Solana Beach City Council
May 22, 2024

Landscaping:

Once the eroded gullies have been repaired on the slope, temporary irrigation will be installed, and the upper bluff will be revegetated with container plants and hydroseed. All plant materials will be native, drought tolerant, salt tolerant, and noninvasive plant species. The proposed landscape plans were reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect and are anticipated to provide ninety percent coverage within five years, or that percentage of ground cover demonstrated locally appropriate for a healthy stand of the particular native vegetation type chosen for the restoration.

Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking, and Storage Areas:

No new roads, pedestrian walkways, parking, or storage areas are proposed with this DRP modification.

Grading:

There is no proposed change in topography with the proposed DRP modification.

Backfilling of soil is proposed to fill eroded gullies within the existing geogrid reinforced slope.

Lighting:

No new lighting is proposed with this DRP modification.

Usable Open Space:

No additional open space is proposed with the DRP modification.

DRP Finding #3
No additional discretionary permits are required by the City for the proposed maintenance and repairs.

DRP Finding #4
If the City Council is able to make the required findings to approve the DRP modification, the Applicants will be required to obtain approval of a Coastal Development Permit from the CCC prior to issuance of a grading permit from the City.

Staff has prepared draft findings for approval of the project in the attached Resolution 2024-061 for Council’s consideration based upon the information in this report. Additional project conditions from the Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments have been incorporated. In conclusion, the proposed project, as conditioned, could be found to be consistent with the Zoning regulations and the General Plan.

The Council may direct Staff to modify the Resolution to reflect the findings and conditions it deems appropriate as a result of the Public Hearing process. If the Council determines May 22, 2024
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

the project is to be denied, Staff will prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at a subsequent Council meeting.

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:

Notice of the City Council Public Hearing was published in the San Diego Union Tribune more than 10 days prior to the public hearing. The same public notice was mailed to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project site, more than 10 days prior to the planned Public Hearing date of May 22, 2024. Staff has not received any emails, letters or calls in support or opposition of the proposed modification as of the date this report was written.

CEQA COMPLIANCE:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of the Sate CEQA Guidelines. Class 1 exemptions consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The proposed project would repair the existing upper bluff geogrid slope and re-vegetate the upper bluff after the original vegetation failed. There will be no expansion from the original approval.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
• Approve the proposed modification by adopting Resolution 2024-061; • Approve modification by adopting Resolution 2024-061 with changes as deemed appropriate by City Council; or,
• Deny the request to amend the project and direct Staff to bring back a Resolution of denial to a later City Council meeting date.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

The proposed project meets the minimum objective requirements under the SBMC, is consistent with the General Plan and may be found, as conditioned, to meet the discretionary findings to approve a modification to the approved CUP. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the Public Hearing, Report Council disclosures, Receive public testimony, Close the Public Hearing.

2. Find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.

3. If the City Council makes the requisite findings and approves the project, adopt Resolution 2024-061 conditionally approving a modification to the CUP for the May 22, 2024
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

backfilling of existing eroded gullies within the existing geogrid reinforced slope, installation of secondary geogrid in the backfill of the gully repair, installation of temporary irrigation, and revegetation of the upper bluff with native container plants and hydroseeding on the coastal bluff below 255, 261, and 265 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation
_________________________
Alyssa Muto, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2024-061

2. Resolution 1998-101

3. Resolution 2014-111

4. Monitoring Report

5. Proposed Project Plans

6. Geotechnical Review
RESOLUTION 2024-061

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT (DRP)

MODIFICATION FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS TO THE

EXISTING GEOGRID REINFORCED UPPER BLUFF
RESTORATION ON THE COASTAL BLUFF BELOW 255, 261,
AND 265 PACIFIC AVENUE, SOLANA BEACH.

APPLICANTS: Antonio and Maria Alamo Family Trust,
Sivage Family Revocable Trust, and
Bradley and Susan Stone
CASE NO.: MOD24-002
WHEREAS, , Antonio and Maria Alamo Family Trust, Sivage Family Revocable Trust, and Bradley and Susan Stone (hereinafter referred to as “Applicants”), have submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) Modification pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing on May 22, 2024, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the Public Hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the Hearing, and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

I. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

II. That the request for a DRP Modification for maintenance and repairs to the existing geogrid reinforced upper bluff restoration on the coastal bluff below 255, 261, and 265 Pacific Avenue including backfilling existing eroded gullies within the existing geogrid reinforced slope, installation of secondary geogrid in the backfill of the gully repair, installation of temporary irrigation on the upper bluff, and revegetation of the upper bluff with native container plants and hydroseeding is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

III. FINDINGS
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

General Plan Consistency
The General Plan designates the property as Medium Density Residential and is intended for multi-family residential development at a maximum density of 5-7 dwelling units per acre. Development in the immediate neighborhood consists of single-family residential development. The proposed development could also be found to be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods.

Local Coastal Plan/Land Use Plan Consistency
The City Council adopted an LCP/LUP on February 27, 2013 (amended and certified on June 11, 2014). Although the LUP has been certified by the California Coastal Commission, the Local Implementation Plan (LIP) portion of the LCP has not yet been certified; as such, the provisions of the LUP are considered to be advisory rather than mandatory at this time.

The proposed project is subject to the following LUP policies:

Policy 4.27: Require all bluff property landscaping for new development to consist of native, non-invasive, drought-tolerant, fire-resistant, and salt-tolerant species.

Policy 4.54: Any bluff retention device shall be reasonably maintained and repaired by the bluff property owner on an “as needed” basis, at the bluff property owner’s expense, in accordance with the implementing ordinances and any permit issued by the City. Any authorized assessing entity in which the project lies shall ensure such payments are reimbursed to the City if the bluff property owner fails to perform such work and the City elects to do so, subject to mandatory reimbursement.

However, in all cases, after inspection, it is apparent that repair and maintenance is necessary, including maintenance of the color of the structures to ensure a continued match with the surrounding native Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

bluffs, the bluff property owner or assessing entity shall contact the City or CCC office to determine whether permits are necessary, and, if necessary, shall subsequently apply for a coastal development permit for the required maintenance.

Policy 4.55: To achieve a well maintained, aesthetically pleasing, and safer shoreline, coordination among property owners regarding maintenance and repair of all bluff retention devices is strongly encouraged. This may also result in cost savings through the realization of economies of scale to achieve these goals by coordination through an assessing entity. All bluff retention devices existing as of the date of certification of the LCP, to the extent they do not conform to the requirements of the LCP, shall be deemed non-conforming. A bluff property owner may elect to conform his/her/its bluff property or bluff retention device to the LCP at any time if the City finds that an existing bluff retention device that is required to protect existing principal structures in danger from erosion is structurally unsound, is unsafe, or is materially jeopardizing contiguous private or public principal structures for which there is no other adequate and feasible solution, then the City may require reconstruction of the bluff retention device.

The City’s third-party geotechnical engineer Universal Engineering Sciences (UES) reviewed the proposed modification plans and application information and determined that the proposed modification “is in substantial conformance with LCP policy 4.54, which states that “Any bluff retention devise shall be reasonably maintained and repaired by the bluff property owner on an as-needed basis…” Their approval letter has been provided in attachment 5.

Specific Plans and Special Overlays
The entire City of Solana Beach is located within the Coastal Zone. As a condition of project approval, the Applicants are required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit prior to the issuance of grading permits.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency:

SBMC Section 17.20.010(C) specifies that the MR Zone is intended to provide for residential development in areas characterized primarily by detached single-family dwellings on older subdivided lots and two-family and multiple-family dwellings within newer, large lot, planned developments.

Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

17.68.040.F:
a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses: The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and complementary to existing development in the immediate vicinity of the project site and the surrounding neighborhood. The development as
proposed shall also be compatible in scale, apparent bulk, and massing with such existing development in the surrounding neighborhood. Site planning on or near the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects.

Properties on the west side of Pacific Avenue are subject to specific development regulations due to their location along the coastal bluff. Many are protected by existing Bluff Retention Devices (BRD) that were constructed prior to the adoption of the City’s Local Coastal Plan and Land Use Plan.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed to minimize adverse impacts on the surrounding properties and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhance their intended use and complement existing site topography. Multi-family residential buildings shall be sited to avoid crowding and to allow for a functional use of the space between buildings.

No new buildings are proposed with the DRP modification. c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area. To the maximum extent practicable, landscaping and plantings shall be used to screen parking areas, storage areas, access roads, and other service uses of the site. Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

Drought tolerant plant materials and water conserving irrigation systems shall be incorporated into all landscaping plans.

Once the eroded gullies have been repaired on the slope, temporary irrigation will be installed, and the upper bluff will be revegetated with container plants and hydroseed. All plant materials will be native, drought tolerant, salt tolerant, and noninvasive plant species. The proposed landscape plans were reviewed by the City’s third-party landscape architect and are anticipated to provide ninety percent coverage within five years, Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

or that percentage of ground cover demonstrated locally appropriate for a healthy stand of the particular native vegetation type chosen for the restoration.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways. Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view, to the extent feasible, by existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.

No new roads, pedestrian walkways, parking, or storage areas are proposed with this DRP modification.
e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

There is no proposed change in topography with the proposed DRP modification. Backfilling of soil is proposed to fill eroded gullies within the existing geogrid reinforced slope.
f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding areas per SBMC 17.60.060 (Exterior Lighting Regulations).

No new lighting is proposed with this DRP modification. g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.

No additional open space is proposed with the DRP modification.

III. All required permits and approvals including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit.

No additional discretionary permits are required by the City for the proposed maintenance and repairs.

IV. If the development project also requires a permit or approval to be issued by a state or federal agency, the city council may conditionally approve the development review permit upon the Applicants obtaining the required permit or approval from the other agency.

The Applicants are required to obtain approval of a Coastal Development Permit from the CCC prior to issuance of a grading permit from the City.

V. CONDITIONS:

Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. Grading Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City Council on May 22, 2024, and located in the project file with a submittal date of March 26, 2024.

II. The Applicants shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.

III. The Applicants shall provide a full Landscape Documentation Package in compliance with SBMC Chapter 17.56 and in substantial conformance with the approved landscape plan included in the project plans presented to the City Council on May 22, 2024, prior to Grading Permit issuance and consistent with the building construction plan.

The landscape plan and installation will be reviewed and inspected by the City’s third-party landscape professional. Prior to final inspection of the building permit (and occupancy), the landscape installation shall pass inspection by the City’s third-party landscape professional.

IV. The Applicants shall submit landscape security in a form prescribed by the City Engineer in addition to the grading security. The landscape security deposit shall be released after the landscape has been established and the temporary irrigation has been removed a maximum of 24-months from installation.

V. All plant material shall be native, non-invasive, drought-tolerant, fire- Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

resistant, and salt-tolerant species.

VI. The temporary irrigation system shall include a redundant valve control/shut off valves to prevent any irrigation system leaks or failures.

VII. All landscape plantings shall be in a good growing condition throughout the life of the project and whenever necessary, shall be replaced with new plant materials to ensure compliance with the landscape plan.

VIII. The temporary irrigation shall be inspected after 12 months following the planting to ensure planting success and to verify that irrigation is still required. A report prepared by the licensed landscape architect of record detailing the status of the vegetation, an assessment of the condition of the temporary irrigation system and a recommendation on whether the temporary irrigation is still necessary shall be provided to the City.

IX. The temporary irrigation system my remain active and in place up to a maximum of 24 months at the approval of the City and shall be removed once plants have become established.

X. Construction vehicles shall be parked on the subject property at all times when feasible. If construction activity prohibits parking on the subject property, the Applicants shall ensure construction vehicles are parked in such a way to allow sufficient vehicular access on Pacific Avenue and minimize impact to the surrounding neighbors.

B. Fire Department Conditions:

I. N/A
C. Engineering Department Conditions:

I. Obtain required California Coastal Commission Permits prior to the issuance of any structure and grading permits or present evidence that an emergency waiver has been granted.

II. The project shall be designed and shall provide appropriate data to confirm the submitted design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

This shall include, but is not limited to, a geotechnical report.

III. If access from the beach is required, the property owners shall post securities to guarantee proper care and use of the Fletcher Cove Beach Access Ramp. No construction materials to be off-loaded on the ramp, at the end of the ramp or any public property including streets and Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

Fletcher Cove Park. No washing of equipment shall occur unless a containment system is properly utilized.

IV. For all projects on which equipment is driven on the Fletcher Cove Beach Access Ramp, the ramp and adjacent parking lot must be swept daily to remove sand that has been tracked onto the ramp and parking lot. At least once a week, the access ramp and parking lot must be swept with a street sweeper that is capable of cleaning the streets and parking lots of paper, glass, dirt, silt, sand, rocks, litter and miscellaneous debris. The street sweeper shall be equipped with dual gutter brooms, and vacuum equipment may be used. If any sand is tracked outside the parking lot, these areas (including city streets) must also be cleaned weekly with a street sweeper.

V. The property owners shall pay all inspection and plan check fees as required by the City.

VI. Plans and specifications for the project shall be approved by the City Engineer in addition to approvals from the Director of Planning as may be required and shall substantially conform to the plans submitted by the Applicants. All bluff stabilization devices shall produce a natural appearing bluff to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Community development director. Project implementation shall provide a final product mimicking a naturally appearing bluff in terms of colors, textures, forms and angles.

VII. A grading/drainage plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with the current Grading Ordinance and be submitted to the City Engineer for approval and permit issuance. Prior to issuance of the engineering permit, the contractor shall provide a plan for the method and means by which the workers will be performing the bluff repair and revegetation activities. A clear zone along the beach directly below the project site shall be designated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

VIII. The Applicants shall post with the City a Performance Bond equal to the full amount of the work to be completed to guarantee that once started, construction will be completed per approved plans.

IX. The Applicants shall submit a Certificate of Insurance naming the City of Solana Beach as an additional insured in the amount of $2,000,000 on a policy of general liability insurance issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in California, and meeting the requirements established by City Council resolution for insurance companies doing business with the City, covering injuries to persons and property during the construction period.

Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

X. If access from the beach is required, the Applicants shall obtain a Special Use (Marine Safety) Permit specifying conditions governing use of the Fletcher Cove Beach Access Ramp, and entry upon and use of areas of the public beach for construction equipment and vehicles.

Evidence of permit issuance shall be submitted to the City Engineer before issuance of the permit for the project.

XI. If access from the beach is required, the Applicants shall have on file evidence from the Marine Safety Department and the City Engineer that arrangements have been made to satisfy the following criteria:
a. Prior to usage of the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove ramp or parking lot, a cash deposit, bond or other secured agreement to cover the following impact charges shall be deposited:
i. A six-dollar ($6.00) per round trip vehicle charge for all construction related vehicles using the ramp.
ii. A three-dollar ($3.00) per ton fee, or less if approved by the City Council, based on the estimated weight of the vehicle and load for all vehicles in excess of ¾ ton capacity, excluding any vehicles solely transporting beach grade replenishment sand. iii. A thirty-one dollar ($31) per day charge for the first 30 days escalating to fifty-seven dollars ($57) per day for the 31st and subsequent days charge shall be collected to encourage a timely completion of all projects, unless otherwise modified for good cause by the City Council or City Manager.
iv. Any damage caused to the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove Ramp and parking lot.
b. For projects using the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove Ramp, at least one City of Solana Beach Lifeguard shall be contracted, at the Applicants’ expense, through the Captain of Marine Safety, to monitor all activities in order to insure full compliance with the conditions of this permit. The lifeguard(s) shall be on duty at all times when any construction activity takes place. Additional lifeguards may be required at the discretion of the Captain of Marine Safety. In addition to the lifeguard staffing cost, the Applicant shall also pay a Marine Safety equipment use fee of fourdollar and sixty-four cents ($4.64) per hour, based on the number of the number of hours the lifeguards are contracted for the project. c. If construction access is from Fletcher Cove Park, precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to the beach access ramp during construction and repairs. If damage to the ramp occurs, it shall be Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

repaired to a condition equivalent to the condition at the start of construction activity to the satisfaction of the City of Solana Beach City Engineer. All City owned work areas including Fletcher Cove Park and access ramp shall be videotaped prior to the
commencement of the project. The videotape shall establish the “as-is” condition. In any areas missed by the videotape, the City Engineer will determine “as-is” condition.

If access is from the State Park at the north end of Solana Beach, precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to the hard layer of fossiliferous sandstone that forms the beach surface at the north end of the coastal bluffs. Such access may necessitate State approval. Proof of State approval shall be provided to the City Engineer before construction begins.

XII. Beach quality sand from the excavation for the proposed project shall be deposited and spread on the beach in front of this site unless unique and/or inappropriate conditions are encountered. The Applicants should reference this condition to other permitting agencies.

XIII. An encroachment permit from the Engineering Department is required if a crane, construction materials, etc. are envisioned to be stationed in the public right of way. The City does not guarantee that an encroachment permit will be approved.

XIV. A qualified, licensed, and insured contractor shall perform all required work as outlined by certified/registered engineering geologist or Registered Civil Engineer on the construction plans. Special and general notes on said plans shall be followed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or his designee.

XV. Lateral pedestrian and Marine Safety vehicular access through the construction area, shall be provided past the site at all times, subject to high tides and safety issues. A 30-foot wide safety/construction work zone shall be provided during work hours to separate the work zone from the open public beach.

XVI. No construction activities may occur on the beach during the busier recreational season, which is defined as the period between Memorial Day and Labor Day of any year. The contractor shall obtain approval from the City of Solana Beach Engineering and Marine Safety Departments regarding the use and timing of the Fletcher Cove parking lot and beach access ramp for all construction related access, staging and parking issues if such use becomes required.

XVII. Pursuant to SBMC Section 7.34.100, Construction hours are limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

p.m. on Saturday. No work is allowed on Sunday or holidays unless specifically approved pursuant to SBMC Section 7.34.100.B. Engines shall not be started, no construction-related materials shall be moved, or any other construction-related activities occur outside these hours.

Work is not permitted on the beach on Saturdays without the written approval of the City Manager.

Prior to Final Inspection of the project, the Applicants shall:

XVIII. Submit certification to the City Engineer from the Geotechnical Engineer and the Civil Engineer of Record for the project that they have inspected the project and certify that it was constructed per the approved plan, specifying the date of the plan.

XIX. The Applicants and/or contractor shall repair any damage caused to the Solana Beach property and facilities, including but not limited to, Fletcher Cove Ramp and parking lot to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

The Applicants shall provide for and adhere to the following Conditions:

XX. All development on the site shall substantially conform to the final Conditional Use Permit Plan approved by the City Council.

XXI. The property owner shall be responsible to immediately remove, in perpetuity, any graffiti or other markings should they appear on the project exterior face. If erosion exposes the steel rebar, the Applicants or their successor in interest shall arrange to apply a sculptor-coat of concrete over the exposed steel to match the natural bluff. The property owner shall be responsible for the removal of the structure or any portion thereof.

XXII. If requested by the City Manager or his designee, the property owner or their successor in interest shall install and maintain signage about unstable bluffs fronting their property.

XXIII. The Applicants shall provide “As-Built” plans and all certifications required to the City before the City will release the performance bond as indicated in condition VIII.

D. City Council Conditions:

I.

IV. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to SBMC 17.72.120(B) failure to satisfy any and all of the above- Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

mentioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SBMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1.18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

V. EXPIRATION
The Development Review Permit for the project shall expire 24 months from the date of this Resolution, unless the Applicants has obtained building permits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council according to SBMC 17.72.110.

VI. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Applicants shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney’s fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify the Applicants of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification.

In the event of such election, the Applicants shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Applicants regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Applicants shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by the Applicants.

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 22nd day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
Resolution 2024-061
MOD24-002
Alamo/Sivage/Stone

ABSENT: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ ______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 98-101

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA

BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A
352 FOOT LONG SEAWALL AND GEOGRID REINFORCED UPPER

SLOPE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE COASTAL BLUFF
ADJACENT TO 249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE ~
APPLICANT: BUZZ AND DIANA COLTON
CASE NO.: 17-88-25
- WHEREAS, Buzz and Diana Colton (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant1 have requested the issuance of a Special Use Pennlt pursuant to Title 17 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17 .62.080; and
WHEREAS, at the October 20, 1998 City Councr1 meeting, direction was given to expedite this pennit due to pubric health, safety and welfare Issues associated with the extremely rapid coastal bluff erosion; and •
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1998, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing;and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found on November 9, 1998, that the use of a sea wall and upper bluff retention structure was a specific action necessary to prevent an emergency and hence was exempt from CEQA pursuant to SecUon 15269(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence presented at the Public Hearing on this matter; Oral Communications infonnation presented during the October 20, and November 3, 1998 Coune11 Meeting; the Special Use Permit application, any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing;
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California does resolve as follows:

1. That the forgoing recitations are true and correct.

2. That the project is exempt from CEQA as an emergency pursuant to Section 15269(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

3. That the Special Use Permit for an approximately 352 foot long seawall and Geogrid reinforced upper slope is approved In substantial confonnance with Attachment 1 based upon the following Andings and subject to the followfng Conditions.

RESOLUTION NO. 98-..!Q!.

Page No. 2

4. FINDINGS:

A Pursuant 1o Section 17.62.0S0A of Trtfe 17, Zoning, of the Solana Beach Municipal "Code, the City Couool finds that __ _
I. An existing significant structure is threatened with imminent danger or destruction because of bluff erosion which occurs naturally, or which results or arises from circumstances which are not within the control of the property owners, and it is reasonably foreseeable that without the shoreline defense structure the threatened structure on the site will suffer structural damage.

The existing structure(s) are threatened with imminent danger or destruction because of bluff erosion resulting from the lack of protective sand beaches that allowed destructive storm waves from last winters El Nino stonns to erode as much as 15 feet of the lower sea cfdf, thereby undermining the upper terrace deposits and exposing the relatively clean sand at the base of this geologic unit.

The property owner has no control over the conditions resulting in the danger. It is reasonably foreseeable that without the proposed shoreline improvements, the structure at 261 Pacific Avenue, along with its neighbonng structures, will suffer structural damage.

The upper bluff is rapidly becoming undennined due to gentle breezes eroding the clean sands at the base of the terrace deposits. Continual loss of sand triggers upper-bluff failures totally unassociated with wave activity resulting in tens to hundreds of cubic yards of soil that will fall on the beach, creating a significant public hazard/nuisance that cannot be reasonably abated in another manner.

II. No other reasonably feasible method of stabilizing the coastal bluff will protect the existing structure, abate the nuisance or preserve the economically viable use of the property.

The slope is unstable and no other reasonably feasible methods exist for stabilizing the coastal bluff, for abating the nuisance, or for preserving the economically viable use of the property.

Ill. The property owner has taken reasonable steps to protect the property and significant structures by other means.

The property owner has taken reasonable steps to protect the property by utifalng proper dtalnage and respecting coastal bluff setbacks. There are no other s1eps to protect the property and/or the bluff-top structure by other means.

RESOLUTION NO. 98-101
Page No. 3
IV. The owners or prior owners did not aeate the necessity for the shoreline defense structure by unreasonably faffing to implement generally accepted erosion and drainage control measures or by otherwise unreasonably acting or failing'to act with respect to the property. ....

The project and location is 5,:t feet above Pacific Avenue, with an site drainage draining to this pubfJC street Neither th(! owners, nor prior owners, in any way adversely affected the stabiT,ty of the clean sand lens.

V. The location, size, design and operation characteristics of the proposed shoreline defense structure wm not adversely affect adjacent public or private property, natural resources, or pubrac use of the beach.

The dimension of the structure is such that it places a maximum 2-11'2-foot-thlck carved and colored, structural concrete skin on the existing face of the sea cflff, the location of which advance shoreward (by marine erosion) during last winters El Nino stonn season. In certain areas, the project will be located entirely on pn"vate property. In other areas, the wall will encroach on public properties to the minimum degree possible.

VI. The proposed shoreline defense structure will be:
a. The minimum measure necessary to provide a reasonable level of protection;
The proposed project is the minimum measure necessary to protect the clean sands exposed in the vertical scarp at the base of f!1e upper terrace deposits and to infill the upper-bluff failure in order to provide subadjacent lateral support to the bluff-top residences and remaining section of coastal bluff on either side of the faHure.
b. Construct and maintained to incorporate an earth-like appearance which wm resemble as dosefy as possible the natural color and texture of the adjacent bluffs;
The project has been conditioned to incorporate an earth-like appearance which will resemble as closely as possible the natural color and texture of the adjacent bluffs.
c. Constructed and maintained to reasonably confonn to the natural fonn of the bluff;
The proposed ptoJect has been conditioned to roasonably confonn to the natutal fonn of the bluff In color, texturo, and landscaping.

RESOLUTION NO. 98-101
Page No. 4
d. Placed at the most feasi~ land-ward location;
The waH will be a maximum of 2-112 feet In thickness and constructed contiguous with the face of the bluff and thus at the most land-ward ' possible 'location. ~ • ~ •
e. Appropriately landscaped and maintained to blend in with the existing environment
The proposed project has been conditioned to be appropriately landscaped and maintained to blend in with the existing environment.

VII. The shoreline defense structure will be located entirely on private property or, if the structure will be located partially or entirely on public property or property subject to a public trust all required pennits for construction or real property interests have been obtained, or will be obtained, from the appropriate public agency or agencies with jurisdiction and/or ownership.

The applicant I project is condwoned to obtain all necessary pennits and approvals from the Federal, State and local agencies.

VIII. The construction of the structure and reconstruction of the bluff face, if any, will not result in a usable area at the top of the bluff larger than existed on January 3, 1991 or extend the bluff-top edge seaward more than 10 feet from the bluff-top edge as it existed on January 3, 1991 as shown on the ortho-photo map of the city dated January 3, 1991 and on file in the planning department.

There will be no seaward encroachment of the bluff-top beyond that which existed on January 3, 1991.

IX. The project as approved or conditionally approved will not adversely affect the pubrte health, safety or welfare and will not unreasonably affect the • public use of the beach. Encroachments into the public beach shall be mitigated to the satisfaction of the city council.

Any restrictions on the use of the beach will be temporary during construction.

The project wilf benefit the publlc by placing 6,000 cubic yards of beach grade sand on the beach. The lack of a project may adversely affects the public health, safety and welfare of those using the beach.

B. Coastal Act (Publlc resources Code Section 30235). The proposed cfdf retaining wan Is required: (1) to protect the existing residence, which Is uniquely In danger from the mcent extensive upper bluff erosion, and (2) to protect the users of the /Jf!blic beach from the danger of faUlng toeks and earth due to further Imminent erosion.

RESOLUTION NO. 98- tot
Page No. 5
C. Pursuant to Government Code Section 865 to 867 (existing impending peril), an immunity will apply if the City has, on the basis of adequate evidence such as expert opinion or otherwise, found the existence of an impending pen7; detennined appropnate reme<il81 action to halt, stabtTae, or abate such impending perili;/:lnd has undertaken to implement such remealBI acllon.

5. CONDITIONS:

A. Prior to obtaining any building or grading permits pursuant to this Special Use Pennlt. the Applicant shall:

I. Prepare, execute and record a declaration of restrictions on real property approved by the City Attorney whereby the applicant or the applicant's successors in interest to the property will construct and maintain the seawalVcliff retaining wall in accordance with Conditions C.111 and C.N of this approval and in a manner so as to accommodate the continual erosion of the natural cliffs, as necessary.

II. Obtain required California Coastal Commission Permits prior to the issuance of any structure and grading pennits or present evidence that an emergency waiver has been granted.

Ill. Obtain any other pennlts or emergency waivers which may be required from State and Federal agencies including the State Lands Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

IV. Execute a waiver of all claims against the City of Solana Beach for Mure liability or damage resulting from pennission to build as granted under this permit. Said waiver shall be acknowtedged and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder.

V. Seawall key and tieback system shall be designed and shall provide appropriate data to confinn the submitted design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

VI. The property owner shall post securities to guarantee proper care and use of the Fletcher Cove ramp. No construction materials to be off-loaded on the ramp or at the end of the ramp.

VII. The property owners shall pay all inspection and plan check fees as required by the City. •
VIII. Plans and specifications for the project shaD be approved by the City Engineer In adadion to approvals from the Director of Planning.

RESOLUTION NO. 98- 101
~ Page No. 6
IX. A grading/drainage plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with the ament Grading Ordinance and be submitted to the City Engineer for approval and pennit Issuance.

T ~
X. Plans and specifications for the project shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal to the Engineering Department XI. The Applicant shall post with the -city a Perfonnance Bond equal to the full amount of the work to be completed to guarantee that once started, construction wrll be completed per approved plans.

XII. The Applicant shall submit a Certificate of Insurance naming the City of Solana Beach as an additional insured in the amount of $1,000,000 on a policy of general liabtlity insurance Issued by an insurance company flcensed to do business in Carrfomia, and meeting the requirements established by City Council resolution for insurance companies doing business with the City, covering injuries to persons and property during the construction period.

XIII. The Applicant shall obtain a Special Use Pennit from the Captain of Marine Safety and City Engineer specifying the conditions governing use vehides, use of the boat ramp, and entry upon and use of areas of the public beach for ronstruction equipment and vehides. Evidence of pennit issuance shall be submitted to the City Engineer before issuance of the pennit for the project.

XIV. The Applicant shall present evidence from the Captain of Marine Safety and City Engineer, City of Solana Beach, that arrangements have been made to satisfy the following criteria:
a. Prior to usage of the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove ramp or parking lot. a cash deposit. bond or other secured agreement to cover the following impact charges shall be deposited:
i. A five-<ioflar per round trip vehide charge for all construction related vehicles using the ramp.
ii. A ten-<iollar per ton fee based on the estimated weight of the vehide and load for all vehides in excess of ¾ ton capacity, exduding vehicles solely transporting the approximately 6,000 cubic yards of beach grade sand.
iii. A twenty-five dollar per day charge for the first week escalating the fifty dollars per day for the eighth and subsequent days charge shall be collected to encourage a timely completion of an projects.

Iv.Any damage caused to the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove ramp and parking lot.

RESOLUTION NO. 98- 101 p Page No. 7 -
b. Two City of Solana Beach Lifeguards shall be contracted, at the Appf,cant's expense, through the captain of Marine Safety to monitor all activities in order to insure tun compnance with the conditions of this pennit.

These lifeguards shall be on duty at all times when any construction;actMty takes place.
c. If construction access is from Plaza Street, precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to the beach access ramp located at Plaza Street during construction and repairs. If damage to the ramp occurs, it shall be repaired to a condition equivalent to the condition at the start of construction activity to the satisfaction of the City of Solana Beach Ctty Engineer.

If access if from the State Park at the north end of Solana Beach, precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to the hard layer of fossiliferous sandstone which forms the beach surface at the north end of the coastal bluffs. Such access may necessitate State approval. Proof of such access shall be provided to the City Engineer before construction begins. d. The applicant and/or contractor shall obtain a haul route pennlt from the City Engineering Department
XV. The Applicant shall as required by the City Attorney, either: (a) submit a complete application to merge the two tax assessor parcels into one legal lot to assure single ownership and responsibility of the seawall area; or (b) present evidence that a long-tern, maintenance agreement has been entered into between the property owners to insure the bluff property and seawall are property maintained.

8. Prior to Final Inspection of the project. the Applicant shall:

I. Submit certification to the City Engineer from the Geotechnical Engineer and the Civil Engineer or Record for the project that they have inspected the project and certify that It was constructed per the approved plan, specifying the date of the plan.

II. The applicant and/or contractor shall repair any damage caused to the Solana beach Fletcher Cove ramp and parking lot to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

C. The Applicant shall provide for and adhere to the following Conditions:

I. AR development on the site shaD substantially oonform to the final Special Use Pennft Plan approved by the Comroonlty Development Director.

RESOLUTION NO. 98· 101
Page No. 8
II. No construction activity shall be allowed within the period between Memorial Day and Labor Day in order to minimize potential impacts to recreational beach uses.
~
Ill. Shoreline Defense Structure:
a. The proposed shoreline defense structure will be:
i. The minimum measure necessary to provide a reasonable level of protection; and
ii. Constructed and maintained to incorporate an eartfHike appearance which will resemble as closely as possible the natural color and texture of the adjacent bluffs; and
iii. Constructed and maintained to reasonable confonn to the natural fonn of the bluff; and
iv. Placed at the most feasible land-ward location; and v. Appropriately landscaped and maintained to blend in with the existing environment
b. The shoreline defense structure will be located entirely on private property or, if the structure will be located partially or entirely on public property or property subject to a public trust. all required pennits for construction or real property interests have been obtained, or will be obtained, from the appropriate public agency or agencies with jurisdiction and/or ownership.
c. The construction of the structure and reconstruction of the bluff face, if any, will not result in a usable area at the top of the bluff larger than existed on January 3, 1991 or extend the bluff-top edge seaward more than 10 feet from the bluff-top edge as it existed on January 3, 1991 as shown on the ortho-photo map of the City dated January 3, 1991 and on file in the Planning Department.

IV. The property owner shall be responsible to immediately remove, in perpetuity, any graffiti or other markings should they appear on the project exterior face.

D. The Special Use Pennit for the project will expire on November 9, 1999 unless the Appficant has obtained necessary pennits and has commenced construction prior to that date, and dHigentfy pursues construction to completion.

An extension of the Special Use Pennit may be granted by the City Council.

RESOLUTION NO. 99.101
Page No. 9
E. NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exerutions described In this resolution commen~ on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the impositioD of any fees, dedications, reservations or other exaction's described in this resolution, you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020. Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Ordinance.

Adjourned PASSED AND ADOPTED at ft regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 9th day of November, 1998, by the following vote.

AYES: Councilmembers - Campbell, Dodson, Kellejian, Tompkins NOES: Councilmembers - None
ABSENT: Councilmembers - None
ABSTAINED: Councilmembers - None
- . ···--~:~.~
ATTEST:

KIRK, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(Z_c..&~==::'.Ul.::::A~A:!::::::. ~Bt-:~~:;;i.E~~~. ~C~ity=..:::A::::::tto..::m::::e=y==---, PAUL S. TOMPKINS, Mayor

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNlY OF SAN DIEGO

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
)
)
)
ss
I, Katniyn A Kirk. City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach, do hereby celtify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 98-101 duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Couna1 at a Adjourned Regular meeting of the Solana Beach City Counca1 held on the 9th day of November, 199~.

Executed this 9th day of November, 1998.
~4?'4
Kathrynrk.City Clerk
(SEAL)
RESOLUTION 2014-111

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT FOR
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF AN EXISTING 352-FOOT

LONG TIED BACK SEAWALL LOCATED AT THE BASE OF
THE LOWER COASTAL BLUFF BELOW 249-311 PACIFIC
AVENUE.

APPLICANT: Terry Lingenfelder
CASE NO.: 17-13-33 DRP
WHEREAS, Terry Lingenfelder (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant") has submitted an application for a Development Review Permit (DRP) pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning), of the Solana Beach Municipal Code (SBMC); and WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted a Seawall Monitoring Report prepared by TerraCosta Consulting Group on November 22, 2013, which has been reviewed and confirmed by Geopacifica Geotechnical Consultants (Geopacifica), the City's third party independent geotechnical consultant, in a final revision dated February 19, 2014, entitled Review of Request for Seawall Repair 249-311, Solana Beach, CA. indicating that maintenance and repair of the existing seawall at the property is required; and WHEREAS, at the duly noticed public hearing held on August 27, 2014, the City Council received and considered evidence concerning the proposed application as received; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was conducted pursuant to the provisions of Solana Beach Municipal Code Section 17.72.030; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach found the application request exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA guidelines sections 15301 (d); and
WHEREAS, the proposed maintenance will be designed and constructed to maximize the natural, aesthetic appeal and scenic beauty of the beach and bluff by the reapplication of color coating to match the surrounding seawalls and exposed bluffs; and
WHEREAS, this decision is based upon the evidence contained in the subject application, testimony of Geopacifica, evidence presented at the hearing and any information the City Council gathered by viewing the site and the area as disclosed at the hearing.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:
1 . That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.

Resolution 2014-1 11
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

2. That the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to 2013 State California CEQA Guidelines 15301 (d).

3. That the request for a Development Review Permit for the maintenance and repair of an existing 352-foot tied-back seawall along the coastal bluff below the properties at 249-311 Pacific Avenue is conditionally approved based upon the following Findings and subject to the following Conditions:

4. FINDINGS
A. In accordance with Section 17.68.040 (Development Review Permit) of the City of Solana Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the following:

I. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of SBMC Title 17 (Zoning Ordinance), including special regulations, overlay zones and specific plans.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan land use designation of Medium-Density Residential, which allows for the development of single and multiple-family developments at a density of 5-7 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan as it encourages the development and maintenance of healthy residential neighborhoods, the stability of transitional neighborhoods, and the rehabilitation of deteriorated neighborhoods. The project could be found to be consistent with these criteria because the scope of the project will maintain the existing use of the single-family residences currently developed on the associated properties.

Zoning Ordinance Consistency: The proposed project is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17) (SBMC

17.48.040), and delineates Permitted Uses and Structures (SBMC Section 17.20.020), and provides for uses of the properties for a singlefamily residences. Further, the proposed project adheres to all property development regulations established for the Medium Residential (MR) Zone which allows for the development of a multi-family development at a density of 5-7 dwelling units per acre.

The project does not propose any development changes that would affect existing yard dimensions, maximum FAR, and parking regulations. No increases to the existing height or existing setbacks would occur with project implementation. The west end of the property along the coastal bluff is located within the HOZ. SBMC Section 17.48.020 states the purpose of the HOZ regulations is to: restrict grading of natural slopes with an inclination of 25 percent of greater, in order to preserve the natural topography and scenic qualities of the City; protect native coastal Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

sage/chaparral and grassland habitat; preserve existing watersheds; and reduce the potential for environmental hazards.

II. The proposed development complies with the following development review criteria set forth in Solana Beach Municipal Code Section

17.68.040.F:
a. Relationship with Adjacent Land Uses: The development shall be designed in a manner compatible with and where feasible, complimentary to existing and potential development in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Site planning on the perimeter of the development shall give consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects, as well as protection of the property from adverse surrounding influences.

The project is for the maintenance and repair of an existing seawall located at the base of the lower coastal bluff. The proposed project does not modify the land use or relationship with adjacent land uses. No adverse effects upon neighboring properties have been identified or are anticipated to occur from the project implementation. As conditioned, the proposed project gives consideration to the protection of surrounding areas from potential adverse effects and provides protection of the property from adverse surrounding influences.
b. Building and Structure Placement: Buildings and structures shall be sited and designed in a manner which visually and functionally enhances their intended use.

No buildings are proposed. The proposed repairs will include the reapplication of at least 6 inches of sacrificial concrete to cover the lower 14 to 18 feet of the wall in order to cover the exposed anchor heads and erosional markers. The concrete will also fill any concave depressions formed in the wall as a result of cobble induced abrasion. The damaged plastic
anchor heads will be replaced and the color coating will be reapplied to match the surrounding seawalls and exposed bluff constructed and maintained to incorporate an earth-like appearance, which will resemble, as closely as possible, the color and texture of the surrounding bluffs.
c. Landscaping: The removal of significant native vegetation shall be minimized. Replacement vegetation and landscaping shall be compatible with the vegetation of the surrounding area.

Trees and other large plantings shall not obstruct significant views when installed or at maturity.

Resolution 2014-11 1
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

The project, as proposed, is for the maintenance and repair of an existing seawall and no landscaping is proposed. If the Applicant decided to process a permit tor upper bluff
landscaping at a later date, they will be conditioned to provide native, non-invasive, drought tolerant, fire-resistant and salt tolerant species. A landscaping plan would be required at that time.
d. Roads, Pedestrian Walkways, Parking and Storage Areas: Any development involving more than one building or structure shall provide common access roads and pedestrian walkways.

Parking and outside storage areas, where permitted, shall be screened from view, to the extent feasible, by existing topography, by the placement of buildings and structures, or by landscaping and plantings.

No modification to roads, pedestrian walkways or parking or storage areas is proposed by this project. Common access roads and pedestrian walkways are not required. No additional parking or outside storage areas are proposed.
e. Grading: To the extent feasible, natural topography and scenic features of the site shall be retained and incorporated into the proposed development. Any grading or earth-moving
operations in connection with the proposed development shall be planned and executed so as to blend with the existing terrain both on and adjacent to the site. Existing exposed or disturbed slopes shall be landscaped with native or naturalized non-native vegetation and existing erosion problems shall be corrected.

There is no proposed grading or building on site as shown on the proposed plans. Any sand that is removed to maintain and repair the bottom of the existing seawall will be replaced once the work is complete.
f. Lighting: Light fixtures for walkways, parking areas, driveways, and other facilities shall be provided in sufficient number and at proper locations to assure safe and convenient nighttime use.

All light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded so that no light or glare is transmitted or reflected in such concentrated quantities or intensities as to be detrimental to the surrounding areas per SBMC 17.60.060 (Exterior Lighting Regulations).

The project does not involve exterior lighting improvements; however, in the event these improvements do occur, the
project is conditioned for consistency with the City's Exterior Lighting Regulations in that all new exterior lighting fixtures Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

shall be in conformance with the Citywide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC 17.60.060).
g. Usable Open Space: Recreational facilities proposed within required usable open space shall be located and designed to maintain essential open space values.

The project consists of the maintenance and repair of an existing seawall, therefore, usable open space and recreational facilities are neither proposed nor required according to SBMC Section 17.20.040.
/II. All required permits and approvals including variances, conditional use permits, comprehensive sign plans, and coastal development permits have been obtained prior to or concurrently with the development review permit. •
All required permits are being processed concurrently with the Development Review Permit or have already been obtained. As a condition of project approval, the Applicant is required to obtain a permit from the California Coastal Commission prior to building/grading permit issuance.

5. CONDITIONS
Prior to use or development of the property in reliance on this permit, the Applicant shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

A. Community Development Department Conditions:

I. The Applicant shall pay required Public Facilities Fees, as established by SBMC Section 17.72.020 and Resolution 1997-36.

II. Building Permit plans must be in substantial conformance with the plans presented to the City Council on August 27, 2014 and located in the project file with a submittal date of October 22, 2013.

Ill. The Applicant shall obtain required California Coastal Commission (CCC) approval of a Coastal Development Permit, Waiver or Exemption as determined necessary by the CCC, prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.

IV. The repairs to will be constructed and maintained to incorporate an earth-like appearance, which will resemble, as closely as possible, the color and texture of the surrounding bluffs.

V. The Coastal Structure shall be maintained and repaired on an "as Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

needed" basis to ensure continued compatibility with the color, texture and topography of the contiguous areas, and to ensure that all surrounding areas are kept safe. The Coastal Structure shall be subject to periodic inspection by officers or agents of the City to determine compliance with the terms and conditions of this Resolution.

VI. In order to show compliance with LUP Policy 4.26, the Applicant shall remove or cap any permanent irrigation system within 100 feet of the bluff edge, unless the Applicant demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, or the CCC if the project is appealed, that such irrigation has no material impact on bluff erosion.

VII. All bluff property landscaping shall consist of native, non-invasive, drought-tolerant, fire-resistant, and salt-tolerant species.

VIII. Any new exterior lighting fixtures shall be in conformance with the Citywide Lighting Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance (SBMC

17.60.060).

IX. Should mitigation fees be imposed as part of the CDP process for the proposed maintenance or during the assessment of the project in accordance with LUPA policy 4.48.C, the City shall receive payment of mitigation fees for the mitigation of adverse impacts to public access and recreational use resulting from the subject shoreline protective devices
B. Engineering Department Conditions: Prior to obtaining any building or grading permits pursuant to this colored concrete seawall maintenance project, the Applicant shall:

I. Prepare, execute and record a declaration of restrictions on real property approved by the City Attorney whereby the Applicant or the Applicant's successors in interest to the property will construct and maintain the shoreline defense structure in accordance with Conditions of this approval.

II. Execute a waiver of all claims against the City of Solana Beach for future liability or damage resulting from permission to build as granted under this permit. Said waiver shall be acknowledged and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder.

Ill. Obtain required California Coastal Commission Permits prior to the issuance of any structure and grading permits or present evidence that an emergency waiver has been granted.

Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

IV. Obtain any other permits or emergency waivers, which may be required, from State and Federal agencies including the State Lands Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

V. The project shall be designed and shall provide appropriate data to confirm the submitted design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

This shall include, but is not a limited to, a geotechnical report.

VI. The property owners shall post securities to guarantee proper care and use of the Fletcher Cove ramp. No construction materials to be off-loaded on the ramp, at the end of the ramp or any public property including streets and Fletcher Cove Park. No washing of equipment shall occur unless a containment system is properly utilized.

VII. For all projects on which equipment is driven on the Fletcher Cove Beach Access Ramp, the access ramp and adjacent parking lot must be swept daily to remove sand that has been tracked onto the Ramp and parking lot. At least once a week, the access ramp and parking lot must be swept with a street sweeper that is capable of cleaning the streets and parking lots of paper, glass, dirt, silt, sand, rocks, litter and miscellaneous debris. The street sweeper shall be equipped with dual gutter brooms and vacuum equipment may be used. If any sand is tracked outside the parking lot, these areas (including City. streets) must also be cleaned weekly with a street sweeper.

VIII. The property owners shall pay all inspection and plan check fees as required by the City.

IX. Plans and specifications for the project shall be approved by the City Engineer in addition to approvals from the Director of Planning as may be required, and shall substantially conform to the plans submitted by the Applicant. All bluff stabilization devices shall produce a natural appearing bluff to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. Project implementation shall provide a final product mimicking a naturally appearing bluff in terms of colors, textures, forms and angles.

X. A grading/drainage plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with the current Grading Ordinance and be submitted to the City Engineer for the approval and permit issuance.

XI. Plans and specifications for the project shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to submittal to the Engineering Department.

XII. The Applicant shall post with the City a Performance Bond equal to the full amount of the work to be completed to guarantee that once started, construction will be completed per plans.

Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

XIII. The Applicant shall submit a Certificate of Insurance naming the City of Solana Beach as an additional insured in the amount of $1,000,000 on a policy of general liability insurance issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in California, and meeting the requirements established by City Council resolution for insurance companies doing business with the City covering injuries to persons and property during the construction period.

XIV. The Applicant shall obtain a Special Use (Marine Safety) Permit specifying the conditions governing use of vehicles, use of the access ramp, and entry upon and use of areas of the public beach for construction equipment and vehicles. Evidence of permit issuance shall be submitted to the City Engineer before issuance of the permit for the project.

XV. The Applicant shall have on file evidence from the Captain of Marine Safety and the City Engineer of the City of Solana Beach that arrangements have been made to satisfy the following criteria:
a. Prior to the usage of the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove Ramp or parking lot, a cash deposit, bond or other secured
agreement to cover the following impact charges shall be deposited:
i. A five-dollar and thirty-cents ($5.30) per round trip vehicle charge for all construction related vehicles using the
ramp.
ii. A two-dollar and seventy cents ($2. 70) per ton fee, or less if approved by the City Council, based on the
estimated weight of the vehicle and load for all vehicles in excess of ¾ ton capacity, excluding any vehicles solely transporting beach grade replenishment sand.
iii. A twenty-seven dollar ($27) per day charge for the first 30 days escalating to fifty-three dollars ($53) per day for the 31 st and subsequent days charge shall be collected to encourage a timely completion of all projects, unless
otherwise modified for good cause by the City Council or City Manager.
iv. Any damage caused to the Solana Beach Fletcher Cove Ramp and parking lot.
b. At least one City of Solana Beach Lifeguard shall be contracted, at the Applicant's expense, through the Captain of Marine Safety, to monitor all activities in order to ensure full compliance with the condition of this permit. The
Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

lifeguard(s) shall be on duty at all times when any
construction activity takes place. Additional lifeguards may be required at the discretion of the Captain of Marine Safety.

In addition to the lifeguard staffing cost, the Applicant shall also pay a Marine Safety equipment use fee of four dollars and sixty-four cents ($4.64) per hour, based on the number of hours the lifeguards are contracted for the project. c. If construction access is from Fletcher Cove Park,
precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to the beach access ramp during construction and repairs. If damage to the ramp occurs, it shall be repaired to a condition equivalent to the condition at the start of construction activity to the satisfaction of the City of Solana Beach City Engineer. All City owned work areas including Fletcher Cove Park and
access ramp shall be videotaped prior to the
commencement of the project. The videotape shall establish the "as-is" condition. In any areas missed by the videotape, the City Engineer will determine the "as-is" condition.

If access is from the State Park at the north end of Solana Beach, precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to the hard layer of fossiliferous sandstone that forms the beach surface at the north end of the coastal bluffs. Such access may necessitate State approval. Proof of such access shall be provided to the City Engineer before construction begins.

XVI. Beach quality sand from the excavation for the proposed project shall be deposited and spread on the beach in front of this site unless unique and/or inappropriate conditions are encountered.

The Applicant should reference this condition to other permitting agencies.

XVII. An encroachment permit form the Engineering Department is required if a crane, construction materials, etc. are envisioned to be stationed in the public right of way. The City does not guarantee that an encroachment permit will be approved.

XVIII. Any grout mixture used on the project that may be visible from the beach or surrounding areas. Color samples shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to placing the grout.

XIX. The structure and any exposed construction shall mimic the natural contours, color and texture to the maximum extent practicable, as determined by the City Engineer and Community Development Director.

Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder
Page10of12
XX. A carved, colored, and textured fa9ade on the face of the structure matching the adjacent bluff areas shall be constructed. The fa9ade shall match the contours, both vertically and horizontally, and the texture of the adjacent natural bluffs to the maximum extent feasible. Coastal bluff colored grouting shall be used and shall be submitted to the City Engineer before approval of the plans. A test prism shall be cast and delivered to a testing lab during construction.

XXI. A qualified, licensed and insured contractor shall perform all required work as outlined by certified/registered engineering geologist or a registered civil engineer on the construction plans.

Special and general notes on said plans shall be followed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or his designee.

XXII. Lateral pedestrian and Marine Safety vehicular access through the construction area shall be provided past the site at all times, subject to high tides and safety issues. A 30-foot wide safety/ construction work zone shall be provided during work hours to separate the work zone from the open public beach.

XXIII. No construction activities may occur on the beach during the busier recreation season, which is defined as the period between Memorial Day and Labor Day of any year. The contractor shall obtain approval from the City of Solana Beach Engineering and Marine Safety Departments regarding the use and timing of the Fletcher Cove parking lot and beach access ramp for all construction related access, staging and parking lot issues if such use becomes required.

C. Prior to final inspection of the project, the Applicant shall:

I. Submit certification to the City Engineer from the Geotechnical Engineer and the Civil Engineer of Record for the project that they have inspected the project and certify that it was constructed per the approved plan, specifying the date of the plan.

11. The Applicant and/or contractor shall repair any damage caused to the Solana Beach property and facilities including, but not limited to, Fletcher Cove Ramp and parking lot to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

D. The Applicant shall provide for and adhere to the following conditions:

I. All development on the site shall substantially conform to the final Conditional Use Permit Plan approved by the City Council.

Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific• Lingenfelder

II. The property owner shall be responsible to immediately remove, in perpetuity, any graffiti or other markings should they appear on the project exterior face. If erosion exposes the steel rebar, the Applicant or their successor in interest shall arrange to apply a sculptor-coat of concrete over the exposed steel to match the natural bluff. The property owner shall be responsible for the removal of the structure or any portion thereof.

Ill. If requested by the City Manager or his designee, the property owner or their successor in interest shall install and maintain signage about unstable bluffs fronting their property.

IV. The Applicant shall provide "As-Built" plans and all certification required to the City, before the City will release the performance bond as indicated in condition 1 .XII.

V. Pursuant to SSMC Section 7.34.100, Construction hours are limited to 7:00a.m. to 7:00p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00a.m. on Saturday. No work is allowed on Sunday or holidays unless specifically approved pursuant to SBMC Section 7.34.100.B.

Engines shall not be started, no construction-related materials shall be moved, or any other construction-related activities occur outside these hours. Work is not permitted on the beach on Saturdays without the written approval of the City Manager.

6. ENFORCEMENT: Pursuant to SSMC 17.72.120(8) failure to satisfy any and all of the above-mentioned conditions of approval is subject to the imposition of penalties as set forth in SSMC Chapters 1.1.6 and 1 .18 in addition to any applicable revocation proceedings.

7. EXPIRATION: The Development Review Permit for the project will expire on August 27, 2016, unless the Applicant has obtained building permits and commenced construction prior to that date, and diligently pursued construction to completion. An extension of the application may be granted by the City Council.

8. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT: The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, applicant shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Resolution 2014-111
249-311 Pacific - Lingenfelder

applicant regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by applicant.

9. NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020, you are hereby notified that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution commences on the effective date of this resolution. To protest the imposition of any fee, dedications, reservations or other exactions described in this resolution you must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020.

Generally the resolution is effective upon expiration of the tenth day following the date of adoption of this resolution, unless the resolution is appealed or called for review as provided in the Solana Beach Zoning Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, held on the 2ih day of August, 2014, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Councilmembers - Campbell, Heebner, Zito, Zahn, Nichols Councilmembers - None
Councilmembers - None
Councilmembers - None
THOMAS M. C
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) SS.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH)
I, ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 2014-111 conditionally approving a Development Review Permit at 249-311 Pacific Ave, Case No. 17-13-33, Applicant: Lingenfelder as duly passed and adopted at a Regular Solana Beach City Council meeting held on the 2?1h day of August 2014 and the original is on file in t!J~_City_CJerk's Office.
/J , /--- -,
Date of this Certification: 1-1;., c}-e,-f rf
I

GEOTECHNICAL

ENVIRONMENTAL

WATER RESOURCES

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

COASTAL/MARINE GEOTECHNICS
3890 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 573-6900 Fax (858) 573-8900 www.engeo.com
Project No.

T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Ms. Diana Lilly
California Coastal Commission
7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103
San Diego, California 92108
Subject: 249-311 Pacific Avenue
Solana Beach, California

SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT
Permit Reference: California Coastal Commission; CDP No. 6-99-100 (249-311 Pacific Avenue) and CDP No. 6-13-0437 (249 Pacific Avenue seawall extension) Dear Ms. Lilly:

In accordance with Special Condition No. 3 of Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 6-99-100 and Special Condition No. 6 of CDP No. 6-13-0437, we are submitting this monitoring report. The purpose of this report is to provide a current evaluation of the performance of the seawall at 249- 311 Pacific Avenue, and its southerly extension at 249 Pacific Avenue.

This report contains our opinion of trends, the differential retreat of the upper bluff materials and any significant weathering or damage to the seawall below, as required by Special Conditions Nos. 2 and 3 as mentioned above. Our opinions are based on comparison of current measurements and observations made at the residences of 249 through 319 Pacific Avenue to those reported in our previous monitoring reports. The original baseline report for CDP No. 6-99- 100 was submitted March 31, 2003, with follow-up reports submitted June 3, 2005, and November 22, 2013.

This report represents our fourth monitoring report for the seawall at 249-311 Pacific Avenue (CDP No. 6-99-100), and our initial baseline report for the seawall extension below 249 Pacific Avenue (CDP No. 6-13-0437). Measurements and observations of the upper bluff edge for these eight properties were performed on May 19, 2022. Due to high sand levels at that time, measurements and observations of the seawall below were not able to be completed until April 26, 2023.

PROJECT BACKGROUND AND MONITORING HISTORY
The 249-311 Pacific Avenue project was initiated in October 1998 with an Emergency Permit application to the Coastal Commission for construction of a 352-foot-long, 35 foot-high, 2 1/2 footthick, tied-back seawall following the coastal bluff failure that occurred on September 30, 1998.

The most significant bluff retreat occurred in the vicinity of 261 Pacific Avenue as a result of the . The Coastal
Commission issued an Emergency Permit in April 1999 for a 90-foot portion of the seawall, built ENGEO
-Expect Excellence----------------------
accelerated erosion that occurred during the previous winter's El Nirio storm season California Coastal Commission T1831.H01.001
249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 17, 2023
SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT Page 2
early that summer, followed by a February 2000 Emergency Permit to construct the remaining 260± feet of seawall. The wall structure itself was completed in the early summer of 2000, while architectural finishing was completed in December 2000. Upper-bluff reconstruction in the vicinity of 261 Pacific Avenue was also near completion by the end of the year, more than two years after the initial Emergency Permit request was submitted to Coastal Commission Staff.

The baseline monitoring report for this wall was submitted to Coastal Commission Staff on March 31, 2003. An updated monitoring report was submitted on June 3, 2005. Maintenance work on the seawall was performed in 2006 to address issues noted in the 2005 monitoring report.

Additional maintenance of the 352-foot-long was approved by Coastal Commission staff under the amended CDP No. 6-05-095-A1 and completed in April 2017. Maintenance consisted of the reapplication of 6-9 inches of sacrificial concrete covering the lower 14-18 feet of the wall. An as- - prepared by TerraCosta Consulting Group, Inc., and submitted to the Coastal Commission on June 7, 2017.

Since the initial construction of the 249-311 Pacific Avenue seawall only protected the northerly half of the bluff at 249 Pacific Avenue, significant erosion of the bluff continued on the unprotected portion of this property. Construction of the 24-foot long by 35-foot high tied-back seawall extension below 249 Pacific Avenue was approved under CDP 6-13-0437 and completed in March 2015. This report will also serve as the baseline monitoring report for the southern portion of the seawall as described above.

In addition, while performing field observations of the seawalls it was discovered that the maintenance performed under CDP No. 6-05-095-A1 covered the existing monitoring pins for the wall from 249-311 Pacific Avenue with the colored sacrificial concrete. Because of this discovery we were obligated to install new monitoring pins along the full length of the seawall, ultimately making this report a new baseline for entire length of the seawall from 249-311 Pacific Avenue.

MONITORING PROCEDURES
This monitoring report follows the procedures set forth in the Coastal Commission-approved proposal for seawall monitoring and is composed of the following four parts:

Visual evaluation of current condition and performance of seawall; Measurements of seawall abrasion and natural bluff retreat; Visual evaluation of any progressive erosion of the upper sloping surface; and Measurements of distance from residences to bluff edge.

This monitoring survey was conducted on two occasions. The upper-bluff survey was performed on May 19, 2022, and the seawall portion was completed on April 26, 2023.

Monitoring procedures consisted of visually evaluating and describing the seawall and bluff-top areas; measuring the seawall using permanent steel monitoring pins installed in the seawall as reference points; and, finally, measuring the top of the bluff using reference points along the westfacing side of each residence. Bluff-top reference locations are shown on Figure 1. Seawall monitoring pin locations are shown on Figures 1 through 4. A few of the bluff-top monitoring points have been destroyed over time, as indicated on Figure 1 and new points acquired. No previously installed seawall monitoring pins could be reacquired for comparative measurements along the seawall, so ten new steel pins from 249-319 Pacific Avenue were installed to establish a baseline against which to measure erosional changes of the architectural wall face. built report titled "Seawall Maintenance, 249 311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California," was •
•
•
•
California Coastal Commission T1831.H01.001
249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 17, 2023
SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT Page 3
We have provided photographs with written descriptions of the general condition of the contiguous seawalls, including color, texture, observable erosion, and any observed separation between the seawall and an adjacent seawall.

VISUAL EVALUATION OF SEAWALL CONDITION AND PERFORMANCE
This report evaluates the two contiguous seawalls constructed and/or maintained in separate sections comprised of the southern half of 311 Pacific Avenue down to the northern half of 249 Pacific Avenue, and the southerly section below the southern half of 249 Pacific Avenue.

These two walls were constructed to blend together in a natural manner without a noticeable contact point to draw the beach-goers attention.

Visual inspection of the seawalls in general reveals negligible surficial changes since construction of the northern and southern portions, or the 2017 maintenance of the central portion. Our current site inspection reveals little apparent surficial distress or deep-seated structural distress.

Photos 1 through 6 show the overall condition of the exposed portions of the seawalls at the time of this survey above approximate elevation 7.5 to 10 feet (MSL). As can be seen in the photographs, except for minor typical weathering and efflorescence, visual inspection revealed no apparent distress or any indications suggestive of structural distress that would affect the integrity of the seawall.

VISUAL EVALUATION OF UPPER SLOPING BLUFF SURFACE
Photos 7 through 16 illustrate the amount of surficial erosion and sloughing that has occurred on the face of the upper bluff since 2013. In particular, our comparative review of Photos 11 and 14 indicate that surficial (rill) erosion of the geogrid-reinforced fill slope below 255, 261 and 265 Pacific Avenue continues to occur due in part to the lack of protective vegetative cover. As indicated in Photos 13 and 14, erosion gullies have developed along the grid-reinforced fill/formational bluff contact below 255 Pacific Avenue. Photos 17 through 32 provide a chronologic comparison of the upper bluff condition, which appears to remain largely unchanged since the previous monitoring report.

MEASUREMENTS OF SEAWALL ABRASION
For the two contiguous seawalls, vertical and horizontal profiles have been prepared using the monitoring pins as reference points. The results of vertical and horizontal profiles for each wall are shown on Figures 2 through 7. It should be noted that the vertical profiles terminate at the back-beach elevation that was present on March 26, 2023, the date of the survey.

Using the newly installed monitoring pins as a baseline against which to measure the contiguous seawalls, we have developed horizontal profiles of the seawall at the new pin locations. Horizontal profiles were measured using a conventional 100-foot tape laid at sand level against the base of the exposed seawall or at pin elevation, depending on what conditions would allow. Horizontal offsets were measured from the seawall face to the intersection of the measuring tape using a folding rule. Vertical profiles were measured using a construction level as a vertical reference point with a tape measure to determine horizontal offset.

As this report has become the new baseline by which to measure future seawall erosion, no conclusions can be drawn at this point as to the rate of erosion of the sacrificial concrete placed during maintenance completed in 2017. It should be noted that future reports are expected to California Coastal Commission T1831.H01.001
249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 17, 2023
SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT Page 4
reveal that the erosion rate will likely not be uniform over the entire exposed surface of the seawalls, but is expected to occur in random, localized areas.

DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS FROM RESIDENCE TO BLUFF EDGE
As stated previously, and as indicated on Figure 1, reference locations have been established along the rear-facing foundation of each residence for monitoring any bluff-top retreat. Photos 15 through 30 show overall views of the rear yards of the subject properties comparing any bluff-top changes between November 4, 2013, and May 19, 2022. As seen in these photographs, essentially only minor changes to the bluff top have occurred.

The following table summarizes our measurements of the distance from the approximate monitoring reference points to the top-of-bluff. Numbers shown in bold italics represent monuments that have been obliterated since the 2005 survey and are included for informational purposes only.

California Coastal Commission T1831.H01.001
249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 17, 2023
SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT Page 5
Property
Address/Pin # 2005 (ft) 2013 (ft) 2022 (ft)
Total Change
Since 2005 (ft)
311 Pacific Ave
1 9.1 8.05 7.7 (1.4)
1a 10.9 9.7 9.7 (1.2)
2 12.0 11.1 11.1 (0.9)
3 8.8 5.8 5.8 (3.0)
3a 9.5 7.95 7.95 (1.55)
4 11.0 10.55 10.55 (0.45)
5 13.35 13.35 13.35 0
6 14.5 14.3 14.3 (0.2)
309 Pacific Ave
7 13.9 13.9 13.9 0
8 15.9 15.9 15.9 0
9 11.2 11.2 11.2 0
10 13.1 12.8 12.8 (0.3)
11 13.4 13.4 13.4 0
12 13.4 -- -- -- 301 Pacific Ave
13 10.0 10.0 10.0 0
14 9.8 9.8 9.8 0
15 25.4 25.4 25.4 0
16 26.8 26.8 26.8 0
17 28.8 28.8 28.8 0
18 29.3 28.0 28.0 (1.3)
269 Pacific Ave
19 20.5 20.1 20.1 (0.4)
20 16.4 16.4 16.4 0
21 11.6 10.1 10.1 (1.5)
22 12.0 11.7 11.7 (0.3)
23 12.3 12.3 12.3 0
24 18.3 -- -- --
California Coastal Commission T1831.H01.001
249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 17, 2023
SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT Page 6
Property
Address/Pin # 2005 (ft) 2013 (ft) 2022 (ft)
Total Change
Since 2005 (ft)
265 Pacific Ave
25 23.5 23.5 23.5 0
26 25.5 25.5 25.5 0
27 21.5 21.5 21.5 0
28 20.0 20.0 20.0 0
29 20.6 20.6 20.6 0
30 11.2 11.2 11.2 0
261 Pacific Ave
31 27.1 27.1 27.1 0
32 27.1 27.1 27.1 0
32 27.1 27.1 27.1 0
34 29.1 29.1 29.1 0
35 10.5 10.5 10.5 0
255 Pacific Ave
36 25.9 25.9 25.9 0
37 23.2 23.2 23.2 0
38 22.7 22.7 22.7 0
39 22.5 22.5 22.5 0
40 14.5 14.4 14.4 (0.1)
249 Pacific Ave
41 -- -- -- -- 42 21.0 20.6 20.6 (0.4)
43 24.0 24.0 -- -- 43a -- -- 25.5 -- 44 26.0 26.0 -- -- 45 25.2 25.2 -- -- 45a -- -- 25.7 -- 46 24.1 24.1 -- -- As indicated by the measurements in the table, approximately 3.0 feet of loss behind 311 Pacific Avenue is the most significant recession that has occurred along the top-of-bluff since 2005. It should be noted that the distance measurement to the top-of-bluff is somewhat approximate due to the fact that the bluff top is not a well-defined edge, but rather a rounded zone of increasing steepness between the relatively level backyard and the sloped face of the upper bluff.

Additionally, ground cover along the top of the bluff may make precise measurement difficult. For our measurements, we used the Coastal Commission s definition of the bluff edge, defined as more or less continuously until it reaches the general gradient of the c At the time of this survey, the surface of the sloping upper bluff appears to be relatively stable, with no evidence of any recent upper-bluff erosion.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This assessment of the contiguous seawalls indicates that they are structurally sound and performing well at the present time. The surface textures and colors, although beginning to show "that point nearest the cliff beyond which the downward gradient of the land surface increases liff."
California Coastal Commission T1831.H01.001
249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 17, 2023
SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT Page 7
wear in some areas, are very similar to the adjacent seawalls and blend in well with the surrounding landforms.

Upper-Bluff Maintenance
Overall, the upper bluff appears to have weathered well over the past seventeen years. However, continuous surficial rilling in the area of the geogrid-reinforced slope below 255-265 Pacific Avenue appears to have occurred principally due to lack of protective vegetative cover.

A relatively isolated gully (an erosion channel that exceeds 1 foot in depth), has formed at the southerly limits of the geogrid-reinforced slope (see Photos 13 and 14). A potential solution to repair this gully and stabilize this area of the bluff is depicted in Figure 8. A geosynthetic such as a three-dimensional cellular confinement system (TDCCS) like Geoweb or TerraCell can be stacked in a stepwise fashion within the bottom of a gully to provide a series of low-height grade control elements that encourage infiltration and reduce channelized velocities within the natural drainage. The toe of each of these stacked structures should be protected with a mattress of a single layer of the TDCCS filled with soil and planted with suitable vegetation (see Figure 8).

Portions of the gully between grade control elements should be infilled and covered with a geotextile erosion control blanket to assist in vegetative development and the prevention of erosion until planting is well established. Additional vegetation sites are also located within the exposed step of the stacked TDCCS since soil is physically contained within the cells or elements of this particular type of geosynthetic as it is vertically constructed.

In addition, we recommend that a landscape plan be prepared and implemented to help protect and stabilize the fill slope. Subsequent monitoring surveys will serve to document any changes in what appears to otherwise be a very limited rate of upper-bluff erosion.

We trust this information meets your present needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please give us a call.

Sincerely,
ENGEO, INC. Walter F. Crampton, GE, D.CE Gregory A. Spaulding, CEG Principal Engineer Senior Geologist
wfc/gas/lt/jg
Attachments: Photographs
Figures
California Coastal Commission T1831.H01.001
249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach August 17, 2023
SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT Page 8
TerraCosta Consulting Group, Inc., August 5, 2014, Proposed Seawall Monitoring Program, 249 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, Project No. 2530-01 (CDP 6-13-0437).

TerraCosta Consulting Group, Inc., November 22, 2013, Seawall Monitoring Report, 249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, Project No. 1831H (CDP 6-99-100).

TerraCosta Consulting Group, Inc., June 3, 2005, Seawall Monitoring Report, 249-311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, Project No. 1831H (CDP 6-99-100).

TerraCosta Consulting Group, Inc., March 31, 2003, Seawall Baseline Monitoring Report, 249- 311 Pacific Avenue, Solana Beach, California, Project No. 1831-3 (CDP 6-99-100).

REFERENCES
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023

PHOTOGRAPHS
---------ENGEO - Expect Excellence -
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023

FIGURES
Figure 1 Monitoring Site Plan
Figures 2 through 4 Horizontal Profiles
Figures 5 through 7 Vertical Profiles
Figure 8 Gully Repair
---------ENGEO - Expect Excellence -
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 1: Seawall below 319 to 309 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023).

Photo 2: Seawall below 309 to 269 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023). (319)
311
309
309 301 269
Minor
Efflorescence
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 3: Seawall below 309 to 269 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023).

Photo 4: Seawall below 301 to 261 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023). 309 301 269
301 269 265 261
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 5: Seawall below 265 to 249 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023).

Photo 6: Seawall below 255 to 249 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023) 265 261 255 249
255 249
Minor
Efflorescence
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
309
Photo 7: Upper bluff below 311 to 309 Pacific Avenue (November 4, 2013).

Photo 8: Upper bluff below 311 to 309 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023). Signs of only minor erosion in nearly 10 years.
(319)
311
309
(319) 311
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 9: Upper bluff below 309 to 265 Pacific Avenue (November 4, 2013).

Photo 10: Upper bluff below 309 to 265 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023). Upper bluff performing well.
309 301 269 265
309 301 269 265
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 11: Upper bluff below 265 to 249 Pacific Avenue (November 4, 2013).

Photo 12: Upper bluff below 265 to 249 Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023). Geogrid-reinforced slope is showing continued rill erosion due in part to lack of vegetative cover. 265 261 255 249
265 261 255 249

LARGE EROSION GULLY
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 13: Geogrid-reinforced slope below 261 to 249 showing signs of deep erosion (April 26, 2023).

Photo 14: Screen shot of large and small erosion gullies below 255 Pacific Avenue provided by property owner drone footage (July 19, 2023).
261 255 249

LARGE EROSION GULLY

SMALL EROSION GULLY
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 15: Upper bluff below 255 to 249 (& 245) Pacific Avenue (November 4, 2013).

Photo 16: Upper bluff below 255 to 249 (& 245) Pacific Avenue (April 26, 2023). 255 249 (245)
255 249 (245)
T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 17: 249 Pacific Avenue looking south
(November 4, 2013).

Photo 18: 249 Pacific Avenue looking south
(May 19, 2022).

T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 19: 255 Pacific Avenue looking south
(November 4, 2013).

Photo 20: 255 Pacific Avenue looking south
(May 19, 2022).

T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 21: 261 Pacific Avenue looking north
(November 4, 2013).

Photo 22: 261 Pacific Avenue looking north
(May 19, 2022).

T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 23: Looking south toward 265 Pacific
Avenue upper bluff from 269 Pacific Avenue
(November 4, 2013).

Photo 24: Looking south toward 265 Pacific
Avenue upper bluff from 269 Pacific Avenue
(May 19, 2022).

T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 25: 269 Pacific Avenue looking north
(November 4, 2013).

Photo 26: 269 Pacific Avenue looking north
(May 19, 2022).

T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 27: 301 Pacific Avenue looking south
(November 4, 2013).

Photo 28: 301 Pacific Avenue looking
south (May 19, 2022).

T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 29: 309 Pacific Avenue looking north
(November 4, 2013).

Photo 30: 309 Pacific Avenue looking north
(May 19, 2022).

T1831.H01.001
August 17, 2023
Photo 31: 311 Pacific Avenue looking north
(November 4, 2013).

Photo 32: 311 Pacific Avenue looking north
(May 19, 2022).

MONITORING SITE PLAN T1831.H01.001 1" = 40' LT WC 1 249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 265 261 255 249 eer T s ae H yv PACIFIC AVENUE

23.5' 25.5' 21.5' 20.0' 20.6

25.9' 29.1

27.1 27.1

27.1 23.2' 22.7' 22.5' 20.6

24.0' 26.0' 25.2' 24.1'

10.5 11.2' 46

14.4'N/A**
(14.5') 311 309 301 269 PACIFIC AVENUE NO ROOF OVERHANG ROOF OVERHANG ROOF OVERHANG ROOF OVERHANG

7.7' 11.1' 5.8' 13.35' 14.3' 10.55' 13.9' 15.9' 11.2' 12.8' 13.4' 13.4' 9.8' 10.0'25.4' 26.8' 28.8' 28.0' 20.1' 16.4' 10.1' 11.7' 12.3' (18.3') 87 (8.05')
(12.0')
(8.8')
(11.0')
(14.5')
(29.3')
(20.5')
(11.6')
(12.0') N/A ** 1a9.7' 3a

7.95' EXISTING SEAWALL EXTENSION (CDP NO. 6-13-0437) EXISTING SEAWALL (CDP NO. 6-00-100 AND 6-05-095-A1) 45 44 43 41 42 40 39 38 37 36 34 33 32 31 3029 28 27 26 25 23 22 21 20 19 35 24 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 6 5 4 3 1 2 43A 45A * NEW PINS 50' 25' 50' 50' 50' 50' 50' 25' 25'

25.7' 25.5' (21.0')
N/A**
(13.1')
(9.1') . C 319 325 CLARK ST. PACIFIC AVENUE ROOF OVERHANG 25 APPROXIMATE FAILURE LIMITS, AUGUST 2003 7 8 9 10

14.4' 11.8' 11.3' 6.7' 50' 25' EXISTING SEAWALL (CDP NO. 6-00-100 AND 6-05-095-A1) EXISTING SEAWALL (CDP NO. 6-00-138) EXISTING SEAWALL (CDP NO. 6-00-36 AND 6-03-126) 2003 TOP OF BLUFF LINE 2005-2022 TOP OF BLUFF LINE 2005 TOP OF BLUFF LINE SCALE: 1"=40' 4 5/ 10 9 8 7 6 3 1 2 (10.9') NOTE: * NEW PINS ** SURVEY LOCATION NOT AVAILABLE DUE TO UPPER BLUFF IMPROVEMENTS Upper Bluff Survey Date: 5-19-22 Lower Bluff Survey Date: 04-26-23

14.4' DISTANCE TO BLUFF (2022 SURVEY) TOP OF BLUFF AS SURVEYED ON 05-19-22 (14.5') DISTANCE TO BLUFF FROM 2005 AND 2013 SURVEYS (ONLY SHOWN IF DIFFERENT FROM 2022 MEASUREMENTS) LEGENDWOOD FENCE MONITORING PIN 46 SEAWALL MONITORING PIN NUMBER MONITORING PIN DESTROYED ** TABLE OF ADDITIONAL MEASUREMENTS 1a YEAR LOCATION 2005 2013 3a 2005 2013 3a ADDITIONAL BLUFF TOP MEASUREMENT 10 SEAWALL MONITORING PIN 2022 TOP OF BLUFF LINE 2003 TOP OF BLUFF LINE 2013 & 2022 TOP OF BLUFF LINE 2005 TOP OF BLUFF LINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF LARGE EROSION HOLE MSE WALL APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF GEOGRID-REINFORCED BLUFF RECONSTRUCTION I
(
I
-------------- I
I
I
I
I
I
1\E~~===-------~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I -----------------7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -------1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ________ J_ ___________ ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I i I I
I
I -------------- 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ------------------i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ---------------- 1
I
I
I
I
I
I ------+---- 1
I
I
I
I
I
---- --------------------:

I
I
I
I i
I
I
I
I
I
I
+.-:~--,---------------------'
\
ii
!!l
i:l
0 i ii t;
i ~ I
I I
□□
8 s
I$
8 I
I
! 2
5 ,:::- I i:j
I ,__ ...
g
I C 10 _,
::,:

C
1 ti: C
:i:
el 0
§
f
I
i
311 PACIFIC(SOUTH)
t
20 40
i
•
I
•
8 I
i
!l 10
FEET
t
i
0 i
fi
fl.L PAnt lo:~\pROJECIS\.,..T~\Wortd119\Tie:!111LT19111t\T1e:!11H01001-T1ff1BOOOOO\lllonllortng\T1e:!111fOIOOLIF.il-o72UW9 SM: l».TE: 7/za/'l02J 1~14 AM

TORREY SANDSTONE
309PACIFIC
60 BO
PROFIL£ L£NGTH (FffT)

HORIZONTAL SECTION - PROFILE LENGTH
(301 SOUTH TO PIN 4) AT ELEVATION 7.5'± MSL
(301 NORTH I PIN 5 -311 SOUTH) AT ELEVATION 11.0'± MSL
(S£AWALL SURV£Y DAT£ 04-26-23)
E GEO
Exp«;tPIN #415 301PACIFIC 100 HORIZONTAL PROFILE 249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE SOI.ANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 120 PROJECT NO, T1831.H01.000 FIGUIIE NO. SCALE, ASSHOWN 2 DRAWN BY: LT CHECKED BY: WC OAICIMAL. nouAE PAINTED IN cotDR
8 s
I$
8 I
I
!
5 I
I
g
I
1 el
§
f
I
i
t
i
•
I
•
8 I
i
!l
t
i
0 i
fi
2 ;:::-
t:l
,__
t:l :::
0 10
.....
.'!
t:!
ct:
0 PIN#6 269 PACIFIC
20 10
FEET

TORREY SANDSTONE
· ....... .
-.': ·.:•• .!
2116 PACIFIC
40 60 BO
PROFIL£ L£NGTH (FffT)
HORIZONTAL SECTION - PROFILE LENGTH (261-269) SEAWALL AT ELEVATION 7.5':t MSL (5£AWALL SURV£Y DAT£ 04-26-23)
E GEO
Exp«;t261 PACIFIC (NORTH) 100 HORIZONTAL PROFILE 249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE SOI.ANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA fl.L PAnt lo:~\pROJECIS\.,..T~\Wortd119\TIIS::IIILT19111t\T11S::11H01001_T1ff1BOOOOO\lllonllortng\T11S::11lf01001Jl'3-072UW9 SM: l».TE: 7/za/'l02J 10:(15;!50 AM 120
PROJECT NO, T1831.H01.000 FIGUIIE NO.

SCALE, ASSHOWN 3
llOAWN BY, LT CHECKED BY: WC
OAICIMAL. nouAE PAINTED IN cotDR
I
:; ;
I
ffi
i:!
I
i
;
; I
i
t
!
• g
' •
I
!i
i
I
I
I
t
i
0 !
2 R
t:J
....
...

I::' :§ 10
__,
,:!'
281 PACIFIC (SOUTH)
20 10
FEET

TORREY SANDSTONE
266PAC/FIC 249PACIFIC
PIN#8
2023 PROFILE
40 60 80 100
PROFIL£ L£NGTH (FffT)
HORIZONTAL SECTION - PROFILE LENGTH SOUTH END SEAWALL AT ELEVATION 7.5':t MSL (S£AWALL SURV£Y DAT£ 04-26-23)

HORIZONTAL PROFILE
249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Fl.£ PATH: G:\Droftlng\PR0JECTS\....Twraeo.tG\w«Wno\T1&11LT19918\n&3u0100LT1t91900000\lilolllfflno\TllS)IH01001JP4-0723.dwg SN.£ C"'1E: 7,"le/2023 10:10:46 HA SMD S'I': LTuttlo

CONCRETE SEAWALL
PIN #10
120
PRO.IECT NO., T1831 .H01.000 nGURE HO.

SCALE, AS SHOWN 4
OOAWN BY, LT CHECKED BY: WC
OAIGIIW. nouAE PAINTED IN COi.OR
0 !i:
£!
~ 0
<.)
.-----------------------------------------------------------------.. ,, 0 4
FEET
ENGEO
-Expect Exoe/fenos18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
0 -1
-2
-3
12" THICK

SACRIFICIAL
SECTION - ---j....;,..-..,..._ _ _._.-+--+- 18" THICK STRUCTURAL SECTION

MEASUREMENT

LOCATION (TYP,)
MONITORING PIN#3

TRANSIENT
SAND BEACH \_
------ - .i:.=·=;~,~===.~.~
EL.-1.0± BEDROCK/
SHORE PLAlFORM
· .. ·=·.:: : •. 4 . <1· ·1 • I I
.,:··\ .. . { • ~ I 1 ·-.~···.·.·-.J\ . .::1 4 • <\-
1" DIA. DRAIN PIPE
'.'•; ; \ • l
c:; ·•:::J=· •.,_'ff---,'- EL. 7.()
~~~-. ff.: •. 4 : ·i EXISTING~" DIA.12" LONG
.. , ·•:.~----<· ,' PVC EROSION MARKER
<::~l ~--~-~;:::::1
:l • \ 14 t
·_::k 4 1 ? .~
<·~.·~ .. ·.··j 1 -~·.
..
·. ~ I EL.2.0
. ' 41 1 EXISTING½"DIA.12"LONG
••• J I PVC EROSION MARKER
,1 j
,._ I q-
:/J4A •• I ~ · I 1 J 41
··-~: ~--.: __ j
]
2'MIN.

EMBEDMENT
0 1 2 3 4

HORIZONTAL OFFSET (FEET)
VERTICAL PROFILE@ PIN #3
311 PACIFIC AVENUE (SOUTH)

VERTICAL PROFILE
249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
PROJECT NO.: T 1831. H01. 001
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DRAWN BY: LT CHECKED BY: WC
FIGURE NO.
5 ORIGINAL FlGURE PRINTED IN COLOR
i;;
0 I
18 17 16 15 14 13 12
11 10
9 i 8
7 t..; 6
,t
0 ;:::
5 4
3 2
0 -1 -2 -3
12"TI-ICK

SACRIFICIAL
SECTION --t-,~,----,,t-:,- HI' THICK
MEASUREMENT LOCATION ('TYP.)
MONITORING PIN /114

TRANSENT
SANOBEACH~
EL-1.0±BEDROCKI

SHOREPLA'TR)RM

STRUCTURAL SECTION
1"DIA DRAINPIPE
'-, ~ ~l;:NG(DIA 12"LONG
- ~ ::::-,'::- PVC EROSIONMARi<ER
. -1:::: :::::i
ti;:,:; =~=
<)-:.. i
1 0 1 2 3 4
HORIZONTAL OFFS£T (F££T)
VERTICAL PROFILE @ PINS #4 & #5
301 PACIFIC AVENUE
fl.L PAnt lo:~\pROJECIS\.,..T~\Wortd119\Tie:!111LT19111t\T1e:!11H01001-T1ff1BOOOOO\lllonllortng\T1e:!111fOIOOLW6....07U.dll9 5'.VE !WE: 7/H/'IJJZJ 10:~ MA 18 17
16 15 14 13 12
11 10
7 0
-1 -2 -3

MEASUREMENT
LOCATION ('TYP.)
MONITORING PIN 116
] '"'"· EMBEDMENT
0 1 2 3 4
HORIZONTAL OFFS£T (F££T)
VERTICAL PROFILE@ PIN #6
269 PACIFIC AVENUE
4 FEET E GEO
(SEAWALL SURVE:Y DAT£ O4-Z6-2.J) -E,q,et:t--
18 17
16 15 14 13 12
11 10
6 4
3 2
0 MEASUREMENT LOCATION ('TYP,)
12"THICK
SACRIFICIAL SECTION _....,. ____ ,__ 18" THICK STRUCTURAL SECTION MONITORING PIN #7
-17-., _____ _
-2 -3
0 1 2 3 4
HORIZONTAL OFFS£T (F££T)
VERTICAL PROFILE@ PIN #7
265 PACIFIC AVENUE

VERTICAL PROFILE
249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE
SOI.ANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
PROJECT NO, T1831.H01.001

SCALE, ASSHOWN
lll!AWN BY, LT CHECKED BY: WC
FIGUIIE NO.
6 OAICIMAL. nouAE PAINTED IN cotDR
0 I
18 17 16 15 14 13 12
11 10
9 i 8
7 t..; 6
,t
0 ;:::
5 4
3 2
0 -1
-2
-3
MEASUREMENT LOCATION (iYP.)
EL-1.0±BEDROCIQ

SHOFIE PLATFORM
- -t"C----r--rr- 18'THICK

STRUCTURAL SECTION
1" DIA. DR°"NP!PE
:;\'.:;-" EL 7.f1 !it~~~=
-:( :1 ·> I ~f~gti:~~NG
( :J .... {
1 0 1 2 3 4
HORIZONTAL OFFS£T (F££T)
VERTICAL PROFILE@ PIN #8
249 PACIFIC AVENUE
fl.L PAnt lo:~\pROJECIS\.,..T~\Wortd119\Tie:!111LT19111t\T1e:!11H01001-T1ff1BOOOOO\lllonllortng\T1e:!111fOIOOLW7J>72'.dll9 5'.VE !WE: 7/H/'IJJZJ 10:157:24 MA 18 17
16 15 14 13 12
11 10
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
0 -1 -2 -3

MEASUREMENT LOCATION (TYP,)
12" THICK
SACRIFICIAL SECTION - -j.-c'-!.,._'-,-...~-,' 18"TI-IICKSTRUCTURAL.SECTION MONITORING PIN 119
lRANSENT
~=H~
•
.•g.- EL 7f1 • r EXIST1NGfOIA.1Z'LONG
' '> ' PVC EROSION MMl(ER
: )
·.:
_
I '• l
• -l . I
tt4L,u, :•:,, :). • ., EXISTINGfDIA. 12'LONG
>~ -;~ ··, . PVC EROSION MARKER
{ j ] '"'"· EMBEDMe.lT
0 1 2 3 4
HORIZONTAL OFFS£T (F££T)
VERTICAL PROFILE@ PIN #9
249 PACIFIC AVENUE
4 FEET E GEO
(SEAWALL SURVE:Y DAT£ O4-Z6-2.J) -E,q,ect--
18 17
16 15 14 13 12
11 10
6 2
0 -1 -2
-3

MEASUREMENT LOCATION (TYP,)
MONITORINGPIN#10
EL. -1.0±BEDROCl<J

SHORE PLATFORM
0 1 2 3 4
HORIZONTAL OFFS£T (F££T)
VERTICAL PROFILE@ PIN #10
249 PACIFIC AVENUE

VERTICAL PROFILE
249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE
SOI.ANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
PROJECT NO, T1831.H01.001

SCALE, ASSHOWN
llOAWN BY, LT CHECKED BY: WC
FIGUIIE NO.
7 OAICIMAL. nouAE PAINTED IN cotDR
EL. 25.0'
T.O.W. EL. 35'
SANDS

PARTIALLY CEMENTED

FORMATION

BAY POINT

CLEAN SANDS
EL. 30'
1'x1' BENCH (TYP.)
5' (HORIZ.) ERODIBLE CONCRETE FILL
45°
75°
WALL
MSE
SLOPE

GEOGRID
WALL

TIED-BACK BAY POINT FORMATION

EXISTING
WALL
BLDG
3' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT

OF GEOGRID

EXISTING CONCRETE FILL

63.5°
60° ERODIBLE CONCRETE FILL
EL. 40'

TORREY SANDSTONE

GULLY REPAIR
249-311 PACIFIC AVENUE

SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
T1831.H01.001

NOT TO SCALE
8 SLOPE

TYPICAL PROFILE OF GULLY REPAIR WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL

CELLULAR CONFINEMENT SYSTEM (TDCCS) CONTROL STRUCTURE
A
A'
TDCCS

STACKED

GULLY BOTTOM

SOIL BACKFILL
TDCCS

STACKED

GULLY BOTTOM
ERODED

GULLY REPAIR

TYPICAL SECTION A-A'

BACKFILLED WITH SOIL

AND EROSION GULLY TO BE
NOTE: TDCCS TO BE CAPPED

GEOGRID

PRIMARY

GEOGRID

SECONDARY

GULLY SCARP

GEOGRID

PRIMARY

GEOGRID

SECONDARY

GEOGRID

PRIMARY

GEOGRID

SECONDARY
TDCCS

STACKED

TYPICAL GULLY REPAIR DETAIL

BACKFILL
SOIL
BOTTOM
GULLY
ERODED
BOTTOM
GULLY
ERODED

MATTRESS
TDCCS
VERTICALLY EXTENDING TO THE BACK OF THE GULLY.

D1557 WITH MIRAFI 2XT SECONDARY GEOGRIDS PLACED IN THE FILL AT 6" THE GULLY, BACKFILL THE GULLY WITH SOIL COMPACTED TO 90% OF ASTM NOTE: FOR THOSE SMALL GULLIES THAT HAVE INTACT GEOGRID EXPOSED IN COMPACTED SOIL.

GULLY WITH STACKED TDCCS MATS FILLED WITH

WITHOUT EXISTING INTACT GEOGRID, FILL ENTIRE
NOTE: FOR LARGER GULLIES AND SMALL GULLIES
COPYRIGHT O 2023 BY ENGEO INCORPORATED. THIS DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, NOR MAY IT BE QUOTED OR EXCERPTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF ENGEO INCORPORATED. 0 "' l> "" :z
CD
:-:'
r
-I
8 8
"'l CD
g
ill :aE
;:: 0
Vl ..,,
<, "' 2
,.,,
0 -a
:z
............. _~-
" ci
z
()
r L iY : _J I
:z :'i:-----"---------------------------------------...--,.----...--------- a 1l-ln11 :,1..s a:3/\VS Vfv' go:oz:ol £Z:Ol/ Ll/B :3.1va 3/\VS 61t1.PTl~?0- 8d~- lOOlOHl£8ll\6upo1tuor,i\ooooosl66ll .... --..---------,-----,..--..----.--- - lOOlOHl n? ll\81 66 11- H l £8 ll\6UJ)jJOM\DjSOJDJJaC\SlJ]rm:ld\6unJDJO\=~ .... --,---- =HlVd 37 1..:1 255,261 & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE BLUFF REVEGETATION PROJECT DATA SITE ADDRESS:
255, 261 & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075

GENERAL NOTES

1. APPROVAL OF THIS GRADING PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITLITE APPROVAL OF VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF A~ PRIVATE ROAD SHOWN HEREIN FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES.

2. FINAL APPROVAL OF THESE GRADING PLANS IS SUBJECTTO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENT PLANS WHERE APPLICABLE. FINAL CURB GRADE ELEVATIONS MAY REQUIRE CHANGES IN THESE PLANS.

3. IMPORT MATERIALS SHALL BE LEGALLY OBTAINED.

4. A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE CITY ENGINEER \MLL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY \\,ORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

5. ALL SLOPES OVER THREE FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL BE LANDSCAPED AND IRRIGATED.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING \\,ORK. NOTICE OF PROPOSED \\,ORK SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE FOLLO\MNG AGENCIES:

UNDERGROUND SERV1CE ALERT 811
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH PUBLIC 11,QRKS 858 720-2470

7. THE SOILS REPORT TITLED SEAWALL MONITORING REPORT, PREPARED BY ENGEO, INC., AND DATED AUGUST 17, 2023, SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS GRADING PLAN. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT.

8. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY ENGINEER DOES NOT AUTHORIZE A~ \\,ORK OR GRADING TO BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE PROPERTY OWNER'S

PERMISSION HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND A VALID GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

9. THE CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE BUILDING OFFICIAL'S APPROVAL OF A~ FOUNDATION FOR STRUCTURES TO BE PLACED ON THE AREA COVERED BY THESE PLANS. NO WAIVER OF THE GRADING

ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING MINIMUM COVER OVER EXPANSIVE SOILS IS MADE OR IMPLIED.

10. ALL OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISES, INCLUDING THE WARMING

UP, REPAIR, ARRIVAL, DEPARTURE OR RUNNING OF TRUCKS, EARTHMOVING

EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED GRADING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE PERIOD BETWEEN 7:00 A.M. AND 6:00 P.M.

EACH DAY, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY AND NO EARTHMOVING OR GRADING

OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISES ON SATIJRDAYS, SUNDAYS OR HOLIDAYS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

11. ALL MAJOR SLOPES SHALL BE ROUNDED INTO EXISTING TERRAIN TO PRODUCE

A CONTOURED TRANSITION FROM CUT OR FILL SUFACES TO NATURAL GROUND AND ABUTTING CUT OR FILL SURFACES.

12. NOTWITHSTANDING THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE EXCAVATION

AND GRADING CODE, AND NOTWITHSTANDING THE APPROVAL OF THESE GRADING

PLANS, THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. NO PERSON SHALL EXCAVATE ON LAND SO CLOSE TO

THE PROPERTY LINE AS TO ENDANGER ANY ADJOINING PUBLIC STREET,

SIDEWALK, ALLEY, FUNCTION OF ANY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, OR ANY OTHER

PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT SUPPORTING AND PROTECTING SUCH

PROPERTY FROM SETTLING, CRACKING, EROSION, SILTING SCOUR OR OTHER DAMAGE WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM THE GRADING DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAN.

THE CITY \MLL HOLD THE PERMITTEE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTION ON NON-DEDICATED IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH DAMAGE ADJACENT PROPERTY.

13. SLOPE RATIOS: CUT 1:1 FILL 1:1
CUT: 0 CY. FILL: 10 CY.

IMPORT/(EXPORT): 10 CY.

NOTE: A SEPARATE PERMIT MUST EXIST FOR OFFSITE IMPORT OR EXPORT AREAS.

14. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: IF ANY ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ARE DISCOVERED

ON THE SITE OF THIS GRADING DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, SUCH OPERATIONS WILL CEASE IMMEDIATELY AND THE PERMITTEE \MLL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE DISCOVERY. GRADING OPERATIONS \MLL NOT

COMMENCE UNTIL THE PERMITTEE HAS RECEIVED WRITTEN AUTHORITY FROM THE CITY ENGINEER TO DO SO.

15. ALL GRADING SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE COMPLETED AS A SINGULAR UNIT WITH NO PROV1SION FOR PARTIAL RELEASES. SHOULD IT BE ANTICIPATED

THAT A PORTION OF THIS PROJECT IS COMPLETED SEPARATELY, A SEPARATE PLAN AND PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL.

16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH AT (858) 720-2470, 24 HOURS BEFORE GRADING OPERATIONS BEGIN.

17. FINISHED GRADING AND PLANTING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED ON ALL SLOPES PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, OR IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF ANY SLOPES GRADED BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND APRIL 1. PRIOR TO ANY PLANTING, ALL

LANDSCAPING SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAGE, OR BY SEPARATE LANDSCAPING PLAN.

BENCH "'-'RK

GENERAL NOTES (CONTINUED)

18. ALL OFF-SITE HAUL ROUTES SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING \\,ORK.

19. UPON FINAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK UNDER THE GRADING PERMIT, BUT PRIOR TO

FINAL GRADING APPROVAL AND/OR FINAL RELEASE OF SECURITY, AN AS-GRADED CERTIFICATE SHALL BE PROV1DED STATING: "THE GRADING UNDER PERMIT NO. SBGRHAS BEEN PERFORMED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE \MTH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN OR AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED AS-GRADED PLAN." THIS STATEMENT SHALL BE FOLLOIM=D

BY THE DATE AND SIGNATURE OF THE CIVIL ENGINEER WHO CERTIFIES SUCH GRADING OPERATION.

20. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES

INCLUDING SHORING, AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, ST ATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

EROSION CONTROL NOTES

1. STORM WATER AND NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGE CONTROL: BEST MANAGEMENT

PRACTICES SHALL BE DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED TO MANAGE STORM WATER AND

NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING EXCAVATION AND GRADING ACTMTIES.

2. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL: EROSION PREVENTION SHALL BE EMPHASIZED AS THE

MOST IMPORTANT MEASURE FOR KEEPING SEDIMENT ON SITE DURING EXCAVATION AND GRADING ACTIVITIES. SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE USED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO EROSION PREVENTION FOR KEEPING SEDIMENT ON SITE.

3. EROSION CONTROL ON SLOPES SHALL BE MITIGATED BY INSTALLING LANDSCAPING AS PER

APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CONDITIONS, OR BY TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL CONFORMING TO THE FOLLO\MNG:

NON-IRRIGATED HYDROSEED MIX WITH A BONDED FIBER MATRIXAPPLIEDAH,000 LB/ACRE.

SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR DETAILS (SHEET 4).

4. THE TOPS OF ALL SLOPES TALLER THAN 5' SHALL BE DIKED OR TRENCHED TO PREVENT WATER FLO\MNG OVER CRESTS OF SLOPES.

5. CATCH BASINS, DESILTING BASINS AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

6. SAND BAG CHECK DAMS, SILT FENCES, FIBER ROLLS OR OTHER APPROVED BMP'S SHALL BE PLACED IN UNPAVED AREAS WITH GRADIENTS IN EXCESS OF 2%, AS WELL AS AT OR NEAR EVERY POINT WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOW LEAVE THE SITE.

7. SAND BAGS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF ALL DRAINAGE INLETS TO MINIMIZE SILT BUILDUP IN THE INLETS AND PIPES.

8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY ERODED SLOPES AS DIRECTED BY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP ROADWAYS AND ENTRANCES TO AND FROM THE SITE ON

A REGULAR BASIS TO KEEP THEM FREE OF SOIL ACCUMULATION AND AT ALL OTHER TIMES DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER SITE ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS TO MINIMIZE AIR BORNE

DUST CREATED FROM GRADING AND HAULING OPERATIONS OR EXCESSIVE WIND CONDITIONS, AND AT ALL TIMES DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 11, IN THE EVENT SILT DOES ENTER THE EXISTING PUBLIC STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, REMOVAL OF THE SILT FROM THE SYSTEM WILL BE AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE.

AS-BUILT:

UPON COMPLETION, AND PRIOR TO RELEASING THE SECURITlES, THE ENGINEER OF WORK SHALL "AS-BUILT" THE ORIGINAL MYLAR PLANS. INITIALLY, T\\,O COPIES OF RED-LINED PLANS SHO\MNG ALL AS-BUILT INFORMATION, INCLUDING ALL NEW UNDERGROUND FACILITIES (MAIN LINES, SERVICES AND LATERALS), IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.

WHEN THE RED-LINES ARE APPROVED, THE ORIGINAL MYLAR PLANS \MLL BE CHECKED OUT TO THE ENGINEER. THE ENGINEER SHALL MAKE THE CHANGES, SIGN EACH SHEET UNDER "AS-BUil T", AND RETURN ORIGINAL MYLARS TO THE CITY.

SCOPE OF WORK: THE PROJECT INCLUDES:
1, REPAIR OF EROSION GULLIES WITHIN THE EXISTING GRID REINFORCED SLOPE.

1. INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY IRRIGATION.

2. REVEGETATION OF THE SLOPE TO INCLUDE NATIVE PLANTING AND HYDROSEEDING.

SHEET INDEX
SHEET NO. _,D,,,E:,Sc,Ce.R,,,lf'_,Tl""O,,,N.,___ _____ _ TlTLE SHEET

SITE PLAN & CROSS SECTION
3 GULLY REPAIR
4 PLANTING PLAN, NOTES &DETAILS
5 PLANTING SPECIFICATlONS
6 IRRIGATION PLAN, NOTES & DETAILS
7 IRRIGATION PLAN, NOTES & DETAILS
IRRIGATION SPECIFICTIONS DESCRIPTICIN ST02-1/Z BRASSOtSKSO CO ENGR STAMPED"U1~ 19'5a ~ATSOLAAIABEACH ALONGHWY101 D5MILENOF1NTERSECTIONOF~101NO VIA LA VAu.E 5JFTE OF CENTERLINE OF HWY 101, 82 FTWOF AT ANOSFRRTRAO<S 2-4FEET N OF PROJECTEDCENTERLINEOFDAHUAOOIVE 8 FEETN OF PPJP12i!I081 ACOPPERR00135 FEET DEEP WITH ST ANOARD DISK STAMPED U 108 1955 T1~ R4N 0:2 fkS!'....ISJ7e ~MSL COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO. COP 6-99-100 SOL.ANA BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT ENGINEER OFWJRK CITY APPROVED CHANGES RECOMMENDED FOR.APPROVAL

OWNER/DEVELOPER CERTIFICATE
WE.ANTONIO ALAMO, BRADLEY STONE, DAVID SIVA GE , AS OWNERS OF THE

PROPERTIES DESCRIBED HEREIN ACKNOWLEDGE THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED AT OUR DIRECTION WITH OUR FULL CONSENT. WE FULLY UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDITlONS CONTAINED HEREIN AND AS ATTACHED BY REFERENCE ON THIS GRADING PLAN.

IT IS AGREED THAT FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE CHANGES TO THESE PLANS.

IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE OWNERS SHALL HAVE A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER MAKE

SUCH CHANGES, ALTERNATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THESE PLANS WHCH THE CITY ENGINEER

DETERMINES ARE NECESSARY AND DESIRABLE FOR THE PROPER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS.

WE FURTHER AGREE TO COMMENCE WORK ON ANY IMPROVEMENTS SHO\/\N ON THESE PLANS WITHIN EXISTING CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY \MTHIN 60 DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION

PERMIT AND TO PURSUE SUCH WORK ACTIVELY ON EVERY NORMAL WORKING DAY UNTIL

COMPLETED, IRRESPECTIVE AND INDEPENDENT OF ANY OTHER WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT OR UNDER OUR CONTROL.

SIGNED DATE

SIGNED DATE

SIGNED DATE

ENGINEER OF WORK CERTIFICATE
I, WALTER CRAMPTON H~~EBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF \\,ORK FOR THIS

PROJECT, THAT I HAVE EXERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE, AND THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS AND CITY OF SOLANA BEACH RESOLUTION NO. 98-101.

I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK OF PROJECT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY OF

SOLANA BEACH IS CONFINED TO A REVIEW ONLY AND DOES NOT REL EVE ME OF RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PROJECT DESIGN.

SIGNED _______________ _ DATE
R.C.E. NUMBER.~23~7~9'-'2~---------- EXP 12-31-25
ADDREss _ __,3~8~90=-=M~U~R~P~H_,_Y~C~A~N~Y~O~N~R~O~A~D=-•~S,,.,U,,.,I_,_T=-E~2~00~,~S~A~N~D~IE=-G=-O=, C~A=92~1~2~3_ TELEPHONE (858) 573-6900

ENGINEER OF WORK AS-BUILT CERTIFICATE

I, WALTER CRAMPTON HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE PREPARATION OF THESE AS-BUILT

DRAWINGS AND THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON ACTIJAL SITE INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN THE DATES OF __ AND __ , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE THE INFORMATION SHO\/\N ON THESE PLANS PROVIDE AN ACCURATE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE AS-BUILT CONDITIONS.

SIGNED _______________ _ DATE
R.C.E. NUMBER.~23_7~9~2~---------- EXP 12-31-25

SOIL ENGINEER CERTIFICATE

I, WALTER CRAMPTON A REGISTERED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, PRINCIPALLY DOING BUSINESS IN THE FIELD OF APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SAMPLING AND STUDY OF THE SOIL AND CONDITlONS PREVALENT IMTHIN THE SITE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION BETWEEN THE DATES FEBRUARY 2008 AND JULY 2015.1 HAVE REVIEWED THE PROJECT DESIGN AND GRADING SHOWN HEREIN IS

CONSISTENT WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE APPROVED SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS FOR THE PROJECT. ONE COMPLETE COPY OF THE FINAL SOILS REPORT COMPILED FROM THIS STIJDY, \MTH MY RECOMMENDATIONS, HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

SIGNED _______________ _ DATE ________ _
G.E NUMBER _2_4_5 ___________ _ EXP. __ 1~2_-3_1-_2_5 ___ _ ADDRESS 3890 MURPHY CANYON ROAD, SUITE 200, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 TELEPHONE (858) 573-6900 '

SOIL ENGINEER AS-BUILT CERTIFICATE
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE THE GRADING CONFORMS \MTH THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE SOILS REPORT AND PL.ANS \MTH THE EXCEPTION THAT Am CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLANS DUE TO UNFORESEEN FIELD CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL SOILS REPORT FOR THE PROJECT. ONE COMPLETE COPY OF THE FINAL SOILS REPORT COMPILED FROM THIS STIJDY, \MTH MY RECOMMENDATIONS, HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

SIGNED _______________ _ DATE ________ _
G.E NUMBER _2_4_5 ___________ _ EXP -~1~2--3~1~-2_5 ___ _

PROJECT

LOCATION
LEGAL OWNER:
(255 PACIFIC AVENUE)
ALAMO ANTONIO C & MARIA E FAMILY TRUST12-30-U
56 N PECOS RD #A, HENDERSON, NV 89074
(261 PACIFIC AVENUE)
SIVAGE FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 04-24-23
7425 E GAINEY RANCH RD #6, SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
(265 PACIFIC AVENUE)

BRADLEY H & SUSAN STONE
2885 SOFT HORIZON WAY, LAS VEGAS, NV 89135
A.P .N.: 263-312-09-00 (255), 263-312-01!-00 (261),
263-312-28-00 (265)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TR 1749 BLK23 LOTS 17,18,19
GROSS LOT AREA: 0.101 ACRES (255)

0.110 ACRES (261)
0,174 ACRES (265)
NET LOT AREA: 0.101 ACRES (255)

0.110 ACRES (261)

0.174 ACRES (265)
EXISTING USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE (ALL

PROPERTIES)
PROPOSED USE: NO CHANGE
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATlON & ZONING:

MRd-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 5-7 DU/ACRE;

OSR OPEN SPACE/RECREATION
OVERLAYS: SCALED RESIDENTIAL

OVERLAY
NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES: 2 PER LOT
BLDG AREA: 3,018 SQ, FT. (255)
3,023 SQ. FT. (261)
3,071 SQ. FT. (265)
!
WORK TO BE DONE: NOTTO SCALE
THE IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF THE FOLLO\MNG WORK TO

BE DONE ACCORDING TO THESE PLANS AND THE LATEST
EDITIONS OF:

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR

PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION

INCLUDING THE REGIONAL

SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDMENTS

STANDARD DRAWINGS

SAN DIEGO REGIONAL
ST AND ARD DRA\MNGS
E GEO
Expect Exr:sl/Gnal
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BENCH fMRK CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DRAWNG NO

GRADING PLANS TITLE SHEET FOR
By _________ By __________ -!Jn,-:-:-By- By-WALTER F. CRAMPTON Date 03/26124 ~====================:t===t==:1 By· _______ ,Date --By _Mo_ha_m_ma_d_Sa_mma_k_, c,y---Eng~_,-·-- >------------+--+---' By Date R C.E. 371-46 Exp CJ6.3'.).24 SEE DETAILED BLOCK ABOVE LEFT I 255, 261, & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE

BLUFF REVEGETATION
SBGRFireChief Date Dot, R.C.E.: 23792 Exp 12/31/25 SHEET 1 OF 8 ~
~- APPROXIM.UE-- -
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
~
I

BENCH MARK
~ST0:.11z· ~ss ~SK S D c o ENGR STMilPED'U 10! 19M'"
~ AT sot.ANA BEACH ALONGHWV 101 05 M1LENOFINTERSECTIONOFI-Wf101NO VIA LA VALLE 53FT E OFCENTERLNE OF HWY 101 112 FTWOF AT AHOSFRRTRACKS 24FEETN OF PROJECTEDCENTERI..IPEOFOAHUA DRIVE 6 FEETN OFPP.JP12t!Oe1 A COPPER R00135 FEET DEEP WITH ST,'H{JAROOISK STAMPEOU 1111111168 T1"'5R-'M'02 ELEV eJ 78 DATUM MS L

SOLANA BEACH FIRE DEPAATMENT SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT By---------By---------
Fire ctuef DIiie Q15tnct Engineer Dote
0 20
FEET
PacificA'6tJUB
261

EXISTING SEAWALL
(CDPN0-4i-00-100
ANl!)~5-0Q5-A1)
COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO. CDP 6-99-100
SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 "=1CT

ENGINEER OF W'JRK CITY APPROVED CHMIGES
_R_F_ By-WALTER F CRAMPTON Date 03126124
Drawn By
R.C.E. 23792 Bq:i 12/31/25
By.
f----------t---;--, By
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.

GEOGRID SLOPE
ERODED

GULLY BOTTOM
,----
SEE "TYPICAL GULLY
1 I REPAIR DETAIL" THIS SHEET - - ~
I
L
/
/

SECONDARY

GEOGRID
MSE
WALL

PARTIALLY

CEMENTED SANDS

63.5°

BAY POINT

FORMATION
1'x1' BENCH (TYP.)
3' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT

OFGEOGRID
BLDG
WALL
5' (HORIZ.) ERODIBLE CONCRETE FILL
EL. 30'

EXISTING

TIED-BACK WALL
CLEAN SANDS ;·,
EL.25.0'~~

TORREY SANDSTONE

EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN
APPROVED FOR CONSlRUCTION

NOTTO SCALE
ERODED

GULLY BOTTOM

PRIMARY

GEOGRID

SECONDARY

GEOGRID

SOIL BACKFILL
(SEE NOTE)
B
SH3 .. -:/::

ERODED GULLY ><~=~j·i·~:~-~~~~i~:==.-:.:-:::.:::.-:::.:-:::.-= ,L.

BOTTOM L.a~--~~-~~~~~-

TYPICAL GULLY REPAIR NOTTO SCALE
NOTE:

FOR THOSE SMALL GULLIES THAT HAVE INTACT GEOGRID

EXPOSED IN THE GULLY, BACKFILL THE GULLY WITH SOIL
COMPACTED TO 90% OF ASTM 01557 WITH MIRAFI 2XT
SECONDARY GEOGRIDS PLACED IN THE FILLAT6"
VERTICALLY EXTENDING TO THE BACK OF THE GULLY.

ENGEO
ExptlCt Exr:IIIIBnc.
3890 MURPHY CANYON ROAD
SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
(858) 573-6900
BENCHMt.RK CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DRAWNG NO GRADING SITE Pl.AA & CROSS SECTION FOR
Date __ By _______ Dote: __ _ I SEEDETAJLEDBLOCKABOVELEFT I 255, 261, & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE

BLUFF REVEGETATION
SBGR- Mohammad Samrnak, Cly Engneer
Date R C.E. 371-46 Exp 06-30-2◄ SHEET 2 OF 8
6" MAX. GEOGRID

VERTIFICAL SPACING
(SEE NOTE #3)

ORIGINAL
ERODED
GULLY

FINISHED

GROUND SURFACE
6'MIN.

OVEREXCAVATION

AND BENCHING
(SEE NOTES #1 & #2)

SURFICIAL EROSION GULLY REPAIR NOTTO SCALE
GULLY REPAIR NOTES:

1. OVEREXCAVATE EXISTING EROSION GULLY A MINIMUM OF
6 INCHES, OR UNTIL FIRM SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED.

2. BENCH GULLY EROSION IN 6-INCH STEPS TO ACCOMMODATE
PROGRESSIVE GEOGRID LAYERING.

3. BACKFILL GULLY \MTH COMPACTED FILL SOILS. FILL
MATERIALS SHALL BE AS INDICATED IN "REINFORCED
EARTH FILL MATERIALS" NOTES ON THIS SHEET.

4. DURING BACKFILL OPERATIONS, INSTALL GEOGRIDS AT A
MAXIMUM 6" VERTICAL SPACING. SEE "CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE FOR SLOPE REPAIR" NOTES ON THIS SHEET.

BENCH MARK
DESCRIPTION STD 2·1/:>" BRASS DtSl< SO CO ENGR STAMPEO ·u 10, 1915!r

SITE SAFETY

THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED THAT THE UPPER BLUFFS, THE CLEAN SANDS ABOVE ELEVATION 25 FEET, ARE HIGHLY UNSTABLE AND
SUBJECT TO PROGRESSIVE FAILURES, \MTH THE POTENTIAL FOR

TENS TO HUNDREDS OF YARDS OF BLUFF-TOP MATERIALS TO
COLLAPSE \MTH LITTLE, IF ANY, WARNING. PAST FAILURES HAVE

BEEN TRIGGERED BY THE VIBRATION INDUCED FROM LOW-FLYING

HELICOPTERS TRANSITING THE COASTLINE, AND CORMORANTS

PERCHING ON THE SMALL SHELF THAT IS NOW DEVELOPING AT THE

GEOLOGIC CONT ACT WITH THE UNDERLYING CLIFF-FORMING
TORREY SANDSTONE. SUFFICE TO SAY A HAZARDOUS CONDITION

EXISTS FOR CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WORKING AT THE BASE OF
THE SEA CLIFF. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR

IMPLEMENTING WHATEVER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS HE DEEMS
NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE THIS HAZARD.

REINFORCED EARTH FILL MATERIALS

1. EXCEPT AS OTHER\MSE INDICATED BELOW, UNCLASSIFIED FILL

SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SSPWC SECTION
300-4.

2. CLODS OR HARD LUMPS OF EARTH SHALL BE BROKEN UP
BEFORE COMPACTING THE MATERIAL IN THE FILL.

3. MATERIALS FOR COMPACTED FILL SHALL CONSIST OF ANY

ONSITE OR IMPORTED MATERIAL THAT, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, IS SUITABLE FOR USE IN CONSTRUCTING FILLS. THE

MATERIAL SHALL CONTAIN NO ROCKS OR HARD LUMPS
GREATER THAN 6 INCHES IN SIZE AND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST 40% OF MATERIAL SMALLER THAN 1/4 INCH IN SIZE. ROOTS,

TREE BRANCHES AND OTHER MATTER MISSED DURING

CLEARING, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE FILL AS DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.

4. SILT PLUS CLAY CONTENT OF THE UNCLASSIFIED FILL IS NOT TO EXCEED 40% BY WEIGHT. CLAY CONTENT SHALL NOT BE LESS
THAN 10% BY WEIGHT, AND NO MORE THAN 5% SHALL BE
RETAINED ON THE 2.0 MM SIEVE.

5. THE SOIL SHALL HAVE A COHESION OF 100 PSF MINIMUM ANDA MINIMUM PHI OF 33 DEGREES.

6. THE PLASTICITY INDEX (P.I.), AS DETERMINED BY THE ASTM D-4318, SHALL NOT EXCEED 25.

7. ALL FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM RELATIVE
COMPACTION OF 90%.

FILL NOT CONFORMING TO THESE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT BE USED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER.

THE FREQUENCY OF SAMPLING OF UNCLASSIFIED FILL, NECESSARY

TO ASSURE GRADATION CONTROL AND ALL SUPPLEMENTAL

REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED ABOVE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,
SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR SLOPE REPAIR

1. PLACE GEOGRIDS (2XT) FLAT ON LEVEL GROUND AND EXTEND TO THE FULL AVAILABLE EMBEDMENT LENGTH. THE FRONT

ENDS OF THE GEOGRIDS SHOULD EXTEND BEYOND FINISHED
SLOPE LINE, AND THEN TRIMMED TO MATCH SLOPE.

2. PLACE BACKFILL ON TOP OF GEOGRIDS AND COMPACT TO A
MINIMUM OF 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION UNTIL COMPACTED
LIFT EQUALS THAT SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRA\MNGS.

3. PLACE NEXT LAYER Of GEOGRIDS FLAT ON LEVEL GROUND
AND EXTEND TO THE FULL AVAILABLE LENGTH. THE FRONT

ENDS OF THE GEOGRIDS SHOULD EXTEND BEYOND FINISHED
SLOPE LINE, AND THEN TRIMMED TO MATCH SLOPE.

4. FILL MATERIAL ALONG THE FRONT FACE OF THE SLOPE SHOULD

BE COMPACTED AND GRADED TO MATCH THE SURROUNDING
BLUFF SURFACE.

5. REPEAT STEPS 2 THROUGH 5 UNTIL GULLY IS COMPLETELY
FILLED. LOCATION AT SOlNiA. BEACH ALONG HWY 101 0 5 MILE N OF INTERSECTION OF 1-fN'( 101 NO VIA. LA VALLE 53 FT E OF CENTERLINE OF HWY 101 B2FTWOF AT ANOSFRRTRAQ(S FEET N OF PRo.ECTED CENTERLlfE OF ON-!UA DRl'IE ll!i FEET N OF PP JP12!10ll1 A.COPPER ROD 135 FEET DEEPWITHSTN-IOAROOISK STAMPEDW 1081NII T1.SR4N02
.E.!£Y....0711 0,'TtJM MSL COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO. CDP 6-99-100 SOLANA BEACH FIRE OEPAATMENT SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT ENGINEER OF 'NJRK CITY APPROVED Ct-WIGES H'f"Dlllffl! RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION By _________ By _________ -Dn, -:-:-.y- By-WALTER F CRAMPTON Date 03126124 Fire ctuef DIiie D1stnct Engmeer Date
By. _______ DIie __ By _______ .Dole
Mohammad Sammak, Ciy ~aer
R C.E..23792 Exp 12/31125 By Date R C.E 371"'6 Exp 06-3>2'4

PROCESS OF RECONSTRUCTION

1. ACCESS AND SITE PREPARATION
a. ACCESS TO THE CONSTRUCTION AREA WILL BE FACILITATED THROUGH THE HOMEOWNERS' YARDS AT THE TOP OF THE BLUFF.
b. FILL SOILS WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE BACKYARD FOR
TRANSPORTATION TO THE GULLY AREA.
c. INSTALLATION OF A 12" DIAMETER PVC PIPE CHUTE (CUT IN HALF) FOR SOIL TRANSPORT FROM THE TOP OF THE BLUFF TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. d. LADDERS WILL BE PLACED ALONG THE SLOPE FACE TO FACILITATE SAFE MOVEMENT ON, AND MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO THE FACE OF THE BLUFF. e. CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING MATERIALS WILL BE HAND CARRIED TO AND FROM THE SLOPE.

2. EXCAVATION AND STABILIZATION
a. THE RECONSTRUCTION WILL COMMENCE WITH THE EXCAVATION FOR THE LOWEST SECTION OF THE GULLY.
b. VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL KEYWAYS WILL BE CREATED TO ENHANCE STABILITY.
c. GEOGRID WILL BE STRATEGICALLY PLACED ON THE EXCAVATED SECTION EXTENDING TO THE BACK OF THE BENCHING. ,
d. EXCAVATED SOIL WILL BE UTILIZED TO FILL THE SECTION ATOP MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH (MSE).
e. ANY ADDITIONAL DIRT REQUIRED WI LL BE TRANSPORTED VIA THE PVC CHUTE.
f. SIMILAR EXCAVATION AND STABILIZATION PROCEDURES \MLL BE CONDUCTED IN SECTIONS MOVING UP THE SLOPE.
g. THE PROCESS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL REACHING THE TOP OF THE ERODED SLOPE.
h. ANY SURPLUS SOIL WILL BE MANAGED BY A TEAM MEMBER, WHO WILL MOBILIZE TO CLEAR A SPACE ON THE BEACH FOR DISPOSAL.

3. TEMPORARY IRRIGATION INSTALLATION

4. PERFORM WEED CONTROL
a. IRRIGATE FOR A PERIOD OF TWO WEEKS OR UNTIL WEED HEIGHT EXCEEDS 2 TO 3 INCHES.
b. APPLY ROUND UP.
c. REMOVE ALL WEEDS.

5. HYDROSEED APPLICATION
a. SPRAY APPLY HYDROSEED SLURRY.
b. PERFORM GERMINATION STAGE IRRIGATION.

6. PLANTING
a. EXCAVATE PITS TO RECEIVE PLANTS.
b. PLACE PLANTS INTO PREPARED PITS AND BACKFILL.
c. APPLY INITIAL IRRIGATION AND FERTILIZER MIX.
d. SMOOTH PLANTING AREAS

7. RESTORATION AND CLEANUP
a. REMOVE EXCESS DEBRIS AND SPOILS.
b. SMOOTH PLANTING AREAS.

ENGEO
BENCHM'.RK
I SEEOETAILEDBLOCKABO\IELEFT I
Expoct Exosl/Dncs
3890 MURPHY CANYON ROAD
SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
(858) 573~900

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

GRADING GULLY REPAIR DETAIL & NOTES FOR
255, 261, & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE

BLUFF REVEGETATION

DRAWNGNO
SBGRSHEET 3 Of 8

PACIFIC A V E N U E

EXISTING RESIDENCE
265 PACIFIC AVENUE

BENCHMARK
~STDM/2"BAASSOISKS.O.CO.EWlflSTAM?EO"U10!1SU• :

LOCA'llOtl ATSOlA,~SEACH,AlONG~101.0.5MtLENOFINTERSECTIONOi"~101.AND , :-,~~~~~~UcNer~~ci!!\roo~,1s°te~FJ~~~i=af~~~~~~~N I ~o:;;;M:~:.OfSXSTAMPEOU10a1ffl.THSR-4WO:! I

EXISTING RESIDENCE
261 PACIFIC AVENUE
APPROXIMATE uwrs Of'------
2003 GEOGND REM'ORCEO
BLUFF CONSTlUJtn:lff

EXISTING RESIDENCE
255 PACIFIC AVENUE
PLANTING PLAN SCALEl'"lil'-0"
COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO. CDP 6-99-100

HYDROSEED MIX

SCIENTIAC OR PRODUCT NAME
BINDER

FERTILIZER
MULCH
ABRONIA VIU.OSA
AMBRostA CHAMlSSONIS
ARTEMISIA CALIFORNlA
CMUSSON" CHEIRAHTHIFOUA. SSP. Sl/FFRUllCOSA

CLEOME ISOMERIS
CO!I.EOPSISw.RJTU;tA
CORElHROG"fflE FILN(GtlfOW.SSP. LtilFOI..IA

ENCELIA CALIFORNIA

ERIOGONUM FASCICULATUM

LASTHENIA CALIFORNIA
- LASTHENIA GLABRA
LUPfNUS B!COt.OR

MIMULUS PUNICEUS
SARVO!I~
SUPERlHRrlE.,.

COMMON NAME
AZTEC'" OR APPROVED EQUAL
TRI-C6-2-4

VIRGIN WOOD ABER

SANO VERBENA

BEACH BUR

COASTAL SAGEBRUSH
SUH CUP (!EACH MNtmPRlMOSE)
Bt>.OOERPOO
SAU DIEGO SfA DAHLIA
DEL WAR MES>.SANOASTER
CAUFORNtA ENCELIA

CALIFORNIA BUCKWHEAT

DWARF GOLDAELOS

GOLOFIELDS

PYGMY-LEAFED LUPINE
MONKEYFLOVt'ER
P.LS.
"' '"'

0.30% "'
TT%
" "'
RATE/ACRE SEE1lSILB.
225L8S.
500LBS.

JOOOLBS.
1 LBS, 15,000
,0,000
3LBS, 55,000,000
112LBS 4,000
5LBS 4,000
2LBS
1/2LBS 940,000
8LB. 175,000
10LBS. 450,000
1w1/2LBS. 3,250,000
1-1/2LBS. 1,800,000
5 LBS. 115,000
1-1/2 LBS. 1,200,000
ADO GYPSUM OR FLOWABLE GYPSUM TO THE MIX. AND CONFIRM BEFORE APPLICATION MYCORRHIZAL lNOCULUM, OlOMIS lNTRARAotCES
6GALS,
20ZJ100 GALS OF HYOROSEED SI.URRY
tSOOLBS.
<OOZ.

HYDROSEED NOTES:

I, %P.L.S.=%PURITYTIMES %0£RUW.TION OF SEED. ruts NOICATESlliE MNIWM PERCENTAGE. OF l'VRITY OF THE SEED TO BE PROVIOEO. 2, THE SEED COVPANYSHAltAPPLYAUSEEDYi1Tli~ ONEYEAA Of Cot.LECTIOO.

3. HYOROSEEDNGWILL BE MOST EASI!. YESTA8ll.')iED, If APPLIED BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 ANO JNNA.~Y 16,
-4 . .A.DOITIONAL RATES Of UlJLCH NiO UiOER HAVE SEEN SPECIAEO TO SE ADEQUATE FOR. lliE STEEl'HESS Of SLOPE.

5. CONTRACTOR lSAOVJSEO THAT THE ACTUAL AREA(ON SLOPE) FOR lHIS PROJECT IS APPROXUIATELY 1-41% 1.ARGER THA."11liEAAEA SHOtffi N iliE PLAN vtEW. SEED. MULCH A."10 SNOER NtO FERTIUZER AMOUNTS SHALL BE COMMENSURATE wmt THIS ACTUAL SLOPE AREA,
(NOT THE PI.Af.lUETiUC AREA.)
HYDRQSEEDiNG SPECIFICATIONS 1. SUPERVISION: All HVDROSEEDIOO IS SUBJECT TO AP l'ROVAI.. BY THE l.AtiDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR HIS REPRESENTATf/E, ANDlHEYSHALL, If NECESSARY, BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED AS PA.'{T OfTHE COITTRACT, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR HIS REPRES!NTATM SHALL SUPERVISE THE HYOROSEEDWG,

2. HYDROSEEO APPUCATIOO:ASLURRY OF FERTIUZER, SEED, ANOWOOO PULP OR FISER SHALL BE AGITATED TO PROVlOEAUNIFORM MOC. lHEOPERATOR SHALL SPRAYTHE AREA v.tni A COMPLETE lJNIFORU\1SISLE COATUSflGTHE COLOR Of THE CELLULOSE FBER ASA VlSVAL GUIDE. il-lE SLURRY &iAll BE APPLIED ti A DC1M.WARO DRllLNG MOTION (EXCEPT ON SLOPES WELL ABOVElHE OPERATOR) VIA.AFAN STREAM NOZZLE. THE MATERV.LS SHOULD !IE UNlfORMLYtMPREGNATEO Vl1lli SEED .AHO SHALL AUOWPENETRAT)OS Of IWNF"1.L .AHO PERCOLA.1100 Of MotSTURE ffi'OTHE IJNDERLYWGSOO..

THE HYDROWLCHISG SWRRY COMPOOEHTS SHA!L NOT BE LEFT IN il-lE HYDROWLCH MACHf4E FOR MORE THJHTWO HOURS. If SllJRRY COMPONENTS AAE LEFT FOR YORETHA.N lWOHOURS N THE MACHINE. THE COOTRACTOR SHALL ADO~ MORE Of'fl-lE ORIGtiAUY SPECIFIEO SEED MIXTOA."IY SLURRY MlX ~!CH HAS NOT !EEN APPUED WffiilN 11-IE TWO HOO RS AFTER M!XmG. THE cc:,jTRACTOR S!W.LADD 75'£ IIORE Of THE 0Rk;l\1Al SEED Mtx. TO.ANY SLURRY Mt'(J\!RE~ICH HAS NOT BEEN APPLIED EIGHTH OURS AfTER MIXNG. NtY Mt'(TURE ~!CH HM NOT BEEN APPLIED WfiHN 8 HOURS Of MIXING SHALL 8E REJECTED .AND otSPOSED OF OFF-SITE AT CONTRACTOR'S EXP EU BE. l.SPECW.. CARE ts TO RE EXERCISED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO PREVENTlliE SWRRYFRot.t B~G SPRAYED OOTON<¥ AOJACENTPI.AITTERS, PROPERTY, OR ONTO WALKS OR WALLS.MN SLURRY SPRAYED ONTO THESE AAEAS SHOULD BE CLEANED Off BY THE CONTRACTOR.

4. GERMtlATlOO STAGE IRRIGATION WTTHP-112 llOllRS AFTER HYDROWLCHtm 11-IE PWffNOAREAS, THE WATERNG SEQUENCE SHOULD BE NmATEO, THE WATER SHOULD BE LEFT 00 LONG ENOUOOTO MOISTEN lHE SOf!. THOROOGl-tl YTO THE OEPTH OflliE StURRY MULCH, TAKING CARE NOTTO SUPER SATURATE OR WASH AWAY1liE SLURRY mo SEED. THE CONTRACTOR mu REPAlR ALL SEEO W.A.SHNG OR EROSJOO.A LIGHT, FREQUENT 111:R~Ml SEOIJENCE SHOULD CONTJIIJE UNTl.

THE SEEOlNGS HAVE GR~ BEYOND THE GERM'1ATION STAGE. 1HE GERWHATIOH STAG£Vt1!.L RANGE FROM S TO 60 DAYS.

5. PREPI.AATNG FERTlll?ER MAY BE APPUEOWfTH THE HYOROSEEO. FERTILIZER SHALL BE AH ORGA.~IC, PElLETEO OR CHI? TYPE, UNIFORM IN COMPOsm::::m, FREE-FlO\'ffiG, SUITABLE FOO. A!'PlfCATION WITH APPRMO EOUl?MENT, NlD DElNEREO TOlHE SITE N UNOPENED, OR>3NA1. COOTJJNERS, EACH BEARtiG lliE MANUFACTIJRER'S STATEMENT Of OOA,l{,t,.'tTEED AW.!. YSts. FERTlUZERS SH"1.L BE AT RATES RECOMMENOEO BY AGRICULTURAi. surrABILITV sou. TESTING RE-SUL TS OR THE tNlOSCAPEAACHTrECT.
6, GIJAAA'fTEE:ALL HYDROSEEOtiG SHALL BE GUARANTEED BYlliE CONTRACTOR AS TO GRONIHAi;D HEAi.TH FOR A PERK>O Of THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FtiAL ACCEPTANCE BYlHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. AREAS THAT FAil TO GROW SHAtL BE RESEEDED UPON OIRECTIOO OfTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE COOTRACTOR IS SIJSJECTTOA SOCTY {SO) DAYMAINTENA.m:E PER JOO OF lHE RESEEOEDAREAS.
, AS A FRST ITEM OF WORK CONTRACTOR SH"1.L PROVIOETHE I.AMOS CAPE , ARCHfTECTWITH A COMPOSITE SOil SAMPLE, COlLECTED AT THE D!RECTIOO Of IBE LANDSCAPE ARCHrrECT. Of ROUGHLY EOUAI..WOONTS,FROM A Mt.lMUW Of' tOCAnoos ON THE PROJECT SITE.SOil SAU?LEWILL BE PROCESSED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.ACTUAL SOI!. AMENDMENTS WILL BE l!ASEO ON THE RESULTS OF THE lAB TEST Of THIS SAMPLE. THE AMENDMENT SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEU CON:STRlJEO SO AS TO COVER WOST cc+.'ffiGENCIES FOR AMENDMENT, THERESY ELIMtlATING lllE POSSIWJTY OF A CHAM GE ti COST.

PLANTING NOTES
\. All VEGETATION PL.ANTED ON THE SITE SHAI..L COOstsT OF NATM, DROUGHT TOLERANT SPEClfS, NON tNASIVE Pl.ANTS . .A!.LHYDROSEEONG 00 THE APPROX.. 1:1 SLOPE CONSISTS Of SPECIES NATIVE TOlliE SAN OIEOO coomv COASTAL

BLUFFS,

2. ALL PLANffiG SHALL BE COMPlETEOWITHN 60 DAYS Of THE COHSTRIJCTION OF THE BlUFF.

3. All REOU~ED PlANTllGS Will BE MAM'JJNEO N GOOD GRC1i'ffiG cooomoo THROUGHOUTil-lELFEOFTHE PROJECT,NW,WHENEVERNECESSAAY,SHALL BE REPLACED Wl'rn NEW EQIJNALENT PlANTWATERW.STO ENSURE COHTllUED COMPLWiCEWffii lANDSCAPE PLANS.

4. SINCETHE HVDROSEED Mt( IS NATNE. ~RK3ATION SHALL BE APPLIED ONLY AS »ECESSARYTO PROMOTElllE GERM.NATION A»D EARLY GROWTli Of 11-IE PLA~TtmS,ANO THEREAFTER FOR UP TO ZG MONTHS AFTER SEED NG, ONl 'f AS REQUIRED TO M.A!NT.W THE Pl.ll-lffiGS N AHEAlTHYCONOlllON.

S.1.ANDSC.4.PECOOTRACTOR SHALL RECErlETHE SITE AS IS.
t. THE P!MffiGPI.ANS ARE DWlRAl,OMTI:. MNOR ADIIJSTME»TS N Pl.ANT lOCATIOOS .-.~o TYPE MAY BE MADE AT THE OfSCREllON OflHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.

7. All Pt..NIT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO il-lEAPPRO'IAL Of lHE IMOSC.4.PE ARCHfTECT NlO REPLACEDUPOO REQUEST BEFORE 00 AFTER THE PLNffi'4G.

8.1.ANDSCAPEARCHrrECT SHAU APPROVE FNAL PLACEMENT Of AU SHRUIIS PRIOR TOPlANTING,

9.1 GAL SHRUB PITSSHAlLIIE1WOTIMES ROOTBALLIXAMETER WIOENlD M/2 TIMESCONTANER DEPTH.

10. OONOTOAMAGE PlNITROOTRALl OURNGTRAHSPORTATlON OR PIJJITNG.

11. NITT!OllZEO ORGANIC AMENDMENT SHALL BE WJLBUMLUSWll-GR.0"' SOI!.

IJAENOMENT, LOA.MEX.,,.,, OR APPROVED EOIJAL

12. A..PLANTNGBACKFILLMOCFORAUCONT.WER PI..NtTS SHAU CONstSTOF iJ NITROUZEO ORGANIC IJAENOMEHT AAD-4,'5 EXISTNG SOIL. PLUS 2 ll!S. PER cu. YO.Of SOILSlJLFUR, 112 Las.OF moo SULFATE.-41.5S.OFTRJ.COR&.NIC FUTUJZER £.2-4 PER CIJIIIC YARD. N ADomON APPLYQ LBS. OFTRJ.C MYCO DRENCH FOR iliETOTAl Of BACKFILL OR PER MFGR'S SPECIFICATIONS.

B. ALL PLANTED AREAS SHALL BE WATERED N THOR.OOGiiL YWffil SARVON"', PER MmtJFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS IN AOVNICE Of Pwm«:.. All Pl.ANTS SttAl.l SE WATERED THOROUGHl YWITH SUPERlHRflE"' WITHN 2 HOO RS Of PI..ANTNG. 1l. ALL Pl.A.HTS 1-Go\l.LON SIZE OR LARGER SHALL REC ENE AGRIFORM 21-GAAM

20.10-6 FERTILIZER TABlETSATlHE FOLLOWNGRATES:
1-GAI..LON:ONE.;TWO PER S-GALLON;PlACE TABLETS AT HALF THE DEPTH OF THE PLAHrnGFrr mo l"fROM ROOTBAl.l.

14. ALL PlANTS Pl.ANTED FROM CONTANERS SHALL HAVE THEIR ROOTMlLS SCORED Wffi1 A SHARP TOOL TO A DEPTH OF I' N THREE LONGITUDflAL tiCISIONS AT LOCATIONS SPACED AAOUNO THE ROOTWL BEFOfl.E PLACNG PLAHT I' PLAHffiOHOLE.

15. AU SHRUB BASNS(ONL'f)SHALL 8ECMREDV.1THA 1'DEEP LA.YER OFAHIGH QUALITY MULCH (RAGGED PROOUCT).ALL BARK TO BENtrROUZEOWITH S'4 NITROGEN.

16. A LANDSCAPE MAM'ENA.~CE PERIOD OF I YEAR SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THIS COOTRACT.PLEASE BIO AS A SEPARATE ITEi,!.

NOTES
-1liE NATM NOIHRRIGATED HYDROSEED 1,11.'(SfW.L BE APPLIED TO THE SLOPE BElWEEN OCTOBER 15 ANO JANUARY 15 TO PROVOiE NATURAL
GfRWW.TlOt-i NtD EARLY GROWTH OF THE PlNfTNGS \\TTHNTHE MOUTHS MTH MORE PRECWTATIOO.
- PRIOR TO 1.ANOSCAPE COOSTRUCTtoN, CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ON--SITE V4TH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO REVIEWTHE SITE CONOfTIONS,AS GRADED SOl.S,SUCCESS CRITERIA MD OTHER REOUIREMEHTS Of THE PROJECT.

STIW'/WAffiE COCOOUT RIIER NETTll ,
NSTALL 1flFT Af>AAT.SECUREWITH !'X t•
WOODEN STAKES,-4FT. APPAAT MAX.

NOTES:
-PREPARE SMOOTH SLOPE BEFORE NSTAUATK:lti
-OOSW.U. TREHCHACROSSTHESLOPEOH CONTOUR. TOPI..A.CEROlLSft THE TRENCH SHOIJ!.D Bf DEEP ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A TI-IRD TOAIW.F THE THICrnESSOFTHEROlL
•tr IS Cf\lTICAL TiiAT ROLLS ARE NSTAI..LEO PA.WI.EL TOSI.OPE COOTOIJR. -NSTALLSTAKESAT 4FTMAXMERVN.S. I.EAVE 1 OR 2 t«::HES OF STM£ EXPOSED ~ROlL
-CONSTRUCT AN COMPACTED EA.II.TH~ BERM ALONG THEIJPHllSIDE OF THE ROlL TO FORCE SHEET FLOWNTO THE ROl1#4D PREVENTWS.TER FROM Pff.lG~TO THE TRENCH.

ALT.ITEMS:

CCfflRACTOR TO PROVIOEABIO ALTERNATE FOR ONE OF il-lE FOLlOWHG COOTRACTOR MAY CHOOSE WHICHEVER Of THE T\','O lS MORE ECONOJ.UCAL OR EASY TONSTALL.
:l:~7;%~~aJJ~:~~~
THE l!.ACKALL. THIS IS lHE LANDSCAPE AACHITECT'SPREFERREOCHotCE.

OR
BJG€LPM OF DfllWATER•ATEACH Pl.ANT. LOCATE ON O~HIU SIDE OF PL.,l;N"ffiG PIT A."10 AWAY FROM DRl? EMITTER.

NATIVE CONTAINER PLANT$ ABBR. SIZE
ART. CAL i GAL.

ATR.BRE. 1GAL.

CAM. C,S. 1 GAL.

CLE. ISO. 1 GAL
coo.WAR. 100.

ENC.CAI.. 100,
ERl.0.P. 1GAL.
(AlT,)ERl.11.D. !GAL.

RHU.NT. !GAL.

QTY. SCIENTIFIC NAME
31 ARTEWSIA.CAUFORNICA
-40 ATRl?t.EX L 'flREWERr
JS CAMISSOOIOPSIS CHEIRANTHIFot.lA
35 CLEOMEISOMERIS
-42 COREO?SIS MARITIUA
71 EN CELIA CALIFORNICA
31 ERIOGONUM'OANAPONT'
ERIOGOOlJM FASCICIJlAnJM 'BRUCE DtCKNSON'
25 ~us tiTEGRFOLIA

COMMON NAME
CALIFORNIA SAGc"BRUSH

BREWERSALTBUSH

BEACH PRIMROSE
BlAOOERPOD
SEA.DAHLIA
CALfORNVI. ENCEllA
OANAPOfITTBlJCK'MiEAT
BRlJCE DICKINSON SUCK'MiEAT
l.EltONADE BERRY
SOLANA BEACH ARE DEPARTMENT j
I
I I I
SANTA FE IRRIGATION [)STRlCT !.ANOS-CAPE ARCHITECT OF \.VORK aTY .APPROVED CHAf'.K:ES AP~D DATE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BENCHMARK CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DRAv.1NG NO, L-1 s, _________ s, __________ i~lav. ANGELINASOTELO Ollte: 12/05/23 FimChulf Data --! Dis!rict Engtnoor Date __ f Clra'M'! By i R.LA. 5254 Exp: 12/31/25 ' Br _______ Dm, __ :B,
"""·--' By,
Dato: ___ ,
Mohammad Sammak, Ctty Engtnoor I R.C.E.. 37145 Exp 05-30-2'1

SEE DETAJLED BLOCK ABOVE LEFT
PLANTING PL.AN, NOTES & DETAJLS FOR
255. 261, & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE

BLUFF REVEGETATION
1 SBGRSHEET 4 OF 8

BENCHMARK
OESCRt?TlOtr 6TO l-1fl" BAASSotSKS.O.CO. ENGR. STAM?E01.J 1051m· ~ATootA.liA.BEACH,AlONG't-WY101,0.5M!!.ENOFINTffiSECTIONOF't-ffN101AND VV.LA VAU.E.53 FTEOF CENTERLINE Of 'rNM 101,&2 FTWOf AT AADSFRRTRACKS, 24 FEETN OF PROJECTED CENTERLINE OF DAHLV..DRM., 6 FEET N Of PP J?1200111, A COPPER ROO 13.5 FEETOEE?\\lTHSTA.'IOARO O(SKSTAMPEO U 10! 1!1Se. T1CSR4W02 ~&3.7& ~M.S.L.

SO:...ANA BEACH ARE DEPARTMENT SANTA FE fRR!GAllON DISTRICT i s, ler
FimChh;f Oato I rnstrictEnginoor Daro

LANDSCAPE PREPARATION & PLANTING
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 SCOPE OF\\'ORK
A. WORK DISCUSSED IN TH!S SECTION INCLUDES THE FURNISHING OF All. LABOR, MATERIALS, ANO EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO COMPLETE WORK INDICAiEO ON THE DRAWINGS. THE w:>RK SHAJ.L BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE t.\1lH THE BEST STANDARDS OF PRACTICE RELATING TO THE VARIOUS TR.ADES AND UNDER THE CONTINUOUS SUPERVlstON OF A COMPETENT FOREMAN, CAPABLE OF INTERPRETING THE DRAv.1NGS, NOTES, ANO THESE SPECIFICATIONS.

B. IRRIOATIONANOLANOSCAPEWORKMAY BE DONE CONCURRENTLY, HQl.\'EVER, LANOSCAPEWORK MAY NOT START IN ANY SECTION PRIOR TO mS?ECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE SPRINKLER w::iRK C. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, LOCATE All ELECTRICAL CABLES, CONDUITS, SPRINKLER VALVES, ANO ALL UTILITY LINES SOlHAT PROPER PRECAUTIONS MAY BETAKEN NOTTO DAMAGE SUCH IMPROVEMENTS. INTHE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETVEEN SUCH LINES AND AREAS REQUIRING SOIL PREPARATION, PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE OV.flER, FAILURE TO FOlLOW THIS PROCEDURE PlACES UPON THE CONTRACTOR THE RESPONSIBllrt'Y FOR (AT HIS ONN EXPENSE) MAKING ANY AND ALL REPAIRS FOR DAMAGE RES UL TING FROM V>JORK HEREUNDER,

1.02 SWMITTALS
A. CERTIFlCATIONS OF CONFORMANCE OR COMPUANCE: IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER CERTIFICATES SPECIAED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RJRNISH A CERTIFICATE'h'ITH EACH DELIVERY OF BULK MATERIAL STATING THE SOURCE, QUANTITY, TYPE OF MATERIAL.AND THAT THE MATERIAL CONFORMS TOTHESPECIACATION REQUIREMENT. THESE CERTIFlCATESSHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE O'l.flER PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MNNTENANCEPERIOD.

AFTER THE SOIL HAS BEEN PREPARED AS CALLEO FOR IN THE SECTION ON SOIL PREPARATlON, THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED ANO TESTED, AND CONDITIONS ARE FAVORABLE TO PLANT. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST APPROVAL TO START PLANTING FROM THE OWNER.

8. AGRiCULTURAL SUffAe.l'LITY SOIL TESTS SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR (AT THE DIRECTION OF THE LANOS'"'-APE ARCHITECT) AFTER ROUGH GRADING IS COMPLETED ANO CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST sotL AMENDMENTS ACCORDINGLY.

PART 2 - DELIVERY AND STORAGE

2.01 DELlVERY
A. PROVlOE NOTIACATION OFTHEOEUVERYSCHEDULE IN ADVANCE SO MATERIAL MAYBE INSPECTED UPON ARRWALATTHE JOO SITE. REMOVE UNACCEPTABLE MATERIAL FROM THE JOB StTEIMMEDtATEl.Y, B. PROTECT Pi.ANTS DURING OELWERYTOPREVENTDAMAGETOTHE ROOT BALLS OR DESICCATION OF LEAVES.

C. DELIVER PESTICIDES OR OTHER CHEMICALS TO THE SITE lt'THE ORIGINAL, UNOPENED CONTAJNERS.

CONTAINERS THAT DO NOT HAVE A LEGIBLE LABEL THATIDENTIAES THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANUFACTURER'S REGISTERED USES 'MLL BE REJECTED.

2.02STORAGE
A. KEEP GYPSUM ANO FERTILIZER IN DRY STORAGE AND AWAY FROM CONTAMINAf'.lTS.

B. STORE AND PROTECT PLANTS NOT INSTALLED ON THE DAY OF ARRIVAL AT THE SITE AS FOLLOWS 1, OUTstOESTORAGE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROMTHE'MND.

2. KEEP PLANTS, INCLUDING THOSE IN CONTAINERS, IN A MO(ST CONDmON BY WATERING 'MTH A RNE MIST SPRAY.

3. SEPARATEPLANTSTOPREVENT DAMPING OFF.

C. DO NOT STORE CHEMICALS ANO HERBICIDES!MTHANYOTHER LANDSCAPE MATERlALS. STORE IN AN APPROVED, LOCKED, SEPARATE STRUCTURE OR VEHICLE.
203 HANDLIN::;
A. PLANTS: TAKE CARE TO AVOID DAMAGING PLANTS BEING MOVED FROM THE NURSERY OR STORAGE AREA TO THE PLAtffiNG SITE. HANDLE ALL PLANTS CAREFULL YTO AVOfO CRACKING OR BREAKING THE ROOT BALL. 00 NOT HANDLE PLANTS BY THE TRUNK OR STEM, REMOVE DAMAGED Pt.ANTS OR Pi.ANTS v.tni BROKEN OR CRACKED ROOT eAU.SFROMTHESrTE.

B. SPECIMEN PLANTS SHALL BE PLAf'.lTEO, MULCHED, OO'fEO, ANO IN A BASH-.1 ANO FERTILIZED 1MTHIN -48 HOURS AFTER REMOVAL FROM PRE\/lOUS LOCATION.

2.04 JOB CONl.lTIONS PLANTING CONDmONS: PLANTING SHALL NOT BE DONE WHEN THE GROUND IS MUDDY OR IN AN UNSATISFACTORY CONDITtoN FOR PLANTING.

2.05 GUARANTEE
WORK SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PROVISIONS, EXCEPT THAT PLANT MATERl.4.1. SHALL BE GUARANTEED THROUGH THE PLANT MAINTENANCE PERIOD. ALL PlANTINGS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR AS LONG AS THE CONTRACTOR JS MA\f'.ITAINING THE LANDSCAPING, ',\'!TH THE EXCEPTION THAT SOX;ED TREES SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR. ANY MATERIAL THAT IS NOT GROY,U./G PROPERLY OURlNG THIS PERtoO SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WITHtN SEVEN {7) OAYSAfTER THE RECEIPT OFA WRITTEN NOTICE BY THE OWNER. AI.L PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR THE ORIG(NAL PERICO, STARTING FROM THE DATE OF REPLACEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR'S GUARANTEE MAY BE EXTENDED BY THE ONNER IN CASES WHERE PLANTS ARE SLo.\lTO ESTABLISH. IF THE CONTRACTOR FAJLSTO MAKE REPlACEMEHTSY..tTHIN THE TIME LIMIT, THE O'l.'NER MAY REPLACE THEM AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AFTER DULY NOTIFYING HIM.

PART 3 - PRODUCTS

3.01 GYPSUM AND PH ADJUSTERS
A. GYPSUM. COMMERCIALLY PACKAGED, FREE FLO'MNG GYPSUM COf'.lTAINING NOT LESS THAN 95 PERCENT, BY VOLUME, OF CALCIUM SULPHATE AS ACTIVE mOREOIENT
B. Fl..O'NABLEGYPSUM SHALL BEA CALCIUM SULFATE, OIHYORATE, EOUIVALENTT05.7 LBN.S. GALLON.

C. SULFUR: SHALL BE ELEMEHTAL, OO't, PURE.

3.02 SOIL CONDfftoNERS
USE INOMOUALLY OR IN COMBINATION AS REQUIRED TO MEET SPECIAED REQUIREMENTS FOR TOP~l. • A. ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENT: SHALL BE DERIVED FROM WOOD (RESIDUAL PRODUCTS) FROM THE BARK OF PINE WHITE FIR AND RED FIR, CEDAR SHAVINGS OR REO\--YOOO SHAVINGS. AMENDMENT UPONANALYstS SHAU CONTAIN AT LEAST 0,5% NITROGEN BASED ON ORYWEIGHTIMTH AN ASH CONTENT NOTTO EXCEED 10%.A COMMERCIAL GRADE

PRODUCT SHALL BE USED, WTH A SAMPLE ACCOMPANIED BY AN APPROVED LABORATORY ANALYSIS WTH THE FOl..LO'-l.'ING: GUARANTEE- vm cu. YO."' 560-8:ZOl..SS.; PH LESS THAN 5.5, SALINllY ECE LESS THAN 2.5 M1LLIMOHS / CC, IRON EXPRESSED AS METALLIC= 0.1 %

USE INDMDUALL Y OR IN COMINNATION AS REQUIRED TO MEET SPECIAED REQUIREMENTS FOO TOPSOIL PARTICLE SIZE: MINIMUM PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING'
NO. 1 MESH SCREEN .2%
NO. 5 MESH SCREE~l 35%
NO. 8 MESH SCREEN 25%
NO. 12 MESH SCREEN 30%
NO. 32 MESH SCREEtl 5'l4

3.03 FERTILIZER
A. FERTILIZER: ONLY IF NOT SUPERCEDED BY A SITE SPECIFIC AGRICULTURAL SOILS REPORT, USE A COMPLETE COMMERCIAL, GRANULAR FERTILIZER CONTAIWNGTHE FOLLO'MNG MINIMUM PERCENTAGES, BY WEIGHT, OF Pt.ANT FOOD NUTRIENTS:
6% AVAILABLE NITROGEN
2% AVAIi.ABLE PHOSPHORUS
4%AVAILABLE POT ASSUM
5% SULFUR
SUCH~ TRK ORGANIC FERTILIZAER
B. FERTILIZER PLANTING TABLETS: TIGHTLY COMPRESSED FERTILIZER CHIPS FORMING A TABLET THAT IS INSOLUBLE IN WATER, IS DESIGNATED TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS RELEASE OF NUTRIENTS FOR AT LEAST 24 MONTHS

ANO CONTAINS THEFOLLO'MNG MINIMUM PERCENTAGES, SYYISGHT, OF PLANT FOOD NUTRIENTS 20% AVAILABLE NITROGEN
10%AVAILA.BLEFHOS?HORUS
5% AVAILABLE POTASSIUM
Pt.ANTltiO TABLETS SHALL WElGHT APPROX!MATEL Y 21 GRAMS EACH FOR TREES AND SHRUBS ANO 5 GRAMS FOR GROUND COVER Pt.ANTS.

C. IRON CHB.ATES. CONTAINING 10 PERCENT IRON AS METAi.UC.

COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO. CDP 6-99-100

3.04 PLANTS
A. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FURNISHED IN THE QUANTITIES AND/ OR SPACING AS SHOWN, OR NOTED FOR EACH LOCATION, AND SHALL BE OF THE SPECIES, IQNDS, Sl'ZES, ETC., AS SYMBOl..tZED ANOK>R DESCRIBED IN THE ORAIMNGS.

PLANT ~MES INDICATED OR LISTED ON THE DRAWNGS CONFORM TO "STANDARD PLAUT ~MES" ESTABLISHED BY THE AMERICAN JOIITTCOMMrrrEEON HORTICULTURAL NOMENCLATURE, EXCEPT FOR NAMES NOT COVERED HEREIN, THE ESTABLISHED CUSTOM OF THE NURSERY IS FOLLOWED.

8. PWmNG STOCK: Fl.ANTiNG STOCK SHALL BE v.El.L-8RANCHEO AND WE:U,-FORMEO, SOUND, VIGOROUS, HEALTHY, AND FREE FROM DISEASE, SUNSCALE, V-.1NOBURN, ABRASION, AND HARMFUL INSECTS OR INSECT EGGS, AND SHALL HAVE HEALTHY, NORMAL. ANO UNBROKEN ROOT SYSTEMS.A.ND NOT ROOT BOUND. SHRUBS SHALL BE SYMMETRICALl YOFNELOPEO, Of UNIFORM HASITOF GROWTH, ',\,1TH STRAJGHTBOLES OR STEMS ANO FREE FROM OSJECTIONABLE OISAGUREMENTS. SHRUBS SHALL HAVE YF-1.L DEVELOPED SYMMETRICAL TOPS\\1TH TY'PtCAL SPREAD OF SAANCHES FOR EACH PARTICULAR SPECIES OR VARIETY. GROUND COVERS ANO VINES SHALL BE VIGOROUS, HAVE

THE NUMBER ANO LENGTH OF RUNNERS, AND CLUMP SIZE SPECIAED, ANO BETHE PROPER AGE FOR THE GRADE OF PLANTS SPECIFIED. ONL YVINES ANO GROUND COVER PLANTS WEll ESTABLISHED IN REMOVABLE CONTAINERS,

INTEGRAL CONTAJNERS, OR FORMED HOMOGENEOUS SOIL SECTIONS SHALL BE USED, PLANTS SHALL NOT BE PRUNED PRIOR TO DELNERY, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. IN NO CASE SHALL TREES BE TOPPED BEFORE DELIVERY.

C. SIZES OF PLANTS: SHA.LL BEAS STATI:O IN THE PLANT LIST. CONTAINER STOCK (1 GALLON, 5 GALLON) SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN IN CONTAINERS FOR A PERtOO OFTIME SUFFlCIENTTO DEVELOP ROOT GROWTH SUFftCIENT TO HO!.OTHESOIL BALL TOGElliER TO THE SIDE ANO BOTTOM OF THE SUFRCIENTTO HOLOTHESOIL BALL TOGETHER TO THE stDE ANO BOTTOM OF THE CONTAINER IN WHICH IT WAS DELIVERED. THE HEIGHT AND SPREAD OF All PLANT MATER LAL SHALL BE MEASURED WITH BRANCHES IN THEJR NORMAL POSITION; ANO SHALL BEAS ttlOlCATED ON THE ORAY/JNGS, ntECALIPER OF ALL TREES SHA.LL BE MEASURED Z-0- ABOVETHESURFACEOFTHE GROUND. WrlERE CALIPER OR OTHER DOAENSONSOF .A.NYPl..ANT MATERIALS ARE OMITTED FROM THE DRAYJINGS IT SHALL BE AVERAGE STOCK FOR TYPE LISTED.

0. PLANT MATERIAL' PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BENURSERYGROVJN, UNLESSOTHER'MSE INDtCATEO.

GROUND COVER PLANTS SHALL 8E WELL ROOTED CUTTlNGS GRO._.,,. ltf FLATS AND SHALL REMAlt~ IN THOSE FLATS UNTIL PLANTED.

E. SEED FOR HYDROSEEOING: ALL SEED IS TO BE DELIVERED TO THE JOB SITE, umAIXEO, IN SEPARATE SEALED CONTAINERS. EACH SEALED CONTAINER V.,LL BEAR THE SEED SUPPUERS' TAGS WHICH SHALL INDICATE THE CONTAINER v.€1GHT, SEED TYPE, SEED PURITY. ANO SEED GERMINATION. ALL SEED SHALL BE LABELED ACCORDING TO STATE ANO FEDERAL SEED LAWS. A SAMFLE OF EACH SEED TYPEwtLL BE DRAWN BEFORE SEEDING TO ASSURE THAT SEED SPECIACA.TIONS HA.VE SEEN MET. PLANT NAMES INDICATED OR LISTED INTHE"LIST OF PLANT MATERIALS- ON THE DRA'MNGS MUST CONFORM TO"STANOARD PLANT NAMES- ESTABLISHED BY THE AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON HORTICULTURAL NOMENCLATURE. wt-lEN NAMES ARE NOT COVERED THEREIN, THE ESTABLISHED CUSTOM OF THE ,WRSERY IS FOLLONED.

1. PLANT LIST: AS INDtCATED ON DRAWINGS.
2, SAMPLES, TESTS, AND INSPECTIONS: SOURCE OF MATERlAL SHALL BE FURNISHED IF REQUESTED BY THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
3, MULCH FOR HYOROSEEOlNG· EACH PACKAGE OF CELLULOSE SHALL SHOW AIR-ORYWElGHT. FIBER 'M:IGHT SHALL BE EQUIVALENT TO TEN PERCENT MOISTURE AS BASED ON THE TECHNICAL ASSOClATION OF PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR AIR-DRY CELLULOSE.
-4. SLURRY FOR HYOROSEEOINO: NOGRO'IJTH INHIBffiNG MATERl.4.1. SHALL BE PERMITTED IN THE HYOROSEED SLURRY, F, SUBSTITUTIONS: SUBSTITUTIONS FOR THE rnDtCATEO PLANT MATERIALS v.'lll BE PERMITTED, PROVIDED THE SUBSTIT\JTE MATERIALS ARE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND THE SUBSTTTlJTIOt~S ARE MADE AT NO AOotTIONAL CHARGE TO THE OWNER. EXCEPT FOR THE VARIATIONS SO AUTHORIZED, ALL SUBSTITI.JTE ~NT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE SPECIACATIONS. IF ACCEPTED SUBSTITUTE MATERlALS ARE OF LESS VALUE THAN ntOSE INDICATED OR SPECIFIED, THE CONTRACT PRtcE WILL BEAOJUSTEO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

G. APPROVAL ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION AND APPROVAL Of' cmNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE, BEFORE Pl.ANTING.ALL PLANTS SUPPLIED TO THE PROJECT {WHETHER PLANTED OR NOT) AAE SUBJECT TO REJECTION BYTHEO'l~ER OR HIS REPRESEITTATIVE. PLAf'.lTS NOT APPROVED SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE IMMEDIATELY ANO REPLACED .... 'ITH S\JITABLE PLANTS.

PART 4 - EXECUTION

4.01 SOIL PREPARATION SEQUEl'CE
A. NO SOIL PREPARATION SHAI..L BE PERFORMED UNTIL ALL STRUCTURES AND WALLS AND CONSTRUCTION ITEMS

ONCLUOING IRRIGATION MAINS) HAVE BEEN INSTALLED,
• B. SLOPES: THE LANDSCAPE Ceffi'RACTOR WILL RECEIVE ALL SLOPES AS IS. SOIL AMENDMENTS SUCH AS GYPSUM, IRON SULFATE, IF REQUIRED BY SOIL TEST, SHALL BE RAKED INTO THE UPPER 2" OF THE SOIL ONLY'NHERE PlANT1NG IS TO TAKE PLACE. OTHER SLOPE AREAS ARE NOT INCLUDED. SARVON IS REOUIREO,ANO IT SHALL BE APPLIED PER MANUFACTURING SPECIFICATIONS. SLOPES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO PLANTING TO INSURE THAT THEY ARE FREE OF EROSION, GULLIES, WEEDS, ANO OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS.

SLOPES SHALL NOT SE OISTURBEO IN A MANNER WHICH CHANGES THE SOIL CONDmON ESTABLISHED. IN PARTICULAR, SLOPES SHALL NOT BE MADE MORE PERMEABLE TO WATER, THUS CREATING AN UNSTABLE SURFACE AREA. • C, \\'EEO CONTROL; PRIOR TO ANY H'fOROSEEOING, IRRIGATE ALL PLANTING AREAS FOR APPROXIMATELY 1W() (2) WEEKS TO ENCOURAGE \'EEO SEED GERMINATlON, ALLON WEEDS TO GRo.\l u~mL THEY REACH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF TWO TO THREE (2 TO 3} INCHES AND THEN THOROUGHl.. Y SPRAY \\1TH •ROUND UP1'W". REMOVE ALL WEEDS PRIOR TO SEEDING. DO NOT ALLOW THE USAGE OF ANY PRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES OR "DOWPQN1'W" FOR WEED CONTR01., • D, H'roROSEEOING

1. SUPERVISION; ALL HYDROSEEOING IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.ANDTHEYSHAI..L, IF NECESSARY, BERELOCATEOASOlRECTEOAS PARTOFTHECONTRACT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL SUPERVISE THE HYOROSEEOlNG. 2, HYOROSEEOAPPLICATION. A SLURRY OF FERTILIZER, SEED, ANO WOOD PULP OR ABER SHALL BEAGITATEDTO PROVIDE A UNIFORM MIX. THE OPERATOR SHALL SPRAY THE AREA WITH A COMPLETE UNIFORM VISfBLE COA.T USING THE COLOR OF THE CELLULOSE ABER AS A VISUAL GUIDE. THE SLURRY SHALL BE APPLIED IN A OO'NNWARO DRILLING MOTION (EXCEPT ON stOPESWELLABOVETHEOPERATORJ VlAA FAH STREAM NOZZLE. THEMATERiALS SHOULD BE UNIFORMLY IMPREGNATED Vt'ITI-i SEED AND SHALL All.OW PEJlETRATION OF RAINFALL AND PERCOlATION Of MOISTURE INTO THE mlOERL YING SOIL.

THE HYOROMULCHING SLURRY COMPONENTS SHALL NOT BE LEFT IN TI-IE HYOROMULCH MACHINE FOR MORE THAN lWO HOURS. IF SLURRY COMPONENTS ARE LEFT FOR MORE THAN W.'O HOURS IN THE MACHINE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADO 50% MORE OF THE ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED SEED MIX TO ANY SLURRY MIX WHICH HAS NOT BEEN APPLIED 1MTHIN THE TWO HOURS AFTER MIXING. THE CONTRACTOR SHAI..L ADO 75% MORE OF THE ORIGINAL SEED MIX TO ANY SLURRY MIXTURE WHICH HAS NOT B-i:ceN APPLIED ElGHT HOURS AFTER MIXING, ANY MIXTURE \M-tlCH HAS NOT BEEN AP FLIED WITHIN 6 HOURS OF MOONG SHALL BE REJECTED ANO DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

3. SPEctAL CARE IS TO BE EXERCISED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT THE SLURRY FROM SEJNG SPRAYED ONTO ANY ADJACENT PLANTERS, PROPERlY, OR ONTO WALKS OR WALLS.ANY SLURRY SPRAYED ONTO THESE AREAS SHOULD SE CLEANED Off BY THE CONTRACTOR.
-4. GERMINATION STAGE IRRIGATION: WITHIN 12 HOURS AFTER HYOROMULCHING THE PLANTING AREAS, THE WATERING SEQUENCE SHOULD BE INITIATED. THE WATER SHOULD BE LEfT ON LONG ENOUGH TO MotSTEN THE SOIL THOROUGHLY TO ntE DEPTH OF THE SLURRY MULCH, TAl(JNG CARE NOT TO SUPER SATURATE OR WASH AWAY THE st.URRY ANO SEED.

THE CONTRACTOR WILL REPAIR ALL SEED WAS!-ilNG OR EROSION. A LIGHT, FREQUENT IRRIGATION SEQUENCE SHOULD CONTINUE UNTIL THE SEEDLINGS HAVE GRO'Ml BEYOND THE GERMINATION STAGE. ntE GERMINATION STAGE WLL RANGEFROM-45T060 DAYS.

6. PREPLANTING FERTILIZER MAY BE APPLIED WITH ntE HYDROSEED, FERTILlZER SHALL BE AN ORGANIC, PELLETED OR CHIP TYPE, UNIFORM IN COMPosmoN, FREE-FLCN,1NG, SUITABLE FOR APPLICATION 'MTH APPROVED EQUIPMENT, ANO DELIVERED TO THE SITE IN UNOPENED. ORIGlNAL COf'.lTAINERS, EACH BEARING THE MANUFACTURER'S STATEMENT OF GUARANTEED ANAL YSfS. FERTILIZERS SHALL BE AT RATES RECOMMENDED BY AGRICULTURAL SUITABIUTY SOIL TESTING :.~0~~~:i.t:::~~~~i. BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR As'rn GRO'NTH AND HEAL TH FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. AREAS THAT FAIL TO GRO'N SHALL BE RESEEDED UPON DIRECTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR IS SUBJECT TO A SXTY (60) DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD OF ntE RESEEDED AREAS.
i LANO..~ ARCHITECT OF\.YORK CITY APP~eD ~ES AP?'D DATE I RE COW.MENDED FOR APPROVAL I APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BENCHWAAK I I
I AS Sy: ANGELINA SOTELO Dato· 12/05123 i By- iBy Darn· I Drav.n By Mohammad Sammak. City Engirwer
I R.LA 5254 Exp· 12/31125 By: D.ih!: I R.C.E. 37146 Exp 06-30-24 I SEECETAILEOBlOCKABOVELEFT

4.02 ANAL GRADING
• A. EXCAVATION FOR PLANTING: PRJOR TO EXCAVATING FOR PLANT PITS, THE AREA SHALL CONFORM TO THE LINES AND GRADES SHO'IIN. VERIFY LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE DONE TO UTIUTYLJNES SHO'NN. IF UTILITY LINES NOT SHO.VN ON THE DRA'MNGS ARE ENCOUNTERED, NOTIFY THE O'h'NER IMMEDtATEL Y. IN THE EVENT THAT UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION WORK OR OBSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN TI-IE Pt.ANTING OPERATION, ALTERNATE LOCATIONS 'Nill BE SELECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LOCATION OPERATION WILL BE DONE AT ~lO EXTRA COST TO THE OWNER.
1, Pi.ANT PITS: DtG PITS BY ANY METHOD PROVIDED THAT THE PITS HAVE VERTICAL SIDES ANO FLAT BOTTOMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE CAUTION NOTTO OVER WATER PlANTS.
• B. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SET SO THAT, WHEN SETTLED, ntEY BEAR THE SAME RELATION TO THE REQUIRED GRADE AS ntE't' BORE TO THE NATURAL GRADE BEFORE BEING TRANSPLANTED. EACH PLANT SHALL BE PL.ANTED IN THE CENTER OF THE PIT ANO BACKFILLED, UNLESS OTHER'MSE SPECIFIED, V.1THTHE PREP AA ED SOIL NO SOIL 'Mll BE PERMITTED AROUND TRUNKS OR STEMS. ALL BROKEN OR FRAYED ROOT SHALL BE PROf'ERLY CUT OFF. USE EXCESSTOP~L TO FORM WATERING BASINS AROUND PLAf'.lTS. AMEND AS DESCRIBED IN NOTES ANO DETAILS.

1. WATER THOROUGHLY IMTH A SOlUTION Of' SUPERTI-lRiVEn,, PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER PlANTltID.

2. GROUND COVERS: 00 NOT REMOVE FROM FtATS AND CONTAINERS UNTIL IMMEOtATEl..Y BEFORE PLANTING. SPACE AT THE INTERVALS INDICATED, SUFFICIENTLY DEEP TO COVER ALL ROOTS. AFTER Pt.ANTING 100 PLANTS, WATER THOROUGHL Y'MTHA SOL\JTION OF SUPERTHRIVE"" PER MANUFACTURER'S SPEClRCATIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING, UNTIL ENTIRE AREA IS SOAKED, SMOOTH PLANTING AREAS AFTER PlANTING TO PROVIDE EVEN,

SMOOTH ANISH,
PART 5 - COMPLETION OF CONTRACT

5.01 RESTORATION ANO CLEAN-UP REMOVE EXCESS WASTE MATERIAL DAILY, 'MHEN PLANTING IN AN AREAISCOMFLETE, CLEAR THE AREA OF DEBRIS, SPOIL PILES, AND CONTAINERS, WHERE EXISTING PWffiNG BEDS HAVE BEEN SCARRED OR DAMAGED, RESTORE THESE DAMAGED AREAS TO ntEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION. REMOVE DISUSED EQUIPMENT AND IMPLEMENTS Of SERVfCE NlD LEAVE ENTIRE AREA INVOLVED IN A NEAT ACCEPTABLE CONOfTION SUCH AS TO MEET THE APPROVAL OF THE O'/vNER.

5.02 INSPECTIONS AND ON SITE REVleN
THE ONNER, HIS REPRESENTATIVE OR THE t.ANOSCAFEARCHITECTMAY MAKEPERIOOICON SITE REVIEWS DURING THE PLANTING.ANY FLANTSTHAT HAVE NOT BEEN HANDLED, SPOTTED OR PWITEO PROPERLY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL,ANO nH:YSHALL, IF NECESSARY, BE REPLACED OR RELOCATED AS DIRECTED AS PART OFTHECONTRACT. A PLANT MAY 8E REJECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR ANY REASON AT ANYTIME.

5.03 M.&JNTENANCE PERIOD
• A. OEFINmON. THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL BEGfN ON THE OATETHATTHE OWNER OR DULY APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE INSPECTS AND GtVES WRITTEN PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE 'IIORKANO SHALL CONTltlUE FOR 1 YEAR FROM THAT DATE.
• B. MAINTENANCE: w.JNTAIN ALL PLANTING AREAS IN A VlGOROUS, THRIVING CONOmON BY WATERING, CULTIVATING, SPRA'r1NG, AND ANY OTHER NECESSARY OPERATIONS DURING THE ENTIREPERJOD OF THE INSTALLATION ANO u~rnL ANAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER.
• C, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN All AREAS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK, THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMEITT PERIOD, ANO UNTIL ANAL ACCEPTANCE OF ntEWORK. • 0. THE ENTIRE PROJECT SHALL BE SATISFACTORILY MAlf'.lTAINEO FOR A PERIOD OF 1 YEAR COMMENCING FROM THE TIME ALL ITEMS OF IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPE Pl.ANTING WORK HAVE SEEN COMPLETED AS SPECIAEO IN THE FOREGOING ARTICLES OF THESE SPECIAL PROVISfONS ANO TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE O'I.NER, • E. ESTABUSHMENT\\'ORKINCLUDESALL WATERING, 'M:EDINO, PLANTING, CULTIVATING, SPRAYING, NECESSARY TO SRING THE PLANTED AREAS TO A HEALTHY GRO'MNG CONDITION, AND ANY AODffiONAl \.\'ORK NEEDED TO KEEP THE AREASNEAT, EDOED,ANOATTRACTIVE.
• F. DURING THE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, ALL PLANTS AHO PLANTED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT WELL ANO WEED-FREE AT ALL TIMES, PLANT BASINS SHALL BE AS tlEEOED. • G.ANY DAY THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO ADEQUATELY WATER. REPLACE UNSUITABLE PLANTS, .,_./EEO, AND OTHER WORK DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY BY THE Ql,\'NER, 'MLL NOT BE CREDITED AS PART OF THE '-WNTENANCE PERIOD. • H, DURING THE MAINTENANCE PER/00, AtN Pl.ANT INDICATING WEAKNESS OR PROBASllfTY OF DYING, SHALL BE REPI.ACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS 0.-.'N EXPENSE.
• LALL BASINS AROUND PLAITTS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A <!-1fl" INCH DEPTH THROUGHOUT MAltlTENANCE PERIOD, UNLESS OTHER'MSE INSTRUCTED BY THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. • J. CONSTANT DILIGENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO DETECT THE PRESENCE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, ANO/OR RODENT INFESTATIONS ANO PROPER PREVENTATIVE OR CONTROL MEASURES TAKEN. • K. AT COMPLETiotl OF ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, ALL AREAS INCLUDED m THE CONTRACT SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY CLEAN ANO FREE OF Ot:73RIS AND WEEDS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE LIVE, HEALTHY, ANO FREE OF INFESTATIONS. • L. ANY EROSION OR SLIPPAGE OF SOIL CAUSED BY WATERING SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE.

5.04 'NRITTEN NOTICE
AT TI-IE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESENT 'NRITTEN NOTICE TO THE O'NNER ntAT HE

HAS SUBSTANTIALLY COMFLETEO THE REQUIRED WORK AND WANTS TO START MAINTENANCE AS OF A DATE MENTIONED IN THE NOTICE. AT ntE ENO OF SPECIFIED MAJNTENANCE PERIOD, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESENT '/.RITTEN NOTICE TO THE 0\-VNERTHAT HE HAS COMPLETED THE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE, AND THAT ANY FURTHER MAINTENANCE 'MLL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THAT OWNER.

5.05 FINAL INSPECTIO."J AND ACCEPTANCE
A. ANAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE IN '/.RffiNG, OF LANDSCAPING WORK 'Mll BE MADE AFTER REPLACEMEf'.lT, FERTILIZING, ANO CORRECT NE MAINTENANCE HAVE SEEN COMPLETED.

I
I CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I OOAWING NO, L~2 i PLANTING SPECIFICATlONS FOR
255,261, & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE

BLUFF REVEGETATION
lssGRI SfEET 5 OF 8

PACIFIC A V E N U E
¥1
TEEOFFEX!SffiG

IRRIGATIONMANUN

OR CONNECT
HOSE81B

EXISTING RESIDENCE
265 PACIFIC AVENUE

BENCHMARK
OESCRt?ilON· STD 2-1ll' BRASS 04SKS.O. CO. ENGR. STAMPED 'LJ 10a 19&" ~
LOCAilON AT SOLAl{A.SEACH,AlONG tNN 101, 0.5 MflENOFINTERSECT>ON OFI-NN 101 AND S3 FT EOF CENTERLINE OF tN/Y 101,al FTWOF AT ANDSFRR iRACKS, ;1:,4 FEETN OF PROJECTED CENTERLINE OF DAHt.lA. DRIVE. 5 FEET N OF f'P JP12SOM. A COPPER ROO 13.5 FEETOEE.PWITHSTANOARO OISKSTAMPED W HM 19&, T14S R-'W02 ~GJ.7& ~M.Sl..

TEEOFFEXISfflG

11.RIGAllOtlMJJULttE

OR COOHECTTO HOSE BIB

EXISTING RESIDENCE
261 PACIFIC AVENUE

EXISTING RESIDENCE
255 PACIFIC AVENUE

TEE OFF EXISTING
IRRKil,llOtlMAl4UNE
OR CONNECTTOHOSE 818
IRRIGATION PLAN SCALE1""10:.0"
COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO. CDP 6•99•100
[Al NOTE· Pl.AN IS DIAGRAJ,W,ATlC,

IRRIGATION LEGEND

SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEUDESCRIPTION PSI GPM DETAIL
HUNTER MP3000 PRQS-OQ.pRS30 A
ASOVEGRAOESHRUBROTATOR,AXED-RISER,PRESSURE 30 3.15 DETAILF,SHEET7 REGULATED TO30 Pst, MP ROTATOR NOZZLE B=BLUEADJ
ARC 90-210, Y=YELLOW ADJ ARC 210-270, A=GRAY 350 ARC.

HUNTER MP3000 PROS-QO.PRS30 B
ABOVE GR.ADE SHRUB ROTATOR, AXEO-ruSER, PRESSURE 30 3.15 DETAIL F, SHEET 7 ®
REGULATED TO 30 Pst, MP ROTATOR NOZZLE B=Bl.UEADJ
ARC 90-210, Y=YELLOW ADJ ARC210-270, A--GRAY 360 ARC.

MANUFACTURER/MODEUDESCRIPTION
HUNTER PGV../>SV
3/41N. PLASTIC ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VAJ..VE, \\1TH

REMOVABLE ANTI-SIPHON CAP, AND FLOW CONTROL, FOR
RESlDENTIAL USE. INLET/OUTLET: FEMALE NPT THREADS.

TRUE UNION BALL VALVE.

THREADED PL>\STIC BALL VAf..VE. QUARTER-TURN

SHUTOFF DESIGNED FOR IRRIGATION, SPAS, POOLS AND
OTHER GENERAL COLD WATER APPLICATIONS. 125 PSI
RATlt~. SAME SIZE AS MNNLINE.

HUNTER HC-12
12 STATION IRRIGATION CONTROLLER \\'ITH 1/d-Fl CONNECTION

HUNTER RFC
R.AJN AND FREEZE SENSOR, WITH CONDUIT INSTALLATION,
MOUNT Af3 NOTED. NORMALLY a.OSEO &.\'ITCH.

HUNTER HC-075-fLOW
3/41N. FLOW METER FOR USE 1MTH HYDRA'MSE ENABLED
CONTROLLER TO MONtTOR FLOW AND PROVIDE SYSTEM
ALERTS. Al.SO FLNCTIONS Af3 STAND ALONE FLOW
TOTALIZER/SUB METER ONAfN REstDENTI.Al IRRIGATION
SYSTEM.

WATER METER
EXISTil'-i3 DOMESTIC WATER METER TO REMAIN
ABOVE GROUND IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
- - - - ABOVEGROUNDIRRIGATIONMAlNltNE·PI/CSCHEDULE40
VIWONumber
v--
------Vl!MoSize
DETAILA.SHEET7
DETAIL E, SHEET 7
DETAIL D, SHEET 7
DETAIL C. SHEET 7
DETAIL B, SHEET 7
DETAIL B, SHEET 7
DETAIL B, SHEET 7
LOCATE WJN. LATERAi. rniEAAD VALVES

INSOE PLANTED AREA

IRRIGATION NOTES
S.C. 1. OUE TO TllESENSITT/EHATIJRE OfilHS COMTAL BLUFF, TEMPORARY IRRIGATIOH SHAL.l. BEACCOUPUSHED BY MANUALLY OPERA.TEO WATERING, AS NECESSARY, UNDER lHE SUPERvUl:lH OfTHE CNMiER'S LAU OS CAPE tl.AM'EtW4CE CONTRACTOR. HANO WATERNG MAYBE ACCOUPUstiEO "1TH lHE USE OF LOW PRECll'fTATIOH RATE (,; .5'MR.) EMITTERS AT EACH SHRU!, BUT OOLYIF A MAtITEHNlCE PERSOO IS OH-SITE, l,IOtHTORtlG SAIi) IRR)GATIOO, OlHERWISE TllE IRRIGATION Stw.L HOT SE AllOWEO, S.C.2. THIS RECONSTRUCTED BLUFF SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY AHO LIMITED IRRIGATION lHA T NOST BE REMOVED v.miN ~5 DAYS OF PI..AUBlGS, UH LESS lHE OffilON OF 1.MOSCAPEARCHrrECT MOt!E TIME IS REOOIREO.

S.C.3. ~CE lliE HYOROSEEO M« lSHATIVE, IRRIGATlc:t4 SHAU SE APPLIED OOl Y AS NECESSARY TO PROMOTE lME GERMW.TIOH ANO EARLY GROWTH OF THE PWITl1GS,AHD THEREAFTER FOR UP TO 26 MOITTHS AITTR SEEOING, mo OOLY w, REQUIRED TO ~TAlf lHE PI.AITTliGS fl: A HEAl.lliYCONOJ'OOS.

S.C,4. BEFORETiiEEHO OF 6 MON'THSfflOTHE LmOSCAPEMAJ(TE!WlCE PERklD, CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST LOCATIOO Of XfRIBUGTOAVOOl SA1\JRATED ROOT CRCM«.

S.C.5.1HESETEMPORARY SYSTEMS SHALL BE DISCONNECTED AAD REMOVED WITHN 26 M-OOTHS AFTER PI.JHTING.

S.C.6, EXlSffiG SLOPES 00 THIS PROJECT A.I\E LARGE MID STEEP {MOSTLY

1.5:1 IN STEEFNESS). CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION AHO SAFETY N All MATTERS PERTAtiliG TO WORK ON THE SlOPE.

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL tNSTALL IRRtGATIOH SYSTEMS lHAT ARE COMPLETE AHDFUHCllONNG'1 EVERYWAY.

2. Pl.NlS ARE PRECISE, AHO YET O~GRAMMATIC. PRECISE LOCATION Of EMITTERS SHALL SE FIELD ADJUSTED TO MEET MflOR VAR~TIOOS fl PLAN. l. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AHO VERIFY All srre cooomoos, UTIUTIES, AHO SERVICES PRIOR TO BEGt.HNG OF WORK..
-'· CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECKNlO VERIFY WATER PRESSURE Of AT LEAST AT 50 PSIAT PONT OF CONHECTIOO (P.O,C,) PER Pl.AN, PR!OR TO BE<lNNNG OF WORK. NOTlfYLmDSCN'E ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCY.

5. POOT OF CONNECllON (P.O.C.) SHALL BE AT EXISTING HOSE ltti!B AT BACK OfHOUSE. Co«TRACTOR TO PROV10EAHEWVACWM BREMER AT
EX!SffiGHOSE BEIB FOR THIS PROJECT.
6, flUSH All PIPES CLOO PRIOR TO NSTALLNGEMITTERS.
7, OBTAtl: AN IRRl°"TIOO COVERAGEN'PROVAI.. FROM THE LmDSCA?E ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTNG. CONTACT lAADSCAPEARCHITECT AT tEAST 24 HOURS N ADVANCE Of DESIRED NSPECTIOO TUrlE.

8. PRCMOE Nffi.O~VAL\IES OF CORRECT LNE StZE WiERE FIELD CONDITIONS DEMAND, PER PI.MS,ANO!OR AS REQUIRED.

9. ALL "ORIP"IRRIGATJOO DEVICES, SHALLHAVEVALVESOOTSERVICE 'ORF' IRR~TION Alm EHALL BE Ii STALLED VdTHAH APPROVED ALTER, PER "-"'·
10, Al.l TRENCHES SHALL BE WETTED ANO RECOMPACTEO TOSO% tffilWJ.I UNDER FlATWORK ANO 85% IN P~GAREAS.
11, CONTRACTOR SHAU MOUNT IRRIGATIOO SCHEOULNG OOIOELNES iPROVlOEO BYlANOSCAPE ARCHrrECT)TO OWNER FOR MANUAL
OPERA1100.com'RACTOR IS REO, TOUSEUULTl?lE STAATS FOR EACH VALVE TO ACHIEVE DEEPWATERNG.

12. ·~surtr ORAVffiGS SHA1..t tl:ClUOE LOCATIONS OF ALL MAJIS, VAlVES, & EMITTERS, If D!FFERENTTIW, PLAAS. LOCATE BY OOIEHSIONNGFROM TWO FIXED PONTS {CONTRACTOR MAY USE A lllUEPRNT OfTHE
S?RNKI.ER PLAN AHO EOffN PERI.I.ANENT RED tiK FOR THE AS-aUlT ORAWNG.)
13, PROVIOETHE FOLL()'t'fflGTOOLS AND MATERIALS AS PART OfTHIS CONTRACT·
A. Al.t EOOl?lol!:NT OPERATIOtl lMMJALS AND GUARANTEES. e.. 1 PLASTIC SEALED l»AGMW OF SYSTEM AREAS.GIT REDUCED PRtffFROW IMOSCAPEARCHITECT.

C.1AS-6U1LTDRAWNGS.

SOLANA BEACH FlRE DEPARTMENT f SANTA FE IRRIGATION CXSTRICT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF \.\ORK OTY APPROVED CHANGES APCD DATE I RECOMMENDED FOR APPRrNN.. APPROVED FOR CONS1RUCTION BENCHMARK CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I sr f~ By. ANG!::LINASOTELO Dr.e: ~
FireChi&f __ , District.Engineer Dale --!Cra'MlBy R.LA,5254 E>:p·12f31/25 I By:

Date: __ _
Mohammad Sammal<, City En~nNr
R.C.E.. 37146 Exp 06-30-24
I SEE CET AILED BLOCK A50V'E LEFT

I IRRIGATION PLAN, NOTES& DETAILS FOR
I 255,261, & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE SBGR-
! BLUFF REVEGETATION St-EET 6 OF 8
NOTE•W<~
TOSUP?LYAHD
NSTAU U:FGR. ...,,_--~~--'
BATTERYV«niTHIS

NSTAUAOON
t. FACEOfEXTERIORWAl.l

2. BUllDNGWAU.
l, AUTO CONTIIOltER PER PLAHS
ANDSPECS,JNALCX:K.ASLE
VAHDALPROOF ,STAl(LESS

STEEL ENCLOSURE, PERLEGEHD
OR Al'r'RMO EOOAl, WALL
MOUNT PER MFGR'S PER SPECS.

MAKE ALL CONNECTIONS INstDE
CA!t<ET.
•. Mtt ll' RIGKI cosourr, PAtlTED
TO MATCH SURROONOltGS.

5. Wtl. lU • R)3U) CONDUIT,

PANTED TO MATCH
SURROUNDJ4GS,FOR 12<N
POWER S1.IPPl Y. PROVIOE
GROONO \'ARE FOR
CONTROUER. COORONATE
PQlh'ER SUPPlYCONNECTIOO
WIC1MiER,
fl. ANCHOil: CONOUfTTOWAU WI
GALV.Ft?ECI.AMPSN.D
APPROVED AHCHORS.

7. SWEEPELLS,TY?.

8. FNISHGAAOE.
..;t...;OTU;;.roT""'sco;;.Al~;;.;;..;A.;;..T_IC;..C;;.O;;;.;.;N.;;..T;.;R.;;;O.;;;L,;;,LE;;;.R;..;_ ________ --1@] RAIN / SOLAR SENSOR NOTTO SCALE NOTE: SAWCUT A l-114' (US!tm) DIA.. HOlE IN TOP OF
VALVE BOX UO TOAlltm FOR TRANSMITTER INSTALLATION'.
'
©- '
0 x ~ OF STRAIOOT Pl'
FREE Of FmltOS OR ELBOWS 5xW..OFS'i'RAA3HTPFE
fREE Of FITTflGS OR ELBOWS

1. BlJILOflGEAVE

2. RAWS0tAA SENSOR,
MOUNT AT 8UILONG
EAVE PER MFGRS.

SPECS.MUST BE

EXPOSED TO
UHO!STRUClcD THE
StJN,~FAlLAH0
CLEAR OfliUl.>SATt::m
SPRAY.

C
0 ~~!:~H;E~L~:~~~SUITTER
(DHCFlOYiMETER
0 WATERPROOf COOMECTORS (2)
© RECTAHGJl.ARVAlVEBOXPERPL.Afi
© SRK:K SUPPORTS AT EAOi CORNER ('l
© FILTER FABRIC
(D GRAYa BASE. OEPTii PER PLAN
@ II.A1'i LNE .AND Sot!. COVER PER Pl.AN
@li.l.fiLNEFITTNGPERPI.AN
@) FINISHED GRAOE
...;S;.;;U:.:;B;,.;-M.;.;.;E=..T;..:E:.;..R;...._ ____________ 11G HOTTOSCALE

BENCHMARK
~ST02-1f'r BRASS OiSKS.O. CO, a«m.STAMPEO"I..J 10$ 196!" LOCA'TIOH ATOOlANASEACH,AlONGHW'f101,0.5MiLENOFINTER:SECTIONOF'tY/Y101ANO ~E. 5.J FT EOFCENTERUNEOF rN/f101, !2:FTWOF AT N<OSFRR TRACl<S, 24 FEETN OF PROJECTED Ce-4TERUNE Of OAHU-' DRl\l'E, 5 FEET N Of PP J?1:WCl1. A COPPER ROD 13.5 FEET OEEPWITHSTANOAROtxSKSTAlliPED U 1~ 1•. T1ol.S R4W02 ~G3.7G ~M.S.l.

SOLANA BEACH FIRE OJ=...PARTMENT SANTA FE IRRIGATION [)STRICT I COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT NO. CDP 6-99-100
I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF \YORK OTY APPROVED CHAN3ES
I i
Fm1Ch10f Date OistrictEng¾ooer I
~ t ey. ANGELINA SOTELO Date· 12/05/23
Dra\\TIBy
Date __ R.LA. 5254 Exp· 12/31'25
AP?'O DATE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
By·
Date: __
~15"HOTROLLEO STEEL 'J'HOOK (2REQ'OJCOVEREO VtTIHPROTECTIVEVNYt. 1U!flG, WflOED TO I,( REi!AR STAl<E. TYPtCAL
UNDER GRCll.lND SCH.«! PVC MAl11.NE TO BAU
VALVE OR LATERAi. LNE TOSPRJ;KlERA.5

OCCURS,

1. 30-liCH ~EAR LEffGTli Of
'MRE,COltED

2. WATER PROOF CONNECTION
(10f2)

3. REMOTE COITTROL VALVE:

RANB-IRDAS-lf

4. NSTAU~CH t.Wi.AB-OVE
HIGHEST POtcT Of

DISCHARGE
5, WRAW.TIOHRESISTA.liT
PVC SCH '4 MALE ADAPTER
(10f2}

6. WRADtA.TIOHRESISTANT
PVC SCH«> Pf£ (1 Of 2)
FlUSHGRAOE
PVC SCH «I Ell (I Of 2)

9. PVCLATERALPJPE {10F2)
...;?;.;!...;TO.;;;~.;;..~.;;..A.;;;D_E;..P;..l;;..P.;;;E;..;.A..;;N.;.;D;;...;;;S..;.T;..A.;;;.B.;.;;IL_IZ_E_R_______ -;~ AUTOMATIC ANTI-SIPHON VALVE

NOTTO SCALE A
,------SHRUB ADAPTER SPRAY OR ROTOR HEAD,

SEE LEGEND FOR SPECIFICATION
~----SCH.BO PVC NIPPLEjS). SIZE PER tEAD lt,t.ET,
LENGTH AS REQUIRED, 1 Of 2
t=,il--------VANDAL-PROOFClAUP, 3MtNtMUM
LJl!-'------REBAR STAKE,#4X 30" LEHGTH
NOTIS
ULTRAVIOlET RESISTAHT PVC STREET ELLS, 2
REQUIRED, ANO lNR PVC TEE OR ELL
ULTRAV\OLET RESISTANT SCH. 40 PVC PIPE, SEE

PLANS FOR SIZE
Fl!'-ISHGRADE
#4:.;18' REBAR J..HOOK, SPACE
ATtO'O.C,(TYP)
ALL Pl?EINSTAl.lED ON GAAD€ TO BESCH, 40 ULTRAVIOLET RESISTN-ff PVC.

SPR!NKLER HEAD ASSEMBLY TO BElmITAl..LED PLUM!\
DO HOT INSTALL SPRINKLER HEAD ASSEMBLY CLOSER~ Tei (10) FEET TOSIDEWAlKS, CURBS, ORIVEWAYS OR PEDESTTUA,~ AREAS.

ON RECY'CLED SYSTEMS USE PURPLE WR SCH.40 PVC AND RISER MARKER tASas.

ON-GRADE SPRAY HEADS HOTTOSCAl.E
APPROVED FOR CONS1RUCT10N

0.t>•---1
Mohammad Sammak. City En;inlX!r
R.C.E.. 37148 Exp 06..J0.2-4
BENCHMA~.K
I SEEDETAlLEDBLOCKABOVELEFT

BALL VALVE HOT TO SCALE

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

I IRRIGATION PLAN OOTES& DETAILS FOR
• 255,261, & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE
, BLUFF REVEGETATION
BALLVIJ.VE
PVCw.NlNE

3.J4'0LA..

GRAVEL
StJMP.G'XG"
E
I OOAV.1NG NO. L-4
SBGRS>EET 7 OF 8

BENCHMARK

SOLANA BEACH ARE DEPARTMENT
By·
FimChfaf Data
I
I
SANTA FE IRRIGATION [)STRICT
I
s,
, Dis:rict Engineer Date

IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS
PART 1 - GENERAL
1,01 DESCRIPTION
A. 'r'.'ORK DISCUSSED IN THIS SECTION INCLUDES THE FURNISHIHG Of ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO COMPLETE WORK INotcATEO ON THE DRAWINGS. THE WORK SHAU. BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE vnTH THE BEST STAN DAROS OF PRACTICE RELATING TO THE VARIOUS TRADES AND UNDER THE

CONTINUOUS SUPERVISION OF A COMPETENT FOREMAN, CAPABLE OF INTERPRETING THE DRA'MNGS, NOTES, ANO THESE SPECIACATIONS.

B. IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPE WORK MAY SE DONE CONCURRENTLY, HOWEVER, PLAMllNG MAY NOT START IN ANY SECTION PRIOR TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE SPRINKLER WORK.

C, PRlORTO EXCAVATION FOR IRRIGATION PIPE, LOCATE ALL ELECTRICAL CABLE, CONDUITS, ANO AU UTILITY

LINES SO THAT PROPER PRECAUTIONS MAY BE TAKEN NOT TO DAMAGE SUCH IMPROVEMENTS OR EXISTING CONOITTONS. IN THE EVENT OF A CONFUCT BET'NEEN SUCH UNESANO PIPE LOCATIONS, PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE OVJNER \.\t!O SHALL ARRANGE FOR RELOCATION OF ONE OR THE OTHER. FAILURE TO FOlLOY/THIS PROCEDURE Pi.ACES UPON THE CONTRACTOR THE RESPONstBILJTY FOR (AT H!S O'Ml EXPENSE} MAKING ANY ANO All REPAIRS FOR DAMAGE RESULTING FOR WORK HEREUNDER,

1.02 SPEClAl CONllTIONS
THE GENERAL CONDfTIONSAREA PART OF THIS SECTION AND THE CONTRACT FOR THIS YIORK, ANDAPPLYTO THIS SECTION FULLY AS IF REPEATED HERE.

1.03GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

FURNISH AND INSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM, INCLUDING MN INCIDENTAL WORK NOT SHOWN OR SPECIAED 'M-IICH CAN REASONABLY BE INFERRED AS PART OF THE WORK, AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE AND Y>::>RKABLE SYSTEM.

1.04 \\ORK INCt.UDEO

THE FOLLO'MNG ITEMS ARE DETERMINED TO BE A PART OF THE IRRIGATION WORK (OR WORK OF LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR) WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE PLANS.

A. P.O.C. CONNECTION OF SYSTEM TO EX!STING WATER SUPPLY a. REVIEW OF UTILITY PLANS SHOV,,,,NG OTHER UNDERGROUND FACILmES.

C. TRENCHING AND BACKFILL

0. ALL IRRIGATION MATERtAL AND EQUIPMENT INDICATED ON DRA'MNGS.

E. WATER CONNECTION.

1.05 CODES, RULES, AND SAFETY ORDERS

ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN FULL ACCORDANCE YJITH THE LATEST RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE SAFETY ORDERS OF THE DfVtSION OF INOUSTRlAl SAFETY; THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE PUBLISHED BY THE\.\'ESTERN PLUMBING OFFICIALS' ASSOCIATION; AND OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS OR REGULATIONS. NOTHING

IN THESE DRA'MNGS OR SPECIACATIONS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE COOES.

1.06 SUBSTlnJTIONS AND APPROVN..
'M-IEREVER THE TERMS "APPROVE", •APPROVAL", OR "APPROVED EQUAL" ARE USED INTHE PLANS & SPECIRCATIONS, THEY SHALL MEAN THE APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRmNG.

1.07 SCt-EDULEOF'NORK
SCHEDULE AND COORDINATE HYDROSEEDINGANDWATER CONNECTIONS, ANO THE P!.ACEMENTOF MATERIAL AND EOUlPMENT IN A MANNER THAT WILL EFFECT 11-!E EARLIEST COMPLETION OF THE WORK IN CONFORMANCE Y.rrH THE CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS SCHEDULE.

PART 2 - DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING

2.01 NOTIFICATION
PROVIDE NOTIFICATION OF DELIVERY SCHEDULE IN ADVANCE SO MATERIAL MAY 6E INSPECTED UPON ARRIVAL AT THE J08 SITE. REMOVE UNACCEPTABLE MATERIAL FROM THE JOB SITE IMMEDIATELY.

2.02 PROTECTION
A. PROTECT WORK AND MATERIALS UNDER THIS SECTION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND STORAGE. POL YVlNYL CHLORIDE {PVC) POL YETHEl.lNE PIPE (P.E.) AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SHIELDED FROM DIRECT SUNLIGHT.

8. ASSUME ALL RESPONstBILITY FOR DAMAGE TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION ANO RESTORE PROPERTY TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDfTION SHOULD DAMAGE OCCUR ASA RESULT OF THE WORK OF THIS SECTION.

C, HANDLE PLASTIC PIPE AND ATTINGS CAREFULLY AND STORE UNDER COVER TO AVOID DAMAGE. BEDS ON 'M-IICH MATERIALS ARE STORED MUST BE FULL LENGTH OF PIPE TO AVOlD DAMAGE. ANY PIPE THAT HAS BEEN DAMAGED OR DENTED SHALL NOT BE USED IN THE 'NORK.

PART 3 - MATERIALS

3.01 GENERAL
All MATERlALS THROUGHOUT THE SYSTEM SHALL BE NEVI AND IN PERFECT CONO!TION. FOR ALL MATERIALS, AN INVOICE SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHCM-100 QUANTITIES OF MATERIALS.

3.02 ~SCRIPTION
A. PLASTIC PIPING· ALL MAIN W~E PIPE SHALL BE AN APPROVED BRAND, CLASS 315 PVC. ALL LATERAL P1PETO SPRINKLERS SHALL BE SCH 40 WR~PVC, TYPE 1120.1220 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE{PVC) PIPE. ALL PfPE SHALL CONFORM TOASTM D17e.5ANO ASTM 02241.

B. PLASTIC ATilNGSAND OTHER PARTS: SCHEDULE 40, POLYVIHYL CHLORIDE (PVC) STANDARD WElGHT, AS MANUFACTURED BY SlOANE, LASCO, OR AN APPROVED EQUAL, ASTM 02454, ASTM 02466, OR ASTM D2467 AS REQUIRED.

C. SOLVEITTCEMENT: COMPATl6LE'MTH PVC Pf PE AND Of PROPER CONSISTENCY. NO MIXING OF SOLVENT 'MTH THINNER WILL BE ALLO'NEO.

0. PIPE PRIMER COMPATIBLE V'.1TH PVC PIPE AND OF PROPER CONSl'STEt~CY.

E. DRIP EM MITERS OF MANUFACTURERS SPECIFIED IN LEGEND OF DRAW1NGS.

F. FLEXIBLE {BLACK STRIPE) TUSiNG ANO t»ST. TUBING.OF THE MANUFACTURE SPECIAEO IN LEGEND ON DRA'MNOS. DRIP?ER FLO'l-i RATE AND SPACING SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. / 1, ORI PLINE FITTINGS: All CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE UTH ORI PLINE (MANUFACTURE APPROVED) INSERT ATTINGS.

2. SOIL STAPLES :ALL ON-SURFACEINSTALLATIONSSHALL BE HELD IN PLACEV'J!TH SOIL STAKE DO'NNS SPACED EVENLY EVERY 5' ON CENTER, AN0\\1THTV'.'OSTAKEDCM-'NS ON EACH CHANGE OF LOCATION.

G. LINE FLUSHING VALVES. OF THE MANUFACTURE SPECIFIED IN LE~..ND ON DRAWINGS. ALL ORI PLINE SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLEO'IJITH AN AUTOMATIC LINE FLUSHUIG VALVES AS INDICATED ON ORA\\1NGS. DRIPllNE\\'ITH ltITEGRATED CHECK VALVES DO NOT REQUIRE AN AUTOMATIC LINE FLUSHING VALVE BUT MUST HAVE A MM.UAL FLUSHING PORT(S) IN THE POSITION THAT AN AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE \\'OULD BE POSTIONEO.

H. AlRNACUUM RELIEF VALVES: OF THE MANUFACTURE SPECIAED IN LEGEND ON DRAW1NGS. EACH INDEPENDENT DRl?l!NE SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION ZONE SHALL ~E l~ALLED YATH AN AIRNACUUM RELIEF VALVE AT THE ZONE'S HIGHEST POINT(S). OR!?llNE \\1TH INTEGRATED CHECK VALVES ZONES 00 NOT REQUIRE Mi AIRNACUUM REUEFVALVE.

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF WORK i Cl:TY APPROV'"'eO CHAN3ES APP'O DATE I RECOMMENDED FOR APPRCNAJ..

AS I By: ANGELINA SOTELO Date· 12/05/23 1 Ch'M"IBy
, R.LA.. 5254 Exp· 12131125 '
D,m·
By.

PART 4 - INSTALLATION

4.01 LAYOVT
A. LAYOUT WORK AS A CCU RATEL Y AS POSS16LE TO THE DRAWINGS, THE DRA'MNGS, THOUGH CAREFULLY DRAWN, ARE GENERALL y DIAGRAMMATIC TO THE EXTENT THAT PIPE NOT sttO'ltfl. JOB CONDmONs WILL NOT ALWAYS PERMIT LOCATING PIPING, VALVES, ANO HEADS'M-IERE SHO'h'N. WHEN THIS SITUATION OCCURS, IT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ~ER'S ATTENTION IMMEOIATEl Y AND THE RELOCATION DETERMINED IN A JOINT CONFERENCE. THE CONTRACTOR 'MLL BE HELO RESPONSfBLE FOR THE RELOCATING OF ANY ITEMS 'MTHOUT FlRST OBTAJNING OM-lER'S APPROVAL. HE SHALL REMOVE AND RELOCATE SUCH ITEMS AT HIS OWN EXPENSE IF SO DIRECTED BY THE CM-'NER.

6. MINOR CHANGES IN LOCATIONS TO THE ABOVE FROM LOCATIONS SHO'Ml SHALL BE MADE WHEN t»RECTED BY ~ER AT NO ADDmONAL COST {TO THE OWNER) PROVIDING SUCH CHANGE IS ORDERED BEFORE SUCH ITEMS OFV.'ORK, OR WORK DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO SAME ARE INSTALLED, AND PROVIDING NOAoomONAL MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED.

4.02 EXCAVATING AND TRENCHII\G {00 TRENCHING ON SLOPE).

A. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, LOCATE ALL UTILmES. SEE NOTE 1,01 CAT THE BEGINNING OF THIS SECTION.

PERFORM ALL EXCAVATIONS AS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE 'M:iRK INCLUDED UNDER THIS SECTION, INCLUD1NG SHORING OF EARTH BANKS TO PREVENT CAVS.lNS. RESTORE ALL SURFACES, EXISTING UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS, ETC .. DAMAGED OR CUT ASA RESULT OF THE EXCAVATIONS, TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION AND IN A MANNER APPROVED BY OY.'NER.

B. All TRENCHES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES FROM PAVING. TRENCHING ADJACENT TO STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEARLY OUTSIDE THE ANGLE OF INFLUENCE OF FOOTINGS (A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE1WICE THE DEPTH FROM ANlSHED GRADE TO THE TOP ONE THIRD OF THE FOOTING).

C. TRENCHES SHALL BE MADE 'MOE ENOUGH TO AUOW A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES BETVlr'EEN PARALLEL PIPE LINES.

MAINTAJN A MINIMUM OF 1 lNCH VERTICAi. CLEARANCE BET'\-'IEEN LINES. TRENCHES FOR PIPE LINES SHALL BE MADE OF SU FR Cl ENT DEPTHS TO PROVIDE THE Mlt.lMUM COVER FROM RNISH GRADE OF 12-fNCH MINIMUM COVER OVER LATERAL LINES TO HEADS.

1. 18,..lNCH MINIMUM COVER OVER MAINLINES TO REMOTE CONTROL VALVES.

2. 12-1:NCH MINIMUM COVER OVER LATERAL LINES TO HEADS.

D. MAINTAlN ALL WARt.lNG SIGNS, SHORING, BARRICADES, FLARES, AND RED SIGNAL LAITTERNS AS REQUIRED BY THE SAFETY ORDERS OF THE DMSON OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND ANY LOCAL ORDINANCES.

4.03 PIPE LINE ASSEMBLY
A. BACKR.OW PREVENTER INSTALL 12-tNCH MINIMUM ABOVE GRADE 'MTH CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS.

B. REMOTE CONTROL VALVES- INSTALL YJHERE SHOWN. GROUP TOGETHER 'MiERE PRACTICAL. PLACE NO CLOSER THAN 3 INCHES ANO PARALLEL TO PAVING, AND HOUSE IN VALVE BOXES 'MTH TOPS SET TO GRADE. c. PLASTIC PIPE ANO ArnNGS: PIPE MAY BE ASSEMBLED AND'MELOEO ON THE SURFACE. SNAKE PIPE FROM SlDETO stOE OF TRENCH BOTTOM TO ALLON FOR EXPANstON ANO CONTRACTION. SOlVENT.JNELD PLASTIC Pt PE ANO FTTTINGS, usmo SOLVENTS AND METHODS AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER OF THE PIPE, EXCEPT 'M-IERE SCREWED CONNECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED OF DtRT, OUST,AND MOISTURE BEFORE APPLYING SOLVENT, INSTALL PIPE AT TEMPERATURES OVER 40 DEGREES F.

IMPORTANT!-CLEAN OFF EXCESS SOLVENT.ALL WELDED JOINTS SHALL CURE AT LEAST 15 MINUTES BEFORE MOVING OR HAN DUNG, ANO AT LEAST 24 HOURS BEFORE WATER IS PERMITTED IN THE PIPE.

0. PLASTIC TO METAL PIPE CONNECTIONS MAKE All CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PLASTIC PIPE AND METAL PARTS OR PlPE'MTH THREADED ArnNGS UstNG PLASTIC MALEADAPTERS.APPlY A NON-HARDEN1t<Ki PIPE DOPE OR TEFLON TAPE TO MALE THREADS. TAKE UP 'MTH LIGHT'h'RENCH PRESSURE.

E. DRIP EMMITERS· INSTALL ON HIGH SIDE OF PLANT BASN
F. PLUGGING PIPE: CAP OR PLUG All OPENINGS AS SOON AS LINES HAVE BEE~~ INSTALLED TO PREVENT THE

ENTRANCE OF MATERIALS THAT COULD OBSTRUCT THE PIPE, AND LEAVE IN PLACE UNTIL REMOVAL IS NECESSARY FOR COMPLETION OF INSTAllATION,
G. FLUSHING IRRIGATION SYSTEM:THOROUGHLY FLUSH OUT ALL WATERLINES, THEN INSTALL HEADS, VALVES, AND OTHER HYDRANTS. TEST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLO'MNG GUIDELINES:

1. REQUEST THE PRESENCE OF O'M~ER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE AT LEAST FORTY--E!GHT (48) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF TESTING. TEST IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED AT THE EXPENSE OF CONTRACTOR, AND IN THE PRESENCE OF THE O'M4ER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE IF SO DESIRED, OR 'A'ITH St.lBMITTAl OF RECORDED RESULTS OFTEST.

2. CENTER LOAD PIF'tNG \\UH SUFACIENT AMOUITT Of BACKFILL TO PREVENT ARCHING OR SLIPP1NG UNDER PRESSt.lRE. APPLY CONTINUOUS WATER PRESSURE OF THE NUMBER OF POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH sPECIFlEO ON THE PLANS AT THE POIITT OF CONNECTION.

A. PRESSURE LINES TO BE TESTED FOR FOUR HOURS.

B. LATERAL UNESTOBETESTED FOR TWO HOURS.

3. REPAIR LEAKS RESULTlt~G FROM TESTS ANO RETEST UNTIL SYSTEM MEETS SPECIFIED TESTS.

H. DRIPPERLINE INSTALLATION:

1.INSTALLALL FLEXIBLE PIPE(BLACKSTRIPE)TUBINGAS INDICATED ON DRA'MNGS< USEONL YTEFLON TAPE ON ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS.
2, CLAMP FLEXIBLE P!PE(BLACKSTRIPE) TUBING ATTINGS.....rrn GALVANIZED STAKE DO'~ MOO, ITOS-050 W!aENO, BY RAINSIRD C 5' O.C. MAX

3. CAP OR PLUG ALL OPENINGS AS SOON AS UNES HAVE BEei INSTALLED TO PREVENT THE INTRUSION OF MATERIALS THAT V'.'OULD OBSTRUCT THE PIPE. LEAVE IN PLACE UNTIL REMOVAL IS NECESSARY FOR COMPLETION OF lt~STALLATION.

4. THOROUGHL YFLUSH ALL WATER LINES BEFORE INSTAUING VALVES ANO OTHER HYDRANTS.

5. TEST IN ACCOROANCEV.'TTH PARAGRAPH ON HYDROSTATIC TESTS. t UPON COMFLETION OF THE TESTING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ASSEMBLY AND ADJUST SPRINKLER HEADS FOR PROPER DISTRlaUTION.

4.04 BACKFILL ANO COMPACTING
A. AFTER SYSTEM IS OPERATING, AND REQUIRED TESTS AND INSPECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, BACKFILL EXCAVATIONSANDTRENCHES\\'ITH CLEAN SOIL, FREE FROM RUBBISH.

B. aA.CKFILl FOR All TRENCHES, REGARDLESS OF THE TYPE OF ?t?E COVERED, SHALL BE COMPACTEOTOOO¾ DENSITY.

APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Daro·
Mohammad Sammak., City Engimx;r
R.C.E.. 37145 Exp 05-30-2-4

BENCHMARK

I SEEDETAILEDBLOCKABOVELEFT I
PART 5 - JOB COMPLETION

5.01 "AS-BUil T" IRRIGATION DRA''1\-1}k3S
PREPARE AN •AS-BUILr DRAV'IING ON A BLUEUNE PRINTV'.'HICH SHALL SHO'N DEVIATIONS FROM THE BID DOCUMENTS MADEOURiNG CONSTRUCTION AFFECTING THE MAIN LINE PIPE, CONTROLLER LOCATIONS, VALVES AND SPRINl<l.ER HEADS. THE DRA'MNGS SHAU BE OEUVERED TO Oh'NER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE ANAL ACCEPTANCE OF !/.'ORK. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAI.L KEEP REDLINES AS-SUIL TS UP TO DATE IN A

DAILY BASIS,

5.02 GUARANTEE A.ALL WORK SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE OFACCEPTANCEAGAINST All DEFECTS IN MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND WORKMANSHIP. GUARANTEE SHALL ALSO COVER REPAIR OF DAMAGE TO ANY PART Of THE PREMISES, RESULTING FROM LEAKS OR OTHER DEFECTS IN IAATERlAL, EO'JIPMENT, AND 'M:iRKMANSHIP TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.

B. REPAIRS, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE DONE PROMPTLY UPON N01lFICATlON BY CM'NER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE AT NO ADomow.L COST.

C. MAINTENANCE DATA: SUBMIT MAINTENANCE DATA AND PARTS LISTS FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM MATERIALSM~D PRODUCTS. INCLUDE THESE DATA, PRODUCT DATA, SHOP DRAV-..NGS AND RECORD DRAV.,NGS IN MAJNTENANCE MANUAL.

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH ENGll'EERING DEPARTMENT i OOAWlt-.G NO. L-5 IRRIGATION SPEClFlCA.TIONS FOR"
255,261, & 265 PACIFIC AVENUE

BLUFF REVEGETATION
ISBGRI S1-EET 8 OF 8
Universal Engineering Sciences (UES)
1441 Montiel Road, Suite 115
Escondido, CA 92026
p. 760.746.4955 | TeamUES.com
Environmental Consulting | Geotechnical Engineering | Materials Testing & Inspections Occupational Health & Safety | Building Sciences & Code Compliance | Virtual Design Consulting March 7, 2024 UES Job No. 4830.2400020
City of Solana Beach
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, California 92075
Attention: Ms. Corey Andrews
(858) 720-2434
[email protected]
Subject: Application Submittal Geotechnical Review
255 – 265 Pacific Avenue (Alamo)
Solana Beach, California
References: At End of Document
Ms. Andrews:

As requested, Universal Engineering Sciences (UES) has reviewed the provided submittal application documents referenced at the end of this letter. The purpose of our review was to assess whether the proposed project is in substantial compliance with the City of Solana Beach’s (City) Local Coastal Plan (LCP) policies.

The proposed construction consists of repairs to deep erosional gullies formed within an existing permitted upper bluff retention device (i.e., geogrid reinforced upper slope), and no repairs or alterations to the lower bluff seawall are proposed. The proposed repairs are described as infilling, with geogrid reinforcement, of deep erosional gullies that have formed over time. The proposed repairs appear to restore the upper bluff to its previously permitted condition.

Based on UES’s review, the proposed upper bluff repairs described herein appear to substantially conform to the City’s referenced Local Coastal Plan (LCP). Specifically, the proposed upper bluff repairs appear to be in substantial conformance with LCP Policy 4.54, which states that “Any bluff retention device shall be reasonably maintained and repaired by the bluff property owner on an as-need basis…”.

UES’s review is based on the referenced and provided submittal documents. If the proposed improvements or referenced documents are revised or updated, or new documents are provided, they should be provided to UES for additional review and comment, as warranted. 255-265 Pacific Avenue (Alamo)/Application Submittal Geotechnical Review 4830.2400020, March 7, 2024

1441 Montiel Road, Suite 115, Escondido, CA 92026
p. 760.746.4955 | TeamUES.com
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,

UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES (UES)

Colm J. Kenny, GE #3201
Senior Engineer
C.
255-265 Pacific Avenue (Alamo)/Application Submittal Geotechnical Review 4830.2400020, March 7, 2024

1441 Montiel Road, Suite 115, Escondido, CA 92026
p. 760.746.4955 | TeamUES.com
REVIEWED DOCUMENTS:

Grading Plans
255, 261 & 265 Pacific Avenue Bluff Revegetation
Solana Beach, California 92075
Prepared by Engeo, Dated November 16, 2023
Seawall Monitoring Report
California Coastal Commission; CDP No. 6-99-100 (249-11 Pacific Avenue and CDP No. 6-13-0437 249 Pacific Avenue Seawall Extension
Prepared by Engeo, Dated August 17, 2023
City of Solana Beach Local Coastal Plan
Adopted February 27th, 2013, As Amended November 2018
Solana Beach Resolution No. 98-101
Applicant Buzz and Diana Colton, Case 17-98-25
Dated November 9, 1998
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # B.3.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Alyssa Muto, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 22, 2024
ORIGINATING DEPT: Engineering Department
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: City Council Consideration of Resolution 2024-042 Adopting the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program (RTIP) for Fiscal Years 2025
through 2029
BACKGROUND:

The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is required by State and Federal laws to develop and adopt a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) every two years. The RTIP is a multi-year program of proposed major highway, arterial, transit, and bikeway projects including the TransNet Program of Projects. The current 2023 RTIP was adopted by the SANDAG Board on September 23, 2022, and covers the five-year fiscal period 2022/23 through 2026/27. The RTIP includes projects funded by the 2004 Proposition A (TransNet Extension). The 2023 RTIP can be downloaded at the following SANDAG website:
https://www.sandag.org/-/media/SANDAG/Documents/PDF/funding/funding-andprogramming/regional-transportation-improvement-program/final-2023-rtip-2022-11-

30.pdf
To meet the requirements of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, SANDAG will develop the 2025 RTIP covering the five-year period from FY 2024/25 through FY 2028/29. It is anticipated that the 2025 RTIP will be presented for adoption to the SANDAG Board in September 2024.

This item is before the City Council for the consideration of Resolution 2024-042 (Attachment 1) approving the five-year 2025 Regional Transportation Improvement Program for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 through FY 2028/29.

May 22, 2024
Regional Transportation Improvement Program FY 2025-2029

DISCUSSION:

The RTIP is a planning document that lists all major transportation improvement projects for the region. A transportation project generally has to be listed on the RTIP in order to be eligible for TransNet, State or Federal funding. The RTIP for San Diego County is prepared by SANDAG. SANDAG prepares a five-year program and updates this program every two years with input provided from local agencies in the county.

SANDAG requires local agencies to submit a separate project submittal form for each project that is to be included in the RTIP. The submittal of the projects to SANDAG must include evidence of formal action by the legislative body of the City, preferably by resolution. SANDAG also requires that the local agency hold a public hearing prior to adoption of the 2025 RTIP. After all public agencies in the region submit a resolution to SANDAG approving their portion of the RTIP, SANDAG will then adopt the 2025 RTIP for the entire region. It is anticipated that SANDAG will adopt the RTIP in September 2025.

The City has advertised a public hearing for May 22, 2024 to receive public input with regards to the 2025 RTIP. SANDAG recently provided a five-year forecast projecting that the City will receive the following amounts in TransNet revenues:

FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29
$244,000 $250,000 $257,000 $272,000 $286,000
The above amounts exclude debt service payments for the Highway 101 Westside Improvements.

For the 2025 RTIP, Attachment 2 lists five projects to be carried over from the 2023 RTIP:
1) Pavement Resurfacing, 2) Pavement Maintenance, 3) Sidewalks and associated street improvements, 4) Lomas Santa Fe Drive Improvements, and 5) Traffic Signal Upgrades.

Attachment 2 details the proposed funding program for the upcoming years for the carried over projects. While no new projects are proposed as part of the adoption, the City may add or modify projects through the quarterly amendment process.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Adoption of the RTIP is not a project under CEQA. Environmental review will be addressed prior to City Council approval to advertise construction bids for each project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adopting the RTIP will allow the City to receive TransNet funding. There is no fiscal impact currently.

May 22, 2024
Regional Transportation Improvement Program FY 2025-2029

WORK PLAN:

While the RTIP is not specifically included in the Work Plan, the projects programmed in the RTIP are included in the Work Plan.

OPTIONS:
• Adopt Staff recommendation.
• Deny Staff recommendation.
• Provide direction to Staff.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the Public Hearing: Open the public hearing, Report Council disclosures, Receive public testimony, and Close the public hearing.

2. Consider Adoption of Resolution 2024-042, approving the 2025 Regional Transportation Improvement Program for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024/25 through FY 2028/29.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Alyssa Muto, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution 2024-042

2. 2025 RTIP Projects List
RESOLUTION 2024-042

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2025

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2025 THROUGH 2029
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (TransNet Extension Ordinance), which has been amended from time to time in accordance with the applicable amendment requirements; and WHEREAS, the TransNet Extension Ordinance provides that SANDAG, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve on a biennial basis a multi-year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation projects eligible to use transportation sales tax (TransNet) funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach was provided with an estimate of annual TransNet local street improvement revenues for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2029; and WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach has held a noticed public meeting with an agenda item that clearly identified the proposed list of projects prior to approval of the projects by its authorized legislative body in accordance with Section 5(A) of the TransNet Extension Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy No. 31.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, does resolve as follows:

1. That the above recitations are true and correct.

2. That pursuant to Section 2(C)(1) of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of Solana Beach certifies that no more than 30 percent of its cumulative revenues shall be spent on local street and road maintenancerelated projects, or that its expenditures are consistent with the most recent TransNet Extension Ordinance requirements adopted by SANDAG.

3. That pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of Solana Beach certifies that all new projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by TransNet revenues shall accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, and that any exception to this requirement permitted under the Ordinance and proposed shall be clearly noticed as part of the City of Solana Beach’s public hearing process.

4. That pursuant to Section 8 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of Solana Beach certifies that the required minimum annual level of local discretionary funds to be expended for street and road purposes will be met throughout the 5-year period consistent with the most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG.

Resolution 2024-042
Regional Transportation Improvement Program FY 2025-2029

5. That pursuant to Section 9A of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of Solana Beach certifies that it will extract $3,623, plus all applicable annual increases, from the private sector for each newly constructed residential housing unit in that jurisdiction (unless exempted under the TransNet Extension Ordinance,) and shall contribute such exactions to the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP).

6. That pursuant to Section 13 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of Solana Beach certifies that it has established a separate Transportation Improvement Account for TransNet revenues with interest earned expended only for those purposes for which the funds were allocated.

7. That pursuant to Section 18 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of Solana Beach certifies that each project of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with TransNet project funding identification signs.

8. That the City of Solana Beach does hereby certify that all other applicable provisions of the TransNet Extension Ordinance and SANDAG Board Policy 31 have been met.

9. That the City of Solana Beach agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend SANDAG, the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof against all causes of action or claims related to City of Solana Beach’s TransNet funded projects.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of May 2024, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers –
NOES: Councilmembers –
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers –
ABSENT: Councilmembers –
______________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ _______________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk San Diego Region (in $000s)
2025 Regional Transportation Improvement Program
Table 1
MPO ID:

Project Title:

SB16
Solana Beach, City of
ADOPTION: 25-00
Project Description:

RAS (T2-11)
Various streets as determined by pavement management program. Street list to TransNet - LSI: CR be uploaded annually; RTCIP to be used on Lomas Santa Fe Dr - in Solana Beach, pavement overlays
Pavement Resurfacing
Change Notes:

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $2,539
PE RW CON TOTAL PRIOR 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 FUTURE TransNet - LSI $1,813 $573 $240 $250 $250 $250 $250 $1,813 TransNet - LSI Carry Over $569 $519 $50 $569
TransNet - TSI Carry Over $50 $50 $50
Local RTCIP $107 $47 $60 $107
TOTAL $2,539 $1,139 $300 $300 $250 $300 $250 $2,539
MPO ID:

Project Title:

SB18 ADOPTION: 25-00
Project Description:

TransNet - LSI: Maint
Street locations to be determined by city wide condition assessment; street list to be uploaded annually - slurry seals and localized pavement repairs Pavement Maintenance
Change Notes:

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Safety - Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation Est Total Cost: $280
PE RW CON TOTAL PRIOR 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 FUTURE TransNet - LSI Carry Over $280 $80 $100 $100 $280
TOTAL $280 $80 $100 $100 $280
MPO ID:

Project Title:

SB21 ADOPTION: 25-00
Project Description:

TransNet - LSI: CR
see map - In Solana Beach, planning, design and construction to add and improve sidewalks and pedestrian paths at the following locations: Santa Helena north of Sun Valley, and Glencrest Drive south of Dell Street. Associated curb, gutter and pavement restoration is included.

Sidewalks and associated street improvements at various locations Change Notes:

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $589
PE RW CON TOTAL PRIOR 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 FUTURE TransNet - LSI $222 $222 $222
TransNet - LSI Carry Over $367 $167 $100 $100 $55 $312
TOTAL $589 $389 $100 $100 $55 $534
** Include SANDAG in progress and pending projects - these projects are subject to change when accepted by SANDAG

San Diego Region (in $000s)
2025 Regional Transportation Improvement Program
Table 1
MPO ID:

Project Title:

SB22
Solana Beach, City of
ADOPTION: 25-00
Project Description: Lomas Santa Fe Drive from Santa Helena to HIghland Drive (.95 miles) - On Lomas Santa Fe Drive, east of I-5 between Santa Helena and Highland Drive, construct new curbs and a multi-use trail along the northerly side of the existing roadway. Construct planted medians. Reconfigure and restripe the existing travel lanes and bike lanes to accommodated the multi-use trail. Add sidewalk along the south side, east of Las BanderasOverlay the existing pavement with 2-inch asphalt concrete.Toll Credits will be used to match federal funds for the CON phase
Lomas Santa Fe Drive Roadway and Corridor Improvements
Change Notes:

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities Est Total Cost: $7,000
PE RW CON TOTAL PRIOR 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 FUTURE Federal Disc. - CPF - Hwy $7,000 $7,000 $7,000
TOTAL $7,000 $7,000 $7,000
MPO ID:

Project Title:

SB23 ADOPTION: 25-00
Project Description: Lomas Santa Fe Drive and Highway 101 - Traffic signal equipment replacements and upgrades on the Regional Arterial System
Traffic Signal Equipment Replacements and Upgrades
Change Notes:

Capacity Status: NCI Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects Est Total Cost: $181
PE RW CON TOTAL PRIOR 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 FUTURE Local RTCIP $181 $25 $36 $30 $30 $30 $30 $181
TOTAL $181 $25 $36 $30 $30 $30 $30 $181
** Include SANDAG in progress and pending projects - these projects are subject to change when accepted by SANDAG

RTIP Fund Types
Local Funding
RTCIP Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program TransNet-LSI Prop. A Extension Local Transportation Sales Tax - Local System Improvements TransNet-LSI Carry Over TransNet - LSI funds previously programmed but not requested/paid in year of allocation COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Alyssa Muto, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 22, 2024
ORIGINATING DEPT: Engineering Department
SUBJECT: Update on Potential Sidewalk Improvements Along Glencrest Drive from Lomas Santa Fe Drive to Dell Street BACKGROUND:

Construction of sidewalks along both sides of Glencrest Drive from Lomas Santa Fe Drive to Dell Street (Project) has been identified as a high priority project for consideration. This potential project is a priority as it is identified in the City’s Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategies (CATS) as well as the City’s Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs.

This item is before the City Council to provide an update on this potential project, and to receive feedback and direction for possible implementation.

DISCUSSION:

Glencrest Drive is a local street serving many residents not just for vehicular traffic but also for walking and biking. Historically, many residents expressed concerns about traffic speeds along Glencrest Drive. City Staff, in collaboration with and in response to concerns raised by residents, implemented traffic calming measures such as creative striping, installation of speed cushions, and placement of electronic speed limit signs to make the road safer and more user friendly for all modes of transportation. While these measures were relatively successful, residents, particularly parents of Skyline and Earl Warren school students, are still concerned about the lack of a separate sidewalk facility.

The subject segment of the road (Glencrest Drive, between Lomas Santa Fe Drive and Dell Street) is used by many local students and their parents as one of the primary paths of travel to and from Skyline and Earl Warren schools. It is important to note that, during the preparation of the City’s Safe Routes To School Program, many parents of students recommended sidewalks within the study area.

May 22, 2024
Update on Glencrest Sidewalk Project

Construction of a sidewalk will impact 20 homes along the study area, nine homes on the east side and 11 homes on the west side. In general, the homes along the east side of the study area are either at or slightly below the street grade. The homes on the west side are slightly or significantly above the street grade. Some homes have two driveways, similar to a horseshoe design, and all homes have private improvements encroaching well into the public right of way.

The existing improvements within the right of way consist of two 11-foot wide lanes, two 6-foot wide paved shoulders and many different types of private improvements beyond the edge of pavement within the 60 foot of right of way. The street fronts for some of the more recently remodeled properties are improved with City Standard 9-inch sloping curb and 10-foot-wide decomposed granite (DG) walking and parking surface. There are many variations of landscaping, hardscaping, and other types of private improvements in the parkway area on both sides. Parking is allowed on both sides of the road and most people park partially on the pavement and partially in the parkway area. As mentioned, pedestrian activities are relatively high in this segment of the road particularly during school time. Pedestrians move on and outside of the paved section of the road, often in between the parked cars depending on availability of space in the right of way.

Staff reached out to a few residents within the study area. Most residents were receptive to the idea of a sidewalk as long as their private improvements are maintained or minimally impacted. Many homeowners requested that the sidewalk to be installed on the opposite side of the road from their properties. Staff mentioned to those residents that were contacted that City Staff would develop plans for the improvements of the sidewalks and would reach out to them again.

The proposed project would construct a concrete curb and sidewalk on both sides of the study area. To avoid acquisition of additional right of way, to maintain the existing private improvements to the extent feasible, and to minimize the cost of construction, the proposed design would result in two 10.5 feet wide lanes and 5-foot-wide sidewalks on both sides. This design would result in 30 on-street parking stalls placed in strategic locations. The driveways would be extended towards the street to provide a better view of the traffic before entering the street. The sidewalks and curbs would meander from extended driveways to inset parking areas. The number of parking spaces for the proposed project is substantially the same as the existing parking spaces. The proposed project would maintain the locations of every existing driveway.

If the proposed project is conceptually acceptable to the City Council, the following tentative steps are recommended for the City Council’s consideration:
• Perform a more detailed analysis of the proposed design. Specific attention should be given to the profile of each driveway, walkway, and other existing improvements within the public right of way along each property frontage. • Conduct community workshop/engagement meeting(s).
• Meet with property owners individually, if requested. • Complete final Plans Specification, and Estimate (PS&E).

May 22, 2024
Update on Glencrest Sidewalk Project

• Advertise for bids.
• Award construction contract by the City Council.
• Start construction.

The proposed design is prepared by in-house City Staff and needs to be further analyzed before any future steps for the project. The objective of this Staff Report is to introduce the project, answer any questions and seek any feedback and recommendations the City Council may have.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The construction cost for this project will be prepared when the final design is prepared.

The preliminary construction cost is estimated between $300,000 to $400,000 depending on many factors such as timing of the construction, number and nature of driveway improvements to be removed and reconstructed. There is $75,000 allocated for this project in the FY24 CIP in which the full amount is still available.

WORK PLAN:

This project has been added to the draft 2024/25 Work Plan as Community Character Priorities, Item B.22.

OPTIONS:
• Receive report.
• Provide direction to Staff.

DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:

Receive this report and provide direction to Staff.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Department Recommendation.
_________________________
Alyssa Muto, City Manager