Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Soledad City Council
May 21, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
May 21, 2025
Body
Soledad City Council
Pages
24
Original file
95.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net. That file is the official record.

I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM
IV. CLOSED SESSION
V. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
VI. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

CITY OF SOLEDAD

JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY AND SUCCESSOR

HOUSING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, MAY 21, 2025
CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 248 MAIN STREET, SOLEDAD, CA 93960 6:00 PM
https://cityofsoledad.zoom.us/j/82322106851
Or Call
1-669-900-6833
Meeting ID: 823 2210 6851
Welcome to your City of Soledad City Council/Successor Agency Meeting. Your City Councilmembers/Agencymembers are:

Mayor Anna Velazquez
Mayor Pro Tem Fernando Cabrera
Councilmember Fernando Ansaldo-Sanchez
Councilmember Evarista Banuelos
Councilmember Ben Caldera
At this time, any member of the public may address the Council/Agency on Closed Session items appearing on the agenda. Speakers shall have limited time of three (3) minutes. Please be brief and to the point.

1. The City Council will recess to Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(B)(1) - City Manager Evaluation. 1 1
VII. ADDITIONS/MODIFICATIONS TO THE AGENDA
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT
IX. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
X. ANNOUNCEMENT - PRIDE FLAG RAISING EVENT
XI. PRESENATIONS
XII. CONSENT CALENDAR

1. Minutes

2. Warrants
Items of business may be added to the agenda upon a motion adopted by a minimum 2/3 vote finding that there is a need to take immediate action and that the need for action came to the attention of the City subsequent to the agenda being posted. Items may be deleted from the agenda upon request of staff or upon action of the Council.

At this time any member of the public may address the City Council on items not appearing on the agenda and items of interest to the public that are within the jurisdiction of the Council. A public comment card should be filled out completely to ensure the speaker is called upon to give comment. Public comments are generally limited to three (3) minutes; the mayor may further limit the time for public comments depending on the agenda schedule. Please be brief and to the point.

No action or discussion shall be taken on an item not appearing on the agenda.

1. A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Soledad Recognizing May 18 - 24, 2025, as National Public Works Week

2. A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Soledad Recognizing May 23, 2025, as National Poppy Day

3. A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Soledad Recognizing May 26, 2025, as Memorial Day
Cemetery Boardmember Desiree Barba will present a verbal update on the Soledad Cemetery District.

Attachments:

Staff Report
Minutes of 05/07/2025
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
Attachments:

Staff Report
04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
2 2

3. Resolution No. 6228, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with EMC Planning Group, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $120,000 to Provide Planning Services for the Renewable Oasis Truck Stop Project

4. Resolution No. 6229, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving City Event and Street Closure of Front Street Between Main Street and Soledad Street for the 2025 Music in the Park Concert Series

5. Resolution No. 6230, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving In-Kind City Services, Waiving Park Fee and Approving the Street Closure of Front Street Between West Street and East Street for the 4th Annual Soledad Hot Summer Days Event XIII. BUSINESS

1. Receive Soledad Police Department AB 481 Annual Report and Provide Direction

2. Ordinance No. 772, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Soledad Amending Section

3.24.080 Bidding Procedures for Public Works Construction Projects of Chapter 3.24- Purchase System of the Soledad Municipal Code
Attachments:

Staff Report
Resolution No. 6228
Exhibit A
Renewable Oasis Truck Stop - EMC proposal
Soledad Renewable Truck Depot
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
Attachments:

Staff Report
Resolution No. 6229
Music in the Park Street Closure Map
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
Attachments:

Staff Report
Resolution No. 6230
Attachment A
Financial Report - 2024 Hot Summer Days
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
Attachments:

Staff Report
AB 481 Annual Report
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
3 3

3. In-Lieu Housing Plan for a Portion of the Affordable Units in the Miravale Parcel E – Santa Clara Subdivision

4. 1. Resolution No. 6231 “Adopting The Proposed Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration And Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for The Proposed Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project (Project) and Direct Staff to File A CEQA Notice Of Determination”; and

2. Resolution No. 6232 “Approving a Construction Services Contract with Specialty Construction, Inc. (In The Not-To-Exceed Amount of $13,780,764.80 for the Construction ff the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute said Contract on Behalf of the City of Soledad, and Concurrently Approving a Construction Services Contract Change Order with Specialty Construction, Inc. in the Deductive Amount of a - $1,504,419.05 for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project for a Net Contract Approval Amount of $12,276,345.75, Plus a $650,000 Construction Contingency for a Total Not To Exceed Amount of $12,926,345.75 ”; and

3. Resolution No. 6233 “Approving A Consulting Services Agreement with the Wallace Group in the Not-To-Exceed Amount of $1,232,864” for Construction Management & Inspection Services for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, and Authorizing The City Manager to Execute the Agreement on Behalf of the City of Soledad”.

XIV. MAYOR'S REPORTS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
XV. COUNCILMEMBERS' REPORTS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
XVI. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Attachments:

Staff Report
Ordinance No. 772
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
Attachments:

Staff Report
Attachment 1 - Parcel E In-Lieu Land Proposal
Attachment 2 - Presentation
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
Attachments:

Staff Report
Resolution No. 6231 - CEQA
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 6231
Resolution No. 6232 - Construction
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 6232
Exhibit B to Resolution No. 6232
Resolution No. 6233 - CM
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 6233
COUNCIL ACTION: ________________________________
4 4
XVII. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
XVIII.ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Deputy City Clerk Darlene Noriega at (831) 223-5014. Notification of at least 48hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (RCRF 35.102-35.104).

Any writing or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall located at 248 Main Street, Soledad, California during normal business hours.

En caso que usted necesite ayuda en leer o en entender este aviso de Junta Publica, usted puede ponerse en contacto con la oficina del Edificio Municipal en 248 Calle Main o llamar al número (831) 223-5014, y el aviso será traducido para usted.

Cualquier escrito o documento proporcionado a la mayoría del Concejo Municipal con respecto a cualquier asunto en esta agenda se pondrá a disposición para inspección pública en el Ayuntamiento ubicado en 248 Main Street, Soledad, California durante el horario laboral.

Advanced submittal of public comments via email are due by 2:00 P.M. on the day of the scheduled meeting to the Deputy City Clerk at [email protected] Comments are limited to 250 words or less and effort will be made to read your comment into the record, but some comments may not be read due to time limitations. The City Clerk will read email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record.

La entrega anticipada de comentarios públicos por correo electrónico debe presentarse antes de las 2:00 p.m. del día de la reunión programada a la Secretaria Municipal al email [email protected]. Los comentarios están limitados a 250 palabras o menos y se hará un esfuerzo para leer su comentario en el registro, pero es posible que algunos comentarios no se lean debido a limitaciones de tiempo. La Secretaria Municipal leerá los comentarios del correo electrónico, siempre que la lectura no exceda los tres (3) minutos. Los comentarios enviados por correo electrónico pasarán a formar parte del registro.
.
5 5
05/16/2025

CERTIFICATION
I, Megan Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Soledad, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Joint City Council/Successor Agency Regular Meeting Agenda was posted at City Hall by Friday, May 16, 2025, at 5:00 p.m.

Megan Hunter, City Clerk/Manager
6 SUBJECT: Minutes
TO: Honorable Mayor Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Darlene Noriega, Deputy City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager

MEETING
DATE: May 21, 2025
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.
7 Minutes
City of Soledad
Joint City Council/Successor Agency/Housing Authority/Successor Housing Agency/ Regular Meeting
May 07, 2025

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Pro Tem Cabrera called the Joint City Council/ Successor Agency/ Housing Authority/ Successor Housing Agency/ Regular Meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.

ROLL CALL
The Following Councilmembers/Agency members were present when the meeting was called to order:

Mayor/Chair Anna M. Velazquez – Arrived at 6:04 p.m.

Mayor Pro Tem/Agency Member Fernando Cabrera
Councilmember/Agency Member Fernando Ansaldo-Sánchez
Councilmember/Agency Member Evarista Bañuelos
Councilmember/Agency Member Ben Caldera

THE FOLLOWING COUNCILMEMBER WAS ABSENT
None

CLOSED SESSION

1. The City Council will recess to closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the City is a party: Claim of Quinonez

2. The City Council will recess to closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the City is a party: Claim of Sanchez

3. The City Council will recess to closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the City is a party: Claim of Mendoza

4. The City Council will recess to closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)(d)(2) to confer with its Attorney regarding potential exposure to litigation: Subrogation Demand 1428 Monterey Street.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Mike Rodriquez reported with respect to item no. 1, the claim was unanimously denied.

Direction was provided to the City Attorney. No other reportable action was taken.

City Attorney Mike Rodriquez reported with respect to item no. 2, the claim has been tendered to the unlinking consultant, and the City has rejected the claim. Direction has been provided to the City Attorney. 8 City of Soledad City Council/Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes of May 07, 2025

Page 2 of 7 ends

City Attorney Mike Rodriquez reported with respect to item no. 3, the claim was rejected and denied.

Direction has been provided to the City Attorney. No other reportable action taken.

City Attorney Mike Rodriquez reported with respect to item no. 4, direction was provided to staff and legal counsel. No other reportable action was taken.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Lieutenant Juan Santiago led the Pledge of Allegiance.

ADDITIONS/MODIFICATIONS TO THE AGENDA
None

PUBLIC COMMENT
None

YOUTH COUNCIL REPORT
Youth Commissioners Angelina Flores and Giovani Bravo presented the youth council report.

COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

1. A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Soledad was presented, recognizing May 4th - May 10th, 2025, as Public Service Recognition Week

2. A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Soledad was presented, recognizing the Month of May as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month

3. A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Soledad was presented, recognizing the Month of May as National Mental Health Awareness Month
Community & Economic Development Director Beatriz Trujillo introduced the Monterey County Behavioral Health Bureau Chief Melanie Rhodes and Unit Supervisor Access to Treatment & ASOC Judith Herrera.

Monterey County Behavioral Health Bureau Chief Melanie Rhodes and Unit Supervisor Access to Treatment & ASOC Judith Herrera were present, accepted the proclamation, and thanked the council.

4. A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Soledad Recognizing May 4th - May 10th, 2025, as National Small Business Week
Economic Development Coordinator Tencia Vargas introduced Soledad Hair Co. Business owner Ervin P.

Ortiz.
9 City of Soledad City Council/Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes of May 07, 2025

Page 3 of 7 ends

Soledad Hair Co. Business owner Ervin P. Ortiz was present to accept the proclamation and thanked the council.

5. A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Soledad Recognizing May 11th - May 17th, 2025, as National Police Week
City of Soledad Police Department Lieutenant Santiago was present at the meeting, accepted the proclamation, and thanked the council.

All proclamations will be placed on display on the City of Soledad website.

CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no public comments.

Councilmember Ansaldo-Sanchez requested to have a separate discussion for item No. C-9.

Mayor Velazquez requested separate discussions for items C-8, C-9, and C-10.

Motion: Councilmember Banuelos motioned to approve items C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5, C-6, C-7, C-11, and C-12. Motion was seconded by Councilmember Ansaldo-Sanchez and carried by unanimous vote:

Action
Ayes: Banuelos, Ansaldo-Sanchez, Caldera, Cabrera, Velazquez Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
C-1. Minutes of 04/16/2025
C-2. Warrants of 04/10/2025 – 04/24/2025
C-3. Human Resources Department Activity Report
C-4. Community/Economic Development Department Activity Report C-5. Public Works Activity Report
C-6. Police Department Activity Report
C-7. Fire Department Activity Report
C-11. Resolution No. 6227, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving a Park Use Fee Waiver for the Celebration Nation Foundation for the Use of the Cesar Chavez Park for their Mother’s Day event.

C-12. Accept by Minute Motion the Annual 2024 Water System Consumer Confidence/Water Quality Report
10 City of Soledad City Council/Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes of May 07, 2025

Page 4 of 7 ends

Motion: Councilmember Banuelos motioned to approve items C-8, C-9, and C-10. Motion was seconded by Councilmember Caldera and carried by unanimous vote:

Action
Ayes: Banuelos, Caldera, Ansaldo-Sanchez, Cabrera, Velazquez Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
C-8. Parks and Recreation Activity Report
Mayor Velazquez hoped the Parks and Recreation Director, Jessica Potts, could give a brief comment regarding the Youth Career Life Skills Day. She thanked the Parks and Recreation Team and Monterey County Workforce Development. She asked that a summary of the event to be posted online so the public could see its success.

City Manager Hunter also thanked Parks and Recreation Director Jessica Potts and the team for their work on this event.

C-9. Consideration and Approval by Minute Motion of the 2025 Fireworks Booth Sales Permit Applications Councilmember Ansaldo-Sanchez asked why the permit fee is still $10 and why that has not changed.

Senior Planner Ariana Mora said this is what the fee has been, and in order for the fee to change, the fees as a whole need to be changed. This is something that should be considered for the next fiscal year.

Mayor Velazquez wanted to allow any applicants to comment on the application. She said, moving forward, she would like to see a standardized report.

There were no comments by the applicants.

C-10. Resolution No. 6226, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving the Construction Services Agreement with HR Sheet Metal Heating and Air Conditioning, in an Amount of $62,200 plus 5% Contingency for a Total Amount Not to Exceed $65,310 for the Purchase and Installation of Package Unit HVAC and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute said Contract on Behalf of the City of Soledad.

Public Works Director Don Wilcox presented the staff report and gave further details regarding the report.

BUSINESS
B-1. Resolution No. 6225, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving a Contract Change Order for Construction Services with Monterey Peninsula Engineering tor the Amount of $70,344 for a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $447,294 for the Soledad Fire Department Aerial Apparatus Bay (Phase 1) Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute said Contract Change Order on Behalf of the City of Soledad Economic Development Coordinator Tencia Vargas presented the staff report.

Assistant Engineer Alex Ramos presented the staff report. 11 City of Soledad City Council/Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes of May 07, 2025

Page 5 of 7 ends

There were no public comments.

Mayor Velazquez said she would like to minimize the need for contract change orders.

Motion: Mayor Pro Tem Cabrera motioned to approve item Resolution No. 6225. Motion was seconded by Councilmember Ansaldo-Sanchez and carried by unanimous vote:

Action
Ayes: Cabrera, Ansaldo-Sanchez, Banuelos, Caldera, Velazquez Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
MAYOR’S REPORTS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

1. On 04/17, she met with City Manager Hunter for their weekly meeting.

2. On 04/19, she was not able to attend the Easter egg hunt. However, she thanked the Parks and Recreation Department and the Soledad Lioness Club.

3. On 04/22, she completed her ethics training with the Senate, which satisfies the requirements that the elected officials are mandated to take.

4. On 04/23, she did not attend the League of California Cities Latino Caucus Legislative Action Symposium. However, she did help coordinate the event.

5. On 04/24, she met with City Manager Hunter as part of her weekly meeting.

6. On 04/24, she attended the Cal State Monterey Bay Women Leaders in the Community event.

7. On 04/26, she attended the Lideres Compesinas, Día del Niño event at the Soledad Community Center.

8. On 04/27, she attended Día del Empresario in Salinas, held by El Pajaro CDC.

9. On 04/28, she had a listening session with Lideres Compesinas.

10. On 04/28, she attended the Monterey County LAFCO meeting.

11. On 04/28, she attended the Salinas Valley Mayors and City Managers’ meeting in Salinas.

12. On 04/25, she attended the Monterey County Mayors Association meeting in the City of Soledad.

13. On 05/05, she attended the TAMC Rail Committee meeting.

14. On 05/05, she met with a Central California Alliance for Health representative.

15. On 05/06, she met with Lieutenant Santiago and representatives from the Monterey County Health Department regarding a Narcan vending machine for Soledad.

16. On 05/07, she attended the Employee Recognition lunch.

COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Cabrera had no items to report.

Councilmember Ansaldo-Sanchez had four items to report:

1. On 04/19, he attended the Easter Egg Hunt.

2. He attended the Swim Team pop-up.

3. On 04/23 – 25, he attended the League of California Cities Leadership Summit and the Latino Caucus.

4. On 04/30, he attended the Salinas Valley Pride Celebration meeting.

Councilmember Caldera had one item to report:

1. On 04/18, he attended the unveiling of the Bracero Mural in Chualar. 12 City of Soledad City Council/Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes of May 07, 2025

Page 6 of 7 ends

Councilmember Banuelos had seven items to report:

1. On 04/17, she attended the Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority Board of Directors meeting.

2. On 04/18, she attended the unveiling of the Bracero mural in Chualar.

3. On 04/19, she MC’d the Easter Egg Hunt event.

4. On 04/21, she attended the 4th of July Committee meeting.

5. On 04/24, she attended the Soledad Health Care District meeting at Edan Valley.

6. On 04/26, she attended the Día del Niño event at the Soledad Community Center.

7. On 04/30, she attended the Children's Day event at La Reina.

CITY MANAGERS’ REPORT
City Manager Hunter had eight items to report:

1. She will attend the Regional Government Services planning meeting on Thursday, 05/08, and Friday, 05/09. She serves on that Executive Board.

2. On May 13, TAMC will have the Vision Zero workshop at the Soledad Community Center.

3. There will be an upcoming Town Hall meeting on May 29th.

4. The Council Chamber at City Hall should be ready by the council’s next meeting date.

5. The financial Analyst, Jesus Yanez, and she are working on the Strategic planning items. That information will be circulated back to the council.

6. The City will proceed with the Hot Summer Days event. That item will be returned to the council.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Banuelos had no request.

Mayor Pro Tem Cabrera had no request.

Councilmember Ansaldo Sanchez had one request:

1. He would like to move forward with an Ordinance or Resolution stating that the City does stand behind the Transgender community.

Councilmember Caldera had no request.

Mayor Velazquez had three requests:

1. She would like to have information regarding the cell tower going up at Blas Santana Park. Community members are concerned.

City Manager Hunter said the City is limited in its decisions regarding cell towers and their locations. Four trees will be placed around the area.

2. She would like to invite the owner of the Soledad Marketplace to come to a meeting and provide an update on the project.

3. On May 10th, there will be a Mother's Day event at Cesar Chavez Park from 10:00 to 12:00. 13 City of Soledad City Council/Successor Agency Regular Meeting Minutes of May 07, 2025

Page 7 of 7 ends

ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.

Minutes Approved: May 21, 2025
_______________________________________
ANNA M. VELAZQUEZ, Mayor/Chair
________________________________________
MEGAN HUNTER, City Clerk
14 SUBJECT: Warrants
TO: Honorable Mayor Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Mike Howard, Finance Director

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager

MEETING
DATE: May 21, 2025
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.
15 5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 1 of 28
Check Report
Soledad, CA By Check Number
Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Bank Code: APRAB-Mechanics Bank
Payment Type: EFT
CITGON CITY OF GONZALES 04/30/2025 EFT 0.00 120,419.33 10149 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042525 Invoice 04/29/2025 City of Gonzales VLF Sharing Agreement 0.00 120,419.33 100-8000-52180 MOTOR VEHICLE TO GON… City of Gonzales VLF Sharing Agr… 120,419.33 CANNOA CANNON CORPORATION 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 2,787.51 10150 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 91465 Invoice 05/02/2025 Sys. Improvement / Garage Maint. 0.00 2,787.51 310-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Collection System Improvement 582.40 310-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… New Garage / Maint. Shop 2,205.11 FASTEN FASTENAL COMPANY 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 1,587.57 10151 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount CASOE58930 Invoice 05/02/2025 Chemicals Cabinet 0.00 1,587.57 309-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Chemicals Cabinet 1,587.57 FIRST FIRST ALARM 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 2,578.17 10152
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 882891 Invoice 05/02/2025 Alarm Systems 0.00 2,578.17
100-2100-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Alarm Systems 1,211.74 312-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Alarm Systems 257.82 410-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Alarm Systems 1,108.61 GYMREP GUILLIEMO GARCIA 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 650.00 10153 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 01511 Invoice 05/02/2025 Cable Machine Repair 0.00 650.00 100-2200-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Cable Machine Repair 650.00 HARASS HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 14,466.25 10154 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 67116 Invoice 05/02/2025 HSIP Cycle 11 0.00 14,356.25
412-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… HSIP Cycle 11 14,356.25 67117 Invoice 05/02/2025 HSIP Cycle 10 0.00 110.00
412-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… HSIP Cycle 10 110.00 PARTST HCOP, LLC/PARTS TREE.COM 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 349.41 10155 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 2-6751 Invoice 05/02/2025 Axle Shaft 0.00 349.41
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Axle Shaft 349.41 MISLAW MISSION LAWN AND GARDEN CARE 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 6,460.00 10156 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 8165 Invoice 05/02/2025 Liberty Ct. Maint. 0.00 400.00
651-0000-52516 LANDSCAPE MAINT. (EAS… Liberty Ct. Maint. 400.00 16 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 2 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 8168 Invoice 05/02/2025 Front, RSV 0.00 1,650.00
410-0000-52531 STREET MAINTENANCE Front St. 1,350.00
647-0000-52530 STREET LANDSCAPING RSV 300.00
8171 Invoice 05/02/2025 Orchard Lane Maint. 0.00 2,800.00 650-0000-52519 MAINTENANCE Orchard Lane Maint. 2,800.00 8173 Invoice 05/02/2025 Gabilan Dr. Maint. 0.00 680.00
410-0000-52531 STREET MAINTENANCE Gabilan Dr. Maint. 680.00 8175 Invoice 05/02/2025 Orchard Landscape 0.00 780.00
651-0000-52516 LANDSCAPE MAINT. (EAS… Orchard Landscape 780.00 8179 Invoice 05/02/2025 Fire Dept. Monthly Maint. 0.00 150.00 100-1400-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Fire Dept. Monthly Maint. 150.00 MOBAAN MONTEREY BAY ANALYTICAL SERVICES 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 8,265.50 10157 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 2503SOL-DW Invoice 05/02/2025 MBAS Water Samples 0.00 1,112.80 309-0000-52053 LAB ANALYSIS & TESTING MBAS Water Samples 1,112.80 2503SOL-WW Invoice 05/02/2025 WW Monitoring 1/25 0.00 7,152.70 310-0000-52053 LAB ANALYSIS & TESTING WW Monitoring 1/25 7,152.70 CULLIG QUALITY WATER ENTERPRISES, INC. 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 172.33 10158 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 1253824 Invoice 05/02/2025 Water Bottles 0.00 127.63
309-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Water Bottles 127.63 1254892 Invoice 05/02/2025 WWTP / Water System 0.00 44.70 309-0000-52053 LAB ANALYSIS & TESTING WWTP / Water System 22.35 310-0000-52053 LAB ANALYSIS & TESTING WWTP / Water System 22.35 ANDLOC RUTH MARIA MILLA-LEON 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 160.00 10159 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 46388 Invoice 05/02/2025 Code Re-Set - PD 0.00 160.00
100-1400-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Code Re-Set - PD 160.00 USABLU USABLUE BOOK 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 681.97 10160
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV00682747 Invoice 05/02/2025 Solids Microfilters - Lab 0.00 442.73 310-0000-52053 LAB ANALYSIS & TESTING Solids Microfilters - Lab 442.73 INV00687910 Invoice 05/02/2025 Carvoy Container for Lab Samples 0.00 239.24 310-0000-52053 LAB ANALYSIS & TESTING Carvoy Container for Lab Samples 239.24 VOSTIS VOSTI'S INC 05/05/2025 EFT 0.00 248.65 10161
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 275685-1 Invoice 05/02/2025 Door Hinge 0.00 89.91
100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Door Hinge 89.91
275741-1 Invoice 05/02/2025 Headlight Bulb 0.00 158.74
100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Headlight Bulb 158.74 AMEG AMEG ENTERPRISES, LLC 05/08/2025 EFT 0.00 110,500.00 10162 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 1044 Invoice 05/07/2025 Modular Units 0.00 110,500.00
121-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Modular Units 110,500.00 Total EFT: 0.00 269,326.69
17 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 3 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payment Type: Regular
SOLETI SOLEDAD TIRE SERVICE 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 -25.00 57200 AFLAC AFLAC HEADQUARTERS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,936.33 57215 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000467 Invoice 05/02/2025 AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 0.00 785.74 100-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 279.47
309-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 99.22
310-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 372.27
311-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 22.13
312-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 5.29
410-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 4.82
416-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 2.54
INV0000468 Invoice 05/02/2025 AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 0.00 1,150.59 100-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 622.17
309-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 70.44
310-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 420.98
311-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 20.52
312-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 3.49
410-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 6.82
416-0000-21140 AFLAC PAYABLE AFLAC CONTRIBUTION 6.17
CALIFS CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,061.07 57216 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000470 Invoice 05/02/2025 CHILD SUPPORT CONTRIBUTION 0.00 1,061.07 100-0000-21194 CHILD SUPPORT/GARNISH… CHILD SUPPORT CONTRIBUTION 991.91 312-0000-21194 CHILD SUPPORT/GARNISH… CHILD SUPPORT CONTRIBUTION 18.69 410-0000-21194 CHILD SUPPORT/GARNISH… CHILD SUPPORT CONTRIBUTION 50.47 COMM F COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 130.00 57217 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000469 Invoice 05/02/2025 CAPITAL CAMPAIGN DONATION 0.00 130.00 100-0000-21195 MISC. PAYROLL DEDUCTI… CAPITAL CAMPAIGN DONATION 84.56 309-0000-21195 MISC. PAYROLL DEDUCTI… CAPITAL CAMPAIGN DONATION 19.16 310-0000-21195 MISC. PAYROLL DEDUCTI… CAPITAL CAMPAIGN DONATION 19.16 311-0000-21195 MISC. PAYROLL DEDUCTI… CAPITAL CAMPAIGN DONATION 7.12 VANTAG MISSION SQUARE-303584 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 10,811.18 57218 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000466 Invoice 05/02/2025 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION 0.00 389.30 100-0000-21210 ICMA PAYABLE EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION 94.58
309-0000-21210 ICMA PAYABLE EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION 20.81
310-0000-21210 ICMA PAYABLE EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION 258.16
311-0000-21210 ICMA PAYABLE EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION 13.13
312-0000-21210 ICMA PAYABLE EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION 2.62
INV0000471 Invoice 05/02/2025 DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 0.00 545.82 100-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 10.45 309-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 421.29 310-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 114.08 INV0000472 Invoice 05/02/2025 Directors' 7% Ret. Contr. 0.00 472.07 100-0000-21171 PERS Directors' 7% Ret. Contr. 241.81
309-0000-21171 PERS Directors' 7% Ret. Contr. 92.10
310-0000-21171 PERS Directors' 7% Ret. Contr. 92.10
311-0000-21171 PERS Directors' 7% Ret. Contr. 46.06
INV0000473 Invoice 05/02/2025 DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 0.00 7,320.00 100-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 3,307.94 18 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 4 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 309-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 841.39 310-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 2,314.32 311-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 239.95 312-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 217.05 410-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 360.11 416-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 30.11 531-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 9.13 INV0000474 Invoice 05/02/2025 DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 0.00 2,083.99 100-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 1,759.90 309-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 136.46 310-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 136.46 311-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 7.33 410-0000-21145 DEFERRED COMP. PAYAB… DEFERRED-EMPLOYEE PORTION 43.84 PRINCI PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,664.56 57219 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000475 Invoice 05/02/2025 DENTAL INSURANCE 0.00 3,133.86 100-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 1,558.33 121-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 22.09 309-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 358.61 310-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 890.98 311-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 61.83 312-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 62.69 410-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 166.31 416-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 11.37 531-0000-21160 MEDICAL INSURANCE PA… DENTAL INSURANCE 1.65 INV0000496 Invoice 05/02/2025 VISION INSURANCE 0.00 530.70 402-0000-48011 CITY EMPLOYEE CONTRIB… VISION INSURANCE 530.70 SEIU L SEIU LOCAL 521 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,317.63 57220 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000490 Invoice 05/02/2025 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 0.00 23.00 100-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 10.15 309-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 0.65 310-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 10.35 312-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 0.52 410-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 1.33 INV0000491 Invoice 05/02/2025 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 0.00 1,294.63 100-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 446.97 309-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 153.90 310-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 615.09 311-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 13.25 312-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 10.84 410-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 47.55 531-0000-21185 SEIU LOCAL 521 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 7.03 SPOA SOLEDAD POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 780.00 57221 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000494 Invoice 05/02/2025 POLICE OFFICERS CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 780.00 100-0000-21190 SOLEDAD POLICE OFFICE… POLICE OFFICERS CONTRIBUTIO… 770.11 416-0000-21190 SOLEDAD POLICE OFFICE… POLICE OFFICERS CONTRIBUTIO… 9.89 STAEDD STATE OF CALIFORNIA E.D.D. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 11,869.83 57222 19 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 5 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000499 Invoice 05/02/2025 STATE TAX W/H 0.00 11,869.83 100-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 7,485.92 121-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 87.85
309-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 1,031.99 310-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 2,340.42 311-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 233.27
312-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 145.34
410-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 448.55
416-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 63.84
531-0000-21130 STATE TAX PAYABLE STATE TAX W/H 32.65
STPERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA PERS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 52,956.48 57223 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000476 Invoice 05/02/2025 CHIEF & LIEUTENANT 0.00 1,720.88 100-0000-21171 PERS CHIEF & LIEUTENANT 1,720.88
INV0000477 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Conf PEPRA 0.00 295.10 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Conf PEPRA 147.56
309-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Conf PEPRA 59.01
310-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Conf PEPRA 59.01
311-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Conf PEPRA 29.52
INV0000478 Invoice 05/02/2025 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 0.00 10,609.29 100-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 4,610.38
121-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 187.00
309-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 859.35
310-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 3,709.81
311-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 290.20
312-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 152.56
410-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 734.41
531-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 65.58
INV0000479 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Regular Empl 0.00 11,073.24 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 4,831.53 121-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 189.90 309-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 932.61 310-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 3,827.22 311-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 324.66 312-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 154.95 410-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 745.78 531-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 66.59
INV0000480 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Police 0.00 6,213.03 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 6,164.45
416-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 48.58
INV0000481 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Conf. Employee 0.00 330.78 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Conf. Employee 168.67 309-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Conf. Employee 81.07 310-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Conf. Employee 81.04 INV0000482 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Reg Managers 0.00 573.86 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Reg Managers 154.95 309-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Reg Managers 143.46 310-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Reg Managers 143.46 311-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Reg Managers 57.39
312-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Reg Managers 28.70
410-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Reg Managers 45.90
INV0000483 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Managers 0.00 832.09 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Managers 224.67
309-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Managers 208.03
20 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 6 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 310-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Managers 208.03
311-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Managers 83.21
312-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Managers 41.60
410-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Managers 66.55
INV0000484 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Police 0.00 667.85 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 667.85
INV0000485 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Police 0.00 2,352.42 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 2,231.74
416-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 120.68
INV0000486 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Police 0.00 1,396.68 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 1,324.94
416-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 71.74
INV0000487 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Police 0.00 6,208.49 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 6,159.95
416-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Police 48.54
INV0000488 Invoice 05/02/2025 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 0.00 4,164.55 100-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 1,501.27
309-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 901.24
310-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 1,074.62
311-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 83.92
312-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 196.00
410-0000-21171 PERS EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION 407.50
INV0000489 Invoice 05/02/2025 City of Soledad Regular Empl 0.00 6,518.22 100-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 2,421.32 309-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 1,424.35 310-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 1,675.80 311-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 121.66 312-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 284.15 410-0000-21171 PERS City of Soledad Regular Empl 590.94 **Void** 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 0.00 57224
SUNLIF SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 2,212.27 57225 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000492 Invoice 05/02/2025 LIFE, AD&D, LTD 0.00 1,835.92 100-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 983.52 121-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 18.44
309-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 182.59 310-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 446.54 311-0000-21150 INSUARNCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 39.63
312-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 34.85
410-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 118.88 416-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 5.56
531-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE LIFE, AD&D, LTD 5.91
INV0000493 Invoice 05/02/2025 SUPPLEMENTAL 0.00 376.35
100-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 188.08
121-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 3.24
309-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 76.21
310-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 68.76
311-0000-21150 INSUARNCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 10.78
312-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 5.87
410-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 22.93
416-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 0.31
531-0000-21150 INSURANCE PAYABLE SUPPLEMENTAL 0.17
UNIWAY UNITED WAY MONTEREY COUNTY 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 2.00 57226 21 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 7 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000495 Invoice 05/02/2025 UNITED WAY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 2.00 100-0000-21195 MISC. PAYROLL DEDUCTI… UNITED WAY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.91 311-0000-21195 MISC. PAYROLL DEDUCTI… UNITED WAY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.10 312-0000-21195 MISC. PAYROLL DEDUCTI… UNITED WAY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.19 410-0000-21195 MISC. PAYROLL DEDUCTI… UNITED WAY CONTRIBUTIONS 0.80 ACCBUS ACC BUSINESS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,026.20 57227 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 6870531019 Invoice 05/02/2025 Gateway Center Internet 0.00 1,026.20 100-1200-52400 UTILITIES Gateway Center Internet 1,026.20 ACCBUS ACC BUSINESS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 2,284.07 57228 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 4224070013 Invoice 05/02/2025 Internet - City Hall 0.00 2,284.07 100-8000-52400 UTILITIES Internet - City Hall 2,284.07
ACCBUS ACC BUSINESS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,459.25 57229 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 2632581010 Invoice 05/02/2025 WWTP Internet Service 0.00 1,459.25 310-0000-52410 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER WWTP Internet Service 1,459.25 ACCBUS ACC BUSINESS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,638.38 57230 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 2625781015 Invoice 05/02/2025 Internet Svc 0.00 1,638.38 100-2200-52400 UTILITIES Internet Svc 1,638.38
AGILEO AGILE OCCUPATION MEDICINE PC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,565.00 57231 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount EM042992 Invoice 05/02/2025 Pre-Employment Physical 0.00 1,565.00 100-1400-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Pre-Employment Physical PD 1,400.00 100-2200-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Pre-Employment Physical Recrea… 165.00 ALCANA ALCANTAR ACE HARDWARE 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,098.23 57232 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 5156 Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Credit - FD 0.00 -2.39
100-1450-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Credit - FD -2.39
5622 Invoice 05/02/2025 Weed Killer - FD 0.00 25.58
100-1450-52041 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES Weed Killer - FD 25.58 5700 Invoice 05/02/2025 Rope - FD 0.00 30.37
100-1450-52041 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES Rope - FD 30.37
5968 Invoice 05/02/2025 Irrigation Repairs 0.00 38.35
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Irrigation Repairs 38.35 5998 Invoice 05/02/2025 Lock Pin 0.00 6.00
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Lock Pin 6.00
6022 Invoice 05/02/2025 Irrigation Repairs 0.00 9.36
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Irrigation Repairs 9.36 6115 Invoice 05/02/2025 Win Connectors 0.00 65.86
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Win Connectors 65.86 6118 Invoice 05/02/2025 Paint Remover 0.00 21.84
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Paint Remover 21.84 22 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 8 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 6124 Invoice 05/02/2025 Braker Cleaner 0.00 19.64
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Braker Cleaner 19.64 6131 Invoice 05/02/2025 Toilet Valve 0.00 14.19
100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Toilet Valve 14.19
6147 Invoice 05/02/2025 Toilet Repairs 0.00 23.35
100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Toilet Repairs 23.35
6149 Invoice 05/02/2025 E. Sewer Monitor Cutter 0.00 31.67 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… E. Sewer Monitor Cutter 31.67 6152 Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Bolt Cutter Return 0.00 -31.67 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Bolt Cutter Return -31.67 6153 Invoice 05/02/2025 Bolt Cutter & Torch Kit 0.00 114.69 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Bolt Cutter & Torch Kit 114.69 6172 Invoice 05/02/2025 Trimmer Line / Utility Knife 0.00 18.33 100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Trimmer Line / Utility Knife 18.33 6180 Invoice 05/02/2025 Sealant & Roof Coat Emul. 0.00 26.85 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Sealant & Roof Coat Emul. 26.85 6189 Invoice 05/02/2025 Car Wash Materials 0.00 19.85
309-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Car Wash Materials 19.85 6204 Invoice 05/02/2025 Key Rings - Collections Dept. 0.00 19.16 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Key Rings - Collections Dept. 19.16 6208 Invoice 05/02/2025 Cable Ties & Nozzles 0.00 106.01 100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Cable Ties & Nozzles 106.01 6210 Invoice 05/02/2025 Bolts & Nuts 0.00 7.14
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Bolts & Nuts 7.14 6214 Invoice 05/02/2025 Screws & Fastners 0.00 14.36
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Screws & Fastners 14.36 6272 Invoice 05/02/2025 9V Battery 0.00 13.10
100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE 9V Battery 13.10
6296 Invoice 05/02/2025 Crate / Tote Bag for Tools 0.00 168.23 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Crate / Tote Bag for Tools 168.23 6297 Invoice 05/02/2025 Deck Screws 0.00 17.47
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Deck Screws 17.47 6298 Invoice 05/02/2025 Double End Bolt 0.00 17.47
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Double End Bolt 17.47
6314 Invoice 05/02/2025 Restroom Supplies 0.00 79.90
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Restroom Supplies 79.90 6317 Invoice 05/02/2025 D Batteries 0.00 14.19
100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE D Batteries 14.19
6321 Invoice 05/02/2025 Hotspot Sprint Link Sewer Monitor 0.00 2.61 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Hotspot Sprint Link Sewer Moni… 2.61 6344 Invoice 05/02/2025 Edger Blade 0.00 19.65
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Edger Blade 19.65 6366 Invoice 05/02/2025 Youth Theater Program 0.00 62.61 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Theater Program 62.61 6371 Invoice 05/02/2025 Facility - Door Weather Strip 0.00 14.19 100-2200-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Facility - Door Weather Strip 14.19 6373 Invoice 05/02/2025 Dust Masks 0.00 20.75
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Dust Masks 20.75
6374 Invoice 05/02/2025 WD-40 0.00 13.10
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… WD-40 13.10
6375 Invoice 05/02/2025 Galvanized Trash Can 0.00 42.60 100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Galvanized Trash Can 42.60 23 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 9 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 6387 Invoice 05/02/2025 Landscape Irrigation Repair 0.00 25.09 100-2200-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Landscape Irrigation Repair 25.09 6391 Invoice 05/02/2025 Cleaning Cloths 0.00 8.73
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Cleaning Cloths 8.73 **Void** 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 0.00 57233
ALLSTA ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 5,836.07 57234 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 180130 Invoice 05/02/2025 RIC Pack - FD 0.00 5,836.07
100-1450-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… RIC Pack - FD 5,836.07 ALLINS ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC-NPB MAIN 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 459.00 57235 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 3065181 Invoice 05/02/2025 Liability Coverage - PD 0.00 459.00 100-1400-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Liability Coverage - PD 459.00 AMAZON AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 2,527.66 57236 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 163G-1R31-3DYC Invoice 05/02/2025 Keyboard 0.00 30.58
100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Keyboard 30.58
19C4-T4T7-JKJG Invoice 05/02/2025 Back Up Android Phone 0.00 440.22 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Back Up Android Phone 440.22 19CG-39NQ-F3PL Invoice 05/02/2025 Spare Heater 0.00 43.69 100-1200-52041 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES Spare Heater 43.69
19R3-XGNJ-GXXP Invoice 05/02/2025 Monitors 0.00 72.62
100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Monitors 72.62
1C41-Y9FF-F3V1 Invoice 05/02/2025 Paint for Field 0.00 245.64 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Paint for Field 245.64
1C41-Y9FF-H3TX Invoice 05/02/2025 Chambers Workstation 0.00 65.52 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Chambers Workstation 65.52 1FJJ-K1T1-F19L Invoice 05/02/2025 Mic Clips - FD 0.00 98.22 100-1450-52041 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES Mic Clips - FD 98.22 1G7M-74TP-V46Y Invoice 05/02/2025 Spare Switch 0.00 131.10 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Spare Switch 131.10 1J7M-Y6H7-PFH1 Invoice 05/02/2025 EMS - FD 0.00 56.36
431-0000-52041 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES EMS - FD 56.36
1KJY-YDG6-3PQD Invoice 05/02/2025 MDT Charger - PD 0.00 41.50 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… MDT Charger - PD 41.50 1KXY-DVLR-HD37 Invoice 05/02/2025 Docking Station Hub 0.00 109.24 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Docking Station Hub 109.24 1MP6-CV3N-KK3C Invoice 05/02/2025 Game Ball 0.00 87.39
100-2200-52047 SPORTS EQUIPMENT Game Ball 87.39
1V7Y-93RG-KFVF Invoice 05/02/2025 Engine Supplies - FD 0.00 52.43 100-1450-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Engine Supplies - FD 52.43 1V96-Y1CR-D63N Invoice 05/02/2025 Camera Mount 0.00 65.74 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Camera Mount 65.74 1VXM-WKT1-XDYP Invoice 05/02/2025 Cable Management 0.00 32.76 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Cable Management 32.76 1VYK-C4FV-7TKJ Invoice 05/02/2025 Cable Management 0.00 42.38 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Cable Management 42.38 1WND-XVF9-RR… Invoice 05/02/2025 Monitor, UPS Battery, Cables, Bracket 0.00 765.87 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Monitor, UPS Battery, Cables, Br… 765.87 24 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 10 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 1Y1R-J3RL-RK19 Invoice 05/02/2025 Switch for new Servers 0.00 146.40 100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Switch for new Servers 146.40 ANALGE ANALGESIC SERVICES, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 253.25 57237 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 88936 Invoice 05/02/2025 Oxygen - FD 0.00 83.50
431-0000-52041 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES Oxygen - FD 83.50
89759 Invoice 05/02/2025 Oxygen - FD 0.00 169.75
431-0000-52041 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES Oxygen - FD 169.75
ANIMAL ANIMAL DAMAGE MANAGEMENT, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 200.00 57238 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 392233 Invoice 05/02/2025 Rodent Control 0.00 200.00
100-2100-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Rodent Control 200.00 AONRIS AON RISK INSURANCE SERVICES WEST INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 57239 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 8200000378530 Invoice 05/02/2025 Equipment Floater 0.00 3,000.00 100-8000-52320 VEHICLE INSURANCE Equipment Floater 3,000.00 AUTOZO AUTOZONE LLC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,577.07 57240 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 05509880843 Invoice 05/02/2025 Low Beam Head Lights 0.00 105.48 100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Low Beam Head Lights 105.48 05509880871 Invoice 05/02/2025 Clutch Kit 0.00 456.98
100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Clutch Kit 456.98
05509881253 Invoice 05/02/2025 Air Valve Cylinder 0.00 224.63 100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Air Valve Cylinder 224.63 05509881254 Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Credit 0.00 -157.50
100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Credit -157.50
05509881259 Invoice 05/02/2025 High Beam Bulbs 0.00 84.38 100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE High Beam Bulbs 84.38 05509881292 Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Door Handle Credit 0.00 -76.11 100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Door Handle Credit -76.11 05509881299 Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Credit 0.00 -84.38
100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Credit -84.38
05509881300 Invoice 05/02/2025 Low Beam Head Lights 0.00 150.65 100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Low Beam Head Lights 150.65 05509882273 Invoice 05/02/2025 Headlight Bulb 0.00 84.38 100-8000-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Headlight Bulb 84.38
05509884509 Invoice 05/02/2025 Brake Calipers 0.00 138.35 100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Brake Calipers 138.35
05509884653 Invoice 05/02/2025 Clutch Fluid, Ignition Wire, Autolite Dub. P… 0.00 95.58 100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Clutch Fluid, Ignition Wire, Autol… 95.58 05509885160 Invoice 05/02/2025 Water Pump Thermo Housing 0.00 163.96 100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Water Pump Thermo Housing 163.96 05509885924 Invoice 05/02/2025 Radiator Hose 0.00 71.69 100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Radiator Hose 71.69
05509886018 Invoice 05/02/2025 Sealant 0.00 12.00
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Sealant 12.00
05510388793 Invoice 05/02/2025 Fuel Filter Neck 0.00 117.77 25 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 11 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Fuel Filter Neck 117.77
06290028795 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tool for Shop 0.00 13.10 310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Tool for Shop 13.10 06290030604 Invoice 05/02/2025 Shop Tools 0.00 148.58
310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Shop Tools 148.58
06290989978 Invoice 05/02/2025 Car Wash Supply - FD 0.00 27.53 100-1450-52041 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES Car Wash Supply - FD 27.53 BACKFL BACKFLOW DISTRIBUTORS INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 667.21 57241 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 78492 Invoice 05/02/2025 Backflow Wtr. Reconfig Front St. Proj. 0.00 667.21 412-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Backflow Wtr. Reconfig Front St.… 667.21 BADGER BADGER METER, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,374.72 57242 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 80193598 Invoice 05/02/2025 Badger Meter Cell Signal 0.00 1,374.72 309-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Badger Meter Cell Signal 1,374.72 BLUEALLY BLUEALLY TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 50,676.50 57243 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV25365 Invoice 05/02/2025 Dell Optiplex with ProSupport 0.00 2,159.75 100-1200-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… Dell Optiplex with ProSupport 2,159.75 INV25582 Invoice 05/02/2025 City Hall Servers 0.00 42,633.41 100-1320-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… City Hall Servers 42,633.41 INV26556 Invoice 05/02/2025 2 Monitors & Workstation 0.00 5,883.34 100-1200-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… Econ Dev. 2 Monitors 983.25 100-1320-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… IT Chambers Workstation 4,900.09 CAL CAL FIRE 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 2,237.60 57244
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 0000001632968 Invoice 05/02/2025 Painting of Fire Station 0.00 2,237.60 211-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Painting of Fire Station 2,237.60 CACERINT CALIFORNIA CERTIFIED INTERPRETERS INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 500.00 57245 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 026 Invoice 05/02/2025 State of the City Interpretation 0.00 500.00 100-1000-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… State of the City Interpretation 500.00 CALWES CAL-WEST 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 500.00 57246
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 250362 Invoice 05/02/2025 Preventive Maint. Mar 2025 0.00 500.00 410-0000-57032 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE Preventive Maint. Mar 2025 500.00 CENCOASTGEN CENTRAL COAST GENERAL BUILDERS INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,600.00 57247 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 11111 Invoice 05/02/2025 TV Mounts / City Seal (Chambers) 0.00 1,600.00 100-3000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… TV Mounts / City Seal (Chambers) 1,600.00 CINTAS CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 3 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 867.74 57248 26 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 12 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 4227235871 Invoice 05/02/2025 Parks St. Uniforms 0.00 92.75 100-1400-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 7.03 100-1500-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 2.29 100-2100-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 45.02 311-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 0.77 312-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 8.50 410-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 29.14 4227967730 Invoice 05/02/2025 Uniforms WW/Water 0.00 278.72 309-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Uniforms WW/Water 40.02 310-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Uniforms WW/Water 238.70 4227967835 Invoice 05/02/2025 Parks St. Uniforms 0.00 102.00 100-1400-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 7.74 100-1500-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 2.50 100-2100-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 49.51 311-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 0.85 312-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 9.35 410-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks St. Uniforms 32.05 4228692391 Invoice 05/02/2025 Parks/Streets Uniform 0.00 92.75 100-1400-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks/Streets Uniform 7.03 100-1500-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks/Streets Uniform 2.29 100-2100-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks/Streets Uniform 45.02 311-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks/Streets Uniform 0.77 312-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks/Streets Uniform 8.50 410-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Parks/Streets Uniform 29.14 4228692462 Invoice 05/02/2025 Uniforms WW/Water 0.00 301.52 309-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Uniforms WW/Water 60.19 310-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Uniforms WW/Water 241.33 CITYOF CITY OF SOLEDAD-PETTY CASH 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 244.10 57249 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042925 Invoice 05/02/2025 Petty Cash 0.00 244.10
100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Senior Program: Travel 7.24 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Pre-K: Little Einsteins 27.38 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Pre-K: Little Einsteins 8.76 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES SoCoSocial Raffle Prizes 15.12 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Pre-K: Tiny Chefs 15.57 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth: Easy Baking 4.91 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Senior: Art Day 14.49
100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth: Easy Baking 10.13 100-2200-52105 SPECIAL EVENTS Volunteer Appreciation BBQ 16.43 100-2200-52105 SPECIAL EVENTS Volunteer Appreciation BBQ 16.54 100-2200-52105 SPECIAL EVENTS Special Event: Cookies w/Santa 5.58 100-2200-52115 SUNDRY Sundry: Water for Sale 19.99
100-2200-52115 SUNDRY Sundry: Water for Sale 39.98
100-2200-52115 SUNDRY Sundry: Water for Sale 41.98
CPM COMMERCIAL PUMP & MECHANICAL, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 39,943.01 57250 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 24103-2 Invoice 05/02/2025 Diesel Tank Well Destruction 0.00 9,140.00 310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Diesel Tank Well Destruction 9,140.00 24105-2 Invoice 05/02/2025 Adobe Well Destruction 0.00 10,385.94 100-2100-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Adobe Well Destruction 10,385.94 24113-2 Invoice 05/02/2025 La Cuesta - Booster 0.00 19,764.57 309-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… La Cuesta - Booster 19,764.57 27 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 13 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 24114-2 Invoice 05/02/2025 Inspection Station 6+9 0.00 652.50 309-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Inspection Station 6+9 652.50 CORE&M CORE & MAIN LP 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,262.93 57251 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount W780783 Invoice 05/02/2025 Provisional Encampment 0.00 3,239.27 121-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Provisional Encampment 3,239.27 W813752 Invoice 05/02/2025 Coll. Adhesive Pad 0.00 23.66 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Coll. Adhesive Pad 23.66 CSG CO CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 28,086.25 57252 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 60738 Invoice 05/02/2025 Fire Services 0.00 399.00
100-1250-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Fire Services 399.00 60761 Invoice 05/02/2025 Building Services 0.00 8,941.00 100-1250-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Building Services 8,941.00 60791 Invoice 05/02/2025 Gen. Srv. Palm, Qik. Quak, Renewable Trk.… 0.00 3,620.00 100-1250-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… General Services 760.00 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… 1700 Palm 47.50
120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Quick Quack 902.50 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Renewable Truck Stop 1,910.00 60796 Invoice 05/02/2025 Gen. Srv., SUSD, Mira., 301 Kidder, Qik.Qu… 0.00 14,570.75 100-1250-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… General Services 1,839.00 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… SUSD 7,306.75
120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Miravale B 164.00 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… 301 Kidder 226.00 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Quick Quack 2,148.00 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… 262 Soledad 2,887.00 B250447 Invoice 05/02/2025 SUSD Housing Project 0.00 213.00 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… SUSD Housing Project 213.00 F250217 Invoice 05/02/2025 Fire Plan Review 0.00 342.50 100-1250-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Fire Plan Review 342.50 CYPRESSCOAST CYPRESS COAST FENCE 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 5,600.00 57253 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 25-02-048 Invoice 05/02/2025 99 Los Coches Fencing 0.00 5,600.00 121-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… 99 Los Coches Fencing 5,600.00 DCTAPPING D C TAPPING INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,133.00 57254 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042825 Invoice 05/02/2025 EP24-031 - Encroachment Permit Deposit … 0.00 1,133.00 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… EP24-031 - Encroachment Permit… 1,133.00 GUERR DAMIAN GUERRERO 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,600.00 57255 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042825 Invoice 05/02/2025 Sidewalk Repair Orchard/San Gabriel (Miss… 0.00 3,000.00 649-0000-52519 MAINTENANCE Sidewalk Repair Orchard/San Ga… 3,000.00 246 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tree Trimming - Soledad & Front Street 0.00 600.00 412-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Tree Trimming - Soledad & Front… 600.00 DATA DATAFLOW BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 533.26 57256 28 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 14 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 420272 Invoice 05/02/2025 Copier - CH 0.00 12.50
100-8000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Copier - CH 12.50
420398 Invoice 05/02/2025 Copier - CH 0.00 520.76
100-8000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Copier - CH 520.76
DAVIDC DAVID CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 7,374.38 57257 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 2402607 Invoice 05/02/2025 Community Center Modernization 0.00 7,374.38 211-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Community Center Modernizati… 7,374.38 DEPFOR DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 825,168.35 57258 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 13083 Invoice 05/02/2025 Training T37 0.00 1,680.00
100-1450-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Training T37 1,680.00 174117 Invoice 05/02/2025 4th Qtr Calfire Contract - FD 0.00 404,286.24 100-1450-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… 4th Qtr Calfire Contract - FD 404,286.24 174523 Invoice 05/02/2025 3rd Qtr CalFire Contract - FD 0.00 419,202.11 100-1450-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… 3rd Qtr CalFire Contract - FD 419,202.11 ELCAMI EL CAMINO ELECTRIC, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 10,582.00 57259 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 7136 Invoice 05/02/2025 Corp Yard Modular Internet Install 0.00 7,757.04 100-3000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Corp Yard Modular Internet Insta… 7,757.04 7141 Invoice 05/02/2025 Troubleshoot Electrical on Chavez 0.00 315.00 100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Troubleshoot Electrical on Chav… 315.00 7145 Invoice 05/02/2025 Lighting at fire House 0.00 2,509.96 100-1450-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Lighting at fire House 2,509.96 ELEMEC ELECTRO-MECH SCOREBOARD CO. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,305.00 57260 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 0043970-IN Invoice 05/02/2025 Scoreboard Controller 0.00 1,305.00 100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Scoreboard Controller 1,305.00 EMCPLA EMC PLANNING GROUP INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,328.52 57261 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 16-001-92 Invoice 05/02/2025 Miramonte Staff Support 0.00 3,328.52 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Miramonte Staff Support 3,328.52 ESO ESO SOLUTIONS, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,090.00 57262 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount ESO-166288 Invoice 05/02/2025 Inspection Prog. - FD 0.00 1,090.00 100-1450-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Inspection Prog. - FD 1,090.00 SOLTEROE ESPERANZA SOLTERO 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 35.00 57263 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 043025 Invoice 05/02/2025 Live Scan Refund 0.00 35.00
100-1310-52110 RECRUITMENT & ADVERT… Live Scan Refund 35.00 EVERBA EVERBANK, N.A. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 8.41 57264 29 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 15 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 42005062 Invoice 05/02/2025 Copier Lease 0.00 8.41
100-1400-52230 LEASE CONTRACTS Copier Lease 8.41
FEDPAS FEDEX 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 61.96 57265
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 8-835-18300 Invoice 05/02/2025 Coupler Shipping 0.00 61.96 310-0000-52042 POSTAGE, SHIPPING & FR… Coupler Shipping 61.96 FEDEXF FEDEX FREIGHT 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,547.84 57266 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 8105781994 Invoice 05/02/2025 Freight Shipping - Motor KSB 0.00 1,547.84 310-0000-52042 POSTAGE, SHIPPING & FR… Freight Shipping - Motor KSB 1,547.84 FERGUSONUS FERGUSON US HOLDINGS, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 14,656.47 57267 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 1885879 Invoice 05/02/2025 Yearly Cell Data Plan 0.00 6,366.56 309-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Yearly Cell Data Plan 6,366.56 1887175 Invoice 05/02/2025 Meter & Register Repairs 0.00 8,289.91 309-0000-52521 METER REPAIR/REPLACE… Meter & Register Repairs 8,289.91 CIT FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 134.95 57268 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 46835878 Invoice 05/02/2025 Copier Lease 0.00 134.95
100-2200-52230 LEASE CONTRACTS Copier Lease 134.95
GAVPRI GAVILAN PRINTERS, LLC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 89.44 57269 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 35594 Invoice 05/02/2025 Business Cards 0.00 89.44
310-0000-52040 OFFICE SUPPLIES Business Cards 89.44
GEOTEC GEOTECH ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,284.04 57270 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount IN00799810 Invoice 05/02/2025 Spare Pump - Collecting 0.00 3,284.04 310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Spare Pump - Collecting 3,284.04 GRAINE GRAINGER 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 35.25 57271
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 9477937016 Invoice 05/02/2025 Poison Placard - Storage Shed 0.00 35.25 310-0000-52052 SAFETY EQUIPMENT Poison Placard - Storage Shed 35.25 GRANIT GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 8,949.75 57272 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 2219488 Invoice 05/02/2025 Provisional Encampment 0.00 8,949.75 121-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Provisional Encampment 8,949.75 BOBMURRY GVP VENTURES, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 11,511.05 57273 30 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 16 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 11072 Invoice 05/02/2025 Police Chief Recruitment 0.00 11,511.05 100-1400-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Police Chief Recruitment 11,511.05 HDLCOR HDL COREN & CONE 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,918.73 57274 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount SIN049892 Invoice 05/02/2025 Property Tax Admin April - June 2025 0.00 1,918.73 100-8000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Property Tax Admin April - June … 1,918.73 HILLYA HILLYARD, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 716.83 57275 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 605759473 Invoice 05/02/2025 Janitorial 0.00 716.83
100-2200-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Janitorial 716.83
HOMEDE HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,739.00 57276 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042125 HD Invoice 05/02/2025 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 1,739.00 100-2100-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Screw Driving Bit Set 120.65 310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Garage Storage Shelving 500.15 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Emergency Bypass Trailer 1,118.20 HYDROT HYDRO TURF INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 283.45 57277 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount I801337 Invoice 05/02/2025 Pop Up Nozzles 0.00 283.45
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Pop Up Nozzles 283.45 REYTIR JESUS REYES 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 185.00 57278 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 014366 Invoice 05/02/2025 Alignment Balance 0.00 130.00 100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Alignment Balance 130.00
014374 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tire Disposal 0.00 55.00
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Tire Disposal 55.00
ALVJOE JOEL ALVAREZ 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 108.03 57279 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042925 Invoice 05/02/2025 Reimbursement For Lunch Training 0.00 108.03 100-8000-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Reimbursement For Lunch Train… 108.03 JOHNELEC JOHNSON ELECTRONICS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 150.00 57280 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 4085738 Invoice 05/02/2025 OLP Fire Alarm 0.00 150.00
651-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… OLP Fire Alarm 150.00 THETRE JOV MAGANA RODRIGUEZ 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 4,600.00 57281 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 1408 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tree Removal FD Site Dist 0.00 4,600.00 211-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Tree Removal FD Site Dist 4,600.00 ALVAREZJ JUDY ALVAREZ 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 35.00 57282 31 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 17 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041725 Invoice 05/02/2025 Live Scan Refund 0.00 35.00
100-1310-52110 RECRUITMENT & ADVERT… Live Scan Refund 35.00 SLAMAK KEITH SLAMA 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 66,746.00 57283 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041525 Invoice 05/02/2025 Reimbursement for Developer Account 14… 0.00 66,746.00 120-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Reimbursement for Developer A… 66,746.00 KSB KSB, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 13,814.45 57284
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount I20000036404 Invoice 05/02/2025 Repairs for WAS Pump 0.00 4,846.67 310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Repairs for WAS Pump 4,846.67 I20000036865 Invoice 05/02/2025 Repairs for Blower Motor 0.00 5,048.13 310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Repairs for Blower Motor 5,048.13 I20000036872 Invoice 05/02/2025 Balance Spencer Blower Coupling 0.00 3,369.65 310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Balance Spencer Blower Coupling 3,369.65 I20000036874 Invoice 05/02/2025 Freight Shipping - Motor 0.00 550.00 310-0000-52042 POSTAGE, SHIPPING & FR… Freight Shipping - Motor 550.00 NORCA KYLE UMIDON 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 6,773.39 57285 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 5996 Invoice 05/02/2025 Vehicle Camera 0.00 3,225.19
100-1400-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… Vehicle Camera 3,225.19 6009 Invoice 05/02/2025 Labor - Cam Installation 0.00 3,548.20 100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Labor - Cam Installation 3,548.20 LNCURT L.N. CURTIS & SON 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 7,208.44 57286 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV932402 Invoice 05/02/2025 Compressor Maint. - FD 0.00 2,128.19 100-3200-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Compressor Maint. - FD 2,128.19 INV938182 Invoice 05/02/2025 Hose Rack - FD 0.00 4,518.99 100-1450-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Hose Rack - FD 4,518.99 INV938958 Invoice 05/02/2025 PPE Cleaner - FD 0.00 210.57 100-1450-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… PPE Cleaner - FD 210.57 INV940055 Invoice 05/02/2025 Equip Maint. FD 0.00 350.69 100-1450-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Equip Maint. FD 350.69 LAWPRO LAWSON PRODUCTS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,836.22 57287 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 9312400806 Invoice 05/02/2025 Degreasing Wipes 0.00 266.66 310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Degreasing Wipes 266.66 9312403915 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tools Restock 0.00 415.88 310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Tools Restock 415.88 9312404535 Invoice 05/02/2025 Lens Cleaner Wipes 0.00 15.44 310-0000-52052 SAFETY EQUIPMENT Lens Cleaner Wipes 15.44 9312408507 Invoice 05/02/2025 Shop Tools Restock 0.00 246.87 310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Shop Tools Restock 246.87 9312415420 Invoice 05/02/2025 Gloves - Shop Restock 0.00 431.21 310-0000-52052 SAFETY EQUIPMENT Gloves - Shop Restock 431.21 9312422688 Invoice 05/02/2025 Screws - Shop Restock 0.00 28.95 32 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 18 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Screws - Shop Restock 28.95 9312433417 Invoice 05/02/2025 Gloves - Restock 0.00 431.21 310-0000-52052 SAFETY EQUIPMENT Gloves - Restock 431.21 LEYTOW LEYVA'S TOWING, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 260.00 57288 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 14592 Invoice 05/02/2025 Goal Boxes 0.00 260.00
100-2100-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Goal Boxes 260.00
LIEBER LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 900.00 57289 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 284047 Invoice 05/02/2025 Liebert Library 0.00 900.00
100-1310-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Liebert Library 900.00 LPZ LPZ TIRE SERVICE INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 25.00 57290 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 0226 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tire Repair 0.00 25.00
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Tire Repair 25.00 MONTPE MONTEREY PENINSULA ENGINEERING 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 300,164.65 57291 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 03-15 Invoice 05/02/2025 Construction - Front St. 0.00 300,164.65 412-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Construction - Front St. 300,164.65 MOTEL6 MOTEL 6 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,919.75 57292
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 9436ACC678 Invoice 05/02/2025 Motel Voucher 0.00 3,919.75 121-0000-52190 RENT/UTILITY ASSISTANCE Motel Voucher 3,919.75 MPEXPR MP EXPRESS, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 956.97 57293 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 77093 Invoice 05/02/2025 Thank You Cards 0.00 188.75
100-2400-52115 SUNDRY Thank You Cards 188.75
77620 Invoice 05/02/2025 AV - Tags 0.00 768.22
418-0000-52015 SUBSCRIPTIONS AV - Tags 768.22
ONE WO ONE WORKPLACE L. FERRARI 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 39,525.01 57294 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 177978 Invoice 05/02/2025 Chambers Renovation 0.00 39,525.01 100-3000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Chambers Renovation 39,525.01 OREAUT O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 598.87 57295 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 3566-243066 Invoice 05/02/2025 Door Hinge Pin 0.00 43.23 100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Door Hinge Pin 43.23
3566-243159 Invoice 05/02/2025 Brake Pads 0.00 49.16
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Brake Pads 49.16
3566-243292 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tape - Sewer Monitor Install 0.00 14.19 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Tape - Sewer Monitor Install 14.19 3566-243376 Invoice 05/02/2025 Oil 0.00 25.12
309-0000-52533 WELL MAINTENANCE PR… Oil 25.12
33 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 19 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 3566-243559 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tool Rental 0.00 17.47
100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Tool Rental 17.47
3566-243592 Invoice 05/02/2025 Preventive Maint. 0.00 49.33 100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Preventive Maint. 49.33
3566-244289 Invoice 05/02/2025 Safety Switch 0.00 55.09 100-2100-52080 FLEET SERVICES Safety Switch 55.09
3566-244457 Invoice 05/02/2025 Radiator Drain Plug 0.00 6.92 100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Radiator Drain Plug 6.92
3566-244512 Invoice 05/02/2025 Winch Relay 0.00 11.48
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Winch Relay 11.48
3566-244522 Invoice 05/02/2025 Brake Repairs 0.00 185.71 310-0000-52080 FLEET SERVICES Brake Repairs 185.71
3566-244524 Invoice 05/02/2025 Oil 0.00 54.60
310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Oil 54.60
3566-244696 Invoice 05/02/2025 Oil Change 0.00 60.38
309-0000-52080 FLEET SERVICES Oil Change 60.38
3566-245200 Invoice 05/02/2025 Coll. Service Truck 0.00 43.66 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Coll. Service Truck 43.66 3566-245377 Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Credit 0.00 -17.47
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Credit -17.47
P.G.E. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 93,842.35 57296 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041425 Invoice 05/02/2025 Orchard Park 0.00 250.08
651-0000-52400 UTILITIES Orchard Park 250.08
041425B Invoice 05/02/2025 Lights 0.00 55.33
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Lights 55.33
041425C Invoice 05/02/2025 Water 0.00 35,413.04
309-0000-52400 UTILITIES Water 35,413.04
041425D Invoice 05/02/2025 Gallardo Park Lights 0.00 1,380.16 100-2100-52400 UTILITIES Gallardo Park Lights 1,380.16
041425E Invoice 05/02/2025 Signals 0.00 243.74
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Signals 243.74
041425F Invoice 05/02/2025 Lights 0.00 8.02
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Lights 8.02
041425G Invoice 05/02/2025 Signals 0.00 185.30
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Signals 185.30
041425H Invoice 05/02/2025 Miravale II St. Lights 0.00 134.59 651-0000-52422 STREET LIGHTING Miravale II St. Lights 134.59 041425I Invoice 05/02/2025 Lights 0.00 9,966.40
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Lights 9,966.40
041525 Invoice 05/02/2025 Utilities 0.00 948.11
100-1450-52400 UTILITIES Utilities 948.11
041525B Invoice 05/02/2025 Signals 0.00 83.60
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Signals 83.60
041525C Invoice 05/02/2025 Utilities 0.00 5,966.78
100-2100-52400 UTILITIES Utilities 718.45
100-8000-52400 UTILITIES Utilities 5,369.66
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Utilities -121.33
041625 Invoice 05/02/2025 Lights 0.00 122.76
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Lights 122.76
041625B Invoice 05/02/2025 255 Soledad 0.00 589.21
34 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 20 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 100-1400-52400 UTILITIES 255 Soledad 589.21
041625C Invoice 05/02/2025 Signals 0.00 15.00
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Signals 15.00
041625D Invoice 05/02/2025 Water 0.00 13,370.04
309-0000-52400 UTILITIES Water 13,370.04
041625E Invoice 05/02/2025 Mora Cir. - Workforce Housing 0.00 12.97 100-1200-52400 UTILITIES Mora Cir. - Workforce Housing 12.97 041825 Invoice 05/02/2025 Lights 0.00 3,174.56
100-1450-52400 UTILITIES Lights 576.10
410-0000-52400 UTILITIES Lights 2,598.46
042225 Invoice 05/02/2025 Community Center 0.00 3,315.77 100-2200-52400 UTILITIES Community Center 3,315.77
042325 Invoice 05/02/2025 WWTP 0.00 18,606.89
310-0000-52400 UTILITIES WWTP 18,606.89
VALENZUELAP PATRICK VALENZUELA 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 350.70 57297 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041125 Invoice 05/02/2025 Travel Reimbursement for Interviewee 0.00 350.70 100-1310-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Travel Reimbursement for Interv… 350.70 PURPOW PITNEY BOWES BANK INC PURCHASE POWER 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 181.06 57298 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041125 Invoice 05/02/2025 Postage 0.00 181.06
100-8000-52042 POSTAGE, SHIPPING & FR… Postage 181.06
PLUMMERBUILT PLUMMERBUILT INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 406,951.50 57299 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 202516 Invoice 05/02/2025 WRF Metal Building 0.00 406,951.50 310-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… WRF Metal Building 406,951.50 PRINCI PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,074.34 57300 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042425 Invoice 05/02/2025 Annual Bill Adjust. For Dental & Vision 0.00 3,074.34 402-0000-51250 DENTAL PREMIUM Annual Bill Adjust. For Dental & … 3,074.34 QUICOM QUINN COMPANY 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 990.53 57301 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount WON20014449 Invoice 05/02/2025 Emerg. Generator Repair 0.00 990.53 100-2200-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Emerg. Generator Repair 990.53 RAILRO RAILROAD MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 967.16 57302 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 524782 Invoice 05/02/2025 Water Pipeline Agreement 0.00 967.16 309-0000-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… Water Pipeline Agreement 967.16 TERMIN RENTOKIL NORTH AMERICA INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 60.00 57303 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 14601157 Invoice 05/02/2025 Pest Control - FD 0.00 60.00 100-1450-52400 UTILITIES Pest Control - FD 60.00
AGUILA ROLANDO AGUILAR 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 136.52 57304 35 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 21 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041725 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tiny Chefs Ingredients 0.00 92.84 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Tiny Chefs Ingredients 92.84 041725 B Invoice 05/02/2025 Tide Pods 0.00 43.68
100-2200-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Tide Pods 43.68
ROSSRE ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 767.87 57305 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount I27259 Invoice 05/02/2025 Dogi-Bags 0.00 767.87
651-0000-52522 PARK MAINTENANCE Dogi-Bags 767.87
MY JEE SALINAS LINCOLN MERCURY, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 139.55 57306 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 262860 Invoice 05/02/2025 Brake Line 0.00 123.24
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Brake Line 123.24
262891 Invoice 05/02/2025 Seat Belt 0.00 136.49
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Seat Belt 136.49
CM262512 Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Credit 0.00 -38.24
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Credit -38.24
CM262513 Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Credit 0.00 -81.94
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Credit -81.94
SANVICENTE SAN VICENTE SOLEDAD 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 126.46 57307 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042925 Invoice 05/02/2025 Cancellation of Permit #250034 0.00 126.46 100-0000-21263 STATE GREEN BUILDING … Cancellation of Permit #250034 1.00 100-0000-21264 STRONG MOTION IMPACT… Cancellation of Permit #250034 0.50 100-0000-42300 BUILDING PERMITS Cancellation of Permit #250034 118.09 100-0000-46115 BUILDING DEPARTMENT … Cancellation of Permit #250034 2.00 100-0000-46120 BUILDING DEPT. TRAININ… Cancellation of Permit #250034 3.54 100-0000-46125 BUILDING DOCUMENT ST… Cancellation of Permit #250034 1.33 GARCIAS SARA GARCIA 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 21,186.45 57308 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041725 Invoice 05/02/2025 CDBG Bus Loan-Working Capital 0.00 5,250.00 214-0000-52131 BUSINESS LOANS CDBG Bus Loan-Working Capital 5,250.00 041725B Invoice 05/02/2025 CDBG Bus Loan-Reimbursement For Trailer… 0.00 15,000.00 214-0000-52131 BUSINESS LOANS CDBG Bus Loan-Reimbursement … 15,000.00 041725C Invoice 05/02/2025 CDBG Bus Loan Reimbursement for Invent… 0.00 936.45 214-0000-52131 BUSINESS LOANS CDBG Bus Loan Reimbursement … 936.45 GARCIAS SARA GARCIA 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 -21,186.45 57308 SCHWHE SCHAAF & WHEELER 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 12,257.50 57309 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 41052 Invoice 05/02/2025 Storm Drain Master Plan 0.00 12,257.50 310-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Storm Drain Master Plan 12,257.50 SIGIRR SIGNATURE IRRIGATION 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 161.26 57310 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 55502CM Credit Memo 05/02/2025 Parts Return 0.00 -141.30 310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Parts Return -141.30 36 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 22 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 55624 Invoice 05/02/2025 Provisional Encampment 0.00 302.56 121-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Provisional Encampment 302.56 SOLAUT SOLEDAD AUTO PARTS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 645.95 57311 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 188532 Invoice 05/02/2025 Gearbox Hardware 0.00 92.14
310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Gearbox Hardware 92.14 188558 Invoice 05/02/2025 Oil for Small Engines 0.00 137.62 310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Oil for Small Engines 137.62 188570 Invoice 05/02/2025 Electric & Hand Transfer Pump 0.00 416.19 310-0000-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Electric & Hand Transfer Pump 416.19 SOLTRU SOLEDAD TRUE VALUE 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 193.29 57312 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 349894 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tool Drill Set 0.00 30.58
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Tool Drill Set 30.58 350352 Invoice 05/02/2025 Drain Cleaning 0.00 26.21
100-2100-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Drain Cleaning 26.21
350371 Invoice 05/02/2025 Door Nut Driver 0.00 9.82
100-8000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Door Nut Driver 9.82 350490 Invoice 05/02/2025 Ball Pin & Clip 0.00 36.04
651-0000-52522 PARK MAINTENANCE Ball Pin & Clip 36.04
351280 Invoice 05/02/2025 Park Supplies 0.00 12.01
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Park Supplies 12.01 351477 Invoice 05/02/2025 Lysol, Nylon Rope 0.00 34.94
100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Lysol, Nylon Rope 34.94 352846 Invoice 05/02/2025 Supplies - Sewer Monitor 0.00 43.69 310-0000-52134 COLLECTION SYSTEM MA… Supplies - Sewer Monitor 43.69 SPECT SPECTRUM 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 285.02 57313
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 107895501040725 Invoice 05/02/2025 City Hall Backup Internet 0.00 285.02 100-1320-52520 MAINTENANCE AGREEM… City Hall Backup Internet 285.02 STAPLE STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 2,097.10 57314 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 6030297506 Invoice 05/02/2025 Toner 0.00 1,057.96
100-1400-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… Toner 1,057.96
6030297507 Invoice 05/02/2025 Prop/Evidence 0.00 114.26 100-1400-52050 PROPERTY EVIDENCE RO… Prop/Evidence 114.26 6030297508 Invoice 05/02/2025 Office Supplies 0.00 17.68 100-1400-52040 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 17.68
6030297509 Invoice 05/02/2025 Prop/Evidence 0.00 249.49 100-1400-52050 PROPERTY EVIDENCE RO… Prop/Evidence 249.49 6030297510 Invoice 05/02/2025 Prop/Evidence 0.00 30.91
100-1400-52050 PROPERTY EVIDENCE RO… Prop/Evidence 30.91 6030297511 Invoice 05/02/2025 Office Supplies 0.00 11.67 100-1400-52040 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 11.67
6030297512 Invoice 05/02/2025 Office Supplies 0.00 18.45 100-1400-52040 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 18.45
6030297513 Invoice 05/02/2025 Office Supplies 0.00 404.68 37 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 23 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 100-1400-52040 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 404.68
6030297514 Invoice 05/02/2025 Office Supplies 0.00 20.31 100-1400-52040 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 20.31
6030297515 Invoice 05/02/2025 Office Supplies 0.00 171.69 100-1400-52040 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 171.69
TL ENG TL ENGINEERING 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,750.00 57315 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 1695 Invoice 05/02/2025 On Call Traffic Engineering 0.00 1,750.00 211-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… On Call Traffic Engineering 1,500.00 410-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… On Call Traffic Engineering 250.00 TMOBIL T-MOBILE USA, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 371.42 57316 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041225 Invoice 05/02/2025 CM / Council Cell 0.00 371.42 100-1000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE Council 267.36
100-1100-52415 CELLULAR PHONE CM 104.06
TMOBIL T-MOBILE USA, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,463.95 57317 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042125B Invoice 05/02/2025 Cell Phones 0.00 1,463.95
100-1400-52415 CELLULAR PHONE PW Parks / Streets Cell 32.12 100-1500-52415 CELLULAR PHONE PW Parks / Streets Cell 33.95 100-2100-52415 CELLULAR PHONE PW Parks / Streets Cell 213.67 309-0000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE Water Dept. Cell 276.92
309-0000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE PW Parks / Streets Cell 29.55 310-0000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE WWTP Dept Cell 682.87
310-0000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE PW Parks / Streets Cell 29.55 311-0000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE PW Parks / Streets Cell 9.75 312-0000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE PW Parks / Streets Cell 36.99 410-0000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE PW Parks / Streets Cell 118.58 TMOBIL T-MOBILE USA, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 140.76 57318 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042125 Invoice 05/02/2025 IT Cell Service 0.00 140.76
100-1320-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… IT Cell Service 140.76 TMOBIL T-MOBILE USA, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 1,074.94 57319 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041225C Invoice 05/02/2025 Phone Service 0.00 1,074.94
100-1400-52410 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER Phone Service 1,074.94 TMOBIL T-MOBILE USA, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 342.06 57320 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041225B Invoice 05/02/2025 Cell Phones LED 0.00 342.06
100-1200-52415 CELLULAR PHONE Cell Phones LED 342.06
TOPES TOPE'S TREE SERVICE, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 7,220.00 57321 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 343296 Invoice 05/02/2025 Tree Trimming Project 0.00 7,220.00 410-0000-52531 STREET MAINTENANCE Tree Trimming Project 7,220.00 TRICIT TRI-CITIES DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 162,889.04 57322 38 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 24 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 2025-04 Invoice 05/02/2025 Garbage Fees / April 2025 0.00 162,889.04 311-0000-52230 LEASE CONTRACTS Garbage Fees / April 2025 162,889.04 TRINIP TRINIDAD ZAVALA 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 366.98 57323 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 25-0313 JC Invoice 05/02/2025 Faucet Stem Replacement 0.00 214.99 100-2100-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Faucet Stem Replacement 214.99 25-0313 NK Invoice 05/02/2025 Water Heater Repair 0.00 151.99 100-1400-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Water Heater Repair 151.99 USBANP U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEM 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 13,219.27 57324 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 040725 DW Invoice 05/02/2025 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 2,118.30 100-1400-52051 TOOLS & MINOR EQUIPM… Tools -799.00
100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Training 1,074.50 100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Hotel 328.40
100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Training -304.83 100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Hotel 869.48
100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Hotel 929.76
100-1400-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… Software 19.99
040725FD Invoice 05/02/2025 Meals for CAL Fire Paint Crew 0.00 119.27 100-1450-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Meals for CAL Fire Paint Crew 73.12 100-1450-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Meals for CAL FIRE Paint Crew 46.15 040725FL Invoice 05/02/2025 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 4,696.01 100-1400-52070 FOOD SERVICES Pizza 274.13
100-1400-52070 FOOD SERVICES Drinks 40.53
100-1400-52070 FOOD SERVICES Food 270.07
100-1400-52070 FOOD SERVICES Cookies, Treats, Chocolate 47.20 100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Tint 666.49
100-1400-52080 FLEET SERVICES Tint 442.66
100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Training 1,174.15 100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Training 1,037.60 100-1400-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Cable 229.22
100-1400-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… Toner 331.85
100-1400-57100 CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMP… Mount 182.11
040725FU Invoice 05/02/2025 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 1,974.27 100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Hotel - Training Prop. & Evidence… 1,231.65 100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Hotel - Training Acting LT J. Sant… 77.36 100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Hotel - Training Victims Advocat… 162.46 100-1400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Hotel - Training Police Records S.… 502.80 040725JL Invoice 05/02/2025 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 420.64 100-1450-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Hotel Room for Travel to Fontan… 148.23 100-1450-52400 UTILITIES Dish Network 168.49
100-1450-52410 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER Verizon - Data for Ipads on Equi… 80.02 100-1450-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… O'Reily - Maintenance Supplies -… 23.90 040725JP Invoice 05/02/2025 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 3,430.34 100-2200-52049 PRINTING & ADVERTISING Email Processor App 39.25 100-2200-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Accidental CC Charge 16.97 100-2200-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… CPRS Conference 519.11 100-2200-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… CPRS Conference 1,141.83 100-2200-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… CPRS Conference 631.41 100-2200-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… CPRS Conference 556.41 100-2200-52105 SPECIAL EVENTS NRPA-Youth Day 525.36
040725REC Invoice 05/02/2025 Credit Card Purchases 0.00 460.44 39 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 25 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Pre-K Program - Little Einsteins 3.70 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Programs - Easy Baking 15.98 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Pre-K - Tiny Chefs 36.81 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Programs - Easy Baking 38.29 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Pre-K - Tiny Chefs 20.86 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Programs - Easy Baking 33.21 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Programs - Easy Baking 35.08 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Senior - SoCO Social 16.79 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Pre-K - Little Einsteins 29.31 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Programs - Easy Baking 10.14 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Programs - Easy Baking 10.72 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Senior - Sit N Strech 11.98 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Senior - Sit N Stretch 1.99 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Senior - Morning Club 7.73 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Programs - Easy Baking 30.42 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Youth Programs - Easy Baking 78.33 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Senior - SoCo Social 17.62 100-2200-52031 PROGRAM SUPPLIES Pre-K - Little Einsteins 2.50 100-2200-52040 OFFICE SUPPLIES Envelopes 5.01
100-2200-52115 SUNDRY Water Bottles For Sale 41.98
100-2200-52518 FACILITIES EXPENSE Facility - Music 11.99 **Void** 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 0.00 57325
VOYAG US BANK VOYAGER FLEET SYSTEMS, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 15,941.79 57326 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 042425 Invoice 05/02/2025 Fuel 0.00 15,941.79
100-1400-52085 FUEL PD Fuel 5,221.73
100-1400-52086 FUEL PW Units 170.20
100-1450-52086 FUEL Fire Dept. Fuel 2,860.83
100-2100-52085 FUEL PW Units 1,510.73
100-2100-52085 FUEL PW Units 57.07
100-2400-52091 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TRA… Community Engagement 84.82 100-8000-52080 FLEET SERVICES Multi Use 743.56
309-0000-52085 FUEL Water Fuel 1,581.39
310-0000-52085 FUEL WWTP Fuel 2,189.83
311-0000-52085 FUEL PW Units 21.84
312-0000-52085 FUEL ACO Fuel 569.28
312-0000-52085 FUEL PW Units 251.40
410-0000-52085 FUEL PW Units 679.11
UTILTE UTILITY TELECOM GROUP, LLC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 4,446.89 57327 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 90239000000025…Invoice 05/02/2025 City Phones 0.00 4,446.89 100-8000-52410 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER City Phones 4,446.89 VALELE VALLEY ELECTRIC MOTOR SERVICE, INC. 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 300.15 57328 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 33726 Invoice 05/02/2025 Remove W3 Motor Repairs 0.00 300.15 310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Remove W3 Motor Repairs 300.15 VASQUF VASQUEZ FABRICATION, INC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 5,058.32 57329 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 744 Invoice 05/02/2025 Emergency Repair 0.00 4,598.48
309-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Emergency Repair 4,598.48 748 Invoice 05/02/2025 Straps Diesel Holding Tank 0.00 459.84 40 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 26 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… Straps Diesel Holding Tank 459.84 VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 38.52 57330 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 6111630212 Invoice 05/02/2025 WFR Data Service 0.00 38.52 309-0000-52415 CELLULAR PHONE WFR Data Service 38.52
WALLAC WALLACE GROUP 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 37,651.35 57331 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 64852 Invoice 05/02/2025 Recycled Water Project 0.00 405.00 213-0000-52200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES… Recycled Water Project 405.00 64853 Invoice 05/02/2025 CM Front St. Proj. 0.00 27,601.85 412-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… CM Front St. Proj. 27,601.85 64854 Invoice 05/02/2025 Pedestrian Safety HSIP 10 0.00 3,704.25 410-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Pedestrian Safety HSIP 10 3,704.25 64862 Invoice 05/02/2025 Front St. Landscaping Proj. 0.00 5,940.25 412-0000-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Front St. Landscaping Proj. 5,940.25 XNAUT X-NAUT LLC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 71.95 57332
Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 4636 Invoice 05/02/2025 Ipad Mount Tax - FD 0.00 71.95
100-1450-57000 CAPITAL OUTLAY - IMPR… Ipad Mount Tax - FD 71.95 Z&M EN Z&M ENTERPRISE, LLC 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 3,978.46 57333 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 1429 Invoice 05/02/2025 UV Station 0.00 3,978.46
310-0000-52525 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE… UV Station 3,978.46 GARCIAS SARA GARCIA 05/02/2025 Regular 0.00 21,186.45 57343 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 041725 B2 Invoice 05/02/2025 CDBG Buss Loan-Reimbursement For Trail… 0.00 15,000.00 214-0000-52131 BUSINESS LOANS CDBG Buss Loan-Reimbursement… 15,000.00 041725 C2 Invoice 05/02/2025 CDBG Bus Loan-Reimbursement For Inven… 0.00 936.45 214-0000-52131 BUSINESS LOANS CDBG Bus Loan-Reimbursement … 936.45 041725A Invoice 05/02/2025 CDBG Bus Loan-Working Capital 0.00 5,250.00 214-0000-52131 BUSINESS LOANS CDBG Bus Loan-Working Capital 5,250.00 Total Regular: 0.00 2,392,834.51
41 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 27 of 28
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payment Type: Bank Draft
EFTPS EFTPS 05/02/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 8,928.78 DFT0000057 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000497 Invoice 05/02/2025 MEDICARE W/H 0.00 8,928.78 100-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 5,191.00 121-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 67.18 309-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 773.40 310-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 2,005.62 311-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 174.36 312-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 138.66 410-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 520.14 416-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 33.30 531-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE MEDICARE W/H 25.12 EFTPS EFTPS 05/02/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 38,177.84 DFT0000058 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000498 Invoice 05/02/2025 FICA W/H 0.00 38,177.84
100-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 22,195.10 121-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 287.22
309-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 3,306.92
310-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 8,575.66
311-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 746.22
312-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 592.56
410-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 2,224.32
416-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 142.36
531-0000-21110 FICA/MEDICARE PAYABLE FICA W/H 107.48
EFTPS EFTPS 05/02/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 28,931.91 DFT0000059 Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount INV0000500 Invoice 05/02/2025 FEDERAL TAX 0.00 28,931.91 100-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 17,657.37 121-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 214.10
309-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 2,359.41 310-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 6,341.47 311-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 527.90
312-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 350.70
410-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 1,269.17 416-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 128.80
531-0000-21120 FEDERAL TAX PAYABLE FEDERAL TAX 82.99
Total Bank Draft: 0.00 76,038.53
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code APRAB Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
117
0 5
3 14

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 139 0.00
Payment
2,414,045.96

0.00 -21,211.45
76,038.53
269,326.69
2,738,199.73
Payable
Count
314
0 0
3 24
341
42 Check Report Date Range: 04/25/2025 - 05/13/2025
5/13/2025 6:55:30 PM Page 28 of 28
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
117
0 5
3 14

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 139 0.00
2,414,045.96

0.00 -21,211.45
76,038.53
269,326.69
2,738,199.73
314
0 0
3 24
341
Fund Name Period Amount
Fund Summary
999 POOLED CASH 4/2025 120,419.33
999 POOLED CASH 5/2025 2,617,780.40
2,738,199.73
43 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 6228, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with EMC Planning Group, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $120,000 to Provide Planning Services for the Renewable Oasis Truck Stop Project
TO: Honorable Mayor Anna Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Beatriz Trujillo, Community and Economic Development Director, Ariana Mora, Senior Planner
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025

CITY OF SOLEDAD

STAFF REPORT
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Soledad consider and adopt Resolution No.6228, "Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with EMC Planning Group, Inc. in an Amount Not to exceed $120,000 to Provide Planning Services for the Renewable Oasis Truck Stop Project".

Executive Summary
1850 Properties ("Developer") submitted an application for the development of a Renewable Oasis Truck Stop ("Project") on a 19.33-acre site located at the corner of H. De La Rosa St. and Nestles Rd. (APN 022-224-005). The Project proposes gasoline, diesel, and hydrogen fueling pumps for both passenger vehicles and trucks, a convenience store, a quick-serve restaurant, a truck maintenance and wash facility, a rest area, and truck parking areas. EMC, an authorized City planning services provider, has provided a proposal for an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) totaling $115,250 for the Project. Staff is proposing a new standalone contract in an amount not to exceed $120,000 to cover the IS/MND cost and a contingency for this Project. These services will be fully funded by the Developer through an existing Reimbursement Agreement that is already in place.

Background
In November 2023, 1850 Properties ("Developer") submitted an application to the City of Soledad for the proposed Soledad Renewable Oasis Project ("Project"). The Project site is located at 701 Nestles Road in Monterey County and encompasses approximately 20 acres of undeveloped land. The proposed development includes the construction of a truck depot and associated infrastructure, incorporating renewable energy components intended to support sustainable transportation and 44 commercial operations. The Project is designed to serve the operational needs of the trucking industry while incorporating features that may reduce environmental impacts.

As proposed, the Project reflects an effort to balance commercial development with environmental considerations. The Project is intended to serve long-haul truck drivers, local traffic, and travelers along Highway 101 by providing a range of services, including fuel, vehicle maintenance, dining options, and a rest area. The development will include both conventional and renewable energy features, with the goal of supporting a more sustainable and forward-looking transportation hub.

The City has been contracting with EMC Planning Group ("EMC") for periodic planning assistance as development projects arise since 2016. In response to a solicitation from the City, EMC provided a proposal for the IS in support of a MND for the Project. This proposal is included as Attachment 1 for City Council review and consideration. Approval of the proposal would be authorized through an executed standard City contract, provided as Exhibit A.

Review & Analysis
As noted above, EMC has submitted a proposal to prepare an IS for the Project in accordance with CEQA. The purpose of the IS is to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the project and to determine the appropriate level of environmental documentation—either a Negative Declaration (ND), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), or Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Commercial truck stop developments, such as the proposed project, have the potential to result in various environmental impacts, including increased air emissions from heavy-duty vehicles, noise from continuous operations, traffic and circulation effects, and the use and storage of hazardous materials related to fueling and maintenance. Other areas of consideration include water quality, greenhouse gas emissions, biological resources, and land use compatibility. The IS provides a framework for assessing these impacts and identifying mitigation measures where necessary. It also facilitates early input from public agencies and the community to ensure environmental considerations are addressed prior to project approval.

Based on the preliminary review, City staff anticipates that preparation of an IS/MND will be sufficient to meet CEQA requirements. However, if it is later determined that the Project may result in significant and unavoidable impacts, an EIR would be required. In that case, the scope of work and budget would need to be amended to include additional technical studies and the preparation of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

EMC’s proposal is to prepare the Project IS/MND for the amount of $115,250, with a contract term through December 31, 2025. The proposal is included as Attachment 1, and the draft agreement is provided as Exhibit A. To allow flexibility for unforeseen circumstances, the staff recommends that the City Council approve a not-to-exceed amount of $120,000, which will be 100% funded by the developer.

Approval of the agreement will enable staff to initiate the technical work necessary to complete the IS/MND and move the project forward. The associated entitlement process, including the Conditional Use Permit (CUP), is currently on hold pending completion and certification of the environmental document. Final project consideration, including approval of the CUP and certification of the IS/MND, is anticipated to be brought before the City Council later this year following a recommendation from the Planning Commission, pursuant to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Soledad Municipal Code.

The Developer has reviewed and agreed to the terms outlined in Attachment 2. Staff recommends that 45 Resolution No. 6228
Exhibit A
Renewable Oasis Truck Stop - EMC proposal
Soledad Renewable Truck Depot
the City Council authorize the execution of the agreement to allow environmental review to proceed.

The Project is intended to meet the City’s Economic Development goals by serving truck drivers, local traffic, and Highway 101 travelers with a full range of services, including fueling, maintenance, dining, and rest areas. It will incorporate both conventional and renewable energy features to support a more sustainable and future-oriented transportation hub.

Financial Considerations
The budget for the proposed scope of work from EMC Planning Group is $115,250. However, staff recommends that the agreement be approved for an amount not to exceed $120,000 to allow for contingencies in case additional technical support is needed. The developer will fully fund the costs for this agreement through an existing executed reimbursement agreement managed by the Community and Economic Development Department. The developer has been working with the city to maintain sufficient funds in the project’s reimbursement account. Upon approval of this agreement, the applicant will be required to deposit additional funding. Insufficient funds in the developer’s account will prompt the Community and Economic Development Director to halt work until adequate funds are deposited.

If this project is developed, it could generate significant sales tax revenue and an increase in property taxes for the city.

Alternatives
Approve the Resolution.

Modify the Resolution and provide other direction to Staff.

Deny the Resolution. This is not recommended as the Staff would have to pause this project, which advances the City's economic development goals.

Planning/CEQA
The proposed agreement in itself is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA( (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378). Rather, approval of the agreement would allow the City to initiate the EIR in order to comply with CEQA.

Public Notice Requirements
None required.

Attachment(s):
46 RESOLUTION NO. 6228

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLEDAD

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH EMC PLANNING GROUP, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $120,000 TO PROVIDE PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE RENEWABLE OASIS TRUCK STOP PROJECT.

WHEREAS, the City has received a request from 1850 Properties (“Developer”) to develop the Renewable Oasis Truck Stop Project (“Project”) with gasoline, diesel, and hydrogen fueling pumps for both passenger vehicles and trucks, a convenience store, quick -serve restaurant, truck maintenance and wash facility, rest area and truck parking areas, on a19.33-acre site on the corner of H. De La Rosa St. and Nestles Rd. (APN 022-224-005); and WHEREAS, the Project requires the completion of an entitlement process including a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and environmental review to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, since 2016, the City has worked with EMC Planning Group, Inc. to provide on-call planning services for multiple planning tasks, including CEQA assistance, preparation, and compliance; and
WHEREAS, Staff requested and received a proposal from EMC to prepare an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project for a cost of $115,250; and WHEREAS, Staff is recommending that the amount of the contract be increased to $120,000 and the timeline be extended to December 31, 2025, to allow for additional funding and to account for unforeseen circumstances that could cause delays or result in added cost; and

WHEREAS, funding for the Agreement will be paid entirely by the Developer through a Reimbursement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, this Project will contribute to the implementation of the 2005 General Plan and Economic Development goals.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Soledad that the Council approves a Professional Services Agreement between the City and EMC Planning Group, Inc. for environmental analysis of the Renewable Oasis Truck Stop Project in an amount not to exceed $120,000, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein, and the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute the same on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Soledad duly held on the 21st day of May 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, in favor thereof, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:
47 ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

ANNA M. VELAZQUEZ, Mayor
ATTEST:

MEGAN HUNTER, City Clerk
48 Exhibit A

CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF SOLEDAD AND
EMC PLANNING GROUP INC.

THIS AGREEMENT for consulting services is made by and between the City of Soledad (“City”) and EMC Planning Group Inc (“Consultant”) (together referred to as the “Parties”) as of _________________ (the “Effective Date”).

Section 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in the Scope of Work attached as Exhibit A , and incorporated herein, at the time and place and in the manner specified therein. In the event of a conflict in or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and Exhibit A, the Agreement shall prevail.

1.1 Term of Services. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall end on December 1, 2025, unless the term of the Agreement is otherwise terminated or extended, as provided for in Section 8. The time provided to Consultant to complete the services required by this Agreement shall not affect the City’s right to terminate the Agreement, as referenced in Section 8.

1.2 Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged.

1.3 Assignment of Personnel. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the reassignment of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from City of such desire of City, reassign such person or persons.

1.4 Time. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to meet the standard of performance provided in Section 1.1 above and to satisfy Consultant’s obligations hereunder.

1.5 Public Works Requirements.

Intentionally Left Blank
Section 2. COMPENSATION. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a not-to-exceed amount of $120,000.00 notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in Consultant’s proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Consultant’s proposal, attached as Exhibit A, regarding the amount of compensation, the Agreement shall prevail. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth herein. The payments specified below shall be the only payments from City to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all invoices to City in the manner specified herein. Except as specifically authorized by City in writing, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. 49 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 2 of 14
Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that compensation paid by City to Consultant under this Agreement is based upon Consultant’s estimated costs of providing the services required hereunder, including salaries and benefits of employees and subcontractors of Consultant. Consequently, the parties further agree that compensation hereunder is intended to include the costs of contributions to any pensions and/or annuities to which Consultant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors may be eligible. City therefore has no responsibility for such contributions beyond compensation required under this Agreement.

2.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit invoices, not more often than once a month during the term of this Agreement, based on the cost for services performed and reimbursable costs incurred prior to the invoice date. Invoices shall contain the following information:
 Serial identifications of progress bills; i.e., Progress Bill No. 1 for the first invoice, etc.;
 The beginning and ending dates of the billing period;  A Task Summary containing the original contract amount, the amount of prior billings, the total due this period, the balance available under the Agreement, and the percentage of completion;
 At City’s option, for each work item in each task, a copy of the applicable time entries or time sheets shall be submitted showing the name of the person doing the work, the hours spent by each person, a brief description of the work, and each reimbursable expense;
 The total number of hours of work performed under the Agreement by Consultant and each employee, agent, and subcontractor of Consultant performing services hereunder;
 The Consultant’s signature;
 Consultant shall give separate notice to the City when the total number of hours worked by Consultant and any individual employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant reaches or exceeds 800 hours within a 12-month period under this Agreement and any other agreement between Consultant and City. Such notice shall include an estimate of the time necessary to complete work described in a given task order and the estimate of time necessary to complete work under any other agreement between Consultant and City, if applicable.

2.2 Monthly Payment. City shall make monthly payments, based on invoices received, for services satisfactorily performed, and for authorized reimbursable costs incurred. City shall have 30 days from the receipt of an invoice that complies with all of the requirements above to pay Consultant.

2.3 Final Payment. City shall pay the last 10% of the total sum due pursuant to each task order within 60 days after completion of the services and submittal to City of a final invoice, if all services required have been satisfactorily performed.

2.4 Total Payment. City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall make no payment for any extra, further, or additional service pursuant to this Agreement. 50 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 3 of 14
In no event shall Consultant submit any invoice for an amount in excess of the maximum amount of compensation provided above either for a task or for the entire Agreement, unless the Agreement is modified prior to the submission of such an invoice by a properly executed change order or amendment.

2.5 Hourly Fees. Fees for work performed by Consultant on an hourly basis shall not exceed the amounts shown on the compensation schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A.

2.6 Reimbursable Expenses. Reimbursable expenses are included in the total amount of compensation provided under this Agreement that shall not be exceeded.

2.7 Payment of Taxes. Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.

2.8 Payment upon Termination. In the event that the City or Consultant terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 8, the City shall compensate the Consultant for all outstanding costs and reimbursable expenses incurred for work satisfactorily completed as of the date of written notice of termination. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and timesheets to verify costs incurred to that date.

2.9 Authorization to Perform Services. The Consultant is not authorized to perform any services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of authorization from the Contract Administrator.

Section 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth herein, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment that may be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in this section, and only under the terms and conditions set forth herein.

City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be reasonably necessary for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of the City. The location, quantity, and time of furnishing those facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long-distance telephone or other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.

Section 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant, at its own cost and expense, unless otherwise specified below, shall procure the types and amounts of insurance listed below against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant and its agents, representatives, employees, and subcontractors. Consistent with the following provisions, Consultant shall provide proof satisfactory to City of such insurance that meets the requirements of this section and under forms of insurance satisfactory in all respects, and that such insurance is in effect prior to beginning work to the City. Consultant shall maintain the insurance policies required by this section throughout the term of this Agreement. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Consultant's bid. Consultant shall not allow 51 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 4 of 14
any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until Consultant has obtained all insurance required herein for the subcontractor(s) and provided evidence that such insurance is in effect to City. Verification of the required insurance shall be submitted and made part of this Agreement prior to execution. Consultant shall maintain all required insurance listed herein for the duration of this Agreement.

4.1 Workers’ Compensation. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by Consultant. The Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than $2,000,000 per accident. In the alternative, Consultant may rely on a selfinsurance program to meet those requirements, but only if the program of self-insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code. Determination of whether a self-insurance program meets the standards of the Labor Code shall be solely in the discretion of the Contract Administrator. The insurer, if insurance is provided, or the Consultant, if a program of self-insurance is provided, shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers for loss arising from work performed under this Agreement.

4.2 Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance.

4.2.1 General requirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain commercial general and automobile liability insurance for the term of this Agreement in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. If a Commercial General Liability Insurance or an Automobile Liability form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from activities contemplated under this Agreement, including the use of owned and non-owned automobiles.

4.2.2 Minimum scope of coverage. Commercial general coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 (most recent edition) covering comprehensive General Liability on an “occurrence” basis. Automobile coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 (most recent edition), Code 1 (any auto). No endorsement shall be attached limiting the coverage.

4.2.3 Additional requirements. Each of the following shall be included in the insurance coverage or added as a certified endorsement to the policy:
a. The Insurance shall cover on an occurrence or an occurrence basis, and not on a claims-made basis.
52 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 5 of 14
b. City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the Consultant
c. For any claims related to this Agreement or the work hereunder, the Consultant’s insurance covered shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or selfinsurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
d. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party, except after 30 days’ prior written notice has been provided to the City.

4.3 Professional Liability Insurance.

4.3.1 General requirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain for the period covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance for licensed professionals performing work pursuant to this Agreement in an amount not less than $1,000,000 covering the licensed professionals’ errors and omissions. Any deductible or self-insured retention shall not exceed $150,000 per claim.

4.3.2 Claims-made limitations. The following provisions shall apply if the professional liability coverage is written on a claims-made form:
a. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be before the date of the Agreement.
b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five years after completion of the Agreement or the work, so long as commercially available at reasonable rates.
c. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date that precedes the date of this Agreement, Consultant must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five years after completion of work under this Agreement. d. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review prior to the commencement of any work under this Agreement.

4.4 All Policies Requirements.

4.4.1 Acceptability of insurers. All insurance required by this section is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. 53 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 6 of 14

4.4.2 Verification of coverage. Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish City with a complete copy of the certificate of insurance delivered to Consultant by the insurer. Certificates of insurance shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. If the City does not receive the required insurance documents prior to the Consultant beginning work, it shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. If the Certificate of Insurance refers to the policy and it is necessary as a reference, then the City will reserve the right to require complete copies of all required insurance policies at any time.

4.4.3 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Consultant shall disclose to and obtain the written approval of City for the self-insured retentions and deductibles before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, employees, and volunteers; or the Consultant shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

4.4.4 Wasting Policies. No policy required by this Section 4 shall include a “wasting” policy limit (i.e. limit that is eroded by the cost of defense).

4.4.5 Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer or contractor may require from vendor by virtue of the payment of any loss.

Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsements that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation.

The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the entity for all work performed by the consultant, its employees, agents, and subcontractors.

4.4.6 Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

4.5 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option exercise any of the following remedies, which are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not the exclusive remedy for Consultant’s breach:
 Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement;
54 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 7 of 14
 Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment that becomes due to Consultant hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; and/or  Terminate this Agreement.

Section 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND CONSULTANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES.

To the full extent permitted by law, EMC Planning Inc. shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Owner, its governing body, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses and costs (including, without limitation, attorney fees and costs and fees of litigation) (collectively, “Liability”) arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Engineer in the performance of this Agreement, except such Liability caused by the active negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct of Owner. This indemnification obligation is not limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable to or for Engineer or its agents or employees under Workers’ Compensation acts, disability benefits acts, or other employee benefit acts. This indemnification obligation is not limited by any limitation on the amount or type of damages available under any applicable insurance coverage and shall survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement with respect to Liability arising during the term of the Agreement.

The Consultant’s obligation to defend and indemnify shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate Liability or because the Consultant evaluates Liability and determines that the Consultant is not liable to the claimant. The Consultant must respond within 30 days, to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended by the City. If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity within 30 days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, so much of the money due the Consultant under and by virtue of this Agreement as shall reasonably be considered necessary by the City, may be retained by the City until disposition has been made of the claim or suit for damages, or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense, whichever occurs first.

With respect to third party claims against the Consultant, the Consultant waives any and all rights of any type to express or implied indemnity against the Indemnitees.

Notwithstanding the forgoing, to the extent this Agreement is a “construction contract” as defined by California Civil Code Section 2782, as may be amended from time to time, such duties of consultant to indemnify shall not apply when to do so would be prohibited by California Civil Code Section 2782.

In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

Section 6. STATUS OF CONSULTANT.
55 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 8 of 14

6.1 Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and assignment of personnel pursuant to Subparagraph 1.3; however, otherwise City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any and all claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

6.2 Consultant Not an Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.

Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.

Section 7. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.

7.1 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement.

7.2 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all laws applicable to the performance of the work hereunder.

7.3 Other Governmental Regulations. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program.

7.4 Licenses and Permits. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature that are legally required to practice their respective professions. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, any subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required to practice their respective professions. In addition to the foregoing, Consultant and any subcontractors shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement valid Business Licenses from City.

7.5 Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Consultant shall not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontract, or participant in, recipient 56 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 9 of 14
of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Consultant under this Agreement.

Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in employment, contracting, and the provision of any services that are the subject of this Agreement, including but not limited to the satisfaction of any positive obligations required of Consultant thereby.

Consultant shall include the provisions of this Subsection in any subcontract approved by the Contract Administrator or this Agreement.

Section 8. TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION.

8.1 Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon written notification to Consultant.

Consultant may cancel this Agreement upon 60 days’ written notice to City and shall include in such notice the reasons for cancellation.

In the event of termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed to the effective date of termination; City, however, may condition payment of such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City any or all documents, photographs, computer software, video and audio tapes, and other materials provided to Consultant or prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement.

8.2 Extension. City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, extend the end date of this Agreement beyond that provided for in Subsection 1.1. Any such extension shall require a written amendment to this Agreement, as provided for herein. Consultant understands and agrees that, if City grants such an extension, City shall have no obligation to provide Consultant with compensation beyond the maximum amount provided for in this Agreement.

Similarly, unless authorized by the Contract Administrator, City shall have no obligation to reimburse Consultant for any otherwise reimbursable expenses incurred during the extension period.

8.3 Amendments. The parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed by all the parties.

8.4 Assignment and Subcontracting. City and Consultant recognize and agree that this Agreement contemplates personal performance by Consultant and is based upon a determination of Consultant’s unique personal competence, experience, and specialized personal knowledge. Moreover, a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was and is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant.

Consultant may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the subcontractors noted in the proposal, without prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. 57 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 10 of 14

8.5 Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Consultant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

8.6 Options upon Breach by Consultant. If Consultant materially breaches any of the terms of this Agreement, City’s remedies shall included, but not be limited to, the following:

8.6.1 Immediately terminate the Agreement;

8.6.2 Retain the plans, specifications, drawings, reports, design documents, and any other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement;

8.6.3 Retain a different consultant to complete the work described in a given task order not finished by Consultant; or

8.6.4 Charge Consultant the difference between the cost to complete the work described in a given task order that is unfinished at the time of breach and the amount that City would have paid Consultant pursuant to Section 2 if Consultant had completed the work.

Section 9. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS.

9.1 Records Created as Part of Consultant’s Performance. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications, records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that Consultant prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to the matters covered hereunder shall be the property of the City. Consultant hereby agrees to deliver those documents to the City upon termination of the Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the documents and other materials, including but not limited to those described above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specifically for the City and are not necessarily suitable for any future or other use. City and Consultant agree that, until final approval by City, all data, plans, specifications, reports and other documents are confidential and will not be released to third parties without prior written consent of both parties.

9.2 Consultant’s Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services or expenditures and disbursements charged to the City under this Agreement for a minimum of 3 years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to the Consultant to this Agreement.

9.3 Inspection and Audit of Records. Any records or documents that Section 9.2 of this Agreement requires Consultant to maintain shall be made available for inspection, audit, and/or copying at any time during regular business hours, upon oral or written request of the City. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds $10,000.00, the Agreement shall be subject to the 58 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 11 of 14
examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of 3 years after final payment under the Agreement.

Section 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

10.1 Attorneys’ Fees. If a party to this Agreement brings any action, including an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.

10.2 Venue. In the event that either party brings any action against the other under this Agreement, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of Monterey or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

10.3 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.

10.4 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term of this Agreement.

10.5 Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the parties.

10.6 Use of Recycled Products. Consultant shall prepare and submit all reports, written studies and other printed material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or less cost than virgin paper.

10.7 Conflict of Interest. Consultant may serve other clients, but none whose activities within the corporate limits of City or whose business, regardless of location, would place Consultant in a “conflict of interest,” as that term is defined in the Political Reform Act, codified at California Government Code Section 81000 et seq.

Consultant shall not employ any City official in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq.

Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous 12 months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City. If Consultant was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City in the previous twelve months, Consultant warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. Consultant understands 59 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 12 of 14
that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code § 1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this Agreement, including reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to reimburse the City for any sums paid to the Consultant.

Consultant understands that, in addition to the foregoing, it may be subject to criminal prosecution for a violation of Government Code § 1090 and, if applicable, will be disqualified from holding public office in the State of California.

10.8 Solicitation. Consultant agrees not to solicit business at any meeting, focus group, or interview related to this Agreement, either orally or through any written materials.

10.9 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by Community and Economic Development Department ("Contract Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract Administrator or his or her designee.

10.10 Notices. Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to:

EMC Planning Group Inc.

Attn: Michael Groves
601 Abrego St
Monterey, CA 93940
Any written notice to City shall be sent to:

City of Soledad
Community & Economic Development Director
248 Main Street
Soledad, CA 93960

10.11 Professional Seal. Where applicable in the determination of the contract administrator, the first page of a technical report, first page of design specifications, and each page of construction drawings shall be stamped/sealed and signed by the licensed professional responsible for the report/design preparation. The stamp/seal shall be in a block entitled "Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility," as in the following example.
_________________________________________
Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with
report/design responsibility.

10.12 Integration. This Agreement, including the scope of work attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral.
60 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 13 of 14

10.13 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
61 Consulting Services Agreement between City of Soledad and CC Reso No. ____ Date____ EMC Planning Group Inc. Page 14 of 14
The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

CITY OF SOLEDAD EMC Planning Group Inc.
____________________________ ______________________________ Megan Hunter, City Manager Michael Groves, Senior Principal Attest:
____________________________
Megan Hunter, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
____________________________
Michael Rodriquez, City Attorney
62 Revised Proposal
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
May 7, 2025
Prepared by
EMC Planning Group
63 This document was produced on recycled paper.

REVISED PROPOSAL

SOLEDAD RENEWABLE OASIS TRUCK STOP

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

PREPARED FOR
City of Soledad
Ariana Mora, Senior Planner
248 Main Street
Soledad, CA 93960
Tel 831.223.5020
[email protected]

PREPARED BY
EMC Planning Group Inc.
601 Abrego Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Tel 831.649.1799
Fax 831.649.8399
Teri Wissler Adam, Senior Principal
[email protected]
www.emcplanning.com
May 7, 2025
64 Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ..................................................... 1-1

1.1 Location and Existing Conditions ............................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Previously-Proposed Project ........................................................................................ 1-1

1.3 Project Overview ............................................................................................................ 1-1

1.4 Site Plan Features ........................................................................................................... 1-1

1.5 Existing Documentation ............................................................................................... 1-2

1.6 Employment ................................................................................................................... 1-2

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................................................................. 2-1 Task 1 Project Management/Consultation ..................................................................... 2-1 Task 2 Research and Development ................................................................................. 2-1 Task 3 Administrative Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ............. 2-1 Task 4 Screencheck Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration .................. 2-8 Task 5 Public Review Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ......................... 2-8 Task 6 Response to Comments ........................................................................................ 2-8 Task 7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ................................................ 2-8 Task 8 Public Hearing ........................................................................................................ 2-8 Assumptions ............................................................................................................................ 2-8

3.0 SCHEDULE AND BUDGET ................................................................................................ 3-1

3.1 Schedule ........................................................................................................................... 3-1

3.2 Budget .............................................................................................................................. 3-1 Attachments
Attachment A Air Quality Modeling and Health Risk Assessment Scope of Work (Illingworth & Rodkin)
Attachment B VMT Evaluation and Traffic Operations Analysis Scope of Work (Hexagon) Attachment C Environmental Noise Assessment Scope of Work (WJV Acoustics) 65 Section 1.0 Introduction and Understanding 1-1 EMC Planning Group Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025

1.0 Introduction and Project Understanding

1.1 Location and Existing Conditions
1850 Properties proposes to develop approximate 19.33-acre parcel located at 701 Nestles Road (APN 022-224-005). The project site is largely vacant and unimproved, with the exception of three agricultural-industrial buildings, according to the project plans and GoogleEarth 2023 aerial photography (former Sequoia Lumber Company). The project site is surrounded by development, with limited undeveloped land to the northeast and southeast.

The Project focuses on highway and industrial oriented businesses and uses which will cater to travelers in cars, recreational vehicles, busses, and trucks.

1.2 Previously-Proposed Project
In 2017, the City of Soledad contracted with EMC Planning Group to assist the City with application processing and environmental review for a proposed event center (aka Massa Event Center, High Peaks Event Center, Swap Meet/Flea Market Facility) at the project site. The applicant pulled their application prior to completion of the initial study.

1.3 Project Overview
The project overview and site plan features were developed using the PDF titled “Project Description September 2024.”
The Soledad Renewable Oasis project will redevelop approximately 19.33 acres of unimproved land located at 701 Nestles Road. The project is divided into two primary parcels:
 Parcel A (Truck Stop): 16.81 acres
 Parcel B (Hydrogen Refueling): 2.52 acres.

This facility will serve long-haul truckers, local traffic, and passengers along Highway 101 with a comprehensive set of services, including refueling, maintenance, dining, and rest areas. The development will incorporate both traditional and renewable energy elements, aiming to create a sustainable and future-forward travel plaza.

1.4 Site Plan Features

1. Fueling Stations and Hydrogen Refueling. These facilities will cater to traditional fuel needs while incorporating future-ready hydrogen refueling for trucks and vehicles.  Hydrogen Dispensers: four (4) heavy-duty hydrogen dispensers and four (4) retail hydrogen dispensers.
66 Section 1.0 Introduction and Understanding 1-2 EMC Planning Group Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025  Diesel Dispensers: seven (7) diesel fuel dispensers strategically placed for efficient refueling.

2. Convenience Store and Quick-Serve Restaurant. The site includes a 15,500-square-foot convenience store combined with a 2,400-square-foot quick-serve restaurant (QSR), designed to serve both local customers and travelers. The store will provide essential goods and a variety of dining options.

3. Truck Maintenance and Wash Facility. A 16,870-square-foot, six (6)-bay truck maintenance facility will be constructed to offer services such as minor repairs and a truck wash bay, which will utilize reclaimed water.

4. Parking and Rest Area. The development provides parking for both trucks and passenger vehicles. Parking spaces for trucks with trailers, alongside hydrogen and diesel dispensers, will ensure ample and efficient service capacity. Truckers can utilize these areas for rest during their mandated breaks.

5. Pylon Signage. A Freeway Pylon Sign (approximately 85 feet) will be installed for visibility from the highway, advertising the facility's offerings and aiding in the navigation for trucks and vehicles.

6. Renewable Energy Integration. Solar panels installed at strategic locations across the site will provide renewable energy for both vehicle charging stations and operational needs, ensuring a sustainable energy supply.

1.5 Existing Documentation
The following documentation has been provided either by the applicant, or is in the files of EMC Planning Group associated with the Soledad Event Center Project.

Proposed Project
 Terrestrial Site Summary (PMA Research Labs 2024);
 Preliminary Site Plan (PMA Research Labs, Sheet Number C-100 undated);  Existing Conditions Demolition Plan (PMA Research Labs, Sheet C-200 undated)  Landscape Plan (PMA Research Labs, Sheet Number C-700 undated); Soledad Event Center Project
 Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. March 9, 2015);  Limited Phase II Site Assessment Report (Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. August 11, 2015);  Soil Investigation Report (Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. October 14, 2015)

1.6 Employment
The project is expected to generate more than 100 new jobs, including positions related to truck maintenance, food service, fuel station attendants, and more. 67 Section 2.0 Scope of Work 2-1 EMC Planning Group
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025

2.0 Scope of Work
The City has indicated that it will require CEQA documentation for the proposed project and that it expects that an initial study/mitigated negative declaration (IS/MND) will suffice as that documentation. If it is determined that the potential for significant impacts exist, an environmental impact report would be required. If so, an amendment to the proposed scope of work and budget would be required. EMC Planning Group will also prepare response to public comments and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP).

The proposed tasks are presented below.

Task 1 Project Management/Consultation
This task includes coordinating staff, general management and administration, contract management and invoicing, and consulting with City staff on CEQA issues.

Task 2 Research and Development
This task includes a thorough review of the application materials and plans as well as any other documents applicable to the proposed project.

The scope of work assumes that City staff will conduct tribal consultation and will provide a summary of the consultation process to be included in the initial study.

Task 3 Administrative Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
EMC Planning Group will prepare the administrative draft IS/MND and provide one (1) electronic version to City staff for review and comment. EMC Planning Group will also prepare the draft MND and submit one (1) electronic version for review and comment by City staff. The initial study will address all of the topics in the initial study checklist, but is expected to focus on the following topics:

Task 3.1 Biological Resource Analysis
Based on a preliminary review of aerial photographs, the proposed project may impact abandoned industrial buildings, disked fallow agricultural land, and annual grassland. According to the California Natural Diversity Database (California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2025), there are a number of special-status species with the potential to occur within the project area, including:
 Monterey spineflower (Chorizanthe pungens var. pungens); 68 Section 2.0 Scope of Work 2-2 EMC Planning Group
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025  Crotch's bumble bee (Bombus crotchii);
 Western spadefoot (Spea hammondii);
 Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor);
 American badger (Taxidea taxus);
 Townsend's big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii);
 San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica); and
 Protected nesting birds and raptors.

This evaluation will assess potential habitat present for special-status species in the area and recommend mitigation measures for the protection of biological resources. If suitable habitat is identified, recommendations may also include the need for additional specific or protocol-level surveys to be conducted during an appropriate time of year.

The following subtasks include reviewing biological databases, preliminary site plans and relevant reports, and conducting a reconnaissance-level biological survey. Results of research and the site survey will be reported in the biological resources section of the initial study.

Research
Compile and review available project information, including preliminary site plans and aerial photographs. Conduct a review to determine the special-status species that have been recorded as occurring within the general project vicinity based on current database searches of California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s California Natural Diversity Database, the California Native Plant Society Rare and Endangered Plant Inventory, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Information for Planning and Consultation database, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory; and other biological studies conducted in the vicinity of the project site, if available.

Reconnaissance-level Field Survey
Complete a reconnaissance-level field survey to: (1) identify and map the principal plant communities; (2) assess the potential for special-status species and their habitats, wildlife movement corridors, potentially jurisdictional wetlands and waterways, regulated trees, and other significant biological resources to occur; and (3) identify and map any observed locations of special-status species and/or habitats. Plant and wildlife species observed during the survey will be recorded in field notes. Any special-status species observed will be reported to the California Natural Diversity Database in compliance with California Department of Fish and Wildlife permit requirements, after the information is provided to the client.

Initial Study Section
Prepare the biological resources section of the initial study, describing existing habitats and plant and animal species found on the project site, and the occurrence of and/or potential for special-status species and their habitats. If needed, one or more figures will be prepared to illustrate habitat types 69 Section 2.0 Scope of Work 2-3 EMC Planning Group
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025 and the location(s) of special-status species occurring on or in the vicinity of the project site.

Potential impacts to biological resources will be identified, and mitigation measures will be provided to minimize potential impacts when possible.

Note: Focused surveys for specific plant and/or animal species are not included in this proposed scope of work. The presence or absence of certain species can be determined during the reconnaissance-level site assessment. If appropriate habitat for other sensitive species is observed during the site assessment, species-specific surveys may be required (i.e., surveys for annual plants not in bloom at the time of the reconnaissance-level survey, protocol-level surveys for special-status wildlife species, etc.).

Task 3.2 Cultural Analysis (Historic Archaeological and Unique Archaeological Resources)
Archival Research
This task includes a review of available background research including site plans, maps, and aerial photographs of the parcel. Also included is an archival search of the database of the California Historical Resources Information System, affiliated with the California Office of Historic Preservation, and a Sacred Lands search with the Native American Heritage Commission, to determine if any known archaeological, historical, Sacred Sites, or Tribal Cultural Resources are recorded on or within a quarter mile of the project boundary.

Pedestrian Survey
This task involves conducting a reconnaissance-level archaeological pedestrian survey of the project area, including the areas considered for the new buildings, other amenities, and overall site improvements. The purpose of the reconnaissance survey is to determine if surface indicators of historic or prehistoric archaeological resources are present. The presence of surface materials, could indicate additional subsurface prehistoric or historic archaeological resources. This budget assumes that no significant cultural material will be encountered. If significant material culture is encountered, a new scope and budget may be required in order to properly assess the finds.

Task 3.3 Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Energy Analyses This analysis consists of emissions modeling, evaluation of air quality impacts using the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (“air district”) guidelines, greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) analysis using currently-accepted industry methodologies, and an evaluation of energy impacts. Illingworth & Rodkin would be assisting EMC Planning Group with this effort. Their detailed scope of work, which includes modeling and a health risk assessment, is included in Attachment A.

Air Quality
The proposed project is located in the North Central Coast Air Basin (air basin), which falls under the authority of the air district. Therefore, the analysis will reference the air district’s 2008 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, as well as other relevant CEQA documents. The air district provides project level thresholds of significance that can be used to evaluate the potential significance of individual 70 Section 2.0 Scope of Work 2-4 EMC Planning Group
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025 project impacts. Criteria air emissions and GHG emissions modeling using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) will be conducted by Illingworth & Rodkin. Baseline condition air emissions volumes will also be modeled and reductions in air emission volumes from incorporating solar power generation into the project design will be calculated. Net air emissions volumes will be compared to the air district thresholds of significance.

As also outlined in its scope of work, Illingworth and Rodkin will prepare construction and operational health risk assessments. Construction activities will produce toxic air contaminants, primarily from diesel powered construction equipment. Toxic air contaminants will also be produced during project operations, primarily from fugitive fueling activities, and truck movements and idling. At high enough concentrations over periods of time, these emissions have potential to adversely affect the health of sensitive receptors (residents located to the east of the site) and potentially workers in nearby commercial and industrial businesses. In many air districts, truck stop projects commonly are considered potentially significant sources of toxic air contaminants. While the air district does not provide specific guidance on health risks for such uses, it would be prudent to include these analyses due to the scrutiny a project of this type and size may undergo.

The following tasks will be undertaken:
 Briefly describe the physical and climatological characteristics of the air basin, existing air pollutant conditions, and health effects of air pollutants;  Review current air district documents, policies, and regulatory requirements applicable to the proposed project;
 Utilize the CalEEMod results and off model quantification of emissions offsets from on-site renewable energy to quantify the net change in criteria air pollutant emissions and compare the findings to the air district’s thresholds of significance to assess whether the proposed project would result in significant impacts from criteria air pollutant emissions;  Review the results of the health risk assessment conducted by Illingworth & Rodkin (scope of work presented further below) and describe project sources of hazardous air pollutants, their associated health risks, and existing or planned nearby sensitive receptors that could be impacted, and identify significant impacts; and
 If necessary, identify mitigation measures to reduce criteria air emission and/or health risk impact significance.

It should be noted that use of hydrogen as a transportation fuel, particularly as a replacement for diesel-powered trucks, has potential to reduce criteria air emissions from mobile sources. However, commercialization and use of hydrogen for this purpose is in its very early stages. Therefore, it may be speculative to assume that this component of the project will result in measurable fuel substitution that can be defended as a source of reduced criteria air emissions or GHG emissions. 71 Section 2.0 Scope of Work 2-5 EMC Planning Group
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025 Construction Health Risk Assessment
The proposed project would be constructed near existing receptors (i.e., employees working and residences living nearby). Therefore, a construction health risk assessment is proposed. This would involve dispersion modeling. Emissions obtained from CalEEMod would be used to develop construction period emission rates based on project-specific information. Dispersion modeling would be conducted using EPA’s AERMOD model and hourly meteorological data from the most representative meteorological station, where data is provided. The construction dispersion modeling would assume all of the construction happens at the same time. Cancer risks will be calculated using the modeled construction-period diesel particulate matter concentrations following the air district risk management policy guidance. The risks would then be compared against air district’s CEQA thresholds (i.e., cancer risk and non-cancer hazards). Measures that may be necessary to reduce construction exhaust emissions or cancer risks would be identified.

Operational Health Risk Assessment
The proposed project would be operating near existing businesses and single-family homes (i.e., sensitive receptors) about 100 to 1,000 feet from the project, depending on the development plans.

For these reasons, a health risk assessment should be conducted for the project that includes toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions associated with project operations (i.e., emissions from diesel trucks, gasoline vehicles, delivery trucks, and fuel pumps/tanks). The refined health risk assessment would be performed that includes both emissions and dispersion modeling using the EMFAC2021 emission factor model and the AERMOD dispersion model. TAC emissions would be estimated based on project-specific information provided by the project applicant and the project’s traffic study. Dispersion modeling would then be conducted using EPA’s AERMOD model and hourly meteorological data available from the most representative meteorological station. Cancer risks and non-cancer risks will be calculated using the modeled pollutant concentrations following the air district’s risk management policy guidance. The risks would then be compared against air district’s CEQA thresholds (i.e., cancer risk and non-cancer hazards). Measures that may be necessary to reduce construction exhaust emissions or cancer risks would be identified.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The proposed project will generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during both construction and operations. During construction, emissions will result from off-road sources (e.g., heavy equipment, trucks, and other machinery) and on-road sources (e.g., haul trucks and worker vehicles). During operations, mobile source, building energy source, and area source emissions will be generated.

The GHG impacts of a project can be found to be less than significant if the project is consistent with a qualified plan for reducing GHG emissions. However, neither the City nor the air district have developed detailed guidance or plans for assessing the GHG impacts of new land use projects.

In such circumstances, the City may reference the guidance developed by other agencies, provided that guidance is supported by substantial evidence. Guidance developed by the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District in its 2023 CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds & Guidance for the San Luis 72 Section 2.0 Scope of Work 2-6 EMC Planning Group
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025 Obispo County Air Pollution Control District would be used for this purpose. This approach has precedent for the City as it is being used in the CEQA documentation for the Almond Acres project being prepared by EMC Planning Group. The guidance includes an absolute (“bright line”) quantified threshold of significance, and a GHG efficiency-based quantified threshold of significance. Net GHG emissions volumes quantified through CalEEMod modeling and out-ofmodel calculations related to GHG off-sets from proposed renewable energy sources, will be evaluated against the selected threshold of significance.

The GHG analysis will include the following tasks:
 Briefly summarize the existing climate change setting at the global, state and local levels;  Briefly summarize the existing climate change policy and regulatory setting, including review of state and local legislation and regulations;
 Quantify baseline GHG emissions and the GHG emissions offset resulting from the application of solar generated power;
 Briefly summarize San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District GHG thresholds guidance and determine the appropriate threshold to use in the analysis;  Compare net GHG emissions volume to the applicable threshold to determine if the proposed project would result in a significant impact; and  Propose mitigation measures, if necessary, to reduce significant impacts and conduct another model run to determine whether mitigations, if required, reduce impacts to less than significant.

Energy
Energy will be required for both the construction and operation of the project. During construction, fuel will be consumed by vehicles and machinery traveling to and from the site, as well as for equipment used in the building process. During operations, electricity will be needed for hydrogen production, lighting, HVAC systems, and other building functions.

The thresholds of significance for energy impacts are qualitative. Consequently, potential impacts will be discussed qualitatively. The proposed project will be required to comply with uniformly applied regulations and potentially to reduce criteria air emissions and/or GHG emission via measures that also reduce energy demand; applicable regulations and air quality and GHG reduction measures will be discussed to identify how energy demand will be moderated. The project potential to result in wasteful or inefficient energy use will be evaluated in the context of these variables, whether the proposed development type (and its energy demand) can be characterized as unnecessary or wasteful.
73 Section 2.0 Scope of Work 2-7 EMC Planning Group
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025 Energy demand for the proposed project will be calculated and reported based on the CalEEMod results provided by Illingworth & Rodkin. Vehicle miles traveled taken from the same CalEEMod results will serve as an input for estimating the volume transportation fuel consumption using the Emissions Factor Model. Energy demand offset from on-site renewable energy will also be accounted for.

The following tasks will be completed:
 Report energy demand from on-site use of natural gas and electricity based on the CalEEMod results;
 Identify transportation fuel demand based on Emissions Factors model results;  Identify current regulatory requirements that would reduce energy demand;  Identify energy demand reduction measures being proposed by the project applicant and on-site energy generation plans;
 Describe energy demand reduction that would occur with implementing air quality and/or GHG mitigation measures, if any;
 Identify the significance of energy impacts; and
 Present mitigation measures to reduce energy consumption, if necessary.

Task 3.4 Transportation/VMT Analysis (Hexagon)
Hexagon Transportation Consultants will conduct a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) screening for the proposed project. Per OPR’s recommendations, retail uses of less than 50,000 s.f., can be considered local serving and be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT. However, given that the project site will be located adjacent to a regional highway facility and will cater to regional travelers it may not be considered “local-serving.” Rather, it would be expected that the majority of trips generated by the proposed site uses would primarily consist of vehicles already traveling along the adjacent US 101 highway. This will be qualitatively discussed in the report.

Hexagon will also conduct a traffic operations analysis to evaluate the effects of the proposed project on key intersection in the vicinity of the project area. Finally, Hexagon will conduct a signal and stop sign warrant analysis, evaluate the project’s effect on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities, and evaluate site access, on-site circulation, and parking. Hexagon’s detailed scope of work is provided in Attachment B.

Task 3.5 Environmental Noise Assessment (WJV Acoustics) WJV Acoustics will conduct a site inspection to evaluate the acoustical characteristics of the project site and surrounding area, analyze potential project-related changes in roadway traffic noise exposure along roadways near or adjacent to the project site, evaluate potential noise impacts from the project as they may affect existing noise-sensitive uses in the project area, quantify noise and vibration levels that would likely occur during construction of the project as they could affect nearby existing or planned noise-sensitive receptors, and prepare recommendations for noise mitigation as may be 74 Section 2.0 Scope of Work 2-8 EMC Planning Group
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Proposal May 7, 2025 required to reduce significant noise impacts. WJV Acoustics’ detailed scope of work is provided in Attachment C.

Task 4 Screencheck Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration EMC Planning Group will revise the administrative draft IS/MND and submit one (1) electronic screencheck version of the IS/MND for review and comment by City staff.

Task 5 Public Review Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The screencheck IS/MND will be revised and a public review IS/MND will be prepared - one (1) electronic copy will be delivered for distribution by the City.

Task 6 Response to Comments
EMC Planning Group will prepare responses to public comments received on the MND and provide one (1) draft electronic copy of the response to comments for review and comment and one (1) final electronic copy, with comments incorporated. The budget assumes that no more than 10 hours would be required to respond to comments.

Task 7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
EMC Planning Group will prepare a draft MMRP. EMC Planning Group will incorporate City staff comments into a final mitigation monitoring and reporting program.

Task 8 Public Hearing
The EMC Planning Group project manager will virtually attend one public hearing to answer questions on the environmental analysis and documentation.

Assumptions
It is assumed that City staff will:
 Conduct tribal consultation;
 Prepare, distribute, post, and file all applicable noticing;  Print and circulate the public review IS/MND;
 Post the IS/MND with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse; and  Present the project at public hearing(s).

Any one or more of the noted tasks can be added to this scope of work at the request of the City. 75 Section 3.0 Schedule and Budget 3-1 EMC Planning Group Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop CEQA Services Proposal May 7, 2025

3.0 Schedule and Budget

3.1 Schedule
A preliminary schedule is shown below.

Task Number
Of Weeks
Cumulative
Number of Weeks
Research/ Development, Technical Analysis (Transportation, Noise, Air Quality, GHG, Energy, Biological and Cultural Resources)
8 8
Administrative Draft Initial Study/MND 2 10
City Staff Review 2 12
Screen Check Draft Initial Study/MND 2 14
City Staff Review 1 15
Public Review Initial Study/MND 1 16
30-day Public Review Period (including City’s preparation of noticing) 5 21 Draft Response to Comments and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4 25 City Staff Review and Final Response to Comments and MMRP 1 26 Total 26

3.2 Budget
The project budget is shown on the following page.
76 Task
Staff Senior Principal Senior Planner Lutz (PM) Senior Planner (Mortensen) Associate Planner Reg. Prof. Archaeologist Principal Biologist Associate Biologist Graphics Production Manager Admin./ Production Billing Rate (Per Hour) $295.00 $225.00 $225.00 $195.00 $145.00 $245.00 $185.00 $150.00 $165.00 $125.001. Project Management 4.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 17.0 $3,805.002. Research & Development 1.0 4.0 0.0 8.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 $3,485.003. Administrative Draft IS/MND 12.0 10.0 37.0 32.0 22.0 3.0 28.0 12.0 4.0 1.0 161.0 $32,045.004. Screencheck Draft IS/MND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 $630.005. Public Review IS/MND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 $330.006. Response to Comments 1.0 4.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 $2,170.007. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 0.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 $1,005.008. Public Hearing (Virtual Attendance) 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 $1,800.00Subtotal (Hours) 18.0 37.0 37.0 49.0 26.0 3.0 28.0 15.0 8.0 4.0 Total Hours Total CostSubtotal (Cost) $5,310.00 $8,325.00 $8,325.00 $9,555.00 $3,770.00 $735.00 $5,180.00 $2,250.00 $1,320.00 $500.00 225.0 $45,270.00 Additional Costs
Production/Printing CostsTravel Costs (2 trips - 180 miles x 0.70)Postal/Deliverables (CNDDB and CCIC)MiscellaneousAdministrative Overhead 15%Total Subconsultant Fees
Illingworth & Rodkin (Air Quality Modeling and Health Risk Assessment)Hexagon (Transportation and VMT Analysis)WJV Acoustics (Environmental Noise Assessment)Subconsultant Overhead 15%Total Total Costs
NOTE: This proposal is valid for 90 days
Soledad Renewable Oasis Truck Stop IS/MND Budget
EMC Planning Group Inc.

Total Cost Total Hours
$50.00
$834.90$108.90
$50.00
$126.00$500.00
$20,800.00$33,500.00
$115,277.40
$5,850.00$9,022.50
$69,172.50
77 Air Quality Modeling and Health Risk Assessment
Scope of Work (Illingworth & Rodkin) A

ATTACHMENT
78 429 East Cotati Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931
Tel: 707-794-0400 Fax: 707-794-0405
www.illingworthrodkin.com [email protected]
March 25, 2025
Teri Wissler Adam
EMC Planning Group
601 Abrego Street
Monterey, CA 93940
VIA E-Mail: Teri Wissler Adam [email protected]
SUBJECT: Soledad Renewable Oasis in Soledad, CA
Proposal to Prepare an Air Quality Analysis
Dear Teri:

Thank you for inviting Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. (I&R) to submit this proposal to conduct an air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis for a development proposed in Soledad, California. We understand that the project proposes redeveloping an approximate 20-acre site with highway and industrial oriented businesses. This would include a truck service center with highway commercial uses and renewable energy generation and storage. The truck service center would dispense gasoline, diesel and renewable fuels. Truck parking would be provided throughout much of the site.

We understand that EMC is anticipating that I&R would provide the technical information to support the air quality analysis that they would prepare. Based on our review of information received and our experience with similar projects in the vicinity, we offer the following scope of work and fee estimate.

Scope of Work – Air Quality
Typically, air districts that have influence over the scope of analyses under CEQA recommend an emissions analysis related to both project construction and operation. The analysis should estimate emissions from operating the fueling islands, idling trucks, and any sources associated with commercial and energy generation. Note that the project, considered a gasoline dispensing facility (GDF), would be required to obtain a permit to construct and operate from the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD). The following tasks would be conducted to assess the project’s air quality/GHG impacts:

1. Evaluate Construction Activities. Construction air quality impacts resulting from the proposed project would be addressed by predicting construction period emissions (ROG, NOx, and PM). Emissions obtained from the district-approved version of the California Emissions Estimator Model Version (CalEEMod) would be used to develop construction 79 Teri Wissler Adam
March 25, 2025 - Page 2
period emission rates based on project-specific information provided by the applicant. The CalEEMod model also provides GHG emissions.

2. Evaluate Operational Activities. Emissions of criteria pollutant (ROG, NOx, and PM) emissions would be computed for the proposed project using the CalEEMod model recommended by MBARD. Default inputs for the District would be used unless projectspecific data are available. Project daily trip generation rates that include breakdown by vehicle types and project travel distances would be needed from the project traffic consultant. Methods recommended by MBARD or other districts to compute emissions from gasoline dispensing facilities would be applied to this project. In addition, the contribution of project traffic and delivery truck traffic would be included in this analysis.

This would involve emissions calculations using CARB/MBARD guidance. The CalEEMod model also provides GHG emissions. The offset of GHG emissions from solar power generation/hydrogen production would also be calculated based on the statewide emission rates for electricity production and diesel usage (compared to equivalent hydrogen usage).

3. Health Risk Assessment. The project would include sources of toxic air contaminants (TACs), some of which are regulated by MBARD. Primary emissions are diesel particulate matter from construction equipment and truck traffic and benzene from gasoline dispensing facilities. While most TAC sources associated with the project would be several hundred feet or further from sensitive receptors, there is a truck parking area and maintenance facility planned in close proximity to sensitive receptors that warrants preparing a health risk assessment. This assessment would evaluate TAC emissions from both construction and operations to predict the increase in lifetime cancer risk and both acute and chronic risks from hazardous air pollutant exposure.
o Construction Health Risk Impacts. The proposed project would be constructed near existing receptors (i.e., employees working and residences living nearby).

Therefore, a construction health risk assessment is proposed. This would involve dispersion modeling. Emissions obtained from CalEEMod (Task 1 above) would be used to develop construction period emission rates based on project-specific information. Dispersion modeling would be conducted using EPA’s AERMOD model and hourly meteorological data from the most representative meteorological station, where data is provided. The construction dispersion modeling would assume all of the construction happens at the same time. Cancer risks will be calculated using the modeled construction-period diesel particulate matter concentrations following the MBARD risk management policy guidance. The risks would then be compared against MBARD’s CEQA thresholds (i.e., cancer risk and non-cancer hazards). Measures that may be necessary to reduce construction exhaust emissions or cancer risks would be identified.
o Operational Health Risk Impacts. The health risk assessment for project operations would address those emissions from diesel trucks, gasoline vehicles, delivery trucks, and fuel pumps/tanks. The health risk assessment would be performed that includes both emissions and dispersion modeling using the EMFAC2021 emission 80 Teri Wissler Adam
March 25, 2025 - Page 3
factor model and the AERMOD dispersion model. TAC emissions would be estimated based on project-specific information provided by the project applicant and the project’s traffic study. Dispersion modeling would then be conducted using EPA’s AERMOD model and hourly meteorological data available from the most representative meteorological station. Cancer risks and non-cancer risks will be calculated using modeled pollutant concentrations following the MBARD risk management policy guidance and then compared against MBARD’s CEQA thresholds (i.e., cancer risk and non-cancer hazards). Health risks from the gasoline dispensing facility would be based on screening modeling using the California Air Resources Board GDF Screening tool along with projected gasoline throughput for the project. The production of hydrogen using electricity is not anticipated to generate any TAC emissions. Measures that may be necessary to reduce emissions or cancer risks would be identified.

Deliverables and Schedule
The results of the analyses will be submitted in an I&R technical memo. The memo would include appropriate tables, graphics, results, and information regarding any proposed mitigation measures.

We estimate that we can complete this analysis within five weeks of receiving all necessary data needed to complete the analyses (plans, traffic data, gasoline throughput, etc..).

Budget Estimate
I&R’s fee to prepare this work is outlined in the table below. Work not included in this cost estimate, such as our attendance at meetings or hearings or responses to public comments would be billed in addition at our standard rates plus travel expenses. Attachment A lists I&R’s hourly billing rates and insurance coverage.

Task Cost
Air Pollutant Emissions Assessment $7,500
HRA $13,300
Total $20,800
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We look forward to working with you on this project.

Sincerely,
James A. Reyff
Principal
ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC.

Attachment A: Hourly Billing Rates and Insurance Coverage 81 Teri Wissler Adam
March 25, 2025 - Page 4
429 East Cotati Avenue
Cotati, CA 94931
Tel: 707-794-0400 Fax: 707-794-0405
www.illingworthrodkin.com [email protected]
ATTACHMENT A: 2025 HOURLY BILLING RATES
Our fees are based on the following schedule of hourly rates:

Principal $250/hour
Senior Consultant $225/hour
Consultant $210/hour
Staff Consultant $195/hour
Technical/Admin Support $140/hour
Rates are subject to change on an annual basis. Document reproduction and shipping at cost. Mileage at IRS allowable rate; currently $0.70.

INSURANCE COVERAGE
GENERAL LIABILITY in the amount of $2,000,000 per occurrence/ $4,000,000 aggregate.

WORKERS COMPENSATION covering our own employees in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence.

AUTO (OWNED & NON OWNED) covering personal injury or death and property damage in the amount of $1,000,000 per claim.

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY in the amount of $2,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 annual aggregate.

Limitation of Liability. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. requests that the Client agrees to limit Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc.’s liability for Client damages to the sum of $250,000 or our fee, whichever is greater. This limitation shall apply regardless of the cause or legal theory asserted.

UMBRELLA LIABILITY in the amount of $2,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate.

Certificates of insurance will be issued upon request.

INVOICING AND PAYMENTS
I&R submits monthly progress billing invoices by the 15th of each month, for the prior month’s services.

Invoices are submitted directly via email in pdf format, to the email address provided by the client. Special invoicing requirements may result in administrative costs, billed at a rate of $125/hour, in addition to the proposed budget.

I&R accepts payment in the form of cash, paper check, or credit card. I&R does not accept ACH/Electronic payments, or any other form of payment via 3rd party vendors or client portals. 82 VMT Evaluation and Traffic Operations Analysis
Scope of Work (Hexagon) B

ATTACHMENT
83 April 15, 2025
Mr. Ron Sissem
EMC Planning
601 Abrego Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Subject: Proposal to Prepare a VMT Evaluation and Traffic Operations Analysis for the Proposed Soledad Renewable Oasis Development
Mr. Sissem:

Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) evaluation and traffic operations analysis for the proposed Renewable Oasis (Truck Stop) development project located at 701 Nestles Road in Soledad, California (APN 022-224-005). The project as proposed would include gasoline, diesel, and hydrogen fueling pumps for both passenger vehicles and trucks, a convenience store, quick -serve restaurant, truck maintenance and wash facility, rest area and truck parking areas. Access to the project site is proposed via four driveways along Nestles Road.

The following scope of services was developed by Hexagon staff based on our understanding of the project and requirements of the City of Soledad. The scope must be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to our commencement of the study. The Scope of Services provided below is therefore subject to change. Should the City require any material changes in the scope, Hexagon will notify you.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Historically, traffic impact analysis has focused on the identification of traffic impacts and potential roadway improvements based on delay to relieve traffic congestion that may result due to proposed/planned growth.

However, with the adoption of Senate Bill (SB) 743 legislation, public agencies are required (effective July 2020) to base transportation impacts on VMT rather than level of service that typically uses delay as its metric. The change in measurement is intended to better evaluate the effects on the state’s goals for climate change and multi-modal transportation.

Therefore, an evaluation of the project’s effect on VMT must be completed along with a supplemental traffic operations analysis. Peak hour intersection level of service analysis will be completed at a limited number of intersections as part of the traffic operations analysis. However, the determination of project impacts per CEQA requirements will be based solely on VMT metrics.

VMT Evaluation
CEQA guidelines require an evaluation of potential impacts related to adopted VMT methodologies and impact criteria. Since the City of Soledad has yet to adopt VMT impact criteria or thresholds, the VMT evaluation will consider the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines and recommendations for the evaluation of VMT for CEQA.

Per OPR’s recommendations, retail uses of less than 50,000 s.f., can be considered local serving and be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT. However, given that the project site will be located adjacent to a regional highway facility and will cater to regional travelers it may not be considered “localserving.” Rather, it would be expected that the majority of trips generated by the proposed site uses would primarily consist of vehicles already traveling along the adjacent US 101 highway. This will be qualitatively discussed in the report.
84 Mr. Ron Sissem
April 15, 2025

Page 2 of 6 ends

Traffic Operations Analysis
The purpose of the traffic operations analysis is to evaluate the effects of the site development on key intersections in the vicinity of the project area. Preliminarily, we have identified the need to study up to three intersections as part of the study. The final list of study intersections will be identified in consultation with City staff. The study will include an evaluation of intersection levels of service analysis and signal and stop sign warrant checks at the identified study intersections. Each of the identified study intersections will be evaluated for project impacts during the AM and PM peak commute hours. Our scope and budget includes the evaluation of one development scenario. Conducting analysis for and evaluating alternative project descriptions or phases will require additional time and budget.

Study Scenarios
The proposed study scenarios are summarized below.
 Existing Conditions: Existing traffic volumes on the existing roadway network.  Existing Plus Project Conditions: Existing traffic volumes + proposed project trips on the existing roadway network.
 Background Conditions: Existing traffic volumes + trips from approved development projects.  Background Plus Project Conditions: Existing traffic volumes + trips from approved development projects + proposed project trips.
 Cumulative Conditions: Future traffic projections with and without proposed project trips on the planned roadway network.

Study Intersections
Traffic conditions at the following intersections will be evaluated:

1. 4th Street and Nestles Road

2. 4th Street and US 101 Northbound Ramps

3. Front Street and Nestles Road
Additional locations will require authorization and additional budget.

Study Tasks
The tasks to be included for the traffic operations analysis are as follows:

1. Site Reconnaissance. The physical characteristics of the site and the surrounding roadway network will be reviewed to identify existing roadway cross-sections, intersection lane configurations, traffic control devices, intersection traffic signal cycle lengths, and surrounding land uses.

2. Observation of Existing Conditions. Existing traffic conditions will be observed in the field during the peak hours in order to identify any operational deficiencies and to confirm the accuracy of calculated levels of service.

3. Data Collection. New manual peak-hour turning movement counts will be conducted at each of the study intersections. The fee estimate includes costs for conducting new peak-period intersection turning movement counts at each of the three study intersections. AM and PM peak-hour pedestrian volumes also will be collected at the intersections. Additional counts will require authorization and additional budget. 85 Mr. Ron Sissem
April 15, 2025

Page 3 of 6 ends

4. Evaluation of Existing Conditions. The existing traffic conditions at the study intersections will be evaluated with SYNCHRO software using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition level of service methodology and current peak-hour volumes. Unsignalized intersections also will be analyzed using peak hour traffic signal warrants.

5. Site Traffic Projections. Based on the proposed development size and land use, site-generated traffic will be estimated using the appropriate vehicular trip generation rates published in the latest edition of ITE’s Trip Generation. The directional distribution of site-generated traffic will be developed based on existing traffic patterns in the area, the available roadway network, and the locations of complementary land uses. The site-generated traffic will be added to the roadway network based on this trip distribution pattern. The preliminary trip generation estimates, trip distribution pattern, and trip assignment will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to inclusion in the traffic study.

6. Evaluation of Existing Plus Project Conditions. Project-generated traffic will be added to existing traffic volumes to yield existing plus project traffic volumes. Intersection level of service calculations will be conducted using SYNCHRO to estimate the operating levels of service at the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours under existing plus project conditions.

7. Evaluation of Background Conditions. Lists of approved development projects (including size, use, and location) will be obtained from the City of Soledad and Monterey County. Hexagon will develop trip generation estimates and trip distribution patterns for approved projects in the vicinity of the study area.

The approved trips will be added to the existing peak-hour volumes to obtain traffic volumes for background conditions. Roadway improvements associated with approved developments will be assumed as directed by the City. Intersection levels of service under background conditions will be evaluated using SYNCHRO.

8. Evaluation of Background Plus Project Conditions. Project trips will be added to background traffic volumes to yield traffic volumes under background plus project conditions. Intersection levels of service under background plus project conditions will be evaluated using SYNCHRO. Background plus project conditions will be compared to background conditions for the purpose of identifying potential project impacts.

9. Evaluation of Cumulative Conditions. Lists of pending developments will be obtained from City of Soledad and Monterey County. Hexagon will develop trip generation estimates and trip distribution patterns for the pending projects in the vicinity of the study area. Trips from the pending developments will be added to the background peak-hour volumes to estimate traffic volumes for cumulative no-project conditions. Roadway improvements associated with cumulative developments will be assumed as directed by the City. Site-generated traffic estimated in Task 5 will be added to cumulative no-project traffic volumes to yield traffic conditions under cumulative plus project conditions. Intersection level of service calculations will be conducted to estimate the operating levels during the AM and PM peak hours under cumulative no-project and cumulative with project conditions. Cumulative project impacts will be evaluated relative to cumulative no-project conditions. Intersection levels of service under cumulative conditions will be evaluated using SYNCHRO.

10. Signal and Stop Sign Warrant Analysis. The need for signalization or implementation of roundabouts or stop signs at the unsignalized study intersections will be evaluated on the basis of the Peak-Hour Warrant (Warrant 3 – Part B) and guidance for the implementation of stop signs in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The warrants will be evaluated using peak-hour volumes for all study scenarios.

11. Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities. A qualitative analysis of the project’s effect on transit service in the area and on bicycle and pedestrian circulation in the study area will be included in the traffic report. 86 Mr. Ron Sissem
April 15, 2025

Page 4 of 6 ends

12. Site Access, On-Site Circulation, and Parking Analysis. Site access will be evaluated based on locations of the proposed project site entrances. This will include a qualitative analysis of the access to the project parcel, evaluation of the number and location of the access points and required control devices at the access points. Vehicle queuing and vehicle storage capacity at proposed entrances to the project site also will be evaluated. A review of the project site circulation concept will be performed to determine if adequate on-site circulation is provided and to identify any access or circulation issues that should be resolved. Necessary improvements will be identified. Additionally, the proposed parking supply on the site will be compared to City parking requirements and documented in the traffic report.

13. Description of Impacts and Recommendations. Based on the results of the level of service calculations and signal warrant analyses, impacts of the site-generated traffic will be identified and described.

Recommendations will be formulated that identify the locations and types of improvements or modifications necessary to mitigate significant project impacts. Improvements could include street widenings, lane additions, changes in lane usage, addition of traffic signals, or modifying existing traffic signals. Additionally, mitigation and/or traffic impact fees associated with any individual and/or cumulative project impacts will be described.

Reports
Hexagon’s findings and recommendations will be summarized in an administrative draft report. Following review and comment (on the administrative draft) by project staff, a draft report will be submitted for review by City staff. Hexagon will prepare a final report that addresses all of the comments received from City staff. This final report will be included in the environmental document. Following public review and comment, Hexagon will assist with responding to public comments, with a maximum of four hours of staff time allocated to respond to public comments.

Meetings
Our cost estimate includes Hexagon staff attendance at up to one meeting with City staff and/or or the project team in connection with the project. Attendance at additional meetings, public hearings, and neighborhood or community meetings would require authorization and additional budget and would be billed as Additional Services.

ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Any work not specifically referenced in the above Scope of Services—for example analyzing a different project description, conducting intersection counts, analyzing additional scenarios, conducting other technical analyses not described above, attending public hearings, and providing feasibility drawings or cost estimates for mitigation measures—shall be considered additional services. Additional services will require additional budget and time.

TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Barring any unforeseen delays, an administrative draft report will be submitted eight weeks after: (1) authorization to proceed and (2) Hexagon’s work scope is approved by the City. The draft and final reports will be delivered one week after receipt of all respective review comments. We are ready to start work on this project immediately upon authorization. You may authorize us to proceed by signing our attached standard contract or providing one of your own for our review and signature.

COST OF SERVICES
The cost for services rendered under this agreement will be a lump sum amount of $33,500 which includes the completion of both the VMT Evaluation and Traffic Operations scope tasks, as outlined in our Scope of 87 Mr. Ron Sissem
April 15, 2025

Page 5 of 6 ends

Services. Billings will be conducted monthly, on a percent complete basis. Additional Services shall be provided upon authorization and, if requested, will be billed separately. This price quote is good for 30 days.

This price quote assumes all project-related activities will be completed within one year. An extended project schedule may require additional budget for project administration.

We appreciate your consideration of Hexagon Transportation Consultants for this assignment. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,
HEXAGON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC.

Robert Del Rio, T.E.

Vice President and Principal Associate
Task Cost Breakdown
Soledad Renewable Oasis Development
Total Task
Task Description Cost
VMT Evaluation
1 Qualatative VMT Screening Discussion $3,540
Local Traffic Operations
1 Site Reconnaissance $310
2 Observation of Existing Conditions $310
3 Data Collection $1,510
4 Evaluation of Existing Conditions $1,460
5 Site Traffic Projections $1,460
6 Evaluation of Existing Plus Project Conditions $730
7 Evaluation of Background Conditions $2,810
8 Evaluation of Background plus Project Conditions $730 9 Evaluation of Cumulative Conditions $2,700
10 Signal and Stop Sign Warrant Analysis $1,040
11 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities $675
12 Site Access and Circulation Analysis $2,080
13 Description of Impacts and Recommendations $1,350
14 Reports & Meetings $12,795
Operations Sub-Total $29,960
Project Total $33,500
88 Environmental Noise Assessment
Scope of Work (WJV Acoustics) C

ATTACHMENT
89 Aviation Noise Studies ꞏ Community Noise ꞏ Architectural Acoustics ꞏ Environmental Noise Assessments 113 N. Church Street, Suite 203 ∙ Visalia, CA 93291∙ (559) 627-4923 1846 (Soledad Renewable Oasis)
March 17, 2025
Ron Sissem
Senior Principal
EMC PLANNING GROUP INC.
601 Abrego Street
Monterey, California 93940
RE: ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT, SOLEDAD RENEWABLE OASIS,

SOLEDAD, CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr. Sissem:

Based upon the information you have provided, WJV Acoustics, Inc. (WJVA) is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare an environmental noise assessment for the above‐referenced project.

Following is a description of our proposed scope of services, fee, and schedule for completion.

Scope of Services:

1.  Conduct a project site inspection to evaluate the acoustical characteristics of the project site  and  surrounding  area,  note  the  locations  of  nearby  noise‐sensitive  receptors  and identify  existing  noise  sources  in  the  project  area.  Conduct  ambient  noise  monitoring at representative  locations  throughout  the  project  vicinity  that  could  have  potential noise‐related conflicts as a result of the proposed project. It is anticipated that continuous 24‐hour ambient noise measurements will be conducted at up to two (2) locations using automated noise monitors and that short‐term sampling of ambient noise levels will be conducted at up to four (4) additional sites.

2.  Analyze  potential  project‐related  changes  in  roadway  traffic  noise  exposure  along roadways near or adjacent to the project site. Calculations will be performed using the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model and traffic data to be obtained from the project traffic engineer or other sources as may be appropriate. Compare project‐related changes in traffic noise exposure to applicable City of Soledad noise level standards and other thresholds of significance.
90 Ron Sissem
Senior Principal
EMC PLANNING GROUP INC.

March 17, 2025

Page 2 ends

1846 (Soledad Renewable Oasis)

3.  Evaluate  potential  noise  impacts  from  the  project  as  they  may  affect  existing  noise‐ sensitive uses in the project area. Anticipated sources of operational noise to be analyzed include (but are not limited to) on‐site truck and vehicle movements, convenience store operations, truck repair operations, and quick service (drive‐thru) restaurant operations.

4.  Quantify  noise  and  vibration  levels  that  would  likely  occur  during  construction  of  the project as they could affect nearby existing or planned noise‐sensitive receptors. Identify nearby existing or planned noise‐sensitive receptors that could be subjected to noise or vibration levels in excess of applicable noise standards or CEQA thresholds as a result of the project construction.

5.  Prepare recommendations for noise mitigation as may be required to reduce significant noise impacts to less‐than‐significant. Significance will be based on City of Soledad noise standards and the CEQA Guidelines criteria. Identify any significant project‐related noise impacts that cannot be reasonably mitigated.

6.  Prepare  a  written  technical  report  summarizing  the  methods,  findings,  and recommendations of the study. The report and associated exhibits will be formatted to facilitate incorporation into the CEQA documents being prepared for the project.

Fee:

WJVA  proposes  to  provide  the  services  described  above  for  a  total  fee  of  $5,850,  including expenses. Attendance of meetings or hearings, if required, would be subject to additional charges based upon the enclosed Fee Schedule plus expenses. Full payment for services rendered will be due upon submittal of the completed report.

Schedule For Completion:

Work  will  be  scheduled  for  completion  in  compliance  with  the  overall  project  schedule.  It  is anticipated that the noise study will be completed within 30 days after receipt of all necessary maps, traffic data, project information and the notice‐to‐proceed. 91 Ron Sissem
Senior Principal
EMC PLANNING GROUP INC.

March 17, 2025

Page 3 ends

1846 (Soledad Renewable Oasis)
We  are  looking  forward  to  the  possibility  of  working  with  you  on  this  project.  Please  do  not hesitate to contact me at (559) 627‐4923 or [email protected] if you have any questions or would like additional information.

Sincerely,
WJV ACOUSTICS, INC.

Walter J. Van Groningen
President
WJV:wjv
Enclosure:   Fee Schedule
92 Aviation Noise Studies ꞏ Community Noise ꞏ Architectural Acoustics ꞏ Environmental Noise Assessments 113 N. Church Street, Suite 203 ∙ Visalia, CA 93291∙ (559) 627-4923 1846 (Soledad Renewable Oasis)

FEE SCHEDULE
WJV Acoustics, Inc.

January 1, 2025
Labor: Time spent on behalf of a client is charged as follows:

Principal Consultant:      $185/hour
Consultant:      $160/hour
Technician:      $95/hour
Clerical:      $85/hour
Time spent includes travel to/from WJVA’s Visalia office.

A surcharge of 50% over the above rates will be charged for expert witness testimony.

Direct Charges:  Direct charges include actual costs for travel, lodging, meals, mileage, equipment fees, computer services, printing and similar costs.  Mileage is charged at the standard IRS rate.

Retainer: A retainer of up to 50% of the total fee may be required for new clients or jobs where initial expenses are anticipated to exceed $500.

Note:  A Finance Charge of 1% per month, which is 12% per annum, may be charged on accounts not paid within 30 days of invoice.
93 City of Soledad Attachment 3
Community and Economic Development – Planning Division May 21, 2025 Soledad Renewable Truck Depot
Proposed Soledad Renewable Oasis Project
Project Developer: 1850 Properties
Location: 701 Nestles Road, Soledad, CA
Project Overview
• Applicant: 1850 Properties – https://www.1850properties.com/properties • Site: 19.33 acres of undeveloped land
• Location: 701 Nestles Road, Monterey County
• Project Type: Truck Depot with Renewable Energy Components • Purpose: Support sustainable transportation and trucking operations Draft Site Plans provided by 1850 Properties
For Presentation Purposes Only
Draft Landscape Plans provided by 1850 Properties
For Presentation Purposes Only
94 For any questions on the status or project description, please email [email protected] Project Goals
• Balance economic development with environmental sustainability • Serve truck drivers, local traffic, and Highway 101 travelers • Provide a comprehensive range of services
• Incorporate conventional and renewable energy features Key Facility Components
Truck Depot Facility
• Truck parking and fueling stations
• EV charging, renewable diesel, and biodiesel
• Driver amenities:
o Mini-mart
o Restaurant
o Lounge and showers
Renewable Energy Features
• Large-Scale Solar Array
o Covers parking areas
• Energy Storage & Backup
o Battery storage systems to ensure power reliability
Truck Service & Support
Truck Service Center
• Full-service truck maintenance and repair
Accessory Uses
• Retail outlets
• Drive-thru restaurants
• Sit-down dining options
Alignment with City Goals
• Supports Soledad’s Economic Development Strategy
• Enhances local services and amenities
• Promotes sustainable infrastructure and clean energy use • Positions Soledad as a regional transportation hub
Next Steps
• City review and entitlement process
• Environmental and technical studies
• Community input and engagement
• Final design and permitting
95 For any questions on the status or project description, please email [email protected] 3 Example of Other Projects Completed by Developer:
96 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 6229, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving City Event and Street Closure of Front Street Between Main Street and Soledad Street for the 2025 Music in the Park Concert Series
TO: Honorable Mayor Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Beatriz Trujillo, Community and Economic Development Director, Ariana Mora, Senior Planner
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025

CITY OF SOLEDAD

STAFF REPORT
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Soledad consider and adopt Resolution No.6229, “Approving City Event and Street Closure of Front Street Between Main Street and Soledad Street for the 2025 Music in the Park Concert Series".

Executive Summary
The Soledad Parks and Recreation Department, in collaboration with the Community Engagement Department, is launching the City’s first Music in the Park series, an initiative designed to enhance community engagement and activate Downtown Soledad through free, family-friendly programming.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve in-kind services and a temporary street closure to support the 2025 series, which will be held at Cesar Chavez Park (502 Front Street) on three Fridays:

June 13, July 11, and August 8, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Each event will feature live music, food vendors, and children’s activities, offering a safe and vibrant event for residents of all ages. As a Citysponsored event, Music in the Park aligns with Soledad’s mission to promote inclusive, family-oriented events and strengthen connections among community members. Approval of the requested support will allow the City to provide a high-quality public experience that enhances the cultural vitality of Downtown Soledad.

Background
The Soledad Parks and Recreation Department (SPR), in partnership with the Community Engagement Department (Community Engagement), is launching the first Music in the Park series to bring the community together through live music and food vendors. Held at Cesar Chavez Park in the heart of Downtown Soledad, the event will offer a fun, welcoming space for families while supporting local businesses and energizing the downtown area.
97 Review & Analysis
Soledad residents have shown strong support for community events in Downtown Soledad. Building on this momentum, the Soledad Parks and Recreation (SPR) Department, in partnership with the Community Engagement Department, is introducing the Music in the Park series to provide a safe, family-friendly space featuring live music and food vendors.

The series will take place at Cesar Chavez Park on June 13, July 11, and August 8, 2025. Event hours will be from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., which includes setup and cleanup time. Each event will showcase different musical acts organized by SPR, along with a variety of food vendors. To support the event, staff is requesting approval for the temporary closure of Front Street between Main Street and Soledad Street to accommodate food vendors and ensure safe pedestrian access. In addition to the street closure, Staff is requesting in-kind City services essential to the success of this City-sponsored event. This includes:

Use of the Gateway Center as the event headquarters and its backyard patio as the main stage.

Police Department support for patrol and traffic control.

Public Works assistance with event equipment, including lighting, traffic signage, garbage cans, a generator, and restroom access at Cesar Chavez Park.

These coordinated efforts will help ensure a vibrant and successful community event that enhances the Downtown experience for Soledad families. Furthermore, approval of the street closure and City services will also strengthen the City's commitment to supporting programs that benefit the community, ensuring that families have access to enriching and engaging activities at no cost.

Financial Considerations
The estimated cost of the Music in the Park Concert Series is $7,500 ($2,500 per event). However, these costs are anticipated to be recouped through vendor permits and sponsorships. Staffing costs are already included in the department budgets. Thus, it is unlikely that the concert series will impact the General Fund.

Alternatives
Approve the City event and Street closure as recommended.

Do not approve the City event and provide other directions to the Staff Planning/CEQA
The City of Soledad has determined that the proposed action of approving the city event at Cesar Chavez Park and closing the street is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Guidelines Section 15378. This is because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378.

Public Notice Requirements
98 Resolution No. 6229
Music in the Park Street Closure Map
None.

Attachment(s):
99 1
RESOLUTION NO. 6229

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLEDAD

APPROVING CITY EVENT AND STREET CLOSURE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND SOLEDAD STREET FOR THE 2025 MUSIC IN THE

PARK CONCERT SERIES
WHEREAS, the City of Soledad is implementing its first Music In the Park Concert series hosted by Soledad Parks and Recreation (SPR) and Community Engagement; and WHEREAS, the event aims to bring the community together through live music and food vendors; and
WHEREAS, the event will be a safe and fun activity at the heart of Downtown Soledad, contributing to the city’s commitment to supporting programs that benefit the community and ensuring that families have access to enriching and engaging activities; and WHEREAS, Soledad residents have come to embrace local events and it is a great way to connect businesses and residents, add vibrancy to the Downtown and create a safe environment for local families; and
WHEREAS, as a result of these benefits, Staff recommends approval of the series of events, scheduled for June 13, July 11 and August 8, 2025, at Cesar Chavez Park from 3:00 pm10:00 pm including time to set-up and clean-up; and WHEREAS, to provide a safe pedestrian area and accommodate activities like live music, and food vendors, it is proposed that Front Street between Main Street to Soledad Street be closed.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Soledad hereby approves the City Event for the Music in the Park Concert Series and temporary closure of Front Street between Main Street and Soledad Street on June 13, July 11, and August 8, 2025, from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Soledad duly held on the 21st day of May 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
100
2 ____________________________
ANNA M. VELAZQUEZ, Mayor
ATTEST:

MEGAN HUNTER, City Clerk
101
102
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 6230, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Soledad Approving In-Kind City Services, Waiving Park Fee and Approving the Street Closure of Front Street Between West Street and East Street for the 4th Annual Soledad Hot Summer Days Event TO: Honorable Mayor Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Darlene Noriega, Deputy City Clerk and Megan Hunter, City Manager MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025

CITY OF SOLEDAD

STAFF REPORT
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.

Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Soledad consider and approve Resolution No. 6230, “Approving In-Kind City Services, Waiving Park Fee and Approving the Street Closure of Front Street Between West Street and East Street for the 4th Annual Soledad Hot Summer Days Event”.

Executive Summary
Over the past three years, the Soledad Police Department, in collaboration with various city departments, has worked with the Salinas Crusaders Car Club, a local community group, to organize an annual car show and street festival called Soledad Hot Summer Days. This year, the City of Soledad will take the lead in organizing the event, with support from multiple city departments and the Salinas Crusaders Car Club. Now in its fourth year, the event is scheduled for July 26th from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM and will be held in Downtown Soledad along Front Street, between West and East Streets, as well as in Cesar Chavez Park.

The event will feature a wide variety of food vendors, outdoor entertainment, and a car show. City staff are seeking approval for the following:

1. Closure of Front Street between West and East Streets, including one-block sections extending to Monterey Street from Benito Street to East Street, from 6:00 AM to 7:00 PM.

2. A fee waiver for the use of Cesar Chavez Park.

3. In-kind services from multiple departments, particularly the Public Works and Police Departments.

Background
In 2022, the Soledad Merchants Association, in partnership with the Salinas Crusaders “Crusaders” Car Club and the Soledad Police Department, hosted the first Hot Summer Days car show and street 103
festival. In 2023, the City assumed a more prominent role in organizing the event and is currently the leading coordinator. On May 14, 2025, the City of Soledad submitted a Temporary Land Use Permit (TUP) application and request for sponsorship. This event is subject to the TUP process due to street closures. The event also requires a noise permit, special event permit, and park reservation permit. In addition to the TUP and associated permits, staff is also requesting a waiver of park fees for Cesar Chavez Park and in-kind services.

Under Soledad Municipal Code 17.42.015, a temporary use permit is required when:

C. 2. Commercial carnivals, circuses, musical concerts and similar events and congregations of people when conducted on private property and when involving more than one hundred people.

C. 5. Street closures, farmers markets, or craft shows of not more than 4 days per month, taking place on public property or private properties, in appropriately zoned commercial areas and when having obtained any other necessary approvals …”
And where:

D. (4). a. All fee waiver requests shall be reviewed and determined by the city council D. (4).b. Events requesting the use of city staff or equipment for “in-kind” services shall be reviewed and determined by the city council.

It is proposed that the City partner with the Crusaders to undertake this event. The Crusaders will be responsible for hosting the car show, while the City will oversee other activities on a public street where more than 1000 people are expected to attend. Therefore, the temporary use permit can be issued administratively. However, the applicant must receive permission from the Council to host events on public property. Consistent with the prior three years, the applicant is requesting to close Front Street between West and East Streets and use Cesar Chavez Park for the event, as shown in Attachment A.

Review & Analysis
This year, the City of Soledad, in collaboration with the Salinas Crusaders “Crusaders” Car Club, plans to host the 4th Annual Soledad Hot Summer Days event, which has become a tradition in the city. The event will feature outdoor activities, informational booths, food vendors, entertainment, and a car show in downtown Soledad. The main goal of this event is to engage with the community, promote downtown businesses, and raise funds for the Soledad Community Center Capital Campaign. The event is scheduled for July 26, 2025, from 11:00 am to 4:00 pm, but the street closure will extend from 6:00 am to 7:00 pm for set-up and clean-up time. This year, the event will conclude at 4:00 pm instead of 6:00 pm, as in prior years, to reduce costs.

As outlined above, Hot Summer Days involves the closure of Front Street in downtown Soledad to display cars and provide a space for various activities and entertainment. In addition, the applicants are requesting street closures for each intersection block from Benito Street to East Street between Front and Monterey Streets. A map has been provided to clearly identify the streets that will be closed (See Map Exhibit “A”). Public Works will coordinate with the Soledad Police Department to place barricades, traffic signage, and other equipment as needed. The Soledad Police Department will be present to coordinate traffic control and safety throughout the event.

The Soledad Recreation Department will host games and activities at Cesar Chavez Park for families and children. This annual event will feature local vendor booths and food trucks and will prioritize local Front Street businesses for booth opportunities. Although the City would not typically charge itself for the $150 park fee, since this event is co-sponsored by the Crusaders, staff decided it is best to formally request that the City Council waive the park fee.
104
Resolution No. 6230
Attachment A
Financial Report - 2024 Hot Summer Days
The City of Soledad is leading the partnership with the Crusaders and will be responsible for business outreach, ensuring that businesses along Front Street are minimally impacted. Additionally, the City of Soledad will ensure that all vendors participating in the event obtain necessary permits, including temporary use, special events, business licenses, and health permits, to comply with state and local health and safety regulations.

Financial Considerations
Residents of Soledad have expressed a desire for more city-sponsored events through last year's budget survey. "Hot Summer Days" is one of the most attended events each year, with proceeds donated to the Soledad Community Center Capital Campaign. Last year, this event raised $7,315 for the Community Center.

It is estimated that the in-kind cost for staffing this event will be approximately $6,000. Staff support for community events like "Hot Summer Days" is considered during the development of the annual operating budget and has been included in the Fiscal Year 24/25 budget. It is recommended that the City continue to account for these costs in the upcoming FY 25/26 budget and include a $5,000 line item for professional services and supplies, such as porta-potty rentals. However, staff is confident we can defray these costs as has happened in previous years through sponsorships.

It is important to note that many city staff members who support this event volunteer their time, which helps to reduce the overall in-kind service costs.

Alternatives
Approve the Resolution as presented; or
Deny the Resolution of in-kind city services, waiving of park fee, and the street closure of Front Street between West Street and East Street for the 3rd Annual Soledad Hot Summer Days event.

Planning/CEQA
The annual Soledad Hot Summer Days and the associated requests for street closure, waiver of park fees, and in-kind services are considered exempt under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15304 (e) Class 4 Minor Alteration to Land. Pursuant to CEQA, minor temporary land use with minimal or no permanent effects on the environment, such as carnivals and Christmas tree sales, is exempt.

Public Notice Requirements
Not Required.

Attachment(s):
105
RESOLUTION NO. 6230

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLEDAD

APPROVING OF IN-KIND CITY SERVICES, WAIVING PARK FEE AND

APPROVING THE STREET CLOSURE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN WEST STREET AND EAST STREET FOR THE 4TH ANNUAL SOLEDAD HOT SUMMER

DAYS EVENT
WHEREAS, the Salinas Crusaders Car Club “Crusaders” in collaboration with the Soledad Police Department has been organizing the annual Soledad Hot Summer Days in the City of Soledad for the past three years; and
WHEREAS, this year, the City of Soledad in collaboration with the Crusaders plans to host the 4th Annual Soledad Hot Summer Days event, which has now become a tradition in the City; and
WHEREAS, the event includes outdoor activities, informational booths, food vendors, entertainment, and a car show in Downtown Soledad along Front Street and in Cesar Chavez Park; and
WHEREAS, now in its 4th year, the event will take place on July 26th from 11:00 am to 4:00 pm and involve the closure of Front Street between West and East Streets, and along one block sections up to Monterey Street from Benito Street to East Street between 6:00 am to 7:00 pm to allow for a car display area and to facilitate pedestrian safety to and from Cesar Chavez Park to the Downtown corridor; and
WHEREAS, the City of Soledad and the Crusaders are also requesting City sponsorship to formally waive the park fee for Cesar Chavez Park and allow for in-kind services for use of city equipment and staff support with traffic control, maintenance, and enforcement; and WHEREAS, the annual Soledad Hot Summer Days and associated requests for the street closure, waiving of park fee, and in-kind services are considered exempt under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15304 (e) Class 4 Minor Alteration to Land as a minor temporary land use with minimal or no permanent effects on the environment; and WHEREAS, the main goal of Hot Summer Days 2025 is to create a free, safe, family friendly event and raise funds for the Soledad Community Center Capital Campaign.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Soledad hereby approves the temporary closure of Front Street between West and East Streets, and along one block sections up to Monterey Street from Benito Street to East Street on July 26, 2025, between the hours of 6:00 am and 7:00 pm; the provision of in-kind city services including city equipment and staff support from the Soledad Police Department, Public Works, Community and Economic Development, and Parks and Recreation Departments; and waiver of park fees for Cesar Chavez Park on July 26th for Soledad Hot Summer Days.
106
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Soledad at a regular meeting duly held on the 21st day of May 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

ANNA M. VELAZQUEZ, Mayor
ATTEST:

MEGAN HUNTER, City Clerk
107
Emergency Vehicles
Crusaders
Monterey St- Through traffic to lead to public parking and for vendors

ALL CARS WILL BE DISPLAYED ALONG FRONT STREET TOUCHA TRUCK

MAINRESTROOMS

ENTERTAINMENT
Kid’s Area

SOLEDAD HOT SUMMER DAYS
JULY 26, 2025
11AM TO 4PM ENTRANCE Benito St - CLOSURE Encinal ST- Will be used for Vendor Route CLOSURE Vendors CARS CLOSURE- Historical Society & Police Vehicle Display Restrooms Dumpster
Kidder Street - CLOSURE
East street --- CLOSURE
Attachment A108
Date: December 3, 2024
To: Megan Hunter, City Manager
From: Jesus Yanez, Financial Analyst
Cc: Mike Howard, Finance Director
Re: Financial Report – 2024 Hot Summer Days Event
The following financial report summarizes the revenue collected for the 2024 Hot Summer Days Event.

Financial Report
All funds collected will be allocated to fund Community Center programs.

Highlights
To facilitate the collection of payments and donations, three different links were set up on the City’s “Easy Pay” website as follows:
• Vendor Registration
• Car Registration
• Youth Violence Prevention Program Donation
Certain donations were received via check or by phone as noted above. Out of the $8,415.00 funds collected, $1,100.00 were refunded to vendors that paid but opted not to participate in the event. This left the City with $7,315 in net collections.

The $1,820.00 collected from car registrations has been donated to the City and will not need to be paid back to Salinas Crusaders.

Description Count Amount
Donation received via check or phone 2 $ 450.00
Vendor Payment (online) 26 5,550.00
Car Registration (online) 52 1,820.00
Youth Violence Prevention Program Donation (online) 17 595.00 Grand Total 97 8,415.00
Less Vendor Refunds (did not participate in event) (250.00) (250.00)
(300.00)
(300.00)
(1,100.00)
Total Net Collected $7,315.00
109
SUBJECT: Receive Soledad Police Department AB 481 Annual Report and Provide Direction
TO: Honorable Mayor Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Mike Rodriquez, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025

CITY OF SOLEDAD

STAFF REPORT
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council receive the Soledad Police Department’s AB 481 Annual Report and provide Staff with direction on publicizing the report and bringing the same back for Council and public comment and consideration.

Executive Summary
Per Assembly Bill 481, as codified in Government Code Section 7070, et seq., in 2022 the City Council was compelled to adopt an ordinance approving policies applicable to the Police Department’s use of military equipment. After adoption of said ordinance, the City’s Police Department is required to provide the Council with an Annual Report concerning the previous year’s use of military equipment and make the report available for Council and public comment. The Report is then used by the Council as part of its annual review and renewal of the City’s Military Equipment Use Policy Ordinance, which will be scheduled for July 16, 2025.

Background
Effective January 1, 2022, Assembly Bill 481 (codified in Government Code Section 7070, et seq.) requires legislative bodies to adopt ordinances approving military equipment use policies before law enforcement agencies can continue to engage in specified activities related to the use of what the state legislature has defined as “military equipment” in Government Code Section 7070. Ordinance No. 743 “Approving Soledad Police Department Policy Manual Policy 706-Military Equipment” was approved by the City Council on June 15, 2022.
110
Review & Analysis
Government Code Section 7071(e)(1) states that a governing body shall review any ordinance it has adopted pursuant to this section approving the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment at least annually and, subject to paragraph (e)(2), vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular meeting. Said review is scheduled for the City Council meeting of July 16, 2025.

Government Code Section 7072 also provides that any law enforcement agency that receives approval for a military use policy pursuant to Section 7071 shall submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved. The Annual Report is meant to provide yearly information about each type of military equipment that was approved by Council. The report contains a summary of how the equipment is used (if at all), any complaints or concerns received about the equipment, and any associated costs related to the equipment’s use. The law enforcement agency shall also make each annual military equipment report required by this section publicly available on its website.

After submitting an annual military equipment report to its governing body, and making said report and related documents available to the public for review for a minimum of 30 days, the law enforcement agency is required to hold at least one well-publicized meeting at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the report and the law enforcement agency’s funding, acquisition or use of military equipment. The City plans to hold such a meeting as a part of its regular City Council meeting on July 16, 2025.

The City’s Police Department has now prepared its 2024-2025 AB 481 Annual Report, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment 1. No action needs to be taken this evening other than to accept the report, direct that it be posted on the Police Department and City’s websites, and direct that the “meeting” to allow public questions and input on the Report be appropriately publicized before the July 16 meeting. The Council is also free to ask any questions regarding the Annual Report.

Financial Considerations
There are no financial impacts associated with the submission of the Police Department’s AB 481 Annual Report.

Alternatives
Accept the AB 481 Annual Report and provide direction to Staff concerning publicizing the report for public review and comment.

Do not accept the Report and provide alternative direction to Staff. This is not recommended as the acceptance of the Report is a prerequisite to subsequent action that must be taken by the City concerning the City’s Military Equipment Ordinance.

Planning/CEQA
Submission of the Police Department’s AB 481 Annual Report is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Said action is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines since there is no potential for the action to result in direct or indirect physical change to the environment. In addition, the action is not subject to CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061, as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility it may have a significant effect on the environment.
111
AB 481 Annual Report
Public Notice Requirements
None required.

Attachment(s):
112
Soledad Police Department
AB 481 Annual Report 2024-2025
Annual Report
AB 481 requires the Police Department to provide the City Council and the public with a report outlining how the military equipment possessed and/or acquired by the City during the previous year was used in order to ensure the police department is adhering to its policy and the City ordinance concerning military equipment. The Soledad Police Department has not acquired any new equipment that would be considered “military equipment” pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 7070 et seq.

1. M16A2 Commando 5.56 patrol carbine rifles
A. A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use.

These weapons may be deployed in circumstances in which an officer can articulate a reasonable expectation that the rifle may be needed. (E.g., where an officer anticipates an armed encounter, need for long range fire, where an officer believes a suspect may be wearing body armor). Use of the ammunition for these weapons requires special training by POST certified trainers.

B. A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. None.

C. The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. None.

D. The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the year following submission of the annual military equipment report. Minimal maintenance and training costs, paid for out of Police Department Budget.

E. The quantity possessed of each type of military equipment. Thirteen.

F. If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment. None.

2. Ammunition for M16A2 Commando 5.56 patrol carbine rifles A. A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. Used for target practice only.

B. A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. None.

C. The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. None.

D. The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the year following submission of the annual military equipment report. No cost for this reporting period.
113
E. The quantity possessed of each type of military equipment. 7,559 +/- rounds.

F. If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment. None. 114
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 772, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Soledad Amending Section 3.24.080 Bidding Procedures for Public Works Construction Projects of Chapter 3.24- Purchase System of the Soledad Municipal Code
TO: Honorable Mayor Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Mike Rodriquez, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025

CITY OF SOLEDAD

STAFF REPORT
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.

Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council consider, waive reading and introduce by title only an ordinance of the City Council “Amending Section 3.24.080-Bidding Procedures for Public Works Construction Projects of Chapter 3.24-Purchase System of the Soledad Municipal Code”.

Executive Summary
On September 2, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5635 adopting the public works contract bidding procedures established by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (“UPCCAA”). Thereafter, on October 7, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 whereby, pursuant to the provisions of the UPCCAA, the City codified uniform public construction cost accounting procedures allowing the City to dispense with the normal statutory process used for bidding and awarding public works projects and replacing the same with a process that established requirements for public works contracts in three categories- no bid contracts for projects under $60,000, informal contracts for projects between $60,000 and $200,000, and formal contract bidding procedures for projects exceeding $200,000. Pursuant to AB 2192, which became effective in January of 2025, provisions of the UPCCAA were amended to slightly broaden the definition of a “public project” and to increase the monetary thresholds applied to the three categories of public works contracts referenced above. Staff is recommending that the Council consider waive reading and introduce Ordinance No. 772, which will amend Section 3.24.080 of the Soledad Municipal Code to reflect these changes.

Background
California law requires general law cities such as Soledad to advertise public works projects for competitive bidding if an involved project is anticipated to cost more than $5,000. An alternative contracting process for public works has been established in the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (“UPCCAA”), as set forth in California Public Contract Code, 115
Sections 22000 through 22050. The intent of the UPCCAA is to promote uniformity of cost accounting standards and allow greater flexibility for public agencies in the public contract bidding process.

The UPCCAA allows local agencies that elect to follow the cost accounting procedures in the “Cost Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual” to use alternative bidding procedures when they hire contractors to perform public works projects. Contracts are broken into three categories: no-bid contracts, informal contracts, and formal bidding contracts, each with its own monetary threshold and set of procedures as set by statute and manual provisions.

On September 2, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution No. 5635, adopting and agreeing to have the City be subject to the alternative bidding and contracting procedures of the UPCCAA. Thereafter, in October of 2020, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 “Amending Chapter 3.24-Purchase System of the Soledad Municipal Code by the Addition of New Section 3.24.080 Bidding Procedures for Public Works Construction Projects.” At the time Ordinance No. 735 was adopted, the monetary thresholds established for the three categories of contractual bidding, no bid, informal, and formal, were $60,000, $200,000, and any amount over $200,000, respectively.

Review & Analysis
Pursuant to AB 2192, the public works contract bidding thresholds established for use under the UPCCAA have been increased.

The new bidding thresholds are as follows:

No Bid- Public Projects costing $75,000 or less can be performed pursuant to force account, negotiated contract or purchase order of $75,000 or less.

Informal Bidding- Public Projects costing $220,000 or less can be let to contract by informal procedures (solicitation of proposals).

Formal Bidding- Public Projects costing more than $220,000 are to be let to contract by formal noticed bidding procedures.

AB 2192 also includes language making an addition to the definition of “public projects” covered by the UPCCAA by adding “installation” work performed at publicly owned, leased or operated facilities.

This change will be useful when adding or replacing large pieces of attached equipment, like HVAC systems, at such facilities.

Staff has prepared an ordinance amending Section 3.24.080 of Chapter 3.24 Purchase System of the Soledad Municipal Code to include the UPCCAA changes referenced above. Staff believes that use of the UPCCAA process has proven to save time, money and effort in the City’s ongoing public works projects. The new monetary thresholds will also be helpful given recent and anticipated increased costs of construction materials. As such, Staff is recommending that Ordinance No. 772, be adopted.

The Council should remember that utilizing the UPCCAA process will continue to award all informal and formal public works contracts to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The City would also still be required to meet statutory requirements in its public works contracts for performance bonds, payment of prevailing wages, certificates of insurance, and funding mandates.

The Council should decide whether it wishes to waive a first reading, introduce and read Ordinance No. 116
Ordinance No. 772
772, by title only. If introduced, Staff will bring the ordinance back for consideration of adoption at a subsequent noticed public hearing.

Financial Considerations
Adoption of the proposed Municipal Code amendments set forth in Ordinance No. 772, will have no adverse financial impact on the City. Increased monetary thresholds for contract procurement procedures that do not require or only require informal bidding will continue to reduce staff time and other costs associated with the bidding process, such as the preparation and publication of bid notices.

Alternatives
Introduce Ordinance No. 772, to amend existing procedures for bidding and awarding public works contracts in accordance with the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.

Do not Introduce Ordinance No. 772,. This is not recommended as failure to adopt the proposed amendments will not allow the City to take full advantage of increased monetary thresholds for public contracts set forth in the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.

Planning/CEQA
The adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, based on 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15061(b)(3), where, as is the case here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. Additionally, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3), the proposed activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378.

Public Notice Requirements
None required for the introduction of an ordinance. If introduced, Staff will notice a public hearing in accordance with legal requirements for a subsequent meeting.

Attachment(s):
117
ORDINANCE NO. 772

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLEDAD AMENDING SECTION 3.24.080-BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRUCTION PROJECTS OF CHAPTER 3.24-PURCHASE SYSTEM OF THE SOLEDAD

MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5635 adopting the public works contract bidding procedures established by the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (“UPCCAA”); and
WHEREAS, thereafter, on October 7, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 whereby, pursuant to the provisions of the UPCCAA, the City codified uniform public construction cost accounting procedures allowing the City to dispense with the normal statutory process used for bidding and awarding pubic works projects by replacing the same with a process that established requirements for public works contracts in three categories- no bid contract for projects under $60,000, informal contracts for projects between $60,000 and $200,000, and formal bidding procedures (as are currently used), for projects exceeding $200,000; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 2192, which became effective in January of 2025, provisions of the UPCCAA were amended to slightly broaden the definition of a “public project” and to increase the monetary thresholds applied to the three categories of public works contracts, and the City now wishes to amend its Municipal Code to reflect these changes; and WHEREAS, City Staff and the Council continue to believe that the alternative bidding and award process established by the UPCCAA reduces both time and resources used in the administration of public works project contracts; and
WHEREAS, use of the UPCCAA contracting procedures will assist the City in achieving the best work at a fair price.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Soledad as follows:

Section 1. All of the recitals set forth above are true and correct to the best of the Council’s knowledge and by this action are made findings and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The definition of “Public Project” as set forth in Subsection B of Section 3.24.080 Bidding Procedures for Public Works Construction Projects of Chapter 3.24 Purchase System of the Soledad Municipal Code, is amended as follows:

3.24.080- Bidding procedures for public works construction projects …
118
B. Definitions: The definitions employed in article 1 of chapter 2, part 3, division 2 of Public Contract Code section 22000 et seq., and their statutory successors shall govern the construction of this section.

Accordingly, a “public project” means any of the following:
(i) Construction, reconstruction, erection, alteration, renovation, improvement, demolition, installation, and repair work involving any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility.
(ii) Painting or repainting of any publicly owned, leased, or operated facility. (iii) In the case of a publicly owned utility system, “public project” shall include only the construction, erection, improvement, or repair of dams, reservoirs, power plants, and electrical transmission lines of two hundred thirty thousand (230,000) volts and higher.

A “public project” does not include maintenance work, such as:
(i) Routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation or protection of any publicly owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes. (ii) Minor repainting.
(iii) Resurfacing of streets and highways at less than one inch (1”). (iv) Landscape maintenance, including mowing, watering, trimming, pruning, planting, replacement of plants, and servicing of irrigation and sprinkler systems. (v) Work performed to keep, operate, and maintain publicly owned water, power, or waste disposal systems, including, but not limited to, dams, reservoirs, power plants, and electrical transmission lines of two hundred thirty thousand (230,000) volts and higher.

Section 3. The monetary thresholds established for procedures for no bid, informal bid and formal bid public works contracts, as set forth in Subsections C 2, 3 and 4. of Section 3.24.080 Bidding Procedures for Public Works Construction Projects of Chapter 3.24 Purchase System of the Soledad Municipal Code, are amended as follows:

3.24.080- Bidding procedures for public works construction projects C. Contract Letting Procedures: Except as otherwise provided herein, the provisions of the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, Public Contract Code section 22000 et seq., shall be controlling.
…
119

2. No Bidding Required: Public projects less than or equal to seventy-five sixty thousand dollars ($6075,000.00) may be performed by city staff, by force account with a contractor, by negotiated contract, or by use of a purchase order, pursuant to section 22032 of the Public Contract Code. Although not required, the City may still seek bids or proposals for such projects on an informal basis where there is reason to believe such inquiry would be advantageous. No-bid contracts shall be awarded by the City Manager. All no-bid contracts will be reported to the City Council on a monthly basis.

3. Informal Bids: The City shall follow the following informal bidding procedure for public projects of two hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($2200,000.00) or less, or those public projects as specified in either section 22032(b) or section 22020 of the Public Contract Code.
(a) Notice: A notice inviting informal bids shall be sent to: (1) all contractors on the City’s list of qualified contractors for the category of work being bid, and (2) all construction trade journals as specified in section 22036 of the Public Contract Code and as named by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission. (i) The mailing of notices to contractors and construction trade journals shall be completed not less than ten (10) calendar days before bids are due. (ii) The notice inviting informal bids shall describe the project in general terms, how to obtain more detailed information about the project, and state the time and place for the submission of bids.
(iii) Bid documents may be transmitted or received over the internet, by facsimile and/or electronic mail.
(b) Authority To Award Bid: The City Council shall award informal contracts. The City Council may reject any or all bids presented and waive any irregularity or informality in such bids. The contact shall be awarded to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. If two or more bids are the same and the lowest, the City Council may accept the bid of its choice. In the event all informal bids received are in excess of two hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($2200,000.00), the City Council may, by passage of a resolution by a four-fifths (4/5) vote, award the contract at the amount set forth in section 22034(d) of the Public Contract Code or less to the lowest responsible bidder, if it determines the cost estimate of the responsible department head was reasonable. If no bids are received, the project may be performed by city employees, by force account or negotiated contract without further complying with this section.

4. Formal Bids: The City shall follow the following formal bidding procedure for public projects greater than two hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($2200,000.00), or as specified in either section 22032(b) or section 22020 of the Public Contract Code. 120
(a) Plans and Specifications: The City Council shall adopt plans, specifications, and working details for all public projects that are formally bid. (b) Notice: A notice inviting formal bids shall be published and mailed as specified below.
(i) A notice inviting formal bids shall state the time and place for the receiving and opening of sealed bids and distinctly describe the project. (ii) The notice inviting formal bids shall be mailed to all construction trade journals specified in section 22036 of the Public Contract Code and as named by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission, at least thirty (30) calendar days before the date of opening the bids. (iii) The notice inviting formal bids shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the jurisdiction of the city, or if none exists, in a newspaper of general circulation which is circulated within the jurisdiction of the city, at least fourteen (14) calendar days before the date of opening the bids.
(iv) In addition to notice required by this section, the public agency may give such other notice as it deems proper.

Section 4 - Severability.

If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

Section 5. CEQA Compliance.

The adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, based on 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15061(b)(3), where, as the case here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; and Section 15060(c ) (3)- the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378.

Section 6. Effective Date.

This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days following a second reading hereof. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days following passage, this Ordinance shall be published once with the names of the members of the City Council members voting for or against the ordinance in a newspaper of general circulation in Soledad.

This ordinance was introduced and read on the 21st day of May, 2025 and was finally adopted on the ___ day of June 2020, by the following vote:
121
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
Anna M. Velazquez, Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Megan Hunter, City Clerk
122
SUBJECT: In-Lieu Housing Plan for a Portion of the Affordable Units in the Miravale Parcel E – Santa Clara Subdivision
TO: Honorable Mayor Anna Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Beatriz Trujillo, Community and Economic Development Director MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025

CITY OF SOLEDAD

STAFF REPORT
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Soledad review the in-lieu plan outlined in this staff report and provide direction to staff on whether to proceed with preparing the necessary amendment to the Affordable Housing Agreement, along with any other documents required to implement the proposed modification.

Executive Summary
The Miravale Parcel E project, approved in 2019 as a Planned Unit Development, was originally conditioned to provide 52 affordable housing units, including 24 moderate-income ownership units and 28 low- and very low-income rental units. In 2023, the City Council approved a First Amendment to the Affordable Housing Agreement allowing the rental component to be transferred to Eden Housing, which secured a Density Bonus to increase the affordable rental units from 28 to 39, plus one manager’s unit, all with 55-year affordability terms.

Despite this progress, the developer, HMBY, LP, has encountered difficulties securing a homebuilder for the 24 required moderate-income ownership units. In response, the developer is proposing an in-lieu plan that would reduce the moderate-income requirement from 24 to 1 unit (with a 45-year term), and instead provide:
15,950 square feet development land dedicated to the City, and $300,000 in in-lieu fees to support future affordable housing development.

This proposal is allowed under the Soledad Municipal Code and has received support from the City’s Affordable Housing Ad-Hoc Subcommittee. Staff recommends that the City Council review and consider the in-lieu plan, which gives the City greater control over a developable parcel and the opportunity to apply a Density Bonus to potentially produce more than 12 affordable units, exceeding the original requirement. The proposal does not impact the City’s General Fund, and the in-lieu fees will be deposited into the City’s Affordable Housing Fund to support future projects. 123
Background
As outlined in Soledad Municipal Code Section 17.38.230, Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) are intended to promote efficient land use by encouraging high-quality site planning and offering flexibility from standard development regulations. The PUD framework allows for creative and integrated design solutions that include superior design features and community amenities.

On March 6, 2019, the City Council approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) 2018-02 and the Vesting Tentative Map for the Miravale Parcel E project through Resolution No. 5482. The approval authorized the development of 132 residential units on an 8.56-acre parcel owned by HMBY, LP. The project included 104 single-family townhomes—comprised of 80 market-rate and 24 moderate-income for-sale units—and 28 rental units designated for low- and very low-income households.

As a condition of approval, the developer entered into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City of Soledad, committing to provide a total of 52 affordable units: 24 moderate-income ownership units and 28 low- and very low-income rental units. The Agreement required the moderate-income units to be evenly distributed among the market-rate units and the rental units to be proportionally divided between low- and very low-income categories.

On December 13, 2023, the City Council approved the First Amendment to the Affordable Housing Agreement, which authorized HMBY, LP to partner with Eden Housing, a non-profit affordable housing developer, for the development of the multi-family rental component. Under this amendment, HMBY, LP agreed to transfer the development-ready rental parcel to Eden Housing to construct affordable rental units.

Eden Housing subsequently requested a Density Bonus to increase the number of affordable rental units from 28 to 40. This increase allowed for the development of 39 deed-restricted low- and very lowincome units, plus one non-deed-restricted manager’s unit. As a result of receiving the Density Bonus, the multi-family component became subject to a 55-year affordability term.

While the partnership with Eden Housing has resulted in a greater number of low- and very lowincome units, HMBY, LP remains responsible for producing the 24 moderate-income ownership units.

The developer has actively pursued a builder to construct these moderate-income single-family homes; however, these units have presented significant challenges during negotiations with potential building partners.

On January 28, 2025, HMBY, LP presented an in-lieu proposal to the City’s Affordable Housing AdHoc Subcommittee. The proposal included a combination of land dedication and payment of in-lieu fees in exchange for reducing the number of required moderate-income units. The Subcommittee supported the concept and directed City staff to work with the developer to finalize the in-lieu plan and return it to the City Council for consideration.

Review & Analysis
Soledad Municipal Code Section 17.38.230 permits developers to request an in-lieu housing plan as an alternative to meeting on-site inclusionary housing requirements. Any such request is subject to City Council consideration and approval. In addition, per Section 17.41.080 of the Municipal Code, any inlieu fees collected must be deposited into the City’s Affordable Housing Fund and used to support future affordable housing development.
124
City staff recommends that the City Council consider the following in-lieu proposal submitted by the developer of the Miravale Parcel E project.

CurrentAgreement:

The Miravale Parcel E project is subject to inclusionary housing requirements established by the City as a condition of project approval. Per the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 20% of all new housing units must be designated as affordable, with the following income and affordability breakdown:

Income Category Required Units Affordability Period
Moderate 24 0
Low 14 55 years
Very Low 14 55 years
Total 52
Parcel E's current affordable housing obligations are outlined in the Affordable Housing Agreement executed on February 5, 2020, and amended on December 13, 2023. These include:

Tenure: 104 single-family ownership units and 40 multi-family rental units Affordable Housing Units: 24 moderate-income (ownership), 20 low-income (rental), and 19 very low-income (rental)
Affordability Term: 55 years for rental units; no extended term for moderate-income ownership units beyond the initial qualified buyer
Total Units: 132
Proposed In-Lieu Plan (Attachment 1):

Mr. Agha, owner of HMBY, LP, reports that the requirement to construct 24 moderate-income ownership units has created a significant impediment in negotiations with potential homebuilders. The developer's inability to sell this property affects the overall housing production on the site. To address this challenge, Mr. Agha requests City Council's consideration of an in-lieu plan to modify the current requirement.

Under the proposed plan:

The number of required moderate-income units would be reduced from 24 to 1 unit, carrying a 45-year affordability term.

In exchange, the developer would:

Dedicate 15,950 square feet of development-ready land and an access easement (see Attachment 1) on Parcel B, also owned by HMBY, LP, located on Orchard Lane, to the City. Parcel B is currently undergoing the entitlement process and is expected to be entitled in 2025.

Pay $25,000 per affordable unit not built, totaling $300,000 in in-lieu fees.

As a point of reference, the City of Salinas charges an in-lieu fee of $15.15 per square foot for ownership housing. With an average unit size of approximately 1,500 square feet at Parcel E, this results in a comparable fee of about $22,725 per unit. The proposed $25,000 in-lieu fee per unit is closely aligned with this figure and reflects the estimated financial subsidy required to support the development of a moderate-income ownership unit.

The developer requests that the Council consider the additional 11 affordable rental units (39 instead of the originally required 28) as part of the overall affordable housing benefit. 125
Attachment 1 - Parcel E In-Lieu Land Proposal
Attachment 2 - Presentation
The proposed in-lieu scenario is summarized below:

Income Category Required Units Affordability Period
Moderate 1 45 years
Low 20 55 years
Very Low 19 55 years
Total 40
Staf Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council review the proposed in-lieu plan, including the land dedication and in-lieu fee payment, and provide direction on whether to approve the plan as an acceptable alternative to the original moderate-income housing requirement. The proposed dedication of 15,950 square feet of land offers the City a unique opportunity to maintain direct control over a developable parcel. This control enhances the City's ability to strategically plan for future affordable housing production. Moreover, by owning the land, the City could pursue a Density Bonus, which may allow for the development of more than 12 affordable units, thereby exceeding the number of affordable units originally required. If the Council supports the proposed in-lieu plan, staff will collaborate with the City Attorney to prepare and execute the necessary amendment to the Affordable Housing Agreement for formal adoption.

Financial Considerations
The proposed amendment to the Affordable Housing Agreement will have no direct impact on the City’s General Fund. The $300,000 in-lieu fee to be collected from the developer will be deposited into the City’s Affordable Housing Fund, in accordance with Section 17.41.080 of the Soledad Municipal Code. The Community and Economic Development Department will coordinate with the Legal and Finance Departments to ensure that the funds are properly accounted for and used exclusively for the development or support of affordable housing projects within the City.

Alternatives
Approve the proposed in-lieu plan and direct city staff to prepare a Second Amendment to the Affordable Housing Agreement for council consideration at a later meeting.

Modify the proposed in-lieu plan and direct city staff to prepare a Second Amendment to the Affordable Housing Agreement for council consideration at a later meeting.

Do not approve the proposed in-lieu plan and provide further direction to city staff.

Planning/CEQA
Not applicable
Public Notice Requirements
None required.

Attachment(s):
126
127
City of Soledad Attachment 1
Community and Economic Development – Planning Division

Miravale II Parcel E – Santa Clara Subdivision Site Plan Currently entitled with 40 Multi-Family Units = 39 Low and Very low Income deed-restricted units, 1 manager's unit Currently entitled with 104 Single-Family Units = 24 Units are non-deed restricted at a Moderate Income 128
City of Soledad Attachment 1
Community and Economic Development – Planning Division

Miravale II Parcel B – In-Lieu Proposal
15,950 Square Feet of Land in New Development Project
129
City of Soledad Attachment 1
Community and Economic Development – Planning Division

Miravale II Parcel B – In-Lieu Proposal
This property is proposed to be two (2) Multi-Family Buildings with eight (8) units each (16 total), ranging from 2-3 bedroom units.
130
Parcel E In-Lieu Plan
Proposal
Community and Economic
Development Department
May 21, 2025
131
Project Background
Project: Miravale Parcel E –
PUD approved in 2019
Original Requirement:
52 affordable units
• 24 Moderate-Income
Ownership
• 28 Low & Very Low-Income
Rentals
2023 Amendment:
• Rental portion transferred to
Eden Housing
• Increased rental units to 39
+ 1 manager’s unit (55-year
affordability)
132
Affordable Housing Agreement & In-Lieu Plan
Current Affordable Housing Requirements
Income
Category
Required Units Affordability
Period
Moderate 24 0
Low 14 55 years
Very Low 14 55 years
Total 52
Proposed Changes
In-Lieu Plan
Income
Category
Required Units Affordability
Period
Moderate 1 45 years
Low 20 55 years
Very Low 19 55 years
Total 40
133
In
-Lieu Plan
Land Dedication: 15,950 sq ft
of developable land on Parcel B
(Orchard Lane)
In-Lieu Fee: $300,000 ($25,000
per unit not built)
The developer requests that
the Council consider the
additional 11 affordable rental
units (39 instead of the
originally required 28) as part
of the overall affordable
housing benefit.
134
Reasons to
Consider an
In-Lieu Plan
Developer Constraints:

HMBY, LP has been actively seeking to sell the property, but the requirement to construct 24 moderate-income ownership units has become a significant barrier to finalizing a deal with a reputable homebuilder.

Regional Market Pressure:

As a smaller city, Soledad faces difficulty attracting builders for limited-scale moderate-income projects, especially in contrast to nearby Salinas, which is advancing its Future Growth Area development.

Builder Preference:

Larger jurisdictions like Salinas can offer more lucrative and scalable opportunities, making smaller, standalone projects in Soledad less competitive in the current housing market.

Greater Control Over Affordable Housing Development:

The current Affordable Housing Agreement does not impose long-term deed restrictions on the moderate-income ownership units Land dedication gives the City direct ownership of a developable parcel In-lieu fees to fill financing gaps
135
Code Compliance & Financial Consideration
Municipal Code
Section 17.38.230 allows in-lieu alternatives subject to City Council approval Section 17.41.080: Fees shall be deposited into the Affordable Housing Fund Financial Consideration
• No impact on General Fund
• $300,000 goes to Affordable Housing Fund
• City retains land for future affordable housing projects 136
Discussion
Approve proposed plan, direct staff to prepare amendment Modify plan, direct staff accordingly
Reject proposal, provide alternate direction
137
Comments and
Questions
138
SUBJECT: 1. Resolution No. 6231 “Adopting The Proposed Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration And Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for The Proposed Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project (Project) and Direct Staff to File A CEQA Notice Of Determination”; and

2. Resolution No. 6232 “Approving a Construction Services Contract with Specialty Construction, Inc. (In The Not-To-Exceed Amount of $13,780,764.80 for the Construction ff the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute said Contract on Behalf of the City of Soledad, and Concurrently Approving a Construction Services Contract Change Order with Specialty Construction, Inc. in the Deductive Amount of a -$1,504,419.05 for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project for a Net Contract Approval Amount of $12,276,345.75, Plus a $650,000 Construction Contingency for a Total Not To Exceed Amount of $12,926,345.75 ”; and

3. Resolution No. 6233 “Approving A Consulting Services Agreement with the Wallace Group in the Not-To-Exceed Amount of $1,232,864” for Construction Management & Inspection Services for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, and Authorizing The City Manager to Execute the Agreement on Behalf of the City of Soledad”.

TO: Honorable Mayor Velazquez and City Council
FROM: Donald Wilcox, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: May 21, 2025

CITY OF SOLEDAD

STAFF REPORT
THROUGH: Megan Hunter, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.

Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Soledad consider and adopt Resolutions:

1. No.6231 “Adopting the Proposed Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project (Project) and Direct Staff to File a CEQA Notice of Determination”; and

2. No.6232 “Approving a Construction Services Contract with Specialty Construction, Inc. (in the 139
Not-to-exceed Amount of $13,780,764.80 for the Construction of the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute said Contract on Behalf of the City of Soledad, and Concurrently Approving a Construction Services Contract Change Order with Specialty Construction, Inc. in the Deductive Amount of -$1,504,419.05 for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project for a Net Contract Approval Amount of $12,276,345.75, plus a $650,000 Construction Contingency for a Total Not to exceed Amount of $12,926,345.75 ”; and

3. No.6233 “Approving a Consulting Services Agreement with The Wallace Group in the not-toexceed Amount of $1,232,864” for Construction Management & Inspection Services for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement on Behalf of the City of Soledad”.

Executive Summary
On January 31, 2023, Soledad received an Award Notification from the CA Department of Water Resources in the amount of $16,663,021 for Soledad’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project as part of the Urban Community Drought Relief Grant Program to fund all phases of a distribution system for recycled water to be utilized for irrigation of turf at most parks and schools throughout Soledad. The Project was put out to bid and bids were opened March 27, 2025. Even though the low bid of $13,780,764.80 was less than the engineer’s estimate of $17,764,621 for the Project, it was higher than the grant funding available for construction. Therefore, staff have negotiated a deductive change order in the amount of -$1,504,419.05 with the low-bidder, Specialty Construction, Inc., for a total construction cost of $12,276,345.75. Additionally, because of the complexity, size and duration of the Project, the City sought construction management services via a Request for Qualifications for Construction Management and Inspection Services, and the selection panel was unanimous in selecting and recommending approval of a contract for services with the Wallace Group in the not-to-exceed amount of $1,232,864, 10% of the construction cost. Staff is seeking Council approval of the Specialty Construction, Inc. Contract, the Deductive Change Order, and the Construction Management Agreement with the Wallace Group. The environmental impacts of the Proposed Project have been analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, with an ultimate determination that upon adoption of appropriate mitigation measures, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project has been prepared for Council approval.

Background
The City has long strived to complete and utilize a recycled water utility system enterprise as reflected in the series of documents and actions described below.

In December 2005, the City of Soledad City Council adopted the City’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). One of the major components of the UWMP was an emphasis on preserving the groundwater resource of the City. One of the methods to accomplish this was identified as maximization of the use of recycled water.

In May 2006, the City of Soledad City Council accepted the City’s Long-Term Wastewater Management Plan (LTWMP). This plan detailed the wastewater improvements needed to serve the build-out of the 2005 General Plan. The plan included wastewater treatment upgrades that would produce Title 22 quality water that could be utilized as recycled water.

On August 2, 2006, the City of Soledad City Council approved the award of a design and construction engineering contract to Black & Veatch for implementation of the LTWMP first phase. One of the tasks 140
in the contract included the preparation of a new Report of Waste Discharge (permit application) for the project. One of the requisite elements for the permit was the adoption of a Recycled Water Ordinance.

On May 16, 2007, the Council approved Ordinance No. 645, “Adding New Chapter 13.11, ‘Recycled Water Service’to Title 13-Public Services of the Soledad Municipal Code”.

In 2008, Soledad began construction of a Title 22 Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) and completed it in 2010 for a total cost of over $60,000,000. The WRF was designed and constructed to treat to higher water quality standards than the old pond system WWTP in order to qualify for the effluent to be used for landscape irrigation and not degrade the river water quality. The new WRF construction included plans for a pipeline to take RW from the new WRF to the City. While funding was insufficient to complete that pipeline project, a pipeline was constructed all the way across an adjacent farm field from the WRF to the RR tracks.

On September 19, 2011, the Water Resources Board notified the City of a Prop 84 Grant award for the Soledad pipeline project in the amount of $1,155,000. Soledad’s project included the design and construction of the remaining sections of RW mains needed to connect the WRF to Veteran’s Park. The pipeline project was completed in 2017; however, there were several components that needed to be completed prior to the actual use of recycled water in a City park:

Permitting for the use of recycled water in public parks Conversion of the irrigation system at Veteran’s Park to recycled water to include:

Separation of the existing Veteran’s Park water system so that the restroom facility would stay on potable water and the landscape irrigation separated to use recycled water Conversion to purple valves, boxes, sprinkler heads, and warning signs installed indicating recycled water use
The above tasks, except for permitting, were completed in the summer of 2024, and permitting is in the final stages and will be complete prior to startup of this project.

In April 2015, the City completed a Recycled Water Master Plan that identified the infrastructure needed to distribute recycled water to all City Parks and School Ballfields (see attachment).

On Nov 16, 2022, the Council authorized staff to submit an application for an Urban Community Drought Relief (UCDR) Grant from the CA Department of Water Resources for Soledad’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project (the “RW Project”) to fund all phases of a distribution system for RW to be utilized for irrigation of turf at most parks and schools throughout Soledad. Soledad Unified School District (SUSD) provided a letter of support for the grant demonstrating collaboration with the City for the project which would benefit SUSD as well as the City. Collaboration with another agency helped the City’s UCDR score points toward award of the UCDR.

Subsequently, on January 31, 2023, Soledad received an Award Notification from the CA Department of Water Resources in the amount of $16,663,021 for RW Project as part of the Urban Community Drought Relief Grant Program. On April 26, 2023, the City of Soledad entered into Grant Agreement #4600015016 with the State of CA for a UCDR Grant, with a project completion date of December 4, 2025.

On October 23, 2024, Soledad City Council adopted Resolution 6167 approving a “Memorandum of Understanding” between the City and SUSD for the sale, purchase and delivery of recycled water, and on December 16, 2024, the SUSD Board of Trustees also approved the recycled water agreement.

On March 7, 2025, the State of California, Department of Water Resources, issued Amendment 1 to Grant Agreement #4600015016 extending the project construction completion date to December 31, 141
2026, and no funds can be requested after March 31, 2027.

Review & Analysis

1. Recycled Water Conveyance Project Construction.

Turf irrigation is typically one of the highest uses of water that a city experiences and is therefore a great candidate for conversion from potable to recycled water as the irrigation source. Soledad parks and schools use up to 231 acre feet per year (75 million gallons) for turf irrigation alone. Parks and Schools irrigation conversion from potable to recycled water requires complex design and construction of over five miles of new pipeline along with a pump station and other separate water system elements, and approximately 1.5 years to construct and a very large funding budget.

The proposed RW Project generally includes constructing a new recycled water booster pump station and associated facilities, approximately five miles of 4-inch diameter to 12-inch diameter pressurized recycled water pipeline and appurtenances and retrofitting landscape irrigation systems at approximately twenty schools and parks within the City.

All construction will occur within previously disturbed public rights of way and easements. The Project will be constructed within existing City Streets and developed parcels including Soledad Unified School District school campuses and City of Soledad parks, and one new pipeline will be constructed within an existing easement across active farm fields between the City proper to the City island where the City’s WRF is located. That easement was previously created for a sanitary sewer line to serve the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, an existing City recycled water pipeline and an abandoned sanitary sewer line that formerly served Dole Fresh Vegetables.

On February 20, 2025, Soledad issued a Notice for Bids through PlanetBids for the City’s RW Project with a bid due date of March 27, 2025 and an engineer’s estimate of probable construction costs of $17,764,621. Three bids were received:
$13,780,764.80 Specialty Construction, Inc.
$14,686,755.40 Monterey Peninsula Engineering
$14,920,101.00 Sierra Construction & Excavation, Inc.

Staff reviewed the bid proposals and determined that Specialty Construction, Inc. (SCI) was a responsive and responsible bidder. SCI’s bid came in lower than the Engineer’s Estimate of $17,764,62, however, the bid exceeded the available construction budget. As such, the City and SCI negotiated a deductive change order that will reduce the scope of work as well as a value engineering deduction that will allow the City to go forward with the completion of roughly 90% of the Project within the available construction budget and still maintain the minimum recycled water offset required by the grant. This also includes a slight reduction of fourteen calendar construction days and enables completion of construction by the grant end date.

The initial scope of work included new pipelines to all city parks and schools and the associated work necessary to convert irrigation systems from potable to recycled water. The reduced scope removed some parks and schools with smaller turf areas where the cost of piping to those locations had the least benefit.

Staff notes that the low bid also came in significantly lower than the engineer’s estimate, due in part to bidding a large public works project in February within a very good “bidding climate” when contractors are eager to secure work for the spring through fall traditional construction season. 142
Therefore, Staff is recommending approval of a contract with SCI for construction services for a total amount not to exceed of $13,780,764.80 (plus $650,000 contingency) concurrently with a deductive change order in the amount of -$1,504,419.05 for a net total cost of $12,276,345.75 for the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project. The City’s standard contract and change order forms will be used.

2. Construction Management
Highly competent Construction Management of a project of this complexity, size and duration are paramount to the success of the project. As such, on January 10, 2025, the City advertised on Planet Bids and in the Salinas Tribune a Request for Qualifications for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the City’s RW Project, with a due date of January 24, 2025. The RFQ included a detailed Scope of Work of the services the City will require for the entirety of this project, including full-time construction management including inspections for a 536-day project and over five miles of new pipelines trenched through existing city streets.

The City received four proposals from well-qualified firms. A four-member selection panel was assembled with internal and external members. Three RFQ proposals were deemed responsive; and, using the criteria established as advertised in the RFQ, the selection panel was unanimous in selecting Wallace Group.

Staff have met with the Wallace Group to discuss their fee estimate, which is based on their anticipated level of effort expended as necessary to complete the project scope of work on a time and materials basis (not lump sum or fixed cost fees). After review and discussion, Wallace Group submitted a fee estimate of $1.47 million. Staff negotiated with Wallace to reduce their fee estimate to no more than 10% of the construction cost initially, with a budget review at 50% of project completion.

Therefore, Staff recommends approval of a Consulting Services Agreement with The Wallace Group for construction management services for a total amount not to exceed of $1,232,864 for the Soledad RW Project. The City’s standard agreement form will be used.

3. CEQA
On November 15, 2023, the Council authorized Resolution No. 6021 with Carollo Engineers in part to prepare CEQA compliance documents for the RW Project.

The environmental impacts of the RW Project have been analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Study was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the Project. Based upon review of the Initial Study, it can be determined that the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the mitigation measures outlined in the proposed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been included in the Project (see attached Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration). The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were routed to responsible agencies, posted on the City’s website, and made available for review at City Hall. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was received by the State Clearinghouse (SCH# 2025010539) and the deadline for public review was February 21, 2025 at 5:00 PM. Action on the environmental document precedes any action on the land use entitlements for this Project.

Comment letters were received from several Native American tribes concerning the possibility of 143
impacts on cultural or historic sensitivity and burial sites. Although it was determined that there were no observed or recorded archaeological sites in the Project area, the possibility of unrecorded sites warranted the imposition of mitigation measures meant to establish procedures for identifying and properly handling previously unrecorded archaeological resources. Implementation of such mitigation measures will assist the City to ensure that the project has a less than significant impact on Tribal cultural resources.

The City also received a letter from Caltrans requesting that the City follow the Caltrans process for an encroachment permit for any work performed within Caltrans and be done in accordance with Caltrans engineering and environmental standards and at no cost to the State. The Project does not include any work within Caltrans jurisdiction.

Staff is recommending that the Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program based on the findings set forth in the attached Resolution. The IS/MND document can be found at this link:

Summary
The objective of Soledad’s Recycled Water Conveyance Project is to replace up to 165 acre-feet (fiftyfour million gallons) per year of groundwater pumping with recycled water to offset the use of potable water to irrigate sports fields as a commonsense way to reduce groundwater use. The RW Project is the first public recycled water project in the region, similar to Soledad’s wind turbine that was the first of its kind in the region as well. In addition to the use of recycled water being a sustainable solution for turf irrigation as opposed to pumping groundwater for use as turf irrigation, recycled water can continue to be used for turf irrigation if and when Soledad may experience future extended drought periods. So even when drought conditions trigger water conservation stages that prohibit irrigation of turf at schools and parks with potable ground water, irrigation with recycled water can be continued.

The next steps for this project are:

Complete the City’s Recycled Water and Title 22 permit updates (in progress) Complete the project’s Construction Phase
Complete a Prop 218 Compliant RW Rate Study
Financial Considerations
On April 26, 2023, the City of Soledad entered into Grant Agreement #4600015016 with the State of CA for a UCDR Grant in the amount of $16,663,021. The recommended contract awards will be charged to the grant and are 100% reimbursable. A City match in the amount of $1,186,126 was listed in the grant application and was budgeted in the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget but was not required in the final grant agreement and not included in the current FY 2024-25 adopted budget. Staff will make a recommendation at a later date that the Council authorize a similar amount in the FY 2025-26 budget in order to complete the elements of the project removed due to a budget shortfall to complete those elements now with the main project.

The design, construction and construction management of the Main Street Sewer Project, CIP # S09, that is also included in this recycled water project as a cost savings to both projects when done together, is being funded from the City’s sewer fund 310-0000-57000.

Alternatives
Approve the resolution(s) as presented; or
144
Resolution No. 6231 - CEQA
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 6231
Resolution No. 6232 - Construction
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 6232
Exhibit B to Resolution No. 6232
Resolution No. 6233 - CM
Exhibit A to Resolution No. 6233
Approve the resolution(s) with modifications
Do not approve the Resolution(s). This is not recommended, given the size and strict timeline of the grant
Planning/CEQA
See discussion above. The IS/MND for the RW Project is under consideration as a part of this agenda item. Upon approval, a Notice of Determination (NOD) will be sent to the State Office of Planning and Research.

Public Notice Requirements
These actions will be noticed as required as an Agenda Item for a Regular Meeting of the City of Soledad City Council.

Attachment(s):
145
RESOLUTION NO. 6231

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOLEDAD ADOPTING

THE PROPOSED INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PROPOSED

SOLEDAD RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT (PROJECT) AND

DIRECT STAFF TO FILE A CEQA NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
WHEREAS, the City of Soledad proposes to implement the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project; and
WHEREAS, the Project generally includes constructing a new recycled water booster pump station and associated facilities, approximately five miles of 4-inch diameter to 12-inch diameter pressurized recycled water pipeline and appurtenances and retrofitting landscape irrigation systems at approximately twenty schools and parks within the City; and WHEREAS, all construction will occur within previously disturbed public rights- of- way and easements. The Project will be constructed within existing City Streets and developed parcels including Soledad Unified School District school campuses and City of Soledad parks, and one new pipeline will be constructed within an existing easement across active farm fields between the City proper to the City island where the City’s WRF is located; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the CEQA Guidelines and City of Soledad CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2023, the Council authorized Resolution No. 6021 with Carollo Engineers to prepare CEQA compliance documents and for the Design and construction of a Title 22 recycled wastewater city-wide distribution system; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Project, and found that the Proposed Project would not have a significant effect on the environment because specified mitigation measures had been incorporated into the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the City gave public notice of the Initial Study and of its intention to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, including a 30-day public review period which ended February 21, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City received letters from Caltrans and the following tribes: the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of San Juan Bautista and the Salinas Tribe; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were received by the State Clearinghouse (SCH# 2025010539) and the deadline for public review was February 21, 2025 at 5:00 PM.
146
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City finds on the basis of the whole record, including the Initial Study, staff report, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, a copy of which attached as “Exhibit A” and by reference incorporated herein, that there is no substantial evidence that the Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project; will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis; and
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Soledad at a regular meeting duly held on the 21st day of May, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers: None
ABSENT, Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers: None
ANNA M. VELAZQUEZ, Mayor
ATTEST:

MEGAN HUNTER, City Clerk
147
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Public Review Draft IS/MND
Exhibit A
148
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
for the
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project
Prepared for:

City of Soledad
Prepared by:

Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.

January 2025
149
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
150
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project i Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction and Project Description.......................................................................................... 1

1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................ 2

1.3 Project Location ......................................................................................................................... 6

1.4 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting........................................................................................... 6

1.5 Proposed Project........................................................................................................................ 6

1.6 Project Construction ................................................................................................................ 18

1.7 Operations and Maintenance .................................................................................................. 20

1.8 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required ............................................................... 20 Chapter 2. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ............................................................................. 21 Chapter 3. Determination........................................................................................................................... 23 Chapter 4. Environmental Setting and Impacts.......................................................................................... 25

4.1. Aesthetics................................................................................................................................ 27

4.2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources....................................................................................... 31

4.3. Air Quality ............................................................................................................................... 35

4.4. Biological Resources................................................................................................................ 45

4.5. Cultural Resources.................................................................................................................. 59

4.6. Energy ..................................................................................................................................... 65

4.7. Geology and Soils.................................................................................................................... 67

4.8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions..................................................................................................... 73

4.9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .......................................................................................... 80

4.10. Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................... 86

4.11. Land Use and Planning.......................................................................................................... 91

4.12. Noise ..................................................................................................................................... 94

4.13. Population and Housing...................................................................................................... 102

4.14. Public Services..................................................................................................................... 103

4.15. Recreation........................................................................................................................... 107

4.16. Transportation .................................................................................................................... 108

4.17. Tribal Cultural Resources.................................................................................................... 112

4.18. Utilities and Service Systems .............................................................................................. 116

4.19. Wildfire ............................................................................................................................... 120

4.20. Mandatory Findings of Significance.................................................................................... 124 Chapter 5. List of Preparers and References ............................................................................................ 127 List of Figures
Figure 1. Regional Map ................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Vicinity Map ................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3. Existing Facilities ............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 4a. Site Photos ................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4b. Site Photos................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 4c. Site Photos.................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 4d. Site Photos................................................................................................................................. 10 Figure 4e. Site Photos ................................................................................................................................. 11 Figure 5. Land Use Map .............................................................................................................................. 12 Figure 6. Proposed Project Components.................................................................................................... 14 151
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project ii Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Figure 7a. Site Plan...................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 7b. Site Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 8. Project Service Locations............................................................................................................. 17 Figure 9. Important Farmland Map............................................................................................................. 33 Figure 10. Habitat Map – Agricultural......................................................................................................... 47 Figure 11. Habitat Map – Developed.......................................................................................................... 48 List of Tables
Table 1. Attainment Status for the NCCAB ................................................................................................. 36 Table 2. Thresholds of Significance for Construction Emissions................................................................. 36 Table 3. Thresholds of Significance for Operational Emissions.................................................................. 36 Table 4. Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards................................................................................. 38 Table 5. Construction Air Quality Emissions............................................................................................... 42 Table 6. Amortized Construction GHG Emissions....................................................................................... 78 Table 7 Annual Operation GHG Emissions - Unmitigated........................................................................... 78 Table 8. Land Use Designations .................................................................................................................. 92 Table 9. Definitions of Acoustical Terms Used in this Report..................................................................... 95 Table 10. Interior and Exterior Noise Standards......................................................................................... 97 Table 11. Construction Equipment Noise Emission Levels......................................................................... 99 Table 11. Vibration Velocities for Construction Equipment ..................................................................... 101 Appendices
Appendix A. Basis of Design Report
Appendix B. Pipeline Segment Plans – 30 Percent Design Plans Appendix C. Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Impact Assessment Appendix D. Biological Resources Report
Appendix E. Geotechnical Report
152
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project iii Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Project Summary

1. Project Title: Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project (“Proposed Project”)

2. Lead Agency: City of Soledad

3. Contact: Don Wilcox, Public Works Director/City Engineer 248 Main Street, Soledad, CA 93960
(831) 223-5124
[email protected]

4. Prepared By: Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc (“DD&A”)

5. Date Prepared: January 2025

6. Project Location: City of Soledad, Monterey County, California

7. Name of Property Owner/Project Proponent: City of Soledad

8. Project Location: City of Soledad, in Monterey County, California

9. Assessor’s Parcel Number(s): 257-082-018, 257-082-020, 257-082-010, 257-082-011, 257-082-012, 257-082-013, and City Rights-of-Way

10. Project Area of Disturbance: Three and a half (3.5) acres

11. Project Description: Installation and operation of Title 22 recycled water conveyance infrastructure from the City’s existing WRF to up to 20 parks and schools throughout the City.

12. General Plan Designation: Public/Institutional, Agricultural, Recreational

13. Zoning District: PF – Public Facility
153
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project iv Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
154
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 1 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Chapter 1. Introduction and Project Description

1.1 INTRODUCTION
This Initial Study has been prepared to evaluate the potential environmental effects associated with the City of Soledad (“City”) Recycled Water Conveyance Project (“Project” or “Proposed Project”), located in the City of Soledad in Monterey County, California. This document has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code §21000 et. seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations (“CCR”) §15000 et. seq.

An Initial Study is an informational document prepared by a Lead Agency to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines §15063, subd. (a)). If there is substantial evidence that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) must be prepared, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15064(a). However, if the Lead Agency determines that revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant to mitigate the potentially significant effects to a less than significant level, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) may be prepared instead of an EIR (CEQA Guidelines §15070, subd. (b)). Per CEQA Guidelines for an IS/MND, a Lead Agency prepares a written statement describing the reasons a proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, why an EIR need not be prepared. This IS/MND conforms to the content requirements under CEQA Guidelines §15071.

The City is acting as the Lead Agency pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15050(a). As the Lead Agency, the City has prepared this IS/MND pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15063, §15070, and §15152 as the project does have some significant impacts on the environment that can be mitigated to less than significant with identified measures. This IS/MND will be circulated for agency and public review during a 30-day public review period pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15073. Comments received by the City on this IS/MND will be reviewed and considered as part of the deliberative process in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15074.

Publication of this IS/MND marks the beginning of a 30-day public review and comment period. During this period, the IS/MND will be available to local, state, and federal agencies and to interested organizations and individuals for review. Written comments concerning the environmental review contained in this IS/MND during the 30-day public review period should be sent to:

Don Wilcox, Director of Public Works
248 Main Street, Soledad, CA 93960
(831) 223-5124
[email protected]
This IS/MND and all documents referenced in it are available for public review at the City’s Public Works Department at the above address. Following the conclusion of the public review period, the City will consider the adoption of the IS/MND for the Proposed Project at a regularly scheduled public hearing.

The City shall consider the IS/MND together with any comments received during the public review process. Upon adoption of the IS/MND, the City may proceed with approval actions for the Proposed Project. If the City approves the Project, the City will file a Notice of Determination (“NOD”), which will be available for public inspection and posted in 24 hours of receipt at the County Clerk’s Office for 30 155
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 2 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
days. The filing of the NOD starts a 30-day statute of limitations on court challenges to the approval under CEQA (CEQA Guidelines Section 15075(g)).

The City prepared the following section consistent with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15124 to the extent that it applies to the Proposed Project. Additionally, the information contained in this section has also been prepared to satisfy the applicable CEQA Plus requirements. The following section provides a discussion of key background details related to the Proposed Project, including project components, site and area characteristics, and applicable regulatory requirements.

1.2 BACKGROUND
The City retained Carollo Engineers, Inc. (“Carollo”) to develop preliminary and final design documents for the Recycled Water Conveyance Project. The Project is being funded by the Department of Water Resources (“DWR”) under the Urban Community Drought Relief (“UCDR”) Grant and is subjected to the terms and conditions set forth in the Grant Agreement between the State of California DWR and the City (Agreement No. 4600015016, UCDR Grant). A Basis of Design Report (“BODR”) prepared by Carollo (May 2024) described existing site conditions, existing and proposed system components, design criteria, and included technical and engineering decisions to be used for the preparation of the final design documents for the Project (Appendix A). The Proposed Project is intended to provide Title 22 recycled water from the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (“WRF”) to 20 schools and parks throughout the City and is part of a larger multi-phase City water conveyance project, consisting of the following phases:
 Phase 1 (completed in 2010): Design and construction of a new 5.5 million gallons per day (“MGD”) water reclamation facility and approximately 10,200 linear feet (“LF”) of 8-inch diameter recycled water transmission pipeline.
 Phase 2 (completed in 2018): Design and construction of approximately 3,800 LF of 12-inch diameter recycled water transmission pipeline to connect all the existing Phase 1 8-inch pipeline.
 Phase 3 (Project): Design and construction of a city-wide distribution system to irrigated landscaped areas within twenty City’s parks and schools. Details of the required facilities are provided below in Section 1.5, Proposed Project.
 Phase 4 (Future): New transmission pipeline to provide recycled water to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) facilities within an Incorporated City “Island” three (3) miles north of the City.

Figure 1 shows the regional location of the Project and Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the project area.

The existing facilities are shown in Figure 3. The pipeline constructed during Phases 1 and 2 is referred to as the transmission pipeline. Phases 1 and 2 were previously completed. The pipelines and associated improvements to be constructed within the City during Phase 3 are referred to as the distribution system. Phase 3 comprises the Proposed Project as analyzed in this CEQA document. Phase 4 is not included as part of the Proposed Project analyzed within this document and would require future CEQA analysis if implemented.
156
1 8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26
Regional Map Salinas Rive r Castroville Rd El Camino Real N 3 5 3
Castroville
Serra Village
Marina
Prunedale
Salinas
4411 ft
Carmel Rive
r
Tula r citos
Cre
e
k

S A N TA L U C I A R A N GE

C A R M E L

VA LL E Y
Baronet
Estates
Ambler Park
Carmel Valley
1961 ft
Posts
Big Sur
3461 ft
3156 ft
Gabil
a
n
Cre ek
nito
Rive r
Quail Creek
El Camino Real S

G A B I L A N

R A N G E
Tres Pinos
Bolsa Knolls
Gabilan Acres
Ridgemark
3551 ft
4461 ft
Sa
l
inas
River

S I E R R A D E

S A L I N A S
Gonzales
Jamesburg
Camphora
Dean
Fort Romie
Chualar
Soledad
5051 ft
Ar ro yo
S
e
c
o
Paloma Creek
Vaqueros Creek

S A N T A

L U C IA

R A N G E
M o n t e r e y
Tassajara Hot
Springs
Sycamore Flat
Millers Ranch
Santa Ana Creek
Tres
Pino
s
C
Airline Hwy

S A N T A A N A

V A L L E Y

Q U IE N S A BE V AL LE Y
3295 ft
Salinas Rive r
Harlem
Greenfield
El Camino Real
Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, Merced County Association of Gov, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA, USFWS, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS, Esri, USGS
¯
0 2.5 5 1.25 Miles Proposed Project Site Eel Sacramento Salinas SIERRA NEVADA MOUNTAINS

CA LIFORNIA
Fresno
Carson City
San Francisco
San Jose
Sacramento
Figure Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341
Date
Scale
Project
Title:
157
Maxar
¯
0 0.2 0.4 0.1 Miles
Agriculture
Agriculture
Agriculture
Residential
Residential
Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Public Facility
Public Facility
Public Facility
Residential
Proposed Facilities
Existing 12-inch Transmission Line
Existing 8-inch Transmission Line
Existing Facilities
Vicinity Map
Source: Maxar; ESRI, August 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 2
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 158
Path: E:\GIS\GIS_Projects\2024-26 Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance\2024-26 Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance\2024-26 Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance.aprx Figure
Planning and Environmental Consulting anning and Environmental Consulting DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES, ASSOCIATES, INC.

Scale
5/21/2024
Date
Existing Facilities 2
0 1,000 2,000 ¯ Feet
Existing 12-inch Transmission Line
Existing 8-inch Transmission Line
Water Reclamation
Facility
Front St
HWY 101
Gabilan Dr
Main St
Vista De Soledad
North St
Metz Rd
Entrada Dr
West St
Vista Ave
Prada Dr
Orchard Ln
Market St
East St
Palm Ave
Orchard Ln
San Antonia St
1 in = 1,183 ft
Existing Facilities
Source: Carollo Engineers, May 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 3
Figure Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341
Date
Scale
Project
Title:
159
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 6 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
The WRF is owned and operated by the City and treats wastewater from the City and CDCR facilities. It produces disinfected, tertiary treated effluent that meets Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3, California Code of Regulations (“CCR”) for recycled water. It is operating around 2.45 MGD average daily flow and the effluent is currently being discharged to rapid infiltration basins adjacent to the WRF for aquifer recharge. The current discharge permit limits recharge to 4.3 MGD with the remaining 1.2 MGD of peak flow capacity designated for non-potable reuse.

1.3 PROJECT LOCATION
The Proposed Project is located primarily within the City of Soledad in Monterey County, as shown in Figure 1, and is subject to the requirements in the City’s 2005 General Plan. The City is in the process of updating the General Plan, anticipated for adoption in 2025, but the current Project would comply with the adopted 2005 General Plan that is currently in effect. The Project would provide recycled water from the City’s WRF, located at 34520 Morisoli Road (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [“APNs”] 257-082-018, 257- 082-020, and 257-082-021) to schools and parks throughout the City. Most proposed facilities are located within the City’s WRF property and in City rights of way (“ROW”) and would not require additional property. The City has a 20-foot-wide easement for the existing transmission main running from the WRF to Front Street, which is located within farmland. This portion of the Proposed Project is located within unincorporated Monterey County and is subject to the requirements contained in the County’s 2010 General Plan. The existing easement would be reviewed during final design to determine if additional permanent and temporary easements are required. Regional access to the Project area is provided from U.S. 101 (“Highway 101”) and State Route 146 (“SR 146”). Local access to the Project area is provided by roadways throughout the City. Access to the WRF is provided via Morisoli Road to a onehalf mile driveway connecting Morisoli Road to the WRF main gate. Figures 4a through 4e shows site photos of the Project area.

1.4 SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING
The Project site is surrounded by residential, commercial, public facilities (i.e., parks and schools), and agricultural land uses. Residential uses surrounding the Project primarily consist of single-family residences and multi-family residences. Commercial use surrounding the Proposed Project primarily comprises retail businesses and a segment of general commercial area along Front Street and Highway 101. Figure 5 shows the land uses within the Project area.

1.5 PROPOSED PROJECT
The Proposed Project consists of installing and operating infrastructure necessary to convey Title 22 recycled water from the City’s WRF to up to 20 parks and schools throughout the City. The Project includes the construction of a booster pump facility, distribution piping system, and appurtenances, new or converted irrigation systems, and cross-connection prevention assemblies, as well as construction management, environmental work, planning, and design. The expansion would replace a minimum of 165 acre-feet (54 million gallons) per year of groundwater pumping with recycled water to offset the use of potable water to irrigate sports fields and reduce groundwater use. 160
4a
Photo #1: West facing view of Aurelio N. Ramirez Park from Munras Street (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #2: Northeast facing view of Bill Ramus Park from Monterey Street (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #3: North facing view of Blas Santana Park from
Gabilan Drive (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #4: North facing view of Toledo Park from Gabilan Drive (Source: Google, 2024).
8/19/2024
N/A
2024.26
Site Photos
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 161
4b
Photo #1: North facing view of Jesse Gallardo Park from Metz Road/ State Route 146 (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #2: Northwest facing view of Joe Ledesma Park from Market Street (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #3: Northwest facing view of Little League Park from Andalucia Drive (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #4: Southeast facing view of Lum Park from Terraza Street (Source: Google, 2024).
8/19/2024
N/A
2024.26
Site Photos
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 162
4c
Photo #1: East facing view of Orchard Lane Park from Orchard Lane (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #2: North facing view of Peverini Park from Vida Street (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #3: South facing view of San Antonio Park from La Colina Street (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #4: Northwest facing view of Santa Barbara Park from Santa Barbara Road (Source: Google, 2024).
8/19/2024
N/A
2024.26
Site Photos
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 163
4d
Photo #1: North facing view of Veterans Park from Gabilan Drive (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #2: West facing view of Vosti Park from Monterey Street (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #3: West facing view of Frank Ledesma Elementary School from Vista De Soledad (Source: Google, 2024)
Photo #4: North facing view of Gabilan Elementary School from Metz Road/State Route 146 (Source: Google, 2024).
8/19/2024
N/A
2024.26
Site Photos
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 164
4e
Photo #1: Southwest facing view of Jack Franscioni Elementary School from San Antonio Street (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #2: Southeast facing view of Rose Ferrero Elementary School from Entrada Drive (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #3: East facing view of Soledad High School from
West Street (Source: Google, 2024).

Photo #4: West facing view of Soledad Middle School from Main Street (Source: Google, 2024).
8/19/2024
N/A
2024.26
Site Photos
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 165
Maxar
¯
0 0.25 0.5 0.13 Miles
Rivers and Water Bodies
Residential - Low Density
Public/Quasi-Public
Industrial
Farmlands 40 - 160 Ac Min
Commercial
Agricultural Industrial
County Land Use
Residential High Density
Residential Medium
Residential Low
Residential Single Family
Public Facility
Open Space
Industrial
Commercial Highway
Commercial Residential
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
City of Soledad Zoning
Proposed Facilities
Existing Transmission Line
Existing Transmission Line
Land Use Map
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 5
Source: Monterey County, 2010
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 166
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 13 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
The Project would provide recycled water to the following parks and schools in the City, which are currently irrigated with potable water and/or non-potable well water:
 Lum Memorial Park
 Peverini Park
 Santa Barbara Park
 San Antonio Park
 Jack Franscioni Elementary
 Toledo Park (under development)
 Blas Santana Park
 Soledad High School
 Rose Ferrero Elementary
 Frank Ledesma Elementary
 Veterans Park
 Joe O. Ledesma Park
 Main Street Middle School
 Albert Bill Ramus Park
 Little League Park
 Jesse Gallardo Park
 San Vicente/Gabilan Elementary (one service connection)  Orchard Lane Park
 Aurelio N. Ramirez Park
 Vosti Park
Additional work on some of these park and school sites, consisting of Installing irrigation meters, disconnecting the potable water system from the irrigation system, installing irrigation piping, and replacing sprinkler heads with Title 22 compliant purple colored recycled water sprinkler heads would be required to connect the existing sites’ water systems to the recycled water distribution system. Key components of the Proposed Project are described in further detail below and are shown in Figure 6.

Figures 7a and 7b show the overall site plan for the Proposed Project and Figure 8 shows the Project Service Location.
 Recycled water pump station at the City’s WRF.
 Approximately 3,800 feet of a 12-inch diameter recycled water transmission pipeline from the WRF to Front Street. The pipeline diameter may be upsized to approximately 16 inches in diameter during final design.
 Approximately 22,700 feet of recycled water distribution pipelines ranging from 4 to 8 inches in diameter.
 Conversion or replacement of existing on-site irrigation systems to meet recycled water standards.
167
Path: E:\GIS\GIS_Projects\2024-26 Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance\2024-26 Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance\2024-26 Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance.aprx Figure
Planning and Environmental Consulting lanning and Environmental Consulting DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES, ASSOCIATES, INC.

Scale
5/21/2024
Date
Proposed Project Components 3
Front St
HWY 101
Gabilan Dr
Main St
Vista De Soledad
North St
Metz Rd
Entrada Dr
West St
Vista Ave
Prada Dr
Orchard Ln
Market St
East St
Palm Ave
Orchard Ln
San Antonia St
0 1,000 2,000 ¯ Feet
Existing 12-inch Transmission Line
Existing 8-inch Transmission Line
Proposed Distribution Pipelines
1 in = 1,183 ft
Water Reclamation
Facility
Proposed Project
Components
Source: Carollo Engineers, May 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 6
Figure Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341
Date
Scale
Project
Title:
168
Site Plan - South
Source: Carollo Engineers, June 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 7a PROJECT NO.

LAST SAVED BY:

FILE NAME:

Plot Date:

S. FOX
K. SIMPSON
J. MARSHALL

GENERAL
KEY MAP 1

ALIGNMENT A
20276500G06.dwg
KSimpson
202765-100000
9/12/2022 7:29:07 AM
SCAL
KEY PL
GENERAL NOTES:

1. PLACE TEXT

2. PLACE TEXT

3. PLACE TEXT
0 150' 300' 600'
SCALE: 1" = 300'
usanorth811.

KEY NOTES:

1. PLACE TEXT

2. PLACE TEXT

3. PLACE TEXT

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION

SCALES ACCORD

VERIFY SCA

THIS SHEET, AD

IF NOT ONE INC

BAR IS ONE INC

ORIGINAL DRA
0 JUNE 2024

CITY OF SOLEDAD

RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G 30% DESIGN SUBMITTAL
No. 73998

SUSAN NGO FOX
FILE:

PLAN

ALIGNMENT A
FILE
HIGHWAY 101

FRONT ST
00C01 00C02 00C03
00C04
00C58
00C22
00C23
00C24
00C25
00C05
00C06
00C07
00C18
00C09
00C10
00C11
00C12
00C13
00C19
00C26
00C21
00C14
00C15
00C16
00C27
00C17
00C28
00C29
00C42
00C20
00C08

FRONT ST

WEST ST

BENITO ST

ENCINA ST

MAIN ST

SOLEDAD ST

KIDDER ST

MONTEREY ST

DIXI ST

MARKET ST

PALM ST

STATE ST

PARK ST
VOSTI
PARK

ORCHARD LANE

METZ RD

ANDALLUCIA DR

WALKER DR

SAN VICENTE RD

MAIN STREET
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
ALIGNMENT A2

JOE LEDESMA
PARK

BILL RAMUS
PARK

NORTH ST

PUMP STATION
AT WRF
ALIGNMENT A1

FRONT ST
ALIGNMENT A3
NEW 8-INCH

WATER MAIN
ALIGNMENT A6
ALIGNMENT A4

ALIGNMENT A
ALIGNMENT B1

SOLEDAD ST

KIDDER ST

KIDDER ST
LITTLE
LEAGUE
PARK
JESSE

GALARDO

PARK GABILAN

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

SAN VINCENTE

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

RAMIREZ
PARK

ORCHARD

LANE PARK

TRANSMISSION
MAIN

PALM ST

EAST ST
OAK ST
OAK ST

BENITO ST

ENCINA ST

KIDDER ST

DIXI ST

EAST ST

WALKER DR

MARISOLI RD

MONTEREY ST
#

MAIN ST
UPRR

ALIGNMENT A

MARKET ST
EX 8-INCH

RECYCLED

WATER PIPELINE
EX 12-INCH

RECYCLED

WATER PIPELINE
UPRR
ALIGNMENT A5
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 169
Site Plan - North
Source: Carollo Engineers, June 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 7b
SS
ALIGNMENT B1
PROJECT NO.

LAST SAVED BY:

FILE NAME:

Plot Date:

S. FOX
K. SIMPSON
J. MARSHALL

GENERAL
KEY MAP 2

ALIGNMENT B
20276500G07.dwg
dhannasch
202765-100000
9/12/2022 7:29:07 AM

GENERAL NO

1. PLACE TEXT

2. PLACE TEXT

3. PLACE TEXT
0 150' 300' 600'
SCALE: 1" = 300'
u

KEY NOTE

1. PLACE TEXT

2. PLACE TEXT

3. PLACE TEXT

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
SC
VE
T
IF
B
O
0 JUNE 2024

CITY OF SOLEDAD

RECYCLED WATER CONVEYANCE PROJECT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G 30% DESIGN SUBMITTAL
No. 73998

SUSAN NGO FOX
FILE:

PLAN

ALIGNMENT B
FILE
00C46
00C47 00C48
00C32
00C33 00C34
00C34
00C30
00C31
00C44
00C45
00C43
00C35 00C36
00C39 00C38 00C37
00C50
00C41
00C53 00C52
00C54

ROSE FERRERO

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

SOLEDAD

HIGH SCHOOL
BLAS

SANTANA
PARK

SAN ANTONIO ST

ORCHARD LANE

JACK FRANSCIONI

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

FRANK LEDESNA

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

VETERANS
PARK

GABILAN DR

WEST ST

TOLEDO ST

VIDA ST

ENTRADA DR
SANTA

TERRAZA ST
TOLEDO
PARK

GABILAN DR
00C42
ALIGNMENT B2

ALIGNMENT B
ALIGNMENT B3
ALIGNMENT B7
ALIGNMENT B8
00C40
ALIGNMENT B6
ALIGNMENT B5
00C49
00C51
ALIGNMENT B4
ALIGNMENT B9
EX 8-INCH

RECYCLED

WATER PIPELINE
LUM

MEMORIAL
PARK

PEVERINI
PARK
SANTA

BARBARA
PARK

SANTA ANTONIO
PARK
00C55

VISTA AVE
#

SAN VINCENTE RD
00C56
00C57
00C0150

BARBARA ST

LA COLINA ST
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 170

PROJECT SITES KEY MAP
1:500 1
18 19
20 13
15 16
17 12
10 11
8 7
6 5
4 9
2 1
3 14

KEY MAP SITE LIST
Project Service Locations
Source: Carollo Engineers, June 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 8
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341

SITE SITE NAME TYPE SHEET NUMBER
1 LUM MEMORIAL PARK PARK L1 .0 / L1 .1
2 PEVERINI PARK PARK L2.0 / L2.1
3 SANTA BARBARA PARK PARK L3.0/L3.1
4 SAN ANTONIO PARK PARK L4.0 / L4.1
5 JACK FRANSCIONI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LS.0 / LS.1 - LS.4
6 TOLEDO PARK PARK L6.0 / L6.1
7 BLAS SANTANA PARK PARK L7.0 / L7.1-L7.2
8 SOLEDAD HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOL LB.0 / LB.1 • LB.8
9 ROSE FERRERO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L9.0/L9.1 - L9.4
10 FRANK LEDESMA ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL L10.1 / L10.1- L10.3 11 VETERANS PARK PARK L11 .0 / L1 1. 1
12 JOE 0 . LEDESMA PARK PARK L12.0 / L12.1
13 MAIN STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL SCHOOL L13.0 / L13.1-L13.4 14 ALBERT BILL RAMUS PARK PARK L14.0 / L14.1
15 CHESTER AAROE PARK (LITTLE LEAGUE) PARK L1 5.0/L15.1 16 JESSE GALLARDO PARK PARK L16.0 / L16.1-L16.2
17 SAN VICENTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L17.0 / L17.1 - 17.4
18 ORCHARD LANE PARK PARK L18.0 / L18.1
19 AURELIO N. RAMIREZ PARK PARK L19.0 / L19.1
20 VOSTI PARK PARK L20.0 / L20.1

PROJECT SITES KEY MAP
1:500 1
18 19
20 13
15 16
17 12
10 11
8 7
6 5
4 9
2 1
3 14

KEY MAP SITE LIST
Project Service Locations
Source: Carollo Engineers, June 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 8
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341

SITE SITE NAME TYPE SHEET NUMBER
1 LUM MEMORIAL PARK PARK L1 .0 / L1 .1
2 PEVERINI PARK PARK L2.0 / L2.1
3 SANTA BARBARA PARK PARK L3.0/L3.1
4 SAN ANTONIO PARK PARK L4.0 / L4.1
5 JACK FRANSCIONI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LS.0 / LS.1 - LS.4
6 TOLEDO PARK PARK L6.0 / L6.1
7 BLAS SANTANA PARK PARK L7.0 / L7.1-L7.2
8 SOLEDAD HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOL LB.0 / LB.1 • LB.8
9 ROSE FERRERO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L9.0/L9.1 - L9.4
10 FRANK LEDESMA ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL L10.1 / L10.1- L10.3 11 VETERANS PARK PARK L11 .0 / L1 1. 1
12 JOE 0 . LEDESMA PARK PARK L12.0 / L12.1
13 MAIN STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL SCHOOL L13.0 / L13.1-L13.4 14 ALBERT BILL RAMUS PARK PARK L14.0 / L14.1
15 CHESTER AAROE PARK (LITTLE LEAGUE) PARK L1 5.0/L15.1 16 JESSE GALLARDO PARK PARK L16.0 / L16.1-L16.2
17 SAN VICENTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L17.0 / L17.1 - 17.4
18 ORCHARD LANE PARK PARK L18.0 / L18.1
19 AURELIO N. RAMIREZ PARK PARK L19.0 / L19.1
20 VOSTI PARK PARK L20.0 / L20.1

PROJECT SITES KEY MAP
1:500 1
18 19
20 13
15 16
17 12
10 11
8 7
6 5
4 9
2 1
3 14

KEY MAP SITE LIST
Project Service Locations
Source: Carollo Engineers, June 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 8
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341

SITE SITE NAME TYPE SHEET NUMBER
1 LUM MEMORIAL PARK PARK L1 .0 / L1 .1
2 PEVERINI PARK PARK L2.0 / L2.1
3 SANTA BARBARA PARK PARK L3.0/L3.1
4 SAN ANTONIO PARK PARK L4.0 / L4.1
5 JACK FRANSCIONI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LS.0 / LS.1 - LS.4
6 TOLEDO PARK PARK L6.0 / L6.1
7 BLAS SANTANA PARK PARK L7.0 / L7.1-L7.2
8 SOLEDAD HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOL LB.0 / LB.1 • LB.8
9 ROSE FERRERO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L9.0/L9.1 - L9.4
10 FRANK LEDESMA ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL L10.1 / L10.1- L10.3 11 VETERANS PARK PARK L11 .0 / L1 1. 1
12 JOE 0 . LEDESMA PARK PARK L12.0 / L12.1
13 MAIN STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL SCHOOL L13.0 / L13.1-L13.4 14 ALBERT BILL RAMUS PARK PARK L14.0 / L14.1
15 CHESTER AAROE PARK (LITTLE LEAGUE) PARK L1 5.0/L15.1 16 JESSE GALLARDO PARK PARK L16.0 / L16.1-L16.2
17 SAN VICENTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L17.0 / L17.1 - 17.4
18 ORCHARD LANE PARK PARK L18.0 / L18.1
19 AURELIO N. RAMIREZ PARK PARK L19.0 / L19.1
20 VOSTI PARK PARK L20.0 / L20.1

PROJECT SITES KEY MAP
1:500 1
18 19
20 13
15 16
17 12
10 11
8 7
6 5
4 9
2 1
3 14

KEY MAP SITE LIST
Project Service Locations
Source: Carollo Engineers, June 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 8
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341

SITE SITE NAME TYPE SHEET NUMBER
1 LUM MEMORIAL PARK PARK L1 .0 / L1 .1
2 PEVERINI PARK PARK L2.0 / L2.1
3 SANTA BARBARA PARK PARK L3.0/L3.1
4 SAN ANTONIO PARK PARK L4.0 / L4.1
5 JACK FRANSCIONI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LS.0 / LS.1 - LS.4
6 TOLEDO PARK PARK L6.0 / L6.1
7 BLAS SANTANA PARK PARK L7.0 / L7.1-L7.2
8 SOLEDAD HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOL LB.0 / LB.1 • LB.8
9 ROSE FERRERO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L9.0/L9.1 - L9.4
10 FRANK LEDESMA ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL L10.1 / L10.1- L10.3 11 VETERANS PARK PARK L11 .0 / L1 1. 1
12 JOE 0 . LEDESMA PARK PARK L12.0 / L12.1
13 MAIN STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL SCHOOL L13.0 / L13.1-L13.4 14 ALBERT BILL RAMUS PARK PARK L14.0 / L14.1
15 CHESTER AAROE PARK (LITTLE LEAGUE) PARK L1 5.0/L15.1 16 JESSE GALLARDO PARK PARK L16.0 / L16.1-L16.2
17 SAN VICENTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L17.0 / L17.1 - 17.4
18 ORCHARD LANE PARK PARK L18.0 / L18.1
19 AURELIO N. RAMIREZ PARK PARK L19.0 / L19.1
20 VOSTI PARK PARK L20.0 / L20.1
Title:
� 12
I � � � ��
0 PROJECT SITES KEY MAP
1:500

ENTRADA
Project Service Locations
Fps:4°IE," , 1 , - , - 1 � 1 .1 ! 2 i
VIDA kl, D RIV E
s
�
�
o
�
z 1"-------=-.2
I I
8 5a
1 17 � i-------!
•8a--- � - _18 }
- - -- } -- - - -i " - - -.

Date
Scale
Project

KEY MAP SITE LIST

SITE SITE NAME

LUM MEMORIAL PARK

PEVERINI PARK

SANTA BARBARA PARK

SAN ANTONIO PARK

JACK FRANSCIONI ELEMENTARY

TOLEDO PARK

BLAS SANTANA PARK

SOLEDAD HIGH SCHOOL

ROSE FERRERO ELEMENTARY
10 FRANK LEDESMA ELEMENTARY
11 VETERANS PARK
12 JOE 0. LEDESMA PARK
13 MAIN STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL
14 ALBERT BILL RAMUS PARK
15 CHESTER AAROE PARK (LITTLE LEAGUE)
16 JESSE GALLARDO PARK
17 SAN VICENTE ELEMENTARY
18 ORCHARD LANE PARK
19 AURELIO N. RAMIREZ PARK
20 VOSTI PARK
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26

TYPE SHEET NUMBER
PARK L1.0/L1.1
PARK L2.0/L2.1
PARK L3.0 / L3.1
PARK L4.0 / L4.1
SCHOOL L5.0 /L5.1 - L5.4
PARK L6.0 / L6.1
PARK L7.0 / L7.1 L7.2
SCHOOL L8.0 /L8.1 - L8.8
SCHOOL L9.0 / L9.1 - L9.4
SCHOOL L10.1 /L10.1 -L10.3
PARK L11.0/L11.1
PARK L1 2 .0 / L12. 1
SCHOOL L13.0/L13.1 -L13.4
PARK L14.0/L14.1
PARK L15.0/L15.1
PARK L16.0/L16.1 l16.2
SCHOOL L17.0/L17.1 - 17.4
PARK L18.0/L18.1
PARK l19.0/l19.1
PARK L20.0 / L20.1
Source: Carollo En ineers June 2024
Monterey I San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341
Figure
8 171
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 18 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Recycled Water Pump Station
The pump station would be located at the City’s WRF, as shown in Figure 6. The pump station would draw recycled water from existing WRF facilities to supply the recycled water to the City’s parks and schools. The new pump station is proposed at the southeast corner of the sludge drying pond area west of the flocculation tanks. The pump station includes a below-ground wet well structure with vertical turbine pumps. The wet well feed pipe crosses several existing utilities and penetrates through two earthen berms. The discharge header penetrates one earthen berm, extends north at the access road, and continues toward a connection to the existing 12-inch recycled water transmission main. Pipe penetrations through earthen berms would be watertight and designed to maintain structural integrity of the berm.

Recycled Water Transmission Pipeline - WRF to Front Street The existing transmission pipeline is composed of 8-inch and 12-inch diameter pipes, as shown on Figure 6. The existing 8-inch transmission pipeline from the WRF to Front Street, which runs through farmland, is undersized. A new 12-inch pipeline would be constructed parallel to the existing 8-inch pipeline as part of the Project. This would tie into the existing 12-inch transmission pipeline at the WRF on the south end and the existing 12-inch transmission pipeline on the north end before the railroad crossing. Additional easements may be required for the transmission pipeline through farmland, which will be confirmed during final design. In addition, construction work restrictions may include a work window that reduces any impacts to farming operations. The transmission pipeline would pass through land outside of the City limits within unincorporated Monterey County.

Recycled Water Distribution Pipelines
The distribution system would be divided into two pipeline systems – to the northern and southern parts of the City. At the intersection of San Vicente Road and Front Street, the existing transmission main bifurcates with a pipeline continuing east along Front Street until it intersects West Street and terminates. At this location the distribution pipeline would connect to the existing transmission main to serve the City parks and schools located in the southern half of the City. The second segment of the existing transmission pipeline continues north along San Vicente Road then east and along Gabilan Drive until it intersects West Street and terminates. At this point, the distribution pipeline would tie into the existing transmission main to serve the City parks and schools located in the northern half of the City.

Appendix B contains plan sheets for pipeline segments included under this component of the Project.

As described above, proposed work at the schools and parks includes installing irrigation meters, disconnecting the potable water system from the irrigation system, installing irrigation piping, and replacing sprinkler heads with Title 22 compliant purple colored recycled water sprinkler heads.

1.6 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
Project construction is proposed primarily on existing roadway ROWs and the WRF property. The proposed transmission pipeline segment running from the WRF to Front Street would be constructed within an easement on existing farmland. Additional construction is proposed within temporary construction easements (“TCEs”) and on Soledad Unified School District (“SUSD”) properties. 172
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 19 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Site Preparation
Site preparation would primarily involve initial grading and trenching for pipeline installation.

Construction would involve open-trenching, which typically includes clearing and grading the ground surface along the pipeline alignments; excavating the trench; preparing and installing pipeline sections; installing vaults, air valves, blowoffs, and other pipeline components; backfilling the trench with nonexpansive fills; restoring preconstruction contours; and revegetating or paving the pipeline alignments, as appropriate. Site preparation activities are anticipated to be completed within approximately 18 months.

Grading
The Project would disturb a total of approximately 189,320 square feet (4.35 acres) of previously disturbed land. A total of approximately 3,800 linear feet of 12-inch pipeline, 6,200 linear feet of 8-inch pipe, 5,620 of 6-inch pipe, and 10,850 linear feet of 4-inch pipe would be constructed. Project construction would require approximately 31,400 cubic yards (“CY”) of cut and 31,100 CY of fill.

Schedule
Project construction is expected to last approximately 18-24 months. Construction would occur between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. No nighttime construction is proposed.

Equipment and Personnel
To complete Project construction on schedule, approximately 10 construction personnel would be present onsite at any given time. Additionally, the types of equipment that would be used during construction may include, but not be limited to:
 Excavator
 Backhoe
 Dump Truck
 Delivery Truck
 Water Truck
 Crane
Access and Circulation
The Project site is within the City of Soledad. Highway 101 and SR 146 provide regional access to the Project site and local access is provided via local roadways throughout the City. Access to the WRF is provided via Morisoli Road. Daily lay-down areas would be located along pipeline alignments within existing roadway ROWs. Longer-term equipment staging would be located at the WRF, off of Morisoli Road. It is currently unknown how many vehicle trips would be generated by the construction of the Proposed Project.

Tree Removal
Construction of the Project is not expected to require the removal of any trees. 173
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 20 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025

1.7 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
The City manages the current water system and would be responsible for operating and maintaining the new infrastructure for the recycled water system as part of ongoing operations and maintenance activities. The Proposed Project would serve the identified existing parks and schools, and operation would not result in increased water use or changes in existing land use.

1.8 OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
The primary regulation governing recycled water use is the California Water Code Regulations, Title 22.

The treatment requirement for this project would be tertiary treated recycled water, unrestricted use.

In June 2014, the California legislature passed State Bill 861, which authorized transfer of California Department of Public Health’s (“CDPH’s”) drinking and recycled water responsibilities, including the issuance of waste discharge requirements (“WDRs”), to the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”). Regulatory authority for projects using recycled water falls to the DDW within the SWRCB, as well as the Regional Water Quality Control Board (“RWQCB”).

The DDW is charged with protection of public health and drinking water supplies and with the development of uniform water recycling criteria appropriate to particular uses of water. DDW recommendations are implemented through permits issued by the RWQCB.

The City’s WRF produces effluent that meets Title 22 recycled water requirements. A Title 22 Report for the distribution of recycled water must be approved by DDW and the RWQCB before recycled water projects are implemented.

The SWRCB establishes general policies governing the permitting of recycled water projects consistent with its role of protecting water quality and sustaining water supplies. The SWRCB also exercises general oversight over recycled water projects, including review of RWQCB permitting practices. The SWRCB is the state agency that has jurisdiction over water quality throughout California. Under the SWRCB, nine RWQCBs have authority to exercise rulemaking and regulatory activities by water basin. The RWQCB is charged with protection of surface and groundwater resources. The City of Soledad is located within the jurisdiction of the Central Coastal RWQCB.
174
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 21 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Chapter 2. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by the Proposed Project, as discussed in the Initial Study analysis on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards/Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
Environmental Factors Not Affected
The following environmental resources were considered as part of the scoping and environmental analysis conducted for the Proposed Project. The potential for adverse impact to these resources were not identified. Consequently, there is no further discussion regarding these resources in this document.

Mineral Resources: The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (“SMARA”) of 1975 and the California Geological Survey (“CGS”) define and map regional significant mineral resources. The CGS delineates Mineral Resource Zones (“MRZs”) based on their mineral resource potential. The Proposed Project is located outside areas classified as MRZs and no mineral resources are known to exist on the Proposed Project site (CGS, 2022). For this reason, the Proposed Project would have no impact on mineral resources. Therefore, no further discussion is necessary. 175
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 22 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
176
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 23 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Chapter 3. Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the Proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Proposed Project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date
Don Wilcox, Director of Public Works
January 17, 2025
177
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 24 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
178
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 25 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Chapter 4. Environmental Setting and Impacts
The following chapter assesses the environmental impacts associated with the Proposed Project and identifies mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant, as appropriate.

Evaluation of Environmental Impacts

1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the Project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the Project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on project-specific screening analysis).

2. All answers must consider the whole action involved, including offsite as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.

3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.

4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.

5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section 15063(c)(3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were in the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the Project.

6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances) into the checklist references. Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
179
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 26 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025

7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.

8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.

9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 180
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 27 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025

4.1. Aesthetics
Environmental Setting
The Proposed Project is located in the City of Gonzales, within the Salinas Valley in Monterey County.

The Salinas Valley is a northwest-southeast trending valley between the Gabilan and Santa Lucia Ranges.

The visual character of the Project site comprises distant mountain ranges, the Salinas River, agricultural lands, and urban development within the City. The Proposed Project would be located primarily within the paved portions of City roadways, surrounded by residential and commercial uses. A 4,000-foot segment of the proposed recycled water transmission pipeline, running from the WRF to Front Street, would be surrounded by farmland. Additional construction would occur on SUSD properties to connect pipelines and convert or replace existing irrigation systems. All Project components would occur within previously disturbed areas and would be primarily located underground. Vegetation within the Project area consists of cropland and maintained lawns.

Visually sensitive areas are those containing scenic resources visible from existing, potential, and proposed scenic routes. Prominent visual resources in the Project vicinity are limited to distant views of the Gabilan Mountains. Additionally, the City’s General Plan identifies Metz Road (also known as Highway 146) as a State designated scenic highway (City of Soledad, 2005). However, while Caltrans identifies this roadway as an eligible scenic highway, it does not designate it as a State scenic highway (Caltrans, 2024). Approximately 2,250 feet of pipeline would be installed within Metz Road. Other segments of pipeline would be installed within City roads connecting to Metz Road and would be visible from this roadway.

Regulatory Framework
State
California Scenic Highways Program: The Legislature created the California State Scenic Highway program in 1963. This program’s purpose is to preserve and protect scenic highway corridors from change that would diminish the aesthetic value of lands adjacent to highways. The program includes a list of highways that are either designated or eligible for designation as a scenic highway. The state laws governing the Scenic Highway Program are found in the Streets and Highways Code, Sections 260 through 263. A highway may be designated scenic depending upon how much of the natural landscape can be seen by travelers, the scenic quality of the landscape, and the extent to which development intrudes upon the traveler’s enjoyment of the view. In Monterey County, the only officially designated state scenic highway are portions of State Route (“SR”) 1 (Caltrans, 2023). Highway 146 is a two-lane roadway which runs east to Pinnacles National Monument and south to King City. This is a state designated scenic highway, and provides regional access to the Project site (City, 2005a).

Local
City of Soledad General Plan: The City’s Conservation and Open Space Element section of the General Plan identifies the following aesthetic policies applicable to the Proposed Project:

C/OS7: The City shall require new public and private development to protect scenic resources by:
181
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 28 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
a. Prohibiting structures along ridgelines, steep slopes (above the 400-foot elevation contour), or in other highly visible locations unless no practical alternative is available, or such a location is necessary to protect public health and safety; b. Utilizing natural landforms and vegetation for screening structures, access roads, building foundations, and cut and fill slopes;
c. Requiring landscaping which provides a landscape transition between developed areas and adjacent open space or undeveloped areas; and is compatible with the scenic resource being protected;
d. Incorporating sound Soil Conservation Service practices and minimizing land alterations. Land alterations shall be minimized by: keeping cuts and fills to a minimum; limiting grading to the smallest practical area of land; limiting land exposure to the shortest practical amount of time; replanting graded areas to insure establishment of plant cover before the next rainy season; and creating grading contours that blend with the natural contours on site or look like contours that would naturally occur;
e. Designing roads, parking, and utilities to minimize visual impacts. If possible, utilities shall be underground. Roadways and parking shall fit the natural terrain; and f. Designing projects to fit the site's scale and character. Structures shall be designed and located so: they do not silhouette against ridgelines, or hilltops; roof lines and vertical architectural features blend with and do not detract from the natural background or ridge outline; residential density and massing is decreased with increased elevation where it would mar the scenic quality of the scenic resource; they fit the natural terrain, and they utilize building materials, colors, and textures that blend with the natural landscape and avoid the creation of high contrast situations.
2010 Monterey County General Plan: The 2010 Monterey County General Plan includes goals and policies related to the preservation of visual integrity. The following goal from the 2010 Monterey County General Plan would apply to portions of the Proposed Project:

Goal OS-1: Retain the character and natural beauty of Monterey County by preserving, conserving, and maintaining unique physical features, natural resources, and agricultural operations.

Monterey County Code: The County of Monterey Zoning Ordinance (Title 21) requires an evaluation of potential aesthetic-related effects and a determination of significance from common public view areas in areas outside of the Coastal Zone. “Common public viewing area means a public area such as a public street, road, designated vista point, or public park from which the general public ordinarily views the surrounding viewshed” (Section 21.06.195). Monterey County defines a substantial adverse visual impact as a “visual impact which, considering the condition of the existing viewshed, the proximity and duration of view when observed with normal unaided vision, causes an existing visual experience to be materially degraded” (Section 21.06.1275).
182
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 29 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?     b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings in a state scenic highway?
   
c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage
point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
   
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
   
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? For this analysis, views of the foothills to the northeast of the City, the Santa Lucia Mountains to the west, and the Gabilan Mountains east would represent scenic vistas. Obstruction of views of these resources would constitute a potentially significant impact. No other scenic vistas are visible within the project area.

Construction
The Proposed Project could result in temporary construction related effects. Construction of the pipeline components of the Proposed Project, including required improvements at school and park sites, would involve construction equipment that could result in visual effects on scenic vistas, including daily laydown of construction equipment within roadway ROWs. However, due to the linear nature of these components, construction equipment would not be located in a single position for extended periods of time, and the visual effects would be short-term and temporary.

Construction of the new recycled water pump station and creation of a long-term staging area would occur at the existing WRF, both of which could result in effects on scenic vistas. However, this site is already developed with the existing WRF, and the construction activities and equipment staging would not result in substantial effects on scenic vistas compared to existing conditions. In addition, equipment would be removed following construction and would not permanently impact scenic vistas. Therefore, this impact is less than significant.

Operation
Once operational, the pipeline components of the Proposed Project would be located largely underground and would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. Aboveground components of the Proposed Project would be limited primarily to the new recycled water pump 183
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 30 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
station. The recycled water pump station would be located on the site of the existing WRF. This site is already developed and the addition of the recycled water pump station would not impact scenic vistas, as none are provided from the site. Views of the Santa Lucia Mountains across the WRF site are already disrupted by the existing WRF buildings. Views of the foothills or Gabilan Mountains would not be impacted by the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project would not result in a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista due to operation. This represents a less than significant impact. b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings in a state scenic highway? The Proposed Project is not located near a state scenic highway (Caltrans, 2024). The Proposed Project is approximately 24 miles southeast from the nearest state scenic highway (SR 68). The City’s General Plan identifies Highway 146 as a designated scenic highway (City of Soledad, 2005), although Caltrans identifies it as “eligible but not officially designated” (Caltrans, 2024). The Proposed Project would not substantially damage scenic resources in a state scenic highway. In addition, the Central Salinas Valley Area Plan does not show any scenic roadways within the vicinity of the Proposed Project. No impact would occur.
c. Would the project, in nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage points). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Temporary visual impacts would occur during construction related to staging of construction equipment and ongoing construction work. However, these impacts would be temporary and the Project area would be restored to the same condition following completion of construction. Once operational, the Proposed Project would be largely underground, with the exception of the recycled water pump station component located at the City’s WRF. This addition to the existing WRF would blend in with the existing WRF structures and would not degrade the existing visual character of the Proposed Project area or its surroundings. As a result, the Proposed Project would not adversely impact the existing visual character of the site or its surroundings, or degrade the quality of public views of the site. This represents a less than significant impact.
d. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Construction activities would require staging of construction equipment and ongoing construction work.

No nighttime construction is proposed; however, staging of construction equipment at daily lay-down areas located along the pipeline alignments and long-term equipment staging at the WRF site could result in new sources of glare. However, these impacts would be temporary and the construction equipment would be removed from Project area following completion of construction. Once operational, the Proposed Project would be largely underground and would not result in new sources of light and glare. The aboveground components (recycled water pump station) of the Proposed Project would be located within the WRF. No new security lighting or reflective surfaces are proposed. This represents a less than significant impact.
184
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 31 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025

4.2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Terminology
The California Department of Conservation (“DOC”) identifies and designates important farmland throughout the State as part of the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (“FMMP”). Farmland is classified as follows:
 Prime Farmland. Farmland with the best combination of physical and chemical features able to sustain long-term agricultural production. This land has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained high yields. These are Class I and Class II soils.  Farmland of Statewide Importance. Farmland similar to Prime Farmland but with minor shortcomings, such as greater slopes or less ability to store soil moisture. Land must have been used for irrigated agricultural production at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date.
 Unique Farmland. Farmland of lesser quality soils used to produce the state's leading agricultural crops. This land is usually irrigated but may include non-irrigated orchards or vineyards as found in some climactic zones in California.  Grazing Land. Government Code §65570(b)(3) defines Grazing Land as: "...land on which the existing vegetation, whether grown naturally or through management, is suitable for grazing or browsing of livestock." The minimum mapping unit for Grazing Land is 40 acres. Grazing Land does not include land previously designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance, and heavily brushed, timbered, excessively steep, or rocky lands which restrict the access and movement of livestock.  Urban and Built-Up Land. Land occupied by structures with a building density of at least one (1) unit to 1.5 acres, or approximately six (6) structures to a 10-acre parcel. This land is used for residential, industrial, commercial, construction, institutional, public administration, railroad and other transportation yards, cemeteries, airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, water control structures, and other developed purposes.  Other Land. Land not included in any other mapping category. Common examples include low density rural developments; brush, timber, wetland, and riparian areas, not suitable for livestock grazing; confined livestock, poultry, or aquaculture facilities; strip mines, borrow pits; and water bodies smaller than 40 acres. Vacant and nonagricultural land surrounded by urban development and greater than 40 acres is mapped as Other Land.

California Public Resources Code §4526 and the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection defines "Timberland" as land not owned by the federal government nor designated as experimental forest land, which is capable and available for growing any commercial tree species.

Environmental Setting
Agricultural activities consisting of farming and livestock grazing represent the largest industry in the County of Monterey and contribute significantly to the region’s economy. The most productive farmlands in the County are located in the North County, Greater Salinas, and Central Salinas Valley Planning Areas. According to the 2017 Census of Agriculture for Monterey County, there are 1,340,142 acres designated as farmland (USDA, 2017). Monterey County's gross agricultural production in 2021 totaled 4.6 billion dollars (Monterey County Crop Report, 2021). The top crops in the County include 185
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 32 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
vegetable crops, fruit, and nuts (Ibid.). The top revenue crops produced in 2021 included strawberries, leaf lettuce, head lettuce, broccoli, wine grapes, spinach, cauliflower, celery, and brussels sprouts (Ibid).

The Proposed Project is partially located within areas where agricultural activities occur. Important farmlands within the Project are shown in Figure 9. The FMMP designates the agricultural lands in the Proposed Project area as Prime Farmland (DOC, 2024). Two (2) parcels located along the western side of a proposed pipeline alignment are enrolled in a Williamson Act contract.

CEQA requires the evaluation of forest and timber resources where they are present. The Proposed Project area does not contain forest land as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g), timberland as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526, or timberland zoned Timberland Production as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g).

Regulatory Framework
Federal
Farmland Protection Policy Act: The Farmland Protection Policy Act (“FPPA”) seeks to reduce federal program impacts on unnecessary and irreversible conversion of farmland to nonagricultural uses. This act requires federal agencies to develop and review policies to implement the FPPA every two years and comply with state and local programs and policies protecting farmland. The FPPA includes land such as forests, pastures, crop, or other land that may be used for farmland in the future. However, The FPPA does not include water or urban land. FPPA uses farmland classifications of “prime farmland,” “unique farmland,” and “land of statewide importance” (USDA, 2024).

State
California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (“Williamson Act”): The California Land Conservation Act of 1965, commonly referred to as the Williamson Act, is the State’s primary program aimed at conserving private land for agricultural use. The California Department of Conversation prepares countywide maps of lands enrolled in the Williamson Act contracts. The Williamson Act provides a voluntary, locally administered program offering reduced property taxes on lands whose owners place enforceable restrictions on land use through contracts between the individual landowners and local governments.

Local
City of Soledad General Plan: The City’s Land Use Element and Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan contains the following policies for agriculture applicable to the Proposed Project:

L-1: The land use designations and policies of this General Plan apply to the general plan area. Within the City’s planning areas, the City will support the following:
b. Preserve agriculture on large lots outside the City’s sphere of influence as it may be amended by the updated general plan.

C/OS3: The City shall ensure that new development and public infrastructure projects do not encourage expansion of urban uses outside the general plan area into areas designated Agriculture by the Monterey County General Plan.
186
¯
0 1,000 2,000 500 Feet
Other Land
Unique Farmland
Farmland of Statewide
Importance
Prime Farmland
Grazing Land
Urban and Built-Up
Land
Farmland Designation
Existing 12-inch
Transmission Line
Existing 8-inch
Transmission Line
Existing Facilities
Proposed Facilities
Important Farmland Map
Source: California Department of Conservation, 2024
8/13/2024
N/A
2024.26 9
Date Figure
Scale
Project
Title: Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341 187
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 34 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
C/OS6: The City shall require development within or adjacent to designated agricultural areas to minimize conflicts with adjacent agricultural uses.
2010 Monterey County General Plan: None of the policies provided by the 2010 Monterey County General Plan related to agricultural or forest resources are applicable to the Proposed Project.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
   
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
   
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by Government
Code section 51104(g)?
   
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest uses?
   
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
   
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? The Proposed Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, to non-agricultural use. While there are agricultural uses on Prime Farmland adjacent to portions of the Proposed Project (primarily along Morisoli Road and portions of Front Street), the Proposed Project would be located on existing roadway ROW and the WRF property, which are disturbed and developed areas. The proposed pipeline segment running from the WRF to Front Street would be constructed within an easement on existing farmland. However, no agricultural work occurs within the easement and the Proposed Project would not result in the conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. This represents a less than significant impact. 188
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 35 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
b. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? The Proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. While the Proposed Project is located adjacent to areas currently zoned for agricultural use and under a Williamson Act Contract (primarily along Morisoli Road and portions of Front Street), project activities occurring within agricultural parcels would be limited to existing easements and would not conflict with agricultural use under a Williamson Act contract. This represents a less than significant impact.
c. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)?
The Proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land. No forest or timberland is located on or in the vicinity of the Proposed Project site. No impact would occur. d. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest uses? Please refer to the discussion above. The Proposed Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use since none existing on the site. No impact would occur. e. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
The Proposed Project would not involve changes to the existing environment that could result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or forest land to non-forest use. Construction and operation of the Proposed Project within agricultural parcels would be limited to existing easements and would not result in the conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use. There is no forest land within or adjacent to the Proposed Project area. No impact would occur.

4.3. Air Quality
Environmental Setting
The Proposed Project is in the North Central Coast Air Basin (“NCCAB”), which encompasses Santa Cruz, San Benito, and Monterey counties. The NCCAB is under the jurisdiction of the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (“MBARD”). MBARD is responsible for producing an Air Quality Management Plan (“AQMP”) that reports air quality and regulates stationary air pollution sources throughout the NCCAB.

MBARD is also responsible for measuring the concentration of pollutants and comparing those concentrations against the Ambient Air Quality Standards (“AAQS”). AAQS establish levels of air quality maintenance required to protect the public from the adverse effects of air pollution and are established for “criteria air pollutants” which include ozone, carbon monoxide, particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter, 2.5 microns in diameter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and lead. MBARD is responsible for monitoring criteria pollutants to determine whether they are in attainment or not in attainment with the AQMP. Table 1 illustrates the attainment status for criteria pollutants. 189
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 36 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Table 1
Attainment Status for the NCCAB
Pollutants State Designation Federal Designation
Ozone (O3) Nonattainment – Transitional Attainment
Inhalable Particulates (PM10) Nonattainment Attainment
Fine Particulates (PM2.5) Attainment Attainment
Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monterey Co. – Attainment Attainment Carbon Monoxide (CO) San Benito Co. – Unclassified Attainment Carbon Monoxide (CO) Santa Cruz Co. – Unclassified Attainment Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Attainment Attainment
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Attainment Attainment
Lead Attainment Attainment
Source: Monterey Bay Air Resources District, 2017. 2012 – 2015 Air Quality Management Plan MBARD has set air quality thresholds of significance for the evaluation of projects. Table 2 illustrates the thresholds of significance used to determine if a project would have a significant air quality effect during construction. In addition to these thresholds, MBARD has also determined a significant short-term construction generated impact would occur if more than 2.2 acres of major grading or excavation, or 8.1 acres of minimal earthmoving per day was to occur (MBARD, 2008).

Table 2
Thresholds of Significance for Construction Emissions
Pollutant Threshold of Significance (lb./day)
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 173
Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) 137
Respirable Particular Matter (PM10) 82
Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 55
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550
Source: Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District, 2016. Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.

Table 3 illustrates the thresholds of significance used to determine if a project would have a significant air quality effect on the environment during operation.

Table 3
Thresholds of Significance for Operational Emissions
Pollutant Threshold of Significance (lb./day)
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 137
Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) 137
Respirable Particular Matter (PM10) 82
Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 55
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550
Source: Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District, 2016. Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.

The California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) defines a sensitive receptor as children, elderly, asthmatic, and others who are at elevated risk of negative health outcomes due to exposure to air pollution (CARB, 2023). Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Sec. 42705.5, a sensitive receptor includes hospitals, schools and day cares centers and such locations as the district or state board may determine.

MBARD similarly defines sensitive receptors and requires any explanation of sensitive receptors to draw 190
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 37 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
a relationship to the Proposed Project site and potential air quality impacts (MBARD, 2008). Sensitive receptors are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the general population. Land uses that are considered sensitive receptors include residences, schools, and health care facilities. Sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the Proposed Project area consist primarily of residences.

Common sources of odors and odor complaints include wastewater treatment plants, transfer stations, coffee roasters, painting/coating operations, and landfills.

Climate and Topography
Climatological conditions, an area's topography, and the quantity and type of pollutants released commonly determine ambient air quality. The NCCAB covers an area of 5,159 square miles along the central coast. The northwest sector of the NCCAB is dominated by the Santa Cruz Mountains. The Diablo Range marks the northeastern boundary. The Santa Clara Valley extends into the northeastern tip of the basin. Further south, the Santa Clara Valley becomes the San Benito Valley, which runs northwestsoutheast, with the Gabilan Range as its western boundary. To the west of the Gabilan Range is the Salinas Valley, which extends from Salinas at the northwest end to south of King City. The coastal Santa Lucia Range defines the western side of the valley.

Climate, or the average weather condition, affects air quality in several ways. Wind patterns can remove or add air pollutants emitted by either stationary or mobile sources. Inversion, a condition where warm air traps cooler air underneath it, can hold pollutants near the ground by limiting upward mixing (dilution). Communities with cold climates may burn wood or other fuels for residential heating, whereas areas with hot climates may have higher emissions or some pollutants from automobiles.

Topography also plays a part, and valleys often trap emissions by limiting lateral dispersal.

A semi-permanent high-pressure cell in the eastern Pacific, the Pacific High, is the basic controlling factor in the climate of the NCCAB. In the summer, the high-pressure cell is dominant and causes persistent west and northwest winds over the entire coast. Air descends in the Pacific High, forming a stable temperature inversion of hot air over a cool coastal layer of air. The onshore air currents pass over cool ocean waters to bring fog and relatively cool air into the coastal valleys. The warmer air aloft acts as a lid to inhibit vertical air movement. During the winter, the Pacific High migrates southward and has less influence on the NCCAB. Air frequently flows in a southeasterly direction out of the Salinas and San Benito Valleys, especially during night and morning hours. The general absence of deep, persistent inversions and the occasional storm systems usually result in good air quality for the basin in winter and early spring.

Regulatory Framework
Federal
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”): At the federal level, the U.S. EPA implements national air quality programs. The Federal Clean Air Act (“FCAA”), signed in 1970, provides air quality mandates used by the U.S. EPA. Congress amended the FCAA in 1977 and again in 1990.

Federal Clean Air Act: The FCAA required the U.S. EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”) and set deadlines for their attainment. Two (2) types of NAAQS exist: primary standards, which protect public health, and secondary standards, which protect public welfare from 191
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 38 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
non-health-related adverse effects, such as visibility restrictions. The FCAA allows states to adopt additional or more health-protective standards. Table 4 compares the California Ambient Air Quality Standards and the NAAQS.

Table 4
Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards
Pollutant Averaging Time California Standard* National Standards (Primary)
Ozone 1-Hour 0.09 ppm - -
Ozone 8-Hour 0.07 ppm 0.070 ppm
PM10 AAM 20 µg/m3 - -
PM10 24-Hour 50 µg/m3 150 µg/m3
PM2.5 AAM 12 µg/m3 12 µg/m3
PM2.5 24-Hour No standard 35 µg/m3
Carbon Monoxide 1-Hour 20 ppm 35 ppm
Carbon Monoxide 8-Hour 9.0 ppm 9 ppm
Nitrogen Dioxide AAM 0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm
Nitrogen Dioxide 1-Hour 0.18 ppm 100 ppm
Sulfur Dioxide AAM - - 0.03 ppm
Sulfur Dioxide 24-Hour 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm
Sulfur Dioxide 3-Hour - - 0.5 ppm (1300 μg/m3) **
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour 0.25 ppm 75 ppm
Lead 30- day 1.5 µg/m3 - -
Lead Calendar
quarter - - 1.5 µg/m3
Lead Rolling 3-month - - 0.15 µg/m3
Sulfate 24-Hour 25 µg/m3 No Federal Standards
Hydrogen Sulfide 1-Hour 0.03 ppm (42 µg/m3) No Federal Standards Vinyl Chloride 24-Hour 0.01 ppm (26 µg/m3) No Federal Standards Visibility Reducing
Particles 8-hours
Extinction coefficient of 0.23 per kilometer
—visibility of ten miles or more (0.07 —
30 miles or more for Lake Tahoe) due to
particles when relative humidity is < 70%.

No Federal Standards
Source: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/aaqs2.pdf ppm = Parts per Million; µg/m3 = Micrograms per Cubic Meter; AAM = Annual Arithmetic Mean * For more information on standards visit :http//www.arb.ca.gov.research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf **Secondary Standard
Source: CARB, 2016
The FCAA also required each state to prepare an air quality control plan referred to as a State Implementation Plan (“SIP”). The 1990 FCAA Amendments required states with non-attainment areas to revise their SIPs to incorporate additional control measures to reduce air pollution. The SIP is periodically modified to reflect the latest emissions inventories, planning documents, and rules and regulations of the air basins as reported by their jurisdictional agencies. The U.S. EPA has the responsibility to review all state SIPs to determine conformance with the mandates of the FCAA and FCAA amendments. The U.S. EPA also determines if implementation will achieve air quality goals. If the U.S. EPA determines a SIP to be inadequate, a Federal Implementation Plan (“FIP”) may be prepared for the non-attainment area that imposes additional control measures. 192
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 39 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Pursuant to California Clean Air Act (“CCAA”) and CCAA amendments, a region must participate in the SIP if the state designates it as a maintenance region. The most recent Federal Plan prepared by MBARD to maintain the 1-hour ozone NAAQS is the 2007 Federal Maintenance Plan for Maintaining the National Ozone Standard in the Monterey Bay Region and adopted rules and regulations.

State
California Air Resources Board: CARB is the agency responsible for coordinating and overseeing state and local air pollution control programs in California and implementing the CCAA of 1988. Other CARB duties include monitoring air quality (in conjunction with air monitoring networks maintained by air pollution control districts and air quality management districts, establishing California Ambient Air Quality Standards (“CAAQS”), which in many cases are more stringent than the NAAQS, and setting emissions standards for new motor vehicles.
1 Table 4 summarizes the CAAQS above.

California Clean Air Act: The CCAA requires all air districts in the state to endeavor to achieve and maintain CAAQS for Ozone, CO, SO2, and NO2 by the earliest practical date. The CCAA specifies that districts focus particular attention on reducing emissions from transportation and area-wide emission sources, and the act provides districts with authority to regulate indirect sources of emissions. Each district plan is required to either (1) achieve a five (5) percent annual reduction, averaged over consecutive three (3)-year periods, in district-wide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or its precursors, or (2) provide for the implementation of all feasible measures to reduce emissions. Any planning effort for air quality attainment would thus need to consider both state and federal planning requirements.

Assembly Bills 1807 & 2588 - Toxic Air Contaminants: California Assembly Bill (“AB”) 1807 (Tanner Air Toxics Act) and AB 2588 (Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987) primarily regulate Toxic Air Contaminants (“TACs”). The Tanner Air Toxics Act sets forth a formal procedure for CARB to designate substances as TACs. This procedure includes research, public participation, and scientific peer review before CARB designates a substance as a TAC. Existing sources of TACs that are subject to the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act are required to: 1) prepare a toxic emissions inventory; 2) prepare a risk assessment if emissions are significant; 3) notify the public of significant risk levels; and 4) prepare and implement risk reduction measures.

Local
Monterey Bay Air Resources District: MBARD is the agency primarily responsible for ensuring that NAAQS and CAAQS are not exceeded and that air quality conditions are maintained in the NCCAB.

Responsibilities of the MBARD include, but are not limited to, preparing plans for the attainment of ambient air quality standards, adopting, and enforcing rules and regulations concerning sources of air pollution, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollution, inspecting stationary sources of air pollution, responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, and implementing programs and regulations required by the FCAA and the CCAA. To achieve NAAQS and CAAQS and maintain air quality, the MBARD has most recently completed the 2012-2015 AQMP for achieving the state ozone standards and the 2007 Federal Maintenance Plan for maintaining federal ozone standards (MBARD 2017).
1 The emission standards established for motor vehicles differ depending on various factors including the model year, and the type of vehicle, fuel, and engine used.
193
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 40 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
To achieve and maintain ambient air quality standards, the MBARD has adopted various rules and regulations for the control of airborne pollutants. The applicable MBARD rules and regulations to the Proposed Project include, but are not limited to, the following:
 Rule 402 (Nuisances). The purpose of this rule is to prohibit emissions that may create a public nuisance. Applies to any source operation that emits or may emit air contaminants or other materials.
 Rule 426 (Architectural Coatings). The purpose of this rule is to limit emissions of volatile organic compounds from architectural coatings.
 Rule 425 (Use of Cutback Asphalt). The purpose of this rule is to limit emissions of vapors of organic compounds from the use of cutback and emulsified asphalt. This rule applies to the manufacture and use of cutback, slow cure, and emulsified asphalt during paving and maintenance operations.
 Rule 424 (NESHAP-Asbestos). Rule 424 adopts the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 61) pertaining to asbestos removal and building demolitions.

City of Soledad General Plan: The City’s Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan contains the following policy for air quality applicable to the Proposed Project:

C/OS-15: The City shall submit development proposals to the Air Pollution Control District for review and comment in compliance with CEQA prior to consideration by the decisionmaking body. 2010 Monterey County General Plan: None of the policies provided by the 2010 Monterey County General Plan related to air quality are applicable to portions of the Proposed Project.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?    
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
   
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?    
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
   
194
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 41 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? An Air Quality Assessment was prepared for the Project by AMBIENT Air Quality & Noise Consulting (August 2024). CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(b) requires that a project be evaluated for consistency with applicable regional plans, including the AQMP. The most recent AQMP update was approved in March 2017. This plan addresses attainment of the State ozone standards and federal air quality standard. The AQMP accommodates growth by projecting growth in emissions based on population forecasts prepared by the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (“AMBAG”). Consistency determinations are issued for commercial, industrial, residential, and infrastructure-related projects that have the potential to induce population growth. A project is inconsistent with the AQMP if it has not been accommodated in the forecast projections considered in the AQMP.

The Proposed Project involves the expansion of recycled water distribution to existing City parks and schools. The recycled water would be used to irrigate landscaped areas, playfields, and other areas that are currently irrigated using potable groundwater. The Proposed Project would not result in growth that was unaccounted for in population forecast contained in MBARD’s AQMP. The Proposed Project would not conflict with and/or otherwise obstruct implementation of the AQMP. This represents a less than significant impact related to clean air planning.
b. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
The MBARD 2016 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines contain standards of significance for evaluating potential air quality effects of projects subject to the requirements of CEQA. According to MBARD, a project would violate an air quality standard and/or contribute to an existing or projected violation if it would emit (from all sources, including exhaust and fugitive dust) less than:
 137 pounds per day of oxides of nitrogen (NOx),
 137 pounds per day of reactive organic gases (ROG),
 82 pounds per day of respirable particulate matter (PM10),  55 pounds per day of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and  550 pounds per day carbon monoxide (CO).

Potential air quality effects were quantified using CalEEMod. Air quality calculations were performed by AMBIENT and are provided in Appendix C.

Construction
Construction of the Proposed Project would require substantial grading and excavation (including export of 21,800 cubic yards [“cy”] of soil material and import of 24,600 cy of soil material). Ground disturbing activities would occur on approximately three and a half acres. The Proposed Project also includes approximately three acres of asphalt paving within the ground disturbing area. Construction would require equipment such as bulldozers, vibratory compactors, dump trucks, front loaders, cranes, concrete trucks, pavers, and delivery trucks. Construction related emissions would come from sources 195
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 42 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
such as exhaust or fugitive dust. Air quality effects were quantified using CalEEMod, Table 5, illustrates the emissions generated by construction of the Project.

Table 5
Construction Air Quality Emissions1
Emissions in Pounds/Day by Facility ROG NOx5 CO PM10 PM2.5 Foundation/Concrete - Unmitigated 0.57 0.43 4.99 0.37 0.1 Grading - Unmitigated 1.46 1.16 12.33 7.05 3.5
Pump Station Install - Unmitigated 0.47 0.4 3.75 0.08 0.01 Asphalt Paving - Unmitigated 0.38 0.24 3.84 0.51 0.13
Trenching - Unmitigated 0.46 0.31 4.4 0.5 0.13
Total All Facilities 3.34 2.54 29.3 8.51 3.87
MBARD Significance Threshold?2 -- -- -- 82 --
Exceed Threshold/Significant Impact? -- -- -- No --
1 Based on the highest daily emissions during summer or winter conditions without the implementation of fugitive dust control measures. Assumes foundation/concrete, pump station installation, trenching (2025), and asphalt paving could potentially occur simultaneously. 2 The MBARD has not identified significance thresholds for ROG, NOX, CO or PM2.5. Emissions of ROG and NOX are accommodated in the emission inventories of State- and federally-required air plans and would not have a significant impact on the attainment and maintenance of ozone AAQS. Emissions of PM2.5 are a component of PM10.

Operation
Based on the results of air quality assessment, the daily activities associated with long-term operations of the Project would not generate emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors from mobile, energy use, and area sources. Daily operational emissions of criteria pollutants would not exceed any MBARD emissions thresholds and would not have a significant impact on regional air quality or attainment and maintenance of O3 ambient air quality standards. For these reasons, operational emissions would have a less than significant impact on public health. The long-term operational activities would, therefore, have a less than significant air quality impact. c. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Short-Term Construction Emissions
Naturally-Occurring Asbestos (NOA): The ARB identifies NOA as a TAC. In accordance with ARB Air Toxics Control Measure, prior to any grading activities, a geologic evaluation should be conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that would be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an exemption request form, along with a copy of the geologic report, must be filed with the local air district. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos Air Toxics Control Measure. The Project site is not located within an area identified as having a potential for naturally occurring ultramafic rock and serpentine soils. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Asbestos-Containing Materials: Demolition activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issues surrounding the proper handling, demolition, and disposal of asbestos-containing material (ACM). ACM could be encountered during the demolition of existing buildings, particularly older structures constructed prior to 1970. Asbestos can also be found in various building products, including (but not limited to) utility pipes/pipelines (transit pipes or insulation on pipes). If a project involves the disturbance or potential disturbance of ACM, various regulatory requirements may apply. 196
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 43 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
The Project would not include the demolition of existing on-site structures. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.

TACs (DPM Emissions): The primary TAC of concern associated with short-term construction activities is DPM. Implementation of the Project would result in the generation of DPM emissions during construction associated with the use of offroad diesel equipment for site grading, paving, and other construction activities. Health-related risks associated with diesel-exhaust emissions are primarily associated with long-term exposure and the associated risk of contracting cancer. For off-site work and residential land uses, the calculation of cancer risk associated with exposure to TACs is typically calculated based on a 25-year and 30-year period of exposure, respectively. The use of diesel-powered construction equipment would be temporary and episodic, typically only occurring over a short period (i.e., weeks or months). For this reason and given the highly dispersive nature of DPM, exposure to construction-generated DPM would not be anticipated to exceed applicable thresholds (i.e., incremental increase in cancer risk of 10 in one million or a HI greater than 1). As a result, this impact is considered less than significant.

Fugitive Dust Emissions: Construction of the Project would result in short-term emissions of fugitive particulate matter associated with ground disturbance. However, compliance with applicable MBARD rules and regulations, including but not limited to Rule 402 for the control of nuisance–related emissions would minimize potential impacts to occupants of nearby land uses. Furthermore, constructiongenerated PM10 would be significantly less than MBARD’s daily significance threshold of 82 lbs/day. As previously noted, MBARD has determined that emissions below 82 lbs/day would not be expected to exceed AAQS. As a result, this impact would be considered less than significant.

Additionally, the Proposed Project would implement standard Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) to further reduce air pollution emissions. These BMPs include, but are not limited to, the following measures:
 Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible;  Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water shall be used whenever possible;  All dirt stockpile areas shall be sprayed daily as needed;  Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re-vegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities;
 Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established;
 All disturbed soil areas not subject to re-vegetation shall be stabilized using chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the MBARD;  All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114;
 Install track-out control devices where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site;
197
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 44 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
 Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water shall be used whenever possible;  All dirt stock pile areas shall be sprayed daily as needed;  Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re-vegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities;
 Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established;
 All disturbed soil areas not subject to re-vegetation shall be stabilized using chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the MBARD;  All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114;
 Install track-out control devices where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site;
 Sweep paved/unpaved roadways boundaries (e.g.) project entrance roadways) at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water shall be used where feasible;
 Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications;  Fuel all off-road and portable diesel-powered equipment with CARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for use off-road);  Use diesel construction equipment over 25 horsepower meeting CARB's Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner off-road heavy-duty diesel engines and comply with the State Off-Road Regulation. If Tier 2 equipment is not available, then documentation shall be maintained demonstrating equipment non-availability for verification;
 Use on-road heavy-duty trucks on-site that meet the CARB’s 2007 or cleaner certification standard for on-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State On-Road Regulation;  Construction or trucking companies with fleets that do not have engines in their fleet that meet the engine standards identified in the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOX exempt area fleets) may be eligible by proving alternative compliance;  All on- and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than five minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated staging areas and at the project entrance to remind drivers and operators of the five-minute idling limit;
 Diesel idling in 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted (applicable only along the northernmost edge of the project site);
 Electrify equipment when feasible;
 Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered equipment, where feasible; and  Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on-site where feasible, such as compressed natural gas (“CNG”), liquefied natural gas (“LNG”), propane or biodiesel.  Implement Idling Restrictions Near Sensitive Receptors for Both On and off-Road Equipment Long-term Operational Emissions
The Project would not result in the installation or operation of any major stationary sources of air pollution emissions. As a result, this impact would be less than significant. 198
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 45 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
d. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Odors could be generated during Project construction. The occurrence and severity of odor impacts depend on numerous factors, including the nature, frequency, and intensity of the source; wind speed and direction; and the sensitivity of the receptors. While offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they can be very unpleasant, leading to considerable distress among the public and often generating citizen complaints to local governments and regulatory agencies. Construction of the Project would involve the use of a variety of gasoline or diesel-powered equipment that would emit exhaust fumes.

Exhaust fumes, particularly diesel exhaust, may be considered objectionable by some people. However, construction-generated emissions would occur intermittently throughout the workday and would dissipate rapidly within increasing distance from the source. As a result, short-term construction activities would not expose a substantial number of people to frequent odorous emissions. In addition, no major sources of odors have been identified in the Project area. This represents a less than significant impact.

4.4. Biological Resources
Terminology
Special-Status Species
Special-status species are those plants and animals that have been formally listed or proposed for listing as endangered or threatened or are candidates for such listing under the Federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) or the California Endangered Species Act (“CESA”). Listed species are afforded legal protection under the ESA and CESA. Species that meet the definition of rare or endangered under the CEQA Section 15380 are also considered special-status species. Animals on the CDFW’s list of “species of special concern” (most of which are species whose breeding populations in California may face extirpation if current population trends continue) meet this definition and are typically provided management consideration through the CEQA process, although they are not legally protected under the ESA or CESA. Additionally, the CDFW also includes some animal species that are not assigned any of the other status designations on their “Special Animals” list; however, these species have no legal or protection status.

Plants listed as rare under the California Native Plant Protection Act (“CNPPA”) or included in the California Native Plant Society (“CNPS”) California Rare Plant Ranks (“CRPR”) 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B are also treated as special-status species as they meet the definitions of Sections 2062 and 2067 of the CESA and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15380. In general, the CDFW requires that plant species on CRPR 1A (Plants presumed extirpated in California and Either Rare or Extinct Elsewhere), CRPR 1B (Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere), CRPR 2A (Plants presumed extirpated in California, but more common elsewhere); and CRPR 2B (Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere) of the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS, 2023) be fully considered during the preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA. CNPS’ CRPR 4 species (plants of limited distribution) may, but generally do not, meet the definitions of Sections 2062 and 2067 of the CESA, and are not typically considered in environmental documents relating to CEQA. While other species (i.e., CRPR 3 or 4 species) are sometimes found in database searches or in the literature, these were not included in the analysis as they did not meet the definitions of Section 2062 and 2067 of the CESA.
199
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 46 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Fish and Game Code Section 3503.5 protects raptors (e.g., eagles, hawks, and owls) and their nests in California. Section 3503.5 states that it is “unlawful to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except otherwise provided by this code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto.” Additionally, fully protected species under the Fish and Game Code Section 3511 (birds), Section 4700 (mammals), Section 5515 (fish), and Section 5050 (reptiles and amphibians) are also considered specialstatus animal species. Species with no formal special-status designation but thought by experts to be rare or in serious decline may also be considered special-status animal species in some cases, depending on project-specific analysis and relevant, localized conservation needs or precedence.

Sensitive Habitats
Sensitive habitats include riparian corridors, wetlands, habitats for legally protected species, areas of high biological diversity, areas supporting rare or special-status wildlife habitat, and unusual or regionally restricted vegetation types. Vegetation types considered sensitive include those listed on CDFW’s California Natural Communities List (i.e., those habitats that are rare or endangered in the borders of California) (CDFW, 2023), those that are occupied by species listed under the ESA or are critical habitat in accordance with the ESA, and those that are defined as Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas under the California Coastal Act. Specific habitats may also be identified as sensitive in city or county general plans or ordinances. Sensitive habitats are regulated under federal regulations (such as the Clean Water Act and Executive Order 11990 – Protection of Wetlands), state regulations (such as CEQA and the CDFW Streambed Alteration Program), or local ordinances or policies (such as city or county tree ordinances and general plan policies).

Environmental Setting
Survey Methodology
DD&A conducted a site reconnaissance and biological survey of the Proposed Project site. DD&A Senior Environmental Scientists conducted surveys of the evaluation area in August 2024. The surveys consisted of walking the site to identify general and sensitive habitat types and conducting a reconnaissance-level habitat survey to identify suitable habitat for or presence of any special-status plant or wildlife species. Data collected during the surveys was used to assess the environmental conditions of the area and its surroundings, evaluate environmental constraints at the site and within the local vicinity, and provide a basis for recommendations to minimize and avoid impacts. The biological resources report is provided in Appendix D and summarized below.

Habitats
Approximately 23.4 acres of the evaluation area are developed consisting of paved roads, graded dirt lots, or landscaped properties (locations for new transmission and service lines throughout the City, and the WRF new pump station and staging ground) and approximately 3.6 acres of the evaluation area is ruderal or agricultural habitat (the segments of the evaluation area along Morisoli Road), which consist of actively cultivated agricultural fields (see Figures 10 and 11). 200
Habitat Map -
Agricultural
11/15/2024
N/A
2024.26 10
Figure Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341
Date
Scale
Project
Title:
201
Habitat Map -
Developed
09/12/2024
N/A
2024.26 11
Figure Monterey | San Jose
Denise Duffy and Associates, Inc.

Environmental Consultants Resource Planners
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-4341
Date
Scale
Project
Title:
202
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 49 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Access to the agricultural easement and WRF was limited during the August 22, 2024 biological survey.

Most of the land surrounding the evaluation area is developed with single-family residences with the schools and city parks to be serviced by the new pipelines spread throughout. Due to the disturbed (mowed, sprayed, landscaped) nature of the evaluation area, no vegetation associations identified in A Manual of California Vegetation are present, and these areas are not considered sensitive by any regulatory agency. A description of each community is provided below.

Ruderal: Ruderal areas are those areas which have been developed or have been subject to historic and ongoing disturbance by human activities and are devoid of vegetation or dominated by non-native and/or invasive weed species. Within the evaluation area, ruderal land consisted primarily of mowed or graded dirt roads and access areas within the WRF. Ruderal habitat within the excavated drainage ponds (Figure 10) was dominated by invasive annuals and contained no emergent or riparian vegetation.

Ruderal areas are considered to have low biological value as they are generally denuded of vegetation or are dominated by non-native plant species and consist of relatively low-quality habitat from a wildlife perspective. However, some common wildlife species that do well in urbanized areas, including European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi), raccoon (Procyon lotor), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), and rock pigeon (Columba livia), may be found foraging within these areas.

Agricultural: Approximately 1.8 acres of the survey area are in active agricultural use at the current location of the service pipeline connecting the WRF to the City (Figure 10). This area is continuously managed and cultivated for food crops, and is likely subject to frequent soil tilling, weeding, and treatment with insecticides and herbicides. As such, it provides poor habitat for most plant and wildlife species of concern; however, some special-status plants, including Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii), have been known to occur in ditches and unmaintained edges of agricultural fields and roadways.

Developed: As identified above, developed areas within the evaluation area consist of paved roads, dirt roads, landscaped parks, and the WRF (see Figures 10 and 11). Developed areas are considered to have low biological value as they are generally denuded of vegetation and consist of relatively low-quality habitat from a wildlife perspective. However, the common wildlife species identified above for ruderal communities may be found foraging within these areas. Landscaped plants within the park of the evaluation area lack the continuous flowers necessary to support insect species of concern, however they may provide nesting habitat for raptor and other avian species.

Sensitive Habitats
A historic seasonal wetland feature is present approximately 20 ft south of the survey area located at the intersection of Gabilan Drive and Toledo St (Figure 11). The location is identified as a seasonal wetland feature on the Service’s National Wetlands Mapper, but it is noted as “excavated by humans.” The site also contains multiple drainage culverts and is unlikely to contain water outside of active rain storm events. Additionally, several excavated drainage ponds are located adjacent to the survey area as well as within the proposed location of the new storage reservoir and pump station at the WRF (Figure 10). These locations are identified by the Service as temporary wetlands that are artificially filled by pumps. This habitat is not suitable breeding habitat for any wildlife species of concern. 203
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 50 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
No emergent hydrophytic vegetation or other wetland indicators were observed within any of these locations during the August 22, 2024 biological survey. None of the ponds show up in the USGS Hydrographic Dataset (USGS, 2024) nor do they meet the definition of waters of the U.S. as identified in CFR 328.3(a)(8), and, therefore, are not subject to the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act.

Special-Status Species
Published occurrence data within the Project area and surrounding USGS quadrangles were evaluated to compile a table of special-status species known to occur in the vicinity of the evaluation area. Each of these species was evaluated for their likelihood to occur within and immediately adjacent to the site. No special-status plant species were observed within the evaluation area during biological surveys; however, based on the species-specific reasons presented in Appendix D, Congdon’s tarplant may occur within the survey area. Three special-status wildlife species have the potential to occur within the evaluation area: Salinas pocket mouse (Perognathus inornatus psammophilus), San Joaquin whipsnake (Masticophis flagellum ruddocki), and white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus). In addition to the white-tailed kite, raptors and other nesting birds have the potential to occur in the area. These species are discussed below. All other species are assumed unlikely to occur or have a low potential to occur based on the species-specific reasons presented in Appendix D, and are not discussed further.

Congdon’s Tarplant: Congdon’s tarplant is an annual herb in the Asteraceae family that has a variable blooming period from May through November. It is found in valley and foothill grassland on heavy clay, saline or alkaline soils in low-lying disturbed areas that collect water. It is often found in disturbed areas with non-native annuals and grassland species, as well as ditches and vegetated spaces alongside roads and farmland. No individuals of this species were observed during the August 22, 2024 survey; however, the majority of the survey area that would be the most likely to have suitable habitat for Congdon’s tarplant was inaccessible for the survey, therefore its presence within the evaluation area cannot be entirely ruled out.

Salinas Pocket Mouse: Salinas pocket mouse is a CDFW Species of Concern. This sub-species of the San Joaquin pocket mouse (Perognathus inornatus) is found within chaparral, shrubland, blue oak woodland, and annual grassland habitats of the Salinas Valley. They are most abundant in uncultivated areas and often live in areas with sandy washes and finely textured soils. They are nocturnal, foraging in the night and spending most of the day in their burrows, which are typically dug at the base of shrubs. Burrows are additionally utilized for hibernating, which occurs 2-3 times a year, and rearing young during the breeding season (March – July). Salinas pocket mouse are the most likely to occur within the agricultural easement along Morisoli Road and near the new service line hookups at Toledo Park. The nearest CNDDB occurrence of the species is from 2006 located 1.6 km north of the site. Therefore, Salinas pocket mouse has a moderate potential to be found within the Project evaluation area.

San Joaquin Whipsnake: The San Joaquin whipsnake is a CDFW species of special concern. Whipsnakes seek cover in rodent burrows, bushes, trees, and rock piles. This species hibernates in soil or sand approximately 0.3 m below the surface, sometimes at the bases of plants. Little is known about nest sites.

In desert regions, whipsnakes may be attracted to water to drink or ambush prey. Open terrestrial habitats are preferred, but whipsnakes will occasionally climb trees and bushes to bask, seek prey, or take cover. Diet consists of rodents, lizards and their eggs, snakes (including rattlesnakes), birds and their eggs, young turtles, insects, and carrion. Whipsnakes, a diurnal species, search actively for prey, with 204
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 51 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
their heads elevated. This species inserts its head in burrows or climbs trees, using both vision and olfaction to detect prey. Mating occurs in April and May, eggs are laid in June and July, and the first young appear in late August to early September.

The CNDDB reports 3 occurrences of San Joaquin whipsnake within the quadrangles evaluated. The nearest occurrence is 9.8 km miles from the survey area from 1987. Habitat quality for San Joaquin whipsnake within the survey area is relatively low. The entire site is ruderal, agriculture, or developed habitat that does not provide appropriate cover or habitat conditions for San Joaquin whipsnake; however, the staging area is approximately 100 m from the Salinas River floodplain and may provide dispersal habitat for San Joaquin whipsnake.

White-Tailed Kite: White-tailed kite is a California fully-protected species and is protected by the MBTA and Fish and Game code. This raptor species is a common to uncommon, year-long resident in coastal and valley lowlands. WTK generally utilizes herbaceous lowlands with variable tree growth and an associated high population density of voles (Microtus californicus). Nests are made of loosely piled sticks and twigs and lined with grass, straw, or rootlets. Nests are generally placed near the top of dense oak (Quercus sp.), willow, or other tree stands (usually 6-20 meters above ground) and are often located near an open foraging area. Breeding occurs from February to October with peak activity occurring from May to August. This species preys predominantly on voles and other small mammals, but also takes birds, insects, reptiles, and amphibians. Foraging occurs in undisturbed open grasslands, meadows, farmlands, and emergent wetlands. Suitable nesting habitat is present within the trees directly adjacent to the evaluation area. Suitable hunting and foraging habitat are not present within the site; however, the nearby agricultural lands, vacant lots, and parks may provide suitable foraging habitat for this species.

The Project evaluation area is within the known breeding range of the white-tailed kite and the CNDDB reports 6 occurrences of the species within the quadrangles reviewed. The nearest CNDDB occurrence is from 2006 located approximately 9.3 km northeast from the evaluation area. Therefore, WTK has moderate potential to nest directly adjacent to the site.

Protected Avian Species
Raptors and other nesting birds are protected under the California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA.

While the life histories of these species vary, overlapping nesting and foraging similarities allow for their concurrent discussion. Most raptors are breeding residents throughout most of the wooded portions of the state. Stands of live oak, riparian deciduous, or other forest habitats, as well as open grasslands, are used most frequently for nesting. Smaller avian species may also nest in scrub habitats and urban areas.

Breeding occurs February through September, with peak activity May through July. Various raptors and avian species, such as red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus), California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), and sparrows (Zonotrichia sp.), have the potential to nest within the trees present within and directly adjacent to the evaluation area.
205
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 52 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Regulatory Environment
Federal
Federal Endangered Species Act: Provisions of the ESA of 1973 (16 USC 1532 et seq., as amended) protect federally listed threatened or endangered species and their habitats from unlawful take. Listed species include those for which proposed and final rules are published in the Federal Register. The ESA is administered by the Service or National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ("NOAA") National Marine Fisheries Service ("NMFS"). In general, NMFS is responsible for the protection of ESA-listed marine species and anadromous fish, whereas other listed species are under Service jurisdiction.

Section 9 of ESA prohibits the take of any fish or wildlife species listed under ESA as endangered or threatened. Take, as defined by ESA, is “to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to engage in any such conduct.” The ESA defines harm as “any act that kills or injures the fish or wildlife…including significant habitat modification or degradation that significantly impairs essential behavioral patterns of fish or wildlife.” Additionally, Section 9 prohibits removing, digging up, and maliciously damaging or destroying federally listed plants on sites under federal jurisdiction. Section 9 does not prohibit the take of federally listed plants on sites not under federal jurisdiction. If there is the potential for incidental take of a federally listed fish or wildlife species, take of listed species can be authorized through either the Section 7 consultation process for federal actions or a Section 10 incidental take permit process for non-federal actions. Federal agency actions include activities on federal land, conducted by a federal agency, funded by a federal agency, or authorized by a federal agency (including issuance of federal permits).

Clean Water Act. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) and U.S. EPA regulate discharge of dredged and fill material into waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).

Waters of the U.S. are defined broadly as waters susceptible to use in commerce (including waters subject to tides, interstate waters, and interstate wetlands) and other waters (such as interstate lakes, rivers, streams, mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds) (33 CFR 328.3). Potential wetland areas are identified as “those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils conditions.”
Under Section 401 of the CWA, any applicant receiving a Section 404 permit from the USACE must also obtain a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB. A Section 401 Water Quality Certification is issued when a project is demonstrated to comply with state water quality standards and other aquatic resource protection requirements.

State
California Endangered Species Act: The CESA was enacted in 1984. The California Code of Regulations (Title 14, §670.5) lists animal species considered endangered or threatened by the state. Sec. 2090 of CESA requires state agencies to comply with endangered species protection and recovery and to promote conservation of these species. Sec. 2080 of the Fish and Game Code prohibits "take" of any species the commission determines to be an endangered species or a threatened species. Sec. 86 of the Fish and Game Code defines “take” as "hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, 206
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 53 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
catch, capture, or kill." Section 2081 Incidental Take Permit from the CDFW may be obtained to authorize “take” of any state listed species.

California Native Plant Protection Act: The CNPPA of 1977 directed CDFW to conduct the legislature’s intent to “preserve, protect and enhance rare and Endangered plants in the State." The CNPPA prohibits importing rare and Endangered plants into California, taking rare and Endangered plants, and selling rare and Endangered plants. The CESA and CNPPA authorized the Fish and Game Commission to designate endangered, threatened, and rare species and to regulate the taking of these species (Sec. 2050-2098, Fish and Game Code). Plants listed as rare under the CNPPA are not protected under CESA; however, these plants may not be taken or possessed at any time and no licenses or permits may be issued for their take except for collecting these species for necessary scientific research.

California Fish and Game Code: Sec. 3503 of the Fish and Game Code states that it is “unlawful to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto.” Sec. 3503.5 prohibits the killing, possession, or destruction of any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds-of-prey). Sec. 3511 prohibits the take or possession of fully protected birds. Sec. 3513 prohibits the take or possession of any migratory nongame birds designated under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Sec. 3800 prohibits the take of nongame birds.

The classification of Fully Protected was the state's initial effort in the 1960's to identify and provide additional protection to those animals that were rare or faced extinction. Lists were created for fish (Sec. 5515), mammals (Sec.4700), amphibians and reptiles (Sec.5050), and birds (Sec.3511). Most Fully Protected species have also been listed as threatened or endangered species under the more recent endangered species laws and regulations. Fully Protected species may not be taken or possessed at any time and no licenses or permits may be issued for their take except for collecting these species for necessary scientific research and relocation of the bird species for the protection of livestock.

The CDFW also maintains a list of wildlife “species of special concern.” Although these species have no legal status, the CDFW recommends considering these species during analysis of project impacts to protect declining populations and avoid the need to list them as endangered in the future.

Local
City of Soledad General Plan: The following polices from the Conservation and Open Space Element of the City’s General Plan are applicable to the Proposed Project:

C/OS9: The City shall support the preservation and enhancement of natural landforms, natural vegetation, and natural resources to the maximum extent feasible.

C/OS10: The City shall support State and federal laws and policies to preserve populations of rare, threatened, and endangered species by ensuring development does not adversely affect such species in a significant way or by fully mitigating adverse effects.

C/OS11: The City shall require that significant natural, open space, and cultural resources be identified in advance of development and incorporated into site-specific development project design to the extent feasible.
207
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 54 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
C/OS12: The City shall require developers to use native and compatible non-native species, especially drought tolerant species, to the extent possible in fulfilling landscaping requirements imposed as conditions of project approvals or project mitigations. 2010 Monterey County General Plan: The following goals and policies of the 2010 Monterey County General Plan would apply to portions of the Proposed Project:

Goal OS-4: Protect and Conserve the Quality of Coastal, Marine, and River Environments, as Applied in Areas Not in the Coastal Zone.

Policy OS-4.1: Federal and State listed native marine and freshwater species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant shall be protected. Species designated in Area Plans shall also be protected.

Policy OS-4.2: Direct and indirect discharges of harmful substances into marine waters, rivers or streams shall not exceed state or federal standards.

Policy OS-4.3: Estuaries, salt and freshwater marshes, tide pools, wetlands, sloughs, river and stream mouth areas, plus all waterways that drain and have impact on State designated Areas of Special Biological Significance (“ASBS”) shall be protected, maintained, and preserved in accordance with state and federal water quality regulations.

Goal OS-5: Conserve Listed Species, Critical Habitat, Habitat and Species Protected in Area Plans; Avoid, Minimize and Mitigate Significant Impacts to Biological Resources.

Policy OS-5.3: Development shall be carefully planned to provide for the conservation and maintenance of critical habitat.

Policy OS-5.4: Development shall avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to listed species and critical habitat to the extent feasible. Measures may include but are not limited to:
a. clustering lots for development to avoid critical habitat areas, b. dedications of permanent conservation easements; or
c. other appropriate means.

If development may affect listed species, consultation with United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) and California Department of Fish and Game (“CDFG”) may be required and impacts may be mitigated by expanding the resource elsewhere on-site or in close proximity off-site. Final mitigation requirements would be determined as required by law.

Policy OS-5.6: Native and native compatible species, especially drought resistant species, shall be utilized in fulfilling landscaping requirements.

Policy OS-5.12: The California Department of Fish and Game shall be consulted and appropriate measures shall be taken to protect Areas of Special Biological Significance (ASBS). 208
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 55 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Policy OS-5.16: A biological study shall be required for any development project requiring a discretionary permit and having the potential to substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species.

An ordinance establishing minimum standards for a biological study and biological surveys shall be enacted. A biological study shall include a field reconnaissance performed at the appropriate time of year. Based on the results of the biological study, biological surveys may be necessary to identify, describe, and delineate the habitats or species that are potentially impacted. Feasible measures to reduce significant impacts to a less than significant level shall be adopted as conditions of approval.

Policy OS-5.18: Prior to disturbing any federal or state jurisdictional areas, all applicable federal and state permitting requirements shall be met, including all mitigation measures for development of jurisdictional areas and associated riparian habitats.

Policy OS-5.24: The County shall require discretionary projects to retain movement corridors of adequate size and habitat quality to allow for continued wildlife use based on the needs of the species occupying the habitat. The County shall require that expansion of its roadways and public infrastructure projects provide movement opportunities for terrestrial wildlife and ensure that existing stream channels and riparian corridors continue to provide for wildlife movement and access.

Policy OS-5.25: Occupied nests of statutorily protected migratory birds and raptors shall not be disturbed during the breeding season (generally February 1 to September 15). The county shall
A. Consult, or require the developer to consult, with a qualified biologist prior to any site preparation or construction work in order to:
(1) determine whether work is proposed during nesting season for migratory birds or raptors,
(2) determine whether site vegetation is suitable to nesting migratory birds or raptors,
(3) identify any regulatory requirements for setbacks or other avoidance measures for migratory birds and raptors which could nest on the site, and (4) establish project-specific requirements for setbacks, lock-out periods, or other methods of avoidance of disruption of nesting birds.

B. Require the development to follow the recommendations of the biologist. This measure may be implemented in one of two ways:
(1) preconstruction surveys may be conducted to identify active nests and, if found, adequate buffers shall be provided to avoid active nest disruption until after the young have fledged; or
(2) vegetation removal may be conducted during the non-breeding season (generally September 16 to January 31); however, removal of vegetation along waterways shall require approval of all appropriate local, state, and federal agencies.
209
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 56 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
This policy shall not apply in the case of an emergency fire event requiring tree removal.

This policy shall apply for tree removal that addresses fire safety planning, since removal can be scheduled to reduce impacts to migratory birds and raptors.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
   
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
   
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
   
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
   
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
   
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
   
Impact Discussion
Criteria “b” and “c” were not evaluated for impacts to sensitive habitats or impacts to protected wetlands because these resources are not present within the evaluation area. Criterion “e” was not evaluated for conflicts with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance because the project will not require tree removal. Criterion “f” was not evaluated for conflicts with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan, because the evaluation area is not located within any such plan area.
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, 210
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 57 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Congdon’s tarplant has the potential to occur within suitable habitat within the evaluation area. (Appendix D). Excavation and trenching activities associated with the Project along Morisoli Road and within the WRF and Toledo Park may result in damage or loss of any individuals growing within the site at the time of construction. This is a potentially significant impact that can be minimized to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2.

Salinas pocket mouse, a CDFW species of special concern, has the potential to occur within or adjacent to the evaluation area. Shrubs within the parks that will receive new service lines and updated irrigation may be utilized by burrowing Salinas pocket mouse. Direct impacts such as excavation and shrub removal, as well as indirect impacts from construction activities (e.g., noise, vibrations) could result in injury, den abandonment, and/or mortality of Salinas pocket mouse if burrowing within or directly adjacent to the evaluation area during construction activities. This is a potentially significant impact that can be minimized to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1.

San Joaquin whipsnake have the potential to occur adjacent to the evaluation area. Construction activities associated with the staging area could result in direct mortality of this species if they were to disperse from the adjacent habitat. This would be a potentially significant impact that can be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-3.

The Project is not expected to result in tree removal or direct impacts to raptors or other nesting birds, including WTK. However, it is possible that the final Project design may require tree removal. In addition, indirect impacts from construction activities (e.g., noise, vibrations) could result in injury, nest abandonment, and/or mortality of raptors and other nesting birds, if nesting within or directly adjacent to the evaluation area during construction activities. This is a potentially significant impact that can be minimized to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-4.

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: A qualified biologist will conduct an Employee Education Program for the construction crew prior to any construction activities. The qualified biologist will meet with the construction crew at the onset of construction at the evaluation area to educate the construction crew on the following: 1) the appropriate access route(s) in and out of the construction area and review Project boundaries; 2) how a biological monitor will examine the area and agree upon a method which will ensure the safety of the monitor during such activities, 3) the identification of special status species that may be present; 4) the specific mitigation measures that will be incorporated into the construction effort; 5) the general provisions and protections afforded; and 6) the proper procedures if a special status species is encountered within the Project site to avoid impacts.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2: A qualified biologist will conduct protocol-level surveys for Congdon’s tarplant and Salinas pocket mouse within the Project boundaries within the WRF and within the agricultural/ruderal habitat prior to construction. Protocol-level surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist at the appropriate time of year for species with the potential to occur within the site. A report describing the results of the surveys shall be provided to the project proponents prior to any ground disturbing activities. The report shall include but is not limited to 1) a description of the species observed, if any; 2) map of the location, if observed; and 3) recommended avoidance and minimization measures, if applicable. 211
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 58 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Prior to construction activities in the staging area, a qualified biologist will conduct a clearance survey in suitable habitat within the Survey Area for San Joaquin whipsnake. If San Joaquin whipsnake is observed during construction, measures will be taken to avoid the individual(s) and the species will be allowed to leave on its own volition or will be relocated outside of the survey area by the qualified biologist.

Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Project activities that may affect protected nesting avian species (e.g., tree removal, noise, vibrations) shall be scheduled after September 15 and before February 1 to avoid the avian breeding and nesting season. Alternatively, a qualified biologist shall be retained by the Project applicant to conduct pre-construction surveys for nesting raptors and other protected avian species within 300 feet of proposed Project activities if work occurs between February 1 and September 15. Pre-construction surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the start of Project activities during the early part of the breeding season (February through April) and no more than 30 days prior to the initiation of these activities during the late part of the breeding season (May through September). Because some bird species nest early in spring and others nest later in summer, and because some species breed multiple times in a season, surveys for nesting birds may be required to continue during Project activities to address new arrivals. If Project activities are halted for more than 14 days during the avian nesting season, additional surveys shall be conducted. The necessity and timing of these continued surveys shall be determined by the qualified biologist.

If raptors or other protected avian species nests are identified during the pre-construction surveys, the qualified biologist shall notify the Project applicant and an appropriate no-disturbance buffer shall be imposed within which no disturbance should take place (generally 300 feet in all directions for raptors; other avian species may have species-specific requirements) until the young of the year have fledged and are no longer reliant upon the nest or parental care for survival, as determined by a qualified biologist. b. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project would have no impact to riparian or other sensitive habitats because these resources are not present within the site.
c. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? The Project would have no impact to protected wetlands because this resource is not present within the site.
212
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 59 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
d. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
The evaluation area lies within an existing residential community and active agricultural land and is not located within a migratory wildlife corridor. The Project consists of the replacement of existing infrastructure and alterations to already developed land and would not result in the construction of any new development or impervious surfaces. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not interfere with the movement of any native resident or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native nursery sites. This impact is less than significant, and no mitigation is required.
e. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The Proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, because the project will not require tree removal.
f. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The Proposed Project is not located within an area included in an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

4.5 Cultural Resources
Basin Research Associates, Inc. (“BASIN”) prepared a Cultural Resources Assessment Report for the Proposed Project in August 2024.2 The Cultural Resources Assessment Report includes the results of background research and field reconnaissance of the Proposed Project’s Area of Potential Effect (“APE”).

Background research consisted of a records search from the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University (“NWIC”), a Sacred Lands File (“SLF”) search with the Native American Heritage Commission (“NAHC”), and Native American consultation in support of consultation under AB 52. The field reconnaissance consisted of a pedestrian survey of the APE on July 12, 2024, which investigated the APE for cultural and Tribal cultural resources.

Environmental Setting
The Project area is located in the Salinas Valley with the Gabilan Range on the east and the Sierra de Salinas on the west. The most prominent natural feature is the Salinas River which divides the South County down the middle. This shallow water course is 155 miles long prone to wide displacement during intermittent seasonal flow. It is the principal river in Monterey County and flows for 170 miles from the midpoint of San Luis Obispo County northwest through Monterey County to the Monterey Bay.

Numerous creeks and streams from the neighboring mountains feed into the Salinas River. The Project is 2 Due to the potentially confidential nature of items in this report, this study is not included in the IS/MND. Qualified personnel may request a copy of this report from the City.
213
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 60 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
located within the portion of Monterey County that is hot and dry, in contrast to cool and moist along the coast.

There are numerous historic resources spread throughout the County. A search of the NWIC identified 19 reports in or adjacent to the WRF and pipeline alignments with 15 additional reports within 0.5 mile.

No prehistoric or combined prehistoric or historic era sites or built environment resources have been recorded or reported in or adjacent to the Proposed Project. Five resources, all historic built environment structures, have been recorded within 0.5 mile of the Proposed Project.

The most recent Monterey County archaeological sensitivity map (Monterey County, 2024) shows a “low” sensitivity in the vicinity of Soledad. The City’s Environmental Impact Report for the 2005 General Plan indicates that the potential for historic era archaeological resources is low, as only one historical site/resource is shown to be within the vicinity of the City. The potential for exposing significant subsurface archaeological materials during pipeline construction appears minimal based on the review of the available sensitivity mapping, the lack of NRHP and CRHR as well as local register resources and the absence of any unexpected construction discoveries over the past 50 years.

BASIN’s pedestrian survey of the Proposed Project APE did not encounter evidence of archaeological deposits or other potential cultural resources. The results of the SLF records search were negative for potential cultural sensitivity within the Proposed Project APE (BASIN, 2024).

Regulatory Environment
State
California Environmental Quality Act: CEQA requires regulatory compliance for projects involving historic resources throughout the State. Under CEQA, public agencies must consider the effects of their actions on historic resources (Public Resources Code, Section 21084.1). The CEQA Guidelines define a significant resource as any resource listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (“California Register”) [see Public Resources Code, Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 (a) and (b)].

California Public Resources Code: Several sections of the California PRC protect cultural resources located on public land. Under PRC Section 5097.5, no person shall knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy, injure, or deface, any historic or prehistoric ruins, burial grounds, archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site (including fossilized footprints), inscriptions made by human agency, rock art, or any other archaeological, paleontological, or historical feature situated on public lands, except with the express permission of the public agency that has jurisdiction over the lands. Violation of this section is a misdemeanor.

PRC Section 5097.98 states that if Native American human remains are identified within a project area, the landowner must work with the Native American Most Likely Descendant as identified by the NAHC to develop a plan for the treatment or disposition of the human remains and any items associated with Native American burials with appropriate dignity. These procedures are also addressed in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 prohibits disinterring, disturbing, or removing human remains from a location other than a dedicated cemetery.

Section 30244 of the PRC requires reasonable mitigation for impacts on paleontological and archaeological resources that occur because of development on public lands. 214
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 61 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
California Health and Safety Code: California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 regulates the treatment of human remains. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site, or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner of the county in which the human remains are discovered has determined that the remains are not subject to his or her authority. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact the NAHC by telephone within 24 hours.

California Assembly Bill 52: AB 52, in effect since July 2015, provides CEQA protections for Tribal cultural resources. All lead agencies approving projects under CEQA are required, if formally requested by a culturally affiliated California Native American Tribe, to consult with such Tribe regarding the potential impact of a project on Tribal cultural resources before releasing an environmental document.

Under California Public Resources Code Sec. 21074, Tribal cultural resources include site features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, or objects that are of cultural value to a Tribe and that are eligible for or listed on the California Register of Historic Resources or a local historic register, or that the lead agency has determined to be of significant Tribal cultural value.

Local
City of Soledad General Plan: The following polices from the Conservation and Open Space Element of the City’s General Plan are applicable to the Proposed Project:

C/OS23: If development of a site uncovers cultural resources, the recommendations of Appendix K of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 15000 et seq.) shall be followed for identification, documentation, and preservation of the resource.

C/OS24: The City shall document and record data or information relevant to prehistoric and historic cultural resources which may be impacted by proposed development. The accumulation of such data shall act as a tool to assist decisionmakers in determinations of the potential development effects to prehistoric and historical resources located within the City.
2010 Monterey County General Plan: The following policies of the 2010 Monterey County General Plan are applicable to portions of the Proposed Project.

Policy OS-7.1: Important representative and unique paleontological sites and features shall be identified and protected. Developers shall be required to complete Phase I (reconnaissance level) paleontological reviews in any formation known to yield important elements of the fossil record. If significant fossil deposits are found during grading activities, data recovery shall be required to obtain a sample of materials from such deposits prior to their systematic destruction.

Policy OS-7.4: Development proposed in low sensitivity zones are not required to have a paleontological survey unless there is specific additional information that suggests paleontological resources are present.
215
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 62 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Policy OS-8.1: Unique burial sites shall be identified and protected. All Native Californian cemeteries, burials, shrine sites, and sacred place locations shall be preserved in place to the greatest extent possible and as permitted by law. In cases where such sites and locations cannot be retained in place without modification, governing requirements in the Government Code, Health and Safety Code, California Environmental Quality Act and Native American Religious Freedom Act shall be taken into account in consulting with local Native Californian Tribal Groups with documented aboriginal ties to the study area and shall be carried out, as necessary, with the assistance and input of the California Native American Heritage Commission. Documentation of descent shall be based on Genealogical Proof Standards.

Policy OS-8.3: Development proposed at sites where known burials or human cemeteries are located shall in no case modify, disturb, excavate, or develop in such locations until all steps in compliance with CEQA, Native American Heritage Commission, Health and Safety Code and Government Code, and in accordance with any completed MOU with a local Tribe, have been completed. Routine and Ongoing Agricultural Activities are exempted from this policy in so far as allowed by state or federal law. In the case of any conflict of interpretation, state requirements for the protection of burial sites are applicable and shall be implemented in good faith.

Policy OS-8.4: Policies and procedures shall be established that encourage development to avoid impacts to burial sites including:
a. Designing or clustering development to avoid archaeological deposits that typically contain human remains and to avoid any known cemeteries or other concentrations of human remains;
b. Requiring dedication of permanent conservation easements if subdivisions and other developments can be planned to provide for such protective easements; c. In all cases where human remains are identified through CEQA review, archaeological research, ethnohistoric research, inadvertent grading disturbance, or historic record research, the County shall consult with the designated “most likely descendants” as identified by any Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) adopted pursuant to Policy OS-8.7. In the event no MOU is executed, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be consulted to help determine the appropriate Tribal Group in that portion of the County where the burial remains are identified.

Policy OS-8.6: Tribal representatives will be consulted, consistent with state preservation law, about the location of sacred places, ancestral sites, archaeological remains of village sites, burial and cemetery sites, and other significant cultural resources during the preparation of any General Plan amendment, Master Plan, Community Plan, or Specific Plan.
216
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 63 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5?    
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?     c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of dedicated cemeteries?    
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5?
CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15064.5 defines a historical resource as one being listed in or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 states that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. No prehistoric or combined prehistoric or historic era sites or built environment resources have been recorded or reported in or adjacent to the Proposed Project. Five resources, all historic built environment structures, have been recorded within 0.5 mile of the Proposed Project.

However, the Project would not affect these five resources. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not impact a historical resource.
b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Section 21083.2 of the Public Resources Code requires lead agencies to assess potential impacts to archaeological resources and determine whether a project may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. BASIN conducted a records search at the NWIC, an SLF search with the NAHC, and completed a visual inspection of the Proposed Project APE. Additionally, BASIN reviewed the Proposed Project site geology and soil characterizations. BASIN did not observe archaeological resources, and none have been previously recorded within the Proposed Project APE.

While unlikely, unrecorded archaeological resources could be present below ground surface and such resources could be exposed or damaged during Project construction. Therefore, to ensure impacts remain less than significant, the Proposed Project would implement Mitigation Measure CUL-1.

Mitigation Measure CUL-1: The City of Soledad shall note on any plans that require ground disturbing excavation that there is a potential for exposing buried cultural resources including prehistoric Native American burials. Archaeological site information supplied to the Contractor shall be considered confidential.

The City of Soledad shall retain a Professional Archaeologist on an “on-call” basis during ground disturbing construction to review, identify, and evaluate cultural resources that may be inadvertently exposed during construction. The archaeologist shall review and evaluate any 217
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 64 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
discoveries to determine if they are historical resource(s) and/or unique archaeological resources or Tribal cultural resources under CEQA.

If the Professional Archaeologist determines that any cultural resources exposed during construction constitute a historical resource and/or unique archaeological resource or Tribal cultural resource under CEQA, he/she shall notify the City of Soledad and other appropriate parties of the evaluation. The Professional Archaeologist shall recommend mitigation measures to mitigate to less than significant in accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 15064.5. Tribal cultural resources shall be evaluated with the assistance of Native American tribes and/or individual Tribal members who have previously been contacted and responded to outreach efforts by the City of Soledad. Mitigation measures may include avoidance, preservation in-place, recordation, additional archaeological testing and data recovery among other options. The completion of a formal Archaeological Monitoring Plan (AMP) and/or Archaeological Treatment Plan (ATP) that may include data recovery may be recommended by the Professional Archaeologist if significant archaeological deposits (or Tribal cultural resources) are exposed during ground disturbing construction. Development and implementation of the AMP and ATP, and treatment of significant cultural resources and/or Tribal cultural resources will be determined by the City of Soledad in consultation with any regulatory agencies and Native American Tribes and Tribal individuals.

A Monitoring Closure Report shall be filed with the City of Soledad at the conclusion of ground disturbing construction if archaeological and Native American monitoring was undertaken. c. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
No known human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated or formal cemeteries, are known to occur on the Proposed Project site. Additionally, Native Americans were consulted during the preparation of the Cultural Resources Report (see Section 4.17, Tribal Cultural Resources). The results of an SLF for the Proposed Project APE were negative. As a result, the APE is considered unlikely to contain Native American remains. However, while the likelihood of human remains, including Native American remains and/or those interred outside of a formal cemetery, within the Proposed Project site is low, it is possible that previously unknown human remains may be present. Construction may impact previously unknown remains. To minimize potential impacts to less than significant, mitigation is necessary. The implementation of the following mitigation measure would ensure potential adverse impacts would be avoided.

Mitigation Measure CUL-2: The treatment of human remains and any associated or unassociated funerary objects discovered during any soil-disturbing activity within the project site shall comply with applicable State laws. This shall include immediate notification of the Monterey County Sheriff’s Office and the City of Soledad.

In the event of the coroner's determination that the human remains are Native American, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, is required who shall appoint a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) (PRC Section 5097.98).

The City of Soledad, Professional Archaeologist and MLD shall make all reasonable efforts to develop an agreement for the treatment, with appropriate dignity, of human remains and associated or 218
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 65 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
unassociated funerary objects (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(d)). The agreement should take into consideration the appropriate excavation, removal, recordation, analysis, custodianship, curation, and final disposition of the human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects. The California PRC allows 48 hours to reach agreement on these matters. If the MLD and the other parties do not agree on the reburial method, the project will follow PRC Section 5097.98(b) which states that ". . . the landowner or his or her authorized representative shall reinter the human remains and items associated with Native American burials with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance."

4.6 Energy
Environmental Setting
Pacific Gas and Electric (“PG&E”) provides electricity and natural gas throughout Monterey County, and thus would be the energy utility provider of the Proposed Project site. Beginning in 2018, all PG&E customers in Monterey, San Benito, and Santa Cruz Counties were automatically enrolled in Central Coast Community Energy (“3CE”) (previously known as Monterey Bay Community Power [“MBCP”]). 3CE is a community choice energy agency that has committed to providing its customers with 100% carbonfree energy by the year 2030 (3CE, 2023). Community choice energy agencies allow local governments to procure power on behalf of their residents, businesses, and municipal accounts from an alternative supplier while still receiving transmission and distribution service from their existing utility provider (in this case, PG&E). This is typically an attractive option for communities that want more local control over their electricity sources, more clean energy than their default utility offers, and/or lower electricity prices. Per Public Utilities Code Section 366.2, customers have the right to opt out of the community choice energy program and continue to receive service from the incumbent utility (PG&E) if they so choose.

Regulatory Environment
State
California Renewable Energy Standards: In 2002, California established their Renewables Portfolio Standard Program, with the goal of increasing the percentage of renewable energy in the State's electricity mix to 20 percent of retail sales by 2017 through enactment of Senate Bill (“SB”) 1078 (CPUC, 2023). In 2006, SB 107 revised previous elements of the Public Utilities Code so the amount of renewable energy generated per year and sold to retail customers would amount to 20 percent by 2010 (SB 107, 2006). In 2008, the governor issued Executive Order S-14-08 and requires that retail sellers of electricity serve 33 percent of their load with renewable energy by 2020 (Governor Schwarzenegger, 2008). In October 2015, Governor Brown signed SB 350 to codify California’s climate and clean energy goals. A key provision of SB 350 requires retail sellers and publicly owned utilities to procure 50 percent of the State’s electricity from renewable sources by 2030 (CPUC, 2023).

California Building Codes: At the State level, the California Legislature established the Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, as specified in Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. Title 24 is updated approximately every three years. Compliance with Title 24 is mandatory at the time new building permits are issued by city and county governments. The California Green Building Standards Code (“CalGreen”) establishes mandatory green building standards for all 219
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 66 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
buildings in California. The code covers five categories: planning and design, energy efficiency, water efficiency and conservation, material conservation and resource efficiency, and indoor environmental quality. Title 24 was last updated in 2022.

Local
City of Soledad General Plan: There are no applicable policies or goals from the City’s General Plan. 2010 Monterey County General Plan: There are no policies or goals from the 2010 Monterey County General Plan related to energy use that would be applicable to the Proposed Project.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
   
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?    
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Energy use associated with the Proposed Project would not constitute an adverse effect under CEQA, as described below.

Construction
The Proposed Project would require energy for the procurement and transportation of materials, as well as site preparation during construction. Petroleum-based fuels such as diesel fuel and gasoline would be the primary sources of energy for these activities. The Proposed Project would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy because: 1) the construction schedule and phased approach is designed to be efficient to avoid excess monetary costs, and 2) energy demand associated with construction would be temporary in nature. As a result, construction of the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact related to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources.

Operation
The Proposed Project would generate energy demand associated with the operation of the recycled water distribution system, as well as regular maintenance trips. City Public Works already maintains a distribution system in the vicinity of the Project area. The Proposed Project is not anticipated to result in substantial additional vehicle trips for maintenance. As a result, the operational increases from vehicle trips for maintenance trips and would be negligible compared to existing conditions. 220
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 67 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
The Proposed Project components, including the recycled water pump station at the WRF, could generate additional energy demand during operation. These facilities would be designed to comply with applicable portions of the California Green Building Code, Title 24 energy efficiency requirements, and current California Building Energy Standards requirements. In conclusion, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant operational impact related to the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources. b. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
See Response a. above. Construction and operation of the Proposed Project would be subject to existing state energy standards and would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The Proposed Project would be designed to comply with applicable portions of the California Green Building Code, Title 24 energy efficiency requirements, and current California Building Energy Standards requirements. The Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact related to energy usage and efficiency.

4.7 Geology and Soils
Environmental Setting
The Proposed Project area is not in an Alquist-Priolo Act zone but is in a seismically active region. The nearest quaternary fault to the Project area is the Reliz fault zone located approximately four miles southeast of the southernmost Project components. Additionally, the Pinnacles fault and a small unnamed fault lie approximately six and 3.5 miles northwest of the Project site, respectively (Monterey County, 2024).

The Proposed Project site is composed primarily of Arroyo Seco gravelly sandy loam, Chualar Loam, Gloria sandy loam, and Cropley silty clay. All three soil types are typical of alluvial deposits and share similar characteristics. These soils are generally well- or moderately well-drained with relatively slow permeability. Runoff potential varies between the three soil types. The Arroyo Seco series consists of sandy and gravelly alluvium with very slow runoff potential; the Chualar series consists of alluvium from mixed parent sources and has slow to medium runoff potential; and the Gloria series consists of fine gravel formed from granitic parent material runoff potential ranging from slow to rapid. All three soil types are considered suitable for various agricultural uses (UC Davis, 2024).

The Proposed Project is located on flat land within the City of Soledad’s roadway ROWs and WRF and an agricultural easement located in a portion of unincorporated Monterey County that is developed with dirt access roads. The Project area has low landslide susceptibility and is an area with a low erosion hazard rating. However, some areas of the Proposed Project – primarily components located at the WRF – are in areas of moderate or high liquefaction susceptibility (Monterey County, 2024).

Crawford and Associates, Inc. prepared a geotechnical study for the Proposed Project in July 2024, contained in Appendix E, Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology Report. 221
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 68 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Regulatory Environment
Federal
National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program: Implemented by FEMA, the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (“NEHRP”) pursues research, development, and implementation of earthquake mitigation measures. Passed in 1977, NEHRP is a collaborative effort between federal, state, local governments, universities, research centers, professional societies, trade associations, and businesses. FEMA is the primary agency implementing the research and development of earthquake measures and safety materials. Implementation of these measures and materials is accomplished through the following:
 Providing federal grant programs for states and local governments to implement earthquake mitigating measures;
 engaging businesses, through the QuakeSmart program;
 providing Multi-State National Earthquake Assistance grants for public education of mitigation activities;
 collaborating with universities and non-profit organizations to encourage enforcement of building codes and use of seismic rehabilitation at a regional level;  training for earthquake readiness and mitigation through National Earthquake Technical Assistance Program;
 providing educational materials and research reports through the FEMA Library.

NEHRP has no regulatory authority and therefore cannot enforce national earthquake standards. All the program’s provisions are incumbent upon the state, local government, and business to adopt as appropriate (FEMA, 2023; Locascio, 2023).

State
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act: The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, passed in 1972, seeks to mitigate surface faulting's hazard to structures for human occupancy. In accordance with this act, the State Geologist established regulatory zones, called “earthquake fault zones,” around the surface traces of active faults and published maps showing these zones. In these zones, buildings for human occupancy cannot be constructed across the surface traces of active faults. Because many active faults are complex and consist of more than one branch, each earthquake fault zone extends approximately 200 to 500 feet on either side of the mapped fault trace.

Title 14 of the CCR, Section 3601(e), defines buildings intended for human occupancy as those that would be inhabited for more than 2,000 hours per year. The Proposed Project does not cross an AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, these provisions of the Act do not apply to the Proposed Project.

Seismic Hazards Mapping Act: The purpose of the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act of 1990 (PRC Sections 2690–2699.6) is to reduce damage resulting from earthquakes. The Seismic Hazards Mapping Act addresses earthquake-related hazards, including strong ground shaking, liquefaction, and seismically induced landslides. The state is charged with identifying and mapping areas at risk of strong ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, and other corollary hazards. Cities and counties are required to regulate development in mapped Seismic Hazard Zones. Under the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act, permit 222
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 69 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
review is the primary mechanism for local regulation of development. Specifically, cities and counties are prohibited from issuing development permits for sites in Seismic Hazard Zones until appropriate sitespecific geologic and/or geotechnical investigations have been conducted and measures to reduce potential damage have been incorporated into the development plans.

Local
City of Soledad General Plan: The Safety Element of the City’s General Plan contains the following policies applicable to portions of the Proposed Project:

HZ-5: All new development shall satisfy the applicable requirements of the Uniform Building Code.

HZ-6: The City shall require the preparation of a soils engineering and geologic seismic analysis prior to permitting development in areas prone to geologic or seismic hazards (i.e., ground shaking, landslides, liquefaction, expansive soils). 2010 Monterey County General Plan: The following policies from the 2010 Monterey County General Plan would be applicable to portions of the Proposed Project.

Policy OS-3.1: Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent and repair erosion damage shall be established and enforced.

Policy S-1.1: Land uses shall be sited and measures applied to reduce the potential for loss of life, injury, property damage, and economic and social dislocations resulting from ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, and other geologic hazards in the high and moderate hazard susceptibility areas.

Policy S-1.3: Site-specific geologic studies may be used to verify the presence or absence and extent of the hazard on the property proposed for new development and to identify mitigation measures for any development proposed. An ordinance including permit requirements relative to the siting and design of structures and grading relative to seismic hazards shall be established.

Policy S-1.4: The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act shall be enforced.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault?
   
223
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 70 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?    
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?    
iv) Landslides?    
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?     c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
   
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
   
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
   
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?    
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
a.i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
The Proposed Project is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Additionally, there are no faults or fault zone hazard areas identified by the County of Monterey in the vicinity of the Project.

The Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques. No impact from the Project would occur. a.ii)Strong seismic ground shaking?
The Proposed Project is located in a seismically active region. The nearest active fault is the San Andreas fault, located approximately 10 miles northeast of the Proposed Project area (Department of Conservation, 2024a). As a result, the Proposed Project could be subject to seismically induced hazards during its design lifetime. To minimize potential seismically induced hazards, the Proposed Project would be designed to comply with all standard engineering and seismic safety design requirements and guidelines contained in the Uniform Building Code and California Building Code (“CBC”). However, the Proposed Project would involve expansion of recycled water distribution across the City and does not include the addition of any new habitable structures. Additionally, the final design of the Proposed Project would be required to comply with the recommendations of the design-level geotechnical analysis (Appendix E). This would include, but is not limited to, implementation of Occupational Safety 224
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 71 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
and Health Administration (“OSHA”) slopping requirements during trenching, shoring, and dewatering.

In addition, the Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques of the 2022 California Building Code adopted by the County of Monterey. Compliance with existing building code requirements, standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques, as well as the recommendations of the design-level geotechnical report would ensure that potential impacts would be minimized. The Proposed Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death from strong seismic ground shaking. This represents a less than significant impact. a.iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Surface ground rupture occurs at sites that are traversed by or lie very near an active fault. The Proposed Project is not located in any mapped earthquake fault zones (Department of Conservation, 2024a). Therefore, there is a low potential for surface ground rupture within the Proposed Project area.

The geotechnical study in Appendix E analyzed site soils and determined that the soils within the new recycled water pump station component of the Proposed Project at the existing WRF site have the potential to result in liquefaction. To ensure impacts associated with of seismic related ground failure (including liquefaction) are minimized, the new recycled water pump station component of the Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with the recommendations of the design-level geotechnical report. Additionally, all components of the Proposed Project would be constructed in accordance with applicable standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques contained in the Uniform Building Code and CBC. The Proposed Project is the expansion of recycled water distribution across the City and does not include the addition of any new habitable structures.

For the reasons provided above, the Proposed Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death from seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. Therefore, this represents a less than significant impact. a.iv) Landslides?
Landslides are common in Monterey County due to the combination of uplifting mountains, fractured and weak rocks, and periodic intense rainfall along the coast. The level of susceptibility of an area is dependent on the local geologic conditions. The Proposed Project area is generally flat and is considered to have a low susceptibility to landslide hazards (Monterey County, 2024). As a result, the Proposed Project is unlikely to be exposed to potential landslide hazards. In addition, the Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques of the 2022 California Building Code adopted by the County of Monterey. The Proposed Project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death from landslides, which represents a less than significant impact. b. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The County’s GIS database identifies the soils within the Proposed Project area as having a low to moderate erosion potential (Monterey County, 2024). The majority of the Project area, including the new recycled water pump station at the existing WRF plant, is classified as having low erosion susceptibility, while portions of the pipeline alignment along Gabilan Road and Toledo Street will pass through an area classified with moderate erosion susceptibility (Monterey County, 2024). To ensure 225
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 72 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
impacts remain less than significant, the Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques of the 2022 California Building Code. The Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact related to substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
c. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Soils within the new recycled water pump station component at the existing WRF site have the potential to result in liquefaction, and Project site conditions (i.e., moderate soil plasticity) have the potential for expansive soils. To ensure that the Project would minimize ground instability on- or off-site potentially resulting in liquefaction, lateral spreading, and subsidence, the new recycled water pump station component of the Proposed Project would be designed and constructed according to the recommendations of the design-level geotechnical report. All components of the Proposed Project would be constructed in accordance with all applicable standard engineering and seismic safety design techniques contained in the Uniform Building Code and CBC (see Appendix E). Furthermore, any imported fill used for the Proposed Project must adhere to the recommendations for expansive potential outlined in Appendix E. As discussed above, the Proposed Project area is generally flat and is considered to have a low susceptibility to landslide hazards, therefore; the Project site would be unlikely to experience landslide hazards (Monterey County, 2024). For these reasons, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact.
d. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Soils within the Proposed Project area have moderate plasticity (Appendix E). As a result, components of the Proposed Project could potentially be located on expansive soil. However, the Proposed Project would involve expansion of recycled water distribution across the City and would not create substantial risks to life or property as no habitable structures are proposed. In addition, any imported fill used for the Proposed Project would be required to meet the recommendations for expansive potential outlined in Appendix E. This represents a less than significant impact. e. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
The Proposed Project site does not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. The Proposed Project would involve expansion of recycled water distribution across the City and does not include the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal system; therefore no impact would occur.
f. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Significant paleontological resources are fossils or assemblages of fossils that are unique, unusual, rare, uncommon, and diagnostically or stratigraphically important, as well as those that add to an existing 226
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 73 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
body of knowledge in specific areas, stratigraphically, taxonomically, or regionally. They include fossil remains of large to very small aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates, remains of plants and animals previously not represented in certain portions of the stratigraphy and assemblages of fossils that might aid stratigraphic correlations – particularly those offering data for the interpretation of tectonic events, geomorphologic evolution, paleoclimatology, and the relationships of aquatic and terrestrial species.

Most of the fossils found in Monterey County are of marine life forms and create a record of the region’s geologic history of advancing and retreating sea levels. A review of nearly 700 known fossils localities in the County was conducted in 2001; 12 fossil sites were identified as having outstanding scientific value.

The Proposed Project site is not located on or near any of those sites based on GIS data provided by the County (Rosenberg, 2001). The Proposed Project would not directly or indirectly destroy a paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature, as none exist within the Proposed Project area. No impact would occur.

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Environmental Setting
Global temperatures are affected by naturally occurring and anthropogenic-generated atmospheric gases, such as water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) are gases that absorb and re-emit infrared radiation in the atmosphere. The gases that are widely seen as the principal contributors to human-induced climate change include carbon dioxide (“CO2”), methane (“CH4”), nitrous oxide (“N2O”), fluorinated gases such as hydrofluorocarbons (“HFCs”) and perfluorocarbons (“PFCs”), and sulfur hexafluoride (“SF6”). Water vapor is excluded from the list of GHGs because it is short-lived in the atmosphere and its atmospheric concentrations are largely determined by natural processes, such as oceanic evaporation.

Emissions of GHGs from human activities, such as electricity production, motor vehicle use, and agriculture, are elevating the concentration of GHGs in the atmosphere. GHG emissions from anthropogenic sources are causing a trend of unnatural warming of the earth’s climate, known as global warming or global climate change.

MBARD has not yet adopted a threshold for construction-related GHG emissions but recommends utilizing thresholds set by neighboring districts (e.g., Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District [“SMAQMD”]). The SMAQMD GHG threshold is defined in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent (“CO2e”), a metric that accounts for emissions from various GHGs based on their global warming potential. According to SMAQMD, a Project would result in a significant GHG-related impact if the Project would emit more than 1,100 metric tons of CO2e per year (“MTCO2e/year”). Operation of a stationary source project would not have a significant GHG impact if the project emits less than 10,000 MTCO2e/year. Climate change has a cumulative impact; a project contributes to this impact through its incremental contribution of GHG emissions combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs. If annual emissions of GHGs exceed these threshold levels, the Proposed Project would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution of GHG emissions and must implement mitigation measures (MBARD, 2016).
227
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 74 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Regulatory Environment
Federal
Federal Regulation and the Clean Air Act - Executive Order 13514: Executive Order 13514 is focused on reducing GHGs internally in federal agency missions, programs, and operations. Additionally, the executive order directs federal agencies to participate in the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, which is engaged in developing a national strategy for adaptation to climate change.

On April 2, 2007, in Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), the Supreme Court found that GHGs are air pollutants covered by the FCAA and that the U.S. EPA has the authority to regulate GHGs. The Court held that the U.S. EPA Administrator must determine whether emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution that may be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or whether the science is too uncertain to make a reasoned decision.

On December 7, 2009, the U.S. EPA Administrator signed two (2) distinct findings regarding GHGs under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act:
 Endangerment Finding: The Administrator found that the current and projected concentrations of the six (6) key well-mixed GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.  Cause or Contribute Finding: The Administrator found the combined emissions of these wellmixed GHGs from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare.

Although these findings did not impose any requirements on industry or other entities, this action was a prerequisite to finalizing the U.S. EPA’s Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for Light-Duty Vehicles published on September 15, 2009. On May 7, 2010, the final Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards was published in the Federal Register.

U.S. EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) are taking coordinated steps to enable the production of a new generation of clean vehicles with reduced GHG emissions and improved fuel efficiency from on-road vehicles and engines. These next steps include developing the first-ever GHG regulations for heavy-duty engines and vehicles and additional light-duty vehicle GHG regulations. President Obama outlined these steps in a Presidential Memorandum on May 21, 2010.

The final combined U.S. EPA and NHTSA standards making up the first phase of this national program apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. The standards require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of Carbon dioxide (“CO2”) per mile (the equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon if the automobile industry were to meet this CO2 level solely through fuel economy improvements).

Together, these standards will cut GHG emissions by an estimated 960 million metric tons (“MMT”) and

1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012- 2016). On August 28, 2012, U.S. EPA and NHTSA issued their joint rule to extend this national program of coordinated GHG and fuel economy standards to model years 2017 through 2025 passenger vehicles. 228
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 75 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
State
Assembly Bill 32 – California Global Warming Solutions Act: AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, codifies the State of California’s GHG emissions target by directing CARB to reduce the state’s global warming emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Governor Schwarzenegger signed and passed into law AB 32 on September 27, 2006. Since that time, the CARB, the California Energy Commission (“CEC”), the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”), and the Building Standards Commission (“BSC”) have all been developing regulations that will help meet the goals of AB 32 and Executive Order S-3-05.3 A Scoping Plan for AB 32 was adopted by CARB in December 2008. It contains the State of California’s main strategies to reduce GHGs from business as usual (“BAU”) emissions projected in 2020 back down to 1990 levels. BAU is the projected emissions in 2020, including increases in emissions caused by growth, without any GHG reduction measures. The Scoping Plan has a range of GHG reduction actions, including direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non-monetary incentives, voluntary actions, and market-based mechanisms such as a cap-and-trade system. This plan required CARB and other state agencies to develop and adopt regulations and other initiatives reducing GHGs by 2012.

As directed by AB 32, CARB has also approved a statewide GHG emissions limit. On December 6, 2007, CARB staff resolved an amount of 427 MMT of CO2e as the total statewide GHG 1990 emissions level and 2020 emissions limit. The limit is a cumulative statewide limit, not a sector-or facility-specific limit.

CARB updated the future 2020 BAU annual emissions forecast because of economic downturn, to 545 MMT of CO2e. Two (2) GHG emissions reduction measures currently enacted that were not previously included in the 2008 Scoping Plan baseline inventory were included, further reducing the baseline inventory to 507 MMT of CO2e. Thus, an estimated reduction of 80 MMT of CO2e is necessary to reduce statewide emissions to meet the AB 32 target by 2020.

CARB prepared an updated Scoping Plan which was released in 2017. The 2017 Scoping Plan identifies ways for California to reach the statewide 2030 climate target and next steps for reaching the 2050 target goal.

Senate Bill 1368: SB 1368 is the companion bill of AB 32 and was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger in September 2006. SB 1368 required the CPUC to establish a greenhouse gas emission performance standard. Therefore, on January 25, 2007, the CPUC adopted an interim GHG Emissions Performance Standard to help mitigate climate change. The Emissions Performance Standard is a facility-based emissions standard requiring all new long-term commitments for baseload generation to serve California consumers be with power plants that have emissions no greater than a combined cycle gas turbine plant. That level is established at 1,100 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour. "New long-term commitment" refers to new plant investments (new construction), new or renewal contracts with a term of five (5) years or more, or major investments by the utility in its existing baseload power plants.

Additionally, the CEC established a similar standard for local publicly owned utilities that cannot exceed the greenhouse gas emission rate from a baseload combined-cycle natural gas fired plant. On July 29, 2007, the Office of Administrative Law disapproved the CEC’s proposed Greenhouse Gases Emission Performance Standard rulemaking action and subsequently, the CEC revised the proposed regulations.

SB 1368 further requires that all electricity provided to California, including imported electricity, must be generated from plants that meet the standards set by the CPUC and CEC. 3 Note that AB 197 was adopted in September 2016 to provide more legislative oversight of CARB. 229
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 76 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Senate Bill 350 – Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act: In September 2015, the California Legislature passed SB 350 (de Leon 2015), which increases the State’s Renewables Portfolio Standard Program for content of electrical generation from the 33 percent target for 2020 to a 50 percent renewables target by 2030.

Executive Order S-03-05: On June 1, 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-03-05, the purpose of which was to implement requirements for the California Environmental Protection Agency (“CalEPA”) to provide ongoing reporting on a biennial basis to the State Legislature and Governor’s Office on how global warming is affecting the state. Required areas of impact reporting include public health, water supply, agriculture, coastline, and forestry. The CalEPA secretary is required to prepare and report on ongoing and upcoming mitigation designed to counteract these impacts.

Executive Order B-30-15: On April 15, 2015, Governor Brown signed Executive Order B-30-15, the purpose of which is to establish a GHG reduction of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The Executive Order intended to help the state work towards a further emissions reduction target of 80 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2050. The order directed state agencies to prepare for climate change impacts through prioritization of adaptation actions to reduce GHG emissions, preparation for uncertain climate impacts through implementation of flexible approaches, protection of vulnerable populations, and prioritization of natural infrastructure approaches.

Executive Order B-55-18 and SB 100 – 100 Percent Clean Energy Act of 2018: On September 10, 2018, Governor Brown signed both SB 100 – 100 Percent Clean Energy Act of 2018 and Executive Order B-55- 18 to Achieve Carbon Neutrality. SB 100 sets California on course to achieving carbon-free emissions from the electric power production sector by 2045. SB 100 also increases the required emissions reduction generated by retail sales to 60 percent by 2030, an increase of 10 percent compared to previous goals. B-55-18 establishes a new goal of achieving statewide “carbon neutrality as early as possible and no later than 2045, and to achieve and maintain net negative emissions thereafter” (Governor Brown, 2018).

California Building Code: The CBC contains standards regulating the method of use, properties, performance, or types of materials used in the construction, alteration, improvement, repair, or rehabilitation of a building or other improvement to real property. The CBC is adopted every three (3) years by the BSC. In the interim, the BSC also adopts annual updates to make necessary mid-term corrections. The CBC standards apply statewide. However, a local jurisdiction may amend a CBC standard if it makes a finding the amendment is reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.

Local
Monterey Bay Air Resources District: To date, MBARD has not adopted regulations or CEQA guidance for analysis of GHG effects of land use projects; nor has it prepared a qualified GHG reduction plan for use or reference by local agencies. MBARD recommends utilizing thresholds set by neighboring districts, such as the SMAQMD.

City of Soledad General Plan: There are no applicable policies or goals from the City’s General Plan. 230
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 77 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
2010 Monterey County General Plan: There are no policies or goals from the 2010 Monterey County General Plan that would be applicable to the Proposed Project.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
   
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
   
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
A GHG evaluation was completed for the Project as part of the air quality assessment by AMBIENT (August 2024). This report is contained in Appendix C. Implementation of the Project would contribute to increases in GHG emissions that are associated with global climate change. Short-term and long-term GHG emissions associated with the development of the Project are discussed in greater detail below.

Short-term Construction
Short-term construction emissions associated with the Project were quantified using the CalEEMod, version 2022.1.1.26. Emissions modeling included the analysis of proposed foundation/concrete, grading, pump station installation, asphalt paving, and trenching. Emissions were quantified based on projectspecific data provided, and default modeling parameters contained in the model for Monterey County.

Since equipment may not be used every day of the construction phase, phase durations in CalEEMod were based on the number of days of equipment use. CalEEMod offsite worker emissions were scaled based on the number of working days in the phase. Construction generated GHG emissions were amortized over an approximate 30-year project life and included with operational emissions estimates. Construction generated GHG emissions attributable to the Project are presented for informational purposes.

Short-term annual GHG emissions are summarized in Table 6. Based on the modeling conducted, emissions of GHGs associated with the construction of the Project would total approximately 396 MTCO2e.

There would also be a small amount of GHG emissions from waste generated during construction; however, this amount is speculative. Actual emissions would vary, depending on various factors including construction schedules, equipment required, and activities conducted. Assuming an average project life of 30 years, amortized construction-generated GHG emissions would total approximately 13 MTCO2e/yr.
231
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 78 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Table 6
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions
Construction GHG Emissions (MTCO2e)
Foundation/Concrete 5.73
Grading 62.15
Pump Station Installation 2.01
Asphalt Paving 70.03
Trenching 256.48
Total 396.39
Amortized Construction Emissions 13.21
Based on CalEEMod computer modeling. Amortized construction-generated GHG emissions assume a 30-year project life.

Long-term Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Long-term operational emissions of the Project were quantified using energy intensity factors for Monterey County from CalEEMod, version 2022.1.1.26. CalEEMod does not provide adjusted energy intensity factors to account for anticipated reductions in energy use in future years. Therefore, year 2027 energy intensity factors were conservatively used for turbine pump emission calculations. Two turbine water pumps would be in use during standard operation and the third used as a back-up. Based on information provided by the Project proponent, the water pumps would operate at 150 horsepower (hp) each. This is the equivalent of approximately 112 kW (kilowatts) per pump. Each of the two primary pumps were estimated to operate approximately 1,664 hours annually. Refer to Appendix A of Appendix C for turbine pump operation schedule, emissions modeling assumptions and results.

Estimated long-term increases in GHG emissions for future target years 2027 and year 2045 were calculated to ensure consistency with SB 32 and are depicted in Table 7. As depicted in this table, the annual operational GHG emissions associated with the Project would total approximately 35 MTCO2e/year.

With the inclusion of amortized construction emissions, operational GHG emissions would total approximately 48 MTCO2e/year.

Table 7
Annual Operational GHG Emissions – Unmitigated
Emissions Source GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/year)1
Turbine Water Pumps2 34.8
Total Project Operational Emissions 34.8
Amortized Construction Emissions 13.2
Total with Amortized Construction Emissions 48.0
1 Project-generated emissions were quantified using intensity factors from the CalEEMod computer program. 2 Includes operation of two electrified 150 hp (112 kW) turbine water pumps for an annual total of 3,328 hours.

As mentioned above quantified emissions are provided for informational purposes only. Project impacts relating to GHG emissions are discussed below and assessed by determining consistency with the State's 2022 Climate Scoping Plan and contributing its fair share of what would be required to meet the State’s long-term climate goals, including achieving carbon neutrality by 2045.

Consistency with Applicable Plans
Applicable GHG-reduction plans include the AMBAG 2022-245 MTP/SCS and ARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan. Project consistency with these plans is discussed in greater detail below. 232
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 79 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
AMBAG 2022-2045 MTP/SCS Consistency: To support the State’s GHG-reduction goals, including the goals mandated by SB 32, California established the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB 375). SB 375 requires regional metropolitan planning organizations, such as AMBAG, to develop SCSs that align transportation, housing, and land use decisions toward achieving the State’s GHG emissions-reduction targets. Under SB 375, the development and implementation of SCSs, which link transportation, land use, housing, and climate policy at the regional level, are designed to reduce per capita mobile-source GHG emissions, which is accomplished through the implementation of measures that would result in reductions in per capita VMT.

As previously noted, the AMBAG 2022-2045 MTP/SCS was developed in accordance with state and federal requirements including SB 375 which aims to reduce GHG emissions related to mobile sources.

Based on AMBAG guidelines, the Project would not have an impact on regional VMT. As a result, the Project would not conflict with any goals or objectives identified in the AMBAG 2022-2045 MTP/SCS.

Climate Change Scoping Plan: The previously adopted 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan incorporated the State’s GHG emissions reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 emissions levels by 2030, as mandated by SB 32. On November 16, 2022, the ARB approved the 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality. The recently adopted 2022 Scoping Plan continues the path to achieve the SB 32 2030 target and expands upon earlier Scoping Plans by targeting an 85 percent reduction in GHG below 1990 levels by 2045. A significant part of achieving the SB 32 goals are strategies to promote sustainable communities, such as the promotion of zero net energy buildings, and improved transportation choices that result in reducing VMT. Other measures include the increased use of low-carbon fuels and cleaner vehicles, as well as measures that promote the conservation of energy and water use.

California has begun to implement major policies to build resilience to combat the effects of climate change, including droughts. Such policies include the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014, the governor’s Water Resilience Portfolio (2020), the governor’s Water and Supply Strategy (August 2022), and new standards for indoor, outdoor, and industrial water use. In addition, Executive Order B-55-18 establishes a statewide goal to achieve carbon neutrality as soon as possible, and no later than 2045, and to achieve and maintain net negative emissions thereafter. As part of this effort, policies and programs undertaken to achieve this goal include the protection of the state’s water supply through, in part, the promotion of efforts to build a climate-resilient water infrastructure to insulate our communities from increasing and more intense drought conditions. The increased use of recycled water promotes a long-term reliable water supply sources and is an important water resource strategy for increasing drought resiliency in regions throughout California. Water recycling is also a critically important environmental and water use efficient strategy for the state. By effectively reusing water for potable and/or non-potable purposes, many areas of the state are able to reduce existing and future reliance on environmentally stressed imported water sources. The State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) recently updated California’s Recycled Water Policy and added new ambitious recycled water goals for the state (ARB 2022, WateReuse 2019).

Implementation of the Project would help to support the state’s energy and water-conservation efforts.

As a result, this impact would be less than significant. 233
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 80 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
b. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
As described above, the Proposed Project is not expected to generate GHG emissions that would exceed applicable thresholds. In addition, the Proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. This represents a less than significant impact.

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Environmental Setting
Hazardous materials, as defined by the California Code of Regulations, are substances with certain physical properties that could pose a substantial present or future hazard to human health or the environment when improperly handled, disposed, or otherwise managed. Hazardous waste is any hazardous material that is discarded, abandoned, or slated to be recycled. Hazardous materials and waste can result in public health hazards if improperly handled, released into the soil or groundwater, or through airborne releases in vapors, fumes, or dust. Soil and groundwater having concentrations of hazardous constituents higher than specific regulatory levels must be handled and disposed of as hazardous waste when excavated or pumped from an aquifer.

Government Code Section 65962.5 requires CalEPA to develop a Cortese List that is updated at least annually. While CalEPA no longer maintains a single Cortese List, CalEPA uses the following database and list to meet the requirements of Government Code Section 65962.5.  List of Hazardous Waste and Substances sites from Department of Toxic Substances Control (“DTSC”) EnviroStor database.
 List of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (“LUST”) Sites from the State Water Board’s GeoTracker database.
 List of solid waste disposal sites identified by State or Regional Water Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit.  List of “active” Cease and Desist Orders (“CDO”) and Clean-up and Abatement Orders (“CAO”) from State Water Board.
 List of hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health and Safety Code, identified by DTSC.

In addition to these databases, the State Water Board and the DTSC maintain databases of other hazardous material release sites with documented environmental contamination (GeoTracker, 2024 and EnviroStor, 2024). No hazardous materials release records are known to occur within the Proposed Project area based on a search of DTSC regulatory databases. There are seven closed LUST sites within the City of Soledad with four located near the intersection of Front Street and Soledad Street, one located near the intersection of Front Street and San Vicente Road, one located near the intersection of Front Street and 4th Street, and one located at Soledad Middle School (GeoTracker, 2024). 234
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 81 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Regulatory Environment
Federal
Environmental Protection Agency: The EPA is responsible for enforcing regulations at the federal level pertaining to hazardous materials and wastes. The primary federal hazardous materials and wastes laws are contained in the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) of 1976 and in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) of 1980.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act: CERCLA, more commonly known as Superfund, established the National Priorities List for identifying and obtaining funding for remediation of severely contaminated sites. Federal regulations pertaining to hazardous materials and wastes are contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR). The regulations contain specific guidelines for determining whether a waste is hazardous, based on either the source of generation or the characteristics of the waste.

U.S. Department of Transportation: The U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”) regulates transportation of hazardous materials by truck and rail. DOT regulations establish criteria for safe handling procedures. The California Administrative Code also includes federal safety standards.

Solid Waste Disposal Act/Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act: RCRA manages solid waste, landfills, and medical wastes. Under this act, solid wastes include hazardous materials. The act provides provisions for the generation, storage, treatment, and disposal of hazardous waste.

Toxic Substances Control Act: The Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”), passed in 1976, requires the EPA to report, test, place restriction on, and keep record of chemical substances and mixtures. The EPA has authority over the use, production, importation, and disposal of specific chemicals. Some chemicals include polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”), asbestos, radon, and lead paint.

State
California Environmental Protection Agency: The EPA has delegated much of its regulatory authority to individual states whenever adequate state regulatory programs exist. The Department of Toxic Substance Control Division of CAL EPA is the agency empowered to enforce federal hazardous materials and waste regulations in California, in conjunction with the EPA.

California hazardous materials and waste laws incorporate federal standards, but in many respects, are stricter. For example, the California Hazardous Waste Control Law, the state equivalent of RCRA, contains a much broader definition of hazardous materials and waste. The California Code of Regulations, Titles 22 and 26, contain state hazardous materials waste laws. Regulations implementing the California Hazardous Waste Control Law list hazardous chemicals; establish criteria for identifying, packaging, and labeling hazardous wastes; prescribe management of hazardous wastes; establish permit requirements for hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal, and transportation; and identify hazardous wastes that cannot be disposed of in landfills. 235
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 82 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Local
Regional Water Quality Control Board: The Central Coastal RWQCB is the lead agency responsible for identifying, monitoring, and remediating leaking underground storage tanks on the Central Coast. Local jurisdictions may take the lead agency role as a Local Oversight Program (“LOP”) entity, implementing State as well as local policies.

City of Soledad General Plan: The Public Service and Facilities Element of the City’s General Plan contains the following policies applicable to portions of the Proposed Project:

S-28: The City, to the extent feasible, will enforce the applicable provisions of the Monterey County Hazardous Waste Management Plan and all other applicable State, federal and local regulations dealing with the use, storage, disposal and transportation of hazardous materials.
2010 Monterey County General Plan: Relevant policies are listed below:

Policy PS-8.3: Programs for the routine inspection of food, water systems, sewage disposal, public housing, institutions, labor camps, swimming pools, recreation facilities, locations of hazardous substances, and noise hazards shall be established or maintained.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
   
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
   
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste in
one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
   
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
   
e) For a project located in an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, in two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
   
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
   
236
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 83 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
   
Impact Discussion
a and b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? The Proposed Project would entail the use of hazardous materials (e.g., fuel, cleaning materials, etc.) during construction. The types and amounts of hazardous materials used would vary according to the type of activity. In addition, use of hazardous materials may periodically be required during operation of the Proposed Project for on-going maintenance.

Construction
The Proposed Project would result in the handling and use of hazardous materials during construction activities. Hazardous materials may include gasoline, diesel fuel, oil lubricants, welding gases, solvents, and paints. It is unlikely that construction of the Proposed Project would create a significant impact due to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, as the Proposed Project would include implementation of runoff and erosion control measures, as well as standard construction BMPs to minimize potential impacts due to contaminated runoff. In addition, all hazardous materials would be stored, moved, and used in accordance with all local, state, and federal regulations pertaining to hazardous materials, as well as all applicable manufacturer’s specifications. To further ensure impacts related to hazardous materials are minimized, a Spill Prevention and Control Plan (“SPCP”) (see Mitigation Measure HAZ-1) would be developed prior to construction to address any accidental spills.

The SPCP would identify applicable safety and clean-up procedures in the event of a spill, designate construction staging areas where hazardous materials may be stored, identify applicable emergency notification procedures, identify locations where spill kits will be maintained during construction, and identify dedicated storage areas where material may be stored. This impact is less than significant with mitigation.

Operation
Operation of the Proposed Project would entail the use of hazardous materials for routine maintenance.

Hazardous materials would be handled and stored in compliance with all local, state, and federal regulations pertaining to hazardous materials. Furthermore, any hazardous materials would be limited in quantity and concentrations set forth by the manufacture and/or applicable regulations. While Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 focuses on construction related impacts, the SPCP would be implemented throughout operation. Risk of release or hazard due to the routine transport, use, or disposal would be minimized through implementation of the mitigation measures identified below. The City will be 237
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 84 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
responsible for implementing the SPCP on-site for the duration of construction and during operation.

With mitigation this represents a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the contractor shall prepare a Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Control Plan that addresses potential impacts associated with hazardous material usage during construction and operation. The plan shall, at a minimum, consist of the following:
 Identify applicable safety and clean-up procedures in the event of a spill.  Designate construction staging areas where hazardous materials may be stored. All staging areas shall be located outside of sensitive biological areas. Staging areas shall be designed to contain runoff to prevent contaminants (e.g., oil, grease, fuel products, etc.) from draining towards receiving waters and sensitive areas.
 Identify appropriate emergency notification procedures and emergency contacts (e.g., County of Monterey Environmental Health, City of Soledad Fire, etc.).  Designated location where a spill kit shall be maintained on-site throughout the Project.  Identify dedicated storage areas where hazardous material may be stored and/or used during operation.
c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste in one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? There are multiple schools located in a ¼ mile of the Proposed Project, including Rose Ferraro Elementary School (400 Entrada Dr., Soledad, CA 93960), Soledad High School (425 Gabilan Dr., Soledad, CA 93960), Jack Franscioni School (779 Orchard Ln., Soledad, CA 93960), Soledad Middle School (441 Main St., Soledad, CA 93960), and Frank Ledesma Elementary School (973 Vista De Soledad, Soledad, CA 93960). None of these schools are within a ¼ mile of the new recycled water pump station located at the existing WRF; however, construction of the distribution pipelines, requiring the use and transportation of hazardous materials (e.g., fuel, cleaning materials, etc.) would occur within a ¼ mile of the above listed schools. The Proposed Project’s pipeline components would not emit hazardous materials during operation; however, small quantities of hazardous materials could be used for system maintenance within a ¼ mile of one of the above listed schools. Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would help prevent inadvertent spills of hazardous materials and ensure that any release of hazardous materials during construction and operation of the Proposed Project would be promptly remedied and reported. This represents a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. d. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
As discussed above, CalEPA uses the DTSC EnviroStor and the State Water Board’s GeoTracker databases in conjunction with lists of solid waste disposal sites and active CDO and CAO from the State Water Board to identify hazardous materials sites across the state. No active hazardous materials sites are known to occur within the vicinity of the Proposed Project. There is one school investigation site at Jack Franscioni Elementary School and one military site on Serra Lane within the City; however, both sites require “no further action” (EnviroStor, 2024). Additionally, there are seven closed LUST sites within the City of Soledad with four located near the intersection of Front Street and Soledad Street, one located near the intersection of Front Street and San Vicente Road, one located near the intersection of Front Street and 4th Street, and one located at Soledad Middle School (GeoTracker, 2024). Since no active 238
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 85 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
hazardous materials sites exist within the vicinity of the Proposed Project (all are closed or require no further action), the Project would have a less than significant impact. e. For a project located in an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The airport closest to the Proposed Project area is Mesa Del Rey Airport, located approximately 17.5 miles southeast of the existing WRF. The Proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard or exposure to excessive noise for people residing or working in the Proposed Project area as there are no airports within two (2) miles of the site. No impact would occur. f. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The Monterey County 2021 Evacuation and Transportation Plan does not identify specific designated evacuation routes, since evacuation routes are considered dynamic and would change based on the nature and location of an emergency. As a result, all local roadways within the Proposed Project area could potentially be utilized as evacuation routes during an emergency. While the Proposed Project would result in short-term lane or road closures, all such closures would be conducted in accordance with a traffic control plan reviewed and approved by the City as part of the encroachment permit process. This would ensure that the proposed road or lane closures would not interfere with emergency response vehicles or area evacuation in an emergency. In addition, lane or road closures from the Proposed Project would be short-term and construction activities and equipment would not be located in a single location for long periods of time primarily due to the linear nature of installing the distribution pipelines. The Proposed Project would not generate additional traffic once operational.

Therefore, the Proposed Project would not impair implementation or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. This represents a less than significant impact.
g. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
The Proposed Project is not located in a state responsibility area or a local responsibility area classified as a very high fire hazard severity zone (County of Monterey, 2024). Construction activities would utilize mechanized equipment that has the potential to produce sparks. However, construction vehicles would be fitted with spark arrestors in compliance with all applicable state and local regulations, which would substantially reduce the risk of wildland fire as a result of construction. Once completed, the pipeline components of the Proposed Project would be largely underground and would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk. The new recycled water pump station would be located at the existing WRF site, a developed and disturbed site with low potential for wildfire. In addition, the Proposed Project does not include the construction of any new habitable structures. For these reasons, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact related to directly or indirectly exposing people or structures to wildland fire. 239
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 86 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Environmental Setting
The Project site is located in an alluvial plain in the Salinas Valley watershed. Precipitation drains downward into the valley from the slopes of the Santa Lucia Mountains to the north and west, and the Gabilan Mountains to the southeast. The primary drainage feature in the valley is the Salinas River. The river is approximately 170 miles in length and is the largest river on California’s Central Coast. The Salinas River flows northerly and drains into Monterey Bay (Bureau of Reclamation, 2017).

The City of Soledad draws its water supply from groundwater from the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin – Forebay Aquifer Subbasin, which is managed jointly by the Salinas Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency (“SVGSA”) and the Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency (“ASGSA”). ASGSA manages the Arroyo Seco Cone Management Area of the Forebay Aquifer and the SVGSA manages the remainder.

The Project lies within the portion of the Forebay Aquifer managed by SVGSA. The Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin consists of one large hydrologic unit comprised of four subareas: Upper Valley Subarea, Forebay Subarea, 180-Foot/400-Foot Subarea, and East Side Subarea. The subareas have different hydrogeologic and recharge characteristics, but barriers to horizontal flow do not separate them, and water can move between them. Therefore, extraction of water in the Soledad area for agricultural and urban use can affect overdraft and seawater intrusion conditions within the overall basin, including in the subareas nearest the Monterey Bay where seawater intrusion and overdraft are of significant concern. However, groundwater elevations have generally been stable, with decreases in groundwater levels in dry years and rebounding levels in wet years. Additionally, the 2023 water-year resulted in a substantial increase in groundwater levels throughout the basin (Montgomery & Associates, 2023).

Regulatory Environment
Federal
National Flood Insurance Program: FEMA established the National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”) to reduce flooding on private and public properties. The program provides subsidized flood insurance to communities that comply with FEMA regulations protecting development in floodplains. As part of the program, FEMA publishes Flood Insurance Rate Maps (“FIRM”) that identify Special Flood Hazard Areas (“SFHA”). An SFHA is an area that would be inundated by the one-percent annual chance flood, which is also referred to as the base flood or 100-year flood.

Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act: The Porter-Cologne Act delegates authority to the SWRCB to establish regional water quality control boards. The Central Coast Area RWQCB has authority to use planning, permitting, and enforcement to protect beneficial uses of water resources in the project region. Under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code Sections 13000 - 14290), the RWQCB is authorized to regulate the discharge of waste that could affect the quality of the state’s waters, including projects that do not require a federal permit through the USACE. To meet RWQCB 401 Certification standards, all hydrologic issues related to a project must be addressed, including the following:
 Wetlands
240
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 87 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
 Watershed hydrograph modification
 Proposed creek or riverine related modifications
 Long-term post-construction water quality
Any construction or demolition activity that results in land disturbance equal to or greater than one (1) acre must comply with the Construction General Permit (“CGP”), administered by the SWRCB. The CGP requires the installation and maintenance of BMPs to protect water quality until the site is stabilized.

The Proposed Project would disturb more than one acre of soil and is required to obtain coverage under the RWQCB National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) General Storm Water Permit.

State
Statewide Construction General Permit: The SWRCB has implemented a NPDES CGP for the State of California. For projects disturbing one acre or more, a Notice of Intent (“NOI”) and SWPPP must be prepared by a qualified professional prior to commencement of construction. The CGP includes requirements for training, inspection, record keeping, and for projects of certain risk levels, monitoring.

The general purpose of the requirements is to minimize the discharge of pollutants and to protect beneficial uses and receiving waters from the adverse effects of construction-related storm water discharges.

Local
Forebay Aquifer Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan: The 2014 California Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“SGMA”) requires that medium and high-priority groundwater basins and subbasins develop Groundwater Sustainability Plans (“GSP”) that outline how groundwater sustainability will be maintained for 50 years. The Forebay Aquifer Subbasin is designated as moderate priority by the SGMA. The Forebay Aquifer Subbasin GSP identifies potential management actions and projects that ensure the sustainable use of groundwater. Management actions and projects include but are not limited to establishing technical advisory committees, implementing best management practices for conservation and agriculture, and water quality coordination. The Forebay Aquifer Subbasin GSP establishes management criteria that specify minimum thresholds and measurable objectives to ensure sustainability goals are met and maintained.

The Project site is located almost entirely within Zone X (both Shaded and Unshaded), in accordance with FEMA. FEMA defines Zone X (shaded) as an area of moderate flood hazard (between the limits of the 100‐ year and 500‐year floods) and defines Zone X (Unshaded) as an area of minimal flood hazard (an area as having a 0.2 percent chance of annual flooding). Approximately 1,035 feet of pipeline, located in the eastern extent of the Project site at the corner of Metz Road and Orchard Lane is located within Zone AE. FEMA defines Zone AE as a special flood hazard zone with a one percent annual chance of flooding. The Project site does not contain any waterways or other drainage features. The nearest waterway to the Project site is a channelized agricultural ditch (Bryant Canyon Channel), located immediately east of the City and approximately 715 feet from the easternmost extent of the Project.

Additionally, the Salinas River is located approximately 1,050 feet south of the southernmost extent of the Project.

City of Soledad General Plan: The City’s Public Services and Facilities Element of the General Plan contains the following policies applicable to the Proposed Project:
241
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 88 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
S10: The City will manage the increase in water demand from new development to help ensure groundwater resources are not over drafted. The City will work with Monterey County and public and private water entities to plan for the efficient, long-term management of groundwater resources.

S14: The City shall strive to improve the quality of urban stormwater runoff and quality of groundwater recharge through the use of appropriate mitigation measures including, but not limited to, infiltration/sedimentation basins, oil/grit separators, and other management practices, including storm water retention.

S16: The City shall encourage project designs that minimize drainage concentrations and impervious coverage and maintain, to the extent feasible, natural site drainage conditions. Drainage onto adjacent properties shall be restricted to pre-project levels minus any runoff from the area to be developed.

S17: The City shall require projects to allocate land as necessary for the purpose of retaining flows and/or for the incorporation of mitigation measures for water quality and supply impacts related to urban runoff.

Monterey County General Plan Policies: The 2010 Monterey County General Plan includes policies related to hydrology and water quality that would apply to the Proposed Project:

Policy PS-2.8: The County shall require that all projects be designed to maintain or increase the site’s pre-development absorption of rainfall (minimize runoff), and to recharge groundwater where appropriate. Implementation shall include standards that could regulate impervious surfaces, vary by project type, land use, soils and area characteristics, and provide for water impoundments (retention/detention structures), protecting and planting vegetation, use of permeable paving materials, bioswales, water gardens, and cisterns, and other measures to increase runoff retention, protect water quality, and enhance groundwater recharge.

Policy S-3.1: Post-development, off-site peak flow drainage from the area being developed shall not be greater than pre-development peak flow drainage. On-site improvements or other methods for storm water detention shall be required to maintain post-development, off-site, peak flows at no greater than predevelopment levels, where appropriate, as determined by the Monterey County Water Resources Agency.

Policy S-3.2: Best Management Practices to protect groundwater and surface water quality shall be incorporated into all development.

Policy S-3.9: In order to minimize urban runoff affecting water quality, the County shall require all future development within urban and suburban areas to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) as approved in the Monterey Regional Storm Water Management Program which are designed to incorporate Low Impact Development techniques. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, grassy swales, rain gardens, bioretention cells, and tree box filters. BMPs should preserve as much native vegetation as feasible possible on the project site.
242
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 89 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade
surface or groundwater quality?
   
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
   
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site?    
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite?
   
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
   
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?    
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?    
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
   
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
The Proposed Project’s potential to result in violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during construction and operation is described below.

Construction
Construction of the Proposed Project would require grading and excavation that could result in temporary water quality impacts. Additional water quality impacts could come from the use of hazardous materials (e.g., diesel fuel, gasoline, lubricants, oils, hydraulic fluids, etc.). To minimize construction generated water quality impacts, the Proposed Project would implement standard construction BMPs (e.g., control/minimize grading, re-vegetate disturbed areas). Moreover, the Proposed Project would be required to comply with the requirements of the NPDES General Construction Permit to manage construction and post construction runoff. As part of this process, the Proposed Project would be required to submit an NOI with the SWRCB and prepare a SWPPP.

Construction of the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact with respect to 243
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 90 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
violating water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrading surface or groundwater quality.

Operation
The Proposed Project would utilize Title 22 treated recycled water to irrigate City parks and schools once operational. Title 22 recycled water consists primarily of municipal sewage treated in a wastewater facility for non-potable uses such as irrigation (SWRCB, 2024). The Proposed Project would transfer recycled water from the WRF to schools and parks throughout the City for irrigation. This recycled water would comply with all Title 22 requirements as defined in the Water Recycling Criteria, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations. Use of recycled water for irrigation would not conflict with State or local water quality standards. The Proposed Project would not generate substantial waste during operation. This represents a less than significant impact. b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
The Proposed Project is located in the Forebay Aquifer Subbasin of the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin, which is regulated by the SGMA. The Proposed Project consists of the expansion of a recycled water distribution system to allow irrigation of City parks and schools with recycled water. The Proposed Project would replace existing use of potable water sourced from groundwater for irrigation at 13 existing parks and six (6) schools throughout the City. In addition, irrigation at the future Toledo Park would also be supplied recycled water from the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project would reduce the City’s reliance on groundwater supply and would not interfere with groundwater recharge. No impact would occur.
c. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or-off site, ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or-off site, iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, or iv) impede or redirect flood flows? The Proposed Project is the expansion of a recycled water distribution system. The distribution system components of the Project would be located primarily within roadway ROWs which consist of paved areas. All paved areas disturbed by installation of the Proposed Project would be restored to their preproject condition following completion of construction and would not alter existing drainage patterns of the site or area. The transmission main component of the Project would be located within an existing agricultural easement. The area of disturbance for installation of this component would also be restored to pre-project condition following completion of construction and would not alter existing drainage patterns of the site or area. The recycled water pump station would be located at the existing WRF site where drainage is already managed. Construction of the recycled water pump station would not alter existing drainage patterns of the site or area. The Project would not result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or-off site, increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or-off site, or create runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned 244
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 91 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
stormwater drainage systems or impede or redirect flood flows. This represents a less than significant impact.
d. Would the project, in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
The Proposed Project is located in an inland area that is not subject to significant seiche or tsunami effects. As a result, the Proposed Project would not result in the risk or release of pollutants due to inundation from a tsunami or seiche.

According to FEMA, the Project site is located within Zone X (Shaded and Unshaded) and Zone AE (FEMA, 2024). The portions of the Project within Zone X (Unshaded) are considered to be of minimal flood hazard and, therefore, would not risk release of pollutants due to project inundation. The portions of the Project within Zone X (Shaded) and Zone AE have greater risk of flooding. Flooding in these areas during project construction could potentially result in the risk of pollutant release. However, compliance with the Project’s SWPPP (see impact a. above) would ensure that construction-based pollutants are not released during flood events. The Proposed Project would involve expansion of recycled water distribution across the City and would not present a significant risk release of pollutants due to project inundation once operational. This represents a less than significant impact. e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
The Proposed Project is located in the Forebay Aquifer of the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin; the Forebay Aquifer is not an adjudicated sub-basin and the portion of the Forebay Aquifer underlying the proposed project site is under the jurisdiction of the SVGSA. The Proposed Project involves expansion of a recycled water distribution system and does not represent an intensification of existing water use that would be incompatible with the Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Forebay Aquifer. The Proposed Project would reduce the City’s reliance on groundwater for irrigation of parks and schools. The recycled water used for irrigation would meet Title 22 requirements for treatment and use of this water would not conflict with any applicable water quality control plans. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact related to conflicting with or obstructing applicable water quality control plans or sustainable groundwater management plans.

4.11 Land Use and Planning
Environmental Setting
The Project is located in the City of Soledad and within an existing easement running through agricultural land in unincorporated Monterey County. The Soledad General Plan and the 2010 Monterey County General Plan regulate land use policies in the Proposed Project area.

Project components located within the City would be within City ROWs, on the WRF property, and within SUSD property. The Soledad General Plan designates the WRF and SUSD properties as “Public Facility.” Project components located within unincorporated Monterey County are designated in the County General Plan as “Farmlands 40-Acre Minimum.”
245
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 92 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Regulatory Environment
City of Soledad General Plan: The Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan defines the General Plan area and includes specific plans for the existing and planned development areas within the City. The City’s planning area includes the incorporated limits in addition to land outside the City boundaries that the City deemed to be related to planning objectives. The General Plan defines the planning area as “the ridgeline of the Gabilan Range to the east and the foothills of the coast range to the west, extending north past the Soledad prison, and to the south about mid-way between Soledad and Greenfield” (City, 2005a). Table 8 below summarizes the General Plan definitions of land use designations:

Table 8
Land Use Designations
Land Use Designations Land Use Descriptions
Single Family Residential
This land use designation allows for single family
residential development with up to six dwellings per acre and allows a range of other uses that includes schools, churches, and public facilities.

Duplex Residential
This designation allows for the construction of duplexes (two attached units on the same lot) and attached
housing clusters.

Multiple Residential
The Multiple Residential designation allows for
development of multi-family housing such as apartments, condominiums, and townhouses.

General Commercial
The General Commercial designation support uses of a
community retail nature such as appliance stores, food
stores, offices, banks, and other uses for the community as a whole.

Neighborhood Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial land uses proved goods and
services for a specific neighborhood, such as convenience stores, food stores, drug stores, etc.

Downtown Commercial
A mix of retail, office, and other service uses appropriate for the Central Business District, also potentially including some residential uses on upper floors.

Service Commercial
Uses such as wholesale and retail stores and shops of a heavy commercial and business park character conducted
inside or outside a building, such as auto repair shops, from equipment repair and sales, etc.

Industrial
Manufacturing, processing, repair, storage, and/or
agricultural related industries in a conventional industrial or business park setting.

Public/Institutional Schools, government buildings, libraries, churches, hospitals, etc.

Recreational Open space lands that provide active recreation areas with maintained landscaping facilities.

Open Space/Grazing Land
Undisturbed open space uses that maintain scenic and
natural habitat values as well as flood zone safety and safety from other hazards. Grazing land is generally
located on hillsides above the 400-foot contour elevation.

Agriculture Agriculture lands intended for soil-dependent uses.

Source: City, 2005a.
246
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 93 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Front Street Improvement Plan and Downtown Specific Plan: The Front Street Improvement Plan and Downtown Specific Plan seeks to achieve goals related to improving business and attracting tourism.

The plan provides a framework for the revitalization of downtown Soledad as the social and business center of the community. This plan encourages amenities such as street trees, benches, open plazas, and walkways that provide protection from the heat and wind (City, 2005a). The Proposed Project would install water distribution pipelines within this specific plan area. All infrastructure would be underground and would not conflict with the goals and policies defined by the Front Street Improvement Plan and Downtown Specific Plan.

Monterey County General Plan: The Proposed Project would occur partially on farmland in unincorporated Monterey County. The following land use policies from the Monterey County General Plan relevant to the Proposed Project are identified below:

LU-3.1: The County shall establish regulations for and designate three categories of Agricultural Land:
a. Farmlands (F): Farmlands are typically 40-acre minimum sites and allow a range of uses to conserve and enhance the use of the important farmlands in the County of Monterey while also providing opportunity to establish necessary support and ancillary facilities for those agricultural uses. The extent of use of land for this designation shall be limited to building coverage of 5% of the subject property, except for commercial greenhouse operations, which are permitted coverage of 50%.
b. Permanent Grazing (PG): Permanent Grazing lands are typically 40-to-160-acre minimums and allow a range of land uses to conserve and enhance the productive grazing lands in the County. The extent of use of land for this designation shall be limited to building coverage of 5% of the subject property, except for commercial greenhouse operations, which are permitted coverage of 50%. c. Rural Grazing (RG): Rural Grazing lands are typically a range of 10-to-40-acre minimums and allow uses to conserve and enhance the use of productive grazing lands in the County of Monterey while also providing the opportunity to establish support facilities for grazing uses and clustered residential uses. The extent of use of land for this designation shall be limited to building coverage of 5% of the subject property, except for commercial greenhouse operations, which are permitted coverage of 50%.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Physically divide an established community?    
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
   
247
Soledad Recycled Water Conveyance Project 94 Draft ISMND City of Soledad January 2025
Impact Discussion
a. Would the project physically divide an established community? The division or disruption of an established community would occur if a project created a physical barrier that separates, isolates, or divides portions of a built community. The physical division of a community is traditionally associated with large projects such as the construction of large-scale transportation improvements such as a highway, the creation of large university campuses, or new stadiums with parking areas. The Proposed Project consists of construction and operation of a recycled water pump station located at the WRF and installation of a transmission pipeline and distribution pipelines within part of unincorporated Monterey County and roadway ROWs within the City limits. The Project would install all pipeline components underground and would not physically divide an established community. Since the Proposed Project would not create a barrier that would divide an established community, no impact would occur.
b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The Proposed Project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect. Construction would occur at the WRF, an easement within farmland in unincorporated Monterey County, and roadway ROWs within the City limits. Construction and operation of the recycled water pump station is consistent with activities at the WRF. Construction of the transmission pipeline through agricultural County land would not conflict with County agricultural land use policies as pipeline installation would not convert existing farmland to non-agricultural uses nor would the easement occur on land currently supporting agricultural work. Construction of the distribution pipelines within the City roadway ROWs would partially occur within the planning area of the Front Street Improvement Plan and Downtown Specific Plan. However, construction and operation of the Proposed Project would not conflict with policies, goals, and objectives from both the General Plan and the Front Street Improvement Plan and Downtown Specific Plan adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, since proposed facilities would be located underground. For these reasons, the Project would have a less than significant impact.

← All documents from this meeting