South Gate City Council
May 27, 2025

SOUTH GATE CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, May 27, 2025 at 6:30 p.m.

SOUTH GATE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
8650 CALIFORNIA AVE
SOUTH GATE, CA 90280
VIEW MEETING LIVE ONLINE AT:

HTTPS://YOUTUBE.COM/@SOUTHGATECA90280
City Officials
MAYOR, Maria Davila CITY CLERK, Yodit Glaze
VICE MAYOR, Joshua Barron CITY TREASURER, Jose De La Paz COUNCIL MEMBER, Maria del Pilar Avalos CITY MANAGER, Rob Houston COUNCIL MEMBER, Gil Hurtado CITY ATTORNEY, Raúl F. Salinas COUNCIL MEMBER, Al Rios
If you would like to participate in this meeting, you can participate via the following options:

1. VIEW THE MEETING LIVE ONLINE AT: https://youtube.com/@SouthGateCA90280 Please allow up to 24 hours after the meeting for the archive to be available.

2. PARTICIPATE BEFORE THE MEETING by emailing the City Clerk at:
[email protected] no later than 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Please write "Public Comment" in the subject line.

3. ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON
*The disruption in service of any alternative method does not prelude the City Council or other legislative
body from taking further action and moving forward on the agenda.

Meeting Schedule
The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, 1 closed session business will usually commence at 5:30 p.m., when scheduled, and general business session will commence at 6:30 p.m.

Brown Act
Agendas are drafted to accurately state what the legislative body is being asked to consider. The legislative body can take action on "all items" listed on the agenda and be in compliance with the open meeting laws. Under the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The governing body may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future meeting.

City's Vision Statement
We envision a thriving, safe and inclusive community where everyone has the opportunity to access exceptional services, education and support to be resilient and live full, vibrant lives.

Public Communications
Public Comments on agenda items are limited to three (3) minutes. All comments are to be addressed directly to the Agency Members not to the members of the public.

Emails for public comment received prior to 4:00 pm on the day of the Council Meeting will be summarized by the City Clerk, not read in its entirety. A copy of the email will be provided to the City Council and will also be available at the City Clerk's Office for public review. A copy of each email will be recorded for public record and noted on the official minutes of tonight's meeting.

Call to Order/Roll Call With Invocation & Pledge
CALL TO ORDER: Maria Davila, Mayor
INVOCATION: Pastor Raul Flores, Ministerio Monte De Alabanza PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Luis Frausto, Director of Admin. Services ROLL CALL: Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
City Council Appointments to Outside Boards and Agencies

1. City Council Appointments to Outside Boards and Agencies The City Council will consider: (CM)
a. Ratifying the appointment by Council Member Maria del Pilar Avalos of Margarita Valenzuela to the Planning Commission. (CM)
Documents:

Item 1 Report 05272025.pdf
Public Hearings

2. Resolution Ordering the Levy of Annual Assessment for FY 2025/26 for Street 2 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
The City Council will consider: (PW)
a. Adopting a Resolution ordering the levy of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Assessment for the Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District No. 1.

Documents:

Item 2 Report 05272025.pdf

3. Appeal – City Ventures Presentation
The City Council will consider: (CD)
a. Determine that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the project qualifies for a categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, (Class 32) “In-Fill Development Projects”, and is thereby exempt from CEQA. The project site is surrounded by urban uses and the proposed residential condominium subdivision will be compatible with surrounding existing development. b. Uphold the action taken by the Planning Commission at its March 18, 2025, meeting, by adopting a Resolution attached hereto (Attachment A), approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531 associated with the 54-unit townhome development at 10130 Adella Avenue.

Documents:

Item 3 Report 05272025.pdf
Item 3 - Attachment A.pdf
Item 3 - Attachment B.pdf
Item 3 - Attachment C.pdf
Item 3 - Attachment C1.pdf
Item 3 - Attachment D.pdf
Item 3 - Attachment E.pdf
Item 3 - Attachment F.pdf
Item 3 - Attachment G.pdf
Comments From The Audience - Non-Agenda Items
During this time, members of the public may address the City Council regarding any items not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council and not on this agenda. Comments from the audience will be limited to three (3) minutes per speaker; unless authorized by the Mayor, the time limit may not be extended by utilizing another member's time. There will be no debate or action on items not listed on the agenda unless authorized by law. The collective initial period of time for comments from the audience shall be limited to 45 minutes. Any speaker that did not get a chance to speak during this segment due to the 45-minute limitations will be able to speak at the end of the meeting prior to adjournment.
3 Note: The City Council desires to provide all members of the public with the opportunity to address the Council. Nevertheless, obscene language, comments intended to disrupt/interfere, other actions which disrupt the progress of the meeting or slanderous comments will not be tolerated and may result in ejection and/or may constitute a violation of South Gate Municipal Code Section1.04.110.

Reports And Comments From City Officials
During this time, members of the City Council will report on matters pertaining to their service on various intergovernmental boards and commissions as a representative of the City pursuant to Assembly Bill 1234. City Council Members will also have an opportunity to comment on matters not on the agenda.

Consent Calendar Items
Agenda Items 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 are Consent Calendar Items. All items including Ordinances, Resolutions and Contracts, may be approved by adoption of the Consent Calendar, individually and collectively by one (1) motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council, the public, or staff request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action. Members of the public are permitted to speak on any item listed but their time period is limited to three (3) minutes in total.

Any motion to introduce or adopt an Ordinance on the Consent Calendar shall be: (1) a motion to waive the reading of the Ordinance and introduce the Ordinance or (2) a motion to waive the reading of the Ordinance and adopt the Ordinance, as appropriate.

4. Approve Tweedy Mile Advisory Board Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26 and Resolution to Collect Assessments for the Parking and Business Improvement Area
The City Council will consider: (CM)
a. Approving the Tweedy Mile Advisory Board’s Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26; and
b. Adopting a Resolution declaring the City’s intention to levy and collect assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26 for the Parking and Business Improvement Area (known as the Tweedy Mile Business District) Business License, and scheduling a Public Hearing for June 24, 2025
Documents:

Item 4 Report 05272025.pdf

5. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-96-AC w/ and Hinderliter De Llamas & Associates, Inc., for Business License Administration and Business License Discovery/Compliance Services
4 The City Council will consider: (AS)
a. Approving Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2024-96-AC with Hinderliter De Llamas & Associates (“Agreement”), through December 31, 2027, for Business License Administration and Business License Discovery/Compliance Services to add business license permit administration services, with an estimated additional annual cost of $6,000, and a one-time $1,500 implementation fee;
b. Appropriating $7,500 from the General Fund balance to expenditure account number 100-302-12-6101 (Professional Services) to fund the Business License Administration and Business License Discovery/Compliance Services; and c. Authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

Documents:

Item 5 Report 05272025.pdf

6. Approve Agreement w/ Superior Pavement Markings, Inc., for Construction of the Thermoplastic Striping of Streets Citywide, Phase II, #735-ST The City Council will consider: (PW)
a. Approving an Agreement with Superior Pavement Markings, Inc. (“Agreement”), for the construction of the Thermoplastic Striping of Streets Citywide Project Phase II, City Project No. 735-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed $94,511; b. Authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney;
c. Authorizing the City Manager to execute change order in the amount of $37,400 for additional striping of streets citywide;
d. Declaring the Thermoplastic Striping of Streets Citywide Project Phase II, City Project No. 735-ST, categorically exempt under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”); and e. Approving the Notice of Exemption for the construction of the Thermoplastic Striping of Streets Citywide Phase II, City Project No. 735-ST and directing the City Clerk to file it with the Los Angeles County Registrar Recorder’s Office.

Documents:

Item 6 Report 05272025.pdf
5 7. Approve a Lease Agreement w/ Lease Servicing Center, Inc., dba NCL Government Capital for one 2025 Ford Maverick vehicle to replace aging Parking Enforcement vehicles for the Police Department
The City Council will consider: (PD)
a. Approving a 5-year Lease Agreement with Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital (“NCL”) for the lease of one 2025 Ford Maverick vehicle to be used as a Parking Enforcement vehicle for the Police Department in the amount of $7,785 per year for a total amount of $39,425, including a $500 closing fee; b. Approving lease payments in the amount of $7,785 to be budgeted annually for five (5) years in the General Fund starting in Fiscal Year 2024/2025 and a $500 closing fee in Fiscal Year 2024/2025;
c. Approving a Purchase Order Agreement with Commline Inc., for the purchase and installation of necessary emergency equipment and MDC to outfit the Parking Enforcement vehicle in the amount of $14,035; and
d. Authorizing the Mayor to execute the lease Agreement and any other documents that may be necessary to acquire the vehicles in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

Documents:

Item 7 Report 05272025.pdf

8. Approve the use of 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program Subrecipient Agreement Grant Funds
The City Council will consider: (PD)
a. Authorizing utilization of 2023 Homeland Security Grant Program Funds in the amount of $40,000 for law enforcement equipment to address civil unrest, crowd control and active shooters; and
b. Increasing the Fiscal Year 2025/26 revenue projection in Account Number 232-541 (Law Enforcement Grants – Homeland Security Grant) to $40,000; and c. Amending the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Law Enforcement Grants Fund Budget by appropriating $40,000 to Account Number 232-541-21-6204 (Law Enforcement GrantsHomeland Security Grant – Small Tools and Equipment); and d. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the State Homeland Security Grant Program Subrecipient Agreement for Grant Year 2023.

Documents:

Item 8 Report 05272025.pdf
6 9. Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 2023-66-CC w/ WGJ Enterprises, Inc., for the Construction of the Thermoplastic Striping of Streets Citywide Project, #654-ST
The City Council will consider: (PW)
a. Approving Contract Change Order 2 to Contract No. 2023-66-CC (“Agreement”) with WGJ Enterprises, Inc., dba PCI (“WGJ”), to re-stripe additional crosswalks and pavement markings under the Thermoplastic Striping of Streets Citywide, City Project No. 654-ST, in the amount of $56,600; and
b. Authorizing the Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works to execute Contract Change Order No. 2.

Documents:

Item 9 Report 05272025.pdf

10. Approve Purchase Order to LA County Public Works for Emergency Call Out at the Intersection of Santa Ana Street and Palm/Seville
The City Council will consider: (PW)
a. Approving a Purchase Order for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (“County”), Service Request No. 272919 to fund emergency call-out traffic signal repairs at the intersection of Santa Ana Street and Palm/Seville, for an amount not to exceed $60,500; and
b. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Purchase Order, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Documents:

Item 10 Report 05272025.pdf

11. Approve Minutes for the Special and Regular Council Meetings of April 8, 22 & 29, 2025
The City Council will consider: (CLERK)
a. Approving the Special and Regular Meeting minutes of April 8, 2025; b. Approving the Special and Regular Meeting minutes of April 22, 2025; and c. Approving the Special Meeting minutes of April 29, 2025.

Documents:

Item 11 Report 05272025.pdf
7 Reports, Recommendations And Requests

12. The South Gate Forward Land Use Study
The City Council will consider: (CD)
a. Approving an Agreement with De Novo for planning and environmental services; and b. Authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

Documents:

Item 12 Report 05272025.pdf
Item 12 - Attachment A.pdf
Item 12 - Attachment B.pdf
Item 12 - Attachment C.pdf
Item 12 - Attachment D.pdf
Item 12 - Attachment E.pdf

13. Approve warrant register for May 27, 2025
The City Council will consider: (SVCS)
a. Approving the Warrant Register for May 27, 2025.

Total of Checks: $4,260,535.89
Less: Voids $ (228,678.47)
Less: Employee Payroll Deductions $ (460,716.97)
Grand Total: $3,571,140.45
Cancellations: 2892, 110108, 110239
Documents:

Item 13 Report 05272025.pdf
Adjournment
I, Yodit Glaze, City Clerk, certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Meeting Agenda was posted on May 22, 2025, at 4:16 p.m., as required by law.

Yodit Glaze
City Clerk

GENERAL NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
8 The City Council adopted new rules relating to the conduct of the public meetings, proceedings, and business in the City of South Gate on July 12, 2022, (Resolution 2022-38-CC) and go into effect on August 1, 2022. Resolution #2022-38-CC is available at the City Clerk’s Office.

MEETING SCHEDULE
Regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, closed session meetings will commence at 5:30 p.m. unless posted otherwise on its agenda. The regular City Council meetings will commence at 6:30 p.m. Agendas are available at the following locations: City Clerk Office, Public Notice Boards at City Hall, and on the City’s web page at https://www.cityofsouthgate.org The Public can sign up to receive automatic notices of postings of agendas for the City Council or any other Commission or Board of the City of South Gate. Visit the City webpage and click on the Agenda & Minutes icon. That will take you the page where an individual can enter their email in the “Email Updates” box to register.

PUBLIC COMMENT/PARTICIPATION
Any person may request to address a legislative body during a public meeting. The Presiding Officer will call upon those present in the Council Chambers.

Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes on any item listed on the agenda, including public hearings.

Under Comments from the Audience portion, speakers are also limited to a single three (3) minutes time limit. Comments from the Audience is initially limited to 45 minutes at each meeting. Any speaker still wishing to speak, that did not speak, will have an addition Comments from the Audience opportunity after the last business item is finished. The Presiding Officer may extend the time limit as long as there is no objection from the City Council as a body.

To ensure that the public is able to participate, the City provides the opportunity to submit their comments in person, email, mail. Methods of participation may be subject to change during other such times when a State of Emergency, Health Order or State Executive Order limits in-person participation.

CURFEW
In absence of a motion duly adopted by majority vote of the City Council, the Presiding Officer may adjourn the City Council meetings at 10:30 p.m. The Presiding Officer may ask the City Council if any agenda items listed should be continued or dealt with during the meeting. For those items to be continued, the City Council can direct the item be placed on the next City Council agenda or the current meeting may be adjourned to a time certain at which time the meeting shall be reconvened as an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and action upon the published agenda continued.

STAFF REPORTS
As a general rule, staff reports. or other written documentation are prepared/organized with respect to each item of business listed on the agenda. Meeting agendas and staff reports are available at least 72- hours prior to the scheduled regular City Council meeting and a minimum of 24-hours prior to a Special City Council meeting. There are times when the City Council receives written material. revised material after the posting of agendas, these materials are become a public record and will be available for public view within 72-hours after the meeting in which they were received. Those materials and any other public document can be inspected in the City Clerk's Office located at 8650 California Avenue, South Gate.

SERVICES TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO PUBLIC MEETINGS
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the City Council Meetings, please contact the Office of the City Clerk. Notification 48 hours prior to the City 9 Council Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility. For further information, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (323) 563-9510 or via email at [email protected].
10 Office of ihe
SOuth Gate City Clerk Item No. 1
hih'm 2025 8'-Wc=rr=
FILED Ciffl of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL
A(C3-ENIDA JJBnLL
Ciffl Manager:

For the egular Meeting qf May 27, 2025
Department: City Manager's Office
City Manager:

Ro Houston RobH
SUBJECT: CITY COtJNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO THE VARIOUS CITY COMMISSIONS,

COMMITTEES AND BOARDS
PURPOSE: This item was added to the Agenda of May 27, 2025, at the request of Council Member Maria del Pilar Avalos to make an appointment to the Planning Commission.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City Council will consider: (CM) a. Ratifying the appointment by Council Member Maria del Pilar Avalos of Margarita Valenzuela to the Planning Commission.

FISCAL IMPACT: None
ANALYSIS: This appointment would be effective May 27, 2025, if approved by the City Council.

The appointment must be ratified by a majority vote of the City Council.

BACKGROUND: Currently, Councilmember Maria del Pilar Avalos has a vacancy on the Planning Commission. In accordance with the MADDY Act, the City posted the opening of the position and entertained applications from the public for the required 20 days prior to appointment. Council Member Avalos has selected Margarita Valenzuela as her appointee and the City Council will vote on this selection for ratification.

The City Council may appoint at their individual discretion a representative to serve on the Planning Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Citizens Advisory Committee and the Tweedy Mile Advisory Board, Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2286, adopted on September 27, 2011. All appointments must be ratified by a majority vote of the City Council.

ATTACHMENT: Current Commission, Committee and Board Member Roster 1 11
Council Member Planning
Commission
$125/Meeting
l"'& 3"dTuesday at 6:30
pm
Parks &
Recreation
Commission
$75/Meeting
2"d Thursday at 7 pm
South Gate
Tweedy
Mile
Advisory
Board
l"Monday at 5
pm
Citizens Advisory Committee
$25/Meeting
Meets as needed
Maria del Pilar Avalos
2739 Glenwood Place
Cell: (562) 719-1337
a 5 i
Lorena Morales
10420 Garfield Ave
Cell: (323) 387-5196
lemorales(2,yahoo.com
Ana Zavala
9222 San Vincente Ave,
Unit B
Cell: (310) 704-6949
Annnintert nQ-74-7n74 analuzavl(igmail.com
Elected: 03-03-2020
End of Term: Nov 2028
- - F F - -- ---a - - - a - - - a
Araceli Macias
9721 Aru'ietta Ave
Cell: (562) 673-4294
[email protected]
Appointed: 09-12-2023
i
Appointed: 39-12-2023
Joshua Barron
8819 Beaudine Avenue
Cell: (323) 791-5126
Daisy Prieto
9731 Bryson Avenue
Cell: (323) 707-3629
rlqiqvnriptriGiiff npt
Lizette Ruiz
10226 Kauffman Ave
Cell: (323) 253-9417
Andres Gonzalez
10509 San Carlos Ave
(323) 434-6894
Andres Gonzalez
10509 San Carlos Ave
(323) 434-6894
andres.gonzalezsn@,gmail.com
Mayra Castaneda
5740 Taft Ave
(562) 454-7949
[email protected]
J trill L);ltl4 0tJ l(111. 'l all00. (;U{Il Tyii-i-/a---T- - - - - - A yyriit'forl ' n ')_ 1 A _')rS ') 2 A xx.i;y+.i.-l - 111 1 A Q 111 J 11 uui4uy<Yaiiuu.LUlll 8nnre!l_!_nn7;ll?7Qnt/7)(Tm2il Cn 11 p p IJ ul lLu. UL ' 11 -L lJL J yppuuucu. U4-1%-4JL3 Elected: 11-08-2022
End of Term: Nov 2026
Appointed: 01-24-2023
Appointed: 01-24-2023
m
Appointed: 09-24-2024 Rosa Delgado
8829 Firestone Plaza
Cell: (626) 246-5793
rposada21t2,yahoo.com
Daysi N. Alonzo
9406 Kauffrnan Ave
(323) 404-763 4
[email protected]
Appointed:-02-14-2023 Appointed: 09-24-2024
Maria Davila
10035 San Luis Avenue
Cell: (323) 243-9947
Lizette Ruiz
10226 Kauffrnan Ave
Cell: (323) 253-9417
Cynthia Esquivel
4730 Tweedy Blvd
cell: (323) 747-0076
Angela Lucero
10300 San Jose Ave
(323) 540-3426
Marie De Lourdes Casttllo
10036 Sun Antonio Ave
(323) 567-5572
titomi6281@sbcglobal.

A52nll8hoMncCzaelWdaAv
Cell: (323) 405-2006
anthonyzepedalO(2Dyahoo.com
Iruuiz(a)yahoo.com [email protected] angela lncern@qhcgrihql co npt Annnintprla n(")a7_)n1zl Elected: 01-28-2003
End of Term: Nov 2028
Appointed: 05-28-2024 Appointed: 05-14-2024 '
m
Appointed :10-08-2024
Appointed: 02-18-2003
m ax
Revised: 05/05/202512
Al Rios
10406 0range Avenue
rr=lla (2':)':! l OlA_i'=Arl
Jimmy Ozaeta
2541 Kansas Avenue
Cell: (213) 400-0897
Edgar Pelayo
10207 Mallison Avenue
Cell: (323) 816-2904
Victor Zamudio
vmzamudio(2D,hotmail.com
Susan F. Janer
5314 Batavia Road
(323)7.17-42-4p. . .

Angelica Martinez
10129 0range Ave
/j i ) 1( < < n') 1 A
u V 11. I J4 _l ) ] l ffi - J J 'Y Ij iimmvozaeta(ahotmail.com piri{zlt'/nlnmi'iiT rrim Kosyallday($bcglobal.net (M_}) JkXl-Ul l'+ A -- .- :- 4 _ J. /l A 1 'l '1 /l '1 '1 AppOlIlTea: Ul-13-14 XalOSangle(al'y'allOO.COm -J Elected: 03-07-2017
Re-elected: 11-08-2022
Appointed: 01-10-2023 Appointed:01-10-2023
flpp()l[lLeu: U'4-14-IUII
Richard Gonzales
10328 Walnut Avenue
(626) 673-2571
[email protected]
Appointed:-01-23-24
ax
End of Term: Nov 2026 Appointed: Or-23-24
Gil Hurtado
10001 W. Frontage Road,
Mayra Castaneda
5740 Taft Avenue
r!.ll. /(<Yl Al;A 1(lAn
Alan D. Flores, II
5255 Almira Road
(TP!It' (Jl'? 'i lRn_')(s7J
Sylvia Masushige
8416 Beechwood Ave
rsrs':is 7ss_61 SQ
Andrea Martinez
10509 San Carlos Ave
martinezand [email protected]
Norma Mendoza
8691 San Gabrie} Avenue
Cell: (562) 277-2992
8pace I l:)
rX-11. /ifla)l Onj XffijO
(Cll. 3JIJL) %J'+-/7'+7
mrnriietiinprloQQgnT rnm
- - - - - I - - - ) - - - - 11 I[email protected]
l - - - ) - - g 11 1- /
grandmasylO [email protected] Appointed: 01-24-2023 Appointed: 05-12-2020 INllllldjll(;lluULa71'alli:!lll:lL'olll
Elected: 03-03-2020
End of Ternn: Nov 2028
Appointed: 3/25/25
Appointed: 05-12-2020
Appointed: 09-24-2024 i
Revised: 05/05/2025
13 j
Revised: 05/05/2025
14 Item No. 2
Of!icp of the
South Gate City Clerk
MAY2 2 2025
FILED
City of South Gate
I/:Z'/atvH

CITY COUNCIL
A(CDENDA JB3n.'LIl
Department Director:

Rob oustort
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ORDERING THE LEVY OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025/26

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, l
PURPOSE: To adopt a Resolution ordering the levy of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Assessment within the Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District No. 1.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council will consider adopting a Resolution ordering the levy of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Annual Assessment for the Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District No. 1.

FISCAL IMPACT: None, however, the cost of preparing the Engineer's Report was $8,307, and it was funded with Street Lighting and Landscaping Funds budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Municipal Budget.

NOTICING PROCEDURE: A Public Hearing Notice was duly published in the Los Angeles Wave, a local newspaper of general circulation, on May 1, 2025.

ANALYSIS: The assessment amount is currently set at $2.38 per adjusted front footage. The total revenue produced from this assessment has remained constant over the years while the total cost of maintaining the District has increased, leaving an operating shortfall. The revenue for Fiscal Year ("FY") 2025/26 is estimated to be $1,994,154, while the cost of maintaining the District is estimated to be $3,041,636. The operating budget deficit is $1,184,010, which is planned to be funded with restricted funds including Measure R, Gas Tax and Proposition A.

This amount includes $136,528 for the maintenance of the landscaped medians on Long Beach Blvd and Garfield Avenue recently constructed, which amount added to the deficit.

As a part of these proceedings, staff is not proposing an increase to the assessment rates. On April 26, 2016, the City Council authorized a financial analysis to identify alternatives to minimize the funding deficit which would be needed if the City Council wished to conduct Proposition 218 Ballot proceedings for new or increased assessments. A consultant conducted the analysis to determine the feasibility of increasing the assessment within the existing District to cover the revenue shortfall. Feasible alternatives recommended included creating new districts 1 15
to supplement the revenue from the subject District. New districts are created via separate and independent proceedings
BACKGROUND: Formed in 1981, the District operates under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (California Streets and Highways Code). It authorizes the City of South Gate ("City") to levy assessments on parcels receiving a direct "special benefit" from public improvements. Since the District encompasses the entire City, the assessment applies to all parcels citywide.

District revenue is restricted to its original purpose: maintaining and operating landscaping and lighting systems citywide and along City streets. Eligible expenditures include the operation and maintenance of: (a) Landscaping-trees, shrubs, grass, ornamental vegetation, irrigation, and drainage systems. (b) Lighting systems-illuminated signs, decorative fixtures, street furniture, streetlights, and traffic signals. These expenses cover both labor and materials.

Each year, the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office ("LA County") levies and collects the District's funds through the property tax roll on the City's behalf. To authorize this process, the City Council must take specific actions in compliance with the county's requirements and state law. The actions before the City Council are part of the required proceedings to grant this authority.

On February 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-03-CC, initiating the proceedings for FY 2025/26 and directing the Engineers Report to be prepared. On April 22, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-11-CC approving the Engineer's Report and Resolution No. 2025-12-CC declaring the City's intention to levy and collect assessments and setting a public hearing on May 27, 2025. The final steps in the proceedings can be achieved by conducting a public hearing and adopting the proposed Resolution ordering the levy of the assessments. The schedule for the assessment proceedings is as follows:

Date Council Action
2/28/2025 City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-03-CC initiating proceedings to levy assessments and to order the preparation of the Engineer's Report. 4/22/2025 City Council adopted the following Resolutions:

1. Resolution No. 2025-11-CC approving the Engineer's Report.

2. Resolution No. 2025-12-CC declaring the City's intention to levy and collect assessments and setting a public hearing on May 27, 2025. 5/27/2025 Conduct a public hearing and adopt a Resolution confirming the area boundary and ordering the levy of aru'iual assessments. 8/07/2025 Deadline for filing assessment roll.

An Assessment District authorizes the City to levy fees on specific parcels of land that receive a direct "special benefit" from public improvements. This District allows the City to provide e*anced landscape maintenance and street lighting along its streets, benefiting properties within its boundaries. Funding for these services comes from annual assessments paid by the benefiting property owners. To continue levying and collecting assessments for FY 2025/26, the City must prepare an Annual Report and hold a public hearing, as required by the Landscaping and 2 16
Lighting Act of 1972.

ATT ACHMENTS: A. Proposed Resolution
Notice of Public Hearing
Resolution No. 2025-03-CC*
Resolution No. 2025-11-CC*
Resolution No. 2025-12-CC*
KT:lc
*Each document is available for review through the City Clerk's Office. 17 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH

GATE, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE LEVY OF THE FISCAL YEAR
2025/26 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE STREET LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1
WHEREAS, the City Council previously fornned a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, such special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District");
WHEREAS, on February 28, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-03-CC initiating proceedings for the annual levy of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 assessments and ordering preparation of an Engineer's Report for the District;
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-11-CC preliminarily approving the Engineer's Report dated April 22, 2025 ("Engineer's Report") which is necessary to set the assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26 within the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, on April 22, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-12-CC to declare its intention to levy and collect the assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26 in the Maintenance District, as well as to set a public hearing for May 27, 2025, as a part of the proceedings, and did in fact conduct a public hearing on May 27, 2025;
WHEREAS, based upon the Engineer's Report, the following is hereby determined:

1. No new improvements and no substantial changes to existing improvements or zones are proposed for the next fiscal year;

2. Facilities to be maintained are those lighting and landscaping maintenance activities that take place within existing public streets and sidewalk rights-of-ways of the City;

3. The assessments shall remain the same as those to be levied in FY 2025/26; and WHEREAS, atthistimeallnoticeandpublichearingrequirementshavebeenmetrelatingto the subject proceedings, and the City Council is now satisfied with the assessment and all other matters as contained in the Engineer's Report;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby declare that the above recitals are all true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
4403991.2-L235.53 l
'7"
18 SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby declare that all protests and objections of every kind and nature be, and the same hereby are, overniled and denied.

SECTION3. TheCityCouncildoesherebyapprovetheEngineer'sReportandordersittobefiled in the Office of the City Clerk as a perinanent record which is to remain open for public inspection.

SECTION 4. The City Council does hereby confirm that the diagram referenced at Appendix A to the Engineer's Report, and the assessment roll referenced at Appendix B to the Engineer's Report, are as set forth in the Engineer's Report.

SECTION 5. The City Council does hereby acknowledge that the adoption of this Resolution constitutes the Fiscal Year 2025/26 annual assessment for the Maintenance District.

SECTION 6. The City Council does hereby order that the assessments authorized by this Resolution be used to fund the City's expenditures for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, including trees, shnibs, grass and other ornamental vegetation and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems and drainage devices, and public lighting facilities, including street lighting improvements, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities, located in public places within the boundaries ofthe City of South Gate, and for other incidental expenses authorized by the Act.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution which shall be effective upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 27'h day of May 2025.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

BY:

ATTEST: Maria Davila, Mayor
B7:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

F. Salinas, City Attorney
4403991.2-L235.53 2
5 19
oA.ttifl&hment B eotnhGateOJtyOhirk

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APR29 25
FlL§,g
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Cotu'icil of Sorith Gate, Califon'iiawill conduct a public lieaiing for the ptu'pose of adopting a Resolution confiiming the diagram and assessment and ordeiing the levy for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Street Lighting and Landscaping Special Maintenance District No. 1. A copy of the Engineer's Report may be reqxiested at the City Clerk's office duiing nor'inal business liours. The %blic Heating is sclieduled for:

DATE:

TIME:

LOCATION:

May 27, 2025
6:30 p.m.

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

SOUTH GATE CITY HALL
8650 CALIFORNIA AVENUE
SOUTH GATE, CA 90280
ThePublicHeaiingmeetii'igwillbeconductedinpersonorthroughvideoconferencing. Any coinments may be tnade in person at the hearing or in wiiting to the City Clerk ortlie City Council prior to tlie heaig.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that any and allpersons interestedinthematterhereinabove set forth areprivileged to attend saidheataing andthen and there testify orpresent evidenceupon any matter relating tliereto.

THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN by tlie order ofthe City Clerkof said Cityandis datedthis Apiil 29, 2025.

Y Glaze, City Clerk
Publication date: Thursday, May 1, 2025
Account No.: 251-714-25-6302
20 ul+ice (! the
Soutli Gate(:,ity Ciei Item No. 3
Mh'72:po;a: ll"' C'dy of South Gate

FILED CITY COUNCIL
AGEINIDA LBJ[T'L,Tfi
DepartmentHead:

FortheRegularmeetingofMay27,2025 A , 7i
0iina'erez tinD[e,fflartment: CommClu;iMtyaDnaegveelropmejkl RobHouston
M
SUBJECT: AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 84531 TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF ONE PARCEL INTO A 54-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 10130 ADELLA AVENUE, WITHIN THE

INDUSTRIAL FLEX (IF) ZONE IN THE TWEEDY BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN,

AND FINDING THE ACTION CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENT AL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
PURPOSE: To take public testimony and review evidence at a public hearing to determine whether to uphold or overturn the Planning Commission's decision regarding Vesting TTM No.84531; and whether to uphold the Planning Commission's recommendation by resolving to adopt the proposed Resolution; ortake other such action as may be determined by the City Council.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Following the conclusion of the public hearing, it is recommended that the City Council:
a. Determine that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the project qualifies for a categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, (Class 32) "In-Fill Development Projects", and is thereby exempt from CEQA. The project site is surrounded by urban uses and the proposed residential condominium subdivision will be compatible with surrounding existing development. b. Uphold the action taken by the Planning Commission at its March 18, 2025, meeting, by adopting a Resolution attached hereto (Attachment A), approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531 associated with the 54-unit townhome development at 10130 Adella Avenue.

FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal and/or resource impact on the City of South Gate ("City").

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: Advertising and notification of the public hearing was conducted in compliance with Chapter 11.50.020, of the South Gate Municipal Code. Notice of the hearing was originally posted and published in the "South Gate Press" newspaper and was mailed to the surrounding properties on May 15, 2025.
21 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: An environmental (air quality, noise, and traffic impact) analysis (Attachment F) was conducted for the proposed development, and based on the studies, it has been determined the proposed project would qualify for a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32 - Infill Development Projects) and would not have a significant environmental impact.

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Proiect Location:

Assessor's Parcel Number:

Proiect Applicant:
10130 Adella Avenue
6221-026-020
Subdivision of one parcel into a 54-unit residential
condominiurn development
Nick Patterson (City Ventures), South Gate 1 Inv, LLC
Jose Morales, on behalf of South Gate Progress Partners BACKGROUND: On March 18, 2025, during a regular Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2025-03 (Attachment B) involving the following action by a vote of 2-1:
* Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map ("TTM") No. 84531 to allow the subdivision of one parcel into a 54-unit residential condominium development located at 10130 Adella Avenue.

The Plaru'iing Cornrnission Agenda Bill for these actions is attached as Attachment E.

The Planning Commission meeting was well attended with eight speakers commenting on the subject project and four written correspondences received. Issues discussed involved the K-rail barrier on Adella Avenue, traffic, and environmental concerns. It should be noted that the development plan was approved by staff administratively and the only matter considered by the Planning Commission involved the TTM to subdivide the property for condominium purposes.

Following the Commission's decision, a group of residents expressed concerns about the project's potential impacts, particularly regarding the proposed replacement of the existing K-rail barrier on Adella Avenue. In response, City staff engaged in a series of meetings with concerned residents to better understand and address their concerns. During these meetings, staff provided clarification that AdellaAvenue would remain closed to regular vehicular traffic and that the intent of Condition No. 60 was not to re-open the street, but rather to support emergency access and City maintenance operations only.

To further address the residents' feedback, staff worked closely with the project applicant to revise the conditions of approval, specifically Condition No. 60, to more clearly reflect the City's intent and to ensure that any public improvements would be developed through the City's standard review and public outreach processes. However, the revised condition was not accepted by the residents and remains in its original form.

Despite efforts to address residents' concerns, an appeal was filed on April 7, 2025, by Jose Morales, on behalf of South Gate Progress Partners, challenging the Plaru'iing Commission's decision to approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531 and to classify the project as categorically exempt from CEQA.
22 On May 19, 2025, City Ventures submitted a letter addressing concerns, which included the site's traffic, circulation, and access. A traffic report (Attachment G) was also prepared by City Ventures' consultant.

ANALYSIS:

Appeal filed against the Planning Commission's Decision The appeal filed by the appellant (Attachment C) challenges the Planning Commission's March 18, 2025, approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 84531 and the corresponding Class 32 CEQA Categorical Exemption. The appeal asserts that the project does not satisfy all five criteria for the exemption and is subject to the "unusual circumstances" exception due to its proximity to a high school, unresolved traffic safety issues, and a history of site contamination.

Staff has reviewed the appeal in detail, including the accompanying legal memorandum, and offers the following responses to each primary area of concern:

1. Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Near Legacy High School Appeal Concern: The project site is adjacent to Legacy High School, and the appeal argues that this proximity creates unique and unresolved traffic and pedestrian safety issues. The replacement of a concrete K-rail with an emergency access gate, and the deferral of a comprehensive traffic study under Condition No. 60, are cited as improper under CEQA case law.

Staff Response: A preliminary traffic evaluation, including a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis consistent with CEQA Guidelines, determined that the project falls below established thresholds for significant traffic impacts. Therefore, the project qualifies for a CEQA Categorical Exemption (Class 32 - Infill development).

Condition No. 60, imposed by the Planning Commission, is independent of CEQA and is not intended as mitigation for any CEQA-identified impact. Rather, it will serve to evaluate fiiture improvements that could enhance emergency vehicle access and facilitate City maintenance operations in the project vicinity.

Adella Avenue will continue to remain closed to regular vehicular traffic. As part of the City's broader circulation planning and public safety efforts, Condition No. 60 requires the replacement of the existing K-rail barrier with a decorative-style barrier. This new barrier will maintain the current traffic restrictions while providing controlled access for emergency and maintenance vehicles. The barrier's final design and functionality will be determined through the City's standard review process.

To support this effort, staff has worked with the project proponent to revise Condition No. 60 to clarify both the City's intent to maintain the existing street closure and the funding mechanism for future public improvements. However, the revised condition was not accepted, and it remains in its original form.

2. Air Quality and Noise Impacts
Appeal Concern: The appeal raises the issue of cumulative air quality impacts, especially near a school and residential area already burdened by freeway traffic and argues for a fiill Health 23 Risk Assessment. Noise impacts, particularly during construction, are also flagged as a concern.

Staff Response: Air quality and noise assessments were prepared in accordance with applicable professional standards and regional environmental guidelines and concluded that the project's anticipated construction and operational emissions, as well as projected noise levels, will not exceed recognized significance thresholds. Although the project is categorically exempt from CEQA and not subject to formal mitigation requirements, standard conditions of approval and best management practices will help minimize temporary construction impacts, such as requirements for dust control and restricted work hours. There is no substantial evidence in the record indicating that the project would result in significant impacts related to air quality or nOlSe.

3. Soil Contamination and Site Safety
Appeal Concern: The appeal references the site's industrial history and alleges insufficient analysis of soil contamination and vapor intrusion risks. It argues that CEQA requires a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment and full disclosure of hazardous materials risks before project approval.

Staff Response: The site has undergone appropriate environmental review and remediation, and correspondence from the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Hazardous Materials Division confirms that the site has been adequately cleaned. This oversight ensures that the project does not pose a significant risk related to hazardous materials.

Furthermore, the project site is not listed on the Cortese List, which would otherwise trigger additional CEQA requirements. However, the applicant remains subject to the oversight of all applicable outside regulatory agencies. Any future work at the site must continue to comply with strict requirements and standards established by those agencies, including monitoring, reporting, and response protocols related to contamination. Based on the documented regulatory oversight, there is no substantial evidence in the record indicating the presence of environmental conditions that would preclude the use of a Class 32 categorical exemption.

4. Unusual Circumstances and CEQA Exceptions
Appeal Concern: The appellant invokes CEQA Guidelines §15300.2(c), claiming that the combination of school adjacency, deferred traffic analysis, and soil contamination constitutes "unusual circumstances" requiring disqualification from the Class 32 exemption.

Staff Response: The Class 32 exemption applies to infill projects in urbanized areas that meet five specific criteria, all of which this project satisfies. The "unusual circumstances" exception applies only if a fair argument can be made, supported by substantial evidence that a specific impact would result from the project's unique features.

In this case, there is no substantial evidence in the record demonstrating that these conditions rise to the level of a reasonably foreseeable significant impact. Although the project is near a school and on a formerly industrial site, these factors are not uncommon in urban infill development and are mitigated through standard regulatory procedures. The existence of community concern does not itself meet the legal threshold for triggering this CEQA exception.
24 CONCLUSION:

All applicable procedures in reviewing and approving Vesting TTM No. 84531 have been followed, including a thorough analysis of environmental factors consistent with CEQA requirements. The appeal does not present substantial evidence of significant environmental impacts or "unusual circumstances" that would invalidate the use of the Class 32 categorical exemption.

As such, staff recomtnends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's approval and affirm the CEQA exemption for the project by adopting a Resolution. Alternatively, City Council could consider upholding the Plaru'iing Commission's approval with a revised condition clarifying that Adella Avenue will remain closed to regular vehicular traffic and establishes the applicant's financial contribution toward future public safety and emergency access improvements to be implemented at the City's discretion.

The approval of Vesting TTM No. 84531 will become valid only if the City Council upholds the Planning Commission's action and exemption finding by adopting Resolution No. 2025-03.

Alternatively, if the City Council decides to overturn the Planning Commission's action, a Resolution (Attachment D) will need to be adopted accordingly ATT ACHMENTS:

A. Draft Resolution upholding the Plaru'iing Commission action with revised conditions of approval
B. Plaru'iing Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
C. Appellant's Appeal Letter dated April 7, 2025, and supporting documents D. Draft Resolution overturning the Planning Commission action and denying the request for Vesting TTM No.8453l
E. Planning Commission Agenda Bill, March 18, 2025
F. CEQA Exemption Report
G. Letter and traffic study from City Ventures dated May 19, 2025 25 Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF, CITY OF SOUTH

GATE, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO APPROVE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
84531 TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF ONE PARCEL INTO A 54-

UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMF,NT LOCATF,D AT
10130 ADELLA AVENUE, WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL FLEX (IF) ZONE

IN THE TWEEDY BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, AND FINDING THE

ACTION CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENT AL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, Nick Patterson, on behalf of City Ventures (the "Applicant"), filed a complete application requesting approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map ("TTM") to allow the subdivision of one parcel into 54 condominium units in connection with a proposed residential development located at 10130 Adella Avenue (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project site comprises approximately 2.02 acres, identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 6221-026-020, and is located within the Industrial Flex ("IF") zone of the Tweedy Boulevard Specific Plan (TBSP) area; and
WHEREAS, the Project involves new construction of 54 residential condominium units (for sale), comprising three-story attached townhomes in six buildings, and six (12 percent) of the units will be provided to moderate-income buyers; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to South Gate Municipal Code (SGMC) Section 12.10.060, the Vesting TTM shall be heard by the Planning Commission at a scheduled hearing; and action shall be taken to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove such TTM; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing to consider the matter on March 18, 2025, and after considering a presentation by the Community Development Department and listening to public corni'nents, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2025-03 to approve Vesting TTM No.8453 1 ; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, a timely appeal was filed by Jose Morales ("Appellant"), on behalf of South Gate Progress Partners, challenging the Planning Commission's decision to approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531 and to classify the project as categorically exempt from CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the appeal was filed based on concerns regarding the Project's proximity to Legacy High School, particularly related to traffic and pedestrian safety, and cited the replacement of a concrete K-rail with an emergency access gate and the deferral of a comprehensive traffic study under Condition No. 60 as improper under CEQA; and 1 26
WHEREAS, City staff reviewed the concerns and affirmed that the Project qualifies for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption under CEQA based on a preliminary traffic evaluation, including a Vehicle Miles Traveled ("VMT") analysis, and clarified that Condition No. 60 is not CEQA mitigation but rather a planning tool to evaluate future public improvements; and WHEREAS, in response to the appeal and to further clari'fy the City's intent, staff has coordinated with the Applicant to revise Condition No. 60, but to no avail; and WHEREAS, on May 27, 2025, this City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the matter, at which this City Council considered information presented by the Community Development Department, Applicant and Appellant, and listened to public comments about the issue. Notice of the hearing was originally posted and published in the "South Gate Press" newspaper and was mailed to surrounding properties on May 15, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines") and finds the project to be exempt under a Class 32 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 - Infill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby declare that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. After considering the information and public comments presented at the duly noticed City Council hearing on May 27, 2025, the City Council hereby upholds the Planning Commission's March 18, 2025 approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531, including the adoption of Resolution No. 2025-03, as modified by the revised Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The City Council finds that the issues raised in the appeal regarding traffic and pedestrian safety, including those related to the proximity of the Project to Legacy High School and Condition No. 60, do not present substantial evidence of a significant environmental impact under CEQA. The Council affirms that the Project qualifies for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption and that Condition No. 60 is a planning requirement unrelated to CEQA mitigation. All findings previously made by the Plaru'iing Commission in support of the Project approval and environmental determination are hereby affirmed, and all conditions, as revised, shall remain in effect.

SECTION 3. The City Council does hereby declare that if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Resolution or its application thereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision 2 27
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Resolution would be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution which shall be effective upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTF,D on this 27th day of May 2025.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

By:

Maria Davila, Mayor
ATTEST:

BY:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:Ra.lp=:,\'2.o.,ey
3 28
Exhibit 'GA"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Tentative Tract Map No. 84531)
Violation of, or noncompliance with, any of these conditions shall constitute grounds for revocation of this permit:

Planning Division

1. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of South Gate, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, orproceeding against the City of South Gate or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City of South Gate, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or administrative officers concerning the subject Application. The City of South Gate will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of South Gate and the Applicant will either undertake the defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal or other consultant costs or will advance funds to pay for the defense of the matter by the City Attorney.

If the City of South Gate fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible for defending, indemnify orhold harmless the City of South Gate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the Applicant's consent, but should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein.

2. Except as set forth in subsequent conditions, all-inclusive, and subject to department corrections and conditions, the property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the Application, environmental assessment, and plans submitted.

3. The proposed project shall comply with all Federal, State, County, and Local laws and ordinances that may apply to this permit, stated herein or not.

4. The approval for this Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall expire two years following the date of approval by the Planning Commission, consistent with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, as it exists or may be subsequently amended in Title 7, Division 2 of the Government Code, state of California, comrnencing with Section 66410.

5. The Community Development Director is authorized to make minor modifications to the approved preliminary plans or any of the conditions if such modifications achieve substantially the same results, as with strict compliance with said plans and conditions.

6. This Vesting Tentative Tract Map approval shall be contingent upon obtaining approval of Administrative Plan Review and Design Review for the proposed Project.

7. The Applicant and property owner shall agree in writing to the above conditions. 4 29
Public Works Department
General Conditions

8. Prepare street, drainage, water, sewer, grading, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, signing and striping improvement plans showing all existing and proposed public works improvements and dry utilities as outlined below. Said plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on City approved title blocks.

9. Provide an engineer's estimate for all public works improvements and pay all plan-check fees in accordance with the latest fee schedule prior to plan review.

10. Developer shall deposit $5,000 with the City to cover the City's cost for review of predevelopment submittals such as preliminary plans, including traffic, civil, planning and environmental consultants, etc.

11. The developer shall pay Road Mitigation fees in accordance with the latest fee schedule.

Residential Development fee is calculated at $2,492 per dwelling unit, unless otherwise exempt from the Road Mitigation Ordinance or waived by the City Council.

12. The developer shall pay LID Plan Check fees. Review is done by City's Environmental Consultant, John Hunter & Associates.

13. Pay permit, construction management and inspection fees associated with this project in accordance with the latest Public Improvement Plan Check fee schedule at the time of permit issuance and inspection.

14. Coordinate all Public Works improvements inspection with the Public Works Department at least 48 hours prior to cornrnencing work. Contact Jose Loera at (323) 563-9578 to arrange for a Public Works Inspection.

15. Developer's contractor, subcontractors, and consultants working on this project must obtain and pay City Business License and permits fees.

16. Prior to the City's acceptance of the public improvements, developer shall submit a refundable deposit in the amount of $3,000, which will be refunded upon receipt of "Record Drawings" for all the required improvements on approved Mylar(s) and AutoCAD files on a CD.

17. Comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA compliance) in regards to access ramps, sidewalks, driveway and any public access pathways.

18. Comply with the City's Community Development Ordinance pertaining to construction debris recycling. Contact the Building & Safety Department to obtain a Construction & Demolition Debris Waste Reduction Recycling Plan forms.
5 }o
30 19. Developer to contact the City's Waste Hauling Company (Universal Waste System) at (562) 334-3660 and obtain approval for the location of waste disposal container(s), including facilities for recycling.

20. The developer must comply with all applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) regulations.

21. Developer to coordinate with Southern California Edison Company for any improvements within their right-of-way.

Streets

22. Remove and reconstruct any and all damaged/or deficient existing improvements including but not limited to driveways, access ramps, curb and gutter, sidewalk within the parkway along the perimeter of the proposed development. Existing sidewalks with non-compliant ADA cross slopes exceeding 2% shall be replaced.

23. Construct new driveways at least 3 feet (for residential streets) away from any above-ground obstructions in the public right-of-way to the top of the driveway. Otherwise, the obstruction shall be relocated at the developer's expense. Ensure that each driveway provides proper pedestrian access across, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The final layout and site driveway design shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.

24. Proposed new driveways will meet the classification of commercial driveways (Minimum width required is 26 feet).

25. Slurry seal existing asphalt from the edge of the property line to the center of the street along the property frontage on Lagacy Lane and Adella Avenue. Restore signing and striping as needed. Limits of work to be identified on the civil improvement plans and approved by the City.

26. Developer shall execute a landscape maintenance agreement for the off- site landscape and irrigation system.

27. Construct new tree wells and plant new 48-inch boxed street trees on Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue. Install and weld decorative cast iron tree well covers. The species of any new street trees shall be in accordance with the Citywide Tree Master Plan. All tree wells shall be irrigated with dedicated irrigation line.

28. Proposed landscape shall be designed to incorporate water conservation techniques through application of xeriscape landscaping principles. Landscape plan to include low-water demanding plants with limited turf, efficient irrigation system and use of California native plants.
6 31

29. Limits of work to be identified on the civil improvement plans and approved by the City Engineer.

30. Any damages done to existing public improvements during construction shall be removed and replaced to original condition per the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

31. Any cross flow drainage from the property over the sidewalks is not permitted. Construct parkway drains as required.

32. Where utility cuts on concrete pavement are proposed, the entire concrete panel shall be removed and reconstructed from scoreline to scoreline.

33. Centerline ties, property corners and benchmark monument shall be preserved in the public right of way. In the event that ties, property corners and benchrnark monuments are disturbed or removed, a licensed surveyor shall re-establish and file required corner record survey with the Los Angeles County Surveyors office. All recorded copies of the documents shall be submitted to the City along with the final set of as-built plans.

34. In order to meet the City's Lighting Master Plan, developer shall verify that the frontage of the proposed development meets the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) minimum standards for streetlight illumination for Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue. If deemed insufficient, developer shall design and construct the necessary lighting improvements. Provide a photometric analysis for Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue. Install new streetlights if lighting distribution is inadequate

35. Paint property address on the curb, in front of the proposed development, to the City and Fire Departments satisfaction.

36. Clo.se existing driveway(s) on Adella Avenue and Legacy Lane, which will no longer be in use as part of the new development and replace with new curb and gutter and full-width sidewalk to match existing.

Riglt-Of-Way Easements and Tract map

37. Developer shall prepare and process documents for a Tract Map. The Tract Map shall be effective when the certificate of compliance and deed(s) has/have been recorded. No permit will be issued prior to recordation.

38. Additional dedication may be required at the proposed driveways to meet and comply with ADA requirements. Proposed driveways should provide pedestrian access across it with cross slope not exceeding 2% and maintain minimum width of 4-foot.

39. Developer shall submit the required document for the roadway dedication or any proposed easements. Comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, the City of South Gate Municipal Code and all the applicable state and local laws. 7 32
Grading and Drainage

40. Comply with all Federal, State, and local agency requirements pertaining to the Clean Water Act, which establishes regulations, set forth in the Countywide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Peri'nit.

41. Comply with the City's Storm Water Management Ordinance. Implement all NPDES requirements and Best Management Practices during and after construction. Provide and obtain approval of a site-specific Erosion Control Plan.

42. Submit a Grading and Drainage plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and Building Division. Show all existing and proposed driveways, curb & gutter, sidewalks, curb ramps, street trees, tree wells, street lights, street signs, power poles, fire hydrants, utility boxes, meters, curb drains, etc. on the plans.

Provide LID Plan and calculations required to address storm water discharge and NPDES requirements by City's Environmental Consultant, John Hunter and Associates (See attached requirements).

43. Submit Geotechnical reports, including but not limited to infiltration, percolation reports.

44. All on-site parking and circulation areas shall be paved as required by a pavement engineering or geotechnical report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, subject to the review and approval of the Public Works and Community Development Departments.

45. Provide a final detailed drainage study (prepared by a registered/licensed civil engineer) for review and approval. The study shall include existing and proposed hydrologic conditions as well as hydraulic calculations (per Los Angeles County format) for all drainage control devices and storm drain lines.

46. Grading plan will include geotechnical and geologist certification, stating that grading plan has been reviewed and found to be in confornnance with the recommendations as outlined in the soils and geological report.

47. Historical or existing storm water flow from adjacent lots must be received and directed by gravity to the street, a public drainage facility, or an approved drainage easement.

48. Dust control operations shall be performed by the developer at the time, location and in the amount required and as often as necessary to prevent the excavation or fill work, demolition operation, or other activities from producing dust in amounts harmful to people or causing a nuisance to persons living nearby or occupying buildings in the vicinity of the work. The developer is responsible for compliance with Fugitive Dust Regulations issued by the Air Quality Management District (AQMD).
8 l'7
33 Sewer

49. The developer shall prepare a comprehensive Sewer Capacity Study signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer addressing the sewer needs of the new proposed site and pay all required review fees. Initial deposit of $761 is required to initiate the plan check. Actual costs of the review will be billed to the developer as the plan check progresses. Based on the Sewer Capacity Study, the developer might be required to pay for any necessary sewer upgrades. The limits of the upgrades shall be to the downstream point of connection to where sufficient capacity exists. If in case the sewer connection is made to Los Angeles County sewer system, the developer may need to coordinate and get approval from Los Angeles County Sanitation District and pay any associated County fees.

50. Install adequate sewer lateral(s) to serve the proposed development, and abandon any existing sewer laterals at the main line and sewer cleanouts that will not be used, to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Building & Safety Departments. Sewer laterals will be abandoned in place with either cement slurg backfill or concrete bulkhead plug per City Standard Plans.

51. The developer shall consult the City Engineer to determine the sewer location and design requirements. Relocation of any public sewer lines shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. Pavement moratorium applies.

Water

52. Conduct a Water System Capacity Study and provide a copy of the report to the City for review and approval. If higher water needs are determined, then the developer will pay for any water upgrade needed to meet the demand. Developer to pay for all costs incurred for the review of the capacity study.

53. The developer shall submit water calculation for the City to run the calculations in the City's water module. The developer shall pay the water module capacity study at cost.

54. All proposed improvements shall be served by adequately sized to accornrnodate the total domestic, landscape and fire flows. Plans shall include size, type and location of the proposed fire hydrants approved by the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD). Provide fire flow calculations to justify the size and the velocity in the pipe (not to exceed 10 ft/sec)

55. Coordinate with the City's Water Division regarding removal of all existing water meters that will not be used by the development.

56. Existing water meter needs to be relocated or abandoned. Water meters are not allowed along driveways.

57. Abandon existing water meters shall be capped at the main line. 9 1"l
34 58. Developer shall pay Water Development Impact Fees per the latest City Fee Schedule. Fee is dependent on water meter sizes. Development Water Impact fees are paid at the time of obtaining the building permit.

59. Relocation of any public water lines shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer.

60. The developer shall prepare a traffic study, signed and stamped by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer, evaluating public health and safety issues, as well as traffic circulation and operations for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic within a 300-foot radius of the development. The analysis shall address student and pedestrian safety, traffic flow, emergency and non-emergency access, line of sight and internal circulation to assure for appropriate design for trash removal, on-site maneuvering, etc. within the site design as presented. As part of the project, the applicant is required to replace the existing "K-rail" barrier near the intersection of Adella and Legacy Lane with an automated arin gate, or like device (Automated Unit) to allow emergency vehicle access and non-restricted access at designated times, as determined by the City. The Automated Unit's design and installation shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works and will be maintained and operated by the City. Additionally, the analysis shall determine whether additional safety measures are needed to enhance student and pedestrian safety, such as signage, crosswalks, and traffic striping. New traffic signals, traffic signal modifications and/or traffic signal synchronization improvements are not a requirement of this project.

61. Internal circulation, particularly where there are trash pick-ups should be shown accoinrnodating the vehicles that will serve the development.

62. Clear unobstructed sight distance lines shall meet AASHTO guidelines and shall be shown on the improvement plans at intersections and/or driveways.

63. Upon completion of construction, developer shall remove temporary construction markings (USA marking).

64. All public and private signage and markings for vehicular traffic shall conform to the provisions of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD).

Utilities

65. Developer is responsible for research on private utility lines (Gas, Edison, Telephone, Cable, Irrigation, etc.) to ensure there are no conflicts with the site.

66. All existing on-site utility lines and existing utility lines serving the proposed development, that conflict with the project, shall be relocated, removed, or abandoned at the developer's expense to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pavement moratorium shall apply.

67. For all electrical needs the developer will coordinate with SCE Planner.

68. Any significant proposed utility underground vaults or meter shall be located away from the 10 1'7 35
proposed driveways.

69. Remove any abandoned above ground utilities within the Parkway area including but not limited service pedestals, pull boxes, etc.

70. All proposed on-site sewer, water, and drainage facilities shall be private system(s) maintained by the property owner.

71. All new utilities serving the property (Power, telephone, and cable television services, etc.) shall be underground. Pavement moratorium shall apply.

Use and Occupancy

72. Complete Public Works improvements prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy.

Developer may consult the Department of Public Works to request approval to implement and/or construct public improvements required in the conditions of approval after the certificate of occupancy is issued. The Department of Public Works may approve and/or deny approval of the request, partially or in its entirety, at the full discretion of the Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works. Any public improvements not completed prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy shall require the developer to enter into a development agreement and post the necessary securities in the amount approved by the Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works and in a form approved by the City Attorney. All public improvements shall be completed at the developer's cost.

73. The City reserves the right to add additional conditions as deemed necessary to comply with health and safety requirements.
11 36
Attachment B
RESOLUTION N0. 2025-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 84531 TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF ONE PARCEL INTO A 54-UNIT RESmENTIAL CONDOMINnJM DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 10130 ADELLA AVENUE, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICAJ,LY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.

W}IERF,AS, Nick Patterson, on bel'ialf of City Ventures (the "Applicant"), filed a complete application requesting approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to allow the subdivision of one parcel into 54 condoininium units in connection with a proposed residential development located at 10130 Adella Avenue (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Project site comprises approximately 2.02 acres, identified as Assessor's Parcel Nimber 6221-026-020, and is located within the Industrial Flex (IF) zone of the Tweedy Boulevard Specific Plan (TBSP) area; and
WHEREAS, the Project involves new construction of 54 residential condon'iinium units (for sale), comprising tbree-story attached townhomes in six buildings, and six (12 percent) of the units will be provided to moderate-income buyers; and
W'HEREAS, Pursuant to South Gate Municipal Code (SOMC) Section 12.10.060, the Vesting TTM sliall be heard by the Planning Commission at a scheduled hearing; and action shall be taken to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove such TTM; and WHEREAS, notice ofthePlanning Cornrnission public hearing ofMarch 18, 2025, was publisl'ied in compliance with State law in a local newspaper of general circulation. In addition, a public notice was mailed 10 days in advance of the hearing to each property owner, occupants and resident within a 1,000- foot radius of the project site, indicating the date and time of the public hearing in accordance with Califoiuia Government Code 65091; and
WHEREAS, on Marchl8, 2025 the Planning Cornrnission held a public hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the Vesting TTM, including without lin'iitation, information provided to the Plai'ining Corni'nission by City staff and public testimony; and WHEREAS, the Planning Comn'ffssion reviewed the Project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and detern'iined tl'ie Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption under Section 15332 (Class 32 - Infill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, tl'ns Resolution and its findings are made based upon evidence presented to the Commission at its public hearing including, without limitation, the staff report subinitted by the Coinrnunity Development Department; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of tlus Resolution liave been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. All of the facts set forth in the recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Plaiu'iing Conssion Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025
Page l of 9
t'7 37
SECTION 2. Based on substantial evidence, botl'i written and oral, from the public }iearing, tlie Planimg Commission finds that tlie approval of the Vesting TTM is consistent with the General Plan and zoning regulations, promotes tlie orderly development of the area, and suppoxts housing opportunities in accordance witli City policies and State laws.

SECTION 3. The Planniixg Cominission reviewed the project's environmental impacts uider the California Environmental Quality Act (Califoriiia Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., the"CEQA Guidelines") and finds theproject to be exempt under a Class 32 Categorical Exemptionprirsuant to Section 15332 (Class 32 - Infill Development Projects) of tlie CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations); and
SECTION4. ThePlanningCommissionlierebyapprovestheVestingTentativeTractMapNo.84531to allow the subdivision of one parcel into 54 residential condominium units for a development located at 10130 Adella Avenue, subject to the execution and fulfilln'ient of Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit "A" attached to this Resolution.

SECTION5. TlieSecretaryofthePlanningComn'ffssionsliallcertifytlieadoptionofthisResolutionand shall n'iaintain a copy in the official records of the City.

This recommendation was adopted by the following vote at the Plaruffng Con'imission meeting of March 18, 2025.

AYES: Ruiz, Ozaeta
NOES: Prieto
Approved and ADOPTED this 18ffi of March 2025.

Plag Manager
C laiu'ung Cornrnission
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025

38 Exhibit "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Tentative Tract Map No. 84531)
Violation of, or noncompliance with, any of these conditions shall constitute grounds for revocation of this permit:

Planning Division

1. The Applicant shall agree to defend, inderniufy and liold hannless the City of Sorith Gate, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of South Gate or its agents,officers or employeesto attach, setaside,void or annul, an approval of the City of South Gate, its legislative body, advisory agencies,or adtninistrative officers concerning tlie subject Application.

The City of South Gate will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding againstthe City of SouthGateand the Applicant will either undertakethe defenseof the matter and pay the City's associatedlegal or other consultant costs or will advancefunds to pay for the defense of tlie matter by the City Attorney. If tlie City of SouthGate fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, orproceeding or fails to cooperatefully in the defense,the Applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible for defending, indefy or hold harmless the City of South Gate. Notwithstanding tlie foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandonthe matter without the Applicant's consent, but should it do so, the City shall waive the indeinnification l"iereiii, except the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adversejudgment or failure to appeal, shall not carise a waiver of the indemnification rights herein.

2. Except as set forth in subsequentconditions, all-inclusive, and subject to department corrections and conditions, the property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the Application, enviroiunental assessment, and plans submitted.

3. The proposed project shall comply with all Federal, State,County, and Local laws and ordinances that may apply to this permit, stated herein or not.

4. The approval for this Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall expire two years following the date of approval by the Planning Commission, consistent with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, as it exists or may be subsequently amended in Title 7, Division 2 of the Government Code, state of Califoinia, commencing with Section 66410.

5. The Community Development Director is authorized to make minor modifications to the approved prelimiiiary plans or any of the conditions if such modifications acl'iievesubstantially the sameresults, aswith strict compliance with said plans and conditions.

6. This Vesting Tentative Tract Map approval shall be contingent upon obtaining approval of Administrative Plan Review and Design Review for tlie proposed Project.

7. Tlie Applicant and property owner shall agree in writing to the above conditions.

Planning Coi'i'unission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025

l"l 39
Public Works Department
General Conditions

8. Prepare street, drainage, water, sewer, grading, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, signing and striping improvement plans sliowing all existing and proposed public works improvements and dry utilities as outlined below. Said plans sliall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on City approved title blocks.

9. Provide an engineer's estiinate for all public works improvements and pay all plan-cbeck fees in accordance witli the latest fee scliedule prior to plan review.

10. Developer shall deposit $5,000 with the City to cover tlie City's cost for review of pre-development submittals such as preli.r'niitary plans, including traffic, civil, planning and environmental consultants, etc.

11. The developer shall pay Road Mitigation fees in accordance with tlie latest fee schedule. Residential Development fee is calculated at $2,492 per dwelling unit, unless otherwise exempt from the Road Mitigation Ordinance or waived by tlie City Council.

12. The developer shall pay LID Plan Check fees. Review is done by City's Environmental Consultant, John Hunter & Associates.

13. Pay permit, construction managetnent and inspection fees associated with this project in accordance with the latest Public Improvement Plan Check fee schedule at the time of permit issuance and iiispection.

14. Coordinate all Public Works improvements inspection with the Public Works Department at least 48 hours prior to commencing work. Contact Jose Loera at (323) 563-9578 to arrange for a Public Works Inspection.

15. Developer's contractor, subcontractors, and consultants working on this project must obtain and pay City Business License and permits fees.

16. Prior to the City's acceptance of the public intprovements, developer shall submit a refundable deposit in the amount of $3,000, wlnch will be refunded uponreceipt of"Record Drawings" for all the required improvements on approved Mylar(s) and AutoCAD files on a CD.

17. Comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA compliance) in regards to access ramps, sidewalks, driveway and any public access pathways.

18. Comply with the City's Community Development Ordinance pertaining to construction debris recycling. Contact the Building & Safety Department to obtaiii a Construction & Demolition Debris Waste Reduction Recycling Plan forms.

19. Developer to contact the City's Waste Hauling Company (Universal Waste Systeni) at (562) 334-3660 and obtain approval for the location of waste disposal container(s), including facilities for recycling.

Plat'u"iing Cominission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025

20 40

20. The developer nutst comply with all applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) regulations.

21. Developer to coordinate with Soutl'iem Califomia Edison Company for any iinprovements within their right-of-way.

Streets

22. Remove and reconstruct any and all damaged/or deficient existing iii'iprovements including but not limited to driveways, access ramps, curb and gutter, sidewalk within the parkway along the periineter oftheproposeddevelopment. Existingsidewalkswithnon-compliantADAcrossslopesexceeding2% shall be replaced.

23. Constt'uct new driveways at least 3 feet (for residential streets) away from any above-ground obstntctions in the public right-of-way to the top of the driveway. Otherwise, tlie obstruction shall be relocated at the developer's expense. Ensure that each driveway provides proper pedestrian access across, in compliance with the Ai'nericans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The final layout and site driveway design shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.

24. Proposed new driveways will meet the classification of cominercial driveways (Miniinun'i width required is 26 feet).

25. Slurry seal existing asphalt from the edge of the propexty line to the center of the street along tlie property frontage on Lagacy Lane and Adella Avenue. Restore signing and striping as needed. Limits of work to be identified on the civil improvement plans and approved by the City.

26. Developer shall execute a landscape maintenance agreement for tlie off- site landscape and in'igation system.

27. Construct new tree wells and plant new 48-inch boxed street trees on Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue.

Install and weld decorative cast iron tree well covers. The species of any new street trees shall be in accordance with the Cityvvide Tree Master Plan. All tree wells shall be irrigated with dedicated irrigation line.

28. Proposed landscape shall be designed to incorporate water conservationtechniques through application of xeriscape landscaping principles. Landscape plan to include low-water demandiiig plants with liinited turf, efficient irrigation system and use of California native plants.

29. Limits of work to be identified on the civil improvement plans and approved by the City Engineer.

30. Any damages done to existing public improvements during construction sliall be removed and replaced to original condition per the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

31. Any cross flow drainage from the property over the sidewalks is not pemiitted. Construct parkway drains as required.

32. Where utility cuts Oil concrete paven'ient are proposed, the entire concrete panel shall be removed and reconstructed from scoreLine to scoreline.

Plaru'iing Commission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025

41 33. Centerline ties, property corners and benchinark monument sliall be presersredin tl'ie public right of way. In tbe event that ties, propeity comers and benclunark monuments are disturbed or removed, a licensed sirveyor shall re-establish and file required corner record survey with the Los Angeles County Surveyors office. All recorded copies of the documents sliall be submitted to tlie City along witli the final set of as-built plans.

34. InordertomeettheCity'sLigl'itu'igMasterPlan,developershallverifythatthefrontageoftheproposed development meets the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) ininiinum standards for streetliglit illumination for Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue. If deemed insufficient, developer shall design and construct the necessary ligliting iinprovements. Provide a photometric analysis for Legacy Lane and Adella Avenue. Install new streetlights if lighting distribution is inadequate.

35. Paint property address on the curb, in front of the proposed development, to the City and Fire Departments satisfaction.

36. Close existing driveway(s) on Adella Avenue and Legacy Lane, whiclt will no longer be in use as part ofthenew development and replace with new curb and gutterand full-width sidewalkto match existing.

Right-Of-Way Easements and Tract map

37. Developer shall prepare and process documents for a Tract Map. The Tract Map shall be effective when the certificate of compliance and deed(s) lias/have been recorded. No perinit will be issued prior to final submittal and subject to the limitations of the Sribdivision Map Act.

38. Additional dedication may be required at the proposed driveways to meet and comply with ADA requirements. Proposed dtiveways should provide pedestrian access across it with cross slope not exceeding 2% and maintain minimum width of 4-foot.

39. Developer shall submit the required document for the roadway dedication or any proposed easements.

Cotnply with all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, the City of Soutli Gate Municipal Code and all the applicable state and local laws.

Grading and Drainage

40. Comply with all Federal, State, and local agency requirements pertaining to the Clean WaterAct, which establishes regulations, set forth in the Countywide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pertnit.

41. Comply with the City's Storm Water Management Ordinance. hnplement all NPDES requirements and Best Managemet'it Practices dumg and after construction. Provide and obtain approval of a sitespecific Erosion Control Plan.

42. Submit a Grading and Drainage plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and Building Division. Show all existing and proposed driveways, curb & gutter, sidewalks, curb rainps, street trees, tree wells, street lights, street signs, power poles, fire hydrants, utility boxes, meters, curb drains, etc. on the plans. Provide LID Plan and calculations required to address stonn water discharge and NPDES requirements by City's Environmental Consultant, John Hunter and Associates (See attached requirements).

Planning Con'unission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025

"12 42

43. Submit Geoteclinical reports, including but not limited to infiltration, percolation reports.

44. All on-site parking and circulation areas sliall be paved as required by a pavement engineering or geotechiffcal report prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, sulyject to tlie review and approval of the Public Works and Community Development Depaitments.

45. Provide a final detailed drainage study (prepared by a registered/licensed civil engineer) for review and approval. The study sliall include existing and proposed hydrologic conditions as well as hydraulic calculations (per Los Angeles County foimat) for all drainage control devices and storm drain lines.

46. Gradiiig plan will include geotechnical and geologist certification, stating tliat grading plan has been reviewed and found to be in confonnance with the recomi'nendations as outlined in the soils and geological report.

47. Historical or existing storm water flow from adjacent lots must be received and directed by gravity to tlie street, a public drainage facility, or an approved drainage easement.

48. Dust control operations shall be performed by the developer at the tinne, location and in the amount required and as often as necessary to prevent the excavation or fill work, demolition operation, or other activities fron'i producing dust in amounts harmful to people or causing a nuisance to persons living nearby or occupying buildings in the vicinity of the work. The developer is responsible for compliance with Fugitive Dust Regulations issued by the Air Quality Management District (AQMD).

Sewer

49. The developer shall prepare a comprehensive Sewer Capacity Study signed and stamped by aregistered Civil Engineer addressing the sewer needs of the new proposed site and pay all required review fees.

Initial deposit of $761 is required to initiate the plan check. Actual costs of the review will be billed to the developer as the plan check progresses. Based on the Sewer Capacity Study, tlie developer might be required to pay for any necessary sewer upgrades. The limits of the upgrades shall be to the downstream point of coni'iection to where sufficient capacity exists. If in case the sewer connection is made to Los Angeles County sewer system, the developer may need to coordinate and get approval from Los Angeles County Sanitation District and pay any associated County fees.

50. Install adequate sewer lateral(s) to serve the proposed development, and abandon any existing sewer laterals at the main line and sewer cleanorits that will not be used, to the satisfaction of thePublic Works and Building & Safety Departments. Sewer laterals will be abandoned in place with either cement slurry backfill or concrete bulkhead plug per City Standard Plans. 51, The developer sliall consult the City Engineer to determine the sewer location and design requirements.

Relocation of any public sewer lines shall be subject to approval by tlie City Engineer. Pavement moratorium applies.

Woter

52. Conduct a Water System Capacity Study and provide a copy of the repon to the City for review and approval. If higher water needs are detennined, then the developer will pay for any water upgrade needed to meet the demand. Developer to pay for all costs incurred for tl'ie review of the capacity study.

Planning Con'imission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025

23 43

53. The developer shall submit water calculation for tlie City to nin tlie calculations in the City's water n'iodule. Tlie developer sliall pay t}ie water n'iodule capacity study at cost.

54. All proposed improven'ients sliall be served by adeqriately sized to accorninodate the total domestic, laiidscape and fire flows. Plans shall include size, type and location of the proposed fire hydrants approved by the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD). Provide fire flow calculations to justify the size and the velocity in the pipe (not to exceed 10 ft/sec)

55. Coordinate with the City's Water Division regarding removal of all existing water n'ieters that will not be used by the development.

56. Existing water meter needs to be relocated or abandoned. Water meters are not allowed along driveways.

57. Abandon existing water meters shall be capped at the maiii line.

58. DevelopershallpayWaterDevelopmentImpactFeesperthelatestCityFeeSchedule. Feeisdependent on water meter sizes. Development Water In'ipact fees are paid at the time of obtaining the building pemiit.

59. Relocation of any public water lines shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer.

60. The developer shall prepare a traffic study, signed and stamped by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer, evaluating public health and safety issues, as well as traffic circulation and operations for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic within a 300-foot radius of the development. The analysis shall address student and pedestrian safety, traffic flow, einergency and non-emergency access, line of sight and internal circulation to assure for appropiiate design for trash removal, on-site maneuvering, etc. withinthe site designas presented. As part ofthe project, the applicant is requiredto replace the existing "K-rail" barrier near the intersection of Adella and Legacy Lane with an automated arm gate, or like device (Automated Unit) to allow emergency vehicle access and non-restricted access at designated times, as determined by the City. The Aritomated Unit's design and installation shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works and will be maintained and operated by the City.

Additionally, the analysis shall deterinine whether additional safety measures are needed to enhance student and pedestrian safety, such as signage, crosswalks, and traffic striping. New traffic signals, traffic signal modifications and/or traffic signal synchronization improvements are not a reqriirement of this project.

61. Internal circulation, particularly where there are trash pick-ups should be shown accommodating the vehicles that will serve the development.

62. Clear u'iobstructed sight distance lines shall meet AASHTO guidelines and shall be SIIOWII on the improveinent plans at intersections and/or driveways.

63. Upon completion of construction, developer shall remove temporary constniction markings (USA marking).

64. All public and private signage and markings for vehicular traffic shall conform to the provisions of the California Manual 011Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD).

Planning Coinn'iission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025

44 Utilities

65. Developer is responsible for researclionprivate utility lines (Gas, Edison, Telephone, Cable, Irrigation, etc.) to ensure there are no conflicts witli the site.

66. All existixigon-site utility lines and existing u(ility lines serving tl'ieproposed development, tliat conflict with theproject, shall berelocated, removed, or abandoned at the developer's expense to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pavement moratorium sliall apply.

67. For all electrical needs the developer will coordinate with SCE Plaiu'ier.

68. Any significant proposed utility underground vaults or meter sliall be located away from the proposed driveways.

69. Ren'ioveanyabandonedabovegroundutilitieswitbiritheParkwayareaincludiiigbutnotlirnitedservice pedestals, pull boxes, etc.

70. All proposedon-site sewer, water, and drainage facilities shall be private system(s) maintained by the property owner.

71. All new utilities serving the property (Power, telephone, and cable television services, etc.) shall be underground. Paven'ient n'ioratorium shall apply.

Use and Occupancy

72. Complete Public Works improvements prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. Developer may consult the Department of Public Works to request approval to implement and/or construct public improvements required in the conditions of approval after the ceitificate of occupancy is issued. The Depattment of Public Works may approve and/or deny approval of the request, partially or in its entirety, at the full discretion of the Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works. Any public improvements not completed prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy shall require the developer to enter into a development agreementandpost the necessary securities in the amount approved by the Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works and in a form approved by the City Attorney. All public improvements sliall be completed at the developer's cost.

73. The City reservesthe rigbt to add additional conditions asdeemednecessary to comply with health and safety requirements
Plaru'ffig Coinmission Resolution No. 2025-03
March 18, 2025

45 Attachment C
AprR7, 2026
South eote
""4l..i'l"ii.iiiuiii
C§d80uthGaffl
ernunlty DeMdopnt D€prtmant ffiPtanmr4Dlm0n
mO (4ffomla Amue
South(m& CAM280
I))
RE: AppealofPlannitigCommission'sCEQAExemptlonDeterminatiorifotl0130 Adella Avenue -VestingTeritative Tract Map No. 84531
TOWWI ItMay Oonmim:

On betialfof8outh Gate %@easparmeraand thaunderal@ied eonoernedreakjamsiUda letterserwas afomlappealofth@%rm@ngOomtmmiorlaMad $8, 202'5approval@f !mlngTemaihm'mtMapNoJ463j andtheaaWOmdCEQACtam!(Ate@)fiCat Emmptkin %rthe pmposed 54-tmUrealdet$loondornankaan pmj*dat 10130Adella Aminus.

We raiapectfullyaubmtthattheCEQAammption&a U@llyandfaetualLyunaupportm, $Cffi €Jl$ttle pr$atfallstomeettmarbriaofC,QGuidalinmll63324d),wtdeh requlmattmtthepiojectnmreautthi aa@immritmttemrebsuytomttto,nois4 *lrqta@4tty, OrWaWqmltg Fkarttmr* €heaxemgX €oiils:zLudedbyC4:QA €auidaunastt5800$)atti* lunusua[dmumstanms'exoeptlon.(See.full@nalyalabthaatta@hedExt*nAMemomndumr*.C!EQAOlass324:za@mealExemptkin) ThesiteisdkemlyaQattole@qHldi8ehool,wfdchcreatesunkluetmfficand pedesman safetyeoneemanottyplealofordlnaryirdillpr$ets. Tmatydefermd eqluatlOn €)ltebnpmt!ltOapOat4pptU!ffllstajdyund*rCOThdltkXINa 60, 0 dOferffll tmviotates*stabusheeic5@tmv(aee@umsmomv OounyofHendoeJho(1W8)).Tha remowlorrmdlfk,atlonoftheK-rallbamaronAdalLaAvenuefunheraaaoerbateatrafflc drculationeoncemsaridmayrwultinlnereasedembislona, noise,aridamatyrlsksto mudentsand rmddanta (See t*tfflraofoppoeltlon from oornmunlty realdems) 1 i = ,: 4 .
46 Soutb Gate
P"lJlQst rffiiiiisi
Residsms have msedserkiuseoneerns aboutthe mtte%historyoflmusmmiuse and Htemiaimtstmvaporoomaminmion.Unaercouiaaunassisize.z, enmental dsksfromsne contamlnatlon muatbedtaeRosedandmalymd prkirtopatapprovaL baxempn rmieaupOndmnotaeoountfOrMes mown rb*a, norltprovlds emdeneaofscotq@letedPfiase €l EmilmnmentalSiteAesmmentoraoornpmenshmdak ml$%l@nplan.

In$ offbeat4, Bilb!ftarlti$tmd €nefi[Xiat0tOQ)pOrtaThifal@ffMnt'ttlatttle pf'O%at nQ.ltin0amnt*nVlfUfW'mn4Ct8.Thi*mndaFd@WmlM)ffl5WHadlQOEQA aas*Um(8ar)kg/eyHmh/e)%semonv eftyof8e(20'PS)). requmbatyto WlthdflWth0aaXOfnptkanandpf$paff! afdlEnvlmemallmpaatReport(Ell. %urgettmC:ttytoaatinaeancewtth OEQA!aintentmd legalobllga €lons byrevoking tmcuner4memp$tonanaintUaAJ*mfflmnrnentalrwtew.Thehealtb, balmy, aridqualityof ut@of80uthOm'stesidenta-partiou%m}ueaanastu@emsnearthepr$et@ d@pond onathomi7@ add b'am@geiritmewprooemt
Sincereiy,
South Gate Progress Partners
mrlhgateprogresspartnets@gmnd,cam'
Tel:.(213) 460-0082
Coricerr'ied Resid'erixs of South Gate
211a-. ,,..
'17 47

EXHIBIT A
16 48
Memorandum re: CEQA Class 32 Categorical Exemption -
10130 Adella Avenue Project
Introduction
TlliS memorandum analYzes whether the City Of South Gate properly determined that the proposed 54-unit residential condominlum project at 10130 Adella Avenue qualifies for a Class 32 "inflll development" categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (C[QA}. It examines tlie project's consistency with the five criteria in C[QA Guidelines !?1S332 and evaluates potential exceptions that could preclude use of tlie eXemptiOfl. In parttcular, thiS analysis focuses on the criterion requiring no significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water qualily, and the "unusual circumstances' exception in CEQA Guidelines §1S300.2(c) given the project's unique features (e.g- proximity tO a kiigh school, deferred traffic analysis, emergency access design, and soil contamination issues), The goal is to provlde a clear, objective assessment of why the City's exemption determinatton is improper and an environmental impact report (EIR) is warranted under CEQA.

Issue
Issue:Did the City of South Gate correctly condude that the 10130 Adella Avewe 54-unit residential prOjeCt MEETSO//requirertlentS far a ClaSS32 CategOriC€d eXelnpriOnfrom CEQA,Or da the projeCt'S€hnraCteriStiCSand potential IMPARTS(partiCufarf7regardin(j trajfiC Safety noise, air quality, woterqtmlity,andnearbysensttivereceptors)triggerxheneedforfurtherenvironmemat review under CEOA(e.g., prepamtiorh O/O/1EIR)due to an appficable excepfionsuch os"unusiio/ circumstances'?
Summary of Facts
The project proposes construction of 54 three-story, townhome-style condominium units on an approximately 2.02-acre infill site located at 10130 Adella Avenue, The site is currently vacaiit but was previous(y used for industrial purposes and has a documented history of soil contamination. It is situated in an urbanized area of South Gate, immediately adjacent to Legacy High Schoot"s campus and near established residential neighborhoods, The site is xoned Industrial Flex (IF) within the Tweedy Boulevard Specific Plan's "Tweedy Education District," which allows medium-high density residential development in proximity to educattonal uses, The City's General Plan designates tlie area for residential and educational mixed use; the proposed density o( approximately 26.7 divelling units/acre is consistent witli the General Plan and Specific Plan standards. A portion of the units ivill be set aside as affordable housing under California's Density Bonus Lavi (which required a few minor development staridard viaivers).

49 Tlie project went through local planning reviews (Administrative Plan Reviewand DestBn Revievz), and on March 18, 2025, the Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 84531 for the subdivision. In conjunction with project approval, the City fited a Notice Of EXemption (NOE) asserfingthat the development qklalitiC'S far a ClaSS32 Categoricat exemption under CEQA Guidelines jlS332 (the infill development exemption). The City did not prepare an initial study or negative declaration; instead, it relied on the categorical exemption to conclude no further CEQA review was required.

Several specific aspects of the project and its setting are noteivorthy' * Hlgh School Proxlmity & Traffic Circulation: The project site borders Legacy High School, meaning there is substantial daily pedestrian traffic (students) and vehicle congestion during school drop-off and pick-up times in the immediate vicinity, Adella Avenue, which provides access to the project, is currently bifurcated by a "K-rail' concrete barrier near the school. This barrier was installed €O control traffic flow and enhance student safety by preventing cut-through traffic next to the campus, The approved project plans iiwolve replacing the fixed K-rail barner with an automated gate for emergency whicle access.

There !s community concern that opening tliis barrier (even if only during certain hours or for emergencies) could after local traffic pattems, potentially iritroducing new traffic through residentiai streets and around the school. The City recognized outstanding traffic and circulation issues - notably, it deferred a ful traffic circulation and pedestrian safety analysis until after project approval, as mernorialized in Conditlon of Approval 060 requiring a post-approval traffic study. That future sttidy is intended to evaluate student pedestrian safety, Sight lines, whicle circulation, and emergency aCCess design related €O the project. Until that study is completed, the precise trafflC management measures (and any needed mitigations} remain undetermined. * NoiseandAlrQuality:Theproject'sconstructtonaridoperationwillcontribute incrementally to noise and air emissions in the area. During operation, the primary noise and air quality impacts would stem from increased vehicle trips and residential activities.

The City's records indicate that a noise study was coriducted, concluding the project's noise levels would remain beloyi local sigriificance threshotds (and no substaritial evidence to tlie contrary was presented during approval). An air quality analysis or modeling was also performed, showing emissions below South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) significance thresholds. However, residents have voiccd concerns about increased traffic leading to higher noise levels and air pollution, especially given existing air quality burdens from nearby lraffic corridors and the sensitive receptor of the school, Specifically, if the Adella Avenue barrier is opened to regufar traffic, idling or cut-throuBh vehicles could introduce pollutants (particufate Page l of 14
50 50
matter, NOx,VOCs,etc,) mto a neiBhborhood that already experiencespot(ution from major roads. Neighbors have requested a more comprehensive air quality and health risk assessment to evaiuate these potential impacts.
* Soil Contamination and Health Risks: The project site's prior industriat use has left a legacy Of soil and pOSSibl7 groundwater contamination. Community members cite a documented history of soil contamination on the site and potenW for soHvapor intrusion (SVI) iisto nearby residences. The groundwater tabte in the area is shallow, which can exacerbate vapor intrusion concerns. Before constructtori, the project will require soil remediation and cleanup under regulatory oversiglit. Indeed, tlie City imposed conditions that construction permits will not be issued until clearance is obtained from the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFCQHaurdous Materials umt (ind!eating the Fire Department must approve the remediation of soil contaminants). During tlte Planning CommissionhearinB, residents raised health concerns about exposure to contaminants and dust durlng grading and remediation, They requested additional environmental site assessment (e,g. an updated Phase If inVeStigatiOn) and ongoing momtoring tO ensure Safety. Theme iSSueSremairi Onty parHally addressed at the time of the NOErilinB - detailed hazardousmaterials analysis and mitigation would normally be eva!uated in an environrnentat review, but were not fully expfored due to the categorical exemption reliance, In Summary, the City's pOSitiOn iS that the project fits within CEQA's infill exemption criteria and will not cause significant environmental effects. The community's position (as reflected in a drart appeal letter and technical comments) iSthat the project's traffic/pedestrian safety issues, proximity to a school, and contaminatton risks are unique and could ead to significant IMPACTS,suCh tilat the categorical exemption iS improper and a full EIR iSrequired. T1leSe factual points set the stage for the legal analysis below.

Legal Standards
Class 32 "lnfill Development" Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15332} Under CEQA, certain categories of projects presumed to have mininial envirogimental impact are eXenlpt frOnl further revieW# The ClaSS32 CategOriCal eXemptiOn (infill development projects) is defined in CEQA Guidelines §1S332. To qualify, a project must meet all five criteria specified In §15332(a)-(e):
* (a) Consistency with General Plan & Zoning: The project must be"consistent with the applicable general plan designation andoll applicable general plan policies as well os svith applicable zoning desigmtion and regulations.'

51 * (b) Occurs Within City Limits on Small Site: The project must occur "svithin city limits 07? o project site o/ no more tlian five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses," * (c}NoHab(tatValue:Thes! €ernust"havenovalueashabitatforendangered,rareor threatened species."
* (d) No Slgnificant Effects Related to Traffic, Noise, Air Quality, or Water Quality:
"Approval of the project would not result in ayhysignificarrt effects retating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.'
* (e) Utllitfes and Pubfic Services Available: "The site cart be adeqtmtety served by o// requiredutilities andpublicseMces."
If a project fails to satisfy any one or these conditions, the Class 32 exemption cannot be used and the project wotild require at least an illitial Study/negative dedaration 0r an EIR under CEOA, Even )r a project facially meets all five criteria, public agencies must also consider the exceptions in CEQA Guidelines §1S300,2, which can bar the use of categorical exemptions in specialcircumstances (BerkefeyHillside Preservadonv,City ofBerkeley (2015) 60 Cal,4th 1086), Unusual Circumstances Exception (CEQA Guidelines §l5300.21c)) CEQA Guidelines §15300,2(c) provides that a ategorical exemption cannot be used "where there fs a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a slgmficant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances." (8erkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley (2015) 60 Cal. 4th 1086) In other words, even if a project fits squarely within an exempt category, the exemption is inapplicable if unusual circumstances differentiate the project from the typical cfass of minor projects that are generally exempt, and those unusual features create a reasonable possibiltty of a significant environmental impact.

The California Supreme Court in BerkeleyHiflside Preservabonv,City o/ Berkeley(2015) 60 Cal.4th 1086 clarified tlie analytical approach for this exception. The Court established a twopart test: (1) determine whether an unustml circumstance is present (i.e., does the project have a feature or occur in a situation that distinguishes it from the ordinary circumstances of an infill project?); and (2} ir so, examinewhether there is a reasonabtepossibimy of o significom eiwironmentaj effect due to that uy>usual circumstance, The proponent of the exemption (liere, tlie City) bears the burden to show that tlie exception does not apply, Courts have emphasized the "low threshold" ror finding a siBnificant effect: it substaritial evidence in the record supports afair argument that the project may result in a significant impact due to the unusual circutnstance, the exemption must be disallowed. In Berkeley Hillside, t)ie Supreme Court noted that the usual deferential standard for agency decisions is modified in this context - a challenger need only show a fair argument of potential impact when unusual circumstances exist, rather than proving tlie impact will occur.

3L 52
Importantly, "unuscial" does not necessarily mean "e:xtreinely rare" - it means that the project has some characteristic that is not typical for projects in the exempt class and that cliaracteristic could resu/t in (7significant impact. For example,a project's location next to a sensitive resource or its inclusion of a hazardous activity might be considered umisual even if tlie project is otherwise art infill housing developnient. The Berkeley Hillside decision instructs tltat both prongs must be considered: there must be an unusual circumstance and a reasonable potential for a significant effect caused by it, ff botli are found, the agency cannot rely on the categorical exemption.

Other CEQA ExcepUons and Requirements
Other exceptions in §15300.2 include cumulative impacts (subd. (b}), scenic highiiiays (subd. (di), hazardouswaste sites (subd, (e)), and historical resources (subd, (f)). Thesemay apply regardless of umisual circumstances. Notably, !15300,2(e) precludes use of a categorical exemption if the project site is on a list of hazardous waste or contaminated sites compiled pursuant to Gov. Code §65962.5. In this case, if the 10130 Adella site is formally listed as a contamamated site {often called the Cortese List), the exemption would be prohibited. It is unclear from the record wlieO'ier tlie site is on scicli a list; however, the known soil contaminatton and required remediation suggest this exception needed careful consideration, Beyond the categorical exemption context, CEQA's Beneral mandate is tliat an EIRIs required if substantial evidence supports a"fair argument" that the project may have a significant envfronmental effect (Pub. Res.Code 521080(d)). This/air argument standard is applicable when determining the need for an EIR in lieu or a negat've declaration, and it parallels the standard used in the unusual circumstances exception analysis. Case law uitderlines that CEQA iS interpreted €0 afford the Mlest protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the Statutory language, Forinstance, PrOteCt NileS V, Ciff Of FremO?lt (2018) 25 CaiAppOSth 1129 reiterates CEQA'S fcindamental purpose Of informing decision-tnakers and the public of potentiaf environrnentai consequencesbefore proiect approval. Likewise,Communitiesfor o Better Etwironment v. S. Coast Air Quality Mgmt, Dist, (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310 and many other cases emphasize that CEQA's process of disclosure and analysis must occur at the earliest feasible stage, and that agencies may not evade tliis by segn'ienting or defemng review.

Finalllr, CEQAforbids deferring environmental arialysis or necessarymitigatton until after proiect approval when that deferral prevents informed decision-making. The leadinBcase Sundsrromv. Countyof Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296 held that an agency may not postpone studying an impact or formulating mitigation measures to a future time if tlie project may cause a significant effect; doing so can irwalidate a negative declaration or cxemptiori. A later case,KeepOur Mountains Quiet v. Countyof Santa Cfara(2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 714, eCtlOedttliSprinCiple, flndiflg that deferring a reqctiredStuCl70r mitigation meaSureVIOlateS Page S of 14
53 C[QA vihen there is no clear performance standard or enforceable guarantee that impacts viill be mitigated. These authorities guide the analYsis Of the City'S ACTIONS,especiallyregardingthe deferred traffic sludy in Condition #60.

In Stlmmary, the legal framework REQUIRESttlat the City demonstrate the project t'neets all Class 32 criteria and that no exceptions apply. If substantial evidence suggests the project may have significant effects (for example, on traffic safety, or from unusual site conditions like contamination), CEQA would mandate a higher level of review (typically an EIR) rather than a categorical exemption. With these standards hi mind, we turn to the spe<ific criteria attd exceptions as applied to the facts of this project.

Analysis
Applicability of Class 32 Exemption Criter!ori (d) to the Project Criterion (d) - No Significant Effects Related to Traffic, Noise, Air Quality, or Water Quallty:

This criterion is critical, as it is vihere the most serious qciestions arise. CEQA Guidelines §1S332(d)requiresthat the project svouldnot result in anysignificmsteffectsin tlie areasof trafflC, nOiSe, air qualitys Or Water qualitya The'City'S determination that the prOjeCt WOuld liave no significant impacts in these categories is challenged by substantial evidence and outstanding analyses. Each sub-issue is addressed in turn:
* Traffic and Pedestrian Safety: The project's traffic impacts are a central concern. As described, the site's only full access is via Adella Avenue in a locatton immediately next to Legacy High School. During peak school hours, this area experiences interise pedestrian activity (hundreds of students) and vehicle congestion. Introducing 54 new homes will generate additional daily traffic and trips during the morning and afternoon peaks, potentially exacerbating COflgeStiOn and treating new COllfliCt PAINTSbetWeen project-related vehicles arid school pedestrians. Neighbors fear cut-through traffic if the Adella barrier is opened, vihich could introduce schoot-related traffic into the residential street network.

The City did conduct a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for CEQA purposes (likely screening out the project as below VMT thresholds} and possibly a basic Level of Service review, finding the project did not exceed numeric traffic thresholds for significance despite thepresenceof a high schoolnearby. However, the City expresslydeferred a detaited traffic safety and circulation analysis until after project approval, via Condition #60. COnditiOn #60 REQUIRESthe developer tO prepare a full trafftC Study addressing Onsite circulation, sight distance at driveways, student pedestrian safety measures, and emergency access coordination with the school, in consultation with ttie public viorks and public safety departments, Tliis study is to be completed in the future, and any

'3\ 54
needed traffic control measures would presumably be implemented as conditioris of final occupancy.

Thisapproacli - approving the project asexempt before understandinB its site-specific traffic safety impacts - is problematic under CEQA, The lavi is clear that an agency cannot defer analysis of a potentially significant impact to a future date, In Sundstrom v. Countyof Mcndocino (1988), tlie court invalidated an approval wliere a hydrological study was required after project approval, holding that CEQA '4prohibits agencies from defemng analysis of potentially significant impacts until after project approval." The agencymust evaluate and discloseimpacts before making its decision, so that mitigation can be identified and the public and decision-makers are fully informed. Here, the deferred traffic study in Condition #60 suggests the City lacked sufficient evidence at the time of approvai to conclude there would be no significant traffic or safety effects, By postponing tlie analysis, the City effectively put off determining whether pedestrian safety impacts {for exampfe) might be significarit. CEQA case law (including Keep Our Mountains Quiet (2015)) emphasizes that deferring a study or mittgation is only permissible if the agency sets specific performance standards to ensure impacts wil be mitigated, ln this case, Condition #60 does not impose any clear performance standard (e.g "ensure project traffic does not cause queues extending to X street" or "achieve a certain level of serviceJ; it simply requires analysisand coordination. This means any at presenti
GiVen theSe faCtS, there iS a strong fair argument that the pro)ect mad have significant traffic-related effects, especially concerning traffic safety and circulation near the school, Potential impacts include increased risk or vehicle-pedestrian collisions, unsafe driveiizay sigm lines, congestion spilling onto arterial roads, or impaired emergency access if queues block the gated entry. The City's exemption finding under 115332(d) is on tenuous ground because it is not supported by substanfial evidence in the record as of approval - the crucial evidence is deferred. Protect Niles v. Cily ofFremont (2018) provides that substantial evidence of traffic problems can invalidate a mitigated negative declaration, and by extension, if such evidence exists, a categorical exemption would likewise be improper, In Protect Niles, the court found a fair argument of significant lraffic impact (in combination with aesthetic impacts) and ordered an EIR. Similarly here, testimony from residents and the imposition of Condition 60 itself constitute substantial evidence that non-trivial traffic safety iSsues exist. Thus, absent the completion of the traffic/pedestrian safety study, the City cannot guarantee that the project will have no significant traffl € effeCts. ThiS CallS intO quemon compliance With criterion (a).

35' 55
* Noise: Tfie tmeshold question is whetlier noise generated by the project (both construction and operation) could significantly impact nearby sensitive receptors.

Sensitive receptors in this context include the adjacent school and existing homes. The Clt'/'S nOISe analYsis concluded that the pro)ect'S operational nOlSe(e4- tram additional cars, residents, outdoor activity) would not exceed local noise ordinance standards or general plan noise compatibility Buidelines. The nevi residencesthemselvesare a compatible use next to a school and ollier homes. No contrary expert evidence was Submitted tO challenge the City'5 nOi5e Study. HOweVer, RESIDENTShaVe gerieral COnCernS that more traffic and activity could increase noise levels, and it remains unclear whether increased traffic would cause ambient noise to exceed the noise threshold. * Air Quality: The project's air emissions would come from construction acttvities (dust, equipment exhaust) and from additional vehicle traffic when occupied, According to the City, modeled emissions were below regional significance thresholds set by the air district. For a 54-unit housing project, it is reasonable that criteria pollutant emissions (ROG, NOx, PMIO, etc,) ivould not exceed thresholds that typically apply to much larger developments. However, the community"s concern is more localized: the cumulative air quality effect of adding traffic to an area already impacted by polkition, and the health risk to sensitive receptors (students and residents) from any increase in toxic air comamlnanls Or pa€tlcula!e matter.

One specific issue is the dust and emissions during soil remediation and construction.

Disturbing contaminated soil can release hazardous dust (e,g., containing volatile organic compounds or other toxics), Neighbors have understandably requested a detailed Air Quality & Health Risk Assessment to analyze this risk. The City's approach lias been to rely on standard conditions: they require that before grading, the developer obtain clearance from IACFD that remediation is properly completed, and during construction, dust control measures (watering, tarps, etc.) must be implemented per South Gate's standard conditions. While these measures provide some safeguards, the health risk to students (e.B., from diesel construction equipment or any vapor release)iiias not quantified in the exemption process. CEQA Guidelines 415064 and §1S126 (cited by residents) call for evaluating the intensity of health risks to nearby individuals, especially sensitive populations.

The key question for criterion (d) is whether air quallty or health impacts rise to a level of "significant effect," Based on regional thresholds, the City concluded they do not, and no numerical evidence to the contrary is in tfic record. Yet, if we consider the localized context (a polluted corridor and a schooli a fair argument could be made that even a moderate increase in emissions might be significant in this specific location. Moreover,

56 cumulative Impact concerns arise - C[QA's categorical exemption cannot be used if successive projects of the same type in the sameplace will liave o significant cumulative impact (Guidelines 415300,2(b)), The South Gate community points out that tlieir gielghborhood already endures poor air qciality; adding even a relatively small proiect coutd cumulatively contribute to a significant health risk witch viewed against that baseline. In Con'ununitiesfor a Bener Environment v.SCAQMD,the California Supreme Court stressed the importance of considering existing erivironmental conditions (the baseline) to determine impact significance (48 Cal.4th at 321-322). Here, the basellne near the 1-710 freeway and other pollution sources is already stressed.

In conclusion, while the City's quantitative air analysis supports a finding of no significant impact (thus seemingly satisfying criterion (d) for air quality), there remains qtmlitafive evidence of potential heart)i risk that was not fully explored. At minimum, this issue contributes to the "unusual circumstances" analysis (discussed below) since a housing project on a contaminated site next to a school is not a routine scenario for which the default emission thresholds might suffice to evaluate liealth impacts, * Water Quality: ThiS element ofcriterion (d) primarily concerns whether ttle project could cause significant water pollution or nmoff problems. Because tlie project will repiace largely pervious vacant land with impervious surfaces (roofs, pavement), stormwater runoff will increase. South Gate, like all municipalities in the region, requires developers to implement Low Impact Development (LID) features and best management practices (BMPs) to capture and treat stormxvater on-site. The project must adhere to a standard LEDPlan to manage runoff and prevent pollutants from feavingthe site. There are no streams or water bodies on or adjacent to the site, so the concern is mainly about urban runoff water quality. As long as the project includes required features (catch basins, bio-filtration planters, etc,), it is unlikely to violme any svater quality standard or svaste disdwge requirement, One potential issue could be if contaminated groundwater is encountered during construction de-watering, but tliat would be handled by remediation protocols under oversight (and again relates more to hazardous materials management than surface water quality).

3'7 57
establlshed at the time of project approval. This alone is a strong legal basis to invalidate the exemption,
Unusual Circumstances Exception (Guidelines *15300.2(c)} Even if one were to assume, arguendo, that the project meets all the Class 32 criteria above, tlie "unusual circumstances" exception in CEQA Guidelines 415300,2(c) must beconsidered. This exceptiori asks: is there something uiiusual about the project or its location, such that a significant environmental impact might occur, in spite of the exemption"s general applicability to infill projects? if yes, the exemption cannot be used.

Here, the record reveals multiple unusual circumstances that distinguish the 10130 Adella Project from the common infill project:
* Immediate Proximity to a High School (Sensitive Receptor}: The project borders a high school campus, whicli means it interfaces with 0 un/que/y sensitive population and tr4c s/ttmtfon. Most inFillresidentialprojectsare not siteddirectly adjacentto a school With 1,Ooo+ StUdentS. Tlle dail7 inriuX and eXOduS Of studentsOn feat and in VehiCleS creates an environmental setttng tliat Is not typical. Tliis proximity raises the stakes for traffic safety, air quality (children are more sensitive to pollution), and noise concerns during school events. Courts have considered proximity to sensitive receptors as a factor that Can COnStitute an ulluSLial CirCumStaflCe-essentiallyi tlle COnteXt Of tlle prOjeCt Can make its impacts more significant than they would be elsewhere. Here, tlie heavy student pedestrian traffic and concentration of young pedestrians immediately next to the project's sole access point is an unusual circumstance that efevates the risk of signific.ant traffic accidents or other impacts.
* UniqueTrafficBamer/EmergencyAccessCon%uration: Tlie presenceof the K-rail barrier and its proposed modification to an automated emergency gate is an atyplcal design feature. Most residential streets are not physically divided by barriers that must be managed or altered. Tlie need to coordinate an emergency-only access (versus potentially opening the road to general traffic) adds complexity to the project's design and operation, It also introduces uncenainty: if emergency responders or the school administration decide at some point to open the gate (for example, to alleviate congestion or for evacuation), the traffic pattern in tlie neighborliood would abrupNy change. This kind of contingent trarfiC circulation plan iS net a standard aspect Of infiil housing projects. It qualifies as att unusual circumstance because the project's impacts on circulation are highly dependent on a non-standard inrrastructuredecision (keeping a road closed except via a inovable barrier). The City's ovm acknoviledgrnent that it may

58 need to modify the emergency gate design in the future (as hinted in project conditions) underscores the unusual nature of this situatiori.
* Deferred Traffic/Pedestrian SafetyAnalysis: As discussed, the City approved the project with unresolved traffic safety questions, to be studied later (Condition #60). The very need for such a condition signals that significant impacts are reasonably possible - otherwise, the study would not be needed at all, CEQA case law (e,g., Sundstrom and Keep Our MOuntOinS Quiet'i TREATSthiS S€:enariO aSan indication that an impaCt COuld be significant. The incomplete analysis at approval Isunusual; ordinarillr, an infill project relying on an exemptton would have no glaring outstanding issues, Here, the incomplete circulation design and pending safety mitigations make the project unlike a typical srna)f devetopment. This unusual procedural circumstance (impact analysis deferred) is directly tied to potential significant effects, and thus fits sqiarely viithin 415300.2(c). A court would likely view the City's post-approval study requirement as a tacit admission that the project may have sigr>ificmit impoctsthat were not yet ruled out - preciselywhat the unusual circumstances exception Is meant to catch.
* Comarmnatton and Sofl Vapor Rlsk: The site's history of soil contamination and the need rOr remediation COfiStitute another unusual circumstance. While infill sites can often have soine level of contamination (coimnon in urban areas), the combination of factors here is concerning: a shallow groundwater table, proximity of homes (and the scliool) to the contamination, and the risk of vapor intrusion rriigrating off-site, This goes beyond the nortn far a VaCant 10t. The Department Of TOXiC SubStanCeS COntrOl (DTSC) has a specific program Tor school sites due to the heightened concern for children's exposure to toxics; the presence of such issues right next door to the high school and underneath residential yards is not a routine situation for a housing project. If, for example, benxerie or other volatile chemicals are in the soil, construction could refease thenl, Or they Could intrude intO buildings if net mitigated+ The CEOA Guidelines (e,g., §15126.2) require that knovm hazardous conditions be meaningfully invesOgated and addressed. The need for ongoing monitoring or a vapor barrier might arise, wliich are significant considerations. Iri short, the site's contamination and health risk profile is an unusual circumstance that could lead to significant effects (exposure of residents or studems to hazardous materials). ThiS factor lVaS explicitly highlighted by the cornmuriity as an unusual circumstance warranting an EIR,
it Cumulative Context - Already Stressed Environment: Though not an "unusial circumstance" in tl'ie strict definitional sense, it is wortl'i noting that the project is proposedin a community alreadyfacmgenvironmental burdens(air pollution, traffici This raises the possibility of cumulative impacts that might not occur in less impacted

3'i 59
areas. CEQA"s categorical e:xemption exceptions include cases where "successive projects of the same type in the same place over tin'ie" would have a significant cumulative effect. Here, the project by itself might be considered sma!1, but South Gate residents point tO ongoing development and heavy traffic in their area such that the incremental impact of this project could be cumulatively considerable. While tliis is formally a separate exception (§15300,2(b)), it aligns with the spirit of unusual circumstances: the environmental context is out of the ordinary (in that it's akeady saturated with impacts).

This fUrther cautions against using a categorical exemptton without analysis.

Given these unusual circumstances, the second step is to ask whether there is a reasonable possibility of a significant effect due to them. The answer appears to be yg Each "unusual" factor identified is causalJy linked to one or more potential significant impacts:
h High school adjacency -> potential for significant traffic safety impacts (pedestrian collisions) and health risk impacts (air quality) affecting sensitive receptors. * K-rail emergency ga(e design -> potential for slgnlflcant traffic circulation impacts if mismanaged (e.g,, causing cut-tlirough traffic or inipeding emergency response). * Deferred ana(ysis '> indicates potential significant !mpacts Were not ruled out (safety, traffic) and could materialize if study finds problems. * Contamination -> potential for significant hazardous material exposure (a significant impact on human health and water/soil quaity if not properly mitigated}.

Under the Berkeley HillSide tent, One need Onl7 Shall/ that these circumstances make it reasonably possible that a significant impact may occur. There is substantial evidence in the record for such a fair argument: community members, including tlie school community, have submitted comments attesting to traffic dangers and health concerns; the City's own conditions acknowledge potential issues, This satisfies the tow threshold needed to invoke the exception.

For example, if a lawsuit were filed, a court coutd find that having a school next door and a tobe-determiried traffic plan is an unusual situation, and given evidence of heavy pedestrian use, one canfairly argue the project may causea traffic accident or endanger pedestrians - a significant impact on public safety. Under CEQA, public safety effects (like traffic hazards} are environmental impacts (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G includes transportation safety as a criterion). Similarly, a resident's testimony about lingering contamination odors or health worries, combined with known data about site contamination, can support a fair argument of potentially significant liealth risk - wl'iich is an environmental effect (haxards to people, per Appendix G).

40 60
In Berkele'>' HlllSide, the CaliforniaSupreineCourtnoted that if there Isanysubstantialevidence of a potential significant effect due tO ui'iusual aSpeCtS of the project, the exemption must be set aside, Here, siie have multiple such strands of evidence. Thus, the unusual circumstances exception in *15300.2(c} likely applies,meaningthe City shouldnot rely on the Class32 exemption. instead, the City would need tO prepare at least an initial study and likely an EIR to fully examine these issues.

It is worth reinforcing that CEQA is interpreted in favor of environmental review vihen reasonable doubts exist, "When there is substantial evidence of a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect, an EIR is required', even if the agency believes impacts can be mitigated, In this case, the combination of site-specific factors constitutes more than a reasonable possibility - it suggests real potential for significant impacts unless properly mitigated through the EIR process, An EIR would provide the vehicle to develop and mandate such mitigation (for exampe, traffic signals, crosswalk improvements, vapor barriers, or relocation of certain access points) in a way that a categorical exemption cannot, Condusion
In conclusioni the City Of Sat)th Gate'S determination that the 10130 Adella Avenue prOjOCt iS cateBoricallyexemptunder CEQAClass32 is legallyand factually vulnerable. While the project does meet several elements of tlie infill exemption (appropriate location, density, urban context, and available services), it fails to convincingly satisfy the requirement that it have no significant effects related to traffic, etc. due to the outstanding traffic safety issues. Moreover, the presence of unusual circumstances - particularly the adjacency to Legacy High School, the atypical traffic circulation constraints, and the site's contamination - provides substantial evidence of a fair argument that significant environmental effects could occur. Under CEQA Guidefines §1S300.2(c) and perttnent case law, these factors preclude the use of a categorical exemption.

By deferring the traffic/pedestrian study and glossing over cotitamination concerns, the City did not fulfill CEQA'srequirement of conductinga full, good-faith environmentalevaluationbefore project approval, As a result, the exemption finding is not supported by substantial evidence.

Courts have consistently held that CEQA exemptions are to be narrowly construed, and agC'nCiC'SnluSt StriCtl7 a(lllere 10 the COnditiOnS far their use. Here, thOSe COnditiOnS Were net met in ful(. If challenged, a court would likely invalidate the NOE and require the preparation of an appropriate CEQA document (likeiy' an [IR) tO address traffiC Safety, air quality/heaith RISKS, noise, and water quality impacts, as well as to develop any necessary mitigation measures.

Far the pcirpOSC"SOf al1 administrative appeal, the abOVe analYsis S(lppOrtS the argtin'ientthat the City should withdraw the Class 32 exemption and undertake a proper CEQA review. The

61 proiect's benefits and intill nature do not excusecompliancewith CEQA'smandateto disdose and' mitjgate environmental harms, At minimum, an initial study leading to a mitigated negative dectarati'on wouid be the next step - but given the fair argumerit standard and community evidence, an EIR is the Iegaily prudent path, This ivill ensure tliat issues like student pedestrian Safety, t/affiC circulattori deSigll, and Sail refllediation are thorouglily studied and addressed in the project's plans.

Ultimately, the intent of CE(JA IS riot to stop development, but to ensure that decision-makers and the public are fully informed and that feasible. tt'teasures to protect the cornmuriity's health and safety are implemented. In this case, treating th.e project as exernp( short-circuited that process, Therefore, to uphold the letter arid spirit of CEQA, the City's reliance on the C(ass 32 categoricai exemption should be re-examined and likeiy overturned, The evidence indicates that this project maytmvesignificant environmentoleffectsand occursunder unusuai circtrmstances, mandati.nga hiBlierlevel of environmentalreviewprior tO ariyfcirther project approvals or construction.

Reoommeom Th*aty(mndl, on appeal shoukldkmttmt agiElRbepspmd Thrtbe lOt30Adak Amueprojectormleastmqu €readatabdlnltlalstudy,b*eam*th*aass3z emptkin ftmlngsaimotwtthstand sevtjny. Thlsmrs*ofadon allgnswlth CEOA's rqu#remems andwill ultlmatdy fed 5a safer,emdronmentdysound pmJthroudi proper mlton oftmMemffledeona.rns.Th*heatth andsaof r*dd*ntsand studentsi aswell as the Inkagrltyoftheaty'splarinkigpreass,depend on McarefuloomplmnoawltbC. hparedbykgda>unsel%Soudh aouf%gms%rtmrs,
NkhotasL nmko, J:s4.

Offke ofNkMas L D'Amffico
lmktob

LIZ.. 62
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to you as a concemed member of our community regarding the tragic incident involving the death of a child due to drag racing in our neighborhood that took peacemany years back This event had a profound impact on al) of us arid l'iighiighted the urgent need ior safety measures in our area.

It was my understaridiiqgthat the K-rail currently in p!ace o@delta was iristatled in direct response to this devastating incident. It serves as El cruciat barrier to prevent reck[ess behaviors, such as drag racing, arid to ensure the safety of our families, especially chifdren who are always playing in our neighborhood.

As discussions arise about replacing the K-raii or potential!y operiing it durii'ig certain times, I implore our community and local authorities to reconsider the irripiications of such changes. The K-rail is vitat for maintaining a secure environment. arid its presence has helped reduce the risks we face.
l believe that we must prioritize the safety of our neighborhood to prevent ariy further tragedies. Thank you for takirig this matter serioustyand considering our collective rieed for security and protection.

Sincerely,
/'s'- [ %
" " ao8t-[-; ffl,5:::,[j,?,iEz\,% ,,':";D
63 OPOSICI(5NALPROYF,CTO ioi:io,x'nyi.a,h
y0 %ro (,srvb-<x(6ai meopongoalProyecto10130Ade)la
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para opoxierine y las sokicitudes corrcspoi'idientes para con,siderar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruelias Ambientaies Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarro)ladot realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta eva!uaci6n debe evaJuar todos }os posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo ta ca)idad del aire, la contarninaci6n acustica y los impactos en el irAfico, Creo que el proyecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo Ia Exenci6n Categ6rica de ta CEQA, seg'anlasecci6n 15332 (CJase 32 - Proyectos de Desarroklo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la cajidad del agua, De no set asi, mc gustaria recibir el infot'tne cornpleto que lo demuestre,

2. Transparencia sobre Proly]emas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados mbre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con cl s.itio del proyccto y c6mo SO abordari'i. Especfficainente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se rcalizaran, cuAles sustaiicias son preoctpantes y c6mo )as medidas de linipieza asegttrar6n la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrmea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionaies reatizadas despu6s del 1 7708/2021.

3. Monitoreo Anbiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimienlo de un plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de consttvcci6n y operaci6n. Este pkan debe detallar c6mo se realizat" cl monitoreo dc vapor de suelo despu6s de ia cons(rucci6n e incluii planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de 'vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de periniso de cotstrucci6n. Proteger la m'ud de log niflos, laa poblaciones vulnerables y todos Los miembros de la comunidad es de mAxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Tonia de Deeisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que inc}uya a residentes, expeitos en medio arnbientc y funcionarios da la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos arnbientales del proyecto. Esto garantizar6 la rendici6n de cuentas y lyrindmt a )os residentes una voz en cl monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto, 5, La barrera (K Raid) de Adella Ave. permaneeerA en su lugaia:
o Urjo encarecidantente a la ciudad a mautener el K rail cerrado a todo trafico.

Le'vantar la barrera de) K probablemente conducirA a un aurnento en las emisiones de velifcutos, degradaiido aun inks Ja calidad dei airc. Solicito rina evaluaci6n integral da la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos en la salud de lIoossreerseicdteonstedse.lAaderne:o,aebnogeot EouJroredaelizuardrpl%uOeybaspordeunnivme xiivelesde contarninaci6ndel aire >i del ruido si se levantala bat'rera. Es esencial involucraia a expertos en salud y.medio ambicntc para analizar estos itnpactos, Confio en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

FIW,;rtc,('i,,mal Fecha
64 OPOSICION AL 'PROYECTO $0130 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales F,xhaustivas:
0 Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Irnpacto Ambiental (HIA) exliaustiva aiites de que se implemente cualquier uiiidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n dcbe evaluar todos los posibles efectos arnbientales, incluyendo !a calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y IOSimpactos en el trAfico. Crco que el proyecto no deberfa calificar cotno exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6:tica de la CHQA,segtxntasecci6n 15332(Clase32-l)royectosdeDesarrollo)I,aaprobaci6n del proyectopodrfatener efectos significativos en el trThco, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua, De no ser asf, me gustaria recibir ef informe completo que fo detnuestre,

2. Transparencia sobre Problentas de Contaminaci6n:
0 B'usco informes detallados sobre problemas de comamitiaci6n anteriores asociados con el ,gitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especfficamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, cu&s sustaiicias soti preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegirarAn la seguridad dei suelo y del agua subtcrriea, Dado que el Geo 'J'racker no mucstra pniebas adicionales reatizadas despu6s del I 7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
c Pro,pongoel establecirnientode un lilari para eJmonitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Estc plan debe detallar c6mo se tealizara el monitorco dc vapor de suelo des.pu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapoz durante las ptuebas en la etapa de permiso de constnicci6n. Proteger la salud dc los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerablcs y todos Jos miembros de ia conutnidad as de mAxirna iinportancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio atnbientc y funcionarios de (tt ciudad para supervisar 10S agpectos atnbien(ales del proyecto. Esto garantizara la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a ios residentes una voz exi el monitoreo de log impactos del proyecto. 5, La barrera (K Raid) de Adella -Ave. perinanecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo cncarccidatncnte a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cem'tdo a todo ttAfico.

Levantar la bairera del K probablemente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradando mis la ca}idad de] aire, Soiicito ina evaluaci6n integral de Ja calidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos en la salud de los residentes.AdemAs,abogoporrealizarl:iruebas dc nivelcs deruido pata eva}uar los efcctos del aumento en el flujo de trAko y por tn monitoreo continuo de 108 niveles de contaniinaci6n det aire y del mido si se Ievanta la bmrera. ES esencial invofucrar a expertos en saJud y incdio anibientc para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en que darAn a estas preocupaciones ia atenci6n que tnerecen. 1,410r%la' ,,>T2!" '34 € -2r
Fecha
65 OPPOSTTION TO 10130 ADELLA PRO.TECT
I 4Jr;ev (*ru-x;v2> am opposing the 10130 Adel}a Project (the 'iProject") Below, 1 have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requeslsto consider chmiging my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
0 l request that the developer COllduCt a thorough Envtronlnental Impart ASsesSlnent (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. l believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Deveiopmental Projects), Approval of the projecl may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quiity. If this is not true, l wouJd }ilce to receive the coinpreliensive report that proves the above untie.

2. 'l'ransparency on Contamination Issues:
0 ( seek detaited repotts on past contamination iSSues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. SpecificalJy, l would kike to know what tests will be conducted, whicli substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not s}iow Atrther testing done after 8/17/'2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose tlie establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational plxases. This plan shoukl outline how soil vapormonitoring Will be conducted post-construction and iiclude contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing a( the building permit stage.

Protectiitg the lica!tit of children, vulnerali!e populations, and al} con'imunity members is ofutmost impoita:nce.

4. Aecountability in Decision-Making:
o I request the establisl'unent of a community advisory bogd that includes residenU, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of tlie project. This will ensure aa;'ouiitability and provide residents with a 'voice in monitoring the pm,iect's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Ratl) to remain in place:
o I stongly tirge the city to keep tlie K rail closed to ail ttaffic. Removing the K barrier wiil likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality, Irequesi a comprehensive air quality assessrnerit to understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise Jevel testing to evaluate the effec'ts of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Bngaging health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

Itrust tliatyou wifl give these concerns the attention they deserve, Signature
e>5}2,(,[35'
Da(e:

Ltg
66 OPOSIC}ON AL PROYE(:'TO 10130 ,tl)Ii,LLA
Yo lb'hA?E /(:? (.:M3!eEl;zrh meopongoalProyecto 10130Adella (el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis raz,ones para oponerme y las solicitudes corrcspondientes para considcrar caxnbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pnebas Ambientides Exhaust:ivas:
o Solicito que el desairollador reaIice una E;vatuaci6n de Iinpacto Ambiental (EIA) exliaustiva aittes de que se implemente cualquier unidad ayitomatizada. Esta evaluaci6ri debe eva}uar todos Jos posibles efectos ainbientales, incluyendo ta calidad del aire, )a coi'itaininaci6m acustica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberia calil'icar como exento bajo ta Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, seganla secci6n 15332 (Ciase 32 - Proyectosdef)esarrollo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podria tencr efectos significativos en el tr6fico, el ruic!o, la ca}idad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asi, me gustarfa recibir el informe completo que to demuestre.

2. Transpareneia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detal!ados sobre problemas de cotitaminaci6n aiiteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Bspecifican"iente, me gtstaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizazaii, cu.41es sustancias son preocupaiites y c6mo kas medidas de lin'ipieza asegirarii la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterranea. Dado quc el Geo Tracker no muestrap'tuebas adicionales realizadas despu6s de) 17/08/2021

3. Monitoreo Ambicntal Continuo:
o Propotigo et establecimien'lo de un plait para el monitoreo ainbienta! coxitinuo duraiite las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n- E,ste plan debe detallar c6mo se reatizara el monitoreo de vapor de sue!o despu6s de la constnicci6ri e iiicluir planes de coiilingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor <turante Ias pntebas en la etapa de permim de construcci6n. l)roteger la salud <ie lag nii'ios, las poblaciones vulnerables y (odos los nnieinbros de la comunidad as de m;axima importancia,

4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Soiicito cl estabJecitniento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio axiibien(e y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar tos aspectos ambientales dej proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA B 10Sresidentes una VO7: en cl moiiitoreo de 10S impactos del pro)iecto. 5, i,a barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave, permanecerA en su Iugar:
o Urjo encarecidarnente a la ciudad a manteiier el K rail cerrado a lodo trAfico, Levantarla barreradel K lirobablementeconducirAa un aumentoenlas en"iisiones de vchiculos, degradando aGn rmts la calidad (let aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad clef aire para c,omprcncler los posib1es impactos e'n ia salud de ios residentes. AdernAs, abogo por realizar pniebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar tos efectosdel autnentoen el t!iiio detrAfico y por un monitoreocoutinuo de los niveles de contarnixiaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levai'xta la barrera. Es escncial involucrar a expertos en saltid y medio amliiente para analizar estos impactos.

COIIIIO en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la ateiici6n que merecen.

Firma rieDJ""/">"
L!t'l
67 OPOSICf('N AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, !ie expuesto mis razones para oponerine y las solicitudes correspondiemes para considerar cai'nbiar mi oposici6n:

L Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desanouador realicc tma F,valuaci6n de Impacto Ainbiental (EIA) exhaustiva aiites de que se imp)emente cualqriier tmidad automatizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe eya!uar U'idos los posibles efectos tunbientales, inchiyendo la calidad dcl aire, la contaminaci6n ac€tstica y los impactos en cl trAlaico.Creo que cl proyecto no deberfa ca!if7car como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segi'u'i iasecci6i'il5332 (Ciase 32 - Proyectos cte Desarro!lo). La aprobaci6n de)liroyecto podriatenerefectossignificativosenel trbfiw, elruido,laca!idaddel aire o ta caiidad del agua. De no ser asi, me gustarfa recibir el ix'tfoime comp}eto que }o demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco infori:nes detallados sobre problemas de containinaci6n aiitei'iores asociados con eelsitio deI proyecto y c6mo se abordaran. Espectficameme, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizar&"i, cuAles sustaiicias 8011 preocupm'ites y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo V clel agua subterrAnea, Dado quc e} Geo l'racker no muestra pruebas adiciona!es reaJizatias despu6s del 17/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo AmLyienta} Continuo;
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plait pataa cl monitoreo ambiental continuo durai'ite las 'fases de constru.cci6n y operaci6n. E,ste )ilaii debe detallar c6mo se reali,zarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incIuir p!anes de contirigencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en )a etapa de periniso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los nii"ios, las poblaciones yutnerables y iodos los mieinbros <lela comunidad es de mAxin'ia importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el estal'>lecin'iierito de un conscjo asesor comtinitario que incluya a residentes, e.xpeitos en medio ai'nbiente y fyincionarios de la citidad pora supervisar los aspectos ainbientales del proyecto. Hsto garantizar €t la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes iina voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto, 5, La barrera (K Rail) de Adellsi Ave. perinnnecerA en su Iugar:
0 Uijo encarecidaniente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a tc'ido trfflco. Levantar }a barrera del K probaliletnente conducir6 a un aui'riento en ias en"iisiories de veliiculos, dc,7raclai':ido aun mis la ca!idaddcl aire. Solicito una eva)uaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprendcr los posibies impactos en Ja sahtd de tos residentes. Ademas, abogo por realizar pruebas cle niveles de ruido para evaluar Ios efectos clel tuiniento en el flujo tie trAfico y poi: cm moi'iitorco continuo de 108 niveles tle contatniuaci6n det aire y dcJ ruiclo si se le'vanta 2a barrera. Es csencial invo!ucrar a exper(os en salud y medio ambiente para analizar estos in'ipactos, Conflo en que darffin a estas preocupaciones la atcnci6n que inerecen.

FecllaD:\'lpo,;l-r
68 P!c)tC")ilA!,a:&'e!!Odmyreasonsforopposing(paipid@:x'rgre changing my opposition:

1. ComprehensiveEnviiaonnientaiTesting;
o l reqiiest that the developer conduct a thomugh EnvironrnentaJ Impact Assessment (EIA) before die Project is approved. This assessment shotild evaluateall potential en'vironrnental effects, including air quality, noise pa)lution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt iinder CBQACutegorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approvat of tbe project may gsult in significant ef!'ects re(ating to traffic, xioise, air qmlity, or water quality. If this is not true, I wotild like to receive tlxe comprehensive report tiiat proves the above untnie.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
0 1 Seek detailed iepOrtS Otl paSt Cal)taminatlOfl
md
ig81le3aSSOCiated With the pTOjeCt Site how these wil} be addressed, Specifically, I wocild like to 1<now what tests will 'be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. AS t?ie Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/27/202?, 3, Ongobig Enviroxunental Monitoring:
o 'f l'irop<ise the estabiislxment off a plan for ongoing environmenta} monitoring throughout the construction arid operational phases, Tliis plan sliou!d outline how soi) vapor monitoring wil] be conducted post-constnictiori and include contiiigency plaxm if vapor issues are detected duririg testing at the building permit stage. T)rotecting the health of children, vulrierable populations, axid all eornrnunity tucmbers is of utinost miportance,

4. Accountability in Decision-Mmking:
.
o Irequesttheestablisltmentofacoiximuriityadvtsoxyboardthatinclidesresidents, environmental experts, arid city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This wil} ensure accountability and provide residents witl'i a voice in nionitoring the project's impacts,

5. Adella Asie. Coneyete Barrier (K Rail) to remain jn peace:
o
bariier
I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to al] tratTic, Removing the K will hkety lead ro incwased veliicle ernjssions, fiirther degrading air quality. I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential I'xealtb impactq on residents. Addit'ionally,Iadvocate fornoise le'vel testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing rnoiiitoring of air and noise pollutioit Jevels if (he bat'i4er is removed. Engagi.iig healtli ai'xd enviroxm'iental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

Itifth4,youwillgivetheseconcerns theattention tlieydeserve. //7'7e s[z'y'l'zs
Date:
!'l 69
O}FOSITIOr( .x010130ADELLAPROJECT
Project")Below, I haveoutlinedmy reasonsfor opposingandcorrespondingrequeststo consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmentai Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeiveloperconductathoroughEnviroentallmpactAssessment (ETA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmenta} effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and taffic impacts, I believethat theproject shouidnot bequalified asexempt inderCEQA Cate@orica} Exemption under seiion 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta! Projects), Approval of the project inay result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not trcie, I would like to receive tlie comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.

2. Transpanncy on Contamination Issues:
o f seek detailed reports on past contan'iiiiatioxi issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specificallyj would like to Icnow what tests wil! be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will eiisure soi} and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021,

3. Ongoing Envtronmental Monitoring:
o 1 propose the establishmentof a plan for oitgoin(3 environmental monitoring throughout the constuction and operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wril} be coiiducted post-constuction and include contingency plans if vapor iSSueS are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting tlie health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost impoitance

4. Aceountability in Decision-Making:
o Irquesttheestablishmentofacommunityadvisoxylyoardtbatincludesresidents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. Tl'iis wilJ ensire accountability and provide residerits with a voice in monitorii'ig the project's impacts,

5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBa rrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to ali traffic. Removing the K barrier will }iicely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quatity. l request a comprehensi've air quality assessment to understand the potential healtli impacts on residents. Additionaily, I adyocate for noise level testirig to evajuate the effects of increased traffic flow and for oxigoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed, Erigaging health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

I lrust that you will give these concerns the attention they deserve. r[? Ce)
Signature 7t,;'i?g-q 3/zy/z'r
Date
50 70
OPPOSITION TO 10230 ADELLA PROJECT
t3-ess(.3,g,()(azAarnopposingtheiox:goaaenapro3ect(the
"Project>')Below,IhaveoutlinedmyreasonsforopposingandcoirespondiitB requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o
l request thatthedeveloper conduct a thorough Environmenta} Impact Assessment (EIA)before the Project is approved, TJffs assessment should evacuateait potential envirorimental effects, including air quality, noise ponutian, ai'id traffic impacts, l believethattheprojectshould not be qrialified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under sedion I5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of theproject may restilt in significant effects rclating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If tliis is not true, l would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue,

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site andhow thesew'Ul be addressed. Specificaily, l would like to know what tests will be conducted, whicli substances aiw of concern, and how clean-up measures witl ensure mil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show fuither testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout tl'ie constmction and operational phases. an'iis plait should outline how soil vapor inonitoring will be conducted post-constuction and inc)tide contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building pertnit fflage, Protecting the health of cliildren, vulnerable populations, and all community members is ofutmost importance,

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o Erequest the establishment of a comn"iunity advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials lo oversee the environmental aspects of the project. Tl'iis will ensure accountability and provide residents witb a voice in monitoring the project's impacts,

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in peace:
o k strongly urge the city to keep the K rail ciosed to all tmffic. Renioviiig the K l'iaxrier will likely lead to increased vehicle einissions, further degrading air quality, I reqriest a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand tlte potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air mid noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential
I trustthat you wall give these concerns the attentioxi they deserve, ],=--l,-,- 3 2 "'i ';'isDate:
71 OPOSICION AL PROYE(.:'TO 10130 ADELLA
Yo tS2a %"-'- meopongoatProyecto tO]30Adel}a (cl "Proyecto>'). A conlinuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Atnbientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice tna Evaluaci6n de [mpacto Ambiental (HIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. I?sta evaluaci6n debc evaluar todos 108 posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la containinaci6n actistica y los impactos en el ttrhfico. Creo que el proyecto i'xo deberia calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtm ka secci6n !5332 (Clase 32 - Pro)iectos de Desarrollo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podxia tener efec(os significatiyos en elttAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no set asi me gustarfa i:ecibir el informe completo que lo deniuestre.

2. Transparenciii sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6ri:
o Busco inforn'ies detalNados sobre problcmas de contaniinaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificamente, me gustarfa saber qri6 pruebas se realizar.i, curies sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas Geo
delimpiezaasegurari'ila seguridaddel sueloy del agia subterranea.Dadoclue e) Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/202], 3, Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propoi'igo el establecimiento de un plan para el inonjtoreo ainbientai continuo durante !as fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Rste p}ail debe detallar c6mo se iaea!izara el monitoreo de vapor <lesuelo despu6s de la construcci6ii e incluir p!anes de contirigencia si 86 detectaxx problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de constrcicci6n. Proteger la salud de 108 nifios, las poblaciones vulnerab]es y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de maxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la 'l'oma de Deeisiones:
0 Solicito el establecimiento de trill consejo asesor comtuaiitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y funciortarios de l1l ciudad para supervisar los aspeclos ambientales dcl proyecto. Estci gar<'intizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindatA a los residenles una voz, en cl nionitoreo de los impaceos de) proyecto.

S. La barrera (K Riiil) de Adclla Ave. permanecer6 en su lugar:
o Urjo encarccidamente a la ciyidad a mm'itener el K rail cerrado a todo t'rAfico. Levantar Ja barrera del K probablementc conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradtuido aun mis Ja calidad del aire. Solicito una eva.luaci6n tntegral de la calidad del aire pitra cornprender fos posibles impactos en la salud de los residentes. Ademb, abogo por realizarpruebas de niveles de ruido para cv<auar los efectos del aumento eii el flujo de trAfico y por cin monitoreo continuo de los iiiveles de containinaci6n dei aire y del ruido si se levanta }a barrera, F,s esencial involucrar a experlos eii salud y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos, Coi'ifio en que daran a esta.s preocupaciones la atenci6n que nierecen. /
Firma ?ecl'ia
,,;!la'l%b
5"2, 72
chaxiging my opposition:

1. Comprehensive H,nvironmental Testing:
o I request tltat tbe developcr conduct a thorough Enviromnental Impact Assessment (BIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment slxould evaluate all potentiai environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. l bejieVe that the prOjeCt 3hOuid net be qualified aSeXernpt ui'itler CEQA CategOriCal Exemption under section 15332 (CJass 32-Developmental Prqiects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating 'io traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. ff this is .itot true, 1 WOIII(l like to receive the comprel'iensive report that proves the above hintrue.
2, l'ransparency on Contamination Issties:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site ai'id liow these wifl be addressed. Specifically, l would like to kllOW what tests will be conducted, wl'iicl'i substaiices are of concern, and IIOW clean-up measmes will ensure soi} <tnd groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sliow furtlter testing done after 8/17/2021,

3. Ongoing Environrncntal Monitoring:
0 I propose the establislunent of a plai'i for <:ingoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases. T'his plait should ocit}ine liow soil vapor monitoiii'ig will be conducted post-construction and include contingency p}arts if vapor issues are detected during testiiig at tlie building permit stage. l)rot.ecting the health of children, vu)neraL>le pol:iulations, and all comniunity members is of utmost importance.

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o I request the establishment of a community advisory board that inchides residents, environmental experts, and city officiafs to oversee tlie environmental aspects of the pro,iect. Tliis will ensure accountabitity anct proyide residents witlx s voice in monitoring the lirojcct's impacts,

5. Adelia Ave. Coticrete Barrier (K Riiil) to remain in place:
o } strongJy urge the city to keep tl'ie K rail closed to alt ti:affic. Ren'ioyixig tlie K barrier will lilccly lead to increased vehicle enffssions, further degrading air quality, Krequest a comprehensive ttir quality assessment.to unclerstand tlie potential health impacts on residerzts. Additionally, l advocate for noise level testing to evajuate tlie effects of increased t'im'fic.flow and for origoing monito'iing of air and noise po levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environment<ct yze. these impacts is essentia],
Itrust that y concex'ns the attention they <leserve,
Signaturc Date:
73 OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJF,CT
r "r rY7Ct)v4m.i q-ei4, ,amopposingthe10130AdellaProject(the changing my opposition:

Comprehensive Environmental '.i'esting:
o I request that tI'ie developer conduct a thorougli EnvironrnentaJ Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment shou)d evaluate all potential environrnenta] effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. :[ belieye tliat ffie project sliould not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categoricat I":xemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approva} of tlie project may result in significant effects relating to tragic, noise, air quality, or water quality. lf tliis is not true, I would iike to receive the comprehensive repori tIiat proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency oii Contamination '[ssuegi
o l seek detailed reports 011past containination issues associated with tlie project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how cleai'i-up measures will ensure soi} aitd groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done afater8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Enviroximental Monjtoring:
c 5 propose the establishi'i'ieiit of a plai'i for ongoing environmenta1 moi'iitoring throughout the constrtxction and operational phases. Tliis plait should outline how soil vapor inonitoring will be conducted post-coraistruction and include contingency plans if vapor ISSUESare detected during testing at the 'building perxnit stage, Protecting the health of childreii, vulnerable populations, mid all community inenilyers is of utinost importance.

4. Accountability,in 'l)ecision-Making:
o } request tlie establislimcnt or a comnanmity adyisory board tbut includes residents, environmentaJ experts, and city of'ficials to oversee tlie enviroru'nental aspects of' the project. This will ensure accountabili(:y and provide residents wit]i a voice in monitoring lhe projectas in"ipacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Bnrrier (K Rail) (o remaixi in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep tlie K rai! closed to all traffic. Removing tlie K barrier witl likely lead to increased ve]"iicle emissions, further degrading air quali(y.

I request a compreliensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health iinpacts on residents, Additionally,rad'vocatc for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air anc'l noise po}hition levels if the barrier is .remo'ved. L'ngaging health and environmental experts to analyze 'these impacts is essential.
aitaOa:,1)"7M7
(> 4D33y'ls25
r-'-
74 OPOSiCION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expriesto mis razories para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondie'i'ites para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

I. Pruebas Ambientales Exliaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador rea!ice una E'valuaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (E}A) exhaustiva antcs de que se irnplen'iente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaJuar todos los posibles efectos ambicntales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6ix acustica y )OS impactos en el trafico. Creo que el proyecto no deberta calificar como exenlo bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtin la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - I)royectos de Desarrollo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener etectos significativos ei"i el trAflco, el ruido, }a calidad del aire o la calidad del' agua. De no ser asi, me gustarfa recibir cl informe cornplcto que lo demuestre.

2. TrarisparenciasolireProblemasdeContaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detatlados sobre problernas de contaminaci6n antcriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordaran. Especi&.an'tcnte, me gustar{a saber qu6 pruebas se realizarii, cufves sustancias son preocupantes )i c6mo las medidas de }i'inpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y de) agua subteraAnea, Dado que et GeoTrackcr no muestraliruebas adicionaiesrealizadasdespu6sdel 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo AmbientaJ Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de iin plan para el rnoniloreo ambiental contii'iuo d'iuaame Ias fases de CONS,trucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe dctallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor dc sue(o despu6s de la construcci6n e inchtir planes de contingencia si se dctectaix prob)emas de vapor durante Jas piebas an la etapa de perrniso de construcci6n, Protegcr ta salucl de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerali.!es y todos los iriiembros da ta comunidad es da tnaxima impocia.

4. Responsabiiidad en ta l'oma de Decisiones:
0 Solicito el estabJecimiento de un coiisejo ascsor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ainbicnte y funcionarios de la ciudgt para supervisat los aspectos an'ibientales del proyecio. F,sto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindai a tosresidentes una Vo7, en el monitoreo de tos impactos del proyecto. 5, La liarrera (K Rail) de Adelht Aye. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo cncarecidan"iente a la ciudad a maxitener el K rail cerrado a todo trffico.

Levantar la lyarrera del K probablemente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradando aun mAs la calidad del aire. Solicito una evakuaci6n integral c?cla calidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos en la saluci de los residentes. AdemAs, abogo por realizar ptuebas de niveles de ruido para evaiuar los efectosdel aurnentoen el flujo de trAtico >rpor un monitoreo continuo de los nivelesde contarninaci6ncfelaire >rdel ruido si se levanta)al>arrera, E,sesencial invo)ucrar a expertos en salud y medio ainbiente para aiializar estos impactos, Contio an que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que t'nerecen. p!.cca" R3t"";p"(
75 opos:icx6n AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto"), A continuaci6n, Iie expueslo mis razones para opone'rme y !as solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar rni oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientaies Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desanollador realice una Eva2uaci6n dc hnpacto Ambiental (EJA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cuaJquier unidad automatizada, Esta evaiuaci6n debc ta'valyiar todos los posibles efectos arnbientales, ixicluyendo la calidad del aiia, la contaminaci6n ac€istica y los impactos enel trAfico. Creo que cl proyecto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de }a CEQA,segunlasecci6n 15332(Clase32-PtoyectosdeDesarro}lo).Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos sigriificativos enet trAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o ia calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustarfa rccibir e} informe completo que lo demuestre.

2. Trsmsparencia sobre Ptaoblemas de Cotitanxinacx6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n ameriores asociados son el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarm. Especfflcamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, cuAles sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de lirnpieza asegui:ar&n la segiridad del suelo y del agua subterrhea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 77/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Amhiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para el i'nonitoreo atnbiental continuo cturame tas fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan delie detallar c6mo se rea)imrA e} monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de Ia constnicci6n e incluir plaiies de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor dirante Jas pruebas en la etapa de penniso de constucct6n. Proteger la salud de los nifios, las pobiacioxies vu)nerables y todos Jos miemtiros de la comunidad es de maxima impo rtancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Deeisiones:
o Solicito el estabiecimiento de 1111conse,io asesor comunitario que inc}uya a residentes, expcms en medio ari'ibiente y funcioxiarios de 121ciudad para supervisar 10S aSpeCtOSambientales del proyeCtO. EStO gataantiz.arA la taendici(5n de euelltaS Y brindarA a los residentes uxia voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto, S. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Aye. permaneeera en su augur:
o Ur,io encarecidamente a la ciudad a manterier cl K rail cerrado a todo trAfico. Levantar la barrera del K probab)emente conducirA a un auinento en }as emisiones de vehfculos, degradando am mis la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integraL de la calidaddel aire pga comprender log posiblcs impactos en )a salud de los residentes. AdemAs, abogo porrealizarpruebas de niveles de ruido paraevaluar los efectos de) aumento en el flujo de trafico y por un rnonitoreo continuo de los riiveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruir.lo si se levanta la barrera, Es esencia} itrvolucrar a expeitos en salud y medio ambiente para tina)izar estos iinpactos.

Conflo en que darAn a cstas preocupacioxies la atenci6n que rnerecen. (2'JA'l Ct!-@-5'<->
Fecl'ia
3 - :zLl = 26
76 OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
:r AHrivel4 Ri#S amopposingthe lOi30AdeJlaProject(the
"Project") Below, I haveoutlined my reasonsfor opposingand correspondingrequests to consider changjng my opposition:
]. Comprehensive Environmental Test'ng:
o JrequestthatthodeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Pyojeict is approved, This assessment should evaluate all potential environmentaI effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, } believe tl'iat the project should ixot be qualified as exempt under CBQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). ApprovaJ of the pro,ject may result in significant effects relating to traffic, rioiz, air quality, or water quality, }f this is not true, l would like to receive the comptehensive report that proves the above untrue.

2. I'ransparency on Contamination issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests wilk be cotiducted, which substances are of eoncem, and how clemi-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As tlxe Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. 011going Enviroximental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plaii for ongoin@ environmental monitoring throughout t!ie construction aiid operationa} phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wili be conducted post-construction arid inchxde contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerable popuiations, and all community memLiers is of utmost impoitance.
4, Accountability in Decision-Making:
o I request the establishment of a conu'nunity advisoiy board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee tl'ie environmental aspects of the project, This will ensure accountability and provide residerxts with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRail)toremaininplace:
o l strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to alt traffic, Removirig the K barrierwill fikely lead to increased veliicle emissions, ftnther degraduig air quality.

I req'uest a comprehensive air quality assessrnentto unaergtaiidthe potential health iiiipacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise leve) testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing n'ionitoring of air and noise polhttion levefs if tlie barrier is removed. Bngaging liealtli and environtnental experts to analyze these impacts is essential,
l tiaust that you will give these concerns the attention they deserve, Signature Date:
77 OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADEI.J,A PROJECT
I A/l0plH, NOvrx(rO .,am riliposingthe l0t30AdellaProject(the "Project") Below, I Naveoutliiied my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider clianging my opposition:
1, Comprehensive Environn'iental Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmentai ImpactAssessment (I;IA) before the Pro.iectis approvetl. This assessmentshould eyaluatealt potential enviroru'nental effects, including air qt'iality, noise polit'ition, and traffic impacts. I believe that tl'ie project sliould not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). ,Approval of tl'>eproject ruay result in significaiit effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. ff this is 110( (rue, I would like to receive the cornprehensi've report that proves tlie above untrue.
2, Transparency on Coniarnination Issues:
o [ seek detailed reports on past contaniination issues associated wit!i the project site and liow tliese wikl be addressed. Specifically, I would )ike to know wliat tests wi]l be conducted, wliicli substarices are of concenn, and I'iow clean-up measures wiil ensure soi! and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does 110( show fuxtlier testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing F,nvironmental Monitoring:
o f propose tlie estab)ishrnent of a p)all for ongoing environmental n'ionitoring througliout the constntction and operatioxial phases. This plan shorild outline how soil valaior monitoring wi!J beconductedpost-constniction andinclude contingency plans if vapor isstes are detected during testing at the building permi( stage.

Protecting the liealth of children, vultierable populations, and all cominunity members is of utmost importance.
4, Aecountability in Decision-Making:
o I reqriest tlie establishment of a comrmmity adyiisory board that includes residents, enviroiimeiital expeits, aixd city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the pro.ject. This will ettsure accountability and provicie residents with a voice in n'ionitoring the prqject's inipacts.

5. Adella Aye. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to rem:iiin in peace:
o I strongiy urge the city to keep tlie K rai} closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier uiill likely lead to increased veliicie emissions, ftirther degrading air quality, I request a comprehensive air qxiality assessment to undei:staitd the potential healtli impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level testing to evaluate tlie effects of increaseci tralIic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air ai'id noise pollution levels if tl'ie 'barrier is removed, E'i'xgaging hca}th aiid emrironmental expeits to ai"ialyze tliese in'ipacts is essential.

I trust tl'iat you will give tl'iese concerns the attention tliey deserve. 3 * ,:w
I)ate:
78 OPPOSITIONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
I "'l"a-!lr<@,,lcq, j"-ex,4Cxv'(() arnopposingtl'ie10130AdellaProject(the "l'roject") Below, I have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my oppositioii:

1. Cotnpreliensive 'Environmental Testing:
0 i request that the developer COndtlCt a thorough Environniental [rapaCt AS8eSSment (EIA) befote the Project is approved. This assessment glioutd evaluate all potentia) erivironmeiital effects, ixicludinB air qua(ity, noise po}lution, andtraffic impacts. I believe that the project sJioutd riot be qualified as exempt mder CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 'f5332 (Class 32-Developmenta}aProjects).Approval of the projectmay resultin significanteffects relatinB to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. if this is noi true, l would like to receive the comprehensive report tha( prove' the above uni>aue.

2. Tx'anspsu*ucyui.iCoutaminationIssues:
o } seek detailed reports oix past conttirnination issues associated with the project site and how these wUl be siddressed, Specificaliy, l would like to know what tests will be coiiducted, whiclt substances are of concem, and how c!ean-up meastires will ensure soii and grourxdwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sl'iow furtlier testing dorte afler 8/i 7/202L 3, Ongojng Environmental Monitoring:
o X propose tlte establishment of a plan for ongoing envitoximental monitoxing throcighout the constrriction axid operationa} phases, This plan sliould outline how soil vapormonitoring will be condticted post-construction aixd iricltide contingei'icy plttns if vapor issues are detected duririg tcstixig at. the buildiag perniit stage. Protecting tlie heafth or children, vulnerable populations, and all commiinity riienibers is of utmost iiriportance. 4, Aeeouxxtabiltty in Decisiorb-Makjng:
o } request the establishinent of :a conununit)i advisoty board that includes residents, cnvironmsntal experb, aiid city officials IU oversee the et'ivtrcuimental aspects of the project, This will exysure accountability and provide residents witb a voice in monitoring tl'ie project's impacts, S. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to reniaiti in place:
0 I
barrier
strongly urge the city 40 keep tiie K rail clozd to all traffic. RemovinB the K will likely featl to iricreased vehide emissions, fuitber degrading air quality. I request a comprehensive air quality assessnie'nt to rinderstand tlie potentia} liealtl':i impactson resideixts. Additional]y, ladvocate for iyoise level tesung to evaluatethe effec!s of increaset) trafTic tiow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise po})utiori fevers if the barrier is renioved, ]Engaging healt!i and eixvironmental experts to analyze these. in'ipacts is essential.
the altenlion they deserve,
-';5- :z4 2.5
Date:
79 ON)POS'iTION TO 10130 ADkLLA PROJECT
Project")Below,I l'iaveoutlinedmy reasonsfor opliosing andcorrespondingrequeststo consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environnaetitnl Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmental Impact Assessment (EiA) before the Project is approved. This assessment shorild evaiuate ali potential environmentai effects, including air quality, noisc pollution, and traffic impacts, I t>elieve that t]ie project should not be qualified as exempt under CBQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental ProjecU). Approval of the project may resuJt in significar'it effects relatiixg to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tliis is not true, } would like to receive the comprehensive report tl'iat proves tl'ie above untrue.

2. Transparency on Coxitamination issues:
o I seekdetailedreportson liast contarnmatioiiSSuesassociated witli the project site arid how tliese will lie addressed. Specificail)i, I svorild like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of' concern, and how clean-up measures wi)l ensure soil and groundwater safety. AS tlie Geo Tmclcer does not show further testing done afler 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing F.invironmenta} Monitoring:
o l propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing envirotaunaital tnonitoring throughout the construction and operaticnal pliases. This plan should outline liow soil yapor monitoi'ing will L'ieconductcd post-constructioii and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected dtring testing at the buildirig permit stage. !)rotecting (he health of chi}dreri, vulnerable populations, axid ail community members is of utn'iost irnportance.

4. Accountaliility in Decision-Making;
o J request the establisl'iment of a comrnunity advisory board that :inchit!es residents, enviiaonmental experts, axid city officials to oversee the cnviroru'ri,ental aspects of l:he project, This 'wiil ensure accounCabili(:y aiid provide residents with a voice in monitoring ll'ie project's impacts.

5. AdenaAve.ConcreteBarrier(:KRan)torcmaininplace:
o
l strorigly urgethe city to keeptheK rail closedto all traffic. Removin@ the K barrier will likely lead to increased veliicle emissions, fuxther degrading air quality.

Trequest a comprehensiye air quality assessment to ymderstai'id the potential health impacts on residei'it.s. Additionally, tadvocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing nioriitoring, of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed.EngaBing liea)th and errvironmental experts to ana]yze tliese i'inpacts is essential,
l tust that you will give tliese concerns the attention tliey deserve.

Signature
3i'zHlvB
Date:
80 OPPOSITION TO iOi30 ADEI,LA PROJECT
k t,v(e ?#,,,, arll opposing the 10130 Adclla I)roject (the "Project") Below,}have outlit'ied my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to corisider changing my opposition:

1. Compreliensive Enviroximental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedevejoperconductathoroughEnvironmentalImpactAsscssn'hent (EXA) before the Project is approved. Tliis assessment should evaluate all poteiitiat en'vironmental effects, inciuding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project sbould not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under sectioii 15332 (Class 32-De'velopmentai Projects). Approval of tlie prqject may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quaiity, or water quality. If this is not true, l would like to receive thc comprelieiaisive repoit tliat proves tbe above t.mtruc.

2. Transparency on Contan'ijnation Issues:
o I seek detailed repoits on past contan'iination issues associated witli t}ie project site aiid how these will be addressed. Specifically, I woxild like to know wtat tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clcan-up mea.qures wilt ensure soil and groundwater saf'ety. As the Geo Tracker does not sl'iow further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
0 I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental moni(oring throughout the construction and operational pbases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wil) be coiiducted post-constniction aitd include contingency plai'is if vapor issues are detccted during testing at the building permi( stage.

Protecting the health of children, i'u!nerable populations, itnd all communily mcnibers is of utmost impoitance,

4. Accountabili(y in DecisionfMaking:
c L request the establishinent of a cominunity ad'visory board tlxat includes residcnts, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the envimnmental aspects of be liroject. This win ensureaccoun(ability and provide resideiits with a voice in monitoring the project's i.inpacts. 5, Adella Aye. Concrete Barrier (K Rajl) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge tlxe city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing tlte K barrier wil) Iilcely }ead to increased vehicie emissions, further degrading air quaiity.

Irequest a compreliensive air quaiily *issessrnent to understand fhe potentiak health impacts on residents. Additionally, 1 advocate for noise Icve] testing to evaluatc the effects of it"icreased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noisc pollution levels if tlte bartier is removed. Engaging liealth and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
1 trust that you will ave these concerns the attention they deserve. oblWhz( Da(e:
81 oposxcx6s At PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el"Proyecto"'), A contixyuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para 6poi-iemxey lag solicitudcs co.izspondientes para co:siderar carnbiar mi oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Ambiemales Exhaustivas:
o 8o}icito que et desarrol)aaorrealice itna Rvaluaci6n de [mpaclo Arnbiental (EiA) exhaiistiva antes de que se implemente cuaiquiet unidad automattzada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar U;idos los posibles efectos ambienta!es, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contarnimci6n ac('isticay ios impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no de.berfa caiificar como exento bajo la IExenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA,[email protected] 15332(Clase32-ProyectosdeDesatroi2o). Laaprobaci6i'i del proyecto podr[a tener efectos significativos en e} trAfico, el 'it'iido, la calidad del aire o la calidad deitagua, De rio ser asf, nie gustaria recibir eI inforrne completo que lo demaestre.

2. Transparencta sobre Problemas de Containinacion.
o Busco iriformes detal}ados sobre problemas da ciontan'iinaci6a anteriores asociados con eJsitio de.!proyecto y c6mo se abordarb, Espectficamente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebasse rea!izarAn, guAles sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las rnedidas de limpieza asegurazmla seguridad de} suelo y dcl agua subterrhea, Dado que ei aeo Tracker no muestra pruebns adicionales realimdas despu6s del 17/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Ambienkl Continuo:
.o Propongo el establecintiento dei un pLaii pun el monttoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y opcraci6n, Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizar4 el monitoreo de vaporde suelo despu6s de laconstrucci6n e incluirplanes de coiit.ingencia si se detectaix probiemas da vapor durantc las piebas en la etapa de pexmiso de cons€rucci6n. Proteger la saiud de los nifios, )as pobiaciones vtttnerablesy todos Jos miembros de ta comunidad es de rnAximu importancia.

4. Responsmbttidad en la Toma de Decistones:
o Solicito el establecimiento da un consejo asesor comtyrii!ario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y funcionarios de ta ciudad para supervisar 108 aspcctos ambientale,g del ptoyecto. L'sto garantizarA la rendici6ri de cuentas y brindarA a los reside.ttes una voz en el moni'ioreo de log impactos del.proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecer6 en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidmnente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo tifico, r,evaiitar tabarrera del K probabtemente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradatido aun mas ia calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n iritegral de la cakidad del aire pars comprender ios posibles ixnpgtos eri la sa!ud de lloo8sreefse"cdteonsfedselAadum'en'Sto'aebxxogcotflOujrored'e' riiveles de contaminaci6ri del aize y det ruido si se ie'vanta la barrera. Es esencial invo!ucrar a expertos en salud y medio arnbientc para analizat estos impactos, Conflo en que dari a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n qte mereceai.

Fiyma
IIRP
Fecha
82 OPX'O,!a't'iIONTO 10130ADELLAPROJECT
s fflC)tre-OyRA!\l'l'f'2- amopposin3the 10130AdellaProject(the "Project") Below, I have outliried my reasonsfor opposing ad mrrespondingrequests to consider ehanging my opposition:
1, Comprehensive Environmenta} Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved, This assessmentshould evaluateall potentiai environmental effects, iricJuding,air quality, ixoisepoHution, and traffic impacts, I believe tliatttte projectshoutd not beqmified asexempt underCEQA Categortcal Exemption under section 25332 (Class 32-Developmental %jects), Appmvai of the project may mult in signtficant effegts relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quaiity, If this is not true, l would iike to zceive die comprehensive report that pmvesthe above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues: a
o Iseekdetailedrepottsonpastcontamtnationisstiesassociatedwiththeprojectsite and Jxowtlxesewill be addressed.Specifically, I would like to kriow whattests wtli be conducted, which substances are of corxcern,and how clean-up measures wall ensure soil and groundwater safety. AS the Geo Tracker does not show further testitig done afbr 8/17,12021.

3. Oogoing Environmental Monitoring:
o x propose the establishmeiitof a lilan for ongoingenvironmental monitoring thmughout the conmuction and operatiorial phases, This pJarishould ouiline how soiivapormonitoringwill beconductedpost-consttuctioriand incjudecontingency plans if vapor issues are detected du6ng testing at the building permit stage, hotecting the health of children,vulnerablepopulations,and alf cornaiunit5r members is ofutmost importance,

4. Accountabil(ty JhaDevision Makmg'
o Irequesttheestabiishrnentofacornmunityadvisoryboardthatincludesresidents, enyironmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspectsof the project. This will ensure accotintabiJity d provide residents wtth a voice in monitoring the project's impacts,

5. Adella Aye. Concrete Barrier (K Raid) to remain finplace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to ali traffic. Removing the K barrier wi)llikely }ead to inmased vehicleemisstons, furtmrdeiry airqualtty, I request acomprehensive air qua!atyassessmnt to understandthe potential heatth impacts on resideiitg. Additionally, Iadvocate for rioise level testing to evalate the effects of increased taffic flow and for ongoing moiiitoring of air and noise pol(ution levels if the barrier is removed, Engaging health and enviroental experts to analyze these impam is essential.

Ihbstthatyou;vin theseconcernstheattentiontheydeserve,
5ga-.)5- aCer
Dpte:
83 OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
correspondientes para consideraia cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Anibicntales Exhaustivas:
o SoHcito que el desmroJlador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto.biental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatimda. Esta evaluaci6n debe eve)oar todos log posibJes efectos ambientales, inc}uyendo la calidad dei mre, la contaminaci6n acusiica y tag irnpactos en el ttAfico, Creo que el proyecto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de ka CEQA, segt"in !asecci6n !5332 (Ciase 32 -Proyectos deDesarroLto). Laapxobaci6n del proyecto potirfa tener efectos siguificativos en eI tiThco, el ruido, la calidad del aiie o la ca!idad del agua. De no ser asf, rn6 gustarfa recibir cl infotme completo que lo demuestre
24 Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco irifoimes detallados sobre probiernas de contatnirhaci6n anteriores aso6iados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo S8a&rdarAn. Especfficamcnte, ine @ustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se reaJizam, cuAles sustancias son preocupmxtes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurar!kn la segtiridad del suelo y del agua subterrAi'iea, Dado que ei Oeo Tracker no mucstra pruebas adicionaies realizadag despu6s del 17/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Conti:nuo:
.o Propongo ei establecimiento de un Iilan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante }as fases de coiistrucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizar4 ei rnonitoreo de vaporde sueio despu6s de ia construcci6n c incluir planes de contirigenc:ia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de perrniso de eonstt'ucci6ri. Proteger la salud de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de Ia comunidad es de rnAxima impocia.

4. RespousabUlidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o So$icito el estable.cirmento d.e un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya & residentes, expeitos en medio i-unbicnte y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del pmyecto. Esto garaiitizarA la rcndici6n de cuentas y brindarA a ios residentes una vo; en el monitoreo de 108 impactos dei proyecto. 5, La baxrera (K Rail) de Adella Aye. permaneeera eu su lugar:
0 +Jrjo encarecidamente a la cimad a n'iantener el K rail cerrado a todo trffifico.

Levantaia }a tiairera del K probabiemente conducirA a rin aumento an las emisiones de vehiculos, degradando aun mis la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integra) de la ca}i deJ aire para comprerider }os posibles impactos an la salud da los residentes. Ademm, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluat kos efectos del aumento en et flujo da trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de los i>iveles de contaminnci6n del aire y dcl ruido si se icvanta la barrera. Es esencia] invo!ucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos, Conflo en quc dar6n a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

Fecha
(J'9 84
OPOS1C16NAL rirxoygeroioiso ADELLA
Yo F(.0g,x (i5(!t('y-} ,,nieoponHoal%yeatoiOl30hdella (el "Proyecto"), A contmuacioii, )ie expuesto :inis ray,ones para oponern'ie y }as solicitudes correspondientes para considerar carnbiar mi oposici6n:

L Pruebas AmbfentaJes Exhaustlvas:
o Solicito que el desa'tro}lador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambienffll (E}A) exhaustiva antes de qtie se imp!emeute cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n de.be evaiuar todos 105 posib}es efectos arnbientales, incluyendo la calidad del atre, ja contaminaci6n actistica y 105 impactos en e4trAfico, Creo que el provecto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo ia Exenci6n Categ6rica de }a CBQA, segun !a secci6n 15332 (Cease32 - Proyectos de Desarrol)o), La aprobaci6xi del proyecto podrfa tenet efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, Jacatidad&'j aire o ta calidad del agua. De no ser asf, tne gugtatfa recibir el informe con'ipleto que !o demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contatnbiiici6ni
o Busco informes detal}ados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores aso6iados cori el sitio del proyecto y c6rno se atiordaffln. Especif'xcamertte, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se reafiy.arffin, cu61es sustancias son preocupatites y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurar6n la seguridad del suclo y del agua subteri*ea, Dado qtie el Geo Tracker rio muestra prttebas adicioxiales rea}izadas deepu6s del i7/08/2021,

3. Monttoreo Anibiental Continuo:
.o Propongo el estatlecitrtiento de un plai'i para el monitoreo ambiendal continuo durante las fases de constcucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe deta!Jar c6mo se realizara.el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de ia construcci6n e inchtir planes de contingericia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6m. Proteger la sa)ud de los nifios, las poblaciones vuinerab]es y todos IOSmiembros de ka coinunidad es de maxima importancia. 4, Responsabilidad en la Tom:v de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos an medio ainbiente y funciormrios de la giudad para supcrvisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rcndici6n de cuentas )i brindarA a los residentes uria voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permaneeerffi en su higari o Urjo enr,arecidamerite a la ciudad a mantener ei K rail cerrado a todo trAfico. levantar la barvra deJ K pzobablemente condiicirA El un aumento en las emisiones de vehJcuios, degradando arm mb la calidad del aire, Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprendertos posibles impactos en la salud de los residentes. AdemAs, abogo por realizarpruebas de niveles de ruido paraevaluar Josefectosdel aumento en el flqio da uAfico y por un i'nonitoreo continuo de los niveles de wntaminaci6n del aite y del ruido si se lcvanta la barrera. Es esencial invoiucrar a expeitos ei'i satud y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en que darAn Elestas preocupaciones la atemci6n qtie merecen.

Firma
53-a5 - ,QOaS
Pecha
(/,f 85
OPOSICION AL PROY:ECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el"Proyecto"). A coritinuaci6n, he expuea6 mis razones para oponerie y las soiicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que cl desarroliador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se impJemente cuaiquier tinidad automatizada. Esta evaJuaci6n debe evaluar todos los posiblcs efectos amlyientales, incluyendo [a calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y los impactos en el trAfico, Creo que el proyecto no debe.tfacalificar COITIO exento ba3ola Exenci6n Categ6rica ds=la CEQA, seg'Cmla secci6n l 5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos da Desairollo), Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tenet efectos significativos en ei trAfico, ei ruido, la calidaddel aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser agf, me gustarfa recibir eI infotrne comp!eto que l.o demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminnei6u:
o Busco informes detauadossobre probiernas de contnniinaci6n aiiteriores asociados con el sitio deJ proyecto y C61T10se abordark. Especificai'nente, me guMaria saber qu6 pruebas ge realizari, cuAtes sustancias son preocupantes y C6mO Jasmedidas de }impieza asegurmAn la segt'iridad de2 suelci y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que ei aeo Trac!cer no muestra pruebas adicionates realizadas despu6s dei 17/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Contiitiio:
.o Propongo el estabieciiniento de LIII plan para el monitoreo arnbiental continuo durante ias fases de construcci6n y operac.i6n. 'jEste plan &be detallar c6mo se realizara el monitoreo dc vapor de suelo despu<:sde laconstrucci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor duraute las pruebas en }a etapa de permiso de con,mrucci6n. Proteger la salud de 10S ni5os, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos log miembros de la comunidad as de mAxima importaixcia,

4. Responsabi!idad en ia Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor c.omunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio axnbiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto, Egto g,arantizarA lmrendici6n de cuentas )i brindai a kos residentes urta voz en el inoriitoreo de los ii'npactos de! proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permaneeera en su lugari o Urjo ericarecidainente a ta ciudad a manteiner el K rail cerrado a todo trffico. levantar )a bamra de! K probablemeute conducirA a un aumento en las emisioxies de vebiculos, degradando ak rags fa caiidad del aire. Solicito tuia evuluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire pga comprenaer !os posib2es impactos en la salud de !os residentes, AdemAs, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar los efectos del aumento an eJ flujo de trAfico y por uc irioyiitoreo continuo de los niveles de contaminsci6n del aire y dat tuido si se levanta Jabam=ra, Es esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente, paza malizm estos impactos.

Conflo en que darffi a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

FLlrma(y,.17i)':i,trp(t.-1. Fccha
86 (el"Pre>yecto":). A contintxaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para 6pon-erme y ragsoiicitudcs correspondientes para considerar ca.ibiar mi oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarro!llactor realice tma Evaluaci6n de Impacto Arnbienta} (E[A) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluur todos los posibles efectos axnbientalcs, inc}uyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n actxstica v los impactos en el bAf'xco. Creo que el proyecto no deberla c.aUficar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA,seganlasecci6n 15332(Clase32-ProyectosdeDesarrollo).Laaprobaci6n delproyectopodrla tenerefectossiHnificativos enel trMco, el rtido, la calidad dei aire o ta caiidaddel agua,De no ser agf,nie @ustariarecibir el informe comp}eto que ko detnuestre.

2. Transpareneta sobre Problemas de Contarninaci6n:
o Busco iriformes detaliados sobre problemas de contarninaci6n aiiteriores asociados con el sitio de! proyecto y c6mo se abordarm, Especfficmnente, ine gustarfa saber )eu6)1,pmtpxileebmasas:egrellaifflirz:i,>sceu:u\,e.sdast:dtaenlcsiua:, Dlaasdmo eqdlliedaesl
Geo 'I'racker no muesta pruebas adicionales realizadas degpu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
.o Propon@o Ol estabjecimiento de un plarx para el monitoreo ambientai continuo durante las fases de coristrucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el tonitoreo de vapor de suekodespu6s de laconstrucci6n e incluir ptanes de contingericia si se detectai'i proti!emas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger ta sa!ua de )os nifios, tag poblaciones vulnerables y todos JO!!'miembros de Jacomuriidad es de m&ma importancia.

4. Regponsabilxdad en !a Toma de Deeisfones:
o Solicito e) establecimiento de uri consejo aseso.: coinunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en media ambicnte y ftmcionarios de la ciudad para supcrvisar 108 aspectos arnbientales del pmyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6ri de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una voz en el monitorco de 10!' impactos dei proyecto.

5. La barreix (K Ratl) de Adella Ave. permaneeerffi en sti lugar:
o tJrjo encarecidamente a ta ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trffico.

I,evantar la barrera del K probab}emente conducir6 a un aumento en fas emisiones de veMculos, degmdando aThnrubs la calidad dcl aire. 8olicito una evaluaci6n ii'ite@raJde la calidad del aire pza comprender 108 posibles impactos an la salud de los resictentes. Aaemas, ubogo porrealizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaiuar los efectog deJ aumento en el f!ujo de trs4&o y por un monitoreo continuo de Jos niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y dei ruido si se )evanta la barrera. Es esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambicnte para anatizav estos impactos.

Contlo en que darAn a estas preocupaciones !a atcnci6n que mereccn.

Firma Fecha
87 OPPOS}TION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testimng:
* lrequestthattliedeve}operconductathoroughEnviroiaunentatlmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved, This assessment should evalutrte al) potential environmental eff'ects, inc]uding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe tlaat the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorica} Exemption under section t5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approyat of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, iioise, air quality, or water quality, If this is not true, I would like to receive the compreliensive report that proves the above cintruc.

2. I'ransparency on Coutaminatioii Issues:
@
and
l seek
liow
detailed reports on pastcontaniination issuesassociatedwitli the project site these will be addressed. Specificaily, l would like to know wliat tests wil} be conducted, which substances are of ccince.rii, aiid how clean-up measures will ensure soil axid groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show fiirther testing dorie afl:er 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmemal Monitoring:
@ I proposc the establishn'iem of a pJaii for ongoing environmentai n'ionitoring througliout the construction and operatioi'xal pliases. This plaii should outline how soil yapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during (esting at t]'ie building permit stage. Protecting the health of cliildren, vu)nerable populations, an<.'l aJI cornrnunity .inen'ibers is of utmost importance.

4. Accountability in Decisioxi-Makixig:
# I request the establislnnent of a con'irnunity advisory board that includes residents, environmcnta} experts, and city officials to oversee the environ'inental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring tlie liro3ect's impacts. 5, Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remaixi in place: d barrier
I strongly
wiil
urge
lilcely
the city to keep the K rail closed t<:iElll traffic. Remoying the K lead to increascd veliicle einissions, further degradirig air quality, I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understaitd the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level testing to evaltiate tlie effects of ii'icreased Lraffic flow aiid for ongoing monitoring of air and noise polliitioxi Levels if the barrier is removecl Engaging health ax'id em+ironmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

Itrust tl'iat you will give these concerns the atterition tl'iey deserve.

D')>i,ql;Is
88 OPPOSITiON TO 10130 ADE[LA l)ROJECT
Project") Below,Ihave outlinectiny reasons for opposing and corrcsponding requests to coiisider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
* l request that the developer conduct a thorough En'vironrnental Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmentaJ effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, [ lyelieve that the prqject should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categoricai Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Dgvelopmental Projects), Approval of tlie project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves tlie above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
* 'i seek detailed reports on ptist contamination issues associated with tlie project site and liow these:will be addressed. Specificalty, l would tike to know what tests will be conductecl, which subst<uices are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show fuxtl'ier testing dorie after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental !\lonitoring:
* T propose u'ie estalylislimem of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operationat phases. Tlns plan shocild outline how soi} vapormonitoriiig will be conducted post-construction ai'id inchide contingency plans if vapor issues are detected dtring testing at t}ie building permit stage.

Protecting the heakth of children, vulnerable populations, and all commui'iity n'iembers is of utinost importaitce

4. Accountability in Decision-M[aking:
* I request tlie establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, Tliis will ensure accountability and proyide residents with a voice in monitoring the prqject's ixnpacts.

5. Adclla Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remiiin in peace:
@ I strongly urge the city to keep the K raii closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased veliicle emissions, fuither degrading air quality. 1 requcst a comprehensive air qriality assessment to understand the poten(ial hea)th impacts on rcsidettts. AdditioxialJy, Jadvocate for noise Jevel testing to evaluate the effects of increased trafflc flow aiid for cingoitig monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is rerrioved. Engaging healtli and ensitironmentai experts to analyze ti'iese impacts is essential.

Itrust that you will give tliese concerns tlie attention they deserve.

Date:
10 89
oposxci6's AL pnoyigcro 10130 ADELLA
Yo ' !(Wontinuaci6i!', ie'!Cp:tomisrazoiiesmparea( Ojo)Onneorl"'nen yrWas :IoolilcOitlr3idoe's correspondieaes para considerar cainbiar my oposici6i'i:
1, Pruebas Ambicntaics Ex}iaustivas:

Solici[o que el desarrollador realice rina Evaluaci6u de Impacto Ambiental (E!A) exliaustiva antes de que se implemente cualqriier unidud t'iutomatizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos )os posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, ia contaminaci6n ac4sticay los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deber{a calificar como exertto bajo fa Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segt"iu lasecci6n }5332 (Cfase 32 - Proyectos de DesarroJ]o). r+aaprobaci6n de) proyecto podria (ener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la catidad del aire o la calidad del agua. Dc no scr asf, me gustarfa recibir el informe completo que lo demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaniinaci6n:
si Busco informes detal)ados sobre pmblemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordaran. Especfficamente, me gustarfa saber Qll6 pruebas se realizztran, cuAles sustaiicias son preocupax'ites y c6mo las t'nedidas de lirnpieza asegurarAn !a seguridad del sueLo y del aglla subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no mues(ra pruebas adicionates realizadas despu6s del ] 7/08/2021, 3, Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
* Propongo el establecimienlo de un plan pai'a el monitoreo ambiental continuo duraitte las fases de constiucci6n )i operaci6n. Este plan clebe dei:allar c6mo se realizarA cl monitGreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la constt'ucci6n e inc}uir planes de contingencia si se detectan pro'blemas de vapor durantc las prucbas en la etapa de pertniso de construcci6n. Protcger la sa}ud de 10S nifios, las pob)aciones vulnerables y todos Jos miembros de la ctymunidad es de mAxima importancia. 4, Responsabiiidad en la l'oma de Decisiones:
* Solicito el establecimiento de un conscjo asesor comunitario qhie incluya a resideutes, expertos en niedio ttmbiente y fuitcionarios de IEIciudad para supervisar fos aspectos aJnbienta!es del proyecto. Hsto garantizara ia rendici6n de cuentas y biindara a los residentes rina voz en el monitoreo tie ios impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrerii (K Riiil) de Adedla Ave. permiineeer* en su tugar:
* Urjo ericarecidarnente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo ti*fico, I,evantar la barrera del K probablementc conducirA a cm acimento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradtu'ido Elllll mis la calidad de) aire, Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles in'ipactos en la salud de 108 residentes. AdemAs, abogo por rcalizar prctcbas de rtiveles de ruido para eva)uar los efec[os del arimento an el flciio de trAlico y pot un monitoreo continuo da los nivefes de containinaci6n del aire y dcl ruido si se levaitta la barrera. IEs esenciai involucrar a expertos en sahid y medio tunbiente para ana)izar estos impactos.

Conflo en que daii'i a estas prcocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

LY/C"o';""oJ'oi Fecha
11 90
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADF,LLA
Yot'j'lA4/" an mcopongoalPrriyectolOl30Adella
(el"Proyect!g. A comimiacie\le expuesto mis rag,ones para oponerme y las solicitudes coirespondientes para considerar cainbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Praebas Ambientales Exhaust'ivas:

Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (ETA) exhatistiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizatla. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posib}es efectos ambientakes, incluyendo in calidad del aire, la contaianinaci6n ac(istica y 103 impactos en el trafico. Creo que el proyecto iio deberia calificar coxno exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segun lasecci6n 15332 (Class 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). La aprobaci6n del proyec(o podria tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la catidad del aire o la calidad de! agua, De no ser asi, me gustaria recibir el infaorme completo que lo demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Prolilenms de Contnminaei6n:
* Busco iiifo'iwies detallactossobrelirobleirias de contaminaci6n aitteriorcs asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo seabordarAn.Especificaniente,me @ustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se realizar6n, cuAles sustancias son preocupai':ites y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurairi la seguridad del suelo y del agua suliterrAnca. Dado que el aeo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas <1espu6sdel l7/08/202i

3. Monitoreo Ambientnl Continuo:
* Propongo el establecimiento de rm plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo duraiite )as fases de construcci6n y opcraci6n. Este playt debe detalkar c6rno se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor cle suelo despu6s de )a construcci6n e incluir pkanes de contirigericia si se detectanproblemas de vaI'ior dutaiite las pruebasen la etapa de permiso de constrttcci6n. Proteger la salud de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos Jos miembros de la comunidad es de rnAxirna importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Tona dc Decisiones:
* SoJicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor co:inunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos eii inedio ambiente y furicionarios de la ciudad para supervisar }os aispectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA ka rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residerites una voz en el moiiitoreo da los impactos del proyecto. 5, La barrera (K Raid) de Adella Ave. permsinecerA en su lugar:
* Ur,io encarecidamen(ea ia ciudad a rnatilener el K rctil cerrado a todo trafico, Levantar la barrera del K lirobablen'ienteconducirAa un aumento an las emisiones de vel'iiculos, degradando akin mis la caiidad del uire. Soiicito uua evaluaci6n integraI de ia calidad de! aire.l:)aracomprenderlos posibles impactos en la saJuddc los residentes. Adernas, abogo por realizar pruebas cte nivelcs de ruido para evaluar los cfectos deJaumeiito en el flt4jo de tr6fico y por i.tn i'noniloreo continuo de los niveles <te contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si sc levanta la barrcra. Es esencial invo)ucrar a cxpertos en sahrd y mecHo ambiente para analizar estos impactos.

Con'fio en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atcnci6n que merecen.

Firma
/SX /
vv v\/ A,voy
Fecha
J2, 91
OPOSICION AL PRO\ECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el "Pioyecto"). A contin'uffici6n, he expuestomis rn:ffines para oponerme y fas solicitudes correspondientes para comiderar carnbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambjentales Exheustjvas:
o Solicito que el desarrotlador realice una Bva}uaci6n de Impacto Ambienta) (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. r3sta evah'iaci6h debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ainbientales, irtcluyendo ]a catidaddel aire, la contaminaci6n actxstica y 105 impactos en el trAfico. Creo que,el proyecto no deberfa caJificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CP,QA, zgt'in lasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrotlo). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podr4a terxer efectos significatjvos en e) ttAfico, el ruido, }a calidad del aire o !a calidad del a5gua.De no ser asf, me gustaria recibir el informe completo qae lo den'iuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Probleinas de Contaminaci6ti:
o Busco informes detaliados sobre problemas de contarninaci6n anteriores aso6iados con e! sitio dei proyecto y c6rno se abordarAn, Espccfficarnente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se rea!izarm, cuAles sustancias soa preocupantes y c6mo Jasn*edidas de limpie:z,a asegurarAn la seguridad de} sueio y del agua subterrAnca. Dado que el (ieo 'Tracker no muestra pruebas adicioriales reaJizadas despu6s del 27/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Coxitinuo:
.o Proponzo el estabJecimientode uii plan I:iara el monitoreo arnbiental continuo durante las fases de construeci6n y operaci6n. 13ste plan debe detallar c6mo se rea}izarA e) monitoreo de vaporde suelo despu6s de la construcci6rt e inciuir pkanes de contingencia si se detectan. problemas de vapor durante las pn>ebas en Ia etapa de peiniso de construeci6n, Proteger la saiud de 108 nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos 10Smiembms de la comunidad as de mAxima importancia,

4. Regponsabilidad en la Tonia de Decisiones:
o Solicito ei establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluyu a residexites, expertos en medio arnb'<ente y funcioriarios de la ciudad para supervjsar 108 aspectos amlyientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindat'A ri los residentes tunavoz en el monitoreo de 103 impactos dcl proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en su iugar:
o U6o encarecidamentea la ciudad a manterzr el K rail cetrado a todo tAfico, I,evantar Labaxrera del K. probabjernente conducirA a un aumento en lag cinisiones de vehfculos, deBtadandoarin mis fa calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n imegral de la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos eri la salud de 105 residentes. Adern*s, abogo porrealizar pruebas de niveies de ruido paincvaJuar log efectos del aumento en el flujo de trfflco y por un momtoreo continuo de Ios nivek,s de contaminaci6a del aire y det ruido si se Icvanta la barrera. Bs escnciat involucrar a expertos 611salud y medio axubients para anati:mr estos impactos. 'lirma
y
Fecha
1) 92
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6ri, he expuesto-'fnis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cainbiar ini oposi.ci6ii:
1, Pruebas Arnbientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarro}}ador realice una Evatuaci6n de Irnpacto Ambienta} (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cuaIquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debei evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la ca.[idad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y los in"ipactos en el trfifico, Creo que el proyecto no deberfa ca!ificar cotno exento ba,iola Exenci6n Categ6ricade ta CEQA, seg€in lasecci6n 15332 (C}ase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrta tener efectos significativos en e?trAfico, el ruido, la ca)idad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir el inforine completo que lo demuestre,
2, Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6tt:
o Busco inforrnes detallados gobre problernas de contatninacj6n anteriores asoa6iados con e} sitio del iiroyecto y c6moseabordarAn.EspecZficarnente, me gustarfasaber qu6 pi'uebas se re:izarAn, cuAles sustancias son preocupantes y c6rno ias rnedidas de limpieza asegtltark la seguridad dei suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales rea{izadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
.o Propongo el estabiecimiento de un plan para el monitoreo arnbiental contiiiuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe dctallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de }a construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor dtuante lag pruebas en la etapa de Ixrrniso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los niffos, Ias poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de maxima importancia,

4. ResponsabilidadenlaToniadeDeeisiones:
o Solicito cl establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio annbiente y funcionarios de IEIciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambicntaies del proyecto. Esto garoantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una voz en el monitoreo de JOSimpactos del proyecto,

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adel{a Ave. permanecerffi en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidarnente a la ciudad a maritener el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico, Levantar la barrera del K probablemente conducirAa in atuanento en tas emisiones de vehfciilos, degradando aun mis la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6ri integraj de la caiidad de aire para comprenderlos posibles impactos en ia salud de 108 residentes, AdemAs, abogo por realizatptuebas de niveles de iuido para eyaluar kosefectosdel aumentoeri el flujo de trAfico >rpor un monitoxto continuo de los nive)es de contmninaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera, ES esencial involucrar a expertos an salud y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en que dari'i a estas preocupaciones Ja atenci6n que merecen, Firma Fecha
93 OPOS1C16N AL PROYECTO 10130 ADF,LLA
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, lie expue'sto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspoxidientes para considerar cainbiar mi oposici6n:

L Pruebas Ambientales Exlinustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrofkador reaiice una Evaluaci6n de banpacto Ambiental (BIA) exhaustiva antes de que se impiemente cualquier unidad autornntizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posib}as efec(:os ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contan'iinaci6n actistica y los impactos en cl trAfico Creo que cl proyecto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Catcg6tica de la CEQA,seganlasecci6nl5332 (Clase32- ProyectosdeDesarrollo).LaaIitobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la caiidad del airc o la calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir e.l informe completo que lo dernuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contarntnaci6n:
o Busco ixifo'rmes detal)ados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn, Especfficamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se reatizarii, curies sustancig son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de }impieza aseguraran la seguridad del sueto y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que cl Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s de1 i7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para el moi:iitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases da coristrucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detal)ar c6mo se realizar!tel monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la constiaucci6n e incluir plancs de contingencia si se detectaii problemas dei vapor di.irante las pruebas en )a etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Pmteger la salud de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comtinidad es de maxima impoitarxcia. 4, ResponsabMidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimienlo de un consejo asesor comui'fftario que incluya a residentes, cxpertos en medio ainbiente y funcionarios de Ia ciudad p supervisar ios aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garanttzarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a 103 rcsidentes una VOZ en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. Lu barrera (K Raid) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en su ]ugar; o Urjo encarccidai'nente a la ciudad a manterier el K rai} cerrado a todo trAfico. Lcvantar IEIbaxrera del K probablemente coriducira a un aumento en las eniisiones de vehfculos, deg,radando aun mis la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integra} de la ca[idad dek aire para compreiider los ptisibles in'spactos en la snlud de 108 residentes, AdemAs, abogo pot realizar pruebas de nivelcs de ruido para evaluar Ios efectos del aumento eri el flujo de trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de los riiveles da contaminaci6n dcl aire y del ruido si se Ievanta la barrera. ES esencial involucraia a expertos en sa}ud y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en qrie darAn a estas preocupaciones ia atenci6n que merecen. "Firma ) A4. :LO15'
Fecha
T5 94
OPPOSITION I'0 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
Project") Below,Ihave outlined n'iy reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental l'esting:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environrcntal Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. Tliis assessment should evaluate ali potentia) environmental effects, including air quality, noise pol)utioii, ai'id traffic impacts. I be)ievetl'xat the project sliould not be quakified as exempt under CEQA Categorica) Exemption uiider section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approyal of tlie project may result in significant effects relatixig to traflic, noise, air quality, or water quality. if this is not true, I would like to receiye tlie coi'nprehensive report that proves the vbove untrue.

2. 'I'ransparency on ConUunination Issues:
o I seekdetailedreportsonpastconta'ininationissuesassociatedwitli tlie prqiectsite and how these will be addressed. Specifically, l wouid like to know what tests will be conducted, whicl'i substances are of concern, and how c!can-up measures will ensure soil and groundwaler safety. As the Geo Tracke.r does not sliow furtl'ier testing done after 8/'17/2021.

3. Ongotng Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing enyironmental moiiitoring tlirougl'iout tlze construction ai'td operational pliases. Tliis pJan aliocild outline how soiJ vapor moniCoxing wili be conducted post-construction and incluclc contingency plans if vapor issues bre cietecred during lesting at the bi.rilding permit stage.

Protecting the liealtli of chi}dren, vulnerable populations, anc) all community members is of utmost importance.
4, Aceountability in Decision-MHI<ing:
o l request the establishthent of a comtnunit'y advisory board tha( inc)odes resitlents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee tlie environmental aspccts of the prqject. aI'hiswill ensure accountabiiity and prosiidc residents with a voice in monitorin@ the liroject's impacts.
5, ,kdella Ave, Coxicrete Barrier (K Riiil) to remain in peace:
<, I stiongly urge the city to keep tl'ie K rail closert to all tmffic. Removing tlte K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degradirig air quality, I request a compreliexisive all' quality asSeSSlnellt to u'lderStand the potentlal lleaRh impacts on residents. Additionally,Iadvocate foxanoise level testing to evaluatc the effects of increased traffic flow aihd for ongoing monitoririg of air and noise po&ition levels if tlie barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmental expei-ts to analyze tliese impacts is essentia).
you will g,ive these concerns fbe attention tl'iey deserve. ,k ,,,J2, 3- 25 - 2D:2S
Date:
95 01)POSITION TO 10130 ADEI,I,A PROJECT
Proj*l') Belowjliave oyitlined my t'casons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
0 l request that tbe developer conduct a tliorocigh Environmental ImpactAssessn'ient (EIA) before the Project iS approved. This assessnnentsliou)d evaluate a}i potential enyironmental effects, inclucting air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. r believe that tl'ie project should ttot be quaiified as exen'ipt bmder CBQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta) Projects). Approval of tlie project may result in significant effec(:s relating to traff-ic, noise, air quality, or water quality, lf this is not titie, l would like to receive the comprehensiye report that proves tlie above untrue.
2, Transpare.ncy on Contamination issues;
o :[ seek detailed repoits on past contan'iination iSsues associated with the project site and IIOWthese wiii Lieaddressed. Specifically, I svouid like to know what tests wikl be conducted, wliidi substarices are of concern, and how clean-up ineasures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. AS tlie Geo Tracker does not SIIOW further testing done at'er 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Enviromnerital Monitoring:
o i propose the establisliment of El plan for ongoing enviroi'u'nental n'ionitoring tlirouglxout tlie constructioii tuid operationai phases, Tliis plan shouJd outiine l'iow soi) vapor monitori*ig win be coxiductcd post-coristruction and inchi<.lc conting,ency plaiis if vapor issues arc eletected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the lxealth of clii}dren, vulnerable populations, and all conmiunity nten"ibers is ofutmost irnpoitance.

4. Accountaliiljl'y in Decision-Making:
o Irequesttl'ieestablisl'unentof';acommunityadvisoryboardtliatincludesresidents, environmental experts, aiid city officials to ovci'see the environmental aspects of tJ'ie project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in nionitoring tl'ie prqject's impae(s.

5. AdellaAve,ConcrcteBarrier(KRail)toretnaininplace:
o l strongly urge the city to keep tlie K rail closed to all traffic. Retnoving tlie K barrier will likely featl to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality.

Trequest a compreliensive air quality assessment to understand tlie potential health impacts on residents. Additiona)ly,Iactvocate for noise )evel testing to cvaluate the effects of increascd trinc flow atx! for ongoing monitoring of air ai'id noise pollution )evets if the baiarier is remo'ved. Engaging heaitli und enyironmental experts to analyze these in'ipacts is essential.

I t3$ thatyou will givc tlieseconcernstlie at(entiontliey deserve. 11 96
OPPOSITION TO 10130ADELLA PROJECT
ve o'ut!-45:yF-opl-*osingoapnpdoSc'onrrge'shpcon
l
"Pro' Below, k
changirig niy opposition:

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed repoits all past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these wiil be addressed. Specifically, I would Iike to know what tests win be conducted, whicli substances are of concern, and l'iow cleai'i-up measures wiIl cnsure soil and groundwater safety. As the Oeo l'racker does not show furffier testing done after 8/1 7/2021.

3. Ougoing Environmental Monitoring:
o } propose the establishment of a plai'i for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction aiid operational phases. This plai'i should outline how soil vaporn'ionitoringwill be conducted post-construction aiid include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at tlie t>uilding permit stage.

Protectin@the health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community rnetnbers is of utmost importance,
lierts to analyzetheseimpacts is essential.
give tliese concerns the attention tl'iey d.eserve.

Date: bl 25/,2,.<
q'b 97
OPPOSITTON TO 10130ADELLA l)ROJECT
c}ianging my opposition:

1. Coniprehensive Environmental Testing:
o I request tl'iat the developer conduct a tl'xorough Environmental impact Assessment (PIA) before tlie Project is aliprovcd. Tliis assessmentshould evaiuateall potential en'vironmental effects, inc}uding air quality, noise pollutiori, antl traffic impacts, T believethat the project should not be qualified as exeinpt under CEQA Categorical Exemp(ion tinder section 15332 (Ciass 32-1)evelopmental Projects), Approval of tlie project maxiresult in significai'it effects re)ating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o Iseekdetai}edrepoibonpastcontaminationissuesassociatedwiththeprojectsite and how lliese will be addressed Specifically, I would like to latow what (ests will be conducted, which substances ure of concern, and liow ctean-up measures wilI ensure soil and groundwater safety.As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing doi'ie after 8i'l 7/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I I:iropose the establishment of a plan for ongoin@environmental monitoring throughout the construction and opei"ationai pltases. This plait should outline how soil vapormonitoringwill be conducted post-construc.tion and inc)udecontingency plans if vapor issues are detected dtiring testing at the building permit stage.

Protectiiig the lieatth of children, vu)nerable populatioris, arid all community members is of utmost importance.

4. Accouutabflity in Decision-Making:
o I request tlie establishn'ient of a community ad'visory board that includes residents, envimiimental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmenta) aspects of tlie project. This will ens'ure accountability and provide residents with a voice in n'ionitoring the project's impacts.
polJution levets if the baiarier is removed. Engaging healtli experts to aiia}yze tliese impacts is essential.

5. Adel{a Aye. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remajn jn place:
o l strongly urge tl'ie city to keep tl'te K rail closed to all traffic. Removirsg tlie K barrier will kikely lead to increased ve}iicle emissions, further degradirig air quality.

Irequest a co:i'nprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents. AdditioriaJly, Tadvocate for noise tevel testing to evaluate tl'ie effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise and erxyiroi'tmental
l trust that you will gi've these concertts tbe at(ention they deserve.

SignatuU s )73J',,s"
Date:
1"l 98
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADFJ.,LA
el "Proyecto":). A contiiiuaci6n, he'expuesio mis razones para 6pon-erme y las solicitudes correspoxidientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustiyas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una B'valuaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exliaustiva aittes da que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe eyaluar todos }os posibles efe:ctos ambientales, incluyendo la caiidad del aire, la contaniinaci6n acuslica y los impactos en el trA-ico. Creo que e) proyecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segCin la secci6n 15332 (Cease32 - Proyectos de Desarmllo). T,a aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos signiiicatiyos en el trAfico, el ruido, }a calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. l)e no ser ast, me gustaria recibir eJ in[orme completo qxie lo demuestre.

2. Transpareneia sobre Problemas de Contnnffnaei6n:
o Busco mformesdetaiiados sobre problernas de containinaci6n anteriores asociados con cl sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordaran. Especrficamente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, curies sustancias son preocupai'ites y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarmla seguridaddel suelo>i da} aguasubterrAnea.Dado queel Geo Tracket no n'iuest'ra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s de) 17!08/202],

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o P!'opongo el establecimiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fitses de construcc'i6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detal!ar c6mo se realizara el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluirp)anes de contingencia si se detec(an problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa da permiso de construcci6n, Proteger ka satud da los nifios, las poblnciones vu!nerab)es y todos ios miembros de ta comunidad es de rnAxinia irnportancia.

4. Responsabi}itlad exi la Toma de Decisioiies:
o Solicito cl estabiecin'iientode un corme,ioasesor coinunitario que incl.uya a residentes,expe'itrisenmedioan'ibientey funcionariosde)aciudadliara supervisar Ios aspectos aa'nbientalcs del proyecto. Bsto garantizarA la rcndici6n de cuentas y brindara a 103 residentes una voz en el monitoreo cle los impactos del proyecto. 5, La barrera (jK Rail) de Adetla Ave. permanecera en su lugar:
o Uyjo ertcarecidantcnte a ia ciudad hi mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico, Levantar fa barrera del K probabtemente conducirA 21 un auniento en as emisiones de 'vehiculos, degradaiido aun mis 1:11caJidad del aire, Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la caJidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos eri Ia salud de los residentcs.Adein&s,abo@olior realizarpniebasdenivelesderuido paraevaluar Ios efectos del auinento en e) flujo de trafico y por un monitorco coritinuo de los nive}es de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta }a barrem. F,S esencia) ixivolucrar a expeitos en salud y n'iedio ambiente para analiza'r estos impactos, Conflo en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

Firina h'l-8!/''
JA'(
99 OPI)OSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I (S,Vl{(A"4Sftj-0 51:X- @(hq,orr:4 ((] <,<N% ff6ofingthe 10130Adella Project(tlie "Project")'Below, I have outlined iny reasons for opposing arid corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
c I request that tlie developer conduct a thorough Envirorunental Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. Tliis assessment should evacuatea)) potentiaf environmental effects, inctuding air quality, noise pothition, and traffic impacts. l believe tliat the project should not be qualified as exempt cii':ider CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental I)rojects). Approval of the project may res'i'ilt in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tl'iis is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive repott tliat proves the above uitrue,

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o :[seekdetaiterJlreportson liast containinationissuesassociatedwith tlie projectsite and liow these win be addressed. Specifica!ly, { would like to know what tests will be condticted, whicl'i substarices are of concem, and liow cleaii-r'ip measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sliow further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
0 } piaopose the establisbment of a plan for ongoing eawironmental monitoring tliroughout the construction aixd operationat phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wifl be condticted post-construction arid incltide contingency pla.iis if vapor iss'itcs are de(ected during testing at tl'ie building permit stage, Protecting tlie healtb of children, vulnerable populations, and all community metnbersis of utniost imliortance

4. Aecountalijlity in Decision-Making:
o I request the establisliment of a community a<tvisory board tliat includes residen(s, environmentak cxperts, and city officials to oversee tl'ie environn"iental aspects of tl'ie project, Tliis will ensureaccountabili'iyand lirovide residentswitli a voice in n'iouitoring tl'ie project's impacts.

5. AdeJ{aAve. ConcreteBarrier (K Rail) to reniain in lilnee:
o I strongly urge the city to keep tlte K rail closed to all trgffic. Removing tlie K bariier will likely lead to increased vcliicle emissions, further degrading air quality.

Irequest n compreliensive air quality assessn'iei'it to understan<l the potential healtb impacts (')11residents. Additionally,Iadvocate for noise }evel testing to evahiate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise polhitiori levels if tlie barrier is removed. Engaging health and enviranmentak experts o analyze tbese impacts is esseritial.
l tmstthat you will give these concerns the attention they deserve.

Signaltire I)ate:121z-g),=5,,
'e)\ 100
OPOSICJON AL PROYI,CTO 10230 ADELLA
Yo '-!!Q5,U3i ('AlilJr.< ........meopongoalProyectolC)130Ade!la (el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cainbiar mi oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Ambjentaies Exhaustivas:
o So}icito que el desm:rollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Anibiental (EJA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Bsta evaluaci6n debe eva}uar todos Jos posib]es efectos ainbientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acGstica v los iinpactos en el ti*fico. Creo que el proyecto no deberia caiificar como exento bajo la Hxenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segt'm la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrta tener erectos significativos en el tafico, cl ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del aHua, De 110 ser asi, me gustarfa rccibir el informe completo que lo den'iuestre,
2, Transparencxu sobre Problemas de Contaniinaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto >i c6mo seabordarAn Especfficamente,me gustaria saber que pruebas se realizarm, cuAles sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarii la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterr6nea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no inuestra piauebas adicionales realimdas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de u'i plaii para el n'ionitoreo ainbieittal continuo duraitte las fases cie consti'ucci6n y operaci6n. Este plait deLie detaJiar c6mo se realizara el monitoreo de vapor de sueto despu6s da la constt''icci6n e incluir ptanes de contiitgencia si se detectan problen"ias de vapor durante las pruebas en )a etapa de pern'iiso de construcci6n. Proteger Ja salud de los nifios, la.s poblaciones vulnerables y todos 108 n'iicmbros de ta comunidad es de mAxima imporlaitcia.

4. Responsalyi}idad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establccirnierito de cui consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ainbiente y fancionarios cie la ciudad para supervisar IOS aspectos atanbientaics det proyecto. Esto garantizarA la reiidici6n de cuentas y briiaidarA a los residentes una voz en cl monitoreo de ios impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. pennaneeer4 en su lugar:
0 Urjo encarccidarnente a la ciudad a maiitencr el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico.

Levantar la barrera dei K probablemcnte conducir6 a un aumento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradando atxn tnAs la calidad del aire. Solicito iuia eva!uaci6n iiitegral de la calidad del aire para comprender tos posibJes impactos en la salud de 108 residentcs. AdemAs, abogo por rcalizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar los cfectos de4 aumento cn el flujo de trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de 108 niveles de contan'xinaci6n de( aire y dcl ruido si se levaiita ia barrera. Es esenciak in'volucrar a expertos an salud y medio ambiente para ana)izar estos impnctos.

ConUo en que darAn a estas preocupacicines la atei'ici6n que merecen.

Firma teclldPo;zr
'5L 101
OPI)OSr{ION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I l!$2-[>)EN, MOMCA arnopposingthe tO]30Adel}aProject(the "Project") Below, I have outlined rriy reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider cliangiug my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
0 I request that tlle developer COl?ducta illOrOtlgh E]wirOlll'nental Impart ASSeSSrnent (EIA) before the Project is approved, Tliis assessment should evatuate all potential environmental effccts, including air qua)ity, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, l believe that the project shoukd not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 Class 32-Developn'iental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is rio( true, I worild like to receive tl'ie comprehexisive report tliat proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
0 I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically,J would like to know what tests will be condu'te<t, which substaitces aioeof concern, and how clean-up measges will erisure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021,

3. Ongoiiig Environmental Monitoring:
o } propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring tliroughout the constrctction aiid operationa! phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction aiid ixiclude contingency plaits if vapor ISSUESare *ietected during testing at the buiiding I:iermit. stage, I)rotecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, mid all community inembers is of almost impoitance.

4. Aecountability in Decision-Making:
o I reqt'iest tl'ie estab)isl'iment of a community advisory board tl'iat includes residents, environmental expetls, and city officials to oversee the environmentat aspects of tlte project. This will enstre account.:tbility and provide residents witb a yoicc iii monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to rcmain in place:
o I strongiy urge tiie city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier wil) likely lead to increased vchiclc emissions, further degrading air quality, I request a comprel'iensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level testing to c'valuate the e(facts of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air aiid noise I:iollution fcvcls if the barrier is removed. Rngaging lieaith aiid environinental experts to analyze these inipacts is essential
I trust Uhhity 1;lwill giye tlies,e ncertts the attention they deserve.

Signa {ire
O'5l;'>(2o25
Date:

Uo3 102
OPPOSI'l'lON TO 10130 ADELLA FROJECT
changing my opposition:

1. ComDrehensive Comprehensive Environmental I'estine: I'esting:
o l request that tlte developer conduct a tliorough Environmerttal Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environnnental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, aiid traffic impacts. l believe that the project sliould not be quatified as exempt under C[QA Categorical Exemption un&r Section 15332 (ClaSS 32-])evelopmeinta) Projects), ApprovaI of tlie project may result in significant effects re}ating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would kike to receive tlte compreliensive report tliat proves the above untue,

2. Transparency on Coiitamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issties associated with the project site and how these will be. addressed. Spectficaily,Iwould kike to know what tests will be cot'iducted, wliich substaiices are of concem, and liow c}ean-up measures will ensure soil and groriiidwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmentiil Monitoring:
o T propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout tbe construction aiid operational phases. This plaii sliould outline how soil vapor moiiiloring will be conducted post-co:iistruction and include contingency plans if vapor isst'tes arc detected during testin@ at tlie building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerable popultitions, and all community memliers is of utmost importance.

4. Accountabi)ity in Decision-Making:
o l request tlie establishment of a commt.inity advisory board that includes residents, erivironmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This wii] ensure accoiintability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in peace:
o I strongly xtrge tlie city to keep the K rail closed to ail traJ.'fic Removing the K barrier will likely Iead to increased vehicle emissions, firtlier degrading air quality.

I request a conipreliensive air quality assessment to yinderstand the potentiaJ Iiealth impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise Jevcl testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring or air and noise poitutioti }evels if tl'ie barrier is removed, Engaging health aiid en'vironmental expeits to analyze tliese impacts is essential.

I trust that you will give tliese concerns tlie attention they deserve.

Date:
103
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
!'Pro!'ot")Dl:' :,I!'o2th"'nedmlAeasonsforoppoasln"ig(panpdo:'onigtetshpeoi changing my opposition:
1, Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o Irequestt}'iatthedevetopercoxiductathoroughEnvironmentalImpactAssessme,m (EJA) before the Project is approved. This asscssmen( should evaluate a}l potential environn'ientat effects, inclutling air quality, noise pollution, aiid tra.ffic impacts. I belieye that the project should t'iot be qualified as exenipt under CEQA Categorical Excmptioii under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of tl'ie project may result iit significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or syater quatity, If tliis is not true, l would like to receive tlie comprel'iensive report that I.iroycs the above unt'rue.
2, Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek delailed reports On past contamination issues associated with tlie project site and how thesewilk be addressed.Sliecificall)i, I would like to kllOW what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concem, and l'iow clean-up measures wil) ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker CIO('Snot shoui fiirther testing done after 8/17/202 l

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring;
o l propose the estabIisl'xment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring througliout tlic construction and operational pliases. I"his plan should outline liow soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction aiid i=lude contingency plaits if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the l'iealth of children, vulnerable populations, and all community rrhembers is of utmost impoilance

4. Accountability in Decisioxi-Making:
o I request the establishment or a commiunity adyisory board tliat inchtctes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee tl'ie environinental aspects of the project. I'his will ensure accountability aiid provide residents wit.h a voice ixi monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Ade]ia Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Raii) to remain in place:
o l mongly urge tlte city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely leacl to increased vehicle emissions, f'urther degrading air qi.ialitv.

Irequest a comprehensiyc air quality assessment to understand the potential healtli impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level testing to eva.iuate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of atr and noise pollution levels if tl'xe barrier is removed. Engaging healtli and environmental experts to aiialyze tliese impacts is essential.
attention tliey deserve.
"J5-,;2':5 20,)J'
Date:
104
oposxci6s AL pnoyhc'ro hot:io ADEI,LA
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y Ias solicitudes correspoi'idientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:
]. Pruebas Anibientales Exhaustivas:
0 Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto An"ibiental (EIA) exliaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar totlos kos posib]as efectos arnbientales, incluyendo la calidad de! airc, la contaminaci6n acustica y los impactos en cl ttAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberfa calificaxo como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6riea de la CEQA, segun la secci6n 15332 (Ciase 32 - Proyectos de Desairollo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos significativos en el trAfico el ivido la calidad del aire o la calidad det agria. Dc no ser asi, me gustaria recigirel tnforme compteto que lo demuestre.

2. Transparencia solire Problemas de Contaminnci6n:
o Busco informes detatiados sobre prolilemas de containinaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6ino se abordarm. Especificamente, me gustarta saber qu6 pruebas se rcalizarAn, cufves sustaiicias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpicza aseghirarAn la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterriiea, Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionates realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Ambtental Contiriuo:
o Propongo el estableciniiento de un plai'i para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante 'ias fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Estc plcrn debe deta}Jar c6mo se rea]izarA el nionitoreo de 'vapor de sueto despu6s de la construcci6n e inchtir planes de contirigencia si se detectan problcmas de vapor drirante Jas pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6ri. l)roteger la sa}ud da los niffos, las poblaciones vuli'ierabJes y todos 10S miembros de la comunidud es de mAxima importancia.

4. Responsabiltdad en la Toma de Decisjones:
o Solicito el estabiecin'iiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio arnbiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto gamntizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a tos residentes una voz en el rmmitoreo de fos impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidanxcnte a la ciudad a maiitener el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico, Levantar la liarrera del K probablemente conducira a un aumento en las emisiones de veMculos, degradmido aun n':iAsla calidad del aire, Solicito mia evaluaci6n integral de la calidatl del aire para comprender los posibles in"ipactos an la salud de 108 tesidentes. Aden'iAs, abogo por realizar pruebas denivetes de ruido para cva}uar Jos efectos del aumento en el nuj;i de trAfico y por till monitoreo conlinuo de IOS niveles de contamiriaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levarita la barrera, F,s esencial involucrar a expertos ei'i salud y rnedio ambientc para analizar estos inipactos.

Confio en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que nierecen.

Firma
o\,= 105
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADEI,LA
oAl/]J[lN[:CSOAI meoponHoalProyectolOl30Adel!a (el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razoncs para oponeri'ne y las solicitudes correspondientes para considcrar ca.inbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientaies Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que et desarrolLador realice una B'valuaci6n de Impacto Ambienta} (ETA) exhaustiva m'ites de que se implemente euakluier unidad automatizada.Esta evaluaci6n debe evaJuar todos IOS posibles efectos ainbientaies, incluyeiido la calidad del aire, la containinaci6n act'tstica y los iii'ipactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberfa calificar como cxerito bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtyiylasecci6nl5332 (Clase32 - Proyectosde Desarrollo).Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la caiidad dcl aire o la calidad del agua. De lThOser asf, me gustarfa recibir el informe completo que to dcmuestre.

2. Transparcncaa sobre Prob!emas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detal!ados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del liroyecto y c6mo se abordaran. Espec{ficamentc, me gi'istaria saber qri6 pruebas se realizarAn, cuAIes sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las n'iedidas de limpieza asegurarii la seguridad del suelo y dej agua subterr{ii'iea. Dado que cl Geo Tracker no muestra pmebas adiciona)es rea]izadas despu6s del l 7/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el estabtecimientotle tin Plan para cl monitoreo arnbicntal continuo durante las fases dc construcci6n y operaci6n- Este plaii debe detallar c6mo se reaiizaraet moyiitoreodevalior dc suelodespu6s de ia consirucci6n eincluir planes de contingencia si se detecteu'i prob]emas de vapor durante )as pruebas eii la etapa de liermiso de construcci6n. Protcger Ja salud de los ninos, kas poblaciones vulnerables y todos lO.'3miembros de la comunidad es de rnAxima importancia.

4. Responsaliilidad eu la 'l'omii de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un coxisejo asesor comunitario que inchiya a residentes, expe:itos en medio ambiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar 10S aspectos ambientales del proyecto, Rsto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuei'itas y brindarA a los residentes una sro:zen el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. Lm lyarrera (K Rai}) de Adellu Ave. permaxiecerffi en su Iugar:
o Urjo encarectdaniente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trafico, Levantar la barrera del K probablemente coiiducirA a un aumento en las emisiones <(e vehfcuios, degradando aun mThs la ca!idad dei airc. Solicito una evaIuaci6n intcgral de la ca}idad del aire pcira compreiider Ios posibles impactos en la salad de 108 residentes. AdcmAs, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles de ntido paraevaluar los efectos del auinento en el flujo de trAfico y pot un monitoreo continuo de los niveJes de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera. us esencial irivolucrar a expertos en saluti y medio ambiente para analizar estos in'ipactos.

Conffo an que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atcnci6n que merecen.

Firma Feclia
%'1 106
OPPOSTTION TO 101.30 ADELLA PROJECT
I /- nif //c-,q S/) /,,i r7sr> b ainopposingthe10130AdellaProject(the "Project")Below, l Iiave outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o r request tl'iat tlie deyeloper cond'itct a thorough Environ'inenta) Ix'npactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessrrxentsliould evaluate al) potentiak environmental effects, including air qiality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe tliat tbe project sliould iiot be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmerita) Projects). Approyal of the project may result in significaiit effects relating to traffic, noise, air qtiality, or wiaterquality.Jf thisis nottrue,[ wouldlilceto receivethecomprehensiverel:iort that proves the above unhaue.

2. Transliareney onContaminationIssues:
o l seek detailed reports 011past contamination iSSuesassociated with tlie project site and l'iow these will be addressed, Specifically, I would like to l<now what tests wi)I be conducted, wliich substances are of concern, and how cleaii-up measures wi}I ensure soil and groundwater safety. As tl'ie Geo Tracker does not show furtber testing done afl:er 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o l propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environntenlal monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases. This plan shorild outline how soil vapor monitoririg will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if v.:tpor iSSues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting tlie liealth of childreii, vulnerabic populations, and all conununity members is of citn'iost importance,

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o k request the establishment of a community advisory board tl'tat includes residents, environmemal experts, and city officials to oversee tlie environmental aspects of the project. ".['liis will ensure accountability and provide residents witl'i a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Bariier (K Rail) to remain in peace:
o [ strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to ail traffic, Removing the K l>arrier wiil lilcel>i lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality.

I request a comprehensive air qua}ity assessment to 11nderstaiid the potentia! }icalth impacts on residents, Additiorratly, I advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow aixd for ongoiiig monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging lieattli and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

Itnist tl'iat you will giye these concerns the attention (l'iey deserveSignature Dare:
,F/,).5/;/VIS
path 107
OPPOSITI(N TO 10130 ADELLA I)ROJECT
changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmantal Testing:
o IrequestthattliedeveloperconductatlioroughEnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. Tliis assessment should evaluate all potentiat environmental effects, including Thr quality, noise polfution, and traffic impacts. i believe tliat the project should iiot be qualified as exempt under CHQA Categorical Exemption utxder sectio.i'x 15332 ((]ass 32-Developmentat Projects), Approval of the project may result in significant effects reiating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, l worild like to receive the comprehensive repori that proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency oii Contamination Isgues:
0 I seek detailed reports on past coiitamination issues associated with the pro,ject site and hour these will be addressed. Speci&atly, I would like to laiow what tests wit) be conducted, wbich substances are or concern, and how cleaii-up measures will ensure soil and grouidwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sliow further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
c T propose the establishn'ient of a plari for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational pliases, This plan should outline liow soil vapor moititoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during teslin@ at the building permit stage.

Protecting tJ"iehealth of chitdren, vulnerabie liopulations, and ail community members is of utn'xost importance.

4. Accountabil*ty in Decision-Making:
o I request the estabJisliinent of a con'imuni(:y advisory boaiad that includes residents, environmental expetts, ax"idcity officials to oversee t)ie environmental aspects of tlie project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrter (K Raij) to remain in place:
o l strongly xirge the city to keep tl'ie K rail closed to ali traffic. Remoying the I( barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle exnissioiis, firther degrading air quality. 'l request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand tlie potential health impac.ts on residents. Additionally, l advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Bngaging healtl'i and environmentat experts to aiialyze tbese iinpacts is essential.
l trust wijl give these concerns tl'ie attention tliey deserve.

Sigi'iapfre @3gl23/;ie 2G"
108
OPOSICTON AL PROYECTO lOi30 ,ADELI,A
// /
l
(el "Proyecfo"). A contimraci6n,he expriesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Amliieutales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de impacto Ambicntai (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaJuar todos }os posibles efectos arnbientales, incluyendo la cali.dad del aire, la contaminaci6n acristica v los inipactos en cl trAfico, Creo que el proyecto yio deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de ta CHQA, segun la secci6nl5332 C}ase 32 - I)royectos de Desarrollo) T,a aprolyaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos significativos cn el tr6fico, e) ruido, la caiidad del aire o la ca)idad del agua, De no ser asf, me gustarJa recibir e) informe completo que lo dernuestre,

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Co'ntaminaci6n:
o Busco in[ormes detatlados sobre problernas da contaminaci6n aiitcriores asociados con eJ sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificamente, me gustaria saber que pruebas se realizarAn, ctffles sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo ias n'iedidas de limpieza asegurari la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrica. Dado que el Geo Tracker !10 muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Atnbiental Continuo:
o Propongo cl establecimiento dc un plan para el monitoreo ambienta} contiriuo durante Jas fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detaliar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de vaporde suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e inc)uir plaiies de
de contingenciasi sedetectanproblernasde vapor durantclas liruebasen la etapa permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los niffos, tas poblaciones vulr'ierables y todos los miembros de la cormuiidad es de maxima importancia,

4. Responsabjlidad en lsi Toma de Decisiones:
o SoJicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que inclnya a residentes, expertos en medio ambientc v funcionarios de la ciudad para supei'visar }os aspectos ainbientales del proyecto. fisto garantizara !a rendici6ii de cuentas y brindaraa losresidentesunavoz enel monitoreode los imliactosdcl proyecto. 5, La barrera (K Ruin) de Adella Ave. permaxiecerA an su }ugar:
c Urjo encayecidamente a la ciudad a i'i'iantener el K rail cerratlo a todo trafico. I,evatitar la barrera del K probablemetite conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradando aun mAs la calida<1 del aire. So}icito una evaluaci6n integraJ de la calidad det aire para comprender ]os posiblcs impactos en la salud tie los rcsidentes. Adertrls, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar los el'ectos del aumenlo en el fl.u.jo da trAfico y por lm monitoreo continuo de los niveles da contarninaci6n del aire y del ruido si se ievaxita IEI barrera, Es esencial involucrar a experLos cn saZud y medio axnbiente para analizar estos impactos.

ConfJo exi que dnrAn a estas preocupaciones la a[enci6n que n'ierecen. (,Alllna.a.' 3= ,,C ,,7 -LOrJ,S-.}
Fecha
olO 109
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
YO (Aye\soy,y O ( l"ct meopongoalProyecto 10130Adella
(e)"Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis raz,ones para oponcrme y las soticitudes correspondientes para considerar canibiar mi oposici6n:

1. Priiebas Ambientales Exlinustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una F,valuaci6n dc lmpacto Ambiental (BIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemcntc cualquier unidad auton'iatizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos 10S posibtes efectos ainbientales, iricluyendo la calidad dci airc, la contaminaci6n acustica y Jos impactos en el tr,:ifico, Creo que el proyecto no deberta calificar como exento baio la IIExenci6nCateg6rica de la CEQA, segi:m la secci6ii 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podria tei'ier efectos significativos en ei trAfico, cl ruido, la calidad del aire o ta ca}ic'tad del agua. De no ser ast, me gustaria recibir el informe complelo que ko demuestre.

2. Transparancia sobre Probjemas de Coxitstminaci6n:
o Busco infoitnes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especfficarnente, me gustarfa sabe,r qu6 prtiebas se realizarAn, cuales sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterriyea. Dado que ei Geo Tracker no mrtcsti'a pruebas adicionales realiz.adas despu6s del 17/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Ainbiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecin'iierito de un plait para el n'ionitoreo an':ibiental continuo durante las fases de constnicci6n y operaci6ri. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizatTh cl monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes cle conti.ngencia si se detecta'n problcmas de vapor durante las pruebas en la ctapa de pe'rmiso de construcci6n. Protegcr la salud c'te }os niffos, Jas poblaciones vulnerat'iles y todos los miembros de la comunidad as de maxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en is Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un conse,jo asesor comunitario que ind'uya a residcntes, expertos en medio arnbiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar 108 aspectosambientalesdel liroyecto. Esto garantizarAta rendici6n de cuemasy t+rindara a los residcntes uia voz en el rnonitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella A\e* permnnecert en su lugar:
o Urjo enctirecidainente a )a ciudad a maiiterher el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico.

Levantar la barrera del K probabiemente conducir..i a un aurnento en lag emisiories de yehiculos, degradando arm robs la calidad del aire, Solici.to 11na evaluaci6n integral de )a calidad del aire para comprender ios posibfes impactos en la salud de los residentes. Adam's, abogo por realizar pruebas de nivcles dc ruido para evaluar Jos ef'ectos del aumeiito en el flujo de trafico y por uri monitoreo continuo de }os nive}es de contai'ninaci6n del aire y del ruido si se Jevanta la barrera. Es esencia] invo)ucrar a experlosen siuud>rmedioainbienteparaanalizar estosimpactos.

Conlio en que daran a estas prcocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

Firma Feclia 3/7,'=/2,S
110
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELI.,A
Yo V7bba ! (l!qy=,.;=,- meopon@oalProyectolOl30Adel)a (el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y }as solicitudes correspondientes para considerar camliiar ini oposici6n:

1. I)ruebas Ambienta}es Exhaiistivits:
o So[icito que el desarrotlador realice una Eyaluaci6n de Ixnpac.to Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que sei implemente cualqriier unidad aritomatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos Jos posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidact del aire, la contanxinaci6n acustica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no debcrfa cali'ficar como exento ba3o!a Exenci6n C.ateg6ricadc la CEQA, segun ia secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - I)royectos de Desarrollo), Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significatiyos en el trAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o Ja calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustaria recibir el informe completo que to demuestre.

2. Transparencia so[ire I)rob]emas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detailados sobre probiemas de contaminaci6n ai'iteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordari"i. Especfficainente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, curies sustancias Sell preocupantes y c6rno Jas medidas de ?impieza asegurari la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrmea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas dcspu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Coiitiriuo:
o i)roponBo el establecin'iientode un lilan 'l:iarael n'ionitoreo arnbiental continuo duraixte tas fases de construcci6n y operaci6ri. Este plan debe detallar C6fflO se realizarffi el inonitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la constrcicci6n e ineluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la sa)lid de kos niffos, las poblacioxies vulnerables y todos los miernbros de la comunidad es de rnAxima importancia, 4, Responsabiiidad en ia Toma de I)ecisiones:
o Solicito el establccimiento de t.m consejo asesor cornunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los asliectos ambienta!csdei proyecto.Esto garanttzarAla rexidici6nde cuentasy brindara a 108 resicfentes una voz en cJ monitoreo de los in':ipactos del proyecto.

5. La bhrrera (K Raii) de Adella Ave. permatiecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidai'nente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cen:ado a todo trafico.

Levantar Ja barrera del K probablemente conducirA a xm aumento en las emisiones de ychJculos, degradai'ido aun mis ta catidad del aire. Solicito una evaltiaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para compreiidcr los posibles impactos en la safud de Ios residcntes, AdemAs, abogo por realizar prueba.q de ni'vcles de :ruido para evaluar los efectos del auniento cn el flujo de trAfico y por un monitoreo contiiirio de los niveles de contarninaci6n de'l aire y del ruido si se )evaitta la barrera. Es esencia} involucrtua a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para aiializar estos impactos, Coniio en que dari'i a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

Fecha
q7,- 111
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I \J3(cri<1 %h'ri'(\-o an"iopposingthe 10130AdellaProject(the "Project") Below, I have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider chaiiging my opposition:

1. Comprehenstve Environmenta} Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise potlution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exetnpt under CEQA Categoricai Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta) Projects). Approval of the project may result in significAnt effects re)ating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If this is not truc, L would iike to receive the coinprehensive report that proves the above untrue.
2, Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specificalty, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, whicli substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not styow further testing done after 8/t7/202 1.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the estab)isliment of a plan for ongoing environmental n'ionitoring tliroughout tlie construction and operational phases. ]"his plaii shou{d outline how soi!t vapor monitoring will be conducted post-coiistruction and include cotitingency pians if vapor iSSues are detected during testing at the buiMin@ permit stage.

Protecting the heattlt of children, vuinerable populations, and all coxnmunity members is of utmost importaiice.

4. Accouiitability in Deejsion-Making:
o I request the estabAishinent of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmentat expeits, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the pro,ject. This will ensure accountability and provide residents witl'i a yoice in monitoring the project's in'tpac(s.

5. AdeIla Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K raii closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions> further degrading air quality.

Irequest a comprehensive air quality assessment to uriderstand the potentiai health impacts on residents. AdditionaliyJadvocate for noise level testing to eva}uate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environn'iental expem to analyzc these impacts is essential.
r trust that yort will give these concerns the attention they deserve8i\natreQ(kl Date:3 }a!' /a5 01'} 112
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I%-(-CO-===i-amopposingthel0130AdellaProject(tbe "l'roject")Below, I have ouHi3my reasons foropposingand corresponding requeststo consider changing my opposition:

1. Coiuphacltcrxsivt Coiui>hacltcrxsivt Environmenta] Environmenta] Testing: Testing:
o hequestthatthedeveloperconductatlioroughEnvirornnentalrmpactAssessment (F,IA) before the Project is approved. This assnient should evacuate all potential environmental effects, inchiding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorica! Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Deve}opmenta! Projects), Approval of theprojectmayresultin significanteffectsrelatinB to taffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would iike to receive the comprehensive report tl'iat proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports 011past contaminatioxi issues associated with the project sjte and liow these will be addressed. Specifically, I would }ike to know what tests wili be conducted, wliich substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soiJ and groundwater safety. As tI'ie Geo Tracker does not show ftuther testing done after 8/17/2022.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plaii for ongoing environmental monitoring througbotit tbe construction an<l operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-constructioi'i and include contingency plaits if vapor issues are detected duriiig testing at the buiiding pemiit stage.

Protecting the health of cliildren, vulnerable populations, arxd ail community meinbers is of utmogt importance

4. Aecountabi]ity in Decision-Malcing:
o Trequest the cstablishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This wili ensure accoun €ability and provide residents with a yoice in monitoring the project's in'ipacts.

5. AdellaAve.ConereteBarrier(KRail)toremaininp}ace:
o 'f strongly urge the city to keep tlie K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to iricreased ve}iicle en"iissioris, fuither degrading air quality.

I requast a comprelienSive air quaJity assessment to understand the potential heaith impacts on residents. Additionally, Indvocate for rioise level testing to evaluate tlie effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging liealth and environmental expeits to analyze these in'tpacts is essential.

Sigiiature Do3!,tl%a51%
113
oposict6s.xx, PROYECTO ioi.so ADELLA
(el
yo,,'o\.erncs <'Proyecto"). A
(;yry7cllez , meopongoalProyectolOl30Adella continuacion, he expue!to mis razones para oponermc y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cainbiar mi oposici6n:
1, Pruehas Ambient:ales Exhhustivas:
o Solicito que el dcsarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exliaustiva anles de qi.te se implcmente cua!quier unidad ai.domatizada, Esta evaluaci6ri debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos anibientales, incluyendo la caiidad del aire, (a co'ii(.aminaci6n acnstica y los impactos en el trico. Creo que ei proyecto no deberfa cali.ficar como exento bajo ia Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segun la secci6ni5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrolio). I,a aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el trafico, eJ mido, )a calidad del airc o la cali<lad del agua, De no ser asf, ine gustaria recibir el informe completo que lo dexnuestre,

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contiuninaci6n:
o Busco infori'nes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n antcriores asoci:ados con el sitio de) proyecto y c6mo se abordarii. Espccfficarnente, n"ie gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se rcaiizaran, curies sustai'xcias son preocupantes y C6J110las me.didas de iin'ipieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y del agtia subterrmea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales reakizadas despu6s de) }7!08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plaii para ei moriiloreo ambiental continuo durante las fivses de. construcci6n y operaci6n, Este ptait dcbe detallar c6n'io se realizar6 el monitoreo de vapor de sue]o despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas da vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa dc permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los niiios, tas pob)aciones vuliierables y todos los mten'tbros da la comunidad es de mAxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito cl establecimiento de un consejo asesoia comunitario que incluya a resiclentes,expertos en incdio ambientey funcionarios de la ciudad liara supervisar los aspectos ainbienlales de) proyecto. Hsto garantizar4 la rendici6n de cuentas y brixidarA a los residentes una VOZ en el moriitoreo de los impactos del proyecto. 5, La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o U'rjo encarecidainente a la cicidad a niai'ztener el K rail cerrado a todo (rMfico.

Levaiitar la barreradel K lirobablsmente conductra a i:in aun'ientocn }asemisiones tie vehiculos, degradai'ido aun tnAs la cakidad dci aire. SoliciLo una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos en la salud <le los rcsidentes. Ademas, abogo por reaJizar pn.iebas de nivelcs de mido para evatuar los efectos del aumcnto en cl flujo de lrafico y Boorun monitoreo continuo de ios niveies de contamii'iaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levaixta la barrera. Us esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y niediri ambiente para axia}izar estos impactos.

Conflo en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6ri que merecen.

C).5= 2r- ?-'S
Feclia
114
OPOSIC}6N AI, PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(eI
Yo
"Proyecto"),
>A'na&\\xn
A conJf'ua':i'm, l
be
meopongoalProyecto10130Adelia
correspondieiites
expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las soiicitudes para cortsiderar cambiar mi oposici6n:

I. Priiebas Ambientales Exliaustivas:
o Solicito que el c[esarroltador realice rma Bvaluaci6i'i de Impacto Ambierital (EJA) exhaxistiya evaluaci6n
antes de que se impleimente cualqriier unidad a'utomatizada. Esta debe evaluar todos Jos posibles efectos ambientales, caJidad inciuyendo la proyecto
del aire, la contaminaci6n ac<tstica y los impactos en el tmfico. Creo que e} CEQA,
no deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la seg;6n ia secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 -Proyectos de Desarrollo). T.,aaprobaci6n aire
del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en e{ tAfico, el ruido, la calidad del que
o la calidad del agua. De no ser ash, me gustaria recibir el informs completo lo demuesttae.

2. Transpareneia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6ii:
o Busco inforrnes detallados sobre problemas de containiiiaci6n anteriores asociados con qu6
el sitio dei proyecto y c6mo se abordari. Especfficamente, me gustarta saber pruebas se realizaran, cuAIes sustai'icias son preocupaiites y c6'ino las n"iedidas Geo
de liinpieza aseguraran la segutidad del suelo y dei agua subterrAnea. Dado que el '!'racker iio mtiestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despt'i6s dcl !7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
0 Propongo el establecimiento de rm plan para el n':io:i'iitoreo ambiental coixtinuo realizarA
durante las fases de conslrucci6n y operaci6n. Este p!ax't debe detallar c6mo se el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de !a construcci6n e irxc)uir pianes de
de contingcncia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante )as pruebas en la etapa permiso de construcci6n. Proteger ta salud de Ios niitos, Ias polrtaciones vulncrables y todos los miembros de la con"iunidad es dc maxima importancia. 4, Responsidiilidad en la Toma tle Deeisiones:
o
residentes,
Solicito cl estalilecimiento de ui'i consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a expertos en medio ambiente y futicionarios de la ciudad para supervisma !os lyriiidarA
aspectos ambientales det proyecto. Esto garantizarA la. rendici6n de cuermts y a los residentcs una VOZ On el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. LD barrera (l( Ribil) Ne Adel]a Aye. perrnrtnecerA an su lugar:
o Urjo encai:ecidantente a 3a ciudad a mantcner el K rctil cerrado a todo ttAfico. Levantar la tiarrera del I< probablemente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradaxicto akin mis la calidad del airc. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la culidad del airc para comprender IOSposibles impactos en ta saiud de 105 los
residentes.
efectos del
AdemAs,
aumento
abogoporrealizarlirucbas denivelesdc ruidooaraevaluar
niyeles
en el flujo de trafico y p<yr till monitoreo contimto de 105 de contaminaci6n ctel atre y del ruido si se ke,'vcmm la barrera. Es esencial in'volucrar a expertos en sa)ud y ineaio ainbiente para ai'ializar estos impactos.

Confio en que darAri a estas preocupacioiies la atenci6n q'ae mcrecen, Firm'a rf, l,:l'i - ? 0 Z ,5" ,
Fccliti
115
OPP0Sl'll0N IO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
I dQ%yq 'Jffl% amopposingthelO130AdellaProject(the
l'Project") Belog I have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Enviromnental Testing:
o Irequestthatthedeveloperconductathorou@hHnvironmentallmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential enyironrnental effects, including air quality, noise poUution, and traffic im.pacts. I believe tliat the projeci should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section J5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in sigiiificant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Tf this is not true, I would }ike to receiye the comprehensive re;port that proves tl'ie above untrue.
2, Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o l seek detailed reports on past contamirxation issues associated with the project site aiid how these will be addressed. Specifically, J would like to l<now what tests wit} be conducted, whic't'i substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and grouridwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show furtlier testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongomg Environnnental Monitoring:
o I propose tlie establisl'iment of a plan for ongoit'ig environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operaional phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wili be conducted post-construclion and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the hea]th of cliildren, vulnerable populations, aiid all corrirnunity members is of utmost importaiice,

4. Accountability iii Dceision=Mnt<ing:
o I request the establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, enviroental experts, arid city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This will ensure accountability aiid provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (.K Rajl) to rematn in place:
o l strongly urge tlie city to keep the K rail c]osed to a)l traffic, Removing the K bariier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, finther degrading air qtia}ity.

I request a comprehensive air quality assessmentto understand the potential health impacts on residents, Additionally, I advocate for noise level testingto evaluate tlie effects of increased traffic ilow ax"rd for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution leveJs if the barrier is removed. Hngaging health aiid environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

I trust that you will give these
Signature
the attention they deserve,
3 }z-y Jyoqs
Date:
116
0PPOSIII01% TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
clianging my opposition:

1. Comprebensive Environmental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate alt potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the phoject should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categotical Exemptioii under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in siHnificarit effectsrelating to tmffic, noise,air quality, or water quality, If tliis is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the ahove mtnie.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
c I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. 8pecifica}}y, I would like to know whattests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, aiid how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Traclcer does not show ftuther testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishmeiit of a plan for ongoing environinental monitorin@ througltout the constt'uction aiid operational phases. This p]an sliould outline how soil vapormonitoring wiil beconducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testiiig at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, 'vulnerabie populations, and ali community members is of utmost importaixce.

4. Accountability in Decision-Mnking:
o T taequest tlie establishment of a commuriity advisory board that i'ncludes resiclents, environxnental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRail)toiaemaiuinplace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep tbe K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to ixicreased vehicle e.i'nissions, furiher degrading air quality. rrequest a comprehensive air quaiity assessment to understand the potential health in'ipacts on residents, Additiona}ty, I advocate for noise kevel testing to evaiuate tlie effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoiing of atr arid noise .pollution Levels if the baiiier is removed Engaging heaitl'i and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
l trust that you will give these concerns the attention they deserve.

Signature 4,-=- Date:
117
OPPOSJIION TO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
I % 'M(2nH amopposingthelOi30Ade)iaProject(the
"Proiect") Below, I have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

L Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveioperconductathoroughEnvironinentaflmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approyed. This assessment should evaluate al! potential environmental effects, including air quality, xioise pol)ution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project s]touM not be qrialified as exempt under CEQA Categoiical Exemption under section 15332 (Ciass 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the prqject may result in significai'it effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above intrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past containination issues associated witl'i the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically,Iwoukd lilce to laiow what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures ivill ensure soil aixd groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show furtlier testing done after 8/1 7/2021,

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establisliment of a plan for oxigoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction ai'id operatio'nal phases. This plan should outline how soil vapormonitoring wil} be conducted post-construction m'id ii'iclude contingency plans if vapor ISSUESare detected during testing at tl'ie building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerable popuiations, and all community members is of utmost imporlaiice

4. Aecountability in Decision-Making:
o I request the establishment of a community advisory board tliat iiicludes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the projectas in'ipacts,

5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRai})toremaininplpce:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to ail traffic. Removing the K barricrwill likely lead to increascdvehicle emissions, further degrading air quality.

I request';acomptehensive air quality assessnnentto understaiid tI'ie potential liealth impacts on i:esidents, Additionally, I advocate for noise tevel testingto evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poUution levels if the barrier is removed. Bngaging health atid environmental experts to analyze tliese impacts is essei'itial.

Itrust ou will give these concerns the attention tl'iey deserve.

Date:
'2,1>-1%30,!6'
118
OPPOSITION TO 20230 ADELLA PRO,TF,CT
I '314 am opposing the 10130 Adella Project (the
"Project") Belo , I have outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to corisider changing my opposition:

1. Co:mprehensive Envirorunental Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Enviromnental }mpact Assessment (B!A) before theProjectis aliproved. Tlffs assessmentshouidevaluateal) potential envirormental effects, includiiig air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, I belieye tlxat the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental ProjecU). Approval of theproject may result in si@xiificant effectsrelating to traffic, noise,air quality, or .water quality, If this is not t'nxe, I svoukl like to receive tlie comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past containination issues associated with the project site aiid liow these will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to laiow what tests wUl be condttcted, which substances are of concem, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Enviroiirnental Monitoring:
o T proposc the establishment of a plan for ongoing enviroi'imei'ital monitoring througl'iout the consruction arid operational phases. This plan should outline how soil vapormonitoring wilI be coitducted post-consttuctionand include contirigency plans if mpor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the liealth of children, vulnerable populations, and all conaxmunity members is of utmost importance.

4. Aecountiibility in Decision-Making:
o l request the establishn'ient of a community acivisory board that includes residcnts, environniental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accotu'itability and provide residents witti a voice in monitoring the project's i;i'ipacts,

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in piaee:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K raiJ closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier wili Jikely lead to iricreased vehicle emissions, further degrading airquality.

I request a con'ipreliensive air quatity assessmentto understand the potential health impac'ts onresidents. Additionally, I advocate fornotse }evel testingto evaluatethe effects of increasedtraffic flow and for ongoing monitorinz of air and noise pollution levels if the b is removed. En@aging l'iealth and enyironmental to analyze impacts is essential.

I trusat yo ncerns tlie attention they deserve.

Date:
to0 119
OPPOSJTIONTO 10130AI)ELLAPROJECT
S \( amopposingthe10130AdellaProject(tlie
changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmenta) Testing:
o trequestthatthedevelopercoti.ductathorotighErrvironxnentatlmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should eva]uate all potential envimnmentak effects, inc!uding air quality, noise potlution, and traffic impacts, r believe that the project should :iiot be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exeniption urider section 15332 (Class 32-Developrriental Projects), Appro'val of tlie project may result in signi'&ant effects relating to traffic, rioise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would !ike to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.
2, Taaansparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specificalky, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and IIOWclean-up measures w'll ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sliow further testing done after 8/1 7/202 1.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for oxigoing environmei'ital monitoriiig throughout the cotstruction and operational phases. This plan should outline ltow soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and incIude contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the buitding permit stage, Protecting tl'ie health of children, vuknerable populations, and ail comtnunity members is of utmost impoiiance,

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o Itcquestlheestabiishrnentofacommunityadvisoryboardthatincludesresidenis, envimnrnental experts, aitd city officials to oversee the environrnental aspects of the project, This will ensure accouiitability and proyide residents with a voice iri monitoring the project's in'ipacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Raid) to remain in place:
o I strongiy urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic, Removing the K baitier will likety ieadto increased vehicle emissions, :f'urlher degrading air quality.

Irequest a contprehensive air quality assessment to understand tl'ie potential health impacts on residents, Additionauy, r advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the affects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoririg of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed, Bngaging liealth and environnnental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
ou will give these concerns the attention
Signature
They deserve,
Date:
tel 120
opos'icx6x AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el
Yo"Proyector'). (;'onr>a
A
g
coen'4'uaci6n, e Gbrt:rc7'i,os. meopongoalProyectolOl30Adella lte expuesto x'n'israzones para opoi'xerme y las soIicitudes corregpondientes para consider! cambiar rrii oposici6n:

1. Pruebas ArnbientaJes Exhatistivas:
o Solicito que el desarroilador reaiice ',ina Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambientai (EIA). exhausti'va antes de que se implexnente cua2quier unidad autotriatizada. Bsta evaiuaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, iriciuyendo la calidad del aire, la contamiriaci6n act'islica y kos impactos en el trAfico. Crco que e! proyecto CEQA,
no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6xi Categ6rica de la segun la se<x,i6nl5332 (Clasc 32-Proyectos de Desarrolio). Laaprobaci6n aire
cielproyecto
o la calidad
portrfatenerefectossiBrii:ficatiyosenel trMfico,el ruido, la calidadde) del agua. Dc no ser asri, me gustarfa rccibir el informe coi:npteto que to demuestre.

2. 'I'ransparencia sobre ProbJemas de Contamtnaci6n':
o Busco infon'nes deta}lados sobre problemas de containinaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordaran. Especfficaxnente, me gustar!a sabe,r qu6 pit'iebas se realizarAn, cuAles sustancias son preocupantes )i c6mo las medidas Geo
de limpieza asegararAn la segtu:idad del suelo y dcl agua subterriiea, Dado quc el Tracker no muesti'a pruebas adicionales reatizadas despu6s del l 7/08/202'?.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el estableicimiento de un plan para el monitoreo antbiental continuo duraiite ias fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizart el moiiitoreo de vapor ae suelo despots tte Ia construcci6n e incluir planes rie contingencia si se detectaxi prriblemas de vapor duraiite las pruel:+as en )a etapa de permise de construcci(yn.Proteger la salud de los nif'ios, )as lioblaciones yulnerables y todos los miembros da la comunidad es de maxima in"iportaiicia,

4. Responsabilidml eri la Toma de Decisiones:
o SoIicito el establecimiento de 'un consejo asesor comunitaiaio que iiicluya a residentes, expertos en medio ainbiente y furicionarios de ).aciurlad para supervisar 103 brindarA
gpectos an'ibientales del proyecto, Esto garamizarA la rci'idici6t't de cpentas y a loS residentes una yoz an eJ aionitorec de 103 impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave, permsnecer6 en su lugar:
o Uijo encarecidamente a la ciu6ad a maiitener el K rail cerrado a todo tr6iico. tevantar }a barrera ae)K probablemei'tte ccnducirA a uii auniento en las emisiones de velticulos, degradando a(ui mAs Ia calidad clel aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n iiitcgral de la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos (E!11la salud <le los residentes, AdemAs, abogo por realizar pruebas dc riiveles de raido para e-val'iar los efectos del aumento ext el fltjo de trAfico y pt,yr un monitoreo c.ontinuo de los i"iiveies tie contamiriaci6n dcl aire y del ruiclo si se levanta la barrera. ES esenciai involucrar a expertos eri. salud y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos, Conffo en que darAa a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

Fecha
121
OPPOSmON 'I'O }0130 ADELLA PROJECT
"Project") Below, I iiave outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

L Con'xprehensive Environmental Testing:
o IrcquestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentalIn'ipactAssessrnerit (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment sliould evaluate all potential environmental ef.fccts, inctudin(g air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. K believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA C,'ategorical Exemption under sec't'ori 15332 (Class 32-Developmental })rojects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to tr'affic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not'true, I would }ike to receive the comprehensive repo,tt that proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Containiriatnorx Nssues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated w'th the project site aitd how these wikl be addressed. Specifically, i wo'uld Iike to know what tests will lye conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up n'ieasures'will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show futther testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing FatvnyonmeutaN M[onuitoying:
o i propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environinental monitoring throughout t}ie construclion and operationa! phases. I'his plan should outline how soil vaporrnonitoring will be conducted post-constructioti arid include contingency plans if vapor issues tire detected during testing at the building permit stage, Pmtecting the health of children, vinerable poliulations, and all community metnbers is ofutmost iniportai'ice,

4. AceouintabNuity in Decision-:akixg:
0 I request the cstablishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environtnental expezts, and city officials to oversee the envirorxmental aspects of the project. 'n'iis will ensire accountability aiid provide residents witl'i a voice in moitoring the project's impacts.

5. Ade4!ia Ave. Concrete Barrieio (K RaiN) lo rexnain in peace:
o I strongly urge tlie city to keep the K rail closed to all trafiic. Removing the K barrierwiil likely leadto increasedvehicleemissions,further d.egradinB air quality. l request a comprehensive air quality assessmcntto understaxtd (he potential health impacts onresidents. Additioiial)y,Taelvocate for xioise levcl testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoixig monitoriiig of air and noise pollution leyels if the barrier is removed. Engagii'ig healtb aiid en'vironmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
l that O'Llwil} give tliese concerns the attention they deserve.

Date:
-------TU3 -122
OPPOSJTION TO 20130 ADELLA PRO,TECT
changing my opposition:

Compreheaxsive Environrneiutal Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironirientalImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate a!l potential enviromnental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CBQACategorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of the project may resu}t in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quaiity. if this is not true, I mouldlike to receive the comprehensive report that proves tlie above untrue,

2. 'f'anspareney ori Contamijnation Nssuesi
o I seek detailed reporLs on past contamination issues aSsociatC'dwith the ptoject site and howthese will be addressed. Specificaily, I woyild like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures'will ensure soi! and groundwater safety. AS the Oco Traclcer does not show Airther testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. OuugoixngEnvflronxnentan Monffitoying:
o T propose the estabiislimen[ of a plan for ongoing enviroimental monitoring throughout the construction aiid operational phases. This p}an should out!iyie how soil vapormonitoring will be conductedpost-constructioxi and include contingency plans if vapor ISSUESus detected during testing at the building pcrn':iit stage, Protecting the health of children, vulncrable populations, and all commtmity members is of'utinost importance.
4, AeeountabNRity AnDeeision-Making:
o I request the establishment of a coirnntinity advisory board that includes residents, environn'ienta[ expexts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents wish a voicc in monitoriiig tl'ie project's impacts.

5. Adelaa Ave. Coxierete Baaarier (K Rail) to remain fin place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to iiicreased velxicle emissions, J.aur(:herdegradi'iig air quality, I request a comprehensive air quality assessxnentto understandtlxc pc+tential heallh impacts on residents. Additionafly, { adyoca:te for rioise level testi'i'ig to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing mouitorixig of air an.d noise .pollution levels if the barrier is removed.. Engaging health aitd envimnmental experts to analyze tliese impacts is essential.
the attention they deserve.

Da(e:
(oq 123
OPPOSNT!ON TO 20130 ADELLA PRO,TECT
changing my opposition:

L CompreTheansive ComnreTheansive Environmentau Environmentau Testu:ig:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductatlioroughEnvironmentatJmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessme,ntshould evaluate ail potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. 1 beiieve that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption iuider scc'tion 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approvai of the projectmayresultin significaixteffectsrclatin@ to tjaffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If t's is not tiaue,I would lilce to receive tl'ie comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.

2. Tt'anspareney ori Contamination 'Nssnes:
0 r seelcdetailed reports on past contamination issues associated wi(h the project site and how these wili be ad:lressed. Speeifically, I would like to l(IIOW what tcsts wili be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and gro'indwater saf'ety. As tlie Geo Tracker does not show further testing do:iie af'er 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing EnvjyonnaenUI Monfieoyfing:
o :[ propose the establishme:ixt of a plan Cor ongoing environmental monitoring throughou the cortstruction attd operational phases. 'This p!air shoukl outlirie how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-constmction and include contingericy lil'ans if vapor iss'ueS arc detected during testing at the bui]ding permit stage, I)rotecting the he<ilth of children, vulnerable populations, and all commtity members is of'utmost importance.

4. Aecouutabjltty in Decision-MtaNing:
o I request the estciblishment of a cominunity advisory board that includes residents, enviromnental expels, and ci(y officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoringthepro3ect's impacts.

5. Adelaa Ave. Coxuerete Bacyiet" (K Rajl) to yematn in plaee:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the .[( rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier win Iikeiy lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quaiity, Irequest a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential healtl't impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level tes'ting to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow m'id for ongoing moriitoring of air and noise pol!utioi'i levels if the banier is removed. Engaging health azzd environinental experts o analyze these impacts is essential,
I trust that you will give these concerns the attention they deserye, rSlgIm7tA&ma;,[r4 Date:
t0'5 124
OPPOS:['fNON TO 10130 ADELLA 'ff?ROJF, € T
'Project") Below, l havc outlined my reasons for opposing arid correspondixig requests to consider chatiging my opposition:

L Comprehensive EnvironnxentaR TestNngi
0 Irequestthatthede'veloperconductathoroughEnviroiunentalImpactAssessment (Ei:IA) before the Projecr. is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potentiai environmental effects, iricluding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I i>elieve that the project should not be qualified as cxeinpt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmemal Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to t'iaffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. lf this is not tie, 1 would like to receive the comprehensiye report that proves the aboye untrue,
2, Transparency on Contaminatioxu Jssues:
o Xseek detaiied reports on past contamination issues associated with the prqject site and how these will be addressed. Specifically, l would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and jiow clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not mow finther testing done after 8/17/2021,

3. Qugoing EnviconnientaN MonNtocing:
o I propose the establisl'imerit of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency piai'xs if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the liealth of iltildren, vulnerable I:iopulatiou, and all coinmunity members is of'utrnom iriiportance,

4. AecountabANity An Decision-Makingi
o 1 reguest the astablisbment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmentat experts, and city officials to oversee tl'ie environmental aspects o[' the project. This will enst.ire accountability aruJ provide residents with a voice in monitoring tbe prujeci's impacts.

5. Adelka Ave. Conerete Baa'rfier (K RaU) to renuain m peace:
o I strongly urge the city to lceep tlic K rail closed,to all traffic. Removing the K banierwill likely lead to increased veliicle emissions, furth.er degradi'iig air quality.

I request a cornprehei'isive air quality assessment to undcrstand the potential health impacts Ol'l residenls. Additionally, I advocate for noise )evel testing to evaluate tlte efects <:if increased traffic flow and for ongoing moxiitoiing of air and noise pollution Ievels if the barrier is removed. Engaging !iealth and environmental experts to analyze tbese ix'iipacts is essential.

I trust tbat you will give tl'iese concerns the attention tttey deserve, VlCl'hJ\iw'94,,5
Sigiaiatare Date:
3S*S#
lag 125
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECI'
! %c i 0 \'p,bias am opposing ihe 10130 Adeila Project (the =@Project") Below,I haveoutlinedmyreasonsir opposingand correspondin@requeststo conmder changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive EnvironmentaJ Testingz
o l request that the developer conduct a thorough Eiivirotmental Impact Assessment (EJA) before the Project is approved, This assessmentshould evacuateall potemial environmentaleffects,includin@ air quality, noise poliutiori, andtraffic impacts, l believe Thattheproja;'t shouid not be qualified asexempt tuder CBQA Categorical Exemption under sectio:n15332 (Ciass 32-Developmental Proje(!its). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that provesthe above untrue,

2. Transparency no 4"nmiimiqn+ion ixtxesx a
o IseekdetaJledreportsonpastcontamimtioritssuesassociatedwiththeprojectsite andIIOWthese will be addressed. Specifica}!y, I would like to know whattests will be coriducted, which substanoesare of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soiJ and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testirig done after 8/!7/2021,
3, Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o € proposethe establishmentof a plan for ongoin@ environirientalmonitoring throughouttheeongtrixcttorxandoperational phases, This plan should outline how soii vaportnonitorir< wilibe mixductedpost-constructioriandincludecontingency plans if vapor issuesare detecteddung testinBat tlxe building permit stage.

Protecting the health of chi)dreri, vuiaerable populations, axid ali coin!Iluriity members is ofqtmost impomtnce,

4. A'ponntq1mlJy in T)ecision-Muking:
o I requestheestabltshrnemof acommunityadvisor boardthatiricludesresidents, environmemalexperts,arid city officials to ovet'see the environmental aspectsof thepto3ea.This Wit}ensureaccountabilityam3pro'videresidentswith a voice in monitoring the pmject's impacts.
5, AdellaAve. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rait closed to all traffic. Ramoving the K barrierwilllikelyleadto increasedvehic!eemissions,futtherdeHradingairquality. l request a comprehensive air quality agsessmentto understandthe potential health impacts on residents, Additioxmly, l advocate for noise level testing to evacuatethe effects of increased trafftc flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution kevels if the barrier is removed, Engaging heaIti and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essentia!.

I tnxstthat you svill giye these concerns the attention they deserve, /[[-r
Da"tea) 't'S)20:Xr
(C)'I 126
oposxci(is AL PROYECTO toy,:io ADEI,LA
Yo me opoxigo a} ProyectolOl30 Adelka
(el "Proyecto"). A contii'iuaci6ii, he expuesto mis razoi'ies.para oponerme y Jas solicitudes correspondientes para coi'isiderar cainbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambieutales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrotlador reatice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (E}A) exhaustiva antes de que se imp!emente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos 10S posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo IEI cali<lad deL aire, la containinaci6n acastica y !os impactos en el trAfico, Crco que (:l proyecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Hxenci6n Categ6rica de IB CEQA, scgtxn la secci6n 15332 (CJase 32 - I)royectos de Desarrollo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la catidad del aire o la calidad dei agua. De no ser ash, me gustaria reciLiir el informe completo que Jo demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Prob!e'mas de Contaniinaci6n:
o Busco infom'ies detallados sobre probtemasde contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6i'no se abordataAn. Especfficannente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, curies sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado qt'ie el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales reaLizadas despu6s de) 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental ConUnuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un p]an para el n'ionitorco aixibientai continuo durante kas fases dt:i construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizar6 el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectai> problcmas dc vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Pro(eger la saJud de los iiifios, las poblaciones vulnerab)es y todos }os miembros de }a comunidad es de maxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito C!l cstablecimiento de rin consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio an'ibiente v funcionarios de la ciudad pma supervisai- (os aspectos amliientales del proyecto. msto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindara a 108 residentes una voz en el n'ionitoreo de los impactos de! proyecto,

5. La lrarrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permi'inecerA en su lugar:
o t.Jr,ioencarecidatnente a la ciudad a manteiier el K rail cerrado a todo trffifico, Levantar la barrera dcl K probablemente conducirffi a un aume.tito en las emisiones de vel'ifculos, degradando akin ri'iAs la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la ca}idad del aire para comprcndcr tos posibles imp<ctos en la salud de Jos resi<lex'xtes,Ademas, abogo porrealizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar los efectos de! aumento en el flu,io de trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de }os niveles de contaminaci6n def aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera. Rs esencial involucriu- a expertos en saiud y medio an'ibiente para analizar cstos impactos.

Conflo en qyie daran a estas preocupaciones ta atenci6n que merecen.

Fl,l,lna 9ffJbAn[!tA 9reta, Feclia
(o'b 127
OPOSICI()N AL PRO17ECT0 10130 Al)ELLA
Yo n'ie opongo al Proyecto 10130 Adella
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para consit(erar cantbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Anibieiltales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n da Jmpacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva aiites de que se implemente cualquier tnidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos ios posibles efectos ambientalcs, incluyendo la cafidad del aire, la coiaitaininaci6n actxsticay los impactosen eltrAfico. Creo quc el proyecto no deberia caliiicar como exento bajo la I3xenci6n Categ6rica de )a CEQA, segun lasecci6nl5332 (Clase 32 - Ptoyectos deDesatrollo), Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tencr efectos significativos en el trffico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir el infortnc cot-npieto que Io demuestre.
2, Transpareucin sobre Prolilemas de Contaminaei6n:
o [3usco informes detaliados sobre probiemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordaran. Especificamerite, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAiai, curies sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo !as n'iedidas de limpie'.a asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y del ag'ua subterrAnea, Dado que, cl Geo Trackcr no mtiestra pruebas adicionaJes realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de urt plan para el monitoreo an"xbiental contin'uo duranle las fases c'le coiistrucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se rcalimA et monitoreo cte vapor da suelo despues de )a construccibn e inctuir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durapte las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los riifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de maxima importancia. 4, Responsabilidad en ia Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito et establecimiento de un consejo ascsor comunitario que incluya a residentcs, expeiios en n'iedio ainbiente y funcionarios de ta ciudad para supervisar 108 aspeclos ambientaies del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a 10S residcntes una voz en el moriitoreo dc 108 impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) da Adella -Ave. permanecer* en su iugar:
o Uijo encarecidamente a la ciudaci a manterter el K rail cerrado a todo trttfico.

Levantar la barrera dcl K probablemente conducirA a un aumento cn tas emisiones de vehfculos, degradando aun mis la calitlad del aire. Solicito tma eyaluaci6n ii'itegral de ta calidad del aire para cornpre.iider los posibles impactos en la salud de los residentes. Adermts, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles da iauido para evaJuar tos efectos de) aumento en d fluio de tr6fico y por on monitoreo continuo de )os niveles de contamiriaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta 'la barrera. Es esencial involucmr a expertos en saiud y medio ambiente para analizar estos iii'ipiictos.

Confio en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que inerecen.

Firmbi Fecha
loj 128
OPOSICI()N AL PROYECTO 10130 ADD,LLA
Yo me opongo al Provecto 10130 Adella
el "Proyccto"), A coritinuaci6n, he expuesto mis razoncs para oponerme )i rassolicitudes correspondientes para considerar canibiar ini oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientnles E.xhaustivns:
o So}icito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluacibn de Impacto Ambiental (BIA) exhaustiva antes de que se impiemeiite cuaJquier unidad autoniatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar (odos los posibles efectos ambientaies, incluyendt:i la calidad del aire, la contamiyiaci6n acristica y los impac(os en el trAfico. Creo qcie C!l proyecto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica cie la CEQA, segi'+ la sccci6n 15332 (CIase 32 - Proyectos de Desarro}lo), Laaprobaci6n del p'royecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en 61trffifico, el tuido, la ca}idad del aire o la calidad det agua, De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir e] inf'orme compJeto que Jo demuestre.

2. Transpiirencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco infor.ines detajlados sobre problemas de contanfftaci6n ariteriores asociados con el sitio del pmyecto y c6mo se abordarAn, Especfficamente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se realizaii, cuAles sustaiicias son preocupantes y c6mo lss medidas de limpieza asegurarm la seguridad <!e)suelo y del cigua subterrmea. Dado que ei Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales reatimdas despu6s del ] 7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ainbiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecinxiento da un plarx para el rnonitoreo ambiental coxitinuo durante las faasesda construcci6n y operaci6n, Este plait debe detallar c6mo se rcalizara el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contirigencia si se detectan problemas <ie vapor dtirante las pruebas an la etapa de permiso dc construcci6n. l)roteger Ia salud de }os ninos, las pob}aciones vulnerables y todos Ios miembros de la comunidad es de mgixima importancia. 4, Responsabilidad en la Toma ice Decisiot'ies:
o Solicito e1 establecimicnto de un consejo asesor comunitaiaio quc incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y funcionarios dc la ciudad para supervisar ios aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA lzt rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentcs una voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La tiarreru (K Raid) de Adella Ave. perntanecerA en 811 lugar:
o Urjo encarecidaxxiente n la ciudad a ixiai'itener el K rail cerrado a todo trico, Levantaio la barrera del K probablen'iente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradando aun mis la calidad del aire. Solic.ito una evaluaci6n integra) de la calidad dcl aire pctra comprender los posibles impactos en la sa)uct de los residentes, Ademas, abogo por realizar prucbas de niveles de ruido paraevaluar los efectosdel aumentoen (!1 flt4jo de tr*fico y por un moxiitoreocontinuo de los niveles dc contarnitiaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levai'ita la barrera. Es esericia} involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para analizar estos irnpactos.

Confio en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que mereccn.

Firn"ia Feclia
129
OPOSICION AL PROYKCTO 10130 ADF,Ll,A
Yo me opongo al Proyecto }0130 Adella (ei "Proyecto"), A continuaci6n, he expuesto niis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar ini oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Ambienta}es Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambienta} (EIA) exhaustiva ayites da que se implemente cualquier xinidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ax'nbientales, incluyendo iff ca}idad del aire, la contaminaci6n acastica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyectono deberiacalificar comoexento ba.3o)a Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, scgun la secci6n 15332 (Cbtse 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos an eJ'hThfico, el ntido, la catidad det aire o tacalidad del agua. De 110 ser asi, me gustaria recibir el informe compJeto que lo demuestre.

2. Trnnsparencia sobre Probjemas de Contaminaci6n:
o BIISCOinforines detajlados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociaclos COl'lel sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn, Especifican'iente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruetms se realiz,arffi, curies sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de Iin'ipieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y del agua subtei'rAnea. Dado que el Geo Trackcr 110muestra pruebas adiciona}es realizadas despu6s de} 17/08/2021.

3. Mouitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plai'i para el monitoreo anibiental continuo duraixte las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Rste plan debe detatlar c6mo se realizarAelmonitoreodevapordesueiodespu6sdclaconstnicci6ne incluirlitanes dc contingencia si se dctectan problenias de vapor dtirante Jas pi'uebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la sa)ud de los nifios, las pob}aciones vulnerables y todos lcis miembros de.la comi.'inidad es de maxima importancia. 4, Responsabilidsd eu la 'Il'oma da Decisiones:
o Solicito cl establecimiento de up conse,jo aSeSOr conuuiitario que incluya a residentcs, exper(os en medio ainbiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA }a rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una voz an el moriitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. I,a barrera (K Raj}) de Adel!a AY(!. permanecer6 en su lugar:
o Urjo cnczu'ecidamente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trffico.

Levantar la barrera dcl K probablemente conducirA a un arunento en }as en'iisiones de vehfcu)os, degradando am tnAs la calidad del aire. Solicito una cyahiaci6n integral thela calidad del aire para comprender 108 posibles impactos en la salud de tos residemes. Ademas, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para cvaJuaia tos efectos del auniento en e!lf%io de trAfico y por xin mo*iitoreo coiitinuo de Ios niveles de contarninaci6n c}el aire y det ruiclo si se levaiita la barrera. F,s esenciai involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ari'ibiente para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en qrie darAn a estas prcocupaciones la atcnci6n que merecen.

Firma 3 <y,/7r Feclia
130
OPOSICI("N AL PROY'ECTO 10130 ADELLA
Yo me opongo al Proyecto 10130 -Adella
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expyiesto nis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambim mi oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Atnbientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador reaiice uiia Ixva)uaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exliaustiva a+ites de que se implemente cuafquier unidad autornatizada, Esta evakuaci6n debe evatuar todos 108 posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, ta contaminaci6n acttstica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberta calificar como exento bajo la JExenci6n Categ6rica de ta CEQA, seganla secci6n l 5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). La ciprobaci6n del proyccto podrfa tener ef'ectos significativos en cl trafico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del ag,ua. De no ser asf, me gustaria recibir el infotrne cori"ipleto que to den'iuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaniinaci6n:
o Busco informes ttetauados sc:ibre problen'ias de contaminaci6n aiiteriores asociados con el sitio del proyectoy c6moseabordarAn.Especfficamente5 me gustaria saber que pitebas se realizarAn, curies sustaiicias Sail preoc'upantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurar6n la seguridad del suelo y del agtia subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra prucbas adiciona!es rea}izadas despu6s dcl 17/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Arnliientat Continuo:
o Propongo cl establecimiento de un plai'i para el monitoreo atnbiental continuo durai'ite las Cases cte coi'istibcci6n y operaci6n. IEste plan debe detal}ar c6mo se reaJizaaaAel moiiitoreo de vapor t')e sue!o despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingenciasi sedetectanproblemasde val)or durari(elas pi'uebasen la ctapa de pe'iwiiso de co'itstrucci6n. Proteger la salud de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de Ja comunidad es de m,ixima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en Ja Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecin'iiento de un consejo ascsor comunitario que incluya a resident.es, expeitos an rnedio tunbiente y funcionarios de ta ciudad para supervisar kos aspcctos a'i'nbientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA }a rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una yoz, en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto,

5. La barrera (K Raid) de Adellsi Ave. pcrmanecerii en su lugar:
o Urjo encarccidantente a la ciudad a mai'iteuer cl K rail cerrado a toclo trafico, Levantar la barrera del K probablemen(e conducirA a an aumento en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradanclo a(ti'i n'iAs ia calidad del aire. 8olicito una evaluaci6n ixitegral de la calidad del aire para comprcnder los posibles impactos en IEIsalud de los residentes. Adem6s, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para eyialuar los efectos del aumento en el flujo de tr+ifico y por un n'ioniloreo continuo de 108 niveles de contaminaci6n dcl aire y tlel ruido si se )evanta la barrera. Es esencial involucrar a expcrtos en salud y medio axnbiente para aiializar estos irnpactos.

Confio en que darfm a estas preocupaeioxies ta atenci6n que merecen.

F,4[],[AA% a(3/p4 mzs
Feclia
131
OPOSICI('N AI, PROYECTO iOI30 ADEI,LA
YO I)ScAR ()kAr"s'ooio"7'o meopongoalProyectolOl30Ade}la (ei "Proyecto"'), A contiiiuaci6n, l'ie expuesto mis ra7.OneSpara OpOnell'ne y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

I. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivagi
o Solicito que el desarro}lador realice yii'ia F,valuaci6ri de }mpacto Ambieiital (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que sc implen'iente cualquier unidad automatizada. Bsta eva)uaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos a.inbientales, incluyendo ta calidad de) aire, la contaminaci6n acuslica y los impactos en el trAfico, Creo que el proyecto CBQA, segrin
no deberia
Ia
calificar como exento bajo !a Exenci6n Cate@6ricade la secci6n Z5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). La aprobaci6n adl;rleporolydaeccatollldpaoddrdfaelteangeuraefDecctollsosSigenriafiS71 mlaecalLOidmapdledteO
que lo dcmuestre, '

2. Transpsrencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
0 Busco informes dctallados sobrc problen'ias de containinaci6i'i anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn, Especffimmente, me g,ustar €a saber qu6 pmebas se realizarAn, cuAles sustancias soi'i preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegtu'arAn la segiridad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado qtie el Geo Tracker no muestra prucbas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambjcntal Continuo:
o Propougo el establecimiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de coxistrucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detal!ar c6mo se rea!iy,arA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planeis de contingenciasi sedetectaiiproblcn'iasde yapor duraiite lasliruebas et'i la etapa de pern'iiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los nii"tos,las lioblaciones vulnerables>rtodoslos miembrosdeila comtinida<tesde maximaimportaricia,

4. Responsabilidad eu Ja Toma da Decisiones:
0 resic'!eiites,
Solicito el
expertos
estabiccirniento de un conse3oasesor comunitario que ii'icluya a e.n medio ainbientey funcionarios de )a ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ainbientalcs del proyecto. Esto garanttzarA la rendici6n de cuenlas y brindar& a los residen(es una yoz en el inonitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) tle Adel}a Ave. permnnecer't en su lugar:
o Urio encarecidainente a la ciudad a mantctter el K rail cerrado a toclo trThco. Lsvantar de vehfcu!os,
la barreradcJK lirobablementeconducirAa un aumentoen las emisiones dcgrac!ando aun mis la calidad del aire. Solicito t.'ina evatuaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprende.r Ios posibles impactos en la salad de los residentes. Ademas, abogo por realizar pruebas de iveles de rt'iido para evaluar tos efectos dci aumento 811 cl flijo de trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo tie los niveles de contaminaci6n clel aire y del ruido si se levanta la banera. Es esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para analizar cstos impactos.

Confio en q'ue darAn a estas preocupaciones la atcnci6n qte merecen. 3 ,QS, 2G'-
Feclia
132
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PRO.TECT
changing my opposition:
]. Comprehensive EnvironuientalTesting:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentallrnpactAssessrnent (EIA) before the Project is approved, This assessment should evaluate all potential enviroximental effects, incJuding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I betieve that the project should not be qualified as exempt tinder CEQA Categoricat Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quaiity. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report tliat pro'ves the atyove untrue,

2. Transpaiae:ncy on Contamination I88ues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contaniiimtion issues associated with the project site and how thcse will be addressed Specifically, I would like to know what tests wi!l be conducted, which substances are of concern, aiid liow clean-up measures will ensure soil axid groundwater safety. As ffie G'eo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021,

3. Ongoing EnvirotunentaJ Monjtoring:
o } propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing envirotuanental monitoring thmughout the coristr'uction and operational phases. This plan should outline liow soil vapormonitoiing will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if 'vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importaiice.

4. AccountabiEity in Decision-Making:
o [ request the establishment of a co.inmunity advisory board that includes residents, eiwironmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents witli a voice in monitomg the project's impacts.

S. Ade}la Ave. Concrete Barrjer (K Rail) to remain in peace:
o L strongly urge the city to keep tbe K rail closed to ali traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to i:ncreased veliicie emissions, further degrading airquality, I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level testingto evaluate tlte effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution teveis if the barrier is removed. Engaging healtli and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

I trustthat you will give these co'i'icerns the attention they deserve, Signature Date:
133
OPPOSJ:'nON TO nOi30 ADEN,LA PROJN!I,C'N'
Project") Betow,I have ouainedmy reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Compyeherisive Envtronrnental 'festing:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmental Impact Assessinent (EIA) before the Project is approved, This assessment should evacuate all potential envirorunental effects, iricluding ait quality, noise pollutior>, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section ) 5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to tr'affic, noise, air quality, or watet quality. If this is not tr-ue, I would Iike to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue,
2, Transparency on CoritaxnNnatjon Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past containination issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of conceni, and how cleaii-up measures will ensure soil arrd groundwater safety. As tiie Geo Tracker does not show further testing doxic after 8/17/2021.

3. Onngoing F,nvNronimentan Monffitocing:
o I propose tI'ie establisliment of a plan l'or ongoing enyironmental monitoring throughout the conshuction and operational phases. ailiis piai'x ,sliould out)ine liow soil vapor monitoi'ing will be condt'ic[ed post-constuction and inctude contingericy pkans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building pemit stage.

Protectiiig the health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of'utrnost in'ipoitance.

4. Aeeouuxtabtltty ABIDeeision-Makixxg'.
0 I bquest the establishment of a community advisory bo,a:rdthat includes residents, environmental experts, aixd city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the projiact. "l'his will ensate accountability and provide residerits with a voice in monitoring tlaieproject's impacts.

5. Ade]laAve. ConeyeteBaxioNer(K RaffiN)to retuam ffinHbjaee:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Reznoving the K barrier will likely lead to increased 'vehicle einissions, further degrarling air quality, Irequest a comprehe'nsive air quality assessn'ienl to tu'iderstaiid the potentiat health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise lavel testing to evacuate the eftscts of increased tratTic flow arid for ongoing monitoring of ir and noise pollution levels if the barricr is removed, Engaging hea)lh and cnvironrnental experts to analyze these itnpacts is essential.
you will give these concerns the attention they dese.tve.

A
',y Da
ltS
134
"Project")Below, I have outlinedmy reasons for opposing and corresporiding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Envirouniental Testing:
o I request that the developeir conduct a thorough Enviromnental Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved, This assessment sliould evaluate all potential environmental e'ffects, including air quality, noise polkutiori, aitd traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified as exeinpt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under sectiori 25332 (Class 32-Deve.!opmental Projects). Approval of the projecl may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. ff this is not true, I wouid like to receive the comprehensive reporL that proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Comamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reporU on past contarniyiatron issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specificatly, 'Lwould tike to know what tests will be conducted, wbich substaiices me of concern, and how cleaix-up tneasures wiii ensure soii and groundwafer safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing doi'ie at'ter 8/t7/2021,

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o 1 propose the establishment of a plai'i for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout tbe coiistruction arid operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will beconducted post-coiistruction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance.

4. Accountability to Decision-Mnking:
o Trequest tl'ie establishment of a community advisory board that includes regidents, eixviromriental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspeds of the project. This wiil ensure accountability and provide residents with a yoice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5, AdeJIaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRail)toremaininpiace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to ail traffic. Removing tbe K hairierwit?likely leadtoincreasedvehicleemissions,fuitherdegradin@ air quality.

I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potemia) health impacts on residents. Additionaliy, r advocate for noise levei testiiig to evaluate the effects of increased t'rafflc flow and for oxigoing monitoring of air axid noise pollution levels if the baiiier is removed. Engaging liealth and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
l trust tliat you will give these concerns the attention they deserve, Date: d>At7'A<
ll(/ 135
OPPOS'iTlON TO 20130 ADELLA l)ROJF,CT
:t Als,>na5iiix.-z*) amopposingthe10130AdeliaProject (the "Project") Below, I have outlmed my rcasons for opposing aixd corresponding requests to consider changii'i@my opposition:

L Comprehensive Envimnmental Testing:
o I request tliat the developer coriduct a thorough Environniental Impact Assessment (EIA) before tlie Project is approved, This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, inc)uding a:xrquality, noise polLution, and traffic impacts. l belie've that the project shorild not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorica} Exemption tinder section I)5332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tliis is not true, l woult) like to recei've the comprehensive report that proves tlic above cmtrue.
2, Transpaiaency Ol] Contnmimilion Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the project site ai'id how these wiil be addressed, Specifically,, l would like to 1<i'iow what tests wilt be con&icted, which substaxices are of c.oncern, and Iiow clean-up measures wilt ensure soil and grourrdwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not sliow fur(her testing done afl:er 8/17/2021.

3. Ougoixig Environnientiil Mouitorjng:
o .T propose Lhe establisl"iment of a plait for ongoing environmental monitoring tliroughout the construction and operational pl'iases, T'liis plaii sliould outline how soil vapor i'rioniiorin@wil} be conductedpost-construction andinclude contingertcy plaiis if vapor iSSues are detected during tcsting a( the building permit stage, Protecting the l'ieulth of cliildrei'i, vt.dnerat'>le populations, and all community metnbers is of utinost importance.
4, Accountabiiity in l')ec.ision-Making:
o I request tlie establishment of a con'imunity advisory board that incli.itlcs residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmenti aspects of tlie pro,ject. This will ensure account:ability and providc residents wi(li a voice in monitoring the project's in'ipacts.

Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Riiil) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city 'lo keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Rernoving the K barrier virilJ likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, furtlier degrading air quality.

I reqriest a comprehensive air quality assessment to understa'i'id the potentiat liealth in'ipactsonresidents,Additionally,Iadvocatefor7jevelt:gtoevaluatethc efft=cts of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if tlie trarrier is removed. Engaging health mid eirvironmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

I (hat, w'i-!givetheseconcerns theattention
Signature
tl'iey deserve.

Date:
.f,bB@iuDlAAl,i Hbus6< 'k ']b ")"\ t('l 136
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELL-A PROJECT
I"Pr!ff)Z'o9hN?'Mri\reasons for oppolsinngopaupido'c'onrgre(lshpeo changing my opposition:

1. Compreiiensive Comnreiiensive Environmental Testing:
o I request that the deveJoper conduct a $1':ioroughEnvironinental Impact Assessinent (E'[A) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all poterxtial environmental effects, inclttding air quality, noise pollution, atxd traffic impacts. [ lielieve that the project should not be qualified as exeiupt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). -Approval of the project may result in sigi':iificant efFects relating to traffic, noise, air qriality, or water qciatity. If this is not ttaue, l would like to receiye the comprehensive repoit that pi'oves the above untrue.

2. I'ranspareney on Contamination issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past containination issues associated with the project site ai'id how tlaiesewill be addressed, Specificall)i, L would like to kllOW what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, aitd how clean-up n'ieasures wil) ens'ure soil and groru'ibttater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show fir(her testing doi'ie after 8/1 7/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmenta{ Monitoring:
o l propose the establishment of a plaii for ongoing environmental xnonitoring througliout the construction and operational pliases. This plan sl'iould outline how soil vapor monitorixig will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plaxis if vapor issues are detected during testing at (he buikding permit stage, I)rotecting lhe liealtli of clxildren, vulnerabte poputations, aiid all commuriity members is of rrlmost imptutance.

4. Accountahility in Decision-Mxiking:
o I request tlie estatilishinent of )1 comimmity advisory board ttrat includes tesidents, exivironrnetr[al experts, and city officiats to oversee the en'vironmentak aspects of the pro,ject. This witl ensiire accountability and proyide residents with a voice in rno+tito:tii'ig the pto5ect's impacts.
5, Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to reniain iii peace:
o k stroxigly urge tl'ie city to keep the K rail closeci to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, furtlier degrading air quality.

I request a comprehensive air qriality assessment to cmderstand the potential kiealth impacts 011residents. Aciditionailyjadvocatc for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air ai'id noise pollution levels if tl'ie barrier is rcinoyed. Engaging liealtli mid envirorimental experts to a:iialyzc these impacts is essential.

I tiust tliat you wilJ give tbese concerns llie attention they deserve. e['4JLd Dat(>:
!7-5-'!5
137
OPPOSITION IU 10130 ADELLA PROJF,C'l'
I Ah m,i4 4,/ <pi,t'eA avnopposingthe10130Ade)JaProject(the "Project")Below, Thave oifflinedrny reasons for opposing and corvsponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Kyironmental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentaHmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project iS approved. This assessment should evacuate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise poliution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Deveiopmental Projects). Approval of the projed may result iit significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quaiity, or water quaiity. If this is not tme, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above mhue.

2. Tinsparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detaiied reports on past containination issues associated with the project site and how these wiil be addressed. Specifically, I wouid Zike to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures wili ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done attet 8/17/2021,

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environtnental monitoring throughout the constuction and operational phases, This plan mould outline how mil vapor monitoringwill be conducted post-coristuction aiid include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance,

4. AccountabiEity in Decisioix-Making:
o I request the establiserit of a commuriity advisory board that includes residents, environngental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmenta] aspects of thepro,iect.Thiswill ensureaccountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5* AdeljaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRatl)toremaininplace:
o I gtongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all trdic. Retnoving the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality.

I request a comprehensive air quality assessmentto understand thepotentialliealth impacts on residents.Additionally, [ advocate fornoise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoffng of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmenta} experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

I tmstthatyou will give these concerns the attention they deserve, Signature
lkC') 138
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(ej"Pra9cct'6"),A continuaci6ii,he expuestomis razonesparaoponermey las soticitudes correspondientes para considerar can'ibiar ini oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
0 Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exliaustiva aiites de que se implcmente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibies efectos anibientales, incl'uyendo la calidad del aire, la contanii.i'iaci6n ac€istica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no dcberfa calificar como exento bajo }a Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtiri la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proycctos de Desarrollo), l,a aprobaci6n del proyecto podria tcner efectos significativos en el trA-fico, c} niido, la caiidad del aire o }a calidad del agua. De no ser ast, me gustarfa recibir el informe compieto qt'ie lo demuestre.

2. Transparencia solyre l)robEemas de Contamitiaei6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre probiernas de contarninaci6t'i anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificamente, me gustaria sabeia qu6 pi'uebas se realizarAri, cuAles sustaiicias son preocupax'ites y c6mo las medidas delimpieza ascBurarAn Jaseguridaddel sueloy dei aguasubterriiea, Dadoqueel Geo Tracker no muestra prucbas adicionakes realizadas despu6s del 17708/2021,

3. Monitoreo Ambientnl Continuo:
0 Propongo e} establecimiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n, F,ste plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA cl moiiitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6rt e iiicluir planes de contizigencia si se detectan pmblemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los nifios, las poblaciones vtdnerables y todos 108 micmbros de la comunidad es de maxima i'inportancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Tonia de Deeisioncs:
c Solicito el establecin'tiento de un consejo asesor comunilario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ainbiente y funcionarios de la ciudad paiaa supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una voz en el monitoreo de tos impactos deJ proyecto.

5. La burrera (K Raii) de Adella Ave. permnuecerA en so lugstr:
o Uijo encarecidamente a la ciriciad a mantener el K rd cerrado a todo trThco.

I,c'vantar la barrera del K proliablementc conducirA a ffll aumento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradai'xdo arui n'iffis la calidad dei aire. Solicito tuia evalciaci6n integral de la calidad del airc para comprendcr )os posiMes impactos en la salud de los residentes. AdemAs, abogo por rcalizar pruebas de ni'veles de ruido para evaluar los cfectos clel aumento en el flujo de trAfico y pot un monitoreo continuo de tos niveles de contaminaci6n(delaire y dcl ruido si se le'vanta la !yarrera. Es esencial ir'tvo}i.'icrar a expertos en sal'ud y medio ambiente para aiializar estos impactos.

Confio en que darAn a estas preocupacioxies la atenci6n que inerecen.

Firma Fecha
%O 139
OPPOSIIION TO 10I30 ADEI,LA PROJECT
I Ml 4U€u A, C>\'-€ZCb am opposing the lOi30 Adella Project (the a'Project")Below,} bave outlined my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my oppositiorx:

1. Comprehensive Environinental Testing:
o IreqtiestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironrnentalImpactAssessment (E!A) before the Project is approved, This assessment sliould evaluate ail potential environmemal effects, inchtding air quatity, noise poliution, and traffic impacts. S believe that the project should not be qua{ified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project tnay result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, Xwould like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untrue.

2. I'ransparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seelcdetailed reports on past contamination isSues associated with the project site andhow these will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances arc of concein, and how clean-up measures will ensure soi[ and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testiitg done afier 8/17/202],

3. Oxxgoing Environmental Monitoring:
o { propose the establishinent of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and opera'tional phases. This plan should outline how soii vapormonitoring wil} be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the health of children, yulnerable populations, and afJ community members is of utmost importance

4. AccountabiJity in Decision-Maliing:
o l reqriesi ti'ie establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This will ensure accounlability and provide residents with a voice in rnorxitoring the project's impacts.

5. AdellaAve.ConereteBarrier(KRail)toremaininpJace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will iikely lead to increased vehicle emissions, fuither degrading air quality. l request a comprehensiye air qua]ity assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise lcvel testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution Ievels if the barrier is removed. Engaging hea}tit and environmentaI experts to analyze tliese itnpacts is essential.

Jtrust that you wilf give these coxicerns the atterition they deserve. @3/3%.1'2J
Date:
140
OPPOSiTION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I L;)!,so §vmv-e,> ,, amopposingthe lO]30AdellaProject(the "Project")Below, l haveoutlinedmy reaso'nsfor opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmentai Testing:
o
I requestthatthe developer conduct athoroughEnvironmental ImpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved, This assessment shouid evaluate all potential environinental effects, incliidixig air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, I believe thatthe project should not be qualified as exeinpt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 ((,lass 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significanteffects telating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water qua!ity, lf tliis is not true, I wouid Jike to receive the comprehensive repoit that proves the above untrue,
2, Transparency on Contamination Issues:
0 I seek detailed repoits on past contarninatiori ISSUESassociated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how c]ean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, AS the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done affer 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing EnvjronmentaJ Monitoring:
o I propose tl'ie establishment of a plan for oxigoing environmental monitoring throughout the constmction and operationai pl'iases. This plan mould outline how soil vapormonitoring will be conducted post-coristruction and include contingency plaits if vapor issues are detected during testiiig at the buildirig permit stage, Protectixig the I'iea}th of children, vulnerttble popu}atioi'is, and all community members is of inmost in'iportance,

4. Accountability in Decision-Makmg:
o [requesttheestablishi'nentofacommunityadvisoiyboardthatincludesresidents, environmental expexls, and city officiais to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoi'ing the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (I( Rail) to remain ixi placei o I strongly urge the city to keep the 'I( rail closed to all tmfflc. Removing the K barrier wiil likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, furlber degrading air quality. l request a comprehensive air quality assessment to tu'iderstand the potentiai healtti impacts onresidents. Additionally, [ advocate for noise level testing to evacuate the effects of increased tr&c flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed, Engagiiig health and environmental expertsto analyzetheseiml)acts is essen.tial.

Ktust that you will give tliese concerns the attention they deserve.

Signatute ';isAa>r
1'2,,7, 141
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I (, j4[ t .'onCa am opposing tie JOI30 Adella pro-ject (the "Project")Below, l have outliried 'my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider ehaty,ing my opposition:

1. CompreliensiveEnvironmentalTesting:
o IrequesttttatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironinentallmpactAssessment (EIA) before tl'ie Pnoject is approved. This assessment should evaluate atl potential environmenta) effects, iricluding air quafity, noise polIution, and traffic impacts. [ believe thatthe project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categoricai Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Deveiopmenta} Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quaiity, or water quality. If this is not true, Twould ]ike to receive the comprehensive report tliat proves the above untrue.

2. Transpareng Oil ContaminaUon Issues:
o I seek detailed repoits on past contamination issues associated with the project site at'id110Wthese svikl be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which sul:+stancesarc of concern, and liow clean-up measures will ensure soil aiid groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not shoui further testing done after 8/1 7/2021.

3. Ongo;ng Rnvironmental Monitoring:
o I propose the cstablishnient of a plan for ongoing envii:orimental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-constittction arid include contingency plaiis if vapor iSSues are detected 'during testirig at tl'ie lyuilding peimit stage.

Protecting tlie health of children, vuJnerabte populations, and all community men'ibers is of utmost importance,

4. Actountability in Decision-Maktng:
o I request the estalzlishrnent ofa community advisory board that includes residents, eixvironmental experts> and city officials 10 oversee fhe environtnentai aspects ota the project. This will tirisure accountab'ility and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts,

5. Adclla Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in plnce:
o I strongly urge, the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic, Removing the K barrier will likely lead to incrcased vehicle ernissions, further degradirig air quality.

I request a comprehensive air quaiity assessment to 'itnderstand the potentia} hmlth impacts on residei:its. AdditionaJJy, I advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effe,cts of incyease;d traffic flow and j:or ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollutiox'i levels if tlie barrier is removffl. Engaging health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential,
Ttrust that you wi}l give these concerns the attentioit tbey deserve, Qr (7
Date
IJ-'> 142
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(Ye(l "l')'roy!c:!)" A Em;'iE'i'!!i," K't!!uQmisrazonespro;,a< popololxgi(e'r'n'ie' >rrr'a's:g'oolilcOitlu3dOe's correspondientes para considerar can'ibiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:

W Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de fmpacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antcs de que se implemente cuaiquier unidad automatizada. Bsta eyaJuaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos mnbiei'itales, inc'Juyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el pro)iecto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segi"inla secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos deDesarroilo). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos signit-icativos eri el ttafico, el ruido, la calidad de!l aire o la calidad da) agua, De no ser asf, irie gustgia recibir el inforinc completo (111E!}o demriestre.

2. TransparenciasobreProblemasde(,'ontaminaci6u:
@ Busco informes detallados sobreproblernasde contaminaci6n anterioresasociados con e] sitio del proyecto y c6ino se abordarAn. Especificanienle, me gustarfa salzer qu6 prucbas se realizarm, cuAles sustancius son preocupantes y c6mo las inedidas de limpieza aseguraranla seguridaddel suelo >rde! agua subterrmea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra piauebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
@ Propongo el cstablecimiento de LTII plan para el monitoreo ainbiental continuo durame tas fitses de construcci6n y operaci6n, F,ste plan debe detallar c6n'io se realizarA el .i'nonitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectaii problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en ta etapa de pern'iiso de construcci6n. Proteger la saJud de los nirios, las poblaciones vulneraliles y todos los miembros de La comuriidad es de mAxin'ta importaiicia,

4. Responsalitlidad en la '!'oma de Decisioties:
# Solicito el establecii'riiento de ill) conseio asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expeitos en medio aml>ientc y funcionarios da la ciudad para supetvisztr 105 aspcctos anibientalcs cle} proyec.to. Bsto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a tos residentes lm[l voz en e) monitcireo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera K Rail) de Adelln Ave. permnnecerA en su lugar:
* Urjo encarecidarnente a la ciudad a mantencr el K rai} cerra<lo ci todo trAfico.

Levanlar la barrera Je) K proliableirierite conducira a un aumento en las emisiones de veliiculos, degradando aun ini la ca!idad deJ aire, Solicito una e'valuaci6n integral de la calidad dcl aire para comprender 108 posibles impactos en la salud de los resideiites.Ademas, abogopor tealizar liruebas de niveles deruido paraevaluar los efectos del aun'iento en el flu,jo da trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de 108 tiiveles de coil(aminaci6n <tel aire y del ruido si se levaxita la barrera. Es esencial invoJucrar a expertos en sa)ud y medio ambicntc para analizar estos impactos, Conflo en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n qyie merecen. 9/llrlna(pyl44 0sl.&,,,, Feclia
143
(J}POaffION Ill 310230ADELLA PROJECT
I (Say ?Nta
"Project>') Below, rhave outlined my reasons for oppomsiiligoapnpdo:'onrgreIshpeoi1iodiln3 changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environ)TlentaJ Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentallmpactAssessment (EIA) before, the I)roject is approved, This assessment should evahiate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noiz pollution, and traffic impacts. I befieve that the project should not be quafified as exempt under CBQA Categorical Exemption tinder section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in sigttificant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quiity, or water quality, If tliis is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive repon that proves tlie above unti'ue2. Transpareiicy on Contamination Issues:
o 1 seek detailed repoits on past comaminatyon issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed, Specifically, :f would like to know wliat tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, arid bow clean-up measures wili ensure soil and groundwater safety, As tl'ie Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Envimnmental Monitoring:
o r propose the establishment of a plaii for ongoing mvironmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases, This pian should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-coitstruction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Pmtecting the hea]thof children, vulnerablepol:iulations, and all commiuiity members is of utmost imptirtance

4. Accountability in Decbion-Making:
0 1 request the establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the eivironmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability aiid provide residents with a voice i.n monitorixig the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Raj}) to rentain in place:
o l strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K lyarrier willltkely tead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air qriality. I requesi a comprel'iensive air quiity assessment to understandthe potential health impacts on residents. Additionally,Iadvocate for 'iioise level testing to evaluatethe effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of,air and noise poljution levels if the bariier is removed, Engaging health and environmental expexts to analyze these impacts is essential.

Si@nature S=7'l'i!'u%
% Date:
s"t,5 144
g;;T,,ON TO 10130 ADF,LLA PROJECT
(/1,f'!2: amopposingthe10130AdellaProject(the I"Proje&Below,I haveoutliriedmy reasonsforopposirxgandcorrespondingrequeststo consider clging my opposition:

1. Compyehensive Environmental Testjng:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironn'ienta}ImpactAssessmem (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evacuate all potentiai environmentaleffects,incliidinz air quality,noise poilution, and traffic impacts. 1 believe thatthe project should not be qualified as exempt under CBQACategoffcal Exemption under so;'tion 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to tra&, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untnye,
Z, Transparency on Contamnaffon Issues:
0 l Seek detailed repOrt8 0n past COntaminatiOn iSSueSaSSOOiated With the project Site and how thcx will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to knowwhat tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures wili ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
r) I proposethe establishmentof a plan for ongoinB environmentalmonitoring throughout the construction and operational phases, This p}aii sliould outline how soil vapormonitoring will be conducted post-consttuction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the heaitli of children, yulnerable populations, and all commtuiity members is of utmost importance.
4 Aeeountqh41ity in %ion Malmg.
o I request the estab!ishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monttoring the pmject's impacts,

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain m place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality.

I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents, Additionaliy, I advocate fornoise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollutioxi levels if the barrier is removed. Bngaging health and environmental experts to anatyze these impacts is essential,
I tust tliat you wil} giw,
Signature
coneen'is the attention they deserve,
Datq3/'27,/s,,7bl'2u 145
01)POSITI(N TO 10]30 ADELLA PROJECT
i k &e-l re,te-q amopposingthe 10130AdellaProject(the
"Project") Below, I have outlined n'iy reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition.

1.. Comprebensive Environmental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeyeloperconductathoroughErtvironmentalItnpactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is apptoved. This assessment should evaluate a[l potentia} environmei'ital effects, including air quality, noise poliution, and traffic impacts, S believe that the ptoject should not be quaiified as exempt under CEQA Categorica} Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta! l)rojects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quaJity, or water quality. If this is not true, :{ would kike to receive the compreliensiye report tl'iat proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o l scek detailed reports on past contaminatyon issues associated with the project site and how these will ire addtessed, Specifically, { would Jike to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, axid liow cleaxi-up measures wil} ensure soi) and groundwater safety. AS the Geo Tracker does riot show further testing done aftcr 8/17/202L

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitorixig:
o } propose the establishmentof a plan for ongoin@ environmental tnonitoring throrighout tlie construction and operational phases. Tliis plan should outlixie how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-constntction and include; contingexicy plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of diitdren, vulnerable populations, and all cornrnunity members is of utmost importance.

4. Accountability in Dee€sion-Making:
o J:reqtest the establishii"ient of a community advisory board that includes residents, environtnentaf experts, aaxdcity officials to oversee the environmenttal agpccts of the project.This will ensure accountabi[ity and provide residents with a voice in monitoring lhe project's impacts,

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to lceepthe 'K rail closed to all trafic. Removing the K barrierwill lilcely leadto increasedvehicle emissions, fiirther degrading' air quaIity.

I requescacomprehensiveair qi.'iality assessinent to understand the potential health impactsonresidents.Additionally, I actvocatefor noise }evel tesling to evaluate the effectsof increasedtraffic flow aiid for ongoixtg .inoniloring of air and noise pollution)eve'sif the bairier is removed. Engaging health and environmental expertsto aaialyzetheseimpacts is essential
ltrust thatyou will give theseconcerns the attention tbey deserve. -4rdO
Si6iaatul Date:Cl;y},;lr>>r'-
ll'l 146
OPPOS-[TION TO 10130 .kDELLA PROJECT
I ant opposing the 10130 Adella Ptoject (tlie
"Project") Below, I have outlined n'iy reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Eaivironmental Testing:
o I request that tlxe developer conduct a thorocigli Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. Tliis assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, inc)uding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts,I believe that the project shoufd not be qualified as exempt under CIbQA Categorical Exemption under sectioxi 15332 (C)ass 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of tlie project i'nay result in significant ef'lects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tl'iis is not tryie, Twould like to receive the comprehensi've report that proves the abo've untrue.

2. Transparei'icy on Contmnination Issues:
o l seek detailed reports 011pasl contamination isSueS assciciated with tlie project site and liow these will be addressed. Specifically, l would like to know what tests will be conducted, whicli substances are of concern, and liow clean-up measures will ensure soil ai'id grotutdwatcr safety. As the Geo 'I'racker does not sl'iow furttier testing done after 8/17/202L
3, Ongoing Enviconmexital Monitoring:
o I propose (lie establishinent of a pJan for ongoing erivironmentai monito:i'irig tlirougliout the construction and operationa} pliases. Tliis plan sliould oritlinc how soi! valior n"ionitoring will be conduct.ed post-constructioxi and inclucle coalingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at tbe building permit stage.

Protecting the hcakth of' cbildren, vuinerable populations, and all community mcinbers is of utmost importance.

4. Aceountability in 1)eeision-lS4aking:
o 1 request the establishment of a community advisory lyoard that inciudes residems, enviroiitnental expe.its, and city oft'tcials to oversee the enyironmentat aspects of tl'ie project. Tliis will eiisure accountabiJity aixd provide residents with a voice in monitorixig tlie project's impacts,

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain to place:
c I strongly urge rbe city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Ren'xoving tlie K barrier wilt likely teadto increased vehicle cmissions, further clegrading air quality.

I request a compreliensive air q'iality assessn'ient to utrderstand the potential liealtli ir.tpacts on residents, AdditioxiaJly, l advocate for noise level tcsting to evaluate tlie effects of increasedtraffic flow and for ongoinH monitoring of air and i'ioise potkition leyels if the barricr is reanoved. Engaging health and environ.inenta) experts to analyze these in'ipacts is essential.
l tiausttliat you wilt give tliese conccrris the attention they deserve.

Signature Date %) 2)2r
x-t,,(,i147
opos'icx(is AL pr<oyxc'ro 10130ADELLA
correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desatarollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (BIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y los impactos en el trt'fico. Creo que el proyecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de )a CHQ A, segan lasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos deDesaitaollo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podriatener efectos significativos en el tr4fico, el mido, la calidad del aire o la calidad deJ agua. De rto ser asf, me gustarfa recibir e) informe eompleto que Jo demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Probiemas de Contaminuci6n:
o Bttsco informes deta}lados sobre problemas da containinaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordar6n. Especificainentc, me gustaria saber qu6,pruebas se reniixAn, cuAles sustancias son preocupaiites y c6mo las medidas de ?impieza asegurar6n la seguridad de} suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realiz,adas despu6s del i7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durai'ite las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n, Bste pian debe detallar c6mo se realizarAel monitoreo de yapor de suelo despries de la construcci6n e incluirplanes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en }a etapa de permiso de coristrucci6n. Protegcr la salud de los nitios, }as poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de maxima importancia.

4. ResponsiibiJidad en }a Tonia de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de ut conse,jo asesor comunitario que incluya a wsidentes, expeitos en medio ambiente y funciongios da la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambiei'ita:les del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6ii de cuentas y - briridarA a ios residentes una voz en el monitoreo de los in'ipactos del proyecto.

S. La barrera (K Rail) de Atlella Ave. permanecerA eu su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidai'nex'ite a la ciudad a mantei'ier el K rail cerrado a todo trafico.

Levantar la barrcra dcl K probablemente cont!ucirA a un aiimento an las emisiones tle yehiculos, deigradando a6n rubs la catidad del airs. Solicito ui'ia evaluaci6n integral de Ia calidad del airepara comprender los posibles impactos en la salud de loS residentes, AdemAs, abogo porrealizarpruebas de niveles de iido para evaluar ios efectos del aumento en el fliijo de 'trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de contaxninnci6n det aire y del ruido si se }evania la barrera. E!5 esencial invoiucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para anaJizar estos iinpactos.

Coi'ifio en qrie darAn a estas prcocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

Firma
05,-, 2 '/, :2 G
Fecha
ro! 148
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
Project")Below, l haveoutlinedmy reasonsfor opposin@andcorrespondingrequeststo consi&r changingmy oliposition:

1. Comprehensive Environniental Testing:
o I request tbat the developer conduct a thorougli Environmental I'inpact Assessx;neiit (EIA) before the Project is approved, 'This assessment should evaluate atl potential environtnental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. [ believe that the liroject should not be qualified as excmp( under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If this is not true, L would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above uiitiaue.

2. Transparency on Contsmination Issues: a
o J scck detailed tpports on past contamination issues associated with (he project site and how tliese will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know wliat tes(s wifl be conducteri, which substances are of concern, aiid how clean-up measures wit) ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not show furtlier testing done after 8/17/2021,

3. Ongoing Environniental Moxiitoring:
o I propose the establislment of a pkan for ongoing environmental monitoring tlxrougho'i.tt tlie cottstuction and operatioiiai phases, Tliis plan should outline how soil vapormonitoring will be coiiducted pos(-construction and include contingency plans if vapor iSSueS are detecred during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vuinerable populations, arid an comnuu'iiLy members is of utmost importaiice.
4, Aecountaliility in Decision-Mitking:
o l request the establislurient of a coinmunity advisory board that inc)udes rcsidents, environmental experts, and city officials to oyersee tlie environmentaJ aspects of the project. I"his will ensure accountability arid provide residents witl'i a yoice in monitoring tbe project"s impacts.
s. AdeJlnhve,ConcreteBarrier(KRnil)toremaintnplace:
c [ stongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing (:heK lrarrier will Iikely lead to increased vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality. l request a comprehensive air quality asscssmen( lo understand the potential lieaith impacts on residents. Addi(iona)Iyjadvocate for noise level testing lo evaluate tlie effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoiing of air aixd noise pollution }evels if tlie bairier is removcd, Engaging health and environn'iental experts to analyze these irrip*icls is essential.
tnistthat)iou witl givetlies.q;once@s the attention they deserve. :'>/t< /'zoz,sL,
Date:
130 149
OPPOSITIONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
Proiectaa)Below, Thaveoutlined my reasonsfor opposingandcorrespondingrequeststo consider chauging my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorough Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before tl'ie Project is approved. Tliis assessment should evacuate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise ponution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the project should not be qtiajified as exempt under CEQACategorica} Exemption under section15332(Class32-DevelopmentalProiecU).Approval of the project may result irx significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quaiity. If tliis is not true, I WOIII(l like to receive the compreliensive report that proves the above untrue.
2, Transparency on Contaminatlon Issues:
o l seek detaited repoits on past coritamination issues associated witl'i the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically,I would like to know what tests will be conducted, which substances are of concern, and liow clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, AS the Geo Tracker does not SIIOW further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for origoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases, This plan sliould outline how soiI vapor monitoring will be conducted post-constuction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerabie populations, and all cointnunity members is of utmost importance.

4. Aceountability in Decision-Making.
o I request the establisbrnent of a comrriunity advisory board that inctudes residents, environmental expe.its, and city officials to oversee the environmenta} aspects of the project, Tliis will ensure accountability mid provide residents witb a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongiy urge the city to keep thc K raik closed to all traffic, Removing the, K barrier will likely leadto increased vehicle emissio'ns, fuither degrading airquality.

I request a comprehensive air quality assessmentto understand the potential healtli impacts on residents. Additionally, l advocate for noise level testingto evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poilution levels if the bgrier is removed. Engagirig health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

Itrust that yo give these concerns the attention they deserve, Signature D.3/'2,'>-f.z':
150
OPOSICI('N Al, PROYECI'0 10130 ADELLA
yo[l[tci4s-xucti= meopongoakProyecto}Ol30Adella
(el "Pmyecto'). A continuaci6n, he'expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar carnbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Auiliientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Eyatuaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EJA) exhaustiva antes de que se imp!emente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evafuar todos los posibtes efectos ambientales, incluyendo la caiidad del aire, la contaminaci6n ac'6stica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberia calificar como exemo bajo Ia Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segm lasecci6nl5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos deDesarrollo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podriatener efectos significativos en el htfico, el niido, la calidad del aire o la catidad del agua. De no ser asi, me gustarfa recibir el informe completo que Jo demuestre

2. Transpaiaencis sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de containinaci6n anteriores asociados Call e) sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarm. Especfficamente, me gustaifa saber qu6 pruebas se rea}izarAn, envies sustaiicias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de iimpieza asegurarffin la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterr6nea. Dado q'ue el Geo 'rracker no muestra pruebas adiciona)as realizadas despu6s del l 7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el estabiecimiento de un plaxi para e) monitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de mnstmcci6n y operaci6n. 13ste plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarAcl monitoreo de vapor de sue}o despu6s de la coxistrucci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de 10!!I ninos, las poblaciones vulnerabJes y todos los n'tiembros de Ia comtinidad es de m6xinna importancia.

4. ResponsnbilidndenlaTomadeDecisiones:
o Solicito e! estab!ecin'iiento de cm consejo asesor comunitario que incJuya a residentes, expertos en meclio ainbiente y fi.incionarios de la ctudad paiw supervisar los aspectos antbientales del proyecto. Esto garuntizarsa la x'eiaidtcy6n de cuentaS y brindai* a los residentes una voz en cl tnonitoreo de los impactos del proyecto, S. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecer* en su }ugaxa:
o thjo encnrccidamente a la ciudad a mantexier el K rail cet'rado a todo trAfico.

Levantar ta barrera del K probablen'iente conducirA a un aumemo en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradatxdo aun tnAs la calidad del aire. Solicito unn evaluaci6n integral de lacalidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos an la salud de los residentes. Ademas, abogo por realizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar 10S efectos del aumento en el flujo de trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de }os niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y de) ruido si se !evanta la bartera. Es esencial invo!ucraxa a expertos en salud y mcdio ambiente para anali:zmr estos impactos.

Confio en que darAu a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen Firma Alr(4s 5'v4J(-,;y, 3-zLt
Fecha
2QS
l","2, 151
OPOSICI('N AL I)ROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
yoa";ze..v<..,soi.qomcyiy,p3rre,,'norneopongoaiproyectoioiaohaena (el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, he expuesto rms razones para oporierme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerg cainbiar mi oposici6n:
1, Pruebos Arnbientaies Exliaustivas:
o Solicito que el desairollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (ETA) exhaustiva antes de quc se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos 108 posibles efectos arnbientales, incluyendo ia calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n actistica y los impactos en e4trAfico. Creo que el pro)iecto no deberfa calificar como exemo bajo Ia Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA,segun lasecci6i'x 15332 (CIase32-ProyectosdeDesarrollo), taaprobaci6n del proyecto podriatener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la ca)idad del aire o la. caIidad del agua. De no ser asf, nie gustarfa recibir el informe completo que lo dernuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6ri anteriores asociados Cell el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordar6n. Especfficamente, me gumarta saber qu6 pruebas se realizaiaAn, cuales sustancia.s son preocupantes y c6mo tns n'iedidas de limpieza asegurarAn ka seguridad del suelo y del agua subterranea. Dado que eI Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adiciouales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2.021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo tj establccimiento de un plan para el monitoreo ambierital continuo durante ias fmses de constrticci6ti y operaci6ri. Este plait debe detallar c6mo se realizara el moriitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluirplm'ies de contingencia si se detcctan problemas de vapor duraxite las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de corislrucci6n, Proteger la satud de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de n'iAxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Toma da Decisiones.
o SoJicito ej establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitaiio que incluya a residentes, expeitos en medio ainbienle y funcionarios dc la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ainbientales del proyecto. Esto garantizar6. ta rendici6n de cuentas y brindara a108 residentes uria voz en ei monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. Lit barrera K Ritil) da Adella Ave. pennanxent en su lugar:
o Urio encarccidarnentea la ciridad a mantener cl K rail cerrado a todo trAfico.

Levantar la bairera del K probablemente conducirA a un arunento en las emisiones de vehiculos, dcgradando arin rubs la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprender 108 posibles impactos cn la salud de los residentes. Ademb, abogo porrealizar pttebas de nive,les de nxido paraevaluaio JoS efectos del aumento en cl flujo de tAfico y por un monito+eo continuo de los niveles ac contarriinaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta la 'Liarrera. Es esencial ixivolucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambtente para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en que dar6u a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que mereceri.

Firma
3 - iq 2.5
Feclia
152
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
I'4bPB!ow\ohac'bo'u:ed myreasonsforoppomsingopanpdo8c'onrrgeIhep ebanging my opposition:

1. Comprehensjve Environnismtaj Testing:
o irequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmeritallmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Proved is approved.This assessmentshouJdevaluateall potential enviromnentaL effects, including air quality, noise po}fution, and traffic impacts. I believe that the projectshouid not be qualified asexempt under CHQACategoifcal Exemption under sedion 15332 (Class 32-Developmcnta} Projects). Approval of' the project may tvsu}t in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air qtiajity, or water qualffy, If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untnue.

2. Tramparency on Conta:mination Issues: a
o I se.ekdetailed reports on past contamination issuesassociatedwith the.project site and how these will be addressed.Spec.ifica}ly,l woula liketo know whattestswill be conducted, which substanmswe of concern, and how clean-up measureswill ensure soil and groundwater saf'etv.As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done afier 8/t7/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
c l propose the establishinent of a plan for origoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases,This plan shouid outline how soilvapormonitoriq wilt beconductedpost-constructionandincludecontiiigen7 plws if' vapor issues are detected during testiiig at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populatioris, and all coinmunity members is of utmost importance.

4. Aecountnbility jn Decision-Malcing:
o lrequesttbeestablishrnentofacommunityadvisoryboardthatincludesresidents, enyironmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, 'I'his wig} ensure accountability and provide isidents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts,

5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrter(KRail)toremaininplaee:
o 1 strongly e the city to keep the K rai] closed to all trdic. Removing b K barrierwilllikely le=adtoincreasedvehic!eemissions,furtherdegtadingairqity.

Ire4uesi a compreheasive air quality assessmenttounderstandthepotential health impacts on residents.Additionally, I advocatefor noise level testing to evalumethe effects of iricreased traffic flow and for ongoing mortitoring of air and noise pol?utioii ievels if the barrier is removed, Engaging health ad enviroimental experts to analyze theseimpacts is essential.

I tmst that you wUl give these cons the attention they deserve. 3f:Kl;n>r
Date:
t3'\ 153
OPPO!%ITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
1'2!,[n4 'bSA5hh mnoppogtngthe lol30AdellaProject<the
"Project")Below,I haveoutlinedxnyieasonsforopposinBandcorrespondingtequeststo consider ehangingmy opposition:

1. Comprehengjve EnvjronrnentaI Testingi
0 xrequestthattbetieveioperconaumathoroughbnvironmentaibpactessment (EXA)before the Project is approved,This assessmentshomd evaluateall poteniial environmental effects, inctuding atr quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. l believe that the projectshouid notbe qualified as exempt underCEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Ciass 32-Develop:menta!Projects), Approval of the project may result knsignificant effems relattng to traffic, noise, sArquality, or water quality, Iftlffs is not true, I would like to iaeive the comprehensive report that provesthe above untrue,

2. Tinspareney on Contamination Isaues: a
0 I 8eekdetailedrepOXtsOnpantcontamiton issuesassogiatedwith the@OjectBite and how thesewili be addressed.Specifically, I would liketo know whattests will be conduded, wash substancesare of mncern, how clean-up measureswill ensure soil and groundwater safety.AS the Geo Tracker does not show further testing dox after 8/17/202!.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I proposethe establishmerttof a plan for ongoingenviromnentaltnonitonnB throughout the construction and opemtiorxaiphases.This plan should outline how soit vapormonitoriry will be conductedpost-constuctionandincjudecontuxgangy plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the tiuilding permit stage.

Prokctirig the health of children, vulnerable populations, and aU commuriity members is of utmogt impormce.
4* Acceuntablbty in N)episiton=Mqkanga
o ltequesttheestablishmentofacomrunityadviiryboardthatknciudesresidents, envtronmentai experts, and city officials to oversee the environrnenta) aspects of the proJect.This wi]Jemtire acoountabiJityand proiride residents with a voice irl monitoring the pzaoject'simpacts.

S. Adella Ave. Concrete Banter (K Rail) r remain in pJaee:
o l strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrierwi!liikelyleadtoincreasedveMcteeniissionsifurtherdegradiryaitoquality. lrequest acomprehensive air qua!ity assessmentto utiderstandthe potential health intpacts onresidents, Additionally,Iadvocate for rioise le'veltesting toevaluatethe effectsof increasedtxxfflcflow and for ongoingmonitorii4 of air and noise poliution levels if !116barrier is removed. Engaging health and enviroental expem to mialyze theseimpacts is essential.
i trumthatyousviILive theseconcernstheattentiontheydeserve.

Shp
"57:>cl;h
Date:
154
Orl'03illON 'IU '10130 ADELLAPROJECT
chatiging my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmeutai Testing:
o 2requestthatthedeveloperconductathomughEnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before theProject is approved.This assessmentshould evaluateal} potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, } believethatthe projectshouJdnot be qualified n exemptunderCEQACategofflm Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projegts).Approval of the project may result in sigiiificm'it effects relating to traffic, noise, atr quality, or water quality, If t's is not true, l would like to pceive the cornpreherisivereport that provesthe above untrue,

2. Transpamney on Contamination Issues: a
o I seekdetailed reports on past contamination issuesasyciated with tbe project site and howthese will be addressed.SpecificaJIy,J would iike to know whattests wall be conducted, which substancesare of concern, and how c!earl-up measures will eixsuresoil and groundwater safety. AS the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongojng Envjronmental Monitorig:
o ] propose the establis!unent of a plan for ongoing enviroimental monitoring throughout the constqction and operational phases,This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring wiil be conductedpost-mnstmction andincludecontingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building pemk stage.

Protecting the health of chiidren, vulnerabie populatiotis, and alJ comniunity membeasis of xtffnost impo:dance,

4. Aceountability !n Deeision-Malcing:
o Irequesttheestablishrnemofacomtnunityadvisoryboardthatincludesresidents, environmental experts, aiid city officials to oversee the environmental aspectsof the project. "Ibis wallensure accountabUity and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the pmject's impacts.

5. AdeilaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRaii)toremaiiiinplaeei
0 I StrOngiyui'ge the Cit/ t0 keep the K rail ClOSed tO all traffic. Removing the K barrierwili likely leadtoincreasedvehic!eemissions,furtherdegradin@ airquality.

I request a compreherisiveair quality assessmento understandthe potential health impacts onresidents. Additionally, I advocatefor noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise polhition levels if the barrier is remo'ved, Engaging health and environmental experts to analyze theseimpacts is essential,
rgnature
Itrustthat you wifI give tbeseconcerns the attention tliey deserve, 31><th
Date:
155
OPPOSITIONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
x u hrrva amopposingthe lOl30AdellaProject(ffie
"Project") Below, I have out}inedmy teasonsforopposing andcort'espondingreqis to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmentai Testjng:
o JrequestthatthedeveloperconductathomughEnvironmentaihnpactAsgessment (EIA) befoiaethe Project is approved.This assessment*ou!d evaluateall potential environn>entafeffects, including air quality, noise pollirtion, and traffic impacts. l be]ievetb,attheproja;'tshouldnotbequalified asexempt tinderCEQACategorical Exemption under section 15332 (Clags 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may rasult in signifimt efFectsrelating to tidic, noise, air qmity, or wat.erquality. If this mnot true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report tmt provesthe above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issuesi a
o iseekdetai}edteportsonpastoontarninatlonissuesassociatedwiththeprqiectsite and howthese will beaddressed.Speciflmiy, I would like to know what testswill be eonduoted, which submancesare of mnoern, and how clean-up measuresw'll ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show funber testing doneafter 8/}7,f202].

3. OngoSixgEnvironmentaJ Monitoring:
o ] proposethe estabiishrnentof a plan for ongoinH environmenta) monitomg throughout the construction and operational pbases.This pJarishould outline how soil vapormoriitoriug win be conductedpost-construction and include contingency plaris if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building peitnit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerabie popu}ations, and all community members is of utmom impoitarice,
4, Aceountability in Decision-Making.
o l reqtiest the establishment of a commu'nity advisory board ihai Thicludesresidents, environmental expeits, and city officials to overseethe environmental aspectsof the pm:)act,This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in inonitoring the project's impacts.

5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRaiJ)tormnaininplace:
o EstrongIy urge the city to keep the K tail c!od to a!I traffic. Removing the K baier willlikely lead to tnedvehicleenussions, further degyadiitgairquality.

Irequest a compreheasiveair quality assessmento undarstandfhe potential health impacts OJIresidents.AdditionalEy, I advocatefor iioise level testingto evaluate the effects of increased tc flow and fox ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and emiironmental experts to analyze theseimpacts is essential.
l ttmttbatyou svill glve theseconcernsthe atterrtioh they deserve, Signature
sl>rtx><
Date:
t3,'7 156
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECI'
Prqiect")Below,I haveoutlinedmyreasonsfor opposingandcorrespondingrequemsto consider changiq my opposition:

1. Comprehensive EnvironmentaJ Tmitjug:
o JrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentallmpactAssessment (EIA) before the Projectis approved. Thisassessment should evaluateal! poteritial envimnmental effects, inchidirig air quality, noise poilution, and traffic impacts. I beJievethat the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQACategorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Deveiopmental Projects). Approval of the project y result i significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, 1 would Iike to receive the comprehensive report thatproveg the above mtrue.

2. Transpacy on Contamiation Issues: a
o tseekdetailedrepomonpastcontaminationtssuesassociatedwiththeprojectsite and how these will be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know whattests will be conducted, which substanoes axe of concern, and how clean-up measures wil} ensuresoi! and gromdwater saf.e'ff, As tbe Goo Trgker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021,

3. Ougoing Envb"onmentaJ Monitoring:
o I propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the constmctiort arid operational phases, Thig plan should outline how soi} vapormonitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if yapor issuesare detecteddurin@ testiry at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populatioti'g, and all communiiy members is of utmost importance,
4, 4rpmmtqhility ff!l Decision-Making:
o i reqwst the establishment of a comanunity advisory board that includes residents, enviromne.nta} expens,arid city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in moriitoring theproject! jmpacts.

5. AdellaAve.ConcreteBatrter(KRajl)toremaininplaee:
o I strorigly urge the city to keep the K ril clozd to all traffic. Removing the K barxierwU!likeiy leadto increasedvehicieemissions,furtherdegradinBairquality. l request a comprehensive air quality assessment to undarstandthe potentia} health impacts on residents, Additioi'mly, ! advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increa'sed traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollution Feversif ihe barrier is removed. Engaging health and envtronmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

I ti'ust that youwill give these conwu the attention thay deserve, Signature Date:
157
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO iOl30 ADELLA
correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:

Sokicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada, Esta evalxiaci6n debe e'valuar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la ca!idad del aire, la contaniinaci6ri acustica y los irnpactos en cl lrAfico. Creo que el proyecto CEQA,
lThOdeberia caiificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica dc la segii lasecci6n 15332 ((:'lase 32 - Proyectos de Desarroilo), La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos signifit'ativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la calida<l del aire o la calidad del agua, De no ser ast, me gustarfa recibir el informe complmo qrie lo demuestre. 2, Transparencia sobre Problernas de Cot'itamixiaci6n:
8 Busco informes detallados sobre problen'ias de contamixiaci6n anteriores asociados Call el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordar,m. Especfficainente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pmebas se realizarAn, cuAles sustaiicias son preocupantes y c6mo las mcdi*las Geo
de limpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Tracker no muestra pme'bas adicionales reaIi;a,adas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Anibiental Coratinuo:
@
durante
Propongo
ias
el
fases
esta)lecin'iientode un plan liara el mor.iitoreoambiental continuo de construcci6n y ciperaci6n. Bste plan a.ebedetallar c6mo se rea!izarA el monitoreo de vapor cle suelo despu6s de la cohstrucci6ii e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectaii problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salad de 10Snifios, Ias l'iob1aciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de m;Axima impoitai'icia.

4. ResponsabilidadenlaTomiideDecis:iones:
)6 Solicito el establecinniento de un consejo asesor con'imitario que incluya a residenteis, expertos en medio anibiente y funcionarios dc la ciudad para supervisa.r los aspectos ai'iibientaJes del proyecto. Esto gatantizar4 la tendici6n de cuentas y brindai'A a los residentcs bu'iaVOZ en (51rnonitoreo tie kos impacfos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adclla Ave. permanecerh en su lughr:
@ Urjo
Levantar
encarecidamenle
la bairera del K
a la ciudada maiitenerel K rail ce'i-i'adoa todotrafico, probablemcnte conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehiculos, da@radando atxn tnAs ]a caliaad de) aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n imegral de la calidad det aire para comprcnder los posibles 'ii'iipactos en la salxid de lloOsS ree;%idl70iJSte,se,lAaduennle\lstO, aeblol geol.lpluoJroreaaefizha,<,?liC50ueybaps01delunliv niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si sc levanta la barrera. Bs escncial involucrar a expeilos en salud y medio ambicnte para analizar eistos impactos.

Conflo en que darAn a estas preocupaciones la ai.cnci6n que merecen, Gyc.xH*-\xb'roz,ffil&hp
Fitma 3 " Feclia
(,3 -5'P>S
l!"l 158
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELL,A PROJECT
I g Ca!sfi(>v4v amopposingthe 10130AdellaProject(the g,l "Project") Below, l have outlined my reasons for opposin@and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

L Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
z .[request,lyatthedevelopet conduc .[ request, tlyat the developet conduct a thorough En'vironmental ImpactAssessment (BIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate al) potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts.I belicye tltat the pro,ject should not be quatified as exempt under CBQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may rcst'ilt in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quaJity, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the con'iprehensive repoit that proves the above untrue.

2. Triinsparency on Containination 'issues:
q :[ seek detai!ed repoits on pam contamination issues associated with the project site and liow tliese witl be addressed. Specifically, I would like to know wliat tests wili be conducted, which substances are of concem, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. AS the Geo Tracker does i'iot show ftu'ther tcsting done aft.er 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
z I liroposetlie estabiishmcnt of a plaii for ongoingeiwironmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational pliascs. This plaii sliould outline how soi) valior moxiitoring wil! be coriducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the liealth of children, yulnerable poprilations, axid aJl community members is of utmost importaiice.

4. Accoiintattility in Decision-Making:
z l requesttlieestablish'iricnt of acoi'nn'itinityadvisoryboarcl(hatixicludesresidents, environmental expetlS, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. Tliis will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring tl'ie project's inipacts. -

5. Adella ,Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
z l
barrier
strongly
will
urge
likely
the
leadto
cityto
increased
keeptheK rai}c)osedtoalltraffic.RernovixigtheK vehicle emissions, further degrading air quality. 1 request a compreheiisive air quality assessment to understand the potential hea(tli impacts on residents, Additionally,Iadvocate for noise level testing to evaluate tlie effects of increased traff-sc flow and for ongoing n'ioriitoring of air and noise pollution levels if (he barrier is re'i'noved. Engaging health and enyironmental expeIts rOanalYze tliescinll)aCtS }S esse!ltttala
l trust tl'iat you will give these conceriis the attei'ition ti':ieydeserve, X)J, Z:,,.u=
Signature
Date:
t'tO 159
OPPOSII'iON TO 10130 ADF,I,LA I)ROJECT
I Martr:> Cos-4eLnos am opposing the ]Ol30Adella Project (the <'Project") Below)Ihave outlixied my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests [:o consider chanting my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environxnental Tcstixig:
y I reqriest tliat the deve.ioper conduct a tliorough Eiaivironmental {mpact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potent'al environmemat effects, including air qyiality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorica) Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to tinffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive tl'ie comprehensive repott that proves (he above unlrue. 2, Transparency OJI Contamination Issues:
,/ l seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated witli the project site and liow tl'xesewill be addressed. Specificaliy, I would like to knoui what tests will be condticted, whicl'i substaiices are of concern, and how clean-up measures wil) ensure soil aiid groundwater safcty. As the Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3, Ongoing Enviyomnental Monitoring:
p; I proliose the estal'ilisl'u'tx'rrt of a plan for ongoing en'vironmental monitoring tliroughotit the constiauction a.ridcperationat pliases. 'T'his plan should out}ine bow soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include coxitingeaicy plaits if vapor iSSues are de(ected duriitg testing at tbe buildixig peru'iit stage, Pro(ecting the i'iealtlt of children, vulnerabic populations, and all con'xmunity mcmbers is of utmost importance.

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
y l request the eslablishment of a community advisory boaradthat inciudes residents, environmental expeits, axic'lcity officials to oyersee the environn'xental aspects of tI'ie project. This will ensure accountability axtd prrivide residents with a voice ii'i monitoring the project's impacts.

5. AdellaAve.Concretel3arrier(KRaiJ)toremaininpJace:
4 I mongly tnge the city to keep the K rai} closed to all taffic. Removing tlie K barrier wilt lil=.ely leact to increased vel'iicie einissions, further degrading air quatity, Ji'equest acomprehensive air quality assessrrtenltounderstaridthe potential health itnpacts on residents. Additionally, l advocate for noise Level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow ai'id for ongoing inonitoring of air aiid noise pollution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging healtli and envirotxmentat experts to analyze these impacts is essential.
} 'mist that you will give tl'iese concerns tlie attention [1"ieydeserve.

Signature
ova/y-t /g-b';H;"'
Date:
l'(t 160
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I Y'vs"= "'Ag""' amopposingthe )0130AdellaProject(the
"Project") Below, I have outlinedmyreasons foropposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmenta} Testing:
o ( request that the developer conduct a thomugli Environinental Impact Assessment (E,IA) before the Project is approved, This assessment should evaluate ali potential environmental effects, inchtding air quality, noise poJlutiori, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption urxder section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may resultin si@tn&ant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. ff this is riot tnie, l would like to receive the mmprehensive report that proves the above untrue,

2. Transparency ori Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed 'repoxts on past contamination issues associated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifiealiy,Iwould )ike to know what tests will be conducted, which substarioes aiaeof concern, and how clean-up measiires will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As ttie Geo Tracker does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmsntal Monitorjng:
o I proposethe establishmentof a plan for ongoin@ environinentalmonitoring througliout the construction and operational phases, This plan should outline how soit vapor monitorirxgwill be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the h6alth Of cliiJdren, vulnerable populations, and all commtinity members is of utmost importance
4, Accountability in Decision-Malting:
o I request the establishment of a cormnunity ad'visory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the pro3ect.'I'bis will ensureaccountability andprovide residents with a voice in monitoring the pro3eci's impacts,
5, Adetla Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o l stronglyurgethe city to keepthe K rail closedto all traffic. Removin@ theK barrierwill likely leadto increasedvehicleemissions,fuitherdegrad% airqua]ity. } re'quest a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, I adyocate for noise ievel testing to evaluate the effects of increasedtraffic flow and for ongoin@ monitoiing of air and xioise pollution levels if tlie bartfer is removed, Erxgaging health arid environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

I tust that you will give these concerns the attention they deserve.

Date:
t'l2. 161
OPPOSITiONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
44Projeet")Below,l have outlined aiy reasonsfor opposingand mrresponding reqtists to consider ehariging my opposition:

1. Comprehensjve Eny!iroimxental Testing:
o Irequestthatth=adeveloperconductathorougliEnviromnentalImpactAesesgment (EIA) before the Projed is approved.Tbis assessmentshotnd evaluateal} potential envixynmentat effects,includirz air quality, iioise pollutiorh, andtraffic impacts. l believethatthe project shouldnot be qualified ra exempt underCEQA Categorical Exemption under mtion 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects).Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quaiit>i If tbis is not true,1 would }ike to receive the comprehensive repoit that proves The above untrue,

2. Transpareng on Contaiaination Isauesx
o }seekdetailcdreportsonpastcontarnionissuasassociatedwiththeprojeetsite andhowtliese will be addressed.Specifica!ly, I would like to know whattests wili be condttcted, which substanwsare of concerrl and how c}eari-tipmeasureswi}I enguresojl and groundwater sat'ety.As the G60 Tracker does not show further testing done affer 8/!7/2021.

3. Ougotng Envjronmental Monito*gi
o J propose the estabtishment of a plan for ongoing enviromnental monitoring throughout the coutruction and operational phases,This plan s!'mu}doutline how soil vapor moitoring wii? be conductedpost-construction atid inc!ude oontingency plansif vaporissuesare detected during testin@at the buildmgpermi! stage, Protecting the health of children. vulnerab!e populations, and all community membersis of utmost importance
4, Accountability in Decision-Making
o 1requestthe establishment of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspectsof the pmject,This will ensure accountabiJityand provide residents with a voice iri moriitoring the pmject's impam.
5, AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRnjl)toyemajninplace
o Sstroriglyuse the city to keep the K rail closed to alJtraffic, Removing the K barrieywili iikeiy Ieadto increasedvehicleemissions, further degradinz airquality.

I re4uesta compr*ensiw airquality assessmento understandthe potential health impacts onresidents,Additionally, Iadvocate for noise level testing to evaluatethe effests of increased traffic flow and for ongoirxg monitoring of air and noise pollution ievels if the barrier is removed. Bngaging health and environmental experts to analyze theseimpacts is essential.
l tmstthatyou wifl give theseconcerns the attention they deserve, Date:
l'O 162
OPOSI(,(aN AL PROYECTO ]0$30 ADELLA
corresp6ndienies para eonsiderar cam6:aiatni op-osi6'i'6-n:

1. Pniebas Arnbiexitales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que e} desarro!}ador realice una Hvaluaci6n de Impacio Ambiental (HIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implernente ct'ia!quier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evafuar todos 108 posibies efectos ambientales, incluyendo la ealidad del aire, la contam:maci6n act'istica y los impactos en eJ trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberia caJificar como exento bajo )a E'xenci6n Categ6ricn da la CEQA,seg6nlasecci6n 15332(Ctase32-ProyectosdeDesarrollo).Luaprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos significaiivos eri el trffico, el ruido, la calidad deI aire o ta ca)idad de! agua. De no ser asi, me gustaria recibir el informe cornpieto que lo demuestre.

2. Transparencis sobre Problemas de Contsminaci6n:
o Busco informes delay}adossobre prob?emasde contaminaci6n anteiiores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo seabordarAn.Especificsuneffte, me gustaria saber qu6 I:iruebasse realizarAn, curiessustaiicias Sailpreocupantes y c6mo las medidas de lixnpiey,aasegurarii la se@iridad del suelo y dcl aguasubterriea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebasadicionales rea]izadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoree Ambienta! Coaitinuo:
o Propoxigo el estab)eciiniento de un plan para e! monitoreo an'ibiental continuo duraiyte las fases de coiistmcci6n y operaai6n- Este plan debe deta{lay ct5ttio se reaiizaiTh ei monitoi'et> de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se *tectaii prob?emas de vapor duraxxtc 2as pruebas en la etapa de perrmso de construcci6n. Proteger la mlud de los nirios, las poblaciones vu)nerables y todos )os miembros de ta comunidad es da maxima imporeancia.

4. Responsabilidad an IU Toma de Deeisiones:
o Solicito e.l establccinxicnto & uu coiisejo ascsor coinunitario que incluya a resideaites, cxpertos en medio ambiente y fuucionarios de la ciudad para supervisar (OSaSpeCtOSan'ilyieritales del proyccto. Esto garantizar& la relldiCi6n de t,uentaS 7 brindarA a Jog residentes una voz cn el monitoreo de ios impactos del pro)iecto. 5, I.ia barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permaneeerffi en ski jugar:
o Urjo encarecidatt.ente a la ciudad a n'iantener e! K rail cerrado a todo trAfico. [yevanlar )a barrera del K probal>lemente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vebfculos, degradando aun mi Ja ca!idad del aire. Solicito 11na evaluaci6n inte@aa} de IEIcalidad de) aire para comprendcr lag posibles iinpactos an la salud de los residentesAdem.!u, abogo por rea)izar pruebas de niveles de niido para evahiar los efectos del aun'iento en el flujo da trAfico y por un tnonitoreo continuo de 108 niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera. ES csenciat invo)ucrar a expeitos en salad y n:iedio amlziente para analizar eStOSimpactos.

Confio en que darh a estas preocupaciones la atcnci6ri que merecen. 163
OPOS1CI6N AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
\o '74\e.,heza,, !'rda,lo5
(el "Proyecto"), A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razones pmareaOopoOnng:rtnaleP)ffi+{asecso'o)ilcO correspondientes para considerar cambiarmi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivass
o Solicito que el desarmliador realice una Bvaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva ates de que se, implemente cualquier unidad si.vtomatizst%.. Egta evaluaci6n debe evaiuar todos los posibies efegtos ambientales, incIuyendo la calidad del aire, la contatninaci6n ac6stica y los inipactos en el trThm. Creo que eI ptoy8o no deberia caiificar corryo exento bajo la Bxenci6n Categ6rica de la CBQA, gegtinlasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32- Proyectos deDesarro)ko). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto.podtfa tener efectos significativos en el tAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua. De txo ser asf, me gustata mibir e] informe completo que lo demtiestre.

2. Transparences sobre Problemas de Cantaminaci6n:
o Buscoinformesdetaitadosmbreproblernasdecontaminaci6nanterioresaso6iados mu el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especfficamerxte, me gustar{a saber qu6 pruebas se tea!imm, cuAle.s sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo Jas medidas de limpieza aseB la se@irxdad del sueioy de)aguasubterr&nea.Dadoque el Geo Trackerno muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/201.

3. MonitoreoAmbientaiConttuuos
.o Propongo el emabiecimiento de un plan para et monitoreo ambiental continuo durante ias fages de constmcci6n )i operaci6n. Egte plan debe detallar c6mo se reakizarAel monitorm de vaporde sueio despu6s de iaconsti6n eincluir plam de contingencia gi se detectari problemas dei vapor durante las pmbas eu la etapa de pemuso de constmcci6n. Proteger la salud de 105 os, las poblacionea vulnerablesytodos losmiembros de la oomuitidades demmmimportancia,

4. Rpqponaoailidad cn la Toma de Deeisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un conmajo asesor comunitatio que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y funcionarios de laciudad para supervisar )os aspectos aiubientales del proyecto, Esto gararitizarA la rendtci6n de cuentas y brindarA a log residentes una voz s el monitoreio de los irnpaetos del proyedo,

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecer6 en su lugar:
o Urio encarecidaiente a la ciudad a mantenerel K rail cerradoa todo bAfico.

Levantar la barrem del K pmbablemente conducirA aun aumento en ias emisiones de vehfculos, degradaridoall!l robs la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n linOtSegThrmaldedenila8.cAaldidadema,dse,l&baioregOpparoarcorm 108 efectos dei aumento en el flujo ds tco y por uri moriitoreo continuo de ios niveles de contamiriaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera, ES esencial involucrar a expertos en saludy medio mbieiTheparaanalizar egtos tmpactos.

Conflo en que dgk a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen, Firma
03- 25 2,5"
Fecha
164
oposicx6u .=u,pnomc'ro 10130 ADELLA
Yo -'[-lllMd! <'S:rYalj{) meopongoa]ProyectolOl30Adella (el "Proyecto"), A contiHuaci6n, l'ie expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes paraconsiderarcambiar mi oposii6n:

1. Pruebag Ambienta!es Exhaumvasa
o
SoeXblicuitsotl1\qauemeltedsesdarre oqJluaedcisrerealice unaEvca}uuaalqciu61nerdeulmidpadactmot evaluaci6ri debe evaluar todo'amWlsempoensi'beles ef'ectos ambienta!es, inc)uyendo la pcacoliydeaddodenlOaiidce,blaedcaongtai,l=ibcnomacotisaticaentyC6rrelcoaqduee elal CEQA, segtin }asecci6n 15332 (Ctase32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). Laapxobaci6n adjeilporoWeoc*to, bpoddrdmelteaneguraefDecetonsoi8genriafisca,ti;eospenSalaecalmidadmp,dteol que lo demueate,

2. Transparencia sabre Problemas de Contaminaci6n.
o Busco iiorrnes detal!ados sobxt probleanas de contaminaci6n anteriores asoe'iados son cl sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificamente, me gustatia saber qu6 pmebas se rea!izm'&n, cubes sustancias
deiinnpiezaagegurarmiaseguridadde.isuelosoy'!e"leoacguu'amsu'beq'ue'el Geo Tracker no muestta pmebas adicionalm realizadas despu6s del 27/08/2021.

3. Moaitoreo Ambiemal Continuo:
.o Pmpongo el establecimiento de un pian para el monitoreo ambieiital continuo durante las fases de coristrw,i6n y operaci6n, Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el rnoitoreo de vapordesuelo despu6s de iaconslrucci6n e jncluir planes de contingencia si se detedm problemag de vapor dur'ante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de eonstrucci6n. Proteger la salud de 10S niis, ias poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembms de la comunidad es demAxima irnportancia, 4, Responsabilidad exala Toma de Deeigioxxes:
o Solicito el establecimiento da un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos eri medio ambiente y funcionaiios de }a ciudad para supervisar ios aspectos ambientaJes del proyedo, &to garan6zai la reridici6n de cuentas y briridar!i a los residentes una voz en el monitoreo de log impactos del proyecto,

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Av& permaneeerA en su lugar:
o Urjo enmrecidarnente a la ciudad a rnantener el K rai! cerrado a todo ttAfiw.

Levmitai: la barrera del K probablemerite conducirA a up aurnento en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradando im mAs la calidad del ire. Solicito una evaluaci6n linotselgr.sa}lddene,,las.cMaliem:,[abairogeopaproarcr momlpzrMenpdreurelboasgp,osniblv]eesleir.las,a}vuiduar" 105 efectos del aumento en el flujo de trfflco y por un monitoreo contin'uo de log niyeles de contaminaci6n dei aire y del ruido si se levanta Ia barxera. Es esencial tirvoluctar a expertos an salud y medio ambieme paraanalizar emxs impactos, Conflo en que datm a estas preocupaciones la aterxci6n que merecen.

Firma Fecha
S-j,r->S'
l% 165
oyosxcMtAL PRO\ECTO ioiso ADEI,LA
correspondientes para considerar cambiar m4 oposici6n:

1. Pruebos Ambienta!ea Exliaustjvas:
o Solicito que ei desanollador reatice una Bvaluaci6n de Impaeto Ambientai (BiA) exhaustiva antes de que se imp)ernente cua}quier unida<i sntommizpdq, Esta eva)uaci6n debe evaluar todos Ios posib!es efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad dei aire, la contarninaci6n acamica y ios impactos en el tr6figo. Creo que el proyecto no deberfa caEifsm corno exento bajo ia Exenci6n Categ6rjca de la CBQA, seg'6nlasecci6n 15332 (Ciase 32- Proyectos deDesarrolJo). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podr €atener efectos sigriificativos en e! tr6fico, el t'uido, }acalidaddei aire o !a calidaddel aBua, k rio ser asi, megustar{a recibir eJ informe co.mpleto que Jo dernaestre.

2. Traxispareneis sobiaeProbjemas de Contaminaei6n:
o Buscoinfotmesdetalladossobreproblemasdecoritamtnact6nantertoresasociadog con el sitio deJ proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especf&'amente, me gustaria saber qu6 pmebas se realizari, curiessucias son preocupantes y c6mo Ias medidas de limpiei asegurayAn la seguridad del suelo y del agm subterrhea, Dado que el (J60 Trackerno muestra praebas adiciona!es realizadas despu6s de} 17/08f2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Contirbuo:
.o Propongo el establecimiento de un p!axx para eI monitoreo arnbiental continuo dutnte las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plari deibe detallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreode vaporde suelo despu6s de iaconsft'ucci6n einctuir planes de coiitirigericia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante ias pruebas en is etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteget' }a salud de los nifios, las pobiacionea vulnanb!esy todos 10Smiernbros de la cornunidad eisde mAxima importancia.

4. Regponsabibdad an la Toma da Deeisiones:
o So}icito el establecitmento de un oonsejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos eii medio arnbieritey funcionarios de ia ciudad para supervisar )osaspectosambientalesdelproyecto.Esto@arantizarA la rendici6nde cuentasy brindarA a )os residentes unavoz enel monitoreo da fog impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o tJrjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo Mfico.

Levantar ia bamira del K probablemente conducirA a m aumento en lag emisiones de veh€cu)os, degradando aun ats la mlidad del ire. Solicito tins evaluaci6n integrat de )a calidad deJ aire para comprender ios posibles impactos en la salud de losremdentes. AdernAg, abogoporreaipruebas denivelesdetudo paraevaluar los efectogdel aumerxtoenel fluJode trAficoy por un monito*o continuodelos nive!es da coinaci6n de4 aire y dei ruido si se levanta la 'barma. Es egencial involut.rar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente pm analizar estos impactos, Conflo en que dark a estas preocupaciones ia atenci6n que merecea FJrma
p 3 ;)-S- -lS
Fecha
('\71 166
OPOSICI6N AL puoyxcro 10130 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto'). A continuaci6i:i, he expuesto inig razones para -opon-erme y Ias solicitudes oorrespondientes para considerar cambxar mi oposiei6n:

1. Pruebag Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desamol)ador reiice una Evaluaci6n de Irnpacto Ambiental (EiA) exhaustiva aiites de que ge implernente cualquier unidad sittrirpniizndH, Bsta evaluaci6n debe eva!uar todos }os posibles efectos ambienta)es, incluyendo la calidad *] aire, Ia containinaci6n acustica y los impactos eri el trAfico. Creo que el U'rBo('e,",osengotmdfeabsee'ccai6cnall'fi53'32 (oComlasoe e3X2"ffiPrfOoybecajOtosladeBDxeesncarr'6 Wd.eleporolyagcatol1&&poddrfdaelteangeuraefThectonsosisgnierU&f,a que lo dernuestre,

2. Transparencm sabre Probtemax da Contaminaeion.
o Busco itifotmes detauadossabre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asoaados con el sitio de! proyecto y o6mo se abordarhii. Especfficamente, me gustarfa saber )lel6tipmmpeiezab'a"segreurar"m\'a:ioeu:'uriesdad81'd'e!:"taie'tosoy"!el Geo Trglcer no muestra pmebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monjtoreo Ambieotat Continuo:
.o Propongo el establecimiento de un pIan para el monitoreo ambiental continuo durante Ias fases de construcci6n y opeizi6n. Este plan debe tJetallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s delaconstrucci6n e incluir planes dbeoopentingsoenc*ia si00sne8 detecclto,ann pPrombtleegmaers,d:v,apudorddeuranlOstemlasfetalOym vuineibles y todog log miembros de la comunidad es de mmmh impnmincis,

4. Responsabilidad en la Toma de Deeistones:
o Solicito e! establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio atril>iente y funcionarios de la ciudad para gupervisar los aspectos ambzentales del proya;"to. Bsto garantizarA la readii6n de cuentas y b*darA a log residenteg una voz en el monitoreo de lag impactos del proyecto.

S. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permaneeer& en su iugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a ka ciudad a tnantcner el K rail sero a todo ttffi Levantar la barrera dei K probablemente conducirA a un aumento enlas emigiones da vehtculos, degradando ami s la caiidad del aire. Solicito um evaluaci6n log efectos del aumento eri el flujo da trAfico y por un monttoreo co.titinuo de los nivejes de contaminaci6n de} aire y de) ruido si se levantn la barrera, Bs egencial invoiucrar a expertos en mudy medio ambiente paraanalizar estos impactos.

Confio en que dark a sates preocupaciones la atettci6n que merecen, Fir
Q(5,ro 0 3 - ,-7,.,5)- -2-S
Fecha
167
orosxcx6shtpuoy;gcro ioisohnxtth
el '!'roye"). A ffintLiiuaci6rx, he expuesto inis razones para 6ponerme y fas solicitiides correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o 8olicito que e! desarroilador realice atia Evduaci6n de lmpacto Arnbiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se imp)etnente ctmlquier imidad autornatizada, Egta evaluaci6n debe eva!uar todos log posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la ca?idad de] ire, la contaminaci6n ac6stica y }os impactos en el trAfico. Creoque e! proyecto iio deberta calificar como exento bajo !a Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA,seBmlasecci6n 15332(Ciase 32 - Proyectos de Desarro}lo}. Laaprobaci6n d;1!eporoWeciol,paoddzdfaelteneuraefDecetonsosSigetriiuficfrtm qtie lo demuestre.

2. Transpaineia sobra Problemss de Contamjnaci6n.
o Buscoinformesdeta}ladossobreproblernasdecontarninaci6rianterioresasociados coo el sitio deJ proyecto y c6mo se abordari. Especfficamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pnxebas se realizari, cubes sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de Jimpie:y,aasegurark }a seguridad del sueio y del agua subtermea.Dado que eJ Geo Ttacker no muestra pnw.bas adicioria!es realizadas bspu6s del 17/08!2021,

3. Moaitoaoeo Ambiental Conffnuo:
.o Propongo el emablec!miento de un p!an para el monitoreo ambiental continue durante Jas fases de constncci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se reaiizarAel monitoreode vaporde suelo despu6s de laconstrucci6n einclutrplanes de contingencia gi se detectan prob)emas devapor dtmuJe las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de consticcirm. Proteger la saiud de los niflos, las poblaciones vulnerab}esy todos los miembros de la comtinidad esde mbimtmportancia.

4. ResponsqbtJ!dad Pff [2€ Toma de Deeisioneg:
o Solicito ej estabiecimieuto de un consejo asegr comunitario que inc)uya a residentes, expertos en medio ambientey funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los a@ectos arnbientalesdel proyecto,Bdo garantizarAla rendici6ride cuentas y brtndarA a log residerites unavoz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La mrrera (l( Rail) de Adella Ave. permaneeerA On su !ugar:
o Urio encarecidamentea la cii a mantenerat K rail cerradoa todo trAfico.

Levaritar Ia barrera del K probablemente conducirA a uri aumerito an ias emisiones de vehtgulos, degradando edm rub la calidad del ire. So)icito tuia evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aim pga cornprender gospogibles impactos en la sa de llo0ssrdeseicdteonsted:.lAaduem?gltO,aabolgoel npollJroredaleizauX!:e\bapsordeunniv;oJensl niveles de coxitaininaci6n del aire y de) ruido si se levanta la barera. Es esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambiente para analizarestos impactos, Confio en a estas preocupaciones la aterici6n que merecen. 168
oromcr6v AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
Y(e!01"PQ!'to"').eAl mlinauaciJn',(Ae'!l 'l <:isramnesmparaeopopoOnngoaan"iePyr0ras corresponfflentes para considerar cameX!i'J" oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicita que el desarro!iadorreatiezuna E'valuaci6n de !mpacto Ambientat (EIA) eex,hauusoti%vna aanebtesevdealtqiaraetod8eo's'?lsempoensi1belecs"aelf%cuti:n'b"iedntalaue's,minahcl'uyen calidad&1 atre,lacontaminaci6n acustica>ilos impactosenel trAfico.Creoque ei ptoyecto no deber[a calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de {a.

CEQA, seztuylasecci6n15332(Clase32- ProyectosdeDesmro}lo).Laaprobaci6n del proyectopodz[atene" efectossignificativos en el trA&o, el tuido, laca?idaddel aire o la calidad del aria. De no ser asf,me gustarfarecibir el informe compieto que lo demuestre.

2. Transpaioeneia aobre Probimnas de Centaminaci6u.
o Buscoinfotmesdetal!adossobreprobternasdeconii6nanterioresagociados cori e! sitio dej proyecto y c6mo se abordari. Espec&amente, me gustar!a saber qu6 pruebas se reauzari, cuakes sustancias son preocupaines y c6mo Jasmedidas de limpieza aseguraii Ia seguridad deJ sueIo y del agua subterrkea, Dado cl Geo Trackerno muestra pniebas adicionales reali:as despu6s del (7/08/20!'1.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
.o Propongo el establecixiento de un plan para cl monitoreo ambtental continuo dnrante ias fases de constmcci6n y operaci6n. 'Este plan debe detallar c6mo sei realizarA el monitoreo de vapor de sueJo despu6s de la construoci6ne incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas eu la ctapa de permiso de construcci6n, Protezer la salud de los nifios, }as poblaianes vulnerables y todos 10$ miembros de ia comuiiidad es de rnima impoitancia, 4, Naspnmm}iilMxtd pn la Toma de Deeisiones;
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio arnbientey fungionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspeatos ambientales del proyecto, Bsto gatizarA la rendici6ri de cuentas y btiridarA a los residentes una voz enel monitoreo da los impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rait) de Adellst Ave. permaneeerA mi su }11gar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trA&o Levaniat la barrera del K probablemente conducir& a un aumento en las emtsiones de vehfculos, degradando aan is la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para comprender kos posibles impactos enla salud de niveies de contarninaci6n dei aire y del ruido si se levanta la bartera, Es esenciai involurar a experlos eri salud y medio mbiente paraannlizar estos impactos Confio en que dark a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen, Pffla
S- 2 '5=-,2o(:2,5a
Fecha
169
oposicMi AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA

1. Pruebas AmbientaRes Exhaugtivas:
o Solicito que el desarrol}ador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Arnbiental (F,IA) exhaustiva aiites de que se imp!emente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaiuar todos los posibies efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del ire, Ia contarninaei6n ac6stica y los impactos en el trAfico, Creo que ei proyecto no deber(a calificar como exento bajo h Exenci6n Categ6rtca de la CEQA,segtslasecci6:n 15332(C!ase32-ProyectosdeDesarivllo).Laaprobaci6n del pmyecto podrfa tener e&'ctos signific,ativos an el tMco, ei ruido, la calidad dei aire o la caiidad dej a@u De no serasf,me @usterfarecibir el int'ormeoompleto que }o demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre I%'oblemas de Contaminaci6ni
o Bizinfor'rnesdetalladossobreproblemasdecoritanxinaci6nanterioreaasociados coo eSsitio dei proyecto y c6mo se abordarm, Especfficarnente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebas ge realizarm, cuaes sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo !as medidas de limpieza age@urarm )a seguridad del suelo y del agua subtet6nea. Dado que el Geo Trackerno muesta prtiebas adicionales palizadas despu6s del 17/08/2(al.

3. Monito Ambientu €Continuo:
.o Propon@o el establecirmentode un plan pga el morfftoreo ambiental continuo durante ias fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este p]an debe detallar c6mo se realizarAel monitoreode vaporde suelo despu6s de taconstrucci6xie incluir planes de corttingencia si se detefflan probiemas de vapor durante lag pmbas en {a etapa de penniso de consticci6n. Proteger la salud de los nifios, !as pobiaciones vulnerables y todos los mienxbros de la comtintdad es de mhima importancja,

4. Rer+ponsabilidad en ia Toma de Decisioaies:
o Solicito el establecim?ento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a regidentes, expertos en medio ambiente y funcioriarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto, Esto garmitizarA !a rendici6n de cue y brindarA a 1051residemes tma voz en el monitoreo de los irnpactos del proyecto,

5. La barrera (K Rait) de Ade!la Ave. permaneeer6 en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamerite a ia ciudad a mantener e} K tail cerrado a todo trAfico.

Levmitar la bazrera del K probablemente conducirA a un auniento et>ias emisiones de vehiculos, degradando ah rnAs la oalidad del aire. So}icito una evaluaci6n ;tegral deia;i.dad 4elpfiepgacomprenderl.os piblesimpactosenlasffidde niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si ge ievanta ]a bartera, Bs esenciai irivolucrar a expertos en salud y medio arnbiente para analizar estos impactos Conffo an qtw dark a estas preocupaciones ia atenci6n que merecen.

Finna
c3 - 2 E>' 96;u;>'-
Feclm
tel 170
oposicx6n,ttpnomc'ro 10130ADELLA
corresp6ndientes para consibru cam6iar mi oposici6n:

1. Ptuebog Ambientales ExhaugtNvas:
o Solicito que el desgroliador realise una Eyaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustive antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad snj(ymmiy.ar'ls R!;!ta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos fos posibles efectos ambientaies, incluyendo la ca}idad del aire, }a contaminaci6n acastica y los impactos en el trfflco. Creo que el proyecto no deber[a califlcar como exento bajo la, Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segmlasecci6n 15332 (Ciase ':.2- Proyectos de Desarmil.o). Laaptobaci6n que Io demuestre,

2. Transparencia sobre ProbIemas da Contaminaei6n.
o Bugco informes detallados sobre probtemas de contaminacx6n antriore.i asociados con el sitio del pmyeoto y c6mo se abordarh. Especf&:amente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pmebas se realizari, cuAles sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurari la scguri&d de) suelo y del agua subterrAnea, Dado que ei Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales reaiizadas despu6s de} i7/08/2021. 3a Mantlfll'(!O Auifj;iulal Cunttnuo:
.o Propongo ei establecimiento da un pian para cl monitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fam de construcci6n y operaci6n, Este plan debe detal]ar c6mo sa reatizarAel monitoreode vaporde suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia ai se detectan problemas da vapor durarite b pruebas en }a etapa de permiso de coasticci6n, Proteger la salud de los nifios, ias poblacioms vuinerabies y todos log miembros de )acomuindad es de m irnpotancia.

4. Respohgabilidad en la Toma do Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimierito de un consejo asesor comunitario que inc}uya a residentes, expertos en medio ambientey furicionarios de la ciudad para supervisar Ios aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Egto garmitizarA la sndici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una voz en el monitoreo de los imp&os del pmyem.

5. La barrera (K Raii) de Adella Ave. permaneeer'A en su lugar:
o Urjo enesrecidamente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cet'rado a todo trffico.

Levmxtar ia barrera del K probablemerite conducirA at'in aumento en Iu etnisiones de vehfculos, degmando ah robs la calidad del aire, So}icito una evahmci6n ilnWtefflgr8alldeden.ias.cMalideamda,dseiabaiOrge0para Ormoml.pWreiipdnelrelboasspdoesnibllveesleimb8enp!iaaseaivtt,dudue 105 efectos de] aurnento en el :HuOjl'o de bBco y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de mntarnixiaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta la batrera. Es esencial involucrar u expertos en salud y medio ambiente para aiializar eslns impactos, Conf!o en que dar&'i a estag preocupaciones Ia ataici6ii que merecen, F
3 ,9,\ ,95;
t5'2,- 171
OPPOS.[TION TO 10130 ADEI,LA PROJECT
ProjE'(') IB!ol:,':l)tav: 'o\Otin(ed' my;"a:o":'s for oppoasming( apnpdo :'ollrgrej:peoiliOdili3igC rAeqdueellsats )trojceocn's(id'eer changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing: Testine:
* I request tl'>atthe developer conduct a thorough Environi'nentai impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approyed. This assessment should evaluate all potential environmental effects, iricluding air quality, noise poltution, and traffic ix'npacts, I believe that the project sliould not be quaii.fied as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-DeveiopmentaJ Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relatiiig to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I wouJd Jike to receive tlie comprehensive report that proves tlie aboiie untriie.
2, Transparency on Contamination lssties:
@ Xseek detailed reports all past coivtainination issues associated with tlie project site and how these will be addressed. Specifical)y,l would like o kiiow what tests wi!l be conducted, whictt sulistances ge of concem, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety- As the G(,O Trackcr does not show further testing done after 8/17/2021.
3, Ongoing Enviroximental ?!Ionitoringi
@ r propose tlie establishmentof a plait for ori@oing environmental monitoring througliout (lie cotistruction and operational phases. This plan should outtitie liow soi) vapor monitoring wUl be conducted post-construction and include continget'icy plaiis if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the healtl'i of chitdren, vulnerable populations, and all community ii'>embers is of utmost iniporcance,

4. Accountabili(y in Decision-Making:
* I request the establisJ'iment of a coi'nn'iunity aclvisory board tha.t ii'xcludes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmemal aspects of tlxe project. This wilt ensure accot'intability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.
5, Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (J( Rail) to remain in place:
q l strongly urge tbe city to ke)ep tbe K rail closed to all traffic. Removing tlie K barrier will tikely lead to increased yehicle emissions, fyirther degrading air quality. l request a comprehensive air qyia)ity assessment to understarxd the potential t'iealth impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow end for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pol}ution Jevels if thc barrier is re:inoved. Hngaging health and environmentai cxperts to analyze t}iese impacts is essential.
} trust that you wikl give tl'iese concerns the attention they deserve.

Sigiiature Date:
3)as-}
t'73 172
OP 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
I (.'fl VTh4!'tf(,x " ain opposing the 10130 Adella Project (the reaso'ns for opposing and corresponding requests to consider charigirxg my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testii'ig:
4! l request that ihe deveioper conduct a thorough Eiwironmental InahpactAssessment (El:A) before the Project is approved. This assessment sl'iould evaluate al) potentia? environmema) effects, including air quality, noise pollution, aiid traffic impacts. 1 lielieve that the project shorild not be qualified ELSexempt under CEQA Categoiictit Exemption under section15332 (Class32-Develolin"ienta! I)rojects).Approva} of the project may result in signif:'icam effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. 'if tliis is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report tliat proves tlie aboye untrue.

2. Transparency on Contaminatioxi IsSues:
0 I seek detaiied reports on past contan'iinittion iSSues associated with the pto,ject site and how these will bc addtaessed, Specifically, } would like to know what tests will be conducted, whicl'i substaiices are of concern, and IIOW clean-up measures wig] ensure soil aiid groundwater safey. AS the Geo Tracker does not show fuither testing done after 8/1 7/2021.

3. Ongoing Enviroximental Monitoring:
40 l propose the estalylishmen(: of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring tl'iroughout tl':teconstructioi"i and operational phases. Tliis plan should outline how soi) vapor monitoring wilt be conducted post-corxstruction and iiiclude contingeBcy plaxis if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting tlie health of clxildrcn, vilnerable populations, aiid all community members is of utmost importance.

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
* 'I request the establislaunent of a community advisory board fl'iat includes residents, environmental expcrts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. Tt'iis will cnsu.re accountability and proiiide residents witk'i a voice in monitoring tbe project's impacts.
5, AdellaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRai})toremaininplace:
* [ strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Rcn'iovitig t}ie K bairier will likely Leadto increased vebicle etnissioi'xs> further degrading air quality.

I request a comprehensive air quality assessment (o i.u'iderstattd the potential health impacts on residents. Additionalty, l advocate for noise level testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow aiid for ongoing monitoring of air aiid noise pollution levels if the bairier is removcd, Engaging liealth and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is essential.

I trust that you will give these concerns tlie attention tiiey deserve.

Date:b,hbl5
tG'! 173
OPPOSIIION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
roject") Below, I have outliuedmy reasonsforopposing andcorresponding tequests to consider changing my oppositiori:

L Comprehensive EnyiroixmehtaJ Testing:
o Jrequestthattbedeve}operconductaThomughEnvironmentalImpactAsgessment (BIA)beforetheProjectisapproved. Thisassessmentshouldevaluateal!potential environmentat effects, incIuding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I be[ievethat the projact shouldnot be qualified as exet underCEQACategorical Exemption under sedion 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of the pmject may result in significant eefeds relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water qua!ity.If"this is not Cruel would like to receive thecomprehensive report that proves the above untme,

2. Transparency on Contamination Issuesx '
o l seek detailed reports on past contamination issues associated with the projec.t site and howthege wi)i be addressed. Specificaily, I would like to ffiow whattegts ill be conducted, which substances are of conceiq and how clean-up masures wall ensure soiI arid grouridwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does not mow further testing done afffir 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monito:ring:
o I propom the establis'nmert of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring througliout the construction and operational phases. This plan ffitdd outlitie how soi} vapormonitoring will be conducted post-constmctionand include contingency plans if vapor is8ue8 are detected during testing at the building permit stage, Protecting the hea}th of children, vu]nerable populatioris, and all cotinity members ts of utmom importance.

4. Accountabllity in Deeision-Makingi
o I request the establisbment of a cornrnunity advisory board that includes residents, enviromrienta} experts, and city officials to oversee the environmenta) aspects of the project. This win erisure acmuntability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the pmject's impacts,

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I stronglyurgethe city to keepthe K raii closedto aft traffic, RemovinBtheK barrier wilk likeiy leadto inmmed ve}iicleemissions, further degtading airqity, I request a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health trnpactson residents,Additional[y,Iadvonte for noise !evel testing, to evaluatethe effects of increased traffic flow d for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pcil!ution levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmental expertsto analyzethese impacts is essential.

I tiustthatyouwill @iyetheseconcemstheauectionffieydeserve, Date:
5 z,.r-zo-,r
('7'5" 174
OPPOSITION TO iOl30ADELLA PROJECT
changing myopposition:

Comprehensive E'nvironmentai Testing
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughF,t"ivironmentalImpactAssesat (EIA)lyefotytheProjectisapproved. Thisassessmentshouldevaluateallpoterffial environmental effects, including air quaiity, noise pollution, and traffic impts. I believe that the project sliould not be qualified asexempt u'nderCEQACategorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in giificant effects reiating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, If' this is not tme, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untiue,

2. Trangpareney on Contamittation Issues:
o I seek aetailed reports on past eontarnttiationissues associatedwith the pyoject site and how thesewill be addressed,Specifically, l would }ike to know whattests will be condticted, which gances are of concerri, and how cleari-up meagureswill ensure soil and groundwater safety.AS the Geo Tmcket does not show further testing done der 8/27/2021.

3. Ongomg Envjronmental Monitoring:
o l propose the establishment of a plan for ongoing enviromnerbl monitoring througbout the construction and operational phases.This plan should outline how soil vapormonitoringwikl beconductedpost-constructionandincludeoontiqemy plansif vaporissuesaredetectedduringtestingat the build% pennitstage.

Protegting the heaIth o:f' childrerb vulnerable populations, and all community membei is ofutmost impoitance.

4. Accoiantabiiity in Decision-Maldng:
o l requestthe establishment of a community advisory board that includes residets, environmental experts, and city officials to overseethe environmental aspectsof ihe project, This will ensure acvuntability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the pro,iect'simpacts.

5. Adella Ave. Conerete Barrter (K Raid)to remain in placei o l strong!y urge the city to keep the K rail ciosed to all traffic, Retnoving the K batrierwil! likely leadto tncreamdvehic}eemissions, furthet deg,rad% airquality.

I reaquema comprehensive air quality assessmento understandthe potentiai health impacts on residents,Additional}y, I advocatefor noise level testing to eva}uatethe effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitomg of air and noise pollution levels if t'he barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmental experts toanalyzetliege impacts is essential.

I trust that you will give theseconcerns the attention they deserve, signJ# p" Date:
175
OPPOSITIONTO 10130ADELLA PROJECT
I Ql,lrt'5(-op 'afr Qo'J's a-Fl"bamopposingthel0130AdellaProject(the '4Project")Below,l have outlined my reasonsforopposingad comsponding requeststo consider changin@m5ropposition:
1 , Comprehensive Ennronmentai Testjng:
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughEnvironmentalJmpactAssessrnent (EIA) before the Project is approved.This amessmeritshouid evaluateall potential eriviroxmenta! effects, includinB air quaiity, noise poilution, andtraffic itnpacts. I believe that the project should not be qualified asexempt under CEQAO!ategorim Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects),Approval of the project may result in stgificarit effects relating to tic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not tive, Nwould }ike to receive the comprehensivereport that provesthe above untrue.

2. Transpareney oii Contamtnation ISsues: a
o Iseekaetailedreportsonpastcontmninationissuesassociatedwiththeprojemsite andhow thesewil! be addresed, 8peciflcaIly, I wou]d like to know whattests wili be conducted, which substariws are of concern, and how clean-up measws w'tl enme soil and groundwatersa%r.As the GeoTrackerdoes iiot mow r testing done after 8/I7/2021.

3. Ongojng Envjronmental Monitoring:
o l propose the establisent of a pian for otigoirig eavironmentaJ morfftoring throughout the construction and operational phases.This plan should oudine &w soil vapor monitoring wili be conductedpost-construcaonand tnc}udecontingency plans if vapor issues are dete;'ted during testing at tlie buiiding perit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulixerabJepopiaatiorts, and all community membersis of ost importance

4. Aeeou:ntability in Decision Ma!r.Nng:
o ] requestthe establishment of a mrnrnunity ad'visory board that inc]udes residents, en'vironmentaiexperts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspectsof the pro3ect,This will ensure acoountabiIity and provide resideritswith a voice in monitoring the project's impais.

5. Ade)la Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Raid) to remain in place:
o l stmngly urge the city to keep the K rail ciosed to ail traffic. Removing the K barrierwilI likeIy leadto increasedvehicleem'sstons, further degradingairquality.

Irequest a ciomprehensiveair qtmity assessmento understaixdthe potentiaJhealth impacts onresidents.Additiorrai[y, Nadvocatefor noise level testin@to evaluatethe effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing moxiitoring of air and rioise pollution levels if the barrier is removed, Engaging health ad environmerml experts to analyzethese impacts is essential
I tnistktyou will givethese concernsthe attention t?ieydeserve, Sidre Date:
c,,.,,, 1, ,, I S
tel 176
OPPOSITIONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJECT
I l() U 21 amopposingthelOl30AdellaProject(the
4'Pmject")Below, I have o y reasorisfor opposing andcorrespondingrequeststo consider chanBin@my oppositton:

1. Comprehensive Enviromnentai Testjng:
)f, Jrequestthatthedeve)operconductathoroughEnvironmenta]ImpactAssessnt (EIA) beforethe Project is approved.This assessmentshould evaltiate all potential environmemat efFects,including air quality, noise pollutioii, and traffic impacts, I believe that the project should riot be qualified asexerqt underCEQA Categorica} Bxemptioii under section U332 (Ciass 32-Deve!opmgrdaJPmjects), Approval of the project may re=sultin siziificant effects relating to tc, noise, air quality, or water quality, Nfthis is not true,I wouid kiketo receive the comprehensive report that pmves the above untiue,

2. Transparency on Contamination Issuesi a
P- IseekdetailedreportsonpasteontamJnationissuesassociatedwiththeprojectsite andhowthese wnl be addressed.Specificaily,Iwould Iike to know whattestswi}l be conducted, which subatarxcesare of concern, arid how clean-up measures w'll ensure miI and groundwater saf'ety,As the Geo Tracker does riot show furtlxer testing doneafar 8/17/2(\21.
3, Ongojng Envjronmental Monitoffng:
p l pmpose the establishment of a plait for ongoing environmentaJ monitoring throughout the constmction and operational phases,This plari should outline how soil yapor monitoring will be mnducted post<onstruction andiriclude comingency plans if yapor issues are detected during testin@at the buildirig permit stage.

Proteeting the heaith of eiJdren, vu]nerable populations, and all comtnunity ze@b@i is of utmost importance.

4. Aeeountabilityin Decision-MaldnBr
y, xrequesttheestablisbmentofacorunityad'visoryboardtbaiincludesresidents, erivfronmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the projw,t.This wil! ensure accourtabiiit5r and provide residents with n voice in rnonitoririg the projeot's impacts,

5. AdelhiAve.ConereteBarrier(KRai0toremaininplaee:

M I strongly urge the city to keep the K rai! closed to all taffic. Removing the K barrierwinlikely }eadtoincqased vehicleemissions,furtherdeBradinHairquality.

Irequest a comprehensive airquality assessmentto understandthe potermal health impactsonresidents,Additionally,1advocatefor noiseleveltestin@to evaluatethe effects of increased txoaffieflow and for oiyoing monitoring of air and noise poilution levels if the barrier is removed, Engaging health and environmental expertsto analyze theseimpacts is essential
ttum thatyou dl give theseconcerns the attention they deserve. aly<[aBDate:
177
OPPOSITION TO lOj30ADELLA PROJECT
Projecf') Below,I have outlined my reasonsfor opposingandcoritspondingrequeststo consider ehai'igiq my opposition:

1. Comprehegii'e Envjronmental Testing
o } requestthat the developer conduct a thorough Enviroxunental}mpu Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approved.This assessmentshould evaluate all poteritial environmenta} effec.ts,includin@air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. l believe thatthe project should not be qualified asexempt under CEQACategorical Exemption undm' on 15332 (Ciass 32-Developmenta} Projects). Approval of the project may resultin significanteffectsrelatir< to (raffic, noise, air quality, or ivater quaiity, IF this is not true, l would iike to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above utitrue,

2. Transparent on Contamtnatxon Istsues:a
o l seekdetailed tepoits on past contaminatiori issuesassociatedwith tm project site andhow thesewill be addressed.Specifically, I would }ike to la'iow wliat teatsmll be condu, whichsubstancesm of concern and how clean-up measureswall ensure soii and groundwater sieq. As the Geo Tracker does not show ftnther testin@doneafter 8/17,/021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o ! propose the establishmerit of a plan for ongoing enviromriental monitoting througbout the construction and operationakphases,This plan should outline how soil vapormonitoring will be conductedpost-constuction andinclude oontingercy plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the blinding permit stage, Protecting the health of chiidt'en, vuhxerable populations, arid all community members is of utniost importance
40 Arpnviqtnbfflty 2:aDainion Making:
o I requesttheestablishmentof a communityadvisor board thatincludes residents, environmetal experts, and city officiaIs to oversee the environmental aspects of the project, This will ensure accountability and provide residentswith a voice in monitoring the pmject's impacts.

5. Adella A'V& Concrete Barrier (K Rai]) to remain in place:
o I strongly utogethe city to keep the K rai) cloeed to aIl traffic. Removing the K bmrier will likeiy leadto inveasedvehicleemissions, futther degrading airquality, Ire:quest acomprehensive airquality assessmento understandtbe potential heam impacts on residents,Additiomlly, } advocatefor noise!evel testing to eva}uatethe effects of increased taffic flow and for ongoing moriitoying of air ad noise pollution ievels if the barrier is removed. Engagirig health aiid environmerital experts to analyze theseimpacts is essential,
l tftlSt
Signatuf Date:

S {:tG /2,r
178
uM'oSjTlO!N TO 10130ADELLAPROJECT
chaningmy opposition
L Comprehensive Environmental Test'ng
o IreqwstthmtbedeveloperconductathomughEnvironmentalImpactAssessrnent (EIA) before the Project is approved.This assessmentshotild evaluateal) potential environmentai effects,includinz air quaiity, noise pollution, and trafic impacts. I believethattheproject should not be qualified asexempt underCr,QACategorical Exemption under seetiori 15332 (Class 32-Developmenta) Projects), Approval of theprojectrimyresultin significanteffects relating to traffics noise, air quality, or water quality, Ifthis is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive report that provesthe above untrue

2. Transparency on ContamtnaUon Issueg:
o Lseekdetailedrepoxtsonpastcontarninationissuesassociatedwiththeprojectsite andhow these will be addressed.8pecifica!ly, I would liketo know whattests will becondumed,which substanvs are of concetz and how ales-up meawes will ensure soil and ground'water saf'ety.As the Geo Tracker does not diow further testing doneder 8/17/2021.

3. Ongojng .Envjronmental Monitoring:
o I propose the estabiishment of a plai for ongoing envitcinmental monitoring throughout the conmruction and operational phases,This plan shouid outl3nebow goi} vapor moriitoririg wiI! be conductedpost-consttionand includecontingency plans if vapor is8ues aiv deteded during testing at the building permit stage.

Protecting the health of children, vulnerable populations, and alj counity membersis ofutmost importance.

4. Aemuntability in Decision-Maklng:
o irequesttheestab!ishmentofacommuuityadvisoryboardthatinc}udesresidents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspectsof the proJect.Tis will ensure acwuntability and provide residents vvStha voice in monitoring the project's impacts,

5. AdeJlaAve.ConcreteBarrier(KRail)toremaininplaee:
o I stongky urge the city to keep the K rai} closed to all traffic, Ranovirig the K barrierwUliikeiyleadtoincreasedve!iicleemissions, furtherdegtadin@airquality.

I request a compre'hensiveair quality assessmentto understaridthe potential health impacts OTIresidents,AdditionallyJadvocate for noise level testing to evaluatethe effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise polJution}evelsif the bariieris removed,Engagin@healthandenvirormental experts to arialyze theseimpacts is essential.
khmthatyou will give thesecoacerns the attention they deserve.

Date:
(oO 179
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
sb-slz-s"
Date:
180
OPPOSITIONTO 10130 ADELLAPROJKCT
Project') Below, I have outiined niy teasonsfor opposing arid corresporiding tequests to consider chatying my opposition:

1. Comprehensive :€nviianmental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedevelopercondumathoroughBnvironmentalImpactAssessment (EIA) before ffie Project is approved. This assessmentshould evaluate all potential environmental effects, including air quality, noise polkution, and traffic impacts, I believe that Theproject should iiot be quaiified asexempt under CEQACutegorical Exe:mption kl!lder gection 15332 (C.lass32-Deveiopmental Projects), Approval of the ptoject may result in sigtiificant effects relating to tc, noise, air quality, or water quaiity, If this is not true, J would like to receive the comprehensive report that proves the above untue.

2. Tranapareney on Coxitamination Issues: '
o IseeMetailedtepottsonpastcontaminationissuesassociatedwtdifliepmjectsite and howthese will be addressed.Specificaiiy, I would like to know whattests wilt be condumed, which substancesare of concern, arid how ciean-up measures wilt ensure soil and grouridwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not mow flr test!ng done afkr 8/!7/2021.

3. OugoingEnvironmentalMonitortng:
o I propose the establishnxent of a plan for ongoing environmerffal rnonitoig throughout the consfl'uction and operationat phases, This plan shouid outline how soi!vapormoitoririgwill beconductedpod-constructionandincludecontingent plans Sf vapor issues are detected dut'ng testing at the butlding pertnit stage, Protectin@ the heaIthof children,vulnerablepopulatiom,and all comnunity membe.rsis of utmost importance.
4, Aciim4mglillity !n Decision-Makingt
o I request the establishment of a community advisory board tbat includes residents, environmental experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of ihe projgt, This will ensure accotintability aitd provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrler (K Rni)) to reniain in place:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K ran c!oseid to all traffic, Removtng the K barrierwill likeiy leadtoinmasedvehicieemissions,fu*er degxeidin@airqualtty.

Niquest a compihenmveairquality assesmnentto understand the potemal heatth impacts on residents. Additionally, 1 advocate for noise revel tegtingto evaluatethe eff'ects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing moriitoring of air arid noise pollution levels if the liarrier is removed,En@aging healthand environmental experts to analyze tbeseimpacts is essential.

Itrustthat you will give theseconcerns the attentiori they deserve, 1215s, {lrxmr
Signature
a.1.- :x.r -;>ci'b<
Date:
181
OPOSICI('N AL PROYECTO iOl30 ADELLA
yo"P'roy"ectF"')' %'3J) meopongoalProyectolOl30A
(ceolffespond11entesApmcoantciOnnuSaeldie6rna,rhceamexbpluuesmtolOmparaoponerme ylassolicitudes

1. Pruebas Ambientaleg Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que ei desarrollador reaiice una Evakuaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (ETA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad automat'zada, Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos }os posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo ta ca)idad del aire, la contaminaci6ri acustica y los iri'ipactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberfa calificar como exemo bajo la Exei'iei6n Categ6rica da ta CEQA, seg6n la secci6nl5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos deDesarrollo). Laaprobaci6n de4proyecto po&ia tener efectos significativos en el tAfico, ei riido, la aalidad del aire o ia calidad de! a@ua,De no serasf,me gustariarecibir el mforme completo que lo dernuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre I)roblemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detaliados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados qcoul61 perluSe'fbjoasdseel re"Jomec'o: ccu6am)eOs"seuastbaonrcdia"as'sonESpreeocl%oulSalsarmfded'idbaer de timpieza asegurari la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrffiea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestm pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021,

3. Mouitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo e} estabJecirniento de un plan para el moriitoreo ambiental corinuo durante las fases de coxistrucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de Jaconstrucci6n e incluir planes ddee copenmtinlgSOencdiea sciosnewdelltcecclt6ann pProrobtleegmea:ldaesvaalp,orddeurlanOstella vulnerables y todos los rniembros de }a comunidad es de mbima importancia.

4. ResponsabiJidad en Ia Toma de Decisiones:
o !Solicito el establecimiento de urx consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expeitos en rnedio ambiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar 108 aspectos ambientaleg del proyecto. Bsto garant'izarA la rendici6n da cucntas y brindarA a ios residentes una voz en el monitoreo de ios impactos del proyecto.

5. La lyarrera (K Rat}) de Adella Ave, permanecer* en su lugari o Urjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cetrado a todo t&co.

Levaiitar la barrera dei K probablcmente conducirA a un aurnento en las emisiones de vebfculos, degradando aun rubs la calidad- del aire, Solicito una e'valuaci6n integral de la caiidad del aire parn comprender los posibles impactos en la salud de los residentes, AdemAs, abogo porrea}izar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar los efectos del aumento en el fljo de trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si se }evai'ita la barrera. Es esencial involucrar a expeitos en sa)ud y medio mnbiente para analizar estos impactos, Confio en que darm a estas preocupacioi'ies }a aienci6n que merecen.

Fitnna tas/J/
182
oposici6s AL PRO\ECTO 10130 ADELLA
correspondientes paix considerg cambiar mi oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Ambientales Exltaustivas:
o Solieito que el desariollador realice sa Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (HIA) exliaustiva antes de que se implemente eualquier unidad automatiy,ada, Esta evaluaci6n debe evatuar todos log posibles efectos arnbientales, incluyendo la calidad dei aire, la contaxninaci6n acmica y los impactos en el txAfico, Creo que el proyecto no deberia caiifit;ar COTIIO exento bajo la Exenci6ii Categ6rica de la - CBQA,seg6nlasecci6n 25332(Clase32-ProyectosdeDesarrollo),Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podi{a teiier efegtos sigriificativos en el ttAfico, e] tuido, JacaJtdad del aita o la calidad det agua. De no ser asi, me gustaria recibiia ei informe compieto que 10 tletnuestre,

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Coiitam#naci6n:
o Bu.sco irtformes detallados sobre problemas de contaxninaci6n anteriores asociados con e[ sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn, Especificamente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebag se realizarii, curies sustaixcias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarAn la seguridad del suelo y det agua subterrAriea. Dado que el GeoTrackerno muestraliruebas adicionalesrealizadasdespu6s det 17/08/2021,

3. Monitoreo Ainbiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establocimiento de an plan para el rnonitoreo ambiental continuo durante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA et nionitoreo de vaporde sueio despu6s de Jaconstrucci6n e incluir plaiies decontingenciasisedetectari problemasdevaporduraiite14 pruebasenlaeiapa h pemnso da construcci6n, Proteger la salud de los nmos, las poblaciones vulnerabies y todos los mienibros de Ia comunidad es de xima impocia. 4* RespomsnliiUidad en ia Toma de Decisiones:
o So}icito el establecimiento de un corisejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambieitte y furicionarios de Xaciudad para supervisar 10Saspectos aznbienia}es det proyecto. Esto garamizarA la rendici<m de cuentas y brindarA a 108residentes una voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrcra (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permaneeer4 en Sit lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a la civdad a mante'ixer el K rail cerrado a todo trThco.

Levantar la barrera del K probableinente conducirA a un aurne:i'ito en lag emisiones de vehiculos, degradmdo ah mis la calidad del ire. 8olicito una eya}uai6n integral da la calidad dei aire para comprender los posibles impactos en Jasa}ud de 105rcsideiites.Ademb, abogoporreaiizar l':iruebasdenivelesde ruido lian evaluar los efectos dei auinento en el flujo de trAfico y por uii monitoreo continuo de.108 niveles de confarninaci6n del aire y del ruido si se le.vanta la barre:i;a. Es esenciaJ involucrar a expertos en salud y medio aianbtentepara analizar estos impactos, Conflo en que dar&i a estas preocupaciones la avnci6n quc merecen. (;AA":)gba.ia
Firma /
3 - p ,r- ;)-S '
Fecha
(u'( 183
OI'OSJCION AL PROYF,CTO 10130 ADF,LLA
(el "J"ro;ecto"). A cominuaci6n, he expuesto mis rizones para 6poiierme y rassoiicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. I)ruebas Ambientales Exhaustivns:
o Soiicito qrie cl desgrollador realice t'ina Evaluaci6n delmpacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se imp1enaiente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos }os posibles efectos ainbientales, incJi'iyendo la calidad del aire, ia contarninaci6n acustica y los impactos en el tafico. Crco que el proyecto no deberfa ca)ificar como exento bajo la Hxenci6n Categ6rica de Ia CEQA, seg(in la secci6nl5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrol}o), Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos significativos en el trffico, elruido, la calidad del atre o ta ca!idad del agua. l)e TIOser asi, me gustaria reciliir e! informe comp}eto que lo demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Containinaci6n:
o Busco inrormes detaklados sobre prob)ema.s de contaminaci6n axtteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordaran. Especificarnente, me gustarra saber qu6pruebasserealizar.m,cualessustanciassonI:ireocupantes y c6mo las medidas c'lelimpieza asegurarAn la seguiidad del sue]o y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracl<er no muestrapruebas adicionales rcaliidas despu6s <tel 17/08/202),

3. Monitoreo Ambiental C.ontinuo:
o Propongo cl establecii'niento de un plan para ei rnonitoreo aianbiental continuo dt'irante las fffises de conslrucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizaia;Ae] monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la cons[rucci6n e incluir planes de coixtingcncia si se detectaii probleinas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de Ios nir'ios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de x"iiAxima importaiicia.

4. Respo'iisabilidad en la Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de ut'i consejo asesor comruiitario que incluya a residentes, expe:itos ei'i medio ambiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizara la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarii a Jos residenles una voz en el monitoreo de los inipactos del proyecto. 5, La barrera (K Rail) de AdeJla Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidainente a la ciudad a inantencr cl K rail cerrado a todo trAfico, Levaiitar }a barrera del K probabNernente conducirA a un actmento ei'i las emisioncs de veliiculos, degradaitdo at'in mis la calidad del aire. Solicito ina evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del airc para coinprender 108 posibies impactcs en la salud de losresidenles.AdeinAs,abogol)01'realizarpruebasdeniveles deruido paraevalug los efectosdel aumentoen el flr4io dc trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de ios niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del rtiicto si se levanta ta Liarrera. ES esencial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio anibientc para analizar cstos iinpactos.

ConfNo en que dtir.:in a estas preocupaciones la a€enci6ri que merecen.

Fimia Fecha
184
OPO81CION AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
correspondientes para coxisiderar cambiat mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Anibientales 'Exhiiustivas:
o Solicito que el desarroilador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Atnbiental (EIA) exhaustiva anes de quc se implemente cua!qriier unidad automatizada. Esta eva)uaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efcctos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad deJ aire, la contamixiaci6n acustica y los in'ipactos en ei trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberfa calificar como exento ba,jo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de Ja CEQA, seganla secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 -Proyectos deDesarrollo). Laaproliaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el niido, ia calidad del aire o ia calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustaria recibir el inrorme completo que lo demuestre.

2. Transparencta sobre Prolilemts de Contatuinaei6n:
o Busco inforines detallados sobrc problemas de comarninaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyccto y c6mo se abordarii. Especificamei'ite, me gustaioia saber qu6 pruebas se rea}izarAii, cuAles sustancias soi'i preocupantes y c6mo Jas medidas de limpieza asegurarm la seguridad del suelo y del agua subterriea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no mucstra pruebas adicionales rea}izadas despu6s del k7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Anibiental Continuo:
o Propongo el estableciniiento de llll'l plaia para el monitoreo arnbiental continuo dutante las fases de cotxstrucci6n y, operaci6n. Estc p!an debe detallar c6mo se rea)iz.ara el monitorco de vapor de suelo despu6s de la constnicci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectaii problcmas dc vapor durante las prucbas en la etapa de permiso de cons'hcci6n. l)roteger ]a salud de ios niffos, tas poblaciones vulneral>les y todos 103 miembros de la comtnidact es de maxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Tonia de Decisiones:
o Solicito el estab]ecimiento de cin conse3o asesor comunitario que inchya a residentes, expcitos en rneciio zunbiente y fuiicionarios de la ciridad para supervisar los aspectos ainbientales de) proyecto. Esto garantizarA la reiidici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes ruia voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto,

5. La l>arrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en su lugar:
o Uijo encm:ecidaitiente a la ciudad a n'iaiiterier el K rai) cerrado a todo trAfico, Ievai'itar la bitrrera de) K probablemente conducirA a un atunento en las einisiones de vehfculos, degradando aun nips ta calidad del aire. Solici(o una evaiuaci6n integral da la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles impactos en la salud de los residentes AdemAs, abogo porreaiizar pruebas de ixiveles de ruido para e'valuar IOS efectos del aumento en e! f]ujo de trfco y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de containiiaiaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta Ja bairera. Es esencial invotucrar a expertos en salucl y medio ambiente para analizar estos in'tpactos, Confio cn que dtiri'tn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6n que merecen.

Firma Pecha
(0(z 185
I aYOOa"o\Ill0oNOl4:o :JO'l3oA" :'n'i'o'pApols'i.i'i0gJth'eCllOl3 AclelJaProject(the
changing my opposition:

1. Compreliensive Environmental "l'esting:
o I requcst that tlie developer conduct a tliorougli Ei'ivironmental Impact Assessment (mA) before the Project is approyed. 'I'his assessment sliould evalriate all potential environmentaleffects,includin@ air quality, noise poilutio.i'i, andtraffic impacts. I beiieve that the project sliould not be qualified as exempt under C'EQA Categorical Exe:t'nption uiaxdcr sectioyi U332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of theprojectmayresultii'i significanteffectsrclatiii@ to traffic, noise,air quatity,or water quality. If this is not true, T would iike to receive tl'ie compi'eliensive report that proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contaniination Issues:
o I seek detailed repoits all past contamination issttes associate<'l wiLli tlie project site tuid how these wili be addressed. Specifically, I would like to kllOW what tests wilt be conductect, which substai'ices are of concern, and liow ctean-up measures wilt ensure soil and groundwater safet)i. As the Geo Tracker does i'iot show furtlier testing done after 8/17/202J.
3, Ongoing Environmental !Vlonitorixig:
o I propose the establishment of a pJan for ongoing environinentat monitoring tl'uaoughout the construction and operational phases. This plan sh<iuld outline how soil vapor monitoring wilJ be conducted post-construction aiid incmde corttingency plans if vapor issues are detected dtning testing at tlie buildiiig peimit stage.

Protecting the healtb or cl'iildren, vulnerable populations, aim a(l community metnbers is o('utmost importance.

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o I request the establishmetil of a cotnmunity adyisory board t)iat includes residents, enviroru'neiital experts, and city officia]s to oversee the enviroiitnenta) aspects of tlie project. Tliis will ensure accouitability and provide residents with a voice in monitoriiig tbe project's impacts.

5. Adella Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remaixi in peace:
o J strongly urget}ie city to keepthe K rail closedto all trafJ'ic.Removixi@theK barrierwikllikely leadto increasectveltic)e emissions, fi.irtl'ier c!e@rading air quality. l request a compreliensiye air quality asscssn'ient to understand tiaie potential liealth impacts on residents. Additionally, I advocate for noise level iestiiig to evaluate the effec(:s of increased traffic flow and for ongoing morritoring of' air aixd noise pollution levels if tlie barrier is removed. Engnging lieal!:h and environmentak experts to aiiaJyze these impacts is essential,
tliese coiicems tlte attention (:hey deserve.

Date:
/l 186
OPOSIC-JON AL PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto"), A-cofflixiui6n, He expucsto mis rdones paioaopon-erme y las solicitudes cotrespondientes para comiderar cai'nbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desa'toilador realice tma Evaluaci6n de Jmpacto Ambientat (EIA) exhaustiya antes de que se implcipente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debc evaluar todos los positiles efectos ambientales, tncluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y los impactos en el trAf-ico. Creo que el proyecto CEQA,
110 deberJa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la segun lasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32 -Proyectos deDesarrollo). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podria tener efectos significativos en el trMco, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua De no ser asi, me gustaxia recibir el informe corripleto que to demuestre.

2. Transparencia solire Problemas de Contamii'iaci6n:
o
con
Busco
el sitio
informes detalladossobreliroblernasde contariiinaci6n antcriores asociados del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especfficamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizaiaAn, curies sustaiicia.q son preocupanles y c6mo las n"iedidas Geo
da limpieza
Tracker
asegurarania.seguridaddel sueloy del aBua subterrmea. Dado que el no n'iuestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s de} ] 7/08/2021,

3. Monttoreo Arnbiental Continuo:
c 'Propongo el establecimiento de un p)ari pata el monitoreo ambicntaJ conlinuo durante tas fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan delie detallar c6mo se realizarA el rnonitoreo <le vaporde suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e inc)uir planes de contingencia si se detectan proMemas de vapor durante }as piauebas en la etapa tte permiso de constit'icci6n, Protcger la salud de 108 xiifios, las poblaciones yulnerables y todos 103 miembros de )a coniunidad es de maxima impottancia. 4, Responsnbilidad en la Torna de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento cte un coi'isejo aSeSCr cori'iunitaiio que incluya a residentes, expextos en medio ambicnte y funcionarios de la ciudad para supcrvisar 108 briiidara
aspectos annbientales <tei proyecto. Esto gararitizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y a IOS rcsidentes una voz en el monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La tmrrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave, perx'atnnecerA en su Itigar:
o Uyjo encarecidamentc a la ciudad a manteng el K rail cerrado a todo tr4fico. Levaiitar la batarera <le) T" probablen"ientc conducirA a uxi aumento en las emisioncs de vel'itculos, degradando aun mis la calidad del aire. So!icito una evaluaci6n integrai de la calidad del aire para comprender 108 posibles impactos en la saiud de los residentes. Adem6s, abogo pr>r realizar pruebas da nive)es de ruido para evahiar los efectos del aumento en ej flujo de trt4fico y por tui monitoreo continuo tie lo8 niveles de contarninaci6n dct aire y del ruiilo si se levanta la liarrera. BS esex'tcial involucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambtenle para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en que darAri a estas prcocupacioxies la atenci6n que merecen. 711ulmQy-'J@}U-4't,'(iip3t-hl,cWlgq(vbg-.>
'3t,,%187
OI)OSICION AL l)ROYECTO 10130 -ADEi,LA
correspondientes para considerar canibiar rni oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exl'iausttvas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador rcalice una Evaluaci6n de Tmpacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se iniplernente cualquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaJuaci6n debe evaluar todos 108 posibles efectos arnbientales, inchiyendo la caJidad del aire, la coi'itaminaci6n acustica y los impactos en el trA:fSco. Creo que el proyecto no deberracalificar como exeiito bajo (a Excnci6n Caieg6rica de la CHQA, seg(in lasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tetier efectos significativos en el Mfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o ia calidad del agua. De no ser ast, me gustarfa recibir el informe completo q'ue lo demuestre.

2. Traxisparencia sobre Probiemas de Cotxtamtnaei6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobrc proble'inas de contaminaci6t'x antcriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6n'to se abordarAn. Especfficamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, cuAles sustancias 8011 preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarAn ta seguridad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que cl Geo Tracker no muestrapruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s deil7/08/2021. 3, Monitoreo Ambicntal Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimieiito de un plan para e( monitoreo an'tbiental continuo reaJizarA
durante las
el monitoreo
fasesde constracci6ny operaci6ia.Este lilan debc tletallar C('ffiO se de yapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir piar>es de contingencia si se ttetectmi proLilemas de vapor durante las pruebas an la etapa de pern'iiso de construcct6n. .}'roteger la sa!utt de los nifios, las poblaciories vulnerablesy todos IOSmien'ibrosde!a comunidadesdamAxin'ibiimliortancia.

4. ResponsiibiIidad eti la Toma da I)ecisiones:
o Solicito at estabiccimiento de un conse,ioasesor comunitario que inchiya a los
residentes,
aspcctos
expertosen medioanibientey funcionariosdela ciudadparasuliervisaio amliientafes del proyecto. Esto gayantizara la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a 108 residentes una sroz en el i'nonitoreo de 108 itnpactos del proyecto. 5, La barrera (K Rail) de Adeila Ave, permanecerA en sit lugar:
0 Uijo encarecidamente a 121ci'udad a mantcner el K rail cerrado a todo t/tfico. L,evantar la liarrera del K probablcmexite conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehfculos, degradando m'm mis la calidad del aire. Solici[o una evaluaci6n integral cle la calidad del aire para coniprender los posibles impactos en la salud de losresidentes. AdemAs, abogo por realizarpiuebas de niizeles dc ruido para evaluar los efectos del aumento en e) flujo de tThco y por un moni[oreo coritinuo de los niyeles de contarniiiaci6r> del aire y del rt'iido si se lcyaxita la barrera. Es esenciat in'volucrar a expeitos en salud y .i"iiedio amlriente para analiz.ar estos in'ipactos, Confio en que darAn a estas preoc'ipaciones la atenci6n qxie n'ierecen.

Fecl'ta
188
OPO8ICION AL l)ROYECTO lOi30 ADELLA
(el (Py6ye5to").' A c6ntim'taeMn, lie expuesto iiiffi razones para 6poffierrne y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar catribiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhauslivas:
0 Solicito que el desanollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambicntal (HIA) exliaustiva antes de que se implemente cuaiquier inidad automatizada, Esta evaluaci(in debe evalriar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y 108 impactos en el trAfico, Creo que el proyecto no deberla caliiicar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segtui la secci6n 15332 (Ciase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). La aprobaci6n de) proyecto podria tener efectos significatisios en e) t'fico, el ruido, la calidad del airc o la calidad del agua, De no ser iisf, me gustarfa recibir el informe completo que lo demuestre,

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contamimtei6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordari. Especfficamente, me gustarta saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, cuales susl-ancias son preocupantes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarii la seguridad del sueto y del agua subterranea. Dado qcie el Geo Tracker no n'iuestra pruebas adicionales rea}izadas despues del ! 7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el estab}ecimiento (l(' ru'i plan para (;'l monitoreo ainbiental contiiiuo durai'ite }as fases de construcci6n y operaci6n, Este plan debe detaltar c6mo se rcalizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e iricluir plai'ics de contingencia si se detectaii problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de periniso cle construcci6i'i. Proteger ia salud de Jog nirios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos 108 miembros de la comunidad es de maxima mrportancia. 4, Responsabilidad eri la Toma de l)ecigiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor coi'dunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio ambientc y rrmcioxiarios dc la ciudadpara supervisar los aspectos ainbientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6rt de cuentas y brindarA a 105 residentes una voz en el monitoreo de loS impaetos dei proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rai)) de Adellxt Ave. permanecer6 en sti lugar:
o U.ijo encarecidamcrrle a ta ciudad a manteiier cl K rail cerrado a (odo trAfico. de
Levantarla barreradel K I:>robablementeconducirAexun aumentoenlas e'inisiones vel:ifcu)os, degradaiido aan rubs la ca)idad del airs. Solicito unu evaii'iaci6n integr*i) de la caliaad del aire para con'iprender los posibles impactos en Ia sa!ud de los residentes. Adem6s, abogo por realizar pi'uebas de r'iiveles de ruido para evatuar los efectos del aumento eii el fhtjo de trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de )os niveles de contamiriaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera. IE,!3esencial involucrar a expertos en sa!uday medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en que daran a estas preocupacioncs la atenci6'ii quc merecen.

Firifia Fecli
\'lO 189
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADEI,LAPROJECT
Project")Below,I ltaveoutlinedmyreasonsfor opposingandcorrespondin@ requeststo consider clianging niy opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmentiil Testing:
0 Erequest that the developer conduct a thorough Environmei'ital Impact Assessment (EIA) before the Project is approyed. This assessment shorild evakuate atl potential envirotunentaJeffects,incluctingair quality, noise pollution> and traffic in'ipacts. I believe that tlie project shot'ild not be quakified as exempt under CEQA CategoricaJ Exemption xinder sectiori 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approva) of the project may result in signi:ficaiit effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If tl'iis is not true, I would Jike to receive the compreliensive repoit tl'iat proves the above untrue.

2. Transpm'ency on Contamination issues:
ci l seekdetailedreportsonpastconiaininationissuesassociatedwith tl'iepn;iectsite aiid how these wig) be addressetL Specifically, I wouJd like to know what tests will be cort<tucted, which sulistances are of concem, and liow cleai'i-up measutes will ensure soif and groundwater safety, As the Geo Tracker does not show ftmher testing done after 8/17/2021,

3. Ongoiiig Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establishmen( of a plait for ongoing en'vironinental monitoring throughotrt tlte constuction aixd operationa} phases. Tliis p)aii sliould outline how soil vapormonitoiing will lie conducted post-coiistruction and iiiclude contingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at tl'ie l'>uilding permit stHgq, Protecting the l'iea.ltli of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance.

4. Accountnbility in Decision-Making:
o I request the establisl'iment of a community advisory board that inc)udes residents, eirvironmenLal experts, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. Tbis will ensure accountability and provide resideiaits with a voice in monitoring tl':ie project's impacts.

5. Adella Aye, Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in p]see:
o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all taffic, Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased vehicle en'iissions, furl}ier degrading air quality. f requcs( a comprehensive air quality assessment to rinderstand the potential liea)tli impacts on residents. Addi(ionally, I advocate for noise level testing to evakuate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoi"ing of air aiid noise poil'i'ilionlevels i:['the barrier is removed.HngaginB health <ind environmenta) experts to aiialyzc these iinpacts is essential,
f trust that you will give these attention they deserve, 4!,-7")-tir;E"
190
OPOSICION AL PROYli;C'I'0 10130 ADELLA
correspondieiites para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambicntales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarroflador realice nun Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (HIA) exhaustiva axites cie que se implemente cualqrtier unidad automatizada, IEsta evalciaci6n debe evalciar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo IEL calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n actistica y los impactos en cl trAfico, Creo que el proyecto no deberia calificar como exento bajo la Hxenci6ti Categ6ricu de la CEQA, segi la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo), Laaprobaci6n de} proyecto podriatener efecLos significativos an el trA'fico, 01ruido, la calidad del aire o la ca)idad del agua, De no ser ast, me gustarrarecibir el informs compteto que lo den'iuestre2, Triinsparencia so)yre Problemas de (:'ontaminaci6n:
o Busco 'infonnes detailados sobre problen'ias de contaminaci6n aiiteriores asociados con el sitio de} proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especfflcarnente, me gustar!a saber qu6 pruebas se realizarii. angles sustaiicias son preocupantes y c6mo las tnedidas de l'impieza asegtirarAn la seguridad del sue}o y dei agua subterr6nea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no iauestra pruebas adiciona}es realizadas despu6s det l 7/08/2021. 3, Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Proliongo el establecimierito de un plan para el moriitorco ambiental continuo duraiite las fases cle construcci6n y olieraci6n. Estc pJax'idebe detallar c6n'io se rcalizar6 el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n c incluirplaites de contingencia si sc <letectan problemas de vapor durante Ias pruebas en la e(apa de permiso de construcci6n. Prote@er )a salud dc 108 nirios, )as poblaciones vulner=ibies y todos tos miembros de la comunidtid es de miima inrportancia.

4. ResponsabiIidad en la Tomn de Decisiones:
o Solicito ei establecin'iiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que inctuva a residcntes, expertos en mcdio ambiente y fhtncionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos aiubientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rent(ici6n de cuentas y brindar6 a Jos residentes una voz en el n':ionitoreo cie 108 impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en su luga#:
o Urjo encarecidamente a )a ciudad a maiitener et K rail ceirado a (odo trMco.

Levantai' la barrcra del K probablcmente conducira a un aumento en IEISemisiones de veliiculos, degradando ann n'iAs )a calidad del aire. SoJicito una evaluaci6n integral de la caiidad del aire liai'a comprenderlos posibles in'ipaclos en la salud de los residentcs.AdemAs,abogolior realizar pruebasde nivcles de ruido paraevaluar los efectos del aumento cn el flujo de trAfico y por un monitorco continuo de 103 niveles de contaminaci6n del earc y del ruido si se levanla la bairera. Es escncial invotucrar v expertos en salud y medio ambicnte para aitalizar estos irnpactos, Confio en que daran a estas preocupaciones la a'[enci6n qi.ie n'icrecen, Fl,llla t,,3-zA,e,t Cjt!ff eA Fech"a - 24
'lr 191
OPPOSIIION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
Project")Below,I have outlined my reaso:nsfor opposingaitdcorresl:iondingrequeststo consider cliarxgin@my oppositiori:

1. Comprehensive Enviromnental Testing:
o I reqriest tl'iat thedeveloper conduct a thorough Environmental impact Assessment (EJA) before the Project is appro'ved. This assessment shor'dd evaluate al) potential environmentaJ effects, including air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I believe tliat tl'te project sliould not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (C).ass 32-Developn'iental Projects). Approval of the pro.iccl may result ixi significant effects relatingto taffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. if' this is not true,T woild like to receiye the compxehensiye report that proves the above untrt.'ie.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek detailed reports on past contamination ISSUESassociated with the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically,'iwould likc to know wbat tests will be conducted, wl'iicli substances are of concern, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and gmundwater safety. As tlie Geo Tracker does not sliow furtl'>er testing done after 8/1 7/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I propose the establislimcnt of a plan for ongoing environmentat monitoring tliroughout the construction and operational phases, This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and include contixigency plm'is if vapor issues are detected duiing testi'iig at the buitding permit stage, Protecting the health of cliildren, vu!nerable populations, and all community n'ien.ibers is of utmost importance.
4, Accountability in Decision-Maldng:
c l request the establisl'unent of a comnninity advisory board that includes residents, enviroi'irnental experts, and city officials to oversec tl>e enyiromriental aspects of fhe project. 'Iltis will ensare accountability atxd provide residents with a yoice in moriitoring thepro.iect"simpacts.
5, Ade)la Ave. Concrete Barrier (K flail) to remaixi in placer o I strongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to all traffic, Removing the K barrier wikl lilcely lead to increased vehicle emissions, furtlter degrading air quali-ty.

Irequest a comprehensive air quality assessment to uridc!stand the potential heakth impacts on residents. Additionally, l adyocate for noise ]evel testing to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and rixiise pollutiori levels if the barrier is removed, E:ngaging }iealfli and en'vironmental Itrust that u
to analyze tl>ese impacts is essential.

Biv t]ieseco e attentioix they deserve.

C)3A1A,(
Date:
\'l'37 192
OPOSJCION AL PROYECTO lOt30 ADELLA
(el
Yo
"Proyaecto"),
!,4V
A corjtinuaci6xi,'
tne opongoal ProyectotOl30 Ade)la he expt'iesto tnis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para consideraia cambiaia mi oposici6n:

1. l'ruebas Amlyientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de impacto Ambiental (BIA) exliaustiva aiites de que se implemente cualquier unidad automatizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe e'valuar todos los posibles efectos am'bientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la coi'itai'iiinaci6n acristicay los impactos en el trAfico, Creo que e,l proyecto rio deberfa cali:llcar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, seg<in lasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrol[o). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la ca!idad del agpa. De no ser ash, me gustarta recibir el informe completo que lo rlemuestre.

2. Transparenexa sobre Problemas de Contaminacik
o Busco informes detallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6n anteriores asocia<los con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se aboidar&n. Especfficainen'te, me gustarfa saber de
qu6
limpieza
pruebasserealizar;ui,cubes sustanciassonpreoculiantesy c6mo las medidas asegurarAn la seg'uridad del suelo y de) agua subterranea. Geo I)ado que el Tracker iio muesta pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del l 7/08/2021,

3. Moxiitoreo Ambientai Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para el rri-oniloreo ai'itbientaJ continuo durarite las fases de constracci6n y opcraci6ti. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de yapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir platxes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor durai'ite las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de los nifios, ]as poblaciones 'vulneraMes y todos kos mieml':>ros ae la comunidad cs de tnAxima importancia. 4, Responsabilidad en la '['oma da Decisiones:
o Solicito el estab)ecin'iiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que inclu)ia a residentes, expertos en medio ambiente y fu'i"icionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales de) proyecto. Esto garaiitizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes una yoz en et monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto,

5. La !iarrera (K Raid) de Adella Ave. permnnecer:t en su Iugar:
o Urjo encarecictamentc a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado :a todo trAfico. Levantar la barrera del K probablemente conducirA a rm auinento an las emisiones de veliiculos, degradaiido at"in mis )a caJidad del airc. Solicito una evaluaci6n ilnOtsclgerSal1ddenetlea:Aaliddealndl5!ela, sbiiOrge0pparOarcreoan)il.p7.r,e5ipdl7urelboasspd niveles
loSefectos
tte contarninaci6ri
de)aciinentoen el flujo de trafico >rpor llll moriitoreo continuo de ios del aire y del ruido si se levanta la barrera. Bs esencial involucrar a expertos en salucl y n"iedio ambiente para aitakizar estos impactos.

C.on.tto en quei datAn a estas preocupaciones la atenci6'i'i q'c'iexnerecen.

Firma
Feclia
t'l'( 193
01)OS?CION AL PROYECTO 20130 ADELLA
correspondientes
(el "Proyecto"), A continuaci6n, he expu@sto n'iis razones pam oponerme y las solicitudes para considerar cainbiar mi oposici6n:
i. Prtiebas Amliientalcs Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarroltador realice rina Evaluaci6n da Iinpacto Ambiental exhaustiya (EIA) e'valuaci6n
antes de que se implemente cualquicr unidad automatizada, Esta debe evaluar [odos ios posibles cfectos ambienta!les, calidad del incluyendo la proyecto
aire, la contaminaci6n acjistica y los impactos en el trAfuco. Creo que et CBQA, segtu'ila
i"io deberfa calificar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de ia secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de T)esarrollo). La aprobaci6n aire
del proyecto
o
podr{a tener efectos significatiyos en el trAfico, el ruido, }a calidad del que lo
lht calidad del agua. De no ser aat, me gustaria recibir eL informe completo demuestre,

2. 'I'ransparencia sobre Problemas de Contam*naci6n:
o Busco infotmes detaltados sobre problemas de contanffnaci6m anteriores asociados con qu6 piuebas
el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordar{in. Especfficamente, me gustarfa saber de
se realizarAn, cuffiles sustaytcias son greocupantes y c6mo las medidas Geo
lirnpieza
Tracker
aseguraiiAn la seguridad de] suelo y del agua subterrAi'iea, Dado que el no rmiestiaa pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/OS/2021,

3. Monitoreo ,kmbiexi(:al Continuo:
o
durante
Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para el inonitoreo ai'nbiental continuo realizart
[as fitses de conslrucci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se de contingencia
el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de Ia construcci6ri e incluir planes de permiso
si se detectan problemas de 'vapor durante las pruebas an la etapa de coristrucci6n. Proteger la salud de los hiffos, ias poblaciories vulnerables y todos los n'itcmbros de la comunidad es <le maxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad exi la Toina de l)ecisiones:
o
residentes,
Solicito el estabiecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario quc incluya a expertos en medio ambiente y fiuicionarios de la ciudad para supervisar bri:ndax-A
los aspectos ail>iey'itales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y a los residentes una voz en el monitoreo de k>3 impactos del proyecto.

5. Ln barrera (K Rail) de Adella Aye. pcrmiinecer4 en su lugar:
o Utjo encarecidamentc a la ciudad a n"xayitener ea K ran cerrado a todo trAfico. I,evantar Ia barrera del K probab)emeitte conducitA a un aumento en las emisiones de integral
velifculos, degradando akin mis la calidad del a:xre. Solicito una eva}uaci6n de la calidad 6et aire para comprender tos residentes. los posibles impactos en la salutl de Ademb, abogo porrealizar prucbas de niyeles de ntido para e'valuar niveles
los efcctos del arimento en ei flujo de trMco y por un monitoreo continuo de los de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levai"ita la lyarrera. Es csenc'ial invol'ucrata a expertos ca salud y medio amtiiente para analizar estos impactos.

CoJo en que preocupaciones la atenci6n que n"ierecen.

Firma
t'l5 194
OPPpSiT iON TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
J7A l )'lJe t.,,,a amopposingthe ]0130AdellaPrqject(the ec!") Below, I ha .lined my reasons for opposing and corresponding reqbieststo consider my oppositron:

1. Comprehensive Enviroximental Testing:
o I request that the developer conduct a thorougli Environmental Jmpact Assessment (EIA) before the Pro,ject is approved. Tl'iis assessment sbould evaluate all poteiitial environmental effects, ineluding air quality, noise pollution, and traffic impacts. I be]ie've that the project sliould not be qualified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemption under section 15332 (Ciass 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of tl'ie project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. if tiffs is not lrue, I would l;ke to receive the comprehensiye report that proves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamimttion issues:
o I seekdetailedreportsOl'lpastcontan"iinationissues associatedwith the prqicct site and how these wil} be addressed. Specifical]y, I would iikc to know wliat tests will be conducted, wliicli substmices are of concern, aiid how c:iean-up measures wi]l ensure soil arid groundwater safety. As the Cieo Tracker does not show further testing done aJ'ter 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o l propose the establishrnem of a plan for ongoing envirorimenta) monitoring throtgl'iotxt d'ie construction and operational pliases. This piaii shoukl outline how soiJ vapor monitoiit'ig will be conducted post-construction and include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected duriiig testing bit the buildiitg permit stage.

Protecting t!ie l'xcalth of chil6ren, vulnerabie populations, and atl community members is of utmost importaiice.

4. Accountability in Decision-Makirig:
o I request the establisi'unent of a communi(y advisory board that includes residents, environmental experts, aad city officials to oversee the environmenta) aspects of the project. This will ensure accountability aitd proyide residents with a voice in monitoring the Ixoject's impacts.

5. Adejla Ave, Concrete Barrier (K Raid) to remain in piace:
o I strongly urge the city to keep tlte K rail closed to ali traffic. Removitig tl'ie K bariier will Jikely iead to increased vehicle cmissiots, further degrading air quality.

I request a coit'>preltensive air qualii.y assessmcnt to uriderstand the potential healtli impactson residents.Additionally,Iadvocate for noise level testiiiB to evaiuate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise pollutiori levels if tl'ie baiirier is removed. Engaging liealth and enyiroi'xmental experts to analyze these impacts is esseiitial.

L trust that yori will give these concerns tlie atterition t)'iey deserve. 0,7 15/ 2('23;
Date:
tl(-( 195
OPOSICION Ai, PROYECTO 1013J) ADELLA
(el "Proy-ecto"), A continuaci6n, he e-xpffe'sto inis razones para oponerie y las soiicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador reatiee una Evaluaci6r'i de Ii'npacto Ambienta} (EJA) cxhausti'va antes ryeq'ue se impietnente cualquier onidad automatizada. Esta evakuaci6n debe evaluar todos los posib)es efectos ambientales, incluyendo fa calidad del aire, la contan'iinaci6n actxstica y los iinpactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyecto no deberfa calificar como exen[o bt'ijo la 'Hxenci6n Cat.eg6rica de la CEQA, segi la secci6rn5332 (Clasc 32 - Proyectos da Desarrollo). La aprobaci6ri del proyectopodria tcnerefectossi@nificativos enel trAfico,el ruido, la calidad del aire o la ca}idad del agua, De no ser asl me gustarta recibir el informe cornpleto que lo denuiestre.

2. Transparencia sobre Problemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco infortnes detallados sobre problemas de containinaci6n anteriores asociados qu6
conei sitio del proyectoy c6moscabordarAn.Bspecfficamente,n"ie @ustarra saber pruebas se realizarAn, cuffiles sustancias son preocupantes y 061110las ianedidas de Iimpieza aseguraran la seguridad del suelo y del agua subtcrrAnea, Dado que cl Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas dcspu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Coxitiniio:
o
durante
Proliongo el establecimientede un plan para cl monitoreo ax'nbientalcontinuo laS fascs de construcci6n y riperaci6n. IE,ste plaii debe detallar c6mo se realizara el monitoreo de vapor t:te suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir planes de
decontingencia
permiso
si sedetectmiproblcmasde'vapordurantelas liruebas en la etapa dei congtrucci6n. i)roteger la salud de los ninos, )as poblaciones vulnerablcs y todos los miembros de la corminidad es de mAxirna importancia. 4, Responsabilidad en la l'oma *le l)ecisiones:
o
residentes,
Solicito el estableciniiento de un conse,ioascsor comunitario que incluya a expertos en medio aiiibiente y funcionarii.'is de ta ctudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA tk los residentes yu'ia voz en e! monitoreo de Jos impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA an su lugar:
o Urjo encarccideimente a la ciudad a maiitener el K rail cerrado a iodo trAfico. T.,evantar la barrera dcl K probablemeiite conducirA a un ttumento en las emisiones dc yehtculos, degradaiqdo aun rubs 1ia calidad del aire. Solicito una cvaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para cornprcnder los posibles ii'npactos en la salud da )os residentes. Adem.4s, abogo por realizar p'iuebas de niveles da ipido paiaa evaluaia 108 efectos del aurnerito en el flujo de trAfico y- por un moni[oreo continuo de 109 niveles dc contaminaci6n del aire y det ruido si se tevttnta la barrera. Us esencia} involucrar a expcrtosensal'i.tdy n"iedioambicnteparaanalizarestosiml'iactos. 0,3.., zy .202,S
\'l'1 196
01)OSiCI(')N AL PROYEC'l'0 10130 ADELLA
Yo /(.",,.54.q, E-l,,,' meopongoalProyectolOl30.!idella (e! '!%'yecto"). A conti'!;c\!i, he expttesto mis razones paioa oponerme y las solicitudes coirespondientcs para considerar carnbiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
0 Solicito que el desarrollacior rea}ice 'iuia Hvaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhausti'va antes de que se impleimente cua}quier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe e'val'ug todos los posibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del uire, ta contamiriaci6n acr'istica y los impactos en e] trAfico. Creo quc el proyecto no deberfa cali.[icar como exento bajo la Exenci6n Categ6rica de Ja CEQA, segun la secci6n I 5332 (Clasei 32 - 'Proyectos de Desarro}lo). I,a aprobaci6n del )iroyecto podr!a tener efectos significativos en el trafico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la catidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustaria recibir el inforine completo que lo <ternuestre.

2. Transpat'encia sobre Problemns de Contaminaci{m:
o I3usco informes detallados sobre problei'nas de contaminaci6n anteriores asociados con cl sitio del proyecto y c6mo sc abordaitn. Especificaxnente, me gustarfa saber qu6 pruebas se xealizar!an, ct'iAles sustancias son preocupantes y C('mO las n"iedidas de limpieza aseguraran la seguridad del sixelo y del agua suLiterrhnea, Dado que el Geo "I'racker no muestrapruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s dcl 17/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiexital Contihuo:
o I'ropoxigo el establecimiento dt' um plan para el mouitoreo ambiental continuo durantc tas fases de constri'icci6n y operaci6n. Estc plari debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despues de la construcci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si sti detectan pi:'oblemas dc vapor durante las pruebas en la etffipa de, periniso de construcci6n. Protegcr ka salud de los xiirios, las poblaciones vulnerables>rtodoslos miembrosdela comtinidadesde rnAximaimportancia.

4. Responsabilidad an !la Toma de Deeisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio anibiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar 103 aspectos ambientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas )i brindarA a 108 residentes una voz en el n':ionitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

S. Ln barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecer:' en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidamente a la ciudad a mantener eI K rai} cerrado a todo trAfico, Le'vantar la barrera del K probablemente conducira a un aumento en )as emisiones de vehicalos, degradando akin mis la calidad dei aire. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire par;i comprender 108 posilyles impactos en la satud <Ie los residentes. Adernas, abogo por rea}izar pruebas de niveles de niido para evaluar los c:fectos de) at.tn':icnto en el flujo de tri':fico y por yii'i monitoreo continuo de 10S niyeles de contaminaci6n dcl aire y dei ruido si se Jevanta Ia barrera. Es esenciai involucrar a expertos en salud y medio an.ibiente para aixalizar estos impactos.

Coxfflo en qric darAn a estas preocupaciones la ate.itci6n qtre lneJ'eCen.

Fl1rln,(11Y>)'C"',;')e):A,5i(3,, '-'Q')Prxr;f, )
-:< - ! 'Y'- '-:t 5-
Fecha
\'l'b 197
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA l)ROJECI'
xl/'a"'47)kv;" amopposingtlielO}30AcieliaI-'roject(llie "Project") Below, r have outtincd my reasons for opposixig and corresponding requests to consider charrging my opposition:

1. Compreliensive Enviroiiniental Testing:
o I request that the developer coxiduct a tl'iorough Enviroi'imental In'ipact Assessn'ient (EJA) before the Project is approyed. This assessmen( sl'iouJd evaluate a)I potential environmentaleffects,indudinB air quality, noisepollution, aiid traffic impacts. } believe tliat the project shoyild not be qrialified as exempt under CEQA Categorical Exemptioxi under section 15332 (Ciass 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of tlie projec may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air qua]ity, or water quaiity. ff this is t'>ottrue, J would like to receive the con'ipreliensive t'eport tliat proves the above untrue.

2. '[!oansparency on Contaminntton Issues:
o Tseek detailed repoits on past contaminatiori issues associated witli the prqiect site and llO'l;V lJiese win be addressed. Specifically, I wou!d iike to knowi wliat tests will be condricted, which substances arc of concern, and 110Wclean-up measures wit) ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracker does t'iot show furtlier testing dosie after 8/17/202].

3. Ongoing EnviroiunentaJ Monitorbig:
o I propose the estabiisliment of a plan for ongoing erivironn'icntaJ monitoring throughout the construction and operational pliases, 'rhis plan should outline how soil vapor moriitoiing wiil bc conducted post-construction and include coiitingency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at tlie building permit stage.

I)rotecting the health of chiidren, mJnerabie popuiations, and all communitymembers is of xitmost importaxice.

4. Accountability !i Decision-Making:
c I request tlie establishment of a commui'iity advisoi'y board tliat iiicludes residents, environmer'itat experts, and city officia)s to oversee the environmental a8peCtS of' the project. Tl-iis will ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring the project's impacts.

5. Adejhi Aye. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain in place:
o I strongly urge the city (o keep the K rail closed to all traffic. Removing the K barrier will likely lead to increased veliicle emissions, further degrading air quality. l request a comprehextsi>reair qriality assessment to understand tlie potentiaJ health impacts on residen'ts, Additionally, I advocate 'J'ornoise leve} testit'ig to evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and 'for oixgoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the lyarrier is removed. Engaging health and en'vironincntal experts to anxilyze tliese impacts is essential.

Itrust tl'iat you will give t)icse concerns tire attention they deserve. s.€xiatu LW %,eA- a%":iax"'
Date"
l'lOl 198
OPPOSITION TO 10130 ADELLA PROJECT
cbanging m)i opposition:

1. Comprehensive Comnrehensive Environmental Testimngi
o IrequestthatthedeveloperconductathoroughHnyirox'tmentallmpactAsscssment (EIA) bet'ore tbc l)roject is approyed. 'This assessment shocild evaluate all poteintial environmental effects, including air quality, noise polhition, and traf& impacts. I believe tliat the prriject shordd 1101be qualified as exempt under CBQA Catcgorica) Exen'tptio'n under section 15j332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects), Approval of tlie pro.iect may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air qiiality, or water quality. If this is not trae, I would like to receive the comprehensive report Uhatproves the above untrue.

2. Transparency on Contamination Issues:
o I seek sletailed repotts ori past contaminaticri issues associatet} witl'i the project site and how these will be addressed. Specifically, I wouI<l like to kllOW wliat tests will be c(+riducted, which substances are of concern, and liow clean-up measures will ensure soit and groundwater safety. As the Geo Trac}cer does not show furt'iier testing dorhe aftea: 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoixig Environmental Motiitoring:
o I propose tlte establisl'iment of a plan for ongoing environmental monitoring tlirougliout tlie construction and operational pbases. This plan should outline how soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction and inctude contirigency plans if vapor issues are detected during testing at the building perinit stage, I)rotecting the health of cbilclren, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:
o I reqciest tlie establisl"iment of a communit'y advisory board that imcludes residents, environtnental experts, ancl city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of lhe project. This will eiisu'e accountat'>ility and provide teside,nts with a 'voice in inonitoring tlie liroject's itnpacts.

5. Ade]la Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Riiil) to remnin in place:
o I strongly urge (he city to keel:i the K rnil closed to all traffic. Remoying the K barrier will }ikely lead to increased vehicle eir>issioiis, furtf'ier zlegrading air quality.

I request a compreliensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residen(s. Additionally, I advocate for noise le'vel testing to evaluate, tlie, effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air axid noise pollution levels if tlie barrier is removed. Engagixig l'iealth and enyironmenta) expeits to aiialyze tltese in'ipacts is essential.

I trust tl'iat you will give tliese concerns tbe attentior> they deserve.

Signl!!e 03-2'l,'205
Date:
t'bO 199
OPOSICiON AL PROYEC'lI'0 10130 ADELLA
(e! "Pio;6cto"). A contifiii he expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes correspondientes para corisiderar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientajes Exliaustivas:
o Solicito que cl desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (E4A) exhaustiva antes de que se impJemente cualquier unidad automatizada, Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos 10S posibles el'ectos ainbientales, inchtyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n acustica y 108 impactos en el trAfico. Cre<> que el proyecto no deberia ca}ificar como exento bajo la Exei'ici6n Categ6rica dc ia CEQA, segtu'i la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrol)o). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podi'fa tener efectos significativos en el trAfim, el iuido, la calidad del aire o }a calidad del agua. De no ser asf, me gustarJa recibir el inforirie completo que lo deimiestre.

2. Transpurencia sobre Problenias de Containinaci6n:
o BIISCO informes delallados sobre problemas de contaminaci6ii antcriores asociados con el sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordari. Especificamente, me guslaria saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, curies sustaz'icias son preocupariLes y c6mo las medidas de limpieza asegurarAn la seguridad dcl suelo y de) agua subterrAnea. Dado que el Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/OS/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Proporigo et establecimiento de un plan para el n'ionitOreio an'ibiental continuo tlurante las fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. F,ste plaii debc detailar c6mo sc reatiz.arA el monitoreo de vapor de suelo despu6s de la coxistrucci6'i'i e incluir planes de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor ilurante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger ia sahid de los iiifios, las poblaciones vu]nerables y todos los miembros de la comunidad es de tnAxima importancia,

4. Respoxisabilidad en }n Toma de Decisiones:
o Solicito c} establecimiento de lll'l consqio asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expertos en medio an"ibiente y funcionarios da ia ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ainbientales del proyecto. Hsto garantizarA la rendici6it dc cuentas y brintlarA a 108 residentes yina voz en el xnonitoreo de los impactos del proyecto. 5, La barrern (K Rail) de Ade}la Ave. perinanecerffi en su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidaniente a la ciudad a niai'itcner el K rail cen'ado a todo trThco.

Levantitr )a barrera del K probablen'iente conducirA a un auinento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradaiido nun mis la ca}idad di,l airc. Soiicito una evaluaci6n integraJ dc la calidad del aire para coniprender los posibles impactos en la salud de 108 residentes. AdemAs, abogo por realizaia prueba.q de nive)es de ruido pai-ct evaluar los efectos del aumento en cl flu,jo de trffico y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de contaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si se tevanla la barrera, Es eseric.ial involucrar a expertos cn sali.td :)7mediri arnbiente para analizar estos impactos.

C o en quc darAn a iones ja atenci6n que merecen.
lrllla Fecha
blotter
2=b(?;,
kob3200
(el "Pr6yecto"). A continuaci6n, h6 expuCsto mrs razoiies para -opoi-ierme y ras solicitudes corivspondientes para considerarcaznbiar mi oposiei6n:
i. Pruebas AmbjentaJes Exhaustivas:
0 Solicito que el desarro!lador realice una Evaluaci6n de Innpac.to Ambiental (EaA) exhai.istiva antes de que se imp}emente cualquier unidad automatizadn. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar 'todos los posibles efectos xunbienta)es, iiicluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaxninaci6ri ac€tstica y }os impactos en el trAfico. Crvo que cl provecto no deberfa cafificar como exenlo bajo la Exeuci6n Categ6iica de la CEQA, segt'in lasecci6nl5332 (CJase 32 - Proyectos de Desarro}!o). Laaproliaci6n del proyecto podria tetxer efectos significativos cn el trAfico, eJruido, la ca)idad del aire o la cafidad det agtia. De no ser asf, me gustarfa recibir el inforrne cornpleto que !o demuestre.

2. Transparencis soliaaeProblemas de Contaminaci6n:
o Buscoiitto>mesdeta]!adossobreproblemasdecomaminaci6nanteiioresasociados con el sitio del pmyecto y c6mo se abordari. Especfficainente, ine gustaria sabeir qu6 pruebas se reaiinran, cuAles sustaix,ias son preocupantes y c6mo fas medidas de Jirnpiez,Elasep,urai*n la seguridad del suelo y rlel agua subterrAnea. Dado que el (?eoTmcker no muestraI:irueLias adicionalesrealizadasdespu6s del 17/08/2021.

3. Moitoreo Ainbientai ("ontinuo:
o Propongc cl estabiecin>iento da l?ll p!an para el monitoreo ambientaJ continuo durante }as fases de construcci6n y opcraci6n. Este plai'i debe detallar c6nno se realiz.aiaAel m.oi:iitoreo de vapor de suelo dcspu6s de ta conslrucci6n e inciuir planes de contiiigeitcia si se detectan problemas de vapor luraiite las pruabas en la etapa de liermiso da construcci6n. Pmteger la sa}ua de 103 nifios, [as pob)aciones vtdnerabJes y (odos los mien'ibros de la comunidad cs de mAxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la Torna de Decisiones:
c SoJici.to el establecinuento cle un consejo asesor comuuitario que incluya a residentes, cxpertos eri medio ambientc y tuncioiiarios cl.ela ciudad para supervisar los aspectos ambientales del proyec(o, Esto garantizar4 la renctici6n de euentas y brin<farA a los residet:ites una VO7.en el inonitoreo de IOSimpactos ciel proyecto.

5. La bsrrera (]( Ratl) de Adeilq Ave. perinanecer6 en 811 lugar:
o l)rjo encarecidaunente a la ciudad a mautener cl K rail cerrado a todo tru'ico.

Lcvat'ilar ka barrera dcl K proLiablemente conducir"t a on aurnento en las en'iisiones de ve,hiculos, d.cgradai'ido a6n mis la calidad dei aitae. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la caJidad del airc para comprender 108 posib!es inipactos en la salud de 108 resi<!entes. Aaem6s, abo@opor reatizarpi'uebas dc ni'velesde iido paraevaluar (os efectos del aumento en el flujo cle trAijco y pot un monitoreo continuo de 108 niveles de contaminaci6n ciel aire y de! ruido si se levanta !a barrcra. Es esencia! invo!ucrar a expextos en salud y mcdio ambiente para aiyalizar estos impactos.

COllfiO en que darffi a estns preocupacxories !a atenci6n que merccen.

Firina Fecha
201
OPOSlCiON AJ., PROYECTO 10130 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto"'). A contimraci6n, he expuesto mis razones para oponernie y Las soiicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:
1, Pruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
0 Solicito que e! desarroliador realice una Evaluaci6n de impacto Ambiental (EIA) ex)iaustiva antes de qc'ie se imp}emente cuatquicr unidad autoniatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos ]os posibies efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire,, la contaminaci6n act'istica y los 'impactos en el trAfico. Creo quc el proyecto l!O deberfa calificar como exento ba3o lra'Hxenci6n Caleg6rica & la CEQA, segun is secci6n)5332 QC!ase 32 - Proyectos de I)csatroJlo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podrfatener efectos significativos en e! trAfico, ei ruido, Jacalidad del aire o la caiidad del agua. De rho ser asf, me g,ustarta recibir el inforrne coiyipleto que to demuestre.

2. Transpareneia sobre Probiemas de Contauiitiaci6n:
o 13usco informes detal!ados sobre prob)ei'i'i,a's de contarninaci6n anteriores asociados con al sitio del proyecto y c6mo se abordarAn. Especificamente, me gustgta saber Clue pruebas sex'ealizarAn,cuA]essusta.iiciasson preocupaxttesy c6mo }asmcdidas de limpieza asegmarAn la seguridad dei sueio y del agua subterrAnea. Daao que cl Geo Tracker no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s dei L7/08/2021.

3. Moiiitoreo Ambientai Continuo:
o Pyopongo el establecimiento de un pJaxi pai-a el rnonitoreo amL+ienta) contiuuo chn'antc )as fases de construcc,i6ii y operaci6u. Este plaix debe detallar c6mo se realizara el monitore,o de vaporde suelo despu6s de ta construcci6n S incluir ptanes de contingencia si se detectanliroblemas de vapor durante las prucbas eri la etapa de periniso de constxaucci6n. Proteger la salud de ios nifios, ias polylaciones vulnerables y todos [os miernbros cueta comunidad es de maxima impoitancia. 4, Responsabilidatl en la Toma de Decisiones:
o So)icito el estab}eeimiento da i.ui consejo asesor comunitario qtie incluya a resi6entes,exlyertos en medio bimbiente y fcincioi'iarios da la ciudad liara supervisar l.(JSaspectos ambiental.es del prciyecto, Esto garantjzar6 la rcndici6n de cuentas y brindarAa108 i'esidentes ui'ia voz en el inonitoreo de los irnl:iactos dei proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adeila Ave. permanecerffi en su lugar:
o tJrjo encarecidamentc a ka ciuded a mantener cl K raii ccrrado a tot}o tra'fico [.,evaiitarla barreradel K livobsblcmente conducirAa un at'imei'ito en ias emisiones da velifculos, c'!egradando El<usmis [a ca!idad del airc. Solicito una evaluaci6n integral de la calidad del aire para cotnprender IOS posibles iinpactos en ia salud de 108 residentes. AdemAs, abogo por cealizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para evaluar los cfectos del aun'xenlo en e! flujo de trAfico y por un monitoto continuo de log niveles de containinaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanta ia barrera. Es esea'tciai ixivo(ucrar a expertos On satuci y medio ambiente pura analizar estos impactos.

Confi.o co qrie daran a estas preoctipaciones la atcnci6n quc n*ereccn.

Firtna
-"'a/ a3 ):9,..<'-
Feel{a /
202
oposicMr At, PROYECTO !0130 ADELLA
Y(eol !oyYe'4o!4). A c6ntiOa!!!!!!, flexpuesto mis razones pnaeraoopOnongeor'niePylol\ics:loolilcO coi'respondientes para conside.iarcantbiar ini oposici6n:

I. Pniebas Ainbientaies Exhaustivas:
0 Solicito que ei desmrolIai.tor realice una Evaluaci6n de Irnpacto Ainbienta! (EIA) exhaustiva mtes de que se impfemcnte cualqtiier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos amliientales, incluyendo Ia ca]idaddelaire, la comaminaci6nacusticay tosinnl:iactosenel trAfico,Creo queel proyecto no deberia ca]iticar como exento bajo la E,xenci6n Categ6rica de ka CEQA, seg€tri kasecci6ixl5332 (C!ase 32 - Proyect.os do Desarrollo). la aprobaci6n dei proyecto podria tener efectos significativos en ei Mfico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la ca!idad del agua. De no ser asl me gustar{a recibir el informe cornp!eto que io demuestre.

2. Transparencia sobn Problernas de Contnminaci6n:
o Busco informes detallados sobre pmbiemas de coxitaminaci6n anteriores asociados con ej sitio dei proyectoy c6rnoscaliordarAn.nspecificamenle,tne @tstmia saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, ctxales sustancias 8011 preocupantes y c6rno las medidas de limpieza aseguraranla se@uridadel sueloy del iiguasubterrAnea.Dado queel Geo Tracker no mues['ra prueLias adicionales reaiizadas despu6s del t7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Centinuo:
o Proliongo eJ estabiecimienfode un plan paxaael monitoreo ambiental continuo dttrante !as fases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan debe dctallar comto se realizmTh e! monitoreo de vapor de suelo despci6s de la construcci6n e iiictuir p!anes <tecontirigenciasi sedetectanprobiemasdevapor duraixtelas liruel>Elsen la ctapa de permiso de construcci6n. Proteger ia sa}ud de }os nifios, Jas poblaciories vulncipbles y todos tos it"iiemtiros de la comtmidad es de rnAxima impoitmcia.

4. Responsabilidatl en ta Toma de Decisioxies:
o 8olicito el establecimieuto de un conscjo asesor comunitario que inciuya a residentes, ex)x,rtos en inedio ambiente v tuncionarios da Ia ciudad para supervisar los aspectosambientalesael liroyec(o. $sto garantizntAia rendici6n da tuentas y brindara a )os residentes una voz en el monitoreo de !os impactos del proyecto.

5. La barrera (K Raii) de Adella Ave. pertuaxiecerA en su lugar:
o !.Jrjo encarecidaniente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo tyAiico.

Levantar (a barrera dcl K probabtemente conducir6 z un aumento an !as crnisiones de veliicu)os, degi-adai'ido arin 111EIS(a calidud del ai;e. Solicito ma evaluaci6n ixitegra} de la ca)idad de) aire para con'iprenrier Jog posibles iri'ipuctos an ia salud de tos residentes. Ademas, tbogo por realizar pruebas de niaveles de ruido para cvaluar los efectos del autnento ei'b el flujo de trAfico y po:r un monitoreo contiiiuo de los niveies de contsminaci6n del aire y dei ruido si sc levanta la bartera. Es esenciai invo!ucrai: a expertos cm salud y medio ambierite para axializar cstos impac(os. (2onfio en que dar6n a estas preocupaciones !a ate.nci6n que merecenFee]ia t%'-'(203
(el "Proyeci:o"). A contrntiaci6n, he expuesto mis rnz6'nes para 6poffierine y r:s solicitudes coirespondientes para mnsiderar cambiar mi oposici6n:

L I)rtiebas Ambientaies Exlmustivas:
o Solicito que el desarcollador reatice una E'valuaci6n de Impacto Ainbieiital (EiA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier tmidad auomatizada, Esta evaiuaci6ii debe evaluar todos Jos prisibles efectos ambientales, incluyendo la calidad del aire, ![acontmninaci6h acThsticay los irripactos enel trAfico. Creo que ei proyecto no delyeria calificar (501110 excnto bajo !a Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segi'ui Ia secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyecl;os da Desatrolko), La aprobaci6n del pi'oyecto podra tener efectos significativos en el Mfico, cl ruido, la ca)idad del aire o ia calidad del agua. Dc no ser bi, me gustarfa rccibir el informe co'i'npieto qtie Io demuestre.
2, Transparencta sobre Prob)emas da Coittaminaci6u:
o Busco infon'nes detallados sobre problcmas de contaminaci6n tinteriores asociados cos'zel sitio deJ proyecto y c6tno w abordaran. Especfficamente, ine gustarfa saber queapruebas se reaJizarAn, curiessustancias SOll preocupantes :YC61IlOlas n':iedidas de limpieza asegurarAn !it seBwidad dci sueio y del agua suLiterrAnea.Dado quc el Geo Tracker no rnuestra pruebas adicionales reaJiidas despii6s del }7/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Contixiuo:
o Propoxi@o el estab!ecimiento de un p}aii para el monitoreo ambiental continuo duraiite las fascs <le constiaucci6n y operaci6ri. Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizarA ef monitoreo de vaporde suelo despues de ia constivcci6n e inclui.iaplanes de contingencia si se detectan problen'ias ck' vapor drirante !as pruetms en la etapa de permiso de consti'ucci6ii. I)roteBer la sahid de los nifios, las pobiaciones vu!.nerables y to<tos los miembros de la coirumidad es de rnAxiiiia importancia.

4. Responsiibiiidad eu ia Toma de Decisiones:
o Solici.to el establecimiento de un consejo asesor mmtmitario qrte incluya a residentes, cxpeitos en meclio ambientc y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar Jos aspectos ambientaJes c!el pro)iecto. Esto garantimrA la rcndici6n de Clle;litas y bx'inda>t a Jos residentes una voz an cl monitt:ireo dc }os impactos del proyecto.

5. T.ialiarrera (K Rail) de Adeila Ave. permanecerffi en gu lugstr:
o Ur.io encarecidamentca la ciudad a mantaner cl K rail cerrado h todo trAtico. Levantar la barreca del K probablen'tente couducirA a yui aumento en ias emisioncs de vehfc.ulos, degradando aun inks la calidad del airs. Soficito una evaluaci6rx integra) de la ca!idact del aire para comprender 108 posibles impactos ('Il la salud dc log resideiites. Adem6s, abogo por rcatizar pruebas de niyelcs de ruido pklTEl evaluar los efectosdeJatunentoan cl flujo detrAficoy lior un n'ionitoreocoiitinuo da!os txiveles de contaminaci6n del aire y de! ruido si se levai>ta Ja barrerci. Es eseiicial involucrar a expertos e.nsalud y i'i'iedio ambiente para tu-taliz;ar estos im'pactos.

Confio en que dar6n a estas preocupaciones ia atcnci6n que rhcrcceii. 7\1 ]aiJ-C,;),J ,.,$',(
tF7 204
OPOSICION AL PROY ECI'0 10130 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto"). A continuaci6n, l'ie expuesto mis razones para oponcrme y las solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambienta]es Exhaustivas:
o Soucito que e! desarrollador realice una Evaluaci6n de Jmpacto Ambiental (EJA) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cualquier unidad autoinatimda. Esta evatuaci6n debe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambientales, inc)uyendo la calidad del aire, la contamitxaci6i"i as<istica y 108 impactos en el tr6fico. Creo que el proyecto no deberfa calificar como exento bajo (a Exenci6n Categ6rica de }a CEQA, seB'anJasecci6nl5332 (Clase32-ProyectosdeDesarrotlo).Lmaprobaci6n del proyecto podi"ia teiier efectos significativos en el trAfico, cl ruido, la calidad del aire o l):l calidad del agua. De 110 scr asi, me gustarfa iaecibir eL informe completo (lt'ie lo demuestre.

2. TranspareneiasobreProb)emasdeContaminaci6n:
o Busco informes detaklados sobre prob)emas de contamiriaci6n anteriores asociados coo ek sitio del proyecto y c6rno se abordaran. Especificamente, me gustar(a saber qu6 pruebas se realizarAn, curies sustancias son preocupantes y c6mo }as medidas de limpieza asegurari ia scguridad del suelo y det agua subterrmea.Dado que el Geo Tracker no mucstra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del37/08/2021.

3. Monitoreo Ambientnl Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un plan para el monitoreo an'ibiental continuo durante las .tases de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este pJaii debc detallaia c6mo se realizarA e) nionitoreo de vapor de suelo despues de la constrcicci6n e iyicluir planes de contingencia si se detectari problemas dc vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Protegcr la salud de log nii'ios, }tis poblaciones vulnerables>i toc'toslos miembrosc'lela ccimunidadesdemaximaimportancia.

4. RespoxisabilidadenlaTomadeDecisiones:
o Solicito el establecimiento de t.m conse,jo ttsesor cornunitario que incluya a rcsitJentes, expertos en medio ambiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar los aspectos anibientales del proyccto. 12uo garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a los residentes IIIIEI voz en eI monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto.

5. La I>arrera (K Rail) de Adel)a Ave. permanecer6 en su lugar:
o tnjo encarecidarnente a la ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico. Levantar la barrera del K probablexpente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de veliiculos, degradando <i(ui mAs la calidad del aire. Soiicito una evaluaci6n integraldela caiidaddel aireparacoi'rxprender los posiblesiinliactos anla saludde losrcsidentes. Ademh, abogo por realizar prucbas de riiveles dc ruido para evaiuar Los efectos del aumento en ei flujo cte trAfico y por un monitoreo continuo de IOS niveles de contaminaci6n dei ttire v del iiiido si se le'vanta la barrera. Es esencial invoh'icrar a expertos ex"isal'ctd y m;d.io atnbiente para analizar 8stos irnpactos, Conffo ei'i qxie daran a cstas preocupaciones la atenci6n que mereceri. 3 - 2/'7' - m Z{
l'6clia
205
OPOSICION Al, PROYECI'0 10130 ADELLA
(el
o
"Pfoyecto"),
grc.llq E3ti MZ,) n'ieopongoalProyecto 10130AdeIla A continuaci6n, he expuesto mis razoneis para oponerme y Ias solicitudes correspondientes para considerar caintiiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruelias Ambientiiles Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollaclor realice una E'valuaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (EIA) exhaustiva antes de que se implements cua!quier unidad automatizada, Esta evatuaci6n dehe evaluar todos los posibles efectos ambientalcs, incluyendo la calidad del aire, la contaminaci6n ac'astica y los impactos en cl tx'=fico. Creo que el proyecto CEQA, segtIui
no debe.rta
la
calificar corno exento bajo la Exenci6n [email protected] de la secci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarro{lo). La aprobaci6n del proyecto podria terier efectos significativos en el tr6fico, el ruido, la calidad del aire o la calidad del agua, De i'io ser asi, me gustaria recibir el informe completo qrie lo demuestre. 2, Transparencia solyre Problemas de Contaminaci6i'i:
o Busco inforrnes detallados sobre problernas da contanffnaci6n anteriores asociados con el sitio det proyecto y c6mo se.abordarAn, Especificainente, me gustarfa saber que pruebas se reaLizarAn, angles susai'icias SOII preocupantes y c6mo las niedidas Geo
da limpieza asegurarAn la segt'iridad del suelo y del agua subterr6nea, Dado que el Tracker no muestra pruebas ad5cionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08/2021,

3. Moiiitoreo Ambientsl Conlintio:
o Propongo el establecin':iiento de un plan para e( monitoreo ambiental continuo durarite )as fases de construccion y operaci6ri, Este plaix debe detallar c6mo se realizarA el n'ionitoreo dc vapor de suelo despu6s de la construcci6n e incluir plaites de contingencia si se detectan problemas de vapor duraiite las pruebas en la etapa de permiso de coristrucci6n. I)roteger la salyid de los nifios, las poblaciones vulnerables y todos los miembros de la cotmmidad es de rnAxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en la '!l'oma de Decisiones:
c> Solicito el establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a residentes, expeitos en medio ambiente y 'Juncioriarios de la ciudad pma supervisar loS aspectos an"ibientales del proyecto. Esto garantizarA la rendici6n de cuentas y brindarA a loS residerites t.ma voz an e) monitoreo de los impactos del proyecto. 5, Ln barrera (I( Rail) do Adclla Ave. perntaxiecerA en su lugar:
o Urjo encarccidamente El ta ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trAfico. Levantar Ja barrera del K pmbablcmente conducirA a un aumento en lag emisiones de vehrculos, ciegradai'>do ntxri mas la calidad del aire. Solicito una evaluaci(>i'i ii"itegral da la calidnd dek uire para comprender los posibles impactos en la salud da los residentes. AdemAs, abogo por realizar pruebas de nive]es de ruido para e'valuat los efectos del aumento cn el ftujo de trThco y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de contaminaci6i'i del aire y de} ruido si se lavanta la batrera. ES esencial invo}ucrar a expertos en salud y medio ambicnte para analizar estos impactos.

Confio en que darAn a estas preocupacioites la atenci6n q'i.ie merecen.

F,ma h.. I=echa
tTh"l 206
OPOSICION AL PROYECTO lOi30 ADELLA
(el "Proyecto"), A continuaci6n,
correspondientes
lie expuesto mis razones para oponerme y las solicitudes para considerar camlyiar mi oposici6n:

1. Pruebas Ambientnles Exhsiustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador reaiice tina E'valuaci6n de Impacto Ambiental exhausti'va (EIA) nntes de que se implennente cualquier evaiuaci6n tinidad automatizada. Esta debe eval'uar todos los posibles efectos arnbientales, calidad incluyendo la proyecto
ctel
no
aire,
deberfa
la contatninaci6riacustica >i }os impactosen ei trafico. Creo que el CEQA, seg6n
calificar como exento bajo ia Exenci6n Ca[eg6rica de la del proyecto
la secci6nl5332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrollo). La aprobaci6n aire
podifa tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, la ca}idad de) que lo
o la
de.i'nuestre.
calidad det agua. De no ser asf, me Hustaria recibir el informe completo

2. Trangparencin sobre I)roblemns de Contaminaci6n:
o
con
Busco
el
irifoi'mes detallados sobre problemas de contan'iinaci6n anteriores asociados qu6
sitio dcl proyecto y c6mo se abordarem. Especfficamente, me gustaria saber de iimpieza
pruebas
asegurarAn
serealizarii,
la
cut'lessustaitciassonlireocupai'ites y c6molas n'iedidas Oeo Trackerno muestra
scguridad del suelo y del agua subterrAnea. Dado que el pruebas adicionales realiz.adas despu6s del 17/08/2021. 3, Moiiitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento
durai'ite
tk' un plan para el rnonitoreo ambiental conl:inuo
realizarA
las
el monitoreo
fascs de construcci6n y operaci6n. Este plan ttelae detallar c6mo se de contii'igencia
de vapor de sue.lo despu6s de ia constucci6n e ixicluir plaiies de, permiso
si sc detectait problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en la etapa 'vulnerables
de construcci6n. Proteger la salud de }os nifios, las pob)aciones y todos los nnembros de la comunidad es da mAxima importai'icia,

4. Respo'nsabilidad en la Toma de l)ecisiones:
o
residcntes,
Solicito el
expertos
establecimiento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incluya a 108
en medio ambiente y funcionarios de la ciudad para supervisar brindarA
aspectos
a
smbieritaies del proyecto. F,sto garantizara la rendici6n de cuentas )i los residcntes una voz en el n'ionitoreo de los impactos del proyecto,

5. Ls banaera (K Raij) de Adellii Ave. pertrianecerA eu su lugar:
o Urjo encarecidan"iente
Le'vantar
a la ciudad a ma'ittener el K rail cerrado a lodo trafico. de vehiculos,
la barrera
dcgradando
del K lirobablemenle conducirAaun aumentoenlasemisiones integral
a€iri mis la calidad dcl aire. So![icito una evaluaci6n de ia calidad dcl aire para comp'render tos residentes. Ademffis,
loS posibles impactos en la salud de abogo porrealizar pruebas de niveles de ruido para e'valuar niveles
los cfectos
de
ael aumento en el flujo de trAfico y por un moniloreo continuo de los contaminaci6ri del aire y del ruiclo si se levanla 1a barrem. Es esencial involy'icrar a expertos en satud. y medio ambiente para analizar estos impactos.

Confioertquedari'i aestaslaireocupaciones la aterici6nquen"ierecen. i%]ra<) p;/2,/.;2\/ ':xso
207
OPPOSITION TO 20130 ADELLAPROJEC'[
Project")Below,I haveoutlinedmy reasonsfor opposing and correspoxiding requests to consider clianging my opposition:

1. Coniprehensive Environinental I'esttng:
7' IrequesttbatthedeveloperconductathoroughHnvironinentalIn'ipactAssessment (EIA) before the Project is approved. This assessment should evaluate all potential envirorxmental effects, inc)uding air quality, xioise pollution, and traffic impacts. l believe that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CEQACategorical Exemption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmentai Projects). Approval of the project tnay result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is riot true, I would iike to receive the comprehensive repoit that proves the above unti'ue,

2. Transparency on Contaminatioxi Issues:
ks' l seek detailed reports on past contan'>ination issues associated with the project site and how these wilk be addressed. Specifically,Iwould like to lcnow what testa wil! be conducted, which substances are of concern, and how clean-up x'neasures will ensure soil and groundwater safety, As the Geo 'rracker does not show ftuther testing done afier 8/17/2021.

3. Ongoing li:,nvironmentaJ Monitoring:
i-d l propose the establishment of a plan For ongoing environmental monitoring throughout the construction and operational phases. This plan slioujd outline bow soil vapor monitoring will be conducted post-construction ai'id include contingency plans if vapor issues are detected dtring testing at the building perinit stage.

Protecting tlie health of children, vulnerable populations, and all community members is of utmost importance

4. Accountability in Decision-Making:

I request the establishtnent of a community advisory board that includes residents, environmental expeits, and city officials to oversee the environmental aspects of the project. This wiii ensure accountability and provide residents with a voice in monitoring tlie project's impacrs.

5. Adelia Ave. Concrete Barrier (K Rail) to remain tn place:

I stongly urge the city to keep the K rail closed to ali traffic. Removing the K bariier will likely leadto iiicreasedvehicleemissions,furtl'ierdeBrading airquality, Irequest a comprehensive air quality assessment to understand the potential health impacts on residents. Additionally, l advocate for noise level testingto evaluate the effects of increased traffic flow and for ongoing monitoring of air and noise poliutioxi lave}s if the barrier is removed. Engaging health and environmental experts to analyze these impacts is esscntial.

Ltrust that you wil) give these concerns the attention they deserve. 8'l, ";,Olr
Date
Thol 208
(el "Pto7 A 66nIinuacMri, lie=exphsto"ynirrazones para opoiierme y }as solicitudes correspondientes para considerar cambiar mi oposici6n:

1. I)ruebas Ambientales Exhaustivas:
o Solicito que el desarrollador realice uia E'valuaci6n de Impacto Ambiental (Exh) exhaustiva antes de que se implemente cuatquier unidad automatizada. Esta evaluaci6n debe evaltiar todos los posibles efectos mnbientales, incJuyendo la calidad del aire, }a contaiuinaci6n acustica y los impactos en el trAfico. Creo que el proyectono debertacalificar como exento ba3o la Exenci6n Categ6rica de la CEQA, segt'uiJasecci6n 15332 (Clase 32 - Proyectos de Desarrolio). Laaprobaci6n del proyecto podrfa tener efectos significativos en el trAfico, el ruido, kacalidad del aireo !a calidaddel agua. De no ser asi, me @ustarfarecibir el infomie complcto que lo dcm=strc.

2. Transparencia sobre Problenias de Contaminaci6n:
o Busco informes deta}lados sobre problemas de contamiriaci6n anteriores asociados COII el sitio dei proyecto y 061710 se abordarAn. Especfficamente, me gustaria saber qu6 pruebas se reafi:zarm,cuAles sustancia.q son preocupantes y c6rno fas medida.q de Iimpieza asegttrarAn la seguridad del suclo y del agua subterrmea. Dado que el Geo Trackei: no muestra pruebas adicionales realizadas despu6s del 17/08!'2021,

3. Monitoreo Ambiental Continuo:
o Propongo el establecimiento de un ptan para el nionitoreo ambiental continuo durante las faqes de construcci6n y operaci6n, Este plan debe detallar c6mo se realizara el monitoreo dc vapor de suejo despu6s de la constnicci6n e incluir planes de contingencia si se delectan problemas de vapor durante las pruebas en IEI etapa de permiso de construcci6n. Protcger la salud de 108 ifios, tas pobluciones vulnerablcs y todos los mien"ibros de la comunidad es de mAxima importancia.

4. Responsabilidad en JaToma de Decisiones:
o Solicito el establecirniento de un consejo asesor comunitario que incliiya a residentes, expertos en medio ambien(e y funcionarios de la ciudad para supcrvisar los aspectos ambienta}es dei proyecto, Esto garantizarA }a rendici6n <le cuentas y biindarAa tosresidentesunaVOZenel monitoreodelos impactosdelliroyecto.

5. La barrera (K Rail) de Adella Ave. permanecerA en so lugar:
o Urjo cncarecidamente a ta ciudad a mantener el K rail cerrado a todo trafico.

Levantar la barrera del K pro'bablemente conducirA a un aumento en las emisiones de vehiculos, degradando a€'in mis la calidad tlel aire. Solicito una evatuaci6n integral da la calidad del aire para comprender los posibles itnpactos en la salud de los residentes. AdemAs, abogo pot rcalizar pruebas deniyeles de ruido paraevaluar los cfect6s dcl aumento en el flt0o de trMco y por un monitoreo continuo de los niveles de conlaminaci6n del aire y del ruido si se levanla la barrera, Es esencial involucrar a expettos cn salud y medio ambiente para ana?izar estos impactos. 5 ab= 2d,5'
\otO 209
OPPOSJ.TXONTO 10!30AJ)ELJ,APRO3ECT
roJee,t'=)Beloq rhave-outlinedmyreaeonsfo-r- opposinBffidcorrespondinBrequeststo consider changinBmy opposition:
o IrequesttbatthedevelopereonduazitboroughEnvironmentalImpactAssesment (E!A) bdoret}ic Projectis 'zppmvea-This asBesrttaat sbouM e'valuateall potentiai envirmunental effecta, incJuding air quAty, noise poktion, aantltraffic impams, X ievetlxatthep,mjectshould XIOIbe quiified asexempt under CEQA Categorical emptionunderspction15332(Claes,32';DevelopmentalPro,iecis). Appmval of theprojectmayzsuititi 4nificant effects re!sting totraffic, noise, air quality, or water quiity, If this is not tnie, I would. like to receive tlxe wmpreben,mve report tbatpxrms the above mtiue.

2. Trangpareuey on Contsatninatjen Nssuesz
o ! seekdetailedrepoitsonpastcontmninationissuesassociatedwitli thepro3effi site andhow these wm be addreaed- Specificaiiy, I wouldliketo kno*whatteets win bc con(lLlcted, vbich subatancesaxeof concein, and how clean-up measures will ensure soil and groundwater safety. As the Geo Tracicer does not a,hoiy ftutber tesiing doneaher 8/17/2021

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I yropose tbe estab)isbmentof a plan fo,r ongoinB environmentalmonttorixig throughout the construction and operational phases.':'his plan shoxild outline h<m eoil vapormonito,riaigwillbe mmudedpost-consttbctionsdincludeeontingency p)its if vapor issues m deteeted di'ring testing at the builang pexmit ,Mag,e, Protecting the bea2th of clukhen, vulnerabie populations, a'r:idall comxrity members is of titinoat importance,
4, AceountabiJity 'm Deeiaiion-Making:
o :[yei.quegttheestab]ishrnentofacomnu'inityadvisoryboardthatincludesresiaemg> envitonineittal exper!'s, and city officials to oversee the envimnmental aspeds of ffieprojst TkNsvill ensure ountabi!ity aad pro'vide rebidents witb a voice mi moito*xB theproJegt'sinipacts,

5. AdellaAve.ConereteBawier(KRafl)toremajhinplaee:
o J sffinglyr urgetlie city to keeptbh K rail closedto all traffic, RamovinB theI( batrieydJ likely ieadto iriareased'vehicleemissions,l'iutmrdeBrndLnBair quality, !x'cqtle!'ta COmpl'ebellSi'Ve* quality meSgnenttO urxbstand thepotemialliealtb impacteonresidents.Ad<[itionally,I advocatafornoiseieveltestin@toevaluatethe cffects of iareased flaffic flow end for ongoing monitoring of air and :ixoise poliution levels if the bariier is remoyed. Engaging lieaitb and envimmrientel experts to analyzethese impacts is essential.

Iffusttkt concerns the attenijon they deserve.
5a.;;;31mr
210
OPPOgXTXO?%?TO10130ADELLAPROJECT
I -%t(&)l gt(X\)5'4 a=-"l-'-=' .amopposingtbelOl30AdellaProject(the "Project")Belov4'Ibaveouttinedmyreasonsforopposing andcon'espondingrequeststo coiisider diangirB my opposion:

1. ComprehengjveEnironmentajTeat'ings
o !:requestthatthedevelopetaconductathoroughEnvironmentallmpactAssessynent (EJA) be:fvrethe Prrg3cuis approved.T.bisassesmentshoJd ammte aTlpoteotial eovironinentaieffects,iixclud% ir qtiality, noise pollutNor4arid trs impacts,1 be)ievetimttheprojectshouklnot be qtmified asexempt underCEQA Categorical E,ymptiox wder sectio,ix15332 (CJas432-Developmenta?Pmjsts). Approval i theprojectmy resuIltin significauteffectsrelat% to tt4c, xiotse,ir qThality,or whet qtmity. Jf tis is not tiwe, I would. liIce to receive d'ie comprehensivereport fhatpmtcs the above untrue.

2. T'cansparency on Contaznination :[sgues:
o Iseekdetailedrepoxtsonpastcontaininatioriissuesasgociatads,;vitlitheprojectsite andhovi theseill be adareased.Specifically, 'J:'wouldliketo know wbattestswin be conducted, svhich subhtancesare of convrn, hovvclean-up .rneasmesx41l erimre so51;ind ground*ater.afety, As the Geo Tracker does not mow further fes!ing doneaf.ter8/17/202"l.

3. Ongobg Environmental Moitorjrag:
o Xpxopc>sethe establi*ancrita;>fa pig for origoinB en'itironmental mo.uitoring throu,ghoutthe coxxstructionand operatiom phases.'X!iis planshomd o'mliae hoq so5ivapormonitoringwillbe conductedpost-constnictionandinclude contingency plmis if vapor issues aiw deteeW d'gririg istiisg, at the lmilding perm:it stage, Protecting the Ixealth of clThldren,vulnerable populations, and il couity membersThof utmost importance,

4. Aeeoantabi)ity in Deemio.n-Makixigi
o Irequesttheesfablisbrneinofacommuni:tyadvisonboardtbatim.]udes,reiden's, environrnqntal eei% and city officials to overseethe enviromnerital aspectsof the pipject. Ths 'will ensm'eaccomtabiJity md pro'vide tesidents with a voice m monitoxig the project's irnpagts,

5. AdeIjaAve,ConereteBaryier(KRail)toremajtiJp}aee:
o I sffioqly urge ffie city to kegp the K rail closed to il traffic. Rennovirig the K lm:ierva Likely!eedto increasedvebic.leemiss.ions,fmther degradtngair quality. .lj:equegtmcomp.phensiveairquality ssaeggmenttout:idersUmdfhepoten!jallxealtb irnpactsonrmdents,AddNtionany,Iaavocatefornoise leve}tegtin@toevaluatethe efteds of incr.easedtaffic :flOWand for on@oirigmonitoring of air aiid .izoise po,l}ution levels if the bmEer is ,removed. Engaging health mxi environmelal expms to analyzetheseimpacts aisessential
Itrustt7$se concerns theattentionthey daserve.

Signatux I)atel 5} WAS-"-
211
OPPOSNTXONTOlOi30AD:[i:LLAPROJECT
I -(',J,#>t'>IS,'ki9!"e:..,:a,: . ,mi opposingtbe10130AdellaProjcct(the <"Project"):Below, I haveoutlinedmyreasonsforopposingaixdconvspondiriHrequeststo considm clxanBingmy opposition:
1, ComprehensiveEnvXronanehtal Te,t'%x
o IrequeatthatthedeveloperconductathorougkEnvironxnentailmpactAseessment (EiA)beforetlie Project is Etpp'a/ea. Thin fflsesSment Should6Val8h enpotmtial em4tonmesaleffects,*xclming air quality, noise ponutjon, and mfl'ie impacts,. I beJievethattheprojectslxomdnot beqmified asexemptunder CEQACategorical' Exemptiontuiderseason15332 (Class,32,-Developme,mal Prjecis). Appcova3 of theprojectmayre3ultinsignifieantdfectsrelatit@ to ttaff:ic,noise,* q0ality, or wsaarquaJity.If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensive *poxt thatproves the above tiritue2. Transpayauey on Contamination Nsgues:
o Iseekdetailedreportsonpamcontaxninationisstiesessociatedsyitbtlie;projeusite andhoyx thei ml beaddressed.Bpecifically, I 'wouldhke to kno* vhatteatswill beconduaed,vtltich substancesge of concern, and ho"w cleg-up measures will engire soil and ground*ater safety, As the Geo 'rrackerdoes not myoyv:bther iesting done after 8/17/202!.

3. Ongoing Environmental Monitoring:
o I pmpom the establiiment of a pJmi for ongoing environmental monitoring tiaouglxout ihe constuctioy:i and operational phases. TJaisplan should oit'l.tne ho* soi! vapormonitoringwillbe co:aductedpost-constructiorxadiiicludeeonting,ency pliis if vaporimiyesare deteeted&n% testingat tlie buildingpermit sfage.

P,votacti'ixgthe heaJtli o' children, vulnerable popumoq and a!l comrnmay membem b of utmost irnoxtance.
4, A.egountabilJty ia J)ee4siop-Malcing:
o :[requesttlieaatablislmenCofacommuztityadvisoryboardthatinc)udegreaident'g,, exr*o:rimenta! expex% and city officials to oversee the env3ronmental aspectsof b ptoject This wait ensure accomtabiiity and proySfla reidents 'sv7ttha voice S mu;ii:om,g the pxu3cct's inxpacts,

5. AJeUa Ave. € onerete Barrier (J( Rail) to yemain Knplmee:
o I gtior41y urge the city to keep the K mii closed j:o ail traffio, Regovuig t!ie K baxrie wjlllike}y }eadto irteremedvelticle emissions, fiii"her degradtng airquality.

Lreguesta comprehensiveam quality asgessmenttoun&rstand iepoteaaiil'iealt)x irnpactsonresidents.Additional}y,!advomefornoise ieveitestingtoeyaiuatethe effects of inqeased tiffic :flOW and for oqoing monitoring of air and noise pollution levels if the l>ai#er is removed. Engagiiig health and envmnmental expeits to analyze tbese 4mpacts is essentiat.
ttusttfflheseconce:tns ffieattefflioix theydese.ive.

C!ty.A:'f:*:a,4<ft:'6@ ;@4JtTh
8ignatute -
'iht;iBt,x'
t"'t} 212
OPPO8ffiON TO IO130ADELLAPROJEeT
oject"):Below,Ihaveoutuffiedmyreagcirisf.or opposingmd corresponetingrequeststoconsider changinBmy opposition:

1. Comprebensjve EgvhaoamentalTest'ngg
o Irequestthatthedeve}operconductatboroughEmironmentalImpactAsse,q.tnent (ELA)beforetbe Pzvjectis ap@'ovedTMsmiseasmentsbouldevgl'mtb anpotential envimmnaxxtaieff'ects,includinB air quality, noisepollutior4 emdtraffic impac'Ui, l believeiatthep,mjectshouldnot 'beqtfflifie.d asexemptunderCEQA Categorica} Eyemptionmde:r seckn 15332 (Clasa32-Developmental%jecta)- Appmval of fheprojectmayresultiBsig,ificaffleffemre!e%totraffic,noise,airqTha!ity or mTmquality.Xfthisisnott'ae,I woul4liketo receivethecomprehensivere3por( tbat pmves the aboye utih'ue.
2, Trausparmey ownContamination Nssueg:
o .!Seelcdetailedi'epOrfflonpa8t00ntfflninatiOni8SueSO#OciatedWithtlieprojeatsite and 'lio'w these 'viu be addressed. SpecificalRy, l wouM like to know*tattests wXl,l ?OCconducted, wl'uch aibstmces J!IE of conceip, and Jiow eJeg-up measures xrill ensure son and gromd*ater dety, As the Gco Tracker does not show irther tetuig doneaiter 871'7/2021.

3. Ougo}ng :a'uviron.mental Monitoring:
o i ;pmposethe est'a'bMm:ien.tcif a plm for ongoinB envimnmental morutoi% tmo4brxtt the constrtx'tion andoperationalphases.'!iis,olan shouk! omlinehov eoNlvaporrnonitorixxgivin'be comuctedpost-constuctionandinclude contingency pliis if vapovisgties are deteeteddurmg test% at the ly'i."iilding pei'mit stage.

PxotectinB tlxe health of clnld'ceri, vulnerable populaHoris, sd all cornirim;ty 'members u of utmost importaaca.
4 AeeountabUity ba D*etsion-lMakingx
o Irequegttheestablishmentofacommunityadyisoryboardthatincludesresidents, mvirorunental experts, ad city of&jals to oversee the environmenta! aspects of the project This vial ensure accomlabi!ity and proVide remdentsi;'!h a vois in xnoii@x%a@theproject%impacts,

5. AillaAve.(,onereieBarxier(E:Rail)torema'mfn'pNaee:
o I siomz!y urge the city to keep ffie K raiJ c!ozd to all traff'ic, RemovmBthe K banieswil} likely leadto :axareaseA'id'iieJeemmionsJurthexdegra&xg airqaali'ty.

Ireguest acomprebausive air quity assessmentto uri&rstandthepgtentia1 health jmpacts onreeidents.Adclitionally, I abocatc fo;rnoise ievel testing to evaluate the cffcr:m of increased traffic flo* ad for ongoing monito*g of air md noise polfutton ie'vels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health axid envi'ronmemal experts to ai'ialyze these tmpacts is esserxtial.

Itrust\a''vet$e concei:ns theattentiori theydesexve.
r,, u":" AiQW sat41,31xti.-.
t"l! 213
OPPOSJ:TXONTO lOi30AWLLAPROJECT
chariBinBmy opposition:
1, ComprehmMve Environraenta] 'l'esUng:
o IrequestthatthedevekipereonduetathomugbEuviie.ipactAssemnent (EIA) bdoretheProjegtisapprovd. Tie msessmentsbouidevalmte all potmtW en*oninental r=ffect4 including * quaiity, noise po:fiution, and 'a:ac impacts, I be!lieveihattheprojectsbouldnotbequalifiedasexemptunderCEQACategorical' e.xuptionundexabaclion 15332(Clasr432-DevelopmentaJPro%ts). Approval of theprojectmayresultin significantefThmrdatinHto traffic,noise,air qmlity, or ter qua!ily,!ftlus 5snot true,l would like to receive the co;aipre'hensive:ipoit tbstprmesibeabove mirue.

2. l'ransparaney on ConfamRnation Jaues
o Iseekdetailedrepmtsonpastcontaminationissuesaasociatedwfflitbeprojectsii:e andho*these wm be addressed.Specifically, Iwouldlike to ktmw vv.battestsadl begorxdttcfed, whiahaibatances are of concern, and how cleari-up ;tneasureswill erieure soil am gt'oundwater safety. As the Geo Traa<a' does not show further testing done afiv 8/17/2021-

3. Ongoing Envjronraental Monitoring:

I yopoae me establigbmentof a plan for ongoinB env#omnentalmonitocJnB throughouttbe constructioyx and operationi phases. Tliis plan should outJin*hosoi! vapoz.tnonitonnigwil} be conducted post-eonstmctionandirxclude contingency plim if 'spor 4mes are detected mg tes% at the bui'kliiigpermit stage, Protectirag the health of chiklren, vulnerable populajjon,s, d sll cornmanity members Ssof utmoatimpomnoe,
4e Aceountabiliiy b J)eeXsion-Miiking:
o Irequesttheest.alylishmentofacommuityadixisogbomdtbaiineludegresibnts, environmental experts, ad city offiaials to oversee the environmental a,qpectsof the project, This wall ensure accomtabiLity md provide residents with h voice in rrxonitorixxgthe project's impacts,
5, AdelNmAwe. Conerete Barrier (K Rail) to yemain in place:
o I sionBly uiBe the c'0 to keeip*c K mu closedto ail trde, RainovinH the K ba'o;iffWJ'lJikely ieadtoincreasedvehicleemissiona,ftirtherdegraauBairquali7, i .reguestacomprehensive * quality assessmentto uadeastandthepotentiaLb.ealtb irripmtso.rrresidents.Additioually, i advomtebx noise leveltestinB to evakuatethe dX of ;nms;e;rl traffic 'J'w and for ongoingmo:itorinB of tar and noise po}iutioxi levels if the barrier is removed. Engaging health en-'vtroumeml expeit9 10 analyze these impacts is essenttaI.

I trusttbai;Vt'Bt@e concernsfbeattentioniey deserve.

Date: -il-zt,rIz.c'
tffl5 214
OPPOSII'lON TO 10730 ADELLA PROJECT
Project") Below, 1 have outliried my reasons for opposing and corresponding requests to consider changing my opposition:

1. Comprehensive Environmental Testing:
o IrequestthatthedeveioperconductathoroughEnvironrnentallmpactAssessment (E[A) before the Project is approved, This assessment should evaluate all potential envimnmental effects, including air quality, noise pof}ution, and traffic impacts. I lyelieve that the project should not be qualified as exempt under CHQA Categorical Exexuption under section 15332 (Class 32-Developmental Projects). Approval of the project may result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If this is not true, I would like to receive the comprehensi've report that proves the above untrue,