Agenda packet — Soledad City Council, May 21, 2025 (part 4 of 4)

749

I I - I I I I
-------i ~ ! I ""
, ':-... 11 ~
' "' \
\
\ 1
\ ....... ·,r-- \
1--r-,
I i',.._ \ -....1 ' " 1, I\
I
I lhI I I I

I I I I
~ GEOCON
.!2,P~N SULTA N T S~
CONSOLIDATION TEST - ASTM D2435

STRESS VERSUS VOID RATIO
Project Name Soledad Recycled Water
Geocon Project Number S9763-05-285
Boring Number MR-24-002
Sample Number Shelby 11 (40-42')
Sample Description Greenish Gray lean CLAY
Void Ratio

1.200

1.150

1.100

1.050

1.000

0.950

0.900

0.850

0.800
10 100 1000 10000 100000
Effective Consolidation Stress, psf
Axial Load, psf Void Ratio Axial Strain, % Measurement Initial Final initial 1.215 0.00 Height (in.) 0.750 0.654
100 1.215 0.00 Moisture Content (%) 40.4 33.8
250 1.211 0.16 Dry Density (pcf) 77.2 88.6
500 1.209 0.28 Saturation (%) 91 100
1000 1.203 0.53 Note:
2000 1.190 1.11 Gs = 2.74 (assumed)
4000 1.173 1.90
8000 1.146 3.12
16000 1.082 6.01
32000 0.968 11.15
64000 0.833 17.24 3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800
16000 0.895 14.44 Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
4000 0.950 11.96 tel. 916.852-9118 fax. 916.852.9132

Page 2 of 3 ends

750

-
- ~ .._ --i I.... '~ ... r--,
\
\
\
~ -.. ........... \ ........ --~ \ -..... .............. ' ........... \ ...... .
~~ GEOCON
1 Q_p N6ULTAN'TS~
CONSOLIDATION TEST - ASTM D2435
Void Ratio
Project Name: Soledad Recycled Water
Project Number: S9763-05-285 Sample Number: MR-24-002 Shelby 11 (40-42')

CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
JOB S9763-05-285, BORING MR-24-002, Shelby 11 (40-42')

1.200

1.150

1.100

1.050

1.000

0.950

0.900

0.850

0.800
10 100 1000 10000 100000
Log Pressure - PSF
mV, coef 50% Consolidation 90% Consolidation
Axial t50, Time CV, Coeff t90 Void Axial of vol cC, , Time CV, Coeff Load Ratio Strain Compres Comp to Consol of Consol to Consol of Consol (psf) (%) (in2/lb) Index (min) (ft2/yr) (min) (ft2/yr)
initial 1.215 0.00
100 1.215 0.00
250 1.211 0.16 0.0016 0.009 0.02 4325.07 0.10 4350.05
500 1.209 0.28 0.0007 0.008 0.03 3521.38 0.12 3541.72
1000 1.203 0.53 0.0007 0.018 0.03 3035.15 0.14 3052.68
2000 1.190 1.11 0.0008 0.043 0.41 242.06 1.76 243.46
4000 1.173 1.90 0.0006 0.058 0.32 310.02 1.36 311.81
8000 1.146 3.12 0.0004 0.089 0.22 442.05 0.93 444.60
16000 1.082 6.01 0.0005 0.213 0.93 99.16 3.98 99.73
32000 0.968 11.15 0.0005 0.378 2.41 35.07 10.33 35.27
64000 0.833 17.24 0.0003 0.448 5.46 13.64 23.39 13.72
16000 0.895 14.44
4000 0.950 11.96
Gs = 2.74 COND AT COND AT
(assumed) START END

OF TEST OF TEST
HEIGHT (in.) 0.7500 0.6537
MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 40.4 33.8 3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800 DRY DENSITY (pcf): 77.2 88.6 Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
SATURATION (%) 91.1 99.7 tel. 916.852-9118 fax. 916.852.9132 Page 3 of 3 751
I I I I I II II ' r<: ' I I I II
I I I I I I I I I I "'I I I I
I I I I I II II I I i\ I I II
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1, 1, I I I \ I I 1, I I I I I II 11 I I I \! 11

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II I I I II
I I I I I I I I I I I 1\ I I I I I I II II I I I I II

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11<

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !lo.

I I I I I II II I I I I I II t: N: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '" I I I I I II II I I I I I II ~Ir"'- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - -c,

I I I I I II II I I I I I II I I I I I I' I' I I I I I I'

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II I I I I I II I
I
Particle Size Distribution Report

PERCENT FINER
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
GRAIN SIZE - mm.
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
% +3" Coarse
% Gravel
Fine Coarse Medium
% Sand
Fine Silt
% Fines
Clay

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 44.4 36.8 16.4 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #4#10 #20 #30 #40 #60 #100 #140 #200

TEST RESULTS
Opening Percent Spec.* Pass?
Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail)
Material Description
Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318)
Classification
Coefficients
Date Received: Date Tested:

Tested By:

Checked By:

Title:

Sample Number: A-21-003-4A Depth: 6.5-7.0 Date Sampled:

Client:

Project:

Project No: Figure
#10
#20
#40
#60
#100
#200

0.0327 mm.

0.0209 mm.

0.0123 mm.

0.0088 mm.

0.0063 mm.

0.0031 mm.

0.0013 mm.
100.0

99.3 97.6

88.5 74.0

53.2 27.9

25.2 21.1

19.7 17.0

15.5 14.2

0.2659 0.2184 0.0927

0.0684 0.0368 0.0020
6/4/24
JF
MR
Lab Manager
Crawford and Associates
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance
S9763-05-285
PL= LL= PI=
USCS (D 2487)= AASHTO (M 145)=
D90= D85= D60=
D50= D30= D15=
D10= Cu = Cc =
Remarks
* (no specification provided)
GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.
752
Sunland Analytical
11419 Sunrise Gold Circle,# 1 O
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
(916) 852-8557
Date Reported 06/05/2024
Date Submitted 05/31/2024
To: Carmelo Pagan
Crawford & Associates, Inc.
4701 Freeport Blvd
Sacramento, CA 95822
From: Gene Oliphant, Ph.D. \ Randy Horney.,......-) \
General Manager \ Lab Manager·,~\-\
The reported analysis was requested for the following location:

Location 24-1057.1 Site ID: A-24-005 3B.

Thank you for your business.
* For future reference to this analysis please use SUN# 92349-191324.

EVALUATION FOR SOIL CORROSION
Soil pH 7.61
Moisture 6.8 %
Minimum Resistivity 3.75 ohm-cm (xl000)
Chloride 6.2 ppm 00.00062 %
Sulfate 18.9 ppm 00.00189 %
Redox Potential (+) 290 mv
Sulfides Presence - NEGATIVE

METHODS
pH and Min.Resistivity CA DOT Test #643 Mod. (Sm.Cell)
Sulfate CA DOT Test #417, Chloride CA DOT Test #422m
Redox Potential ASTM G-200m, Sulfides AWWA C105/A25.5
753
Sunland Analytical
114 I 9 Sunrise Gold Circle, #IO
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
(916) 852-8557
Date Reported 06/05/2024
Date Submitted 05/31/2024
To: Carmelo Pagan
Crawford & Associates, Inc.
4701 Freeport Blvd
Sacramento, CA 95822
From: Gene Oliphant, Ph.D. \ Randy Horney~
General Manager \ Lab Manager\
The reported analysis was requested for the following location:

Location 24-1057.1 Site ID: A-24-004 3B.

Thank you for your business.
* For future reference to this analysis please use SUN# 92349-191325.

EVALUATION FOR SOIL CORROSION
Soil pH 8.12
Moisture 10.4 %
Minimum Resistivity 0.60 ohm-cm (xlO00)
Chloride 131. 0 ppm 00.01310 %
Sulfate 196.7 ppm 00.01967 %
Redox Potential (+) 261 mv
Sulfides Presence - NEGATIVE

METHODS
pH and Min.Resistivity CA DOT Test #643 Mod. (Sm.Cell)
Sulfate CA DOT Test #417, Chloride CA DOT Test #422m
Redox Potential ASTM G-200m, Sulfides AWWA Cl05/A25.5
754
Sunland Analytical
11419 Sunrise Gold Circle,# IO
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
(916) 852-8557
Date Reported 06/05/2024
Date Submitted 05/31/2024
To: Carmelo Pagan
Crawford & Associates, Inc.
4701 Freeport Blvd
Sacramento, CA 95822
From: Gene Oliphant, Ph.D. \ Randy Horney<Z-..r"
General Manager \ Lab Manager\
The reported analysis was requested for the following location:

Location 24-1057.1 Site ID: A-24-006 3B.

Thank you for your business.
* For future reference to this analysis please use SUN# 92349-191326.

EVALUATION FOR SOIL CORROSION
Soil pH 7.02
Moisture 6.3 %
Minimum Resistivity 0.91 ohm-cm (xl000)
Chloride 22.5 ppm 00.00225 %
Sulfate 80.3 ppm 00.00803 %
Redox Potential (+) 28 mv
Sulfides Presence - NEGATIVE

METHODS
pH and Min.Resistivity CA DOT Test #643 Mod. (Sm.Cell)
Sulfate CA DOT Test #417, Chloride CA DOT Test #422m
Redox Potential ASTM G-200m, Sulfides AWWA Cl05/A25.5
755
Sunland Analytical
11419 Sunrise Gold Circle, #10
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
(916) 852-8557
Date Reported 06/05/2024
Date Submitted 05/31/2024
To: Carmelo Pagan
Crawford & Associates, Inc.
4701 Freeport Blvd
Sacramento, CA 95822
From: Gene Oliphant, Ph.D. \ Randy Horney(2..l~
General Manager \ Lab Manager\
The reported analysis was requested for the following location:

Location 24-1057.1 Site ID: MK-24-002 7B.

Thank you for your business.
* For future reference to this analysis please use SUN# 92349-191327.

EVALUATION FOR SOIL CORROSION
Soil pH 7.100
Moisture 30.9 %
Minimum Resistivity 0.54 ohm-cm (xl0O0)
Chloride 62.5 ppm 00.00625 %
Sulfate 177.5 ppm 00.01775 %
Redox Potential (+) 223 mv
Sulfides Presence - NEGATIVE

METHODS
pH and Min.Resistivity CA DOT Test #643 Mod. (Sm.Cell)
Sulfate CA DOT Test #417, Chloride CA DOT Test #422m
Redox Potential ASTM G-200m, Sulfides AWWA Cl05/A25.5
756

Crawford
& Associates, 1nc_----------------------------------- Geatechnics1 Ei:,gineeri17g, Design end construcaon services DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Crawford
Recycled Water Conveyance Project File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024

APPENDIX V
Site Specific Analysis
757

Crawford
& Associates, 1nc_----------------------------------- Geocechnics1 Ef)gineering. Design and conscruct1on services

SITE SPECIFIC ANALYSIS
The following sections describe the site-specific ground motion analysis performed in accordance with ASCE 7-16 (and supplements) and 2022 CBC.

INITIAL SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS

SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA
Seismic design criteria are included in Section 11 of ASCE 7-16 (Sections referenced hereafter refer to ASCE 7-16), including mapped acceleration parameters. These mapped parameters are available online through the SEAOC/OSHPD2 Seismic Design website, which interpolates values form the ASCE 7-16 maps using the site location.

SITE CLASS AND RISK CATEGORY
The encountered subsurface soils during Crawford’s 2024 exploration indicate a Site Class D.

However, the 2024 borings show potentially liquefiable soils present at the proposed pump station site. Liquefiable soils are considered Site Class F per Section 20.3.1 of ASCE 7-16 and a sitespecific site response is required, unless the structures have fundamental periods of vibration equal or less than 0.5s. We assume the proposed pump station will have a fundamental period of

0.5 seconds or less. According to the Exception in Section 20.3.1 of ASCE 7-16, “a site class is permitted to be determined in accordance with Section 20.3 and the corresponding values of Fa and Fv are determined from Table 11.4-1 and 11.4-2.”; therefore, the soils are considered Site Class D for the site-specific ground motion hazard analysis.

The average shear wave velocity of 195 meters per second (m/s) in the upper 30 meters or 100 feet (VS30) used for the site was developed from 2024 boring data. Crawford used correlations1 with SPT blow count N-values (Burmister2
) corrected for hammer efficiency to determine VS
values. The Risk Category for the structure was assumed to be III.

MAPPED ACCELERATION PARAMETERS
Crawford accessed the SEAOC/OSHPD Seismic Design Map website3 considering the site location latitude 36.4205°N and longitude -121.3402°, Site Class D, and Risk Category III to determine the Mapped Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) Spectral Response Short Period (SS), Mapped MCE Spectral Response at 1 second period (S1), Long Period (TL), and mapped risked coefficients (CRS and CR1). The SS, S1, TL, CRS, and CR1 are coordinate specific and are 1 Empirical Correlations for Estimating Shear Wave Velocity, Caltrans Geotechnical Manual, Design Acceleration Response Spectrum, Attachment 2, January 2021.
2 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Section 10.4.6.2.4, 8th Edition, 2018 and Burmister's Energy-Area Correction for Sampler Size Conversions to SPT N-value. 3 https://www.seismicmaps.org/
1 758

Crawford
& Associates, 1nc_----------------------------------- Geocechnics1 Ef)gineering. Design and conscruct1on services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 11, 2024
taken from ASCE 7-16 figures independently of site class. The mapped acceleration parameters are based on an MCE which is roughly equivalent to an earthquake with a 2% chance of exceedance in 50 years (2,475-year return period). Table 1 summarizes the mapped acceleration parameters.

Table 1: Mapped Acceleration Parameters
Mapped Acceleration Parameter Value Source
Mapped MCER Spectral Response Short Period (SS) 1.591 Figure 21-1 Mapped MCER Spectral Response at 1 Second Period (S1) 0.566 Figure 21-2 Long Period (TL) 12 Figure 21-14
Mapped Risk Coefficient at Short Period (CRS) 0.982 Figure 22-17 Mapped Risk Coefficient at 1 Second Period (CR1) 0.946 Figure 22-18

HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION HAZARD ANALYSIS
A ground motion hazard analysis accounts for the regional tectonic setting, geology, and seismicity of a specific site as well as the expected recurrence of the maximum magnitudes of the earthquakes on known faults and source zones, considering ground motion attenuation and near source effects. The methodology included in ASCE 7-16 was used to determine the site-specific ground motions of the project site, generally consisting of the following steps:
• Determine the probabilistic MCE ground motions
• Determine the deterministic MCE ground motions
• Adjust probabilistic MCE ground motions to risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake ground motions (MCER)
• Compare and scale the site-specific deterministic MCE ground motion with minimum spectral responses to ASCE 7-16 Supplement 1 Section 21.2.2 • Compare the scaled deterministic ground motion to the probabilistic ground motion to determine the site-specific MCER ground motion (lower of the two at each period) • Calculate design spectral response ground motion (2/3 of MCER) • Compare the Section 21.2 design spectral response ground motion to the Section 11.4.6 design spectral response ground motion (cannot be lower than 80% Section 11.4.6 design spectral response ground motion)
• Determine the design spectral response spectrum and design acceleration parameters • Calculate peak ground acceleration (PGAM)

GROUND MOTION HAZARD ANALYSIS
Crawford performed a seismic hazard analyses and site response analyses using EZ-FRISK software Version 8.10. Crawford used the following next generation attenuation (NGA) relationships all equally weighted for the nearby strike-slip, normal, and reverse faults:
• Abrahamson-et al (2014)
• Boore-et al (2014)
2 759

Crawford
& Associates, 1nc_----------------------------------- Geocechnics1 Ef)gineering. Design and conscruct1on services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 11, 2024
• Campbell and Bozorgnia (2014)
• Chiou and Youngs (2014)
The following parameters were common to all analyses for each of the attenuation relationships:
• The VS30 of the site of 195 m/s
• Depth to soil with a VS of 1,000 m/s was calculated to be 763 meters based on the methodology proposed by Abrahamson and Silva (2008)
• Depth to soil with a VS of 2,500 m/s was calculated to be 3.26 kilometers based on the methodology proposed by Campbell and Bozorgnia (2008)

PROBABILISTIC MCER GROUND MOTION
Seismic sources within 300 kilometers were used to determine the site-specific ground motions.

The NGA analyses considered the faults in Table 2: Summary of Seismic Sources (See page 7).

EZ-FRISK software was used to determine geometric mean spectral response acceleration predicted using attenuation relationships from a 5% damped response spectrum with a 2% in 50- year exceedance probability. Crawford included directivity factors following Huang, Whittaker, and Luco (2008) to apply the maximum rotated component.

RISK COEFFICIENTS
Method 1 of Section 21.2 was used to determine the probabilistic MCER ground motion Mapped risk coefficients (CRS and CR1) were used to adjust the response accelerations to a 1% chance of collapse in 50 years per Section 21.2.1.1. The risk coefficients are summarized in Table 1, along with the source figure from ASCE 7-16.

CRS was applied to accelerations at spectral periods less than or equal to 0.2 seconds. CR1 was applied accelerations at spectral periods greater than or equal to 1 second. For spectral periods between 0.2 and 1 seconds, the CR value was linearly interpolated.

PROBABILISTIC MCER GROUND MOTION
Figure 1 shows the maximum rotated spectral response for the 2% in 50-year event developed using EZ-FRISK for each of the attenuation relationships described above. Also shown is the risk-adjusted response spectrum adjusting the response to a 1% in 50-year probability of collapse, which is equivalent to the site-specific probabilistic ground motion MCER.

DETERMINISTIC MCER GROUND MOTION
The deterministic spectral response acceleration is defined as the 84th-percentile 5% damped spectral response in the direction of maximum horizontal response for the characteristic earthquake on all known active faults within the region. EZ-FRISK was used to calculate the deterministic ground motion per Section 21.2.2. The deterministic spectral response was taken as the largest amplitude of ground motion considering all sources using the weighted mean of NGA attenuation relationships stated above. The controlling seismic source for the project site is the Great Valley 10 (Panoche) fault from spectral periods of 0 to 1 seconds and Reliz 2011 CFM for spectral periods greater than 1 seconds. Figure 2 shows the 84th-percentile 5% damped spectral response for the NGA attenuation relationships. 3 760

Crawford
& Associates, 1nc_----------------------------------- Geocechnics1 Ef)gineering. Design and conscruct1on services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 11, 2024

DETERMINISTIC MCER GROUND MOTION SCALING
Per ASCE 7-16 Supplement 1 Section 21.2.2, the maximum deterministic spectral response was compared with the minimum peak acceleration of 1.5Fa with Fa = 1 for Site Class D. Our maximum spectral response was 2.26g, therefore, no scaling of the deterministic curve was required. Figure 2 shows our deterministic ground motions compared to the minimum peak spectral accelerations.

SITE-SPECIFIC SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION MCER
The site-specific spectral response acceleration is defined as the lower of the probabilistic and deterministic ground motions in Section 21.2.3. For the project site, the probabilistic ground motion controls for at PGA and 0.3 to 10 seconds. The deterministic ground motion controls for periods between 0.05 to 0.2 seconds. The site-specific spectral response acceleration (MCER) is shown on Figure 3.

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM
The design response spectrum is defined in Section 21.3 as the higher of two values:
● Two-thirds of the site-specific design spectral response acceleration per Section 21.2 ● 80% of the design spectral response acceleration per Section 11.4.6 where Fa is calculated in Table 11.4-1 and Fv = 2.5 for S1 > 0.2 for Site Class D Crawford first calculated the design spectral response acceleration by taking 2/3 of the sitespecific response acceleration MCER as shown in Figure 4.

Crawford then calculated the design response accelerations per Section 11.4.6 using Fa = 1.0 and Fv = 2.5 and reduced the spectral accelerations 80% to determine the design accelerations for a Site Class D. We then compared Section 11.4.6 design spectral accelerations for Site Class D with our site-specific design spectral response accelerations (Figure 5). The site-specific design spectral response acceleration per Section 21.2 controlled for all periods.

The design response spectrum is shown on Figure 5 and Table 3.

Table 3: Design Response Spectrum
Period, s Sa, g
PGA 0.54

0.05 0.56

0.1 0.76

0.2 0.98

0.3 1.04

0.4 1.35

0.5 1.37

0.6 1.35
4 761

Crawford
& Associates, 1nc_----------------------------------- Geocechnics1 Ef)gineering. Design and conscruct1on services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 11, 2024
Period, s Sa, g

0.7 1.26

0.8 1.17

0.9 1.10

1.0 1.04

2.0 1.03

3.0 0.98

4.0 0.70

5.0 0.53

6.0 0.42

7.0 0.32

8.0 0.25

9.0 0.20

10.0 0.17

DESIGN ACCELERATION PARAMETERS
Design acceleration parameters were calculated in accordance with Section 21.4. The SDS value was taken as 90% the peak spectral acceleration value from periods 0.2 to 5 seconds. The SD1 value was taken as the maximum product of T*Sa (period * spectral acceleration) from periods 1 to 5 seconds. Per Section 21.4, the SDS and SD1 values cannot be less than 80% of the SDS and SD1 calculated from Section 11.4.5. The SDS and SD1 values in Section 11.4.5 was calculated from using Fa = 1.0 and Fv = 4.0 for a Site Class D as given in Section 21.3.

SMS and SM1 were calculated as 1.5 times SDS and SD1, respectively. Per Section 21.4, the SMS and SM1 values cannot be less than 80% of the SMS and SM1 calculated from Section 11.4.3. The SMS and SM1 values in Section 11.4.3 was calculated from using Fa = 1.0 and Fv = 2.5 for a Site Class D as given in Section 21.3
The design acceleration parameters are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4: Horizontal Site-Specific Spectral Accelerations Design Acceleration Parameter Value (g)
Design Spectral Acceleration for Short Period (SDS) 1.24 Design Spectral Acceleration for 1 Second Period (SD1) 1.67 MCE Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Period (SMS) 1.86 MCE Spectral Response Acceleration for 1 Second Period
(SM1) 2.50
5 762

Crawford
& Associates, 1nc_----------------------------------- Geocechnics1 Ef)gineering. Design and conscruct1on services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 11, 2024

MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE MCEG PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION (PGA)

PROBABILISTIC MCEG PGA
Per Section 21.5.1 the probabilistic geometric mean PGA shall be taken as geometric mean peak ground acceleration with a 2% probability of exceedance within a 50-year period. The probabilistic MCEG PGA is 0.83g.

DETERMINISTIC MCEG PGA
Per Section 21.5.2, the deterministic geometric mean PGA shall be taken as the largest 84thpercentile geometric mean peak PGA but not lower than 0.5*FPGA where FPGA is determined using ASCE 7-16 Table 11.8-1 and PGA is taken as 0.5g. The deterministic MCEG PGA was taken as

0.86g.

SITE-SPECIFIC MCEG PGA
The site-specific MCEG PGA (PGAM) taken as the lesser of the probabilistic MCEG PGA and deterministic MCEG PGA but not less than 80% of the PGAM determined from Equation 11.8-1 in ASCE 7-16. The site-specific PGAM was taken as 0.83g.
6 763

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024
TABLE 2
Table 2: Summary of Seismic Sources
Attenuation
Relationship
Type
Source
Closest
Distance (km)
Maximum
Magnitude
Mechanism
Dip Angle
(degree)
Dips
Direction
Site Lies
NGA
Carson Range fault [1285] 283.94 7.08 Normal 35-65 E SW Carson Range-Kings Canyon fault
[1285_1654] 283.94 7.23 Normal 35-65 E SW
Huntoon Valley fault system [1302] 291.98 6.9 Strike Slip 90 -- SW Smith Valley fault [1291abc] 288.35 7.4 Normal 35-65 E SW Unnamed faults [1303] 296.33 6.9 Strike Slip 90 -- SW
FM31-Antelope Valley 2011 281.69 7.0 Normal 50 E SW
FM31-Bennett Valley 2011 CFM 224.06 7.6 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM31-Big Pine (Central) 264.83 8.0 SS|R 76 SE,S NW
FM31-Big Pine (East) 264.53 8.0 SS|R 73 NW,N NW
FM31-Big Pine (West) 237.19 7.4 Reverse 50 N NW
FM31-Breckenridge 2011 273.54 7.2 N|SS 60 E NW
FM31-Butano 2011 CFM 93.85 8.1 SS|R 70 N,NE SE
FM31-Calaveras (Central) 2011 CFM 72.56 7.8 Strike Slip 77 NE S FM31-Calaveras (No) 2011 CFM 122.72 7.5 Strike Slip 80 SW,W S NGA
FM31-Calaveras (So) - Paicines extension
2011 CFM 25.09 7.9 Strike Slip 77 SW S
FM31-Calaveras (So) 2011 CFM 46.89 7.9 Strike Slip 85 NE,E S FM31-Casmalia 2011 CFM 168.24 8.0 Reverse 75 S,SW N
FM31-Channel Islands Western Deep
Ramp 272.37 7.8 SS|R 21 S,SW NW
FM31-Clayton 166.28 7.7 SS|R 90 -- S
FM31-Collayami 2011 CFM 277.84 6.7 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM31-Concord 2011 CFM 174.21 7.8 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM31-Contra Costa (Lafayette) 2011 CFM 172.44 7.3 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM31-Contra Costa Shear Zone
(connector) 2011 CFM 178.72 7.3 Strike Slip 81 SW,W S
FM31-East Huasna 2011 CFM 146.04 7.2 Strike Slip 90 -- NW FM31-Fish Slough 2011 CFM 273.92 7.3 N|SS 60 W SW
FM31-Franklin 2011 CFM 170.21 7.3 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM31-Garlock (West) 281.70 8.2 Strike Slip 90 -- NW
1 764

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024 Attenuation Relationship Type Source Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude Mechanism Dip Angle (degree) Dips Direction Site Lies FM31-Great Valley 03 Mysterious Ridge 257.22 7.4 Reverse 16-20 SW,W S FM31-Great Valley 03a Dunnigan Hills 250.16 6.5 Reverse 20 NE,E S FM31-Great Valley 04a Trout Creek 237.93 7.4 Reverse 20 SW SE FM31-Great Valley 04b Gordon Valley 212.18 7.5 Reverse 20 SW,W S FM31-Great Valley 05 Pittsburg - Kirby Hills
alt1 182.58 6.5 Strike Slip 55 E S
FM31-Great Valley 06 (Midland) 2011 CFM
alt1 161.64 7.3 Reverse 47 SW,W S
FM31-Great Valley 07 (Orestimba) 79.16 6.9 Reverse 20 SW S FM31-Great Valley 08 (Quinto) 63.15 6.8 SS|R 25 SW S
FM31-Great Valley 09 (Laguna Seca) 48.68 6.6 Reverse 25 SW S FM31-Great Valley 10 (Panoche) 17.00 7.6 Reverse 15-24 SW SW FM31-Great Valley 11 33.67 7.5 Reverse 15-16 SW W
FM31-Great Valley 12 36.87 7.4 Reverse 15-17 SW W
FM31-Great Valley 13 (Coalinga) 68.04 7.4 Reverse 15-19 SW NW FM31-Great Valley 14 (Kettleman Hills) 107.41 7.0 Reverse 22 SW NW FM31-Green Valley 2011 CFM 192.20 7.9 Strike Slip 84 W S FM31-Greenville (No) 2011 CFM 122.20 7.8 SS|R 84 NE S
FM31-Greenville (So) 2011 CFM 93.39 7.8 Strike Slip 87 E S NGA
FM31-Hartley Springs 2011 CFM 249.04 7.4 Normal 50 NE,E SW FM31-Hayward (No) 2011 CFM 168.60 7.7 Strike Slip 82 NE,E SE FM31-Hayward (So) 2011 CFM 116.12 7.8 Strike Slip 76 NE S FM31-Hayward (So) extension 2011 CFM 95.58 7.8 Strike Slip 48 NE,E S FM31-Hilton Creek 2011 CFM 258.39 7.3 Normal 50 NE SW
FM31-Hosgri 45.46 8.0 SS|R 80 NE,E N
FM31-Hosgri (Extension) 182.11 6.5 Strike Slip 80 E N
FM31-Hunting Creek - Bartlett Springs
connector 2011 266.97 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM31-Hunting Creek - Berryessa 2011
CFM 235.00 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM31-Independence rev 2011 272.22 7.8 N|SS 50 NE,E W
FM31-Kern Canyon (Lake Isabella) 2011 272.38 7.3 N|SS 60 E W FM31-Kern Canyon (North Kern) 2011 262.30 7.7 Normal 60 E W FM31-Kern Canyon (South Kern) 2011 262.72 7.7 Normal 60 E W FM31-La Panza 2011 126.19 7.3 Strike Slip 51 NE NW
2 765

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024 Attenuation Relationship Type Source Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude Mechanism Dip Angle (degree) Dips Direction Site Lies FM31-Lake Isabella (Seismicity) 273.44 7.1 Strike Slip 90 -- W FM31-Las Positas 138.45 6.4 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM31-Lions Head 2011 CFM 175.76 7.8 Reverse 75 N,NE NW
FM31-Los Alamos 2011 CFM 207.38 8.1 SS|R 30 S,SW NW
FM31-Los Alamos extension 229.33 8.0 SS|R 30 S,SW NW
FM31-Los Medanos - Roe Island 181.68 7.8 SS|R 39 NE S
FM31-Los Osos 2011 122.48 7.8 Reverse 45 S,SW N
FM31-Lost Hills 137.05 6.8 Reverse 29 SW NW
FM31-Maacama 2011 CFM 258.26 7.6 Strike Slip 63 NE SE
FM31-Mission (connected) 2011 CFM 122.68 7.5 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM31-Mission Ridge-Arroyo Parida-Santa
Ana 257.13 8.1 SS|R 70 SE,S NW
FM31-Mono Lake 2011 CFM 261.29 6.6 Normal 50 NE,E SW
FM31-Monte Vista - Shannon 2011 CFM 88.25 8.1 SS|R 61 S,SW SE FM31-Monterey Bay-Tularcitos 16.19 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- NE FM31-Morales (East) 209.93 6.5 Reverse 32 N NW
FM31-Morales (West) 189.58 6.8 Reverse 32 NE NW
FM31-Mount Diablo Thrust North CFM 159.39 7.8 SS|R 40 NE S NGA
FM31-Mount Diablo Thrust South 151.69 7.8 SS|R 40 NE S
FM31-Oceanic - West Huasna 78.04 7.4 SS|R 58 NE,E NW
FM31-Ortigalita (North) 69.80 6.8 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM31-Ortigalita (South) 51.51 7.2 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM31-Owens Valley 282.71 7.8 N|SS 90 -- W
FM31-Owens Valley Keough Hot Springs 278.81 7.8 N|SS 50-86 NE,E W FM31-Ozena 225.85 7.6 Reverse 33 S,SW NW
FM31-Pilarcitos 2011 CFM 123.15 8.0 SS|R 81 NE SE
FM31-Pine Mtn 251.63 7.7 SS|R 45 N,NE,N NW
FM31-Pitas Point (Lower West) 124.61 8.1 Reverse 13 N NW FM31-Pitas Point (Lower)-Montalvo 195.69 8.0 Reverse 16 N NW FM31-Pleito 247.26 8.1 SS|R 46 SE,S,S
W NW
FM31-Point Reyes 2011 CFM 213.16 7.0 Reverse 53 N,NE,E SE FM31-Point Reyes 2011 connector 178.74 8.0 SS|R 53 NE SE FM31-Quien Sabe 2011 CFM 38.92 7.6 Strike Slip 85 SW S
FM31-Red Mountain 227.41 8.0 Reverse 56 N NW
3 766

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024 Attenuation Relationship Type Source Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude Mechanism Dip Angle (degree) Dips Direction Site Lies FM31-Reliz 2011 CFM 6.33 8.1 Strike Slip 58 SW SE
FM31-Rinconada 2011 CFM 24.90 7.6 Strike Slip 82 SW,W N FM31-Robinson Creek 267.59 6.5 Normal 50 SE SW
FM31-Rodgers Creek - Healdsburg 2011
CFM 217.10 7.6 Strike Slip 77 NE SE
FM31-Round Valley 259.19 7.2 Normal 50 NE,E W
FM31-San Andreas (Big Bend) 239.80 8.1 SS|R 90 -- NW
FM31-San Andreas (Carrizo) rev 180.96 8.1 SS|R 90 -- NW FM31-San Andreas (Cholame) rev 119.36 8.2 Strike Slip 90 -- NW FM31-San Andreas (Creeping Section)
2011 CFM 22.97 8.4 Strike Slip 90 -- NW
FM31-San Andreas (Mojave N) 284.82 8.0 Strike Slip 90 -- NW FM31-San Andreas (North Coast) 2011
CFM 201.69 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- SE
FM31-San Andreas (Parkfield) 83.90 8.2 Strike Slip 90 -- NW FM31-San Andreas (Peninsula) 2011 CFM 102.48 8.0 SS|R 90 -- SE FM31-San Andreas (Santa Cruz Mts) 2011
CFM 44.08 8.1 Strike Slip 79 SW SE
FM31-San Cayetano 283.03 8.1 SS|R 42 N NW
FM31-San Gabriel 292.70 7.7 Strike Slip 61 NE NW
FM31-San Gregorio (North) 2011 CFM 89.04 8.0 SS|R 90 -- SE NGA
FM31-San Gregorio (South) 2011 CFM 41.69 8.2 Strike Slip 75 NE,E NE FM31-San Juan 111.48 7.4 SS|R 90 -- NW
FM31-San Luis Range - Oceano 2011 CFM 150.21 7.8 Reverse 45 NE NW FM31-San Luis Range - Pecho 2011 CFM 142.45 6.6 Reverse 90 -- N FM31-San Luis Range 2011 CFM 136.28 7.8 SS|R 52 NE NW
FM31-Santa Cruz Island 288.11 8.0 SS|R 90 -- NW
FM31-Santa Rosa Island 277.21 7.9 SS|R 90 -- NW
FM31-Santa Ynez (East) 263.76 7.7 SS|R 70 S NW
FM31-Santa Ynez (West) 226.09 8.0 SS|R 70 S,SW N
FM31-Santa Ynez River 205.76 8.0 SS|R 70 S,SW N
FM31-Sargent 2011 CFM 50.44 8.1 SS|R 90 -- SE
FM31-Shoreline 134.42 7.8 SS|R 90 -- N
FM31-Sierra Nevada (No Extension) 291.47 7.7 N|SS 50 E W FM31-Silver Creek 2011 CFM 87.86 7.8 Strike Slip 75 NE,E S 4 767

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024 Attenuation Relationship Type Source Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude Mechanism Dip Angle (degree) Dips Direction Site Lies FM31-Sisar 293.99 8.1 SS|R 29 S NW
FM31-South Cuyama 158.91 7.9 Reverse 33 S,SW NW
FM31-Swain Ravine - Spenceville 258.33 7.4 Normal 60 NE,E S FM31-Ventura-Pitas Point 275.15 8.0 SS|R 64 N,NW,
N NW
FM31-West Napa 2011 CFM 209.55 7.0 Strike Slip 75 SW,W SE FM31-West Tahoe 284.73 7.3 Normal 50 E SW
FM31-White Mountains 288.92 7.4 Strike Slip 90 -- W
FM31-White Wolf 261.67 7.5 Strike Slip 75 SE NW
FM31-White Wolf (Extension) 283.19 7.1 Strike Slip 75 SE NW FM31-Zayante-Vergeles 2011 CFM 26.17 8.2 Strike Slip 30 S,SW SE FM32-Antelope Valley 2011 281.69 7 Normal 50 E SW
FM32-Bennett Valley 2011 CFM 224.06 7.6 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM32-Big Pine (Central) 264.83 8 SS|R 76 SE,S NW
FM32-Big Pine (East) 264.53 8 SS|R 73 NW,N NW
FM32-Big Pine (West) 237.19 7.4 Reverse 50 N NW
FM32-Breckenridge 2011 273.54 7.2 N|SS 60 E NW
FM32-Butano 2011 CFM 93.85 8.1 SS|R 70 N,NE SE
FM32-Calaveras (Central) 2011 CFM 72.54 7.9 Strike Slip 77 NE S FM32-Calaveras (No) 2011 CFM 122.72 7.4 Strike Slip 80 SW,W S FM32-Calaveras (So) - Paicines extension
2011 CFM 25.09 7.9 Strike Slip 77 SW S
FM32-Calaveras (So) 2011 CFM 46.89 7.9 Strike Slip 85 NE,E S FM32-Casmalia 2011 CFM 168.25 7.8 SS|R 75 S,SW N
FM32-Channel Islands Western Deep
Ramp 272.75 8.0 SS|R 21 S,SW NW
FM32-Clayton 166.28 7.7 SS|R 90 -- S
FM32-Collayami 2011 CFM 277.84 6.7 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM32-Concord 2011 CFM 174.21 7.8 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM32-Contra Costa (Briones) 2011 CFM 181.83 7.2 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM32-Contra Costa (Dillon Point) 2011
CFM 191.69 7.1 Strike Slip 90 -- SE
FM32-Contra Costa (Lafayette) 2011 CFM 172.44 7.3 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM32-Contra Costa (Lake Chabot) 2011
CFM 203.58 7.0 Strike Slip 90 -- S
5 768

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024 Attenuation Relationship Type Source Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude Mechanism Dip Angle (degree) Dips Direction Site Lies FM32-Contra Costa (Larkey) 2011 CFM 172.21 7.3 Strike Slip 90 -- S FM32-Contra Costa (Ozal - Columbus)
2011 CFM 192.58 7.1 Strike Slip 90 -- SE
FM32-Contra Costa (Reliez Valley) 2011
CFM 175.83 7.3 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM32-Contra Costa (Southampton) 2011
CFM 181.29 7.2 Strike Slip 80 SW S
FM32-Contra Costa (Vallejo) 2011 CFM 201.39 7.0 Strike Slip 77 SW SE FM32-East Huasna 2011 CFM 146.04 7.9 SS|R 90 -- NW
FM32-Fish Slough 2011 CFM 273.92 7.3 N|SS 60 W SW
FM32-Franklin 2011 CFM 170.21 7.3 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM32-Garlock (West) 281.70 8.2 Strike Slip 90 -- NW
FM32-Great Valley 03 Mysterious Ridge 257.22 7.4 Reverse 16-20 SW,W S FM32-Great Valley 03a Dunnigan Hills 250.16 6.5 Reverse 20 NE,E S FM32-Great Valley 04a Trout Creek 237.93 7.4 Reverse 20 SW SE FM32-Great Valley 04b Gordon Valley 212.18 7.5 Reverse 20 SW,W S FM32-Great Valley 05 Pittsburg Kirby Hills
alt2 182.45 7.6 Reverse 36-90 W S
FM32-Great Valley 06 Midland alt2 163.31 7.7 SS|R 30 W S FM32-Great Valley 07 (Orestimba) 79.16 6.9 Reverse 20 SW S FM32-Great Valley 08 (Quinto) 63.15 6.8 SS|R 25 SW S
FM32-Great Valley 09 (Laguna Seca) 48.68 6.6 Reverse 25 SW S FM32-Great Valley 10 (Panoche) 17.00 7.6 Reverse 15-24 SW SW FM32-Great Valley 11 33.67 7.5 Reverse 15-16 SW W
FM32-Great Valley 12 36.87 7.4 Reverse 15-17 SW W
FM32-Great Valley 13 (Coalinga) 68.04 7.4 Reverse 15-19 SW NW FM32-Great Valley 14 (Kettleman Hills) 107.41 7.0 Reverse 22 SW NW FM32-Green Valley 2011 CFM 192.20 7.9 Strike Slip 84 W S FM32-Greenville (No) 2011 CFM 122.25 7.8 SS|R 84 NE S
FM32-Greenville (So) 2011 CFM 93.39 7.8 SS|R 87 E S
FM32-Hartley Springs 2011 CFM 249.04 7.4 Normal 50 NE,E SW FM32-Hayward (No) 2011 CFM 168.60 7.7 Strike Slip 82 NE,E SE FM32-Hayward (So) 2011 CFM 116.12 7.8 Strike Slip 76 NE S FM32-Hayward (So) extension 2011 CFM 95.58 7.8 Strike Slip 48 NE,E S FM32-Hilton Creek 2011 CFM 258.39 7.3 Normal 50 NE SW
6 769

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024 Attenuation Relationship Type Source Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude Mechanism Dip Angle (degree) Dips Direction Site Lies FM32-Hosgri 45.46 7.9 SS|R 80 NE,E N
FM32-Hosgri (Extension) 182.11 6.5 Strike Slip 80 E N
FM32-Hunting Creek - Bartlett Springs
connector 2011 266.97 8.0 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM32-Hunting Creek - Berryessa 2011
CFM 235.00 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM32-Independence rev 2011 272.22 7.8 N|SS 50 NE,E W
FM32-Kern Canyon (Lake Isabella) 2011 272.38 7.3 N|SS 60 E W FM32-Kern Canyon (North Kern) 2011 262.30 7.7 Normal 60 E W FM32-Kern Canyon (South Kern) 2011 262.72 7.7 Normal 60 E W FM32-La Panza 2011 126.19 7.3 Strike Slip 51 NE NW
FM32-Lake Isabella (Seismicity) 273.44 7.1 Strike Slip 90 -- W FM32-Las Positas 138.45 6.4 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM32-Lions Head 2011 CFM 175.76 7.6 Reverse 75 N,NE NW
FM32-Los Alamos 2011 CFM 207.41 7.7 SS|R 30 SW NW
FM32-Los Alamos extension 229.36 7.6 SS|R 30 S,SW NW
FM32-Los Medanos - Roe Island 181.68 7.8 SS|R 39 NE S
FM32-Los Osos 2011 122.48 7.8 SS|R 45 S,SW N
FM32-Lost Hills 137.05 6.8 Reverse 29 SW NW
FM32-Maacama 2011 CFM 258.26 7.6 Strike Slip 63 NE SE
FM32-Mission (connected) 2011 CFM 122.68 7.5 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM32-Mission Ridge-Arroyo Parida-Santa
Ana 257.13 8.1 SS|R 70 SE,S NW
FM32-Mono Lake 2011 CFM 261.29 6.6 Normal 50 NE,E SW
FM32-Monte Vista - Shannon 2011 CFM 88.25 8.1 SS|R 61 S,SW SE FM32-Monterey Bay-Tularcitos 16.19 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- NE FM32-Morales (East) 209.93 6.5 Reverse 32 N NW
FM32-Morales (West) 189.58 6.8 Reverse 32 NE NW
FM32-Mount Diablo Thrust 153.51 7.8 SS|R 38 NE S
FM32-North Channel 234.82 7.9 SS|R 26 N,NE,N NW
FM32-Oak Ridge (Offshore) 285.36 7.8 Reverse 32 S NW
FM32-Oak Ridge (Offshore) west extension 265.15 7.8 Reverse 67 S,SW NW FM32-Oceanic - West Huasna 75.92 7.8 SS|R 58 N,NE,E NW
FM32-Ortigalita (North) 69.80 6.8 Strike Slip 90 -- S
FM32-Ortigalita (South) 51.51 7.2 Strike Slip 90 -- S
7 770

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024 Attenuation Relationship Type Source Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude Mechanism Dip Angle (degree) Dips Direction Site Lies FM32-Owens Valley 282.71 7.8 N|SS 90 -- W
FM32-Owens Valley Keough Hot Springs 278.81 7.8 N|SS 50-86 NE,E W FM32-Ozena 225.85 7.6 Reverse 33 S,SW NW
FM32-Pilarcitos 2011 CFM 123.15 8.0 SS|R 81 NE SE
FM32-Pine Mtn 251.63 7.7 SS|R 45 N,NE,N NW
FM32-Pitas Point (Upper) 247.54 7.9 Reverse 42 N NW
FM32-Pleito 247.26 8.1 SS|R 46 SE,S,S W
NW
FM32-Point Reyes 2011 CFM 213.16 7.0 Reverse 53 N,NE,E SE FM32-Point Reyes 2011 connector 178.74 8.0 SS|R 53 NE SE FM32-Quien Sabe 2011 CFM 38.92 7.6 Strike Slip 85 SW S
FM32-Red Mountain 232.94 7.9 SS|R 56 N NW
FM32-Reliz 2011 CFM 6.33 8.1 Strike Slip 58 SW SE
FM32-Rinconada 2011 CFM 24.90 7.8 SS|R 82 SW,W N
FM32-Robinson Creek 267.59 6.5 Normal 50 SE SW
FM32-Rodgers Creek - Healdsburg 2011
CFM 217.10 7.6 Strike Slip 77 NE SE
FM32-Round Valley 259.19 7.2 Normal 50 NE,E W
FM32-San Andreas (Big Bend) 239.80 8.1 SS|R 90 -- NW
FM32-San Andreas (Carrizo) rev 180.96 8.1 SS|R 90 -- NW FM32-San Andreas (Cholame) rev 119.36 8.2 Strike Slip 90 -- NW FM32-San Andreas (Creeping Section)
2011 CFM 22.97 8.4 Strike Slip 90 -- NW
FM32-San Andreas (Mojave N) 284.82 8.0 Strike Slip 90 -- NW FM32-San Andreas (North Coast) 2011
CFM 201.69 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- SE
FM32-San Andreas (Parkfield) 83.90 8.2 Strike Slip 90 -- NW FM32-San Andreas (Peninsula) 2011 CFM 102.48 8.0 SS|R 90 -- SE FM32-San Andreas (Santa Cruz Mts) 2011
CFM 44.08 8.1 Strike Slip 79 SW SE
FM32-San Cayetano 283.03 8.1 SS|R 42 N NW
FM32-San Gabriel 292.70 7.7 Strike Slip 61 NE NW
FM32-San Gregorio (North) 2011 CFM 89.04 8 SS|R 90 -- SE FM32-San Gregorio (South) 2011 CFM 41.69 8.2 Strike Slip 75 NE,E NE FM32-San Juan 111.48 7.4 SS|R 90 -- NW
8 771

Crawford
& Associates, lnc.---------------------------------------- Gsotschnics1 E(lgineerir19, Design and construction services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024 Attenuation Relationship Type Source Closest Distance (km) Maximum Magnitude Mechanism Dip Angle (degree) Dips Direction Site Lies FM32-San Luis Bay 2011 CFM 142.33 7.8 SS|R 90 -- N
FM32-San Luis Range - Pecho 2011 CFM 142.45 6.6 Reverse 90 -- N FM32-San Luis Range (So Margin) 131.27 7.9 SS|R 45 N,NE NW FM32-Santa Cruz Island 288.11 7.9 SS|R 90 -- NW
FM32-Santa Rosa Island 277.21 7.9 SS|R 90 -- NW
FM32-Santa Ynez (East) 263.76 7.7 SS|R 70 S NW
FM32-Santa Ynez (West) 226.09 7.7 SS|R 70 S,SW N
FM32-Santa Ynez River 205.76 7.7 SS|R 70 S,SW N
FM32-Sargent 2011 CFM 50.44 8.1 SS|R 90 -- SE
FM32-Shoreline 134.42 7.8 SS|R 90 -- N
FM32-Sierra Nevada (No Extension) 291.47 7.7 N|SS 50 E W FM32-Silver Creek 2011 CFM 87.86 7.8 Strike Slip 75 NE,E S FM32-Sisar 294.51 7.9 Reverse 29 S NW
FM32-South Cuyama 158.83 7.9 Reverse 33 S,SW NW
FM32-Swain Ravine - Spenceville 258.33 7.4 Normal 60 NE,E S FM32-Ventura-Pitas Point 275.15 8 SS|R 64 N,NW,
N NW
FM32-West Napa 2011 CFM 209.55 7 Strike Slip 75 SW,W SE FM32-West Tahoe 284.73 7.3 Normal 50 E SW
FM32-White Mountains 288.92 7.4 Strike Slip 90 -- W
FM32-White Wolf 261.67 7 Normal 50 E SW
FM32-White Wolf (Extension) 283.19 7.6 Strike Slip 90 -- SE FM32-Zayante-Vergeles 42.81 8 SS|R 76 SE,S NW
FM31_Normal 0.00 7.9 Normal 90 -- Abo
ve
FM31_Reverse 0.00 7.9 Reverse 90 -- Abo
ve
FM31_StrikeSlip 0.00 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- Abo
ve
FM32_Normal 0.00 7.9 Normal 90 -- Abo
ve
FM32_Reverse 0.00 7.9 Reverse 90 -- Abo
ve
FM32_StrikeSlip 0.00 7.9 Strike Slip 90 -- Abo
ve
9 772

Crawford
& Associates, 1nc_--------------------------------- Gsotechnica1 E(lgineerif]g, Design and construct ion services

DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Appendix V: Site-Specific Ground Motion Hazard Memorandum Crawford Recycled Water Conveyance File: 24-1057.1
City of Soledad, California July 26, 2024

ATTACHMENTS
Figure 1: Probabilistic Response Spectra-NGA Attenuations Figure 2: Deterministic Response Spectra-NGA Attenuations Figure 3: Risk Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) Figure 4: Site-Specific Risk Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) vs Site Specific Design Response
Figure 5: Design Response Spectrum
773

10.0 1.0
C
0 ·.;:::;
QJ
u u
<t
u
QJ
Cl.

V) 0.1

0.0 0.01
- • - Abrahamson-et al {2014)
----· Boore-et al {2014)
Probabilistic Response Spectra - NGA Attenuations
Horizontal Ground Motions

0.1 1
Period (s)
- • • Campbell and Bozorgnia {2014)
•••••••• Chiou and Youngs {2014)
- Mean Max Rotated Component 2%in SO Years -NGA Relationships - Probabilistic Ground Motion {MCER) Risk Adjusted Max Rotated Component, SaM 1% Collapse in 50 years - NGA Relationships 10 Appendix V
Figure 1
07/18/2024
Soledad Recycled Water
Conveyance Probabilistic
Response SpectraNGA Attenuations
Soledad, CA Prj. No: 24-1057.1
Date:
774

10.0 :§ 1.0
C
ltl
ai
a:;
V
:J.
iii
t3
QI
a.

VI Q.1

0.0 0.01
Deterministic Response Spectra - NGA Attenuations
Horizontal Ground Motions

0.1 - • • Abrahamson-et al (2014)
•······ Boore-et al (2014)
- - - Campbell and Bozorgnia (2014)
-
·
-
·
- Chiou and Youngs (2014)
Period (s)
- Mean Max Rotate Component 2% in SO Years Sa -NGA Attenuations 1 - --• Spectral Acceleration (1.SFa) Site Class D for Deterministic Comparison Supplement 21.2.2 10 Appendix V
Figure 2
07/18/2024
Soledad Recycled Water
Conveyance Deterministic
Response SpectraNGA Attenuations
Soledad, CA Prj. No: 24-1057.1
Date:
775

2.5 2.0
.!:9
C 1.5
0 ·.;::,
..Q!
QJ
u u
<(
ti 1.0 QJ

0..

0.5 0.0

0.0 ,,
\
Risk Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCEr)
Horizontal Ground Motions
I ', .., ......... ------......
,__
' ' ' ' ' '

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
- • Probabilistic (MCEr) Ground Motion
- - - Deterministic (MCEr) Ground Motion
' ' ' ' '

5.0 Period (s)
' ' ' ' ' .. ..
..
..
..
..
..
...

6.0 7.0
..
..
..
...
--Site-Specific Risk Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCEr) Ground Motion ...
...
... ...
...
... ... ...
.........
... ...

8.0 9.0 10.0
Appendix V
Figure 3
07/18/2024
Soledad Recycled Water
Conveyance Risk Targeted
Maximum ConsideredEarthquake (MCEr)
Soledad, CA Prj. No: 24-1057.1
Date:
776

2.5 2.0
C 1.5
0 ·.;::,
QJ
'iii
u u
<(
...,
u
QJ 1.0

0..

0.5 0.0

0.0 ,, ' \ \ ' ' ' ' \ \ '
' ' '
\
\
\
Site-Specific Risk Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCEr} vs Site Specific Design Response Spectrum
Horizontal Ground Motions
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.. ..
.. ..
.. .. ..
......
.. .. ..
..
--
---
---
---
--------

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Period (s)

6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
- - - Site-Specific Risk Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCEr) Ground Motion - site-Specific Design Response Spectrum (ASCE 7-16 Section 21.2) ----
.

10.0 Appendix V
Figure 4
07/18/2024
Soledad Recycled Water
Conveyance Site-Specific Risk Targeted
Maximum ConsideredEarthquake (MCEr) vs Site
Specific Design Response
Soledad, CA Prj. No: 24-1057.1
Date:
777

1.5 1.3 1.0
:§
C
0 ·,.:;
QJ
a:;
u 0.8 u
<(
t
QJ
Cl.

0.5 ' ' 0.3 0.0

0.0 ----
\
\
'

1.0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , ....

2.0 ........
........

3.0 Design Spectral Response
Horizontal Ground Motions
............
----- ]~~=----t-----+-----
---------------

4.0 5.0
Period (s)

6.0 1 i----------

7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
- - • 80% A5CE 7-16 Section 11.4.6 Design Spectrum for Site Class D - • ASCE 7-16 Section 21.2 Design Response Spectrum - Design Spectral Response
Appendix V
Figure 5
07/18/2024
Soledad Recycled Water
Conveyance Design Spectral
Response Horizontal
Ground Motions
Soledad, CA Prj. No: 24-1057.1
Date:
778
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
779
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 1

SOLEDAD RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT
----

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) is a CEQA required component of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) process for the Project (CEQA Guidelines §15074).

Specifically, CEQA requires that lead agencies adopting MNDs take affirmative steps to determine that a project implements the approved mitigation measures subsequent to project approval (CEQA Guidelines §15074(d)).

As part of the CEQA environmental review procedures, Public Resources Code §21081.6 requires a public agency to adopt a monitoring and reporting program to ensure efficacy and enforceability of any mitigation measures applied to a proposed project. The lead agency must adopt an MMRP for mitigation measures incorporated into the project or proposed as conditions of approval. The MMRP must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation.

As stated in §21081.6(a)(1):
“The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program.”
The MMRP is provided on the following pages. This table lists each of the mitigation measures proposed in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and specifies the agency responsible for implementation of the mitigation measure and the time period for the mitigation measure.
780
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
781
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 3
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Implementing Party Timing Verifying Party
Biological Resources:

Employee education program to avoid
impacts to biological resources during
construction
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: A qualified biologist
will conduct an Employee Education Program for
the construction crew prior to any construction
activities. The qualified biologist will meet with the
construction crew at the onset of construction at the
evaluation area to educate the construction crew
on the following: 1) the appropriate access route(s)
in and out of the construction area and review
Project boundaries; 2) how a biological monitor will
examine the area and agree upon a method which
will ensure the safety of the monitor during such
activities, 3) the identification of special status
species that may be present; 4) the specific
mitigation measures that will be incorporated into
the construction effort; 5) the general provisions
and protections afforded; and 6) the proper
procedures if a special status species is
encountered within the Project site to avoid
impacts.

City, qualified biologist Prior to and during
construction
City
Biological Resources:

Impacts to special-status wildlife species
such as Congdon’s tarplant and Salinas
pocket mouse during construction
See Mitigation Measure BIO-1 above.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2: A qualified biologist
will conduct protocol-level surveys for Congdon’s
tarplant and Salinas pocket mouse within the
Project boundaries, within the WRF, and within the
agricultural/ruderal habitat prior to construction.

Protocol-level surveys shall be conducted by a
qualified biologist at the appropriate time of year for species with the potential to occur within the site. A
report describing the results of the surveys shall be
provided to the project proponents prior to any
ground disturbing activities. The report shall
include but is not limited to 1) a description of the
species observed, if any; 2) map of the location, if
observed; and 3) recommended avoidance and
minimization measures, if applicable.

City, qualified biologist Prior to construction City
Biological Resources:

Impacts to San Joaquin whipsnake, a
CDFW species of special concern, during
construction
See Mitigation Measure BIO-1 above.

Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Prior to construction
activities in the staging area, a qualified biologist
will conduct a clearance survey in suitable habitat
City, qualified biologist Within two weeks
prior to construction
activities
City
782
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 4
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Implementing Party Timing Verifying Party
within the Survey Area for San Joaquin whipsnake.

If San Joaquin whipsnake is observed during
construction, measures will be taken to avoid the
individual(s) and the species will be allowed to
leave on its own volition or will be relocated outside
of the survey area by the qualified biologist.

Biological Resources:

Impacts to nesting raptors and other
nesting avian species during construction,
including tree removal
See Mitigation Measure BIO-1 above.

Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Project activities that
may affect protected nesting avian species (e.g.,
tree removal, noise, vibrations) shall be scheduled
after September 15 and before February 1 to avoid
the avian breeding and nesting season.

Alternatively, a qualified biologist shall be retained
by the Project applicant to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting raptors and other protected avian species within 300 feet of
proposed Project activities if work occurs between
February 1 and September 15. Pre-construction
surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days
prior to the start of Project activities during the early part of the breeding season (February through
April) and no more than 30 days prior to the
initiation of these activities during the late part of
the breeding season (May through September).

Because some bird species nest early in spring and
others nest later in summer, and because some
species breed multiple times in a season, surveys
for nesting birds may be required to continue during
Project activities to address new arrivals. If Project
activities are halted for more than 14 days during
the avian nesting season, additional surveys shall
be conducted. The necessity and timing of these
continued surveys shall be determined by the
qualified biologist.

If raptors or other protected avian species nests are
identified during the pre-construction surveys, the
qualified biologist shall notify the Project applicant
and an appropriate no-disturbance buffer shall be
imposed within which no disturbance should take
place (generally 300 feet in all directions for
City, qualified biologist Schedule
construction after
September 1 and
before January 31.

Alternatively, if
construction
scheduled between
February 1 and
August 31, conduct
surveys no more
than 14 days prior
to the start of
construction
activities during the
early part of the
breeding season
(February through
April) and no more
than 30 days prior
to the initiation of
these activities
during the late part
of the breeding
season (May
through August).

City
783
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 5
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Implementing Party Timing Verifying Party
raptors; other avian species may have speciesspecific requirements) until the young of the year have fledged and are no longer reliant upon the
nest or parental care for survival, as determined by
a qualified biologist.

Cultural Resources:

Inadvertent discovery of cultural resources
during construction
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: The City of Soledad
shall note on any plans that require ground
disturbing excavation that there is a potential for
exposing buried cultural resources including
prehistoric Native American burials. Archaeological
site information supplied to the Contractor shall be
considered confidential.

The City of Soledad shall retain a Professional
Archaeologist on an “on-call” basis during ground
disturbing construction to review, identify, and
evaluate cultural resources that may be
inadvertently exposed during construction. The
archaeologist shall review and evaluate any
discoveries to determine if they are historical
resource(s) and/or unique archaeological
resources or Tribal cultural resources under
CEQA.

If the Professional Archaeologist determines that
any cultural resources exposed during construction
constitute a historical resource and/or unique
archaeological resource or Tribal cultural resource
under CEQA, he/she shall notify the City of
Soledad and other appropriate parties of the
evaluation. The Professional Archaeologist shall
recommend mitigation measures to mitigate to less
than significant in accordance with California
Public Resources Code Section 15064.5. Tribal
cultural resources shall be evaluated with the
assistance of Native American Tribes and/or
individual Tribal members who have previously
been contacted and responded to outreach efforts
by the City of Soledad. Mitigation measures may
include avoidance, preservation in-place,
recordation, additional archaeological testing and
data recovery among other options. The
City, qualified archaeologist During construction City, NAHC, County Coroner
784
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 6
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Implementing Party Timing Verifying Party
completion of a formal Archaeological Monitoring
Plan (AMP) and/or Archaeological Treatment Plan
(ATP) that may include data recovery may be
recommended by the Professional Archaeologist if
significant archaeological deposits (or Tribal
cultural resources) are exposed during ground
disturbing construction. The City of Soledad will
determine development and implementation of the
AMP and ATP, and treatment of significant cultural
resources and/or tribal cultural resources in
consultation with any regulatory agencies and
Native American Tribes and Tribal individuals.

A Monitoring Closure Report shall be filed with the
City of Soledad at the conclusion of ground
disturbing construction if archaeological and Native
American monitoring was undertaken.

Cultural Resources:

Inadvertent discovery of human remains
during construction
Mitigation Measure CUL-2: The treatment of
human remains, and any associated or
unassociated funerary objects discovered during
any soil-disturbing activity within the project site
shall comply with applicable State laws. This shall
include immediate notification of the Monterey
County Sheriff’s Office and the City of Soledad.

In the event of the coroner's determination that the
human remains are Native American, notification of
the Native American Heritage Commission is
required. Upon notification, the Native American
Heritage Commission shall appoint a Most Likely
Descendant (MLD) (PRC Section 5097.98).

The City of Soledad, Professional Archaeologist
and MLD shall make all reasonable efforts to
develop an agreement for the treatment, with
appropriate dignity, of human remains and
associated or unassociated funerary objects
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(d)). The
agreement should take into consideration the
appropriate excavation, removal, recordation,
analysis, custodianship, curation, and final
disposition of the human remains and associated
City, qualified archaeologist During construction City, NAHC, County Coroner
785
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 7
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Implementing Party Timing Verifying Party
or unassociated funerary objects. The California
PRC allows 48 hours to reach agreement on these
matters. If the MLD and the other parties do not
agree on the reburial method, the project will follow
PRC Section 5097.98(b) which states that ". . . the
landowner or his or her authorized representative
shall reinter the human remains and items
associated with Native American burials with
appropriate dignity on the property in a location not
subject to further subsurface disturbance."
Hazards & Hazardous Materials:

Handling and use of hazardous materials
during construction
Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a
grading permit, the contractor shall prepare a
Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Control
Plan that addresses potential impacts associated
with hazardous material usage during construction
and operation. The plan shall, at a minimum,
consist of the following:
 Identify applicable safety and clean-up
procedures in the event of a spill.
 Designate construction staging areas where
hazardous materials may be stored. All
staging areas shall be located outside of
sensitive biological areas. Staging areas shall
be designed to contain runoff to prevent
contaminants (e.g., oil, grease, fuel products,
etc.) from draining towards receiving waters
and sensitive areas.
 Identify appropriate emergency notification
procedures and emergency contacts (e.g.,
County of Monterey Environmental Health,
City of Soledad Fire, etc.).
 Designated location where a spill kit shall be
maintained on-site throughout the Project.
 Identify dedicated storage areas where
hazardous material may be stored and/or used
during operation.

Contractor Prior to and during
construction
City
Tribal Cultural Resources:

Employee education program to avoid
impacts to Tribal cultural resources during
construction
See Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2
above.

Mitigation Measure TR-1: Prior to ground
disturbance activities, a Tribal Cultural monitor
City, Tribal cultural monitor During construction City
786
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 8
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Implementing Party Timing Verifying Party
shall provide cultural sensitivity training to all
construction personnel. The training shall explain
applicable statues, regulations, enforcement
provisions; the prehistoric and historic
environmental setting and context, local Tribal
groups; show sample artifacts; and what
prehistoric and historic archaeological deposits
look like at the surface and when exposed during
construction. Construction personnel shall not be
permitted to operate equipment within the
construction area unless they have attended the
training. A list of the names of all personnel who
attended the training, and copies of the signed
acknowledgement forms shall be submitted to the
City of Soledad Director of Public Works or a
designee.
787
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project January 2025
MMRP Page 9
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
788
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Responses to Public Comments
789

Responses to Public Comments
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Response to Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of San Juan Bautista Thank you for your response letter and comments regarding the IS/MND for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project. The potential impacts of the Proposed Project on cultural and tribal cultural resources are evaluated in the IS/MND in Sections 4.5 and 4.17. The Cultural Resources Assessment Report prepared for the Project (BASIN, August 2024) included a field reconnaissance, a records search of the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University, and a Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission. The City conducted Native American outreach and consultation in accordance with AB 52.

The City sent letters containing a brief project description and maps of the Project to the Native American Tribes identified by the NAHC on September 18, 2024 per AB 52. The City received letters from the following Tribes: the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of San Juan Bautista and the Salinas Tribe. The Amah Mutsun Tribe expressed concerns about cultural or historic sensitivity within one mile of the Project and, if so, the need to provide cultural sensitivity training before construction and Native American archaeological monitoring during earthmoving activities. The Salinas Tribe stated that unknown buried cultural resources and burials may be impacted by the Project and requested that areas near known sites be monitored by a Native American cultural resource specialist from their tribe. Mitigation is identified in the IS/MND, as described below, to protect cultural and Tribal cultural resources that may be affected by the Project.

The IS/MND identified measures that the Project would implement to protect cultural and tribal cultural resources. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires that the City note on the plans any areas that require ground disturbing excavation with potential for exposing buried cultural resources, including prehistoric Native American burials. The City shall retain a Professional Archaeologist on an “on-call” basis during ground disturbing construction to identify potential cultural resources that may be inadvertently exposed during construction and recommend mitigation measures as needed. Tribal cultural resources shall be evaluated with the assistance of Native American Tribes and/or individual Tribal members who have previously been contacted and responded to outreach efforts by the City. Mitigation measures may include avoidance or preservation in-place among other options. The completion of a formal Archaeological Monitoring Plan (AMP) and/or Archaeological Treatment Plan (ATP) that may include data recovery may be recommended by the Professional Archaeologist if significant archaeological deposits (or Tribal cultural resources) are exposed during ground disturbing construction. Development and implementation of the AMP and ATP, and treatment of significant cultural resources and/or Tribal cultural resources will be determined by the City of Soledad in consultation with any regulatory agencies and Native American Tribes and Tribal individuals. Finally, this mitigation requires that a Monitoring Closure Report be filed with the City at the conclusion of ground disturbing construction.

Mitigation Measure CUL-2 calls for the treatment of human remains and any associated or unassociated funerary objects that may be discovered during soil-disturbing activity within the site in compliance with applicable State laws. This shall include immediate notification of the Monterey County Sheriff’s Office and the City of Soledad. In the event of the coroner's determination that the human remains are Native American, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, is required who shall appoint a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) (PRC Section 5097.98). The City of Soledad, Professional Archaeologist and MLD shall make all 790

reasonable efforts to develop an agreement for the treatment, with appropriate dignity, of human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(d)). The agreement should take into consideration the appropriate excavation, removal, recordation, analysis, custodianship, curation, and final disposition of the human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects. The California PRC allows 48 hours to reach agreement on these matters. If the MLD and the other parties do not agree on the reburial method, the project will follow PRC Section 5097.98(b) which states that ". . . the landowner or his or her authorized representative shall reinter the human remains and items associated with Native American burials with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance."
Furthermore, Mitigation Measure TR-1 requires that a tribal cultural monitor shall provide cultural sensitivity training to all construction personnel prior to ground disturbance activities.

This mitigation measure is consistent with the recommendations of your letter.

With implementation of these mitigation measures, consistent with the recommendations of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on Tribal cultural resources. The City acknowledges the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band’s offer of monitoring services.
791

Response to Caltrans
Thank you for your response letter and comments regarding the IS/MND for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project.

In accordance with Caltrans requirements, the Project contractor would contact Caltrans for any future work that affects the State highway right-of-way, which is subject to a Caltrans encroachment permit. Such work would be done in accordance with Caltrans engineering and environmental standards and at no cost to the State. It is hereby noted that the conditions of approval and the requirements for the encroachment permit are issued at the sole discretion of the Caltrans Permits Office. In addition, all non-operational or vacated pipes would be removed, although the District Permit Engineer may grant waivers to this requirement based on an engineering evaluation. The City would coordinate with Caltrans in the event that waivers are required as part of Project implementation.

Finally, the Project contractor would provide documents for additional Caltrans evaluation and approval at the time of their review. The IS/MND contains mitigation measures to avoid environmental impacts of the Project. However, it is noted that impacts to the State’s right-ofway may require additional measures as recommended by Caltrans. 792
I
From: Amah Mutsun Tribal <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 12:16 PM
To: Hilda M. Ramirez <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project IS/MND: Public Notice You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Hello Hilda,
Thank you for the information on the proposed project, and please see the attached documents with our recommendations. If you have any questions about the attached documents, or would like to set up a meeting to discuss consultation, please give us a call at 650-851-7489 or email us at [email protected].

Thank you,
Lorelei Alli
AMTB Inc.
793

The Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of San Juan Bautista &
AMTB
Letter of Response
To whom it may concern:

It is our pride and privilege to be of service for any Native American Cultural Resource Monitoring, Consulting and/ or Sensitivity Training you may need or require. We take our Heritage and History seriously and are diligent about preserving as much of it as we can. Construction is a constant in the Bay Area and with that new discoveries are bound to happen. If you choose our services, we will gladly guide all personnel through proper procedures to safely protect and preserve: Culture, Heritage, and History.

It is highly recommended, if not previously done, to search through Sacred Lands Files (SLF) and California Historical Resource Information Systems (CHRIS) as well as reaching out to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) In order to determine whether you are working in a Cultural and/ or Historic sensitivity.

If you have received any positive cultural or historic sensitivity within 1 mile of the project area here are A.M.T.B Inc’s and Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of San Juan Bautista’s recommendations:
● All Crews, Individuals and Personnel who will be moving any earth be Cultural Sensitivity Trained.
● A Qualified California Trained Archaeological Monitor is present during any earth movement.
● A Qualified Native American Monitor is present during any earth movement.

If further Consultation, Monitoring or Sensitivity Training is needed please feel free to contact A.M.T.B. Inc. or Myself Directly. A.M.T.B. Inc. 650-851-7747
Irenne Zwierlein
2451 Tyrolean Way, Sacramento CA
95821
[email protected]
(650)851-7747
794

r I
Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of San Juan Bautista
&
AMTB
2451 Tyrolean Way, Sacramento CA 95821
Our rates for 2025 are
$200.00 per hour.
4 hours minimum
Cancellations not 48 hours (about 2 days) prior will be charged as a 4-hour minimum. There is a round trip mileage charge if canceled after they have traveled to site.

Anything over 8 hours a day is charged as time and a half.

Weekends are charged at time and a half.

Holidays are charged at double the time.

For fiscal year (FY) 2025, standard per diem rate of $425. ($333. lodging, $92 M&IE).

M&IE Breakdown FY 2025
M&IE
Total
Continental
Breakfast/
Breakfast
Lunch Dinner Incidental
Expenses First & Last Day of Travel
$92.00 $23.00 $26.00 $38.00 $5.00 $69.00
Beginning 2025, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car round trip (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be: $.70 cents per mile driven for business use or what the current federal standard is at the time.

Our Payment terms are 5 days from date on invoice.

Our Monitors are Members of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the A.M.T.B. Inc. at the below contact information.

Sincerely,
Irenne Zwierlein
2451 Tyrolean Way, Sacramento CA
95821
[email protected]
(650)851-7747
795

------.
-A,Cc:>_Rd
I
-
- ~ □
~ □ □
~
~ - L-- ...__
L-- ...__
-
7 I I
I I l
[

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
01/14/2025
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATIONIS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

PRODUCER

ALLIED BROKERS INSURANCE AGCY INC
57101434
591 LYTTON AVENUE
PALO ALTO CA 94301

CONTACT
NAME:

PHONE (866) 467-8730
(A/C, No, Ext):

FAX (888) 443-6112
(A/C, No):

E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#

INSURED

AMTB LLC
2451 TYROLEAN WAY
SACRAMENTO CA 95821-4809
INSURER A : Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company 30104 INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

INSR

LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDLINSR
SUBR

WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/Y YYY)
LIMITS
A

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
57 SBM BM9HAR 01/14/2025 01/14/2026
EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000

CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $1,000,000
X General Liability MED EXP (Any one person) $10,000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $1,000,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 X POLICY PROJECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $2,000,000 OTHER:

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
57 SBM BM9HAR 01/14/2025 01/14/2026

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident) $1,000,000
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person)

ALL OWNED
AUTOS

SCHEDULED
AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident)

X HIRED

AUTOS X NON-OWNEDAUTOS

PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB
OCCUR
CLAIMSMADE

EACH OCCURRENCE

AGGREGATE
DED RETENTION $

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
ANY

PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
N/ A
PER

STATUTE
OTHER
Y/N E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) The Business Liability Coverage Part includes a Blanket Additional Insured By Contract Endorsement, Form SL 30 32.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED

BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 796

CALI FORN IA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVER NOR California Department of Transportation
CALTRANS DISTRICT 5
50 HIGUERA STREET | SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-5415
(805) 549-3101 | FAX (805) 549-3329 TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
February 18, 2025 SCH #2025010539

MON/VAR
Don Wilcox, Public Works Director
City of Soledad
248 Main Street
Soledad, CA 93960
Re: Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)
Dear Mr. Wilcox:

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) appreciates the opportunity to review the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, which proposes installing and operating infrastructure necessary to convey Title 22 recycled water from the City of Soledad’s Water Reclamation Facility (“WRF”) to up to 20 parks and schools throughout the City of Soledad. Caltrans supports local development that is consistent with State planning priorities intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety. We accomplish this by working with local jurisdictions to achieve a shared vision of how the transportation system should and can accommodate interregional and local travel and development. Caltrans offers the following comments in response to the MND:

1. Please be aware that any future work that is completed in, on, under, over, or affecting the State highway right-of-way is subject to a Caltrans encroachment permit and must be done to our engineering and environmental standards and at no cost to the State. The conditions of approval and the requirements for the encroachment permit are issued at the sole discretion of the Permits Office, and nothing in this letter shall be implied as limiting those future conditions and requirements. For more information regarding the encroachment permit process, please visit our Encroachment Permit Website at:
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/ep

2. All non-operational or vacated pipes shall be removed. The District Permit Engineer may grant waivers to this requirement based on an engineering evaluation. “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” 797

Don Wilcox, Public Works Director
February 18, 2025

Page 2 ends

3. All future documents will be subject to additional evaluation and approval at the time of their review. As part of future evaluation, issues involving or impacting the State’s right of way may require additional mitigation due to pertinent issues such as cultural resources, environmental justice, water quality, hydrology, etc.

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions or need further clarification on the items discussed above, please contact me at (805) 835-6543 or email [email protected].

Sincerely,
Jacob Hernandez
Transportation Planner
District 5 Local Development Review Coordinator
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” 798
RESOLUTION NO. 6232

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLEDAD APPROVING A

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT WITH SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $13,780,764.80 FOR THE FOR THE

CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOLEDAD RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE

PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID

CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF SOLEDAD AND CONCURRENTLY

APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT DEDUCTIVE CHANGE ORDER WITH SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF - $1,504,419.05 FOR A NET TOTAL AMOUNT OF $12,276,345.75, PLUS A $650,000

CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY FOR A TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $12,926,345.75
WHEREAS, the City of Soledad proposes to implement the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project; and
WHEREAS, the Project generally includes constructing a new recycled water booster pump station and associated facilities, approximately five miles of 4-inch diameter to 12-inch diameter pressurized recycled water pipeline and appurtenances and retrofitting landscape irrigation systems at approximately twenty schools and parks within the City; and WHEREAS, all construction will occur within previously disturbed public rights of way and easements. The Project will be constructed within existing City Streets and developed parcels including Soledad Unified School District school campuses and City of Soledad parks, and one new pipeline will be constructed within an existing easement across active farm fields between the City proper to the City island where the City’s WRF is located; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2025, Soledad issued a Notice for Bids through PlanetBids for the City’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project with a bid due date of March 27, 2025 and an engineer’s estimate of probable construction costs of $17,764,621; and WHEREAS, the City received three (3) bids for the City’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed the bid proposals and determined that Specialty Construction, Inc. was the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and WHEREAS, therefore, Staff recommends approval of a contract with SCI for construction services for a total amount not to exceed of $13,780,764.80 in which the City’s Standard Contract form will be used; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the foregoing, due to the fact that Specialty Construction, Inc’s bid exceeding the available construction budget for the Project, the City and Specialty have negotiated a Deductive Change Order to reduce the scope of work, as well as a value engineering 799
deduction, both of which will allow the City to go forward with the completion of the majority of the Project within the available construction budget and still maintain the minimum recycled water offset required by the grant, and a new not to exceed amount of $12,926,345.75; and, WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the CEQA Guidelines and City of Soledad CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the Council authorized Resolution No. 6231 Adopting the proposed Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project (Project) and directed staff to file a CEQA Notice of Determination.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Soledad as follows:

1. The Council approves a Construction Services Contract between the City of Soledad and Specialty Construction, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $13,780,764.80 for the City’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project, and a copy of the bid proposal with Specialty Construction, Inc. is attached as “Exhibit A” and by reference incorporated herein, and the City Manager is authorized and directed to prepare an appropriate agreement for said services, subject to City Attorney review, and to execute the same.

2. The Council concurrently approves a Construction Services Contract Deductive Change Order with Specialty Construction, Inc. in the amount of -$1,504,419.05 for a net total amount of $12,276,345.75, plus a $650,000 Construction Contingency for a total not to exceed amount of $12,926,345.75 for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, and a copy of the Change Order with Specialty Construction, Inc. is attached as “Exhibit B” and by reference incorporated herein, and the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the same.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Soledad at a regular meeting duly held on the 21st day of May 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

ANNA M. VELAZQUEZ, Mayor
ATTEST:
800
MEGAN HUNTER, City Clerk
801
Bid Proposal
Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Specialty Construction, Inc.
(“Bidder") hereby submits this Bid
Proposal to the City of Soledad (“City”) for the above-referenced project (“Project") in response to the Notice Inviting Bids and in accordance with the Contract Documents referenced in the Notice.

Base Bid. Bidder proposes to perform and fully complete the Work for the Project as specified in the Contract Documents, within the time required for full completion of the Work, including all labor, materials, supplies, and equipment and all other direct or indirect costs including, but not limited to, taxes, insurance and all overhead, for the following price (“Base Bid"):

1. $
Addenda. Bidder agrees that it has confirmed receipt of or access to, and reviewed, all addenda issued for this bid. Bidder waives any claims it might have against the City based on its failure to receive, access, or review any addenda for any reason. Bidder specifically acknowledges receipt of the following addenda:

2. Addendum: Date Received:
3/11/2025
Addendum: Date Received:
#01 #05
#02 3/14/2025 #06
#03 3/21/2025 #07#04 #08
Bidder’s Certifications and Warranties. By signing and submitting this Bid Proposal, Bidder certifies and warrants the following:

3. 3.1 Examination of Contract Documents. Bidder has thoroughly examined the Contract Documents and represents that, to the best of Bidder’s knowledge, there are no errors, omissions, or discrepancies in the Contract Documents, subject to the limitations of Public Contract Code § 1104,

3.2 Examination of Worksite. Bidder has had the opportunity to examine the Worksite and local conditions at the Project location.

3.3 Bidder Responsibility. Bidder is a responsible bidder, with the necessary ability, capacity, experience, skill, qualifications, workforce, equipment, and resources to perform or cause the Work to be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents and within the Contract Time.

3.4 Responsibility for Bid. Bidder has carefully reviewed this Bid Proposal and is solely responsible for any errors or omissions contained in its completed bid. All statements and information provided in this Bid Proposal and enclosures are true and correct to the best of Bidder’s knowledge.

3.5 Nondiscrimination. In preparing this bid, the Bidder has not engaged in discrimination against any prospective or present employee or Subcontractor on grounds of race, color, ancestry, national origin, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, or marital status.Iran Contracting Act. If the Contract Price exceeds $1,000,000, Bidder is not identified on a list created under the Iran Contracting Act, Public Contract Code § 2200 et seq. (the “Act"),

3.6 BID PROPOSAL

Page 9 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
13,780,764.80
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 6232
802
as a person engaging in investment activities in Iran, as defined in the Act, or is otherwise expressly exempt under the Act.

Award of Contract. By signing and submitting this Bid Proposal, Bidder agrees that, if City issues the Notice of Potential Award to Bidder, then within ten days following issuance of the Notice of Potential Award to Bidder, Bidder will do all of the following:

4. Execute Contract. Enter into the Contract with City in accordance with the terms of this Bid Proposal, by signing and submitting to City the Contract prepared by City using the form included with the Contract Documents;

4.1 Submit Required Bonds. Submit to City a payment bond and a performance bond, each for 100% of the Contract Price, using the bond forms provided and in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents;

4.2 insurance Requirements. Submit to City the insurance certificate(s) and endorsement(s) as required by the Contract Documents; and

4.3 Certificates of Reported Compliance. Submit to City valid Certificates of Reported Compliance for its fleet and its listed Subcontractors, if applicable, if the Project involves the use of vehicles subject to the Off-Road Regulation. (See Section 16 of the Instructions to Bidders.)

4.4Bid Security. As a guarantee that, if awarded the Contract, Bidder will perform its obligations under Section 5 above, Bidder is enclosing bid security in the amount of ten percent of its maximum bid amount in one of the following forms (check one):

5. A cashier’s check or certified check payable to City and issued by _______________________________[Bank name] in the amount of $.

A bid bond, using the Bid Bond form included with the Contract Documents, payable to City and executed by a surety licensed to do business in the State of California.

This Bid Proposal is hereby submitted on March 27,2015. s/ Rudolph C. Bachmann, President/Secretary
CL
Name and Title
s/ Thomas A. Seidel, Vice President / Civil Division Manager iction 3. of JnstraCfions to Bidde'rsf Name and Title
Specialty Construction, Inc. 619361 / 2/28/2027
Company Name License #, Expiration Date, and Classification 645 Clarion Ct. 1000000128
Address DIR Registration #
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805)543-1706
State, Zip PhoneCity,
Tom Seidel [email protected]
Contact Name Contact Email

BID PROPOSAL

Page 10 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
803

END OF BID PROPOSAL

BID PROPOSAL

Page 11 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
804
Bid Schedule
This Bid Schedule must be completed in ink and included with the sealed Bid Proposal. Pricing must be provided for each Bid Item as indicated. Items marked “(SW)" are Specialty Work that must be performed by a qualified Subcontractor. The lump sum or unit cost for each item must be inclusive of all costs, whether direct or indirect, including profit and overhead. The sum of all amounts entered in the “Extended Total Amount” column must be identical to the Base Bid price entered in Section 1 of the Bid Proposal form.

AL = Allowance
LF = Linear Foot
CF = Cubic Feet
LS = Lump Sum
CY = Cubic Yard
SF = Square Feet
= Each LB = PoundsEA
TON = Ton (2000 lbs)

BID EXTENDED
TOTAL
AMOUNT
UNIT
ITEM DESCRIPTIONITEM EST. QTY. UNIT
COST
NO.
1 Mobilization and Demobilization 1 LS $93,000 $ 503,006 Worker Protection andSafety/Shoring pursuant to
Section 6700-6708 of the
California Labor Code, and all
applicable safety orders and
permits
2 LS 5 V,SOO 1 $11306 $
$Hr 3 Traffic Control 1 LS IH,606 $ om goo
4 Utility Potholing 353 EA $ qqz $350,l7fe
Dewatering $ 77,006 $ 17,000
5 1 LS
Sewer Main CCTV
$ 5,300
6 $530 0
1 LS
Investigations
Sewer Lateral CCTV
Investigations - Pre- $ 56,000 $ 5
Construction
7 1 LS t
Sewer Lateral CCTV
Investigations - PostConstruction
8 1 LS $50 300 $5 50 (fd
Pipe Installation - Transmission
Main
$37 $ 5
Co 9 3,756 LF JL. 1I3Z
Pipe Installation - Alignment A -
8-inch Pipeline
10 $2 $ *T36,Bnrl
1 3,793 LF I7
Pipe Installation - Alignment A -
6-inch Pipeline
11 2,318 LF $233
Little League Park Landscaping
Retrofit
12 1 LS $ 7,00a $ '-j/jOOff
Gabiian Elementary School
Landscaping Retrofit
13 1 LS $ 33000 $ 38,oog
i
San Vicente Elementary School
Landscaping Retrofit
14 1 LS $ $3,606 $ $3,000 /
$ qc,5n
15 Pipe Installation - Alignment A1 467 LF $ 37
Bill Ramus Park Landscaping
Retrofit
16 1 LS $11,666 $ 27,000
/
17 Pipe Installation - Alignment A2 348 LF $ 2IS $ 15,%H Jesse Gallardo Park
Landscaping Retrofit
18 1 LS $ 65/000 $ ()5,000
Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12

BID SCHEDULE

Page 12 ends

2024 Form
805

EXTENDED
TOTAL
AMOUNT

BID UNIT
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. UNIT
COST
NO.
$ j
r 19 Pipe installation - Alignment A3 2,495 LF f3 $ 4*1,535 20 Vosti Park Landscaping Retrofit 1 LS $ 10 0 CIO $ 70,000 21 Pipe Installation - Alignment A4 54 LF $ 500 $ £7,000 Main Street Middle School
Landscaping RetrofitPipe Installation - Alignment A5
22 1 LS $IZ7,(300 $ IZlfOQc
23 373 LF $m $ 15,$ 54
Orchard Lane Park Landscaping
Retrofit
24 1 LS $1400 $ 10400
25 Pipe Installation - Alignment A6 882 LF $ $ 115,5*2
Ramirez Park Landscaping
Retrofit
26 1 LS $ 35,000 $ 35/006
Pipe Installation - Alignment B -
8-inch PipelinePipe Installation - Alignment B -
6-inch PipelinePipe Installation - Alignment B -
4-inch Pipeline
27 2,494 LF $261 $ 555,572
2,58928 LF $ 023,171$2M(
29 711 LF $2(Q $ 1413/0
Lum Memorial Park
30 1 LS $H,ooo Landscaping Retrofit
31 313 Pipe installation - Alignment B1 LF $2Z(o $70,133 Joe Ledesma Park Landscaping
Retrofit
32 1 LS $ 35,fioo $35,606
$200 $ 17,000
$ 77,000
33 Pipe Installation - Alignment B2 385 LF
Frank Ledesma Elementary
School Landscaping Retrofit
34 1 LS $17,000
35 Pipe Installation - Alignment B3 1,161 LF $175 $ 203575 Soledad High School
36 Landscaping Retrofit
1 LS $/(5.ooo
37 Pipe Installation - Alignment B4 1,462 LF $ 2(£ $317,771 38 $ (2Joo Toledo Park Meter Connection 1 LS 1 $t$,SQQ
Jack Franscioni Landscaping
Retrofit
$ b
c 39 1 LS f)50(3 $ 31,500
40 Pipe Installation - Alignment B5 LF 568 $m $ qi.fcU
San Antonio Park Landscaping
Retrofit
41 LS1 $ 5(3 qoo $3 0/0 06
42 Pipe Installation - Alignment B6 422 LF $2(g $%W(o
Santa Barbara Park
Landscaping Retrofit $36,50 0 $ 31500
43 1 LS
$2.03 $ 2H%%j
44 Pipe Installation - Alignment B7 1,211 LF
Rose Ferrero Elementary
School Landscaping Retrofit
Pipe Installation - Alignment B8
45 1 LS $ (05,000 $ (03,000 )
46 215 LF $272. $ 52,030 L
47 Peverini Park Landscaping 1 LS $ SO,0 60 $ SOjOQQ £
Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12

BID SCHEDULE

Page 13 ends

2024 Form
806

EXTENDED
TOTAL
AMOUNT

BID UNIT
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. UNIT
COST
NO.

Retrofit
48 Pipe installation - Alignment B9 330 LF $ 2Z0 $12,600 Bias Santana Park Landscaping
Retrofit
49 1 LS $ 33)006
$ Zl
;
0 00 $ 2-1,00(3 Veterans Park RW Connection 150 LS
Combination Air Valve
Assemblies
51 28 EA 700 0 $ 336,000
Blow-off Assemblies52 20 EA $I4,ZS0 $ 2-33,60 0
Dual Combination Air Valve
53 2
Assemblies
EA $27;ooo $ 5'%6Ci
54 Pump Station - Grading 1 LS $2'63,005 $ U%0O(]
Construct Pump Station Wet
55 Weil
1 LS $253,000 $ 25 £,000
Construct Connection at
Existing Reclaimed Pump
Station Wet Well
56 1 LS $ 36,ooc $34100
Pump Station - Prefabricated
Pumping System
Pump Station - Electrical,
Instrumentation, and Controls
$1,133,(106
57 1 LS
58 1 LS $ 3&V00 $325,0 cm
Commissioning the Pump
Station
59 1 LS $iVioo $ l%006
Pump Station - 24-inch
Recycled Water Pipeline
60 237 LF $ 373 $230,833
Pump Station - 12-inch
Recycled Water Pipeline
Pump Station - 30-inch
Overflow Pipeline
WRF Temporary Fire Water
supply
61 68 LF $ 563
62 51 LF $ 2,004 $ i 05,36663 1 LS $ WOO $7/7 00
Existing RW Connection South
of Market St
64 1 LS $ IS,500
i c
f 3)560
Existing RW Connection South
of Goldenrod St
65 LS1 $ 15,500 $ i5jS'0o66 Gabilan Landscaping Retrofit 1 LS $ 23,0 0 0 $ 2!$i0Q(7
67 Front Street Swivel-Ell
-------------------- $2lB,ooo 1.
1 LS
68 Gabilan Street Swivel-Ell 1 LS $ i 5Z, 6•GV $ I62,60q 69 Cross-Connection Testing 1 LS $ 36,000 $ 36,000
i
Remove/Replace Main Street
Sewer
$223. $226,775
70 1,286 LF
Sanitary Sewage Bypass
Pumping
71 LS1 $17)660
i
72 Slurry Seal - Monterey Street SY 4.603 $770 $Z0,253.20 z 73 Slurry Seal - North Street 6,144
SY $ 47 0 $21,133, GO
74 Slurry Seal - Dixie Street 1,110 SY $770 $nm
Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12

BID SCHEDULE

Page 14 ends

2024 Form
807

EXTENDED
TOTAL
AMOUNT

BID UNIT
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QTY. UNIT COST
NO.
75 Slurry Seal - Palm Street 2,159 SY $ M>10 $ WtLQ
76 Slurry Seal - Oak Street 6,011
SY $ t)>io $ 26 WHO
$ 4
l 77 Slurry Seal - State Street 2,698
SY \6 $ 11671,26
78 Slurry Seal - Park Street 1,960
SY $ 4,4 O' $ %IH
79 Slurry Seal - Orchard Lane 2,161
SY $4,46 $ 0506.00
80 Slurry Seal - Market Street SY $4*46 $672o>gr/J 1,532 81 Slurry Seal - West Street 4,488
SY $ 0,20 swnzo
82 Slurry Seal - Gabilan Drive 19,658
SY $ hmo $%cmno
83 Slurry Seal - Prado Drive 2,109
SY $ 4,00 $ 0272-fet)
84 Slurry Seal - La Colina Street SY $ 4,40 $ %i4. 2<j 2,241 85 Seal - Vista Avenue 5,718 t
SYSlurry $4,00 $tsw.lo
86 Slurry Seal - Santa Barbara 1,383
SY $ 4-40 $ 60£5.2.0
87 Slurry Seal - Entrada Drive 3,473
SY $4,26 $ i52.8f.Zo
Slurry Seal - Front Street and
West Street Intersection
88 649 SY $ HMO
89 Pavement Striping 1 LS $4(2,006 i
90 Water Lowering for 4-inch pipe 1 EA $ 1(000 $ II, 10 0 i $ Ot;0$n,m
91 Water Lowering for 6-inch pipe EA 1 $n,w
92 Water Lowering for 8-inch pipe 1 EA $2, SO 6
All other work required to
complete the project that is not
included in Bid items 1-92
93 1 LS $660,000
Items 1 through 93 inclusive: $ ~7foM ,8*0_________________ Note: The amount entered as the “Total Base Bid” should be identical to the Base Bid amount entered in Section 1 of the Bid Proposal form.

TOTAL BASE BID:

BIDDER NAME: Specialty Construction, Inc.

END OF BID SCHEDULE
Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12

BID SCHEDULE

Page 15 ends

2024 Form
808
Subcontractor List
For each Subcontractor that will perform a portion of the Work in an amount in excess of one-half of 1 % of the Bidder’s total Base Bid,
1 the bidder must list a description of the Work, the name of the Subcontractor, its California contractor license number, the location of its place of business, its DIR registration number, and the portion of the Work that the Subcontractor is performing based on a percentage of the Base Bid price.

SUBCONTRACTOR DIRRE6.no. PERCENT
NAME

LOCATION OF

BUSINESS

DESCRIPTION

OF WORK

CALIFORNIA

CONTRACTOR
LICENSE NO.

OF
WORK
For street or highway construction, this requirement applies to any subcontract of $10,000 or more. 1 SUBCONTRACTOR LIST

Page 16 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
LANDSCAPEDEVELOPMENT INC LANDSCAPE 450067 VALENCIA, CA 1000024024

G WIEMANNCONSTRUCTION INC
957102 CONCRETE CRESTON, CA 1000016185
AMERICAN PAVEMENTSYSTEMS INC 943792 MODESTO, CA 1000000207 CHRISP COMPANY 374600 FREMONT, CA 1000000306 REDWOOD PAINTINGCO INC 302617 MEDFORD, OR 1000005253
DARREL VARNIELECTRIC INC 735622

WATSONVILLE, CA
1000001220 SLURRY STRIPING ELECTRICAL
PAINTING &COATING 4.5% 1.2% 1.8%2.4% 0.9% 2.1%
809

END OF SUBCONTRACTOR LIST

SUBCONTRACTOR LIST

Page 17 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
810
Noncollusion Declaration

TO BE EXECUTED BY BIDDER AND SUBMITTED WITH BID
The undersigned declares:

I am the President/Secretary [title] of Specialty Construction, Inc. [business name], the party making the foregoing bid.

The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham.

The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.

This declaration is intended to comply with California Public Contract Code § 7106 and Title 23 U.S.C§ 112.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on March 27,2025 San Luis Obispo
[date], at
[city], California [state].
s /
Rudolph C. Bachmann, President/Secretary
Name [print]

END OF NONCOLLUSION DECLARATION

NONCOLLUSION DECLARATION

Page 18 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
811
Bid Bond
Specialty Construction, Inc. ___________ (“Bidder”) has submitted a (“Bid”), to City of Soledad (“City”) for
work on the Recycled Water Conveyance Project (“Project”). Under this duly executed bid bond (“Bid Bond”), Bidder as Principal and Harco National Insurance Company its surety (“Surety”), are bound to City as obligee in the penal sum of ten percent of the maximum amount of the Bid (the “Bond Sum”). Bidder and Surety bind themselves and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, as follows:
bid, dated 20
General. If Bidder is awarded the Contract for the Project, Bidder will enter into the Contract with City in accordance with the terms of the Bid.

1. Submittals. Within ten days following issuance of the Notice of Potential Award to Bidder, Bidder must submit to City the following:

2. Contract. The executed Contract, using the form provided by City in the Project contract documents (“Contract Documents");

2.1 Payment Bond. A payment bond for 100% of the maximum Contract Price, executed by a surety licensed to do business in the State of California using the Payment Bond form included with the Contract Documents;

2.2 Performance Bond. A performance bond for 100% of the maximum Contract Price, executed by a surety licensed to do business in the State of California using the Performance Bond form included with the Contract Documents;

2.3 Insurance. The insurance certificate(s) and endorsement(s) required by the Contract Documents;

2.4 Certificates of Reported Compliance. Valid Certificates of Reported Compliance for its fleet and its listed Subcontractors, if applicable, in accordance with the In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation (13 CCR § 2449 et seq.) (“Off-Road Regulation”), if the Project involves the use of vehicles subject to the Off-Road Regulation; and any other documents required by the Instructions to Bidders or Notice of Potential Award.

2.5 Enforcement. If Bidder fails to execute the Contract or to submit the bonds, insurance certificates, and valid Certificates of Reported Compliance as required by the Contract Documents, Surety guarantees that Bidder forfeits the Bond Sum to City. Any notice to Surety may be given in the manner specified in the Contract and delivered or transmitted to Surety as follows:

3. Attn: Edgar EsquivelAddress: 3003 Oak Road, Suite 200 City/State/Zip: Walnut Creek CA 94597
Phone: 925-658-9262_________________
Fax:Email:
925-256-8760
[email protected]
Duration and Waiver. If Bidder fulfills its obligations under Section 2, above, then this obligation will be null and void; otherwise, it will remain in full force and effect for 60 days following the bid opening or until this Bid Bond is returned to Bidder, whichever occurs first.

Surety waives the provisions of Civil Code §§ 2819 and 2845.

4. BID BOND

Page 19 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
March 27 25
812
This Bid Bond is entered into and effective on March 12 , 2025 SURETY:
tl Insurance CompanyHarco
Business Name
s / March 12,2025
Date
Charles M. Griswold
Name, Title(Attach Acknowledgment with Notary Seal and Power of Attorney) BIDDER:Specialty Construction, Inc.

Business Name
s/ March 27, 2025
Date
Rudolph . Bachmann, President/Secretary
Name, Title

END OF BID BOND

BID BOND

Page 20 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project24-S12
2024 Form
813
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the Identity of the Individual who signed the document to which this certificate Is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County Of Santa Clara
On March 12.2025
Date
personally appeared _
))
before me, P. K. Simicich, Notary Public
Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
Charles M. Griswold
Name(s) of Signers)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature® on the instrument the person®, or the entity upon behalf of which the person® acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hpnd and official seal.
wt......ih, ..ai.

I P. K. SIMICICH
I /fe ’■ raw®. Notary Public • California
Santa Clara County
‘ Commission It 2460771
My Comm, Expires Sep 21, 2027
iX
plm 5
II
i
Signature
Signature of Notary Public
Place Notary Seal Above
-------------------------------------------------------- OPTIONAL--------------------------------------------------------- Though tills section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:________
Number of Pages:

Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signers)
Signer’s Name: ________________
□ Corporate Officer — Title®:_____□ Partner — □ Limited □ General □ Individual
□ Trustee□ Other: _
Signer Is Representing:

Document Date:

Signers) Other Than Named Above:

Signer’s Name: ________________________
□ Corporate Officer — Title®:____________
□ Partner — □ Limited □ General
□ Attorney in Fact
□ Guardian or Conservator
□ Individual
□ Trustee
□ Other: „
Sign®1
Is Representing:
□ Attorney in Fact□ Guardian or Conservator
©2014 National Notary Association • www.NationaiNotary.oig • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 814
Bond # Bid Bond POWER OF ATTORNEY

HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Member companies of IAT Insurance Group, Headquartered: 702 Oberlin Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and having their principal offices located respectively in the cities of Rolling Meadows, Illinois and Newark, New Jersey, do hereby constitute and appoint
VINCENT M. SCOLARI, DAVID J, BACHAN, CHARLES M. GRISWOLD, WENDY R. PASTORA, PATRICIA K.

SIMICICH, YESENIA RIVERA
Watsonville, CA
their true and lawful attomey(s)-in-fact to execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf as surety, any and all bonds and undertakings, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, which are or may be allowed, required or permitted by law, statute, rule, regulation, contract or otherwise, and the execution of such instrument(s) in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon the said HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by their regularly elected officers at their principal offices.

This Power of Attorney is executed, and may be revoked, pursuant to and by authority of the By-Laws of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY and is granted underand by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly held on the 13th day of December, 2018 and by the Board of Directors of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting held on the 13th day of December, 2018. “RESOLVED, that (1) the Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President, Vice President, or Secretary of the Corporation shall have the power to appoint, and to revoke the appointments of, Attorneys-in-Fact or agents with power and authority as defined or limited in their respective powers of attorney, and to execute on behalf of the Corporation and affix the Corporation's seal thereto, bonds, undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other written obligations in the nature thereof or related thereto; and (2) any such Officers of the Corporation may appoint and revoke the appointments of joint-control custodians, agents for acceptance of process, and Attomeys-in-fact with authority to execute waivers and consents on behalf of the Corporation; and (3) the signature of any such Officer of the Corporation and the Corporation's seal may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or certification given for the execution of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, contract of indemnity or other written obligation in the nature thereof or related thereto, such signature and seals when so used whether heretofore or hereafter, being hereby adopted by the Corporation as the original signature of such officer and the original seal of the Corporation, to be valid and binding upon the Corporation with the same force and effect as though manually affixed."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY have each executed and attested these presents on this 31st day of December, 2018

STATE OF NEW JERSEY &
County of Essex

STATE OF ILLINOIS
County of Cook
If SEAL o
•V
Kenneth Chapman
Executive Vice President, Harco National Insurance Company and International Fidelity Insurance Company
....

On this 31st day of December, 2018 , before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally known, and, being by me duly sworn, said he is the therein described and authorized officer of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seals affixed to said instrument are the Corporate Seals of said Companies; that the said Corporate Seals and his signature were duly affixed by order of the Boards of Directors of said Companies.

A^-PoL'
/o *OM**\\$
\
<-
'
e
(/avP
a*®;
''Hi!!.!**'
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed my Official Seal, at the City of Newark, New Jersey the day and year first above written.
: w
Shirelle A. Outley a Notary Public of New Jersey V
My Commission Expires April 4, 2023
<5

CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned officer of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of the Power of Attorney and affidavit, and the copy of the Sections of the By-Laws of said Companies as set forth in said Power of Attorney, with the originals on file in the home office of said companies, and that the same are correct transcripts thereof, and of the whole of the said originals, and that the said Power of Attorney has not been revoked and is now in full force and effect.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand on this day,March 12, 2025 A01756
Irene Martins, Assistant Secretary
815
Bid Bond
___________(“Bidder") has submitted a
(“Bid"), to City of Soledad (“City") for
work on the Recycled Water Conveyance Project (“Project"). Under this duly executed bid bond , its surety (“Surety”),
are bound to City as obligee in the penal sum of ten percent of the maximum amount of the Bid (the “Bond Sum"). Bidder and Surety bind themselves and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, as follows:
bid, dated 20
(“Bid Bond"), Bidder as Principal and

1. General. If Bidder is awarded the Contract for the Project, Bidder will enter into the Contract with City in accordance with the terms of the Bid.

Submittals. Within ten days following issuance of the Notice of Potential Award to Bidder, Bidder must submit to City the following:

2. 2.1 Contract. The executed Contract, using the form provided by City in the Project contract documents (“Contract Documents”);

2.2 Payment Bond. A payment bond for 100% of the maximum Contract Price, executed by a surety licensed to do business in the State of California using the Payment Bond form included with the Contract Documents; Performance Bond. A performance bond for 100% of the maximum Contract Price, executed by a surety licensed to do business in the State of California using the Performance Bond form included with the Contract Documents;

2.3 2.4 Insurance. The insurance certificate(s) and endorsement(s) required by the Contract Documents;
Certificates of Reported Compliance. Valid Certificates of Reported Compliance for its fleet and its listed Subcontractors, if applicable, in accordance with the In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation (13 CCR § 2449 et seq.) (“Off-Road Regulation"), if the Project involves the use of vehicles subject to the Off-Road Regulation; and any other documents required by the Instructions to Bidders or Notice of Potential Award.

3. Attn:_______
Address: ___
City/State/Zip:

Phone: ____Fax: _______
Email: ______
Duration and Waiver. If Bidder fulfills its obligations under Section 2, above, then this obligation will be null and void; otherwise, it will remain in full force and effect for 60 days following the bid opening or until this Bid Bond is returned to Bidder, whichever occurs first.

Surety waives the provisions of Civil Code §§ 2819 and 2845.

4. BID BOND

Page 19 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
816
This Bid Bond is entered into and effective on 20
SURETY:

Business Name
si
Date
Name, Title
(Attach Acknowledgment with Notary Seal and Power of Attorney) BIDDER:

Business Names /
Date
Name, Title

END OF BID BOND

BID BOND

Page 20 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
817
Bidder's References
(TO BE INCLUDED WITH BID)
The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for three public agencies and/or private sector firms for which BIDDER has completed similar work within the past 10 years;

1. Monterey One Water, 5 Harris Court, Building D, Monterey, CA 93940 Name and Address of Owner
Tom Kouretas/(831) 883-6178
Name and telephone number of person familiar with project Pure Water Monterey Groundwater Replenishment Project - Injection Well Facilities, Phase 2: Drilling, development, & equipping or 8 each water wells tor monitoring of aqutter levels ana re-injection of recycled water into the aquifer. Site grading & development of multiple well sites. Furnish & installation of multiple ductile iron water lines from 6" to i 8” in diameter. Urading & m i« aoc ac i improvements for a recharge basin. Construction of electrical control building complete with medium voltage switchgear & motor *1
1 control center as well as..instrumen|aijnn including integration with owners existing SCADA sysle Contract Amount t ype of Work
02/12/2021
"bate completed

2. City of A venal, 919 Skyline Boulevard, Avenal, CA 93204 Name and Address of Owner
Brian Skaggs (Summer’s Engineering. Inc.) / (559) 582-9237 Name and telephone number of person familiar with project 18" Water Transmission Pipeline Replacement: Installation of 18” water line and appurtenances with valves.

Type of Work
$6 601,865.55
Contract Amount
05/2024
Date completed

3. Sunnyslope County Water District, 3570 Airline Highway, Hollister, CA 95023 N ame and Address of Owner
Rob Hillebrecht / (831) 637-4670
Name and telephone number of person familiar with project Crosstown Pipeline Project: Water pipeline installation, site grading; repair of roads, walkways; modifications to several existing structures; construction of a new booster pump station with enclosed building; new electric control $5,246,998 centers, and new electric service: construction of a new chemical feed system.

Contract Amount Type of Work
10/2019
Date completed

BIDDER'S REFERENCE

Page 24 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
24-S12
2024 Form
818
Rfi
W
JSt; 1921
5E

CITY OF SOLEDAD

SOLEDAD, CALIFORNIA

RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT
CLIENT PROJECT NO. 24-S12
ADDENDUM NO. 1
TO THE

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
MARCH 11, 2025
Digitally signed by Jonathon P. Marshall
Contact Into: Carotto Engineers, Inc*
Date: 2025.03.11 t3:02jE74pr0QJ
ff
,^9-'
P' w0/2r
\V
> m r~
n
\top
iXIa: 6 No. 73265
★ r
tp
II
1401 FULTON STREET, SUITE 802 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721 P 559-436-6616 pw://Carolb/Documents/CA/Soledad/202765-1000QG/Q4 Design/02 Deliverables/04 Addenda/AD1/_Addendum1.docx 819
Bidders on the above-named project are hereby notified that the Bidding Documents are modified as indicated below. Bidders are required to acknowledge receipt of this Addendum in the space provided in the Bid Proposal.

This Addendum shall become part of the Contract and provisions of the Contract apply.

SPECIFICATIONS
The following sections are modified as indicated below.

1. SECTION 01140 - WORK RESTRICTIONS:
a. REPLACE section in its entirety with the attached section.

2. SECTION 01220 - MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT:
a. REPLACE section in its entirety with the attached section.

3. SECTION 01500 - TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS:
a. REPLACE section in its entirety with the attached section.

4. SECTION 02552 - TEMPORARY BYPASS PUMPING:
a. REPLACE section in its entirety with the attached section.

5. SECTION 02952 - PAVEMENT RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION:
a. REPLACE section in its entirety with the attached section.

March 11, 2025 - Addendum No. 1 202765
pw://Carollo/Documents/CA/Soledad/202765-100Q00/04 0esign/02 OeliverablesM Add8nda/AD1/_Aridenclum1 ,docx 820
' ■
c
March 11,2025All Bidders
Addendum Date:To:

Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Addendum No. 1
Project:

Subject:

This Addendum is issued for informational and clarification purposes:

Questions and Responses to Q&A Set 1:

Question 1: Who is responsible for quality control plans and testing? Response: See Section 01450for Quality Control Requirements.

Question 2: Can temporary asphalt stay in place longer than 30 days if it is hot mix? Response: See Addendum No. 1
Question 3: Will pre-cast be accepted for the wet well? Response: No
Question 4: Are there any DBE, DVBE, or Buy America requirements? Response: No
Question 5: What is the cost associated with the permits that the contractor will be responsible for? Will these costs be reimbursable/ can an allowance be provided? Response: See Addendum No. 1
Question 6: Is the contractor responsible for providing surveyed as-builts by a professional land surveyor?
Response: See Section 01722for record drawings and documents survey requirements.

Question 7: Who is responsible for construction water for the conditioning of backfill? Who is responsible for hydrostatic testing of water mains?
Response: See Addendum 1 for obtaining construction water. See Section 02009for piping system testing requirements.Question 8: Please provide a geotechnical report.

Response: The geotechnical report will be added to PlanetBids as a reference document.

Question 9: Please provide existing flows rates on the sewer lines.

Response: See Addendum 1
248 Main Street, P.O. Box 156. Soledad. CA 93960 □ Phone (831) 223-5000 * Fax: (831) 678-3965 821
Question 10: Confirm that all sewer laterals that need to be CCTV inspected are shown on the plans.

Response: See Note 21 on Drawing Number 00G04.

Question 11: Will the contractor be required to use a subcontractor for SUE services or can this work be performed in-house?Response: Minimum SUE qualifications are provided in Section 02280. The Contractor can perform SUE work if the Contractor meets these qualifications.

Question 12: Please confirm trench backfill materials for trenches in streets and in farm fields. Will native backfill be accepted?
Response: See Section 02318 for backfill material requirements.

Question 13: Please provide depth & flow of existing 27” sewer adjacent to the proposed transmission main.

Response: Available information is provided on the drawings.

Question 14: Sheets C-01 through C-04 note existing sewer force and recycled water mains to be protected and abandoned in place. If these mains are encountered during excavation, can they be removed? Or is the intent to protect in place without disturbance.

Response: If the existing pipelines are found in a different location than shown on the drawings it will be a changed condition and addressed at the time of the changed condition.

Question 15: Will an approved equal manufacturer be accepted for the booter station? Response: Contractors shall bid the project with the listed manufacturers.

Issued by:

Alex C. Ramos, Assistant Engineer
248 Main Street, P.O. Box 156, Soledad, CA 93960 * Phone (831) 223-5000 ■* Fax: (831) 678-3965 822
e m
Sfl
|SE flsgji

CITY OF SOLEDAD

SOLEDAD, CALIFORNIA

RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT
CLIENT PROJECT NO. 24-S12
ADDENDUM NO. 2
TO THE

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
MARCH 14, 2025
Digitally signed by Jonathon P. Marshall
Contact Into: Caroito Engi
Date: 2025.03 14 16:16*4*)7W
I
iFj
C\ r*
1 >| m
r* xj
^ioF cti&r
O A? i»1
cc O No. 73265
★ r
<p
II
1401 FULTON STREET, SUITE 802 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721 P 559-436-6616 pw://CarDllo/Documents/CA/Soledad/202765-100000/04 Design/02 Oeiiverabtes/04 Addenda/AD2/„Adden<Jum2,<iocx 823
Bidders on the above-named project are hereby notified that the Bidding Documents are modified as indicated below. Bidders are required to acknowledge receipt of this Addendum in the space provided in the Bid Proposal.

This Addendum shall become part of the Contract and provisions of the Contract apply.

SPECIFICATIONS
The following sections are modified as indicated below.

1. SOLEDAD RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT - VOLUME 1 OF 4 - FRONT END SPECIFICATIONS:
a. REPLACE the volume in its entirety with the attached.

March 14, 2025 - Addendum No. 2 202765
pw://Carollo/Documents/CA/Soletiad/202765-100000/04 Deagn/02 Deliverabtes/04 Addenda/A02/_Addendum2.docx 824
RH s
50 cs
t {
lilS

CITY OF SOLEDAD

SOLEDAD, CALIFORNIA

RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT
CLIENT PROJECT NO. 24-S12
ADDENDUM NO. 3
TO THE

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
MARCH 21, 2025
Digitally signed by Jonathon P. Marshal!
Contact Info: Carollo Engineers, ing,
Date: 2025.03.21 10:10: 7*00'
W m\\
Ilo No. 73265 £lsj
* >■-
r7^./y
a
1401 FULTON STREET, SUITE 802 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721 P 559-436-6616 pw://Carollo/Documents/CA/Soledad/202765-100000/04 Design/02 Deliverabies/04 Addenda/AD3/_Addendum3.docx 825
Bidders on the above-named project are hereby notified that the Bidding Documents are modified as indicated below. Bidders are required to acknowledge receipt of this Addendum in the space provided in the Bid Proposal.

This Addendum shall become part of the Contract and provisions of the Contract apply.

SPECIFICATIONS
The following sections are modified as indicated below.

1. SECTION 02001 - COMMON WORK RESULTS FOR GENERAL PIPING:
a. REPLACE section in its entirety with the attached section.

2. SECTION 02706 - POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE: PRESSURE:
a. REPLACE section in its entirety with the attached section.

PREFABRICATED PUMPING SYSTEM:
a. REPLACE section in its entirety with the attached section.

3. SECTION 11321

DRAWINGS
The following drawings are modified as indicated below.

1. DRAWING 00C65:
a. REPLACE drawing in its entirety with the attached drawing.

2. DRAWING 00C66:
a. REPLACE drawing in its entirety with the attached drawing.

3. DRAWING L9.1:
a. REPLACE drawing in its entirety with the attached drawing.

4. DRAWING 00S01:
a. REPLACE drawing in its entirety with the attached drawing.

5. DRAWING 00S02:
a. REPLACE drawing in its entirety with the attached drawing.

6. DRAWING 00TC03:
a. REPLACE drawing in its entirety with the attached drawing.

March 21, 2025 - Addendum No. 3 202765
pw://Carollo/Documents/CA/Soledad/202765-100000/04 Design/02 Detiverattes/04 Addenda/AD3/„Addendum3.docx 826

SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION
UnanimousWritten Consent of Directors
In Lieu of Meeting of The Board of Directors
Specialty Construction, Inc.

The undersigned, being the directors of the corporation, acting pursuant to the authority of section 307 of the California General Corporations Law, hereby adopt the following recitals and resolutions, effective on the date set forth below.

WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the corporation will enter into contracts with third parties in conducting the business of the corporation, it is RESOLVED, that Rudolph C. Bachmann, President of corporation, is hereby authorized to sign any and all contracts for and on behalf of the corporation.
\
Rudolpl\§. Bachmann
Director
Dated: January 1, 2014
License A, B 619361
645 Clarion Court * San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Telephone: 805/543-1706 * Administrative Fax:805/543-1712 * Estimating Fax:805/543-1722 827
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certification is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of San Luis Obispo )
)
On May 25, 2017 before me, Traci L Huss, notary public, personally appeared Rudolph C.

Bachmann. who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

J \
TRACI L. HUSS
Commission # 2099960
Notary Public - California 1
1 San Luis Obispo County |
1 My Comm. Expires Feb 20,2019 C
Notary Signature
Unanimous Written Consent of Directors dated 01/01/2014 828

SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION
UnanimousWritten Consent of Directors
In Lieu of Meeting ofTheBoard of Directors
Specialty Construction, Inc.

WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the corporation will enter into contracts with third parties in conducting the business of the corporation, it is RESOLVED, that Thomas Seidel, Vice President, is hereby authorized to sign any and all contracts for and on behalf of the corporation.

Rudolph C. Bachmann
Director ~
Dated: September 12, 2024
License A, B 619361
645 Clarion Court * San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Telephone: 805/543-1706 * Administrative Fax:805/543-1712 * Estimating Fax:805/543-1722 829
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE §1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of San Luis Obispo
)
)
On September 12, 2024 before me, Sheri A. Shamblin, Notary Public Date Here insert Name and Title of the Officer
personally appeared Rudolph C. Bachmartn
Name(s) of Stgner(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature® on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

SHERI A. SHAMBUN
Notary Public - California
i|fp] San tuii Obispo County
Commission * 2352542
My Comm. Expires Mar 21, 2025
\
i
i Signature \U .Y
IS 'Ac
7 Signature of-Notary Public
>8
£ i
Place Notary Seal Above
---------------------------------------------------------OPTIONAL--------------------------------------------------------- Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document
„ . Unanimous Wrilten Consent or Directors In Lieu , _ , Title or Type of Document: of Meeting of the Board of Directors (Thomas Seidel) Document Date: 9/12/2024 Number of Pages: 2 Signers) Other Than Named Above: N/A Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer’s Name: Rudolph C. Bachmann
□ Corporate Officer — Title(s):___
□ Partner — □ Limited □ General
□ Individual
□ Trustee
S other: Director
Signer Is Representing: Specialty Construction, Inc.

Signer’s Name: WA____________________
□ Corporate Officer — Title(s):___________
□ Partner — □ Limited □ General
□ Attorney in Fact
□ Guardian or Conservator
□ Individual
□ Trustee
□ Other: _
Signer is Representing: N/A.
□ Attorney in Fact
□ Guardian or Conservator
830
1* CONTRACTORS
UL.3 STATE LICENSE BOARD

ACTIVE LICENSE
r
619361 CORPSPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION INC

DBA SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION
A B HA2
■ ,1
o. 02/28/2027 www.cslbca.gov s&
831

Page 1 of 2 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Change Order No. 1
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
May 21, 2025

TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOLEDAD
AND SPECIALITY CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR THE RECYCLED

WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Soledad, a municipal corporation of the State of California entered into an agreement dated May 21, 2025 with Specialty Construction Inc. for a total price of $13,780,764.80 for the Recycled Water Conveyance Project.

1. REASON FOR CHANGE.

Lowest bid amount submitted by Specialty Construction Inc. (SCI) exceeded the budget available to the City for use on this project. The City and Specialty Construction Inc. has reduced the scope of work that will allow the City to go forward with the completion of roughly 90% of the project and still maintain the minimum recycled water offset required by the grant.

2. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE.

The reduced scope of work will result in a deductive amount of $1,504,419.05 for a new contract amount of $12,276,345.75 as stated in the attached revised bid item summary and Change Order #01 scope provided by SCI.

3. CONTRACT COST SUMMARY.

Original Contract Base Bid Amount $13,780,764.80
Deductive Change Order #1 ($1,504,419.05)
New Contract Total $12,276,345.75

4. ADJUSTMENT IN TIME OF COMPLETION.

The contract time is reduced by 14 calendar days for an updated contract time of 536 calendar days.

Exhibit B to Resolution No. 6232
832

Page 2 of 2 ends

Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Change Order No. 1
APPROVED:
____________________________________ _________________
Donald T. Wilcox, Public Works Director Date
City of Soledad
____________________________________ __________________ Megan Hunter, City Manager Date
City of Soledad
ACCEPTED:

We, the undersigned contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.

Specialty Construction Inc.
____________________________________ __________________ By: Date
END OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
May 09, 2025
833
5/7/2025
Item
No. Description
Unit of
Measure Quantity Unit Price Total Quantity Total Difference Notes 1 Mobilization and Demobilization LS 1 503,000.00 $ 503,000.00 $ 1 485,000.00 $ $ (18,000.00) Reduced by $18,000 for eliminated cost and labor
loaded schedule
2 Worker Protection and Safety/Shoring pursuant to
Section 6700-6708 of the California Labor Code, and all applicable safety orders and permits LS 1 38,300.00 $ 38,300.00 $ 1 38,300.00 $ $ - 3 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 494,000.00 $ 494,000.00 1 $ 491,730.00 $ (2,270.00) Reduced by $2,270 for deleted alignments 4 Utility Potholing EA 353 $ 992.00 $ 350,176.00 333 $ 330,336.00 $ (19,840.00) Reduction in 20 potholes due to deleted
alignments
5 Dewatering LS 1 $ 77,000.00 $ 77,000.00 1 $ 77,000.00 6 Sewer Main CCTV Investigations LS 1 $ 5,300.00 $ 5,300.00 1 $ 5,300.00 7 Sewer Lateral CCTV Investigations-Pre-Construction LS 1 $ 56,000.00 $ 56,000.00 1 $ 54,515.00 $ (1,485.00) Reduced by 990 LF due to deleted alignments 8 Sewer Lateral CCTV Investigations-Post-Construction LS 1 $ 56,000.00 $ 56,000.00 0 $ - $ (56,000.00) Value Engineering Delete 9 Pipe Installation- Transmission Main LF 3756 $ 147.00 $ 552,132.00 3756 $ 552,132.00 10 Pipe Installation-Alignment A-8 inch-Pipeline LF 3793 $ 247.00 $ 936,871.00 3793 $ 936,871.00 11 Pipe Installation-Alignment A-6 inch Pipeline LF 2318 $ 243.00 $ 563,274.00 2318 $ 563,274.00 12 Little League Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 41,000.00 $ 41,000.00 1 $ 41,000.00 13 Gabilan Elementary School Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 1 $ 38,000.00 14 San Vicente Elementary School Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 83,000.00 $ 83,000.00 1 $ 83,000.00 15 Pipe Installation-Alignment A1 LF 467 $ 194.00 $ 90,598.00 467 $ 90,598.00 16 Bill Ramus Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 1 $ 27,000.00 17 Pipe Installation-Alignment A2 LF 348 $ 218.00 $ 75,864.00 348 $ 75,864.00 18 Jesse Gallardo Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 1 $ 65,000.00 19 Pipe Installation- Alignment A3 LF 2495 $ 193.00 $ 481,535.00 2495 $ 481,535.00 20 Vosti Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 1 $ 70,000.00 21 Pipe Installation-Alignment A4 LF 54 $ 500.00 $ 27,000.00 54 $ 27,000.00 22 Main Street Middle School Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 127,000.00 $ 127,000.00 1 $ 127,000.00 23 Pipe Installation-Alignment A5 LF 373 $ 198.00 $ 73,854.00 373 $ 73,854.00 24 Orchard Lane Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 8,400.00 $ 8,400.00 1 $ 8,400.00 25 Pipe Installation-Alignment A6 LF 882 $ 199.00 $ 175,518.00 882 $ 175,518.00 26 Ramirez Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 1 $ 35,000.00 27 Pipe Installation – Alignment B – 8-inch Pipeline LF 2494 $ 267.00 $ 665,898.00 2494 $ 665,898.00 28 Pipe Installation – Alignment B – 6-inch Pipeline LF 2589 $ 241.00 $ 623,949.00 2589 $ 623,949.00 29 Pipe Installation – Alignment B – 4-inch Pipeline LF 711 $ 210.00 $ 149,310.00 711 $ 149,310.00 30 Lum Memorial Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 1 $ 21,000.00 31 Pipe Installation – Alignment B1 LF 313 $ 226.00 $ 70,738.00 313 $ 70,738.00 32 Joe Ledesma Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 1 $ 35,000.00 33 Pipe Installation – Alignment B2 LF 385 $ 200.00 $ 77,000.00 385 $ 77,000.00 34 Frank Ledesma Elementary School Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 77,000.00 $ 77,000.00 1 $ 77,000.00 35 Pipe Installation – Alignment B3 LF 1161 $ 175.00 $ 203,175.00 1161 $ 203,175.00 36 Soledad High School Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 115,000.00 $ 115,000.00 1 $ 115,000.00 37 Pipe Installation – Alignment B4 LF 1462 $ 216.00 $ 315,792.00 1462 $ 315,792.00 38 Toledo Park Meter Connection LS 1 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 0 $ - $ (18,500.00) Scope deleted from the project. 39 Jack Franscioni Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 69,500.00 $ 69,500.00 1 $ 69,500.00 40 Pipe Installation – Alignment B5 LF 568 $ 172.00 $ 97,696.00 0 $ - $ (97,696.00) Scope deleted from the project. 41 San Antonio Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 0 $ - $ (30,000.00) Scope deleted from the project. 42 Pipe Installation – Alignment B6 LF 422 $ 218.00 $ 91,996.00 0 $ - $ (91,996.00) Scope deleted from the project. 43 Santa Barbara Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 36,500.00 $ 36,500.00 0 $ - $ (36,500.00) Scope deleted from the project. 44 Pipe Installation – Alignment B7 LF 1211 $ 206.00 $ 249,466.00 1211 $ 249,466.00 45 Rose Ferrero Elementary School Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 103,000.00 $ 103,000.00 1 $ 103,000.00 46 Pipe Installation – Alignment B8 LF 215 $ 242.00 $ 52,030.00 215 $ 52,030.00 Original Contract CCO_01 Deductions
Change Order #01 Summary
834
Item
No. Description
Unit of
Measure Quantity Unit Price Total Quantity Total Difference Notes Original Contract CCO_01 Deductions
47 Peverini Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 1 $ 50,000.00 48 Pipe Installation – Alignment B9 LF 330 $ 220.00 $ 72,600.00 330 $ 72,600.00 49 Blas Santana Park Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 1 $ 35,000.00 50 Veteran's Park RW Connection LS 1 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 1 $ 21,000.00 51 Combination Air Valve Assemblies EA 28 $ 12,000.00 $ 336,000.00 26 $ 312,000.00 $ (24,000.00) Reduction of 2 EA due to deleted alignments 52 Blow-off Assemblies EA 20 $ 14,250.00 $ 285,000.00 18 $ 256,500.00 $ (28,500.00) Reduction of 2 EA due to deleted alignments 53 Dual Combination Air Valve Assemblies EA 2 $ 27,000.00 $ 54,000.00 2 $ 54,000.00 54 Pump Station-Grading LS 1 $ 283,000.00 $ 283,000.00 1 $ 283,000.00 55 Construct Pump Station Wet Well LS 1 $ 258,000.00 $ 258,000.00 1 $ 258,000.00 56 Construct Connection at Existing Reclaimed Pump
Station Wet Well LS 1 36,000.00 $ 36,000.00 $ 1 36,000.00 $ 57 Pump Station-Prefabricated Pumping System LS 1 $ 1,143,000.00 $ 1,143,000.00 1 $ 1,143,000.00 58 Pump Station – Electrical, Instrumentation, and Controls LS 1 $ 385,000.00 $ 385,000.00 1 $ 385,000.00 59 Commissioning the Pump Station LS 1 $ 19,000.00 $ 19,000.00 1 $ 19,000.00 60 Pump Station – 24-inch Recycled Water Pipeline LF 237 $ 974.00 $ 230,838.00 237 $ 230,838.00 61 Pump Station – 12-inch Recycled Water Pipeline LF 68 $ 563.00 $ 38,284.00 68 $ 38,284.00 62 Pump Station – 30-inch Overflow Pipeline LF 51 $ 2,066.00 $ 105,366.00 51 $ 105,366.00 63 WRF Temporary Fire Water Supply LS 1 $ 44,000.00 $ 44,000.00 1 $ 44,000.00 64 Existing RW Connection South of Market St LS 1 $ 15,500.00 $ 15,500.00 1 $ 15,500.00 65 Existing RW Connection South of Goldenrod St LS 1 $ 15,500.00 $ 15,500.00 1 $ 15,500.00 66 Gabilan Landscaping Retrofit LS 1 $ 88,000.00 $ 88,000.00 1 $ 88,000.00 67 Front Street Swivel-Ell LS 1 $ 218,000.00 $ 218,000.00 1 $ 218,000.00 68 Gabilan Street Swivel-Ell LS 1 $ 152,000.00 $ 152,000.00 1 $ 152,000.00 69 Cross-Connection Testing LS 1 $ 36,000.00 $ 36,000.00 1 $ 36,000.00 70 Remove/Replace Main Street Sewer LF 1286 $ 223.00 $ 286,778.00 1286 $ 286,778.00 71 Sanitary Sewage Bypass Pumping LS 1 $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 1 $ 12,500.00 72 Slurry Seal – Monterey Street SY 4603 $ 4.40 $ 20,253.20 0 $ - $ (20,253.20) Scope removed from this project. 73 Slurry Seal – North Street SY 6144 $ 4.40 $ 27,033.60 0 $ - $ (27,033.60) Scope removed from this project. 74 Slurry Seal – Dixie Street SY 1110 $ 4.40 $ 4,884.00 0 $ - $ (4,884.00) Scope removed from this project. 75 Slurry Seal – Palm Street SY 2159 $ 4.40 $ 9,499.60 0 $ - $ (9,499.60) Scope removed from this project. 76 Slurry Seal – Oak Street SY 6011 $ 4.40 $ 26,448.40 0 $ - $ (26,448.40) Scope removed from this project. 77 Slurry Seal – State Street SY 2698 $ 4.40 $ 11,871.20 0 $ - $ (11,871.20) Scope removed from this project. 78 Slurry Seal – Park Street SY 1960 $ 4.40 $ 8,624.00 0 $ - $ (8,624.00) Scope removed from this project. 79 Slurry Seal – Orchard Lane SY 2161 $ 4.40 $ 9,508.40 0 $ - $ (9,508.40) Scope removed from this project. 80 Slurry Seal – Market Street SY 1532 $ 4.40 $ 6,740.80 0 $ - $ (6,740.80) Scope removed from this project. 81 Slurry Seal – West Street SY 4488 $ 4.40 $ 19,747.20 0 $ - $ (19,747.20) Scope removed from this project. 82 Slurry Seal – Gabilan Drive SY 19658 $ 4.40 $ 86,495.20 0 $ - $ (86,495.20) Scope removed from this project. 83 Slurry Seal – Prado Drive SY 2109 $ 4.40 $ 9,279.60 0 $ - $ (9,279.60) Scope removed from this project. 84 Slurry Seal – La Colina Street SY 2241 $ 4.40 $ 9,860.40 0 $ - $ (9,860.40) Scope removed from this project. 85 Slurry Seal – Vista Avenue SY 5718 $ 4.40 $ 25,159.20 0 $ - $ (25,159.20) Scope removed from this project. 86 Slurry Seal – Santa Barbara SY 1383 $ 4.40 $ 6,085.20 0 $ - $ (6,085.20) Scope removed from this project. 87 Slurry Seal – Entrada Drive SY 3473 $ 4.40 $ 15,281.20 0 $ - $ (15,281.20) Scope removed from this project. 88 Slurry Seal - Front Street and West Street Intersection SY 649 $ 4.40 $ 2,855.60 0 $ - $ (2,855.60) Scope removed from this project. 89 Pavement Striping LS 1 $ 412,000.00 $ 412,000.00 1 $ 47,118.75 $ (364,881.25) Scope changed to trench area stripe restoration
with paint.
90 Water Lowering for 4-inch pipe EA 1 $ 11,100.00 $ 11,100.00 1 $ 11,100.00 91 Water Lowering for 6-inch pipe EA 1 $ 11,800.00 $ 11,800.00 1 $ 11,800.00 92 Water Lowering for 8-inch pipe EA 1 $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 1 $ 12,500.00 93 All other work required to complete the project that is not included in Bid Items 1 – 92 LS 1 660,000.00 $ 660,000.00 $ 1 660,000.00 $

93.1 Dirt Stockpile at WWTP LS 1 $ (67,000.00) $ (67,000.00)

93.2 QC Compaction/Concrete Cylinders/Special Inspection Testing LS 1 (348,124.00) $ $ (348,124.00)
Total $ 13,780,764.80 $12,276,345.75 $ (1,504,419.05)
835

License A, B 619361
645 Clarion Court * San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Telephone: 805/543-1706 * Administrative Fax:805/543-1712 * Estimating Fax:805/543-1722 May 7, 2025
Zachary Teske
Wallace Group
612 Clarion Court
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Re: Recycled Water Conveyance, Soledad
Subject: CCO Request – PCO 001 Value Engineering and Scope Reductions Dear Mr. Teske,
Specialty Construction Inc. (SCI) has prepared the following change order request based off the discussions between SCI, Wallace Group and the City of Soledad in order to help meet the City’s construction budget.

The following is a breakdown of the changes and their associated price changes:

Value Engineering:
• Eliminate Cost and Labor Loaded Schedule (Bid Item #1) - <$18,000> • Spoils Disposal – City to take all clean soil spoils at Sewer Plant (Spread Throughout Pipe Items) - <$67,000>
• City provides all QA Compaction Testing/Concrete Cylinders/Special Inspections (Bid Item #93) - <$348,124>
Scope Reductions:
• Bid Item #8 – Sewer Lateral CCTV Investigations – Post Construction - <$56,000>
• Bid Item #38 – Toledo Park Meter Connection - <$18,500> • Bid Item #40 – Alignment B5 - <$97,696>
• Bid Item #41 –San Antonio Park Landscaping Retrofit - <$30,000> • Bid Item #42 – Alignment B6 - <$91,996>
• Bid Item #43 – Santa Barbara Landscaping Retrofit - <$36,500> • Bid Items #72-88 - Slurry Seal - <$299,626.80>
Items Affected by Above Scope Reductions:
• Bid Item #3 – Traffic Control (Reduced by Alignment B5/B6) - <$2,270> • Bid Item #4 – Utility Potholing (Reduced by 20 EA) - <$19,840> (Revision 1 - Updated Contract Amount)
836
CCO Request – PCO 01
5/7/25

Page 2 of 2 ends

License A, B 619361
645 Clarion Court * San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Telephone: 805/543-1706 * Administrative Fax:805/543-1712 * Estimating Fax:805/543-1722 • Bid Item #7 – Sewer Lateral CCTV Investigation (Reduced by 990 LF) - <$1,485>
• Bid Item #51 – Combination Air Valve Assemblies (Reduced by 2 EA) - <$24,000>
• Bid Item #52 – Blow Off Assemblies (Reduced by 2 EA) - <$28,500> • Bid Item #89 – Striping (Scope reduced to only restoration of striping disturbed by open trenching with paint, rather than thermoplastic) – <$364,881.25> The above items result in a total credit of <$1,504,419.05> which would bring the new contract total to $12,276,345.75.

Should you have any questions, or wish to further discuss this credit proposal, please feel free to give me a call at the earliest convenience.

Sincerely,
SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Jayden W. John
Jayden John
Civil Project Manager
CC: JS/TS/RA SCI
File: 25-013 - PCO 01
837
RESOLUTION NO. 6233

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLEDAD

APPROVING A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WALLACE GROUP

FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE

SOLEDAD RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEED $1,232,864
WHEREAS, the City of Soledad proposes to implement the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project; and,
WHEREAS, the Project generally includes constructing a new recycled water booster pump station and associated facilities, approximately five miles of 4-inch diameter to 12-inch diameter pressurized recycled water pipeline and appurtenances and retrofitting landscape irrigation systems at approximately twenty schools and parks within the City; and, WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the Council approved a contract with Specialty Construction, Inc. for construction of the City’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project; and, WHEREAS, the project requires full-time construction management including inspections for a 536-day project and over five miles of new pipelines trenched through existing city streets; and,
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2025, the City advertised on Planet Bids and in the Salinas Tribune a Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the City’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project, with a due date of January 24, 2025; and,
WHEREAS, four proposals were received, three of which were deemed responsive, and a five-member selection panel was assembled with internal and external members; and, WHEREAS, using the criteria established as advertised in the RFQ, the selection panel was unanimous with the selection of Wallace Group; and, WHEREAS, staff then met with Wallace Group to discuss their fee proposal in the amount of $1,474.919, which is based on their estimate of the level of effort expended to complete the project scope of work on a time and materials basis (no lump sum fees); and, WHEREAS, staff negotiated with Wallace to reduce their fee estimate to $1,232,864 which is 10% of the construction cost initially, with a budget review at 50% of project completion; and,
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Council approve the revised proposal from Wallace Group toward a Consulting Services Agreement for Construction Management & 838
Inspection Services for Soledad’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project; and, WHEREAS, the City’s standard agreement form will be used.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Soledad, that an Agreement with Wallace Group in the Amount of $1,232,864 to provide Construction Management & Inspection Services for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, as described in the Wallace Group Proposal dated May 7, 2025, a copy of which is attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and by reference incorporated herein, is hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to prepare an agreement incorporating said proposal and execute the same on behalf of the City of Soledad.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Soledad at a regular meeting duly held on the 21st day of May 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

ANNA M. VELAZQUEZ, Mayor
ATTEST:

MEGAN HUNTER, City Clerk
839
1001-0007 - City of Soledad – Recycled Water Conveyance Project (PP25-8349) Wallace Group Scope of Services (revised 5/7/25)
We have reviewed the list of services provided in Section 6.0 – Scope of Work provide in the RFP and have developed the list of services below that we will provide for this project in Tasks 1 through 8. In addition, we have attached a budget estimate table for each task and our hourly rate sheet.

Task 1: Bid Phase (Optional)
Bid Document Review and Assistance
 Perform a quality assurance review of the bid set documents and engineers estimate of probable cost and provide comments to the City  Provide bid support, including responding to bidder questions or supporting the City in the bid evaluation
Value Engineering Assistance
 Assist the City and Engineer of Record in the review and analysis of value engineering items to align the project scope with the available budget Task 2: Construction Management (CM) - Pre-Construction Phase Services Project Communication and Coordination
 Facilitate project communication and coordination with the City, the design team, emergency services, utility providers, property owners, the Contractor, and other stakeholders
 Perform kick off meeting with the City to introduce project team members, establish working relationships, and discuss key project components  Act as the point of contact for community members to contact with project concerns and work with the stakeholders to address these concerns in a timely manner
 Review contractors proposed notifications to property owners and other stakeholders effected
Procore: Construction Management Software
 Utilize Procore software for the project to handle all project documentation (RFIs, Submittals, Inspector Logs, Progress Payments, Photos, etc.) in a single, easy to use location
 Provide introduction to City staff if unfamiliar with the software  Distribute project information via Procore to the Project Team Pre-Construction Meeting
 Thoroughly review plans, specifications, environmental documents, construction cost estimate, and the Contractor’s completed bid form o Provide written technical memorandum identifying any concerns of risk to the City or design related issues
 Schedule meeting with project team, including contractor, design consultant, required City staff, and any required City vendors
 Prepare agenda and develop list of required submittals provided at least 5 days in advance of the meeting in coordination with City’s Project Manager  Provide sign in sheet and issue minutes following completion of the meeting Exhibit A to Resolution No. 6233
840
1001-0007 - City of Soledad – Recycled Water Conveyance Project (PP25-8349) Pre-Construction Photo and Video Documentation
 Collect pre-construction photos and videos of project site and adjacent areas just prior to the start of construction, with each photo stamped with the date and time
 Photos will be collected and maintained in Procore, available to the project team throughout construction, and included in the project close out documentation
 Review existing conditions and site constraints
Baseline Schedule
 Review the baseline schedule submitted, including critical path items, by the Contractor and accept when satisfactory
Submittal and Request for Information (RFI) Management
 Utilize Procore to track and review submittals and RFI’s from Contractor in coordination with the Engineer of Record
o We have budgeted for approximately 60 submittals and 40 RFIs  Assist contractor and design engineer in establishment of list of required submittals based on the plans and specifications
 Process RFIs and submittals in a timely manner and make available to project team
 Develop and maintain Submittal and RFI logs for easy reference and tracking for timely responses
 Maintain electronic copies within Procore
Community Outreach and Public Notification
 Review contractor submitted door-hangers to all residence along the route of construction announcing the upcoming construction work (Spanish and English)  Participate in neighborhood “corner meetings” to present to the attendees the upcoming work and to be point of contract for the residents affected Deliverables:

1. Reviewed Submittals and Submittal Log

2. Reviewed RFIs and RFI Log

3. Pre-Construction Photos

4. Pre-Construction Conference Agenda and Minutes
841
1001-0007 - City of Soledad – Recycled Water Conveyance Project (PP25-8349) Task 3: CM - Construction Phase
Based on the information provided in the RFP, we have assumed 290 working days for the Contractor to complete the work. We have budgeted for a single full time construction inspector for the full 290 working days and 24 hours/week of project management. This single inspector assumption is based on a maximum of two crews/two work locations at a single time, and if additional crews are mobilized, a second inspector may be warranted. We have budget an additional 40 days of full time inspection to account for busy construction days where multiple crews may be working at multiple locations, necessitating two inspectors.

Note, our field inspection time is fully dependent on the contractor’s schedule and activity duration, and every effort will be made to perform field inspections as efficiently as possible with any unused budget returned to the City.

Project Schedule & Weekly Construction Meeting
 Monitor overall project progress with respect to accepted Baseline Schedule  Review Contractors 3-Week Look Ahead Schedule and assist with forecasting and coordinate scheduling of testing and inspections
 Keep stakeholders informed of the construction schedule  Weekly Progress Meetings - Schedule, develop agenda, and minutes for meeting with Contractor, Construction Management Team, City staff, Design Team, and other necessary entities
 Complete a Weekly Statement of Working Days and distribute to the project team
Change Order Management
 Review and qualify Contractor requested change orders, including review of scope of work, proposed quantities, labor rates, and contractors mark up  Provide change orders for City’s review and acceptance prior to work taking place
 Establish and maintain files and documentation for use in change negotiations or potential claims
 Document conversations that could be significant in the event of a claim or dispute
Quantity Calculations and Progress Estimates
 Maintain quantity calculations throughout the project  Coordinate daily reports and quantities with the Contractor  Review monthly Request for Payment and recommend approval for payment to the City
 Collect delivery and materials tickets for project record Construction Observation
 Provide onsite observations and oversight during construction, hours/level of inspection to depend on construction activity phase
 Prepare inspection reports, including tracking labor, equipment, weather, observations/notes, quantities, and photos. Daily reports to be made available to the City’s Designated Representative via Procore or in PDF format 842
1001-0007 - City of Soledad – Recycled Water Conveyance Project (PP25-8349)  In addition to work shown on the plans, our observations and oversight will include:
o Traffic control implementation
o Review of Contractors BMPs for general stormwater compliance o Materials and Material Delivery
o Coordinate with Materials Testing Quality Assurance Subcontractor (Earth Systems)
o Review Contractor’s survey work and layout for general conformance  Report to the City when work is performed that is unsatisfactory, faulty, or does not conform to the Contract documents and advise on how the work should be remedied
 Inspector will help to coordinate notification of local agencies or other City Departments
 Review compliance with contract documents
 Record and report design modifications on “Inspectors As-Built Set”, and review Contractor’s as-built set to confirm remaining up to date Site Documentation
 Maintain photographic and written documentation throughout the project in Procore and available to the entire team
Stormwater Compliance and Permits
 Monitor stormwater protection measures throughout the project  Based on the contract documents, we have assumed that the SWPPP document will be managed by the Contractor and assuming responsibility for all QSP/QSD inspections and annual reporting
Safety
 Monitor Contractor’s safety practices for compliance with safety program  Utilize the following documents during field safety monitoring program:
o CAL-OSHA Construction safety orders
o Traffic Control Plan
o Contractor’s safety plan
 Work with the Contractor to resolve safety concerns on site  Advise City of observed or unresolved deficiencies
Final Inspection and Punch List
 Observe complete and near complete work for deficiencies  Establish and maintain punch list and track items to resolution  Coordinate with City staff and Engineer of Record to perform final milestone inspections and observe the finished work
Deliverables:

1. Weekly Construction Meeting Agendas and Minutes

2. Inspector Daily Logs and Photos

3. Progress Payment Reviews

4. Change Order/Force Account Documentation

5. Punch List
843
1001-0007 - City of Soledad – Recycled Water Conveyance Project (PP25-8349) Task 4: CM - Post-Construction Phase Services
Contract Close Out
 Recommend and approve final payment to the Contractor  Assist with the preparation and signing of the Acknowledgement of Construction Closeout and Release of Claims form
 Prepare Notice of Completion and send to City’s Designated Representative Record Drawings
 Review final redline as-built drawings as provided by the Contractor  Assist City and Design Engineer in review and completion of final certified record drawings
Project Closeout
 Assemble and deliver records, reports, certificates, pictures upon project completion
 Files to be delivered in electronic format (PDF)
 Assist City in the final project close out with the Contractor, including final payment and warranty certificates from the Contractor
Warranty Job Walk
 Schedule a meeting with the City project manager to review final inspection at least 10 days prior to the end of the warranty period Deliverables:

1. Weekly Construction Meeting Agendas and Minutes

2. Inspector Daily Logs and Photos

3. Progress Payment Reviews

4. Change Order/Force Account Documentation

5. Punch List
Task 5: QA Materials Testing & Geotechnical Services (EarthSystems)

Earth Systems will provide geotechnical, materials testing, and special inspection services for this project. Please reference attached scope of work and budget estimate proposal from Earth Systems for this project. Services will include:
 Earth Systems will attend a pre-construction meeting, as well as meetings for major work elements, as needed.
 Review material and quality control plan submittals are in conformance with project plans and specifications
 Earthwork Operations - Provide geotechnical inspection services during earthwork operations.
o Soils special inspection will be performed during site grading, structure backfill, utility backfill operations, excavation, and other miscellaneous site grading.
o Compaction testing on native soil, aggregate base, non-expansive backfill, utility backfill material, and asphalt during construction of the trench backfill and roadway restoration, landscape areas 844
1001-0007 - City of Soledad – Recycled Water Conveyance Project (PP25-8349)  Structural Special Inspections - Provide special inspection during structural concrete and rebar placement and anchor bolt installation. Sample the concrete and perform testing on the concrete compressive strength samples for wall and foundation pours
 Compaction test reports, final inspection and testing reports and Certified Payroll reports will be prepared and submitted as required.

Task 6: Labor Compliance (360PSM)
360PSM will provide labor compliance monitoring during the construction phase.

Please reference attached scope of work and budget estimate proposal from 360PSM for this project. Labor compliance scope of work will include:
 360PSM will attend a pre-construction meeting, as well as up to 20 weekly construction meetings
o Provide link and review with the contractor with a copy of “Contractors Guide to Prevailing Wage Requirements for Federally Assisted Construction Projects.
o Attend introductory meeting with contractors labor compliance personnel
 Perform labor compliance monitoring and generate monthly reports including:
o Review certified payroll forms as submitted by contractor and subcontractors
o Monitor subcontractors used for compliance with those listed at bid time
o Conduct field employee interviews to confirm worker classification and wage rate
o Review Fringe Benefit Statements and Training Fund Contribution Reports
o Issue monthly reports indicating comments and corrections, including review of corrections
Task 7: Environmental/Cultural Services (Denise Duffy & Associates) Denise Duffy and Associates (DD&A) will provide environmental and cultural resource services during the construction phase. Please reference attached scope of work and budget estimate proposal from DD&A for this project. Scope of work is based of the information provided in the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) provided in Exhibit B-4 and will generally include:
 Employee Education Program (BIO-1) – provide training to construction crew prior to on-site activities to cover biological and cultural resources that may be identified
o Tribal Cultural Monitor (TR-1) – will provide cultural sensitivity training on artifacts and deposits that may be encountered
 Pre-Construction Surveys for Biological + Nesting Birds/Bats (BIO-2, 3, AND 4)  On-Call Archaeologist (CUL-1)
845
1001-0007 - City of Soledad – Recycled Water Conveyance Project (PP25-8349) Task 8: Main St Sewer Construction Observation (20 working days) We have budgeted for approximately 20 working days for the installation of the Main St sewer scope. We will provide the same services as described in Task 2 to 4, but will track our time separately due to separate funding sources for this scope of work.

Attachments
Budget Estimate Table
Hourly Rate Sheet
846
Wallace Group Team Resource Estimate for the
1001-0007 City of Soledad - Recycled Water Conveyance CM Services (Value Engineering Revision 1) PRINCIPAL (Kari Wagner, PE) DIRECTOR OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (Zach Teske, PE) ASSISTANT RESIDENT ENGINEER II (Tony Scalise, Anthony Lehman) Senior Environmental Specialist III (Glenn Rider, QSP/QSD) PREVAILING WAGE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR (Tony Scalise) Earth Systems (Materials Testing) 360 PSM (Labor Compliance) DD&A (Environmental/Cultural) Misc. Direct Costs TOTAL LABOR HOURS TOTAL
TASK DESCRIPTION HRS HRS HRS HRS Cost Cost Cost Cost HRS LABOR COST RATE $260 $228 $180 $185 $185 $ $
1 Constructibility Review/Bid Phase Services 2 80 40 $134 122 $25,960 $26,094 2 Pre-Construction 4 55 90 $348 149 $29,780 $30,128
3 Construction (290 working days) 24 1457 62 2650 $23,561 4,193 $839,789 $863,350 4 Post-Construction 60 36 $80 96 $20,160 $20,240
5 Geotechnical/QA Materials Testing (Earth Systems) 122,617$ $122,617 6 Labor Compliance (360PSM) 68,200$ $68,200
7 Environmental/Cultural Services (DD&A) 25,537$ $25,537 8 Main St Sewer (20 working days) 31 150 5,000$ 840$ 181 $34,875 $40,715 SUB-TOTALS 30 1683 228 2800 $24,124 $4,560 $950,564 $1,140,660 WALLACE GROUP LABOR COSTS $7,800 $383,724 $41,040 $518,000 $950,564 WALLACE GROUP DIRECT COSTS $24,124
SUBCONSULTANT DIRECT COSTS $127,617 $68,200 $25,537 $221,354 DIRECT COSTS OVERHEAD @ 15% $36,822
TOTAL $1,232,864
Task Budgets may fluctuate within Overall Budget PHASE/TASK FINAL - PP25-8349 BUDGET - Soledad - Recycled Water Reduced Scope Page 1 5/7/2025 847
Construction/Program Management and Inspection Services:

Construction Office Tech I-III .......................................... $125/$135/$145 Construction Inspector I-IV ............................................ $150/$155/$160/$165 Senior Construction Inspector ........................................ $170 Construction Inspector (*Prevailing Wage) .......................... $185 Assistant Construction/ Program Manager I - II ..................... $165/$170 Construction/ Program Manager I-III ................................. $175/$180/$185 Senior Construction/ Program Manager I - II ........................ $195/$200 Assistant Resident Engineer I - II...................................... $175/$180 Resident Engineer I-III .................................................. $185/$190/$195 Senior Resident Engineer I-II .......................................... $205/$210 Director .................................................................. $228 Principal Construction Manager ....................................... $253 Principal .................................................................. $280 Public Works Administration Services:

Project Analyst I - IV ................................................... $125/$135/$145/$155 Senior Project Analyst I - III ........................................... $160/$165/$170 Senior Environmental Compliance Specialist I - III ................. $175/$180/$185 Support Services:

Office Assistant ......................................................... $120 Project Assistant I – III .................................................. $130/$135/$145 *Prevailing Wage:

State established prevailing wage rates will apply to some services based on state law, prevailing wage rates are subject to change over time and geographic location.

Right to Revisions:

Wallace Group reserves the right to revise our standard billing rates on an annual basis, personnel classifications may be added as necessary.

Additional Professional Services:

Fees for expert witness preparation, testimony, court appearances, or depositions will be billed at the rate of $400 an hour. If required to meet schedule requests, overtime on a project will be billed at 1.5 times the employee’s typical hourly rate.

Direct Expenses:

Direct expenses will be invoiced to the client and a handling charge of 15% may be added.

Sample direct expenses include, but are not limited to the following:
 travel expenses  sub-consultant services  agency fees  delivery/copy services  mileage (per IRS rates)  other direct expenses Invoicing and Interest Charges:

Invoices are submitted monthly on an accrued cost basis. A finance charge of 1.5% per month may be assessed on all balances that are thirty days past due.

WALLACE GROUP 2
2025 Standard Billing Rates
848

Soledad City CouncilMay 21, 2025

Soledad City Council
May 21, 2025