detention basins. The original project also included a landscape plan in compliance with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO) under SBMC Chapter 17.56 and proposed landscaping throughout the site, including a California Pepper tree and a variety of palm and citrus trees.
After City Council approval of the DRP, the Applicant obtained associated construction permits, including building and grading permits. The building permit (B19-0455) for the replacement residence passed final inspection and received occupancy in October of 2021. Prior to final inspection of the building permit, Staff approved two revisions to modify locations of the approved pool and shade structure located in the rear yard. These changes were deemed to be in substantial conformance with the approved DRP. While the building permit for the replacement single-family residence has been completed, the DRP has not been “finaled” as other site work managed under the grading permit and conditioned by the DRP, has not been completed.
During the course of construction, it became apparent to Staff that other modifications were underway that would require revisions to the grading permit and landscape plan and City Council approval of a Modification to the DRP. These changes consisted of the amount of grading and the proposed landscaping. The Applicant was directed to either revert to be within substantial conformance of the approved DRP or pursue City Council approval of a Modification.
The DRP Modification before City Council consists of work which has, for the most part, been completed. The grading permit (SBGR-390) is nearly ready for final inspection and the Applicant has alerted Staff that the landscape installation is complete. Revised grading and landscape plans are included in Attachment 3. The Applicant’s explanation of changes is included in Attachment 4. The modifications, which require consideration by the City Council under the Development Review Permit, are listed below:
• An 80 cubic-yard reduction in the amount of cut/excavation and a 310 cubicyard increase in fill associated with the project, which is generally associated with re-grading the existing slope in the front yard and creating a parking area in the southeast corner of the property; and • A new landscape planting plan, including a perimeter hedge and a variety of new trees throughout the site.
All DRP approvals include a condition requiring construction permits to be in “substantial conformance” with the plans approved by the City Council. It is expected that grading quantities could change during the preparation of a final grading plan or during conduction. Typically, the threshold for substantial conformance of a DRP is a variation in grading quantity less than 100 cubic yards. When changes in grading exceed 100 cubic yards, a DRP Modification is required.
Additionally, landscape planting plans change during the course of construction due to associated site planning changes, plant availability, and the Applicant’s preference. Minor changes to landscape plans such as size and location of planters or swapping species of the same maximum height can be approved ministerially by Staff. However, changes in June 22, 2022
MOD22-003, Fomon – 4250 North Lane
landscape heights, such as addition or changes to trees and hedges, require City Council approval of a DRP Modification.
Development Review Permit Compliance (SBMC Section 17.68.40):
Pursuant to SBMC Section 17.68.040(L), an amendment (modification) to an existing DRP may be requested and shall follow the same procedures as the DRP. The Council may approve, or conditionally approve, a Modification to a DRP only if all of the findings listed below can be made. Resolution 2022-074 provides the full discussion of the findings.
1. The proposed development is consistent with the general plan and all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance including special regulations, overlay zones, and specific plans.
2. The proposed development complies with the development review criteria.
3. All required permits and approvals issued by the city, including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.
4. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.
The following is a list of the development review criteria topics set forth in SBMC Section
17.68.040(F):
1. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses
2. Building and Structure Placement
3. Landscaping
4. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking, and Storage Areas
5. Grading
6. Lighting
7. Usable Open Space
The following is a discussion of the applicable development review criteria (3-Landscape and 5-Grading) as they relate to the modifications proposed.
Landscape:
The project is subject to the current water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. A Landscape Documentation Package is required for new development projects with an aggregate landscape equal to or greater than 500 square feet requiring a building permit, plan check or development review.
June 22, 2022
MOD22-003, Fomon – 4250 North Lane
The City Council approved the original conceptual landscape plan and the Applicant prepared a construction landscape plan in substantial conformance with City Council’s approval, which was reviewed and approved by the City’s third-party landscape consultant. The construction landscape plan was approved with the other construction permits.
During the course of construction, the Applicant modified the landscaping to the extent that a Modification of the DRP is required. The revised construction landscape plan has been reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect and found to be in compliance with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO). The City Council could find the revised landscape plan includes replacement vegetation and landscaping that is consistent with the surrounding area, that service areas of the site are property screened, and that trees and large plantings would not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.
The standard condition still applies that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water-conserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.
Grading:
The revised project proposes a reduction in the proposed cut by 80 cubic yards (from 1,050 to 970 cubic yards) and an increase in the proposed fill by 310 cubic yards (from 1,980 to 2,290 cubic yards). The revised grading quantities would result in a 390 cubicyard increase in the amount of import (930 to 1,320 cubic yards) and a 230 cubic-yard increase in the amount of aggregate grading (from 4,480 to 4,710 cubic yards).
The grading associated with the project was originally proposed to modify the existing driveway to meet fire apparatus and vehicular access to the upper building pad from North Lane, to lower and even out the existing building pad, and to provide for two stormwater detention basins. The modified grading would re-grade the existing slope in the front yard and create a parking area in the southeast corner of the property. A condition has been recommended that the parking area shall not be utilized as a recreational court in the future as approximately half of the pad is located in the front yard setback.
The City Council could find that the natural topography of the property has been preserved to the extent feasible with the project and that the proposed grading would blend with the existing surrounding terrain. The existing slope would be regraded and vegetated in order to increase stability of the slope.
In conclusion, the proposed project, as conditioned, could be found to be consistent with the Zoning regulations and the General Plan. Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the project in the attached Resolution 2022-074 for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report. The Applicant shall provide for and adhere to the conditions of the original project approval in Resolution 2019-128. The Applicant is also required to provide for and adhere to the conditions for the proposed modification that have been incorporated into the attached Resolution 2022-074.
June 22, 2022
MOD22-003, Fomon – 4250 North Lane
The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the Public Hearing process. If the Council determines the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
Notice of the City Council Public Hearing was published in the San Diego Union Tribune more than 10 days prior to the public hearing. The same public notice was mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project site, more than 10 days prior to the planned public hearing date of June 22, 2022. Staff has not received any emails, letters or calls in support or opposition of the proposed modification.
CEQA COMPLIANCE:
Categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
• Approve the proposed modification by adopting Resolution 2022-074; • Approve modification by adopting Resolution 2022-074 with changes as deemed appropriate by City Council; or,
• Deny the request to amend the project and direct Staff to bring back a Resolution of Denial to a later City Council meeting date.
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed project meets the minimum objective requirements under the SBMC, is consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings to approve a Modification to the approved DRP. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the public hearing, Report Council disclosures, Receive public testimony, Close the public hearing.
2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2022-074 conditionally approving a Modification to the approved DRP, for a replacement single-family residence at 4250 North Lane, Solana Beach.
June 22, 2022
MOD22-003, Fomon – 4250 North Lane
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:
1. Resolution 2022-074 to Approve the DRP Mod
2. Approved Resolution 2019-128 for the Original DRP
3. Revised Grading and Landscape Plans
4. Letter from Applicant
RESOLUTION 2022-074
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT TO MODIFY
THE GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AT 4250 NORTH
LANE, SOLANA BEACH
APPLICANT: BRAD FOMON
CASE NO.: MOD22-003
WHEREAS, Brad Fomon (hereinafter referred to as “Applicant”) has submitted a request for modification to the original project approval of a Development Review Permit (DRP) for construction of a replacement single-family residence located at 4250 North Lane (Case No. 17-19-01 and Resolution No. 2019-128), pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning), of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the Applicant requested the approval of a modification to the grading and landscape plans to allow an 80 cubic-yard reduction in the amount of cut/excavation and a 310 cubic-yard increase in fill associated with the project and a new landscape planting plan including a perimeter hedge and a variety of new trees throughout the site; and
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the request for modifications; and
WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of SBMC
17.72.030 of the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the request for a modification; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found that the project is exempt from the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which exempts minor modifications to existing facilities; and WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. That the request to modify the grading and landscape plans is conditionally approved based on the following Findings, and all terms and conditions of Resolution 2019-128 are in effect along with the following conditions applicable to the proposed modification:
Resolution 2022-074
MOD22-003 4250 North Ln.
Fomon Residence
3. FINDINGS:
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permits) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the Council can make the required findings to approve a modification with specific attention to the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section
17.68.040.F and required under Development Review Permit Finding Number One (17.68.040.H.1):
3) Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.
The project is subject to the current water efficient landscaping regulations of SBMC Chapter 17.56. A Landscape Documentation Package is required for new development projects with an aggregate landscape equal to or greater than 500 square feet requiring a building permit, plan check or development review.
The City Council approved the original conceptual landscape plan and the Applicant prepared a construction landscape plan in substantial conformance with City Council’s approval, which was reviewed and approved by the City’s third-party landscape consultant.
The construction landscape plan was approved with the other construction permits.
During the course of construction, the Applicant modified the landscaping to the extent that a Modification of the DRP was required.
The revised construction landscape plan has been reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect and found to be in compliance with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (WELO). The City Council finds the revised landscape plan includes replacement vegetation and landscaping that is consistent with the surrounding area, that service areas of the site are property screened, and that trees and large plantings would not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.
The standard condition still applies that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water-conserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.
5) Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in Resolution 2022-074
MOD22-003 4250 North Ln.
Fomon Residence
connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.
The revised project proposes a reduction in the proposed cut by 80 cubic yards (from 1,050 to 970 cubic yards) and an increase in the proposed fill by 310 cubic yards (from 1,980 to 2,290 cubic yards).
The revised grading quantities would result in a 390 cubic-yard increase in the amount of import (930 to 1,320 cubic yards) and a 230 cubic-yard increase in the amount of aggregate grading (from 4,480 to 4,710 cubic yards).
The grading associated with the project was originally proposed to modify the existing driveway to meet fire apparatus and vehicular access to the upper building pad from North Lane, to lower and even out the existing building pad, and to provide for two stormwater detention basins. The modified grading would re-grade the existing slope in the front yard and create a parking area in the southeast corner of the property. A condition has been added that the parking area shall not be utilized as a recreational court in the future as approximately half of the pad is located in the front yard setback.
The City Council could find that the natural topography of the property has been preserved to the extent feasible with the project and that the proposed grading would blend with the existing surrounding terrain.
The existing slope would be regraded and vegetated in order to increase stability of the slope.
4. CONDITIONS: Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicant shall provide for and adhere to the conditions of the original project approval of Resolution 2019-128 and the following condition.
A. Community Development Department Conditions:
I. Grading and landscape plans must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City Council on June 22, 2022 and located in the project file dated June 15, 2022.
II. The pad in the southeast corner of the lot shall not be utilized for recreational activities in the future.
5. ENFORCEMENT: Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the above-mentioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.16 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.
Resolution 2022-074
MOD22-003 4250 North Ln.
Fomon Residence
6. EXPIRATION: The approval of the modification for the project will expire 24 months from the date of this approval, unless the Applicant has obtained building permits and have commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council.
7. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT: The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, the Applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicant.
NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this Resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this Resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the Resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this Resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 22nd day of June 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Resolution 2022-074
MOD22-003 4250 North Ln.
Fomon Residence
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2019-128
- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT FOR THE
DEMOLITION OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE,
CONSTRUCTION OF A REPLACEMENT SINGLE-STORY,
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED THREECAR GARAGE, AND PERFORM ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4250
NORTH LANE, SOLANA BEACH
APPLICANT: BRADFOMON
CASE NO.: 17-19-01 DRP
WHEREAS, Brad Fomon (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant"), has submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and
WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on September 25, 2019, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:
I. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
II. That the request for a DRP to demolish a single-family residence, construct a replacement single-story, single-family residence with an attached three-car garage, and perform associated site improvements at 4250 North Lane, is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:
Ill. FINDINGS
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:
Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Fomon
I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.
General Plan Consistency: The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan designation of Estate Residential (ER) which allows for single-family estate residential development with a maximum density of 1 dwelling unit per acre. The development is also consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.
Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SSMC 17.20.030 and
17.48.040), which delineates maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR), Permitted Uses and Structures (SBMC Section 17.20.020) which provides for uses of the property for a single-family residence. Further, the project adheres to all property development regulations established for the ER Zone and cited by SSMC Section 17.020.030.
The project is consistent with the provisions for minimum yard dimensions (i.e., setbacks) and the maximum allowable Floor Area (FAR), maximum building height, and parking requirements.
II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section
17. 68. 040. F:
a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses: The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and where feasible, complimentary to existing and potential development in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Site planning on the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects, as well as protection of the property from adverse surrounding influences.
The property is located within the ER Zone. Properties to the north, south and west are also located within the ER Zone and developed with a mixture of one- and two-story single-family estate residences. The property is located on the City's eastern boundary and the properties immediately to the east are located within the County of San Diego's jurisdiction and the community of Rancho Santa Fe.
Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Farnan
The project, as designed, is consistent with the permitted uses for the ER Zone as described in SBMC Sections 17.20.010 and 17 .12.020. The property is designated Estate Residential in the General Plan and intended for single-family estate residences developed at a maximum density of one dwelling units per acre.
The proposed development could be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential
neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.
The property is not located within any of the City's Specific Plan or Overlay Zone areas; however, it is located within the Coastal Zone. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant would be required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption from the California Coastal Commission prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhances their intended use.
The Applicant proposes to construct a replacement single-story, single-family residence with an attached three-car garage and perform associated improvements including grading,
hardscaping, landscaping, and construction of a pool, spa, detached covered patio, and outdoor kitchen. The project will maintain the general site configuration of the existing development with the residence located on the existing upper building pad and driveway access taken along the southern side of the property from the lower private drive (North Lane).
The 5,042 square-foot single-story residence will consist of: an open-concept kitchen, living room, breakfast nook, and dining room; a utility room, a pantry, a guest/pool full bathroom; an office; a play room; four bedrooms, each with on-suite full bathrooms and walk-in closets; and a master suite. The project will include a 1 , 134 square-foot, attached three-car garage and a covered patio that would partially (95 square feet) contribute to the total floor area of the project. The subtotal of the proposed floor area for the project will be 6,271 square feet.
The SBMC parking regulations require two off-street parking spaces per single-family residence. The Code indicates that when required spaces are provided in a garage, 200 square feet of floor area is exempted for each required space. The site is required to provide two parking spaces; therefore, the project is Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Fomon
SBMC Section 17.52.040 and the Off-Street Parking Design Manual (OSPDM) require two (2) parking spaces for a singlefamily residence. The Applicant is proposing to construct an attached, three-car garage accessed by a redesigned driveway on the southern side of the property. SBMC Section 17.08.030 indicates that required parking up to 200 square feet per parking space provided in a garage is exempt from the floor area calculation. The proposed garage will provide three 9 foot by 19 foot parking spaces that are clear of obstruction. Two spaces are required, therefore, 400 square feet of garage area is exempt from the project's floor area calculation.
e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.
The project proposes grading in the amounts of 1,050 cubic yards of cut, 1 ,980 cubic yards of fill, 930 cubic yards of import, and 1,450 cubic yards of remedial grading. Grading is proposed to modify the existing driveway to meet fire apparatus and vehicular access to the upper building pad from North Lane, to lower and even out the existing building pad, and to provide for two stormwater detention basins.
f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.
All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding areas per SBMC 17.60.060 (Exterior Lighting Regulations).
Conditions of project approval include that all new exterior lighting fixtures comply with the City-Wide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060); that all light fixtures shall be shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.
g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.
Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Farnan
afforded a 400 square-foot exemption. With the exemption, the total proposed floor area will be 5,871 square feet, which is 9,794 square feet below the maximum allowable floor area for the 74,436 square-foot lot. The maximum floor area calculation for this project is as follows:
0.60 for first 5,000 tt2
0.30 for 5,000 to 20,000 ft2
0.15 for anything over 20,000 ft2
Maximum Allowable Floor Area:
3,000 ft2
4,500 ft2
8,165 ft2
15,665 ft2
The proposed project, as designed, meets the minimum required setbacks and is below the maximum allowable floor area for the property.
c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.
The project is subject to the current water efficient landscaping regulations of SSMC Chapter 17 .56. A Landscape
Documentation Package is required for new development
projects with an aggregate landscape equal to or greater than 500 square feet requiring a building permit, plan check or development review. The Applicant provided a conceptual landscape plan that has been reviewed by the City's third-party landscape architect, who has recommended approval. The
Applicant will be required to submit detailed construction landscape drawings that will be reviewed by the City's third-party landscape architect for conformance with the conceptual plan. In addition, the City's third-party landscape architect will perform inspections during the construction phase of the project. A separate condition has been added to require that native or drought-tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and waterconserving irrigation systems are required to be incorporated into the landscaping to the extent feasible.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways.
Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view, to the extent feasible, by existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.
Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Fomon
The project consists of the construction of a replacement singlestory, single-family residence with an attached garage on a developed residential lot, therefore, usable open space and recreational, facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section 17.20.040. As a condition of
approval, the Applicant will be required to pay the City's Park Development Impact Fee.
Ill. All required permits and approvals including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.
All required permits are being processed concurrently with the Development Review Permit.
IV. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicant obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.
The Applicant is required to obtain approval from the California Coastal Commission prior to issuance of Building and Grading Permits.
B. In accordance with Section 17.63.040 (Structure Development Permit) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:
The proposed structure will not exceed 16 feet in height above the preexisting grade. Therefore, the Applicant was not required to obtain a Structure Development Permit. The project plans show the maximum structure height would be 15.92 feet measured above the proposed grade or 332.9 feet above MSL.
As a condition of approval, a height certificate prepared by a licensed land surveyor will be required prior to the framing inspection certifying that the structure would not exceed 16 feet as measured from the pre-existing grade.
IV. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicant shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:
A. Community Development Department Conditions:
I. The Applicant shall pay required Public Facilities, Fire Mitigation, Park Development and Public Use Facilities Impact Fees, as established by Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Farnan
SSMC Chapter 17.72.020, Chapter 15.60, Chapter 15.65, Chapter
15.66, and Resolutions 1987-36 and 2018-147.
II. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the architectural plans presented to the City Council on September 25, 2019, and located in the project file with a submittal date of September 17, 2019.
Ill. Prior to requesting a framing inspection, the Applicant shall submit a height certification, signed by a licensed land surveyor, certifying that the building envelope is in conformance with the plans as approved by the City Council on September 25, 2019 and the structure does not exceed 16 feet from the pre-existing grade.
IV. Any proposed onsite fences, walls and retaining walls and any proposed railing located on top, or any combination thereof, shall comply with applicable regulations of SSMC Section 17.20.040 and
17.60.070 (Fences and Walls).
V. The Applicant shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
VI. The Applicant shall submit detailed construction landscape drawings that will be reviewed by the City's third-party landscape architect and shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual plan presented to the City Council on September 25, 2019. In addition, the City's thirdparty landscape architect will perform a final inspection to verify substantial conformance onsite prior to final completion of construction.
VI I. Native or drought tolerant and non-invasive plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into any proposed landscaping and compatible with the surrounding area to the extent feasible. ·
VI 11. All new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the Citywide lighting regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060).
All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding area.
IX. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all times when feasible. If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicant shall ensure construction vehicles are Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Farnan
parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on the street and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.
X. The Applicant shall connect to temporary electrical service as soon as feasible to the satisfaction of the City.
B. Fire Department Conditions:
I. GATES: All gates or other structures or devices, which could obstruct fire access roadways or otherwise hinder emergency operations, are prohibited unless they meet standards approved by the Fire Department. An approved emergency key-operated switch and/or an approved emergency traffic control-activating strobe light sensor shall be installed per Solana Beach Fire Department standards.
II. OBSTRUCTION OF ROADWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION: All
roadways shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width during construction and maintained free and clear, including the parking of vehicles, in accordance with the California Fire Code and the Solana Beach Fire Department.
Ill. FIRE HYDRANTS AND FIRE FLOWS: The Applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Solana Beach Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available.
Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. Multi-family residential or industrial fire hydrants shall have two (2) 4" inch and two (2) 2 ½" inch NST outlets. Residential fire hydrants shall have one (1) 4" inch NST outlet, and one (1) 2 ½" inch NST outlets.
• Show the location of nearest fire hydrant.
IV. FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES/FIRE BREAKS: The Applicant shall provide and maintain fire/fuel breaks to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department. Fire/fuel breaks size and composition shall be determined by the Fire Department and shown on the improvement /grading plans and final map and building plans.
V. ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers
and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background, and shall meet the following minimum standards as to size: 4" high with a ½" inch stroke width for residential buildings, 8" high with a ½" stroke for commercial and multi-family residential buildings, 12" high with a 1" Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Fomon
stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to commercial centers.
VI. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM-ONE AND TWO FAMILY
DWELLINGS: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
VII. CLASS "A" ROOF: All structures shall be provided with a Class "A" Roof covering to the satisfaction of the Solana Beach Fire Department.
C. Engineering Department Conditions:
I. Letters of permission to grade shall be obtained from adjoining property owners for grading that is within three feet of the property line or on adjacent properties. Cut and fill slopes shall be set back from site boundaries and buildings shall be set back from cut or fill slopes in accordance with SBMC 15.40.140.
II. The Applicant shall prepare a City of Solana Beach Stormwater Checklist for Determination of Project Category to address potential water quality impacts to ensure that pollutants and runoff from this development are reduced to the maximum extent practicable.
Ill. Complete to the satisfaction of the City Engineer all grading, paving, public improvements, landscaping, and drainage improvements.
IV. Underground all new utility services including, but not limited to, electrical and telephone.
V. All construction demolition materials shall be recycled according to the City's Construction and Demolition recycling program and an approved Waste Management Plan shall be submitted.
VI. Construction fencing shall be located on the subject property unless the Applicant has obtained an Encroachment Permit in accordance with chapter 11 .20 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code which allows otherwise.
VII. It is recommended that the existing and proposed driveway is realigned to connect to North Lane at a perpendicular configuration.
GRADING
Resolution 2019-128
17-19~01 DRP Fomon
VIII. Obtain a Grading Permit in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code. Conditions prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. The grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. On-site grading design and construction shall be in accordance with Chapter
15.40 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code.
b. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a Registered Soils Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. All necessary measures shall be taken and implemented to assure slope stability, erosion control and soil integrity. The grading plan shall incorporate all recommendations contained in the soils report.
c. Provide a Drainage Report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. This report shall address the design for detention basin and corresponding outflow system to ensure the rate of runoff for the proposed development is at or below that of pre-existing condition. All recommendations of this report shall be
incorporated into the Preliminary Grading Plan. A detention basin easement(s) shall be recorded for maintenance of the detention basins by the property owner(s) in perpetuity, prior to Final Inspection of the Building Permit.
d. All retaining walls and drainage structures shall be shown.
Retaining walls shown on the grading plan shall conform to the San Diego Regional Standards or be designed by a licensed civil engineer. Engineering calculations for all designed walls with a surcharge and nonstandard walls shall be submitted at grading plan check. Retaining walls may not exceed the allowable height within the property line setback as determined by the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code. Contact the Community
Development Department for further information.
e.1. The Applicant is responsible to protect the adjacent properties during construction. If any grading, other types of construction or access is anticipated beyond the property lines, the Applicant shall obtain a letter of permission from the adjoining property owners. All required letters of permission shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to the anticipated work.
e.2. Cut and fill slopes shall be set back from site boundaries and buildings shall be set back from cut or fill slopes in accordance Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Fomon
with SBMC 15.40.140 and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
f. Pay grading plan check fee in accordance with the current Engineering Fee Schedule at initial grading plan submittal.
Inspection fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the Grading Permit.
g. Obtain and submit grading security in a form prescribed by the City Engineer.
h. Obtain a Haul Permit for import / export of soil. The Applicant shall transport all excavated material to a legal disposal site. i. Submit certification from the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer that all public or private drainage facilities and finished grades are functioning and are installed in accordance with the approved plans. This shall be accomplished by the Engineer of Record incorporating as-built conditions on the Mylar grading plans and obtaining signatures of the Engineer of Record and the Soils Engineer certifying the as-built conditions.
j. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan shall be prepared. Best management practices shall be developed and implemented to manage storm water and non-storm water
discharges from the site at all times during excavation and grading activities. Erosion prevention shall be emphasized as the most important measure for keeping sediment on site during excavation and grading activities. Sediment controls shall be used as a supplement to erosion prevention for keeping sediment on site.
k. Show all proposed on-site private drainage facilities intended to discharge water run-off. Elements of this design shall include a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis verifying the adequacy of the facilities and identify any easements or structures required to properly convey the drainage. The construction of drainage structures shall comply with the standards set forth by the San Diego Regional Standard Drawings.
I. Post Construction Best Management Practices meeting City and RWQCB Order No. R9-2013-001 requirements shall be
implemented in the drainage design.
m. No increased cross lot drainage shall be allowed.
V. ENFORCEMENT
Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRP Farnan
Pursuant to SSMC 17.72.120(8) failure to satisfy any and all of the abovementioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SSMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.
VI. EXPIRATION
The Development Review Permit and Structure Development Permit for the project will expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicant has obtained building permits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council according to SSMC 17. 72.110.
VII. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
II
II
II
The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.
In the event of such election, the Applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter.
However, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicant.
Resolution 2019-128
17-19-01 DRPFomon
NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 25th day of September, 2019, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmembers - Zito, Edson, Hegenauer, Becker, Harless Councilmembers - None
Councilmembers - None
Councilmembers - None
DAVID A. ZITO, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(
RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SS.
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
I, ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 2019-128 approving a development review permit at 4250 North Lane, Applicant: Brad Fomon, Case 17-19-01 as duly passed and adopted at a Regular Solana Beach City Council meeting held on the 25th day of September, 2019. The original is on file in the City Clerk's Office.
CERTIFICATION DATE: Oci-k .Iv , 2019
)>
-f
-f
)>
("')
J:
s:
m
z
-f
c..,
DEMOLITION
TO DISTN'ICE TO
LMYUGIIT P£R
SOIL'S fJ/GIHITR
RfCOIIMEHO.IOOl/5
0 EXISTING RfSIDEHCE TO Bf R6KNED BY
SEPARATE PfRIITT 0 EXISTING POOL AND SPA TO Bf REMCM:D
0 EXISTING DRl\'Ell'AY TO Bf R£llOVtD
0 EXISTJNG SIT<i RfTAINING WALLS TO
Bf REI/OV£D
0 EXISTING HAl?OSCAPE TO Bf RDIOVfD
CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
CD =Ai2~:C7io ~5~GR_gu-·
@ EARTHEN 8ERtJ P£R DET. I/ SHm J
Q) ':tir!RAJTJON 8.'SIN P£R DITAIL J AND JA/
G) ~ [NfRG'r DISSIPATOR 5'X5', DU. 2/
@ CONCRfTE HOOWAU. P£R DU. 5/ SHffi J
@ 4. ARfA DRAIN NOS 80X OR EOUI>'.
(]) 4 • SDR-J5 STORM DRAIN P/Pf AT 2% MIN.
@ 12• SQ DRAIN /I/LIT NOS BOX OR EOUI>'.
@ 6" SDR- J5 STORII DRAIN PfPE AT 2% MIN.
@ RET WALL 5'-4" FT MAX HEJGIIT P£R
SDRSD C-4, SIT SECTION B- B/ SHT 2
A 4. STORM DRAIN CWJiOIJT P£R DU
\!JI J/ SHT J
@ 12" WIDE 1RO/CH DRAIN NOS OR EQUIV.
@ ~ BROW DffCH P£R DETAIL 4/
@ g~ ~-r;~ ~~~-
__J
SQG<t£ CONDUCTOR Cl,EAR,4NC£ NOTE·
l . \IERTICAL DISTANCE FROM FINISH GROUND TO THC TENSK!II OOH VARIES: I/IN/MUM 6 FT MAXIIIUM 26 FT (WrTHIN
ARfA OF WORK). 2. \IERTICAL DISTANCE FROM FINISH GROUND TO THC rHERGUED CONDUCTORS VAR1£5: MINIIIUII I 7 FT llAXIMUII 27 FT (WrTHIN ARfA OF ll'ORK).
HOTE: ;iKJVE MEASUIIOIEHTS GfV£H AT THC HORTH EDGE OF
THE 5/JGif E.ASfl/00. DR1',£WAY/\,fll/Ci£ ACCESS ARfA IS OUTS/OE OF THE 5/JGif EASEJ,100. SIT REFER£JIC£ 5/JGif CONDITIONS ON SHEET J.
-
;(SF) w•w
74,470
GRADING PLAN
0 20 40
ti 1li.l•==jl ~--•~I Feet SCALE: 1·-20·-o·
0+00.00
CITY APPROVED CHANGES Al'P'D DATE RECOMMENDED FOR APPR<N/'J..
I
I
""
~
\
~ '<!-~"'
0 20 40
ti 1•~==11 ••••~I Feet SC.41£: 1·- 20·-o·
\ \
\
fi 10,.'t ',,\
~!Po~· \ '
\
SQUBCf CQt(T1fO( ftNPg;
PREVENTION OF ILUCTT DISCHARGES INTO "54
LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SETBACKS
E.AS£MOO
(JI 7y- - _;(JI 7) EXIST1/IG CONTOUR
__.-JJ5_/
~
= =
v v
y y MM M
iS s s s s s s'
I// lll
--•-
PR0P0S£D CONTOUR
CONC. BROW DffCH
P£R DU 4/ SlfT J
CUT/F1t.L UNE
FILL SLOPE:
CUT SLOPE:
RfTAINING WALL Pf SDRS0
C- 4 5 FT MAX HEJGIIT
(E) RfTAIHING/ S1TE WALL
SPOT El.£VAT10N
([) EDGE OF PAVOIOO
EAIITH£NEl(RM
DET I/ SHT J
BIOFJL!RATJON 8.'SIN
P£R DITAII. J ANO JA/ SHT J- Pf/lWJ/fNT 8/JP
0 4 • AR£A DRAIN NOS BOX
OR EOUI>'.
III] 12• SQ NOS BOX OR EOUI>'.
ii jj jj jj j j j 11lfHOj ORAi/i HOS OR fQU(V.
---- 6"/4"W SDR-J5 STORM ---- DRAIN PfPf
II R1P RN' [Nf:RG'r DISSIPATOR
P£R DU. 2/ SHT J
I: 5• THICK DRl',£WAY
CONCRfTE PA'ANG
.. (E) POI/IER PCU
(E) BUJG /Al/TS
,,,,,,~ PROl'OSED BUJG UM/TS
- CONCRflE HE}l)WAU.
P£R DU. 5/ SHT J
• 4 • STORII DRAIN CWJiOIJT
P£R DET J/ SHT J
--c- (E) G4S UNE
--f- (E) SOGM UNE (CMl1HOO)
__ ,_ --TV-
--•- ([) SEWER UNE
(E) WAID/ UNE
(E) N OOH (CMRHOO)
□ (N) DOWNSPOUTS .,..-.. ,,
(E) WAID/ M[IDI
(E) SEWER CWJiOIJT
ABBRf'r'IATIQNS
FF
FP
n;
IE
111'
FS
ro
(E)
pt
PRP.
FWl5HE!) FLOOR EllVAOOH
F1NtSHED PNJ OLVATKJH
TOP OF GRATE
/INERr EllVAOOH
TOP OF WALL
flHISH[/)S/Jllf"ACf
flHISH[O GRADf
EXIS1IHG
PROPERTY UHE PROPOSED
.fJ!llI.S;_
I (E) TREE
--- CONCRflE SPUSH WALL P£R SORSD C- 09, C-10, 1YPf A
1 B" MAX EXPOSED HfJGIIT
EmrHWORK QUANTTT1ES CVT: ___ gz=a~ ~G~Y
FILL: --=2=290~~G~Y
IMPORT: l,J20 CY
E.XPORT: 0 CY
CONTRACTOR TO VER1FY DIJCT LOCATKJN OF EXIST1/IG /IIPR(M}JENTS AND l/1IU1Y lJl/£5 PRIOR TO CONS1RUC1)()N.
£XIS11NG EASO/£NIS KEYNOTES
ITEM NUIIBERS P£R PREUMINARY 11TI.£ RfPORT BY WFG NATIONAL 11TI.£ COIIPANY, ORDER HO. 18-1 74905, LMTED JUNE 27, 201B.
1. AN E.AS£MOO FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWH BfLOW AND RICI/TS INC/DDITAL THERfTO
AS GRANTED IN A DOCUMENT
GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COIIPANY
PURPOSE: POLES, lilRES AND ANCHOIIAGf FOR THE 111ANSM/SSKJN
ANO DISTRIBUTION OF ELECIRICTTY
RfCORDCD: fTilRUARY 19, 1958 IN BOOK 6957 AND PAGE 77, OF OFflCIAL RfCOROS AFFECTS: A PORTION OF SAID LAND
(SURVEYOR'S HOTE: £ASEi/ENT ITEM IS HOT Pt.OTTED, PORTIOHS OF THE DOCt/MfHT IS ILLEGIBLE. EASEMOO APPfARS TO Bf FOR CMl1HEAI) POll£R UNE:S.) 0 ~ :rlNro: !:iu~ SHOWH BfLOW ANO RICI/TS IHCIDEHTAL THERfTO GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COIIPANY
PURPOSE: PCUS, lilRES ANO ANCHOIIAGf FOR THC TfWISM/SSKJN TOTAL 11/PDMOUS/ PE1MO(J5 ARfA ~
6C-3 I PROTECT OUTDOOR W.TERIALS STORAGE MEAS FROM RAINFALL, RUN- ON, RUNOFF, AND WIND DISPERSAL PROTECT 7RASH STORAGE MEAS FROM RAINFALL, RUN- ON,
RUNOFF, AND WIND D/SffRSAL
RfCORDCD:
AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELEC1111Cf1Y
MARai 27, 1958 IN BOOK 7011 AND PNJE IJ7, OF OFflCIAL RfCORDS THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND DESIGNATED ON SAID IIAP HO. PRf-DEl'EI.OP!IOO ARfA NAME IMPEIMO(J5 PE1MO(J5
(SF) (SF)
(E) HOUSf/ DRl',£WAY/ 14,970
IWIOSC4Pf
(E) PVT. 8,400 - STRfET
PRP.
HOUSE/ - DRl\£WAY
TOTAL 2J,J70 51,100
0+25.00 0+50.00
APPRO\IED FOR CONSTRUCTION
POST-DEl'EI.OP!IOO
/IIPEIMO(J5 PE1MO(J5
(SF) (SF)
-
~
SB] ADDITJOw.L BMPs ll4SE ON POTENllAL SOURCES OF RUNOFF POLLl.lr..wTS - DNSITE STORM DBNN INLETS
~
Ll,HDSC,N'f/ DI.JTDOOR PESTICIDE USE
SUE DESIGN tllfl 8,400
2J,455
Jl,855
0+75.00
-
42,61 5
~
6D-2 i
68]
5D-4 i 5D-5 I
5D-6 I
6D-7 i
1+00 00
1+00.00
DRIV£WAY PROFILE A-A
SCALE: 1 "=20'- 0"
WJNT)JN NATURAL DRAINAGE, PATHWAYS AND
HYVROLOG/C Ff.ATURfS
CONSERl/f NATURAL AREAS, SOILS AND
VEGETATION
MINIMIZE IMPERVIOUS ARfA
MINIMIZE SOIL COIIPACTJON
IIIPfRVIOUS ARfA DISffRSKJN
RUNOFF COI.LECTJON
LAN/JSCIPf WITH I/ATM' OT DROUGHT
TOI.DWIT SPECIES
l+B~.00
=a r•:.251
JI--+-
_ _ m
1+25.00 1+50.00 J +75.00 l+BB.00
JJ0.00
J20.00
JI0.00
JOO.DO
290.00
285.00
AFFECTS: #2J, AS "EASDIOO RES[IMJ) FOR RO\D"
0 ~ ~ ~ :cu~ SH0WH BfLOW ANO RICI/TS IHCIDENTAL THERfTD RfSERV[!) BY: JOHN B. TRUOG AND EUZABOH W. TRUOG
PURPOSE: RO\D, LAYING PfPf UNE, SEWER PfPf UNES, G4S UNES AND 7El£PfiONE
RfCORDCD: JUNE 5, 1958 IN BOOK 7109, PAGE 19J OF OFflCIAL RfCORDS AFFECTS: THAT POlmON OF SAID LAND SHOWH ON RfCORO OF 5tJRVrY IIAP #2J AND OCSKJNATED THfJlroll AS c.4SOIOO RfSERV[!) FOR RO\D" 0 ~ :r,Nro: !:iu~ SHOWN BfLOW ANO RICI/TS INCIDDITAL THERfTD GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COIIPANY
PURPOSE: PCUS, lilRES AND ANCHOIIAGf FDR THE TfWISM/SSKJN RfCORDCD:
AFFECTS:
ANO D/S1R1BUTION OF ELEC1111Cf1Y
MARai 1B, 1960 AS /NS7Rt/llOO HO. 566JJ, OF OFflCIAL RfCORDS HORTHEASIERLY 100.0 FID OF SOUTHWES1ERLY 16J.O FID OF OF NOR1HWESTERL Y 6.0 FID OF SAID LANO 0 ~ :rlNro: !:iu~ SHOWH BfLOW AND RICI/TS INC/DDITAL THERfTD GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO G4S & ELECIRIC COIIPANY
PURPOSE: PCUS, lilRES AND ANCHORAGE FOR THE TfWISM/SSKJN AND DISTR18U110II OF ELECTRICITY RfCORDCD: fTilRUARY 26, I 96J AS INS1RUMOO HO. J.3429 OF OFflCIAL RfCORDS AFFECTS: A PORTION OF SAID LAND
[I] ~ :r,Nro_: ;;,fr1:mRPOSE SHOWN BfLOW AND RICI/TS /NC/DDITAL THERfTD GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO G4S & ELECTRIC COIIPANY, A CORPORA110N, ITS PURPOSE:
RfCORDCD:
AFFECTS:
SUCCESSORS AND A5SlGHS FOR THC TfWISM/SSKJN AND DISTRIBUTION OF GAS ANO FOR AU. PURPOSES CONNECTED THERfWfTH, UPON, ALONG AND UNOCR THE H£ROH.IFTER DESCR/8£0 RfGI/T OF WAY ffillltJARY 14, 1969 AS INSTRUl/00 HO. 27~ OF OFflCIAL RfCORDS A P0RTJ0N OF SAID LAND
AS-BUILT
By· _______ Dote: __ _
ER1N RIST
R.C.E.· 65122 Exp: O'il/ J0/ 202J
BENCH MARK CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTM ENT DRAWING NO. ffllENGINEERING ::::====== l'l'DESl~,.,~~9u r By: ERIN E. RIST Dote: ____ By: ________ Date: ___ By: ________ Dote·~--~: ::!f:7=== Drown By PE: 65122 Exp Dote: 9_ 30_ 21 t=======================~t===t=j lrAohommod Sommok, City Engineer r:::'f'Cru:"'~f&lnEWIER<IAa.t.-«~ GRADING PLAN FOR: SBGR-390
FOMON PROPERTY, 4250 NORTH LANE
By: Dote·___ R.C.E.: 37146 Exp: 6/30/20 El.EV.: J1!S.148 MlUM: ~voee COPYIINEI/. 5-19- 10MI-W
FOOTING D£EP(N
TO 0/SfN/Cf TO
ll4YUGHr PfR
SOIL '5 EJ/GINITR
RfCOlil/JE:Nll4TIOIIS
DEMOLITION KEYNOTES
0 EXISTING RESIDEHC£ TO Bf Rfl«MD BY
SEP.W.Tc P£RIIIT 0 fX/STING POOL AND SPA TO Bf Rfl«MD
0 fXISTll/G DRMWAY TO Bf RDICMD
0 fX/ST11/G SITc/ RITilH/NG WALLS TO
Elf Rfl«MD
0 fX/STING liN/OSCIPE TO Bf R£MOVf1)
CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
CD =t;/1~AC~ ~5~GR_gu-·
@ £Nm/£H B£11IJ PfR DCT. 1/ SI/CIT J
@ :'fli1AJ710N /l,1,5/H PfR DCTJIL J AND JAi
0 :~ E:NERGY CHSS/PATOR 5'X5', DCT. 2/
@ CONCRm: H£ADll'ALL PfR D£T. 5/ SHEET J
@ 4 • N1£A DRAIN HDS BOX DR EQUTV.
(J) 4. SIJR-J5 STORII DRAIN P/Pf AT 2" IJIH.
@ 12• SQ DRAIN INLET NDS BOX OR EQUIV.
@ 6" S0R-J5 STORM DRAIH PIPf AT 2,C IJIH.
@ R£T WALL 5'-4" FT IW( HfJG/fT PfR
SDRSD C-4, SIT S£C710N 8-8/ SHr 2 @ 4 • STORM DRAIN ct.£ANOUT PfR D£T J/ SHr J
@ 12" WIDE 111£HCH DRAIN HDS OR EQUlv.
@ ~ BROW DITCH PfR DCTJIL 4/
@ ~~~-II'~ 7:~~-
ffllENGINEERING
DESIGN GROUP www.rluS'{}nf}IOO/X;,!COffl
SQG<tE CONDUCTOR CLEARANCE NOTE·
1. = 0/SfNICE fflOII FINISH GROUND TO TH£ TcNSIOII
OOlt£ VA/11£5, IIIHIIIUII 6 FT IWC/IIUIJ 26 FT (ll'TTHIH N1£A Of' WORK}.
2. = 0/SfNICE fflOII FINISH GROUND TO TH£
E:NERGIZED C0HDUCT0RS VARICS, IIIHII.IUII 17 FT IW(fl.lUII 27 FT (ll'TTHIH N1£A Of' ll'ORK).
NOTc, >BOVE 1./EASURfl.lfNIS GMN AT THE NOmH EDGE OF
TH£ S/JGt£ EASDIE:NT. DRMWAY/V[H/Cl£ ACCESS ARflt, IS
OU1'S/OC Of' THE SDG.t£ fASEllE:NT. S££ R£FER£NC£ SDG.t£ COND/TlONS ON 51/f.ET J.
..
"' ' ' "' ' ' "' ' ' "' '
V£
I
I
40 I Feet
\
Sl'.XJR\X COHTROf,, BNP,;
PR£VfNOON Of' ILLICIT DISCHARGE:s INTO 1154
LEGEND
HW"22"iiiir PROP£1rrY BOUH04RY
S£JBACKS
fASEllE:NT
[317Y- - _..,(Jll) fXISTlllG CONTOUR
---J15__..,. PROPOSED CONTOUR
~ ---,..,_ - ~:ii~ .t FLOW
~
=
v v
y y
MM M
iS s s s s s s i
/{I It/
--• --
COHC. BROW DITCH
PfR D£T 4/ SHr J
CUT/FILL UN£
FILL SLOff
CUT SLOff
RITJINING WALL Pf SDRSD C- 4 5 FT IWC HfJGHT
(£) RITJIHING/ SITt WALL
SPOT £LEVA710N
(£) EDGE OF PA\91ENT
f'ARTHE:N BERII D£T 1/ SHr J
BKJF1LTRA710N /l,1,5/N
PfR DCTM. J AND JA/ 51/T J-PfRIWIE:NT 81,/P
--•-- (£) S£1l'ER UN£
--•- (E) WATER UN£
(£) WATER /JETER
(£) S£1l'ER ct.£ANOUT
t,BBREVIAT10NS
ff
FP
n;
1£
1W
F'S
ro
(E)
PL
/'Rf' .
F'HISHED FLOOR EI.EVAIXW F'HISHED PNJ EI.EVATXW
TOP OF GRATE
1/NfRrEI.fVATXW
TOP OF "'1L
F1NISl/£D SI/Rf'AC£
F'HISHED GIW]£
fXISTIHG
PROf'ER1Y UH£
PROPOSED
.N01IS;,
@ 4" N1£A DRAIN HDS BOX
OR £QUI>'.
Ill] 12" SQ NDS BOX OR EQUI>'.
111111111! 1 TR£HCH ORNH HOS OR EQUf>',
---- 61/ 4" DIA S0R-J5 STORII ---- DRAIH PfPf
E] RIP RN' E:N£RGY DISSIPATOR
PfR DCT. 2/ 51/T J
I·: 5• TH/CK DRf>Ol).Y
CONCRfl'£ PA\ING
"- (£) POWER POLE
(£) BLDG I.Al/IS
>;;;;;~ PROPOSED BLDG UIJ/15
- COHCRfTE HEADl/fALL
PfR DET. 5/ SHr J
• 4 • STORM DRAIN CLENIOUT
PfR DET J/ 51/T J
--G- (£) GAS UN£
--£-- (£) SlJG.t£ UN£ (CM11H£AD)
--IV-- (£) TV C'8LE (CM11H£AD)
□ (H) DOWHSPOUTS ,r--., (£) TRff \,....) CONCRm: SPV.S/1 WALL PfR 5DRSD C- 09, C-10, TYPf A 18" IWC £XPOS£D HfJGHT
CONTRACTOR TO \IERIFY EXACT LOCA710N Of' £X/ST1HG IIIPR!MMDITS AND UTILITY UNCS PRIOR TO COIIS7RUCOON.
EXISTING EASf:MfN[S KEYNOTES
/T£II NUMBERS PfR PRrul.llNARY 171l£ REPORT BY Wf'G NATJONAL 171l£ COIIPAHY, ORDER NO. 18-174905, 04'/ED JUNE 27, 2018.
1. NI £ASD1£Ht FOR THE PURPOS£ SHOll'N 8£1.0W AND R1GHTS IHCIDDITAL THfJlf'/0 AS G/W/T£D IN A OOCUI.IE:NT.
GRNITED TO: SAN DIEGO 00 .t £l..£C711/C COIIPAHY PURPOSE, POL£5, WIRES AND NICHORAG£ FOR THE TRNISIJISSK)N AND DISTRIBU110N OF £!£C7R/CITY
RfCOROED, mlRUARY 19, 1958 IN BOOK 6957 AND P!GE 77, Of' OfflCW. /?£CORDS AFITCTS: A POROON Of' SAJD LAND
(SUIMYOR'S NOTc, fAS£l/E:NT ITDI 1S NOT PLOTTED, PORT10NS Of' THE OOCUll£/IT IS II.LEGIBLE. E:A5DIE:NT APPfARS TO Bf FOR CNfRH£J,[) POWER UHES.) 0 ~ :1',Nro: :fu~ SHOll'N 8£1.0W ANO R1GHTS INCIDE:NTAL THfJlf'/0 G/W/T£D TO, SAN DIEGO 00 .t £!£CTRIC COIIPAHY PURPOSE, POL£5, WIRES AND NICHORAG£ FOR THE T1WISIIISSK)N TOTAL IIIPflMOUS/ PfJMOUS N1£A PROTcCT OUTDOOR IIAID11ALS STORAGE MW FROM RAINFALJ.. RUH-ON, RUNOF'f, AND WIND DISP£RSAL PROTcCT 7RASH STORAGE MW FROM RAINFALJ.. RUH- ON,
RUNOFF, AND WIND DISP£RSAL
RfCOROED,
AFITCTS:
ANO DISTfl/8U110/I Of' £!£C7R/CITY
IIARCII 27, 1958 IH BOOK 7011 AND PK!£ 1J7, Of' OfflC/,\/.. RfCOROS THI.T PORTION Of' SAID WID 0£5/GNA'/ED ON SAID MAP NO.
TOTAL Sl1t PRf:-D£Yfl.OPIIE:NT
(Sf) N1£A HAI.IE 1/JPfJMOUS PfJMOUS
(Sf) (Sf)
(£) HDUSE/ DRMWAY/ 14,970
HAROSCN'f
74,470 (£) PVT 8,400 - S1Rf£T
PRP.
HOUSE/ -
DRrv£11'AY
TOTAL 2J,J70 51,100
0+00 00
JJD ""
J20. 00:
,"51/1958
~J-GF-0 . .
J10. 00:
3,~ - = 2
00: ;L~tfln=----'-"'·-
0 20 40
1~[=:l-.■■■■ 1 Feet SCA!£: 1 ·-20·-o·
JOO.
290.
285.
-
~ "" 0+00.00
CITY APPROVED CHANGES APP'D DATE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL -
=a
' 0+25.00 0+50.00
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
POST-D£Yfl.OPIIE:NT
11/PfJMOUS PfJMOUS
(Sf) (Sf)
-
NJDITJONAL 81./Ps BASE ON POIDITIAL SOURCCS OF RUNOFF
POUUT.AHTS - QNSl1E STORM DBNN IHLETS LANQSCAP£/ OUTDOOR PrnlCtQE USE EO!)J.._SJ'f, SIT[ PESK'.N ElfPI 8,400
21,055
29,455
-
45,075
§EJ
so-21
60-3 j
60-4 j
60-5 j
6D-6j
6D-7 j
1+00 00
-
1/A/NTJIH NATUIW. DRA/NAG£, PATIIWA)S AND
HYDRO!.OG/C IV,TUR£5
CONS£RVf: NATUIW. AREAS, SOILS AND
VEGETA110N
IJIN/IJIZE 1/JPfRVIOUS ARE).
1./INII.IIZE SOIL COIJPAC110N
11/PfRVIOUS ARE). D/SP£RS/ON
RUNOFF COLLEC110N
WIDSCAl'f WITH NATM OT DROUGHT
TOLERANT SPECJCS
/+BB 00
-= h . '"-c3J4., ,~ ., ,:v.c; ~
- •Jl-2,0
JJO .00
J20 .00
JI0 .00
JOO .00
!'/~¥
0+75.00 1+00.00
DRNEWAY PROFILE A-A
SCALE: 1"=20'-0"
1+25.00 1+50.00 1+75.00 1+88.00
290 .00
285 .00
#2J, AS "rASDIE:NT R£SDM]) FOR RONJ"
0 ~ ~ ~ 1::cu';J:;sc SHOll'N 8£l.OW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THfJlf'/0 R£S£RVED BY, JOHN 8. TRUOG AND £1.JZABOH II'. TRUOG
PURPOSE, ROIJJ, U.'IING PIPf UN[, S£1l'ER PIPf UHES, 00 UHCS AND Tfl.£PHON£ RfCOROED, JUN£ 5, 1958 IH BOOK 7109, PAGE: 19J Of' OfflC/,\/.. RfCORC)5 AFITCTS: THI.T PORTION Of' SAID WID SHOWN ON RfCORD Of' StllMY MAP #2J AND D£5/GNAJED THERfON AS tASDIE:NT R£S£RVED FOR RON)" GJ ~ :7"1NFD: ;::VI.I~ SHOWN BELOW ANO R1GHTS INCIDENTAL THfJlf'/0 G/W/T£D TO, SAN DIEGO 00 .t ELECTRIC COIIPAHY PURPOSE: POL£5, WIRES AND NICHORAG£ FOR THE 11WISIIISSK)N AND DISTRlllUTJOH Of' £!£C7R/CITY
RfCOROED,
AFITCTS:
IIARCII 18, 1960 AS IHSTRUI.IE:NT NO. 566JJ, Of' DmCIAL /?£CORDS NOR1HEASIDILY 100.0 FITT Of' SOUTHW£ST£RLY 16J.O FITT OF Of' HORTllll'£STER1Y 6.0 FITT Of' SAID LAND 0 ~ :1'1Hro: :fu~ - BELOW AND R1GHTS INC/DENTAL THfJlf'/0 GRNITED TO: SAN DIEGO 00 .t ELEC'/111C COIIPAHY PURPOSE, POL£5, WIRCS AND ANCHORAGE FOR THE T1WISII/SSION AND DISTRt8U110N Of' ELECTRICITY R£CORO£D, mlRUARY 26, 196J AS IHSTRUIIE:NT NO. 33429 Of' OfflC/,\/.. Rf CORDS AFITCTS: A POROON OF SAJD WID
0 ~ :7',to: ;;:~ SHOWN BELOW AND R1GHTS INCIDENTAL THfJlf'/0 G/W/T£D TO: SAN DIEGO 00 .t ELECTRIC COIIPAHY, A CORPORATION, /IS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS PURPOSE, FOR TH£ T1WISII/SSKJN AND DISTRIBU110N OF GAS AND FOR ALL PURPOSES CONH£CTFJJ THER£WITH, UPON, ALONG AND UHOCR THE HERflN>FTER D£SCR10CD RfGI/T Of' WAY RfCOROED, mlRUARY 14, 1969 AS IHSTRUIJE:NT NO. 27652 Of' OfflC/,\/.. /?£CORDS AFITCTS: A POROON Of' SAJD LAND
AS-BUILT
By_· ______ Dote: __ _
ERIN RIST
R.C.E., 65122 Exp, 09/30/2023
BENCH MARK CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO.
DESCRPTlOH: Wt~'§f_JJ~~~IDUEJE GRAD/NG PLAN FOR, II By: ERIN E. RIST Dote: ____ t----- ----- ----t-----,t----< By, _ _ _ _ ____ Dote: _ __ By, ___ _____ Date: ___ LOCATION: »£IDUE>lftSLOOOa>~FfEillRIH1l.YfFf«1UIIJ Drown By PE: 65122 Exp Dote: 9_ 30_ 21 Mohammad Sommok, City Engineer 'IJ~a.i:',JJf~MCBIERfFAOJ.-CE.-&C FOMON PROPERTY, 4250 NORTH LANE SBGR-390
By: Dote·_ __ R.C.E.: 37146 Exp: 6/30/20 El.f.Y.: 315.148 o,t.TUM: t,,lA.IJUM COP WWO,. &-19-1069-W
ARTIFICIAL TURF
•- Wu$~UU#~ ,,.,,,..,,..,,.==
........................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .
RESIDENCE
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........
. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
ARTIFICIAL TURF
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
..r1-r
L_H_Y_D_RO_Z_O_N_E_L;_EG_:_E_N_D ______________ __,I 't' ~~~.;::.ER_,< ZONE
1 2
3 4
5 7
Scale ,.., 10'-0"
SYMBOL
I ~ . .. . . I ............
........... .............
. . . . . . . . . . . ..............
. . . . . . . . . . . ............ . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
HYDROZONE CALCULATIONS
N
WATER USE
IP SEE SHEET Ll.2 FOR
FULL SUN/ MEDIUM WATER USE
DRIP
FULL SUN/ LOW WATER USE
SPRAY
FULL SUN/ MEDIUM WATER USE
DEEP WATER BUBBLER
FULL SUN/ LOW WATER USE
DEEP WATER BUBBLER
FULL SUN/ LOW WATER USE
ROTORS
CALCULATIONS
~
! AM FAM!UAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WATER EFFICIENT REGULATIONS .
I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN !N COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS AND THE LANDSACPE DESIGN MANUAL! CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER. UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY,! AFFIRM THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
BY, __ /11.,___/;_~,._ ___ _ DATE 6/14/2022
MELISSA LANGER MWSSAtAUGE/121:.l.l~GMAlL-COM
z
<(w
_JU
o._z LLl
w z
wo <( <( _J u z V) I a::.~
I- ow a::. <(
N c.c 0 ~ z _J
oz 0 LLl
L[) 0
0::: 0 N
0~
'tj'"
>- f:2
I
Ll.1
6/14/2022
<r:
w
z
:::;
I
u
~
~
MATCH LINE B
<r: ...... +. + .... + ...................................... + .. +. + ...... .. •••• + ••• + + .. + + + ....... + ... + •• +. +. +. +. + ....... + •• +. + .. + • + + + ...... + .. + + ..... + +. + + ... + + ........ + .. + .. + + + + .. + ...... + •• + .. + + + .... + .... + ..... + .... + + + + ... + + ...... + + + ..... + .... + ... + .. + •• +. + ••• + + .... +. + + ...... + + +. + .. + ........... + + + .. + .... + + + ... + + ....... + ............. + ..... + + .. +. + ... + + + •• + ...... + + + • w • + .. + + ........ + ..... + .... + + + + ...... + .. +. + .... + ... +. + .. + .. + + ... z :::; I+------------------
U
~
~
CONCRETE
MATCH LINE B
o
~ s 1cr 2cr
ARTIFICIAL TURF
--- -
l AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED INTHE CITY OF ENCINITAS WATER EFFICIENT REGULATIONS .
I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN JN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS AND THE LANDSACPE DE51GN MANUAL I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS
THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, I AFFIRM THAT THE FOREGOING 15 TRUE AND CORRECT.
BY, __ fn_~~~---- DATE 6/14/2D22
WATER USE CALCULATIONS FOR: 4250 NORTH LANE, SOLANA BEACH, CA MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE CALCULATIONS WHERE:
ETo =REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION (WEST OF 1-5 CIMIS)
MAWA= ETAF =ET ADJUSTMENT FACTOR (55% FOR RESIDENTIAL MAWA CALCS) BASIC MAWA= ETo x ETAF x LA (sq. ft.) x CONST.= MAWA GPY S.ETAF =ET ADJUSTMENT FACTOR ADD FOR SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA (45% FOR MAWA CALCULATION) LA =LANDSCAPE AREA
S.LA MAWA= ETo X S.ETAF X LA (sq. ft.) x CONST.= S.LA MAWA GPY S.LA =SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA DEFINEED AS EDIBLE PLANTS, ACTIVE RECREATION, RECYCLED WATER CONST =CONSTANT TO CONVERT TO GALLONS PER YEAR (GPY)
MAWA = (47 x .55 x 29,807 x 0.62) = 477,717 GPY GYP =GALLONS PER YEAR ETWU = ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE
ETWU = ETo x 0.62 x (PF X HA/ IE+ S.LA)
ETWU = 47 x 0.62 x (PF X HA/ IE+ S.LA)
HYDROZONE LEGEND
ZONE
1 2
3 4
5 SYMBOL
r · --·-·- · ----·1 .................. ........................ ....................
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. ...................... .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. + ............. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. -
vvvvvvvvvvvv,;,vv
VVV'.'VVV'.'VVVVVVV
VVVVVVVV?VVVVVV
V? l:'V V V t>V I:''>' V 'rt> VV
VVVVVVVVVl:'VVVVV
vvvvvvv,;,vvvvvvv
V'.''.'VV'.'Vl:'V'.'VV".'?V
V'.'VV".'VVVVVVV?V'.'
■
WHERE:
ETWU =ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE IN GALLONS PER YEAR
ETo =EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN INCHES PER YEAR
0.62 = CONVERSION FACTOR TO GALLONS PER SQUARE FOOT
PF= PLANT FACTOR FROM WUCOLS
HA= HYDROZONE AREA IN SQ. FT. EACH HA SHALL BE CLASSIFIED BASED UPON HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW OR VERY LOW
WATER USE
IE =IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY OF THE IRRIGATION METHOD USED IN THE HYDROZONE
HYDROZONE CALCULATIONS
rn:-crRIPTlnN
FULL SUN/ LOW WATER USE 47 x (0.3 x 1.0 x 1.00) x 893 X 0.62 = 9,758 ETWU GPY DRIP 0.80
FULL SUN/ MEDIUM WATER USE 47 x (0.5 x 1.0 x 1.00) x 4,009 x 0.62 = 1_17,764 ETWU GPY DRIP 0.80
FULL SUN/ LOW WATER USE 47 x (0.3 x 1.0 x 1.00) x 7,332 x 0.62 = 106,827 ETWU GPY SPRAY 0.60
FULL SUN/ MEDIUM WATER USE 47 x (0.5 x 1.0 x 1.00) x 960 x 0.62 = 19,982 ETWU GPY DEEP WATER BUBBLER 0.7
FULL SUN/ LOW WATER USE 47 x (0.3 x 1.0 x 1.00) x 16,613 x 0.62 207,473 ETWU GPY ROTORS 0.7
TOTAL ETWU:
461,804 GPY
I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
HYDROZONE CATEGORY PF- PLANT FACTOR (AVG.)
HIGH WATER USE D.S
MODER.ATE WATER USE 0.5
LOW WATER USE 0.3
VERY LOW WATER USE 0.1
SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA 1.0
HYDROZONE CATEGORY !S BASED ON THE FEATURE OR PLANT
WITHIN THE HYDROZONE WITH THE HIGHEST PLANT FACTOR
IRRIGATION METHOD ABBREVIATION !E- IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY S= SPRAY 0,6
R = ROTOR 0,7
D= DRIP 0.S
B = BUBBLER 0.7
M EU SSA LANG ER [email protected]
760-815-5793
z
<(w
_Ju
CLZ w w z
wo <( <( _J u z V) I a::.' I- ow a::. <(
Na:: 0 ~ z _J
oz 0 w LI) 0
0:::: 0 N
0~
<::j-
>-~
I
Ll.2
6/14/2022
---------------- ------ --------------; ........... -- I ~~----•••-••--•••••••••••••••"'"'"'"""'"' ____ .., __ ,__.., ___ ..,,.;.._..,..,.,._..,..,.., ......... -----~ "'"'"'"' "'"""'"'"'' ."'"'"'"'"""'"'•"'"' """'' .., .. .., I ,------------,
I
I
~--, --- , ----' I I
I I
I I
I l
I l
I l
I I~ I I
r--<1---~---"---+----<>----'1 t -===== Q ::::--1
i i :~0
: I I I I
I o
: : I 1
I I
I 1
: l 0 I I I
0_j : : I I I 0 0 I I I I 0
t_J ..... J
o • I
I •·+••1••·························-·························-······························· I I ' ' I I
. I ' 0
. ' . ' : :
1 i
I l • I 0 I I I
I o
I : l I I
I I
I I
I 0
: I I I
1 I I I
I I
I i
l
r-----------------1! i ·----------------
r--------------------------------------------- ' I I
..
I 1
I l 1 I
l l 1 1
: : I I
l I
1 I
I I
I I
! i I 1
1 ' I I
1 I I I
1 l I I
I • I I
0 I
0 I 0 I
-·' '-----------------------------------------------.,} 7 ]
i i>-<'--~-<
I
i
' ' ' 1
j
~
I ': l i : : \«>- r··················· "
•t•••t •••• ••••••••••••••• ■•••••••••••••••: _ :-•--1 .. _________ ..,,.. .......... ____ J_ .., .. i i : : i i ._.._,,,, __ _ I I '-••"""'"'"' ,.. .................................... ..,.,..., "'"'"'"""'""""""-•••-•--•---••-----•••• •••• "'"'"""" ' 1 i i •------1'1--------~----~1'---1'1 o I I 0 I I
I I
I I
' ' I I
0 I I I
I 0 I I
: : I I
' I ' 0
'\/'
f
\
l : 0:-------e---------<!>-----+r--+------~t---Y,-(i,~l--------e--------e--------e------- e I 0 I o I I I : : . I I I I I I I I I
' O ' I I . : t t I I • I I •
i i t ' e---------4-.,--------.,--------+.,--~----"--------.., ________ ., ________ ., :
\ \ .Ii I 0
l 1 l
' ' . I O -------= /
! ! --------+---r----+--...-L-------- ,.~,,----------,\ •• 0 0
0 I \ ~---------· ,//·:::::.>✓/ : : ;' / I l l ,,,,,,,- _,,,,,,- " i I j I I I ' / : : _______ _
MV : \ ,,' ,, ,,,' '\ i , ........... .. : ' \_ ____________ __..__. ,,' ,,,' ,, \ Q .................. :
! n .. ~-------------------
_______ _/ _// --= = = = = = = = = - - : ~ ~::::::::::::::: = = ~/~ ________ .':~~=~~~~~==~~~---------------------- 1 l !l~:=~===~~-- / :
REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE VALVE
~ - CONTROLLER STATION
VALVE SIZE - \:l::/- GALLONS PER MINUTE
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
- CONTROLLER STATION
VALVE SIZE- - GALLONS PER MINUTE
REFER TO SHEET Ll.4 FOR IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
Seale
~
1""10'·0"
10' 20'
I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED IN THE C!TYOF ENCINITAS WATER EFFICIENT REGULATIONS. ! HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS AND
THE LANDSACPE DESIGN MANUAL I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER. UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY,! AFFIRM THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
BY., __ :._/17ifi,c::~.c_,_: ___ _ DATE 6/14/2D22
MELISSA LANGER MEUSSAt.ANGER212l@GMAILCOM
Zw
<Cu
_J z w
0... Ll.J z
zo <( <( _J u
I a::.'
otD Ia::. <(
cc 0 ~
l-z z _J
0 w
<Co Lf) 0
N
l9~ <:;j"
CC:0
CC: LL
Ll.3
6/14/2022
r
___ J
~~l
I .,.__j ", - ---e--
~
~ --- MATCH LINE B ---
~
&ille 1" .. 10'--0'"
0 S 10' 20'
MATCH LINE B
ARTIFICIAL TURF
..
--- --- --- --- --- ::--...
--- -
IRRIGATION LEGEND
IN-LINE DRIP
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/ MODEL DESCRIPTION
(-------------------.... ,, NETAFIM TLCV6-12025
DRIP LINE TUBING
AREA PERIMETER , .. _____ .. ______ .......... ........... ,
TREE BUBBLERS
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/ NOZZLE DESCRIPTION
• IRRITROL BUBBLER 533 BUBBLER
MISC. MATERIAL
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/ MODEL DESCRIPTION
s IRRITROL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE lOOPl
" IRRITROL REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE VALVE WITH lOOPl PRESSURE REGULATING BASKET FILTER H SPEARS UTILITY BALL VALVES PVC NOT NETAFIM TL050MFV-1 APPLICABLE LINE FLUSHING VALVE
NOT NETAFIM ½" AIR/VACUUM RELIEF AIR VENTS TLAVRV APPLICABLE IYI0 DOMESTIC WATER METER
00 HUNTER RAIN SENSOR MINI-CLIK
[ElEl POINT OF CONNECTION MINI-CLIK
lru FEBCO 2" BACKFLOW PREVENTOR 825Y
l]2] SUPERIOR 1-1/2" NORMALLY CLOSED MASTER 3200
VALVE
[ill CALSENSE FLOW SENSOR FM-1.25B
l&;l HUNTER ICORE 6-STATION CONTROLLER (IC-600-PL) WITH 4 EXPANSION MODULE (ICM-600)
ROTARY NOZZLES
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/ NOZZLE RAD.
360°210 1so· 90° 45° DESCRIPTION
.. " " RAIN BIRD 6" POP-UP MPSOOSR 6' HUNTER NOZZLE W/ HY FILTER .. " " HUNTER 6" POP-UP PGJ-06 20' PGJ ROTOR
0 0 0 RAINBIRD 12" POP-UP MP2000 20' HUNTER NOZZLE
RAINBIRD 12" POP-Ur MP3000 0 30' 0 HUNTER NOZZLE
PIPING
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/ MODEL DESCRIPTION
RAD.
N/A
RAD.
N/A
l AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED JN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WATER EFFICIENT REGULATIONS.
I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS AND
THE LANDSACPE DESIGN MANUAL I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER. UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, ! AFFIRM THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE ANO CORRECT.
DATE 6/14/2022
HOUSING FLOW PSI PRECIP.
RATF INSTALL 4" BELOW FINISH
GRADE. REFER TO DETAILS 0.60 GPH 30 .64 IN/HR
HOUSING FLOW PSI PRECIP.
RA,TE
N/A 2.27 GPM 30 N/A
HOUSING COMMENTS
CARSON #1419 W/ FLUSH COVER
CARSON #1419 W / FLUSH COVER
CARSON #1419 W/ FLUSH COVER VALVE SIZE TO MATCH LINE
SIZE
INSTALL PER MANUFACT.
SPECIFICATIONS
CARSON #1419 W/ FLUSH COVER INSTALL PER MANUFACT.
SPECIFICATIONS
INSTALL PER MANUFACT.
SPECIFICATIONS
INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF.
SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS
STRONG BOX SBBC-45SS INSTALL PER MANUF.
SPECIFICATIONS
CARSON #1419 W/ FLUSH COVER INSTALL PER MANUF.
SPECIFICATIONS
CARSON #1419 W/ FLUSH COVER INSTALL PER MANUF.
SPECIFICATIONS
INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF.
SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS
HOUSING GPM PSI PRECIP.
360°i210·1so·, 90• 45° RATE 1806-SAM-PRS 0.47 0.26 0.13 30 0.90 IN/HR 1806-SAM-PRS 1.0 0.5 0.25 40 0.59 IN/HR
1812-SAM-P45 1.48 0.85 0.46 45 0.46 IN/HR
1812-SAM-P45 1.93 0.90 45 0.47 IN/HR
HOUSING COMMENTS
............... IRRIGATION MAINLINE SCHEDULE 40 PVC INSTALL PER DETAILS SIZE PER PLAN IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE SCHEDULE 40 PVC INSTALL PER DETAILS SIZE PER PLAN SLEEVE SCHEDULE 40 PVC INSTALL PER DETAILS SEE SLEEVE DETAIL 'F' SHEET --------- Ll.5 MELISSA LANGER MHJSSAlANGfR212l@GMAILCOM
760-815-5793
Zw
<:(u
_J z w
o_ UJ z
WO <( <( _J u
o_ V) I a:::.' f-
<:(~ a:::. <(
0 ~
Uz z _J
0 w
l/)0 lf) 0
N
02 'tjZo
<:( LL
_J
Ll.4
6/14/2022
GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES
1. IT IS THE RESPONS!Bll!TY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL GRADE DIFFERENCES, LOCATION TREES, STRUCTURES ANO UTIUTJES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY, All ITEMS DAMAGED BY HIS WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE SLEEVES AND LATERALS THROUGH WALLS, UNDER ROADWAYS AND PAVING, ETC. 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS 'v\'HEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES, OR DIFFERENCES IN THE AREA DIMENSION EXIST THAT M!GHT NOT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED !N THE DESIGN OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS OR DIFFERENCES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. IN THE EVENT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSJB!LITY FOR ANY NECESSARY ALTERATIONS TO THE WORK 3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN, COORDINATE, ANO PAY FOR ANY ANO ALL INSPECTIONS AS REQUIRED 4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY ENCROACHMENT INTO ADJACENT PROPERTY, R OW,'S EASEMENTS SETBACKS OR ANY OTHER LEGAL PROPERTY RESTR!CT!ONS EITHER MARKED OR
UNMARKED
5 THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC ALL PIPING, VALVES, ETC,, SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTING AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL VALVES !N SHRUB OR GROUNDCOVER AREAS
6 TRENCHING WITHIN THE OR!PUNE OF LARGE EX!ST!NG TREES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY HAND, AND WITH EXTREME CARE NOT TO SEVER ROOTS M/2" IN DIAMETER AND LARGER WHERE ROOTS 1-1/2" IN DIAMETER AND LARGER ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TUNNEL UNDER SAID ROOTS. EXPOSED ROOTS THAT HAVE BEEN TUNNELED UNDER SHALL BE WRAPPED IN WET BURLAP AND KEPT MOIST WHILE THE TRENCH !S OPEN
7 PIPE SIZES SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF SMALLER PIPE SIZES SHALL BE PERMITTED, BUT SUBSTITUTIONS OF LARGER SIZES MAY BE APPROVED. All DAMAGED AND REJECTED PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE T!ME OF SAID REJECTION 8 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH AND ADJUST THE DRIP SYSTEM AND VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE 9 ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT NOT OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS ANO SPECIFICATIONS
10 ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, MASTER VALVES, FLOW SENSORS, FLUSH VALVES, AND PRESSURE RELIEF
VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUITABLE VALVE BOXES AS SHOWN IN DETAILS, COMPLETE WITH LOCKING COVERS ALL SHALL BE CARSON, AMTEC, OR APPROVED EQUAL, AND SHALL BE MARKED, "R C.V" FOR REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, "F S." FOR FLOW SENSORS, ETC PROVIDE EXPANSION COILS AT EACH WIRE CONNECTION !N
VALVE BOX AS PER DETAILS
11 THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER IS NEW WIRE NEW REMOTE CONTROL VALVES TO THE NEW CONTROLLER WITH NEW CONTROL WIRES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE 110 VAC POWER SUPPLY TO THE
CONTROLLER LOCATION REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT DUE TO THE SCALE OF THESE DRAWINGS THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE NEED FOR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE !RR!GATION SYSTEM MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROVIDE PROPER COVERAGE. THESE ADJUSTMENTS COULD INCLUDE NOZZLE CHANGES AND/OR ADD!TfON OR
DELETION OF INDIVIDUAL HEADS TO COMPENSATE FOR CHANGES MADE ON THE SITE FURTHERMORE,
THE IRRIGATION DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC, ALL PIPING, VALVES, ETC, SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATIONS ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED !N SHRUB AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE EXISTING CONDITIONS THE CONTRACTOR rs RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING ANY EXISTING DAMAGED ITEMS DURING
CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING HARDSCAPE, LIGHTING, DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, TREES, SHRUBS,
TURF AND GROUNDCOVER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANY AND ALL DAMAGED ITEMS TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER
EQUIPMENT BOXES ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, BALL VALVES, QUICK COUPLERS, ETC, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SPECIFIED GREEN SUBGRAOE VALVE BOXES AS SHOWN IN !RRlGATJON LEGEND COMPLETE WITH LOCKING COVERS
VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CARSON BROOKS OR APPROVED EQUAL AND SHALL BE MARKED 'G V' FOR GATE
VALVES, 'RC V 'FOR REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, ETC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE BOXES ARE ALSO TO BE HEAT BRANDED WITH THE CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER ALL MARKINGS SHALL BE 2" LETTERS
AND NUMBERS
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE LABELS ALL VALVES ARE TO BE FASTENED WITH CHRISTY'S VALVE IDENTIFICATION TAGS IDENTIFYING STATION# ANO APPROPRIATE CONTROLLER IOENT!FJCATION INFORMATION
SLEEVING
SLEEVES SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ALL COBBLE, CONCRETE OR AC PAVING WHERE IRRIGATION LATERAL, MAINLINE, AND WIRE CROSS SLEEVES SHALL BE PVC SCH 40, MINIMUM BURY 24" DEEP MINIMUM DISTANCE PAST COBBLE SHALL BE 24" WATER AND WIRE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN THE SAME SLEEVE SLEEVES TO BE TW1CE THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE BEING SLEEVED WIRE SLEEVES TO BET DIA POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE CEMENT IPS WELD-ON PVC 721 BLUE MEDIUM-BODIED (USE WITH 1/Z' TO 1-1/2" PVC PIPE) IPS WELD-ON PVC 711 GRAY HEAVY-BODIED (USE WITH 2H ANO LARGER PVC PIPE AND ALL MAIN LINES)
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PRIMER IPS WELD-ON P-70 PRIMER PURPLE (USE WITH ALL PVC CONNECTIONS)
DETECTABLE MARKING TAPE 'CHRISTY'S' UNDERGROUND MARKING TAPE SHALL BE RUN WITH ALL MAINLINES AND MUST BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 6» ABOVE TOP OF PIPE
DIRECT BURIAL CONTROL WIRES (SOLID COPPER, 600 VOLT, TYPE UF)
COMMON WIRES
WHITE (#12 AWG)
STATION WIRES
(#14 AWG) COLOR-CODED REQUIREMENTS PER CITY STANDARD SPARE WIRES MUST BE RUN
TO THE FARTHEST VALVE MANIFOLD FROM THE CONTROLLER
WIRE SPLICES/ CONNECTORS ARE TO BE 3M OBY DIRECT BURY SPLICE KIT USE EXTRA SEALANT !NS!DE CONNECTORS
PVC PIPE FITTINGS ALL FITTINGS CONNECTING PVC TO PVC SHALL BE SPEARS 'EverTUFF TURF FITTINGS' COLORED BLUE OR APPROVED EQUAL ALL PVC FITTINGS TO BRASS VALVES SHALL BE REINFORCED WlTH STAINLESS STEEL COLLAR
B
r M.AJNLINE PER PLAN
C,.••··t·····1····•.C, LINE SIZE BALL VALVE ~ 24' MAX.
5 ...•... 1 ....... . • ■ ■ ■ ■ 00~7 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE OR_/
REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE
KIT PER PLAN QUICK COUPLER
PER PLAN
VALVE MANIFOLD DIAGRAM
CLEAN COMPACTED
BACKFILL
FINISHED GRADE
UNDISTURBED SOIL
LATERAL LINES
MAINLINE AND CONTROL WIRES
NOTES:
1. TAPE CONTROL WIRES EVERY 1 O'
2. IN ROCKY SOILS INSTALL
PIPING IN SAND BED
L
Lu
3. 24" DEPTH REQUIRED FOR ALL DOMESTIC MAINLINES
D PIPE INSTALLATION
F
90% CLEAN BACKFILL AS REQUIRED.
PAVING
UNDISTURBED SOIL
MAINLINE AND CONTROL
WIRES IN SCH 40 SLEEVES
LATERAL LINES IN
SCH 40 SLEEVE
SLEEVE DETAIL
36'
~ ~------"· 'MIN.
w
NOiiOSC,IJ,.E A
BRASS WYE STRAINER~
WI 60 MESH S.S. SCREEN) ·.
BRASS NIPPLE~ 4" MIN. LENGTH (TYP.)
: ' BRASS 90 DEG. ELL (TYP.) : '
BRASS NIPPLE (TYP.)
,-ENCLOSURE- REFER
I TO IRRIGATION LEGEND
SCH.SO TOE NIPPLE (TYP.) CONCRETE BASE- 6' MIN. THICKNESS, EXTEND 4' BEYOND OUTSIDE OF ENCLOSURE
NOTES:
A STAKE OUT BACKFLOl'IPREVENTER LOCATIONS FOR R~EW ANO APPROVAL BY CITY. FINAL LOCATION AND EXACT POSITIONING OF THE BACK FLOW PREVBffER SHALL BE N'PROVEO BY THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATNES PRJOR TO INSTALLATION. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY RESULT ~1 RELOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER
PER CITY'S OIRECTION AT NO ADOITIONAL COST TO OWNER
B. INSTALL BACK FLOW PREVENTER Af, REOUIREO BY LOCAL CODES ANO HEALTH OEPARTMENT. VERIFY LOCPJ.
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
24' WIRE COIL ANO
WATERPROOF WIRE
CONNECTORS
PVC LATERAL 7 LINE \
\
BRICK
. .· . . . • ¢
I .. ... •"' . ;· SUPPORTS / _/ SCH 80 T O E NIPPLE _;
GRA~LC1~~~~~~ (2 REO.) /
PVC SLIP UNION _j
12REQ)
\/01!:s;ALLAilCN 10 SE CGVAETED !fl N'....CORCANCE wn,, !JA'Jl.FACTl/~RS SPEC:FrCATlONS ltOiiOSCAI.E
NOTE: HEAT BRAND 'RCV' AND
CONTROL STATION #ONTO UO
IN 2" LETTERS
N0'70XkE C REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ltOiTOSCAJ..E
E
2• IN SHRUB AREAS
FINISH GRADE --i
I
l
I
PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH LOCKABLE
COVER, BOX TO BE_ PLACED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO
HARDSCAPE EDGE
MA!NUt.'E -- I u •J, :
•0
FE/WE ADAPTER __!_i & 8 1 * • • • t.
BRASS UNION I t BRASS N!PPLE (TYP .) -
314• CRUSHED GAAVEL
12'' DEEP
BRICK SUPPORTS
NOTE
1 HEAT BRANO 'MV' ON LID IN 2" LETTERS
2 USE ALL BRASS PIPING TO DISCHARGE
SIDE OF MASTER VALVE
MASTER VALVE
MEUSSA LANGER ME:.!S~AlANGER212!@GMA!LCOM
760-815-5793
Zw
<Cu
_J z w o....w z
zo <( <( _J u
:r: cc.' otD Icc. <(
cc. 0 ~
l-z z _J
0 w
<Co If) 0
N
l.9~ s::::t
0:::0
0::: LL
Ll.5
6/14/2022
DRIP LINE TUBING
XFF-TEE
17MM BARB X BARB TEE
XF BLANK TUBING
STAKE ATS' O.C. \
XF-MA-075 -----;!l;;Q,
3/4" MPT X 17MM BARB
;;-TOP OF MULCH r FINISH GRADE
12"
PVC
LATERAUSUPPLY
LINE
D
H
DRIP LINE MANIFOLD TO TEE CONNECTION NOTTOSCAJ.E
NOTE
PLASTIC VAf.VE BOX, 10" ROUND
WITH LOCKABLE COVER
r-- 2" !N SHRUB MEAS
~---,._-,-,L,rFINISHGRADE
J 2•,~IN
314'CRUSHEOJ GRAVEL 12" DEEP
GATE VALVE
(REFER TO
IRRIGATION LEGEND)
PVC MAINLINE
AND FITTINGS
PVC MALE ADAPTER
NOTE: HEAT BRAND 'GV'
ONTO LID lN 2• LETTERS
BOX TO BE INSTALLED AS TO ALLOW FOR PROPER OPERATION OF GATE VALVE INSTALL VALVE OFF.CENTER IN BOX
GATE VALVE
------ FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS
PLASTIC VAL VE BOX
10' RNO. W/ LOCKABLE LID
.: BRICK SUPPORTS
- .. - PVC ELECTRICAL SWEEP
IF INSTALLED IN CONDUIT
3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL, 3 CUBIC FT
NOTE: HEAT BRAND 'PB'
ONTO LIO IN 2" LETTERS
L PULL BOX
MANUAL FLUSH VALVE
PVC FLUSH MANIFOLD7
. C::~=~:!: ,,,,,, FV
PVC LATERAL
FROM DRIP
ZONE KIT
MANIFOLD TO ELL CONNECTION
PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD
MANIFOLD TO ELL CONNECTION
"- DRIP LINE TUBING SPACE ROWS 18" O.C.
r AIRNACUUM RELIEF VALVE
NOTE:
THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE
SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RUN LENGTH.
C DRIP LINE IRREGULAR LAYOUT NOTiOSCAJ.E B
,,---------4-INCH LOCKING GRATE
~-------BUBBLER
,-------ROOT WATERING SYSTEM
---.=~-.,6--,,'7"--------FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH
__.-----CHECK VALVE
.,,------1I2-INCH STRAIGHT SPIRAL BARB FITTING
~-------1/2-INCH POLY SWING PIPE
.,,-------1/2-INCH SPIRAL BARB ELBOW
,,----12-INCH SWING ASSEMBLY
1/2-INCH MALE NPT INLET
PVC SCH 40 TEE OR EL
~-----PVC OR POLYETHYLENE LATERAL PIPE
~-------4' WIDE X 36' LONG RIGID BASKET
WEAVE CANISTER
NOTE:
1. ONCE RWS HAS BEEN INSTALLED FILL THE BASKET WITH PEA GRAVEL BEFORE LOCKING LIO.
G ROOT WATERING SYSTEM
90% CLEAN BACKFILL AS REQUIRED.
PAVING
UNDISTURBED SOIL
MAINLINE AND CONTROL
WIRES IN SCH 40 SLEEVES
LATERAL LINES IN
SCH 40 SLEEVE
K SLEEVE INSTALLATION
NOTTOSCALE
36'
©
~-----__,."MIN.
w
NOTTOSCA.LE
F
J
DRIP LINE TUBING
SPACE ROWS 18" O.C.
PVC LATERAL -
FROM DRIP
ZONE KIT
MANIFOLD TO ELL CONNECTION
PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD
AIRNACUUM RELIEF VALVE NOTE:
PVC FLUSH MANIFOLD
MANIFOLD TO ELL
CONNECTION
XFF-TEE
THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE
SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RUN LENGTH.
~------FINISHED GRADE
TOP FLUSH W/ F .G. !N TURF AREAS
TOP 112" ABOVE F.G. IN SHRUB AAEAS
SCH. 80 NIPPLE, LENGTH
ASREQU!RED
1 MARLEX STREET ELL AND
1 PVC THREADED ELL (901
SCH. 80 NIPPLE (6" MINIMUM)
MARLEX STREET ELL OUT OF LATERAL
UNEFITTING
LATERAL LINE, DEPTH AS
SPECIFIED IN LEGEND
HEAD TO BE INST All.ED
2" FROM ALL CURBING
4' FROM ALL WAJ..K'NAYS
12" FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND WALLS
SWING JOINT ASSEMBLY TO BE SIZED
PER SPRINKLER INLET SIZE
DRIP LINE TRIANGULAR LAYOUT 1/0HOS:AJ.E A POP-UP SPRAY BODY NOiTOSCALE USE ONE AIR RELIEF VALVE FOR EVERY 7 GPM PER ZONE.
LOCATE AT HIGH POINTS. RUN AIR RELIEF BLANK TUBING
LATERAL ALONG HIGH POINT OF SECTION.ATTACH ALL
DRIP TUBING TO BLANK LATERAL. MORE THAN TWO AIR
RELIEF VALVES MAY NEED TO BE INSTALLED PER SECTION.
NOTE: HEAT BRANO 'AR'
ONTO LIO IN 2' LETTERS
DRIP AIR RELIEF VALVE
NOTE: HEAT BRAND 'FV'
ONTO LID IN 2' LETTERS
PLASTIC VALVE BOX
7" RND. W/ LOCKABLE LID
FINISH GRADE
AIR RELIEFNACUUM
VALVE
ADAPTER TEE
SUBSURFACE
DRIP LINE TUBING
BRICK SUPPORTS
3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL
6"DEEP
NOTTO SCALE
PLASTIC VALVE BOX 10" RND.
W/ LOCKABLE LID
/ ~ 2" IN SHRUB AREAS
~ I FINISH GRADE
----{\i.c..-=--=--=-~~-=-~111=1=----L
PVC S X T 90"
ELL- SIZE AS
REQUIRED
LINE FLUSHING VALVE
AUTOMATIC LINE FLUSHING VALVE.
REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND.
1/2" PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE·
LENGTH AS REQUIRED.
BRICK SUPPORTS
PVC PIPE TO FLUSH MANIFOLD
N~TTOSCA!.E
E
flOTES
XFF-ELBOW
17MM BARB X BARB
90ELBOW
XF BLANK TUBING
STAKE AT 5' O.C.
-
TOP OF MULCH
r FINISH GRADE
4"
12"
XF-MA-075 -----";!,J.Ja!.
314" MPT X 17MM BARB
PVC
LA TERAUSUPPL Y
LINE
DRIP LINE MANIFOLD TO ELL CONNECTION NOTTOSCA!..E
24" WIRE COIL ANO
WATERPROOF \VIRE
CONNECTORS
PLASTIC BALL VALVE
(INCLUDED IN KIT)
r
JUMBO PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH
LOCKABLE COVER, BOX TO BE PLACED AT RIGHT
ANGLE TO HARDSCAPE EDGE
PVC SLIP UNION
(2RE0I
FILTER/ PRESSURE REGULATOR (INCLUDED IN KIT)
PVC LATERAL
L1NETO DRIP
SYSTEM
RICK
SUPPORTS
3/4'CRUSHED
GRAVEL 12' DEEP
NOTE: HEAT BRAND 'RCV' AND
CONTROL STATION#ONTO LID
IN 2M LETTERS
1 iNSTAf.LATlDN TO BE COO?tETED IN ACCC-ROAflCEVr1TH 1/N,'\JFACTURERS S?EClFICATI;)NS REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE VALVE NOTTOS"'..ALE
MELISSA LANGER [email protected]
760-815-5793
Zw
<Cu
__J z w
a..w z
zo <( <( __J u
I a::.'
otJ Ia::. <(
cc 0 ~
l-z z __J
0 w
<Co Lf) 0
N
l9~ <::t
0::: 0
0::: LL
Ll.6
6/14/2022
LANDSCAPE ----s;;::.:.;
BOULDERSTBD
r CffH?BBB[J(J9 I
i
EE/B
0 @Oo
0 0
0 0 EXIST.SCH/NUS MOLLE
@
NORTH LANE
(__COLORED\
CONCRETE J
EXIST.SCH/NUS MOUE
STONE STAIRS
ROCK COBBLE
ffi0'
(B ~ I
✓
~ <!:
UJ
z
::J
I
u
~
2 TREES
SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME QUANTITY & SIZE COMMENTS COMMON NAME BRAHEAARMATA 12 - 15 GAL SINGLE-TRUNK
MEXICAN BLUE FAN PALM
HOWEA FORSTER/ANA 7 - 6-8' B.T.H TRIPLE-TRUNK
KENTIA PALM
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN Hill' 7 - 24u SOX tv1ULT!-TRUNK
0 FRUITLESS OLIVE
0 PHOENIX ROEBELEN/f 4 - 15 GAL MULTI-TRUNK
PYGMY DATE PALM
0 CITRUS-ASSORTED DWARF 8-15 GAL STD.
SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME QTY SIZE NOTES
0 0
C)
8 0
0 0
0 0
0 D
0 @
EB
AGAVE AMERICANA
CENTURY AGAVE
AGAVE ATTENUATA 'VARIEGATA'
VARIEGATED FOXTA1LAGAVE
ALOE FEROX
CAPE ALOE
ALOE PL/CTAL/5
FAN ALOE
ALOE STR!ATA
CORAL ALOE
BOUGAINVILLEA 'BARBARA KARST'
BARBARA KARST BOUGAINVILLEA
ECHEVERIA ELEGANs· MEXICAN SNOWBALL
FICUS NITIDA
lND!AN LAUREL
FURCRAEA FOETIDA 'MEDIOPICTA'
NCN
LIGUSTRUM JAPON/CUM TEXANUM
TEXAS PRIVET
MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS
DEER GRASS
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM
MYOPORUM
PODOCARPUS GRACIL/OR
YEW PINE
SALVIA LEUCANTHA 'SANTA BARBARA'
MEXICAN SAGE
STRELITZJA JUNCEA
BIRD OF PARADISE
BIOSWALE PLANTS
D MlXOF: -CAREX PRAEGRACIUS
-FESTUCA CAUFORNICA.
-MUHLENBERGIA R1GENS
56 5 GAL
45 SGAL
38 SGAL
17 SGAL
93 lGAL
46 lGAL
32 lGAL
79 15 GAL
35 SGAL
72 15 GAL
69 lGAL
30 FLATS
46 15 GAL
58 lGAL
82 SGAL
lGALLON PLANT 18~ O.C.
EXISTING TREES TO PROTECT IN PLACE
EXIST-5CH/NUS MOLLE~
-----------SPECIES
~APPROX.DRIP
LINE
WATER USE
LOW
MODERATE/
MEDIUM
LOW
MODERATE/
MEDIUM
MODERATE/
MEDIUM
WATER USE
VERY LOW
VERY LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MATURE HEIGHT
25'-40'
40'
30'
5'-6'
10'
HEIGHT
25'-30'
6'-8'
HEDGE AT 6'
20'-40'
ALL PLANTS LOW WATER USE
seale
~
1· .. 10·-o-
./ MARK LANGER ,·,:;:,_,,:< 'MA.!;('.)f.m'ANOU:=cAPLlNC. ,,;: WCC-'<Zl:.-:¼<-2
MEUSSA LANGER MWSSAI.J.NGE?.212l@Gf,/AIL.COM
760-815-5793
w
zu
<:(Z
__J w
o_O
V)
l9~
zz
1--o
z~
<:Co
__J LL
o_
w
z
<{ <{ _j u
:r: er:::.'
b:: <{
0~
z _j
0W
Lf) 0
N
s:;:1-
LP.1
6/14/2022
0 0
o";
GOLD
COMPACTED
ROCK MULCH
STONE STAIRS
MATCH LINE B
Q .. ;z;.,·
0 tv 0 0 MULCHJ
®
0 0 p
0 V
®,
EXIST.SCH/NUS MOLLE I
I
I
I
\
\
--- ---
I
u
ii
ARTIFICIAL
TURF PUTTING
GREEN
I I
I I I (I
I
EXISTING WALL
G MUST BE SPACED AT AT A MINIMUM, 61:l~~~S. SIDE SLOPES MUST 18~ 0.C. FROM 1 RAW MATTING. HAVE REINFORCED ST I V C... I MULCH J
--------- -----------
NORTH LANE
~ ~ S' HY
LLJ
zu
<( z LJ.J
_J LLJ ~
o_O~EJ~
V) I- ex::: rnwcx::::<(
'-,/ a: 0 ~ z z _.J
Z O LJ.J
- LI) 0
1-o N
z ~ tj-
<Co
_J LL
o_
LP.2
6/14/2022
PLANTING NOTES
t ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL, COUNTY AND STATE LAWS, RULES, AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OR RELATING TO ANY PORTION OF THIS WORK ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED !NTO ANO MADE PART OF THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS; AND THE1R PROVISIONS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR. ADDITIONALLY, ALL WORK
SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE APWA, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, ("GREEN BOOK"), AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS WHENEVER SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS CONFLICT ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER, THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT, OR HIS!HER DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE, Wlll DETERMINE WHICH SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR CODES SHALL GOVERN
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTJFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA {DIG ALERT} AT LEAST N./0 (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE DIGGING, EXCAVATING, OR CONSTRUCTION, PHONE 1..S00-422-4333 OR 811.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WrlEN !T lS OBVIOUS IN THE
FIELD THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES, OR DISCREPANCIES IN AREA CONFIGURATION OR SIZES,
OR IN DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IN ENGINEERING SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS, OR
DIFFERENCES, SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER, OR HIS/HER DESIGNATED
REPRESENTATIVE IN THE EVENT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY REVISIONS NECESSARY AND SHALL PERFORM SUCH REVISIONS AT HIS/HER OWN EXPENSE
4. FINISH GRADE All PLANTING AREAS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM 2% DRAINAGE AND SMOOTH AND EVEN CONDITION, MAKING SURE THAT NO WATER POCKETS OR !RREGULAR1T!ES REMAIN, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL SURFACE STONES, ROOTS, WEEDS, DEBRIS, FOREIGN MATERIALS, CLOOS, ANO ROCKS OVER (1} INCH IN DIAMETER SO THAT AFTER COND1T!ONING AND PLANTING THE GRADE IS TWO INCHES {2") BELOW ADJACENT HARDSCAPE EXCEPT ALONG CURB CUT
AREAS CONTRACTOR IS TO ENSURE A SMOOTH TRANSITION FROM EXISTING TO NEW GRADE
5. ALL INSPECTIONS HEREIN SPECIFIED SHALL BE MADE BY THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT, OR HIS/HER DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST INSPECTION AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE TIME THE
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED
6 ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPED AREAS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDlTION AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. RESTORATION OF EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE DONE TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER
7 ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT, OR
HIS/HER DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE, BEFORE PLANTING ALL PLANT MATERIAL DELIVERED ON-SITE WILL BE INSPECTED FOR SIZE AND CONDITION OF ROOT GROvVTH, INSECTS, INJURIES, AND DEFECTS, PLANTS NOT APPROVED ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE IMMEDIATELY AND REPLACED WITH SUITABLE PLANTS. THE PARKS
SUPERINTENDENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ENTIRE LOTS OF PLANTS REPRESENTED BY DEFECTIVE SAMPLES
ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE NURSERY TAGS WHEN DELIVERED TO THE SITE 8 STAKE TREES AS INDICATED PER TREE PLANTING DETAIL
9 FINAL LOCATION OF All PLANT MATERIAL lS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT PRIOR TO
PLANTING
10 THE CONTRACTOR !S RESPONSIBLE FOR COUNT VERIFICATION ANO IS TO SUPPLY THE QUANTITIES DELINEATED
GRAPHICALLY ON PLANS
11 PLANT ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSPECTION AND
ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT, OR HIS/HER DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE PLANT
ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL BE FOR A DURATION STATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS PLANT
ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
12. SUPPLEMENTAL HAND WATERING MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO ESTABLISH PLANT
MATERIAL
13 PLACE WOOD CHIP MULCH !NALL PLANTED AREAS AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3" AS SHOWN ON PLANS. DO NOT INSTALL MULCH WITHIN A 6" 01A OF ANY TREE OR SHRUB TRUNK CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A SAMPLE MULCH FOR THE
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS AGRONOMIC SOILS TESTING NOTES:
UPON THE COMPLETION OF DEMOLITION AND GRADING ANO PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE TEN {10) SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN AT FlVE (5} SEPARATE LOCATIONS APPROVED BY THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT.
TWO (2) SOIL SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN AT EACH LOCATION:
SAMPLE ONE: TAKEN AT GROUND LEVEL TO 10" DEEP
SAMPLE TWO: TAKEN AT A DEPTH BETVVEEN 24~ TO 36".
EACH SAMPLE SHALL CONTAIN APPROXIMATELY 1 QUART OF SOIL AND BE LABELED PER LOCATION AND DEPTH.
EACH SAMPLE SHALL BE TESTED FOR SOlL FERTILITY AND AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY. SUBMIT SOIL REPORT, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS SOIL PREPARATION FOR BACKFILL M!XAND LAWN INSTALLATION.
SOIL TESTING RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED ANO APPROVED BY THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT. 2 SOIL PREPARATION AND BACKFILL MIX SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT.
3 REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOILS TESTING, SOIL PREPARATION, FERTILIZATION, MULCHING, AND OTHERADD!T!ONAL PLANTING INFORMATION. All PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PARKS SUPERINTENDENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
WEED ABATEMENT NOTES:
1 REFER TO WEED ABATEMENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. ALL WEED ABATEMENT ANO RELATED SECTIONS WILL BE ENFORCED INCLUDING TIME PERIOD REQUIREMENTS. 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING FOR ALL WATER USED FOR IRRIGATION DURING THE
WEED ABATEMENT PERIOD
3 THE WEED ASA TEMENT PERIOD SHALL PROCEED UPON THE COMPLETION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM ANO AFTER ALL WEEDS ANO GROWTH HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PLANTING AREAS PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. 4 VALVES SHALL BE WIRED TO THE CONTROLLER. !F THE CONTROLLER !SNOT INSTALLED, THE VALVE SHOULD BE CONNECTED TO A TEMPORARY !RR!GAT!ON CONTROLLER. THE TEMPORARY CONTROLLER MUST LOCATED WHERE THE FINAL CONTROLLER IS TO BE INSTALLED AS TO UTILIZING THE 1RR!GAT!ON WIRES. WITHOUT AN lRR!GAT!ON CONTROLLER
5 MAINLINE SHALL MET THE REQUIRED PRESSURE TEST PER THE SPECIFICATIONS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. THE VALVE SHALL BE FLUSHED WITHOUT NOZZLES. 6 VALVES SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL AN IRRIGATION COVERAGE TEST HAS BEEN PERFORMED BY THE
PARKS SUPERINTENDENT OR CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE 7 SO!L CONDITIONERS ANO FERTILIZERS SHALL BE MIXED INTO THE TOP S01L AT QUANTITIES ANO TYPE
RECOMMENDED PER THE AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE WEED ABATEMENT PERIOD 8 FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE WEED ABATEMENT PERIOD. --
9 ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE FREE OF UNWANTED INSECTS, RODENTS, CLODS, ROCKS, ANO LITTER PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE WEED ABATEMENT PERIOD. ---
10 ALL UNWANTED GRASSES AND WEEDS SHALL BE KILLED BY SPRAYING ANO REMOVED PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE
WEED ABATEMENT PERIOD
B
LEGEND
Q-1. 5, OR 15 GALLON SHRUB
©- MULCH PER GENERAL
PLAN11NG NOTES
G)- 3 INCH WATER BASIN
0- FINISH GRADE
©- ~~It~~~ :
0 '~/J~ TO
SOILS REPORT
©- PLANT PIT EXCAVA11ON
0- PLANT TABS - SEE
SPECIF/CA 11ON FOR
OUAN1111Y PER SHRUB ©- 0- ROOT-BALL
NA11VE SOIL
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
LEGEND
0 DUCKBILL TRff ANCHOR KIT BY
MACLEAN POl\£R SYSTEM OR
EQUIVALENT. CONTACT El\1NG
IRRIGATION GLENDALE (818)
551-9550
fo\ AMENDED BACKFILL PER SOILS
\:J REPORT
MlN 24' ,..___,.
LEGEND
0-TREA TE:D LODGE POL£ PINE TRff
ST.i\&'.'6chd1a x10feet!ongfor36" boxtree)
(3inchdm x10feet!ongfor24~box!ree)
(2inchd1a x10feetlongfor15gal.tree)
G)-71\1ST-BRACE BY V.I. T. PRODUCTS (2
PERT~J'1!" boxtree) ,;==;aa;,;="=;J;, (TB24 for 15 gal. & 24" box tree)
G)-MULCH PER GENERAL
PLAN11NG NOTES
©-r;zH ~:o~ ~~?[H B;}/;._Di
©-CONSTRUCT WA TE:R BASIN
- 3" HIGH
G)-F1NISH GRADE
(0-PLANT TABS - PLACE IN
TOP 12" OF PLAN11NG
HOLE. Sff SPECIF/CA 11ONS
FOR QUANTITY PER TREE
©-AMENDED BACKFILL PER
SOILS REPORT
0-ROOTBALL
®-NATIVE SUBGRADE
PLAN
NOTE:
SECURE TWIST-BRACE TO
TREE STAKE USING
GALVANIZED NAILS OR
S.S. WOOO SCREWS. THE
TYPE ANO SIZE OF NAILS
ANO/OR SCREWS TO BE
APPROVED BY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
A TREE STAKING AND PLANTING DETAIL (15 gal, 24", 36" box)
EDGE OF
PLANTING PIT
0 PLANT TABS - PLACE IN TOP 12"
OF PLAN11NG HOLE. SEE
SPECIF/CATIONS FOR OUAN11TY 0 fP/isW!ifcT WATER BASIN
[.--- - PVC PIPE
{fx36")
C
- 3" HIGH 0 SET TOP OF ROOT BALL 1
INCH ABOVE FINISH GRADE
0 ROOTBALL
0 NATIVE SUBGRADE
NOTE:: ATTACH GUY ll!RE
TO MAJOR TRUNKS ONLY.
TREE GUYING (48" box and larger)
"A'
CONTAINER/BOX SIZE WDTH!OIAMETER DEPTH
1GAJ.LOH
5GAUON
15GAf.J.O'l
~i/O<OOX ~ NCHSS I e;J /NCrF..S 1~
PLAN VIEW
BOX TREES CONTAINER PLANTS
@ - PLANT PIT TO BE SQUARE, SEE CHART ABOVE
FOR THE PLANT PIT DIMENSIONS
@ - PLANT PIT TO BE ROUND, SEE CHART ABOVE
FOR THE PLANT PIT DIMENSIONS.
@)-ROOTBAll @)-ROOTBALL
E PLANT PIT DIMENSIONS
PLAN
D
MIN 24" a: .;-----+,:s
!~
r- _ EDGE OF SIDEVIALK, CURB, PAVING OR 1
NAI.L ___ _
V3/0),l.__
PLAN VIEW ~PLANT MATERIAL
NOTE:
LOCATE PLANTS SPACED
EQUAL DISTANCE (D) FROM
EACH OTHER AS SHOWN.
REFER TO TH£ PLANT LEGEND
FOR DISTANCE (D).
TRIANGULAR PLANT SPACING
,~y MARK LANGER 27:, 'MA$0!.RYAMJL>.--a;oJ'C..1NC-
"',::, :.ic= .. ,-2
MEUSSA LANGER M£[email protected]
760·815~5793
V)
_J
<(
Iw
0 0
z
<(
V)
w
1-w
au
z~ w
z
WO <( <( _J u
o_ V) I a:.' f-
<(~ a:. <(
0 ~
Uz z _J
0 w
V1o Lf) 0
N
0~ s:j"
Zo
<( LJ_
_J
LP.3
6/14/2022
4250 North Lane - Project Changes
City of Solana Beach,
RECEIVED
MAY 3 1 2022
ommur .v .. :c1rfTlent Dept.
L City I., . - ,,,: .. r u ~ach; ..-J
I am writing this letter to address the plan changes that have taken place at my home located at 4250 North Lane. Below please find a breakdown of each plan with the corresponding site changes.
Changes to Grading Plan:
1. One change was the added fill to the front yard slope. In the original approval, we did not propose much grading or fill to the front yard slope because we thought it could remain in its current state.
However, after the pad area was graded it became very clear that the front yard slope posed a serious safety concern as a result of its steepness. The slope was severe, approximately 1:1 (horizontal:vertical) and dangerous enough that I wanted to prevent anyone from injuring themselves should they need to walk in front of the home. Further, the new slope, at a 2:1 slope, will promote established landscape that will help stabilize the slope from erosion.
2. Another change reflected on the current grading plan was the creation of the parking pad that was added to the side/front yard of the property. This change occurred in order to address the parking constraints that exist in the Montecillo community. Our neighborhood consists of private streets that are very narrow and difficult, if not impossible, to park on. Most homes within our community have large parking areas on their property to address the lack of street parking. The parking pad I created was intended to do the same.
3. The next change made to the grading plan was the additional grading to the slope south of the driveway and garage area of the home. The reason this area required extra grading was the need to underground the SDG&E and Spectrum power lines that crossed my property. During the grading process it was determined by SDG&E that their power line was too low and that it needed to be undergrounded. Unfortunately, although SDGE reviewed our plans as part of their plan approval process, the question of the lines was made in the field during pad grading resulting in me having to alter the slope, i.e. additional grading, in order to underground the power line.
4. Lastly, the rear and side yard slopes were altered to address the new location of the pool and outdoor patio. These changes were made during construction and were approved by staff.
Changes to Landscape Plan:
1. The modifications made from the original landscape plan to the current plan were 1) the alteration in the vegetation type, and 2) the addition of trees to the front/side yard. When the project was originally approved, my intent was to build the home for a prospective buyer.
However, as the project progressed, my family elected to move into the home instead. When I decided to keep the property for my family, I changed some of the plant types and added more trees to the front/side area of the property. When adding the trees, I did not believe it would pose a problem since the added trees were in locations that would not affect any of my neighbors' properties nor their views. I felt the changes were minimal in nature and that they could be addressed through my "as built changes." It is now my understanding that City staff does not have the authority to approve tree additions, which is why I am seeking approval herein.
Changes to Patio & Pool:
1. The outdoor patio and pool area were modified because the original location of the outdoor patio was too close in proximity to the home and created an unsightly and dysfunctional use of the backyard. Unfortunately, I did not realize a change was needed until the foundation was chalked and the backyard pool/outdoor patio area were measured out. Once this issue was identified, a plan change was submitted and approved by staff.
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the plan changes as described above.
Thank you,
Brad Fomon
4250 North Lane
Del Mar CA 92014
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.1.
STAFF REPORT
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: June 22, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Engineering Department
SUBJECT: Update Report on Safe Routes to School Master Plan BACKGROUND:
The Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program was created to support the California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans) Mission: Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California’s economy and livability.
In October 2019, the City submitted a grant application to Caltrans through the Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program for a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Master Plan. The grant project amount submitted by the City was $220,000, which included $165,000 in grant funds that would be reimbursed by Caltrans and $55,000 in matching funds to be provided by the City. A statewide total of 178 grant applications were submitted that totaled approximately $54 million. A total of 77 applications were selected for grant awards, totaling approximately $21.5 million. In June 2020, the City was notified that our grant proposal was accepted for full funding. A grant agreement was executed with Caltrans in October 2020 and a Notice to Proceed was issued by Caltrans in November 2020.
This item is before the City Council to provide an update on the SRTS Master Plan and receive comments and direction from the City Council.
DISCUSSION:
The City, with assistance from the City’s Traffic Engineering firm of Chen Ryan and associates, is in the process of developing a SRTS Master Plan. The overall project objectives are:
June 22, 2022
Safe Routes to School Update
• Provide safer, more comfortable walking and bicycling options for Solana Beach schoolchildren, their families, and residents.
• Promote walking and bicycling as a way to improve health. • Reduce emissions of greenhouse gases related to vehicle travel by increasing the number of Solana Beach children, their families, and residents who choose to walk or bicycle to, from, and around the schools.
• Identify safety, infrastructure, and programmatic barriers to walking and bicycling to, from, and around the schools.
• Identify prioritized infrastructure and programs based on needs and best practices.
The SRTS Master Plan focuses on walking and biking around eight school/project sites, which include:
• Skyline Elementary School
• Solana Vista Elementary School
• Earl Warren Middle School
• Santa Fe Christian Academy
• St. James Academy
• LePort Montessori
• Fusion Academy
• Boys and Girls Club of San Dieguito
In the summer of 2021, the SRTS project kicked off. The project scope included development of an outreach and engagement plan, development of the project website and questionnaire, and conducted mobility assessments at the eight school/project sites, three outreach events, and three public meetings/workshops. The result of this effort will be a SRTS Master Plan that highlights gaps in the walking and bicycling environment near these eight sites.
In June 2021, the City introduced the project objectives to the School Relations Committee to gain support and share information about the project’s timeline. The City developed an online questionnaire and project website to promote the project to the broader community. Specific to the project sites, the City created a SRTS toolkit that included free promotional materials including flyers, postcards and requested participation through an online questionnaire and student tally. These toolkits were provided to encourage walking and biking in the Solana Beach community and to collect data. The SRTS Master Plan study was again presented to the School Relations Committee in September 2021 and to the San Diego County SRTS Coalition and BikeWalkSolana in December 2021 (all meetings were conducted virtually).
In the fall of 2021, eight school-based mobility assessments were conducted in close collaboration with the school administrators as part of the planning process. These school-based mobility assessments looked at the streets and intersections in the vicinity and immediately adjacent to each of the eight school/project sites. Additionally, the June 22, 2022
Safe Routes to School Update
consultant team conducted a walking audit of the areas surrounding the project sites to assess the immediate areas for any walking and biking challenges.
Due to restrictions placed on public gatherings related to the COVID-19 pandemic, community outreach other than the school-based mobility assessments was suspended until spring 2022. The first in-person community outreach was conducted at Fiesta Del Sol on May 20 and 21, 2022. Approximately 50 questionnaires were collected. To date, approximately 200 questionnaires have been collected related to this project. Some of the most commonly noted concerns among the responses collected include:
• Gaps in sidewalks and missing sidewalks in neighborhood areas that lead to schools.
• Concerns about people driving too fast along Lomas Santa Fe Drive. • Concerns about the long crossing distances and lack of visibility for youth on City streets.
• Students biking on the sidewalk.
The results of the initial phase of the SRTS Master Plan are summarized in Attachment 1 to this Staff Report. This information identifies gaps and needed enhancements in the City’s circulation network surrounding each school/project site. The recommended enhancements are consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategies (CATS) Program, the Lomas Santa Fe Corridor Improvement Project and the City’s on-going Complete Streets objectives. Staff will present these recommendations at the Council meeting and will seek Council’s input and direction.
The next steps for the project are to conduct broader community outreach in the form of a public workshop, joint public works/school district meeting, and City Council meetings.
These outreach events are intended to inform the community and stakeholders about the recommendations of the program and to seek feedback in preparation of the draft SRTS Master Plan for the City Council’s approval. A draft of the SRTS Master Plan is anticipated for completion in late 2022. According to the terms of the grant agreement with Caltrans, all activity associated with the grant must be completed by February 28, 2023.
CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:
Preparation of a SRTS Master Plan is not a project under CEQA. Environmental review will be addressed prior to City Council approval to advertise construction bids for any construction projects identified in the SRTS Master Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are no fiscal impacts associated with this SRTS Update Staff Report. The Master Plan study has been fully funded. The project total is $220,000, which includes $165,000 in grant funds that will be reimbursed by Caltrans and $55,000 in matching funds provided by the City. The City’s matching funds are provided with the City’s share of TransNet June 22, 2022
Safe Routes to School Update
funding. Any construction project identified in the SRTS Master Plan would have funding identified before a construction contract is awarded.
WORK PLAN:
This project is consistent with Item B.13 of the Community Character Priorities of the Draft FY 2022/23 Work Plan.
OPTIONS:
• Receive report.
• Provide direction/feedback.
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive this Staff Report and provide direction to Staff as needed.
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:
1. SRTS Draft Recommendations
![
![
![
![
![
![
![
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
![
ÆÅ
![
ÆÅ ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ ÆÅ
Sante Fe Christian (K-12)
Skyline Elementary (K-6)
Earl Warren Middle (7-8)
&
Solana Beach
Library
Skyline
Elementary (K-6)
Sante Fe
Christian
(K-12)
Boys & Girls Clubs of San Dieguito Boys & Girls Clubs
of San Dieguito
Earl Warren
Middle (7-8)
&
Solana Beach
Library Stevens Av
S. N
ard
o
Av
G
el ncr
est Dr
S. Granados Av
E. Cliff St
N. Rios Av
Glenmont Dr
N. Granados Av
San Rodolfo
Dr
Dell St
Hilmen Dr
El Viento
Academy Dr
Genevieve St
Solana Hills Dr
Id
a
Ave
Corto St
§¨¦5
Lomas Santa Fe Dr
!"$
!"$ !"$
ëìíª
!"$
ëìíª
!"$
ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª
!"$
ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª
!"$
!"$
!"$
1 3
4 5
6 7
7 7
7 8
8 8
8 9
11 11
12 12
12 12
11 11
11 11
13 13
13 13
13 11
11 14
14 14
15 16
17 8
2 13
10 N
° LEGEND
Existing Infrastructure
Recommendations
Place Crossing
Guard
Install Class IV /
Bollard
Construct DG Path
Install Conflict Paint
at Driveway
Construct Curb
Extension
Widen Sidewalk
Install High Visibility
Crosswalk
Narrow Driveway
Install No Parking
Any Time Signage
Construct Bicycle
& Walking Crossing
Install Audible
Signal
Construct Bulb
Out & Crosswalk
Install Shared Lane
Marking (Class III)
Denote On-Street
Parking
Install ADA Curb
Ramp
Create Protected
Curb Approach
Construct Sidewalk
5 6
3 9
4 1 10
7 2
8 11
17 12
15 16
13 14
ÅÆÄ School Signage
![ Bike Parking
!"$ All-Way Stop
Traffic Signal
School Site
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADA Compliant
Ramp
Class IV - Protected
Bikeway
Class II - Bike Lane
Class III - Bike Route
Crossing Gaurd
Location
Rectangular RapidFlashing Beacons
#
#
From Lomas Santa Fe Plan
From CATS Plan
Boys & Girls Clubs of San Dieguito, Earl
Warren Middle, Skyline Elementary,
and Santa Fe Christian - SRTS
Recommendations
Feature Qt./Mi. Feature Qt./Mi.
Narrow Driveway 1 Crossing Gaurd 1
No Parking Signage 1 Class IV 0.88
miles
Bicycle & Walking Crossing 1 DG Path 900 ft.
Audible Signal 1 Conflict Paint Dwy Locations 6
Bulb Out & Crosswalk 1 Curb Extension 6
Shared Lane Marking 4 Widen Sidewalk 275 ft.
On-Street Parking Signage 4 High-Visibility Crosswalk 1 ADA Curb Ramp 15 Protected Curb Approach 1
Sidewalk 150 ft.
D
,·'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ ------------------------------1 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•, (fi
' i';111
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
(1111111n
I
I
I
I
:-------"'
I I : ~-------- --------------- ' --. I
\
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0,1111 <:::i
~
-::::
=
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---...., I .......... /
---
~
1111
r - - - - 'I
I I
I I
I
I
. ----.
-~
• m
~
._,
• 10•
·-
·-
•
-~
•
•
• ■
I
•
•
·-
••
·-
• O
•
•
- -
![
![
![
![
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÆÅ ÆÅ
Earl Warren
Boys & Girls Clubs
of San Dieguito
Boys & Girls Clubs
of San Dieguito
Earl Warren
St
eve
n
s
Av
S. N
a
rd
o
Av
G
el ncr
e
s
t
D
S. Granados
A
E. Cliff St
Glenmont Dr
N. Granados Av
San Rodolfo
Dr
Hilmen Dr
El Viento
Lomas Santa Fe Dr
!"$
!"$ !"$
ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª
!"$
1 3
4 5
11 11
12 12
12 11
11 11
11 13
13 13
13 11
11 14
14 16
17 8
10 ![
![
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ ÆÅ
ÆÅ
![
ÆÅ
![
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
Earl Warren
St
eve
n
s
Av
G
el n
c
r
e
s
t
D
E. Cliff St
Gle
n
m
o
n
t
Dr
N. Gra
n
a
d
o
s
Av
San Rodolfo
Dr
Lomas Santa Fe Dr
! !
ëìª
ëìª
ëìª
4 !
12 12
11 11
11 11
13 13
11 11
17 8
10 N
° LEGEND
Existing Infrastructure
Recommendations
Place Crossing
Guard
Install Class IV /
Bollard
Construct DG Path
Install Conflict Paint
at Driveway
Construct Curb
Extension
Widen Sidewalk
Install High Visibility
Crosswalk
Narrow Driveway
Install No Parking
Any Time Signage
Construct Bicycle
& Walking Crossing
Install Audible
Signal
Construct Bulb
Out & Crosswalk
Install Shared Lane
Marking (Class III)
Denote On-Street
Parking
Install ADA Curb
Ramp
Create Protected
Curb Approach
Construct Sidewalk
5 6
3 9
4 1 10
7 2
8 11
17 12
15 16
13 14
ÅÆÄ School Signage
![ Bike Parking
!"$ All-Way Stop
Traffic Signal
School Site
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADA Compliant
Ramp
Class IV - Protected
Bikeway
Class II - Bike Lane
Class III - Bike Route
Crossing Gaurd
Location
Rectangular RapidFlashing Beacons
#
#
From Lomas Santa Fe Plan
From CATS Plan
Boys & Girls Clubs of San Dieguito - SRTS
Recommendations
Feature Qt./Mi. Feature Qt./Mi.
Narrow Driveway 1 Crossing Gaurd --
No Parking Signage -- Class IV 0.26
miles
Bicycle & Walking Crossing 1 DG Path ~ 50 ft.
Audible Signal -- Conflict Paint Dwy Locations 2
Bulb Out & Crosswalk 1 Curb Extension 5
Shared Lane Marking -- Widen Sidewalk --
On-Street Parking Signage -- High-Visibility Crosswalk 1 ADA Curb Ramp -- Protected Curb Approach --
Sidewalk --
u
t'*i --t),,?J
.,,,..,,,. .,,,. .,,,. .,,,. .,,,. .,,,. .,,,. .,,,. .,,,. -~ .,,,..,,,. -- ~-- I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
♦'
Middle (7-8)
&
Solana Beach
Library
<:::i
<:::i
1111
-~
. , . m
~
._, • 10•
·-
·-
• II
-~
•
•
• ■
I
•
•
·-
••
·-
• O
•
•
-
![
![
![
![
![
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
![
![
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
Sante Fe
tian
2)
e
ary
Earl Warren
Middle (7-8)
&
Solana Beach
Library
e
ary
Sante Fe
tian
2)
s
Earl Warren
Middle (7-8)
&
Solana Beach
Library St
eve
n
s
Av
G
el ncr
e
s
t
D
r
San Rodolfo
Dr
Hilmen Dr
Solana Hills D
§¨¦5
Lomas Santa Fe Dr
ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª
!"
ëìíª
!"$
1 4
6 7
11 11
12 12
12 11
11 11
11 13
13 13
13 13
11 11
14 15
16 17
8 2
13 10
![
![
ÆÅ ÆÅ
ÆÅ ÆÅ
ÆÅ ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ ÆÅ
e
ary
Sante Fe
tian
2)
s
D
r
Hilmen Dr
Solana Hills D
¨¦§
Fe Dr
ëìª
!
ëìª
!
1 6 7
11 11
12 12
11 11
13 13
13 13
13 14
15 16
N
° LEGEND
Existing Infrastructure
Recommendations
Place Crossing
Guard
Install Class IV /
Bollard
Construct DG Path
Install Conflict Paint
at Driveway
Construct Curb
Extension
Widen Sidewalk
Install High Visibility
Crosswalk
Narrow Driveway
Install No Parking
Any Time Signage
Construct Bicycle
& Walking Crossing
Install Audible
Signal
Construct Bulb
Out & Crosswalk
Install Shared Lane
Marking (Class III)
Denote On-Street
Parking
Install ADA Curb
Ramp
Create Protected
Curb Approach
Construct Sidewalk
5 6
3 9
4 1 10
7 2
8 11
17 12
15 16
13 14
ÅÆÄ School Signage
![ Bike Parking
!"$ All-Way Stop
Traffic Signal
School Site
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADA Compliant
Ramp
Class IV - Protected
Bikeway
Class II - Bike Lane
Class III - Bike Route
Crossing Gaurd
Location
Rectangular RapidFlashing Beacons
#
#
From Lomas Santa Fe Plan
From CATS Plan
Earl Warren Middle - SRTS
Recommendations
Feature Qt./Mi. Feature Qt./Mi.
Narrow Driveway -- Crossing Gaurd 1
No Parking Signage 1 Class IV 0.34
miles
Bicycle & Walking Crossing -- DG Path ~ 150 ft.
Audible Signal 1 Conflict Paint Dwy Locations 1
Bulb Out & Crosswalk -- Curb Extension --
Shared Lane Marking -- Widen Sidewalk --
On-Street Parking Signage -- High-Visibility Crosswalk -- ADA Curb Ramp 4 Protected Curb Approach 1
Sidewalk --
Boys & Girls Club ___ .-
of San Dieguito _ - - ;
-- ----"' ~ -----
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,♦
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
\
\
' ',
---------------
~"' \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
'C7
r-------~ ---- I \ ---
I I ' .. ---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ct
(
<:::i
<:::i
1111
•
e i
•
•
·-
••
·-
• O
•
•
- -
![
![
![
![
![
![
![
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
![
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
e Fe
tian
2)
Skyline
Elementary (K-6)
Skyline
Elementary (K-6)
e Fe
tian
2)
St
eve
n
s
Av
G
el ncr
e
s
t
Dr
San Rodolfo
Dr
Dell St
Solana Hills Dr
§¨¦5
Lomas Santa Fe Dr
ëìíª
!"$
ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª ëìíª
ëìíª
ëìíª
!"$
!"$
1 4
8 8
12 12
12 11
11 11
11 13
13 13
13 11
11 14
15 17
8 13
10 ![ ![
![
ÆÅ ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
![
ÆÅ ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ ÆÅ
e Fe
tian
2)
St
eve
n
s
Av
San Rodolfo
Dr
¨¦§
ëìª
ëìª
ëìª
!
!
1 4
12 11
11 13
11 11
17 8
13 N
° LEGEND
Existing Infrastructure
Recommendations
Place Crossing
Guard
Install Class IV /
Bollard
Construct DG Path
Install Conflict Paint
at Driveway
Construct Curb
Extension
Widen Sidewalk
Install High Visibility
Crosswalk
Narrow Driveway
Install No Parking
Any Time Signage
Construct Bicycle
& Walking Crossing
Install Audible
Signal
Construct Bulb
Out & Crosswalk
Install Shared Lane
Marking (Class III)
Denote On-Street
Parking
Install ADA Curb
Ramp
Create Protected
Curb Approach
Construct Sidewalk
5 6
3 9
4 1 10
7 2
8 11
17 12
15 16
13 14
ÅÆÄ School Signage
![ Bike Parking
!"$ All-Way Stop
Traffic Signal
School Site
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADA Compliant
Ramp
Class IV - Protected
Bikeway
Class II - Bike Lane
Class III - Bike Route
Crossing Gaurd
Location
Rectangular RapidFlashing Beacons
#
#
From Lomas Santa Fe Plan
From CATS Plan
Skyline Elementary - SRTS
Recommendations
Feature Qt./Mi. Feature Qt./Mi.
Narrow Driveway -- Crossing Gaurd 1
No Parking Signage -- Class IV 0.28
miles
Bicycle & Walking Crossing -- DG Path 700 ft.
Audible Signal -- Conflict Paint Dwy Locations 3
Bulb Out & Crosswalk -- Curb Extension 1
Shared Lane Marking -- Widen Sidewalk 275 ft.
On-Street Parking Signage -- High-Visibility Crosswalk -- ADA Curb Ramp 6 Protected Curb Approach --
Sidewalk --
~
Earl Warren
M1ddl (7-8)
&
Solana Beach
Library
r---------
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
'
cm I
------------------
---
---.. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,r-------.. I \
, ~-------- ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
0 'C7
------- -------- ---.. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
flit ..
~
<:::i
<:::i
1111
l
t
-~
. ,. m
~
._, • 10•
·-
·-
• "
-~
•
•
• ■
I
•
•
·-
••
·-
• O
•
•
-
![
![
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
Sante Fe
Christian
(K-12)
Sante Fe
Christian
(K-12)
St
eve
n
s
Av
San Rodolfo
Dr
Academy Dr
Genevieve St
Id
a
Av
e
§¨¦5
ëìíª
ëìíª
!"
!"$
4 6 7
7 7
7 8
8 9
11 11
8 ![
![
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
St
eve
n
s
Av
San Rodolfo
Dr
¨¦§
ëìª
!
!
4 11
11 8
N
° LEGEND
Existing Infrastructure
Recommendations
Place Crossing
Guard
Install Class IV /
Bollard
Construct DG Path
Install Conflict Paint
at Driveway
Construct Curb
Extension
Widen Sidewalk
Install High Visibility
Crosswalk
Narrow Driveway
Install No Parking
Any Time Signage
Construct Bicycle
& Walking Crossing
Install Audible
Signal
Construct Bulb
Out & Crosswalk
Install Shared Lane
Marking (Class III)
Denote On-Street
Parking
Install ADA Curb
Ramp
Create Protected
Curb Approach
Construct Sidewalk
5 6
3 9
4 1 10
7 2
8 11
17 12
15 16
13 14
ÅÆÄ School Signage
![ Bike Parking
!"$ All-Way Stop
Traffic Signal
School Site
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADA Compliant
Ramp
Class IV - Protected
Bikeway
Class II - Bike Lane
Class III - Bike Route
Crossing Gaurd
Location
Rectangular RapidFlashing Beacons
#
#
From Lomas Santa Fe Plan
From CATS Plan
Santa Fe Christian - SRTS
Recommendations
Feature Qt./Mi. Feature Qt./Mi.
Narrow Driveway -- Crossing Gaurd --
No Parking Signage -- Class IV --
Bicycle & Walking Crossing -- DG Path --
Audible Signal -- Conflict Paint Dwy Locations --
Bulb Out & Crosswalk -- Curb Extension --
Shared Lane Marking 4 Widen Sidewalk --
On-Street Parking Signage 4 High-Visibility Crosswalk -- ADA Curb Ramp 5 Protected Curb Approach --
Sidewalk 150 ft.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 00
r-------
1 ~ ------------------- ' ' ---- ------.. I " - I
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ----------...._ I .....
";
'
<:::i
<:::i
1111
-~
. ,. m
~
._, • 10•
·-
·-
• II
-~
•
•
• ■
I
•
•
·-
••
·-
• O
•
•
- -
![
Steve
ns Av
Val el y
Av
Id
a
Av
City
of
San Diego
St. James Academy (K-8)St. James
Academy (K-8)
City
of
Del Mar
Via De La Valle
Fusion Academy
(K -12)
Fusion Academy
(K -12)
Solana Gate
Jim
my Du ar nte Bl
§¨¦5
Pimlico Dr
Del Mar Downs Rd
E
Solana Cir
Solana Cir
Highland D r
ëìíª
ëìíª
!"$
ëìíª
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
3 4
LEGEND
N
°
Existing Infrastructure
Recommendations
Install No Parking
Any Time Signage
Construct Bulb Out
& Crosswalk
Install Buffered
Bike Lane
Install Conflict Paint at
Driveway & Intersection
3 4
1 2
!"$ All-Way Stop
Traffic Signal
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADA Compliant Ramp
School Site
Class II - Bike Lane
Feature Qt./
Mi.
Buffered Bike Lane 0.68
miles
Conflict Paint 5
Bulb Out / Crosswalk 1
No Parking Signage 1
Fusion Academy - SRTS Recommendations
------. ,, I r-----• I
I I
I I
I I
I ,' I ____ ,
I ; ',, ,' ', .......
..........
r-·-·
i
i
i
I
i
i
i
i
i
i ---- c? i '
·----- ~ ---...I ·------~ - = ~ = ~ = ~ :0 ~ 11111111
(}111,0
~
~
1111
·----~
I I
I I
I I
~----..
·-
•
·-
• '"' 2E
![
![
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
![
La Colonia ÆÅ
Park
Stevens Av
Val el y
Av
S. N
ard
o
Av
S. Rios Av
S. C
edros Av
S. Gra
n
a
d
os Av
Rosa St
E. Solana
Cir
St. James
Academy (K-8)
St. James
Academy (K-8)
W. Solana
Cir
Nardito Ln
Peppertree L n
Fresca
St
Bell Ranch Rd
!"
!"$
!"$
!"$
ëìíª
ëìíª
1 4
2 3 4
1 5
5 5
5 5
5 6
7 LEGEND
N
°
Existing Infrastructure
Recommendations
Traffic Signal
Install Rectangle
Rapid Flash Beacon
Install ADA Curb Ramp
Construct Decomposed
Granite Path
Install High Visibility
Crosswalk
3 4
1 2
Feature Qt./
Mi.
Sidewalk 0.29
miles
High-Visibility Crosswalk 1
ADA Curb Ramp 4
Decomposed Granite
Path
0.27 miles
![
!"$
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADACompliant
Ramp
Bike Parking
All-Way Stop
ÅÆÄ School
Signage
School Site
Park
Class II
Bike Lane
Class III
Bike Route
Install Shared Lane
Marking (Class III) 5
Construct Curb
Extension 6
Construct Raised
Median 7
#
#
From Solana Highlands Plan
From Ocean Ranch Estates Plan
St. James Academy - SRTS Recommendations
,-----i r----•' I
I I
I I
I I
I I
~ I ' ;----,' ', I ........... .,,.,
\) C D
--------, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 <:)
<:)
1111
•
·-
-~
•
·-
·-
• •
•
![
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄÅÆÄ
![
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÆÅ
ÅÆ
Solana Vista
Elementary (K-3)
Solana Vista
Elementary (K-3)
Santa Helena
Santa Rosita
Santa Victoria
Sun Val ley Rd
Sa
nta
Carina
Santa Florencia
Santa Estella
Santa Dominga
Santa Cecelia
Santa Bartola
Santa Alicia
San Patricio
Sa
nta
Helena
City of Encinitas
!"$
!"$
!"$
!"$
1 1
2 2
1 3
4 4
4 4
5 6
6 7
5 5
LEGEND
N
°
Existing Infrastructure
Construct Curb
Extension 5
Install Two-Way Class
IV / Bollards 6
Install ADA Curb
Ramp 3
Construct Multi-Use
Path 4
Install High Visibility
Crosswalk 1
Construct Bicycle &
Walking Crossing 7
Install Shared Lane
Marking (Class III) 2
Feature Qt./
Mi.
High-Visibility Crosswalk 6
Shared Lane Marking 10
ADA Curb Ramp 8
Multi-Use Path 0.45
miles
Curb Extension 9
Two-Way Class IV 0.25
miles
Bicycle and Walking
Crossing 1
![
!"$
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADACompliant
Ramp
Bike Parking
All-Way Stop
ÅÆÄ School
Signage
School Site
Class II
Bike Lane
Class III
Bike Route
Recommendations
Solana Vista Elementary - SRTS Recommendations
r,\\\~
~- ~
~ ,~-~----------~ ~~ ,, I
.;1{' I .,."'OU I
.,/ A : ., I
/ '
<) I '
'--> ,' ,' I I
I I
I I
~ ,' I ,'
I /
I /
------ I ------------- I I -----'
d D
<C::\
t::;,
=
i
i
i i--- -----
i
i
i
i
.. ~
~----.. I I
I I
I I
"----~
1111
![ ![
![
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
ÅÆÄ
La Colonia
Park
Genevieve St
Val el y
Av
Academy Dr
Ida Av
San Andres Dr
Las B
a
nderas Dr
M
ar ni e
V
ei w
Av
Le Port
Montessori (K-6)
Le Port
Montessori (K-6)
Sante Fe Christian (K-12)Sante Fe
Christian
(K-12)
§¨¦5
Solana Dr
San Rodo lfo Dr
M
arin
e
View
Av
!"$
!"$
$!"
1 1
2 3
3 3
4 5
5 6
7 LEGEND
N
°
Existing Infrastructure
Recommendations
![
!"$
Marked Crosswalk
Ramp
ADACompliant
Ramp
Bike Parking
All-Way Stop
ÅÆÄ School
Signage
School Site
Park
Class II
Bike Lane
$!"
Place Speed Feedback
Signage
Construct Decomposed
Granite Path
Install Rectangular
Rapid-Flashing Beacons
Install Watch for
Pedestrians Signage
Make All-Way Stop*
*Subject to engineering analysis
Install Shared Lane
Marking (Class III)
Construct Sidewalk
5 6
3 4
1 7
2 Feature Qt./
Mi.
Sidewalk 675 ft.
All-Way Stop 1
Pedestrian Signage 3
Speed Feedback
Signage 1
Shared Lane Marking 12
Decomposed Granite
Path 300 ft.
Rectangular RapidFlashing Beacon 1
Le Port Montessori - SRTS Recommendations
-----\ -------- ~, -- I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ·--------------------- ',,,
On()
'2'
,5
<:) rJ,,ro
;::
~ r----,
I I <:) I I
I I
I I ·----"
.. ----" 1111 I I
I I
I I
I I
·----·
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.2.
STAFF REPORT
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: June 22, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager’s Office
SUBJECT: FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program Awards
BACKGROUND:
On May 4, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2004-68 approving Council Policy No. 14 establishing the Community Grant Program (“Grant Program”) and Application Guidelines for the Grant Program.
At the March 9, 2022 City Council meeting, the City Council authorized the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 Community Grant Program. The FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget contains an appropriation in the amount of $25,000 to fund the Community Grants Program. Included in the $25,000 appropriation is a $15,000 contribution from EDCO as part of the community enhancement efforts through the solid waste Franchise Agreement with the City.
At the June 8, 2022 City Council meeting, the grant applicants gave presentations on their respective program requests. There are a total of twelve (12) applications for a maximum funding request of $49,770.
This item is before the City Council to select the FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program recipients.
DISCUSSION:
The following twelve (12) applications were received by the City (in alphabetical order):
June 22, 2022
FY 2022/23 Community Grants Program Awards
Applicant Amount Requested
Assistance League Rancho San Dieguito $3,000
BikeWalkSolana* $2,000
Boys and Girls Club of San Dieguito $5,000
Casa De Amistad $5,000
Community Resource Center $2,500
Disconnect Collective, Inc. $5,000
La Colonia Community Foundation $5,000
North Coast Repertory Theatre $5,000
Pathways to Citizenship $5,000
Rancho Santa Fe Youth Soccer $2,270
Solana Beach Civic & Historical Society $5,000
San Diego Organizing Project $5,000
Total $49,770
*This application came in after the solicitation date but was approved by Council to be included As noted in the footnote to the table above, the City did receive a late appication from BikeWalkSolana for a $2,000 grant request. The Council, at the June 8, 2022 Council Meeting, approved allowing the late application into the submittals for consideration of an award. The complete applications, absent the BikeWalkSolana application that was submitted as a Blue Folder item prior to the Council Meeting, were included in a separate attachment that was distributed to Council prior to the June 8, 2022 City Council meeting. The City’s FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget contains an appropriation in the amount of $25,000 to be used to fund community grants. In past years, the Council has authorized an additional $5,000 from the Reserve Public Arts Account to be used to fund the North Coast Repertory Theatre grant application.
Santa Fe Christian (SFC) Schools Cooperation
Ten years ago, the City and SFC created a unique partnership to more efficiently and effectively assist the non-profit organizations that specifically serve the La Colonia de Eden Gardens community. This partnership, which has included a contribution ranging from $10,000 - $25,000 from SFC in past years, has allowed both the City and SFC to maximize their limited resources to provide the most benefit for this underserved population. SFC has confirmed their generous contribution amount of $25,000 for this year’s partnership.
CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:
Not a project as defined by CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget contains an appropriation in the amount of $25,000 to be used to fund community grants, subject to the City Council’s discretion. The appropriation is budgeted in the Contribution to Other Agencies expenditure account in the City Council budget unit.
June 22, 2022
FY 2022/23 Community Grants Program Awards
In past years, the Council has authorized an additional $5,000 from the Reserve Public Arts Account to be used to fund the North Coast Repertory Theatre grant application.
If Council approves the additional $5,000 from the Reserve Public Arts Account to be used, the funding breakdown would be as follows:
City’s FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget - $25,000
Public Arts Reserve Account - $ 5,000
Santa Fe Christian Schools - $25,000
Total - $55,000
The total funding request for the FY 2022/23 Community Grant cycle is $49,770, which is less than the potential available funds listed above.
WORK PLAN:
N/A
OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff recommendation
• Approve Staff recommendation with modifications
• Deny Staff recommendation and provide direction
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Select the FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program recipients and identify an award amount to each recipient.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-080 (Attachment 1) authorizing the funding for the selected community grant applicants for financial assistance under the FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program.
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:
1. Resolution 2022-080
RESOLUTION 2022-080
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL
FUNDING FOR SELECTED COMMUNITY GRANT RECIPIENTS
FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE FISCAL YEAR (FY)
2022/23 COMMUNITY GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the offering of the FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program for community service organizations who seek program financial assistance at its March 9, 2022 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the allocation of $30,000 for the purpose of funding the FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program in the FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the allocation of $5,000 from the Public Art Reserve account for the purpose of funding the FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program in the FY 2022/23 Adopted Budget; and
WHEREAS, Santa Fe Christian Schools Cooperation has generously confirmed a contribution of $25,000 for the FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received Requests for Financial Assistance for the FY 2022/23 Community Grant Program, reviewed all applications, and has determined the selection of the FY 2022/23 grant recipients and award amounts pursuant to Council Policy No. 14 (Policy).
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the Council has reviewed all FY 2022/23 Community Grant requests and has determined the selection of the FY 2022/23 grant recipients and award amounts pursuant to Council Policy No. 14, which shall not exceed a total of $60,000 from all funding sources.
3. That the grant recipients, award amounts and funding sources for the FY 2022/23 Community Grant program shall be as indicated on Attachment 1 hereto, which is fully incorporated herein by this reference.
4. That these actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June, 2022, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
Resolution 2022-080
FY 2022-23 Grant Recipients
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.3.
STAFF REPORT
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: June 22, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance
SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of Resolution 2022-082 Adopting Adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adopted Budget.
BACKGROUND:
On June 23, 2021, the City Council (Council) approved the Fiscal Years (FYs) 2021-22 and 2022- 23 Annual Budgets. During the course of any year and at the end of each fiscal year, as new budgetary information becomes available, Staff presents that information to the Council for consideration when adjustments are recommended to the Adopted Budget.
This item is before the City Council for consideration of Resolution 2022-082 (Attachment 1) adopting amendments to the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget.
DISCUSSION:
The City of Solana Beach’s (City) Operating Budget Policies state that total expenditures of a particular fund may not exceed that which is appropriated by the City Council without a budget amendment. In addition, Section 3.08.040 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code limits the purchases by departments within the total departmental budget appropriations.
Staff is recommending the City Council authorize the Finance Director/City Treasurer to amend the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget for certain revenue and expenditure appropriations. Specific amendments to the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget are discussed below in detail and categorized by General Fund and other funds.
Furthermore, the City conducted a Community Survey to assess resident City service needs and priorities. Respondents to the survey identified the following City service priorities:
• Maintaining local streets and repairing potholes, storm drains, and other infrastructure • Providing quick responses to 911 emergencies, fire protection and paramedic services • Keeping trash and pollution out of local waterways and off our beaches June 22, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Update Amendments
• Keeping neighborhoods, parks, and other public areas safe and clean • Managing traffic congestion
• Reducing property related crimes and theft
These community priorities are very much in line with the City’s budget spending priorities specifically those for public safety and public works services including street and pothole repair and construction and maintenance of our storm drain infrastructure.
General Fund Amendments
General Fund – Revenues
Staff has analyzed revenues received by the City through May 2022. A trend analysis was performed to compare actual receipts received versus the annual budget. Any significant variances were analyzed in detail and projected through the next fiscal year. In a few cases, budget adjustments are being recommended based on other separate analyses or projections.
General Fund Amendments – Revenues
• Property Tax
Collections for Property Tax continues to grow with the San Diego housing market.
Projections by HDL Coren & Cone, the City’s property tax consultant, show an estimated increase for FY 23 of 7.97% in Taxable Value in Solana Beach. Staff is recommending Property Tax revenue be increased by $215,000 from $9,235,000 to $9,450,000. • Real Property Transfer Tax
Real Property Transfer Tax also continues to grow with the local housing market. Staff is recommending Real Property Transfer Tax revenue be increased by $115,000 from $210,000 to $325,000.
• Motor Vehicle License Fee (MVLF) Revenue
HDL Coren & Cone has estimated that MVLF revenue will increase 7.93% in FY 23.
Staff is recommending MVLF revenue be increased by $84,200 from $1,945,800 to $2,030,000.
• Sales Tax
Collections of Sales Tax revenue continue to rebound from previous year lows. Staff met with HDL advisors, who are projecting a continued growth in FY 23. Based on information from HDL, Staff is recommending Sales Tax revenue be increased by $588,000 from $3,707,600 to $4,286,000.
• Short-Term Vacation Rentals
The City has experienced higher than originally projected TOT from short-term vacation rentals. Due to this, Staff is recommending short-term vacation rental TOT revenue be increased by $165,000 from $485,000 to $650,000.
• Building Permits Revenue
Due to a high volume of permit activity, Staff is proposing a budget increase to the Building Permits category of $75,500. This adjustment would increase Building Permit budgeted revenue from $310,000 to $385,000.
June 22, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Update Amendments
• Business Registration
Following two years of waived Business Certificate renewal fees, the City implemented the previously approved renewal increases in 2022. Based on the trend analysis and certificate renewals received during the 2022 renewal period, Staff is proposing an increase of $100,000 to the Business Registration revenue category. This adjustment would increase the budgeted revenue from $125,000 to $225,000. • Interest Revenue
The adopted budget included $178,000 for interest revenue that would be received on its investments held with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and Chandler Asset Management. Due to an improved interest rate environment, Staff is recommending interest revenue be increased by $60,000 to $238,000.
• Planning Application & Public Hearing Fees
The Adopted Budget appropriated $157,500 for Planning Application & Public Hearing fee revenue. Based on elevated activity in planning submittals and public hearings, Staff is recommending an increase in this revenue category by $57,500 to a total of $215,000. • Fines and Penalties
The Adopted Budget appropriated $125,000 for California Vehicle Code (CVC) Fines revenue, $105,000 for Parking Citations, and $200,000 for Redflex Citations. Due to decreased citation activity, Staff is recommending a decrease in these revenue accounts by $155,000, bringing CVC Fines to $75,000, Parking Citations to $75,000, and Redflex Citations to $125,000.
• Community Grants
Staff is recommending an increase in this revenue category by $10,000 due to a higherthan-expected contribution from Santa Fe Christian School for the Community Grant program. The recommended increase would bring the budgeted revenue for this category to $40,000.
• General Fund Transfers-In – ARPA Funds
As part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), the City was allocated $3,180,686 in ARPA funding. These funds are being issued to local agencies in two equal tranches.
The first tranche of $1,590,343 was received and recognized in FY 22. The remaining allocation is expected to be received in the early part of FY 23. Staff is recommending adding $650,000 to the current adopted budget amount of $940,350 to account for the total remaining $1,590,350 to be received.
A summary of the recommended changes for General Fund revenues are listed in the following table:
June 22, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Update Amendments
General Fund Amendments – Expenditures
Staff has analyzed expenditure needs, trends, and contracts through May 2022 against currently adopted FY 23 budgeted expenditures. Based on this analysis, Staff is recommending increases to General Fund expenditure accounts totaling $1,882,680 as discussed below.
Professional Services
• Staff is requesting an increase of $41,250 for building services. This increase is for services provided by EsGil, whose compensation is based on building permit and plan check revenue received.
• Staff is requesting an increase of $188,750 in the Engineering & Public Works departments. This increase is for additional tree maintenance services of $18,000, $16,500 for fire suppression equipment maintenance, $30,000 for HVAC services, $34,250 for storm drain maintenance, $45,000 for on-call traffic engineering, and $45,000 for traffic signal maintenance services.
• An appropriation of $23,240 is being requested for additional travel and meeting costs, document storage costs, Laserfiche software licenses, Granicus software licenses, and agenda automation software.
Property Tax $ 215,000
Real Property Transfer Tax 115,000
Sales & Use Tax 588,400
MVLF 84,200
Short Term Vacation Rental TOT 165,000
Business Registration 100,000
Building Permits 75,000
Planning Application & Public Hearing Fees 57,500
Investment Interest 60,000
Community Grants 10,000
CVC Fines (50,000)
Parking Citations (30,000)
Redflex Citations (75,000)
Operational Revenues $ 1,315,100
General Fund Transfers-In 650,000
General Fund Transfers-In $ 650,000
Total General Fund Revenues $ 1,965,100
Proposed Revenue Budget Adjustments
General Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Additions/
Account (Deletions)
June 22, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Update Amendments
• Staff is requesting an appropriation of $15,000 in the Finance Department for property tax consultation services provided by HDL Coren & Cone. • Staff is recommending decreasing the professional services account in the Law Enforcement budget unit by $95,000. This decrease is due to the actual increase in the San Diego County Sheriffs contract being less than was projected at budget adoption.
Other Expenses
The FY 2022-23 adopted budget includes $30,000 for community grants. Including a donation from Santa Fe Christian School of $25,000, total funding available for the community grants program is $55,000. Staff is requesting to appropriate a total of $55,000, in the community grants expense accounts to match the available funding.
Salaries & Benefits
The Finance Department has analyzed projected costs associated with Salaries and Fringe Benefits in FY 2023. No additional positions are being requested at this time. The primary cause for changes in Salaries and Fringe Benefit costs are due to mid-year changes in FY 22.
The following increases to the adopted FY 2023 budget are being requested for salaries and benefit accounts:
• An increase of $169,190 in Information Technology services, to account for the mid-year addition of a Network Systems Engineer position and reclassification of the IT Director position.
• Increase of $122,315 primarily due to a mid-year addition of the Senior Human Resources Analyst position.
• Continued part-time support has been included in the City Clerks department. The department is currently progressing through a records retention and destruction project and software conversion. The fiscal impact of the additional services is $24,355 in the current fiscal year.
• Staff has included a budget increase of $20,140 in the City Manager’s department, primarily due to the mid-year salary adjustments for the Senior Management Analyst position.
• Public Safety has an overall increase included of $18,905. This increase is due to the second year of the Marine Safety MOU, and the City Council approved increases for Part-Time/Temporary/Seasonal employees.
• Included in the Community Services and Recreation departments is a total increase of $37,575 due to the mid-year reclassification of the Management Assistant from 3/4 time to full-time and the City Council approved increases for Part-Time/Temporary/Seasonal employees.
• Staff has included a budget increase of $22,085 in the Finance Department to account for the mid-year reclassification of two positions in the Finance Department and Staff is requesting the reclassification of the Senior Management Analyst position to a Risk Manager Position to allow for growth and advancement opportunities.
June 22, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Update Amendments
• A total increase of $6,870 has been included in the Community Development department due to mid-year salary increases within the department. • A net decrease has been included in the Engineering & Public Works departments due the filling of vacant positions at lower than budgeted costs.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Through the recent Community Survey conducted, residents have told us that they continue to prioritize street, pothole, and infrastructure repair. The City maintains over 46 miles of roads within Solana Beach and the City continues to strive to keep up with basic repairs and maintenance to streets as well as sidewalks, storm drains, and public facilities.
Furthermore, many of the City’s storm drain pipes were installed more than 50 years ago and are starting to fail, creating sink holes, flooding and landslides that damage streets and private properties. The City would like to prioritize fixing our storm drains to prevent future damage.
Failure to address our local road and infrastructure maintenance needs now will result in much more expensive repair costs in the future.
Based upon the FY 2023 Work Plan, the expenditure appropriations for FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program are $4,523,700 for all funds, an increase of $2,858,000 over the adopted CIP plan. The General Fund portion of the CIP plan totals $1,602,000, an increase of $1,267,000 from the adopted General Fund CIP expenditures. A summary of the full FY 2022- 23 CIP Plan can be found on Attachment 2.
Staff has also included a preliminary Five-Year CIP plan (Attachment 3). This plan shows current projected CIP expenditures each year through FY 2026-27. The current Five-Year plan shows an estimated $10,983,700 in CIP expenditures over the five-year period. This projection is subject to change based on both Council-directed priorities and funding sources available in any given year.
As of June 30, 2021, the City CIP fund had an available fund balance of $2,368,485. This fund balance is primarily made up of prior year’s General Fund surplus funds designated for future CIP projects. Since these funds originated from the General Fund, they may be used for any project. As Council considers the current CIP plan, Council has the option to allocate a portion of these funds to the CIP projects.
A summary of the recommended changes for General Fund expenditures are listed in the following table:
June 22, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Update Amendments
Other Fund Amendments
The following amendments increasing expenditures to other funds are also recommended. All wage and benefit amendments are allocations for the changes previously discussed in the General Fund Salaries and Benefits section:
Salary and Benefits
Administration $ 20,140
City Clerk Department 24,355
Community Development 6,870
Community Services 37,575
Finance 22,085
Human Resources 122,315
Information Technology 169,190
Public Safety 18,905
Engineering & Public Works (5,995)
Capital Improvement Plan - General Fund 1,267,000
Professional Services
Building Services 41,250
City Clerk Department 23,240
Engineering & Public Works 188,750
Finance 15,000
Information Technology 7,000
Law Enforcement (95,000)
Other
Community Grants 20,000
Total Operational Expenditures $ 1,882,680
Additions/
Account (Deletions)
Proposed Expenditure Budget Adjustments
General Fund
Fiscal Year 2022-23
June 22, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Update Amendments
CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:
Not a project as defined by CEQA
FISCAL IMPACT:
The adopted FY 2022-23 Budget initially projected a General Fund surplus of $798,625. Since adoption on June 23, 2021, the budget has been adjusted by various resolutions to a projected surplus of $722,055. With the FY 2022-23 Budget Update adjustments to revenues and expenditures as discussed above, the General Fund Budget would realize an increase of revenues of $1,965,100 against expenditure increases of $1,882,680, thereby increasing the projected operating surplus by $82,420 to $804,475. It is important to note that the total projected surplus of $804,475 includes one-time ARPA funds revenues of $1,590,350. These changes are shown on the following table:
Fund Name Description Amount
Revenue Adjustments
Coastal Rail Trail Benefit Fees Increase $ 2,700
Gas Tax Updated Gas Tax Estimates 14,000
SB1 - RMRA Updated RMRA Estimates 25,000
Transnet Record Transnet Loan Allocation 325,105
CIP Project Fund General Fund Transfer In 1,267,000
Total Revenue Adjustments $ 1,633,805
Expenditure Adjustments
Asset Replacement Marine Safety - MS Vehicle (Rolled from FY 22) $ 52,000 Asset Replacement Marine Safety - Personal Water Craft (Rolled from FY 22) 19,000 Asset Replacement Information Technology - Computer Replacements 32,000 Asset Replacement Information Technology - Communications/Phone Upgrades 30,000 Various Wages & Benefits 24,655
MID 9C Santa Fe Hills MID Capital Project (Rolled from FY 22) 125,000 Transnet Record Transnet Loan Debt Service 325,105
Fedral Grants ARPA Funds Adjustment-Transfer to General Fund 650,000 Coastal Rail Trail Additional Landscape Services 40,000 COPS Fund Law Enforcement Services Contract (50,000)
Various Captial Improvement Program Additions 1,591,000 Santitation Additional Sewer Maintenance 40,250
Total Expenditure Adjustments $ 2,879,010
Total Other Funds $ (1,245,205)
June 22, 2022
FY 2022-23 Budget Update Amendments
WORK PLAN:
Fiscal Sustainability
OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff Recommendation
• Deny Staff Recommendation
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution 2022-082:
1. Approving revised appropriations to the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adopted Budget.
2. Authorize the City Treasurer to amend the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget accordingly.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Department Recommendation.
_______________________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:
1. Resolution 2022-025
2. FY 2022-23 CIP Plan
3. Five-Year CIP Plan
Adopted General Fund Revenues $ 22,148,385
Budget Adjustments & Transfers -
FY 23 Budget Update Adjustments 1,965,100
Total General Fund Revenues** $ 24,113,485
Adopted General Fund Expenditures $ (21,349,760)
Budget Adjustments & Transfers (76,570)
FY 23 Budget Update Adjustments (1,882,680)
Total General Fund Expenditures $ (23,309,010)
Projected FY 2021-22 Surplus(Deficit) $ 804,475
**Note: FY 2021-22 General Fund Revenues include $1,590,350 of American Rescue Act Plan (ARPA) funds.
GENERAL FUND
Revenues
Property Tax $ 215,000
Real Property Transfer Tax 115,000
Sales & Use Tax 588,400
MVLF 84,200
Short Term Vacation Rental TOT 165,000
Business Registration 100,000
Building Permits 75,000
Planning Application & Public Hearing Fees 57,500
Investment Interest 60,000
Community Grants 10,000
CVC Fines (50,000)
Parking Citations (30,000)
Redflex Citations (75,000)
Operational Revenues $ 1,315,100
General Fund Transfers-In 650,000
General Fund Transfers-In $ 650,000
Total General Fund Revenues $ 1,965,100
Expenditures
Administration Salary and Benefits $ 20,140
City Clerk Department Salary and Benefits 24,355
Community Development Salary and Benefits 6,870
Community Services Salary and Benefits 37,575
Finance Salary and Benefits 22,085
Human Resources Salary and Benefits 122,315
Information Technology Salary and Benefits 169,190
Public Safety Salary and Benefits 18,905
Engineering & Public Works Salary and Benefits (5,995)
Building Services Professional Services 41,250
City Clerk Department Professional Services 23,240
Engineering & Public Works Professional Services 188,750 Finance Professional Services 15,000
Information Technology Professional Services 7,000
Law Enforcement Professional Services (95,000)
City Council Community Grants 20,000
Transfers-Out Capital Improvement Plan - General Fund 1,267,000 Total Operational Expenditures $ 1,882,680
OTHER FUNDS
Revenues
Coastal Rail Trail Benefit Fees Increase $ 2,700
Gas Tax Updated Gas Tax Estimates 14,000
SB1 - RMRA Updated RMRA Estimates 25,000
Transnet Record Transnet Loan Allocation 325,105
CIP Project Fund General Fund Transfer In 1,267,000
Total Revenue Adjustments $ 1,633,805
Expenditure Adjustments
Asset Replacement Marine Safety - MS Vehicle (Rolled from FY 22) $ 52,000 Asset Replacement Marine Safety - Personal Water Craft (Rolled from FY 22) 19,000 Asset Replacement Information Technology - Computer Replacements 32,000 Asset Replacement Information Technology - Communications/Phone Upgrades 30,000 Various Wages & Benefits 24,655
MID 9C Santa Fe Hills MID Capital Project (Rolled from FY 22) 125,000 Transnet Record Transnet Loan Debt Service 325,105
Fedral Grants ARPA Funds Adjustment-Transfer to General Fund 650,000 Coastal Rail Trail Additional Landscape Services 40,000 COPS Fund Law Enforcement Services Contract (50,000)
Various Captial Improvement Program Additions 1,591,000 Santitation Additional Sewer Maintenance 40,250
Total Expenditure Adjustments $ 2,879,010
Total Other Funds $ (1,245,205)
Account Additions/ (Deletions)
Exhibit A
Resolution 2022-082
Project Description
Street, Traffic, & Storm Drain Projects
ADA Pedestrian Ramps 45,700 45,700
Annual Pavement Management Program 694,000 154,000 250,000 290,000 Glencrest Sidewalk Installation 75,000 75,000
Lomas Santa Fe @ NTCD Bridge-Repairs 120,000 120,000
Miscellaneous Traffic Calming Projects 30,000 30,000
Pedestrian Crossing at North End Hwy 101 25,000 25,000
Santa Helena Roadside Park 50,000 50,000
Storm Drain Improvements - Major 300,000 300,000
South Acacia Avenue Reconstruction Design 90,000 90,000 Traffic Signal Upgrades Phase 1 81,000 81,000
Traffic Signal Upgrades Phase 2 -
Total $ 1,510,700 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 410,000 $ 465,000 $ - $ - $ 45,700 $ 290,000 $ - $ - City Facilities Projects
City Hall Deferred Maint (space planning) 25,000 25,000 City Hall Elevator 75,000 75,000
City Hall Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade 100,000 100,000 Fire Station Deferred Maint (floor/cabinets) 90,000 90,000 Fire Station Generator 70,000 70,000
Fletcher Cove Playground Design/Construction 375,000 375,000 Fletcher Cove Access Ramp 250,000 250,000
Fletcher Cove Concrete Repairs 90,000 90,000
Fletcher Cove Dissipator 40,000 40,000
FCCC Deferred Maint (roof/floor replace) 230,000 230,000 Glenmont Pocket Park Design 50,000 50,000
LCCC/Museum 10,000 10,000
La Colonia Master Plan Update 52,000 52,000
LC Park Playground Project Design/Construction 436,000 150,000 186,000 100,000 Marine Safety Building 450,000 450,000
Marine Safety Center Deferred Maint (roof) 50,000 50,000 Total $ 2,393,000 $ 1,182,000 $ 70,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 186,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 830,000 $ - 20,000 20,000
Other Projects
City-Wide Tree planting project
Climate Action Plan 100,000 100,000
Total $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sanitation Projects
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Rehabilitation 500,000 500,000
Total $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 GRAND TOTAL $ 4,523,700 $ 1,602,000 $ 70,000 $ 25,000 $ 410,000 $ 465,000 $ 186,000 $ 100,000 $ 45,700 $ 290,000 $ 830,000 $ 500,000 Unfunded Projects
Lomas Santa Fe Drive Corridor 15,000,000
Marine Safety Building Construction 10,000,000
Santa Helena Neighborhood Trail Design/Const 2,500,000
Traffic Signal Updates Phase 3 1,300,000
Total 28,800,000
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FY 2022-23
Equipment
Replacement
Facilities
Replacement State Grants
TOT Sand
Replenishment Sanitation
County
Total Budget General Fund Gas Tax Transnet Grants SB1
Federal
Grants
Funding Source
Street, Traffic, & Storm Drain Projects
ADA Pedestrian Ramps 45,700 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 225,700 Annual Pavement Management Program 694,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 3,534,000 Glencrest Sidewalk Installation 75,000 - - - - 75,000
Lomas Santa Fe @ NTCD Bridge-Repairs 120,000 - - - - 120,000 Miscellaneous Traffic Calming Projects 30,000 - - - - 30,000 Pedestrian Crossing at North End Hwy 101 25,000 - - - - 25,000 Santa Helena Roadside Park 50,000 - - - - 50,000
Storm Drain Improvements - Major 300,000 - - - - 300,000 South Acacia Avenue Reconstruction Design 90,000 - - - - 90,000 Traffic Signal Upgrades Phase 1 81,000 - - - - 81,000
Traffic Signal Upgrades Phase 2 - 230,000 230,000 230,000 230,000 920,000 Total 1,510,700 985,000 985,000 985,000 985,000 5,450,700 City Facilities Projects
City Hall Deferred Maint (space planning) 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 City Hall Elevator 75,000 - - - - 75,000
City Hall Council Chambers Audio/Visual Upgrade 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Fire Station Deferred Maint (floor/cabinets) 90,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 130,000 Fire Station Generator 70,000 - - - - 70,000
Fletcher Cove Playground Design/Construction 375,000 - - - - 375,000 Fletcher Cove Access Ramp 250,000 - - - - 250,000
Fletcher Cove Concrete Repairs 90,000 - - - - 90,000
Fletcher Cove Dissipator 40,000 - - - - 40,000
FCCC Deferred Maint (roof/floor replace) 230,000 - - - - 230,000 Glenmont Pocket Park Design 50,000 300,000 - - - 350,000 LCCC/Museum 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000
La Colonia Master Plan Update 52,000 - - - - 52,000
LC Park Playground Project Design/Construction 436,000 - - - - 436,000 Marine Safety Building 450,000 - - - - 450,000
Marine Safety Center Deferred Maint (roof) 50,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 70,000 Total 2,393,000 345,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 2,873,000
20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000
Other Projects
City-Wide Tree planting project
Climate Action Plan 100,000 - - - - 100,000
Total 120,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 160,000
Sanitation Projects
Sanitary Sewer Pipeline Rehabilitation 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 Total 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000 GRAND TOTAL 4,523,700 1,840,000 1,540,000 1,540,000 1,540,000 10,983,700 TOTAL
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FORECAST
FY 2022-23 - FY 2026-27
2022-23
Proposed
2023-24
Forecast
2024-25
Forecast
2025-26
Forecast
2026-27
Forecast
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.4.
STAFF REPORT
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Gregory Wade, City Manager
MEETING DATE: June 22, 2022
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Clerk’s Office / City Elections Official SUBJECT: Calling the General Municipal Election for November 8, 2022 for District 2 Councilmember and District 4 Councilmember BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to the California Elections Code (EC) Section 1301 and Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC) Section 2.24.010, the City of Solana Beach conducts its General Municipal Election on the same day as the Statewide General Election. The purpose of the City’s General Election is to vote on elected positions of the legislative body and any ballot measures qualified for the ballot. The next General Election will be held November 8, 2022.
District Elections of the Legislative Body
On July 10, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance 488 establishing a By-District Election Process in Four Council Districts and an Elective Office of Mayor. The four districts were determined from public meeting input as well as the guidance of a demographer to ensure the required district election criteria was met, after which the Council adopted the final district map.
Every 10 years, following the nation's updated U.S. Census, districts must be re-assessed and adjusted to meet the required criteria. Following four public hearings, on March 23, 2022, Council adopted District Map 202, which adjusted the boundaries of Districts 1 and 2 (Attachment 1). Pursuant to California Elections Code section 10010 and California Government Code sections 34871(C) & 34886, the adopted map and sequence of elections were incorporated. The November 8, 2022 General Election will complete the transition to district elections.
This agenda item is before Council to officially call the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election by adoption of resolutions to this effect and other related election matters. The local ballot would contain the following items:
o Elected Councilmember for District 2 for a 4-year term o Elected Councilmember for District 4 for a 4-year term DISCUSSION:
Each General Municipal Election requires the passing of Resolutions in order to:
• Call and Give Notice of the Election listing the elected seats and Determine Tie Vote Provisions (Attachment 2)
June 22, 2022
General Municipal Election – November 8, 2022
• Define the regulations for Candidate Statements (Attachment 4) • Consolidate the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election, whenever possible, and utilize the professional services of the County Registrar of Voters for a number of election duties and tasks, by submitting a formal request to the San Diego County Board of Supervisors (Attachment 3)
Consolidation with Statewide Election and San Diego County Registrar of Voters Pursuant to California Elections Code 10403, the City must submit a formal request to the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, via resolution, to consolidate the City’s election with the statewide election. Consolidation provides the most cost effective and accurate method of election processes to utilize the proficiency of the San Diego County Registrar of Voters (ROV).
When consolidated, the City contracts the services of the ROV to handle multiple requirements for procuring voting centers, precinct workers, required postings, printing and mailing of the sample ballot and mail ballots, and canvassing the returns of the election. All other preliminary functions of the election are conducted by the City Clerk, as the local Elections Official.
California Voter’s Choice Act (VCA)
The California Voter’s Choice Act (VCA) modernized elections in California by allowing counties to conduct elections under a model which provides greater flexibility and convenience for voters. This election model allows voters to choose how, when, and where to cast their ballot. In California, every registered voter will automictically receive a ballot in the mail before the election. The VCA also expanded in-person early voting, allows voters to cast a ballot at any vote center within their county, and provides secure ballot drop off locations throughout the county.
District Elections of the Legislative Body
The four-year terms of Councilmembers Kelly Harless and Kristi Becker expire December 2022, at the Council meeting that will certify the November 2022 election. This election continues the transition to district-based City Council elections with the election of Councilmembers for the remaining Districts, 2 and 4. The transition to district-based City Council elections will be completed with the election of Councilmembers to these two districts.
Candidates for District 2 and 4 and relative voters can verify their District by checking their voter registration on the San Diego Registrar of Voters website www.sdvote.com. Voters living in Districts 2 and 4 will receive a ballot to vote for Council for their designated District.
Candidate Nomination Period and Deadline
Being sensitive to COVID-19 and particular individuals’ comfort level, some alternative procedures will be offered for the candidate filing process. Therefore, some alternative options to meet via an online meeting, instead of in-person, to receive candidate information and documents via mail or email will be outlined on the City’s website and by the City Clerk/Elections Official. All original signature documents will still be required to be issued and received in original hard copy by the deadline. These details will be provided on the City’s website and by the City Clerk to each candidate.
Filers are asked to reserve appointments with the City Clerk at the beginning of the candidate filing period, beginning Monday, July 18, 2022. At the appointment, the candidate will pull the June 22, 2022
General Municipal Election – November 8, 2022
required nomination document and other required paperwork and be briefed on various additional requirements to qualify as a candidate for the ballot, including local campaign regulations, etc. Once candidates complete the necessary paperwork, they are asked to make appointments to officially file all required paperwork before the deadline. If certain paperwork is not complete or filed, the candidate may be deemed insufficient. Therefore, filing early may allow time for the required signatures on the nomination paper to be verified and, if needed, a Supplemental Nomination Paper issued, which all must be filed by the deadline of August 12, 2022. The City of Solana Beach has a $25.00 candidate filing fee due at the time of filing.
Candidate Statements
As specified in EC 13307, Candidate Statements, which are optional for each candidate, are a brief description of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate.
Candidate Statements are prepared on a specified form issued by the Elections Official, printed in the Sample Ballot, and mailed to all registered voters. These optional statements are paid for by the candidate. The estimated charge for the Candidate Statement covers the cost of printing, handling, translating, and inclusion in the Sample Ballot. The estimates are based on varying factors including the number of candidates running, how many other elections take place within the consolidated election, and the number of words allowed in the Candidate Statement, 200 or 400 words.
The City Council chose a 400-word count for the Candidate Statement for the November 2020 Election and all prior elections used a 200-word count. It is up to the City Council to determine the word count for the candidate statement for this election. Whichever word count is authorized by Council will be the required word count for all Candidate Statements. Candidates are required to prepay the established estimated cost when they file the Candidate Statement with all official election papers for candidate qualification and sign an understanding that the charge is an estimate and not the final cost.
This estimate is provided by the San Diego County Registrar of Voters, with whom the City contracts to provide certain election services. Candidates will be responsible for any additional cost or will receive a refund, whichever applies after the accounting of the election is finalized.
Resolution 2022-078, as drafted, contemplates a 200-word limit. Should the Council decide to increase the Candidate Statement to 400 words, the resolution will be revised accordingly.
Resolving a Tie Vote
If the election results in a tie vote, there are two options for reconciling the tie. A tie vote may be decided by lot (e.g., tossing a coin, etc.) or by conducting a special runoff election involving those candidates who receive an equal number of votes. The City Council must decide, prior to the election, how to determine the tie vote. Determining the winner of a tie vote using the “by lot” method results in minimal cost to the City.
If the election results in a tie vote and Council elects to opt for a runoff, then an appropriate resolution would be brought back at a later date to call a Special Runoff Election. A Special Runoff Election, held by itself (without consolidation with another statewide election), and contracting these services from the San Diego County Registrar of Voters could cost in excess of $200,000, based on the last estimate provided to the City for a Special Election.
June 22, 2022
General Municipal Election – November 8, 2022
Staff recommends Council determine the resolution of a tie vote using the “by lot” method.
However, if Council determines a Special Runoff Election is the appropriate method, then a resolution would need to be brought back, prior to the election, for adoption.
Cancellation of Candidate Election
In the event that an equal number of qualified candidates do not exceed the number of Council positions to be filled for each District, Elections Code Section 10229 allows Council to make a determination of whether to appoint the candidates in lieu of holding the scheduled election.
Following the nomination period, if the City Clerk discovers that the above circumstance applies, a certificate of facts would be presented to Council at a Council meeting for the determination on whether to appoint the candidates in lieu of placing them on the ballot.
CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:
Not a project as defined by CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Biennial general municipal election costs are determined by the number of registered voters, the Registrar of Voter’s costs for services, and the City’s costs for its required publication notices, translations, etc. The San Diego County Registrar of Voters provided preliminary estimates for the election based on two candidates running for each of the two offices totaling approximately $50,000.
Currently, the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget allocates $65,000 towards the General Election.
WORK PLAN: This it would complete Work Plan Priority Item - Fiscal Sustainability – Transition from At-Large to District-Based Council Member Elections.
OPTIONS:
• Approve Staff recommendation to call the General Election, consolidate with the County, choose a 200-word or 400-word candidate statement, and opt for a tie vote decided by lot. • Do not approve the calling of the General Election and return to call a Special Election to comply with the Solana Beach Municipal Code and State of California Codes.
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution 2022-076 Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the Election of Certain Officers as required by the Provision of the Laws of the State of California Relating to General Law Cities and determining tie vote provisions.
2. Adopt Resolution 2022-077 requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego to Consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, with the Statewide General Election to be held on that date.
3. Adopt Resolution 2022-078 adopting regulations for Candidates for Elective Office June 22, 2022
General Municipal Election – November 8, 2022
pertaining to Candidate’s Statements.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________
Gregory Wade, City Manager
Attachments:
1. Adopted District Map for District Elections Boundaries
2. Resolution 2022-076 – Call Election, Reconcile Tie Vote
3. Resolution 2020-077 – Election Consolidation Request
4. Resolution 2020-078 – Candidate Statements
3 2
1 4
5 5
Pacific Ocean
Seabright Ln
Santa Helena Park Ct
Ida Ave
Hwy 101
S Rios Ave
Santa Estella
S
anta
Rosita
Santa Dominga
N Cedros Ave
Stevens Ave
Santa Cecelia
W Solana Cir
Via
Mil Cu
m
bres
Highland Dr
Holmwood
Ln
Santa Bartola
Lomas Santa Fe Dr S Cedros Ave
Santa
Luisa
Dr
Avocado Pl
Marsolan Ave
Santa Queta
Via La Senda
Santa Helena
S Sierra Ave
N Rios Ave
Powerline
S Nardo Ave
San
Rodolfo
Dr
Marine View Ave
Dell St
Barbara Ave
Solana Hills Dr
San Patricio Dr
Santa Alicia
E So al na Cir
S Granados Ave
Acacia Ave
Via De La Valle
N Sierra Ave
San
Lucas Dr
Academy Dr
Highland Dr
Vista
De
La
Tierra
San Andres Dr
Glenmont Dr
N Granados Ave
Santa Florencia
Santa Olivia
Via De Vista
Pacific Ave
Ford Ave
San Julio Rd
America
Way
Glencrest Dr
Santa Victoria
Cerro Verde Dr
Hwy 101
Sun Valley
Rd
Marview Dr
Tercer Verde
Lomas Santa Fe Dr
Genevieve St
Canyon Dr
W Cir Dr
Castro
St
San Igna
c
io
E Cir Dr
Del Mar Downs Rd
High al nd Ct
Loma Corta Dr
Steve
ns
Ave
W
Solana Dr
Marvista Dr
Ramona Pl
Santa Camelia Dr
Longden Ln
Rosa St
San Mario Dr
E Cliff St
Fresca St
Solana Hills Ct
Juanita St
Punta Baja Dr
C
a
m Teresa
Vera St
Nardito Ln
L
a So
brina
Ct
Bay Meadow Way
Sea Cliff Ln
Cam De Clara
Patty Hill
Dr
Avocado Ct
El Viento St
Canyon Pl
Cam Ynez
Gibson Pt
Spindrift Dr
Brookdale Pl
Santa Inez
Dell Ct
Cmt Ladera
Cll Santa
Fe
Ladera Linda
Lugano
Ln
S Helix Ave
Hilmen
Pl
Solana
Point Cir
Oranado Ln
Midori Ln
B
order Ave
Woodside
Way
San Leon Ct
Santa
Rufin
a
Ct
Solana
Vista
Dr
Santa Theresa
W Cliff St
Tierra Alta
Estrella St
Hialeah Cir
Chapala
Way
Rios
Ct
San Benito
Ct
Ta
m
p
ico
Wa
y
N Shore Dr
Nava Way
North Ln
�2021 CALIPER
Resolution 2022-028 Solana Beach 2021 Redistricting
Public 202
r
I
I
\
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I' , I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
II
I
I
\
\
1 T
I
I
EXHIBIT A
\
\
\
\
L~
1\
1\
I
l l
,-
1·
l I
) I
/
Map layers
Public 202
- Pipeline Powerline - Railroad
Streets
Water Area
LJ Currents
Public 202
District 1
Total Pop 3,276
Deviation from ideal 38
% Deviation 1.17%
% Hisp 6.5%
% NH White 82%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 7%
Total 2,351
% Hisp 8%
% NH White 83%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 7%
Total 2,603
% Latino est. 3%
% Spanish-Surnamed 3%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 90%
% NH Black 2%
Total 2,396
% Latino est. 3%
% Spanish-Surnamed 3%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 90%
% NH Black 2%
Total 1,921
% Latino est. 3%
% Spanish-Surnamed 3%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 0%
% NH White est. 91%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 3,177
age0-19 22%
age20-60 47%
age60plus 31%
immigrants 13%
naturalized 60%
english 85%
spanish 6%
asian-lang 4%
other lang 5%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 5%
hs-grad 19%
bachelor 37%
graduatedegree 38%
Child in Household child-under18 30%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 58%
income 0-25k 7%
income 25-50k 8%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 30%
income 200k-plus 44%
single family 86%
multi-family 14%
rented 23%
owned 77%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 3,165
-73
-2.25%
26%
68%
1%
6%
2,740
22%
69%
1%
7%
2,341
11%
10%
2%
1%
86%
1%
2,103
11%
10%
2%
1%
87%
1%
1,641
10%
9%
2%
0%
87%
1%
3,973
21%
58%
22%
13%
49%
72%
21%
3%
5%
10%
30%
31%
23%
31%
71%
7%
13%
14%
43%
22%
64%
36%
44%
56%
3 3,334
96 2.96%
19%
75%
1%
7%
2,708
6%
89%
0%
4%
2,394
6%
6%
3%
0%
90%
0%
2,177
6%
6%
3%
0%
90%
0%
1,705
5%
5%
3%
0%
91%
0%
3,235
14%
54%
31%
17%
50%
90%
4%
2%
3%
3%
24%
38%
29%
18%
67%
11%
19%
14%
38%
18%
34%
66%
55%
45%
4 3,178
-60
-1.85%
7%
83%
1%
7%
2,608
4%
89%
0%
6%
2,597
4%
4%
3%
1%
92%
0%
2,397
4%
4%
3%
1%
92%
0%
2,025
4%
3%
3%
0%
92%
0%
3,247
21%
44%
35%
12%
76%
89%
4%
2%
5%
1%
15%
46%
35%
21%
57%
7%
11%
11%
44%
26%
77%
23%
23%
77%
Total
12,953
169
5.22%
14%
77%
1%
6%
10,407
10%
82%
1%
6%
9,935
6%
6%
3%
1%
89%
1%
9,073
6%
5%
3%
1%
90%
1%
7,292
5%
5%
3%
0%
91%
1%
13,631
19%
51%
29%
14%
57%
83%
9%
3%
5%
5%
23%
38%
31%
25%
64%
8%
13%
13%
39%
27%
62%
38%
38%
62%
03/09/2022 14:01 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
I
I
I
I
I
Mamitude For Redistricting
RESOLUTION 2022-076
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR THE
HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS
OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING
TO GENERAL LAW CITIES.
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to General Law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 8, 2022, for the election of municipal officers; and
WHEREAS, it is most beneficial to contract the services of the County of San Diego Registrar of Voters to conduct certain election operations and canvass the returns of said General Municipal Election, and that the City Clerk carry out all other necessary procedures for such election.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1. All of the foregoing recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirement of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Solana Beach, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, a General Municipal Election for the following purposes:
• Electing a Councilmember from District 2 for a full term of four years; and • Electing a Councilmember from District 4 for a full term of four years.
SECTION 3. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law.
SECTION 4. That pursuant to Resolution 2022-077, the election department of the County of San Diego is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printer matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
SECTION 5. That the City Council authorizes the City Clerk to administer said election and all reasonable and actual election expenses shall be paid by the City upon presentation of a properly submitted bill.
ATTACHMENT 2
Resolution 2022-076
Calling November Election
SECTION 6. That the polls for the election shall be open at 7:00 a.m. on the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until 8:00 p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California.
SECTION 7. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.
SECTION 8. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.
SECTION 9. That in the event of a tie vote (if any two or more persons receive an equal and the highest number of votes for an office) as certified by the San Diego County Registrar of Voters (ROV), the City Council, in accordance with Election Code Section 15651(b), shall set a date, time, and place and summon the candidates who have received the tie votes to appear and will determine the tie by lot.
SECTION 10. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the Solana Beach City Council held on the 22nd day of June, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
____________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ____________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2022-077
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO
CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022, WITH THE STATEWIDE
GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022, for election of municipal officers, Councilmembers Districts 2 and 4; and
WHEREAS, in the course of conduct of the election it is necessary for the City to request services of the County; and
WHEREAS, all necessary expenses in performing these services shall be paid by the City of Solana Beach; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the City the precincts, voting centers, and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the county election department of the County of San Diego canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election held Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the purpose of electing municipal officers, Councilmembers Districts 2 and 4; and
SECTION 2. That the County of San Diego San Diego County Registrar of Voters be authorized to render election services and proceedings including procuring and furnishing any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies and equipment and paraphernalia incidental to and connected with the conduct of the subject election as well as canvassing the returns of the General Municipal Election in order to properly and lawfully conduct such election. The election will be held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election.
SECTION 3. That the Board of Supervisors is
requested to issue instructions to the county election ATTACHMENT 3 Resolution 2022-077
Consolidation of Election
department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.
SECTION 4. That the County of San Diego shall be reimbursed in full for the services performed by the San Diego County Registrar of Voters for the City of Solana Beach upon presentation of a proper invoice, and the City agrees to indemnify and save free and harmless the County, its officers, agents and employees from expense or liability, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, as a result of any election contest arising after conduct of this election, so long as the basis for any such claim arises from the conduct of the City or as a result of the reasonable reliance by County upon information provided by City.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the county election department of the County of San Diego.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 22nd day of June, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
____________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ ________________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2022-078
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES
FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE’S
STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022.
WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidates statement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of Solana Beach on November 8, 2022 may prepare a candidate’s statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself/herself. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations.
The statement is to be filed (in typewritten form) in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate’s nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period.
SECTION 2. FOREIGN LANGUAGE POLICY
A. Pursuant to the Federal Voting Rights Act, the candidate’s statements are required to be translated in all languages as required. The County is required to translate candidate’s statements into the following languages: Spanish, Tagalog/Filipino, Vietnamese, and Chinese.
B. The County will mail sample ballots and candidates statements in Spanish, Tagalog/Filipino, Vietnamese, and Chinese to only those voters who are on the county voter file as having requested a sample ballot in a particular language. The County will make the sample ballots and candidates statements in the required languages available at all voting centers, on the County’s website, and in the Election Official’s office.
ATTACHMENT 4
Resolution 2022-078
Candidate’s Statements
SECTION 3. PAYMENT
A. Translations:
1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate’s statement into any required foreign language as specified in (A) pursuant to the Federal and/or State law.
B. Printing
1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in English in the voter’s pamphlet.
2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in a foreign language in the voter’s pamphlet.
The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating and mailing the candidate’s statements filed pursuant to this section, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the City of Solana Beach his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter’s pamphlet. The estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the City Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost.
In the event of underpayment, the City Clerk shall require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the City Clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election or as soon as the final amount is known from the Registrar of Voters.
SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS
A) All translations shall be provided by professionally certified translators.
B) The City Clerk shall comply with all recommendations and standards set forth by the California Secretary of State, the San Diego County Registrar Voters, and local municipal codes and regulations, in other matters relating to elections.
SECTION 5. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued.
SECTION 7. That all previous resolutions establishing council policy on payment for candidate’s statements are repealed.
SECTION 8. That this resolution shall apply at the next ensuing municipal election, November 8, 2022, and at each municipal election after that time.
Resolution 2022-078
Candidate’s Statements
SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 22nd day of June, 2022, by the following vote.
AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
____________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ____________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk