Agenda packet — South Lake Tahoe City Council, May 19, 2026 (part 4 of 4)

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 96,653 120,937 217,590 123,065 102,470 225,535 County of Calaveras 3,897,391 3,750,643 7,648,034 3,817,712 4,131,947 7,949,659 Total City & County: Calaveras 3,994,044 3,871,580 7,865,624 3,940,777 4,234,416 8,175,193

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 172,980 184,389 357,370 187,692 183,391 371,082
WILLIAMS 147,917 158,659 306,576 161,482 156,819 318,301 County of Colusa 2,998,917 2,494,606 5,493,523 2,531,875 3,179,400 5,711,275 Total Cities & County: Colusa 3,319,814 2,837,654 6,157,468 2,881,049 3,519,610 6,400,659

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 3,090,696 3,332,036 6,422,732 3,393,598 3,276,703 6,670,301 BRENTWOOD 1,740,043 1,879,884 3,619,927 1,914,543 1,844,764 3,759,307 CLAYTON 292,817 322,080 614,897 327,912 310,440 638,352 CONCORD 3,321,980 3,580,273 6,902,253 3,646,442 3,521,906 7,168,348 DANVILLE 1,155,680 1,251,188 2,406,868 1,274,207 1,225,232 2,499,439 EL CERRITO 687,554 748,750 1,436,303 762,445 728,932 1,491,377 HERCULES 694,064 755,737 1,449,801 769,562 735,835 1,505,397 LAFAYETTE 672,892 733,013 1,405,904 746,416 713,388 1,459,804 MARTINEZ 993,498 1,077,118 2,070,616 1,096,907 1,053,289 2,150,196 MORAGA 457,937 500,302 958,239 509,424 485,497 994,920
OAKLEY 1,239,285 1,340,921 2,580,206 1,365,606 1,313,869 2,679,475 ORINDA 516,638 563,306 1,079,944 573,597 547,730 1,121,327 PINOLE 501,129 546,660 1,047,789 556,642 531,288 1,087,930 PITTSBURG 2,021,295 2,181,751 4,203,045 2,222,012 2,142,942 4,364,954 PLEASANT HILL 913,386 991,135 1,904,520 1,009,328 968,356 1,977,684 RICHMOND 3,067,380 3,307,011 6,374,391 3,368,109 3,251,983 6,620,092 SAN PABLO 852,329 925,603 1,777,932 942,580 903,625 1,846,205 SAN RAMON 2,238,975 2,415,387 4,654,362 2,459,984 2,373,723 4,833,707 WALNUT CREEK 1,860,701 2,009,385 3,870,086 2,046,448 1,972,683 4,019,130 County of Contra Costa 22,047,339 26,814,607 48,861,946 27,342,374 23,374,210 50,716,583 Total Cities & County: Contra Costa 48,365,615 55,276,147 103,641,762 56,328,135 51,276,394 107,604,529 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
845

Page 2 of 21 ends

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 178,167 192,674 370,842 196,128 188,890 385,018 County of Del Norte 1,534,419 1,368,358 2,902,777 1,393,749 1,626,765 3,020,514 Total City & County: Del Norte 1,712,586 1,561,032 3,273,619 1,589,878 1,815,655 3,405,533

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 286,359 341,501 627,860 347,665 303,593 651,258 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 567,002 2,199,738 2,766,740 2,211,943 601,126 2,813,069 County of El Dorado 8,221,799 9,859,201 18,081,000 10,014,141 8,716,610 18,730,751 Total Cities & County: El Dorado 9,075,160 12,400,440 21,475,600 12,573,750 9,621,329 22,195,079

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 3,417,283 3,609,046 7,026,329 3,675,809 3,622,945 7,298,754 COALINGA 477,389 510,910 988,300 520,237 506,120 1,026,357 FIREBAUGH 230,622 249,365 479,988 253,871 244,502 498,373 FOWLER 202,913 220,221 423,133 224,185 215,125 439,310
FRESNO 14,742,266 15,530,488 30,272,754 15,818,506 15,629,497 31,448,003 HURON 183,461 199,761 383,221 203,345 194,502 397,847
KERMAN 464,077 496,909 960,986 505,975 492,006 997,982
KINGSBURG 351,597 377,605 729,202 384,474 372,758 757,231 MENDOTA 336,380 361,599 697,978 368,171 356,624 724,795 ORANGE COVE 257,168 277,285 534,453 282,309 272,645 554,954 PARLIER 387,697 415,573 803,270 423,148 411,029 834,177 REEDLEY 704,068 751,328 1,455,396 765,083 746,441 1,511,524SANGER 715,554 763,409 1,478,963 777,389 758,618 1,536,007SAN JOAQUIN 97,870 108,738 206,609 110,651 103,760 214,411 SELMA 654,048 697,718 1,351,765 710,496 693,410 1,403,906 County of Fresno 28,857,904 28,822,021 57,679,925 29,346,149 30,594,654 59,940,803 Total Cities & County: Fresno 52,080,297 53,391,976 105,472,273 54,369,797 55,214,636 109,584,433

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 230,358 247,372 477,730 251,842 244,221 496,063
WILLOWS 171,366 185,764 357,130 189,089 181,679 370,768 County of Glenn 3,666,727 3,053,068 6,719,795 3,095,140 3,887,401 6,982,540 Total Cities & County: Glenn 4,068,451 3,486,204 7,554,654 3,536,071 4,313,301 7,849,372 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
846

Page 3 of 21 ends

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 502,876 553,877 1,056,753 563,988 533,140 1,097,128 BLUE LAKE 31,891 40,368 72,259 41,009 33,811 74,819
EUREKA 713,834 784,539 1,498,373 798,892 756,795 1,555,687 FERNDALE 36,893 45,789 82,683 46,531 39,114 85,645
FORTUNA 331,616 367,245 698,861 373,913 351,573 725,486 RIO DELL 89,719 103,048 192,767 104,852 95,118 199,970
TRINIDAD 8,125 14,607 22,732 14,770 8,614 23,384
County of Humboldt 6,879,228 6,252,900 13,132,128 6,366,211 7,293,239 13,659,450 Total Cities & County: Humboldt 8,594,182 8,162,373 16,756,555 8,310,167 9,111,404 17,421,570

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 766,236 832,316 1,598,552 847,563 812,350 1,659,913 CALEXICO 1,060,562 1,147,876 2,208,437 1,168,979 1,124,389 2,293,368 CALIPATRIA 172,927 192,203 365,130 195,644 183,334 378,978 EL CENTRO 1,217,609 1,316,254 2,533,863 1,340,482 1,290,889 2,631,370 HOLTVILLE 150,458 168,112 318,570 171,106 159,513 330,619 IMPERIAL 605,166 658,625 1,263,791 670,667 641,586 1,312,253 WESTMORLAND 55,155 64,934 120,088 66,031 58,474 124,505 County of Imperial 12,998,832 10,693,113 23,691,945 10,894,915 13,781,139 24,676,053 Total Cities & County: Imperial 17,026,945 15,073,433 32,100,377 15,355,386 18,051,674 33,407,061

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 102,025 116,384 218,410 118,436 108,166 226,601
County of Inyo 4,295,530 3,620,688 7,916,218 3,672,365 4,554,047 8,226,412 Total City & County: Inyo 4,397,555 3,737,072 8,134,628 3,790,800 4,662,213 8,453,013 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
847

Page 4 of 21 ends

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 529,077 553,208 1,082,284 563,330 560,918 1,124,248 BAKERSFIELD 11,095,445 11,431,754 22,527,199 11,644,035 11,763,201 23,407,236 CALIFORNIA CITY 397,463 417,780 815,242 425,384 421,383 846,767 DELANO 1,398,212 1,451,027 2,849,239 1,477,778 1,482,360 2,960,138 MARICOPA 27,154 33,741 60,895 34,260 28,788 63,048
MCFARLAND 376,158 394,857 771,015 402,054 398,796 800,850 RIDGECREST 751,257 783,825 1,535,082 798,199 796,469 1,594,668 SHAFTER 620,754 648,541 1,269,295 660,418 658,113 1,318,531TAFT 226,838 240,211 467,049 244,551 240,490 485,040 TEHACHAPI 345,140 362,941 708,081 369,544 365,911 735,455 WASCO 717,566 749,158 1,466,724 762,887 760,751 1,523,638 County of Kern 26,463,640 27,010,038 53,473,678 27,454,060 28,056,296 55,510,356 Total Cities & County: Kern 42,948,702 44,077,081 87,025,783 44,836,500 45,533,475 90,369,975

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 362,422 382,948 745,370 389,922 384,233 774,155
CORCORAN 572,348 602,246 1,174,594 613,259 606,794 1,220,052 HANFORD 1,620,709 1,689,920 3,310,629 1,721,104 1,718,248 3,439,352 LEMOORE 732,889 769,424 1,502,314 783,526 776,997 1,560,523 County of Kings 5,580,838 5,051,254 10,632,092 5,149,914 5,916,709 11,066,623 Total Cities & County: Kings 8,869,207 8,495,792 17,364,999 8,657,724 9,402,981 18,060,705

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 446,477 481,064 927,541 489,834 473,347 963,181 LAKEPORT 133,017 147,499 280,516 150,112 141,022 291,134 County of Lake 3,818,617 3,662,500 7,481,117 3,730,899 4,048,433 7,779,331 Total Cities & County: Lake 4,398,111 4,291,063 8,689,174 4,370,845 4,662,802 9,033,647

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 429,618 487,784 917,402 496,046 455,474 951,520 County of Lassen 3,684,819 3,231,296 6,916,115 3,276,941 3,906,582 7,183,523 Total City & County: Lassen 4,114,437 3,719,080 7,833,517 3,772,987 4,362,056 8,135,043 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
848

Page 5 of 21 ends

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 535,455 580,446 1,115,900 591,039 567,680 1,158,719 ALHAMBRA 2,186,626 2,342,634 4,529,260 2,385,894 2,318,224 4,704,118 ARCADIA 1,505,292 1,616,521 3,121,814 1,646,302 1,595,885 3,242,187 ARTESIA 433,959 471,279 905,238 479,865 460,076 939,940 AVALON 91,122 102,910 194,032 104,713 96,606 201,318
AZUSA 1,329,877 1,429,578 2,759,455 1,455,889 1,409,913 2,865,801 BALDWIN PARK 1,906,486 2,044,083 3,950,569 2,081,801 2,021,224 4,103,025 BELL 903,382 973,553 1,876,935 991,425 957,750 1,949,175 BELLFLOWER 2,086,983 2,236,441 4,323,424 2,277,730 2,212,583 4,490,314 BELL GARDENS 1,045,159 1,124,648 2,169,806 1,145,325 1,108,059 2,253,384 BEVERLY HILLS 865,403 933,079 1,798,482 950,200 917,486 1,867,686 BRADBURY 24,348 31,749 56,097 32,230 25,814 58,044
BURBANK 2,836,360 3,037,569 5,873,929 3,093,684 3,007,060 6,100,744 CALABASAS 614,667 664,863 1,279,530 677,024 651,659 1,328,683 CARSON 2,482,884 2,658,361 5,141,245 2,707,483 2,632,311 5,339,794 CERRITOS 1,306,376 1,403,032 2,709,407 1,428,877 1,384,997 2,813,874 CLAREMONT 1,014,538 1,092,014 2,106,552 1,112,086 1,075,596 2,187,682 COMMERCE 327,514 356,838 684,352 363,318 347,224 710,542 COMPTON 2,543,120 2,722,556 5,265,676 2,772,870 2,696,172 5,469,041 COVINA 1,357,693 1,459,222 2,816,914 1,486,082 1,439,402 2,925,485 CUDAHY 602,704 652,115 1,254,819 664,039 638,977 1,303,016 CULVER CITY 1,070,142 1,151,273 2,221,416 1,172,445 1,134,547 2,306,992 DIAMOND BAR 1,454,425 1,562,311 3,016,736 1,591,086 1,541,956 3,133,042 DOWNEY 3,014,925 3,227,869 6,242,793 3,287,516 3,196,371 6,483,887 DUARTE 628,456 679,558 1,308,014 691,992 666,278 1,358,270 EL MONTE 2,888,683 3,093,330 5,982,013 3,150,480 3,062,532 6,213,012 EL SEGUNDO 458,201 497,115 955,316 506,180 485,777 991,957 GARDENA 1,611,896 1,730,132 3,342,028 1,762,022 1,708,905 3,470,926 GLENDALE 5,184,586 5,540,123 10,724,709 5,642,695 5,496,609 11,139,304 GLENDORA 1,389,557 1,493,181 2,882,738 1,520,672 1,473,185 2,993,857 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 369,091 401,148 770,240 408,450 391,304 799,755 HAWTHORNE 2,328,747 2,494,095 4,822,842 2,540,167 2,468,898 5,009,065 HERMOSA BEACH 521,640 564,723 1,086,362 575,043 553,034 1,128,076 HIDDEN HILLS 46,209 55,046 101,255 55,960 48,990 104,950 HUNTINGTON PARK 1,448,047 1,555,514 3,003,561 1,584,162 1,535,194 3,119,356 INDUSTRY 11,407 17,956 29,363 18,182 12,093 30,275
January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
849

Page 6 of 21 ends

Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide re 2025-26 2026-27Estimated January 2026 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct
INGLEWOOD 2,871,824 3,075,364 5,947,188 3,132,180 3,044,659 6,176,839 IRWINDALE 39,937 48,361 88,298 49,152 42,340 91,492
LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 543,633 589,161 1,132,794 599,916 576,350 1,176,266 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 149,637 166,272 315,909 169,232 158,643 327,875 LAKEWOOD 2,177,945 2,333,382 4,511,328 2,376,471 2,309,020 4,685,491 LA MIRADA 1,304,999 1,401,565 2,706,565 1,427,384 1,383,538 2,810,921 LANCASTER 4,704,762 5,028,764 9,733,526 5,121,844 4,987,908 10,109,752 LA PUENTE 1,005,910 1,082,819 2,088,729 1,102,720 1,066,448 2,169,169 LA VERNE 858,284 925,491 1,783,775 942,472 909,938 1,852,410 LAWNDALE 841,028 907,102 1,748,130 923,741 891,644 1,815,385 LOMITA 553,954 600,161 1,154,115 611,120 587,293 1,198,413 LONG BEACH 12,287,621 13,109,977 25,397,598 13,353,076 13,027,125 26,380,201 LOS ANGELES 103,177,654 109,983,397 213,161,050 112,024,676 109,387,175 221,411,851LYNWOOD 1,814,280 1,945,816 3,760,096 1,981,710 1,923,468 3,905,178 MALIBU 284,136 310,610 594,746 316,231 301,236 617,468
MANHATTAN BEACH 938,528 1,011,009 1,949,537 1,029,577 995,011 2,024,589 MAYWOOD 665,031 719,538 1,384,569 732,695 705,055 1,437,749 MONROVIA 1,030,047 1,108,542 2,138,589 1,128,921 1,092,038 2,220,959 MONTEBELLO 1,660,249 1,781,662 3,441,911 1,814,509 1,760,167 3,574,676 MONTEREY PARK 1,616,713 1,735,265 3,351,978 1,767,250 1,714,011 3,481,261 NORWALK 2,736,928 2,931,602 5,668,531 2,985,750 2,901,644 5,887,394 PALMDALE 4,480,148 4,789,387 9,269,535 4,878,023 4,749,775 9,627,799 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 353,371 384,394 737,765 391,386 374,637 766,023 PARAMOUNT 1,415,044 1,520,342 2,935,386 1,548,337 1,500,205 3,048,543 PASADENA 3,721,904 3,981,311 7,703,215 4,054,946 3,945,899 8,000,845 PICO RIVERA 1,644,370 1,764,739 3,409,109 1,797,272 1,743,332 3,540,604 POMONA 4,050,370 4,331,365 8,381,735 4,411,498 4,294,133 8,705,631 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 1,117,093 1,201,309 2,318,402 1,223,410 1,184,322 2,407,732 REDONDO BEACH 1,858,451 1,992,890 3,851,341 2,029,658 1,970,298 3,999,956 ROLLING HILLS (2)ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 226,150 247,813 473,962 252,287 239,760 492,047 ROSEMEAD 1,352,108 1,453,270 2,805,379 1,480,021 1,433,482 2,913,503 SAN DIMAS 921,061 992,394 1,913,455 1,010,616 976,493 1,987,109 SAN FERNANDO 627,026 678,035 1,305,062 690,440 664,763 1,355,203 SAN GABRIEL 1,044,127 1,123,548 2,167,674 1,144,205 1,106,965 2,251,170 SAN MARINO 332,092 361,718 693,810 368,288 352,078 720,366 SANTA CLARITA 6,150,030 6,569,016 12,719,047 6,690,689 6,520,156 13,210,846 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
850

Page 7 of 21 ends

Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide re 2025-26 2026-27Estimated January 2026 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct
SANTA FE SPRINGS 496,709 538,153 1,034,862 547,980 526,602 1,074,583 SANTA MONICA 2,468,592 2,643,131 5,111,723 2,691,970 2,617,159 5,309,129 SIERRA MADRE 295,781 323,020 618,801 328,872 313,582 642,454 SIGNAL HILL 311,211 339,464 650,674 345,621 329,940 675,561 SOUTH EL MONTE 517,035 559,815 1,076,850 570,044 548,151 1,118,195 SOUTH GATE 2,460,123 2,634,105 5,094,228 2,682,776 2,608,180 5,290,957 SOUTH PASADENA 713,411 771,097 1,484,507 785,211 756,346 1,541,557 TEMPLE CITY 967,111 1,041,471 2,008,582 1,060,604 1,025,315 2,085,919 TORRANCE 3,885,700 4,155,873 8,041,573 4,232,748 4,119,553 8,352,301 VERNON 5,584 11,751 17,336 11,862 5,920 17,782
WALNUT 752,421 812,671 1,565,092 827,557 797,704 1,625,261 WEST COVINA 2,899,984 3,105,374 6,005,358 3,162,747 3,074,513 6,237,260 WEST HOLLYWOOD 944,483 1,017,355 1,961,838 1,036,041 1,001,325 2,037,366 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 215,563 236,531 452,094 240,795 228,537 469,332 WHITTIER 2,325,016 2,490,118 4,815,134 2,536,116 2,464,942 5,001,058 County of Los Angeles 157,417,218 189,206,694 346,623,912 192,756,084 166,891,029 359,647,114 Total Cities & County: Los Angeles 395,658,347 444,070,879 839,729,226 452,333,661 419,470,181 871,803,842 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
851

Page 8 of 21 ends

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 509,995 529,541 1,039,536 539,227 540,688 1,079,915 MADERA 1,758,463 1,807,817 3,566,280 1,841,214 1,864,293 3,705,507 County of Madera 8,171,541 7,272,838 15,444,379 7,404,980 8,663,327 16,068,307 Total Cities & County: Madera 10,439,999 9,610,196 20,050,196 9,785,421 11,068,308 20,853,729

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 56,213 66,673 122,886 67,802 59,596 127,399
CORTE MADERA 270,242 300,444 570,685 305,872 286,506 592,378 FAIRFAX 201,007 224,470 425,477 228,508 213,105 441,612 LARKSPUR 346,172 382,668 728,840 389,622 367,006 756,628 MILL VALLEY 373,987 412,789 786,777 420,302 396,495 816,797 NOVATO 1,407,078 1,536,018 2,943,096 1,564,285 1,491,760 3,056,045 ROSS 61,824 72,749 134,573 73,991 65,545 139,536
SAN ANSELMO 338,365 374,214 712,578 381,011 358,728 739,739 SAN RAFAEL 1,630,210 1,777,648 3,407,858 1,810,397 1,728,321 3,538,718 SAUSALITO 188,410 210,828 399,238 214,613 199,749 414,362 TIBURON 241,712 268,548 510,260 273,404 256,259 529,663 County of Marin 5,959,122 6,624,885 12,584,007 6,749,204 6,317,758 13,066,962 Total Cities & County: Marin 11,074,341 12,251,934 23,326,276 12,479,012 11,740,826 24,219,838

MARIPOSA COUNTY
County of Mariposa 2,445,658 2,114,959 4,560,617 2,146,100 2,592,845 4,738,945

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 190,209 212,525 402,734 216,341 201,657 417,998 POINT ARENA 12,174 18,967 31,142 19,212 12,907 32,118
UKIAH 439,384 484,025 923,409 492,841 465,828 958,669
WILLITS 130,926 147,406 278,332 150,033 138,806 288,838 County of Mendocino 5,624,290 5,091,826 10,716,116 5,186,315 5,962,776 11,149,090 Total Cities & County: Mendocino 6,396,984 5,954,749 12,351,733 6,064,742 6,781,972 12,846,714

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 843,252 884,072 1,727,324 900,305 894,001 1,794,305 DOS PALOS 153,369 165,629 318,998 168,581 162,599 331,181 GUSTINE 160,885 173,413 334,298 176,510 170,568 347,078 LIVINGSTON 382,192 403,598 785,790 410,955 405,193 816,149 LOS BANOS 1,294,069 1,350,939 2,645,008 1,375,850 1,371,950 2,747,800 MERCED 2,594,675 2,699,348 5,294,023 2,749,295 2,750,830 5,500,125 County of Merced 10,912,295 10,056,550 20,968,845 10,241,406 11,569,027 21,810,433 Total Cities & County: Merced 16,340,737 15,733,550 32,074,287 16,022,903 17,324,168 33,347,070 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
852

Page 9 of 21 ends

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 71,987 83,846 155,832 85,266 76,319 161,585
County of Modoc 3,610,791 3,051,415 6,662,206 3,093,482 3,828,099 6,921,581 Total City & County: Modoc 3,682,778 3,135,261 6,818,038 3,178,748 3,904,418 7,083,166

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 191,083 2,229,924 2,421,007 2,234,320 202,583 2,436,902 County of Mono 2,647,851 2,361,773 5,009,624 2,392,636 2,807,206 5,199,843 Total City & County: Mono 2,838,934 4,591,697 7,430,631 4,626,956 3,009,789 7,636,745

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 83,843 92,576 176,420 94,189 88,889 183,079 DEL REY OAKS 41,789 49,051 90,841 49,855 44,304 94,159
GONZALES 226,229 240,942 467,171 245,294 239,844 485,139 GREENFIELD 550,090 579,131 1,129,222 589,714 583,196 1,172,911 KING CITY 379,625 400,703 780,328 408,006 402,472 810,478 MARINA 610,988 642,159 1,253,147 653,914 647,759 1,301,673 MONTEREY 753,586 790,744 1,544,330 805,242 798,938 1,604,181 PACIFIC GROVE 396,404 418,069 814,473 425,695 420,261 845,956 SALINAS 4,281,522 4,446,080 8,727,602 4,528,451 4,539,196 9,067,647 SAND CITY 9,872 16,017 25,889 16,207 10,466 26,673
SEASIDE 866,250 907,350 1,773,600 924,015 918,384 1,842,399 SOLEDAD 729,131 765,435 1,494,566 779,462 773,012 1,552,474 County of Monterey 12,118,379 12,853,089 24,971,468 13,085,946 12,847,698 25,933,644 Total Cities & County: Monterey 21,047,709 22,201,346 43,249,055 22,605,992 22,314,420 44,920,412

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 592,727 626,953 1,219,680 638,422 628,399 1,266,821 CALISTOGA 138,601 151,113 289,714 153,795 146,943 300,737 NAPA 2,062,211 2,159,494 4,221,705 2,199,397 2,186,320 4,385,717 SAINT HELENA 142,809 155,494 298,303 158,258 151,404 309,661 YOUNTVILLE 79,000 88,056 167,056 89,584 83,755 173,339
County of Napa 4,157,207 4,463,841 8,621,048 4,548,754 4,407,399 8,956,153 Total Cities & County: Napa 7,172,555 7,644,952 14,817,507 7,788,209 7,604,220 15,392,429

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 360,199 456,441 816,640 464,716 381,877 846,593 NEVADA CITY 88,607 121,764 210,371 123,799 93,940 217,739 TRUCKEE 448,012 2,500,616 2,948,628 2,510,908 474,975 2,985,883 County of Nevada 4,381,512 4,693,914 9,075,426 4,772,335 4,645,203 9,417,539 Total Cities & County: Nevada 5,278,330 7,772,734 13,051,064 7,871,759 5,595,995 13,467,754 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
853

Page 10 of 21 ends

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 1,370,767 1,498,516 2,869,283 1,526,086 1,453,263 2,979,349 ANAHEIM 9,166,648 9,953,487 19,120,136 10,137,850 9,718,323 19,856,173 BREA 1,267,709 1,385,279 2,652,988 1,410,775 1,344,003 2,754,779 BUENA PARK 2,228,707 2,428,714 4,657,421 2,473,539 2,362,837 4,836,375 COSTA MESA 2,977,370 3,242,931 6,220,301 3,302,813 3,156,556 6,459,370 CYPRESS 1,332,683 1,457,224 2,789,907 1,484,028 1,412,887 2,896,915 DANA POINT 877,048 961,716 1,838,764 979,355 929,832 1,909,187 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1,511,882 1,651,517 3,163,399 1,681,924 1,602,871 3,284,796 FULLERTON 3,807,785 4,143,287 7,951,072 4,219,870 4,036,949 8,256,819 GARDEN GROVE 4,550,705 4,948,777 9,499,483 5,040,303 4,824,579 9,864,882 HUNTINGTON BEACH 5,248,819 5,705,688 10,954,506 5,811,254 5,564,707 11,375,961 IRVINE 8,432,753 9,157,782 17,590,535 9,327,384 8,940,260 18,267,644 LAGUNA BEACH 608,395 669,435 1,277,830 681,671 645,009 1,326,681 LAGUNA HILLS 830,204 910,926 1,741,130 927,623 880,168 1,807,791 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1,727,075 1,884,834 3,611,909 1,919,569 1,831,015 3,750,585 LAGUNA WOODS 469,608 517,960 987,568 527,405 497,870 1,025,275 LA HABRA 1,660,381 1,812,523 3,472,904 1,845,917 1,760,308 3,606,225 LAKE FOREST 2,319,431 2,527,080 4,846,511 2,573,729 2,459,021 5,032,750 LA PALMA 412,151 455,663 867,814 463,953 436,955 900,908 LOS ALAMITOS 317,748 352,309 670,057 358,700 336,871 695,571 MISSION VIEJO 2,477,194 2,698,129 5,175,323 2,747,951 2,626,278 5,374,230 NEWPORT BEACH 2,252,129 2,454,109 4,706,238 2,499,405 2,387,668 4,887,073 ORANGE 3,723,545 4,051,951 7,775,496 4,126,841 3,947,638 8,074,479 PLACENTIA 1,428,674 1,561,300 2,989,974 1,590,034 1,514,655 3,104,690 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 1,268,106 1,385,709 2,653,815 1,411,214 1,344,424 2,755,638 SAN CLEMENTE 1,696,534 1,851,720 3,548,254 1,885,841 1,798,636 3,684,477 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 935,008 1,024,557 1,959,565 1,043,362 991,280 2,034,642 SANTA ANA 8,345,311 9,062,974 17,408,285 9,230,818 8,847,555 18,078,373 SEAL BEACH 669,530 736,720 1,406,250 750,186 709,825 1,460,010 STANTON 1,073,239 1,174,430 2,247,669 1,196,015 1,137,829 2,333,845 TUSTIN 2,126,311 2,317,694 4,444,005 2,360,459 2,254,278 4,614,737 VILLA PARK 155,063 174,923 329,985 178,041 164,395 342,436 WESTMINSTER 2,406,636 2,621,629 5,028,265 2,670,032 2,551,474 5,221,506 YORBA LINDA 1,800,914 1,964,892 3,765,807 2,001,113 1,909,299 3,910,411 County of Orange 56,834,095 70,421,524 127,255,619 71,752,945 60,254,531 132,007,476 Total Cities & County: Orange 138,310,157 159,167,911 297,478,067 162,138,006 146,634,052 308,772,058 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
854

Page 11 of 21 ends

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 364,354 401,570 765,924 408,876 386,282 795,158
COLFAX 52,905 64,316 117,221 65,377 56,089 121,466
LINCOLN 1,442,912 1,571,707 3,014,619 1,600,638 1,529,751 3,130,389 LOOMIS 180,152 201,497 381,649 205,109 190,994 396,104
ROCKLIN 1,936,551 2,105,201 4,041,752 2,144,029 2,053,098 4,197,128 ROSEVILLE 4,194,662 4,548,121 8,742,783 4,632,226 4,447,108 9,079,334 County of Placer 12,455,628 15,342,259 27,797,887 15,596,311 13,205,242 28,801,553 Total Cities & County: Placer 20,627,164 24,234,671 44,861,835 24,652,566 21,868,565 46,521,131

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 55,869 214,005 269,874 215,058 59,232 274,289
County of Plumas 2,957,686 2,943,845 5,901,531 2,981,212 3,135,688 6,116,900 Total City & County: Plumas 3,013,555 3,157,850 6,171,405 3,196,270 3,194,920 6,391,190

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 845,554 925,206 1,770,760 942,170 896,442 1,838,612 BEAUMONT 1,580,217 1,721,190 3,301,407 1,752,894 1,675,318 3,428,212 BLYTHE 496,974 546,241 1,043,215 556,212 526,883 1,083,095 CALIMESA 290,964 322,457 613,421 328,295 308,475 636,770 CANYON LAKE 292,711 324,346 617,057 330,219 310,327 640,546 CATHEDRAL CITY 1,366,982 1,490,592 2,857,575 1,518,018 1,449,251 2,967,269 COACHELLA 1,174,656 1,281,105 2,455,761 1,304,672 1,245,350 2,550,022 CORONA 4,212,208 4,569,999 8,782,208 4,654,508 4,465,711 9,120,219 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 880,304 962,785 1,843,088 980,446 933,283 1,913,729 EASTVALE 1,847,282 2,010,003 3,857,285 2,047,064 1,958,457 4,005,521 HEMET 2,433,102 2,643,524 5,076,625 2,692,339 2,579,533 5,271,871 INDIAN WELLS 128,676 144,954 273,631 147,536 136,421 283,956 INDIO 2,449,113 2,660,839 5,109,953 2,709,975 2,596,508 5,306,483 JURUPA VALLEY 2,803,463 3,046,543 5,850,006 3,102,788 2,972,184 6,074,972 LAKE ELSINORE 1,952,722 2,124,028 4,076,750 2,163,205 2,070,242 4,233,447 LA QUINTA 1,026,765 1,121,172 2,147,937 1,141,772 1,088,559 2,230,331 MENIFEE 3,051,924 3,315,235 6,367,159 3,376,465 3,235,597 6,612,062 MORENO VALLEY 5,579,587 6,048,721 11,628,309 6,160,663 5,915,383 12,076,046 MURRIETA 2,958,579 3,214,290 6,172,869 3,273,647 3,136,635 6,410,282 NORCO 704,730 772,914 1,477,644 787,053 747,142 1,534,196 PALM DESERT 1,375,689 1,500,009 2,875,698 1,527,609 1,458,482 2,986,091 PALM SPRINGS 1,177,090 1,283,738 2,460,829 1,307,354 1,247,931 2,555,285 PERRIS 2,150,077 2,337,453 4,487,530 2,380,590 2,279,475 4,660,064 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
855

Page 12 of 21 ends

Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide re 2025-26 2026-27Estimated January 2026 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct
RANCHO MIRAGE 453,094 498,788 951,881 507,878 480,362 988,240 RIVERSIDE 8,477,957 9,183,098 17,661,055 9,353,190 8,988,184 18,341,374 SAN JACINTO 1,455,351 1,586,157 3,041,509 1,615,356 1,542,938 3,158,294 TEMECULA 2,969,986 3,226,625 6,196,611 3,286,211 3,148,728 6,434,939 WILDOMAR 981,270 1,071,973 2,053,243 1,091,660 1,040,326 2,131,986 County of Riverside 50,121,491 58,032,085 108,153,576 59,137,787 53,137,944 112,275,731 Total Cities & County: Riverside 105,238,519 117,966,073 223,204,592 120,177,575 111,572,070 231,749,645

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 2,321,601 2,537,549 4,859,151 2,584,386 2,461,322 5,045,708 ELK GROVE 4,839,049 5,278,325 10,117,374 5,375,950 5,130,277 10,506,227 FOLSOM 2,450,119 2,677,340 5,127,460 2,726,770 2,597,574 5,324,344 GALT 690,544 761,918 1,452,462 775,849 732,103 1,507,952 ISLETON 21,040 28,686 49,726 29,110 22,307 51,417
RANCHO CORDOVA 2,261,524 2,472,202 4,733,727 2,517,827 2,397,629 4,915,456 SACRAMENTO 13,973,357 15,223,882 29,197,239 15,505,786 14,814,313 30,320,098 County of Sacramento 34,619,382 39,587,332 74,206,714 40,322,278 36,702,874 77,025,152 Total Cities & County: Sacramento 61,176,618 68,567,234 129,743,852 69,837,956 64,858,399 134,696,355

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 1,151,048 1,253,339 2,404,387 1,276,393 1,220,321 2,496,714 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 55,155 65,339 120,493 66,443 58,474 124,917 County of San Benito 2,964,948 2,813,408 5,778,356 2,865,120 3,143,387 6,008,507 Total Cities & County: San Benito 4,171,151 4,132,086 8,303,236 4,207,956 4,422,183 8,630,138 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
856

Page 13 of 21 ends

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 983,202 1,069,136 2,052,339 1,088,775 1,042,374 2,131,149 APPLE VALLEY 2,009,200 2,175,038 4,184,238 2,215,169 2,130,119 4,345,288 BARSTOW 675,776 738,217 1,413,994 751,715 716,446 1,468,162 BIG BEAR LAKE 133,414 736,398 869,812 739,063 141,443 880,506 CHINO 2,519,698 2,724,546 5,244,244 2,774,874 2,671,340 5,446,215 CHINO HILLS 2,074,332 2,245,147 4,319,479 2,286,580 2,199,171 4,485,751 COLTON 1,422,719 1,543,739 2,966,458 1,572,157 1,508,342 3,080,499 FONTANA 5,800,550 6,258,613 12,059,163 6,374,472 6,149,643 12,524,116 GRAND TERRACE 347,389 381,736 729,125 388,675 368,296 756,971 HESPERIA 2,694,001 2,914,670 5,608,671 2,968,479 2,856,134 5,824,613 HIGHLAND 1,510,876 1,638,634 3,149,510 1,668,812 1,601,805 3,270,617 LOMA LINDA 670,166 732,178 1,402,343 745,564 710,498 1,456,062 MONTCLAIR 1,006,148 1,093,835 2,099,984 1,113,932 1,066,701 2,180,633 NEEDLES 130,317 146,076 276,393 148,679 138,160 286,839 ONTARIO 4,880,389 5,268,136 10,148,525 5,365,616 5,174,105 10,539,720 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4,657,759 5,028,493 9,686,252 5,121,527 4,938,076 10,059,603 REDLANDS 1,944,915 2,105,840 4,050,754 2,144,687 2,061,965 4,206,652 RIALTO 2,793,856 3,022,155 5,816,012 3,077,960 2,961,998 6,039,958 SAN BERNARDINO 5,905,037 6,371,084 12,276,121 6,489,031 6,260,418 12,749,449 TWENTYNINE PALMS 748,372 816,360 1,564,732 831,308 793,411 1,624,719 UPLAND 2,094,499 2,266,855 4,361,354 2,308,690 2,220,552 4,529,242 VICTORVILLE 3,732,014 4,032,005 7,764,019 4,106,548 3,956,617 8,063,165 YUCAIPA 1,451,328 1,574,535 3,025,864 1,603,524 1,538,673 3,142,197 YUCCA VALLEY 582,961 637,309 1,220,270 648,953 618,045 1,266,998 County of San Bernardino 46,280,572 53,172,142 99,452,714 54,150,186 49,065,867 103,216,052 Total Cities & County: San Bernardino 97,049,490 108,692,879 205,742,369 110,684,975 102,890,201 213,575,176 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
857

Page 14 of 21 ends

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 3,079,766 3,357,142 6,436,907 3,419,140 3,265,115 6,684,254 CHULA VISTA 7,447,487 8,097,248 15,544,734 8,247,171 7,895,697 16,142,868 CORONADO 622,051 684,886 1,306,937 697,408 659,488 1,356,896 DEL MAR 104,566 119,281 223,847 121,386 110,859 232,246 EL CAJON 2,813,864 3,068,570 5,882,434 3,125,215 2,983,211 6,108,426 ENCINITAS 1,639,712 1,791,811 3,431,522 1,824,819 1,738,394 3,563,213 ESCONDIDO 4,003,976 4,360,149 8,364,124 4,440,752 4,244,946 8,685,698 IMPERIAL BEACH 703,380 774,149 1,477,529 788,309 745,711 1,534,020 LA MESA 1,611,976 1,761,710 3,373,686 1,794,160 1,708,989 3,503,149 LEMON GROVE 745,355 819,703 1,565,057 834,707 790,212 1,624,919 NATIONAL CITY 1,560,553 1,705,903 3,266,455 1,737,318 1,654,471 3,391,789 OCEANSIDE 4,614,038 5,022,223 9,636,261 5,115,107 4,891,724 10,006,831 POWAY 1,333,318 1,459,294 2,792,612 1,486,135 1,413,561 2,899,695 SAN DIEGO 37,288,565 40,492,530 77,781,095 41,243,176 39,532,696 80,775,872 SAN MARCOS 2,570,432 2,801,883 5,372,316 2,853,628 2,725,128 5,578,756 SANTEE 1,578,787 1,725,692 3,304,480 1,757,475 1,673,803 3,431,278 SOLANA BEACH 343,684 380,786 724,470 387,705 364,368 752,073 VISTA 2,688,893 2,930,444 5,619,337 2,984,573 2,850,718 5,835,291 County of San Diego 63,831,470 76,367,553 140,199,023 77,791,049 67,673,027 145,464,076 Total Cities & County: San Diego 138,581,872 157,720,957 296,302,828 160,649,233 146,922,119 307,571,351

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO - City Allocation 23,130,133 23,639,540 46,769,673 24,078,779 24,522,170 48,600,949 SAN FRANCISCO - County Allocation 11,969,329 12,361,097 24,330,426 12,590,824 12,689,677 25,280,501 Total San Francisco 35,099,462 36,000,637 71,100,099 36,669,602 37,211,847 73,881,450

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 197,011 218,722 415,733 222,654 208,868 431,522 LATHROP 1,021,472 1,109,582 2,131,053 1,129,971 1,082,947 2,212,918 LODI 1,775,666 1,922,357 3,698,023 1,957,801 1,882,531 3,840,331 MANTECA 2,480,714 2,680,766 5,161,479 2,730,283 2,630,010 5,360,293 MOUNTAIN HOUSE 762,081 831,537 1,593,618 844,771 807,945 1,652,716 RIPON 423,134 463,959 887,093 472,405 448,600 921,005
STOCKTON 8,492,248 9,149,781 17,642,030 9,319,294 9,003,336 18,322,630 TRACY 2,599,333 2,808,363 5,407,696 2,860,248 2,755,768 5,616,016 County of San Joaquin 19,618,834 20,959,126 40,577,960 21,353,886 20,799,551 42,153,437 Total Cities & County: San Joaquin 36,608,412 39,312,655 75,921,067 40,046,542 38,811,609 78,858,152 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
858

Page 15 of 21 ends

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 485,567 547,374 1,032,941 557,355 514,790 1,072,144 ATASCADERO 815,145 914,930 1,730,075 931,685 864,203 1,795,888 EL PASO DE ROBLES 830,574 932,044 1,762,619 949,116 880,561 1,829,677 GROVER BEACH 338,470 383,220 721,690 390,177 358,840 749,017 MORRO BAY 279,399 317,699 597,098 323,442 296,214 619,656 PISMO BEACH 213,155 243,224 456,379 247,606 225,983 473,589 SAN LUIS OBISPO 1,310,954 1,464,864 2,775,819 1,491,811 1,389,851 2,881,662 County of San Luis Obispo 10,637,141 10,674,268 21,311,409 10,865,041 11,277,314 22,142,355 Total Cities & County: San Luis Obispo 14,910,406 15,477,624 30,388,030 15,756,233 15,807,756 31,563,989

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 190,077 212,942 403,019 216,766 201,516 418,282 BELMONT 746,493 820,385 1,566,878 835,403 791,419 1,626,822 BRISBANE 128,385 145,036 273,422 147,619 136,112 283,731 BURLINGAME 835,047 916,424 1,751,471 933,223 885,303 1,818,526 COLMA 39,222 48,337 87,559 49,126 41,583 90,709
DALY CITY 2,774,563 3,023,864 5,798,427 3,079,682 2,941,544 6,021,225 EAST PALO ALTO 794,872 872,853 1,667,726 888,844 842,710 1,731,554 FOSTER CITY 891,525 977,675 1,869,200 995,611 945,180 1,940,790 HALF MOON BAY 310,999 345,084 656,083 351,341 329,716 681,056 HILLSBOROUGH 300,995 334,235 635,229 340,290 319,110 659,399 MENLO PARK 903,673 990,850 1,894,523 1,009,030 958,058 1,967,088 MILLBRAE 617,208 679,173 1,296,381 691,590 654,353 1,345,943 PACIFICA 1,023,563 1,120,872 2,144,435 1,141,464 1,085,164 2,226,628 PORTOLA VALLEY 117,429 133,153 250,582 135,516 124,496 260,011 REDWOOD CITY 2,208,672 2,407,646 4,616,318 2,452,079 2,341,596 4,793,675 SAN BRUNO 1,164,519 1,273,742 2,438,262 1,297,170 1,234,603 2,531,773 SAN CARLOS 813,504 893,060 1,706,564 909,426 862,463 1,771,889 SAN MATEO 2,797,879 3,049,151 5,847,030 3,105,438 2,966,263 6,071,701 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1,753,567 1,914,076 3,667,643 1,949,353 1,859,102 3,808,455 WOODSIDE 140,454 159,125 299,578 161,950 148,907 310,857 County of San Mateo 14,253,879 17,140,396 31,394,275 17,470,269 15,111,717 32,581,986 Total Cities & County: San Mateo 32,806,524 37,458,081 70,264,605 38,161,188 34,780,913 72,942,101 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
859

Page 16 of 21 ends

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 136,140 150,205 286,344 152,868 144,333 297,201 CARPINTERIA 347,786 374,145 721,932 380,950 368,717 749,667 GOLETA 866,674 923,722 1,790,396 940,679 918,833 1,859,511GUADALUPE 234,248 253,549 487,797 258,132 248,346 506,478 LOMPOC 1,178,917 1,252,628 2,431,544 1,275,693 1,249,867 2,525,560 SANTA BARBARA 2,313,318 2,449,065 4,762,382 2,494,324 2,452,540 4,946,864 SANTA MARIA 2,969,668 3,142,940 6,112,608 3,201,041 3,148,391 6,349,433 SOLVANG 153,872 168,883 322,755 171,893 163,132 335,026 County of Santa Barbara 10,705,924 12,129,055 22,834,979 12,363,098 11,350,236 23,713,334 Total Cities & County: Santa Barbara 18,906,546 20,844,192 39,750,738 21,238,679 20,044,395 41,283,074

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 1,157,268 1,254,093 2,411,360 1,277,165 1,226,915 2,504,080 CUPERTINO 1,596,890 1,727,894 3,324,784 1,759,731 1,692,995 3,452,727 GILROY 1,646,302 1,780,979 3,427,280 1,813,801 1,745,381 3,559,182 LOS ALTOS 839,493 912,697 1,752,190 929,434 890,016 1,819,450 LOS ALTOS HILLS 226,229 249,846 476,075 254,356 239,844 494,200 LOS GATOS 885,147 961,744 1,846,891 979,391 938,417 1,917,808 MILPITAS 2,167,941 2,341,395 4,509,336 2,384,617 2,298,414 4,683,031 MONTE SERENO 96,256 109,211 205,467 111,130 102,049 213,179 MORGAN HILL 1,233,277 1,335,752 2,569,030 1,360,340 1,307,499 2,667,839 MOUNTAIN VIEW 2,289,631 2,472,130 4,761,761 2,517,778 2,427,427 4,945,205 PALO ALTO 1,820,684 1,968,324 3,789,009 2,004,623 1,930,258 3,934,881 SAN JOSE 26,795,295 28,811,914 55,607,209 29,346,130 28,407,911 57,754,041 SANTA CLARA 3,561,945 3,841,521 7,403,466 3,912,535 3,776,313 7,688,848 SARATOGA 823,349 895,353 1,718,702 911,768 872,901 1,784,668 SUNNYVALE 4,225,865 4,554,793 8,780,658 4,639,044 4,480,189 9,119,233 County of Santa Clara 33,048,319 39,483,272 72,531,591 40,216,946 35,037,260 75,254,206 Total Cities & County: Santa Clara 82,413,891 92,700,917 175,114,808 94,418,789 87,373,791 181,792,580 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
860

Page 17 of 21 ends

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 260,926 284,590 545,515 289,747 276,629 566,376 SANTA CRUZ 1,712,201 1,835,162 3,547,363 1,869,003 1,815,246 3,684,250 SCOTTS VALLEY 319,415 347,859 667,274 354,172 338,638 692,811 WATSONVILLE 1,371,164 1,472,083 2,843,247 1,499,184 1,453,684 2,952,868 County of Santa Cruz 6,853,490 7,806,822 14,660,312 7,947,817 7,265,953 15,213,770 Total Cities & County: Santa Cruz 10,517,196 11,746,516 22,263,711 11,959,923 11,150,151 23,110,074

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 295,649 338,020 633,669 344,138 313,442 657,580 REDDING 2,481,058 2,783,478 5,264,536 2,834,818 2,630,375 5,465,193 SHASTA LAKE 273,709 313,515 587,223 319,178 290,181 609,360 County of Shasta 8,150,831 7,932,178 16,083,009 8,076,084 8,641,371 16,717,454 Total Cities & County: Shasta 11,201,246 11,367,191 22,568,438 11,574,218 11,875,368 23,449,587

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 19,532 27,043 46,575 27,411 20,707 48,118
County of Sierra 1,448,977 1,319,971 2,768,948 1,336,971 1,536,181 2,873,152 Total City & County: Sierra 1,468,509 1,347,014 2,815,523 1,364,382 1,556,888 2,921,270

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 22,708 31,020 53,728 31,488 24,074 55,562
DUNSMUIR 45,071 92,380 137,451 93,308 47,784 141,091
ETNA 18,103 25,906 44,008 26,278 19,192 45,470
FORT JONES 18,367 26,200 44,567 26,578 19,473 46,050
MONTAGUE 32,526 41,925 74,452 42,595 34,484 77,079
MOUNT SHASTA 85,775 163,392 249,167 165,157 90,938 256,095 TULELAKE 23,819 32,255 56,074 32,745 25,253 57,998
WEED 77,254 132,757 210,010 134,347 81,903 216,249
YREKA 208,524 245,783 454,307 250,075 221,073 471,148
County of Siskiyou 5,838,701 5,194,625 11,033,326 5,266,311 6,190,090 11,456,401 Total Cities & County: Siskiyou 6,370,848 5,986,242 12,357,090 6,068,881 6,754,263 12,823,143 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
861

Page 18 of 21 ends

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 716,745 785,935 1,502,680 800,315 759,881 1,560,196 DIXON 533,920 586,215 1,120,135 596,928 566,053 1,162,980 FAIRFIELD 3,194,945 3,470,019 6,664,964 3,534,121 3,387,225 6,921,346 RIO VISTA 273,603 303,692 577,295 309,181 290,069 599,250 SUISUN CITY 779,522 853,825 1,633,347 869,465 826,436 1,695,901VACAVILLE 2,730,762 2,968,022 5,698,784 3,022,811 2,895,107 5,917,917 VALLEJO 3,332,990 3,619,310 6,952,300 3,686,182 3,533,579 7,219,760 County of Solano 10,059,557 11,048,788 21,108,345 11,253,932 10,664,969 21,918,901 Total Cities & County: Solano 21,622,043 23,635,807 45,257,850 24,072,934 22,923,319 46,996,252

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 238,430 265,276 503,706 270,071 252,779 522,850 COTATI 200,637 224,305 424,942 228,340 212,712 441,052
HEALDSBURG 299,275 332,236 631,511 338,254 317,286 655,540 PETALUMA 1,583,392 1,728,816 3,312,208 1,760,657 1,678,686 3,439,343 ROHNERT PARK 1,166,398 1,275,263 2,441,661 1,298,719 1,236,595 2,535,314 SANTA ROSA 4,722,865 5,134,738 9,857,603 5,229,714 5,007,100 10,236,814 SEBASTOPOL 199,102 222,641 421,743 226,645 211,084 437,729 SONOMA 285,036 316,800 601,836 322,532 302,190 624,723
WINDSOR 693,852 762,988 1,456,840 776,941 735,610 1,512,551 County of Sonoma 14,815,219 15,936,239 30,751,458 16,225,847 15,706,841 31,932,688 Total Cities & County: Sonoma 24,204,206 26,199,302 50,403,508 26,677,720 25,660,884 52,338,604

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 1,329,374 1,436,127 2,765,501 1,462,553 1,409,380 2,871,933 HUGHSON 211,117 232,917 444,034 237,114 223,823 460,937 MODESTO 5,816,244 6,244,291 12,060,535 6,359,910 6,166,282 12,526,192 NEWMAN 327,884 358,980 686,865 365,498 347,617 713,115
OAKDALE 614,826 668,309 1,283,135 680,531 651,828 1,332,359 PATTERSON 684,616 744,058 1,428,674 757,667 725,818 1,483,485 RIVERBANK 690,491 750,351 1,440,842 764,077 732,047 1,496,124 TURLOCK 1,911,330 2,059,430 3,970,760 2,097,425 2,026,359 4,123,784 WATERFORD 242,664 266,706 509,370 271,530 257,269 528,798 County of Stanislaus 15,239,264 15,876,689 31,115,953 16,168,328 16,156,406 32,324,734 Total Cities & County: Stanislaus 27,067,810 28,637,859 55,705,669 29,164,633 28,696,828 57,861,461 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
862

Page 19 of 21 ends

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 255,606 279,142 534,748 284,198 270,989 555,187 YUBA CITY 1,864,591 1,998,978 3,863,569 2,035,859 1,976,807 4,012,666 County of Sutter 4,649,433 4,240,916 8,890,349 4,319,708 4,929,249 9,248,957 Total Cities & County: Sutter 6,769,630 6,519,036 13,288,666 6,639,765 7,177,046 13,816,811

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 218,819 239,957 458,775 244,285 231,988 476,273 RED BLUFF 391,905 425,384 817,289 433,136 415,491 848,627 TEHAMA 11,486 18,039 29,525 18,266 12,177 30,443
County of Tehama 5,136,169 4,310,399 9,446,568 4,375,913 5,445,278 9,821,191 Total Cities & County: Tehama 5,758,379 4,993,778 10,752,157 5,071,600 6,104,934 11,176,534

TRINITY COUNTY
County of Trinity 2,707,654 2,379,374 5,087,028 2,412,112 2,870,608 5,282,720

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 688,771 741,547 1,430,318 755,116 730,223 1,485,339 EXETER 273,920 298,414 572,335 303,810 290,406 594,216
FARMERSVILLE 275,032 299,594 574,626 305,011 291,584 596,596 LINDSAY 336,777 365,101 701,878 371,735 357,045 728,780 PORTERVILLE 1,683,804 1,798,721 3,482,525 1,831,891 1,785,140 3,617,031 TULARE 1,932,052 2,062,099 3,994,151 2,100,159 2,048,329 4,148,488 VISALIA 3,889,882 4,141,747 8,031,629 4,218,375 4,123,986 8,342,361 WOODLAKE 211,858 231,570 443,428 235,743 224,609 460,352 County of Tulare 18,422,164 16,798,739 35,220,903 17,110,221 19,530,862 36,641,083 Total Cities & County: Tulare 27,714,260 26,737,532 54,451,792 27,232,063 29,382,182 56,614,245

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 137,701 163,250 300,951 166,147 145,989 312,135
County of Tuolumne 3,605,615 3,594,460 7,200,075 3,658,131 3,822,611 7,480,742 Total City & County: Tuolumne 3,743,316 3,757,710 7,501,026 3,824,278 3,968,599 7,792,877 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
863

Page 20 of 21 ends

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 1,873,060 2,043,475 3,916,535 2,081,153 1,985,786 4,066,939 FILLMORE 450,844 497,702 948,546 506,771 477,977 984,748 MOORPARK 958,589 1,050,309 2,008,898 1,069,592 1,016,280 2,085,871 OJAI 203,469 227,444 430,913 231,537 215,714 447,251
OXNARD 5,338,114 5,803,532 11,141,646 5,910,912 5,659,377 11,570,289 PORT HUENEME 583,967 643,062 1,227,029 654,809 619,111 1,273,921 SAN BUENAVENTURA 2,913,349 3,174,080 6,087,429 3,232,684 3,088,683 6,321,367 SANTA PAULA 837,853 919,380 1,757,233 936,234 888,277 1,824,511 SIMI VALLEY 3,339,950 3,636,693 6,976,643 3,703,879 3,540,958 7,244,837 THOUSAND OAKS 3,356,544 3,654,688 7,011,232 3,722,207 3,558,551 7,280,758 County of Ventura 17,339,270 20,897,117 38,236,387 21,285,366 18,382,796 39,668,163 Total Cities & County: Ventura 37,195,009 42,547,482 79,742,491 43,335,145 39,433,509 82,768,654

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 1,731,468 1,898,472 3,629,941 1,933,454 1,835,673 3,769,127 WEST SACRAMENTO 1,466,282 1,609,591 3,075,873 1,639,215 1,554,527 3,193,742 WINTERS 212,282 238,049 450,330 242,338 225,057 467,395 WOODLAND 1,630,899 1,788,917 3,419,815 1,821,866 1,729,051 3,550,917 County of Yolo 6,655,039 6,604,226 13,259,265 6,726,537 7,055,558 13,782,095 Total Cities & County: Yolo 11,695,969 12,139,255 23,835,224 12,363,409 12,399,866 24,763,275

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 348,316 372,009 720,324 378,776 369,278 748,054 WHEATLAND 106,181 116,825 223,006 118,888 112,571 231,459 County of Yuba 3,830,709 3,589,434 7,420,143 3,656,011 4,061,252 7,717,263 Total Cities & County: Yuba 4,285,205 4,078,268 8,363,473 4,153,675 4,543,101 8,696,776 Statewide Total $ 1,870,616,000 $ 1,606,740,000 $ 3,477,356,000 $ 1,944,947,000 $ 1,770,173,000 $ 3,715,120,000 January 2026 CaliforniaCityFinance.com
864

Page 21 of 21 ends

City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Agenda Item #:7
Agenda Item: Community Corrections Partnership
Executive Summary: Assembly Bill 109 created the California Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, which shifted supervision of non-violent, non-serious, and non-high-risk sex offenders from state parole to local county probation upon release from state prison; this group, known as the realigned population, is now supervised at the county level rather than by state parole officers. Each county is required to establish a Community Corrections Partnership (CCP), consisting of local justice stakeholders such as Probation, the Sheriff, and the District Attorney, to plan and oversee the use of AB 109 funds, which support community-based corrections, supervision, and evidence-based programs aimed at reducing recidivism. In March 2023, SLTPD entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with El Dorado County Probation, making the department eligible for AB 109 funding, although it has not yet utilized these funds. In October 2025, the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors approved the FY 2025â€“26 CCP budget, allocating $20,000 for SLTPD to partner with El Dorado County Probation, with the funding designated to support training and specialized enforcement services in South Lake Tahoe in alignment with the CCPâ€™s goal of reducing recidivism among the realigned population.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions:

Pass a Resolution: 1) authorizing and directing the Chief of Police to execute the First Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding #7399 for the FY 2025-26 Community Corrections Partnership Budget; 2) authorizing reimbursement up to $20,000.00 from the El Dorado County Probation Department into the Administration - Police Special Services account; and, 3) approving an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 budget as follows: 10002110 - 34210
Responsible Staff Member: Lt. Russell Liles
Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Community Corrections Partnership.docx 02-Resolution - Community Corrections Patrnership.docx
03-2023 MOU between El Dorado Probation and SLTPD
04-Amendment No. I to MOU between El Dorado Probation and the Police Departments - unsigned.pdf
865
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Title: Community Corrections Partnership
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Lt. Russell Liles (530) 542-6120 Background: Assembly Bill 109 established the California Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, which allows for current non-violent, non-serious, and non-high-risk sex offenders, after they are released from California State prison, to be supervised at the local County level.

Instead of reporting to state parole officers, these offenders - known as the realigned population - report to local county probation officers.

Each county is required to establish a Community Corrections Partnership (CCP), composed of local justice system stakeholders such as Probation, the Sheriff, and the District Attorney, to develop and implement a plan for the use of AB 109 funds. These funds are intended to support community-based corrections, supervision, and evidence-based programs designed to reduce recidivism among the realigned population. On March 21, 2023, former South Lake Tahoe Police Department (SLTPD) Chief Stevenson executed a Memorandum of Understanding #7399 with the El Dorado County Probation Department, authorizing SLTPD’s participation in the agreement and establishing eligibility to access AB 109 funding. To date, SLTPD has not accessed these funds.

On October 28, 2025, the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors approved the Fiscal Year 2025– 26 Community Corrections Partnership budget, which included $20,000 for the South Lake Tahoe Police Department to partner with the El Dorado County Probation Department (EDCPD) to receive training and provide specialized enforcement services for the City of South Lake Tahoe in support of the CCP’s operational goal of reducing recidivism among the realigned population.

Issue and Discussion: This item is before the City Council for approval of the attached First Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding No. 7399 between the City of South Lake Tahoe Police Department and the El Dorado County Probation Department. Upon execution of this MOU amendment, the South Lake Tahoe Police Department may request up to $20,000 in funding for training and may provide specific enforcement and support operations directed toward the realigned population within the city limits and in unincorporated areas of El Dorado County. These enforcement operations will be provided at a base hourly regular or overtime rate for regular full-time or reserve officers during the Fiscal Year 2025–26 Community Corrections Partnership budget period.

Financial Implications: There will be no additional burden to the General Fund as a result of this agreement. Any Officers utilized for the specialized enforcement details or trainings have been budgeted as an existing allocation for the Police Department. The El Dorado County Probation District may reimburse the South Lake Tahoe Police Department for training cost or specialized 866
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 2
enforcement details related to reducing recidivism among the realigned population in the amount up to $20,000.

Once received, these funds will be applied to account # 100 02110 34210 Environmental Considerations: The proposed action is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) (creation of government funding mechanisms or government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment).

Policy Implications: This proposed agreement with El Dorado County Probation supports the following strategic priorities: Priority 3 – Public Safety 867
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 19, 2026
First Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding #7399 with El Dorado County Probation Department for FY 2025-26 Community Corrections Partnership with reimbursement from El Dorado County Probation Department to the City in the amount up to $20,000.00

BACKGROUND
A. Assembly Bill 109 created the California Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, shifting supervision of non-violent, non-serious, and non-high-risk sex offenders from state parole to local county probation upon release from state prison. This population, known as the realigned population, is supervised at the county level rather than by state parole officers.

B. Each county must establish a Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) made up of local justice stakeholders, including Probation, the Sheriff, and the District Attorney, to plan and oversee the use of AB 109 funds. These funds support community-based corrections, supervision, and evidence-based programs aimed at reducing recidivism.

In March 2023, SLTPD entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with El Dorado County Probation, making the department eligible for AB 109 funding, though it has not yet utilized these funds.

C. In October 2025, the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors approved the FY 2025–26 CCP budget, allocating $20,000 for SLTPD to partner with El Dorado County Probation. The funding supports training and specialized enforcement services in South Lake Tahoe, aligning with the CCP’s goal of reducing recidivism among the realigned population.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorizes and directs the Chief of Police to execute the First Admendment to Memorandum of Understanding # 7399 for the FY 2025-26 Community Corrections Partnership Budget, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

2. Authorizes reimbursement up to $20,000.00 from the El Dorado County Probation Department into the Administartion - Police Special Services account and approves an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 budget as follows:
868
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 2
10002110-34210 Police Special Services (+) $20,000.00
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on Mayy 19, 2026 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
869
Placerville Police Department Memorandum of Understanding #7398 South Lake Tahoe Police Department Memorandum of Understanding #7399 Managing the Effects of Public Safety Realignment Enforcement Operations Program Funded through Community Corrections Partnership
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU"), entered into this 2/ day of /1,,( '12 re,i , 2023, by and between the Placerville Police Department, hereinafter called "PPD," South Lake Tahoe Police Department, hereinafter called "SLTPD," and the El Dorado County Probation Departmen4 hereinafter called "EDCPD"; is related to public safety operations necessary as a direct result of the public safety realignment legislation (AB 109) passage, hereinafter called "Managing the Effects of Public Safety Realignment Enforcement Operations" program funded through the Community Corrections Partnership ("CCP").

WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable that PPD and SLTPD, working in participation with EDCPD, be retained for the purpose of performing certain special enforcement services for the Cities of Placerville and South Lake Tahoe that are needed to support the operational goal of reduced recidivism as identified by the CCP in the plan for realignment.

WHEREAS, EDCPD has agreed to facilitate the reimbursement to PPD and SLTPD for services under this MOU through such Partnership;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the Parties hereto as follows:

1. Services to be Performed by PPD, SLTPD, and Participation from EDCPD During the term of each CCP approved fiscal year budget, PPD and SLTPD may provide specific enforcement and support operations directed toward the realigned population, both within city limits and in unincorporated areas of El Dorado County. These enforcement operations will be provided on a base hourly regular or overtime rate for regular full-time or Reserve officers, as staffing levels allow.

PPD and SLTPD salary schedules as published will be used for determining claimable program staff. Enforcement operations shall occur four (4) times, minimally, per MOU term. These enforcement operations are to be funded as long as approved in advance by EDCPD and will include, but are not limited to:
a. Sweeps/clean-ups in specific "target areas" frequented by the realigned population as identified by either EDCPD or the respective local police agency. Assisting EDCPD with individual visitations to the realigned population that have been assessed to have a high risk of recidivism.
b. Completing special investigations in cooperation with EDCPD, focused on the realigned population who are suspected of new criminal law violations and/or in non-compliance with terms and conditions of supervision.
c. Joint operation funding when dealing with target areas.

Placerville Police Department
South Lake Tahoe Police Department
JSC
I of5 #7398 & #7399
870
d. Enforcement of ordinances frequently violated by the realigned population. e. Temporary housing specifically pertaining to the realigned population. f. Enforcement operations provided by the South Lake Tahoe Police Department Homeless Liaison Officer (AKA: STACS Officer).
g. Activities pertaining to Tahoe Coalition for Homeless, specifically pertaining to the realigned population.
h. Alternative enforcement activity.

Upon reasonable notice and request, EDCPD commits to participate in each such enforcement by providing sworn personnel to assist as staffing levels allow and, at minimum, providing intelligence pertaining to individuals released to Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) and/or Mandatory Community Supervision (MCS) in El Dorado County. EDCPD shall participate with PPD and SLTPD in planning activities for Managing the Effects of Public Safety Realignment Enforcements and shall assist with facilitating the funding+- to PPD and SLTPD, as established by CCP Implementation plan.

During the term of each CCP approved fiscal year budget, PPD and SLTPD shall be able to have staff attend program or operations related trainings. Authorization by the Chief Probation Officer is required prior to attendance. Reimbursement, in accordance with El Dorado County Travel Policy D-1, will consist of actual cost of registration, tuition, materials, meals, and travel related costs (hotel and mileage), but shall not include salary.

2. Payment
Upon completion of each enforcement operation PPD and SLTPD will submit an invoice to the EDCPD, due and payable within forty five (45) days following receipt and verification by EDCPD, defining the date, hours, and list of personnel (name, rank, and salary step) involved in the operation. Using the published salary rates for City of Placerville, and City of South Lake Tahoe, only base hourly rate or overtime rates, exclusive of benefits, associated with the specific operation will be claimable. Invoices shall be mailed to County at the following address:

Connty of El Dorado
Probation Department - Fiscal
3974 Durock Rd, Ste. 205
Shingle Springs, CA 95682
or emailed to [email protected]
EDCPD will verify each invoice before submitting it to the Chief Administrative Office for reimbursement through the CCP funding.

The annual maximum amount of reimbursement provided under this MOU shall not exceed the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement amount as stated in the AB 109 Budget approved by the CCP each year.

Placerville Police Department
South Lake Tahoe Police Department
JSC
2 of5 #7398 & #7399
871
Funding for this agreement is approved by the CCP Executive Committee on an annual basis.

Should the CCP Executive Committee, during the course of a given year for financial reasons reduce, or order a reduction, in the funding for services provided under this agreement, pursuant to this paragraph, this agreement may be deemed to be canceled in its entirety subject to payment for services performed prior to cancellation.

3. Statistical Reporting
The parties hereto agree to meet on a quarterly basis during the term of this MOU to collaborate on the progress of the Managing the Effects of Public Safety Realignment Enforcements. PPD and SLTPD shall make available to EDCPD statistical information resulting from Managing the Effects of Public Safety Realignment Enforcements. This information shall include, but not be limited to, burglary and theft statistics, calls for service relating to transient offenders, and calls for service relating to the targeted treatment areas. Furthermore, the parties agree to share all information gained under the Managing the Effects of Public Safety Realignment Enforcements that is mutually beneficial to share from a public safety standpoint. At the end of the operational year, the PPD, SLTPD, and EDCPD will collaborate on a report to the CCP detailing activities and success of the program.

4. Alteration of Memorandum of Understanding
This MOU is entire and contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No alteration or variation shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement shall be binding on the parties hereto.

5. Records
a. Access PPD and SL TPD agree to provide to EDCPD, to any Federal or State department having monitoring or reviewing authority, to authorized representatives and/or their appropriate audit agencies upon reasonable notice; access to and the right to examine and audit all records and documents necessary to determine compliance with relevant Federal, State, and local statutes, rules and regulations, and this MOU; and to evaluate the quality, appropriateness, and timeliness of services performed; for a period of at least three (3) years from the termination date of this MOU, or until audit findings are resolved; whichever is greater.
b. Retention EDCPD shall maintain and preserve in its possession all records relating to this MOU for a period of at least three (3) years from the termination date of this MOU, or until audit findings are resolved, whichever is greater.

6. Compliance with Applicable Laws
All services to be performed by PPD, SLTPD, and EDCPD pursuant to this MOU shall be performed in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, County, and Municipal laws, ordinances, and regulations.

7. Term of the Agreement
Subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this MOU, the term of this MOU shall be upon final execution through June 30, 2023. Commencing July I, 2023 and each July I thereafter, the term of this MOU shall be renewed automatically for one year beyond its then expiration date contingent upon CCP Executive Committee approval, CCP budget and funding Placerville Police Department
South Lake Tahoe Police Department
JSC
3 of5 #7398 & #7399
872
approval, and El Dorado County Board of Supervisors approval of the CCP budget for that fiscal year.

8. Contract Administrator
The County Officer or employee with responsibility for administering this MOU is Brian Richart, Chief Probation Officer, Probation Department, or successor.

9. Counterparts
This MOU may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

10. Electronic Signatures
Each party agrees that the signatures, whether digital or encrypted, of the parties included in this Agreement, are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic Signature means any electronic visual symbol or signature attached to or logically associated with a record and executed and adopted by a party with the intent to sign such record, including facsimile or email electronic signatures, pursuant to the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17) as amended from time to time.

11. Agreement
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
This document and the documents referred to herein or exhibits hereto are the entire Agreement between the parties, and they incorporate or supersede all prior written or oral agreements or understandings.

Placerville Police Department
South Lake Tahoe Police Department
JSC
4of5 #7398 & #7399
873
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Understanding on the day and year last written below.
-- COUN TY OF EL DORADO --
ATTEST:

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

LICE DEPARTMENT
Dated: 3-,:2 / -2..3
By: ~~ 7/J~
Chair
Board of Supervisors
"County"
Dated: 3-:Z/. 2 f
Dated:

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE POLICE DEPARTMENT
By: --------------- David Stevenson
Chief of Police
Placerville Police Department
South Lake Tahoe Police Department
JSC
5 of5
Dated:
#7398 & #7399
874
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum of Understanding on the day and year last written below.
-- COUNTY OF EL DORADO --
ATTEST:

Kim Dawson
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: ---------------- Deputy Clerk

PLACERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
By: ---------------- Joseph Wren
Chief of Police
Dated:

By:-- ------------
Dated:

Dated:

Chair
Board of Supervisors
"County"

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE POLICE DEPARTMENT
By: ~ ? ~ • ..--vavldStevenso
Chief of Police
Placerville Police Depattment
South Lake Tahoe Police Department
JSC
5 of5
Dated: .3J~ /2 >
7/
#7398 & #7399
875
876
877
878
879
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Agenda Item #:8
Agenda Item: Amendment to Ordinance Regulating Shared Mobility Devices (Second Reading) Executive Summary: On February 11, 2020, City Council adopted Ordinance 2020-1140 adding Chapter 4.185 to the South Lake Tahoe City Code (SLTCC). On March 26, 2024, City Council adopted Ordinance 2024-1184 amending SLTCC Chapter 4.185 to add a requirement that shared mobility devices be parked in corrals and adding additional requirements to implement the corrals. At the City Council meeting on March 11, 2025, City Council directed staff to bring an item back with a presentation of potential options for amending Chapter 4.185 to increase the Cityâ€™s liability protections from shared mobility device accidents, add safety measures for same, and update operator insurance requirements. Staff brought this item back at the City Council meeting on June 3, 2025 at which time Council directed staff to incorporate the proposals into an ordinance. Staff brought this item back for a first reading of a proposed ordinance on March 10, 2026. At that time, Council declined to adopt the ordinance and instead requested additional amendments related to parking, permissible bikeways, and photo enforcement. A first reading of the proposed amendment, with the additional revisions requested by Council, was considered and approved by City Council at the Council meeting on May 5, 2026. The present agenda item brings that proposed amendment back for a second reading and adoption.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass an Ordinance amending Chapter 4.185 of the South Lake Tahoe City Code (Shared Mobility Devices) to increase the City’s liability protections from shared mobility device accidents, add safety measures for shared mobility device operations, and revise operator insurance requirements.

Responsible Staff Member: Dan Bardzell, Assistant City Attorney; Jeff Roberson, Police Chief Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01 - Staff Report (Second Reading)
02 - SMD Ordinance (Redline)
03 - SMD Ordinance Amendments
04 - Proof of Publication-SMD Ordinance
880
Staff Report for City Council Meeting of May 19, 2026 1 of 6 City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Title: Ordinance Amending Shared Mobility Device Regulations (Second Reading) Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Members: Dan Bardzell, Assistant City Attorney; Jeff Roberson, Chief of Police
Background: On February 11, 2020, City Council adopted Ordinance 2020-1140 adding Chapter 4.185 to the South Lake Tahoe City Code (SLTCC). This ordinance regulates Shared Mobility Devices (SMDs). For purposes of this ordinance, a “shared mobility device” is defined, in pertinent part, as any wheeled transportation device, other than a bicycle, e-bicycle, automobile or motorcycle, by which a person can be propelled, moved or drawn; is accessed via an on-demand portal, whether a smartphone application, membership card, or similar method. On March 26, 2024, City Council adopted Ordinance 2024-1184 amending SLTCC Chapter 4.185 to add a requirement that SMDs be parked in corrals and adding additional requirements to implement the corrals.

At the City Council meeting on March 11, 2025, Council considered and declined to adopt an ordinance to further amend SLTCC Chapter 4.185 which would have caused a 50 percent reduction in SMDs permitted within the City. Instead, City Council directed staff to bring an item back with a presentation of potential options for increasing (1) the City’s liability protections from SMD accidents, (2) safety measures for SMD operations, and (3) updating shared mobility device operator insurance requirements. Staff brought this item back at the City Council meeting on June 3, 2025 at which time Council directed staff to incorporate the proposals into an ordinance and bring it back for Council’s consideration.

Staff brought this item back for a first reading of a proposed ordinance on March 10, 2026. At that time, Council declined to adopt the ordinance and instead requested additional amendments related to parking, permissible bikeways, and photo enforcement.

Staff brought the item back, with Council’s requested revisions, as a first reading of the proposed amendment which was considered and approved by City Council at the Council meeting on May 5, 2026. The present agenda item brings that proposed amendment back for a second reading and adoption.

Issue and Discussion:

City Council’s requested amendments are included in the proposed Ordinance, as summarized below.
881
Staff Report for City Council Meeting of May 19, 2026 2 of 6 Liability Protections
End User Agreement Liability Waivers
Both operators already utilize municipal waivers in their end user agreements including generic language in which riders waive liability against public entities for incidents which occur during a ride. Based on discussions with the operators, staff learned that some public entities require Bird and/or Lime to include waivers specific to the public entity. The proposed amendment would add permitting requirements in which operators must require riders to acknowledge waivers specifically waiving claims against the City.

Add a Permitting Requirement that Operators will Pay the City’s Attorney’s Fees SLTCC section 4.185.050(C)(2) requires the operator to agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City from liability for SMD accidents, including “any and all costs and expenses.” The proposed amendment would add language which requires the operator to expressly pay the City’s attorney’s fees for claims, lawsuits and similar matters. Although this section may already potentially cover attorney’s fees, adding clarifying language would provide additional protection.

Drivers License Re-Scanning
The proposed amendment would add permit requirements to require operators to make each rider re-scan their ID the first time they ride an SMD in the operator’s fleet within the City each calendar year.

Operator Insurance Updates
State law has been amended to revise the insurance requirements for SMD operators. To bring the City’s SMD framework into compliance with changes to state law, the proposed Ordinance revises City Code Chapter 4.185.050 as follows:
(1) increases the aggregate amount of liability insurance an operator must carry for all occurrences during the policy period from $4,000,000 to $5,000,000; (2) requires SMD operators procure insurance from an admitted insurer, or a nonadmitted insurer that is eligible to insure a home state insured; (3) requires operators to offer or make available, or confirm the rider maintains, insurance coverage for bodily injury or death suffered by a pedestrian when the injury or death involves the negligent conduct of the rider, of $10,000 for each occurrence, and for property damage to an assistive technology device, of $1,000 for each occurrence, and (4) make additional clarifying changes.
882
Staff Report for City Council Meeting of May 19, 2026 3 of 6 Engagement, Outreach, and Education
Modifications of SLTCC section 4.185.090 require operators to create a parking and safety education plan as part of their permit application. Operators should engage with riders to protect the safety of customers and all roadway users. Operators must educate riders about safety, and riding rules and etiquette at the time of sign-up. Operators must educate customers on how to appropriately park SMD devices. SMD apps must regularly inform and educate riders when they have ridden into prohibited riding areas such as Geofenced area, public parking facilities, public parks, and about staying off of sidewalks. Operators must inform their riders about special events, operational changes or scheduled and publicly-announced SLTPD enforcement actions through the mobile app. Operators must inform their riders that operating SMDs under the influence of drugs or alcohol is against the law. Operators must regularly deploy ambassadors and/or street teams to inform riders on safety and appropriate device use (including parking). Operators must conduct at minimum six community events or safety workshops per year, half of which must be targeted to less-served community members in multiple languages. Operators must host at minimum two learn to ride education opportunities per year. Engagements shall include a mix of virtual (digital media and in-app communications), physical, and in-person methods. This engagement should consider the needs and concerns of riders as well as non-riders. Operators shall plan for community outreach and engagement that shall include engagement activities and schedules, along with planned presentation, activities, and events with community-based organizations (CBO), business improvement districts (BIDS), and other key stakeholders. Operators must - on a monthly basis - report information from this outreach.

Safety Measures
Vehicle Code Enforcement
To address safety concerns centered on SMDs, staff has modified the following sections of the SLTCC.

4.185.020 (Definitions). Adds the definition of a Class III and Class IV bikeway. Although, CSLT has no Class IV bikeway, it is added to the definitions in the event that this class is subsequently built in the City.

SLTCC section 4.185.060 has been modified to add only Class IV bikeways. This section identifies a permit requirement to prohibit parking an SMD on such bikeways.

SLTCC section 4.185.060 (Issuance of Permits), has been modified from “City Manager” to “Chief of Police” wherein the authority sits for determining ride area prohibition (geofences).

An additional modification to 4.185.060 includes the addition of larger contrasting serial numbers on the SMDs for the purpose of unit identification in enforcement.

A modification of section 4.185.080 includes a consultation with the Director of Public Works to establish areas for ride and/or parking restrictions as well as parking corrals. 883
Staff Report for City Council Meeting of May 19, 2026 4 of 6 In conversations with the operators, they have agreed to facilitate holding riders accountable for ride violations, including vehicle code violations. Section 4.185.090 has been modified to reflect this agreement, in that the operators will provide rider information to assist with issuing administrative citations to riders.

SLTCC section 4.185.120 (Enforcement) has been modified to reinforce the use of photographic evidence from which to hold the operator and the rider accountable for violations of California Vehicle Code (“CVC”) sections 21228(b) (left turn must dismount), and 21235(e) (no passenger allowed). Additional potential CVC sections which were proposed to be added for photo enforcement in the previous version of the proposed ordinance have been removed from the version brought forward hereto. The photographic evidence would allow the operator sufficient information with which to provide rider information for the purpose of issuing a notice of such violations. The above SMD-specific sections of the California Vehicle Code have been added to clarify administrative citation through the use of photo enforcement.

The following additional issues were raised at the Council meeting on March 10, 2026:

1. Review and analyze possible updates to painting and signage on bikeways to ensure safety.

There was not sufficient time to conduct a comprehensive cost analysis before the present meeting but staff will work with Public Works to modify signage and paint to be consistent with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and aligned with existing signage on the Class I Shared Use path.

2. Enhancement of the corrals, including corral signage.

In line with guidance from City Council and collaboration with the operators, additional locations for corrals have been identified. The operators have agreed to “help” with the corral signage and location designation. However, while the undertone of help was to cover costs, that estimation or limit has yet to be defined. It might be more expedient for Public Works to physically mark the current corrals that are already defined and mark the additional corrals when those locations come online within the respective operator web applications. Finally, SLTPD and Public Works will collaborate on the corral signage language with the operators and identify the means of cost sharing.

3. Consider methods to further enforce the prohibition on riders under the age of 18.

The proposed amendment would add permit requirements to require operators to make each rider re-scan their ID the first time they ride an SMD in the operator’s fleet within the City each calendar year. This is intended to support the prohibition on underage riders.

While helpful to this goal, this mechanism will not achieve 100% compliance. Staff is not aware of any additional mechanism that will achieve that level of compliance. While the addition of a bicycle patrol officer may assist in reducing underage ridership, that result remains to be seen. Notably, SMDs are deployed from May 1 through October 31; a 884
Staff Report for City Council Meeting of May 19, 2026 5 of 6 season to which the temporary seasonal bicycle patrol officer may be limited to 1000 work hours.

Environmental Considerations: This Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Financial Implications:

The recommended amendments to increase liability and safety measures would minimize the City’s potential financial exposure for Shared Mobility Device accidents. It is not possible to forecast specific savings to the City associated with such measures.

While the amendments would not directly change the cost of permit fees and administrative citations issued under SLTCC Chapter 4.185, the amendments allow City Council the discretion to change such costs in the future by resolution thus making program cost recovery more flexible.

Policy Implications:

The proposed amended Ordinance would support Strategic Priority Three: Enhance Public Safety.

The following is provided for future policy guidance.
2025 Year End Summary:

Bird summarized the 2025 season as follows:

Rides in South Lake Tahoe: 52.221
Avg SMD rides per month 8703
Unique Users: 22,872
Avg ride distance: 1.45 miles (annual report)
Use by locals: 28%*
Peak use month: 17,192 in July (33% of all rides)
Lowest use month: 3,245 in October (6% of all rides)
 Using Bird data to extrapolate the number of riders, as they suggest 28% are local riders finds that 14,621 rides of the total were locals. Additionally, Bird explains that

55.9% of those local riders are from Reno zip codes. Removing these 8173 Reno riders from the local total leaves 6448 rides from zip codes around the basin, including Truckee and North Lake Tahoe. Total rides on Bird from users with zip codes in the Basin, 12%. This is the direct comparison of local ridership percentage with Lime, below.
885
Staff Report for City Council Meeting of May 19, 2026 6 of 6 Lime summarized the 2025 season as follows:

Rides in South Lake Tahoe: 124.212
Avg SMD rides per month: 20702
Unique Users: 37,842
Avg ride distance: 1.14 miles (lifetime impact)
Use by locals: 1.3%
Peak use month: 33,853 in July (27% of all rides)
Lowest use month: 8441 in October (6.8% of all rides)
886
Chapter 4.185

SHARED MOBILITY DEVICES
Sections:

4.185.010 Purpose.

4.185.020 Definitions.

4.185.030 Shared bicycles prohibited.

4.185.040 Permit required.

4.185.050 Application for permit.

4.185.060 Issuance of permits.

4.185.070 Fleet limits.

4.185.080 Geofencing and City-designated riding and parking zones.

4.185.090 Operating regulations.

4.185.100 Impoundment and retrieval of shared mobility devices.

4.185.110 Revocation of permit.

4.185.120 Enforcement.

4.185.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to establish a process for permitting and regulating operators and riders of shared mobility devices to achieve the city’s goals of encouraging alternative modes of transportation while protecting public health and safety.

4.185.020 Definitions.

887
“Class II bikeway” means a bike lane which provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.
“Class III bikeway” means a bike route established along a route not served by other classes of bikeways or to connect discontinuous segments of bikeways. Class III bikeways are to be shared with motor vehicles and pedestrians, and shall be designated by signs or permanent markings. “Class IV bikeway” means a bikeway for the exclusive use of bicycles and includes a separation required between the separated bikeway and the through vehicular traffic. The separation may include, but is not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible posts, inflexible barriers, or onstreet parking. “Corral” means an area designated by the chief of police for staging or parking shared mobility devices that is created either by geofencing, or by physical striping, marking or signage.
“Fleet” means all shared mobility devices in the city owned by a specific operator.
“Geofencing” means the creation of a virtual geographic boundary, defined by Global Positioning System (GPS), radio-frequency identification (RFID), or other technology, that enables an operator to regulate speed, issue notifications, and take other actions, when a shared mobility device within its fleet enters or leaves an area.
“Operator” means any individual, firm, association, partnership, or corporation arranging to provide shared mobility devices within the city. “Permit” means a permit issued to an operator under this chapter. “Rider” means any person who is riding or is in actual physical control of a shared mobility device.
“Shared mobility device” means any wheeled transportation device, other than a bicycle, e-bicycle, automobile or motorcycle, by which a person can be propelled, moved or drawn; is accessed via an on-demand portal, whether a smartphone application, membership card, or similar method; is displayed, 888
placed or offered for rent in any public area or public right-of-way by an operator for shared use by members of the public; and is available to members of the public in unstaffed, self-service locations.

4.185.030 Shared bicycles prohibited.

Shared bicycles and shared e-bicycles are prohibited.

4.185.040 Permit required.

It is unlawful for any operator to conduct a shared mobility device business without a permit.

4.185.050 Application for permit.

A. An operator shall submit a permit application to the chief of police containing, at a minimum, the following:

1. The operator’s name and business address, and the name and natural person or persons who will serve as a local point of contact for the operator;

2. Proof of a valid city business and professions certificate;

3. The type and number of shared mobility devices the operator intends to deploy with a list of identifying serial numbers designated for each device, and a schedule for phased deployment of the fleet, if applicable;

4. The location of any building or property proposed to be used by the operator for its shared mobility device business operations within the city; and

5. A $75.00 nonrefundable fee for each shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet for use within the city. If phased deployment of the fleet is proposed, payment for the first phase of deployment is due with the application and payment for any subsequent phases of deployment is due prior to each deployment. The city council may set the fee per resolution.

B. At the time of application, the operator must provide proof of commercial general liability insurance with an admitted insurer, or a nonadmitted insurer that is eligible to insure a home state insured under Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1760) of Part 2 of Division 1 of the Insurance Code, naming the city of South Lake Tahoe as an additional insured for an amount no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property 889
damage, and with an aggregate amount of no less than $54,000,000 for all occurrences during the policy period, and which meets the following requirements:

1. If the operator maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums required for all policies, the city requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the operator. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the city.

2. The operator’s insurance coverage shall be the primary insurance coverage with respect to the city, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the city, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the operator’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. The operator agrees to waive rights of subrogation which any insurer of operator may acquire from operator by virtue of the payment of any loss. The operator agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the city has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

4. The operator shall provide immediate written notice to the city if (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; or (3) the deductible or self-insured retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, the operator shall obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance.

C. The operator must also offer or make available, or confirm the rider maintains, insurance coverage for bodily injury or death suffered by a pedestrian when the injury or death involves, in whole or in part, the negligent conduct of the rider, of $10,000 for each occurrence of bodily injury to, or death of, one pedestrian in any one accident, and for property damage to an assistive technology device, or $1,000 for each occurrence. This paragraph shall not be interpreted to limit or supersede the other insurance requirements set forth pursuant this Section.

D. Each application must bear the operator’s signature agreeing to:
890

1. Provide the city with anonymized data on its fleet trip activity within the city, including the Zip Code of each rider; and

2. Indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the city, its elected and appointed boards, officers, employees, agents, volunteers, contractors, and invitees from any and all liability, for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, and injuries direct or indirect, including any and all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses, in connection therewith, arising from operator’s activities, from and against each and every claim and demand of whatsoever nature made on behalf of or by any person, persons, firm, partnership, corporation or otherwise, including operator’s employees, except for claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the city.

3. Require all riders who operate a shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet within the City to acknowledge a waiver prior to the rider’s initial ride within the City to waive all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, and injuries direct or indirect, including any and all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses in connection therewith, against the City arising from the rider’s operation of a shared mobility device within the City, except for claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

43. Submit to photo enforcement violations of this chapter, including the requirement to effectively prohibit riders under 18 years of age.

4.185.060 Issuance of permits.

A. Each permit shall contain the following:

1. The number and each type of shared mobility devices the operator is authorized to deploy, up to no more than 500 shared mobility devices per operator;

2. A requirement to effectively prohibit shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from entering or operating on the public walkways and public rights-of-way within the Heavenly Village area, withto an extent to be determined by the city managerchief of police, through geofencing or similar technology;

3. A requirement to effectively prohibit, using geofencing or similar technology, any shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from being 891
locked, parked, or ending a ride within any Class I, or Class II, or Class IV bikeway or trail in the city;

4. A requirement to effectively prohibit, using geofencing or similar technology, any shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from being locked, parked, or ending a ride except within a corral if the shared mobility device is within 1,000 feet from a corral; and

5. A requirement that each shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet have affixed to it a designated serial number in Arial Bold, a font size 130and style that may be observed with the naked eye from 50 feet away. This serial number will be of contrasting color to the device and placed on both the left and right side of the SMD upright.

6. A requirement to effectively prohibit riders under 18 years of age. The operator shall annually require each rider to re-scan the rider’s proof of identification card prior to the first instance the rider operates a shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet within the City each calendar year.

B. No permit will be issued prior to the operator obtaining any discretionary and building permits required to occupy any building or property within the city proposed to be used for operations, such as warehouse or office space.

C. Any operator in compliance with this chapter may apply for a permit annually.

4.185.070 Fleet limits.

A. No more than 1,000 shared mobility devices shall be permitted within the city at a time. Once that limit is reached, no more permits will be issued to operators.

B. It is unlawful for an operator to deploy more shared mobility devices than allowed by that operator’s permit.

4.185.080 Geofencing and City-designated riding and parking zones.

A. The chief of police, in consultation with the director of public works, may establish special parking, no-ride zones, speed zones, or other areas where riding and/or parking restrictions may apply. These locations may either be permanent or temporary.
892
B. The chief of police, in consultation with the director of public works, may establish locations of corrals. All corral locations will be published on the city’s website.

C. The chief of police may require that an operator mark or geofence these areas and make that information available through its the operator’s smartphone app.

D. The chief of police may require that operators direct riders to specified designated parking areas (city designated parking zones, or special areas for events). Geofencing must be integrated into the operator’s app within one week of notice from the chief of police.

E. The chief of policeThe city manager, or their designee, may adopt additional rules to implement the provisions of this chapter, including geographic restrictions for shared mobility devices.

4.185.090 Operating regulations.

A. Operators shall comply with the following:

1. Each operator is subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations including those in this code and the California Vehicle Code pertaining to the operation and safety standards of the shared mobility devices in its fleet.

2. Each operator shall limit the motorized-assisted speed of each shared mobility device to no more than 15 miles per hour.

3. Through geofencing or similar technology, each operator shall effectively prohibit riders from entering or operating shared mobility devices on public walkways and public rights-of-way within the Heavenly Village area, as designated in the operator’s permit.

4. Through geofencing or similar technology, each operator shall effectively prohibit, using geofencing or similar technology, any shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from being locked, parked, or ending a ride within any Class I, or Class II, or Class IV bikeway or trail in the city.

5. Through geofencing or similar technology, each operator shall effectively prohibit, using geofencing or similar technology, any shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from being locked, parked, or 893
ending a ride except within a corral if the shared mobility device is within 1,000 feet from a corral.

6. The chief of police may require operators, through geofencing or similar technology, to temporarily prevent the operation of shared mobility devices in a specific area during an emergency situation or within the perimeter of a permitted special event, when necessary to maintain public health and safety. For permitted special events, the city will provide 10 days’ notice to operators of any additional geofencing requirements.

7. When a rider operates a shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet within an area subject to geofencing, the operator shall notify the rider of the restricted area.

8. Each operator must effectively prohibit a person and account holder from renting more than one shared mobility device at a time.

9. Each operator must effectively prohibit riders under 18 years of age.

Operators shall annually require each rider within the city limits to re-scan the rider’s proof of identification card prior to the first instance the rider operates a shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet within the city each calendar year.

10. Operators shall ban the accounts of riders with two or more citations under this chapter.

11. Operators shall remove all shared mobility devices from operation within the city during the period of November 1 through April 30 each year.

12. Operators shall agree to provide rider information from the identified date, time, and serial number that would allow identification of any rider allegedly in violation of specified California Vehicle Codes shown in photographic evidence. This information shall only be used to assist the city in issuing administrative invoice(s) to the rider for violation(s) of South Lake Tahoe City Code.

13. Operators shall inform their riders about special events, operational changes, or scheduled and publicly announced South Lake Tahoe Police Department enforcement actions through the mobile app.
894

14. Operators shall inform their riders that operating shared mobility devices under the influence of drugs or alcohol is against the law.

Engagements shall include a mix of virtual (digital media and inapp communications), physical, and in-person methods. This engagement should consider the needs and concerns of riders as well as non-riders.
b. Operators shall educate riders about safety, riding rules, and etiquette at the time of signup. Messages must include, but are not limited to:
i. Advise to wear helmets when legally required;
ii. Sidewalk riding is prohibited;
iii. Park in appropriate locations including designated corrals;
iv. Riding age restrictions;
v. Ride one person per device;
vi. Obey the rules of the road, and potential penalties; vii. Yielding to pedestrians;
viii. How to report an issue;
ix. Prohibition on riding under the influence.
c. Operators shall educate riders about safety, riding rules and etiquette at the time a rider commences a SMD rental.

16. Digital Outreach and Education.
a. Each rental messaging must be engaging, easy to understand, and require interactive acknowledgement or confirmation by the rider, such as a “rules quiz” or yes or no questions.
b. Operators shall educate customers on how to appropriately park devices at the time of each rental through in-app or audio 895
messaging. Messages should inform riders that improper parking puts others at risk.
c. Operators shall develop systems to review and link riders to violations.
d. Operator’s software and mobile apps shall regularly inform and educate riders when they have ridden into prohibited riding areas such as geofenced areas, public parking facilities, public parks, and sidewalks.
e. Operators shall inform their riders about special events, operational changes, or scheduled and publicly-announced South Lake Tahoe Police Department enforcement actions through the mobile app.
f. Operators shall inform their riders that operating shared mobility devices under the influence of drugs or alcohol is against the law.

17. Physical Outreach and Education.
a. Operators shall regularly deploy ambassadors and/or street teams to inform riders on safety and appropriate device use (including parking). Ambassador teams should be clearly identifiable as operator staff.
b. Operators must conduct at minimum six community events or community/stakeholder safety workshops per year. Operators may host these safety workshops at community events, such as the Live at Lakeview summer concert series.
c. Half (per season) of the community events or
community/stakeholder meetings must be targeted toward
engaging low-income or other disadvantaged community
members. Operators shall conduct outreach in multiple
languages.
896
d. Operators must host at least two learn-to-ride education opportunities per year.
e. Operators shall provide, to the city at fleet deployment, a plan for community outreach and engagement that shall include
ambassador/street teams’ engagement activities and schedules, along with planned presentation, activities, and events with community-based organizations, business improvement districts, and other key stakeholders.
f. Operators shall - on a monthly basis - report information from this outreach to the chief of police to inform problem solving efforts, including, but not limited to, the number of people, time, length, location, and general comments from community members
regarding engagement.

B. Riders shall comply with the following:

1. All riders are subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, those in this code and the California Vehicle Code.

2. All riders must be 18 years of age or older with a valid driver’s license.

All riders shall re-scan their proof of identification card prior to the first instance the rider operates a shared mobility device in an operator’s fleet within the city each calendar year.

3. No rider shall operate a shared mobility device with more than one rider per device at a time.

4. Riders must park shared mobility devices on a sidewalk or other hard surface, in a manner that does not impede pedestrian access and provides a minimum of three feet for a pedestrian walkway; does not impede or obstruct access to ADA parking zones, street furniture, curb ramps, entry ways, driveways, sidewalk cafes, bus stops, loading zones, or landscaping; and does not impede or obstruct vehicular traffic on a street or alley.
897

5. No rider shall lock, park, or end a ride within any Class I or, Class II, or Class IV bikeway or trail in the city.

6. If a rider is within 1,000 feet from a corral, the rider shall only lock, park, or end a ride within a corral.

4.185.100 Impoundment and retrieval of shared mobility devices.

A. Within three hours of notice from the city, an operator shall retrieve a shared mobility device that is in any of the following conditions:

1. Inoperable or not safe to operate and parked on a city street, sidewalk or other city property; or

2. Parked, displayed, offered or made available for rent in violation of this chapter or the California Vehicle Code.

B. The city may impound a shared mobility device that is:

1. Not retrieved within three hours of notice to the operator; or

2. In a condition or parked in a manner that poses an imminent life safety hazard. No notice is required prior to impounding a shared mobility device posing an imminent life safety hazard.

4.185.110 Revocation of permit.

A. The city manager may revoke a permit on any of the following grounds, and shall provide written notice of the reason for the revocation to the operator:

1. The violation by operator of any of the terms, conditions or requirements of the permit or of this chapter.

2. Failure to effectively prohibit riders under the age of 18 from accessing shared mobility devices, which may be established either by multiple administrative citations issued to the operator based on photographic evidence of underage riders, by a city-conducted survey identifying a pattern of underage riders using the operator’s shared mobility devices, or any combination thereof.

B. An operator may appeal the city manager’s decision to revoke or not renew a permit to the city council under the administrative appeal procedures in Chapter 2.35 SLTCC.
898
C. Within 10 business days of the revocation of an operator’s permit, the operator shall remove its fleet from the city and shall retrieve any shared mobility devices impounded by the city. If the operator fails to remove or retrieve any of its shared mobility devices, the city may remove and dispose of the shared mobility device at the operator’s cost.

4.185.120 Enforcement.

A. Any operator or rider violating any provision of this chapter is subject to administrative citations under Chapter 2.30 SLTCC.

B(1). The city may issue an administrative citation with a $100.00 fine to an operator based on photographic, or other, evidence that includes the serial number of an operator’s shared mobility device and demonstrates that a rider is using that shared mobility device in violation of this chapter, including a rider under the age of 18, riders operating a shared mobility device with more than one rider per device at one time, and operating or parking a shared mobility device within a restricted area subject to geofencing requirements.

City Council may set the amount of the fine per resolution.

B(2) The city may issue an administrative citation with a $100.00 fine to rider based on photographic, or other, evidence that includes the serial number of an operator’s shared mobility device, a date and time stamp or other evidence of a date and time, and demonstrates the rider is using that shared mobility device in violation of this chapter. City Council may set the amount of the fine per resolution.

B(3) By incorporation, photo enforcement for rider violations includes only specific California Vehicle Code (CVC) violations on a shared mobility device as enumerated below:
a. CVC 21228(b) (when preparing for a left turn, the rider must dismount);
b. CVC 21235(e) (no passenger allowed).

The above listed violations, when cited, will reference this chapter, section, and subsections of SLTCC, as applicable.

C. Any operator violating, permitting, or assisting the violation of any provisions of this chapter shall be subject to any and all civil remedies, including, without limitation, permit revocation. All remedies provided herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive. Any violation of these provisions shall 899
constitute a separate violation for each and every day during which such violation is committed or continued.

D. In addition to the remedies set forth in this chapter, operating a shared mobility device business in violation of any provision of this chapter is hereby declared to constitute a public nuisance under Chapter 4.40 SLTCC and, as such, may be abated or enjoined from further operation in the city. 900
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 11
Ordinance 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 19, 2026
An Ordinance Amending Chapter 4.185 of the South Lake Tahoe City Code (Shared Mobility Devices) to Increase the City’s Liability Protections and Safety Measures, and Revise Operator Insurance Requirements

FINDINGS
A. On February 11, 2020, City Council adopted Ordinance 2020-1140 (Shared Mobility Devices) adding Chapter 4.185 to the South Lake Tahoe City Code (SLTCC), which established a process for permitting and regulating operators and riders of shared mobility devices to achieve the City’s goals of encouraging alternative modes of transportation while protecting public health and safety.

B. On March 26, 2024, City Council adopted Ordinance 2024-1184 amending SLTCC Chapter

4.185 to add a requirement that shared mobility devices be parked in corrals and adding additional requirements to implement the corrals. These requirements were added to address public safety concerns due to improper parking of shared mobility devices.

C. At the City Council meeting on November 19, 2024, Mayor Pro Tem Wallace requested, and Councilmember Creegan seconded, that an item be brought back to City Council to adopt an ordinance to amend SLTCC Chapter 4.185 to reduce the maximum number of shared mobility devices an operator may deploy in the City.

D. At the City Council meeting on March 11, 2025, City Council considered and declined to adopt an ordinance to further amend Chapter 4.185 which would have caused a 50 percent reduction in shared mobility devices permitted within the City. Instead, City Council directed staff to bring an item back with a presentation of potential options for increasing the City’s liability protections, adding additional safety measures for shared mobility device operations, as well as updating operator insurance requirements.

E. City staff brought the requested item back at the City Council meeting on June 3, 2025 at which time City Council directed staff to incorporate the proposals into an ordinance and bring it back for City Council’s consideration. City staff prepared the requested item and included City Council's direction on increasing the City’s liability protections, adding additional safety measures for shared mobility device operations, as well as updating operator insurance requirements.

F. Staff brought this item back for a first reading of a proposed ordinance on March 10, 2026. At that time, Council declined to adopt the ordinance and instead requested additional amendments related to parking, permissible bikeways, and photo enforcement. The present Ordinance incorporates these requests with the remaining previously proposed amendments. 901
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 11
G. California Vehicle Code section 21225 authorizes cities to regulate the parking and operation of these devices on pedestrian and bicycle facilities and city streets and highways, so long as such regulations are not in conflict with the California Vehicle Code.

Now, Therefore, the City Council of City of South Lake Tahoe does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Chapter 4.185 (Shared Mobility Devices) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

4.185.010 Purpose.

4.185.020 Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms, phrases and words shall have the meanings hereinafter set forth:
“Assistive technology device” means any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of an individual with a disability. “Bikeway” means a facility that is provided primarily for bicycle travel as defined by California Streets and Highways Code section 890.4.
“Class I bikeway” means a bike path or shared use path which provides a completely separated rightof-way designated for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with crossflows by motorists minimized.
“Class II bikeway” means a bike lane which provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. “Class III bikeway” means a bike route established along a route not served by other classes of bikeways or to connect discontinuous segments of bikeways. Class III bikeways are to be shared with motor vehicles and pedestrians, and shall be designated by signs or permanent markings. “Class IV bikeway” means a bikeway for the exclusive use of bicycles and includes a separation required between the separated bikeway and the through vehicular traffic. The separation may include, but is not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible posts, inflexible barriers, or onstreet parking. “Corral” means an area designated by the chief of police for staging or parking shared mobility devices that is created either by geofencing, or by physical striping, marking or signage. “Fleet” means all shared mobility devices in the city owned by a specific operator. “Geofencing” means the creation of a virtual geographic boundary, defined by Global Positioning System (GPS), radio-frequency identification (RFID), or other technology, that enables an operator to 902
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 3 of 11
regulate speed, issue notifications, and take other actions, when a shared mobility device within its fleet enters or leaves an area.
“Operator” means any individual, firm, association, partnership, or corporation arranging to provide shared mobility devices within the city.
“Permit” means a permit issued to an operator under this chapter. “Rider” means any person who is riding or is in actual physical control of a shared mobility device. “Shared mobility device” means any wheeled transportation device, other than a bicycle, e-bicycle, automobile or motorcycle, by which a person can be propelled, moved or drawn; is accessed via an on-demand portal, whether a smartphone application, membership card, or similar method; is displayed, placed or offered for rent in any public area or public right-of-way by an operator for shared use by members of the public; and is available to members of the public in unstaffed, self-service locations.

4.185.030 Shared bicycles prohibited.

Shared bicycles and shared e-bicycles are prohibited.

4.185.040 Permit required.

It is unlawful for any operator to conduct a shared mobility device business without a permit.

4.185.050 Application for permit.

A. An operator shall submit a permit application to the chief of police containing, at a minimum, the following:

1. The operator’s name and business address, and the name and natural person or persons who will serve as a local point of contact for the operator;

2. Proof of a valid city business and professions certificate;

4. The location of any building or property proposed to be used by the operator for its shared mobility device business operations within the city; and

5. A nonrefundable fee for each shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet for use within the city. If phased deployment of the fleet is proposed, payment for the first phase of deployment is due with the application and payment for any subsequent phases of deployment is due prior to each deployment. The city council may set the fee per resolution.

B. At the time of application, the operator must provide proof of commercial general liability insurance with an admitted insurer, or a nonadmitted insurer that is eligible to insure a home state insured under Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1760) of Part 2 of Division 1 of the Insurance Code, naming the city of South Lake Tahoe as an additional insured for an amount no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, and with an aggregate amount of 903
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 4 of 11
no less than $5,000,000 for all occurrences during the policy period, and which meets the following requirements:

D. Each application must bear the operator’s signature agreeing to:

1. Provide the city with anonymized data on its fleet trip activity within the city, including the Zip Code of each rider; and

3. Require all riders who operate a shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet within the City to acknowledge a waiver prior to the rider’s initial ride within the City to waive all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, and injuries direct or indirect, including any and all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses in connection therewith, against the City arising from the rider’s operation of 904
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 5 of 11
a shared mobility device within the City, except for claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

4. Submit to photo enforcement violations of this chapter, including the requirement to effectively prohibit riders under 18 years of age.

4.185.060 Issuance of permits.

A. Each permit shall contain the following:

1. The number and each type of shared mobility devices the operator is authorized to deploy, up to no more than 500 shared mobility devices per operator;

2. A requirement to effectively prohibit shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from entering or operating on the public walkways and public rights-of-way within the Heavenly Village area, to an extent to be determined by the chief of police, through geofencing or similar technology;

3. A requirement to effectively prohibit, using geofencing or similar technology, any shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from being locked, parked, or ending a ride within any Class I, Class II, or Class IV bikeway or trail in the city;

5. A requirement that each shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet have affixed to it a designated serial number in Arial Bold, font size 130. This serial number will be of contrasting color to the device and placed on both the left and right side of the SMD upright.

C. Any operator in compliance with this chapter may apply for a permit annually.

4.185.070 Fleet limits.

A. No more than 1,000 shared mobility devices shall be permitted within the city at a time. Once that limit is reached, no more permits will be issued to operators.

B. It is unlawful for an operator to deploy more shared mobility devices than allowed by that operator’s permit.

4.185.080 Geofencing and City-designated riding and parking zones.

A. The chief of police, in consultation with the director of public works, may establish special parking, no-ride zones, speed zones, or other areas where riding and/or parking restrictions may apply. These locations may either be permanent or temporary.
905
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 6 of 11
B. The chief of police, in consultation with the director of public works, may establish locations of corrals. All corral locations will be published on the city’s website.

C. The chief of police may require that an operator mark or geofence these areas and make that information available through the operator’s smartphone app.

E. The chief of police may adopt additional rules to implement the provisions of this chapter, including geographic restrictions for shared mobility devices.

4.185.090 Operating regulations.

A. Operators shall comply with the following:

2. Each operator shall limit the motorized-assisted speed of each shared mobility device to no more than 15 miles per hour.

4. Through geofencing or similar technology, each operator shall effectively prohibit, using geofencing or similar technology, any shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from being locked, parked, or ending a ride within any Class I, Class II, or Class IV bikeway or trail in the city.

5. Through geofencing or similar technology, each operator shall effectively prohibit, using geofencing or similar technology, any shared mobility devices in the operator’s fleet from being locked, parked, or ending a ride except within a corral if the shared mobility device is within 1,000 feet from a corral.

7. When a rider operates a shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet within an area subject to geofencing, the operator shall notify the rider of the restricted area.

8. Each operator must effectively prohibit a person and account holder from renting more than one shared mobility device at a time.

9. Each operator must effectively prohibit riders under 18 years of age. Operators shall annually require each rider within the city limits to re-scan the rider’s proof of identification card prior to 906
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 7 of 11
the first instance the rider operates a shared mobility device in the operator’s fleet within the city each calendar year.

10. Operators shall ban the accounts of riders with two or more citations under this chapter.

11. Operators shall remove all shared mobility devices from operation within the city during the period of November 1 through April 30 each year.

13. Operators shall inform their riders about special events, operational changes, or scheduled and publicly announced South Lake Tahoe Police Department enforcement actions through the mobile app.

14. Operators shall inform their riders that operating shared mobility devices under the influence of drugs or alcohol is against the law.

15. Engagement, Outreach, and Education.
a. Operators shall provide a parking and safety education plan as part of their permit application. Operators shall engage with riders to protect the safety of customers and all roadway users. Engagements shall include a mix of virtual (digital media and in-app communications), physical, and in-person methods. This engagement should consider the needs and concerns of riders as well as non-riders. b. Operators shall educate riders about safety, riding rules, and etiquette at the time of signup. Messages must include, but are not limited to:
i. Advise to wear helmets when legally required;
ii. Sidewalk riding is prohibited;
iii. Park in appropriate locations including designated corrals; iv. Riding age restrictions;
v. Ride one person per device;
vi. Obey the rules of the road, and potential penalties; vii. Yielding to pedestrians;
viii. How to report an issue;
ix. Prohibition on riding under the influence.
c. Operators shall educate riders about safety, riding rules and etiquette at the time a rider commences a SMD rental.

16. Digital Outreach and Education.
a. Each rental messaging must be engaging, easy to understand, and require interactive acknowledgement or confirmation by the rider, such as a “rules quiz” or yes or no questions.
907
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 8 of 11
b. Operators shall educate customers on how to appropriately park devices at the time of each rental through in-app or audio messaging. Messages should inform riders that improper parking puts others at risk.
c. Operators shall develop systems to review and link riders to violations. d. Operator’s software and mobile apps shall regularly inform and educate riders when they have ridden into prohibited riding areas such as geofenced areas, public parking facilities, public parks, and sidewalks.
e. Operators shall inform their riders about special events, operational changes, or scheduled and publicly-announced South Lake Tahoe Police Department enforcement actions through the mobile app.
f. Operators shall inform their riders that operating shared mobility devices under the influence of drugs or alcohol is against the law.

Operators shall conduct outreach in multiple languages. d. Operators must host at least two learn-to-ride education opportunities per year. e. Operators shall provide, to the city at fleet deployment, a plan for community outreach and engagement that shall include ambassador/street teams’ engagement activities and schedules, along with planned presentation, activities, and events with communitybased organizations, business improvement districts, and other key stakeholders. f. Operators shall - on a monthly basis - report information from this outreach to the chief of police to inform problem solving efforts, including, but not limited to, the number of people, time, length, location, and general comments from community members regarding engagement.

B. Riders shall comply with the following:

1. All riders are subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, those in this code and the California Vehicle Code.

2. All riders must be 18 years of age or older with a valid driver’s license. All riders shall re-scan their proof of identification card prior to the first instance the rider operates a shared mobility device in an operator’s fleet within the city each calendar year. 908
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 9 of 11

3. No rider shall operate a shared mobility device with more than one rider per device at a time.

5. No rider shall lock, park, or end a ride within any Class I, Class II, or Class IV bikeway or trail in the city.

6. If a rider is within 1,000 feet from a corral, the rider shall only lock, park, or end a ride within a corral.

4.185.100 Impoundment and retrieval of shared mobility devices.

A. Within three hours of notice from the city, an operator shall retrieve a shared mobility device that is in any of the following conditions:

1. Inoperable or not safe to operate and parked on a city street, sidewalk or other city property; or

2. Parked, displayed, offered or made available for rent in violation of this chapter or the California Vehicle Code.

B. The city may impound a shared mobility device that is:

1. Not retrieved within three hours of notice to the operator; or

2. In a condition or parked in a manner that poses an imminent life safety hazard. No notice is required prior to impounding a shared mobility device posing an imminent life safety hazard.

4.185.110 Revocation of permit.

A. The city manager may revoke a permit on any of the following grounds, and shall provide written notice of the reason for the revocation to the operator:

1. The violation by operator of any of the terms, conditions or requirements of the permit or of this chapter.

B. An operator may appeal the city manager’s decision to revoke or not renew a permit to the city council under the administrative appeal procedures in Chapter 2.35 SLTCC.

C. Within 10 business days of the revocation of an operator’s permit, the operator shall remove its fleet from the city and shall retrieve any shared mobility devices impounded by the city. If the operator 909
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 10 of 11
fails to remove or retrieve any of its shared mobility devices, the city may remove and dispose of the shared mobility device at the operator’s cost.

4.185.120 Enforcement.

A. Any operator or rider violating any provision of this chapter is subject to administrative citations under Chapter 2.30 SLTCC.

B(1) The city may issue an administrative citation with a fine to an operator based on photographic, or other, evidence that includes the serial number of an operator’s shared mobility device and demonstrates that a rider is using that shared mobility device in violation of this chapter. City Council may set the amount of the fine per resolution.

B(2) The city may issue an administrative citation with a fine to rider based on photographic, or other, evidence that includes the serial number of an operator’s shared mobility device, a date and time stamp or other evidence of a date and time, and demonstrates the rider is using that shared mobility device in violation of this chapter. City Council may set the amount of the fine per resolution.

The above listed violations, when cited, will reference this chapter, section, and subsections of SLTCC, as applicable.

C. Any operator violating, permitting, or assisting the violation of any provisions of this chapter shall be subject to any and all civil remedies, including, without limitation, permit revocation. All remedies provided herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive. Any violation of these provisions shall constitute a separate violation for each and every day during which such violation is committed or continued.

SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is directed to certify this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
910
Ordinance 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 11 of 11
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days following its adoption.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 19, 2026 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Abstain:

Absent:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
First Reading:

Published:

Second Reading:

Effective:

The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
911
SMD Ordinance First Reading - Page 2 of 2
912
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Agenda Item #:9
Agenda Item: Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club City Sponsorship
Executive Summary: The Parks & Recreation Department received a request from the Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club (Swim Club) to support the costs associated with the rental of the pool for their program.

Historically, the Swim Club received a discount of 55% on the rental plus the costs associated with staffing one of the two lifeguards necessary for their rental. These historic discounts have not been memorialized in an agreement and the Swim Club requested these costs be covered by the City at the new Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center (Rec Center). Without these discounts, the Swim Club has expressed challenges to retaining participation levels in the program. Staff recommend Council support the costs associated for staffing one of the lifeguards along with increasing the discount to the Swim Club to 55% for their rental of the pool to support the Swim Club program for a six-month rental.

The total cost of the City sponsoring these costs is $8,343 from the General Fund. This will support a valued long-term rental while recognizing and accounting for the cost of using City facilities and associated labor. Staff propose a broad review of fees for the new Rec Center be brought back to Council at a future date to evaluate fees for the Swim Club in the context of all other recreation renters and users.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing the use of General Fund to sponsor facility rental fees and staff labor for the Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club totaling $8,343 for a sixmonth agreement.

Responsible Staff Member: John Stark, Director of Parks & Recreation Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club City Sponorship.docx 02-Resolution-Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club City Sponsorship.docx 913
Council Agenda Report- May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Title: Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club City Sponsorship
Location: Multigenerational Recreation & Aquatics Center Responsible Staff Member: John Stark, Parks and Recreation Director (530) 307-9145 Background: Approximately six months ago, Parks & Recreation staff met with members of the Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club Board to discuss the new fee schedule for the new Recreation & Aquatics Center. It was discussed that the prior fee arrangement the Swim Club had was not part of a formal City Council-approved agreement or adopted fee structure. The historical discount and City-covered lifeguard support were not memorialized in a written agreement approved by the City Council and therefore could not be continued administratively at the new facility. At that time, staff advised the Swim Club that if the organization believed it could not operate under the new fee structure, it could submit financial information and supporting documentation to staff and staff could review and prepare an item requesting the City sponsoring the Swim Club program. Staff do not have authority to approve subsidized facility use, waive adopted fees, or provide City-funded staffing outside the approved fee structure. Any such request would require City Council review and approval.

The Parks and Recreation Department received a request in April 2026 from the Swim Club to support the costs associated with the rental of the pool for their program. The Swim Club has expressed financial challenges with the fees they would pay with the existing fee schedule that would challenge the viability of their program.

Without the fee and staff sponsorship, the Swim Club has expressed challenges to retaining participation levels in the program.

Issue and Discussion:

Staff recommend Council support the costs associated for staffing one of the lifeguards along with increasing the discount to the Swim Club to 55% for their rental of the pool to support the Swim Club program for a six-month rental agreement. City Council authorization is required to allow the Parks and Recreation Department to apply General Fund support toward the facility rental costs and staffing of one lifeguard to support sponsoring the Swim Club rental. This approach enables the City to support a valued long-term rental while still recognizing and accounting for the cost of using City facilities and labor totaling $8,343 sponsored by the City. 914
Council Agenda Report- May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Staff propose continuing to evaluate the fees for the Swim Club in the context of all other recreation renters and users for a broader review of the fees to be brought back to City Council at a future date.

Financial Implications: Rental fees for the pool with the 25% nonprofit discount and full cost of paying for two lifeguards total $18,750.96 for six months. Changing the discount from the nonprofit rate to the 55% discount and covering the cost of one lifeguard would reduce these fees to $10,407.96 and would be subsidized for the Swim Club from the General Fund. The Swim Club will pay $10,407.96 total including the cost of one lifeguard and pool rental for their rental for the six-month agreement.

Environmental Considerations: The Swim Club sponsorship is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the program will allow for the normal operations of existing facilities for public gatherings for which the facilities were designed (CEQA Guidelines section 15323 – Normal Operations of Facilities for Public Gatherings).

Policy Implications: Strategic Plan Priorities supported by sponsoring the Swim Club include:

7.7 Continue to improve access for people of all abilities to all public spaces. 915
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 19, 2026
Authorizing the Use of General Fund to Sponsor Facility Rental Fees and Staff Labor at the Recreation Center for the Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club

BACKGROUND
A. The City’s Parks and Recreation Department (City) received a request from the Tahoe Bluefins Swim Club (Swim Club) to support the costs associated with the rental of the pool for their program.

B. Historically, the Swim Club received a discount of 55% along with supporting the costs associated with staffing one of the two lifeguards for their rental. This has not been memorialized in an agreement previously.

C. The Swim Club has expressed financial challenges with the fees they would pay with the existing fee schedule that would challenge the viability of their program.

D. Without the fee and staff sponsorship, the Swim Club has expressed challenges to retaining participation levels in the program.

E. Staff recommend Council support the costs associated for staffing one of the lifeguards along with increasing the discount to the Swim Club to 55% for their rental of the pool to support the Swim Club program for a six-month rental agreement.

F. City Council authorization is required to allow the Parks and Recreation Department to apply General Fund support toward the facility rental costs and staffing of one lifeguard to support sponsoring the Swim Club rental. This approach enables the City to support a valued longterm rental while still recognizing and accounting for the cost of using City facilities and labor totaling $8,343 sponsored by the City.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorizes the Use of General Fund to sponsor facility rental fees and staff labor for the Swim Club totaling $8,343 for a six-month agreement.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 19, 2026, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Cody Bass, Mayor
Attest:
916
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 2
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
917
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Agenda Item #:10
Agenda Item: Amendment to Parking Agreement with Heavenly Mountain Resort Executive Summary: On 3/10/26, the city council asked for a report on usage of the Heavenly Parking Agreement. They additionally asked for information on potential safety concerns arising out of the agreement. After conducting this assessment, two areas of concern were found which can be addressed by amending the agreement. One safety concern was found arising from citizen complaints. The concerns came from residents of 1390 Ski Run Blvd. The complainants noted the parked vehicles created a substantial visual obstruction when exiting their complex. One complainant mentioned nearly getting in a traffic collision due to this obstruction. They also noted the impact was greater with snow buildup on the roadway. This location on Ski Run Blvd, located between Needle Peak Rd and Regina Rd, has residences on the west side of the roadway. The east side of the roadway has no residences.

This would make it an ideal place to relocate the on-street parking to eliminate the visual safety issue and reduce resident/visitor conflicts. The second safety concern arose from a heavy snow day which led the PD to close Ski Run Blvd and Keller Rd due to dangerous road conditions. When the roadways are not closed in these conditions, multiple vehicle collisions occur. Under section 3 of the existing agreement, Heavenly has been designated to plow, de-ice, and sand the roadways used by them for onstreet parking on days they are used. These requirements state Heavenly â€œshall ensure that travel lanes to accommodate two-way traffic are maintained in these areas whenever they are used for resort parking.â€ Heavenly might view this obligation as an absolute requirement despite dangerous road conditions and encourage employees to make it to work in order to carry out this function. The safety of motorists and pedestrians supersede Heavenlyâ€™s need to fulfil its obligations on days which the PD closes Ski Run Blvd and Keller Rd. Heavenly employees already on site can still perform these functions, but we donâ€™t want other employees not already at work encouraged to come up the closed roads.

Amending section 3, paragraph 1 of the agreement to add guidance regarding roadway closure operations would clarify Heavenlyâ€™s obligations and promote roadway safety.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: 1) Pass a Motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute the Amendment to the Parking Agreement with Heavenly Mountain Resort; and 2) Pass a Resolution amending the seasonal parking restrictions on certain streets in the Heavenly Valley Neighborhood (replaces Resolution 2025-099).

Responsible Staff Member: Lt. Doug Sentell
Reviewed and Approved By: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01 STAFF REPORT - Heavenly Parking Agreement Report.docx 02-Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with Heavenly.docx
03- Resolution on Seasonal Parking Agreement.docx
04-C-306-2025 Heavenly Parking Agreement.pdf
05- ExhibitA.pdf
918
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Title: Evaluation of the Heavenly Valley Parking Agreement for the 2025/2026 Ski Season.

Location: Police Department
Responsible Staff Member: Lieutenant Doug Sentell, (530) 542-6520 Background:

The city entered into the Heavenly Valley Parking agreement with Heavenly Mountain Resort (Heavenly) for use of city street parking during the ski season for overflow parking. The agreement, Motion 2025-128 / C-306-2025, was agreed to by the city council on 12/09/2025.

Issue and Discussion:

During the agenda planning calendar discussion of the March 10, 2026 city council meeting, Council Member Horgan requested an assessment of this agreement, which Council Member Jinkens seconded.

The information requested was for the following:

1. End of season report of on-street parking usage from Heavenly

2. Parking enforcement by the PD

3. Safety concerns, if any, arising from the on-street parking Note: The 2025/2026 ski season was affected by low snowfall totals. This likely had an effect on the results of this assessment.

Findings:

1. Heavenly reported parking 2,542 cars on the street over 39 separate days. They averaged 65 cars a day for each of these days

2. The PD issued 56 citations in the on-street parking area from 11/01/25 through 3/22/26. This placed the average at only 1.4 citations per usage day.

3. One safety concern was found arising from citizen complaints. The concerns came from residents of 1390 Ski Run Blvd. The complainants noted the parked vehicles created a substantial visual obstruction when exiting their complex. One complainant mentioned nearly getting in a traffic collision due to this obstruction. They also noted the impact was greater with snow buildup on the roadway
This location on Ski Run Blvd, located between Needle Peak Rd and Regina Rd, has residences on the west side of the roadway. The east side of the roadway has no residences. This would make it an ideal place to relocate the on-street parking to eliminate the visual safety issue and reduce resident/visitor conflicts.

An additional safety concern arose from a heavy snow day which led the PD to close Ski Run Blvd and Keller Rd due to dangerous road conditions. When the roadways are not closed in these conditions, multiple vehicle collisions occur.
919
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Under section 3 of the existing agreement, Heavenly has been designated to plow and sand the roadways used by them for on-street parking on days they are used. These requirements state Heavenly “shall ensure that travel lanes to accommodate two-way traffic are maintained in these areas whenever they are used for resort parking.”
Heavenly might view this obligation as an absolute requirement despite dangerous road conditions and encourage employees to make it to work in order to carry out this function. The PD views the safety of motorists and pedestrians supersede Heavenly’s need to fulfil its obligations on days which the PD closes Ski Run Blvd and Keller Rd. Heavenly employees already on site can still perform these functions, but we don’t want other employees not already at work encouraged to come up the closed roads.

Amending section 3, paragraph 1 of the agreement to add guidance regarding roadway closure operations would clarify Heavenly’s obligations and promote roadway safety.

Recommendations:

Based on analysis of the parking location, input from complainants, and a meeting with Heavenly Director of Base Experience Brian Bigley, I recommend the following:

Amend section 2A of the Heavenly Parking Agreement (C-306-2025) as follows:

Perpendicular parking spaces on the west east side of Ski Run Boulevard between Needle Peak Road and Regina Road, as shown on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Heavenly shall maintain visible markings and make best efforts to prohibit parking within 15 feet of a fire hydrant.

Amend section 3, paragraph one of the Heavenly Parking Agreement (C-306-2025) as follows:

In order to assist the City with timely snow removal and application of deicer and abrasives on the streets that are covered by this Agreement, snow removal, sanding, and deicing will be primarily performed by Heavenly, using its own equipment, on the roads where non-exclusive use of onstreet parking is granted to Heavenly, specified in Section 2, whenever these areas are used for resort parking. Heavenly shall ensure that travel lanes to accommodate two-way traffic are maintained in these areas whenever they are used for resort parking. During periods of severe weather which the Police Department closes Ski Run Blvd and/or Keller Road, Heavenly will not be penalized for an inability to perform these duties in a timely manner due to road closure. Heavenly understands when conditions cause the roadways to be closed, it can impact its operations.

Financial Implications:

There will be no impact to the general fund.

Environmental Considerations: The proposed action is not a “project” subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) (creation of government funding mechanisms or government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment).

Policy Implications: N/A
920
City of South Lake Tahoe
Amendment to Heavenly Valley Parking Agreement C-306-2025 AMENDMENT No. 1 TO THE PARKING AGREEMENT WITH

HEAVENLY MOUNTAIN RESORT
The Parking Agreement, C-306-2025, entered on December 9, 2025, between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation ("CITY") and Heavenly Mountain Resort (“Heavenly") is hereby amended as set forth below.

RECITALS
A. On December 9, 2025, the City entered into the agreement with Heavenly which allowed them to use certain designated on-street parking locations for their operations. The agreement also tasked Heavenly with “snow removal, sanding, and deicing” as their primary responsibility in the areas which they park their cars pursuant to this agreement.

B. During the agenda planning calendar discussion on the March 10, 2026 city council meeting, Council Member Horgan requested an assessment of this agreement, which Council Member Jinkens seconded.

C. I, Lt, Doug Sentell, gathered the information regarding the assessment. The findings are attached in the staff report.

D. A safety issue was found which needed to be addressed regarding parking on Ski Run Blvd. between Needle Peak Rd and Regina Rd. Residents in this section reported visual obscurement due to the vehicles parked on its (west) side of the roadway. They reported near-miss collisions.

E. An assessment of the area showed no residences on the opposite (east) side of Ski Run Blvd. Moving the parking to the opposite side of the roadway would remove the visual obscurement to the residences on the west side of the roadway.

F. An assessment of operations during roadway closures found the need to amend the agreement to give clarification to Heavenly on expectations of duties during events which close Ski Run Blvd. and Keller Road.

AGREEMENT
Section 2(A) of the Heavenly Valley Parking Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Perpendicular parking spaces on the east side of Ski Run Boulevard between Needle Peak Road and Regina Road, as shown on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Heavenly shall maintain visible markings and make best efforts to prohibit parking within 15 feet of a fire hydrant.

Section 3, paragraph 1 of the Heavenly Valley Parking Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

In order to assist the City with timely snow removal and application of deicer and abrasives on the streets that are covered by this Agreement, snow removal, sanding, and deicing will 921
City of South Lake Tahoe
Amendment to Heavenly Valley Parking Agreement C-306-2025 be primarily performed by Heavenly, using its own equipment, on the roads where nonexclusive use of onstreet parking is granted to Heavenly, specified in Section 2, whenever these areas are used for resort parking. Heavenly shall ensure that travel lanes to accommodate two-way traffic are maintained in these areas whenever they are used for resort parking. During periods of severe weather which the Police Department closes Ski Run Blvd and/or Keller Road, Heavenly will not be penalized for an inability to perform these duties in a timely manner due to road closure. Heavenly understands when conditions cause the roadways to be closed, it can impact its operations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HEAVENLY VALLEY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP
By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor Shaydar Edelmann, VP & General
Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_____________________________ __________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney Susan Blankenship, City Clerk CITY SEAL:
922
Heavenly Parking Area
Ski Run Blvd
Needle Peak Rd
Wildwood Ave
Saddle Rd
Keller Rd
Sherman Way
Keller Rd
Ski Run Blvd
Regina Rd
Perpendicular Parking
Parallel Parking
Parallel Parking
Parallel Parking
Parallel Parking
Heavenly Parking Agreement
2026
Exhibit A
Path: \\gis\share\Projects\CityManager\GeneralCityManagerProjects\GeneralCityManagerProjects.aprx | Heavenly Parking Agreement 2026 Exhibit A | 5/13/2026 0 500 1,000 1,500
Feet
923
Resolution 2026-
XXX
May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 4
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 19, 2026
Establishing Seasonal or Permanent No Parking Restrictions on Certain Streets in the Heavenly Valley Neighborhoods
(Replaces Resolution 2025-099)

BACKGROUND
A. As part of the ongoing effort to improve parking and traffic conditions in the Heavenly Valley neighborhoods, especially during winter conditions and the Heavenly ski season, the Public Works Director/City Traffic Engineer recommends establishing certain residential streets as no parking areas or Residential Parking Permit (RPP) from November 1 to May 1.

B. Under South Lake Tahoe City Code section 4.25.300(C) and California Vehicle Code section 22507(a), the City Council is authorized to establish no parking areas by resolution and enforce the no parking areas once appropriate signage is installed.

C. On September 15, 2023, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2023-1178 to authorize residential permit parking under California Vehicle Code section 22507(a), which the Public Works Director has determined is appropriate for this area because non-resident vehicles do substantially and regularly interfere with the use of the majority of the available on-street spaces by adjacent residents; this interference occurs at regular and significant daily or weekly intervals; the volume of non-resident vehicles in these certain areas cause unreasonable traffic hazards, noise, and trash impacts; a shortage of reasonably available and convenient residential related parking spaces exist in these areas; and alternative solutions are not feasible or practical.

D. On August 8, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023-074, establishing No Parking and Residential Parking Permits on Certain Roadways in Heavenly Valley Neighborhood. The resolution has most recently been amended with adoption of Resolution 2024-059.

E. As a result of City Council approval of a Parking Agreement with Heavenly Resort, modifications on Saddle Road, Keller Road, and Ski Run Blvd, Resolution 2025-099 was adopted on December 9, 2025 to replace Resolution No. 2024-059. 924
Resolution 2026-
XXX
May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 4
F. After evaluation of the 2025/2026 season, additional modifications are needed to improve public safety. Modifications are underlined,.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

Establishes no parking areas from November 1 to May 1, or maintains permanent no parking areas where such areas already exist, with Residential Permit Parking permitted where noted, on the following streets and segments of streets and as shown in Exhibit A:
a. Bridle Road (RPP on the northerly side and No Parking on southerly side) b. Bonita Road (No Parking on the northerly side and RPP on the southerly side) c. David Lane from the intersection of Ski Run Blvd to Ruby Way (No Parking on the easterly side and RPP on the westerly side)
d. Donner Lane (RPP on the westerly side and No Parking on the easterly side) e. Keller Road from intersection with Sherman Way to intersection with Saddle Road at the CA Base Parking Lot (RPP from Sherman Way intersection to 1,500 feet to the south on the western side and No Parking on the south and eastern side) f. Keller Road from intersection with Saddle Road to intersection with Regina (RPP on northerly side (450 feet west of Saddle) and No Parking on southerly side between the two driveways of 1474 Keller Road
g. Keller Road from intersection with Regina Road to intersection with Markoffer Way (No Parking both sides) and from the intersection with Sherman Way to the intersection with Saddle Road (No Parking on the easterly side and RPP on the westerly side)
h. Knoll Lane (RPP on easterly side and No Parking on westerly side) i. Logroad Place (No Parking both sides)
j. Lucinda Court (RPP on westerly side and No Parking on easterly side) k. June Way (No Parking both sides)
I. MacKedie Way (No Parking both sides)
m. Needle Peak Road from intersection with Keller Road to intersection with Wildwood Avenue (RPP on southerly side and No Parking on northerly side) n. Overlook Court (No Parking both sides)
o. Regina Road from the intersection with Ski Run Blvd to Keller Road (RPP on the easterly side and No Parking on the westerly side)
925
Resolution 2026-
XXX
May 19, 2026 Page 3 of 4
p. Saddle Road from the intersection of Ledge Ct. to the intersection of Saddle Road to the south (RPP on western side, No Parking on eastern side) q. Saddle Road from the intersection of Saddle Road to intersection of Keller Road to the south (No Parking on both sides)
r. Saddle Road from the intersection of Keller Rd to Ledge Court (No Parking on eastern side) s. Saddle Road from intersection of Keller Road to Wildwood Avenue (No Parking both sides)
t. Saddle Road from intersection of Wildwood Avenue to Ski Run Blvd (No Parking on northerly side)
u.Saddle Road from intersection of Ski Run Blvd to end (No Parking both sides) v. Sherman Way (RPP on westerly side and No Parking on eastern side and around the cul-de-sac)
w. Ski Run Boulevard from intersection of Pioneer Trail to Saddle Road (No Parking both sides except on western eastern side between Needle Peak and Regina). x. Needle Peak Road from intersection of Ski Run to Wildwood (No Parking on both sides)
y. Needle Peak Road from intersection of Ski Run to 500 feet west of Ski Run Blvd (No Parking on both sides)
z. Timber Lake Place (No Parking both sides)
aa. Terrace Drive (No Parking both sides)
bb. Wildwood Avenue from intersection with Saddle Road to intersection with Overlook Court (No Parking both sides)
cc. Wildwood Road (No Parking both sides)
dd. Woods Avenue (No Parking both sides)
ee. Verdon Lane (RPP on the westerly side and No Parking on the easterly side) Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 19, 2026, by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:
926
________________________ _______________________
,Mayor Date
Attest:
________________________ ________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Date
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
927
Exhibit A
928
1 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE – HEAVENLY

PARKING AGREEMENT
This City of South Lake Tahoe – Heavenly Parking Agreement ( this “ Agreement”) is entered into and effective as of the 9th day of December 2025 ( the “ Effective Date”) by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“ City”), and Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership, a Nevada Limited Partnership, d/b/a/ Heavenly Mountain Resort Heavenly”). The City and Heavenly are sometimes referred to herein individually as a “ Party” or collectively as the “ Parties.”

RECITALS
A. Heavenly is the operator of Heavenly Mountain Resort ( the “ Resort”); and B. Heavenly desires to utilize portions of existing City streets where adequate area exists for limited on-street parking during peak visitor days, and the City desires to allow Heavenly to use these areas.

AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals, the mutual covenants set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Term. This Agreement shall continue from year to year from the Effective Date, unless terminated as provided herein. The Agreement may be terminated as follows:

The City and Heavenly shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, with or without cause, by providing ninety ( 90) days’ prior written notice of termination to the other Party; provided, however, the right to submit such notice of termination shall be limited to the following time period: February 1 through and including June 1 of each calendar year the Agreement is in effect.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Agreement may be terminated, with or without cause, at any time by written mutual agreement of both parties.

2. Locations of On-Street Parking. Heavenly agrees to pay the City by January 31 of each year for the current ski season, a flat fee of $45,000 ( the “ Parking Fee”) for the non-exclusive use of the following locations for on-street parking. The Parking Fee will increase each year by 4%. Heavenly shall not charge for use of this public on-street parking. Heavenly staff will manage on-street parking and use its best efforts to communicate to the City’ s South Tahoe Police Department its intent to utilize on-street parking.

A. Perpendicular parking spaces on the west side of Ski Run Boulevard between Needle Peak Road and Regina Road, as shown on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Heavenly shall maintain visible markings and make best efforts to prohibit parking within 15 feet of a fire hydrant. 929
2 B. Parallel parking spaces on the south side of Saddle Road between 20 feet west of Wildwood Avenue and the driveway to 3669 Saddle Road, as shown on Exhibit A.

Heavenly shall staff and manage parking in this area to direct drivers to turn around and legally park while avoiding use of steeper portions of Saddle Road and Ski Run Blvd for circulation. Driveways and intersections may not be used for vehicle Uturns. Heavenly shall maintain visible markings and make best efforts to prohibit parking within 15 feet of a fire hydrant.

C. Parallel parking spaces on the west and north sides of Keller Road between Saddle Road and 1,500 feet to the south of the intersection with Sherman Way, as shown on Exhibit A. Heavenly shall staff and manage parking in this area to direct drivers to turn around and legally park while avoiding use of steeper portions of Keller Way.

Driveways and intersections may not be used for vehicle U-turns. Heavenly shall maintain visible markings and make best efforts to prohibit parking within 15 feet of a fire hydrant.

D. Parallel parking spaces on the west side of Keller Road between Regina Road and the northern driveway to 1474 Keller Road and between the southern driveway to 1474 Keller Road and Saddle Road. Heavenly shall staff and manage parking in this area to direct drivers to turn around and legally park while avoiding use of steeper portions of Keller Road for circulation. Driveways and intersections may not be used for vehicle U-turns. Heavenly shall maintain visible markings and make best efforts to prohibit parking within 15 feet of a fire hydrant.

3. Snow Removal and Application of Deicer and Abrasives on City Streets. In order to assist the City with timely snow removal and application of deicer and abrasives on the streets that are covered by this Agreement, snow removal, sanding, and deicing will be primarily performed by Heavenly, using its own equipment, on the roads where non-exclusive use of onstreet parking is granted to Heavenly, specified in Section 2, whenever these areas are used for resort parking. Heavenly shall ensure that travel lanes to accommodate two-way traffic are maintained in these areas whenever they are used for resort parking.

These snow removal, deicer and abrasives responsibilities are in addition to, and do not supersede, obligations of Heavenly and the City agreed to in the “ City of South Lake TahoeHeavenly Snow Removal Agreement” dated June 17, 2025 ( C-117-2025) or as amended in the future.

Heavenly shall use its best efforts to communicate its intent to remove snow and apply deicer and abrasives. Heavenly and the City’ s South Tahoe Police Department representatives will meet every two weeks when Heavenly is in winter operations to discuss on-street parking plans, collaborative preparation for storm cycles and peak visitation periods, and potential traffic control. Special meetings may also be requested by any of the aforementioned stakeholders to coordinate preparations for storm events or peak visitation periods.

A. Heavenly shall reimburse the City for the cost of any road repair work required as a result of damage caused by Heavenly’ s negligent use of its snow removal or deicer equipment within thirty ( 30) days from Heavenly’ s receipt of the undisputed invoice from the City showing repairs performed and monies due. 930
3 In the event of dispute over the nature of the charges or the reasonableness of the cost of the repair work invoiced, the dispute shall be submitted to the City Council of South Lake Tahoe for resolution. The decision of the City Council shall be final and binding on all Parties.

4. Other Heavenly Obligations.

A. Heavenly shall provide sufficient personnel to manage the on-street parking in Exhibit A and to support the City’ s chain control operations when chain controls are in effect.

5. Insurance.

A. Heavenly shall carry and maintain, at its sole cost, the following insurance policies. i. Commercial General Liability insurance in an occurrence form in an amount of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence covering liability arising out of premises operations, personal and advertising injury, productscompleted operations, contractual liability and independent contractors. ii. Commercial Auto Liability Insurance with a limit of insurance no less than 1,000,000 combined single limit each accident for bodily injury and property damage.
iii. Worker’ s Compensation insurance as required by applicable law.

B. Heavenly shall provide the City with ( i) a copy of the carrier notice of cancellation within five days after the notice is received; and (ii) certificates of insurance evidencing the policies listed above prior to any provision of the Services. If any portion of the Services is subcontracted, Heavenly will require the subcontractor to provide the insurance listed above.

6. Hold Harmless. Heavenly shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its officials, City Council Members, officers, agents, employees, and their respective principals, officers, employees, and each of them, of and from any and all claims, demands, suits, causes of action, damages, costs, expenses, attorneys’ fee, losses or liability, in law or in equity, for personal injury, death, or property damage that may result or arise out of Heavenly’ s, its agents, employees, officers, or contractors’ actions under this Agreement.

The obligations of defense and indemnity set forth in this Section 6 shall not be limited by any insurance requirements.

7. Force Majeure. Neither party will be deemed to be in default for any delay or failure to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement to the extent that the delay or failure to perform results directly from an occurrence that is not reasonably foreseeable, caused by, or under the control of, the performing party, and occurs despite reasonable efforts to prevent, avoid, delay or mitigate the effect of that occurrence, including ( i) acts of God, fire, flood, pandemic, or explosion directly affecting the performing party; ( ii) injunctions; ( iii) restraint or acts of domestic government; or (iv) terrorism, war, sabotage, vandalism, accident, civil disorder or riots occurring within the United States or directly affecting the performing party. 931
4 8. Governing Law. This Agreement, and all claims that arise out of or relate to this Agreement, will be governed by the laws of the state of California, including its statutes of limitations, without regard to conflicts of laws principles.

9. Notices. All notices under this Agreement must be in writing and delivered to the notice address below: (i) by registered, express, or certified mail; (ii) by courier or messenger service; or (iii) by electronic mail with acknowledgement of receipt. Notice is deemed given on the date received or, if acceptance is refused, the date of attempted delivery. Either party may change its notice address by following the requirements in this Section 8.

If to Heavenly:

Heavenly Mountain Resort
Post Office Box 2180
Stateline, NV 89449
Attn: General Manager
E-mail: Shaydar. Edelmann@vailresorts. com
With a copy to:

Vail Resorts Management Company
Attention: Legal Dept.
390 Interlocken Crescent
Broomfield, Colorado 80021
E-mail: legalnotices@vailresorts. com
If to the City:

The City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Attention: Assistant City Manager
E-mail: hroverud@cityofslt. gov
With a copy to:

City Attorney
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
E-mail : hstroud@cityofslt. gov

10. Amendment. The parties may alter this Agreement only by written amendment signed by the parties.

11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter described herein and supersedes all prior agreements, whether written or oral, relating to the same subject. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of any other document, the terms of this Agreement will control.

12. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which taken together form one agreement. Signatures provided by facsimile or other electronic methods are equivalent to original signatures.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
932
5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the Effective Date.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE HEAVENLY VALLEY,

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Cody Bass, Mayor Shaydar Edelmann, VP & General
Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Heather Stroud, City Attorney Susan Blankenship, City Clerk CITY SEAL:

HeatherStroud (Dec 19, 2025 13:20:48PST) Susan Blankenship ( Dec 19, 2025 12: 33: 25 PST) Cody Bass ( Dec 19, 2025 14:29:31 PST)
Cody Bass
Shaydar Edelmann (Dec19, 2025 16:43:57 PST)
933
6 EXHIBIT A
Map of On-Street Parking
934
D
1,000, 000
CR00X4325
RWD3001367- 07 (AOS)
LOS-002760138-06
X
1,000,000
SIR: $750,000
X
22322
Los Angeles, CA 90071
N
X
SIR: $ 6,500, 000
07/01/2025
7 07/ 01/2026
24554
07/ 01/ 2026
RAD500047409
D
2,000, 000
1,000,000
RWR3001183- 08 (WI)
N/A
Greenwich Insurance Company
1,000,000
X
X
07/02/2025
07/ 01/2025
07/01/2025
Liquor Liability
X
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
The City of South Lake Tahoe
XL Insurance America Inc.

X
A
D
N/A
CN101927737-STND-GAWU-25-26
Excluded
07/ 01/ 2026
2,000,000
2,000, 000
10717
100,000
1,000,000
RWE500047309 ( CA,CO,MN,UT)
CA License # 0437153
Marsh Risk & Insurance Services
633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1200
Attn: SharedSupport. Certs@Marsh. com
3860 Saddle Road
Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
07/ 01/2025
1901 Airport Drive Suite 300
07/01/2025
B
07/01/2026
07/01/2026
Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
935
C-306-2025 Heavenly Parking Agreement
Final Audit Report 2025- 12-20
Created: 2025- 12-19
By: Michelle Davis ( medavis@cityofslt. gov)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA6JXorlvaCP5l0VSglrCMP0ll5QFRPm- E C-306-2025 Heavenly Parking Agreement" History
Document created by Michelle Davis ([email protected]) 2025- 12- 19 - 7:58:56 PM GMT
Document emailed to Susan Blankenship ([email protected]) for signature 2025- 12- 19 - 7:59:02 PM GMT
Email viewed by Susan Blankenship ( sblankenship@cityofslt. gov) 2025- 12- 19 - 8:33:14 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Susan Blankenship ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025- 12-19 - 8:33:25 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Heather Stroud ([email protected]) for signature 2025- 12- 19 - 8:33:27 PM GMT
Email viewed by Heather Stroud ([email protected])
2025- 12- 19 - 9:20:05 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Heather Stroud ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025- 12-19 - 9:20:48 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2025- 12- 19 - 9:20:50 PM GMT
Email viewed by cbass@cityofslt. gov
2025- 12- 19 - 10:28:47 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Cody Bass 2025- 12- 19 - 10:29:29 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Cody Bass ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2025- 12-19 - 10:29:31 PM GMT - Time Source: server 936
Document emailed to Shaydar Edelmann ( shaydar. edelmann@vailresorts. com) for signature 2025- 12- 19 - 10:29:33 PM GMT
Email viewed by Shaydar Edelmann ([email protected]) 2025- 12- 19 - 10:57:16 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Shaydar Edelmann ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025- 12-20 - 0:43:57 AM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2025- 12- 20 - 0:43:57 AM GMT
937
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager
__________________________________
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Agenda Item #:11
Agenda Item: Long-Term Rental Incentive Program Update and Request for Additional Funding Executive Summary: The intent of the Long-Term Rental Incentive Program and ongoing efforts is to unlock existing housing for local workers. Since the program started, the program has unlocked 65 households, housed 155 residents, including children. As of today, fifty-five (55) grants have been closed and completed. Additional funding is being requested for continued operation of the program.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions:

Pass a Resolution to allocate $80,000 in additional funding for incentive grants and continue operation of the Long-Term Rental Incentive Program.

Responsible Staff Member: Lydia Zuniga, Associate Management Analyst Reviewed and Approved By: Zach Thomas, Director of Development Services Department Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance Heather Stroud, City Attorney Attachments:
01-Staff Report - LTRIP.docx
02-Resolution - Rental Incentive Program.docx
938
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 4
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: May 19, 2026
Title: Long Term Rental Incentive Program Update and Request for Additional Funding Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Lydia Zuniga, Associate Management Analyst Background: On October 19, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-082 appropriating $500,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to initiate a long-term rental incentive grant pilot program. The Resolution authorized $72,000 for program administration, $14,000 for marketing cost, $200,000 for incentive grants to property owners. Leaving a remaining balance of $214,000 for a property management incentive program. During the meeting staff was also directed to execute a sole source Professional Service Agreement (PSA) with Landing Locals to administer the pilot program.

During the City Council meeting of August 9, 2022, staff provided an update on the status of the Lease to Locals program. The update included the success of the program, modifications to the guidelines, including the recommendation to allocate $214,000 towards the continuance of the Lease to Locals program, an extension of the program until December 2023, with a request to return to Council with an amended PSA with Landing Locals; to allow for the continuation of the administration of the program. Shortly after the update, Landing Locals rebranded and changed their name to Placemate. This action included $105,000 towards administrative cost and $9,000 towards marketing efforts.

At the November 21, 2023 City Council meeting, council approved the amended Professional Services Agreement (PSA) authorizing the mayor to enter into Amendment No. 2. This Amendment is to continue administration of the “Lease to Locals” Rental Incentive Grant Program until January 15, 2025 to coincide with the administrative billing cycle. An additional $91,000 was allocated to the administration of the program and $9,000 was allocated towards marketing.

On October 22, 2024, during Councilmember Reports and Comments, Councilmember Robbins requested a change in the Lease to Locals Program Guidelines to include a six-month lease option for half of the grant. Mayor Bass seconded the item to be brought back to City Council on November 19, 2024.

At the November 19, 2024, City Council meeting, City Council directed staff to renew the contract with Placemate for twelve months and to amend the Lease to Locals Program Guidelines to allow six-month leases for half of the incentive.
939
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 4
On January 28, 2025, City Council approved the Resolution No. 2025-005, authorizing the budget appropriation of $90,000 and authorized the Mayor to execute Amendment Number 3, to the Professional Services Agreement to continue administration of the “Lease to Locals” Rental Incentive Grant Program until January 31, 2026. The action also included amending Program Guidelines for the addition of a 6-month lease option and increasing the incentive grant amount to $4,500 per qualified tenant for a 12-month lease and $2,000 per qualified tenant for a 6-month lease.

On June 3, 2025, City Council was provided a quarterly update on the Lease to Locals Program.

During the meeting staff highlighted that as of the day of the report, staff had only approved 2 grants during 2025. However, shortly after the council meeting, staff received several grants.

On August 12, 2025, City Council was provided another update on the Lease to Locals Program.

The update included, the remaining balance for new grants, number of grants provide and number of people housed since the program started. During the report, staff included four (4) separate options for Council to consider regarding the future operation of the Program. Council voted on Option one (1). End the Professional Services Agreement with Placemate in 30 days. Bring Program management in-house. Change the name to Long-Term Rental Incentive Program.

On February 10, 2026, the staff report highlighted the success of the program since the program was brought in-house, the report included marketing efforts at no cost to the city.

On May 5, 2026, the staff report outlined that the remaining balance for new grants was $15,513.69, during that time, staff had assisted 64 and housed 153 people including children.

Since the last report, staff reviewed and approved another grant, bringing the remaining balance for new grants to $6,513.69. We are in the process of reviewing an additional grant application, which will exhaust the remaining balance.

As of the date of this report, the program has assisted 65 households and housed 155 people (including children).

The table below demonstrates the breakdown of how many households and people have been assisted since the end of 2021.
940
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 3 of 4
Since the program was brought in-house, it has averaged about one grant application approval per month, which is an improvement to the operation of the program.

The table below outlines the funding for the LTR Incentive Program.

Below are summarized options for the Council to consider regarding the future operation of the Program.

Option Summary Pro Con
Option
1 Allocate additional funding for
incentive grants and continue with
the Long-Term Rental Incentive
Program in-house and pass a
Resolution to allocate an additional
$80,000 for the program.

Program continuity
Additional funding is
required for incentive
grants. Source of
funding will be as
follows:
$50,000 from 271-
03113-48041 and
$30,000 from the
General Fund
Undesignated Excess
Reserve Revenue
account.

Option
2 End the Long-Term Incentive
Program and gradually close the
second grants.

Program completed
No additional properties
onboarded and Program
would cease operation.

The 271 account is the City’s substandard housing relocation account and is funded through substandard housing inspection fees. Staff recommends that the City Council pass a motion allocating an additional $80,000 for the program to continue operation consistent with strategic plan priority number 1.

Issue and Discussion:

The intent of the LTR Incentive Program and ongoing efforts is to unlock existing housing for local workers.

Since the program started in late 2021, the program has unlocked 65 households, housed 155 residents.

Fifty-five out of the 65 grants issues have been closed and completed. Out of the 55 closed grants, 35 renewed the lease for another year. The 2022-2027 Housing Element states that there’s also a need to provide quality, moderate income housing for year-round residents. As of today, the LTR Incentive program is the only active program within the city that’s gear towards Moderate Income level residents. 941
Council Agenda Report May 19, 2026 Page 4 of 4
Financial Implications: The program will be funded through a combination of substandard housing fees and General Fund Undesignated Excess Reserve. Using this combination of funds is intended to allow the program to continue while minimizing direct impact to the General Fund. However, the City’s substandard housing relocation account cannot provide sustained funding, and future operation of the program will likely require funding from the General Fund.

Environmental Considerations: The recommendation in this report is not a project under CEQA, because it does not involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(2) and 15378(b)(4) and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).

Policy Implications: The effort to increase the use of existing housing stock for long-term rental is identified as priority Number 1 items 1.6 and 1.7 in the City’s 2025-2030 Strategic Plan.

The Long-Term Rental Incentive program is also consistent with the following adopted General Plan Housing Element policies and programs:

Policy 1-1 The City shall adopt programs, ordinances, incentives, land use plans and other regulatory mechanisms that provide opportunities for the private sector to address the housing needs of citizens of all economic levels.

Policy 2-3 The City shall encourage a range of housing options so that people who work in South Lake Tahoe can choose to live in the City.

Policy 2-5 The City shall recognize that it will become difficult to attract employees if they cannot afford to purchase or rent housing in South Lake Tahoe. The City shall encourage and support programs and activities that create a robust local economy that provides residents with good paying employment and the means to purchase and/or rent housing in the City.

Program 3-9 Landlord/Tenant Matching Program
942
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2026-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
May 19, 2026
Authorizing an Additional $80,000 Budget Appropriations for the Long-Term Rental Incentive Program

BACKGROUND
A. On June 15, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-052 establishing the Local Fiscal Recovery Fund for receipt of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding.

B. On June 15, 2021 the City Council authorized development of the Long-Term Rental Incentive Pilot Program and allocated $500,000 in ARPA funding for the program.

C. On November 21, 2023 the City Council allocated an additional $100,000 from the sales of commodities for the Long-Term Rental Incentive Program.

D. On January 28, 2025, the City Council allocated an additional $90,000 from the General Fund Undesignated Excess Reserve for the Long-Term Rental Incentive Program.

E. The City of South Lake Tahoe continues to experience a shortage of long-term rental housing, impacting local workers, businesses, and overall housing availability within the community.

F. The Long-Term Rental Incentive Program provides financing incentives to encourage property owners to convert or maintain units as long-term rental in support of workforce housing needs.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Appropriates an additional $80,000 to continue implementation of the Long-Term Rental Incentive Program.

2. Authorizes the transfer of $50,000 from the Substandard Housing Relocation account 271- 03113-48041 to the Long-Term Rental Incentive Program account 320-30003-44029

3. Authorizes the transfer of $30,000 from the General Fund Undesignated Excess Reserve to the Long-Term Rental Incentive Program 320-30003-44029. 943
Resolution 2026-XXX May 19, 2026 Page 2 of 2
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on May 19, 2026 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk and Hilary Roverud, Interim City Manager Attachments:

APC 05 14 2026.pdf
945
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 14 2026)
Agenda Item Section
May 26, 11-2 p.m. Special Meeting Ethics and Protocols Update NB June 2, 9 a.m. City Attorney Ord-Non-Residential Structures Abandoned Construction (First ReadNB CA/PD Tobacco/Vape Moratorium Urgency Ordinance NB
City Manager Media Production Contract Award Consent
City Clerk Pride Resolution Update Consent
City Manager CivicSpark Budget Request Consent
Dev Services AHSC Transit Agreement with Capitol Corridor JPA and El Dorado TransConsent CTC Land Exchange Consent
STR Delinquency Report PH
HR Health Insurance Broker Contract Award Consent
Parks & Rec Parks & Recreation Vehicle Purchases Consent Police/CA Unpermitted VHR Report NB
Public Works CSA 3 Assessment Confirmation PH
CIP Presentation NB
Wildscape Contract Amendment for Upper Bijou Park Creek Consent 946
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 14 2026)
El Dorado Beach Update NB
June 16, 4 p.m.

June 16, 5:30 p.m.City Attorney Ord-Non-Residential Structures Abandoned Construction (Second R Consent

CC-STRSA
Lukins Bros & TKWC Franchise Agreements Consent
Interim City Attorney Appointment NB
City Clerk Resolution Consolidating Election with EDC Consent City Manager Use of Cannabis Tax Revenue NB
Finance Direct Charge of Mello-Roos Special Tax for CFD 1995-1 for FY 202 Consent Report on Collection Services for the Finance Department Consent Annual Special Tax for CFD 2001-1 Series 2015 Special Tax Refund Consent Disolution STJPPFA NB
HR City Manager Contract Award NB
Police SRO Agreement for 2026-2027 School Year Consent
Public Works Award of Construction Contract for 2026 Cape Sealing Project Consent Contract Extension SieraCon for Energy Savings Project Consent June 24, 2026, 5:30 p.m., LTCC, Special City Council Meeting-State of the City Address Special Closed Session
947
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 14 2026)
Aug 11, 9 a.m. Airport Award Runway 1836 Construction Contract Consent City Clerk Conflict of Interest Code Update Consent
City Manager 2026 National Community Survey Report NB
Becoming a BearWise Community NB
Finance Financial Policies Update inc. Local, State & US Preference Consent Fire RFP Contract Award Cole Property project
Consent
Dev Services Evaluate Feasibility - Res. Area Plan/SB9 & Remove Tourist AccomoNB Tahoe Living Housing and Mobility Fees UB
Sign Ordinance Amendments (Sub Committee Recos) UB
Parks & Rec Ice Arena Concessionaire Agreement NB
Police Vista Rise Operating Agreement & Grant report Consent Public Works Tamarack Culvert Bid Award Consent
El Dorado Beach Phase 2 Bid Award Consent
Drainage Master Plan Consultant Award Consent
Aug 25, 9 a.m. Budget Workshop
Sept 8, 9 a.m. Airport Airport Master Plan adoption NB
948
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 14 2026)
City Manager Progress on Joining a CCA NB
Exploration of becoming a public electric utility NB
Informational item - Check Cashing + Bill Pay Services Options NB Dev Services Mid Town Area Plan Adoption PH
Quarterly Housing Report NB
Housing Element Final Draft Review NB
Finance Investment Policy Update Consent
Sept 22, 5:30 p.m. Finance Quarterly Budget and Financial Status Report as of June 2026 Consent Investment Portfolio Report as of June 2026 Consent
Oct 5, 5:30 p.m. City Clerk Ordinance Increasing City Council Compensation (First Reading) NB Finance GAAN Limit Consent
Nov 3, 9:30 a.m. City Clerk Ordinance Increasing City Council Compensation (Second Reading) Consent Finance TID Annual Report NB
Nov 17, 5:30 p.m.

Dec 1, 9 a.m. City Clerk Certification of Election
Outgoing Councilmember Recognition
If Election is Certified
by December 1, if not
these items will be
brought forward
949
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 14 2026)
Oath of Office
City Council Re-Organization Mayor/Mayor Pro Tem
2027 City Council Meeting Schedule
Dec 15, 5:30 p.m. Finance Annual ROPS Approval
Investment Portfolio Report as of September 2026 Consent Quarterly Budget and Financial Status Report as of September 2026 CA/PD Shared Mobility Device Ordinance 2027 review
City Clerk
City Manager LTCC Fire Training Center Coverage Agreement City Green Card Assistance Program
Grants/Funding for Undergrounding Utilities
Legislative Agenda
CM/CA Rec Center Re-Use Outreach
Dev Services Performance Bond as a Condition of Demolition Fire MOU Ratification of Auto Aid with TDFD
Unscheduled/Pending

brought forward
December 15
950
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 14 2026)
LVFD MOU update for data sharing
CTC Land Access Agreement for Airport project
Parks & Rec Events and Facitilies Naming Rights Discussion El Dorado Boat Ramp Dock Replacement Purchase
Regan Beach Environmental & Design RFP
Future of Senior Center
Police Barton Community Health Needs and Harm Reduction Update SANE Presentation with Barton
Heavenly Village Employee Discount Parking Passes
Ratification of Application for CalOES DVRT
Massage Ordinance Update/Amendments
Employee Parking at Heavenly Village
Police/PW Bike Paths/Speed Bumps, Bike Parking, Vehicle Parking 2026 Update to Parking Fees in the Bellamy Parking Garage Public Works Geothermal Use Discussion Item
Paving Policy Prioritization of Total Users
951
2026 Agenda Planning Calendar (Updated 05 14 2026)
Award of PD Roof Replacement
TTD US 50 Plans Presentation
Award Lakeview and Ski Run Electrical Upgrades
Facilities Condition Assessment
Ski Run Electrification
952

South Lake Tahoe City CouncilMay 19, 2026

South Lake Tahoe City Council
May 19, 2026