Cities Index.
Agenda, regular meeting, first session

Solana Beach City Council
May 21, 2025

Document
Agenda, regular meeting, first session
Meeting
May 21, 2025
Body
Solana Beach City Council
Pages
21
Original file
88.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.cityofsolanabeach.ca.gov. That file is the official record.

(j)
z
0 ~ 0)
0 ::) "'
C\J
CL
0 0
...J C/l_
<( N
0 0
<( "'
C\J
CL
s: a:
0 <(
~

EB PROJECT NORTH

REVISIONS
L3.1
5 - OF - 11
SHEETS
IRRIGATION PLAN UPPER DECK 3/32" = 1 '-0"

IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
SYMBOL
l'i,
SYM80t
"'c=c 825" '-11="
... -11 ... ½., ►. ~~,:

Cl 1:.,il r,:,,-,gc o•
,;.cmmcr,;.io'
Re~;;:;.ca Prc:1,:1,~~c Sa::lJk:w, '°'r'C'-'C!-"tcr
QI:,: Qilllh
IRRIGATION PLAN 1/8"= 1'-0"
....,"lM"'-<H'°"">rn;~CM..:,_,.,_-aoo.,.v,vn.,,fi.-
~M-""""r,m,,t~i;.,.,.at-~•
, ,,_..,..,r,_,..,.__:,:,,e~mttm"'-"'""'"'..,.""?""',._."'<><._-o,,._,..-,=....,,.,, • ..,....,'?OM .,,.._Wa.l'!'l'Q<,"'-<....,...,,..,,,......_.,,, .. -='<>-$,0::,"'°"',.,_,-,..-"""l'<W""'l'I'"""...-,.~~'°"'""' ' _..,.-,..,m,,z,,,a-,n __ ,,,:w,., .. ._.,.,,_.,._,,~~~ ~"'~"'~--·
,.,-..,_ ... r;.~
l "'<>'CU""""'~"""""-;s:""""""""'°'"A7a0'<
tl°'"A_"-"'_,......_...,,. __ $"'"~--._-,.,._,.,_,,,_,._,..,..,.......,__(>Qt '"°"""'"'~...,._-,..,_,,_,=.,run.,.,.""'"'~--

PROPOSED

SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENCE
• _.."""" ... .__(:CO<$!_~_ .... ,,,,.....,...,,,.,."""'."""™""'"""....., ___ ..,_ wc.,.~"""""-'or,-..::so-cu,.,,,.nAM>UM-.ffl,,,,,__,,.....,.,.,.,._~,,..x,,e .. .,...,_....._ =•""-............
____ _ ... _____ ~,,,~-.u-.,_,"'-'"''~""" ,.. __ :,re..,_,,,._ •t "'-<Mn<,,,....__.,..,,,,,o;.-,,,,.,.~r-....,,-~~_,-,,,.,~M--..-_npw_ll( ssa·os'sB··w
POOL
731 SF
z
::s 0)
9 0.. (\J
z (\J
[L
0 0
C/l_
~ ;:;:;
0 C\l CJ (\J
[L
a: a:
a: 0
w
u
z
w
0 Vl
w
er::: LU
> <( r--.
o::U 0
z 0 - rZi w I 0:,
5U Vl LU <( J:,
z - LU rn > co
<( 0:: N <( <( .:J
:r: ::!, Z <fl LU
<( r--. u 0 CO .....l O 0::: 'St O N <( --. '"st Ll1 0) 0..

REVISIONS
L3.2
9 Backf\ow~
prevention device (FEBCO 825YA) ~ Brass ball valve
Install the device per the local water ~ /1/ purveyor's standards and specificat10ns ~ Threaded gatvamzed mpple
~~ ~Galvarnzednmety
~ ;Ii~ degree (9 □-) elbow
Ga!vamzed mpple ~ ):-;J~,...._
,,- I "=</ V --; I' ~---"'~ I
I i C i I I ,' E ~ ~I' I I ~Galvanized union. I: c.:o if/_ : i 1. c..~I ~v-Wrap20mi!tape ; , C t.,..:......J.. twice around all , 4• thick concrete pad,,~ above finished ~lj n galvanized pipe undeJ grade. See backflow cage detail. ~ L__.,,,_. --->----------~J---i....____ finished grade and ·.,, I v1 1 through the concrete.I
co / Galvanized nipple.
rJ1 :~✓ ,,.,~Galvanized coupling.

Flow ~QI,..--,-1 ~1 -------'-L_~o ~ ~ IJ p ~~ ' I 1-AII assembly parts (threaded nipples. fittings, etc.) shall be galvanized or brass per local codes and requirements. ~I L-Sch. 80 PVC male
2- Galvanized nipple shall extend 12" past the edge of the concrete footing. adapter.

Concrete thrust
lfGEND
G) IRRIGATION CONTROLLER (HCC-lSOO-PL) PER PLAN
®~R~~Tb°it~?~~J:~E~~iOU!T.
lJ) ELECTRICAL SIJPPL Y CONDUIT· '-' COW./ECT TO PO\-'&:R SOURCE. J.SOX !NS!DE CONTROLLER 0 ADJACENT SURFACE TO MOUNT CONTROLLER f'ER PLAN
NOTES
lCON1lWLLER ACCEPTS 120 VOL TS AC OR 230 VOLTS AC (lNTERNAT!ONAL MODEL) 2 MOUNT CONTROLLER LCD SCREEN AT EYE LEVEL, CONTROLLER SHALL BE HARD-'l.'!REO TO GROUNDED 110 VAC PO.VER SOURCE
3 REFER TO THE HUNTER HCC INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR FURTHER

INSTRUCTIONS
3- Sch. 80 PVC male adapter shall be used in connection from galvanize to the mainline. 4- Backflow prevention device shall be located as close as possible to the landscape meter. blocks required on ® HUNTER RAIN-CLIK 0 IRRIGATION CLOCK backflowdevices2SI ~ 2 >------------------------ 1 >---------------------- andlarger. i-1 ----------------------~·-~-------------------------~~-----------------------; 5- Backflow prevention device shall be located in planting area unless approved by Owner's Representative. 6- See detail for backflow cage installation.
7- A!! backflow prevention devices shall have freeze blanket included upon installation. 8- All galvanized connections shall to be made using pipe thread sealant. All Sch. 80 PVC to galvanized connections to be made using teflon tapo. 0 3----------

BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE
3/4' = 1'-0"
NOTE INLET PIPE ENTERING METER LENGTH MUST BE A MIN OF 10 X PIPE DIA o[ff[ET PIPE LEAVING METER LENGTH MUST BE MIN OF 5 X PIPE DIA INLET AND OUTLET PIPE MUST BE STRAIGHT P!PE WITH NO FITTINGS OR TURNS UNTIL AFTER THESE SPECIFIED LENGTHS PIPE AND FITTINGS MAY BE SCH 80 PVC SOLVENT WELD. THREADED SCH 80 PVC OR BRASS, AS REQUIRED FOR PROJECT

DETAIL LEGEND
C\ 0,------------------- HUNTER HC100 1" FLOW METER
5)
HUNTER DBRY-6
1) Strip insulation. i"'
2) With wire ends even, insert wires into the
connector and tighten until secure.
3) Insert the wire connector into the tube until the
connector rests on the bottom.
4) Fold the wire into the channels.
5} Close the cap.
4 ----TO EXISTING
BACKFLOW.

MASTER CONTROL VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR ASSEMBLY
3/4' 1'-0"
I
:0-?-w,,.¢<"'".}Z!Oc".,,-,,,,,r-,,.;::e;n;¼½Cl-"SO'
WIRE BUNDLE JUNCTION BOX/ WIRE NUT DRY-CONNECTORS 8 f------------ 0 PIPE BENEATH PAVEMENT 0 ~~~l~ATION TRENCHING J ~·"' ".(;' 4' FLANGE ELBOW P.O.C.

SPECIFIED RECTANGULAR VAf.VE

BOXES WITH EXTENSIONS AS
NEEDED.
18"X18"X18" CONCRETE
SUPPORT BLOCK.
4' FLANGED ELL.
2'X4" FLANGED REDUCER.
2" GALVANIZED FLANGE X 1 PT
ADAPTER.

PVC SCH 80 2'X8" NIPPLE.

HUNTER 1'-ICV-G MASTER VALVE
WATER PROOF CONNECTORS.
2X24 PVC SCH 80 TOE PIPING.
2X6X16 CONCRETE WALL CAPS,
TWO PER BOX, ONE EACH SIDE.

FLOW METER AS SPECIFIED (2
WIRES TO CONTROLLER).
ii}) 2X12 PVC SCH 80 PIPING.
(14) 4• PVC MAIN UNE WITH 2'
~• REDUCING BUSHING.

WfTi--!
(7;'\ ~f---------

TRUE UNION BALL ISOLATION VALVE
LU
u
z
LU
0 V)
LU
0::: UJ
> <( r---
a: u 0
z O:::r: LU ""
co
5 u Vl UJ <( J:,
z >
- UJ M co
<( 0:: N
<( <( .:_;
I '.:2:Zu-,w <( r--- u
0 ro-'oO::::
-st Q N <( -, -.:t V)O'l 0...

E9

REVISIONS
L3.3
7 - OF - 11
SHEETS
i !ECHU'(EC'/MA:o,1u~crn,:;rn,;tm:kEtA!ERA~!fEET1 I ~·- ! ... 1
,-.. ~.,"-•:,,.,.,. ,..,,,,. .. ,,,,."I
'. I~ l~: 1::: ~~ :!;:; :~: :1: ::

I 11£1 .. 1.,, ~ "' ,.,!,•, "' "' mlm J
,, if(~;:rf ·m~r~~I
@ ~::~FIM AIR/VACUUM REUEFVALVE @ ~~~F!M LINE FLUSHING VALVE @ ~~~~F!M LATERAL TO DRIP CONNECTION

HUNTER DRIP CONTROL ZONE KIT
@(~:~-;~HF) W/ UNIONS
LI.J
u
z
LI.J
0 ,---
0 N
co
Planting Notes:

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH SHALL BE DONE PRIOR TO BIDDING.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS BEFORE PLANTING.

3. ALL WORK W!Ll BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GOVERNING AGENCIES.

4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES !N THE EXISTING CONDlT!ONS OR WITHIN THE PLANS PR!OR TO BEGINNING WORK.

5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL SITE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY REPAIRS MADE NECESSARY THROUGH THE ACTIONS OR NEGLIGENCE OF HIS CREVI.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR INSPECTION Al FOLLOWING TIMES UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED.
•IRRIGATION COVERAGE. PRIOR TO PLANT PLACEMENT;
-PLANT APPROVAL AND SPOTTING PRIOR TO PLANTING;
-PRE-MAINTINANCE APPROVAL:
-POST-MAINTENANCE APPROVAl/ FINAL APPROVAL
B. THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL BE 60 CALENDAR DAYS AND SHALL INCLUDE THE SCOPE OF WORK AS DEFINED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. IT SHALL COMMENCE UPON WRITTEN NOTICE BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, WHEN ALL lRRJGAT!ON ANO LANDSCAPE IS 100% COMPLETE.

9. CONTRACTOR !S RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING All AREAS IN A WEED AND DEBRIS FREE CONDITION THROUGHOUT THE INSTAUATION AND MAINTENANCE PERIOD.

10. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE All FINISH GRADING PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY PLANT MATERIAL

11. PLANT SYMBOLS TAKE PRECEDENT OVER PLANT QUANTITIES SPECIFIED. WHERE SHRUB SYMBOLS ARE PURPOSE.

12. A SOILS MANAGEMENT REPORT WITH AGRONOMIC SOil TESTING RESULTS ANO RECOMMENDATIONS Will BE PREPARED FOLLOWING GRADING AND PRIOR TO PLANTING.

13. PERCOLATION TEST SHALL BE CONDUCTED AS FJELD/SOil CONDITIONS REQUIRE.

14. All ROCKS, DEBRIS ONE(1 ") AND LARGER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PLANTING AREAS AND FROM THE SITE.

15. PRIOR TO PLANTING, All IRRIGATION SYSTEMS BE FULLY OPEAATIONAl AND All PLANTING AREAS SHALL SE THOROUGHLY WATERED.

16. SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVE.R MASS QUANTITIES AND/OR SPACING ARE SHOWN ON PLANS. PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH TRIANGULAR SPACING.

17. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GROWN UNDER CLIMATIC CONDITIONS SIMILAR TO THOSE OF THE PROJECT SITE.

18. PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE REJECTED AT ANY T!ME SY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATM DUE TO CONDITION, FORM OR

DAMAGE BEFORE OR AFTER PLANTING

19. AT COMPLETION OF MAINTENANCE PERIOD, APPLY TRI-C COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER (6-2-4) AT 9LSS/1000SF AND WATER 1MM£D!ATELY WITH A THROUGH CYCLE.

20. SOIL AMENDMENTS: ACTUAL TYPES AND QUANTITIES WILL SE BASED ON SOIL ANALYSIS PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER ROUGH GRADING. SOIL SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN FROM ENOUGH LOCATIONS ON THE SITE TO REPRESENT AND ADEQUATE CROSS SECTION OF CONDITIONS. ANALYSES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED SOIL LAB. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOWING TESTING PROCEDURES AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH.TEST SHALL INCLUDE. BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SOIL FERTILITY, AGRICULTURAL SUITAB!lln', LEACHING, AND MAINTENANCE FERTILIZATION (IF APPLICABLE}.

CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE W!TH A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS AND RECEIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL FOR AM.ENDMENTS PREPARATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

SHRUB AREAS
PLANTING AND BACKFILL MIX FOR PLANT PITS SHALL BE A5 FOLLOWS PER CUBIC YARD. 100% OF NATIVE SOil
2" TOP PRESSING OF NITROHUMUS OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
8 LBS OF TRI-C 6•2-4
2 LBS FERROUS SULFATE THOROUGHLY BLEND AT THE ABOVE AT A CENTRAL ON-SITE LOCATION PRIOR TO USE.

THE FERROUS SULFATE SHOULD NOT CONTACT PAVING SURFACES AS STAINING WILL RESULT. 100 LBS OF GYPSUM
SOIL PREP SHALL INCLUDE,. AT A MINIMUM, FOUR (4} CUBIC YARDS OF COMPOST/1000 SF. INCORPORATED TO A DEPTH OF SIX (6) INCHES INTO THE SOIL

21. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY UPON THE AWARD OF THE CONTRACT, ORDER. LOCATE AND PURCHASE (OR HAVE HELD) ALL PLANT MATERIAL REQUIRED BY THESE PLANS.

I PLANT SCHEDULE LOWER PLANTING
~ COO€ BOTANICAL NAME CONTAH<ER 91". REMARKS ~ MATURE HEIGHT I ;;,,:•&,,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QlY ~ ~ MATURE HEIGHT

22. PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE FINISHED GRADES SMOOTHED TO ELIMINATE PUDDLING OR STANDING WATER. CONTRACTOR ,---------------------------------------------'----'---------'--------• SHALL MAINTAIN A MlN!MUM OF 2% DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND PAVING INTO DRAINAGE STRUCTURES OR TO STREET. (SEE ENGINEER'S GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS). CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY Q\\INER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY CONFLICTS IN MAJNTAINING DRAINAGE.

23. SEE ENGINEER'S PLAN FOR LAYOUT OF All CURBS, WAU5, RETAINING WALLS, UTILITIES, SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE. SEE ARCHiTECTS PLAN FOR LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS.
24 All PLANTING SHALL BE GUARANTEED THROUGHOUT THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD AND GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOV OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE MA1NTENANCE PERIOD.

25. All SHRUB BEDS SHALL HAVE A 3 INCH THICK MULCH LAVER. "MULCW SHALL BE "SHREDDED FIR BARK" FROM GREAT SOil UC. MULCH SHALL BE FREE OF STICKS, STONES, CLAY. TRASH. OR OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SAMPLE TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

26. AU PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS SET BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMAN.

27. TREE STAKES ARE NOT TO COME INTO CONTACT OF THE TREES, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE WINDWARD SIDE. 28 DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF ANY WORK. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER WHICH WJLL AVOID POSSIBLE DAMAGE TO UTILITIES. HAND EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED. I i
' I
WEST PLANTING 1/8" = 1'-0"
IC/)
""
z
"'
w 0,
ss
z gJ
::s~
CL •
CJ 9
z gJ _o..

I- a: zO
::s
CL
LJ.J
u
z
LJ.J
0 LI)
LJ.J
0::::
z
LJ.J
LI)
z
<(
I
0 --.

N2
~o
0 u
":i
·:,
N @;
~z
N:;;
·:r:
~ lo::,
00 S; .. 2
a.. w

REVISIONS
L4.0
9 ·OF· 11
SHEETS
PLANTING PLAN UPPER DECK 3/32" = 1 '-0"
• PLANT SCHEDULE SECOND LEVLE
! SYMBOL CODE ,--- --
)PALM TREES
~if"',.~
If •"1 ZAMFUR
...,,""lt<'{'<
!SHRUBS

BOTANICAL NAME
Zamia furfuracea
~ ALO RUB A!oe rubrov1olacea
~
!,"_:_) ATH MIN Athynum fihx•femma 'Minut1ss1murn'
CAR PAN Carex pansa
PITW14 P1ttosporum tob:ra Wheeler's Dwart

COMMON NAME
Cardboard Palm 15 gal
Arabian Aloe 5 gal
Dwarf Lady Fern ; gal
Meadow Sedge ; gal
Wheeler's Dwarf Prttosporum 5 gal
ROS HUN Rosmarinus officinahs µrlunt!ngton Garpet' Huntmgton Carpet Rosemary 1 gal ROS TU2 Rosrr.annus ofhcma!ts 'Tuscan Slue' Tuscan Blue Rosemary 5 gal ; SYMBOL CODE

GROUND COVERS
;: < /,/ ;j OPHJA2

BOTANICAL NAME
Ophiopogon japorucus

COMMON NAME SIZE
Mondo Grass 4"

QTY REMARKS WATER USE MATURE HEIGHT
Moderate 18 ·6'ht
Low
Moderate 6 • 1810 ht
Moderate 6 • 18in ht
16 Moderate 18 • 36in ht
Low 6-181n ht
Low 6-6' ht

SPACING QTY REMARKS WATER USE MATURE HEIGHT
,e· o c 14 Moderate 6 • 1Bin ht

PROPOSED

SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENCE
EAST PLANTING 1/8" = 1'-0"
1--S----.................
. . ......... . . . . . . . . . . -, .. . •. • .. ·.·.·.·.·.·,,.·.·. ·.· I-
(/)
<( 0)
Wo
z gJ
::i ls
o..~
(9 9
z gJ - Cl. I- a: zo
::i

0..
4"1a.yerofmu!ch
Nomcrethll!l l'ol
muk:hontopo!
fOOtba.H{S«
specmca.t,ons to1
muk:h)
Ong,na.tslope should---
pazsthroughthe
po,ntwherethetrunk
mut::sutstra.te,so~
Netez
.--Round •tcpp«I SC1ilberm4'h1ghimd I!'
w'dell!.leverootba.ttsurace:hllllbe
Ctlltered en nu dOWl'lh:1I side ofme 100!
bllll!or240 BermshaUbl!Q•lllllrootba.11
penphery
1, Shrubs sha.ff be of q\.Wrty u pr1!1<entied ,n tne root obsuvations detail and tpecm::at10n 2·S1tt1speerl\cat,onstcrfurthertcqu,rements1elatedto1l'ltsdtta!l 4 SHRUB ON SLOPE 5% (20:1) TO 50% (2:1) - UNMODIFIED SOIL 9 STAKING DETAIL
tifR~T,l_~~tf f----- ,f-------:) ~~ttrlti~s. bET ROOT BALL CROWN 1};-• H!GHER THAN THE F!t.~SHED GRADE SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOT

BALL FOR POSITNE DRAINAGE
4* MIN GRAVEL

BACKFILL

PLANT PIT DETAIL
KEEP MULCH 8"-8' FROM THE BASE

OF THE TREE TRUNK

ROOT BARRIER TREE PLANTING
FX-PL-FX-TREE-12

SHRUB PLANTING
N.T.S FX-PL-FX-TREE-12
s=,ru
=~ I
A.½c,6"=·- ;
i
I
® 2 --------

SHRUB - MODIFIED SOIL
NT S
~--------ft=bXl
r-R_O_O_T_O_B_S_E_R_V_A_T_IO_N_S_D_ET_A_I_L_-_C_O_N_T_A_IN_E_R ______ 0 _"_··"'-.. -'"-"-."-i! 0-~--.l~_E_-_M_O_D_IF_I_E_D_S_O_I_L __________ _

PLANT PIT DETAIL
\ 1) V ! T 1W!ST BRACE- SECURE TO EACH
'---./ POLEV.'lTH1WO (2) GALVANIZED NAlLS
(2) 2' {50MMJ DtAMETER LODGE POLE PINE
'--,,/ TREESTAKE
0 FINISHED GRADE
(~ BACKFILL AS PER PLANTING OETAlL
®~~~~~!;;~YSTAKEBYTHEEND
~) :,,~~U~=~;~:E ROOT BALL \',TTH
~
(!J TREE AS SPECIFIED
® ~~:o:~ ~:~~R~~~::~AM)
FIN1SHED GRADE SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY
FROM ROOTBALL FOR posmvs. DRAINAGE
(0 ~~~:g~;~:~~-E(~E':lJ
MULCH W1TH A 3' {7CMM) THICK LAYER

OF SHREDDED BARK
@ ~:~~ ~~O~~E~ {150•200MM)
(11) 4· (100MM)HIGHWATERWELLAT
'-...../ SHRUB AREAS
@) PLANTTAB!.ETS AS NOTED OR SPECIFIED
@J BACKFILL M!X AS N01ED OR SPECIFIED
@NATI-.£ SOIL MIX F!RMlY COMPACTED
(i6) RECESS TURF AREA 1• {25MM1 TO
'-,,-'" ALLOW FOR MULCH
@ ~~~ WATER WELL AREA TO 3" {75MM)
NOTES
STAKE ALL TRESS 24• {OOOMMJ BOX
ANDSMALLER !NSTALLVIT
PRODUCTS MODEL TG•4 TRIM

GUARD ON ALL TREES PLANTED IN
TURF

REFER TO PLANTING DETAIL AND

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLAUT PIT
SIZE
INS1ALL 1\VOST BRACE PER

MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENOATlotiS
TREE PLANTING W/ V.LT. TWIST BRACE/ DOUBLE POLE

SECTION VIEW
PLAN
Notes
Mulch
1· See planllflg legend for groundcm,er species. size. and spae1ng d1mem:1on 2· Smal! roots 0~" or !ess) that grow around. up, or down tM root ball penphery am considered a normal cond1t1on 1n ccntamer production and ate acceptable however !hey should be ehmmated at the tmw ot plantmg Roots on tne periperhy can be removed at the time of planting {SEIB root ball shaving container detail) 3- Settle soil around root ball of each groundcover pnor to mu!ch1ng 0 GROUNDCOVER NTS
EB

REVISIONS
L4.2
11 ·OF· 11
SHEETS
Merkel & Associates, Inc.
5434 Ruffin Road, San Diego, CA 92123
Tel: 858/560‐5465  Fax: 858/560‐7779
October 22, 2021
M&A #21‐058‐01
Mrs. Kimeya and Mr. Todd Johansen
448 Marview Drive
Solana Beach, Ca 92075
Re: Initial ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive (APN 263‐182‐07) Dear Mrs. and Mr. Johansen:

The purpose of this letter is to provide a brief analysis of APN 263‐182‐07 to determine the presence or absence of Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) within or adjacent to the parcel boundary.   The proposed project includes new construction to replace an existing Single‐ Family Residence (SFR), swimming pool, and landscape located at 448 Marview Drive in the City of Solana Beach, California (Figure 1).

Previously, the 2013 adopted City of Solana Beach (City) Land Use Plan (LUP) identified the presence of potential ESHA within and adjacent to 448 Marview Drive.  Results from a more recent citywide ESHA update that Merkel & Associates (M&A) performed in 2018 determined that 448 Marview Drive included native habitat (southern maritime chaparral); however, the site was not designated as ESHA due its isolation, proximity to urban development, and surrounding non‐native vegetation (M&A, 2018).  This letter expands on this determination by examining the 448 Marview Drive parcel with greater site‐specific detail.

Methods
Prior to the initiation of the field survey, historical and currently available biological literature and data pertaining to the project area was reviewed.  This review included previous project site and project area biological studies and documents including the City of Solana Beach Land Use Plan ESHA Mapping Update Project (M&A 2018); as well as aerial photography from Microsoft (Bing 2020) and ESRI imagery basemaps: (Digital Globe 2021) and Google Earth Pro (2021); and sensitive species records from USFWS and CNDDB GIS databases (2021) for the project vicinity, where applicable.

A field survey was conducted on October 13, 2021 by M&A Senior Biologists Adam Behle and Gina Krantz.  Undeveloped areas of the parcel, including a 50‐foot wide habitat mapping buffer outside of the parcel boundary, were examined and photographed, noting dominant native and non‐native flora, topographic features, and land uses.  Onsite and surrounding habitats were mapped based on the observed flora.   Vegetation communities were identified and re‐mapped utilizing the most recent publicly available aerial photographs.
µ
Merkel & Associates, Inc.

M&A #21-058-01
Project Vicinity Map
448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach Figure 1
Source: USGS 7.5' Del Mar, CA Quadrangle 1:24000
Project Site
-------, I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I .1• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 3 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
Results
The existing residence of 448 Marview Drive is located along the top of a small canyon that is completely surrounded by urban development.  The residence overlooks the canyon to the east and south, which consists predominantly of non‐native vegetation, eroded sandstone, and pockets of disturbed native vegetation. The parcel is bordered to the north and west by single family residences and urban development.   A chain‐link fence separates the existing development and outdoor living space from all mapped native habitats.  All proposed development has been designed to occur within the limits of the existing chain‐link fence.

The 448 Marview Drive parcel includes three vegetation communities consisting of non‐native vegetation (NNV), southern maritime chaparral (SMC), and Diegan coastal sage scrub (DCSS), in addition to urban/developed lands (Figure 2).   Undeveloped areas within the parcel boundary typically consist of urban landscape (i.e., turf, ornamental shrubs and trees) in addition to a linear band of disturbed SMC that generally runs along the eastern parcel boundary.   Several small remnants of DCSS habitat were also observed, interspersed within the areas of NNV.

The enhanced, site‐specific mapping of the site based on the October 13, 2021 field survey resulted in an increased amount of NNV mapped on‐site, compared to the mapping and findings of the updated 2018 citywide ESHA analysis.   Discrepancies between the two mapping efforts are attributed to the lack of access to the privately owned central canyon area during the 2018 mapping update, and the reliance upon aerial imagery for mapping of the area.  Table 1 lists acreages for each vegetation community mapped onsite during the October field survey and proposed impact acreages.   Photographs of the existing conditions of site and surrounding lands are provided in Appendix 1.

Table 1.  Vegetation Communities
Habitat Type Onsite Acreage* Impacted Acreage
Habitat Group B** 0.33
Southern Maritime Chaparral (37C30)   none
Habitat Group C 0.08
Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub (32500)   none
Habitat Group F 0.75
Non‐Native Vegetation (11000) 0.71 none
Urban/Developed (12000) 1.46 N/A
Group F Subtotal 0.33
Total 1.87
*Acreage has been rounded to nearest hundredths for all habitats, and totals reflect overall rounding. **Habitat Groups refer to the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP) Habitat Classification System, with numerical codes from Holland (1986) and/or Oberbauer (2008).  Groups include disturbed habitat. µ
Merkel & Associates, Inc.

M&A #21-058-01
Biological Resources Map
448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach Figure 2
0 25 50 100
Feet
Vegetation Communities
disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub
disturbed southern maritime chaparral
non-native vegetation
urban/developed
Special Status Species
*# wart-stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus verrucosus)
Other
site plans (Alec Petros Studio)
topographic contours (Alec Petros Studio)
chain link fence
_ photo point
project site
50ft mapping buffer
Marview Drive
/V
/V
C] •
- I
I. -
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 5 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
Key species identified within disturbed southern maritime chaparral included chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), black sage (Salvia mellifera), toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), white sage (Salvia apiana), mission manzanita (Xylococcus bicolor), wart‐stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus verrucosus), and coast prickly‐pear (Opuntia littoralis).   The wart‐stemmed ceanothus was observed approximately 50 feet outside of the southeast parcel boundary and is listed as a moderately threatened rare plant in California by the California Native Plant Society.  This habitat has moderate biological value; however, encroachment by non‐native species found spreading from the surrounding residential development has resulted in degradation of the habitat.

Disturbed areas of Diegan coastal sage scrub habitat included species such as: California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), flat‐top buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia), black sage, and coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis).

The majority of this habitat is located offsite in lower elevations of the canyon situated south of 448 Marview Drive, and interfaces with dense non‐native vegetation that cascades from the backyards of residences located along the rim of the eroded canyon.

Dominant non‐native vegetation observed on site included iceplant (Carpobrotus edulis), jade (Crassula ovata), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), mission prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica), asparagus (Asparagus aethiopicus), pampas grass (Cortaderia selloana), elephant bush (Portulacaria afra), smilo grass (Stipa miliacea var. miliacea), and numerous other non‐native grasses.  Ornamental landscape plantings and other non‐native species from adjacent residences generally trail down the steeply eroded slopes to the canyon bottomlands located south of the 448 Marview Drive parcel boundary.

Surrounding land uses have also continued to degrade the remaining southern maritime chaparral and Diegan coastal sage scrub in the vicinity of 448 Marview Drive, particularly in the small canyon located south of the residence.  Residential development in this area has allowed for the continued spread of non‐native species via increased irrigation and maintenance activities, both of which have likely contributed to erosion and bluff failure in parts of the canyon.  Brush management and fuel modification activities have also decreased areas of native vegetation adjacent to residential development on the southern margin of the canyon.  These areas feature cleared vegetation, bare ground, and expansive plantings of iceplant and other ornamental landscape species.

ESHA Analysis
The Coastal Act and City LUP defines ESHA as: “Any area in which plant or animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which could be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments…”.  Additional clarification of ESHA is provided in the LUP, which provides specific exclusions for candidates of potential areas for ESHA.  Exclusions of otherwise appropriate areas of rare or valuable habitat are typically due to urban isolation or proximity to disturbed and developed lands.   The disturbed southern maritime chaparral and Diegan coastal sage scrub that occupies portions of the project site have moderate biological value; however, the diminutive size, habitat isolation, fragmentation, and continued degradation would largely exclude it from being ESHA on its own.

ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 6 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
No designated ESHA is located onsite or within the adjacent isolated canyon.   The closest designated ESHA to 448 Marview Drive that was mapped during the 2018 citywide ESHA update included a stretch of southern mixed chaparral, coastal sage chaparral scrub, and Diegan coastal sage scrub located approximately 1,162 feet north of 448 Marview Drive (Figure 3).   ESHA designated in this area has direct connectivity to the San Elijo Ecological Reserve located further north, and has high biological value due to its size, diversity, and adjacency to a state protected reserve.  Areas between the currently designated ESHA to the north and 448 Marview Drive consist exclusively of dense urban development and ornamental vegetation, restricting potential movement of native wildlife, seed, or plant propagules.

The isolation, surrounding land use, and encroachment of non‐native vegetation into the native habitats proximal to 448 Marview Drive has largely decreased its biological value in a greater regional context and thus would not be considered an ESHA.  The fragmentation of native habitats from urban development over time has resulted in the isolation of smaller pockets of native vegetation throughout the City.  These isolated areas of native habitat may be of greater biological value when in close proximity to other habitat providing “stepping stones” or wildlife corridors.

Independently, the onsite southern maritime chaparral and Diegan coastal sage scrub habitats are unique and of moderate quality and should continue to persist on their own as these habitats have adapted for the xeric drought conditions that the region has been experiencing over the last decade.  The City LUP requires the protection of native trees from impacts due to development and fuel modification activities, including toyon and mission manzanita that were identified on site.  If fuel modification activities are required in the future, the trimming of surrounding non‐native vegetation in the area would be preferred over the trimming or clearing of native species, in order to preserve the integrity of the native habitat.

Conclusion
The site‐specific field survey conducted on October 13 generally reflected the results from the citywide ESHA update that M&A performed in 2018, adding enhanced habitat mapping precision, refinement, and analysis to the original study.  Both studies were consistent in the determination of the presence of native habitats but concluded that those habitats within and adjacent to the site were not designated as ESHA due their isolation, fragmentation, proximity to urban development, and continued degradation from surrounding non‐native vegetation.

The currently proposed renovation project at 448 Marview Drive will not result in any impacts to ESHA or native habitat (i.e., southern maritime chaparral, Diegan coastal sage scrub habitat).  The proposed development of a SFR and landscape within the existing development footprint consists of the same residential use and activities as the current conditions; therefore, the existing buffers that separate native habitats from development will remain unchanged.   The existing chain‐link fencing that separates the proposed development from native habitats will continue to provide protection to sensitive habitats during construction; therefore, no further installation of construction fencing or demarcation of native habitats is recommended.  Additionally, it is expected that the steep topography where the onsite and adjacent native habitat occurs may preclude pedestrian access and limit other potential construction temporary impacts to wildlife such as noise and light intrusion.

I-5 SB
I-5 NB

N RIOS AVE

LOMAS SANTA FE DR
N HIGHWAY 101

PACIFIC AVE

N ACACIA AVE

N GRANADOS AVE

CANYON DR

E CLIFF ST

DELL ST

N CEDROS AVE
ALLEY

GLENMONT DR

SANTA HELENA

GLENCREST DR

SEABRIGHT LN

SANTA ROSITA

N SIERRA AVE

STEVENS AVE

SANTA FLORENCIA

SANTA ALICIA

SOLANA HILLS DR

SANTA ESTELLA

SAN ANDRES DR

S NARDO AVE

SANTA DOMINGA

SANTA CECELIA
I-5 SB OFF RAMP

FORD AVE

SANTA VICTORIA

SANTA BARTOLA

HILL ST

OCEAN ST

BARBARA AVE

MAR V SI TA DR

HOLMWOOD LN

PRIVATE RD

PATTY HILL DR

SAN RODOLFO DR
I-5 SB ON RAMP

VIA MIL CUMBRES

MARVIEW DR

W CLIFF ST

HELIX AVE

PRIVATE DRWY

SANTA QUETA

EL VIENTO
I-5 NB ON RAMP

CLARK ST

E CIRCLE DR

MIDORI CT

PLAZA ST

SOLANA DR

MARVIEW LN

DELL CT

LAS BANDERAS DR

SANTA HELENA PARK CT

SOLANA GLEN CT

SANTA CARINA

W CIRCLE DR

LYNWOOD AVE

SOLANA VISTA DR

SAN PATRICIO DR

SANTA OLIVIA

S RIOS AVE

GIBSON PT

EL SUENO

CANYON PL

GLENCREST PL

ESTRELLA ST

SOLANA HILLS CT

PUNTA BAJA DR

BROOKDALE PL

HILMEN PL

SANTA REGINA

CERRO LARGO DR

DRIFTWOOD LN

LA BARRANCA DR

RIOS CT

RIDGELINE PL

RAWL PL

VIA CHICA CT
ALLEY

PRIVATE DRWY

BARBARA AVE BARBARA AVE

PRIVATE RD

MARVIEW DR

PRIVATE DRWY
µ
Merkel & Associates, Inc.

M&A #21-058-01
Figure 3
Regional Setting Map
448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach
§¨¦I-5
£¤101

LOMAS SANTA FE DR
Vegetation Communities
Habitat
beach
open water
southern coastal salt marsh
southern willow scrub
mule fat scrub
southern coastal bluff scrub - disturbed
Diegan coastal sage scrub
disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub
coastal sage-chaparral scrub
southern maritime chaparral
southern mixed chaparral
non-native grassland
non-native vegetation
eucalyptus woodland
disturbed habitat
urban/developed
Other
environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA)
potential ESHA
448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach
Solana Beach boundary
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Project Site
Nearest designated ESHA 0.22 miles
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 8 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
Vegetation management policies contained in the City LUP provide additional measures of protection for onsite native species; therefore, no further protection or buffering is recommended for this non‐designated ESHA area.

If you have any questions regarding this analysis or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact M&A biologist, Adam Behle (Project Manager), at [email protected] or (858) 560‐5465.

Sincerely,
Adam H. Behle
Senior Biologist
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 9 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
References
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). 2021.  January 2021.  State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California.   California Department of Fish and Wildlife.   Sacramento, CA.   Available from:

State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Conservation Biology Institute.  2003.  Volume III, MHCP Biological Monitoring and Management Plan.

Administered by SANDAG for the Cities of Carlsbad, Encinitas, Escondido, Oceanside, San Marcos, Solana Beach, and Vista.  Prepared for the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program. 6 Sections + appendices.

City of Solana Beach.  2013 Amended 2014.  City of Solana Beach Local Coastal Plan.  9 Sections + appendices.

Digital Globe. 2021.  ESRI imagery basemaps.

Google Earth Pro™.  V 7.3.3.7699  [Software].  2021.  Available from: http://www.earth.google.com.

Accessed 2021.

Holland RF.  1986.  Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.

Nongame‐Heritage Program, State of California, Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife.  Sacramento, California.  157pp.

Merkel & Associates, Inc.  (M&A).  2018.  City of Solana Beach Land Use Plan ESHA Mapping Update Project.  Dated October 8, 2018.  Prepared for Summit Environmental Group, Inc.  17 pp.

Microsoft Corporation.  2021.  Bing Maps.  Available from:  https://www.bing.com/maps.

Oberbauer T, Kelly M, Buegge J.  2008, Revised 1996 and 2006.  Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County [Internet].  Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California”, Holland RF, PhD., 1986.  Available from:
http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/Veg_Comm_SDCounty_2008.pdf.

Rebman JP, Simpson MG.  2014.  Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County, 5th Edition [Internet].San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University. ISBN 0‐ 918969‐08‐5.  Available from:
http://www.sdnhm.org/files/9314/3897/4678/SDCoChecklist5ed2014.pdf U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (CFWO).  2019.  GIS Division Species Occurrence Data Download (zip) updated May 2019. http://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/giswebpage/giswebpage.htm
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
APPENDIX 1.  PHOTOS
Merkel & Associate
Photo Point 1. Phresidence and enc
es, Inc. #21‐058‐01
hoto facing west sh
closed yard. Photo
howing existing sin
o taken October 13
gle family
, 2021.

Photo
offsite
Initial ESHA
Point 2. Photo fac
e of 448 Marview D
A Analysis of 448 M
cing southwest tow
Drive parcel. Photo
Marview Drive (APN
ward small canyon
o taken October 13
N 263‐182‐07)
Photo Page 1
located
3, 2021.

Merkel & Associate
Photo Point 3. Phat non‐native vegPhoto taken Octo
es, Inc. #21‐058‐01
hoto facing southe
getation and eroded
ober 13, 2021.
ast near southern
d topography of of
boundary of parce
ffsite canyon.
el Photo mariti
the ea
Octob
Initial ESHA
Point 4. Photo fac
me chaparral habit
astern boundary of
er 13, 2021.

A Analysis of 448 M
cing northeast at n
tat located within
f the 448 Marview
Marview Drive (APN
narrow band of sou
non‐native vegetat
Drive parcel. Phot
N 263‐182‐07)
Photo Page 2
uthern
tion along
to taken
Merkel & Associate
Photo Point 5. Phparcel at non‐nat
eroded topograph
es, Inc. #21‐058‐01
hoto facing northw
ive vegetation (pre
hy. Photo taken O
west near southeas
edominantly missio
ctober 13, 2021.
t boundary of
on prickly‐pear) and
PhotomaritiMarvie
Initial ESHA
Point 6. Photo fac
me chaparral habit
ew Drive parcel. P
A Analysis of 448 M
cing southeast at n
tat located at the s
Photo taken Octobe
Marview Drive (APN
narrow band of sou
southeastern corne
er 13, 2021.

N 263‐182‐07)
Photo Page 3
uthern
er of the 448
600 B Street, Suite 2000, San Diego, CA 92101 ◼ p: 619.236.1778 ◼ f: 619.236.1179 ◼ www.WeAreHarris.com 448 MARVIEW DRIVE ESHA ASSESSMENT
To: Tiffany Wade, Assistant Planner
From: Emily Mastrelli, Harris & Associates
RE: Third-Party Review of the 448 Marview Drive ESHA Assessment Date: October 31, 2022
Harris & Associates (Harris) conducted a project site assessment and third-party review of the 448 Marview Drive (Assessor’s Parcel Number 263-182-07) Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area Assessment(ESHA Assessment) prepared by Merkel & Associates (October 2021). This letter provides a summary of the recommended pertinent revisions based on review of the ESHA Assessment and observations made during the site visit. Accompanying this letter is a copy of the ESHA Assessment as a PDF with commentsrecommending specific revisionsto the ESHA Assessment.

Project Site Assessment
Harris biologists conducted a brief site visit on October 27, 2022, to assist with third-party review of the ESHA Assessment. The purpose of the site visit was to assess the project site in comparison to the site conditions and results presented in the ESHA Assessment.

The identified and mapped vegetation communities documented in the ESHA Assessment appear to be accurate in terms of location and identification. Harris biologists were able to observe and positively identify the southern maritime chaparral, Diegan social sage scrub, non-native vegetation, and urban developed land previously mapped by Merkel & Associates. Therefore, based on the results of the site assessment conducted by Harris, no changes to the resource mapping are recommended.

ESHA Assessment
After comparing the ESHA Assessment to observed site conditions and reviewing the ESHA Assessment, Harris concurs with the original assessment that no ESHA is present on or adjacent to the site. The SanGIS SanBIOS database (SanGIS 2022) shows the nearest ESHA location less than 0.25 mile to the north.

General Comments
• The site is referred to as the “residence,” the “parcel,” and the “development.” Consider distinguishing each of these terms for clarity.

Results
• Paragraph 2, sentence 2: Recommend clarifying that the undeveloped areas (grass, ornamental shrubs, and trees) are included under the non-native vegetation.
• Paragraph 3, sentence 1: Recommend clarifying that the map shown on Figure 2 is the result of Merkel & Associates mapping efforts.
• Paragraph 6: Recommend adding a description of the landscaped grasses and other species in the undeveloped portion of the backyard.
• Figure 3: Rename the red line depicting the ESHA to “ESHA boundary.” = Harris & Associates
I
2 If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact Emily Mastrelli at [email protected] or(619) 510-5372.

Sincerely,
Emily Mastrelli (Senior Review) Kelsea Loescher (Author/Analyst) Principal Biologist Biologist
[email protected]
(619) 510-5372
References
SanGIS (San Diego Geographic Information Source). “San Diego Geographic Information Source.” Accessed October 2022. https://www.sangis.org/.

B I Harris & Associates
Merkel & Associates, Inc.
5434 Ruffin Road, San Diego, CA 92123
Tel: 858/560‐5465  Fax: 858/560‐7779
October 22, 2021
M&A #21‐058‐01
Mrs. Kimeya and Mr. Todd Johansen
448 Marview Drive
Solana Beach, Ca 92075
Re: Initial ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive (APN 263‐182‐07) Dear Mrs. and Mr. Johansen:

The purpose of this letter is to provide a brief analysis of APN 263‐182‐07 to determine the presence or absence of Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) within or adjacent to the parcel boundary.   The proposed project includes new construction to replace an existing Single‐ Family Residence (SFR), swimming pool, and landscape located at 448 Marview Drive in the City of Solana Beach, California (Figure 1).

Previously, the 2013 adopted City of Solana Beach (City) Land Use Plan (LUP) identified the presence of potential ESHA within and adjacent to 448 Marview Drive.  Results from a more recent citywide ESHA update that Merkel & Associates (M&A) performed in 2018 determined that 448 Marview Drive included native habitat (southern maritime chaparral); however, the site was not designated as ESHA due its isolation, proximity to urban development, and surrounding non‐native vegetation (M&A, 2018).  This letter expands on this determination by examining the 448 Marview Drive parcel with greater site‐specific detail.

Methods
Prior to the initiation of the field survey, historical and currently available biological literature and data pertaining to the project area was reviewed.  This review included previous project site and project area biological studies and documents including the City of Solana Beach Land Use Plan ESHA Mapping Update Project (M&A 2018); as well as aerial photography from Microsoft (Bing 2020) and ESRI imagery basemaps: (Digital Globe 2021) and Google Earth Pro (2021); and sensitive species records from USFWS and CNDDB GIS databases (2021) for the project vicinity, where applicable.

A field survey was conducted on October 13, 2021 by M&A Senior Biologists Adam Behle and Gina Krantz.  Undeveloped areas of the parcel, including a 50‐foot wide habitat mapping buffer outside of the parcel boundary, were examined and photographed, noting dominant native and non‐native flora, topographic features, and land uses.  Onsite and surrounding habitats were mapped based on the observed flora.   Vegetation communities were identified and re‐mapped utilizing the most recent publicly available aerial photographs.
µ
Merkel & Associates, Inc.

M&A #21-058-01
Project Vicinity Map
448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach Figure 1
Source: USGS 7.5' Del Mar, CA Quadrangle 1:24000
Project Site
-------, I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I .1• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 3 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
Results
The existing residence of 448 Marview Drive is located along the top of a small canyon that is completely surrounded by urban development.  The residence overlooks the canyon to the east and south, which consists predominantly of non‐native vegetation, eroded sandstone, and pockets of disturbed native vegetation. The parcel is bordered to the north and west by single family residences and urban development.   A chain‐link fence separates the existing development and outdoor living space from all mapped native habitats.  All proposed development has been designed to occur within the limits of the existing chain‐link fence.

The 448 Marview Drive parcel includes three vegetation communities consisting of non‐native vegetation (NNV), southern maritime chaparral (SMC), and Diegan coastal sage scrub (DCSS), in addition to urban/developed lands (Figure 2).   Undeveloped areas within the parcel boundary typically consist of urban landscape (i.e., turf, ornamental shrubs and trees) in addition to a linear band of disturbed SMC that generally runs along the eastern parcel boundary.   Several small remnants of DCSS habitat were also observed, interspersed within the areas of NNV.

The enhanced, site‐specific mapping of the site based on the October 13, 2021 field survey resulted in an increased amount of NNV mapped on‐site, compared to the mapping and findings of the updated 2018 citywide ESHA analysis.   Discrepancies between the two mapping efforts are attributed to the lack of access to the privately owned central canyon area during the 2018 mapping update, and the reliance upon aerial imagery for mapping of the area.  Table 1 lists acreages for each vegetation community mapped onsite during the October field survey and proposed impact acreages.   Photographs of the existing conditions of site and surrounding lands are provided in Appendix 1.

Table 1.  Vegetation Communities
Habitat Type Onsite Acreage* Impacted Acreage
Habitat Group B** 0.33
Southern Maritime Chaparral (37C30)   none
Habitat Group C 0.08
Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub (32500)   none
Habitat Group F 0.75
Non‐Native Vegetation (11000) 0.71 none
Urban/Developed (12000) 1.46 N/A
Group F Subtotal 0.33
Total 1.87
*Acreage has been rounded to nearest hundredths for all habitats, and totals reflect overall rounding. **Habitat Groups refer to the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP) Habitat Classification System, with numerical codes from Holland (1986) and/or Oberbauer (2008).  Groups include disturbed habitat. µ
Merkel & Associates, Inc.

M&A #21-058-01
Biological Resources Map
448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach Figure 2
0 25 50 100
Feet
Vegetation Communities
disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub
disturbed southern maritime chaparral
non-native vegetation
urban/developed
Special Status Species
*# wart-stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus verrucosus)
Other
site plans (Alec Petros Studio)
topographic contours (Alec Petros Studio)
chain link fence
_ photo point
project site
50ft mapping buffer
Marview Drive
/V
/V
C] •
- I
I. -
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 5 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
Key species identified within disturbed southern maritime chaparral included chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), black sage (Salvia mellifera), toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), white sage (Salvia apiana), mission manzanita (Xylococcus bicolor), wart‐stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus verrucosus), and coast prickly‐pear (Opuntia littoralis).   The wart‐stemmed ceanothus was observed approximately 50 feet outside of the southeast parcel boundary and is listed as a moderately threatened rare plant in California by the California Native Plant Society.  This habitat has moderate biological value; however, encroachment by non‐native species found spreading from the surrounding residential development has resulted in degradation of the habitat.

Disturbed areas of Diegan coastal sage scrub habitat included species such as: California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), laurel sumac (Malosma laurina), flat‐top buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia), black sage, and coyote brush (Baccharis pilularis).

The majority of this habitat is located offsite in lower elevations of the canyon situated south of 448 Marview Drive, and interfaces with dense non‐native vegetation that cascades from the backyards of residences located along the rim of the eroded canyon.

Dominant non‐native vegetation observed on site included iceplant (Carpobrotus edulis), jade (Crassula ovata), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), mission prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica), asparagus (Asparagus aethiopicus), pampas grass (Cortaderia selloana), elephant bush (Portulacaria afra), smilo grass (Stipa miliacea var. miliacea), and numerous other non‐native grasses.  Ornamental landscape plantings and other non‐native species from adjacent residences generally trail down the steeply eroded slopes to the canyon bottomlands located south of the 448 Marview Drive parcel boundary.

Surrounding land uses have also continued to degrade the remaining southern maritime chaparral and Diegan coastal sage scrub in the vicinity of 448 Marview Drive, particularly in the small canyon located south of the residence.  Residential development in this area has allowed for the continued spread of non‐native species via increased irrigation and maintenance activities, both of which have likely contributed to erosion and bluff failure in parts of the canyon.  Brush management and fuel modification activities have also decreased areas of native vegetation adjacent to residential development on the southern margin of the canyon.  These areas feature cleared vegetation, bare ground, and expansive plantings of iceplant and other ornamental landscape species.

ESHA Analysis
The Coastal Act and City LUP defines ESHA as: “Any area in which plant or animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which could be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments…”.  Additional clarification of ESHA is provided in the LUP, which provides specific exclusions for candidates of potential areas for ESHA.  Exclusions of otherwise appropriate areas of rare or valuable habitat are typically due to urban isolation or proximity to disturbed and developed lands.   The disturbed southern maritime chaparral and Diegan coastal sage scrub that occupies portions of the project site have moderate biological value; however, the diminutive size, habitat isolation, fragmentation, and continued degradation would largely exclude it from being ESHA on its own.

ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 6 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
No designated ESHA is located onsite or within the adjacent isolated canyon.   The closest designated ESHA to 448 Marview Drive that was mapped during the 2018 citywide ESHA update included a stretch of southern mixed chaparral, coastal sage chaparral scrub, and Diegan coastal sage scrub located approximately 1,162 feet north of 448 Marview Drive (Figure 3).   ESHA designated in this area has direct connectivity to the San Elijo Ecological Reserve located further north, and has high biological value due to its size, diversity, and adjacency to a state protected reserve.  Areas between the currently designated ESHA to the north and 448 Marview Drive consist exclusively of dense urban development and ornamental vegetation, restricting potential movement of native wildlife, seed, or plant propagules.

The isolation, surrounding land use, and encroachment of non‐native vegetation into the native habitats proximal to 448 Marview Drive has largely decreased its biological value in a greater regional context and thus would not be considered an ESHA.  The fragmentation of native habitats from urban development over time has resulted in the isolation of smaller pockets of native vegetation throughout the City.  These isolated areas of native habitat may be of greater biological value when in close proximity to other habitat providing “stepping stones” or wildlife corridors.

Independently, the onsite southern maritime chaparral and Diegan coastal sage scrub habitats are unique and of moderate quality and should continue to persist on their own as these habitats have adapted for the xeric drought conditions that the region has been experiencing over the last decade.  The City LUP requires the protection of native trees from impacts due to development and fuel modification activities, including toyon and mission manzanita that were identified on site.  If fuel modification activities are required in the future, the trimming of surrounding non‐native vegetation in the area would be preferred over the trimming or clearing of native species, in order to preserve the integrity of the native habitat.

Conclusion
The site‐specific field survey conducted on October 13 generally reflected the results from the citywide ESHA update that M&A performed in 2018, adding enhanced habitat mapping precision, refinement, and analysis to the original study.  Both studies were consistent in the determination of the presence of native habitats but concluded that those habitats within and adjacent to the site were not designated as ESHA due their isolation, fragmentation, proximity to urban development, and continued degradation from surrounding non‐native vegetation.

The currently proposed renovation project at 448 Marview Drive will not result in any impacts to ESHA or native habitat (i.e., southern maritime chaparral, Diegan coastal sage scrub habitat).  The proposed development of a SFR and landscape within the existing development footprint consists of the same residential use and activities as the current conditions; therefore, the existing buffers that separate native habitats from development will remain unchanged.   The existing chain‐link fencing that separates the proposed development from native habitats will continue to provide protection to sensitive habitats during construction; therefore, no further installation of construction fencing or demarcation of native habitats is recommended.  Additionally, it is expected that the steep topography where the onsite and adjacent native habitat occurs may preclude pedestrian access and limit other potential construction temporary impacts to wildlife such as noise and light intrusion.

I-5 SB
I-5 NB

N RIOS AVE

LOMAS SANTA FE DR
N HIGHWAY 101

PACIFIC AVE

N ACACIA AVE

N GRANADOS AVE

CANYON DR

E CLIFF ST

DELL ST

N CEDROS AVE
ALLEY

GLENMONT DR

SANTA HELENA

GLENCREST DR

SEABRIGHT LN

SANTA ROSITA

N SIERRA AVE

STEVENS AVE

SANTA FLORENCIA

SANTA ALICIA

SOLANA HILLS DR

SANTA ESTELLA

SAN ANDRES DR

S NARDO AVE

SANTA DOMINGA

SANTA CECELIA
I-5 SB OFF RAMP

FORD AVE

SANTA VICTORIA

SANTA BARTOLA

HILL ST

OCEAN ST

BARBARA AVE

MAR V SI TA DR

HOLMWOOD LN

PRIVATE RD

PATTY HILL DR

SAN RODOLFO DR
I-5 SB ON RAMP

VIA MIL CUMBRES

MARVIEW DR

W CLIFF ST

HELIX AVE

PRIVATE DRWY

SANTA QUETA

EL VIENTO
I-5 NB ON RAMP

CLARK ST

E CIRCLE DR

MIDORI CT

PLAZA ST

SOLANA DR

MARVIEW LN

DELL CT

LAS BANDERAS DR

SANTA HELENA PARK CT

SOLANA GLEN CT

SANTA CARINA

W CIRCLE DR

LYNWOOD AVE

SOLANA VISTA DR

SAN PATRICIO DR

SANTA OLIVIA

S RIOS AVE

GIBSON PT

EL SUENO

CANYON PL

GLENCREST PL

ESTRELLA ST

SOLANA HILLS CT

PUNTA BAJA DR

BROOKDALE PL

HILMEN PL

SANTA REGINA

CERRO LARGO DR

DRIFTWOOD LN

LA BARRANCA DR

RIOS CT

RIDGELINE PL

RAWL PL

VIA CHICA CT
ALLEY

PRIVATE DRWY

BARBARA AVE BARBARA AVE

PRIVATE RD

MARVIEW DR

PRIVATE DRWY
µ
Merkel & Associates, Inc.

M&A #21-058-01
Figure 3
Regional Setting Map
448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach
§¨¦I-5
£¤101

LOMAS SANTA FE DR
Vegetation Communities
Habitat
beach
open water
southern coastal salt marsh
southern willow scrub
mule fat scrub
southern coastal bluff scrub - disturbed
Diegan coastal sage scrub
disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub
coastal sage-chaparral scrub
southern maritime chaparral
southern mixed chaparral
non-native grassland
non-native vegetation
eucalyptus woodland
disturbed habitat
urban/developed
Other
environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA)
potential ESHA
448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach
Solana Beach boundary
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Project Site
Nearest designated ESHA 0.22 miles
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 8 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
Vegetation management policies contained in the City LUP provide additional measures of protection for onsite native species; therefore, no further protection or buffering is recommended for this non‐designated ESHA area.

If you have any questions regarding this analysis or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact M&A biologist, Adam Behle (Project Manager), at [email protected] or (858) 560‐5465.

Sincerely,
Adam H. Behle
Senior Biologist
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive   Page 9 of 9
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
References
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). 2021.  January 2021.  State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California.   California Department of Fish and Wildlife.   Sacramento, CA.   Available from:

State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Conservation Biology Institute.  2003.  Volume III, MHCP Biological Monitoring and Management Plan.

Administered by SANDAG for the Cities of Carlsbad, Encinitas, Escondido, Oceanside, San Marcos, Solana Beach, and Vista.  Prepared for the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program. 6 Sections + appendices.

City of Solana Beach.  2013 Amended 2014.  City of Solana Beach Local Coastal Plan.  9 Sections + appendices.

Digital Globe. 2021.  ESRI imagery basemaps.

Google Earth Pro™.  V 7.3.3.7699  [Software].  2021.  Available from: http://www.earth.google.com.

Accessed 2021.

Holland RF.  1986.  Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.

Nongame‐Heritage Program, State of California, Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife.  Sacramento, California.  157pp.

Merkel & Associates, Inc.  (M&A).  2018.  City of Solana Beach Land Use Plan ESHA Mapping Update Project.  Dated October 8, 2018.  Prepared for Summit Environmental Group, Inc.  17 pp.

Microsoft Corporation.  2021.  Bing Maps.  Available from:  https://www.bing.com/maps.

Oberbauer T, Kelly M, Buegge J.  2008, Revised 1996 and 2006.  Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County [Internet].  Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California”, Holland RF, PhD., 1986.  Available from:
http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/Veg_Comm_SDCounty_2008.pdf.

Rebman JP, Simpson MG.  2014.  Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County, 5th Edition [Internet].San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University. ISBN 0‐ 918969‐08‐5.  Available from:
http://www.sdnhm.org/files/9314/3897/4678/SDCoChecklist5ed2014.pdf U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (CFWO).  2019.  GIS Division Species Occurrence Data Download (zip) updated May 2019. http://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/giswebpage/giswebpage.htm
ESHA Analysis of 448 Marview Drive
Merkel & Associates, Inc. #20‐058‐01
APPENDIX 1.  PHOTOS
Merkel & Associate
Photo Point 1. Phresidence and enc
es, Inc. #21‐058‐01
hoto facing west sh
closed yard. Photo
howing existing sin
o taken October 13
gle family
, 2021.

Photo
offsite
Initial ESHA
Point 2. Photo fac
e of 448 Marview D
A Analysis of 448 M
cing southwest tow
Drive parcel. Photo
Marview Drive (APN
ward small canyon
o taken October 13
N 263‐182‐07)
Photo Page 1
located
3, 2021.

Merkel & Associate
Photo Point 3. Phat non‐native vegPhoto taken Octo
es, Inc. #21‐058‐01
hoto facing southe
getation and eroded
ober 13, 2021.
ast near southern
d topography of of
boundary of parce
ffsite canyon.
el Photo mariti
the ea
Octob
Initial ESHA
Point 4. Photo fac
me chaparral habit
astern boundary of
er 13, 2021.

A Analysis of 448 M
cing northeast at n
tat located within
f the 448 Marview
Marview Drive (APN
narrow band of sou
non‐native vegetat
Drive parcel. Phot
N 263‐182‐07)
Photo Page 2
uthern
tion along
to taken
Merkel & Associate
Photo Point 5. Phparcel at non‐nat
eroded topograph
es, Inc. #21‐058‐01
hoto facing northw
ive vegetation (pre
hy. Photo taken O
west near southeas
edominantly missio
ctober 13, 2021.
t boundary of
on prickly‐pear) and
PhotomaritiMarvie
Initial ESHA
Point 6. Photo fac
me chaparral habit
ew Drive parcel. P
A Analysis of 448 M
cing southeast at n
tat located at the s
Photo taken Octobe
Marview Drive (APN
narrow band of sou
southeastern corne
er 13, 2021.

N 263‐182‐07)
Photo Page 3
uthern
er of the 448

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
635 SOUTH HIGHWAY 101 • SOLANA BEACH• CALIFORNIA 92075 • {858) 720-2AOO • FAX (858) 756-1782 STORY POL.E HEIGHT CERTIFICATION
Date: MA1<C,t( ,31 zozs
Assessor's Parcel No.:

Site Address: ,
Owner's Name:
2v3-!BZ-o7
lf '-18 NARV/£w pg
This is to certify that on f €8RLJARy 2,ki\ Zoz.5 the story poles located ori the above referenced site were surveyed by the undersigned, and found to be in conformance with the attached story pole plot plan. In addition, the following measurements were found:
f-HGHF.sr POINT
Highest point C!fthe story poles: :# 5 3/Lf,UR'
Pre-existing grade: ( ON RooF) 295.'521
Finish~ grade elevation: 289.80
TAC £EST IDlNT
(M.S.L.)* ,3/4 l,{i, •. 1t- 5
(M.S.L.)* zPB. &k. c~ ~)
(M.S.L.)* ZP)9,Eo
Finished floor elevation: _ -____ (M.S.L.)_* ___ _
I
TOTAL MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 25.00
PLEASE NOTE: The story poles must show and include the total height must include roofing materials. At framing inspection, a ~ight Certification will be required which must be, in exact conformance with the maximum height shown on Story Pole Height Certification.

For additional information, please contact me at 7uo -Z 21./ • 7~ 53 (pho • (!!lt2t~
Seal of Registration:
*Mean Sea Level (MSL) - all measurements must utilize an established benchm . . ge over the course of the project. mp CTR '51\k~ tN MARVl~vL DR. £LE..')/. ;:: '2..8G,. 79 January 2019 Page 21 of 25
C-STORV POLES, INC.

Chris Collins PLS 8591 Johansen Residence
POB 230972 Encinitas, CA 92023 448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach (760) 2?-4-7653 [email protected] W.O. CSP 23-1692 2/11/2025 CC,RM Page 1 of 2
* "T" T-post, "B" Bucket, "R" Roof, "FS" Finished Surface SP# BASE ELEV PLAN ELEV C/F LENGTH DESCRIPTION *
1 289.86 300.70 F- 10.84 T ... 2 2.e9.19 302.50 F- 1?...71 (290.29 T@EVE)T 3* 298.91 312.70 F- 13.79 UPR R
298.91 302.50 F- 3.59 LWR
4 289.71 312.70 F- 22.99 O.R. B
5 298.52 314.G,Co F- 16.14 R
6 289.76 312.70 F- 22.95 O.R. T
7* 289.,73 312.70 F- 22.97 UPR T
289.73 307.30 F- 17.57 LWR
8* 289.66 307.30 F- 17.64 UPR T
289.66 305.00 F- 15.34 LWR
9 289.86 305.00 F- 15.14 T
10* 297.91 305.00 F- 7.09 UPR R
297.91 302.50 F- 4.59 LWR
11 293.29 302.50 F- 9.21 R
12 284.87 302.50 F- 17.63 B
13 289.41 305.00 F- 15.59 T
14* 299.33 312.70 F- 13.37 UPR R
299.33 302.50 F- 3.17 LWR
15* 289.64 312.70 F- 23.06 UPR T
289.64 305.90 F- 16.26 LWR
16* 289.82 312.70 F- 22.89 UPR O.R. T
289.82 305.90 F- 16.09 LWR
17 289.82 314.¼ F- 24.84- T
18** 290.28 312.70 F- 22.42 UPR O.R. T
- 290.28 305.90 F- 15.62 MID
290.28 305.00 F- 14.72 LWR
19 289.74 305.00 F- 15.26 T
20 298.16 305.00 F- 6.84 R
24"' 306.64 312.70 f- 6.06 UPR R

VERTICAL BENCHMARK
SS MANHOLE= 286.79
CSP 23-1692 2/11/2025 Page 2 of 2
C-STORY POLES, INC.

Chris Collins PLS 8591 Johansen Residence
POB 230972 Encinitas, CA 92023 448 Marview Drive, Solana Beach (760) 224-7653 [email protected] W.O. CSP 23-1692 2/11/2025 CC, RM Page 1 of 2
* "T" T-post, "B" Bucket, "R" Roof, "FS" Finished Surface 306.64 305.90 C- -0.74 LWR
25* 306.84 305.90 C- -0.94 UPR R
306.84 305.00 C- -1.84 LWR
26* 299.08 312.70 F- 13.63 UPR R
299.08 302.50 F - 3.43 LWR
27 298.36 302.50 F- 4.14 R
28 284.83 297.00 F - 12.17 B
29 284.37 297.00 F - 12.63 T
30 284.88 297.00 F - 12.12 B (5.4 OFFSET)
31 284.86 297.00 F - 12.14 B
32 289.74 307.30 F - 17.56 T
33 * 288.97 307.30 F- 18.33 UPR T
288.97 305.90 F - 16.93 LWR
34 289.62 305.90 F - 16.28 T
35* 300.92 305.90 F- 4.98 UPR R
300.92 305.00 F - 4.08 LWR
36 299.27 305.90 F - 6.63 UPR R
299.27 304.60 F - 5.33 LWR
37 289.67 305.90 F - 16.23 B

JOHANSEN RESIDENCE
443 MARVIEW DR., SOLANA BEACH
CSP 23-1692R
PAGE 1 OF 1
3 NOT TO SCALE
6 9
32 35
27 26 14 I
7 25
36 15 24
I
3 16
19 18
28 29
10 11
33 30 31
13 12
Attn: City Council Members c/o May 12, 2025
Tiffany Wade, Associate Planner, City of Solana Beach
635 South Highway 101
Solana Beach, CA 92075
RE: Johansen Residence, DRP22-021 / SDP22-019
448 Marview Drive
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Introduction
Dear Honorable Members of Solana Beach City Council,
I am writing to provide context and support for the revised DRP/SDP application for 448 Marview Drive. This updated proposal represents a second iteration of the design, significantly shaped by feedback received from neighbors during the public notice period for the original application. Although the initial design had undergone full review—including story pole installation and public notification—new concerns from neighbors emerged that led the homeowners to withdraw from the City Council hearing. Rather than proceed with a contentious design, they chose to return to the drawing board and develop a completely new plan that addresses those concerns directly.

This letter outlines the property context, project goals, original design intent, neighbor feedback, and the significant revisions made in response.

Property Context
The property is located at the top of a hill on Marview Drive and offers expansive views of the Pacific Ocean from a second level. It sits on a ~32,600 sq. ft. lot with a relatively flat, buildable pad surrounded by hillsides to the east and south. There are no environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA) onsite. Residences border the property to the north, south, and west, while the eastern edge opens to a sloped hillside. The neighborhood has seen redevelopment over the years that have enhanced ocean views for some while impairing views for others.

Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com ALEC PETROS STUD I 0
Project Goals
The homeowners, Kimeya and Todd—lifelong Solana Beach residents and Torrey Pines alumni—are raising their three children (ages 4 to 9) in a home that no longer meets their family's growing needs. Their goal was to design a residence that would:
● Reclaim ocean views to the West where possible and capture views to La Jolla to the South and hillsides to the East;
● Preserve outdoor yard space for landscape and room for kids to practice sports; ● Enhance indoor-outdoor living with covered, accessible outdoor spaces; ● Foster a sense of closeness with shared bedroom proximity and integrated home offices; ● Emphasize sustainable design using passive heating and cooling; ● Respect neighbors’ views and maintain architectural harmony with the neighborhood; ● Remain on the existing pad to preserve the surrounding hillsides; ● Incorporate timeless design features with long-term appeal.

Initial Design Overview
The initial concept featured a two-story, L-shaped home wrapping around a rear play yard. The building was deliberately set back from the street to allow for a generous front yard and landscaped buffer, creating a welcoming frontage and softening its presence from the street.

The ground floor contained communal living spaces that connected seamlessly to outdoor areas. The second floor held all bedrooms, prioritizing privacy, connection, and ocean views.

Covered decks on both ends were surrounded by landscaping to minimize visibility into neighboring yards while still offering views to the points of interest. A deep eave design enhanced passive climate control to reduce the home’s energy needs while maintaining a low-profile silhouette using a tapered roof edge.

The project was developed with great care, balancing aesthetics, functionality, neighborhood compatibility and environmental sensitivity. Below are the simplified plans depicting this design.

Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardif by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com I
I
I
I
I
i
J 1/
}
I
I
I
r
l
1-
IB
CJ
[
IIB
IB
CJ
/ CJ
CJ
CJ L_ JJ B
IB
CJ
□
llJ o:z
~::; I :>- le
u
1z ;;§ I 01--
crw
IJ.. (f)
D 0
□ /
/
(
I
I
LJl=- )
_;
------ --- ,,,,-- - /
/
L_soUTH ~
/

VIEWS /
□ _/"
~- ----- .-4~
;:?'/'
r ,?"
,?"
P'
7 SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE
----- - - -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- INITIAL DESIGN - LEVEL 1
UJ
>
1i:'.
0 s
UJ
> 0:::
<(
~
WEST
VIEWS
TO
OCEAN
I
I
I
I
- 7
1~ '
I
_/_
-L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

COVERED
DECK
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J

SOUTH ---VIEWS
------7 -- - I
I
I
I
------

SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE
- -----
INITIAL DESIG N - LEVEL 2
-
EAST
VIEWS
-
Initial Community Engagement
Before submitting the application, the homeowners personally met with the immediate neighbors at 434, 437, 445, 452 and 459 Marview Drive, presenting the plans and renderings for feedback.

Only one concern was raised by the resident at 452 Marview Drive—regarding potential gopher activity during construction—which was promptly addressed. Without any other pushback from surrounding neighbors, the homeowner decided to proceed forward with developing the required plans, reports and documents needed for the permit application. Below is a neighborhood map showing the subject property and neighbors that were contacted.

Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com I
I 437 I
)_ ___ /
I CD

I NORTH
Initial Submission & Story Pole Installation
Following DRP/SDP submission and story pole installation, neighbors at 452 and 445 Marview Drive expressed concerns about the project, which came as a surprise to us after our initial neighborhood outreach. Below outlines the concerns we understood from the neighbors; 452 Marview Drive:
● Concerned about the massing along the street.
● Privacy concerns from proposed second-floor views into their backyard ● Shading concerns regarding proposed second-floor along shared property line ● Noise concerns from mechanical / pool equipment placement 445 Marview Drive:
● Concerned about the massing along the street.
● Second-floor volume seemed too large
● Suggested relocating second-floor space to the first floor in the rear yard.

Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardif by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com Design Revisions
After extensive dialogue and consideration, it became clear that their neighbor’s concerns could not be addressed through minor design changes. As a result, the homeowners chose to entirely withdraw the original application—despite the significant investment of time, resources, and emotional energy—and begin anew with a design that treated their neighbors’ new concerns as core program requirements. Major changes included:
● Relocating the building mass toward the center of the lot, reducing the massing along the street and shared property line.
● Creating a front courtyard to open up the street-facing portion of the lot and soften massing, with new landscaping and tree screening for added privacy. ● Reducing the second floor area by more than 1,100 sq. ft., shifting that area to the ground floor in the rear yard to preserve functionality while addressing massing concerns.
● Setting back the remaining second-floor portion 21 feet from the original location, creating a ~50 foot distance from the front property line at its narrowest—farther than any other home on the street—significantly reducing its visual impact from the street. ● Aligning the second level with 452 Marview's structure to preserve their light and air on their front and back yards.
● Detaching the office space originally planned for the second story and relocating it to the backyard to further minimize the main structure’s bulk. ● Relocating mechanical and pool equipment away from the shared yard with 452 Marview to minimize noise.
● Reducing the main house area by approximately 350 sq. ft.

To help better visualize the proposed changes, below are several diagrams that represent the initial design and revised designs.

Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardif by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com 437 445 459
452
448

MARVIEW DRIVE

TOP OF SLOPE
LEVEL 1

COVERED
DECK

NEIGHBOR CONCERNS
- CONCERN ABOUT
MASSING ALONG STREET.

NEIGHBOR CONCERNS
- CONCERN ABOUT MASSING
ALONG STREET.
-NOISE CONCERNS FROM
MECH EQUIP.
445
434
437 459
452
448

MARVIEW DRIVE

DESIGN SOLUTIONS
- CREATED A FRONT COURTYARD TO
REDUCE MASSING AT STREET.

DESIGN SOLUTIONS
- DECREASED LEVEL 2

MASSING BY RELOCATING
BEDROOMS TO LEVEL 1.

DESIGN SOLUTIONS
-DETACHED OFFICE

SPACE TO REDUCE MAIN
HOUSE MASSING.

DESIGN SOLUTIONS
- RELOCATED BUILDING
MASSING TO CENTER OF LOT.

TOP OF SLOPE
LEVEL 1

REVISED DESIGN
INITIAL DESIGN : LEVEL 1 REVISED DESIGN : LEVEL 1
I
- - - - J
j
~ - - - - -1-- I.!:::::=~~
I
I -,---...L.------ ______ .J ----
- - - - ----.------
r----
l / 1~~
L.:;;;;=;;;;z;;;;;;:ii:;;;;;;;;a
I I I
--7
r;z::;;;;;;:~ 1 1
I I
11 1 I ~~~~~~ I I
I U
I I )~
i Ii \
I I I
I I I
11 1
I I
I I I
I I I
11 1
I I
\
\
\
\
\
(
I I
I I
~ : I
I I I
L __ I I
: I
I I
I I
I
0 I I
I
I I
l..!:::::=~=:J
- - ---L------
r------
11 1
I I
I I I
I I I
/ I /
I I
445
434
437 459
452
448

MARVIEW DRIVE

TOP OF SLOPE
LEVEL 2 COVERED
DECK

COVERED
DECK

NEIGHBOR CONCERNS
- CONCERN ABOUT MASSING
ALONG STREET.
-SECOND LEVEL FEELS TOO

LARGE, PREFER RELOCATING
SOME AREA TO LEVEL 1

NEIGHBOR CONCERNS
- PRIVACY CONCERNS
FROM LEVEL 2
-SHADE CONCERNS
FROM LEVEL 2
445
434
437 459
452
448

MARVIEW DRIVE

TOP OF SLOPE

DESIGN SOLUTIONS
- SETBACK BUILDING MASS TOWARD CENTER
OF LOT TO REDUCE MASSING AT STREET.
-REDUCED LEVEL 2 AREA.
-ALIGNED MASSING W/ 452 STRUCTURE.

LEVEL 2

DESIGN SOLUTIONS
-REMOVED LEVEL 2

MASSING ALONG
SHARED PROP LINE.
-REMOVED COVERED
DECK.

COVERED
DECK

REVISED DESIGN
INITIAL DESIGN : LEVEL 2 REVISED DESIGN : LEVEL 2
I I
// 0 1 1

I I I I
---J L I -----1-- --_J L --
1 I - • ___ .J.._ ___ _
_______ .J ----
---
l r---- -- 7 ,--
/ I I ,--,.1=====::=.i I
I I I I f
I I
11 1 I
L - - ~ ___._._. __ ~
I i I
I I t~
i Ii \
I I I \
I I I
11 1
I I
I I I
I I I
11 1
I I
\
I
\
\
(
I
'
I I
L __ _J
\_' " \_ __ ___ __ _,,,,,,
r--0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - - J
I I I
11 1
I I
I I I
I I I
11 1
I I
I I
0 I I
I
I I
L_
- - - - - - - __J L - -
- - ___ j__ ___ _
---
0 Rendering Comparison
Initial Design Rendering - Street View (Eye Level)
Revised Design Rendering - Street View (Eye Level)
Artistic renderings are used to convey design intent only and may not represent the exact nature of the final building or site.

Copyright © Alec Petros Studio
Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardif by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com Homeowner’s Concessions
The decision to completely reimagine the project was not made lightly. It required the homeowners to part with a design that had taken years to develop—one that reflected their values, their aspirations for family life, and their vision for a long-term home. The redesign demanded not only additional financial resources and time, but also a willingness to make significant compromises that directly impacted their quality of life, daily routines, and long-term goals. However, in the interest of preserving a positive relationship with their neighbors, they chose collaboration and compromise. While it’s challenging to quantify the vast amount of changes and associated concessions that occurred in the design transformation, below is a list of concessions that are readily apparent from a broader perspective:
● A reduction in usable yard space for children to play and practice sports; ● Lost and diminished views to the South and to the ocean due to massing adjustments from the second level;
● Reconfigured bedrooms—relocating all the children's rooms to the first level—has resulted in a reduced sense of security and connection among family members. This physical separation has caused unease for the children, presenting emotional and practical challenges for the parents to manage.
● Loss of family connection caused by detaching the office; ● Loss of usable interior space caused by a reduction in total building area; ● Loss in family gathering locations caused by the reduction in covered deck spaces. ● Emotional and Financial Loss associated with starting over.

Neighbor Response to Revised Design
After developing a preliminary revised design, the homeowners proactively reached out again to each of their immediate neighbors at 434, 437, 445, 452 and 459 Marview Drive to share the revised design and communicated specifically with homeowners at 452 and 445 Marview how the new design addressed their initial concerns.

Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardif by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com Upon reviewing the updated design, the resident at 452 Marview expressed appreciation for the efforts made to accommodate her feedback but requested to wait until story poles were installed before providing more support for the project. Once the poles were in place, a follow-up meeting was held to walk her through the updated design in person. The combination of the revised plans and the physical context provided by the story poles helped her fully grasp the extent of the changes. She expressed gratitude for the thoughtful adjustments and confirmed that her initial concerns had been resolved, stating she had no further objections to the project.

While the owners of 445 Marview acknowledged the scope of the revisions, they continued to request new changes. Given the personal nature of interactions between neighbors, the homeowners are concerned that motivations may extend beyond the project itself. In our view, the redesign represents an extensive gesture to address their concerns and demonstrates a fair compromise.

Second Submission & Story Pole Installation
The revised project was developed with careful research to ensure compatibility with neighborhood scale, massing, and precedent. The new design preserves existing views, substantially reduces bulk/massing, and responds thoughtfully to neighbor input. Following resubmission, story poles were reinstalled and no view assessment claims were filed. Support letters for the project were received by neighboring property owners, which can be found on the following pages.

Final Thoughts
We respectfully ask the City Council to consider the extraordinary steps taken to redesign this home with care, collaboration, and community sensitivity. This process reflects a sincere effort to create a residence that not only meets the evolving needs of a local family, but also demonstrates a deep commitment to neighborhood character and respectful development.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Alec Petros
Principal Architect
Alec Petros Studio Inc.

Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardif by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com Neighbor Support Letters
The following pages contain letters from neighbors who have expressed their support for our project. The accompanying map indicates the locations of the properties represented by these letters.

Alec Petros Studio, Inc. | PO Box 861 Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007 | www.alecpetros.com

SUBJECT PROPERTY
- NEIGHBOR PROVIDED SUPPORT LETTER
59 452
-- - -
448
445

SUBJECT I

PROPERTY I I
!!;!
ir =-
Ii a
3 s
UJ
h ' >
Q'. 34 <t
1-1 ~
I
f
r $= I 2
--I /J.

I
I
~ CD 15
~~ ~ I NORTH
Kevin and Raha Shaw
415 Marview Dr.

Solana Beach, CA 92075
To: Solana Beach City Council
Subject: Support for the Johansen Family Home Remodel
Dear Honorable Members of the Solana Beach City Council, We are writing in support of the Johansen family's proposed home construction project and to respectfully urge your approval of their design. As a nearby neighbor, we have had the opportunity to observe the Johansens' approach to this project and want to commend the thoughtful and collaborative process they have undertaken. From the very beginning, the Johansens have provided clear and open communication with their neighbors on our cul-de-sac about their plans. They proactively shared initial designs early in the process and made a sincere effort to invite honest feedback from neighbors.

They created opportunities to listen, understand, and respond to the concerns raised by those around them.

What followed was a model of neighborly cooperation. The Johansens engaged in meaningful conversations, welcomed constructive input, and took significant steps to revise their plans accordingly. Their current proposal reflects sweeping and meaningful changes—particularly in reducing the massing along the street—to address concerns voiced in the earlier stages by our neighbors.

The result is a thoughtful, well-designed residence that will be a positive contribution to the character of the neighborhood. The proposed home is compatible with surrounding development, including many recently remodeled homes on our street, and has been designed with care and consideration for its context and community.

We had heard that there was concern regarding the construction of a two-story home on the east side of Marview, and that it may impact the west-sided properties. We are home-owners on the west side of Marview, and our neighbors across the street to the east have large, two-story homes that do absolutely nothing to diminish the pleasant environment, our sunlight, etc. In fact, our experience has shown that these homes significantly decrease the freeway noise and improve the peace and tranquility for those of us on the west side!
The Johansens’ journey has been exactly the kind of collaborative, responsive planning process that should be encouraged in Solana Beach. I believe the Johansen family's home construction project deserves full support, and I respectfully ask the Council to approve their project.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Warm regards,
Kevin and Raha Shaw
415 Marview Dr.

Solana Beach, CA
Dear Solana Beach City Council Members,
Paul and I are neighbors of Todd, Kimeya and their three young children; living two doors down on the same side of the street. I wanted to share a few thoughts on their proposed home project they have been designing over the past few years.

What’s stood out most to me throughout this long process is how committed Todd and Kimeya have been to keeping communication open and gathering feedback at every step of the way. This doesn’t always happen with major renovations and it meant a lot to both of us that they invited us to have a voice.

I know their plans have been reshaped significantly from their original drawings, especially when it comes to the street-facing side and the second story. Being on the east side of the street as well, Paul and I know how desirable it is to have an ocean view from the second story and are excited that the Johansens will be maximizing their views in their new home. This hasn’t been an easy or quick process for them (close to a year of time lost when they started over with their design, I believe) to get it right. But the result is a home that feels well-suited to Marview Drive— scaled appropriately and just a beautiful design.

I’ve seen their new plans as well as the renderings and we believe this home will be a great addition to our street. The style is fresh but respectful of the area, and the overall scale — especially now — hits the right balance. I appreciate how much effort Todd and Kimeya have put into not just the design, but the process of being good neighbors.

Thanks for your time and consideration.

Warmly,
Samuel Cannon & Paul Stone
422 Marview Dr Solana Beach, Ca
92075
ATTN: Solana Beach City Council
City of Solana Beach
635 S. Highway 101
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Dear Council Members,
We are writing this letter to show our support to Todd and Kimeya Johansen as they work toward building their new home at 448 Marview Drive.

We’ve lived on Marview since 2017 and currently have a home under construction across from the Johansen family’s property on the west side of the street. Having recently gone through the permitting process ourselves, we know just how complex and emotionally draining it can be to be in their shoes and it was important for us to show our strong support for Todd and Kimeya as they embark upon this journey to building their forever home for their family. We know better than most that it’s not just about design — it’s about listening, adapting, and finding a way to move forward while trying to satisfy a wide range of opinions and concerns and it’s been a pleasure to watch Todd and Kimeya work through this process together.

We’ve watched them handle this endeavor with patience and a clear desire to do things in a way that suited surrounding neighbors despite having a difference of opinion. While we personally didn’t raise concerns about their design, we know that others on Marview did — and the Johansens took those concerns seriously. We’ve been following along on their project updates over the last 2-3 years since they began working on this effort and it blew us away that when they redesigned their home for a second time they started from scratch - both with the home itself and landscape design to really address the feedback they’d received. This was an incredibly costly path to take both financially and with their time. Where they could have charged forward with their original plans and created more tension among neighbors, they went back, reevaluated, and made dramatic changes. Their commitment to find compromise speaks volumes about their desire to be great residents of the Marview community.

In their path toward seeking compromise with surrounding neighbors, they have also managed to design a beautiful home. We’ve been fortunate enough to see their thoughtful plans and renderings and are so looking forward to having a gorgeous and tasteful home on the street.

Given the lengths to which Todd and Kimeya have gone to address neighbor concerns and the concessions they’ve made to reach this point, I hope the Council will recognize the good faith they’ve shown and support their project as enthusiastically as we do.

Sincerely,
Tom & Martha Bertolino
437 Marview Dr, Solana Beach, CA 92075
Becky Schmitt
434 Marview Dr
Solana Beach, CA 92075
ATTN: Solana Beach City Council
City of Solana Beach
635 S. Highway 101
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Dear Honorable Members of Solana Beach City Council,
I would like to express my full support for the Johansen’s effort in building a new home for their family.

As their direct neighbors we have appreciated their thoughtful and communicative approach throughout the planning process and believe the proposed designs would be a great improvement to our neighborhood.

We appreciated the way they have kept us informed and provided us with the opportunity to review their plans each step of the way. The Johansens and their architect, Alec Petros, walked me through their plans and patiently answered my questions at formal meetings. As important, they have shared information casually in the form of phone pictures and story pole discussions. I have enjoyed working with all of them, including watching the plans evolve to their current iteration.

One area of particular importance to us has been the potential impact on our very small backyard area.

With the height difference in our properties it would be easy for a bulky second story to loom over our backyard. Their decision to use second story decks, sliding screen panels and negative space, plus the position of the house at an angle along our shared lot line demonstrated sensitivity and care and helped avoid that becoming a concern. We appreciate that they have been proactive in designing for this and have made it easy for us to approve their plans.

We also acknowledge the Johansens have made substantial changes to the first design to accommodate our neighbors’ feedback, requiring significant added time and resources to address their concerns. We respect and appreciate the length they’ve gone to preserve relationships with our neighbors and harmony on our street.

Writing this email is a pleasure because their plans are so visually appealing from the street. We’ve lived in our home for over 30 years and I have seen a lot of construction on my morning walks both on our street and in the neighborhood. Although I recognize everyone's desire to maximize square footage, I have found the results to be tolerable, but somewhat fortress-like. The Johansens’ plans, with their use of a recessed second story with outdoor spaces, appear much less imposing and much more friendly and organic. I'm looking forward to seeing the final results.

Sincerely,
Becky Schmitt
To the Solana Beach City Council,
We live across the street from the Johansen family and are writing to express our full support for their proposed home project.

Throughout this process, Todd and Kimeya have been open, transparent, and proactive in sharing their plans to rebuild with the neighbors on our street. They didn’t just submit drawings and hope for the best — they made a genuine effort to connect with neighbors and invite feedback right from the beginning.

The Johansens have had a long road to get here, and it’s clear that the revised design reflects the feedback they received throughout the process. We have heard about multiple revisions they have made specifically to be sure the neighbors were considered as they designed their new home.

One of the major changes we know they made to accommodate the neighbors related to bedroom placement. As parents of young children ourselves, we understand how important it is for a young family to have all the bedrooms on the same level. While originally they had designed the home to accommodate their family needs, in response to concerns from surrounding neighbors, the Johansens made the difficult decision to reconfigure the layout and move their children’s bedrooms downstairs. Any parent of young children knows this was a significant concession that clearly prioritizes being good neighbors over personal convenience. Their willingness to delay, rework, and adjust their plans in order to be responsive to the community is a testament to their character and their commitment to this neighborhood.

Just as important, in our opinion, the architecture and overall vision are well-considered. It’s the kind of home that enhances the block and we are looking forward to having their project completed across the street.

We hope you’ll see what we see: this project has been approached with care, community spirit, and a sincere desire to contribute positively to Solana Beach.

Sincerely,
Nathan and Taylor Rose
459 Marview Drive
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Alyssa Muto, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025
ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance Department – Rachel Jacobs, Finance Director SUBJECT: Adopt (2nd Reading) of Ordinance 538 Relating to the Annual Sewer Service Charge per Equivalent Dwelling
Unit (EDU) for Fiscal Year 2026 through Fiscal Year 2030 BACKGROUND:

On May 7, 2025, the City Council introduced Ordinance 538. This ordinance is now before the City Council for the second reading and adoption to amend Section 14.08.060 of Chapter

14.08 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code increasing the annual Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) rate as shown below for Fiscal Year 2026 through Fiscal Year 2030:

DISCUSSION:

At the May 7, 2025 Council Meeting, the City Council held a public hearing to receive written protests in compliance with Article XIII D, section 6 (a) of the California Constitution in order to increase the annual Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) rate using variable rate increases shown above, the proposed rates for Fiscal Year 2026 through Fiscal Year 2030 are shown below:

Rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for Single Family Residential Home The City received seventeen (17) written protests and there was one (1) protest during the Public Hearing. The City had 9,564 notices mailed to the property owners subject to the annual sewer charges. 4,783 written protests, which represent a majority of the notices 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
% Rate inc 10% 10% 8% 7% 7%
Current FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030
I I $682.30 $750.54 $825.58 $891.64 $954.04 $1,020.84
May 21, 2025
FY 2026 through FY 2030 Annual Sewer Charges

Page 2 of 2 ends

mailed, would have been required in order to not adopt the proposed rate increase to the annual sewer charges.

Given there were insufficient protests not to adopt the proposed rate increase, the City Council introduced Ordinance 538 (Attachment 1) at the May 7, 2025 Council Meeting to amend Section 14.08.060 of Chapter 14.08 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code increasing the annual Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) rate by ten percent (10%) for FY 2026 and FY 2027, eight percent (8%) for FY 2028, and by seven percent (7%) for FY 2029 & FY 2030.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT: Not a project as defined in CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The adoption of Ordinance 538 will provide the necessary funding for the administration, maintenance, debt service and capital costs of the City’s Sanitation District, and the costs of the San Elijo JPA operations, including the wastewater treatment, laboratory services, ocean outfall, pump stations, capital projects and debt service. The rate increases will generate approximately $562,200 in additional revenues per year for FY 2026 through FY 2030.

WORK PLAN: N/A
OPTIONS:
 Approve Staff recommendation.
 Approve Staff recommendation with modifications and provide direction to Staff.  Do not adopt Ordinance No. 462 and do not increase sewer rates at this time.

CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Adopt Ordinance 538 related to the Sewer Service Charge for FY 2026 through 2030.
_________________________
Alyssa Muto, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Ordinance 538
ORDINANCE 538

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 14.08.060 OF CHAPTER

14.08 OF THE SOLANA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE

ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGE PER EQUIVALENT DWELLING
UNIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2030
WHEREAS, the City’s Capital Improvement Program Budget contains sanitary sewer projects which are important to maintain health and safety standards, and which are identified in the Council’s Work Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach hired Raftelis Financial Consultants to prepare a Sewer Rate and Revenue Update in order to recommend a proposed rate increase to provide sufficient funding for the Capital Improvement projects, and support the operations and the debt service requirements of the Solana Beach Sanitation District; and
WHEREAS, the rates support the administration, maintenance, debt service and capital costs of the Solana Beach Sanitation District; and WHEREAS, the rates also support the operations, maintenance, and Capital Improvement Program costs associated with the San Elijo JPA for the collection, transportation and treatment of sewage for the sanitary sewer system; and WHEREAS, the City Council has selected a gradual, reduced Capital Improvement Program contribution to the San Elijo JPA; and
WHEREAS, the City of Solana Beach has complied with the notice and majority protest provisions of section 6 (a) of Article XIII D of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on May 7, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did not receive a majority protest from the owners of the parcels that are affected by the proposed rate increases to the annual sewer charges.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby declares:

Ordinance 538
Increase in Annual Sewer Charges

Page 2 of 2 ends

Section 14.08.060 of Chapter 14.08 of the Solana Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the increase to the annual sewer service charge for each equivalent dwelling unit to the following for Fiscal Year 2026 through Fiscal Year 2030.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk of the City of Solana Beach shall cause this Ordinance to be published pursuant to the provisions of Government Code §36933.

INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach, California, on the 7th day of May 2025 and THEREAFTER ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Solana Beach held on the 21st day of May 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS –
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS –
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS –
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS –
____________________________
LESA HEEBNER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
______________________________ ____________________________ JOHANNA N. CANLAS, City Attorney ANGELA IVEY, City Clerk FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030
$750.54 $825.58 $891.64 $954.04 $1,020.84
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ AGENDA ITEM # C.1.

STAFF REPORT

CITY OF SOLANA BEACH
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Alyssa Muto, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager’s Department – Alyssa Muto, City Manager SUBJECT: City Council Revisions to Draft Fiscal Year 2025/26 Work Plan
BACKGROUND:

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 Work Plan is a guiding document that includes all of the City Council’s (Council) priority projects. On April 23, 2025, Council meeting, Council discussed the draft FY 2025/26 Work Plan, recommend changes, and accept public comment.

This item is before Council to consider the revisions to the draft FY 2025/26 Work Plan (Attachment 1) based on the feedback received from the Council and the community at the April 23, 2025 Council meeting. During this meeting, Staff is requesting Council to provide further direction on priorities overall and within each area of the Work Plan.

DISCUSSION:

At the Council meeting, members of Council recommended revisions to the draft Work Plan presented by Staff. The revised draft FY 2025/26 Work Plan (Attachment 1, track changes format) has been amended based on Council and public comments and is now being brought back for consideration and direction.

As mentioned at the meeting, this year’s Work Plan has been revised to more closely align with the City’s recently adopted Legislative Policy. The new categories that the priority items are placed into are Affordable Housing and Livable Communities; Transportation and Mobility; Environmental Sustainability and Energy; Youth, Senior and Community Well-Being; and General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility.

The five policy areas outlined in the Work Plan reflect Solana Beach's commitment to being proactive in its legislative advocacy, addressing immediate concerns, and planning for the future. The City will continue to advocate for legislation that strengthens local governance, secures resources for essential services, and fosters collaborative solutions with regional and state partners. Additionally, the City remains dedicated to advancing May 21, 2025
Revised Draft FY 2025/26 Work Plan

Page 2 of 2 ends

policies that protect the health, safety, and quality of life of its residents, while promoting a fiscally responsible and effective municipal operation.

If City Council approves the recommended revisions in the attached draft FY 2025/26 Work Plan, or has any additional revisions, Staff recommends Council direct Staff to bring back for formal adoption with the Budget on June 18th, 2025.

CEQA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT:

Not a project as defined by CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding for the projects contained in the draft Fiscal Year 2025/26 Work Plan vary from project to project. Some of the projects have been budgeted for; while others do not currently have funding identified at this time. The funding identified in this Work Plan is consistent with the funding that has been proposed in the FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27 Budget.

WORK PLAN:

This item is a comprehensive annual update to the Work Plan for FY 2025/26.

OPTIONS:
• Provide further feedback and input to the City Manager on the prioritization of actions within the revised draft Fiscal Year 2025/26 Work Plan.

CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION:

The City Manager recommends the City Council review and discuss the revised draft Fiscal Year 2025/26 Work Plan and direct the City Manager to return this item to Council for approval with the FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27 Budget on June 18th, 2025. ________________________
Alyssa Muto, City Manager
Attachment 1: Revised draft Fiscal Year 2025/26 Work Plan

COUNCIL WORK PLAN

FISCAL YEAR
2025-2026
2 Table of Contents
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT........................ 3
MISSION STATEMENT................................. 4
LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES.......................... 4

1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND LIVABLE COMMUNITIES 5

2. TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY....... 9

3. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY 16

4. YOUTH, SENIOR, AND COMMUNITY WELL-BEING 23

5. GENERAL GOVERNANCE AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY 30
ONGOING PRIORITIES & MonitORING ...... 38
3 CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
TBD – Will be included with Final Work Plan
4 MISSION STATEMENT
To have an efficient and effective City Government that works to balance fiscal sustainability while maintaining environmental sustainability, quality of life and community character.

LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
The City of Solana Beach is a vibrant coastal community committed to preserving its unique character while addressing the evolving needs of its residents. The City recently adopted a Legislative Policy that serves as a guiding framework for the City Council’s advocacy efforts on key priorities that enhance the quality of life for all residents. Through this policy, the City will actively pursue legislation and funding opportunities that advance local priorities such as affordable housing and livable communities, transportation solutions, environmental sustainability, and the well-being of youth, seniors, and the broader community. By taking thoughtful and strategic legislative action, we will ensure that Solana Beach continues to be a great place to live—a community that is safe, welcoming, and full of opportunity for all its residents.

Following review of all submitted legislation for the 2024-2025 California Legislative Session, and with consideration of this Council 2025 Work Plan, there are five recommended areas for legislative policy. These areas are overarching to cover sub-topical priorities that align with the City’s values and long-term goals. By establishing these key areas of focus, the City of Solana Beach seeks to enhance public safety, promote sustainable community growth, support the wellbeing of residents, and ensure efficient, accountable governance.

The five policy areas outlined in this platform reflect Solana Beach's commitment to being proactive in its legislative advocacy, addressing immediate concerns, and planning for the future.

The City will continue to advocate for legislation that strengthens local governance, secures resources for essential services, and fosters collaborative solutions with regional and state partners. Additionally, the City remains dedicated to advancing policies that protect the health, safety, and quality of life of its residents, while promoting a fiscally responsible and effective municipal operation.

1. Affordable Housing and Livable Communities

2. Transportation and Mobility

3. Environmental Sustainability and Energy

4. Youth, Senior, and Community Well-being

5. General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
Affordable Housing and Livable Communities
5 1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND LIVABLE

COMMUNITIES

1. General Plan Updates
Summary: The City’s first General Plan was originally adopted in 1988. Individual elements of the General Plan, including Land Use, Circulation, Noise, and Housing have been reviewed and revised over time. The City’s Housing Element was last updated in 2021, which outlines policies and goals for the housing planning period from April 15, 2021, through April 14, 2029. Annual reporting is conducted to monitor progress in implementing the Housing Element. As the next step in the General Plan update process, the City is required to update its Safety Element to maintain consistency with the recently updated San Diego County Hazard Mitigation Plan, comply with new State legislative requirements, and align with SANDAG’s Regional Plan.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Issue RFI for 1st City housing site (Pearl Project).

B. Release 2nd RFP for City housing site.

C. Develop permit ready ADU program.

D. Update Zoning Ordinance related to first floor commercial uses.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: The implementation of the policies and programs contained in the City’s Housing Element is a multi-year project. The costs are predominantly Staff time to draft and implement policies and programs. Where possible Staff will seek additional grant funding to assist with the implementation of this project. With respect to the ADU Permit Ready Program, the City projects an approximate cost of $100,000 for the purchase of plan sets for use by residents for standard studio and onebedroom ADU designs. No additional funding is expected to be needed for FY 2025/26.

2. Customer Assistance Program Improvements
Summary:

Customer assistance and responsiveness to complaints remain a top priority for the City.

Building on the need for conversions during the Covid-19 pandemic, in recent years the City has implemented a series of technological and procedural enhancements to better serve residents, businesses, and visitors. These improvements include upgrades to the City’s permit tracking software (TRAKiT), deployment of the My Community App for reporting issues, the creation of permit processing flowcharts to guide customers through the permitting process, and the launch of an online system for electronic plan submittal and review.

Affordable Housing and Livable Communities
6 To further improve service delivery, the City has launched online payment capabilities for business certificate renewals and is currently testing a public-facing interface that will allow new business certificate applications to be submitted and processed entirely online.

Additional online services now available include credit card payments for Summer Day Camp and Junior Lifeguard registration, photovoltaic/solar permit issuance, and business certificate renewals. The City is also working on expanded online permitting options, including electronic filing and processing for reroofing, water heater replacements, and electrical panel upgrades. These initiatives aim to streamline the permitting process and enhance the overall customer experience.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Develop a fee calculator that applicants may use to estimate building permit fees for a project prior to submitting an application.

B. Implement additional on-line application and payment process for business certificates and permits.

C. Prepare an annual report to Council on the My Community app including such things as usage, response time and highest reported issues.

D. Pursue hiring an in-house Building Inspector/Official.

E. Develop Over-The -Counter plan review and permitting program.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Most of the actions included in this item would be implemented using staff time as such resources are available. The new Building Department position would be tasked to further implement and update building processes to improve customer service response times. The new staff position would result in more office hours available to the public than currently contracted. The position would be paid for by reducing professional service expenditures to the City’s 3rd party building services consultant.

3. Outdoor Dining Regulations
Summary: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain restrictions were modified to assist the business community during the difficult economic times, and to allow residents and visitors to continue to safely utilize certain services such as restaurants, bars, beauty salons, and exercise/wellness businesses outdoors and with appropriate social distancing. These specific businesses were allowed to temporarily expand into outdoor areas including sidewalks and parking lots (public and private) to provide additional space, especially during the times when indoor operations were not allowed.

Due to the popularity of certain businesses, mainly restaurants, the City Council directed the City Manager to prepare draft requirements and regulations to permanently allow these outdoor operations, including ways to mitigate potential issues to parking, noise, safety, aesthetics and other foreseeable areas. In Spring 2024 staff worked with the City Council subcommittee to refine and update Temporary Use Permit (TUP) development standards and regulations related to Outdoor Dining and Sidewalk Cafés. The new provisions were implemented in July 2024 and staff has been working with each of the existing dining Affordable Housing and Livable Communities
7 establishments to update the respective permits that would be in conformance with the new TUP regulations.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Bring forward draft regulations to City Council for consideration.

B. Finalize strategy with respect to Coastal Commission permitting.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Development of draft regulations can be completed with Staff time.

4. South Sierra Mixed Use Affordable Housing Project (Pearl Project)
Summary: In 2014, the City Council approved the Hitzke Development Corporation mixed use affordable housing project on South Sierra Avenue on a City-owned parking lot. The project as adopted includes commercial space and parking, ten (10) affordable housing units and associated parking, and 31 replacement public parking spaces. Following approval of the project, significant delays were encountered including a legal challenge against the City and Hitzke Development Corporation, where the City prevailed at both the lower court and the Court of Appeals. During this delay, construction costs increased and the inability of the Applicant to obtain required affordable housing funding, including State and County grants, resulted in Hitzke providing notice to the City in November 2020, that the project was no longer going forward for construction.

On February 24, 2021, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Applicant provided to the City electronic copies of all plans prepared for the project. The City’s objective is to pursue development of the project pursuant to the prepared plans and approvals through issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP). This project would provide needed affordable housing adjacent to neighborhood services, including transit and commercial uses, and would further implement the goals of the Solana Beach Housing Element and the General Plan. Additionally, this project, if built, could also satisfy obligations from a settlement agreement from the 1990s related to the provision of deed-restricted affordable housing units in the City.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Issue RFI for RFP of this affordable housing site.

B. Update building permit plans for review/approval and construction.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Development of RFI for affordable housing site can be completed with Staff time.

Affordable Housing and Livable Communities
8 5. Local Coastal Program/Land Use Plan Adoption and Preparation of the Local Implementation Plan
Summary: The entirety of the City of Solana Beach lies within the boundaries of the Coastal Zone. In 2012, the California Coastal Commission certified the City’s prepared a Local Coastal Program (LCP) Land Use Plan (LUP). The City Council formally adopted the LUP in February 2013. In alignment with the CCC’s direction, the City Council adopted a fee schedule in 2018 to address public recreation impacts and sand mitigation associated with bluff retention devices along the coastline.

The City continues to work on this effort along with other updates to the LUP as staff availability and workload allow. As work continues on this update, the City continues to update the LUP with any new applicable regulations and coordinate with the CCC staff directly on all CDPs to ensure compliance with the Coastal Act.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Prepare documents necessary to update the City’s public recreation impact fee and sand mitigation fee.

B. Conduct public engagement and prepare a draft LIP and Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) to correct zoning information within the approved LUP.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: The estimated budget proposed for FY 2025/26 to continue the LCP Local Implementation Plan efforts is approximately $90,000 for consultant services. Additionally, the City has budgeted $100,000 for the necessary work to update the City’s public recreation impact fee and sand mitigation fee.

6. Short-Term Vacation Rental Permit Ordinance Update
Summary: The City’s current Short-Term Vacation Rental (STVR) Permit regulations allow for the rental of any residentially zoned dwelling unit, other than Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), including detached single-family residences, condominiums, duplexes, twinplexes, townhomes and multi-family dwellings. Since adoption of the City’s STVR regulations, the soaring popularity of vacation rental hosting websites has resulted in a proliferation of STVRs throughout the San Diego region. On an annual basis, Staff handles a variety of complaints regarding STVRs and their impacts to local neighborhoods including noise, parking and unruly guests. In order to maintain an appropriate balance of housing stock dedicated to residents and also to visitor accommodations, the City will evaluate the City’s Short Term Vacation Rental Permit regulations for potential amendments.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Evaluate existing STVR Permit regulations for modifications.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Development of draft regulations can be completed with Staff time.

Transportation and Mobility
9 2. TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY

1. Lomas Santa Fe Corridor Project
Summary: The Lomas Santa Fe Corridor project is a top priority due to the multiple benefits it could provide to the community. The project study area for the Lomas Santa Fe (LSF) Drive Corridor Project extends from Cedros Avenue on the East side of Highway 101 to Highland Drive at the City’s eastern boundary. The City’s goal for the Lomas Santa Fe Corridor Project is to construct physical improvements to improve the community character, safety, walkability, bikeability and circulation along this key east-west arterial through the City of Solana Beach.

The final design for the project was approved by the City Council on May 26, 2021. Partial funding for construction of the easterly segment of the project (from Santa Helena to Highland Drive) was secured from Congressman Levin’s office. Staff is working with Caltrans to obligate the $7,000,000 in federal funding, and is currently working through the federal procurement process that is required before the east side corridor improvements can be advertised for construction bids. The construction package was submitted to Caltrans for final review and approval in April 2025, as they are the delegated authority from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to approve projects using federal funds in California. Based on the current project schedule, it is anticipated that a construction contract can be awarded in late Summer/early Fall of 2025 and, construction can begin at the end of calendar year 2025.

Under the present design, construction of the west side corridor improvements, from the west side of Interstate 5 to Cedros Avenue, are projected at approximately $8 Million. The City has received approximately $850,000 for the west side construction project, and the City Staff is working to secure additional funding through budgetary earmarks and grant funding. Staff has applied for construction grants through SANDAG and Congressman Levin’s office. Since the roadway conditions require paving maintenance, in the interim, Lomas Santa Fe west of Interstate 5 has been included in the annual roadway repair project to overlay and restripe Lomas Santa Fe. This work would include narrowing – yet maintaining - the two travel lanes in both directions, and the installation of painted bike lanes with buffers in each direction. The west side paving project will be constructed as part of the annual maintenance and repair project is expected to start construction before the end of the 2025 calendar year.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Complete federal funding process with Caltrans for project east of Interstate 5, advertise for construction bids, award construction contract/approve PSA for construction management services and start construction.

B. Continue to apply for potential construction grant funding for the west section of the project.

Transportation and Mobility
10 C. Execute amendment to the PSA with City’s consultant to Prepare Construction Plans, Specifications, Estimate for the west side for competitive bidding purposes.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Construction of the entire length of the corridor is estimated to cost approximately $15 million. The project has been separated into two segments for construction purposes. The first phase consisting of the easterly segment of the project (from Santa Helena to Highland Drive) was estimated at $7 Million, which has been secured from Congressman Levin’s office. The City Council authorized a transfer of $1,000,000 of surplus Measure S funds at the end of FY 2023/24 to the CIP fund to cover any increase in costs that may have occurred since original scope and design. The City is expecting to expend the funding received for the east side in FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27.

The second phase is the west side (from I-5 to Cedros Avenue) is projected to cost approximately $8 Million. To date, the City has received $850,000 from Congressman Levin’s office.

2. Traffic Calming Projects
Summary: Several locations for traffic calming improvements, including signage and speed reduction installations (humps, pillows, tables, etc.), have been identified throughout the City. These projects include the monitoring and analysis of publicly initiated traffic calming requests and proposal of measures and installations that can be implemented within the public rights-of-way to enhance the user’s experience for all modes of transportation.

FY FY2025/26 Actions:

A. Monitor and assess traffic calming requests on Highland Drive south of Lomas Santa Fe, on San Mario Drive, and on Palmitas Street.

B. Review City’s Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (Traffic calming).

C. Present options pursuant to AB 43 (Friedman, Citywide speed reduction) for Council consideration (prioritize Highway 101 and Lomas Santa Fe).

D. Present framework options for implementation of AB 413 “Daylighting”.

E. Prior to final occupancy of the Solana Highlands project, implement the traffic calming measures included in the conditions of approval.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Staff will bring forward projectspecific requests as needed. $75,000 for miscellaneous traffic calming projects are expected to be appropriated in the FY 2025/26 & FY 2026/27 Adopted Budgets.

3. Implementation of the Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS) Study Projects
Summary: The Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS), approved by the City Council in 2015, identifies approximately 20 bicycle and pedestrian projects throughout Solana Beach. These projects are designed to enhance bikeability and walkability across Transportation and Mobility
11 neighborhoods and major corridors, and they align with the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) and Vision Zero goals.

The City advances Vision Zero through safe roadway design, prioritization of active transportation, Safe Routes to School programs, and traffic calming initiatives. In support of these efforts, SANDAG recently completed a regional Vision Zero Action Plan, offering cities strategies focused on the five E’s: Engineering, Education, Encouragement, Evaluation, and Enforcement.

Currently Active CATS Projects:
• Lomas Santa Fe (East of I-5) – Federal funding process underway; construction bids expected Summer 2025
• Lomas Santa Fe (West of I-5) – Out to Bid for Paving and Striping; construction anticipated to begin by end of 2025
• Glencrest Sidewalks – Design and Bid Phase
• Santa Helena Improvements – Design Phase
• Cliff Street (Cedros to Glenmont) – Preliminary Engineering FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. The City Engineer will prepare a memo to the City Manager outlining the plan for implementation over the next 5 years, including the number of projects in planning, design and implementation annually.

B. Review SANDAG’s Vision Zero Action Plan and implement any pertinent policies or strategies.

C. Install audio alerts on Lomas Santa Fe on-ramp and off-ramp crossings, or other identified locations, where visibility is limited. If feasible, implement lighting improvements for pedestrian crossings and bicycles inside the underpass.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Budget allocations for the various CATS projects are included in the budget.

4. Traffic Signal Upgrades
Summary: The City has 16 signalized intersections, that are maintained by Yune. The City’s traffic engineering consultant, STC Traffic, performed a citywide traffic signal assessment and made recommendations to maintain and improve the efficient and effective operation of the traffic signal systems. The first phase of improvements was to replace obsolete, damaged, and worn equipment, with a future phase to comprehensively upgrade and modernize the City’s system and equipment. The final component in the Phase I improvements was to install Battery Backup Systems for two intersections (1) Stevens/San Rodolfo (2) Stevens/Valley Ave. All work in Phase I is complete. The Phase II comprehensive system improvement will require significant costs, and a master plan based on priority components and upgrades.

Transportation and Mobility
12 FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Prepare a master plan for comprehensive system improvements as recommended in the Citywide assessment.

B. Analyze the feasibility of installing flashing left turn lights (permissive yellow) in appropriate locations.

C. As part of the Lomas Santa Fe – West pavement repair project, some of the items in Phase 2 of the signal upgrades will be completed. This includes installation of video detection systems (instead of loop detectors) at five intersections, replacement of controller hardware at five intersections, replacement of cabinets and battery backup systems at three intersections and other miscellaneous upgrades.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY2025/26 Phase II will consist of an evaluation and prioritization of projects and corresponding cost estimates consistent with the City’s traffic signal master plan. The City is expecting an appropriation of $230,000 for FY 2026/27 Adopted Budget from Gas Tax Funds for Phase II.

5. Highway 101 Tree Grate Replacement
Summary: Decorative tree grates were installed as part of the Highway 101 Westside Improvement Project back in 2011. Because of normal wear and tear, the tree grates are starting to deteriorate. This project will replace the existing, deteriorating tree grates along the west side of Highway 101. During FY 2024/25, a total of eight tree grates were purchased at a cost of approximately $25,000.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Replace tree grates along Highway 101 with Cast Iron Grey anti-skid tree grates.

B. The number of tree grates to be replaced in future years will be determined based on an as-needed basis.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: The estimated cost to replace an additional eight (8) tree grates is $25,000. The City is expecting an appropriation of $25,000 annually for FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27 Adopted Budgets from Coastal Business/Visitors Fund.

6. Glencrest Sidewalk Improvements
Summary: The Glencrest Sidewalk Improvement Project is identified as a high priority project in both the Safe Routes to School and CATS programs. The intent of this project is to provide safe pedestrian facilities while respecting private improvements and residential parking to the extent feasible without acquiring additional right of way. In 2024, the Council advanced a design for this project to include the construction of concrete curbs, gutters and sidewalks along both sides of Glencrest Drive from Lomas Santa Fe to Dell Street. The City is preparing construction drawings and bid documents that minimize impacts to the private improvements that are encroaching into the public right of way. Design should be completed Transportation and Mobility
13 by the end of December 2025. Construction could begin in the Spring of 2026. As mentioned below, Staff has submitted granting funding requests to three separate agencies. If this project receives grant funding, the grant funding requirements may impact the construction schedule.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Prepare plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) package B. Advertise for construction once funding has been identified.

C. Complete construction of the project, including coordination with adjacent property owners.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Construction drawings and bid documents are being performed by in-house Staff and will include an estimate of construction costs. There is $75,000 available which was included in the FY 2023/24 TransNet Budget that was rolled over to FY 2024/25. These funds will be rolled over to FY 2025/26. Staff has applied for construction grants through SANDAG, Congressman Levin’s office and State Assemblymember Boerner’s office.

7. Cliff Street Comprehensive Improvements
Summary: Cliff Street runs generally east to west, ascending steeply from its starting point at N. Cedros Avenue. Presently, Cliff Street is paved with asphalt/concrete (a/c), and has no sidewalk, intermittent a/c berms, and a variety of materials along the shoulder used primarily for parking. Currently, there is no underground drainage system in place, and precipitation and other runoff flow occurs from east to west, carrying sedimentation during storm events. City Council has requested that the City Engineer investigate possible designs for improved pedestrian access along Cliff Street. As part of this review, it is considered good Engineering practice to evaluate potential drainage improvements to mitigate runoff and erosion along this street. City Staff will evaluate the limitations and challenges with respect to existing private improvements encroaching into the right of way, co-alignment for drainage improvement, and possible design solutions for consideration by the City Council.

A continuous walkway would also be implemented along one side of the road to accommodate pedestrians.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Develop opportunities and constraints analysis for Cliff Street for pedestrian access, such as a walkway, and drainage.

B. Conduct engagement with residents and nearby businesses and schools on use and possible design ideas.

C. Develop design-level plans for the proposed drainage system.

D. Develop a construction-level cost estimate for the proposed drainage and walkway improvement.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Preliminary tasks will be performed by in-house Staff. Staff will continue to develop construction level plans, specifications and Transportation and Mobility
14 cost estimates with support from the City’s on-call civil engineering consultants. Additionally, Staff will work on designing appropriate right of way improvements along both sides to Cliff Street.

8. CRT Extension at North City Limits
Summary: This project is a continuation of the City’s existing Coastal Rail Trail (CRT) from its current terminus near Ocean Street, northerly to the City’s jurisdictional boundary with the City of Encinitas. The project would end at a proposed pedestrian crosswalk that would link the Harbaugh Seaside Trails to the Seaside State Beach in Encinitas. The project would include an extension of the concrete path, decomposed granite (DG) shoulders, landscaping, irrigation and minor concrete repairs to the existing concrete path. This work will also include a refresh and repairs to the existing northern segment of the CRT, including removal of the crescent deck platform, and replacement with similar drought-tolerant, native plantings.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Coordinate with City of Encinitas to connect the CRT extension to the proposed pedestrian crosswalk between Harbaugh Seaside Trails to the Seaside State Beach.

B. Include removal of the crescent deck platform and replace with landscaping consistent with existing landscaping.

C. Prepare plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) package.

D. Advertise for construction once funding has been identified.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Estimated total cost for this project is $375,000. The City is expecting to appropriate $375,000 in Public Recreation Impact Fees for FY 2025/26 & FY 2026/27 Adopted Budgets for design ($75,000) and construction ($300,000). Staff has applied for construction grants through Congressman Levin’s office and State Assemblymember Boerner’s office.

9. Santa Helena Neighborhood Trail
Summary: City Staff is working on a plan that would implement the recommendations contained in the CATS and Safe Routes to School studies. The paved area on Santa Helena, north of Sun Valley Road, is approximately 64 feet wide, with a painted median.

The area within the painted median was not constructed to carry vehicle traffic, and as a result, the traffic that crosses over the median area degrades the condition.

The citywide condition assessment identified Santa Helena as being in need of paving and repair work. In preparation for this paving work, Staff developed a comprehensive plan for a multi-use trail along Santa Helena; however, based on neighborhood feedback, that design is no longer being pursued. Pothole repair work within and adjacent to the painted medians was conducted in early 2025. City staff is now working on modified designs that include consideration of the median area, such as raised, planted medians or full reconstruction for long-term wear from crossing vehicle traffic. During the next year, City staff will be Transportation and Mobility
15 conducting additional community engagement on median options and plan for a paving project that can be implemented for the norther segments of Santa Helena.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Conduct additional community outreach on median options, paving and striping.

B. Prepare design and bid documents for the pavement repair and stripping project.

C. Advertise for construction bids, award construction contract and construct project.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: The FY 2024/25 Budget Update allocated a $450,000 transfer from the Measure S Fund to the CIP Fund for construction of this project. Depending on the community feedback on the median options, additional funding may be necessary for this project.

10. Electric Bicycle (E-Bike) Safety and Education Program Summary: The proliferation of E-Bikes in the city has resulted in both positive and negative impacts on the community. E-Bikes can help riders of all ages, skills and physical abilities live more active lives, reduce daily miles traveled in vehicles, and provide a convenient and clean mode of transportation around the community. However, there are significant safety concerns that have arisen as the popularity of E-Bikes has exploded. The City would like to continue to promote the use of E-Bikes in the community but also create a safe environment for pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The continued education of both E-Bike riders and the public is paramount to a harmonious community that can both foster clean alternative modes of transportation while protecting the health and safety of the residents.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Continue the partnership with the San Diego County Bike Coalition and BikeWalkSolana to provide E-Bike safety educational workshops and practical exercises throughout the community. These trainings should incorporate driver education related to bikes and EBikes safety as laws are constantly changing.

B. Continue to collaborate with the local schools to provide educational opportunities and on the permit program for E-Bike riders.

C. Partner with the local bicycle shops on educational opportunities when E-Bikes are purchased. Coordinate/communicate ongoing educational workshops/seminars to bike shops to distribute when e-bikes are sold.

D. Coordinate with Sheriff’s Office on enforcement actions of illegal (not street legal) ebikes.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Anticipated costs associated with partnering with the San Diego County Bike Coalition and BikeWalkSolana are approximately $6000 for the education and training programs in FY 2025/26.

Environmental Sustainability and Energy
16 3. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND
ENERGY

1. Climate Action Plan Update
Summary: In October 2024, the City of Solana Beach adopted an updated Climate Action Plan (CAP), building upon the original 2017 plan. This update reflects advancements in technology, evolving market trends, and the latest scientific best practices to strengthen the City’s response to climate change. According to the most recent greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory (2018), prepared by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and the Energy Policy Initiatives Center (EPIC), Solana Beach has achieved a 40% reduction in emissions compared to 2010 levels.

To sustain and accelerate this progress, the City will prioritize implementation of CAP strategies and actions aimed at further reducing GHG emissions and enhancing community resilience. Key initiatives for the upcoming fiscal year include:
• Expansion of publicly accessible electric vehicle charging infrastructure • Launch of a heat pump water heater incentive program
• Tree canopy expansion to increase urban greening and cooling • Identification of Benchmarks for a Building Performance Standard (BPS) • Completion of a new GHG inventory to track progress
The City continues to collaborate with regional partners and coalitions to ensure effective and coordinated CAP implementation. Additional details on policies and action items can be found in the Climate Action Plan Update (Climate Action Plan | Solana Beach).

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Implement priority actions as outlined in the CAP Update Implementation Matrix.

B. Research a public charging station program, focusing first on underserved areas, or areas with multifamily residential.

C. Continue working on the feasibility of a microtransit pilot program; over the next year continue engaging focus groups to determine demand and researching potential funding options.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Staff estimates $100,000 annually to implement various actions, as identified in the CAP Update Implementation Matrix. As projects are identified and costs are finalized, projects will be brought to the City Council. In addition, $230,000 is estimated for public EV parking infrastructure and $100,000 for the planning and pilot framework for a senior, microtransit pilot program. Additional cost analysis will be conducted on the CAP actions for implementation, as needed.

Environmental Sustainability and Energy
17 2. Continued Participation in Clean Energy Alliance (CEA) Summary: The City of Solana Beach has been at the forefront of promoting and establishing a local Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program. In February 2018, the City Council gave final approval to launch Solana Energy Alliance (SEA), and SEA officially began operations in June 2018, becoming the first CCA in San Diego County. SEA transitioned to the Clean Energy Alliance (CEA) in collaboration with the cities of Carlsbad and Del Mar.

CEA currently includes the cities of Carlsbad, Del Mar, Solana Beach, Escondido, San Marcos, Oceanside, and Vista.

The City of Solana Beach remains proud of its leadership role in launching the first CCA in San Diego County and looks forward to continuing its efforts in promoting sustainable energy solutions through the Clean Energy Alliance.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Advocate the potential to increase the baseline RPS of CEA to eventually reach the 100% RPS goal as soon as possible but no later than 2035. CEA has incorporated incremental (~2%) annual increases to the RPS in its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), as well as the pro forma, to achieve 100% by 2035.

B. Continue to work with the CEA Board and staff to expand programs for local generation and storage programs.

C. Engage CEA to explore incentive programs for heat pumps/water heater installations.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Participation in CEA meetings and events will be limited to Staff time.

3. City Facility Energy Efficiency and Decarbonization Upgrades Summary: City facilities represent a significant opportunity to reduce municipal energy consumption, lower utility costs, and demonstrate leadership in sustainability. By investing in targeted energy efficiency upgrades, Solana Beach can make meaningful progress toward its Climate Action Plan (CAP) goals while also improving building performance and resilience. Potential upgrades include the installation of high-efficiency lighting systems, modern HVAC units, energy-efficient windows, and, where feasible, on-site renewable energy systems such as photovoltaic (solar) panels and battery energy storage systems.

These improvements not only reduce greenhouse gas emissions but can also lead to longterm cost savings through lower energy bills and reduced maintenance needs.

To evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of these upgrades, City staff will collaborate with energy efficiency consultants to assess the condition and energy performance of municipal buildings. This assessment will include identification of high-impact energy efficiency measures, projected energy and cost savings over time, and operational and maintenance considerations. In parallel, staff will research and pursue potential funding sources to support implementation, including federal and state grants, utility rebates, and low-interest financing programs. These financial mechanisms could make it possible to Environmental Sustainability and Energy
18 move forward with projects that offer strong environmental and economic returns. Findings from this effort can inform and serve as a model for local businesses and residents and future updates to the Climate Action Plan.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Draft and issue an RFP for an Energy Efficiency Consultant to evaluate potential energy projects for City facilities.

B. Research opportunities for the City to enter into Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and obtain funding for Microgrids at City facilities.

C. Pursue the design and installation of operable windows at City Hall.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Total costs unknown and would be determined after identifying the scope of the project.

4. Marine Safety Center
Summary: The City’s Marine Safety Center is deficient and does not meet current and longterm needs of the community and beach visitors. The existing facility is dilapidated with design deficiencies that don’t meet the current needs of our lifeguards with respect to storage, operations, and technology, as well as facilities for persons with disabilities or of different genders/identities. A needs assessment study was completed in June 2017, which determined that the best alternative was to demolish the existing building and construct a new building.

A Professional Services Agreement with an architectural consultant was approved in October 2018, to develop a preliminary site and building design for a new Marine Safety Center. Following a community meeting in February 2019, the City consultant prepared three design options that were presented to the Council during a public hearing in November 2019. Upon receiving direction from the Council and input from the community, a facility design was developed, and story poles were installed in April 2022. After receiving testimony from the public, the City Council provided further direction to the City Manager to modify the proposed design to minimize view impacts without jeopardizing the operational needs for the Lifeguard Station. Following numerous design iterations, a second set of story poles were installed in October 2024. As part of the December 2024 public meeting, the Council approved a modified design and adopted a Development Review Permit (DRP)/Site Development Permit (SDP) for the replacement of the Marine Safety Center.

The next step for the project is to submit a Coastal Development Permit application to the California Coastal Commission. Upon receipt of the necessary permits, the City will prepare final engineering and construction design documents to be released for bid for construction.

While allocation of funding for construction of the Marine Safety Facility is still pending, throughout the next phases, the City will be exploring the availability of grant funding and/or alternative approaches for this significant public capital investment to ensure construction of this project can start at the earliest possible time given the remaining regulatory and financial requirements for this important City facility project.

Environmental Sustainability and Energy
19 FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Prepare additional technical studies and apply for a Coastal Development Permit.

B. Engage Coastal Commissioners for a site visit to see existing conditions.

C. Research and apply for grant funding opportunities.

D. Upon approval of the CDP, prepare final engineering and construction design documents.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: As part of the update in January 2024, the City Council authorized an increase to the PSA with the Consultant (domusstudio) in the amount of $500,000. This budget allocation will be carried forward into FY 2025/26 to allow the project to progress through the Coastal permitting process and receipt of an engineering cost estimate for a construction bid solicitation. It is anticipated that additional funding will be necessary in future fiscal years to complete the state permitting, prepare construction level plans and specifications, and advertise for competitive construction bids.

Council authorized a transfer of $1,000,000 in surplus Measure S funds at the end of FY2023/24 to the CIP fund towards future construction costs for the Marine Safety Building.

An additional $700,000 in design services and an additional $1,000,000 in future construction costs are expected to be appropriated in the FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27 Adopted Budget from Measure S funds.

5. Fletcher Cove Improvements
Summary: The proposed Fletcher Cove Improvements consist of the replacement of the beach access ramp, the dissipater grate at the bottom of the ramp, and improvements to the shower area, including the drainage and expansion of number of shower heads. The ramp replacement includes replacing the concrete ramp, the asphalt concrete walkway immediately south of the ramp, the concrete curb and the metal handrailing. The existing dissipator grate was installed in approximately 1998, as part of the NCTD train station project and associated drainage work. Due to the ocean weather and salt water, the dissipator grate is corroding and needs to be replaced. A Coastal Development Permit waiver from the California Coastal Commission was obtained in November 2023, for replacement of the dissipator grate and associated beach access ramp improvements. This project was advertised for construction bids in April 2025 and planned to be awarded in July 2025. It is anticipated that construction can start after Labor Day (September 1, 2025) to avoid the peak summer months.

In addition to the ramp, dissipator and shower project, improvements/repairs are needed for the decorative surfacing within the park. These repairs will occur near the Nautilus landing between the Lifeguard and restroom buildings, at the compass adjacent to the vehicle entrance along South Sierra Avenue and other small miscellaneous concrete repairs throughout the park.

Environmental Sustainability and Energy
20 FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Construct the comprehensive Fletcher Cove Improvement Project to include the replacement of the concrete access ramp and walkway, replacement of the dissipater grate and installation of a new shower tower, with foot showers, near the bottom of the access ramp.

B. Repair Lithocrete/decorative concrete in areas to be specified throughout the park.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Construction bids were received for repairs to the access ramp, replacement of the dissipator and additional shower improvements. With the inclusion of materials testing and construction contingency, the construction contract is expected to cost approximately $510,000. There is $190,000 allocated in the Sand Retention Fund’s FY 2024/25 Adopted Budget and $60,000 in the Coastal/Visitors Fund’s FY 2024/25 Adopted Budget, which will be rolled to FY 2025/26 for project completion. An additional $260,000 will be added to the FY 2025/26 Proposed Budget from the Measure S Funds for the access ramp replacement project. Additional work for the Lithocrete/paving repairs are proposed at $140,000 to be appropriated in FY 2025/26 Proposed Budget from the Measure S Funds.

6. Major Storm Drain System Improvement Projects
Summary: There are a number of storm drain systems throughout the City that are in need of improvements/upgrades. This project provides ongoing priority ranking, design and construction of city-wide storm drain system improvements based on available funding. A project was completed in FY 2023/24 to line and replace several Corrugated Metal Pipes that were in the worst condition. The FY 2024/25 project will consist of open trench replacement of deteriorated corrugated metal pipes (CMP) throughout the City. A construction contract was awarded at the March 12, 2025, City Council meeting and construction started on May 12, 2025. It is expected that this project will be completed before the end of the 2025 calendar year. There is also a separate pipelining project that was identified in the FY 2024/25 CIP budget. This project was advertised for construction bids in April 2025 and is expected to begin construction during the Fall of 2025.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Identify priority projects to continue to improve storm drain infrastructure throughout the City.

B. Complete design, procurement and construction of identified projects.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Estimated total cost of $500,000 for storm drain improvements in Fiscal Year 2025/26, which is expected to be appropriated in the FY 2025/26 Adopted Budget, with $300,000 from the Measure S Fund and $200,000 from the Misc. CIP Fund.

Environmental Sustainability and Energy
21 7. The Mayors Monarch Pledge
Summary: The monarch butterfly, an iconic species, has seen a dramatic decline in its populations, with eastern populations decreasing by 90% and western populations by 99% in recent years. To combat this decline, the City of Solana Beach has joined the National Wildlife Federation's (NWF) Mayors' Monarch Pledge. This initiative encourages U.S. cities, municipalities, and communities to create habitats for the monarch butterfly and other pollinators, and to educate residents on how they can contribute to these efforts at home and within their communities.

By taking the Mayors' Monarch Pledge, mayors must commit to implementing at least three of the 30 action items listed on the NWF website (nwf.org/MayorsMonarchPledge) each year they participate. At least one of these actions must come from the “Program & Demonstration Gardens” section. Mayors who complete eight or more actions are recognized as part of the National Wildlife Federation’s Mayors’ Monarch Pledge Leadership Circle, and those who complete 24 or more actions are honored as Monarch Champions.

The City of Solana Beach first committed to the pledge for the 2021 program year and has renewed its pledge annually for each year thereafter. The City is actively involved in this initiative by implementing various action items, such as establishing demonstration gardens, hosting educational events, and planting milkweed and pollinator-friendly native nectar plants. Furthermore, the City reports its progress annually, detailing the engagement activities, the number of participants, and the specifics of the planted areas to track and promote the success of these conservation efforts.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Continue to engage with the SeaWeeders and other partners to support monarch butterfly conservation and plant native milkweeds and nectar-producing plants in locations like the Coastal Rail Trail, at the La Colonia Community Center, and other City-owned properties.

B. Add or maintain native milkweed and nectar producing plants in community gardens and at the El Jardin de los Ninos at the La Colonia Community Center.

C. Add native milkweed and nectar producing plans at new City projects, including the future Glenmont Park.

D. Prepare annual report about progress on the above three actions including statistics on numbers of plants purchased or planted per the Mayors’ Monarch Pledge guidelines.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Maintenance costs for plants and any costs for new plants to replenish existing monarch gardens is approximately $1,000 annually (included within Public Works budget). To expand to other City-owned properties, Staff anticipates another $10,000 in plant, irrigation, and labor costs (to be included within the Climate Action Plan budget).

Environmental Sustainability and Energy
22 8. San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative
Summary: The San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative is a network of public agencies, nonprofits, businesses, and academia working together to advance climate change solutions and promote sustainability across the San Diego region. By fostering collaboration and information sharing, the Collaborative aims to enhance regional efforts in climate protection, resilience, and sustainability.

The City of Solana Beach has been an active participant in the San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative, engaging in various initiatives to advance sustainability and climate resilience.

Over the years, the City has collaborated with other member jurisdictions to share best practices, develop and implement climate action plans, and participate in regional projects focused on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing climate resilience. Notable achievements include the successful implementation of waste minimization programs, efforts to protect and restore healthy ecosystems, and initiatives to improve water quality and efficiency. Through its ongoing participation, the City continues to demonstrate leadership in promoting sustainability and addressing climate change at the regional level.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Renew the City membership and attend the San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative meetings and sponsored events.

D.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Participation in SDRCC meetings and events will be limited to Staff time. If sponsorship or other opportunities are presented, additional budget authorizations will be consistent with City policy.

Youth, Senior, and Community Well-being
23 4. YOUTH, SENIOR, AND COMMUNITY WELLBEING

1. La Colonia Park Improvements
Summary: In 2006, a community-based La Colonia Park Needs Assessment Advisory Committee developed recommendations for improvements throughout La Colonia Park, which included among other improvements, ADA-compliant ramps and pathways throughout the park and facilities. The City completed the conceptual design for the park improvements in December 2009, and preliminary design of the park in September 2010.

Since the original La Colonia Master Plan (LCMP) was completed, three components of the LCMP were built as separate projects. Construction of the Veteran’s Honor Courtyard was completed in May 2016, construction of the La Colonia Skate Park was completed in April 2019, and the new tot lot playground was completed in May 2024.

With the City’s purchase of the property immediately north of the skate park, there was a need to re-evaluate the property and existing park, and the needs and priorities. The Council approved a PSA for updating the La Colonia Master Plan in February 2022, and a public workshop was held in February 2023 to gather community input on priorities and needs for design, operations, and facilities onsite. Updates were provided to the City Council in March 2024 and February 2025. While work continues on the larger Master plan document, Staff has prepared a conceptual drawing of potential interim improvements that could be implemented before the full LCMP is completed and construction funding is identified.

These interim improvements include passive uses of the vacant lot north of the La Colonia Skate Park and may include features such as minor grading to facilitate pedestrian access from the existing park, decomposed granite walkways, seating, grass area, irrigation improvements, and maintaining existing mature trees and landscape.

While ongoing maintenance and smaller facility and park improvements are programmed, the City continues to seek additional funding for expansion, park improvements, including ADA-compliant renovations in compliance with the City’s ADA Transition Plan.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Conduct outreach and complete design for the new City building to include youth and senior center.

B. Heritage Museum: Prepare a construction bid package (RFB) for roof repairs, fascia repairs, and various other building improvements at the museum. Conduct bid process and complete construction
Youth, Senior, and Community Well-being
24 C. Determine feasibility of interim building solutions to open community center main entrance and install new windows. This would include the relocation of the “Tree of Life” that celebrates the founding families of the La Colonia neighborhood.

D. Identify interim outdoor improvements around trellis and courtyard area.

E. Develop concept for interim park improvements on vacant lots north of the Skate Park.

Present interim park improvements to community and City Council.

F. Install echo/noise control in the large Community Room.

G. Initiate a planning process to explore a comprehensive guiding plan for the community that can provide further design and setback regulations to maintain the historic and cultural history of the neighborhood.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: The total Capital Improvement Plan costs for La Colonia Park Improvements is estimated to cost $913,000, with $500,000 from Measure S Funds, $300,0000 from Public Development Impact Fees Fund, $66,000 from Facilities Replacement Fund; expected to be appropriated in the FY 2025/26 & FY 2026/27 Adopted and $47,000 Facilities Replacement Fund available in FY 2024/25 Budget that will be rolled over as well. Funding is proposed to be allocated as follows:
• Interim improvements to vacant lot, community center entrance and outdoor courtyard - $800,000
• Community Center – replacement of HVAC Unit – $30,000 • Community Center – replacement of HVAC Control System – $6,000 • Community Room inside Community Center – echo/noise control for the – $30,000 • Heritage Museum – roof and fascia repairs – $47,000

2. Age Friendly Communities Action Plan
Summary: The City acknowledges the importance of addressing the needs of its aging population, which is one of the oldest in San Diego County. In partnership with the San Diego Foundation, the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP), and San Diego State University, the City has embraced the Age-Friendly Communities Program. This initiative seeks to create more livable environments for residents of all ages and abilities by promoting programs and system-level changes.

The Age-Friendly Solana Beach Action Plan, adopted by the City Council on March 22, 2023, outlines strategies to address various needs of older adults, including transportation, housing, outdoor spaces and buildings, community support and health services, respect and social inclusion, communication and information, social participation, and civic participation and enjoyment.

Moving forward, City Staff will continue to implement programs and policies outlined in the adopted Age-Friendly Action Plan. Solana Beach remains committed to fostering an inclusive and supportive community where residents of all ages can thrive.

Youth, Senior, and Community Well-being
25 FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Implement circulator or shuttle services specifically tailored to meet the transportation needs of seniors, providing convenient access to essential services and amenities.

B. Continue to coordinate with other local service providers, including Solana Beach Community Connections, Solana Beach Presbyterian Church, the County Library, etc. to maximize programs and services for the senior community.

C. Work with youth organizations such as the Solana Beach School District, San Dieguito Unified High School District, and San Dieguito Boys & Girls Club, to develop a program that pairs youth with senior residents to provide companionship, friendship, and mentoring/tutoring opportunities that reflect both the City of Kindness initiative and the Age-Friendly Action Plan
D. Increase community-based senior health and wellness programs and activities, including exercise classes, health screenings, and support groups tailored to the needs of older adults.

E. Within capital projects or facility improvement, include designs that promote accessibility and walkability for persons of all abilities.

F. Identify funding for fixed- and low-income senior homeowners to retrofit their properties with age-friendly features such as grab bars, wheelchair ramps, and non-slip flooring.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Costs for implementing a circulator service continue to be developed through further engagement and funding opportunities.

Staff has recommended $100,000 be allocated in the next fiscal year budget for this purpose. City Staff will continue to explore partnerships to maximize senior programs and services including utilizing City facilities. Staff will continue to work with organizations such as the Boys and Girls Club, Solana Beach Presbyterian Church Senior Center and Solana Beach Community Connections to provide programming for the senior community.

However, increased programs and services may require more investment from the City, which will be brought to Council for consideration before implementation.

3. Glenmont Neighborhood Park
Summary: The City has been working with Santa Fe Irrigation District (SFID) to explore the possibility of the development of a park along Glenmont Avenue adjacent to the SFID reservoir. The City has initiated discussions with SFID to create an agreement and a timeline for the development of a future neighborhood park at this location. The site is presently excess land around the tank, and planned to be used by SFID as a construction staging and laydown yard for a seismic retrofit and roof replacement project for the existing tank. The SFID is currently conducting a study of the scope and timeline for that reservoir repair work.

The City is working with SFID to create a timeline for design, funding, bid, and construction following the completion of the tank project. In the meantime, the City has completed conceptual design work for a passive neighborhood park. Future fiscal year work will include city and CCC permitting, construction RFP and bid process, and construction.

Youth, Senior, and Community Well-being
26 FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Work with the community to receive project feedback on design and prepare a preliminary project timeline and conceptual design.

B. Enter into an agreement with Santa Fe Irrigation District.

C. Work with residents and SFID to minimize impacts related to any work in proximity to the tank or during tank improvement project construction to the greatest extent possible.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: It is estimated that the conceptual design and public outreach would cost approximately $10,000, and the estimated cost for preparation of construction plans including landscaping and irrigation plans is $65,000.

Additional funding will be required for future fiscal years for construction; a construction cost estimate will be provided after the project is designed. There is $350,000 available which was included in FY 2024/25 CIP budget. The City is expecting an additional $75,000 to be appropriated in the FY 2026/27 Adopted Budget from Public Use Facilities Impact Fee Fund.

Staff has also included a placeholder amount of $1,000,000 in the FY 2027/28 CIP budget for construction of the project.

4. Fletcher Cove Community Park and El Viento Pocket Park Trail Upgrade
Summary: The existing trail system in both locations are subject to significant erosion during storm events. This project would convert the existing D.G trail pathways into a more stable semi-pervious surfacing that can withstand high-precipitation storm events and is ADA compliant. Staff is doing research on alternative products, and pursuing a pilot project for an acceptable product that can be used in lieu of bonded/stabilized DG.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Develop a set of design plans, specifications, and cost estimate (PS&E) for both sites.

B. Conduct bid process and complete construction.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: The preliminary cost for both sites is estimated at $200,000, which is currently appropriated in the FY 2024/25 CIP Fund and will be rolled over to FY 2025/26.

5. City of Kindness Coalition
Summary: The City of Kindness is a coalition of organizations dedicated to inspiring and promoting kindness worldwide. This initiative aims to effect meaningful change among schools, professionals, young people, elected officials, and companies. It is a project of the Social Impact Fund, a non-profit public charity that supports efforts to advance social good and make a positive difference globally.

Youth, Senior, and Community Well-being
27 Mayors across the country have united to encourage the nation to adopt a culture of kindness in our cities, businesses, and schools through acts of kindness. Solana Beach is officially a part of this coalition, and our Staff will continue to collaborate with the community group to promote the program and assist with events regularly. We will integrate these activities into City events and programming to foster a kinder and more inclusive community.

By working together, we can create an environment where kindness thrives, benefiting everyone in our city.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Install banners with themes to implement the City of Kindness programs.

B. Encourage acts of kindness throughout the community and submittal of observed acts of kindness to the Kindness Counter link on the City’s website.

C. Host outreach efforts concurrently with existing City events for residents of all ages to come together on projects with positive messages of kindness and encouragement.

D. Continue annual World Kindness Day celebration event in November to bring the community together with fun and interactive kindness activities at Fletcher Cove Park.

E. Initiate quarterly “Solana Beach Cares – Seasonal Kindness Drives” to collect and distribute community donations of essential food and other necessities to those in need.

F. Develop a working group of non-profits and other interested stakeholders to meet on a regular basis to promote the City of Kindness programs.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: These actions can be completed with City Staff time.

6. Replacement of Emergency Generator at Fire Station
Summary: The existing generator at the fire station is approximately 28 years old and was installed when the fire station was constructed in 1991. Due to the age of the existing generator, the permit with the Air Pollution Control Board only allows for the operation of the generator up to 20 hours per year in non-emergency situations during testing and maintenance. As part of the design study, the operational needs of the building were evaluated to determine the size of the generator required. The electrical switchgear was also evaluated to determine if upgrades were necessary. The project was advertised for construction bids during FY 2024/25 and the City Council awarded a construction contract in April 2025. It is anticipated that the construction and installation will occur in Fall of 2025.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Contractor to obtain permits from Air Pollution Control District (APCD).

B. Contractor to order generator. Lead time to procure new generator is 16 to 20 weeks.

C. Complete construction and installation of project.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY2025/26: Complete construction funding is estimated to cost $243,000 plus $30,000 in contingency was appropriated as part of the Youth, Senior, and Community Well-being
28 award of a construction contract on April 23, 2025, with $209,000 current appropriated as part of the FY 2024/25 Adopted Budget in CIP fund. The shortfall of $41,000 will be allocated from the CIP undesignated fund balance.

7. Synthetic Drug Substance Prohibition
Summary: Synthetic substances, commonly referred to as Bath Salts or Spice, are documented that when consumed to cause hallucinations, agitation, psychosis, aggression, suicidal tendencies, among other things. While newly created drugs often go unregulated in California due to testing and other regulatory requirements, many of these substances are given emergency scheduling under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The City Council has directed the City Manager to develop appropriate regulatory language to be considered by the Council to prohibit the manufacturing, sale, distribution and/or possession of Federal Schedule I drugs, including novel synthetic drugs.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Develop proposed regulatory language that incorporates updates under state law by reference to be considered for adoption by the Council.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Development of draft regulations can be completed with Staff time.

8. Healthy and Livable Communities
Summary: The City of Solana Beach has always been a leader in initiating programs and policies to encourage a healthy, safe and thriving community. Throughout the years, the City has adopted progressive policies to ensure the health of all residents, especially focused on youth and seniors. While these policies are sprinkled throughout this Work Plan in various Priority Items, we felt it was important to add a dedicated item to include any programs or projects that were not specifically included in other sections of the Work Plan.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Continue to develop and implement programs that encourage active participation for the youth and seniors in the community.

B. Research the potential for a multifamily smoking ban ordinance.

C. Continue to work with our Public Safety Departments to ensure a safe and welcoming community. This includes fire safety, law enforcement participation and Marine Safety involvement to ensure residents and visitors feel safe, businesses have access to resources and feel secure, and residents have tools to ensure the protection of their property.

D. Research possible restrictions on wood burning appliances and fireplaces.

Youth, Senior, and Community Well-being
29 E. Review and update urban agricultural regulations related to backyard chickens, beekeeping, fruit trees.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Staff time will be needed to develop and implement additional programs to promote community well-being. Any significant new programs will be brought to City Council for consideration, which may include dedication of new funding.

General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
30 5. GENERAL GOVERNANCE AND FISCAL

RESPONSIBILITY

1. Legislative Platform and Lobbying
Summary: Legislative priorities for the City are generally reflected throughout this Work Plan. The following is a list of actions that should be conducted on an annual basis and with regular review to ensure new and pending legislation is being responded to in a manner consistent with the City’s priorities and regulations.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Update Legislative Priority List annually for Council Consideration and develop policy on priority topic areas to support/advocate.

B. Continue to work with lobbyists to promote City agenda and priorities.

C. Engage representatives and submit letters to further City and regional priorities.

D. Adopt City ordinances and policies to respond to and remain compliant with changes in law.

E. Explore opportunities or alternatives for City governance such as a Charter City.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: The City’s lobbyists are engaged at a total estimated not to exceed amount of $107,000 for Fiscal Year 2025/26, including federal public affairs.

2. Staff Engagement and Effectiveness
Summary: The Staff in the City of Solana Beach are the backbone of operations and essential for delivering vital services to our residents. Recognizing their expertise, individualism and role fosters a strong, Staff-focused workplace. The cornerstone to the success of our city lies in prioritizing their well-being, growth, and recognition as key drivers of community success. Creating a highly supportive municipal work environment should include Staff engagement aimed at empowering employees, supporting professional growth, and maximizing skills that contribute to organizational success. This can be realized through a consistent and fair approach to hiring that ensures inclusiveness, transparency and internal promotional opportunities.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Create programs that implement an “open-door policy” where employees can share their ideas, concerns, and suggestions for continuous improvement of the City as a workplace and a community.

General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
31 B. Identify opportunities as part of the annual review process for Staff to pursue certifications, attend workshops, and participate in ongoing training and development opportunities to enhance employees' skills and knowledge.

C. Conduct mandatory training for all (100%) permanent City employees focused on promoting accountability, transparency, and ethical standards.

D. Conduct annual performance reviews and regular feedback sessions to provide employees with opportunities for growth and improvement.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: These actions can be completed with City Staff time.

3. Promote a Diverse and Inclusive Work Environment
Summary: Recognizing the evolving social and political landscape, organizations are actively working towards fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion within their ranks.

Research indicates that beyond legal and moral imperatives, diversity and inclusion offer substantial competitive advantages. The City is committed to nurturing an inclusive workplace culture, emphasizing employee engagement to bolster professional advancement, development, and retention. These objectives are communicated transparently to Staff and the Council, with progress assessed through key performance indicators that track trends within the City and across the broader region. By incorporating these actions, the City can actively promote and cultivate a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplace environment.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Implement regular diversity training sessions and workshops for all Staff members to raise awareness and promote understanding of diverse perspectives, cultures, and identities.

B. Review and update City policies and procedures to ensure they are inclusive and supportive of all employees, regardless of their background or identity.

C. Collaborate with local community organizations and advocacy groups to foster partnerships and initiatives that promote diversity and inclusion both within the City workforce and the broader community.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: These actions can be completed with City Staff time; additional funding may be necessary to bring in outside speakers or forms of DEI workshops for City Staff.

4. Implement Performance Measurement Program
Summary: Implementing a performance measurement program involves establishing a systematic approach to evaluate and track the effectiveness and efficiency of the City. By measuring the current activities areas for improvement can be identified. The City can work with the employees to make adjustments in programs, policies and practices that can result General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
32 in a better workplace environment, with improved organizational productivity and with optimal customer service.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Complete analysis of FY 2024/2025 performance measures and report results and action plan to City Council in the FY 2025/2026 Budget.

B. Identify relevant Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that align with City Council goals and ensure both customer service and a positive workplace experience are maintained.

C. Identify appropriate community survey tool(s) to evaluate customer satisfaction that match with the performance measurement goals.

D. Recognize/Evaluate existing Committees/Commissions and un-official Committees/Commissions and develop performance measures and/or guidelines for these designees.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: These actions can be completed with City Staff time.

5. Digital Communications
Summary: The City continues to effectively utilize digital communications to keep the community engaged, informed, and connected. Regular updates to the City’s website, email alerts, the weekly e-newsletter (Solana Beach Weekly Update), and active use of social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Threads & LinkedIn) allow the City to promptly share important information regarding City services, programs, news, and events. In the coming year, there will be a concentrated effort to expand the City’s social media presence and maximize the use of digital platforms to better promote and grow community forward programs, events and initiatives, such as the City of Kindness Initiative. Social media accounts will focus on key news updates, special events, and specific programs like the Junior Lifeguard Program, Summer Day Camp Program, and various special events to ensure residents stay informed about important updates and opportunities. By incorporating the following actions, the City can effectively leverage its digital outreach as a tool for community engagement and promotion of City programs, events, and initiatives.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Continue to increase community engagement by growing the City’s social media accounts and providing useful and community focused information and posts.

B. Provide training for City Staff to ensure social media accounts are managed responsibly and content is appropriate and reflective of the City.

C. Regularly monitor social media channels for comments, messages, and mentions to ensure information is consistent with City-driven information.

D. Create partnerships with local businesses and organizations to amplify the reach of City messages and events on social media.

General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
33 E. If possible, track key metrics such as reach and engagement to measure the effectiveness of social media efforts and to inform future communication to residents and businesses.

F. Evaluate the effectiveness of current social media strategies and make adjustments as necessary to better align with community interests and engagement goals.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Most of the social media tasks are completed by City Staff. The City does pay approximately $90 a month for the Constant Contact notification system.

6. Cyber Security Expansion- Awareness Training, Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery
Summary: The City made significant strides in strengthening cybersecurity infrastructure and operational readiness. A full deployment of a Cybersecurity Operations System was completed, providing enhanced visibility and threat detection across the network. Staff refined the Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Plan by improving network redundancy through the installation of UPS battery backups and rewiring of the switch stack and patch panel infrastructure for greater efficiency and reliability.

In parallel, the City launched a comprehensive Cybersecurity Awareness Program, which included four quarterly phishing campaigns, remediation training for participants, one citywide cybersecurity awareness survey, and a third-party cybersecurity assessment to evaluate current practices and identify risks. Additionally, the city has partnered with local cybersecurity groups such as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) for external penetration testing done bi-weekly to the network.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Implement cybersecurity incident response protocols based on NIST guidelines, including reporting and escalation procedures.

B. Expand cybersecurity training offerings with role-specific modules for staff handling sensitive data.

C. Conduct an annual tabletop exercise to test Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery readiness.

D. Establish a recurring schedule for backup system audits and validation tests.

E. Review and update the City's Information Security Policies to reflect evolving cybersecurity threats and best practices.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26:

Core cybersecurity infrastructure is in place; current efforts will focus on training, policy development, and testing. All anticipated costs are included within the existing IT budget allocations.

General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
34 7. Unified Communications
Summary: The City continued its initiative to modernize and unify its communication platforms during FY 2024/25. Staff completed an internal audit to remove unused phone lines, and public Wi-Fi was successfully expanded to La Colonia Park and Fletcher Cove.

Council approved a new vendor for the City’s phone system, and deployment is scheduled for the upcoming fiscal year. In addition, Council Chambers technology was upgraded to allow remote participation by Council, Staff or presenters, including the installation of voting PC monitors, kiosk displays, enhanced sound with hard-wired microphones, and streamlined AV switching infrastructure. Internally, the City launched a centralized knowledge base for staff, improving information access and support across departments.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Complete migration to the Council-approved cloud-based phone system.

B. Integrate Microsoft Teams with the new phone system for unified communications across devices and locations.

C. Monitor and evaluate public Wi-Fi performance; consider expansion to additional parks and facilities as needed.

D. Continue refinement of Council Chambers broadcasting to enhance the hybrid meeting experience.

E. Maintain and update the internal knowledge base to ensure timely access to support documentation and FAQs.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26:

Budget will support phased implementation of the new phone system and Teams integration.

All other tasks, including Wi-Fi monitoring and knowledge base maintenance, will be managed with existing IT resources and Staff time.

8. North County Transit District (NCTD) Property Planning & Coordination
Summary: The North County Transit District (NCTD) is the landowner for the property that includes the Solana Beach Train Station. This property has been explored for development over the last couple decades with a number of initiated solicitations for proposal. No development proposal is being pursued by NCTD at this time. The City continues to meet with NCTD as-needed on the planning and public agency use and/or development of the NCTD site and related public parking.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Continue to work with NCTD on any proposed future development of the property, prioritizing public agency use and/or development that ties into the existing commercial Corridor.

B. Analyze the extension of the sidewalk on the west side of North Cedros to Cliff Street.

General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
35 Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: These actions can be completed with City Staff time. If improvements along the property frontage are determined to be feasible, design and construction costs will be identified and presented to Council for consideration.

9. Business District Collaboration
Summary: The City understands the value of a strong business sector and what it can provide for the overall benefit of the community. A thriving business community provides economic value, job opportunities and entertainment options for those the live, work and play here. The City can assist the business community through many avenues, including special event collaborations, operations efficiencies and strengthening relationships with the various districts. The City is committed to working collaboratively with the businesses to enhance the vibrancy of the community, and all that live here.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Continue working with the business districts through the Business Liaison committee to strengthen the relationship between the City and business leaders.

B. Continue to look at City operational efficiencies to assist the businesses with permits and inspections.

C. Collaborate with the business districts on special events to serve the residents and bring in visitors and new business opportunities
Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY2025/26: At this time, only Staff time is anticipated to continue collaboration with the business districts. If there are joint opportunities that the City can assist with, there may be minimal costs associated.

10. Facilities/Asset Replacement Master Plan
Summary: The purpose of the facilities/asset replacement master plan was to identify costs and funding for the replacement and/or renovation of City facilities and existing assets, including buildings, parks, beach stairs, equipment, vehicles, computers, and furnishings.

The City completed a condition assessment and associated costs for all City facilities.

Starting in FY 2014/15 through FY 2024/25, Council had authorized a total of $2,371,000 for this Master Plan. The FY 2025/26 objective is to keep funding this Master Plan and completing necessary maintenance projects at City facilities.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Update City facility/asset inventory list on an annual basis and prioritize maintenance and replacement costs.

B. Continue funding Facilities Replacement Fund on an annual basis. Funding will be based on a formula applied equal to 50% of the annual depreciation value building & improvement assets for the prior fiscal year end.

General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
36 • FY 2025/26 formula-based transfer would be approximately $300k for General Fund.

C. Continue funding the Asset Replacement Fund on an annual basis based on a formula applied equal to 50% of the annual depreciation value of vehicles & equipment assets for the prior fiscal year end.
• FY 2025/26 formula-based transfer would be approximately $172k for General Fund.

D. Create a position to oversee asset management and contracts.

E. Purchase an asset management software program.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: The costs to fund facility and asset replacement are significant. Recommended transfers for FY 2025/26 Budget include, $300,155 to Facilities Replacement from General Fund Reserve for Public Facilities, and $172,390 to Asset Replacement Fund from General Fund, pending final budget adoption.

The total expenditure budget for FY 2025/26 is $556,782 for the Asset Replacement Fund and $246,573 for the Facilities Replacement Fund, pending final budget adoption.

11. Proactively Pursue Measures to Reduce CalPERS Future Liabilities
Summary: Council established a PARS Pension Trust Fund in FY 2015/16 to fund Pension liabilities and has appropriated a total of $5,629,488.20 for unfunded pension liabilities through FY 2024/25. Including contributions and investment earnings, the pension liabilities fund had an account balance of $6,987,430.88 as of March 31,2025. The purpose of the establishment of this Trust would be to pay down the CalPERS unfunded future liability quicker and provide less volatility which would lower the overall costs to the City.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Continue funding the PARS Trust Fund in FY 2025/26.

B. Consider the development of a Council Pension Funding Policy to address the City’s long-term pension obligations.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: Staff will request 35% of the fiscal year end surplus be deposited into the PARS Pension Trust Fund.

12. Proactively Pursue Measures to Reduce Other PostEmployment Benefits (OPEB) Future Liabilities Summary: Council established and is funding a PARS Post-Employment Benefits Trust Fund in FY 2015/16 to fund Other Post-Employment (Health) Benefits (OPEB) liabilities and has appropriated a total of $1,473,681 for unfunded OPEB liabilities through FY 2024/25.

Including contributions and investment earnings, the OPEB liabilities funds had an account balance of $1,993,200.02 as of March 31, 2025. The purpose of the establishment of this General Governance and Fiscal Responsibility
37 Trust would be to establish a long-term reserve to pay down the OPEB unfunded future liability quicker and provide less volatility which would lower the overall costs to the City.

Council approved as part of the FY’s, 2018/19 through 2025/26 adopted budgets an amount for the City’s OPEB obligation. These amounts were equal to the actuarially determined contribution (ADC) for the fiscal years as determined by Foster & Foster, Inc. The ADC includes annual pay-as-you-go benefit payments for retirees and PEMCHA administrative costs with the balance of the ADC being sent to the PARS Trust Fund for OPEB.

Establishing this funding mechanism in the adopted budgets resulted in a reduction in the City’s OPEB net liability by $2,750,870 from $4,454,874 in FY 2017/18, to $1,704,004 on June 30th, 2024. Staff will continue to fund an on-going budget line item equal to the ADC as determined by the OPEB actuarial valuation to address the City’s OPEB liability obligation.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Continue funding the PARS Trust Fund in future Fiscal Years pursuant to Council direction.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY 2025/26: $139,300 is included in the FY 2025/26 budget.

13. City Hall Deferred Maintenance
Summary: During FY 2024/25, two HVAC units at City Hall were replaced, including resealing the roof ducts and replacing associated duct insulation. This project was completed in April 2025. Also in FY 2024/25, the elevator modernization project began and is expected to be completed by June 2025.

FY 2025/26 Actions:

A. Asphalt repairs to parking lot. This work may include removal of trees in the small islands in the interior of the parking lot.

B. Replace two HVAC units (with heat pumps) and perform corresponding duct work.

Summary of Budgetary Projections for FY2025/26: $60,000 for City Hall AC and duct work are expected to be appropriated in FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27 Adopted Budgets.

There is $30,000 available in FY 2024/25 Adopted Budget for the parking lot repairs, that can be rolled over to FY 2025/26.

ONGOING PRIORITIES
& MONITORING
38 ONGOING PRIORITIES & MONITORING
The City has completed several integral capital projects and programs over the last fiscal year that are of priority to the City and require monitoring and/or reporting on a regular basis.

Additionally, there are a number of areas that as funding arises, or new programs, policies, or legislation are proposed, the City Council has identified a need to prioritize action and responsiveness. The following is a list of ongoing priorities for the City:

Housing and Homelessness:

A. Identify/pursue outside funding opportunities for development of lower and moderateincome housing.

B. Evaluate the potential to convert existing buildings to affordable housing.

C. Explore partnerships with developers to fund units within City-initiated housing projects, when feasible.

D. Support regional efforts and outreach to address opioid crisis, drug overdose (including prescription drugs) and homelessness problems.

Coastal and Environmental:

A. Coordinate with the City of Encinitas, USACE, and State Parks on Sand Replenishment Post-Construction Monitoring and Reporting.

B. Coordinate with SANDAG on regional shoreline monitoring, other coastal projects and Regional Beach Sand Project III.

C. Continued coordination of efforts with key parties including local, regional, State and federal regulatory and governing agencies for beach sand replenishment and retention projects as a key local sea level rise/climate change adaptation strategy.

D. Continue to identify and implement other SCOUP compatible projects in the City.

E. Monitor parking and access for Annie’s Canyon trail and update social media and other information sources to direct users to the Manchester Avenue Park and Ride.

F. Continue to reach out and educate all food generators who must comply with the requirements of SB 1383.

G. Continue to reach out and educate all businesses who must comply with the City’s Single-Use Plastics Ordinance.

H. Continue to use the latest available organic and nonchemical pesticides and eliminate any use of rodenticides in City’s Parks, rights of ways and public facilities.

I. Budget for ongoing infrastructure costs after project completion for such things as the replacement of sprinkler heads and other assorted needs.

J. Support and promote SEJPA and its efforts to develop a potable reuse program.

ONGOING PRIORITIES
& MONITORING
39 Circulation and Parking:

A. Monitor traffic and parking issues in neighborhoods related to beach and trail usage, and fairgrounds activities, as needed.

B. Explore the implementation of a circulator or alternative solution to expand mobility options for residents and visitors to move throughout the City, thereby reducing congestion and promoting sustainable solutions.

C. Prepare an annual Pavement Repair program to address City roadways requiring maintenance and repair.

D. Explore increased funding for maintenance of the Coastal Rail Trail.

E. Evaluate the development of a sidewalk installation policy.

Land Use and Planning:

A. Monitor the regional circulation and land use plans, and any specific rail projects that could impact the City residents and businesses either directly or indirectly.

B. Monitor the development proposal for the North Bluff property on Border Avenue in Del Mar.

C. Monitor Fairgrounds plans and projects.

D. Research ADU and affordable ADU incentive programs.

E. Conduct Short Term Vacation Rental (STVR) Monitoring and Compliance Review.

F. Continue to work with SDGE to advance the remaining Utilities Undergrounding Projects (UUP) toward construction.

G. Continue to seek out opportunities for a community dog park.

H. Ensure compliance with organic waste management regulations in new developments City Organizational Effectiveness
A. Conduct a Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) local hotel audit.

B. Sustain and improve the City’s records management plan to ensure efficient and effective access and retention of City records for the purpose of identifying, protecting, and preserving the official history of City actions.

C. Development of City Donation, Dedication and Memorial Policies.

D. Identify and prioritize Cybersecurity training modules and implement phishing campaigns with Staff to test and correct, if needed, response to cyber threats.

← All documents from this meeting