Agenda packet — South Lake Tahoe City Council, May 19, 2026 (part 3 of 4)

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 569
570
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway B, A, F, & E
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 62
36 D 80
37 2D 131
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 250/F/D/X/T
571
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway B, A, F, & E
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 10:40:48
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 20.0in.
572
573
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway B, A, F, & E
This file name = PCR Results for New Flexible 2024‐04‐25 19:22:37 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: Taxiway B, A, F, & E in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Subgrade Modulus =7,500psi (Subgrade Category is D)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 20.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 2.560
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk 2,558 95.00 50 28 112
2 Cessna 182 Skylane 3,110 95.00 50 14 58
3 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,612 95.00 52 36 153
4 Beechcraft Baron 55 5,424 95.00 56 32 145
5 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,536 95.00 66 42 191
6 Beechcraft King Air C90 9,710 95.00 58 56 286
7 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 196 921
8 Beechcraft King Air B100 11,500 95.00 52 4 32
9 Beechcraft King Air B200 12,590 95.00 98 66 503
10 Beechcraft King Air 300 14,100 95.00 92 6 46
11 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 52 406
12 BeechJet‐400/400A 16,300 95.00 90 14 72
13 Learjet 45/55B 21,500 95.00 201 44 336
14 Cessna Citation VI/VII 23,200 95.00 168 116 827
15 S‐30 30,000 95.00 75 108 741
16 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 70 614
17 Dassault Falcon 2000 35,000 95.00 197 86 797
18 Dassault Falcon 900B/C 45,500 95.00 145 34 335
19 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 98 1,002
20 DHC‐7 43,799 93.60 228 2 19
21 ERJ‐140 46,738 95.00 153 10 104
22 C‐123 60,000 95.00 100 34 263
23 F‐15C 68,000 95.00 340 2 11
24 Gulfstream‐G‐III 70,200 95.00 175 24 256
25 Gulfstream‐G‐IV 75,000 95.00 185 62 663
26 Gulfstream G‐V/G500/G550 90,900 95.00 188 54 622
27 D‐100 100,000 95.00 140 60 752
28 Cessna Citation V 16,500 95.00 130 44 209
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft Name Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of
critical aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/D
1 Gulfstream G‐
V/G500/G550 120 81,340 24.2 284.6
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(D) ACR/F/D
1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk 2,558 95 50 4.6 9.4
575
1 Gulfstream G‐
V/G500/G550 120 81,340 24.2 284.6
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(D) ACR/F/D
1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk 2,558 95 50 4.6 9.4
2 Cessna 182 Skylane 3,110 95 50 4.6 11.1
3 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,612 95 52 4.6 12.7
4 Beechcraft Baron 55 5,424 95 56 5.7 19.3
5 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,536 95 66 6.8 24.5
6 Beechcraft King Air C90 9,710 95 58 8.7 35.4
7 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 12.1 62.1
8 Beechcraft King Air B100 11,500 95 52 7.1 26.1
9 Beechcraft King Air B200 12,590 95 98 8.2 32
10 Beechcraft King Air 300 14,100 95 92 9.0 37.1
11 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 9.5 40.6
12 BeechJet‐400/400A 16,300 95 90 12.4 64.4
13 Learjet 45/55B 21,500 95 201 12.7 67.5
14 Cessna Citation VI/VII 23,200 95 168 14.3 84.1
15 S‐30 30,000 95 75 16.8 113.9
16 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 17.9 129.1
17 Dassault Falcon 2000 35,000 95 197 16.9 115.7
18 Dassault Falcon 900B/C 45,500 95 145 19.4 159.2
19 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 18.6 142
20 DHC‐7 43,799 93.6 228 18.2 135.2
21 ERJ‐140 46,738 95 153 18.3 136.8
22 C‐123 60,000 95 100 22.5 236.7
23 F‐15C 68,000 95 340 24.7 299.5
24 Gulfstream‐G‐III 70,200 95 175 23.1 256.2
25 Gulfstream‐G‐IV 75,000 95 185 23.9 277.6
26 Gulfstream G‐V/G500/G550 90,900 95 188 25.7 326
27 D‐100 100,000 95 140 25.5 320.9
28 Cessna Citation V 16,500 95 130 12.8 68.3
576
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway B, A, F, & E
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 142 247.5 400
2 Cessna Citation X 129.1 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 87.8 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 62.1 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 40.6 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 24.3 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 12.6 ‐ 3,500
577
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway B, A, F, & E
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Surface 8.5 200,000 0 0.35 0
2 User Defined 8.0 30,000 0 0.35 0
3 User Defined 3.5 20,000 0 0.35 0
4 Subgrade 0 7,500 5 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk 2,558 28 2
2 Cessna 182 Skylane 3,110 14 2
3 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,612 36 2
4 Beechcraft Baron 55 5,424 32 2
5 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,536 42 2
6 Beechcraft King Air C90 9,710 56 2
7 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 196 2
8 Beechcraft King Air B100 11,500 4 2
9 Beechcraft King Air B200 12,590 66 2
10 Beechcraft King Air 300 14,100 6 2
11 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 52 2
12 BeechJet‐400/400A 16,300 14 2
13 Learjet 45/55B 21,500 44 2
14 Cessna Citation VI/VII 23,200 116 2
15 S‐30 30,000 108 3
16 Cessna Citation X 36,000 70 3
17 Dassault Falcon 2000 35,000 86 3
18 Dassault Falcon 900B/C 45,500 34 3
19 CRJ100/200 47,700 98 3
20 DHC‐7 43,799 2 3
21 ERJ‐140 46,738 10 3
22 C‐123 60,000 34 3
23 F‐15C 68,000 2 3
578
2 User Defined 8.0 30,000 0 0.35 0
3 User Defined 3.5 20,000 0 0.35 0
4 Subgrade 0 7,500 5 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk 2,558 28 2
2 Cessna 182 Skylane 3,110 14 2
3 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,612 36 2
4 Beechcraft Baron 55 5,424 32 2
5 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,536 42 2
6 Beechcraft King Air C90 9,710 56 2
7 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 196 2
8 Beechcraft King Air B100 11,500 4 2
9 Beechcraft King Air B200 12,590 66 2
10 Beechcraft King Air 300 14,100 6 2
11 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 52 2
12 BeechJet‐400/400A 16,300 14 2
13 Learjet 45/55B 21,500 44 2
14 Cessna Citation VI/VII 23,200 116 2
15 S‐30 30,000 108 3
16 Cessna Citation X 36,000 70 3
17 Dassault Falcon 2000 35,000 86 3
18 Dassault Falcon 900B/C 45,500 34 3
19 CRJ100/200 47,700 98 3
20 DHC‐7 43,799 2 3
21 ERJ‐140 46,738 10 3
22 C‐123 60,000 34 3
23 F‐15C 68,000 2 3
24 Gulfstream‐G‐III 70,200 24 3
25 Gulfstream‐G‐IV 75,000 62 3
26 Gulfstream G‐V/G500/G550 90,900 54 3
27 D‐100 100,000 60 3
28 Cessna Citation V 16,500 44 2
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk 0.00 0.00 5.99
2 Cessna 182 Skylane 0.00 0.00 5.77
3 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 5.65
4 Beechcraft Baron 55 0.00 0.00 5.3
5 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 5.29
6 Beechcraft King Air C90 0.00 0.00 4.69
7 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 5.11
8 Beechcraft King Air B100 0.00 0.00 2.99
9 Beechcraft King Air B200 0.00 0.00 3.15
10 Beechcraft King Air 300 0.00 0.00 3.1
11 Beechcraft King Air 350 000 000 308
579
26 Gulfstream G‐V/G500/G550 90,900 54 3
27 D‐100 100,000 60 3
28 Cessna Citation V 16,500 44 2
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk 0.00 0.00 5.99
2 Cessna 182 Skylane 0.00 0.00 5.77
3 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 5.65
4 Beechcraft Baron 55 0.00 0.00 5.3
5 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 5.29
6 Beechcraft King Air C90 0.00 0.00 4.69
7 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 5.11
8 Beechcraft King Air B100 0.00 0.00 2.99
9 Beechcraft King Air B200 0.00 0.00 3.15
10 Beechcraft King Air 300 0.00 0.00 3.1
11 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 3.08
12 BeechJet‐400/400A 0.00 0.00 4.64
13 Learjet 45/55B 0.00 0.00 3.14
14 Cessna Citation VI/VII 0.00 0.00 3.37
15 S‐30 0.00 0.00 3.79
16 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.96
17 Dassault Falcon 2000 0.00 0.00 2.81
18 Dassault Falcon 900B/C 0.00 0.00 2.64
19 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 2.54
20 DHC‐7 0.00 0.00 2.76
21 ERJ‐140 0.00 0.00 2.5
22 C‐123 0.04 0.04 3.36
23 F‐15C 0.01 0.02 4.54
24 Gulfstream‐G‐III 0.08 0.08 2.43
25 Gulfstream‐G‐IV 0.42 0.43 2.43
26 Gulfstream G‐V/G500/G550 1.15 1.15 2.26
27 D‐100 0.86 1.06 2.07
28 Cessna Citation V 0.00 0.00 5.05

HMA CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk 0.03 0.03 2.32
2 Cessna 182 Skylane 0.00 0.00 3.16
3 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.12
4 Beechcraft Baron 55 0.00 0.00 3.02
5 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.02
6 Beechcraft King Air C90 0.00 0.00 2.83
7 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 2.96
8 Beechcraft King Air B100 0.00 0.00 2.15
9 Beechcraft King Air B200 0.00 0.00 2.23
10 Beechcraft King Air 300 0.00 0.00 2.20
11 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.19
12 BeechJet‐400/400A 0.00 0.00 2.82
13 Learjet 45/55B 0.00 0.00 2.22
14 Cessna Citation VI/VII 0.00 0.00 2.32
15 S‐30 0.00 0.00 2.50
16 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.14
17 Dassault Falcon 2000 0.00 0.00 2.06
18 Dassault Falcon 900B/C 0.00 0.00 1.98
19 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.87
20 DHC‐7 0.00 0.00 1.94
21 ERJ‐140 0.00 0.00 1.83
22 C‐123 0.04 0.04 2.32
23 F‐15C 0.01 0.02 2.78
24 Gulfstream‐G‐III 0.08 0.08 1.87
25 Gulfstream‐G‐IV 0.42 0.43 1.87
26 Gulfstream G‐V/G500/G550 1.15 1.15 1.77
27 D‐100 0.86 1.06 1.59
28 Cessna Citation V 0.00 0.00 2.96
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 581
582
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway K, H, & J
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 32
36 D 48
37 2D 0
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 120/F/D/X/T
583
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway K, H, & J
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 10:59:22
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 20.0in.
584
585
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway K, H, & J
This file name = PCR Results for New Flexible 2024‐06‐25 10:59:22 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: Taxiway K, H, & J in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Subgrade Modulus =4,500psi (Subgrade Category is D)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 20.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 3.170
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 26,886
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 4,768
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 20,255
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 16,431
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 4,108
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 12,156
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 5,555
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/D
1 CRJ100/200 549 43,255 17.5 123.4
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength 586
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 549 43,255 17.5 123.4
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(D) ACR/F/D
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 4.6 12.6
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 6.8 24.3
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 12.1 62.1
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 9.5 40.6
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 14.6 87.8
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 17.9 129.1
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 18.6 142
587
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway K, H, & J
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 142 123.4 400
2 Cessna Citation X 129.1 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 87.8 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 62.1 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 40.6 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 24.3 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 12.6 ‐ 3,500
588
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway K, H, & J
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 User Defined 7.5 150,000 0 0.35 0
2 User Defined 7.5 20,000 0 0.35 0
3 User Defined 5.0 15,000 0 0.35 0
4 Subgrade 0 4,500 3 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.12
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.02
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 2.96
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.19
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.09
6 Cessna Citation X 0.86 0.86 2.14
7 CRJ100/200 2.31 2.31 1.87
589
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.12
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.02
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 2.96
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.19
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.09
6 Cessna Citation X 0.86 0.86 2.14
7 CRJ100/200 2.31 2.31 1.87
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 590
591
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway D and South Hangars
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 40
36 D 61
37 2D 110
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 150/F/C/X/T
592
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway D and South Hangars
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 11:35:30
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 18.0in.
593
594
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway D and South Hangars
This file name = PCR Results for New Flexible 2024‐06‐25 11:35:30 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: Taxiway D and South Hangars in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Subgrade Modulus =10,500psi (Subgrade Category is C)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 18.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 0.090
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 24,851
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 4,422
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 18,816
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 15,642
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 3,925
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 11,593
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 5,345
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/C
1 CRJ100/200 523 55,027 15.5 145.1
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength 595
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 523 55,027 15.5 145.1
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(C) ACR/F/C
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 4.6 12.3
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 5.0 21.7
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 9.8 60.7
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 6.8 33.1
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 10.8 72.8
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 13.8 115.6
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 14.0 118.9
596
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway D and South Hangars
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 118.9 145.1 400
2 Cessna Citation X 115.6 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 72.8 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 60.7 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 33.1 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 21.7 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 12.3 ‐ 3,500
597
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway D and South Hangars
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Surface 4.0 200,000 0 0.35 0
2 User Defined 5.0 20,000 0 0.35 0
3 User Defined 9.0 15,000 0 0.35 0
4 Subgrade 0 10,500 7 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.38
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.26
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.19
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.3
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.19
6 Cessna Citation X 0.02 0.02 2.24
7 CRJ100/200 0.07 0.07 1.95
598
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.38
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.26
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.19
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.3
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.19
6 Cessna Citation X 0.02 0.02 2.24
7 CRJ100/200 0.07 0.07 1.95
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 599
600
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 2
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 30
36 D 50
37 2D 0
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 110/F/C/X/T
601
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 2
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 11:37:47
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 15.0in.
602
603
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 2
This file name = PCR Results for New Flexible 2024‐06‐25 11:37:47 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: GA Apron 2 in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Subgrade Modulus =12,000psi (Subgrade Category is C)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 15.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 3.050
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 21,751
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 3,895
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 16,623
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 14,431
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 3,645
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 10,729
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 5,022
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/C
1 CRJ100/200 1,223 43,934 13.3 107.4
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength 604
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 1,223 43,934 13.3 107.4
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(C) ACR/F/C
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 4.6 12.3
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 5.0 21.7
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 9.8 60.7
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 6.8 33.1
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 10.8 72.8
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 13.8 115.6
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 14.0 118.9
605
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 2
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 118.9 107.4 400
2 Cessna Citation X 115.6 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 72.8 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 60.7 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 33.1 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 21.7 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 12.3 ‐ 3,500
606
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 2
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 User Defined 3.0 150,000 0 0.35 0
2 User Defined 6.0 20,000 0 0.35 0
3 User Defined 6.0 15,000 0 0.35 0
4 Subgrade 0 12,000 8 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.86
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.7
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.61
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.49
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.35
6 Cessna Citation X 2.05 2.05 2.42
7 CRJ100/200 1.00 1.00 2.07
607
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.86
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.7
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.61
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.49
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.35
6 Cessna Citation X 2.05 2.05 2.42
7 CRJ100/200 1.00 1.00 2.07
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 608
609
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 3
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 120
36 D 183
37 2D 316
38 2D/2D2 756
39 PCR 560/R/B/W/T
610
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 3
Analysis Type: PCC Overlay on Flexible
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 11:16:50
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 20.0in.
611
612
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 3
This file name = PCR Results for PCC Overlay on Flexible 2024‐06‐25 11:16:50 Structure name: GA Apron 3 in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: PCC Overlay on Flexible
Subgrade Modulus =15,000psi (Subgrade Category is B)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 20.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 0.000
Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 5,632
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 1,149
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 5,178
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 5,131
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 1,358
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 3,976
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 1,922
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/R/B
1 CRJ100/200 400 158,232 13.6 562.8
Results Table 3. PCC Overlay on Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(B) ACR/R/B
613
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 400 158,232 13.6 562.8
Results Table 3. PCC Overlay on Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(B) ACR/R/B
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 2.0 8.2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 2.0 14.2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 4.0 53.7
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 3.1 32.4
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 4.9 77.4
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 6.1 117.3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 6.6 135.3
614
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 3
Analysis Type: PCC Overlay on Flexible
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 135.3 562.8 400
2 Cessna Citation X 117.3 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 77.4 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 53.7 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 32.4 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 14.2 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 8.2 ‐ 3,500
615
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 3
Analysis Type: PCC Overlay on Flexible
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) k (pci) Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 P‐501 PCC Overlay on Flexible 14.0 4,000,000 0 0.15 650 2 User Defined 2.0 200,000 0 0.35 0
3 User Defined 4.0 40,000 0 0.35 0
4 Subgrade 0 15,000 172.4 0.4 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 14.91
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 12.53
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 11.59
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 7.02
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 6.32
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 6.54
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 5.41
NOTE:
616
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 6.54
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 5.41
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 617
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 4
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 65
36 D 93
37 2D 157
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 250/F/C/X/T
618
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 4
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 11:32:11
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 18.0in.
619
620
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 4
This file name = PCR Results for New Flexible 2024‐06‐25 11:32:11 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: GA Apron 4 in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Subgrade Modulus =12,000psi (Subgrade Category is C)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 18.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 0.000
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 25,872
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 4,596
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 19,538
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 16,038
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 4,017
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 11,876
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 5,451
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/C
1 CRJ100/200 400 80,079 19.9 250.4
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength 621
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 400 80,079 19.9 250.4
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(C) ACR/F/C
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 4.6 12.3
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 5.0 21.7
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 9.8 60.7
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 6.8 33.1
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 10.8 72.8
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 13.8 115.6
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 14.0 118.9
622
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 4
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 118.9 250.4 400
2 Cessna Citation X 115.6 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 72.8 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 60.7 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 33.1 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 21.7 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 12.3 ‐ 3,500
623
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 4
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Surface 2.0 200,000 0 0.35 0
2 User Defined 2.0 150,000 0 0.35 0
3 User Defined 6.0 25,000 0 0.35 0
4 User Defined 8.0 15,000 0 0.35 0
5 Subgrade 0 12,000 8 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.25
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.13
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.07
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.24
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.14
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.19
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.91
624
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.25
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.13
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.07
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.24
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.14
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.19
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.91
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 625
626
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway G & GA Apron 5
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 32
36 D 54
37 2D 0
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 100/F/B/X/T
627
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway G & GA Apron 5
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 11:59:39
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 11.0in.
628
629
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway G & GA Apron 5
This file name = PCR Results for HMA on Aggregate 2024‐06‐25 11:59:39 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: Taxiway G & GA Apron 5 in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
Subgrade Modulus =15,000psi (Subgrade Category is B)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 11.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 1.820
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 17,540
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 3,179
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 13,639
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 12,767
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 3,259
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 9,540
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 4,575
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/B
1 CRJ100/200 830 45,342 10.8 101.1
Results Table 3. HMA on Aggregate ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength 630
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 830 45,342 10.8 101.1
Results Table 3. HMA on Aggregate ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(B) ACR/F/B
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 4.6 11.9
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 4.6 20.3
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 8.0 58.7
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 4.9 27.8
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 8.3 62.4
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 10.6 98.5
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 11.1 107.5
631
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: Taxiway G & GA Apron 5
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Surface 3.0 200,000 0 0.35 0
2 P‐209 Crushed Aggregate 8.0 44,366 0 0.35 0
3 Subgrade 0 15,000 10 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 4.79
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 4.53
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 4.4
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.82
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.63
6 Cessna Citation X 0.94 0.94 2.73
7 CRJ100/200 0.88 0.88 2.27
NOTE
632
6 Cessna Citation X 0.94 0.94 2.73
7 CRJ100/200 0.88 0.88 2.27
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 633
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 6
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 65
36 D 103
37 2D 178
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 240/F/B/X/T
634
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 6
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 12:14:38
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 18.0in.
635
636
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 6
This file name = PCR Results for New Flexible 2024‐06‐25 12:14:38 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: GA Apron 6 in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: New Flexible
Subgrade Modulus =15,000psi (Subgrade Category is B)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 18.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 0.000
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 24,851
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 4,422
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 18,816
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 15,642
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 3,925
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 11,593
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 5,345
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/B
1 CRJ100/200 400 86,240 16.6 238.0
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength 637
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 400 86,240 16.6 238.0
Results Table 3. New Flexible ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(B) ACR/F/B
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 4.6 11.9
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 4.6 20.3
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 8.0 58.7
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 4.9 27.8
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 8.3 62.4
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 10.6 98.5
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 11.1 107.5
638
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 6
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 107.5 238.0 400
2 Cessna Citation X 98.5 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 62.4 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 58.7 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 27.8 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 20.3 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 11.9 ‐ 3,500
639
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 6
Analysis Type: New Flexible
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Surface 3.0 200,000 0 0.35 0
2 User Defined 5.0 44,366 0 0.35 0
3 User Defined 10.0 15,000 0 0.35 0
4 Subgrade 0 15,000 10 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.38
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.26
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.19
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.3
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.19
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.24
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.95
640
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.38
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.26
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.19
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.3
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.19
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.24
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.95
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 641
642
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 7
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 89
36 D 150
37 2D 245
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 350/F/B/X/T
643
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 7
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 12:21:14
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 18.0in.
644
645
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 7
This file name = PCR Results for HMA on Aggregate 2024‐06‐25 12:21:14 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: GA Apron 7 in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
Subgrade Modulus =19,500psi (Subgrade Category is B)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 18.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 0.000
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 24,851
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 4,422
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 18,816
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 15,642
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 3,925
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 11,593
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 5,345
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/B
1 CRJ100/200 400 110,556 19.7 346.5
Results Table 3. HMA on Aggregate ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength 646
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 400 110,556 19.7 346.5
Results Table 3. HMA on Aggregate ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(B) ACR/F/B
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 4.6 11.9
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 4.6 20.3
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 8.0 58.7
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 4.9 27.8
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 8.3 62.4
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 10.6 98.5
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 11.1 107.5
647
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 7
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 107.5 346.5 400
2 Cessna Citation X 98.5 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 62.4 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 58.7 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 27.8 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 20.3 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 11.9 ‐ 3,500
648
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 7
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Surface 4.0 200,000 0 0.35 0
2 P‐209 Crushed Aggregate 8.0 59,106 0 0.35 0
3 P‐154 Uncrushed Aggregate 6.0 22,346 0 0.35 0
4 Subgrade 0 19,500 13 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.38
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.26
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.19
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.3
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.19
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.24
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.95
649
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.38
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.26
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.19
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.3
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.19
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.24
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.95
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 650
651
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Airport Master Record FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)

RUNWAY DATA
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 8
Gross Weight (In THSDS)
35 S 99
36 D 166
37 2D 276
38 2D/2D2 0
39 PCR 390/F/B/X/T
652
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD CDF Graph
FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 8
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
Analysis Run Time: 2024‐06‐25 12:23:24
Last Run: PCR
Design Life = 20.0 Years
Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 18.0in.
653
654
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 8
This file name = PCR Results for HMA on Aggregate 2024‐06‐25 12:23:24 Evaluation pavement type is flexible and design program is FAARFIELD.

Structure name: GA Apron 8 in job file: TVL‐047.JOB.xml Units = US Customary
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
Subgrade Modulus =19,500psi (Subgrade Category is B)
Evaluation Pavement Thickness = 18.0 in.

Pass to Traffic Cycle (PtoTC) Ratio = 1.00
Maximum number of wheels per gear = 2
CDF = 0.000
No aircraft have 4 or more wheels per gear.

Results Table 1. Input Traffic Data
No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross
Weight
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
Annual
Departure
20 Years
Coverage
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95.00 52 3,500 24,851
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95.00 66 600 4,422
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95.00 130 2,500 18,816
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95.00 92 1,500 15,642
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95.00 134 330 3,925
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95.00 189 1,000 11,593
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93.00 160 400 5,345
Results Table 2. PCR Value
No. Aircraft
Name
Critical aircraft Total equiv.
departures
Max allowable Gross Weight of critical
aircraft (lbs)
ACR Thick at max.

MGW (in.) PCR/F/B
1 CRJ100/200 400 120,708 20.7 391.7
Results Table 3. HMA on Aggregate ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength 655
Namedeparturesaircraft (lbs)MGW (in.)
1 CRJ100/200 400 120,708 20.7 391.7
Results Table 3. HMA on Aggregate ACR at Indicated Gross Weight and Strength No. Aircraft Name
Gross
Weight
(lbs)
Percent Gross Weight on Main
Gear
Tire
Pressure
(psi)
ACR Thick (in.)
(B) ACR/F/B
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 95 52 4.6 11.9
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 95 66 4.6 20.3
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo
C550/551 15,000 95 130 8.0 58.7
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 95 92 4.9 27.8
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 95 134 8.3 62.4
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 95 189 10.6 98.5
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 93 160 11.1 107.5
656
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 PCR Graph FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 8
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
No. Aircraft Name Aircraft ACR Calculated PCR Annual Departure 1 CRJ100/200 107.5 391.7 400
2 Cessna Citation X 98.5 ‐ 1,000
3 Hawker‐800/800XP 62.4 ‐ 330
4 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 58.7 ‐ 2,500
5 Beechcraft King Air 350 27.8 ‐ 1,500
6 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 20.3 ‐ 600
7 Cessna 206 Stationair 11.9 ‐ 3,500
657
Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.1 Structure Report FAARFIELD 2.1.1 (Build 12/21/2023)
Job Name: TVL‐047
Structure: GA Apron 8
Analysis Type: HMA on Aggregate
No run has been done on this structure.

Pavement Structure Information by Layer
No. Type Thickness
(in.)
Modulus
(psi) CBR Poisson'sRatio
Strength R
(psi)
1 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Surface 4.0 200,000 0 0.35 0
2 P‐209 Crushed Aggregate 14.0 62,856 0 0.35 0
3 Subgrade 0 19,500 13 0.35 0
Airplane Information
No. Name Gross Wt.
(lbs)
Annual
Departures
% Annual
Growth
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 3,600 3,500 2
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 6,500 600 2
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 15,000 2,500 2
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 15,100 1,500 2
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 28,000 330 3
6 Cessna Citation X 36,000 1,000 3
7 CRJ100/200 47,700 400 3
Additional Airplane Information
Subgrade CDF
No. Name CDF
Contribution
CDF Max
for Airplane
P/C
Ratio
1 Cessna 206 Stationair 0.00 0.00 3.38
2 PA‐31‐325 Navajo C/R 0.00 0.00 3.26
3 Cessna Citation II/Bravo C550/551 0.00 0.00 3.19
4 Beechcraft King Air 350 0.00 0.00 2.3
5 Hawker‐800/800XP 0.00 0.00 2.19
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.24
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.95
NOTE
658
6 Cessna Citation X 0.00 0.00 2.24
7 CRJ100/200 0.00 0.00 1.95
NOTE:

User is responsible for checking frost protection requirements. 659
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program C Woolpert, Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
APPENDIX C: SUMMARY OF PAVEMENT HISTORY AND PAVEMENT SECTIONS 660
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program C Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Summary of Pavement Sections and History.

Pavement
ID Pavement
Designation
Pavement Section (Inches) Pavement History
PCC AC AB or
CTB*
ASB Original Reconstruct Rehabilitation Latest
Overlay
C1-C3 Runway 18/36 - 3 7 20 1958 1968, 2008 - -
C4 Taxiway B - 8.5 8 8 1958 1968, 1970 - 1990
C4 Taxiways A South - 8.5 8 8 1958 1968, 1970 - 1990
C6 Taxiway A North - 7.5 7.5 24 1963 - - 1990
C5 Taxiway A Mid - 4 8 8 1958 1975 - -
C7 Taxiway K - 7.5 7.5 24 1962 - - 1990
C8 Taxiway E East - 6.5 8 - 1958 - - 1968
C9 Taxiway E West - 8.5 8 8 1958 1968, 1970 - 1990
C12 Taxiway F1 - 8.5 8 8 1958 1968, 1970 - 2009
C10 Taxiway F2 East - 7 8 1958 - - 1990
C11 Taxiway F2 West - 8.5 8 8 1958 1968, 1970 - 1968
C13 Taxiway H East - 7.5 7.5 24 1963 - - 1990
C14 Taxiway J - 7.5 7.5 24 1962 - - 1990
C15 Taxiway G - 3 8 8 1958 1975, 2016 - 1989
C16 Apron 2 South - 3 6 6 1969 2010 - -
C17 Apron 2 North - 4 6 13 1950 2010 - 1970
C18 Apron 3 14 2 - 6 Pre (1963) 2009 - 1970
C20 Apron 4 East - 6.25-7 6 8 Pre (1963) 2009, 2019 - 1970 C19 Apron 4 West - 6.25-7 6 8 Pre (1963) 2009, 2019 - 1970 C21 Apron 5a - 3 14 - Pre (1963) 1974, 2014 - -
C22 Apron 5b - 3 14 - Pre (1963) 1974, 2014 - -
661
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program C Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Pavement
ID Pavement
Designation
Pavement Section (Inches) Pavement History
PCC AC AB or
CTB*
ASB Original Reconstruct Rehabilitation Latest
Overlay
C23 Apron 5c - 3 8 - 1968 1987, 2016 - -
C24 Apron 5d - 3 8 - Pre (1969) 2016 - 1989
C25 Apron 6a - 3 8 1974 1989, 2017 - -
C26 Apron 6b - 3 8 1974 2017 - 1989
C27 Apron 7 & 8 - 4 14 - 1974 1989, 2019,2020 - -
C28 Taxiway H West - 2 5 4 Pre (1969) - - -
C29 Taxiway D - 4 6 9 1994 2023 - -
C30-C31 Hangar Taxilanes
and Taxilane D
- 4 5 9 1994 2022, 2023 - -
C32 Terminal Access
Road
- 2 3 5 1969 2009 - -
C33 Terminal Parking 1 - 2 3 5 1969 2009 - -
C34 Terminal Parking 2 - 3 4 22 1969 2010 - -
C35 Terminal Parking 3 - 3 4 4 1969 2010 - -
C36 Terminal Parking 4 - 2 5 - 1998 - - -
*Source: Pavement Maintenance/Management Plan (August 2017) and Historical As-Built Plan Sets • PCC - Portland Cement Concrete
• AC - Asphalt Pavement
• AB – Aggregate Base
• CTB – Cement Treated Base
• ASB – Aggregate Subbase
662
663
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program D Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
APPENDIX D: PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) SAMPLE LOCATION

EXHIBIT
664
SHEET NO:

Layout Tab Name: Layout1 (2)
L:\TVL\TVL AIP-47 Pavement Management Plan_2022\CAD\PLANS\TVL PMMP Exhibit.dwg Plotted By:Gross, Amanda Plotted:April 25, 2024, 12:41:44 PM Last Saved By:Amanda.Gross, 4/25/2024 8:46:46 AM

LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

PROJECT SECTION MAP
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 1 OF 1
®

A WOOLPERT COMPANY
1300 Eastman Avenue ● Suite 214 ● Ventura, CA 93003
Phone: 303.524.3030 ● Fax: 303.524.3031
● jviation.com ●

MATCHLINE - SEE BELOW

MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE LEGEND ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 665
SHEET NO:

Layout Tab Name: Layout1 (3)
L:\TVL\TVL AIP-47 Pavement Management Plan_2022\CAD\PLANS\TVL PMMP Exhibit.dwg Plotted By:Ver, Patrick Plotted:April 4, 2024, 4:21:53 PM Last Saved By:Ver, 4/4/2024 3:35:45 PM

LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

PROJECT SECTION MAP
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 1 OF 1
®

A WOOLPERT COMPANY
1300 Eastman Avenue ● Suite 214 ● Ventura, CA 93003
Phone: 303.524.3030 ● Fax: 303.524.3031
● jviation.com ●

MATCHLINE - SEE BELOW

MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE LEGEND ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 666
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program E Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
APPENDIX E: PCI RATINGS MAPS 2023-2033
667
SHEET NO:

Layout Tab Name: Layout1 (2)
L:\TVL\TVL AIP-47 Pavement Management Plan_2022\CAD\PLANS\TVL PMMP Exhibit - PCI.dwg Plotted By:Gross, Amanda Plotted:May 3, 2024, 10:55:12 AM Last Saved By:Amanda.Gross, 5/3/2024 10:54:46 AM

LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
PCI RATINGS (2023)
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 1 OF 1
®

A WOOLPERT COMPANY
1300 Eastman Avenue ● Suite 214 ● Ventura, CA 93003
Phone: 303.524.3030 ● Fax: 303.524.3031
● jviation.com ● PAVEMENT LEGEND ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PCI LEGEND 75-100 (VERY GOOD) 65-74 (GOOD) 55-64 (FAIR) 45-54 (POOR) BELOW 45 (VERY POOR) PCI RANGE (PCI RATING) 668
SHEET NO:

Layout Tab Name: Layout1 (2)
L:\TVL\TVL AIP-47 Pavement Management Plan_2022\CAD\PLANS\TVL PMMP Exhibit - PCI-5yrs.dwg Plotted By:Gross, Amanda Plotted:June 19, 2024, 9:32:43 AM Last Saved By:Amanda.Gross, 6/19/2024 9:29:04 AM

LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
PCI RATINGS (2028)
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 1 OF 1
®

Layout Tab Name: Layout1 (2)
L:\TVL\TVL AIP-47 Pavement Management Plan_2022\CAD\PLANS\TVL PMMP Exhibit - PCI-10yrs.dwg Plotted By:Gross, Amanda Plotted:June 19, 2024, 9:39:00 AM Last Saved By:Amanda.Gross, 6/19/2024 9:38:35 AM

LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
PCI RATINGS (2033)
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 1 OF 1
®

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
APPENDIX F: CIP (WITH BIL PROJECTS)
671

NEPA CEQA TRPA
Rehabilitate Taxiway A (60’ x 8,541’ (56,400 SY))(Crack Seal/Seal Coat/Paint) $ 506,435 $ - $ 56,271 $ 562,706 CATEX IS/ADDENDUM IEC/MFONSE 10/1/2023 12/31/2024 Rehabilitate General Aviation Apron & TWY E, F & G $ 421,813 $ 46,868 $ 468,681 CATEX IS/MND IEC/MFONSE 10/1/2023 12/31/2024 Acquire SRE (Truck with Plow) $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 33,333 $ 333,333 CATEX N/A N/A 1/1/2025 5/30/2026 Replace Terminal Building Public Area Rooftop HVAC Units, Replace Single Pane Windows in terminal building, Replace failing Mansard Roof Shingles on terminal building $ 159,000 $ 17,667 $ 176,667 CATEX CATEX NONE 11/1/2024 5/31/2025 Airport Terminal Access Road Rehabilitation and Guard Rail Replacement (7,820 SY) (mill/fill) $ 150,000 $ 50,000 $ 22,222 $ 222,222 NONE CATEX NONE 11/25/2025 10/15/2026 Rehabilitate Runway 18/36 (100’ x 8,451’ (94,900 SY)) and Electrical Infrastructure (Design & Engineering) $ 150,000 $ 615,000 $ 85,000 $ 850,000 CATEX IS/ADDENDUM IEC/MFONSE 5/1/2027 12/31/2029 Rehabilitate Runway 18/36 (100’ x 8,541’ (94,900 SY)) and Electrical Infrastructure (Construction) $ 150,000 $ 13,170,000 $ - $ 1,480,000 $ 14,800,000 CATEX IS/ADDENDUM IEC/MFONSE 5/1/2028 12/31/2029 Rehabilitate Parallel Taxiway A (50’ x 8,541’) and Associated Connector Taxiways A-1 and A-4 – A-6 (50’ x 165’) and Electrical Infrastructure (Design & Engineering) (2016 PCI=55) $ 150,000 $ 390,000 $ 60,000 $ 600,000 CATEX CATEX IEC/MFONSE Construct New Connector Taxiways A-2 and A-3 (50’ x 165’) (Including RIM Correction) and Electrical Infrastructure (Design & Engineering) $ 225,000 $ 25,000 $ 250,000 CATEX CATEX IEC/MFONSE Rehabilitate Parallel Taxiway A (50’ x 8,541’) and Associated Connector Taxiways A-1 and A-4 – A-6 (50’ x 165’) and Electrical Infrastructure (Construction) (2016 PCI=55) $ 150,000 $ 10,470,000 $ 1,180,000 $ 11,800,000 CATEX CATEX IEC/MFONSE Construct New Connector Taxiways A-2 and A-3 (50’ x 165’) (Including RIM Correction) and Electrical Infrastructure (Construction) $ 2,700,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 CATEX CATEX IEC/MFONSE CEQA Conduct Environmental Study Improve Airport Drainage – (Apron-Edge (5,700 LF) & Associated Outfalls) $ - $ 550,000 $ 550,000 N/A IS/MND IEC/MFONSE NEPA Conduct Environmental Study Improve Airport Drainage – (Apron-Edge (5,700 LF) & Associated Outfalls) $ 225,000 $ 25,000 $ 250,000 EA N/A N/A Improve Airport Drainage – (Apron-Edge (5,700 LF) & Associated Outfalls) (Design, Engineering, and Construction) $ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 127,778 $ 1,277,778 EA IS/MND IEC/MFONSE Install Weather Reporting Equipment (AWOS III) (Design, Engineering, and Construction) $ 150,000 $ 200,000 $ 38,889 $ 388,889 CATEX CATEX NONE SUBTOTAL 2022 - 2033 (12 -Years) $ 1,846,813 $ 28,920,000 $ 506,435 $ 209,000 $ 4,048,028 $ 35,530,276

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029

LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT (TVL)
FEDERAL (90.0%)
LOCAL (10.0%)

AIP BIL (ATP)
DESCRIPTION End Date
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA - February 2024
TOTAL

ESTIMATED

PROJECT COST
2024
BIL Allocated DOLLARS

FUNDING SOURCES
Start Date
2030
2031
2032
2033

ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
State
Apportionment/ DI
1 of 1 Jviation, A Woolpert Company 672
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program G Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
APPENDIX G: FAA PAVEAIR RESULTS
673
Network Branch Section Surface Branch Use PCI FOD SCI Construction Date Inspection Date Age at Inspection Age at Time of Report State Climate Zone Area Area Unit South Lake Tahoe Rwy 18 Rwy 18 AAC RUNWAY 72 28 100 07/01/2008 09/18/2023 15 16 CALIFORNIA WF 854007 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway A Taxiway A AAC TAXIWAY 54 45 96 07/01/1990 09/18/2023 33 34 CALIFORNIA WF 447458 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway B Taxiway B AAC TAXIWAY 55 45 100 07/01/1990 09/18/2023 33 34 CALIFORNIA WF 13500 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway D Taxiway D AAC TAXIWAY 100 100 100 08/14/2023 08/14/2023 0 1 CALIFORNIA WF 5610 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway E Taxiway E AAC TAXIWAY 48 50 92 07/01/1990 09/18/2023 33 34 CALIFORNIA WF 27000 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway F East Taxiway F East AAC TAXIWAY 49 42 69 07/01/1990 09/18/2023 33 34 CALIFORNIA WF 27000 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway F West Taxiway F West AAC TAXIWAY 46 54 100 07/01/1970 09/18/2023 53 54 CALIFORNIA WF 11305 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway G Taxiway G AAC TAXIWAY 85 15 100 07/01/2016 09/18/2023 7 8 CALIFORNIA WF 6975 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway H Taxiway H AAC TAXIWAY 29 58 73 07/01/1990 09/18/2023 33 34 CALIFORNIA WF 13860 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway J Taxiway J AAC TAXIWAY 44 45 72 07/01/1990 09/18/2023 33 34 CALIFORNIA WF 13500 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Taxiway K Taxiway K AAC TAXIWAY 58 36 80 07/01/1990 09/18/2023 33 34 CALIFORNIA WF 22050 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Apron 1 Apron 1 AAC APRON 100 0 100 08/14/2023 09/18/2023 0 1 CALIFORNIA WF 111000 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Apron 2 Apron 2 AAC APRON 54 46 100 07/01/2010 09/18/2023 13 14 CALIFORNIA WF 90480 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Apron 3 Apron 3 PCC APRON 100 6 100 07/01/2009 09/18/2023 14 15 CALIFORNIA WF 81000 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Apron 4 Apron 4 AAC APRON 85 15 100 07/01/2019 09/18/2023 4 5 CALIFORNIA WF 41600 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Apron 5 Apron 5 AAC APRON 67 33 100 07/01/2016 09/18/2023 7 8 CALIFORNIA WF 198801 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Apron 6 Apron 6 AAC APRON 76 24 100 07/01/2017 09/19/2023 6 7 CALIFORNIA WF 125281 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Apron 7 Apron 7 AAC APRON 100 1 100 09/18/2019 09/19/2023 4 5 CALIFORNIA WF 52640 sfSouth Lake Tahoe Apron 8 Apron 8 AAC APRON 100 0 100 09/08/2020 09/19/2023 3 4 CALIFORNIA WF 144376 sfSouth Lake Tahoe AR01TV Airport Rd 1 AC ROADWAY 80 0 94 07/01/2009 09/20/2023 14 15 CALIFORNIA WF 69196 sfSouth Lake Tahoe ARTV02 Airport Rd 2 AC ROADWAY 78 0 87 07/01/2009 09/20/2023 14 15 CALIFORNIA WF 5751 sfSouth Lake Tahoe ARTV03 Airport Rd 3 AC ROADWAY 74 0 100 07/01/2009 09/20/2023 14 15 CALIFORNIA WF 5350 sfSouth Lake Tahoe ARTV04 Airport Rd 4 AC ROADWAY 47 0 54 07/01/2009 09/20/2023 14 15 CALIFORNIA WF 47075 sfSouth Lake Tahoe TP01TV Parking 1 AC PARKING 61 0 97 07/01/2010 09/18/2023 13 14 CALIFORNIA WF 71175 sf 674
Use
Category Total Area(ft²) Arithmetic Average PCI
APRON 845,175.00 85.25
PARKING 71,175.00 60.79
ROADWAY 127,371.60 69.81
RUNWAY 854,000.00 72.28
TAXIWAY 588,255.00 56.92
All 2,485,976.60 69.31
10 19.68 56.92
24 20.96 69.31
4 13.63 69.81
1 0.00 72.28
8 16.88 85.25
1 0.00 60.79
Number of Sections Standard Deviation PCI Weighted Average PCI

LAKE TAHOE AIPORT

BRANCH CONDITION SUMMARY REPORT
675
Age
Category
Number of
Sections
Weighted
Average PCI
[0-2] 2 100.00
[03-5] 3 97.41
[06-10] 3 70.94
[11-15] 8 71.56
[31-35] 7 53.03
Age >=50 1 46.44
All 17 2,485,976.60 24 69.31 20.96 70.97
33 564,365.00 48.19 8.93
53 11,305.00 46.44 0.00
6 331,055.00 76.23 7.42
13 1,224,026.60 70.74 15.80
0 116,610.00 100.00 0.00
3 238,615.00 95.05 7.00

LAKE TAHOE AIPORT

SECTION CONDITION SUMMARY REPORT
Average Age at
Inspection Total Area(ft²) Arithmetic Average PCI Standard Deviation PCI 676
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
APPENDIX H: PAVEMENT INSPECTION PHOTOS
677
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H1 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Runway 18/36 is a grooved asphalt surface. The 2023 PCI is 72. The largest cracks have formed longitudinally along the paving joints with transverse cracks having formed fairly evenly full length. Weathering on the runway is 100 percent.

Although the runway is in good condition major rehabilitation is recommended in the CIP.

FIGURE 1. RUNWAY 18/36
Taxiway A is in fair condition. The overview shows the sawed joints from construction. These are regarded as longitudinal and transverse cracking. There is regular secondary cracking outside the sawed joints. Weathering is 100 percent. The condition is fair and needs a surface treatment followed by rehabilitation in the near future.

FIGURE 2. TAXIWAY A
678
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H2 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Taxiway B has a significant amount of longitudinal and transverse cracks. The PCI is currently 55 and is in fair condition.

There is considerable secondary cracking that has areas that constitute block cracking. Although Taxiway B has had a seal coat installed sometime in the past it shows areas of weathering. A surface treatment followed by rehabilitation is in the CIP.

FIGURE 3. TAXIWAY B
Taxiway D pavement surface shows minor marks from snow removal equipment. It also shows no significant distress on the pavement surface and is in excellent condition. The PCI rating is currently at 100 as it has recently been resurfaced.

FIGURE 4. TAXIWAY D
679
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H3 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Taxiway E is in fair condition with a PCI of 48. The overview shows the sawed joints from construction. These are regarded as longitudinal and transverse cracking. There is secondary cracking in some areas forming block cracking. There are areas of weathering along the center line.

FIGURE 5. TAXIWAY E
Taxiway F East has longitudinal and transverse cracking with areas of weathering. The taxiway is in fair condition with a PCI of 49. This pavement has had a slurry seal in the past which is delaminating. A surface treatment is recommenced.

FIGURE 6. TAXIWAY F EAST
680
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H4 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Taxiway F West is in fair condition with a PCI of 46. It has longitudinal and transverse cracking with areas of significant weathering. Many of the cracks have secondary cracks forming block cracking and alligator cracking. A surface treatment is recommended.

FIGURE 7. TAXIWAY F WEST
Taxiway G is in excellent condition with only a couple of small cracks along paving joints. The PCI is 85.

FIGURE 8. TAXIWAY G
681
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H5 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Taxiway H is in poor condition with a PCI of 29. The overview shows the sawed joints from construction. These are regarded as longitudinal and transverse cracking. There is significant secondary cracking in some areas forming block cracking. Weathering is 100%. Taxiway H is recommended for a surface treatment and rehabilitation later.

FIGURE 9. TAXIWAY H
Taxiway J is in poor condition with a PCI of 44. The overview shows the sawed joints from construction. These are regarded as longitudinal and transverse cracking. There is secondary cracking forming large areas of block cracking.

Taxiway J is recommended for a surface treatment and rehabilitation later.

FIGURE 10. TAXIWAY J
682
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H6 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Taxiway K is in to fair to poor condition with a PCI of 58. The overview shows the sawed joints from construction. These are regarded as longitudinal and transverse cracking. In one area there is secondary cracking forming large areas of block cracking. The slurry seal is delaminating and revealing weathering.

FIGURE 11. TAXIWAY K
Apron 1 (Taxilane D and Hangar Taxilanes) is new pavement and in excellent condition with no distress. The PCI is 100.

FIGURE 12. HANGAR TAXILANES AND TAXILANE D
683
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H7 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Apron 2 is in fair condition with a PCI of 54. The apron has longitudinal cracks primarily stemming from paving joint shrinkage with some secondary and transverse cracks. Weathering is considerable.

FIGURE 13. APRON 2
Apron 3 has a PCI of 100 and has only minor distresses such as shrinkage cracks, small patches, etc. This ramp is in excellent condition.

FIGURE 14. APRON 3
684
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H8 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Apron 4 has a PCI of 85 and in very good condition. It has some longitudinal cracks along some of the paving joints.

Weathering is low severity but covers 100 percent. The surface is recommended for a surface treatment.

FIGURE 15. APRON 4
Apron 5 has a PCI of 67 and is in good condition. The apron has longitudinal cracks primarily along paving joints. There are some secondary and transverse cracks that have progressed to form small areas of block cracking. Weathering is 100 percent. A surface treatment is recommended.

FIGURE 16. APRON 5
685
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H9 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Apron 6 is in very good condition with a PCI of 76. There are longitudinal cracks primarily stemming from paving joints with some transverse cracks. Weathering is low severity but covers 100 percent.

FIGURE 17. APRON 6
Apron 7 is in excellent condition with a PCI of 100. There are a small number of cracks, and the main distress is oil spills.

A surface treatment in the future is recommended.

FIGURE 18. APRON 7
686
Pavement Maintenance-Management Program H10 Woolpert Inc.

October 31, 2024 AIP Project No. 3-06-0249-047-2022
Apron 8 has a PCI of 100 and is in excellent condition. The apron is nearly distress free. A surface treatment is recommended in the future.
.

FIGURE 19. APRON 8
The Airport Entrance Road is in good condition. The road was divided into four sections for inspection and the PCI ranges between 47 and 80. The average PCI for the entrance road is 70. There are some areas of cracking that are beginning to develop into alligator cracking. Weathering is 100 percent with a few areas of raveling.

FIGURE 20. AIRPORT ENTRANCE ROAD
687
20 ATTACHMENT 4
TVL 2026 CIP PACKAGE
688

NEPA CEQA TRPA
Rehabilitate Runway 18/36 (Crack Seal/Seal Coat/Paint) $ 150,000 $ 100,000 $ 138,158 $ 388,158 CATEX IS/ADDENDUM IEC/MFONSE 10/1/2023 12/31/2025 Reimbursement for Pavement Maintenance (Taxiway) $ 108,000 $ 49,796 $ 157,796 CATEX IS/ADDENDUM IEC/MFONSE 10/1/2023 12/31/2026 Airport Access Road Rehabilitation (7,820 SY) (mill/fill) $ 450,000 $ 450,000 NONE CATEX NONE 11/25/2024 10/15/2025 Rehabilitate Parallel Taxiway A ( 8,541’) and Electrical Infrastructure (Design & Engineering) (2023 PCI=54) $ 150,000 $ 795,000 $ 105,000 $ 1,050,000 CATEX CATEX IEC/MFONSE 5/1/2026 12/31/2027 Rehabilitate Parallel Taxiway A (50’ x 3,635’) and Electrical Infrastructure (Construction) (2023 PCI=54) $ 150,000 $ 3,630,000 $ 420,000 $ 4,200,000 CATEX CATEX IEC/MFONSE 5/1/2027 12/31/2028 Bank Entitlement Funds
Rehabilitate Parallel Taxiway A (50’ x 4,906’) and Electrical Infrastructure (Bid and Construction) (2023 PCI=54) $ 300,000 $ 5,280,000 $ 620,000 $ 6,200,000 CATEX CATEX IEC/MFONSE 5/1/2027 12/31/2028 Rehabilitate Runway 18/36 (100’ x 8,451’ (94,900 SY)) and Electrical Infrastructure (Design & Engineering) $ 150,000 $ 615,000 $ 85,000 $ 850,000 CATEX IS/ADDENDUM IEC/MFONSE 5/1/2027 12/31/2029 Rehabilitate Runway 18/36 (100’ x 8,541’ (94,900 SY)) and Electrical Infrastructure (Construction) $ 150,000 $ 14,700,000 $ 1,650,000 $ 16,500,000 CATEX IS/ADDENDUM IEC/MFONSE 5/1/2028 12/31/2029 Install Weather Reporting Equipment (AWOS III) (Design, Engineering, and Construction) $ 150,000 $ 200,000 $ 38,889 $ 388,889 CATEX CATEX NONE CEQA Conduct Environmental Study Improve Airport Drainage – (Apron-Edge (5,700 LF) & Associated Outfalls) $ - $ 550,000 $ 550,000 N/A IS/MND IEC/MFONSE NEPA Conduct Environmental Study Improve Airport Drainage – (Apron-Edge (5,700 LF) & Associated Outfalls) $ 225,000 $ 25,000 $ 250,000 EA N/A N/A Improve Airport Drainage – (Apron-Edge (5,700 LF) & Associated Outfalls) (Design, Engineering, and Construction) $ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 127,778 $ 1,277,778 EA IS/MND IEC/MFONSE SUBTOTAL 2026 - 2033 (8 -Years) $ 1,575,000 $ 26,320,000 $ 108,000 $ - $ 4,259,621 $ 32,262,621

DESCRIPTION

LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT (TVL)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA - October 2025
FEDERAL (90.0% - 95.0%)
LOCAL (5.0% -

10.0%) AIP BIL (ATP)
End Date
TOTAL

ESTIMATED

PROJECT COST
2026

DOLLARS
2035
BIL Allocated

FUNDING SOURCES
Start Date
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034

ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
State
Apportionment/ DI
2026
2027
2028
2029
1 of 1 Woolpert, Inc. 689
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: OVERALL PLAN L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:44 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA
1 REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18/36 AND

ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (DESIGN,

ENGINEERING, & CONSTRUCTION)

INSTALL
AWOS III 2026-2033 OVERALL PLAN
2028 REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (CONSTRUCTION) (TWY F TO TWY B) 2029 BANK ENTITLEMENT FUNDS
2030 REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (BID & CONSTRUCTION) (TWY F TO TWY K)
2031 REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18/36 AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (DESIGN & ENGINEEERING) 2032 REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18/36 AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (CONSTRUCTION) 2033 INSTALL WEATHER REPORTING EQUIPMENT (AWOS III) (DESIGN, ENGINEERING, & CONSTRUCTION) 2034 CEQA CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY IMPROVE AIRPORT DRAINAGE (APRON EDGE & ASSOCIATED

OUTFALLS)
2034 NEPA CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY IMPROVE AIRPORT DRAINAGE (APRON EDGE & ASSOCIATED

OUTFALLS)
2035 IMPROVE AIRPORT DRAINAGE (APRON EDGE & ASSOCIATED OUTFALLS) (DESIGN, ENGINEERING, &

CONSTRUCTION)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2026 REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18-36 (CRACK SEAL/SEAL COAT/PAINT) 2026 AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD REHABILITATION (MILL/FILL)
2026 REIMBURSEMENT FOR PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE (TAXIWAY) (NOT DEPICTED) 2027 REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (DESIGN &

ENGINEERING)

REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND

ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (BID AND

CONSTRUCTION)
REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18-36
(CRACK SEAL / SEAL COAT /
PAINT)

REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND

ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (DESIGN,

ENGINEERING, & CONSTRUCTION)

AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD

REHABILITATION

CEQA CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY

IMPROVE AIRPORT DRAINAGE (APRON EDGE
& ASSOCIATED OUTFALLS)

IMPROVE AIRPORT DRAINAGE (APRON EDGE
& ASSOCIATED OUTFALLS) (DESIGN,

ENGINEERING, & CONSTRUCTION)
690
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2026 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:46 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 3 2026

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2026 REIMBURSEMENT FOR PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE (NOT DEPICTED) 2026 REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18-36 (CRACK SEAL/SEAL COAT/PAINT) 2026 AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD REHABILITATION (MILL/FILL)
REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18-36
(CRACK SEAL / SEAL COAT /
PAINT)

AIRPORT ACCESS ROAD

REHABILITATION
691
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2027 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:47 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2027 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:47 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 4 2027-2028

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2027 REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (DESIGN & ENGINEERING)

REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A,
AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
692
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2028 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:48 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2028 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:48 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 4

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2028 REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (CONSTRUCTION) (TWY F TO TWY B ) 2027-2028

REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND

ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
693
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2029-2030 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:49 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 5 2029-2030

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2029 BANK ENTITLEMENT FUNDS
2030 REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (BID & CONSTRUCTION) (TWY F TO TWY K)

REHABILITATE PARALLEL TAXIWAY A AND

ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
694
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2031-2032 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:51 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2031-2032 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:51 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 6 2031-2032

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2031 REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18/36 AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (DESIGN & ENGINEERING) 2032 REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18/36 AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (CONSTRUCTION) REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18/36 AND

ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
695
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2033 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:52 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 7 2033INSTALL

AWOS III

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2033 INSTALL WEATHER REPORTING EQUIPMENT (AWOS III) (DESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND

CONSTRUTION
696
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2034 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:53 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2034 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:54 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 6 2031-2032

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2034 CEQA CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY IMPROVE AIRPORT DRAINAGE - (APRON EDGE &

ASSOCIATED OUTFALLS)
2034 NEPA CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY IMPROVE AIRPORT DRAINAGE - (APRON EDGE &

ASSOCIATED OUTFALLS)

STORM WATER REALIGN AND ENLARGE

AIRPORT DRAINAGE DITCH OUTFALL (STUDY,

DESIGN, ENGINEERING & CONSTRUTION)
697
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2035 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:55 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA
SHEET NO: Layout Tab Name: 2035 L:\TVL\0-TVL General\CIP\2025 CIP\TVL-CIP-2025-10.22.24.dwg Plotted By:Brooking, Laken Plotted:October 17, 2025, 11:13:55 AM Last Saved By: L.Brooking, 10/17/2025 11:12:52 AM LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026 - 2033 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 7 DATE: OCTOBER 2025 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA 6 2031-2032

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

YEAR PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2035 IMPROVE AIRPORT DRAINAGE (DESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION)

STORM WATER REALIGN AND ENLARGE

AIRPORT DRAINAGE DITCH OUTFALL (STUDY,

DESIGN, ENGINEERING & CONSTRUTION)
698

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

AIRPORT MASTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 1ST day of June 2026 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Environmental Science Associates (ESA) (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, “Scope of Services,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, “Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.
699

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for 5 years ending May 31, 2031.

3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City or Consultant immediately for cause or without cause upon thirty days (30) days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination, and City shall be entitled to all work performed to that date. 700
Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.

7. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City.

8. Consultant’s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, 701
unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City.

Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract, and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’s assigned personnel. Any third party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

10. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the 702
performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will not serve in a staff capacity and will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to their rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700.3(a)].

11. Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise.

12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out their duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.
703

13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. If Consultant will be physically present in the City of South Lake Tahoe to perform some or all of the services, Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied.

14. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any subcontractor, regardless of whether such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, 704
demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’s work under this Agreement.

15. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for their employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on
the standard Occurrence form. Claims-Made forms are not acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by on behalf of Consultant. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general
705
aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.
v. Cyber Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain cyber liability insurance with limits not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim, two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is
undertaken by Vendor in this agreement and shall include, but not limited to, claims involving security breach; system failure; data recovery; business interruption; cyber extortion; social engineering; infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines and penalties, and credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations. Vendor’s policy shall be primary and shall not seek contribution from the City’s coverage, shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, and shall be 706
endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are additional
insureds. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policy by Vendor shall not affect coverage provided to the City. If Vendor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums listed above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Vendor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a AM Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional
insured’s under Consultant’s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/or work performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each,
except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
707
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’s insurance policies.

The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.

Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
708
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant: Patrick Hickman, AICP, PLA
Project Manager
Environmental Science Associates
2600 Capitol Avenue Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95816
(619)719-4224
[email protected]

17. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

18. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

19. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1094.5, and as provided by law.

20. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.
709

21. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent contractors hired in accordance with Consultant’s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid, nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent contractor hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

22. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer, and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for employment because of ancestry, age, color, disability, genetic information, gender expression, gender identity, marital status, medical condition, military or veteran status, national origin, race, religion, reproductive health decision making, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination.

23. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8355, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(a)(2) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
710
ii. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a)(3), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

24. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

25. Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures that neither it nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

26. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.
711

27. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

28. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

29. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

30. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

31. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

32. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.

33. Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to Ensure Equal Employment Opportunity.
a. The Offeror’s or Bidder’s attention is called to the “Equal Opportunity Clause” and the “Standard Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Construction Contract Specifications” set forth herein. 712
b. The goals and timetables for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Consultant’s aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Timetables
Goals for minority participation for each trade: 0.0% Race Conscious Goals for female participation in each trade: 0.0%
These goals are applicable to all of the Consultant’s construction work (whether or not it is Federal or federally assisted) performed in the covered area. If the Consultant performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, it shall apply the goals established for such geographical area where the work is actually performed. With regard to this second area, the Consultant also is subject to the goals for both its federally involved and nonfederally involved construction. The Consultant’s compliance with the Executive Order and the regulations in 41 CFR Part 60-4 shall be based on its implementation of the Equal Opportunity Clause, specific affirmative action obligations required by the specifications set forth in 41 CFR 60-4.3(a) and its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade, and the Consultant shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Consultant to Consultant or from project to project for the sole purpose of meeting the Consultant’s goals shall be a violation of the contract, the Executive Order and the regulations in 41 CFR Part 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.
a. The Consultant shall provide written notification to the Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP)within 10 working days of award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the name, address, and telephone number of the Sub-Consultant; employer identification number of the Sub-Consultant; estimated dollar amount of the subcontract; estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and the geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.
713
b. As used in this notice and in the contract resulting from this solicitation, the “covered area” is the City of South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado County, California.

34. Breach of Contract Terms. Any violation or breach of terms of this contract on the part of the Consultant or its Sub-Consultant may result in the suspension or termination of this contract or such other action that may be necessary to enforce the rights of the parties of this agreement. Owner will provide Consultant written notice that describes the nature of the breach and corrective actions the Consultant must undertake in order to avoid termination of the contract. Owner reserves the right to withhold payments to Consultant until such time the Consultant corrects the breach or the Owner elects to terminate the contract. The Owner’s notice will identify a specific date by which the Consultant must correct the breach. Owner may proceed with termination of the contract if the Consultant fails to correct the breach by the deadline indicated in the Owner’s notice. The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents and the rights and remedies available thereunder are in addition to, and not a limitation of, any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law.

35. General Civil Rights Provisions. The Consultant agrees to comply with pertinent statutes, Executive Orders and such rules as are promulgated to ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or benefiting from Federal assistance. This provision binds the Consultant and Sub-Consultant from the bid solicitation period through the completion of the contract. This provision is in addition to that required by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

36. Title VI Solicitation Notice. The City of South Lake Tahoe, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 USC §§2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders or offerors that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, [select disadvantaged business enterprises or airport concession disadvantaged business enterprises] will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will 714
not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin inconsideration for an award.

37. Compliance with Nondiscrimination Requirements. During the performance of this contract, the Consultant, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”), agrees as follows:
a. Compliance with Regulations: The Consultant (hereinafter includes consultants) will comply with the Title VI List of Pertinent Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities, as they may be amended from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract
b. Nondiscrimination: The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of Sub-Consultant, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The Consultant will not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR part 21.
c. Solicitations for Subcontracts, including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Consultant for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential Sub-Consultant or supplier will be notified by the Consultant of the Consultant’s obligations under this contract and the Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.
d. Information and Reports: The Consultant will provide all information and reports required by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto and will permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Nondiscrimination Acts and Authorities and instructions. Where any information required of a Consultant is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or 715
refuses to furnish the information, the Consultant will so certify to the sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration, as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. e. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a Consultant’s noncompliance with the non-discrimination provisions of this contract, the sponsor will impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Aviation Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
i. Withholding payments to the Consultant under the
contract until the Consultant complies; and/or
ii. Cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part.
f. Incorporation of Provisions: The Consultant will include the provisions of paragraphs one through six in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto.

The Consultant will take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation by a SubConsultant, or supplier because of such direction, the Consultant may request the sponsor to enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the sponsor. In addition, the Consultant may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

38. Clean Air and Water Pollution Control. Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders, and regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 USC § 740-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 USC § 1251-1387). The Consultant agrees to report any violation to the Owner immediately upon discovery. The Owner assumes responsibility for notifying the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Aviation Administration. Consultant must include this requirement in all subcontracts that exceeds $150,000.

39. Contract Workhours and Safety Standards Act Requirements. a. Overtime Requirements. No Consultant or Sub-Consultant contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such 716
laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek.
b. Violation; Liability for Unpaid Wages; Liquidated Damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause, the Consultant and any Sub-Consultant responsible therefore shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such Consultant and Sub-Consultant shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause, in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (1) of this clause.
c. Withholding for Unpaid Wages and Liquidated Damages. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or the Owner shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the Consultant or Sub-Consultant under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime Consultant, or any other federally assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the same prime Consultant, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such Consultant or Sub-Consultant for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (2) of this clause.
d. Sub-Consultant. The Consultant or Sub-Consultant shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) and also a clause requiring the Sub-Consultant to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime Consultant shall be responsible for compliance by any Sub-Consultant or lower tier Sub-Consultant with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this clause.

40. Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act. Consultant must comply with the requirements of the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (18 USC 874 and 40 717
USC3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulation 29 CFR part 3.

Consultant and Sub-Consultant are prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed on the project to give up any part of the compensation to which the employee is entitled. The Consultant and each Sub-Consultant must submit to the Owner, a weekly statement on the wages paid to each employee performing on covered work during the prior week. Owner must report any violations of the Act to the Federal Aviation Administration.

41. Davis-Bacon Act.
a. Minimum wages.
i. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR Part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fid fringe benefits (or cash equivalent thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage
determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the
Consultant and such laborers and mechanics. Contributions made or costs reasonably anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits under section 1(b)(2) of the Davis-Bacon Act on behalf of laborers or mechanics are considered wages paid to such laborers or mechanics, subject to the provisions of paragraph (42)(d) of this section; also, regular contributions made or costs incurred for more than a weekly period (but not less often than quarterly) under plans, funds, or programs which cover the particular weekly period, are deemed to be constructively made or incurred during such weekly period.

Such laborers and mechanics shall be paid the appropriate wage rate and fringe benefits on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed, without regard to skill, except as provided in 29 CFR Part 5.5(a)(4). Laborers or mechanics performing work in more than one classification may be compensated at the rate specified for each
classification for the time actually worked therein: Provided that the employer’s payroll records accurately set forth the 718
time spent in each classification in which work is performed.

The wage determination (including any additional
classification and wage rates conformed under (42)(b) of this section) and the Davis-Bacon poster (WH- 1321) shall be posted at all times by the Consultant and its Sub-Consultant at the site of the work in a prominent and accessible place where it can easily be seen by the workers.
ii. The contracting officer shall require that any class of laborers or mechanics, including helpers, which is not listed in the wage determination and which is to be employed under the
contract shall be classified in conformance with the wage determination. The contracting officer shall approve an additional classification and wage rate and fringe benefits therefore only when the following criteria have been met:

1. The work to be performed by the classification
requested is not performed by a classification in the
wage determination;

2. The classification is utilized in the area by the
construction industry; and

3. The proposed wage rate, including any bona fide
fringe benefits, bears a reasonable relationship to the wage rates contained in the wage determination.
iii. If the Consultant and the laborers and mechanics to be employed in the classification (if known), or their
representatives, and the contracting officer agree on the classification and wage rate (including the amount
designated for fringe benefits where appropriate), a report of the action taken shall be sent by the contracting officer to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, Employment Standards Administration, U.S. Department of Labor,
Washington, DC 20210. The Administrator, or an authorized representative, will approve, modify, or disapprove every additional classification action within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30-day period that additional time is necessary.
iv. In the event the Consultant, the laborers, or mechanics to be employed in the classification, or their representatives, and the 719
contracting officer do not agree on the proposed
classification and wage rate (including the amount
designated for fringe benefits where appropriate), the
contracting officer shall refer the questions, including the views of all interested parties and the recommendation of the contracting officer, to the Administrator for determination. The Administrator, or an authorized representative, will issue a determination within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting officer within the 30-day period that additional time is necessary.
v. The wage rate (including fringe benefits where appropriate) determined pursuant to subparagraphs (42)(ii) (1) or (2) of this paragraph, shall be paid to all workers performing work in the classification under this contract from the first day on which work is performed in the classification.
vi. Whenever the minimum wage rate prescribed in the contract for a class of laborers or mechanics includes a fringe benefit which is not expressed as an hourly rate, the Consultant shall either pay the benefit as stated in the wage determination or shall pay another bona fide fringe benefit or an hourly cash equivalent thereof.
vii. If the Consultant does not make payments to a trustee or other third person, the Consultant may consider as part of the wages of any laborer or mechanic the amount of any costs
reasonably anticipated in providing bona fide fringe benefits under a plan or program: Provided that the Secretary of Labor has found, upon the written request of the Consultant, that the applicable standards of the Davis-Bacon Act have been met.

The Secretary of Labor may require the Consultant to set aside in a separate account assets for the meeting of obligations under the plan or program.
b. Withholding. The Federal Aviation Administration or the sponsor shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld from the Consultant under this contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime Consultant, or any other federallyassisted contract subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements, which is held by the same prime Consultant, so much 720
of the accrued payments or advances as may be considered necessary to pay laborers and mechanics, including apprentices, trainees, and helpers, employed by the Consultant or any SubConsultant the full amount of wages required by the contract. In the event of failure to pay any laborer or mechanic, including any apprentice, trainee, or helper, employed or working on the site of work, all or part of the wages required by the contract, the Federal Aviation Administration may, after written notice to the Consultant, Sponsor, Applicant, or Owner, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds until such violations have ceased. c. Payrolls and Basic Records.
i. Payrolls and basic records relating thereto shall be maintained by the Consultant during the course of the work and preserved for a period of three years thereafter for all laborers and mechanics working at the site of the work. Such records shall contain the name, address, and social security number of each such worker; his or her correct classification; hourly rates of wages paid (including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof of the types described in 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act); daily and weekly number of hours worked; deductions made; and actual wages paid. Whenever the Secretary of
Labor has found under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(iv) that the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing benefits under a plan or program described in section 1(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-Bacon Act, the Consultant shall maintain records that show that the commitment to provide such benefits is enforceable, that the plan or program is financially responsible, and that the plan or program has been communicated in writing to the laborers or mechanics affected, and that show the costs anticipated or the actual costs incurred in providing such benefits.

Consultants employing apprentices or trainees under
approved programs shall maintain written evidence of the registration of apprenticeship programs and certification of trainee programs, the registration of the apprentices and 721
trainees, and the ratios and wage rates prescribed in the applicable programs.
ii. A. The Consultant shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the Federal Aviation Administration if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the Consultant will submit the payrolls to the applicant, Sponsor, or Owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the Federal Aviation Administration. The payrolls submitted shall set out accurately and completely all of the information required to be
maintained under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(i), except that full social security numbers and home addresses shall not be included on weekly transmittals. Instead the payrolls shall only need to include an individually identifying number for each employee (e.g. the last four digits of the employee’s social security number). The required weekly payroll information may be submitted in any form desired. Optional Form WH–347 is
available for this purpose from the Wage and Hour Division Web site at www.dol.gov/whd/forms/wh347instr.htm or its successor site. The prime Consultant is responsible for the submission of copies of payrolls by all Sub-Consultant.

Consultants and Sub-Consultant shall maintain the full social security number and current address of each covered worker and shall provide them upon request to the Federal Aviation Administration if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the Consultant will submit them to the applicant, sponsor, or Owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the Federal Aviation Administration, the Consultant, or the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor for purposes of an investigation or audit of
compliance with prevailing wage requirements. It is not a violation of this section for a prime Consultant to require a SubConsultant to provide addresses and social security numbers to the prime Consultant for its own records, without weekly submission to the sponsoring government agency (or the
applicant, Sponsor, or Owner).

B. Each payroll submitted shall be accompanied by a
"Statement of Compliance," signed by the Consultant or Sub722 Consultant or his or her agent who pays or supervises the payment of the persons employed under the contract and
shall certify the following:

1. The payroll for the payroll period contains the information required to be provided under 29 CFR § 5.5(a)(3)(ii), the appropriate information is being maintained under 29 CFR §

5.5 (a)(3)(i), and that such information is correct and complete;

2. Each laborer and mechanic (including each helper,
apprentice, and trainee) employed on the contract during the payroll period has been paid the full weekly wages earned, without rebate, either directly or indirectly, and that no deductions have been made either directly or indirectly from the full wages earned, other than permissible deductions as set forth in Regulations 29 CFR Part 3; 3.Each laborer or mechanic has been paid not less than the applicable wage rates and fringe benefits or cash equivalents for the classification of work performed, as specified in the applicable wage determination incorporated into the contract.
iii. The weekly submission of a properly executed certification set forth on the reverse side of Optional Form WH-347 shall satisfy the requirement for submission of the “Statement of
Compliance” required by paragraph (3)(ii)(B) of this section. iv. The falsification of any of the above certifications may subject the Consultant or Sub-Consultant to civil or criminal prosecution under Section 1001 of Title 18 and Section 231 of Title 31 of the United States Code.
v. The Consultant or Sub-Consultant shall make the records required under paragraph (3)(i) of this section available for inspection, copying, or transcription by authorized
representatives of the sponsor, the Federal Aviation
Administration, or the Department of Labor and shall permit such representatives to interview employees during working hours on the job. If the Consultant or Sub-Consultant fails to submit the required records or to make them available, the Federal agency may, after written notice to the Consultant, Sponsor, applicant, or Owner, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, 723
advance, or guarantee of funds. Furthermore, failure to submit the required records upon request or to make such records available may be grounds for debarment action pursuant to 29 CFR 5.12.
d. Apprentices and Trainees.
i. Apprentices. Apprentices will be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work they performed when they are employed pursuant to and individually
registered in a bona fide apprenticeship program
registered with the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Bureau of Apprenticeship
and Training, or with a State Apprenticeship Agency
recognized by the Bureau, or if a person is employed in his or her first 90 days of probationary employment as an
apprentice in such an apprenticeship program, who is not individually registered in the program, but who has been certified by the Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training or a State Apprenticeship Agency (where appropriate) to
be eligible for probationary employment as an
apprentice. The allowable ratio of apprentices to
journeymen on the job site in any craft classification shall not be greater than the ratio permitted to the Consultant as to the entire work force under the registered program.

Any worker listed on a payroll at an apprentice wage rate, who is not registered or otherwise employed as stated
above, shall be paid not less than the applicable wage
rate on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed. In addition, any apprentice
performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio
permitted under the registered program shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage
determination for the work actually performed. Where a
Consultant is performing construction on a project in a locality other than that in which its program is registered, the ratios and wage rates (expressed in percentages of
the journeyman’s hourly rate) specified in the Consultant’s or Sub-Consultant’s registered program shall be observed.

Every apprentice must be paid at not less than the rate 724
specified in the registered program for the apprentice’s level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the
journeymen hourly rate specified in the applicable wage determination. Apprentices shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the apprenticeship
program. If the apprenticeship program does not specify fringe benefits, apprentices must be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination for the applicable classification. If the Administrator determines that a different practice prevails for the applicable
apprentice classification, fringes shall be paid in
accordance with that determination. In the event the
Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training, or a State
Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Bureau,
withdraws approval of an apprenticeship program, the
Consultant will no longer be permitted to utilize
apprentices at less than the applicable predetermined
rate for the work performed until an acceptable program is approved.
ii. Trainees. Except as provided in 29 CFR 5.16, trainees will not be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work performed unless they are employed
pursuant to and individually registered in a program which has received prior approval, evidenced by formal
certification by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training Administration. The ratio of
trainees to journeymen on the job site shall not be greater than permitted under the plan approved by the
Employment and Training Administration.

Every trainee must be paid at not less than the rate
specified in the approved program for the trainee’s level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the
journeyman hourly rate specified in the applicable wage determination. Trainees shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the trainee program. If the trainee program does not mention fringe benefits,
trainees shall be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination unless the Administrator 725
of the Wage and Hour Division determines that there is an apprenticeship program associated with the
corresponding journeyman wage rate on the wage
determination that provides for less than full fringe benefits for apprentices. Any employee listed on the payroll at a trainee rate that is not registered and participating in a training plan approved by the Employment and Training
Administration shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the
classification of work actually performed. In addition, any trainee performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be
paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the work actually performed. In the
event the Employment and Training Administration
withdraws approval of a training program, the Consultant will no longer be permitted to utilize trainees at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work
performed until an acceptable program is approved.
e. Equal Employment Opportunity. The utilization of apprentices, trainees, and journeymen under this part shall be in conformity with the equal employment opportunity requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended, and 29 CFR Part 30.
f. Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements. The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of 29 CFR Part 3, which are incorporated by reference in this contract.
g. Subcontracts. The Consultant or Sub-Consultant shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses contained in 29 CFR Part 5.5(a)(1) through (10) and such other clauses as the Federal Aviation Administration may by appropriate instructions require, and also a clause requiring the Sub-Consultant to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime Consultant shall be responsible for the compliance by any Sub-Consultant or lower tier Sub-Consultant with all the contract clauses in 29 CFR Part 5.5.
h. Contract Termination: Debarment. A breach of the contract clauses in paragraph 1 through 10 of this section may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment as a Consultant and a Sub-Consultant as provided in 29 CFR 5.12.
726
i. Compliance with Davis-Bacon and Related Act Requirements. All rulings and interpretations of the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts contained in 29 CFR Parts 1, 3, and 5 are herein incorporated by reference in this contract.
j. Disputes Concerning Labor Standards. Disputes arising out of the labor standards provisions of this contract shall not be subject to the general disputes clause of this contract. Such disputes shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures of the Department of Labor set forth in 29 CFR Parts 5, 6, and 7. Disputes within the meaning of this clause include disputes between the Consultant (or any of its Sub-Consultant) and the contracting agency, the U.S. Department of Labor, or the employees or their representatives.
k. Certification of Eligibility.
i. By entering into this contract, the Consultant certifies that neither it (nor he or she) nor any person or firm who has an interest in the Consultant’s firm is a person or firm ineligible to be awarded Government contracts by virtue of section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1).
ii. No part of this contract shall be subcontracted to any person or firm ineligible for award of a Government
contract by virtue of section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1).
iii. The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in the U.S. Criminal Code, 18 USC 1001.

42. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. The Consultant or Sub-Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The Consultant shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the award and administration of Department of Transportation-assisted contracts. Failure by the Consultant to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the Owner deems appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to:
a. Withholding monthly progress payments;
b. Assessing sanctions;
c. Liquidated damages; and/or
d. Disqualifying the Consultant from future bidding as non-responsible. 727
The Prime Consultant agrees to pay each Sub-Consultant under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than sixty (60) days from the receipt of each payment the prime Consultant receives from the City of South Lake Tahoe. The prime Consultant agrees further to return retainage payments to each SubConsultant within sixty (60) days after the Sub-Consultant’s work is satisfactorily completed. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval of the City of South Lake Tahoe. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE Sub-Consultant.

43. Texting When Driving. In accordance with Executive Order 13513, “Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving”, (10/1/2009) and DOT Order 3902.10, “Text Messaging While Driving”, (12/30/2009), the Federal Aviation Administration encourages recipients of Federal grant funds to adopt and enforce safety policies that decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies to ban text messaging while driving when performing work related to a grant or subgrant. In support of this initiative, the Owner encourages the Consultant to promote policies and initiatives for its employees and other work personnel that decrease crashes by distracted drivers, including policies that ban text messaging while driving motor vehicles while performing work activities associated with the project. The Consultant must include the substance of this clause in all sub-tier contracts exceeding $3,500 that involve driving a motor vehicle in performance of work activities associated with the project.

44. Energy Conservation Requirements. Consultant and Sub-Consultant agree to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency as contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 USC 6201et seq).

45. Equal Opportunity Clause. During the performance of this contract, the Consultant agrees as follows:
a. The Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identify, or national origin. Such action 728
shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff, or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. b. The Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive considerations for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. c. The Consultant will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers’ representatives of the Consultant’s commitments under this section and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
d. The Consultant will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
e. The Consultant will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
f. In the event of the Consultant’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other 729
sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. g. The Consultant will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each SubConsultant or vendor. The Consultant will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event a Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a Sub-Consultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency the Consultant may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

46. Fair Labor Standards Act. All contracts and subcontracts that result from this solicitation incorporate by reference the provisions of 29 CFR part 201, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), with the same force and effect as if given in full text. The FLSA sets minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards for full and part-time workers. The Consultant has full responsibility to monitor compliance to the referenced statute or regulation. The Consultant must address any claims or disputes that arise from this requirement directly with the U.S. Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division.

47. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. All contracts and subcontracts that result from this solicitation incorporate by reference the requirements of 29 CFR Part 1910 with the same force and effect as if given in full text. The employer must provide a work environment that is free from recognized hazards that may cause death or serious physical harm to the employee. The employer retains full responsibility to monitor its compliance and their Sub-Consultant’s compliance with the applicable requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (20 CFR Part 1910). The employer must address any claims or disputes that pertain to a referenced 730
requirement directly with the U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

48.Prohibition of Segregated Facilities.
a. The Consultant agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location under its control where segregated facilities are maintained. The Consultant agrees that a breach of this clause is a violation of the Equal Employment Opportunity clause in this contract. b. “Segregated facilities,” as used in this clause, means any waiting rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees that are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin because of written or oral policies or employee custom. The term does not include separate or single-user rest rooms or necessary dressing or sleeping areas provided to assure privacy between the sexes.
c. The Consultant shall include this clause in every subcontract and purchase order that is subject to the Equal Employment Opportunity clause of this contract.

49. Procurement of Recovered Materials. Consultant and Sub-Consultant agree to comply with Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the regulatory provisions of 40 CFR Part 247. In the performance of this contract and to the extent practicable, the Consultant and SubConsultants are to use products containing the highest percentage of recovered materials for items designated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under 40 CFR Part 247 whenever:
a. The contract requires procurement of $10,000 or more of a designated item during the fiscal year; or
b. The Consultant has procured $10,000 or more of a designated item using Federal funding during the previous fiscal year.

The list of EPA-designated items is available at:
www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guidelines-constructionproducts. 731
Section 6002(c) establishes exceptions to the preference for recovery of EPAdesignated products if the Consultant can demonstrate the item is:
a. Not reasonably available within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule;
b. Fails to meet reasonable contract performance requirements; c. Is only available at an unreasonable price.

50. Rights to Inventions. Contracts or agreements that include the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work must provide for the rights of the Federal Government and the Owner in any resulting invention as established by 37 CFR part 401, Rights to Inventions Made by Non-profit Organizations and Small Business Firms under Government Grants, Contracts, and Cooperative Agreements. This contract incorporates by reference the patent and inventions rights as specified within 37 CFR §401.14. Consultant must include this requirement in all sub-tier contracts involving experimental, developmental, or research work.

51. Seismic Safety. In the performance of design services, the Consultant agrees to furnish a building design and associated construction specification that conform to a building code standard that provides a level of seismic safety substantially equivalent to standards as established by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). Local building codes that model their building code after the current version of the International Building Code (IBC) meet the NEHRP equivalency level for seismic safety. At the conclusion of the design services, the Consultant agrees to furnish the Owner a “certification of compliance” that attests conformance of the building design and the construction specifications with the seismic standards of NEHRP or an equivalent building code.

52. Termination for Convenience. The Owner may, by written notice to the Consultant, terminate this Agreement for its convenience and without cause or default on the part of Consultant. Upon receipt of the notice of termination, except as explicitly directed by the Owner, the Contractor must immediately discontinue all services affected. Upon termination of the Agreement, the Consultant must deliver to the Owner all data, surveys, models, drawings, specifications, reports, maps, photographs, estimates, summaries, and other documents and materials prepared by the Engineer under this contract, whether complete or partially complete. Owner agrees to make just and equitable compensation to the Consultant for satisfactory 732
work completed up through the date the Consultant receives the termination notice. Compensation will not include anticipated profit on nonperformed services. Owner further agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

53. Termination for Cause. Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause if the other party fails to fulfill its obligations that are essential to the completion of the work per the terms and conditions of the Agreement. The party initiating the termination action must allow the breaching party an opportunity to dispute or cure the breach. The terminating party must provide the breaching party seven (7) days advance written notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement. The notice must specify the nature and extent of the breach, the conditions necessary to cure the breach, and the effective date of the termination action. The rights and remedies in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this agreement.
a. Termination by Owner: The Owner may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part, for the failure of the Consultant to:
i. Perform the services within the time specified in this contract or by Owner approved extension;
ii. Make adequate progress so as to endanger satisfactory performance of the Project; or
iii. Fulfill the obligations of the Agreement that are essential to the completion of the Project.

Upon receipt of the notice of termination, the Consultant must immediately discontinue all services affected unless the notice directs otherwise. Upon termination of the Agreement, the Consultant must deliver to the Owner all data, surveys, models, drawings, specifications, reports, maps, photographs, estimates, summaries, and other documents and materials prepared by the Engineer under this contract, whether complete or partially complete. Owner agrees to make just and equitable compensation to the Consultant for satisfactory work completed up through the date the Consultant receives the termination notice. Compensation will not include anticipated profit on nonperformed services. Owner further agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause. If, after finalization of the termination action, the Owner determines the Consultant was not in default of the 733
Agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the Owner issued the termination for the convenience of the Owner. b. Termination by Consultant. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part, if the Owner:
i. Defaults on its obligations under this Agreement;
ii. Fails to make payment to the Consultant in accordance with the terms of this Agreement;
iii. Suspends the Project for more than one hundred and eighty (180) days due to reasons beyond the control of the Consultant.

Upon receipt of a notice of termination from the Consultant, Owner agrees to cooperate with Consultant for the purpose of terminating the agreement or portion thereof, by mutual consent. If Owner and Consultant cannot reach mutual agreement on the termination settlement, the Consultant may, without prejudice to any rights and remedies it may have, proceed with terminating all or parts of this Agreement based upon the Owner’s breach of the contract. In the event of termination due to Owner breach, the Engineer is entitled to invoice Owner and to receive full payment for all services performed or furnished in accordance with this Agreement and all justified reimbursable expenses incurred by the Consultant through the effective date of termination action. Owner agrees to hold Consultant harmless for errors or omissions in documents that are incomplete as a result of the termination action under this clause.

54. Veterans Preference. In the employment of labor (excluding executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), the Contractor and all sub-tier contractors must give preference to covered veterans as defined within Title 49 United States Code Section 47112. Covered veterans include Vietnam-era veterans, Persian Gulf veterans, Afghanistan-Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business concerns (as defined by 15 USC 632) owned and controlled by disabled veterans. This preference only applies when there are covered veterans readily available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates.

55. Time Overruns Beyond Control of Consultant. On airport architectural/engineering construction contract amendments to the Master Professional Services Agreement, the Consultant must provide the City with amendment language that states the period of time as specified by the number of contract days for which the compensation applies. The consultant must be reimbursed for services in excess of the specified 734
period of time at a mutually acceptable fee negotiated at the time all the pertinent circumstances are known. The cost of additional consultant technical inspection services that would result from Construction Contractor or City caused construction delays should be included in the liquidated damages established for Airport Improvement Program (AIP) construction contracts.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CONSULTANT:

By ________________________________
Patrick Hickman, Project Manager
Date _____________________________
Business License # ___________________
Date ________________________________
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE:

By___________________________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Date __________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date ________________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C – Anti-Lobbying Certification
Exhibit D – Trade Restriction Certification
Exhibit E – Tax Delinquency and Felony Conviction Certification Exhibit F – Certification of Offerer/Bidder Regarding Debarment Exhibit G – W9
Exhibit H – COI
008716
735

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
736
City of South Lake Tahoe
5-Year Master Professional
Services Contract for Lake Tahoe
Airport (TVL) 2026-2031
Airport Environmental Compliance Support Services (NEPA, CEQA, & TRPA) March 26, 2026
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
737
Table of Contents

SECTION A
Cover Letter��1

SECTION B
Previous California Work ��3

SECTION C
Company History, Background and Experience��8

SECTION D
Scope of Work - Qualifications��19

SECTION E
Financial Responsibility��23

SECTION F
Description of Recent Projects-References�� 25

APPENDIX A
Resumes
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
i
738
March 26, 2026
Attn: John Dickinson, C.M.

Airport Manager
Lake Tahoe Airport
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 100
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Subject: 5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 Airport Environmental Compliance Support Services (NEPA, CEQA, & TRPA) Dear Mr. Dickinson:

The City of South Lake Tahoe seeks support services for environmental compliance related to airport operations and capital improvement projects at Lake Tahoe Airport (Airport). This includes preparation of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) environmental documentation, as well as coordination with local and regional stakeholders. Environmental Science Associates (ESA) has experience at more than 250 airports nationally, including 50 in California, and we are currently providing similar on-call services for more than 80 airports throughout the United States. We are the premier environmental based aviation consultancy with a dedicated team of airport specialists providing air quality, noise studies, NEPA/CEQA/State Environmental Policy Act, natural resources permitting and mitigation, wildlife hazards, sustainability and resilience, and community engagement among other services. ESA has assembled a comprehensive team of experienced, highly skilled professionals with the expertise necessary to meet all of the Airport’s needs under this contract. The ESA Team can provide Lake Tahoe Airport with Industry-leading environmental expertise, local experience and presence, and a solid understanding of the Airport and surrounding area.

Environmental Expertise: As a firm, ESA has more than 50 years of experience conducting CEQA and NEPA compliance and managing and preparing documentation for a wide range of projects throughout California. ESA also has extensive experience managing and preparing environmental documents for TRPA compliance, in accordance with the TRPA Code of Ordinances. Our extensive experience includes successfully preparing environmental documentation for airport and airport-related projects throughout the United States. In California, ESA recently completed work with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on preparation of the NEPA/CEQA documentation for the Runway Safety Area Improvements Project at Bishop Airport in Inyo County, and we also recently completed the NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA) for the WattEV electric vehicle charging facility on land owned by Sacramento International Airport.

We are also managing CEQA documentation for several projects at San Francisco International Airport. ESA’s work was featured at the FAA’s 2024 Western Pacific Airports Conference, where FAA regional and legal staff presented ESA’s EA for a new Cargo Logistics Center at San Bernardino International as a “best practice” example for completing NEPA on airport projects. These represent just a few examples of our recent work in California on airport and airport-related projects.

Local Experience & Presence: The ESA Team has managed or collaborated on numerous projects at Lake Tahoe Airport and in the Lake Tahoe region. ESA, Woolpert, and Wildscape Engineering teamed on the last 5-Year Master Professional Services contract for the Airport. ESA also completed the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for Lake Tahoe Airport and the associated CEQA documentation. This required an understanding of the land use regulatory environment in the Lake Tahoe region. The ESA Team also has extensive experience in coordinating with TRPA as well as other interested parties in the region, such as the California Tahoe Conservancy. Some of the projects

SECTION A
Cover Letter
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
1 2600 Capitol Avenue
Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95816
415.896.5900 phone
415.896.0332 fax
esassoc.com
739
our team members have worked on with TRPA include the Tahoe Keys Lagoon EIR/EIS, Upper Truckee River and Marsh and Lower West Side Wetland Restoration Project; the Sierra District, Upper Truckee River Restoration and Golf Course Relocation Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Revegetation Design for South Lake Tahoe Public Utilities District Comprehensive Facility-Wide Erosion Control Project. The ESA Team also has an enduring local presence, with several of our team members living in the Lake Tahoe area.

Location Understanding & Relationships: Through our many years of working on airport and airspace projects, ESA has developed a highly productive working relationship with the FAA. We have worked collaboratively with environmental protection specialists (EPSs) in both the Airports and Air Traffic Organizations and have good working relationships with EPSs in both the San Francisco and Los Angeles Airports’ district offices. Our staff include multiple former FAA EPSs as well as headquarters staff from the FAA’s Office of Environment. This provides us with unique insight into the agency’s expectations and results in thorough NEPA documentation that is so critical to ensuring that approvals are secured in a timely manner. We have also successfully navigated numerous projects through environmental review process with the TRPA and understand that close collaboration and communication with this regional agency is absolutely key to the successful implementation of projects in the Lake Tahoe Basin.

Our Project Team will be led by Patrick Hickman, supported by Project Director Eryn Brennan and Deputy Project Manager Steve Smith. Combined, they bring more than 60 years of experience in CEQA/NEPA environmental documentation, as well as experience with aviation and aviation-related projects. Our team’s history with the Lake Tahoe Airport and familiarity with the unique regulatory environment in the Lake Tahoe region, as well as our decades of environmental documentation experience, will enable us to quickly and efficiently mobilize to provide you with immediate support.

The information provided in this statement of qualifications will illustrate how the ESA Team would excel in providing you with unparalleled environmental compliance support services. The enclosed proposal will remain valid for a period of no less than 120 days from the date of submittal. We very much look forward to the opportunity to continue working with you. Please feel free to contact Patrick with any questions at [email protected] or at (619) 719-4224.

Sincerely,
Michael Arnold Eryn Brennan Patrick Hickman
Market Leader Project Director Project Manager
Cover Letter page 2
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
2 740

SECTION B
Previous California Work
Introduction
This section describes Environmental Science
Associates’ (ESA’s) experience providing environmental
consulting services for projects located within California.

The projects listed below demonstrate ESA’s ability
to navigate projects through complex environmental
review processes with agencies like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Tahoe Regional Planning
Agency (TRPA).

On-Call Experience
ESA has experience at more than 250 airports nationally, including 50 in California, and we are currently providing similar on-call services for more than 80 airports
throughout California and the United States. Our
team brings an interdisciplinary approach to resolving
environmental issues specific to airport projects and
devising practical solutions for projects ranging from
small and straightforward to large and complex. Our
deep bench of knowledgeable professionals allows our
project managers to address urgent client questions
and unexpected issues reliably and effectively. Our
expertise, professionalism, and responsiveness with oncall contracts is reflected by the fact that more than 85 percent of our airport business comes from existing and prior clients.

Local and Regional
Experience
With more than 500 environmental professionals
located in California, we are experts in navigating
California’s complex state, regional, and local regulatory environment. We have excellent working relationships
with agencies at all levels and with Native American
tribes, which allows us to effectively guide our clients’ project implementation strategy. The ESA Team has
managed or collaborated on numerous projects at Lake
Tahoe Airport (Airport) and in the Lake Tahoe region.

ESA’s recent work at Lake Tahoe Airport extends back
to 2016 and includes environmental review for Airport
Master Plan updates, an airport land use compatibility
plan update, and land use advisory services. All this
work has contributed to ESA’s familiarity with the Airport and the particular regulatory framework in which it
operates. Within the greater Lake Tahoe region, ESA
has extensive experience in coordinating with TRPA as
well as other regional interests, such as the California Tahoe Conservancy. Projects ESA has contributed to
in the region include Upper Truckee River and Marsh
and Lower West Side Wetland Restoration Project;
the Sierra District, Upper Truckee River Restoration
and Golf Course Relocation Project Environmental
Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS); Cultivating Community, Conserving the Basin:

Tahoe Living Housing Policy Amendments and the
Revegetation Design for South Lake Tahoe Public
Utilities District Comprehensive Facility-Wide Erosion
Control Project. ESA’s knowledge of the region’s
planning environment, coupled with our experience
providing on-call services at airports throughout the
state, gives us unparalleled expertise essential to the successful delivery of high-quality, technically accurate environmental services.

Relevant Projects
Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan
CEQA/TRPA Documentation
Client: City of South Lake Tahoe
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA
Duration: 2025–2026
Scope/Role: ESA has provided on-call environmental
compliance and related technical environmental services for Lake Tahoe Airport, supporting both ongoing airport 5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
3 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
741
operations and airport capital improvement activities
in a complex, multi-layered regulatory setting within
the Lake Tahoe Basin. ESA is currently assisting the
City of South Lake Tahoe (City) in the environmental
review for the Draft Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan.

Lake Tahoe Airport has developed an Airport Master
Plan addressing anticipated long-term facility and
infrastructure needs. The Airport Master Plan will guide development at the Airport for the foreseeable future
and allow for appropriate accommodation of aircraft
and associated activities. ESA is preparing an Initial
Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and an Initial Environmental Checklist per the TRPA Code of Ordinances. ESA’s team performed on-site
surveys of biological and cultural resources, coordinated with relevant agencies, developed thorough and
comprehensible summations of potential environmental
impacts and mitigation measures, and assisted with
public outreach.

ESA coordinated with the City, the master planning team, and TRPA planners to prepare the CEQA documentation,
and a Draft IS/MND was published in October 2025. On
October 20, ESA assisted in holding a public workshop
to provide information on the environmental review and
answer questions from interested parties. A Final IS/
MND is anticipated to be adopted in 2026.

Bishop Airport, Runway Safety
Area Improvements NEPA &
CEQA Documentation
Client: Inyo County Department of Public Works
Location: Bishop, CA
Duration: 2022–2024
Scope/Role: ESA assisted the Inyo County Department
of Public Works in preparation of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and CEQA documentation in support
of runway safety area (RSA) improvements for Runway
12/30 at Bishop Airport in Bishop, California. Inyo County identified a need for improvements to achieve a standard RSA at Runway 12/30, the runway accommodating
recently introduced commercial passenger operations
at Bishop Airport. As the project involved federal action as well as discretionary approval by Inyo County, it is subject to both NEPA and CEQA. A draft environmental
assessment (EA) and IS/MND were prepared for the
project. Key environmental issues analyzed in the
environmental documents prepared for this project
include aircraft-generated noise, air emissions, and
biological resources.

ESA worked closely with both Inyo County and the
FAA on this project, coordinating both NEPA and CEQA
documentation. In addition, ESA provided support for a
public workshop conducted in May 2024. The project
was completed in 2024.

Bob Hope Airport, Replacement
Terminal Project EIS
Client: Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority
Location: Burbank, CA
Duration: 2018–2021
Scope/Role: As a part of a larger project team, ESA
helped prepare key sections of the Burbank Bob
Hope Airport Replacement Terminal EIS. The terminal
replacement project proposed the replacement of
the existing 14-gate, 232,000-square-foot passenger
terminal at the Hollywood Burbank Airport to meet
current California seismic design and FAA airport
design standards. ESA began its work on the EIS after
certification of the EIR—which ESA also supported.

ESA prepared the Air Quality Protocol for review and
concurrence by regulatory agencies, including the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California Air
Resources Control Board (CARB), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG), which
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
4 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
742
ultimately led to final approval of methods, models, and data sources by the FAA. ESA authored the Air Quality
and Climate (greenhouse gas emissions) sections
analyzing construction and terminal operations along
with landside transportation. ESA also prepared the
Historic Resources Assessment for the EIS, as well
as several sections of the Affected Environment and
Environmental Consequences chapters of the EIS
sections, including analyses of impacts associated
with biology, hazards and hazardous materials, historic resources, water resources, and biology. ESA team
members also assisted the FAA by answering questions
live during the virtual public meetings and preparing
numerous responses to comments received during the
public review period. The FAA released a Final EIS and
Record of Decision in May 2021.

San Francisco International
Airport, Recommended Airport
Development Plan EIR
Client: San Francisco International Airport (SFO)
Location: San Francisco, CA
Duration: 2019–2026
Scope/Role: ESA managed a complex EIR for SFO’s
next long-term master plan—the Recommended
Airport Development Plan—that will support the
strategic development of the airport over the next two
decades. ESA managed the EIR for SFO’s previous 1989
masterplan (EIR certified in 1992), which served the
continuous growth of the airport over the last 25 years.

The current master plan outlines critical strategies to improve the passenger experience, accommodate an
estimated increase of 20 million air passengers, and
plan for more sustainable and efficient ways to meet the state’s environmental goals. The Final EIR was certified in February 2026.

Sacramento County WattEV
Commercial Charging Center
Client: Sacramento County Department of Airports and
WattEV
Location: Sacramento, CA
Duration: 2019–2025
Scope/Role: ESA led a team to prepare an EA for a
publicly accessible electric vehicle (EV) charging facility to be built on a 110+-acre parcel of land owned by the
Sacramento International Airport (SMF). The facility
would include EV charging stations powered by a new
solar array and would serve shippers and transporters
as well as public transportation and passenger vehicles.

The charging stations, along with three accessory
structures, would provide services to the traveling public (e.g., convenience store, resting lounge, restrooms)
and would be located on the northern portion of the
proposed project site, while the solar array would be
located on the approximately 100 acres in the southern
portion of the site. Agency coordination on the EA
includes Section 7 consultation with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) related to the giant garter
snake; Section 106 consultation with the California
State Historic Preservation Office for historic resources; consultation with the Federal Emergency Management
Agency for floodplains; and consultation with the EPA,
CARB, and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality
Management District for air quality.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
5 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
743
anti-degradation analysis to evaluate whether the project can meet the highest standards for protection of water
quality and beneficial uses.

On-Call Natural Resources
Advisory Services
Client: Sacramento County Department of Airports
Location: Sacramento County, CA
Duration: 2019–Ongoing
Scope/Role: ESA provided natural resources support
and consulting services for the Sacramento County
Airport System (SCAS). This on-call contract covers
a wide variety of natural resources tasks at all of the airports that make up the SCAS. Specific tasks included assisting in CEQA/NEPA compliance; coordinating
mitigation and permitting conditions on a very rapid
schedule with several regulatory agencies (including
the Sacramento County Planning Commission, the
Sacramento County Department of Environmental
Review and Assessment, the Sacramento Metropolitan
Air Quality Management District, the Central Valley
Regional Water Quality Control Board, California
Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW], USFWS,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [USACE], and FAA);
addressing issues related to the Natomas Basin Habitat
Conservation Plan; assisting in land use planning in
regard to wildlife hazard attractants; and assisting SCAS in evaluating a proposal to work cooperatively with the Sacramento Area Flood Control District to increase flood control protection in the Natomas Basin.

Tahoe Keys Lagoon EIR/EIS
Client: Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and Lahontan
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA
Duration: 2019–2022
Scope/Role: Invasive aquatic weeds are a growing
problem for Lake Tahoe, one of two Outstanding
National Resource Waters (ONRW) in California, and the
scientific community is searching for solutions to control and prevent them at their primary source. The spread of aquatic weeds is an immediate threat to Lake Tahoe and
solutions need to be effective, minimize environmental
impacts, comply with regulatory standards, and be
technologically and economically feasible. By testing
methods for controlling aquatic weeds in designated
test areas of the Tahoe Keys lagoons, the most effective methods to reduce the spread of these weeds to other
parts of Lake Tahoe will be evaluated. Primary methods
under evaluation include aquatic herbicides and two
new technologies for aquatic weed control: ultraviolet
(UV) light and laminar flow aeration. Part of a larger
team, ESA is the technical lead responsible for collecting and analyzing data to understand and evaluate the
impacts of the proposed test methods and alternative
management options on the aquatic environment using
expertise in aquatic plant management, limnology,
hydrology, fisheries, aquatic ecology, aquatic toxicology, and risk assessment.

The project team conducted the environmental analyses
in support of a combined EIR/EIS to meet CEQA and
TRPA requirements. To support the analyses, we
conducted extensive baseline water and sediment
sampling, fish surveys, and benthic macroinvertebrate
surveys throughout the lagoons. ESA has developed
a nutrient cycling model to understand how project
actions could affect harmful algal blooms. Because of
Lake Tahoe’s status as an ONRW, ESA also prepared an
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
6 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
744
Mather Airport On-Call Airport
Land Use Commission Advisory
Services
Client: Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Location: Sacramento County, CA
Duration: 2021–Ongoing
Scope/Role: ESA has provided on-call advisory services
to the Sacramento Area Council of Governments
(SACOG) as it performs the responsibilities of the role of Airport Land Use Commission for Sacramento County.

Mather Airport is situated in central Sacramento County in an area experiencing heavy development pressure.

Since assisting SACOG staff with preparation of the
Mather Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP),
ESA has provided advisory services in interpreting
the ALUCP and reviewing development proposals for
consistency with ALUCP policies and criteria. In this
capacity, ESA has coordinated with multiple agencies,
including the California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), the County of Sacramento, and the City of
Rancho Cordova to determine the appropriateness for
development proposals in the environs of Mather Airport and to advise jurisdictions on the potential ramifications of local planning decisions. ESA continues to review
development proposals in the Mather Airport environs on an on-call basis and to advise SACOG staff in an accurate and timely manner.

On-Call CEQA and Biological
Services
Client: Zone 7 Water Agency
Location: Alameda County, CA
Duration: 2001-Ongoing
Scope/Role: Since 2001, ESA has provided technical
biological resources expertise for continuing capital
improvement and maintenance work in the Tri-Valley’s
urban streams and flood control channels, and technical support services to identify and protect sensitive species.

ESA has provided a broadly based range of support
services to Zone 7 over the years, including federal
habitat assessment evaluations and protocol-level
surveys for California red-legged frog, biological
constraints and opportunities analyses for in-stream
enhancement activities, siting of sediment detention
basins and emergency channel repairs, evaluations of
salmonid movement barriers, and detailed evaluations of riparian habitat.

In support of this on-call contract, ESA has conducted
federal protocol-level surveys for the California redlegged frog at more than 100 sites; designed natural stream channels to withstand episodic storm events;
consulted with and acquired permits and authorizations
from the USACE, USFWS, and CDFW; and provided
restoration assistance and construction oversight in
streams and flood control channels throughout Zone 7’s
service area. In areas where rare species are present,
ESA provides construction support in the form of worker training, preconstruction surveys, compliance monitoring, and postconstruction reporting.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
7 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
745

SECTION C
Company History, Background
and Experience
Firm Background and
Experience
Founded in
1969, ESA is a
100 percent
employee-owned
full-service,
multidisciplinary environmental consulting and planning firm, headquartered in San Francisco, with a current staff of more than 700 professionals, including over 450 in the Bay Area alone. With multiple offices nationwide and five offices in Northern California (Sacramento, San Francisco, Petaluma, Oakland, and San Jose), ESA has an array of
technical specialties and is large enough to offer a full range of services but small enough to provide the kind
of personal service and attention that clients expect.

After 57 years in business, clients look to ESA as a single source for well-reasoned, timely, and effective solutions for their project and planning needs. With a heavy focus on aviation, we have established ourselves as the nation’s premier environmental planning consultancy. ESA has
provided airport noise and environmental planning
services, as well as public engagement and facilitation support, for more than 250 airports throughout the
United States (see Figure 1), including 50 in California, and we currently hold active on-call contracts with more than 80 airports.

Our experience spans virtually every type of project at every type of airport ranging from small general aviation airports to some of the most complex commercial
passenger airports in the country. Projects include new runways and runway extensions, taxiway and apron
improvement, T- and box hangars, fueling facilities,
general aviation and commercial terminals, maintenance
repair and overhaul facilities, cargo facilities, landside development programs, access roadways, obstruction
removal, aeronautical and nonaeronautical revenue
enhancement projects, new airport feasibility studies,
and complete airfield reconfiguration projects, among
others.

ESA’s services encompass preparation of ALUCPs;
CEQA and NEPA documentation; and a variety of
technical studies and analyses, including noise and air quality analyses, cultural
resource evaluations,
biological resource
evaluations, safety
and airspace planning
studies, airport master
plans, and wildlife
hazard assessments
and management plans.

Our staff members also
possess expertise in
permitting, environmental
and construction
monitoring, restoration,
and public involvement.
100%
EMPLOYEEOWNED
700+
STAFF
1969

FOUNDED
Figure 1: ESA’s Firmwide Airport Project Locations
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
8 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
746
Familiarity with FAA
NEPA, CEQA, and
TRPA Procedures and
Personnel
ESA has provided a wide range of environmental
services: environmental planning and permitting, noise
analysis, habitat assessments, surveys and monitoring
for federally listed plants and wildlife, mitigation
planning and electronic tracking, and biological permit compliance. A sampling of recent airport projects in
California includes preparation of CEQA documentation
and all associated technical studies for SFO’s Shoreline Protection Program EIR and Recommended Airport
Development Plan (RADP) EIR, NEPA/CEQA analysis
for the high-profile WattEV project at Sacramento
International Airport, NEPA support for John Wayne
Airport, NEPA/CEQA studies for new airline service and
safety area improvements at Bishop Airport, historic
resources evaluations for San Diego International Airport, and mitigation planning for Gnoss Field Airport. ESA has also worked on dozens of NEPA projects throughout the
nation at airports such as Aspen/Pitkin County Airport, where we are providing NEPA support related to the
relocation of the airport’s only runway, development of a new passenger terminal, landside access improvements,
taxiway modifications, apron expansions, and
modification and expansion of the fixed base operator.

ESA’s custom-developed Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for Los Angeles International
Airport tracks more than 600 NEPA/CEQA and
permitting mitigation commitments and won the 2022
ACI Environmental Management Award. ESA’s San
Bernardino Air Cargo Logistics EA was featured in the
2024 FAA Western Pacific Conference in Torrance,
California, as a best practice case study in how to
prepare a legally defensible NEPA document. The case
study was presented by David Kessler, FAA Regional
Environmental Protection Specialist, and Joseph Manalili, FAA Senior Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel.

Our staff members are at the forefront of tracking
the evolution of national regulations as they apply
to NEPA and environmental planning generally. Our
federal regulatory team includes Eric Beightel, the
former Director of the Federal Permitting Improvement
Steering Council, who provides unique insights into
the current regulatory evolution and helps our clients
better understand what to expect moving forward.

ESA’s federal permitting dashboard provides free
industry access to every federal action by the current
administration related to federal environmental policy.

Our work with the FAA through the Policy, Engineering,
Analysis, and Research Support (PEARS II) contract
allows us unique insight into the evolution of FAA’s
environmental policies. With our extensive national
experience, strong technical expertise, and deep local
understanding, the ESA Team is uniquely positioned to
meet the requirements of the scope of services in the
RFQ and exceed the City’s expectations.

ESA is also uniquely positioned to provide support with the various regulatory agencies involved in the approval process of projects in the City of South Lake Tahoe. ESA has extensive experience working with CDFW, USACE,
and the National Marine Fisheries Service. ESA has
recently supported SFO in securing permits from these
and other agencies for the Shoreline Protection Program and regularly supports SFO in coordinating with CDFW
regarding the West of Bayshore property.

The ESA Team has successfully delivered a wide range
of services in the Tahoe Basin, having worked in the
region since the 1970s. ESA has been working with TRPA
for more than 20 years on technology services, including an on-call for development of Lake Tahoe Info and a
TRPA Parcel Tracker for use in conducting species and
plant surveys and control/monitoring and restoration
projects such as the Aquatic Invasive Species Lakewide
Monitoring and Taylor and Tallac Creek Watershed
Assessment and Restoration Plan projects. ESA recently
worked with TRPA to prepare the Tahoe Keys Lagoon
EIR/EIS. Aside from our work with TRPA, ESA was also
the lead in fish and aquatic resources for the Meeks Bay Restoration Project.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
9 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
150
Airports
Served
5 Northern
California
Offices
50 Years of
Environmental
Documentation
85%
Clients
are repeat
business
747
Additionally, our team has developed an efficient and
effective working relationship with Lake Tahoe Airport
staff over the course of multiple 5-year environmental
on-call contracts with Lake Tahoe Airport for airport
and environmental planning services. This working
relationship has allowed ESA to gain firsthand
understanding of the issues the Airport faces and the
preferred processes for addressing those issues.

At ESA, our goal is to effectively guide airports and
other stakeholders through the process of satisfying
environmental regulatory requirements associated with
the ongoing demand for improved facilities and need
to adapt to the ever- changing demands of the aviation
market. We provide an interdisciplinary approach to
addressing and resolving environmental issues, as
well as devising effective and practical solutions to
issues that may arise from projects ranging from small
and simple to large and complex. Our team of highly
skilled professionals has a proven track record of
successfully collaborating with engineers, contractors, stakeholders, and decision-makers to fully assess
potential environmental impacts at all stages of a project.

We effectively navigate the environmental process for
all kinds of projects, from planning through design and construction to postconstruction compliance. We know
how airports operate and how they function as part of
their local and regional communities. This is particularly true for Lake Tahoe Airport, which is situated within
a unique and fairly complex regulatory environment.

Our team’s experience with the environmental issues
and agencies prevalent in the Lake Tahoe region and
the region’s unique regulatory framework makes us
particularly qualified for this contract. We can provide you with a fine balance of aviation knowledge, technical expertise, coordination skills, and dynamic, creative
thinking to guide your Airport’s future development
through the environmental process efficiently and
effectively.

Public Involvement Special-Purpose Laws
and Regulations
Data, Resources,
Science, Models
NEPA
CEQA
TRPA
Legal Precedent
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
10 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
748
Environmental Planning
and Regulatory Compliance
Services
Documentation and Coordination
under the National Environmental
Policy Act
ESA is unique as a firm in that we have been working
with NEPA since it was signed into law in 1970. For more than 50 years, ESA has provided environmental planning
support under NEPA and the special-purpose laws and
regulations that fall under its statutory umbrella. Our aviation consultants are fully supported by specialists in every resource category identified in FAA Order
1050.1G and the 1050.1 Desk Reference. Over the last
several decades, ESA has prepared thousands of NEPA
environmental documents, including some of the
most complex airport NEPA documents developed in
decades. The ESA Team also features several members
with recent experience in federal agencies and whose
knowledge of historic and current practices in federal
agency reviews gives us unparalleled expertise in
interpreting and adapting to a rapidly changing policy
landscape. Our experience in preparing FAA-compliant
environmental documentation and our deep connections
with FAA staff allow us to bring an unrivaled depth of
knowledge to Lake Tahoe Airport under this contract.

NEPA compliance is mandated for every airport project
that requires a federal action (e.g., Airport Layout Plan [ALP] approval, grant funding). This requirement can
vary significantly based on the type of project and its anticipated level of impact to the environment. Recent
changes to FAA policy with the implementation of
Section 743 can reduce the scope of FAA oversight if it meets certain requirements, thereby reducing project
complexity and cost. Like all regulatory processes, the NEPA process is laid out to follow a predictable course of action. However, each project is different and can involve unique demands under NEPA or the various special
purpose laws and regulations that fall under its purview.

ESA’s breadth of experience preparing NEPA documents
allows our team to take a proactive approach to quickly identify potential project-specific issues and risks related to the environmental planning process and to address
them in a quick and efficient manner. By evaluating
potential issues early in the process, we are able to
avoid and minimize impacts, thoroughly document
those efforts, and develop creative and cost-effective
mitigation strategies if necessary. We are experts in
successfully navigating the NEPA process.

Having successfully prepared numerous airportrelated NEPA documents in close coordination with the FAA, ESA has excellent working relationships with
FAA’s Environmental Protection Specialists throughout
California. We are familiar with the FAA’s expectations when it comes to preparing NEPA documents for aviation
related projects.

Coordination and Documentation
under the California Environmental
Quality Act
ESA is equally adept at executing CEQA for projects.

Since CEQA was signed into law in 1970, our firm
has an established 50+-year legacy of successful
CEQA compliance. Our legacy includes approval
and implementation of tens of thousands of projects
throughout California’s metropolitan and rural areas. We combine our firm’s technical depth in natural resources science and environmental planning with unparalleled
knowledge of CEQA practice and procedure, including
the most current legislation and case law, to create
value-added, cost-effective, and legally defensible
solutions for our clients.

ESA has successfully managed CEQA documentation for
some of the most complex and high-profile projects in
California. Our approach is to use all of the tools available under CEQA, including the most current streamlining
methods, to save time and money while minimizing
litigation risk. When ESA prepares a full EIR, our focus is on comprehensiveness and clarity, and the result is
that our EIRs are frequently recognized by professional organizations with awards for creative approach and
quality.

In preparing CEQA documents, our aviation consultants
are fully supported by specialists on biological resources and wetlands permitting, cultural resources and
Assembly Bill (AB) 52 consultation, climate action and
adaptation planning and design, acoustics and vibration, aesthetics and visual resources analyses, and other
such technical disciplines. The result is that ESA offers a cohesive team to solve any CEQA challenge, delivering
solutions and facilitating successful projects and plans. 5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
11 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
749
Coordination and Documentation with
the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Lake Tahoe Airport is unique in that it is located within the jurisdiction of the TRPA and is therefore required to comply with the environmental compliance guidelines
of the agency. The TRPA has specific regulations for
development activities occurring within the Lake Tahoe
region. ESA has coordinated past efforts with the TRPA
for various projects around Lake Tahoe. Integrating TRPA into the planning process from the beginning is essential to ensure that a project in the Lake Tahoe region gains the necessary TRPA buy-in and approvals. Typically,
the NEPA process for an airport project would require
working with the FAA to determine whether an EA or an
EIS is required. However, in the Lake Tahoe region, the TRPA also has that authority based on regionally defined environmental thresholds, goals, and objectives that
can differ from those defined by the FAA. Completed in
parallel with any NEPA or CEQA documentation and in
full coordination with the TRPA, an Initial Environmental Checklist is used to determine whether a project is
exempt from further TRPA requirements. Based on
TRPA findings, the project could require additional
environmental documentation in the form of an EA
or an EIS, even if during their parallel process the
FAA determines it is not necessary. Regardless of the
outcome of a TRPA determination, it is essential to
coordinate with TRPA staff throughout the environmental process to ensure a smooth path to final TRPA project
approval.

TRPA coordination will be overseen by Patrick Hickman
(ESA), Carol Beahan (Wildscape Engineering), and
Chris Fitzer (ESA) . Patrick has recently coordinated
with TRPA on the environmental review for the ongoing
Airport Master Plan Update, and ESA Team member
Wildscape Engineering has managed permitting with
the TRPA for numerous projects. Wildscape Engineering
is located on-Airport, and Carol lives in the Lake Tahoe area; therefore, our team can provide immediate local
response to any issue that might arise. In addition, the ESA Team has staff in our Sacramento and Bay Area
offices with extensive TRPA experience who are ready to participate when required. Below is a listing of some of the projects ESA has worked on in the Lake Tahoe region in close collaboration with the TRPA in recent years:

Î Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and Lahontan
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Tahoe Keys
Lagoons Aquatic Weed Control Methods Test EIR/
EIS, City of South Lake Tahoe, CA
Î California Tahoe Conservancy, Upper Truckee River
and Marsh and Lower West Side Wetland Restoration
Project, City of South Lake Tahoe, CA
Î California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sierra District, Upper Truckee River Restoration and Golf
Course Relocation Project EIR/EIS, El Dorado County,
CA
Î Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Lake Tahoe
Shorezone Ordinance Amendments Final EIS and
Response to Comments, Tahoe Basin, California and
Nevada
Î U.S. Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management
Unit North Shore Access and Travel Management
Plan EA and Biological Evaluation/Biological
Assessment (BE/BA), Lake Tahoe, CA
Î South Lake Tahoe Public Utilities District,
Revegetation Design for South Lake Tahoe Public
Utilities District Comprehensive Facility-Wide Erosion
Control Project, City of South Lake Tahoe and El
Dorado County, CA
The review processes associated with each of the above
agencies are illustrated in Figure 2.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
12 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
750

TRPA NEPA
(Environmental Assessment) CEQA
Planning Planning Planning
Coordinate Project
Definition with TRPA Define the Proposed Project Define the Proposed Project Complete an Initial Environmental
Checklist (IEC) Determine potential impacts Lead agency determinesexemption TRPA issues findings based on the IEC:

Project could have none/mitigated
effects on the environment – no further
documentation
More information is needed
requiring an EA
Significant impacts to the
environment require an EIS to
be produced
FAA determines if a CatEx is sufficient
(Most projects in the CIP could be CatEx),
if not and an EA will be needed
If the project is not exempt, the
Lead Agency determines which
document is required:

Negative Declaration, Negative
Mitigated Declaration or
Environmental Impact Report Determine appropriate level of public involvement
Prepare EA and determine if significant
impacts exist; if they
cannot be mitigated, move to EIS
Circulate Draft EA for public comment;
provide notification of availability
Revise EA based on comments, as
applicable
Prepare Final EA and FAA prepares a
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
and potentially Record of Decision (ROD)
Final EA and FONSI or FONSI/ROD
available to public
Final TRPA Approval The NEPA process is complete
If an EIR is required, a Notice of
Preparation (NOP) is required
NOP is circulated for
Public Comment
Prepare Draft EIR
Circulate Draft EIR
Prepare responses to comments/
revise EIR
Certification Process –
Notice of Determination
Figure 2: Agency Environmental Review Process Flows
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
13 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
751
Project Team
ESA has assembled a team of firms with the skillsets
and experience to assist Lake Tahoe Airport with airport environmental documentation requirements, as well as
the planning, engineering, permitting, and coordination with agencies and stakeholders. This combination of
firms and skillsets will ensure proactive, seamless,
cost-effective, and timely implementation of projects.

Woolpert is a longtime ESA collaborator with whom
we partnered on the previous South Lake Tahoe Airport
on-call contract. Woolpert brings complimentary airport planning experience in airports in California, specifically as a partner with ESA at Lake Tahoe Airport on the
previous on-call contract. Wildscape Engineering is
a local Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) firm
with strong local experience in the Lake Tahoe region as well as hyper local knowledge of the airport. Wildscape Engineering has familiarity with the TRPA permitting
process and offers a local, hands-on approach.

Woolpert
Services Woolpert will provide
Î Master Planning
Î Airfield/Landside Design
Î Facilities Planning
Woolpert delivers
comprehensive, in-house
aviation services tailored to
the unique needs of our aviation clients. They support
projects for public and private airports, airport tenants, the FAA, military installations, state aviation departments, airlines, and private developers, often simultaneously at the same airport. Their team brings deep expertise in
both airside and landside development, creating safe,
efficient, cost-effective, and secure facilities that support long-term growth.

With decades of experience planning and executing
complex airport projects in all 50 states, Woolpert
understands how to balance the needs of multiple
stakeholders. Focusing on airport development, industry regulations, and emerging aviation trends, they help
clients meet today’s operational demands without
compromising future objectives. Their complete lifecycle services enable clients to successfully navigate an
evolving regulatory and environmental landscape.

Woolpert’s planners, engineers, architects, and
construction professionals have a thorough
understanding of the airport operating environment. This expertise allows them to deliver practical, compliant
solutions that minimize disruption to daily operations
while meeting all applicable design standards and
regulatory requirements.

Wildscape Engineering
Services Wildscape Engineering will provide:

Î TRPA Coordination
Î Permitting
Î SWPPP & SWCC
Î Hyper Local Presence
Î DBE
Wildscape Engineering is a full-service
ecological engineering and restoration firm
based at the Lake Tahoe Airport. They are a
woman-owned, certified Small Business
Enterprise (Certification #2023565) in the State of
California, established in 2008. The company operates
as an S corporation under Federal Tax ID #47-4046279
and has a City of South Lake Tahoe Business License
#006076.

Wildscape Engineering’s president, Carol Beahan,
PE, QSD, has been effectively planning, designing,
permitting, implementing, and monitoring public and
private projects in the highly regulated Tahoe Basin for over 20 years. Their staff have the technical expertise in all aspects of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) and County fuel storage compliance (i.e.,
California Environmental Reporting System [CERS]) to
properly develop and implement SWPPPs and spill
prevention, control, and countermeasures (SPCCs) and to proficiently monitor and train other staff to comply with all SWPPP requirements under the Lake Tahoe Basin
Construction Stormwater General Permit (Lake Tahoe
Basin Order RT6-2016-0010) and the California Industrial General Permit (Order 2014-0057-DWQ). Wildscape
Engineering also provides the full suite of engineering, hydrology, ecological restoration, geographic information system (GIS) and CAD drafting, planning, and permitting services that may be useful in supporting SWPPP and
related planning and permitting efforts.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
14 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
752
Wildscape Engineering has successfully provided
SWPPP services in the Lake Tahoe Basin and throughout
Northern California and Nevada since 2009, and they are excited by the opportunity to provide their expertise and SWPPP services in support of the Lake Tahoe Airport.

Wildscape Engineering has two Qualified SWPPP
Developers (QSDs) and four Qualified SWPPP
Practitioners (QSPs) on staff, all based out of the local Tahoe office to readily serve the Tahoe Airport and
respond rapidly to summer thunderstorm events that
form quickly and show up in localized areas. The QSD
and QSP stay up to date on SWPPP training, costeffective and Lahontan-acceptable best management practice (BMP) products and procedures, and proper
storm sampling protocol, and they coordinate with
Western Environmental Testing (Wetlab) in Sparks,
Nevada, on a regular basis to ensure samples are
collected and analyzed within the required time frames.

The QSD/P staff are also well practiced in providing
SWPPP weekly trainings to contractor crews and staff
and they have several specific BMP training material
handouts already developed that provide an easy and
informative 15- to 20-minute on-site training that meets the Tahoe construction permit requirements.

Wildscape Engineering has developed and implemented
SWPPPs for public agencies and municipalities over the
past decade in and around Tahoe including the City of
South Lake Tahoe, Caltrans, South Tahoe Public Utility
District, California Tahoe Conservancy, and the U.S.

Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service Lake
Tahoe Basin Management Unit. Wildscape Engineering
has also applied for and acquired resource agency
permits for residential and commercial development and
marina dredging projects in the Tahoe Basin, including
the State Water Resource Control Board 401 Water
Quality Certificate, USACE 404 permit, CDFW Streambed
Alteration Agreement, TRPA Environmental Improvement
Program ( EIP) and commercial construction permits,
and TRPA BMP Certificates. The staff possess in-depth
knowledge of the California Construction General Permit, the California Industrial General Permit, the Clean Water Act Section 402, and the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System requirements. Wildscape Engineering
is currently providing Qualified Industrial Practitioner SWPPP services under the California Industrial General
Permit for South Tahoe Refuse, Sierra Tahoe Ready Mix,
and other clients in the San Francisco Bay Area. Their
staff has also been providing and continue to provide
monthly inspection, stormwater monitoring, and water
quality and sampling analysis services for several Tahoe marinas as required under the Tahoe Marina General
Permit.

Additionally, ESA enjoys positive working relationships with allied firms across a variety of specializations.

This allows us to easily identify and contract with
subconsultants on an as-needed basis to attend to any
specific effort that may require distinctive knowledge
outside the ESA Team’s core specialties.

Organizational Chart
Figure 3: Organizational Chart outlines the structure of our proposed team. Our proposed team includes staff
with specific and proven leadership and expertise in key areas necessary for this contract. The ESA Team will
be led by Patrick Hickman, as the day-to-day project
manager. Patrick will be the primary point of contact for the Airport, and he will be responsible for overseeing
and delivering the scope, schedule, budget, and quality performance of our work. Patrick will be supported by
Eryn Brennan, who will manage the internal project
coordination as project director, leveraging Patrick’s time to focus on the technical issues and coordination with
the Airport. Steve Smith, from ESA, will assist Patrick in preparing and reviewing the CEQA documentation
for projects under the contract. Together, the Project
Management Team will oversee the preparation of all
required environmental documentation and coordination
for the Airport’s projects. Individual tasks will be handled by task leads depending on whether the project is
primarily focused on environmental documentation,
planning, permitting, or, if needed, engineering/
architecture. Although environmental documentation
is a field of specialty in its own right, all tasks will be completed with an integrated environmental
documentation and coordination approach to accelerate
NEPA, CEQA, and TRPA approvals when the task and
project matures to the environmental documentation and
coordination stage.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
15 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
753
Project Team Experience
Below are qualification summaries for our project
management team. In addition, our team includes
several technical specialists with expertise in the areas identified in the County’s Request for Qualifications.

More detailed information about project experience for
those individuals is contained in our full team resumes provided in Appendix A.

Eryn Brennan | Project Director
Eryn has 18 years of experience preparing
and developing NEPA and CEQA
documentation for a range of mid- to
large-scale development projects and
master plans. As project director, Eryn will ensure this contract has all necessary staff in place and resources are assigned promptly. Her extensive project
management experience, combined with her technical
expertise, allows for seamless project facilitation through the environmental review process. Eryn has successfully managed dozens of projects through the environmental
review process, and specializes in managing large,
complex EIRs with extensive technical teams. Recent
project work includes San Francisco International
Airport’s Recommended Airport Development Plan EIR
as well as their Shoreline Protection Program Project
EIR.

Eryn’s Responsibilities
Î Project Oversight
Î Quality Control /Assurance
Figure 3: Organizational Chart
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
16 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com

STRATEGIC

ADVISOR
Michael Arnold

AIR QUALITY
Chris Dugan

HISTORIC

ARCHITECTURAL

RESOURCES
Becky Urbano

NOISE & VIBRATION
LEAD
Chris Dugan
Chris Nottoli
Aviation

SOCIOECONOMICS
& ENVIRONMENTAL

JUSTICE
Luke Evans LAND USE &

PLANNING
Patrick Hickman,

AICP, PLA

UTILITIES &

SERVICE SYSTEMS
Michael Burns, CHG,

CEG, PG, QSD VISUAL/AESTHETICS
Steve Smith
GHG
Brian Schuster

PUBLIC SERVICES &

RECREATION
Steve Smith

PERMITTING
Permitting/Compliance
Priya Finnemore
Carol Beahan1

SWPPP/SWCC
Carol Beahan1
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Michael Burns, CHG,

CEG, PG, QSD

PLANNING
Master Planning
Tony Davis2
Morgan Einspahr2
Sustainability
Neal Wolfe
Airspace
Patrick Hickman,

AICP, PLA
GIS
Patrick Hickman,

AICP, PLA
Eryn Pimentel

PROJECT

DIRECTOR
Eryn Brennen

PROJECT MANAGER
Patrick Hickman, AICP, PLA

DEPUTY PROJECT

MANAGER
Steve Smith

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

TECHNICAL TEAM

HYDROLOGY,

WETLANDS & WATER

QUALITY
Carol Beahan1
Matt Brennan
Subconsultants: 1 Wildscape Engineering 2 Woolpert
DominicScarano
Aviation

ARCHAEO/CULTURAL
MattRussell,PhD,RPA
HeidiKoenig,RPA

BIOLOGICAL

RESOURCES
MandiMcElroy
BrianPittman,CWB
ChrisFitzer

COMMUNITY

ENGAGEMENT
AutumnWard

ENGINEERING/

ARCHITECTURE
Airfield Engineering/
Facilities Planning
Kirk Nielsen, PE
754
Patrick Hickman, PLA, AICP | Project
Manager, Planning Lead
Patrick is a land use planner and landscape
architect with expertise in airport land use
compatibility planning, environmental
analysis, GIS analysis and mapping, and site
planning and design. Patrick has worked on a variety of projects throughout the United States, including airport master plans, airport land use compatibility plans,
CEQA/NEPA environmental studies, and other planning
efforts. Relevant project experience for Patrick includes the Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Update IS/MND,
Bishop Airport Runway Safety Area Improvements
NEPA/CEQA, Crystal River Airport Runway Extension
EA; Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Part 150
Noise Exposure Mapping, and many others.

Patrick’s Responsibilities
Î Project Management
Î Planning Lead
Î Land Use Planning
Steve Smith | Deputy Project Manager
Steve has more than 20 years of experience
leading the preparation of environmental,
technical, and regulatory compliance
documentation for a broad range of public
and private projects. Steve manages and contributes to
initial studies, EIRs, EAs, EISs, and regulatory permit applications. Steve has extensive experience managing
the environmental compliance process and provides
responsive and technically excellent service to his
clients. His relevant project experience includes being a technical analyst and deputy project manager for the
Lake Tahoe Airport, San Bernardino International
Airport, Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, and
Westover Field Airport, among others.

Steve’s Responsibilities
Î Deputy Project Manager
Î Technical Author
Î Environmental Analyst
Michael Arnold | Strategic Advisor
Mike has more than 35 years of planning,
environmental, and noise experience at
more than 130 domestic and international
airports. His expertise includes airport
planning, strategic planning, noise, airspace, land use compatibility, forecasting, and integration of planning and environmental processes. Mike has served in a
leadership role on more than 25 airport master plans and has managed and supported more than 50 NEPA
projects and 50 airport noise and land use compatibility studies. His NEPA experience includes environmental
studies for a wide range of projects, including new
runways and major airfield reconfigurations; new terminal configurations; landside improvements; air cargo and
maintenance, repair, and overhaul facilities; fixed base operator facilities; and a wide range of non-aeronautical projects. His extensive noise experience involves virtually every possible type of noise and operational issue at
many of the busiest and most complex general aviation
and commercial passenger airports in the world. Mike’s
NEPA experience includes projects at airports such as
Sacramento International Airport, Miami International
Airport, and Orlando International Airport. Additionally, he recently oversaw noise studies for Fort Lauderdale
International Airport, John F. Kennedy International
Airport, LaGuardia Airport, and Tampa International
Airport.

Mike is an active leader in the aviation industry and
regularly speaks and facilitates discussions on a wide
variety of industry issues, including NEPA, aircraft noise, advanced air mobility, sustainability/resilience, land use compatibility, forecasting, integration of planning and environmental processes, and the changing needs of
airport planning.

Mike’s Responsibilities
Î Strategic Planning
Î Quality Control /Assurance
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
17 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
755
Carol Beahan, PE, QSD/P | Permitting
Lead
Carol has 20 plus years of experience
managing similar planning, design, and
implementation efforts. She has managed
watershed and feasibility assessments,
alternatives analyses, design development, construction documents and oversight, community and stakeholder
coordination, hydrologic and water quality assessments, permit acquisition, and construction monitoring. Her
experience running a successful company over many
years and managing collaborative high-profile projects
combined with her strong desire to see communities
benefit alongside nature will be key in supporting the
Airport in achieving their facility improvements.

Prior to becoming an engineer, Carol was the wildlife
education director at Sulphur Creek Nature Park
in Hayward, California, where her duties included
leading educational tours, presenting at schools and
assemblies, teaching creek classes, writing press
releases and monthly newsletters, and developing
education materials. She carried these writing and oral communication skills forward into her engineering career in various forms, including well-received CEQA/NEPA
water quality and hydrology sections, design guidance
reports, wetland management plans, and presentations
to various governing boards and community and public
planning meetings and conferences.

Ms. Beahan has wide-ranging experience in Northern
California and the Sierras from watershed conceptual
planning to construction implementation within
sensitive and challenging environments. She has
managed multidisciplinary teams to assess and
design water quality, fish passage, wildlife habitat, and recreation improvements. Ms. Beahan has developed
and implemented design plans, specifications, cost
estimates, bid packages, and preconstruction and
postconstruction and mitigation monitoring plans and
has provided impacts analyses for various environmental documents and acquired numerous construction
permits. She has provided construction oversight on
several impactful meadow, river, and wetland restoration projects and has coordinated and led public and
stakeholder meetings and community workshops.

Carol’s Responsibilities
Î Permitting
Î SWPPP
Î SWCC
Î TRPA Coordination
Kirk Nielsen, PE | Engineering /
Facilities Lead
Kirk has managed complex airport projects
and programs since 1996 and was recently
appointed to the State of Utah’s Aviation
Advisory Board, providing valuable insight
into UDOT and FAA processes and procedures. Prior to
joining Woolpert, he served in multiple roles at UDOT,
including program manager, aeronautical planner, and
project manager for the state system plan, and
contributed to the Sensitive Species Habitat
Management Plan and development of annual Capital
Improvement Programs (CIPs). Over the past nine years,
Kirk has served as both client liaison and project
manager for many of TVL’s projects, building strong
working relationships with staff and developing a
thorough understanding of the airport and its operational and programmatic complexities. At Woolpert, he
coordinates CIPs in Utah, California, Texas, and Nevada, working closely with state DOTs and the FAA on behalf of clients.

Kirk’s Responsibilities
Î Engineering / Design
Î Airport Facilities Planning
Î Utilities
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
18 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
756

SECTION D
Scope of Work - Qualifications
Introduction
ESA understands that Lake Tahoe Airport is seeking a
team of environmental consultants who can reliably
operate under dynamic and sometimes sudden
circumstances. Our team is composed of skilled problem
solvers with access to industry-leading expertise that
can be leveraged to address a variety of environmental
concerns that may be encountered over the course of
the 5-year term. This section describes how the ESA
Team will not only provide any environmental services
associated with the established Capital Improvement
Program, but will also stand ready to assist Airport
staff in confronting the challenging environmental and
regulatory issues that may emerge independently.

Environmental Planning
and Regulatory
Compliance Services
Lake Tahoe Airport has a need for extended
environmental planning support. At ESA, our goal is
to assist airports in successfully navigating the rigors of environmental regulatory compliance, including
meeting new and emerging demands at the local, state,
and federal levels. CEQA and NEPA documentation
carry their own intricacies when it comes to meeting
lead agency requirements and obligations to engage
in consultation with outside parties under the various
laws and regulations that fall under these “umbrella
statutes.” However, projects in the Lake Tahoe region
carry their own unique range of challenges due to
the role of TRPA and various local stakeholders in the
environmental planning process. Maintaining complex
project schedules while ensuring proper and timely
coordination between this range of stakeholders is key
to the successful completion of any project in the Lake Tahoe region.

The ESA Team brings an interdisciplinary approach to
resolving environmental issues and devising practical
solutions for the full range of airport projects, from
the smallest to the largest and most complex. Our
professionals effectively collaborate with engineers,
contractors, stakeholders, and decision-makers to fully assess potential environmental impacts at all stages of a project, from planning through design and construction
to postconstruction compliance. Our approach begins
with our understanding of not only how airports operate on a daily basis, but also how they interrelate with their local and regional communities. Our experience with
the environmental issues and the legal framework
influencing airport development makes us uniquely
qualified for this type of contract. We balance aviation knowledge, technical expertise, coordination skills,
insight, and creativity to allow for maximum flexibility in airport development with minimum cost and impacts to
the environment. We also take pride in helping improve
stakeholder relations and communication as part of the
coordination/consultation process.

We have extensive experience in successfully
completing the various tasks the airport has identified.

In addition to ESA, the Project Team includes engineers proficient in the full design cycle of a project, whether the project is focused on the airfield, airport facilities, airspace/navigational aids, or landside. Whatever the
level needed by the Airport, be it project environmental definition, preliminary 25% design, or full 100%
design, it can be met by our team. We work with our
subconsultants to implement regular internal project
briefings and reviews. ESA also implements a rigorous
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program through
which all deliverables are processed before delivery
to our clients. This includes review by publication
specialists and technical editors to ensure intelligible, technically sound documentation that are easily
accessible to the interested public.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
19 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
757
Contemplated
Scope of Work
The following provides a detailed discussion of the
scope of work contemplated under this Request for
Qualifications and ESA’s understanding of what efforts
will be necessary to successfully complete these tasks.

Key to successful completion of these projects is the
need to secure timely environmental approvals for these over the 5-year term of this contract.

Fiscal Year 2026–2027
The contract is anticipated to begin at the end of fiscal year 2025–2026. Tasks identified for completion at the
end of fiscal year 2026–2027 include preparation of
rough order of magnitude cost estimates with particular attention to services not funded by grants. An initial
scoping discussion with the FAA may be required
to identify the appropriate level of environmental
documentation necessary to clear the elements of the
Airport Layout Plan Update and Airport Master Plan
anticipated to be completed in 2026. Each of these tasks is further discussed below.

Rough Order of Magnitude Cost
Estimates
ESA will work with the Airport to prepare rough order of cost estimates for upcoming anticipated projects with
a focus on non-grant eligible capital projects subject to environmental review. It is understood that these cost
estimates are for financial planning purposes only. ESA will leverage expertise acquired through decades of
experience to provide the most accurate cost estimates
possible.

Initial Scoping
The Airport also contemplates meeting with the FAA to
discuss what level of environmental documentation will
be necessary for an Airport Layout Plan with Narrative
Report or a Master Plan Update. ESA will help facilitate this call on behalf of the Airport. Projects anticipated to begin in fiscal year 2026–2027 include Runway 18/36
surface treatments and painting, and rehabilitation of
Lisa Maloff Way.

Fiscal Year 2027–2028
Tasks identified for completion during fiscal
year 2027–2028 include initiation of Phase I
of the Taxiway Improvements project to
include rehabilitation of Taxiway A and
associated NEPA, CEQA, and TRPA approvals. The ESA
Team will work in coordination with the Airport’s selected engineering firm .

Phase I Taxiway Improvements
The Airport anticipates awarding a qualified design and engineering firm to begin design work for Phase I of
the Taxiway A rehabilitation. During this phase, ESA will coordinate with the Airport and the selected engineering firm to provide any preliminary evaluation of potential environmental considerations.

NEPA Documentation – Taxiway A
Rehabilitation
ESA will coordinate with the Airport and the FAA
environmental protection specialist to identify the
appropriate NEPA documentation for approval of the
Taxiway A Rehabilitation. Once determined, ESA will
ensure that any documents are fully completed in
compliance with current regulations and FAA Orders.

CEQA Documentation – Taxiway A
Rehabilitation
ESA will coordinate with the Airport to determine
the level of CEQA documentation necessary for
environmental clearance for the Taxiway A Rehabilitation and will prepare the relevant documents in accordance
with the CEQA statutes.

TRPA Environmental Documentation –
Taxiway A Rehabilitation
ESA will work with the Airport and TRPA to ensure that
the appropriate TRPA environmental documentation
is completed for the planned taxiway rehabilitation.

If needed, an Initial Environmental Checklist will be
completed for the TRPA in compliance with the TRPA
Code of Ordinances.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
20 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
758
Fiscal Year 2028–2029
Tasks to be completed during fiscal year
2028–2029 are yet to be determined. ESA
will coordinate with the Airport as necessary
during this time to provide any requested
support to management and staff.

Fiscal Year 2029–2030
Phase II of the Taxiway Rehabilitation will
commence in fiscal year 2029–2030, to
include compliance with relevant NEPA,
CEQA, and TRPA environmental regulations.

NEPA Documentation – Phase II
Taxiway Improvements
Continuing with the coordination undertaken during
the previous fiscal years, ESA will work with the Airport and the FAA’s environmental protection specialist to
identify and complete the appropriate level of NEPA
documentation for the Phase II Taxiway Improvements
project. Depending on the extent of the alterations to the taxiway geometry, ESA anticipates either a Categorical
Exclusion (CatEx) or, potentially, an EA will be needed for full compliance. ESA will ensure that either document is fully completed in compliance with current regulations
and FAA Orders. Anticipated environmental analyses
include, but are not limited to, a noise study, air quality/ greenhouse gas analyses, biological resources analysis, wetlands analysis, hazardous materials assessment, and
analysis of impacts to water resources. Preparation of an EA would require a robust public involvement program
to ensure that residents of the surrounding communities are engaged in the NEPA process.

CEQA Documentation – Phase II
Taxiway Improvements
ESA also understands that the Taxiway Improvements
project is a discretionary action, subject to approval by the South Lake Tahoe City Council, and thus subject to
CEQA. The ESA Team will prepare an initial study and
all associated technical analyses and documentation
in support of the initial study. Similar to the effort
anticipated for the NEPA documentation, anticipated
environmental analyses will include but not be limited
to a noise study, air quality/greenhouse gas analyses,
biological resources analysis, wetlands analysis,
hazardous materials assessment, and analyses of
impacts to water resources. A common mistake made
by consultants in the preparation of CEQA documents is
the assumption that environmental analyses prepared
for NEPA documents can be used for preparing CEQA
documentation (and vice versa), which is not necessarily the case. ESA will ensure that all environmental analyses prepared for the CEQA document will be consistent with
CEQA requirements.

TRPA Environmental Documentation –
Phase II Taxiway Improvements
ESA will work with the Airport and TRPA to ensure that
the appropriate TRPA environmental documentation
is completed for the planned taxiway improvement.

If needed, an Initial Environmental Checklist will be
completed for the TRPA in compliance with the TRPA
Code of Ordinances.

Fiscal Year 2030–2031
The Airport has identified rehabilitation and
design of the Runway 18/36 pavement as
the priority project for fiscal year 2030–
2031. The project will enhance the safety
and integrity of the runway while implementing an
FAA-compliant design. To advance the runway pavement
rehabilitation design, ESA will perform all necessary
coordination and review for compliance with NEPA,
CEQA, and the TRPA Code of Ordinances in concurrence
with project design development.

NEPA Environmental Documentation –
Runway 18/36 Rehabilitation Design
ESA will work with the Airport and the FAA to identify the appropriate level of NEPA environmental documentation
necessary for the planned pavement rehabilitation
design.

The ESA Team will review engineering designs and
coordinate with the Airport and the FAA. It is understood that based on further coordination with the FAA, a CatEx (likely a documented CatEx) or EA will be the required
environmental documentation. ESA will ensure that
either document is fully completed in compliance with
FAA Orders and the required environmental analyses are
completed to our exacting technical requirements.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
21 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
759
CEQA Environmental Documentation –
Runway 18/36 Rehabilitation Design
ESA will work with the Airport to ensure that the
appropriate CEQA environmental documentation is
completed. The ESA Team anticipates a CEQA CatEx will
be the appropriate environmental review documentation
for the Runway 18/36 rehabilitation design.

TRPA Environmental Documentation –
Runway 18/36 Rehabilitation Design
ESA will work with the Airport and the TRPA to ensure
that the appropriate environmental documentation
is completed in compliance with the TRPA Code of
Ordinances.

As-Needed Capital
Improvements 2026–2031
ESA understands all proposed projects are
dependent upon funding derived from the
federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP)
and Caltrans, as well as Airport funding. As
the various project elements will require sponsor
approval prior to being obligated, ESA understands that some of the associated services enumerated in the
Request for Qualifications may be cancelled or revised.

Furthermore, ESA understands additional services not
initially included in the Request for Qualifications may be initiated, and the ESA team will coordinate with the
Airport to perform any required tasks as needs emerge
and information becomes available.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
22 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
760

SECTION E
Financial Responsibility
Approach to Execution
and Management of
Services
ESA’s approach to the execution and management
of services includes developing well-thought-out
scopes, budgets, and schedules; tracking progress; and
communicating that progress to our clients frequently
so that they are informed. Lake Tahoe Airport will benefit from our overall approach to providing the highest
quality management services. In choosing ESA, you will
have a consultant on your team that will:

Implement Solutions—ESA is solution-oriented. Once
solutions have been identified and agreed upon, we
implement those solutions efficiently and effectively to meet the identified needs.

Review for Improvement—Part of implementing
solutions is constantly reviewing our work, thereby
driving our team toward high performance and
continuous improvement.

In addition, ESA will approach execution and
management services by providing Lake Tahoe Airport
with the following:

Responsive Project Management. Communication
is key to effective project management. ESA will
collaborate with the Airport to provide perspective,
bring key issues or questions to your attention, and
inform the development of solutions. Patrick Hickman,
with support from Eryn Brennan as the Project Director, will communicate clearly and often with Airport staff
to ensure that we understand expectations and goals
for tasks and deliverables and administrative needs for progress reports, invoicing, and contract management
requirements. Through regular check-in calls and written communication, Patrick will coordinate the status of
tasks, invoicing, overall contract budget status, and any issues that may arise so we can strategically address
them before they unintentionally affect budget or
schedule. Patrick has a track record of being accessible not only during standard work hours, but also at night
and on weekends when needed. Regardless of the
time of day, certain situations have sometimes involved deployment of technical staff to respond to pressing
situations. ESA is accustomed to, and thrives in, situations where multiple, concurrent tasks are being executed.

Cost and Schedule Management. ESA project
managers prioritize timely, cost-effective delivery of
quality products and services as key to a successful
project. Patrick will use ESA’s project management tools Listen—We listen and ask questions so that we
understand your goals and desired outcomes for the
project and the potential challenges you face.

Identify Strategies—Based on our shared
understanding, we collaborate with you to explore
successful strategies and provide you the information
you need to make an informed decision on how to best
achieve project goals. We will be there with you, thinking through and planning potential outcomes to identify
workable strategies.

Listen
Implement
Solutions
Identify
Strategies
Review for
Improvement

PERFORMANCE
VALUE
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
23 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
761
to monitor, manage, and report project performance.

ESA uses Deltek Vantagepoint to carefully monitor
project budgets. The Deltek system allows us to
track expenditures by each staff member in real time,
so everyone can manage their time relative to the
requirements of individual task assignments. This system also allows staff members to annotate timesheet entries, which Patrick will use when preparing the monthly
progress report or responding to questions from the
Airport about work progress.

QA/QC Focus
Î Technical Adequacy
Î Policy Consistency
Î Study Protocol
Compliance
Î Document Consistency
Î Cost and Schedule
Control and Tracking
ESA uses a webbased project
management
dashboard that
shows the key
financial metrics for
each project at the
task level: contract
amount, spent-todate, remaining
budget, and “burn
rate.” Since the initial implementation of this system in 2020, our project managers have reported greater
success in dealing with potential budget issues and
greater ability to share budget information with clients.

For schedule management, we typically use Microsoft
Project or Excel spreadsheets with tasks and timelines.

ESA will identify interdependencies and forecasting
durations associated with critical-path activities.

Schedules will be updated regularly to reflect project
progress.

Efficient Contract Administration and Accounting. ESA’s approach to efficient contract administration starts with assigning a project accountant who is well versed in Lake Tahoe Airport’s project accounting and specific invoicing requirements. Our accounting team shares a client
service perspective that involves recognizing the unique qualities of contract and client needs. Accountants
often coordinate between internal project managers
and client representatives to gain an understanding of
project reporting needs before setting up the job in the accounting system. Our Deltek Vantagepoint system
allows for a high degree of flexibility, which we use to maximum capacity to customize for both internal project management needs and ideally configured client invoice
deliverables. Complete project manager portfolios are
often assigned to a single project accountant, which
facilitates long-term cooperative relationships whose
partners are well equipped to swiftly adapt to changing needs as projects progress.

In partnership with Patrick Hickman, the project
accountant will remain flexible, listening closely, making changes, and adapting to meet Lake Tahoe Airport’s
needs. The project accountant will provide progress
reporting and task order and invoice management. Our
aim is to provide scalable resources to respond to both predictable and unpredictable service requests under
this contract.

Quality Deliverables. As part of our technical services, ESA maintains strict adherence to a quality assurance/
quality control (QA/QC) program. Key elements of
ESA’s standard project QA/QC program include (1) early
guidance from team management to technical staff on
standards for content and format; (2) first-draft product review by key specific senior technical staff members
within each technical discipline; (3) second review of the analysis and technical writing by the project manager; (4) third review for readability by the technical editor; and (5) final review by the project manager before delivery to the Airport. This approach provides for the preparation of documents that are defensible, technically accurate, and tailored to meet client needs.

With this structure, ESA provides Lake Tahoe Airport
with the best combination of project management,
contract administration, and technical resources to meet the needs of this contract. Our structure reflects our
commitment to continuous improvement in providing the
Airport with the most cost-effective, organized, and highquality services. 5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
24 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
762

SECTION F
Description of Recent Projects/
References
As evidenced by our previous California work (detailed in Section B) and supported by our client references, ESA consistently produces the highest quality deliverables on time and on budget. Our relationships with the FAA and regulatory agencies combined with our staff’s unmatched experience and knowledge allows us to deliver quality and results on even the most aggressive schedules. The following client references have been offered as those with direct knowledge of the ESA Team’s capability to conduct NEPA and CEQA environmental documentation.

Project Reference Project Description
Several SFO
Projects
Audrey Park, Environmental
Affairs Manager

SAN FRANCISCO

INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Phone: (415) 821-7844
Email: [email protected]
Ongoing on-call contract for which ESA is preparing a variety of CEQA/NEPA technical reports and documents. Efforts to date have included biological monitoring and assisting with natural resources planning and permitting for multiple projects. In addition, ESA responded to talk orders to prepare multiple CEQA addenda, IS/MNDs, and EIRs.

ESA technical staff have prepared a variety of studies and reports, including but not limited to:

Î Air quality modeling
Î Geoarchaeological coring
Î Hazardous materials reports (Phase I Environmental Site Assessments [ESA])
Î Historic resource and archeological reports
Î Hydrological modeling
Î Noise analyses
Î CEQA/NEPA documentation for Caltrans Permitting support Bishop Airport
Part 139
Certification
NEPA/
CEQA; Bishop
Airport RSA
Improvements

NEPA/CEQA
Ashley Helms, Deputy Director
– Airports

COUNTY OF INYO, PUBLIC
WORKS
Phone: (760) 878-0263
Email: [email protected]
ESA assisted the Inyo County Department of Public Works in preparation of NEPA and CEQA documentation in support of RSA improvements for Runway 12/30 at Bishop Airport in Bishop, California. Inyo County identified a need for improvements to achieve a standard RSA at Runway 12/30, the runway
accommodating recently introduced commercial passenger
operations at Bishop Airport.

Sacramento
County WattEV
Commercial
Charging Center
Zach Frese

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
– DEPARTMENT OF

AIRPORTS
Phone: (916) 806-5444
Email: [email protected]
ESA led a team to prepare an EA for a publicly accessible EV charging facility to be built on a 110+-acre parcel of land owned by the Sacramento International Airport (SMF). The facility would include EV charging stations powered by a new solar array and would serve shippers and transporters as well as public transportation and passenger vehicles.
5-Year Master Professional Services Contract for Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) 2026-2031 March 26, 2026
25 Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
763
Resumes
A
764
Eryn Brennan
Project Director
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Eryn is an urban planner and architectural historian with 15 years of experience preparing and developing environmental assessments for a range of mid- to large-scale development projects and masterplans, as well as assessing cultural resources. Her extensive project management experience, combined with her technical expertise in surveying and evaluating cultural resources, allows for seamless project facilitation through the environmental review process. Eryn has successfully managed dozens of projects through the environmental review process, and specializes in managing large, complex EIRs and CPEs with extensive technical teams in San Francisco and the Bay Area.

Eryn also has an in-depth knowledge and understanding of an array of cultural resources work, including field surveys, Historic American Building Survey (HABS) reports, and conducting Section 106 reviews to identify, assess, and mitigate potential impacts to historic resources. Eryn is a published author, former adjunct faculty member at the University of Virginia, and lecturer in the Stanford School of Continuing Studies.

Relevant Experience
Lake Tahoe Airport, Environmental Professional Services On-Call, City of South Lake Tahoe, CA. Project Director. Eryn is the Project Director for the Lake Tahoe Airport environmental professional services on-call. As project direct, Eryn supports the project manager in identifying the appropriate staff to assist with a variety of projects related to environmental planning for both CEQA and NEPA.

San Francisco International Airport, Planning and Environmental Services On-Call, San Francisco, CA. Project Director. Eryn is the client service manager for the SFO planning and environmental on-call and regularly coordinates a staff of approximately 140 people (including subconsultants) to develop and deliver myriad CEQA addenda, technical reports, permitting documents, and other services for SFO. As client service manager, Eryn immediately responds to requests regarding various ongoing and planned projects at the Airport and identifies the appropriate technical lead to support the effort.

SFO NEPA As-Needed Services Contract, San Francisco, CA. Project Manager. Eryn managed the NEPA as-needed contract as a subconsultant to Ricondo. Various tasks conducted under this contract included preparation of a Section 106 report and biological resources support for the Boarding Area H EA and preparation of Section 106 reports for various projects and the Noise Insulation Program.

San Francisco International Airport, Natural Resources Management On-Call, San Francisco County, CA. Project Director. Eryn is the Project Director for the Natural Resources Management On-Call for SFO. In this role, she supports three project managers that lead ESA’s teams providing services related to biological monitoring, regulatory permitting related to protection of the California red-legged frog and San Francisco garter snake, implementation of their wildlife hazards management program, and compensatory mitigation support.

EDUCATION
Master, Urban and
Environmental Planning,
University of Virginia
Master, Architectural
History and Certificate in
Historic Preservation,
University of Virginia
B.A., History, University of
California, Santa Cruz
18 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
American Planning
Association
Association of
Environmental
Professionals
765
Eryn Brennan (Continued)
Project Director
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
San Francisco International Airport, Shoreline Protection Program Project EIR, San Francisco, CA. Project Manager.

Eryn managed a complex EIR for SFO’s Shoreline Protection Program, which looks to armor the approximately 8-mile coastline around SFO in order to accommodate sea-level rise through end of century. As an architectural historian, Eryn is also leading the cultural resources team that will conduct the Section 106 work to support the NEPA document that will be prepared for the project. Eryn managed a team of more than 65 technical staff (including subconsultants) to develop complex technical analyses related to cultural resources, noise, air quality, biological resources, hydrology and water quality, and transportation.

San Francisco International Airport, Recommended Airport Development Plan EIR, San Francisco, CA. Project Manager. Eryn managed a complex EIR for SFO’s next long term masterplan—the Recommended Airport Development Plan—that will support the strategic development of the Airport over the next two decades. ESA managed the EIR for SFO’s previous 1989 masterplan (EIR certified in 1992), which served the continuous growth of the airport over the last 25 years. The current masterplan outlines critical strategies to improve the passenger experience, accommodate an estimated increase of 20 million air passengers, and plan for more sustainable and efficient ways to meet the state’s environmental goals. Eryn is overseeing the work of a large team of subcontractors, along with ESA’s in-house technical team.

Port of San Francisco, Waterfront Plan EIR, San Francisco, CA. Project Manager. Eryn managed the Port of San Francisco’s Waterfront Plan EIR, a programmatic EIR that analyzed policy amendments and updates to the Waterfront Land Use Plan—the governing policy document for the Port’s approximately 7.5-mile waterfront property. The updated Waterfront Plan focuses on advancing new goals and policies in the areas of waterfront resilience, environmental sustainability, financial strength, and continued public engagement.

Stonestown Development Project, San Francisco, CA. Project Director. The project would include up to approximately 2,930 residential units; up to 160,000 square feet of new retail; up to 200,000 square feet of office; up to approximately 100,000 square feet of hotel; approximately 53,000 square feet of cultural, institutional, and educational uses; approximately 4,000 parking spaces; 6 acres of open space; and infrastructure improvements. The EIR will analyze one variant to the project, which would include the development of the Authentic Church parcel. Under the Authentic Church Variant, the redevelopment of the 27 acres surrounding the Stonestown Galleria would be the same as the project; however, the Authentic Church parcel would be developed with an additional 150 residential units; 10,000 square feet of cultural, institutional, and educational uses; and 200 parking spaces.

San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department, Portsmouth Square Improvement Project, San Francisco, CA.

Project Director. Eryn served as the Project Director for Portsmouth Square Improvement Project EIR and subsequent mitigation monitoring and compliance work. The San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department will replace the existing park features with a redesigned public park that will include new playgrounds, exercise equipment, shade structures, wayfinding, signage, sidewalks, planters, terraces, ramps, and a 7,500 square foot new community clubhouse facility. The project will also waterproof the roof of the parking garage located underneath the park and remove the pedestrian bridge spanning Kearny Street that connects a 27-story hotel building with Portsmouth Square. 766
Patrick Hickman, PLA, AICP, LEED AP
Project Manager, Land Use & Planning, Airspace and GIS, Land Use & Planning, Airspace and GIS
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Patrick Hickman is a land use planner and landscape architect with ESA, providing expertise in airport land use compatibility planning, environmental analysis, GIS analysis and mapping, and site planning and design. His skills have been utilized throughout the United States and abroad on a variety of projects including airport land use compatibility plans, CEQA/NEPA environmental studies, airport master plans, and other planning efforts.

Relevant Experience
Lake Tahoe Airport, TVL TRPA/CEQA Documentation, South Lake Tahoe, CA. Project Manager. Patrick is currently managing preparation of the environmental documentation for the Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Update. Required environmental clearance documents include a CEQA Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration as well as an Initial Environmental Checklist in compliance with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) Code of Ordinances.

City of South Lake Tahoe, Airport Land Use Capability Plan, South Lake Tahoe, CA.

Land Use Planner. Patrick is assisting the Lake Tahoe Airport Land Use Commission with the update to the Lake Tahoe ALUCP. The ALUCP addresses compatible land use for areas around Lake Tahoe Airport. Patrick assisted in the production of compatibility factor maps delineating the geographic extent of the ALUCP policies.

Mather Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Sacramento, CA. Land Use Planner.

Patrick assisted with compatibility factor boundary delineation, including safety zones and the overflight notification area. He also assisted in the development of compatibility policy and criteria, including compatibility matrices drafted to correspond to the uses reflected in the plans and ordinances of local jurisdictions.

Bishop Airport Environmental Review Services, NEPA and CEQA Support, Bishop, CA.

Airport Planner. Patrick has served in multiple capacities supporting Inyo County Public Works for two separate environmental reviews for both NEPA and CEQA. Patrick served in a technical role in the preparation of an environmental assessment and an initial study evaluating environmental impacts related to the introduction of commercial service under 14 CFR Part 139, and he served as project manager while supporting preparation of an environmental assessment and initial study evaluating environmental impacts associated with runway safety area improvements.

Initial Study and Development Displacement Analysis for the Mather Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Sacramento, CA. Task Leader. Patrick prepared a development displacement analysis and Initial Study to fulfill CEQA requirements for the Mather Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The development displacement analysis measured the potential dwelling unit yield impacted for housing opportunity sites in the airport influence area. The analysis also entailed determining the amount of land area which

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Landscape
Architecture (BLA),
Mississippi State
University
Master of Urban and
Regional Planning (MURP)
— Cal Poly Pomona
17 YEARS OF

EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
Professional Landscape
Architect (PLA), CA, No.
5676
American Institute of
Certified Planners (AICP),
No. 025518
LEED Accredited
Professional (LEED AP), US
Green Building Council
767
Patrick Hickman, PLA, AICP, LEED AP (Continued)
Project Manager, Land Use & Planning, Airspace and GIS
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
would become unavailable to various non-residential land uses upon implementation of the ALUCP.

Humboldt County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Humboldt County, CA. Land Use Planner. Patrick assisted the Humboldt County Airport Land Use Commission with an update to the Humboldt County ALUCP. The ALUCP addresses compatible land use for areas around eight airports, including California-Redwood Coast-Humboldt Airport, Murray Field, Samoa Field Airport, Kneeland Airport, Rohnerville Airport, Dinsmore Airport, Garberville Airport, and Shelter Cove Airport. Patrick assisted with the development of the noise and safety compatibility factor policies and standards of the ALUCP.

San Carlos Airport, On-Call Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning Support, San Carlos, CA. Land Use Planner.

Patrick has assisted the San Mateo City/County Association of Governments in reviewing proposed development in the San Carlos Airport environs. He reviewed individual project proposals for consistency with existing ALUCP policies and criteria.

Amazon Prime Air, Environmental Assessments (EAs) for Commercial Drone Delivery, Various Locations. Airport Planner. ESA is currently assisting Amazon Prime Air to prepare EAs, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, so that they can secure Part 135 Operations Specification approval to conduct commercial drone delivery services. The scope of environmental analyses includes detailed assessments of potential impacts to biological resources, historic resources, noise and land use, Section 4(f) properties, and environmental justice communities.

Agency consultation efforts include a wide variety of state and federal regulatory agencies, including state and tribal historic preservation offices, FWS, and state coastal zone management agencies. Patrick developed initial methodologies for inventorying public lands per the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Section 4(f); historic resources; communities with environmental justice concerns; and other existing environmental conditions.

San Diego International Airport, Land Use Compatibility Plan, Environmental Impact Report, San Diego, CA. Task Leader. Patrick served in a lead technical role in conducting a development displacement analysis to determine potential land use and population and housing impacts in a densely urban environment resulting from implementation of the San Diego International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan published in 2014. He authored documentation detailing potential impacts to housing and population, public services, and local planning objectives.

San Diego International, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, San Diego, CA. Airport Planner. Patrick conducted research and analysis of local general plan policies and development regulations for the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). He developed methodology and utilized GIS and MS Excel software to perform analysis of existing land use density and intensity. Patrick participated in public workshops, steering committee meetings and local agency coordination meetings and provided on-call consistency review services for proposed projects with potential to conflict with ALUCP policies.

Pittsburgh International Airport Master Plan Update, Pittsburgh, PA. Airport Planner. In 2016, Patrick assisted with an update to the PIT Master Plan. Patrick developed a detailed database of existing land uses in the PIT environs and prepared noise exposure maps depicting baseline and future noise contours based on the master plan activity forecast.

Naval Air Station North Island, Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning, Coronado, CA. Land Use Planner. Patrick developed maps and prepared technical appendices supporting proposed land use policies and compatibility criteria for the environs of Naval Air Station North Island. He also prepared a work plan and conducted preliminary environmental analyses for the Draft ALUCP.
768
Steve Smith
Deputy Project Manager
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Steve is a seasoned and technically diverse environmental professional. Over his 20 years in the profession, Steve has managed and provided technical support for a multitude of CEQA and NEPA compliance documents, including initial studies, environmental impact reports, environmental assessments, and environmental impact statements. Steve has extensive experience leading and supporting the environmental compliance process for residential, commercial, mixed-use, infill, and infrastructure projects, including surface transportation, electrical, gas, and aviation projects. Steve also has extensive regulatory permitting experience, including preparation of permit applications for submittal to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for compliance with Clean Water Act Section 404, Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) for compliance with Clean Water Act Section 401, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for compliance with Fish and Game Code Sections 1602 and Section 2081. Steve is also a highly experienced cultural resources specialist. He conducts historical research and writing, historic built-environment surveys, archaeological field support, and preparation of cultural resources documentation for CEQA, NEPA, and Section 106 compliance.

Relevant Experience
City of South Lake Tahoe and Lake Tahoe Airport, TVL IS/MND, City of South Lake Tahoe, CA. CEQA Project Manager. The Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan identifies a series of improvements to the Lake Tahoe Airport that would occur over approximately a 20-year period to meet compliance with current FAA design standards, and accommodate existing and forecasted aviation demands. Implementation of the Airport Master Plan includes pavement marking and signage improvements, pavement reconstruction and rehabilitation, taxiway modifications, delineation of helicopter parking, removal of vegetation and other airspace obstructions, improvements to a drainage ditch, construction and/or expansion of new hangar and fixed-base operator facilities, demolition and removal of an existing air traffic control tower, installation of improved navigational instruments, and installation of a self-serve fueling station, aircraft wash rack, and electric vehicle charging stations. ESA assisted the City of South Lake Tahoe with preparation of an Initial Study to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the proposed project in compliance with CEQA. Based upon the findings contained in the Initial Study, it was determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment, based on mitigation measures that would be attached to the project as conditions of approval. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project.

Rio Vista Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan CEQA Categorical Exemption Technical Memo, Rio Vista, CA. Technical Analyst. The Rio Vista Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan is intended to promote compatibility between the functions and operations of the Rio Vista Airport and the land uses surrounding the Airport. The Rio Vista Airport ALUCP included proposed land use policies and criteria for implementation by local agencies and did not propose or entail any new development, construction, or changes to existing land

EDUCATION
M.A., History, California
State University,
Sacramento
B.A., History, Humboldt
State University
25 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Association of
Environmental
Professionals
769
Steve Smith (Continued)
Deputy Project Manager
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
uses or the environment. No physical construction would result from the adoption of the proposed ALUCP or from subsequent implementation of the ALUCP by local agencies. Similarly, no change in airport facilities or aircraft or airport operations would result with implementation of the ALUCP. Accordingly, Steve prepared a technical memorandum that supported the proposed ALUCP’s exemption from the provisions of CEQA.

Westover Field Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan CEQA Categorical Exemption Technical Memo, Amador County, CA. Technical Analyst. The proposed Westover Field Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan is intended to promote compatibility between the functions and operations of Amador County Airport (i.e., Westover Field) and the land uses surrounding the Airport. The draft ALUCP included proposed land use policies and criteria for implementation by local agencies and did not propose or entail any new development, construction, or changes to existing land uses or the environment. No physical construction would result from the adoption of the proposed ALUCP or from subsequent implementation of the ALUCP by local agencies. Similarly, no change in airport facilities or aircraft or airport operations would result with implementation of the ALUCP. Accordingly, Steve prepared a technical memorandum that supported the proposed ALUCP’s exemption from the provisions of CEQA.

County of Marin, Donahue Highlands Master Plan, Marin County, CA. Technical Analyst. The applicant proposes to construct 18 residences on a ridgeline overlooking the City of Sausalito. The site lies adjacent to the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. ESA’s scope has also included preparation of a comprehensive constraints analysis prior to initiation of the EIR, covering topics such as aesthetics, biological and cultural resources, geology and soils (landslides), hydrology, and traffic. The project is uniquely controversial, as it would develop one of the last remaining ridgelines in southern Marin County. Steve assisted in the preparation of the environmental constrains analysis for the project and is the lead author for the land use and aesthetics section of the EIR.

San Bernardino International Airport, Eastgate Air Cargo Facility, San Bernardino County, CA. Deputy Project Manager. The San Bernardino International Airport Authority (SBIAA) is proposing to develop the Eastgate Air Cargo Facility, a package sorting and distribution center with an air cargo hub that would satisfy an unmet need for large-scale air cargo facilities at the airport. Approval and implementation of the proposed project requires one or more actions by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), requiring environmental analysis, coordination, and documentation conforming to the provisions of NEPA and the federal Clean Air Act. ESA is assisting the SBIAA and the FAA with preparation of an EA for the project’s NEPA compliance, as well as an air quality analysis to support a finding that the proposed project conforms to the air quality management plan established in the state implementation plan.

Air Cargo Facility at March Inland Port, Riverside County, CA. Technical Analyst. The March Joint Powers Authority was the CEQA lead agency for the proposed reuse of a former DHL air cargo facility at March Inland Port for resumed operations under a new operator. ESA prepared an initial study to evaluate the environmental effects of the proposed project in support of an addendum to the previously adopted mitigated negative declaration prepared for the DHL facility. Key environmental issues included aircraft-generated noise and air emissions and truck traffic. Steve was a key technical analyst for preparation of the addendum.
770
Michael Arnold, LEED AP
Strategic Advisor
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Mike has more than 35 years of aviation planning, noise, and environmental project experience at more than 130 domestic and international airports. He has prepared longterm master development programs for more than 25 airports and has assisted private operators develop capital programs and revenue enhancement strategies for airport privatization pursuits on four continents. Mike has prepared numerous forecasts, facility requirements and alternatives analyses, project definition/justification studies, and has participated in airport/aircraft compatibility analyses for more than 60 airports. He has managed and participated in several complex environmental studies for a wide range of projects including new runways, new terminal configurations, and major airfield reconfigurations. Mike is an active leader in the aviation industry and regularly speaks and facilitates discussions on a wide variety of industry issues including sustainability/“green airports,” land use compatibility, forecasting, integration of planning and environmental processes, and the changing needs of airport planning.

Relevant Experience
Miami International Airport NEPA and Noise Support, Miami, FL. Technical Analyst. Led various technical analyses related to changes in arrival and departure procedures including changes in flight tracks, changes in direction of flow, and the use of runway displacements. Also evaluated flight procedure changes associated with the Central South Florida Metroplex procedures. Conducted numerous airspace, noise studies and NEPA analyses for MIA, OPF and TMB.

San Bernardino International Airport Environmental Assessment, Eastgate Air Cargo Facility, San Bernardino County, CA. Project Director. The San Bernardino International Airport Authority proposed developing the Eastgate Air Cargo Facility, a package sorting and distribution center with an air cargo hub that will satisfy an unmet need for largescale air cargo facilities at the airport. ESA prepared an environmental assessment and air quality analysis to support a finding that the proposed project conforms to the air quality management plan established in the state implementation plan.

Santa Maria Public Airport Master Plan Update NEPA/CEQA Documentation, Santa Maria, CA. Role. ESA prepared NEPA/CEQA documentation in support of the Santa Maria Public Airport Master Plan Update and provided supplemental airport planning services to refine the recommended development plan. These services included providing the justification for various project components and identifying alternatives for meeting the purpose and need of the proposed action. The primary components of the Master Plan Update included the extension of the main air carrier runway, various taxiway improvements, and the development of hangars and general aviation facilities on the south side of the airport. Key environmental issues analyzed included natural resources, noise, air quality, land use compatibility, and surface transportation/traffic. The EA received a Findings of No Significant Impact from the FAA in June 2010. The EIR was

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
Michigan State University
35 YEARS OF

EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATIONS
Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design
Accredited Professional,
U.S. Green Building
Council, #10256411, 2011

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Airport Consultants
Council
Airport Consultants
Council Board of Directors
(2008–2012)
Airports Council
International – North
America
Airports Council
International – North
America Operations and
Technical Affairs
Committee Steering
Group (2007–2009)
American Association of
Airport Executives
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Broward College Aviation
Institute Advisory
Committee
Florida Airports Council
771
Michael Arnold, LEED AP (Continued)
Strategic Advisor
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
certified by the Airport Board in September 2010. The runway and taxiway extension opened for use in May 2012. (Coordination with USFWS, USACE, FAA, CDFG, SHPO, and Caltrans.) St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport Master Plan EA, Pinellas County, FL. Technical Analyst. Led all planning analyses in conjunction with the preparation of NEPA documentation for the Airport Master Plan for Pinellas County, Florida. Airside projects include the extension of a runway, development of a new runway, and development of new taxiways. Landside projects include improvements to the existing terminal building, development of new air cargo facilities, and development of additional general aviation facilities. Planning efforts include a new runway siting study, update of activity forecasts and a benefit/cost assessment for the new parallel runway.

St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport New Parallel Runway Environmental Assessment, Clearwater, FL.

Project Manager. Mike led several planning analyses in conjunction with the preparation of NEPA documentation for the airport master plan for Pinellas County, FL. Airside projects included the extension of a runway, development of a new runway, and development of new taxiways. Landside projects included improvements to the existing terminal building, development of new air cargo facilities, and development of additional general aviation facilities. Planning efforts included a new runway siting study, update of activity forecasts, and a benefit/cost assessment for the new parallel runway.

Southwest Florida International Airport Master Plan Update and NEPA Re-evaluation, Ft. Myers, FL. Project Director.

Mike led all aspects of the master plan update for Southwest Florida International Airport in Ft. Myers, FL. The plan incorporated the proposed midfield terminal complex, a second parallel air carrier runway, and all support facilities (new airport traffic control tower, aircraft rescue and firefighting, cargo) through the 20-year development period. A primary consideration of the Master Plan Update was maximizing airport revenues through both aviation-related and nonaviation commercial development. Mike also led the NEPA process to re-evaluate the prior EA completed for the terminal to ensure FAA’s findings and determination remained accurate.

Lakeland Linder Regional Airport, Various Projects, Lakeland, FL. Project Director. Mike has overseen and supported a series of projects at Lakeland Linder Regional Airport (LAL) including NEPA documentation for an Instrument Landing System relocation, a new ATCT EA and a new MRO/Cargo facility, among others. Non NEPA projects include a Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Management Plan and the environmental elements of the ongoing master plan update.

Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Part 150 Study Update, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Project Manager.

Mike is overseeing all aspects of the Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 150 noise and land use compatibility study for Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. The study evaluates the new operational conditions at the airport stemming from reconstruction and expansion of the south parallel runway. This controversial project resulted in operational changes that affect not only the communities near the ends of the new runway but also those near the existing runway. Measures include noise abatement strategies, a new sound insulation program, and numerous programmatic measures The project is one of the largest noise studies ever undertaken in the southeast U.S. SF330:
w/Firm; $2.5M; 7/2016–12/2022_N/A
772
Chris Dugan
Air Quality and Noise
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Chris Dugan has more than 20 years’ experience resolving environmental noise and air quality challenges for public and private clients. Chris plans and manages technical data collection efforts, evaluates changing ambient noise and vibration and air quality conditions, and works with designers, developers, municipal staff, and community members to attain clean air standards and create local noise environments that meet general plan guidelines, zoning standards, and quality of life expectations.

Relevant Experience
Goodman North America, Commerce Center Master Plan Building 1 Project Construction Noise Monitoring, Long Beach, CA. Lead Noise Analyst. Chris prepared the construction noise management plan, led construction noise monitoring activities at noise-sensitive land uses, including nighttime noise monitoring, and conducted plan review services for compliance with condition use permit requirements. The CNMP and noise monitoring needed to address cumulative noise levels from construction and Long Beach Airport operations, with monitoring required to distinguish construction activity noise levels from airport-related noise levels.

San Mateo County, Government Center Campus Development Project EIR, Construction Noise Barrier Recommendation, and Construction Noise Monitoring, Redwood City, CA. Lead Noise Analyst. Chris oversaw preparation of CEQA noise and vibration analyses for the new County Government Center Building. Chris developed construction noise barrier design recommendations to reduce construction noise levels at adjacent residential and school receptor locations and developed, implemented, and managed a construction noise monitoring program to verify effectiveness of barrier design and CEQA mitigation.

WSP/Caltrain, San Mateo Setout Track Noise and Vibration Monitoring, San Mateo, CA. Project Manager/Lead Noise Analyst. In 2024, the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB) and Caltrain completed the installation of new gravel access road, setout track, and screening wall in San Mateo. The installation of the setout track required new track infrastructure to enable rail vehicles to move from the main track to the setout track, which resulted in a change to the existing noise and vibration environment in the vicinity of the track. Chris developed and managed a noise and vibration monitoring plan designed to measure noise and vibration levels associated with train travel over the new track infrastructure.

WSP/Caltrain, Guadalupe Bridge Replacement Project, San Jose, CA. Lead Noise Analyst. In 2023, the PCJPB and Caltrain began replacing an existing railroad bridge over Guadalupe Creek to address seismic deficiencies. Chris developed and managed the preparation of a construction noise management plan in accordance with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program requirements, collecting daytime and nighttime noise

EDUCATION
BS, Natural Resource
Management, cum Laude,
Rutgers University
20 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE
773
Chris Dugan (Continued)
Air Quality and Noise
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
levels from grading, pile driving, and other construction activities to confirm compliance with construction noise performance standards and wildlife agency requirements for special-status species protections.

Hillside Church, New Gathering Plaza and Playground Project, San Jose, CA. Lead Noise Analyst. Hillside Church proposed the expansion of existing gathering and playground areas near residential receptors. Chris managed the preparation of a Noise Impact Report that evaluated the noise impacts at residential receptors in accordance with City requirements. Chris successfully demonstrated that existing noise levels exceeded the City standards and demonstrated the project would not result in a substantial change in ambient noise levels at sensitive receptor locations, supporting project approval.

Mount Shasta City-wide Noise Study, Noise Element Update, and Noise Ordinance Update, Mount Shasta, CA. Lead Noise Analyst. Chris provided technical noise consulting services to the City of Mount Shasta in support of a General Plan Noise Element update and new Noise Ordinance. Chris designed and led community noise surveys, coordinated with City staff and traffic subconsultants on traffic noise data collection, managed traffic noise modeling for the General Plan update, and prepared a report on City-wide noise conditions that supported an updated General Plan Noise Element and a new City Noise Ordinance.

City of Santa Clara, Patrick Henry Drive Specific Plan EIR, Santa Clara, CA. Lead Noise Analyst. Chris oversaw the preparation of CEQA noise and vibration analyses for this 74-acre specific plan that proposed up to 12,000 new residential units and 785,000 square feet of office space near existing residential and educational land uses. Chris identified program-level mitigation to reduce construction noise levels from specific plan development. The EIR analysis included traffic noise modeling for more than 150 road segments.

City of Palo Alto, Palo Alto Public Safety Building EIR, Palo Alto, CA. Lead Noise Analyst. Chris developed, implemented, and managed noise monitoring and impact analysis methodology for a public safety facility (i.e., police and emergency services headquarters) and parking garage involving vehicle activity sirens, and a large back-up generator.

California State Parks, Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division, Oceano Dunes SVRA Pismocean Music Festival IS/MND and Special Event Monitoring, San Luis Obispo County, CA. Project Manager/Lead Noise Analyst. Chris prepared the CEQA IS/MND analysis of potential noise impacts from special event activities, and subsequently developed the noise monitoring program to measure special event sound levels at SVRA boundary and sensitive receptor locations.

The monitoring program also evaluated ambient OHV noise levels and meteorological and tidal influences on measured sound levels. The results of the monitoring were used to prepare a set of recommendations for limiting special event noise levels at Oceano Dunes SVRA.
774
Dominic Scarano
Air Quality and Noise (Aviation)
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Dominic has more than 9 years of experience in modeling aviation noise and air quality.

Dominic has worked on over 30 domestic and international airports supporting the needs of the client and community. He has advanced knowledge of aviation practices and environmental concepts of aircraft noise and air quality modeling. Dominic has served as technical lead, project manager, quality control manager, noise, and air quality modeler on a variety of projects. He has experience with many types of projects, including Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Environmental Assessments (EAs), Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs), Noise Compatibility Programs (NCPs), Voluntary Airport Low Emissions (VALE) Programs, and various special studies in aviation, air quality, and residential sound insulation projects. He is an expert user of regulatory software and industry standard programs including the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT), Microsoft SQL, and ESRI ArcGIS.

Relevant Experience
Sacramento County – Department of Community Development, Planning, and Environmental Review, Sacramento County/Sacramento International Airport (SMF) WattEV Commercial Charging Center, Sacramento, CA. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documentation/Project and Technical Support Specialist responsible for assisting with preparation of NEPA documentation as well as air quality technical support.

Napa County, 2025 Baseline Data Report, Napa County, CA. Noise Modeler. The Baseline Data Report (BDR) intends to catalog and assess baseline environmental conditions throughout Napa County on various resource topics. ESA is providing full planning and implementation support for this project, from data-gathering to report and application development for public viewing. This includes preparing administrative draft Baseline Data Report (BDR) chapters designed to support the County’s General Plan Update and associated EIR. Dominic is providing airport noise services for this project.

City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport (SFO), SFO AsNeeded California Environmental Quality Act Services, San Francisco, CA. Project Support Specialist responsible for overall project support and data analysis.

City of Los Angeles – Airports, Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Preferential Runway Policy Report Update, Los Angeles, CA. Deputy Project Manager. ESA developed an update to the LAX Preferential Runway Policy Report, which details the LAX Preferential Runway Use Policy and provides an analysis of operator’s compliance with the Policy.

Dominic led the collection of flight track data and completed the data analysis effort required for the updated report.

Naples Airport Authority, Naples Municipal Airport (APF) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150 Study, Naples, FL. Noise Modeler. ESA is preparing a CFR Part 150 study to address noise concerns in the vicinity of the airport. This study includes an extensive noise modeling effort, including supplemental metrics and tasks outside of the CFR Part 150

EDUCATION
BS, Environmental
Science, Concentration in
Atmospheric Science,
University of
Massachusetts, Lowell,
9 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
775
Dominic Scarano (Continued)
Air Quality and Noise (Aviation)
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
requirements. Dominic has assisted with various technical analyses and the development of the Naples Airport Noise Compatibility Program document and supporting public outreach materials. • APF Task 26 -CY2022 Noise Stage Update, Naples, FL. Technical Lead responsible for leading technical analysis.
• APF Task 29 - APF FSFQ Program Update, Naples, FL. Project and Technical Support Specialist responsible for project and technical support; assisting with preparation of documentation. • APF Task 32 - Additional Noise Support, Naples, FL. Project and Technical Support Specialist responsible for general project and technical support.
• APF Task 34 - Additional Noise Support, Naples, FL. Project and Technical Support Specialist responsible for general project and technical support.

Port of Oakland, Terminal Development Project for Oakland International Airport (OAK), Oakland, CA. Noise Modeling, Data Processing, Technical Analysis Specialist.

City of San Jose, San Jose Mineta International Airport (SJC) Voluntary Airport Low Emissions (VALE) Program Emissions Modeling, San Jose, CA. Project Manager.

Inyo County, Eastern Sierra Regional Airport (BIH) Runway Safety Area Environmental Assessment (EA), Bishop, CA. Air Quality Modeling Lead. ESA is assisting the County of Inyo with the preparation of an EA for the construction of a new Runway Safety Area at BIH. Dominic led the development and modeling of an operational emissions and greenhouse gas inventories for the EA.

Broward County – Aviation Department, WA ESA-05 Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL) Landside Projects Environmental Assessment, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Project Support Specialist responsible for assisting with preparation of NEPA documentation.

City of Chicago, Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Reevaluation, Chicago, IL. Noise Modeling, Data Processing, Technical Analysis Specialist.

City of Austin, Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS) Environmental Assessment, Austin, TX. Noise and Air Quality Modeling Lead. Dominic led noise and air quality modeling efforts for an Environmental Assessment at AUS in support of airfield improvements. Dominic prepared noise contours and operational emissions inventories for each scenario of the Environmental Assessment and assisted with the preparation of technical documentation.

Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, Airport Master Plan Update Noise Analysis at Roanoke-Blacksburg Regional Airport (ROA), Roanoke, VA. Assistant Project Manager/Noise Modeling Lead. Dominic served as the noise modeling lead and assistant project manager for this project. Dominic oversaw the noise modeling effort for the ROA master plan and prepared noise exposure contours for each forecast scenario of the master plan. Dominic also assisted with the preparation of master plan technical noise documentation. 776
Matthew Russell, PhD, RPA
Cultural Resources – Archaeology
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Matt Russell has more than 31 years of experience in archaeology and has a wide range of experience in pre-contact and historical archaeology in the United States and abroad, with more than 25 years managing large and complex projects in both the private and public sectors. Matt is a specialist in maritime archaeology, and has participated in or directed more than 50 archaeology projects for state, federal and international agencies both on land and underwater since 1993. He has written numerous articles, book chapters, and monographs, and has edited several books. Matt has been a member of the Register of Professional Archaeologists since 2005. At ESA since 2014, Matt currently serves as Regional Business Group Director, managing a team of archaeologists and architectural historians that conduct pre-contact, historical, and maritime archaeological technical studies. Matt has conducted and/or managed more than 90 technical studies and impact assessments for compliance with federal and state laws including NHPA Section 106 and CEQA while at ESA.

ESA Experience
San Francisco International Airport (SFO), Taxiway Improvements Project, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist, ESA. ESA prepared an Archaeological Survey Report to support Section 106 compliance. Matt was responsible for overseeing preparation of the report and overall Section 106 management.

San Francisco International Airport (SFO), Shoreline Protection Program, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist, ESA. ESA is coordinating Section 106 compliance for the Program. Matt was responsible for overseeing preparation of technical reports and overall Section 106 management.

Pioneer Law Group, LLP, Sacramento Entertainment and Sports Center & Related Development, Sacramento, CA. Senior Archaeologist. Matt helped produce an archaeological sensitivity training video for construction workers participating in construction the new Sacramento Kings arena in downtown Sacramento, California.

SFPUC Sunol Wilderness/EBRPD Project, Sunol, CA. Project Manager/Senior Archaeologist. ESA prepared an archaeological testing program for the SFPUC Sunol Wilderness/EBRPD Project in Sunol, California. Matt was responsible for preparing the ATP and for implementing archaeological testing on the project site.

Associate Capital, Potrero Power Station Mixed-Use Development Project EIR and Archeological Testing, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist. ESA prepared an Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment to support the Project EIR, as well as the cultural EIR section Matt was responsible for preparing the Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment and supervising preparation of the EIR section. In addition, ESA prepared and implemented an ATP for the project’s mitigation phase.

EDUCATION
PhD, Anthropology
(Archaeology Program),
University of California,
Berkeley
MA, Anthropology
(Archaeology Program),
University of California,
Berkeley
MA, Nautical Archaeology
and Maritime History, East
Carolina University
BA, Anthropology
(Archaeology Emphasis),
University of California,
Santa Barbara
30 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
Register of Professional
Archaeologists
24-Hour Hazardous Waste
Operations and
Emergency Response,
2012

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Society for Historical
Archaeology (Board of
Directors, 2008-2010)
Advisory Council on
Underwater Archaeology
(2002-2010; Chair, 2008-
2010)
Society for California
Archaeology
777
Matthew Russell, PhD, RPA (Continued)
Cultural Resources – Archaeology
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Kilroy Realty, Flower Mart Development Project, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist. ESA prepared an ARDTP for the Flower Mart Development Project in San Francisco, California. Matt was responsible for preparing the ARDTP for the San Francisco Planning Department.

SFPUC, Southeast Plant Biodigester Facilities Project EIR, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist. Matt provided archaeological analysis for the San Francisco Southeast Plant Biodigester Facilities Project. ESA teamed with Far Western Anthropological Group, Inc. to prepare an ARDTP for the project, in support of CEQA/NEPA review. ESA also provided preconstruction and construction-related archaeological testing and monitoring at the project site.

SFPUC, Westside Recycled Water Project EIR, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist. Matt provided archaeological analysis for the San Francisco Westside Recycled Water Project, which includes recycled water treatment, storage, and distribution facilities for users located on the west side of San Francisco. The project included Section 106 consultation and preparing an Archaeological Resources Management Plan to satisfy SHPO requirements. ESA also provided archaeological testing for project components within the former San Francisco City Cemetery.

SFPUC Fort Mason Geoarchaeological Testing Project, San Francisco, CA. Project Manager/Senior Archaeologist. ESA prepared an archaeological testing program for the SFPUC Fort Mason Project in San Francisco, California. Matt was responsible for preparing the ATP and for implementing archaeological testing on the project site.

Port of San Francisco, Mission Bay Ferry Landing and Water Taxi Landing Project, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist. ESA prepared an Extended (Subsurface) Archaeological Survey Plan, conducted subsurface testing, and final reporting for the Mission Bay Ferry Landing and Water Taxi Landing Project to support CEQA and Section 106 compliance. Matt was responsible for overseeing preparation of the reports and overall Section 106 management.

Golden State Warriors Arena, LLC, Event Center & Mixed-Use Development at Mission Bay Blocks 29-32 SEIR (Golden State Warriors Arena), San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist. ESA prepared an archaeological testing program for the Golden State Warriors Event Center at Mission Bay Blocks 29-32 in San Francisco’s Mission Bay waterfront. Matt was responsible for preparing the ATP and managing and coordinating the implementation of the testing program. In addition, as the result of an unanticipated discovery, ESA prepared an Archaeological Monitoring Plan and conducted archaeological monitoring during construction and prepared a Final Archaeological Resources Report and Archaeological Interpretation Plan for the discovered resource, a historic rail car.

California High Speed Rail Authority, California High Speed Rail Merced to Fresno Construction Package 1, Central Valley, CA. Senior Archaeologist. As a subconsultant to the Tutor Perini Zachary Parsons (TPZP) Joint Venture, ESA is providing environmental compliance support services for the Merced to Fresno Construction Package 1 (CP1) segment of the California High Speed Rail project. Tasks included conducting pre-construction surveys for cultural resources, compliance monitoring during construction, and compliance tracking and reporting. Approximately 29 miles in length, CP1 includes cultural resources such as the historic Chinatown in downtown Fresno. Matt is managing ESA’s overall cultural resources role in the project, including coordinating and managing Section 106 compliance, archaeological surveys and monitoring of various preconstruction activities between Madera and Fresno. 778
Heidi Koenig
Cultural Resources - Archaeology
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Heidi Koenig is a Registered Professional Archaeologist specializing in California archaeology and compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Her experience includes over 20 years of conducting cultural resources identification efforts, significance evaluations, development of environmental documentation, implementation programs, and consultation support with the State Historic Preservation Officer. Heidi has developed Geographic Information System databases to assist regulatory agencies with cultural resources management and preservation decisions. Heidi has a proficient understanding of the regulatory framework guiding cultural resources management and has extensive experience in conducting environmental work for all types of infrastructure projects, including development, transportation, water, and energy projects. Her experience includes working with many federal, State, and local agencies, as well as numerous Native American tribes and Tribal Historic Preservation Officers Relevant Experience
WattEV Innovative Freight Terminal (SWIFT) Project EIR. Cultural Resources Analyst.

Serving as Cultural Resources Analyst, Heidi and ESA prepared an EIR that evaluated the environmental effects of a publicly accessible Electric Vehicle (EV) charging facility to be bult on a 110-acre parcel of land south of the Sacramento International Airport (SMF). The facility would include Direct Current Fast Chargers and Megawatt Chargers powered by a new solar array and would serve shippers and transporters as well as public transportation and passenger vehicles. The charging stations along with three accessory structures providing services to the traveling public (i.e., convenience store, resting lounge, restrooms, etc.) would be located on the northern 13.5 acres of the project site while the solar array would be located on the remaining 96.5 acres of the site to the south.

As the project site is located on land controlled by SMF, the analysis in the EIR tiered from the analysis found in the Supplemental EIR for 2022 Airport Master Plan Update. Principal issues addressed in the EIR include potential impacts to agricultural resources (loss of important farmland) and biological resources (harm to special-status species [i.e., Swainson’s Hawk and Giant Garter Snake] and conflicts with the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan). The EIR was certified in May 2024 on an expedited schedule.

San Francisco International Airport (SFO), Shoreline Protection Program, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist, ESA. ESA is coordinating Section 106 compliance for the Program. Heidi is responsible for overseeing preparation of technical reports and overall Section 106 management.

Port of San Francisco, Mission Bay Ferry Landing and Water Taxi Landing, San Francisco, CA. Senior Archaeologist. Heidi directed the cultural resources analysis for a ferry landing and water taxi landing construction project in the Mission Bay neighborhood PHONE: 415.896.5900

EDUCATION
M.A., Cultural Resources
Management, Sonoma
State University
B.A., Anthropology, San
Francisco State University
20 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
Register of Professional
Archaeologists (RPA),
15140
Hazardous Waste
Operations and
Emergency Response
40 hour course
completion and active
renewal

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Society for California
Archaeology
Society for Historical
Archaeology
779
Heidi Koenig (Continued)
Cultural Resources - Archaeology
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
of San Francisco. Work was conducted in support of permitting and CEQA compliance, with the City and County of San Francisco Planning Department as the lead reviewing agency.

Linda Creek Sewer Crossing Rehab Project, Roseville, Placer County, CA. Archaeologist. Heidi prepared the cultural resources section for the Section 404 permit application from the Army Corps of Engineers. The Linda Creek Sewer Crossing is located in Roseville, Placer County and consists of the construction of four new sewer crossings on Dry and Linda Creeks. Heidi conducted a records search, consulted with interested Native American organizations and tribes, performed an intensive field survey, updated the location map of a 1860s railroad grade, and evaluated the grade as not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.

Town of Truckee, Church Street Extension Truckee Railyard, Nevada County, CA. Archaeologist. Heidi completed the cultural resources study for the development of a 34-acre parcel adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad east of downtown Truckee. The study included background research at the North Central Information Center and development of a memorandum for consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer. The finding for the project was No Historic Properties Affected.

Napa River Rutherford Reach, Napa County, CA. Archaeologist. Heidi prepared the archaeological study for this river restoration project. The analysis included a records search at the Northwest Information Center and a surface survey.

Background research indicated a large prehistoric site was within the proposed work area. In consultation with the project proponent and engineers, Heidi worked to reduce impacts to this significant site by redesigning the project. Heidi also completed a subsurface investigation to confirm that site components were not in other proposed work areas.

Archaeological monitoring was completed during project construction to further identify and protect cultural resources.

The project was completed in coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for National Historic Preservation Act compliance.

Watson Ranch Specific Plan, City of American Canyon, Napa County, CA. Archaeologist. Heidi completed an archaeological resources study for this 300-acre development project, including a records search at the Northwest Information Center and a pedestrian survey of the project area. Given the environmental setting, the relative distance of most of the Plan area from the nearest perennial water source (a small tributary to American Canyon Creek), and the paucity of any nearby prehistoric archaeological sites in a similar setting, Heidi recommended that a low archaeological sensitivity of the Plan area.

Inn at the Abbey EIR, Napa, CA. Archaeologist. Heidi is serving as archaeologist on an ESA team preparing an EIR for development of a 79-room hotel in multiple buildings on a 15-acre site owned by Jackson Family Vineyards north of St.

Helena in unincorporated Napa County. The project would preserve an existing stone building (currently a winery/restaurant) and demolish other structures on the site with the exception of six residential dwelling units, which would be used for employee housing.
780
Mandi McElroy
FAA-Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Mandi is a senior wildlife biologist and project manager at ESA with 20 years of experience in wildlife surveys and monitoring. She has worked as an environmental consultant in California since 2009 and became a FAA-Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist in 2016 after conducting wildlife hazard assessments and authoring FAA-approved wildlife hazard management plans for two airports. She specializes in the identification and life history of birds, bats, and small mammals of California. As a project manager and technical lead on multiple biological compliance projects, Mandi’s skills include conducting habitat assessments and protocol-level surveys, advising clients on management strategies for nesting birds and other wildlife, and analyzing impacts to wildlife for NEPA and CEQA compliance.

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) Wildlife Hazard Management Support. Airport Wildlife Biologist. Mandi is supporting SFO’s wildlife hazard management program by conducting ongoing bi-monthly wildlife monitoring surveys and advising on nesting bird and special-status species management, habitat modification, hazing and deterrents. She assesses triggering strikes and drafts the reports to FAA, leads the annual Operations personnel training, leads the monthly wildlife hazard committee meeting, and conducts the annual review of the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan.

Port of Oakland, Oakland International Airport (OAK) Environmental On-Call Services. Lead Biologist. Mandi is leading a team of biologists conducting compliance monitoring on the OAK airfield, which includes protocol-level surveys for western burrowing owl and routine nesting bird surveys. She coordinates with OAK’s in-house USDA-APHIS biologists on wildlife issues to ensure continued compliance with project biological avoidance and mitigation measures.

Westervelt Ecological Services, Wildlife Hazard Analysis, Solano County, CA. Airport Wildlife Biologist. Mandi conducted a wildlife hazard analysis for the development of Cache Slough Mitigation Bank, in accordance with airport land use compatibility plans for Travis Air Force Base and Rio Vista Municipal Airport. She reviewed and analyzed wildlife survey data and met with airport staff and land use commission members. Mandi authored a report summarizing survey findings, analyzed potential wildlife hazards associated with the proposed land use change, and recommended measures to minimize potential hazards.

American Samoa Department of Port Administration, Wildlife Hazard Assessments and Wildlife Hazard Management Plans, Fitiuta and Ofu, American Samoa. Airport Wildlife Biologist. Conducted 12-month wildlife hazard assessments at two airports in remote location, overseen and reviewed by a senior FAA-Qualified biologist. Trained airport staff to conduct surveys, identify potential hazards and wildlife attractants, and implement deterrents. Authored FAA-approved wildlife hazard management plans for both airports.

Buzz Oates Construction, Wildlife Hazard Assessments for Multiple Development Projects and Mitigation Sites, various locations, CA. Project Manager and Lead Biologist.

EDUCATION
M.S., Wildlife Ecology and
Management, University
of Georgia
B.S., Wildlife Biology,
University of Georgia
20 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS
FAA-Qualified Airport
Wildlife Biologist
First Aid/CPR
ATV Safety

TRAININGS
Advanced FAA Wildlife
Hazard Assessment (2011)
FAA Wildlife Hazard
Assessment (2010)
Bat Ecology and Field
Techniques (2017)
San Joaquin Kit Fox
Workshop (2013)
Remote Camera Trapping
Workshop (2013)
Rare Pond Species Survey
Techniques (2011)

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Bird Strike Committee
USA
The Wildlife Society
(President of SF Bay Area
Chapter 2014-2015;
Executive Board Member
of Western Section 2013-
2016)
781
Mandi McElroy (Continued)
FAA-Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Advising client on potential wildlife strike hazards resulting from multiple development projects and associated wetland mitigation plans in the vicinity of Travis Air Force Base and Napa County Airport. Assigning qualified biologists to conduct reconnaissance-level surveys and habitat assessments of project sites. Reviewing survey data and assessing whether project activities will potentially increase presence of birds and other wildlife within flight paths.

East Bay Regional Park District, Biological Compliance for Fuels Management Program, various East Bay parks, CA.

Project Manager and Lead Biologist. Provided pre- and post-treatment assessments and biological monitoring for activities conducted under the Park District’s Wildfire Hazard Reduction and Resource Management Plan, encompassing fourteen East Bay hills and shoreline parks from Point Pinole Regional Shoreline to Anthony Chabot Regional Park. Led a team of biologists and subcontractors to provide project oversight to protect biological resources, conduct environmental assessments and surveys pre- and post- work, provide and coordinate agency approvals of Designated Biologists, coordinate projects with Park District fuel program representatives, and provide assessments, reports, and work updates in a timely manner. Assisted with staffing and providing technical expertise on restoration projects, routine maintenance work and other projects needing regulatory permits, on an intermittent/emergency basis.

Chevron Richmond Refinery, Osprey Nest Management, Richmond, CA. Wildlife Biologist. Conducted surveys and monitoring on oil and gas refinery sites to assess existing level of osprey activity, manage active nests, and provide recommendations for nest deterrents and artificial nest platforms. Met regularly with client, legal team, and CDFW to develop long-term management strategies.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Wildfire Risk Mitigation Programs - Environmental Support, Mt. Diablo State Park, CA and other locations. Project Manager/Wildlife Biologist. Worked closely with client and large team of field biologists to support PG&E’s Wildfire System Hardening Program. Staffed biological monitors, wetland scientists, and botanists to conduct surveys and monitoring. Species of concern included rare plants, reptiles and amphibians, and nesting birds including bald and golden eagles. Advised on avoidance buffers and other measures. Reviewed biological constraints reports for projects throughout California.

California American Water, Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project, Monterey, CA. Wildlife Biologist. Conducted field surveys and habitat mapping for species including bats, western burrowing owl, California tiger salamander, and California red-legged frog. Authored wildlife sections of the technical report.

Save Mount Diablo, Morgan Fire Research Project, Mount Diablo State Park, CA. Wildlife Biologist. Conducted habitat assessments, small mammal trapping, spotlight surveys, and remote camera trapping within four different habitat types (burned and control sites) to assess wildlife response to post-fire conditions. Received competitive grant from Save Mount Diablo to expand and continue remote camera and small mammal trapping. 782
Brian Pittman, CWB
Biological Resources
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Brian is a Certified Wildlife Biologist with 26 years of practice leading projects with complex regulatory, mitigation, and construction/environmental compliance backgrounds. He is fluent with biological resources characterization and management throughout California and routinely coordinates with scientists, planners, and resource agency staff to identify and resolve issues affecting sensitive or regulated resources. Brian is trained in the permitting procedures and requirements under CEQA, NEPA, the federal and California Endangered Species Act(s), California Fish & Game Code, and federal and California Clean Water Acts. He holds a 10(a) federal Recovery Permit for vernal pool branchiopods, California red-legged frog, San Francisco garter snake, and California tiger salamander; and he performs a wide range of focused biological surveys throughout the State.

Relevant Experience
Napa County, 2025 Baseline Data Report, Napa County, CA. Technical Lead and Lead Biologist. The Baseline Data Report (BDR) intends to catalog and assess baseline environmental conditions throughout Napa County on various resource topics. ESA is providing full planning and implementation support for this project, from data-gathering to report and application development for public viewing. This includes preparing administrative draft Baseline Data Report (BDR) chapters designed to support the County’s General Plan Update and associated EIR. Brian is leading a team that provides biological resources and connectivity mapping.

SFO, West-of-Bayshore Enhancement Program, San Francisco, CA. Senior Biologist. As an agency-approved biologist, Brian was the field lead for SFO’s West-of-Bayshore canal enhancement project. In 2022, SFO completed specific vegetation and sediment removal activities to improve habitat conditions for two federally listed species—the endangered San Francisco garter snake (SFGS) and the threatened California red-legged frog (CRLF)— by removing vegetation and sediment from portions of South Lomita and San Felipe canals. During the two-month canal enhancement effort, Brian led a team of 8 to 10 onsite biologists who worked closely with the SFO contractor to monitor the removal of excavated materials and ensure protection of target wildlife species. Biologists performed preconstruction surveys for SFGS and CRLF, hand-sorted excavated materials to locate animals, relocated CRLF and SFGS when identified in the work area, and escorted work vehicles through the work site. Work was completed in October 2022.

SFO, Master Plan NEPA documentation. Senior Biologist. Brian prepared portions of the biological resources and hydrology analyses in support of the new International Terminal, boarding areas and aircraft gates, parking garage, ground transportation center and automated people mover, roadway and circulation system improvements, ALP approval, potential application for PFC funding, and other airport and commercial improvements.

EDUCATION
M.S., Environmental
Studies, San Jose State
University
B.A., Biology, University of
California, Santa Cruz
26 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
Certified Wildlife Biologist
- The Wildlife Society,
2004
California Scientific
Collecting Permit
ID# 003068
Federal Recovery Permit
#TE-027422-6 (fairy
shrimp, California tiger
salamander, and
California red-legged frog)
FAA-certified Unmanned
Aircraft System (UAS) pilot

TRAINING
2017 Salt Marsh Harvest
Mouse Workshop (2-day
with field I.D. & handling)
CDFW California Aquatic
Bioassessment Workshop
Wetland Delineation
Training Course, U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers
Desert Tortoise Survey
Techniques Workshop,
Desert Tortoise Council
783
Brian Pittman, CWB (Continued)
Biological Resources
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Port of San Francisco (for Weiss Associates), As-Needed Environmental and Related Professional Services, City and County of San Francisco, CA. Sr. Wildlife Biologist. Brian was the lead biologist under the Port’s as-needed services contract with Weiss Associates. In this capacity, he performed a detailed biological review that supported the CEQA analysis for the Crane Cove Park Project (within the Pier 70 Master Plan area). This project required permit from the USACE, the RWQCB, and San Francisco BCDC; consultations with the USFWS and NMFS; and coordination under Section 106 of the NHPA. Brian collaborated closely with Port staff to prepare and submit permit applications to the resource agencies.

Hollister Airport Biological Services, Hollister, CA. Technical Specialist and Lead Biologist. In support of the Hollister Airport runway widening and safety project, Brian assisted the City in developing a strategy to identify and protect California tiger salamanders and burrowing owls on the airport during construction. Over the course of a week, he led a team of wildlife biologists that cleared approximately 90 acres airport lands prior to the runway expansion project.

S.F. Public Utilities Commission, Alameda Creek Recapture Project, Alameda Creek, CA. Senior Biologist. As part of the ESA/Orion team, Brian supported the CEQA analysis and performed focused habitat reviews for sensitive wildlife in Alameda Creek, including the foothill yellow-legged frog and California red-legged frog to better represent the impact of the proposed effects of water recapture on the wildlife resources within Alameda Creek.

Marin Municipal Water District. California Red-legged Frog Surveys. Project Manager and Lead Biologist. Brian coordinated with fisheries biologists at MMWD to assess their maintenance projects in the Lagunitas Creek Watershed and performed a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protocol-level survey to ascertain the presence and distribution of California red-legged frogs in the local project vicinity. The survey results informed which areas needed coordination with resource agencies to address potential impacts to red-legged frogs.

California High Speed Rail Project, Environmental Compliance for Merced to Fresno Construction Package 1 (CP1), Merced to Fresno, CA. Senior Biologist. As a subconsultant to the Tutor Perini Zachary Parsons (TPZP) Joint Venture, ESA is providing environmental compliance support services for the Merced to Fresno Construction Package 1 (CP1), the 29-mile first segment of the California High Speed Rail design/build project. ESA is supporting TPZP and the Authority by providing both biological and cultural resources technical studies, including conducting historical and archaeological surveys, evaluations, and implementation of mitigation measures, in support of the design and construction of the project. Further, ESA is leading pre-construction surveys for targeted species (i.e., California tiger salamander, San Joaquin kit fox, Swainson’s hawk, burrowing owl, and rare plants) and providing all biological monitoring during construction. Lastly, ESA is providing GIS support throughout construction to document habitat disturbances in real time and demonstrate compliance with numerous environmental compliance commitments. As a senior project biologist since 2013, Brian has conducted pre-construction surveys, biological surveys (general and focused), and provided QA/QC oversight to maintain project compliance with MMRP requirements and project environmental permits.

Mai/Chardonnay Resort EIR, Suisun City, CA. Lead Biologist. Brian prepared the focused biological constraints analysis in support of the biological analysis for the proposed development of a 46-acre resort hotel and vineyards in Napa County. He was the technical lead for the wetland delineation, and prepared the biological resources section of the EIR which analyzed potential environmental effects related to compatibility with the Airport Industrial Area Specific Plan. 784
Chris Fitzer
Biological Resources (Fisheries)
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Chris Fitzer has more than 27 years of experience in working on a diverse range of projects involving fisheries and aquatic ecology, water supply, watershed assessment and management, aquatic ecosystem restoration and enhancement, comprehensive water resource planning and management for local, state, and federal agencies; and water rights applications and other regulatory/permit proceedings. He possesses effective problemsolving abilities, excellent writing skills, and the ability to work with diverse, multidisciplinary teams. He has expertise in managing fisheries and aquatic science staff, largescale and complex projects, client and stakeholder interactions, and excellent technical capabilities. Chris has developed approaches to fish sampling programs and surveys, habitat evaluation and restoration, limiting factors analyses, habitat-flow relationship analyses, computational hydrologic and water quality model interpretation, and a working knowledge of California water rights issues. Over the years he has developed trusted, working relationships with resource and regulatory agency personnel and has a strong understanding of diverse and complex regulatory and stakeholder environments for projects located in coastal, Sierra Nevada, Central Valley, Delta, and Bay regions. He is proficient in document preparation and permitting for projects requiring CEQA, NEPA, ESA Section 7 compliance, and California ESA Section 2081 compliance. Chris has also led or assisted in the development of several land/resource management plans.

Relevant Experience
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Meeks Bay Restoration Project, Lake Tahoe, CA.

Aquatic Ecologist/Fish Technical Lead. ESA served as fish and aquatic resources technical lead for the Meeks Bay Restoration Project, which is being developed to restore the Meeks Creek stream channel and wetland/lagoon below the State Route (SR) 89 to a more natural condition where geomorphic and hydrologic processes support a functioning ecosystem while continuing to support sustainable recreation opportunities. Other key project objectives include improving/managing fish passage and flood flow conveyance through the SR 89 stream crossing, and control or eradication of current populations of terrestrial and aquatic invasive plant and animal species.

Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Tahoe City Marina EIR/EIS, Placer County, CA.

Fisheries Biologist/Water Quality Specialist. Mr Fitzer, working with an interdisciplinary team, prepared an EIR/EIS for the Tahoe City Marina Expansion Master Plan. The expansion was planned through the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) master plan steering committee process, and the EIR/ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared with continued steering committee consultation. The marina expansion involved an additional 144 boat slips built in two phases. Key project issues include water quality, attainment of TRPA thresholds, compliance with the Basin 208 Plan and water quality regulations, scenic effects, traffic and parking, site coverage, and pedestrian/bicycle circulation. Mr. Fitzer provided analysis support related to fisheries and water quality issues addressed in the EIR/EIS.

EDUCATION
Masters in Environmental
Planning
(Watershed/Water
Resource Concentration),
University of Colorado
B.A., Geography
(Biogeography
Concentration), Texas
Tech University
27 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

TRAINING
Resource Management
and Sustainable
Development (Field
Course), Institute for
Central American
Development Studies, San
Jose, Costa Rica, 1994
Fluvial Geomorphology:

Principles and
Applications to River
Restoration. University of
California White Mountain
Research Station, Bishop,
CA. 2004
Aquatic Ecological
Bioassessment Workshop.

University of California,
Davis, CA. 2005

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
American Fisheries
Society
785
Chris Fitzer (Continued)
Biological Resources (Fisheries)
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, Lake Tahoe Shorezone Ordinance Amendments Final Environmental Impact Statement and Response to Comments, Tahoe Basin, CA and NV. Aquatic Ecologist. Working with an interdisciplinary team, Chris assisted TRPA in preparing a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and Final EIS which evaluated five alternatives for amendments to the Shorezone Ordinance relating to shorezone development/ facilities (piers, buoys, floating docks, slips), scenic resources, water quality, fish habitat, recreation, and other issue areas. Chris also assisted TRPA in preparing a Supplemental DEIS to present a sixth alternative, which was crafted based on public and agency comments from the five previous alternatives. Mr. Fitzer provided the assessment of the Shorezone Ordinance effects on fisheries resources, water quality, and hydrology.

Meeks Creek Fish Management Structure Design and Feasibility Project, Lake Tahoe, CA. Clients: U.S. Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit (LTBMU), Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. Aquatic Ecologist/Fish Technical Lead. ESA is serving as fish and aquatic resources technical lead for the Meeks Creek Fish Management Structure Design and Feasibility Project, which is being developed to manage native and nonnative fish species in the Meeks Creek Watershed with a focus on Lahontan cutthroat trout recovery. The project is a component of the Meeks Bay Restoration Project, which Chris provided fish technical assessment services. Technical services by ESA include identifying species of management interest, developing life history and life stage habitat suitability requirements, developing swim performance information for target species and other species that may serves as surrogates for swim performance information, developing management objectives, contributing to design concepts for the fish management structure, and developing an operations and management framework for the structure.

California Tahoe Conservancy, Upper Truckee River and Blackwood Creek Bioassessment Monitoring, South Lake Tahoe, CA. Project Manager. Chris managed a large-scale, two-year bioassessment monitoring program at 24 sites on the Upper Truckee River and Blackwood Creek. The work included collaborating with CTC on site location identification, review of methodologies, implementation of data collection, including benthic macroinvertebrate specimen collection and handling, data processing and analysis, and reporting.

California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sierra District, Upper Truckee River Restoration and Golf Course Relocation Project EIR/EIS/EIS, El Dorado County, CA. Fisheries Biologist. Chris provided analysis of fisheries and aquatic resources and conducted fish surveys and bioassessments for this proposed restoration project along the Upper Truckee River in Washoe Meadows State Park and Lake Valley SRA in South Lake Tahoe. He worked with a team that prepared a joint EIR/EIS/EIS to meet CEQA, NEPA, and TRPA requirements. The project would restore the river’s natural geomorphic processes, planform, and profile and reduce its discharge of suspended sediment to Lake Tahoe. The project would require relocation of several golf course holes to reduce the area of stream environment zone occupied by the golf course and allow for establishment of a buffer area between the golf course and the river. Key environmental issues addressed include hydrology, geomorphology, water quality, biological resources, cultural resources, recreation, land use, and scenic resources.
786
Autumn Ward, CM, ENV SP
Community/Stakeholder Engagement
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Autumn has 20 years of experience in the aviation field. She has a strong background in aviation noise, stakeholder engagement and community outreach, and environmental planning. Her project experience has included facilities ranging in size from small general aviation airports to major large-hub air carrier airports in the United States and abroad.

She is experienced with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and regulatory requirements and skilled in documenting and presenting the results of technical analyses in a manner that can be clearly understood by the public.

Relevant Experience
Sacramento County Department of Airports and WattEV, Sacramento County [Department of Airports]/WattEV Commercial Charging Center, Sacramento, CA.

Project Director. Autumn is the project director for an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a publicly accessible Electric Vehicle (EV) charging facility to be built on a 110+-acre parcel of land owned by the Sacramento International Airport (SMF). The facility would include EV charging stations powered by a new solar array and would serve shippers and transporters as well as public transportation and passenger vehicles. The charging stations along with three accessory structures would provide services to the traveling public (i.e., convenience store, resting lounge, restrooms, etc.) and would be located on the northern portion of the Proposed Project site while the solar array would be located on the approximately 100 acres in the southern portion of the site. ¶Agency coordination on the EA includes Section 7 consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service related to the Giant Garter Snake; Section 106 consultation with the California State Historic Preservation Office for historic resources; consultation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency for floodplains; and consultation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California Air Resources Board, and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District for air quality.

San Bernardino International Airport Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Eastgate Air Cargo Facility. San Bernardino, CA. Project Manager. This Project included the development of the Eastgate Air Cargo Facility, a sorting and distribution center with an air cargo hub. Autumn led preparation of the EA, the complex Public Workshop and Public Hearing, and coordination with the San Bernardino International Airport Authority and FAA. Public outreach efforts included translating outreach materials in multiple languages, providing translators for the Workshop and Hearing, and additional court reporters. This project was challenged, and successfully defended, in the 9th Circuit Court.

Bishop Airport NEPA/CEQA Analyses. Bishop, CA. Project Director. ESA prepared NEPA and CEQA studies for Bishop Airport (BIH) to obtain a 14 CFR Part 139 Airport Operating Certificate and amending Operations Specifications to provide scheduled commercial air passenger service to BIH. ESA is now preparing NEPA and CEQA analyses for Runway Safety Area improvements. Autumn provides guidance and oversight throughout the NEPA evaluation process, quality assurance, and leads the public outreach activities.

Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Part 150 Study. Broward County Aviation Department. Fort Lauderdale, FL. Deputy Project Manager. ESA is preparing a 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 150 Study to address noise concerns after the opening of the new south runway. This Study evaluates aircraft noise compatibility of Fort

EDUCATION
M.S., Aeronautics
(specialization in
Aviation/Aerospace Safety
Systems), Embry Riddle
Aeronautical University
B.S., Aviation Business
Administration, Embry Riddle
Aeronautical University
20 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
Certified Member, American
Association of Airport
Executives, 2012
EnvisionTM Sustainability
Professional and Verifier, 2013

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Board Co-Chair, Tony Jannus
Distinguished Aviation Society
Former Vice Chair, Florida
Airports Council, Noise
Abatement and Community
Affairs Committee
Past President, WTS
International – Tampa Bay
Chapter
787
Autumn Ward, CM, ENV SP (Continued)
Community/Stakeholder Engagement
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL) with the local community, which included coordination with numerous land use jurisdictions located as far as 10 miles from FLL. Autumn led the noise modeling effort, documentation of the findings, and coordination of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and public outreach throughout the Study.

Naples Municipal Airport Part 150 Study and On-Call Services. Naples Airport Authority. Naples, FL. Project Manager. ESA is preparing a Part 150 Study to address noise concerns in the vicinity of the Airport. This Study includes an extensive outreach program led by Autumn, including four rounds of Public Workshops, more than a dozen small community meetings, Technical Advisory Committee meetings, and other community outreach. Autumn also led the noise modeling effort in support of the Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) approved in December 2021, the Noise Compatibility Program, and documentation of the findings. Autumn Ward is also leading the additional on-call services contracts which, to date, includes more than 20 task orders totaling nearly $500,000. The additional analyses have included supplemental noise contours, seasonal population review, aircraft profile analyses, and additional outreach support and analyses.

Snohomish County Airport/Paine Field New Airline Service Supplemental Environmental Assessment. Alaska Airlines and United Airlines. Everett, WA. Project Manager. 2016-2019. ESA prepared a Supplemental EA for Alaska and United Airlines in order to initiate air carrier service at Paine Field, necessitating the need for a Part 139 Certificate and Operation Specification Amendments. Primary concerns related to the increase in aircraft noise, traffic, and air quality emissions. Autumn was the Project Manager and led the EA analysis, NEPA documentation, complex public outreach including Public Workshop and Public Hearing, and response to comments.

Philadelphia International Airport, Capacity Enhancement Program Environmental Impact Statement, Philadelphia, PA. Airport Planner. Autumn assisted with preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) for the proposed major airfield reconfiguration of Philadelphia International Airport.

Responsibilities included technical writing and quality assurance for the Final EIS and ROD and responding to public and agency comments on the Draft EIS. She was also responsible for development of the project’s Administrative Record and supported the FAA and Department of Justice throughout the litigation process.

FAA Advisory Circular 150-5050.4, Community Involvement in Airport Planning. Airport Planner. Advisory Circular (AC) 5050-4, Citizen Participation in Airport Planning, was issued on September 26, 1975, and had not been updated.

Autumn assisted with the revision of this AC, which included effective measures for citizen participation in NEPA environmental processes, Airport Master Planning, the Part 150 noise compatibility process, and Part 161 access and noise restriction process.

Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Airfield Development Supplemental Environmental Assessment. Pitkin County.

Aspen, CO. Project Manager. ESA is leading the NEPA effort to review the Proposed Project elements of the Airport Improvements Environmental Assessment that have changed since approval of the EA. The Proposed Project elements include development airfield changes including a taxiway shift, relocated Air Traffic Control Tower and ASOS, and apron expansions. Based on community interest, it is anticipated that community engagement will be a large part of the EA process.

San Antonio International Airport Part 150 Noise Exposure Map Update. San Antonio Airport System. San Antonio, TX. Public Outreach Task Leader. ESA completed a Noise Exposure Map (NEM) update for the San Antonio International Airport (SAT). This study evaluated the aircraft noise compatibility of SAT with the surrounding local communities.

Autumn led the public outreach effort, which was the first Part 150 Study ever to conduct the public information workshops on a completely virtual platform; these meetings were conducted in both English and Spanish. Community concerns were primarily related to potential eligibility for residential acoustical treatment and shifting arrival and departure patterns and nighttime/early morning cargo operations associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. 788
Brian Schuster
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Brian Schuster leads ESA's Northern California Air Quality, Climate, and Acoustics practice.

Since 2008, Brian has been consulting in the fields of air quality and climate change for CEQA, NEPA, and Climate Action Planning. Brian has many years of project management and technical leadership experience, often for large, complex, and controversial projects.

He has authored dozens of EIR chapters for Air Quality, Climate Change, and Energy for a wide variety of projects. He develops, plans, and implements Climate Action Plans (CAPs) for public and private agencies throughout California. Brian was or is CAP project manager or project director for Los Angeles County, Sacramento County, Orange County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Sonoma County, Marin County, the City of Long Beach, and the City of Ontario, and has served as deputy project manager or technical lead for numerous other CAPs.

Relevant Experience
Napa County, 2025 Baseline Data Report, Napa County, CA. Air Quality Technical Lead. The Baseline Data Report (BDR) intends to catalog and assess baseline environmental conditions throughout Napa County on various resource topics. ESA is providing full planning and implementation support for this project, from data-gathering to report and application development for public viewing. This includes preparing administrative draft Baseline Data Report (BDR) chapters designed to support the County’s General Plan Update and associated EIR. Brian is leading a team performing air quality services such as ambient monitoring summaries and an inventory of emissions estimates.

San Francisco International Airport, Recommended Airport Development Plan EIR, San Francisco, CA. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Lead. Brian is currently leading a team to prepare an Air Quality Technical Report along with Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas sections for a complex EIR for SFO’s next long term masterplan—the Recommended Airport Development Plan (RADP). Brian is leading a team to model construction and operational emissions of criteria pollutants, TACs, and GHGs. His team is conducting a detailed, comprehensive HRA for both construction and operational TAC exposure for all sources at SFO related to the RADP. The RADP will support the strategic development of the airport over the next two decades. ESA managed the EIR for SFO’s previous 1989 masterplan (EIR certified in 1992), which served the continuous growth of the airport over the last 25 years.

San Francisco International Airport, Shoreline Protection Program Project EIR, San Francisco, CA. Technical Lead. Brian managed the air quality and greenhouse gas analysis for a complex EIR for SFO’s Shoreline Protection Program Project, which looks to armor the approximately 8-mile coastline around SFO in order to accommodate sea-level rise through end of century. Brian led a team to model construction emissions of criteria pollutants, TACs, and GHGs. His team is conducting a detailed, comprehensive HRA for

EDUCATION
BS, Atmospheric, Oceanic,
and Environmental
Science, University of
California, Los Angeles
17 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Association of
Environmental
Professionals (AEP), Active
Member, 2017-present
AEP Climate Change
Committee, Active
Member, 2018-present
Bay Planning Coalition,
Board Member, Air Quality
Committee, 2025-present
National Association of
Environmental
Professionals (NAEP),
Active Member, 2020-
present
Air and Waste
Management Association,
Active Member, 2022-
present
789
Brian Schuster (Continued)
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
operational TAC exposure to nearby sensitive receptors, and is preparing the Air Quality Technical Report and EIR section for the project.

San Francisco International Airport, SFO Environmental Management System and Sustainability Plan, San Francisco, CA. Technical Analyst. Prior to ESA, Brian supported the San Francisco International Airport (SFO) in developing their Environmental Management System (EMS) as part of the airport’s Sustainability Plan. He reviewed EMS software, worked with SFO staff to develop environmental tracking parameters and metrics, provided guidance to staff on the use of the software, and presented findings and recommendations to the SFO team.

Port of San Francisco, Waterfront Plan Update Program EIR, San Francisco, CA. Technical Lead. Brian led a team to prepare the air quality analysis for the Port of San Francisco’s Waterfront Plan Update Project, a programmatic EIR that analyzed amendments and updates the Waterfront Land Use Plan (WLUP)—the governing policy document for the Port’s approximately 7.5-mile waterfront property. The Plan updates focus on advancing new goals and policies in the areas of waterfront resilience, environmental sustainability, financial strength, and continued public engagement.

El Dorado County Water Agency (EDCWA), El Dorado Water Reliability Project (WRP), CEQA Environmental Impact Report, El Dorado County, CA. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Strategy. EDCWA has applied for assignment of a 1927 priority State “area of origin” water right to the Upper American River totaling 40,000 acre-feet per year (AFY). EDCWA, working with other agencies within the American River basin, desires to put this water to beneficial use as a regional asset to meet both interim and long-term water needs within the watershed. ESA is preparing an EIR that will ultimately support a State-filing water rights application. Brian advised on the strategy for evaluating the project’s air quality and greenhouse gas impacts and mitigation. He also provided senior review for the air quality and greenhouse gas chapters of the EIR.

Stonestown Development Project, San Francisco, CA. Air Quality Technical Lead. Brian served as the technical lead for the air quality analysis for the project, which would include up to approximately 2,930 residential units; up to 160,000 square feet of new retail; up to 200,000 square feet of office; up to approximately 100,000 square feet of hotel; approximately 53,000 square feet of cultural, institutional, and educational uses; approximately 4,000 parking spaces; 6 acres of open space; and infrastructure improvements. The EIR also analyzed one variant to the project. Brian led the preparation of the air quality EIR chapter. The analyses includes criteria pollutant emissions modeling for project construction and operations and a comprehensive project-level HRA for construction and operational TAC exposure along with a cumulative HRA for all nearby existing TAC sources.

City of San Francisco, 2012 Community-wide and Municipal GHG Inventory Verification, San Francisco, CA.

Technical Analyst. Prior to ESA, Brian conducted third-party verification of San Francisco's 2012 community-wide GHG emissions inventory as well as its Fiscal Year (FY) 2011-2012 municipal GHG inventory. He prepared a thorough review of the inventories, identified opportunities for improvement and correction, and authored verification reports for both inventories.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Zero Waste and GHG Emissions Tool, San Francisco, CA. Project Manager and Technical Analyst. Prior to ESA, Brian developed a custom Excel-based tool to help decision-makers select appropriate waste management options for meeting their GHG reduction goals. The tool analyzes baseline waste management characteristics and five separate strategies, including residential recycling and composting, commercial diversion, and construction and demolition debris diversion. The tool calculates the lifecycle GHG benefits of each of these strategies and allows users to adjust strategy characteristics in order to maximize GHG reductions. 790
Becky Urbano
Historic Resources/Section 106
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Becky offers successful project management strategies for complex resource management issues. She has a solid background in materials science, on-site investigations, compliance regulation requirements (CEQA, NEPA, Section 106, Section 110, etc.), and environmental review procedures at the local, state, and federal levels.

Through her years of work in California, Becky has extensive knowledge of the wide range of local archives, historic resources, and regional development patterns. Becky currently leads ESA’s Northern California Architectural History team.

Relevant Experience
Lake Tahoe Airport, TVL TRPA/CEQA Documentation, South Lake Tahoe, CA.

Architectural Historian. Becky prepared a historic resource evaluation of the airport facility and completed relevant portions of the CEQA documentation.

SFO Environmental Review On Call, San Francisco, CA. Technical Lead and Architectural Historian. ESA currently provides environmental consulting services for CEQA, NEPA, Section 106, and local planning processing. Becky is responsible for all services related to architectural resources and environmental review. Projects range from single structures to campus-wide projects, critical infrastructure to community outreach and compliance.

Working closely with SFO staff, ESA assists with technical studies as well as agency consultation for both local and federal agencies.

SFO Noise Improvement Program Section 106 Compliance, various. Technical Lead and Architectural Historian. To mitigate airport-related noise in residential and commercial neighborhoods surrounding San Francisco Airport, ESA conducts regular Section 106 compliance documentation in support of the FAA-funding Noise Improvement Program at SFO. Becky leads a team of architectural historians to conduct field surveys, archival research, and evaluations of historical significance against the requirements for the National Register of Historic Places. All of ESA’s compliance reports have received concurrence with FAA review on the initial submission, greatly reducing the timeline for SFO to release funds for program implementation.

Napa County, 2025 Baseline Data Report, Napa County, CA. Technical Lead and Architectural Historian. The Baseline Data Report (BDR) intends to catalog and assess baseline environmental conditions throughout Napa County on various resource topics.

ESA is providing full planning and implementation support for this project, from datagathering to report and application development for public viewing. This includes preparing administrative draft Baseline Data Report (BDR) chapters designed to support the County’s General Plan Update and associated EIR. Becky is leading a team providing historical resources which includes records searches and policy updates.

SFO Shoreline Protection Plan CEQA, San Francisco, CA. Senior Technical and QA/QC Review. ESA is currently managing a complex EIR for SFO’s Shoreline Protection Program Project. Becky manages the archtiectural history team completing all technical PHONE: 415.896.5900

EDUCATION
M.S., Historic
Preservation, Columbia
University
B.A., Physics, Middlebury
College
18 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

QUALIFICATIONS
Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional
Qualifications Standards
for Architectural History

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Sacred Sites International
(Board Member)
California Preservation
Foundation
National Trust for Historic
Places
Oakland Heritage Alliance
AWARDS
California Preservation
Foundation Design Award
(2009, 2015)
California Legislative
Recognition (2014)
Governors’ Preservation
Award (2010)
Los Angeles Conservancy
Award (2009)
791
Becky Urbano (Continued)
Historic Resources/Section 106
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
documentation, assessments, and document preparation related to architectural resouces potentially impacted by the project.

Section 106 Support for the Environmental Assessment of the RNAV (GPS) Runway 4L approach procedure at Boston Logan International Airport, MA. Technical Lead. As a member of the RoVolus project team, ESA is assisting the Federal Aviation Administration in preparing an Environmental Assessment for the implementation of an approach procedure into Runway 4L at Boston Logan International Airport. Becky provides technical support for Section 106 consultation efforts. This includes providing adjunct support to the FAA and project team with regard to architectural resources, Section 106 procedures, and ongoing consultation between SHPO and the FAA.

Amazon Prime Air, Environmental Assessments (EAs) for Commercial Drone Delivery, Various Locations. ESA is currently assisting Amazon Prime Air to prepare EAs, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, so that they can secure Part 135 Operations Specification approval to conduct commercial drone delivery services. The scope of environmental analyses includes detailed assessments of potential impacts to biological resources, historic resources, noise and land use, Section 4(f) properties, and environmental justice communities. Agency consultation efforts include a wide variety of state and federal regulatory agencies, including state and tribal historic preservation offices, FWS, and state coastal zone management agencies.

Port of San Francisco Waterfront Land Use Plan Update EIR, San Francisco, CA. Senior Technical and QA/QC Review.

Working with the Port of San Francisco and the City and County of San Francisco, ESA is preparing a programmatic level EIR for the 2019 update to the Port of San Francisco Waterfront Land Use Plan. This project encompasses over seven miles of shoreline and adjacent Port-owned property, including dozens of historic resources. Becky oversees the team of architectural historians preparing the relevant portions of the EIR and is responsible for technical review and quality control of that work.

SFPUC Vista Grande Tunnel and Canal HAER Documentation, San Francisco, CA. Technical Lead. In compliance with a Memorandum of Agreement between SFPUC, Daly City, Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), and the National Park Service (NPS), ESA is preparing a Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) for the 1896 Vista Grande Tunnel and Canal in San Francisco. Becky is the lead architectural historian on the project which includes consultation between two federal agencies (GGNRA and NPS) and agencies from two cities (SFPUC and Daly City Public Works). Develop of the HAER package includes preparing a submittal package that relies on existing documentation to cut costs and streamline production, as well as creation of new photographic and descriptive documentation to meet the HAER program requirements as stipulated by the Library of Congress.

Historic Stone Ranch Building Stabilization Guide, Fallon Naval Air Station, NV and China Lake Naval Air Weapon Station, CA. Architectural Historian / Architectural Conservator. Dixie Valley, Nevada was once part of a small but resilient group of 19th century homesteaders who arrived in Nevada via the Carson River route of the California Trail. Several remnants of their early ranch buildings, constructed of stone, lime-based mortar, and limited timbering still exist deep in the valley. Today, the area is subject to vibration from frequent sonic booms resulting from high-speed flight training originating from the nearby Fallon Naval Air Station. Under an as-needed historic preservation contract with the General Services Administration, Becky worked with a small team of architects to document and assess the conditions of one homesteading site for the purposes of developing a stabilization guide for use by Fallon NAS cultural resources staff. 792
Matthew Brennan, PhD, PE
Senior Engineering Hydrologist
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Matt is an engineering hydrologist with more than 20 years specializing in estuarine management and restoration. His strengths include evaluating and designing management and restoration scenarios from hydrologic and geomorphic perspectives to support ecosystem sustainability. In conjunction with these technical skills, Matt’s management experience includes active client communication, integrating input from expert advisors, overseeing and providing senior review of technical tasks.

Relevant Experience
San Francisco International Airport, Shoreline Protection Program, Millbrae, CA. Task Lead – Coastal Hydraulics. SFO is planning shoreline flood protection infrastructure to protect its facilities from coastal flooding increased by sea level rise while also maintain airfield operations. This requires new shoreline flood barriers and placing fill in the Bay.

Matt led the development and application of hydrodynamic and wave models to assess the potential impacts of the project on Bay habitats and adjoining shoreline. These modeling results serve as the technical basis for CEQA impacts analysis in the Environmental Impact Report. In addition, Matt has led the permitting and design team’s Engineering Criteria Review Board efforts for Bay Conservation and Development Commission permitting.

California Department of Water Resources, Lookout Slough Tidal Restoration and Flood Improvement Project, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, CA. Hydrodynamics and Water Quality. This project aims to create approximately 3,000 acres of natural freshwater tidal marsh in the Cache Slough Complex in the northern Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and increase the regional flood conveyance capacity of the Yolo Bypass. ESA provided services include 2D hydrodynamic analysis and vegetation colonization surveys to support restoration design, permitting and crediting; 2D hydraulic and wind-wave analyses to support the project team’s levee design, erosion countermeasure design, and permitting through the CVFPB encroachment permit and USACE Section 408 permitting process; preparation of the Final EIR and Final EA. In addition to serving as a water quality subject matter expert during CEQA public comment period, Matt also led the project’s twodimensional wind-wave runup analysis, the results of which were used to inform design of nature-based features (HPTRM erosion protection) that saved the project over $4 million in construction cost and significantly reduced impacts during construction.

California Department of Water Resources, Grizzly Slough Floodplain Restoration Project, Thornton, CA. Hydraulic Modeling Lead. The Grizzly Slough Floodplain Restoration Project at the Cosumnes River Preserve will restore wetland and riparian habitat by reintroducing tidal and seasonal flooding and establishing native vegetation.

The site (489 acres) is owned by DWR and managed by the Preserve. ESA is working with DWR and Wagner & Bonsignore Engineers to provide restoration planning, CEQA documentation, environmental permitting, and engineering design. The restoration

EDUCATION
PhD, and MS, Civil and
Environmental
Engineering, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA
BS, Civil and
Environmental
Engineering, Princeton
University
20 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
Civil Engineer, State of
California, C72551
793
Matthew Brennan, PhD, PE (Continued)
Senior Engineering Hydrologist
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
design includes elements to avoid impacts expected to be common to other future Delta restorations: special status species that currently use the site; potential for fish stranding; on-site infrastructure for power and gas; and real estate inholdings for ecosystem mitigation and mineral rights. ESA also assisted in with a successful Proposition 1 Grant Application. Matt designed and oversaw the collection of hydrologic data during the large floods of January 2017, and then led the development of the site’s 2D hydrodynamic model. After the model was calibrated with the 2017 data, Matt collaborated with the project’s civil engineers and biologists to characterize the restoration’s effect on hydraulics and habitat. This modeling informed the design of tidal channels, a setback levee, an overflow weir, and culverts, as well as characterized the hydrology under restored conditions that determine the site’s future vegetation, habitats, and uplands agricultural uses. Matt has also participated in outreach to neighboring landowners and Central Valley Flood Protection Board.

California State Coastal Conservancy, South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, San Francisco Bay, CA.

Hydrodynamic Modeler. California State Coastal Conservancy, South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, San Francisco Bay, CA. Hydrodynamic Modeler. The project consists of restoring 15,000 acres of former salt ponds to tidal action, enhancing wetland habitat and providing flood protection. Matt performed DELFT3D hydrodynamic modeling for NEPA/CEQA, and assessed the long-term impacts on water levels, salinity, tidal prism and habitat. Further particle transport modeling optimized specific project features to meet the multiple criteria of sediment management, water quality and ecological habitat. In addition, Matt provided hydraulic analysis and design guidance to inform adaptive management of shoreline erosion.

Solano County Water Agency, Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) in Cache Slough: Assessing Potential Wetlands Restoration Changes and Establishing Baseline Monitoring, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, CA. Project Manager.

Provided a scoping assessment of potential increases in DOC delivery to Barker Slough Pumping Plant as a result of proposed large-scale wetlands restoration within the Cache Slough region of the Delta. In light of the potential impacts, aided client in developing a DOC monitoring plan to establish baseline conditions for detecting possible future changes resulting from restoration.

Solano County Water Agency, Barker Slough Hydrodynamic Study, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, CA. Dr. Brennan assessed water quality impacts to the Barker Slough Pumping Plant using a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of a system influenced by both riverine and tidal forcing. Quantified the relative contribution of different water sources and the flushing times for a range of hydrologic scenarios.

City of Oakland, Oakland A's Waterfront Ballpark District EIR, Oakland, CA. Coastal Engineer. ESA prepared an EIR to analyze potential impacts of development of the Oakland Athletics’ proposed new baseball stadium and mixed-use development at the Port of Oakland. The project site is 55 acres and is immediately adjacent and to the west of the Oakland ferry terminal. ESA’s team of technical experts analyzed a full range of environmental issues for the EIR, as well as peer-reviewed technical studies prepared by others. ESA worked extensively with Port of Oakland staff throughout the process to ensure the Port’s input, as a Responsible Agency for the project, was thoroughly incorporated. The work involved detailed transportation and air quality analyses, potential impacts on Port operations, and consideration of offsite transportation and connectivity improvements. Potential conflicts between recreational watercraft, commercial vessels, and ferries in the channel were also assessed. The EIR was certified in February 2022. After characterizing the existing site's vulnerability to flooding, Matt analyzed the proposed project for sea-level rise resilience to coastal flooding, stormwater management, and groundwater rise.
794
Chris Nottoli, INCE
Noise (Aviation)
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Chris Nottoli has 10 years’ of experience in modeling aviation and surface transportation noise. He serves as the technical lead of ESA’s aircraft noise modeling group. Chris has worked on over 40 domestic and international airports supporting the needs of the client and community. He has advanced knowledge of aviation practices and environmental concepts of aircraft noise modeling. Chris has served as technical lead, project manager, quality control manager, and noise modeler on Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), Environmental Assessments (EA), Noise Compatibility Programs (NCP) and various special studies in aviation, residential sound insulation, and highway noise projects. He is an expert user of regulatory software and industry standard programs including Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT), Traffic Noise Model (TNM), Microsoft SQL, and ESRI ArcGIS Pro.

Recent Relevant Experience
Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), Quarterly Noise Contours, Los Angeles, CA. Task Manager and Modeler. Chris oversaw the collection of radar data for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and Van Nuys Airport (VNY) for bulk insertion into an MSSQL database and then into the AEDT. Chris coordinated with the data supplier, Envirosuite, to correct an atypical rotation in the radar data. An appropriate counter rotation was determined and applied to the radar tracks prior to running the AEDT. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) contours were sent to LAWA for inclusion in the California State Airport Noise Standard Quarterly Report. LAWA must complete and submit the quarterly reports to the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics to satisfy the requirements of Section 5012 of Title 21 of the California Code of Regulations (21 CCR § 5012).

Port of Oakland, Quarterly Noise Reports, Oakland, CA. Task Manager. Chris coordinated with the Port of Oakland to obtain quarterly noise and radar data and delegated data analysis and modeling tasks to other staff. Chris ensured all radar flight tracks, runway use, and AEDT aircraft assignments were accurate and bulk inserted into AEDT. The daily noise measurement data were analyzed to determine the monthly noise level at each NMT. The monthly data was included in the 12-month running average and compared against the modeled CNEL results for each NMT. Chris was also responsible for the quality control of the technical report that outlined the inputs used in the AEDT as well as the noise model results. The Port of Oakland must complete and submit the quarterly reports to Caltrans Division of Aeronautics to satisfy the requirements of 21 CCR § 5012.

Naples Airport Authority, Naples Airport Noise Compatibility Program (NCP), Naples, FL (2022-present). Noise Modeling Lead. Chris developed and analyzed potential noise abatement measures with input from stakeholders and the community. Measures include noise modeling of offset approaches, varying approach glide slopes, and evaluating the effects of air traffic hold downs on arriving and departing aircraft operations. The Naples NCP is scheduled for completion in early 2023.

EDUCATION
B.S., Acoustics, Columbia
College Chicago, 2014
9 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
Institute of Noise Control
Engineering Certification,
INCE-USA, 2023
Private Pilot, ASEL, 2018,
No Expiration
Instrument Rating, ASEL,
Anticipated 2023

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Member, Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA),
Aviation Environmental
Design Tool (AEDT) User
Review Group
Member, Airport
Consultants Council
(ACC), Planning and
Environmental
795
Chris Nottoli, INCE (Continued)
Noise (Aviation)
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Allegheny County Airport Authority (ACAA), Pittsburg International Airport (PIT) Concourse A Voluntary Airport Low Emission (VALE) Program, Pittsburg, PA. Noise Modeling Lead. Chris assisted with developing the fleet mix and operational calculations for air quality modeling. Chris also assisted with the documentation required for submittal to the FAA for approval. ACAA sought out funding through the VALE program that would support the purchase and installation of 17 electric point-of-use pre-conditioned air (PCA) units in Concourse A of PIT. This request was the third and final VALE application for PIT what would award $9 million in federal funding to supply electrification equipment at most gates throughout each terminal, replacing the existing units that were installed over 30 years ago.

WSP, San Antonio International Airport Airfield Alternative, San Antonio, TX. Noise Modeling Lead. Chris developed the noise modeling inputs and assisted in preparing the technical memorandum for the future 2040 airport layout plan.

As part of the noise exposure map update completed in 2021, the City of San Antonio Aviation Department is evaluating noise exposure from the expansion of Runway 13R/31L and Runway 13L/31R. The expansion consists of adding 1,247- and 340-foot displaced threshold on Runway 13R and Runway 31L, respectively. The Runway 13L threshold is being moved to extend the 5,519-foot runway to 8,500 feet.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Written Re-Evaluation of the O’Hare Modernization Environmental Impact Statement or the Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Plan, Chicago, IL. Noise Modeling Lead. Chris collaborated with FAA air traffic control and Airport District Office representatives to develop representative modeled flight tracks. He led the noise modeling effort and assisted in the development of a comprehensive environmental justice analysis for three scenarios. The program proposed temporary changes in the nighttime runway use at Chicago O’Hare International Airport. The project team assisted the FAA and the Chicago Department of Aviation in determining potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Program.

Palm Beach International Airport (PBI), 2018 Annual Noise Report, West Palm Beach, FL. Project Manager. Chris provided oversight and guidance of the production modeled flight tracks, aircraft fleet mix, and runway use as well as the development of the 2018 annual PBI noise contour. Chris was responsible for preparing the technical report, which outlined the inputs used in the noise model, as well as the investigation into impacted sensitive receptors and land uses.

PBI’s annual noise study develops the noise contours for the prior year. The Palm Beach County Department of Airports uses this information to make informed decisions and to have ongoing knowledge of which communities are being affected by PBI’s operations.

City of Newport Beach, John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Departure Procedure (NADP) Study, Newport Beach, CA. Lead Analyst. Chris modeled and analyzed noise measurement data related to numerous NADP configurations. He assisted in the coordination with airport-based airlines to gather and review noise measurement data to validate noise model results. The project team reviewed the single event level SEL noise contours of all the existing NADPs as well as NADP alternatives, which included reduced thrust departures with varying altitudes at which the pilot would reconfigure flap settings. The analysis led to the implementation of a new NADP at John Wayne Airport.

PBI, Noise Monitoring Terminal (NMT) Evaluation, West Palm Beach, FL. Assistant Project Manager/Analyst. Chris developed and implemented a noise measurement protocol to assess aircraft noise events at several location in West Palm Beach. The data was analyzed to determine parameters to capture aircraft noise events and to identify an alternative location for one of PBI’s NMTs. The Palm Beach County Department of Airports needed to investigate the relocation of one NMT along Southern Boulevard. Adjacent roadway noise was contaminating the results of aircraft noise events at this location. The analysis provided recommendations for new NMT locations. 796
Luke Evans
Socioeconomics & Environmental Justice
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Luke Evans has developed a reputation throughout his 25-year career for being able to successfully manage a wide range of project types. He has managed large-scale residential, commercial, and industrial development projects in urban and rural settings, military installation master plans, utility-scale solar developments, communication site networks, and light rail transportation network extensions in urban areas. His multidisciplinary training allows him to work within a broad range of environmental fields, including biological and cultural resources management, wildland fire management, environmental conflict resolution, and general land use policy. Luke has additional expertise in the analysis and presentation of technical environmental and natural resource policy and legislation from his time serving on a legislative staff.

Relevant Experience
Sacramento Regional Housing Authority/Sacramento Regional Transit District, Twin Rivers Transit-Oriented Development and Dos Rios Light Rail Station Project, Sacramento County, CA. Project Manager. Luke successfully led a complex environmental compliance effort for a combined NEPA/CEQA document that evaluated the effects of a rehabilitated and expanded affordable housing project and construction and operation of RT’s proposed Dos Rios light rail station near the intersection of North 12th Street and Richards Boulevard. The Department of Housing and Urban Development was the federal lead agency, and the City of Sacramento and RT served as cooperating local lead agencies. The Federal Transit Administration also used the combined NEPA/CEQA document to prepare its own findings with respect to the light rail station.

Issues associated with the project were highly complex, including property acquisition, environmental justice, endangered species, cultural resources, protected trees, and site drainage and flooding.

County of El Dorado, Dorado Oaks Subdivision and State Route 49 Intersection Project, El Dorado County, CA. Project Manager. Luke is currently leading a multidisciplinary team on the EIR effort for a controversial subdivision project in unincorporated El Dorado County, which also includes construction of a roundabout intersection on State Route 49. The EIR will ultimately serve as the CEQA document for both the County’s consideration of the subdivision project, and also Caltrans’ consideration of the proposed improvements to the State Highway System. The subdivision component proposes construction of 374 residential units and associated infrastructure on a 142-acre raw land site. The intersection improvements will construct a roundabout at the subdivision project’s frontage on State Route 49. Since the project involves a significant undertaking on a State Highway, the EIR effort will require preparation of various reports for Caltrans relating to historic resources, biological resources and wetlands, hazardous materials, and traffic. Issues associated with the overall project include impacts to a designated historic landmark, a Gold Rush-era

EDUCATION
MS, Environmental Policy
and Natural Resource
Management, University
of Arizona, Tucson
BA, History and Religious
Studies, University of
Arizona, Tucson
25 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE
797
Luke Evans (Continued)
Socioeconomics & Environmental Justice
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
cemetery, sensitive biological resources, wetlands, Tribal Cultural Resources, and traffic. Other issues of concern include the project’s location with a fire hazard severity zone and emergency evacuation.

County of Sacramento, Grandpark Specific Plan EIR, Sacramento County, CA. Project Manager. Luke is currently serving as project manager for preparation of a program EIR for a 5,600-acre mixed use project in unincorporated Sacramento County. The Specific Plan envisions the construction of ±22,000 residential units, ±400 acres of commercial uses, and ±2,000 acres of parks and open space. Issues of concern include transportation and traffic, drainage and hydrology, consistency with an existing Habitat Conservation Plan, nearby Sacramento international Airport operations, and conversion of prime agricultural land.

County of Sacramento, Upper Westside Specific Plan EIR, Sacramento, CA. Project Director. Luke is overseeing the preparation of an EIR for a large mixed-use community that encompass approximately 2,066 acres in the unincorporated Natomas community of Sacramento County, approximately 3.5 miles from downtown Sacramento. The project consists of 9,356 residential units covering approximately 852 acres, about 3.1 million square feet of commercial use covering approximately 136 acres, about 146 acres of educational use, and about 74 acres pf recreational use. Key environmental issues being addressed in the EIR include aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources and tribal cultural resources, global climate change, and traffic and circulation.

County of Placer, The Park at Granite Bay Focused EIR, Placer County, CA. Senior Advisor. Luke acted as senior advisor tasked with completing a Focused Environmental Impact Report and getting it out for public circulation. This task involved careful coordination between the project applicant and County staff, and facilitating negotiations between the two parties. Issues of concern for the project included strong community opposition to the project, consistency with adopted General and Community Plans and area zoning, hydrology and drainage, noise, aesthetics, and traffic.

County of Marin, Donahue Highlands Master Plan, Marin County, CA. Project Manager. Luke served as project manager for preparation of an EIR for a proposed master plan development in an unincorporated portion of Marin County. The applicant proposed to construct 18 residences on a ridgeline overlooking the City of Sausalito. The site lies adjacent to the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. ESA’s scope has also included preparation of a comprehensive constraints analysis prior to initiation of the EIR, covering topics such as aesthetics, biological and cultural resources, geology and soils (landslides), hydrology, and traffic. The project was uniquely controversial, as it would develop one of the last remaining ridgelines in southern Marin County.

County of Napa, Inn at the Abbey EIR, Napa, CA. Senior Reviewer, Wildfire. ESA is preparing an EIR for development of a 79-room hotel in multiple buildings on a 15-acre site owned by Jackson Family Vineyards north of St. Helena in unincorporated Napa County. The project would preserve an existing stone building (currently a winery/restaurant) and demolish other structures on the site with the exception of six residential dwelling units, which would be used for employee housing. Luke reviewed the EIR's Wildfire chapter for quality, made revisions and corrections, and strengthened the section's CEQA defensibility.
798
Michael Burns, CHG, CEG, PG, QSD
Utilities & Service Systems
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Michael Burns is a highly skilled and effective project manager and technical analyst with more than 30 years of experience in the environmental and geological sciences. He provides expert services in CEQA and NEPA planning and permitting, site characterization, water quality investigations, remedial investigation/feasibility studies (RI/FS), waste management, litigation support, property assessments, development and redevelopment, soil and groundwater remediation, and groundwater banking. His projects include municipal and regional water supply, industrial and manufacturing facilities, general plan updates, airports, levees, landfills, refineries, research and development facilities, hazardous waste management, vineyards, and commercial properties.

Relevant Experience
San Francisco International Airport (SFO), West of Bayshore Project, San Francisco, CA. Hazardous Materials Analyst and Hydrogeologist. As part of ongoing flood maintenance, SFO periodically removes accumulated sediment and vegetation from drainage channels along the west side of the Bayshore Freeway. Michael conducted a sediment sampling program to identify appropriate recycling or disposal of the removed sediment, and to characterize the concentrations of chemicals in sediment being transported from the City of Millbrae stormwater system into said drainage channels. Key issues included evaluating whether the levels of chemicals in sediment exceed ecological regulatory action levels.

San Francisco International Airport (SFO), CA. Hazardous Materials Analyst and Hydrogeologist. Michael has provided services for the following SFO projects:

SFO South Airport Boulevard Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Phase II Site Investigation. Task Manager. Michael conducted a Phase I environmental site assessment for this northern street section of SFO for upgrades to current road standards. The Phase 1 assessment was conducted in general accordance with the ASTM 1527 standard. The assessment included research of historical and regulatory agency records, interviews, and a site inspection. Key issues included the degraded pressure-treated wood posts and guardrails along pone portion of the road. Michael conducted sampling of soil beneath the guardrails and determined that soil had not been contaminated with wood preservative chemicals. However, the soil is contaminated with lead from historical use of leaded gasoline and will require management as hazardous waste.

SFO North Field Road Parking Area Phase II Site Investigation. Task Manager. Michael conducted a Phase II drilling and soil sampling investigation for this northern portion of SFO to investigate whether redevelopment of the area might encounter contaminated soil from historical uses. The investigation consisted of six soil borings, the collection of various soil samples, and the analysis for petroleum hydrocarbons and metals. The results were compared to regulatory action levels and determined that soil had not been contaminated above actin levels.

EDUCATION
BS, Geology, San José
State University, 1980
30+ YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
Certified Hydrogeologist
(CHG), No.280, CA, 1995
Certified Engineering
Geologist (CEG), No.1846,
CA, 1993
Professional Geologist
(PG), No.4532, CA, 1989
Qualified SWPPP
Developer (QSD) #PG4532

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Bay Planning Coalition,
Dredging and Beneficial
Reuse Committee
799
Michael Burns, CHG, CEG, PG, QSD (Continued)
Utilities & Service Systems
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
SFO West Field Cargo Area Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Task Manager. Michael conducted a Phase I environmental site assessment for this western portion of SFO for the redevelopment of airport cargo and support areas.

The Phase 1 assessment was conducted in general accordance with the ASTM 1527 standard. The assessment included research of historical and regulatory agency records, interviews, and a site inspection. Key issues included fuel and oil releases from former USTs, and former and current aircraft loading uses that could affect redevelopment of the area.

SFO Boarding Area H Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Task Manager. Michael conducted a Phase I environmental site assessment for this western portion of SFO for the redevelopment of airport cargo and support areas.

The Phase 1 assessment was conducted in general accordance with the ASTM 1527 standard. The assessment included research of historical and regulatory agency records, interviews, and a site inspection. Key issues included fuel and oil releases from former and current aircraft loading uses that could affect redevelopment of the area.

SFO Shoreline Protection Program Project. SFO proposes to implement the SFO Shoreline Protection Program to address flood protection and future sea level rise for the expected lifespan of the shoreline improvements. It will install new shoreline protection infrastructure that would comply with current Federal Emergency Management Administration requirements for flood protection and incorporate protection for future sea level rise. The project will construct shoreline protection improvements to eliminate the probability of substantial inundation at the Airport until 2085. Michael analyzed hazards and hazardous materials issues relative to the proposed project.

Landrum & Brown and Marin County, Gnoss Field Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, Novato, CA. Project Manager, Hydrogeologist, Mineral Resources, and Hazardous Materials Analyst. Michael provided planning services to assist Marin County and the FAA with NEPA and CEQA analysis for the proposed 1,100-foot extension of Runway 13/31 of the Gnoss Field Airport into a disturbed wetland and former agricultural area. A combined Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report was prepared to comply with NEPA and CEQA, respectively, and described and analyzed the affected environment and potential impacts of the proposed project within the affected area. Successful extension of Runway 13/31 will enable Gnoss Field Airport to handle modern aircraft and improve the safety of the airport.
800
Priya Finnemore
Regulatory Permitting
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Priya Finnemore is a senior Regulatory Specialist and Project Manager with more than 24 years experience providing guidance and representation on the suite of environmental permits required for projects involving waters, wetlands, and associated resources at the state and federal level. Priya started her career as a federal regulator, with more than 6 years as a Regulator with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), processing permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, as well as conducting interagency coordination under the many related state and federal environmental laws. As a consultant, Priya has prepared and negotiated permits and approvals for a wide range of project types and scales, in accordance with Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act, Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code, the Porter-Cologne Act, Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act, Sections 2080/1 of the California Endangered Species Act, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, and the Coastal Zone Management Act. Priya also has experience navigating the more complex Individual Permit process (for the USACE), including preparation of alternatives analyses in compliance with the 404(b)(1) Guidelines.

Priya has also prepared documentation for environmental impact assessment and mitigation measures in compliance with CEQA/ NEPA.

Relevant Experience
Port of San Francisco, As-Needed Environmental and Related Professional Services, City and County of San Francisco, CA. Project Manager and Regulatory Permitting Lead.

Priya served as Project Manager and permitting lead in pursuit of required regulatory permits and authorizations for two projects under an as-needed on-call agreement between Weiss Associates and the Port of San Francisco: 1) Programmatic Permitting for Port-Wide Maintenance (which included obtaining a Regional General Permit, or RGP, specific to the Port of San Francisco’s maintenance needs); and the Crane Cove Park Project (within the Pier 70 Master Plan area). Both projects required permits from the USACE, the RWQCB, and San Francisco BCDC; consultations with the USFWS and NMFS; and coordination under Section 106 of the NHPA. The RGP was designed to streamline the Port’s environmental approval process for routine activities over a 5-10 year period, and required preparation of an Alternatives Analysis in compliance with the 404(b)(1) Guidelines. For both projects, Priya was involved with presentations at the USACE’s monthly Interagency meetings and collaborated with Port staff to prepare and submit permit applications and supporting technical and baseline studies (including Biological Assessments and Cultural Resource Reports). As of 2017, the Port was involved in ongoing agency negotiations for the Crane Cove Park Project permits, and the Port had successfully obtained all approvals including the new RGP 22 for Port-wide Maintenance, as issued by the USACE’s San Francisco District.

EDUCATION
MA, Geography, emphasis
in Coastal
Geomorphology, UCLA
BA, Geography, emphasis
in Physical Geography,
UCLA
24 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

TRAINING
Wetland Delineation
PROSPECT course, USACE
USACE Courses:

Endangered Species
Act/Essential Fish Habitat
(ESA/EFH);
Hydrogeomorphic Method
(HGM), and Scope of
Analysis
Continuing Legal
Education (CLE) –
California Wetlands –
Insight from Policymakers
& Regulators (2014, 2016)
801
Priya Finnemore (Continued)
Regulatory Permitting
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge (SFOBB) Marine Foundation Demolition, Oakland, CA. Permitting and Compliance Support. Priya worked with the Kiewit Infrastructure West Co./Caltrans project team, to move this unique project forward from planning through permitting, and to implementation in the fall of 2015. Priya assisted in the preparation of a regulatory permitting Project Description for controlled implosion of the Pier E3 marine foundation as a demonstration project, and assisted in developing the Alternatives Analysis to demonstrate how the preferred controlled implosion method, an alternative to mechanical demolition, was the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) for the removal of the Pier E3 marine foundation of the SFOBB, in compliance with the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) Guidelines. The project required a highly-complex regulatory effort, involving numerous agency jurisdictions, overlapping authorities, and a wide range of aquatic resources. In addition, the project and its associated environmental review required a high degree of technical analysis, much of which was incorporated into regulatory permitting submittals. Caltrans obtained all approvals, and successfully conducted the demonstration project in late 2015; since that time, Caltrans successfully continued this superior method for additional marine foundation removal in 2016 in 2017.

City of San Francisco and America’s Cup Event Authority, 34th America's Cup EIR/EA and Permitting, San Francisco, CA. Regulatory Permitting Specialist. Priya contributed to the preparation of regulatory permitting applications and documentation for the multi-year, high profile America’s Cup race. The project required a highlycomplex regulatory effort, including numerous agency jurisdictions, overlapping authorities, and a wide range of aquatic resources. Priya assisted in the coordination of multiple Interagency Working Group meetings to solicit ongoing agency input into the project evolution and regulatory review process, leading to the successful and timely permitting of the high-profile sporting events which took place in 2012-2013.

Golden Gate Bridge and Highway Transportation District (GGBHTD), Ferry Terminal Facility Improvements, Sausalito and San Francisco, CA. Regulatory Permit Specialist. Priya is responsible for the preparation of permit applications and negotiating compensatory mitigation in pursuit of permits and approvals pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (USACE), Section 401 Certification (RWQCB), the San Francisco Bay Plan and Coastal Zone Management Act (BCDC), and the Dredged Material Management Office (DMMO), for the modification and improvement of ferry terminal facilities at both Sausalito and San Francisco. Priya and the ESA team are supporting the Federal Transit Administration’s coordination with the CDFW, USFWS, and NMFS, for potential project impacts to aquatic species and habitat, while ensuring consistency between permitting and the preparation of CEQA/NEPA documentation, also by the ESA team. To support project success, Priya led in the development of a creative mitigation solution for the ferry terminal projects, to address the dearth of open water/Essential Fish Habitat (and eelgrass) mitigation actions in the Bay.

East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Happy Valley Pipeline Project, Orinda, CA. Regulatory Permitting Specialist. Priya was responsible for overseeing the preparation of a Biological Habitat Assessment and Jurisdictional Delineation, followed by providing comprehensive permitting services for the Happy Valley Pipeline Project, one of 20 projects analyzed in the District’s Water Treatment and Transmission Improvements Program (WTTIP) EIR, for which ESA prepared a Supplemental EIR and permit applications. The project included pipeline replacement in a constrained alignment within a residential community the City of Orinda. ESA also provided additional traffic, geotechnical, and biological analyses to support modifications to the pipeline alignment and pipeline construction methods. The pipeline project was delayed in order to enable concurrent construction with an associated pumping plant facility, and is currently planned for completion in 2018.
802
Neal Wolfe, JD, SFP, CEM
Sustainability
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Neal has 22 years of experience in airport asset and facilities management, airfield, air quality, noise, environmental, sustainability, resilience, and energy planning. He has extensive experience in air quality and noise modeling, developing sustainability management plans, and preparing state and federal environmental grant funding opportunities. He is also highly experienced in performing geometric glint and glare studies related to solar photovoltaic arrays, developing new and analyzing existing aircraft arrival and departure procedures, and solving environmentally based scientific and legal problems. Neal’s diverse experience with successfully negotiating a wide variety of airport-related technical, organizational, and relationship challenges makes him ideally suited to lead large and complex planning projects. Before his career in consulting, Neal served as a team leader in the U.S. Army Rangers, where he participated in multiple overseas deployments with distinction.

Relevant Experience
PANYNJ, Newark Liberty International Airport, End Around Taxiway/Airfield Planning, Newark, NJ. Project Manager. Neal served as the on-site project manager to assist PANYNJ in assessing the feasibility of constructing an end-around taxiway (EAT) at the Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR). His duties included: analyzing existing and future airfield delays and impacts associated with increasing arrival and departure rates using the Total Airspace and Airport Modeler tool; altering 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces through an FAA-approved Modification of Standards; construction cost estimating; scheduling and phasing of construction activities to minimize airfield impacts; identifying new opportunities to accommodate displaced passenger and employee parking; and assessing potential environmental impacts. The EAT project also included the development of new performance-based navigation arrival and departure procedures using the TARGETS model to enhance airfield and airspace efficiency and safety. While managing the EAT project involved solving a number of technical challenges, it was navigating the complex intra- and inter-organizational challenges that presented the greatest barriers to the project’s overall success. Neal was able to build a consensus of shared understanding by bringing a wide variety of stakeholders to the table, which included: key EWR-based and PANYNJ staff, such as operations, planning, parking, and engineering; EWR air traffic control tower and New York Terminal Radar Approach Control personnel; FAA; and United Airlines.

Amazon Prime Air, EAs for Commercial Drone Delivery, Various Locations. Project Manager. Neal is currently assisting Amazon Prime Air to prepare EAs, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), so that they can secure Part 135 Operations Specification approval to conduct commercial drone delivery services. The scope of environmental analyses includes detailed assessments of potential impacts to biological resources, historic resources, noise and land use, Section 4(f) properties, and environmental justice communities. Agency consultation efforts include a wide variety of

EDUCATION
JD, Salmon P. Chase
College of Law
MS, Biochemistry and
Molecular Genetics,
University of Cincinnati
22 YEARS OF

EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATIONS
Sustainability Facility
Professional (SFP), 2019
Certified Energy Manager
(CEM), 2022

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Airports Council
International – North
America (ACI-NA)
American Association of
Airport Executives (AAAE)
International Facility
Management Association
(IFMA)
Airport Maximo User’s
Group (AMUG)
U.S. Green Building
Council (USGBC)
803
Neal Wolfe, JD, SFP, CEM (Continued)
Sustainability
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
state and federal regulatory agencies, including state and tribal historic preservation offices, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and state coastal zone management agencies. Because noise emissions from drones have not been certificated by FAA, he led a team of acoustic experts to establish noise levels and sound exposure. Neal successfully secured FONSI/RODs for drone projects at College Station, Texas, and Tolleson, Arizona, in 2022 and 2024, and is actively working with Prime Air at more than 30 other locations across the country.

City/County of San Francisco, Sustainability Management Plan, San Francisco, CA. Technical Lead. Neal led the data collection and technical analysis effort that served as the foundation for the sustainability management plan for the San Francisco International Airport (SFO). He was also instrumental in the ideation of novel and cutting-edge solutions to address priorities for energy, emissions, and waste reductions, many of which were ultimately implemented in subsequent planning efforts, as documented in SFO’s Zero Waste, Net Zero Energy, Zero Net Carbon plans.

City of San Jose, Sustainability Management Plan, San Jose, CA. Technical Lead. Neal led the effort to collect and analyze a comprehensive set of data related to utility and resource consumption and disposal at the San Jose Mineta International Airport (SJC), which he then used to define targets and set goals for performance for energy, carbon emissions, and solid/organic waste management. He was also an active leader in the stakeholder engagement process, which included outreach sessions with internal staff, tenants, and local officials.

Ontario International Airport Authority (OIAA), Sustainability Program Development, Ontario, CA. Project Manager.

Neal is currently assisting OIAA to develop a comprehensive suite of initiatives to integrate sustainability and resiliencebased projects at the Ontario International Airport (ONT). More than two dozen conceptual project ideas have been developed and analyzed, which include projects that reduce carbon emissions, conserve energy, transition conventional vehicles to electric, increase employee and passenger well-being, and promote green purchasing and leasing. Captured in the Environmental and Sustainability Opportunities Guidebook, the projects are assessed based on potential viability, capital and maintenance costs, environmental benefits, and alignment with current and proposed capital projects. Neal will also be assisting with the development of a “scoring” rubric that can be used to assess capital projects and track long-term commitment and success of OIAA priorities.

Broward County Aviation Department (BCAD), Environmental Planning and Acoustical Consulting Services, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Project Manager for Sustainability and Resilience Planning. Neal is currently assisting BCAD in developing a series of initiatives intended to increase the sustainability and resilience of the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL) and North Perry Airport (HWO). As part of their sustainability planning efforts, BCAD is seeking closer alignment with the local and regional planning efforts to effectively address the impacts associated with climate change and ensure operational resilience. Neal is assisting the organization in identifying risks and threats to all critical lines of airport business, including planning, maintenance, operations, security, finance, human resources, and environmental. As these risks and vulnerabilities are clearly identified, he will be working with departmental managers to effectively address them through targeted risk control plans. Other projects he is leading include a comprehensive solar PV master plan study for both FLL and HWO, Airport Carbon Accreditation Level 1 certification for both FLL and HWO, and campus-wide ASHRAE Level 2 energy audits for all of FLL’s facilities. The results of the solar study and energy audits will help BCAD better inform their capital improvement plan priorities by ensuring that funding is allocated to projects that most effectively enhance operational resilience. To ensure alignment with Broward County and BCAD strategic priorities, Neal has facilitated discussions with external stakeholders and led numerous sustainability and resilience working group sessions to ensure all internal stakeholder concerns are heard and addressed. 804
Frank (Eryn) Pimentel, GISP
GIS
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Eryn Pimentel is a GIS analyst whose expertise lies in spatial analysis, map design, and production. His experience centers primarily on visualizing spatial data using digital and manual drafting techniques. Eryn uses a variety of systems and software, including Esri ArcGIS, Adobe Creative Suite, Google products, and GPS. His project work has covered subjects including land use planning, biological resources, parks and recreation, development, energy, transportation, restoration, water resources, and environmental impact analyses, primarily in California. Eryn’s interests include cartography and human geography.

Relevant Experience
San Francisco International Airport (SFO), Shoreline Protection Program Project EIR, San Francisco, CA. GIS Analyst. Eryn is currently supporting a complex EIR for SFO’s Shoreline Protection Program Project, which looks to armor the approximately 8-mile coastline around SFO in order to accommodate sea-level rise through end of century. Eryn is preparing maps and analyses for various sections of the project working closely with ESA’s in-house team.

San Francisco International Airport, SFO As-Needed CEQA Services, San Francisco, CA. GIS Analyst. ESA is supporting the ongoing development and delivery of various CEQA addenda, technical reports, permitting documents, and other services for SFO. As GIS Analyst, Eryn is supporting these efforts with mapping, survey data collection, geospatial data management, calculations, and figure production.

Port of San Francisco, Waterfront Plan Update Project EIR or IS/MND, San Francisco, CA. GIS Analyst. Eryn assisted with the Port of San Francisco’s Waterfront Plan Update Project, which included amendments and updates to the Waterfront Land Use Plan (WLUP)—the governing policy document for the Port’s approximately 7.5-mile waterfront property. The Plan updates focus on advancing new goals and policies in the areas of waterfront resilience, environmental sustainability, financial strength, and continued public engagement. Depending on the level of updates to the Plan, the project will result in either an IS/MND or an EIR. Eryn provided mapping support for this project.

City of Sacramento, Central City Specific Plan, Sacramento, CA. GIS Analyst. Eryn served as the GIS analyst for the preparation of a specific plan for the Central City area of Sacramento, including the Broadway corridor. The key objectives of the specific plan were to facilitate achievement of the City’s downtown housing initiative which seeks to result in the construction of 10,000 new housing units over the coming decade, as well as to create a planning regulatory framework that facilitates transit-oriented development along the City’s proposed Downtown-Riverfront Streetcar project. The specific plan focuses on creating development-ready parcels in the downtown area, including CEQA coverage sufficient to support expedited housing and mixed-use construction. Eryn prepared maps

EDUCATION
BA, Geography, Humboldt
State University
Certificate of Study, GIS
and Remote Sensing,
Humboldt State
University
BA, Art, Humboldt State
University
17 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
GIS Professional (GISP)
Certification, GIS
Certification Institute,
2014

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
North American
Cartographic Information
Society
805
Frank (Eryn) Pimentel, GISP (Continued)
GIS
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
and compiled data for these efforts, as well as managed a land use survey using mobile data collection tools in an online web map environment.

Sacramento Convention Center Expansion EIR, Sacramento, CA. GIS Analyst. The City of Sacramento planned an expansion to the Sacramento Convention Center. ESA prepared an EIR to analyze the environmental impacts of the Convention Center expansion. Key issues considered in the analyses included land use compatibility and effects related to production of light and glare. Eryn supported this effort with mapping, mobile data collection, and spatial analyses.

Napa County, 2025 Baseline Data Report, Napa County, CA. GIS Analyst. The Baseline Data Report (BDR) intends to catalog and assess baseline environmental conditions throughout the Napa County on various resource topics. ESA is providing full planning and implementation support for this project, from data-gathering to report and application development for public viewing. Eryn provided GIS data management and mapping support for this effort.

Stonestown Development Project, San Francisco, CA. GIS Analyst. The project includes the development of nearly 3,500 residential units, new retail, office, hotel, open space, and infrastructure improvements, as well as including areas for cultural, institutional, and educational uses. The EIR analyzed one variant to the project, which included the development of the Authentic Church parcel. Under the Authentic Church Variant, the redevelopment of the 27 acres surrounding the Stonestown Galleria would be the same as the project; however, the Authentic Church parcel would be developed with an additional 150 residential units; 10,000 square feet of cultural, institutional, and educational uses; and 200 parking spaces. Eryn prepared figures and compiled data for this effort.

Downtown Railyard Venture, LLC., Sacramento Railyards Specific Plan Update, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Major League Soccer Stadium, & Stormwater Outfall Subsequent EIR, Sacramento, CA. GIS Analyst. ESA prepared a Subsequent EIR (SEIR) for the 2016 update to the Railyards Specific Plan, including consideration of a new Kaiser Permanente Medical Center and a multi-purpose soccer and entertainment stadium intended to house a new Major League Soccer franchise. An update of the specific plan for the Railyards approved in 2007, the 2016 Railyards Specific Plan Update refined the planned land uses and infrastructure that will result in the long-awaited development of the historic Sacramento Railyards. Eryn prepared figures for the SEIR concerning multi-modal circulation, noise from stadium and helicopter operations, sensitive biological issues, public services, and hazardous materials, as well as provided impact calculations for permitting of the associated stormwater outfall.

Department of Water Resources Grizzly Slough Floodplain Restoration Project. GIS Analyst. 2015-present.The Grizzly Slough Floodplain Restoration project is a restoration project located at the confluences of Grizzly Slough and Bear Slough with the Cosumnes River. This project has been in development for over a decade, including earlier biological resources reports by ESA, hydrology modeling conducted by PWA, and installation of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 restoration areas in the northern part of the site. Eryn is part of an interdisciplinary team reviewing the existing biotic and abiotic conditions, project goals, and resource constraints to develop a Restoration Plan that will restore riparian floodplain habitat while providing flood protection to neighboring properties. Eryn provided mapping support and spatial analyses for the baseline biological surveys, site assessment, and conceptual restoration design. 806
807
808
1 Kirk Nielsen, PE
Program Director
Kirk has been managing complex airport projects and programs since 1996. Prior to joining Jviation, Kirk served as Program Manager and Aeronautical Planner for the Utah Department of Transportation’s Division of Aeronautics (UDOT Aeronautics). He supervised the state’s airport grant program and airport development throughout Utah from 2003 to August 2012. While working for UDOT, he served as Project Manager on the State System Plan, Programmatic Sensitive Species Habitat Management Plan, and the yearly CIP.

Kirk is the Office Manager of Woolpert’s St. George office. He a Project Manager and Project Liaison for Woolpert, and he coordinates all the CIPs with the states and FAA for the Jviation clients in Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, and Utah.

Project Experience
Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) Master Plan, Lake Tahoe Airport—South Lake Tahoe, CA. Client Liaison. The last comprehensive airport master plan for TVL was completed in 2016. The airport sponsor contracted Woolpert to update the master plan and airport layout plan (ALP) in 2023. The update analyzed current conditions and facilities, anticipated travel demand, and identified the projects required to meet that need. Woolpert worked closely with TVL staff, the South Lake Tahoe community, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Aeronautics Division, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to deliver an actionable plan that effectively guides the airport’s growth.

Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) Apron Rehabilitation – Phase V—South Lake Tahoe, CA. Project Manager. This project consisted of design and construction oversight for the reconstruction of the north general aviation ramp near Taxiway H and pavement rehabilitation on C19 and C20.

St. George Regional Airport (SGU) Runway Reconstruction—St. George, UT. Client Manager. Designed the reconstruction of the 9,300 – foot runway that was plagued with heaving due to the blue clay materials underneath the existing runway. The design required crews to excavate 5,400 feet of the existing runway’s footprint to a depth of 17 feet. After that, the excavated clay was “conditioned” on-site by mixing the blue clay with water until it reached the correct moisture level. The conditioned clay was then re-poured and used to plug and prevent future heaving in the new runway.

St. George Regional Airport (SGU) Terminal Expansion, St. George Regional Airport—St. George, UT. Serving as Program Manager for the terminal expansion project, Kirk oversees the design effort that will double the size of the existing terminal and add four new gates with jet bridges. He leads a multidisciplinary delivery team that includes architects; civil, structural, and mechanical engineers (covering fire protection, HVAC, and baggage systems); interior designers; cost estimators; and a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR).

As part of assembling the delivery team, Kirk also managed the implementation of the CMAR selection process. The project recently achieved the 50% design milestone, accompanied by a reconciled estimate between the CMAR and an independent third-party estimator. Final design completion is expected in the coming months, with construction scheduled to begin this fall.

St. George Regional Airport (SGU) Apron Layout, St. George Regional Airport—St. George, UT. Project Director responsible for overseeing layout modifications to improve aircraft movement and parking on the general aviation apron. The FBO requested these

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
30 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Engineer, UT, ID, NV

EDUCATION
Master of Business Administration
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering
809
2 changes to better support their growing operational needs. Tie-down configurations were revised to accommodate additional aircraft, and new taxilane markings were added to support the updated layout. Woolpert led both the design and construction phases of the project.

Carbon County Municipal Airport (PUC) Master Plan— Price, UT. Program Director who oversaw the planning efforts, which included an existing-conditions inventory, aviation activity forecasts, an airport layout plan, terminal area requirements, design studies, and an analysis of alternatives.

Elko Regional Airport (EKO) Master Plan—Elko, NV. Project Director supporting the development of a master plan for a commercial service airport serving both general aviation and commercial operations. The master plan included operations and enplanement forecasting, runway length analyses, the airport layout plan, terminal area requirements, design studies, and an alternatives analysis.

In addition, the runway safety area (RSA) and obstacle-free area (OFA) were evaluated and determined to be deficient. The plan included mitigation strategies to correct these conditions.

Cedar City Regional Airport (CDC) Taxiway A, C, and Apron Rehabilitation—Cedar City, UT. Project Director. Completed the design and construction oversight for the rehabilitation of Taxiway’s C pavement from the south end of the terminal ramp to Taxiway. The project also included rehabilitating the south and center apron, including pavement, drainage, and electrical design.

Cedar City Regional Airport (CDC) Terminal Apron Hardstand and Asphalt Rehabilitation and Taxiway D Pavement Maintenance— Cedar City, UT. Project Director. Completed the design and construction oversight for constructing a new concrete hardstand to be utilized for parking for Skywest and charter jets. The project required the rehabilitation of the remainder of the apron (122,135 square feet). Pavement maintenance was also completed for Taxiway D for the project.

Elko Regional Airport (EKO) Runway 5/23 Rehabilitation—Elko, NV. Client Manager. Provided design and construction services to rehabilitate Runway 5/23. The existing surface was milled and rehabilitated. Runway shoulders, 25 feet on both sides were constructed with approximately 12 inches of crushed aggregate base course and 3 inches of asphalt surface course. Lighting and signage were designed as required in the runway environment and new Runway Distance Remaining Signs (RDR’s) were installed at new locations along Runway 5/23 as the current locations do not accurately reflect the displaced threshold.

Provo Airport (PVU) Runway 13/31 Rehabilitation—Provo, UT; Client/UDOT Liaison. Provided design and construction services for the rehabilitation of Runway 13/31. In order to maintain the Airport and Runway 13/31 operations to the maximum extent possible, a complex construction phasing plan was developed to mitigate the overall effect of construction activities to the Airport. The project included demolition, asphalt paving, striping, and electrical work of the entire runway, and was completed in five phases.

Elko Regional Airport (EKO) Airfield Lighting and Signage—Elko, NV. Client Manager. This project consisted of replacing existing runway and taxiway guidance signs with new LED signs and installing a new power circuit for the runway and taxiway signs. An existing spare constant current regulator was used as the power source for the new signage circuit. New control wiring and relay logic was designed for the new circuit. Also included was the relocation of the holding position paint and signs on connector taxiways for Runway 5/23. Also included was the installation of new signage on airport perimeter roads at various locations where the roads intersect aircraft movement areas.

Wendover Airport (ENV) Runway 8/26 Runway Extension—Wendover, UT. Project Liaison. This project consists of extending Runway 8/26 approximately 2,000 feet to the east from the threshold of the approach end of Runway 26, including runway pavement, inlets, lighting, signage, striping, construction traffic control, airfield access and phasing. 810
1 Tony Davis
Senior Aviation Planner
Tony has been an aviation consultant since 1994, providing master planning, system planning, and economic impact analysis to airport and state clients throughout the country. For most of his career, he has served as a senior aviation project manager for airport planning projects and has led dozens of airport master plans throughout the United States and was responsible for all phases of the planning process. His development of short-, medium-, and long-term alternative concepts assist airports in understanding the phased construction of airport infrastructure while maintaining critical components of airfield operation, terminal and landside facilities.

Project Experience
Lake Tahoe Airport (TVL) Master Plan, Lake Tahoe Airport—South Lake Tahoe, CA. Environmental Lead. The last comprehensive airport master plan for TVL was completed in 2016. The airport sponsor contracted Woolpert to update the master plan and airport layout plan (ALP) in 2023. The update analyzed current conditions and facilities, anticipated travel demand, and identified the projects required to meet that need. Woolpert worked closely with TVL staff, the South Lake Tahoe community, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Aeronautics Division, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to deliver an actionable plan that effectively guides the airport’s growth.

Airport Master Plan, Colorado Springs Airport (2020-present)—Colorado Springs, Colorado. The City of Colorado Springs is the second most populous city in Colorado and has recently experienced significant growth that is forecasted to continue at an unprecedented rate. In 2021, Jviation initiated a new airport master plan to address the growth. The plan ensures FAA design standards are met so proposed improvements remain eligible for federal AIP grants and also included an in-depth analysis and alternative development discussions to decouple the runways and address a significant hotspot on the airfield. In addition, the team developed an innovative Story Map to present study findings and collect public input in an interactive, online format. The airport master plan developed new airport noise contours based on forecasted activity levels and overall airport capacity.

Airport Master Plan, Wendover Airport (2018-present)—Wendover, Utah. Wendover Airport (ENV) is an important transportation facility for Wendover, Utah and the northeastern Nevada and northwestern Utah region. The last airport master plan was prepared in 1999 and ENV was required to complete a new airport master plan to stay eligible for future federal airport improvement grants.

Many of the key issues for this plan were related to inventory of existing facilities and environmental resources as well as assessing alternative development areas and relocation areas for facilities at the airport.

Airport Master Plan, Archuleta County Airport (2019-present)—Pagosa Springs, Colorado. Archuleta County Airport (PSO) is an important transportation facility for Pagosa Springs and the southwestern Colorado region. The last master plan for PSO was completed in 2008 and only included an airport layout plan (ALP) update. A new plan was required to remain eligible for FAA grants so that PSO can continue to be an economic hub to Archuleta County.

Airport Master Plan, Southeast Colorado Regional Airport (2020-present)—Lamar, Colorado. Southeast Colorado Regional Airport (LAA) is an important transportation facility for Lamar, Colorado and the southeastern Colorado region. The previous airport master

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
30 EDUCATION
Master of Business Administration, West Chester University Bachelor of Science, Aviation Business Management, Wilmington College Associate of Science, Aeronautical Science, Northern Virginia Community College

REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATIONS
FAA Flight Certificates: Commercial (May 1994); Instrument (January 1993); Private Pilot (November 1991)
811
2 plan (AMP) for LAA was completed in 2003 and no longer addressed current conditions. A new AMP was required to continue to be eligible for FAA grants and to address future needs of airport users and the local community. The plan assessed common AMP issues as well as a wind and runway analysis on Runways 8/26 and 18/36.

Airport Master Plan Update, Elko Regional Airport (2017-2018)—Elko, Nevada. EKO’s last Airport Master Plan (AMP) was prepared in 2004, and the new Master Plan addresses the significant changes that occurred between 2004 and 2014. These changes reflect updates to the aviation industry, national and local economy, and FAA Airport Design Standards. Tony prepared the AMP study to specifically address the dynamics in the aviation industry, the impact that air service has on the local economy, and future trends and facility needs.

Airport Master Plan, Colorado Plains Regional Airport—Akron, Colorado. Tony worked with the City of Akron prepare its 20-year Master Plan and lay the necessary groundwork to grow its business and tenant base. To accomplish that goal, Tony helped establish a clear vision for the Airport and determined the appropriate steps the City should take to promote, advertise, and grow the Airport.

The project included an active project advisory committee (PAC) made up of key airport tenants/businesses and community leaders who contributed to the Airport vision.

Airport Master Plan Update, West Plains Regional Airport—West Plains, Missouri. Tony helped create a new AMP for the West Plains Regional Airport that addressed the significant changes that occurred since the previous 2001 AMP. The new plan assessed changes to local, regional, and national general aviation (GA) and commercial industry; FAA airport design standards; existing and future aviation needs; national and local economy; and the Airport’s development and operational policies.

Development Plan, Smithville-Crawford Municipal Airport (2016)—Smithville, Texas. The Airport was interested in expanding its landside and airside facilities to meet the needs of a larger cross-section of general aviation aircraft. The rapid growth of airports within the Austin, TX metroplex is pushing general aviation users to smaller airports in the surrounding communities, including Smithville. Tony created a development plan to accommodate the growing need for hangars and other basic airport facilities. Later stages of the development plan recommend a full-length parallel taxiway and runway extension to satisfy the need to accommodate turbine and jet aircraft.

Business Plan, Weslaco Mi-Valley Airport—Weslaco, Texas. As one of the country’s leading employment growth centers and a border town to Mexico, Weslaco is at a critical point to expand its infrastructure. Tony led the development of a business plan that is key to the growth and development of the region and airport. The plan identifies the Airport’s target market industries and tenants, then recommends development options that will accommodate those users. The City was interested in discontinuing public management of FBO services, so Tony evaluated options to contract FBO services to a private company. A return-on-investment (ROI) analysis was performed as a method for alternative evaluation.

Chennault International Airport, 2015 Master Plan—Lake Charles, Louisiana. This master plan focused on the development of airport landside facilities intended to expand economic development for the City of Lake Charles and the region. Key tenants of the Airport include Northrop Grumman and AAR, both of which provide maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services for very large aircraft. Tony, after detailed economic development research, made recommendations that allowed for tenant expansion as well as large and small aircraft manufacturing campuses. Local and state Economic Development Corporations can use Tony’s recommendations to draw in future prospects.

Master Plan, Garner Field (2015)—Uvalde, Texas. Tony helped produce this master plan for a highly productive and active general aviation airport, where several on-airport businesses provide aircraft MRO and interior modification services to a wide variety of corporate aircraft. The master plan helped Jviation discover that the Airport could benefit from a runway extension designed to accommodate large corporate aircraft, such as Challenger and Gulfstream. Although the runway extension was justified, Tony worked closely with Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) and the FAA to resolve significant airport geometric challenges and examine off-airport impacts. Lastly, Tony created alternative hangar development layouts to accommodate growing airport businesses and based aircraft.

Master Plan, Ruston Regional Airport (2014)—Ruston, Louisiana. Ruston Regional Airport accommodates extensive flight training operations and houses several demanding corporate aircraft. The Airport’s limited runway length limits the capacity for critical aircraft; therefore, the focus of the master plan was to study, evaluate, and justify a runway extension. Tony performed all of the technical analysis for the master plan. Significant topography issues required creative solutions to accommodate the growing number of based aircraft. Tony organized project meetings and review sessions with Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LaDOTD) and FAA staff. Thanks to Tony’s open communication, the agencies approved the runway extension, improved approach procedures, and expanded landside facilities. 812
1 Morgan Einspahr
Environmental Planner
Morgan specializes in environmental planning for aviation-related projects, including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document preparation, Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) clearances, environmental assessments, public involvement, and airport master plans. Morgan is a commercial and instrument-rated pilot and has extensive hands-on experience in airport operations and aviation planning. She has prepared numerous specialized environmental studies in support of airport improvement or development projects such as cultural resource investigations, air quality modeling, wetlands delineations, endangered species surveys, and compatible land use planning. She has also participated in several statewide aviation economic impact, system planning, and rates and charges studies. In addition to her environmental background, she has provided document control support to airport construction projects. Morgan’s broad and varied experience, coupled with her specialized knowledge of NEPA policies and processes, provides comprehensive approach to aviation and environmental planning projects.

Angelina County Airport (LFK) Taxiway Extension (Design and Bidding), Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)—Angelina County, Texas. Environmental planner responsible for leading the categorical exclusion (CATEX) required to meet National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) guidelines. Woolpert was engaged to provide engineering and design services to extend Taxiway E for runway incursion mitigation. The team completed field surveys, soil investigations, and materials testing to collect the data necessary for the design and created a preliminary engineering report, including probable costs and potential increases. Woolpert also created an updated airport layout plan (ALP).

Brownsville South Padre Island International Airport (BRO) Categorical Exclusion, Survey, and Platting for Land Acquisition for Runway 31, City of Brownsville—Brownsville, Texas. Environmental planner responsible for overseeing a Phase I environmental assessment for the acquisition of approximately 7.5 acres of land. Woolpert’s team aided BRO with the survey, categorical exclusion (CATEX), and platting for land acquisitions dedicated as expanded runway safety areas (RSA) for the reconstruction of Runway 18/36.

Woolpert’s team prepared and submitted a documented CATEX to the FAA. Woolpert’s environmental and engineering teams worked closely to prepare the environmental documentation quickly to meet grant and construction deadlines. The CATEX was approved by the FAA.

South Apron Reconstruction Design and Bidding, North Texas Regional Airport (GYI)—Grayson County, Texas. Environmental planner responsible for providing categorical exclusion (CATEX) services following current FAA guidelines along with a State Historic Preservation Office request due to the proximity of Perrin Air Force Base, an official Texas historical marker. This project consists of

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
15 EDUCATION
Master of Science, Environmental Management, University of Denver Bachelor of Science, Aviation Management, Florida Institute of Technology 813
2 the design and construction of a general aviation hangar development taxilane corridor on the south side of the airfield. This corridor will partially overlap the deteriorated south apron and create an additional access point to the parallel Taxiway A from both the main and south aprons. The project includes the reconstruction of a portion of the south apron, which is currently in poor condition, to accommodate a new 35-foot-wide taxilane. Tasks include the removal of the asphalt pavement, unclassified excavation, and subgrade preparation. The new taxilane will feature an asphalt pavement section designed to support future general aviation hangar development.

MD Helicopter E Ramp Categorial Exclusion, Falcon Field Airport —Mesa, Arizona. Morgan is overseeing the environmental documentation process and developing an environmental assessment at Falcon Field Airport. This project will assess the impacts of hangar/office development near the airport’s northeast corner.

Davcon Hangar Development Environmental Assessment, Falcon Field Airport —Mesa, Arizona. Morgan oversaw the environmental documentation process and prepared this environmental assessment that examined the impact of proposed development at Falcon Field Airport. Her efforts ensured the eventual finding of No Significant Impact was quickly delivered— enabling the significant 23-acre development project.

Statewide Airport Economic Impact Study, Wyoming Department of Transportation, Aeronautics Division—Wyoming. Jviation has Environmental Assessment for Runway Shift, Driggs-Reed Memorial Airport—Driggs, Idaho. Completed the EA for potential impacts associated shifting the runway to the northeast. The runway shift would allow for improved safety by addressing deficiencies of the runway safety areas and bring the runway into compliance with FAA standards.

Various Environmental Clearance and Coordination Projects, St. George Regional Airport—St. George, Utah. Numerous environmental clearance and coordination projects have been completed at the St. George Regional Airport. Most notably, these include the environmental documentation and extensive cultural resource coordination as part of the airport master plan update; a documented CATEX for a pavement maintenance and drainage improvement projects, to include specific coordination with the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers; a documented CATEX for the newly constructed SRE building; documented CATEX for various hangar development projects, and coordination of threatened and endangered species surveys. Woolpert has also assisted, as needed, for coordination of development projects with the FAA.

Various Environmental Clearance and Coordination Projects, Cedar City Regional Airport—Cedar City, Utah. Jviation has completed many environmental clearance documents for the Cedar City Regional Airport in the recent past. Most notably, a CATEX was completed for the rehabilitation of Runway 2-20; this CATEX included significant coordination with the FAA, and subconsultants performing cultural and biological resource surveys. The project included numerous onsite changes and required timely coordination. Woolpert also completed the necessary CATEX and Environmental Assessment (EA) required for the installation of the new airport perimeter fence and relocation of a pond dike. The EA was expedited to meet FAA deadlines and completed in a timely manner. In addition to these projects, ongoing environmental coordination for various construction and development projects continues to be completed.

Environmental Document for Terminal Development, Provo Airport—Provo, Utah. The ongoing terminal development project required extensive environmental documentation; through extensive coordination with the FAA, the project was able to be cleared through a documented CATEX and in a timely manner to meet FAA deadlines. The project included numerous special resource surveys, permits through the USACE, and ongoing coordination throughout the construction of the project. Jviation also completed various documented CATEX for hangar development projects occurring throughout airport property, several of which, included the documentation and coordination of historic hangars. Woolpert acts as the liaison between the airport and FAA for ongoing environmental coordination.

Environmental Assessment, Durango-La Plata County Regional Airport—Durango, Colorado. This EA evaluated potential impacts associated with the proposed terminal identified and studied in the 2016 Master Plan. The Master Plan’s preferred alternative was to relocate the terminal to the undeveloped east side. The EA also evaluated other alternatives including a no action, renovation and expansion plan, and construction of a new terminal on the west side. A significant aspect of the study required Morgan to coordinate with the Southern Ute Tribe, as the Airport is located within that tribe’s reservation. Analyses of wetlands, cultural resources, biotic, noise, air quality, and traffic were included in the EA. 814

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
BUDGET
Estimated fees (not to exceed) $_Negotiated during contract amendments Hourly Rate: $_Please see attached schedule of hourly rates Travel and out-of-pocket expenses $_N/A
(travel is included in the TOTAL (not to exceed amount) TOTAL (not to exceed) $ Negotiated during contract amendments

TIMELINE
Contract starts on June 1, 2026 and ends on May 31, 2031. 815
1 EXHIBIT B
Environmental Science Associates &
Subsidiaries: 2026 Schedule of Fees
I. Personnel Category Rates
Charges will be made at the Category hourly rates set forth below for time spent on project management, consultation or meetings related to the project, field work, report preparation and review, travel time, etc. Time spent on projects in litigation, in d epositions and providing expert testimony will be charged at the Category rate times 1.5.

LABOR CATEGORY BILLING
STEP I

BILLING

STEP II

BILLING

STEP III

BILLING

STEP IV

BILLING
STEP V

BILLING

STEP VI
Project Technician $86 $109 $131 $150 $170 $194
Consultant $116 $130 $144 $160 $173 $188
Associate Consultant $154 $170 $184 $198 $213 $228
Senior Consultant $171 $189 $212 $234 $257 $279
Managing Consultant $205 $228 $253 $277 $301 $324
Principal Consultant $222 $253 $282 $311 $341 $370
Senior Principal
Consultant
$261 $288 $317 $347 $379 $409
A. The range of rates shown for each staff category reflects ESA staff qualifications, expertise and experience levels. These rate ranges allow our project managers to assemble the best project teams to meet the unique project requirements and client expectat ions for each opportunity.

B. From time to time, ESA retains outside professional and technical labor on a temporary basis to meet peak workload demands. Such contract labor may be charged at regular Employee Category rates.

C. ESA reserves the right to revise the Personnel Category Rates periodically to reflect changes in its operating costs.

II. Subcontracts
Subcontract services will be invoiced at cost multiplied by 1.15.

III. Other
The fees above do not include sales tax. Any applicable or potential sales tax will be charged when appropriate.

IV. Payment Terms
Unless otherwise agreed in writing, ESA will submit invoices on a monthly basis. Any unpaid balances shall draw interest at one and one half percent (1.5%) per month or the highest rate allowed by law, whichever is lower, commencing thirty (30) days after date of invoice. All invoices not contested in writing within fifteen (15) business days of receipt are deemed accepted by Client as true and accurate and Client thereafter waives any objection to Clients invoices, which are payable in full.
816
ESA 2026 Schedule of Fees
2 V. ESA Expenses
A. Travel Expenses

1. Transportation
a. Company vehicle – fixed rate + fee for mileage in excess of 100 miles. b. Common carrier or car rental – actual expense multiplied by 1.15 c. If company vehicle is to be used in off -road conditions, a daily $1 5 use fee will be added to the standard daily vehicle rate.

2. Lodging, meals and related travel expenses – direct expenses multiplied by 1.15 B. Technology and Data Management Fee
Starting January 2023, ESA implemented a 3% Technology and Data Management fee on all applicable contracts, excluding charges related to equipment rentals, reimbursable expenses, and subcontractor fees. This fee plays a pivotal role in mitigating an array of technology and data management expenditures incurred by ESA to ensure the delivery of the comprehensive and high -quality services our clients expect. These expenses include, but are not limited to:

1. Long -Term Data Retention and Security Administration: Covering the expenses associated with administering the protection of client data and assets throughout and beyond the contractual period.

2. Development and Maintenance of Internal ESA Software Tools : Accounting for the ongoing investments required to create and maintain tools integral to our client engagements.

3. Data Privacy and Security Maintenance: Encompassing the costs involved in maintaining data privacy and security, including regular security audits to uphold the highest standards.

4. Advanced Technology -Related Costs: Addressing the escalating expenses associated with subscriptions for cutting -edge technical software, licenses, and cloud data services.

This fee structure enables ESA to uphold its commitment to providing clients with top -tier services while managing the ever -evolving demands of technology and data management in the work that we do.

C. Cloud-based Services

ITEM RATE/HOUR RATE/DAY RATE/WEEK RATE/MONTH
Cloud -based Services
Nearmap High Resolution Images $55/image
ArcGIS Online Hosting (Web Maps/Apps) $225
Website Hosting $200
Custom Application & Services Hosting* $300*
Modeling (GeoHECRAS, TUFLOW, Delft3D) + Drone
Processing
$7 $160 $950 $3,900
Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) Processing $13 $190 $1,120 $4,600 *includes support for database, SSL, IT support – costs vary by project. Contact software development services for firm pricing. 817
ESA 2026 Schedule of Fees
3 D. Printing/Reproduction Rates
If a weekly or monthly rate is not provided, equipment usage is billed at a daily rate.

ITEM RATE/PAGE SAMPLE PRICING
Black & White – 8.5 x 11 $0.15
Black & White – 11 x 17 $0.30
Color – 8.5 x 11 $0.50
Color – 11 x 17 $0.80
B&W – Plotter (Toner – ECO Quality) $0.50/sf 24x36 B/W CAD drawing would cost $3 per sheet B&W – Plotter (Toner – Presentation Quality) $1.25/sf 24x36 B/W CAD drawing would cost $7.50 per sheet Color – Plotter (Inkjet – ECO Quality) $2.50/sf 24x36 Color Drawing would cost $ 15 per sheet Color – Plotter (Inkjet – Presentation Quality) $5.00/sf 24x36 Color Drawing would cost $ 30 per sheet CD $10.00
Digital Photography $20.00 (up to 50 images)
All Other Items(including bindings and covers) At cost plus 10% E. Equipment Rates

ITEM RATE/DAY RATE/WEEK RATE/MONTH
Project Specific Equipment:

Vehicles – Standard size (no off -road usage) $ 115a $ 550a $ Vehicles – 4x4 /Truck (light duty) 175a
Vehicles – 4x4 /Truck (heavy duty) 200a
Vehicles – ATV 175
Noise Meter 115
Hydroacoustic Noise Monitoring Equipment 175
Satellite Phone 15 70 250
Electrofisher 350 1,750
Field Traps 50
Digital Hypsometer (Nikon) 25
Backpack Sprayer 30
360-Degree 4k Camera 35 175
High Resolution Time -Lapse Camera 20 100 350
Beach Seine 60
Block Net 30
PIT Tagging Kit 25
Underwater Light Meter 500
Otter Trawl 115
Wildlife Acoustics Bat Detector 125 400
Wildlife Trail Camera 30 100
Fiber Optic Endoscope 150 750
Spotting Scope 50 200
Sand Transport Station 460
Wind Monitoring Station 1540
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 25
Photo and Video Production Equipment:

Mirrorless Camera + Lens + SD Card $ 220 $ 550 $2000
Tripod + Camera Case 50 175 500
Lighting Equipment 20 75 250
Shotgun Microphone Kit 15 50 180
2 Person Microphone Kit 10 25 85
818
ESA 2026 Schedule of Fees
4 ITEM RATE/DAY RATE/WEEK RATE/MONTH
Topographic/Bathymetric Survey Equipment:

Total Station $ 300 $ $
UAV/Drone 300 1,500
RTK -GPS 300
RTK -GPS Smartnet Subscription 80
Hypack Survey Software 150
Laser/Auto Level 50
Single -Beam Echoshounder 175 600
Sidescan Sonar 200
Sound Velocity Profiler 75
1m GNSS Data Collection System 90 425 1,700
Sub-meter GNSS Data Collection System 120
Sub-foot Data Collection System 245
Garmin GPS or equivalent 45
Hydrologic Data Collection, Water Current, Level and Wave Measurement Equipment:

ISCO 2150 Area Velocity Flow Logger $ 50 $ 300 $ 800
SonTek IQ-Plus Area Velocity Flow Logger 100 500 1,500
Logging Rain Gage 10 50 200
Hand-Held Current Meter 50
Surface Velocity Radar 50
Wave Pressure Sensor 115 460
Wave Buoy 175 700
Sonic Wave Sensor 35 175 500
Logging Water Level - Pressure Transducer 125
Logging Barometric Pressure Logger 60
Well Probe / Water Level Meter 25
Bottom-Mounted Tripod / Mooring 30 150 400
Stormwater Crest Sampler 20
ADCP Riverboard 700
Radar Wave Sensor with Logger Box 150 300 1000
Boats:

Small Watercraft $ 100 $ 400
15’-17’ Boat 375 1,500
18’-21’ Boat 450 2,000
22’-25’ Boat 550 2,250
Houseboat Floating Laboratory 4,500
Water Quality Equipment:

Logging Turbidimeter/Water Level Recorder $ $ $ 400
Logging Conductivity/Water Level Recorder 250
Remote Monitoring Logger Box 75 250
Recording Conductivity Meter w/Datalogger 20 60 200
Hand-Held Turbidimeter 50 200
Hand-Held Salinity Meter or pH meter 35
Logging Salinity Gauge 150
Logging DO/Temp Probe 150
Logging Water Quality Sonde 1 Sensor 50 200 700
Logging Water Quality Sonde 2 Sensor 65 250 800
Logging Water Quality Sonde 3 Sensor 75 300 900
Logging Water Quality Sonde 4 Sensor 90 350 1,000
Telemetry System Hardware 125
Water Quality Multi-Probe Depth Profiler 200
Niskin Water Sampler 50
ISCO 6712 Portable Sampler w/ISCO 2105 Module 60 350 900 819
ESA 2026 Schedule of Fees
5 ITEM RATE/DAY RATE/WEEK RATE/MONTH
Sedimentation / Geotechnical Equipment:

Peat Corer $ 85
60lb Helly-Smith Bedload Sampler 200
Mini-Ponar Grab Sampler 50
DH-76 Suspended Sediment Sampler 100
D-96 Suspended Sediment Sampler 200
Bridge Crane 150
RSET 50
AMS Soil Sampling Kit 50
Hand-Held Helley -Smith Bedload Sampler 30
Guelph Permeameter 60
Sludge Sampler 60
Shear Strength Vane 60
Handheld DH -48 Suspended Sediment Sampler 30
a
Actual project charges will include the daily rate plus $0.75 per beyond 100 miles 820

EXHIBIT C

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty not less than $10,000 and no more than $100,000 for such failure.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; and

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instruction.

Consultant:

Patrick Hickman, Project Manager
By:________________________________________
821

EXHIBIT D

TRADE RESTRICTION CERTIFICATION
Trade Restriction Certification. By submission of an offer, the Offeror certifies that with respect to this solicitation and any resultant contract, the Offeror:

1. is not owned or controlled by one or more citizens of a foreign country included in the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR);

2. has not knowingly entered into any contract or subcontract for this project with a person that is a citizen or national of a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by the USTR; and

3. has not entered into any subcontract for any product to be used on the Federal project that is produced in a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the USTR.

This certification concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States of America and the making of a false, fictitious, or fraudulent certification may render the maker subject to prosecution under Title 18 USC Section 1001.

The Offeror/Consultant must provide immediate written notice to the Owner if the Offeror/Consultant learns that its certification or that of a Sub-Consultant was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The Consultant must require Sub-Consultant provide immediate written notice to the Consultant if at any time it learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

Unless the restrictions of this clause are waived by the Secretary of Transportation in accordance with 49 CFR 30.17, no contract shall be awarded to an Offeror or Sub-Consultant:
a. who is owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the USTR or,
b. whose Sub-Consultant are owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country on such USTR list or, c. who incorporates in the public works project any product of a foreign country on such USTR list.
822
Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by this provision. The knowledge and information of a Consultant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

The Offeror agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will incorporate this provision for certification without modification in all lower tier subcontracts. The Consultant may rely on the certification of a prospective SubConsultant that it is not a firm from a foreign country included on the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms as published by USTR, unless the Offeror has knowledge that the certification is erroneous.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making an award. If it is later determined that the Consultant or Sub-Consultant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may direct through the Owner cancellation of the contract or subcontract for default at no cost to the Owner or the FAA.

Consultant: Environmental Science Associates
Patrick Hickman, Project Manager
By:________________________________________
823

EXHIBIT E

TAX DELINQUENCY AND FELONY CONVICTION CERTIFICATION
The applicant must complete the following two certification statements. The applicant must indicate its current status as it relates to tax delinquency and felony conviction by inserting a checkmark (9) in the space following the applicable response. The applicant agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will incorporate this provision for certification in all lower tier subcontracts.

Certifications (Check one)
The applicant represents that it is is not a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.

The applicant represents that it is is not is not a corporation that was convicted of a criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

Note:

If an applicant responds in the affirmative to either of the above representations, the applicant is ineligible to receive an award unless the sponsor has received notification from the agency suspension and debarment official (SDO) that the SDO has considered suspension or debarment and determined that further action is not required to protect the Government’s interests. The applicant therefore must provide information to the owner about its tax liability or conviction to the Owner, who will then notify the FAA Airports District Office, which will then notify the agency’s SDO to facilitate completion of the required considerations before award decisions are made.

Term Definitions
Felony conviction: Felony conviction means a conviction within the preceding twenty-four (24) months of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law and includes conviction of an offense defined in a section of the U.S. code that specifically classifies the offense as a felony and conviction of an offense that is classified as a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 3559.

Tax Delinquency: A tax delinquency is any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability.

Consultant: Environmental Science Associates
Patrick Hickman, Project Manager
By:________________________________________
824

EXHIBIT F

CERTIFICATION OF OFFERER / BIDDER REGARDING DEBARMENT
By submitting a bid/proposal under this solicitation, the bidder or offeror certifies that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred or suspended by any Federal department or agency from participation in this transaction.

Consultant: Environmental Science Associates
Patrick Hickman, Project Manager
By:________________________________________
825

EXHIBIT G
COPY OF W9
826
Form W-9
(Rev. March 2024)
Request for Taxpayer
Identification Number and Certification
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service Go to www.irs.gov/FormW9 for instructions and the latest information.

Give form to the
requester. Do not
send to the IRS.

Before you begin. For guidance related to the purpose of Form W-9, see Purpose of Form, below. Print or type. See Specific Instructions on page 3. 1 Name of entity/individual. An entry is required. (For a sole proprietor or disregarded entity, enter the owner’s name on line 1, and enter the business/disregarded entity’s name on line 2.)
2 Business name/disregarded entity name, if different from above. 3a Check the appropriate box for federal tax classification of the entity/individual whose name is entered on line 1. Check only one of the following seven boxes.

Individual/sole proprietor C corporation S corporation Partnership Trust/estate LLC. Enter the tax classification (C = C corporation, S = S corporation, P = Partnership) ....

Note: Check the “LLC” box above and, in the entry space, enter the appropriate code (C, S, or P) for the tax classification of the LLC, unless it is a disregarded entity. A disregarded entity should instead check the appropriate box for the tax classification of its owner.

Other (see instructions)
3b If on line 3a you checked “Partnership” or “Trust/estate,” or checked “LLC” and entered “P” as its tax classification, and you are providing this form to a partnership, trust, or estate in which you have an ownership interest, check this box if you have any foreign partners, owners, or beneficiaries. See instructions ......... 4 Exemptions (codes apply only to
certain entities, not individuals;
see instructions on page 3):

Exempt payee code (if any)
Exemption from Foreign Account Tax
Compliance Act (FATCA) reporting
code (if any)
(Applies to accounts maintained
outside the United States.)
5 Address (number, street, and apt. or suite no.). See instructions. 6 City, state, and ZIP code
Requester’s name and address (optional)
7 List account number(s) here (optional)
Part I Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)
Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. The TIN provided must match the name given on line 1 to avoid backup withholding. For individuals, this is generally your social security number (SSN). However, for a resident alien, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity, see the instructions for Part I, later. For other entities, it is your employer identification number (EIN). If you do not have a number, see How to get a TIN, later.

Note: If the account is in more than one name, see the instructions for line 1. See also What Name and Number To Give the Requester for guidelines on whose number to enter.

Social security number
––
or
Employer identification number
–
Part II Certification
Under penalties of perjury, I certify that:

1. The number shown on this form is my correct taxpayer identification number (or I am waiting for a number to be issued to me); and

2. I am not subject to backup withholding because (a) I am exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that I am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding; and

3. I am a U.S. citizen or other U.S. person (defined below); and

4. The FATCA code(s) entered on this form (if any) indicating that I am exempt from FATCA reporting is correct.

Certification instructions. You must cross out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on your tax return. For real estate transactions, item 2 does not apply. For mortgage interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, contributions to an individual retirement arrangement (IRA), and, generally, payments other than interest and dividends, you are not required to sign the certification, but you must provide your correct TIN. See the instructions for Part II, later.

Sign
Here
Signature of
U.S. person Date
General Instructions
Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted.

Future developments. For the latest information about developments related to Form W-9 and its instructions, such as legislation enacted after they were published, go to www.irs.gov/FormW9.

What’s New
Line 3a has been modified to clarify how a disregarded entity completes this line. An LLC that is a disregarded entity should check the appropriate box for the tax classification of its owner. Otherwise, it should check the “LLC” box and enter its appropriate tax classification.

New line 3b has been added to this form. A flow-through entity is required to complete this line to indicate that it has direct or indirect foreign partners, owners, or beneficiaries when it provides the Form W-9 to another flow-through entity in which it has an ownership interest. This change is intended to provide a flow-through entity with information regarding the status of its indirect foreign partners, owners, or beneficiaries, so that it can satisfy any applicable reporting requirements. For example, a partnership that has any indirect foreign partners may be required to complete Schedules K-2 and K-3. See the Partnership Instructions for Schedules K-2 and K-3 (Form 1065).

Purpose of Form
An individual or entity (Form W-9 requester) who is required to file an information return with the IRS is giving you this form because they Cat. No. 10231X Form W-9 (Rev. 3-2024)

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
X
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
9 4 1 6 9 8 3 5 0
575 MARKET STREET, SUITE 3700
03/05/26
827

EXHIBIT H
COI
828
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBR

LTR INSD WVD
PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: PHONE FAX
(A/C, No, Ext): (A/C, No): E-MAIL ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP TYPE OF INSURANCE (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO- POLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG OTHER: $ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident) $ ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $
$ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A
(Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
$
$
$
$
$
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
4/14/2026
License # 0E67768
(619) 788-5795 50206 (619) 574-6288
13056
Environmental Science Associates
575 Market Street, Suite 3700
San Francisco, CA 94105
16820
A 2,000,000
X X PSB0007416 12/1/2025 12/1/2026 1,000,000
Limited Cont Liab 10,000
Serv Interest 2,000,000
4,000,000
4,000,000
X XCU/BFPD/Cont Liab Ded 0
A 1,000,000
X X PSA0002468 12/1/2025 12/1/2026
Comp Ded $1,000 Coll Ded $1,000
A 10,000,000
PSE0004550 12/1/2025 12/1/2026 10,000,000
0 A
X PSW0004135 12/1/2025 12/1/2026 1,000,000 N 1,000,000
1,000,000
B Professional Liab. CPPLD000281900 12/1/2025 Per Claim 10,000,000 B Ded.: $50k Per Clm CPPLD000281900 12/1/2025 12/1/2026 Aggregate 10,000,000 FIVE YEAR MASTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT (TVL) 2026-2031 D202502149.00 City of South Lake Tahoe, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are Additional Insureds with respect to General and Auto Liability per the attached endorsements as required by written contract. Insurance is Primary and Non-Contributory. Waiver of Subrogation applies to General Liability, Auto Liability and Workers’ Compensation. Stop-Gap coverage is included for the State of Washington. 30 Days Notice of Cancellation with 10 Days Notice for Non-Payment of Premium in accordance with the policy provisions.

City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
ENVISCI-05 MCCOWANA
IOA Insurance Services
3636 Nobel Drive
Suite 410
San Diego, CA 92122
Ali Smith
[email protected]
RLI Insurance Company
SiriusPoint Specialty Insurance Corporation
X
12/1/2026
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
829

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
LAKE TAHOE AIRPORT 2026-2031
Initial Submittal Review Ranking Sheet
Statement of Qualifications March 26, 2026
Company Name Employee 1 Employee 2 Employee 3 SOQ Score Ranking ESA 93 85 100 278 1
Dudek 92 76 100 268 2
Avalex 79 76 61 216 3
Langan 89 53 61 203 4
Soar 85 44 68 197 5
Firm Recommended for Selection: Environmental Service Associates (ESA) 830
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Agenda Item #:5
Agenda Item: Additional Grant Application to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Caltrans for Lake Tahoe Airport Runway Maintenance
Executive Summary: On February 10, 2026, the Airport received authorization to apply for an FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant in the amount of $250,000 for the update of the Lake Tahoe Airport Pavement Maintenance Program. On March 10, 2026, the Airport received additional authorization to apply for an additional FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant in the amount of $50,000. Due to the availability of additional federal funding, the Airport now recommends approval of additional authorization to apply for FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants increasing the total FAA grant amount to $500,000, and to include any additional funding the FAA may make available for this project, which could modify the Caltrans matching share. Staff will submit a matching grant application to Caltrans for the update of the Lake Tahoe Airport Runway Maintenance in the amount of $23,750 (4.75%). The new total amount the airport would be responsible for would be $131,250. NO GENERAL FUNDS WILL BE USED.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing the Airport Manager to apply for additional FY 2025 -2026 Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant in the amount of $200,000.00 for the combined amount of $500,000.00 and FY 2025-2026 Caltrans State Matching Grant for Lake Tahoe Airport in the amount of $23,750 or any additional funding the FAA or Caltrans will provide.

Responsible Staff Member: Milan Jevic, Airport Maintenance Supervisor Reviewed and Approved By: John Dickinson, Airport Manager Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report FAA Grant for Runway.docx
02-Resolution Airport Pavement .docx
831
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Title: Additional Grant Application to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Caltrans for Lake Tahoe Airport Runway Maintenance
Location: Airport, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Responsible Staff Member: Milan Jevic, Airport Maintenance Supervisor Background: The Lake Tahoe Airport (or “TVL” or the “Airport”) is a historically significant and important transportation facility for the City of South Lake Tahoe and the surrounding region. The Airport directly impacts the area’s economic vitality as an essential transportation resource.

The existing pavements throughout the airport are inclusive of Runway 18/36, parallel taxiway and adjoining taxiway connectors, and general aviation aprons. Each of these airfield pavements was initially constructed in the 1950s. Runway 18/36 was last reconstructed in 2008. This project shall consist of asphalt pavement maintenance on Runway 18/36, and the runway blast pads. The proposed maintenance for these asphalt pavement areas includes the routing and filling of cracks greater than ¼” inch in width with crack sealant, application of an asphalt-based surface treatment, and application of pavement markings. The proposed periodic maintenance will mitigate pavement cracking and provide a surface treatment resistant to UV rays, water and oxidation.

Staff would like to extend the existing runway pavement’s useful life, maintain the pavement condition for the safe operation of aircraft, and minimize the potential for foreign object debris (FOD) and other environmental issues. The Runway 18/36 Pavement Preservation project will be designed by Consultant Jviation, a Woolpert company, and will be constructed in accordance with current requirements, regulations, rules, policies, grant assurances, and Advisory Circulars (ACs).

Issue and Discussion: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) allows eligible general aviation airports to receive up to a 95 percent federal share for Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants, with the airport sponsor responsible for the remaining 5 percent match through a combination of state and/or local funds. The California Transportation Commission provides 4.75 percent of FAA grant amounts as state matching funds, with the Airport certifying the remaining 0.25 percent of total project costs from local sources.

On February 10, 2026, the Airport received authorization to apply for an FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant in the amount of $250,000 for the update of the Lake Tahoe Airport 832
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Pavement Maintenance Program. On March 10, 2026, the Airport received additional authorization to apply for an additional FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant in the amount of $50,000. Due to the availability of additional federal funding, the Airport now recommends approval of additional authorization to apply for FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants increasing the total FAA grant amount to $500,000, and to include any additional funding the FAA may make available for this project, which could modify the Caltrans matching share. Staff will submit a matching grant application to Caltrans for the update of the Lake Tahoe Airport Runway Maintenance in the amount of $23,750 (4.75%). The new total amount the airport would be responsible for would be $131,250.

Staff Recommendation:

Pass a Resolution approving and authorizing the Airport Manager to apply for all FAA AIP grants for the pavement maintenance project. Also, allow the Airport Manager to apply for the Caltrans grant for the same project.

Financial Implications: Upon approval of the FAA and Caltrans Matching grants, staff will bring this back to city council for acceptance of award and for authorization of the Finance Director to appropriate the budget in account# 50180052 as follows:
2025-2026 AIP Grants and Caltrans: Lake Tahoe Airport Pavement Maintenance Estimated Project Cost $630,000.00
95% FAA grants - $500,000.00, total in grants

4.75% Caltrans AIP Matching Grant Participation $23,750.00

0.25% City Grant Match and Airport Cash balance of $131,250.00 NO GENERAL

FUNDS WILL BE USED
Environmental Considerations: The project is exempt from review under CEQA Guidelines section 15301(d) (Existing Facilities - restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged facilities to meet current standards of public health and safety).

Policy Implications: This pavement maintenance project will extend the useful life of the airfield pavements until the next rehabilitation and reconstruction project in 5-7 years. 833
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 3
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 19, 2026
Authorization for the Airport Manager to Apply for Additional FY 2025-2026 Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant and Caltrans Grant Program

BACKGROUND
A. The Airport Manager requests to apply for 2025-2026 AIP grants to fund the Runway Maintenance Project with the FAA and to accept when received. This project will be funded 95% from the FAA and 4.75% from Caltrans, which will leave the City’s contributions at 0.25% and the airport’s cash balance for all funds not received from the FAA.

B. On February 10, 2026, City Council approved the airport to apply for FAA and Caltrans funding in the amount of $250,000.00 from FAA and $11,875.00 from Caltrans. On March 10, 2026, City Council approved the airport to apply for additional FAA and Caltrans funding in the amount of $50,000.00.

C. The FAA has approved an additional $200,000.00 to the airport for the Runway Pavement Maintenance Project, which will bring the total not to exceed amount to $500,000.00.

D. Caltrans will also match 4.75%, which will bring an additional amount up to $23,750.00.

E. The FAA may make additional funding available for this project. To streamline the authorization process, staff is requesting City Council approval to apply for any additional funding without returning to City Council for further approval.

F. Upon award of the final amount, the Airport Manager will submit to the City Council a request for authorization to accept each of the awards and appropriate the City’s share for the match and additional funding as necessary.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorizes the Airport Manager to file the application with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the Pavement Maintenance Project for an amount of $500,000.00 and to include any additional funding the FAA may make available for this project, which could modify the Caltrans matching share.

2. Authorizes the Airport Manager to file an application for a State AIP Matching grant for this project in the amount of $23,750.00. Total amount of Caltrans grant match increase will be $9,500.00 and may increase further depending on the FAA’s final funding amount. 834
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 3

3. Authorizes the Airport Manager to sign any documents required to apply for these subject funds on behalf of the City of South Lake Tahoe.

4. Acknowledges that the City’s Match of 0.25% will be appropriated from the Airport's Cash Balance in an amount up to $131,250.00, which may increase further depending on the FAA’s final funding amount, plus any additional funding required for the project, upon the acceptance of all grant awards.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 19, 2026, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
_____________________________ Date:____________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
____________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
835
Resolution 20
26-XXX May19, 2026 Page 3 of 3
836
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Agenda Item #:6
Agenda Item: Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for FY26/27 Executive Summary: Senate Bill 1 stipulates that the City must establish a Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for FY26/27 and adopt that list with a resolution in order to receive the FY 26/27. allocation. This is an action the council must take annually.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving the Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for FY26/27 Responsible Staff Member: Stephen Anderjack, Project Manager Reviewed and Approved By: Mohammad Qureshi, Director of Public Works Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report-RMRA Project List 2027.docx
02-Resolution - SB1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation 2027.docx 03_RMRA Estimate.pdf
837
Council Agenda Report- May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account Project List for FY26/27 Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Stephen Anderjack, Project Manager (530) 542-6033 Background: In April 2017, the State passed Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), increasing the State’s Gas Tax. “This act presents a balance of new revenues and reasonable reforms to ensure efficiency, accountability, and performance from each dollar invested to improve California’s transportation system.”
SB 1 creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program (RMRP). Programs funded by this account include the Local Partnership Program (LPP), the Active Transportation Program (ATP), the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), and Local Streets and Roads apportionments.

SB 1 states that “it is the intent of the Legislature that the Department of Transportation and local governments are held accountable for the efficient investment of public funds to maintain the public highways, streets, and roads, and are accountable to the people through performance goals that are tracked and reported.”
Under SB 1 the City is eligible to receive funds for local streets and road rehabilitation and maintenance from the RMRA. The funds are a census-based apportionment and subject to certain eligibility requirements. According to the latest estimate of the State FY 26/27 RMRA apportionment for Cities (Attachment A), the City is eligible to receive approximately $601,126 in FY 26/27.

These funds help maintain City roadway infrastructure and are available on an annual basis with so long as Council adopts a resolution listing proposed projects and the City submits an annual expenditure report. These funds are very sustainable and should continue to be available in future years
Issue and Discussion: For the City to be eligible for the RMRA funds, the City must submit a list of proposed projects to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) no later than July 1, 2026.. The City also needs to adopt a resolution listing the projects that could be funded by RMRA funds.The streets listed below are included in the resolution and the FY 26/27 annual budget will include the 2027 Road Rehab Project.

1. Palmira Ave
838
Council Agenda Report- May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 3

2. Chris Ave

3. William Ave

4. Elwood Ave

5. Armstrong Ave

6. Knox Ave

7. Bertha Ave

8. Osborne Ave

9. Kubel Ave

10.Alma Ave

11.Rose Ave

12.Pinter Ave

13.Fountain Ave

14.Lodi Ave

15.Stockton Ave

16.Reno Ave

17.Carson Ave

18.Martin Ave

19.Charles Ave

20.Omalley Dr
The proposed construction will typically include grinding 4” of asphalt and replacing it with new asphalt, based on pavement boring testing and sub-base evaluation. The addition of a pavement base may also be included. This rehabilitation technique should provide a 20-year life extension to the roadways. The selected projects, based on overall funding capacity, will commence summer of 2027 and will be completed by fall of 2027.

Each of these streets has low Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ratings. Coordination with the utility providers has also occurred and no utility work is expected in these areas.

The amount of funds received through SB 1 is limited and will be insufficient to cover paving of entire length of these streets. These funds will be added to the overall project budget and will supplement the paving portion of the project. The Department expects that these funds will pave approximately 2,500 lane feet of roadway. The exact street to be paved with these funds will be determined in the future and will be dependent on additional funding allocation for the projects.

Financial Implications: RMRA funds have no match requirement but must be used for road rehabilitation or they will be rescinded back to the State. The City will utilize the estimated $580,235 worth of RMRA funding to pave streets within the multiple proposed project areas.

Environmental Considerations: This project is considered roadway rehabilitation and will not extend the boundaries of the existing roadways. As such, the project is exempt from Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) permits and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15301(c) (Existing Facilities). All applicable best management practices will be utilized to protect air and water quality during construction.

Policy Implications: The use of these funds to supplement paving on these projects is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan 2025-2030. It aligns with goal 5.5 which states “Increase annual road repair through innovative maintenance and rehab program.” 839
Council Agenda Report
- May 19, 2026 Page 3 of 3
840
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19th, 2026 Page 1 of 3
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 19, 2026
Adopting a List of Projects for the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017

BACKGROUND
A. Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide.

B. SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year.

C. The City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement.

D. The City will receive an estimated $601,126 in RMRA funding in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1
E. This is the tenth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1.

F. The City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list.

G. The funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate roads throughout the City this year and next year.

H. The 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in an “at-risk” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a “at-risk” condition.

I. The SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials, and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.
841
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19th, 2026 Page 2 of 3
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Declares the foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. Adopts the following list of newly proposed projects that may be funded in-part with Fiscal Year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Location Description
ComponentPriority Status
Est. Schedule Useful Life
AssemblyDistrictSenateDistrict
Start Finish Min Max
Palmira Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Chris Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
William Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Elwood Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Armstrong Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Knox Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Bertha Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Osborne Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Kubel Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Alma Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Rose Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Pinter Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Fountain Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
842
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19th, 2026 Page 3 of 3
Lodi Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Stockton Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Reno Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Carson Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Martin Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Charles Ave Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Omalley Dr Project will include
rehabilitation of existing
pavement
CON 26/27 5/1/27 10/15/27 20 20 5 1
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 19, 2026 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
843
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide re 2025-26 2026-27Estimated January 2026 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 2,091,323 2,237,775 4,329,098 2,279,092 2,217,185 4,496,277 ALBANY 560,306 606,048 1,166,355 617,118 594,027 1,211,145 BERKELEY 3,396,825 3,629,522 7,026,347 3,696,630 3,601,256 7,297,886 DUBLIN 1,976,753 2,115,856 4,092,609 2,154,909 2,095,719 4,250,628 EMERYVILLE 356,520 387,190 743,710 394,233 377,976 772,210 FREMONT 6,156,435 6,566,152 12,722,587 6,687,780 6,526,946 13,214,726 HAYWARD 4,341,149 4,634,421 8,975,571 4,720,186 4,602,412 9,322,598 LIVERMORE 2,322,713 2,484,008 4,806,721 2,529,896 2,462,500 4,992,397 NEWARK 1,293,804 1,387,598 2,681,402 1,413,159 1,371,669 2,784,828 OAKLAND 11,463,584 12,213,739 23,677,323 12,440,216 12,153,495 24,593,711 PIEDMONT 298,216 325,146 623,362 331,037 316,163 647,201 PLEASANTON 2,112,072 2,259,855 4,371,928 2,301,582 2,239,183 4,540,765 SAN LEANDRO 2,406,371 2,573,033 4,979,404 2,620,574 2,551,193 5,171,767 UNION CITY 1,855,037 1,986,332 3,841,369 2,022,981 1,966,678 3,989,659 County of Alameda 26,097,421 31,524,134 57,621,555 32,111,203 27,668,037 59,779,240 Total Cities & County: Alameda 66,728,530 74,930,810 141,659,340 76,320,595 70,744,441 147,065,036

ALPINE COUNTY
County of Alpine 504,422 629,901 1,134,323 634,030 534,780 1,168,810

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 5,293 11,655 16,948 11,764 5,612 17,375
IONE 239,171 271,369 510,540 276,272 253,565 529,837
JACKSON 133,149 154,088 287,238 156,818 141,162 297,981 PLYMOUTH 29,695 38,648 68,342 39,257 31,482 70,738
SUTTER CREEK 69,975 83,206 153,182 84,641 74,187 158,828 County of Amador 2,572,129 2,504,054 5,076,183 2,548,338 2,726,927 5,275,265 Total Cities & County: Amador 3,049,412 3,063,021 6,112,433 3,117,090 3,232,935 6,350,024

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 52,217 61,853 114,070 62,893 55,359 118,252
CHICO 3,013,045 3,249,179 6,262,225 3,309,203 3,194,379 6,503,582 GRIDLEY 193,888 214,931 408,819 218,793 205,557 424,350 OROVILLE 529,553 577,253 1,106,806 587,803 561,423 1,149,226 PARADISE 293,452 327,866 621,318 333,711 311,113 644,824 County of Butte 8,469,874 8,062,403 16,532,277 8,205,436 8,979,615 17,185,050 Total Cities & County: Butte 12,552,030 12,493,484 25,045,514 12,717,839 13,307,446 26,025,285 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
844

Page 1 of 21 ends

South Lake Tahoe City CouncilMay 19, 2026

South Lake Tahoe City Council
May 19, 2026