Cities Index.
Agenda

St. Helena City Council
May 1, 2023

Document
Agenda
Meeting
May 1, 2023
Body
St. Helena City Council
Pages
4,422
Original file
387.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sthelenaca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility.

Date of Government Version: 10/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/13/2017
Number of Days to Update: 12
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: 518-402-8651
Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-783-8990
Last EDR Contact: 01/16/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 401-222-2797
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2017
Number of Days to Update: 92
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: PennWell Corporation
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.

Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.

Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.

AHA Hospitals:

Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.

Telephone: 312-280-5991
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.

Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: 410-786-3000
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

TC5167765.2s Page GR-46

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2478 of 4422 ends

Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: 301-594-6248
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.

Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states.

Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.

Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities
Source: Department of Social Services
Telephone: 916-657-4041
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.

Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish & Game
Telephone: 916-445-0411
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC5167765.2s Page GR-47

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2479 of 4422 ends

APPENDIX E

NAPA COUNTY PESTICIDE USE REPORT
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2480 of 4422 ends

Permit # Permitee Site Location Site Name Meridian Township Range Section Application Date Application Time Commodity Code Commodity Pre-plant Planted Amount Planted Units EPA Reg No Product Name Quantity Used Quantity Units Treated Amount Treated Units Appl. Method Fume Code Applicator Name Document# Submitted By Submitted Date Entered By Time Stamp Date Time Stamp Time Rpt Status Sub Status 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 2/20/2013 8:00 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 524-549-AA ROUNDUP POWERMAX 1.1700 Gallon 2.7400 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 3377 KENDALL-JACKSON 3/12/2013 cardinale 3/12/2013 12:00 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 2/20/2013 8:00 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 59639-99-AA CHATEAU 1.8700 Pounds 2.7400 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 3377 KENDALL-JACKSON 3/12/2013 cardinale 3/12/2013 12:00 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/26/2013 6:00 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-AA PURE SPRAY GREEN 3.0000 Gallon 7.5300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 3440 KENDALL-JACKSON 5/8/2013 cardinale 5/8/2013 6:44 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/1/2015 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 2.5200 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4418707 GROWER APPLIED 8/12/2015 agrian_data 8/12/2015 7:27 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/19/2015 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 4.0000 Gallon 8.0000 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4423247 GROWER APPLIED 8/13/2015 agrian_data 8/13/2015 7:05 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/19/2015 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 62719-410-ZC RALLY 40 WSP 2.0000 Pounds 8.0000 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4423247 GROWER APPLIED 8/13/2015 agrian_data 8/13/2015 7:05 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/18/2015 10:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 8.0000 Gallon 8.0000 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4423250 GROWER APPLIED 8/13/2015 agrian_data 8/13/2015 7:10 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/18/2015 10:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-199-AA PRISTINE(R) FUNGICID 9.0000 Pounds 8.0000 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4423250 GROWER APPLIED 8/13/2015 agrian_data 8/13/2015 7:10 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/10/2015 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 80289-8-AA METTLE 125 ME 0.2500 Gallon 8.0000 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4423254 GROWER APPLIED 8/13/2015 agrian_data 8/13/2015 7:13 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/10/2015 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50189-AA SYL-COAT 0.2500 Gallon 8.0000 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4423254 GROWER APPLIED 8/13/2015 agrian_data 8/13/2015 7:13 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 7/2/2015 9:00 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 8.0000 Gallon 8.0000 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4423260 GROWER APPLIED 8/13/2015 agrian_data 8/13/2015 7:19 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 7/2/2015 9:00 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-199-AA PRISTINE(R) FUNGICID 9.0000 Pounds 8.0000 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4423260 GROWER APPLIED 8/13/2015 agrian_data 8/13/2015 7:19 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 1/18/2016 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 524-549-AA ROUNDUP POWERMAX HER 2.5200 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4775946 GROWER APPLIED 2/3/2016 agrian_data 2/3/2016 4:20 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 1/18/2016 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 59639-99-AA CHATEAU(R) HERBICIDE 3.7700 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 4775946 GROWER APPLIED 2/3/2016 agrian_data 2/3/2016 4:20 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/11/2016 4:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 51036-352-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 15.0900 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5171221 GROWER APPLIED 6/8/2016 agrian_data 6/8/2016 10:55 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/11/2016 4:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-199-AA PRISTINE(R) FUNGICID 3.7700 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5171221 GROWER APPLIED 6/8/2016 agrian_data 6/8/2016 10:55 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/23/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-284-AA VIVANDO(R) FUNGICIDE 0.5900 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5178133 GROWER APPLIED 6/9/2016 agrian_data 6/9/2016 10:01 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/23/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 51036-352-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 15.0900 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5178133 GROWER APPLIED 6/9/2016 agrian_data 6/9/2016 10:01 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/23/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50189-AA SYL-COAT 0.0900 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5178133 GROWER APPLIED 6/9/2016 agrian_data 6/9/2016 10:01 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/7/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 264-777-AA FLINT FUNGICIDE 0.6300 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5320748 GROWER APPLIED 7/11/2016 agrian_data 7/11/2016 3:13 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/7/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 5.0300 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5320748 GROWER APPLIED 7/11/2016 agrian_data 7/11/2016 3:13 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/7/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50189-AA SYL-COAT 0.1300 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5320748 GROWER APPLIED 7/11/2016 agrian_data 7/11/2016 3:13 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/29/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 5.0300 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5320771 GROWER APPLIED 7/11/2016 agrian_data 7/11/2016 3:14 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/29/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 400-518-ZD VITICURE (003/061209 0.3100 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5320771 GROWER APPLIED 7/11/2016 agrian_data 7/11/2016 3:14 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/29/2016 1:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50189-AA SYL-COAT 0.1300 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5320771 GROWER APPLIED 7/11/2016 agrian_data 7/11/2016 3:14 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 3/1/2017 6:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 524-549-AA ROUNDUP POWERMAX HER 2.5200 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5966775 GROWER APPLIED 3/22/2017 agrian_data 3/22/2017 1:05 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 3/1/2017 6:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 59639-99-AA CHATEAU(R) HERBICIDE 3.7700 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 5966775 GROWER APPLIED 3/22/2017 agrian_data 3/22/2017 1:05 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/20/2017 2:30 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 51036-352-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 25.1500 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6357301 GROWER APPLIED 6/29/2017 agrian_data 6/29/2017 1:06 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/20/2017 2:30 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50200-AA RAINIER-EA 0.1600 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6357301 GROWER APPLIED 6/29/2017 agrian_data 6/29/2017 1:06 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/28/2017 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 51036-352-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 10.0600 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6222662 GROWER APPLIED 5/31/2017 agrian_data 5/31/2017 3:27 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/28/2017 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50200-AA RAINIER-EA 0.1600 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6222662 GROWER APPLIED 5/31/2017 agrian_data 5/31/2017 3:27 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/24/2017 1:00 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50200-AA RAINIER-EA 0.1600 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6246967 GROWER APPLIED 6/6/2017 agrian_data 6/6/2017 9:23 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/24/2017 1:00 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 51036-352-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 25.1500 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6246967 GROWER APPLIED 6/6/2017 agrian_data 6/6/2017 9:23 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/24/2017 2:30 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 51036-352-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 25.1500 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6358000 GROWER APPLIED 6/29/2017 agrian_data 6/29/2017 2:10 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/24/2017 2:30 PM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50200-AA RAINIER-EA 0.1600 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6358000 GROWER APPLIED 6/29/2017 agrian_data 6/29/2017 2:10 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/18/2017 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 51036-352-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 15.0900 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6407307 GROWER APPLIED 7/10/2017 agrian_data 7/10/2017 12:17 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/18/2017 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50200-AA RAINIER-EA 0.3100 Gallon 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6407307 GROWER APPLIED 7/10/2017 agrian_data 7/10/2017 12:17 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/18/2017 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 264-777-AA FLINT FUNGICIDE 0.6200 Pounds 5.0300 ACRES Ground Grower Applied 6407307 GROWER APPLIED 7/10/2017 agrian_data 7/10/2017 12:17 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/10/2013 4:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 3.0000 Gallon 7.5300 ACRES Ground WEB132449162 cardinale 6/6/2013 8:14 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/10/2013 4:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 80289-8-AA METTLE 125 ME FUNGICIDE 1.2500 Quart 7.5300 ACRES Ground WEB132449162 cardinale 6/6/2013 8:14 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/5/2013 2:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 1.2500 Gallon 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB132470313 cardinale 7/17/2013 10:27 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/5/2013 2:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 62719-375-AA QUINTEC 1.2600 Quart 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB132470313 cardinale 7/17/2013 10:27 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/29/2013 10:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 100-1317-AA INSPIRE SUPER 3.1200 Quart 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB132494379 cardinale 9/6/2013 8:21 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/29/2013 10:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50161-AA SYLGARD 309 1.2500 Pint 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB132494379 cardinale 9/6/2013 8:21 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 2/24/2014 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 524-549-AA ROUNDUP POWERMAX HERBICIDE 1.2500 Gallon 2.7400 ACRES Ground WEB142556533 cardinale 3/25/2014 8:37 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 2/24/2014 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 241-418-AA PROWL H2O HERBICIDE 2.5000 Gallon 2.7400 ACRES Ground WEB142556533 cardinale 3/25/2014 8:37 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 2/24/2014 7:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50171-AA CAYUSE PLUS 1.2500 Gallon 2.7400 ACRES Ground WEB142556533 cardinale 3/25/2014 8:37 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/14/2014 4:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-61-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 15.0000 Pounds 7.5300 ACRES Ground WEB142570148 cardinale 4/28/2014 11:04 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/14/2014 4:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50185-AA R-56 20.0000 Ounce 7.5300 ACRES Ground WEB142570148 cardinale 4/28/2014 11:04 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/14/2014 4:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 80289-12-AA BADGE X2 5.0000 Pounds 7.5300 ACRES Ground WEB142570148 cardinale 4/28/2014 11:04 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/28/2014 5:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 264-1091-AA LUNA EXPERIENCE 2.0000 Quart 7.5300 ACRES Ground WEB142652914 cardinale 11/5/2014 8:46 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 6/28/2014 5:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 3.7700 Gallon 7.5300 ACRES Ground WEB142652914 cardinale 11/5/2014 8:46 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/29/2014 5:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-61-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 22.5000 Pounds 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB142654741 cardinale 11/11/2014 9:15 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/29/2014 5:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50161-AA SYLGARD 309 1.8800 Pint 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB142654741 cardinale 11/11/2014 9:15 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/29/2014 5:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-199-AA PRISTINE FUNGICIDE 5.6500 Pounds 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB142654741 cardinale 11/11/2014 9:15 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/1/2014 3:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-61-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 22.0000 Pounds 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB142655961 cardinale 11/17/2014 12:53 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/1/2014 3:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50185-AA R-56 2.0000 Pint 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB142655961 cardinale 11/17/2014 12:53 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 5/1/2014 3:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 80289-8-AA METTLE 125 ME FUNGICIDE 40.0000 Ounce 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB142655961 cardinale 11/17/2014 12:53 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/21/2014 3:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 7969-61-AA-2935 SULFUR DF 22.0000 Pounds 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB142655960 cardinale 11/17/2014 12:48 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 4/21/2014 3:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50185-AA R-56 2.0000 Pint 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB142655960 cardinale 11/17/2014 12:48 PM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 2/1/2015 9:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 524-549-AA ROUNDUP POWERMAX HERBICIDE 150.0000 Ounce 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB152680193 cardinale 3/5/2015 8:58 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 2/1/2015 9:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 2935-50171-AA CAYUSE PLUS 32.0000 Ounce 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB152680193 cardinale 3/5/2015 8:58 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 2/1/2015 9:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 59639-99-AA CHATEAU HERBICIDE SW 30.0000 Ounce 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB152680193 cardinale 3/5/2015 8:58 AM ACC DPR 4903045 CARDINALE WINERY VAN Z VINEYARD N END OF ADAMS M 08N 05W 30 3/31/2015 3:00 AM 29143-0 GRAPE, WINE No 8.0000 ACRES 69526-9-ZA PURESPRAY GREEN 4.0000 Gallon 8.0000 ACRES Ground WEB152691001 cardinale 4/9/2015 8:37 AM ACC DPR Page 2481 of 4422 Agenda Item #5.7.

APPENDIX F

HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2482 of 4422 ends

The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Hunter Property Adams Street Saint Helena, CA 94574 Inquiry Number: January 25, 2018 5167765.5 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2483 of 4422 ends

2014 1"=500' Flight Year: 2014 USDA/NAIP
2010 1"=500' Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=500' Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
1993 1"=500' Acquisition Date: July 10, 1993 USGS/DOQQ
1982 1"=500' Flight Date: July 08, 1982 USDA
1973 1"=500' Flight Date: September 27, 1973 USGS
1968 1"=500' Flight Date: April 18, 1968 USGS
1958 1"=500' Flight Date: October 02, 1958 USDA
1953 1"=500' Flight Date: April 24, 1953 USDA
1947 1"=500' Flight Date: March 01, 1947 USGS
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 01/25/18 Hunter Property Site Name: Client Name: EBA Engineering Adams Street 825 Sonoma Avenue Saint Helena, CA 94574 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 EDR Inquiry # 5167765.5 Contact: David Noren Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5167765 - 5 page 2 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2484 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 2014 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2485 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 2010 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2486 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 2006 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2487 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 1993 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2488 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 1982 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2489 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 1973 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2490 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 1968 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2491 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 1958 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2492 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 1953 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2493 of 4422 ends

5167765.5 1947 = 500'
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2494 of 4422 ends

APPENDIX G

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2495 of 4422 ends

DAVID M. NOREN

MANAGER, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
Registered Environmental Assessor, California
OSHA 40 Hour Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency Response Training OSHA 8 Hour Hazardous Waste Activities Management Training Supervisor Training in Hazardous Waste Operations
American Red Cross First Aid and CPR
Board Member North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
M.Sc., Environmental Management
University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California
B.Sc., Agricultural Science & Management
University of California Davis, Davis, California

EXPERIENCE SUMMARY
Mr. Noren is a Registered Environmental Assessor with over 25 years of experience in the field of environmental assessments and investigations. Prior experience includes technical and management services for a wide range of environmental, hydrogeologic, and solid waste landfill projects. The nature and scope of these projects have included field and management positions for property assessments, assessments of surface and subsurface geologic investigations, underground fuel storage tank investigations and remediation, hydrogeologic characterization investigations, remedial action design and implementation of soil, groundwater, and landfill gas corrective action programs and storm water management sampling and reporting.

At EBA Engineering, Mr. Noren is the Manager of Environmental Services and oversees a number of projects including site investigations and monitoring, environmental assessments, as well as providing technical support and management services for solid waste management projects. The management requirements include the oversight of project budgets, client interactions, site investigation activities and field and reporting programs.

Mr. Noren has experience in the application of numerous investigative and treatment methodologies in a wide range of geologic environments including performing the investigation and remediation of a diverse range of contaminated sites and municipal solid waste facilities.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2496 of 4422 ends

HYDROLOGYANALYSIS
For

HUNTERSUBDIVISION
ST. HELENA,CA
APN: O09-O30-O57
Project #4110047.0 January 25, 2019
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2497 of 4422 ends

HUNTERSUBDIVISION

HYDROLOGYANALYSIS
-

TABLEOF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

EXHIBITA
Proposed Conditions - lmpervious Areas Exhibit

EXHIBITB
Agreement of Purchase and Sale

EXHIBITC
Figure No.6 — Overall Site Map Sub Basin Delineation Map Mead & Hunt
— Interior Drainage Analysis FinalReport
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2498 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

HYDROLOGYANALYSIS

EXECUTIVESUMMARY
This report is intended to respond to the City of St. He|ena’s Second Notification of Identified Issues - Hunter Residential Subdivision Tentative Map Application Comment number 2a. which asks us to, ’’Complete Hydrologic analysis identifying existing drainage features and patterns; modeling pre— and post— project run off rates and volumes; and substantiating applicants claim of adequate detention basin capacity made in the draft EIR..." In order to substantiate the claim that the detention basin has adequate capacity we have included the January 2009 agreement of sale between The City of St. Helena and Dennis Hunter. Section 1.7c of the above agreement states, ”The City will size, at no additional cost to Hunter, storm water drainage handling facilities downstream of the site, to be constructed as part of the [St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Control Protection Project], based upon projected bui|d—out of the Hunter Remainder and the 3.58 acres, zoned Medium—density residential (MR) as of the Effective Date of this Agreement (as defined in the St. Helena Municipal Code Section

17.40), expressed as a 70% impervious drainage watershed”. See Exhibit B for the full agreement.

We have also included portions of the previous City of St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Protection Project's Interior Drainage Analysis Final Report for the Miller Property/Hunter Property/Hunt Avenue. The sections included in Exhibit C demonstrates the existing and proposed conditions for the Hunter property referred to as Sub—basin 4 in Figure 6 of the report. The section included in Exhibit B show that for the existing 10-year storm event, subbasin 4 was assigned an impervious percentage of 0, which matches the pre—project condition of the site. This same sub—basinwas assigned a value of 70% impervious in the proposed 100- year storm event model. This proposed condition matches the agreement language for the Hunter property.

Per the Agreement with the City of St. Helena and the City of St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Protection Project's Interior Drainage Analysis Final Report for the Miller Property/Hunter Property/Hunt Avenue, it is assumed that the detention system installed as part of the Comprehensive Flood Protection Project accounts for the future development of the Hunter parcel to an extent of 70% impervious. The proposed Hunter parcel development has been shown to be only 58% impervious, and thus meets both the agreement and the condition analyzed in the Mead & Hunt report. As such no additional storm water volume control Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2499 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2500 of 4422 ends

HUNTERSUBDIVISION

HYDROLOGYANALYSIS

EXHIBITA

IMPERVIOUSAREASEXHIBIT
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2501 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

PROPOSED IMPERVIOUSARIE
AS
‘
DR/\/EM/AYAREA5 = 0.57 A6
-
BU/L0/N6 A/2545 = 4.76 A 6 GALGULA7'/ON
-
57/QEET5 AND 5/DENALK ARE/45 : 5.53 A6 /MP ARE/45 = /0.4/ A6 TOT/4/QE/4: /3.50 A6
LE6E/VD
P;20_/Ear Boy/\/17,4/=27’ L/NE (rar/IL AREA #550 A5) 90’/MPERV/005 = /0.4/ A6 / /&&0 A0 = 5&% '

ICJIJEJ
IJEJLI
LQ
L
I
CITYOFS YIEEMO07~
030—
OIl7
<9RAPH/6 56/I/_E
O /50 /50 300
~ ~ » I
I
' //N FEET] KI W£ STREET FOURTH 1515
//no/2 : /50 FT ( / L 94559 CALIF. NPA,
OFFICE|707|252.3
www.RSAcivi|.com ++
+SURVEYORS RsA+| ENGINEERS 1530 CONSULTING CIVIL
///20/20/.9
R:\2OIO\4IIO04’!.O_Huntar_SuboII\/I5Ion\De5IgnC3D\TM\N0rI:ahaaI:5\BTF\IMP_AR.EA6_tmO5grad.dwg ll/20/ZOIB

Page 2502 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2503 of 4422 ends

HUNTERSUBDIVISION

HYDROLOGYANALYSIS

EXHIBITB
CITYOF ST. HELENAAND HUNTERAGREEMENT
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2504 of 4422 ends

4 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE
THIS AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of January _, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the City of St. Helena (the “City”), and Dennis R. Hunter (“Hunter”).

RECITALS
A. Hunter owns that certain real property located in the City of St. Helena, State of California, consisting of approximately 3.69 acres, together with all appurtenant improvements, rights, interests, easements, tenements and estates, a portion of APN No. O09~030-020,more fully described on Exhibit A (the “Hunter Property”).

B. A portion of the Hunter Property, consisting of approximately 1.20 acres, as shown on ExhibitB, is located below the ?ood plain (the “L20 Acres”). The remainingportion of the Hunter Property, consistingof approximately 2.39 acres as shown on ExhibitB, is located above the ?ood plain (the “2.39 Acres”). A .10 acre portion of the Hunter Property located below the ?oodplain is not shown on ExhibitB
C. The City owns that certain real property located in the City of St. Helena, State of California, consisting of approximately3.58 acres located below the flood plain, together with all appurtenant improvements, rights, interests, easements, tenements and estates, as more fully described on Exhibit C (the “3.58 Acres”). The Hunter Property and the 3.58 Acres may be referred to individuallyas a “property" and collectively as the “properties.” D. The Hunter Property and the 3.58 Acres are designated in the City’s general plan as MR / Medium Density Residential5.1 to 16 units per acre.

E. The City intends to use the 3.58 Acres for the advancementof the St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Control Protection Project (the “Project”) based on the City’s desire to acquire the Hunter Property from Hunter and Hunterls desire to acquire the 3.58 Acres from the City, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

F. In furtherance of the Project, the City has secured a loan fromthe State Revolving Fund of the State Water Resources Control Board, the terms of which require that the City request funds for property acquisition thirty to forty—?ve(3045) days before the close of escrow on the purchase of such property.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledgedby the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.1 Lot Line Adjustment. The City hereby covenants and agrees to promptly process and cause to be recorded at Closing (as defined below) the lot line adjustments required to establish the property con?gurations shown on Exhibit D, Following the Lot Line Adjustment, Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and 1 Between the City ofSt. Helenaand Dennis Hunter
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2505 of 4422 ends

the City will own 15.69] acres and Hunter will own 16.903 acres. The Lot Line Adjustment shall have been recorded in the Of?cial Records of the County such that the Property can be transferred to Hunter in accordancewith California Government Code Section 66410 et seg. (the "Map Condition"). In light of the decision in Black Hills Investments, Inc. v. Alberts0n's Inc. (2007) 146 Cal. App. 4th 883.

1.2 Grant of Temporary Easement. For good and valuable consideration, Hunter hereby grants to theCity an exclusive easement (the “Temporary Easement”) to use the Hunter Property prior to the Close of Escrow (as defined below) for the purposes set forth in the St.

Helena Comprehensive Flood Control Protection Project. The Temporary Easement herein granted shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall merge into the grant deed upon Hunter’s conveyance of the Hunter Property to the City.

1.3 Grant of Construction Easement. For good and valuable consideration,Hunter hereby grants to the City a temporary, non-exclusive easement (the “Construction Easement”), in accordance with the terms of that certain ConstructionEasement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E, over, under, across, above and through that certain real property shown on Exhibit E hereto (the “Construction Easement Area”) for ingress and egress and for construction related purposes in connection with the Project. This Construction Easement is intended to be temporary in nature and shall terminate on December 31, 2012.

1.4 Grant of Utili? Easement. For good and valuable consideration, Hunter hereby grants to the City a non—exc1usiveperpetual easement (the Utility Easement”), in accordance with the terms of that certain Utility Easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F, over under, across, above and through that certain real property shown on Exhibit F hereto (the “Utility Easement Area”) for the purposes of installing, constructing, operating, using, maintaining, repairing, and replacing utility facilities, lines or connections and any uses incidental thereto.

1.5 Depositing of Dirt. Hunter hereby grants to the City the right, at no additional cost to the City and at no cost to Hunter, to deposit dirt, excavated by the City in connection with the Project, on that certain real property (the “Fill Area”) described on the Soil Stockpile Grading Plan attached hereto as Exhibit G. City and its contractors and agents shall prepare the Pill Area to receive the dirt by removing vines and other vineyard improvementsand place the fill in a good and workman~likemanner.

1.6 Well Access License. Hunter hereby grants to the City a license at no additional cost to the City and at no cost to Hunter, to access and use water from the existing well shown on Exhibit G in connection with the Project. For good and valuable consideration,Hunter hereby grants to the City a temporary, non-exclusive license (the “Well Access License”) over, under, across, above and through properties to be owned by Hunter, includingthe 3.58 Acres. This further documentation, upon completionof the Project. Agreement o[‘Purchase and Sale By and 2 Between the City of St. Helena and DennisHunter
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2506 of 4422 ends

1.7 Drainage Improvements. The City intendsas a part of the Project to build certain retention and drainage facilities as speci?cally describedas follows:
(a) The City will construct a compacted earth ?ll pad on the remainder of APN No. 009-030-020 (“Hunter Remainder”) (exclusive of the Hunter Property) and on the

3.58 Acres in accordance with the enclosed Exhibit G. The source of the soil material to construct the pad shall be the City’s Flood Protection Project, with unsuitable material (de?ned as organic content in excess of 3.5%) segregated and placed in areas outside of the useable pad area shown on Exhibit G. Pad construction will comply with the notes on the exhibit and ?nish graded to provide positive drainage in accordance withExhibit G. The level of the pad may vary ' based upon the amount of material generated from the Project with the elevation of the pad adjusted uniformly.
(b) Upon completion of the Project, the then existing drainagepatterns for the Hunter Remainder and the 3.58 Acres shall remain undisturbedby the City, with exception of the new pad drainage. Drainage ditches on the pad will be routed to the new detention basin shown on Exhibit G. The City will modify its existing detention basin inlet from the storm drain system to provide a storm drain inlet for pad drainage.
(c) The City will size, at no additional cost to Hunter, storm water drainage handling facilities downstream of the site, to be constructed as part of the Project, based upon projected build-out of the Hunter Remainder and the 3.58 Acres, zoned Medium-density Residential (MR) as of the Effective Date of this Agreement (as de?ned in the St. Helena Municipal Code Section 17.40), expressed as a 70% imperviousdrainage watershed. (d) The City agrees to reroute the existing water main crossing the Hunter Remainder in Basement 895 (OR 383 NCR), as shown on theenclosed Exhibit H. Relocation will be completed by the City prior to development of the Hunter Remainderand the 3.58 Acres.

The City’s easement for the section of pipe being abandoned will be quit-claimed and returned to Hunter once the relocation is complete.

1.8 Sewer Connection. Upon any application for developmentof the Hunter Property as referenced in this Agreement, City will not unreasonablywithhold its permission for Hunter to cross City property to access a sewer connection. Nothing in this section shall be construed as an entitlement to development under the current medium density residentialzoning, and Hunter is responsible for obtaining all necessary development approvals from the City and any other agencies with jurisdiction over the Hunter Property.

1.9 Covenants Runningwith the Land. The tenns and conditions contained in this Article 1 shall (a) constitute covenants running with the land, (b) survive the Close of Escrow,

1.10 Payment of Taxes. All real property taxes and assessments on the Hunter Property (prior to Close of Escrow) and the Construction Easement Area shall be payable by Agreement Hunter. of Purchase and Sale By and 3
Between the City ofSt. Helena and DennisHunter
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2507 of 4422 ends

ARTICLE 2: PURCHASE AND SALE

2.1 Hunter Propegty. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the City requires the Hunter Property in connection with the Project. Accordingly, the City has forced a sale of the Hunter Property by Hunter under the threat of condemnation,on the terms and conditionsset forth herein.

2.2 3.58 Acres. As partial consideration for the sale of the Hunter Property pursuant to Section 2.1, above, the City hereby agrees to convey the 3.58 Acres to Hunter, on the terms and conditionsset forth herein.

ARTICLE 3: PURCHASE PRICE

3.1 Purchase Price. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the fair market value of the 1.20 Acres and the 3.58 Acres is Three Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($325,000) per acre and that the fair market value of the 2.39 Acres is Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000) per acre. Consequently, the agreed upon value of each property is as follows:

E_r9pe_rty Value

3.58 Acres $1,163,500 (valued at $325,000 per acre)

1.20 Acres $390,000 (valued at $325,000 per acre)

2.39 Acres $1,673,000 (valued at $700,000 per acre)
Thus, the balance of the purchase price to be paid by the City at Closing shall be $899,500 [the value of the 1.20 acres and the 2.39 acres ($1,673,000 + $390,000) minus the credit received by the City for the 3.58 acres ($l,l63,500)].

ARTICLE 4: CLOSING

4.1 Closing. Hunter hereby covenants and agrees to cooperate with the City in connection with the City’s application for a loan from the State Revolving Fund of the State Water Resources Control Board and satisfying all requirements thereof. The consummationof the transactions contemplated herein (the “Closing” or “Close of Escrow”) shall occur on or before February 1, 2008 at the office of North Bay Title Co, Santa Rosa, California (“Escrow Agent”); provided, however, that the date for the Close of Escrow shall be subject to extension to the extent required by the State Revolving Fund. Upon satisfaction or completion of all closing conditions and deliveries, the parties shall direct Escrow Agent to immediatelyrecord and deliver the closing documentsto the appropriate parties and make disbursementsaccording to the closing statements executed by the City and Hunter. to if any, charged by Escrow Agent, shall be paid in accordance with customary practices in Napa Agreement County. ofPurchase and Sale By and 4 Between the City ofSt. Helenaand Dennis Hunter
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2508 of 4422 ends

4.3 Hunter’s Deliveries into Escrow. At least one (1) business day prior tothe Closing Date, Hunter shall deliver to Escrow Agent for distributionto the appropriate party(ies) at Closing, the following:
(a) Grant Deed. A grant deed in conformity with the custom in the State of California, executed and acknowledged by Hunter, conveying to the City fee simple title to the Hunter Property.
(b) Prorations. Hunter’s share of any prorations or expenses. (c) Tax Certi?cates. A Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act affidavit and a California Form 593—C,executed by Hunter.
(d) State Law Disclosures. Such disclosures and reports as are required by applicable state and local law in connection with the conveyance of real property. (e) Additional Documents. Any additional documentsthat the City or the Escrow Agent may reasonably require for the proper consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

4.4 The Citfs Deliveries into Escrow. At least one (1) business day prior to the Closing Date, the City shall deliver to Escrow Agent for distribution to the appropriate party(ies) at Closing, the following:
(a) Purchase Price. The balance of the purchase price, if any, plus or minus applicableprorations and expenses.
(b) Grant Deed. A grant deed in conformity with the custom in the State of California, executed and acknowledgedby the City, conveying to Hunter fee simple title to the

3.58 Acres.
(0) State Law Disclosures. Such disclosures and reports as are required by applicablestate and local law in connection with the conveyance of real property. (d) Additional Documents. Any additional documentsthat Hunter or the Escrow Agent may reasonably require for the proper consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

4.5 Closing Statements. At least one (1) business day prior to the Closing Date, Hunter and the City shall deposit with Escrow Agent executed closing statements consistent with this Agreement in the form required by Escrow Agent.

5.l Prorations. Agreement 0fPurchase and Sale By and 5
Between the City ofSt. Helena and Dennis Hunter
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2509 of 4422 ends

(a) Taxes and Assessments. All non-delinquent real estate taxes and nondelinquent assessments on the properties shall be prorated as of 12:01 am. on the day of the Close of Escrow based on the actual current tax bill. All delinquent taxes and all delinquent assessments, interest and penalties (if any) with respect to a property, shall be paid at the Close of Escrow by the party conveying such property. If any information needed for the ?nal proration of any item is not available as reasonably determined by Escrow Agent and the parties are noti?ed of the same prior to Closing, the parties shall re—prorate such item after Closing and payment shall be made promptly to the party entitled thereto. The provisions of this Section

5.l(a) shall survive the Close of Escrow
(b) Sales, Transfer, and Documentary Taxes. The parties shall pay, in accordance with customary practices in Napa County, all sales, gross receipts, compensating, stamp, excise, documentary, transfer, deed or similar taxes and fees imposed in connection with the transactionscontemplated hereunder.

5.2 No Brokers. Hunter and the City represent and warrant each to the other that they have not dealt with any real estate broker, sales person or ?nder in connection with this Agreement. In the event of any claim for broker’s or f1nder’sfees or commissions in connection with the negotiation, execution or consummation of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, each party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any such claim based upon any statement, representation or agreement of such party.

ARTICLE 6: REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

6.1 Hunter’s Representations and Warranties. Hunter represents and warrants to the City that:
(a) Con?icts and Pending Actions or Proceedings. There is no agreement to which Hunter is a party or, to Hunter ’s knowledge, binding on Hunter which is in conflict with this Agreement. There is no action or proceedingpending or, to Hunter’s knowledge, threatened against Hunter or relating to the Hunter Property which challenges or impairs Hunter’s ability to execute or perform its obligations under this Agreement. (b) No Encumbrances. Hunter has not alienated, encumbered, transferred, mortgaged, assigned, pledged, or otherwiseconveyed its interest in the Hunter Property or any portion thereof, nor entered into any agreement to do so, and there are no liens, encumbrances, mortgages, covenants, conditions, reservations,restrictions, easements or other matters affecting the Hunter Property, except as disclosed in the preliminary title report delivered to the City.

Hunter shall not, directly or indirectly, alienate,encumber, transfer, mortgage, assign,pledge, or otherwise convey its interest prior to the Close of Escrow, as long as this Agreement is in force.

Any encumbrances which are recorded against the property prior to the Close of Escrow must precedent
to the Close of Escrow. Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and 6 Between the City ofSt. Helena and DennisHunter Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2510 of 4422 ends

(c) Contractors and Suppliers. All contractors, subcontractors,suppliers, architects, engineers, and others who have performed services or labor or have suppliedmaterials in connectionwith Hunter’s acquisition, development,ownership, or management of the Hunter Property have been paid in full and all liens arising therefrom (or claims which with the passage of time or the giving of notice, or both, could mature into liens) have been satis?ed and released.

6.2 City’s Representations and Warranties. The City represents and warrants to Hunter that the City has the full right, capacity, power and authority to enter into and carry out the terms of this Agreement The City represents that the 3.58 Acres has a current zoning of medium—densityresidential as shown on the City’s current zoning map. This Agreement has been duly executed by the City, and upon delivery to and execution by Hunter shall be a valid and binding agreement of the City.

6.3 Survival of Representations and Warranties. The representations and warranties set forth in this Article 6 are made as of the Effective Date and are remade as of the Closing Date and shall not be deemed to be merged into or waived by the instrumentsof Closing, but shall survive the Closing. However, the representation of the zoning of the 3.58 Acres is a representation of the zoning at the time of Close of Escrow only and such representation shall not survive this Agreement. Each party agrees to defend and indemnify the other against any claim, liability, damage or expense asserted against or suffered by such other party arising out of the breach or inaccuracy of any such representation or warranty.

ARTICLE 7: DEFAULT AND REMEDIES

7.1 Default. If the transactions contemplated hereunder fail to close as a result of a party’s default, the non—defaultingparty shall be entitled to such remedies for breach of contract as may be available at law and/or in equity including, without limitation,the remedy of speci?c performance.
'

7.2 Notice of Default. Except for a party’s failure to close on the Closing Date, neither party shall have the right to declare a default by the other party and terminate this Agreement because of a failure by such other party to perform under the terms of this Agreement unless the other party shall fail to cure such failure to perform within ten (10) days after its receipt of written notice of such failure to perform.

7.3 Other Expenses. If this Agreement is terminated due to the default of a party, such defaulting party shall pay any fees due to Escrow Agent.

ARTICLE 8: DUE DILIGENCELASJS;RELEASE

8.1 Due Diligence Investigation. Hunter acknowledges that it has had an opportunity to conduct its due diligence investigation of the 3.58 Acres, and hereby approves the condition Acres is currently zoned medium-density residential and acknowledges that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as an entitlement to development under the current medium density residential zoning, and Hunter is responsiblefor obtaining all necessary development approvals from the City and any other agencies with jurisdiction over the Hunter Property.. The Agreement of Purchaseand Sale By and 7 Between theCity of St. Helena and DennisHunter Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2511 of 4422 ends

City acknowledgesthat it has had an opportunity to conduct its due diligence investigation of the Hunter Property, and hereby approves the condition andsuitabilityof the Hunter Property for the City’s purposes. The parties shall continue to operate and maintain their respective properties, prior to the Close of Escrow, in substantially the same manner that such were operated and maintainedas of the Effective Date.
(a) Hunter has reviewed a preliminary title report for the 3.58 Acres and approved all of the following exceptions to title: (a) standard printed exceptions in the preliminarytitle report; (b) general and special real property taxes and assessments constitutinga lien not yet due and payable; and (c) the title exceptionslisted on ExhibitI attached hereto. The City shall deliver title to the 3.58 Acres to Hunter at the Closing subject only to the foregoing approved exceptions.
(b) The City has reviewed a preliminary title report for the Hunter Property and approved all of the following exceptions to title: (a) standard printed exceptions in the preliminary title report; (b) general and special real property taxes and assessments constituting a lien not yet due and payable; and (c) the title exceptions listed on Exhibit 3 attached hereto.

Hunter shall deliver title to the Hunter Property to the City at the Closing subject only to the foregoing approved exceptions.

8.2 “As—Is”Sale. Each party hereby acknowledges and agrees that, neither the other party, nor anyone acting for or on behalf of such other party, has made any representations, warranties, or promises, concerning the condition of the properties or any other aspect of the properties. Each party further acknowledgesthat HE OR IT WILL BE ACQUIRINGTHE PROPERTIES, AS APPLICABLE, BASED UPON THEIR “AS—IS”CONDITIONAND THEIR

STATE OF REPAIR INCLUSIVE OF ALL FAULTS AND DEFECTS, WHETHER KNOWN

OR UNKNOWN, AS MAY EXIST AS OF THE CLOSE OF ESCROW, AND EACH PARTY

EXPRESSLY ASSUMES THE RISK THAT ADVERSE PHYSICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, FINANCIAL AND LEGAL CONDITIONSMAY NOT BE REVEALEDBY SUCH PARTY’S DUE DILIGENCE INVESTIGATION (IF ANY).

8.3 Disclaimer. Except for a breach of this Agreement, each party hereby fully and forever waives and disclaims, all warranties of whatever type or kind with respect to the property acquired by hin1or it, whether express, impliedor otherwise including, without limitation,those of ?tness for a particular purpose, tenantability, habitability or use.

8.4 Release and Waiver. Each party hereby fully and forever releases, acquitsand discharges the other party of and from, and hereby fully and forever waives any and all claims, actions, causes of action,suits, proceedings,demands,rights, damages, costs, expenses or other compensationwhatsoever, whether known or unknown, direct or indirect, foreseeable or unforeseeable, absolute or contingent (“Claims”), that such party now has or may have or which released in this Section 8.4 are not limited to matters which are known or disclosed and, with respect to the foregoing release, each party hereby waives any and all rights and benefits which he or it now has, or in the future may have, conferred upon him or it, by virtue of the provisions Agreement of Purchaseand Sale By and 8 Between the City of St. Helena and DennisHunter
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2512 of 4422 ends

of Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California (or any other statute or common law principles of similar effect), which Section provides as follows:

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS

WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT

TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF

EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM

OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR
HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

In this connection, each party acknowledges and agrees that it understands that factual matters relating directly to the properties now unknown to him or it may have given or may hereafter give rise to claimsthat are presently unknown, unanticipated and unsuspected, and such party further acknowledges and agrees that the releases herein have been negotiated and agreed upon in light of that realization and that it nevertheless intends to release, discharge and acquit the other party from any such unknown claims.

Hunter’s Initials: City’s Initials:

8.5 Delivery of Title Policy. At Hunter’s request, the Title Company shall deliver to Hunter an owner’s policy of title insurance issued by the Title Company as of the Closing Date, insuring Hunter as owner of fee simple title to the 3.58 Acres. At the City’s request, the Title Company shall deliver to the City an owner‘s policy of title insurance issued by the Title Company as of the Closing Date, insuring the City as owner of fee simple title to the Hunter Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Title Company’s delivery or willingnessto deliver the foregoing title policies shall not be a condition precedent to either party’s obligation to close hereunder. Each party shall pay the premium for their respective title policies.

ARTICLE 9: NOTICES

9.1 Notices. All notices required or permitted hereunder shall be in -writingand shall be served on the parties at the addresses set forth below. Any such noticesshall be either(a) sent by overnight delivery using a nationally recognized overnight courier, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered one business day after deposit with such courier, (b) sent by facsimile, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered upon transmission of such notice, or (0) Sent by personal delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered upon receipt. A party’s address may be changed by written notice to the other party; provided, however,that no notice of a change of address shall be effective until actual receipt of such notice. Copies of notices are for informational purposes only, and a failure to give or receive copies of any notice shall not be deemed a failure to give notice.

Dennis R. Hunter P. O. Box 9069 Santa Rosa, CA 95405
Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and 9 Between the City ofSt. Helena and DennisHunter Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2513 of 4422 ends

Telephone: (707)579-1007
Facsimile: (707) 5276151
With a copy to:

Clement,Fitzpatrick & Kenworthy
3333 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 200
Santa Rosa, California95403
Attn: Clayton E. Clement
Telephone: (707)523~l181
Facsimile: (707) 5464360
(13) 3
City of St. Helena
1480 Main Street
St. Helena, CA 94574
St. Helena, CA
Attn:City Manager
Telephone: (707) 967~2792
Facsimile: (707) 963-7748
With a copy to:

Miller Starr Regalia
Attn: Ethan Friedman
1331 North CaliforniaBoulevard, Fifth Floor
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 935-9400
Facsimile: (925)933-4126
(c) If to Title Company or Escrow Agent:

North Bay Title Company
431 E Street
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Attn: Sandy Veveiros
Telephone: (707)526-2000
Facsimile: (707) 526~4782

10.1 Parties Bound. This Agreement shall bind and shall inure to the bene?t of the City, Hunter and their respective successors and assigns. Notwithstandingthe foregoing, neither Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and 10 Between the City ofSt. Helena and DennisHunter
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2514 of 4422 ends

party may assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other, and any such prohibited assignment shall be void.

10.2 Headings. The article and paragraph headings of this Agreement are for convenience only and in no way limit or enlarge the scope or meaning of the language hereof.

10.3 Invalidity and Waiver. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid or inoperative, then so far as is reasonable and possible the remainder of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and operative, and, to the greatest extent legally possible, effect shall be given to the intent manifested by the portion held invalid or inoperative. The failure by either party to enforce against the other any term or provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such party’s right to enforce against the other party the same or any other such term or provision in the future.

10.4 Governing Law. This Agreement shall, in all respects, be governed, construed, applied, and enforced in accordance with the law of the State of California.

10.5 Survival. The provisions of this Agreement that contemplate performance after the Closing and the obligations of the parties not fully performed at the Closing shall survive the Closing and shall notbe deemed to be merged into or waived by the instrumentsof Closing.

10.6 No Third Pagy Bene?ciary. This Agreement is not intendedto give or confer any benefits, rights, privileges, claims, actions, or remedies to any person or entity as a third party bene?ciary, decree, or otherwise.

10.7 Entirety and Amendments. This Agreement, together with all exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein,embodiesthe entire agreement between the parties and supersede all prior agreements and understandings relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be amended or supplemented only by an instrumentin writing executed by the party against whom enforcement is sought.

10.8 Time. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

10.9 Attorneys’ Fees. Should either party employ attorneys to enforce any of the provisionshereof, the party against whom any final judgment is entered agrees to pay the prevailing party all reasonable costs, charges, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, expended or incurred in connectiontherewith.

10.10 Construction. The parties acknowledge that the parties and their counsel have reviewed and revised this Agreement and agree that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any exhibits or amendments hereto. any period of time described herein, the day of the act or event a?er which the designated period of time begins to run is not to be includedand the last day of the period so computed is to be included at, unless such last day is a Saturday, Sunday or legiil holiday for national banks in the Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and 11 Between theCity of'SI. Helena and Dennis Hunter
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2515 of 4422 ends

location where the properties are located, in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The last day of any period of time describedherein shall be deemed to end at 5:00 pm. Paci?c time.

10.12 Further Assurances. In addition to the acts and deeds recited herein and contemplatedto be performed, executed and/or delivered by either party at Closing, each party agrees to perform, execute and deliver, but without any obligation to incur any additional liability or expense, on or after the Closing any further deliveries and assurances as may be reasonably necessary to consummate the transactions contemplatedhereby or to further perfect the conveyance, transfer and assignment of the properties hereunder. l0.l3 Execution in Countemarts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemedto be an original, and all of such counterparts shall constitute one Agreement. To facilitate execution of this Agreement, the parties may execute and exchange by email or facsimile counterparts of the signature pages.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

Sag % 5 CITY or ST. HELENA
DennisR. Hunter
By: Ain/we
Name: Bert ohansson
Title: City Manager
A roved as to form:

Am .
/2 /xiv ,wz..x;./t./
alukevich,City Attorney
Agreement ofPurchase and Sale By and Between the City ofSt. Helena and Dennis Hunter HELE'\4S969\734l 10.8 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2516 of 4422 ends

EXHIBITA
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2517 of 4422 ends

Exhibit A
HunterProperty
Agreement of Purchaseand Sale By and Betweenthe City of St. Helenaand DennisHunter Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2518 of 4422 ends

City of St Helena
County of Napa HUNTER
101-1
Exhibit"A”
That certain real property situate in the Cityof St Helena, County of Napa, State of California being a portion of the lands described in the Grant Deed to Dennis R. Hunter recorded December 7. 2001.at Document No. 2001-0043130 OfficialRecords Napa County, said portion being more particularlydescribed as follows:

BEGINNINGat the southwestern corner ofsaid lands; thence along the general northwestern line of said lands N29°14’27"E, 944.57 feet; thence leaving last said line S60“!-i6‘20“E. 7983 feet; thence S47°O3'45”W, 97.46 feet; thence S29°14‘27"W, 851.75 feet to the southwestern line of said parcel; thence along iast said line N60°50’08"W, 50.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Containing 48,611 sq. ft. more or less.

All bearings, distances and coordinates described herein are based upon (NAD~83) California State Plane Coordinate System, Zone 2 (US. feet). Epoch 1991.35. Multiply distances described herein by 0.9999624? to obtain ground distances.

This real property description has been prepared by me or under my direction in conformance with the rofessional Land S -_=..:.

Q:\2OD4\0411076-PBQDSi Helena\DESCRlPTlONS ANDPLATS\101—1-rev.doc Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2519 of 4422 ends

—-PlAT9\1 01
Ldnda of
City of
Si. Hehand
9004\?4-11n7?1\nF-‘QCRIRTIUN
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2520 of 4422 ends

City of St Helena
County of Napa HUNTER
1012
Exhibit“A”
That certain real property situate in the City of St Helena, County of Napa, State of California being a portion of the lands described in the Grant Deed to Dennis R. Hunter recorded December 7, 2001, at Document No. 2001—O043130Of?oialRecords Napa County, said portion being more particularly described as follows:

COlillltilENCEtNGat the southwesterncorner ofsaid lands; thence along the general northwestern line of said lands N29°14’27"E, 944.57 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along last said line N29°14‘27"E, 8.06 feet; thence continuing along last said line N29°46’48”E, 835.20 feet to the northern line of said lands; thence along last said line S7‘l°07’20”E, 223.50 feet; thence leaving last said line S50°49’49"W, 264.81 feet; thence S32°22’33"W, 177.79 feet; thence S60°54’21"E, 10.02 feet; thence S32°22'33"W, 450.36 feet; thence N60°46’20”W_ 22.90 feet; thence S47°03’45"W, 10.50 feet; thence N60°46’20"W, 79.83 to the True Point of Beginning.

Containing 112,310 square feet, more or less.

All bearings, distances and coordinates described herein are based upon (NAD-83) California State Plane Coordinate System, Zone 2 (US. feet), Epoch 1991.35. Multiply distances described herein by 0.9999624? to obtain ground distances.

This real property description has been prepared by me or under my directionin conformanc with th
' ofessional Land Su - - Act.
.23922
:£—§§Pm£;!"‘
Q:\2004\O41 1076-PBQDSt Helena\DE8CRlPTl0NS ANDPLATS\101-2v.doc Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2521 of 4422 ends

.......\ ....
w
..
...—....\ .....-...-.....~.,,,.
.
\.

M
.
\\
...
xm
m
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2522 of 4422 ends

, 1 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2523 of 4422 ends

Exhibit B

1.20 Acres & 2.39 Acres
Agreementof Purchaseand Sale By and Betweenthe City of St. Helenaand DennisHunter Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2524 of 4422 ends

.\.:x:.m\.;¢w..\:.m\n Hrrvfe-1 Prszntbx I.a;u\.v»7V‘§dnv.-an n...-.,\.u-.:.-wane:-umeuv;.., k\ :1 ma . um. ___,____,_._.s_..,. . _..-_._ A
zmvwas _ ___
‘ '
‘.
,r
I
l
zo. 20»
cxqx
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2525 of 4422 ends

EXH|BiT C
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2526 of 4422 ends

Exhibit C

3.58 Acres
Agreement of Purchaseand Sale By and Between the City of St. Helenaand DennisHunter Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2527 of 4422 ends

City of St Helena
County of Napa City of St. Helena
102-2
Exhibit“A"
A portion of that certain real property situate inthe Cityof St Helena, County of Napa, State of Californiabeing a portion of ParcelOne described in the Grant Deed to the City of St Helena recorded March 15, 2005 at DocumentNo. 2005-0009620OfficialRecords Napa County, saidportion being more particularlydescribed as follows:

BEGINNINGat the southern most cornerof the above referenced Parcel One; thence along the general southwestern lineof said ParcelOne N60”46'20"W,234.68 feet; thence continuing along last said line S29°‘l3'40”W, 35.00 feet; thence continuing along last said line N71"O7'20"W,343.36feet; thence leaving last said line N41°18'58"E, 254.98 feet; thence N49°42‘50”E, 48.52 feet; thence N60"38‘24”E, 44.19 feet; thence S°29°32’38"E, 64.19 feet; thence SB4°21’35”E, 142.68feet; thence S78°16’37"E, 64.79 feet; thence S‘/'0°20’25”E, 86.57feet; thence S47"50'36"E,68.79 feet; thence sB2"05’04”E,77.73 feet to a point on the southeastern lineof said Parcel One; thence along last said lineS28°56’09"W, 279.89 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Containing 3.582 acres, more or less.

This real property description has been prepared by me or under my directionin conformancewiththe ProfessionalLandSu
- u...Act.
1 Q:\2(lO4\D411076-FBQDSt Halen3\DESCRlPTlONS ANDPLATS\Mlller-City of St. Helenadoc Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2528 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2529 of 4422 ends

Exhibit D
LotLine Adjustment
Agreement of Purchaseand Sale By and Between the City of SI.Helenaand DennisHunter Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2530 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2531 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2532 of 4422 ends

City of St Helena
County of Napa City of St. Helena
Exhibit “A”
Portionsof that certain real property situate in the City of St Helena, County of Napa, State ofCaliforniabeing a portion of Parcel One described inthe Grant Deed to the City of St Helena recorded March 15, 2005 at Document No. 2005-0009620OfficialRecords Napa County and a portion of the lands describedin the Grant Deed to Dennis R. Hunter recorded December 7, 2001, at DocumentNo. 2001-0043130OfficialRecords Napa County, said portions being more particularlydescribed as follows:

COMMENCINGat the southern most corner of the above referencedParcel One; thence ' along the southeastern line of said Parcel One N28°56'O9"E, 279.88 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence leaving last said line N62°05’04”W. 77.73 feet; thence N47°50’36" W, 68.79 feet; thence N70°20’25"W, 86.57 feet; thence N78°16'37"W, 64.79 feet; thence N84°21‘ 35”W, 142.68feet; thence N29°32'38"W, 64.19feet; thence S60°38'24'W, 44.19 feet; thence S49°42’50"W_ 48.52 feet; thence S41°18'58”W, 254.98 feet to the northern line ofthe above reference Lands of Dennis R. Hunter;thence along said northern line N71°07'20”W, 2.96 feet; thence leaving last said line S50°49'49”W, 264.81 feet; thence 832°22’33"W, 177.79 feet; thence S60°54’21 "E, 10.02 feet; thence S32°22’33"W, 450.36 feet; thence N60°46'20”W, 22.90 feet; thence S47 03’45"W, 107.96 feet; thence S29°14’27"W, 851.74 feet to the southwestern lineof the above referenced lands to Dennis R. Hunter;thence along the southwestern,northwestern and northeastern lines of said lands to DennisR. Hunter N60°50’08"W, 50.00 feet; thence N29°14’27" E, 952.64 feet; thence N29°46’48"E, 835.20 feet; thence S71“07’20"E,70.63 feet to the southwest corner of said Parcel One to City of St Helena;thence along the northwesternline of said Pa reel One N29°55’13"E, 1116.75feet moreor less to the center of the Napa River;thence along general northeastern lineofsaid Parcel One followingthe centerline of the Napa Riverand the meanderings thereofthe followingtwo courses S40"16'20"E, 501.27 feet; thence S84°46’20”E, 260.48 feet;thence along the southeastern line ofsaid Parcel One S28“56’09"W,642.51 feet to the True Point of Beginning.

Containing 15.691 acres, moreor less.

This real property description has been prepared by me or under mydirection in conformance with a
- ProfessionalLand 8 - .:..e Act. 4/ .

RegiteredProf
Q:\2004\0411076-PBQDSt Helena\DESCRiPTlONS ANDPLATS\Cityparcel post lot lineadj.doc Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2533 of 4422 ends

City of St Helena
County of Napa Dennis R. Hunter
Exhibit"A"
Portionsof that certain real property situate inthe City of St Helena, County of Napa, State of Californiabeing a portion of Parcel One described in the Grant Deed to the City of St Helena recorded March 15, 2005 at DocumentNo.2005-0009620OfficialRecords Napa County and a portion of the lands described in the Grant Deed to DennisR. Hunter recorded December 7, 2001.at DocumentNo.2001-0043130OfficialRecordsNapa County, said portions being more particularly described as follows:

COMMENCINGat the southwestern cornerof the above reference landsto DennisR. Hunter;thence aiong the southwestern lineof said lands S60°50’08”E_ 50.00feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence leaving last said line N29°'l4’27”E, 851.74 feet; thence N47"03’45"E,107.96feet; thence S60"46’20"E,22.90 feet; thence N32°22’33"E, 450.36 feet; thence N60"54’21"W,10.02 feet; thence N32°22’33"E, 177.79 feet; thence N50°49’49"E, 264.81feet to the general southwestern line of the above referenced Parcel One to the City of St Helena;thence along said general southwestern line S71°07'20"E, 2.96 feet; thence leaving last said line N4i°18’58”E, 254.98 feet; thence N49°42'50"E, 48.52 feet; thence N60°38'24”E, 44.19 feet; thence S29°32’38"E, 64.19 feet; thence S84°21’35"E, 142.68 feet; thence S78°16’37”E, 64.79 feet; thence S70°20’25"E, 86.57 feet; thence S47°50’36"E, 68.79 feet; thence S62°05’04”E, 77.73 feet to the southeastern line of said Parcel One to the City of St. Helena;thence along last said line S28°56'O9"W.279.88feet to the northeasterncornerofsaid landsto Dennis R. Hunter;thence along the general southeastern and southwesternlines of said lands to Dennis R. HunterN60°46'20"W, 234.63feet; thence S29°13'40"W, 1258.77 feet; thence N60°51’11"W, 449.33 feet; thence S29°36’59"W, 665.66feet; thence N60°50’08"W, 64.96 feet to the True Point of Beginning.

Containing 16.903 acres, more or less.

This real property description has been prepared by me or under mydirectionin conformance withthe ProfessionalLand Su
Date d Zz?ag
1 Q:\2004\0411076,-PBQDSt Helena\DESCRlPTlONS ANDPLATS\Hunter parcel post lotlineadj.doc Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2534 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2535 of 4422 ends

Exhibit E
ConstructionEasement
Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and 17
Between the City of St. Helena and Dennis Hunter
l<IELE\4S9(19\734H0.5
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2536 of 4422 ends

Recording requested by,
and when recorded return to:

Miller Starr Regalia
Attn: EthanFriedman
1331 North CaliforniaBoulevard, Fifth Floor
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONEASEMENT
THISTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONBASEMENT(the “EasementAgreement”) dated as of , 2008 is entered into by and between the City of St. Helena (the “Grantee”), and Dennis R. Hunter (“Grantor”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of that certain real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by thisreference, in the City of St. Helena,Napa County, California(the “Easement Property”).

WHEREAS, Grantee desires to perform certain work (the “Work”) on the Basement Property in connectionwith the St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Control Protection Project (the “Project”).

A WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant certain easements to Granteefor the purposes of performingthe Work on the Basement Property, on the terms and conditionsset forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, in considerationof the sum of One Dollar ($1 .00) and othergood and valuable consideration,paid by Grantee,the receiptand sufficiency ofwhichis herebyacknowledged by Grantor, Grantor hereby grants, bargains, sells and conveys to Grantee,itssuccessorsand assigns, full and free right and authority for a non~exclusive easement for the performance ofthe Work on the Easement Property.

It is mutually covenanted and agreed by and between the partieshereto as follows:

1. Construction Easement. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to Grantee, its expressly agree that the Construction Easementshall be temporary in nature. The Easementshall terminateon December 31, 2012.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2537 of 4422 ends

2. Ingress and Egress. Subject to the terms and provisionsset forth herein,Granteeshall have the right of ingress and egress in, to, over, through and across the BasementProperty for any purpose necessary or desirable for the full enjoyment of the rights granted to Grantee underthis Easement Agreement.

3. Covenants of Grantor.
(a) Grantor shall not interfere with the use of or obstruct the operation of or access to the Basement Property. Any structure or building locatedon the BasementProperty,or any grass, sod, shrubs,woody plants, other crops, trees or nursery stock locatedon the Easement Property which interfereswith the use of or obstructsthe operationof or access to the BasementPropertymay be removed by Grantee without liability for damages arisingtherefrom. (b) Grantor covenants and agrees to remain fully liable and shall pay before delinquency all real estate taxes and assessments on the BasementProperty.

4. Covenants of Grantee. Grantee represents, covenants, and warrants in favor of Grantor and its successors and assigns, as follows:
(a) Neither Grantee nor any licensee, agent, employee or independentcontractor of Grantee (collectively, the “Grantee Parties") shall do or fail to do anything which could cause any charge, lien or encumbrance, including but not limited to any laborer's,rnechanids, vendor's, supplier's or materialman'slien, to attach to or otherwise encumber any part or all of the Basement Property and Grantee, at its sole cost and expense, shall immediately pay, discharge or otherwise cause to be removed any and all such charges, liens, and encumbrances. (b) Grantee agrees to indemnify,defend andhold harmlessthe EasementProperty and Grantor, and any successors and assigns ofGrantor, from any costs, expenses, damages, claims or demands incurred or asserted against Grautor to the extent arising out of the activities or omissions of Grantee and/or the GranteeParties in the performance of the Work and/or use of the Easement Property, except those due to (i) hazardousmaterialsor conditionsthat are not (X)caused or (y) placed on the Basement Property or the adjacent lands of Grantor by Grantee or the Grantee Parties, (ii) latent defects on the EasementProperty not related to Grantee’sor the Grantee Parties‘ activitiesthereon, or (iii) the actions or omissionsof Grantor, its directors,officers,members,agents or employees.

5. Binding Effect. The ConstructionBasement and the provisions of this Easement Agreement shall be covenants
successors and assigns and all future owners and lessees of any part or allof the BasementProperty.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2538 of 4422 ends

6. Governing Law. This Easement Agreement shall be governed and controlled as to validity, construction,interpretation,effect, enforcement and in all otherrespects by the statutes and the decisionsof the courts of the State of California.

7. Amendment. ThisEasement Agreement may not be amended or modi?ed except in a writing executed by both Grantor and Grantee.

8. Severability. The provisionsofthis Easement Agreement are separate andseverable.

If any provisionof this Easement Agreement is held to be invalid, unenforceable, illegal or in conflict with any law, that provision shall be severed from this Easement Agreement and the remainder of this Easement Agreement shall not be impaired or otherwise affected by such severance, shall be construed, interpretedand enforced as if it did not contain such provision and shall remain in full force and effect.

9. Attomeys' Fees. If any actionor proceeding isinstitutedto (i) enforce or interpret any provision of this Easement Agreement or (ii) as a result of the breach by a party to any of the terms hereof, then the prevailing party therein shall be entitledto recover its attorneys’ fees and costs from the losing party.

10. Further Assurances. Each of the parties shall execute and deliver any and all additional papers, documents, and other assurances, and shall do any and all acts and things reasonably necessary in connection withthe performance of their obligations hereunderand to cany out the intent of this Easement Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this EasementAgreement the day and year first written above.

GRANTOR: GRANTEE:

CITY OF ST. HELENA
DennisR. Hunter
By:

Name: BertJohansson
Title: CityManager
Approved asto form:

Amy L. Valukevich,City Attorney
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2539 of 4422 ends

City of St Helena
County of Napa HUNTER
101-4,101-5, 101-6
Exhibit “A"
Parcel 101-4
A variable width Temporary ConstructionEasement over upon and across that certain real property situate in the City of St Helena, County of Napa, State of California being a portion of the lands described in the Grant Deed to Dennis R. Hunter recorded December 7, 2001, at Document No. 2001-0043130 OfficialRecords Napa County, said Temporary Easement being more particularly described as follows:

COMMENCINGat the northwestern comer of said lands; thence along the northeastern line of said lands S71"07’20"E, 223.50 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along last said line S71°O7’20"E, 17.68 feet; thence leaving last said line S50"49'49"W, 271.73 feet; thenceS29"15’50‘W, 184.20feet; thence S32“22’33“W, 425.36 feet; thence N60°46’20"W, 15.02 feet; thence N82"22’33"E,435.34 feet; thence N60"54'21"W, 10.02 feet; thence N32°22’33"E, 177.79 feet; thence N50"49'49“E,264.81 feet to the True Point of Beginning
Containing 14,019 square feet, more or less.

Parcel 101-5
A 10 foot wide Temporary Construction Easement over upon and across that certain real property situate in the City of St Helena, County of Napa, State of Californiabeing a portion of the lands described in the Grant Deed to Dennis R. Hunterrecorded December 7, 2001, at DocumentNo. 2001-0043130 Of?cial Records Napa County, said Temporary Easement being more particularly described as follows:

COMMENCINGat the northeastern corner of said lands; thence along the general southeastern line of said lands S29°'l3'40”W, 910.60’ feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along last said line S29°13'40"W. 10.00feet; thence leaving last said line N60“46’20"W,446.80 feet; thence N32°22’33”E, 10.02 feet; thence 860°46'20" E, 446.25 feet to the True point of Beginning. ’
Containing 4,465 square feet. more or less.

Parcel 101-6
A 10 foot wide Temporary ConstructionEasement over upon and across that certain real December 7, 2001, at Document No. 2001-0043130 Official Records Napa County, said Temporary Easement being more particularly described as follows: Q:\2004\0411076-PBQDSt He|ena\DESCRlPTlONS ANDPLATS\TCE101-4, 5 AND6.d0c Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2540 of 4422 ends

City of St Helena
County of Napa HUNTER
101-4, 101-5,'i0'1~6
COMMENCINGat the northeastern corner of said lands; thence along the general southeastern line of said lands S29°13'40"W, 935.60‘ feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along last said line S29°13’40"W. 10.00 feet; thence leaving last said line N60"46‘20"W. 488.76 feet; thence N47"03‘45"E,10.50 feet; thence S80°46"20” E, 485.55 feet to the True point of Beginning.

Containing 4,872 square feet, more or less.

All bearings. distances and coordinates described herein are based upon (N/-\D—83) California State Plane Coordinate System, Zone 2 (U.S. feet). Epoch 1991.35. Multiply distances described herein by 0.9999624? to obtain ground distances.

This real property description has been prepared by me or under my direction in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act.

44.. .44.. Registered Profesi
Q:\2004\O4‘l1076-PBQDSt Helena\DESCRlPTlONSANDPLATS\TCE101-4, 5 AND6.doc Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2541 of 4422 ends

9nnA\n411n7R1\hF<Z(TRlRTInN~PlATQ\1?1
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2542 of 4422 ends

STATEOFCAKEORNDR
S&
\./\/&/

COUNTYOF
On , 2008 before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , who
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal.

Notary Public
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2543 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2544 of 4422 ends

Exhibit F
UtilityEasement
Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and Between the City of St. Helenaand Dennis 1-Iumer HELE\45969\734110.5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2545 of 4422 ends

Recording requested by,
and when recorded return to:

Miller Starr Regalia
Attn: Ethan Friedman
1331 North CaliforniaBoulevard, Fifth Floor
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Easement Agreement”) dated as of , 2008 is entered into by and between the City of St. Helena (the “Grantee”), and Dennis R. Hunter (“Grantor”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of that certain real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporatedherein by this reference, in the City of St. Helena, Napa County, California(the “Easement Property”).

WHEREAS,Grantee desires to install and maintain certainutilityfacilities(the “Work”) on the Easement Property in connection with the St. Helena ComprehensiveFlood Control Protection Project (the “Project”).

WHEREAS, Grantee and Grantor have entered into a Agreement of Purchase and Sale of even date herewith pursuant to which Grantee will acquire from Grantor certain real property (“Grantee’s Property”) in the vicinity of the Easement Property for purposes of the Project.

WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant. certain easements to Grantee for the purposes of performingthe Work on the BasementProperty, on the terms and conditionsset forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, in considerationof the sum of One Dollar ($1 .00) and other good and valuable consideration,paid by Grantee,the receiptand su?iciency ofwhichis hereby acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor hereby grants, bargains,sells and conveys to Grantee,its successorsand assigns, full andfree right and authority for a non—exc1usiveeasement forthe performance of the Work on the Basement Property.

1. Utility Easement. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to Grantee, its successors, assigns, and agents a non~exclusive,perpetual easement (the “Utility Easement”) over, under, across, above and through the Easement Property for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating,using, maintaining, repairing,and replacing utilityfacilities,linesor connectionsand any Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2546 of 4422 ends

uses incidentalthereto. The Utility Easement is appurtenant to and for the bene?t of the Grantee’s Property and constitutes a servitudeon the Basement Property. '

2. lngress and Egress. Subject to the terms and provisions set forth herein, Grantee shall have the right of ingress and egress in, to, over, through and across the Easement Property for any purpose necessary or desirable for the full enjoyment of the rights granted to Grantee under this Easement Agreement.

3. Covenants of Grantor.
(a) Grantor shall not interfere with the use of or obstruct the operation of or access to the Basement Property. Any structure or buildinglocated on the Basement Property, or any grass, sod, shrubs, woody plants, other crops, trees or nursery stocklocated on the Easement Property which interfereswith the use of or obstructs the operationof or access to theBasementPropertymay be removed by Grantee without liability for damages arising therefrom. (b) Grantor covenants and agrees to remain fully liable and shall pay before delinquency all real estate taxes and assessments on the Basement Property.

4. Covenants of Grantee. Grantee represents, covenants, and warrants in favor of Grantor and its successors and assigns, as follows:
(a) Neither Grantee nor any licensee, agent, employee or independentcontractor of Grantee (collectively, the "Grantee Parties") shall do or fail to do anything which could cause any charge, lien or encumbrance, including but not limited to any laborers,mechanic's, vendor's, supplier's or materialrnarrslien, to attach to or otherwise encumber any part or all of the Basement Property and Grantee, at its sole cost and expense, shall immediately pay, discharge or otherwise cause to be removed any and all such charges, liens, and encumbrances. (b) Grantee agreesto indemnify, defend and hold harmlessthe BasementProperty and Grantor, and any successors and assigns of Grantor, from any costs, expenses, damages, claims or demands incurred or asserted against Grantor to the extent arising out of the activities or omissions of Grantee and/or the Grantee Partiesin the performance of the Work and/or use of the Basement Property, except those due to (i) hazardous materials or conditionsthat are not (X)caused or (y) placedon the Basement Property or the adjacentlands of Grantor by Grantee or the Grantee Parties, (ii) latent defects on the Basement Property not related to Grantee’sor the Grantee Parties‘ activitiesthereon, or (iii) the actionsor omissionsof Grantor, its directors,officers,members,agents

5. Binding The UtilityBasement and the provisions of thisEasementAgreement shall be covenants upon and shall run with the BasementProperty. ThisEasementAgreementshall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Grantor and Grantee, theirrespective successors and assigns and all ?xtureowners and lessees of any part or all of the BasementProperty.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2547 of 4422 ends

6. Governing Law. This Easement Agreement shall be governed and controlled as to validity, construction,interpretation,effect, enforcement and in all other respects by the statutes and the decisionsof the courts of the State of California.

7. Amendment. ThisEasement Agreementmay not be amended or modi?ed except in a writing executed by both Grantor and Grantee.

8. Severability. The provisions of this EasementAgreement are separate and severable.

If any provision of this Easement Agreement is held to be invalid, unenforceable, illegal or in conflict with any law, that provision shall be severed from this Easement Agreement and the remainder of this Easement Agreement shall not be impaired or otherwise affected by such severance, shall be construed, interpretedand enforced as if it did not contain such provision and shall remain in full force and effect.

9. Attorneys‘ Fees. If any actionor proceeding isinstitutedto (i) enforce or interpretany provisionof this Easement Agreement or (ii) as a result of the breach by a party to any of the terms hereof, then the prevailing party thereinshallbe entitledto recover its attorneys‘ fees and costs from the losing party.

10. Further Assurances. Each of the parties shall execute and deliver any and all additional papers, documents, and other assurances, and shall do any and all acts and things reasonably necessary in connection with the performance oftheir obligations hereunder and to carry out the intent of this Easement Agreement.
~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this EasementAgreement the day and year first written above.

GRANTOR: GRANTEE:

CITY OF ST. HELENA
Dennis R. Hunter
By:

Name: BertJohansson
Title: CityManager
Approved as to form:

Amy L. Valukevich,City Attorney
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2548 of 4422 ends

City of St Helena
County of Napa HUNTER
101-3
Exhibit"A"
A UtilityEasement over upon and across that certain real property situate in the City of St Helena, County of Napa, State of Californiabeing a portion of the lands described in the Grant Deed to Dennis R. Hunter recorded December 7, 2001.at Document No. 20010043130 OfficialRecords Napa County, said Easement being more particularly described as foliowsz COMMENCINGat the northeastern comer of said lands; thence along the general southeastern line ofsaid lands S29°13’40’W, 920.60 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along last said line S29°13'40"W, 15.00 feet; thence leaving last said line N60°48'20"W, 462.65 feet; thence N32°22’33“ E, 15.02 feet; thence S60°46’20”E, 461 .82 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Containing 6,934 square feet, more or less.

All bearings, distances and coordinates described herein are based upon (NAD-83) California State Plane Coordinate System, Zone 2 (US. feet), Epoch 1991.35. Multiply distances described herein by 0.9999624? to obtain ground distances.

This real property description has been prepared by me or under my direction in conformance with the Professional Land Su -;--:._
Registered Profese//tonal Engineer
Date 9752224»;
Q2\20D4\041‘lO76-PBQD St Helena\DESCRlPTlONS ANDPLATS\101-3.doc Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2549 of 4422 ends

L0l\-S1.\2"lc¥-NOLLB|&;IC)S3C}\L9l.OH17O\170OZ,
rw==IsHwe
+0 M13
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2550 of 4422 ends

STATEOFCALFORNDX _)
\./
SS.

COUNTY OF )
On , 2008 before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared
, who
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrumentI certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and Correct.

Witness my hand and official seal.

Notary Public
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2551 of 4422 ends

,,_........”
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2552 of 4422 ends

Exhibit C
Soilstockpile GradingPlan
Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and Between (he City of St. Helena and Dennis Hunter HELE\é5969\734l l0.5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2553 of 4422 ends

.n;,,¢
‘... . ...u m. -xs:« ,.
\q,¢g.q\:¢;;q;\|.;n\c1m\71 ?uyv mu w..m >..,.u\-..\r.,~m\u.,... mm.\u.= :5 cut) -.... a t. v u M A
J
v »\
K
in
m
.‘
/
W2./,1: 1)
.
,y,,,,/
4 /.
x
zo.
..
max onx
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2554 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2555 of 4422 ends

Exhibit H
Water LineRelocation
Agreement of Purchaseand Sale By and Between the City of St. Helena and DennisHunter HELE\4S969\734l 10.5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2556 of 4422 ends

\_,_.
.\u:m<&\uoox\vm\um\s\ »... 11...: mwo. :....m-ww..\~-~.« u....«.\-m:..=.v.u.~.....m... -m:.wu-. -Lg pi. Ian:~ -.w.~
3/\V HBVLS
m
K
>zo
mm
’n
,
/1
3/
1 L
:.

20. 20.
x 9. x
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2557 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2558 of 4422 ends

Exhibit I
Approved Title Exceptions(3.58 Acres)
Agreement of Purchaseand Sale By and Between the City of St. Helena and Dennis Hunter HELE\45969\734l10.5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2559 of 4422 ends

First AmecanTitle
CompanyofNapa
ORDERNO:T0011053-

PRELIMINARYREPORT

FIRST AMERICANTITLEINSURANCECOMPANY
FirstAmericanTitle CompanyofNapa
1700Second Street, Suite 120,P. O. Box 388
Napa, CA 94559
Phone: (707)2544500 Fax: (707)226-9346
Prop érty Address: Direct Title Inquiriesto: 009-030-005 MitchellGlotzer St. Helena,California E-mail:[email protected] Assessor’s Parcel Number: Phone: (707)254 4500 009-030-005 Seller‘/Owner:

City of St. Helena
considered. It is important to notelthat this preliminary report is not a Writt condition of title and may not list all liens,defects,and encumbrancgsaffectingtitle to the land.

Dated as ofluly 17, 2008 at 7:30 A. M. By: Authorized Signatory

Page 1 ends
Page 2560 of 4422 ends

first American Title
CompanyofNapa
ORDERNO: T0011053~
The form of policy of title insurancecontemplatedby thisreport is:
' ALTAOwner'sPolicy (6/17/06) with RegionalExceptions(StandardCoverage) Title to said estate or interestat the datehereofis vested in:

CITY OF ST. HELENA, A MUNICIPALCORPORATION
The estate or interestin the land hereinafterdescribedor referredto coveredby thisreport is:

A FEE
At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in additionto the printed exceptions and exclusionscontainedin said policy form would be as follows:

1. General and special taxes and assessments for the ?scal year 2008-09,a lien not yet due or payable.

2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter3.5 commencingwithSection75 ofthe California Revenueand Taxation Code.

3. Any easement for water course over that portion of said land lyingwithinNapaRiver, rights, interestsand easements in favor of thepublic whichexist, or are claimedto ex said land covered by water. together with any
ist, over any portion of

4. The terms and provisions containedin the documententitled"Deed"recordedDecember12, 1901as Book71 of Deeds at page 278 of OfficialRecords. page169 of OfficialRecords.

6. The terms and provisions containedin the documententitled"Grantof StormDrainEasement"recordedMay 28, 1993 as SeriesNumber 1993016818of OfficialRecords. - - Page 2
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2561 of 4422 ends

Northerncomer thereof;thenceSouth 28° West along theNorthwest P.‘1'1'st American Title
Company ofNapa
ORDERNO: T001105?»-

LEGALDESCRIPTION
The land referredto m tlusreport is situatedm theCztyof St Helena,County of Napa, State of Cahforma,and 1s describedas follows:

East265.6 feetto the intersection thereof withthe Southeasternline of the landsformerlyof D. 0. Hunt;thence South28° West alongsaid Southeastern line 924.5 feet to the most Easterncomer of the 1-2/3 acre tract of the Town of St. Helenaabove referredto; thenceNorth62° West alongthe Northeasternline of said 1-2/3 acre tract 2346 feetto themost em line thereof,35 feetto the point of commencement.

APN 009-030-O05
facilitiesfor the transmissionof public uhhty services,as granted ' Robert Hartley, et ux, recorded January15 1946in Book236 at describedasfollows:
abovedescribed;thence South28° 41'33" West along said Northwesternline46.4 feet;thenceNorth68° 46‘15"West71.37feet, moreor less, to the Southeasternline of the 15.5 acre tmct of landconveyed to Percy V North 60° 45‘West 537.3feetto the point of commencement. , SaidNapaCountyRecords,and in Book Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2562 of 4422 ends

First AmectmTitle
CompanyofNapa
ORDERN0: T0011053-
iron pipe monument; thenceNorth28° 48'East 16.5feet;thence North60° 45‘Wesi: 463.7 feet;thenceSouth 28° 45‘West 16.5feet; and thence South 60° 45‘ East 25.0 feet to the pointof commencement.

WARNING
The Map attachedheretomay or may not be a survey of the landdepicted thereon.You shouldnot rely upon it for any purpose otherthan orientationto the general locationof the parcel or parcels depicted. First American expressly disclaimsany liabilityfor alleged loss or damagewhichmay result fromrelianceupon suchmap.

Page 4 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2563 of 4422 ends

First AmicanTitle
CompanyofNapu
ORDERNO:T00110S3-
Information Notes:
- a. General and special taxes and assessments for the ?scal year 2007-08. First Installment : $0.00 Second Installment : $0.00
Tax Rate Area : 3000
A. P. No. : 009-030-005

13. The Assessor’sParcelNumber(s),if any, containedin the legal descriptionherein,are for quick identi?cation purposes only, and are not a part of the actual legal descriptions. d. The CountyRecordermay charge an additional$20.00recordi Change of OwnershipReport" Form,for each Deedto be rec completingand signingthis form. ng fee,if not provided witha “Preliminary orded.The purchaser isresponsible for Lenders Supplemental Report:
g, According to the public records,there hasbeenno conveyance of the landWithina period of two years prior to the date of thisreport, except as follows:

NONE
esn
em
2cc: COOMBS& DUNLAPLLP, 1211DivisionSt,Napa,CA94559
~ Ar_nyValukevich

Page 5 ends
Page 2564 of 4422 ends

ioanaa No: T0011053- Form No. 1068-1(Rev. 06/17/06)
The following matters are express]
expenses whicharise by reason of:

1. 3.

EXHIBITA LIST OF PRINTEDEXCEPTIONSANDEXCLUSIONS(By Policy Type)

1. CALIFORNIA LANDTITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARDcovmmcnpoucy — x990 y excludedfrom the coverageof this policyand theCompany willnot pay loss or damage,costs, attorneys‘ fees or (a) Any law, ordinanceor governmental regulation (includingbut restricting, regulating, prohibitingor relating (i) the occupant: ,use, or enjoymentof the land; (ii) the character,dimensionsor location of any improvement new or hereaftererected on the land; (iii) '
' land or any parcel of which the land is or wasit part; or (iv) environmental (:1) whether or not recorded in the public records at Dateof Policy,but created, suliered, assumed or agreed to by the insuredclaimant; (b) 110‘MOW"10“*9 C0mP’m)’» Mt recorded in the public records at Date ofPolicy, but knownto the insured claimantand not disclosedin writingto the Company by the insured claimantprior to the date the insuredclaimantbecamean insured under this policy; (2) resulting in no loss or damage to the insuredclaimant; (d) attaching or created subsequentto Date of Policy;or (e) resulting in lossor damage whichwould not have beensustainedifthé Insuredclaimanthad paid value for the insuredmortgage or for the estate or interest insuredby this policy.

Unenforcenbilityof the lien of the insuredmortgage becauseof the inabilityor failureof the insuredat Date of Policy, {allure of any subsequent owner ofthe indebtedness, to comply with the a situated. 9 0”m¢|’e5f insured by this policy or the transactioncreating the rationof federalbankruptcy,state insolvencyor similarcreditm-5'rights laws, Proceedings by a public agencywhich may result in taxes or assessments, or noticesof such proceedings,whetheror not shown by the records ofsuch agencyor by the public records.

Any facts, rights, interests,or claimswhichare not shown by Easements,liensor cncnmbrances.or claimsthereof‘,whichare not shownby the public records. Page 1 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2565 of 4422 ends

4. Discrepancies, conflictsin boundary lines,shortage in area, encroachments,or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose,and which are not shownby the public records.

5. (a) Unpatented mining claim; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuancethereof- or title towater. whether or not the matters excep , (c) water rights, claims ted under (9.),(b) or (c) are shownby the public records.

2. CLTA HOMEOWNi<.‘.R'S POLICYOF TITLE INSURANCE(10/22/03) ALTA I-lOMEOVVNER'S POLICYOF TITLE INSURANCE

EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptionsin ScheduleB, You are not insuredagainst loss, costs, attorneys‘ fees,and expenses resulting from:

I. Governmentalpolice power, and the existence or violationof any law or governmentregulation. This includesordinances, laws and regulations concerning:
building
zoning
Land use
8b
c. d. improvements on the Land
a Land division
f environmentalprotection
This Exclusion does not apply to violationsor the enforcementofthese matters if notice of the violationor enforcementappears in the Public Records at the PolicyDate.

This Exclusion does not limit the coveragedescribedin CoveredRisk14.15,16,17 or 24.

2. The failure ofYour existing structures, or any part ufthem, to be const does not apply to violationsofbuildingcodes ifnotlce ofthe violationa 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
a. a notice ofexercising the right appears in the PublicRecords at the PolicyDate; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You ll'You bought the Land withoutKnowingofthe taking. 4 Risks‘ a that are created, allowed,or agreed to by You,whether or not they appear in the PublicRecord b. that are Known to You at the PolicyDate,but not to Us,unlessthey appear in the PublicRecordsat the PolicyDate; c that result in no loss to You; or d

6. Lack ofa right:
a. to any Land outside the area speci?cally describedand r cferred to in paragraph 3 ofScheduleA; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.

This Exclusion does not limit the coverage describedin CoveredRisk 11or 18.

LIMITATIONSON COVEREDRISKS
Your insure nce for the followingCoveredRisksis limitedon the 0wner’sCoverageStatement as follows:

For Covered Risk 14.15, 16 and 18, Your DeductibleAmountand Our MaximumDollarLimit ofLlebilityshownin scheduleA,

Page 2 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2566 of 4422 ends

I A
The deductible amounts and maximum dollarlimitsshown on ScheduleA sureas follows:

Your DeductibleAmount Our MaximumDollarLimitot‘Liabiligy Covered Risk-.14: 1% of PolicyAmountor 5 2,500 8 10,000 (Subdivision LawViolation) (whichever is less) ’ Covered Risk 15: 1% of PolicyAmountor 5 5,000 5 25,000 (Building Permit) (whichever is less) Covered Risk 16: 1% of PolicyAmount or 5 5,000 5 25,000 (Zoning) (whichever is less) Covered Risk I8: 1% of Policy Amount or 3 2,500 8 5,000 (Encroachment ol?oundsry Wells or Fences) (whichever is less)

3. AMERICANLANDTITLE ASSOCIATION
RESIDENTIALTITLEINSURANCEPOLICY (6—i-87)

EXCLUSIONS
in addition to the Exceptionsin ScheduleB, you are not insuredagainst loss,costs, attorneys’ fees,and expenses resulting from:

I. Governmentalpolice power, and the existent:e or violationof any law or government regulation. This include; buildingand zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning:
land use I
0 improvements on the land
- land division
I environmentalprotection
This exclusiondoes not apply to violationsor the enforcementof these matters whichappear inthe public records at PolicyDate.

This exclusion does not limitthe zoning coveragedescribedin items 12 and 13 ofCoveredTitle Risks.

2. The right to take the land by condemningit, unless:
- a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records - on the PolicyDate
the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you ifyou bought the land withoutknowingofthe taking

3. Title Risks:
thnt are created, allowed, or agreed to by you
that are knownto you, but not to u
C
-= s, on the PolicyDate —~ unlessthey appeared in the public records c that result in no loss to you
I that iirst affect your title errorthe Policy Date - this does not limitthe labor and material liencoverageInItem 3 of CoveredTitleRisks 4. Failure to pay valuefor your title.

5. Lack oi‘: right:
c to any land outside the area s OR
o in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land pecilicnily describedand referred to in item 3 oi‘Schedule A This exclusion does not limit the access coveragein Item 5 of CoveredTitle Risks.

4. AMERICA_NLANDTITLEASSOCIATIONLOAN POLICY(IIH7-92) WITHALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORM]COVERAGE

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
governmental regulation (includingbut not limitedto buildingand zonin restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on t (b) Any governmental police power not excludedb Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2567 of 4422 ends

This policy doesnot insure against lossor damage(and the Companywill not pay costs,

1. u
Defects, liens,encumbrances,adverse claimsor other matters:
(a) created, su?ered, assumed or agreed to by the insuredclaimant; (b) not knownto the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,isut knownto the insuredclaimantand not disclosedin writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured ciaiment becamean insuredunder this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent that this mortgage over any statutory lien for services,labor or material or to the extentl improvements under construction or completed at Detect‘ Policy); or invalidity or unenforceubilityof the lien ofthe insured mortgage, or claim thereof,which arises out ofthe transactionevidencedby the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumercredit protection or truth in lending law.

Any claim.whicharises out of the transaction creating the interestof the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reasononhe upera?on of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors‘ rights laws, that is based on:
(I) the transaction creating the interestof the insuredmortgagee being deemed a fraudulentconveyanceor fraudulentgmnsfer; or (ii} the snbordinattonofthe interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrineor equitable subordination (iii) the transaction creating

EXCEFHONSFROMCOVERAGE
m01‘|'|elv'S'feesor expenses) whicharise by reasonof:

Taxes or assessments which are not shownas existingliens by the records of any taxingauthority that leviestaxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.

Any facts,rights, interests,or claims which are not shownby the ‘ inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shownby the public records.

Discrepancies,conflicts in boundarylines,shortagein area, encroachments,or any otherfacts which a correct survey would disclose,and which are not shown by the public records.

Any lien,or right to a lien,for services, labor or material therctoforeor hereafterfurnished,imposedby law and not shown by the public records. . Page 4
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2568 of 4422 ends

5. 2006ALTA LOANPOLICY (06-17-D6)
EXCLUS!0NSFROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay lossor damage, costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:

1. (a) Any law, ordinance,permit, or governmental regulation (includingthose relating to buildingand zoning) restricting,regulating. prohibiting,or relating to (i) the occupancy,useor enjoyment oi‘the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions,or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivisionof land; or (iv) environmentalprotection;
or the eitect of any violationof these laws,ordinances,or governmental regulations. ThisExclusion1(a) does not modifyor limitthe coverage provided under CoveredRisk 5.‘ (b) Any governmental police power, This Exclusion1(b) does not modify or limitthe coverageprovided under Covered Risk 6.‘ Rights of eminentdomain. This Exclusiondoes not modify or limit the coverageprovided under CoveredRisk’!or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims,or other matters (3) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; . . (b) not Knownto the Company,not recordedin the Public Recordsat Date ol'Palicy,‘ in writing to the Companyby the InsuredClaimantprior to the date the Insured (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the InsuredClaimant; (d) attaching or ‘createdsubsequent to Date ol’Policy(however, this does not modify or limitthe coverageprovided under Covered Risk1I, 13, or 14); or _
part ofthe lienofthe Insured Mortgagethat arises out of the trans): ction evidencedby the or any consumercredit protection or truth-in—lendlnglaw.

6. Any claim,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors’rights laws,that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage,is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(1))of this policy.

Wand created or attaching betweenDateof Policyand
the date of recording of the Insured Mortgagein the PublicRecords.ThisExclusiondoesnot modify or limitthe coverageprovided under Covered Risk I 10:).

3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrancesthat are not shown by the PublicRecords.

4. Any encroachment, encumbrance,violation,
‘ conflicts in boundary lines,shortage in area, or 5. Unpatented mining claims;reservations or exception in patents or in acts authorizingthe lssuancethereof; claims or title to water. a water rights, 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services,labor or material theretoforeor hereafterfurnished,imposedby law and not shown by the PublicRecords. Page 5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2569 of 4422 ends

The following matters are express!
expenses which arise by reason oi’:
i.

This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Companywill not pay costs, attorneys‘

2. 6. AMERICANLANDTITLEASSOCIATIONOWNER'SPOLICY(10-17-92)

EXCLUSIONSFROM COVERAGE
y excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Companywill not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys’ feesor (a) Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to buildingand zoning laws, ordinances,or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,use, or enjoymentof the land; (ii) the character, dimensionsor location of any improvement now or hereaftererected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a changein the dimensionsor area of the land or any parcel ofwhich the land is or was:1 part; (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extentthat a notice public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding
from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy whichwould be bindingon the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge.

Defects, liens,encumbrances,adverse claimsor other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insuredclaimant; (b) not knownto the Company, not recorded in the public recordsatyDateof Policy, > but knownto the insured claimant and not disclosedin writing to the Company by the insured claimantprior to the datethe insuredclaimant becamean insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no lossor damage to theinsured claimant; (ii) attaching or created subsequent to Date of §‘olicy; or (e) resulting in loss or dame
by this policy.

Any claim, which arises out oi‘the transaction vesting in the insuredthe estate or inter-est insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy. state insolvency,or similar creditors‘rights laws, that is basedon:
(2) the transaction creating the estate or interestinsuredby this policy being deemeda fraudulentconveyanceor fraudulent transfer; or

EXCEPTIONSFROM COVERAGE
feesor expenses) whicharise by reasonof:

Taxes or assessments which are not shownas existing liens by the records of any taxingauthority that leviestaxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.

Any facts, rights, interests, or claimswhich are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.

Easements, claims of easement or encumbranceswhich are not shownby the public records, correct which are not shown by the public records. Unpatented mining claims,reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizingthe issuancethereof, water rights, claims or title to water. Any lien, or right to a lien,for services,labor or material tberetoforeor hereafterfurnished,imposedby law and not shown by the public records. Page 6 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2570 of 4422 ends

7. 2006 ALTA OWNER’SPOLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONSFROM COVERAGE* The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverageof thispolicy, and the Companywillnot pay lossor damage,costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reasonof:

1. (a) Any law, ordinance,permit, or prohibiting, or relatingto (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character.dimensions,or locationoi‘any improvement erected on the Land: (ill) the subdivisionof land; or (iv) environmentaiprotecrlon;
governmental regulation ?ncluding those relating to buildingand zoning) restricting, regulating, 30 Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusiondoes not modify or limitthe coverage provided under CoveredRisk 7 or 8.

3. Defects, liens, encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the InsuredClaimant; (b) not Knownto the Company,not recorded in the Public Recordsat Date ot‘Polic d Claimant becamean Insuredunder this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subse and I0); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not havebeensustainedifthe InsuredClaimant had paid value for the Title.

4. Any claim, by reason of the operation offeder
Title as shownin ScheduleA, is
(3) a fraudulent conveyanceor fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in CoveredRisk 9 of this policy. at bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors’ rights laws,that the transaction vestingthe existing liens by the records of any taxing an
‘Records.
: 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claimsthat are not shown by the PublicRecords but tha t could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession of the Land.

3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrancesthat are not shown by the Public Records.

4. Any encroachment,encumbrance,violation,
' conflictsin boundarylines,shortage in area, or any other facts that would be disclosedby an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, and that are notshownin the PublicRecords. claims or title to water.

6. Any lien, or right to a Page 7
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2571 of 4422 ends

The following matters are expressl
expenses whicharise by reason of:

I,
to

7. 9.

8. ALTA EX.PAN'DEDCOVERAGERESIDENTIALLOANPOLICY(10/13/01)

EXCLUSIONSFROM COVERAGE
y excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Companywillnot pay lossor damage,costs,attorneys feesor (a) Any law, ordinanceor governmental regulation (including but not limitedto building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,use, or enjoyment of theLand; (ii) the character,dimensionsor location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or g changein the dimensionsor areas or was a part; or (iv) environmentalprotection, ordinancesor governmental regulations, except to the extent that s notice of the enforcementt (b) Any governmental police power not excludedby
from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Knowledge.

Defects.liens,encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a)
’ created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the InsuredClaimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recordedin the Public Recordsat Dateof Policy,but Knownto the InsuredClaimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimantprior to the date the Insured Claimant becamean Insured under this policy; (2) resulting In no loss or damage to the InsuredClnlrnenl; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(this paragraph does not limit the coverageprovided under Covered Risks8, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24.25 and 26); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have hem sustained ifthe insured Claimanthad paid value for the Insured Mortgage.

Unenforceahility ofthe lien ofthe InsuredMortgage because of the inabilityor failure of the Insured failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with applicable doing businesslaws o Invalidity or unenforceabilltcyof the lien of the InsuredMortgage, or claimthereof, whicharl Insured Mortgageand Is based upon usury, except as provided in CoveredRisk 27 at Date of Policy,or the inabilityor
t the state inwhich the Land issituated.
sesout of the transaction evidencedby the
3 0!" any consumer credit protection or truth in lendinglaw.

Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental nnthority which becomea lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under CoveredRisks7, 8(a) and 26.

Any claim ofinvalidity, unenforceebility or lack of priority of the lieu of the Insured Mortgageas to advancesor modi?cationsmade after the Insured has Knowledgethat the Vestee shown in ScheduleA is no longer the owner of the estate or interestcovered by this policy.This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided InCoveredRisk 8. and all interest chargedthereon,
' tence olwhich are Known to the Insuredat;
greater as a result of the modi?cationthan it would have beenbefore the modili provided in Covered Risk 8.

Page 8 ends
Page 2572 of 4422 ends

daoarmo: ‘K3011053-
The First American Corporation
F irsz‘American TtitleCompany ofNapa Eirst American Title C°mP°”Y °fN“P" Privacy Policy
We Are Committed to SafeguardingCustomer Information
In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, information. We agree that you have a right to knowhow We will utilizethe pets Therefore, together with our parent company, The First ' ' govern the use and handlingof your personal information.

Types of Information
Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing,the types of nonpublic personal informationthatwemay collect include:
- Informationwe receive fromyou on applications,formsand in othercommunicationsto us, whetherin writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; Informationabout your transactionswith us, our affiliatedcompanies,or others;and Informationwe receive froma consumerreportingagency.

Use of Information
We request informationfrom you for our own legitimatebusinesspurposes and not for the bene?tof anynonaf?liatedparty. purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also ' information listed above to one or more of our a?iliated companies. Such affiliated companies include?nancialservice providers,such as title insurers,property and casualtyinsurers,and trust and investmentadvisorycompanies,or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies.

Former Customers . Even if you are no longer our customer, our PrivacyPolicy willcontinueto apply to you.

Con?dentiality and Security
We will use our best ’ © 2001 The FirstAmericanCorporation v All RightsReserved
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2573 of 4422 ends

“MK 1! 0 EIHIU PTN. RANCHO CARNE HUMAN/-1
FULTON
ommnft
M00103 P=w=uz:=oownan no-bmnavv muJ03 p3\unss‘f 5; Ilynqun an ' nomodmdwawssvsw 10.4P nu ma don 51111um» Aumnr a! Nun Cwntv mhaons1954 HETRACEDI978 OrdcrNo: TO0H053— Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2574 of 4422 ends

Exhibit J
ApprovedTitle Exceptions(Hunter Property)
Agreement of Purchase and Sale By and Between the City of St. Helena and Dennis Hunter HELE\45969\734I 10.5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2575 of 4422 ends

.‘ First AmeircmTitle
Company ofNapa
omenNo: 'roo11o52-

PRELIMINARYREPORT

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
First American Title Company ofNapa
1700 Second Street, Suite 120/P.O. Box 388
Napa, CA 94559
' Phone: (707) 254-4500 Fax (707) 226-9346
Property Address: Direct Title Inquiries to:

None Assigned Mitchell Glotzer
St. Helena, California _ E-mail: [email protected] Assessor’s Parcel Number: Phone: (707) 254 4500
009-030-020
Seller/Owner:

Dennis R. Hunter
In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance,thisCompanyhereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued,as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance,describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafterset forth, insuring against losswhichmay be sustainedby reason of any defect, lien or encumbrancenot shownor referred to as an exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed schedules,conditionsand stipulations of said policyforms.

The printed exceptions and exclusionsfrom the coverage of said policy or policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. ‘Copies of the policy forms shouldbe read. They are available from the of?ce whichissued this report.

Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is‘not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects,and encumbrances affectingtitle to the1and_ This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitatingthe or requested. Dated as ofJuly 21, 2003 at 7:30 A. M. By: Authorized Signatory Page 1 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2576 of 4422 ends

First AmeicanHtle
Company ofNapa
ORDERNO: T0011052-
The form of policy of title insurancecontemplated by thisreport is:
' ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06) with Regional Exceptions(Standard Coverage) Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:

DENNIS R. HUNTER,

AN D MAN
The estate or interest in the land hereinafterdescribedor referredto coveredby thisreport is:

A FEE
At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions containedin said policy form would be as follows:
4 1. General and special taxes and assessments forthe fiscalyear 2008-09,a liennot yet due or payable.

The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessedpursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.

3. An easement for underground water pipelines and incidentalpurposesin the documentrecorded December5, 1972 as Book 895 at page 383 of OfficialRecords. '
The terms and provisions contained in thedocumententitled "HuntAvenue StormDrainReimbursement Agreement"recorded November29, 1995as Series Number 1995026769of OfficialRecords.

5. The terms and provisions containedin the documententitled"Certi?cateof Cornpletion"recorded July26, 2002 as SeriesNumber 2002~0029720of OfficialRecords.

6. The lackof a right of access to and from the land.

7. Rights of parties in possession.
~ END OF EXCEPTIONS- Page 2
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2577 of 4422 ends

First Amican time
Company ofNapa
ORDERNO: T0011052—

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The land referred to in this report is situated in the City of St. Helena, CountyofNapa, State of California,and is described as follows:

COMMENCING at a point on the northwesternlineof the land formerly of D. 0. Hunt where the same is intersectedby the northeastern line of the 5 acre tract of land describedin the Deed to StephenJackse recorded March 17, 1919in Book 125 of Deeds at page 227,saidNapa CountyRecords;and runningthence alongsaid northwestern line of Hunt, North 28‘ 30' East 813.03feet to the southwesternline of the 17.22acre tract of land described in the Deed to ThomasQ.Swort?guer of record inBook 117 of Deeds at page 257,saidNapa County Records;thence along said line of Swort?guer South 72‘ 21‘East 570.6feet to the northwesternline of the 1-2/3 acre tract of land describedin the Deed to the Town of St. Helena, a municipal corporation, of record in Book 66 of Deeds at page 401, said Napa County Records;running along said northwesternline of the production thereof South 28‘ West 1226.78feet to the southwesternline of the 3.95 acre tract of land describedin TheDeed to Stephen Jaclcseof record in Book 129 of Deedsat page 478, said NapaCounty Records;thence along said southwestern lineNorth 62‘West 449.0 feet to the southeasternline of the aforesaid5 acre tract; thence along said southeastern line of said 5 acre tract South 28‘ 30'West 665.86 feet;thence North62‘West 114.5feet to the northwestern line of said 5 acres; thence alonghis mentionedline North 28‘ 30' East976.33feet to the point of commencement.
’ APN 009-030-020

WARNING
The Map attached hereto may or may not he a survey of the land depictedthereon. You shouldnot rely uponit for any purpose otherthan orientationto the generallocation of the parcel or parcels depicted. First American expressly disclaimsany liability for alleged lossor damagewhich may result fromrelianceupon suchmap.

Page 3 ends
Page 2578 of 4422 ends

Eirst American Title
Company a_fNapa
ORDERNO: T001105}-
Information Notes: a. General and specialtaxes and assessments for the ?scal year 2007-08.

First Installment : $8,876.85 PAID
SecondInstallment : $8,876.85 PAID
Tax Rate Area : 3000
A. P. No. 2 0O9~030-O20
b. The Assessor’s Parcel Number(s), if any, contained in the legaldescriptionherein, are forouickidenti?cation purposes only, and are not a part of the actual legal descriptions. c. Any statement regarding the acreage of the herein describedland containedwithinthe legal descriptionin this report is derived fromthe public record and is forrecordeddeedpurposes only. The Policy of Title Insurance contemplated by thisreport provides no insurancewith respect to acreage andno acreage statement will appear within the legal description ofsuchpolicy.
cl. The County Recorder may charge an additional$20.00 recordingfee, if not provided with a “Preliminary Change of Ownership Report" Form, for each Deed to be recorded. The purchaser isresponsible for completing and signing this form.
e. Before an escrow can close, or funds placed in a SavingsAccount,the Sellermust furnish a Taxpayer Identi?cation Number to us so that we can file an IRS Form 1099S or its equivalent,with the Internal Revenue Service. This procedure isrequiredby Section6045 ofthe InternalRevenueCode, f. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitrationclause.Whenthe Amount of Insurance is lessthan the certaindollaramount set forth in any applicablearbitrationclause,all arbitrablematters shall be arhitratedat the option of either the Company or the Insuredas the exclusiveremedy of theparties. If you desire to review the terms of the policy, including any arbitrationclausethat may be included,contact the office that issued this Commitment or Report to obtaina sample of the policyjacket forthe policythat isto be issuedin . connection with your nansaction.

Lenders Supplemental Report:
g. According to the public records,therehas beenno conveyance of the land withina period of two years prior to the date of this report, except as follows:

NONE
CSH
exn bv/ am 2cc: COOMBS & DUNLAPLLP, 1211DivisionSt, Napa, CA 94559 — Amy Valukevich Page 4
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2579 of 4422 ends

r ORDERNo: T0lil1052-
Form No. 1068-! (Rev. 06/17/06)

EXHIBIT A
LIST OF PRINTEDEXCEPTIONSAND EXCLUSIONS(By Policy Type)

1. CALIFORNIALAND 'I‘lTLE ASSOCIATION
STANDARDCOVERAGE POLICY — 1990

EXCLUSIONSFROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Companywill not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys‘ fees or expenses which arise by reason of:

1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances,or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land‘,(ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensionsor area of the land or any parcel ofwhich the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect ofany violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice ofthe enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrancc resulting from a violation or alleged violationaffecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or noticeof a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the landhas been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.

Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy whichwould be binding on the rights ora purchaser for value without knowledge.

3. Defects, liens.cncu mbranccs, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreedto by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but knownto the insured claimant and not disclosedin writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for thc estate or interest insured by this policy.

4. Unenforceahllity of the lienofthc insured mortgage because of the lnabiii failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,
situated.
ty or failure of the insured at Date afPolicy, or the inability or to comply with the applicable doing business lawsof the state in which the land is

5. Invalidity or uncnforccahility of the lieu of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out oftho transaction evidenced by the , insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lendinglaw.

6. Any claim, which arises out ufthe transaction vating in the insured the estate of interestinsured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvencyor similarcreditors‘ rights laws.

EXCEPTIONSFROM COVERAGE — SCHEDULE B, PART!
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys‘ fees or expenses) whicharise by reason of:

1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existingliens by the records of any taxing authority that leviestaxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. - Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or noticesofsuch proceedings,whether or not shown by the cgcords of such agency or by the public records. which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. Page I Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2580 of 4422 ends

Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines,shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts whicha correct survey would disclose.and which are not shown by the public records.
(:1) Unpotented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patent: or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (la)or (c) are shown by the public records.

2. CLTA HOMEOWNERJSPOLICYOF TITLE INSURANCE(10/22/03)

ALTA HOMEOWNEFJSPOLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE

EXCLUSIONS
in addition to the Exceptions in ScheduleB, You are not insuredagainst loss, costs, attorneys‘ fees,and expenses resulting from:
i, Governmental police power, and the existence or violation oi‘any law or regulations concerning:
government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and . building
zoning
Land use
improvements on the Land
Land division
environmental protection
-"'£"°'PP"’
This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement ofthese matters ii‘noticeof the violationor enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date.

This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, 17 or 24.

2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes ifnotice ofthe violation appears in the PublicRecordsat the PolicyDate.

3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or b. the taking happened before the PolicyDale and is binding on You ii'You bought the Land withoutKnowing ofthc taking.

4. Risks:
:1. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unlessthey appear in the PublicRecordsat the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date—this does not limit the coverage describedin CoveredRisk'7,8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25.

5. Failure to pay value for Your Title.

6. Lack ofa right:
a. to any Land outside the area speci?cally describedand referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.

This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in CoveredRisk 11 or 18.

LIMITATIONSON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limitedon the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows:

For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Yourbcductible Amountand Our Maximum DollarLimit oi‘Llobiiityshown in schedule A.

Page 2 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2581 of 4422 ends

The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limitsshown on Schedule A are as follows:

Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liablllg Covered Risk 14: 1% of Policy Amount or 3 2,500 - 5 10,000 (Subdivision Law Violation) (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 15: 1% ofPolicy Amount or S5,000 5 25.000
(Building Permit) (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 16: 1% of Policy Amountor 5 5,000 5 25,000 (Zoning) (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 18: 1% of Policy Amount or S 2,500 S 5,000 (Encroachment of Boundary Walls or Fences) (whichever is less)

3. AMERICANLANDTITLE ASSOCIATION
RESIDENTIALTITLE INSURANCEPOLICY(6-1-87)

EXCLUSIONS
in addition to the Exceptions in ScheduleB, you are not insuredagainst loss, costs, attorneys‘ fees, and expenses resulting from:

1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. ‘ This includesbuilding and zoning ordinances
and also laws and regulations concerning:
o land use . improvements on the land
0 land division
I environmental protection
This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date.

This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks.

2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: . a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records . on the Policy Date the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you ifyou boughtthc land withoutknowing ofthe taking

3. Title Risks:
that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you
that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Datewunless they appeared in the public records that result in no loss to you
nose
that first effect your title after the Policy Date - this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks

4. Failure to pay value for your title.

5. Lack of 8 right:
as to any land outside the area speci?cally described and referred to in Item3 of Schedule A OR a in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusiondoes not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risiu.

4. AMERICAN LANDTITLE ASSOCIATIONLOANPOLICY (10-17-92) WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORMI COVERAGE

EXCLUSIONSFROM COVERAGE
following matters expressly
1, (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limitedto buiidin restricting, regulating. prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, location of any improvement nowor hereafter erected on the land; olthe land or any parcel ofwhich the land is or was a part; ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the exten encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation g and zoninglaws, ordinances, or regulations) use, or enjoyment of the land;(ii) the character, dimensionsor (ill) a separation in ownershipor a change in the dimensionsor area or (iv) environmentalprotection, orthe effect of any violationof thesclews, t that a notice of the enforcement thereofora notice of a defect,lien or affecting the land has been recordedin the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excludedby (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice ole defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violationor alleged violation affecting the land has beenrecorded in the public records at Dateof Policy. Page 3 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2582 of 4422 ends

Rights of eminentdomain unless noticeof the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policywhich wouldbe binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge.

3. Defects, liens.encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, so lfered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosedin writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior-to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(exceptto the extent that thispolicy insures the priority of the lieu of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien forservices,labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under constructionor completed at Date of Policy); or e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage.

4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insuredmortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing businesslaws of the state in which the land is situated.

5. invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumercredit protection or truth in lending law.

6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or theclaim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not ?nanced in wholeor in part by proceeds of the indebtednesssecured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policythe insured has advanced or is obligated to advance.

7. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors‘rights laws, that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudu lent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest ofthe insured mortgagee as a result of the application oithe doctrine or equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mort gages being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor.

The above palicyforms may be issued to affordeither Standard Coverage or ExtendedCoverage. In additionto Hit?aboveExclusionsframCoverage, the Excepriolys?oln Coverage in a Standard Coveragepolicy willalso includethe following GeneralExceptions:

EXCEPTIONSFROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys‘ fees or expenses) which arise by reasonof:

1. Taxes or assessments which are not shownas existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.

2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.

3. Easements, claimsof easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the publicrecords.

4. Discrepancies, contlicts in boundary lines,shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. water claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services,labor or material theretoiore or hereafter furnished,imposedby law and not shown by the public records. Page 4 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2583 of 4422 ends

S. 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (D6-17-—(l6)

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverageof this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage. costs, attorneys‘ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:

1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating tobuilding and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision ofland; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances.or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk5.
’
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.

Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusiondoes not modify or limit the coverage providedunder Covered Risk? or 8.

3. Defects.liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (:1) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (is) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy,but Known to the insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured Claimantprior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk11, 13, or 14); or
(c) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.

4. Unenforcenbility of the lien of the insured Mortgage because oftlie inability or failure ofanInsured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated.

5. invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien ofthe Insured Mortgage that arises out ofthe transaction evidenced by the insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law.

6. Any claim.by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the insured Mortgage, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy.

Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Dateof Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the PublicRecords. This Exclusion doesnot modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b).

The above policyformsmay be issued to affordeitherStandard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the aboveExclusionsfromCoverage, the ExceptionsfromCoverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include lhe?zlloivlug GeneralExceptiaiis:

1. The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that leviestaxes or assessments on real property or in the Public Records.
'

2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the PublicRecords but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession of the Land.

3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances that are not shownby the Public Records.

Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation,variation or adverse circumstance affectingthe Title including discrepancies,

5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exception in patents or‘ in acts authorizingthe issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. ~ Any lien, or right to a
lien,
for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. Page 5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2584 of 4422 ends

6. AMERICAN LANDTITLE ASSOCIATIONOWNER‘S POLICY (10-17-92)

EXCLUSIONSFROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys‘ feesor expenses which arise by reason of:

1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (11)the character, dimensionsor location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area ofthe land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection. or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcementthereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public recordsat Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, exce lien or encumbrance resulting from a violationor all
Policy.
pt to the extent that a notice ofthe exercise thereof or a notice of a defect. eged violationaffecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dateof

2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the publicrecords at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taldng which has occurred prior to Date of Policywhich would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3, Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insuredclaimant; (b) not knownto the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosedin writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimantbecame an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate orinteresl insured by this policy.

4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason ofthe operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors‘ rights laws, that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insuredby this policy beingdeemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) ofsuch rccordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor.

The above palicyforms may be issued to a?ordeither Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions fromCoverage, the ExceptionsfromCoverage In 11Standard CoveragePolicywillalso includethe?zllawing GeneralExceptions:

EXCEPTIONSFROMCOVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys‘ fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:

2. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existingliens by the records of any taxing authority that leviestaxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.

2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims whichare not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.

3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 3 correct survey would disclose,and which are not shown by the public records. ’ 5, Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,imposedby law and not shown by the public records. Page 6 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2585 of 4422 ends

7. mos ALTA ownervsPOLICY (as-17.—ua)
EXCLUSIONSFROM covcnacs
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage oi’this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys‘ fees, or expenses that arise by reason oi‘:

1. (2)
(11)
Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(I) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment oithe Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision ofland; or
(iv) envimnmentalprotection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk5.

Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.

2. Rights ofeminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under CoveredRisk 7 or 8.

3. Defects, liens.encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (11)
(b)
(C)
(d)
(9)
created, sulfered.assumed.or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Knownto the InsuredClaimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or
resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained ii‘the insured Claimant had paid value for the Title.

Any claim, by reason of the operation oi‘federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vestingthe Title as shown in Schedule A, is
(X)
(b)
a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or a preferential transfer for any reasonnot stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy.

Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date oi’recording ofthe deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A.

The abavepnlicyfarlus may be issued to affordeither Standard Coverageor Extended Coverage.‘ In addition to the aboveExclusionsfromCoverage, the Exception:fromCoverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include thefollawlrxg General Exceptions:

EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policydoes not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys‘ fees or expenses) which arise by reason at’:

1. The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or in the Public Records.
‘
Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession of the Land.

Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances that are not shown by the Public Records.

Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation,variation or adverse circumstance affectingthe Title including discrepancies, conflictsin boundary lines,shortage in area, or any other facts that would be disclosedby an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, and that are not shown in the Public Records.

Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exception in patents or in acts authorizingthe issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. ‘

Page 7 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2586 of 4422 ends

8. ALTA EXPANDEDCOVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13ll]i)

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage ofthis policy and the Companywill not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or expenses which arise by reason of:

1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances,or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) theoccupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or areas of theLand or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that 9 notice of the enforcement thereof or a noticeof a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violationaffecting the Land has been recorded in the PublicRecords at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13;ill, and 16 of this policy. (to) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thercofor a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Pubiicilecords at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13,id, and 16 of this policy.

Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereofhas been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights ofa purchaser {or value without Knowledge.

Defects, llens,encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Recordsat Date of Pulley, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in noloss or damage to the insured Claimant; (ii) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph does not limit the coverage provided under CoveredRisks 8, 16, 18,19, 20, 21,21, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or » (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.

Unenforceahility of the lien ofthe insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is situated. invalidity or unenforceabiiity of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidencedby the insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in Covered Risk 27,or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law.

Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental authority which become a lienon the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This
exclusiondoes not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7, 8(a) and 26.

Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lieu of the insured Mortgage as to advancesor modifications made after the insured has Knowledge that the vestee shownin Schedule A is no longer the owner ofthe estate or interestcovered by this policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in CoveredRisk 8.

Lack of priority of the lien of the insured Mortgage as to each and every advance made after Date ofPollcy, and all interest charged thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title, the existence of which are Known to the insured at:
(a) The time of the advance; or
(b) The time a modi?cation is made to the terms of the Insured Mortgage which changes the rate ofinterest charged, if the rate of interest is greater as a result of the modi?cation than it would have been before the modification. This exclu _d d
I C d R_ k 8
sion does not limit the coverage
[DFOVIE m OVBFE IS .

The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereofto have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This exclusiondoes not apply to violations of building codesif notice ofthe violationappears in the Public Records at Date of Policy.

Page 8 ends
Page 2587 of 4422 ends

DannaNo: T001]0S2-
The First American Corporation
_. _ First American Title Company of Napa
First American Zlitle
C°”‘P‘"‘3’ °fN"P“ Privacy «Policy
We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information
In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understandthat you may be concerned about what we will do with such information — particularly any personalor ?nancial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilizethe personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personalinformation. ' Applicability
This Privacy Policy governs our use of the informationwhich you provide to us. it does not govern the manner in whichwe may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as informationobtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelinesthat govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair InformationValues,a copy of which can be found on our websiteat www.firstam.com.

Types of Information
Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublicpersonal information that we may collect include:
'
Information we receive from you on applications,forms and in other communicationsto us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means;
- Informationabout your transactionswith us, our affiliated companies,or others; and in Information we receive from a consumerreporting agency.

Use of Information - We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the bene?t of any nonaf?liated party.

Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessaryfor us to providethe product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information inde?nitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such informationmay be used for any internal purpose,such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal informationlisted above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such af?liated companies include financialservice providers,such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investmentadvisory companies,or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies.

Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as describedabove, to companiesthat perform marketing serviceson our behalf, on behalf of our affiliatedcompanies, or to other financial institutionswith whom we or our a?iliated companieshave joint marketing agreements.

Former Customers
Even if you are no longer our customer, our PrivacyPolicy will continue to apply to you.

Confidentiality and Security
to to who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employeesand agentsto ensure that your informationwill be handled responsibly and in accordancewith this Privacy Policy and First American’sFair In?ormation Values. We currently maintainphysical,electronic,and procedural safeguards that comply withfederal regulations to guard your nonpublicpersonal information. © 2001TheFirstAmericanCorporation v All RightsReserved
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2588 of 4422 ends

IV‘) 3
0 °’-‘ 0. .,I ~
~ ,g
$.05 =' 3 2
‘-
DDK
IE
E!
'U8
cm 388
émn E
E? E ._ -
OWIGE I?-31-M mun‘
' u030-I9
». mm-.5: lo 55 Lu
10:51.01 mu:

PTN. RANCHO CARNE HUMANA 3002
(HUDSON /v
‘ 1 / W033 nn
- .
-'1 H3lHM3é)VWVO 80 S901 '"°‘*’°H I O393T1V80;h\ln!8Vl"tANVSWM3$1€1 PBIMVIMJN00 “ll 10 -(991119-‘H Mssazme !~i‘d312i3WVism ‘G313-Id3Cl s1a:>uv.s:10 13am amso Nouvam ‘IVd3H‘:\5)amonNouvmamomm aamoasoeuna M\'V2:lO$1| NOd? mas
ION muons
no). 'ND§?J3H aaxaxaaaam am
‘ :§OA3I\HnS\i2E1GNAVW80.RW‘ldVWSlHl W11°: WUMFV3: lmsqbn on ‘ 1390
sasodandmauxssaxsy :03 pm we
so» daresxtu=31ON DEPICTEDTHEREON.YOUSHOULDNOTRELYUPONIT ARCELORP EXPRESSLYDISCLAIMSANY LIABILITYFOR ALLEGEDLOSSoR DAMAGEwmcn MAY RESULT :*«R<3‘t\]4‘$zf13-;I:'.S1A)r»}13cf:’£C“i}‘1:Sc1))1§: ?r?TM\AN1£ERICAN OrderNo: T00] 1052. WARNING: THEMAP ATTACHED HERETO MAY 0R MAY NOT BE.A SURVEYOF FOR ANY PURPOSEOTHER THANORXENTATIONTO THEGENERALLOCATXONOFTHEP Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2589 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2590 of 4422 ends

HUNTERSUBDIVISION

HYDROLOGYANALYSIS

EXHIBITC
FIGURENO. 6 — OVERALLSITE MAP SUB BASIN DELINEATION MAP MEAD & HUNT— INTERIOR DRAINAGEANALYSISFINALREPORT
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2591 of 4422 ends

’“\"“‘°\“’°°‘\""‘\°’“'°\R “‘l|¢\6¢WkIlII\1nno—m-canal-saannng an :17 2911 _ ,1“-7,,‘

SUBMI TTED
TiAPF‘-' lUVIU
'$11: 3‘
'4. NO. ma
-——q—:_1— R<_i3Ec
ItAI\I Ix-. PROTECTION noon ,_..., 5I9u~o5uo1 ..I,STLHEL -5'-. ':..-I No. FIGURE -.-.vI\*4LA_6SHE MAP OVERALL lath")?! ('1an-‘nu :4.\VIl.q:1u. N-v MAP DEUNEATION SUB~B/LSIH 1'-..|;\‘S|u|"|-an .ln:~.|lllJv?l\'!k‘. M-H-0!

Page 2592 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Interior
Drainage
Analysis
Miller Property/Hunter
Property/Hunt Avenue
Final Report
._~‘.Ll§ . City of St. Helena
Comprehensive Flood
Protection Project
Report prepared by
Offices Nationwide
www.meadhunt.com
February 2012
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2593 of 4422 ends

Existing Conditions SWMMModel Output
10 year Storm Event
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2594 of 4422 ends

######################################
# Rainfall input summary from Runoff #
######################################
Total rainfall for gage # 1 is 6.2357 inches
##############################
# Data Group Fl #
# Evaporation Rate (in/month)#
##############################
JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
#############################
# Data Group F1 #
# Evaporation Rate (in/day) #
#############################
JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.000 0.000
###################################################

2.. u‘
'~ - e r.-;«
‘ w
— -
-" ~,«- 1
# Physical Hydrology Data #
###################################################
...L . r
Deprs Deprs Prcnt
A —sion —sion Zero
Subcatchment Channel Width Area
‘EEK Slope "n" "n" Storge Strge Deten
TQ Name or inlet (ft) (ac) A ft/ft Imprv Perv Imprv Perv —tion Nl 11.100 70.00 0.000 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00 2 N2#l N2 6000.0 22.900 70.00 0.000 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00 3 N2#2 N2 431.00 9.9000 30.00 0.001 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2595 of 4422 ends

1 N7#1 N7 600.00 15.000
"1 0.024 0.014 0.030 0.000 0.000 0.00
5 N7#2 N7 3703.0 8.5000

0.00 0.000 0.014 0.030 0.000 0.000 0.00
6 N4#l N4 2100.0 4.8000

42.40 0.000 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00
################################################################# ######################################
# Table R2. SUBCATCHMENT DATA
#
# Infiltration or Time of Concentration Data
#
#
#
# Infiltration Type Infl #1(#5) Infl #2(#6)
Infl #3(#7) Infl #4(#8) #
# SCS —> Comp CN Time Conc
Shape Factor Depth or Fraction #
# SBUH —> Comp CN Time Conc
N/A N/A #
# Green Ampt —> Suction Hydr Cond
Initial MD N/A #
# Horton —> Max Rate Min Rate Decay
Rate (1/sec) Max. Infilt. Volume #
# Proportional ~> Constant N/A
N/A N/A #
# Initial/Cont Loss —> Initial Continuing N/A N/A #
# Initial/Proportional —> Initial Constant
N/A N/A #
# Laurenson Parameters —> B Value Pervious "n"
Impervious Cont Exponent #
# Rational Formula —> To Method Flow Path Length Flow
Path Slope Roughness or Retardance #
# (#1 — #4 is Impervious Data / #5
— #8 is Pervious Data) #
# Rational Formula Tc Method: 1 = Constant
#
# 2 = Friend's
Equation #
# 3 = Kinematic
Wave #
# 4 = Alameda
5 = Izzard's Formula # # 6
= Kerby's Equation # # 7= Kirpich's Equation #
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2596 of 4422 ends

Proposed Conditions SWMMModel Output
100 year Storm Event
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2597 of 4422 ends

######################################
# Rainfall input summary from Runoff #
######################################
Total rainfall for gage # 1 is 8.9995 inches
##############################
# Data Group Fl #
# Evaporation Rate (in/month)#
##############################
JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
#############################
# Data Group Fl #
# Evaporation Rate (in/day) #
#############################
JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0.000 0.000
#### #####..
lo:
:1::###################################
# Physical Hydrology Data # ################################################### Deprs Deprs Prcnt
IIE¥1? —sion —sion Zero
Subcatchment Channel Width Area
(in Slope "n" "n" Storge Strge Deten
‘l???i Name or inlet (ft) (ac) ?x ft/ft Imprv Perv Imprv Perv —tion 1 Nl#l Nl 4835.0 ll.lO0 70.00 0.000 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00 2 N2#l N2 6000.0 22.900 70.00 0.000 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00 3 N2#2 N2 431.00 9.9000 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2598 of 4422 ends

30.00 0.001 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00
‘an N7#l N7
“E50010 0.014 0.030 0.000 0.000 0.00
5 N9#1 N9

70.00 0.010 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00
6 N9#2 N9

0.00 0.006 0.014 0.030 0.000 0.000 0.00
7 N4#1 N4

42.40 0.000 0.014 0.060 0.000 0.000 0.00
15000. 15.000
14750. 8.5000
545.00 1.2500
2100.0 4.8000
################################################################# ######################################
# Table R2. SUBCATCHMENT DATA
#
# Infiltration or Time of Concentration Data
#
#
#
# Infiltration Type Infl #l(#5) Infl #2(#6)
Infl #3(#7)
Infl #4(#8) #
# SCS —> Comp CN Time Conc
Shape Factor Depth or Fraction #
# SBUH -> Comp CN Time Conc N/A N/A #
# Green Ampt —> Suction Hydr Cond
Initial MD N/A #
# Horton —> Max Rate Min Rate Decay Rate (1/sec) Max. Infilt. Volume # # Proportional —> Constant N/A
N/A N/A #
# Initial/Cont Loss —> Initial Continuing N/A N/A #
# Initial/Proportional —> Initial Constant N/A N/A #
# Laurenson Parameters —> B Value Pervious "n"
Impervious Cont Exponent #
# Rational Formula —> To Method Flow Path Length Flow
Path Slope Roughness or Retardance #
# (#1 — #4 is Impervious Data / #5 - #8 is Pervious Data) # # Rational Formula Tc Method: 1 = Constant #
#
2 = Friend's Equation #
# 4
= Alameda Method # # 5= Izzard's Formula # # 6= Kerby's Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2599 of 4422 ends
Page 2600 of 4422 ends

Noise Appendix – Field Data Sheets
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2601 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT1 24-Hour Noise Levels
CNEL Calculation
Leq Time Adjustment

36.3 Midnight 10 46.3 46.3
37 1 10 47 47

38.8 2 10 48.8 48.8

36.4 3 10 46.4 46.4

38.7 4 10 48.7 48.7

42.8 5 10 52.8 52.8

43.5 6 10 53.5 53.5

45.6 7am 45.6 45.6
45 8 45 45

42.4 9 42.4 42.4

40.7 10 40.7 40.7

42.4 11 42.4 42.4

51.7 noon 51.7 51.7

41.5 1 41.5 41.5

43.1 2 43.1 43.1

40.9 3 40.9 40.9

42.6 4 42.6 42.6

40.3 5 40.3 40.3

45.9 6 45.9 45.9

39.3 7 5 44.3 39.3

39.5 8 5 44.5 39.5

38.7 9 5 43.7 38.7
43 10 10 53 53

36.6 11 10 46.6 46.6

47.7 47.5

CNEL LDN

Page 1 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2602 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT2 24-Hour Noise Levels
CNEL Calculation
Leq Time Adjustment
39 Midnight 10 49 49

39.4 1 10 49.4 49.4

39.9 2 10 49.9 49.9
40 3 10 50 50

43.7 4 10 53.7 53.7

46.1 5 10 56.1 56.1

46.9 6 10 56.9 56.9

47.2 7am 47.2 47.2

43.3 8 43.3 43.3

41.7 9 41.7 41.7

41.7 10 41.7 41.7

42.7 11 42.7 42.7

40.7 noon 40.7 40.7

41.8 1 41.8 41.8

40.1 2 40.1 40.1

40.2 3 40.2 40.2

40.5 4 40.5 40.5

39.9 5 39.9 39.9

42.7 6 42.7 42.7

41.8 7 5 46.8 41.8

42.5 8 5 47.5 42.5

47.4 9 5 52.4 47.4
41 10 10 51 51

39.4 11 10 49.4 49.4

49.6 49.2

CNEL LDN

Page 3 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2603 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT3 24-Hour Noise Levels
CNEL Calculation
Leq Time Adjustment

38.9 Midnight 10 48.9 48.9

40.3 1 10 50.3 50.3

39.9 2 10 49.9 49.9

39.6 3 10 49.6 49.6

41.2 4 10 51.2 51.2

42.8 5 10 52.8 52.8

45.6 6 10 55.6 55.6

45.9 7am 45.9 45.9

43.6 8 43.6 43.6

42.6 9 42.6 42.6

40.3 10 40.3 40.3

43.1 11 43.1 43.1

60.9 noon 60.9 60.9

46.5 1 46.5 46.5

44.1 2 44.1 44.1
46 3 46 46

46.7 4 46.7 46.7

48.2 5 48.2 48.2

46.6 6 46.6 46.6

51.2 7 5 56.2 51.2

51.3 8 5 56.3 51.3

46.2 9 5 51.2 46.2

43.7 10 10 53.7 53.7

40.2 11 10 50.2 50.2

52.2 51.4

CNEL LDN

Page 5 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2604 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT1 24-Hour Measurement
with Hourly Statistics
Rec 1 to 24 Slow Response
Date hh:mm:ss LeqPeriod Leq
10/16/2018 11:58 1.0 hour 51.7
10/16/2018 12:58 1.0 hour 41.5
10/16/2018 13:58 1.0 hour 43.1
10/16/2018 14:58 1.0 hour 40.9
10/16/2018 15:58 1.0 hour 42.6
10/16/2018 16:58 1.0 hour 40.3
10/16/2018 17:58 1.0 hour 45.9
10/16/2018 18:58 1.0 hour 39.3
10/16/2018 19:58 1.0 hour 39.5
10/16/2018 20:58 1.0 hour 38.7
10/16/2018 21:58 1.0 hour 43
10/16/2018 22:58 1.0 hour 36.6
10/16/2018 23:58 1.0 hour 36.3
10/17/2018 0:58 1.0 hour 37
10/17/2018 1:58 1.0 hour 38.8
10/17/2018 2:58 1.0 hour 36.4
10/17/2018 3:58 1.0 hour 38.7
10/17/2018 4:58 1.0 hour 42.8
10/17/2018 5:58 1.0 hour 43.5
10/17/2018 6:58 1.0 hour 45.6
10/17/2018 7:58 1.0 hour 45
10/17/2018 8:58 1.0 hour 42.4
10/17/2018 9:58 1.0 hour 40.7
10/17/2018 10:58 1.0 hour 42.4
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2605 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT2 24-Hour Measurement
with Hourly Statistics
Rec 1 to 24 Slow Response dBA weighting
Date hh:mm:ss LeqPeriod Leq
10/16/2018 11:26 1.0 hour 42.7
10/16/2018 12:26 1.0 hour 40.7
10/16/2018 13:26 1.0 hour 41.8
10/16/2018 14:26 1.0 hour 40.1
10/16/2018 15:26 1.0 hour 40.2
10/16/2018 16:26 1.0 hour 40.5
10/16/2018 17:26 1.0 hour 39.9
10/16/2018 18:26 1.0 hour 42.7
10/16/2018 19:26 1.0 hour 41.8
10/16/2018 20:26 1.0 hour 42.5
10/16/2018 21:26 1.0 hour 47.4
10/16/2018 22:26 1.0 hour 41
10/16/2018 23:26 1.0 hour 39.4
10/17/2018 0:26 1.0 hour 39
10/17/2018 1:26 1.0 hour 39.4
10/17/2018 2:26 1.0 hour 39.9
10/17/2018 3:26 1.0 hour 40
10/17/2018 4:26 1.0 hour 43.7
10/17/2018 5:26 1.0 hour 46.1
10/17/2018 6:26 1.0 hour 46.9
10/17/2018 7:26 1.0 hour 47.2
10/17/2018 8:26 1.0 hour 43.3
10/17/2018 9:26 1.0 hour 41.7
10/17/2018 10:26 1.0 hour 41.7
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2606 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT3 24-Hour Measurement
with Hourly Statistics
Rec 1 to 24 Slow Response dBA weighting
Date hh:mm:ss LeqPeriod Leq
10/16/2018 11:44 1.0 hour 60.9
10/16/2018 12:44 1.0 hour 46.5
10/16/2018 13:44 1.0 hour 44.1
10/16/2018 14:44 1.0 hour 46
10/16/2018 15:44 1.0 hour 46.7
10/16/2018 16:44 1.0 hour 48.2
10/16/2018 17:44 1.0 hour 46.6
10/16/2018 18:44 1.0 hour 51.2
10/16/2018 19:44 1.0 hour 51.3
10/16/2018 20:44 1.0 hour 46.2
10/16/2018 21:44 1.0 hour 43.7
10/16/2018 22:44 1.0 hour 40.2
10/16/2018 23:44 1.0 hour 38.9
10/17/2018 0:44 1.0 hour 40.3
10/17/2018 1:44 1.0 hour 39.9
10/17/2018 2:44 1.0 hour 39.6
10/17/2018 3:44 1.0 hour 41.2
10/17/2018 4:44 1.0 hour 42.8
10/17/2018 5:44 1.0 hour 45.6
10/17/2018 6:44 1.0 hour 45.9
10/17/2018 7:44 1.0 hour 43.6
10/17/2018 8:44 1.0 hour 42.6
10/17/2018 9:44 1.0 hour 40.3
10/17/2018 10:44 1.0 hour 43.1
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2607 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT1 24-Hour Noise Data
Rec 1 to 28 Slow Response dBA weighting 0.5 dB resolution stats Date hh:mm:ss LeqPeriod Leq Lmax Lmin L1% L5% L10% L50% L90% 10/16/2018 11:58 1.0 hour 51.7 81.9 36.5 55 46 42 38 36.5 10/16/2018 12:58 1.0 hour 41.5 61 35.5 50.5 45 43 38.5 36.5 10/16/2018 13:58 1.0 hour 43.1 65.2 36.7 53 47.5 44 38.5 36.5 10/16/2018 14:58 1.0 hour 40.9 66.3 36.7 50 44 41.5 38.5 36.5 10/16/2018 15:58 1.0 hour 42.6 57.6 36.7 51 46.5 44.5 39.5 36.5 10/16/2018 16:58 1.0 hour 40.3 54.7 36.7 48 43.5 42 38.5 36.5 10/16/2018 17:58 1.0 hour 45.9 65.2 36.7 58.5 52 45.5 39.5 38.5 10/16/2018 18:58 1.0 hour 39.3 53 35.3 47.5 42.5 40.5 38.5 36.5 10/16/2018 19:58 1.0 hour 39.5 53.9 33.8 46 42.5 41 38.5 36.5 10/16/2018 20:58 1.0 hour 38.7 56.1 33.8 45.5 41.5 40 36.5 36.5 10/16/2018 21:58 1.0 hour 43 65.9 33.8 51.5 44 41 36.5 35 10/16/2018 22:58 1.0 hour 36.6 45.5 33.8 42 39 38 36.5 35 10/16/2018 23:58 1.0 hour 36.3 46.1 33.8 42 38.5 37.5 36 35 10/17/2018 0:58 1.0 hour 37 52.7 33.8 41.5 39.5 38.5 36.5 35 10/17/2018 1:58 1.0 hour 38.8 54.3 33.8 48 44 40.5 36.5 35 10/17/2018 2:58 1.0 hour 36.4 46.8 33.8 43 38.5 36.5 36 35 10/17/2018 3:58 1.0 hour 38.7 47.8 33.8 43.5 41.5 40.5 38 35 10/17/2018 4:58 1.0 hour 42.8 57.4 36.7 48 45 44 42.5 38.5 10/17/2018 5:58 1.0 hour 43.5 53.4 38.5 47.5 45.5 45 43 41 10/17/2018 6:58 1.0 hour 45.6 67.3 40.6 50.5 47 46 44 42 10/17/2018 7:58 1.0 hour 45 63.2 39.7 52.5 47.5 46.5 43.5 41 10/17/2018 8:58 1.0 hour 42.4 50.2 38.9 46 44 43.5 42 40.5 10/17/2018 9:58 1.0 hour 40.7 54.2 36.7 48.5 43 42 39.5 37 10/17/2018 10:58 1.0 hour 42.4 59.4 36.7 52 47 45 39 38 10/17/2018 11:58 1.0 hour 42 64.4 36.7 54 45.5 42.5 38.5 36.5 10/17/2018 12:58 1.0 hour 43.6 65.2 36.3 55 48.5 45.5 38.5 36.5 10/17/2018 13:58 1.0 hour 41 60.6 36.2 50 45.5 43 38 36.5 10/17/2018 14:58 25.1 min 49 76.9 36.7 50.5 45.5 42.5 38.5 36.5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2608 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT2 24-Hour Data
Rec 1 to 29 Slow Response dBA weighting 0.5 dB resolution stats Date hh:mm:ss LeqPeriod Leq Lmax Lmin L1% L5% L10% L50% L90% 10/16/2018 11:26 1.0 hour 42.7 69.7 37.3 50 42 40 39 39 10/16/2018 12:26 1.0 hour 40.7 54.3 37.3 47.5 43 42 40 39 10/16/2018 13:26 1.0 hour 41.8 56.2 37.3 49.5 45 43.5 40 39 10/16/2018 14:26 1.0 hour 40.1 53.7 37.2 46 42 41 39 38.5 10/16/2018 15:26 1.0 hour 40.2 50.7 37.3 45 42.5 42 39 37.5 10/16/2018 16:26 1.0 hour 40.5 62.6 37.3 49.5 42.5 40.5 39 37 10/16/2018 17:26 1.0 hour 39.9 64.5 37.2 45.5 41.5 40 38.5 37 10/16/2018 18:26 1.0 hour 42.7 53 37.3 47.5 45 44.5 42 40 10/16/2018 19:26 1.0 hour 41.8 51.3 37.2 47.5 45 44 41 38.5 10/16/2018 20:26 1.0 hour 42.5 54.8 37.3 48 45.5 44.5 41.5 39 10/16/2018 21:26 1.0 hour 47.4 72 37.3 50 45.5 44.5 41 39 10/16/2018 22:26 1.0 hour 41 52.8 37 47.5 44.5 43 39.5 37 10/16/2018 23:26 1.0 hour 39.4 50.8 34.3 45 42.5 41.5 38.5 37 10/17/2018 0:26 1.0 hour 39 47.1 34.3 43.5 42 41 38 35.5 10/17/2018 1:26 1.0 hour 39.4 48.4 34.3 45 42.5 41.5 38.5 37 10/17/2018 2:26 1.0 hour 39.9 49.4 34.3 46.5 44 42.5 38.5 37 10/17/2018 3:26 1.0 hour 40 55.6 37.1 46 43 42 39 37
10/17/2018 4:26 1.0 hour 43.7 56.7 37.3 51 47 46 42 40
10/17/2018 5:26 1.0 hour 46.1 52.8 40.2 50 49 48 45.5 42.5 10/17/2018 6:26 1.0 hour 46.9 55.6 42.5 50 48.5 48 46.5 45 10/17/2018 7:26 1.0 hour 47.2 60.9 44.3 51.5 49 48 46.5 45 10/17/2018 8:26 1.0 hour 43.3 58.9 40.3 49 45.5 44.5 42 41 10/17/2018 9:26 1.0 hour 41.7 58.8 39.1 49 43.5 42 40 40 10/17/2018 10:26 1.0 hour 41.7 59.8 39 49 44.5 42 40 39 10/17/2018 11:26 1.0 hour 40.8 51.2 38.8 47 43.5 42 40 39 10/17/2018 12:26 1.0 hour 43.9 60.6 38.6 54 47 44.5 41 39.5 10/17/2018 13:26 1.0 hour 41.6 58 37.3 49 44.5 42.5 40 39 10/17/2018 14:26 1.0 hour 41.2 51.2 37.3 46.5 43.5 42.5 40.5 39 10/17/2018 15:26 5.6 min 45.1 62.1 38.8 58.5 45.8 42.7 41 40 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2609 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision Location LT3 24-Hour Noise Data
Rec 1 to 24 Slow Response dBA weighting 0.5 dB resolution stats Date hh:mm:ss LeqPeriod Leq Lmax Lmin L1% L5% L10% L50% L90% 10/16/2018 11:44 1.0 hour 60.9 91.9 35.7 59 51.5 49.5 42.5 38.5 10/16/2018 12:44 1.0 hour 46.5 64.4 38.3 57.5 50 47.5 43 40.5 10/16/2018 13:44 1.0 hour 44.1 64.8 38.5 51 47 45.5 42.5 40 10/16/2018 14:44 1.0 hour 46 61.6 38.6 53.5 49.5 48 44.5 42.5 10/16/2018 15:44 1.0 hour 46.7 63.6 38.6 57 51 48 44 41.5 10/16/2018 16:44 1.0 hour 48.2 69.5 38.5 60 54.5 48 42.5 40.5 10/16/2018 17:44 1.0 hour 46.6 63.7 38.4 57.5 50 48 43.5 40.5 10/16/2018 18:44 1.0 hour 51.2 72.5 39.8 59.5 55 54.5 47.5 42.5 10/16/2018 19:44 1.0 hour 51.3 56.1 38.6 55 54 53 50.5 50 10/16/2018 20:44 1.0 hour 46.2 60.6 35.7 52.5 51 50.5 42.5 39 10/16/2018 21:44 1.0 hour 43.7 64 35.7 52 45 44 40.5 38.5 10/16/2018 22:44 1.0 hour 40.2 50.8 35.7 47 44 42.5 38.5 35.5 10/16/2018 23:44 1.0 hour 38.9 49.1 35.7 44 42 41 38.5 35.5 10/17/2018 0:44 1.0 hour 40.3 58 35.7 47 43 42 38.5 35.5 10/17/2018 1:44 1.0 hour 39.9 51.1 35.7 46.5 43.5 42 38.5 35.5 10/17/2018 2:44 1.0 hour 39.6 55.8 35.7 46.5 43 41 38.5 36 10/17/2018 3:44 1.0 hour 41.2 59 35.7 48.5 44.5 43.5 39.5 38.5 10/17/2018 4:44 1.0 hour 42.8 51.7 38.3 48 46 45 41.5 38.5 10/17/2018 5:44 1.0 hour 45.6 50.6 40.3 48.5 47.5 47 45 43 10/17/2018 6:44 1.0 hour 45.9 65.2 36.7 58.5 52 45.5 39.5 38.5 10/17/2018 7:44 1.0 hour 43.6 65.2 36.3 55 48.5 45.5 38.5 36.5 10/17/2018 8:44 1.0 hour 42.6 57.6 36.7 51 46.5 44.5 39.5 36.5 10/17/2018 9:44 1.0 hour 40.3 54.7 36.7 48 43.5 42 38.5 36.5 10/17/2018 10:44 1.0 hour 43.1 65.2 36.7 53 47.5 44 38.5 36.5 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2610 of 4422 ends

Noise Appendix – RCNM Inputs/Outputs
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2611 of 4422 ends

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date: 3/30/2019
Case Description: Hunter Sub. - Site Preparation
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent Resid. Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Dozer No 40 81.7 20 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 20 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Dozer 89.6 85.6
Dozer 89.6 85.6
Dozer 89.6 85.6
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Total 89.6 92.2
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2612 of 4422 ends

---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent MHP Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Dozer No 40 81.7 65 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 65 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Dozer 79.4 75.4
Dozer 79.4 75.4
Dozer 79.4 75.4
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Total 79.4 82
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2613 of 4422 ends

---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Acoustic Center Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Dozer No 40 81.7 97 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 97 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Dozer 75.9 71.9
Dozer 75.9 71.9
Dozer 75.9 71.9
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Total 75.9 78.5
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2614 of 4422 ends

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date: 3/30/2019
Case Description: Hunter Sub. - Grading
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent Resid. Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Dozer No 40 81.7 20 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 20 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Grader No 40 85 20 0
Scraper No 40 83.6 20 0
Scraper No 40 83.6 20 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Dozer 89.6 85.6
Excavator 88.7 84.7
Excavator 88.7 84.7
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Grader 93 89
Scraper 91.5 87.6
Scraper 91.5 87.6
Total 93 95
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2615 of 4422 ends

---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent MHP Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Dozer No 40 81.7 65 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 65 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Grader No 40 85 65 0
Scraper No 40 83.6 65 0
Scraper No 40 83.6 65 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Dozer 79.4 75.4
Excavator 78.4 74.5
Excavator 78.4 74.5
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Grader 82.7 78.7
Scraper 81.3 77.3
Scraper 81.3 77.3
Total 82.7 84.8
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2616 of 4422 ends

---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Acoustic Center Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Dozer No 40 81.7 97 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 97 0
Excavator No 40 80.7 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Grader No 40 85 97 0
Scraper No 40 83.6 97 0
Scraper No 40 83.6 97 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Dozer 75.9 71.9
Excavator 75 71
Excavator 75 71
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Grader 79.2 75.3
Scraper 77.8 73.8
Scraper 77.8 73.8
Total 79.2 81.3
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2617 of 4422 ends

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date: 3/30/2019
Case Description: Hunter Sub. - Grading
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent Resid. Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 20 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 20 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 20 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 20 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 20 0
Generator No 50 80.6 20 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Crane 88.5 80.6
Welder / Torch 82 78
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Backhoe 85.5 81.5
Gradall 91.4 87.4
Gradall 91.4 87.4
Gradall 91.4 87.4
Generator 88.6 85.6
Total 91.4 94.2
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2618 of 4422 ends

---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent MHP Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 65 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 65 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 65 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 65 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 65 0
Generator No 50 80.6 65 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Crane 78.3 70.3
Welder / Torch 71.7 67.7
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Backhoe 75.3 71.3
Gradall 81.1 77.1
Gradall 81.1 77.1
Gradall 81.1 77.1
Generator 78.4 75.3
Total 81.1 83.9
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2619 of 4422 ends

---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Acoustic Center Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 97 0
Welder / Torch No 40 74 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 97 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 97 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 97 0
Gradall No 40 83.4 97 0
Generator No 50 80.6 97 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Crane 74.8 66.8
Welder / Torch 68.2 64.3
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Backhoe 71.8 67.8
Gradall 77.6 73.7
Gradall 77.6 73.7
Gradall 77.6 73.7
Generator 74.9 71.9
Total 77.6 80.4
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2620 of 4422 ends

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date: 3/30/2019
Case Description: Hunter Sub. - Paving
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent Resid. Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Paver No 50 77.2 20 0
Paver No 50 77.2 20 0
Dump Truck No 40 76.5 20 0
Dump Truck No 40 76.5 20 0
Roller No 20 80 20 0
Roller No 20 80 20 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Paver 85.2 82.2
Paver 85.2 82.2
Dump Truck 84.4 80.4
Dump Truck 84.4 80.4
Roller 88 81
Roller 88 81
Total 88 89
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent MHP Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Paver No 50 77.2 65 0
Paver No 50 77.2 65 0
Dump Truck No 40 76.5 65 0
Dump Truck No 40 76.5 65 0
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2621 of 4422 ends

Roller No 20 80 65 0
Roller No 20 80 65 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Paver 74.9 71.9
Paver 74.9 71.9
Dump Truck 74.2 70.2
Dump Truck 74.2 70.2
Roller 77.7 70.7
Roller 77.7 70.7
Total 77.7 78.8
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Acoustic Center Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Paver No 50 77.2 97 0
Paver No 50 77.2 97 0
Dump Truck No 40 76.5 97 0
Dump Truck No 40 76.5 97 0
Roller No 20 80 97 0
Roller No 20 80 97 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Paver 71.5 68.5
Paver 71.5 68.5
Dump Truck 70.7 66.7
Dump Truck 70.7 66.7
Roller 74.2 67.3
Roller 74.2 67.3
Total 74.2 75.3
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2622 of 4422 ends

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date: 3/30/2019
Case Description: Hunter Sub. - Architectural Coatings
---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent Resid. Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 20 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Compressor (air) 85.6 81.6
Total 85.6 81.6
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Adjacent MHP Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 65 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Compressor (air) 75.4 71.4
Total 75.4 71.4
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2623 of 4422 ends

---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night
Acoustic Center Residential 55 50 45
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 97 0
Results
Calculated (dBA)
Equipment *Lmax Leq
Compressor (air) 71.9 67.9
Total 71.9 67.9
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2624 of 4422 ends

Noise Appendix – Traffic Noise Worksheets
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2625 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Main Street North/West of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019 Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 7,360 PK HR VOL 736
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 45.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 62.6 60.7 58.9 52.9 62.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.3 52.9 46.5 43.5 53.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.1 61.8 52.8 52.6 61.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.2 64.6 60.0 56.0 65.2
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2626 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Main Street North/West of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019 Scenario: Existing + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 7,500 PK HR VOL 750
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 45.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 62.7 60.8 59.0 53.0 62.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.3 53.0 46.6 43.6 53.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.2 61.9 52.9 52.7 61.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.2 64.7 60.1 56.1 65.3
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2627 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Main Street North/West of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019 Scenario: Year 2040 No Proejct BY: J. Leech
ADT 7,960 PK HR VOL 796
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 45.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 63.0 61.0 59.2 53.2 62.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.6 53.2 46.9 43.8 53.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.4 62.1 53.2 52.9 62.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.5 64.9 60.4 56.4 65.6
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2628 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Main Street North/West of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019 Scenario: Year 2040 No Proejct BY: J. Leech
ADT 8,100 PK HR VOL 810
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 45.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 63.0 61.1 59.3 53.3 62.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.7 53.3 46.9 43.9 53.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.5 62.2 53.3 53.0 62.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.6 65.0 60.5 56.4 65.6
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2629 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Main Street South/East of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019 Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 6,960 PK HR VOL 696
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 45.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 62.4 60.5 58.6 52.7 61.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.0 52.6 46.3 43.2 52.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.8 61.5 52.6 52.4 61.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.9 64.3 59.8 55.8 65.0
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2630 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Main Street South/East of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019 Scenario: Existing + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 7,210 PK HR VOL 721
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 45.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 62.5 60.6 58.8 52.8 62.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.2 52.8 46.4 43.4 52.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.0 61.7 52.7 52.5 61.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.1 64.5 60.0 55.9 65.1
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2631 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Main Street South/East of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019 Scenario: Year 2040 No Proejct BY: J. Leech
ADT 8,200 PK HR VOL 820
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 45.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 63.1 61.2 59.4 53.4 62.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.7 53.3 47.0 43.9 53.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.5 62.3 53.3 53.1 62.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.6 65.1 60.5 56.5 65.7
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2632 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Main Street South/East of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019 Scenario: Year 2040 No Proejct BY: J. Leech
ADT 8,450 PK HR VOL 845
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 45.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 63.2 61.3 59.5 53.5 62.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.9 53.5 47.1 44.1 53.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.7 62.4 53.4 53.2 62.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.8 65.2 60.6 56.6 65.8
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2633 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Adams North of Railroad DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 7,340 PK HR VOL 734
SPEED 30
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 60.7 58.8 57.0 51.0 60.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.6 51.3 44.9 41.9 51.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.1 60.8 51.8 51.6 60.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.7 63.2 58.4 54.6 63.8
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2634 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Adams North of Railroad DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 7,440 PK HR VOL 744
SPEED 30
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 60.8 58.9 57.1 51.1 60.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.7 51.3 45.0 41.9 51.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.1 60.9 51.9 51.7 60.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.8 63.3 58.4 54.6 63.8
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2635 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Adams North of Railroad DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 BY: J. Leech
ADT 7,810 PK HR VOL 781
SPEED 30
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 61.0 59.1 57.3 51.3 60.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.9 51.5 45.2 42.1 51.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.4 61.1 52.1 51.9 61.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.0 63.5 58.6 54.8 64.1
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2636 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Adams North of Railroad DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 7,910 PK HR VOL 791
SPEED 30
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 61.1 59.1 57.3 51.3 60.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.0 51.6 45.2 42.2 51.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.4 61.1 52.2 51.9 61.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.1 63.5 58.7 54.9 64.1
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2637 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Railroad (Adams to Hunt) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 9,360 PK HR VOL 936
SPEED 28
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 60.9 59.0 57.2 51.2 60.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.0 51.6 45.2 42.2 51.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.7 61.4 52.5 52.2 61.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.2 63.7 58.7 55.0 64.2
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2638 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Railroad (Adams to Hunt) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 9,720 PK HR VOL 972
SPEED 28
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 61.1 59.2 57.4 51.4 60.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.1 51.8 45.4 42.4 51.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.9 61.6 52.6 52.4 61.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.4 63.8 58.8 55.2 64.4
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2639 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Railroad (Adams to Hunt) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 BY: J. Leech
ADT 9,790 PK HR VOL 979
SPEED 28
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 61.1 59.2 57.4 51.4 60.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.2 51.8 45.4 42.4 51.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.9 61.6 52.7 52.4 61.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.4 63.9 58.9 55.2 64.4
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2640 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Railroad (Adams to Hunt) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 10,150 PK HR VOL 1,015
SPEED 28
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 61.3 59.4 57.6 51.6 60.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.3 52.0 45.6 42.6 52.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.1 61.8 52.8 52.6 61.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.5 64.0 59.0 55.3 64.6
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2641 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Library East of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 1,350 PK HR VOL 135
SPEED 25
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 12 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 49.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 49.7
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 49.7
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -10
RT ANGLE 10
DF ANGLE 20
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9800
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0100
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 46.9 44.9 43.1 37.2 46.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 39.0 37.7 31.3 28.3 37.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.2 44.9 36.0 35.7 44.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 49.9 48.3 44.1 39.8 49.1
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2642 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Library East of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 1,570 PK HR VOL 157
SPEED 25
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 12 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 49.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 49.7
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 49.7
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -10
RT ANGLE 10
DF ANGLE 20
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9800
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0100
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 47.5 45.6 43.8 37.8 47.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 39.7 38.3 32.0 28.9 38.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.9 45.6 36.6 36.4 45.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 50.6 49.0 44.8 40.5 49.7
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2643 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Library East of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 No Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 1,410 PK HR VOL 141
SPEED 25
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 12 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 49.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 49.7
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 49.7
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -10
RT ANGLE 10
DF ANGLE 20
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9800
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0100
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 47.1 45.1 43.3 37.3 46.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 39.2 37.9 31.5 28.5 38.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.4 45.1 36.2 35.9 45.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 50.1 48.5 44.3 40.0 49.2
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2644 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Library East of Adams DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 No Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 1,630 PK HR VOL 163
SPEED 25
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 12 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 49.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 49.7
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 49.7
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -10
RT ANGLE 10
DF ANGLE 20
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9800
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0100
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 47.7 45.8 44.0 38.0 47.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 39.9 38.5 32.1 29.1 38.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 47.0 45.7 36.8 36.6 45.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 50.8 49.2 45.0 40.7 49.9
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2645 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Starr (Hunt to Pope) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 2,050 PK HR VOL 205
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 57.1 55.1 53.3 47.3 56.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 48.7 47.3 41.0 37.9 47.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 57.5 56.2 47.3 47.0 56.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.6 59.0 54.5 50.5 59.7
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2646 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Starr (Hunt to Pope) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 2,300 PK HR VOL 230
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 57.6 55.6 53.8 47.8 57.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.2 47.8 41.5 38.4 47.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.0 56.7 47.8 47.5 56.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.1 59.5 55.0 51.0 60.2
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2647 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Starr (Hunt to Pope) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 BY: J. Leech
ADT 2,950 PK HR VOL 295
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 58.6 56.7 54.9 48.9 58.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.3 48.9 42.5 39.5 49.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 59.1 57.8 48.9 48.6 57.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.2 60.6 56.1 52.0 61.3
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2648 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Starr (Hunt to Pope) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 3,200 PK HR VOL 320
SPEED 35
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 59.0 57.1 55.3 49.3 58.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.6 49.3 42.9 39.9 49.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 59.5 58.2 49.2 49.0 58.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.5 61.0 56.4 52.4 61.6
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2649 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Hunt (North of Railroad) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 2,450 PK HR VOL 245
SPEED 32
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 56.7 54.8 53.0 47.0 56.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 48.5 47.2 40.8 37.8 47.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 57.7 56.4 47.5 47.3 56.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.6 59.0 54.3 50.4 59.6
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2650 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Hunt (North of Railroad) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 2,700 PK HR VOL 270
SPEED 32
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 57.2 55.2 53.4 47.5 56.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.0 47.6 41.2 38.2 47.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.2 56.9 47.9 47.7 56.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.0 59.4 54.7 50.8 60.0
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2651 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Hunt (North of Railroad) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 BY: J. Leech
ADT 3,550 PK HR VOL 355
SPEED 32
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 58.4 56.4 54.6 48.6 57.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.2 48.8 42.4 39.4 48.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 59.3 58.0 49.1 48.9 58.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.2 60.6 55.9 52.0 61.2
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2652 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Hunt (North of Railroad) DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 3,800 PK HR VOL 380
SPEED 32
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 58.7 56.7 54.9 48.9 58.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.5 49.1 42.7 39.7 49.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 59.6 58.3 49.4 49.2 58.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.5 60.9 56.2 52.3 61.5
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2653 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Paseo Grande East of Hunt DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 5,210 PK HR VOL 521
SPEED 30
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 59.2 57.3 55.5 49.5 58.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 51.2 49.8 43.4 40.4 49.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 60.6 59.3 50.4 50.1 59.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.3 61.7 56.9 53.1 62.3
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2654 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Paseo Grande East of Hunt DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 5,420 PK HR VOL 542
SPEED 30
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 59.4 57.5 55.7 49.7 58.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 51.3 49.9 43.6 40.5 50.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 60.8 59.5 50.5 50.3 59.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.4 61.9 57.0 53.3 62.5
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2655 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Paseo Grande East of Hunt DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 BY: J. Leech
ADT 6,520 PK HR VOL 652
SPEED 30
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 60.2 58.3 56.5 50.5 59.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.1 50.8 44.4 41.3 50.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 61.6 60.3 51.3 51.1 60.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.2 62.7 57.8 54.1 63.3
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2656 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Paseo Grande East of Hunt DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Year 2040 + Project BY: J. Leech
ADT 6,730 PK HR VOL 673
SPEED 30
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -45
RT ANGLE 45
DF ANGLE 90
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.127 0.096 0.9700
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.874 0.051 0.075 0.0100
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.891 0.028 0.081 0.0200
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 60.3 58.4 56.6 50.6 59.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.3 50.9 44.5 41.5 51.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 61.7 60.4 51.5 51.2 60.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.4 62.8 58.0 54.2 63.4
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2657 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Silverado South of Mountain DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 11,120 PK HR VOL 1,112
SPEED 42
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -60
RT ANGLE 60
DF ANGLE 120
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.134 0.096 0.9400
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.872 0.053 0.075 0.0250
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.889 0.030 0.081 0.0350
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 66.9 65.0 63.4 57.2 66.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.3 60.9 54.8 51.5 61.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 68.9 67.6 58.9 58.4 67.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.5 70.0 65.1 61.3 70.6
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2658 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Silverado South of Mountain DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 11,560 PK HR VOL 1,156
SPEED 42
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -60
RT ANGLE 60
DF ANGLE 120
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.134 0.096 0.9400
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.872 0.053 0.075 0.0250
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.889 0.030 0.081 0.0350
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 67.1 65.1 63.6 57.3 66.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.5 61.1 55.0 51.7 61.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 69.0 67.7 59.0 58.5 67.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.7 70.2 65.3 61.5 70.7
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2659 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Silverado South of Mountain DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 13,720 PK HR VOL 1,372
SPEED 42
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -60
RT ANGLE 60
DF ANGLE 120
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.134 0.096 0.9400
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.872 0.053 0.075 0.0250
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.889 0.030 0.081 0.0350
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 67.8 65.9 64.3 58.1 67.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.2 61.8 55.7 52.4 62.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 69.8 68.5 59.8 59.3 68.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.5 70.9 66.0 62.2 71.5
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2660 of 4422 ends

FHWA - HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
(modified for CNEL)
PROJECT: Hunter Subdivision EIR JN: 10839
ROADWAY: Silverado South of Mountain DATE: 4/5/2019
Scenario: Existing BY: J. Leech
ADT 14,160 PK HR VOL 1,416
SPEED 42
PK HR % 10
DIST CTL 50
DIST N/F 76 (M=76,P=52,S=36,C=12) AUTO SLE DISTANCE 32.9 DIST WALL 0 MED TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
DIST W/OB 50 HVY TRUCK SLE DIST 32.6
HTH WALL 0.0 ********
HTH OBS 5.0
AMBIENT 40.0
ROADWAY VIEW:

LF ANGLE -60
RT ANGLE 60
DF ANGLE 120
SITE CONDITIONS: (15=HARD SITE, 10=SOFT SITE)
AUTOM 15.0
MED TR 15.0
HVY TR 15.0
BARRIER 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
ELEVATIONS:

PAD 0.0 AUTOMOBILES = 0.00
ROAD 0.0 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 2.30
HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01
GRADE: 0.0 % GRADE ADJUSTM= 0.0 (TO HEAVY TRUCKS)
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION:

DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY
AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.134 0.096 0.9400
MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.872 0.053 0.075 0.0250
HEAVY TRUCKS 0.889 0.030 0.081 0.0350
NOISE IMPACTS WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING:

LEQ PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVE LEQ NIGHT CNEL
AUTOMOBILES 68.0 66.0 64.4 58.2 67.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.4 62.0 55.8 52.6 62.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 69.9 68.6 59.9 59.4 68.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.6 71.1 66.2 62.4 71.6
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2661 of 4422 ends
Page 2662 of 4422 ends

1515 Fourth Street, Napa, CA 94559 www.rsacivil.com (707) 252-3301 v. (707) 252-4966 f.

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT
Technical Memorandum
Results of Preliminary Water Calculations
For:

Hunter Subdivision
St. Helena, CA
APN: 009-030-057
Project No. 4110047.0
September 10, 2020
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2663 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Background ................................................................................................................ 1 II. Existing Theoretical Domestic Water Demand ......................................................... 1 III. Proposed Theoretical Domestic Water Demand...................................................... 1 IV. Landscape Water Demand ........................................................................................ 2 V. Proposed Mitigation.................................................................................................. 2 VI. In-Lieu Retrofit Fees................................................................................................... 2 VII. Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 5

ATTACHMENTS

1. Water Neutrality Calculations

2. Conceptual Landscape Water Use Calculations – Spatial Design Group

3. Municipal Water Saving Measures
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2664 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT

Page 1 of 5 ends

I. BACKGROUND
In order to comply with the City of St. Helena's Water Neutral Policy, RSA+ is submitting to you this water analysis for the proposed Hunter Subdivision. This analysis documents the theoretical proposed water consumption for the new development and the options for water off-set mitigation.

II. EXISTING THEORETICAL DOMESTIC WATER DEMAND
There is no current connection to the City of St. Helena domestic water system. Therefore, the existing demand is zero gallons per day.

III. PROPOSED THEORETICAL DOMESTIC WATER DEMAND
It is our understanding based on communications with the City of St. Helena that the assumed water demand has been established to its satisfaction. The basis is repeated here for continuity.

The proposed development consists of 51 lots with detached 4-bedroom single-family residences, and an additional 25 two-bedroom multi-family residential units will be included in the development. The proposed water demand is calculated based upon water usage from water fixtures and appliances based on the number of occupants as laid out by The City of St. Helena Water Neutral Policy for Development. A list of the water performance requirements for fixtures and appliances follows.

A. Showerheads 8 min/shower/day/occupant
B. Lavatory faucets 0.25 min/3 times/day/occupant
C. Kitchen faucets 4 min/day/occupant
D. Toilets 3 flushes/day/occupant
E. Clothes Washer 0.37 load/day/occupant
F. Dish Washer 0.1 load/day/occupant
Water usage from water fixtures and appliances that meet the minimum requirements of the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code (Title 24, Part 11) and the City of St. Helena Water Neutral Policy.

A. Showerheads 2.0 gallons per minute
B. Lavatory faucets 1.5 gallons per minute
C. Kitchen faucets 1.8 gallons per minute
D. Toilets 1.3 gallons per flush
E. Clothes Washer 19.7 gallons per load
F. Dish Washer 6.3 gallons per load
Following the guidelines of the City of St. Helena policy, the analysis is to be completed based on two occupants per bedroom. Based on the City of St. Helena Water Neutral Policy for Development we have calculated the theoretical domestic water demand to be 17,752 gallons Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2665 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT

Page 2 of 5 ends

per day (19.88 acre-feet per year) for the total development. These calculations can be found attached.

IV. LANDSCAPE WATER DEMAND
Landscape irrigation will be provided by an existing well located at the site, thus landscape usage will not be included in this water neutrality study, as provided for in Municipal Code Section

13.12.010. Preliminary landscape water usage calculations prepared by Spatial Design Group indicated that irrigation will require 17.16 acre-feet. See Conceptual Landscape Water Use Calculations by Spatial Design Group in Attachment 2.

V. PROPOSED MITIGATION
A variety of specific water offset mitigations were listed in our 2017 Report in summary form.

Attached here is the detailed Report with the supporting documentation cited. These may be items that are pursued.

City of St. Helena Staff has asked us to review alternatives similar to those in American Canyon.

Some of these options are converting parks to recycled water and expanding recycled water to other areas are discussed in American Canyon, however we don’t believe that these options are as readily available in the City of St. Helena.

We discussed alternative options with City of St. Helena Public Works Director, Erica Ahmann Smithies, and understand there may be a few projects that could drastically increase the water savings to the City, and provide the offset the project needs. These options include the following and would be funded by payment of the in-lieu fee provided for by City Ordinance:

1. Assist the City in fixing the leaking transmission line between the City and Rutherford.

It’s our understanding there is a substantial amount of water lost as part of the old pipeline.

2. Place/replace water meters that are not in place or functioning improperly.

3. Paying the in-lieu fee to be used by the City for any of the options identified in the attached Report or otherwise selected by the City.

VI. IN-LIEU RETROFIT FEES
The proposed project will result in the use of approximately 17,752 gallons per day. Since the existing parcel had no existing water usage, conservation measures on the site will not be able to achieve neutrality. Therefore, the project proposes to pay an in-lieu retrofit fee equivalent to the cost of retrofitting showerheads, sink and kitchen faucets, and toilets in existing residences to achieve the required water savings.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2666 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT

Page 3 of 5 ends

The theoretical residential water usage for homes with old fixtures are summarized in the table below:

Table 1 - Theoretical Water Use with Old Fixtures
Fixture
Flow Rate
(gal/min
or
gal/flush)
Flow
Duration
(min., flush,
load, etc.)
Daily
Uses per
Occupant
Number
of
Occupants
Gallons
per
Day
Showerheads

2.5 8 1 6 120
Sink Faucets 2.2 0.25 3 6 9.9
Kitchen
Faucets 2.2 4 1 6 52.8
Toilet 2.2 1 3 6 39.6
Total 222
The theoretical residential water usage for homes with retrofitted low flow fixtures are summarized in the table below:

Table 2 - Theoretical Water Use with Retrofitted Low Flow Fixtures Fixture
Flow Rate
(gal/min
or
gal/flush)
Flow
Duration
(min., flush,
load, etc.)
Daily
Uses per
Occupant
Number
of
Occupants
Gallons
per
Day
Showerheads 2 8 1 6 96
Sink Faucets 1.5 0.25 3 6 6.75
Kitchen
Faucets 1.8 4 1 6 43.2
Toilet 1.28 1 3 6 23.04
Total 169
A residence with old fixtures uses 222 gallons per day (gpd), while a residence that has been retrofitted with low fixtures will use 169 gpd. An overall savings of 53 gpd.

The calculation for number of residences which would need to be retrofitted based on the anticipated demand for The Hunter Subdivision are shown in the tables below:

Table 3 - Proposed Water Use Savings
Gallons
Daily Annual
Theoretical Water Use with Old Fixtures 222 81140
Theoretical Water Use with Retrofits 169 61681
Savings 53 19458
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2667 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT

Page 4 of 5 ends

Table 4 – Retrofits Required for Hunter Subdivision
Gallons
Daily Annual
Hunter Subdiv. New Water Demand 17752 6479480
Water Savings per Residence w/Retrofit 53 19458
Number of Residences to Retrofit 333 333
In order to offset the anticipated water demand at The Hunter Subdivision, 333 residences will need to be retrofitted.

The anticipated material and installation costs to retrofit a residence are shown in the tables below:

Table 5 - Retrofit Material Costs Anticipated
Material Cost per
Residence Qty *Cost per Unit Total Cost
Toilet 2 $265.68 $531.36
Lavatory Faucet 2 $140.40 $280.80
Kitchen Faucet 1 $150.12 $150.12
Shower Head 1 $309.96 $309.96
Total Estimated Material Cost per Residence* $1,272.24
Table 6 - Retrofit Installation Costs Anticipated
Installation Cost per
residence Hours Qty
*Cost
per hour Total Cost
Toilet 1.5 2 $65.00 $195.00
Lavatory Faucet 1.5 2 $65.00 $195.00
Kitchen Faucet 1.5 1 $65.00 $97.50
Shower Head 0.5 1 $65.00 $32.50
Total Estimated Labor Cost per Residence* $520.00
Table 7 – Total Estimated Costs of Retrofits
Total estimated cost to retrofit each residence * $ 1,792.24 Number of residences to retrofit $333.00
Total Estimated In-Lieu Fee Retrofit Cost* $596,808.19
Material costs cited in the tables above are based upon sources found on www.amazon.com on August 28, 2020 with an 8% markup for tax for the following fixtures:
- Toilet - Kohler Cimarron Comfort Height two-piece 1.28gpf with Aqua Piston Tech Model #K-3887-0
- Lavatory Faucet - American Standard Tropic Centerset Model #7038201 - Kitchen Faucet - American Standard Monterrey Model #6409170 - Shower Head - American Standard Berwick Model #T430501 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2668 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT

Page 5 of 5 ends

Labor costs cited in Tables 5-7 above for cost per hour are based upon estimates found at http://www.angieslist.com/articles/how-much-does-it-cost-hire-handyman.htm VII. CONCLUSION
The proposed project will result in the use of approximately 17,752 gallons per day. The proposed development will use water efficient fixtures and conservation measures to the maximum extent practicable. The offset of the project water demands may be best met through assisting the City of St. Helena with existing water system improvements via in-lieu fees. The project will pay $596,808 as an in-lieu retrofit fee equal to the cost of retrofitting enough residences with low flow fixtures to achieve savings equal to the proposed use.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2669 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1

WATER NEUTRALITY CALCULATIONS
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2670 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision
Water Neutrality Calculations

1. Occupant Calculation:

Single Family Residences
Total 51 units
4 bedroom units: 51
Apartment Units
Total 25 units
2 bedroom units: 25

2. Proposed Water Usage:

Single Family Residences Fixture
Flow Rate
gal/min. or
gal/flush
Flow Duration
(min., flush,
load, etc.)
Daily Uses
per Occupant
Number of
Occupants
Gallons
per Day
Showerheads 2 x 8 x 1 x 408 = 6528
Sink Faucets 1.5 x 0.25 x 3 x 408 = 459
Kitchen Faucet 1.5 x 4 x 1 x 408 = 2448
Toilet 1.3 x 1 x 3 x 408 = 1591
Clothes Waher 19.7 x 1 x 0.37 x 408 = 2974
Dish Washer 6.3 x 1 x 0.1 x 408 = 257
14257
Apartment Units Fixture
Flow Rate
gal/min. or
gal/flush
Flow Duration
(min., flush,
load, etc.)
Daily Uses
per Occupant
Number of
Occupants
Gallons
per Day
Showerheads 2 x 8 x 1 x 100 = 1600
Sink Faucets 1.5 x 0.25 x 3 x 100 = 113
Kitchen Faucet 1.5 x 4 x 1 x 100 = 600
Toilet 1.3 x 1 x 3 x 100 = 390
Clothes Waher 19.7 x 1 x 0.37 x 100 = 729
Dish Washer 6.3 x 1 x 0.1 x 100 = 63
3494
Total Development Daily Water Usage (gpd) = 17752
Number of Occupants @ 2
per bedroom
408
408
4 bedroom homes. Assume 2:1
ratio. Number of Bedrooms
204
Total number of occupants
100
50 100
2 bedroom units. Assume 2:1 Number of Bedrooms Number of Occupants @ 2 Total number of occupants
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2671 of 4422 ends

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT
ATTACHMENT 2

CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE WATER USE CALCULATIONS

SPATIAL DESIGN GROUP
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2672 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2673 of 4422 ends

Appendix B – Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.

44.1 in./ year
Irrigation
Methodb
1 - Public Low 0.3 Drip 0.81 31593 11701.11 319931.78
2 - Pulic Moderate 0.6 Bubbler 0.81 23455 17374.07 475041.93 3 - Private Low 0.3 Drip 0.81 236095 87442.59 2390855.37 4 - Private Mod 0.6 Bubbler 0.81 103207 76449.63 2090285.77 5 - Private high 0.9 Spray 0.75 9634 11560.80 316095.39 403984 204528.21
7 - Edibles (Beds) 00 0
8 - Orchard 00 0
9 - 00 0
00 5592210.25
6075151.79
The ETWU is less than the MAWA, the proposed water budget complies with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

ETAF Calculations
Regular Landscape Areas
204528
403984

0.51 All Landscape Areas

0.74 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
This worksheet is filled out by the project applicant and it is a required element of the Landscape Documentation Package.

Reference Evapotranspiration (Eto)
Hydrozone # /Planting
Descriptiona
Plant Factor
(PF)
Irrigation
Efficiency
(IE)c
ETAF Landscape Area
(sq. ft)
ETAF x Area Estimated Total
Water Use (ETWU)e (PF/IE)
Regular Landscape Areas

0.37 ETWU Total

0.37 0.74

1.20 Special Landscape Areas

1.00 1.00

1.00 Totals
Totals
Total Area 403984
Average ETAF 0.51
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)e
Total ETAF x Area
Total Area
Average ETAF
Total ETAF x Area 204528.21
aHydrozone #/Planting Description
E.g

1.) front lawn

2.) low water use plantings

3.) moderate water use planting
bIrrigation Method cIrrigation Efficiency
overhead spray 0.75 for spray head
or drip 0.81 for drip
or subsurface bubbler 0.81 for subsruface
bubbler well
dETWU (Annual Gallons Required) =
Eto x 0.62 x ETAF x Area
where 0.62 is a conversion
factor that converts acreinches per acre per year to
gallons per square foot per
year. eMAWA (Annual Gallons Allowed) = (Eto) ( 0.62) [ (ETAF x LA) + ((1-ETAF) x SLA)]
where 0.62 is a conversion factor that converts acre-inches per acre per year to gallons per square foot per year, LA is the total landscape area in square feet, SLA is the total special landscape area in square feet,
and ETAF is .55 for residential areas and 0.45 for nonresidential areas.

Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must be

0.55 or below for residential areas, and 0.45 or below
for non-residential areas.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2674 of 4422 ends

CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE WATER USE PLAN
SCALE: 1"=50'
0 50' 100'
WU 1
Submittal / Revision:

APN: 009-030-057
707-569-6739
325 CARRILLO STREET

SANTA ROSA, CA
S
D
G

SPATIAL
DESIGN
GROUP

ADAMS STREET AND STARR AVENUE

SAINT HELENA, CALIFORNIA
20'

HYDROZONE MAP LEGEND
H
M
L

SUMMARY HYDROZONE TABLE
HYDROZONE Area (sq. ft.) % of Landscape Area

HIGHMODERATE
LOW
9,634
236,095
TOTAL:
103,207
(HIGH) HIGH WATER USE, (MODERATE) MODERATE WATER USE, (LOW) LOW WATER USE

SEE APPENDIX B FOR MAXIMUM APPLIED
WATER ALLOWANCE CALCULATION.

IRRIGATED AREA 403,984

58.5%

2.4%
100%

25.5%

CONCEPTUAL HYDROZONE MAP

MATCHLINE

MATCHLINE
H
H H
H H
H H
H H
H H
H
H H
H
H H
H H
H
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
H
H
H
H
H
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
H
H
H
H
H
H H

H H H H
H
H
H
H
H H
H
H
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L L L
L L
L L
L
L
L
L L
L
L L L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L L
L
L L
L L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L L

L L L L L L
L
L
L L
L
L
L
LL
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
M
M

H H H H
L L
M
M
M
M
M
L
L L
L
LL
L
L
L
L L
L
L
L
L
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M L
M
M
M
L
L
L
L
L

ADAMS STREET

STARR AVENUE

FUTURE STREET

CITY OF SAINT HELENA
009-030-056

CITY OF SAINT HELENA
009-030-056
*P
*P
*P *P
*P
*P
*P
*P

PRIVATE AREAS

HIGHMODERATE
LOW

PUBLIC AREAS
0 31,593
23,455
SUBTOTAL: 55,048SUBTOTAL: 348,936

7.8%

0.0%5.8%

Page 2675 of 4422 ends

Agenda Item #5.7.

HUNTER SUBDIVISION

WATER NEUTRAL REPORT
ATTACHMENT 3

MUNICIPAL WATER SAVING MEASURES
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2676 of 4422 ends

Water saving measures for the City of St. Helena
February 2017
The following outlines opportunities for the City of St. Helena to reduce water consumption and reliance on local water supplies. Measures include indoor and outdoor residential water efficiency upgrades, metering households, providing pre-rinse fixtures to restaurants and industrial kitchens, irrigation system audits and component replacements at public facilities, and aiding wine production facilities to reduce and recapture water used in production. These water saving measures would not only decrease St. Helena’s water demand but would also reduce water and sewer bills. This may be particularly desirable given the February 2017 rate increases1, which have on average increased a family’s water bill annually by $432 or 24%.

Though water use in St. Helena has decreased in recent years, comparisons to nearby communities with similar weather patterns and use requirements suggests that there are likely opportunities for implementing water efficiency measures. The 2016 St. Helena Water and Wastewater Rate Study reports 2015 city water use at 502 million gallons or 1,540 acre-feet, well below the “safe yield water supply” of 1,950 acre-feet (AF)2. Given the City’s population of around 6,000, the per capita water use for St. Helena in 2015 is approximately 220 gallons/day.

According to California Regional Water Use Targets, the San Francisco Bay Region, of which St. Helena is included, has an interim water use target of 144 gallons per capita per day3. The Sonoma-Marin Saving Water Partnership has lead an effort over the past years to reduce per capita water use. This campaign has resulted an average 2015 per capita water use of 100 gallons/day among partner cities. Another comparison is average residential single-family home water use. The 2016 St. Helena Water & Wastewater Rate Study assumes average monthly water use in single family homes to be 8,228 gallons/month. The 2015 Santa Rosa Water Rate Study4 estimates monthly water use in single family homes to be 7,000 gallons/month. All of this suggests that it is reasonable to assume that reducing water use St. Helena is an achievable goal.
1 City of St. Helena Water and Wastewater Rate Study. Hansford Economic Consulting. 2016. http://cityofsthelena.org/sites/default/files/2016%20Rate%20Study%20FINAL.pdf 2 St. Helena General Plan Update 2030. http://www.ci.st-helena.ca.us/sites/default/files/ 04_Public%20Facilities%20and%20Services_040215_0.pdf
3 Urban Water Management Plan, City of American Canyon. Figure 3-1: Region Water Use Targets. 2010. http://www.water.ca.gov/urbanwatermanagement/2010uwmps/ American%20Canyon,%20City%20of/
American%20Canyon%20Final%20UWMP%202010%20Volume%20I.pdf 4 Santa Rosa Water, Water and Wastewater Study. The Reed Group. 2015. http://santarosa.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=763&meta_id=80712 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2677 of 4422 ends

This report provides descriptions of the most advantageous water saving projects for the City of St. Helena. A summary of these addressable water savings are listed below.

Outdoor Water Efficiency Upgrades & Landscape Conversion Replacing turf with water efficient landscaping and auditing existing irrigation systems can reduce peak water use in summer months, resulting not just water savings but also reducing the need for capital expenditures to meet future demand.

According to a 2015 California Urban Water Conservation Council report on Turf Removal & Replacement , average turf-replacement water savings in California rage from between 5 18-83%, depending largely on climate. California Drought Executive Order B-29-15 notes water 6 savings from turf replacement projects can be between 13-70 gallons/year/square foot (sqft).

For the City of Napa, projected savings from turf conversion projects was estimated at 25 gallons/year/sqft. Assuming a conservative water saving estimate of 25 gallons/sqft of lawn replaced, replacing 5 acres of turf could save over 5 million gallons of water or 16.7 AF/ year.

Water Saving Measure Annual Savings (AF) Assumptions
Turf replacement 16.7 Assume 5 acres replaced
School/park Irrigation audits/upgrades 5 Assume 2 parks/schools upgraded Greywater/rainwater harvesting
residential

0.65 Assume systems installed at 20
homes
Swimming pool covers 0.25 Assume 10 covers installed
Residential household metering 5.8 Assume meters on 247 mobile homes
Indoor water efficiency upgrades,
residential

8.1 Assume 200 homes upgraded
Pre-rinse valves for commercial/
industrial kitchens

1.3 Assume upgrades to 10% of
commercial kitchens
Winery production water recapture 4.6 Assume moderate production facility
Cumulative savings: 42.4
5 Turf Removal & Replacement, Lessons Learned. California Urban Water Conservation Council. Briana Seapy. March 2015. https://cuwcc.org/Portals/0/Document%20Library/ Resources/Publications/Council%20Reports/Turf%20Removal%20_%20Replacement%20- %20Lessons%20Learned.pdf
6 California Drought Executive Order B-29-15, Directive #3, April 1, 2015. average water savings per square foot turf conversion lawn. Accessed February 12 2017.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2678 of 4422 ends

Landscape irrigation audits at commercial and institutional sites can identify the need for simple changes to controller scheduling or emitter maintenance that can save customers tens of thousands of gallons per year. Smart irrigation controllers, which utilize real time data to optimize irrigation schedules. In the City of Napa, a project installing smart controllers at 25 City parks and 21 school fields saved over 600 AF between 2005 and 2010 at city parks and schools7. This represents an average of over 2.5 AF of annual water savings at each park or school location. St. Helena Unified School District has 4 school campuses and a District Office, and there are 10 City parks that could potentially benefit from irrigation audits and improvements. Given the example from the City of Napa, it is not unreasonable to predict that the City of St. Helena could experience similar water savings. Upgrading irrigation systems at just 2 parks or schools in St. Helena may realize 5 AF/year of water savings per year.

Laundry to landscape systems that use greywater to irrigate landscapes can put to use the 60 gallons/day of water generated from the washing machine to save a family of 4 40,000 gallons of water per year8. Changes to local and California code9 have made it simple to install basic residential greywater systems. Installing greywater systems at 20 homes could save 800,000 gallons of water or 0.25 AF/year.

Rainwater harvesting both at a residential level or for commercial applications also has potential to reduce City water use. The City of St. Helena provides a rebate program for rainwater barrels or cisterns installed over 100 gallons. A 530 gallon Bushman tank filled 6 months out of the year could save 3,000 gallons of water per year. 20 households so equipped could save 0.4 AF/ year. Commercially, rainwater collected in cisterns can be used to augment water needed in landscaping and potentially wine production or other industrial washing purposes. The amount of water saved will depend on weather patterns and how many times the cisterns can be filled in a year, but the savings could be significant.

Covers on swimming pools can also result in water savings. Swimming pool evaporation is reduced by 50% when the pool is covered. Assuming an average sized pool (430 square feet) this coulee mean over 8,000 gallons of water savings per year per newly covered pool10. From a google map search, there appear to be over 100 outdoor pools in St. Helena. Covering just 10 of these pools, therefore, could save 0.25 AF/year.

Metering Residential Households
There is evidence that installing volumetric water meters on previously unmetered single-family homes can result in substantial water savings. In a recent study done on three Northern and 7 City of Napa Urban Water Management Plan. 2010. http://www.water.ca.gov/ urbanwatermanagement/2010uwmps/Napa,%20City%20of/Napa,%20City%20of/ UWMP%202010%20-%20NAPA.pdf
8 http://watersprout.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Integrated-GW-System-Info-Packet-1.pdf.

Accessed February 12 2017.
9 http://www.thegreywaterguide.com/california.html. Accessed February 12 2017. 10 http://www.poolspanews.com/how-to/maintenance/evaporation-study-compares-watersavings-of-covers_o. Accessed February 14 2017.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2679 of 4422 ends

Central California cities, monthly water consumption dropped by 13-21% after six months of metering on previously unmetered homes11. According to the 2016 Rate Study, there are 920 multi-family and mobile home units that are not individually metered, all with an average water use of 5,236 gallons/month. Installing individual meters across these accounts assuming a 13% reduction in water use could save over 23 AF of water per year. Installing meters only at the 247 mobile homes could result in a water savings of 5.8 AF/year.

Indoor Residential Water Efficiency Upgrades
Replacing old water fixtures and toilets is a proven technique for realizing lasting water savings.

The 2016 residential toilet and water fixture program in Santa Rosa, CA, for example, provides a recent example of how homes in St. Helena could be quickly retrofitted. It is estimated that customers on average save 1,100 gallons of water per month after toilets, shower heads, and sink aerators are replaced with water efficient alternatives (assuming toilets replaced are

1.6gallons/flush or higher)12. In Santa Rosa, water efficient toilets, shower heads, and bathroom/ kitchen faucet aerators were installed at 5,500 residential sites in 2016 to realize a water savings of approximately 72.6 million gallons/year13.

Residential developments such as mobile home parks and multi-family dwellings would be particularly advantageous partners to benefit members of the community on on the lowest income scale. There are 920 multi-family and mobile home units in St. Helena. Retrofitting 200 of these homes could realize a water savings of 2.64 million gallons, or 8.1 AF/year.

Pre-Rinse Valves for Commercial & Industrial Water Customers 30% of water in restaurants and industrial kitchens is typically used to pre-rinse dishes. Water efficient pre-rinse valves save 60 gallons of water for every hour of use14. The City of Santa Rosa recently replaced 250 pre-rinse valves in restaurants and commercial kitchens, estimating a water savings of over approximately 36,000 gallons/year for each replaced nozzle15.

Restaurants, schools, industrial kitchens, and tasting rooms in St. Helena could all benefit from water efficient pre-rinse valves. According to Yelp there are over 50 restaurants in St. Helena and over 115 public winery facilities. Providing water efficient pre-rinse valves to just 10% of these facilities could save over 1.3 AF/year.

Water Recapture in Wine Production
11 Impacts of Metering on Residential Water Use in California. Tanverakul, Stephanie A.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, San Jose State University. 2015. 12 Santa Rosa Board of Public Utilities Memorandum Agenda Item 7.1, January 7 2016. http:// santa-rosa.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=713&meta_id=68623 13 Santa Rosa Board of Public Utilities Agenda Item 7.1 Presentation, January 7 2016. http:// santa-rosa.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=713&meta_id=68626 14 http://conserve.restaurant.org/Best-Practices/Save-Water/Pre-rinse-spray-valves 15 Santa Rosa Board of Public Utilities Agenda for January 2 2016, Item 7.1. http://santarosa.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=713 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2680 of 4422 ends

Wineries in St. Helena are the biggest water users. Water use for wine production, particularly during the 60 days of harvest can be particularly high when tanks and vats are washed and sterilized. Between 2.6-6 gallons of water is typically used for each gallon of wine produced just during the wine production phase (does not include water used for irrigation or harvest).

Water purification techniques have been able to successfully recapture up to 99% of wine production process water, resulting in huge water savings. For example, Free Flow Wines in Napa, CA successfully installed a recapture system in 2015, realizing a savings of 1.5 million gallons of rinse water per year16. Installing this type and size of rinse water recapture system could result in a savings of over 4.6 AF/year. Wine industry municipal water customers in St. Helena such as Trinchero Family Estates could benefit from this type of water upgrade.

Conclusion
This is a preliminary investigation on the most feasible measures that could be taken to reduce water use in St. Helena. Further data and analysis would likely identify additional partnerships and opportunities. Though per capita water use in St. Helena has dropped significantly in recent years, comparisons to local counterparts show there are likely many opportunities to further reduce the City’s water demand. This report outlines various water efficiency measures to cumulatively save 42 AF/year. All of this suggests that reducing water use by 12 acre-feet/year in St. Helena is a reasonable goal to achieve.
16 California’s Wineyard Pressed to Turn Less Water Into Wine. Alastair Bland. October 1, 2015. http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/10/07/446096090/california-s-vineyards-pressed-toturn-less-water-into-wine. Accessed February 12 2017.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2681 of 4422 ends
Page 2682 of 4422 ends

Traffic Impact Study
Hunter Subdivision
St. Helena, CA
Prepared for:

City of St. Helena
1480 Main Street
St. Helena, California 94574
Maya de Rosa, Planning & Community Improvement Director Prepared by:
1102 R Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
Contact: Dennis Pascua, Transportation Services Manager APRIL 2021
Revised Nov. 2022
Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2683 of 4422 ends

Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material.

Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2684 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision TIS
10839
i April 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page No.
1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1

1.1 Purpose and Scope of the TIS................................................................................. 1

1.2 Project Description.................................................................................................. 3

1.3 Study Area and Scope............................................................................................. 3

1.4 Congestion Management Program.......................................................................... 9

1.5 Methodology........................................................................................................... 9

1.5.1 Intersections................................................................................................ 9

1.5.2 Future Traffic Forecasts............................................................................ 10

1.5.3 Impact Criteria .......................................................................................... 10 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS .............................................................................................13

2.1 Existing Street System.......................................................................................... 13

2.2 Pedestrian Facilities.............................................................................................. 14

2.3 Bicycle Facilities................................................................................................... 14

2.4 Transit System ...................................................................................................... 14

2.5 Pope Street Bridge ................................................................................................ 15

2.6 Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................... 16

2.7 Intersection Operations......................................................................................... 19 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC......................................................................................................25

3.1 Trip Generation..................................................................................................... 25

3.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment ........................................................................ 26 4 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT.........................................................................................35

4.1 Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................... 35

4.2 Intersection Operations......................................................................................... 35 5 BUILDOUT (2040) CONDITIONS................................................................................43

5.1 Planned Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Improvements....................................... 43

5.2 Transit System ...................................................................................................... 43

5.3 Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................... 43

5.4 Intersection Operations......................................................................................... 44 5 SPECIAL ISSUES ...........................................................................................................51

5.1 Project Access and Circulation ............................................................................. 51

5.2 Queueing............................................................................................................... 51

5.2.1 Existing Condition .................................................................................... 52

5.2.2 Existing plus Project ................................................................................. 53 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2685 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision TIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
Section Page No.
10839
ii April 2021

5.2.3 Buildout (2040) Condition........................................................................ 55

5.3 Collision Analysis................................................................................................. 58

5.4 Vehicle-Miles of Travel (VMT) ........................................................................... 59

5.5 Parking .................................................................................................................. 59 6 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS........................................................................61

6.1 Existing plus Project ............................................................................................. 61

6.2 Buildout (2040)..................................................................................................... 61 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................64

APPENDICES
A Scoping Agreement
B Traffic Data
C Synchro & Signal Warrant Worksheets
D SWITRS Collision Data

FIGURES
1 Project Site Location and Study Area..................................................................................5 2 Project Site Plan...................................................................................................................7 3 Existing Traffic Controls and Geometrics.........................................................................17 4 Existing Weekday Traffic Volumes...................................................................................21 5 Existing Saturday Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................23 6 Project Trip Distribution & Assignment – Single-Family & Accessory Dwelling Units...................................................................................................................27 7 Project Trip Distribution & Assignment – Multi-Family Housing....................................29 8 Project Trip Assignment – Total (All Uses) ......................................................................31 9 Project Trip Distribution & Assignment – Saturday (All Uses)........................................33 10 Existing plus Project Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.............................................39 11 Existing plus Project Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................41 12 Buildout (2040) Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes....................................................47 13 Buildout (2040) Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.....................................................49 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2686 of 4422 ends

Hunter Subdivision TIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
Page No.
10839
iii April 2021
TABLES
1 Level of Service Criteria for Intersections using HCM Methodology ................................9 2 Study Area Existing Street System Summary ...................................................................13 3 Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS................................................................19 4 Existing Saturday Peak Hour Intersection LOS.................................................................19 5 Weekday Project Trip Generation .....................................................................................25 6 Saturday Project Trip Generation ......................................................................................26 7 Existing plus Project Weekday Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service.........................36 8 Existing plus Project Saturday Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service..........................37 9 Buildout (2040) Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS ...................................................45 10 Buildout (2040) Saturday Peak Hour Intersection LOS ....................................................45 11 Existing AM, PM, and Saturday Peak Hour Calculated 95th Percentile Queues1.............................................................................................................52 12 Existing plus Project AM, PM and Saturday Peak Hour Calculated 95th Percentile Queues1.............................................................................................................54 13 Buildout (2040) AM, PM and Saturday Peak Hour Calculated 95th Percentile Queues1.............................................................................................................56 14 Collision Summary (2014-2018) .......................................................................................58 Agenda Item #5.7.

Page 2687 of 4422 ends
← All documents from this meeting