2. Transparency on Coiitamination Issues:
o l seek detailed reports on past contamination ISSUESassociated witli tbe project site and how these wilt be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, wliid'i substances are of concem, and how clean-up measures wilL ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021,
3. Ongoiug Eatvironmental Monitoring:
o l propose the estab}isliment of a plaii for ongoing environn'iental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases. T'his plan sl'iould outline how soi! vapor monitoring will be conductedpost-construction and inckudc contingency plans if vapor issues are detected dning testitxg at the building perxnit stage.
Protecting the liealth of children, vulnerable poputations, and all community members is of utmostimportance
4. Accountability in Decision-Makixig:
o Erequest the establishment of a commttriity advisory board that includes regidenlsi, environmental experts, and city officia)s to oversee the environmenta) aspects of the project. This wil! ensure accountability and provide residents witb a voice in monitoring the piaoject's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K. Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge tlie city to keep the K raiJ closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrter will likely lead to increased 'veliicle emissions, furtber degrading air quali'ty. l request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential liealth impacts on residents, Additiorially, Eadvocate for noise level testing to evaiuate the effects of increasedtraffic flow and for ongoing monitorin@ of air and noise pollution ]evels if the barrier ts removed. Engaging healtli and envitonmentai experts to analyze these im'pacts is essential.
Itit'ist that Wl]l give concerns the attention they deserve, I)ate:
',3 )=-'7' 2-':;-=
t!(/ 215
OPPOSITION TO IOt30 ADELLA PROJECT
r $notc)X a7"l'z't'e3' amopposiitgthel0130AdellaProject(the Projmt") Below, 1 have outlined my reasons for opposing, and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Comnrehenstve Environmental Tegtim Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughBnvironmentalImpactAssessinent (BIA) before the Project is approved, This assessment shou}d evaluate alJ potential eiivironmental effects, including air quality, noise pouution,and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section }5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating, to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If tis is not true, I 'would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untiue.
2. I!'ansparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detaiked reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these wili be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil aixd grotindwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing doxie after 8/17/2021,
3. Ongoing E'nvironmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environrnenta} monitoring throughout the constuction and operational phases, This plan shotdd outline how soi) vapormonitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plaits if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the health of children, vulnerab]e populations, and all commuiiity members is of utmost imporfflnce.
4. Accountabi)ity in Decision-Making:
o ! request tlie establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will erisure accountability ax'idprovide residents witli a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adeila Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o S strongly urge the city to keep the K rai) closed to all traffic, Removing the K barrier will likely )ead to increased vehiclc emissions, fuxtlier degrading air quality, I requd a comp'toehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential heaJtli impacts on resideiits.Additionally, l advocate for notse level testing to evaluatethe effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing nionitoring of air and noise pollution levels if tbe barrier is removed. Engaging health and emrironmental experts to analyze these impacts is esstintiaL
I trust that you will gi've these concerns the attention tliey deserve. sll(3,ture44Xf- Date:
IRI 216
OPPOSITJON TO ]0130ADELLAPROJECT
"Project") Below, I have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environnnental Impact Assessment (E{A) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, iiicluding air quality, noise ponution, and traffic impacts. believethat the project slyould not be quatified as exemptunder CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta! Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not tue, I would !ike to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o l seek detaited reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically, I wotild like to l<now what tests will be conducted, which substances are of coiicern, md how c.tean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As tlie Geo Tracker does not show fiuther testing doxie after 8/17/2021.
3, Ongoiug Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose tbe cstablishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throrighout the coiistruction and operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapormonitoring will be conducted post-constuctionand include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected duiing testing at the buiiding permit stage.
Protecting tlie health of cliiJdren, vu)nerable populations, and an comrntuiity members is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o I request the establislmerit of a comimu:iity advisory board that includes residents, enviroiunental expeits, and city officials to oversee the environmentai aspects of the project. Tliis will ensure accountability and provide residents witli a voice in inonitoring the proj;t's impacts.
5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRail)toremainmplaee:
o I strongly tu'ge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Reinoving the K barrier wiil ltkely lead to increased vehicfe emissions, furtherdcgrading sir quality.
Irequest a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents, AdditiorialJy, Iadvocate f'or noisc level testing to evatuate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the Liarrier is removed. Engaging healtli and environmental experts to anaJyzc these impacts is essential.
Itrust that you will giye these concerns the attention tl'iey deserve.
Si
3 jz'([
Date:
t"'15 217
OP ON TO 10230 ADELLA PROJECT
Project>') Below, I have
chaixging my opposition:
anx opposing the 10130 Adeita Project (the
my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider
1. Comprehensiye Environmental Testing:
0 I request that the developer COnduCta thorough Environmenta} Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate ali potential environmental effects, iricJuding air quality, noise pollution, arid traffic impacts, I believe that the project should riot be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categoricat Excmption uiider section 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta) Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects retating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, } wouid kike to receive the eomprehemive report that proves (he above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek &tailed repoits on past contamination ISSUESassociated witli the project site and how these will be addressed, Specifically, l would tike to know what tests will be conducted, which substances axaeof concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil aiid groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishtnent of a plait for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the constmctioi'i ai'id operational phases. This plan shou!d outline how soil vapor monito*g will 'be conducted post-cortstruction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the buitding permit stage.
Protecting tlie health of cliildren, vulnerable populatiotis, and afl community members is of u(most importance
4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o l request the establishinent of a comniunity advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officia)s to oversee the environmerita} aspeds of the project. This witl ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in moriitoririg the project's impacts.
5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRa €l)toremaininpiace:
o } stmngly urge tl':ie city to Jceepthe K raiJ closed to all traffic. Rernoving the K barrier witl likely lead to increasedveliicle emissions, furthe.r degrading air quality. l request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential healtli impaCtS On resident8. Additionally, I adVocate for nOiSe leVel tenting tO evaluate the effects of increused raffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmentat experts to analyze these impacts is essential,
Itrust conceri'is the attention they deserve.
lAJzr
Date:
218
OPPOSITION TO 10130ADF,LLAPROJECT
"Project') Bel haveoutlinedmy reasoris for opposing and corresponding requests to corisider changing m/ oppositioii:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o Irequestthattltedeve)operconductathoroughEnvironrnentalItnpactAssessrnent (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment sliould evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise polhrtion, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approva) of the project mad Rsult in Significant EFFECTSrelating tO traffie, noise, air quali§, Or water qriality. If this is not true, I would 'iike to receiye the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.
2. "ansparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detaiied reports on past contamination ISSUESassociated with the project site aiidhowthesewill be addressed.Specifically,Iwould like to know what tests will be conducted, which substaixces are of concern, and how clean-up measures wili ensure soif and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing doize after 8/17/2021.
3, Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o l propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing eriviroemal monitoring throughout the construction and operatioxial phases, Tliis plan should outline how soil vapormonitoring will be conducted post-construmon andinclude contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the health of cliildren, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance,
4. Accountabi}ity in Decision-Malcing:
o I request tl'xeestab{isinent of a community advisoiy board that includes resideints, environmental expeits, and city otEciaIs to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and proyide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Btuarier (K Rail) to remain in place:
I trust
o I strongly urge the city to keep ttxe K rail closed to all traffic, Reiinoving the K bar.i4erwili likety lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality.
Irequest a comprehensive air qua!ity assessrnerit to understand the potential health impacts on residents, Additioxially, 1 advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poliutton levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environtnental expcrts to analyze these impacts is essential,
ve these concerns tbe attention they deseye,
Date:
J l""l/u"
:,oo 219
OPPOSITJONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
xL4WOea,;s( "Project") Below,Ihave outlinedmy'reasons'for opposingoanppdoscjorrnge'shpeonlodiln3g changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o rrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentalImpactAssessrnent (BiA) beforetheProject iS apprOVediThiS assessmentSl]OuldeValuateall potenttal environmental effects, including air quality, noise polLution, and traffic impacts. } believethattheprojectshould not bequaiified asexempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Appro'val of theprojectmay resultin significant e'ffects telating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water qua!ity. If this is not true, l would Iike to receive the comprehenstve repoit that proves the above untrue,
2. Tratiripareney on Contamination Issues:
o I seekdetailed repots on past contamination issuesassociatedwith the project site andhowthese wiil beaddressed.Specifically,Iwould like to knowwhat tests will be conducted, wlxich substancesare of concern, and how clean-up measures will einsuresoil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sho'w further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoiing:
o 1 proposethe estabiishrnentof a plan for ongoiri@ environmentai monitoring throughout the constmction and opcrational phases,This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will beconducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building pertriit stage, Protecting the healih of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance.
4. Aecountability in Decision-Mal6ng:
o Irequcsttheestablishmentofacominunityadvisoryboardthatincludesresidents, en'virorunentai experis, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the proiect, This will ensureaccountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the pmject's impacts,
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in peace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K raii closed to al! traffic. Rernoving, the K barrier wili likely lead to increasedvehicle emissions, fiuther degradirig air quafityI requesta compreherisive air quality assessmentto understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally,Iadvocate for noise level'testing to evaiuatethe effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollutton levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging heaIth and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
I trust thpt concerns the attention ttey deserve,
ignature Death"); /2,,7,a
'2A( 220
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJEC'r'
x I-Ai('ze'(l<, (71p8e,,,rr<7, antopposingthe10130AdellaProject(the "Project") Below, l l'iave outlined my reasons for opposing at'id corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Compreliensive Environmenta) Testing:
o [ request tliat the developer conduct a thorough Erivironmentaf Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment sl'iould evacuate all potentia} environmental effects, including air quakity, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project shouid not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta} Projects). Approva} of the project may resuit in significant effects retating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. [f this is not true, I would iike to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination ISSUESassociated with the project site and how tliese will be addressed. Specit'ically, I would lilce to know what tests wiH measures will
show further
be conducted, which substaiices are of concern, and ltow clean-up ensure soik and groundwater safety. As the Geo 'I'racker does not testing done after 8/17/2021.
3, Ougoing Environmentai Monitortng:
o I proliose tlie establishn'ient of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring tl'iroughout (he construction and operatiotmi phases. This piaii should out!ine how soil 'irapor inoniioring win be conducted post-construction arid include contingency plaiais if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, ai'id al[ community members is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o Erequest the establishment of a coruifft'y advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This wikl ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in moxiitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adeila Ave. Concreie Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongiy urge the city to keep tbe K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K bariier wilJ Jikely lead to increased vehic}e emissions, further degrading air quakity.
I request a compreliensive air quality assessment to understaiid the potentiaJ healtli impacts Ol'l residents. Additionally, I advocate for xioise Jevet testing to evaiuate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise polli.ttion fevers if the barrier is removed. l'ngaging healtli and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential
I tiwst that you wiil give these concems the attentton they deserve.
Signature
aJzLilzs
Date:
%02-221
OPOSICiON AJ, PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
Yo
(el
corpspondientes para considerar cambiar :ini oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Aniliientalcs Exhaustiyiis:
aoMonoigioeramlepy1oWescsa('l"
o Solicito que cl desarroliador realice una Evaluaci6n de In'ipacto Ambiental (,BIA) exhaustiva antes de que se imp!cmente cualquier unidad automatiz.ada. Esta evaluaci6a debe evaluar todos fos posiblcs efectos ainbientales, incluyenclo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acitica y los impactos an el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no aeberfa caiificaia coino cxento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CE.QA, scgun ia secci6n 15332 (.Clase32 - Pi'o)iectos de Desarrolio). La aprobaci6n det proyecto liodrfa tener efec.tos significativos an el trfifico, cl raicio, la calictad del aire o la ca]idad del agua. De no gcr asf, ine gustaria recibir e.l informe completo quc lo demuestre.
2. Transpareneia solire Probletnas de C.ontaminaci6n:
o Bugco informes dctallados sobre problemas de contarninaci6n ai'itexioi:es asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Espccffican"iente, me gcistarta saber qu6 pruebasserealizar6n,cuAIessustancias son lireocupai'ites )i c6mo fas medid35 de limpieza asegurari la segu'iidad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker 110 rnuestra prucbas adicionaies rcalizadas despciesdel 17/08/'2021, 3, Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propcngo cl estable.ciinienfo de un plan para el monitoreo amliiental continuo di;rai'ite las fascs de construcci6n y opcraci6ii. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se rcalizarA cl monitoreo de vapor de sueJodespu6s de la coristrucci6n e incluir plat;es da contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en }a etapa dc permiso de construcci6n Protcgcr [a salud de Los niffos, las poblacionea vulnerabfes y todos 10Smiembros de Jacornuiiidad es de rnhxirna importancia.
4. Responsabijidad en la Toma de Deeisioues:
o Solicito el estalilecimiento de un consqjo asesot comunitario qtie incluya a residentcs, expertos en medio ainbiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar Josaspeclosatnbientalesdel proyecto,EsLogarantizarAla reridici6ii de cuentas>i brindai* a los residentes ctria voz en ei monitorco de los iinpactos clel proyecto.
5. La bsn'rera (K Rail) de Ade)la kve. permanecerA en su lugar:
a iLJr)jo cncarecidan'icnte a la citujaJ a mai'rleiier el K rai:t cetrado a todo trAfico.
Lcvantar la baiarerade! K probablernente conducir;' a un aumcnto cn ias eruisiones de vehiculos, degradando auui n"iAs la calidiJ deE aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n imcgral da la calidad dcl aire para con'iprender loS p<ysibles impactos en la salud & los residentes- AdemJis, abogo porrealizar prucbas de niveles de ruido paraeiraluar 108 e[actos dcl aumen[o cn el flujo cte trAfico y por un rnonitoreo c.ontinuo de los nivcles dc coiitai'x'iinaci6n del aire y act niido si se ievanta la barrcra. Es esencial involucrar a ex)iertos en salud y ii'icdio ambiente para aria}izar eslos impaclos.
Coni'io en que darAn a estas lircocupacioncs la atenci6n qtle nlereCen, Fiitna Fecha
0 / n,r /2 0",:,5-
222
oposxcMi ALPROYECTO 10130 AJ)ELLA
@itliq7>S4'h:""'5 meopongoalPmyemolOl30Adella
(el"Pmyecto"). A mntinuaci6n, he expuestomis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes rrespondtentes pain considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Ambientales Exbaustivas:
o SoHcito que ei desarrollador realice una Bvalmci6n de Impacto Ambiental (E}A) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta maluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambienWes, inc}uyendo la calidad del aire, lacontaminaci6hactistica y los impactos en el lit)co. Creoque el proyecto no debeiia caiificar coma exento bajo !a Exenci6n Categ6riea de la CEQA, segmlasecci6n 15332 (Clai 32 - Proyectos de Desatro!lo). Laaprobaci6n adierlepoffil\ecoat"iAod"d!ael'eanguerae,fD"etori8o's:r=afiscfa, 'm"eo;usentarfel 'a'recoiOb'irelell'i!nfdoonnelao'co qtie lo dernuestre.
2. Transpareneia sob:h Probletnms de Contaminaci6n:
o Buscoinformesdetaliadossobreproblernasdecontaminaci6rianterioresasociados son el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarm. Especfflcamente, me gustar[a saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, cuffles sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas dGeHlimrrp[iezkaeralsloeg:artLe8mmlasee!uriudad,lcdleolmsueeslor.yldl elauguadWupbuterr6sdAneleal,D/Oad8
3. Menitoreo Ambiental Contffiuo:
.o Propongo eJ estabiecimiento de ui'i pian pra el morfftoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de coristrucci6n y opaaaci6n. Est plan debe detallar c6rno se realizarAelmonitoreo de vaporde suelo daspu6s deca construcci6ne incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan prob!ernas de vapor durante las ptuebas en la etapa de perinxsode construcci6n.Prote@er la salud de los niflos, las poblaciones vulnerables y todog los membros de la comunidad es de mAxima importanoia,
4. Responsabilidad on la Toma de Decisioneg:
o Solicito el establecimianto de uri coxisejo asesor comunitatio que ineluya a residentes, expertos en tnedio ambiente y tuncionat'os h la ciudad paix supervisar ]OS aspectos ambientales de} proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una voz an el rnonitoreo de log itnpactos del pmyecto,
5. La barrera (K Rail) de AdeR}a Ave. perinaneeer& ex su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo Wfico, Levantar la barrera del K probablemente conducirA a u aento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradando a(in rags la calidad del aite, Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad de! aire para comprerider los posibles irnpamos en lasaJud de los residentes. AdemAs, abogo porreaiizar pruebas deniveles de ruido para evaluar log efectos del aumento an el flujo de v&fico y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta ia barrera. Es esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente paraanalizar ems impmtos.
Corffio en que darm a estas preocupgiones !a aterici6n que rnerecen, Firrna
,,75, g, (:20E'5'
Fecha
toj 223
oposxcMi ALPROYF,CTO 10130 ADELLA
a . rneopongoalProyectol€)I30Adella
(el @'Pmyecto"), A continuaci6n, he expuesto migrazones paraoponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes paracoruiderar carribiarmioposici6n:
1. Pruebas Ambientules Exhaustivasx
o Solicito que cl desarrollador rmice una EvaIuaci6n de Irripacto Ambiental (EiA) ee"avaEuamc'i'6vna d'efbees e"veal!'to"'do;&l:mpoensiIbelesOuaelAut'eors 'am'bdi'entaloefsn3ff'in"lci:y'e'm'o'ta calidad del aire, Ia contaminaci6n ac(xstica y los impactos en el trAfico, Creo que el proyecto no deberia calificar wmo exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segkiasecci6n 15332(Clase32-ProyectosdeDesmroilo),Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podr(atener efectos signi&:ativos en ei tr!ffico, ei ruido, lacalidad del aire o la calidadM a@ua,De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir el informe completo que lo dernuestre.
2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaei6n:
o Buscoirdormesdetalladossobreprob}emasdecontantimr6nantertoresaso6iados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordark, Especfficamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pt'uebas se realimrAn, cuAles mxstancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas delimptezaasegurmrAnla seguiidaddei suelo y del a3ua subterrAnea, Dado que el Geo Tracker 110muestra prueffi adicionales realizadas despu6s dei 17/08/2021.
3. Mobatorco Ambiental Continuo:
.o Propongo el estabiecfraiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante jag fanes de conatrucci6n y opet'aci6n, Este plan debei detallar c6mo se tealizgA eirnonitreodevapordeguelo despu6sde laconsuhcci6neincluirplanes decontingancia sisedetedanproblemas devapordurante1!8pruebasenlaetapa de p*rmiso de coristmci6n, Proteger la saiud de los os, las poblaciones vulnerablesy cdos los miembros dela comunidad es de mmmaimpormncia,
4. ResponsabiXidad en la Toma de Decisiones.
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitatio que inoluya a residentes, expertos en medio atnbiente y fmciox'iarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos arxibientales del pmyecto. Esto garantizarA }a rendici6h de euentas y brindatTha108 residentes una voz an el nionitoreo de los impactos del proyecto,
5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permaneeerA en so iugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a mantener el I( rail cerrado a todo trAfico.
Levmtar la barrera del K probablemente conducirA aun autnento on las emisiones de vohfzlos, degradando aGn rods la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la cali*d del aire para comprenderlos posibles impactos en la salud de llo0:reebsidteriostedse,lAad €emlaAlsto,afflbogeol npouJrOrealdexzar!cmOeybapsOrdemnivm niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del rutdo si se levanta la barrera, Es esericiai invo)ucrar a expertos en salud y meio ambientepara mializar estos impactos, Corifio en que dark a estas pteocupaciones laatenci6n que merecen, ,/M
Fecha
2o'7224
orosxcx6s ALPROYECTO ioi.io ADELLA
correspondtentes pga corisiderar cambiar mi oposici(m:
1. Pruehas Arnbientales .Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambientai (EIA) exhuustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizadi Esta evaluaci6n debe evalw todos los posibles efectos ambientaIes, incluyendo la calidad dei aire, IEIconnaci6nactistica y IOSirnpactos en el 'ubfico, Creo que el proyecto ;no deberta caiificar como exento bajo ia Exenct6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segimlasccci6n U332(Ciase32-ProyectosdeDesarrollo), Laaprobaci6n dei proyecto podrfatener efectog mgni&ativosen el trMco, ei ruido, la caiidad del aire o la aa!ibd del ague. De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir cl informe completo
2. Thanmparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6ni
o Busco iriformes detaliados sobre problemasde containinaci6nanterioxes aso6iados son cl sitio deJ proyecto y c6mo se abordm4n, Especfficamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pmebas se realizarAn, cubes sudancias son preocupantes y c6mo jas medidas 3, Monitoreo Ambtental Centinuo:
. o Propongo el establecimianto de uy plan para el rnonitoreo axnbiental continuo dtirante las fases de constriicci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se reaiizarA el monitoreo de vapordesuelo despu6s da ia construcci6n e incluir planes do contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pmbas en la etapa de petmiso de constucci6n. Proteget la sa de los niffos, lag poblacionea vulnerabJes y todos los miembmsde Iacomuntdad es de m importmicia.
4. ResponsaMidad en }a Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito elaestablecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en rnedio ambiente y f'uncionatios de la ciudad para supear 108 aspectos arnbientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y 5rindarA a ios residentes una VO7. eii el monitoreo de los irripactos del proyeeto. 5, La tsarrera K Ran) de Adella Ave. pm'ntanecerA eo su tugar:
o Urjo encarccidamente a la ciudad n manteiter at K rail cerrado a todo tco, Levantar Ia barrera del K probablemente conducffl aun aumento en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradaudo ai mAs la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n iritegral delacaJidarl delaireparaco.ni7enderIosposiblesimpactosenJasaludde los residentes, Adetnb, abogo porrealxzar pruebas demveIes de mdo paraevaluar 103 efectos del aumento en el flujo da bkw y por ctn monitoreo coritinuo de los niveles de contaminaci6n dei aire y del ruido si se ievatita )a ba. Es esencial involucraia a expertos en saiud y medio arnbiente para malizar estos impactos, Conffo en que a estas preocupaciones }a atenci6n que mereeeri, s?g>,7H
Fecha
flo'=J
Fjrma
225
oros:tcx6n ALPROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el"Proyecto"). A cont'inuaci6n, he expuesto mis razonespara -oporiermey fas solicitudes corwspondientes paraconsiderarcambiarmi oposici6n:
1. Pruebus Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador tea}ice una F,valuaci6n de Impacto Arnbientat (EJA) exhausttva antes de que se irnplernente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evalmci6n debe evaiuar todos 108 posibles efgtos ambieintales, inciuyendo la calidad del aire, la contamiriaci6n ac6stica y log irnpactos en ei trAfico. Creo que ei ArEO6eAc,':e"g:arid}eabsee"cc'ai6enalljfi51c3'2("Cmlasoe e3x2':nP'roybaecjotoslade"Dx:s"atr'6o d.e} prooWecOah'o' bpoddrdfaeltenagemrefDecetonsOsHignrtufi?,atimveoscnt!e que Jo demuestre.
2. Transparencta sobre Problemas de Cou'tuxuinaci6no
o Busco iioxmes detaliados sabreproblernas decontamina66n anterjops asociados cori cl sitio delproyecto y c6mo seabordarAn.IEspecffimnente, me gustatia saber (1116pruebasseroalizarm,curiessustanciassonpreocupantesy c6molasmedidas
3. Monitoreo Ambimtal Continuo:
.o Pmpongo el establecimiento do un plan pua el monUoreo ambiental contiauo durante lu fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se reauzarl el monitoreo devaporde suelo desput%de )aconstrucci6n e incluirplanes de contingencia si se detectait problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en Jaetapa de permiso de comtnicci6n.Prote@erla salad de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad esde mAa importangia.
4. Responsabil €dad en la Toma de Deeisiones:
o Solicito el establecirniento de un consejo asesor comunitario que inoluya a residentes, expertos enmedio aml>ientey funcionarios de la ciudad pnra supervisar jos aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendii6n da cuentas y brindarA a10S residentes una voz en el monitorao da 108 impactos del proyecto, & La barrera (K Rail) de AdeJia Ave. permaneeerA en su lugar:
o Uijo encarecidameme a }a ciudad a mantener el K rail certado a todo trAfico.
Levattar la barrerade! K probabjeihente conducir/t auri aurnento en iaa emisiones de vebfculos, degradando ah mas ja caiidad del aire, Solicito una evaluzi6n linOgte,,ptldednetl.a.cAaIdidadelnu,de,IabaiOrge0paracteo,mlpzrael7araxasea'va}"'u"are los efectos del aunzmto en ei Eoujl'o de tr6fico y poz un monitoreo contitiuo de los niveles de contmninaci6n del aire y dei mido si se levanta la barrera, Es esenciai involucrar a expertos en saiud y medio atnbiente para analizar estos tmpactos, Cotdto enque datm a estaspreocupaciones ia atenci6n que merecen. \4z3'
Fech
2C)1 226
OPPOSl'nON TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
Project")Below,Ihave outliried my reasoxisfot opposirig andcorrespontling requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o I requestthat tl'iedeveloperconducta thoinugh Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessrneiit should evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section15332 ((lass 32-DevelopmentalPro,iects).Approval of theproject maxi result in signif'icant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, l would )ike to receive the comprehensive report that liroves the above untiue.
2. Transparency 01% Contamination Issue,g:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with tlie project site and how tliese wi1} be addressed. Speci:fica}ly, I would like to know what tests wili be conducted, which substarices are of conccin, and how clean-up measures wi!I ensure soil and grouiidwater safety. As the Geo Trackcr does not show further testing done after 8/} 7/2021.
3. Ongoing Eavironmental Monitoring:
o l propose the establishntent of a plaii for oiygoing enviromnental monitoring throughorit the constrttctioxi and operationaJ phases, T'his plan should outlirie liow soil vapor moriitoring will be conducted post-construction ancl include contingency pfans if vapor issues are detected during testing at tlie building permit stage, Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utinost impoilance.
4. Aceountability in Decision-Mal6ng:
o I request the estab.tishment of a community adyisory board tliat includes residents, en'vironmcntal experts, aiid city officials to overst'e ffie environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongiy urge the city to keep the K taii ctosed to Elll traffic, Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased velticle emissio'iis, fuitiier degracling air quality. t request a COInprehenSiVeair qualit'} aS!'6SSmellt COullderStand the potential llealth impacts on residents. Additional!y, I advocate for xioise levet testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poflution levels if the lyatrier is rernoyed. Engaging health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
rfrust that you will give these concerns the attention they deserve.
D:j2'l)2a
ldb 227
O.' OS CION AL PROYI".CT0 10130 ADELLA
correspondientcs
Y(eol "14'5;':"), A Lr'tit'n!?/heexpuestomis razonespmaCraOopoollnoermalel)yrolyase &'lh' para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:
1. I'ruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6m de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva axites de que se implcmente cualquicr unidad auton'iatizada, Esta e'valuaci6n debe evaluar todos )os posibles efectos ambientales, inc)uyendo la calidad dcl aire, la contaminaci6n aci'.sstica y los impactos an el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto 'no deber €a cali'ficar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, seBGn la secci6n15332(Clase32 -ProyectosdeDesarrollo).La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos sigx'iificativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustai{a recibir el informe completo que lo dernuestre. 2, Transpurencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de co'i'itaininaci6n anteriores asociados con ei sitio del proyecto y c6mt'i se abordarAn. Especfficamen[e, me gustat{a saber qu6 pruebas se reatizaraii, cuAles sustai':icias soxi preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de Jimpieza asegurarAn la seguri<lad dei suelo y del agua subterrAnea, Dado que el Geo Tracker 220 muestra pruebas adicionales rea!izadas despots del l 7/08/202],
3. Monitoreo Axnbiental Coxitinuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante las .['ases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detai)ar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de yaporde suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir p}anes de coiitingencia si se detectan pr<':iblernas de vapor drirante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los niffos, las pobfaciones vuinerables y todos los miemtiros de !a comcinidad es de maxima iinportancia,
4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o 8oiicito el estable.cimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que inckiya u residentes,expertosenmedio ambientey funcionariosdc la ciudadliara supervisa'r los aspectos ambicntales del proyecto. Esto gararitizarA fa rendici6n de cuentas )7 brindara a 10S residehtes una voz en el rnonitoreo de )os impactos del proyecto.
5. Ln barrera (K Ratl) de Adella Ave. permanecern en su lugar:
o Ur,io ericarecida'tnentea la ciudad a mantenerel K raiJ cerrado a todo trAfico. de
Levantarla barremdel K lirobabtementeconducirAa un aumentoen lasemisiones vehiculos, degradando a<u'x inks la caJidad dei airc. Solicito una e'valuaci6n integral de la calidad de} aire para comprei'ider los posibles impactos en la salcid de los residentcs,Ademb, abogopor reaJizarI.irucbas denivelesdc ruieioparaevaluar los efectos del aumento en el flujo de trffico y por un moniloreo continuo de los niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y dei ruido si se levaiita Ia barrcra. Es esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ainbiente para analimr estos in'ipactos, Conflo en q'ue darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que mcrecen.
Firma
rob 228
OPPOSlTjOiN TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
"Pr5iect")Below,I haveoutlir>edmy reasonsfor opposingandcorrespondingrequeststo consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmentai '['esting:
o l request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmental }mpact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved, Thtsassessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quaiity, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualt'fled as exempt under CEQACategorical Exetnption tinder sectioi'i 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If this is not tme, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency oii Contamination Issues:
o l seek detaiIed reports on pd contamiiiation issues associated with the project site and how these wiil be addressed. Specifically, I would liketo know whattests wiik be conducted, which substariccs are of concern, aid how clean-up measures will ensure soi} and gmtindwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/202].
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishn'ient of a plan for ongoing environmenta} monitoring throughout the construction and operationa! phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wiil be conducted post-constmction and include coiitingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building pertnit stage, Pmtecting tlie health of children, vulnerabIe popu}ations, and al} community members is of utmost in'iportance
4. Accountability in Decision-Makmg:
o I request tl'ie t,stablis'i'irnent of a community advisory board that iacludes residents, enviromnenta! experts, and city officials to oversee the environrnenta) aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRail)torernaininplace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all tiaffic. Removing the K barrier will fikely lead to increased vehicle ernissioris, furtherdegrading air quaiity.
Xrequest a comprehensive air quality assessmeni. to understand the potential health impacts 011 residents. Additionakly, I advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poliution leyels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health aiid en'vironmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential
I 5aust that you will give these concerns tlie attention they deserve. ;F2.l7-"tj2h'
2tO 229
OPPOSITION TO 10130ADELLA PROJECI'
changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o l request tl'iat tlie developer conduct a thorough Environmental In"ipact Assessment (EJA) before the Project is approved, Tliis assessment sliou?d evaluate all potential environn'>ental effects, including air quality, iioise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qrialified as exeinpt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project niay result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. lf this is not true, l worild like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.
2. 'rransparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contan'iination issues associated witli tl'ie project site aiid how tl'iese wilJ be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducled, which sulistanc.es are of concem, and how clean-up measures wil} ensurc soil and groundwater safety. As the Oco Tracker does not sihow fiuther testing done after 8/) 7/202 1.
3. Ongotng Environnientsi} Monitoring:
o l propose the establisliment of a plan for oi'i@oing environment:atmonitoring througliout tlie construction and operational phases. This plai"i sbould outline Jiow soil mpor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include conlingericy plaiis if vapor issues are detected duaing testing at the buiiding peri'iiit stage.
Protecting the ltealth of cliildren, vulnerable poliulatirms, and all coit'imunity members is oful>'riost irnportttnce.
4. Accottnlaliility ibi l)ecisioix-Making:
o I request the establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental exper(s, and city oflicials to oversee lhe environn'ienta) aspects of the prqject. Tliis will ensure accounability aiid provide residents with a voice in n'ionitoring the projecls impsicts.
5. Adellit Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to rennain in place:
o } strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality, I request a comprehensive air quality assessment lo ui<ierstiuid the potential liealth inipactsonresidents.Additionally,Iadvocate for noiselevel testin@ to eva!uatetbe effects of iiicreased traffic flow aiid for ot'igoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels i[" the barrier is removed. Engagirig healtli and environmental experts to aiialyz.e tliese impacts is essential,
l trrist that you wil! giye these co'itcerns tlie attention tl'iey deserve- ?,,-2'/ '2jS
l)ate:
2tt 230
OPPOSI'j'lON TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
Prqiect") Below, I have outtined my reasons for opposing arid corresponding requcsts to consider changing my opposition:
1. Coniprehensive Enviroximentiil Testing:
o IrequestthatthedesreloperconductathoroughBnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EiA) before the Project is approved. Tl'iis assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pol)utiori> anc! traffic impacts. l believe that the project should not be quali[ied as exempt under CF,QA Categorica! Exemption under sectiori 153]2 (Class 32-Developn'ien'[aJ Projects). Approval of the project mayresult in significant effects relatin@ to traaffic, noise, aiy quality, or water qriakit'y. If (his is riot true, I would it!ce to receive the comprehensiye report tl':iatproves theabove untrue.
2, Traxtsparency on Contamination ISsues:
o } seek detailed reports ori past contamination ISSUESassociated with the project site aiid how these will be addressed. Speci'i-ical)yj would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and l'iow clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sliow further testin@doiie after 8//17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishineiit or a plan for ongoing eiwironmental monitorii'ig througlxout the construction and operational pliases. This plaii sl"iould outline how soil vapor monitoring will leeconducted post-construction and include contingency plansif vaporissucsaredetecteddi.tring testingat the buildingpermitstaze.
J)rotecting tkie health of children, vulnerable popu}ations, and all community members is of utmost importance
4, Aecouritability in Decision-Making:
o l request the establislm"ient of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officiafs to oversee the environmentat aspects of tlie project, 'I'his will ensure accounlabilily and provide residents with a voice in n"ionitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adel}a Ave. Coxicrele Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o } strongly rirge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to ixicreased veliicle emissions, furtlier degrading air quality.
I requcst a coinprehensi've air quality assessmei'it to understand the potential health impacts on residents, AdditionalJy, l advocate 'for noise )evel testing to evaluate the effects of iiicreased traffic flow arid for ongoiug monitoring of air aiid noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging lieakth and environmental experts to analyze tliesc impacts is essential
cerns l1'ie attemion tliey deserve.
"Sll2,{?5
'2a:p 231
OPOSJCION AL PROYE(.:TO 10130 ADELI.,A
correspondienl:es para consiclerar eairibiar mi oposici6n:
I. 'Pruebas Atnbientates Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarro!tador rcalice una E'valuaci6n de I'inpacto Arnbiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se impJemente cua!quier unidad autornatizadu. Esta evaluaci6ri debe evaluar todcs ios posibles efectos ambientales, inclxiyendo ia calidad del aire, lacontaminaci6n ac6sticay !os impactos en el h:Afico- Cxeo quc el proyccto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Bxenci6n Categ6rica da la CBQA,segun lasecci6nl5332(Clase32- Proyectosde Desmrolto). Laaprobaci6n dei proyecto podrtatener efectos significativos an eltrafico, el ruido, la calidad dei aire o la calidad deJ agua. De no scr asf, me gustarJa recibir e! 4nforme completo que lo den'iuestre.
2, Transparencia solyre Probtemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco 'nifotmes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n miteriores asociados con el sitio de} proyccto )i c6n:io se abordar6n- Especificainente, me gustaiaia saber qu6 prueL+as se rea!izarii, cuaJes sustancias son ptcocupantes y c6mo ias medidas de tin'ipie'z"a asegtirarAn la seguridad dcl suclo y del agua subterrAnca. 'Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales rea!izadas despu6s del l 7/08/2021,
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o I)ropongo el e..titabiecimxcnlo de un plait para el monitoreo ariibicntal continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan dcbe detallaia c6mo se realizarA cl monitorm de va.por de suclo despu6s de laconstnicci6n e incluir p}aiies de contingcncia si se detectan prob4emas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permisn de conslrucci6n. Proteger la salud de los ninos, )as poblaciones vu)nerab}es y todos k'lS iniembros da la comui'iidad es de rnAxirna inipotcia. 4, Responsabilitlad en la Toma da Decisiones:
o Solicito el estabiccimiento de un coriscjo asesor comunitario que iiic}uya a residentcs, expertos en medio ariybiente y funcioixarios de ta ciudacl para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garatttizar& la reridici6n de cuentas y brindait a !os residentes una VOZ en el monitoreo de ios impactos dek proyecto.
5. La bsrrera (K Raif) de Adeila Ave. permaneeorA en su lugar:
o ?.Jrjo encare,cidaniente a la ciudad a mantener cl K rail ceiiaado a todo trAfico.
J,evantar la barrera del K probabien'iente conducirA a un aumento en lag en'iisiones r!e vehiculos, degiadando atin rnAs la ca)idad del airc. Solicito una evaluaci6ii integral de ta calidud del aire pga comprender los posibies impactos en la salud de los residentes.AdernAs,alzoBo porrea)izar prue.bas de niveles de iuidt:i para e'vaiuar los efectosde) aumentoen el flu3octetrtfico y por un monitoreo continuo de tos niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y dei ruido si se lcvanla la bai'rera. F,s esencia[ involucrar a expeitos en salud y mcdio arnbiente para nnatizar cstos in'ipactos.
Confio en que darAn a estas preocupacioi'ies la atenci6n que rnerecen. 4Ftla4..z:'0"&444/.(:vi
lt'3= 232
01)POSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
Project") Beiow, [ have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
]. Comprehensive EnvironmentaE Testing:
o I request tbat the developer conduct a thorough F,nvironmental kmpact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment shoukd eva!uate all potential envirorimental effects, including air quality, noise pollutiori, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt inder CHQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of tlie project may result in significant effects relating to tra:Jlic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not tnie, I wouid like tO receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.
2. I'ransparency on Contamination Issues:
o l seek detailed reports on past contarninatron issues associated with the project site aitd how these wiil lee addressed. Specifically, r would like to know what tests witl be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done afier 8/17/202 I.
3. Ongoing Envjronmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for origoirig envirom'nental monitoring throughout the construction arid operationai p}'iases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and inctude contingency pians if mpor issues are detected during testin@ at the building peimit stage.
Protecting the liealth of chi!dren, yu}nerable populations, and all community members is of utmost impoxtance.
4. AecountalyiJi7 in Decisioxi-Making:
o } request the establishinent oiaacommunity advisory board that includcs residents, em;ironmental experts, and city officials (o oversee the envirotirnental aspects of the project. This will ensure acccuntabi €ity and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adel}a Ave. Concrete Bararier (K Rail) to remain iai place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to a'il traffic. Rernoving the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air qua!ity, [request a comprehensi've air quality assessment to understand ttie potentiai health impacts on residents. Additional!y, l advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is rerrioved. Engaging health and environn'iental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
fhvst that you wi!It ziye theseconcerns the attet'.tion they deserve. s!8h2'
?, - 2. Y - 25'
Date:
233
OPPOSITJON TO 10J30 ADELLA PROJECT
r C Y : "s -!- !1 n Di s (%r s ars am opposing ihe 10130 Adella Project (the "Project") Below, 1 tiave outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changin@ my opposition:
1, Comprehensive Famronmental Testing:
o l requeSt thatthe developerCOnduCt a tb0mu8h EnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaiuate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise polMion, and traffic impacts. T believe that the project should riot be qualified as exempt under C'QA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Appro'val of the project may resuit in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Jf this is not true, S would like to receive the comprehensiye report that proves the above untrue.
2. '['ransparency on Contamination Issues:
o } seek detailed repotts on past contarnination issues associated with the project site and liow these wil] be addressed. Specifically, f would like to la'iow what tests wil! be conducted, which substances are of concen'i, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose tlie establishment of a plaii for ongoing environmental monitoring ttiroughout the construction and operational phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor rnonitorinB witl becoi'iducted post-construction andinclude contingency plans if 'vapor iss'ites are detected during testing at the. building perrnit stage, Proecting the health of cliildren, vulnerable populations, and all community members 18 0f tltmOS7 lrnpOrlallCe
4. Aecountabili(y in Decision-Makiiig;
o I request the establishinent of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmenta! experts, and city officials to oversee tl'ie environmental aspccts of the project. This will ensure accountabi)ily and provide resider:its with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts,
5, Adella Ave, Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to alJ tmfBc. Rernoving the K barrier will Jikely lead to increased veicle emissions, further degradiug air quality, I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health in'ipactsonresidents.Additionally,Iadvocate for noiselevel testingto evalu@tethe effects of increased traf[ic flow and l-or ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging healtli and environmental experts to analyze tliese impacts is essential.
l trust that you will give tliese concerns the attcntioxi they deserve.
Signatufe
g/p!/ hs'
Date:
2t5 234
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
I lq6 r @ r *rs /% am opposingthe 10130Adella Project (the Project") Below, l have outlined my reasons for opposing and correspondingrequests to consider changing my opposition:
L. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o '[request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmental Impact Assessment (E4A) before the Proje,cl is appmved. This assessment should evaluate al] potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise potlution, and taffic impacts. l believe tliat the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Dcveiopmental Projects). Appro'val of the project may resuit in signiiicant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would lme to recei've tJhe comprehensive report that proves the above untrue,
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o t seek detailed reports on past contamiiation issiies associated with the project site and how these will be addressed Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substarices are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show fuither testing.done after 8/1 7/2021.
3, Ongoing Environmemal Monitoring:
o I propose the cstablishmetu of a plan for ongoing en'vironinental monitoring througliout the coristruction and operational pliases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contixigency plans if vapor issues are detected during, testing at the building permit stage.
Protectin@ the ticalth of children, vulnerablc populations, and all community rnembers is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability in I)ecision-Making:
o I request the establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environtnenta! experts, and city officials to oversee tl'ie environmental aspects of the project. This wii!l ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adella j'*ve. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o 'f strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Retnoving the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quatity. [ request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understaiid the potential hcalth impactsonresidents.Additionally,Iadvocate for noiselevel testingto evaluatethe effects of increased traffic flow aiid for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution le'vels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmentai experts to analyze these impacts is essential
Itrust tliat you will give these concerns thc mtention they deserve. s,,y!lurre,..!fm,4,,(- "3-2t4-2,3'
Dat.e:
21(f 235
01)POSITION TO 20130 ADELLA PROJECT
Project") Below, I have 6utlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider chaiiging my opposition:
L Comprehensive Environmental Testtng:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathorougliEnyironmentallmpactAssessmem (EJA) before the Project is approved. I'his assessment should evaiuate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. l beiieye that tlxe project shouJ.dnot be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approva] of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, atr quality, or water quality. If this is not true, X would like to receive the comprehensive report tl'iat proves thc above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detai!ed reports on past coritamination issues associated with the project site and how these wili be addressed. SpecificalIy, l would like to know what tests will be conducted, w)'iich substances are of concern, and liow clean-up measures will ensurc soil and @rounclwater saf'ety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/1 7/2021
3. Ongoiug Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establistu'iient of a pb.u"i for ongoirig environmental rnoxiitoting throughout the construction and opcrational phases. Tliis plan sliould outline how soil vapormonitoring wilJ be conducted post-constructioii and include contingency plans if vapor issues arc detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the health of chil<tren, vulnerable populations, and al) community members is of utmost ii'itpoitance
4. Accountability in Decision-.!Vlaking:
o l request the establishmerit of a community advisoiy board tl"iat includes residents, environrncntal experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This syi}! ei'isure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring tlte pro,iect'simpacts.
5. Adella Aye. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rait c!osed to all traffic. Removing the K kiarrier will likely iead to increased ve}iicfe emissions, fuither degrading air quaiity.
I request a compreliensive air quality assessment to understand tlie potential health impacts on residents. Additionally,Iadvocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution leve)s if the bairier is removed. Engaging heaJtb and envirotunental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
Itrust that you will give these concerns the attention they deserve. (lJi-r+- bs/zq/>.(
Signature Date:
lil 236
OPPOSIT JON TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
Projeci") Below, I have outlined m'yhaeasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Coniprehenstve Environinental Testing:
0 l request that the developer conduct a thorough En'vironmental trnpact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmerital eiIects, including air quafity, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. T believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under secljon )5332 (Class 32-Developmental I)rojects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water qiiality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the compreliensive report that proves the above cmtrue.
2. Transparency on Conta'mination Issues:
o r seek detaiied reports oti past contamination issues associated ivith the project site and how these will be addressed. Specif'ically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Gco Traeker does not show further testirig done after 8/17f202L
3. Ongoing Environmenta) Monitoring:
o J propose the estabiishment of a plan for ongoing envimnmental monitoring tltroughout the canstructiori and operational phases. This plan shoutd outline how soil vapor monitoring wi!l be conducted post-constructton ai'>dinclude contingency ptans if mpot issues are detected duiing testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the health of children, vulnerabte. populations, and all comxminity members is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability in i)ecision-Malang:
o l request the estab]isbmeiit of a c.ornrnunity advisory board that includes residents, erivirorimental experts, arid city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. Tliis wil} ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts,
5, AdcS]a Ave. Concrete Bai'rier (K Rail) to rexnain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to kecp the K rail closed to all traffic, Removing tlie K barrier wi)] likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quatity.
I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impactsonresidents-Additional)y,Iadvocatefor noiseleveltestingto evaI4te tbe effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing n'ionitoring of air and noise polhition levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging hca]th and environmenta) experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
I trust that you wi}l give these concems the attention they descrve.
Anature Date: 3h!-(/ 25--
2-y(b 237
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADKLI,A PROJECT
Project") Below, I have outlined my rcasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Compreliensivc Environmental Testing:
o r request that the developer conduct a (borough Environmental Impact Assessment (BIA) beforetheProiectis apptoved.This assessmentsliou!devacuateall potential environinental effects, including, air qua)ity, xioise pollution, and traf& impacts. } believe that the pro.iectshouldnot bequalified asexen'ipt underCBQA Categorical Exernption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmeittai Projects). Approval of the pro.lectma)iresultin significant effectsrelating to traffic, noise,air quality, or water quality. If this is not tiaue, [ would like to receive the comprehensiye report tliat proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o r seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site ttnd how these will be addressed. Specificaily, T would like to know what tests will be conducted, wl'iicb substances are of concern, and how cleait-tip measires will ensuresoil and @roundwater safety,AS tlie Geo Tracker doesnot sliow further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental nxonitoring throughout the constntction ai'id operational phases. This plari shorild outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction aitd include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the liea)th of cliildren, vulnerable populations, and all conununity members is of utmost impor(:ance.
4. Accountability in Decision-Malcing:
o r request the establishment of a coinmunity advisory board tliat includes residents, erivironmerital expeits, and city officials to oversee tlie environmental aspects of tlie project. This will ensure accountability and provide resicients with a voice in monitoring tlie project's i:inpacts.
5. Adelb Ave. Concrete Barrter (K Rajl) to remain in placei o l strong,lyrude the city to keep the K rail closed to ali tmff-rc.Removing the K barrier will likely fead to increascd vehicle emissions, J.aurtlier degrading air quality, T request a coi'iiprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impactsoriresidents.Additionally, kadvocatefor noiselevel testin@to evaluatetlie effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing nionitoring of air and noise pollution leyels if tl'ie barrier is removed. Engaging healtli tuict envii'onmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
r mist that 70Ll wiil give theseconcernstheattentionthey dcservc.
Signature
-(] E -,,1'! -A02.5
Date:
ltq 238
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLAPROJF,CT
Project") Be]ow, I have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Compreliensive F,nvironniental Testing:
(:= I request that the deve!Oper CCmduct a thorough EnVirOnmental Impart ASSessment (:ElA) before the :Project is approved. This assessment should evaiuate all potentia} environmema} effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project shouid not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption i.inder section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of the project may resuit in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or svater quality, If this is not true, l wouU like to receive the comprehensive repoit tliat proves tlie above untrue,
2. Transparency on Containination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with tl'ie project site and how these will be addressed. Specificaily, 1 would like to know what tests wifl be conducted, whicli substances are of concern, and how cleari-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/1 7/2021
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the canslruclion and operational phases. This plan should outline how soii vapormonitoring will be conducted post-coristruction and inckudc coniingency plans if vapor ISSUES are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the hcalth of cliildren, vulnerable populations, and all community memtiers is of utmost impoxtance
4. Accountabilffy in Decision-Malcing:
o I request 'the establishxnent of a community advisoiy board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmentaf aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in mor'iitoriug the project's impacts.
5. AdeJia Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Retnoving the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality. 1 request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impactsonresidents.Additional!yi [ advocatefor noiseJeveltestingto evaluatetlie effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution ieve)s if the t>arrier is ren'ioved. Engaging health aixd environn'ientai experts to ai'ialyze tliese impacts is essential,
Itrt,ist tliax you will give tiiese concerns the attention tliey deserve. ;('Sl%p l-'%,
Signature
l,;
Date:
120 239
OPPOSJTION TO 10230 ADELLA PROJECT
Project") Below, I have orrf.lined my reasons for opposiirg axtd correspondiiig requests to consider changii'ig my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmentaj Testing:
o Irequestthatthedeveloperconductathorougl'iEnvironmentalImpactAssessment (ETA) before the Project is approved. This assessment sltould evahiate al! potential environmenta)effects,includirig air quality, noise lio)lution, and traffic impacts. [ believe that tl'ie project should not be qualified aS exei'i'ipt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under sectioxi 15332 (Class 32-Developn'iental Projec(s), Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quakity. If tliis is not true, } woxdd like to receiye tlie con"iprehensiye report tl'iat proves lie above untrue.
2. Transparency on Cont>imination issues:
0 I seekdetailedREPORTSall pastcontaniinationissues associated witli tlie project site and liow (hese wiifi be addressed. Specif-xcally,Jwould like to know uihat tests will be conducted, whicli substances arc of concern, and how cieaii-up measures will ensure soil and groundwa[er safety, As tlie Geo Tracker does not SlThOWfur(her testing done after 8/17/2021.
3, Ongotxig Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the estabJishnient of a pian for ongoii'ig environmentai n'ionitoring througl'iout the construct.ioi'i ai"id operational pliases. This plan shouR1 outline liow soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction artd include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting tlie health of childreii, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost impoilaxxce.
4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o } request the establishment of a conymunity acivisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city oft-rcia)s to overscc thc environn'ienta) aspects of thc project. This WITSensure accountabil.ity ai'id provide residents with a voice in n'ionitoring tlic project's irnpacts.
5. AdeJJa Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Raii) to remain in place:
o l strongty urge the city to keep tlie K rail closed to all trafl-ic. Rcmoving tlie K barrier wili likely €ead to increased vehicle emissions, fuitlier degradirig air qualit)i. }request a con'iprel'icnsive air quality assessment to undersCarid t)ie potentiaJ health iinpacts on residents. Additionally,I advocate for noise level testing to e'vaiuate t}ie effects of increased traffic flmv aiid for ongoin@ monitoring of air a.ii<l noise pouution )evets if the baiarier is removexi. Engaging tiea!tl'i and enyironnaiental expcxts to analyze these impacts is essential.
Itrust tl'iat you will give these conceri'is tl'xeattention they <teser've.
Sicnature Date
'2,rt 240
IMm:P
"Project") Below, r have
changing tny opposition:
ON TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
M'07,- arnopposing the lOl30Adella Project(the
my reasoiisfot opposingandcorresporidin@ requests to consider
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o I request that the de'veloper conduct a thorough Eiivironmental ImpactAssessrnent (EIA) before the Project is approved, This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, incJuding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorica} Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta] Projects). Approval of the project may resuIt in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, Or water quality. If this is not true, l would like to receive tlie comprehensive report tliat proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o s seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated witli the project site and how tliese will be addresscd. Specificatly, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, wliich substarices are of concern, aiid how clean-up measures will eiisure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testii'ig done after 8/17/202i
3. OngoingEnvironmentalMonitoring:
o 1 propose the establishn'ient of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the constmction and operational phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issiies are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the health of chi)dren, vulnerable populations, and aiJ community members is of utmost importance.
4, -Accountability in Decision-Making:
0 I request the establishment of a community advisory board tliat includes residei'its, envirorirnental experts, and city officiais to oversee the enviroximental aspects of the project. This wi}} ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoiing the project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave, Concrete Barrier (K Raij) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep tlie K rail cloxd to all traffic. Removing the K barrierwill }iJcely lead to increased vehicle emissions, firther degrading; air quality, k request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionatly,Iadvocate for noise Jevel testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow aiid for ongoiiig monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging healtl'i and environmental expeits to analyze these impacts is essentiaL
I that you ' give these coricerns the attention they deserve, Signaf.'t.ue Date:
241
OPPOSITION TO lOi30 ADELLA PROJECT
I ( S llne 'l an'(,Z am opposingthe 10130Adella Project(the changing my opposition:
1. Comnreltensive Compreltensive Environmental Testing:
o I request that ihe developer conduct a thorough Environmental Impact Assesstnent (EIA) before the Project is approyed. This assessment shoutd evaluate all potential environmentaJeffec(s,includinB air quality, noisepo}lulion, andtraffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qua!ified as exempt under CEQA Categoricat Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the proiect may resultin significant effectsrelating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quaiity, If tbis is not tnie, I would like to receive the comprehensive repoi-t that proves the above untme.
2, Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated witli the project site and liow these wi[I be addressed. Specifically, I would !ike to know what tests wirl be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. AS the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/t7/202L
3. Oiigoing Environmental Monitoring:
o 1 propose the establishmentof a plan for onHoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases. This pIan should outlixie how soik 'vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency pians if vapor issuesare detecteddurin@ testii'i@ at the building permit stage, Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community membets is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability in Decision-MalThng:
o Srequest the establishment of a community advisory lroard that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the erxvironmentat aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and providc residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adelia Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge t!ie city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier wiil likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality.
I request a comprehensive air quality assessment (o understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additiox'iaJ}y, I advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increasedtraffic flow and for on@oing n'ionitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the lraxiier is removed. Hngaging )tea!th and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
I trust that you will give these c,oncerns the attention they deserve, 51'z4/z(
Date:
242
01)I)OSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJEC'f
I T)6J (Yri.r<'r.A ant opposingthe 10130AdelJaPrci3ect(the "Project") Below, l liave outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1, Comprehensive Enviroximental Testing:
9! J request tl'iat tlie developer conducl a thorough Environinental Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate atl potemial environmental effects, ii'icludirig air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CHQA Categorica) Exemption under sect'ion 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may resul( in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tliis is not true, I woultl like to receive the compreltensive report that proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issties:
@ T seek detailed repoits on past contamination issues associated xiith the pro.ject site and how tliese will lie addressed. Specifically, I would like to kllOW what tests wil? be conducted, wihicl't substtmces are of concern, and how cieaii'up measures will ensure soi) and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17!2021.
3. Ongotng Envtroumental Monitoring:
* } propose tlie estalilishment of a plan for ongoing environmen(al monitoring tliroughoxit tbe construction and operational phases. This plan sbould outline how soil vapor monitoring wig} be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detectedduring testin@at the buiiding pexmit stage.
Protecting the health of children, vu)nerab!e populations, and all commun'ity members is of utmost impoitance.
4. Accountability in Decision-Mak:uig:
* Trequest the esttibiisl'unent of a comn"iunity advisoiy board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmentn} aspects of the projec(. This will enstre accotintability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adel!a Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
-* I strongly irge tlte city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barricr will likely lead lo increased vehicle emissions, further degrading itir quality.
Irequest a comprehensi'vc air qualify assessment to understand the potential healtli impacts on residents, Additionally, I advocate for noise level testing to evakiate the effects of increased trafI'ic flow cuid for ongoing moiiitoring of ir anti noise pollution levels if tl'ie barrier is removed. Engaging health arid eiivironmental experts to analyze tliese impacts is essential.
I trust That yori will give tltese concerns the attention they deserve. g/tq/ :2<"
Date:
243
fOP(,I(2FPOYECTOlOl30ADELLA
(el "Pfoyffli6 '). A coi'itinuaci6n, be 6xprrebto mis razones para 6poi-xerme y ras solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Am'Jyientales Exhausti'vas:
o Soticito que el desarrollaclor realice una Evahiaci6n de Tmpacto Ambierxta? (BIA) exhaustiva a+'ites de qrie se implemente cuaiquier unidad automatizada. Hsta evalriaci6n debe eviuar todos loS posibles cfectos ambieritales, incluyendo la catidad del aire, la contaminaci6n actxstica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el pro)iecto xio deberia ca}ificar como exento liajo }a Exenci6n Categ6rica de fa CEQA, seg*nlasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). Laaprobaci6n dcl proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el trffico, cl ruitto, ]a calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De 110ser asi, nie gustaiafa recibir el informe completo que lo dcmuestre.
2. Transparencia solire Problenias de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problen'ias de contax'iiixiaci6n ai'ileriores asociados con el sitio del proyccto )i c6n'io se abordarAn. Especificamente. me gustaria saber qu6 prucbas se realizar*n, cuAles sustancias sors preocupantes y C61110las medidas de Jiinpieza aseguraran la seguridad del s'itelo y del agua subtemtnea. l)ado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruetias adicionales realizadus desputas del 17/0&"2021.
3. Monitorco Ambiental Contixnio:
o l)ropongo el esiablecimiento da un plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de conslricci6ri y operaci6n, Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo dcspu6s cle la construcci6n e incluir plaxies de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en Ia etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Pmteger }a salud de os nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos Ios miembros de la comunidad es de mAxiina iu'xportancia. 4, Responsabiljdad en bi Tomii de Decisioncs:
o Solicito ej establecimiento de rin consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en n'iedio ambiente y funcionarios da Ia ciudad para supervisaia 108 aspectos ambientaJes del proyecto. E.sto garantizarA la renclici6n de cuentas y brit'idarA a ]os residentes iiia sioz en el monitorco de los impactos del proyccto.
5. Ln barrera (K Rail) de Adel}a Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Uijo encareci<lamente a la ciudad a mantener e] K rai) cerrado a totlo trafico.
Levantar ia barrera del K probablemente conducira a un aumento en las emisioiies de vehiculos, dcgradhtndo akin m.4s la caIlidad del aire, Solicito una evaluaci6n integrul de la calidact del airc para comprender los posibles irrtpactos en la saiud dc los residentes. Adam's, abogo por realizar pruebas cie niveles de ianido para evaluar los cfectos del acimentoen el fluio de tr6fico y pot i.in monitoreo continuo de 108 niveles de contan'iinaci6n de) aire y de) iauido si se fevanta !a barreiaa. Es esencia! invoiucrar a cxpertos en salud y medio ambiente para ana!izar estos impactos.
Confio en que darAn
dso4
244
OPPOSI'l'JON TO iOl30 ADEI,J,A PROJECT
iJgg+k-6src:qamopposingti'ieioizohaeiiapro3ect(the
"Project") Below,l liaye outlined my rcasorisfor opposin@ andcorrespondingrequeststo consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o I request tliat tJ'ie developer conduct a thorougli Environmental Impact Assessment (EJA) before the Project is approved. This assesmnent should cvaluate Elll potentia! environmental effccts, including air quality, noise poJiution, ax'id traffic impacts. I believe that tlie project should iiot be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorica) Exen'iption under section 15332 (Class 32-De'velopmeiital Projects). -Approyal or the prqject may result in significant effects relating to trat'fic, noise, air quality, or wiater quality, ff tliis is not trrie, l would like to receive the compreher'isive report that provcs the above cmtrue.
2. Transparency on Contamiriiilton Issues:
o I seekdetailedrepoitson pastcontaininationissues associated with the prqiect site and laiow tliese will be addressed. Specifically,Iwou)d like to know what tests wiii be conducted, wliich substances are of conceii'i, and hoyv clea*i-up measures win ensure soil arid grotuidwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further tesing done after 8!17/2021.
3. Ongoing F,nvironmenta! Moriitoring:
o l propose the estabiisliment of a plan for ongoing environmentat monitoring tl'irougliout the constryiction and operatiorial pliases. This plan should ouUine how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-c.onsti'uctioi'y and include contingency plans if val:'ior issuesaiaedetecteddtiring testing at tlie building I:iermit stage, Protecting die l'ieaith of ciiildi'en, vulnerable populations, aivd all community menibers is of utmost impoilaiice.
4. Accountability ixi Decision-Miiking:
o Irequestt!ieestalilislunentof:"acomnutnityadvisoiayboaiadthatii'icludesresiderits, environmeiital experts, and city officials to oversee the enyatronmentai aspects of t}re projec(. This wikl ensure accountability and provide residents witli a voice in monitoring the pro,ject's impacts.
5, Adella Ave. Concrete Barrjcr (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rai) closed to al} traffic. Rcmoving tl'te K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle erriissions, fur(her degrading air qriality. l request a comprehensive air quality asscssmeiit to un<lerstancl the potential health irnpacts 071 residents. Additionally, I yidvocate for noise level testing to evaluate tlie effects of increased traffic flow aitd for ongoiixg rnoiiitoring of air aixd noise polkution levels if the bairier is reinoved. Hngaging lieaJtli and envirc:inmental experts to analyze these in'ipacts is essential.
Signature Date:
,-,'?" ,.2)-
'22(/ 245
OPPOSITION TO 20130 ADELLA PRO,TECT
{ l} 0 (aS h '2 r C :q... am opposing the 10130 Adella Projcct (the Project") Be'low, l have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponeling requests to coiisider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmenta) Testixig:
o I request tl'iat the developer conduct a thorough Environmental In"ipact Assessment (EI A) before tlie I%ject is appro'ved. This assessment should evaluate all potentiat en'vironmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, J beilieve that tbe prqjcct should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developnientak Projects), Approvaj of the project may result in significant effects re}ating to traffic, noise, air quakity, or water quality. ff tliis is taiottrue, I would !ike to receive tlie comprehensive report that proves tlie aboye untrue.
2. Transparency on Comamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project si(e and how tbese wil} be addressed. SpecificaJly,lworild like to know what tests will tie conducted, whicl'i subs(ances are of cot'icern, and how cteaii-up measures wili ensure soil and groundwater safety. AS the Geo Tracker does not sliow further testing done a:t'ter8/17/2021.
3, Ongoing Environmentstl Monitoring:
o L I.iropose the establislunent of a plax'i for ongoing environrnentai monitoring throughout tlie construction arid operationa) pl'iases. I'his plai'i sl'iould outline IIOW soil valior monitoring witl be conducted post-coristruction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at tlic building permit. stage.
Protecting the health of cl'iiklren, vulnerable popu)ations, and a)] commtinity me.mbers is of utmost importance.
4. Account:abiJity in Decisioxi-Making:
o } request iite establishruent ofa community advisory board tliat includes residents, enviromnea'ital experts, and city officials to oversee tl'ie environrnental aspects of tbe pro.ject. Tliis will ensure accountabili(y and provide residents witli a voice in monitoring theliro,iect's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Cmicrete Bi'iriier (K Riiil) to rexnain in place:
o 1 strongty urge tt'ie city to keep the T( rai) cJosed tO all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likeiy legl to increase<] vehicle emissions, furtlier degrading airquality.
I request a comlirehensive air quality assessmet'ttto uncferstand tlie potemia) heatth impactson residents.AdditiorialJy,kadvocatefor noiselevel testinzto eyaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air aiqd noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Hngaging health buid environmental experts to axialyzc ti'iese in'ipacts is essential,
Ltx'ust that you wilt give these concerns tbc attention they cteserve, Sig'mAture Date:lct{pr
l'l,-'7 246
OPPOSITTON TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
Project") Below, l have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changixig my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o [rcquestthatthedeveloperconductatlioroughEnvironrnentaJImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessinent should evaluate all potential environmentaJ effects, including air quaiity, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. r believe that the project shouid not be qciatified as exeinpt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmentai Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive repoit that proves the above urtrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on pas( contamination issues associated witb thc project site and how tliese will be addressed. Spccificaily, l would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of coxicern, and liow clean-up measures will ensure soii and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/202 1.
3. Ongoing Enviroiimental Monitoring:
o l propose the establisliment of a plan for on@oing environmental monitoring througliout the construction and operationat phases. This plan sliould outline how soil yapor monitoring wiH be conducted post-constructionand include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected dtring testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the hcalth of cbildren, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance.
4, Accountability in I)ecision-Making:
o I request the establishment of a community advisory board that inctudes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to o'versee tlie environmental aspects of the project. 'rhis will ensure accountability attd provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5, Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to rentain tri peace:
o I strorrgly ui:ge the city to keep the K raik closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will 2ikely lead to increased vehicle emissioxis, further degrading air quality.
I request a comprehensive air quaiity assessment to understand the potential liealtl'i impacts on residents. Additionally,Iadvocate for noise level testing to evatuate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poltution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmental experts to ana(yze these impacts is essential
{ trust that you wit} give these cot'icerns the attention they deserve. -,7,
Signature
3/ 2l/ / 2o z,1
Dare:
247
Ol'l)OSJTION TO 10130 ADF,LLA PROJECT
clianging my opposition:
1. Compreltensive Comnreltensive Environmentnl Environmentxil Testing: Testin 0 I request that the developer COllduCta thorough Enviroximenta) Impact ASSeSSfnent (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all pote,ntiat enviroiunental effects, incltiding air quality, noise po)lution, and traffic impacts. l believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating (o traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. if tl'iis is not true, I would like to receiye the comprehensive repoit that proves the above uitrue.
2. Trayisparettcy on Contanxinatiou Issues:
o T,seek detailed reports ori past contamination iSsues associated with the project site and howthese will be addressed. Specifically,Iwould like to know wha( tests wilt be conduc(ed, whicli sulistances are of concern, and how cleat'i-up measures will ensure soil and grocmdwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring tlirougliout the construction and operational phases. This plan sl'iould outline 110W soil vapormonitoring will be conducted post-constn'iction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building pcrtnil stage, Protecting the health of chiidren, vulnerable populations, and at) community members is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability in Decision-Mal<ing;
o I request the establishinent of a comminity advisory boaiadthat includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the cn'vironmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability aiid provide residents with a voice in monitoring the projectas impacts.
5, Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in pjace:
o T strongiy urge tl'ie city to keep the K rail closed to a)l traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely leadto increased vehictc emissions, firther degrading air quality, I request a comprehensive air quali'['y assessment to 'iuxderstand the potential health impacs on residents. Additionally, } ad'vocate for i'ioise level testing to evacuate the etTects of ixicreased trtiffic flow aixd for ongoing monitoring of air and noise polluiioi'i levels if tlie barrier is removed, Engaging liealth axid environmental expexts to analyze lliese impacts is essential.
Itrus( tlxat )roll win giye tliese concerns the attention tliey deser've.
Sig---t-ff'!' Da!e
1'2!1 248
OPPOSITION TO 10230 ADELLA PROJECI'
I 7,z 6gha [2<0%"' iiii alll opposing the 10130Adella Pro;ject(the "Project") Below, I have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider cbaitging my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environniental Testing:
c I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmental lmpact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment shouJd evakuate all potentia} environmental effects, includirig air quality, noise pollution, and traffic it'npacts, l believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorica) Exen'iption under section J5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in sigt'iificant effects relating to traffic, noise, air qia}ity, or water qua)ity. if this is not true, I wouid like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untnie.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detaiied reports on past contamination issues associa(ed wifh the project site aiid iiow these will be addressed. SpecificaJl)i, I would like to kiiow what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soif aiid grormdwater sai'ety, As tlie Geo Tracker does not show further testiiig doiie after 8/1 7/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
0 f propose tlie establishment of a pJan for ongoing environmental monitoiing throughorit the coristruction and operationa) pliases. This plan should outline how soil vapor moni(oring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the liea)tli of children, vuinerable poliulalions, arid al) commtmity members is of utmost importance.
4. AccountabilNty in Decisioxi-Making:
o l request the estalai)ishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmentat experts, and city officials to o'versee the environrnentai aspects of tlic project. This wikl ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice iri n'ionitoring tlie project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave, Concrete I3arrier JK Rail) to remain m place:
o l strongly urge the city to keep the K raiJ closed to all trafTic. Remoying the K barrier wil! likely )ead to increased vehicle ctnissions, further degradixig air quality.
I request a comprehensive air quality assessment i.o understaiid the potentia) health impacts on residents.Additionally,' } advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow ai'id for ongoing monitoring of air and noisc pril}ution leve]s if the bariier is removed EngaginB lieahli and environmental expetts to aitalyze tt'iese impacts is essei'itial.
l trust tliat you will give these concerns tl'ic attention tbey deserve.
Signature'WkX 0.&/ W 12-02 JDate:
l'jO 249
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
correspondientes para consitterar cmnl>iarini ol:iosici6n:
1. Pruelias Anil>ientales.Exhaustivas:
0 Solicito que el desanollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiya antes de que se implernente cualquier unidad automatizada, Hsla eva}uaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambierilales, incluyendo la caiidad del aire, la coiitaniinaci6ri acustica y 10S impactos en el trafico. Creo que cl proyecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6iica de la CEQA, seg6n fa secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrol!o). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido la ca)idad del aire o ta catidad del agua. De no ser asi, me gustaria recibir ("l info'riane comp}eto que lo den'iuestre.
2. '['ransparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detaklados sobre prolylemas de coxitaininaci6n anteriores asociados con cl sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarii, curies sustaiicias son preoci.ipantes y c6mo }as medidas de limpieza asegurarAri la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterriiea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no nmestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despt6s de} 17/08/2021,
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Coxitinuo:
o Propongo el estalilccimiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambientai coutinuo durante las f'ases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este pian debe detallar c6mo se rcalizarA et monitoreo de vapor de suelo despues de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectaii problen'ias de vapor durarite las prciebas en la etapa de peinuso de construcci6ri. Proteger )a salud da los nifios, las poblaciones yulnerables y todos 103 miembros de la comunidad es de rnAxima importancia. 4, Responsaliil*dadenlaTomadeDecisiones:
o Solicito cl estableciiniento da un consejo asesor comunitario que it'icluya a residentes, expertos en medio arribiente y funcionarios de la ciudad pata supervisar los aspectos ainbicntales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA IEI rcndici6n de cuentas y brindarA a 10S residentes una voz en el monitoreo dc 108 impactos del proyecto,
5. La barrern (K Rail) da Adellsi Ave. permanecera en su lugsr:
o Ur,io encarecidainente a la ciudad a mantcner e) K 'i-ail cerrado a todo tr6fico. T.,evaiitar ka barrera ctelK probablemente coi'iducirA a un arunento en las emisiones da vehiculos, degradai'i<lo hu:in mis la calidad c'iel aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n iritegra) de la calidad del aire para coniprciider Ios posibles in'ipactos en la salud de log residentes. Adem6s, abogo por reaiizar pruebas da niveles de ruido para evahtar Jos efectos de] auincnto en el flujo de trAfico y por ym monitoreo contiriuo de los niveles dc coritaiuinaci6n del aire y del ruido si se lcvanta la barrera. Es csencial invol'itcrar a expertos an salud y medio ainbicnte para ana)izar estos impac[os, Conto en que darai'i a es(as preocupaciones la ate:i'ici6n q'ie merecen, Fecha
231 250
OPPOSrrlON TO 10130 ADELI,A PROJECT
"Project") Below, I have outlined my reasons for opposing and correspoi'iding requests to consider clxaiiging my opposition:
L Comprehensive Eiiviromnental Testing:
o I tequest tliat tl"ie developer conduct a thorough Environmental Iinpact Assessment (EIA) before tlte Project is approved, This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, incJuding air qtiality, noise pollution, and traf:t-xcimpacts. T believe tliat the pro.iect should not be qualified as exempt under CI3QA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-1)evelopmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relatixig to (raffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the aboiie untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o :i seek detailed reports oii past contan'iination 'issries associated witJi the project site aiid how these will be addressed. Specifically, l would like to know wliat tests wili be conducted, wLiich substances are of coricern, and liow clean-up me.itsures will ensure soil aiid groundwater safety. As tlie Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/1 7/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental I!'Io.nitoring:
0 E propose tl'ie establisliment oj: a plan for ongoing environi'nental moni(orixig throng}'iout the construction and operational phases. This plan sl'iou)d out.line liow soil vapor nioniloring win be conducted post-construction aiid include contingency plans if vapor issues are detectedcturin@ testing a( the building permit stage, Protecting fJic heaI(h of children, vulnerable populations, and all con"imunity memtyers is of utmost iri'iportance.
4, Aecountability in I)ecision-Making:
o l request the establisim'ient of a community advisory board tliat includes residents, envirorunental experts, and city orficials to oversee the environmental aspects of tlie project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring tlic project's impacts.
5, AdellaAve. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rai} closed to all trai'fic. Removing the K barrier wifl likely lead to iricreased ve'l'iic]e emissioi'is, fuither degrading air quality, I request a con'ipreliensive air qua!i(y assessrnei'itto understai'id the potentiaf heatth ir'npacts on residents. Additionally, i advocate [oi' noise )evel testing to evaluate the gffccts of iticseasetl traffic flow and for ongoing n'ionitoruig of air and noise po]]ution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential
I trust that you wiH Hive these concerns the attention they cleserve.
Date: 0'VW2,!,"-
1'5'l- 251
OPPOSIIION I'0 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I"Pr2'/elo!l'h':/r'!:7o"'utli'"n'iy reasonsfor op-pomsi'ngoapipidosc'ollrgreTsllpeonlO cltanging my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmeixta) Testing:
o Krcquest that the developer conduct a tl'xorr':iughI:nvironinerrtal Iinpact Assessment ('IA) before the Project is approved. This assessment shoukl eyaluate all potential environmental efBects,incl'uding air 4uality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. J believe tl'iat the project should not be qualified as exeinpt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (C)ass 32-Devetopmental Projects), Approva} of the projec[ may result in significant effects re)ating to traffic,'noisc, air quaiity, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive tlie comprehensive repoit tliat proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o i seelc detailed reports on past containination issues associated with the project site and l'iow these will be addressed. Specifically, 1 would like to 1<now wliat tests will be coi'iducted, which substitnces are of concern, and lThOWciean-tip measures wili ensure soi) and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8!'17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o l proposethe estabkishn'ient of a plan for ongoingemrironmental moni(orin@ throughout the construction and operational phases. Tltis plan sliotdd outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plmis if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protectir>g the lteajth of chifdren, yulnerable populations, and al} comtnunity mei'i'ibers is or utmost importatice.
4, Accountability ixi Decision-Making:
o 1 requcst tl'ic establislunent of a connntinity advisory lx:iard that iiiciudes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oyersee the environn'ienta) aspects of the project. Tliis will ensure accountabiiity aiid provide residents witli a voice in monitoring the prqject's in"ipacts.
5, Adelja Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Riiil) to reniain in place:
o I strongly urge ibe city to ke.ep the K rai] closed to all traffic. Removing (he K barrier will likety lead to iricrcased vehicle e.inissions, further ctegrading air quality.
I request a coi'nprelieusive air quality assessn'ient to understarid tie potential }'ieaitl'i impacts on residcnts. Additionany, l advocate f'or noise level testing to evaluate the efl'ects of increased taffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if tlie barrier is removed. Engaging Jiealth and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
Ttrust that you will give these concerns tlie attention tliey deserve. ,I)
Date: of-'llzr
15?7 252
OPOSICION AI, PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
corrcspondientes pga considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Ambientales Exbatistivag:
o Soticito qaueel dcsaiaroliador realice una II3va}uaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (E'iA) exhaustiva ai>tes de que se implemente cuaTquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe e'valuar todos los posililes efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, ta son(aminaci6n actistica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberta ca2ificar como 8xento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtin la secci6nl5332 (Cla.se32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrJa tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el i'uido, la calidad de} aire o Ia calidad del aHua, Da no ser asi, me gustarta recibir el informe con'xpleto que lo demtiestre,
2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco iriformes detallados solire problen'ias de coiitamiiiaci6n aiiteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6'mo se abordarm. Especificamente, me gustaria saber que pruebas se tea}izarAn, curies sustaxicias SOII preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurar*n la seguiidad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea, Dado que e) Geo Tracker no muestra prucbas adicioxiales realizadas despues del 27/08/202).
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo;
o Px'opongo el establecin'iiento de un plan para el monitoreo cu'i'ibiental coritimio duranLe las fases de construcci6n y opeiaaci6n. Estc plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarAel n'ionitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s <le la cohstrucci6n e induir planes de contingencia si se dctectari problemas rie vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de periniso de constrt.icci6n. Proteger ia salud de los niffos, ias pobJacioxies vulnerables y todos )os miembros de la cornunidad es c(e rnAxima imporlancia. 4, Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el estabiecimiertto de yin consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y fiincionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garaxitizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindar;i a los residentes una voz et el ntonitoreo de los impactos €l61 proyecto.
5. La barrera (K Rail) do Adella Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Uijo encarccidamente a la ciridad a mantencr cl K rai] cerrado a todo tral'tco. Levantar la barrera del K probablemente conducirA a un aumento en las en'iisiones de vehfculos, degradando akin mis la calidad dcl airc. SoJicito una evaluaci6n iritegral de la calidad del siire para comprender los posibles irapactos eri Ia salud de los residentes. AdemAs, abogo poi' realizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para e'valuar ios efectos dcl aumento en el flujo de trhfico y por un monitoreo contin.uo <le )os niveles de coxitamihiaci6n dei aire y del ruido si se levaiita la barrera, Es esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para aiializar estos impactos.
Conffo enque daxaaiia estas lireocupaciones la atenci6ri que increcen.
FirS'ia ?A'rl>S
Fecha"
'23'-1253
OPPOSITION 'l'0 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I 14 <)') Se5 Q(O iiiiiiiii amopposingtheiOl30AdellaProject(the "Project") Below, l have outlined my reasons fot opposing and correspondingrequeststo consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprebensive Environmental Testing:
0 I request that the developer conduct a thororigh EnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. I-his assessment should evaluateall potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution,andtraffic impacts,I believe that the prqiect should riot bequakifiedasexemptmder CEQACategorical Exemption under zction 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects).Approvalof the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensivereport that proves the above untnxe.
2. Transparency on Contamination issues:
o I seek detailed repoits on past contamination issues associatedwith theprojectsite and how these will be addressed. Specifically, 1 wouldiiketo knowwhattestswill be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measureswill ensure soi) ai'td groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show futther testing done after 8/27/2021.
3. Ongoing Enviroximental Monitoring:
o I propose lhe establislxment of a pian for ongoing environmentalmonitoring throughout the construction aitd operational phases. Tl'iisplanshouldoutlineltow soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-coristruc(ton aixd include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testii'ig at the building pertnit stage, Protecting the healll'i of chitdren, vulnerable popuiatiorxs, and all community members is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o 'l request the esU'iblishmcnt of a cozi'imtinity arlvisory board thal includes residents, environmental experls> and city officialg to overqee the environrnenta) aspects of the project. This wili ensure accou'itabiiity and provide residents with a voice in monitoring tlie project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave, Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier wiil likely lead to increased vel'iicle emissions, further degrading air quality. l request a comprehensiye air quality assessment to understand the potential healtli impacts all testtlcnts, AdditioriaJly, I advocate for noise level testing to evaluate tlie effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution Ievels if ilie barrier is removed, Bngaging health and environmental experts to aim!yze these impacts is esseritial.
I tmst that you will give these concerns the attention they deserve. si&- [;?7' Date:
254
OPPOSlTiON TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
.T S,)I !;"='- am opposing the tOl30AdeltaProject(tlxe
a'Project")Below, I ha';e 6uttined n'iy reasonsfor opposingand correspondingrequeststo consider clianging my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental l'esting:
o I request that the developer coriduct a thorough EnyironmentakJmpactAssessment (BIA) before the Project is approved.This assessmerxtshould evaluateal} potential environmental effects, incIuding air quality, iioise pollution, avidtraffic impacts, L believe thatthe piqiect should not be qualified asexemptunderCEQACategorical Exemption under section 15332 (Ciass 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of the pro3ecimay result in signi'ficanteffectsrelatingto traffic,noise,airquality,or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the cotnprehensiye report that proves the above uritrue.
2. I'ransparency on Contamination lssues:
o Iseekdetailedreportsonpastcontai'ninationissuesassociatedwiththeprojectsite and 110Wthese wiu be addressed, Speci'f-ically, 1 would like to know what tests wilk be conducted, wliich substances are oiaconcern, and how clean-up measureswit} ensure soil and groundwater safety, As tlie €jeo l'racker does not show fuither testing done after 8/17,!'2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitortng:
o I proposc the establtsliment of a plan for ongoing envirorunexttal monitoririg throughout the construction aitd operational phases.This plan should outline ltow soiJ vapor monitorii'ig wilJ be conducted post-construcfion and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the biiilding permit stage, Prot.ecting the iicalth of cliildren, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost impoitance
4. Aeeountability ixi Decisiorp-Making:
o I request ti'ie estabiishrnent of a commuriity advisory board tliat includes residents, environmental experts, and ci'iy offiaials to oversee t}ic envimnmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability atid provide residents with a yoice in monitoring tlie project's impacts.
S. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain tn place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail ctoscd to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likeIy lead to increased veliicle exnissioi's, further degrading air quality. [requesta comprehensive air quatity assessmentto understandthepotentia) healtb impacts on residents. Additionally,] advocate for noise !evel testing to evaluate the effects of increased taffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution Jevels if tlie baxrier is renioved, Engaging liealth and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential
l trust that you wiJl give these concerns the attention they deserve. ,,Q-;4":)J5
Date:
255
OPPOSITION TO 00130 ADELLA PROJECT
:F'roject")Below, I have Jtlined my reasonsfor opposingand cor'taespo.iiding requests to consider chang'ng my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmeiital Testing:
o !requestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironrnentaJImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved.This assessmentshould evaluate aIl potential enviroiimental effects, inc2udingair quality, noise poliution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be quatified asexen'iptunderCEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tliis is not true, l would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the aboveuntiue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
0 Tseekdetaifed reports on pastcontamination issuesassociatedwith the project site andhowthese wil! be addressed.Specifically,Iwould like to know what testswill be coxiducted,whicli substancesare of concern, and how clean-up measureswill ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/202},
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o l propose tl'ie establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring tmoughout the construct.ionand operational phases.This plan should outiine how soil vaprir monitoring will be conductedpost-constuction andinclude contingency plans if vapor issues ayaedetected durii'ig testiizg at the building permi'L stage, Protecting the health of chil*en, vulnerable populations, and all counity members is of utinost importance.
4, Aecountabiiity in Decision-Making:
o I requesttlte establishmentof a community advisory boardthat includes residents, environ'inental e.xperts,and city oF&ials to OVOrgee the environnientaJ aspects' of tlte project,l'his wit} ensure accountabiiity atxdprovide itsictents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strong}yurgethe city to keep theK rail closed to ail traffic, Removing the K barrierwill likely leadto increasedvel'iicle emissioi'is,fiirthcr degrading air quality.
I request acomprehensiveair qualityassessnientto understandtlie potentia) health impactsonresidents, Additionally,1 advocatefor noise level testing to evaluate tl'ie effectsof increasedtraffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air aiid noise pollutionlevelsif thebarrieris removed.Hngaging healtli ai'id environmental experts to ariatyzethese impacts is essemiaL
I trustthatyouwil) give theseconcerns tlie attention tliey deserve. -AZ'
Signature/ ,/
J :)- 7'" 2o7,rDate:
l','i 256
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELi,A PROJECT
Project") Be!og I have outlined my reasons for opposinz and coriesponding requests to tonsider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmcntal Testing:
o Irequestthatthedeveloperconductatl'ioroughEnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before tl'ie Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, includirig air quatity, noise poliution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project shot'ild not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approva! of the project may result in significaii't effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quajity. If taxisis not true,I would like to receiye the comprehensive report that proves the abo've untue,
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated With tile project site and liow these win be addressed, Specifically, 1 would lilce to knoxv what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concerri, and how cleaii-up measures wit) ensure soik and groundwater safety. AS the Geo Tracker does not show fuitlier testing donc sffler 8/!7/2021.
3. Ongoing Envirohmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing erivironmental monitoring throughout the coristniction and operational phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction ai'id include contingency plans if vapor isSueS are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, and ail community members is of utmost importance.
4. Accouxitabijity in Decision-Making.
o I request the estabJisiiment of a con'imunity advisoiy board that inclrides residents, cnvirosunenta( cxpcrls, aixd city officizils to overgee the environmental aspectg of the project.This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in morfftoring the project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Coxicrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrierwill iikely Jeadto increasedvehicle emissions, fiuther degrading air quality.
Irequestacomprehensiveaitaquality assessment to understai'id the potential health impactsorxresidents. Additionally, I advocatefor notsele'vel testing to evaluate the effectsof increasedtraffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise polJutirmlevelsif the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmcntal exper(s to analyze these impac(s is essentiaJ.
1trusttliatyouwill givetheseconcerns (he attention tl'iey deserve. (")?- 2==1-20 8-
Date:
257
OPPOSITION TO lOi30 ADELLA PROJECT
Project") Belowj have outliried my reasons for opposing aiid con('sponding requests to corisider chang,ing my opposition:
L Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o IrequesttltatthedeveloperconductatliorougliEnvironmenta}ImpactAssessment (EIA) before tlie Project is approved. Tliis assessment sbould eva]uate al) potential environniental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, 1 believe that the project shoutd not be qualified as exennpt under CHQACategorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the pm,ject may result in significant effects relating to lraffic, noise, air qtiality, or water quality, If tliis is not true, I would like to receive tlie comprehensive repoit that proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamit'tatxon issues associated with the project site and how these wiH be addressed. Specificaliy, I woulct like to know what tests will be conducted, wbich substances are of conccrn, and how clean-up measures win enstue soil aiid @roundwater safety. As tlie Geo Tracker does not show fiirther testing done after 8/17/2024.
3. Ongoing Environnxental Monitoring:
o ! propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing en'vironmenta} monitoring tiiroughout the construction aiid operatiorial pliases, This plan should outline liow soiJ vapormonitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected dtuing testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the healih of children, vulnerable populations, gid all community members is of utmost impoitance
4. Accountabi €ity in Decis*on-Malcingi
o Irequesttheestablistimentofacommunityadvisoryboardthatincludesresidems, environmc:i'ital expcrts, avid city officials to oversee (he envirorinienta) aspects of the project. Tliis wiil ensure accountal:iility and provide residents with a voice in moititoring tlte project's impacts.
5, AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRail)toremaininplace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep tlte K rail closed to ali traffic. Removing the K barrier will }ikeiy lead to iiicreased veliicie emissions, further degrading air quality.
I request a comprebr;msi've air quality assessment to understand the potential liealth impacts oll residexxts,Additionally, :[advoca'l:efornoise Je'veltestin@ to e'valuate the effects or increased traffic flow an<t for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if tbc bairier is ren':iovcd, EngaBing health and environmental experts to analyze tltese impticts is essential,
I trust tliat yoci will give !hese concents tlie attention they deserve. 8iBn'atf:SC'A' Dpte
258
OPPOSJTION TO 10130 /kDELLA PROJECT
"Projcct>') Be'low,'I have outlined my reasons for opposing and.corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1, Comnreliensive Environmental Testin Compreliensive Testing:
o Xrequest that the developer conduct a tliorough Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before tl'ic Project is approved. This assessment stiould evaluate al! potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollutioi'i, and traffic impacts, I belie've that the projecf should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section }5332 (Ciass 32-Developmental Projects). Approvat of the p;ject may result in sig,xiificant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tliis is not true, I would like to receive the co.inpreliensive report that pmves (he above untrue.
2, Transparency on Contamtnation ISSues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contarnixiation issues associated witlt the project sit.e and liow these wiU be addressed. Specifically, } would like to know what tests will be conducted, wliicli substances are of concern, and how cleaii-up measures will er*sure soil and grotindwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show fuither testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Envtrorunental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing erivironn'iental monito*g throrighout the consttuction and operational phases. This plan should outline how soi] vapor tnonitoring wilf be conducted post-coiisruction and ixiclude contingency plans if vapor issues are detected du:ing testing at the building permit stage.
Protectirxg the health of chiMren, vulnerable populatioris, and all commtmity n'iembers is of utmost importance,
4. Accountabitity in Decision-Making:
o I reque.stlie establishmentof a community advisory board that ixicludes residents, cnyironmcrxta!experts, and city of&ials to oversee the environmentaJ aspectg of the project. 'rl'iis wiil ensure accoi.uxtability and provide residents witl'i a voice in monitoring the pro,ject's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain iyi place:
o I stronglytuagethecity to keep the K rail closed to all traffic, Removing the K barrierwiii }ikelyleadtoincreasedveliicle emissioris, furtlierdegrading air quality. l requestacoinprehensivcairqualityassessment to understand the potentiaj health impactsonresidents.Addilionally, I advocate for noise level testing to evacuate tlie effectsof increasedtraffic flow andfor origoing moxiitoring of air and noise pollutionle'velsif the barrieris remoxed. Engaging bealfli and environmental experts to analyze tliese impac(s is essential.
{trustthatyouwill g,Avetheseconcetns theattention tliey deserve.
Date
l't0 259
OPPOSIIION TO 10130 ADEI,],A PROJECT
Project") Below, I have outIined my reasons for opposing and cotresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a tliorough Environmental impact Assessment (EIA) before llie I)roject is approved. Tliis assessment slioi.ild eyatt'iate all potential extvironmental effects,incJudingair quality,noise liollution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorica} Exemption undt,r section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Proiects). Approval of the project may result in significaiit effeicts re!ating to tra'[tic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, l worild )ike to receive the compreliensive repoit tha( proves the aboye uiitrue,
2, Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seelcdetailed reports oil past contamii'iat:ion issues associated with the pmject site and how these will be addressed. Specificallyjwould like to know wl'hat tests will be coxiducted, wl'iitki substances are of concern, ancl liow clean-up measures wil} ensure soil and groundwater safety. As tlie Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmentai Monitoring:
o i proposethe establishmentof a plan for ongoingenvii-oi'uncntal monitorini, throughoul the construction and operational phases, aIliis plan sttoulcl outline liow soil vapor moriitoring w.ill bc conducted post-construction arid incluile contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at tlie bui)ding permit stage, Protecting the healtti of cliildren, vulnerable poputations, and all community men'ibers is of ritmost importaiice.
4, Accountnbility in Decision-Making:
o l request the establistu'nent of a community advisory boarri tliat includes residents, envirom:i'iental expeils, and city officiais to oversee the environmental aspects of the ptqiecl. This wiJl ensure accountabitity and provide residents witli a voice in monitoring the project's impacU.
5, Adeila Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in peace:
o l strongly urge tl'ie city to keep tlie K rail closed to all traffic. Renioving the K barrier will kikely lead to increased vehicle emissions, rcirtlier degrading air quality.
Irequest a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the poten(ial health impacts oi't residems. Additionally, I advocate l"or noise Jevel I:esting to evaluate tbe effects of increased traflic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poilution Ievels if the barrier is removeci. Engaging health and environmental experts to analyze tliese impacts is essential.
Itrustthatyotrwill vetheseconcerustl"ieallentiontheydcservc. ,31-9q[ar Date
'13-tt 260
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA l)ROJECT
"Projecf') Below', l: have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
I. Comprehensive Environmental Tesliiig:
o l request that the developer conducta tliorough Environmental In'ipactAssessment (EIA) before thePzject is approved. Tliis assessment sl"iould evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air qtialiy, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. l believe that the project should not be qualified as cxempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section15332 (Class 32-Developmental Pm,iects). Approval of the project may resulL in significai"it effects relating to trafIic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tl'iis is not ttue, :[ wou!d like to receive the compreliensive report that proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contaminutioxi Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past coxitaminalion iSSuesassociated wiith the prqject site and how these witl be addressed, Specifically,I would like to lcnow what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures wilt ensure soil and groundw;tier safety, As the Geo T'racker does not sliow further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing F,nvironmental Monitorjng:
0 l propose the establishmen( of a plan for ongoing enviroi'mental monitoring throu@liout the construction and operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor moiiitoring will be conducted post-conmuction and inctude contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at tl'ie building pertnit stage.
Protecting the hea]th of cliildren, vt'ilnerable populations, and all cotnmunity memlyets is of utmost importartce,
4. Accountability in Decisioxi-Makiug:
o .1request the establishment of a comxnunity advisory board that includes residents, environn'>entai experts, and city officials to oversee (he enviro:imiental aspects of tlie project. This will enst.tre accountabi)ity and provide residents with a voice in n'ionitoring tl'xepro3ec.t's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail c)osed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will Iikely lead to increascd veliicle emissions, fu'itlier degrading air quality, :[request a comprel'i.erisive air quality assessinent to understand the potentiat health impacts on residents, Additionally, I a<tvocate for noise tevel testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air aud noise pollution levels ifathe barrier is removed. Engaging heaith and environnyental experts to analyze tbese impacts is essentia).
I trust that you will giye the.seconcerns the attention they deserve.
Sigmature Date:
3)gt-ilas=
'2,-l2. 261
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pmebas Ambientiiles Exliaustivns:
o Solicito que cl desarroJlador realice ms, Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EJA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemetrte cualqriier unidad automatizada. Esta evatuaci6n debe evatuar to<los los posibles efectos antbientaies, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acilstica y los impactos en el trafico. Creo que cl proyecto i'xo delyeria calificar como exento bajo la Exetici6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtui la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarroflo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos significativos en e! trAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. I)e no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir el informe completo que !o deinuestre,
2, Transparencia sobre ProLilemas de Contsminaci6ri:
o Busco informes det.alIados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6ino se abortlarAn. Especfficamente, nie gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, envies sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las inedidas de limpiez.a asegi.trarffin la seguridad dei suelo y del agua subteiThnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no ntuestra pruebas adicionales realizada,s despu6s del t7/08/2021.
3. Moxiitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
c Propongo cl establecitniento de un plat'i para ci tnoniloreo ambiental continuo durante laS f:iises de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detatlar c6mo se reaJizara ei monitoreo de vapor de suelo despues de la constiiicci6n e inclnir planes dc coiitingencia si se detectan prob)emas de vapor durante kas pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de ]os niffos, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es dc maxima importancia, 4, Responsabtlidad an ia i'omn de Decisiones:
o Soiicito el establecimieiito de un consejo asesor comcinitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambie.i'ite y fitncionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectosainbientalesdel proyecto.Esto garantizarala rendici6t'ide cuentas>r brindaraa IoSresidentesu'i'iavoz enel monitoreodelos irnpactosdel liroyecto.
5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. pcrmanecera en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidairienle a Ia ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico.
Le'vantar la bairera del K probablemente coriducirA a in aumento en la'i emisiones de vehiculos, degradando aii mis la calidad del aire. Solicito una evuluaci6n integral de ta ca!idad del aire para co'inprender los posibles i.inpactos en la salud de tos residentes, Ademas, abogo por realizar pruebas de nive}.es de ruido para evhluar los efectos del acunento en el Jlu,jo de trafico y por un monitoreo continuo de tos nive}es de contaminaci6ri del aire y del ruiclo si se levanta la barrera. Es esencial involucrar a expertos en saJud y medio anibiente para aiializar cstos impactos.
Confio en que darAt> a estas preocu'paciones la atenci6n que inerecen.
Firma Fe?ct 2tlf
23-t3 262
OPPOSIITON TO IOJ30 ADELLA PROJECT
I ),/!rxh n q S-}ex! ekr ve> amopposin@the10130AdellaPtoject(the <'Project") Below, I KReout!ined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Enviromnental Testing:
o Irequest(hatthedeveloperconductathor'oughEaxvironmentallmpactAssessment (EIA) be:f'ore the Project is approved, This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effec'ts, including air quaiiy, noia pol}ution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQACategoiical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Dcve?opmei'ital I)rojects), Approva) of the project may result in significaiit effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, 1 tvould like to receive the comprel'iensive report that proves tlie above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past comainiitation issues associated with the project site and l'lOW tI'iese wiil be addressed, Specifically, I would like to know what tests wil) be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how cleari-up measures will ensure soil anct grotindwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testirig done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose tl'ic cstablisliment of a plan for ongoixig environmental monitoring throughout tlze ccinstruction and ope'iationat pliases. This plan should outline how soil vapor riionitoring will be conducted post-constructiori aiid iiiclude contingency plans if vapor issues are detected dtuing testing at the buiiding pern'iit stage, Protecting the l'iealth of childrei'i, vulnerable populations, and all commtinity members is of utmost importaiice.
4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o Srequest the establishment of a community advisoiy board that includes residents, enyironmcntal experts, and city oJ'fie.ials to oversee lhc environmentaf aspects of the project. This wiil ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier (K Raid)to remain in lilace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrierwill likely leadto increased vehicle emissions, farther degrading' air quaiity.
I requestacomprehensiveair qriality assessmentto understandthe potential healtlx impactsoriresidents.Additiona}ly,1advocate for noise ievc} te,sting to evaluate the effects of increasedtraffic tlow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution (evelsif the barrier is removed. Engaging heaith and environmental cxpeyts to analyze these impacts is essential.
Itust jhatyouwill givethesecoxicerns the attention they dcserve.
Signature 'r
3- 24-?!S
Date:
263
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
"Pro3ecl')
t A,,'\:"'){"
Below,
&., S,,u Ah2(akt7) atnopposingthe10130AdeJlaProject(he l haveou?}ined-my reasonsforopposingandcorrespondingrequeststoconsider cliarxging my oppositioii:
1. Comprehensive lunvironniental l'egting:
o {requegtthatthedevelopereonductatboroughEnvironnxentallmpactAssessment (ETA) before the Project is approved, This assessment should evaluate al( potential envirorimental effects, inciudin@ air q'ctatity, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. l believe thaf theproject shoutd txot be qualified as exetnptitnder CEQA Categorical Exemption under zctioii 15332 (Class 32-Developinental Projects). Approvai of the project may result ill sipificant effects relaling to traffic, noise, air quaiity, or water quality. If this is not true, T would like to receive the comprebensiye xtport tliat proves the above tintrue.
2. Tkaansparency on Contamination ISsues:
0 I seek detailed reports on put coixtarninatitm issues associated witlt the project site andhow tliese will be addressed. Specificaily, I would }ike to know what tests will be conducted, wliich substances ait of concern, and how cleati-up measures will erxstu'e soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not mow futtlier testing done after 8/27/202L
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishmentof a plan for oxigoir4 environmental motfftoring Ihroxig,hout the conmruction and operational phases. This plan sbould ouaine how soil vapormonitoring wili be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vqpor ISSUESare detected dmng tes(ing at the building permit stage, Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations> and aIl commtinity members is of utmost importaixe.
4. Accottntability in Deeision-Makitig:
o 'f re.quest tl'ie estabiishmem of a con"imtmity advisoiy board that includes residents, envimiimental expeits, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of tlie project. This will ensure accot.mtability and provide residents with a voice iii monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave, Concrete Bairier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o
barrier
l strongly
witl
urea the city to keep the K rail clozd to all traffic- ReinovinB the K likely Iead to ixicreased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality. I request a comprehensive air quality assessrnmit to understaitd the potcntiat healtlt impacts 011 residents. Additionally, I advocaic for rioiz leyel testing to evaluatetbe effects of increased traffic flow atid for ongoing monitoring of air aim noise po}tution levels if the bartier is removed. Engaging health and envirorimental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
T trust that you will give these concerns the atteiition they deserve.
Signature 3-? (a- Z,SDate:
z't6 264
OPPOSITJON TO 10130 ADELLAPROJ. € Cl'
I,)OSe\5eE: amopposingthelOl30AdellaProjed(the "Prolect") clxanging my
Below,1haveoutlinetlmy reasorisforoppositigandcorrespondingrequests tocorisider opposition:
1. (,omprelieusxve Environmental Testing:
o lrequestthatthedevelopereonductathoroughHnvironrneritalImpactAssesmmt (EIA) before the Project.is approved, This assesgi'ient should evaluate all poteritial envirorimental effects, iiaicluding air quiity, noise pollutioii, and traffic impacts. I believet'hat the project shouIdnot be qualified as exeinpt xtnder CEQACategorical Exemption undet- section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). ApprovaJ of the project may resuit in significant effec'is piating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If this is not true, ! would Jike to receive tlie comprehenive report that provesthe aboye untrue.
2. Transpa:rency on Contamination Issues;
o I seek detailed i:eports on past contamination issues a.ssociated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifica!!y, I would like to know wlial tests wiil be conduc.ted, wliich substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure zil and groundwater safety. As the Oeo Trncker does not show further testing done afier 8/17/2021,
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propoz tlie cstabiishmertt of a piax"i fox ongoing eri'virontnental monitoring througlioxtt the coxistruction and operational phases. This plan should outline how soi) vapormonitoririg will be conducted post-constrciction and include coniingency plans if vapor iSSues are detected durixig testing at the building permit stage. 'trotecting the liealth of cliildren, vulnerab)e populations, and all community mccnbers is of utmost importaiice.
4. AceotintabiJity in Decisioix-Making:
o Irequesttheestablislirnentofaco'nununityadvisoxyboardthatincludesresiderits, enyironmental experts, armcity officiafs to oversee the environinenta! aspects of tbe project, l'liis wiil ensme accountability imd provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. A4ejlaAve,ConciaeteBarrier(KRnil)toremaininplace:
o k strongly urge the city to keep the 'K rail ciosed to all traffic. Rcmoving tits K barrier will iikely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quaiity. I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand ihe potential heali impacts on residents, Additionally, l advocate fornoise Level testing to evaiuatethe effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollulion levels if the barrier is remo'ved. Bngaging health aiid environmentai experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
that you will ve ffic"e concerns the attemton they desexave.
Date: ,)/!rl/ZS
265
OPPOSITiON TO 10130 ADI!,LLAPROJF,CT
I)roject")Below,I haveoutlinedmyreasonsforoliposing andcotrespondingrequeststoconsider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Eiiviroximental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironrnentallmpactAssessment (BJA) beforetlie Project is approved, This assessmeiit shou!d evatua(e ailpotential environmental eff'ects, ixicluding air quality, noise poilution, atid traffic impacts. I beJieve thal the project sliould not be qtakified as exempt under CEQA Categoricai Exetnption under section I5332 (Ciass 32-DevelopxnentaJ Projects). Approval of tlie project may result in signi&ant effects relating 10 traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. if this is xiot true,Iwould iike to receive the compreheitsive report ttiat proves the above unhiie.
2. Transparency on Contanxinntioti Issues:
0 I Seek det!tiled tep(XtS On pa9t (,Ontan'lination iS8ueS associated With the project Site ai'id how tltese will be addiessed. Specifically, I would )ike lx>know wjiat tests wil{ be conducted, which substances aioe of concem, mid how clean-up measures will ensure soi! and groundwater saj'ety. As tits Geo Tracker does not show fuxther testing doi'ie nfte.r 8/17/2021.
3. OngoAng Environmental Monitoriuga.
0 l propoe tlie estabiishment of a plan for ongoing environmental moiiitoring througliout the constuction aitd operationa) phases, This piati should outiine how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include coixtu'xgency plans if vapor ISSUES are detected during kgtitxg at the tmiJding permit stage. Protecting the healtti of children, 'vuknerable popuiations, and all community members is of utmom imporiance.
4. Accountability in Dectsion-Mak&ng:
o I xqtiest the establishment of a community advisoiy board that includes residents, environmenta} experts, and city officiats to oversee the enviconmenta! aspects of the project. This will ensure accouritability and provide residents witli a voice iil ntonitoring the project's impacts.
5. Ade]Ja Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge (he city to keep the K rail closed to al! traffic. Removing ttie K baiiierwi(l iiktly lead to increasedvehicle emissions, ftntherdeBradingair quatity. I request a comprehensive air qtiality assessment to understand tlte potential health impacts on residerxts, Additionally,Iadvocate for noise tevel testingto evaluatcthe effec(;s of increased traffic flow and for ongoing inonitoring of air ai'id noise pollutioii le'vels if tlie baaier is removed, Engaging health aixd environmentat experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
yoti.witl gi the attention they dcserve.
Dffte:
23-11266
OPPOS}TION I'0 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
'?roj3ct"':)B"eloUw,LIihaXveo'u'A';x Xffl!'n'sforopposingopaipido9cjollrgrel:p:nlodli clianging my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmentai 'l'esting:
o Irequestthattlxede'veJopercoriductathoroughErxvironinentallmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This asses,gnent should evaluate alfpotential envimnmental effects, inc'fuding air quality, noise pollution, atid traffic ititpacts, I belie've that the projectshould not be qualified as exempt iuxder CEQACategoiical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Deveiopmental Projects). Approval of tl'ie projeia may result ixx significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quatity, or water qtiality. lf t}iis is not true, I would )ike to receive tl'ie comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Containination issues:
o l seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site and liow these will b addressed, Specifically,IwouJd like to know what tests wink be conducted, which substances axle of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soi} and groundwatcr safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show fuither test'ng done affer 8/17/2.02L
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o 1 propox tlte establishment of a plait for oiigoing erivironniental monitoring t&oughout the construction and opexztional phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor rnonitoriq will be coriducted post-construction and include contingency P1E1115if vapor issuesare detectedduring testit'ig at tits building pcrn'xitstage. Protecting thc health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost itnpoxtance,
4. Aceountability in Deeision-Making:
o I request the estab}ishinent of a cominunity advimiy board tbat inc)udes residents, en'virorimental expeits, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of thc project, This wiU ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in nionitoringthe project's impacts. 5, Ade41a Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urgc the city to keep the K rail closed to a)! traffic. Removing the K barrier will iikely lead to inczased vehicle emissions, fiuther degrading air quality. l request a COmprehenSiVe a:ir qtiality assessment tO undef8tand the potential heaith impacts on res'idents. Additionatl)i, I advocate fornoise ievel testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow aiid for ongomg moxxitoring of air aiid noise po}lutiou levels if the barrier is removed. Hngaging heaktb and environmental experts to aixa!yze tbese impacts is essential.
I trust that you wit} give these concems the attention they deserve.
Signalute
akA
lq'5 267
OPPOSITIONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Enviroximental Test'ng:
o {requestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironrnentalImpactAssessrnent (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessnnent shouM evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, aiid tiafflc impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified eb exeanpt i.tnder CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Devetopmenta) Projects), Approval of the project may restat in significaixt effects relating to tmffic, notse, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, } would like to receive the comprehensive repoit that proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issuesi
o i seek detailed repoits on past contamiiiation issues associated with the project site and how these wiii be addressed, Specifically, I would iike to know what tests wikl be coiiducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021,
3. Ongoing Enviromnental Monitoring:
o I propose the estabiishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction aiid operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plaris if vapor issues are detected duxing testing at the building pennit stage, Protecting the liealth of chiidren, vulnerabie populatioiis, and all community members is ofutmost impoitance,
4, AceounUtbiltty in Decision-Mnking:
o I request the estab}ishinent of a cominunity advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the envimnmentat aspects of ttte ptoject. 'This will ensure accountability and proyide residents with a voice in monitoring t'he project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rai) c}osed to all traffic. Removing the K bariier wilL likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, fiirther degrading air quality.
I req'uest a comprehensive air qtiality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally,Iadvocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of iricreased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poilution Jevels if the Liarrier is removed. Engaging health and environmenta} experts to analyze tltese impacts is essentiat.
I trust tliat you will give tliese concerns tIie at(:entiori they deserve.
Signature
O'c -1,-1-402ir
Date:
268
OPPOSIT]ON TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
"Proied) Below, } have outlined my rebdons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changin@my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o irequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentalImpactAssessment (E'[A) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmentateffects, inchiding air quality, noise poilution, and tratTic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt ui'ider CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmerital Projects). Approval of the project may resuIt in significant effects re}ating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true,I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue,
2. Thinsparen7 on Contamination Issues:
o } seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated witl'i the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to kriow what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done affer 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the estabiishment of a p}aii for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the,constritctiori and operatioxial phases, This plan sl'iould outiine how soilvapormonitoringwil! be conducted post-constructionandinclude contingericy plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building peimit stage.
Protecting tlie health of cliildren, vuinerable populations, and all community men'ibers is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability jn Decision-Making:
0 I i'equest the establishment of a community advisory board tliat includes residents, environmental experts, axtd city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. Tl'iis will ensure accountability axid provide residents with a voice ixi monitorin@ the project'simpacts.
5, AdellaAve,ConcreteBarrier(KRail)toremnininplace:
o l strongky urge tlie city to keep the K rail closed to al] traffic. Rernoving the K barrier will likely lead to increasedvehicle emissions, further degrading air quaiity, l request a comprehensive air quality 21ssessinentto understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate fornoise leve) testingto evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing moriitoring of air and noise poliution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health aiid enyironmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
Itrust that you win give these concerns the attention they deserve. /Signature D,q,b],s=,g /2,5
160 269
OPPOSITION TO 30)30 ADELLAPROJECT
'l'Projec(!B"elo'OJ E}outlined my reasonsfor oppo7ingopanpdosc'ollrgre'speon10 changing my opposition:
1, Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmental Impact Assessment (ETA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evacuateal} potentiaJ environmentat effects, inc]uding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Deyelopmental Pmjects), Approva) of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tbis is not true, I wouM lik.e to receive the cotnprehensive report that proves tlie above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed repoxts on past coniamination issues associated with the project site and how these wit} be addressed, Specifically, I wOuid like to kriow what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how c]eaxi-up measures will ensure soi€ and groundwater safety, As the Oeo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2022.
3. Ongo:mg Environmental Monitoring:
o L propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing enviroi'unental monito.ting throughout the construction and operational phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wilJ be conducted post-constiuction arid include contixigency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populatioxis, and all cotmnunity members is of xitmost importance
4. AccountabiliLy in Deeisioxi-Making:
o } request the establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRail)toremaininpjace:
o I strongly urge tlie city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will Likely )ead to increased vehicle emissions, further degradiiig ait quality.
I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential heia)tli impacts on residents. Additioxially,Iadvocate for noise }evel testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution }e'vels if the barrier is removed. 'Engaging health and environmenta} expeits to analyze these impacts is essential
:[ trust that you will give these concems the attention they deserve, Signature (
'igqhs
Date:
:!St 270
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
l S'g (i '/ /,'? qY!/ v! f,Xi amopposingthelOi30AdellaProject (the "Project") Below, I haveoutlinedmy reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Enviromnental Testing:
o frequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvirontnentaHrnpactAssessment (EIA) beforetheProjectis approved. This assessment should evaluate all potentia] einvironmentateffects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, I beiieve that the project should not be qualified as exemptunder CEQACategorical Exe.xnption uttder section 15332 (CIEISS32-Devefopmenta} Projects), Appro'val of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. ff this is xiot true, Iwould like to receive the compreliansi've report that proves the above untrue.
2, Transparency on Contamination issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past coritainii'iation issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed, Specificatly, I would like to know what tents will be conducted, wliich substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soii and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/77/202I,
3. Ongoing Enviroximental Monitoring:
o I propose the egtablishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapormonitoring will be conducted post-constuction aiid include coxitingency plans if vapor issues aie detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the health of cl'iildren, vulnerable populations, and a!I community mcmbers is of uttnost importance
4. Accoiintability in Deciaion-Malcing:
o l request the estabJisliment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environinental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts,
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in pjace:
o I stroxigly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic, Removing the K tyairier will likely lead to increased veliicle tanissions, futther degrading air quality.
I request a compreherisive air quality assessment to understand the potential l'xealtli impacts on residents, Additionally, I ad'vocate fornoise level testiiig to evaluate the effects of increased ttaffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution Zevels if the barrier is removed. Eiigagiiig health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
Itnist that you will give these concerns the attemion tliey deserve.
Signature a Da?telY/'e's.as-
'2,52- 271
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
l !!{. Fkyvtq4CfC, amopposingthe10130AdeIlaProject(tlie 'Project") changing Belo"w,Irave outlinedmyreason,,kopposing andcorresponding requeststoconsider tny opposition:
1. Compreheiisive F,nvironmenUi) Testing:
o i requesthatthe developer conduct a thorough Environmentai Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessxnentshould evaiuate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, iioise pollution, and traffic impacts, I l>elieve that the project shouid not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical' Exemption 'mder section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of tlxeprojectmy resulL irt significatt efl'ect" relating to traffic, noise, ir quality, or water quality. If tliis is not true, I woufd }ike to receive the comprehensive report that proves tlie above untrue.
2. I'ranspareney on Coxitaminatjon Issues:
o l seek detai!ed repom on past contamination ISSUESassociated with the project site and how tbese will be addressed. Specifically, I wotdd like to know what tests will be conducted, whicli substances are of concern, and how clean-up measmes will ensure soif and groundwater safety. As the Gco Tracker does not sliow further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Oiigoing Enviromnental Monitoring:
o } proposethe establishmentof a plan for ongoin@ enviro.nincntal monitoring throughout the constructioii and operational phabs. This plan should outline how soil vapormonitoring wUl be coziducted post-construction aiid include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting tl'ie health of children, 'vulnerable populatioxis, and all community members is of utmost importance,
4, Aecountability in Decision-Jl4aking:
o l request the establishment of a community advisory board tliat includes residents, environtnental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental upects of (.heproject, This will ensure accountability aiid provide residents with a voice ixi monito.iing tlie project's impacts.
5. Ade}]aAve.ConereteBarrjer(KRail)toremaininplace:
o l strongly ur'ge the city to keep the K rail closed to all ta'ffic. Rernoving the K barrier wilt tike!y lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading airquality.
Irequest a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potentiat healtli impacts Oil residents. Additiona!ly,Jadvocate for noise leve) testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Bngaging health and envirotunental experts to analyze these impacts is essetttial.
r tust that you will give these concems the attention they deserve.
IL/t';7 '
/'?er<A 5; z-o2r
Dote:
253 272
OPPOSITTON TO 10130 ADELI,A PROJECT
Project") Below, Thave outfined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing iny opposition:
1. Co'mprehensive Enviromnental Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct atliorougl'i Environinental Impact Assessment (HIA) l>eforethe Project is approved. 'I'his assessn'ientshould evaluate all potential environmettta] effects, inc)uding air qriality, noise pollution, and traffic iinpacts, l believe tltat the project should not ire qualified asexcmpt under CEQA Categorical Exemption 'iinder section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approvat of the project may result in significant effects rclating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, Swould iike to receive the comprehensive repoit that proves the above untrua
2, Transparency on Contaminatjon Issues:
0 I Seekdetailed REPORTSall ]')actcontamniation lSStleSassoctatedWith the project Site and110Wthese wili be atklressed. Specifically, I wouid }ike to know what tests will be coxiduc(cd, which substaxtcesare of concern, and liow ciean-up measutes wil} ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sliow further testing done after 8!'17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environriieutal Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plati for ongoing erivironmental monitoring throughout the construction arid operatioxia) pl'iases.Tiiis pkanshouRl oritline how soil vapormonitoring will beconducted post-constructiox'i and include coiitingency plaiis if valior issuesare detectedduring testing at the buiUinB permit stage.
Protecting the lxet'dth of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost ii'>'iportaitce
4. Aceountiibility in Decision-Makixig:
o I request the establishment of a con'in'i*inity advisory board tliat includes residents, environmciital experts, and city officials to oversee the cnvironmenta! aspects of the project. 'l'his will ensure accountabi)ity aiid provide residents with a voice in rrionitoring lhe prt:;ject's impacts.
5. Adella Ave, Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I stiaongly urge the city to keep ilie K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrierwill likely leadto increasedvehicle ei'nissioris,furtl'ier de!acting air quality.
I request acomprehensive air quality assessmentto understand tlie potential health impacts on residents, Additionally,Nadvocate for noise level testing to evaluate tlie effects of incre>tsecttrhtftic flow and for on@oinB n"ionitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is remosied Engaging licalth and cnvironmentaJ experts to analyze theseimpacts is essential.
r
Signa'Uu'e l)p/cq/"br
lS'j 273
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I am opposixig the 10130 Adelia Projccl (the
"Project"5 low, ve outlined my reasor':isfor opposingandcorrespondingrequeststo consider changing my opposition:
1. ComprehensiveEnvironmentslTesting:
o Irequesttbatthectevelopercond'uctatlxorougtiEn'vironmentaltmpactAssessme,nt (EIA) before the Project is approyed. This assessment slioyild evaluate all potential cnvironmental efl'ects, including air quality, noise pollution, aiid traffic impacts. J believe tbat the project sliould not be qyiaJified as exeiwpt under CEQA Categoricat Exemption tu'ider section 15332 (Ciass 32-Developmental Projects). Approyaf of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air qualitv,, or water quality. If this is not true, l would like to receiye, the comprehensive report tliat proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Contaxninatiori Issiiesi
o I seek detailed reports on past contmi'iination issues associated witli the project site and how tl'tese will be addressed Specificallyjwould like to kllOW wliat tests will be conducted, wliich subslax':ices are of concern, and IloW clean-up tneasures will ensure soil and grot.indwater safety. As tlie Geo Tracker does not show further tcstiug done aflex 8/1 7/2021.
3. Ongoing Environineutal Monitoring:
o { propose tlie establishmcnt of a p?an for ongoing environrnentaJ monitoring throughout tlie corxstruction aiid operational phases. Tliis plan sliould outline how soi} vapor rno'iitoring wiit be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detectect during testing at the building permit stage.
Protecting the liealth of children, tt'i!nerabie poputations, atxd aJJ community members is of utmost iinportance.
4. Accountatiiiity in Decision-Making:
o I request the establislunent of a comm'iinity advisory lyoard that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to ovcrsee the environmentaJ aspects of 11xeproject. I'l'iis wi!11 ensure accountability and provide rcsidents witli a voice in n'ionitoring tlic project's impacts.
5. Adella -Aye. Coxicrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in p}ixce:
o r strongly urge tbe city tO kecp the K rail closed to all traffie. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased 'Vehicle emissions, furtl'ier deigrading air quality. l request a comprebensive air quali(y a.ssessrnent to understai'id the potenial liealth in'tpacts oxi residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level test.irig to evaluate the effects of increased (raffic flow mid for ongoing monitoring of air aitd noise polItttion levels 'if the lyarrier is remoyed. Engaging liealtl'i and environmental cxpeits to analyze tliese impacts is essential,
I trust tliat you wiil gi've tliese concerns the attention tl'iey deserve. ]a't'\ I z'-)
Date:
15'5' 274
OPPOSITION TO I0i30 ADELLA PROJECT
changing my opposition:
1. Comprehensive Comrirehensive Environmental '!'es(ing:
o J request tliat tlie deveioper conduct a tlioroyigh Environmental Impact Assessment (BIA) before tlie Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environ.inental ef.fects, including air quality, noise poijution, and traffic impacts. K lieJieve tliat the pm,ject sl'iould not be qualified as exempt inder CEQA Categorica] Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approyal of the prqiect may result ixi significant effects reiating to traffic, noise, air quali(y, or water quality. If this is not true, } would like to receiye the comprehensive report that proyes the above untrue,
2. Traxisparency on Contamination Jssues:
o I seek detailed reports 011 past contamination issues associated with tlie projcct site arid l'iow these will be addressed, Specificafly, I wotrid )ike to know what tests will be conducted, wl'iich substances are of concern, and liow clean-up measures wil} ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the estab)ishmerit of a plan for ongoiiig environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational pliases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are <letected diring testing at the building petianit stage. i)rotecting the liealth of children, yuli"ierabie populations, and all conaimunity members is of utmost impoitance
4. Aceountnliility in Decision-Making:
o I request tlie estabiisl'iment of Elcommunity advisory board that includes residents, environmentaf experts, and city officiats to oversee tlie environmental aspects of the pro3effl.This will ensureaccocintabilityand provide resi<tents with a voice in moititoring ttie project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strong!y y'irgetlie city to keep the K rail closed to all traff-ic.Removin@ the K Liarrier wil.l Iikely Lead to increased vehicle emissions, fuither degrading air quality. :[ request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understai'id the potential health impacts on resirients. Additioiially, Tadvocate for noise le'vel tes(.ing to evaiua[e the, effects of increased traffic flow ai'id for ongoing n'ioniloring of air and noise .polluticm lestels if the bariier is remoyed. Engaging healtl'i and eiwironmental expeia!s 'l:Oanai)7ze [heSe lnlpaCtS IS essentlaL
I trust tha( you wiU give tliese concerns the attention tliey deserve. 9/Z'{ /? J'a
I)ate:
194 275
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el "lProyecto"). A coyitini.iaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para 6pon-erme y ras solicitudes correspondie,ntes para considerar cambtar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desaitollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambienta) (HIA) exhaustiva axites de que se implemente cuafquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe eva)uar todos los posibles efectos anibientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, ta contaminaci6n actistica y los iinpactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no debetta calificar como exen(o bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segun la secci6n J5332 (Cla,se 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrta tener efectos significativos en cl trAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asi, me gustarJa recibir el informe completo qcie lo demuestre.
2. Transparencin sobre ProbJemas de Contan'iinaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobrc problemas de contan'iinaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especfficainente, me gustarfa saber que pniebas se realizarAn, cuAles sustaz':+ciasson preocupai-ites y c6xno las medidas de limpieza asegurarai'+ la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterriea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realiz.adas desput% del l 7/08/2021.
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el estableciiniento de tm plan para el inonitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n, Este plan debe detallar c6mo se rcaiizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despcies de !aconstrucci6n e incluir planes de contin,oencia si se detectai'i problemas de vapor durarite Ja.spruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. l)rot.eger la salud de tos niffios, tas poblaciones vulnerables y lodos los miembros de ia comunidad es de maxima importancia,
4. Responsabilidad en la 'roma dc Decisiones:
o SoJicito el establecimiento cle till consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en n'iedio ambiente y ft.ncionarios de la ciudad para supervisar !os aspectos ambientales dei proyccto. Esto garanti:y.arA la rei"idici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentcs una VOZ en el monitoreo de los i'inpac'l:os del proyecto.
5. La barrera (K Raid) de Adella Ave. permanecer* en su Sugar:
o Uijo encarecidai'nente a la ciridad a maiitener cl K rail cerrado a todo trs'fico.
Le'vantar la barrera dcl K probabletnente conducirA a un aumento en las ei"itisiones de veliiculos, degradando atnt mis la calidad del aire. Soficilo una evaluaci6n integrat de )a calidad del aire para comprent)er los posibles impactos en la salud dc los residentcs. AdcmAs, abog,o por rea)izar pruebas de ni'veles de tuido para evaluar 10S efectos del aumento en el flujo de trAfico y pot un monitoreo continuo de los riiveles de contaminaci6n <lel aire y del ruido si se levaiita la barrera. Hs csencitti involucrar a expertos en salud y rnedio ambiente para anatizar estos impactos.
Confio eii que dai*n n estas preocupaciones la atenci6n qr'ie merecen.
Fecha
'157 276
HOS{CIONALl)ROYECTO€0130ADELLA
(cl"Pr'oyecto"7. A co'fitinuaci6n,ric expciestomis razonesparaoponermey las solicitudes coirespondientes para considerar caxnbiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas AmbientaJes Exliaustivas:
o Soticito que el desarrollador realice una E,valuaci6n de Impacto Ambienta1 (EIA) cxliaustiva axites de que se implemente cuaIquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la ca}idad del aire, la containinaci6n acustica y los irnpactos en el tAfico. Cyeo que el proyecto no deberJa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de Ia CHQA, segun la secci6ril5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos deDesarrol}o), Lit aprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectossi@riificativos en cl trA[ico, el ruido, la calidad del aireo la calidadde)agua,Denoserasf,megustarfarecil:+irel ixiformecomlileto que lo demuestre,
2. Transparencia sobre I)roblemag de Contaniinaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con cl sitio de} proyecto y c6mo se abordar6n. Especfficainente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, cu,31es sustancias son preocupai'ites y c6mo las medidas de ii'inpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrmea. Datlo que el Gco Tracker no muestra prtiebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para el tnoni(oreo ainbientat continuo durai'ste las fases de const'rucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe dctalkar c6mo se tealizarA et monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir plaiies de contingencia si se detecta+i problemas de vapor durante las pruelias en la etapa de permiso de cons!rucci6n. Protcger }El salud de )os niffos, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los mientbros de la comuiidad es de m;axima importancia.
4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Deeisiones:
o Solicito el establecirniento de un consejo asesor comrmitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ainbiei'ite y fui'icionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientates del pro)iecto. Hsto garantizar;i la rendici6n de euentas y brindarA a los residentes una voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.
5. La liarrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave, permanecera en sulugar:
o Urjo encarecidainentc a la ciudad a mantencr el K raik cerrado a todo t'rAfico.
Levantar la barrera del K probalilemente conducir6 El till aumento en Jas emisiones cle yehicu2os, degradai'ido aun mAs la calidad del aire. SoJicito i.ma evaluaci6ri integral de la calidad dei aire para comprendcr 108 posibles impactos en la salud de 105resident('s.Adei'nAs,aboBopor rea)izarprueba.sde niveles deruido para eva!uar (os efectos del agiento en el flujo de Mfico y por an monitoreo continuo de los nivelcs de cont<tminaci6n del aire y dei ruido si se levanta la batrera. Es esencial involucrar a expertos en satud y rnedio ambiente para analizar estos impactos.
Confio en que
Ftrma
a estas preocupacioncs la atenci6n que n'ierecen.
Fecha
l% 277
OPPOSI'ITON 'l'0 10130 ADELLA PROJKCi'
< \Jq axnopposingthe 10I30 Adeila Pro,iect(the
Project") Below, Iha've outlincd my reasons foropposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:
1. Comprebensive Comnrebensive Enviroruneutai Tcstine: Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a tliorough Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before tlxe Project is approved. n'iis assessment should evahiate all potential environ>nental effects, inc)udiitg air quality, ttoise polkttion, aiid traffic impacts. I bciieye that the prqiect shoutdnot be quatifiedas exempt under CEQA Categoricaf Exetnption under section 15332 (Class 32-Deve)opinental Pro.jccts). Approva) of the pmject may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not h'ue, I wioutd tike to receive the compreherisive report that proves the above untrue.
2, Transparency on Contamination Issuesi
o l seek detailed reports on past contamination iSSues associated with the project site mid ltow these will be addressed. Specificaily,iwould kike to kllOW wl'iat tests will be conducted, whicl'i su!istances are of conceri'i, and l'iow cleait-i.tp measures wiil ensure soil ai'id groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show furtlier testing done after 8/17!2021.
3. Ongoing Enviroximental Monitoring:
o J propose the estalilishi'nent of a pltin for ongoiyig environmental monitoring throrigliout the construction and operational pliases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monito'iing will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plaiis if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protectixig the liealth of children, vulnerable populations, ai'id all cominunity members is of utmost importance.
4. AccountaM]ity in Decision-Malcing:
o l request tlie establishment of a community advisory boarc'! tl'iat includes residents, environmenttil experts, and city oflicials to oversee the environmental aspects of tlie project. Ibis will ensure accountalyility and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's i'i'npacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (I( Rail) to remain in place:
o l strongly urge the cit)i to keep the K raif closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle e'inissions, further degrading air quaiity.
I request ;i compreliensive air quality cissessment to understaitd tlxe potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, Tadvocate for noise Jevel testing to evaluate the effects of increased taffic flow ai'id for ongoing monitoring of itir m'id noise pollution levels if tlie barrier is removed. ['aigaging health and environmenta} experts to aiialyze these impacs is essentiat
1 trust that you will give tliese concerns (lie attentiot't they deserve.
Signature
3 ='!'%-'7SDate:
l'n 278
o'yos'ic'i6n AI, PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el "Proye'cfo"), A continuaci6n
correspondientes para corisiderar cambiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que cl desarrollador realice una Evaluacit5n de I:inpacto Ambiental (EIA) exl'iaustiva antes de que se itnplemente cuaiquier unidad autoraatizada. F,ma evaluaci6n de!ye evaluar todos los posib}es efectos ambicntaies, iiicluyendo la calidad del airc, IEIcontaminaci6n ac6stica y los irnpactos en el trAfico. Creo que el pro)iecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Catcg6rica de la CEQA,seg'(mlasecci6n 15332(Clase32-Proyectosdel)esarrollo).Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el Mfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad de] agua. De no ser asf, me gust!ia recibir el informe compJeto que to demuestre.
2. Transparcncia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
c:i Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6u sinteriores asocihidos con el sitio del proyecto y (,6mO se abordarAn. F)spec(f-xcamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pniebas se realizarii, cuAles sustaiicias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarAn Ia seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracke; no muestra pruebas adicioxiales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo cl establecimiei'ito de un ):ilaii para el inonitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y opetaci6n. Estc plan debe detailar C611'l0se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contirigencia si sc detectaii problemas de vapor duraiite las pruebas en Ja etapa de permiso de const'rucci6n, l)roteger la salad de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnembles y todos los miembros de }a corminidad es de mA'xima importancia,
4. Responsnbilidad en lh l'oma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que inchiya a residentes, expei'tos en medio ambiente y fxcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar ios aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto gara'i'itizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y tn:ixidarA a 103 tesidentes una voz, en cl monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.
5. La barrera (K Raid) de Adella Ave. pcrmanecer* en su }ugar:
o Urjo cncarecidamente a la ciutlad a mantener cl K rai) cerrado a todo tr,:tfico, Levantar la barrera del K lirobabtemente conducirA a un aunnenlo en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradando ai:in rubs ia calidad del aire. Solicito yma c'valiaci6n integral de la catidad del =iire para com,prender los posibles impactos en la sahad de ios residentes, AdemAs, abogo pot realizar pruebas de niveies <le ruido para evaluar Los efectos del aumento en cl flujo de trAfico y por un monitoreo contiruto de los niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y dei ruido si se levanta la barrera. Es esencial itrvolucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para anal'izar estos impactos, CO]lflO ell qllO darAtl Et eStaSpreocupaciones la atenci6n qlle IIleTeeen. !-Z'l -2SFecha
"2JJG' 279
OPOSICI('N AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
Yo MAri(y 'S'(an?<ile,,-c O- ,a
correspondientes
(el"Proyecto"), A
para
continuaci6n,
considerar
he
cambiar
cx!!sto
n'ii oposici6n:
x'Thrazoiiespl'aeraoopOlolHoeramlePy1otyaes"s'
della
1. Pt'uebas Ainbtenlales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador reatice upa Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental BIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cuatquier unictad automatizada. Esta evatuaci6n debe evatuar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la catidad del aire, la contaminaci6n ac'hsticn )i 10S irnpactos en el trafico. Creo que el proyecto no deberta calificar como cxento bajo la Hxenci6n Categ6rica cle la CBQA, seg €ui la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos deDesarrollo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrta tener efectos signi'ficati'vos en el tAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asi, me gustaria recibir el ixiforme completo que lo demuestre.
2. Transparencia sol>re Problemas de Contami'naci6n:
o Busco inforines detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n antericres asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificamente, me gustarfa saber qu6 prb'iebas se rca}izaran, cuAles sustancias son prcocupantes y c6mo las medidas de liinpieza tisegurarAii la seguridad del suelo y del agua subtcrrAnea, Dado que el Geo Tracker; 110 muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021,
3. Mouitoreo Amlyiental Continuo:
o Propongo el estableciniiento tie un plan para cl monitoreo ainbiental c<:intinuo durante L.S fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de yapor de suelo <lespu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectaii problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de constiticci6n. Proteger la salu<l de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos 103 miembros de la cormmidad es de rnAxima importancia.
4. Reslionsubilidad en la Toma del)ecisiones:
o Solicito ei establecimiento cje Llll consejo asesor comunilario que inc!uya bt residentes, expertos en n'>edio ainb'ientc y funcionarios de la ciuda<? para supervisar los a@ectosainbientalesdel proyecto.nsto garantizarAla rendici6n CICcuentasy brindarAa108 residerrtesunavoz enel monitorco delos imliactos del proyecto.
5. I..ia barrera g( Raid) de Adella Ave, perntanecerh en su lugaaa:
o Urjo encarectc!amenle a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo tr6fico. Le'vantar la barrera del K probablemente condrtcirA a un aurnento en las emisiones de vchfculos, deg,radando ai:u'i rubs la calidad de] aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral deia calidaddel ttii'e paracomprenderlos I:iosi'blesin'ipactosenla sakudde loOSsrc7L,iCdeonbtH,.11,:ldlne7e:0, ::=i';:j',;':ifflffi,;C:'l;:::3ffll:i;::ffl ==,'.,':',:':l';,a; niveles de contaminaci6n dei aire y de! ruido si se }evarita la barrera. Es esencial ixiyotucrar a expertos en salcid y medio ambieiite para analizar estos impactos.
Confio en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la alenci6n q-ue mcrecen.
Firma Fecl"ia
zul 280
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
fgfeS am opposing the !0430 Adella Ptoject (the
chatiging my oppositiori:
1. Comprehensive Envtronniental Testiitg:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentallrnpactAssessment (EIA) before tl'ie Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, includixig air quality, noise pollution, andtraffic impacts.I believe that tl'ie project should not be qualified as exempt underCEQACategorical Exemption under section !5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects).Approval of the project niay result in sigruficaitt effects relating to traffic. noise, air quality, or water quality. If tlxis is not true, I would like to receive the cornprebensivereport that proves the above untrue.
2. Transparency on Coxitamination ISsues:
o I seclc detailed reports on pa.t;tcontainination issues associatedwtth the project site and how these wiil be addtessed, Specifically, [ woukl iike to know what testswill be conducted, winch substances are of concern, and how clsan-up measureswill ensure soi} and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testiiig doi'ie after &/f7/2021.
3. Ongotng Environmental Monitoring:
0 I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental rnonitoting througbout the coiistruction and operational phases. This plan should outline how soil yapor monitoring wiii be conducted post-construction and iriclude contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.
Pmtecting tlie healtli of children, vuliierab}c populations, and all community members is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability tn Decision-Making:
o I request the establishinent o.t"acoinmtnity advisory board that inc.ludes residents, environmental experts, at"id city officials to oversee tl'ie environn':iental aspects of the project. This wili ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring llie project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in lilace:
o I strongly urge tlye city to keep the K rail closed to akl traffic, Removing the K barrier will likeiy lead to increased vehicke emissions, fiirther degrading air quality.
Xreqriest a comprehensive air quality assessmentto iinderstand the potential !tealth impacts on residerits. Additionally, J advocate for noise level testing to evacuate tl'ie effects of increased traf:ic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air axid noise potlution levels if the bairier is removed. Engaging health aiid environmental expeits to analyze these impacts is esseyitial.
l trust that you will give these concerns the attention they deserve.
Signature Date:
'3}az=4).qozv
281
oposxcx6n.u puoyxcro 10130 ADRLLA
Yo JE7t2i'!:t-) Cb9!tAS meopongoalProyecto 10130Adella
(el"Proyecto"), A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes corzspondientes para considerar carnbiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas.
o Solicito (lit(, eeldesarrollador realice una EvaJuaci6nde Impacto Ambierttal (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se imptemente cualquier unidad automatizada. E,sta evaluaci6n dcbe evaluar (odos !os posibles efectos anibientales, incluyendo la ca}idad del aire, la contaminaci6nac€istica y los impactos en ei trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de !a CEQA, seganlasecci6n 15332 (Clase32 - ProyectosdeDesarrollo). Laaprobaci6n del liroyecto po<lrfatener efectossignificativos en el trAfico, el iido, la calidad dei aire o la caJidaddeTagua, De no yr asf, me gustarfa recibir el informe cornpleto que io dernuestre.
2. Transpareneja sobre l)roblemas de Coiitarnipiaei6n:
o Busco informes detalJados sobre problemas de contamiiiaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordar6n. Especificamente, me gust!fa saber qu6 pruebas se realizaran, cuales sustancias son preocupaiites y c6mo }as medidas de Iimpieza asegurartln Ja seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrmea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no inuestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s de} 17/08/2021.
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Coxitinuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para cl moxiitorco ambiental continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6ri. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se. reaIizd el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s <tela construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se ctetecttui problen"ias de vapor dtirante las pruebas en la etapa de peimiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los nifios, la.s poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la cori'iunidad es de rnAxinia impoxtancia,
4. Responsabi}idad en ja Tomn de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un conscjo asesor comui'iitario que inc]uya a residentes, ex.pertos en inedio ai'nbiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supei'visar 10S aSpeCtOSambientales del prOyeCtO. BStO gEu!11tiZarA la rcndiCl6n de OuelltaS :Y brindarA a !os tesidentes una VO7, en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyccto.
5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adel)a Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a n'iantener el K rai) cerrado a todo trAfico.
Le'vantar la barrera del K probab)en'iente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de velirculos, degradando atin mis la calidad del aire, Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprender108 posibles imIiactos en la salud de los residentes. Adem6s, abogo por realizar pruebas de nivclcs de ruido para evaluar los efectos del aumento en cl flujo da trAfico y por un n'ionitoreo continuo de kos niveles de contanxinaci6n del airc y del ruido si se levatita la barrera. Us escncial invoiucx"ar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos.
Conflo en que daran a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que nterecen, '3/zt41>o:zs
lu'3 282
OPOSIaON AL PRO\ECTO 10130 ADELLA
correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Amtxientales Exiiaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Bsta eva!uaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos anibientales, inctuyendo la catidaddeI aire, la contaminaci6n actistica y los impactos enel trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberia calificar como exento baio Ja Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segunla secci6nl5332 (CJase32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfatener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la ca}idad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir el inforrne completo que io demuestre,
2. Transpareneia sobre Problemas de Coritaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contatninaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificarnerite, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se rea}izari'i, cuAles sustancias son preocupai'xtes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurari fa seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que ei Geo 'lI'racker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del I 7/08/2021,
3. Monitoreo Ambjental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de, un plan para el monitoreo ambienm continuo durante las fascs de consttucci6n y operaci6n Este plan debe detailar c6mo se i'ealizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir plarles de contingencia si se detectan probtemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de Jos nii'ios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es da m{ixima importaiicia,
4. Responsabi}idadenlaTon'iadeDecisioues:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un coi'isejo asesor conaiunitario que ii'tcluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y ftuicionios de la ciudad para supervisar 10S aspectos ambientales del prO'yecto. aEStOgarai'itizarA la rendiciOn de CuentaS Y brindarA a los residentes una voz ext el monitoteo de ios irnpactos del proyecto.
5. La barrera (K Raij) de Adeila Ave. permaneeera en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a }a ciudad s rnantener el T( rail cerrado a todo trAfico.
I,evantar la barrera det K probabtemente conducirA a uxi aumento en las etnisioxies de vehfculos, degradando aun rubs la calidad de) aire, Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de laca}idad del aire para comprcnder 10S posibles in'ipactos en la salud de los residentes. Ademas, abogo por realizar pruebas de ni'veles de ruido para evaluar los efectos del aumeuto en el flujo de tr',-ifico y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveies de contarninaci6n de) aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera. Es escncia} involucrar a expertos en salad y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos.
Confio en qxie darAri a estas prcocttpaciones la atenci6n que merecen. "'4. (=. o"7<%0i z-l'ZtffZ("'
2u'l 283
OPOSJCION AL PROYECTO lOi30 ADkLLA
corrcspondientes para considerar canibiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Arnbientales Exhuustivas:
o Soiicito que el ttesarro}ladoc realice una Evaluaci6n de Irnpacto Arnbientai (E,IA) exhaustiva arxtes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6i':xdcbe evaluar todos Jos posib)es efectos ainbientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acusticay los impactos en el trAfico, Creo que el proyecto no deberJa calificar corno exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segun lasecci6nl5332 (Ciase32- Proyectos deDesarro}lo). I,aaprobaci6n del proyectopodriatenerefectos significativosenel trafico, el ruido, lacalidaddel aire o la calidad del agua. De rio ser asi, n'ic gustarfa recibir el inforrne completo que lo <ternuestre.
2. Transparencia sobre Problemss de Contaminaei6n:
o Buscoinformesdetallados sobre problemas de contarninaci6n aiiteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordari, Especificamente, me gustaria saber qu6pruebas se realimAn, cufves sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo kasmedidas de Jimpieza asegurari la seguridad dcl suclo y del aguasubterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muemra pruebas adicionates realizadas despu6sdel l 7/08/2021. 3- Monitoreo Amliiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plari para el monitoreo a'mbiental continuo durante }as fases de conshucci6n y opcraci6n Este plan debe detallar c6mo se reaiizatA el monitoreo devaporde suelo despu6sdela construcci6n e iricluir pianes de contingencia si se detectan probiemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de peririiso de constucci6n. Proteger la salud de }os nirios, )as poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros dela comunidad esdetnAxima importaucia. 4, Responmbilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor cori'iunitario que inc}uya a residentes, expertos en medio annbientey funcionarios de la ciudad para supcrvisar 108aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garaittizarA ia rcndici6n de cuentas y brindara a los residentes unayoz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto,
5. La bnrrerb (K Raid) de AdeJ}a Ave. pernxaxiecera en sti lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a Ja ciuclad a rnantener el K raii cerrado a 'iodo trAfico.
Levantg la barrera del K probablernente conducira a yuiaumerito en las en'iisiones de vehfculos, degradando aun mAs la cahdad'del aire, Solicito una evaluaci6n integra} de la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles a los residentes. Ademt's. abogo por reaJizarpruebas denivelefisieacrfu0isdoenpalayase 108efectos del aumento gi el flujo de trAfico y por un monitoxeo continuo de108 nive{as de contaminaci6n tlel aire y de} ruido si se levanta la barrera. Es esencial invoJucrar a expertos en sa)ud y medio ambiente paraana!izar estos impactos.
Confio en que darm a estas pyeocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen. 7==,=9 O) / a0,/co 7,S
1V5 284
oposxcx9wALpnyyxcro10130ADELLA
rmhgl
expuesto
correspondientes para considerar canibiar mi oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (E'fA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evatuaci6n debe eyah'iar todos }os posibles efectos arnbientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que et proyecto no deber{a calificar como exento bajo la :Exenci6n Categ6rica de lea CEQA, segtui lasecci6n 15332 (Cease32 - Proyectos deDesairollo). I,a aprobaci6n adl:,lpOrolyaeccitolldpaoddrdfaelteangclrlaefDecetonsos!ignliafiScl:i que lo demuestre.
2. Transparencia sobre Pro'blemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco iriformes detallados sobre problemas de contaminacibn aiiteriores asociados con el si(io del proyecto y c6mo se abord,arAn.Bspecificarnente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se rea)izaran, cuAles susta>icias son preocupantes y como )as medidas de limpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del sueio y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionaies realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.
3. Monitoreo Atnbiental Conti:nuo:
o Propongo cl establecimiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambicntal coxttiriuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe deta)Jar c6mo se realizarA el rnonitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s dc (a construcci6n e incluir planes de coiitingencia si se detectan pmblemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de consttucci6n, Proteger la sa}ud de los .i'iifios, las poblaciones vuJrierables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de inAxima importancia, 4, Responsabilidad en la Toma de l)ecisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y funcionaiios de ia ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambiei'i(ales dei proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindara a !os residentes una voz en el monitoreo da los impactos del proyecto,
5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a ka ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico.
I.,evantar la baiareradel K probablemente conducirA a un auineiito en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradaiido aGn mis la calidad del aire, Solicilo una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles i'i'i'ipactos en la salud de los residentes. Ademas, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar los c[ectos del aumento an el flujo de tr6fico y por un monitoreo continrio de los niveles de contan'iinaci6n del aire y de! ruido si se levanta la barrera. Es escncial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para analizar estos impaclos.
ConfYo eri que dai*'i a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n qtie merecen. ,3 2-'-1-:xs
11J(/ 285
OPPOSJIiONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
chaiiging my opposition:
1. Comiyrehensive Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentaiNmpactAssessment (EIA) beforethe Pro5ectis approved,'l'h3sassessmeiyt should evaluate alJ potential environmenta! effects, including air qua}ity, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe tliat tlte projcct should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water qriality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above uritrue.
2. Transparency on Contamination Issued:
o Iseekdetailedreportsonpastcontaminat:ionissuesassociate<Twitlitheprojectsite and how tl'iese will be addressed, Specificatly,Iwouid like to know what tests wili be conctucted, which substances are of concem, and how clean-up measures will ensure soi) and groundwater safety- As the Geo Tracker does riot show fuither testiixg ctone aficr 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring tliroughout the coiistrt.iction and operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wig}be conducted post-coi'istruction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building pern"iit stage, Protecting tlte heaitli of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance.
4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o l request the establishme:rvt of a community advisory board tl'iat iricl'ides ivsidcnts, eIl'/ll'Vll]llelltal OXpeltS, an(4 Cl't9 0ffiaal€ll!> tO OVefN(C! tll( cnvironniental aspect!!> at' the project. This will ensure accountability and provide reside.nts with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I stronglyurgethecity to keep the K rail closed to il traffic. Removing tlte K bai'rier will iikely ieadto increased vehicie emissions, fuither degrading air quality. irequestacomprehensiveair quality assessinentto tmderstand the potential healt?i impactsonresidents.Additionally,Ladvocatefor noise le'vel testingto evaluatetl'ie effectsof increasedtraffic flow and for ongoing rixonitoring of air arid noise pollutionlevelsif fl'ie barrieris removed.Engaging health and environmeixtal experts to analyze these impacts is essential,
I trustthatyouwill Bive these concerns the attention they deserve. 8Sg!:ux/!:"'/l"'l:)" Date:
286
01)POSJTION TO 70130 ADEI,LA PROJECT
I Leaik % amopposiiig(he tOl30AdellaPm,ject(the
Project") Befow, I have outlincci my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changirxg my opposition:
1. Comprejiensive Environmental Testing:
o irequeSttylattheaeVet0per00l1atlCtathOrOughpllVirOllnlCntannlpaCthSSessrnent (EIA) before the Project is approved. Tliis assessnient should evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise poJlu(ion, and trafY'ic impacts. l believe tliat the project shoal<? not l'ie qualifietl as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption rii'i<ter section l 5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project inay result in significarit effects retating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. ):f this is not true, I would like to receiye tlie coiriprehensive report tliat proves the above untrue,
2. Transparency on Contaanination issues:
o I seek detailed reports 011past contamination ISSUESassociated witli tlie project site and liow these will be addressed, Specifically, I would iike to know what tests will be conducted, whicl'i substatices are of concenai, and how cleai'i-up measures wi'il ensure soil and groundwater safety. As tJxe Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3. Ongoing Enviromnental Monitoring:
o I propose tl"ie establishinem of a plan for ongoing eiivironmemal monitoring throughout the construction a.x'idoperational phases. This plan should <:iut)ine how soil vapor.monitorin@ wilt be co.i'iducted post-construction aiid inchide contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protectirig thc healtli of cliildren, siulnerable liopulations, aiid all community members is of utmost in"ipoitancc.
4. Accouritability in Decision-Making:
o { requcst the cstablisliment of a commut'iity advisory board that includes residents, environinental experts, aiid city officials to oversee tlie environmental aspccU of t}re projec(. 'rliis will ensure accountability aixd provide residents witJi a voice ixi monitoring tlic projcct's iinpacts.
5. Adelja Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain i.n place:
o I strongly xirge the city to keep the K i-ail dosed Coall traffic, Removing the K l'>arrier will Jikely kead to ii:icreased vehicie emissiot"is, fuither degrading air quality.
I request a comprehei'isivc air quality assessn'ient to understand the poteiitial health impacts on residents, Additionatky, I advocate for noise level testii'xg to evaluate thc effects of increased traffic flow ani:t for ongoing monitoiing oJaair ai'id noise pollution levels if tl'ie barrier is rei'itoved. nnBaginB health and environmental experts to analyze tl'iese iinpacts is essemial.
Itrust tliat you witl Bive (hesecoi'icerns tits attention they deserve. ture
3-:1 €4-:Lbg..5'
Date:
lub 287
OPOSICI('N AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
correspondientes para consider! cambiar mi oposici6n:
1. Ptuelyas Amlitentales Exhaustivas:
o Sokicito que el desarro}lador reatice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambientai (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se imp)emente cualquier unidad automatizada. Bsta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibies efectos ambientales, incluyendo }a calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acdstica y tos impactos en cl trThfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo !a Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtui la secci6n 15332 Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrta tei'ier efectos significativos en el trffico, el mido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asf, mei gustai{a recibir el informe completo que lo dernuestre.
2. Transparencia sobre Prob!emas de Contaniinaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contmninaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificaritente, me gustaxoiasaber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, cuales sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las mcdidas de limpiez;'a asegurarAn ta seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Cleo Tracker no muestra pnxebas adicionales rea}izadas despu6s del l 7/08/2021.
3. Monitoreo A'mbiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de till plan para el monitoreo ainbiental continuo durante ?as fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este pian debe detallar c6mo se realiz,ars4el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e ineluir planes de contingencia si se deectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de conslrucci6n, Proteger la sa)ud de 108 nirios, }as poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comttnidad es da maxima importancia.
4. Responsnbi}idad cn la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el estab)ecimienlo de un conse,jo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio arnbiente y funcionarios da ka ciudad para supervisar los aSpeCtOSambientales c'lel proyecto. Rsyo garantizara la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una VO2en e.l monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto. 5, La barrera (K Raid) de AdeHsi Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico.
Levantar la barrera del K probablemeinte coriducirA a un at.mxento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradando aun inks la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integrat de la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos cn la saiud de los residentes. AdemAs, abogo por realiy,ar pruebas de niveles de iido para evaluar }os efectos del aumento en el flujo de trAfico y por un inonitoreo continuo de tos niveles de contai'ninaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera. Es escncial involucrar a expertos en satud y medio anibiente para aiializar estos impactos.
Confio en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.
F41rma"%,r,v,(4i(,0'/'4z 3- g4 - p.=;-
Feclia
288
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
Yo C'/ /OS"AIFfe d"O 'Jt'2zqtA!;Z- meopongoalProyectolOl30Adella (el "Proyecto"), A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar rni oposici6n:
1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador reatice una Evaluaci6ri cte Impacto Ambiental ElA) exhaustiva antes da que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe e'valuar todos 108 posibles efectos ainbien(ales, incluyendo ka calidad del aite, lacontaxninaci6n acGstica y los impactos en el trAfico, Creo que el proyecto no deberta calificar como exento bajo la Bxenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segun iasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrolto). Laaprobaci6n detproyecto podria tener efectos significatiyos en el trAfico, el ruido, la calidad aet aire o }a calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir el informe compieto que lo demuestre.
2. Transpaiocxicia sobre Problemas de Contamit'isicN6n:
o Busco infoimes deta!lados sobre problexnas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6n'io se abordarAn Especfficamente, me gustarta saber (lLl6 pruebasserealizarh, cuAlessustariciassonprcocupantesy c6mo las n'iedidtts de limpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del sueto y del agua subterrffiea, Dado que el Geo Tracker 110 muestra pmebas adicionales rea)izadas despu6s del }7/08/2021.
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para et rnonitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n, Este pian di,be detallai' c6mo se rea}izara el moniloreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contirigencia si se detectai'i problemas de vapor dtuaaitte las pruebas en }a etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y lodos los miembros dc la comunidad es de maxima importancia.
4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decistones:
o Solicito d establecimiento de ITII consejo asesor comunitgio que incluya a rcsideyites, expertos en :inedio ambiente y funcionarios de ia ciudaa para supei-visar Jos aspectos ainbieritalcs del proyecto. Esto garanti:mrA la rendici6n de cuentas y - brindarA a los residerites una VOZ en el n'ionitoreo de los impactos del proyecto. 5, La barrera (K Raid) de Adella Ave, permanecerA en su lugar:
o Utjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a mantcrier el K rail cerrado a iodo trAfico.
Levamarta barreradei K lirobable.inente conducirAa un aumentoen las cmisiones de vchicuios, degradaiido a0n rubs la calidad del airc. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de IEIcalidad del aire para comprender ios posililes impactos en la salud de Ios residentes, Aden'iAs, abogo porrea}izar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evalt'iar los efectos del aumento an el flujo de trA'fico y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de coi'itaminaci6n del aire y del i'uido si se levanta la barrera. ES esencia} invo)ucrar a expertos en salud y medio anxbierite para analizar estos impactos.
Confio ax"ique daran a estas preocupaciones la atcnci6n que rnerecen. 2'{ 2,S"
Firma Fecha
'110 289
OPPOSITION TO iOl30 ADELLA l)ROJECT
4!az.'R'ye< amopposingthelOf30AdeJlaProject(the "Project") Be!ow, l have oittlined my reasorxs for opposing and corresponding reqtiests to consider changing my oppositioii:
1. Comprehensive Comnrehensive Environmentnl Testim: Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathorougltEnviror'irnentallmpactAssessment (EiA) before the Project is approyed. Tltis assessment should evahtate all potentia} environmenta} effects, including air quality, noise polhttion, and tuffic impacts. l believelhatthe project shouJdnotbeqtiali&d asexemptunderCEQA Cate@orical Exemptiori under section 55332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of the project may result in significam effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not tiaue, I would like to receive the compreliensive report that proves tlte above tititrue.
2. Transpareticy on Contamitiation Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination isSues associated with tl'ie project site and liow these winkbe addiaessed. Specifically, I would like to ki'iow what tests will be conducted, wbich substai'>ces are of concern, and how cleaii-up measures wi}] ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does xiot SIIOW fiuther testing done after 8/17/2021,
3. Ongoing Enviroiimental Monitoring:
0 I propose tlie establishn'ient of a plai'i for ongoing enviromnental monitoring throughout the construction mid operatioiiak phases. This plan s}iould outtine IIOW soil vapormoxiitoring will be conducted post-constiauction and include contingency ptans if vapor issues are detected during testiiig at the building permit stztge.
Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, aiid all comn'iunity men'ibers is of utiaiiost importaiice.
4. Accountabtlity in Decision-Making:
o I request tlie establishment of a comi'nunity advisory board that iricludes residents, environn-iental experts, axid cit'y officials to OVei'See t}ie environmental aspects of the project. Ttxis will enstn'e accountability and proyide residents with a voice in monitoring tlie project's impacts.
5. Adelta Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removirig the K baiaiier wil! likely iead to increased vehicle emissions, fuither degrading air quality.
I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to xmderstand the potentiat health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate f'or noise level testing to evaluate tlie effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if thc lyarrier is removed. Engagiiig health and environmental exper(s to ai'ialyze tl'iese impacts is essential.
I trust tliat youa-wili.g'ive these concerns the attentiori they deserve. ,i[zy{r:.vz,.,5
Sigriature Date:
l'l ( 290
OPOSICION AL PROYF.CTO 10130 ADELLA
yolAi?yti>&fg-S meopongoatl"roycctotOj30Adclla (el "Proyecto"). A co'ntinuaci6n- he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y Jas solicitudes correspondicntes para considerar canibiar mi oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Ainlyientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador reatice una Bvatuaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. 13sta evaluaci6n debe evaJuar todos los posibles efectos ambienta}es, incluyendo Ja calidad del airs, Ia contaminaci6n acrtstica y los impactos en ei trhfico. Crco que el proyec[o no debeiia ca!ificar como exento bajo la T':xenci6ii Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtin la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarro!lo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podria terier efectos significativos en cl trAfico, el ruido, la caJidad del ire o Ja caJidad del agua. Dc no ser asf, me gustaria recibir ei informe completo que Io demueste.
2, Transparencia sobre Problemas de Coutaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sob're problemas de contaminaci6n ayiteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6rno se abordaran. Especfficamerite, me guslarta saber qu6 pruebas se realizarm, cables sustancias soti preocupaxites y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurar,i la segtnffldad dci suelo y del agua subterrAnea, l)ado que cl Geo 'f'racker no rnuestra piebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.
3. Monitoreo Ambiental Contin'uo:
o Propongo el establecin'iiento de t'in p]an para el monitoreo ambiental continuo duratxte las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plaii debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluirplaiies de contingencia si se ttetectan prob)emas de vapor durante }as pruebas en la etapa r:le permiso de construcci6n. Proteger )a salud de los nifios, las polr}acioxies vuhierables y todos los rniembros de la comunidad es de rtAxima importancia.
4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el estableci:iniento de un conscjo asesor cornunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y fincionarios de la ciudad pura super'visar los aspectos ai't'ibientales del proyecto. E:S10 garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecio. 5, La liarrera (K Rail) de Adejla Ave. perinanecerA en su lugar:
o Ur,io encarecidarncntc a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trffico. Levantar la barrera del K lirobabtemente conducitA a un aumentoen las cmisiones de siel'ifcuJos, degradaxido atui mis la calitlad deJ aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire liara coinpreiidcr los posibles impactos ei'i la salud de !os residentes. AdernAs, abogo por rcatizar pruebas de niveles de niido para eva1uar k:is efectos del arunento en el flujo de trAfico y por un moniloreo continuo de los nivelcs de contarnirtaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levax"ita Ja barrera. Es esencial involucrar a expertos en saLud y medio ambiente pata analizar estos impactos.
Confio en que dar6n a estas preocupaciones ia atenci6n que merecen.
Firma(I" Fecha
3At7rk
291
OPOSICTON AL PROYECTO 10130 Al)ELLA
corresp6ndientes para considerar carri6iar mi oposici6n:
1. l)ruebas AmbientaJes Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desmollador realice una Evaluaci6ii da lmpacto Annbientai (EIA) exliaustiva antes de que se imp)emente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaei6n tlebe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acmtica y los impactos en el trAfico. Cteo que ei proyecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Exettci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, seg6n la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - l)royeetos de Desarrol}o). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos sigi'iificativos en e] trAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me @tistarfa recibir el informe cornpleto que lo demuestre.
2. Transparencia sobre Probletnas cle Contaminaei6n:
o Busco irformes detallados sobre problemas de containinaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6ino seabordaioAn.Especfficarnente,me @ustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarhn, cuhles sustaiicias son preocupantes y c6ino Jas medidas de!in'ipieza ase@urarAn Ia seguridaddel sueloy del ag'ua sub(errAnea.Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del l 7/08/2021
3. Mon'htoreo Ambieutal Contixitio:
o I)ropongo el establecimicnto de un plan para et monitoreo ambiental contimio drtra'iite )as fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detal!ar c6mo se rcaLizarA el monitoreo da vapor de suelo despt6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problcmas de vapor durante Jas pruebas en la etapa de permiso da coristrucci6n. Proteger ?a salxid de los nirios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de mAxima irnportaricia.
4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Soiicito el establecimicnto de un consejo asesor cormmitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y fiu'icionarios de la ciudad para supervisar Jos aspectos ambientales del proyecto, Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes uiia voz en e} monitoreo d;a108 impactos del proyecto.
5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. periniinecerh en su lugar:
o Urjo encai'ecidarriente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a (odo trAfico Levai'xtar la l';iarrera del K probablemerxte conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vel'iiculos, degradando atyn mAs la calidad del aire. Solicito una svaliiaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprender tos posibles impactos en la salud de JoSresidentes. AdemAs, abogo por reaJizarpruebas de nive)es <teruido paraevatuar los efcctos del aunnento en el flujo de trThco y por un rnonitoreo continuo de Ios niveles de contaminaci6n da! aire y del ruido si se levai'ita la barera. Us esencial involucrar a expertos en safud y rnedio ambiente para axializaia estos impactos.
Confio en que darAna estaspreocul:iacionesla at.enci6nque merecen.
F6clia
)1) 292
Attachment D
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF SOUTH GATE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
GATE, CALIFORNIA, REVERSING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND DENYING VESTING TENT ATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84531
WHEREAS, Nick Patterson, on behalf of City Ventures (the "Applicant"), filed a complete application requesting approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map ("TTM") to allow the subdivision of one parcel into 54 condominium units in coru'iection with a proposed residential development located at 10130 Adella Avenue (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project site comprises approximately 2.02 acres, identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 6221-026-020, and is located within the Industrial Flex ("IF") zone of the Tweedy Boulevard Specific Plan ("TBSP") area; and
WHEREAS, the Project involves new construction of 54 residential condominium units (for sale), comprising three-story attached townhomes in six buildings, and six (12 percent) of the units will be provided to moderate-income buyers; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to South Gate Municipal Code ("SGMC") Section 12.10.060, the Vesting TTM shall be heard by the Planning Commission at a scheduled hearing; and action shall be taken to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove such TTM; and WHEREAS, The Planning Cornrnission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the matter on March 18, 2025, and after considering a presentation by the Con'ununity Development Department and listening to public comments, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2025-03 to approve Vesting TTM No.84531; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, an appeal was filed by Jose Morales ("Appellant"), on behalf of South Gate Progress Partners, challenging the Planning Commission's decision to approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531 and to classify the project as categorically exempt from CEQA; and
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2025, this City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the matter, at which this Council considered information presented by the Cornrnunity Development Department, Applicant and Appellant, and listened to public comments about the issue. Notice of the hearing was originally posted and published in the "South Gate Press" newspaper and was mailed to surrounding properties on May 15, 2025. 1 171'( 293
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby declare that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION2. AfterconsideringtheinformationandcommentspresentedattheMay27,2025, City Council hearing on this matter, this City Council hereby resolves to reverse the action taken by the Planning Commission on March 18, 2025, and denies Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.8453 1 based on the following findings:
@ The issues raised in the appeal regarding traffic and pedestrian safety, including those related to the proximity ofthe Project to Legacy High School and Condition No. 60, present substantial evidence of a significant environmental impact under CEQA. * A Class 32 Categorical Exemption does not address traffic and pedestrian impacts generated by the proposed project and does not properly mitigate traffic impacts to neighboring residences.
* Findings previously made by the Planning Commission in support of the Project and environmental determination are insufficient to support approval of the Project.
SECTION 3. The City Council does hereby declare that if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution or its application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Resolution would be declared invalid or unconstitutional. [The remainder of this page left blank intentionally]
2 294
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution which shall be effective upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 27th day of May 2025.
CITY OF SOUTH GATE:
BY:
Maria Davila, Mayor
ATTEST:
B7:
Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
B7: RS)!!E!2yAttorney
3 295
Attachment E
Ciffl of South Gate
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENIDA IBT'[TlT[,
For the Regular Meeting of: March 18, 2025
SeniorPlanner: & PlanningManager:
RodrioPe J
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map No. 84531
PROJECT PROPOSAL/REQUEST
Consideration of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to allow the subdivision of one parcel into a 54- unit residential condominium development located at 10130 Adella Avenue, within the Industrial Flex (IF) zone in the Tweedy Boulevard Specific Plan.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
* General Plan Designation: Industrial
* ,: Tweedy Boulevard Specific Plan (TBSP); Industrial Flex (IF) * Project Location: 10130 Adella Avenue
* Assessor's Parcel Number: 6221-026-020
* : Nick Patterson (City Ventures), on behalf of South Gate I Inv, LLC
BACKGROUND
Site Characteristics: The subject property is a vacant lot measuring approximately 2.02 acres, located at the intersection of Adella Avenue and Legacy Lane, within the Tweedy Boulevard Specific Plan area. The subject site is a relatively flat, rectangular shaped undeveloped propeity, and primarily comprised of ruderal vegetation and coarse fill. Fencing currently surrounds the subject site.
Surroundings: The site is surrounded by a mix of residential, commercial, and institutional uses, with Adella Avenue and Legacy Lane providing primary access. Legacy High School and the Legacy High School Softball Fields are located directly north of the subject property, across the street from Legacy Lane. There is an adjoining light industrial/commercial-truck yard directly east of the subject property, and the Los Angeles River and 710 Freeway further east. Directly south of the subject property, there is a Southern California Edison (SCE) utility easement with overhead power lines in place, and single-family residential uses are located south of the SCE easement, within the TBSP. Immediately west of the Project site are Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue. North of Legacy Lane and west of Adella Avenue are undeveloped lots within the Legacy High School Complex. South of Legacy Lane and west of Adella Avenue are singlefamily residential uses.
Proposed Vesting TTM and Associated Development: The applicant is requesting approval of a Vesting TTM (Attachment B) to allow the subdivision of one parcel (2.02 acres) into 54 condominium units in connection with a proposed residential development located at 10130 Adella Avenue.
The proposed development involves the construction of 54 new residential condominium units (for sale), comprising three-story attached townhomes in six buildings. Each building would contain nine dwelling units and have a maximum height of approximately 3 7 feet. The units would consist of a mix of floor plans 296
Planning Commission
(TTM No. 84531)-10130 Adella Ave.
March 18, 2025
with three-to four-bedroom options, ranging in size from 1,304 to 1,705 square feet. Six (12 percent) of the units would be provided at the moderate-income level.
Administrative Plan Review & Design Review: The proposed (54-unit townhome) development project associated with the requested Vesting TTM is deemed a "Multifamily Residential" use in accordance with the provisions of the Zoning Code. "Multifamily Residential" uses are permitted by-right with the approval of an Administrative Plan Review. In addition, Design Review is required for the proposed development since it involves a parcel measuring greater than 15,000 square feet. Administrative Plan Review and Design Review are discretionary procedures conducted by staff. Therefore, the overall design of the proposed development is not subject to review by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may only take action on the TTM as it relates to tlie proposed subdivision of a parcel for condominium purposes to accommodate the proposed development.
ANALYSIS:
Municipal Code Requirements for Vesting TTM Approval: Pursuant to South Gate Municipal Code (SGMC) Section 12.10.060, the TTM shall be heard by the Plai'u'iing Commission at a scheduled hearing; and action shall be taken to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove such TTM. Subsequently, a Final Map shall be prepared and forwarded to the City Council for final review, in which they shall approve, deny, or modify the Planning Commission's action.
ENVIRONMENT AL ANALYSIS:
An environmental (air quality, noise, and traffic impact) analysis (Attachment C) was conducted for the proposed development, and based on the studies, it has been determined the proposed project would qualify for a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32 - Infill Development Projects) and would not have a significant environmental impact.
COMMENTS FROM OTHER DEP ARTMENTS:
Staff routed the project for comments to several City Departments, including the Public Works Department.
If the project is approved, the comments received from the Public Works Department would be incorporated as conditions of approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the evidence presented, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the project is Categorically Exempt from the CEQA under Section 15332, (Class 32) "Infill Development Projects", make the required findings and requirements set forth in the South Gate Municipal Code, and adopt a Resolution to apprOVe Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531 associated with the 54-unit townhome development at 10130 Adella Avenue, subject to the recommended conditions of approval stipulated in the proposed Resolution and/or other conditions that the Planning Commission may wish to impose.
ATT ACHMENTS:
A. Resolution No. 2025-03
B. Proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map
C. CEQA Exemption Report
l"lg 297
ATT ACHMENT A
RESOLUTION N0. 2025-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VESTING TENT ATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 84531 TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF ONE PARCEL INTO A 54-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 10130 ADELLA AVENUE, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENT AL QUALITY ACT.
WHEREAS, Nick Patterson, on behalf of City Ventures (the "Applicant"), filed a complete application requesting approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to allow the subdivision of one parcel into 54 condominium units in connection with a proposed residential development located at 10130 Adella Avenue (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Project site comprises approximately 2.02 acres, identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 6221-026-020, and is located within the Industrial Flex (IF) zone of the Tweedy Boulevard Specific Plan (TBSP) area; and
WHEREAS, the Project involves new construction of 54 residential condominium units (for sale), comprising three-story attached townhomes in six buildings, and six (12 percent) of the units will be provided to moderate-income buyers; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Soutli Gate Municipal Code (SGMC) Section 12.10.060, the Vesting TTM shall be heard by the Planning Commission at a scheduled hearing; and action shall be taken to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove such TTM; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing of March 18, 2025, was published in compliance with State law in a local newspaper of general circulation. In addition, a public notice was mailed 10 days in advance of the hearing to each property owner, occupants and resident within a 1,000- foot radius of the project site, indicating the date and time of the public hearing in accordance with California Government Code 65091; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2025 the Plai'ining Commission held a public hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the Vesting TTM, including without limitation, information provided to the Planning Commission by City staff and public testimony; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined the Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under Section 15332 (Class 32 - Infill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, this Resolution and its findings are made based upon evidence presented to the Commission at its public hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the Community Development Department; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. All of the facts set forth in the recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
2'lol 298
SECTION 2. Based on substantial evidence, both written and oral, from the public hearing, the Planning Commission finds that the approval of the Vesting TTM is consistent with the General Plan and zoning regulations, promotes the orderly development of the area, and supports housing opportunities in accordance with City policies and State laws.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines") and finds the project to be exempt under a Class 32 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 - Infill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations); and
SECTION 4. The Planning Commission hereby approves the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531 to allow tl'ie subdivision of one parcel into 54 residential condominium units for a development located at 10130 Adella Avenue, subject to the execution and fulfillment of Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit "A" attached to this Resolution.
SECTION 5. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall maintain a copy in the official records of the City.
This recommendation was adopted by the following vote at tlie Planning Commission meeting of March 18, 2025.
AYES:
NOES:
Approved and ADOPTED this 18' of March 2025.
John F. Signo, AICP
Planning Manager
APPROVED:
Jimmy Ozaeta
Chairperson
City Plaru'iing Commission
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
l"% 299
Exhibit "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Tentative Tract Map No. 84531)
Violation of, or noncompliance with, any of these conditions shall constitute grounds for revocation of this permit:
Planning Division
1. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of South Gate, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of South Gate or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or atuul, an approval of the City of South Gate, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or administrative officers concerning the subject Application.
The City of South Gate will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of South Gate and the Applicant will either undertake the defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal or other consultant costs or will advance funds to pay for the defense of the matter by the City Attorney. If the City of South Gate fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible for defending, indemnify or hold haimless the City of South Gate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the Applicant's consent, but should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein.
2. Except as set forth in subsequent conditions, all-inclusive, and subject to department corrections and conditions, the property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the Application, environmental assessment, and plans submitted.
3. The proposed project shall comply with all Federal, State, County, and Local laws and ordinances that may apply to this permit, stated herein or not.
4. The approval for this Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall expire two years following the date of approval by the Planning Commission, consistent with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, as it exists or may be subsequently amended in Title 7, Division 2 of the Government Code, state of California, commencing with Section 66410.
5. The Community Development Director is authorized to make minor modifications to the approved preliminary plans or any of the conditions if such modifications achieve substantially the same results, as with strict compliance with said plans and conditions.
6. This Vesting Tentative Tract Map approval shall be contingent upon obtaining approval of Administrative Plan Review and Design Review for the proposed Project.
7. The Applicant and property owner shall agree in writing to the above conditions.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
l'f)%300
Public Works Department
General Conditions
8. Prepare street, drainage, water, sewer, grading, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, signing and striping improvement plans showing all existing and proposed public works improvements and dry utilities as oritlined below. Said plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on City approved title blocks.
9. Provide an engineer's estimate for all public works improvements and pay all plan-check fees in accordance with the latest fee schedule prior to plan review.
10. Developer shall deposit $5,000 with the City to cover tlie City's cost for review of pre-development submittals such as preliminary plans, including traffic, civil, planning and environi'nental consultants, etc.
11. The developer shall pay Road Mitigation fees in accordance with the latest fee schedule. Residential Development fee is calculated at $2,492 per dwelling unit, unless otherwise exempt from the Road Mitigation Ordinance or waived by the City Council.
12. The developer shall pay LID Plan Check fees. Review is done by City's Environmental Consultant, John Hunter & Associates.
13. Pay permit, construction management and inspection fees associated with this project in accordance with the latest Public Improvement Plan Check fee schedule at the time of permit issuance and inspectxon.
14. Coordinate all Public Works improvements inspection with the Public Works Department at least 48 hours prior to commencing work. Contact Jose Loera at (323) 563-9578 to arrange for a Public Works Inspection.
15. Developer's contractor, subcontractors, and consultants working on this project must obtain and pay City Business License and permits fees.
16. Prior to the City's acceptance of the public improvements, developer shall submit a refundable deposit in the amount of $3,000, which will be refunded upon receipt of "Record Drawings" for all the required improvements on approved Mylar(s) and AutoCAD files on a CD.
17. Comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA compliance) in regards to access ramps, sidewalks, driveway and any public access pathways.
18. Comply with the City's Community Development Ordinance pertaining to construction debris recycling. Contact the Building & Safety Department to obtain a Construction & Demolition Debris Waste Reduction Recycling Plan forms.
19. Developer to contact the City's Waste Hauling Company (Universal Waste System) at (562) 334-3660 and obtain approval for the location of waste disposal container(s), including facilities for recycling.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
l'o@l,
301
20. The developer must comply with all applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) regulations.
21. Developer to coordinate with Southern Califoriiia Edison Company for any improvements within their right-of-way.
Streets
22. Remove and reconstruct any and all damaged/or deficient existing improvements including but not limited to driveways, access ramps, curb and gutter, sidewalk within the parkway along the perimeter of the proposed development. Existing sidewalks witli non-compliant ADA cross slopes exceeding 2% shall be replaced.
23. Construct new driveways at least 3 feet (for residential streets) away from any above-ground obstructions in the public rigl'it-of-way to the top of the driveway. Otlierwise, the obstruction shall be relocated at the developer's expense. Ensure that each driveway provides proper pedestrian access across, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The final layout and site driveway design shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
24. Proposed neW driveways will meet the classification of commercial driveways (Minimum width required is 26 feet).
25. Slurry seal existing asphalt from the edge of the property line to the center of the street along tlie propeity frontage on Lagacy Lane and Adella Avenue. Restore signing and striping as needed. Limits of work to be identified on the civil improvement plans and approved by the City.
26. Developer shall execute a landscape maintenance agreement for the off- site landscape and irrigation system.
27. Construct new tree wells and plant new 48-inch boxed street trees on Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue.
Install and weld decorative cast iron tree well covers. The species of any new street trees shall be in accordance with the Citywide Tree Master Plan. All tree wells shall be irrigated with dedicated irrigation line.
28. Proposed landscape shall be designed to incorporate water conservation techniques through application of xeriscape landscaping principles. Landscape plan to include low-water demanding plants with limited turf, efficient irrigation system and use of California native plants.
29. Limits of work to be identified on the civil improvement plans and approved by the City Engineer.
30. Any damages done to existing public improvements during construction shall be removed and replaced to original condition per the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
31. Any cross flow drainage from the property over the sidewalks is not permitted. Construct parkway drains as required.
32. Where utility cuts on concrete pavement are proposed, the entire concrete panel shall be removed and reconstructed from scoreline to scoreline.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
302
33. Centerline ties, property corners and benchrnark monument shall be preserved in the public right of way. In the event that ties, property corners and benchmark monuments are distiirbed or removed, a licensed surveyor shall re-establish and file required corner record survey with the Los Angeles County Surveyors office. All recorded copies of the documents shall be submitted to the City along with tlie final set of as-built plans.
34. In order to meet the City's Lighting Master Plan, developer shall verify that the frontage of the proposed development meets the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) minimum standards for streetliglit illumination for Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue. If deemed insufficient, developer shall design and construct the necessary lighting improvements. Provide a photometric analysis for Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue. Install new streetlights if lighting distribution is inadequate.
35. Paint propeity address on the curb, in front of the proposed development, to the City and Fire Departments satisfaction.
36. Close existing driveway(s) on Adella Avenue and Legacy Lane, which will no longer be in use as part of the new development and replace with new curb and gutter and full-width sidewalk to match existing.
Right-Of-Way Easements and Tract map
37. Developer shall prepare and process documents for a Tract Map. The Tract Map shall be effective when the certificate of compliance and deed(s) has/have been recorded. No peri'nit will be issued prior to recordation.
38. Additional dedication may be required at the proposed driveways to meet and comply with ADA requirements. Proposed driveways should provide pedestrian access across it with cross slope not exceeding 2% and maintain minimum width of 4-foot.
39. Developer shall submit the required document for the roadway dedication or any proposed easements.
Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, the City of South Gate Municipal Code and all the applicable state and local laws.
Grading and Drainage
40. Comply with all Federal, State, and local agency requirements pertaining to the Clean Water Act, which establishes regulations, set forth in the Countywide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit.
41. Comply witli the City's Storm Water Management Ordinance. Implement all NPDES requirements and Best Management Practices during and after construction. Provide and obtain approval of a sitespecific Erosion Control Plan.
42. Submit a Grading and Drainage plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and Building Division. Show all existing and proposed driveways, curb & gutter, sidewalks, curb ramps, street trees, tree wells, street lights, street signs, power poles, fire hydrants, utility boxes, meters, curb drains, etc. on the plans. Provide LID Plan and calculations required to address storm water discharge and NPDES requirements by City's Environmental Consultant, John Hunter and Associates (See attached requirements).
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
303
43. Submit Geotechnical reports, including but not limited to infiltration, percolation reports.
44. All on-site parking and circulation areas shall be paved as required by a pavement engineering or geotechnical repoit prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, subject to the review and approval of the Public Works and Community Development Departments.
45. Provide a final detailed drainage study (prepared by a registered/licensed civil engineer) for review and approval. Tlie study shall include existing and proposed hydrologic conditions as well as hydraulic calculations (per Los Angeles County format) for all drainage control devices and storm drain lines.
46. Grading plan will include geotechnical and geologist certification, stating that grading plan has been reviewed and found to be in conformance with the recommendations as outlined in the soils and geological report.
47. Historical or existing stoim water flow from adjacent lots must be received and directed by gravity to the street, a public drainage facility, or an approved drainage easement.
48. Iust control operations shall be perfoimed by the developer at the time, location and in the amount required and as o'[ten as necessary to prevent the excavation or fill work, demolition operation, or other activities from producing dust in amounts harmful to people or causing a nuisance to persons living nearby or occupying buildings in the vicinity of the work. The developer is responsible for compliance witl'i Fugitive Dust Regulations issued by the Air Quality Management District (AQMD).
Sewer
49. The developer shall prepare a comprehensive Sewer Capacity Study signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer addressing the sewer needs of the new proposed site and pay all required review fees.
Initial deposit of $761 is required to initiate the plan check. Actual costs of the review will be billed to the developer as the plan check progresses. Based on the Sewer Capacity Study, the developer might be required to pay for any necessary sewer upgrades. The limits of the upgrades shall be to the downstream point of connection to where sufficient capacity exists. If in case the sewer connection is made to Los Angeles County sewer system, the developer may need to coordinate and get approval from Los Angeles County Sanitation District and pay any associated County fees.
50. Install adequate sewer lateral(s) to serve the proposed development, and abandon any existing sewer laterals at the main line and sewer cleanouts that will not be used, to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Building & Safety Departments. Sewer laterals will be abandoned in place with either cement slurry backfill or concrete bulkhead plug per City Standard Plans.
51. The developer shall consult the City Engineer to detemiine the sewer location and design requirements.
Relocation of any public sewer lines shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. Pavement moratorium applies.
Water
52. Conduct a Water System Capacity Study and provide a copy of the report to the City for review and approval. If higher water needs are determined, then the developer will pay for any water upgrade needed to meet the demand. Developer to pay for all costs incurred for the review of the capacity study.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
2B'5
304
53. The developer shall submit water calculation for the City to run the calculations in the City's water module. The developer shall pay tlie water module capacity study at cost.
54. All proposed improvements shall be served by adequately sized to accommodate the total domestic, landscape and fire flows. Plans shall include size, type and location of the proposed fire hydrants approved by the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD). Provide fire flow calculations to justi'fy the size and the velocity in the pipe (not to exceed 10 ft/sec)
55. Coordinate with the City's Water Division regarding removal of all existing water meters that will not be used by the development.
56. Existing water meter needs to be relocated or abandoned. Water meters are not allowed along driveways.
57. Abandon existing water meters shall be capped at the main line.
58. Developer shall pay Water Developinent Impact Fees per the latest City Fee Schedule. Fee is dependent on water meter sizes. Development Water Impact fees are paid at the time of obtaining the building permit.
59. Relocation of any public water lines shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer.
60. The developer shall prepare a traffic study, signed and stamped by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer, evaluating public health and safety issues, as well as traffic circulation and operations for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic witl'iin a 300-foot radius of the development. The analysis shall address student and pedestrian safety, traffic flow, emergency and non-emergency access, line of sight and internal circulation to assure for appropriate design for trash removal, on-site maneuvering, etc. witliin the site design as presented. As part of the project, the applicant is required to replace the existing "K-rail" barrier near the intersection of Adella and Legacy Lane with an automated arm gate, or like device (Automated Unit) to allow emergency vehicle access and non-restricted access at designated times, as deternnined by the City. The Automated Unit's design and installation shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works and will be maintained and operated by the City.
Additionally, the analysis shall determine whether additional safety measures are needed to enhance student and pedestrian safety, such as signage, crosswalks, and traffic striping. New traffic signals, traffic signal modifications and/or traffic signal synchronization improvements are not a requirement of this project.
61. Internal circulation, particularly where there are trash pick-ups should be shown accommodating the vehicles that will serve the development.
62. Clear unobstructed sight distance lines shall meet AASHTO guidelines and shall be shown on the improvement plans at intersections and/or driveways.
63. Upon completion of construction, developer shall remove temporary construction markings (USA marking).
64. All public and private signage and markings for vehicular traffic shall conform to the provisions of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD).
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
305
Utilities
65. Developer is responsible for research on private utility lines (Gas, Edison, Telephone, Cable, Irrigation, etc.) to ensure there are no conflicts with the site.
66. All existing on-site utility lines and existing utility lines serving the proposed development, that conflict with the project, shall be relocated, removed, or abandoned at the developer's expense to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pavement moratorium shall apply.
67. For all electrical needs the developer will coordinate with SCE Planner.
68. Any significant proposed utility underground vaults or meter shall be located away from the proposed driveways.
69. Remove any abandoned above ground utilities witl'iin the Parkway area including but i'iot limited service pedestals, pull boxes, etc.
70. All proposed on-site sewer, water, and drainage facilities shall be private system(s) maintained by the property owner.
71. All new utilities serving the property (Power, telephone, and cable television services, etc.) shall be underground. Pavement moratorium shall apply.
Use and Occupancy
72. Complete Public Works improvements prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. Developer may consult the Department of Public Works to request approval to implement and/or construct public improvements required in the conditions of approval after the certificate of occupancy is issued. The Department of Public Works may approve and/or deny approval of the request, partially or in its entirety, at the full discretion of the ASSistant City Manager/Director of Public Works. Any public improvements not completed prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy shall require the developer to enter into a development agreement and post the necessary securities in the amount approved by the Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works and in a form approved by the City Attorney. All public improvements shall be completed at the developer's cost.
73. The City reserves the right to add additional conditions as deemed necessary to comply with health and safety requirements.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
23"7 306
ATTAC,MENTB VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 84531
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA """""'w"'+7 LEGALDESCRIPTION: I 5 =-.....,,.,,.,,-..,,,,,,.,.-.,,.-=, ,_l nictntnu nt wn tonm. niixn ai rnaowi I.u'
'iffi==MR:X- ,'x/ffi.=,.=5-.,7.:= ,o, f
I
'.':=i='.;:<:.i.=..'=:=;.; ;.o,=.ii;;.a;;i;:. -==,=-======- "=----',,i = =,;: (ontn!IIOOW n(in TOnotmnUwuNtWIRUNl *wuNl atniIH( S I tnunnHtat}010(& wtiuin !!), ,,,, ,N,!, ,,M )lil NllHamRmK intv 110 I ',ffi:n""x','Noo"t""Fn':ni;'io'm"tA"'n"t%c"Wa,Nn"''m("'i,"r"'n' iA"%",:i"nW::"H%7W:"H'; (' i" ;;gig;[c,;! "n'i'it'u%ii'ti' """' -------,J "=""'Ai'-=- =-= :lN:ff:=.nNl!:m"lsN7:Ot,y,)t-,I':D;-,:r(.st5c:..g.'0'NIN:In:,ny,,,,["l0=,itn"i" r%'tH:SS'o:o:::W':5::in" < i I I , "a' 1 'o"""""""" tonttttntcnncta . . roniin tttn })Xt & wzhtn ' I I i noux rocatiohiusztct to c+mtt I I li lOatT!l) V TfmNaR(toRD I i 2i 00 - --11 tall!110! 'mt"l"po' :llONorLOT! OIIJ 00 ;ii0 INih( m nTiouiNatiL """ " " """' LJ ' I i "" 'o""'o"" 77B I !H!tlI tDlllTIFRltlUj - inONlVllou OnunMi 2 I icunnotroiit.ptitcttcxhaitnntcnxoiin Oi' j Nit+l}munlNllll51i _,_,,____,iuti ni:i7a\;a:M":"=""=C==Nr"""="'}',:/ i"f' rS -=-'o ff :::,:..?'4:=:4:€ i-"' -=-=->-=-==='="===-"='
E'G'J'-""" F------rffl,;:;-,-_-:-,,-.,-==,==.,5.=.T,,=_.-_=:iJJ:::l::3'EE::f:,=:"== 35'5,::::'5;5;::::",::'.":","""' ____il ) rii,-iii:,-';ipi,-'iiiiiiHiffi::'=i:i,-i..=,-'fi,':i::l:l,"o=",- =..:::;;.';;;;;i;;;:,;;;:.::.".:.::::',.= NRm:Xi:,ii:i:#=:.. -'a %,,,,,,.,,,, _____, ,_,_ ===':':'J=-="=5'J="4 =..5.,......,,.-..,.,,....,...,.g..,..,.
mlt "" """"' ItMl))01!!l)litt)l """" ""' , B WS/El2s7g7 -"a"" " R0AD - - - __ _______ ixKMu!(N thtioruunii tl. OI 10ttihi Aluiiuinc llj!lRUu(HI ttniuiiiinii NO 00-l!i)!)! orini(IIYnT OmllIiouiu N!tt)FDI aiii BENCHMARKSTATEMENT: ,____,___,_ ____ ___, ,,,,,,-,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,--,--,,,,,,,,--,,,,,,,,--,,, rot antna tonim ntniumw no piiniii SURVEYOR'S BOUNDARY NOTE': 'a ;:u ?i.:nSr'::; ;HHa';; a;intc OTainu aaaaaa'0I%0 =-"=-' Idiom HWY& }lLttm( !lvn (tlBl! {-l) I i,72V.;::,F:==4=3=A.:=,\;iF:;:i.i;i.i,:?32a=.:JiTh;r=A=A:r;il=5ff;84-:4:f4:=;.U:?:Q=== ,;=:;;;':';,;=,,..,.,,,,,..,..,,,..,,=- Ttt} +uli ttRR(l fltP NuNO(N its! A; fffl l!
FLOOD NOTE: ttmt stanza xtti *rt io rntait IN! nttonn noinutm wnn:h tntann +t uni ai iniinnutu+ no ttntirnrinn on un nntnvtu+ nottN ='-'o'-"'-=-n-n NIIK nu( =-------=-----------=-----------=-==------==-----=-------=-=---------=-=-=-=---------- UTILITYPURVEYORS&SERVICES: }O uvff' }tN Ittu NO OtO))titlnI. { DDnD,-l<rn rAerljrklT(: IH( 110(('I (A!ill(01 }tt! tel inn(IN!J WNI(u l! {NOWn010!ON , ND usE su, MARY: Q9tuH: :;tH::t5:t,, ::::,::::n Nnul:[(:,,: ;o:u::,W: :5, 'gn":%' SWH:A%+'S':%:I"=WJ'% ;N!74nl+i OuaWINm tonriawuht !RnNit!uttlnN NilNt, inll M;% 0:'w, m::';":"n,t-;m,i,o,m-n .,- ;5;,F)IF)!;; % 0€} aaa="= "--Ill""-=l-" "'- "" ""-'-" -""-"'-"-""- -'- """"-"' """ -"""'-'-" -"" ""'-"- -' """-""' #- It!t+llNN imi!iO-l))l 1, ,. _ ,, la!l la!Al IiI i0: NOTE, iHk':ni'O!i:; :ii I l) tnttiuant to iuOnMllU iuv aci t(iO0 ttl!} i(!). W:r';': ')'t;"t":l%'uuoNW"!f:0":S:":"t"::"1%;:HD:oS:?:;I'W:50:S"[%?;":[;H'lff:"[;:"ion:?:::':XI;":;::i'i:tn%:;r'll """"a ""a 'a " ""' "-" iolic lyly(@ 4y(I IH( HH41 y uu+Npv nNIL 111YO( fllfn ON IHII ttmtt iup (nllBll!NtO O{ OF}l +llllN! Nt(O!n litinulll!Ion 10 101 D!!!RT!N !Nltlall totliloll nT lu#llOT(UINI} WNI(H Rt!ulj! IN iNt Rt(000 allj (F m!110 IT(ON( INN Nltll !nil) All(KIN( Wml IH( lllltl6((1100 (F I pulltu fAllRl TONlln(X { uitluott nlv ti iNtt ((Nl(IIN( 101(0}(tllnN 0 )4 4) H@ SURVFYOR'S STATFMFNT: -=-i-irrhe evtvrur-iv.
CITY OF S(IJTH CIATE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIN(. AND DEVELOPMENT CVEN-180
4my
'="?="A-'En a'-'-:""-'\"' (3ff%=
aTYVENllRES
i:Thcityventurei (040) -'="}50-)5tc
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 84531
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
10130 ADELLA AVENUE
1 [
t
,,,, , M(non,, ,, ,,,, 6 ThAll l ONITII(R. N(( 0010)
307
i 'J
iJ
It ' .U,!lfi: '
8;:, :-!
EXISTINC,EASEMENTS PROPOSEDEASEMENTS
LEGEND:
PROJECT AREA
Q
CITY OF SOUTH GATE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIN(. AND DEVELOPMENT
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 84531
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
10130 ADELLA AVENIIE
SOUTH GATE. CALIFORNIA 90280
308
----_-__-=:-=I'--- ===J==-f-.-,_"_____=...:..,
' ! fT'T->:,- ,.,. --<--ff:-_ - _ __I_-_-- - -" 7-- - - -. -------- =-_- i/.! io=>_L-gy=.yz'__rz.='l'-_ffi-_ffi.-_-J-_-..r-z-=-_-..,'_o-Jl'-.-,.=---=':-r-y*._"NE-_'==='----"'----"---=.=----"- EEES':=== I 'v=:.= .' - - = . .,..
i 'v-i- # a - - i - a -a - - - a aa - - "' a "" a 'a-' .aa - - - -" l_ :r I , ' a --
i ' i i '
- - , s ( - ;ii., , = - 4-l 00 0#0
n#- 01101'OWIAI!0111
_1'.1.1"=4='. -==,-=!, = *" l
i ' - !j i
1 ,f
r T! nn.t '%\-/;=. -!_":nff:'j
'
/--'.-_-r_.-_.-=;=-. rr l_'-rr':.*!
-:K !f@ tt ltmk
l! " l -!!J - 0 :, ' !: IOG in - ( -
ai # *-I! a. *- 0 rl
i'li':
. i I , lj
i 'l : ' LJ ' o'a'
i=l'i ,
i, IQJi :J ' I
I i i I
il o '
, ' . l I
= (
I o j ': s,
I
: . : l :o
i , -44-i
. , l-,. ) . j il i .h
i/i " ,,
<Jlll,_____,.1..:. J.ll:1. .Ill
Ili II
-4. s I
:S. S, ,
' -'=;l- ' HHI
_.
"-'-""ZJ _" l
',+_'.u'--
a ' " Fh99:29 l
' PAD"98.62
J ,I- nnt;}l I
" -l,, !EGieui, il
. :'3.lJBEllDG7r'. -
z fJ_j _ ';r.
,- ' :l- ::4--i=-
vi
!,
:.,....--.-..-. !j Wn,
! I
LAu,.@-)e-";aa
, ,'====.-. , Jl,-
,:_,H',:..,, ;.,:3--.":.l.,_,'-z, ,,D,i7,if.
i':.'a'-"':':,l;aau'At-";aa+A" ,,,jffi. la-l'l%. r);(F. .a'a' aanr"i%l%aa{ aataa- 1. ;-,,1,-,,',:., _,i_,-:=.;
PAD=99.56 -,, Tl-- - PAD=99.95
-, ' --p-i7_ i_a<r s--- ar 7_rir" 'r ._ al
I i- - - '
f o;'tl_,_aa-';/tf ',_',-ADAr
lE='rPn
;.-l,,,,
Iro i E7F';'y
I,-=i !-"i E;
io t':-'l l?
,-xta,, :,,. __lt '
i - - - -+ ' iw -
l":--'-aTft '-&
F,9-
'l ,____. ii :l.,'
Si' i - - t -- (! !11
;-' - -_ii .l" - : _ !; n;
t
ffl
l ffl ttltH MIN
tXm W WtK
a(t :; t>N!!Xj:, WjT"
i' " """"'
G"" :" H":j'mm W
! nu wnum wim
i t I'lAVII
' N/W mtui ni iiti
.1
m,'i
-l
1.Tie: )t
l) l)
!i
=i.,,l
-'t.l
[1'- ,,""%'Ar., J.=$i'"' l ',,,'TJ""_'-"$-it'i:o
Ir" ,_xir:,. 1'5:%7"--4 '.J-[_5'G'a ,5":" rl"-'!1=D:Ga41' r,'a,lo,!,g-;:-=-T,,,_r__,_ €':_:,fe7-%4-,,,a-F-a*;r,':':!, ,_-,,'iyB -.k"y!<'\k- =,f- :-:.='-,,,..J$_,= ,_f_. TJfA!] aa ' i ItQ ig
,J_ ,
1 _'y'3;:.'- ' - a - a ri 3
j"-' [- '; %' %'i'ii ' - FF=10lj6 ;"mpaolDD5B4 At..,
"'7':-.""""""'Q:""_B,.___.""'r""'a,_':..(o""'oo"
Q-r .,J
l'." -= i ffi,i;
S ;
.%llJ _,,ffi_ _
'j'*!" ""' ' '.f_'l- '! !l)!'_'
1 a ;' i ,;
I 0-l l., -l ,.. ,
11 l)
"ia atba; I ""
_ "" ' -+- l"a'' "'a i i t 1l! i . 'i --
- ..- _- I ' '- _i i
a _ix, _ .% .-1., 1 i u i ni<i
O )l- -" € lI - ' a ' I
); ,
l' . ' . t
'
.l_ . . .1
r.lll:.%.-j --,-'?'- 'r---,-':--+r, ""J"aF,J-- s-,
'al'il, ,
ffl. I-a- l ai& IT - - aa*i '- - - -=" a "' - - - - - - '- " '" '1 ' iti;- ;;i i; iii-' - - I l ii *iw-iiii -+"f'-+-)r-, d-li-'------.'-==----'-'-"-=-=-'-----'-a"'-.-.---7-'_.J=rhlU_j----j_:-E_---i_I_I r i.',, I I l- _" 1 _1' I ._ _ _ _'. _- " - m -"- - - "a- I (/ "/ / / // // // /A V/ " aa"""/A r'. I M tn "-"- "'-' -IT f - 7s.-' T '-laa-Y//////l---- - Tl i- - . . [////4' j-'.}T/""?l i " a" ' I'/ ""A a V " ' A ' i I/ A V. 'A ;l -.ti i Q ;tintm m
?
CITY OF SOUTH (;ATE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIN(; AND DEVELOPMENT CVEN-180
A
Qff:
aTY VDlnlRES
l-:%C't+yVenture,K)ialluIjNG. llf. l)l Ml(Ha{ON ORIV[. NITt M (010) xia-)itn
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO E1453!
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
1aT30 ADELLA AVENUE
SOUTH GATE. CALIFORNIA 90280
3 5
309
f_-' g I /
f',-J_______________-=,J""- I , , _,",, l,_" _;- - - _ J ---__. ,, - - ..___ _ _ -__-_ _-- _ :_ _ _-. _ _ _._....._ " ' a- 10-a - l- __ -- . .
i l " '. - ' - - - - _-' - .__i ---- amtxvi
r ,,i""-T--------:i;,.- ______.... --=---.________ -. "-":-"-"-- - - - - - - -.-----_-r:.:-:- r:'-'=[-;"-'("-';"'="1V-ffleo?"-='-"'-=-= ==f'-7="'&=-=""7-r.-...=.yeffi"'NE-'.==-----b-=,,=-=--..,=----"---" I =,", -:,-;:J--'i'-l- -'-- - -"- '-T' r-( _,,:. ___tg) r-" -..,,- ,.,.,.. ,,,t,i
I ill ; I
,':;,;r4,..,.,
-t-=ii ' I -I" I (in n) l
,=!=i-=)'l'
.:' ...- --:ii,'l--l a . - ... ..,.,..-:El'$ 4 u /{,..,,. ,.:. -i-'.,._-,,, 'Q4 7,"' ";, - . m.x':.'\ ".' - tnorz - - S -,, y ,l
'..7 -w_ I;g __-_' ,:=i = r , -;"' - l
."'+'_ha
-, . -l :? , l
a, ., , ___,, . :E[ ,,
L:,,,1 -; I
C,:,;:-;-"-,'=-
(::-T-'-,
- lq, :,_jf___
t- ,; -
' 0 , _l.Z_
;a'o"il
!l' rl
Ill
Ill
lli
ili
TT!L
jl
1. l i v.(
j ,,
'l
{1,
ffl
<'-T-r...= I-'Ll,-%-B4-:. ;+-=-'-=--q:l'
m
.J
ill
Ill
1.1 I
1. 11
jii
l":"a'4'a""'-_:4",'!:,)a.-:""l_...lrnnpnt;-.
i'i" '_: _, ." - iQ_II
i -i- " ' r o --- r-l
I " .-Ill" " I I
iBL-[)G," ":"' i-"a'lDG73l , Jul . _ , , -A_ _,. i i
I :r_ . - --" -rri ' r---. ' -.=-' hl
ial&p --- l I " :_ ,. l -:_ I I
li
II
11 II
'I
lai
i:, , ' i I' _- lla
c. e,_- s*' ::; ':'- !:: .- bo
,,,_g _ . _. - ,.,,4,, : _ , a!_ ,, .jl ifl'i- :-__ 'O"%: -.-'-St '=-:
-. " - ' C> t' -
[i==='-n
li
II
II 4- }'I:'-:":t:
5,-%J
i a"a_._____=' jl
. .,"'7'k'aao' i. ' l!lW 1:-,, - b*ih I X
i o .,ii_i, }
'_4 .a ' 4 _-
=_B-p-="- . p__===t,,-,-,,,,,,=,-----:==i
I I' - 1:-"""",ff-'-"!-1 _ u_x--_- _ _ _ ,_,_,,-__,*,!"'!'_"' W- - """'-*ff -"7' "" - - fi q- -'=-iid_ z zg ttuttnian -j<j - ia'=a' T "l'aoW'aTi"- ' - V///"II" h"/""]" slla Y/ aa"/! V A . i v ii ra'/l xi -.ti' u writnnip
EXISTING EASEMENTS
0 mmti r+n nu
, : ::%W:W:::T M1W5INlNtIll)tONIlll fltWtO
(5,;. '.:': ,;;H4 T, 4ff,a,;: iH4?%:1T : 111!(H
, :i%% :4Ri: :::TT: W ;:4M::, 111101 II
, :t5ffiNI:liI: :;uaH:l: !:M;L?0;Wk:N!l,. ::m
l? &
uttnuO tWmlp lull 6 IWul#l W OI tlffm Kl(Off 00 }lOfflla! ? (!!);;; fff i;E'i;i'6;;ii*;' " ""- '-
@;tl%il ma f(llMm01)ilJ!Gl&IIUA!IllfmuNDll NOIltl ff Omllll ,5 :P:(S %4':"in'H"':".'%: y ::41,:mllUiT
,, %ini:47 t;::7::t::!? ;;O :, T:%:Tffl, IltfiJl} It
CITY OF SOUTH GATE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNINC AND DEVELOPMENT CVEN-180
=-"
VESTINC: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 84531
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
lCn30 ADELLA AVENUE
SOIITH GATE, CALIFORNIA 90280
4 5
)
310
Th
i-'-;,- =-J"- _._ __ - --- -o '=":='-=='Eh
X .! +_:__, I "--- '- ""- Z'oa ' a"- - o "- --- - -- - -- - - -- u-f__-- - 711_'JZ-:-ff_l _-_jl-_ ru € 'W'aTawtnnnun yi'(a :'-t->.----,_ '-'-'-_-t- -- - -- -- - - - - --- - -,,..l'_"::':" (:/: '-=-_":"I.U]-=4:K-EA""..-- '_...'-J.:--_---___._--l."=Z_-'"7J"-Fo=s-.7'.-..:<."-"'---""- L!?'.""' ' I t'.lli I:,J: L:\',':'f:',-j '-- - =------."'fI ":
Vr , ,{ l
01/ J'--- f,';"--- =-T':
l- " l
i/%
11}
K ,
" e-a i ' " aaa '-''
(.z .+-J fllII>MNlm}Th0f DNtaN! t!t1100!
' I ' ,' ,':
-: : I :ThQ
l' : i I iU .
I ' W -a el' . I , I 2 # I Ill I
I
,i ;' j l" i
i,'ffl7'l,, ;
! i
: lll.i,
2'i'f7
j j _ 4/'.X _j 4 7X.., _- - i .%'-3J !' X - , ' - - - ;.' __w'_) 4 8'-':_"=,- =-,_ -- - ""';""-'-'-a T"'---'''
,, _.a- l ..-rl -': A-- &- -'-- - '" '
li_lil,""'.%a;,1-1 ==l
I - 'l II' % ' 11 i- -., I XI" a '
.1" ";'F .Fil a 'l,'-_-31
": :!__. i.il
,.,..l_,_s.L:,_4,
1 € ,l_:.._=,r-. N
l- ja' II- .-i-: I
"'-" '- lil i_, 4_,-,,a
'J:".':i+:--'1,
i
L _i_ I'T
ili
*
1. I
i i
i .1..I
li
i i i
al'.
i----"TIJ_-';-e----
-:-+-=;-=,r,;
7F,H'E " ":--" ': a. =(.L: .1 -) ',il" -'i - +--a = "I ,"TJa- a-1---;t',l,. > . _'.-bb 7_;_ u ai__)i________--'_._._v ' :! -. I " - " - F!:!-
!
j
'l
,l
'i
!__ r L
ill
Ill
I.i
ffl
,:j
'l I
- 4'- - - --l- - - - - - -t- -'- "-
'i_"___,p_4 _'.-=,___
,,..,_,-'Ixiit-0iti,:i, ,,. .
J
f'l
4 li
al.
)
f
I
!
?7,_,_1-;J,":.+' o"__. -__,5pF)T :=:_- ,, _-_,_='-l %\-,"=,.,-;=:=%-,=H( 1 n
II
I.i
li
II
-1. _c ( : a' o ", a -ic .1'
I " - i ' .' - ' _.l I
--= ., ,- I -. - . - I
:l-------2A- ': i . - - :. I I
t ,t- -IJ- _ _ . irAffl = .. _ 4 -.- l I ;-=-iz- rii i'i ,_l
I
<!,-i"i
Ili II i !II Ijl
-i=, ==l-a,,-il
.;ii :--. a'-"- .l'a
"j:,'7"" -ale,,':'II
ji:I:+._7,"R_J,_-](
)7 =. '- 'rv
!: ' 17 ,h D _L'4,
II F -"+=(L 47, IH-..,_,i_l_T__- 11
l
I
l:
l'
'k _'- . -' -' I . I r- '- . 'l' Ill
i -.:'. _' i . :l .' I- :a i _ a.-- i in __.'_____- ___t __ _ i y s i i _ _ s _') _ __ _ Ill i 10
li
" "- f _: -. .
. = l_ ! h k
- _.O_"--''""' y--' !j I 'lt
!:'ffi-="J,a - - ) - - . ('-' FIRE LANE.TllRNl_NGRADIUS L-%- - - ---i--'-'li
: -. -. h- - - - .,
, , I .J0
"+-iin o 1--
*.-- *- -- -.-1y* -* -__:-- -- -- -_;_ x_
..'l 4__;;==-,.==',-m:-=-===-==;"=-(-=J
I l'.. l It I .____ . ____ _ _ _ _ _ ____ - -_ _-_ _'==''----+- f - - -- ' - ' - - - ' -' -!l i ' ... .... _... - a - oibT7 -)'a-Y////'/r----':'i-'__ ____'_:__ '/___ -' -- "ThT/"/'A : '.! l'/"2 V aa'A " i I/ " " aa" " A V '"A :l : - ' ,,, afaaa" _,_,,, aa'%,, a'aaaal+ I HROIFCT GFNFRAI NOTKSi - - - 000#X0 410}iaaaaaaa'aa
I 'ili Vlji 'llltm' iijii liIii '*i6 uOIOIONeOUf!JNI! I{ k 11 RIDII a a ! TOII i ins inutci nnti xm mF m tna umnaimn 011min uun iwi MDs uni in x riin T tw +CI Ilfl m {NU fflffl ffl ffl ffl ffl <ff }011
- - - - mtnt OI wtt7tmwm+
I In nft ll fat!11 ! Ill laThl Nm iR( IU nI m lu ilN!0 < luRLe UN( IVO(00111W W0m t)114!ull!IIN lm uRltal l t uuinai IRE00!ICIIII!Owt vt
iH4=HQ:i::i;im,,..., iiH';, (f
I
r
==
L,J
;B!g;{0%j,yHg47 (umtnEINglue! NTHnRtam(tall.MJAI Waffl 11911& tOlElll! !cau_l' - 20 li IN! OIJR!O if!l IIOWTffl M!lHt Illl! IIIORMII!}I Ni lOatT> It IIOOalulai TIN011011! AT Itf If!Cf!> in r ttsnui+ miinq. im t iuuh> OI I noiii O!INann*oti natniunwit nmni tJitnn +11ff(mt !41) UN i! OllMllal ft!11tAllOllA j:t\>,?M'XFJt!E""!tn!FF't"iSftY""'! !!uFj!t"!ffnit
ilii;;j7iIN NMtNll :)IAII !( Fl!ltll(OffiSl(! tNOu!ROT!0 ffiIIinOOIIOK km[lllCl :41l"7i%gji;ij%i%,8A%,%%:jgg(011,jJ41,%ljj,gj :i% t!
H5o@4y5i, 4t4yH; !!!!A@tggt,q5iy5;;4y
CITY OF SOUTH GATE
DEPART)jENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CVEN-180 j
Qff: CjTYVENTURES
.1,!C,yVenturei (ntt) )aallllj)NQ 218-1510 u_C
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 84531
PRELIMINARY FIRE ACCESS PLAN
1Cn30 ADELLA AVENUE
5 s
[
("'l'i RED CIIRB PAVEIIENT ilARKING .. -.. aa-.- - - - - - - - --.-= - - -- -- -= - - - -- - -- -- - ----- - ---= --- ( ,,, m, iiilgt 7zjut;qtgt4) %lQuRu n0 101 01010 }00 #%%0 %0. +a0asa 0 ##%II00 311
ATTACHMENT C
Below is a link to the CEQA Exemption Report:
https://wwwi.cityofsoutligate.org/files/assets/public/v/1/ 10130-adella-ce-report-wappei'idicesfinal-03 ll25.pdF A physical copy is also available for viewing at the Planning Division office, located at 8650 California Avenue, South Gate, CA 90280.
312
Attachment F
ATTACHMENT F
Below is a link to the CEQA Exemption Report:
https://www.cityofsoutligate.org/files/assets/pciblic/v/ l/l 0 130-adella-ce-report-wappei'idicesfinal-03 ll25.pdf A physical copy is also available for viewing at the Planning Division office, located at 8650 California Avenue, South Gate, CA 90280.
zqL)313
Attachment G
CITY VENTURES
Building It Forward
May 19, 2025
Mr. Gabriel Perez
Community Development Director
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
RE: Request for Removal or Modification of Condition of Approval #60 - Case Nos.: APR No.
PL24-0070 & TTM No. PL24-0068-10130 Adella Avenue (APN: 6221-026-020) Dear Gabriel,
This letter is submitted as a follow-up to the April 24, 2025 correspondence from Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP with the subject Line "Letter to City re Appear and Condition No. 60." As noted in that letter, we respectfully request the removal or modification of Condition of Approval No. 60, which mandates the replacement of the existing k-rail at the intersection of AdeLLa Avenue and Legacy Lane with an automated gate arm or similar device.
We nOW Write tO supplement our prior request With the findings from the TraffiC and Circulation Stuoy completed by TJW Engineering, dated May 16, 2025 (the "TJW Traffic Study"), which confirms that the existing k-rail does not pose a safety concern and that the project does not require modification of existing emergency access infrastructure.
1. The TJW Traffic Study Confirms Project Does Not Create Unsafe Conditions The TJWTraffiC Stud'y analVzed four intersections and One roadwaV segment, including all driveways and adjacent access points. It concludes that all intersections will operate at Levelof Service(LOS)A,indicatingfree-flowtraffic with nocongestion. Theproject 8enerates only 364 daily trips, including 22 AM and 28 PM peak-hour trips, which do not rise to any threshold of significance under local policy or well-accepted standard for potential impacts to intersection operation.
Further, the analysis confirmed ttiat the existing stopping Sight distance (SSD) along Legacy Lane meets Caltrans safety requirements, and that pedestrian and cyclist visibility and access are preserved. The report explicitly states:
"The proposed project is not anticipated to affect pedestrian or bicycie safety atong Legacy Lane or the project frontage... Low-speed conditions, existing sidewalks, and driveway sightlines support a safe environment for al/ users. 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92612
2-RS314
The report also accounted for a permanent barrier in place between Adella Avenue and ALdrich Road, such as the existing K-Rail, and concluded that even with the road being closed, there was no safety concern for emergency vehicles needing an additional point of access.
2. DenserProjectWasPreviouslyApprovedwithPermanentBollards The previously approved Legacy Apartments project, consisting of 78 units, was not required to remove the k-rail and install an automated gate. Instead, it was conditioned to install permanent bolLards, maintaining restricted access at AdelLa Avenue. The City concluded that the denser, more impactful project posed no emergency access issues with a permanent barrierin place.
3. LACFD Review Confirms Emergency Access is Sufficient As confirmed in the City's deemed complete letter, the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) was responsible for reviewing emergency access and circulation. LACFD's April 7, 2025 letter and site plan stamp identify only one public safety requirement: the installation of a fire hydrant on Legacy Lane. No modifications to the k-rail were requested. LACFD cleared the project for public hearing, confirming compliance with emergency access standards.'
4. No Nexus or Rough Proportionality for K-Rail Removal Because there is no reasonable relationship between the replacement of the k-rail and the prOjeCt, requiring the appliCant tO remOVe Or replaCe the k-rail iS net legally supportable under the No(ran/Dolan or Koontz standards. There is no nexus between the project's actuaL impacts and the requested infrastructure change, nor is the requirement proportional to the project's traffic or circulation footprint. As such, the condition would constitute an unconstitutional exaction.
5. Neighborhood Support to Removed Condition
CityVentures has proactively metwith the appellant, South Gate Progress Partners, and their Legal counsel. Based on these discussions, we understand that SGPP would be comfortable With the City removing COnditiOn N0. 60 and We are workingwith SGPP On language tO mOdity the condition.
' The project's CEQA exemption analysis explains, with respect to emergency access, that "LACFD would review the project for access requirements, minimu m roadway widths, fire apparatus access roads, fire Lanes, signage, and access walkways, among other requirement to ensure adequate emergencyaccess would be provided to end within the project site." LACFD, the agency recognizes with expertise regarding emergency access, concluded that emergency access was adequate and appropriate. The CEQA Exemption states definitively:"[a]pproval by the Fire Department would ensure that project construction and operations would not result in inadequate emergency access and impacts would be less than significant." There is no mention whatsoever of the need to replace the k-rail. The CEQA exemption analysis also notes that the project "would not alter geometric design of the site (e.g., introduce sharp curves, dangerous intersections, blind spots, etc.) and, therefore, would not create a hazard due to a geometric design feature. 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92612
l"\? 315
6. City Ventures Remains Willing to Contribute
Despite the lack of necessity, City Ventures is willing to cooperate with the City and offer a reasonable monetary contribution if such a gesture would assist in addressing broader mobility needs.
In the event City Staff cannot agree to remove the condition, City Ventures has been working with South Gate Progress Partners on revised Language to modify Condition No. 60 in a manner satisfactoryto both parties:
"The Applicant shall pay to the City $10,000, which the City may use toward the design, permitting, installation, and inspection of a permanent, City-owned and maintained automated gate system to replace the existing K-rail barrier at the intersection of Adella Avenue and Legacy Lane. To the extent the City, in its discretion and sole responsibility, proceeds with repLacement of the existing K-rail the repiacement gate shali be used exclusively for emergency vehicle access and pubiic maintenance purposes. The gate shaft be constructed by the City and its design must be approved through the City's standard review processes, including public outreach, environmentai compliance, and consultation With pLlbtiC Safet5/ and SChOOl diStriCt OffiCiatS. The gate Sh8tl be pt5!SiC81l'yf SeCLlred against unauthorized access and prominently signed to indicate that pubiic vehicuLar access is prohibited. The gate shall not be used to facilitate general vehicuiar traffic under any circumstances."
The City's continued insistence on a condition for which there is no reasonable basis or essential nexus would not only be a constitutional violation, but a denial of the project under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA).
In conclusion, the TJW Traffic Study confirms no safety or operational issues, LACFD found no emergency access concern, and there is no precedent or legal basis for requiring the k-rail's replacement. We respectfully request that Condition No. 60 be removed or modified to eliminate the k-rail replacement requirement prior to the City Council's final action on the appeal.
Please feel free to contact me if additional intormation or clarification is needed.
Respectfully,
Nick Patterson
Director of Development
P: (763) 244-9855
E: [email protected]
3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92612
K7316
May 16, 2025
Mr. Nick Patterson
CITY VENTURES
3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92612
SUBJECT: Legacy Lane Traffic & Circulation Study
City of South Gate, California
Dear Mr. Patterson,
TJW ENGINEERING, INC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING&
TRANSPORTATIONPLANNING
CONSULTANTS
TJW Engineering, Inc. (TJW) is pleased to submit this Traffic and Circulation Study for the proposed project located at the southeast corner of Legacy Lane and Adella Lane in the City of South Gate, California. The proposed project is for the construction of 54 residential townhomes. The purpose of this Traffic and Circulation Study is to provide a summary review of the potential traffic impacts of the proposed project.
PROPOSED PROJECT
The site for the proposed project is located at the southeast corner of Legacy Lane and Adella Lane in the City of South Gate, California. The proposed project is for the construction of 54 residential townhomes. The site will be accessible via three proposed full-access driveways along Legacy Lane. Existing street parking on Legacy Lane will remain available. See Appendix A for a copy of the project site plan.
STUDY AREA AND PARAMETERS
This study reviews four (4) study intersections and one (1) roadway segment.
Driveway Intersections:
Project Driveway #1 / Legacy Lane
Legacy High School Softball Field Driveway #1 / Legacy Lane Proposed Driveway #2 / Legacy Lane.
Legacy High School Softball Field Driveway #2 - Project Driveway #3 / Legacy Lane Roadway Segment:
1) Legacy Lane between the 90-degree curve and Burtis Street. 9841 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 200 l Irvine, California 92618 l t: (949) 878-3509 www.tjwengineering.com
lo!F5317
Mr. Nick Patterson
Legacy Lane Traffic & Circulation Study
May 16, 2025
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The two (2) Existing studyintersections include two (2) gated driveways for the parking lot of the Legacy High School Softball Field, opposite the proposed project. Street-parking and sidewalks exist along both sides of Legacy Lane. A bike path exists along the Los Angeles River which lies approximately 500 feet to the east of the project site.
Traffic volumes at the Existing study intersections and roadway segment were collected on Wednesday, April 30, 2025 over a 12-hour period between 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Pedestrian and cyclist volumes were also collected along the roadway segment. The data collected is provided in Appendix B.
Existing Traffic Volumes
At Intersection 2, the gate for the westerly Softball Field Driveway #1 was observed to be closed until approximately 3:00 PM. Therefore, any vehicles counted at Intersection 2 before 3:00 PM were vehicles traveling through on Legacy Lane. During the 12-hour observation period, a total of 277 vehicles were counted at Intersection 2 including 29 during the AM peak hour and 69 during the PM peak hour. Between 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM when the gate was opened, a total of 52 vehicles were observed entering the parking lot and 56 exiting. The gate for the easterly Driveway #2 was observed to be closed for the entire 12-hour observation period. A total of 184 vehicles were counted traveling on Legacy Lane between the 90-degree curve and Burtis Street.
Existing Pedestrian and Cydist Volumes
Over the 12-hour observation period, a total of 62 pedestrians and 49 cyclists mere counted on Legacy Lane between the two Legacy High School Softball Field driveways. Of the pedestrians, 21 were observed walking along the parking lot frontage, 27 along the proposed project frontage, and 14 along both sides of the roadway due to crossing mid-block. The largest number of pedestrians, 23 total, observed during a 1-hour period occurred between 8:15 AM - 9:15 AM. The cyclists were evenly distributed with 24 traveling eastbound and 25 westbound. The largest number of cyclists, 10, observed in either direction during a1-hour period occurred between 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM.
TJW Engineering, Inc.
CVR25005LegacyLane Traffic & Circulation Study 05162025 318
Mr. Nick Patterson
Legacy Lane Traffic & Circulation Study
May 16, 2025