South Gate City Council
July 22, 2025

261

4. EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as City deems necessary.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this AmendmentNo. 1 to be executed and attested by their respective officers hereunto duly authorized.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

BY:

Maria Davila, Mayor
Dated:

ATTEST:

BY:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO ORM:

By:

F. Salinas, City Attorney
GENERAL PUMP COMPANY, INC.:

By:

Michael Bodart, President
AS13772.0860872 4900-7526-5105vl

262
Fiscal 2025 / 2026

BID SCHEDULE

ON-CALL MUNICIPAL WELL MAINTENANCE
No. Description Unit Unit Price
I Mobilization and Set Up and Demobilization Each $ 618 l
Video Camera Survey Eacli $ 1,236
3 Wire Brush and Bail Well Per HR $ 464
4 Well Development by Surge BlOCk and Air Lift;
conduct surge block and air-lift well development. and dispose of pumped water.

Per HR 670
I
5 I
Discharge Compliance with Appx. 600 feet of Teinp Piping and Baker Tank
Eacli 5 7,416
6 Well Development by Surge Block and Air Lift Per HR $ 670 i7
Install Puinp (200 F-IP) for Well Development and Testing
Lump Sum $ 9,167
8 Well Redevelopment Pumping Per HR $ 155
9 Step-Drawdown Test Per HR $ 155
I
10 Constai'it Rate Discharge Test Per HR $ 155
11 Spinner Flowmeter Logging Lump Sum $ 4,429
12 Pump Removal and Inspection (up to 250 of column depth)
Lump Sum $ 9,167
113
Well Disinfection (Well Depth 1,000 feet, 18" Dia.) LllmP Slllll $ 1,236 14 Site Security, Safety and Noise Coi'npliance Lump Sum $ 515 15 Reconnect all the Electric Wiring Per HR $ 206
16 Pulling and Installatiot'i by Two Workers, Rig, and Service Tnick
Per HR $ 464
17 Each Additional Rig Helper Per HR $ 77
P -5
Exhibit "A"
263

BID SCHEDULE

ON-CALL MUNICIP AL WELL MAINTENANCE
No. Descriptioxi Unit Unit Price
18 Well Cleanout Work; Cable Tool Metliod; Two
Workers, Rig and Service Tnick
Per HR $ 206
19 Well Cleanout Work; Airlift Method. Two Workers, Rig, and a Service Truck
Per HR $ 216
20 Air Coinpressor Cliarge 600 CFM or Larger Per HR $ 52 Labor Rates
21 Crane 40 to 50 Ton with One Operator Per HR $ 309 22 Rotaty Crane 12 to 39 Ton wit)i One Operator Per HR $ 288 .J3 Hydraulic Crane 5 to 12 Ton witli One Operator Per HR $ 88 24 Field Service. Service Man and Delivery Truck Per HR $ 77 25 Field Service, Service Man and Service Truck Per HR $ 175 26 Field Service, One Worker and Welding Truck Per HR $ 175 27 Field Service: Electrician Per HR $ 196
28 Sliop Labor: General Shop Work Per HR $ 77
29 Sliop Labor: Premium Shop Work Per HR $ iis
30 Shop Labor: Machine Sliop Work Per HR $ 118
31 Sliop Labor: Metal Spray Labor Per HR $ 77
3 .-) Shop labor: Welding Shop Work Per HR $ 77
33 Engineering Per HR $ 77
34 Hydrogeologist Per HR $ 77
35 Video Logging, dual cainera-VHS and DVD Per HR $ 1,236 36 Travel Time: to and from job site per man Per HR $ 77 37 Operator Oveitime: Weekdays Per HR $ 77
P -6
264

BID SCHEDULE

ON-CALL MUNICIPAL WELL MAINTENANCE
No. Description Unit Unit Price
38 Operator Standby Time Per HR $ 77
39 Cost of furnisliing both Performance and Labor
Bonds (As a percentage of Contract Ainount)
Percentage 2 %
Attacli your finn"s standard rate scliedule for labor, i'iiaterials, and equipment. (See Note 2 below)
Attached
Please specify if a ininii'num time is billed for each call if requested by t)'ie C ity to report to Work:
4 Hours.

Notes:

1. Unit Rates in the Bid shall include mark-ups, overhead, and profit.

2. Tlie rates shown on the firm's standard rate scliedule shall include mark-ups, overhead, and profit. If in case the standard rate schedule does not include mark-ups, overhead, and profit, append an attachment showing the necessary allowances for mark-ups, overhead, and profit.

Terms of Extension
A contract entered witli Bidder may be extended for LIP to two separate, consecutive periods of one year eac)i at tlie option of tlie Owner. The maximuin percentage rate increase for extension will be according to the "Construction Cost Index of Engineering News Record" as applicable to the Los Angeles Region and subject to the approval of tlie Owner:

Bidder acknowledges tliat Owner may enter contracts with more tlian one Bidder. Owner does not promise or guarantee tliat Contractor's services will be called upon at any time or at all.

CONTRACTORS WILL BE SELECTED THROUGH THE EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS AND BiD BASED ON APPLYING LABOR, MATERIAL, AND EQUIPMENT RATES IN THE BID TO A SAMPLE JOB. THE

CONTRACTORS WILL THEN BE AWARDED CONTRACTS AND PLACED ON THE

ON-CALL LIST IN AN ORDER DETERMINED BY THE LOWEST BID Accompanying tbis proposal is tlie bidder's security consisting of B!d BOnd payable to the City of Soutl'i Gate in tlie amount of $10,000 and t)ie undersigried bidder liereby agrees that sliould lie be awarded a contract on tlie basis hereof, and thereafter fails to properly execute and return tlie contract agreeinent togetlier with tlie required bonds in connection tlierewitl'i witliin ten P -7
265
' flit '
Item No. 3
rUL 16 202i-: (D:2r
FILED City of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA IBTLL
DepartmentDirector:

SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR

THE MANAGEMENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROGRAM AND THE FAT, OIL,

AND GREASE CONTROL PROGRAM
PURPOSE: To approve a three-year Agreement with John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., for the management of the City of South Gate's ("City") Industrial Waste ("IW") Program and the Fat, Oil, and Grease ("FOG") Control Program.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider:
a. Approving the Agreement with John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc. ("JLHA"), for the management of the Industrial Waste Program and the Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program, for a three-year term, in an amount not to exceed $194,691; and b. Authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

FISCALIMPACT: ThereisnoimpactontheGeneralFund.TheAgreement,totaling$l94,691, will be funded through Sewer Funds. The cost of services is distributed over three years: $63,000 in Year 1, $65,000 in Year 2, and $67,000 in Year 3. Year 1 services are included in the Fiscal Year 2025/26 0perating Budget.

ANALYSIS: The proposed Agreement with JLHA ensures continued compliance with state- mandated Waste Discharge Requirements ("WDR") for sanitary sewer systems. The City relies on these programs to protect its sewer infrastructure from damage caused by discharges of industrial waste and fats, oils, and grease. The comprehensive management and inspection services provided by JLHA are critical for maintaining regulatory compliance, minimizing environmental impacts, and safeguarding public health.

The competitive procurement process demonstrated that JLHA remains the most qualified and experienced consultant to provide these services, given their long-standing successful performance and deep understanding of local conditions and regulatory requirements. The recommended three- year contract with a not-to-exceed amount of $194,691 reflects a fair and reasonable cost to maintain program continuity and quality.

By continuing to leverage JLHA's expertise, the City can ensure effective program management, 266
timely inspections, enforcement actions when necessary, and ongoing community education to support compliance. This approach mitigates risks of sewer system failures and associated environmental penalties, ultimately providing cost savings and operational reliability over the long term.

BACKGROUND: TheCityownsandoperatesasanitarysewersystemconsistingofoverll9 miles of pipelines, which collects sewage from residential, commercial, and industrial properties citywide. This system must be managed in accordance with state-mandated requirements to ensure safe and reliable operation.

To comply with the State Water Resources Control Board's 2006 WDR Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems, the City implements two key programs: the IW Program and FOG Control Program.

These programs regulate facilities that generate or dispose of industrial wastewater and FOG, helping to prevent harmful discharges that could damage the City's sewer infrastructure or impact the environment.

In South Gate, approximately 240 active businesses hold Industrial Waste Discharge Permits.

These businesses are inspected between one and four times aru'iually, depending on the nature of their operations. Permitted businesses are also required to maintain on-site treatment systems, such as grease traps or sand and grease interceptors, to filter harmful substances from wastewater before discharge. While permits are valid for five years, ongoing compliance is monitored through routine inspections to safeguard the integrity of the sewer system.

The Department of Public Works utilizes the services of an environmental consultant to manage the City's IW and FOG Control Programs. For many years, JLHA has provided consistent and effective oversight of the program as the City's consultant. Their comprehensive support services include program management, inspections of new and existing commercial and industrial businesses, and enforcement of Municipal Code Chapter 6.62 (Industrial Waste). Additionally, they evaluate and process Industrial Waste reports, review and approve developer plans, implement Quality Assurance ("QA") procedures, educate the public, and participate in community events to promote awareness and compliance with the programs.

JLHA's contract recently expired, prompting staff to initiate a competitive procurement process for a new agreement. On May 8, 2025, a Request for Proposal ("RFP") was issued to qualified consultants to provide professional services for the management of the IW and FOG Control Programs. One proposal was received on June 9, 2025.

On June 16, 2025, a Selection Committee of City staff evaluated the proposal. The evaluation criteria included the firm's experience; program understanding and approach; knowledge of local, state, and federal laws and regulations; and quality control and assurance measures.

Based on the Committee's evaluation, JLHA is recommended for the contract. Under the new three-year agreement, JLHA will continue to provide the services described above, with a total fee not to exceed $194,691.

Established in 1985, JLHA is an environmental consulting corporation specializing in assisting 267
over 40 local municipalities with water quality and conservation programs. Their extensive experience includes implementing state programs for NPDES water quality, sewer spill prevention, industrial waste and fats, oil, and grease control, water conservation, and recycling.

Their services include program administration, planning, reporting, and funding. The FOG element of their IW Control Programs is to address the State Water Board's 2006 Waste Discharge Requirements Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems ("888 WDR"), which includes food service establishment permitting, FOG-oriented inspections and education, and hot spot identification.

ATTACHMENT: Proposed Agreement (including Exhibits A and B) MR:1C
3 268

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE

MANAGEMENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROGRAM AND FAT,

OIL, AND GREASE CONTROL PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE AND JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

This Agreement for Professional Services for the management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program ("Agreement") is made and entered into on July 22, 2025, by and between the City of South Gate, amunicipal corporation ("City"), and John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., a California corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

RECIT ALS
WHEREAS, City desires to retain a qualified provider for certain services relating to as- needed professional services for the management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program; and
WHEREAS, Consultant warrants to City that it has the requisite skills, knowledge, qualifications, manpower and expertise to perform properly and timely the Professional Services under this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, based on such representation, City desires to contract with Consultant to perform the services as described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A" of this A greement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. City hereby engages Consultant, and Consultant accepts such engagement, to perform the services set forth in the Scope of Services as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part of this Agreement. The Scope of Services may be mutually amended from time to time by both Parties in writing.

2. COMPENSATIONFORSERVICES. ThetotalamountofcompensationforthisAgreement shall not exceed the sum of One Hundred Ninety-Four Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-One Dollars ($194,691) as described in Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A." and Exhibit "B" City shall pay Consultant for its professional services rendered and costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved in writing by the Director of Public Works or his/her designee.

2.1 Consultant shall be required to attend meetings at City Hall as necessary in the delivery of the projects. Travel time between Consultant's office and City Hall shall not be billable. Consultant may request an exemption on a case-by-case basis, which shall be subject to City approval.

2.2 Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the schedule included in Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A." City shall pay Consultant within thirty (30) days 5116863.1-L235.0 (Fomi Rev. 01/17/23)
269
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

of receipt of the invoice.

2.3 No payment made hereunder by City to Consultant, other than the final payment, shall be construed as an acceptance by City of any work or materials, nor as evidence of satisfactory perfornnance by Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement.

3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement is effective as of July 22, 2025, and will remain in effect through July 21, 2028, through the completion of the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A", unless otherwise expressly extended and agreed to by both Parties in writing, or terminated by either Party as provided herein. The City reserved the right to extend the Agreement for two consecutive one-year terms in accordance with the rates negotiated in the attached Fee Proposal.

4. CITY AGENT. The Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, for the purposes of this Agreement, is the agent for City. Whenever approval or authorization is required, Consultant understands that the Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, has the authority to provide that approval or authorization.

5. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Consultant represents that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in any real property located in the City which may be affected by the services to be perfornned by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant further represents that in perfomiance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Within ten (10) days, Consultant agrees that it will immediately notify City of any other conflict of interest that may exist or develop during the term of this Agreement.

5.1 Consultant represents that no City employee or official has a material financial interest in Consultant's business. During the term of this Agreement and/or as a result of being awarded this Agreement, Consultant shall not offer, encourage or accept any financial interest in Consultant's business or in this Agreement by any City employee or official.

6. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

6.1 Termination for Convenience. City may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause by giving fifteen (15) days written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of City, become its property. If this Agreement is terminated by City as provided herein, Consultant will be paid the total amount of its costs as of the termination date. In no event shall the amount payable upon termination exceed the total maximum compensation provided for in this Agreement.

6.2 Termination for Cause.

6.2.1 City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of 5116863.1-L235.0 270
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

this Agreement in any of the following circumstances:
a. If Consultant fails to perform the services required by this Agreement within the time specified herein or any authorized extension thereof, or b. If Consultant fails to perform the services called for by this Agreement or so fails to make progress as to endanger performance of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and in either of these circumstances does not correct such failure withing a period of ten (10) days (or such longer period as Citymay authorize inwriting) afterreceipt ofnotice from City specifying such failure.

6.2.2 In the event City terminates this Agreement in whole or in part as provided above in Subsection 6.2.1, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may deem appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

6.2.3 IfthisAgreementisterminatedasprovidedaboveinSubsection6.2.1,Citymay require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, photographs, reports, films, charts, sketches, computations, surveys, models, or other similar documentation prepared by Consultant. Upon such termination, Consultant shall be paid an amount equal to the value of the work performed. In ascertaining the value of the work performed up to the date of termination, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents whether delivered to City or in possession of Consultant, and to authorized reimbursement expenses.

6.2.4 If, after notice of termination of the Agreement under the provisions of Subsection 6.2.1 above, it is determined, for any reason, that Consultant was not in default, or that the default was excusable, then the rights and obligations of the Parties shall be the same as if the notice of termination had been issued pursuant to Subsection 6.1. above.

6.3 Non-Assignability. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the express prior written consent of City.

6.4 Non-Discrimination.

6.4.I Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of to race, creed, gender, gender identity (including gender expression), color, religion, ancestry, sexual orientation, national origin, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, or veteran/military status, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement and will comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of the federal, state, and county and the City governments. Consultant will take 5116863.1-L235.0
271
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, sex, national origin, disability, or age. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that all employment practices, including those of any subcontractors retained by Consultant to perform services under this Agreement, are free from such discrimination. Such employment practices include, but are limited to: hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay or other fon'ns of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

6.4.2 The provisions of Subsection 6.4.2 above shall be included in all solicitations or advertisements placed by or on behalf of Consultant for personnel to perfori'n any services under this Agreement. City shall have access to all documents, data, and records of Consultant and its subcontractors for purposes of determining compliance with the equal employment opportunity and non-discrimination provisions of this Section, and all applicable provisions of Executive Order No. 11246 (relating to federal restrictions against discriminatory practices) is available for review and on file with the City Clerk's Office.

6.5 Insurance. Consultant shall submit to City, certificates indicating compliance with the following minimum insurance requirements no less than one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement:

6.5.1 Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such workers' compensation insurance for their respective employees.

6.5.2 Comprehensive general and automobile liability insurance protecting Consultant in amounts not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/accident for bodily injury and property damage liability. Each such policy of insurance shall:
a. Be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California or which is approved in writing by City.
b. Name and list as additional insured the City, its officers and employees. c. Specify its acts as primary insurance.
d. Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy shall not be canceled except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City of such cancellation or material change."
5116863.1-L235.0 272
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

e. Cover the operations of Consultant pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

6.6 Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and/or any other City agency, including other employees, officers and representatives, for/from any and all claims or actions of any kind asserted against City and/or any other City agency arising out of Consultant's (including Consultant's employees, representatives, products and subcontractors) negligent performance under this Agreement, excepting only such claims or actions which may arise out of sole or active negligence of City and/or any other City agency, or any third parties not acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or under the control of Consultant.

6.7 Compliance with Applicable Law. Consultant and City shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of the Federal, State, County and City governrnents, without regard to conflict of law principles.

6.8 Independent Contractor. This Agreement is by and between City and Consultant and is not intended, nor shall it be construed, to create the relationship of agency, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association, as between City and Consultant.

6.8.1 Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall have no power to incur any debt or obligation for or on behalf of City. Neither City nor any of its officers or employees shall have any control over the conduct of Consultant, or any of Consultant's employees, except as herein set forth, and Consultant expressly warrants not to, at any time or in anymanner, represent that it, or any ofits agents, servants or employees are in any manner employees of City, it being distinctly understood that Consultant is and shall at all times remain to City a wholly independent contractor and Consultant's obligations to City are solely such as are prescribed by this Agreement.

6.8.2 Indemnification of CalPERS Determination - In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for CalPERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as, for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

6.8.3 Business License Required. According to Title 2.08.40 of the South Gate Municipal Code, a business license will be required prior to doing business within the City, even if the business is located outside of the City. Verification of a valid South Gate business license will be required prior to start of work and any fees associated with the acquisition or maintenance of such business license shall be 5116863.1-L235.0
273
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

the sole responsibility of Consultant.

6.9 Consultant's Personnel.

6.9.1 All services required under the Agreement will be perfon'ned by Consultant, or under Consultant's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits and licenses required by State and local law to perfornn such services, including, without limitation, a City of South Gate business license as required by the South Gate Municipal Code.

6.9.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing services required by this Agreement, and compliance with all reasonable performance standards established by City.

6.9.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance and Social Security.

6.9.4 Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and all other related entities, officers, employees and representatives from any liability, damages, claims, costs, and expenses of any nature arising from alleged violations of personnel practices or of any acts of omissions by Consultant in coru'iection with the work performed arising from this Agreement.

6.10 Copyright. No reports, maps or other documents produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Consultant.

6.11 Legal Construction.

6.11.1 This Agreement is made and entered into in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced, and governed under the laws of the State of California without regard to conflict of law principles.

6.11.2 This Agreement shall be construed without regard to the identity of the persons who drafted its various provisions. Each and every provision of this Agreement shall be construed as though each of the parties participated equally in the drafting of same, and any rule of construction that a document is to be construed against the drafting party shall not be applicable to this Agreement.

6.11.3. The article and section, captions and headings herein have been inserted for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of interpretation or construction.
5116863.1-L235.0
274
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

6.11.4. Whenever in this Agreement the context may so require, the masculine gender shall be deemed to refer to and include the feminine and neuter, and the singular shall refer to and include the plural.

6.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and, as so executed, shall constitute an agreement which shall be binding upon all Parties hereto.

6.13 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release. The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished, or relating to Consultant's work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City's check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim withinten(10)calendardaysofthereceiptofthatcheck. However,approvalorpayment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the work prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents.

6.14 Corrections. In addition to the above indeinnification obligations, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during City's review of Consultant's report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in a reasonably, timely manner, such correction shall be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant.

6.15 Files. All files of Consultant pertaining to City shall be and remain the property of City.

Consultant will control the physical location of such files during the term of this Agreement and shall be entitled to retain copies of such files upon termination of this Agreement.

6.16 Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by a Party to insist upon the performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, irrespective of the length of time for which such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party's right to demand compliance by such other Party in the future. No waiver by a Party of a default or breach of the other party shall be effective or binding upon such a Party unless made in writing by such Party, and no such waiver shall be implied from any omissions by a Party to take any action with respect to such default or breach. No express written waiver of a specified default or breach shall affect any other default or breach, or cover any other period of time, other than any default or breach and/or period of time specified. All of the remedies permitted or available to a Party under this Agreement, or at law or in equity, shall be cumulative and alternative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right of remedy.

R)
5116863.1-L235.0 275
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

6.17 Mitigation of Damages. In all such situations arising out of this Agreement, the Parties shall attempt to avoid and minimize the damages resulting from the conduct of the other Party.

6.18 Severability. If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

6.19 Attorneys' Fees. The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or coru'iected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any Party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that Party or those Parties may be entitled.

6.20 Entire Agreement and Amendments. This Agreement constitutes the whole agreement between City and Consultant, and neither party has made any representations to the other except as expressly contained herein. Neither party, in executing or performing this Agreement, is relying upon any statement or information not contained in this Agreement. Any amendments, changes ormodifications to this Agreementmust bemade in writing and appropriately executed by both City and Consultant.

6.21 Notices. Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be deemed to have been given by email transmission with confirmation of delivery and depositing said notice in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:

TO CITY:

City of South Gate
Arturo Cervantes, ACM/Director of Public Works
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Email: acervantes(,sogate.orz
WITH COURTESY COPY TO:

City of South Gate
Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Email: yglaze(,sogate.org
TO CONSULTANT:

John L. Hunter & Associates
John Hunter, President
6131 0rangethorpe Ave #300
Buena Park, CA 90620
E-mail: ihunter(2Ailha.net
5116863.1-L235.0 t'l 276
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

6.22 Warranty of Authorized Signatories. Each of the signatories hereto warrants and represents that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign.

6.23 Consultation with Attorney. Consultant warrants and represents that it has consulted with an attorney or knowingly and voluntarily decided to forgo such a consultation.

6.24 Interpretation Against Drafting Party. City and Consultant agree that they have cooperated in the review and drafting of this agreement. Accordingly, in the event of any ambiguity, neither Party may claim that the interpretation of this Agreement shall be construed against either Party solely because that Party drafted all or a portion of this Agreement, or the clause at issue.

7. CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. In accordance with California SB1439 extended requirements under Government Code Section 84308, also known as the "Levine Act," a disclosure must be filed of political contributions totaling more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) within the previous twelve (12) months, and for three (3) months following the date a final decision is made to award an agreement. Therefore, the City requires that Consultant fill out the California Levine Act Disclosure Statement form available on the City website and submit it to the City Clerk's Office prior to the approval of this Agreement.

8. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Agreement is July 22, 2025, and will remain in effect through and until project completion, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.J
Sl
5116863.1-L235.0 277
Agreement for Professional Services
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

By:

Maria Davila, Mayor
Dated:

ATTEST:

By:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Raul F. Salinas, City Attorney
JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.:

By:

Jillian Brickey, Project Manager
Dated:
5116863.1-L235.0
278
Exhibit "A"
@JLHA

MUNICIPALCONTRACTOR
June 9, 2025
City Clerk's Office
Attn: Arturo Cervantes, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works Public Works Department, Engineering Division
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Subject: Proposal for Professional Service for the Management of the Industrial Waste (IW) Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease (FOG) Control Program We at John L. Hunter and Associates (JLHA) welcome the opportunity to continue providing our professional consulting services to the City of South Gate, a partnership we've valued for 34 years. This proposal is prepared in response to the Request for Proposal for Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program.

Established in 1985, JLHA is an environmental consulting corporation specializing in assisting municipalities with water quality and conservation programs. Our extensive experience includes implementing state programs for NPDES water quality, sewer spill prevention (including SSMP implementation), IW and FOG Control, water conservation, and recycling. Detailed qualifications and experience are provided within this proposal package. The proposed Project Manager for this proposal is:

Jillian Brickey
[email protected] i 562.623.5081
The timeframe of this proposal is for a period of three (3) years. The services may be extended for two (2) additional one-year terms, upon written agreement by the City and JLHA. This proposal is considered valid for at least ninety (90) calendar days from the date of submittal.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any furtherinformation or have any questions.

Sincerely,
'e' r ?':!? '
Director
279
Professional Service for the Management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program

MUNI CTOR
DATE OF PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL: 2025.06.09
Prepared for: (,ity (,lerk's Office
Attn: Arturo (,ervantes
Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
(,ity of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Prepared by: John L. Hunter & Associates
6131 €rangethorpe Ave #30€
Buena Park, CA 9062€
Jillian Brickey John Hunter
Project Manager
[email protected]
562.623.5€81
Principal-in-Charge
[email protected]
310344.8650
l'7 280
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Table of Contents

1. Qualifications and Experience.

1.1. Firm Profile.

1.2. Relevant Firm Experience

1.3. Program Manager.

1.4. Key Personnel.

1.5. Similar Projects.

1.6. Firm's Quality Assurance/Control Procedures

2. Qualifications and Experience.

2.1. Firm's Understanding and Approach.

2.2. Preliminary Project Schedule

3. References

4. Resource Allocation Matrix.

Appendix A: Resumes
.1
.1
1 .1
.3
.4
5 .6
6 .11
.13
. 13
.A1
Page
'l(, 281
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025

1. Qualifications and Experience

1.1. Firm Profile
John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc. (JLHA) is an environmental consulting corporation founded in 1985. We have been in business for 40 years. We specialize in assisting municipalities implement water quality and conservation programs. We currently implement elements of these programs to over 40 local municipalities. Specific programs we assist with include IW and FOG Control, NPDES, sewer blockage and spill prevention (including SSMP implementation), stormwater pollution prevention, watershed management, water conservation, and recycling. Services include program administration, planning, reporting, and funding, as well as inspections, engineering, monitoring, public education, and training.

1.2. Relevant Firm Experience
Our firm has been providing IW and FOG Control services to municipal clients since its incorporation in 1985. Prior to the State Water Board's 2006 Waste Discharge Requirements Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems (555 WDRI FOG control was addressed under the broad scope of a City's IW Control Program, which was adopted to protect local sewer systems. Since 2006, JLHA has expanded the FOG element of its IW Control Programs to address the 555 WDR, including Food Service Establishment permitting, FOG-oriented inspections and education, hot spot identification and facility prioritization. Table 1 of this proposal includes a complete list of the IW and FOG Control services we provide to current municipal clients, as well as our years of service. These services are similar to those listed in the RFP.

We have also assisted six cities update their SSMPs (including Spill Emergency Response Plans formerly OERPs), and prepare the internal audit required by the State Water Resources Control Board's Statewide Sanitary Sewer Systems General Order 2022-0103-DWQ (the General Order).

It is worth noting that two JLHA FOG clients in the LA area-South Pasadena and Manhattan Beach-have received Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) program audits by the Los Angeles Regional Water Board. These audits address all elements of an Enrollee's SSMP Program, including FOG control source. In both instances no deficiencies were noted in the FOG Control Program.

1.3. Program Manager
The person who will serve as the Project Manager and the day-to-day point of contact for the City is:

Jillian Brickey
[email protected] l 562.623.5081
Jillian Brickey has 19 years of experience managing municipal environmental programs, including experience in dealing with Public Agency Staff, Council, and Commissions.

Pagel
'rl 282
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Table 1. Municipal IW and FOG Control Clients and Services l!-
-
: ff i W'ah'-
" ' l""=-'-.-'."'-.,'.,."':'v"l..=':',"':"""""ZII'J'7St!-[[ [[: ml il 5 f Em fat!lalffalfl i
Arcadia:30 Hawthorne: 17 Manhattan Beach:15 Signal Hill:40 South Pasadena: 15 Covina: 10 Hermosa Beach:5 Monterey Park: 5 South EI Monte: 28 Stanton: 18 EI Monte:9 Inglewood: 10 RanchoPalosVemes:15 South Gate: 34 Whittier: 10 [ffl
ih -'m-ai i*m- c J)I 44 _-% % ' - 0 aaja% - } J ' a-,,,'a"l ': _-' i - "- o ,s a__:' -"- : t JE : j-i il%aE Category Briejdescription iCitiesserved
Program administration

1. Administrative support Program oversight, City representation, and/or technical and regulatory support 11

2. Inspections IW/FOG best management practices and pretreatment maintenance inspections 15

3.Permitting lndustrialWasteControlpermitprocessing 9

4. Plan review Clarifier and grease trap/interceptor review 7 -.m:iwiai-i- -a:nu<aaaxmum:i-iir*izi-aib*azmiumu--ant-it-a-u+ai i i } #l #a0{00 l asias - -Jl ffi-=- --=---==--- = - ----==-= - ---=------.-.-...-......_l....-..-..... -.__._l_...'l I i .._..._ €
m ' a; A M
%s.,%,'a _' .,' A,a! ,,'l . ,, x,-Y,7's,-,_-it,-,l,s,,%Js%,o"a'o-,JY.,t(,,""b,taasI,%y"L.'4a;i:)all't;g;g! g a u! Umffl mffi#4W t. '. ._a } 0 . 1. tia*a._ 04 0. l('_l - 4 .. -lll+l0 _ =srjmatt.(.a " 4. 5 %. a-J M & J...+_nlu 0 <:ki ._ ;'A Oaut :_a.W atmW JL !_ae#.M.{V*ig<taa Cities with all or most serviceis pr6vided (11)
All services: Arcadia, El Monte, Monterey Park, Signal Hill, South EI Monte, South Gate, Stanton. All services except #3: South Pasadena. All services except #4: Covina, Hawthorne. All services except #3 and #4: Rancho Palos Verdes. ,, , , . . } _, - -. , ,. , I _ l . - _= . . %. -l 0 . ' ii_ (( -.! l-& R%i. ' .} . 1. .}Y ha A.!('i 'J ' -(: a"" * s }iai-+ (i-a ' _ ' i -( _ '}" Cities Wtth select services provided as labeled (4) Hermosa Beach (3), Inglewood (3i Manhattan Beach (3), Whittier i3) Page2
l!) 283
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025

1.4. Key Personnel
Table 2 lists the key personnel for this project and their typical project roles. Resumes are included in Appendix A listing applicable certifications and/or licenses held by the proposed team. The Project Manager and key staff will be available to the extent proposed for the duration of the required services. No person designated as "key" shall be removed or replaced without the proper written concurrence of the City of South Gate.

Table 2. Key Project Team Personnel and Roles
Program Title Team Member Information
Project Mgr./
Main Point of
Contact
Name Jillian Brickey, MS, CPSWQ, QSD/P, CGP ToR
Roles POC, leads project team, oversees budget and schedule Workload 8% of current staff workload committed to this project Principal/
Alt. Point of
Contact
Name John Hunter, PE
Roles POC, provides as-needed technical a'ssistance and project oversight.

Workload 2% of current staff workload committed to this project Project Lead
Name Hugo Garcia, CPSWQ, CESSWI, QSD/P
Roles POC, leads implementation of services, provides technical assistance.

Workload 25% of current staff workload committed to this project Project
Support
Name Cameron McCullough, MS, CPSWQ QSD/P, IGP ToR
Roles Provides as-needed technical assistance.

Workload 2% of current staff workload committed to this project Sr Compliance
Specialist
Name Wilson Duong, CPSWQ, CESSWI, QSD/P
Roles ASSiStS in implementing and leading field services.

Workload 4% of current staff workload committed to this project Sr Compliance
Specialist
Name Glenn Cajar, CPESC, CESSWI, QSP, QISP
Roles ASSiStS in implementing and leading field services.

Workload 4% of current staff workload committed to this project Inspector II
Name Brandon LaBeet, QISP
Roles Field compliance inspections
Workload 27% of current staff workload committed to this project Inspector II
Name Erick Barrales, CESSWI, QSP, QISP
Roles Field compliance inspections
Workload 27% of current staff workload committed to this project Staff Engineer
Name Chris Chew, PE, QSD/P
Roles Oversees plan review and engineering.

Workload 1% of current staff workload committed to this project Page3
(o\ 284
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025

1.5. Similar Projects
Table 3 is a brief list of current relevant projects in the southern California region that are similar to the RFP Scope of Work. Details of the specific services we provide to current municipal clients, along with our years or service, can be found in Section 1.2 of this proposal.

Table 3. Comparable Work
Agency Name
RFP Taskl
1 2 3
Arcadia x x x
Covina x x x
EI Monte x x x
Hawthorne x x x
Hermosa Beach x
Inglewood x
Manhattan Beach x
Monterey Park x x x
Rancho Palos Verdes x x x
Signal Hill x x x
South EI Monte x x x
South Gate x x x
South Pasadena x x x
Stanton x x x
Whittier x
TOTAL 13 15 13
' Task 1- Program Management, Task 2-Inspections and Enforcement, Task 3 - Outreach Page4
285
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025

1.6. Firm's Quality Assurance/Control Procedures
Our approach to the management and implementation of our IW/FOG Control services is to ensure we are providing responsive, high-quality services that are tailored to the needs and interests of our clients. From there, our focus is 1) determining what is needed to ensure our clients" continued IW/FOG Control compliance, and then 2) assisting our clients in implementing cost-effective solutions to meet or exceed compliance expectations.

Our team is led by a Project Manager. The Project Manager ensures services are provided on time, within the budget, and are of high quality, and also serves as the main point-of-contact.

The team is organized so there is more than one expert ("lead") for any task listed in the City's RFP, and that more than one team member can serve as a point-of contact. This "good" redundancy helps ensure that all services are provided on time, within the budget, and are of high quality. Our team also incorporates multiple levels of review of project deliverables by qualified team members. This is done to provide an unbiased assessment of our accuracy, completeness, and adherence to regulations and best practices. For example, the Project Manager will review and provide internal comment on compliance reports prepared by a Team Lead. Both team members have extensive experience preparing these reports. Another example is that our Senior field staff review field inspection reports, have inspectors correct reports when necessary, and summarize the results to the Project Manager.

The Program Manager and senior staff meet weekly with program team members to discuss program budgets, services provided, and the quality of work. These meetings serve to both assure continued quality and resolve any issues that may affect the quality of work. We have also developed applications to streamline and improve the QA/QC process, which optimizes quality of work while minimizing the QA/QC expense.

We have an extensive training program for our personnel. All new personnel are trained generally in our company"s approach as well as specifically in the proper implementation of the IW/FOG Control services they will provide. Training is conducted by managers and senior staff and continues on a regular basis for years. It includes both hands-on training in the field and in the office. Managers and senior staff also meet with personnel on a weekly basis to continue their education and to review work conducted in the prior week.

The services we provide are on an annual basis, with many annual deadlines for tasks such as compliance reports, and field inspections. We have a proven track record of providing similar services to your city-as well as our many other municipal clients-for years without missing these deadlines, and we are confident we will continue to meet them in the coming years. Our team also has depth of experience in this work, with multiple team members independently capable of providing multiple tasks. This provides additional assurance that all tasks will be completed on schedule.

Page5
286
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 2, Qualifications and Experience

2.1. Firm's Understanding and Approach
Table 41ists the services listed on Page 6 of the RFP, and include information that describes the scope of work and approach for completing the scope. These services will include:
* Keeping the City informed by providing quarterly reporting. * Demonstrating the overall capabilities of the firm in terms of personnel and technological resources.
* Ensuring the ability to meet deadlines.

Table 4. Approach to IW Program and FOG Program Services RFP Task Description
1 Program Management

1.1 The Consultant shall provide a Project Manager to be responsible for the successful delivery a high-quality product within budget and on schedule.

Jillian Brickey will serve as the Project Manager for this project. Jillian will lead the project team, ensure services are provided on time, within the budget, and are of high quality, and also serves as the main point-of-contact. The team is organized so there is more than one expert ("lead") for any task listed in the City's RFP, and that more than one team member can serve as a point-of contact. John Hunter will provide as-needed technical assistance and project oversight, and serve as the alternate point-of-contact. This "good" redundancy helps ensure that all services will be provided on time, within the budget, and are of high quality.

1.2 The Consultant shall be responsible for project management activities throughout the life of the contract including managing the schedule and budget, setting up meetings and field reviews, and managing the team.

Our approach is to: incorporate multiple levels of review of project deliverables by qualified team members. This is done to provide an unbiased assessment of our accuracy, completeness, and adherence to regulations and best practices. For example, the Project Manager will review and provide internal comment on compliance reports prepared by the Principal or Project Lead. These team members have extensive experience preparing these reports. Another example is that our Senior field staff review field inspection reports, have inspectors correct reports when necessary, and summarize the results to the Project Manager. The Program Manager and senior staff also meet weekly with program team members to discuss program budgets, services provided, and the quality of work. These meetings serve to both assure continued quality and resolve any issues that may affect the quality of work.

The Consultant shall plan and organize a project kick-off meeting to discuss the goals, objectives, tasks, timeline, and the city"s expectations. The Project kick-off meeting shall outline the plan for completing all tasks. The Consultant will be responsible for Page6
'Ll 287
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Table 4. Approach to IW Program and FOG Program Services RFP Task Description
preparing the meeting agenda and minutes for the kick-off meeting as well as all meetings to be conducted for this program.

We will be available to plan and organize a project kick-off meeting within One week of receiving a notice proceed.

1.4 The Consultant shall meet quarterly with the City to discuss the program, monitor project progress, prepare for upcoming tasks, debrief on completed asks. With advance approval from City staff, some meetings may be virtual. When virtual meetings are held, all participants must have their cameras turned on.

We will meet quarterly with the City to discuss the program, monitor project progress, prepare for upcoming tasks, and debrief on completed tasks. Meeting summaries will be prepared for City review. Any action items required by the City as a result of the meetings will be conveyed via email or phone call. 2 Inspections and Enforcement

2.1 Conduct Industrial Waste inspections on commercial and industrial business as required by local, State and Federal laws.

We provide this service to 15 clients in Los Angeles and Orange County. Our approach is to: inspect IW/FOG Control permittees under the City's IW Program annually to verify conformance with the City's Ordinance (Chapter 6.62 - Sanitary Sewers and Industrial Waste}. These compliance inspections focus on employee education as well as verification of proper source control BMPs, clarifier and grease trap/interceptor maintenance. An inspection report will be completed and provided to the IW/FOG Control contact at the end of the inspec'?on. If corrections are required, the inspector will list them in the inspection report. The time frame of the follow-up will depend on the severity of the violation, and generally range from same-day to two weeks. Some common issues can be addressed via email, fax, or phone, such as the need to provide updated yellow grease hauling/interceptor pump-out records. Some violations may take additional time to resolve.

2.2 Conduct necessary follow-up site inspections as require Our approach is to: conduct follow-up inspections at noncompliant facilities. The time frame of the follow-up will depend on the severity of the violation, and generally range from same-day to two weeks. Some common issues can be addressed via email, fax, or phone, such as the need to provide updated yellow grease hauling/interceptor pump-out records. Some violations may take additional time to resolve.

2.3 Enforce City Municipal Code Chapter 6.62 - Industrial Waste If repeated or egregious code violations are noted, our approach is to notify City staff to resolve the issue. This may include working with City Code Enforcement to issue citations, or to require the installation of a clarifier or grease trap/interceptor.

Evaluate and process Industrial Waste Reports to ensure compliance.

Page7
23 288
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Table 4. Approach to IW Program and FOG Program Services RFP Task Description
I
Our approach is to: store all service-related documents on a secured Goo@le Drive account and all inspection-related records on a secured Google Cloud account using a dedicated and customized application driven by Google's AppSheet. All records will be secured and accessible to City staff online. All records are accessible to City staff online and inspection reports and lists will be provided monthly and upon demand.

Reports and lists are available in any format requested by the City, such as PDF and XLSX. Should the City have an online IW/FOG Control database management system, we will use the system for record keeping.

2.5 I
Review and approve developer plans for pretreatment processes, provide comments on proposed projects applications, review and approve technical specifications for pretreatment process. (estimated 20 plans review annually) We provide this service to 7 clients in Los Angeles and Orange County. Our approach is to: 1) review plans/drawings of new or existing IW/FOG Control facilities undergoing remodeling, 2) verify conformance with the City's IW clarifier and FOG Control grease trap/interceptor requirements, 3) provide correction sheets to indicate corrections required to achieve conformance, 4) meet and correspond with project applicants and engineers, and 5) approve the plans. The proposed projects application and any associated plans and supporting information will be reviewed for: Discharge rates into the sewe5 pretreatment retention times and capacity, and types of materials being discharged. Standard turn-around time for review is two weeks (ten working days). However, we are available to expedite reviews (at the request of the City).

2.6 Conduct inspections on new developments and existing businesses as necessary by the state requirements
We will conduct inspections on new developments upon receiving notice from the city to inspect. Our approach: to this task will follow those listed in RFP Tasks 2.1 to

2.3. Note, new developments will not be inspected until the facility has received their Certificate of Occupancy and has been operating for at least three months.

2.7 Complete and submit required regulatory reports as outline by the State.

Our approach is to: assist the City with other required regulatory reports upon receiving notice from the city to proceed and availability of records. This mayinclude reviewin@ the current SSMP and related documents (e.g., Spill Emergency Response Plan formerly OERP, spill reports, etc.), and comparing it against the updated required elements specified in Attachment D of the State Water Resources Control Board's Statewide Sanitary Sewer Systems General Order 2022-0103-DWQ. This may also include FOG investigations and preparing reports, both conducted as a result of Category I sanitary sewer overflows. Although it is not required to submit routine IW/FOG Control inspection reports to the State, they still may be requested for program compliance purposes. All IW/FOG Control records are stored, as referenced in RFP Task 2.4, and can be provided to the city or regulators immediately upon req uest.

Page8
289
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Table 4. Approach to IW Program and FOG Program Services RFP Task Description

2.8 ASSiSt the City with Annual Billing
We provide this service to 8 clients in Los Angeles and Orange County. We understand the City's Finance Department prepares the Annual Billing. Our approach is to: provide a spreadsheet of the sites inspected within the fiscal year and their assigned tiered schedule.

2.9 Implement Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) Procedures Service quality is ensured through a QA/QC budget assigned to the program. This budget (approximately 5% of total program costs) is for time spent by supervising key personnel to regularly review the Project Team"s work product. This time is also used to track and control the budget, and to ensure control of the schedule of services provided as listed in the following subsections.

2.10 Review and evaluate Self-Monitoring Reports (SMRs) from permitted users to ensure compliance.

It is our understanding that SMRs are a type of report required from industrial wastewater dischargers by the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. Our approach is to: request these reports from the City or County, upon receiving notice from the city to review and evaluate. Should the review indicate the need for inspection and enforcement, our response will follow those listed in RFP Tasks 2.1 to

2.3. 2.11 Prepare and complete all required regulatory reports as required by the Wastewater Discharge Requirements (WDR).

Although it is not required to submit routine IW/FOG Control inspection reports to the State, they still may be requested for program compliance purposes. All IW/FOG Control records are stored, as referenced in RFP Task 2.4, and can be provided to the city or regulators immediately upon request.

2.12 Conduct necessary follow-up site inspections for new or tenant improvement projects that require Program involvement.

Our approach: to this task will follow those listed in RFP Tasks 2.2 and 2.3

2.13 Provide monthly status reports to the City and attend any meetings required to maintain effective communications.

We will update City staff each month on the status of program compliance. This may include providing information on any revisions to the FOG element of State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ or LA County Municipal Code Title 20 section; summarizing Order and County workshops and meetings held by the Water Board or County; and keeping the City apprised of recent Water Board and County enforcement actions.

We also understand that our clients prefer updates and reports that are clear, concise, and focused on action items and key points. In addition to written updates Page9
290
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Table 4. Approach to IW Program and FOG Program Services RFP Task Description
and reports, we can provide this service through in-person meetings, video conferences, phone calls, emails, and texting.
3 Outreach

3.1 Develop an informative model that educates the public about the Industrial Waste Program and FOG Control Program
We provide this service to 13 clients in Los Angeles and Orange County. Through this work we prepared multi-lingual press releases, materials, and content that address the IW/FOG Control Program. These materials will be available to the city. Our approach is to develop public ocitreach/education at the City's request which can be made in multiple languages, including Spanish and Chinese. We can also provide updates to the City's website, addressing new topics as needed such as the State Water Resources Control Board's Statewide Sanitary Sewer Systems General Order 2022-0103-DWQ requirements. Additional types of materials and content provided upon request include but are not limited to brochures, posters, articles, social media posts, and websites. We can modify our existing materials for City distribution, or we can develop new materials at the request of the City.

3.2 Attend a minimum of three local City/Community events to promote the program We will discuss with City staff opportunities to participate and promote nearby events such as Earth Day, or other city events. We will attend the chosen event(s) and educate the public in IW/FOG Control through discussion, demonstrations, and material distribution.

P a g e 10
291
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025

2.2. Preliminary Project Sc}iedule
Table 5 demonstrates an annual timeline of the completion for the tasks listed in the scope of services. Services listed in the scope of services that are not shown on the timeline are on-going services, or are as-needed, and therefore do not have a distinguished deadline.

Table 5. Service Deliverable Schedule
RFP
Task
Deliverable by task Delivery date and/or frequency
1 Program Management

1.3 The Consultant shall plan and organize a
project kick-off meeting to discuss the
goals, objectives, tasks, timeline, and the
city's expectations. The Project kick-off
meeting shall outline the plan for
completing all tasks. The Consultant will be
responsible for preparing the meeting
agenda and minutes for the kick-off
meeting as well as all meetings to be
conducted for this program.

Within one week of receiving a notice to
proceed.

1.4 The Consultant shall meet quarterly with
the City to discciss the program, monitor
project progress, prepare for upcoming
tasks, debrief on completed asks. With
advance approval from City staff, some
meetings may be virtual. When virtual
meetings are held, all participants must
have their cameras turned on.

Quarterly.
2 Inspections and Enforcement

2.1 Conduct Industrial Waste inspections on
commercial and industrial business as
required by local, State and Federal laws.

Annually (minimum). Note, existing
facilities are inspected based on the tiered
schedule (e.g., A = anncially, B =
semiannually, C = every 4 months, D =
quarterly, E = every 2 months) as set by
the adopted LA County Municipal Code
Title 20 section.

2.2 Conduct necessary follow-up site
inspections as require
<_ 4 weeks from last inspection.
<_ 2 weeks from receivin@ plans. Note,
standard turn-around time for FOG plan
review is two weeks and expedited plan
review is seven days.

P a g e 11
292
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Table 5. Service Deliverable Schedule
RFP
Task
Deliverable by task Delivery date and/orfrequency
specifications for pretreatment process.
(estimated 20 plans review annually)

2.6 Conduct inspections on new developments
and existing businesses as necessary bythe
state requirements
Upon receiving notice from the city to
inspect. Note, new developments will not
be inspected until the facility has received
their Certificate of Occupancy and has
been operating for at least three months.

2.7 Complete and submit required regulatory
reports as outline by the State.

Date set by City and JLHA at time of
request.

2.8 ASSiSt the City with Annual Billing
Date set by City and JLHA at time of
request.

2.10 Review and evaluate Self-Monitoring
Reports (SMRs) from permitted users to
ensure compliance.

Date set by City and JLHA at time of
request.

2.11 Prepare and complete all required
regulatory reports as required by the
Wastewater Discharge Requirements
(WDR).

Date set by City and JLHA at time of
request.

2.13 Provide monthly status reports to the City
and attend any meetings required to
maintain effective communications.

Reports: At least monthly. Meetings: Date
set by City and JLHA at time of request.
3 Outreach

3.1 Develop an informative model that
educates the public about the Industrial
Waste Program and FOG Control Program
Date set by City and JLHA at time of
request.

3.2 Attend a minimum of three local
City/Community events to promote the
program
Date set by City and JLHA at time of
request.

P a g e 12
293
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025

3. References
Table 6 is a list of client references we have provided similar scope of services. Additional references are available at the request of the City.

Table 6. References
Agency Name Data Field Reference Information
South EI Monte
Client Contact7Title Rene Salas, City Manager
Address 1415 N Santa Anita Ave, South EI Monte, CA 91733 Email/Telephone [email protected], 626.579.6540 Ext. 3040 Sta nton
Client Contact/Title Cesar Rangel, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Address 7800 Katella Ave, Stanton, CA 90680
Email/Telephone [email protected], 714.890.4203
Monterey Park
Client Contact/Title Ziad Mazboudi, Engineering Manager Address 320 W Newmark Ave, Monterey Park, CA 91754
Email/Telephone [email protected], 626.532.2018 Arcadia
Client Contact/Title Briget Arndell, Environmental Services Manager Address 11800 Goldring Rd, Arcadia, 91066
Email/Telephone [email protected], 626.254.2705
Pasadena
Client Contact/Title Dawn Petschauer, Stormwater Program Administrator Address 100 N Garfield Ave, Pasadena, CA 91101
Email/Telephone [email protected], 626.744.3929 Whittier
Client Contact/Title Kyle Cason, Director of Public Works Address 13230 Penn St, Whittier, CA 90602
Email/Telephone [email protected], 562.567.9500

4. Resource Allocation Matrix
Table 7 is a resource allocation matrix for the RFP Scope of Work.

P a g e 13
lol 294
Table 7. Resource Allocation Matri::

Taskname IRole ILevelofEffort Equipment/Software (if applicable) 1- Program Management
1 Project Manager 4 hrs/year Computer, phone, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 2 Project Manager 12 hrs/year Computer, phone, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 3 Prolect Manager 2 hrs/year Computer, phone, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 4 Project Manager 4 hrs/year Computer, phone, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 2 - Inspections and Enforcement
1 Compliance Specialist I 357 hrs/year Vehicle, PPE, phone, tablet, AppSheet software 2 Compliance Specialist I 36 hrs/year Vehicle, PPE, phone, tablet, AppSheet software 3 Compliance Specialist I Included with Task 2.1 Vehicle, PPE, phone, tablet, AppSheet software 4 Compliance Specialist I Included with Task 2.1 Vehicle, PPE, phone, tablet, AppSheet software 5 Assistant Project Manager 12 hrs/year Computer, phone, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 6 Compliance Specialist I 6 hrs/year Vehicle, PPE, phone, tablet, AppSheet software 7 Assistant Project Manager 2 hrs/year Computer, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 8 Assistant Project Manager 4 hrs/year Computer, Microsoft Office software 9 Senior Compliance Specialist Included with Task 2.1 Computer, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 10 Assistant Project Manager 2 hrs/year Computer, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 11 Assistant Prolect Manager 2 hrs/year Computer, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 12 Compliance SpecialistI Included with Task 2.6 Vehicle, PPE, phone, tablet, AppSheet software 13 Assistant Project Manager 6 hrs/year Computer, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 3 - Outreach
1 Assistant Project Manager 6 hrs/year Computer, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 2 Project Manager 8 hrs/year Computer, phone, Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office software 295
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 19 Years of Experience in Water Quality
Education
M.S., Environmental Science, CSUF
B.S., Zoology, Cal State Poly Pomona
Certifications
CPSWQ, EnviroCert (#0845)
QSD/QSP, CASQA (#22731)
CGP Trainer of Record, CASQA
Jillian Brickey, MS, CPSWQ, QSD/P, CGP ToR
Project Manager
Jillian Brickey has 19 years of experience in environmental management, specializing in wastewater, stormwater, watershed management, and water conservation. Her relevant experiences include implementing and managing municipal sewer spill, ndustrial Waste (IW), and FOG control programs, as well as NPDES Municipal Permit programs for Low Impact Development, Development Construction, and TMDL/watershed management.

Tasks include includes plan review and approval, reporting, training municipal staffin program implementation, and representing client interests in interactions with regulators and other stakeholders.

Recent Experience and Project Qualifications
Municipal Manazement: Ms. Brickey serves as a Programs Manager of municipal IW, FOG, and NPDES Permit programs for multiple cities throughout the Southland. Programs administered include non-stormwater discharge orders and permits (e.g., sanitary sewer overflow and NPDES), and TMDL implementation for water bodies impaired by trash, metals, toxics, and bacteria. Through these management activities, she has:

Managed municipal IW and FOG Control Programs. (Covina, Pasadena, Whittier).

Assisted managing municipal IW and FOG Control Programs. (South Gate, Stanton).

Represented cities in MS4 NPDES Permit New Development compliance audits from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. (Seal Beach: 2010, 2015, South Gate: 2024, Stanton: 2010).

Developed TMDL compliance plans for Metals, Toxics, Bacteria, and Trash. (Lower Los Angeles River, Lower San Gabriel River, Long Beach Nearshore Watersheds: 2013-2016.) Served as primary contact with clients and represented their interests when interacting with regulators. (Covina, La Habra, Seal Beach, South Pasadena, Stanton, Pasadena, West Hollywood).

Developed Stormwater Quality Management Programs (Seal Beach: 2011), LID compliance guideline documents (Gateway cities, 2014), and LID ordinances (2014).

Held CGP QSD/QSP training as a CGP ToR (Pasadena, 2016) and led over one hundred municipal training sessions in MS4 and CGP Permits. (Over 20 municipal clients: 2008-2016).

Reviewed on behalf of municipal clients hundreds of LID Plans, WQMPs, and SWPPPs and verified proper installation and maintenance of hundreds of LID BMPs.

Supervised JLHA plan checking staff.

Watershed Management: Ms. Brickey served as a Project Manager for the development of the WMPs for the Lower Los Angeles River and Lower San Gabriel River Watershed Groups (2013-2016). The WMPs were developed by MS4 Permittees with shared watershed boundaries, with the objective of achieving surface water quality standards. Tasks included evaluating existing control measures and developing new control measures and compliance schedules to achieve water quality standards. She also oversaw the development and implementation of LID ordinances as required by the WMP development process. This included preparing a LID Ordinance Equivalency Demonstration for the City of Long Beach.

She has also led multi-jurisdictional workshops and technical committees on watershed management program implementation, and engaged with Regional Water Quality Control Board members, staff, and non-governmenta organizations in support of contested issues regarding the watershed management compliance approach. Through representation of municipal clients' stakeholder interests, Ms. Brickey has also participated in the development of watershed management programs and monitoring programs for the Upper Los Angeles River, Upper San Gabriel River, and Peninsula Cities Watershed Groups (2013-present).

PageA2
296
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Over 30 years of project experience John L. Hunter, PE Priricipal
Certifications and Licenses
CA Professional Chemical Engineer, 4724
CA Registered Environmental Assessor, 0900
CA Hazardous Substance Removal, A3382
CA General Engineering License, A-582340
Education
B.S. Chemical Engineering, CSULB
B.S. Biological Sciences, UCI
Mr. Hunter serves as the Principal of JLHA. He has over 30 years of experience in municipal environmental programs and currently oversees or otherwise assists with: (1) elements of over 40 separate municipal NPDES programs that covers sub-programs such as: watershed and
stormwater management, TMDL implementation, plan
reviews, industrial and construction inspections, training, O&M activities, public outreach, and monitoring and reporting; (2) elements of 30 municipal Safe, Clean Water Programs, (3) eleven municipal FOG or Industrial Waste programs encompassing permitting, inspections and enforcement; (4) six municipal Used Oil Recycling programs; (5) three municipal Beverage Container Recycling programs; and (6) two water conservation programs.

Related Experience
Representation, Advocacy, and Leadership
Since May 2016, Mr. Hunter has served as the chair for the LA Permit Group, which facilitates discussions and provides area wide Permit updates to affected parties within LA County that are under the Regional MS4 NPDES Permit. He coordinates this role with staff from the County of Los Angeles, as well as other Permit stakeholders.

Historically, he has also chaired the Los Angeles River Watershed Management Committee and the Santa Monica Bay Bacterial TM DL J7 Subcommittee.

For decades Mr. Hunter has regularly represented client interests in meetings with Regional Board staff and members, most recently regarding topics such WMPs, CIMPs, TMDLs, trash provisions, and other new Permit mandates. Most recently this included providing written and oral comments on the 2021 Regional MS4 NPDES Permit on behalf of the Lower San Gabriel River and Lower LA River Watershed Management Groups.

Through these experiences, Mr. Hunter has played a leadership role in the continued countywide development and implementation of the Municipal NPDES Program in the LA Region.

Watershed Manazement and Safe, Clean Water Prozram
Mr. Hunter serves as the Principal-in-Charge for contracted program administration and implementation assistance to the Lower Los Angeles River Watershed Group, the Lower San Gabriel River Watershed Group, the Peninsula Cities Watershed Group, and the Long Beach Near-shore watersheds. Services overseen include preparation and adaptive management of the WMPs, CIMP monitoring, annual compliance reporting, project concept planning, and SCWP application preparation. This includes presenting SCWP funding projects to the Watershed Area Steering Committees (WASCs). He also participates as needed in the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Group, the Dominguez Channel Watershed Group, and the Los Cerritos Channel Watershed Group.

Total Maximum Daily Loads and NPDES Permit Implementation Mr. Hunter oversaw development of the Reach 1 Metals TMDL Implementation Plan on behalf of nine local agencies. The Plan was used as a source document for the Compliance Schedule in the Lower LA River WMP.

He has also administered Trash TMDL studies and associated compliance reports for 19 cities, and continues to oversee the development and implementation of the federally required NPDES Municipal Permit Minimum Control Measures for over 30 cities.

PageA3
297
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Education
B.S., Environmental Science, UCR
Certifications and Training
CPSWQ, EnviroCert (#1183)
CESSWI, EnviroCert (#4769)
Professiona Certificate in GIS
Basic Inspector Academy, Cal EPA
Spanish fluency
Hugo Garcia, CPSWQ, CESSWI, QSD/P
Assistant Project Manager
Hugo Garcia has 13 years of experience with John L. Hunter & Associates, specializing in NPDES and Industrial Waste/FOG Control regulations. His experiences include implementation of Municipal NPDES Programs for Industrial/Commercial Facilities, Development Construction, Municipal Activities, Planning and Land Development, Public Information and Participation, and Illicit Connections & Illicit Discharge Elimination Programs. In addition, Hugo provides TMDL implementation and reporting, and serves as JLHA's lead GIS Specialist.

Recent Experience and Project Qualifications
Mr. Garcia currently serves as both a Senior Project Analyst and Compliance Specialist whose responsibilities include providing assistance with the implementation of several Watershed Management Programs in Los Angeles and Orange County, as well as conducting stormwater compliance inspections (e.g., La Habra, and South Gate). Specific examples of recent experience and project qualifications include:

Assisting with the development, implementation, and compliance reporting components of Trash TMDLs for the Cities of Alhambra, Arcadia, Burbank, Downey, Glendale, Inglewood, Long Beach, Lomita, Lynwood, Monterey Park, Paramount, Pasadena, Pico Rivera, Rancho Palos Verdes, Signal Hill, South EI Monte, South Gate, South Pasadena, Temple City, and West Hollywood.

Assisting with the development of the Lower Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group Trash Monitoring Reporting Plan (TMRP), Trash Minimum Frequency of Assessment and Collection (MFAC/BMP) Programs for the Cities of Arcadia, Burbank, Downey, Glendale, Long Beach, Pasadena, and Pico Rivera, and Plastic Pellet Management Programs (PMRPs) for the Cities of Arcadia, Burbank, Glendale, Monterey Park, Pasadena, San Gabriel, South EI Monte, South Pasadena, and Temple City.

Assisting with Industrial General NPDES Stormwater Permit compliance activities and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) for municipal facilities located in the Cities of Laguna Beach, La Mirada, San Gabriel, Signal Hill, and West Covina.
ii Conducting over 3,000 NPDES compliance inspections at industrial/commercial facilities (e.g., food facilities, automotive repair facilities, and facilities subject to the Industrial General Permit) and construction sites.

Developing and maintaining GIS databases of 1) potential sites for low impact development (LID) retrofit projects to comply with various Watershed Management Programs, 2) catch basin retrofit locations to comply with Trash TMDLs and the statewide Trash Provisions, and 3) MS4 outfall and non- stormwater discharges locations to comply with Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Programs (CIMPS).

Reviewing preliminary plumbing plans for new development and tenant improvement projects at Industrial Waste/FOG facilities in the cities of Arcadia, Signal Hill, South EI Monte, South Gate, and Stanton.

Assisting with the review of small site Low Impact Development (LID) plans for conformance with city- specific LID standards for the Cities of Signal Hill, South Gate, and West Hollywood.

Developing retrofit opportunity inventories for multi-watershed/multi-jurisdictional grants.

PageA4
298
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 21 years of project experience
Education
M.S., Applied Mathematics, CSULB
B.S., Physics, CSULB
Certifications
CPSWQ, EnviroCert (#0842)
QSD/QSP, CASQA (#22706)
IGP Trainer of Record, CASQA (#079)
Affiliations
Cameron McCullough, CPSWQ, QSD/P, IGP ToR
Director
Cameron McCullough has 21 years of experience in the environmental compliance field, specializing in municipal surface water quality. His experience includes municipal 550 control, NPDES, and TMDL programs administration and implementation, funding-including the Safe, Clean Water Program, compliance planning, staff training, and representing client interests in interactions with regulators and other stakeholders.

Phi Beta Kappa Society
Society for Industrial & Applied Math Recent experience and qualifications Mr. McCullough currently serves as a contracted project manager and primary contact for nine local cities' surface water quality programs and provides as-needed genera technical assistance to 28 local cities. Programs administered include updating SSMPs (including Spill Emergency Response Plans formerly OERPs) and preparing the internal audit required by the General Order, state NPDES stormwater discharge permits (MS4, IGP, CGP), state non-stormwater discharge permits and orders (e.g., sanitary sewer overflows and drinking water system discharges), and local ordinances related to these programs (e.g., for the Safe, Clean Water Program, stormwater and urban runoff pollution prevention, and FOG/I ndustrial Waste Control). The table belowlists specific clients, roles, and tasks for relevant contracted services.

Relevant Experience Currently or Recently Provided Project Manager for contracted Municipal NPDES Program implementation assistance Clients Arcadia, Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, San Gabriel, South Pasadena, Stanton, Villa Park, and West Covina (9 cities total)
Tasks Varies per client, including client representation with watershed groups and regulators, program administration, WMP/TMDL/trash prohibition compliance planning, training, reporting, studies, and oversight of control programs such as inspections and public outreach.

Lead Tectnical Support for as-needed Municipal NPDES technical assistance Clients The clients listed above, as well as Artesia, Baldwin Park, Compton, Covina, Diamond Bar, Downey, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Lomita, Long Beach, Monterey Park, Norwalk, Paramount, Pasadena, Pico Rivera, RPV, Temple City, West Hollywood, and Whittier (28 total) Tasks Varies per client, including but not limited to staff training, NPDES Permit compliance inquiries, and assistance with strategic WMP/TMDL compliance planning.

Lead Tectnical Support for contracted Safe, Clean Water Program (SCWP) implementation assistance Clients The 28 clients listed above, and Hawaiian Gardens, La Mirada, and Lynwood (31 total) Tasks Varies per client, including Annual Plan and Expenditure Report development and preparation, and general technical assistance. For Burbank (2020), Diamond Bar (2020), and South Pasadena (2 in 2020, 1 in 2021), tasks included project concept planning and TRP application preparation.

Project Manager for Watershed Management Group Reporting and WMP Adaptive Management Clients Agencies within the Lower LA River and Lower San Gabriel River Watershed Management Groups Tasks Administering the preparation and adaptive management of WMPs and watershed reporting.

Client Representation for NPDES Program Audits
Clients Compton (2024), Diamond Bar (19), Glendale ('20), Seal Beach ('10, '06), South Gate ('24), Stanton (14, '10), Villa Park (19)
Tasks Represented cities in MS4 NPDES Permit compliance audits from Cal EPA and Federal EPA.

PageA5
35 299
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Education
B.S., Environmental Science, UCR
Certifications and Training
CPSWQ, EnviroCert (#1548)
CESSWI, EnviroCert (#5626)
QSD/P, CASQA (#28450)
Basic Inspector Academy, Cal EPA
Wilson Duong, CPSWQ, CESSWi QSD/P
Senior Inspector
Wilson Duong has nine years of experience with John L. Hunter & Associates, specializing in NPDES and Industrial Waste/FOG Control regulations. His experiences include implementation of Municipal NPDES Programs for Industrial/Commercial Facilities, Development Construction, Public Information and Participation, and Illicit Connections & Illicit Discharge Elimination Programs. In addition, Wilson provides TMDL implementation and reporting, and serves as one ofJLHA's GIS Specialists.

Recent Experience and Project Qualifications
Mr. Duong currently serves as an Environmental Senior Compliance Specialist whose responsibilities include implementing compliance inspection programs for stormwate5 industrial waste, and fats, oils, grease (FOG), as well as providing assistance with the implementation of several Watershed Management Programs in Los Angeles and Orange County, Specific examples of recent experience and project qualifications include:
* Conducting industrial waste and FOG inspections atindustrial/commercial facilities (e.g., food service establishments, food processing, manufacturing, and automotive body/repair/wash). * Assisting with implementation and processing of Industrial Waste/FOG program permitting. (Covina, EI Monte, South EI Monte).
* Assisting with implementation oflndustrial Waste/FOG program fee recovery billing. (South EI Monte). * Assisting with reviewing preliminary plumbing plans for new development and tenant improvement projects at Industrial Waste/FOG facilities. (South EI Monte). * Conducting NPDES compliance inspections at industrial/commercial facilities (e.g., food facilities, automotive facilities, and facilities subject to the Industrial General Permit), and construction sites. * Assisting with implementation of Senate Bill 205 (Business Licenses: Storm Water Discharge Compliance). (Artesia, La Mirada, Long Beach, Pico Rivera, Signal Hill, Stanton, West Covina). * Training and supervising new JLHA inspectors on proper inspection procedures for the NPDES, and Industrial Waste/FOG programs.
* Developing and maintaining inspection facility databases for the NPDES, and Industrial Waste/FOG programs
* Assisting with the implementation component of Trash TMDLs. (Burbank, Monterey Park). * Assisting with the implementation component of the Lower Los Angeles River Trash Minimum Frequency of Assessment and Collection (MFAC/BMP) Programs. (Burbank, Glendale, Long Beach, Pico Rivera).
* Assisting with the development of GIS-based implementation plans to comply with the Statewide Trash Provisions for 22 local municipalities.
* Developing and maintaining GIS databases of 1) potential sites for low impact development (LID) retrofit projects to comply with various Watershed Management Programs.

PageA6
300
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Education
s.s., Earth and Environmental Science, UCI
Certifications and Training
CPESC, EnviroCert (#16358)
CESSWI, EnviroCert (#4942)

QSP, CASQA

QISP, CASQA
Basic Inspector Academy, Cal EPA
Spanish fluency
Glenn Cajar, CPESC, CESSWI, QSP, QISP
Seriior Cornpliance Specialist
Glenn Cajar has 11 years of experience with John L. Hunter & Associates, specializingin municipal surface water quality and conservation regulations. His experiences include work in 1) the Municipal NPDES Programs for Industrial/Commercial
Facilities, Construction, Public Outreach, and Illicit Discharge Elimination, 2) spill prevention through the Industrial Waste and Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Programs, and 3) conservation through statewide drought emergency
regulations and the Clean Bay Restaurant (CBR) Program in the Santa Monica Bay.

Recent Experience and Project Qualifications
Glenn currently serves as an Environmental Compliance Specialist II. Specific examples of recent and relevant experience under this role include the following:

NPDES
Conducting NPDES compliance inspections at industrial/commercial facilities (e.g., food facilities, automotive facilities, and facilities subject to the NPDES Industrial General Permit) Assisting facilities under the NPDES Industrial General Permit with permitting and compliance.

Conducting NPDES compliance inspections at construction sites, including those under the NPDES Construction General Permit.

Serving as a QSP under the Construction General Permit. (Long Beach) Assisting industrial businesses with SB 205 compliance.

Training municipal staffin the illicit discharge component of the Municipal NPDES Permit. (Signal Hill) Training municipal staff in the Drinking Water Systems NPDES Permit. (Signal Hill) Preparing NPDES permit applications under the Drinking Water Systems NPDES Permit. (Several Cities) Assisting with the implementation of Trash TMDL field studies, including the DGR and MFAC studies.

Developing educational materials for use by municipal staff, industrial/commercial businesses, and construction site operators.

Industrial Waste and FOG
* Conducting Industrial Waste and FOG inspections at industrial and commercial facilities. (Several cities)
* AssiSting with implementation and processing of Industrial Waste/FOG program permitting. (Signal Hill)
* Assisting with implementation of Industrial Waste/FOG program fee recovery billing. (Signal Hill) * Assisting with reviewing preliminary plumbing plans for new development and tenant improvement projects at Industrial Waste/FOG facilities. (Signal Hill).

Conservation
* Conducting water conservation inspections. (Seal Beach) * Assisting in the program management of the Clean Bay Restaurant (CBR) Program and conducting CBR inspections at restaurants. The CBR Program incorporates solid waste recycling requirements, as well as NPDES and FOG requirements.

PageA7
3") 301
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Education
B.A., Environmental Science, CSULB
Certifications and Training

QISP, CASQA
24 Hour HAZWOPER Training
Basic Inspector Academy, Cal EPA
CEQA Practice certificate, UCSD Extension
Brandon LaBeet, QISP
Compliance Specialist 17
Brandon LaBeet has six years of experience with John L.

Hunter & Associates, specializing in NPDES and Industrial Waste/FOG Control regulations. His experiences include work in 1) the Municipal NPDES Programs for
Industrial/Commercial Facilities, Construction, Public Outreach, and Illicit Discharge Elimination, and 2) spill prevention through the Industrial Waste and Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Programs.

Recent Experience and Project Qualifications
Brandon currently serves as an Environmental Compliance Specialist II whose responsibilities include implementing compliance inspection programs for stormwater, industrial waste, and fats, oils, grease (FOG), as well as providing assistance with the implementation of several Watershed Management Programs in Los Angeles. Specific examples of recent experience and project qualifications include:
* Conducting industrial waste and FOG inspections at industrial/commercial facilities (e.g., food service establishments, food processing, manufacturing, and automotive body/repair/wash). * Assisting with implementation and processing of Industrial Waste/FOG program permitting. (Signal Hill, Stanton).
* Assisting with implementation oflndustrial Waste/FOG program fee recovery billing. (Signal Hill). * Conducting NPDES compliance inspections at industrial/commercial facilities (e.g., food facilities, automotive facilities, and facilities subject to the Industrial General Permit). * Assisting with implementation of Senate Bill 205 (Business Licenses: Storm Water Discharge Compliance). (Pico Rivera, Stanton).
* Developing and maintaining inspection facility databases for the NPDES, and Industrial Waste/FOG programs.
* Assisting with the implementation component of Trash TMDLs. (Burbank, Monterey Park). * Assisting with the implementation component of the Lower Los Angeles River Trash Minimum Frequency of Assessment and Collection (MFAC/BMP) Programs. (Glendale, Long Beach, Pasadena).

PageA8
.3'3 302
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Education
B.S., Earth System Science, UCI
Certifications and Training
CESSWI, EnviroCert
QISP, CASQA (#01405)
24 Hour HAZWOPER Training
Basic Inspector Academy, Cal EPA
Spanish fluency
Erick Barrales, CESSWI, QSP, QISP
Compliance Specialist 17
Erick Barrales has six years of experience with John L. Hunter & Associates, specializing in NPDES and Industrial Waste/FOG Control regulations. His experiences include implementation of Municipal NPDES Programs for Industrial/Commercial
Facilities, Development Construction, Public Information and Participation, and Illicit Connections & Illicit Discharge Elimination Programs.

Recent Experience and Project Qualifications
Erick currently serves as an Environmental Compliance Specialist II whose responsibilities include implementing compliance inspection programs for stormwater, industrial waste, and fats, oils, grease (FOG), as well as providing assistance with the implementation of several Watershed Management Programs in Los Angeles. Specific examples of recent experience and project qualifications include:
* Conducting industrial waste and FOG inspections at industrial/commercial facilities (e.g., food service establishments, food processing, manufacturing, and automotive body/repair/wash). * Assisting with implementation and processing of Industrial Waste/FOG program permitting. (El Monte, South Gate, South EI Monte).
* Assisting with implementation of Industrial Waste/FOG program fee recovery billing. (South El Monte).
* Conducting NPDES compliance inspections at industrial/commercial facilities (e.g., food facilities, automotive facilities, and facilities subject to the Industrial General Permit), and construction sites that disturb <1 acre.
* Assisting with implementation of Senate Bill 205 (Business Licenses: Storm Water Discharge Compliance). (Paramount, South EI Monte, South Gate, Temple City). * Developing and maintaining inspection facility databases for the NPDES, and Industrial Waste/FOG programs.
* AssistingwiththeimplementationcomponentofTrashTMDLsiBurbank,MontereyPark). * Assisting with the implementation component of the Lower Los Angeles River Trash Minimum Frequency of Assessment and Collection (MFAC/BMP) Programs. (Glendale, Long Beach, Pasadena).

PageA9
3i 303
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025 Overview
Chris Chew, PE, QSD
Staff Civil Engineer
Mr. Chew serves as a Staff Civil Engineer. He has over 20 years of municipal experience reviewing structural and architectural plans. His specialty lies in reviewing such plans for compliance with Permits (including MS4), City ordinances (including LID and Green Streets /Erosion Control), Building Codes, and other State Laws.

Education
M.S. Civil Engineering, Texas Tech University
s.s. Civil Engineering, Texas Tech University
Related Experience
With JLHA (Starting 2021)
Certifications and Licenses
CA Professional Civil Engineer (#47147)
Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD)
Reviews structural and architectural plans and residential and large and complicated buildings for compliance with the MS4 Permit, City Ordinances and State Law.

Interacts with developers to facilitate completion of their projects.

Code Consultant.

City of Glendale, Principal Civil Engineer (2015-2020) Supervise and manage the Land Development, GIS, Surveying, Real Property, Stormwater and Wastewater Sections.

Supervise and manage the review of grading and public improvement plans, encroachment plans, subdivision maps, covenant and agreements, street vacations and dedications.

Update City's ordinances relating to engineering requirements in the Glendale Municipal Code, Glendale Building Code and Low Impact Development Ordinance.

Review development plans for construction and code compliance.

Represent the City of Glendale in meetings with other public agencies relating to wastewater and stormwater issues.

Manage and implement the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) program.

Responsible for the management of the Wastewater contracts with City of Los Angeles relating to the Amalgamated System and the Los Angeles Glendale Water Reclamation Plant.

Manage wastewater rate study involving cost of service analysis.

Solicit, prepare, and manage professional service agreements.

Coordinate with architects, engineers, contractors, and other City staffs on development projects.

Review City Council's staff report submittals.

Review and evaluate employee's job performance.

City of Glendale, Senior Civil Engineer (2009-2015) Supervise and manage the Land Development, GIS, and Surveying Groups.

Review development plans for construction and code compliance.

Determine requirements for subdivisions, grading permits, construction permits and bonds.

Coordinate with architects, engineers, contractors, and other City staffs on development projects.

Review Council's staff report submittals.

Response to citizen's requests and complaints.

Manage the construction of federally funded slope repair project and supervise the analysis and reports on disputed construction costs, procedures, bids, and contract.

Oversee preparation and revision of maps, surveys, wastewater records, and the storage and filing of various records and project files.

Develop a handbook that describes the permitting procedures for various permits.

Review and evaluate employee's job performance.

P a g e A 10
304
Exhibit "B"
Professional Service for the Management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program "i
< : 4,

MUNIC CTOR
DATE OF FEE PROPOSAL SUBMI1TAL: 2025.06.09
Prepared for: City Clerk's Office
Attn: Arturo (,ervantes
Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
City of South Gate
865€ California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Prepared by: John L. Hunter & Associates
6131 0rangethorpe Ave #30€
Buena Park, (,A 90620
Jillian Brickey John Hunter
C[;.('it 8.i\;)
Project Manager
[email protected]
562.623.5[]81
Principal
[email protected]
310344.8650
305
Professional Service for the Management of the IW Program and FOG Control Program June 9, 2025

1. Fee Proposal

1.1. Rate Schedule
The following rates are subject to consumer price index (CPI) increases in subsequent years. Rates are based on JLHA's employee titles. Employee titles for the key team members are listed in their resumes. JLHA does not add charges for overhead items.

Principal S227 / hour
Director S201 / hour
Program Manager S201 / hour
Staff Engineer S201 / hour
Project Manager S191 / hour
Assistant Project Manager !>170 / hour
Project Engineer !>170 / hour
Senior Compliance Specialist !>150 / hour
Compliance Specialist II S140 / hour
Project Analyst II S140 / hour
Compliance SpecialistI S129 / hour
Project Analyst I S129 / hour
Administrative Assistant, Laborer 588 / hour
State Certified Laboratory Analysis Cost + 5%
Subcontracted equipment COSt + 5%

1.2. Not-to-Exceed Annual Cost
The annual not-to-exceed costs for the services are included in Table 1. This project will be on a time and materials basis. We will provide consultant services not to exceed the budgetary amount without the City"s prior authorization.

Pagel
!,l 306
Table 1. Estimated Not-to-Exceed Annual Costs for M/FOG Services Task name Rate UnitS
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Option Year 4 Option Year 5 Cost l Total Cost. l Total Cost l Total Cost l Total Cost l Total 1- Program Management S4,202 S4,329 54,460 S4,596 '>4,737 1 S191 4 S764 S787
S2,361
S394
S787
S811
S2,432
S406
S811
S836 S862
S2,581
S432
5862
) S191 12 S2,292 S2,505
3 S191 2 S382 S419
4 S191 4 S764 S836
2 - Inspections and Enforcement 956,231 S57,924 S59,667 S61,459 §63,308 1 (assume 357 routine inspectioni S129 357 S46,053 S47,435 54,784
SO
SO
S2,102
S798
S351
S701
SO
S351
S351
SO
Sl,051
548,859
S4,928
SO
SO
S_:',166
S822
S362
S723
SO
S362
SO
Sl,083
S50,325 S51,835
S5,229
SO
SO
S2,298
S873
S385
S768
SO
S385
S385
SO
Sl,150
2 (assume 10% of routine) S129 36 S4,644 S5,076
3 (included with Task 2.1) S129 o SO SO
4 (included with Task 2.1) S129 o SO §O
5 lassume 4 per year) S170 12 S2,040 S2,231
6 (assume 6 inspections) S129 6 S774 S847
7 S170 2 S340 S373
8 S170 4 !>680 S745
9 (included with Task 21) S150 o SO SO
10 S170 2 !;i340 S373
11 S170 2 S340 S373
12 (included with Task 2.6) S129 o SO SO
13 S170 6 Sl,020 Sl,116
3 - Outreach S2,548 S2,625 S2,705 S2,787 S2,872
1 S170 6 Sl,020 Sl,051
Sl,574
Sl,083
Sl,622
51,116 Sl,150
Sl,7222 S191 8 Sl,528 Sl,671
Total Yearly Cost S62,981 S64,878 S66,832 S68,842 970,917 GrGarnadnTdoTt0atlafo, froTrhFrleVee yYeeaarrss** uS334450 " We estimate there to be approximately 186 Class A businesses with an inspection fee of S368, 17 Class B at S733, 26 Class C at Sl,102, 11 Class D at §1,467, and 3 Class E at Sl,721 Thus the City's potential annual return is 5130,861 We anticipate our estimate will be significantly lower than the City's actual annual return Also note that the City's approved funding for the last five years was estimated at 557,000 per year. Our not-to-exceed annual cost for this period started at SS4,435. Since that time, the CPI has increased by approximately 20% The first year estimate above is an increase of 15 7% over the same five year period, under the CPI by 3.3%.
307
s=r-iui'i'i'c" :lt:- (1"i'll'7':':,i... Item No. 4
IUL 'ni '!(]?'s fD',25-x
FILED Ci§ of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL
ACENDA JB3Y.LL
Department Director:

For the Regular Meeting o'f: July 22, 2025
Ori a a Department: Public Works
CUy Manager:

Rob Houston
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE HOLLYDALE COMMUNITY PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT N0. 607-PRK.

PURPOSE: Construction of the Hollydale Cornrnunity Park Improvement Project ("Project") has been completed. The City of South Gate ("City") must formally accept the completion of the Project.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider:
a. Accepting completion of construction, effective January 31, 2025, of the Hollydale Community Park Improvement, City Project No. 607-PRK, constructed by 22 Construction; and
b. Approve Contract Change Order in the amount of $109,495; c. Appropriate $75,000 from Circle Park Project, Account No. 311-790-61-9217 to Hollydale Community Park Project, Account No. 311-790-61-9220; and d. Directing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Registrar Recorder's Office.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. The Project was funded with $7,129,942 in grant and local return funds, as shown in the Budget Summary (See Attachment E). The final construction contract amount is $2,003,983, which is inclusive of (a) the $2,001,372 contract amount, (b) an increase of $109,495, (c) and the reconciliation of quantities of $106,885. The net construction cost is $2,003,983.

ANALYSIS: Construction of the Project was substantially completed on January 31, 2025.

There were no Stop Notices against the project. As such, based on the Public Contract Code section 7107, staff has prepared and released the final payment of the 5% retention held from construction invoice payments to 22 Construction since it has been more than 60 days of cessation of work on the project.

BACKGROUND: The Project is included in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") and was programmed to support the renovation of the park. Improvements completed as part of the Project include a new 1,700-square-foot building, a rubberized walking path, synthetic turf, a movie screen, a new irrigation system, and updated landscaping.

Additional enhancements consist of a new basketball court, two shade structures with pi,cnic 1 308
areas, and a new wrought iron perimeter fence to the east and an 8-foot-high block wall to the west. The Project also features a subsurface water chamber designed to capture and recharge rainwater.

These upgrades significantly enhance recreational opportunities for residents, improve the overall quality of life in the community, and support healthier lifestyles. In addition, the use of synthetic turf, drought-tolerant landscaping, and efficient irrigation systems will help reduce long-term maintenance and water costs for the City.

On August 27, 2024, the City Council approved Contract No. 2024-68-CC with 22 Construction, for the re-renovation of the Hollydale Community Park, City Project No. 607- PRK, in an amount not-to-exceed $2,001,372. Construction began on September 16, 2024, and it was completed on January 31, 2025.

One contract change order in the amount of $109,495 was approved administratively to complete necessary work at the park. This included restoring landscaping, repairing drainage issues, adding decorative stonework, installing a new chain link fence between the north wall and the existing building, adding lighting and electrical work, and completing other minor improvements. A full list of these items is provided in the Change Order Log.

The final construction cost of Hollydale Community Park was $2,003,983.

The contractor has successfully fulfilled all contract obligations, completing the project in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The work was performed with quality craftsmanship, delivered within budget, and completed on schedule. Final inspections have confirmed that all improvements meet the required standards.

With the project now complete and all contract requirements satisfied, the City Council is in a position to formally accept the project and authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder's Office.

ATT ACHMENTS: A. Notice of Completion
B. Budget Summary
C. Change Order No. 1
D. Change Order Log
E. Contract No. 2024-68-CC*
*Each document is available for review through the City Clerk's Office.

ES:lc
2 309
Attachment A
RECORDING REQtJESTED BY

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

I AFTERRECORDINGMAILTO J

CITY CLERK OFFICE

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
8650 CALIFORNIA AVENUE
SOUTH GATE, CA 90280
L J
SPACE ABOVE TmS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE is hereby given that:

I The undersigned is owner of the interest stated below in the property hereinafter described; 2 The NAME (including that of the undersigned), ADDRESS and NAT{JRE OF TITLE of every person owning any Interest in such property is as follows:

F{JLLNAME FULLADDRESS NATUREOFTITLE
City of South Gate 8650 California Avenue In Fee
South Gate, CA 90280
3 The names and addresses of the transferors of the undersigned owner: (to be shown if the undersigned is a successor in interest of the owner who caused the improvement to be constructed, etc.) 4 A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED ON 1/31/2025 5 The name of the CONTRACTOR, if any, for such work of improvement was 22 Construction, 1850 E. 17" St. Ste 204 Santa Ana, CA 92705
6 The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of South Gate County of Los Angeles, State of California, and is described as follows:

HOLLYDALE COMMUNITY PARK IMROVEMENTS PROJECT,
CITY PROJECT N0. 607-PRK
7 The street and address of said property is: 11220 Industrial Ave.

South Gate, CA 90280
Dated: July 22, 2025
8 Signature of
Owner or Owners Maria Davila, Mayor
City of South Gate
310
A Notary Public or other officer completirxg t1iis
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the documem to wliich this certificate is
attached, arid not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
" o that document.

ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SS
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of 20, ly , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.

Signature: Place Notary Seal Above
311
Project Description
Hollydale Community Park,
City Project No. 607-PRK
Account No. 311-790-61-9220
i l
: FundtngSources l
I
l Proii 68'
Rend6n
FY21/22_
Prop A
I
Surety .

Rendon
ff-23/24
Rete'ntion
Nm
Total Budget
$4,158,942 $1,600,000 $285,000 $500,000 $475,000 I $189,000 $7,207,942 NR Development (Phase I Constniction) $3,359,130 $3,359,130 22 Construction (Phase II Constniction) $793,412 $747,458 $353,618 $1,894,488 Contract Change Order No. l $109,495 $109,495
Constniction Contingency $150,000 $150,000
Constniction Management/Inspection - Z&K $438,839 $438,839 Z&K - Amendment No. 1 $74,064 $74,064
Z&K - Amendment No. 2 $74,816 $74,816
Z&K - Amendment No. 3 $43,414 $43,414
Z&K - Amendment No. 4 $71,409 $109,162 $180,571
Z&K - Amendment No. 5 $88,950 $88,950
Z&K Consultant; Constnictability Review $13,820 $13,820 Project Management/Staff $75,000 $100,000 $175,000
David Volz Design; Constniction Support $6,400 $45,000 $51,400 David Volz Design Amendment No.l $41,298 $41,298
David Volz Design Amendment No. 2 $46,919 $46,919
Long Beach Conservation Corps $24,388 $24,388
Executive Management Security $49,500 $49,500
Other Expenses $720 $36,887 $158,034 $189,000 $384,641 Total Project Costs $4,158,942 $1,600,000 $285,000 $500,000 $467,791 $189,000 $7,200,733 'Ji

ATT ACHMENT E

BUDGET SUMMARY
312
Attachment C
City of South Gate, Public Works Department
Contract Change Order
5tyd
South
(,ate
Date:6/'19/2025 ChangeOrderNo.Ol Mcount No. 3alal-79(1-61-9220 Contractor: 22 Construction Contract No. 2024-68-CC Contract Date: 8/27/2024 At.count Code
Platx Reference : Hollydale Community Park Improvement Project, City Project No. 607-PRK Change0rderAmount:$109,495 ExtenslonofContraci:40WD
Reason for Change: Additional improvement and other modifications to plans were needed whlch were not part of the origlnal contract
Description of Change: See attached COR Log
Original Contract Amount
Total of Previous Authorized Change Orders
New Change Order Amount (see attached Log)
Total New Contract Amount
Less Reconciliation of Quantities
Net This Contract Change Order
Total New Contract Amount
2,001,372.39
109,495.00
2,110,867.39
(106,884.89)
2,610.11
2,003,982.50
The Changes described above are hereby authorized.

Approved: ,20
Contr' 4s7
Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works
Arturo Cervantes, P.E.

City Manager Rob Houston
Original - Proiect File
CC: - Contractor
- Department
Date
313

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER / PO AMENDMENT
CHANGE ORDER #: l CITY PROJECT #: 607-PRK
PROJECT TITLE: Hollydale Con'ununity Park PURCtIASE ORDER #: 0008854 CONTRACT #: 2024-68-CC
CONTRACTOR: 22 Consti'uction
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Elias Saikaly
DATE OF REPORT: 6/1 9/2025
Pg l ofl
Cost
Calendar
Davs
Original contract/Pa ainount: $ 2,001,372.39 60
Prev-iousChangeOrders amount: $
This Changc Order amount: $ 109,495.00 40
Total increase to contract (all change orders) to date: $ 109,495.00 Revised total contract amount: $ 2,110,867.39 100
Percentage of total increase (or decrease) to contract amount to date: 5.47oA DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE ORDER WORK TO BE PERFORMED, ESTIMATE OF 0UANTITIES, AND PRICES TO BE PAID:
a ' -- --'= ' a - ' - " a '.- a " ,_ClhQe irl:pid iteffi Qantiti6 0 T y - ." a" xa' -"" - t'a ' . i.i. Y " a . .h7, i ., ' s . = s ._. = i g % , , ' _ 01 " a'-.i a - u-a. - q@). - ' * as " _ a H,,'_ _. ' Item # Detailed description
Contract
Quiintity
Previous
Cliange
Order
Qiiantity
THIS
Change
Order
Quantity
Total
Adjusted
Contract
Quantity
Unit Unit
Cost
Cliange Order
Cost
Time
Extension
Working
Days
l
Additional Improveinents per COR
Log 1 1 LS $ 109,495.00 $ 109,495.00 40
2 Reconciliation of Quantities LS $ (106,884.89) $ (106,884.89:
_40
$ 2,610.11
I
Approval Recommended by:

Elias Saikaly, P.E. Project Manager
Approved by:

Arhim Cervantes, P.E. Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works Appmved by:

Luis Frausto; Director of Administrative Services
Date:

Date:

Date:
l 314
Attachment D
Contractor 22 Construction Inc.

Contract No. 2)24-68-CC
Hollydale Community Park
607-PRK

CCO LOG
Date 6/'1 6/2025
COR Log Description Approved Cost Working Day
COR #O1 Business License $
COR #02 Additional Pavers at Shade Structure Area $ COR #03 Skateboard Deterrent $ 3,862.00 1
COR #04 Temporaiy Fencing After Wood Wall Removal $ 1,416.00 1 COR #05 Additional Drain Repair and Adjustments $ 4,403.00 3 COR #06 Sawcut & Remove Concrete for Roof Drain Connection Tie-in $ 1,565.00 1 COR #07 Prime and paint Steel Columns $ 1,704.00 'l COR #08 NR Dev. Temporary Fence Removal $ 4,212.00 2 COR #09 Reestablish Landscaping $ 18,625.00 10
COR #10 Additional Veneer at Art Area $ 6,400.00 4
COR #1 1 Site Sanitary Services for Temporary facilities $ 608.00 o COR #12 Additional Store Front Hardware-Door Closures $ 2,376.00 o COR #13 Executive Management Secunty $
COR #14 1 0'x1 ' Chain Link Fence with 2 Posts $ 7,293.00 3 COR #15 Remove and Replace Irrigation Controller Pad $ 1,192.00 1 COR#16 Seatwall Stone-Not Provided per Bid Material List $ 5,874.00 o COR #17 Floor Tile Incorrect per Bid Material List $ COR #18 Install Attic Lighting $ 5,145.00 1
COR #19 Add Surface Mounted Light Switches on Light Poles $ 934.00 1 COR #20 Install Conduit for an Outside Outlet $ 3,473.00 i COR #21 Additional Wall Pack Lighting $ 3,853.00 2
COR #22 Power for Toilet Flush Valve $ 3,235.00 1
COR #23 Temporary Power Connection $ 8,826.00 1
COR #24 Basketball Assembly-Missing Pieces $
COR #25 Underground Plumbing Connection to Main Sewer Line Tie-In $ COR #26 Concrete Curbing Trip Hazard $ 1,612.00 2
COR #27 Install Bollards Around Power Pole ($3,536) $ COR #32 Additional Compensation for Early Finish (Per City Council) $ COR #34 Paint Wrought Iron Fence $
COR #35 Concrete Slurry behind North CMU Wall $ 5,467.00 1 COR #36 Apply Window Film $
COR #37 Install sinks, faucets and Blowers-Outside Restrooms $ 14,529.00 2 COR #38 Apply Anti-Graffiti Coating on CMU and Playground $ 2,891.00 1 Subtotal COR S 109,495.00 40
;7/f/
H kr?b4-
+-Cbpi,ir"ic-6c)
315
Attachment D
Contractor 22 Construction Inc.

Contract No. 2")24-68-CC
Hollydale Community Park
607-PRK

CCO LOG
Date 6/16/2025
COR Log Description Approved Cost Working Day
COR #O1 Business License $
COR #02 Additional Pavers at Shade Structure Area $ COR #03 Skateboard Deterrent $ 3,862.00 1
COR #04 Temporary Fencing Afier Wood Wall Removal $ 1,416.00 1 COR #05 Additional Drain Repair and Adjustments $ 4,403.00 3 COR #06 Sawcut & Remove Concrete for Roof Drain Connection Tie-in $ 1,565.00 1 COR #07 Prime and paint Steel Columns $ 1,704.00 1
COR #08 NR Dev. Temporary Fence Removal $ 4,212.00 2 COR #09 Reestablish Landscaping $ 18,625.00 10
COR #10 Additional Veneer at Art Area $ 6,400.00 4
COR #1 1 Site Sanitary Services for Temporary facilities $ 608.00 o COR #i2 Additional Store Front Hardware-Door Closures $ 2,376.00 o COR #13 Executive Management Security $
COR #14 10'x1'Chain Link Fence with 2 Posts $ 7,293.00 3 COR #15 Remove and Replace Irrigation Controller Pad $ il92.00 1 COR #16 Seatwall Stone-Not Provided per Bid Material List $ 5,874.00 o COR #17 Floor Tile Incorrect per Bid Material List $ COR#18 Install Attic Lighting $ 5,145.00 1
COR #19 Add Sufface Mounted Light Switches on Light Poles $ 934.00 I COR #20 Install Conduit for an Outside Outlet $ 3,473.00 1 COR #21 Additional Wall Pack Lighting $ 3,853.00 2
COR #22 Power for Toilet Flush Valve $ 3,235.00 I
COR #23 Temporary Power Connection $ 8,826.00 1
COR #24 Basketball Assembly-Missing Pieces $
COR #25 Underground Plumbing Connection to Main Sewer Line Tie-In $ COR #26 Concrete Curbing Trip Hazard $ 1,612.00 2
COR #27 Install Bollards Around Power Pole ($3,536) $ COR #32 Additional Compensation for Early Finish (Per City Council) $ COR #34 Paint Wrought Iron Fence $
COR #35 Concrete Slurry behind North CMU Wall $ 5,467.00 1 COR #36 Apply Window Film $
COR #37 Install sinks, faucets and Blowers-Outside Restrooms $ 14,529.00 2 COR #38 Apply Anti-Graffiti Coating on CMU and Playground $ 2,891.00 I Subtotal COR § 109,495.00 40
3k-H ;rmc4-
'E3 Ctiyi,54r'tez%+'t-a"'1
O! 316
1111 ! 7 702!-. %'-"'>Of'
CUy of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL
Item No. 5
FdLFD
AGENDA BJ[LL
For the Regular Meeting of: July 22, 2025
Originating ent: i m.
nepartmentnirector: 4p, -' cityuanager:
(3abrielYerez L W
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH

ENVIRONMENT AL CONSULTING
WITH J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC.

AND 5625 SOUTHERN AVENUE

KIMLEY-HORN TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES, AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
TO PAY FOR COSTS FOR A PROJECT AT 5440, 5532,
PURPOSE: To approve a professional environmental consulting services contract with Kimley-Horn for preparation of environmental documentation for a project to develop an operations center with truck parking on three properties totaling 23.61 acres located at 5440, 5532, and 5625 Southern Avenue, and approve a reimbursement agreement with the applicant, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. to pay for costs. The proposed project will develop the northern property for truck parking during the first phase, and redevelop the southern properties to serve as the West Coast Operations Center headquarters during the second phase.

It should be noted that the proposed project is not under consideration, but only the contracts needed to begin the environmental documentation.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider:
a. Approving the Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn to provide on-call environmental consulting services;
b. Approving a Reimbursement Agreement with J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.; c. Authorizing the use of Purchase orders in directing work; and d. Authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreements in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as the applicant is responsible for paying the City of Sout Gate's ("City") consultant's costs and administrative costs.

ANALYSIS: The Plaru'iing Division of the Community Development Department requires the use of consultants to assist with environmental services that are either beyond the capacity of plaru'iing staff due to the scope of a project or when the project analysis requires special expertise.

Kimley-Horn is part of the City's environmental consulting "bench" which is a list of three consultants the City contracted with in June 2022 to provide on-call environmental services. Staff reached out to the bench consultants about the need for environmental services for the proposed project and received a proposal from Kimley-Horn, which was found acceptable by staff and the applicant.

The applicant is responsible for paying the cost of the City's consultant for work on the applicant's project and staff time. For an environmental impact report ("EIR"), the payment covers "Consultant's Fee plus 25% Admin Fee." Typically, a deposit is made by the applicant to the City for the amount identified in 1the consultant's proposal, plus 25% as required in the City's Fee Schedule. 317
In this case, the applicant is ready and willing to reimburse the City for any and all costs incurred by staff related to the review of the environmental documents. However, the applicant is requesting to put the necessary amoiu'it on deposit to be drawn down and invoiced based on actual staff costs (e.g., hours worked). The reimbursement agreement provides for a deposit of the full amount of all funds required by the City: Kimley-Horn's costs and administrative costs for staff time. The agreement makes clear the amounts are deposits that should be drawn upon as actual work is expended by Kimley-Horn and the City.

The applicant contends that a flat fee based solely on 25% of Kimley-Horn's costs would not be appropriate under the Mitigation Fee Act, which prohibits local agencies from charging fees for filing and processing applications that exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged. Government Code § 66014(a) reads as follows:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a local agency charges fees for zoning variances; zoning changes; use permits; building inspections; building permits; filing and processing applications and petitions filed with the local agency formation commission or conducting preliminary proceedings or proceedings under the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3 (cornmencing with Section 56000) of Title 5; the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 7; or planning services under the authority of Chapter 3 (cornmencing with Section 65100) of Division 1 of Title 7 or under any other authority; fees may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services or materials is submitted to, and approyed by, a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting on the issue. {Emphasis addedl The applicant argues that imposing a flat fee for CEQA review based solely on the total dollar value of a contract is not reasonably related to the cost of the services provided by staff. Simply put, the contracted price for preparation of the environmental document by Kimley-Horn does not determine or relate to the level of staff service required and is reimbursable in connection with the processing of an EIR for a project. The fee for City staff services should be totaled separately and based on a metric that reasonably reflects the degree of services provided. The proposed reimbursement agreement remedies this issue by basing staff's costs on a rate of $155 per hour, which is the hourly rate for a senior planner.

City Council should keep in mind that other applicants have been charged the 25% administrative fee as required. The proposed reimbursement agreement would set a precedence in which staff would monitor its time for billing purposes and the City would have to refund the applicant for any unused funds remaining in the deposit. Alternatively, City Council could deny the reimbursement agreement and the applicant would still have to pay the costs based on the fee listed in the City's adopted Fee Schedule. Per Section 11.51.100 of the South Gate Municipal Code, all filing fees established by the City shall be paid upon the filing of an application. Thus, ifthe fee is not paid, staff will not begin work onthe environmental documentation needed for the project.

ATT ACHMENTS: A. Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn B. Kimley-Horn's Proposal for Preparation of an EIR, Technical Studies, and Related Services for the J.B. Hunt West Coast Operations Center Project dated August 26, 2024
C. Reimbursement Agreement with J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 2 318
Attachment A

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH
GATE AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

This Agreement for Professional Services for Environmental Services ("Agreement") is made and entered into on July 22, 2025 , by and between the City of South Gate, a municipal corporation ("City"), and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., a North Carolina corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereina'[ter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

RECIT ALS
WHEREAS, City desires to retain a qualified provider for certain services relating to the preparation of environmental documentation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act;
WHEREAS, Consultant warrants to City that it has the requisite skills, knowledge, qualifications, manpower and expertise to perform properly and timely the Professional Services under this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, based on such representation, City desires to contract with Consultant to perform the services as described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A" of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. City hereby engages Consultant, and Consultant accepts such engagement, to perform the services set forth in the Scope of Services as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part of this Agreement. The Scope of Services may be muhially amended from time to time by both Parties in writing.

2. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES. The total amount of compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed the sum of Three Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand One Hundred Forty Dollars ($395,140.00) as described in Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A." City shall pay Consultant for its professional services rendered and costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved in writing by the Director of Community Development ("Director") or his/her designee.

2.1 Consultant shall be required to attend meetings at City Hall as necessary in the delivery of the projects. Travel time between Consultant's office and City Hall shall not be billable. Consultant may request an exemption on a case-by-case basis, which shall be subject to City approval.

2.2 Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the schedule included in Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A." City shall pay Consultant within thirty (30) 5116863.1-L235.0 (Fomi Rev. 01/17/23)
3 319
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

days of receipt of the invoice.

2.3 No payment made hereunder by City to Consultant, other than the final payment, shall be construed as an acceptance by City of any work or materials, nor as evidence of satisfactory performance by Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement.

3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement is effective as of July 22, 2025 , and will remain in effect through and until project completion, unless otherwise expressly extended and agreed to by both Parties in writing, or terminated by either Party as provided herein.

4. CITY AGENT. The Director, or his/her designee, for the purposes of this Agreement, is the agent for City. Whenever approval or authorization is required, Consultant understands that the Director, or his/her designee, has the authority to provide that approval or authorization.

5. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Consultant represents that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in any real property located in the City which may be affected by the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement.

Consultant further represents that in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Within ten (10) days, Consultant agrees that it will immediately notify City of any other conflict of interest that may exist or develop during the term of this Agreement.

5.1 Consultant represents that no City employee or official has a material financial interest in Consultant's business. During the term of this Agreement and/or as a result of being awarded this Agreement, Consultant shall not offer, encourage or accept any financial interest in Consultant's business or in this Agreement by any City employee or official.

6. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

6.1 Termination for Convenience. City may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause by giving fifteen (15) days written notice to Consultant of such termination and speci'fying the effective date thereof. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of City, become its property. If this Agreement is terminated by City as provided herein, Consultant will be paid the total amount of its costs as of the termination date. In no event shall the amount payable upon termination exceed the total maximum compensation provided for in this Agreement.

6.2 Termination for Cause.

6.2.1 City may, by written notice to Consultant, tertninate the whole or any part of this Agreement in any of the following circumstances:
a. If Consultant fails to perform the services required by this Agreement within the time specified herein or any authorized extension thereof; or 5116863.1-L235.0
320
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

b. If Consultant fails to perfornn the services called for by this Agreement or so fails to make progress as to endanger performance of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and in either of these circumstances does not correct such failure withing a period of ten (10) days (or such longer period as City may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from City specifying such failure.

6.2.2 In the event City terminates this Agreement in whole or in part as provided above in Subsection 6.2.1, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may deem appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

6.2.3 If this Agreement is terminated as provided above in Subsection 6.2.1, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished dociunents, data, studies, drawings, maps, photographs, reports, films, charts, sketches, computations, surveys, models, or other similar documentation prepared by Consultant. Upon such termination, Consultant shall be paid an amount equal to the value of the work performed. In ascertaining the value of the work performed up to the date of termination, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents whether delivered to City or in possession of Consultant, and to authorized reimbursement expenses.

6.2.4 If, after notice of termination of the Agreement under the provisions of Subsection 6.2.1 above, it is determined, for any reason, that Consultant was not in default, or that the default was excusable, then the rights and obligations of the Parties shall be the same as if the notice of termination had been issued pursuant to Subsection 6.1. above.

6.3 Non-Assignability. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the express prior written consent of City.

6.4 Non-Discrimination.

6.4.1 Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of to race, creed, gender, gender identity (including gender expression), color, religion, ancestry, sexual orientation, national origin, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, or veteran/military status, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement and will comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of the federal, state, and county and the City governments. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, sex, national origin, disability, or age. Consultant will 5116863.1-L235.0
321
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

take affirmative action to ensure that all employment practices, including those of any subcontractors retained by Consultant to perform services under this Agreement, are free from such discrimination. Such employment practices include, but are limited to: hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, recniitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

6.4.2 The provisions of Subsection 6.4.2 above shall be included in all solicitations or advertisements placed by or on behalf of Consultant for personnel to perform any services under this Agreement. City shall have access to all documents, data, and records of Consultant and its subcontractors for purposes of determining compliance with the equal employment opportunity and non- discrimination provisions of this Section, and all applicable provisions of Executive Order No. 11246 (relating to federal restrictions against discriminatory practices) is available for review and on file with the City Clerk's Office.

6.5 Insurance. Consultant shall submit to City, certificates indicating compliance with the following minimum insurance requirements no less than one (1) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement:

6.5.1 Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such workers' compensation insurance for their respective employees.

6.5.2 Comprehensive general and automobile liability insurance protecting Consultant in amounts not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/accident for bodily injury and property damage liability. Each such policy of insurance shall:
a. Be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California or which is approved in writing by City.
b. Name and list as additional insured the City, its officers and employees. c. Specify its acts as primary insurance.
d, Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy shall not be canceled except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City of such cancellation or material change."
e, Cover the operations of Consultant pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
5116863.1-L235.0
322
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Page5ofl0

6.5.3 Professional Liability Insurance. Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such professional liability insurance for their respective employees.

6.6 Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and/or any other City agency, including other employees, officers and representatives, for/from any and all claims or actions of any kind asserted against City and/or any other City agency arising out of Consultant's (including Consultant's employees, representatives, products and subcontractors) negligent performance under this Agreement, excepting only such claims or actions which may arise out of sole or active negligence of City and/or any other City agency, or any third parties not acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or under the control of Consultant.

6.7 Compliance with Applicable Law. Consultant and City shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of the Federal, State, County and City governments, without regard to conflict of law principles.

6.8 Independent Contractor. This Agreement is by and between City and Consultant and is not intended, nor shall it be construed, to create the relationship of agency, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association, as between City and Consultant.

6.8.1 Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall have no power to incur any debt or obligation for or on behalf of City. Neither City nor any of its officers or employees shall have any control over the conduct of Consultant, or any of Consultant's employees, except as herein set forth, and Consultant expressly warrants not to, at any time or in any manner, represent that it, or any of its agents, servants or employees are in any manner employees of City, it being distinctly understood that Consultant is and shall at all times remain to City a wholly independent contractor and Consultant's obligations to City are solely such as are prescribed by this Agreement.

6.8.2 Indemnification of CalPERS Determination - In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for CalPERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as, for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

6.8.3 Business License Required. According to Title 2.08.40 of the South Gate Municipal Code, a business license will be required prior to doing business 5116863.1-L235.0
323
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

within the City, even if the business is located outside of the City. Verification of a valid South Gate business license will be required prior to start of work and any fees associated with the acquisition or maintenance of such business license shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant.

6.9 Consultant's Personnel.

6.9.1 All services required under the Agreement will be performed by Consultant, or under Consultant's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits and licenses required by State and local law to perform such services, including, without limitation, a City of South Gate business license as required by the South Gate Municipal Code.

6.9.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing services required by this Agreement, and compliance with all reasonable performance standards established by City.

6.9.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, in"iemployment insurance and Social Security.

6.9.4 Consultant shall indemni'fy and hold harmless City and all other related entities, officers, employees and representatives from any liability, damages, claims, costs, and expenses of any nature arising from alleged violations of personnel practices or of any acts of omissions by Consultant in connection with the work performed arising from this Agreement.

6.10 Copyright. No reports, maps or other documents produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Consultant.

6.11 Legal Construction.

6.11.1 This Agreement is made and entered into in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced, and governed under the laws of the State of California without regard to conflict of law principles.

6.11.2 This Agreement shall be construed without regard to the identity of the persons who drafted its various provisions. Each and every provision of this Agreement shall be construed as though each of the parties participated equally in the drafting of same, and any rule of construction that a document is to be construed against the dra:tting party shall not be applicable to this Agreement. 5116863.1-L235.0
324
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

6.11.3. The article and section, captions and headings herein have been inserted for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of interpretation or construction.

6.11.4. Whenever in this Agreement the context may so require, the masculine gender shall be deemed to refer to and include the feminine and neuter, and the singular shall refer to and include the plural.

6.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and, as so executed, shall constihite an agreement which shall be binding upon all Parties hereto.

6.13 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release. The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished, or relating to Consultant's work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City's check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constihite, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the work prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub- consultants and agents.

6.14 Corrections. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during City's review of Consultant's report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such corrections in a reasonably, timely manner, such correction shall be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant.

6.15 Files. All files of Consultant pertaining to City shall be and remain the property of City. Consultant will control the physical location of such files during the term of this Agreement and shall be entitled to retain copies of such files upon termination of this Agreement.

6.16 Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by a Party to insist upon the performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, irrespective of the length of time for which such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party's right to demand compliance by such other Party in the future. No waiver by a Party of a default or breach of the other party shall be effective or binding upon such a Party unless made in writing by such Party, and no such waiver shall be implied from any omissions by a Party to take any action with respect to such default or breach. No express written waiver of a specified default or breach shall affect any other default or breach, or cover any other period of time, other than any default or breach and/or period 5116863.1-L235.0
325
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

of time specified. All of the remedies permitted or available to a Party iu'ider this Agreement, or at law or in equity, shall be cumulative and alternative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right of remedy.

6.17 Mitigation of Damages. In all such situations arising out of this Agreement, the Parties shall attempt to avoid and minimize the damages resulting from the conduct of the other Party,

6.18 Severability. If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

6.19 Attorneys' Fees. The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any Party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that Party or those Parties may be entitled.

6.20 Entire Agreement and Ampndnicnt,g. This Agreement constitutes the whole agreement between City and Consultant, and neither party has made any representations to the other except as expressly contained herein. Neither party, in executing or performing this Agreement, is relying upon any statement or information not contained in this Agreement. Any amendments, changes or modifications to this Agreement must be made in writing and appropriately executed by both City and Consultant.

6.21 Notices. Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be deemed to have been given by email transmission with confirmation of delivery and depositing said notice in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:

TO CITY:

City of South Gate
Gabriel Perez, Community Development Director
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Email: gperez@,sogate.orz
TEL: (323)563-9566
WITH COURTESY COPY TO:

City of South Gate
Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Email: [email protected]
TEL: (323)563-9510
5116863.1-L235.0
326
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

TO CONSULT ANT:

Kari Cano
Project Manager
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
3801 University Avenue, Suite 300
Riverside, CA 92501
Email: [email protected]
TEL: (951)543-9869

6.22 Warranty of Authorized Signatories. Each of the signatories hereto warrants and represents that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign.

6.23 Consultation with Attorney. Consultant warrants and represents that it has consulted with an attorney or knowingly and voluntarily decided to forgo such a consultation.

6.24 Interpretation Against Drafting Party. City and Consultant agree that they have cooperated in the review and dra'Jting of this agreement. Accordingly, in the event of any ambiguity, neither Party may claim that the interpretation of this Agreement shall be construed against either Party solely because that Party drafted all or a portion of this Agreement, or the clause at issue.

7. CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. In accordance with California SB1439 extended requirements under Government Code Section 84308, also known as the "Levine Act," a disclosure must be filed of political contributions totaling more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) within the previous twelve (12) months, and for three (3) months following the date a final decision is made to award an agreement. Therefore, the City requires that Consultant fill out the California Levine Act Disclosure Statement form available on the City website and submit it to the City Clerk's Office prior to the approval of this Agreement.

8. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Agreement is July 22, 2025 and will remain in effect through and until project completion, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]
5116863.1-L235.0
327
Agreement for Professional Services
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused tis Agreement to be executed and attested by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

By:

Maria Davila, Mayor
Dated:

ATTEST:

By:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: Dg@F'T
Rail F. Salinas, City Attorney
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATF,S, INC.:

By:

Dated:
5116863.1-L235.0
Sl 328
Attachment B
Kimley>>Horn
August 26, 2024
Rebecca Contreras
City of South Gate, Community Development
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Re: Proposal for Preparation of an EIR, Technical Studies, and Related Services for the J.B. Hunt West Coast Operations Center Project
Dear Ms. Contreras, and Members ofthe Selection Committee:

Kimley-Horn is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of South Gate ("City") to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Technical Studies, and Related Services for the JB Hunt West Coast Operations Center Project (Project).

The City needs a consultant who understands and recognizes the unique environmental needs of industrial developments, and who is a recognized leader in providing California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation. Our Kimley-Horn project team has substantial experience assisting local municipalities with all aspects of environmental review and project implementation, including complex EIRs. The Kimley-Horn team also includes ELMT Consulting for biological resources. All other technical studies will be prepared in house by our experts.

Kimley-Horn understands that the City of South Gate has received an application from J.B.HuntTransport,Inc. to develop its west coast operations center located across two parcels (identified as North Parcel and South Parcel) located in the City of South Gate. The Project will be developed in two phases. Phase I would include the development of the North Parcel (located at 5625 Southern Avenue) and is currently developed with a hot mix asphalt plant and concrete and asphalt recycling facility. The existing operations are anticipated to cease in January 2025. Development of the North Parcel would involve the demolition of the existing improvements and redevelopment of the site with (i) a three-story 36,800 square foot ("sf') office building for management, dispatch, logistics planning, human resources, engineering, meetings, training, and employee appreciation events, (ii) 129 automobile parking spaces, and (iii) approximately 377 truck spaces, of which 9 will be temporary and 96 shall be reserved for EV trucks. Phase II would include the redevelopment of the South Parcel. The South Parcel is currently developed with a truck storage yard and terminal that has been owned and operated by Applicant for 38 years. Development of the South Parcel will involve (i) demolition of existing improvements, including an office building, crossdock, guard shack, and shed; (ii) refurbishment of an existing 35,151 sf two-story truck and trailer maintenance facility, (iii) construction of a 9,720 sf covered awning with six dock spaces for fueling and transloading, (iv) addition of a truck scale, dumpster, and diesel exhaust fluid tank, and (iv) repaving and restriping of the site for approximately 72 automobiles, 118 trucks, and 203 trailers.

As outlined in Section B of this proposal, Kimley-Horn proposes to prepare a thorough, reasoned, and legally defensible EIR that fully analyzes and discloses any and all impacts associated with the proposed Project.
\'!7 329
Kimley>>Horn Page 2
STRONG, COMMITTED PROJECT MANAGEMENT. Project manager Kari Cano has more than 19 years of experience in the analysis of recreational, industrial, commercial, and residential projects in the counties of Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, San Diego, and San Joaquin. Kari has prepared and reviewed countless Initial Studies (IS), Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), and EIRs for CEQA compliance, thoroughness of the document, and overall legal defensibility. Kari is supported by principal- in-charge Jessie Barkley, who brings more than 22 years of experience in the environmental compliance and permitting of major infrastructure and land development projects. Jessie has managed and prepared numerous environmental and planning studies for public and private sector clients under CEQ, specializing in the strategic guidance, preparation, and peer review of CEQA documents and regulatory permitting programs. Jessie has also managed a wide range of environmental planning projects, including environmental documents for major infrastructure and land development, air quality and noise studies, community participation programs, highly controversial hillside development, state-of-the-art visual analyses, facility siting and due diligence studies. Kari and Jessie draw on their broad background and understanding of environmental constraints to provide technical and CEQA compliance review and environmental documentation, in addition to research, analysis, and writing. Key industry roles provide them with unique insight into current CEQA and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) case law, professional practice, and regulatory programs affecting the CEQA/NEPA defensibility and project success.

Together, Kari and Jessie provide experienced leadershipin all aspects ofCEQA strategy and environmental documentation and review.

UNPARALLELED KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE. Our proposed project team has hands-on experience working on CEQA/NEPA, EIRs, and other environmental documents for industrial/commercial distribution centers within Los Angeles County and throughout California.

ONGOING COMMITMENT TO CEQA COMPLIANCE AND DEFENSIBILITY. We consider it our responsibility to pose "devil's advocate" challenges to identify and address any potential vulnerabilities to the assumptions, objectives, alternatives, and strategies used in the environmental documentation. As a result, we maintain an excellent record of defensibility on behalf of our clients.

We are proud ofthe work that we have done for local communities within your area, and we look forward to partnering with the City on the J.B. Hunt West Coast Operations Center Project. We are familiar with the City"s development activities and believe that Kimley-Horn has the experience, enthusiasm, and commitment necessary to provide unparalleled EIR preparation services to the City. Should you have any questions about this submittal, please don't hesitate to contact Kari Cano at 951.543.9869 or at [email protected], or Jessie Barkley at 213.793.5445 or at [email protected].

Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
.t-#O,-
Kari Cano
Project Manager
Jessie Barkley
Principal-in-Charge
I I !@@ @ I
330
Kimley>>Horn Page 3
A. APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
Project Approach
Kimley-Horn"s strategy for the planning and environmental process begins with reviewing available project documentation, and reviewing any technical studies that have been prepared for the project.

Building on this, our project team will prepare environmental analyses to create a thorough, complete administrative and technical record upon which new conclusions will be based. Many projects will consider a complex set of issues and concerns while balancing community, business, and public agency interests within the boundaries of the regulatory review process and procedures. Such complexities require creativity, extensive hands-on experience, and a commitment to carefully manage the project to successful completion despite obstacles that may arise. This effort will require active participation and the application of a team approach from start to finish. Our team will facilitate and develop a collaborative process that will result in the successful completion ofthe EIR.

Scope of Services
Kimley-Horn will provide the services specifically set forth below. The following Scope of Services assumes the baseline conditions, Project Description, and approach will not change, once approved by the City. It is also assumed the City will provide one reconciled set of comments for each deliverable, and that the comments will not raise new substantive issues requiring re-analysis.

The Scope of Services detailed below details the tasks necessary to successfully complete CEQA compliance for the proposed Project.

TASK 1 PROJECT INITIATION

1.1 Kick-Off Meeting
This Task includes a Kick-Off Meeting with the City to discuss the CEQA Proiect in greater detail. This initial meeting is a key milestone, which is vital to the Project's success and CEQA compliance. The primary objectives will be to confirm the City's expectations and Project goals, and develop/refine the Project Description. The analysis' parameters, construction details, buildout conditions, scheduling, and overall communications protocol will also be established. Prior to the meeting, Kimley-Horn will distribute a Kick-Off Meeting Agenda and Data Needs Technical Memorandum (TM).

1.2 Data Review and Site Reconnaissance
Kimley-Horn will conduct reconnaissance of the project site and surrounding area. We will review readily available project materials and reference data, including planning and policy documentation from the City and any other agencies affected by the Project. Kimley-Horn will assess whether available information is adequate and complete. The City will be notified if additional information is needed in order to complete the data collection. Data obtained through this task will be foundational to the environmental documentation and incorporated into the analysis, as appropriate. a a ! ffi&
331
Kimley>>Horn Page 4

1.3 Project Description
The project description is a critical component because it is the basis for the environmental analysis. Based on information provided by the City, Kimley-Horn will prepare a Draft Project Description for City review and approval. The Project Description will detail the Project's location, environmental setting, background and history, project characteristics, construction schedule/phasing, and discretionary actions. Exhibits will be prepared to depict the regional and site vicinity and key project components to support the environmental analyses. Kimley-Horn will respond to one reconciled set of comments on the Draft Project Description. We will prepare a "check copy" Project Description and submit to the City for approval prior to finalizing.

1.4 Notice of Preparation
Kimley-Horn will prepare a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the project and submit it to the City for review.

Kimley-Horn will respond to one consolidated set of City comments on the Administrative NOP.

Kimley-Horn will prepare a check copy of the NOP and submit to the City (along with a redline copy of the Administrative NOP) for approval prior to public release. This Task assumes the Project Description will not change and the comments will not raise new substantive issues requiring re-analysis.

1.5 Scoping Meeting
A Public Scoping Meeting will be scheduled during the Notice of Preparation (NOP) public review period to orient the community on CEQA"s intent and review processes, and the environmental issues to be addressed in the EIR. The Public Scoping Meeting will also enable the community to understand the Project and comment on environmental concerns. It is assumed that the City will provide a meeting location and facilitate coordination. Kimley-Horn will provide graphics to supplement a presentation to the public, as appropriate. Following the presentation, the meeting will be devoted to public participation, questions, and comments. Comment forms will be provided for this purpose, and the written comments, along with oral comments, will become a part of the Project record.

Kimley-Horn will prepare all EIR CEQA Notices outlined below. This Scope assumes that Kimley-Horn will be responsible for all distribution, publishing, and posting of any required agency mailing, radius mailing, and newspaper notices. Payment of CDFW fees, if required, are assumed to be paid by the City.

Notice of Preparation (NOP) and
a Notice of Completion (NOC)
Attendance at one (1) public scoping meeting
TASK2-TECHNICALSTUDIES

2.1 Technical Studies/Assessments
Kimley-Horn will prepare the Technical Studies outlined below. This scope assumes each Technical Study will undergo one City review cycle and one reconciled set of City comments will be provided. Additional City review cycles are excluded. Unless otherwise requested by the City, the following technical analyses will be incorporated directly into the CEQA document. 332
Kimley>>Horn Page 5
A) Cultural Resources Assessment
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) will prepare a Cultural Resources Assessment for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The objective of these efforts is to determine whether the Project contains, or could reasonably contain, cultural resources and if the Project would have a significant effect on the environment due to circumstances concerning these resources. This task will be completed or overseen by a cultural resources management professional that meets the Secretary of Interior (501) Professional Qualifications for Archaeology and History.

Efforts include:

Research: Kimley-Horn cultural resources management staff will conduct a cultural resources records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) for the Project area and half-mile buffer to identify any previously recorded cultural resources or previous cultural studies. Staff will submit a Sacred Lands File search request to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to ascertain if any documented sacred lands files are located within the Project area. Staff will additionally review any cultural records or field survey data the landowner or Lead Agency has available. Staff will research geomorphology and land use history through applicable archives and repositories, as well as review historic aerials and topographic maps.

Field Survey: Preliminary research indicates that at least one historic-age (i.e., older than 45 years) building is located in the Project area. Therefore, Kimley-Horn cultural resources management staff will conduct a pedestrian survey of the project area. The pedestrian survey will be conducted via 15-meter transects. This scope accounts for recordation of up to three (3) cultural resources and all isolated finds on the applicable DPR 523 forms. Recordation of cultural resources beyond this amount will necessitate a budget and schedule adjustment. No resources will be collected. This scope accounts for the significance evaluations of recorded cultural resources.

Report: A Cultural Resources Assessment will be produced that will include sections for project description, environmental setting, cultural background, methodology, results, and recommendations. The final report will be submitted to the SCCIC once deemed acceptable and final by the Lead Agency. This scope accounts for up to two (2) rounds of revision.

B) Air Quality Assessment
Kimley-Horn will assess the project specific air quality emissions in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District"s (SCAQMD's) recommended methodologies set forth in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The following tasks will be performed:

Construction Emissions. Kimley-Horn will calculate construction emissions using the latest version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). Emissions will be calculated based on the scope ofthe project, assumptions regarding construction equipment and scheduling, and associated vehicle trips. The air pollutant emissions during construction will be compared to the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Construction-related mitigation will be identified as necessary.

Operational Emissions. Kimley-Horn will quantify emissions associated with the proposed project (i.e., area, energy, and mobile source) related to area sources and local/regional vehicle miles 333
Kimley>>Horn Page 6
traveled. The project's emissions will be compared to the SCAQMD thresholds of significance.

Operational mitigation measures will be identified, if necessary.

Localized Impacts. Localized impacts will be analyzed based upon the SCAQMD"s Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) methodology. Dispersion modeling for LST analysis is not included.

Should dispersion modeling be needed, additional scope, fee, and schedule will be required. Odors will be evaluated qualitatively. Applicable mitigation will be identified, if necessary.

Plan Consistency. Consistency of the project's regional emissions will be evaluated against the SCAQMD"s Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The determination of AQMP consistency is primarily concerned with the long-term influence of a project on air quality in the South Coast Air Basin.

C) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
The analysis will evaluate the project"s potential contribution to cumulative environmental effects of climate change and whether the project would affect the State's ability to achieve established greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals. The analysis will discuss the potential global climate change impacts, the effects of GHG emissions, and GHG emissions regulations in California. The significance of GHG impacts will be determined in comparison to applicable significance thresholds.

GHG Emissions Quantification. Land use data will be reviewed and an inventory of GHG emissions (i.e., nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide) from both direct (i.e., area and mobile sources) and indirect sources (i.e., energy/water consumption and wastewater/solid waste generation) will be prepared. Total GHG emissions from construction activities will be amortized into the GHG emissions inventory. CalEEMod will be used to quantify GHG emissions.

Emissions Assessment and GHG Reduction Plan Consistency. Project-related GHG emissions will be assessed against SCAQMD draft project-level thresholds and consistency with applicable GHG reduction plans including applicable City policies, and other applicable regional/statewide GHG emissions reduction strategies such as the 2022 CARB Scoping Plan and the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Community Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments region.

Applicable mitigation will be identified.

D) Noise and Vibration Assessment
The noise and vibration assessment will quantify both construction and operational noise levels. The analysis will examine whether the project noise would generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of applicable standards. The following outlines our approach:
s Existing Conditions and Regulatory Setting. Noise standards regulating noise impacts will be discussed for land uses on and adjacent to the Project site. A site visit will be conducted, and short-term noise level measurements will be taken along the project area. The noise monitoring survey will be conducted at up to four separate short-term (10-minute) locations. 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2050. Los Angeles, CA 90017 334
Kimley>>Horn Page 7
Construction Noise; Noise impacts from construction sources will be analyzed based on the anticipated equipment to be used, length of a specific construction task, equipment power type (gasoline or diesel engine), horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. The construction noise impacts will be evaluated in terms of maximum levels (Lmax) and hourly equivalent continuous noise levels (Leq) and the frequency of occurrence at adjacent sensitive locations. It is assumed that no nighttime construction activity would be required. Nighttime construction can be analyzed for additional scope and fee.

Vibration. An analysis of construction vibration impacts will be based on the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) vibration analysis guidance. Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of the area, specific construction activities, and Noise Ordinance specifications. ffl Operational Noise. On-site noise generating activities will be addressed and analyzed for potential impacts to the adjacent uses and will be assessed against the City's Land Use Noise and Compatibility Matrix and Noise Ordinance standards. Stationary noise sources will be quantitatively assessed. On- and off-site noise impacts from vehicular traffic will be assessed using the u.s. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). Modeled traffic noise levels and predicted increases for the modeled scenarios will be summarized in the analysis. Roadway traffic noise modeling will be based on roadway volumes and distribution included in the traffic impact analysis. This task assumes roadway segment average daily traffic (ADT) volumes would be provided by the traffic engineer.

Noise and vibration effects during construction and operation will be compared to the applicable significance criteria. Applicable mitigation will be identified, if necessary.

E) Energy Assessment
Kimley-Horn will analyze the energy implications of the project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21100(b)(3) and Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. The analysis will describe, where relevant, the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy caused by a project. The analysis will analyze energy consumption associated with short-term construction activities, long- term operations, buildings, and transportation-related energy during construction and operation.

In addition to building code compliance, other relevant considerations may include, among others, the project's size, location, orientation, equipment use and any renewable energy features that could be incorporated into the project. The effects of the project on local and regional energy supplies and on requirements for additional capacity will also be analyzed.

F) Health Risk Assessment
Per SCAQMD requirements, a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) is warranted when siting any new facilities that have the potential to generate Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) within 1,000 feet of a residence or sensitive use (e.g., residence, school, park, hospital, etc.). The closest sensitive receptors are located approximately 300 feet to the west.

The project would generate TACs during construction and operations. Construction on-road trucks and off-road equipment exhaust as well as operational trucks and on-site equipment would generate 335
Kimley>>Horn Page 8
diesel particulate matter (DPM) (a TAC) within 1,000 feet of existing sensitive receptors. Health risk impacts from potential Construction and operational TACs will be addressed quantitatively to eliminate the need for concern or identify mitigation. The quantitative impact analysis involves the following:

Construction diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions rates will be derived from on- and off-road emissions quantified in the Air Quality Assessment.

Operational TAC sources from on-site truck movements/idling and fueling activities will be quantified based on CARB"s emissions factors, anticipated truck activity, and anticipated fueling activity.

Construction and operational pollutant concentrations will be projected at the nearest sensitive receptors using the u.s. EPA AERMOD dispersion modeling software.

The modeled concentrations will be used to determine the increase in cancer risk, as well as the chronic and acute health impacts due to TAC exposure. The increased cancer risk and health hazard will be calculated following the methodology in the California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines - TheAir Toxics HotSpot Program Guidance Manual forPreparation of Health Risk Assessment.

The assessment will present background information on TACs, health risks, the assumptions and methodology used for the modeling, and the results of the analysis.

G) Biological ResourcesAssessment
Literature/Database Review. Kimley-Horn's subconsultant, ELMT Consulting will review all technical survey reports previously prepared for projects in the area, if available, and any other data from the general vicinity to determine the extent of natural habitats occurring on the site and if special-statusl biological resources are likely to occur on or within the general vicinity of the proposed project site.

A database search of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California listings regarding sensitive biological resources known to occur in the region and vicinity of the site will also be conducted. Additional information sources will be consulted including the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and historic/current aerial photographs, as appropriate, to define the habitat requirements for special-status species potentially occurring on-site. Literature detailing existing wildlife movement corridors and linkages will be reviewed to determine if the proposed project is located within any local or regional wildlife movement corridors.

Field Investigation. Following the literature review, ELMT will systematically survey the project site to document baseline conditions from which to evaluate the sites potential to support special- species, sensitive habitat types, and jurisdictional drainages. The fieldwork will be conducted by As used in this proposal, "special-status" refers to those plant and wildlife species that are federally or State listed, proposed, or candidates; plant species that have been designated a California Native Plant Society Rare Plant Rank; and species that a re designated by the CDFW as fully proteded, species of special concern, or watch list species. m
2€) 336
Kimley>>Horn Page 9
qualified biologists in order to document the presence/absence of special-status biological resources, or to determine the potential for occurrence of such resources that may not be detectable when the literature review is conducted. The location of any special-status biological resources (i.e., plants, plant communities, drainage features, wildlife), if present on-site, will be recorded in the field with a handheld GPS unit. Additionally, all trees within the proposed Project footprint will be recorded.

Additionally, the suitability of the vegetation on and surrounding the proposed project site will be surveyed for its ability to provide suitable avian nesting opportunities. Notes will be taken on all plant and wildlife species observed on-site during the survey. This survey will provide an understanding of the overall project setting and biological resources occurring in the area. This data will be used to devise an appropriate clearance/conservation strategy for implementation of the proposed project.

The habitat assessment does not include focused surveys.

Biological Resources Assessment Report. A report will be prepared that will contain the results of the general field survey, the special-status species surveys, and the jurisdictional delineation. The report will document all plant and wildlife species observed, all habitats occurring on-site, the site's potential to support any special-status species, and will document any jurisdictional drainage features, occurring on or adjacent to the project site. The report will also include a brief analysis of the project impacts to biological resources, if any, and will describe wildlife movement opportunities through the area. The report will also include suggestions for further studies that may be needed prior to development, mitigation measures, and permit requirements, if needed. The report will be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

H) Traffic Impact Assessment
Subtask 1: Project Screening
Kimley-Horn will calculate the number of net daily trips and peak hour trips for the Project based on existing trips and projected trips to be generated by the Project. The Project description provides existing daily trips for the North Parcel (150 daily trips) and South Parcel (710 daily trips). Kimley-Horn will calculate the proposed trip generation using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (2021), and/or data provided by the City or applicant. This task assumes no data collection of existing daily trips at the existing driveways.

The trip generation will determine if a level of service analysis (LOS) or vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis is required for the Project. The Los Angeles County Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines (July 2020) will be used to determine if a LOS analysis is required. The Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CE(2A (December 2018) will be used to determine if a VMT analysis is required. Kimley-Horn will summarize the trip generation and the findings ofthe LOS and VMT screening in a brieftechnical memorandum.

Based on the Project Description, Kimley-Horn assumes both LOS and VMT analyses will be required.

Deliverables. Deliverables will be transmitted electronically unless otherwise noted. s Draft Screening Memorandum in.pdf format
s Final Screening Memorandum in.pdf format
Participation in one meeting with the City
337
Kimley>>Horn Page 10
Subtask2: Transportation ImpactAnalysis
Task2.l: LevelofServiceAnalysis (Non-CEQA)
Kimley-Horn will prepare a LOS analysis for the Project based on the Los Angeles County Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines ("Guidelines") and coordination with the City of South Gate. The analysis will identify level-of-service (LOS) and delay (in seconds per vehicle) at each intersection and primary project driveways for up to seven (7) study intersections. Kimley-Horn will collect weekday morning (7-9 AM)and afternoon (4-6 PM) peak hourturning-movementtraffic counts (including vehicle classification, pedestrians, and bicycles) at up to five (5) intersections. Project trips will be distributed to adjacent roadway segments and study intersections. Weekday peak hour intersection operations will be calculated by developing a traffic operations model for the study area using the latest Synchro software. The analysis will be based upon Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) for the following scenarios:

Existing (2024)
ii Existing plus Proposed Project (2024)
' Cumulative (2035)
Cumulative plus Proposed Project (2035)
For the cumulative scenarios, it is assumed that the City/County will provide the related projects within one mile of the proposed Project toincorporate into the analysis. Additionally, cumulative-year volumes without the Project will be calculated using ambient growth rates determined through discussions with City staff.

Task 2.2: Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis (CE0p)
The City of South Gate has not yet adopted VMT guidelines; therefore, the state's Office of Planning and Research (OPRI Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018) and Los Angeles County, Transportation ImpactAnalysis (TIA) Guidelines (July 2020) will be used to provide guidance for the VMT analysis. Because of the size of the Project and regional significance, travel demand model runs are required to complete the VMT analysis. Kimley-Horn will calculate the Project's VMT (VMT/employee) using the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) base year model. If the Project's VMT/employee exceeds the LA County threshold, it may be determined that the Project has a significant transportation impact.

Kimley-Horn will conduct a VMT analysis for the Project using SCAG travel demand model. This will involve evaluating major land uses separately and presenting them both in aggregate (by major land use type). The resultant analysis will be evaluated against thresholds to make a significant impact determination. The analysis will evaluate the existing with Project scenario. The Project may require transportation demand management (TDM) measures or other VMT mitigation may be necessary.

Kimley-Horn will propose potential TDMs for the Client's review.

Task 2.3: Draft and Final Report
Efforts completed in Task 2.1 and Task 2.2 will be documented in a Traffic Impact Study with graphics as deemed appropriate by Kimley-Horn. Kimley-Horn will prepare and submit an electronic (PDF) copy of the draft report to the Client/City for review. We will address one set of consolidated, non- 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA Me)17 '2,?,- 338
Kimley>>Horn Page 1l
conflicting Client/City comments on the draft report. Ifthe comments require additional analysis or data collection beyond that provided for in this Scope of Services, this work will be considered as an additional service. Kimley-Horn will then prepare and submit an electronic (PDF) copy of the final report to the Client/City.

Draft Traffic Impact Assessment in.pdf format
a FinalTrafficlmpactAssessmentin.pdfformat
Subtask 3: Transportation Noise and Vibration Assessment Kimley-Horn will collect 24-hour roadway segment level traffic volumes at up to four (4) roadway segments. Kimley-Horn will provide existing and future roadway daily traffic volumes on an aerial exhibit of the study area. Future roadway traffic volumes will be determined based on the trip distribution and trip generation identified in coordination with City staff as well as the list of related projects provided by the City.

TASK3 ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTREPORT

3.1 Administrative Draft EIR
Following a determination that the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment or a determination that an EIR is required because of public controversy, and during the NOP mandatory 30-day public review period, Kimley-Horn will initiate preparation of an EIR, which will include the following sections:

I.O Executive Summary
2,O Introduction and Purpose

3.O Project Description

4.O Basis for CumulativeAnalysis: This Task assumes a maximum of 16 hours for consultation with other jurisdictions, including preparation of letters and cumulative projects list.

Environmental Analysis: Kimley-Horn will conduct an analysis to evaluate the Project's potentially significant effects on the environment. The environmental analysis will be based upon readily available data, the Technical Studies identified above, and results from additional research. The significance criteria/thresholds used to evaluate each issue will be identified and patterned after State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. The environmental analysis will consider all Project phases, including planning, acquisition, development, and operation.

The analysis will consider the whole action involved with the proposed Project: on- and off-site, Project- and cumulative-level, direct and indirect, and short-term construction and long-term operational. Explanations will be provided for all thresholds including "No Impact" responses, which will be supported by cited information sources. The environmental analysis will identify and focus on the Project's significant environmental effects as well as environmental issues raised during the scoping process (NOP responses, Public Scoping Meeting, and any other relevant and validinformative I ! I I@ *
339
Kimley>>Horn Page 12
sources). For each significant adverse impact, the environmental analysis will also identify feasible mitigation measures, which could avoid or minimize the impact.

A portion of the Project site is designated as Farmland of Statewide Importance. Kimley-Horn will include an analysis of the conversion of farmland to non-farmland uses. Kimley-Horn will utilize the latest Department of Conservation maps to determine the extent of the boundaries of the Farmland of Statewide Importance. Kimley-Horn will rely on the soils data in the applicant-supplied Geotechnical Report to determine if adequate soils exist on the Project site.

Preliminarily, the Project's key environmental considerations are anticipated to include (at minimum) the following environmental issues:

Aesthetics
s Agricultural Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
a Cultural Resources
a Energy
a Geology and Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
' Hazards & Hazardous Materials
a Land Use & Planning
ffl Noise
N Public Services & Recreation
N Utilities & Service Systems
' Transportation & Circulation
N Tribal Cultural Resources
a Wildfire
Each potentially significant environmental issue area will be addressed in a separate EIR section that will be organized as follows:

Introduction
Regulatory Setting
Environmental Setting
a Impact Thresholds and Significant
Criteria

5.0 0ther CEQA Considerations
a Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a Cumulative Impacts
a Significant Unavoidable Impacts
a References

6.O Alternatives to the ProposedAction: Kimley-Horn will provide an analysis of a "reasonable range" of alternatives, comparing each alternative's impacts in each environmental issue to the Project.

Preliminarily, the range of Alternatives is expected to include the No Project/No Development Alternative and two other Alternatives to be developed through the environmental analysis process in consultation with the City. For each alternative, Kimley-Horn will qualitatively analyze the environmental issues outlined above.

7.O Effects Found Not to be Significant

8.0 0rganizations and Persons Consulted

9.O TechnicalAppendices: The EIR will include approximately 20 exhibits to enhance the written text and clarify the proposed Project environmental impacts. Our in-house graphic design team will create black and white or full-color exhibits as well as covers and dividers for the EIR and Technical Appendices. This Task assumes the City will provide high-resolution base maps and plans.

PI
340
Kimley>>Horn Page 13

3.2 Preparation of Revised Administrative Draft EIR Based on the review by the City, Kimley-Horn will respond to one set of consolidated comments and will prepare a second Administrative Draft EIR (ADEIR). All revisions will be shown in track changes for ease of review.

Following internal review ofthe second ADEIR, Kimley-Horn will revise the document based on comments received from the City and provide a track-changes screencheck document for review. This task assumes that we receive one set of consolidated comments, and subsequent review and comments are limited to review of prior comments. This will consist of responding to City comments on the ADEIR requiring a mixture of substantive corrections and editing, but no new technical studies or site-specific data collection. Revisions to the technical appendices are not anticipated. This task assumes a total of 160 hours to complete.

3.3 PreparationofthePublicReviewDraftEIR
Based on comments received by the City on the Screencheck Draft EIR, Kimley-Horn will prepare the Public Review Draft EIR. Revisions are assumed to be limited to editorial and formatting changes. Kimley-Horn willproducetheDraftEIRfortherequired 45-daypublicreviewperiod.Kimley-HornwillprepareaNotice of Availability for the proposed project. Kimley-Horn will also prepare a Notice of Completion (NOC) for submittal to the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and distribution to the public. This task assumes Kimley-Horn will be responsible for all Draft EIR printing. Kimley-Horn will also be responsible for all mailing and posting of notices associated with the Draft EIR with the exception of newspaper notices. This task also assumes that the City will provide all mailing and radius lists for the noticing.

3.4 Preparation of the Final EIR/Responses to Comments Kimley-Horn will prepare an Administrative Final EIR (AFEIR) in accordance with the applicable requirements contained in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15088 and 15089. The AFEIR will list all agencies, organizations, and individuals who submitted written comments on the Draft EIR during the public review period and provide written responses to those comments. To enhance readability and avoid redundancy, Kimley-Horn will use Master Responses to address frequent and reoccurring comments on the Draft EIR's analysis. Additionally, the AFEIR will contain Errata, which will document minor changes to the Draft EIR text in strikeout-underline format.

The introduction to the AFEIR will document compliance with all CEQA Statutes and Guidelines throughout the CEQA process. It will also provide an index of all changes made to the Draft EIR in response to comments received. The comments and responses will comprise the second section of the AFEIR, where each comment letter will be reproduced and specific responses to each comment will be provided. The third section of the AFEIR will present those pages of the Draft EIR on which changes were made in response to the comments using underlined text for additions and strikeout text for deletions.

Kimley-Horn will respond to City comments on the AFEIR, complete necessary revisions, and prepare the screencheck and Final EIR. This scope assumes no new technical studies or analysis would be required.

Per City direction, the Final EIR will be either: 1) A single, complete document with the complete revised text of the Draft EIR, indicating changes, or 2) A reprinting of only those pages from the Draft EIR on which changes were made, with the changes tracked with underlining and strikethrough, as appropriate. f ! V
'25 341
Kimley>>Horn Page 14
Kimley-Horn will be responsible for all distribution, posting, and noticing for the Final EIR except for newspaper noticing, as appropriate.

Kimley-Horn will prepare the Notice of Determination and provide it to City for filing with the Los Angeles County Clerk's Office within three business days of EIR certification

3.5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
To comply with the CEQA Guidelines Section 21081.6, Kimley-Horn will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for concurrent review with the AFEIR. Kimley-Horn will workwith the City to identify appropriate monitoring steps/procedures and to provide a basis for monitoring such measures during and upon project implementation. The MMRP will be created in a tabular checklist format that indicates those mitigation measures identified in the EIR, the monitoring milestone (at what agency/department responsible for verifying implementation of the measure), and the method of verification (such as documentation or field checks).

The MMRP will be prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. For each mitigation measure contained in the EIR, the MMRP will identify: the party or parties responsible forimplementation (individuals, departments); timeframe and mechanism for monitoring; funding source(s); and monitoring and performance criteria (to measure success of mitigation). The MMRP will be bound separately for use as an independent document for field verification of adequate implementation of mitigation measures and any remedial action necessary to achieve adequate mitigation.

To the extent feasible, Kimley-Horn will tie mitigation measures directly to required authorizations (e.g., grading and building permits, etc.). Revisions will be made to the MMRP as directed by the City following internal review of the AFEIR.

TASK 4 - CEQA PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS

4.1 Project Management and Meetings
Ms. Kari Cano will serve as the project manager responsible for supervision of the Kimley-Horn team and documentation review for compliance with CEQA requirements and guidelines and City CEQA procedures.

Project management responsibilities include task scheduling and assignment, contract administration and accounting, and coordination and communications with the City. Ms. Cano will maintain regular communication regarding the Scope of Work, budget, and schedule, and to disseminate project information in a timely manner.

Ms. Cano will participate in project meetings/conference calls, including the kick-off meeting, and two public hearings (preparation and attendance) for the CEQA document. A maximum of 180 hours (approximately 10 hours per month) is assumed for management, meeting and hearings. Participation in and attendance at additional meetings and/or the need for additional management efforts exceeding the budget allocation will require an amendment or would be billed on a time-and-materials basis. 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 900'l7 )(l 342
Kimley>>Horn Page 15

ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Any services not specifically provided for in the above scope are excluded and could be provided under separate scope and fee if desired.

INFORMATION PROVIDED BYTHE CITY
We shall be entitled to rely on the completeness and accuracy of all information provided by the City or the City's consultants, Architects, Engineers, or representatives. The City shall provide all information requested by Kimley-Horn during the Project, including but not limited to the following:
a Proposed Project Plans (high resolution);
a Completed Construction Questionnaire;
ffl Existing easement documentation;
a Access to the site; and
a Site plan, elevations, landscape plans, etc. necessary to complete the Project submittal. 660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90e5l7 343
Kimley>>Horn
B. WORK SCHEDULE

We will provide our services as expeditiously as practicable with the goal of meeting a mutually agreed upon schedule once all of the City-supplied technical studies have been completed, finalized, and submitted to Kimley-Horn. The below preliminary schedule is provided to generally outline the sequencing of task and approximate durations. This schedule is subject to change based upon further collaboration with the City and any delays caused by factors outside of our control.

Project Kick-Off Week 1
Week 2Kimley-Horn Prepares NOP
Kimley-Horn Prepares Project Description Week 2
City Reviews Administrative NOP Week 3
Kimley-Horn Prepares Check Copy'NOP Week 4
Week 5City Approves Check Copy NOP
Kimley-Horn Completes/Publishes IS/NOP Week 5
Week 6
Kimley-Horn Prepares Technical Studies
Kimley-Horn Prepares Administrative Draft EIR
Kimley-Horn Prepares Check Copy Draft EIR
Kimley-Horn Completes/Publishes Draft EIR
Kimley-Horn Prepares Administrative Final EIR
Weeks 1-16
Weeks 1-24
Week 30
Week 32
Weeks 40-44
Kimley-Horn Prepares Check Copy Final EIR Weeks 49-50 City Approves Check Copy Final EIR Week 51
Kimley-Horn Completes/Publishes Final EIR Week 52
Kimley-Horn Prepares Administrative Findings and SOC Weeks 53-54 City Reviews Administrative Findings and SOC Week 55 Kimley-Horn Completes Findings and SOC
Planning Commission Hearing
Week 56
TBD
Certification Hearing
660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017 344
Kimley>>Horn Page 1 7
C. COST PROPOSAL
345
Kimley>>Horn Page 18
f'm"" rTrNessflna,s'aa"""i"'i;"'4iiiipsu#y
Qi
iatx p
Yti't'it
h'$alys$
:@,,fJp,>,:,l,:r,=yll,m
,,,ro)ei-m'
ppqy .3
Q1%7%$'V,""$a;I7,,."'pJr"o"a-"xRi"a":t=oa"aWi_"">&y"-i
ym-e.t._,orn
Jm,'".,a,.t'"""4%.t:""4"laiAiW-?.a
'ELMT
l'
IQ

3.5 Mitigation
Monitoring and
Reporting Program
2 4 6 S 1,300
Task 4
CEQA Project
Management and
Meetings
20 160 o o o o o o 180 9 58,500

4.1 Project Management
and Meetings
20 160 180 S 58,500
P4i i$QQ4aRakffl ffl a! J, *,,._laa*_4,a*" M i_ a
Subtotal Labor: S27,740 6233,600 SS,200 SI0,575 688,540 64,125 S13,300 97,560 S 395,140 at,, lam__tt AJ' l:"kb_ i ! W
a!
a gm m:tffll hMS!a9 I
Wz"'aa W u '?'aaa"a""a"'Q' "aaa':a""bv+<l-lW_, i
346
Attachment C

REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
AND
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC.

This REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is executed this 22nd day of by and between the CITY OF SOUTH GATE, a California municipal corporation ("City"), and J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., a Georgia corporation ("Developer"). City and Developer may be referred to, individually or collectively, as "Party" or "Parties."

RECIT ALS
A. Developer owns the properties located at 5440, 5532, and 5625 Southern Avenue in the City of South Gate, County of Los Angeles, State of California (collectively, "Property").

B. The Property is comprised of two lots. The "North Parcel" is located at 5625 Southern Avenue (Assessor Parcel Number ("APN"): 6232-010-008) and the "South Parcel" is located immediately to the south at 5440 & 5532 Southern Avenue (APNs 6232-015-003 and 6232-015-009).

C. Developer desires to develop the Property into its regional headquarters, including the (i) demolition of existing improvements and redevelopment of the North Parcel for truck trailer parking and (ii) redevelopment of the South Parcel for office, truck and trailer maintenance, and trailing equipment storage (the "Project"). To that end, on September 26, 2024, Developer filed a development application with the City (Case No. PL25-0128) seeking Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit along with a project description for applicable CEQA review (collectively, the "Development Application"). The Development Application remains pending and has not yet been heard or decided by the City.

D. The City is the lead agency, within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq. ("CEQA"), for purposes of conducting environmental review of the Project, and as such, will prepare the draft and final CEQA documents released for public review and comment, and will review and approve any and all supporting documents using its independent judgment. The City shall distribute such reports and documents to responsible agencies and others, hold public hearings and consider public comments, and consider approval or certification of such reports and other documents as it deems necessary and appropriate in accordance with CEQA.

E. In connection with processing the Project, City will incur certain costs. Developer agrees to reimburse City for costs associated with processing its environmental review under CEQA, including outside consultant costs, and to deposit funds with City as necessary to cover and reimburse City for such costs, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for the purposes set forth herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
01007.0018/858500.4
3'l
347
TERMS

1. Incorporation of Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are incorporated and made a part hereof.

2. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective upon full execution by the Parties ("Effective Date").
3, Developer Responsibility for City Costs. Developer shall reimburse City for the following costs related to review and processing of the Project's environmental review and documentation under CEQA: (1) the fees and costs in preparing, reviewing, certifying, and/or circulating necessary CEQA or environmental reports and documents set forth in the contract executed July 22, 2025 by and between Kimley-Horn and the City ("Consultant Costs") and (2) City administrative fees associated with environmental review under CEQA ("Staff Costs"). Staff Costs shall be calculated as the product of hours worked and an assumed hourly rate of $155.

3.1 After the Effective Date of this Agreement, Developer will (i) make a deposit in coru'iection with the Project's Consultant Costs in the amount of $395,140 (the "CEQA Deposit"), and (ii) make a deposit in coru'iection with the Project's Staff Costs in the amount of $98,785 (the "Staff Deposit"). The CEQA Deposit and the Staff Deposit shall be maintained as separate accounts.

Neither account shall be co-mingled with other City funds. The City shall draw down upon the CEQA Deposit and Staff Deposit to cover the Consultant Costs and Staff Costs, as such costs accrue and become due for payment.

3.2 Interest on Deposit. Neither the CEQA Deposit nor the Staff Deposit shall earn interest.

3.3 Accounting. City shall keep an accounting of the CEQA Deposit, Staff Deposit,andallConsultantCostsandStaffCosts. Uponwrittenrequest,Cityshallprovideanaccount summary of the account to Developer within ten (10) days, which shall include descriptions of the Consultant Costs and Staff Costs, including the date, amount, and the type of activity for which the cost was incurred and, in the context of the Staff Costs, the hours worked by City staff. Failure of City to provide any accounting shall not excuse Developer's duty to perform any act, including the duty to make full and timely deposits required under this Section 3. Developer may question or challenge any Consultant Costs or Staff Costs set forth in the accounting and may appeal same to the City Council.

3.4 Unexpended Funds. Upon the earlier of (1) Developer's abandonment of the Project and withdrawal of its Development Application (with written notice to City); or (2) a final City decision on the Development Application and all related entitlements and expiration of all applicable CEQA appeal periods, the City shall, within thirty (30) days thereafter, determine and return any then-unexpended portion of the CEQA Deposit and Staff Deposit to Developer, without interest, less an amount equal to any eligible Consultant Costs and Staff Costs incurred by the City prior to such notice of abandonment/withdrawal or final City decision and accounted for pursuant to Section 3.3 hereof.

4. City Release; Termination. This Agreement shall terminate five (5) years after the Effective Date unless Developer has outstanding reimbursement obligations to the City at that time 2 01007.0018/858500.4
3,1 348
or City reasonably determines that City will incur additional reimbursable costs after such date, in which event this Agreement will be automatically extended for additional one (1) year terms until Developer has reimbursed all Consultant Costs and Staff Costs.

5. Remedies. In the event of a breach by Developer, City may, in addition to any other remedies, seek to recover the Consultant Costs and Staff Costs plus reasonable attorneys' fees in enforcing this Agreement. This provision will not be interpreted to curtail any of City's remedies at law or equity against Developer for any violation of City's Municipal Code, nor shall it be interpreted as a waiver of any defense of Developer.

6. Conflicts of Interest.

6.1 No Financial Relationship. Developer acknowledges the requirements of Government Code Sections 1090 et seq. ("1090 Laws") and represents and warrants that it has not entered into any financial or transactional relationships or arrangements that would violate the 1090 Laws, nor shall Developer solicit, participate in, or facilitate a violation of the 1090 Laws. By law, the documents required by CEQA must be independently reviewed and approved by City in accordance with its independent judgment. Accordingly, despite any funding mechanism provided in this Agreement, during the existence of the City's contract with the Environmental Consultant (as defined below), and for a period of one (1) year after final resolution of the Development Application, neither Developer, nor any of its representatives, agents or other persons acting on behalf of Developer, shall enter into any financial relationship with the Environmental Consultant or with any City official, employee, or contractor. Nor, during such a period, shall Developer propose to enter into any future relationship with the Environmental Consultant or with any City official, employee, or contractor. This shall not prevent Developer's consulting with Environmental Consultant as permitted by Section 7 of this Agreement.

7. Developer's Rights Concerning Review of Documents. City shall give Developer at least thirty (30) days' notice along with copies of any proposed contract with the Environmental Consultant, drafts of CEQA documents, and related documents so that Developer shall have the opportunity to provide comments or objections thereto, prior to the City finalizing, filing, or otherwise releasing any of the foregoing for public review and cornrnent. The City shall also provide Developer with draft copies of all other reports and studies funded through this Agreement. Developer may discuss issues with the City or its consultants and may make cornrnents orally or in writing. The City shall also use reasonable efforts to permit Developer's review with respect to agendas and staff reports for all open City Council, Planning Commission and other public body meetings at which the Project or related matters are to be considered, and by providing Developer with draft copies thereof prior to or concurrently with the transmission of such documents to the appropriate body. As set forth in Section 6 above, it is expressly understood that the Environmental Consultant is under contract solely with the City. The City is free to disregard the comments of Developer and exercise its independent judgment in making payments to the Environmental Consultant or revising or accepting the Environmental Consultant's and the Technical Consultants' work product, without any liability whatsoever to Developer therefor.

8. No Obligation to Adopt CEQA documents or to Approve Project. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the City to adopt any CEQA documents or take any action related to approval of the Project, the Development Application, or any entitlements or approvals 3 01007.0018/858500.4
349
related to the Project. The City shall use its independent judgment in determining whether to approve the Project, the Development Application, and the Project-related entitlements and approvals, whether to approve draft CEQA documents for circulation, and whether to certify or to not certify CEQA documents. In the event that the City certifies CEQA documents, the City shall use its independent judgment in determining the significance of any impacts, approving any mitigation program, adopting a statement of overriding considerations, or taking any other action. The City shall have no liability to Developer in any manner whatsoever therefor, other than providing the accounting of expenses as provided herein.

9. Assignment. Developer may not assign this Agreement to any other entity unless agreed to in writing by City and upon proof of the financial viability of the successor entity to fulfill the Agreement's obligations in the City's discretion.

10. Relationship between the Parties. The Parties agree that this Agreement does not operate to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture, or agency between City and Developer.

Nothing herein shall be deemed to make Developer an agent of City.

11. Qualification; Authority. Developer warrants that it has the legal capacity to enter into the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed the Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer represents, warrants and covenants to City that (a) such entity is duly formed and authorized to do business in the state of its formation, (b) such person is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of such entity in accordance with authority granted under the organizational documents of such entity, and (c) such entity is bound under the terms of this Agreement.

12. Notices. All notices, demands, invoices, and communications shall be in writing and delivered to the following addresses or such other addresses as the Parties may designate by written notice:

To City:

City of South Gate
8650 California Ave
South Gate, CA 90280
Attn: Gabriel Perez
Community Development Director
Copy to:

City Attorney's Office
City of South Gate
8650 California Ave
South Gate, CA 90280
Attn: Raul Salinas, City Attorney
To Developer:

J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
615 JB Hunt Corporate Dr
Lowell, AR 72745
Attn: Stan Cooper
[email protected]
Copy to:

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory &
Natsis, LLP
865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Attn: Lindsay Tabaian
[email protected]
Depending upon the method of transmittal, notice shall be deemed received as follows: by personal delivery, as of actual receipt; by overnight delivery, as of the day following deposit with a national 01007.0018/858500.4
4 350
overnight carrier; and by U.S. Mail first class postage prepaid, as of 72 hours after deposit in the U.S.

Mail.

13. Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate, or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

14. Construction; References; Captions. It being agreed the Parties or their agents have participated in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either Party. Unless otherwise specified, any term referencing time, days, or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not business days, provided, however that any deadline that falls on a weekend or holiday shall be extended to the next City business day. All references to Developer include all personnel, employees, agents, and contractors of Developer, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement.

All references to City include its elected officials, appointed boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. The captions of the various paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

15. Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

16. Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual right by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

17. Binding Effect. Each and all of the covenants and conditions shall be binding on and shall ensure the benefit of the Parties, and their successors, heirs, personal representatives, or assigns.

This section shall not be construed as an authorization for any Party to assign any right or obligation.

18. No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third-party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

19. Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

20. Consent to Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal action or proceeding brought to interpret or enforce this Agreement, or which in any way arises out of the Parties' activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, shall be filed and prosecuted in the appropriate California State Court in the County of Los Angeles, California. Each Party waives the benefit of any provision of state or federal law providing for a change of venue to any other court or jurisdiction including, without limitation, a change of venue based on the fact that a governmental entity is a party to the action or proceeding, or that a federal right or question is involved or alleged to be involved in the action or proceeding. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing waiver, Developer expressly 5 01007.0018/858500.4
351
waives any right to have venue transferred pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 394.

21. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to this Agreement.

22. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, whether the signatures are originals, facsimiles or electronic. All such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Agreement.

23. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between City and Developer and supersedes any prior oral or written statements or agreements between City and Developer with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.

24. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any litigation or other legal proceeding including, but not limited to, arbitration or mediation between the Parties arising from this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to recover, in addition to any other relief awarded or granted, its reasonable costs and expenses (including attorney's fees) incurred in the proceeding. [signatures on the following page]
6 01007.0018/858500.4
352
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

DEVELOPER: CITY:

J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC.
a Georgia corporation
CITY OF SOUTH GATE, a California
municipal corporation
B7: BY:

Rob Houston, City Manager
ATTEST:

By:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

B7:

Raffl Salinas, City Attorney
7 01007.0018/858500.4
353
Item No. 6
Cil of South Gate
E D For the Regular Meeting of: July 22, 2025
Originating Department: I
Darren Arakawa Rob Houston
SUBJECT: PROPOSEDUSEOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA2025-2026CANNABIS TAX FTJND GRANT PROGRAM ("CTFGP")
PURPOSE: To approve the use of the CTFGP funds in the amount of $100, 000 for overtime and equipment.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider:
a. Authorizing utilization of the 2025-2026 Cannabis Tax fund Grant Program ("CTFGP") Funds in the amount of $100,000 for overtime and equipment; b. Amending the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Law Enforcement Grants Fund Budget by appropriating $16,000 for overtime salaries and $86,000 for equipment; and c. Authorizing the Chief of Police or his designee to execute the CTFGP Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund and no requirement for the City of South Gate ("City") to match the grant funds. The total amount of funding that has been allocated to the City for FY 2025/26 is $100,000.

ANALYSIS: The South Gate Police Department submitted a grant application to the California Highway Patrol Cannabis Tax Fund Grand Program in early 2025. In June 2025, the California Highway Patrol awarded the South Gate Police Department $100,000 for overtime and equipment.

BACKGROTJND: With the passage of Proposition 64, the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act ("AUMA"), California voters mandated the state set aside funding for the California Highway Patrol ("CHP") to award grants to local governments and qualified nonprofit organizations, as described in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 34019(f)(3)(B).

The CTFGP marks an important step toward reducing impaired driving crashes, increasing public awareness surrounding the dangers of impaired driving, and making California's roadways a safer place to travel.

The CHP works closely with state and local agencies and other traffic safety stakeholders to actively address impaired driving. The CHP will consider a variety of factors in determining 354
specific needs for each grant cycle, including opportunities and projects best suited to prevent the loss of life, injuries, and property damage caused by driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs.

The funding provided is appropriated by the California State Controller's Office, and all grants are awarded on a competitive basis, unless otherwise specified within the Request for Application. The CHP may consider an extended project performance period based on need, as determined by the CHP. The awarding of a grant does not guarantee ongoing or future funding.

ATTACHMENT: CTFGP Agreement
355
State of California

DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
GRANT AGREEMENT - Page I
Award Number
23411

1. GRANT TITLE
FY25/26 CTFGP Law Enforcement - South Gate Police Department

2. NAME OF ORGANIZATION/AGENCY
Southgate

3. ORGANIZATION/AGENCYSECTIONTOADMINISTERGRANT
South Gate Police Department

4. PROJECT PERFORMANCE PERIOD
From: 07/01/2025 To: 06/30/2026

5. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER

6. GRANT OPPORTUNITY INFORMATION DESCRIPTION
Law Enforcement grants provide financial assistance to allied agencies for the education, prevention, and the enforcement of laws related to driving under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, including cannabis and cannabis products.

The intent of the program is to educate the public regarding the dangers of impaired driving, enforce impaired driving laws on the roadway, and improve the Organization/Agency's effectiveness through training and development of new strategies.

7. FUNDSALLOCATEDUNDERTHISGRANTAGREEMENTSHALLNOTEXCEED$100,000.00

8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The Grantee agrees to complete the Project, as described in the Project Description. The Grantee's Grant Application, and the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 2, Chapter I 3, Sections 1890.00-1890.27, are hereby incorporated into this Grant Agreement by reference.

The parties hereto agree to comply with the Terms and Conditions of the following attachments:
* Schedule A - Project Description, Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives, and Method of Procedure * Schedule B - Detailed Budget Estimate
* Schedule B-1 - Budget Narrative
We, the officials named below, hereby swear, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above-described Grant Terms and Conditions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Grant Agreement is executed by the parties hereto.

9. APPROV AL SIGNATURES
A. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL OF ORGANIZATION/AGENCY B. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL OF CHP Name: Darren Arakawa Name: Andrew Beasley Phone: (916) 843-4360 Title: Chief of Police Title: Captain Fax: (916) 322-3169 Phone: (323) 563-5408
Address: 8620 California Avenue Address: 601 North 7th Street South Gate, CA 90280 Sacramento, CA 95811
E-Mail: darakawa(a!soaate.oro E-Mail: ABeasleypchp.ca.qov (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
C. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF CHP
Name: M. V. Fojas Phone: (916) 843-3531
Title: Commander Fax: (916) 322-3159
Address: 601 North 7th Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
E-Mail: [email protected]
"10. AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL CONT ACT TO RECEIVE

REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS
Name: Adrian Alcala
Title: Accountant
Phone: (323) 563-5436
Address: 8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
(Signature) (Date)
3 356

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Grantee shall comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 2, Chapter 13 Section 1890, et seq. and all other Terms and Conditions noted in this Grant Agreement. Failure by the Grantee to comply may result in the termination of this Grant Agreement by the California Highway Patrol (hereafter referred to as State). The State will have no obligation to reimburse the Grantee for any additional costs once the Grant Agreement has been terminated.

A. EXECUTION

1. The State (the California Highway Patrol) hereby awards, to the Grantee, the sum of money stated on page one of this Grant Agreement. This funding is awarded to the Grantee to carry out the Project set forth in the Project Description and the terms and conditions set forth in this Grant Agreement.

2. The funding for this Grant Agreement is allocated pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 3401 9(f)(3%B). The Grantee agrees that the State's obligation to pay any sum under this Grant Agreement is contingent upon availability of funds disbursed from the California Cannabis Tax Fund to the State. If there is insufficient funding, the State shall have the option to either: 1 ) terminate this Grant Agreement; whereby, no party shall have any further obligations or liabilities under this Grant Agreement, or 2) negotiate a Grant Agreement Amendment to reduce the grant award and scope of work to be provided under this Grant Agreement.

3. The Grantee is not to commence or proceed with any work in advance of receiving notice that the Grant Agreement is approved. Any work performed by the Grantee in advance of the date of approval by the State shall be deemed volunteer work and will not be reimbursed by the State.

4. The Grantee agrees to provide any additional funding, beyond what the State has agreed to provide, pursuant to this Grant Agreement, and necessary to complete or carry out the Project, as described in this Grant Agreement. Any modification or alteration of this Grant Agreement, as set forth in the Grant Application submitted by the Grantee and on file with the State, must be submitted in writing thirty (30) calendar days in advance to the State for approval.

5. The Grantee agrees to complete the Project within the timeframe indicated in the Project Performance Period, which is on page one of this Grant Agreement.

B. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

1. The Grantee shall submit all reimbursements, progress, performance, and/or other required reports concerning the status of work performed in furtherance of this Grant Agreement on a quarterly basis, or as requested by the State.

2. The Grantee shall provide the State with a final report showing all Project expenditures, which includes all State and any other Project funding expended, within sixty (60) calendar days after completion of this Grant Agreement.

3. The Grantee shall ensure all equipment which is purchased, maintained, operated, and/or developed is available for inspection by the State.

4. Equipment purchased through this Grant Agreement shall be used for the education, prevention, and enforcement of impaired driving laws, unless the Grantee is funding a portion of the purchased price not dedicated to impaired driving and that portion is not part of the Project costs.

Equipment purchased under this Grant Agreement must only be used for approved Project- related purposes, unless otherwise approved by the State in writing.

5. PriortodispositionofequipmentacquiredunderthisGrantAgreement,theGranteeshallnotify the State via e-mail, and by telephone, by calling the California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit at (916) 843-4360. 357

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
C. PROJECTTERMINATION

1. Grantee or the State may terminate this Grant Agreement at any time prior to the commencement of the Project. Once the Project has commenced, this Grant Agreement may only be terminated if the party withdrawing provides thirty (30) calendar days written notice of their intent to withdraw.
a. If by reason of force majeure the performance hereunder is delayed or prevented, then the term end date may be extended by mutual consent for the same amount of time of such delay or prevention. The term "force majeure" shall mean any fire, flood, earthquake, or public disaster, strike, labor dispute or unrest, embargo, riot, war, insurrection or civil unrest, any act of God, any act of legally constituted authority, or any other cause beyond the Grantee's control which would excuse the Grantee's performance as a matter of law. b. Grantee agrees to provide written notice of an event of force majeure under this Grant Agreement within ten (10) calendar days of the commencement of such event, and within ten (10) calendar days after the termination of such event, unless the force majeure prohibits Grantee from reasonably giving notice within this period. Grantee will give such notice at the earliest possible time following the event of force majeure.

2. Any violations of law committed by the Grantee, misrepresentations of Project information by the Grantee to the State, submission of falsified documents by the Grantee to the State, or failure to provide records by the Grantee to the State when requested for audit or site visit purposes may be cause for termination. If the Project is terminated for the reasons described in this paragraph, the State will have no obligation to reimburse the Grantee for any additional costs once the Grant Agreement has been terminated.

3. The State may terminate this Grant Agreement and be relieved of any payments should the Grantee fail to perform the requirements of this Grant Agreement at the time and in the manner herein provided. Furthermore, the Grantee, upon termination, shall return grant funds not expended by the Grantee as of the date of termination.

4. If this Grant Agreement is terminated, the State may choose to exclude the Grantee from future Grant Opportunities.

D. FINANCIAL RECORDS

1. The Grantee agrees the State, or their designated representative, shall have the right to review and to copy all records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Grant Agreement. Grantee agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of five (5) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipuiated or required by law. Grantee agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Furthermore, the Grantee agrees to include a similar right for the State to audit all records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Grant Agreement.

E. HOLD HARMLESS

1. The Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the State, its officials, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all Grantee's staff, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Grant Agreement, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, agency firm, corporation who may be injured or damaged by the Grantee in performance of this Grant Agreement.
358

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
F. NONDISCRIMINATION

1. The Grantee agrees to comply with State and federal laws outlawing discrimination, including, but not limited to, those prohibiting discrimination because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religion, creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (including cancer or genetic characteristics), sexual orientation, political affiliation, position in a labor dispute, age, marital status, and denial of statutorily-required employment- related leave. (GC 12990 [a-f] and CCR, Title 2, Section 8103.) G. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT

1. TheGranteeassurestheStateitcomplieswiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)of1990, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA. (42 u.s.c. 12'101 et seq.) H. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

1. TheGranteeshallcomplywiththerequirementsoftheDrug-FreeWorkplaceActof1990andwill provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations. b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:

The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace.
ii. The person's or Organization/Agency's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace. iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs. iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. c. Every employee who works on the Project will:
i. Receive a copy of the company's drug-free workplace policy statement. ii. Agreetoabidebythetermsofthecompany'sstatementasaconditionof employment on the Grant Agreement.

2. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Grant Agreement, or termination of this Grant Agreement, or both, and Grantee may be ineligible for award of any future Grant Agreements if the department determines that any of the following has occurred:
a. The Grantee has made false certification or violated the certification by failing to carry out the requirements, as noted above. (GC 8350 et seq.)

1. LAWENFORCEMENT AGENCIES

1. All law enforcement Organization/Agency/Agency Grantees shall comply with California law regarding racial profiling. Specifically, law enforcement Organization/Agency/Agency Grantees shall not engage in the act of racial profiling, as defined in California Penal Code Section 13519.4.
359

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

J LABOR CODE/WORKERS' COMPENSATION

1. The Grantee is advised and made aware of the provisions which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions, and Grantee affirms to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Grant Agreement, (refer to Labor Code Section 3700).

K. GRANT APPLICATION INCORPORATION
L The Grantee agrees the Grant Application and any subsequent changes or additions approved or required by the State is hereby incorporated into this Grant Agreement.

L. ST ATE LOBBYING

1. The Grantee is advised that none of the funds provided under this Grant Agreement may be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a state or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any state or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., "grassroots") lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a state official, whose salary is supported by this Grant Agreement, from engaging in direct communications with the state or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary state and/or local practice.

M. REPRESENT ATION AND WARRANTIES

1. The Grantee represents and warrants that:
a. It is validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California, has, or will have the requisite power, authority, licenses, permits, and the like necessary to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and as contemplated in this Grant Agreement, and will, at all times, lawfully conduct its business in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and rules.
b. It is not a party to any Grant Agreement, written or orai, creating obligations that would prevent it from entering into this Grant Agreement or satisfying the terms herein. c. If the Grantee is a Nonprofit Organization/Agency, it will maintain its "Active" status with the California Secretary of State, maintain its "Current" status with the California Attorney General's Registry of Charitable Trusts, and maintain its federal and State of California tax- exempt status. If the Grantee subcontracts with a Nonprofit as part of this Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall ensure the Nonprofit will maintain its "Active" status with the California Secretary of State, maintain its "Current" status with the California Attorney General's Registry of Charitable Trusts, and maintain its federal and State of California tax-exempt status.
d. All of the information in its Grant Application and all materials submitted are true and accurate.

N. AIR OR WATER POLLUTION VIOLATION

1. Under the state laws, the Grantee shall not be: (1 ) in violation of any order or resolution not subject to review promulgated by the State Air Resources Board or an air pollution control district; (2) subject to cease and desist order not subject to review issued pursuant to Section 13301 of the Water Code for violation of waste discharge requirements or discharge prohibitions or (3) finally determined to be in violation of provisions of federal law relating to air or water pollution. 360

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

0. GRANTEE NAME CHANGE

1. Grantee agrees to immediately inform the State, in writing, of any changes to the name of the person within the Organization/Agency/Agency with delegated signing authority.

2. An Amendment is required to change the Grantee's name, as listed on this Grant Agreement. Upon receipt of legal documentation of the name change, the State will process the Amendment. Payment of invoices presented with a new name cannot be paid prior to approval of said Amendment.

P. RESOLUTION

1. A county, city, district, or other local public body shall provide the State with a copy of a resolution, order, motion, or ordinance of the local governing body, which by law, has authority to enter into a Grant Agreement, authorizing execution of the Grant Agreement.

Q. PAYEE DATA RECORD FORM STD. 204

1. This form shall be completed by all non-governmental Grantees.

R. FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT AGENCY TAXPAYER ID FORM

1. This form shall be completed by all Grantees.

S. CONFLICT OF INTEREST

1. This section serves to make the Grantee aware of specific provisions related to current or former state employees. If Grantee has any questions regarding the status of any person rendering services orinvolved with the Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall contact the State (California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit) immediately for clarification.

2. Current State Employees:
a. No officer or employee shall engage in any employment, activity, or enterprise, from which the officer or employee receives compensation or has a financial interest, and which is sponsored or funded by any state agency, unless the employment, activity, or enterprise is required, as a condition of regular state employment. b. No officer or employee shall contract on their own behalf, as an independent Grantee, with any state agency to provide goods or services.

3. Former State Employees:
a. For the two-year period from the date they left state employment, no former state officer or employee may enter into a contract in which they engaged in any of the negotiations, transactions, planning, arrangements, or any part of the decision-making process relevant to this Grant Agreement while employed in any capacity by any state agency. b. For the 1 2-month period from the date they left state employment, no former state officer or employee may enter into a contract with any state agency if they were employed by that state agency in a policy-making position in the same general subject area as the proposed Grant Agreement within the 1 2-month period prior to their leaving state service.

4. The authorized representative of the Grantee Organization/Agency, named within this Grant Agreement, warrants their Organization/Agency and its employees have no personal or financial interest and no present or past employment or activity, which would be incompatible with 361

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
participating in any activity related to this Grant Agreement. For the duration of this Grant Agreement, the Organization/Agency and its employees will not accept any gift, benefit, gratuity or consideration, or begin a personal or financial interest in a party who is associated with this Grant Agreement.

5. The Grantee Organization/Agency and its employees shall not disclose any financial, statistical, personal, technical, media-related, and/or other information or data derived from this Grant Agreement, made available for use by the State, for the purposes of providing services to the State, in conjunction with this Grant Agreement, except as otherwise required by law or explicitly permitted by the State in writing. The Grantee shall immediately advise the State of any person(s) who has access to confidential Project information and intends to disclose that information in violation of this Grant Agreement.

6. The Grantee will not enter into any Grant Agreement or discussions with third parties concerning materials described in paragraph five (5) prior to receiving written confirmation from the State that such third party has a Grant Agreement with the State, similar in nature to this one.

7. The Grantee warrants that only those employees who are authorized and required to use the materials described in paragraph 5 will have access to them.

8. If the Grantee violates any provisions in the above paragraphs, such action by the Grantee shall render this Grant Agreement void.

T. EQUIPMENT-USE TERMS

1. The Grantee agrees any equipment purchased under this Grant Agreement shall be used for impaired driving efforts.

2. Law Enforcement Projects:
a. Oral Fluid Drug Screening Devices and Cannabis/Marijuana Breath Testing Equipment - The Grantee agrees to ensure all personnel using road-side drug testing equipment, including oral fluid drug testing devices and/or cannabis/marijuana breath testing devices, purchased with grant funds from this Grant Agreement, are trained to recognize alcohol and drug impairment.

At a minimum, personnel using these devices should receive Standardized Field Sobriety Testing training. These personnel are also encouraged to attend Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement and Drug Recognition Evaluator training. Prior to using these devices, the Grantee agrees to obtain permission from their local prosecutor's office, establish a policy ensuring appropriate use, and require the staff using these devices to receive appropriate training, which may include training from the manufacturer. This will help ensure the equipment is used appropriately. The Grantee shall advise the State (California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit) of any legal challenges or other items of significance that may affect the use or legal acceptance of these devices.

Additionally, the State may request additional information about the performance of these devices, including information about their use, accuracy, and feedback from personnel using the devices.
b. Law Enforcement Vehicles - The Grantee agrees any law enforcement vehicles purchased with Grant funds, from this Grant Agreement, will be primarily used for the enforcement of driving under the influence laws and/or providing public education, related to the dangers of driving under the influence. Additionally, any vehicle purchased using funds from this Grant Agreement shall comply with all California Vehicle Code and California Code of Regulation requirements. The State may require the Grantee to mark these vehicles with a decal and/or emblem, indicating the vehicle is used for driving under the influence enforcement. 362
Schedule A
Southgate
All grant awards, including any adjustments to requested funding, were made by the Cannabis Grants Unit based on the merits of the Grant Application, scale of operation, and in accordance with the Request for Application (RFA) requirements and associated regulations. As a result, not all Project activities and items detailed in Schedule A are applicable. Refer to Schedule B - Detailed Budget Estimate for approved Budget line items and Project activities. Project activities and items that are not clearly identified/specified in the Grant Agreement must be submitted to and approved by CGU prior to purchase.

Project Description
The South Gate Police Department (SGPD) has seen a steady rise in collisions caused by intoxicated drivers.

This is according to statistical data involving alcohol and drugs since the legalization of marijuana. The SGPD impaired driving enforcement project strategy consists of three points: Training, Education, and enforcement.

The SGPD Project will promote increased public awareness of the dangers of driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, and marijuana. Enforcement of D.U.I. laws per(aining to driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, marijuana, and other associated collision factors will reduce the number of citizens killed or injured in collisions.

Through the SGPD's impaired driving enforcement project, we will enhance public safety and aim to reduce the number of persons killed or injured in collisions involving alcohol, drugs, and marijuana. The SGPD will partner with the Automobile Club Of Southern California to distribute informative safety material to drivers of all ages about the effects of alcohol, drugs, and marijuana on driving. The SGPD will utilize social media and community presentations to heighten awareness. Project funds will be used for D.U.I. saturation patrol overtime salaries and a dedicated D.U.I. enforcement vehicle to carry out enforcement efforts.

The SGPD will also provide police officers the needed training to recognize the signs and symptoms of impairment (SFST, ARIDE, and DRE). Funds will be used to train additional police officers to recognize the signs and symptoms of impairment for DUI investigations. Community outreach can be accomplished through social media outreach to highlight awareness and purchase equipment to support our DUI enforcement and prosecution efforts.

Through the SGPD impaired driving education and enforcement project, police officers will gain proper training and experience in identifying drivers under the influence of alcohol, drugs, and marijuana. By accomplishing this we are able to better serve our communities as we improve public safety.

Problem Statement & Proposed Solution
The South Gate Police Department (SGPD) is facing a significant public safety crisis stemming from an increase in impaired driving incidents and the abuse of cannabis within the community. Between 2020 and 2024, DUI-related collisions accounted for 480 incidents, making up nearly 1 0% of the 5,049 reported collisions in this timeframe. Furthermore, of the 27 fatal collisions recorded during this period, 4 (nearly 1 5%) were directly linked to impaired driving.

Despite a decline in DUI-related collisions in 2024 (80 incidents, down from 138 in 2023), impaired driving continues to be a pressing issue. SGPD's challenges are exacerbated by staffing shortages and high turnover rates, which have necessitated the hiring and training of new officers, many of whom lack experience in identifying and investigating impaired driving. These staffing constraints hinder the department's ability to provide critical training, such as Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) and Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) certifications, and to maintain robust enforcement measures.

In addition, the community is grappling with a rise in cannabis abuse, particularly among juveniles. SGPD has made multiple arrests related to the illegal sale of cannabis vape pens near middle and high schools. These investigations have uncovered links to other criminal activities, such as possession of stolen vehicles and weapons. The increased use of cannabis products among juveniles has resulted in unsafe behaviors, including impaired operation of bicycles, e-bikes, scooters, skateboards, pocket bikes, and vehicles, further endangering public safety.
10 363
Schedule A
This multifaceted issue highlights the urgent need for community education, enhanced officer training, and increased enforcement efforts to address impaired driving and cannabis abuse. Without strategic intervention the safety of SGPD's community will continue to be at risk.

Solution:

Having additional officers on the roadways who can enforce traffic-related matters, with specialized training in DUI investigations, serves as an asset to our community. This increases the number of officers available to handle DUI investigations, facilitating more efficient investigations, thorough documentation through report writing leading to convictions and arrests. It will also promote a heightened awareness of zero-tolerance enforcement for DUI/DUID traffic violations and collisions, enhancing proactive traffic enforcement to reduce DUI/DUID incidents within the SGPD jurisdiction.

The SGPD seeks to enhance its enforcement efforts by utilizing additional officers trained in DUI investigations to compliment the enforcement efforts of the SGPD traffic bureau. SGPD plans to conduct 8 DUI saturation enforcement operations throughout the grant year, specifically targeting impaired drivers to reduce injuries and fatal collisions. These enforcement operations will supplement the existing patrol force and focus on areas within the jurisdiction of SGPD.

Officers assigned to DUI/DUID enforcement will work in two-person teams with enforcement operations primarily taking place during the evening/nighttime hours. SGPD plans to conduct 8 saturation patrols (2 per quarter), each lasting a minimum of 8 hours. These efforts aim to reduce DUI-related deaths and collisions, ultimately improving roadway safety in the community.

Additionally, SGPD seeks funding to acquire a dedicated DUI Enforcement Vehicle to support these efforts.

This vehicle will be a marked "DUI Enforcement" unit equipped to assist officers in locating and apprehending impaired drivers and addressing primary collision factors such as speeding, unsafe turning, and failure to yield. The vehicle will be utilized during enforcement operations to ensure effective and efficient targeting of DUI/DUID incidents and to reduce related collisions and fatalities.

Enforcement and Equipment Needs:
* Enforcement Overtime Salary:
o Conduct 8 DUI saturation patrols, consisting of two officers each on an 8-hour detail.

Equipment:
o Acquire a DUI Enforcement Vehicle to support targeted enforcement efforts.

Through these measures, SGPD aims to improve roadway safety, reduce DUI-related incidents and fatalities and enhance the effectiveness of DUI enforcement within the community.

Performance Measures/Scope of Work
The South Gate Police Department (SGPD) Impaired Driving Enforcement Grant aims to save lives and ensure the long-term benefits of its efforts. By increasing public awareness and implementing targeted enforcement, the SGPD seeks to achieve a IO% reduction in both DUI-related incidents and fatal collisions.

To achieve this goal, the SGPD will conduct 8 DUI enforcement operations throughout the grant year with 2 per quarter (every three months). These operations will focus on identifying and apprehending impaired drivers to reduce injuries and fatalities. Officers involved in these operations will utilize specialized training, including Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) and Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) techniques, to conduct thorough DUI/DUID investigations.

Overtime salaries will support these operations, with each detail involving a single vehicle staffed by two officers to ensure safety and efficiency. These enforcement efforts will primarily occur during nighttime hours or other high-risk periods for impaired driving, with each operation lasting eight hours. The goal is to conduct two enforcement operations per quarter throughout the grant period.

A dedicated marked "DUI Enforcement" vehicle will facilitate these efforts. This vehicle will allow officers to effectively locate and apprehend impaired drivers while addressing key collision factors such as speeding, unsafe turning movements, and failure to yield. By providing officers with the tools necessary for targeted enforcement, the vehicle will enhance the department's ability to reduce DUI-related incidents and fatalities while reinforcing its commitment to community safety. 364
Schedule A
Project Performance Evaluation
The South Gate Police Department (SGPD) will analyze data collected during the grant term to complete a final evaluation in the fourth and final quarter of the project. This evaluation will summarize the grant's accomplishments, challenges, and key activities. It will also include an assessment of whether the goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or, if not achieved, an explanation as to why.

The SGPD will use Crossroads Analytics Software and in-house RMS soffware to track collision and enforcement data. This data will allow for comparisons between the grant year and previous years, helping to identify trends and assess the grant's potential impact. Statistics on DUI arrests, DUI-related traffic collisions, injury-related DUI collisions, and DUI traffic fatalities will also be compiled for quarterly evaluations.

Program Sustainability
The South Gate Police Department (SGPD) is committed to reducing reliance on future grant funding by building sustainable enforcement and prevention capabilities within its traffic division. As staffing levels improve, the department's long-term plan is to fully staff the traffic division with two motor officers, two DUI enforcement vehicles, and eight community service officers. A fully staffed traffic division will enable SGPD to conduct consistent and proactive DUI enforcement efforts without the need for external funding.

With these resources in place, the traffic division will be able to focus on targeted enforcement strategies, such as saturation patrols, sobriety checkpoints, and community outreach programs, ensuring continued efforts to reduce DUI-related incidents and fatalities. Additionally, community service officers will play a crucial role in supporting non-enforcement duties, allowing sworn officers to dedicate more time to DUI enforcement.

The timeline for achieving this objective is directly tied to improvements in staffing levels. As recruitment and retention strategies take effect, the SGPD anticipates incremental progress over the next three to five years.

During this period, the department will prioritize internal training for officers, ensuring they are equipped with the skills necessary to maintain and expand DUI enforcement efforts independently of grant funding.

This transition plan emphasizes self-sufficiency while maintaining a focus on roadway safety, ensuring the community continues to benefit from effective DUI enforcement and prevention measures even in the absence of significant grant support.

Administrative Support
The South Gate Police Department (SGPD) has extensive experience successfully managing various grants, even amidst challenges such as a reduction in police personnel. The department has consistently maintained accurate record-keeping, data entry, and statistical reporting to ensure the success of its grant-funded projects. SGPD has efficiently handled the processing of all financial records and will continue to manage and retain records for the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS), Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) and any other entity we enter into an agreement with.

With a dedicated and motivated staff, the SGPD is well-prepared to undertake the tasks necessary to reduce DUI incidents and enhance public safety within the community. The department's personnel and physical resources are well-suited to implement the project effectively and achieve its objectives. l'7, 365
Schedule B
Detailed Budget Estimate
l"""
Award Number Organization/Agency Total Amount
23411 Southgate $IO0,000.00
Cost Category Line Item Name Total Cost to Grant
Other Direct Costs
DUI/DUID Vehicle decals (Wrap)
DUI/DUID Vehicle outfitting
$4,000.00
$20,000.00
Category Sub-Total $24,000.00
Personnel
DUI Saturation patrol $16,000.00
Category Sub-Total $16,000.00
Equipment
DUI/DUID enforcement vehicle $60,000.00
Category Sub-Total $60,000.00
GrantTotal $IO0,000.00
t'==366
Schedule B-I
Budget Narrative
Southgate
Prior to engaging in grant-funded Saturation Patrols, DUI Checkpoints, or other enforcement activities in areas where the grantee does not have primary traffic jurisdiction, the grantee should consult with the agency having primary traffic jurisdiction.

Other Direct Costs
DUI/DUID Vehicle outfitting
$20,000.00
These funds will be used to outfit the DUI/DUID vehicle with standard equipment such as emergency lights/siren, push bar and gun racks.

DUI/DUID Vehicle decals (Wrap)
$4,000.00
Police decals (wrap) for the DUI/DUID vehicle. Decals will include the messages supporting DUI enforcement along with the logos approved by the cannabis grant unit.

Personnel
DUI Saturation patrol
$16,000.00
Two officers per 8 hour detail for a total of 8 details totals 128 hours at a rate of $125 an hour.

Equipment
DUI/DUID enforcement vehicle
$60,000.00
This cost is to include the purchase of a vehicle used for DUI/DUID enforcement. 367
Signature Page for use by City of South Gate regarding CTFGPAgreement 23411
CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

BY:

Darren Arakawa, Chief of Police
ATTEST:

B7:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY:
'IF. Salinas, City Attorney
t5-368
Item No. 7
10;t2 I JtJl 1 6 2025
' FILED

CITY COUNCIL
AG-ENIDA IE3T[T[,'Jl,
Ciffl Clerk:

For the Regular Meeting of: July 22, 2025
odit Glaze Rob Houston
SUBJECT: APPR VAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES PURPOSE: To historically preserve the events of the City Council Meetings.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City Council will consider:
a. Approving the Special Meeting minutes of June 3, 2025; b. ApprovingtheSpecialandRegularMeetingminutesofJunelO,2025; c. ApprovingtheSpecialMeetingminutesofJunel7,2025;and
d. Approving the Special and Regular Meeting minutes of June 24, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT: None.

ANALYSIS: The minutes are provided to the City Council on the Wednesday prior to their regular business meeting. Amendments should be provided to the City Clerk's Office within 24 hours of a City Council Meeting so that verification of the record and corrections are made accordingly. A revised document will be provided to the City Council prior to the Meeting.

BACKGROUND: The minutes typically describe the events of the meeting and may include a list of attendees, a statement of the issues considered by the participants, and related responses or decisions for the issues.

ATTACHMENTS: City Council Minutes
369

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, JUNE 3, 2025

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
Maria Davila, Mayor called a Special City Council Meeting to order at 6:31 p.m.

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Mayor Maria Davila, Vice Mayor Joshua Barron, Council Member Maria del PilarAvalos, Council Member Gil Hurtado and Council MemberAl Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston

ABSENT/EXCUSED
CLOSF.D SESSION
City Attorney Raul F. Salinas
The Council Members recessed into Closed Session at 6:33 p.m. and reconvened at 9:22 p.m. with All Members of Council present City Manager Houston reported the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency Representation: Rob Houston, City Manager
Unrepresented Employees: Top Management/Department
Directors/Hourly Employees
Employee Organizations: SGMEA, SGPMMA, SGDMA,

SGPMA, SGPOA
On item 1, there was no reportable action taken.

ADJOURNMENT Council Member Avalos unanimously adjourned the meeting at 9:22 p.m. and seconded by Council Member Hurtado.

PASSED and APPROVED on this day of 2025.

ATTEST:

Yodit Glaze, City ClerkMaria Davila, Mayor
370

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2025
CALL TO ORDER Maria Davila, Mayor called a Special City Council Meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.

ROLL CALL Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Mayor Maria Davila, Vice Mayor Joshua Barron, Council Member Maria del Pilar Avalos, Council Member Gil Hurtado and Council Member Al Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston, City Attorney Raul F. Salinas
CLOSED SESSjON The Council Members recessed into Closed Session at 5:45 p.m. and reconvened at 6:57 p.m. withAll Members of Council present City Attorney Salinas reported the following:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING

LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a),
54954.9(b)(3)(C)
a. Jade Tran v. City of South Gate, et al.

Item 1(a) has to do with the storing of a vehicle after Miss Tran was arrested for an outstanding warrant. There's a claim made over damage caused as a result of the storing of that vehicle. On a motion made by Council MemberAvalos and seconded by Council Member Hurtado, and on a vote of 5-0, the City Council authorized the defense of that by the City Attorney.

2. CONFERENCE WITH LAJ30R NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency Representation: Rob Houston, City Manager
Unrepresented Employees: Top Management/ Department Directors/Hourly Employees
Employee Organizations: SGMEA, SGPMMA, SGDMA,

SGPMA, SGPOA
On item 2, the City Council received a presentation by the City Manager involving each of the five employee organizations. Upon completion of that presentation, guidance was given, but there's no reportable action taken.
371
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 10, 2025 ADJOURNMENT Council MemberAvalos unanimously adjourned the meeting at 7:02 p.m. and seconded by Council Member Hurtado.

PASSED and APPROVED on this day of 2025.

ATTEST:

Maria Davila, Mayor Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
372

CITY OF SOUTH GATE

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2025
CALL TO ORDER Maria Davila, Mayor called a Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.

INVOCATION Steve Costley, Director Parks & Recreation pynchophbt.gci,mch JoseDeLaPaz,CityTreasurer
ROLL CALL Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
PRESENT Ma70r Maria Davila, Vice Mayor Joshua Barron, Council Member Maria del Pilar Avalos, Council Member Gil Hurtado and Council Member Al Rios; City Treasurer Jose De La Paz, City Manager Rob Houston, City Attorney Rail F. Salinas

COMMENTS FROM THE

AUDIENCE (NON-AGENDA
{TEMS) Mario Dominguez is requesting the City Council place an item on the agenda to change the email fees, having to do with public records request, specifically Fair Political Practices Coini'nission (FPPC).

Lizette Ruiz, Kauffrnan Ave, thanked the City Council for speaking out and being involved in meetings with different government officials form the state regarding the ICE raids. She also believes the budget item should have been heard earlier in the meeting.

Francisco Gallegos, Otis Street, is concerned about the illegal fireworks in this community,
Rubin Pichardo, long-time South Gate resident, is present tonight to clarify certain comments made by Vice Mayor Barron.

Javier, South Gate resident, is asking for clarification on the city's stance regarding ICE.

Osvaldo Pichardo, San Gabriel Ave, is present tonight to clarify comments made by Vice Mayor Barron and Council Member Hurtado.

Alice, South Gate resident, is concerned that people show up at Council Meetings and are accusing the current City Council Members of fraud.

Her complaint is with the Parks Department because she cannot attend the weight control meetings because they are only in Spanish. 373
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 10, 2025

COMMENTS FROM THE

AUDIENCE (NON-AGENDA
ITEMS) CONT'D Cecilia Caballero, South Gate resident, owns a company for multilingual books for children. She mentioned a literacy festival for this summer. She received a call from a good friend that was planning a pride festival but got turned down. She's present tonight supporting him.

Adolfo Varas, South Gate resident, was a keynote speaker at a graduation in the City of Bell. He stated it took him five years to advocate for his LGBTQ+ comi'nunity to declare the month of June as Pride Month. He stated establishing a Pride Festival that shows unity, love, education, and resources. He thanked Councilwoman Avalos and eveiy elected official throughout the southeast Los Angeles region, multiple different cities reaching out, wanting his Pride Festival. He hopes the City Clerk will read the emails and not give a suinmary. He is asking the City Council to coritinue supporting the LGBTQ+ cominunity.

Laura thanked everyone for their support. She is the Membership Director for the City of Bell Chamber of Coinmerce. She stated the Pride Festival is to provide resources for the youth that do not have anywhere to go.

Vince, SELA Pride Festiva Chair, and resident of the cities of San Pedro and Paramount. He stated his first Pride Festival was hosted in the City of South Gate.

Miguel Angel Alvarez Godinez, LA County Commissioner on HIV, and is present tonight in support of the SELA Pride Festival. He would like this city to support its citizens.

Ezequiel Flores, South Gate resident, and reiterated what his other colleagues have stated.

EMAILS Ed Rod expressing disappointment with the City of South Gate's decision to withdraw from participating in the SELA Pride. He is urging the city to consider its decision, stating that pulling back sends a harmful message, especially to the youth.

Tenaya, South Gate resident and SELA Pride attendee, is expressing concern about the city's recent decision to withdraw from hosting this year's pride event. She emphasized South Gate needs pride celebration to support its peer residents and allies.

Sophie Ryan, South Gate resident, expresses appreciation for the city's ongoing efforts to be a safe and inclusive space and special thanks to Mr.

Costley for his long-standing support and student events over the past decades. Ms. Ryan is asking Council to review the proposal and consider the possibility of hosting the event this summer.

374
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JtJNE 10, 2025

COMMENTS FROM THE

AUDIENCE (NON-AGENDA
ITEMS) CONT'D EMAILS Miss Ady Cortez in response to a social media post by Adolfo Varas regarding the city's involvement in the SELA Pride Festival. She states that one of Mr. Vara's staff members dropped off the event application on Wednesday, June 4I'l and later reviewed and corrected by her mother before being submitted on Thursday, June 5'll. She added that he had previously been informed that the application should have been submitted 3 to 6 months prior to the event. She concluded by saying it is unfair to spread misinfon'nation and that doing so reflects poorly on the LGBTQ coininunity,
Miss Jennifer Daly, on behalf of Ruben Pichardo and several concerned residents regarding the city's code enforcement practices, alleging that South Gate residents are being unfairly cited for minor or unfounded violations while large coininercial entities are allowed to operate without proper permits or enforcement.

Miss Martha Torres, Comi'nunity Engagement Liaison with the Fair Housing Foundation, informing the city about the free services the organization provides to South Gate residents.

REPORTS AND COMMENTS
FROM CITY OFFICIALS Rob Houston, City Manager stated that regarding the city's support of pride community and Pride Festival, the city has a history from both City Council and staff to support the coinrnunity and has had past pride festivals. He stated the city has a set of rules and regulations to make sure all the community members want to do events in the park.

Mayor Davila stated the City of South Gate was the first to have the Pride Festival during Covid. She stated there is a process and regulations that need to be followed.

Mayor Davila stated she has LGBTQ family members and is a big supporter of the LGBTQ community. She also infonned the public that the Proclamation for Pride Month is at the next Council Meeting.

Arturo Cervantes, Director of Public Works, reported construction on the residential resurfacing project.

Steve Costley, Director of Parks & Recreation, stated the park is very busy. He mentioned the registration for classes has started for the summer quarter.

Gabriel Perez, Director of Community Development, stated staff is working on a fagade improvement program for Tweedy Boulevard.

1 375
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 10, 2025 RF.PORTS AND COMMENTS

FROM CITY OFFICIALS
CONT'D Luis Frausto, Director of Administrative Services, stated that for a couple of meetings we have had technical issues with the streaming services.

Staff take this very seriously and have resources that have been dedicated to troubleshooting and ensuring the coru'iection was stable.

Jon Hamilton, Director of Human Resources, has nothing to report. He wished everybody Happy Father's Day.

DarrenArakawa, Chief of Police, stated there isn't a real solution to the fireworks. He agrees staff is an issue. He mentioned the citation fees. He mentioned the street fair was well attended without any issues.

The Chief was on a conference call regarding iinmigration with the LAPD Chief and Sheriff with the 45 Police Chiefs about what we are doing locally within the communities. He has a profound respect for the law. It is agreed in law enforcement that there is a big gap in coinmunication with the federal government. The Chief stated that the federal goveinrnent does not need anyone's permission to come into the com+'nunity. There is no mandate that they community with the cities.

Rob Houston, City Manager stated everyone has the right for peaceful protesting that's encouraged in our democratic society and supported by the police, council and staff. But if the protesting creates vandalism or aggression that will be addressed like any other law.

Rail F. Salinas, City Attorney had nothing to report.

Jose De La Paz, City Treasurer, will save his time on the proposed budget item.

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk, spoke on the summarized email comments. She also spoke on the fee resolution Mr. Dominguez brought up. She wished everybody a Happy Father's Day.

Council MemberAvalos thanked the coinmunity and appreciated the compliments by the Pichardo family. She acla'iowledges the South Gate families that are afraid to leave their homes, go to work, take their children to school or the park. She's made a few social media posts if anyone needs resources, to reach out to her.

Council MemberAvalos attended the Southeast Water Coalition and on April 9I'l it was indicated the water rates were going to increase by 4%.

The Budget Advisory Coinmittee indicated that it was not needed. The water increased by 3.8. She also attended the Men's Health, but a lot of the community leaders did not attend, and she understands the reason. She wished all the fathers a Happy Father's Day.