Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.
Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.
Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.
from (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/01/2017 To (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/31/2021 Crash Data Period (years) " 5 Fill out the crash data table(s) for the crash type(s) as required by the selected countermeasure(s)in Step 2.
Based on the countermeasuresselected in Step 2 , the crash data types to be provided are:
Crash Data Table for Crash Type: Pedestrians and Bicyclists Involved (P&B) No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(P&:B)
Severe Injury
(P&:B)
Other Visible
Injury (P&:B)
Complaint
of Pain
(P&:B)
PDO
(P&:B) Total ID
1 SI_l: 9 signalized intersections 0 2 s 9 1 17
2 SI_2:12 signalized intersection 0 1 8 12 2 23
Total 0 3 13 21 3 40
Crash Data Table for Crash Type: ALL
No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(ALL)
Severe
Injury (ALL)
Other Visible
Injury (ALL)
Complaint
of Pain
(ALL)
PDO
(ALL) Total §ID
1 SI_l: 9 signalized intersections 1 s 12 69 107 194
2 SI_2:12 signalized intersection 2 3 19 77 127 228
Total 3 8 31 146 234 422
Version Date HSIP Analyzer :April 2022
Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.
Benefit Summary:
Benefit by Locations
location No : Description [CMl] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit SI_l: 9 signalized intersections $4,101,440 $0 $5,623,020 $9,724,460 S1_2:12 signalized intersection $4,172,940 $3,644,979 $3,723,790 $11,541,709 Sum $8,274,380 $3,644,979 $9,346,810 $21,266,169
Benefit by Countermeasures
No.
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Countermeasure Benefit
S09: Install raised pavement markers and striping (through intersection) $8,274,380
S21PB: Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) $9,346,810
S1SPB:Install pedestrian crossing (S.1.) $3,644,979
NA $0
NA $0
NA $0
NA $0
NA $0
NA $0
TOTAL $21,266,169
Click to Perform Benefit Calculation
Version Date HSIP Analyzer :April 2022
Section IV. Construction Cost Estimate and Cost Breakdown The purpose of this section is to:
o Provide a detailed engineer's estimate for construction items. The costsfor other phases i.e. Preliminary Engineering (PE), Right of Way (ROW), and Construction Engineering (CE) will be accounted for in the next section. o Determine the project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR).
IV.I Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:
Cost breakdown:
For each item, enter cost percentages for this project's safety countermeasures (CMs) and "Other Safety (OS)"respectively ( e.g. enter 10 for 10%). The percentage for "Non-safety (NS)" is then calculated. If an item is a general one (such as traffic control, mobilization, etc.), check the "General item" box and the cost breakdown is not needed. A general item will NOT be used in determining the project's overall percentages of countermeasures, other safety and non-safety costs.
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
forCMs
%for
OS
%for
NS
Raised pavement markers EA 24 $5000.00 120,000 100 % 0 % 0 % Implement Leading Pedestrian
Interval EA 24 $3000.00 72,000 100 % 0 % 0 %
Crosswalks Peri 15 $16000.00 240,000 100 % 0 % 0 %
Mobi Iization LS $21600.00 21,600 X 0 % 0 % 0 %
Weighted Average(%)
Total($) $453,600
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total"of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%)
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds)
IV.2 Funding Reimbursement Ratio
Project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio = 90.0%
The project'sMaximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio is calculated from the leastof the FEs of the project's countermeasures and reduced if the non-safety cost percentage is in excess of 10%.See the HSIP Analyzer Manual for details. This is the maximum value allowed to be entered in "HSIP!Total(%)"column in Section II(Project Cost Estimate).
20 % $90,720
$544,400
Version Date HSIP Analyzer :April 2022
Section V. Project Cost Estimate
All project costs, for all phases and by all funding sources, must be accounted for on thisform. i. 'Total Cost":Round all costs up to the nearest hundred dollars. ii. "HSIP/Total (%)": The maximum allowed is the project's Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR) as determined in Section I. Click the button to assign the maximum to all, OR enter if not the maximum. iii. "HSIP Funds"and "Local/Other Funds"are calculated.
Pay attention to the interactive warning/error messages below the table.The messages, if any, must be fixed, or exceptions should be justified in narrative question No. 3 in the HSIP Application Form.
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":
Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $0 90 % $0 $0
PS&::E $81,700 90 % $73,530 $8,170
Subtotal - PE $81,700 90 % $73,530 $8,170
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 90 % $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions&::
Utilities $0 90 % $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $81,700 90 % $73,530 $8,170 Construction Items $544,400
(Read only• from Section I)
90 % $489,960 $54,440
Subtotal - Construction $626,100 90 % $563,490 $62,610
PROJECT TOTAL $707,800 90 % $637,020 $70,780
D Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE• HSIP funds is $0).
Interactive Warning/Error Messages:
If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.
90 %
Version Date:April HSIP Analyzer 2022
_Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost", "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.
Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)
$707,800 $637,020 90%
21,266,169 30.05
Project Location Map
City of South El Monte
ATTACHMENT B
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 7.d.
DATE: March 12, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: John Poehler, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR SANITARY SEWER
CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CCTV) AND CONDITION
ASSESSMENT
SUMMARY: Staff seeks City Council approval to issue Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide Sanitary Sewer Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) and Condition Assessment.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council approve the RFP to solicit proposals from qualified firms to provide Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment.
FISCAL/FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed services will be funded through Sewer Assessment Funds.Staff will return to City Council to award contract after proposals are received and establish a budget for the requested services.
DISCUSSION: The City of South El Monte is requesting proposals from qualified, interested firms to provide professional services for the Sanitary Sewer Closed-Circuit Television and Condition Assessment Services for approximately 231,504 linear feet or
43.8 miles of sewer pipes, generally 8” diameter Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP), pipe size range from 6” to 15” in diameter within the City limits. This RFP describes the project, the required scope of services, the minimum information that must be included in the proposal, and the selection process.
Consultant shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to perform the condition assessment. The purpose of the condition assessment program is to assess the structural condition, hydraulic condition and/or sedimentation level of all pipelines for inclusion in future rehabilitation projects. The overall condition of the system of pipes and manholes videoed will be determined and structural deficiencies will be identified for each pipe reach and associated manholes. Based on the assessment, the consultant shall provide Rehabilitation recommendations for each defected sewer segment/manhole such as; but not limited to, Point Repair (location and length), Cast in Place Pipe CIPP Lining, Pipe Replacement (Location and length), Manhole Replacement. These recommendations shall be only for the Sewer Main Line and NOT to the sewer laterals.
Staff seeks City Council approval to issue Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment.
Staff report was collaboratively prepared by Andrés González, Senior Public Works Analyst and the staff from TransTech.
ATTACHMENT(S):
A. RFP for Sanitary Sewer CCTV (002)(967571.1)
B. Exhibit, System Inventory Map
ATTACHMENT A
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
FOR SANITARY SEWER CCTV AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT
IN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA
March 13, 2024
CONTACT INFORMATION FOR INQUIRIES
contact via e-mail only, no telephone calls
John Poehler
Director of Public Works
[email protected]
DELIVERY ADDRESS
City of South El Monte
1415 Santa Anita Ave.
South El Monte, CA 91733
Attn: City Clerk’s Office
REQUIRED NUMBER OF PROPOSALS
One (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic
copy (pdf)
PROPOSAL DUE DATE
April 10, 2024; 2:00 PM
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. General Information 1
2. Project Description 1
3. RFP Schedule 2
4. Scope of Services 2
5. Key Personnel 11
6. City’s Standard Professional Services Agreement 12
7. Insurance Coverage Limits and Requirements 12
8. Consultant Selection Methodology 12
9. Prevailing Wage Rates 13
10. Contract Award 14
11. Required Format for Technical Proposal Submittal 14
12. Fee Estimate Proposal Submittal 15
13. Questions Regarding This RFP 15
14. Proposal Submittal Protocol 16
15. Pre-Contractual Expenses In Responding To The RFP Preparation 16 Attachments:
Attachment A - Affidavit of Non-Collusion
Attachment B - Claims History
Attachment C - California Levine Act Statement
Attachment D - Sample Professional Services Agreement
Attachment E – System Inventory Map
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment Cover Page
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
FOR SANITARY SEWER CCTV AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT
IN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA
To interested and qualified Consultants:
The City of South El Monte is soliciting Proposals from qualified firms to provide Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment Services.
Requirements for this RFP are enclosed.
In order to be considered in the selection process, interested parties shall submit one (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic copy (pdf) of their Proposals no later than 2:00 PM, April 10, 2024, to:
City of South El Monte
1415 Santa Anita Ave.
South El Monte, CA 91733
Attn: City Clerk’s Office
If you have any questions, please contact via email (no telephone calls):
John Poehler
Director of Public Works
[email protected]
Late proposals will not be accepted.
Sincerely,
John Poehler
Director of Public Works
City of South El Monte
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 1
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
FOR SANITARY SEWER CCTV AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT
IN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA
March 13, 2024
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Community Profile
Incorporated in 1958, the City of South El Monte is an industrial community of approximately 21,000 residents and encompasses 2.3 square miles. This “Industrial Community” is located approximately 13 miles east of downtown Los Angeles and is adjacent to two major freeways and a major State Route in the San Gabriel Valley.
South El Monte offers a good blend of older and younger residents working in the same dedication and community spirit that the city was founded upon. Both the residents and business community are working together to make the community a better place to live and work.
In just six decades the City of South El Monte has matured into a viable commercial and industrial base, with over 2,400 businesses within 2.3 square miles. The City is currently focusing on improving the infrastructure of the community making it a better place to live and work.
B. Overview
The City is requesting the services of a company to provide Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment Services.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of South El Monte is requesting proposals from qualified, interested firms to provide professional services for the Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment Services for approximately 231,504 linear feet or 43.8 miles of sewer pipes, generally 8” diameter Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP), pipe size range from 6” to 15” in diameter within the City limits. This RFP describes the project, the required scope of services, the minimum information that must be included in the proposal, and the selection process.
Consultant shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to perform the condition assessment. The purpose of the condition assessment program is to assess the structural condition, hydraulic condition and/or sedimentation level of all RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 2 pipelines for inclusion in future rehabilitation projects. The overall condition of the system of pipes and manholes videoed will be determined and structural deficiencies will be identified for each pipe reach and associated manholes. Based on the assessment, the consultant shall provide Rehabilitation recommendations for each defected sewer segment/manhole such as; but not limited to, Point Repair (location and length), Cast in Place Pipe CIPP Lining, Pipe Replacement (Location and length), Manhole Replacement.
These recommendations shall be only for the Sewer Main Line and NOT to the sewer laterals.
3. RFP SCHEDULE
Below is the RFP schedule. Below tentative schedule is subject to change by the City:
Request for Proposals Posted and Issued Wednesday, March 13, 2024 Deadline for Receipt of Questions Thursday, March 28, 2024, 5:00 PM Addendum (if necessary) to Respond to
Questions
Wednesday, April 3, 2024
Deadline for Receipt of Proposals (RFP Due
Date)
Wednesday, April 10, 2024, 2:00 PM
Evaluation of proposals April/May 2024
Final Consultant Selection May 2024
Contract Awarded by City Council May/June 2024
Contract Execution June 2024
Notice to Proceed June 2024
4. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following is a general outline of the scope of work to be provided by the Consultant.
While it is believed that this scope includes all elements essential to complete the project, proposing firms are advised to include any items that they believe may be necessary to complete the project. Proposing firms may also note any required items that they believe may be excessive or unnecessary. The cost of such items should be separately noted in their proposals. Services required shall include:
CCTV Inspection
Consultant shall make a video recording of the television inspection and supply one copy to the City. The video recordings shall be in color and give clear video/pictures of conditions of pipelines with hydraulic and structural problems. The recording(s) deemed unacceptable by the City shall be reproduced at no cost to the City.
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 3 All data and video recording will become the sole property of the City without restrictions of future use, duplication, modification, and dissemination. Consultant shall have no vested rights to the completed work and may not sell or reuse it without the City’s permission. The project data furnished to the Consultant for use in rendering project services shall remain the property of the City and shall be returned on termination of the agreement. Consultant may not distribute, sell, or otherwise use data without permission of the City.
Consultant shall create pipeline reports, containing the measurement of faults and other features inside the pipeline. This includes measurements of pipe size, number and location of laterals, water levels and other features, as well as automatic analysis of pipe ovality and pipe available capacity up to 30 times per second.
The camera shall be moved through the line in either direction at a uniform rate stopping when necessary to ensure proper documentation of the sewer’s condition but in no case shall the television camera be pulled at a speed greater than thirty feet per minute (30 fpm).
As the camera approaches a lateral connection, or substantial structural defect, the camera progress shall be halted and the camera lens panned to further view the lateral pipe and connection (including looking up the lateral) or defect to thoroughly evaluate its condition.
Manual winches, power winches, TV cable powered rewind, or other devices that do not obstruct the camera view or interfere with proper documentation of the sewer conditions shall be used to move the camera through the line. If, during the inspection operation, the television camera fails to pass through the entire manhole section, Consultant shall reset his equipment in a manner so that the inspection can be performed from the opposite manhole. If again, the camera fails to pass through the entire section, Consultant shall notify the City’s project manager immediately.
If, during the television inspection, Consultant encounters a condition where public safety is threatened (such as, but not limited to, a pipe hole, pipe collapse, stoppage, blockage and/or eminent sewer spill) City Project Manager shall be notified immediately.
Furthermore, Consultant shall provide a videotape copy of the section of line containing the condition within 24 hours to City’s project manager.
If, during the television Inspection, the camera is jammed inside the sewer and cannot be retrieved, Consultant shall not excavate the pipe to retrieve it. Consultant shall inform the City immediately for assistance, but it is Consultant’s responsibility to remove the camera and ensure that the sewer is not damaged.
Whenever non-remote powered and controlled winches are used to pull the television camera through the line, telephone, radios or other suitable means of communication shall be set up between the two manholes of the section being inspected to ensure that adequate communications exists between members of the crew.
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 4 Operators
All closed-circuit television (CCTV) operators shall be certified by the National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) by passing the Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (PACP). The methodology of evaluation, data collection, and reporting criteria used for the NASSCO certification shall be practiced for all CCTV inspections. No work under this Contract shall be performed by non-NASSCO certified operators. Consultant shall include copies of its CCTV operators’ NASSCO certifications in the proposal package.
Pre-Inspection Cleaning
All sewer pipelines to be inspected shall be sufficiently cleaned by the Consultant within 72 hours prior to CCTV inspection to provide clear examination of the pipe’s interior and to provide sufficient opening for the camera to pass through the pipe. The Consultant shall be careful not to damage any pipes, including existing plastic lining.
Cleaning methods shall be employed to sufficiently clean the pipe so the camera can pass and fully ascertain and document the structural integrity and operational condition of the pipe. Any costs associated with CCTV work that is necessitated by the Consultant’s failure to sufficiently clean the main line shall be borne by the Consultant.
All sludge, dirt, sand, rocks, grease, roots, and other solid or semisolid material resulting from the cleaning operations shall be removed and hauled away from the downstream manhole of the section being cleaned. Passing material from sewer section to sewer section shall not be permitted. The Consultant shall be responsible for removing all solid and semisolid materials from the cleaning operation from the work site no less often than at the end of each workday. Materials, which accumulate during the workday, shall be placed in totally enclosed and watertight containers. Handling, transport, and disposal of materials shall be in full compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local requirements, and is the sole responsibility of the Consultant.
The Consultant shall verify the manhole locations and information provided by the City’s Project Manager prior to the CCTV inspections. The Consultant shall notify Project Manager of any discrepancies within 24 hours of discovering discrepancies.
CCTV Equipment
The Consultant’s CCTV equipment shall include video cameras, a video monitor cable, power sources, and all equipment necessary to perform a CCTV inspection as outlined in this RFP.
The cameras shall meet Cal-OSHA requirements for operating in a sanitary sewer environment.
The cameras shall have Pan-and-Tilt capabilities, and shall have a minimum of 360 x 270 RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 5 degree rotation and illumination sensitivity shall be three lux or less and provide a minimum of 460 lines of resolution. The focal distance shall be adjustable through a range from 25 mm (1 inch) to infinity.
During CCTV inspection, lighting intensity shall be adjusted to minimize glare. Lighting and picture quality shall be adjusted to provide a clear, in-focus picture of the entire periphery of the pipeline for all conditions encountered.
All camera systems shall be able to navigate around minor objects, roots, and debris. The system used to move the camera through the pipe shall not obstruct the camera’s view or interfere with proper documentation of the sewer conditions.
The camera cable shall be retracted to remove slack and to ensure an accurate footage reading.
The distance shall be measured between the exit of the start manhole and the entrance of the finish manhole for a true measurement of the length of the pipe segment, as required by PACP. It shall be recorded in standard units and the video display readout shall display units to one-tenth of a foot.
The cable footage-counter shall be accurate to plus or minus 2 feet per 1,000 feet. The Consultant shall calibrate their measuring device monthly with a known distance prior to starting the inspection and recording process.
Video inspection and reporting shall be submitted in a NASSCO-compatible format.
The camera lens shall be kept clear of condensation and debris during the CCTV inspection.
Consultant shall have the ability to communicate with its crew at all times (i.e.. cellular phone, radio, etc.).
Consultant shall have replacement equipment available within twenty-four (24) hours in the event of equipment breakdown.
Software Requirements
The Consultant shall perform all CCTV inspections using the Granite Net version 4.8 software, by Cues, in the PACP module. It is intended that the Consultant shall make a continuous digital recording of the complete pipe inspection. The recording shall also be used as a permanent record of defects. Unless directed otherwise by the City, the recording shall be MPEG 4. The Consultant shall pause the digital recording at any time there is a delay in the inspection and restart the digital video recording in the same digital file. The pause shall in no way affect, freeze, or interrupt the reply of the video and shall not close the video file during the inspection. The Consultant shall store a single video file for each segment inspected. The recorded files shall have a resolution of 352 by 240 RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 6 pixels and an interlaced frame rate of a minimum of 24 frames per second. The naming of the video file shall be automatic, consisting of “UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AND MANHOLE ID”, as shown in the following example.
All pictures shall be recorded as a JPEG image. For each picture, indexing shall exist as a separate text file of the observation noted. The data shall be time coded using the elapsed time from the video file. This shall allow the user in Granite Net version 4.8 to use the indexing feature and go to that defect with a click instead of fast forwarding or rewinding. All pictures shall have the same file name as the pipeline video plus the footage where the picture is taken.
Separate video and data files shall be created for each sewer line segment. In case of reverse setup, such inspection shall be stored in a separate video and data files. If an undocumented manhole is discovered during the inspection, then a separate inspection shall be started for the additional pipe segment. At the kick-off meeting, the City will provide the Consultant with a list of unused manhole IDs for naming the undocumented manholes.
Video
The Consultant shall make a continuous color digital recording in MPEG 4 format for each pipe segment inspected, unless specified by City.
Video files shall have a minimum resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and an interlaced frame rate at a minimum of 24 frames per second.
Video inspection will not exceed a traverse rate of 30 feet per minute.
The Consultant shall pause the digital recording at any time there is a delay in the inspection and restart the digital video recording in the same digital file. The pause shall in no way affect, freeze, or interrupt the replay of the video and shall not close the video file during the inspection.
Each pipe segment (manhole to manhole) shall be identified with an initial text screen and completed in accordance with PACP’s CCTV inspection form header Instructions and shall be as follows:
Line Number & Description
Line 1: Surveyed By
Line 2: Street
Line 3: Location Code*
Line 4: Weather*
Line 5: Direction of Survey (upstream/downstream)
Line 6: Use of Sewer*
Line 7: Pipe Material
Line 8: Pipe Diameter/Height
Line 9: Pipe Length (on plans)
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 7 Line 10: Start Manhole City ID Number
Line 11: End Manhole City ID Number
Line 12: Pipe ID
Line 13: District Number
Line 14: Inspection Time/Date
Line items noted with an asterisk (*) are optional depending on the line capacity of the text overlay equipment.
This data must completely match the data entered in the database header information.
The Consultant shall provide a sample submittal of the CCTV video output, inspection log, digital photos, and inspection evaluation database, after completing 1 day of CCTV inspection. City staff shall determine the typical video quality, quality of cleaning of the pipe, and judgment exercised on the evaluation of pipe condition. This submittal shall note any changes to the Specifications listed in this RFP regarding video format, compression or other conditions for review and approval by the City.
The initial text screen shall appear no more than 15 seconds at the beginning of the video footage, and shall appear before the 360-degree pan of the starting manhole.
During the CCTV inspection, the video shall show the following text at all times:
Line Number Description
Line 1: City
Line 2: Street/ Start Manhole City ID Number/ Direction of Inspection/End Manhole City ID Number
Line 3: Pipe Material/ Pipe Size
Line 4: Inspection Time/Date/Running Total
Line 5: District Number
During the CCTV inspection, the camera shall stop at all defects and significant observations to ensure a clear and focused view of the pipe condition and shall rotate the camera head at the defect to allow for adequate evaluation.
The video recording shall include on-screen observation text for every observation recorded in the database, including Access Man Hole AMH, in addition to the text in Section J above.
The naming of the video file shall be automatic, consisting of “UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CITY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AND MANHOLE CITY ID” Photographs
Digital photographs in JPEG format shall be made of all recorded defect observations.
These photographs will be computer generated with the use of the inspection reporting system software.
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 8 JPEG images shall be captured at a minimum resolution of 800X600 pixels.
At a minimum, all photographs shall be named consisting of the following descriptions:
“FROM MANHOLE CITY ID NUMBER”, “TO MANHOLE CITY ID NUMBER”, the defect location along the pipe. It is in the Consultant’s discretion as to additional data information that may be needed in the naming of the files to make each file unique within the file naming constraints of their inspection software.
Any additional information shall be included after the mandatory information specified above. The naming convention shall be consistent throughout the project.
A minimum of ONE photograph of each defect shall be taken.
ONE photograph is required for each lateral connection looking directly at the connection and each AMH observation from the bottom of the manhole looking up.
Additional Inspection Procedures
A full 360-degree pan of all manholes is required. This video footage shall occur at the beginning of each pipe segment survey inspection from the bottom of the manhole panning up the manhole shaft. The Consultant shall cover the manhole opening to prevent too much light from entering the structure and to ensure a clear and focused view of the manhole interior. In instances when the manhole is the terminating manhole, then the pan shall occur at the end of the pipe segment survey inspection.
Video footage shall be taken centered on the pipe with the water level running horizontally. The camera shall run along the invert of the pipe and not at its side, unless it is passing a point obstacle. If extended driving on the side of the pipe is required, then either the pipe needs a more thorough cleaning or an observation should be noted from the PACP codes describing the nature of the obstacle.
Obstructions may be encountered during the course of the CCTV inspection that prevent the travel of the camera. In instances when obstructions are not passable, the Consultant shall withdraw the equipment and begin a CCTV inspection from the opposite end of the sewer reach.
If a particular line is inspected more than once, then the Consultant shall include all versions of the inspections in the database. The MGO observation shall be used on all inspections except at the first occurrence. The Consultant shall provide an explanation for the additional inspections in the Remarks section.
Excessive Depth of Flow
Maximum depth of flow for CCTV inspections shall be 30 percent of the pipe diameter. If the depth of flow is greater, then the CCTV inspection shall be performed during the low RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 9 flow periods between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
The Consultant shall pay special attention to all local jurisdiction rules and regulations, especially regarding activities during off-peak hours. If the flow is still above 25 percent on the return trip, then the Consultant can use a flow-controlling mechanism (i.e. flow reducer) to control the flow and proceed with the inspection. After the initial screen and AMH observation, the MGO observation shall be used to note the reason for the return to this location and indicate the use of such flow-controlling equipment, in the appropriate box in the section header information screen.
The Consultant shall include the original inspection in the final submittal even with high flow conditions.
If the Consultant encounters a surcharging manhole (whereas the flow at the manhole is at least 50 percent of the sewer pipe diameter), then the Consultant shall immediately notify the Public Works Maintenance Services Section.
Measurement and Payment
Measurement and payment for CCTV and condition assessment and recommendations of existing sanitary sewer pipelines and manholes shall be at the unit price per linear foot, regardless of diameter. CCTV Inspections for approximately 231,504 linear feet of sanitary sewer pipes.
Payment shall be made at the unit price per linear foot, regardless of pipeline diameter, indicated in the Proposal for which price shall constitute full compensation for furnishing all materials, labor, traffic control set up (heavy and light traffic areas), tools and equipment for the cleaning and video inspection/taping and condition assessment of the existing sanitary sewer pipelines and manholes identified.
In general, the actual length of video inspection should be used for invoicing purposes.
The actual length is the distance that the Consultant was able to video inspect in lineal feet from the inside face of the upstream wall of the downstream manhole, where the CCTV equipment was placed into the pipe, to the farthest point along the pipe segment that cleaning was conducted with a maximum length being up to the inside face of the upstream wall of the upstream manhole.
If a clean pipe is only able to be partially inspected due to an obstruction, the Consultant shall immediately alert the City’s Project Manager.
If the obstruction is found to be a physical defect which did not allow the video inspection to take place, then the Consultant may invoice for the amount actually videotaped by the Consultant.
For pipes that are able to be videotaped in their entirety, the invoiced length will be compared to the GIS length to identify inconsistencies. Also, City’s Public Works RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 10 Inspector and Project Manager will be inspecting work sites and measurement techniques during this project.
A. Project Submittals and Deliverables
1. Submittals
The project submittal will consist of:
A. An external hard drive (provided by the Consultant at Consultant’s expense) containing the database, video, and photo files.
B. A printed Report in a hardcover white clear view 3-ring binder labeled as described in the “Deliverables Section” below containing the following information:
a. Footage calibration report for each camera used.
b. PACP Certificate copies of all operators.
c. Summary table of all pipeline segments inspected within each district with the following fields in the order listed:
Column 1: Date of Inspection
Column 2: Start Manhole City ID
Column 3: Stop Manhole City ID
Column 4: Total Pipe Length (per attached plan)
Column 5: Televised Length
Column 6: Quick Maintenance Rating (per PACP)
Column 7: Quick Structure Rating (per PACP)
Column 8: Section Number (*NOTE: The table shall be sorted by Start Manhole)
d. An observation table of all pipeline segments inspected with the following fields in the order listed:
Column 1: Section Number
Column 2: Position of Defect
Column 3: Observation Code (per PACP)
Column 4: Observation Description (per PACP)
Column 5: Structural Grade (per PACP)
Column 6: O&M Grade (per PACP)
Column 7: Recommendations (e.g. Point Repair, CIPP Lining, etc.) (*NOTE: The table shall be sorted by Section Number)
2. Deliverables
A. All video recording, image files, and databases shall be submitted in a digital format approved by the City’s project manager and electronically stored in a Granite Net 4.8 software, PACP database format, for proper data management. All video recording, image files, databases, and reports shall be generated using the Granite Net 4.8 software.
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 11 The digital CCTV inspections shall be submitted on an external hard drive with USB 2.0 connection. All submittals shall become the property of the City.
B. External hard drive(s), binder cover, and binder spine label shall include the following information on computer-generated labels:
1. City of South El Monte, Department of Public Works
2. General Consultant Name and Sub-Consultant Name
3. Project Number TBD
4. Start Date of CCTV Inspections (e.g. MM/DD/YYYY)
5. Finish Date of CCTV Inspections (e.g. MM/DD/YYYY)
Video and written reports shall be submitted to:
City of South El Monte
Department of Public Works
1415 Santa Anita Ave,
South El Monte, CA 91733
3. Review
A. The video recordings, photographs, and data shall be reviewed by the City for focus, lighting, clarity of view, and technical quality.
B. Videos or photographs recorded while a camera has flipped over in the process of traveling or the viewing of laterals, obstructions, or defects are blocked by cables, skids, or other equipment will not be accepted.
C. Shape, focus, proper lighting, and clear, distortion-free viewing during the camera operations shall be maintained. Failure to maintain these conditions will result in the rejection of the video and/or photographs by the City.
D. Videos or photographs recorded showing steam, inadequate lighting, or other poor image quality will be cause for rejection by the City.
E. Any reach of sewer where recording quality, inspection, and/or report is not acceptable to the City according to this RFP shall be re-televised, or data modified at no additional cost to the City.
5. KEY PERSONNEL
It is imperative that the key personnel providing the consulting services have the background, experience, and qualifications to complete the project. The City reserves RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 12 the right to approve all key personnel individually for work on this contract. All key staff shall be named in the contract. After the contract is signed, the proposer may not replace key staff unless their employment is terminated or agreed upon by the City. The City must approve replacement staff before a substitute person is assigned to the Project.
The City reserves the right to request that the proposer replace a staff person assigned to the contract should the City consider such a replacement to be for the good of the project.
6. CITY’S STANDARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
The RFP includes a sample of City’s Professional Services Agreement as Attachment D.
Proposers shall review the Agreement and provide a statement that they will comply with all aspects of the Agreement, or provide any comments that they would like the City to consider. The City Attorney will review any comment received and make a final decision if all or part or any of such comments may be considered.
7. INSURANCE COVERAGE LIMITS AND REQUIREMENTS
Consultant shall provide Insurance Coverage Limits and Requirements as indicated in this RFP as provided in Attachment D.
8. CONSULTANT SELECTION METHODOLOGY
The proposals will be evaluated based upon several factors. These factors may include:
Evaluation Criteria Max
Points
Completeness of the Proposals and compliance with the required RFP format. 10
Project understanding, scope, and approach to develop the project efficiently. 25
Experience and Qualifications of Key Staff. 25
Similar Project Experience, including familiarity with State and Federal procedures. 25
Effectiveness of Project Schedule showing how the proposer will be able to complete the design with required time duration 15 Total Points 100
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 13 As part of the evaluation, the City will also contact references listed in the proposal.
One-Step RFP: This Project will use One-Step RFP method per LAPM, as the scope of work is Project–specific and defined.
City Selection Panel will review the proposals received, and rank them based on the above criteria, and establish highest ranked consultant. The City may choose not to conduct oral interviews and negotiate a contract with the highest ranked consultant after the evaluation of written proposals.
At City’s discretion, the City may also conduct oral interviews with the top 3 ranked consultants. If oral interviews are conducted, the City will inform the selected proposers and provide the evaluation criteria for oral interviews at that time. After evaluations, the City will select the consultant who has is ranked highest.
After ranking, cost negotiations will begin with the most qualified consultant and only their cost proposal will be opened. Should negotiations fail or result in a price that the local agency does not consider fair and reasonable, negotiations must be formally terminated and the local agency must then undertake negotiations with the second most qualified consultant. If the negotiations with the second most qualified firm are not successful, negotiations must be formally terminated and the local agency must then undertake negotiations with the third most qualified consultant, and so on, until the price is determined to be fair and reasonable by the local agency.
Consultants Financial Management and Accounting System Requirements: It shall be noted that as indicated in LAPM for Federally Funded Projects, a contract shall not be awarded to a consultant without an adequate financial management and accounting system as required by 48 CFR Part 16.301-3, 2 CFR Part 200, and 48 CFR Part 31. The selected consultant shall have adequate financial management systems as required by the applicable federal regulations.
9. PREVAILING WAGE RATES
Depending upon the scope of work, the required contract provisions may include the California State Prevailing Wages (Federal Payment of Predetermined Minimum Wage applies only to federal-aid construction contracts). Prevailing wages will apply if the services to be performed will involve land surveying (such as flag persons, survey party chief, rodman or chainman), materials sampling and testing (such as drilling rig operators, pile driving, crane operators), inspection work, soils or foundation investigations, environmental hazardous materials and so forth. California State Prevailing Wage information is available through the California Department of Industrial Relations websites below. The selected Consultant will need to provide its Prevailing Wage Policy if their participation on the project includes prevailing wage work. The policy will include information on the accounting treatment of delta base and delta fringe, and verify the accounting treatment is consistent every year.
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 14
1. DIR FAQ website: http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/FAQ_PrevailingWage.html
2. DIR Wage Determination website:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/oprl/DPreWageDetermination.htm
3. Caltrans Prevailing Wage Interpretive Guidance:
https://ig.dot.ca.gov/resources/interpretive-guidance
10.CONTRACT AWARD
Any contract resulting from this RFP will be awarded to a firm whose Proposal meet the technical requirements of the RFP and is evaluated as the highest ranked proposal.
Proposals will be ranked in accordance with the evaluation criteria stated in this RFP.
Negotiations regarding a fair and reasonable price will occur subsequent to consultant selection. Should the City be unable to obtain a fair and reasonable price through negotiations with the highest qualified proposer, the City shall enter into negotiations with the next highest qualified proposer and may award that contract if the parties are able to arrive at a fair and reasonable price. If that is unattainable, the City shall enter into negotiations with the next highest qualified proposer in sequence until an agreement is reached.
11.REQUIRED FORMAT FOR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
Please submit your Proposal in the format specified below:
Cover Letter: Include the name, address, telephone number, title, and signature of the firm’s contact person for this proposal. The cover letter shall state that the submittal is valid for 120 days.
Table of Contents: Provide contents of proposal.
Section 1. Approach and Scope of Work: Provide your understanding of the project and describe your approach.
Section 2. Project Team, Key Personnel, and Resumes: Provide an organization chart showing the names and responsibilities of key personnel and subconsultants.
Section 3. Company Qualifications: Provide qualifications of prime consulting firm and sub-consultants.
Section 4. References: Provide five (5) Public Agency references for similar projects.
Section 5. City’s Standard Professional Services Agreement (see Attachment D.
Sample Professional Services Agreement): The referenced attachment is City’s RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 15 Standard Professional Services Agreement, which will be executed by the selected consultant. Proposers shall review the Agreement and provide a statement that they will comply with all aspects of the Agreement or provide any comments that they would like the City to consider. Please note that the City does not guarantee that any revisions to the contract will be accepted. The selected consultant shall be prepared to execute the contract as is, if the City does not accept any changes provided by the consultant.
Section 6. Addenda Acknowledgement: If any Addenda is issued by the City, the proposers shall include an acknowledgement of receiving such Addenda and their agreement with the terms and conditions stated in such Addenda. If no Addenda is issued, proposers shall state so in this section.
Section 7. Required Attachments: Below attachments shall be signed and submitted with the proposal:
• Attachment A - Affidavit of Non-Collusion
• Attachment B - Claims History
• Attachment C - California Levine Act Statement
The Fee Proposal shall be submitted in a separate envelope as indicated in the following section.
12.FEE ESTIMATE PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
Fee Proposal shall be submitted in a separate sealed envelope.
13.QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RFP
All questions regarding this RFP must be submitted via email:
John Poehler
Director of Public Works
[email protected]
Questions regarding this proposal shall be submitted via email to the above contact within the deadline identified on the RFP Schedule. In response to all questions received by this date, City will issue an Addendum on the date identified on the RFP Schedule prior to the proposal submittal due date. The addendum will be emailed to all RFP recipients on record.
14.PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL PROTOCOL
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 16 Interested and qualified firms shall submit their proposals as follows:
• Envelope 1: Technical Proposal, 1 bound copy and 1 pdf file on thumb drive.
Please indicate on the Proposal Cover:
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
FOR SANITARY SEWER CCTV AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT
• Envelope 2: Fee Proposal, 1 bound copy and 1 pdf file on thumb drive.
Please indicate on the Proposal Cover:
FEE PROPOSAL
FOR SANITARY SEWER CCTV AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Proposal submittal due date is:
April 10, 2024, 2:00 pm
Proposals shall be addressed to:
City of South El Monte
1415 Santa Anita Ave.
South El Monte, CA 91733
Attn: City Clerk’s Office
Late proposals will not be accepted.
Note: Use of the City seal is prohibited on any documents without City authorization.
Consultants shall not include City seal in their proposals without authorization.
15.PRE-CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES IN RESPONDING TO THE RFP PREPARATION The City shall not be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by any proposer or by any selected consultant. Each proposer shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all liability, claims, or expenses whosoever incurred by, or on behalf of, the entity participating in the preparation of its response to this RFP. Precontractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by proposers and the selected consultant, if any, in:
▪ Preparing and submitting information in response to this RFP. ▪ Negotiations with the City on any matter related to this procurement. ▪ Costs associated with interviews, meetings, travel or presentations. ▪ All other expenses incurred by a proposer/consultant prior to the date of award and a formal notice to proceed.
RFP, Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment RFP, Page 17 The City reserves the right to amend, withdraw and cancel this RFP. The City reserves the right to reject all responses to this request at any time prior to contract execution, or only award a partial contract for a limited scope of work. The City reserves the right to request or obtain additional information about any and all proposals.
END OF RFP
ATTACHMENTS TO FOLLOW
Attachment A Affidavit of Non-Collusion
Attachment B Claims History
Attachment C California Levine Act Statement
Attachment D Sample Professional Services Agreement
Attachment E System Inventory Map
12402-0001\2179898v2.doc Approved for Use 04/26/18
Attachment A, Page 1
ATTACHMENT A
AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COLLUSION
I state that I am _____________________________________ (title) of __________________________________ (name of firm) and that I am authorized to make this affidavit on behalf of my firm, and its owners, directors, and officers. I am the person responsible in my firm for the price(s) and the amount of this Offer.
I state that:
(1) The price(s) and amount of this Offer have been arrived at independently and without consultation, communication or agreement with any other Proposer or potential Proposer. (2) That neither the price(s) nor the amount of this Offer, and neither the approximate price(s) nor approximate amount of this Offer, have been disclosed to any other firm or person who is a Proposer or potential Proposer, and they will not be disclosed before Solicitation opening. (3) No attempt has been made or will be made to induce any firm or person to refrain from bidding on this contract, or to submit an Offer higher than this Offer, or to submit any intentionally high or noncompetitive Offer or other form of complementary Offer. (4) The Offer of my firm is made in good faith and not pursuant to any agreement or discussion with, or inducement from, any firm or person to submit a complementary or other noncompetitive Offer. (5) ________________________________________ (name of firm), its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors and employees are not currently under investigation by any governmental agency and have not in the last four years been convicted of or found liable for any act prohibited by State or Federal law in any jurisdiction, involving conspiracy or collusion with respect to bidding on any public contract, except as described in the attached appendix.
I state that________________________________________ (name of firm) understands and acknowledges that the above representations are material and important, and will be relied on by the City of South El Monte in awarding the contract(s) for which this Offer is submitted. I understand and my firm understands that any misstatement in this affidavit is and shall be treated as fraudulent concealment from the City of South El Monte of the true facts relating to the submission of Offers for this contract.
_________________________________________________
(Authorized Signature)
_________________________________________________
(Name of Company/Position)
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _______ day of __________________, 20___. _________________________________________________
Notary Public for California
My Commission Expires: __________________________
12402-0001\2179898v2.doc Approved for Use 04/26/18
Attachment B, Page 1
ATTACHMENT B
CLAIMS HISTORY
Each Consultant shall submit a summary of whether or not any of the following events have occurred within the past (10) years and, if so, a brief description of the circumstances involved (including, without limitation, the names of parties involved, current status and final disposition of the matter of dispute):
Failure to disclose any circumstances requested in the following paragraphs is grounds for disqualification.
▪ Failure by Consultant or any sub-consultant to enter into a contract to which it has received an award by a public entity.
▪ Forfeiture of a bid or proposal bond by proposer or any sub-consultant. ▪ Termination for default under a contract awarded by a public entity to Consultant or any sub-consultant.
▪ Debarment of Consultant or any sub-consultant by any municipal, county, state, federal, or local agency (note: debarment is grounds for automatic disqualification). ▪ The filing of a lawsuit or arbitration in which the Consultant or a sub-consultant was a defendant or cross-defendant at any time within the past ten (10) years that involved the performance of project, program, or engineering services and that involved an amount in controversy sought to be recovered from Consultant or the sub-consultant of more than $100,000.00.
▪ Conviction of Consultant, a sub-consultant, or any of their principals or officers for violation of a state or federal antitrust law involving bid rigging, collusion, or restriction on competition between bidders, or conviction of violating any other federal or state law relating to bidding or contract performance (note: such conviction is grounds for automatic disqualification).
▪ Any publications involving firm or principals alleging or claiming corruption (such claims are grounds for automatic disqualification).
▪ Any suspension, revocation, or other disciplinary proceeding relating to a contracting or professional license issued to proposer or a sub-consultant.
Attachment C, Page 1
ATTACHMENT C
California Levine Act Statement
Effective January 1, 2023, the Levine Act, as codified in California Government Code section 84308, commonly referred to as the “Levine Act,” prohibits any South El Monte City Councilmember from participating in any action related to a contract or application if he or she receives any political contributions totaling more than $250 within the previous twelve months, and for three months following the date of a final decision from the business/board or applicant.
The Levine Act also requires a member of the City of South El Monte Council who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record of the proceeding.
Current City of South El Monte Councilmembers are listed at:
https://www.cityofsouthelmonte.org/211/City-Council
Proposers are responsible for accessing this link to review the names prior to answering the following questions.
1. Have you or your company, or any agent/board member on behalf of you or your company/entity, made any political contributions of more than $250 to any City of South El Monte Councilmember in the 12 months preceding the date of submission of your proposal or application, or the anticipated date of any Council action?
____ YES If yes, please identify the Councilmember(s): ______________________________ ____ NO ______________________________
______________________________
______________________________
______________________________
2. Do you or your company/entity, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/entity, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $250 to any South El Monte City Councilmember in the 12 months following any Council action related to your proposal or application? ____ YES If yes, please identify the Councilmember(s): ______________________________ ____ NO ______________________________
______________________________
______________________________
______________________________
Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude the South El Monte City Council from awarding a contract or approving an application or any subsequent action. It could, preclude the identified Councilmember(s) from participating in any actions related to your proposal or application. _____________________________ ____________________________________ Date Signature of Authorized Individual
____________________________________
Print: Proposer Name
01257.0006/967571.1
ATTACHMENT D
SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
01257.0006/967571.1
CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT
By and Between
CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
and
__________________________________
01257.0006/967571.1 1
AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE AND
____________________
THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of ________, 2024 by and between the CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, a California, a municipal corporation (“City”) and ___________________________, _________________ (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.”
RECITALS
City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.
Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.
Pursuant to the City of South El Monte Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.
The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
1.1 Scope of Services.
In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder.
As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest 01257.0006/967571.1 2
professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more firstclass firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.
1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.
The Scope of Services shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.
1.3 Compliance with Law.
Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered.
1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.
Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.
1.5 Familiarity with Work.
By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer.
1.6 Care of Work.
The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.
01257.0006/967571.1 3
1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.
Both parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither party shall be responsible for the service of the other.
1.8 Additional Services.
City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed.
1.9 Special Requirements.
Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern.
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
2.1 Contract Sum.
Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed __________________________________ Dollars ($______) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8.
2.2 Method of Compensation.
01257.0006/967571.1 4
The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.
2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.
Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City.
Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.
2.4 Invoices.
Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance.
By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. The invoice shall contain all information specified in Exhibit “C”, and shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories:
labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.
City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.
2.5 Waiver.
Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.
ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
01257.0006/967571.1 5
3.1 Time of Essence.
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
3.2 Schedule of Performance.
Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively.
3.3 Force Majeure.
The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.
3.4 Term.
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding years from the date hereof, except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). [The City may, in its sole discretion, extend the Term for additional one-year terms.] ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK
4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.
The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
01257.0006/967571.1 6
(Name) (Title)
(Name) (Title)
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.
Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance.
4.2 Status of Consultant.
Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights.
4.3 Contract Officer.
The Contract Officer shall be [_____________________________] or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.
4.4 Independent Consultant.
01257.0006/967571.1 7
Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. Consultant represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to the City pursuant to this Agreement are classified by Consultant as employees and that Consultant issues or will issue a W-2 to such personnel.
In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, subcontractor, or independent contractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) to be classified as other than an independent contractor for the City, then Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgments, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to the City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Consultant or any of Consultant’s personnel used to provide the Services under this Agreement are other than independent contractors of the City.
4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.
The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.
ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
5.1 Insurance Coverages.
Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
01257.0006/967571.1 8
(a) General liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, $4,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.
(b) Automobile liability insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. (c) Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement. (d) Workers’ compensation insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).
(e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor.
All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Special Requirements in Exhibit “B”.
5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
(b) Duration of coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
(c) Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute 01257.0006/967571.1 9
with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
(d) City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement. (e) Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.
(f) Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants. (g) Enforcement of contract provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of noncompliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
(h) Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant.
Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. (j) Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be 01257.0006/967571.1 10
additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.
(k) Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. (l) Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (m) Pass through clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. (n) Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation.
(o) Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City.
(p) Timely notice of claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. (q) Additional insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
5.3 Indemnification.
To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of 01257.0006/967571.1 11
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith:
Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom;
In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.
Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION
6.1 Records.
Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times 01257.0006/967571.1 12
during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.
6.2 Reports.
Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.
6.3 Ownership of Documents.
All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City.
6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or 01257.0006/967571.1 13
work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.
(b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement.
Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under.
City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant.
However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION
7.1 California Law.
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California.
7.2 Disputes; Default.
In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default.
This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices 01257.0006/967571.1 14
during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
7.3 Retention of Funds.
Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.
7.4 Waiver.
Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.
Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.
7.6 Legal Action.
In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement. 01257.0006/967571.1 15
7.7 Liquidated Damages.
Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of this Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, the Contractor and its sureties shall be liable for and shall pay to the City the sum of $_________ (___________________________ Dollars) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any service required hereunder, as specified in the Schedule of Performance (Exhibit “D”). The City may withhold from any monies payable on account of services performed by the Contractor any accrued liquidated damages. Pursuant to Government Code Section 4215, Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay in completion of the project when such delay was caused by the failure of the public agency or owner of the utility to provide for removal or relocation of utility facilities.
7.8 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.
This Section shall govern any termination of this Contract except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.
7.9 Termination for Default of Consultant.
If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.
7.10 Attorneys’ Fees.
01257.0006/967571.1 16
If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorney’s fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.
ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION
8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.
No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.
8.2 Conflict of Interest.
Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.
No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.
Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.
8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.
01257.0006/967571.1 17
Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.
ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
9.1 Notices.
Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of South El Monte, 1415 Santa Anita Avenue, South El Monte, California 91733 and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement.
Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing.
Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.
9.2 Interpretation.
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
9.3 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.
9.4 Integration; Amendment.
This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
9.5 Severability.
In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or 01257.0006/967571.1 18
decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.
No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.
Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect.
Consultant’s Authorized Initials _______
9.7 Corporate Authority.
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
01257.0006/967571.1 19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.
CITY:
CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, a municipal
corporation
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
Anthony R. Taylor, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:
___________________________________
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
Address:
If applicable, two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND
APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE
BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.
01257.0006/967571.1
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On __________, 2024 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
I. Signature: _____________________________________
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER_______________________________
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
___________________________________
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________
DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. 01257.0006/967571.1
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
On __________, 2024 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
II. Signature: _____________________________________
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________
TITLE(S)
PARTNER(S) LIMITED
GENERAL
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER_______________________________
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
___________________________________
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________
DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document. 01257.0006/967571.1 A-1
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
III. Consultant will perform the following Services:
A.
B.
C.
IV. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City:
A.
B.
C.
V. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports:
A.
B.
C.
VI. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.
VII. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services:
A.
B.
C.
01257.0006/967571.1 B-1
EXHIBIT “B”
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)
The Agreement is amended as provided herein. Deleted text is indicated in strikethrough and added text in bold italics.
01257.0006/967571.1 C-1
EXHIBIT “C”
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks at the following rates:
RATE TIME SUB-BUDGET
A. __________ __________ __________ __________
B. __________ __________ __________ __________
C. __________ __________ __________ __________
D. __________ __________ __________ __________
II. A retention of ten percent (10%) shall be held from each payment as a contract retention to be paid as part of the final payment upon satisfactory completion of services.
III. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8.
IV. The City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:
A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.
B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.
C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.
D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.
V. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.
VI. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1. 01257.0006/967571.1 D-1
EXHIBIT “D”
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all services timely in accordance with the following schedule:
Days to Perform Deadline Date
A. Task A ______________ ______________
B. Task B ______________ ______________
C. Task C ______________ ______________
II. Consultant shall deliver the following tangible work products to the City by the following dates.
A.
B.
C.
III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2.
ATTACHMENT E
SYSTEM INVENTORY MAP
¬"!
¬"!
8 6
10 12
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 10 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 6
8 8
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 12
8 8
12 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 10
12 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 8
12 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8 8
8 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 6
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 12
8 8
8 8
8 8
12 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
12 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 6
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 6
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 12
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 10
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 12
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 12
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
10 10
10 8
6 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
12 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 10
8 8
12 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
7 2
6 667
5 65
94 63
64 49
96 95
58 99 97
13 21
19 66
10 50
91 98
51 24
41 11
93 938
68 28
12 71
92 44
17 48
67 18
59 25
46 731
27 62
77 23
29 43
3 45
70 502
821
42 116
820
435
20 853
952
373
717
529
559
55 637
663
315
486
423
653
822
257
634
867
633
143
741
103
944
947
485
105
570
200
156 154
626
657
569
869
153
468
155
398
656
636
648
870
152
676
647
151
449
675
126
306
518
793
565
544
655
160
400
171
336
265
106
945
848
138
662
516
642
467
408
413
585
682
491
339
245
417
254
635
871
726
918
684
172
376
166 545
113
708
119
772
808
674
114
643
825
773
108
118
128
320
159
664
416
450
797
624
199
701
826
163
920
612
107
954
533
588
424
261
164
372
914
136
575
892
4 631
425
629
314
201
139
303
955
922
891
475
621
104
747
180
686
399
604
237
651
750
606
609
628 627
610
422
620
742
140
802
619
816
571
195
566
815
577
904
558
193
297
716
102
125
205
446
770
196
746
800
185
913
421
503
466
749
782
167
818
697
607
941
202
844
838
165
511
337
359
447
311
168
917
343
448
599
174
593
763
207
887
677
762
268
824
22 668
801
471
832
685
841
269
198
512
911 539
137
481
240
895
893
897
110
418
490
127
325
157
681
794
574
696
743
560
508
592 75
111
459
463
457
705
347
365
912
942
461
704
910
748
661
181
476
255
182
672
377
472
715
905
442
177
121
888
498
739 740
370
433
409
204
567
482
625
100
864
326
499
441
256
183
184
603
769
142
489
725
521
775
477
178
473
141
194
894
630
896
898
658
144
443
37 557
238
669
693
812
707
694
444
358
426
523
534
369
827
713
623
112
854
135
57 432
203
513
497
646
839
493
611
632
115
640
774
608
765
495
622
36 494
670
348
680
683
578
723
845
496
579
321
799
436
440
506
414
699
880
129
197
474
109
798
689
602
583
605
371
803
451
388
517
649
251
690
76 807
302
462
453
760
386
724
761
712
334
859
580
951
860
804
673
548
354
395
600
122
253
863
262
541
437
520
304
721
507
327
522
123
319
795
766
252
355
930
404
239
833
179
323
792
504
456
406
455
16 484
35 660
929
301
492
581
307
524
213
296
650
768
573
349
454
873
212
407
851
401
379
638
403
434
117
130
728
618
861
352
338
597
61 460
615
124
528
718
263
361
242
671
885
865
483
133 132
722
353
665
923
241
430
720
69 691
598
402
924
537
915
362
368
616 613
527
458
324
385
729
15 429
617
120
214
700
847
505
805
260
817
902
601
852
925
639
950
903
889
290
698
679
933
806
614
796
877
341
654
882
335
14 890
840
719
855
270
9 526 525
415
271
176
759
175
953
584
594
836
351
309
273
868
956
695
596
186
576
291
479
589
564
500
134
874
266
850
908
272
572
162
452
161
837
714
771
595
169
342
170
26 310
519
317
478
835
356
382
641
872
678
823
949
32 258
732
300
364
34 926
318
346
764
582
811
692
909
394
948
538
939
357
809
767
264
396
480
47 383
514
501
907
292
834
730
866
378
706
883
Rush
Chico
Central
Potrero
Lee
Merced
Tyler
Troy
Santa Anita
Durfee
Weaver
Thienes
Loma
Rosemead
Lerma
Michael Hunt
Seaman
Edwards
Cogswell
Klingerman
Millet
Garvey
Enloe
Allgeyer
Penn Mar
Peck
Floradale
Sastre
Vacco
Bruin
Galax
Alpaca
Kale
Schmidt
Strozier
Continental
Linard
Doreen
Mabel
Adelia
Maplefield
Lidcombe
Fern
Broadmead
State Highway 60
Tamora
Farndon
Linn
Byways
Parlin
Luder
Alesia
Giovane
Fawcett
Lexham
Bunker
Remer
Lorin
Delco
Marybeth
Lexington-Gallatin
Farmer
Havenpark
Leafdale
El Poche
Elliott
Fruitvale
Lawton
Burkett
Bunker
Lee
Enloe
Seaman
Alpaca
Fern
Garvey
Peck
Lexham
Luder
El Poche
Adelia
Alesia
Penn Mar
Klingerman
Remer
Durfee
Fern
Garvey
Delco
Strozier
Doreen
Fern
Farndon
Santa Anita
State Highway 60
Alesia
Durfee
Penn Mar
Fern
Adelia
Loma
Sastre
Legend
Manholes
¬"! Sewer Lift Station
City Lines (OID Number 160, Pize Size 8 Inches)
County Sanitation District Lines
City Boundary
µ
System Inventory Map
City of South El Monte
City of South El Monte
EXHIBIT 2
System Inventory Map
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
(Object ID Number and Pipe Size)
(Object ID Number and Pipe Size)
160
8 ADVANCED
APPLIED
ENGINEERING
ATTACHMENT B
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 8.a.
DATE: March 12, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Guillermo Arreola, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY'S
REVISED 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT IN
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS BY THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21-01
SUMMARY: A Resolution to adopt the City's revised 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element in response to Comments by the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing;
2. Take public testimony; and
3. Continue item to the next regular city council meeting on Tuesday, March 26, 2024.
FISCAL/FINANCIAL IMPACT: Adoption of the City's 6th Cycle Housing Element will allow the City to be eligible for federal, state, and regional funding programs.
DISCUSSION: Staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to the March 26, 2024, City Council meeting. City staff have been in contact with the Department of Housing and Community Development and the City’s consultant, WSP, and a continuance is necessary to fully address the issues raised by HCD.
ATTACHMENT(S):
None
457
2023 BLIND RFI ANALYSIS
Attachment A
457 PLAN FEES ARE
100% PAID BY
PARTICIPANTS
• CITY COUNCIL IS PERSONALLY
LIABLE
• CITY FINANCE MANAGER AND HR
ARE ALSO PERSONALLY LIABLE
• FIDUCIARY MUST KNOW WHAT
PLAN COSTS ARE AND CONFIRM
THAT THESE ARE REASONABLE.
• THIS ANALYSIS WAS COMPLETED IN
ORDER TO MEET THIS FIDUCIARY
DUTY.
UNDERSTANDING ROLES:
FIDUCIARY BY FUNCTION, TITLE, OR INFLUENCE
OVER PLAN ASSETS = PERSONALLY LIABLE
Fiduciary
City Council
Administrators
Finance Manager
3 DISADVANTAGE OF BEING A SMALL
457
(IN THIS CASE SEVERAL SMALL
PLANS)
• SMALLER PLANS PAY LARGER FEES TO MAKE UP FOR THE
REVENUE VENDOR NEEDS TO COVER ADMIN COSTS
• Hence the smaller the plans, the larger the admin fees (typically)
• Lose Economies of scale to drop these hidden fees
• Lose level of attention and resources when small compared to large plans • Higher administrative liability coordinating and compliance management. (Vendor gets paid a % of assets of total 457 plan)
4 BLIND RFI CONDUCTED
IN 2023
• BLIND RFI WENT OUT TO MARKET
• RESPONSES CAME FROM
• NATIONWIDE
• MISSION SQUARE (ICMA)
• EMPOWER (GW, PRU, MASSMU)
• VOYA
• CALPERS^* (standardized fee)
457 PLAN RFI
DESIGN FEES SERVICES
EXPENS RATIO AND ADMIN
FEE
VOYA • 0.53% GROSS
$350,000
• GROSS: 2.28%
• 2.20% Admin
Fees $7,700
NATIONWIDE
$2.3MM
• GROSS: 1.09%
• 0.78% ADMIN
FEE $17,019
BEFORE
AFTER
ESTIMATED SAVINGS
CURRENT AVERAGE TOTAL FEES = 1.27%
(WEIGHTED AVG EXPENSE FROM BOTH PUT TOGETHER)
SAVINGS FROM RENEGOTIATION=
0.70%DECREASE IN COST
7 • INCLUSIVE IF FIDUCIARY SUPPORT
(10BPS)
Recordkeeping fee = 0.38%
Investment Manager Fees* = 0.15%
1 YEAR SAVINGS
$22,250
• 0.89% SAVINGS
• ON $2.5MM
5 YEAR SAVINGS
$111,250
10 YEAR SAVINGS
$225,000
BENEFITS TO
CONSIDER • Full Transparency – excess gets credited back to your account quarterly.
• Lower fees with full access to entire fund
universe
• Remove conflicts of interest • Access to CFP no matter your balance • Treated as a mid-size plan versus a two small plans
• Better credit rate of interest on fixed assets
8 REVAMP
FUNDS FREE
FROM
CONFLICTS
OF INTEREST
OR
PROPRIETARY
PRODUCT
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND Consolidation allows for open
architecture: Meaning you can
use any fund in the universe
on any platform
COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT INCLUDES:
FUNDS - INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
INDEPENDENTLY MONITORED
10 • SET UP IPS
• REVIEW PERFORMANCE AND
COMPLIANCE QUARTERLY
• EDUCATION AND SUPPORT
• CONTINUOUS FEE REDUCTION AS
PLAN GROWS
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.a.
DATE: March 12, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Masami Higa, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO.
24-136, CREATING A 457B AND 401A OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE (COMMITTEE); AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL
TO DELEGATE FIDUCIARY OVERSIGHT OF THE 457B AND
401A PLANS TO THE COMMITTEE, AUTHORIZING THE
COMMITTEE TO CONSOLIDATE THE 457B AND 401A PLANS
UNDER ONE RECORDKEEPER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO APPOINT THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS; AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH FIDUCIARY EXPERTS,
LLC, AN ERISA 3(38) CONSULTANT
SUMMARY: Staff is recommending City Council create a retirement benefit oversight committee in order to better carry out the City's fiduciary duty to manage the cost of the retirement plan and to lower the fees being charged to its members.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution 24-136, Creating a 457B and 401A Oversight Committee; Delegating fiduciary oversight of the 457B and 401A from the City Council to the Committee; authorizing the Committee to consolidate the 457B and 401A plans under one record keeper; authorizing the City Manager to appoint the committee members; and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Fiduciary Experts, LLC, an ERISA 3(38) Consultant.
FISCAL/FINANCIAL IMPACT: Once the Consultant helps the City consolidate the employees' assets held by Nationwide and Voya to Empower, an estimated 70% reduction in plan administrative fees is expected, or roughly $20,000 each year.
DISCUSSION: Under Section 457(b) and 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), government entities may sponsor a deferred compensation plan, while meeting fiduciary responsibilities under California law, to allow employees to defer income tax on retirement savings into future years. Since 1983 the City has provided employer sponsored deferred compensation plans under Section 457(b) of the IRC. Today the city has two 457 plan recordkeepers, Nationwide and Voya.
Under the California State Constitution, Article XVI Section 17, government entities that sponsor a 457(b) and/or 401(a) plan have fiduciary responsibilities to ensure the operation and investment of the public retirement plan is for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants and beneficiaries. The fiduciary responsibilities are to:
• Invest the assets of the plan
• Administer the plan
• Engage in a prudent process for making all decisions related to the operation of the plan, including decisions related to the plan’s investments and related services Due to the complexity of the investment process and responsibilities, staff met with Fiduciary Experts, LLC (Consultant), a retirement plan consulting firm to learn more about trends affecting the 457(b) and 401(a) marketplace and laws governing fiduciary requirements for the operation and investment of the City’s sponsored plans.
As a fiduciary, the City has a responsibility to control the investment choices made available in the plans with Nationwide and Voya. To ensure the plans and their assets were overseen in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, staff asked Consultant to conduct a Request for Information (RFI). This was performed at no cost to the City or participants of those plans.
The RFI included a review of all contract related data, including but not limited to administrative fees associated with those plans, investment options, asset values, fixed account interest rates, and additional fees that may be charged by the plans. RFI results showed that the City could obtain a similar plan with a 50% reduction in fees currently being charged by Nationwide and an 80% reduction in fees currently being charged by Voya.
Currently, City Council members have personal liability for the fiduciary oversight of the plan. Staff believe the plan can be better overseen by creating an oversight committee which is advised by an ERISA 3(38) fiduciary consultant who can keep the committee better informed on a timely manner. However, once City Council delegates its fiduciary oversight authority to the committee, the committee members now have personal liability, so staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to appoint the oversight committee members. Presently, staff anticipates the committee members to consists of the City Manager, Director of Finance, Director of Human Resources, Director of Public Works, and one union representative each from SEMEA and SEMEMTA. However, because committee members will have personal liability, union representatives may not want to become a committee member. In those instances, the committee is expected to provide copies of its meeting minutes to the union representatives to be transparent.
Staff would like to seek the assistance of Consultant to guide the City through the consolidation process from Nationwide and Voya to Empower. After the consolidation process is complete, staff would like to seek guidance from Consultant to help the committee implement a due diligences process, to ensure the City is meeting its fiduciary responsibilities under its plan, and to obtain investment advisory and consulting services. For an annual flat fee of $5,000, Fiduciary Experts, LLC, has proposed to provide the following services:
1. Consultant will provide the City with fiduciary services consistent with Prudent Expert Rule of ERISA, as it pertains to this scope of services and the City’s oversight of its deferred compensation plan.
2. Consultant will assist the City to formalize a Deferred Compensation Plan Oversight Committee. Consultant will provide oversight and educate the Deferred Compensation Plan Oversight Committee on their roles and responsibilities. Consultant will document the oversight process for proper follow up and compliance.
3. Consultant will assist the City to establish a written Investment Policy Statement.
Consultant shall perform annual review of the City’s Investment Policy Statement to ensure it is meeting the needs of the City and the deferred compensation participants.
4. Consultant shall perform comprehensive semi-annual investment analysis review of the City’s deferred compensation plan and the plan participants' investment options, as well as additional options and asset classes to consider. Consultant will review Plan’s diversification among investment options through a correlation matrix and overlap analysis and Plan level performance compared to passive and active custom benchmarks. Consultant will assist the City with ensuring that the Plan is in compliance with the requirements of section 404(c) by determining that the fund line up constitutes a broad range of investment alternatives, as defined in regulations section 29 CFR 2550.404(c)-1.
5. Consultant will prepare a Plan Expense Summary separating service costs and management costs to estimate service provider revenues with a detailed analysis of revenue distribution to service provider and all related parties.
6. Consultant will be available, as requested, but not less than once per year, to meet with the Deferred Compensation Plan Oversight Committee and present the annual review results, provide compliance updates, and recommend any needed administrative updates.
7. Consultant will organize bi-annual seminars with special investment and planning subjects to support participant education. Consultant will provide custom communication and outreach to employees as a means to support their retirement efforts and goals in coordination of the City’s deferred compensation service provider.
ATTACHMENT(S):
A. 2024 City Council Presentation- SOUTH EL MONTE BLIND RFI RESULTS_FINAL B. Resolution No. 24-136_457 Plan Oversight Committee_03042024(967355.1) 457
2023 BLIND RFI ANALYSIS
Attachment A
457 PLAN FEES ARE
100% PAID BY
PARTICIPANTS
• CITY COUNCIL IS PERSONALLY
LIABLE
• CITY FINANCE MANAGER AND HR
ARE ALSO PERSONALLY LIABLE
• FIDUCIARY MUST KNOW WHAT
PLAN COSTS ARE AND CONFIRM
THAT THESE ARE REASONABLE.
• THIS ANALYSIS WAS COMPLETED IN
ORDER TO MEET THIS FIDUCIARY
DUTY.
UNDERSTANDING ROLES:
FIDUCIARY BY FUNCTION, TITLE, OR INFLUENCE
OVER PLAN ASSETS = PERSONALLY LIABLE
Fiduciary
City Council
Administrators
Finance Manager
3 DISADVANTAGE OF BEING A SMALL
457
(IN THIS CASE SEVERAL SMALL
PLANS)
• SMALLER PLANS PAY LARGER FEES TO MAKE UP FOR THE
REVENUE VENDOR NEEDS TO COVER ADMIN COSTS
• Hence the smaller the plans, the larger the admin fees (typically)
• Lose Economies of scale to drop these hidden fees
• Lose level of attention and resources when small compared to large plans • Higher administrative liability coordinating and compliance management. (Vendor gets paid a % of assets of total 457 plan)
4 BLIND RFI CONDUCTED
IN 2023
• BLIND RFI WENT OUT TO MARKET
• RESPONSES CAME FROM
• NATIONWIDE
• MISSION SQUARE (ICMA)
• EMPOWER (GW, PRU, MASSMU)
• VOYA
• CALPERS^* (standardized fee)
457 PLAN RFI
DESIGN FEES SERVICES
EXPENS RATIO AND ADMIN
FEE
VOYA • 0.53% GROSS
$350,000
• GROSS: 2.28%
• 2.20% Admin
Fees $7,700
NATIONWIDE
$2.3MM
• GROSS: 1.09%
• 0.78% ADMIN
FEE $17,019
BEFORE
AFTER
ESTIMATED SAVINGS
CURRENT AVERAGE TOTAL FEES = 1.27%
(WEIGHTED AVG EXPENSE FROM BOTH PUT TOGETHER)
SAVINGS FROM RENEGOTIATION=
0.70%DECREASE IN COST
7 • INCLUSIVE IF FIDUCIARY SUPPORT
(10BPS)
Recordkeeping fee = 0.38%
Investment Manager Fees* = 0.15%
1 YEAR SAVINGS
$22,250
• 0.89% SAVINGS
• ON $2.5MM
5 YEAR SAVINGS
$111,250
10 YEAR SAVINGS
$225,000
BENEFITS TO
CONSIDER • Full Transparency – excess gets credited back to your account quarterly.
• Lower fees with full access to entire fund
universe
• Remove conflicts of interest • Access to CFP no matter your balance • Treated as a mid-size plan versus a two small plans
• Better credit rate of interest on fixed assets
8 REVAMP
FUNDS FREE
FROM
CONFLICTS
OF INTEREST
OR
PROPRIETARY
PRODUCT
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND Consolidation allows for open
architecture: Meaning you can
use any fund in the universe
on any platform
COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT INCLUDES:
FUNDS - INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
INDEPENDENTLY MONITORED
10 • SET UP IPS
• REVIEW PERFORMANCE AND
COMPLIANCE QUARTERLY
• EDUCATION AND SUPPORT
• CONTINUOUS FEE REDUCTION AS
PLAN GROWS
ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION NO. 24-136
A RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH EL MONTE CITY COUNCIL
CREATING A 457B AND 401A OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (COMMITTEE);
AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL TO DELEGATE FIDUCIARY OVERSIGHT OF THE 457B AND 401A PLANS TO THE COMMITEE, AUTHORIZING THE COMMITTEE TO CONSOLIDAE THE 457B AND 401A PLANS UNDER ONE RECORDKEEPER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPOINT
THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH FIDUCIEARY
EXPERTS, LLC, AN ERISA 3(38) CONSULTANT
WHEREAS, the City has certain administrative and investment oversight duties and authority as sponsor and administrator of its Retirement Plans, and in performing such duties, must act for the exclusive benefit of Retirement Plan participants and their beneficiaries; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the City acts as a fiduciary insofar as it exercise discretion in administering or carrying out its oversight of the Retirement Plans; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to create a 457(b) and 401(a) Oversight Committee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to delegate its administrative and fiduciary plan oversight responsibilities to the Committee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council authorize the Committee to consolidate the 457(b) and 401(a) plans under one recordkeeper; and
WHEREAS, the City Council authorize the City Manager to appoint the committee members; and
WHEREAS, the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Fiduciary Experts, LLC, an ERISA 3(38) Consultant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South El Monte as follows:
Section 1. City Council hereby creates a 457(b) and 401(a) Oversight Committee; and Section 2. City Council hereby delegates authority and fiduciary responsibility to the Committee, to take such actions deemed necessary or advisable to perform the administrative and investment duties by the delegated authority; and
Section 3. City Council may revoke or change such delegation of authority and responsibilities under one or more of the Retirement Plans at any time; and Section 4. City Council hereby authorize the Committee to consolidate the 457(b) and 401(a) plans under one recordkeeper; and
Section 5. City Council hereby authorize the City Manager to appoint the 457(b) and 401(a) Oversight Committee members; and
Section 6. The 457(b) and 401(a) Oversight Committee is authorized to delegate some of his or her administrative and oversight duties and authority to a licensed investment advisor to assist the Committee in carrying out the administrative and fiduciary responsibilities by evaluating the vendors, services, vendor products, fees, compliance, and participant education made available to the employees for investing in the Retirement Plan; and Section 7. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate and execute an agreement with Fiduciary Experts, LLC, an ERISA 3(38) consultant.
Section 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of March 2024. _____________________________
Gloria Olmos, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:
CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE )
I, Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk of the City of South El Monte, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 24-136 was passed and approved by the City Council of the City of South El Monte at a Regular meeting of said Council held on the 27th day of February 2024, and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmember(s):
NOES: Councilmember(s):
ABSTAINED: Councilmember(s):
_____________________________
Donna G. Schwartz, City Clerk
City Council Agenda Report
Agenda Item No. 9.b.
DATE: March 12, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Rene Salas, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: John Poehler, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF THE 2023 UPDATE
TO THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY: To effectively optimize the City’s limited fiscal resources, City staff enlisted the services of Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc to develop a Pavement Management Plan (PMP). This plan provides current data on the City’s street networks and formulates cost-effective maintenance and rehabilitation strategies to maintain a desirable level of pavement performance on a network scale.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends City Council:
1. Receive and file the Updated 2023 Pavement Management Program;
2. Adopt and approve the recommended 5-year pavement program, allocating an annual budget of approximately $1.4 million, resulting in a total budget of approximately $7 million over 5 years; and
3. Direct the City Manager to implement the plan.
FISCAL/FINANCIAL IMPACT: The recommended pavement rehabilitation projects under Pavement Management Program (PMP) will be funded by a combination of funding sources, including SB1/RMRA (Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account), Measure M, Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), and Prop C funds. The City is currently updating its capital improvement budget in order to program potential funding sources for this project, and will report back to City Council as the FY2025 budget gets formalized.
DISCUSSION: A Pavement Management Program (PMP) serves as a crucial planning and budgeting tool utilized to prioritize street paving and maintenance projects over a five-year period. Federal funding for street rehabilitation projects mandates that every mile of eligible Federal-Aid highway within the City (major arterials) be managed with a PMP. Additionally, eligibility for State Proposition C funding requires the implementation and updating of a PMP every three years. The PMP provides a formal systematic approach to assessing, monitoring, and managing the condition of highway pavements in the most cost-effective manner possible. The results of the study aid in determining the most appropriate locations and the optimum approach to pavement rehabilitation.
A basic PMP involves dividing the City's street network into segments of approximately one-block lengths. The segments are evaluated by counting the number of cracks, measuring the size and type of cracking and collecting other pavement surface information. The measurements are analyzed mathematically and each segment is given a condition rating number (between 0 and 100) that is used to rank the streets in the order of their conditions. Combined with data on traffic volumes and pavement thicknesses, the program processes the condition data and produces recommendations for which streets to repair, in what order, the optimum method of repair, and the estimated costs. This information is used to prioritize and schedule street rehabilitation through the long-range Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and budget process. The local street system is also monitored and managed by the PMP.
In January 2023, the City awarded a professional services agreement to Bucknam Infrastructure Group to prepare and update the City’s Pavement Management Program.
In January 2024, Bucknam completed the final Citywide Pavement Management Program report (Attachment No. 1).
PMP is a Planning Tool, and is updated based on ongoing Engineering Evaluations:
The recommendations generated by the PMP are for planning purposes only, and are not intended to replace sound engineering judgment for actual construction. The PMP is used as the basis for making strategic decisions to plan future work effectively and cost efficiently. The City Engineer conducts field observations to update and supplement the information in the PMP report to develop cost effective projects with efficient cost/benefit ratio based on field conditions, other relevant projects, budget availability, and various other factors that may exist at the time.
Pavement Condition Index (PCI):
The PCI system is a rating mechanism used to describe the condition of the City’s pavement and has been adopted as the nation’s standard rating system by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Ranging between "0" and"100," a PCI of "0" would correspond to a badly deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life, while a PCI of "100" would correspond to a pavement with proper engineering design and construction at the beginning of its life cycle.
Effective Preventative Maintenance Approach:
Preventative maintenance on streets with better than average PCI ratings must be considered in combination with the more extensive rehabilitation of failing streets to realize the maximum net benefit and reduce the long term costs. As pavement ages, the system predicts the PCI of the pavement based on the deterioration curves. Once a street segment reaches a PCI of 40, the street segment deteriorates at a faster rate per the standard deterioration curve for asphalt pavement.
Condition of City’s pavement:
Per the PMP Report, the overall condition of the City of South El Monte’s road network is “Fair”, with an average weighted Pavement Condition Index of 63. Arterial streets are “Fair” with a PCI of 64.7, and local streets are “Fair” with a PCI of 61.9, with 100 being a brand-new street and 0 being a badly deteriorated street with virtually no remaining life.
Replacement value and quantity of pavement:
The pavement network within the City of South El Monte has approximately 43.8 miles of paved surfaces, comprised of approximately 15.1 miles of arterial streets, and 28.7 miles of local streets. This equates to approximately 8.1 million square feet of pavement.
The estimated replacement value of this pavement is approximately $68.8 million.
Preservation program and costs:
A strategy was developed based on a 5-year funding cycle. This strategy involves two traditional pavement rehabilitation treatments including both asphalt slurry seal and asphalt concrete overlays as preservation components. The strategy also used a 5% annual inflation factor for all maintenance costs. The following scenarios have been analyzed in the preparation of the report:
Scenario 1: Increase Pavement Current Network Condition (PCI) to 66.5 (Spend $1.4 million per year for 5 years program):
This scenario shows the impact of the City’s anticipated pavement rehabilitation budget of $1.4 million per year over the next 5 years, with a total budget of approximately $7 million over 5 years. Per this scenario, at the end of 5-year program, the average citywide pavement condition index would increase to PCI level of 66.5 (3.5 points increase).
Scenario 2: Maintain Current Pavement Network Condition (PCI) at 63 (Spend $0.8 million per year for 5 years program):
This scenario shows the impact of the City’s anticipated pavement rehabilitation budget of $0.8 million per year over the next 5 years, with a total budget of approx. $4.0 million over 5 years. Per this scenario, at the end of 5-year program, the average city-wide pavement condition index would remain at the current PCI level of 63.
Staff report was collaboratively prepared by Andrés González, Senior Public Works Analyst and the staff from TransTech.
ATTACHMENT(S):
A. South El Monte Final PMP Report rev5
FINAL REPORT
UPDATE OF
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
(Citywide)
2023-2028
Submitted to:
City of South El Monte, CA
June 14, 2023
100-21
June 14, 2023
Mr. Rene Salas
City Manager
City of South El Monte
600 S. South El Monte Avenue
South El Monte, CA 91016
Subject: Final Report - Update of the Pavement Management Program Dear Mr. Salas:
As part of the 2023 Update of the Pavement Management Program for the City of South El Monte, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. (Bucknam) is pleased to submit the Final Report for the City’s pavement network.
The information contained in this report was used to develop the recommended improvement program for the pavement network. The report covers the following categories:
• Executive Summary (Section I)
• Pavement Management Program Development and Reporting (Section II) • Pavement Conditions For Each Segment in the Network (PCI Report – Section III) The Pavement Condition Index report shows the present condition of each street in the pavement network. In addition, the report shows the basic geometry of each street segment. • Forecast Maintenance & Rehabilitation (FMR) Reports (Section IV) • Recommended Maintenance and Repair Strategies
The recommended maintenance and repair strategies were used to generate the Forecast Maintenance & Rehabilitation Report and were based on our 2023 inspections. Additionally, we have assessed and incorporated unit cost and maintenance application practices/types with our strategies. • Projected Projects based on M&R Strategies
The FMR Report projects the street maintenance activities required for the next five years, broken down to show maintenance levels for Arterials, Collectors, Locals and Alley streets. The data included in this report is organized by fiscal year.
Our thorough analysis of previous and current South El Monte PMP strategies enabled our staff to make proactive recommendations to the City’s pavement CIP. All comments received from the City have been incorporated in the reports that follow. All of the City’s issues and needs that were brought to our attention are included in the report. It has been a pleasure working with you and the City on updating your Pavement Management Program. We look forward to the continued success of this project and future teamwork with City staff.
Sincerely,
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Peter J. Bucknam
Project Manager
Infrastructure Management – GIS Services
City of South El Monte Page i
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary
A. City’s Pavement Network
B. Current Citywide Conditions
C. Maintenance Strategy Development
D. Annual Budget Projections
E. Quality Control Efforts
F. Findings and Recommendations
II. Pavement Management Program-Capital Improvement Program A. PMP Scope of Work
B. Maintenance Strategy Assignments
C. Multi-Year Annual Work Program Projects
i. Increase PCI Budget
ii. Maintain PCI Budget
D. Condition Distribution Report
E. Calculation of PCI
F. Sample Distress Photos – Recommended Treatment
III. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Reports
A. PCI Reports - Definitions
B. South El Monte 2023 PCI Map
C. Name Order (A to Z)
D. PCI Order (0-100)
IV. Forecast Maintenance / Rehabilitation Report
A. Increase PCI Budget, Five Year Plan (2023-2028)
B. Forecast Maintenance / Rehabilitation FY 2023-2028 Maps City of South El Monte Page ii
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023
Table and Figure Reference Page #
Figure 1 – Pavement Area (SF) by Street Classification Sec 1-2 Figure 2 – Historical PCI Findings (FY 2018-2023) Sec 1-3 Figure 3 – PCI Distribution by Section Mileage for All Streets Sec 1-6 Figure 4 – Sample Pavement Life Cycle Sec 2-3
Figure 5 – Five Year Projection; Increase PCI to 66 Budget Sec 2-6 Figure 6 – Five Year Projection; Maintain PCI of 63 Budget Sec 2-8 Figure 7 – PCI Calculation Worksheet Sec 2-11
Figure 8 – South El Monte MyRoads® PMP Web-Portal Sec 2-12 Figure 9 – Arterial Condition Distribution Sec 2-13
Figure 10 – Local Condition Distribution Sec 2-13
Figure 11 – Sample Distress Photos – Recommended Treatment Sec 2-14 Figure 12 – 2023 South El Monte Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Map Sec 3-4 Figure 13 – Forecast Maintenance & Rehabilitation (FMR) Maps – Increase PCI Sec 4-4 to 4-9 Table 1 – Past and Present PCI Results and Comparisons Sec 1-3 Table 2 – Condition Distribution by Section Mileage for All Streets Sec 1-4 Table 3 – Five-Year Projection Demonstrating Annual Budget to Increase PCI to 66 Sec 1-9 Table 4 – Five Year Projection Demonstrating Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 63 Sec 1-9 Table 5 – Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Ranges Sec 2-2 Table 6 – Maintenance Strategy Assignments Sec 2-2
Table 7 – Necessary Funding to Increase PCI to 66 Sec 2-6 Table 8 – Necessary Funding to Maintain PCI of 63 Sec 2-7 Acronym Listing
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE)
Asphalt Concrete (AC)
Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM)
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Geographic Information System (GIS)
Los Angeles County MTA (METRO)
Maintenance and Repair (M&R)
Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
Pavement Management Program (PMP)
Portland Cement Concrete (PCC)
City of South El Monte Page 1
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
SECTION I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2023 UPDATE OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
This report reflects the continued commitment and proactive management of the City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP); the last major update to the City’s PMP was performed in 2018. As the City of South El Monte continues to show growth in its population, demographics, infrastructure and maintenance needs, the street network is demonstrating similar needs in regard to capital revenues and capital improvement program management.
Today, the City is currently using the Army Corps of Engineers pavement management program, MicroPAVER, to manage the 43.8 miles within street network. This software is essential to the City in that it assists Public Works staff in identifying what levels of annual funding are needed to maintain and/or improve the pavement conditions across the network. These funds are vital for the annual arterial / collector street capital improvement program projects as well as for cost-effectively managing the local network through proactive cyclical maintenance/rehabilitation and scheduling. Under this project, the City has incorporated the update of its unique Pavement Management – GIS MyRoads® PMP web-portal and GIS layers that assist the City in spatially analyzing pavement conditions and economic needs for a given pavement segment or citywide.
The South El Monte PMP has been developed to assist City personnel by providing current data on the City street networks and to develop cost-effective maintenance / rehabilitation strategies to maintain a desirable level of pavement performance on a network scale; this optimizes the expenditure of limited fiscal resources. The PMP efforts in 2023 consisted of analyzing the City’s previous PMP dataset for quality and usability. City staff also provided key information pertaining to the ongoing maintenance/rehabilitation efforts that have occurred throughout the City since 2018. In doing this, we were tasked to generate an updated Capital Improvement Program report that identified deficiencies and recommendations in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City.
For the 2023 project, our staff surveyed all arterial and collector routes to assist the City in complying with Los Angeles County MTA (METRO) PMP requirements as well as surveyed all local streets sections and analyzed historical maintenance / rehabilitation operations.
Specifically, the program provides administrators and maintenance personnel with:
• The present condition status of the pavement network (arterial, collector, and local streets), as a whole and of any grouping or individual component within the City; • A ranked list of all streets, or segments of streets, by condition within the network; • Rehabilitation/maintenance needs of qualifying street segments by year; • An optimized priority maintenance and rehabilitation program based on cost/benefit analysis and various levels of funding;
City of South El Monte Page 2
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
• Optimum annual budget levels for pavement maintenance for the current and the following five (5) years;
• Prediction of the future performance of the City’s pavement network and each individual street section; and
• Pavement network and conditional data presented in ArcGIS that is compatible with City’s existing GIS Enterprise
Pavement is a dynamic structure where deterioration is constantly occurring; thus the pavement management system needs to be updated on a regular basis to reflect these changes in pavement conditions, pavement maintenance histories, and maintenance strategies based upon budgetary constraints. In our approach to develop the City’s forecasted maintenance recommendations we worked with South El Monte staff in identifying unit costs for all maintenance practices used on an annual basis.
Currently, based upon the City’s maintenance practices and their associated unit costs, the total replacement value of the pavement network is $68,800,000 This value clearly indicates that the City’s pavement network is the most valuable and essential asset to South El Monte. The City’s use of slurry seal, ARHM Overlay and R&R practices are typically applied at a five year, ten year and 25 year frequency respectively. These frequencies are typical but the City may see increases in deterioration rates due to environmental, load and high average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. For example, high ADT volumes along one of South El Monte’s arterial streets will increase deterioration rates for a previously applied AC Overlay compared to a small local street. These deterioration rates are monitored through frequent inspections and functional class deterioration analysis within the City’s PMP database.
This report reflects our findings and recommendations for the PMP and the current state of the City’s pavement network. Furthermore, we have recommended detailed funding and maintenance strategies for the arterial/collector and residential networks for next five (5) years.
CITY’S PAVEMENT NETWORK
Within the South El Monte Arterial/Collector
pavement network consists of
approximately 15.1 section miles of streets,
2,849,035 SF of AC/PCC pavement that is
made up of 85 pavement sections. The Local
network consists of approx. 28.7 section
miles of streets, 5,282,296 SF of pavement
which includes 235 pavement sections.
Combined, the entire network consists of
43.8 section miles of streets, 8,131,331 SF
and 320 total pavement sections.
The City’s pavement network is broken down into manageable groups that have similar characteristics, such as pavement rank, surface type and logical segmentation. Pavement segments are identified by their branch and section numbers. Pavement “branches” that have a common usage, such as Garvey Avenue, defines a “branch” within MicroPAVER. Pavement “sections” are pavement segments within the defined branch that have consistent pavement rankings, construction/maintenance histories Figure 1
City of South El Monte Page 3
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
and use. Representative inspection samples are then selected and visually surveyed to locate distress data. This data is used to calculate the pavement sections Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which includes distress type, extent of the distress and its severity.
The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (a new pavement section or recently overlaid or reconstructed) to 0 for a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. Weighted average PCI of a given area/zone equals the pavement sections PCI multiplied by its own area then divided by the total square footage of the given area/zone. Table 1 summarizes the section conditions found within the City of South El Monte pavement network by rank. • The weighted avg. PCI for the City of South El Monte ARTERIAL / COLLECTOR network is 64.7 • The weighted avg. PCI for the City of South El Monte LOCAL network is 61.9 The weighted PCI value associated with the Arterial and Local routes shown through our survey analysis is timely in that it demonstrates the results of proactive pavement management. Furthermore, it is showing that a moderate amount of preventative, slurry seal, and overlay work will be needed over the next several years to sustain the level of condition (PCI) at a “preventative maintenance” level. The City is proactively scheduling and funding its PMP to reach a citywide weighted PCI of 66 within the next five years.
Table 1 – Past and Present PCI Results and Comparisons
Figure 2 – Historical PCI Findings (FY 2018-2023)
City of South El Monte Page 4
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
CURRENT CITYWIDE CONDITIONS (ARTERIALS-COLLECTORS AND LOCALS) The overall condition of the City’s pavement network is “Fair” with a weighted average PCI of 63.0 based on the surface area of each segment (this is a 2.0 PCI increase or a 3% increase compared to 2018 results).
The distribution of the City’s overall pavement network is shown in Section III of this report (Condition Distribution).
Table 2 – Condition Distribution by Section Mileage for All Streets For comparison, Bucknam performed
pavement management studies for
several other Los Angeles County
agencies and have included their
weighted PCI values (right).
As shown above, a large majority of
segments are evenly distributed
through all five condition categories
(Very Good to Very Poor). For a network in “preventive” condition status you would typically see Very Good to Good section percentage totals at the 55% to 60% range; South El Monte’s network currently shows 32% of its sections within these PCI ranges. These findings indicate that the proper funding of the network needs to improve over the next five years; this will allow Public Works managers/staff to proactively establish preventative and rehabilitation schedules that will generate further high-value ROI for the City. At a minimum, to sustain this asset, continued amounts of overlay rehabilitation and slurry seal maintenance needs to be budgeted for and performed across all areas of the pavement network.
As shown in Table 2, over 68% of the City’s entire network falls within the fair, poor and very poor condition categories based on the PCI findings, highlighting the need for continued funding and implementation of proactive slurry seal & overlay projects. More overlay rehabilitation activity will increase the City’s overall weighted PCI while reducing deferred maintenance costs in future fiscal years. Overlay projects applied to appropriate, qualifying segments is necessary to sustain the City’s network in a preventative condition status as described above. A network-wide preventative condition status is typically a network with a weighted average PCI over 75.
City of South El Monte Page 5
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
Regarding the Local network, detailed inspection analysis shows that 25% (7.1 miles) of the local pavement network requires slurry seal maintenance activity while 52% (14.9 miles) requires overlay rehabilitation or full reconstruction.
With the major amount of Local sections needing rehabilitation the City should proactively appropriate the necessary amount of annual overlay funding to improve the network to a higher condition level. The Local network has shown minor improvement over five years however it will continue to be a major contributor to the high amount of deferred rehabilitation cost burdens unless appropriate pavement funding is applied.
In regard to the Arterial / Collector network, detailed inspection analysis showsthat 36% (5.4 miles) of the local pavement network requires slurry seal maintenance activity while 56% (8.5 miles) requires overlay rehabilitation or full reconstruction over the past five years the overall PCI has decrease by 5%. This is due to the considerable minimal amount of arterial CIP overlay projects that have been applied to the network since 2018. With the overall PCI in the mid-60’s, proactive planning and application of scheduled overlay projects needs to be established; this will improve the overall conditions while freeing up additional funding for deferred projects. With the supplement of SB1/RMRA/Measure M/Measure R monies coming to the City this fiscal year additional projects can be schedule and expedited over the next three years.
Through our assessment of the City’s annual pavement management budget allocations (FY 2023-2028) the lack or major reduction of necessary CIP funds will cause the City’s citywide weighted PCI to decrease over the next five years if additional funding is not appropriated.
Furthermore, as large overlay and rehabilitation projects are considered for funding, the City should also consider using sub-grade R - Values, structural design, distress severities and extents as parameters for determining whether a pavement section that lies within the Poor to Very Poor condition range should be overlaid or reconstructed. The City has available and accessible Google .kmz Coring Data that will serve as an essential tool when assessing AC and Base thicknesses during grind and overlay planning.
PCI conditions reflect “surface” conditions; additional sub-surface data such as coring data, R-Values and ground penetrating radar (GPR) will provide City to with a better approach to the maintenance that should be applied.
Our 2023 findings reflect the need to proactively manage the PMP network over the past several years.
This is evident in the minor overall increase in citywide weighted PCI since 2018 and high amounts of deferred maintenance/rehabilitation projects. As the City strives to implement a more preventative state of M&R, cost efficient Arterial/Local rehabilitation and proactive use of available SB1/Measure M/Measure R/Proposition C overlay funding should remain the focus.
City of South El Monte Page 6
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
Figure 3 – PCI Distribution by Section Mileage for All Streets
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
Based on the results of the condition survey and input from the City, pavement maintenance/rehabilitation strategies were developed. From the onset, the City and Bucknam staff identified a distribution of City maintenance funds that would be applied to the network over the next five years. This was based upon the desire to prevent the decrease in street conditions and not allow an increase in the maintenance backlog funds over the five-year program.
Through our assessment and discussions with the City we were requested to identify what level of funding would be required to maintain the current PCI as well as identify the level of funding needed to increase the PCI to 66. With this approach, Bucknam has recommended a “minimal level of service” which creates a major dividing line in determining between preventive maintenance and major pavement rehabilitation.
Generally within pavement management programs, a PCI range between 55 to 70 determines the threshold of when preventive or major overlay rehabilitation is activated. Based on the City’s weighted average PCI, condition distribution, maintenance practices, our team has identified a PCI of “65” as the minimum level of service. This means, in most cases, that pavement sections with a PCI greater than 65 will typically be recommended for preventive maintenance (i.e. slurry seal). This recommendation is indicated in Table 6, Section II.
Bucknam developed two multi-year Capital Improvement Programs for the City based on the pavement records, yearly capital expenditures, available funding and the most recent 2023 inspections. These recommendations and results are shown in Section II of this report where, for example, we have demonstrated what level of funding is necessary to improve the current weighted condition level of 63 to a level of 66 by FY 2028.
City of South El Monte Page 7
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
As shown above in Figure 3, 36% of the City’s streets are in Good to Fair condition. These sections will be targeted for “preventive” maintenance within our Capital Improvement Program (CIP) recommendations.
The reasoning in doing this is to extend the life cycles of those “good” pavement sections which accrues capital saving to aggressively rehabilitate those pavement sections that are below the “minimal level of service”.
In order to achieve the most effective and optimum program for the City, certain strategies have been selected and/or analyzed. Below is a listing of the maintenance activities utilized in strategy development.
Each activity is representative of the types of work that have been programmed as part of the long-term maintenance requirements of the City’s street network.
General Repairs-Stop Gap (Localized Maintenance*); PCI Range – 20 to 95 For this maintenance type, small localized surface treatments are utilized as “holding action” solutions (stop gaps) to delay the need for pavement structural strengthening. They typically include activities such as crack sealing, AC deep patching, AC skin patching, PCC slab replacement, grinding and leveling.
Microsurfacing - (Global Maintenance*); PCI Range – 60 to 85 Microsurfacing is similar to slurry seal. It consists of the application of a mixture of water, asphalt emulsion, aggregate (very small crushed rock), and chemical additives to an existing asphalt concrete pavement surface. Polymer is commonly added to the asphalt emulsion to provide better mixture properties. The major difference between slurry seal and microsurfacing is in how they “break” or harden. Slurry relies on evaporation of the water in the asphalt emulsion. The asphalt emulsion used in microsurfacing contains chemical additives which allow it to break without relying on the sun or heat for evaporation to occur. Thus, microsurfacing is an application that hardens quicker than slurry seals and can be used when conditions would not allow slurry seal to be successfully placed. Streets that have a lot of shade and streets that have a lot of traffic are good candidates for microsurfacing (source - LA County of Public Works).
Slurry Seals (Global Maintenance*); PCI Range – 60 to 85 Surface treatments applied to pavements with minimal surface distress to provide new wearing surfaces and extend pavement life. Generally consists of a mixture of conventional or latex-modified emulsified asphalt, well-graded fine aggregate, mineral filler and water placed over an existing AC surface; Slurry seal application life-cycles are averaging 4 to 5 years. Type II Slurry is recommended for Local streets.
Cape Seals (Global Maintenance*); PCI Range – 40 to 65
This is an application of a single layer of asphalt binder to a road surface immediately followed by a single layer of cover aggregate (chips). The single layer chip seal is then followed with a slurry seal application; Conventional cape seal application life-cycles are averaging 6 to 7 years. For sections that have lower PCI’s in this range, leveling courses should be considered. City is currently considering this application as an alternative cost-saving tool. Currently not used by the City.
City of South El Monte Page 8
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
Overlays (Major Rehabilitation*); PCI Range – 20 to 65
AC Overlay – Placement of a layer of hot-mixed asphalt concrete over the existing pavement surface (may include pavement fabric). Grinding (milling) is performed prior to the overlay to reduce the total height of asphalt and assure alignment with existing gutter lines. This also includes “dig-outs” and crack sealing prior to the application of an overlay. This treatment provides a new wearing surface and increased structural strength to the pavement section. A conventional overlay should be designed for a ten-year life.
Asphalt Rubber Hot-Mix Overlay - The ASTM definition is: Asphalt-Rubber is a blend of asphalt cement, reclaimed tire rubber and certain additives in which the rubber component is at least 15% by weight of the total blend and has reacted in the hot asphalt cement sufficiently to cause swelling of the rubber particles. Specifically, using crumb rubber modified binders in pavement application benefit local agencies in that cities find:
• Pavement resists cracking by being more flexible;
• Cost savings come from a longer life cycle (from Bucknam’s experience typically 20% longer), decreased maintenance and the use of less material
• Improvement in skid resistance;
• Decreased noise; and
• It provides long-lasting color contrast for marking and striping • Life cycles are averaging 8 to 12 years
Reconstruction (Major Rehabilitation*); PCI Range – 0 to 20 Reconstruction of an existing pavement section includes demolition and removal of the asphalt to a prescribed depth, grading, sub-base compaction, application of a binder/surface course followed by the placement of a conventional flexible pavement section using a structural AC Hot Mix, ARHM or a full depth asphalt. Each classification of road has a typical design cross-section based on anticipated traffic loading. Reconstruction resets a roadway section PCI to 100 and restarts the life-cycle deterioration curve of the section.
*Localized, Global and Major maintenance activities are default terms used within the MicroPAVER pavement software. Specific pavement repair applications are placed within each maintenance activity in order to develop multi-year maintenance forecast recommendations.
City of South El Monte Page 9
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
ANNUAL BUDGET PROJECTIONS
The budgeting process was approached with the following in mind; generate two (2) unique work programs for the next five (5) years based upon actual road pavement conditions in order to:
1. Identify the required annual citywide budget to “increase PCI” within five years;
2. Identify the required annual citywide budget to “maintain current PCI” within five years; and Table 3 – Five-Year Projection Demonstrating Annual Budget to Increase PCI to 66 Table 4 – Five-Year Projection Demonstrating Annual Budget to Maintain PCI of 63 Our findings within Table 3 demonstrate the continued ROI that will result if proper annual funding is applied. By applying approximately $1,390,000/yr ($7,000,000 over five years); the City will start to see positive results with overall PCI, sustainment in deferred preventative maintenance and overlay rehabilitation.
Additional detail and breakdown of budget projections are demonstrated in Section IV of this report.
All work program budgets generated are presented in terms of current 2023 dollars. All repair activities were based on distresses observed at the time of the field survey. These are recommendations and are to be used as “the best case scenario” for improving the City of South El Monte street network.
City of South El Monte Page 10
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
QUALITY CONTROL EFFORTS
Quality control efforts begin at the notice-to-proceed; this involved a full assessment of the previous PMP spreadsheet as well as available GIS data associated with the City of South El Monte street network. The PMP data provided was then converted into a new MicroPAVER database for the City to manage their street network moving forward.
As indicated in our scope of work, Bucknam performed numerous quality control checks in the field during survey efforts. Field check efforts were performed at the end of each week of survey; 10% of the pavement inspection set was resurveyed by a second team to ensure the quantities and distress types were collected properly (approx. 5 miles).
During our assessment of the previous PMP data, it came to our attention that there were some significant issues with the previous dataset. These issues included inaccurate segmentation, length, width, and true area values, and inspections that did not follow ASTM D6433 standards. Bucknam staff individually reviewed every section across the network to ensure all sections contain similar pavement type, age, and condition. Additionally, length, width, and true area values were corrected for all sections which enhances the accuracy of our budgetary modeling and cost estimations. In total, the City’s section miles increased by 5.9 miles; The total true area across the network decreased by 766,033 SF; and the total number of pavement sections decreased from 533 to 318.
Through our internal quality control efforts, we also found multiple sections that were missing from the previous database. All new sections were added to the PMP database and included in our survey efforts.
We believe that all public street sections have been identified, inventoried, and surveyed under this project.
City of South El Monte Page 11
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Arterials/Collectors
The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Arterial/Collector street network is currently in “Fair” condition (PCI = 64.7). To improve this condition, it is essential that preventive maintenance and overlay rehabilitation activities are funded at the levels identified in Table 3 to increase the network weighted average PCI value to within the “Good” condition category.
Our arterial/collector findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below:
• The Arterial/Collector network has a weighted PCI of 64.7; • Currently, 56% of the arterial/collector network (approx. 8.5 miles) qualify for overlay/reconstruction maintenance; 36% (approx. 5.4 miles) qualify for slurry seal maintenance; • At a minimum, Arterial/Collector maintenance projects should focus on achieving and maintaining the a PCI of 65+ within the next five years;
• Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify arterial/collector overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within MicroPAVER;
• Maintain arterial/collector revenues at the levels shown within the Section IV Forecasted Maintenance Report for a minimum of five years to generate the results identified within this report;
• Reassess/re-evaluate the arterial/collector rehabilitation budget programs every two years to improve on CIP forecasts for 2023-24 and beyond to ensure the results shown in Table 3 and 4; • Perform pavement inspections on the arterial/collector network every three years to build a solid planning model within MicroPAVER/MyRoads® to track PCI deterioration; • Demonstrated budget shown in Table 3 is ample to improve upon the Arterial/Collector weighted PCI of 64.7 through five years, however, the citywide deferred backlog increases from a level of $15.2 million to $17.5 million after five years; and
• Bucknam recommends that the City proactively budget overlay rehabilitation projects at the levels shown in Table 3 in order to improve upon the conditions found today as well as minimize the impact of a high increase deferred backlog across the City City of South El Monte Page 12
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section I
Locals
The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Local street network is currently in “Fair” condition (PCI = 61.9). To improve this condition, it is essential that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified in Table 3 to increase the network weighted average PCI value in the “Fair” category.
Our Local findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below:
• The Local network has a weighted PCI of 61.9;
• Currently, 52% of the Local network (approx. 14.9 miles) qualify for overlay/reconstruction maintenance; 25% (approx. 7.1 miles) qualify for slurry seal maintenance; • At a minimum, Local maintenance projects should focus on achieving and maintaining a weighted PCI above a level of 65+ within the next five years;
• Current Local Forecast Maintenance & Rehabilitation (FMR) recommendations should be followed as shown in Section IV reporting;
• Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify Local overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within MicroPAVER;
• Increase Local revenues at the levels shown within the Section IV Forecasted Maintenance Report for a minimum of five years to generate the results identified within this report; • Reassess/re-evaluate the Local rehabilitation budget programs every two years to improve on budget forecasts for 2023-24 and beyond to ensure the results shown in Table 3 or 4; • Perform pavement inspections on the Local network every three years to build a solid planning model within MicroPAVER/MyRoads® to track PCI deterioration; and • Demonstrated budget shown in Table 3 is ample enough to improve the Local weighted PCI; proactive overlay funding needs to be implemented to see these results. however, the citywide deferred backlog increases from a level of $15.2 million to $17.5 million after five years • Bucknam recommends that the City proactively budget overlay rehabilitations at the levels shown in Table 3 in order to improve upon the conditions found today as well as minimize the impact of a high increase deferred backlog across the City
City of South El Monte Page 1
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
SECTION II
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. (Bucknam) performed the following services in accordance with the scope of services that was contracted with the City of South El Monte. As a quick overview, the following tasks were performed to complete the work over the past several months:
2023 Pavement Management Work Efforts:
Task 1: Project Kickoff-Data Management
Task 2: Update of Maintenance Activities
Task 3: Pavement Condition Survey (approx. 43.9 miles)
Task 4: Budgetary Analysis and Capital Improvement Reports Task 5: Executive Summary and Final CIP Reports
Task 6: Mapping of the Pavement Network
Pavement Management Program Update 2023
As a part of the 2023 update of the pavement management program, a major element of work was to complete a comprehensive assessment of the existing street network and PMS database within the City.
This included assessing the City’s existing 2018 MicroPAVER dataset, GIS, street naming conventions and work history information. From there, Bucknam worked with the City to confirm public and private street listings which set the foundation for accurate CIP reporting. All data was then updated into the City’s MicroPAVER database.
Work history information was provided by the City in the form of completed bid documents, institutional knowledge, and previous dataset and Excel documents. This information was entered into the proper pavement segments that match the limits of those projects. From there, CIP pavement recommendations were performed (discussed and demonstrated below) where the pavement maintenance information the City provided (PMS material practices, unit costs, and capital budgets) were used to generate recommendations through the MicroPAVER system.
Table 6 demonstrates PCI ranges utilized for PCI calculations and reporting. Once a pavement inspection is complete, a PCI is calculated for each pavement section. Each PCI calculated falls within a defined PCI range category (Very Good, Poor, etc.). Furthermore, a weighted PCI was calculated for each functional class within the network (arterials and locals).
The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (a new pavement section or recently overlaid or reconstructed) to 0 for a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. Weighted average PCI of a given area/zone equals the pavement sections PCI multiplied by its own area then divided by the total square footage of the given area/zone. This information can also be represented through MicroPAVER to show how much square footage or percentage of area falls within a PCI range category.
City of South El Monte Page 2
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
Table 5 – Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Ranges
These condition ranges are defined by the Army Corps of Engineers and defaulted within the MicroPAVER software. The summary of all roads condition data and their representative PCI's can be seen in the Pavement Condition Report in Section III.
STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT TABLE
The City was requested to provide a pavement maintenance list that demonstrated what pavement applications were currently being used and to provide their associated unit costs; from there a Maintenance Strategy Table was defined within the system that provided recommended actions to the specific repair needs of a street or a grouping of streets.
Strategy Assignment Table
Table 6 – Maintenance Strategy Assignments
The Strategy Assignments List, shown in Table 6, was developed to identify the most critical segments in each of the work programs (Arterial, Collector and Local). Segment priorities were established by determining the range of PCI's requiring first attention based on the relative value of each segment’s PCI, thus maximizing the annual maintenance budget. Also, distress quantity, area extent, type and severity were critical elements in the decision process for recommending maintenance. The assignment table is used as a guide within MicroPAVER to recommend maintenance, however, further assessment by City staff and/or outside parties can override maintenance recommendations.
City of South El Monte Page 3
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
This can be done by reviewing and assessing distress extents and their weighted percentages.
Once the strategy assignments were set within the system, budgets and work assignments were generated for each work program on an annual basis. Using pavement deterioration curves for each type of pavement surface and class of road, both current year and future years work requirements for each pavement segment within the City were determined. In forecasting the maintenance requirements in future years, the current PCI value is reduced annually for each pavement segment based on the MicroPAVER deterioration curves within the City’s database.
Likewise, maintenance activities performed in a given year increase the PCI value as they are applied to the segment. The overall program is dynamic in that each strategy consists of a cyclic series of actions that simulates the pavement anticipated life cycle.
Strategy Assignment Notes
1. Unit costs from the City’s most recent construction bids were used as well as benchmarked values from neighboring LA County cities;
2. 25% contingency costs were applied to pavement material costs; additional soft costs that were not included were:
a. Right-of-way improvements
b. Curb & gutter improvements
c. ADA ramp improvement
d. Utility improvement
e. Tree removals
3. Bucknam applied a 5% inflation rate on the annual budget within forecast maintenance & rehabilitation projections (Section IV)
Figure 4 – Sample Pavement Life Cycle
City of South El Monte Page 4
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
MULTI-YEAR ANNUAL WORK PROGRAM PROJECTIONS
The goal of these projections is to assist City policy makers in utilizing the recommendations of the MicroPAVER system. By using the City of South El Monte’s current budgets and maintenance practices the system will develop “section unique” improvements and strategies. Qualifying segments will be tied to a specific fiscal year. As shown in the following pages, we have assessed the budgets that have been projected to meet the maintenance and rehabilitations needed to maximize the City’s return on investment. The budget forecasting goal for the City network focused on:
Establishing a proactive multi-year Maintenance & Rehabilitation Program; Developing a preventive maintenance program; and
Selecting the most cost-effective repairs based on City strategies INCREASE PCI BUDGET – A recommended budget was generated for the City to demonstrate the necessary funding that is required to increase the current weighted PCI level of 63 to 66 within five years.
MAINTAIN PCI BUDGET – The Maintain PCI budget was generated for the City to demonstrate what level of annual funding is required to sustain the overall weighted PCI of 63 for the next five years. *All multi-year budget projections include a 5% inflation rate for the term of the budget forecast.
City of South El Monte Page 5
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
ARTERIAL-COLLECTOR / LOCAL
BUDGET PROJECTIONS
City of South El Monte Page 6
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
INCREASE PCI TO 66 PROGRAM (FIVE YEAR MODEL)
With the City striving to show proactive rehabilitation across all qualifying pavements, a $7 Million/5-Yr budget program was applied to current conditions to show a potential higher return on investment. We used the “Maintain PCI Budget” PMP model (shown on page 7) as a basis for our modeling. Building upon the results of the previous reporting model we increased the amount of funding available for overlay/rehabilitation efforts. The “Increase PCI” program incorporates pavement sections that have a functional class of Arterial (A, C) and Local (E).
Table 7 – Necessary Funding to Increase PCI to 66
Referring to Table 7, it is noted that the weighted PCI increases proactively through the five-year term (63.0 to 66.5). Additionally, the annual deferred maintenance total stay relatively consistent by only increasing from $15.2 million to $17.5 million at the end of the five-years. If the City utilizes an average annual budget of $1,390,000/yr for slurry, overlay, and reconstruction projects as shown above, the City will be able to “increase” the current conditions and will continue to see a sustaining of deferred maintenance by fiscal year 2028. We recommend that a focus be placed on the Local network improvements due to the fact that the weighted PCI is now in the low 60’s. We still recommend consistent Arterial/Collector based approach to maintenance within this term as well.
Figure 5 – Five Year Projection; Increase PCI to 66 Budget City of South El Monte Page 7
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
MAINTAIN PCI PROGRAM (FIVE YEAR MODEL)
With the City striving to show proactive maintenance/rehabilitation across all City pavements, a budget program was generated to show the greatest return on investment through the application of slurry seal, grind/overlay and alternative overlay rehabilitations. Our goal under this model is to maintain the current 2023 weighted PCI of 63.0 after a five-year program. This model will demonstrate the necessary funding to achieve this goal.
We used the City’s current unit costs within our modeling as a cornerstone within the recommended program. Assessing all work history, current PCI and relevant unit costs for construction a realistic and achievable annual budget was achieved. The Maintain Program incorporates pavement sections that have a functional class of Arterial (A, C) and Local (E).
Table 8 – Necessary Funding to Maintain PCI of 63
Referring to Table 8, it is noted that the weighted PCI consistently remains at a PCI of 63 pace throughout the five-year projection. Furthermore, the resulting deferred maintenance backlog shows that it increases from $15.4 million to $19.3 million after the five years program which indicates that an annual $800k budget is not ample enough to chip away at the deferred maintenance on the network. If the City were to reduce their annual funding to a level of $500k/yr major overlay projects would continue to be delayed thus increasing the overall deferred maintenance to a level of $23.5 million after five years.
We recommend that a stronger focus be placed on the Local network improvements within the first three years due to the fact that the network has a worse weighted PCI than the Arterials/Collector. We still recommend comprehensive maintenance to the Arterial/Collector network through localized patching, slurry seal and through the use of SB1/Measure M/Measure R funds.
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE
Delaying repairs on streets where pavement condition indicates a need creates deferred maintenance. Deferred maintenance includes pavement maintenance / rehabilitation that is needed across the entire network, but cannot be performed due to the lack of available funding and is pushed to the next budget cycle. The actual repairs that are being deferred are often referred to as a “backlog”. As maintenance is deferred, the opportunity to apply life extending preventive pavement applications is lost and the ultimate cost of rehabilitation multiples.
City of South El Monte Page 8
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
Figure 6 – Five-Year Projection; Maintain PCI of 63 Budget As mentioned above, a continued local slurry/overlay M&R “zone” strategy should be utilized for several reasons. With the City applying continued local maintenance efforts, four beneficial impacts occur:
1) Planned / Maintenance areas are addressed every five years which creates a dedicated project schedule for City staff and constituent inquiries; 2) Deferred overlay rehabilitation can be addressed in a more effective manner due to accrued revenues
3) A preventative maintenance strategy is more cost-effective in a long-term PMP rather than implementing a maintenance approach that addresses only the “worst-first” streets. 4) All maintenance alternatives are available due to the increased funding and focused maintenance within one zone per year.
On the negative side, if low weighted PCI values occur within a given zone, all streets within that zone may not be able to be addressed with maintenance when that zone is scheduled for maintenance. The deferred maintenance will have to be scheduled for future years or simply will have to wait until the zone cycle repeats.
Additionally, it is recommended that the City continue to monitor the potential application of Cape Seal and/or High Density Mineral Bond (HDMB) as an asphalt application alternatives for the specific local sections. Specific sections are now qualifying for maintenance that warrants a stronger application rather than a typical slurry seal. With a five year cycle in motion, it is essential to address localsections that have PCI’s less than 65 with the proper rehabilitation since crews will not be back within that area for five to six years.
City of South El Monte Page 9
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORTS
In addition to the annual budget scenario, this report contains a comprehensive and complementary assemblage of pavement management reports ranging from summary reports to annual maintenance and rehabilitation schedules (Forecast Maintenance & Rehabilitation (FMR) Report, Section IV). Collectively as well as individually, the reports represent reasonable projections of pavement maintenance needs and performance based on visual condition assessments, unit cost estimates, and pavement deterioration models.
It is important to note that pavement segment dimensions and surface area recorded during 1999-2018, and 2023 inspections, along with the action and repair costs, as presented within the reports are accurate within tolerable limits. This is noteworthy due to the "implied" accuracy of reporting length and width to the nearest foot, surface area to the nearest square foot, and action and repair unit costs and project estimates to the nearest penny and dollar, respectively.
NEXT STEPS
As with any infrastructure management software program, time investments need to be made by key Public Works staff to maintain the integrity of the data as well as the accuracy. Bucknam can perform training sessions in the use of the MicroPAVER tools and demonstrate how to generate standard commonsense reports to assist City staff in developing yearly budgets, project level analysis, and CIP projections.
This will be key to future management of the pavement program and reporting. City personnel need to maintain their commitment to the preventive maintenance system, while working toward reducing the City's present backlog of rehabilitation projects.
In order to ensure that report outputs are accurate and credible, it is essential that the integrity of all data files be maintained. This will require performing all necessary updates when changes are made to scheduling scenarios, unit cost information, historical data, etc. In addition, the entire pavement network will have to be re-inventoried at regular intervals. This typically includes surveying arterial and collectors every two years and locals every three.
This will not only allow work to be scheduled based on the most current condition data available, but will provide City personnel with a means to monitor actual rates of pavement deterioration so appropriate modifications can be made to the system curves. To be compliant with the METRO requirements, the City must generate a triennial Pavement Management report indicating condition ratings, inspection dates and forecasted maintenance/rehabilitation recommendations.
Bucknam will be supporting the City with staff level support to assist in the continuous updates with the MicroPAVER/MyRoads® system. This will include work history updates, generating reports from the system, unit cost updates, and future inspections.
City of South El Monte Page 10
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
CONDITION DISTRIBUTION REPORT
This report depicts the distribution of the pavement condition throughout the street network by area.
The condition scheme ranges from “Very Good” to “Very Poor”; with a “Very Good” condition corresponding to a pavement at the beginning of its life cycle, and a “Very Poor” condition representing a badly deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life.
The table below shows the general description for each pavement condition:
Condition Description – PCI Range - Description
2023 City of South El Monte weighted average PCI is 63.0 (Fair).
City of South El Monte Page 11
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
CALCULATION OF PCI
In order to calculate a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) value within MicroPAVER, specific street section data needs to be inputted into MicroPAVER to define the survey limits, asphalt types, pavement age and metrics. Pavement “sections” are pavement segments within the defined branch that have consistent pavement street classifications, construction/maintenance histories and use. Representative inspection samples are then selected and visually surveyed to locate distress data. This data is used to calculate the pavement sections Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which includes distress type, extent of the distress and its severity.
The PCI is a condition rating that ranges from 100 (pavement section that is in perfect condition) to 0 for a section that has structurally failed and deteriorated dramatically. The PCI is calculated from three major data entries from our inspectors:
1. Distress Type (one of 20 AC or 19 PCC types); these include alligator cracking, bleeding, block cracking, corrugations, depressions, long/trans cracking, patch/utility cut, potholes, rutting, weathering, raveling, etc.
2. Distress Quantity (the square footage, length or count of a specific distress)
3. Distress Severity (the level of severity determined for each distress found; low, medium or high)
Figure 7 – PCI Calculation Worksheet
City of South El Monte Page 12
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
South El Monte MyRoads® Web-Portal – Bucknam’s MyRoads® is a great match for the South El Monte’s PMP today and the future. MyRoads® brings your PMP data to life within a dynamic dashboard! Bucknam now provides all our PMP clients with a unique and agency driven “MyRoads®” web-portal that provides instantaneous access to your pavement management database. This “dashboard” allows users to toggle through individual sections via GIS mapping selections, zone queries, rank selection, PCI ranges, etc. to review all section metrics, latest/previous inspections, work histories generate filtered PCI reports and identify potential maintenance / rehabilitation costs based upon your unique needs.
Bucknam has shown below the current South El Monte MyRoads® account actively working! This tool will be accessed by City staff simply through a Username/Password methodology. As changes are made to the South El Monte PMP database the MyRoads® dataset is changed to reflect work history edits, PCI inspections and section changes.
In summary, MyRoads® allows the user perform the following dynamic functions:
• Query specific pavement segment(s) to view current/historic PCI, work history inspection; • Filter for pavement sections within a defined zone, PCI range and/or functional class; • Select a pavement section or grouping
of section through the on-board GIS
tool;
• Enter slurry, overlay & reconstruction
unit costs to determine preliminary
cost of maintenance and resulting
citywide PCI
o Display critical street / sidewalk
/ ROW assets along pavement
section(s) that are critical to
Engineering Bid development
and solicitation (ADA ramps,
utilities, manholes, trees, etc.
• Displays all final GIS project maps (PCI,
work history, 5-yr forecasted
maintenance, etc.)
• Bucknam will train South El Monte’s
staff on the simply use of the MyRoads®
dashboard.
Figure 8 – South El Monte MyRoads® PMP Web-Portal
City of South El Monte Page 13
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
Figure 9 – Arterial/Collector Condition Distribution
Figure 10 – Local Condition Distribution
City of South El Monte Page 14
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
SAMPLE DISTRESS PHOTOS – RECOMMENDED TREATMENT (FIGURE 11) Bucknam Infrastructure Group
1. Alligator Cracking
Cracks that form a chicken wire or
alligator scale like pattern.
Low Severity: Thin parallel
longitudinal cracks that may come
together at certain points, but full
alligator pattern is not present yet.
Medium Severity: Further
development of cracks into alligator
pattern. Cracks are starting to spall.
High Severity: Alligator pattern is
heavily developed, and cracks are
spalled to the point where individual
pieces may become separated.
Typical Recommendation: Low severity, R&R – Patching, crack sealing; high severity R&R-overlay
2. Bleeding
Bleeding occurs when incorrectly
mixed asphalt is applied and in hot
weather the asphalt or tar rises to the
surface.
Severity is determined by the amount
of asphalt/tar present.
Typical Recommendation: Low
severity, apply coarse sand; high
severity, grind or heat planer excess,
resurfacing may be necessary
City of South El Monte Page 15
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
3. Block Cracking
Longitudinal and transverse cracks
that intersect to form smaller than
10x10 ft blocks. Creates uniform
blocks with straight edges.
Low Severity: Cracking is less than
3/8 inches.
Medium Severity: Cracking
between 3/8 and 3 inches.
High Severity: Cracking is over 3
inches.
Typical Recommendation: Low
severity, crack sealing; high severity, R&R-overlay
4. Bumps and Sags
Small, localized, and linear upward
or downward displacements of
pavement, which can be caused by
a variety of factors.
Severity is determined by the
extent to which ride quality is
diminished.
Typical Recommendation: R&R -
Patching
City of South El Monte Page 16
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
5. Corrugation
Closely spaced Bumps and or Sags that
form a washboard effect in the
pavement.
Severity is determined by the extent to
which ride quality is diminished.
Typical Recommendation: Low severity,
R&R – Patching; high severity, R&Roverlay
6. Depression
Localized area of pavement with a lower
elevation than the surrounding
pavement.
Low Severity: depth of ½ to 1 inch.
Medium Severity: depth of 1 to 2
Inches.
High Severity: depth greater than 2
inches.
Typical Recommendation: R&R - Patching
City of South El Monte Page 17
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
7. Edge Cracking
Cracks that are parallel to the
edge of the pavement that may
cause a break up of pavement.
Low Severity: Low or Medium
cracking with no breakup.
Medium Severity: Medium
cracking with some breakup.
High Severity: Considerable
breakup of pavement.
Typical Recommendation: R&R -
Patching
8. Joint Reflective Cracking
Cracking that is reflected through
AC pavement when it is overlaid
on top of PCC pavement.
Low Severity: Cracking is less than
3/8 inches.
Medium Severity: Cracking
between 3/8 and 3 inches.
High Severity: Cracking is over 3
inches.
Typical Recommendation: R&R -
Overlay
City of South El Monte Page 18
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
9. Lane / Shoulder Drop-off
Elevation change between
pavement and shoulder.
Low Severity: Difference in
elevation is between 1 and 2
inches.
Medium Severity: Difference in
elevation is between 2 and 4
inches.
High Severity: Difference in
elevation is over 4 inches.
Typical Recommendation: R&R –
Patching or edge grinding
10. Linear & Transverse Cracking
Cracks that are generally either parallel or
perpendicular to traffic.
Low Severity: Cracking is less than 3/8 inches.
Medium Severity: Cracking is between 3/8 and 3
inches.
High Severity: Cracking is over 3 inches.
Typical Recommendation: Low severity, crack
sealing; high severity, R&R - Overlay
City of South El Monte Page 19
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
11. Patching
Area of pavement that has been
replaced.
Severity is determined by the
quality of the patch and the
extent to which ride quality is
diminished.
Typical Recommendation: R&R –
structural / non-structural overlay
12. Polished Aggregate
Distress where traffic smooths
the pavement surface so friction
is diminished and cars can slide.
There are no Severity Levels for
this distress.
City of South El Monte Page 20
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
13. Pothole
Severity Measured using the following Matrix.
Typical Recommendation: low severity Pothole fill or R&R – Patching, high severity should be R&ROverlay City of South El Monte Page 21
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
14. RR Crossing
Pavement distresses caused by
railroad crossings.
Severity is determined by the extent to
which ride quality is diminished.
Typical Recommendation: R&R -
Patching
15. Rutting
Linear depressions along wheel
paths caused by traffic.
Low Severity: Depth is ¼ to ½
inches.
Medium Severity: Depth is ½ to
1 inch.
High Severity: is greater than 1
inch.
Typical Recommendation:
Pavement with deeper ruts
should be leveled and overlaid
City of South El Monte Page 22
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
16. Shoving
Displacement of pavement
creating a “wave” over a more
solid surface.
Severity is determined by the
extent to which ride quality is
diminished.
Typical Recommendation: R&R -
Patching
17. Slippage Cracking
Half-moon shaped cracks
where wheels cause pavement
to slide.
Low Severity: Average crack
width is less than 3/8 inch.
Medium Severity: Crack width
is between 3/8 and 3/2 inches.
High Severity: Crack width is
greater than 3/2 inches.
Typical Recommendation: R&R
- Patching
City of South El Monte Page 23
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
18. Swell
Upward Bulges creating “wave-like”
patterns.
Severity is determined by the extent to
which ride quality is diminished.
Typical Recommendation: Low severity,
R&R – Patching; high severity, R&Roverlay
19. Weathering
The wearing away of the asphalt binder.
Low Severity: Aggregate is starting to be
exposed.
Medium Severity: Aggregate is exposed
up to ¼ of its width.
High Severity: Aggregate is exposed to
greater than ¼ of its width.
Typical Recommendation: naturally
occurring, slurry seal
20. Raveling
The further weathering of asphalt so that
coarse aggregate is separating out of
pavement.
Medium Severity: Considerable loss of
aggregate.
High Severity: Almost complete removal
of coarse aggregate.
Typical Recommendation: Low severity,
R&R – Patching; high severity, R&Roverlay
City of South El Monte Page 24
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC)
1. Blowup
Buckling at cracks or joints where
there is not enough room for slab
expansion.
Severity is determined by the
extent to which ride quality is
diminished.
2. Corner Break
Crack close to corner of slab that
creates a corner piece.
Low Severity: Crack is less than ½
inches wide.
Medium Severity: Crack is
between ½ and 2 inches wide.
High Severity: Crack is wider than
2 inches.
City of South El Monte Page 25
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
3. Divided Slab
Slab that is broken up into four or
more pieces by cracks.
Severity is determined by the
following matrix.
4. Durability Cracking
Pattern of cracks parallel to joints
caused by freeze-thaw expansion of
large aggregate.
Low Severity: Durability cracking
covers less than 15 percent of slab.
Medium Severity: Durability cracking
covers more than 15 percent of the
slab.
High Severity: Durability cracking
covers more than 15 percent of slab
and most pieces have come out.
City of South El Monte Page 26
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
5. Faulting
Elevation Difference between
slabs.
Low Severity: Elevation difference
is between 1/8 and 3/8 inch.
Medium Severity: Elevation is
between 3/8 and ¾ inch.
High Severity: Elevation is greater
than ¾ inch.
6. Joint Seal Damage
Damage to sealant between joints
that allows soil, rock, or water
infiltration.
Low Severity: Joint sealant has only
minor damage.
Medium Severity: Joint sealant is in
fair condition. Water can infiltrate
and vegetation may be present.
High Severity: Joint sealant is in
poor condition. It may be missing
and rocks may be present.
City of South El Monte Page 27
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
7. Lane / Shoulder Drop-Off
The Elevation difference between
pavement and shoulder.
Low Severity: Elevation difference is
between 1 and 2 inches.
Medium Severity: Elevation
difference is between 2 and 4
inches.
High Severity: Elevation difference
is greater than 4 inches.
8. Linear Cracking
Cracks that divide slab into two or
three pieces.
Low Severity: Crack is less than ½
inch wide.
Medium Severity: Crack is between
½ and 2 inches wide.
High Severity: Crack is wider than 2
inches.
City of South El Monte Page 28
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
9. Large Patch
Patch that is larger than 5.5 sq ft.
Low Severity: Patch has little or no
deterioration.
Medium Severity: Patch is
moderately deteriorated.
High Severity: Patch is badly
deteriorated.
10. Small Patch
Patch that is smaller than 5.5 sq ft.
Low Severity: Patch has little or no
deterioration.
Medium Severity: Patch is
moderately deteriorated.
High Severity: Patch is badly
deteriorated.
City of South El Monte Page 29
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
11. Polished Aggregate
Distress where traffic smooths the
pavement surface so friction is
diminished and cars can slide.
There are no Severity Levels for this
distress.
12. Popouts
Small piece of pavement that breaks
loose from surface.
There are no Severity Levels for this
distress, however popouts must
cover 3 per sq. meter of the slab.
City of South El Monte Page 30
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section II
13. Pumping
Ejection of material from slab
foundation through joints or cracks
along with water.
There are no Severity Levels for this
distress.
14. Punchout
Localized area of a slab that is broken
into many pieces.
Severity is determined by the
following matrix.
City of South El Monte Page 1
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section III
SECTION III
CITYWIDE
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX REPORT
A. 2023 South El Monte PCI Map
B. Name Order (A to Z)
C. PCI Order (0-100)
City of South El Monte Page 2
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section III
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX REPORT
Listed alphabetically by street name or PCI, these reports provide the City with a listing of pertinent inventory and pavement condition data for each inventory unit within the City's pavement network. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report notes the names, limits, classification, dimension, surface type, and lane configuration of each inventory unit.
Detailed descriptions of the information appearing on this report are presented below:
BRANCH NAME - The name of each inventory unit appears in this column. Generally, the inventory unit name is taken directly from a street sign; however, where no street signs are posted, the name appearing on the network map is noted instead.
A sample set of street name suffix abbreviation definitions is presented below:
AVE - Avenue CT - Court CIR - Circle
DR - Drive LN - Lane RD - Road
ST - Street WY - Way EB - East Bound
NB - North Bound SB - South Bound WB - West Bound
TER - Terrace PL - Place
FROM - A description of the beginning limit of each inventory unit appears in this column. If the beginning limit exists between intersections, then the beginning limit description may be an address, post mile marker, or a distance from a known point of reference (e.g., "500' N/MAIN ST").
TO - A description of the ending limit of each inventory unit appears in this column. Like BEGIN limit, the END limit description may consist of a street name, an address, or a distance from a known point of reference. In the case of cul-de-sacs, or dead-ends, the END limit consists of and address, or a directional reference, such as "NORTH END," when no address is available.
STREET CLASSIFICATION - The codes for four street classifications are represented below. Basically, units are classified according the LA County MPAH and City classifications.
CODE DESCRIPTION
A Primary Arterial
C Collector / Secondary
E Local
SURFACE TYPE - A code was assigned to each inventory unit to describe surface type.
CODE DESCRIPTION
AC Asphalt Concrete
AAC Asphalt Overlay over original AC construction
PCC Concrete
City of South El Monte Page 3
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section III
LENGTH - The length of the section within each branch.
UNITS - The unit of measurement for the section length, typically linear feet (LF).
AREA - The area of each section within a branch.
UNITS - The unit of measurement for the section area, typically square feet (SF).
PCI - Pavement Condition Indices were calculated for inventory units based on severity and extent of distress manifestations observed within the inventory unit. Ranging between 0 and 100, a PCI of "100" corresponds to a pavement at the beginning of its life cycle, while a PCI of "0" corresponds to a badly deteriorated pavement which is at or near the end of its life cycle.
PCI CLIMATE, LOAD AND OTHER – reflects “Section Extrapolated Distress”; these values are shown within the Sample Distresses tab within the PCI window. Distresses are aggregated based on the type and severity level. For random samples, distress quantities are adjusted to reflect the extrapolated value based on the sections total area. Extrapolated distress deducts are classified as resulting from Climate, Load and Other distresses. The Distress Classification portion of the tab shows the “percent” of extrapolated distress deduct belonging to Climate, Load and Other (these %’s are shown within the PCI reports herein). These values are beneficial in that they support the decision whether recommend slurry seal, overlay or reconstruction project for street sections.
INSPECTION DATE – Represents the most recent inspection date performed on a given sections. PCI shown is historical in value and may not indicate what “today’s” PCI is due to variance in time. Pavement deterioration calculations can be performed on a section(s) to demonstrate a deteriorated PCI based upon a new current date.
City of South El Monte Page 4
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section III
Figure 12 – 2023 South El Monte Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Map City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A-Z)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Arterials
Durfee Ave 1060 Durfee Ave West City Limits (EB) SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (EB) A AC 2 2,590 30 77,700 5/31/23 74 49 51 0 Durfee Ave 1065 Durfee Ave SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (WB) West City Limits (WB) A AC 2 2,590 30 77,700 5/31/23 70 62 37 1 Durfee Ave 1070 Durfee Ave SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (EB) Peck Rd (EB) A AC 2 325 40 13,000 5/31/23 47 52 47 1 Durfee Ave 1075 Durfee Ave Peck Rd (WB) SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (WB) A AC 2 325 38 12,350 5/31/23 55 52 48 0 Durfee Ave 1200 Durfee Ave Michael Hunt Dr (NB) Broadmead St (NB) A AC 2 965 34 32,110 5/26/23 61 37 60 3 Durfee Ave 1205 Durfee Ave Broadmead St (SB) Michael Hunt Dr (SB) A AC 2 965 40 36,385 5/26/23 67 54 45 1 Durfee Ave 1210 Durfee Ave Broadmead St (NB) Thienes Ave (NB) A AC 2 360 30 13,060 5/26/23 73 39 61 0 Durfee Ave 1215 Durfee Ave Thienes Ave (SB) Broadmead St (SB) A AC 2 360 32 13,235 5/26/23 53 46 54 0 Durfee Ave 1220 Durfee Ave Thienes Ave (NB) End AC 250' S/ Rush St (NB) A AC 2 1,016 30 30,575 5/25/23 96 100 0 0 Durfee Ave 1225 Durfee Ave Begin AC 30' S/ Rush St (SB) Thienes Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,236 30 40,210 5/25/23 92 71 29 0 Durfee Ave 1226 Durfee Ave Begin PCC 250' S/ Rush St (NB) Rush St (NB) A PCC 0 275 30 9,285 5/31/23 66 40 20 40 Durfee Ave 1227 Durfee Ave Rush St (SB) End PCC 30' S/ Rush St (SB) A PCC 0 40 30 1,310 6/1/23 69 35 65 0 Durfee Ave 1228 Durfee Ave Rush St (NB) End PCC 60' N/ Rush St (SB) A PCC 0 120 30 4,085 6/1/23 69 23 43 34 Durfee Ave 1229 Durfee Ave Begin PCC 315' N/ Rush St (SB) Rush St (SB) A PCC 0 385 30 14,755 6/1/23 62 27 23 50 Durfee Ave 1230 Durfee Ave Begin AC 60' N/ Rush St (NB) Barringer St (NB) A AC 2 565 36 19,805 5/25/23 92 45 0 55 Durfee Ave 1235 Durfee Ave Barringer St (SB) End AC 315' N/ Rush St (SB) A AC 2 300 40 11,385 5/25/23 93 92 0 8 Fawcett Av 1610 Fawcett Ave Santa Anita Ave Cul-De-Sac/SR-60 WB Off Ramp C AAC 2 615 40 30,800 5/16/23 89 40 57 3 Garvey Ave 1820 Garvey Ave West City Limits (EB) Lee Ave (EB) A AC 2 235 35 8,156 6/1/23 64 56 32 12 Garvey Ave 1825 Garvey Ave Lee Ave (WB) West City Limits (WB) A AC 2 235 36 7,945 6/1/23 57 54 46 0 Garvey Ave 1830 Garvey Ave Lee Ave (EB) Rosemead Blvd (EB) A AC 2 375 30 13,085 5/30/23 67 29 38 33 Garvey Ave 1835 Garvey Ave Rosemead Blvd (WB) Lee Ave (WB) A AC 2 360 30 10,900 6/1/23 58 14 58 28 Garvey Ave 1840 Garvey Ave Rosemead Blvd (EB) Lashbrook Ave (EB) A AC 2 615 35 21,525 6/1/23 73 42 33 25 Garvey Ave 1845 Garvey Ave Lashbrook Ave (WB) Rosemead Blvd (WB) A AC 2 630 35 24,105 6/1/23 71 29 29 42 Garvey Ave 1850 Garvey Ave Lashbrook Ave (EB) Chico Ave (EB) A AC 2 945 35 33,075 6/1/23 73 36 63 1 Garvey Ave 1855 Garvey Ave Chico Ave (WB) Lashbrook Ave (WB) A AC 2 945 35 33,075 5/30/23 72 31 54 15 Garvey Ave 1860 Garvey Ave Chico Ave (EB) East City Limits (EB) A AC 2 1,426 35 49,910 6/1/23 85 59 15 26 Garvey Ave 1865 Garvey Ave East City Limits (WB) Chico Ave (WB) A AC 2 1,385 35 48,475 5/30/23 85 72 24 4 Merced Ave 3210 Merced Ave Santa Anita Ave Lerma Rd C AC 2 655 60 39,300 5/16/23 94 82 18 0 Merced Ave 3220 Merced Ave Lerma Rd Alesia St C AC 2 1,298 64 83,072 5/16/23 100 50 34 16 Merced Ave 3300 Merced Ave Alesia St Remer St C AC 2 785 60 47,100 5/16/23 80 46 0 54 Merced Ave 3340 Merced Ave Remer St Rush St C AC 2 1,295 60 77,700 5/31/23 80 43 29 28 Merced Ave 3350 Merced Ave Rush St Klingerman St C AC 2 1,298 60 77,880 5/31/23 74 63 26 11 Merced Ave 3360 Merced Ave Klingerman St Fern St C AC 2 1,322 62 81,964 5/16/23 84 63 34 3 Mountain V 3530 Mountain View Rd Rush St City Limits C AC 2 430 40 17,200 5/11/23 76 47 34 19 Peck Rd 3555 Peck Rd South City Limits (NB) Durfee Ave (NB) A AC 2 625 32 21,320 5/16/23 80 53 47 0 Peck Rd 3560 Peck Rd Durfee Ave (SB) South City Limits (SB) A AC 2 625 30 20,295 5/16/23 77 86 14 0 Peck Rd 3580 Peck Rd Durfee Ave (NB) SR-60 WB On/Off Ramps (NB) A AC 2 898 34 29,065 5/16/23 82 100 0 0 Peck Rd 3585 Peck Rd SR-60 WB On/Off Ramps (SB) Durfee Ave (SB) A AC 2 898 34 34,710 5/16/23 70 59 41 0 Peck Rd 3590 Peck Rd SR-60 WB On/Off Ramps (NB) Michael Hunt Dr (NB) A AC 2 900 32 31,815 5/16/23 72 42 50 8 Peck Rd 3595 Peck Rd Michael Hunt Dr (SB) SR-60 WB On/Off Ramps (SB) A AC 2 900 32 32,428 5/16/23 73 61 37 2 Peck Rd 3600 Peck Rd Rush St (NB) North City Limits (NB) A AC 2 860 40 28,660 5/16/23 55 37 58 5 Peck Rd 3605 Peck Rd North City Limits (SB) Rush St (SB) A AC 2 860 40 36,725 5/16/23 49 30 70 0 Rush St 4080 Rush St Rosemead Blvd (EB) Chico Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,245 30 37,350 5/25/23 54 43 56 1 Rush St 4085 Rush St Chico Ave (WB) Rosemead Blvd (WB) C AC 2 1,245 30 37,350 5/26/23 52 33 66 1 Rush St 4090 Rush St Chico Ave (EB) Potrero Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/25/23 76 65 34 1 Rush St 4095 Rush St Potrero Ave (WB) Chico Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/26/23 49 38 61 1 Rush St 4100 Rush St Potrero Ave (EB) Merced Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/25/23 74 65 27 8 Rush St 4105 Rush St Merced Ave (WB) Potrero Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/26/23 70 51 44 5 Rush St 4110 Rush St Merced Ave (EB) Central Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/25/23 60 41 58 1 Rush St 4115 Rush St Central Ave (WB) Merced Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/26/23 59 42 58 0 Rush St 4120 Rush St Central Ave (EB) Santa Anita Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,360 30 40,800 5/25/23 43 45 51 4 Rush St 4125 Rush St Santa Anita Ave (WB) Central Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,360 30 40,800 5/26/23 51 40 48 12 Rush St 4130 Rush St Santa Anita Ave (EB) Tyler Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,680 30 50,400 5/25/23 51 50 41 9 Rush St 4135 Rush St Tyler Ave (WB) Santa Anita Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,695 30 50,850 5/26/23 49 38 56 6 Rush St 4140 Rush St Tyler Ave (EB) Cogswell Rd (EB) C AC 2 1,050 30 31,500 5/25/23 52 48 52 0
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A-Z)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Rush St 4145 Rush St Cogswell Rd (WB) Tyler Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,050 30 31,500 5/26/23 59 44 46 10 Rush St 4150 Rush St Cogswell Rd (EB) Peck Rd (EB) C AC 2 1,600 30 48,000 5/25/23 48 39 53 8 Rush St 4155 Rush St Peck Rd (WB) Cogswell Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,600 30 48,000 5/26/23 69 52 46 2 Rush St 4160 Rush St Peck Rd (EB) End AC (125' N/ Durfee Ave) A AC 2 240 32 9,190 5/25/23 70 57 27 16 Rush St 4165 Rush St Begin AC (50' N/ Durfee Ave) Peck Rd (WB) A AC 2 310 36 10,935 6/1/23 54 40 47 13 Rush St 4170 Rush St Begin PCC (125' N/ Durfee Ave) Durfee Ave A PCC 0 125 32 4,000 6/1/23 62 23 0 77 Rush St 4175 Rush St Durfee Ave End PCC (50' N/ Durfee Ave) A PCC 0 50 36 1,800 6/1/23 34 3 47 50 Rush St 4180 Rush St Durfee Ave City Limits C AC 0 240 50 12,000 5/31/23 52 21 79 0 Santa Anit 4390 Santa Anita Ave South City Limits North City Limits A AC 2 160 60 10,100 5/30/23 63 65 33 2 Santa Anit 4420 Santa Anita Ave City Limits Fawcett Ave A AC 2 255 60 14,655 6/1/23 22 51 49 0 Santa Anit 4430 Santa Anita Ave Fawcett Ave (NB) Central Ave (NB) A AC 2 1,580 40 60,470 6/1/23 62 50 43 7 Santa Anit 4435 Santa Anita Ave Central Ave (SB) Fawcett Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,580 40 60,970 6/1/23 45 34 57 9 Santa Anit 4440 Santa Anita Ave Central Ave (NB) Vacco St (NB) A AC 2 1,345 40 53,800 6/1/23 63 49 45 6 Santa Anit 4445 Santa Anita Ave Vacco St (SB) Central Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,345 40 53,800 5/26/23 56 38 55 7 Santa Anit 4450 Santa Anita Ave Vacco St (NB) Tyler Ave (NB) A AC 2 420 32 17,175 6/1/23 54 48 52 0 Santa Anit 4455 Santa Anita Ave Tyler Ave (SB) Vacco St (SB) A AC 2 420 32 16,205 6/1/23 45 44 55 1 Santa Anit 4460 Santa Anita Ave Tyler Ave (NB) Rush St (NB) A AC 2 1,605 30 50,010 5/26/23 43 45 40 15 Santa Anit 4465 Santa Anita Ave Rush St (SB) Tyler Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,605 30 48,150 5/26/23 51 45 49 6 Santa Anit 4470 Santa Anita Ave Rush St (NB) Klingerman St (NB) A AC 2 1,535 27 39,885 5/26/23 43 49 44 7 Santa Anit 4475 Santa Anita Ave Klingerman St (SB) Rush St (SB) A AC 2 1,535 27 44,005 5/26/23 58 47 45 8 Santa Anit 4480 Santa Anita Ave Klingerman St (NB) Elliot Ave (NB) A AC 2 920 27 22,605 5/26/23 60 56 40 4 Santa Anit 4485 Santa Anita Ave Elliot Ave (SB) Klingerman St (SB) A AC 2 920 27 23,320 5/26/23 63 50 34 16 Tyler Ave 5050 Tyler Ave Santa Anita Ave (NB) Thienes Ave (NB) A AC 2 895 40 35,800 6/1/23 48 34 35 31 Tyler Ave 5055 Tyler Ave Thienes Ave (SB) Santa Anita Ave (NB) A AC 2 895 40 35,800 6/1/23 60 33 67 0 Tyler Ave 5060 Tyler Ave Thienes Ave (NB) Rush St (NB) A AC 2 1,285 40 51,400 6/1/23 43 56 40 4 Tyler Ave 5065 Tyler Ave Rush St (SB) Thienes Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,285 40 51,400 6/1/23 61 40 57 3 Tyler Ave 5070 Tyler Ave Rush St (NB) Weaver Ave (NB) A AC 2 450 40 18,000 6/1/23 60 48 50 2 Tyler Ave 5075 Tyler Ave Weaver Ave (SB) Rush St (SB) A AC 2 450 40 18,000 6/1/23 48 49 51 0 Tyler Ave 5080 Tyler Ave Weaver Ave (NB) Klingerman St (NB) A AC 2 1,205 32 41,780 6/1/23 30 37 60 3 Tyler Ave 5085 Tyler Ave Klingerman St (SB) Weaver Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,205 32 42,395 6/1/23 38 41 55 4
15.1 2,849,035
Locals
Abraham Dr 10 Abraham Dr Esteban Torres Dr Cogswell Rd E AC 2 222 26 5,772 5/15/23 65 52 45 3 Adelia Ave 60 Adelia Ave Remer St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 1,030 40 45,506 4/25/23 54 54 46 0 Adelia Ave 70 Adelia Ave Fern St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 962 36 35,785 4/25/23 83 84 16 0 Adelia Ave 80 Adelia Ave Garvey Ave City Limits (N) E AC 2 355 32 11,360 5/16/23 63 54 33 13 Adelita Ln 110 Adelita Ln Merced Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 230 30 7,990 5/31/23 57 54 46 0 Adson Pl 120 Adson Pl Farndon St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 160 28 6,126 5/15/23 51 53 47 0 Adson Pl 130 Adson Pl Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (S) E AAC 2 125 26 4,755 5/15/23 100 100 0 0 Alesia St 140 Alesia St Adelia Ave Potrero Ave E AC 2 620 36 22,320 4/25/23 52 38 62 0 Alesia St 160 Alesia St Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 486 27 14,022 5/16/23 71 100 0 0 Alesia St 170 Alesia St Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AC 2 300 30 9,345 5/10/23 41 27 71 2 Allgeyer A 180 Allgeyer Ave Maplefield St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 198 22 6,832 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Allgeyer A 190 Allgeyer Ave Maplefield St Byways St E AC 2 275 27 7,425 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Allgeyer A 200 Allgeyer Ave Byways St Central Ave E AC 2 295 34 10,030 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Allgeyer A 210 Allgeyer Ave Central Ave Farndon St E AC 2 770 28 21,560 5/11/23 44 35 65 0 Allgeyer A 220 Allgeyer Ave Farndon St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 320 27 9,585 5/11/23 42 18 82 0 Allgeyer A 230 Allgeyer Ave Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 305 22 8,228 5/11/23 87 100 0 0 Alpaca St 240 Alpaca St Strozier Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 285 28 9,238 5/10/23 38 33 67 0 Alpaca St 250 Alpaca St Strozier Ave Central Ave E AC 2 938 28 26,264 5/10/23 35 30 68 2 Andrews St 260 Andrews St Farmer Ave Lexham Ave E AC 2 565 36 20,340 5/16/23 48 26 74 0 Andrews St 280 Andrews St Lexham Ave City Limits (W) E AC 2 185 36 6,660 5/16/23 48 43 57 0 Arcy Ln 290 Arcy Ln Esteban Torres Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 108 34 4,650 5/15/23 72 93 0 7 Backford S 300 Backford St Gomez Palacio Dr Cogswell Rd E AC 2 480 24 13,705 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Barringer 310 Barringer St Durfee Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 483 36 19,375 5/11/23 27 28 72 0 Broadmead 320 Broadmead St Central Ave Doreen Ave E AC 2 685 32 22,365 5/10/23 77 72 28 0
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A-Z)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Broadmead 340 Broadmead St Maxson Rd Durfee Ave (Frontage) E AC 2 555 28 15,540 5/11/23 77 91 9 0 Broadmead 360 Broadmead St Durfee Ave Fruitvale Ave E AC 2 705 34 23,970 5/11/23 40 50 49 1 Broadmead 380 Broadmead St Fruitvale Ave Farndon St E AC 2 800 34 27,550 5/31/23 45 50 49 1 Bruin Ave 400 Bruin Ave Garvey Ave Rosemead Blvd/End E AC 2 680 40 28,105 5/16/23 40 50 50 0 Bunker Ave 420 Bunker Ave Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (S) E AAC 2 168 25 5,515 5/15/23 100 39 53 8 Bunker Ave 430 Bunker Ave Broadmead St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 740 34 25,955 5/15/23 45 47 52 1 Burkett Rd 440 Burkett Rd Thienes Ave South End E AC 2 550 34 18,700 5/31/23 45 45 48 7 Byways St 445 Byways St Cogswell Rd Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 176 24 5,710 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Byways St 450 Byways St Penn Mar Ave Allgeyer Ave E AC 2 285 34 11,365 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Byways St 460 Byways St Durfee Ave Linard St E AC 2 1,035 26 28,955 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Central Av 490 Central Ave Durfee Ave Allgeyer Ave E AC 2 615 32 20,975 5/11/23 79 82 18 0 Central Av 510 Central Ave Allgeyer Ave Cogswell Rd E AC 2 820 32 26,240 5/11/23 62 40 44 16 Central Av 520 Central Ave Cogswell Rd Lidcombe Ave E AC 2 420 34 14,330 5/11/23 62 32 44 24 Central Av 540 Central Ave Lidcombe Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 545 36 19,620 5/31/23 54 41 40 19 Central Av 550 Central Ave Santa Anita Ave Lerma Rd E AC 2 725 36 26,100 5/11/23 89 100 0 0 Central Av 570 Central Ave Lerma Rd Vacco St E AC 2 552 36 19,872 5/11/23 99 100 0 0 Central Av 590 Central Ave Vacco St Alpaca St E AC 2 580 36 20,880 5/15/23 95 60 29 11 Central Av 620 Central Ave Alpaca St Rush St E AC 2 1,025 40 39,175 5/15/23 91 46 0 54 Central Av 630 Central Ave Rush St Enloe St E AC 2 630 40 25,200 5/15/23 71 68 31 1 Central Av 660 Central Ave Enloe St Klingerman St (S) E AC 2 664 36 23,904 5/15/23 88 97 0 3 Central Av 690 Central Ave Klingerman St (S) Schmidt Rd E AC 2 660 36 23,760 5/15/23 86 95 0 5 Central Av 710 Central Ave Schmidt Rd Fern St E AC 2 646 36 23,256 5/15/23 86 100 0 0 Chico Ave 750 Chico Ave South End (NB Only) 175' N/ Whittier Narrows Enteran E AC 2 540 20 10,800 4/25/23 69 47 41 12 Chico Ave 770 Chico Ave 175' N/ Whittier Narrows Enteran Alpaca St E AC 2 865 40 34,600 4/25/23 74 65 31 4 Chico Ave 790 Chico Ave Alpaca St Rush St E AC 2 965 40 38,600 5/31/23 72 63 37 0 Chico Ave 810 Chico Ave Rush St Fern St E AC 2 2,620 37 96,940 4/25/23 34 37 50 13 Chico Ave 830 Chico Ave Fern St Garvey Ave E AC 2 1,286 32 41,152 4/25/23 35 35 52 13 Cogswell R 860 Cogswell Rd Gomez Palacio Dr Maplefield St E AC 2 450 33 14,850 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Cogswell R 880 Cogswell Rd Maplefield St Central Ave E AC 2 730 32 23,360 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Cogswell R 920 Cogswell Rd Michael Hunt Dr Thienes Ave E AC 2 1,280 36 46,080 5/11/23 75 43 17 40 Cogswell R 930 Cogswell Rd Thienes Ave Rush St E AC 2 1,272 37 47,064 5/11/23 66 29 71 0 Continenta 940 Continental Ave Weaver Ave Klingerman St E AC 2 908 36 32,688 5/10/23 83 75 0 25 Continenta 950 Continental Ave Klingerman St Elliott Ave E AC 2 895 36 32,220 5/10/23 42 38 62 0 Cortada St 980 Cortada St Cul-De-Sac (SW) City Limits 180' E/ CDS E AC 2 180 35 8,625 5/16/23 71 69 27 4 Danielson 990 Danielson Dr Gomez Palacio Dr Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 360 32 13,420 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Delco Ave 1000 Delco Ave Thienes Ave Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 305 28 8,790 5/10/23 97 75 0 25 Delco Ave 1010 Delco Ave Schmidt Rd Fern St E AC 2 448 32 14,336 5/10/23 93 87 0 13 Doreen Ave 1020 Doreen Ave Broadmead St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 443 33 15,115 5/10/23 81 100 0 0 Doreen Ave 1030 Doreen Ave Rush St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 625 40 26,026 5/11/23 83 40 60 0 Doreen Ave 1050 Doreen Ave Schmidt Rd Fern St E AC 2 575 32 18,310 5/10/23 90 40 60 0 Durfee Ave 1080 Durfee Ave Peck Rd Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 276 44 14,385 5/31/23 89 58 0 42 Durfee Ave 1150 Durfee Ave Maplefield St Central Ave E AC 2 400 36 14,810 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Durfee Ave 1170 Durfee Ave Central Ave Linard St E AC 2 545 36 19,620 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Durfee Ave 1180 Durfee Ave Linard St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 805 40 32,200 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 DurfeeFron 1240 Durfee Ave (Frontage) Parlin St Broadmead St E AC 2 742 26 19,292 5/15/23 79 54 33 13 Edwards Av 1250 Edwards Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,276 36 45,936 5/10/23 49 49 51 0 Edwards Av 1260 Edwards Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,285 36 46,260 5/31/23 62 64 36 0 El Poche 1300 El Poche St Chico Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 745 32 27,395 4/25/23 49 42 56 2 El Poche 1320 El Poche St Strozier Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 335 24 9,465 5/10/23 41 54 46 0 El Poche 1330 El Poche St Strozier Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 580 28 15,925 5/10/23 40 40 52 8 Elliott Av 1340 Elliott Ave Santa Anita Ave City Limits 135' E/ Granada Ave E AC 2 435 32 15,930 5/10/23 97 0 0 100 Elliott Av 1350 Elliott Ave Paulson Ave Continental Ave E AC 2 645 36 23,220 5/10/23 100 100 0 0 Enloe St 1410 Enloe St Potrero Ave West End E AC 2 630 28 17,640 5/16/23 76 32 68 0 Enloe St 1430 Enloe St Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,320 36 47,520 5/10/23 81 66 33 1 Esteban To 1460 Esteban Torres Dr Central Ave Arcy Ln E AC 2 770 32 24,640 5/15/23 81 96 0 4 Esteban To 1470 Esteban Torres Dr Arcy Ln Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 382 32 13,765 5/15/23 78 90 0 10 Farmer Ave 1480 Farmer Ave Andrews St Fawcett Ave E AC 2 685 34 23,290 5/16/23 41 36 64 0
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A-Z)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Farndon St 1485 Farndon St Lidcombe Ave Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 1,018 28 29,704 5/15/23 52 49 49 2 Farndon St 1490 Farndon St Allgeyer Ave Leafdale Ave E AC 2 230 28 6,440 5/15/23 53 33 67 0 Farndon St 1500 Farndon St Leafdale Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 245 26 6,930 5/15/23 94 100 0 0 Farndon St 1510 Farndon St Peck Rd Kayann Pl E AC 2 1,072 34 36,448 5/31/23 55 42 52 6 Farndon St 1520 Farndon St Kayann Pl End E AC 2 962 34 32,708 5/31/23 53 41 59 0 Fawcett Av 1590 Fawcett Ave Lexham Ave Farmer Ave E AC 2 560 26 14,560 5/16/23 47 43 50 7 Fern St 1630 Fern St Loma Ave Lee Ave E AC 2 396 36 14,256 4/25/23 57 64 36 0 Fern St 1640 Fern St Lee Ave Troy Ave E AC 2 415 36 14,940 4/25/23 35 35 58 7 Fern St 1650 Fern St Troy Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 385 36 13,860 4/25/23 36 45 53 2 Fern St 1660 Fern St Chico Ave City Limits 100' E/ Adelia Ave E AC 2 540 36 20,727 4/25/23 79 59 32 9 Fern St 1680 Fern St City Limits 215' E/ Sastre Ave Seaman Ave E AC 2 190 32 6,080 5/15/23 100 18 82 0 Fern St 1690 Fern St Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 430 36 15,480 5/15/23 100 36 64 0 Fern St 1700 Fern St Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AC 2 370 36 13,320 5/15/23 82 100 0 0 Fern St 1720 Fern St Doreen Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 705 32 22,560 5/10/23 100 100 0 0 Fineview S 1740 Fineview St Tyler Ave Cogswell School Gate E AC 2 280 40 11,200 5/10/23 40 54 46 0 Floradale 1750 Floradale Ave Thienes Ave Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 623 40 29,060 5/11/23 20 10 74 16 Floradale 1760 Floradale Ave Thienes Ave Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 620 42 29,965 5/11/23 23 25 71 4 Floradale 1770 Floradale Ave Rush St South End E AC 2 622 34 21,148 5/11/23 33 40 60 0 Frank Stil 1780 Frank Stiles St Rush St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 545 36 23,148 5/11/23 67 50 18 32 Fruitvale 1790 Fruitvale Ave Broadmead St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 618 36 22,845 5/31/23 41 50 49 1 Galax St 1800 Galax St Lidcombe Ave Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 1,030 28 28,840 5/15/23 49 43 57 0 Galax St 1810 Galax St Leafdale Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 315 22 8,435 5/15/23 91 100 0 0 Giovane St 1990 Giovane St Lashbrook Ave Chico Ave E AC 2 815 36 29,590 6/1/23 58 29 69 2 Gomez Pala 2030 Gomez Palacio Dr Danielson Dr Backford St E AC 2 430 28 13,270 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Granada Av 2040 Granada Ave Weaver Ave Klingerman St E AC 2 556 36 20,016 5/10/23 93 93 0 7 Granada Av 2050 Granada Ave Schmidt Rd Elliott Ave E AC 2 440 25 11,000 5/10/23 22 53 47 0 Haig St 2060 Haig St Leafdale Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 140 25 4,740 5/15/23 90 100 0 0 Haven Park 2070 Haven Park St Fern St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 156 30 5,910 5/15/23 86 100 0 0 Havenpark 2080 Havenpark Ave Lerma Rd Remer St E AC 2 1,018 32 32,576 5/10/23 77 70 28 2 Havenpark 2090 Havenpark Ave Schmidt Rd Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 195 32 7,155 5/10/23 84 100 0 0 Haymond St 2100 Haymond St Cogswell Rd Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 235 24 8,370 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Hayward Wa 2110 Hayward Way Merced Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 594 40 26,943 5/16/23 37 47 48 5 Holtwood A 2120 Holtwood Ave Byways St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 315 25 9,200 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Humbert Av 2160 Humbert Ave Garvey Ave City Limits (Potrero Middle Schoo E AC 2 690 36 24,840 5/16/23 67 44 48 8 Joe Vargas 2170 Joe Vargas Way Potrero Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 560 40 26,450 5/16/23 53 80 17 3 Kale St 2200 Kale St Potrero Ave Seaman Ave E AC 2 834 36 30,024 5/16/23 28 33 67 0 Kayann Pl 2240 Kayann Pl Linard St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 135 26 4,965 5/15/23 55 50 50 0 Kayann Pl 2250 Kayann Pl Farndon St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 280 32 8,960 5/15/23 45 54 39 7 Kayford Av 2260 Kayford Ave La Madrina Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 422 22 10,920 6/1/23 61 65 26 9 Klingerman 2270 Klingerman St Loma Ave Lee Ave E AC 2 400 36 14,400 4/25/23 86 46 54 0 Klingerman 2280 Klingerman St Lee Ave Troy Ave E AC 2 400 36 14,400 4/25/23 42 29 70 1 Klingerman 2290 Klingerman St Troy Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 385 36 13,860 4/25/23 43 27 73 0 Klingerman 2300 Klingerman St West End Potrero Ave E AC 2 998 62 61,876 5/16/23 19 10 89 1 Klingerman 2310 Klingerman St Potrero Ave Seaman Ave E AC 2 830 36 29,880 5/31/23 36 40 60 0 Klingerman 2320 Klingerman St Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 415 35 14,525 5/16/23 30 45 51 4 Klingerman 2330 Klingerman St Merced Ave Edwards Ave E AC 2 605 36 21,780 5/10/23 38 48 52 0 Klingerman 2340 Klingerman St Edwards Ave Central Ave E AC 2 635 36 22,860 5/10/23 46 54 41 5 Klingerman 2390 Klingerman St Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,330 32 42,810 5/10/23 42 46 49 5 Klingerman 2400 Klingerman St Santa Anita Ave Continental Ave E AC 2 1,245 36 44,820 5/10/23 52 53 47 0 Klingerman 2410 Klingerman St Continental Ave Tyler Ave E AC 2 765 36 27,540 5/31/23 53 75 25 0 Klingerman 2420 Klingerman St Tyler Ave City Limits 285' E/ Tyler Ave E AC 2 320 36 12,427 5/10/23 91 94 0 6 La Madrina 2500 La Madrina Dr Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 486 28 14,508 5/16/23 67 72 23 5 Lashbrook 2540 Lashbrook Ave Garvey Ave End AC 250' S/ Giovane St E AC 2 625 36 22,500 5/16/23 99 100 0 0 Lashbrook 2550 Lashbrook Ave Garvey Ave City Limits (N) E AC 2 265 36 9,540 5/16/23 98 100 0 0 Lawton St 2570 Lawton St Seaman Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 450 24 12,265 5/31/23 61 53 33 14 Leafdale A 2600 Leafdale Ave Central Ave Linard St E AC 2 570 32 18,240 5/15/23 78 80 20 0 Leafdale A 2610 Leafdale Ave Linard St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 730 34 24,820 5/15/23 81 62 18 20
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A-Z)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Leafdale A 2620 Leafdale Ave Michael Hunt Dr Remer St E AC 2 510 26 14,145 5/15/23 83 75 0 25 Leafdale A 2640 Leafdale Ave Remer St Thienes Ave E AC 2 745 36 26,820 5/15/23 68 44 51 5 Lee Ave 2660 Lee Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,305 36 46,980 4/25/23 25 37 57 6 Lee Ave 2670 Lee Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,325 36 47,700 4/25/23 35 33 61 6 Lee Ave 2680 Lee Ave Fern St Mabel Ave E AC 2 980 36 35,280 4/25/23 27 34 58 8 Lee Ave 2690 Lee Ave Mabel Ave Garvey Ave E AC 2 345 36 12,420 4/25/23 39 25 48 27 Lerma Rd 2720 Lerma Rd City Limits (180' SW/ Merced Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 180 37 6,660 5/10/23 55 23 75 2 Lerma Rd 2730 Lerma Rd Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AAC 2 610 33 20,480 5/10/23 78 98 0 2 Lerma Rd 2740 Lerma Rd Strozier Ave Central Ave E AAC 2 1,130 33 37,695 5/10/23 80 100 0 0 Lexham Ave 2770 Lexham Ave Andrews St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 280 36 10,400 5/16/23 66 65 24 11 Lexham Ave 2780 Lexham Ave Andrews St Fawcett Ave E AC 2 635 36 22,860 5/31/23 40 35 63 2 Lexham Ave 2790 Lexham Ave Michael Hunt Dr Remer St E AC 2 507 26 14,155 5/15/23 34 35 65 0 Lexington- 2800 Lexington-Gallatin Rd Andrews St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AAC 2 413 36 15,405 5/16/23 92 100 0 0 Lidcombe A 2820 Lidcombe Ave Central Ave Farndon St E AC 2 805 37 29,785 5/31/23 37 39 56 5 Lidcombe A 2830 Lidcombe Ave Farndon St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 533 34 18,122 5/15/23 45 52 48 0 Linard St 2840 Linard St Leafdale Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 215 22 6,070 5/15/23 93 100 0 0 Linard St 2850 Linard St Durfee Ave Byways St E AC 2 345 26 10,105 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Linard St 2870 Linard St Farndon St (W) Kayann Pl E AC 2 1,005 28 30,340 5/31/23 50 39 61 0 Linard St 2880 Linard St Kayann Pl Farndon St (E) E AC 2 805 28 24,740 5/31/23 51 40 60 0 Linn Ave 2890 Linn Ave Klingerman St Kale St E AC 2 290 38 11,270 5/16/23 46 51 49 0 Loma Ave 2940 Loma Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,305 36 46,980 4/25/23 34 43 47 10 Loma Ave 2950 Loma Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,325 36 47,700 4/25/23 30 39 43 18 Loma Ave 2960 Loma Ave Fern St Mabel Ave E AC 2 1,045 36 37,620 4/25/23 34 37 51 12 Lorin Ave 3020 Lorin Ave Klingerman St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AAC 2 492 22 12,405 5/10/23 100 50 50 0 Luder Ave 3030 Luder Ave Broadmead St North End E AC 2 484 29 14,036 5/10/23 88 93 0 7 Luder Ave 3040 Luder Ave Schmidt Rd Fern St E AC 2 630 30 19,200 5/10/23 84 80 0 20 Mabel Ave 3060 Mabel Ave Loma Ave Lee Ave E AC 2 240 36 8,640 4/25/23 38 22 65 13 Mabel Ave 3070 Mabel Ave Lee Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 600 36 22,100 4/25/23 23 32 59 9 Maplefield 3080 Maplefield St Cogswell Rd Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 515 32 16,480 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Maplefield 3090 Maplefield St Penn Mar Ave Durfee Ave E AC 2 1,020 36 36,720 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Marybeth A 3120 Marybeth Ave Giovane St South End E AC 2 925 36 33,300 5/16/23 80 72 28 0 Max Shapir 3130 Max Shapiro Way Potrero Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 560 40 26,410 5/16/23 54 79 18 3 Maxson Rd 3200 Maxson Rd Michael Hunt Dr Thienes Ave E AC 2 1,284 36 47,105 5/15/23 33 29 68 3 Michael Hu 3370 Michael Hunt Dr Santa Anita Ave Lidcombe Ave E AC 2 476 36 17,136 5/15/23 73 34 18 48 Michael Hu 3390 Michael Hunt Dr Lidcombe Ave Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 1,035 36 37,260 5/15/23 76 52 13 35 Michael Hu 3400 Michael Hunt Dr Penn Mar Ave Leafdale Ave E AC 2 490 36 17,640 5/15/23 84 62 38 0 Michael Hu 3450 Michael Hunt Dr Leafdale Ave Durfee Ave E AC 2 700 36 25,200 5/15/23 81 59 41 0 Michael Hu 3470 Michael Hunt Dr Durfee Ave (W) Peck Rd E AC 2 245 36 8,820 5/15/23 72 72 28 0 Michael Hu 3480 Michael Hunt Dr Peck Rd Adson Pl E AC 2 545 32 17,440 5/15/23 89 100 0 0 Michael Hu 3500 Michael Hunt Dr Adson Pl Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 876 26 26,825 5/15/23 87 100 0 0 Millet Ave 3520 Millet Ave Lerma Rd Remer St E AC 2 1,350 33 44,550 5/10/23 61 36 64 0 Parlin St 3540 Parlin St Maxson Rd Durfee Ave (Frontage) E AC 2 545 28 15,260 5/15/23 86 100 0 0 Penn Mar A 3680 Penn Mar Ave Maplefield St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 320 27 9,182 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Penn Mar A 3690 Penn Mar Ave Maplefield St Byways St E AC 2 355 28 10,630 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Penn Mar A 3700 Penn Mar Ave Farndon St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 500 30 15,378 5/11/23 47 41 59 0 Penn Mar A 3720 Penn Mar Ave Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 305 22 8,765 5/11/23 94 100 0 0 Penn Mar A 3730 Penn Mar Ave Remer St Thienes Ave E AC 2 750 36 27,000 5/11/23 37 39 59 2 Penn Mar A 3740 Penn Mar Ave Thienes Ave Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 636 36 23,780 5/11/23 20 14 78 8 Penn Mar A 3742 Penn Mar Ave Rush St South End E AC 2 268 32 8,576 5/11/23 41 16 84 0 Potrero Av 3790 Potrero Ave South City Limit (Whittier Narrow Alesia St E AC 2 1,155 36 41,580 5/16/23 62 35 65 0 Potrero Av 3800 Potrero Ave Alesia St Rush St E AC 2 1,953 36 70,908 4/25/23 71 52 48 0 Potrero Av 3900 Potrero Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,295 34 44,030 4/25/23 29 33 59 8 Potrero Av 3910 Potrero Ave Klingerman St City Limits 100' N/ Kale St E AC 2 455 34 15,470 5/16/23 39 26 74 0 Potrero Av 3930 Potrero Ave City Limits 130' S/ Garvey Ave Garvey Ave E AC 2 130 40 4,198 5/16/23 20 19 81 0 Potrero Av 3940 Potrero Ave Garvey Ave City Limits 290' N/ Garvey Ave E AC 2 290 40 12,256 5/16/23 52 37 59 4 Remer St 3950 Remer St Chico Ave Adelia Ave E AC 2 635 33 21,755 4/25/23 58 45 55 0 Remer St 3970 Remer St Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AC 2 298 33 9,834 5/10/23 84 100 0 0
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, Name Order (A-Z)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Remer St 3980 Remer St Strozier Ave Millet Ave E AC 2 270 32 8,640 5/10/23 84 100 0 0 Remer St 3990 Remer St Millet Ave Central Ave E AC 2 660 32 21,120 5/10/23 86 100 0 0 Remer St 4010 Remer St Lexham Ave Leafdale Ave E AC 2 730 26 21,460 5/11/23 39 34 66 0 Remer St 4040 Remer St Maxson Rd Parlin St E AC 2 552 27 14,904 5/11/23 95 100 0 0 Rush St 4050 Rush St Loma Ave (Shared) Lee Ave (Shared) E AC 2 430 15 10,100 5/25/23 43 48 38 14 Rush St 4060 Rush St Lee Ave Troy Ave E AC 2 440 40 17,600 5/25/23 27 47 47 6 Rush St 4070 Rush St Troy Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 405 40 18,240 5/25/23 27 45 50 5 Sastre Ave 4610 Sastre Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,275 36 45,900 6/1/23 47 40 54 6 Schmidt Rd 4620 Schmidt Rd Edwards Ave Havenpark Ave E AC 2 294 31 10,145 5/10/23 84 100 0 0 Schmidt Rd 4670 Schmidt Rd Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,333 28 37,814 5/10/23 87 94 0 6 Schmidt Rd 4680 Schmidt Rd Santa Anita Ave Granada Ave E AC 2 667 20 12,655 5/10/23 35 39 56 5 Seaman Ave 4700 Seaman Ave La Madrina Dr Alesia St E AC 2 1,060 28 31,480 5/31/23 69 78 22 0 Seaman Ave 4720 Seaman Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,275 34 43,650 4/25/23 52 41 49 10 Seaman Ave 4740 Seaman Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,287 40 51,640 5/16/23 47 33 66 1 Show Ct 4750 Show Ct Farndon St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 155 27 5,525 5/15/23 53 47 53 0 Springwood 4760 Springwood St Maxson Rd Durfee Ave (Frontage) E AC 2 565 28 15,820 5/31/23 81 84 0 16 Strozier A 4770 Strozier Ave Lerma Rd Alesia St E AAC 2 975 33 32,175 5/10/23 95 100 0 0 Strozier A 4780 Strozier Ave Alesia St Remer St E AAC 2 699 32 22,368 5/10/23 96 100 0 0 Strozier A 4790 Strozier Ave Remer St Alpaca St E AAC 2 305 34 10,370 5/10/23 96 100 0 0 Strozier A 4800 Strozier Ave Alpaca St Rush St E AAC 2 1,000 32 32,000 5/10/23 95 100 0 0 Strozier A 4850 Strozier Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AAC 2 1,285 36 46,260 5/10/23 100 58 0 42 Tamora Ave 4860 Tamora Ave City Limits 80' S/ Fern St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 880 36 32,465 5/16/23 46 29 65 6 Thienes Av 4870 Thienes Ave Doreen Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 648 32 20,736 5/10/23 89 100 0 0 Thienes Av 4890 Thienes Ave Tyler Ave Floradale Ave E AC 2 613 36 22,068 5/11/23 74 39 55 6 Thienes Av 4900 Thienes Ave Floradale Ave Cogswell Rd E AC 2 390 36 14,040 5/11/23 75 33 67 0 Thienes Av 4910 Thienes Ave Cogswell Rd Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 440 36 15,840 5/11/23 85 40 60 0 Thienes Av 4920 Thienes Ave Penn Mar Ave Leafdale Ave E AC 2 440 36 15,840 5/11/23 80 46 50 4 Thienes Av 4940 Thienes Ave Leafdale Ave Maxson Rd E AC 2 440 36 15,840 5/11/23 86 79 21 0 Thienes Av 4950 Thienes Ave Maxson Rd Durfee Ave E AC 2 620 36 22,320 5/31/23 79 48 52 0 Thienes Av 4970 Thienes Ave Durfee Ave Fruitvale Ave E AC 2 815 36 29,340 5/11/23 93 93 0 7 Thienes Av 5000 Thienes Ave Fruitvale Ave Burkett Rd E AC 2 670 34 22,780 5/11/23 94 80 0 20 Thienes Av 5005 Thienes Ave Burkett Rd East End E AC 2 533 34 18,122 5/15/23 98 100 0 0 Troy Ave 5020 Troy Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,305 36 46,980 4/25/23 29 30 59 11 Troy Ave 5030 Troy Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,325 36 47,700 4/25/23 23 43 54 3 Troy Ave 5040 Troy Ave Fern St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 660 36 23,760 4/25/23 32 34 61 5 Vacco St 5200 Vacco St Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,208 40 59,600 5/15/23 34 37 55 8 Weaver Ave 5230 Weaver Ave Santa Anita Ave Continental Ave E AC 2 1,328 40 53,420 5/10/23 64 70 29 1 Weaver Ave 5310 Weaver Ave Continental Ave Tyler Ave E AC 2 690 40 27,600 5/10/23 63 98 0 2 Weaver Ave 5320 Weaver Ave Tyler Ave Mountain View Rd E AC 2 460 40 18,400 5/10/23 61 57 30 13 Weaver St 5330 Weaver St Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,330 32 43,160 5/10/23 71 54 45 1
28.7 5,282,296
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, PCI Order (0-100)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Arterials
Santa Anit 4420 Santa Anita Ave City Limits Fawcett Ave A AC 2 255 60 14,655 6/1/23 22 51 49 0 Tyler Ave 5080 Tyler Ave Weaver Ave (NB) Klingerman St (NB) A AC 2 1,205 32 41,780 6/1/23 30 37 60 3 Rush St 4175 Rush St Durfee Ave End PCC (50' N/ Durfee Ave) A PCC 0 50 36 1,800 6/1/23 34 3 47 50 Tyler Ave 5085 Tyler Ave Klingerman St (SB) Weaver Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,205 32 42,395 6/1/23 38 41 55 4 Rush St 4120 Rush St Central Ave (EB) Santa Anita Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,360 30 40,800 5/25/23 43 45 51 4 Santa Anit 4460 Santa Anita Ave Tyler Ave (NB) Rush St (NB) A AC 2 1,605 30 50,010 5/26/23 43 45 40 15 Santa Anit 4470 Santa Anita Ave Rush St (NB) Klingerman St (NB) A AC 2 1,535 27 39,885 5/26/23 43 49 44 7 Tyler Ave 5060 Tyler Ave Thienes Ave (NB) Rush St (NB) A AC 2 1,285 40 51,400 6/1/23 43 56 40 4 Santa Anit 4435 Santa Anita Ave Central Ave (SB) Fawcett Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,580 40 60,970 6/1/23 45 34 57 9 Santa Anit 4455 Santa Anita Ave Tyler Ave (SB) Vacco St (SB) A AC 2 420 32 16,205 6/1/23 45 44 55 1 Durfee Ave 1070 Durfee Ave SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (EB) Peck Rd (EB) A AC 2 325 40 13,000 5/31/23 47 52 47 1 Rush St 4150 Rush St Cogswell Rd (EB) Peck Rd (EB) C AC 2 1,600 30 48,000 5/25/23 48 39 53 8 Tyler Ave 5050 Tyler Ave Santa Anita Ave (NB) Thienes Ave (NB) A AC 2 895 40 35,800 6/1/23 48 34 35 31 Tyler Ave 5075 Tyler Ave Weaver Ave (SB) Rush St (SB) A AC 2 450 40 18,000 6/1/23 48 49 51 0 Peck Rd 3605 Peck Rd North City Limits (SB) Rush St (SB) A AC 2 860 40 36,725 5/16/23 49 30 70 0 Rush St 4095 Rush St Potrero Ave (WB) Chico Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/26/23 49 38 61 1 Rush St 4135 Rush St Tyler Ave (WB) Santa Anita Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,695 30 50,850 5/26/23 49 38 56 6 Rush St 4125 Rush St Santa Anita Ave (WB) Central Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,360 30 40,800 5/26/23 51 40 48 12 Rush St 4130 Rush St Santa Anita Ave (EB) Tyler Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,680 30 50,400 5/25/23 51 50 41 9 Santa Anit 4465 Santa Anita Ave Rush St (SB) Tyler Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,605 30 48,150 5/26/23 51 45 49 6 Rush St 4085 Rush St Chico Ave (WB) Rosemead Blvd (WB) C AC 2 1,245 30 37,350 5/26/23 52 33 66 1 Rush St 4140 Rush St Tyler Ave (EB) Cogswell Rd (EB) C AC 2 1,050 30 31,500 5/25/23 52 48 52 0 Rush St 4180 Rush St Durfee Ave City Limits C AC 0 240 50 12,000 5/31/23 52 21 79 0 Durfee Ave 1215 Durfee Ave Thienes Ave (SB) Broadmead St (SB) A AC 2 360 32 13,235 5/26/23 53 46 54 0 Rush St 4080 Rush St Rosemead Blvd (EB) Chico Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,245 30 37,350 5/25/23 54 43 56 1 Rush St 4165 Rush St Begin AC (50' N/ Durfee Ave) Peck Rd (WB) A AC 2 310 36 10,935 6/1/23 54 40 47 13 Santa Anit 4450 Santa Anita Ave Vacco St (NB) Tyler Ave (NB) A AC 2 420 32 17,175 6/1/23 54 48 52 0 Durfee Ave 1075 Durfee Ave Peck Rd (WB) SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (WB) A AC 2 325 38 12,350 5/31/23 55 52 48 0 Peck Rd 3600 Peck Rd Rush St (NB) North City Limits (NB) A AC 2 860 40 28,660 5/16/23 55 37 58 5 Santa Anit 4445 Santa Anita Ave Vacco St (SB) Central Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,345 40 53,800 5/26/23 56 38 55 7 Garvey Ave 1825 Garvey Ave Lee Ave (WB) West City Limits (WB) A AC 2 235 36 7,945 6/1/23 57 54 46 0 Garvey Ave 1835 Garvey Ave Rosemead Blvd (WB) Lee Ave (WB) A AC 2 360 30 10,900 6/1/23 58 14 58 28 Santa Anit 4475 Santa Anita Ave Klingerman St (SB) Rush St (SB) A AC 2 1,535 27 44,005 5/26/23 58 47 45 8 Rush St 4115 Rush St Central Ave (WB) Merced Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/26/23 59 42 58 0 Rush St 4145 Rush St Cogswell Rd (WB) Tyler Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,050 30 31,500 5/26/23 59 44 46 10 Rush St 4110 Rush St Merced Ave (EB) Central Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/25/23 60 41 58 1 Santa Anit 4480 Santa Anita Ave Klingerman St (NB) Elliot Ave (NB) A AC 2 920 27 22,605 5/26/23 60 56 40 4 Tyler Ave 5055 Tyler Ave Thienes Ave (SB) Santa Anita Ave (NB) A AC 2 895 40 35,800 6/1/23 60 33 67 0 Tyler Ave 5070 Tyler Ave Rush St (NB) Weaver Ave (NB) A AC 2 450 40 18,000 6/1/23 60 48 50 2 Durfee Ave 1200 Durfee Ave Michael Hunt Dr (NB) Broadmead St (NB) A AC 2 965 34 32,110 5/26/23 61 37 60 3 Tyler Ave 5065 Tyler Ave Rush St (SB) Thienes Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,285 40 51,400 6/1/23 61 40 57 3 Durfee Ave 1229 Durfee Ave Begin PCC 315' N/ Rush St (SB) Rush St (SB) A PCC 0 385 30 14,755 6/1/23 62 27 23 50 Rush St 4170 Rush St Begin PCC (125' N/ Durfee Ave) Durfee Ave A PCC 0 125 32 4,000 6/1/23 62 23 0 77 Santa Anit 4430 Santa Anita Ave Fawcett Ave (NB) Central Ave (NB) A AC 2 1,580 40 60,470 6/1/23 62 50 43 7 Santa Anit 4390 Santa Anita Ave South City Limits North City Limits A AC 2 160 60 10,100 5/30/23 63 65 33 2 Santa Anit 4440 Santa Anita Ave Central Ave (NB) Vacco St (NB) A AC 2 1,345 40 53,800 6/1/23 63 49 45 6 Santa Anit 4485 Santa Anita Ave Elliot Ave (SB) Klingerman St (SB) A AC 2 920 27 23,320 5/26/23 63 50 34 16 Garvey Ave 1820 Garvey Ave West City Limits (EB) Lee Ave (EB) A AC 2 235 35 8,156 6/1/23 64 56 32 12 Durfee Ave 1226 Durfee Ave Begin PCC 250' S/ Rush St (NB) Rush St (NB) A PCC 0 275 30 9,285 5/31/23 66 40 20 40 Durfee Ave 1205 Durfee Ave Broadmead St (SB) Michael Hunt Dr (SB) A AC 2 965 40 36,385 5/26/23 67 54 45 1 Garvey Ave 1830 Garvey Ave Lee Ave (EB) Rosemead Blvd (EB) A AC 2 375 30 13,085 5/30/23 67 29 38 33 Durfee Ave 1227 Durfee Ave Rush St (SB) End PCC 30' S/ Rush St (SB) A PCC 0 40 30 1,310 6/1/23 69 35 65 0 Durfee Ave 1228 Durfee Ave Rush St (NB) End PCC 60' N/ Rush St (SB) A PCC 0 120 30 4,085 6/1/23 69 23 43 34 Rush St 4155 Rush St Peck Rd (WB) Cogswell Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,600 30 48,000 5/26/23 69 52 46 2 Durfee Ave 1065 Durfee Ave SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (WB) West City Limits (WB) A AC 2 2,590 30 77,700 5/31/23 70 62 37 1 Peck Rd 3585 Peck Rd SR-60 WB On/Off Ramps (SB) Durfee Ave (SB) A AC 2 898 34 34,710 5/16/23 70 59 41 0 Rush St 4105 Rush St Merced Ave (WB) Potrero Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/26/23 70 51 44 5 Rush St 4160 Rush St Peck Rd (EB) End AC (125' N/ Durfee Ave) A AC 2 240 32 9,190 5/25/23 70 57 27 16 Garvey Ave 1845 Garvey Ave Lashbrook Ave (WB) Rosemead Blvd (WB) A AC 2 630 35 24,105 6/1/23 71 29 29 42 Garvey Ave 1855 Garvey Ave Chico Ave (WB) Lashbrook Ave (WB) A AC 2 945 35 33,075 5/30/23 72 31 54 15 Peck Rd 3590 Peck Rd SR-60 WB On/Off Ramps (NB) Michael Hunt Dr (NB) A AC 2 900 32 31,815 5/16/23 72 42 50 8
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, PCI Order (0-100)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Durfee Ave 1210 Durfee Ave Broadmead St (NB) Thienes Ave (NB) A AC 2 360 30 13,060 5/26/23 73 39 61 0 Garvey Ave 1840 Garvey Ave Rosemead Blvd (EB) Lashbrook Ave (EB) A AC 2 615 35 21,525 6/1/23 73 42 33 25 Garvey Ave 1850 Garvey Ave Lashbrook Ave (EB) Chico Ave (EB) A AC 2 945 35 33,075 6/1/23 73 36 63 1 Peck Rd 3595 Peck Rd Michael Hunt Dr (SB) SR-60 WB On/Off Ramps (SB) A AC 2 900 32 32,428 5/16/23 73 61 37 2 Durfee Ave 1060 Durfee Ave West City Limits (EB) SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (EB) A AC 2 2,590 30 77,700 5/31/23 74 49 51 0 Merced Ave 3350 Merced Ave Rush St Klingerman St C AC 2 1,298 60 77,880 5/31/23 74 63 26 11 Rush St 4100 Rush St Potrero Ave (EB) Merced Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/25/23 74 65 27 8 Mountain V 3530 Mountain View Rd Rush St City Limits C AC 2 430 40 17,200 5/11/23 76 47 34 19 Rush St 4090 Rush St Chico Ave (EB) Potrero Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/25/23 76 65 34 1 Peck Rd 3560 Peck Rd Durfee Ave (SB) South City Limits (SB) A AC 2 625 30 20,295 5/16/23 77 86 14 0 Merced Ave 3300 Merced Ave Alesia St Remer St C AC 2 785 60 47,100 5/16/23 80 46 0 54 Merced Ave 3340 Merced Ave Remer St Rush St C AC 2 1,295 60 77,700 5/31/23 80 43 29 28 Peck Rd 3555 Peck Rd South City Limits (NB) Durfee Ave (NB) A AC 2 625 32 21,320 5/16/23 80 53 47 0 Peck Rd 3580 Peck Rd Durfee Ave (NB) SR-60 WB On/Off Ramps (NB) A AC 2 898 34 29,065 5/16/23 82 100 0 0 Merced Ave 3360 Merced Ave Klingerman St Fern St C AC 2 1,322 62 81,964 5/16/23 84 63 34 3 Garvey Ave 1860 Garvey Ave Chico Ave (EB) East City Limits (EB) A AC 2 1,426 35 49,910 6/1/23 85 59 15 26 Garvey Ave 1865 Garvey Ave East City Limits (WB) Chico Ave (WB) A AC 2 1,385 35 48,475 5/30/23 85 72 24 4 Fawcett Av 1610 Fawcett Ave Santa Anita Ave Cul-De-Sac/SR-60 WB Off Ramp C AAC 2 615 40 30,800 5/16/23 89 40 57 3 Durfee Ave 1225 Durfee Ave Begin AC 30' S/ Rush St (SB) Thienes Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,236 30 40,210 5/25/23 92 71 29 0 Durfee Ave 1230 Durfee Ave Begin AC 60' N/ Rush St (NB) Barringer St (NB) A AC 2 565 36 19,805 5/25/23 92 45 0 55 Durfee Ave 1235 Durfee Ave Barringer St (SB) End AC 315' N/ Rush St (SB) A AC 2 300 40 11,385 5/25/23 93 92 0 8 Merced Ave 3210 Merced Ave Santa Anita Ave Lerma Rd C AC 2 655 60 39,300 5/16/23 94 82 18 0 Durfee Ave 1220 Durfee Ave Thienes Ave (NB) End AC 250' S/ Rush St (NB) A AC 2 1,016 30 30,575 5/25/23 96 100 0 0 Merced Ave 3220 Merced Ave Lerma Rd Alesia St C AC 2 1,298 64 83,072 5/16/23 100 50 34 16
15.1 2,849,035
Locals
Klingerman 2300 Klingerman St West End Potrero Ave E AC 2 998 62 61,876 5/16/23 19 10 89 1 Floradale 1750 Floradale Ave Thienes Ave Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 623 40 29,060 5/11/23 20 10 74 16 Penn Mar A 3740 Penn Mar Ave Thienes Ave Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 636 36 23,780 5/11/23 20 14 78 8 Potrero Av 3930 Potrero Ave City Limits 130' S/ Garvey Ave Garvey Ave E AC 2 130 40 4,198 5/16/23 20 19 81 0 Granada Av 2050 Granada Ave Schmidt Rd Elliott Ave E AC 2 440 25 11,000 5/10/23 22 53 47 0 Floradale 1760 Floradale Ave Thienes Ave Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 620 42 29,965 5/11/23 23 25 71 4 Mabel Ave 3070 Mabel Ave Lee Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 600 36 22,100 4/25/23 23 32 59 9 Troy Ave 5030 Troy Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,325 36 47,700 4/25/23 23 43 54 3 Lee Ave 2660 Lee Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,305 36 46,980 4/25/23 25 37 57 6 Barringer 310 Barringer St Durfee Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 483 36 19,375 5/11/23 27 28 72 0 Lee Ave 2680 Lee Ave Fern St Mabel Ave E AC 2 980 36 35,280 4/25/23 27 34 58 8 Rush St 4060 Rush St Lee Ave Troy Ave E AC 2 440 40 17,600 5/25/23 27 47 47 6 Rush St 4070 Rush St Troy Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 405 40 18,240 5/25/23 27 45 50 5 Kale St 2200 Kale St Potrero Ave Seaman Ave E AC 2 834 36 30,024 5/16/23 28 33 67 0 Potrero Av 3900 Potrero Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,295 34 44,030 4/25/23 29 33 59 8 Troy Ave 5020 Troy Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,305 36 46,980 4/25/23 29 30 59 11 Klingerman 2320 Klingerman St Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 415 35 14,525 5/16/23 30 45 51 4 Loma Ave 2950 Loma Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,325 36 47,700 4/25/23 30 39 43 18 Troy Ave 5040 Troy Ave Fern St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 660 36 23,760 4/25/23 32 34 61 5 Floradale 1770 Floradale Ave Rush St South End E AC 2 622 34 21,148 5/11/23 33 40 60 0 Maxson Rd 3200 Maxson Rd Michael Hunt Dr Thienes Ave E AC 2 1,284 36 47,105 5/15/23 33 29 68 3 Chico Ave 810 Chico Ave Rush St Fern St E AC 2 2,620 37 96,940 4/25/23 34 37 50 13 Lexham Ave 2790 Lexham Ave Michael Hunt Dr Remer St E AC 2 507 26 14,155 5/15/23 34 35 65 0 Loma Ave 2940 Loma Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,305 36 46,980 4/25/23 34 43 47 10 Loma Ave 2960 Loma Ave Fern St Mabel Ave E AC 2 1,045 36 37,620 4/25/23 34 37 51 12 Vacco St 5200 Vacco St Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,208 40 59,600 5/15/23 34 37 55 8 Alpaca St 250 Alpaca St Strozier Ave Central Ave E AC 2 938 28 26,264 5/10/23 35 30 68 2 Chico Ave 830 Chico Ave Fern St Garvey Ave E AC 2 1,286 32 41,152 4/25/23 35 35 52 13 Fern St 1640 Fern St Lee Ave Troy Ave E AC 2 415 36 14,940 4/25/23 35 35 58 7 Lee Ave 2670 Lee Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,325 36 47,700 4/25/23 35 33 61 6 Schmidt Rd 4680 Schmidt Rd Santa Anita Ave Granada Ave E AC 2 667 20 12,655 5/10/23 35 39 56 5 Fern St 1650 Fern St Troy Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 385 36 13,860 4/25/23 36 45 53 2 Klingerman 2310 Klingerman St Potrero Ave Seaman Ave E AC 2 830 36 29,880 5/31/23 36 40 60 0 Hayward Wa 2110 Hayward Way Merced Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 594 40 26,943 5/16/23 37 47 48 5 Lidcombe A 2820 Lidcombe Ave Central Ave Farndon St E AC 2 805 37 29,785 5/31/23 37 39 56 5
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, PCI Order (0-100)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Penn Mar A 3730 Penn Mar Ave Remer St Thienes Ave E AC 2 750 36 27,000 5/11/23 37 39 59 2 Alpaca St 240 Alpaca St Strozier Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 285 28 9,238 5/10/23 38 33 67 0 Klingerman 2330 Klingerman St Merced Ave Edwards Ave E AC 2 605 36 21,780 5/10/23 38 48 52 0 Mabel Ave 3060 Mabel Ave Loma Ave Lee Ave E AC 2 240 36 8,640 4/25/23 38 22 65 13 Lee Ave 2690 Lee Ave Mabel Ave Garvey Ave E AC 2 345 36 12,420 4/25/23 39 25 48 27 Potrero Av 3910 Potrero Ave Klingerman St City Limits 100' N/ Kale St E AC 2 455 34 15,470 5/16/23 39 26 74 0 Remer St 4010 Remer St Lexham Ave Leafdale Ave E AC 2 730 26 21,460 5/11/23 39 34 66 0 Broadmead 360 Broadmead St Durfee Ave Fruitvale Ave E AC 2 705 34 23,970 5/11/23 40 50 49 1 Bruin Ave 400 Bruin Ave Garvey Ave Rosemead Blvd/End E AC 2 680 40 28,105 5/16/23 40 50 50 0 El Poche 1330 El Poche St Strozier Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 580 28 15,925 5/10/23 40 40 52 8 Fineview S 1740 Fineview St Tyler Ave Cogswell School Gate E AC 2 280 40 11,200 5/10/23 40 54 46 0 Lexham Ave 2780 Lexham Ave Andrews St Fawcett Ave E AC 2 635 36 22,860 5/31/23 40 35 63 2 Alesia St 170 Alesia St Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AC 2 300 30 9,345 5/10/23 41 27 71 2 El Poche 1320 El Poche St Strozier Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 335 24 9,465 5/10/23 41 54 46 0 Farmer Ave 1480 Farmer Ave Andrews St Fawcett Ave E AC 2 685 34 23,290 5/16/23 41 36 64 0 Fruitvale 1790 Fruitvale Ave Broadmead St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 618 36 22,845 5/31/23 41 50 49 1 Penn Mar A 3742 Penn Mar Ave Rush St South End E AC 2 268 32 8,576 5/11/23 41 16 84 0 Allgeyer A 220 Allgeyer Ave Farndon St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 320 27 9,585 5/11/23 42 18 82 0 Continenta 950 Continental Ave Klingerman St Elliott Ave E AC 2 895 36 32,220 5/10/23 42 38 62 0 Klingerman 2280 Klingerman St Lee Ave Troy Ave E AC 2 400 36 14,400 4/25/23 42 29 70 1 Klingerman 2390 Klingerman St Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,330 32 42,810 5/10/23 42 46 49 5 Klingerman 2290 Klingerman St Troy Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 385 36 13,860 4/25/23 43 27 73 0 Rush St 4050 Rush St Loma Ave (Shared) Lee Ave (Shared) E AC 2 430 15 10,100 5/25/23 43 48 38 14 Allgeyer A 210 Allgeyer Ave Central Ave Farndon St E AC 2 770 28 21,560 5/11/23 44 35 65 0 Broadmead 380 Broadmead St Fruitvale Ave Farndon St E AC 2 800 34 27,550 5/31/23 45 50 49 1 Bunker Ave 430 Bunker Ave Broadmead St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 740 34 25,955 5/15/23 45 47 52 1 Burkett Rd 440 Burkett Rd Thienes Ave South End E AC 2 550 34 18,700 5/31/23 45 45 48 7 Kayann Pl 2250 Kayann Pl Farndon St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 280 32 8,960 5/15/23 45 54 39 7 Lidcombe A 2830 Lidcombe Ave Farndon St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 533 34 18,122 5/15/23 45 52 48 0 Klingerman 2340 Klingerman St Edwards Ave Central Ave E AC 2 635 36 22,860 5/10/23 46 54 41 5 Linn Ave 2890 Linn Ave Klingerman St Kale St E AC 2 290 38 11,270 5/16/23 46 51 49 0 Tamora Ave 4860 Tamora Ave City Limits 80' S/ Fern St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 880 36 32,465 5/16/23 46 29 65 6 Fawcett Av 1590 Fawcett Ave Lexham Ave Farmer Ave E AC 2 560 26 14,560 5/16/23 47 43 50 7 Penn Mar A 3700 Penn Mar Ave Farndon St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 500 30 15,378 5/11/23 47 41 59 0 Sastre Ave 4610 Sastre Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,275 36 45,900 6/1/23 47 40 54 6 Seaman Ave 4740 Seaman Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,287 40 51,640 5/16/23 47 33 66 1 Andrews St 260 Andrews St Farmer Ave Lexham Ave E AC 2 565 36 20,340 5/16/23 48 26 74 0 Andrews St 280 Andrews St Lexham Ave City Limits (W) E AC 2 185 36 6,660 5/16/23 48 43 57 0 Edwards Av 1250 Edwards Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,276 36 45,936 5/10/23 49 49 51 0 El Poche 1300 El Poche St Chico Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 745 32 27,395 4/25/23 49 42 56 2 Galax St 1800 Galax St Lidcombe Ave Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 1,030 28 28,840 5/15/23 49 43 57 0 Linard St 2870 Linard St Farndon St (W) Kayann Pl E AC 2 1,005 28 30,340 5/31/23 50 39 61 0 Adson Pl 120 Adson Pl Farndon St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 160 28 6,126 5/15/23 51 53 47 0 Linard St 2880 Linard St Kayann Pl Farndon St (E) E AC 2 805 28 24,740 5/31/23 51 40 60 0 Alesia St 140 Alesia St Adelia Ave Potrero Ave E AC 2 620 36 22,320 4/25/23 52 38 62 0 Farndon St 1485 Farndon St Lidcombe Ave Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 1,018 28 29,704 5/15/23 52 49 49 2 Klingerman 2400 Klingerman St Santa Anita Ave Continental Ave E AC 2 1,245 36 44,820 5/10/23 52 53 47 0 Potrero Av 3940 Potrero Ave Garvey Ave City Limits 290' N/ Garvey Ave E AC 2 290 40 12,256 5/16/23 52 37 59 4 Seaman Ave 4720 Seaman Ave Rush St Klingerman St E AC 2 1,275 34 43,650 4/25/23 52 41 49 10 Danielson 990 Danielson Dr Gomez Palacio Dr Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 360 32 13,420 5/15/23 53 49 51 0 Farndon St 1490 Farndon St Allgeyer Ave Leafdale Ave E AC 2 230 28 6,440 5/15/23 53 33 67 0 Farndon St 1520 Farndon St Kayann Pl End E AC 2 962 34 32,708 5/31/23 53 41 59 0 Joe Vargas 2170 Joe Vargas Way Potrero Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 560 40 26,450 5/16/23 53 80 17 3 Klingerman 2410 Klingerman St Continental Ave Tyler Ave E AC 2 765 36 27,540 5/31/23 53 75 25 0 Show Ct 4750 Show Ct Farndon St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 155 27 5,525 5/15/23 53 47 53 0 Adelia Ave 60 Adelia Ave Remer St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 1,030 40 45,506 4/25/23 54 54 46 0 Central Av 540 Central Ave Lidcombe Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 545 36 19,620 5/31/23 54 41 40 19 Max Shapir 3130 Max Shapiro Way Potrero Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 560 40 26,410 5/16/23 54 79 18 3 Farndon St 1510 Farndon St Peck Rd Kayann Pl E AC 2 1,072 34 36,448 5/31/23 55 42 52 6 Kayann Pl 2240 Kayann Pl Linard St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 135 26 4,965 5/15/23 55 50 50 0 Lerma Rd 2720 Lerma Rd City Limits (180' SW/ Merced Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 180 37 6,660 5/10/23 55 23 75 2 Adelita Ln 110 Adelita Ln Merced Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 230 30 7,990 5/31/23 57 54 46 0
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, PCI Order (0-100)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Fern St 1630 Fern St Loma Ave Lee Ave E AC 2 396 36 14,256 4/25/23 57 64 36 0 Giovane St 1990 Giovane St Lashbrook Ave Chico Ave E AC 2 815 36 29,590 6/1/23 58 29 69 2 Remer St 3950 Remer St Chico Ave Adelia Ave E AC 2 635 33 21,755 4/25/23 58 45 55 0 Kayford Av 2260 Kayford Ave La Madrina Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 422 22 10,920 6/1/23 61 65 26 9 Lawton St 2570 Lawton St Seaman Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 450 24 12,265 5/31/23 61 53 33 14 Millet Ave 3520 Millet Ave Lerma Rd Remer St E AC 2 1,350 33 44,550 5/10/23 61 36 64 0 Weaver Ave 5320 Weaver Ave Tyler Ave Mountain View Rd E AC 2 460 40 18,400 5/10/23 61 57 30 13 Central Av 510 Central Ave Allgeyer Ave Cogswell Rd E AC 2 820 32 26,240 5/11/23 62 40 44 16 Central Av 520 Central Ave Cogswell Rd Lidcombe Ave E AC 2 420 34 14,330 5/11/23 62 32 44 24 Edwards Av 1260 Edwards Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AC 2 1,285 36 46,260 5/31/23 62 64 36 0 Potrero Av 3790 Potrero Ave South City Limit (Whittier Narrow Alesia St E AC 2 1,155 36 41,580 5/16/23 62 35 65 0 Adelia Ave 80 Adelia Ave Garvey Ave City Limits (N) E AC 2 355 32 11,360 5/16/23 63 54 33 13 Weaver Ave 5310 Weaver Ave Continental Ave Tyler Ave E AC 2 690 40 27,600 5/10/23 63 98 0 2 Weaver Ave 5230 Weaver Ave Santa Anita Ave Continental Ave E AC 2 1,328 40 53,420 5/10/23 64 70 29 1 Abraham Dr 10 Abraham Dr Esteban Torres Dr Cogswell Rd E AC 2 222 26 5,772 5/15/23 65 52 45 3 Cogswell R 930 Cogswell Rd Thienes Ave Rush St E AC 2 1,272 37 47,064 5/11/23 66 29 71 0 Lexham Ave 2770 Lexham Ave Andrews St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 280 36 10,400 5/16/23 66 65 24 11 Frank Stil 1780 Frank Stiles St Rush St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 545 36 23,148 5/11/23 67 50 18 32 Humbert Av 2160 Humbert Ave Garvey Ave City Limits (Potrero Middle Schoo E AC 2 690 36 24,840 5/16/23 67 44 48 8 La Madrina 2500 La Madrina Dr Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 486 28 14,508 5/16/23 67 72 23 5 Leafdale A 2640 Leafdale Ave Remer St Thienes Ave E AC 2 745 36 26,820 5/15/23 68 44 51 5 Chico Ave 750 Chico Ave South End (NB Only) 175' N/ Whittier Narrows Enteran E AC 2 540 20 10,800 4/25/23 69 47 41 12 Seaman Ave 4700 Seaman Ave La Madrina Dr Alesia St E AC 2 1,060 28 31,480 5/31/23 69 78 22 0 Alesia St 160 Alesia St Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 486 27 14,022 5/16/23 71 100 0 0 Central Av 630 Central Ave Rush St Enloe St E AC 2 630 40 25,200 5/15/23 71 68 31 1 Cortada St 980 Cortada St Cul-De-Sac (SW) City Limits 180' E/ CDS E AC 2 180 35 8,625 5/16/23 71 69 27 4 Potrero Av 3800 Potrero Ave Alesia St Rush St E AC 2 1,953 36 70,908 4/25/23 71 52 48 0 Weaver St 5330 Weaver St Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,330 32 43,160 5/10/23 71 54 45 1 Arcy Ln 290 Arcy Ln Esteban Torres Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 108 34 4,650 5/15/23 72 93 0 7 Chico Ave 790 Chico Ave Alpaca St Rush St E AC 2 965 40 38,600 5/31/23 72 63 37 0 Michael Hu 3470 Michael Hunt Dr Durfee Ave (W) Peck Rd E AC 2 245 36 8,820 5/15/23 72 72 28 0 Michael Hu 3370 Michael Hunt Dr Santa Anita Ave Lidcombe Ave E AC 2 476 36 17,136 5/15/23 73 34 18 48 Chico Ave 770 Chico Ave 175' N/ Whittier Narrows EnteranAlpaca St E AC 2 865 40 34,600 4/25/23 74 65 31 4 Thienes Av 4890 Thienes Ave Tyler Ave Floradale Ave E AC 2 613 36 22,068 5/11/23 74 39 55 6 Cogswell R 920 Cogswell Rd Michael Hunt Dr Thienes Ave E AC 2 1,280 36 46,080 5/11/23 75 43 17 40 Thienes Av 4900 Thienes Ave Floradale Ave Cogswell Rd E AC 2 390 36 14,040 5/11/23 75 33 67 0 Enloe St 1410 Enloe St Potrero Ave West End E AC 2 630 28 17,640 5/16/23 76 32 68 0 Michael Hu 3390 Michael Hunt Dr Lidcombe Ave Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 1,035 36 37,260 5/15/23 76 52 13 35 Broadmead 320 Broadmead St Central Ave Doreen Ave E AC 2 685 32 22,365 5/10/23 77 72 28 0 Broadmead 340 Broadmead St Maxson Rd Durfee Ave (Frontage) E AC 2 555 28 15,540 5/11/23 77 91 9 0 Havenpark 2080 Havenpark Ave Lerma Rd Remer St E AC 2 1,018 32 32,576 5/10/23 77 70 28 2 Esteban To 1470 Esteban Torres Dr Arcy Ln Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 382 32 13,765 5/15/23 78 90 0 10 Leafdale A 2600 Leafdale Ave Central Ave Linard St E AC 2 570 32 18,240 5/15/23 78 80 20 0 Lerma Rd 2730 Lerma Rd Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AAC 2 610 33 20,480 5/10/23 78 98 0 2 Central Av 490 Central Ave Durfee Ave Allgeyer Ave E AC 2 615 32 20,975 5/11/23 79 82 18 0 DurfeeFron 1240 Durfee Ave (Frontage) Parlin St Broadmead St E AC 2 742 26 19,292 5/15/23 79 54 33 13 Fern St 1660 Fern St Chico Ave City Limits 100' E/ Adelia Ave E AC 2 540 36 20,727 4/25/23 79 59 32 9 Thienes Av 4950 Thienes Ave Maxson Rd Durfee Ave E AC 2 620 36 22,320 5/31/23 79 48 52 0 Lerma Rd 2740 Lerma Rd Strozier Ave Central Ave E AAC 2 1,130 33 37,695 5/10/23 80 100 0 0 Marybeth A 3120 Marybeth Ave Giovane St South End E AC 2 925 36 33,300 5/16/23 80 72 28 0 Thienes Av 4920 Thienes Ave Penn Mar Ave Leafdale Ave E AC 2 440 36 15,840 5/11/23 80 46 50 4 Doreen Ave 1020 Doreen Ave Broadmead St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 443 33 15,115 5/10/23 81 100 0 0 Enloe St 1430 Enloe St Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,320 36 47,520 5/10/23 81 66 33 1 Esteban To 1460 Esteban Torres Dr Central Ave Arcy Ln E AC 2 770 32 24,640 5/15/23 81 96 0 4 Leafdale A 2610 Leafdale Ave Linard St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 730 34 24,820 5/15/23 81 62 18 20 Michael Hu 3450 Michael Hunt Dr Leafdale Ave Durfee Ave E AC 2 700 36 25,200 5/15/23 81 59 41 0 Springwood 4760 Springwood St Maxson Rd Durfee Ave (Frontage) E AC 2 565 28 15,820 5/31/23 81 84 0 16 Fern St 1700 Fern St Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AC 2 370 36 13,320 5/15/23 82 100 0 0 Adelia Ave 70 Adelia Ave Fern St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 962 36 35,785 4/25/23 83 84 16 0 Continenta 940 Continental Ave Weaver Ave Klingerman St E AC 2 908 36 32,688 5/10/23 83 75 0 25 Doreen Ave 1030 Doreen Ave Rush St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 625 40 26,026 5/11/23 83 40 60 0 Leafdale A 2620 Leafdale Ave Michael Hunt Dr Remer St E AC 2 510 26 14,145 5/15/23 83 75 0 25
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, PCI Order (0-100)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Havenpark 2090 Havenpark Ave Schmidt Rd Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 195 32 7,155 5/10/23 84 100 0 0 Luder Ave 3040 Luder Ave Schmidt Rd Fern St E AC 2 630 30 19,200 5/10/23 84 80 0 20 Michael Hu 3400 Michael Hunt Dr Penn Mar Ave Leafdale Ave E AC 2 490 36 17,640 5/15/23 84 62 38 0 Remer St 3970 Remer St Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AC 2 298 33 9,834 5/10/23 84 100 0 0 Remer St 3980 Remer St Strozier Ave Millet Ave E AC 2 270 32 8,640 5/10/23 84 100 0 0 Schmidt Rd 4620 Schmidt Rd Edwards Ave Havenpark Ave E AC 2 294 31 10,145 5/10/23 84 100 0 0 Thienes Av 4910 Thienes Ave Cogswell Rd Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 440 36 15,840 5/11/23 85 40 60 0 Central Av 690 Central Ave Klingerman St (S) Schmidt Rd E AC 2 660 36 23,760 5/15/23 86 95 0 5 Central Av 710 Central Ave Schmidt Rd Fern St E AC 2 646 36 23,256 5/15/23 86 100 0 0 Haven Park 2070 Haven Park St Fern St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 156 30 5,910 5/15/23 86 100 0 0 Klingerman 2270 Klingerman St Loma Ave Lee Ave E AC 2 400 36 14,400 4/25/23 86 46 54 0 Parlin St 3540 Parlin St Maxson Rd Durfee Ave (Frontage) E AC 2 545 28 15,260 5/15/23 86 100 0 0 Remer St 3990 Remer St Millet Ave Central Ave E AC 2 660 32 21,120 5/10/23 86 100 0 0 Thienes Av 4940 Thienes Ave Leafdale Ave Maxson Rd E AC 2 440 36 15,840 5/11/23 86 79 21 0 Allgeyer A 230 Allgeyer Ave Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 305 22 8,228 5/11/23 87 100 0 0 Michael Hu 3500 Michael Hunt Dr Adson Pl Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 876 26 26,825 5/15/23 87 100 0 0 Schmidt Rd 4670 Schmidt Rd Central Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 1,333 28 37,814 5/10/23 87 94 0 6 Central Av 660 Central Ave Enloe St Klingerman St (S) E AC 2 664 36 23,904 5/15/23 88 97 0 3 Luder Ave 3030 Luder Ave Broadmead St North End E AC 2 484 29 14,036 5/10/23 88 93 0 7 Central Av 550 Central Ave Santa Anita Ave Lerma Rd E AC 2 725 36 26,100 5/11/23 89 100 0 0 Durfee Ave 1080 Durfee Ave Peck Rd Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 276 44 14,385 5/31/23 89 58 0 42 Michael Hu 3480 Michael Hunt Dr Peck Rd Adson Pl E AC 2 545 32 17,440 5/15/23 89 100 0 0 Thienes Av 4870 Thienes Ave Doreen Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 648 32 20,736 5/10/23 89 100 0 0 Doreen Ave 1050 Doreen Ave Schmidt Rd Fern St E AC 2 575 32 18,310 5/10/23 90 40 60 0 Haig St 2060 Haig St Leafdale Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 140 25 4,740 5/15/23 90 100 0 0 Central Av 620 Central Ave Alpaca St Rush St E AC 2 1,025 40 39,175 5/15/23 91 46 0 54 Galax St 1810 Galax St Leafdale Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 315 22 8,435 5/15/23 91 100 0 0 Klingerman 2420 Klingerman St Tyler Ave City Limits 285' E/ Tyler Ave E AC 2 320 36 12,427 5/10/23 91 94 0 6 Lexington- 2800 Lexington-Gallatin Rd Andrews St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AAC 2 413 36 15,405 5/16/23 92 100 0 0 Delco Ave 1010 Delco Ave Schmidt Rd Fern St E AC 2 448 32 14,336 5/10/23 93 87 0 13 Granada Av 2040 Granada Ave Weaver Ave Klingerman St E AC 2 556 36 20,016 5/10/23 93 93 0 7 Linard St 2840 Linard St Leafdale Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 215 22 6,070 5/15/23 93 100 0 0 Thienes Av 4970 Thienes Ave Durfee Ave Fruitvale Ave E AC 2 815 36 29,340 5/11/23 93 93 0 7 Farndon St 1500 Farndon St Leafdale Ave Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 245 26 6,930 5/15/23 94 100 0 0 Penn Mar A 3720 Penn Mar Ave Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 305 22 8,765 5/11/23 94 100 0 0 Thienes Av 5000 Thienes Ave Fruitvale Ave Burkett Rd E AC 2 670 34 22,780 5/11/23 94 80 0 20 Central Av 590 Central Ave Vacco St Alpaca St E AC 2 580 36 20,880 5/15/23 95 60 29 11 Remer St 4040 Remer St Maxson Rd Parlin St E AC 2 552 27 14,904 5/11/23 95 100 0 0 Strozier A 4770 Strozier Ave Lerma Rd Alesia St E AAC 2 975 33 32,175 5/10/23 95 100 0 0 Strozier A 4800 Strozier Ave Alpaca St Rush St E AAC 2 1,000 32 32,000 5/10/23 95 100 0 0 Strozier A 4780 Strozier Ave Alesia St Remer St E AAC 2 699 32 22,368 5/10/23 96 100 0 0 Strozier A 4790 Strozier Ave Remer St Alpaca St E AAC 2 305 34 10,370 5/10/23 96 100 0 0 Delco Ave 1000 Delco Ave Thienes Ave Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 305 28 8,790 5/10/23 97 75 0 25 Elliott Av 1340 Elliott Ave Santa Anita Ave City Limits 135' E/ Granada Ave E AC 2 435 32 15,930 5/10/23 97 0 0 100 Lashbrook 2550 Lashbrook Ave Garvey Ave City Limits (N) E AC 2 265 36 9,540 5/16/23 98 100 0 0 Thienes Av 5005 Thienes Ave Burkett Rd East End E AC 2 533 34 18,122 5/15/23 98 100 0 0 Central Av 570 Central Ave Lerma Rd Vacco St E AC 2 552 36 19,872 5/11/23 99 100 0 0 Lashbrook 2540 Lashbrook Ave Garvey Ave End AC 250' S/ Giovane St E AC 2 625 36 22,500 5/16/23 99 100 0 0 Adson Pl 130 Adson Pl Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (S) E AAC 2 125 26 4,755 5/15/23 100 100 0 0 Allgeyer A 180 Allgeyer Ave Maplefield St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 198 22 6,832 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Allgeyer A 190 Allgeyer Ave Maplefield St Byways St E AC 2 275 27 7,425 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Allgeyer A 200 Allgeyer Ave Byways St Central Ave E AC 2 295 34 10,030 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Backford S 300 Backford St Gomez Palacio Dr Cogswell Rd E AC 2 480 24 13,705 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Bunker Ave 420 Bunker Ave Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (S) E AAC 2 168 25 5,515 5/15/23 100 39 53 8 Byways St 445 Byways St Cogswell Rd Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 176 24 5,710 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Byways St 450 Byways St Penn Mar Ave Allgeyer Ave E AC 2 285 34 11,365 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Byways St 460 Byways St Durfee Ave Linard St E AC 2 1,035 26 28,955 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Cogswell R 860 Cogswell Rd Gomez Palacio Dr Maplefield St E AC 2 450 33 14,850 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Cogswell R 880 Cogswell Rd Maplefield St Central Ave E AC 2 730 32 23,360 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Durfee Ave 1150 Durfee Ave Maplefield St Central Ave E AC 2 400 36 14,810 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Durfee Ave 1170 Durfee Ave Central Ave Linard St E AC 2 545 36 19,620 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Durfee Ave 1180 Durfee Ave Linard St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 805 40 32,200 7/27/23 100 100 0 0
City of South El Monte, CA
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report - All Streets
Sorted by Rank, PCI Order (0-100)
Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Elliott Av 1350 Elliott Ave Paulson Ave Continental Ave E AC 2 645 36 23,220 5/10/23 100 100 0 0 Fern St 1680 Fern St City Limits 215' E/ Sastre Ave Seaman Ave E AC 2 190 32 6,080 5/15/23 100 18 82 0 Fern St 1690 Fern St Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 430 36 15,480 5/15/23 100 36 64 0 Fern St 1720 Fern St Doreen Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 705 32 22,560 5/10/23 100 100 0 0 Gomez Pala 2030 Gomez Palacio Dr Danielson Dr Backford St E AC 2 430 28 13,270 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Haymond St 2100 Haymond St Cogswell Rd Cul-De-Sac (E) E AC 2 235 24 8,370 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Holtwood A 2120 Holtwood Ave Byways St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 315 25 9,200 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Linard St 2850 Linard St Durfee Ave Byways St E AC 2 345 26 10,105 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Lorin Ave 3020 Lorin Ave Klingerman St Cul-De-Sac (N) E AAC 2 492 22 12,405 5/10/23 100 50 50 0 Maplefield 3080 Maplefield St Cogswell Rd Penn Mar Ave E AC 2 515 32 16,480 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Maplefield 3090 Maplefield St Penn Mar Ave Durfee Ave E AC 2 1,020 36 36,720 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Penn Mar A 3680 Penn Mar Ave Maplefield St Cul-De-Sac (S) E AC 2 320 27 9,182 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Penn Mar A 3690 Penn Mar Ave Maplefield St Byways St E AC 2 355 28 10,630 7/27/23 100 100 0 0 Strozier A 4850 Strozier Ave Klingerman St Fern St E AAC 2 1,285 36 46,260 5/10/23 100 58 0 42
28.7 5,282,296
City of South El Monte Page 1
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
SECTION IV
FORECAST MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION (FMR) REPORT
A. Increase PCI Budget, Five Year Plan – FY 2023-2028
City of South El Monte Page 2
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
FORECAST MAINTENANCE / REHABILITATION REPORT
Listed in chronological order by plan year then alphabetically by street name, this report presents the year and action corresponding to the next recommended work activity for each segment within the pavement network.
INCREASE PCI BUDGET – A recommended budget was generated for the City to demonstrate the necessary funding that is required to increase the current weighted PCI level of 63 to 66 within five years.
We have sorted the following report by functional class (rank) for easy review (Arterial – Local, A to Z order).
In general sections are chosen first and foremost on available budget; secondly, the square footage of each section plays a large factor. The software initially chooses the draft sections that will increase PCI, sustain PCI or slow PCI deterioration within the budgeted timeframe. Additionally, the types of distress, extents of distress and severities of distress (high, medium, low) also determine how sections are/can be selected.
*All multi-year budget projections include an annual 5% unit cost inflation rate for the term of the budget forecast, as well as a 25% contingency on material costs which typically cover additional project costs for contract administration, design, construction management.
The City of South El Monte makes all final decisions on what pavement sections are scheduled for improvement and within which fiscal year.
City of South El Monte Page 3
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
FORECAST MAINTENANCE /REHABILITATION MAPS
Based on the pavement section recommendations shown in the following spreadsheet report, we have included forecast maintenance / rehabilitation GIS maps that demonstrate recommended pavement sections by fiscal year and type of work.
City of South El Monte Page 4
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
Figure 13 – FY 2023-28 Forecast Maint. & Rehabilitation Map City of South El Monte Page 5
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
Figure 14 – FY 2023-24 Forecast Maint. & Rehabilitation Map City of South El Monte Page 6
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
Figure 15 – FY 2024-25 Forecast Maint. & Rehabilitation Map City of South El Monte Page 7
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
Figure 16 – FY 2025-26 Forecast Maint. & Rehabilitation Map City of South El Monte Page 8
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
Figure 17 – FY 2026-27 Forecast Maint. & Rehabilitation Map City of South El Monte Page 9
2023 Pavement Management Program
Final Report – June 14, 2023 Section IV
Figure 18 – FY 2027-28 Forecast Maint. & Rehabilitation Map City of South El Monte, CA
Forecast Maintenance / Rehabilitation (FMR) Report - FY 2023-2028 Sorted by FY, Rank, Name Order (A-Z)
FY Branch ID Sec ID Name From To Rank Type Lanes Length Width Area Insp Date PCI PCI Climate % PCI Load % PCI Other % Maint. Type Total $ Arterials / Collectors
2023-24 Rush St 4080 Rush St Rosemead Blvd (EB) Chico Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,245 30 37,350 5/25/2023 54 43 56 1 ARHM $158,738 2023-24 Rush St 4085 Rush St Chico Ave (WB) Rosemead Blvd (WB) C AC 2 1,245 30 37,350 5/26/2023 52 33 66 1 ARHM $158,738 2023-24 Rush St 4090 Rush St Chico Ave (EB) Potrero Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/25/2023 76 65 34 1 Type II Slurry $25,740 2023-24 Rush St 4095 Rush St Potrero Ave (WB) Chico Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,320 30 39,600 5/26/2023 49 38 61 1 ARHM $168,300 $511,515
2024-25 Garvey Ave 1820 Garvey Ave West City Limits (EB) Lee Ave (EB) A AC 2 235 35 8,156 6/1/2023 64 56 32 12 ARHM $36,376 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1825 Garvey Ave Lee Ave (WB) West City Limits (WB) A AC 2 235 36 7,945 6/1/2023 57 54 46 0 ARHM $35,435 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1830 Garvey Ave Lee Ave (EB) Rosemead Blvd (EB) A AC 2 375 30 13,085 5/30/2023 67 29 38 33 ARHM $58,359 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1835 Garvey Ave Rosemead Blvd (WB) Lee Ave (WB) A AC 2 360 30 10,900 6/1/2023 58 14 58 28 ARHM $48,614 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1840 Garvey Ave Rosemead Blvd (EB) Lashbrook Ave (EB) A AC 2 615 35 21,525 6/1/2023 73 42 33 25 Type II Slurry $14,637 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1845 Garvey Ave Lashbrook Ave (WB) Rosemead Blvd (WB) A AC 2 630 35 24,105 6/1/2023 71 29 29 42 Type II Slurry $16,391 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1850 Garvey Ave Lashbrook Ave (EB) Chico Ave (EB) A AC 2 945 35 33,075 6/1/2023 73 36 63 1 Type II Slurry $22,491 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1855 Garvey Ave Chico Ave (WB) Lashbrook Ave (WB) A AC 2 945 35 33,075 5/30/2023 72 31 54 15 Type II Slurry $22,491 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1860 Garvey Ave Chico Ave (EB) East City Limits (EB) A AC 2 1,426 35 49,910 6/1/2023 85 59 15 26 Type II Slurry $33,939 2024-25 Garvey Ave 1865 Garvey Ave East City Limits (WB) Chico Ave (WB) A AC 2 1,385 35 48,475 5/30/2023 85 72 24 4 Type II Slurry $32,963 2024-25 Peck Rd 3600 Peck Rd Rush St (NB) North City Limits (NB) A AC 2 860 40 28,660 5/16/2023 55 37 58 5 ARHM $127,824 2024-25 Peck Rd 3605 Peck Rd North City Limits (SB) Rush St (SB) A AC 2 860 40 36,725 5/16/2023 49 30 70 0 ARHM $163,794 2024-25 Rush St 4050 Rush St Loma Ave (Shared) Lee Ave (Shared) E AC 2 430 15 10,100 5/25/2023 43 48 38 14 ARHM $45,046 2024-25 Rush St 4060 Rush St Lee Ave Troy Ave E AC 2 440 40 17,600 5/25/2023 27 47 47 6 ARHM $78,496 2024-25 Rush St 4070 Rush St Troy Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 405 40 18,240 5/25/2023 27 45 50 5 ARHM $81,350 $818,205
2025-26 Tyler Ave 5050 Tyler Ave Santa Anita Ave (NB) Thienes Ave (NB) A AC 2 895 40 35,800 6/1/23 48 34 35 31 ARHM $159,668 2025-26 Tyler Ave 5055 Tyler Ave Thienes Ave (SB) Santa Anita Ave (NB) A AC 2 895 40 35,800 6/1/23 60 33 67 0 ARHM $159,668 2025-26 Tyler Ave 5060 Tyler Ave Thienes Ave (NB) Rush St (NB) A AC 2 1,285 40 51,400 6/1/23 43 56 40 4 ARHM $229,244 2025-26 Tyler Ave 5065 Tyler Ave Rush St (SB) Thienes Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,285 40 51,400 6/1/23 61 40 57 3 ARHM $229,244 2025-26 Tyler Ave 5070 Tyler Ave Rush St (NB) Weaver Ave (NB) A AC 2 450 40 18,000 6/1/23 60 48 50 2 ARHM $80,280 2025-26 Tyler Ave 5075 Tyler Ave Weaver Ave (SB) Rush St (SB) A AC 2 450 40 18,000 6/1/23 48 49 51 0 ARHM $80,280 2025-26 Tyler Ave 5080 Tyler Ave Weaver Ave (NB) Klingerman St (NB) A AC 2 1,205 32 41,780 6/1/23 30 37 60 3 ARHM $186,339 2025-26 Tyler Ave 5085 Tyler Ave Klingerman St (SB) Weaver Ave (SB) A AC 2 1,205 32 42,395 6/1/23 38 41 55 4 ARHM $189,082 $1,313,805
2026-27 Rush St 4130 Rush St Santa Anita Ave (EB) Tyler Ave (EB) C AC 2 1,680 30 50,400 5/25/2023 51 50 41 9 ARHM $247,968 2026-27 Rush St 4135 Rush St Tyler Ave (WB) Santa Anita Ave (WB) C AC 2 1,695 30 50,850 5/26/2023 49 38 56 6 ARHM $250,182 2026-27 Rush St 4180 Rush St Durfee Ave City Limits C AC 0 240 50 12,000 5/31/2023 52 21 79 0 ARHM $59,040 $557,190
2027-28 Durfee Ave 1060 Durfee Ave West City Limits (EB) SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (EB) A AC 2 2,590 30 77,700 5/31/2023 74 49 51 0 Type II Slurry $61,383 2027-28 Durfee Ave 1065 Durfee Ave SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (WB) West City Limits (WB) A AC 2 2,590 30 77,700 5/31/2023 70 62 37 1 Type II Slurry $61,383 2027-28 Durfee Ave 1070 Durfee Ave SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (EB) Peck Rd (EB) A AC 2 325 40 13,000 5/31/2023 47 52 47 1 ARHM $67,210 2027-28 Durfee Ave 1075 Durfee Ave Peck Rd (WB) SR-60 EB On/Off Ramps (WB) A AC 2 325 38 12,350 5/31/2023 55 52 48 0 ARHM $63,850 2027-28 Durfee Ave 1200 Durfee Ave Michael Hunt Dr (NB) Broadmead St (NB) A AC 2 965 34 32,110 5/26/2023 61 37 60 3 ARHM $166,009 2027-28 Durfee Ave 1205 Durfee Ave Broadmead St (SB) Michael Hunt Dr (SB) A AC 2 965 40 36,385 5/26/2023 67 54 45 1 Type II Slurry $28,744 2027-28 Durfee Ave 1210 Durfee Ave Broadmead St (NB) Thienes Ave (NB) A AC 2 360 30 13,060 5/26/2023 73 39 61 0 Type II Slurry $10,317 2027-28 Durfee Ave 1215 Durfee Ave Thienes Ave (SB) Broadmead St (SB) A AC 2 360 32 13,235 5/26/2023 53 46 54 0 ARHM $68,425 $527,321
Locals
2023-24 Abraham Dr 10 Abraham Dr Esteban Torres Dr Cogswell Rd E AC 2 222 26 5,772 5/15/2023 65 52 45 3 Type II Slurry $2,597 2023-24 Adelita Ln 110 Adelita Ln Merced Ave Cul-De-Sac (W) E AC 2 230 30 7,990 5/31/2023 57 54 46 0 AC Grind-Overlay $27,246 2023-24 Central Av 490 Central Ave Durfee Ave Allgeyer Ave E AC 2 615 32 20,975 5/11/2023 79 82 18 0 Type II Slurry $9,439 2023-24 Central Av 510 Central Ave Allgeyer Ave Cogswell Rd E AC 2 820 32 26,240 5/11/2023 62 40 44 16 AC Grind-Overlay $89,478 2023-24 Central Av 520 Central Ave Cogswell Rd Lidcombe Ave E AC 2 420 34 14,330 5/11/2023 62 32 44 24 AC Grind-Overlay $48,865 2023-24 Central Av 540 Central Ave Lidcombe Ave Santa Anita Ave E AC 2 545 36 19,620 5/31/2023 54 41 40 19 AC Grind-Overlay $66,904 2023-24 Central Av 630 Central Ave Rush St Enloe St E AC 2 630 40 25,200 5/15/2023 71 68 31 1 Type II Slurry $11,340 2023-24 Chico Av 810 Chico Ave Rush St Fern St E AC 2 2,620 37 96,940 4/25/23 34 37 50 13 AC Grind-Overlay $330,565 2023-24 Chico Av 830 Chico Ave Fern St Garvey Ave E AC 2 1,286 32 41,152 4/25/23 35 35 52 13 AC Grind-Overlay $140,328 $726,764
2024-25 Allgeyer A 230 Allgeyer Ave Michael Hunt Dr Cul-De-Sac (N) E AC 2 305 22 8,228 5/11/2023 87 100 0 0 Type II Slurry $3,867 2024-25 Fern St 1630 Fern St Loma Ave Lee Ave E AC 2 396 36 14,256 4/25/2023 57 64 36 0 AC Grind-Overlay $51,036 2024-25 Fern St 1640 Fern St Lee Ave Troy Ave E AC 2 415 36 14,940 4/25/2023 35 35 58 7 AC Grind-Overlay $53,485 2024-25 Fern St 1650 Fern St Troy Ave Rosemead Blvd E AC 2 385 36 13,860 4/25/2023 36 45 53 2 AC Grind-Overlay $49,619 2024-25 Fern St 1660 Fern St Chico Ave City Limits 100' E/ Adelia Ave E AC 2 540 36 20,727 4/25/2023 79 59 32 9 Type II Slurry $9,742 2024-25 Fern St 1700 Fern St Merced Ave Strozier Ave E AC 2 370 36 13,320 5/15/2023 82 100 0 0 Type II Slurry $6,260 2024-25 Klingerman St 2320 Klingerman St Seaman Ave Merced Ave E AC 2 415 35 14,525 5/16/23 30 45 51 4 AC Grind-Overlay $52,000 2024-25 Klingerman St 2330 Klingerman St Merced Ave Edwards Ave E AC 2 605 36 21,780 5/10/23 38 48 52 0 AC Grind-Overlay $77,972 2024-25 Klingerman St 2340 Klingerman St Edwards Ave Central Ave E AC 2 635 36 22,860 5/10/23 46 54 41 5 AC Grind-Overlay $81,839 2024-25 Leafdale A 2600 Leafdale Ave Central Ave Linard St E AC 2 570 32 18,240 5/15/2023 78 80 20 0 Type II Slurry $8,573 2024-25 Penn Mar A 3700 Penn Mar Ave Farndon St Michael Hunt Dr E AC 2 500 30 15,378 5/11/2023 47 41 59 0 AC Grind-Overlay $55,053