South Lake Tahoe City Council
March 15, 2022

Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
March 15, 2022

DECLARING SURPLUS LAND INVENTORY

BACKGROUND
A. Under the Surplus Land Act (“SLA”), Government Code Sections 54220-54234, surplus property is defined as land owned by any local agency no longer necessary for the agency’s use.

B. Effective January 1, 2020, the SLA was amended to add requirements that local agencies must comply with prior to selling or leasing agency-owned property; and in April 2021, the California Department of Housing and Community Development adopted SLA Guidelines to implement and interpret the SLA. One of the requirements is to formally declare publicly owned property no longer necessary for the agency’s use as surplus land and report this inventory of surplus land to HCD.

C. The City and South Lake Tahoe Successor Agency owns twenty-one (21) properties located throughout the City, listed in Exhibit A, that are suitable for future disposition and development (the “Surplus Properties”); thirteen (13) of which qualify as “exempt surplus land” that need not follow certain notice and negotiation requirements prior to disposition.

D. The City intends to follow the provisions of the SLA in the disposition of public lands.

E. A declaration of surplus land and exempt surplus land, and the issuing of notices pursuant to the SLA for surplus land, is a process adopted in State law with the intent of ensuring the prioritization of affordable housing, including noticing and opportunity to respond, for affordable housing developers.

F. This declaration of surplus land and exempt surplus land does not obligate the City to subsequently dispose of the land and, depending on the response to the notices and other factors, the City could still decide not to move forward with disposition of specific properties.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Finds that the surplus properties and exempt surplus properties listed on Exhibit A are no longer necessary for the City’s use, which findings are set forth in Exhibit A to this Resolution.

2. Finds and determines that this action results in no binding commitment by the City to authorize or advance the disposition of any of the surplus properties or exempt surplus properties; will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment; and does not constitute an “approval” of a “project” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15004 and 15352.

3. Authorizes the City Manager to issue Notices of Availability for the surplus properties that are compliant with the State SLA.
508
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15,
2022

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on March 15, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:___________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
________________________ Date:___________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
509
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 3 of 3

EXHIBIT A
510
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Agenda Item #: 14
Agenda Item: Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Mid-Year Budget Review, Amendments to the Allocated Permanent Position Listing, and Five Year Financial Plan Update Executive Summary: The annual mid-year budget review is an essential element in maintaining the City's financial stability. It provides the City Council an opportunity to review the General Fund and other funds, adjust amount in order to achieve a more accurate budget for the current fiscal year and help shape the development of next year's budget.

The Five-Year Financial Plan update provides a forecast of revenues and expenditures over the five-year period of fiscal year 2022-2023 through 2026-2027. The Five-Year Financial Plan provides a multi-year view of the financial picture and allows for strategic discussions and planning needed to balance the General Fund Budget and address City Council Strategic Plan 2021-2026 ensuring the City's financial sustainability in providing the community with core services, infrastructure and facilities improvements.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving FY 2021-2022 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments and Amendments to the Allocated Permanent Position Listing for Changes Made during Mid-Year.

Responsible Staff Members: Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance and Joseph Irvin, City Manager Responsible Staff Member: Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance (530)542-7431 Joseph Irvin, City Manager (530)542-6043
Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Mid-Year Budget and Five-Year Financial Plan.docx 02-Resolution- Mid-year Budget 2021-2022.docx
03-Position Allocation 21-22 Budget (Exh. A to Reso).pdf 04-Salary Tables for Resolution_eff 4.02.22 (Exh. B to Reso).pdf 05-5yr Finacial Plan & Assumptions as of March 2022.pdf 06-CalPERS Circular Letter 200-006-22.pdf
511
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 8
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Title: FY 2021-22 Mid-Year Budget Review and Five-Year Financial Plan Update Location: All Departments
Responsible Staff Members: Joseph Irvin, City Manager
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Background: The annual Mid-Year budget review is an essential element in maintaining the City’s financial stability. It provides the City Council an opportunity to make adjustments and operational corrections based on unanticipated changes and the goals and priorities of the City Council for the current fiscal year and helps shape the development of next year’s budget.

During the mid-year process the City Manager and staff review the City’s fiscal condition and make recommendations to amend appropriations if necessary. The budget amendments recommended by staff are intended to address unanticipated items or events that may have occurred in the first half of the fiscal year. The proposed amendments also include adjustments due to reorganizational changes to staffing needed to address goals and initiatives included in the Strategic Plan adopted by the City Council on March 2, 2021.

Based on recommendations from financial experts and the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) indicating the need for public agencies to conduct long-term financial planning, since 2011 the City has been annually producing a Five-Year Financial Forecast to provide the public and the City Council with information from which to consider financial and policy recommendations.

In preparing the financial forecast, the City considers a wide variety of economic indicators to estimate revenues and expenditures over the five-year period. This multi-year examination of the City’s financial outlook allows for strategic discussions and planning ensuring the financial stability of the City. Financial stability allows the City to provide the community with core services, infrastructure and facility improvements, and address City Council Strategic Priorities.

Issue and Discussion: As part of the Mid-year Budget review it is important to assess economic conditions at national, state and local levels to ascertain what effects these may have on the City’s revenues and expenses.

The U.S. economic recovery from COVID-19 has been steady but highly dependent on and influenced by a series of rapidly changing factors involving new waves of COVID-19 infections, labor market challenges, supply-chain constraints, rising inflations, and international politics. The GDP grew 5.7% in 2021 after decreasing 3.4% in 2020. This growth combined with global supply chain constraints, has pushed inflation higher than expected, 7% year-over-year at the start of 512
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 2 of 8
2022. Consumer prices were 7.5% higher in January 2022 than in January 2021, the largest 12- month change in 40 years. The national unemployment rate was just 3.9% at the end of 2021, down from 6.4% at the start of the year. California’s economy suffered more during the pandemic, as some speculated, due to stricter anti-COVID-19 mandates than in other states.

The economy is recovering but the unemployment rate continues to be elevated at 6.5% in December 2021. Labor supply issues continue to be the biggest constraint on employment expansion. The unemployment rate for South Lake Tahoe was 5.2% in December 2021.

Forecast by economists for 2022 shows that the economic recovery will continue, but high inflation could spark rising interest rates and falling home prices, with an increasing likelihood of recession – possibly at the end of 2022 or even the start of 2023.

The City has been challenged by most of the same factors as at the state and national levels while dealing with its own challenges caused by fires, evacuation, impacts of snow storms and elevated housing prices. In the past two years, the COVID-19 crisis had a significant impact on the City operations. The vast portion of staff time and effort was shifted away from the implementation of City Council Strategic Priorities. Nevertheless, staff put in an extensive effort to continue working on those priorities making significant progress on many of them as evidenced from the City Manager’s report.

Five Year Financial Plan Update
The Five-Year Financial Plan Update analyzes major know fiscal conditions and projected future conditions to support informed long-term planning and decision making regarding operational and capital improvement resources.

The Plan is focused on the City’s General Fund and provides an updated forecast of revenues and expenditures over the five-year period from fiscal year 2022-23 through 2026-

27. Key highlights of this Five-Year Financial Plan update include:
 Revenues are forecasted based on current economic trends and estimates. o In 2022-2023, two of the City’s major revenues (Property tax and sales tax) are projected to exceed 2019 pre-COVID levels by approximately $2.0m in total. o City TOT projection includes an estimated loss of $1m due to Measure T VHR ban.
o The plan assumes the usage of approximately $1.2m in FY 2023 (increasing 3% moving forward) from Measure S sales tax fund to pay for seven Firefighters previously funded by the SAFER grant and 50% of the Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal position.
o Parks and Recreation Revenues were reduced in FY 2022 and 2023 due to the Rec. Center closure and reduced campground occupancy.
o The plan assumes an early pay-off of the parking garage bonds and possible transfer of $850K of projected available revenue into the General Fund starting in FY 2024.
 Expenditures:
513
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 3 of 8
o Majority of personnel and operating expenditures are projected to increase between 2% and 3% annually.
o FY 2022 personnel cost includes one extra pay period which occurs approximately every 7-8 years.
o Approved to date one-time large capital expenditures are removed moving forward.
o No major capital expenditures, such as road rehabilitation or vehicle replacement, are included in the main General Fund due to projected funding by Measure S sales tax general fund starting in FY 2022. o Pension cost assumes a prepayment of CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) annually in July, saving the City approximately $200K. o Projected 2022-23 and forward includes the cost of the proposed with mid-year two unfrozen Maintenance Technician positions.

The table below presents a summary of the General Fund Five-Year Financial Plan update as of March 2022. The 2021-2022 amended budget reflects the use of $3.4 million from undesignated excess reserves, before mid-year adjustments. At September 30, 2021, the undesignated excess reserves amounted to $10.5 million, excluding the required 25% reserve of $12.0 million for FY 2022.

The preliminary estimates for FY 2022-2023, that include assumptions previously listed in the Key Highlights section, indicate the General Fund deficit of $1.1 million for the upcoming budget year. Fast growing personnel cost contributes to on-going deficit, absorbing projected revenue increases.

Finance department will begin the next fiscal year budget process in April 2022 and will make every effort to reduce and eliminate the FY 2022-2023 projected deficit. Staff will continue examining various, creative ways to achieve the balanced budget in the upcoming years while continue implementing the City Council Strategic Priorities.

Measure S Sales Tax General Fund Five-Year Projections
Measure S sales tax is projected to generate between $6.5m and $6.8m annually for the next five years. The preliminary projected uses for FY 2023 include:
 $555K for communications system financing and $32K for the system extended warranty;
 $2.2m total for Fire Station II Rehabilitation and Staffing, including 50% for Fire Marshal position;
Actual Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 Rev. $50,151,246 $48,374,759 $47,916,204 $49,808,624 $51,373,954 $52,145,912 $52,926,008 Exp. $46,743,733 $51,803,571 $49,049,418 $50,758,523 $52,138,612 $53,733,587 $53,899,362 Net Rev/(Exp) $ 3,407,513 $ (3,428,812) $ (1,133,214) $ (949,899) $ (764,658) $ (1,587,674) $ (973,354) General Fund Net Revenue
514
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 4 of 8
 $3.7m total for road rehabilitation, vehicle and equipment purchase, and stormwater management program.

Attachment 05 provides a detailed analysis of the primary General Fund revenues by type and expenditures by department, and Measure S Sales Tax general fund revenues and financing uses through FY 2027.

Mid-Year Budget Review
2021-2022 mid-year budget adjustments include the proposed usage of the City’s FY 20/21 net revenues. The General Fund ended the year with undesignated excess reserves of $10.5 million. Since the FY 21/22 budget adoption, additional appropriations, including a net of grant match set-aside of approximately $1.7 million, brought the balance to approximately $6.6 million as of February 15th. This amount is available for spending at the City Council discretion.

Staff proposes the following adjustments that net approximately $3.1 million in expense for the General fund.

General Fund Revenue Adjustments recommendations include the following:

Golf Course Revenues +$150,000 due to a planned re-opening of the Golf Course. This increase in revenue is partially offset by corresponding increase in golf course operating expense.

Special Events Revenues -$74,000 due to termination of the special event agreement for SnowGlobe music festival.

Reimbursable Overtime +$230,000 for Fire Department due to participation in mutual aid fires during the late summer and early fall 2021.

Transfer in from Prop 172 Public Safety Sales tax +$8,000 for the Police department purchase of network equipment.

Transfer in from Local Fiscal Recovery Fund +$377,500 from unallocated balance of the first tranche of ARPA funding towards COVID-19 Small Business Sustainability (SBS) loan. More details provided later in this report.

General Fund Expenditure Adjustments recommendations include the following:

Personnel Needs:
 +$54,000 – Net increase to Overtime budgets for Police, Motor Pool and IT due to vacancies, injuries and increased operational needs.
 +$85,320 – Retirement pay-outs in Police and additional ICMA contributions due to budgeting error.
 +$40,000 – Personnel cost for the Golf Course reopening.  +$101,157 – Increase to CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) prepayment budget based on actuarial reports received in August 2021.

Operational Needs:
515
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 5 of 8
 +$125,000 – Litigation Settlement previously approved by City Council.  +$110,000 – Projected increase in Liability Insurance premium.  +$150,000 – South Shore Transportation Management Association (SSTMA) pilot program.
 +$35,000 – Annexation Study
 +$38,000 – General Government and IT various needs including attendance of the Climate Sustainability Summit and a purchase of the project management software.
 +$95,000 – Police department various needs including helmets, software purchases, and equipment.
 +$18,850 – Fire department various needs including executive management training for senior staff.
 +$30,667 – Public Works various needs such as a replacement of furnace units at Motor Pool and an electric air dryer for failed HVAC unit at Recreation Center.  +$11,780 – Development Services department small equipment and computer needs.
 +$175,050 – Parks and Recreation various needs including operating expense budget for the reopening of the Golf Course, contribution to the Community Playfield Consortium (CPC) sinking fund, an increase in electricity cost, budget for 4th of July parade and multi-cultural festival.
 +$800,000 – Transfer out to TOT Trust fund for Successor Agency debt service due to reduced RPTTF revenue resulted from one-time retroactive adjustment for unsold Marriott timeshares and to replenish fund for future RPTTF shortages.  +$135,000 – Transfer out to VHR and Ice Arena accounts to cover FY 20/21 operating net expense.

CIP Requests:
 +$250,000 – Stormwater pipe replacement project.
 +$250,000 – Multi-purpose tractor and accessories for snow removal operations and landscape and site maintenance for the Airport facilities and grounds.  +$200,000 – Conditions Assessment Study for City Facilities.  +$150,000 – James and Eloise Drainage Replacement Project phase II.  +$150,000 – City’s Services Center and Public Works offices backup power.  +$75,000 – Replacement of the Police Department roof and mansard.  +$75,000 – Structural design and repair of structural damage and roof replacement at TTD facilities.
 +$70,000 – To repair winter storm damages at the Ice Arena and to replace existing water heaters.
 +$50,000 – For mitigating localized flooding and constructing drainage improvements specific to discussion with the public during the December winter storms.
 +$50,000 – City-wide miscellaneous traffic safety projects.  +$50,000 – City-wide miscellaneous maintenance needs including roof repairs, minor equipment replacement and other repairs that don’t qualify as stand-alone CIP projects.
 +$32,110 – Transfer to the Airport for a study on relocating a future PAPI identifying tree removal and tops trimmed.
516
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 6 of 8
Public Works Reorganizational changes: The proposed reorganizational changes will closer align City staffing with the adopted City council priorities and goals for the next 5 years. The costs reflect 5- or 6 months cost, on-going thereafter. All changes described in this section are reflected in the attached Allocated Permanent Position Listing. The reclass changes are proposed to take effect on April 2nd.  Unfreezing two (2) Maintenance Technician (MT) positions – one for Facilities and one for Streets/Snow Removal divisions. The cost increase to the general fund in the current year for 5 months is approximately $37.3K for one position. The cost for the second MT position is funded from the available fund balance in the Streets fund for the remainder of the current fiscal year. Starting next fiscal year, 25 percent of one of the unfrozen positions will be funded by the State snow removal reimbursement. The total annual cost to the City’s general fund for two positions in the first full year is approximately $157K and will grow at a rate of 5-7 percent per year  Reclassification of Capital Improvement Projects Manager to Capital Program and Facilities Program Manager - $4.4K for six months.
 Reclassification of Stormwater Program Coordinator to Complete Streets Program Manager - $6.5K for six months.
 Airport Manger salary realignment within the department - $6.6K for six months; in FY 21/22 funded from available Airport fund balance.
 Various internal promotions of experienced Maintenance Technicians in Streets division - $5.2K funded from available fund balance in the Streets fund.

Measure S Sales Tax General Fund Revenue and Expense Adjustments $55,350 increase in Revenue. The projected amount is calculated based current trends and a three-year Measure Q receipts average. The new sales tax rate went into effect on April 1, 2021.
$52,520 increase in Expense for the transfer out to Fire Communication system CIP project for the shortage of the original project cost revenue coverage.

Cannabis Grant Program
The Cannabis Revenue Grant Program process and guidelines are presented to the City Council on March 15th, 2022. The City will solicit proposals for funding from local schools, government agencies and non-profit organizations with programs and projects designed to mitigate potential impacts of the cannabis industry in South Lake Tahoe. According to the Cannabis Community Benefit Fee Revenue Allocation Policy, that states that City Council will allocate up to 50 percent of the previous year’s revenue to the new Community-wide Benefit Grant Program during a mid-year budget process, staff has proposed to appropriate $400,000 to be made available for the cannabis revenue grant program for this fiscal year.

The total Cannabis Development Agreement revenue collected in the previous fiscal year 2020/2021 was $1,177,868. The expenditures totaled $619,709 and included $200,000 Contributions to the Boys and Girls Club of South Lake Tahoe approved by City Council on May 18, 2021.
517
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 7 of 8
$400,000 increase in Expense for appropriations towards Cannabis Revenue Grant Program for FY21/22.

COVID-19 Small Business Sustainability Loans Forgiveness On March 1st, 2022 City Council passed a motion to implement loan forgiveness for 52 COVID-19 Small Business Sustainability (SBS) Loans approved in January 2021. The loans were issued to assist eligible small businesses, many of which were forced to shut down or had limited operations for an extensive period during 2020, experienced a significant loss of revenues, a reduction in workforce, and that received little to no financial assistance during the pandemic, to continue operations and grow beyond the pandemic. The proposed funding source for expending the loan cost is a portion of unallocated first tranche of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding.
$377,500 increase in Revenue and Transfers Out to appropriate a portion of the ARPA funding into revenue account and transfer out to the General fund towards the extinguishment of the outstanding 52 COVID-19 SBS loans receivable.

Other Non-General Fund Programs
Special Revenue Funds
 Increases in various funds and expense line items that will either use their available fund balances or require general fund contribution and were listed above. This includes a transfer out of $800,000 from the TOT Trust fund to the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund described earlier in this report.

CIP
 Increase in various CIP revenues and expenses. These CIP projects are funded by transfers from the General Fund and Measure S General Fund as described earlier in this report.

Enterprise Funds
 Addition of $357,110 in revenue and $457,050 in expense budget. The funding source for Revenue is transfers in from the General Fund.

Internal Service Fund
 $6,550 increase to expense due to an increased OSIP annual insurance.

Trust and Agency Fund
 $800,000 increase to revenues due to a one-time and anticipated ongoing RPTTF revenue reduction to the Successor Agency for the redevelopment bonds debt service.
518
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 8 of 8
Financial Implications:

At September 30, 2022, the FY 2021-22 current budget is projected to have a year-end deficit of $3.4m. The recommended mid-year budget adjustments will result in an increase of $3.1m in the deficit. Sufficient September 30, 2021 ending fund balance of $10.5m is available to cover the budget deficit. After adjustments for grant match set-aside and the proposed midyear budget adjustments, the ending General Fund undesignated excess reserves balance is expected to be approximately $3.5m.

Completion of the 2021-2022 mid-year budget process will ensure continued operations through the end of the fiscal year and will allow City staff to continue the implementation of the City Council priorities.

The General Fund Five-Year Financial Plan update represents an analysis of the economic factors driving the City’s revenues base, specific revenue sources available to the City, and the projected known obligations at the time of the plan update preparation. Multi-Year Financial Planning is required as part of the City’s Financial Policies (Financial Planning) and is an essential tool for developing the budget guidelines and for evaluating the future impact of current year decisions.

Policy Implications:

Compliance with City Financial Policies: Budget Management, Section E and Financial Planning, Section B.
519
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 3
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
March 15, 2022
Approving FY 2021-2022 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments and
Amendments to the Allocated Permanent Position Listing
for Changes Made During Mid-Year

BACKGROUND
A. The Mid-year budget review is recommended as part of the City’s Financial Policies – Budget Management.

B. The City Council Priorities 2021-2026 include priorities and goals, some of which are included in the fiscal year 2021-2022 mid-year budget adjustments.

C. The City Council wishes to amend the 2021-2022 Fiscal Year Total Budget for funding of continued operations and one-time costs through the end of the fiscal year.

D. There are staffing level changes approved which will amend the allocated position listing as listed below (mid-year amendments reflect partial year). a. Unfreeze two (2) Maintenance Technician positions
b. Eliminate one (1) Capital Improvement Projects Manager position c. Establish one (1) Capital Program and Facilities Program Manager position d. Eliminate one (1) Stormwater Program Coordinator position e. Establish one (1) Complete Streets Program Manager position E. The City Manager and Director of Finance recommend the budget adjustments summarized on the next page.
520
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 2 of 3
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Adopts the 2021-2022 Fiscal year budget for the recommended adjustments listed above.

2. Adopts changes to the attached allocated position listing and salary tables, attached hereto as Exhibits “A” and “B,” respectively.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on March 15, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Revenue Expense Net Change
Increase/(Decrease) (Increase)/Decrease Revenue/(Expense) General Fund:
100 General Fund $ 691,500 $ (3,819,621) $ (3,128,121)
102 General Fund - Measure S Sales Tax $ 55,350 $ (52,520) $ 2,830 Total General Fund $ 746,850 $ (3,872,141) $ (3,125,291) Other Funds:
201 Gas Tax ** $ - $ (95,514) $ (95,514)
207 Snow Removal ** $ - $ (7,000) $ (7,000)
210 Vehicle Replacement ** $ 37,000 $ (47,400) $ (10,400) 218 VHR Program $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000
221 Ice Arena $ 115,000 $ (70,000) $ 45,000
223 Cannabis Program ** $ - $ (400,000) $ (400,000)
225 Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant $ -
231 AB3229 COPS $ - $ - $ -
232 Safety Sales Tax (Prop 172) ** $ (8,000) $ (8,000)
236 EMS - General Fund ** $ - $ (32,400) $ (32,400)
245 Storm Water Management Program $ 14,159 $ (14,159) $ - 253 Housing Administration $ 3,940 $ (3,940) $ -
263 TOT Trust Fund $ 800,000 $ (800,000) $ -
264 Local Fiscal Recovery Fund $ 377,500 $ (377,500) $ - 284 Measure S/R Bike Trails $ 7,000 $ (7,000) $ -
301 City CIP $ 853,520 $ (801,000) $ 52,520
310 Long Term Capital Replacement $ 200,000 $ (159,943) $ 40,057 501 Airport Enterprise Fund ** $ 282,110 $ (341,450) $ (59,340) 510 Parking Bellamy Court ** $ - $ (10,000) $ (10,000)
520 Parking Garage ** $ - $ (30,600) $ (30,600)
550 Transit Operations $ 75,000 $ (75,000) $ -
602 Self-Insured Workers Comp ** $ (6,550) $ (6,550)
725 RD Obligation Retirement Fund $ 800,000 $ - $ 800,000 Total Other Funds $ 3,635,229 $ (3,287,456) $ 347,773
Total All Funds $ 4,382,079 $ (7,159,597) $ (2,777,518) ** Fund Balance Available
521
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 3 of 3

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
522
Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 20/21 Adopted Mid-Year 20/21 21/22 Adopted thru Mar'22 21/22 Budget

CITY COUNCIL
Council Member (Elected) Department Total 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00

CITY CLERK
City Clerk (Elected) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00

CITY TREASURER
City Treasurer (Elected) Department Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00

CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Manager 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Assistant to the City Manager I 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Assistant to the City Manager II 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Communications and Project Specialist 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Sustainability Coordinator 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

3.00 3.50 5.00 5.00
Human Resources
Human Resources Manager 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Principal &/or H.R. Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Clerk 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Total 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Department Total 6.00 5.50 6.00 6.00 0.00

CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Risk Manager 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Paralegal 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.00 0.00

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Director of Administrative Services 1.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 Director of Finance 0.00 0.33 1.00 1.00
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Financial Services
Financial Services Manager 1.00 1.25 0.00 0.00
Financial Services Supervisor 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I, II 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I / Payroll Coordinator 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Management Analyst - Grants 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 Principal Management Analyst - Purchasing and Grants 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 Management Analyst - Admin Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.00 4.25 4.00 4.00 0.00
Revenue
Accounting Technician I, II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Supervising Accounting Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00
1 of 4
523
Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 20/21 Adopted Mid-Year 20/21 21/22 Adopted thru Mar'22 21/22 Budget

FINANCE DEPARTMENT (CONTINUED)
Information Systems
Information Systems Supervisor 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Network Systems Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Information Systems Technician 2.00 1.50 1.00 1.00
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Department Total 12.00 12.25 12.00 12.00 0.00

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Director of Development Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Development Services Director 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Associate Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Administrative Clerk I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 3.10 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Planning
Planning Manager/Environmental Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Planner, Assistant Planner 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Development Services Technician 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00
Housing
Housing Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Planner, Assistant Planner- Housing 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Building and Safety
Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Building Official 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pr Bldg & Sr Bldg Inspector, Bldg Inspector, Hsng Insp. 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 Sr. Building Inspector - VHR (limited term) 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Sr. Permit Center Technician, Permit Center Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00
Department Total 15.10 15.00 15.00 15.00 1.00

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Capital Improvement Projects Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 Capital Program and Facilities Program Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 Office Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Engineering
Construction Engineer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Stormwater Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
Complete Streets Program Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
GIS Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Resident Engineer / Resident Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Civil Engineer, Assistant Engineer 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 1.00
Maintenance Operations / Snow Removal
Maintenance Manager 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.00
Lead Maintenance Technician 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
2 of 4
524
Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 20/21 Adopted Mid-Year 20/21 21/22 Adopted thru Mar'22 21/22 Budget

PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED)
Maintenance Operations / Snow Removal (continued)
Maintenance Technician I, II, III, IV, V 21.00 18.50 14.00 14.83 Total 27.00 24.00 18.00 18.83 0.00
Fleet Maintenance
Maintenance Manager - Fleet 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Fleet Supervisor 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Equipment Mechanic I, II, III 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Fleet Control Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.00
Airport
Airport Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Technician I, II, III, IV, V 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Department Total 47.00 44.00 37.00 37.83 1.00

PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Director of Parks and Recreation 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Total 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Recreation
Recreation Superintendent 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Administrative Clerk I, II 1.00 0.75 0.00 0.00
Administrative Assistant I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Manager 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Recreation Supervisor 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00
Events Coordinator 0.00 0.25 1.00 1.00
Total 4.00 3.50 3.00 3.00
Parks
Maintenance Manager - Parks 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.00
Lead Maintenance Technician 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Technicians I, II, III, IV,V 0.00 2.50 7.00 7.00 Total 0.00 3.00 9.00 9.00
Department Total 4.00 7.00 13.00 13.00 0.00

FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Fire Chief / Fire Marshall 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75
Fire Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Fire Captain 6.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Fire Engineer 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Firefighter, Paramedic 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Firefighter, Paramedic (2 1/2-year limited term) 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Firefighter, Paramedic (SAFER Grant) 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Fire Safety Inspector I, II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Executive Assistant to the Fire Chief 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Department Total 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.75 0.00
3 of 4
525
Allocated Permanent Positions
Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Authorized/ Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Appropriated Frozen Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Department/Positions 20/21 Adopted Mid-Year 20/21 21/22 Adopted thru Mar'22 21/22 Budget

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Chief of Police 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Lieutenant 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Police Sergeant 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Police Officer 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 1.00
Police Officer (cannabis) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Officer (Tobacco grant) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Safety Dispatch Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Records Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Safety Dispatcher 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Senior Police Records Tech, Police Record Tech 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Evidence/Prop Tech, Evidence/Prop Tech 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead Community Services Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Community Svcs Officer, Community Svcs Officer 8.10 8.10 5.00 5.00 Code Compliance Investigator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 68.10 68.10 65.00 65.00 1.00
Total City Employees 203.20 203.35 200.00 201.58 3.00
*Reflects mid-year adjustments. Includes positions added or eliminated during the year. 4 of 4
526

XXXX COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM MANAGER
Index Key Value Hourly Monthly
1400/XXXX/01 57.6074 9,985
1400/XXXX/02 60.4877 10,484
1400/XXXX/03 63.5122 11,008
1400/XXXX/04 66.6877 11,559
1400/XXXX/05 70.0221 12,137

XXXX CAPITAL PROGRAM AND FACILITIES PROGRAM MANAGER
Index Key Value Hourly Monthly
1400/XXXX/01 57.6074 9,985
1400/XXXX/02 60.4877 10,484
1400/XXXX/03 63.5122 11,008
1400/XXXX/04 66.6877 11,559
1400/XXXX/05 70.0221 12,137
1431 AIRPORT MANAGER
Index Key Value Hourly Monthly
1400/1493/01 57.6074 9,985
1400/1493/02 60.4877 10,484
1400/1493/03 63.5122 11,008
1400/1493/04 66.6877 11,559
1400/1493/05 70.0221 12,137
City of South Lake Tahoe
Salary Table Updates Effective 4/02/2022
1 of 1
527
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE – CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE –GENERAL FUND FIVE GENERAL FUND FIVE GENERAL FUND FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN YEAR FINANCIAL PLANUPDATE Fiscal Years Fiscal Years2023to 2027

REVENUES BY TYPE
Actual
2019-2020
Actual
2020-2021
Budget
2021-2022
Estimated
2022-2023
Estimated
2023-2024
Estimated
2024-2025
Estimated
2025-2026
Estimated
2026-2027
Prop Tax $ 9,135,477 8,632,709 $ 9,175,180 $ 9,450,435 $ 9,733,948 $ 10,025,967 $ 10,326,746 $ 10,636,548 $ TOT $ 11,166,046 9,538,728 $ 10,227,113 $ 10,354,952 $ 10,458,501 $ 10,589,233 $ 10,721,598 $ 10,855,618 $ Sales Tax $ 7,152,233 5,460,038 $ 6,300,650 $ 6,379,408 $ 6,443,202 $ 6,523,742 $ 6,605,289 $ 6,687,855 $ Transfer IN $ 966,568 2,953,292 $ 851,887 $ 1,351,700 $ 2,300,432 $ 2,405,894 $ 2,454,196 $ 2,501,524 $ Vehicle Lic Fee $ 2,409,143 2,284,264 $ 2,285,000 $ 2,313,563 $ 2,336,698 $ 2,365,907 $ 2,395,481 $ 2,425,424 $ Measure Q $ 3,695,854 2,915,365 $ 3,192,325 $ 3,232,229 $ 3,264,551 $ 3,305,358 $ 3,346,675 $ 3,388,509 $ Parks & Rec Rev $ 272,917 380,845 $ 1,079,400 $ 380,845 $ 700,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,450,000 $ Project Area TOT 4,982,523 $ 5,952,873 $ 6,742,177 $ 6,826,454 $ 6,894,719 $ 6,980,903 $ 7,068,164 $ 7,156,516 $ Other $ 1,075,761 1,634,538 $ 1,208,815 $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ 950,000 $ Police Rev $ 1,423,215 1,257,891 $ 1,383,675 $ 1,389,475 $ 1,395,275 $ 1,401,075 $ 1,406,875 $ 1,412,675 $ Franchise Fees $ 1,627,041 1,593,143 $ 1,540,000 $ 1,563,100 $ 1,586,547 $ 1,610,345 $ 1,634,500 $ 1,659,017 $ Business License 1,723,693 $ 1,756,977 $ 1,687,000 $ 1,723,693 $ 1,735,693 $ 1,747,693 $ 1,759,693 $ 1,771,693 $ Public Svc Rev $ 2,331,402 2,657,474 $ 1,946,303 $ 1,815,000 $ 1,820,000 $ 1,825,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 1,830,000 $ Fire Rev $ 1,185,739 585,056 $ 755,234 $ 185,350 $ 189,057 $ 192,838 $ 196,695 $ 200,629 $ Base Revenues 50,151,246 46,599,559 48,374,759 47,916,204 49,808,624 51,373,954 52,145,912 52,926,008

EXPENDITURES BY DEPT
Police 11,181,833 11,231,738 12,802,829 12,504,139 12,976,038 13,407,350 13,843,683 14,259,024 Fire 9,179,636 7,706,752 9,599,357 9,521,245 9,885,385 10,212,867 10,544,268 10,858,986 Gen Fund Trans OUT 3,956,987 6,069,038 4,842,989 2,786,979 2,863,331 2,939,809 3,069,417 3,076,158 Gen Fund Trans OUT - Debt Service 2,426,980 2,768,000 3,285,103 3,396,264 3,438,249 3,478,565 3,442,815 2,178,624 Recreation 1,648,474 1,063,736 3,137,590 3,210,248 3,302,388 3,397,453 3,495,539 3,596,747 Gen Gov 3,175,673 3,720,478 4,258,770 4,278,001 4,410,199 4,546,630 4,687,436 4,832,764 Finance 2,451,366 1,518,519 2,511,290 2,463,101 2,540,499 2,620,440 2,703,013 2,788,310 Misc Gen Fund 4,235,920 4,322,307 5,365,927 4,863,476 5,127,917 5,126,251 5,337,045 5,490,641 Development Services 1,930,570 1,607,577 2,119,058 2,027,212 2,090,578 2,156,021 2,223,612 2,293,425 Public Works/Engineering 5,040,449 4,426,217 3,880,659 3,998,754 4,123,940 4,253,227 4,386,759 4,524,683 BASE Expenses 46,743,733 42,918,517 51,803,571 49,049,418 50,758,523 52,138,612 53,733,587 53,899,362 Gain/(Loss) 3,681,042 3,407,513 (3,428,812) (1,133,214) (949,899) (764,658) (1,587,674) (973,354) 528

MEASURE S SALES TAX GENERAL FUND FIVE MEASURE S SALES TAX GENERAL FUND FIVE GENERAL FUND FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN YEAR FINANCIAL PLANUPDATE Fiscal Years 2023 Fiscal Years 2023to2027
Actual Budget Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast REVENUES 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027Measure S Sales Tax 3,207,042 6,384,650 6,464,458 6,529,103 6,610,716 6,693,350 6,777,017 REVENUES TOTAL 3,207,042 $ 6,384,650 $ 6,464,458 $ 6,529,103 $ 6,610,716 $ 6,693,350 $ 6,777,017 $ EXPENDITURES / FINANCING USESTechnical Services 2,406 - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Transfer out for:

PAYGO - Communications System 441,129 1,712,000 32,325 34,480 36,635 43,100 47,410 Financing - Communications System 554,643 554,643 554,643 554,643 554,643 - - Equipment - CAD Upgrade 445,722 - - - - - -
Fire Station II Rehabilitation 75,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Fire Station II Staffing - 396,010 1,050,000 1,134,000 1,224,720 1,261,462 1,299,305 Fire Marshall position funding @ 50% 171,000 - 116,000 125,280 135,302 139,361 143,542 Stormwater Management Program 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Road Reconstruction 750,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 Vehicle and Equipment Replacement - 500,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 EXPENDITURES TOTAL 2,268,900 $ 6,383,653 $ 6,507,968 $ 6,603,403 $ 6,706,300 $ 6,998,923 $ 6,545,258 $ MEASURE S FUND YEAR-END BALANCE 938,142 $ 939,139 $ 895,629 $ 821,329 $ 725,745 $ 420,172 $ 651,932 $ 529
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN UPDATE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN UPDATE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN UPDATE:REVENUES REVENUES REVENUESASSUMPTIONS ASSUMPTIONS ASSUMPTIONS 2022-2023 2023-2024 2022-2023 2023-2024 2023-2024 2024-2025 2024-2025 2024-2025 2025-2026 2025-2026 2025-2026 2026-2027 2026-2027 Property Tax 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%T.O.T./Project Area T.O.T 1.25% 1.00% 1.25% 1.25% 1.25%Sales Tax/Measure Q/Measure S 1.25% 1.00% 1.25% 1.25% 1.25%Transfer-in no change $850,000 from Parking Garage
revenue, possible
early debt pay-off
$850,000 from
Parking Garage
revenue, possible
early debt pay-off
$850,000 from
Parking Garage
revenue, possible
early debt pay-off
$850,000 from
Parking Garage
revenue, possible
early debt pay-off
Vehicle License Fee 1.25% 1.00% 1.25% 1.25% 1.25%Franchise Fees 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50%Fire Revenue / Safer Grant / Measure S $1.17 miliion
from Measure S
for 7 FFs & FM
$1.26 miliion
from Measure S
for 7 FFs & FM
$1.36 miliion
from Measure S
for 7 FFs & FM
$1.40 miliion
from Measure S
for 7 FFs & FM
$1.44 miliion
from Measure S
for 7 FFs & FM

MAJOR REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS
530
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN UPDATE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN UPDATE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN UPDATE:EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES ASSUMPTIONS ASSUMPTIONS ASSUMPTIONS 2022-2023 2023-2024 2022-2023 2023-2024 2023-2024 2024-2025 2024-2025 2024-2025 2025-2026 2025-2026 2025-2026 2026-2027 2026-2027 Salaries 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Health 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%Pension 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Pension (UAL) PERS actuarial estimates;
assumes
prepayment
PERS actuarial
estimates;
assumes
prepayment
PERS actuarial
estimates;
assumes
prepayment
PERS actuarial
estimates;
assumes
prepayment
PERS actuarial
estimates;
assumes
prepayment
Road Repairs none none none none none Vehicle and Equipment Replacement none none none none none Transfers-out CIP Projects none none none none none
Other Personnel Expenditures 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%Other Operational Expenditures 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Contractual Services 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%Capital Outlay 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%

MAJOR EXPENSE ASSUMPTIONS
531
California Public Employees’ Retirement System
P.O. Box 942715 | Sacramento, CA 94229-2715
888 CalPERS (or 888-225-7377) | TTY: (877) 249-7442
www.calpers.ca.gov
Actuarial
Circular Letter
January 5, 2022
Circular Letter: 200-006-22
Distribution: IV
To: All Public Agency Employers
Subject: Required Contribution Impact Due to Changes in Actuarial Assumptions Purpose
The purpose ofthis Circular Letter is to inform you of system changes which will impact employer and some member contribution rates. On November17, 2021, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) Board of Administration voted to keep the discount rate at 6.8% and selected a new asset allocation for the fund'sinvestment portfolio for the next four years. Additionally, new demographic and economic actuarial assumptions were adopted.

Background
The changes adopted by the board represent the culmination of nearly four years of work on the asset liability management (ALM) process. The ALM process is an integral part of the CalPERS 2017-22 Strategic Plan to fund the system through an integrated view of pension assets and liabilities and to improve long-term pension and health benefit sustainability. This process was conducted as a joint effort by the Investment, Actuarial, and Financial offices. Throughout the entire process, and particularly over the last year, CalPERS team members have engaged extensively with stakeholdersto obtain their input. This process included an examination of the risk and/return characteristics of possible asset allocations as well as modeling the impact these asset allocations would have on the funding of the system.

In July 2021, the discount rate was lowered from 7.0% to 6.8% automatically due to the Funding Risk Mitigation Policy (PDF). That action was prompted by the announcement that the rate of 532
Circular Letter: 200-006-22
January 5, 2022

return for fiscal year (FY) 2020-21 was 21.3%. The new asset allocation chosen by the board in November2021 has an expected long-term rate of return of 6.8% per year.

The completion of the ALM cycle also coincided with a review of all actuarial assumptions used in the actuarial valuations through a process called an experience study. An experience study is a summarization of actual system experience overa defined period and, along with future expectations, is used in setting new actuarial assumptions. Experience studies which include reviews of both economic and demographic assumptions are required at least every four years under the Public Employees’ Retirement Law. The previous study was conducted in 2017.

Discussion
The adopted changes to the actuarial assumptions are expected to increase slightly near-term employer contributions requirements. However, when the expe cted impact of the investment gain for FY 2020-21 is factored in, many plans will see required employer contributions that are comparable to or slightly lower than previously determined contribution requirements. Each plan is unique and contribution impacts will vary across public agencies. Factors that influence the impact of these changes include the benefit structure, the demographics of the plan members, and the funded status of the plan.

While most demographic assumptions were changed, the changes that are expected to have the most material impact on required contributions are slightly longer life expectancies for retirees and beneficiaries, earlier than expected retirement ages for certain safety groups, and higher expected future pay increases for some groups.

All newly adopted assumptions will be implemented in the June 30, 2021 Public Agency actuarial valuations, setting employer contribution requirementsfor FY 2023-24. 533
Circular Letter: 200-006-22
January 5, 2022

Below is a table showing the estimated impact of the new actuarial assumptions (excluding the discount rate) on employerrates by category. These figures do NOT include the impact of the discount rate drop to 6.8% or the FY 2020-21 investment return of 21.3%.

Category
Estimated Change in
Total Normal Cost
(% of Payroll)
Estimated Change in
Unfunded Accrued
Liability (UAL)
Contribution
(% of Payroll)
Estimated Change in
Total Employer
Contribution*
(% of Payroll)
Miscellaneous 2% at 60 0.2% to 0.9% (0.6%) to 0.6% 0.1% to 1.4% Miscellaneous 2% at 55 0.1% to 1.0% (2.4%) to 0.7% (2.0%) to 1.7% Miscellaneous 2.5% at 55 0.2% to 1.0% (1.9%) to 0.9% (1.5%) to 1.9% Miscellaneous 2.7% at 55 0.5% to 1.0% (2.0%) to 0.8% (1.5%) to 1.7% Miscellaneous 3% at 60 0.5% to 1.1% (2.4%) to 0.7% (1.9%) to 1.8% Miscellaneous 2% at 62 0.0% to 1.0% N/A N/A
Safety 2% at 50 (0.3%) to (0.1%) (1.6%) to (1.2%) (1.7%) to (1.3%) Safety 3% at 55 (0.2%) to 1.1% (1.4%) to (0.1%) (1.6%) to 0.6% Safety 3% at 50 0.2% to 2.1% (3.5%) to 2.4% (2.3%) to 4.1% Safety 2.7% at 57 (0.3%) to 1.3% N/A N/A

Assumes the increase in unfunded liability due to the assumption changes will be amortized in accordance with current board policy, i.e. over a 20-year period with level dollar amortization. Also assumes no change to the member contribution rates. 534
Circular Letter: 200-006-22
January 5, 2022

The table below shows the total estimated impact of new actuarial assumptions including the discount rate decrease to 6.8% and the FY 2020-21 investment return of 21.3%.

Category
Estimated Change in
Total Normal Cost
(% of Payroll)
Estimated Change in
UAL Contribution
(% of Payroll)
Estimated Change in
Total Employer
Contribution*
(% of Payroll)
Miscellaneous 2% at 60 0.9% to 1.7% (5.4%) to 0% (3.8%) to 1.4% Miscellaneous 2% at 55 1.0% to 1.9% (8.8%) to 0% (7.2%) to 1.5% Miscellaneous 2.5% at 55 1.2% to 2.4% (10.1%) to 0.1% (8.3%) to 2.0% Miscellaneous 2.7% at 55 1.4% to 2.3% (8.3%) to (0.5%) (6.5%) to 1.4% Miscellaneous 3% at 60 1.4% to 2.4% (9.1%) to (0.3%) (6.8%) to 1.5% Miscellaneous 2% at 62 0.7% to 1.6% N/A N/A
Safety 2% at 50 0.9% to 1.4% (5.4%) to (4.2%) (4.2%) to (2.9%) Safety 3% at 55 1.3% to 2.7% (4.4%) to (0.8%) (3.0%) to 1.7% Safety 3% at 50 1.5% to 4.3% (16.1%) to 0.3% (12.9%) to 4.3% Safety 2.7% at 57 1.0% to 2.6% N/A N/A
 Assumes the increase in unfunded liability due to the assumption changes will be amortized in accordance with current board policy , i.e. over a 20-year period with level dollar amortization. Also assumes no change to the member contribution rates. 535
Circular Letter: 200-006-22
January 5, 2022

PEPRA Member Rates
With the enactment of the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) new benefits were established for new public employeesin California hired on or after January 1, 2013.

PEPRA membersthat are employed by public agencies are required to contribute 50% of the total normal cost oftheir pension benefit as determined by the actuary. However,the PEPRA memberrate is not adjusted unless the PEPRA total normal cost changes by 1% of payroll or more.

Below is a table which illustrates the estimated impact on the total normal cost from the changes in actuarial assumptions including the discount rate change. Ifthe change to the Total Normal Cost is 1% or greater, PEPRA memberswill pay half of the increase.

Category
Estimated Change in
PEPRA Total Normal Cost Rate
(% of Payroll)
Public Agencies Miscellaneous 0.7% to 1.6%
Public Agencies Safety 1.0% to 2.6%
The ranges listed above are expected to cover 90% of the Public Agency plans.

The figures in this letter are estimates. The actual impact of the new assumptions on your employer contribution requirement will be implemented in the June 30, 2021 actuarial valuations which will set the employer contribution requirements for FY 2023-24.

The results of the experience study are described in detail in the 2021 experience study report, which can be found on the CalPERS website.

Questions
If you have any questions, call the CalPERS CustomerContact Center at 888 CalPERS (or 888- 225-7377).

Scott Terando, Chief Actuary
Actuarial Office
536
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Agenda Item #: 15
Agenda Item: Joint application with El Dorado County for Grant from U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) for Middle-Mile Broadband Implementation Executive Summary: Staff has been working with El Dorado County to develop and submit a grant application to the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) for broadband Middle Mile implementation along US 50 and 89. The implementation of this broadband segment will provide the necessary connectivity along these corridors and will support the Broadband Feasibility Study which is underway. Caltrans has been invited to participate in this grant application.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution: 1) Authorizing the Department of Public Works to jointly submit a grant application to the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) in collaboration with El Dorado County for Middle-Mile Broadband Implementation along US 50 and 89; and 2) Committing to the match funding requirements in the total amount of $1,128,000 from 2021-2022 American Rescue Plan Act funding.

Responsible Staff Members: Joseph Irvin, City Manager and Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works Responsible Staff Member: Joe Irvin, City Manager (530) - 542-6043 Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works (530) 542-6031
Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - Broadband Grant.docx
02 - Draft Project Location Map and Grant Description.docx 03 - Resolution - EDA Grant.doc
537
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Title: Authorization to submit a joint Grant Application with El Dorado County to the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) for Middle-Mile Broadband Implementation along US 50 and 89
Location: US 50 and 89 Corridor in City of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County Responsible Staff Member: Joe Irvin, City Manager (530) 542-6043 Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works (530) 542-6031
Background: The City of South Lake Tahoe has been in discussion with El Dorado County for submittal of a joint grant application to the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) for the implementation of a middle-mile broadband system along US 50 and 89.

In 2018, El Dorado County embarked on a Broadband Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study. NEO Connect was selected by the County to complete this study. On June 30, 2020, the El Dorado County Board provided directed staff to apply for a grant from the EDA. The grant was for priority areas within the County and included projects up to $4.5 million. The county staff completed all requirements of the submission and is in the final steps of receiving a formal grant offer. The project areas are Garden Valley, Georgetown, and Cool.

Issue and Discussion: On August 24, 2021, the El Dorado County Board directed the Chief Administrative Officer to continue conversations with the City of South Lake Tahoe to pursue the City’s portion of the matching funds from South Lake Tahoe segments, primarily along US 50 and 89. The County Chief Administrative Officer and City Manager have been in discussion for collaboration and matching fund share for the project.

In accordance with City policies, the Public Works staff is requesting authorization to pursue the grant mentioned above for the US 50 and 89 projects, including the anticipated match funding requirement.

Financial Implications: NEO Connect has developed a draft grant plan that extends along US 50 and 89 as shown on the attached map. The County will be applying for the Fiscal Year 2021 American Rescue Plan Act under the Travel, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation grant.

The proposed project his proposal will benefit approximately 2,342 parcels in the City of South Lake Tahoe and 147 parcels in the County for a total of 2,489 parcels that would benefit from this project. The estimated cost of this project is approximately $6.0 million. 538
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 2 of 2
The EDA grant funds typically require a 20% match. Therefore, the total required matching fund is $1.2 million for the project. Therefore, the recommended matching fund share between the City and County would be 94% for the City and 6% for the County. The matching fund portion for the City will be $1,128,000.

City staff has researched the use of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) as a matching fund since EDA is also a federal program. Based on the review of EDAs’ grant information, if the applicant is using the “Revenue Reduction” component of the ARPA funding, then the ARPA funds can be used as a match. Therefore, staff recommends using the currently allocated $200,000 for the FY 2021 allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) and the balance of the funds or $928,000 from the FY 2022 allocation of the SLFRF funds.

Since the project will involve the installation of a conduit system inside the Caltrans Right of Way and would ultimately require a Caltrans Encroachment Permit, we have reached out to Caltrans to join in this partnership and submit the joint grant application.

Environmental Considerations: The grant project will require compliance with CEQA and NEPA requirements, which will a part of the final design and environmental clearance. It is expected that this project will receive a Categorical Exclusion clearance.

Policy Implications: These projects advance the City Council Strategic Priorities and Goals, specifically:
 Action Item 1.1 (Broadband for All) connects the community via high-speed internet to serve the needs of local businesses, residents, attract remote workers to the Region and seek appropriate funding opportunities to assist in the evaluation of bringing broadband infrastructure to South Lake Tahoe. 539
El Dorado County, EDA Grant Application - DRAFT
The network will pass 2,489 total parcels. Below is a map showing the various types of parcels along the fiber route.

Row Labels County SouthLakeTahoe Grand Total
COM 2 595 597
IND 211 211
MFR 2 202 204
MSC 12 103 115
RES 124 900 1024
UNK 7 331 338
Grand Total 147 2342 2489
540
Major Assumptions Values
# Parcels/Passings 2489
Total Plant Miles 16.79
# Poles 8
Est. Aerial Miles 0.00
Est. UG Miles 0.00
Aerial % 30%
UG % 70%
Density HH/Mile -
Take Rate 40%
Make Ready Cost per mile (all in labor only) $ -
ADSS or Strand/Lash Strand/Lash
Missile Bore/Open
Trench % 0%
Directional Bore % 100%
Plow % 0%
LD Downtown % 0%
HD Downtown % 0%
Rock Adder % 25%
Cut/Restore % 0%
Make Ready
Construction yes
OLT Equipment no
ONT Equipment no
541
Current Estimate of Probable Costs

FTTH GPON
Overall
Project Cost before
Contingency and
Administrative $ 4,918,263.20
Cost per HHP $ 1,976.00
Cost per HHS $ 4,940.00
Cost per MI $ 292,951.92
Engr. Labor Project Cost $ 147,784.02
Aerial Labor Project Cost $ 266,589.22
UG Labor Project Cost $ 3,343,435.43
Tech Services Labor Project Cost $ 171,167.08
Customer Premise Labor and Install Materials including Splitters Project Cost $ - OSP Materials Project Cost $ 989,287.46
Electronics Project Cost $ -
Subtotal $ 4,918,263.20
Administrative (2%) $ 98,365.26
Contingency (20%) $ 983,652.64
Grand Total $ 6,000,281.11
542
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 1
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
March 15, 2022
Approval of Joint Grant Application for Grant Funds from the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) Grant Fund Program

BACKGROUND
A. The U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) has announced a grant opportunity for FY 2021 American Recure Plan Act Travel, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOF) (ARPA Tourism NOFO); and
B. EDA Competitive Tourism Grants, there are no application submission deadlines and Applications will be accepted on an ongoing basis until the publication of a new ARPA Tourism NOFO, cancellation of the NOFO, or all available funds have been expended; and C. EDA’s ARPA Tourism NOFO is designed to provide a wide range of financial assistance to communities and regions to rebuild and strengthen their travel, tourism, and outdoor recreation industry through various infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Approves filing of a joint grant Application with El Dorado County for the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) has announced a grant opportunity for FY 2021 American Recure Plan Act Travel, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation.

2. States that the EDA grant will entail a middle-mile broadband implementation along US 50 and 89 from Stateline to the City Limits.

3. Certifies the Project is consistent with the City’s general plan or the equivalent planning document.

4. Commits to the matching funds in the total amount of $1,128,000 from the Revenue Reduction portion of the ARPA 2021 and 2022 City’s ARPA funding allocation, if the grant is awarded.

5. Appoints the City Manager as an agent to submit all documents, including but not limited to the Application, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and so on, which may be necessary to complete the Project.

6. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and guidelines.
543
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 1
Adopted by the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe on March 15, 2022, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
_______________________________ Date: _______________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council
544
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Agenda Item #: 16
Agenda Item: Grant Applications to Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Program for Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan and Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project
Executive Summary: The USDOT has issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity for the national infrastructure Investment under the infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Bipartisan Infrastructure Law).

There is a total of $1.5 million funding for the program, of which $15 million is guaranteed in the areas of historically disadvantaged communities, and $75 million for planning projects. The staff has selected two projects for this year's grant application: 1) Complete Street Programmatic Master Plan (Planning Project), and 2) Rudy Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Upgrade Project (Construction Phase)
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution: 1) Authorizing the Department of Public Works to submit two grant applications through the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) program; and 2) Committing to the match funding requirement in the amount of $480,000 for the Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan and $400,000 for the Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project from the undesignated General Funds.

Responsible Staff Members: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works and Jason Burke, Stormwater Program Coordinator
Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works (530) 542-6031 Jason Burke, Stormwater Program Coordinator (530) 542-6038 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - RAISE Grants.docx
02 - Complete Streets Project Location Map.pdf
03 - Ruby Way Project Location Map.pdf
04 - Letter of Support from Caltrans-Complete Street Programmatic Master Plan Project.docx 05 - Letter of Support from Caltrans-Ruby Way Project.docx 06 - RAISE 2022 Intake Form 2-8-22 for Complete Street Master Plan.docx 07 - RAISE 2022 Intake Form 2-8-22 for Ruby Way Project.docx 08 - Resolution - RAISE Grants.doc
545
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Title: Authorization to Submit two Grant Applications for Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Program Location: Citywide for the Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan (See Map) Ruby Way/Overlook Court Neighborhood (See Map)
Responsible Staff Member: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works (530) 542-6031 Jason Burke, Stormwater Program Coordinator (530) 542-6038 Background: The Public Works Department has identified two projects that are high-priority projects for the City to address environmental and mobility issues in the City. These projects are excellent candidates for the 2022 Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant. The RAISE Grant is a part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act or Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) that was recently passed by the U.S. Congress.

Funds for the FY 2022 RAISE grant program are to be awarded on a competitive basis for surface transportation infrastructure projects that will have significant local or regional impacts. BIL authorized and appropriated $1.5 billion for FY 2022 for the Local and Regional Projects Assistance Program. In addition to the capital investments, the Department of Transportation (DOT) will award at least $75million eligible planning and design projects. US DOT will also award at least $15 million for projects in areas of historically disadvantaged communities, which includes a portion of South Lake Tahoe.

These grants are supportive of projects that improve safety, economic strength, and global competitiveness, equity, and climate and sustainability goals of US DOT. RAISE program also includes projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and are designed with specific elements to address climate change impacts environmental justice, particularly for communities that disproportionally experience climate changerelated consequences. The minimum grant for rural projects is $1million (urban areas are census-designated areas with a population greater than 200,000 in the 2010 Census). The grant applications are due on April 14, 2022, and awardees will be notified by August 1, 2022. Typically, the matching funds for these grants is a 20% local match.

In accordance with City policies, the Public Works staff is requesting authorization to pursue the grant mentioned above for the following projects, including the anticipated match that these grants would require.
546
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 2 of 3
Issue and Discussion: City staff have identified two FY 22 RAISE Grant projects.

1. Complete Street Programmatic Master Plan. This would be a planning study to develop a Programmatic Master Plan to address flooding, drainage, and water quality issues, mobility, and access improvements for historically Disadvantaged Communities in the City of South Lake Tahoe and create a Programmatic Master Plan for Complete Street Design Plans in the City. The Complete Streets Concept is one of the goals of US DOT and consistent with TRPA recommendations to address infrastructure and mobility upgrades. The project will review the underlying drainage issues in the City and specifically develop a Complete Streets Master plan for the disadvantaged areas (approximately 50% of the City).

The Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan will seek to address aging or inadequate underground infrastructure (drainage, water supply, and sewer) at the same time as providing above-ground mobility, safety, and accessibility streetscape improvements. By ensuring that underground infrastructure is updated to protect Lake Tahoe from urban runoff pollution, broadband needs are considered, water supply and fire flow systems are updated, and aging sewer conveyance system issues are resolved before surface mobility improvements are constructed, the master plan will ensure the City's 'dig once' approach to infrastructure upgrades are considered in this comprehensive approach to Complete Streets project planning. The project goal is to address mobility and alternative transportation modes in the City. It would also identify locations for EV charging stations in the project area.

The project's outcome will include a master plan for complete streets implementation and the required environmental documents and design plans to advance these projects to the construction phase.

2. Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project. This project will address environmental and mobility issues in the Ruby Way/Overlook Court neighborhood. The project directly benefits this historically Disadvantaged Community by reducing flood risk that dramatically impacts residents within low-income apartments and enhances mobility through bicycle and pedestrian access upgrades. The project area includes a segment of the South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail (Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway) in a location that experiences periodic flooding due to the routing of concentrated runoff into eroding and incised channels and failing drainage culverts. The project will improve stormwater quality and reduce flooding in economically and socially disadvantaged neighborhoods.

The project was developed to address hillside drainage problems that would have impacted the future alignment of the South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail (Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway) by combining drainage, water quality, and bike path improvements into one comprehensive project. In addition, the project includes climate change mitigation (encouraging active transportation) and climate resilience. 547
Council Agenda Report March 15, 2022 Page 3 of 3
The design of the project is complete; however, currently, there is no funding available for the project's construction. Therefore, this project is near shovel-ready and a good candidate for the Construction Grant.

Financial Implications: The estimated cost of the Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan is $2.4 million. Staff is recommending $1.92 million in RAISE grant request with 20% matching funds in the amount of $480,000, using undesignated General Funds balance. The estimated construction cost of the Rudy/Way Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project is $2 million. Staff is recommending a $1.6 million RAISE grant with a 20% local match in the amount of $400,000, using undesignated General Fund balance.

Environmental Considerations: The Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan will include the preparation and approval of both the CEQA, TRPA and NEPA environmental documents. The Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Project have an approved CEQA document, but a NEPA document is required to meet federal requirements if the project is federally funded along with the TRPA Initial Environmental Checklist (IEC).

Policy Implications: These projects advance the City Council Strategic Priorities and Goals, specifically:
 Action Item 1.4 (Transportation) to prioritize implementation of trails and complete streets, specifically the Greenway (now named the Dennis T. Machida Memorial Trail),
 Action Item 2.3 (Connectivity) to facilitate implementation of trail infrastructure prioritizing the connection of bicycle and walking trails, from neighborhoods to the Dennis T. Machida Memorial Trail and other new and existing trails, and  Action Item 5.3 (Infrastructure and Maintenance) actively seeking funding to develop sustainable infrastructure projects based on the prioritized capital improvement project list.
548
549
550
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR
P.O. BOX 942873, MS–49 | SACRAMENTO, CA 94273–0001
(916) 654-6130 | FAX (916) 653-5776 TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
April 08, 2022
The Honorable Pete Buttigieg
Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Secretary Buttigieg:

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) supports the application of the City of South Lake Tahoe to the United States Department of Transportation’s (USDOT) Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) competitive grant program for the Complete Street Programmatic Master Plan Project (Project).

The City of South Lake Tahoe requests $1,920,000 through the RAISE 2022 grant with 20% ($480,000) local match funds. The proposed Project is a planning effort that would benefit five (5) Historically Disadvantaged Community census tracks in the City. The master planning effort will develop a Complete Street Program to address flooding, mobility, and access improvements. The Complete Street design plans will enable the City to fund and build sustainable corridors to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), address safety, provide opportunities for mode shift, reduce long-term maintenance costs, and dramatically impacts residents within low-income neighborhoods. The Project addresses safety, environmental sustainability, quality of life, mobility and community connectivity, economic competitiveness and opportunity, innovation, and state of good repair criteria identified with the RAISE grant. In addition, it improves water quality for the Lake Tahoe basin, an environmentally sensitive region, and directly addresses Climate Change and Resiliency.

Caltrans is a significant partner with the City of South Lake Tahoe through the US 50 corridor, with access through the entire City.

Caltrans would like to thank USDOT for its consideration of this Project.

Sincerely,

TOKS OMISHAKIN
Director
551
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR
P.O. BOX 942873, MS–49 | SACRAMENTO, CA 94273–0001
(916) 654-6130 | FAX (916) 653-5776 TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
April 08, 2021
The Honorable Pete Buttigieg
Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Secretary Buttigieg:

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) supports the application of the City of South Lake Tahoe to the United States Department of Transportation’s (USDOT) Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) competitive grant program for the Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project (Project).

The City of South Lake Tahoe requests $2,000,000 through the RAISE 2022 grant with 20% ($400,000) local match funds. The Project is at 90% Design Level. It will directly benefit a Historically Disadvantaged Community in the City by reducing flooding risk that dramatically impacts residents within a low-income neighborhood and enhances mobility through bicycle and pedestrian access upgrades. The Project addresses environmental sustainability, quality of life, mobility and community connectivity, economic competitiveness and opportunity, and state of good repair criteria identified with the RAISE grant application. In addition, it improves water quality for the Lake Tahoe basin, an environmentally sensitive region, and directly addresses Climate Change and Resiliency.

Caltrans is a significant partner with the City of South Lake Tahoe through the US 50 corridor, with access through the entire City.

Caltrans would like to thank USDOT for its consideration of this Project.

Sincerely,

TOKS OMISHAKIN
Director
552
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
I. General Information

1. Project Name*
Complete Street Programmatic Master Plan

2. Requesting Agency Lead Applicant*
City of South Lake Tahoe

3. Requesting Agency
Co-Applicant(s)*

4. Implementing
Agency*
City of South Lake Tahoe

5. Planning or Capital Grant*
Planning

6. District* 3 7. County* El Dorado 8. Route* OFF 9. Start PM NA 10. End PM NA

11. Urban/Rural Rural 12. Areas of Persistent Poverty or Historically Disadvantaged Community (y/n)* Y
12a. If yes, which? Historically Disadvantaged
Community

13. Description of Area of Persistent Poverty or
Historically Disadvantaged Community
Cencus Tracks: 316, 302, 303.01/.02, 304.02 are within
the City of South Lake Tahoe

14. Location Description and Project Description*
This project will develop a Programmatic Master Plan to address flooding, drainage issues, mobility and access improvements for Historically Disadvantaged Communities and create a Programmatic Master Plan for Complete Street Design Plans in the City.

15. Current Phase*
Concept Phase

16. RAISE 2022 Requesting Phase(s)*
Planning Study

17. Total Project Cost ($x1000)*
$2,400

18. RAISE 2022 Request ($x1000)*
$1,920

19. Construction Start date (mm/yy)
NA

20. List Congressional Representative(s) by name and District Number* Tom McClintock - Congressional District 4

21. Describe the extent of past/future Caltrans Stakeholder Engagement and Partnership on the project* This Project is in Planning Stage. No Caltrans Stakeholder has been completed. This will be a part of the project.

22. Identify the primary mode(s)* Select up to two.
⊠ Bike/Pedestrian ⊠ Complete Streets
☐ Freight ☐ Highway
☐ Managed Lanes ☐ ITS
☐ Port ⊠ Transit
☐ Rail (Passenger) ☐ Rail (Freight)
Other (please describe): Environmental Mitigation

23. Identify any secondary project mode(s)
Select all that apply.
☐ Bike/Pedestrian ☐ Complete Streets
⊠ Freight ⊠ Highway
☐ ITS ☐ Port
☐ Transit ☐ Rail (Freight)
☐ Rail (Passenger)
Other (please describe):
553
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
II. Consistency with Statewide Goals & Priorities – Scoring Criteria

24. MODE SHIFT: How does the project promote mode shift, including to rail, transit, or active transportation? Yes. Approximately 5-10% through improvements in bicycle and pedestrian facilities and better access to transit.

25. REDUCE Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): How does the project impact VMT? Estimated at 5%
25a. Does the scope include increasing general-purpose capacity on the State Highway System? (y/n) N

26. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Does the project include and document a meaningful public engagement process that includes community-based participation?
Public Participation will be a part of the planning effort,

27. BENEFITS TO DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY (DAC): Does the project incorporate local communities needs to provide benefits to a DAC?
Yes. The project will mitigate environmental impacts due to flooding and drainage issues, improve access and mobility and create a safer environment for the residents of South Lake Tahoe and tourists visiting the area.

28. IMPROVE SAFETY: Does the project include safety improvements/enhancements to reduce fatalities and severe injuries for all users in alignment with the Safe Systems approach? Yes. The project will provide pedestrian and bicycle facilities and will reduce fatalities and injuries as a result of lack of these facilities.

29. EXPAND ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE (ZEV) INFRASTRUCTURE: Does the project include and/or improve access to ZEV charging or fueling infrastructure?
Yes. The project will include planning for EV charging stations at appropriate locations

30. ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE: Does the project improve climate adaptation and resiliency by addressing one or more climate risk(s)?
Yes. The project will mitigate environmental impacts, impacts to Lake Tahoe and increase resiliency in the community.

31. NATURAL AND WORKING LANDS: How does the project plan to minimize the impact on natural resources and ecosystems?
Yes. The project will have direct positive impact on drainage issues in the City and sediment transport to the South Lake Tahoe Basin.

32. INFILL DEVELOPMENT: Does the project promote infill development and transportation-efficient land use patterns while protecting residents and businesses from displacement? To Some extent, but not significantly.

33. Additional considerations/story telling:

The Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan will seek to address aging or inadequate underground infrastructure (drainage, water supply and sewer) at the same time as providing above-ground mobility, safety and accessibility streetscape improvements. By ensuring that underground infrastructure is updated to protect Lake Tahoe from urban runoff pollution, broadband needs are considered, water supply and fire flow systems are updated, and aging sewer conveyance system issues are resolved before surface mobility improvements are constructed, the master plan will ensure the City’s ‘dig once’ approach to infrastructure upgrades are considered in this comprehensive approach to Complete Streets project planning. 554
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
II. District Contact Information

34. Name (First, Last)* Anush Nejad
Title* Director of Public Works Phone* 530-542-6031
Required:  Letter of Support Request Intake Form (this document)  Letter of Support on Caltrans Letter Head (word document) Optional:  Project Factsheet (highly encouraged)
 Vicinity Map
 Other relevant documents
Important Instructions
Please use this worksheet to collaborate with external partners and compile the information prior to completing the submittal form via Smartsheet. Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Districts must screen each letter of support request PRIOR to submitting the request via Smartsheet.

Districts should only submit requests that are in alignment with Caltrans Goals and Policies and the Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI) Investment Framework.

Submit projects via Smartsheet by February 28, 2022
555
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
Nomination Intake Form Instructions
No. Instructions
1 PROJECT NAME: Enter the project name.
2 REQUESTING AGENCY LEAD APPLICANT: Please list the name of the agency that is submitting the RAISE Application as lead applicant
3 REQUESTING AGENCY CO-APPLICANT: Please list the name(s) of the agency(ies) that is submitting the RAISE Application as the co-applicant(s)
4 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Please list the name of the agency that would be implementing the project if the project is funded through RAISE
5 PLANNING OR CAPITAL GRANT: Please list if the project is competing for the Planning or Capital RAISE pot of funding
6 DISTRICT: Enter the Caltrans district number as a 2-digit. 7 COUNTY: Enter the abbreviate form of the county (i.e. LA, SAC, etc.). If project is in multiple counties, enter all counties separated by forward slash (i.e. SJ/STA). Provide additional details in #13. 8 ROUTE: Enter the route number(s). Use commas to separate multiple routes (ex: “5,99”). For off-system, type “OFF.” Provide additional details, as needed, in #13. 9 START PM: Enter the begin post mile limits. Include prefix or suffix, if applicable. If project is on multiple routes, enter “MULTI” for PM and provide additional details of the locations in #14. 10 END PM: Enter the end post mile limits. Include prefix or suffix, if applicable. If project is on multiple routes, enter “MULTI” for PM and provide additional details of the locations in #14. 11 URBAN/RURAL: Enter if the project is in an urban or rural area according to RAISE 2022 criteria:
https://www.transportation.gov/RAISEgrants/urbanized-areas 12 AREAS OF PERSISTENT POVERTY OR HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES: Enter if your Project is located in an Area of Persistent Poverty or Historically Disadvantaged Communities, as defined by the RAISE 2022 criteria: https://www.transportation.gov/RAISEgrants/raise-areas-persistent-poverty 12a IF YES, WHICH? Enter which area(s) the project falls within (Areas of Persistent Poverty and/or Historically Disadvantaged Communities
13 DESCRIPTION OF AREA OF PERSISTENT POVERTY OR HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY: Clearly and explicitly describe the Project's direct benefits to Areas of Persistent Poverty 14 LOCATION DESCRIPTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a brief description of the project location(s) and description of the proposed project. Include relevant information, as applicable (bike class and lengths, adding/converting lanes, if pricing managed lanes, etc.). Please spell out first instances of acronyms. Include multiple counties, routes, and PM limits, if necessary. 15 CURRENT PHASE: Enter the project’s current phase
16 RAISE 2022 Requesting Phase(s): Enter the project phase(s) the application is requesting RAISE to fund 17 TOTAL PROJECT COST (x$1000): Enter the total project cost (across all phases) 18 RAISE 2022 Request (x$1000): Enter the grant amount that the applicant is requesting from RAISE 19 CONSTRUCTION START DATE (mm/yy): Enter the anticipated construction start date. Enter the year if that is the only known information
20 LIST CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVE(S) BY NAME AND DISTRICT NUMBER: Enter the name of the Congressional Representative and Congressional District number in which the project is located. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members
21 LIST THE HISTORY OF CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP AND CALTRANS STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PROJECT: List the history of Caltrans partnership and stakeholder engagement throughout the life of the project
22 PRIMARY MODE: Select the primary mode(s) of the proposed project. Select up to 2 modes if needed. 23 SECONDARY MODE: Select any secondary project mode(s). 24 MODE SHIFT: The purpose of this question is to identify the Project’s ability to facilitate mode shift. Caltrans is looking to support projects that provide viable, multimodal alternatives to vehicle travel or that eliminate gaps to the first or last mile of multimodal trips. Priority freight projects will facilitate intermodal interchange, transfer, and/or access into or out of a port/rail facility to shift cargo from roadways to 556
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
No. Instructions
rail/marine highway. Priority rural projects will increase transit and passenger rail service through investment in bus service, vanpools, micro-transit or mobility on demands services, park and ride facilities and adjacent passenger rail service. Describe how the project to build towards an integrated, statewide rail and transit network (i.e. transit lane) to provide seamless, affordable, multimodal travel options in all contexts. Describe how the project invests in networks of safe and accessible bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, particularly by closing gaps on portions of the State Highway System that intersect local active transportation and transit networks, or serve as small town or rural main streets, with a focus on investments in low-income and disadvantaged communities. Provide available data/exhibits. 25 REDUCE VMT: The purpose of this question is to determine the Project’s VMT impacts. Caltrans is looking to support projects that do not significantly increase motor vehicle travel, particularly in congested urbanized settings where other mobility options can be provided and where projects are shown to induce significant auto travel. These projects should generally aim to reduce VMT and not induce significant VMT growth (CAPTI page 17). In less congested rural areas, highway capacity expansion can be less likely to induce travel. Nevertheless, the benefits and drawbacks of widening roadways in this context must be weighed carefully. Describe how the project proposes to reduce VMT and include alternatives to highway capacity expansion, such as providing multimodal and non-auto mode options in the corridor, employing pricing strategies, and using technology to optimize operations. Describe if the project considers alternatives to general purpose lane, HOV, and HOT lane additions that may potentially induce demand.

Provide available data/exhibits.
25a DOES THE SCOPE INCLUDE INCREASING GENERAL-PURPOSE CAPACITY ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM? Enter yes if the project is increases general-purpose capacity on the SHS, including aux lanes and interchanges.
26 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: The purpose of this question is to determine if a project adequately includes the needs of underrepresented groups through its public engagement process. Consideration is given to whether a project provided a diverse array of opportunities for members of underrepresented groups, contacted community leaders of underrepresented groups, provided engagement at the appropriate times of project development, adequately documents the public engagement process, ensured adequate resources were allocated to the public engagement process, and demonstrates that the project design or scope was changed to accommodate needs and perspectives provided by the public engagement process. Describe how the project includes or plans to include community-based public participation, including noticed meetings and consultation with local stakeholders, which culminated in the project proposal. Please describe the local participation process and events that occurred or planned; how involvement of disadvantaged community stakeholders resulted in the needs to mitigate disproportionate and adverse health, environmental, social, and economic impacts to minority populations and low-income populations; and if the project was requested and supported by the affected disadvantaged community. Provide available data/exhibits (event dates, approximate attendees), significant support/opposition to the project, major comments raised, and Caltrans’ response to those comments.
27 BENEFITS TO DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY (DAC): The purpose of this question is to determine if the project provides benefits a DAC. Caltrans seeks to support those projects which provide the greatest benefits that serve the most severely disadvantaged communities. Describe how the project proposes to advance equity and reduce or eliminate transportation burdens and/or barriers for low-income communities, communities of color, people with disabilities, and other disadvantaged groups. Describe how the project is expected to directly benefit disadvantaged, low-income communities; and if the project is expected to improve low-cost access to opportunity and/or reduce VMT and traffic volumes in that community. Provide available data/exhibits.
28 SAFETY: The purpose of this question is to identify how the project incorporates safety countermeasures to reduce fatalities and severe injuries of all users toward zero on our roadways. Caltrans seeks to support projects in alignment with the Safe Systems Approach, which involves anticipating human mistakes and designing & managing infrastructure to keep the risk of a mistake low.

Describe how the project includes safety improvements/enhancements to reduce fatalities and injuries of all users toward zero on the State Highway System, railways, and transit systems. Please describe elements 557
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
No. Instructions
that improve or enhance safety, such as context appropriate speeds, prioritizing vulnerable user safety to support mode shift, designing roadways to accommodate potential human errors and injury tolerances that ultimately implements a safe-systems approach, and potential reduction in trips or miles travels that may yield inherent safety benefits. Provide available data/exhibits. 29 EXPAND ZEV INFRASTRUCTURE: The purpose of this question is to evaluate the extent to which the project supports and encourages the use of ZEV’s and alternative fuels. Caltrans seeks to support projects that provide and improve access to ZE charging and alternative fueling infrastructure, especially in rural/remote areas and where key gaps in charging/fueling infrastructure exist. Caltrans looks to support rail projects that provide ZE/alternative fuel l freight or passenger rail projects and freight projects that provide ZE truck chargers or alternative fueling. Describe how the project supports the innovation and development of the ZE market and help ensure ZEVs are accessible to all, particularly to those in more rural or remote communities, if applicable. If the project plans to install new ZE infrastructure, indicate the number of units and potential locations being considered. Provide available data/exhibits. 30 ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE: The purpose of this question is to evaluate how the project addresses identified climate risks and implement adaptation strategies/measures to enhance resilience to climate impact(s) that are occurring or anticipated. All projects are required to demonstrate consideration of and consistency with State goals, and where applicable, regional, or local adaptation plans or policies.

Projects on the SHS should reference Caltrans’ products on climate vulnerability, including the Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation Priority Reports. These data sources may be supplemented as needed to identify climate impacts to adjacent areas beyond the SHS using other State or federal climate data sources. Projected climate impacts for non-highway projects such as passenger/freight rail, seaport, transit, or active transportation projects are not available through Caltrans vulnerability assessments or adaptation priority reports. Those types of projects may use other resources such as Cal-Adapt.org or other local climate data sources to explain vulnerability to a climate change impact. Describe how the project achieves statewide GHG emission reduction targets, increase resilience to climate change, and/or has engaged communities most vulnerable to climate change. Please Indicate if the project area is identified in the District Vulnerability Assessments Report, Adaptation Priorities Report, Corridor Plan, and/or a regional or local climate change adaptation plans. Describe how the project may consider project elements that combat climate change and/or improve existing assets that are potentially exposed to climate change stressors as identified in the aforementioned documents. Describe if the project is identified as an emergency evacuation route or in an emergency plan/hazard mitigation plan and potential improvements using an approach that is supported by state/local emergency services.

Provide available data/exhibits.
31 NATURAL AND WORKING LANDS: The purpose of this question is to measure how the project incorporates nature-based solutions to protect or enhance natural and working lands, which include natural ecosystems and other landscapes like agricultural lands. Specifically, on how the project avoids conversion of natural or working lands to more intensified uses, and/or how it enhances biodiversity. The question also measures how the project supports local and regional conservation planning that focuses development where it already exists, and how the project aligns transportation investments with conservation priorities to reduce transportation’s impact on the natural environment. Response to this criterion is intended to be independent of potential mitigation measures pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or other laws rules or regulations regarding natural resources. Describe how the project proposes to protect natural and working lands from conversion to more intensified uses and enhance biodiversity by supporting local and regional conservation planning that focuses development where it already exists. Describe the extent to which the project may reduce land use development that may consume natural or working lands or focus development that may allow for both development and land preservation. Describe how the project aligns transportation investments with conservation priorities to reduce transportation’s impact on the natural environment. Provide available data/exhibits. 32 INFILL DEVELOPMENT: The purpose of this question is to determine if the Project promotes infill development and land use patterns while protecting residents and businesses from displacement. Development will be 558
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
No. Instructions
considered infill if it lies within dark purple areas of the Heatmap layer in the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's Site Check tool available at https://sitecheck.orp.ca.gov/ and how the project provides opportunity for walking, biking, transit, and providing transportation options to support infill development.

Describe how the project proposes to promote compact infill development and land use patterns while protecting residents and businesses from displacements, especially in disadvantaged communities. 33 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS/STORY TELLING: Please provide other significant information you would like to be considered in the evaluation process that is not covered in other sections of the form, such as project benefits and/or challenges (risks, constraints, etc.), what is the issue(s) the project is trying to solve? How is the project fixing the issue(s)?
34 NAME, TITLE, PHONE: Enter the district contact information that is knowledgeable of the project and can provide or coordinate any additional requests on the project. 559
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
I. General Information

1. Project Name*
Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project

2. Requesting Agency Lead Applicant*
City of South Lake Tahoe

3. Requesting Agency
Co-Applicant(s)*

4. Implementing
Agency*
City of South Lake Tahoe

5. Planning or Capital Grant*
Capital Grant

6. District* 3 7. County* El Dorado 8. Route* OFF 9. Start PM NA 10. End PM NA

11. Urban/Rural Rural 12. Areas of Persistent Poverty or Historically Disadvantaged Community (y/n)* Y
12a. If yes, which? Historically Disadvantaged
Community

13. Description of Area of Persistent Poverty or
Historically Disadvantaged Community
Census Track: 316 is within the City of South Lake
Tahoe. The Project area is along Wildwood Avenue in
the Ruby Way Neighborhood

14. Location Description and Project Description*
The project directly benefits the Disadvantaged Community by reducing flood risk that dramatically impacts residents within low-income apartments and enhances mobility through bicycle and pedestrian access upgrades. The project area includes a segment of the South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail (Dennis T.

Machida Memorial Greenway) in a location that experiences periodic flooding due to the routing of concentrated runoff into eroding and incised channels and failing drainage culverts. The project will improve stormwater quality and reduce flooding in economically and socially disadvantaged neighborhoods.

15. Current Phase*
Design Completed including CEQA document.

16. RAISE 2022 Requesting Phase(s)*
Construction Phase

17. Total Project Cost ($x1000)*
$2,000

18. RAISE 2022 Request ($x1000)*
$1,600

19. Construction Start date (mm/yy)
04/24

20. List Congressional Representative(s) by name and District Number* Tom McClintock - Congressional District 4

21. Describe the extent of past/future Caltrans Stakeholder Engagement and Partnership on the project* The project design included public outreach. Caltrans was not engaged as it does not include State Highway.

22. Identify the primary mode(s)* Select up to two.
⊠ Bike/Pedestrian ⊠ Complete Streets
☐ Freight ☐ Highway
☐ Managed Lanes ☐ ITS
☐ Port ⊠ Transit
☐ Rail (Passenger) ☐ Rail (Freight)
Other (please describe): Environmental Mitigation

23. Identify any secondary project mode(s)
Select all that apply.
☐ Bike/Pedestrian ☐ Complete Streets
⊠ Freight ⊠ Highway
☐ ITS ☐ Port
☐ Transit ☐ Rail (Freight)
☐ Rail (Passenger)
Other (please describe):
560
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
II. Consistency with Statewide Goals & Priorities – Scoring Criteria

24. MODE SHIFT: How does the project promote mode shift, including to rail, transit, or active transportation? Yes. Approximately 5-10% through improvements in bicycle and pedestrian facilities and better access. The project includes construction of a segment of the South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail (Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway, a trial envisioned to create neighbor connectors and an improved active transportation network on the South Shore of Lake Tahoe.

25. REDUCE Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): How does the project impact VMT? Estimated at 2-5%
25a. Does the scope include increasing general-purpose capacity on the State Highway System? (y/n) N

26. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Does the project include and document a meaningful public engagement process that includes community-based participation?
Public Participation was conducted during the project development and design phases.

27. BENEFITS TO DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY (DAC): Does the project incorporate local communities needs to provide benefits to a DAC?
Yes. The project will mitigate existing flooding and drainage issues, improve access and mobility and create a safer environment for the residents of South Lake Tahoe and tourists visiting the area.

28. IMPROVE SAFETY: Does the project include safety improvements/enhancements to reduce fatalities and severe injuries for all users in alignment with the Safe Systems approach? Yes. The project will upgrade pedestrian and bicycle facilities and will reduce fatalities and injuries as a result of the lack of these facilities.

29. EXPAND ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE (ZEV) INFRASTRUCTURE: Does the project include and/or improve access to ZEV charging or fueling infrastructure?
No.

30. ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE: Does the project improve climate adaptation and resiliency by addressing one or more climate risk(s)?
Yes. The project will mitigate environmental impacts, reduce impacts from sediment on the clarity of Lake Tahoe, and increase resiliency in the community. As climate change projections anticipate more extreme weather (increased rain instead of snow), improving drainage infrastructure will alleviate current and future flooding of downstream multi-family residential areas. The project will assist traditionally underserved communities through improved infrastructure for climate resilience.

31. NATURAL AND WORKING LANDS: How does the project plan to minimize the impact on natural resources and ecosystems?
Yes. The project will have a direct positive impact on drainage issues in the City, reduce hillside erosion, and minimize sediment transport to Lake Tahoe.

32. INFILL DEVELOPMENT: Does the project promote infill development and transportation-efficient land use patterns while protecting residents and businesses from displacement? No.

33. Additional considerations/story telling:

The project was developed to address hillside drainage problems that would have impacted the future alignment of the South Tahoe Greenway Shared Use Trail (Dennis T. Machida Memorial Greenway) by combining drainage, water quality, and bike path improvements into one comprehensive project. The project includes climate change mitigation (encouraging active transportation) and climate resilience. 561
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
II. District Contact Information

34. Name (First, Last)* Anush Nejad
Title* Director of Public Works Phone* 530-542-6031
Required:  Letter of Support Request Intake Form (this document)  Letter of Support on Caltrans Letter Head (word document) Optional:  Project Factsheet (highly encouraged)
 Vicinity Map
 Other relevant documents
Important Instructions
Please use this worksheet to collaborate with external partners and compile the information prior to completing the submittal form via Smartsheet. Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Districts must screen each letter of support request PRIOR to submitting the request via Smartsheet.

Districts should only submit requests that are in alignment with Caltrans Goals and Policies and the Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI) Investment Framework.

Submit projects via Smartsheet by February 28, 2022
562
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
Nomination Intake Form Instructions
No. Instructions
1 PROJECT NAME: Enter the project name.
2 REQUESTING AGENCY LEAD APPLICANT: Please list the name of the agency that is submitting the RAISE Application as lead applicant
3 REQUESTING AGENCY CO-APPLICANT: Please list the name(s) of the agency(ies) that is submitting the RAISE Application as the co-applicant(s)
4 IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Please list the name of the agency that would be implementing the project if the project is funded through RAISE
5 PLANNING OR CAPITAL GRANT: Please list if the project is competing for the Planning or Capital RAISE pot of funding
6 DISTRICT: Enter the Caltrans district number as a 2-digit. 7 COUNTY: Enter the abbreviate form of the county (i.e. LA, SAC, etc.). If project is in multiple counties, enter all counties separated by forward slash (i.e. SJ/STA). Provide additional details in #13. 8 ROUTE: Enter the route number(s). Use commas to separate multiple routes (ex: “5,99”). For off-system, type “OFF.” Provide additional details, as needed, in #13. 9 START PM: Enter the begin post mile limits. Include prefix or suffix, if applicable. If project is on multiple routes, enter “MULTI” for PM and provide additional details of the locations in #14. 10 END PM: Enter the end post mile limits. Include prefix or suffix, if applicable. If project is on multiple routes, enter “MULTI” for PM and provide additional details of the locations in #14. 11 URBAN/RURAL: Enter if the project is in an urban or rural area according to RAISE 2022 criteria:
https://www.transportation.gov/RAISEgrants/urbanized-areas 12 AREAS OF PERSISTENT POVERTY OR HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES: Enter if your Project is located in an Area of Persistent Poverty or Historically Disadvantaged Communities, as defined by the RAISE 2022 criteria: https://www.transportation.gov/RAISEgrants/raise-areas-persistent-poverty 12a IF YES, WHICH? Enter which area(s) the project falls within (Areas of Persistent Poverty and/or Historically Disadvantaged Communities
13 DESCRIPTION OF AREA OF PERSISTENT POVERTY OR HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY: Clearly and explicitly describe the Project's direct benefits to Areas of Persistent Poverty 14 LOCATION DESCRIPTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a brief description of the project location(s) and description of the proposed project. Include relevant information, as applicable (bike class and lengths, adding/converting lanes, if pricing managed lanes, etc.). Please spell out first instances of acronyms. Include multiple counties, routes, and PM limits, if necessary. 15 CURRENT PHASE: Enter the project’s current phase
16 RAISE 2022 Requesting Phase(s): Enter the project phase(s) the application is requesting RAISE to fund 17 TOTAL PROJECT COST (x$1000): Enter the total project cost (across all phases) 18 RAISE 2022 Request (x$1000): Enter the grant amount that the applicant is requesting from RAISE 19 CONSTRUCTION START DATE (mm/yy): Enter the anticipated construction start date. Enter the year if that is the only known information
20 LIST CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVE(S) BY NAME AND DISTRICT NUMBER: Enter the name of the Congressional Representative and Congressional District number in which the project is located. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members
21 LIST THE HISTORY OF CALTRANS PARTNERSHIP AND CALTRANS STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PROJECT: List the history of Caltrans partnership and stakeholder engagement throughout the life of the project
22 PRIMARY MODE: Select the primary mode(s) of the proposed project. Select up to 2 modes if needed. 23 SECONDARY MODE: Select any secondary project mode(s). 24 MODE SHIFT: The purpose of this question is to identify the Project’s ability to facilitate mode shift. Caltrans is looking to support projects that provide viable, multimodal alternatives to vehicle travel or that eliminate gaps to the first or last mile of multimodal trips. Priority freight projects will facilitate intermodal interchange, transfer, and/or access into or out of a port/rail facility to shift cargo from roadways to 563
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
No. Instructions
rail/marine highway. Priority rural projects will increase transit and passenger rail service through investment in bus service, vanpools, micro-transit or mobility on demands services, park and ride facilities and adjacent passenger rail service. Describe how the project to build towards an integrated, statewide rail and transit network (i.e. transit lane) to provide seamless, affordable, multimodal travel options in all contexts. Describe how the project invests in networks of safe and accessible bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, particularly by closing gaps on portions of the State Highway System that intersect local active transportation and transit networks, or serve as small town or rural main streets, with a focus on investments in low-income and disadvantaged communities. Provide available data/exhibits. 25 REDUCE VMT: The purpose of this question is to determine the Project’s VMT impacts. Caltrans is looking to support projects that do not significantly increase motor vehicle travel, particularly in congested urbanized settings where other mobility options can be provided and where projects are shown to induce significant auto travel. These projects should generally aim to reduce VMT and not induce significant VMT growth (CAPTI page 17). In less congested rural areas, highway capacity expansion can be less likely to induce travel. Nevertheless, the benefits and drawbacks of widening roadways in this context must be weighed carefully. Describe how the project proposes to reduce VMT and include alternatives to highway capacity expansion, such as providing multimodal and non-auto mode options in the corridor, employing pricing strategies, and using technology to optimize operations. Describe if the project considers alternatives to general purpose lane, HOV, and HOT lane additions that may potentially induce demand.

Provide available data/exhibits.
25a DOES THE SCOPE INCLUDE INCREASING GENERAL-PURPOSE CAPACITY ON THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM? Enter yes if the project is increases general-purpose capacity on the SHS, including aux lanes and interchanges.
26 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: The purpose of this question is to determine if a project adequately includes the needs of underrepresented groups through its public engagement process. Consideration is given to whether a project provided a diverse array of opportunities for members of underrepresented groups, contacted community leaders of underrepresented groups, provided engagement at the appropriate times of project development, adequately documents the public engagement process, ensured adequate resources were allocated to the public engagement process, and demonstrates that the project design or scope was changed to accommodate needs and perspectives provided by the public engagement process. Describe how the project includes or plans to include community-based public participation, including noticed meetings and consultation with local stakeholders, which culminated in the project proposal. Please describe the local participation process and events that occurred or planned; how involvement of disadvantaged community stakeholders resulted in the needs to mitigate disproportionate and adverse health, environmental, social, and economic impacts to minority populations and low-income populations; and if the project was requested and supported by the affected disadvantaged community. Provide available data/exhibits (event dates, approximate attendees), significant support/opposition to the project, major comments raised, and Caltrans’ response to those comments.
27 BENEFITS TO DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY (DAC): The purpose of this question is to determine if the project provides benefits a DAC. Caltrans seeks to support those projects which provide the greatest benefits that serve the most severely disadvantaged communities. Describe how the project proposes to advance equity and reduce or eliminate transportation burdens and/or barriers for low-income communities, communities of color, people with disabilities, and other disadvantaged groups. Describe how the project is expected to directly benefit disadvantaged, low-income communities; and if the project is expected to improve low-cost access to opportunity and/or reduce VMT and traffic volumes in that community. Provide available data/exhibits.
28 SAFETY: The purpose of this question is to identify how the project incorporates safety countermeasures to reduce fatalities and severe injuries of all users toward zero on our roadways. Caltrans seeks to support projects in alignment with the Safe Systems Approach, which involves anticipating human mistakes and designing & managing infrastructure to keep the risk of a mistake low.

Describe how the project includes safety improvements/enhancements to reduce fatalities and injuries of all users toward zero on the State Highway System, railways, and transit systems. Please describe elements 564
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
No. Instructions
that improve or enhance safety, such as context appropriate speeds, prioritizing vulnerable user safety to support mode shift, designing roadways to accommodate potential human errors and injury tolerances that ultimately implements a safe-systems approach, and potential reduction in trips or miles travels that may yield inherent safety benefits. Provide available data/exhibits. 29 EXPAND ZEV INFRASTRUCTURE: The purpose of this question is to evaluate the extent to which the project supports and encourages the use of ZEV’s and alternative fuels. Caltrans seeks to support projects that provide and improve access to ZE charging and alternative fueling infrastructure, especially in rural/remote areas and where key gaps in charging/fueling infrastructure exist. Caltrans looks to support rail projects that provide ZE/alternative fuel l freight or passenger rail projects and freight projects that provide ZE truck chargers or alternative fueling. Describe how the project supports the innovation and development of the ZE market and help ensure ZEVs are accessible to all, particularly to those in more rural or remote communities, if applicable. If the project plans to install new ZE infrastructure, indicate the number of units and potential locations being considered. Provide available data/exhibits. 30 ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE: The purpose of this question is to evaluate how the project addresses identified climate risks and implement adaptation strategies/measures to enhance resilience to climate impact(s) that are occurring or anticipated. All projects are required to demonstrate consideration of and consistency with State goals, and where applicable, regional, or local adaptation plans or policies.

Projects on the SHS should reference Caltrans’ products on climate vulnerability, including the Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation Priority Reports. These data sources may be supplemented as needed to identify climate impacts to adjacent areas beyond the SHS using other State or federal climate data sources. Projected climate impacts for non-highway projects such as passenger/freight rail, seaport, transit, or active transportation projects are not available through Caltrans vulnerability assessments or adaptation priority reports. Those types of projects may use other resources such as Cal-Adapt.org or other local climate data sources to explain vulnerability to a climate change impact. Describe how the project achieves statewide GHG emission reduction targets, increase resilience to climate change, and/or has engaged communities most vulnerable to climate change. Please Indicate if the project area is identified in the District Vulnerability Assessments Report, Adaptation Priorities Report, Corridor Plan, and/or a regional or local climate change adaptation plans. Describe how the project may consider project elements that combat climate change and/or improve existing assets that are potentially exposed to climate change stressors as identified in the aforementioned documents. Describe if the project is identified as an emergency evacuation route or in an emergency plan/hazard mitigation plan and potential improvements using an approach that is supported by state/local emergency services.

Provide available data/exhibits.
31 NATURAL AND WORKING LANDS: The purpose of this question is to measure how the project incorporates nature-based solutions to protect or enhance natural and working lands, which include natural ecosystems and other landscapes like agricultural lands. Specifically, on how the project avoids conversion of natural or working lands to more intensified uses, and/or how it enhances biodiversity. The question also measures how the project supports local and regional conservation planning that focuses development where it already exists, and how the project aligns transportation investments with conservation priorities to reduce transportation’s impact on the natural environment. Response to this criterion is intended to be independent of potential mitigation measures pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or other laws rules or regulations regarding natural resources. Describe how the project proposes to protect natural and working lands from conversion to more intensified uses and enhance biodiversity by supporting local and regional conservation planning that focuses development where it already exists. Describe the extent to which the project may reduce land use development that may consume natural or working lands or focus development that may allow for both development and land preservation. Describe how the project aligns transportation investments with conservation priorities to reduce transportation’s impact on the natural environment. Provide available data/exhibits. 32 INFILL DEVELOPMENT: The purpose of this question is to determine if the Project promotes infill development and land use patterns while protecting residents and businesses from displacement. Development will be 565
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Caltrans Letter of Support Request Intake Form

DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Rev 2/7/2022
No. Instructions
considered infill if it lies within dark purple areas of the Heatmap layer in the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's Site Check tool available at https://sitecheck.orp.ca.gov/ and how the project provides opportunity for walking, biking, transit, and providing transportation options to support infill development.

Describe how the project proposes to promote compact infill development and land use patterns while protecting residents and businesses from displacements, especially in disadvantaged communities. 33 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS/STORY TELLING: Please provide other significant information you would like to be considered in the evaluation process that is not covered in other sections of the form, such as project benefits and/or challenges (risks, constraints, etc.), what is the issue(s) the project is trying to solve? How is the project fixing the issue(s)?
34 NAME, TITLE, PHONE: Enter the district contact information that is knowledgeable of the project and can provide or coordinate any additional requests on the project. 566
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 1
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
March 15, 2022
Approval of Grant Application for Grant Funds from the RAISE Grant Fund Program

BACKGROUND
A. The U.S. Department of Transportation has announced the availability of Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant for the Fiscal Year 2022; and B. The RAISE Grant is a part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act or Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) passed by the U.S. Congress; and C. BIL authorized and appropriated $1.5 billion for FY 2022 for the Local and Regional Projects Assistance Program; and
D. The Department of Transportation (DOT) will award at least $75million eligible planning and design projects; and
E. The US DOT will also award at least $15 million for projects in areas of historically disadvantaged communities, which includes a portion of South Lake Tahoe.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Approves filing of two grants Applications for the FY 2022 RAISE Grant program.

2. States that the RAISE grant will include a Planning Study for Complete Street Programmatic Master Plan and a Construction Project for the Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project.

3. Certifies the Project is consistent with the Applicant’s general plan or the equivalent planning document.

4. Commits to the matching funds in the total amount of $480,000 for the Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan and $400,000 for the Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project from the undesignated General Funds toward both grants, if the grants are awarded.

5. Appoints the Director of Public Works as an agent to submit all documents, including but not limited to Applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and so on, which may be necessary to complete the Projects.

6. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and guidelines.
567
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 1
Adopted by the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe on March 15, 2022, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
_______________________________ Date: _______________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council
568
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Agenda Item #: 17
Agenda Item: Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority
Executive Summary: Approval of the attached resolution and Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement would allow the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe to become a member of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency to withdraw from the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority to replace Successor Agency with Parking Authority.

Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, City Manager
Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, City Manager (530) 542-6043 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Parking Finance JPA Amendment.docx
02-Resolution - Parking Finance JPA Amendment.docx
03-Amendment to Parking Finance Authority JPA.docx
04-JPA Agreement - SLT.pdf
569
Staff Report – March 15, 2022
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Title: Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, City Manager (530) 542-6043 Background:

Pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, Government Code Section 6500, et seq. (the “Joint Powers Act”), the City and the Redevelopment Agency in 1989 created the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority (the “Financing Authority”), by entering into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the “JPA Agreement”). Under the Joint Powers Act, the Financing Authority has all of the powers common to its members, as well as additional, independent powers under the Joint Powers Act. The Joint Powers Act authorizes the Financing Authority to assist public agencies, such as the City and its related entities, in the financing and refinancing of public capital improvements.

In the past, the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority has assisted the City in the issuance of 2016 Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, as well as 2012 Certificates of Participation, the proceeds of which were used to finance streets and other capital improvements within the City. It is expected that in the future, the assistance of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority will again be needed to assist the City in securing financing for the construction of new projects, including the new recreation center.

Issue and Discussion:

The former Redevelopment Agency’s interest in the JPA Agreement was assigned to the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency by operation of AB X1 26, which enacted the Dissolution Act. The Dissolution Act, as amended by AB 1484, enacted by the State Legislature on June 27, 2012, and as amended further by SB 107, enacted by the State Legislature on September 22, 2015, introduces complications to certain bond financing assisted by the Financing Authority. California Health and Safety Code Section 34187 specifies that the Successor Agency’s existence will terminate within a few months after the final payment of debt of the former Redevelopment Agency (or the disposal of all real property and resolution of all outstanding litigation). The last debt of the Redevelopment Agency matures in 2037, and assuming that all real property has been disposed of and that there is no litigation at the time, the Successor Agency’s existence will terminate within approximately 15 years from now. 570
-2-
Staff Report – March 15, 2022
To finance or refinance public capital improvements of the City and its related entities, it is expected that additional bonded indebtedness or obligations will be issued with the assistance of the Financing Authority, and having terms and maturities extending beyond termination of the Successor Agency. Amendment of the JPA Agreement to add another member is necessary in order to preserve the continued existence of the Financing Authority after the termination of the Successor Agency’s existence. The 2012 Certificates of Participation have a term of longer than 15 years, and the financing for the recreation center Project will have a term of longer than 15 years. Therefore, it is necessary to add the Parking Authority as a member to the Financing Authority to assure the financial feasibility of these important projects proposed to be financed by bonds, as well as other future capital improvement projects of the City.

The attached Amendment No. 1 to the JPA Agreement would add the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe as a member of the Financing Authority and withdraw and terminate the Successor Agency as a member of the Financing Authority. Amendment No. 1 would facilitate the continued existence of the Financing Authority beyond the termination of the Successor Agency. In addition, the Successor Agency would no longer be subject to provisions of the JPA Agreement that could require the Successor Agency to contribute funds in the future. To date, no financial contributions have been required from the former Redevelopment Agency or the Successor Agency under such provisions.

Financial Implications:

By withdrawal of the Successor Agency from the Financing Authority, the Successor Agency will no longer be subject to potential financial contribution requirements under the JPA Agreement. By addition of the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe to the JPA Agreement, the Financing Authority will continue in existence beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, thereby allowing the Financing Authority to continue to assist the City and its related entities in bond financings for significant public benefits, including (a) demonstrable savings in effective interest rate or bond issuance costs, (b) significant reductions in effective user charges levied, (c) employment benefits from undertaking the project in a timely fashion, or (d) more efficient delivery of local agency services to residential and commercial development.

Environmental Considerations:

None.

Policy Implications:

None.
571
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
March 15, 2022
Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority

BACKGROUND
A. The City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”) and the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Agency”) entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989 (the “Original Agreement”), establishing the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority (the “PFA”) as a joint powers agency pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act (Government Code Sections 6500 et seq.) (the “Act”).

B. The Original Agreement was made pursuant to the Act, to provide for the joint exercise of powers common to the members of the PFA, and the establishment of a vehicle to reduce local borrowing costs and promote the greater use of existing and new financial instruments and mechanisms, and undertake the financing of public capital improvements and related capital improvements and the acquisition of real and personal property for the members of the PFA and other public agencies within the State.

C. Pursuant to Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code (enacted by Chapter 5 of the Statutes of 2011, ABX1 26), all redevelopment agencies in the State of California, including the Former Agency, dissolved as of February 1, 2012, the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) was established as the successor entity to the Former Agency, and the Oversight Board to the Successor Agency (the “Oversight Board”) was constituted.

D. The Successor Agency is tasked with the wind-down of the Former Agency’s affairs.

E. There has been prepared an Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the “Amendment”), by and among the City, the Successor Agency and the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “Parking Authority”), pursuant to which: (i) the Successor Agency will withdraw as a member of the PFA and the Parking Authority will become a new member of the PFA, and (ii) certain provisions of the Original Agreement will be updated.

F. The Successor Agency’s withdrawal as a member of the PFA is in furtherance of the wind-down of the Former Agency’s affairs.

G. The PFA has previously issued bonds, some of which remain outstanding as of the date hereof.
572
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 2 of 2
H. The inclusion of the Parking Authority as a member to the PFA will preserve the existence of the PFA (thereby avoiding any disruption with respect to the outstanding PFA bonds), while allowing the Successor Agency to withdraw its membership.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Approves the form of Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the “Amendment No. 1”), dated as of March 15, 2022, by and among the City, the Successor Agency, and the Parking Authority, and authorizes and directs the Mayor of the City of South Lake Tahoe, for and on behalf of the City, to execute and deliver the Amendment No. 1 in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk and presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the Mayor of the City Council may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by his execution and delivery thereof; provided however, that such execution and delivery shall occur after the effectiveness (pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179(h)) of the Oversight Board’s resolution approving the execution and delivery of the Amendment No. 1.

2. Directs the City Clerk to cause a copy of the Amendment No. 1 to be filed with the California Secretary of State pursuant to Section 6503.5 of the Joint Powers Act and with the California Controller pursuant to Section 6503.6 of the Joint Powers Act.

3. Directs that this Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on March 15, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
573
-1-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
with respect to the

SOUTH TAHOE JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
This Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (this “Amendment No. 1”) is dated as of March 15, 2022 for reference purposes, and is made by and among the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”), the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”), and the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “Parking Authority”), to amend that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989 (the “JPA Agreement”).

RECITALS:

A. The Joint Exercise of Powers Act, being California Government Code Section 6500, et seq. (the “Joint Powers Act”), provides that public agencies by agreement may jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties. The Parking Authority is a “public agency” within the meaning of that term under Section 6502 of the Joint Powers Act, and as such, is eligible to enter into this Agreement.

B. Pursuant to Article 4 of the Joint Powers Act (also known as the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985), an authority created pursuant to Article 1 of the Joint Powers Act has additional, independent powers under the Joint Powers Act, including the power to issue bonds to pay the cost of any public capital improvement, and the power to make secured or unsecured loans to a local agency, including the City and the Parking Authority, in connection with the financing of public capital improvements and to refinance indebtedness incurred in connection with public capital improvements undertaken and completed, and may purchase bonds issued by any local agency at a public or private sale and such bonds may be held by the authority or sold to public or private purchasers at public or negotiated sales.

C. Pursuant to the Joint Powers Act, the City and the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Redevelopment Agency”) have heretofore entered into the JPA Agreement, pursuant to which the public entity known as the “South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority” was created.

D. On June 29, 2011, Assembly Bill No. 16 was enacted as Chapter 5 of Statutes of 2011 (“AB 26”), pursuant to which all redevelopment agencies in the State of California were statutorily dissolved as of February 1, 2012, including the Former Redevelopment Agency, and the Former Redevelopment Agency’s interests in and obligations under the JPA Agreement were assigned to the Successor Agency by operation of the law enacted by AB 26, including but not limited to California Health and Safety Code Section 34178(b)(3).

E. California Health and Safety Code Section 34187(b) provides for the dissolution of the Successor Agency within several months of the final retirement or payment of all enforceable 574
-2-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
obligations of the Former Redevelopment Agency, disposal of all real property, and resolution of all outstanding litigation of the Successor Agency.

F. There continues to be a need within the City, consistent with the need described in the declarations of the State Legislature set forth in Article 4 of the Joint Powers Act, to expand, upgrade, and otherwise improve the public capital facilities of local government necessary to support the rehabilitation and construction of residential and economic development. The needs of local government for financing these facilities greatly exceed the amount of funds available from existing state, local, and federal sources.

G. The needs of the City to expand, upgrade, and otherwise improve the public capital facilities are expected to continue beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, and bonded indebtedness or other obligations that may be issued with the assistance of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority are expected to have terms and maturities extending beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, so it is necessary to add the Parking Authority as a member of the JPA Agreement in order to continue the existence of the Authority.

H. The common powers of the City and the Parking Authority include the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, refinancing, or development of public parking facilities and for the provision of capital improvements in connection with and determined necessary to the public parking facilities; the power to purchase bonds, notes or other obligations; the power to acquire and dispose of real and personal property; the power to pay for the cost of publicly owned improvements in connection with and determined necessary to the public parking facilities; and the power to accept financial assistance from various public sources. The City and the Parking Authority desire to jointly exercise certain powers common to the parties, as set forth herein, including the foregoing and including the expansion, upgrading and improvement of said public capital improvements, and to facilitate the continued existence of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority, which may also exercise its independent powers authorized by the Joint Powers Act.

I. The Parking Authority desires to enter into this Amendment No. 1 to become a party to the JPA Agreement in furtherance of the Joint Powers Act, including Article 4 thereof, and the Successor Agency desires to withdraw from the JPA Agreement.

J. The inclusion of the Parking Authority as a member to the Authority will preserve the existence of the Authority (thereby avoiding any disruption with respect to the outstanding Authority bonds), while allowing the Successor Agency to withdraw its membership.

K. In furtherance of the purposes of the JPA Agreement and the Joint Powers Act, including Article 4 thereof, and pursuant to Section 16 of the JPA Agreement, the City and the Successor Agency desire to enter into this Amendment No. 1 to: (i) add the Parking Authority as a party to the JPA Agreement, (ii) provide for the withdrawal of the Successor Agency from the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and the JPA Agreement, and (iii) certain updates to the JPA Agreement, including clarifying changes necessitated by all of the foregoing. 575
-3-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
NOW, THEREFORE, the City, the Successor Agency, and the Parking Authority agree as follows:

Section 1. Amendments to the JPA Agreement.

A. The JPA Agreement is hereby amended to include the Parking Authority as a party to the JPA Agreement. By its signature to this Amendment No. 1, the Parking Authority agrees to be a party to the JPA Agreement and accepts the terms of the JPA Agreement.

B. The JPA Agreement is hereby amended to remove the Former Redevelopment Agency as succeeded by the Successor Agency, as assignee by operation of law to the Former Redevelopment Agency, as a member of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and as a party of the JPA Agreement and thus terminate its membership in the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority.

C. The recitals of the JPA Agreement are hereby amended to add the following recital:

WHEREAS, this Agreement has been amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989, to reflect the addition of the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe as a member of the Authority and as a party to this Agreement and to reflect the withdrawal of the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency, as successor to the Agency by operation of law upon the Agency’s statutory dissolution, from membership of the Authority and the JPA Agreement.”
D. Section 1 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended to add the following additional defined terms:
“Amendment No. 1” means that certain Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of January 3, 1989, by and among the City, the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency, as successor to the former Agency, and the Parking Authority. “Local Agency” means a Member, or an agency or subdivision of that Member, sponsoring a project of Public Capital Improvements, or any city, county, city and county, authority, district, or public corporation of the State of California. “Member” means originally, the City and the Agency, and any other member who may be become a member of the Authority, including but not limited to the Parking Authority, which was added as a member pursuant to Amendment No. 1.
“Parking Authority” means the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe, a public body, corporate and politic, duly organized and validly existing pursuant to the Constitution of the State of California and the Parking Law of 1949. 576
-4-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
“Parking Law of 1949” means the Parking Law of 1949, being California Streets and Highways Code Section 32500, et seq., as amended from time to time. “Public Capital Improvements” has the meaning given to such term in Section 6585 of the Law, as in effect on the date hereof, and as hereafter amended.

E. Section 2 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:
“Section 2. PURPOSE
This Agreement is made for the joint exercise of powers common to its Members, and for other purposes as permitted under the Law. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the financing of Public Capital Improvements, and working capital requirements of a Local Agency through the acquisition by the Authority of such Public Capital Improvements and the leasing, purchasing or selling thereof to a Local Agency and/or the purchase by the Authority of Obligations of a Local Agency pursuant to bond purchase agreements and/or the lending of funds by the Authority to a Local Agency.”
F. Section 3 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“SECTION 3. TERM
This Agreement shall become effective as of the date hereof and shall continue in full force and effect until terminated by the parties hereto pursuant to a supplemental agreement executed by the Members; provided, however, that in no event shall this Agreement terminate while any notes or bonds of the Authority remain outstanding, or while the Authority owns or holds any interest in a Public Capital Improvement.”
G. Subsection C.(1) of Section 4 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“C. Meetings of the Board
(1) Regular Meetings. “Regular meetings of the Board shall be held on the same day and at the same time and place as the regular meetings of the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe, so long as an agenda for such meeting is posted at least 72 hours in advance of such meeting (or such other length of period as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act). If the Board of Directors has no business to conduct on a date when a Regular Meeting would otherwise be held, no agenda for the Board of Directors meeting shall be posted and such Regular Meeting shall be automatically cancelled.”
577
-5-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
H. Except for the Recitals of the JPA Agreement and the defined terms of the JPA Agreement amended or added by Section 1.D. of this Amendment No. 1, which shall read as set forth in such Section 1.D., and except as otherwise amended by the foregoing provisions of this Section 1, all references in the JPA Agreement to the “Agency” are hereby amended and restated to refer to the “Parking Authority.”
Section 2. JPA Agreement to Remain in Effect. Save and except as expressly amended by this Amendment No. 1, the JPA Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 3. Filing with Secretary of State and State Controller. The Executive Director of the Authority shall cause to be filed, or shall confirm the filing of: (1) a notice of this Amendment No. 1 with the office of the Secretary of State within 30 days of its effective date, as required by Section 6503.5 of the Joint Powers Act, and (ii) a copy of this Amendment No. 1 together with the JPA Agreement with the Controller and the local agency formation commission in the County of El Dorado as required by Section 6503.6 of the Joint Powers Act.

Section 4. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in counterparts, and photocopies or facsimile copies of this Amendment No. 1 may be used as originals.

Section 5. Effective Date. The effective date of this Amendment No. 1 shall be the date upon which the resolution of the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency approving this Amendment No. 1 is effective pursuant to Sections 34179(h) and 34181(f) of the California Health and Safety Code.
[signatures on next page]
578
-6-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
ATTEST:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SOUTH TAHOE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Devin Middlebrook, Chair
ATTEST:

Susan Blankenship, Secretary

PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE
TAHOE
Cristi Creegan, Chair
ATTEST:

Susan Blankenship, Secretary
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Agenda Item #: 18
Agenda Item: Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority
Executive Summary: Approval of the attached resolution and Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement would allow the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe to become a member of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency to withdraw from the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Acting as the Board of the South Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency, Pass a Resolution Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority to replace Successor Agency with Parking Authority.

Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Executive Director Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Executive Director (530) 542-6043 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - STRSA Joint Powers Amendment.docx
02-STRSA Resolution - Joint Powers Finance Amendment.docx 03-STRSA Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement (Exh. A to Reso).docx 04-JPA Agreement - SLT.pdf
597
Staff Report – March 15, 2022
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to South Tahoe Redevelopment
Successor Agency
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Title: Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority.

Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Executive Director (530) 542-6043 Background:

Pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, Government Code Section 6500, et seq. (the “Joint Powers Act”), the City and the Redevelopment Agency in 1989 created the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority (the “Financing Authority”), by entering into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the “JPA Agreement”). Under the Joint Powers Act, the Financing Authority has all of the powers common to its members, as well as additional, independent powers under the Joint Powers Act. The Joint Powers Act authorizes the Financing Authority to assist public agencies, such as the City and its related entities, in the financing and refinancing of public capital improvements.

In the past, the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority has assisted the City in the issuance of 2016 Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, as well as 2012 Certificates of Participation, the proceeds of which were used to finance streets and other capital improvements within the City. It is expected that in the future, the assistance of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority will again be needed to assist the City in securing financing for the construction of new projects, including the new recreation center.

Issue and Discussion:

The former Redevelopment Agency’s interest in the JPA Agreement was assigned to the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency by operation of AB X1 26, which enacted the Dissolution Act. The Dissolution Act, as amended by AB 1484, enacted by the State Legislature on June 27, 2012, and as amended further by SB 107, enacted by the State Legislature on September 22, 2015, introduces complications to certain bond financing assisted by the Financing Authority. California Health and Safety Code Section 34187 specifies that the Successor Agency’s existence will terminate within a few months after the final payment of debt of the former Redevelopment Agency (or the disposal of all real property and resolution of all outstanding litigation). The last debt of the Redevelopment Agency matures in 2037, and assuming that all real property has been disposed of and that there is no litigation at the time, the Successor Agency’s existence will terminate within approximately 15 years from now. 598
-2-
Staff Report – March 15, 2022
To finance or refinance public capital improvements of the City and its related entities, it is expected that additional bonded indebtedness or obligations will be issued with the assistance of the Financing Authority, and having terms and maturities extending beyond termination of the Successor Agency. Amendment of the JPA Agreement to add another member is necessary in order to preserve the continued existence of the Financing Authority after the termination of the Successor Agency’s existence. The 2012 Certificates of Participation have a term of longer than 15 years, and the financing for the recreation center Project will have a term of longer than 15 years. Therefore, it is necessary to add the Parking Authority as a member to the Financing Authority to assure the financial feasibility of these important projects proposed to be financed by bonds, as well as other future capital improvement projects of the City.

The attached Amendment No. 1 to the JPA Agreement would add the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe as a member of the Financing Authority and withdraw and terminate the Successor Agency as a member of the Financing Authority. Amendment No. 1 would facilitate the continued existence of the Financing Authority beyond the termination of the Successor Agency. In addition, the Successor Agency would no longer be subject to provisions of the JPA Agreement that could require the Successor Agency to contribute funds in the future. To date, no financial contributions have been required from the former Redevelopment Agency or the Successor Agency under such provisions.

Financial Implications:

By withdrawal of the Successor Agency from the Financing Authority, the Successor Agency will no longer be subject to potential financial contribution requirements under the JPA Agreement. By addition of the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe to the JPA Agreement, the Financing Authority will continue in existence beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, thereby allowing the Financing Authority to continue to assist the City and its related entities in bond financings for significant public benefits, including (a) demonstrable savings in effective interest rate or bond issuance costs, (b) significant reductions in effective user charges levied, (c) employment benefits from undertaking the project in a timely fashion, or (d) more efficient delivery of local agency services to residential and commercial development.

Environmental Considerations:

None.

Policy Implications:

None.
599
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 4
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the
South Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency
March 15, 2022
Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority

BACKGROUND
A. The City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”) and the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Agency”) entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989 (the “Original Agreement”), establishing the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority (the “PFA”) as a joint powers agency pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act (Government Code Sections 6500 et seq.) (the “Act”).

B. The Original Agreement was made pursuant to the Act, to provide for the joint exercise of powers common to the members of the PFA, and the establishment of a vehicle to reduce local borrowing costs and promote the greater use of existing and new financial instruments and mechanisms, and undertake the financing of public capital improvements and related capital improvements and the acquisition of real and personal property for the members of the PFA and other public agencies within the State.

C. Pursuant to Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code (enacted by Chapter 5 of the Statutes of 2011, ABX1 26), all redevelopment agencies in the State of California, including the Former Agency, dissolved as of February 1, 2012, the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) was established as the successor entity to the Former Agency, and the Oversight Board to the Successor Agency (the “Oversight Board”) was constituted.

D. The Successor Agency is tasked with the wind-down of the Former Agency’s affairs.

E. There has been prepared an Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the “Amendment”), by and among the City, the Successor Agency and the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “Parking Authority”), pursuant to which: (i) the Successor Agency will withdraw as a member of the PFA and the Parking Authority will become a new member of the PFA, and (ii) certain provisions of the Original Agreement will be updated.

F. The Successor Agency’s withdrawal as a member of the PFA is in furtherance of the wind-down of the Former Agency’s affairs.

G. The PFA has previously issued bonds, some of which remain outstanding as of the date hereof.
600
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 2 of 4
H. The inclusion of the Parking Authority as a member to the PFA will preserve the existence of the PFA (thereby avoiding any disruption with respect to the outstanding PFA bonds), while allowing the Successor Agency to withdraw its membership.

I. This Resolution is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and the State CEQA Guidelines set forth in California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000 et seq., (the “Guidelines”), because it constitutes organizational or administrative activities of local government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5)). Because this Resolution is not a “project” for CEQA purposes, it is not subject to CEQA requirements.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the South Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency Board:

1. Hereby approves the Successor Agency’s membership withdrawal from the PFA.

2. Hereby approves the Amendment, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

3. Hereby requests the Oversight Board to approve the Successor Agency’s execution and delivery of the Amendment, and directs the Successor Agency Secretary to transmit this Resolution to the Oversight Board for consideration at the earliest possible date.

4. Hereby directs and authorizes each of the Chair, the Vice Chair and the Executive Director (each an “Authorized Officer”), acting individually, to execute and deliver, for and in the name of the Successor Agency, the Amendment, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with such changes therein as the Authorized Officer executing the same may approve (such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof); provided that such execution and delivery shall occur after the effectiveness (pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179(h)) of the Oversight Board’s resolution approving the execution and delivery of the Amendment.

5. Hereby authorizes the Authorized Officers and all other officers of the Successor Agency, jointly and severally, to do all things, including the execution and delivery of documents and instruments, which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution and the Amendment.

6. Directs that this Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. 601
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 3 of 4
Adopted by the Board of Directors of the South Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency on March 15, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Chair
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, Secretary
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
602
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 4 of 4

EXHIBIT A
Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement
(South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority)
(see attached)
603
-1-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
with respect to the

SOUTH TAHOE JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
This Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (this “Amendment No. 1”) is dated as of March 15, 2022 for reference purposes, and is made by and among the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”), the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”), and the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “Parking Authority”), to amend that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989 (the “JPA Agreement”).

RECITALS:

A. The Joint Exercise of Powers Act, being California Government Code Section 6500, et seq. (the “Joint Powers Act”), provides that public agencies by agreement may jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties. The Parking Authority is a “public agency” within the meaning of that term under Section 6502 of the Joint Powers Act, and as such, is eligible to enter into this Agreement.

B. Pursuant to Article 4 of the Joint Powers Act (also known as the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985), an authority created pursuant to Article 1 of the Joint Powers Act has additional, independent powers under the Joint Powers Act, including the power to issue bonds to pay the cost of any public capital improvement, and the power to make secured or unsecured loans to a local agency, including the City and the Parking Authority, in connection with the financing of public capital improvements and to refinance indebtedness incurred in connection with public capital improvements undertaken and completed, and may purchase bonds issued by any local agency at a public or private sale and such bonds may be held by the authority or sold to public or private purchasers at public or negotiated sales.

C. Pursuant to the Joint Powers Act, the City and the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Redevelopment Agency”) have heretofore entered into the JPA Agreement, pursuant to which the public entity known as the “South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority” was created.

D. On June 29, 2011, Assembly Bill No. 16 was enacted as Chapter 5 of Statutes of 2011 (“AB 26”), pursuant to which all redevelopment agencies in the State of California were statutorily dissolved as of February 1, 2012, including the Former Redevelopment Agency, and the Former Redevelopment Agency’s interests in and obligations under the JPA Agreement were assigned to the Successor Agency by operation of the law enacted by AB 26, including but not limited to California Health and Safety Code Section 34178(b)(3).

E. California Health and Safety Code Section 34187(b) provides for the dissolution of the Successor Agency within several months of the final retirement or payment of all enforceable 604
-2-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
obligations of the Former Redevelopment Agency, disposal of all real property, and resolution of all outstanding litigation of the Successor Agency.

F. There continues to be a need within the City, consistent with the need described in the declarations of the State Legislature set forth in Article 4 of the Joint Powers Act, to expand, upgrade, and otherwise improve the public capital facilities of local government necessary to support the rehabilitation and construction of residential and economic development. The needs of local government for financing these facilities greatly exceed the amount of funds available from existing state, local, and federal sources.

G. The needs of the City to expand, upgrade, and otherwise improve the public capital facilities are expected to continue beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, and bonded indebtedness or other obligations that may be issued with the assistance of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority are expected to have terms and maturities extending beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, so it is necessary to add the Parking Authority as a member of the JPA Agreement in order to continue the existence of the Authority.

H. The common powers of the City and the Parking Authority include the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, refinancing, or development of public parking facilities and for the provision of capital improvements in connection with and determined necessary to the public parking facilities; the power to purchase bonds, notes or other obligations; the power to acquire and dispose of real and personal property; the power to pay for the cost of publicly owned improvements in connection with and determined necessary to the public parking facilities; and the power to accept financial assistance from various public sources. The City and the Parking Authority desire to jointly exercise certain powers common to the parties, as set forth herein, including the foregoing and including the expansion, upgrading and improvement of said public capital improvements, and to facilitate the continued existence of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority, which may also exercise its independent powers authorized by the Joint Powers Act.

I. The Parking Authority desires to enter into this Amendment No. 1 to become a party to the JPA Agreement in furtherance of the Joint Powers Act, including Article 4 thereof, and the Successor Agency desires to withdraw from the JPA Agreement.

J. The inclusion of the Parking Authority as a member to the Authority will preserve the existence of the Authority (thereby avoiding any disruption with respect to the outstanding Authority bonds), while allowing the Successor Agency to withdraw its membership.

K. In furtherance of the purposes of the JPA Agreement and the Joint Powers Act, including Article 4 thereof, and pursuant to Section 16 of the JPA Agreement, the City and the Successor Agency desire to enter into this Amendment No. 1 to: (i) add the Parking Authority as a party to the JPA Agreement, (ii) provide for the withdrawal of the Successor Agency from the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and the JPA Agreement, and (iii) certain updates to the JPA Agreement, including clarifying changes necessitated by all of the foregoing. 605
-3-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
NOW, THEREFORE, the City, the Successor Agency, and the Parking Authority agree as follows:

Section 1. Amendments to the JPA Agreement.

A. The JPA Agreement is hereby amended to include the Parking Authority as a party to the JPA Agreement. By its signature to this Amendment No. 1, the Parking Authority agrees to be a party to the JPA Agreement and accepts the terms of the JPA Agreement.

B. The JPA Agreement is hereby amended to remove the Former Redevelopment Agency as succeeded by the Successor Agency, as assignee by operation of law to the Former Redevelopment Agency, as a member of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and as a party of the JPA Agreement and thus terminate its membership in the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority.

C. The recitals of the JPA Agreement are hereby amended to add the following recital:

WHEREAS, this Agreement has been amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989, to reflect the addition of the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe as a member of the Authority and as a party to this Agreement and to reflect the withdrawal of the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency, as successor to the Agency by operation of law upon the Agency’s statutory dissolution, from membership of the Authority and the JPA Agreement.”
D. Section 1 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended to add the following additional defined terms:
“Amendment No. 1” means that certain Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of January 3, 1989, by and among the City, the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency, as successor to the former Agency, and the Parking Authority. “Local Agency” means a Member, or an agency or subdivision of that Member, sponsoring a project of Public Capital Improvements, or any city, county, city and county, authority, district, or public corporation of the State of California. “Member” means originally, the City and the Agency, and any other member who may be become a member of the Authority, including but not limited to the Parking Authority, which was added as a member pursuant to Amendment No. 1.
“Parking Authority” means the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe, a public body, corporate and politic, duly organized and validly existing pursuant to the Constitution of the State of California and the Parking Law of 1949. 606
-4-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
“Parking Law of 1949” means the Parking Law of 1949, being California Streets and Highways Code Section 32500, et seq., as amended from time to time. “Public Capital Improvements” has the meaning given to such term in Section 6585 of the Law, as in effect on the date hereof, and as hereafter amended.

E. Section 2 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:
“Section 2. PURPOSE
This Agreement is made for the joint exercise of powers common to its Members, and for other purposes as permitted under the Law. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the financing of Public Capital Improvements, and working capital requirements of a Local Agency through the acquisition by the Authority of such Public Capital Improvements and the leasing, purchasing or selling thereof to a Local Agency and/or the purchase by the Authority of Obligations of a Local Agency pursuant to bond purchase agreements and/or the lending of funds by the Authority to a Local Agency.”
F. Section 3 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“SECTION 3. TERM
This Agreement shall become effective as of the date hereof and shall continue in full force and effect until terminated by the parties hereto pursuant to a supplemental agreement executed by the Members; provided, however, that in no event shall this Agreement terminate while any notes or bonds of the Authority remain outstanding, or while the Authority owns or holds any interest in a Public Capital Improvement.”
G. Subsection C.(1) of Section 4 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“C. Meetings of the Board
(1) Regular Meetings. “Regular meetings of the Board shall be held on the same day and at the same time and place as the regular meetings of the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe, so long as an agenda for such meeting is posted at least 72 hours in advance of such meeting (or such other length of period as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act). If the Board of Directors has no business to conduct on a date when a Regular Meeting would otherwise be held, no agenda for the Board of Directors meeting shall be posted and such Regular Meeting shall be automatically cancelled.”
607
-5-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
H. Except for the Recitals of the JPA Agreement and the defined terms of the JPA Agreement amended or added by Section 1.D. of this Amendment No. 1, which shall read as set forth in such Section 1.D., and except as otherwise amended by the foregoing provisions of this Section 1, all references in the JPA Agreement to the “Agency” are hereby amended and restated to refer to the “Parking Authority.”
Section 2. JPA Agreement to Remain in Effect. Save and except as expressly amended by this Amendment No. 1, the JPA Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 3. Filing with Secretary of State and State Controller. The Executive Director of the Authority shall cause to be filed, or shall confirm the filing of: (1) a notice of this Amendment No. 1 with the office of the Secretary of State within 30 days of its effective date, as required by Section 6503.5 of the Joint Powers Act, and (ii) a copy of this Amendment No. 1 together with the JPA Agreement with the Controller and the local agency formation commission in the County of El Dorado as required by Section 6503.6 of the Joint Powers Act.

Section 4. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in counterparts, and photocopies or facsimile copies of this Amendment No. 1 may be used as originals.

Section 5. Effective Date. The effective date of this Amendment No. 1 shall be the date upon which the resolution of the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency approving this Amendment No. 1 is effective pursuant to Sections 34179(h) and 34181(f) of the California Health and Safety Code.
[signatures on next page]
608
-6-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
ATTEST:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SOUTH TAHOE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Devin Middlebrook, Chair
ATTEST:

Susan Blankenship, Secretary

PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE
TAHOE
Cristi Creegan, Chair
ATTEST:

Suisan Blankenship, Secretary
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Agenda Item #: 19
Agenda Item: Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority
Executive Summary: Approval of the attached resolution and Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement would allow the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe to become a member of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency to withdraw from the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Acting as the Board of Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe, Pass a Resolution Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority to replace Successor Agency with Parking Authority.

Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Chief Administrative Officer Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Chief Administrative Officer Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - PACSLT Joint Powers Agreement.docx
02-PACSLT Resolution Amendment to Joint Powers.docx
03-PACSLT Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement (Exh. A to Reso).docx 04-JPA Agreement - SLT.pdf
627
Staff Report – March 15, 2022
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to Parking Authority
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Title: Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority.

Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Chief Administrative Officer (530) 542-6043 Background:

Pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, Government Code Section 6500, et seq. (the “Joint Powers Act”), the City and the Redevelopment Agency in 1989 created the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority (the “Financing Authority”), by entering into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the “JPA Agreement”). Under the Joint Powers Act, the Financing Authority has all of the powers common to its members, as well as additional, independent powers under the Joint Powers Act. The Joint Powers Act authorizes the Financing Authority to assist public agencies, such as the City and its related entities, in the financing and refinancing of public capital improvements.

In the past, the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority has assisted the City in the issuance of 2016 Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, as well as 2012 Certificates of Participation, the proceeds of which were used to finance streets and other capital improvements within the City. It is expected that in the future, the assistance of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority will again be needed to assist the City in securing financing for the construction of new projects, including the new recreation center.

Issue and Discussion:

The former Redevelopment Agency’s interest in the JPA Agreement was assigned to the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency by operation of AB X1 26, which enacted the Dissolution Act. The Dissolution Act, as amended by AB 1484, enacted by the State Legislature on June 27, 2012, and as amended further by SB 107, enacted by the State Legislature on September 22, 2015, introduces complications to certain bond financing assisted by the Financing Authority. California Health and Safety Code Section 34187 specifies that the Successor Agency’s existence will terminate within a few months after the final payment of debt of the former Redevelopment Agency (or the disposal of all real property and resolution of all outstanding litigation). The last debt of the Redevelopment Agency matures in 2037, and assuming that all real property has been disposed of and that there is no litigation at the time, the Successor Agency’s existence will terminate within approximately 15 years from now. 628
Staff Report March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 1
To finance or refinance public capital improvements of the City and its related entities, it is expected that additional bonded indebtedness or obligations will be issued with the assistance of the Financing Authority, and having terms and maturities extending beyond termination of the Successor Agency. Amendment of the JPA Agreement to add another member is necessary in order to preserve the continued existence of the Financing Authority after the termination of the Successor Agency’s existence. The 2012 Certificates of Participation have a term of longer than 15 years, and the financing for the recreation center Project will have a term of longer than 15 years. Therefore, it is necessary to add the Parking Authority as a member to the Financing Authority to assure the financial feasibility of these important projects proposed to be financed by bonds, as well as other future capital improvement projects of the City.

The attached Amendment No. 1 to the JPA Agreement would add the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe as a member of the Financing Authority and withdraw and terminate the Successor Agency as a member of the Financing Authority. Amendment No. 1 would facilitate the continued existence of the Financing Authority beyond the termination of the Successor Agency. In addition, the Successor Agency would no longer be subject to provisions of the JPA Agreement that could require the Successor Agency to contribute funds in the future. To date, no financial contributions have been required from the former Redevelopment Agency or the Successor Agency under such provisions.

Financial Implications:

By withdrawal of the Successor Agency from the Financing Authority, the Successor Agency will no longer be subject to potential financial contribution requirements under the JPA Agreement. By addition of the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe to the JPA Agreement, the Financing Authority will continue in existence beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, thereby allowing the Financing Authority to continue to assist the City and its related entities in bond financings for significant public benefits, including (a) demonstrable savings in effective interest rate or bond issuance costs, (b) significant reductions in effective user charges levied, (c) employment benefits from undertaking the project in a timely fashion, or (d) more efficient delivery of local agency services to residential and commercial development.

Environmental Considerations:

None.

Policy Implications:

None.
629
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
Parking Authority
March 15, 2022
Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority

BACKGROUND
A. The City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”) and the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Agency”) entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989 (the “Original Agreement”), establishing the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority (the “PFA”) as a joint powers agency pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act (Government Code Sections 6500 et seq.) (the “Act”).

B. The Original Agreement was made pursuant to the Act, to provide for the joint exercise of powers common to the members of the PFA, and the establishment of a vehicle to reduce local borrowing costs and promote the greater use of existing and new financial instruments and mechanisms, and undertake the financing of public capital improvements and related capital improvements and the acquisition of real and personal property for the members of the PFA and other public agencies within the State.

C. Pursuant to Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code (enacted by Chapter 5 of the Statutes of 2011, ABX1 26), all redevelopment agencies in the State of California, including the Former Agency, dissolved as of February 1, 2012, the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”) was established as the successor entity to the Former Agency, and the Oversight Board to the Successor Agency (the “Oversight Board”) was constituted.

D. The Successor Agency is tasked with the wind-down of the Former Agency’s affairs.

E. There has been prepared an Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the “Amendment”), by and among the City, the Successor Agency and the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “Parking Authority”), pursuant to which: (i) the Successor Agency will withdraw as a member of the PFA and the Parking Authority will become a new member of the PFA, and (ii) certain provisions of the Original Agreement will be updated.

F. The Successor Agency’s withdrawal as a member of the PFA is in furtherance of the wind-down of the Former Agency’s affairs.
630
Resolution 2022-XXX March 15, 2022 Page 2 of 2
G. The PFA has previously issued bonds, some of which remain outstanding as of the date hereof.

H. The inclusion of the Parking Authority as a member to the PFA will preserve the existence of the PFA (thereby avoiding any disruption with respect to the outstanding PFA bonds), while allowing the Successor Agency to withdraw its membership.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Approves the form of Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the “Amendment No. 1”), dated as of March 15, 2022 and attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” by and among the City, the Successor Agency, and the Parking Authority, and authorizes and directs the Chair of the Parking Authority, for and on behalf of the Parking Authority, to execute and deliver the Amendment No. 1 in substantially the form on file with the Secretary of the Parking Authority and presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the Chair of the Parking Authority may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by her execution and delivery thereof; provided however, that such execution and delivery shall occur after the effectiveness (pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179(h)) of the Oversight Board’s resolution approving the execution and delivery of the Amendment No. 1.

2. Directs that his Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

Adopted by the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe on March 15, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cristi Creegan, Chair
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, Secretary
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
631
-1-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
with respect to the

SOUTH TAHOE JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
This Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (this “Amendment No. 1”) is dated as of March 15, 2022 for reference purposes, and is made by and among the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”), the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”), and the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “Parking Authority”), to amend that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989 (the “JPA Agreement”).

RECITALS:

A. The Joint Exercise of Powers Act, being California Government Code Section 6500, et seq. (the “Joint Powers Act”), provides that public agencies by agreement may jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties. The Parking Authority is a “public agency” within the meaning of that term under Section 6502 of the Joint Powers Act, and as such, is eligible to enter into this Agreement.

B. Pursuant to Article 4 of the Joint Powers Act (also known as the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985), an authority created pursuant to Article 1 of the Joint Powers Act has additional, independent powers under the Joint Powers Act, including the power to issue bonds to pay the cost of any public capital improvement, and the power to make secured or unsecured loans to a local agency, including the City and the Parking Authority, in connection with the financing of public capital improvements and to refinance indebtedness incurred in connection with public capital improvements undertaken and completed, and may purchase bonds issued by any local agency at a public or private sale and such bonds may be held by the authority or sold to public or private purchasers at public or negotiated sales.

C. Pursuant to the Joint Powers Act, the City and the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency (the “Former Redevelopment Agency”) have heretofore entered into the JPA Agreement, pursuant to which the public entity known as the “South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority” was created.

D. On June 29, 2011, Assembly Bill No. 16 was enacted as Chapter 5 of Statutes of 2011 (“AB 26”), pursuant to which all redevelopment agencies in the State of California were statutorily dissolved as of February 1, 2012, including the Former Redevelopment Agency, and the Former Redevelopment Agency’s interests in and obligations under the JPA Agreement were assigned to the Successor Agency by operation of the law enacted by AB 26, including but not limited to California Health and Safety Code Section 34178(b)(3).

E. California Health and Safety Code Section 34187(b) provides for the dissolution of the Successor Agency within several months of the final retirement or payment of all enforceable 632
-2-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
obligations of the Former Redevelopment Agency, disposal of all real property, and resolution of all outstanding litigation of the Successor Agency.

F. There continues to be a need within the City, consistent with the need described in the declarations of the State Legislature set forth in Article 4 of the Joint Powers Act, to expand, upgrade, and otherwise improve the public capital facilities of local government necessary to support the rehabilitation and construction of residential and economic development. The needs of local government for financing these facilities greatly exceed the amount of funds available from existing state, local, and federal sources.

G. The needs of the City to expand, upgrade, and otherwise improve the public capital facilities are expected to continue beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, and bonded indebtedness or other obligations that may be issued with the assistance of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority are expected to have terms and maturities extending beyond the termination of the Successor Agency, so it is necessary to add the Parking Authority as a member of the JPA Agreement in order to continue the existence of the Authority.

H. The common powers of the City and the Parking Authority include the power to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of financing the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, refinancing, or development of public parking facilities and for the provision of capital improvements in connection with and determined necessary to the public parking facilities; the power to purchase bonds, notes or other obligations; the power to acquire and dispose of real and personal property; the power to pay for the cost of publicly owned improvements in connection with and determined necessary to the public parking facilities; and the power to accept financial assistance from various public sources. The City and the Parking Authority desire to jointly exercise certain powers common to the parties, as set forth herein, including the foregoing and including the expansion, upgrading and improvement of said public capital improvements, and to facilitate the continued existence of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority, which may also exercise its independent powers authorized by the Joint Powers Act.

I. The Parking Authority desires to enter into this Amendment No. 1 to become a party to the JPA Agreement in furtherance of the Joint Powers Act, including Article 4 thereof, and the Successor Agency desires to withdraw from the JPA Agreement.

J. The inclusion of the Parking Authority as a member to the Authority will preserve the existence of the Authority (thereby avoiding any disruption with respect to the outstanding Authority bonds), while allowing the Successor Agency to withdraw its membership.

K. In furtherance of the purposes of the JPA Agreement and the Joint Powers Act, including Article 4 thereof, and pursuant to Section 16 of the JPA Agreement, the City and the Successor Agency desire to enter into this Amendment No. 1 to: (i) add the Parking Authority as a party to the JPA Agreement, (ii) provide for the withdrawal of the Successor Agency from the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and the JPA Agreement, and (iii) certain updates to the JPA Agreement, including clarifying changes necessitated by all of the foregoing. 633
-3-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
NOW, THEREFORE, the City, the Successor Agency, and the Parking Authority agree as follows:

Section 1. Amendments to the JPA Agreement.

A. The JPA Agreement is hereby amended to include the Parking Authority as a party to the JPA Agreement. By its signature to this Amendment No. 1, the Parking Authority agrees to be a party to the JPA Agreement and accepts the terms of the JPA Agreement.

B. The JPA Agreement is hereby amended to remove the Former Redevelopment Agency as succeeded by the Successor Agency, as assignee by operation of law to the Former Redevelopment Agency, as a member of the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority and as a party of the JPA Agreement and thus terminate its membership in the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority.

C. The recitals of the JPA Agreement are hereby amended to add the following recital:

WHEREAS, this Agreement has been amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated January 3, 1989, to reflect the addition of the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe as a member of the Authority and as a party to this Agreement and to reflect the withdrawal of the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency, as successor to the Agency by operation of law upon the Agency’s statutory dissolution, from membership of the Authority and the JPA Agreement.”
D. Section 1 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended to add the following additional defined terms:
“Amendment No. 1” means that certain Amendment No. 1 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of January 3, 1989, by and among the City, the Successor Agency to the South Tahoe Redevelopment Agency, as successor to the former Agency, and the Parking Authority. “Local Agency” means a Member, or an agency or subdivision of that Member, sponsoring a project of Public Capital Improvements, or any city, county, city and county, authority, district, or public corporation of the State of California. “Member” means originally, the City and the Agency, and any other member who may be become a member of the Authority, including but not limited to the Parking Authority, which was added as a member pursuant to Amendment No. 1.
“Parking Authority” means the Parking Authority of the City of South Tahoe, a public body, corporate and politic, duly organized and validly existing pursuant to the Constitution of the State of California and the Parking Law of 1949. 634
-4-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
“Parking Law of 1949” means the Parking Law of 1949, being California Streets and Highways Code Section 32500, et seq., as amended from time to time. “Public Capital Improvements” has the meaning given to such term in Section 6585 of the Law, as in effect on the date hereof, and as hereafter amended.

E. Section 2 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:
“Section 2. PURPOSE
This Agreement is made for the joint exercise of powers common to its Members, and for other purposes as permitted under the Law. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the financing of Public Capital Improvements, and working capital requirements of a Local Agency through the acquisition by the Authority of such Public Capital Improvements and the leasing, purchasing or selling thereof to a Local Agency and/or the purchase by the Authority of Obligations of a Local Agency pursuant to bond purchase agreements and/or the lending of funds by the Authority to a Local Agency.”
F. Section 3 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“SECTION 3. TERM
This Agreement shall become effective as of the date hereof and shall continue in full force and effect until terminated by the parties hereto pursuant to a supplemental agreement executed by the Members; provided, however, that in no event shall this Agreement terminate while any notes or bonds of the Authority remain outstanding, or while the Authority owns or holds any interest in a Public Capital Improvement.”
G. Subsection C.(1) of Section 4 of the JPA Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“C. Meetings of the Board
(1) Regular Meetings. “Regular meetings of the Board shall be held on the same day and at the same time and place as the regular meetings of the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe, so long as an agenda for such meeting is posted at least 72 hours in advance of such meeting (or such other length of period as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act). If the Board of Directors has no business to conduct on a date when a Regular Meeting would otherwise be held, no agenda for the Board of Directors meeting shall be posted and such Regular Meeting shall be automatically cancelled.”
635
-5-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
H. Except for the Recitals of the JPA Agreement and the defined terms of the JPA Agreement amended or added by Section 1.D. of this Amendment No. 1, which shall read as set forth in such Section 1.D., and except as otherwise amended by the foregoing provisions of this Section 1, all references in the JPA Agreement to the “Agency” are hereby amended and restated to refer to the “Parking Authority.”
Section 2. JPA Agreement to Remain in Effect. Save and except as expressly amended by this Amendment No. 1, the JPA Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 3. Filing with Secretary of State and State Controller. The Executive Director of the Authority shall cause to be filed, or shall confirm the filing of: (1) a notice of this Amendment No. 1 with the office of the Secretary of State within 30 days of its effective date, as required by Section 6503.5 of the Joint Powers Act, and (ii) a copy of this Amendment No. 1 together with the JPA Agreement with the Controller and the local agency formation commission in the County of El Dorado as required by Section 6503.6 of the Joint Powers Act.

Section 4. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in counterparts, and photocopies or facsimile copies of this Amendment No. 1 may be used as originals.

Section 5. Effective Date. The effective date of this Amendment No. 1 shall be the date upon which the resolution of the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency approving this Amendment No. 1 is effective pursuant to Sections 34179(h) and 34181(f) of the California Health and Safety Code.
[signatures on next page]
636
-6-
12463-0017\2622699v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
ATTEST:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE SOUTH TAHOE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Devin Middlebrook, Chair
ATTEST:

Susan Blankenship, Secretary

PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE
TAHOE
Cristi Creegan, Chair
ATTEST:

Suisan Blankenship, Secretary
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Agenda Item #: 20
Agenda Item: Adoption of Bylaws of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe Executive Summary: On March 1, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-025, which activated and established the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe (“Parking Authority”) as provided by the Parking Law of 1949 (Part 2 of Division 18 (commencing with Section 32500) of the California Streets and Highways Code). Pursuant to Section 32661.1 of the Parking Law of 1949 and Resolution No. 2022-025, the City Council declared itself to be the Board of Directors Parking Authority.

At this first meeting of the Parking Authority, there is a need to adopt bylaws for the Parking Authority.

The Bylaws establish the posts for the key officers of the Parking Authority. The Bylaws also establish that the regular meeting dates of the Parking Authority Board shall coincide with the regular meeting dates of the City Council, but provides that any such meeting will be automatically cancelled without any further action of the Board or any officer of the Parking Authority if no agenda is posted.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution adopting the official Bylaws of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe.

Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Chief Administrative Officer Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Chief Administrative Officer Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Parking Authority Bylaws.docx
02-Parking Authority Resolution - Parking Authority Bylaws.docx 03- Reso. No. 2022-025 Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe.pdf 655
Staff Report – March 15, 2022
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to Parking Authority
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Title: Adoption of Bylaws of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, Chief Administrative Officer (530) 542-6043 Background:

On March 1, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-025, which activated and established the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe (“Parking Authority”) as provided by the Parking Law of 1949 (Part 2 of Division 18 (commencing with Section 32500) of the California Streets and Highways Code). Pursuant to Section 32661.1 of the Parking Law of 1949 and Resolution No. 2022-025, the City Council declared itself to be the Board of Directors Parking Authority.

Issue and Discussion:

At this first meeting of the Parking Authority, there is a need to adopt bylaws for the Parking Authority. The Bylaws establish the posts for the key officers of the Parking Authority. The Bylaws also establish that the regular meeting dates of the Parking Authority Board shall coincide with the regular meeting dates of the City Council but provides that any such meeting will be automatically cancelled without any further action of the Board or any officer of the Parking Authority if no agenda is posted.

Financial Implications:

There is no financial impact related to this item.

Environmental Considerations:

None.

Policy Implications:

None.
656
-1-
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
Parking Authority
March 15, 2022
Approving Bylaws of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe

BACKGROUND
A. The City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”) has heretofore approved a resolution determining that there is a need for the parking authority described in, and governed by, Part 2 of Division 18 (commencing with Section 32500) of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Parking Law of 1949”) to function in the City, thereby authorizing the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe to transact business and exercise any powers under the Parking Law of 1949.

B. The Parking Authority desires to adopt Bylaws.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. The Bylaws of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe, attached hereto as Exhibit A, are hereby approved and adopted as the official Bylaws of the Parking Authority.

Adopted by the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on March 15, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cristi Creegan, Chair
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, Secretary
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
657
-2-

EXHIBIT A
BYLAWS
OF THE

PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

ARTICLE I - THE PARKING AUTHORITY
Section 1. Name of Parking Authority. The name of the Parking Authority shall be the “Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe.” Section 2. Seal of Authority. The Parking Authority may have a seal. The seal of the Parking Authority shall be in the form of a circle and shall bear the name of the Parking Authority and the year of its organization.

Section 3. Office of Authority. The office of the Parking Authority shall be at the offices of the City of South Lake Tahoe, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 210, South Lake Tahoe, California 96150.

Section 4. Governing Body. The members of the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe shall constitute the governing body of the Parking Authority, which governing body shall be known as the Board of Directors.

ARTICLE II - OFFICERS
Section 1. Officers. The officers of the Parking Authority shall be a Chair, a Vice-Chair, a Secretary, a Treasurer and a Chief Administrative Officer. An officer shall sign all contracts, deeds and other instruments made by the Parking Authority.

Section 2. Chair. The Chair shall be the member of the Board of Directors who is the then current Mayor Pro Tem of the City of South Lake Tahoe. The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Parking Authority.

Section 3. Vice-Chair. The Vice-Chair shall be the member of the Board of Directors who is the then current Mayor of the City of South Lake Tahoe. The Vice-Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in the absence or incapacity of the Chair.

Section 4. Secretary. The Secretary shall be the then current City Clerk of the City of South Lake Tahoe. The Secretary shall keep the records of the Parking Authority, shall act as Secretary of the meetings of the Board of Directors and record all votes, and shall keep a record of the proceedings of the Parking Authority in the form of minutes to be kept for such purpose, and shall perform all duties incident to the office of Secretary.

The Secretary shall keep in safe custody the seal of the Parking Authority and shall have power to affix such seal as necessary and to the extent required to contracts and instruments authorized by the Board of Directors to be executed. The Secretary may attest to signatures of other officers of the Parking Authority. 658
-3-
Section 5. Treasurer. The Treasurer shall be the then current City Treasurer of the City of South Lake Tahoe. The Treasurer shall keep regular books of accounts showing receipts and expenditures and shall render to the Board of Directors, at least once annually and as additionally requested by the Board of Directors, an account of the transactions of the Parking Authority and shall perform any other duties that are designated from time to time by the Parking Authority. The Treasurer, or in the absence of the Treasurer, a person appointed by the Treasurer or the Board of Directors, shall have the care and custody of all funds of the Parking Authority. The Treasurer may enter into agreements on behalf of the Parking Authority with any financial institution authorized to accept deposits of public funds, providing for the transfer of funds between accounts maintained therein by the Parking Authority upon request by telephone. Such agreements may also provide for the investment upon request by telephone of funds maintained in such accounts, in property or securities in which public agencies may legally invest money subject to their control. Such agreements shall designate the accounts maintained by the Parking Authority which are subject thereto, and the persons who may, from time to time, make such transfers and direct such investments by telephone request.

Section 6. Chief Administrative Officer. The Chief Administrative Officer shall be the then current City Manager of the City of South Lake Tahoe. The Chief Administrative Officer shall conduct day-to-day administration of the Parking Authority's business and affairs, subject to the direction of the Board of Directors.

Section 7. Additional Duties. The officers of the Parking Authority shall perform such other duties and functions as may from time to time be required by the Parking Authority or these By-Laws or by resolution, rules and regulations or by motion of the Board of Directors. All orders and checks for the payment of money, notes or other evidences of indebtedness under the direction of, issued in the name of, or payable to the Parking Authority shall be signed by or endorsed by the Treasurer, unless otherwise provided by law (including, but not limited to, California Health and Safety Code Section 33135) or pursuant to an agreement approved by the Board of Directors by resolution.

Section 8. Assistants and Deputies; Additional Personnel. (a) Whenever an officer of the Parking Authority or the City is designated an officer of the Parking Authority, the assistants and deputies of such officer from time to time shall also be, ex officio, officers of the Parking Authority; and whenever a power is granted to, or a duty imposed upon, such officer, the power may be exercised, or the duty performed, by such assistant or deputy. The Board of Directors may from time to time employ such other personnel as it deems necessary to exercise its powers, duties and functions. The selection and compensation of such officers and other personnel shall be determined by the Board of Directors.
(b) Pursuant to the authority granted by Sections 32811 and 32812 of the California Health and Safety Code and to avoid the unnecessary duplication of effort or expense, all of the remaining departments and officers of the City shall furnish to the Parking Authority, upon the request of the Chief Administrative Officer and with the general consent of the Board of Directors and the City Council, services and the use of 659
-4-
City department facilities in connection with matters within the scope of the normal activities of the particular department. The furnishing of such services and the use of such department facilities shall be subject to reimbursement by the Parking Authority to the City, to the extent approved by the Board of Directors and the City Council, for not more than the reasonable value thereof.

ARTICLE III - MEETINGS
Section 1. Regular Meetings. A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Parking Authority shall be held at the time and place of each regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe. In the event an agenda for a regular meeting of the Parking Authority is not posted timely in accordance with the provisions of Section 54954.2 of the California Government Code, such regular meeting is cancelled without any further action of the Board of Directors or any officer of the Parking Authority.

Section 2. Applicability of Ralph M. Brown Act. Meetings of the Parking Authority shall be held, notice given and the business of the Parking Authority conducted, all as provided in the Ralph M. Brown Act, being California Government Code Section 54950, et seq.

Section 3. Quorum. Three members of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time until a quorum is obtained. Action may be taken by the Board of Directors upon a vote of a majority of a quorum, unless a higher vote is required by law.

Section 4. Manner of Voting. The manner of voting on resolutions and on other matters shall be as prescribed by the Chair.

ARTICLE IV - REPORTS
Section 1. Financial Reports.
(a) In furtherance of Section 5 of Article II herein and Section 32663 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the Treasurer shall render to the Board of Directors, at least once annually and as additionally requested by the Board of Directors, a detailed report of all of the transactions of the Parking Authority, including a statement of all revenues and expenditures.
(b) In furtherance of Section 32664 of the California Streets and Highways Code, at least once annually, the Parking Authority shall submit a statement of all its financial affairs, audited by independent certified public accountants, to the City Council of the City.

ARTICLE V - AMENDMENTS
Section 1.Amendments to Bylaws. The Bylaws of the Parking Authority may be amended by resolution of the Parking Authority.
660
Resolution 2022-025 March 1, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-025
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
March 1, 2022
Declaring a Need for a Parking Authority to Function in the City and Declaring the City Council to be the Board of Directors of the Parking Authority

BACKGROUND
A. Part 2 of Division 18 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 32500, ( the “Parking Law of 1949”) provides that in each city exists a public body, corporate and politic, known as the parking authority of such city.

B. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 32651, the parking authority within the City of South Lake Tahoe ( the “ City”) may transact business and exercise any powers granted to a parking authority pursuant to the Parking Law of 1949 upon a declaration by resolution of the City Council of the City ( the “ City Council”) that there is a need for the parking authority to function in the City.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe hereby finds, determines, resolves and orders as follows:

Section 1. The City Council hereby declares that there is a need for the parking authority described in, and governed by, the Parking Law of 1949 to function in the City.

Section 2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 32650, the name of the parking authority shall be the “ Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe” which is and shall be a public body, corporate and politic.

Section 3. The City Council hereby declares itself to be the Board of Directors of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe pursuant to the authority granted by Streets and Highways Code Section 32661. 1. Accordingly, all the rights, powers, duties, privileges, and immunities created by the Parking Law of 1949 shall be vested in the City Council as the Board of Directors of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall cause to be filed with the California Secretary of State and with the County Clerk of the County of El Dorado the information required by Section 53051 of the Government Code of the State of California.

Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. 661
Resolution 2022-025 March 1, 2022 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on March 1, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes: Bass, Creegan, Friedrich and Middlebrook

Absent: Wallace
Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.

Devin Middlebrook ( Mar 1, 2022 15: 50 PST)
Mar 1, 2022
662
Res 2022-025 Parking Authority of the City of
South Lake Tahoe
Final Audit Report 2022- 03-01
Created: 2022- 03-01
By: jo Mcdonough ( jmcdonough@cityofslt. us)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAqdCxQ0C0Ux8WAN5CRDJJYDukmf- vhIBo Res 2022-025 Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Taho e" History
Document created by jo Mcdonough ([email protected]) 2022- 03- 01 - 11:32:25 PM GMT- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document emailed to Sue Blankenship ([email protected]) for signature 2022- 03- 01 - 11:33:42 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Sue Blankenship ( sblankenship@cityofslt. us) Signature Date: 2022- 03-01 - 11:45:16 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 128. 92.136. 146 Document emailed to Devin Middlebrook ([email protected]) for signature 2022- 03- 01 - 11:45:18 PM GMT
Email viewed by Devin Middlebrook ([email protected]) 2022- 03- 01 - 11:50:19 PM GMT- IP address: 66.189. 255. 213 Document e-signed by Devin Middlebrook ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2022- 03-01 - 11:50:31 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 66.189. 255. 213 Agreement completed.
2022- 03- 01 - 11:50:31 PM GMT
663
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: March 15, 2022
Agenda Item #: 21
Agenda Item: Agenda Planning Calendar
Executive Summary:

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: A Councilmember may request that an item be placed on a future agenda. Upon the support of one (1) additional Council Member, direction shall be given to the City Manager to calendar the item for a convenient future agenda, but no sooner than the second meeting after the request was made, and/or modify the Agenda Planning Calendar as desired.

Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, City Manager
Responsible Staff Member:

Reviewed and Approved By:

Attachments:

APC - March 10, 2022.pdf
664
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 3/10/2022
Department Agenda Item Agenda Section
Mar. 29, 9 a.m. Strategic Planning Advance
April 5, 9 a.m. City Clerk Minutes Consent
Proclamation - Child Abuse Prevention Month Procs
City Employee Recognitions Emp Rec.

City Attny Cannabis Ordinance Amendments (Second Reading) Copnsent City Manager Ordinance -Amendments to Trash Enforcement NB Finance Ski Run BID Levy of Assessment for Business License Year 2022/2023 PH Dev Serv ABC - Public Convenience and Necessity - Grocery Outlet PH PSA Consulting Services Developing Local Green Building Standard Ord “Reach NB TEFRA Hearing - Sugar Pine Village PH
3708 Lake Tahoe Blvd & 3709 Osgood Avenue Town Homes Tentative Map, File NB Public Works Annual Report NB
Appropriate Budget & Award Contract for LED Light Retrofit (US Hwy 50) UB Purchase Agreement Property Acquisition Tahoe Valley Stormwater and GreenbeConsent Award Contract for Bellamy Parking Garage Access Upgrades and Revenue ConNB License Agreement CTC Greenbelt Improvement Project Consent 665
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 3/10/2022
Grant - SNPLMA Upper Bijo Park Creek Consent
May 3, 9 a.m. City Attny Agreement for Wellness/Injury Prevention Services NB Dev Serv Local Housing Revenue feasibility study PSA NB TRPA Development Commodity Distribution Policies NB
PLHA Moderate Income Homebuyer Administration PSA Consent Finance City Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) FY ended 09/30/2021 Consent Authorizing Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Consent Pub Works EIP and Regional Project Priority Presentation NB Annual Parcel Tax for County Serice Area #3 PH
May 17, 5:30 p.m City Manager Award RFP Video Production Services NB Pub. Works Award FY 2023 Airport Master Plan RFQ
PSA Dennis Machida Bike Trail
NB
June 7, 5:30 p.m.City Clerk Proclamation Pride Month
City Manager SW Gas Prestentation Renewable Energy Goals Pub Works Rec Center Presentation & Award Phase 1 Contract Hazardous Materials Remediation Campground Store and Outbuildings June 21, 5:30 p.mCity Attorney Cannabis Tax Measure Ballot Measure 666
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 3/10/2022
Dev Services Housing Element Adoption
City Clerk Resolution Calling for Consolidated Election/Ballot Measures/Offices Pub Works CIP Presentation - Policy Rankings
Aug. 9, 9 a.m. City Manager ARPA Project Round 2 Discussion Finance Approval of Bond Financing Docs for the Rec Center Construction Financing NB Dev Services "Lease to Locals" Program Incentive
Pub Works Rec Center Bonds - Position of Statement
Aug. 23, 9 a.m. Budget Workshop
Pub Works Formal CIP Presentation for Adoption?
Sept. 6, 9 a.m.

Sept. 20, 5:30 p.mPub Works Rec Center Award - Phase II Oct. 4, 9 a.m.

Nov. 1, 9 a.m.

Nov. 15, 5:30 p.m.

Dec.13, 9 a.m. City Clerk Resolution Certification of Election Results City Council Re-Organization
Oath of Office
667
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 3/10/2022
2023 Meeting Schedule
City Council Assignments to Boards and Commissions Discussion League - New Mayors and Council Members Attendance
City Employee Recognitions
City Attorney Parking Garage License Agreement with Verizon Clean Indoor Air Ordinance Amendments (First Reading)
City Attny/PW Undergrounding Utilities
Amendments to Small Cell Policy
Liberty Utilities Franchise Agreement
City Clerk Records Management Policy (Updated)
Policy - Use of Personal Devices for City Business
City Manager Economic Development Strategy
Juvenile Treatment Center Discussion
Potential new City slogan
Customer satisfaction survey(s)
Dev Services Inclusionary housing ordinance
Unscheduled/Pending
668
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 3/10/2022
Plan Area Statement Update for Tourist Accommodation Uses Tourist Core Area Plan Amendment: 3828 Montreal Rd
RFP for consulting firms for Bijou / Al Tahoe Area Plan and Bijou Parks Master Plan Plan Area Statement 111 amendment
Single Room Occupancy Program Amendments
Outside Eating Code Review (coverage, seating, parking etc) Fire
Parks & Rec Memorandum of Understanding with Al Tahoe Pioneer Cemetery Support Committee Parks and Recreation – Bijou Golf Course Parking Lot Agreement Public Works Award Engineering and Construction Contract South Hangar Taxi Lane Rehab Award Contract PD - Community Recource Center Renovations SEED Solar Photovoltaic Project PPA
Award - James and Eloise Drainage Improvement Project Phase 1 Airport Deferred Maintenance Plan
Award 5-Year Lease/Concession for Airport Suite # 105
Recreation Bijou Park Master Plan
Bijou Golf Course "Rock the Lake" Event and Review
669
2022 Agenda Planning Calendar Updated 3/10/2022
670