Element, 7th cycle RHNA credit may only be taken for units approved (entitled or permitted) or built since December 31, 2026, the start date of the RHNA projection period.
Additional housing element and RHNA information is available on HCD’s webpage at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-community-development/housingelements/building-blocks.
Please contact Thomas Nguyen, Senior Data Specialist, at [email protected], if you have questions about the attached RHNA.
Sincerely,
Marisa Prasse
Fair Housing Section Chief
539
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 5, 2026
Agenda Item #:18
Agenda Item: Resolution in Support of Measure G to Renew Funding for Recreation Facilities Maintenance
Executive Summary: June 2, 2026 ballot Measure G would extend a special parcel tax, which funds maintenance of recreation facilities, for an additional 30 years, beginning July 1, 2030, and allow it to be increased by 2 percent annually. The City Council will consider a resolution in support of Measure G.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution in Support of Measure G to Renew Funding for Recreation Facilities Maintenance.
Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Resolution Supporting Measure G
02-Resolution - Supporting Measure G
540
Council Agenda Report- May 5, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 5, 2026
Title: Resolution in Support of Measure G to Renew Funding for Recreation Facilities Maintenance
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager Background: On July 11, 2000, the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority (JPA), was created, and consists of the City of South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado County, and Tahoe Paradise Resort Improvement District. In 2000, the voters passed a special parcel tax known as Measure S for Community Facilities District No. 2000-1 of the JPA, with the purpose of providing a funding source for recreation facilities and maintenance thereof within the boundaries of the JPA, including within city limits. Measure S had a term of 30 years and expires in 2030.
Under Measure S, owners of residential parcels currently pay $18 per year. Measure S currently brings in approximately $650,000 per year to fund recreation facility maintenance within the boundaries of the JPA. There is currently no identified alternative funding source for recreation facility maintenance.
The JPA Board passed Resolution No. 2025-01 to place a measure on the ballot for June 2, 2026, which has been labeled as Measure G. Measure G would extend the special tax for an additional 30 years, beginning July 1, 2030, and allow it to be increased by 2 percent annually.
At the meeting on March 24, 2026, City Council passed a motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute the Third Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement creating the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority with El Dorado County and Tahoe Paradise Recreation Park District, to execute the Third Amendment to the Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and to bring back a future agenda item to support Measure G.
Issue and Discussion: The ballot question for Measure G is worded as follows:
“Shall Community Facilities District No. 2000-1 of the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority be authorized to continue financing maintenance, improvements, and services to bicycle trails, community athletic fields, and Tahoe Paradise Park, with the Bicycle Advisory Committee guiding bicycle trail spending, by continuing to levy special taxes for 30 additional years, beginning July 1, 2030, such special tax rate calculated by property use, generating approximately $645,000 per year, increased by 2% annually, all as provided in South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority Resolution No. 2025-01?”
541
Council Agenda Report- May 5, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Attached to this item is a draft resolution supporting Measure G, as directed by City Council.
Financial Implications: Measure G is projected to generate approximately $645,000 per year beginning in 2030. A portion of these funds will come to the City to cover costs to maintain certain recreation facilities such as bike trails and the community playfields.
If the voters approve Measure G, the City would be provided funding as follows:
Increase the annual contribution for maintenance of the Community Playfields at Lake Tahoe Community College (LTCC) from $50,000 to $90,000. Broadens bike trails eligible for JPA maintenance funds within the City and County to existing and new Class 1 or shared-use bicycle trails.
Increase annual bicycle trail maintenance payments to the City and County from $5,000/mile to $10,000/mile for all eligible trails.
Allows for all remaining special tax funds not needed to administer the JPA or to make the prescribed payments noted above, to be awarded to the City and County by the JPA, after consultation with the Bicycle Advisory Committee, for the maintenance and improvement of the bicycle trail network located in the Community Facilities District that is owned and operated by the City or County, respectively, and for other bicycle related facilities, services and/or programs within the Community Facilities District.
Environmental Considerations: This resolution is not a project requiring environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) (creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve commitment to any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment).
Policy Implications: Continued funding for trails and recreation facilities within the City is consistent with Strategic Plan priorities to provide “Recreation and Equitable Access for All.” 542
Resolution 2026-XXX May 5, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 5, 2026
Resolution in Support of Measure G to Renew Funding for Recreation Facilities Maintenance
BACKGROUND
A. On July 11, 2000, the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority (JPA), was created, and consists of the City of South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado County, and Tahoe Paradise Resort Improvement District.
B. In 2000, the voters passed a special parcel tax known as Measure S for Community Facilities District No. 2000-1 of the JPA, with the purpose of providing a funding source for recreation facilities and maintenance thereof within the boundaries of the JPA, including within city limits. Measure S had a term of 30 years and expires in 2030.
C. Under Measure S, owners of residential parcels currently pay $18 per year. Measure S currently brings in approximately $650,000 per year to fund recreation facility maintenance within the boundaries of the JPA. There is currently no identified alternative funding source for recreation facility maintenance.
D. The JPA Board passed Resolution No. 2025-01 to place a measure on the ballot for June 2, 2026, which has been labeled as Measure G. Measure G would extend the special tax for an additional 30 years, beginning July 1, 2030, and allow it to be increased by 2 percent annually:
“Shall Community Facilities District No. 2000-1 of the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority be authorized to continue financing maintenance, improvements, and services to bicycle trails, community athletic fields, and Tahoe Paradise Park, with the Bicycle Advisory Committee guiding bicycle trail spending, by continuing to levy special taxes for 30 additional years, beginning July 1, 2030, such special tax rate calculated by property use, generating approximately $645,000 per year, increased by 2% annually, all as provided in South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority Resolution No. 2025-01?”
E. The City Council of South Lake Tahoe wishes to express its support for Measure G.
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:
Adopts an official position in support of Measure G on the June 2, 2026 ballot. 543
Resolution 2026-XXX May 5, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 5, 2026 by the following vote:
Yes:
No:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
544
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 5, 2026
Agenda Item #:19
Agenda Item: Status of Efforts to Provide Electrical Service for Ski Run Farmer’s Market Executive Summary: A status report on the efforts to provide electrical service at the Ski Run Farmer's Market.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: 1) Pass a Motion providing direction on advancing the design of this project; or, 2) Take no action.
Responsible Staff Member: Mohammad Qureshi, Director of Public Works, and Branden Gardella, Project Manager
Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Electrical Service for Ski Run Farmers Market.docx 02-Status of Ski Run Electrical.pptx
545
Council Agenda Report May 5, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 5, 2026
Title: Status of Efforts to Provide Electrical Service for Ski Run Farmer’s Market Location: Ski Run Boulevard, South Lake Tahoe, CA
Responsible Staff Member: Mohammad Qureshi, Director of Public Works, and Branden Gardella, Project Manager
Background: At the March 10, 2026 meeting, Councilmember Robbins requested (Roberts seconded) a status report on the efforts to provide electric power for the Ski Run Farmers Market prior to the start of the market’s season.
Issue and Discussion:
The Department of Public Works has been exploring the provision of electrical based on the request of a council member. Much of this work was done under the direction of the previous Director of Public Works.
Preliminary discussions were held with Liberty Utilities. However, design services have not yet been requested. Once a location for a service cabinet with a meter is identified, Liberty Utilities will design a connection from their system to the service cabinet. This usually involves connecting to an underground vault or a transformer on an overhead pole. This may also require Liberty to install a new transformer at the City’s expense. The City would also be responsible for the infrastructure needed to connect to Liberty’s source of power. This includes conduit and the service cabinet where the meter will be located.
Discussions have been held with the Friends of Ski Run about the needs for vendors. Based on these discussions, there does not appear to be significant interest on the part of vendors in using electric power for their operations. Specifically, food truck vendors are reluctant to change their operations for one of their multiple locations. It should be noted that vendors would need to procure power cords and surge protectors compatible with any system the City might provide. This additional equipment could cost each vendor between $500-$,1000.
Staff have developed multiple concepts for where service could be established. However, all concepts have significant challenges to solve before a complete system design is available. First and foremost, a distribution system needs to be provided. However, that involves underground conduit to connect a potential service cabinet with connection points. Because there is a fire lane and multi-use path that need to be kept free of obstructions, connection points would have to be placed between existing sidewalks and paths and curb/edge of pavement. There is limited space available and protecting these connection points during winter will be very challenging since it is where snow will be plowed and stored.
Additionally, a system for collecting reimbursement of electrical usage costs will need to be developed. By constructing this system, the City will become the party responsible for paying for the electricity bill. A mechanism to recoup that cost will be needed. Most likely that will need to become part of the agreement that allows use of Ski Run Blvd. for the Farmer’s Market. Then the operator will need to pass that cost along to the vendors presumably.
546
Council Agenda Report May 5, 2026 Page 2 of 2
A plan for maintaining the system will need to be developed. The City does not have an electrician on staff.
Currently, we utilize contractors under the CUPCAA procurement policy for electrical work on an as needed basis. The City is considering requesting proposals for maintenance of lighting both existing lighting systems and new lights that will become City responsibility when the US 50 lighting project is completed later this year.
Financial Implications:
The preliminary budget for a complete system, including design plans and specifications, is between $200,000 and $400,000. Initially a design package that could be used to request bids for construction will be needed and is expected to cost between $50,000 and $100,000. A CIP account (301-60083) was established with an appropriation of $80,000. Approximately, $79,200 remains available for use.
Environmental Considerations:
This action is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines section 15262 (feasibility and planning studies involving possible future actions which have not been approved, adopted, or funded).
Policy Implications:
Evaluating use of energy sources aligns with the City’s strategic policy to Protect the Natural Environment. 547
Status of Ski Run
Farmer’s Market
Electrical service
548
Completed Tasks
• New Service Applications Initiated with
Liberty
• Discussions with Friends of Ski Run
• Developed conceptual plans
549
Remaining Tasks
Liberty service connection ($20,000)
• Transformer/Connection to Vault
• Conduit
• Service Cabinet for meter
• Meter Install
550
Remaining Tasks
Underground Distribution Infrastructure
($200,000)
• Plans, Specifications, & Estimates
• Approx 650’ of trenching required.
• Conduit & Cable Installation
• Paving & Patching
551
552
Remaining Tasks
Distribution to Vendors ($20,000)
• Power stations/distribution boxes
553
Costs to Vendors
• Cords and Surge Protectors
• ($500-$1,000 per vendor)
• Conversion of existing systems
554
Challenges
• Lack of Demand from Vendors
• Maintenance
• Lack of physical space for infrastructure
• Conflicts with shared use path
• Weather impacts
• Outdoor rated equipment
• Recovery of usage costs
555
Staff Recommendation
Focus on other priorities until there is significant
demand from vendors
556
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 5, 2026
Agenda Item #:20
Agenda Item: Levy of Assessment for Ski Run Business Improvement District for Business License Year 2026/2027
Executive Summary: The City Council must hold a public hearing and shall consider all protests from business owners within the Ski Run Business Improvement District, received either in writing and submitted to the City Clerk prior to the public hearing or presented orally at the public hearing. If a majority of businesses (based on their BID assessment) do not provide written protests, the Council may adopt a new Resolution confirming the report as originally filed or as changed. This will allow the Finance Department to include the BID assessments with the annual business license renewal billing beginning in May for the 2026/2027 business tax year.
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution confirming the Ski Run Business Improvement District annual report and levying the assessment for business license year 2026/2027.
Responsible Staff Member: Ben Hannah - Accountant II
Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01 Staff Report Ski Run BID 05-05-2026.docx
02-Resolution Ski Run BID
03 SRBID 2026-2027 Budget Proposal.pdf
04 SRBID 2026-2027 Prior Year vs Adopted.pdf
05 SRBID 2026-2027 Budget Proposal includes Measure S.pdf 06 Ski Run BID Report 2026.pdf
07 AB 1572 (Friedman)_Irrigation Mandate.pdf
557
Council Agenda Report May 5, 2026
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 5, 2026
Title: Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Report and Budget Location: Ski Run Blvd
Responsible Staff Member: Ben Hannah, Accountant II (530) 542-6079 Background: On November 19, 2002, City Council formed the Ski Run Business Improvement District (SRBID) by adopting Resolution No. 2002-71. The Ski Run BID was formed under the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, which is codified at California Streets & Highways Code 36500-36551. This Staff Report has been composed in accordance with Streets & Highways Code 36533 to satisfy the annual requirements for the Ski Run BID.
Issue and Discussion: This item completes the second step of the two step process listed below as required by Streets & Highways Code section 36535. Step 1, required by Streets & Highways Code sections 36533-36534, was completed on March 10, 2026 and a public hearing was scheduled for May 5, 2026.
Step 1: Every year the Ski Run BID Advisory Board is required to submit an Annual Report and proposed budget for approval to the City Council (City Ordinance No. 927, Section 2.9). The Council then adopts a “Resolution of Intention”, which indicates the Council’s intention to levy an assessment to the BID members and sets a time and place of a future Public Hearing whereby members of the BID can provide written protests on the content of the Report for the upcoming fiscal year.
Step 2: The City Council must hold a public hearing and shall consider all protests from business owners within the Ski Run Business Improvement District, received either in writing and submitted to the City Clerk prior to the Public Hearing or presented orally at the Public Hearing. If a majority of businesses (based on their BID assessment) do not provide written protests, the Council may adopt a new Resolution confirming the report as originally filed or as changed. This will allow the Finance department to include the BID assessments with the annual business license renewal billing beginning in May for the 2026/2027 business tax year.
Annual Assessments:
1. There are no changes to the boundaries or areas of benefit in the area.
2. The method of assessment for 2026/2027 remains the same as in previous years and is as follows:
a. 25% of the annual Business and Professions Tax and, if applicable 558
Council Agenda Report May 5, 2026
b. $2.00 per lineal foot of property frontage on Ski Run Blvd, if the property is owned by a business license holder.
Revenues: The Ski Run BID receives operating revenues from the annual assessments estimated to be $13,600 for business license year 2026/2027 which is $400 lower than the projection for the previous year 2025/2026. The reduction is due to at least one commercial business having been converted to a vacation home rental which are not required to obtain a City business license, and therefore do not pay SRBID fees. The next year’s projections assume that revenues will be lower than 2025/2026 projections but about the same as 2025/2026 actuals due to a relatively stable market.
Expenses: BID assessments will continue to be used for the allowable expenses of landscape maintenance which includes landscape maintenance, water, and electricity. The City Public Works Department performs landscape maintenance for six months beginning May 1st and ending October 31st. Activities include sprinkler repair, weeding, clean-up, and debris removal. Historically, the assessments have not been adequate to fully cover these costs, which would be the case for year 2026/2027 as well.
The proposed budget is based on last year’s actual revenues and expenses with exceptions related to California mandate AB1572 which prohibits the use of potable water to irrigate nonfunctional turf on commercial, municipal, institutional, and multifamily residential properties.
The City worked with Ski Run BID and Friends of Ski Run to fulfill the mandate requirements by converting the landscaping to a more sustainable and natural turf free environment. While these improvements will likely not reduce labor costs, savings are expected in water usage and machine maintenance reflected in the projected budget for fiscal year 2026/2027.
The proposed budget for the Ski Run BID reflects a projected shortfall of $12,700 compared to $13,500 approved for the prior year General Fund subsidy. Utilities are likely to be lower with reduced water consumption. Landscaping costs and assessment revenues are expected to remain stable with the expenses continuing to exceed BID revenues requiring an ongoing General Fund subsidy.
Financial Implications: The proposed 2026/2027 Ski Run Landscaping (fund 280) Funding Plan is attached and will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2026/2027 City budget. The plan includes the BID assessment funded portion for landscaping and maintenance and the City General fund portion from the Parks Department for landscaping and maintenance.
For fiscal year 2026/2027, staff recommends budgeting $12,700 to be transferred in from the General Fund in order to reflect a true cost and achieve a balanced budget for the Ski Run Business Improvement District.
Environmental Considerations: This is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) (organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).
Policy Implications: Consistent with the California laws and City policies. 559
Resolution 2026-XXX May 5, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 5, 2026
Confirming the Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Report and Levying the Assessment Referred to in the Report for Business License Year 2026-2027
BACKGROUND
A. On March 10, 2026 the South Lake Tahoe City Council adopted a resolution of Intent to Levy assessments within the Ski Run Business Improvement District as required by California Streets & Highways code sections 36533-36534.
B. On May 5, 2026, the City Council held a public hearing as required by California Streets & Highways code section 36525 where they considered evidence and testimony submitted at that public hearing.
C. The City Council did not receive written or oral protests against the levy of assessments submitted by payers of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total assessments of the entire district. Therefore, the City Council has determined that action is necessary and appropriate to ensure continuation of the district.
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:
1. Finds that the recitals set forth herein are true and correct.
2. Confirms the report submitted by the Ski Run BID advisory board as originally filed. A true and correct copy of that report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3. Adopts the 2026-2027 budget submitted by the Ski Run BID Advisory Board as originally filed on March 10, 2026
4. Declares that the adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of the Ski Run BID assessments at the rates specified in the report for the fiscal year specified in the report.
5. Declares that this Resolution is effective on its adoption. 560
Resolution 2026-XXX May 5, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 5, 2026 by the following vote:
Yes:
No:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
561
BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment 13,600 $
Total Revenue 13,600 $
BID Operating Expenses
Water/Sewer Utilities 6,300 $
Landscaping 17,000 $
Electricity for Timers 3,000 $
Total Expenses 26,300 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (12,700) $
Other Revenue Funding Sources
General Fund Subsidy $ 12,700
Ski Run BID Fund Balance - $
Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) ** $ -
Provided for reference only. The above budget will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2026/2027 City budget.
Water Consumption expected to be reduced due to
improvements made under CA Mandate AB1572
BID Projected Budget FY 2026/2027
FUND 280 - SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Total General Fund Subsidy $12,700
562
BID Operating Revenue BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment 14,000 $ BID Assessment 13,600 $
Total Revenue 14,000 $ Total Revenue 13,600 $
BID Operating Expenses BID Operating Expenses
Water/Sewer Utilities 7,500 $ Water/Sewer Utilities 6,300 $ Landscaping 17,000 $ Landscaping 17,000 $
Electricity for Timers 3,000 $ Electricity for Timers 3,000 $ Total Expenses 27,500 $ Total Expenses 26,300 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (13,500) $ BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (12,700) $ Other Revenue Funding Sources Other Revenue Funding Sources General Fund Subsidy 13,500 $ General Fund Subsidy 12,700 $ Ski Run BID Fund Balance - $ Ski Run BID Fund Balance - $ Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $ - Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $ - Provided for reference only. Provided for reference only. The above budget will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2026/2027 City budget.
BID Adopted Budget FY 2025/202
6 Total General Fund Subsidy $13,50
0 BID Projected Budget FY 2026/2027
Total General Fund Subsidy $12,70
0 Ski Run Landscaping and Bike Trail Maintenance Funding Plan 2025/2026 Adopted Budget and 2026/2027 Projected Budget Administered and Accounted for by City
FUND 280 - SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND 280 - SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 563
BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment
Total Revenue 13,600 $
BID Operating Expenses
Landscaping $ 17,000
Water/Sewer Utilities $ 6,300
Electricity for Timers $ 3,000
Total Expenses 26,300 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (12,700) $
Other Revenue Funding Sources
General Fund Subsidy $ 12,700
Ski Run BID Fund Balance $ -
Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $ -
Measure S Operating Revenue
STAR Ballot Measure (Fund 281) $ 13,000
Total Revenue 13,000 $
Measure S Operating Expenses
Employee Compensation $ 3,100
Technical Services $ 4,800
Snow Removal $ -
Sand and Snow Poles $ 2,000
Electricity for Lights $ 3,900
Total Expenses 13,800 $
Measure S Net Operating Revenue/(Expenses) (800) $
Provided for reference only.
Note: Fund 281 Deficit is covered by prior year fund balance.
BID Projected Budget FY 2026-2027
FUND 280 - SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FUND 281 - MEASURE S RECREATION SKI RUN BIKE TRAIL
Total General Fund Subsidy $12,700
564
February 12, 2026
Ben Hannah
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Subject: 2025 Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Report Dear Mr. Hannah,
We thank the City and City Council for their continued support of the Ski Run Business Improvement District (BID), businesses on Ski Run Boulevard, and neighbors who call this area home. Ski Run BID members continue to pay their annual assessment and continue to champion what we think is one of the greatest boulevards in the country.
Community Events
Ski Run continues to host community-focused events during the summer months. Our events promote community and Ski Run businesses.
In 2025, events included:
● Ski Run Farmers Market – June through September. To continue to improve this beloved annual market series, the BID looked to partner with a local production company. Sun Snow Event Co was contracted at the beginning of 2025 and elevated the Ski Run Market with more vendors, more music and more dates. The market series remains a community favorite, driving foot traffic to Ski Run businesses in addition to supporting the many local vendors.
● Longest Dinner Table in Tahoe - June. More than 200 community members gathered on Ski Run to share a meal and raise funds for a local non-profit. In 2025, the event raised $20,000 for local families in South Lake Tahoe. The Longest Table is growing! They’re expanding to three full blocks in 2026. Building on last year’s success, they’re expanding their partnership with the Marcella Foundation to drive even more funding and 565
awareness toward the local projects our community needs most. Nearly 1,000 locals will share a meal to celebrate the South Lake Tahoe community. ● Tahoe Brewfest – August. For the second year in a row, Ski Run hosted the largest fundraiser event for the Boys and Girls Club of Lake Tahoe. This event celebrates all that is special about South Lake Tahoe’s mountain culture: our beer, our crafts, our environment and, most of all, our community.
Landscaping Changes
In July 2025, members of the BID met with city staff regarding the re-landscaping and water conservation project along Ski Run Blvd between the bike path and street curb. For years, the BID has advocated for the conversion of grass to something more environmentally friendly and looked forward to partnering with the city on this statewide initiative.
We understood that the city needed to work within budget and time constraints and appreciated the opportunity to have input on ways to prioritize and stretch the budget. While we fully support the project in its intent, concerns remain regarding the long-term aesthetics and ongoing maintenance. We need to ensure the balance between “natural” landscaping and a “well taken care of” commercial core area.
Transportation and Environment
● We also support expanding bike and pedestrian trails that connect to Ski Run Blvd. including the complete streets and paths on Spruce Ave and path connections to Bijou Elementary School and Stateline.
● We are excited about the planned Ski Run Mountain to Marina Green Infrastructure Plan. We support projects to reduce stormwater pollution from reaching Lake Tahoe, ● Thank you for continuing to work with Heavenly Mountain to address parking management and overflow parking issues. Parking for access to the ski resort in the winter can impact all of Ski Run Boulevard. Long-term solutions will require collaboration between businesses on Ski Run, Heavenly, and the City.
In the next year, we look forward to continuing to offer great community events and support projects that promote a vibrant Ski Run and broader South Lake Tahoe Community.
Sincerely,
Chris McNamara
Corey Rich
Devin Middlebrook
Jeff Cowen
Rachel Carlson
566
AB 1572
Date of Hearing: April 18, 2023
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON WATER, PARKS, AND WILDLIFE
Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, Chair
AB 1572 (Friedman) – As Amended April 11, 2023
SUBJECT: Potable water: nonfunctional turf
SUMMARY: Prohibits the use of potable water to irrigate nonfunctional turf on commercial, municipal, institutional, and multifamily residential properties. Begins a phase-in of this ban for specified property types beginning January 1, 2026. Specifically, this bill:
1) Defines “nonfunctional turf” as any turf not located in areas designated by a property owner or a government agency for recreational use or public assembly. Excludes cemeteries from this definition.
2) Prohibits the use of potable water to irrigate nonfunctional turf on commercial, industrial, municipal, institutional, and multifamily residential properties and phases this ban in as follows:
a) Beginning January 1, 2026, for all properties owned or leased by the Department of General Services;
b) Beginning January 1, 2027, for all municipal and institutional properties, except those in disadvantaged communities (DAC);
c) Beginning January 1, 2028, for all commercial and industrial properties; d) Beginning January 1, 2029, for all multifamily residential properties, except those in DACs; and
e) Beginning January 1, 3030, for all multifamily residential affordable housing properties and all municipal properties in a DAC.
3) Exempts the use of potable water to ensure the health of trees and other perennial plantings or to address immediate health and safety needs from the prohibition outlined in #2, above. 4) Permits the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) to extend compliance dates outlined in #2, above, by up to three years through regulation. 5) Requires the State Water Board to adopt regulations by July 1, 2025, to develop procedures and criteria for compliance extensions (e.g., for economic hardship) and to establish methods of compliance certification by property owners.
6) Requires public water systems to update their regulations, ordinances, or policies governing water use no later than January 1, 2026, to incorporate the prohibition on the use of potable water on nonfunctional turf established by this bill and to communicate these requirements to their customers on or before January 1, 2026.
567
AB 1572
7) Requires commercial, industrial, municipal, and institutional property owners with more than 5,000 square feet of irrigated areas to certify to the State Water Board compliance with this bill beginning June 30, 2029 and every three years thereafter through 2038. 8) Requires multifamily residential property owners with more than 5,000 square feet of irrigated areas to certify to the State Water Board compliance with this bill beginning June 30, 2030 and every three years thereafter through 2039. 9) Provides that an entity not in compliance with this bill shall be subject to civil liability of up to $500 per day of violation and any penalties imposed by an urban water supplier. 10) Authorizes a water system, city, county, or city and county to enforce the provisions of this bill.
11) Requires the State Water Board to begin annual compliance audits to track implementation of this bill on July 1, 2030. The State Water Board shall audit two hydrologic regions each year and rotate regions so that every region is audited every five years. The compliance audits shall include visual inspections of specified properties and be posted on the State Water Board’s internet web site.
12) Requires the Department of Water Resources to prioritize water conservation and integrated regional water management (IRWM) funding to replace nonfunctional turf for public water agencies serving DACs and to owners of affordable housing. 13) Requests the Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources within the office of the President of the University of California (Division) to consult with the Department of Education to disseminate information on native and climate-appropriate plants in schools serving K through 12 grades. Requires the Vice President of the Division to report to the Legislature on progress implementing this bill no later than June 30, 2026. 14) Defines various terms for the purposes of this bill, including “affordable housing,” “multifamily residential housing,” “potable water,” and “turf.” EXISTING LAW:
1) Imposes a penalty of up to $500 per day for violations of water rights or orders or regulations adopted by the State Water Board (Water Code § 1846).
2) Establishes a standard for indoor residential water use as follows: (a) 55 gallons per capita daily (gpcd) until January 1, 2025; (b) 47 gpcd beginning January 1, 2025; and (c) 42 gpcd beginning January 1, 2030 (Water Code § 10609.4).
3) Requires the State Water Board, in coordination with DWR, to adopt long-term standards for outdoor residential use, outdoor irrigation with dedicated irrigation meters in conjunction with commercial, industrial, and institutional (CII) water use, and a volume for water loss by June 30, 2022 (Water Code § 10609.2).
4) Defines the following terms relative to water conservation law (Water Code § 10608.12):
a) “Commercial water user” as a water user the provides or distributes a product or service; 568
AB 1572
b) “Disadvantaged community” as a community with an annual median household income that is less than 80 percent of the statewide average;
c) “Industrial water user” as a water user that is primarily a manufacturer or processor of materials or that is primarily engaged in research and development; d) “Institutional water user” as a water user dedicated to public service, including higher education institutions, schools, courts, churches, hospitals, government facilities, and nonprofit research institutions;
e) “Large landscape” as a nonresidential landscape as described by performance measures adopted by the State Water Board; and
f) “Urban retail water supplier” as either a public or private water supplier that provides potable municipal water to more than 3,000 end users or that supplies more than 3,000 acre-feet annually at retail for municipal purposes.
5) Requires each “urban retail water supplier” to calculate its urban water use objective no later than January 1, 2024, and by January 1 every year thereafter. The urban water use objective shall be the sum of the following: (a) aggregate estimated efficient indoor residential water use; (b) aggregate estimated efficient outdoor residential water use; (c) aggregate estimated efficient outdoor CII water use; (d) aggregate estimated efficient water loses; (e) aggregate estimated water use with variances, as appropriate; and (f) bonus incentives for potable reuse (Water Code §10609.20).
6) Declares that the use of potable domestic water for nonpotable uses, including outdoor irrigation, is a waste or unreasonable use of water if recycled water is available for these uses (Water Code § 13550).
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill is keyed fiscal.
COMMENTS:
1) Purpose of this bill. According to the author, “there is an urgent need for additional efforts to reduce unnecessary water use in urban areas. Although drought conditions from 2014- 2017 were said to be the most severe drought since statehood, California saw dry conditions return quickly, with severe curtailments of State Project water deliveries imposed in 2022. At the same time, water supply conditions deteriorated rapidly in the Colorado River Basin, a major source of water for urban Southern California.” The author notes efforts currently underway to address the shortfall of water in the Colorado River Basin as further evidence of the need for California to reduce its overall water use and demand on Colorado River water in particular.
The author notes “a large portion of California’s treated drinking water is used to irrigate urban landscapes. In a year without drought restrictions, roughly half of all publicly supplied water is used outdoors, primarily for landscape irrigation…. In a study published in 2005, it was estimated that California had approximately 2.75 million acres of turf grass. Nearly all this turf requires irrigation to survive, and nearly all the irrigation is with treated drinking water.”
569
AB 1572
Finally, the author argues that this bill “is an extension of past and current state policies to reduce unnecessary water consumption in urban landscapes. It would prohibit the use of drinking water for the irrigation of nonfunctional turf located on commercial, industrial, municipal, institutional, and multifamily residential properties, in stages between January 1, 2026 and January 1, 2029. This will help California businesses and communities save both water and money, and transition to sustainable alternatives that can keep landscapes beautiful.”
2) Background. California, along with other Western states, experienced severe drought conditions from 2021 until this winter. Drought, even extreme drought, is not unusual for this region, but the fact that California experienced such severe dry conditions only a few years after its worst drought on record from 2012-16 has raised alarmed bells across the state and the West. The situation in the Colorado River Basin has led U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Camille Touton to call for a reduction in use of Colorado River water of between 2 million acre-feet (AF) and 4 million AF annually to avoid loss of power generation and to ensure water deliveries.
California drought emergency 2021-23. Fortunately, wetter conditions allowed Governor Newsom to lift the drought emergency for most regions of the state on March 28, 2023, by issuing Executive Order (EO) N-5-23. The relief is welcome, but the previous three years have been severe. The Governor first declared a drought emergency on April 2021, directing various actions to conserve water, and extended the emergency due to ongoing drought conditions seven times. Because of worsening drought conditions in early 2022, the Governor expanded the state’s drought response by issuing EO N-7-22 on March 28, 2022.
EO N-7-22 directed a suite of actions, including that the State Water Board consider adopting an emergency regulation banning the irrigation of “nonfunctional turf” in the commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors.
Emergency regulation on nonfunctional turf. Following the Governor’s direction, the State Water Board adopted an emergency regulation banning the irrigation of decorative grass, with limited exceptions, that took effect on June 10, 2022. The emergency regulation remains in effect until June 10, 2023. The definition of “nonfunctional turf” in the emergency regulation is slightly narrower than this bill in that it is limited to ornamental turf:
“turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events. Non-functional turf does not include sports fields and turf that is regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events." In contrast, this bill does not narrow its definition of “nonfunctional turf” to turf that is “solely ornamental,” but rather defines it by its designated use. The emergency regulation also includes homeowners’ associations (HOA) and common interest developments (CID) in the definition of “commercial, industrial and institutional,” but does not include actual residences within HOAs or CIDs. This bill in contrast does not cover HOAs and CIDs in its current form.
Governor’s “California’s Water Supply Strategy: Adapting to a Hotter, Drier Future” (August 2022). Governor Newsom released this strategy to address a projected 10% decrease in water supply (6 million to 9 million AF of water) by 2040 due to climate change. To address this shortfall, the strategy sets targets and outlines actions for increased water recycling, desalination, stormwater capture, and water conservation as well as an expansion of 4 million AF of surface and underground storage. Achieving the targets laid out in the 570
AB 1572
strategy would “close the evaporative gap.” One action highlighted is the conversion of 500 million square feet of ornamental turf by 2030. The Administration asserts this can be achieved through programs and policies that incentivize turf conversion and that, if this goal is achieved, it could save 66,000 AF of water annually at a cost of $1 billion. “The Untapped Potential of California’s Urban Water Supply: Water Efficiency, Water Reuse, and Stormwater Capture.” This report by the Pacific Institute released in April 2022 estimates that conversion of turf to less water-intensive landscapes on commercial, industrial, and institutional properties could save up to 400,000 AF of water per year.
Nevada nonfunctional turf ban. In 2021, the Nevada Legislature enacted AB 356 (Committee on Ways and Means) that prohibits the use of Colorado River water to irrigate nonfunctional turf on commercial, multi-family, and institutional properties within the service territory of the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) or its member agencies beginning January 1, 2027. SNWA serves more than 2.2 million residents in Southern Nevada, including the Las Vegas metropolitan area. AB 356 directed SNWA to define nonfunctional turf and SNWA has, in turn, developed the following definition: “an irrigated grass area not providing functional use;” SNWA indicates that examples include streetscape turf; grass in front of, between, behind or otherwise adjacent to a properties not zoned singlefamily residential; and turf managed by an HOA that does not provide a recreational benefit to the community. This bill’s definition is similar to that used by SNWA. 3) Arguments in support. This bill is sponsored by the Natural Resources Defense Council and Heal the Bay (sponsors) that argue this bill “will phase out unnecessary water use in urban areas, support communities in saving both water and money and speed the transition to sustainable alternatives that can keep landscapes beautiful.” The sponsors note that California has had policy in place since 1990 to reduce water use for landscape irrigation in urban settings, but that, nonetheless, “a legacy of irrigated decorative grass remains.” 4) Oppose unless amended. The Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) and other associations have taken an “oppose unless amended” position on this bill due to concerns over the definition of “nonfunctional turf” in this bill. ACWA et al. support prohibiting the use of potable water on nonfunctional turf in certain sectors, but are concerned that this bill’s definition is broader than that in the emergency regulations and that the prohibition applies to multifamily housing. In addition, ACWA et al. argue that it is inappropriate to allow water wholesalers and other entities that do not have a direct relationship with individual customers to enforce the provisions of this bill; for this reason, they seek “language that would require coordination with the local water retailer for any enforcement by an entity that is not the retailer.” Finally, ACWA et al. assert that “directing funding intended for IRWM activities to focus on turf replacement is inappropriate” and seek an amendment striking the reference to IRWM funding from this bill. 5) Opposition. The El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) opposes this bill arguing that it undermines local agencies’ discretion and flexibility to meet their urban water use objective as required by AB 1668 and that it will “impose significant new costs on urban retail water suppliers.” EID contends that this bill “is based on a path of scarcity, imposing restrictions and prohibitions on a selective basis. Instead, the Legislature should focus on increasing resilience and enhancing adaptive capacity that will provide opportunities to strengthen water resources management and plan for climate change impacts.” 571
AB 1572
6) Proposed committee amendments. Unlike the emergency regulation, this bill does not cover turf in HOAs, CIDs, and community service organizations that do not have a recreational or other civic purpose. The Committee may wish to consider asking the author to amend this bill to include HOA, CID, and community service organization properties in the prohibition. In addition, this bill prohibits the use of potable water to irrigate nonfunctional turf on “municipal” properties along with commercial, industrial, and institutional. Including “municipal” is likely unnecessary as it appears to have the same meaning as “institutional” properties. The Committee may wish to ask the author to consider striking references to “municipal” in this bill as it may be redundant and could create ambiguity or confusion. The following amendments will address both of these issues:
Amendment 1 – Add the following definitions to Section 10608.12 of the Water Code:
(g) “Common interest development” has the same meaning as in Section 4100 of the Civil Code.
(h) “Community service organization or similar entity” has the same meaning as in Section 4110 of the Civil Code.
(m) “Homeowners’ association” means an “association” as defined in Section 4080 of the Civil Code.
Amendment 2 – Amend Section 10608.14 of the Water Code as follows:
10608.14. (a) The use of potable water for the irrigation of nonfunctional turf located on commercial, industrial, municipal, institutional, and multifamily residential properties is prohibited as of the following dates:
(1) All properties owned or leased by the Department of General Services, beginning January 1, 2026.
(2) All municipal and institutional properties, except those specified in paragraph (5), beginning January 1, 2027.
(3) All commercial and industrial properties, beginning January 1, 2028. (4) All multifamily residential properties, and except those specified in paragraph (5), and all properties of homeowners’ associations, common interest developments, and community service organizations or similar entities, but not including the residences of these entities’ members or separate interests, beginning January 1, 2029. (5) All multifamily residential affordable housing properties and all municipal institutional properties in a disadvantaged community, beginning January 1, 2030. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the use of potable water is not prohibited by this section to the extent necessary to ensure the health of trees and other perennial nonturf plantings, or to the extent necessary to address an immediate health and safety need. (c) The board may extend the compliance date by up to three years for certain persons, institutions, and businesses by regulation.
572
AB 1572
(d) The board shall develop and adopt regulations no later than July 1, 2025, that shall establish both of the following:
(1) Procedures and criteria for compliance extensions, including economic hardship, critical business need, and any other categories the board determines are essential to public health and safety.
(2) Methods of compliance certification to the board by property owners. (e) Public water systems shall revise their regulations, ordinances, or policies governing water service to include the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b), and any extensions thereto adopted by the board no later than January 1, 2026, and shall communicate the requirements to their customers on or before that date. (f) (1) An owner of commercial, industrial, municipal, and institutional property with more than 5,000 square feet of irrigated area other then a cemetery shall certify to the board, commencing June 30, 2029, and every three years thereafter through 2038, that their property is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter. 7) Related legislation. AB 1573 (Friedman) of the current legislative session makes changes to required provisions in the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance developed by DWR, including requiring the use of more native or water efficient plants and a prohibition on the use of nonfunctional turf in new or renovated commercial and industrial areas. AB 1573 is pending before this Committee.
SB 606 (Hertzberg), Chapter 14, Statues of 2018, requires the State Board and DWR to adopt water efficiency regulations, outlines requirements for water suppliers, specifies penalties for violations, and makes technical, conforming changes.
AB 1668 (Friedman), Chapter 15, Statutes of 2018, among other provisions, requires DWR, in consultation with the State Water Board and other stakeholders, to identify small water suppliers and rural communities that may be at risk of drought and water shortage vulnerability by January 1, 2020. Further requires DWR by January 1, 2020, to propose recommendations and guidance regarding the development and use of countywide drought contingency plans to address drought planning for small water suppliers and rural communities.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Heal the Bay (co-sponsor)
Natural Resources Defense Council (co-sponsor)
California Coastal Protection Network
California Institute for Biodiversity
California Water Service Company
Clean Water Action
Defenders of Wildlife
Heal the Bay
Los Angeles Waterkeeper
573
AB 1572
Mono Lake Committee
Natural Resources Defense Council
Sierra Club California
Sonoma County Water Agency
Oppose unless amended
Association of California Water Agencies
CalChamber
California Municipal Utilities Association
California Special Districts Association
City of Roseville
Mesa Water District
Regional Water Authority
Santa Margarita Water District
Opposition
Desert Water Agency
El Dorado Irrigation District
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Analysis Prepared by: Pablo Garza / W., P., & W. / (916) 319-2096 574
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 04 30 2026)
Agenda Item Section
May 7, 8:30-3:30 p.m. Special Closed Session
May 19, 1-5 p.m. Special Closed Session
May 19, 5:30 p.m. Airport Additional FAA Funding Application Runway 18/36 Consent Airport 5 year Master Agreement-environmental Consent
City Attorney Shared Mobility Device Ordinance (Second Reading) Consent Finance Quarterly Budget and Financial Status Report as of March 2026 Consent Investment Portfolio Report as of March 2026 Consent
Parks & Rec Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club City Sponsorship NB Police/CM Ski Run/Heavenly Parking Report NB
AB109 MOU Consent
Public Works Contract Extension SieraCon for Energy Savings Project Consent RMRA Funding Project List Consent
May 26, 11-2 p.m. Special Meeting Ethics and Protocols Update NB June 2, 9 a.m. City Attorney Ord-Non-Residential Structures Abandoned Construction (First ReadNB City Manager Media Production Contract Award Consent
575
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 04 30 2026)
City Clerk Pride Resolution Update Consent
City Manager Use of Cannabis Tax Revenue NB
CivicSpark Budget Request Consent
Dev Services AHSC Transit Agreement with Capitol Corridor JPA and El Dorado TransConsent Sign Ordinance Amendments (Sub Committee Recos) UB
CTC Land Exchange Consent
STR Delinquency Report PH
HR City Manager Contract Award NB
Health Insurance Broker Contract Award Consent
Police/CA Unpermitted VHR Report NB
Public Works CSA 3 Assessment Confirmation PH
CIP Presentation NB
Wildscape Contract Amendment for Upper Bijou Park Creek Consent El Dorado Beach Update NB
June 16, 5:30 p.m.City Attorney Ord-Non-Residential Structures Abandoned Construction (Second R Consent
CC-STRSA
Lukins Bros & TKWC Franchise Agreements Consent
576
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 04 30 2026)
City Clerk Resolution Consolidating Election with EDC Consent City Manager Legislative Agenda UB
Becoming a BearWise Community NB
Finance Direct Charge of Mello-Roos Special Tax for CFD 1995-1 for FY 202 Consent Annual Special Tax for CFD 2001-1 Series 2015 Special Tax Refund Consent Disolution STJPPFA NB
Police SRO Agreement for 2026-2027 School Year Consent
Vista Rise Operating Agreement & Grant report Consent
Public Works Award of Construction Contract for 2026 Cape Sealing Project Consent June 24, 2026, 5 p.m., LTCC, Special City Council Meeting-State of the City Address Aug 11, 9 a.m. Airport Award Runway 1836 Construction Contract Consent City Clerk Conflict of Interest Code Update Consent
City Manager 2026 National Community Survey Report NB
Finance Financial Policies Update inc. Local, State & US Preference Consent Fire RFP Contract Award Cole Property project
Consent
Dev Services Evaluate Feasibility - Res. Area Plan/SB9 & Remove Tourist AccomoNB 577
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 04 30 2026)
Tahoe Living Housing and Mobility Fees UB
Parks & Rec Ice Arena Concessionaire Agreement NB
Public Works Tamarack Culvert Bid Award Consent
El Dorado Beach Phase 2 Bid Award Consent
Drainage Master Plan Consultant Award Consent
Aug 25, 9 a.m. Budget Workshop
Sept 8, 9 a.m. Airport Airport Master Plan adoption NB
City Manager Progress on Joining a CCA NB
Exploration of becoming a public electric utility NB
Informational item - Check Cashing + Bill Pay Services Options NB Dev Services Mid Town Area Plan Adoption PH
Housing Element Final Draft Review NB
Finance Investment Policy Update Consent
Sept 22, 5:30 p.m. Finance Quarterly Budget and Financial Status Report as of June 2026 Consent Investment Portfolio Report as of September 2026 Consent Oct 5, 5:30 p.m. City Clerk Ordinance Increasing City Council Compensation (First Reading) NB 578
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 04 30 2026)
Finance GAAN Limit Consent
Nov 3, 9:30 a.m. City Clerk Ordinance Increasing City Council Compensation (Second Reading) Consent Finance Fiscal year 2025-2026 Budgeted Funds Re-appropriation Consent TID Annual Report NB
Investment Portfolio Report as of September 2026 Consent Nov 17, 5:30 p.m.
Dec 1, 9 a.m. City Clerk Certification of Election
Outgoing Councilmember Recognition
Oath of Office
City Council Re-Organization Mayor/Mayor Pro Tem
2027 City Council Meeting Schedule
Dec 15, 5:30 p.m. Finance Annual ROPS Approval
Quarterly Budget and Financial Status Report as of September 2026 City Clerk
City Manager LTCC Fire Training Center Coverage Agreement Unscheduled/Pending
If Election is Certified
by December 1, if not
these items will be
brought forward
December 15
579
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 04 30 2026)
Grants/Funding for Undergrounding Utilities
CM/CA Rec Center Re-Use Outreach
Dev Services Performance Bond as a Condition of Demolition Fire MOU Ratification of Auto Aid with TDFD
LVFD MOU update for data sharing
CTC Land Access Agreement for Airport project
Parks & Rec Events and Facitilies Naming Rights Discussion El Dorado Boat Ramp Dock Replacement Purchase
Regan Beach Environmental & Design RFP
Future of Senior Center
Police Barton Community Health Needs and Harm Reduction Update SANE Presentation with Barton
Heavenly Village Employee Discount Parking Passes
Ratification of Application for CalOES DVRT
Massage Ordinance Update/Amendments
Employee Parking at Heavenly Village
580
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 04 30 2026)
Police/PW Bike Paths/Speed Bumps, Bike Parking, Vehicle Parking 2026 Update to Parking Fees in the Bellamy Parking Garage Public Works Geothermal Use Discussion Item
Paving Policy Prioritization of Total Users
Award of PD Roof Replacement
TTD US 50 Plans Presentation
Award Lakeview and Ski Run Electrical Upgrades
Facilities Condition Assessment
581