeholders while in the field.

Key services include but are not limited to the following:

Providing inspection services to ensure project compliance with State adopted codes and local amendments including building, electrical, mechanical and plumbing codes
Offering code interpretation and education
Seamlessly integrating into client organizations and consistently enforcing policies and procedures
Addressing and resolving inquiries
Maintaining records and files
Providing all vehicles, fuel, maintenance and other equipment necessary for inspectors to carry out duties.

PERMIT TECHNICIAN SERVICES (REMOTE)
CSG has highly qualified staff available to provide Permit Technician services.

These frontline, first-response services are vital to the success of the entire building and safety permit process as they often set the tone for the applicant whether a homeowner, contractor, or design professional. CSG handpicks exceptionally qualified personnel who can function as seamless extensions of the agency’s team, understand the importance of exemplary customer service, and have knowledge of the inner workings of building departments and thorough familiarity with the building application and permit process.

CSG's permit processing staff is trained in customer service and helping to facilitate and expedite the permit process. Our staff members can perform quick assessments of each customer’s needs and ensure that they are served appropriately. They are familiar with State Contractors License Law and ensure that permits are issued to properly licensed contractors. CSG’s permit technicians are also familiar with multiple permit software systems and will quickly gain proficiency with the software that has been customized for the City. Our staff is knowledgeable and experienced with permit processing functions including:

Providing the public with appropriate forms and handouts Processing permit applications and issuing permits using the City’s software Accepting plans, documents, structural calculations and energy reports for permit processing Routing plans to building and other departments and agencies Performing document control, ensuring permit file integrity, and maintaining status of plans and documents during the permit process.

Preparing plan check letters to be sent to applicants
Assisting the public with completing applications and other required forms Preparing documents and reports; providing permit record materials requested from the public; researching and compiling documents for compliance with Public Records Act (PRA) requests.

CSG provides all
vehicles, fuel,
maintenance, and
other equipment
necessary for
inspectors to carry
out duties, with
no additional
charges.

Page 329 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
9 Additional Services
In addition to building division services, CSG also offers the following services for the City’s consideration:

FIRE PLAN REVIEW SERVICES
Our team of professionals is ready to assist in all aspects of plan review and to focus on the special needs and requirements of each of our clients. We pledge thorough and accurate reviews and prompt turnaround times, and offer proven digital plan review services and comprehensive online status reports. CSG serves as an active partner, working as a seamless extension of our public agency clients in performing the requested services and working closely with the development community and public as directed.

Multi-faceted Expertise
CSG furnishes plan review for fire and life safety, fire department access and water supply, wildland urban interface, fire protection systems, and special hazards for all structures with emphasis on the unique needs and requirements of each of our clients. We have expertise in the special requirements and risks associated with industrial and commercial buildings as well as single- and multi-family complexes. All fire plan review and inspection personnel are thoroughly trained in and familiar with jurisdictional processes, working with multiple agency departments, and serving the public.

FIRE INSPECTION SERVICES
CSG offers experienced, CSFM/ICC certified inspectors. Typical responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
providing inspection services for fire and life safety systems and construction, in addition to maintaining records and files concerning fire permits and code administration documents. We offer fully integrated, multi-disciplined fire inspection services for residential, commercial, and industrial projects, and are experienced in all construction types. Our inspectors ensure compliance with applicable codes and requirements by identifying code violations, offering solutions to developers, property owners and tenants on potential risks and safety hazards, and by working as a team to correct violations. Our inspection staff easily integrates into client organizations, consistently implementing policies and procedures and remaining transparent to applicants and customers. Specific inspections include, but are not limited to:
 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems
 Engineered and Pre-engineered Fire Protection Systems (e.g., kitchen hoods, spray booths, clean agent systems)
 Fire Alarm Systems
 Development Improvements (e.g., fire hydrant and other types of water supply systems, fire department access, underground fire Services)
 Fire Code Maintenance/Life Safety (e.g., permitted sites, public and private schools, State licensed facilities, hotels, motels and apartment complexes)

CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
CSG maintains experienced Code Enforcement Officers who are fully trained, licensed and certified through the California Association of Code Enforcement Officers (CACEO) and the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) for any code enforcement or health and safety challenge presented.

Code Enforcement Supervision
CSG can provide interim staffing to oversee an agency’s code enforcement personnel and day-to-day activities, ensuring, for example that procedures are followed, caseloads are managed effectively, and that code enforcement officers work fairly and consistently with property owners and reporting parties. Our personnel are adept at serving as liaisons for Code Enforcement units when interacting with members of SECTION 3

Page 330 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
10 other departments. CSG Code Enforcement Managers may be called upon to attend department meetings, committee meetings and City Council meetings as a code enforcement program progresses. They can be also available to assist code enforcement officers, law enforcement, and other City staff as well as representatives of other agencies on field visits when needed. In addition, CSG personnel can review existing code enforcement programs—look for efficiencies and help establish appropriate policies and procedures to facilitate the mission of the code enforcement unit.

Code Enforcement Services
CSG’s Code Enforcement Officers work to identify code violations and engage stakeholders and responsible parties to correct code violations consistent with municipal and state codes tailored to the specific needs of the agency. Examples of codes and ordinances enforced include:

Zoning codes
Building codes
Housing codes
Public nuisance codes
State health & safety codes
Special concerns such as work and safety regulations, short term rental enforcement, massage and human trafficking, and marijuana dispensaries
Our Code Enforcement Officers have extensive experience and skills in the following key areas:

Public outreach and education to stakeholders, citizens, businesses, and various organizations.

Addressing compliance with applicable local, state, and federal laws Proactively patrolling the community on a regular basis to detect applicable violations The ability and skill to interact with residents and other community investors in a calm, professional, and empathetic fashion
Regular reporting to designated City staff on activities performed Procedural knowledge of law enforcement principles, including PC832 certifications Executing and serving warning and notice letters to violators.

Responding to public questions and providing clarification when requested Code enforcement program review and analysis
Preparing administrative remedy notices including administrative citations Conducting administrative hearings
Preparing program documentation and staff reports as well as committee and City Council presentations Testifying on behalf of clients in administrative hearings or criminal court License and permit application review and processing
Coordination of activities with multiple departments including Building, Planning, Community Development, Police and City Attorneys
Providing information on municipal regulations to property owners, residents, businesses, the public, and agency departments
Although a majority of our results are gained by voluntary compliance, our services include a full range of code enforcement activities, including:

Enforcing administrative abatements and managing receiverships Testifying in public hearings and court proceedings on behalf of the agency Facilitating settlement agreements
Recommending changes to municipal codes
Serving as expert witnesses in administrative, civil, or criminal venues

Page 331 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
11 Organizational Chart

B U I L D I N G S E R V I C E S S T A F F
CSG’s business model is to serve as an extension of municipal staff— working solely for public agencies and not for private developers. Our team members excel at customer service and maintain CSG’s high standards of integrity, responsiveness, and work quality. We do this seamlessly, minimizing disruption to the City’s existing workflows and processes. No subcontractors will be utilized for this project. We take pride in providing project managers who have a variety of project experience, who are motivated to excel in their field, and who have technical and customer service skills that are crucial to on-the-job success. Resumes for key staff have been provided in the appendix, additional resumes can be provided upon request. 4 S E C T I O N
*Ali Annan, PE, CBO, CASp
Regional Building Plan Check Director

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

VICE PRESIDENT AND REGIONAL OPERATION DIRECTOR
*Mike Brinkman, CBO, CMP, CASp
Vice President of Building Services
Crickett Brinkman
Regional Operations Director

BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
Randy Brumley, PE
Principal Plan Check Engineer
Phiroze Wadia, SE, LEED AP
Principal Structural Engineer
Stuart England, CASp
Principal Plans Examiner
Annette Mayfield, CASp
Senior Plans Examiner
Priska Cheng, PE, CASp
Senior Plans Examiner
Rafael Cornejo, PE, CASp, CBO
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Ashkan Arya, PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Jonathan Hurst
Senior Plans Examiner
Jimmy Le, PE, ME
Associate Plan Check Engineer
Christine Uhalde
Associate Plans Examiner
Bryan Montes, CPE
Associate Plans Examiner Jared Claypool
Associate Plans Examiner
JuanCarlos Jimenez
Associate Plan Check Engineer

PERMIT TECHNICIANS
Micayla Martins
Supervising Permit Technician
Theresa Hartman
Senior Permit Technician

BUILDING INSPECTION
Joshua Laupua, CBO
Supervising Building Inspector
Kenneth Cabral, CBO, MCP
Supervising Building Inspector
Mason Vandenberg
Supervising Building Inspector
Alex Garsia
Building Inspector II
Craig Weese
Building Inspector II
Arturo Macias
Building Inspector I
Alec Whitsitt
Building Inspector I
A.J. Ram
Building Inspector I
C.J. Pulido
Building Inspector I
Thunderstorm Vue
Building Inspector I

Page 332 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
12 COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE
Our People
Our clients benefit from the expertise of our team members who hold a wide variety of project experiences and are motivated to achieve the highest level of technical proficiency and certification. Knowing technical excellence is vital to successful service to our clients and to meeting their jurisdictions’ level of safety and code compliance, our team members are ICC certified, include registered engineers, and possess additional required professional certifications. They routinely update their knowledge and skills through attendance of specialized training classes and continuing certification seminars in the most current building codes and standards as well as approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety practices used in the industry. In addition, we understand that integrity, responsive customer service, and excellent communication and interpersonal skills are critical to on-the-job success, and we actively seek these qualities in our team members.

We also support our team members in their participation in and contributions to the many important associations and organizations within our industry. Many of our team members hold or have held key positions within the organizations listed below and have served as in-demand instructors and trainers.

League of California Cities
International Code Council
California Building Officials
County Building Officials Association of California
ICC Chapters of Central Coast, Foothill, Napa-Solano,
Peninsula, East Bay, Monterey, Sacramento Valley,
Yosemite, Shasta Cascade, Redwood Empire, Los
Angeles Basin, Orange Empire, Coachella
Certified Access Specialist Institute (CASI)
California Fire Chiefs Association
Northern California Fire Prevention Officers
Southern California Fire Prevention Officers
National Fire Protection Association
California Automatic Fire Alarm Association
American Fire Sprinkler Association
National Fire Sprinkler Association
American Public Works Association
American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE)
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Structural Engineers Association of Southern California Quality Assurance
Key to our approach to quality assurance is that it must occur throughout the entirety of the project and with the right people involved every step of the way. Our team’s unwavering integrity and commitment are combined with our internal processes and leading-edge digital technology to consistently produce quality work products and maintain highly satisfied clients. At project outset, CSG’s project manager assigns the most technically specialized team members who, through their experience and training, best understand the needs of our client. Our quality control processes include verifying procedures and code requirements, defining and applying standards used in code applications, and assessing work products to ensure that jurisdictional requirements and expectations are met.

Page 333 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
13 Project Examples
The following is a small sampling of projects for which CSG’s staff have provided services for:

CALIFORNIA FLATS SOLAR FARM | COUNTY OF MONTEREY, CA
Building Plan Review
CSG has performed building plan review for a variety of largescale solar power plants including this massive solar farm on a 2,900-acre site in Monterey County. The project included plan review for 280-megawatt power station with over 1 million solar panels capable of serving the energy needs of approximately 100,000 homes.

THE VILLAGES| CITY OF LOS BANOS, CA
Building Plan Review & Inspection
CSG provided building plan review and inspection on this residential development in Los Banos, CA. This project
included review of 4 master plans ranging from 1,515 to 2,814 square feet, as well as inspection of all units in the development.

HAMPTON INN | CITY OF PATTERSON, CA
Building Plan Review & Inspection
CSG performed building plan review and inspection for this new 48,471 square foot, 4-story hotel with a valuation of $7,500,000. The project is Type V-A construction, fully sprinklered and includes 86 guestrooms, business occupancies, a lobby, breakfast area, meeting room, fitness room, and an outdoor pool and spa.

GREENFIELD COMMONS | CITY OF GREENFIELD, CA
Building Plan Review
CSG is providing building plan review services for the Greenfield Commons residential project, which is comprised of eight residential buildings, two laundry buildings, a maintenance building and a community building. The project includes a total of 222 apartments in two-story modular structures, 333 parking spaces, 227 bicycle spaces, and is a 100% affordable development. The community building features amenities for residents such as fitness areas, laundry rooms, a kitchen, conference space, a general lobby and leasing offices—while Courtyard spaces serve as an integral component of the development.

SAN LUIS RANCH | CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
Building Plan Review
CSG is providing building plan review for this 130-acre property along US Highway 101. The project will include 580 residential units, 200,000 square feet of commercial space, 140,000 square feet of office development, and a 200-room hotel.

SECTION 5

Page 334 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
14 Fee Schedule

BUILDING SERVICES RATES
CSG’s fee schedule for proposed work is provided below. If plans are not submitted electronically, CSG will coordinate the pickup and return of all plans to CSG via CSG staff or a licensed courier service. This service is provided at no additional cost. Plan review is based on a percentage of the agency’s plan check fees and includes the initial plan review and two subsequent reviews. Additional reviews, deferred submittals, revisions, and RFIs will be charged at the appropriate hourly rate below. RFIs for large developments will be performed at an hourly rate, and turnaround times will be agreed upon in advance with the agency.

SERVICE / ROLE ALL INCLUSIVE FEE / HOURLY RATE
Off-Site Building Plan Review (by Percentage)
Full Building Plan Review by Percentage 70% of Agency’s Building Plan Check Fees Structural Only Plan Review by Percentage 45% of Agency’s Building Plan Check Fees Expedited Plan Review by Percentage 95% of Agency’s Building Plan Check Fees Off-Site Building Plan Review (Hourly Rates)
Building Plan Review $142
Building Plan Review – Professional Engineer $158
Building Plan Review – Structural Engineer $179
Structural Only Plan Review $179
Grading Plan Review – Civil Engineer $210
Expedited Plan Review (Hourly) 1.5 x Hourly Rate
CASp Services
CASp Plan Review/Consultation $175
CASp Inspection $175
Building Department Services
Permit Technician (Remote) $95
Senior Permit Technician (Remote) $110
Certified Building Inspector $122
Certified Combination Building Inspector $142
Building Department Administrative Services $153
All hourly rates include salaries, benefits, workers compensation insurance, local travel, and miscellaneous office expenses. Should the scope of work change, or circumstances develop which necessitate special handling, CSG will notify the Agency prior to proceeding. Overtime services and services provided outside of normal business hours will be billed at 1.5x the applicable hourly rate. Depending on project size and scope, CSG’s percentage-based expedited plan review rate may be adjusted if mutually agreed upon between the Agency and CSG. Hourly rates for publicly funded projects will be based on current prevailing wage rates. On July 1 of each year following the contract start year, CSG will initiate an hourly rate increase based on change in CPI for the applicable region. CSG will mail an invoice every month for services rendered during the previous month. Unless otherwise agreed, payment terms are 30-days from receipt of invoice.

Building Department Administrative Services may include developing and establishing: building department workflows and relationships with other agency departments, building permit code requirements, inspector and permit technician responsibilities, criteria for over-the-counter plan review and out-to-plan check projects, transmittals and routing processes, Building Department handouts for different project types; and may include other duties as assigned by the Agency.
6 S E C T I O N

Page 335 of 547 ends

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS TO THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FOR BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES
15 Appendix –Resumes of Key Staff SECTION 7

Page 336 of 547 ends

Ali

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
California Professional Engineer #45454
Certified Building Official (CBO)
Certified Fire Marshal (CFM)
Certified Building Code Specialist
Certified Building Inspector
Certified Building Plans Examiner
Certified Access Specialist (CASp)

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science Degree,
Civil Engineering | California State
University, Los Angeles
Associate in Arts Degree
Palomar College, San Diego

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Certified Access Specialist Institute
Principal Director of County Building
Officials Association of California‒Past
President.

Currently serving on the Executive Board
of Directorsfor the American Public
Works Association (APWA)
Annan PE, CBO, CFM, CASp
Regional Plan Check Director
Mr. Annan‘s professional background consists of over 41 years of diversified experience in Building Department Services, Engineering, Code Compliance, and Enforcement of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24. He served the County of Kern for 38 years, most recently as Chief Building Official and Assistant Director of Public Works. With CSG, Mr. Annan is a Regional Director of Plan Review Services and a Building Official, serving local jurisdictions.

He possesses a strong commitment to excellence in customer service and delivering professional, consistent, and timely plan reviews.

CSG EXPERIENCE
Regional Plan Check Director/Principal Plan Check Engineer Mr. Annan served as the Principal Plan Check Engineer and is now serving as a Regional Director of Plan Review Services for CSG. In this role, he serves as a Project Manager and a Building Official for several jurisdictions, overseeing the plan check operations of CSG’s Central Valley office.

PRIOR WORK EXPERIENCE
County of Kern, CA
Mr. Annan held positions of increasing responsibility during his tenure with the County of Kern.

Chief Building Official and Assistant Director: Mr. Annan served as Assistant Public Works Director and the Building Official for the County of Kern. This included overseeing and managing the operations of the Building and Code Division, which consists of the following Sections: Building Inspection, Counter Operations and Plan Check, Code Enforcement, Floodplain Management, Drainage, Grading, and County Service Areas. He attended Board of Supervisors hearings and other public meetings, conferred with Public Works Directors, members of the Board of Supervisors, and others on matters including code interpretations.

Engineering Manager-for Public Works Department/Engineering, Building Inspection, Surveying and Permit Services: Mr. Annan served as an Engineering Manager in charge of day-to-day operations related to building inspection and building plan check, building permit counter operations, drainage and grading plan reviews, and subdivision/land development plan reviews.

Supervising Engineer for the Engineering and Building Inspection Division: Mr. Annan served as a Supervising Engineer and lead building plans examiner for residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. In this role, he also performed comprehensive plan reviews for residential, commercial, and industrial projects, and interacted with consultants, engineers, architects, inspectors, contractors, and the public regarding matters related to code compliance. Additionally, he supervised building plans examiners, Inspectors, counter operations, and building plan technicians while providing training and building code interpretations for building inspectors and staff.

Engineer III-for Engineering and Survey Services Department: Mr. Annan served as the County Service Areas Engineer, managing the work of engineering consultants for various engineering and environmental projects. He designed flood control facilities,supervised construction inspection of major projects, and formed numerous county service areas and assessment districts, while also performing plan review for subdivision improvement plans.

Engineer II for the Planning and Development Services Department, Flood Plain Management Division: Mr. Annan performed land development improvement plan checks and analysis. He performed drainage, flood, and hydrology studies for land development while participating in the development and updating of hydrology and flood control standards.

Engineer II for the Public Works Department: Mr. Annan prepared construction contracts and specifications and interacted with local and state agencies concerning environmental matters. He also performed subdivision plan reviews to ensure compliance with Land Development Standards.

Zond Systems, Inc., CA
Design Engineer: Mr. Annan prepared foundation, grading and drainage plans for wind turbines development throughout California. He performed construction inspection to ensure work was completed in accordance with approved plans/specifications.

Page 337 of 547 ends

Mike

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
DSA Certified Access Specialist
(CASp) 071
Master Code Professional
Certified Building Official
Building Plans Examiner
Residential Plans Examiner
Building Inspector, UBC
Plans Examiner, UBC
Plumbing Inspector, UPC
Mechanical Inspector UMC
Residential Electrical Inspector
Commercial Electrical Inspector
Combination Inspector Uniform Codes
Residential Energy Inspector
Plans Examination
Commercial Energy Plans Examination
Commercial Energy Inspector
Accessibility Inspector/ Plans Examiner
Building Inspector
Combination Inspector
Residential Combination Inspector
Fire Inspector 1
ICC 5230795
Safety Assessment Program
SAPC61387
FEMA IS-00700 National Incident
Management Systems
IACET First Responder Awareness
(Association of Bay Area Governments)
CA State Contractors License
C-61D-28 688121
Structural Welder Certification Class
E7018

EDUCATION
Associate of Arts, General Education
Chabot College, Hayward, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member, CALBO Board of Directors
Past President, ICC Yosemite Chapter
Education Chairman, ICC Yosemite
Chapter
Member, IAEI Yosemite Division
Treasurer, ICC Region 1
Founding Member, Certified Access
Specialist Institute (CASI)
Brinkman CASp , CBO, MCP
Vice President of Building Services
Mr. Brinkman is a highly credentialed professional, holding numerous International Code Council (ICC) certifications across multiple disciplines. As a Master Code Professional, he has attained the highest level of ICC certification. In addition, he is a DSA-Certified Access Specialist, a Certified Building Official, and is accomplished in enforcing a full range of state codes as well as specifications and standards.

His experience as a CASp professional involves many years of ensuring compliance with accessibility requirements of the California Building Code Title 24 and Americans with Disabilities Act. Mr. Brinkman excels at providing guidance to public agencies, homeowners, architects, developers and contractors in the development of plans, and reviews and comments on sitespecific issues related to accessibility.

Mr. Brinkman has extensive knowledge of complex residential and commercial building systems and all stages of construction. As a project manager, he expertly advises stakeholders on design, coordination and construction, working with jurisdictional staff, engineers, architects, and homeowners to efficiently move projects through required permitting processes and procedures. Those abilities combined with his comprehensive knowledge of building code enforcement ensures code-compliant construction and facilitates successful project delivery.

Mr. Brinkman is also responsible for building operations for many municipal building departments—planning, directing, supervising and coordinating all department activities while maintaining customer service levels and positive public relations. He is active as a manager, trainer and instructor for personnel working in residential and commercial construction, plan reading and code interpretation.

RELEVANT CSG EXPERIENCE
Building Official/Building Inspector/Building Plan Check Engineer | Multiple Jurisdictions Mr. Brinkman currently provides contract building official, building inspection, and plan check services for CSG to the following jurisdictions:
 City of Patterson
 City of Gustine
 City of Hughson
 City of Firebaugh
 City of Los Banos
 City of Newman
 City of Escalon
 City of Mountain House

NOTABLE PROJECTS
 Hampton Inn (City of Patterson)
 Flying J Travel Center (City of Patterson)

PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Building Official/Building Inspector/Building Plan Check Engineer | Multiple Jurisdictions Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Brinkman provided contract building official, building inspection and plan check services for the following jurisdictions:
 City of Hollister
 City of Watsonville
 City of Pacific Grove
 County of San Benito

NOTABLE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
 Authored ICC published book: “Residential Building Inspection, A Step-by-Step Guide”  CALBO Director: 2019-Present
 CTI Course Development Award: 2016-2017 CALBO ABM
 Two-term past President and current Treasurer of the Yosemite Chapter of ICC  Founding Treasurer of ICC Region I
 County Building Officials Association of CA (CBOAC) – 2018 Building Official of the Year

Page 338 of 547 ends

Randy

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Mechanical Engineer
State of California | #M37959
Professional Mechanical Engineer
State of Nevada | #034323
ICC Certified Mechanical Plans
Examiner

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Mechanical and
Aeronautical Engineering, University of
California, Davis | Davis, CA
Brumley PE
Principal Plan Check Engineer
Mr. Brumley is a Senior Plan Check Engineer and will be providing mechanical, electrical, and plumbing plan review for CSG and its clients. He brings over 20 years of engineering experience. He is an innovative problem solver with extensive experience in complex industrial products, creative design, and development. To this role he brings expertise in design engineering and integration, and excellent interpersonal and communication skills.

C S G E X P E R I E N C E
Mr. Brumley has provided plan check reviews for the following agencies CSG serves:
 City of Sacramento
 City of Stockton
 City of South San Francisco
 City of Paso Robles
 County of Monterey

P R I O R E X P E R I E N C E
Mechanical Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm, Roseville, CA As a Mechanical Plans Examiner, Mr. Brumley performed building plan examinations to ensure commercial and residential building projects complied with Federal, State, and local rules, laws, and regulations. He provided technical expertise for mechanical, plumbing, energy, and green codes. Mr. Brumley also acted as an instructor for building officials, plans examiners, and inspectors for local chapters and established positive relationships with local agencies, City staff, and the public.

Mechanical Engineer | California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA Mr. Brumley reviewed, evaluated, and verified Acceptance Test Technician Certification Provider (ATTCP) applications. He conducted oversight of approved ATTCPs and their programs to ensure continued compliance with Title 24 for the installation and maintenance of mechanical systems for nonresidential buildings. He also worked within a team to develop program requirements, refined acceptance test procedures and updated building energy efficiency standards.

Senior Engineer | Aerojet Rocketdyne, Rancho Cordova, CA Mr. Brumley provided technical expertise for industrial product development. He managed project scope, schedule, and quality while concurrently controlling costs to meet budget requirements. He directed a multi-discipline team of engineers including mechanical, composite, electrical, manufacturing, systems, and testing.

Mr. Brumley also served as Lead Designer Engineer for warhead applications. He maintained design performance requirements and trained and mentored colleagues.

Project Engineer | Aerojet Rocketdyne, Rancho Cordova, CA Mr. Brumley handled product design and user interfaces, analyzed components, reviewed design merits, and reverse-engineered componentry. He reviewed manufacturing assembly processes and coordinated with Quality Assurance and Production teams to ensure production requirements and standards were met. He successfully integrated newly acquired company product lines and reduced manufacturing costs by developing and testing joint bearing strength panels.

Composite/Design Engineer | Aerojet Rocketdyne, Rancho Cordova, CA Mr. Brumley designed composite pressure vessels and containers for industrial and military use and worked with composite materials. He ensured on-time delivery of test hardware by providing versatile engineering support and reduced tool manufacturing costs. He also improved structural analysis efficiency and time savings by designing and developing graphic user interfaces in Excel.

Page 339 of 547 ends

Jimmy

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Mechanical PE

EDUCATION
MS. in Mechanical Engineering
California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona
BS in Mechanical Engineering
University of California, Irvine

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME)
Secretary
Le PE
Associate Plan Check Engineer
Mr. Le provides comprehensive mechanical and plumbing plan review and permit technician services on behalf of CSG and its clients. His role involves meticulously evaluating mechanical and plumbing system desSign to ensure they meet all codes and regulations. As a resultoriented and highly motivated professional, Mr. Le excels in managing complex projects, demonstrating exceptional skills in both independent and collaborative work environments.

He effectively communicates with team members and clients ensuring clarity and efficiency throughout the project plan check cycle. His self-motivation and commitment to excellence enable him to deliver high-quality outcomes within strict deadlines, contributing significantly to the successful completion of projects.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Plans Examiner | CSG Consultants, Inc.

Mr. Le performs mechanical and plumbing plan check across multiple jurisdictions to ensure compliance with California Mechanical and Plumbing Codes along with other codes and standards. His responsibilities include evaluating system layout. For mechanical systems, this includes evaluating HVAC layout, ductwork, equipment specifications, and energy efficiency.

For plumbing systems, it involves checking pipe routing, fixture placements, water sizing calculations, and drainage. Some notable projects include plan check for the city of Santa Ana commercial cannabis businesses evaluating HVAC systems for climate control and odor management and assessing complex plumbing needs such as high-capacity system and secure water supply configurations. Reviewing multi-unit condominiums for the city of Fullerton and its multi-unit HVAC systems for efficient heating, cooling and ventilation as well as adequate water supply, waste management and integration with other residential systems across multiple dwellings. This ensures proper integration with other building systems such as electrical and HVAC, and verifies that all designs meet safety, performance, and regulatory requirements.

As an intern, one of Mr. Le’s main responsibilities includes preparing plans and specifications to redesign an outdated Oil Dock facility at OCSD under supervision of Engineering Supervisor.

Tasks include researching articles on storage methods and designing exhaust/HVAC system using AutoCAD. Another responsibility includes conducting fieldwork with Associate Engineers to collect and input data of specialized equipment onto Maximo. Mr. Le is collaborative individual working with Assistant and Associate Engineers as well as operators and contractors to improve capital assets.

Mechanical Engineering Intern | Orange County Sanitation District As an intern, Mr. Lee would: collaborate with Assistant and Associate Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for minor engineering projects. Mr. Lee would also collect data, entry, tabulation and analysis for special projects and reports

Page 340 of 547 ends

Annette

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
ICC Plans Examiner
ICC # 8018477
Engineer-In-Training
State of California
EIT# 130173
Certified Access Specialist
CASp-538

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering
California State University
Fresno, CA
Mayfield EIT, CASp
Principal Plans Examiner
Ms. Mayfield is a CASp Certified Principal Plans Examiner for CSG with more than 15 years of experience serving multiple jurisdictions throughout California. She approaches plan review with unique knowledge while balancing the delivery of timely and accurate reviews and remaining responsive to and approachable by the public.

CSG EXPERIENCE
Principal Plans Examiner | CSG Consultants
As a CSG principal plans examiner, Ms. Mayfield’s experience includes reviews for residential, multifamily, and commercial projects, including specialty reviews of OSHPD 3 licensed clinics, educational facilities, industrial facilities, hotel/motels and residential care facilities. Some noteworthy projects include the Chammakilawish Tribal School, a multi-specialty care center facility for Sutter Health, and a semiconductor fabrication research and development facility.

Ms. Mayfield has performed plan check services for various CSG clients, including, but not limited to the following:
 City of Sunnyvale
 City of Mountain House
 City of Gilroy
 City of Newman
 City of Hughson
 City of Delano
 City of Sanger
 City of Sacramento
 City of Elk Grove
 Pechanga Band of Indians
 City of Stockton
 City of Monterey
 City of Watsonville
 City of Paso Robles
 City of Arroyo Grande
 City of San Luis Obispo
 California State University, Monterey Bay

PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Plans Examiner | Interwest Consulting Group
As a consulting plans examiner, Ms. Mayfield’s work included life safety reviews for high profile projects like the Sacramento Criminal Courthouse, Sacramento Republic Soccer Stadium, as well as the $1.3 billion-dollar 2020 UC Merced Campus Expansion.

Plans Examiner | NAFFA International
Ms. Mayfield performed life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, accessibility and structural reviews for residential, multifamily, and commercial projects, including specialty reviews of OSHPD 3 licensed clinics, high-rise buildings, industrial facilities, hotel/motels and residential care facilities. As a result of successfully serving numerous jurisdictions throughout California, Ms. Mayfield developed valuable expertise in working directly with applicants, designers, and agency staff.

Page 341 of 547 ends

Priska

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | 63188
Certified Building Plans Examiner
| ICC #9725699
CASp Certification #1153

EDUCATION
Master of Science in Civil Engineering
| Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona, CA
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering |
Trisakti University, Jakarta, Indonesia
Cheng PE, CASp
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Ms. Cheng is a Professional Civil Engineer and Certified Plans Examiner with more than 10 years of public agency and consulting experience performing building plan reviews. To her Senior Plan Check Engineer role, she brings a breadth and depth of experience in reviewing architectural and structural construction documents for compliance with building codes, complemented by her additional background as a design engineer.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Senior Plan Check Engineer | CSG Consultants, Orange, CA As a Senior Plan Check Engineer, Ms. Cheng is responsible for reviewing construction plans for CSG’s client agencies.

Plan Check Engineer | RKA Consulting Group, Inc., Walnut, CA As a Plan Check Engineer, Ms. Cheng was responsible for reviewing and checking construction plans and documents for complex commercial and residential buildings to ensure compliance with applicable building codes and local municipal codes, performing plan check functions for client cities, and communicating clearly and effectively with developers, architects, and other jurisdictions to achieve compliance with the codes. She also assisted client Building Officials with training staff on code interpretation and permit applications.

Structural Engineer Associate (Plan Check Engineer) | City of Los Angeles, CA - Building and Safety Department
In her 5-year tenure with the City of Los Angeles, Ms. Cheng reviewed architectural and structural construction documents for compliance with the City’s Building and Zoning Codes for permit issuance.

Structural Engineer Associate | Bock Engineering, Inc., Montclair, CA In this role, Ms. Cheng designed, calculated, analyzed, prepared, and checked structural drawings.

Structural Engineer Associate | Haerte Widya Consultant, Indonesia Ms. Cheng designed, calculated, analyzed, prepared, and checked structural drawings.

Page 342 of 547 ends

Stuart

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Plan Examiner
Certified Commercial Building
Inspector
|ICC 5087331
Certified Access Specialist | CASp - 872

EDUCATION
Extensive Code, Structural, and
Accessibility training through ICC,
CALBO, IAEI, NFPA, PSMJ, Access
Services Plus, and Cal CASp, Inc.

AFFILIATIONS
International Code Council (ICC)
Member of National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA)
International Association of Electrical
Inspectors (IAEI)
PSMJ Resources, Inc. – Project
Management
England CASp
Principal Plans Examiner
Mr. England serves as a Principal Plans Examiner in the Plan Review Division of CSG Consultants. He brings over 24 years of experience, having served in various roles in Building and Engineering Departments. With considerable experience as a designer, plan reviewer, and inspector, he has a broad and deep knowledge of construction and is well-suited to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of construction methods and technologies. To this role, he brings great project management and customer service skills, and the ability to take on various tasks and responsibilities.

R E L E V A N T C S G E X P E R I E N C E
CSG Principal Plans Examiner | Multiple CSG Client Agencies Mr. England has performed residential, multi-family, commercial, medical, industrial, structural, and agricultural plan review for a wide variety of CSG client agencies throughout California including:
 City of Beverly Hills
 City of Elk Grove
 City of Lincoln
 City of Los Banos
 City of Merced
 City of Mountain View
 City of Alameda
 City of Fresno
 City of Hayward
 City of Santa Cruz
 City of Stockton
 City of Monterey
 County of Ventura
 County of Fresno
 County of San Joaquin
 County of Santa Cruz
 County of Tuolumne
 County of Mariposa
 County of Merced
 County of Monterey
 County of San Diego
 County of San Luis Obispo
 County of San Mateo
 Pechanga Band of Indians

P R I O R E X P E R I E N C E
Project Manager | Consulting Firm, Merced, CA
Mr. England served as a project manager for commercial, multi-family, industrial, and agricultural projects. He performed quality control during the plan and construction phases.

He coordinated and communicated with consultants, utility companies, contractors, and clients. Additional responsibilities included plan check and site inspections for commercial, multi-family, industrial, and agricultural projects.

Plans Examiner | City of Merced, CA
Mr. England performed plan review and inspection for complex commercial, industrial, OSHPD3, multi-family, and accessibility projects.

Engineering Technician IV | City of Merced, CA
Mr. England performed plan review and inspection for all utility encroachments, general encroachments, and treatment plants. He also provided multi-jurisdictional inspections and inspection services for capital improvement projects.

Page 343 of 547 ends

Ashkan

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
CA Professional Civil Engineer | #88855
Approved for SE by CA Board for
Professional Engineers
Licensed Engineer in Tehran, Iran

EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering
Iran University of Science and
Technology, Tehran, Iran
Arya PE
Senior Plan Check Engineer
To CSG and its public agency clients, Mr. Arya brings expertise gained from more than 20 years of industry experience, which includes more than 7 years of experience performing plan review for commercial, residential and industrial projects. He has worked as both a Structural Plan Check Engineer and Structural Design Engineer and is well versed in both preparing structural plans and performing plan review for structures and projects.

CSG EXPERIENCE
Senior Plan Check Engineer | Multiple CSG Client Agencies Mr. Arya has performed plan review services for a wide range of CSG clients including the following:
 City of Richmond
 City of Livingston
 City of Gilroy
 City of Elk Grove
 City of Los Banos
 City of Los Altos Hills
 City of Delano
 City of Patterson
 City of Mountain House
 City of San Luis Obispo
 City of San Carlos
 City of Oxnard
 City of Paso Robles
 City of Mountain View
 County of San Diego
 County of Tuolumne
 County of Mariposa
 County of Ventura

RELEVANT PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Structural Plan Check Engineer | Bureau Veritas, North America Mr. Arya, provided contract structural plan review services for public agencies including assisting the City of Santa Rosa with post-fire disaster rebuild efforts. His work included performing structural plan review for a variety of structures and project types including but not limited to single family and multifamily dwellings, commercial, parking, healthcare facilities, warehouses, and cell towers, seismic retrofits. and solar projects. His plan checks involved project materials and systems including wood, masonry, steel, concrete, cold form steel and building systems including moment frame, various bracing systems, and shear wall systems up to 10-stories.

Structural Design Engineer | Self Employed
Mr. Arya prepared structural plans and calculations for a variety of residential and commercial projects.

Structural Design Engineer | BHW Engineers
Mr. Arya prepared structural plans and calculations for new construction, including additions, remodels, seismic retrofits and retaining structures.

Structural Design Engineer | Tehran, Iran
In this role, Mr. Arya prepared structural plans and calculations for a variety of building structures: primarily concrete and steel residential projects, parking, and commercial (up to 13- story). These projects featured a variety of building structural systems, including concrete and steel moment frames, concrete shear walls, steel bracing frames and numerous foundation types.

Page 344 of 547 ends

Rafael

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Civil Engineer
State of California | 34503
California Access Specialist
DSA Certified | 279
Certified Building Official
Building Plans Examiner
| ICC 8029259
Registered General Building Contractor,
State of California

EDUCATION
Associate in Arts, Civil Engineering, Los
Angeles City College | Los Angeles, CA
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering,
California State University Los Angeles
|Los Angeles, CA

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Treasurer, Central Coast Chapter of ICC
(Former Vice President)
Cornejo PE, CASP, CBO
Senior Plan Check Engineer
As a Senior Plan Check Engineer, Mr. Cornejo brings over 45 years of plan checking experience and expertise, ranging from residential and commercial review to accessibility compliance review. Having worked as both a consultant and city employee with several jurisdictions in Central and Southern California, he has the professional skills to maintain excellent working relationships with applicants as well as agency staff. Mr. Cornejo is well versed in building plan review and is capable of conducting plan review for a variety of project types including complex commercial high-rises and multi-story mixed-use developments.

RELEVANT JURISDICTIONAL EXPERIENCE
CSG Building Official | City of Lompoc, CA
Mr. Cornejo managed the counter operations, conducted plan review and inspection services, and coordinated with City Staff, architects, applicants and developers for design review meetings as needed.

CSG Plan Check Engineer | County of Orange, CA
Mr. Cornejo conducted plan review for various types of projects ranging from large commercial to large residential plans. Mr. Cornejo coordinated with applicants at the counter, attended project meetings, and communicated with County staff regarding workflow and County goals.

Building & Safety Supervisor | City of San Luis Obispo, CA Mr. Cornejo provided plan review services and supervised a staff of building inspectors, permit technicians, permit coordinators, plans examiners, code enforcement officers, neighborhood services specialists, and inspector interns.

Plan Check Engineer | City of San Gabriel, CA
Mr. Cornejo reviewed residential and commercial plans and calculations for compliance with Fire Life Safety and structural requirements, California Building Code, California Plumbing and Mechanical Codes, the National Electric Code, and Title 24.

NOTABLE PROJECT EXPERIENCE
St. Michael’s Abbey | County of Orange, CA
Mr. Cornejo was a Plan Check Engineer for the project involving a structure that was designed for a monastery and nuns at the convent. The development included clergy guest rooms, a church and related administrative offices, and a burial chapel structure.

County of Orange Housing Authority | County of Orange, CA Mr. Cornejo was a Plan Check Engineer for a two-story residential building with leasing offices and a community room. This project was constructed using a controversial “steel container” type of construction.

Ash Street and Sanjon Road Project | City of Ventura, CA Mr. Cornejo was the Plan Check Engineer for a mixed-use development that consisted of residential units and spaces for commercial retail and offices. The project consisted of 11 mixed-use buildings across 3 different sites and the buildings ranged from two to four stories.

Large Coastal Residential Projects | County of Ventura, CA Mr. Cornejo was the Plan Check Engineer for various large residential projects involving homes ranging in 25 to 40 thousand square feet in area.

Page 345 of 547 ends

JuanCarlos

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Engineer-in-Training (EIT)
Residential Plans Examiner
Building Plans Examiner
Residential Building Inspector
Residential Plumbing Inspector
Residential Mechanical Inspector
Residential Electrical Inspector
Residential Combination Inspector
ICC 10533959

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
California State University, Long Beach

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Senior Design Captain‒
Multi-use 2 Story Building
ASCE- Design Lead‒
Timber-Strong Design Team
TAU Beta Pi‒Engineering Honors Society
Jimenez
Associate Plan Check Engineer I
Mr. Jimenez serves CSG and its public agency clients as an Associate Plan Check Engineer.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Associate Plan Check Engineer I | CSG Consultants, Orange, CA Mr. Jimenez performs residential plan check reviews for CSG client agencies. His work includes review of drawings, calculations, soils reports and other documents for conformance with the requirements of the California Building Codes and Reference Standards. He also uses his engineering training to assess designs with respect to lifesafety and other aspects of the code. In addition to his remote plan review work, Mr.

Jimenez, has provided staff augmentation to agencies in need of onsite support. He excels at interfacing and communicating effectively with both agency staff and external customers with varying levels of technical expertise.

Plan Review Engineer | True North Compliance Services, Long Beach, CA Mr. Jimenez conducted comprehensive reviews of more than 175 construction plans to ensure compliance with minimum safety standards, municipal codes, and applicable building codes. He evaluated the structural integrity and life-safety features of proposed buildings, identifying and addressing potential issues. He was responsible for the technical review of all construction documents related to residential and multi-family construction.

In addition, Mr. Jimenez, also served as a Plan Check Engineer for the City of Malibu providing over-the counter services and in-house plan checks.

Project Manager | Keen Building Contractors LLC, Long Beach, CA Mr. Jimenez supervised and coordinated the work of construction teams including all subcontractors and laborers to ensure that all tasks were performed to specification and achieved code compliance, resulting in more than ten successfully completed construction projects. His responsibilities included developing project plans, timelines, and schedules to ensure that projects were completed on time.

Entry Level Structural Engineer | TY Engineering and Design, Manhattan Beach, CA Mr. Jimenez designed structural engineering drawings and performed structural engineering calculations for new construction and renovations. He prepared engineering plans, details and structural engineering packages to pass city inspection and meet current building standards and codes.

General Tradesman | Keen Building Contractors, Long Beach, CA Mr. Jimenez diagnosed and resolved issues related to framing, grading, and electrical systems with other tradespeople to ensure projects were completed on time and within budget. He used AutoCAD and Revit to draw new or remodel residential blueprints for 19 customers and their agency submittals.

Page 346 of 547 ends

Johnathan

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Building Official,
Certified Fire Marshal
Certified Building Plans Examiner
Certified Fire Plans Examiner
Certified Accessibility
Certified Building Inspector
Certified Fire Inspector II
Certified Residential Combination
Inspector,
|ICC 856257

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Public Health,
Brigham Young University Idaho
| Rexburg, ID
Associate’s Degree, Inspection
Technology, Valley College
San Bernardino, CA

AFFILIATIONS
ICC Certified Building Official / Fire
Marshal Exam Development
Committee
Former President of CCFPA Central
Coast Fire Prevention Officers
Past President of ICC Central Coast
Chapter
Hurst
Senior Plans Examiner
Mr. Hurst serves as a Senior Plans Examiner in the Plan Review Division of CSG Consultants. He has over 35 years of experience, having served in various roles in Building Departments. To this role he brings expertise gained from his multi-agency experience, along with excellent customer service skills and the ability to take on various plan reviewrelated tasks and responsibilities.

R E L E V A N T E X P E R I E N C E
Building Official | City Arroyo Grande, CA
Mr. Hurst served as the City’s Building Official under the direction of the Fire Chief and the Community Development Director. In this role, he was responsible for supervising all construction projects within the City. Additionally, he performed Fire Plan Review and Inspection, and the duties of a Fire Marshal.

Senior Plans Examiner | City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mr. Hurst served as a Senior Plans Examiner for the City and was under the direction of the Building Official. He was responsible for the plan review and permit issuance of all residential and commercial construction projects within the City.

Plans Examiner | County of Corona, CA
As a plans examiner, Mr. Hurst issued permits, performed plans examination and conducted occasional field inspections. Additionally, he assisted with setting up the County’s automated permit tracking system.

Page 347 of 547 ends

Christine A.

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Residential Plans Examiner (ICC)
CALGreen Inspector/Plans Examiner (ICC)
Certified Permit Technician (ICC)

EDUCATION
Bachelor of arts, Communication
California State University, Fresno |
Fresno, CA
Uhalde
Associate Plans Examiner
Ms. Uhalde is an Associate Plans Examiner for CSG and its clients. With her background, she uses her ability to multi-task, attention to detail, and efficient work ethic skills to provide the highest quality service to our clients.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Associate Plans Examiner | CSG Consultants, Inc.

Ms. Uhalde has provided plan review services for multiple jurisdictions throughout California, including:
 Town of San Anselmo
 City of Mountain House
 City of Santa Cruz
 City of Arroyo Grande
 City of Paso Robles
 City of Los Banos
 City of Grover Beach
 City of Fowler
Permit Technician | CSG Consultants, Inc.

Ms. Uhalde provided permit technician services for multiple jurisdictions throughout California.

PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Fifth Grade Teaching Assistant | Lincoln Elementary School, Fresno, CA Created and adapted lesson plans according to students’ academic needs, including both individual and group work. Attended and actively participated in all meetings including PLCs, grade level meetings, and PD sessions. Helped facilitate a safe, supportive, and energetic community that welcomes the various needs and learning styles of children.

Household Manager | The Williams Family, Dallas, TX
Booked flights and domestic travel arrangements for the family to ensure all logistics were planned in advance. Coordinated schedules with cleaning services, yard services, tutors, contractors, and vendors. Maintained comprehensive household manuals, setting priorities for tasks on a daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.

Program Director | The First Tee of Northern Nevada, Reno, NV Executed marketing strategies resulting in 45% growth of program participant base and attained the highest number of participants since the chapter’s start. Built a network of new community partnerships with over 10 organizations including the Boys and Girls Club and Girl Scouts of America. Planned, coordinated, and executed varying types of internal and external meetings, annual fundraising events, volunteer trainings, and employee moral functions Developed annual budgets, project timelines, expense reports, and created a filing/recording system for donations and data entry .

Page 348 of 547 ends

Jared

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
California Residential Building Inspector
Residential Electrical Inspector
Residential Plans Examiner
Residential Energy Inspector/Plans
Examiner
| ICC 8488488

EDUCATION
Building Inspection
Butte Community College | Chico, CA
Building Inspection on the Job Training
CSG Academy | Newman, CA
Claypool
Associate Plans Examiner II
Mr. Claypool serves as Building Inspector for CSG Consultants. To his inspection work, he brings expertise and building knowledge gained from experience in the construction industry. He has a knowledge of the complete building process, which allows him to issue permits, provide customer service to applicants on the phone and in person.

Prior to joining CSG, Mr. Claypool was a professional glazier. He is experienced at retrieving a regular stream of daily assignments from a central dispatch and ensuring early or on-time job completion. Responsibilities included inspecting machinery and understanding proper tool and equipment use required for task completion.

Mr. Claypool has strong leadership and excellent customer service skills. He regularly attends trade school to continue his training. His current trade certifications include OSHA 30, Boom Lift, Scissor Lift, Fork Lift, Grade ALL, First Aid, CPR, Hoisting and Rigging.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Plan Review | Multiple Jurisdictions
Mr. Claypool performs plan review support for our plan check staff, reviewing over the counter solar plans, small additions and remodels for residential projects for numerous CSG client cities. A sampling of clients he provided services for include the City of Newman, City of Los Banos, City of Gustine and City of Patterson.

Building Inspector | Multiple Jurisdictions
Mr. Claypool has performed building inspections from the ground up for residential and light commercial projects throughout the CSG client cities. A sampling of clients he provided services for include the City of Newman, City of Patterson, City of Gustine, City of Los Banos and Stanislaus County.

Permit Technician | Multiple Jurisdictions
Mr. Claypool has performed building inspections from the ground up for residential and light commercial projects throughout the CSG client cities. These clients include the City of Newman, City of Los Banos, and City of Gustine.

CSG Academy Training | CSG Consultants—Central Valley, CA As a trainee, Mr. Claypool has learned the sequence and procedure of building inspections, becoming familiar with the codes concentrating on Chapter 3 of the CBC. He has shadowed and mentored CSG inspectors to develop field techniques, becoming familiar with the layout of plans and documents including “approved” job site plans, and has a solid understanding of how building departments function. Additionally, he understands different city/ county ordinances and how they work with the codes. He is also able to issue permits through CSG’s GreenVue permitting system.

Page 349 of 547 ends

CITY OF SHAFTER

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of , 2026 by and between the City of Shafter, a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 336 Pacific Avenue, Shafter, California 93263 (“City”), and Cor n er s t on e Mu n ic ip a l Se rv ic e s , a California Corporation with its principal place of business at Alta Loma, Ca (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement.

B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services.

C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Services.

Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the March 23, 2026; Legal Services Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

3. Additional Work.

Page 350 of 547 ends

or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement.

4. Maintenance of Records.

5. Term of Agreement:

8. Standard of Care.

Page 351 of 547 ends

9. Assignment and Subconsultant.

10. Independent Contractor.

11. Insurance.

Page 352 of 547 ends

13. Verification of Employment Eligibility.

14. Laws and Venue.

This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of Kern, State of California.

15. Termination or Abandonment.

The City and Consultant have the right to terminate work under this Agreement as set

Page 353 of 547 ends

forth in the agreement under “Term of Agreement”.

16. Organization.

Consultant shall assign Harley Jenkins as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City.

17. Limitation of Agreement.

This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work include in the Project described above.

18. Notice.

CITY: CONSULTANT
City of Shafter Christine Champany
336 Pacific Avenue Cornerstone Municipal Services
Shafter, California 93263 8780 19th Street # 256
Attn: City Manager Alta Loma, CA 91701
and shall be effective upon receipt thereof.

19. Third Party Rights.

Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant.

20. Equal Opportunity Employment.

21. Entire Agreement.

This Agreement, with its exhibits, represents the entire understanding of City and

Page 354 of 547 ends

22. Severability.

The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the provisions unenforceable, invalid, or illegal.

23. Successors and Assigns.

24. Non-Waiver.

None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either party unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing.

25. Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

26. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants.

City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects.

27. Prohibited Interests.

Page 355 of 547 ends

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SHAFTER

AND CORNERSTONE MUNICIPAL SERVICES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SHAFTER CORNERSTONE MUNICIPAL SERVICES
By: By: __________________________________
Lance Lippincott
City Manager Its: Chief Executive Officer
Printed Name: Christine Champany
ATTEST:

By: ________________________
City Clerk

Page 356 of 547 ends

Cornerstone

M U N I C I P A L S E R V I C E S

EXHIBIT - A

Page 357 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 1
March 23, 2026
Mr. Dennis Fidler
Building Official
City of Shafter
336 Pacific Avenue
Shafter, CA 93263
Dear Mr. Fidler,
On behalf of Cornerstone Municipal Services (Cornerstone), we would like to express our interest in providing Building & Safety Support Services to the City of Shafter (City). Our leadership team brings over 45 years of combined experience in providing building and safety support services, including plan review, inspection, permit processing, and code enforcement support.

We understand the challenges jurisdictions face in maintaining consistent service levels during periods of high project volume or staffing transitions. Our certified professionals, including licensed engineers, CASp inspectors, plans examiners, and permit technician, are well-versed in state and federal regulations, the California Building Standards Code, and local municipal procedures. We pride ourselves on delivering efficient, accurate, and customer-focused services that align with City policies and uphold public safety standards.

Our goal is to act as an extension of the department, offering flexible and responsive support customized to the City’s operational needs. Whether through on-call inspection services, supplemental plan review, or full contract staffing, we are prepared to provide seamless integration with your existing processes while maintaining the highest level of professionalism and service.

We look forward to meeting with you and your team to discuss how we can assist the City in continuing to provide efficient, code-compliant, and customer-oriented Building & Safety Support Services. Please feel free to contact me at (909)238-7283 or [email protected] to schedule a convenient time to discuss our services.

Sincerely,
Harley Jenkins
Customer Development
Cornerstone Municipal Services
8780 19th Street #256
Alta Loma, CA 91701
(909)238-7283
[email protected]
Christine Champany
Chief Executive Officer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
8780 19th Street #256
Alta Loma, CA 91701
(909)843-0552
[email protected]

Page 358 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 2
WHO WE ARE .....................................................................................................................3 OUR TEAM ...........................................................................................................................4 Organizational Chart............................................................................................................4 Project Manager ..................................................................................................................4 Team Member Summary ......................................................................................................4 SERVICES ........................................................................................................................... 19 Plan Review....................................................................................................................... 19 Methodology.................................................................................................................. 20 Correction Lists.............................................................................................................. 20 Permit Issuance................................................................................................................. 21 Building Inspection ............................................................................................................ 22 Code Enforcement............................................................................................................. 22 CUSTOMER SERVICE ........................................................................................................ 27 FEE SCHEDULE ................................................................................................................. 28 Table of Contents

Page 359 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 3
As a trusted Building and Safety Consultant, Cornerstone is founded on the collective expertise of a leadership team that brings together more than 40 years of combined experience in serving cities and counties throughout California. This extensive background enables us to deliver services that are not only comprehensive but tailored to the unique needs and environments of each client. Cornerstone's reputation is built on consistency, professionalism, and a proactive approach to supporting jurisdictions with plan review, inspection, permit issuance, and code enforcement services. By leveraging this valuable experience, we offer unmatched quality and reliability in the building and safety sector.

Our team brings extensive expertise in interpreting and applying state and local building codes and zoning ordinances, enabling us to deliver solutions that are both practical and fully compliant with all regulations. At Cornerstone, we serve as a trusted resource for municipalities, providing expert support services that strengthen their capacity to enforce building regulations effectively. We also offer essential guidance to stakeholders across the construction and development industry—including architects, engineers, contractors, and property owners, helping ensure projects meet rigorous requirements for seismic resilience, fire protection, and environmental safety. Through this comprehensive approach, we streamline project timelines, reduce risk, and support the creation of safe, sustainable, and code-compliant structures.

What sets Corner stone apart is its
modern yet traditional approach to service
delivery.

Drawing on decades of hands-on experience, our team integrates technology, communication, and collaboration tools to streamline building safety operations. We partner closely with City staff, architects, engineers, and contractors to provide clear, consistent, and professional guidance. While the company may be new in name, its team’s depth of experience and commitment to excellence ensure trust, high-quality support for municipalities and the development community alike. WHO WE ARE
To deliver dependable, highquality building and safety services through customerfocused solutions that help
communities build safely,
efficiently, and with confidence.

Our strategy is driven by our
clients’ needs. We prioritize
responsiveness, transparency,
and practical solutions to ensure
services are delivered with a
strong emphasis on customer
service.

Our goal is to support jurisdictions
with professional, ethical, and
reliable services that protect
public health, safety, and welfare
while enhancing the overall
customer experience.

Our values reflect a commitment
to integrity, quality, collaboration,
and service excellence, ensuring
that everything we do supports our
clients’ goals and the public good.

MISSION STRATEGY GOAL VALUES

Page 360 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 4
Cornerstone’s seasoned and technically proficient staff brings a wealth of knowledge and hands-on experience to every project. Encompassed of highly skilled engineers, certified plans examiners, and code specialists, our team possesses an intense understanding of building codes, construction standards, and regulatory requirements. With decades of combined experience in both public and private sectors, they are adept at navigating complex technical challenges, performing thorough plan reviews, and providing practical solutions that ensure code compliance and public safety. Their commitment to precision, efficiency, and professionalism allows them to support clients with reliable guidance throughout the permitting and construction process.

Organizational Chart
This organizational chart offers a clear and approachable snapshot of how Cornerstone works together as a team. It shows not just lines of authority, but how communication and responsibility flow throughout our organization. By clearly outlining who does what and how each role connects, the chart helps ensure smooth coordination between plan review, permitting, inspections, and enforcement. This clarity fosters collaboration, accountability, and responsive service. Ultimately, it reflects our commitment to transparency, strong regulatory oversight, and delivering dependable, customer-focused building and safety services.

Project Manager
Cornerstone proposes Colin Leung and Christine Champany to serve as the primary points of coordination between the jurisdiction, staff, and stakeholders, ensuring services are delivered efficiently, consistently, and in full compliance with contractual requirements. This role oversees day-to-day operations, staffing, schedules, and performance metrics while maintaining clear communication with jurisdictional leadership. We will monitor workload and turnaround times, implement quality control procedures, and promptly address issues or changing needs. By managing resources, tracking progress, and facilitating collaboration among plan review, inspection, and administrative teams, we will ensure seamless service delivery, accountability, and a high level of customer service throughout the duration of the contract.

Team Member Summary
The table below offers a clear overview of Cornerstone’s dedicated team. It details each team member’s role, experience, and certifications, making it easy to see who will be supporting the City’s needs. It reflects collaborative team committed to responsiveness, accountability, and delivering high-quality service. OUR TEAM City of
Shafter
Cornerstone
Municipal Services
Plan Review
Inspection
Permit Issuance
Code Enforcement

Page 361 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 5
Team Member Education | Certifications | Licenses Professional Experience Chris Agus, CASp
Plan Review
Bachelor of Science Architecture
State of California Access Specialist
State of California CAL-EMA
International Code Council Plans Examiner
30+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
City of Glendale Code Specialist
KKE Architects Project Manager
Osborn Architects Junior Architect
Calvin Chang, PE
Plan Review
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering
State of California Professional Engineer
International Code Council Plans Examiner
35+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
City of Burbank Plan Review Manager
Oliver Liu & Associates Structural Engineer
Ramy Eshak, PE
Plan Review
Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering
State of California Professional Engineer
15+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
County of Los Angeles Principal Engineering Asst.

County of Los Angeles Engineering Testins Aide III
Applied Companies Mechanical Engineer
Samir Ghosn, PE
Plan Review
Master of Science Civil Engineering
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering
State of California Professional Engineer
International Code Council Plans Examiner
International Code Fire Sprinkler Examiner
30+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
City of Newport Beach Building Official
JA Martin & Associates Project Manager
ARUP Structural Engineer
KPFF Engineers Project Manager
Colin Leung, SE, PE
Plan Review
Master of Science Structural Engineering
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering
State of California Professional Engineer
International Code Council Building Inspector
International Code Council Plans Examiner
30+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
City of Glendale Building Code Specialist III
JA Martin & Associates Project Manager
ARUP Structural Engineer
KPFF Engineers Project Manager
Adam Marcus, PE
Plan Review
Bachelor of Science Electrical Engineering
State of California Professional Engineer
International Code Council Plans Examiner
15+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
County of Los Angeles Electrical Engineer Asst. II
County of Los Angeles Electrical Engineer Asst. I
Fresenius Research Engineer

Page 362 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 6
Team Member Education | Certifications | Licenses Professional Experience Eric Reiter, PE
Plan Review
Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering
State of California Professional Engineer
25+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
County of Los Angeles Mechanical Engineer Asst. II
County of Los Angeles Civil Engineering Technician
Peter Tung, PE
Plan Review
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering
State of California Professional Engineer
International Code Council Plans Examiner
35+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
City of Santa Monica Principal Plan Check Engineer
Paul Christman, MCP
Plan Review
International Code Council Master Code Prof. 30+ Years Experience Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
County of Kauai Supervising Plans Examiner
City of Rancho Palos Verdes Building Official
City of Huntington Beach Sr. Electrical Inspector
City of Santa Monica Supervising Inspector
City of Redondo Beach Senior Building Inspector
Eric Corral
Plan Review
Master of Science Human Resources
Bachelor of Science Public Administration
International Code Council Plans Examiner
International Code Council Building Inspector
25+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
City of Fontana Plans Examiner II
Southern California Edison Planning Specialist
City of Fontana Maintenance Worker II
Anthony Corral Construction Project Manager
Adam Panos
Plan Review - Fire
Bachelor of Science Fire Protection
Associate of Science Fire Protection
International Code Council Plans Examiner
International Code Council Fire Inspector I
International Code Council Fire Inspector II
25+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
County of San Bernardino Deputy Fire Marshal
City of Ontario Fire Protection Analyst
County of San Bernardino Fire Prevention Supervisor
City of Chino Fire Inspector
Daniel Sifuentes
Plan Review - Fire
Associate of Science Fire Protection
International Code Council Plans Examiner
20+ Years Experience
Cornerstone Plan Check Engineer
City of Montebello Fire Marshal
City of Torrance Fire Prevention Specialist

Page 363 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 7
Professional Summary
With over 30 years of experience in the building safety and construction industry, Mr. Agus brings extensive expertise in building plan review services. He is an ICC Certified Building Plans Examiner, a Certified Access Specialist, and certified under the Cal EMA Safety Assessment Program.

Holding a Bachelor of Science in Architecture, Mr. Agus has served in roles such as Building Code Specialist III, Project Manager, and CAD Drafter. In these positions, he conducted complex plan reviews for challenging construction projects, ensuring compliance with all relevant building codes and municipal regulations.

Mr. Agus provides technical support on building and safety matters to the public, city staff, engineers, architects, contractors, builders, and property owners, and assists in interpreting and implementing new building regulations. During his tenure with the City of Glendale, he contributed to the preparation of building ordinances, presented staff reports at public hearings, and helped develop informational forms and handouts for public use. In addition to his regulatory work, he has managed multiple construction projects and produced detailed construction documents and drawings.

Work Experience
Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Building Code Specialist III
Building & Safety Division, City of Glendale, CA
Perform complex plan reviews for difficult construction projects by collaborating with other plan review staff to ensure compliance with applicable building codes and local municipal regulations.

Project Manager
KKE Architects
At various stages of construction, implement contract administration in collaboration with the Director of Architecture & Project Manager.

Provided leadership and direction to a small team of architects in the preparation of construction documents.

Job Captain | Project Manager
F+A Architects
Project Manager
RHA Inc.

Junior Architect
Osborn Architects
CAD Drafter
Gangi Builders, Inc
CHRIS AGUS, CASp
Plan Review
Education
California State Polytechnic, Pomona
Bachelor of Architecture
Licenses | Certifications
Division of the State Architect
Certified Access Specialist
International Code Council
Building Plans Examiner
California Office of Emergency Services
Safety Assessment Program
Affiliations
ICC – Los Angeles Basin Chapter
Disabled Access Committee

Page 364 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 8
Professional Summary
Mr. Leung is a licensed Civil and Structural Engineer in California with over two decades of experience in structural engineering, plan review, and code compliance. He holds both a bachelor’s and master’s degree in civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Southern California.

Colin is also an ICC Certified Building Plans Examiner and Inspector.

Currently serving as a Building Code Specialist III for the City of Glendale since 2014, he is responsible for interpreting building codes and ordinances, assessing structural stability, and ensuring compliance with various safety and accessibility standards. His work involves reviewing a wide range of structures, from residential buildings to commercial and solar panel installations, as well as drafting and revising building regulations.

Prior to his current role, Mr. Leung held positions at various engineering firms where he led structural design and analysis for diverse projects, including hospitals, schools, universities, and international developments. He has extensive experience in project management, budget oversight, peer reviews, seismic analysis, and coordination with architects and contractors throughout the construction process. Mr.

Leung is also proficient in a wide range of engineering and drafting software, and fluent in English, Cantonese, and Mandarin, which enhances his ability to communicate and collaborate effectively in diverse environments.

Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Building Code Specialist III
Building & Safety Division, City of Glendale, CA
Explain building codes and ordinance provisions to the general public, City staff, engineers, architects, contractors, builders or owners. Review architectural and structural plans, specifications and computations submitted in connection with applications for single and multiple dwellings, apartment houses, hotels, commercial, office and manufacturing buildings, signs, and any other type of structure, for compliance with the Glendale Building and Safety Code, for structural safety, fire safety, exits and other pertinent City ordinances. Assess building plans for compliance with the State of California Energy Code.

Project Manager
John A. Martin & Associates
Structural Engineer
ARUP
Project Manager
KPFF Consulting Engineers
Various Positions
B&B Associates, Melvyn Green & Associates, Anderson Design Group

COLIN LEUNG, PE, SE
Plan Review
Education
University of Southern California
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
Master of Science, Structural Engineering
Licenses | Certifications
State of California
Licensed Structural Engineer
Licensed Civil Engineer
International Code Council
Building Plans Examiner
Building Inspector
Affiliations
ICC – Los Angeles Basin Chapter

Page 365 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 9
Professional Summary
With nearly 30 years of experience in plan review and structural engineering, Mr. Chang has extensive expertise across all facets of the plan review process. He served as Plan Check Manager for the City of Burbank for more than 20 years, where he managed and directed the daily operations of the Building Division’s plan check and public counter functions and supervised the review and approval of complex architectural, structural, and geotechnical plans and technical documentation.

Earlier in his career, Mr. Chang worked as a Project Engineer with Oliver Liu & Associates, gaining hands-on experience in structural engineering design and preparing construction drawings and specifications for residential and commercial projects utilizing wood, steel, and masonry systems. Throughout his career, he has reviewed a wide range of residential, commercial, industrial, mobile home, and swimming pool projects to ensure full code compliance.

Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Plan Review Manager
Building & Safety Division, City of Burbank, CA
Responsible for reviewing building plans for compliance with applicable codes and regulations, including structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and hydraulic calculations. Provided technical guidance on code interpretations, conducting field investigations, preparing detailed reports, and utilizing a variety of computer software.

Assisted with the proposal and development of regulations while maintaining effective working relationships with supervisors, colleagues, and the public. Managed the daily operations of the Community Development Department’s building plan check and public counter functions, overseeing the review and approval of complex architectural, structural, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing plans and technical documentation, while performing related duties as needed.

Project Manager
Oliver Lui & Associates
Responsible for planning, coordination, and delivery of structural engineering projects from concept through construction. Oversaw project scope and schedule, while serving as the primary point of contact for clients, architects, consultants, and contractors. Ensured that structural calculations, drawings, and specifications comply with applicable building codes and industry standards, while maintaining quality control and risk management practices.

CALVIN CHANG, PE
Plan Review
Education
Tennessee Technological University
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
Licenses | Certifications
State of California
Licensed Civil Engineer
International Code Council
Building Plans Examiner
Affiliations
International Code Council
Los Angeles Basin Chapter

Page 366 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 10
Professional Summary
Mr. Tung has in excess of 30 years of experience performing plan review on behalf of various jurisdictions. He conducts comprehensive reviews of construction plans, engineering calculations, and related reports to ensure full compliance with building codes, local ordinances, and state regulations. His ability to provide clear, actionable feedback to permit applicants, meet with design teams to clarify comments and verify corrections, and approve revised plans allows for timely permit issuance.

Mr. Tung has been responsible for providing project management support throughout the permitting process, attending pre-submittal design review meetings to assess project feasibility, and coordinating with City departments, outside agencies, community groups, and the public.

Additionally, he has provided guidance to staff on submittal requirements, fee determination, and approval processes, while delivering accurate information to the public regarding Division policies and procedures.

Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Contract Plan Review Engineer
Building Division, City of Anaheim
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Building Department, City of Santa Monica
Provided comprehensive plan review services to ensure construction documents comply with applicable building codes, local ordinances, and state regulations. Evaluated drawings, calculations, and engineering reports and issued clear correction comments. Conducted applicant meetings and approved revised plans for permit issuance.

Participated in pre-submittal design review meetings to assess feasibility and support efficient permitting outcomes.

PETER TUNG, PE
Plan Review
Education
Tennessee Technological University
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
Licenses | Certifications
State of California
Licensed Civil Engineer
International Code Council
Building Plans Examiner
Affiliations
ICC – Los Angeles Basin Chapter

Page 367 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 11
Professional Summary
Mr. Reiter is a licensed Professional Engineer in Mechanical Engineering with significant experience in public service, specifically with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. Since 2013, he has served as a Principal Mechanical Engineering, Principal Mechanical Engineering Assistant in the Building and Safety Division, where hid responsibilities include reviewing commercial building plans for compliance with mechanical, plumbing, and energy codes. Mr. Reiter has played a key advisory role in implementing a new permit system and frequently collaborates with designers and clients to bring plans up to code.

Before his current role, Mr. Reiter worked in the Flood Maintenance Division from 2006 to 2013 as a Civil Engineering Technician. His work there involved using ArcGIS and MicroStation to map the County’s storm drain network, interpreting storm drain plans, and acting as a liaison between maintenance yards, companies, and other divisions. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from California State University, Northridge, and is noted for his strong organizational skills, ability to work independently, and proficiency with mechanical, plumbing, and energy code interpretation.

Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Principal Mechanical Engineer
Building & Safety Division, County of Los Angeles
Responsibilities include reviewing commercial building plans to ensure compliance with current mechanical, plumbing, and energy codes. The role involves direct interaction with designers and clients to guide them in updating and modifying their plans to meet regulatory standards.

Additionally, this position served as the mechanical and plumbing advisor during the development and implementation of a new permit system, contributing technical expertise to enhance the system’s effectiveness and compliance capabilities
Principal Mechanical Engineer Assistant
Flood Maintenance Division, County of Los Angeles
Responsibilities encompassed a variety of technical and coordination tasks primarily focused on supporting the development and maintenance of the County’s Storm Drain Network. This included the use of ArcGIS to assist in mapping and documenting storm drain infrastructure, contributing to a comprehensive and accurate geospatial database. The role required regular interpretation of storm drain plans to respond to inquiries from both the public and internal divisions, ensuring clarity and accessibility of information regarding County facilities. Additionally, the technician utilized MicroStation and ArcGIS software to produce detailed and precise maps as needed for various engineering and planning purposes.

ERIC REITER, PE
Plan Review
Education
California State University, Northridge
Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering
Licenses | Certifications
State of California
Licensed Mechanical Engineer

Page 368 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 12
Professional Summary
Mr. Eshak is a versatile and accomplished mechanical engineer with extensive experience in both public and private sectors throughout Southern California. He has held positions such as a Principal Mechanical Engineering Assistant for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, where he ensured compliance with California Plumbing and Mechanical Codes for commercial and private buildings. Mr. Eshak is responsible for reviewing mechanical energy efficiency standards, including complex systems such as solar thermal energy installations, refrigerated warehouses, and computer rooms. He is recognized by the California Energy Commission and plays a key role in advising designers and planners on code compliance and future infrastructure planning.

Mr. Eshak contributed significantly as an Engineering Testing Aid III in the Pavement Management Unit, where he helped manage over 3,200 miles of roadway by conducting pavement condition evaluations and utilizing pavement management software, ArcGIS, and MicroStation for project analysis and mapping. Earlier in his career, he served as a Mechanical Engineer at Applied Companies, supporting the design and structural analysis of HVAC systems for military applications. His achievements include authoring a comprehensive 145-page technical manual for a highcapacity ECU system used by the U.S. military. Mr. Eshak holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Loyola Marymount University and is a licensed Professional Mechanical Engineer in California Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Principal Mechanical Engineering Assistant
Building & Safety Division, County of Los Angeles
Ensures that commercial and private building projects comply with California Plumbing and Mechanical Codes. Identifies instances of noncompliance and documents them on correction sheets,
recommending necessary modifications to bring plans into full compliance. Performed extensive reviews related to California Energy standards, covering a range of building types from residential housing to complex facilities such as refrigerated warehouses and computer rooms. Performs all plan checks of solar thermal energy systems reinforcing his expertise in sustainable and energy-efficient system design.

Engineering Testing Aide III
Geotech & Materials Engineering Division, County of Los Angeles Mechanical Engineer
Applied Companies, Environmental Controls Unit

RAMY ESHAK, PE
Plan Review
Education
Loyola Marymount University
Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering
Licenses | Certifications
State of California
Licensed Mechanical Engineer
Affiliations
California Energy Commission

Page 369 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 13
Professional Summary
Samir Y. Ghosn, M.S., P.E., is a Registered Civil Engineer in California, Nevada, and Colorado with more than three decades of experience in structural engineering, building and safety, and municipal plan review. He holds a Master and Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering and has served in numerous positions including Building Official Principal Engineer for the City of Newport Beach, where he led plan review and permit issuance activities for a high-volume development environment exceeding $775 million in annual construction valuation. He directed technical code compliance, structural and geotechnical review, hazard evaluation, and staff training, while working closely with developers, design professionals, and the public to ensure timely approvals and high standards of customer service across residential, commercial, industrial, and specialty structures.

Previously, Mr. Ghosn served as President of JM Consulting Engineers, Director of Building and Safety Services at Harris & Associates, and Regional Building & Safety Manager at Berryman & Henigar, overseeing multidisciplinary projects, conducting complex plan reviews, and managing business development and client relations. His earlier career includes senior engineering roles in construction defect litigation, municipal plan check and inspection for the City of Laguna Beach, and structural design work for nuclear power facilities with Bechtel Power.

Throughout his career, he has combined technical expertise in structural systems and seismic design with leadership, policy development, staff training, and a strong commitment to code compliance and public safety.

Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Building Official
Building Division, City of Newport Beach
Principal Engineer
Building Division, City of Newport Beach
President
JM Consulting Engineers
Director of Building & Safety
Harris Engineers
Regional Manager
Berryman & Henigar
Senior Plan Check Engineer
Building Division, City of Laguna Beach

SAMIR GHOSN, PE
Plan Review
Education
California State University, Long Beach
Master of Science, Civil Engineering
California State University, Fullerton
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
Licenses | Certifications
State of California
Licensed Civil Engineer
International Code Council
Building Plans Examiner
Fire Sprinkler Plans Examiner
Affiliations
International Code Council

Page 370 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 14
Professional Summary
Mr. Adam Marcus, PE, brings more than eight years of professional experience providing building and safety plan review services, with a strong focus on electrical systems and regulatory compliance. As a Licensed Electrical Engineer, he has held progressively responsible roles within both public and private sector organizations, including Plan Review Engineer and Senior Electrical Engineering Assistant with the County of Los Angeles. In these capacities, Mr. Marcus has led the review of complex residential and commercial developments such as mixed-use projects, civic facilities, senior housing, adult-care facilities, parking structures, and multiplex theaters. His work has consistently involved coordinating multidepartmental reviews to ensure comprehensive compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, and policies.

Mr. Marcus is recognized for providing high-level technical and procedural guidance to architects, engineers, and contractors throughout the permitting and construction process, serving as a trusted resource for code interpretation and application. His professional background is supported by a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles, licensure as a California Professional Electrical Engineer, and certification as an ICC Electrical Plans Examiner.

This combination of technical expertise, regulatory knowledge, and public agency experience positions Mr. Marcus as a strong contributor to effective, timely, and compliant building and safety operations.

Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Senior Electrical Engineering Assistant II
Building & Safety Division, County of Los Angeles
Ensures that commercial and private building projects comply with California Electrical Codes. Identifies instances of noncompliance and documents them on correction sheets, recommending necessary modifications to bring plans into full compliance. Performed extensive reviews related to California Energy standards, covering a range of building types from residential housing to complex facilities such as refrigerated warehouses and computer rooms. Performs all plan checks of solar thermal energy systems reinforcing his expertise in sustainable and energy-efficient system design.

Electrical Engineering Assistant I
Geotech & Materials Engineering Division, County of Los Angeles Fresenius Medical Care
Design Engineer

ADAM MARCUS, PE
Plan Review
Education
University of California, Los Angeles
Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering
Licenses | Certifications
State of California
Licensed Electrical Engineer
International Code Council
Electrical Plans Examiner
Affiliations
International Code Council

Page 371 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 15
Professional Summary
Mr. Christman is a seasoned building official and code professional with over three decades of experience in inspection, plan review, and municipal code enforcement. He has served as the Building Official and Supervising Plans Examiner for various jurisdictions where he oversaw plan review operations, ensured compliance with building codes, and managed electronic permit systems. Prior to this, he held key leadership roles including Principal Electrical Inspector and Supervising Building Inspector. His career began with hands-on roles in inspection and construction, including his ongoing work as a licensed general, electrical, and engineering contractor.

Mr. Christman’s qualifications are bolstered by an extensive array of certifications from ICC, FEMA, and other professional bodies, covering all aspects of building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, accessibility, and fire safety codes. He is a Master Code Professional and holds multiple contractor licenses in California. In addition to his technical expertise, he has contributed to disaster response, permit system upgrades, public education through Building Safety Month events, and professional training for staff and the community.

Work Experience
Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Supervising Plans Examiner
Building Division, County of Kauai, HI
Independently review and approve moderately complex building plans and specifications to ensure compliance with applicable building, zoning, and related codes. Identify errors or omissions, provide required corrections, and consult with architects, engineers, and contractors to clarify code interpretations. Coordinate plan routing among relevant agencies, support senior examiners on complex projects, and assist the public with code inquiries and permit processes. Provide counter service by reviewing and processing permit applications, calculating fees, issuing permits, and maintaining subdivision records, while performing other related duties as assigned.

Building Official
Building & Safety Division, City of Rancho Palos Verdes Principal Electrical Inspector
Building Department, City of Huntington Beach
Supervising Inspector
Building Department, City of Santa Monica
Senior Building Inspector
Building & Safety Division, City of Redondo Beach

PAUL CHRISTMAN
Plan Review
Education
University of California, Los Angeles
Engineering Management – Construction
West Los Angeles College
Construction Management
Licenses | Certifications
International Code Council
Master Code Professional
Affiliations

International Code Council
California Building Officials (CALBO)
International Association of Electrical
Inspectors (IAEI)

Page 372 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 16
Professional Summary
Eric Corral is a seasoned building and construction professional with extensive experience in plan review, code compliance, electrical planning, and public sector operations. He currently serves as Plans Examiner II for the City of Fontana, where he reviews commercial, industrial, and residential construction plans for compliance with building, mechanical, plumbing, and electrical codes. He prepares detailed plan check reports, collaborates with architects and engineers to resolve technical issues, issues permits, and conducts field inspections to ensure structural and code compliance.

Previously, he worked with Southern California Edison in various planning roles, coordinating electrical design projects, managing infrastructure upgrades, securing environmental clearances, and supporting crossfunctional engineering and construction teams to deliver safe, codecompliant utility projects.

Mr. Corral holds a master’s degree in human resources management with an emphasis in Organizational Leadership and a bachelor’s degree in public administration from University of La Verne. His professional credentials include multiple ICC certifications in building inspection and plans examination, along with a California contractor’s license, reflecting his comprehensive expertise in building and safety operations.

Work Experience
Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Plans Examiner II
Building Division, City of Fontana, CA
Provides the review and technical evaluation services for tract housing, multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial projects, ensuring full compliance with all applicable building codes, ordinances, and regulatory requirements. Conducts thorough reviews of construction documents, calculations, and specifications to promote safety, accuracy, and timely permit issuance. Deliver responsive, solutionoriented customer service by assisting architects, engineers, contractors, homeowners, and members of the public at the counter, by phone, and through project meetings—helping facilitate clear communication and efficient project delivery.

Planner I
Southern California Edison
Maintenance Worker III
Public Works Department, City of Fontana, CA
Project Manager
Anthony Corral Construction

ERIC CORRAL
Plan Review
Education
National University
Master Human Resources Management
University of La Verne
Bachelor of Science, Public Administration
University of Irvine
Project Management
Licenses | Certifications
International Code Council
Building Plans Examiner
Residential Building Inspector
Commercial Building Inspector
Affiliations

International Code Council
California Building Officials (CALBO)

Page 373 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 17
Professional Summary
Mr. Panos is a seasoned fire service professional with over 25 years of experience focused on fire prevention, community risk reduction, program management, and leadership. He began his career as a Firefighter with the Corona Fire Department and progressed through a wide range of roles, including Fire Inspector, Plans Examiner, Fire Protection Analyst, and Deputy Fire Marshal. His prior positions include Fire Protection Analyst for the Ontario Fire Department, Fire Prevention Supervisor for the San Bernardino County Fire Department, and Deputy Fire Marshal for the Chino Valley Fire District. In addition to his public-sector experience, Mr.

Panos has more than five years of private consulting experience and has served as an instructor for OSFM fire prevention courses for over eight years, reflecting a strong balance of operational expertise, strategic program oversight, and commitment to professional education.

Mr. Panos holds an A.S. in Fire Technology and is completing a B.S. in Fire Protection Administration, complemented by multiple professional certifications such as CFSTES Fire Marshal, Fire Prevention Officer, Fire Protection Specialist, Fire Plans Examiner, and Registered Instructor.

Through Fire Protection Consulting, he offers services including fire prevention program management, inspections, plan checks, code analysis, instruction, and project management. He is actively involved in professional organizations, including California Fire Prevention Officers, Cal Chiefs Fire Marshal Section, and serves as Chair of the FIRESCOPE CRR Subcommittee.

Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Deputy Fire Marshal
Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino
Provides leadership and oversight for comprehensive divisional programs, including permitting, inspections, enforcement, fire prevention and investigations, hazardous materials, emergency response, public education, and cost recovery activities.

Responsibilities include strategic planning, goal development, budget preparation and oversight, policy analysis, legislative review, and continuous program evaluation to ensure operational effectiveness and regulatory compliance.

Fire Protection Analyst
Fire Department, City of Ontario
Fire Prevention Supervisor
Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino
Deputy Fire Marshall
Chino Valley Fire District

ADAM PANOS
Plan Review | Fire
Education
Columbia Southern University
Bachelor of Science, Fire Protection Admin
Crafton Hills College
Associate of Science, Fire Technology
Licenses | Certifications
International Code Council
Fire Plans Examiner
Fire Inspector I
Fire Inspector II
Office of the State Fire Marshall
Registered Instructor
Affiliations
California Fire Preventions Officers
Cal Chiefs Fire Marshall Section

FIRESCOPE
Community Risk Reduction Subcommittee

Page 374 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 18
Professional Summary
Mr. Sifuentes is a seasoned public safety professional with over 17 years of progressively responsible experience in fire service leadership, fire prevention, and emergency management. He currently serves as Fire Marshal for the Montebello Fire Department, where he manages the Community Risk Reduction Division, overseeing fire engineering, arson investigations, cannabis compliance, CERT/public education, and Emergency Operations Center operations. Throughout his career, he has held key leadership roles including Senior Fire Prevention Specialist/Lead Fire Investigator for the City of Torrance Fire Department and Deputy Fire Marshal at the University of California, Los Angeles. His experience includes supervising fire prevention and investigation units, conducting complex origin-and-cause investigations, managing hazardous materials incidents, reviewing major construction projects, and coordinating closely with law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies.

Mr. Sifuentes possesses extensive technical training and certifications in fire inspection, fire investigation, hazardous materials response, emergency management, and anti-terrorism operations. He holds numerous certifications from the California State Fire Marshal’s Office and the International Code Council, including Certified Fire Investigator and Fire Plans Examiner. His background also includes specialized training with agencies such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Department of Homeland Security. An active leader in the profession, he serves as President of the South Bay Fire/Arson Task Force and maintains affiliations with regional fire prevention and arson investigator associations, reflecting his continued commitment to professional excellence and public safety leadership Work Experience
Senior Plan Review Engineer
Cornerstone Municipal Services
Fire Marshal
Fire Department, City of Montebello
Provide leadership and oversight of the City’s fire prevention, fire inspection, ensuring full compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, laws, and regulations. Responsible for planning, organizing, developing, monitoring, and supervising division operations, while maintaining effective coordination with other City departments and stakeholders.

Senior Fire Prevention Specialist/Lead Investigator
Fire Department, City of Torrance
Deputy Fire Marshal-I
Fire Department, University of California Los Angeles
Fire Inspector
Fire Department, City of Montebello

DANIEL SIFUENTES
Plan Review | Fire
Education
Rio Hondo College
Fire Science
Licenses | Certifications
International Code Council
Fire Plans Examiner
Office of the State Fire Marshall
Fire Marshal
Affiliations
California Fire Preventions Officers
Cal Chiefs Fire Marshall Section
California Conference of Arson
Investigators

Page 375 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 19
Cornerstone provides comprehensive Building and Safety Support Services with efficient, reliable, and code-compliant solutions. Services include permitting, plan review, field inspections, and code enforcement, all delivered with a focus on accuracy, consistency, and customer service. By combining technical expertise with a clear understanding of regulatory requirements, we help streamline development processes, ensure public safety, and maintain compliance with applicable building codes, zoning regulations, and local ordinances while serving as a seamless extension of the jurisdiction’s building department.

Plan Review
The plan review process serves as an essential quality control step to confirm that proposed building projects adhere to all relevant codes, regulations, and safety standards before construction begins. During this stage, building and safety specialists carefully evaluate architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and energy plans to ensure design compliance with state and local requirements. The review includes checking for proper occupancy use, fire and life safety measures, accessibility provisions, and structural soundness. When issues or inconsistencies are identified, detailed comments are issued to help applicants make the necessary revisions. Once all corrections are resolved and the plans meet code requirements, approval is granted—allowing the project to move forward to the permit stage with confidence and compliance.

Structural
Licensed engineers and qualified plan examiners evaluate structural drawings and calculations to verify that the proposed design can safely support anticipated loads, resist seismic and wind forces, and maintain structural integrity throughout the building’s lifespan. The review process includes checking materials, foundation systems, framing, lateral force-resisting systems, and connections to confirm code compliance and design accuracy.

Architectural
Our team will evaluate building design documents to ensure compliance for life safety, accessibility, occupancy, and overall building functionality. Additionally, we examine the building layout, exits and egress, fire-rated assemblies, accessibility features, and energy efficiency requirements. The goal is to verify that the proposed design provides safe, functional, and code-compliant spaces for occupants. This review also helps identify potential design conflicts early in the process, facilitating timely corrections, reducing project delays, and supporting the successful approval and construction of the project.

Plumbing | Mechanical | Electrical
Plan review services for plumbing, mechanical, and electrical (PME) systems are performed with a thorough, codedriven approach to ensure full compliance with all applicable local, state, and national regulations. Each review evaluates system design, load calculations, equipment specifications, energy efficiency requirements, and in coordination with architectural and structural plans to identify potential conflicts early in the process. By emphasizing accuracy, constructability, and life-safety considerations, we help streamline the permitting process, reduce revisions, and support efficient project delivery while ensuring that all PME systems are safe, reliable, and designed to perform as intended. SERVICES

Page 376 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 20
Accessibility
Cornerstone’s team of CASp-certified professionals brings extensive expertise in both state and federal accessibility laws, ensuring full compliance with the California Building Code and ADA standards. Our experienced architects and plans examiners offer specialized plan review, evaluation, and consultation services designed to help municipalities and building departments enhance accessibility and meet regulatory requirements. We tailor our services to each client’s goals and collaborate closely to resolve plan review and inspection matters efficiently, resulting in a smoother approval process and successful project delivery.

Fire Life Safety
Our fire plan check services involve a comprehensive review of fire protection and life-safety systems to verify compliance with applicable fire codes, building codes, and local amendments. This includes evaluating fire sprinkler and alarm systems, fire-resistive construction, means of egress, occupant loads, fire access, and emergency systems to ensure coordinated and effective fire protection throughout the project. By identifying deficiencies and coordination issues early, we help expedite approvals, minimize revisions, and ensure that fire protection measures are properly integrated to safeguard occupants, property, and first responders.

Methodology
The plan review process involves evaluation of construction documents to ensure compliance with applicable building codes and local ordinances. Submitted plans are reviewed by qualified professionals across multiple disciplines—such as structural, architectural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire/life safety— to verify code compliance, design coordination, and constructability.

Comments and corrections are prepared and returned to the applicant for revision, with follow-up reviews conducted as needed.

This collaborative and structured process helps identify potential issues early, promotes safe and code-compliant construction, and supports an efficient and transparent permitting process.

Electronic Review
Electronic plan review is provided using digital platforms that allow for timely review, markup, and tracking of documents. This process enables reviewers to provide clear, detailed comments, facilitate quicker revisions, and maintain accurate records. Electronic plan review enhances coordination among jurisdictions, applicants, and design teams by improving accessibility and transparency, reducing turnaround times, and supporting a streamlined, environmentally responsible review process while maintaining the same level of technical rigor and code compliance as traditional reviews.

Correction Lists
Our team will prepare clear, thorough correction lists that identify code deficiencies, coordination issues, and required revisions in an organized and easy-to-understand format. Each correction is supported by applicable code references and concise explanations to assist applicants and design teams in efficiently addressing comments. Our well-structured and consistent correction lists help reduce repeat submittals, promote timely approvals, and support a transparent and collaborative review process that maintains a high standard of code compliance and public safety.

Project Management Portal
We utilize a cloud-based project management system that allows applicants, design teams, and jurisdiction staff to track the status of plan reviews in real time. This system provides secure, centralized access to project documents, review comments, and approval progress, enabling all stakeholders to monitor updates, revisions, and

Page 377 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 21
pending actions efficiently. By offering transparency and easy communication through the platform, we streamline coordination, reduce misunderstandings, and support timely decision-making, ensuring that plan reviews and related processes are managed smoothly and effectively from submission to approval.

Turnaround Times
We will provide a predictable and timely turnaround for plan reviews, recognizing that prompt feedback is critical to keeping projects on schedule. Clear review timelines based on project complexity, scope, and jurisdiction requirements provide efficient and thorough evaluations in order to minimize delays. Cornerstone’s combination of experienced staff, standardized review procedures, and effective communication will ensure that plan review comments are delivered within the agreed-upon timeframes.

Transportation of Plans
Reliable pick-up and delivery services for plans and construction documents to and from the jurisdiction, ensuring that all materials are handled securely and arrive on time. Our team coordinates closely with the jurisdiction and project applicants to schedule pickups and deliveries that align with project timelines, minimizing delays in the plan review and permitting process.

Meetings | Communication
We place a strong emphasis on collaboration and maintain a high level of availability to meet with jurisdictions, project applicants, and design teams throughout all phases of a project. Our staff is willing to participate in in-person or virtual meetings to discuss project requirements, clarify code interpretations, and resolve plan review or inspection-related issues in a timely and cooperative manner. An open communication and a solutionoriented approach results in mutual understanding, reduce delays, and support efficient project delivery while ensuring full compliance with applicable codes and regulations.

Permit Issuance
Permit issuance is an essential step in the City’s development process, serving as the official authorization for construction, renovation, or occupancy to begin. Before a permit is granted, plans are reviewed to ensure compliance with building codes, zoning ordinances, and safety regulations, protecting both the community and future occupants.

The issuance of permits helps cities manage orderly growth, safeguard infrastructure, and uphold standards for structural integrity, fire safety, and environmental responsibility. By requiring permits, municipalities create accountability for builders and property owners while providing a transparent record of development activity that benefits public safety and community planning efforts.
1 st Review + Reviews
Residential*
Commercial*
Residential
Commercial
10 working days
10 working days
5 working days
5 working days

Page 378 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 22
Building Inspection
Building inspection is the one of the final steps in the process of permit issuance that ensures structures are safe, compliant with codes, and built according to approved plans. During an inspection, qualified inspectors carefully examine construction work at various stages—such as foundation, framing, electrical, plumbing, and final completion—to verify that materials, workmanship, and design meet local building and safety regulations. Inspections help identify potential hazards, prevent costly mistakes, and ensure the long-term integrity of a building. By serving as a safeguard for property owners, occupants, and the community, building inspections play a vital role in protecting public health, safety, and welfare while promoting confidence in the construction process.

Code Enforcement
A code enforcement officer is responsible for ensuring that properties and activities within a community comply with local codes, ordinances, and regulations. Their duties include responding to complaints, conducting field inspections, and identifying violations related to building safety, zoning, property maintenance, signage, and other municipal standards. They issue notices of violation, prepare reports, and may coordinate with other departments or legal entities to resolve issues and pursue enforcement actions when necessary. In addition to enforcing regulations, code enforcement officers often educate property owners and the public about compliance requirements, working collaboratively to achieve voluntary corrections whenever possible. Through these responsibilities, they play a key role in protecting public health and safety, enhancing neighborhood appearance, and supporting the overall quality of life in the community.

Page 379 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 23
Application Submission
An application is completed by the owner or owner
representative accompanied by building plans and
supporting documents.

Comprehensive Plan Review
A comprehensive review is performed to ensure
compliance with applicable building codes,
zoning regulations, and safety standards. Plans
and comment lists are returned to the
applicant.

Routing of Plans
The project is assessed to ensure all documents are
complete. Should additional documentation be
required, the applicant is contacted. Once complete,
the plans are routed to appropriate departments for
review.

Inspection
The project is assigned to a qualified inspector
who will perform the initial and supplemental
inspections until the project is approved. These
inspections include
Certificate of Occupancy
If applicable, the COO ensures that the
structure is safe to inhabit. The certificate of
occupancy to be issued by the City.

Approval
Upon final approval, the inspector will update the
City system which will be used as notification to the
City of the project status.

Payment
Staff will confirm that all fees have been paid and/or
accept payment for remaining balance.
2 3
4 5
1 6
Permit Services Flowchart

Page 380 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 24
Project Notification
The notification is received via the City’s preferred
method of communication (email, Bluebeam
session, or in-house system process.) A confirmation
is sent indicating we are in receipt of the files.

Upload Files Received
A project folder is created in the cloud to ensure all
review documents are organized and easily
accessible by the City & Cornerstone’s staff.

Project Management System
The project is added to our project management
system that provides all information relating to
the date the project was received/returned, and
communication with the City and/or applicant.

Team Member Assignment
The project is assessed and assigned to a
qualified team member based on the technical and
complex components. The project will stay with the
assigned team member until approval.

Comprehensive Review
A comprehensive review is performed to ensure
compliance with applicable building codes, zoning
regulations, and safety standards.

Completeness Check
Our team will review the documents to ensure
all required documents are submitted. Should
any documents be missing, notification will be
sent to the City immediately.

Revision | Resubmission
Once the resubmission is received the plans are
routed to our team for an expedited review.

Approval
Upon final approval, plans will be stamped and
returned to the City. The City shall be notified of
the project status via email.
1 2
Applicable Codes
The current applicable
codes will be utilized in the
review unless otherwise
instructed.
3 4
Corrections
Project returned to with all
appropriate documents and
redlines.
6 Applicant Contact
With approval, we will work
with the applicant directly to
get the issues resolved.

Complex Projects
These projects may require
longer review times. This
communication will take
prior to the initial review.
8 5
1 7
Plan Review Flowchart

Page 381 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 25
Inspection Request
Once the request for the inspection is received, the
project is assigned to an ICC certified inspector
based on the complexity of the project.

Review Project Documents
The assigned inspector will review the approved
plans and/or previously issued inspection
correction lists in preparation for the inspection
identifying any unique components and/or
proactively address challenges that may arise.

Inspector Assignment
The project is assessed and assigned to a
qualified team member based on the technical and
complex components. The project will stay with the
assigned team member until approval. The City shall
be immediately notified should this change at any
time.

Inspection Performed
Rough-In Inspections: Foundation, Framing,
Plumbing, Electrical, HVAC
On-going Inspections: Depending on the
complexity of the project, additional
inspections may be required during the
construction process focusing on specific
systems or elements.

Certificate of Occupancy
Upon final review of the City and confirmation
that steps have been completed, the certificate
of occupancy to be issued by the City.

Approval
Upon final approval, the inspector will update
the City system which will be used as
notification to the City of the project status.

Corrections Issued
Should the inspection result in corrections issued, a
comprehensive list will be generated by the
inspector. Simultaneously, details of the required
corrections will be communicated to the appropriate
parties.
2 3
4 6
1 5
7 Inspection Flowchart

Page 382 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 26
Case Initiation
Following an observed violation by an officer or the
receival of a complaint via the City’s website or
phone call, a case is initiated.

Officer Assignment & Inspection
The violation is assessed and assigned to a
qualified team member based on the severity of the
complaint. The officer will initiate an inspection of
the violation. If a violation is not found, the case is closed.

Follow-up Inspection
The assigned officer will conduct a follow up
inspection to confirm if the violation(s) have
been corrected. If the violation(s) are
corrected, the case is closed.

Case Closed
Once the officer has confirmed all violation(s)
are corrected, either voluntarily or through
enforcement action, the case is closed
Referral for Legal Action
If compliance is not achieved, the process may
escalate to Administrative citations or fines,
Civil penalties, Hearing before an
administrative officer or board, Referral to the
City Attorney for legal action, Abatement by the
City (with costs charged to the property owner)
Notice of Violation
If the violation(s) are not corrected following the
courtesy notice, a formal Notice of Violation will be
issued detailing the necessary corrections to avoid
fine or judgement.

Courtesy Notice
A courtesy notice, usually a door hanger or
placard, and a notice is mailed as a warning to
the resident or owner. They have a set amount
of time to fix the violations to avoid a fine or
further legal action.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Code Enforcement Flowchart

Page 383 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 27
Customer service is essential in providing Building & Safety Support Services, as it directly impacts how effectively stakeholders navigate the permitting, plan review, inspection, and code enforcement processes. Homeowners, contractors, developers, and engineers often rely on building and safety departments to guide them through complex regulations and procedures. Providing clear, accurate, and timely information ensures that projects stay on track and avoid unnecessary delays. A strong customer service approach fosters confidence and support between the public and building & safety departments, making it easier to achieve compliance with safety standards.

Effective customer service also enhances
problem-solving and conflict resolution.

Since construction projects often involve strict
deadlines and large financial investments,
misunderstandings or delays in the permitting
or inspection process can lead to frustration.

Cornerstone has knowledgeable, qualified
team members and responsive staff who can
clarify requirements, address concerns, and
provide solutions helps maintain positive
relationships with stakeholders.

Our approach is customer-focused to ensure
that issues such as permit refusals, inspection
failures, or code violations are handled with
professionalism and efficiency, reducing
stress and frustration for applicants. When
residents and professionals feel supported by
the building and safety department, they are
more likely to follow proper procedures and
prioritize compliance.

Clear communication and responsiveness
are essential to effective Building and Safety
services. By providing timely, accurate
information and maintaining open lines of
communication with applicants, contractors,
design professionals, and the public, we help
prevent misunderstandings and reduce project
delays. Prompt responses to inquiries, reliable
plan review turnarounds, and proactive
follow-up ensure issues are addressed early,
keeping projects on schedule while upholding
code compliance and public safety standards.

METHODOLOGY CUSTOMER SERVICE
Problem Solving
Conflict Resolution
Qualified Team
Members
Customer -Focused
Clear
Communication
Responsiveness
Reliable
Turnaround Times

Page 384 of 547 ends

CORNERSTONE 28

FEE SCHEDULE
Percentage
65% of plan check fee**
Plan Check Engineer
$125.00/hour
Plan Check Engineer II
$135.00/hour
Plan Check Engineer III
$145.00/hour
Building Inspector I
$105.00/hour*
Building Inspector II
$115.00/hour*
Building Inspector III
$125.00/hour*
Mileage
IRS Rate
Permit Technician I
$75.00/hour*
Permit Technician II
$85.00/hour*
Permit Technician III
$95.00/hour*

PLAN CHECK PERMIT ISSUANCE INSPECTION
*Travel time shall be negotiated if within 50 miles from City hall. Overtime shall be billed at 1.5 of the defined rate> **When found appropriate, projects shall have a negotiated rate

Page 385 of 547 ends

CONSENT CALENDAR

CITY OF SHAFTER

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2026
DEPARTMENT: Michael James, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICE AND TECHNOLOGY SPACE

IMPROVEMENTS

RECOMMENDATION
Council find that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; approve the establishment of a new capital improvement project in the amount of $100,000 for office and technology space improvements at the Police Department building located at 201 Central Valley Highway; authorize the use of salary savings from unfilled Police Department positions to fund the project; and authorize Staff to solicit, receive, and award proposals consistent with the City’s bidding and procurement policies.

BACKGROUND
Staff has identified a need to establish a new capital improvement project in the amount of $100,000 for office and technology space improvements at the Police Department building located at 201 Central Valley Highway.

The proposed office space improvements consist of converting an area previously used as an employee gym into two offices to accommodate lieutenant personnel. The project is intended to improve operational efficiency and provide additional administrative workspace within the existing facility footprint. The office space improvements have been designed by a professional architect and are ready for bidding.

The proposed technology improvements include replacing the HVAC systems serving the network server room. The existing HVAC equipment has experienced repeated failures and is unable to consistently maintain the critical temperature requirements necessary for reliable operation of the Department’s network and technology infrastructure. Replacing outdated HVAC systems is intended to protect critical equipment, improve system reliability, and maintain the continuity of Police Department operations.

With Council authorization of the project funding, Staff would utilize informal bid procurement procedures consistent with the City’s purchasing policies to complete the proposed improvements. Due to ongoing operational concerns with the server room HVAC system, the HVAC portion of the work would likely be awarded to the City’s contracted HVAC vendor, which currently performs routine maintenance and

Page 386 of 547 ends

POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICE AND TECHNOLOGY SPACE IMPROVEMENTS - 2 -
emergency repair services for City facilities. To expedite completion of the improvements, the Council may also authorize staff to solicit, receive, and award proposals in accordance with the City’s bidding and procurement policies.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed project would establish a new capital improvement project in the amount of $100,000 for office and technology space improvements at the Police Department building located at 201 Central Valley Highway. Funding for the project is proposed to be provided through salary savings generated from currently unfilled positions within the Police Department.

CEQA ANALYSIS
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) of the CEQA Guidelines because it consists of repair, minor alteration, and operations of public structures and facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use as well as the placement and reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structures will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.

APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY
Not Applicable

ATTACHMENTS
None

Page 387 of 547 ends

PUBLIC HEARINGS

CITY OF SHAFTER

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2026
DEPARTMENT: Michael James, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: UPDATES TO USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR VARIOUS

CITY REGULATORY ACTIVITIES, PROGRAMS, AND SERVICES

RECOMMENDATION

1. Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing and consider adoption of Resolution No. 3083, which establishes a schedule of proposed user fees and charges to take effect sixty (60) days following the date of the public hearing.

2. Find and determine that this action has been reviewed per the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City has determined that this Resolution is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment as there is no possibility that the action would result in a significant environmental impact, and because it does not constitute a “project” as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.

BACKGROUND
At its January 21, 2025 meeting, the City Council authorized staff to award a professional services agreement to Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC to prepare a cost of services study (the “Study”) for various regulatory activities, programs, and services provided by the City. The primary intent of the Study was to recommend a new set of user and regulatory fees for the City’s various regulatory activities, programs, and services.

The services for which a City imposes user fees typically derive from an individual person or entity’s action, request, or behavior. Therefore, except in cases where there is a substantial public benefit generated by a City’s involvement in the individual action, user fees for service are designed to provide that the individual bears the cost incurred by the City to provide that service. When a user fee targets “full cost recovery,” the individual is bearing the entirety of the cost. When a user fee targets less than full cost recovery, another City revenue source – the General Fund – subsidizes the individualized activity. User fees are charged at less than full cost recovery when there

Page 388 of 547 ends

UPDATES TO USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR VARIOUS CITY REGULATORY ACTIVITIES,

PROGRAMS, AND SERVICES
- 2 -
is a strong public policy interest in subsidizing the activity due to broad communitybased benefits from the activity, or when necessary to keep a user fee in line with pricing predominant in the region. The user fees proposed as a result of the Study reflect these principles of pricing.

The proposed user fees are designed to comply with applicable federal, state and local laws including that the proposed user fees are not a tax as defined by Article XIII C of the California Constitution, that the proposed user fees are no more than that necessary to cover the reasonable cost of the activities and services addressed by the user fees, and that the manner by which costs are allocated to a payor bear a reasonable and fair relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the activities and services provided by the City.

Ongoing review and adjustment of user fees provides multiple benefits, including keeping pace with general cost inflation; avoiding user fee spikes that are more likely to occur when municipalities leave user fees unchanged for a lengthy period of time; providing user fee payors, City staff, and policymakers with a pattern of consistency that provides information for reliable forecasting and decision-making purposes; helping meet applicant service level expectations by collecting user fees sufficient to properly fund the desired level of service; and promoting generational equity among user fee payors by avoiding long-term stagnation of user fees followed by significant fee increases.

The Study examined various fee categories including Development Services; Public Safety Services; Rental and Enterprise Services; and Administrative Services. The Study excluded Development Impact Fees; Taxes and Assessments; Franchise Fees; and Utility Rates and Services Charges, as these are subject to different approval procedures or are not subject to the same cost of service limitations.

The City anticipates that it will comprehensively examine user fees every five years. In the years between studies, staff has proposed an annual inflationary adjustment to the user fees based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). It is proposed that user fees shall be adjusted annually effective July 1, 2026 and each July 1 thereafter, and that the City Manager, or designee, may administratively adjust the user fees based on the percentage increase in the CPI for Bakersfield-Delano, California, as published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. If the CPI does not change or decreases in any given year, no change shall be made to the user fee schedule. In no event shall the user fees be increased annually to exceed the costs of providing the services. This authorization shall remain effective until revoked by the City Council or until new user fees are adopted.

The City Council will conduct a duly noticed public hearing to receive public testimony regarding the proposed user fees and charges prior to consideration of adoption of the Resolution establishing the updated fee schedule.

FISCAL IMPACT

Page 389 of 547 ends

UPDATES TO USER AND REGULATORY FEES FOR VARIOUS CITY REGULATORY ACTIVITIES,

PROGRAMS, AND SERVICES
- 3 -
The anticipated fiscal impact of the proposed changes to the user fees is approximately $882,950 annually in additional General Fund revenue. It is important to note that while adjusting the user fees will provide a positive fiscal impact in the form of additional revenue, that revenue is not designed to fund new services because the City is prohibited from collecting fees that exceed the reasonable estimated costs of providing the service sought by the applicant. Rather, the anticipated revenue increase is intended to more equitably fund the cost of providing the services, thereby reducing or eliminating General Fund subsidy, except where user fees are intentionally established at rates lower than the estimated costs due to a broad-based community benefit.

CEQA ANALYSIS
This action has been reviewed per the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s environmental regulations. The City, acting as the lead agency, determined that the Resolution is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment as there is no possibility that the action would result in a significant environmental impact, and because it does not constitute a “project” as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.

APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY
Yes

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 3083

Page 390 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
RESOLUTION NO. 3083

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAFTER,

CALIFORNIA UPDATING AND ESTABLISHING USER AND REGULATORY FEES

FOR VARIOUS CITY REGULATORY ACTIVITIES, PROGRAMS, AND SERVICES

SET FORTH IN A COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City of Shafter (the “City”) imposes certain user and regulatory fees established by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City recently retained the services of an independent rate consultant to conduct a Cost of Services Study (the “Study”), which is on file with the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference, analyzing the costs of providing various City regulatory activities, programs, and services (collectively, the “Services”); and WHEREAS, the Study, examined fee-related Services provided by the City, the costs reasonably borne by the City in providing the Services, the beneficiaries of those Services, and the revenues produced by those paying fees and charges for such Services; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that providing these Services is of direct benefit to applicants both separate and apart from the general benefit to the public and therefore, in the interests of fairness to the general public, the City desires to better recover the costs of providing these Services from applicants who have sought or require them by revising its schedule of user fees; and
WHEREAS, based upon the results of the Study, the existing user fees no longer adequately reflect the City’s costs of providing the Services; and WHEREAS, the Study provides adequate evidence to conclude that the revised user fees do not exceed the reasonable estimated costs to provide the Services for which the user fees are charged; and
WHEREAS, the user fees are subject to the provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act, codified pursuant to Government Code section 66000 et. seq. and more specifically the public meeting requirements of section 66016 and the public hearing requirements of section 66018; and WHEREAS, the City made publicly available the Study indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the Services for which the user fees are to be imposed, and the revenue sources anticipated to provide such programs and services at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City has held a duly noticed public hearing at which all oral and written presentations were made as part of a regularly scheduled meeting; and WHEREAS, prior to holding said public hearing, the City published notice in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing pursuant to Government Code section 6062a and provided written notice to any interested party having requested such notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the public hearing and said notices provided that the date, time, and location of the public hearing; and

Page 391 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
Shafter City Council Resolution No. 3083
June 2, 2026

Page 2 ends

2 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the question of whether or not to adjust or establish the user fees for the Services to reflect the estimated amount that is required to recover the estimated reasonable costs to the City in providing such Services; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt the user fees; and WHEREAS, in adopting this Resolution, the City Council is taking action only on those fees for the Services set forth in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, all other fees, charges, taxes, and assessments imposed by the City that have not been modified by this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shafter as follows:

Section 1. Recitals. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. CEQA. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the setting or revision of user fees pursuant to this Resolution is exempt from environmental review under Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), which provides an exemption for the establishment or modification of charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of meeting operating expenses.

Section 3. Findings. The City Council hereby finds that all substantive and procedural requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act have been satisfied and specifically, the City Council further finds the following:
a. based upon the information and documents prepared for and presented to the City Council to support this action, the user fees are for the purposes of and necessary for: (i) meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and benefits; (ii) purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment, or materials; (iii) obtaining funds necessary for the operations and maintenance of City property and facilities; and (iv) any other costs incurred by the City attributable to providing the Services for which the user fees are imposed; and b. the user fees specified by this Resolution do not exceed the reasonably estimated costs of providing the Services for which the user fees are imposed.

Section 4. Adoption of the User Fees. The City Council hereby adopts the Schedule of User Fees and Charges as set forth in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto. Exhibit “A” shall be incorporated into the City’s consolidated schedule of fees.

Section 5. Annual CPI Adjustments. The City Council authorizes annually, effective July 1, 2026 and each July 1 thereafter, that the City Manager, or City Manager designee, may administratively adjust the user fees, without additional City Council action or approval, based on the percentage increase from the prior year annual Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for Bakersfield-Delano, California (“CPI”), calculated by the 12-month change as of April each year as published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, or a similar index if the CPI is no longer published or is otherwise not available. If the CPI does not change or decreases in any given year,

Page 392 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
Shafter City Council Resolution No. 3083
June 2, 2026

Page 3 ends

3 no change shall be made to the user fee schedule applicable that year. In no event shall the user fees be increased annually to exceed the costs of providing the Services. This authorization shall remain effective until revoked by the City Council or until new user fees are adopted.

Section 6. Effect of This Resolution. Any and all provisions of prior resolutions of the City Council establishing or modifying user fees for the Services set forth in Exhibit “A,” are hereby repealed and replaced as of the effective date of this Resolution and the user fees in the manner set forth in Exhibit “A” provided, however, that such repeal shall not excuse or affect the failure of any person or entity to pay any fee heretofore imposed upon such person or entity. The City Council desires to clarify that in adopting this Resolution, it is taking action only on those user fees for the Services set forth in Exhibit “A” which have been modified from prior resolutions of the City Council. All other fees, charges, taxes, and assessments imposed by the City that have not been modified by this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution.

The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one of or more sections, subsections, clauses, or phases be declared invalid or unconstitutional on their face or as applied.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. The user fees contained in Exhibit “A” shall become effective sixty (60) days following adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026.

Chad Givens, Mayor Date
ATTEST:
________________________________________________
Yazmina Pallares, City Clerk Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Marco A. Martinez, City Attorney Date

Page 393 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCHEDULE OF USER FEES AND CHARGES
[User Fee Schedule Attached]

Page 394 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
Schedule of User Fees and Charges – Building & Construction Service/Activity Description Note Fee Charge Basis
Payment of Fees
Fees shall be paid in advance or at the time the fee is capable of calculation. Fees charged for additional work shall be paid prior to the commencement of the additional work for which a fee is assessed, prior to the issuance of a permit, or prior to approval of projects where a time and materials charge has been determined and additional fees have been calculated. Re-inspection fees shall be paid prior to the next succeeding called inspection.

Exceptions: The Building Official may waive payment of additionally charged fees or re-inspection fees if it is determined that the delay or defect which necessitated special fees was occasioned without the fault or neglect of the permittee.

Permit Issuance Fee
For each building, relocation, demolition, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, electrical maintenance, grading, or mobile home site preparation permit application, there shall be a permit issuance fee. Permits may be combined on any project and one issuance fee charged.

Permit Issuance Fee
a) Core Area $30
b) Outside of Core Area $69
Project Processing $97
Permit Extension of Time $106
Permit Fee Minimum
a) Core Area $79
b) Outside of Core Area $120
Fee Refund Policy
Written requests stating the reason for termination must be made within the time limitations for plan checking or start of construction or approved extensions thereof granted by the Department and established by the Building Official. Requests made after expiration of the time limits will not be valid and the fees will be retained by the City. If permit has been issued to applicant, the approved plans and job card must be returned to the department for cancellation along with the letter of request.

Clerical Errors Fee Refund [a] $0
Project Termination by Written Request of the Applicant a) Project Termination by Written Request - Prior to Plan Check [b] $105 b) Project Termination by Written Request - After Plan Check [c] $105 Administrative Fees
Penalty for Work Commenced Without a Permit (penalty fee is in addition to standard fees due for work commenced without a permit) [d] Equal to originally applicable fees Special Inspection/Investigation Fee [e]
a) City Staff Costs $194 per hour
b) Outside Firm / Agency Costs actual cost Time &
Materials
Expungement of Recorded Notice of Building Code or Zoning Ordinance Violation [f]
a) City Staff Costs $194 per hour
b) Outside Firm / Agency Costs actual cost Time &
Materials
Re-inspection / Missed Inspection Fee (for second and subsequent reinspections necessitated by faulty or incomplete work or missed inspections) - each
$117 each
Demolition Permit $43
Change of Occupancy Fee [g] $156

Page 395 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
2 Service/Activity Description Note Fee Charge Basis
Replacement of Plans / Job Card
a) Replacement of Job Copy of Approved Plans $156
b) Replacement of Inspection Record Card $39
Change of Contractor, Architect, Owner Processing $105
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $117
Request / Research for Alternative Methods / Product Review/ Performance Based Design Analysis Review / High Pile Storage Review $194 per hour Moved or Damaged Building Permit - Moved or damaged building permit fees shall be calculated based upon the percentage of damage or the percentage of cost to repair the building. The square footage method of fee calculation shall be used to determine the amount of fee, in relation to the cost to construct a replacement building of similar use. A moved building shall be relocated under the same occupancy as is established under its current legal use. Proposed tenant improvements shall be valued and fees computed after the repairs to the building have been made. a) Minimum percentage of damage 35% of valuation
b) Maximum percentage of damage 60% of valuation
Appeals
a) To Board of Building Appeals of Decision by the Building Official $1,650 b) To City Council of Decision by the Board of Building Appeals $1,650 Hourly Rate or Charges for inspection/research services. Includes work which requires a permit but for which fees are not otherwise provided. a) City Staff Costs $194 per hour
b) Outside Firm / Agency Costs
i) Outside Firm / Agency Costs actual cost Time &
Materials
ii) City Administrative Costs 35% % of vendor
costs
Special Inspection Registration $149 per inspector
Plan Check Fees
The total building permit fee, excluding the permit issuance fee, is composed of 1/3 plan check fee and 2/3 building inspection fee where the permit fee is determined by the percentage method of calculation.

Charge Plan
Check Fees Up
Front
(Min. 1/3 of the
Permit Fee)
Exceptions:
a) The 1/3 plan check fee shall be deleted when no plan is required. The total building permit fee, excluding the permit issuance fee, shall be 2/3 of the permit fee determined by the percentage method of calculation. b) The plan check fee shall be reduced by 50%, or be equal to 1/6 of the building permit fee for a residential occupancy plan which is identical to a plan on which a permit has been issued within the previous six months.

The total building permit fee, excluding the permit issuance fee, shall be 5/6 of the permit fee determined by the percentage method of calculation.

New Construction Permit Fee (Percentage Method of Calculation) New construction for which square footage-based valuation is available shall have permit fees based on the table listed below. Such fees shall include the plan check, building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and strong motion instrumentation fees.

Total Valuation
$1 to $500,000 1.32% % of valuation
$500,001 to $1,000,000
a) first $500,000 of valuation $6,600 base fee
b) valuation in excess of $500,000 up to and including $1,000,000 1.0% % of valuation

Page 396 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
3 $1,000,001 or more
Service/Activity Description Note Fee Charge Basis
a) first $1,000,000 of valuation $11,600 base fee
b) valuation in excess of $1,000,000 0.66% % of valuation Permit fees for State Approved - HCD or DSA factory built housing shall total 50% of the amounts listed above
In determining valuation for the purpose of computing building permit fees, costs per square foot for various types of structures, as published under the heading BUILDING VALUATION DATA in the most current International Code Council (ICC) valuation table, shall be used. Amounts shown shall be multiplied by a factor as shown below. The adjustment factor will effectively reduce the project valuation for fee setting purposes in order to establish a correlation between fees calculated and services provided.

Building Valuation Data Adjustment factor
Most current
table multiplied
by 0.70
Exception: Valuations for agricultural pole buildings (Engineered shade structures with dirt floors only and no work stations; pole footings are included, concrete flat work is exempted from calculation) are as follows:
a) 16 feet or less in height, per square foot Remove Exception b) Over 16 feet in height, per square foot Remove Exception Strong Motion Instrumentation Fee
a) R-Occupancies $0.00013 per $1 const.
value
b) All Other Buildings $0.00028 per $1 const.
value
Community Planning Fee $0.00172 per $1 const.
value
California Building Standards Commission Fee $0.00004 per $1 const. value ($1 min.)
Electrical Permit Fee Schedule (Itemized Method of Calculation) Permit issuance fee, each permit issued
a) Core Area $30
b) Outside of Core Area $69
Services, each $97
Alterations and Additions
a) Where no structural work is being done or where it is impractical to use the percentage method of calculation
i) Receptacles and lighting fixtures, each 10 or fraction thereof $39 ii) Multi-outlet assemblies (plug-mold, light track, etc.), each 20 feet or fraction thereof $39
b) For equipment rated in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (kW), or kilo-volt amps (kVA), the fee for each motor, transformer and/or appliance shall be:
i) 0 through 5 $27
ii) 5.1 through 15 $39
iii) 15.1 through 100 $79
iv) 100.1 through 500 $79
v) Over 500 $79
Notes: For equipment or appliances that have more than one motor, heater, or combination of both, the sum of the combined ratings may be used to compute the fee. These fees shall include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, relays and other directly related control equipment.

Temporary Services
a) Temporary or construction services including pole or pedestal $97 b) Additional supporting poles, each $27
Miscellaneous
Service/Activity Description Note Fee Charge Basis

Page 397 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
4 Area lighting standards (over six feet in height)
a) Up to and including ten on a site, each $27
b) Over ten on a site, each $13
Temporary sale stands, Christmas tree lots, etc. (including service) $53 Overhead line construction, poles and anchors, each (in addition to all other applicable fees in this schedule) $13
Illuminated Sign - alteration of any existing sign, each $52 Solar (Photovoltaic)
a) Solar (PV) less than 10kW $105
b) Solar (PV) greater than 10kW $105
c) Each additional string (<20) $13
Mechanical Permit Fee Schedule (Itemized Method of Calculation) Permit issuance fee, each permit issued
a) Core Area $30
b) Outside of Core Area $69
For the installation or relocation of forced-air or gravity-type furnaces or burners, including ducts and vents attached to such appliances $64 For the installation or relocation of combination heating/air conditioning units, including ducts and vents attached to such appliances $52 For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, wall heater, floor mounted unit heater, or floor furnace (no ducts) $39
For the installation or relocation of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit $19
For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, comfort cooling unit, absorption unit, or each comfort heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls.
$19
For the installation or relocation of boilers or compressors $64 For the installation or relocation of absorption system (Note: This fee shall not apply to air handling unit which is a portion of a factory-assembled appliance, comfort cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required.)
$64
For each air handling unit up to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto (Note: This fee shall not apply to air handling unit which is a portion of a factory-assembled appliance, comfort cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required.)
$52
For each air handling unit over 10,000 cubic feet per minute $52 For each evaporative cooler other than portable type $26 For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct $19 For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air conditioning system authorized by a permit $19
For the installation of each commercial hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood $143
For Installation or relocation of freestanding fireplace, including vent $79 For Installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial type incinerator $79
For each appliance or piece of equipment not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this schedule $79 Mechanical Change-Out
a) Condenser Only $64
b) Furnace Only $64
c) Other Equipment $79
d) Packaged Unit $64
e) Repair / Alteration $19
f) Split-System $117

Page 398 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
5 Service/Activity Description Note Fee Charge Basis
Plumbing Permit Fee Schedule (Itemized Method of Calculation) Permit issuance fee, each permit issued
a) Core Area $29
b) Outside of Core Area $69
For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping, and back-flow protection therefore) $26 For each building, mobile home, commercial coach or manufactured house sewer
$52
For rain water systems, each drain (inside building) $26 For each water heater or vent $21
For gas-piping system outlet
a) First $26
b) each additional, per outlet $13
For each grease interceptor or industrial waste pre-treatment interceptor, including its trap, vent, and traffic slab $52
For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and/or water treating equipment, each fixture $26
For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, per fixture or unit $26 For each vacuum breaker or back-flow protective device $19 For each water service $40
For each outlet not serving a fixture, each outlet $13
For each private sewage disposal system consisting of one septic tank, seepage pit, cesspool, or drain line
a) First $78
b) each additional $40
For any change or repair to existing septic tank, seepage pit, or drain line $78 For the abandonment of septic systems $52
For each graywater system $52
Solar (Thermal) $52
Special / Miscellaneous Permits
Permit issuance fee, each permit issued
a) Core Area $29
b) Outside of Core Area $69
Awning / Canopy (Supported by Building) $234
Balcony Addition $313
Block/Retaining Wall
a) Block Wall - First 100 LF $117
b) Block Wall - Each Add'l 50 LF $13
c) Retaining / Combination Wall - Each 50 LF $13
Commercial Coach / Temporary Trailer Installation $195
Disabled Access Compliance Inspection $194 per hour
Fence
a) Fence - First 100 LF $117
b) Fence - Each Additional 50 LF $13
Fireplace - Masonry $389
Patio Cover / Covered Porch / Lattice
a) Standard, Open, Pre-Engineered (First) $195
b) Standard, Enclosed, Pre-Engineered (First) $313
c) Special Design (First) $195
d) Each Additional $78
Pool / Spa
a) Swimming Pool / Spa $313
b) Detached Spa / Water Feature $195
Service/Activity Description Note Fee Charge Basis

Page 399 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
6 c) Gunite Alteration $313
d) Equipment Changeout Alone $117
Re-roof - Residential
a) Re-Roof - Up to 2,000 SF $78
b) Re-Roof - Each Additional 1,000 SF $13
Sign
a) Monument Sign - First $195
b) Monument Sign - Each Additional $39
c) Wall/Awning Sign - First $117
d) Wall/Awning Sign - Each Additional $52
Storage Racks (8' Tall Max. Height)
a) Storage Racks - First 100 LF $155
b) Storage Racks - Each Additional 100 LF $13
Stucco Application
a) Stucco Application - First 500 SF $103
b) Stucco Application - Each Additional 500 SF $13
Foundation Only Permits (minimum) $234
Window Replacement
a) Window Replacement - Up to 5 Windows $78
b) Window Replacement - Each Additional Window $13
Notes:
* Core Area is area within City limits North of Riverside Street and West of Cherry Avenue. [a] Clerical errors on the part of the City, resulting in overpayment. Refund, in full, fees paid that exceed the true and correct fee. [b] Request prior to any plan checking or other work being done by the department. Refund of fees paid, including plan check fees, but less the issuance, the processing, California Building Standards Commission fee, and strong motion instrumentation fees. [c] Request any time after plan check by the department has started, but prior to start of construction. Refund of fees paid, less all plan check fees and less the issuance, the processing, California Building Standards Commission fee, and strong motion instrumentation fees. [d] For work commenced without a permit applicant shall pay penalty fee, plus any originally required fees for work (i.e. applicant will pay 2x original fees for commencing work without a permit). [e] For inspection, investigation and research of any work done without benefit of required permits or any land use not in compliance with any City Ordinances. This charge may also include file preparation, consulting, and any applicable administrative costs. Also applies to any special inspection/investigation at the request of the public. [f] Expungement of Recorded Notice of Building Code or Zoning Ordinance violation. This charge shall include all file preparation, investigation, consulting, administrative, recordation, public hearing, and any other costs associated with the processing and correction of the violation.
[g] For the survey of a structure to determine what changes must be made to qualify a building for desired type of occupancy (including garage conversion).

Page 400 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
7 Schedule of User Fees & Charges - Planning
Service/Activity Description Fee Charge Basis
Conditional Use Permit $7,495 per application
Minor Variance $3,170 per application
Major Variance $5,650 per application
General Plan Amendment $9,355 per application
Zone Change $8,670 per application
Specific Plan Review $19,955 per application
Density Bonus $6,210 per application
Developer Agreement
Preparation $10,000
Deposit with charges at
the fully allocated hourly
rates for staff involved
plus any outside contract
costs.

Tentative Parcel Map $6,395 per application
Tentative Tract Map
Up to 100 lots - $8,740 plus $25 per lot
More than 100 lots - $11,115 plus $14 per lot
over 100 lots
each map
Tentative Map Amendment $1,415 per application
Final Map Review $9,030 per map
Final Map Amendment $2,930 per map
Lot Line Adjustment $4,915 per application
Parcel Merger $5,385 per application
Parcel Map Waiver $4,915 per application
Outside Services - Map/Dev
Review Actual costs plus 25% for administrative costs.

Categorical Exemption Review $695 per application
Environ Negative Declaration
Review 20% of the consultant cost for review of the consultant-prepared document Environmental Impact Report
Review 20% of the consultant cost for review of the consultant-prepared document Annexation $20,230 per application
Williamson Act Review
New Contract - $5,520
Non-Renewal - $5,520
Cancellation - $8,560
per application
Change Of Conditions Approval $3,725 per application
Time Extension - Plan Comm $1,615 per application
Time Extension - Plan Com &
Council $2,355 per application
Planning Sign Permit $465 per application
Special Display Permit $70 per application
Temporary Land Use Permit Temporary Occupancy Permit (minor) - $1,180 Temporary Land Use Permit (major) - $2,120 per application Planning Business Zoning Review $70 per business
Home Occupation Permit $70 per application
Street Name Change $2,355 per application
Deed Restrict Removal On
Property $3,725 per application
Plan Comm/City Council Appeal Planning Commission - $3,040 City Council - $5,095 per appeal
Planning Building Plan Review 15% of Building Plan Check Fee Land Review - Prelim Site Plan
Rev. Remove/Waive
Final Develop. Plan - Staff
Review Remove/Waive
Architectural Review Remove/Waive
Community Planning Surcharge Remove/Waive

Page 401 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
8 Technology Surcharge Remove/Waive
Extra Planning Review/Inspection Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs.

Miscellaneous Planning Services Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs.

Schedule of User Fees & Charges – Engineering & Public Works Service/Activity Description Fee Charge Basis
Info Tech Development Review Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside contract costs.

Subdiv Public Improve Plan
Chk/Insp
Up to 20 lots - 6% of improvement cost
More than 20 lots - 4.25% of improvement cost
per set of improvement
plans
Non-Subdiv Priv Impr Plan
Chk/Insp
First five acres - $770
Each additional acre - $46
per set of improvement
plans
Certificate Of Compliance Remove/Waive
Special Study Review Actual contract cost plus 25% administrative fee Special District Formation Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs.

Easement Creation Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs.

Right-Of-Way Vacation Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs.

Reversion To Acreage Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs.

Encroachment Permit
Permit Processing/Application Intake - $105
Minor Encroachment
Plan Review $160
Inspection - $290
Major Encroachment:

Plan Review - $640
Inspection - $385 plus $130 per day after first
day
Expedited Request - 1.5 x standard fee
Non-Standard Project - Fully allocated hourly
rate for all staff involved plus actual contract
cost with 25% administrative fee
per application/permit
Oversize Load Permit One Day - $16
Annual - $90
Charge minimum set by the
State of California, if
applicable.

Well Permit - Public/Private $400
per application plus $1,000
deposit with charges for
actual contract costs
Time Extension - Engineering $410 per application
Revision Review - Engineering Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs.

Excessive Engineering
Resubmittal (Four or More
Reviews)
Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs (4 hour minimum).

After Hours Engineering
Inspection
Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs (2 hour minimum).

Engineering ReInspection/MissedCharge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs (2 hour minimum).

Page 402 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
9 Miscellaneous Engineering
Services
Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved and outside contract costs.

Page 403 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
10 Schedule of User Fees & Charges – Public Safety
Law/Code Enforcement
Service/Activity Description Fee Charge Basis
Code Enforcement Inspection $150 per inspection
Vehicle Abatement Public Property - $525 per vehicle
Weed Abatement Actual abatement costs plus 50%
administrative charge
False Alarm Response
First two responses within a 12-month
period - No Charge
Each subsequent response - $150
First two responses within a 12-
month period - No Charge
Each subsequent response -
$150
Special Police Service Request Actual time spent at the overtime rate.

Vehicle Impound/Release $180 per vehicle
Vehicle Repossession $15 or as limited by State law per vehicle Citation Sign-Off $20 per citation
Vehicle Inspection Service Remove/Waive
Concealed Weapon Permit
Initial Application - $200
Renewal - $25 (limited by State Law)
Amended License - $10 (limited by State
Law)
per application/permit
Clearance Letter $40 per letter
Dance Permit Remove/Waive
Fingerprinting On Request $40 plus DOJ fees per scan
Police Report Copy
This fee is limited by the Public Records
Act
First 5 pages - No Charge
Each additional page - $0.20 per page
Animal Control
Service/Activity Description Fee Charge Basis
Spay/Neuter Service Charge the actual veterinary expenses.

Deceased Animal Pickup $130 per animal
Animal Control Yard Inspection $130 per inspection
Animal Home Quarantine Review $130 per review
Dangerous Animal Inspection $130 per inspection
Dangerous Animal Hearing $2,165 per hearing
Commercial Kennel Inspection $130 per inspection
Carnival Animal Inspection $130 per inspection
License Fees
Natural Dog
a) One Year Option $60
b) Two Year Option Remove/Waive
c) Three Year Option $120
Altered Dog
a) One Year Option $15
b) Two Year Option Remove/Waive
c) Three Year Option $30
Service Dog License Remove/Waive
Delinquent Penalty $60
Lost Tag Replacement $10
Dangerous Animal License (Annual) $130
Service/Activity Description Fee Charge Basis
Impound Fees

Page 404 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
11 Licensed Animal - Unaltered
a) First Impound $50
c) Second Impound $80
d) Third Impound and Subsequent
Impounds $160
Licensed Animal - Altered
b) Altered First Impound $15
c) Second Impound $30
d) Third Impound and Subsequent
Impounds $60
Unlicensed Animal - Unaltered
a) First Impound $75
b) Second Impound $150
c) Third Impound and Subsequent
Impounds $300
Unlicensed Animal - Altered
a) First Impound $40
b) Second Impound $80
c) Third Impound and Subsequent
Impounds $160
Dangerous Animals
a) First Impound $150
b) Second Impound $300
c) Third Impound and Subsequent
Impounds $450
Impound Fine for Nonspayed or Unneutered Animal
First Impound $35
Second Impound $50
Third Impound and Subsequent Impounds $100
Care and Feeding Per Day
Up to 100 lbs $20
Over 100 lbs $30
Female Dog in Season $20
Owner Surrender Animals
Healthy Delivered to Shelter $50
Euthanized Delivered $75
Picked Up Remove/Waive
Adoption
Dog $75
Cat $40
Animal Trap Rental Fees
Rental Deposit Remove/Waive
Per Day Rental Fee Remove/Waive
Reclaiming Trap Remove/Waive

Page 405 of 547 ends

17236.01004\44674986.1
12 Schedule of User Fees & Charges - Utilities
Service/Activity Description Fee Charge Basis
Utility Sign-Up Service $20 per application
Lost Utility Bill Replacement $20 per bill
Water Delinquent Turn Off/On $70 per site visit
Cut Water Meter Lock Repair $145 per occurrence plus actual cost of materials & supplies Meter Tampering/Broken Valve Repair
Charge the fully allocated hourly rate for all personnel involved, supplies, and outside contract costs
(2 hour minimum).

After Hours Water Turn Off/On $150 per request
Excessive Water Turn On/Off Request $100 per request
Temporary Fire Hydrant Meter Rental
$25 per meter closeout
Meter Security Deposit -
$1,000
Water usage is charged at
the approved water rates
per meter rental
Water Theft Fine
Theft from Fire Hydrant -
$1,000
Other:

First Offense - $500
Second and each
additional offense in a 12-
month period - $1,000
Refuse Bin Replace/Additional Bin Remove/Waive
Fiberoptic System Program Negotiated rates with Internet Service Providers

Page 406 of 547 ends

PUBLIC HEARINGS

CITY OF SHAFTER

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 2, 2026
DEPARTMENT: Alan Cazares, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7461

RECOMMENDATION
Council find the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; conduct a public hearing; and adopt Resolution No. 3084, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Shafter, finding the action has already complied with the California Environmental Quality Act, and approving an amendment to the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 7461 located at the northwest corner of the intersection of 7th Standard Road and the future Lake Road within the Mission Lakes Specific Plan area.

BACKGROUND
Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 7461 was approved by the Shafter City Council on January 07, 2025, pursuant to Resolution No. 3005, to subdivide 82.53 gross acres into 281 single family residential lots, 1 public park, 1 sump lot, and 6 public landscape lot (including a Nature Trail). Now the applicant has submitted a request to change the compliance timing triggers for several conditions and make other minor revisions that will eliminate redundancy and provide clarity. Most of the conditions being revised are related to the completion of the 2.69-acre public park within the development, shown as Lot A in the approved Tentative Map. The park in the tract falls within the jurisdiction of North of the River Recreation & Parks District (NOR) and is required to be dedicated/deeded to NOR. Therefore, NOR was given an opportunity to review the subdivision design and provide conditions of approval related to the development of the proposed park sites. The conditions relevant to NOR are shown in Exhibit B of Resolution No, 3005 as conditions of approval #18 and #159 through 165.

The applicant has requested that the timing for compliance with NOR requirements be changed to afford more time for the Condition to be completed while allowing the owner to continue to develop the tract. It’s important to note that the proposed revisions will not absolve Lennar Homes of complying with any of the conditions but rather they provide additional time to obtain compliance. Lennar Homes will still be fully responsible for developing the park site and surrounding public improvements at their own expense.

Several conditions require completion prior to the recordation of a final map for 7461.

However, Lennar is about ready to record a final map, and the process to satisfy the

Page 407 of 547 ends

AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7461 - 2 -
NOR requests is taking more time than previously anticipated. Lennar’s request is to defer these items.

All the amendments can be found in Exhibit A of Exhibit 1 in strikethrough / underlineformat. If the Planning Commission and City Council approve, the tracked changes will be accepted on the master Word document. The affected conditions of approval are the existing #18, 26, 35, 156, 157, 159, 160, 162, and 163. A summary of the change to each condition is listed below.
• Condition #18: changes compliance deadline from prior to final map recording to prior to receiving 60% occupancy
• Condition #26: removes the requirement to receive approval from City of Bakersfield on the final map, since their signature may be omitted pursuant to SMA section 66436
• Condition #35: updated to comply with Senate Bill 937 regarding when development and impact fees are required to be paid
• Condition #156: removed requirement to record covenant regarding proximity of certain lots to existing plugged wells, since a general note is already shown on the title sheet of the final map which addresses the same issue. • Condition #157: updated language for clarity
• Condition #159: changes compliance deadline from prior to final map recording to prior to receiving 60% occupancy
• Condition #160: changes compliance deadline from prior to final map recording to prior to receiving 60% occupancy
• Condition #162: instead of requiring a covenant to be recorded prior to final map recording, a disclosure notice will be shown on the face of the final map which will address the same issue
• Condition #163: condition removed due to redundancy – already covered in another condition
Pursuant to Title 16 Section 4.80.C, modification of a tentative map after approval or conditional approval shall not extend the time limits imposed by the Shafter Subdivision Ordinance. The tentative map approval for tract 7461 is still set to expire on January 07, 2027.

At the May 12th Planning Commission regular meeting, a public hearing for this item was held by the Commission. The Commissioners unanimously voted in favor of adopting Resolution No. 26-485 to recommend approval to the City Council of the amendment to the Conditions of Approval for 7461.

FINDINGS:

1. All required public notices have been given. Hearing notices regarding the proposed project were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project area, and published in a local newspaper of general circulation at least 10 days prior to the hearing.

Page 408 of 547 ends

AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7461 - 3 -

2. The City Council finds that the requested amendment of conditions is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the Shafter General Plan and Mission Lakes Specific Plan and is consistent with the applicable development policies and standards of the City.

3. The City Council finds the requested amendment of conditions would not impair the integrity and character of the Shafter General Plan or Mission Lakes Specific Plan.

4. The City Council finds that the requested amendment of conditions does not alter the subdivision design or improvements, so the design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan and the Mission Lakes Specific Plan.

5. The City Council finds that the requested amendment of conditions does not impair the ability of the subdivision design to provide, to the extent feasible, future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities within the subdivision.

6. The City Council finds that the requested amendment of conditions does not alter the site. The site remains physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development.

7. The City Council finds that the requested amendment of conditions is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

8. The City Council finds that the requested amendment of conditions is not likely to adversely affect public health, safety, or general welfare. The development remains compatible with surrounding properties and will not create any public nuisance.

9. The City Council finds that the requested amendment of conditions will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within Tract 7461.

10. The City Council finds the requested amendment of conditions does not affect the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing sewer system and will not result in a violation of existing requirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

11. The City Council finds that the requested amendment of conditions will not result in any change to water, sanitation, public utilities and services. Adequate provisions of urban services remain, to ensure public health and safety.

12. The City Council finds that the City of Shafter certified a Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2005 General Plan Update and related actions (SCH No. 2004101029) including the Mission Lakes Specific Plan (Resolution No. 05- 1738) and that no additional CEQA analysis or documentation is required to amend the conditions of Tentative Tract Map No. 7461.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact because of the proposed action.

CEQA ANALYSIS
The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, i.e., exempt from the requirements of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code, pursuant to California Government Code 65457. The project is within

Page 409 of 547 ends

AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7461 - 4 -
the scope of the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified for the Mission Lakes Specific Plan in 2005 (SCH No. 2004101029) pursuant to Resolution No. 05-1738. The certified Program EIR adequately describes the activity of the residential development to be governed by this Tentative Tract Map No. 7461 Amendment of Conditions and is consistent with the Mission Lakes Specific Plan and approved alteration thereof.

APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY
Not Applicable

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 3084

2. Exhibit A to Resolution No. 3084

Page 410 of 547 ends

EXHIBIT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 3084

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAFTER

FINDING THE ACTION HAS ALREADY COMPLIED WITH THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7461 WHEREAS, on January 07, 2025, the City Council approved Tentative Tract No. 7461 pursuant to Resolution No. 3005 for a 281-lot residential subdivision, subject to 171 conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, at its regularly scheduled meeting on May 12, 2026 approve Resolution No. 26-485; a resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Shafter recommending that the City Council approve the amendment to the conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (Developer) is requesting approval of an Amendment to the Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract No. 7461 (the “Project”) as shown in Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, through the City Clerk, did set Tuesday, June 02, 2026, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 336 Pacific Avenue, Shafter, California, as the time and place for a public hearing before said City Council on said proposal, and notice of the public hearing was given in the manner provided in Title 16 of the Shafter Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed public hearing for the Project was held by the City Council of the City of Shafter at its regular meeting on June 02, 2026, at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Project; and WHEREAS, the facts presented in the staff report and evidence at the above referenced public hearing support the findings contained in this resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the Shafter General Plan and the Mission Lakes Specific Plan, and is consistent with the applicable development policies and standards of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project will not impair the integrity and character of the City of Shafter General Plan or Mission Lakes Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project will not alter the subdivision design or improvements, so the design and improvements are consistent with the General Plan and the Mission Lakes Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project will not impair the ability of the subdivision design to provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities within the subdivision; and

Page 411 of 547 ends

Shafter City Council Resolution No. 3084
June 02, 2026

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project will not alter the site. The site remains physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within Tract 7461; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project will not affect the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing sewer system and will not result in a violation of existing requirements prescribed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project will not result in any change to the provision for water, sanitation, public utilities, and services to ensure public health and safety; and WHEREAS, the Project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or materially injurious to properties and improvements in vicinity of the Project site; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City of Shafter certified a Program Environmental Impact Report for the Mission Lakes Specific Plan in 2005 (SCH No. 2004101029) pursuant to Resolution No. 05-1738 and that no additional CEQA analysis or documentation is required for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been followed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Shafter Planning Department (336 Pacific Avenue, Shafter, California) is the custodian of all documents and other materials upon which the environmental determination is based.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Shafter, in a regular session assembled on the 2nd day of June 2026, hereby finds the action has already complied with CEQA and approves the amendment to the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 7461, located at the northwest corner of the intersection of 7th Standard Road and the future Lake Road, as shown in Exhibit “A” to Resolution No. 3084.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd DAY OF JUNE, 2026.
__________________________________
Chad Givens, Mayor
ATTEST
__________________________________
Yazmina Pallares, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
__________________________________
Marco Martinez, City Attorney

Page 412 of 547 ends

1 EXHIBIT “A”

AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7461

GENERAL

1. The owner(s), project proponent(s), and/or applicant(s) (hereinafter referred to as “Developer”), solely at their cost and expense, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Shafter (hereinafter referred to as “City”), its agents, legislative bodies, officers and employees regarding any legal or administrative action, claim or proceeding concerning approval of Tentative Tract No. 7461 and/or related actions including, without limitation, actions taken or not taken with respect to the California Environmental Quality Act (hereinafter referred to as “CEQA”); or, at its election and in the alternative, shall relinquish such approval. Developer shall assume the defense of the City in any such legal or administrative action, claim or proceeding with legal counsel paid for in the entirety by Developer, but subject to the City's reasonable approvals. Developer shall also reimburse the City, its agents, legislative bodies, officers and employees for any judgments, amounts paid in settlements, court costs and attorneys' fees which the City, its agents, legislative bodies, officers and employees may be required to pay or otherwise pay because of such action, claim, or proceeding. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, claim or proceeding, but such participation shall not relieve Developer’s obligations under these conditions of approval (hereinafter referred to as “Conditions”).

2. The Developer or the Developer’s engineer shall submit a list of all contractors and/or subcontractors performing work on this project to the City Administrative Services Department and such contractors and subcontractors shall obtain valid business licenses to do business and/or work in the City of Shafter.

3. The following disclosure shall be given as part of transfer of properties: “All your real property is near property used for agricultural operations, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations on any 24-hour basis. Said discomforts may include, but not be limited to equipment noises, odors from manure or other chemicals, and dust or smoke. The City has determined that the use of real property for agricultural operations is a high priority and favored use to the City and Kern County and will not be considered a nuisance for those inconveniences or discomforts arising from agricultural operations, provided such operations are consistent with accepted customs, standards, and laws.”

4. Until all portions of the tentative tract have been developed, all vacant and undeveloped land, not being actively farmed, shall be maintained in a weed-free and clean manner by the Developer. Should said property not be so maintained, the City shall notify the property owner that the property is to be cleaned within thirty (30) days of receipt of said notice. If the property owner does not comply within the required time frame, City may then clear the land and bill the property owner for expenses incurred.

Page 413 of 547 ends

2 5. Unless a final map is recorded, this tentative tract shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval by the City Council, unless an extension is granted by the City Council.

Should an extension be requested, Developer, not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date, shall submit to the City, the applicable processing fees and a completed application requesting an extension of the map approval in accordance with the provisions of City Code and the Subdivision Map Act. PLEASE NOTE: This will be the only notice given for the above specific expiration date. The applicant is responsible for initiating an extension request.

6. All construction and development shall be consistent with the City of Shafter Mission Lakes Specific Plan and Tentative Tract No. 7461.

PLANNING

7. Prior to initiating any grading or earthmoving within Tract No. 7461, the Developer shall provide the City of Shafter Planning Department with written confirmation from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) that the proposed development follows the requirements of the District’s Rule 9510.

8. The Developer shall be required to permanently maintain all landscaping, except for landscaping included in the Community Facilities District, including the replacement of any trees or shrubs that do not survive.

9. Approved street names are as follows: Artesia Lane, Tidewater Way, Salmon Drive, Trout Lane, Badger Lane, Darwin Drive, Pigeon Drive, Oxbow Way, Fisher Lane, Shoreview Drive, Tadpole Lane, Mallard Landing Lane, Water View Drive, Peninsula Lane, South Lake Drive, Sandridge Lane, Mariner Drive, Angler Drive, Quickwater Lane, Klamath Lane, Rocky River Lane, Yosemite Drive, Mission Lake Boulevard, and Lake Road.

10. Only the street names or alternate street names that have been approved on the attached Tentative Tract Map shall be shown on the Final Map(s) for Tract No. 7461. If the Developer wishes to change the street names at any point in time, a street name change request will need to be submitted to the Shafter Planning Department and approved prior to changing or using any proposed street names.

11. If at any point the Developer wishes to phase the map or make any changes to the approved tentative map contents, the Developer shall submit a Substantial Conformance application to the Planning Director for review and approval.

12. Approved access shall be provided for each lot in accordance with City standards.

13. All roof-mounted air conditioning equipment shall be located on the rear portion of the roof ridge line in such a manner as to be screened as much as practical from view from public streets.

14. With the exception of model houses, as provided in Section 3.080, Chapter 3, Title 16 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Shafter Municipal Code, no building permit shall be issued by the City of Shafter until Tract No. 7461 has been recorded pursuant to the requirements

Page 414 of 547 ends

3 of Title 16 (Subdivision Ordinance) and Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Shafter Municipal Code.

15. If Condition No. 153 is initiated by the Developer and executed by the City of Shafter, no building permit shall be issued until wet utilities have been installed, an all-weather surface roadway is completed on the subject property, and survey stakes or other form of temporary documentation will be provided for, and approved by the Building and Safety Inspector, to verify building location. Missing stakes or other temporary documentation will result in delays in inspection schedule.

16. The following note shall appear on the final map and all grading and construction plans:
a. If during grading or construction, any plugged, abandoned, or unrecorded oil or gas wells are uncovered or damaged, the California Department of Conservation/Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) shall be contacted to inspect and approve any remediation required.
b. If any abandoned water wells are located within the development or discovered during excavation or grading, the Kern County Public Health Department - Environmental Health Services Program must be contacted to obtain information for the proper permitting and destruction procedures.
c. Building setbacks on lots with existing plugged wells shall satisfy the requirements of the CalGEM. If the recommended setbacks cannot be satisfied, the Developer shall submit, concurrent with the submittal for a building permit for the impacted lot, written confirmation from the CalGEM that the setback provided is acceptable.

17. During grading operations, all activity shall be restricted to periods of low wind to reduce dust emissions. Verification of compliance will be the responsibility of the City of Shafter Building Inspection Division.

18. Prior to construction, the Developer shall submit plans for the public park to be developed on Lot A, approved under Tentative Tract No. 7461. The public park design shall be approved by the City of Shafter in consultation with the North of the River Recreation and Park District. The public park shall be fully constructed, landscaped, and completed, consistent with the Mission Lakes Specific Plan, prior to 60% occupancy recordation of the final map or shall be included as a public improvement in the subdivision improvement agreement. The public park shall be dedicated/deeded to the North of the River Recreation and Park District upon completion and acceptance of all improvements by the City of Shafter.

As an alternative to dedication and transfer of ownership of the public park to the North of the River Recreation and Park District, and subject to authority granted in state law, Developer may request the City consider alternative arrangements for the dedication and transfer of the public park, as authorized by state law, either to the City of Shafter or a combination of the City of Shafter and the North of the River Recreation and Park District.

Such alternative arrangements shall be memorialized in an agreement approved by the City of Shafter and the North of the River Recreation and Park District, prior to acceptance of all

Page 415 of 547 ends

4 improvements by the City of Shafter (except for the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for model homes). Nothing contained herein shall obligate the City or the North of the River Recreation and Park District to accept such alternative dedication and transfer

19. The Developer of Tract No. 7461 shall comply with all SJVAPCD requirements while grading and developing the site. It is the Developer’s responsibility to contact the SJVAPCD to determine with which requirements/rules the Developer must comply.

20. Prior to recordation of Tract Map No. 7461, the Developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Shafter, in a form and substance reasonably approved and required by the City, which shall provide for a minimum square footage of residential units within the subdivision, and which shall provide for payment of park fees, traffic fees and/or other fees established by the City.

21. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in such a way as to allow for them to be extended into any future residential development areas.

22. The Natural Trail along the south and east boundaries of the map shall be planted with a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees at a density sufficient to provide a year-round visual buffer. Tree species and spacing shall be approved by the City as part of the approval of the landscape plan for the Natural Trail.

23. The drive approaches on the following lots shall be installed as specified:
a. Lot 1 – west side of lot on Salmon Drive
b. Lot 15 & 50 – north side of lot on Trout Lane
c. Lot 32 – south side of lot on Badger Lane
d. Lot 43 – east side of lot on Salmon Drive
e. Lot 44 – south side of lot on Trout Lane
f. Lot 51 & 65 – north side of lot on Artesia Lane
g. Lot 57 & 58 – south side of lot on Artesia Lane
h. Lot 33 & 84 – north side of lot on Badger Lane
i. Lot 91 – south side of lot on Badger Lane
j. Lot 92 – west side of lot on Shoreview Drive
k. Lot 105 & Lot 155 – north side of lot on Fisher Lane l. Lot 106 & Lot 151 – south side of lot on Fisher Lane m. Lot 150 – east side of lot on Shoreview Drive
n. Lot 151 & Lot 156 – south side of lot on Fisher Lane o. Lot 172 & Lot 177 – south side of lot on Tadpole Lane p. Lot 173 – north side of lot Tadpole Lane
q. Lot 183 & Lot 186 – south side of lot on Mallard Landing Lane r. Lot 184 – north side of lot on Mallard Landing Lane
s. Lot 139, Lot 187 & Lot 190 – south side of lot on Sandridge Lane t. Lot 140 & Lot 189 – north side of lot on Sandridge Lane u. Lot 242 & Lot 243 – south side of lot on Klamath Lane v. Lot 226, Lot 254 & Lot 255 – south side of lot on Quickwater Lane w. Lot 202 & Lot 228 – north side of lot on Quickwater Lane x. Lot 225 – east side of lot on Mariner Drive

Page 416 of 547 ends

5 y. Lot 223 – west side of lot on Mariner Drive
z. Lot 222 – south side of lot on Rocky River Lane
aa. Lot 218, Lot 219, & Lot 236 – north side of lot on Rocky River Lane bb. Lot 229 – east side of lot on Angler Drive
cc. Lot 230 – west side of lot on Angler Drive
dd. Lot 231 & Lot 281 – south side of lot on Rocky River Lane ee. Lot 16 & Lot 66 – east side of lot on Pigeon Drive
ff. Lot 74 – west side of lot on Pigeon Drive
gg. Lot 75 – west side of lot on Darwin Drive
hh. Lot 83 – east side of lot on Darwin Drive
ii. Lot 159 – north side of lot on Fisher Lane
jj. Lot 160 & Lot 201 – east side of lot on South Lake Drive kk. Lot 166 – west side of lot on South Lake Drive
ll. Lot 167 – west side of lot on Water View Drive
mm. Lot 178 – east side of lot Water View Drive
nn. Lot 194 – north side of lot on Sandridge Lane
oo. Lot 195 – west side of lot on South Lake Drive
pp. Lot 237 & Lot 248 – north side of lot on Klamath Lane qq. Lot 249 – north side of lot on Quickwater Lane

24. If during development activities, any wells are encountered, the property owner is expected to immediately notify the CalGEM construction site well review engineer in the Inland district office, and file for Division review an amended site plan with well casing diagrams.

25. On all corner lots and/or reverse corner lots within the tract, fences/walls shall not be located within the first 5 feet of the Public Utility Easement behind the street side yard and frontyard property lines. A note stating this must be included on all site plans during building permit review. The City will not permit walls nor fences to be built within the first five (5) feet of the PUE dedication on the side-yard of corner/reverse corner lots.

26. The Final Map for Tract No. 7461 must be submitted to the City of Bakersfield for review. and approval by the City Surveyor and City Engineer. The Final Map must include their respective signature and seal.

27. The City of Bakersfield Recreation and Parks Department must be contacted for any necessary landscape improvements within the existing median island located on 7th Standard Road. Contact: Fidel Gonzalez, 661-326-3268 or [email protected].

28. No permanent structure shall be built within a 10-foot radius of any existing wells as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map No. 7461.

29. The design of all houses proposed to be built by the Developer/Home Builder(s) within Tract 7461 must be in substantial conformance with the Mission Lakes Specific Plan Chapter 5: Design Guidelines.

30. The Developer/Home Builder of Tract 7461 shall use a variety of floor plans within the residential tract as required in the City of Shafter Zoning Ordinance Table 2.B (Residential Floor Plan and Elevations Guidelines). Floor plans and elevations will be subject to the

Page 417 of 547 ends

6 review and approval of the Shafter Planning and Building Departments. The Developer/Home Builder shall plot alternative floor plan types and/or elevation styles on contiguous lots within Tract 7461.

BUILDING

31. Prior to issuing a certificate of occupancy for any building, the building address(es) shall be permanently installed and be clearly visible from the street.

32. The Developer shall obtain a letter from Kern County Fire Department stating Kern County Fire’s approval of construction of 199 dwelling units without a secondary access. A copy of this letter shall be provided to the Building Department prior to the recording of the Final Map.

33. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall provide written confirmation from the SJVAPCD confirming that any and all applicable off-site mitigation fees for the subdivision have been paid in full.

34. No final inspection or issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall be approved for any lot until all required improvements have been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City.

35. Developer shall pay all development fees and impact fees adopted by the City in effect at the time of issuance of any building permitsCertificate of Occupancy. The Developer can also elect to pay traffic development and impact fees at the time of each building permit’s issuance.

36. Developer shall comply with the latest California Building Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Electrical Code, California Fire Code and all other applicable codes, ordinances, regulations, and development standards in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits.

37. Prior to issuance of each building permit for houses within Tract No. 7461, Developer shall submit a site plan to the City Planning Department for review and approval. The site plan shall reference the floor plan layout and building elevations, including exterior building materials and colors, for each of the single-family residences to be constructed within Tract No. 7461. The siting of each structure on the plans must comply with the applicable lot development standards of the latest Mission Lakes Specific Plan.

38. Private drives constructed of Portland cement concrete shall be constructed at a minimum width of 16 feet from the edge of public roadway pavement to the garage of each home.

39. A landscaping plan, including design of a permanent irrigation system, shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. Said approved landscape and irrigation plan shall be implemented prior to receiving a final inspection for any house constructed within the subdivision. All landscaping is subject to the requirements for landscaping contained herein these conditions and with City Standards. Landscaping shall include an irrigation system for both the front-yard and the street side-yard (where applicable) provided the street sideyard is not obscured from sight from an adjacent street by fencing, for each lot within the

Page 418 of 547 ends

7 subdivision. Landscaping shall comply with current State guidelines for residential landscaping.

40. Fiber Optic Installation for Dwelling Units: Owner agrees to install in each dwelling unit the following fiber optic requirements:
a. Install a Dedicated City Fiber Enclosure adjacent to the other utility enclosures or a Common Communication Enclosure (collectively “Utility Enclosure”) for the proposed communications utilities (phone, cable, fiber, etc.). The enclosure type shall be Benner-Nawman 14326W-UL or as approved by the City. The Utility Enclosure may face the garage exterior or interior and shall include one 120-volt, 15-amp convenience receptacle inside the enclosure mounted on either side of the wall. A surge-protected receptacle must be installed or verification that an equivalent surge protection device (SPD) has been installed as an integral part of the service equipment or located immediately adjacent to the service equipment to be in accordance with article 230.67 of the California Electrical Code.
b. Install a wireless-transparent Structured Media Enclosure (“Media Enclosure”), such as models: Legrand 30” ENP3050, Legrand 42” ENP4250, Leviton 30” 49605-30W, Primex Verge 30” P3000, 42” Primex Verge P4200, or as approved by the City. The Media Enclosure shall be installed in the wall of a master bedroom closet or a laundry room furthest from the water supply and maintain a minimum 48-inch horizontal clearance between and 24-inch clearance above any metallic appliances or accessories.

The Media Enclosure shall include one 120-volt, 15-amp convenience receptacle located inside the enclosure.
c. Install a conduit pathway from the Utility Enclosure to the Media Enclosure with a minimum of one (1) 1-inch diameter non-metallic, flexible conduit which shall maintain a minimum 36-inch bend radius and protrude a minimum of 6-inches into the enclosures. The conduit shall be marked with orange Tyvek or plastic tags, labeled “City Fiber Use Only”, 661-746-5000”, tie wrapped to the conduit in plain view within the enclosures.
d. Install a continuous conduit without breaks or couplings from the existing City Fiber Distribution Enclosure located in the right-of-way (“Distribution Enclosure”) to the bottom side of the Utility Enclosure. The conduit shall be installed a minimum of 36- inches below grade, protrude a minimum of 12-inches into the Utility Enclosure, be orange in color, and be factory labeled “City of Shafter 661-746-5000”. If the conduit does not have an integrated tracer wire, a continuous external #12 AWG solidconductor tracer wire with high-density polyethylene insulation rated for direct burial shall be installed along with the conduit leaving a minimum 15-feet of slack coiled in the Distribution Enclosure and 3-feet of slack coiled in the Utility Enclosure. The conduit and tracer wire shall be inspected by a City of Shafter representative before shading and backfilling.
i. After backfilling, polyester cable pulling tape (Muletape), or equivalent, shall be installed in all conduit paths between the Distribution Enclosure and the Utility Enclosure. Mule tape shall be slack (no tension) and fastened to the plug or cap.

Page 419 of 547 ends

8 ii. Couplings shall be used to repair damaged or short-length conduit only if approved by the City. Conduit couplings shall be an air-tight, water-tight, pushon compression fitting approved by the City. Tracer wire couplings shall be airtight, water-tight, twist on or compression connector approved by the City.

Coupling integrity shall be inspected by a City of Shafter representative. e. Category 6 Unshielded Twisted Pair (CAT 6 UTP) cable (or as approved by the City) shall be installed according to industry standards and the requirements below, and shall not be pinched, stapled, bent sharply, or crossing any sharp, unprotected edges:
i. Install a minimum of two (2) cables from the Utility Enclosure to the Media Enclosure.

ENGINEERING

41. Developer shall remove and replace any existing public or private improvements that may become damaged during any phase of construction, as required by the City Engineer. The contractor working within the public right-of-way shall obtain an encroachment permit from the City Engineer prior to commencing any such work.

42. Developer shall relocate and/or install all necessary infrastructure to provide utilities to the proposed project.

43. A ten (10) foot public utility easement, as shown on the tentative map, shall be provided in the front of all lots and on the street side of all corner lots/reverse corner lots as requested by the utility companies and the City Engineer. Easements shall be granted with the final map. Easements must also be shown on individual site plans during building permit application review.

44. Pedestrian easements shall be provided wherever sidewalks and other public walking paths are to be constructed outside the proposed public rights-of-way. The minimum width of the pedestrian easements shall be one (1) foot.

45. Easements to be given to the City or any other public utility agency for sewer, water, storm drain, electrical, or any other utility or similar purpose shall not cross private property without prior approval of the City Engineer.

46. Any above-ground utility cabinets or facilities to be located within the road right-of-way or public utility easement shall be permitted only upon approval by the City Engineer. Such approval will be made in writing, upon written request of the applicant and/or the affected utility company.

47. Any obstructions including utilities, irrigation lines, etc., shall be removed and/or relocated, if necessary, at the expense of the Developer.

48. No final inspection shall be approved until all required improvements have been completed by the applicant and accepted by the City of Shafter.

49. All new utilities shall be underground service.

Page 420 of 547 ends

9 50. During construction, vehicular access points shall be covered with decomposed granite, road oil, or some other treatment acceptable to the City Engineer, to prevent generation of dust during periods of vehicular activity and/or windy conditions and tracking of mud and dirt on public roadways.

51. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on any lot of Tract No. 7461, all required improvements shall be completed and accepted by the City of Shafter. Required improvements shall be those improvements necessary to provide adequate City Services to the subject lot as determined by the City Engineer.

52. All improvements shall be complete within one (1) year from the date of filing of the final map for the development unless a time extension is granted by the City Engineer. The timing of improvements shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.

53. Type and location of centralized mail delivery units shall be determined by the postal service. If the postal service requires special easements for the placement of the delivery units, then said easements shall be shown on the final map.

54. All road, landscaping, trail, sidewalk, block wall, and paseo improvements, required by and consistent with Tract No. 7461 and the Mission Lakes Specific Plan, shall be constructed by the Developer and approved by the City of Shafter prior to recordation of the final map or shall be included as a public improvement in the subdivision improvement agreement. Wall plans, materials, and dimensions shall be consistent with the requirements of the Mission Lakes Specific Plan and Tentative Tract No. 7461 and shall be approved by the City of Shafter prior to construction. The timing of improvements shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.

55. Developer shall place the entire subdivision within a new or add to an existing Community Facilities District prior to recordation of the final map and prior to acceptance of improvements by the City of Shafter. The maintenance district shall be set-up to cover the cost of street lighting, drainage basin maintenance, landscaping maintenance, and/or park maintenance, as well as all administrative costs associated with the City of Shafter’s management of the District.
a. The Developer shall be required to cover the cost of street lighting, maintain all landscaping, park maintenance, including the replacement of any trees or shrubs that do not survive, within public right-of-way and landscape easements for a period of one (1) year after final inspection of the landscape improvements, or until such time as the maintenance district is formed, whichever shall occur last. b. Developer shall be fully responsible for the formation, and formation cost of the Community Facilities District, as directed by the City Engineer. c. Developer shall be fully responsible for paying the cost of water for all landscaping and electricity for the streetlights until such time as the maintenance district is formed.

Page 421 of 547 ends

10 56. Engineered plans and building permits are required for all block walls greater than 6 feet in height.

57. Developer shall design and install a system of conduits, terminal enclosures, distribution enclosures, splice enclosures, connection points, and hand holes for a fiber optic network to each buildable lot within the development. Design and material specifications are available from the City of Shafter. Plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Shafter, prior to recordation of the final map, showing the proposed utility trench and all appurtenant hardware. The design shall include the following minimum specifications:
a. A combination of fiber optic conduits shall minimally include 4” SDR-11 HDPE, 2” SDR-11 HDPE, 1.25” SDR-11 HDPE, and 7-Way bundled HPDE innerduct with attached tracer wire. Fiber optic conduits may be joint-trenched with other utility company pipes and/or conduits.
b. All underground fiber optic conduits, innerduct bundles, etc. shall be factory-labeled “City of Shafter 661-746-5000”. Conduits shall be identified by a permanent marking, with the address number of the residence they serve, within the distribution enclosures.
c. All underground fiber optic conduit paths shall have tracer wire. If the conduit does not have an integrated tracer wire, a continuous external #12 AWG solid-conductor tracer wire with high-density polyethylene insulation rated for direct burial shall be installed along with the conduit leaving a minimum 15-feet of slack coiled in the endpoint enclosures.
d. The ends of all fiber optic conduits and innerducts shall be plugged or capped to prevent dirt, debris, or foreign objects from entering. e. After backfilling, all conduits shall be checked for obstructions, and re-excavated and repaired or replaced as required. All conduits ½-inch or larger shall require polyester cable pulling tape (Muletape) or equivalent installed. Polyester cable pulling tape (Muletape) shall be slack (no tension) and fastened to the plug or cap. Innerducts shall be mandrel tested and are subject to inspection by a City of Shafter representative.
f. A combination of underground utility enclosures shall minimally include 36”W x 60”L x 36”D polymer concrete enclosures with dual torsion covers, 36”W x 36”L x 24-36”D and 24”W x 36”L x 24-36”D High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) enclosures.
g. All underground utility enclosures shall be factory-stamped “City Fiber”.

58. Prior to construction, all improvement plans and landscaping plans shall be approved by the City of Shafter.

59. The side-yard fences constructed along local streets shall consist of a masonry block retaining wall, or other material as approved by the City Engineer, topped with a wooden fence. Sufficient area behind the sidewalk shall be provided to accommodate the installation of community mailboxes, where required by the US Postal Service.

60. The final subdivision map proposed for recordation shall be in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map or any approved alterations thereafter.

Page 422 of 547 ends

Shafter City CouncilJune 2, 2026

Shafter City Council
June 2, 2026