City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
38 Table 8.3: Water Facilities Costs to Serve New Development Project Name
Total Project
Cost
Allocation To
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
PWTM-1 Napa Intertie Transmission Main $ 5,715,000 11.9% $ 679,042 PWTM-2 WTP Transmission Main 7,954,000 11.9% 945,074
PWFF-1 Zinfandel Ln Fireflow Improvement 144,000 11.9% 17,110 PWFF-2 Inglewood Ave Fireflow Improvement 55,000 11.9% 6,535 PWFF-3 Vintage Ave Loop 20,000 11.9% 2,376
PWFF-4 El Bonita Ave Fireflow 50,000 11.9% 5,941
PWFF-5 Charter Oak Fireflow 76,000 11.9% 9,030
PWFF-6 Crane Fireflow 139,000 11.9% 16,516
PWFF-7 Spring St Fireflow 262,000 11.9% 31,130
PWFF-8 Pine St Fireflow 65,000 11.9% 7,723
PWFF-9 Fulton Ln Fireflow 85,000 11.9% 10,099
PWFF-10 6" Hydrant Lateral Upsize 12,000 100.0% 12,000
PWFF-11 4" Hydrant Lateral Upgrades 15,000 100.0% 15,000 PWRR-1 Future Allowance for Pipeline R/R 3,947,000 0.0% - Total $18,539,000 $ 1,757,577
Source: City of St Helena Integrated Utility Master Plan Potable Water Capital Improvement Plan Summary; City of St. Helena 5-Year Capital Improvements Program FY 2020-21 to FY 2024-25; Willdan Financial Services.
Cost per EDU
Table 8.4 calculates a cost per EDU associated by dividing the total cost of projects allocated to new development identified in Table 8.3 by the growth in EDUs identified in Table 8.2.
Table 8.4: Cost per EDU
Cost Allocated to New Development $ 1,757,577
Growth in EDUs 418
Cost per EDU $ 4,205
Sources: Tables 8.2 and 8.3.
Fee Schedule
The maximum justified fee for water facilities is shown in Table 8.5. The cost per EDU is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on the EDU factors shown in Table 8.1.
The fee per dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.
The total fee includes an administrative charge to fund costs that include: (1) a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, (2) capital planning, programming, project management costs associated with the share of projects funded by the facilities fee, and (3) fee program administrative costs Agenda Item #12.7.
City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
39 including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Table 8.5: Maximum Justified Water Facilities Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average G H = (F-G)/G Cost Per
EDU
EDU
Factor
Base
Fee1
Admin
Charge1, 2
Total
Fee1
Fee per
Sq. Ft.3
Current
Fee4
Percent
Difference
Residential Dwelling Unit 5 $ 4,205 0.92 $ 3,869 $ 77 $ 3,946 $ 1.41 $ 3.14 (55.1%) Nonresidential
Commercial $ 4,205 0.20 $ 841 $ 17 $ 858 $ 0.86 $ 5.19 (83.4%) Office 4,205 0.20 841 17 858 0.86 3.19 (73.0%)
Industrial 4,205 0.17 715 14 729 0.73 3.89 (81.2%)
Hotel 4,205 0.14 589 12 601 2.40 5.23 (54.0%)
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit, per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential or per hotel room. 3 Assumes an average of 2,802 square feet per dw elling unit based on City building permit data from 2011 to 2020. 4 Current fee show n is the single family fee per square foot. 5 Average EDU factor per residential dw elling unit w eighted by projected single family and multifamily development.
Sources: Tables 8.1 and 8.4; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Agenda Item #12.7.
40 9. Wastewater Facilities
This chapter details an analysis of the need for wastewater facilities to accommodate growth within the City of St. Helena. This projects and associated costs in this chapter were identified it the City’s Integrated Utility Master Plan, 2021. It documents a reasonable relationship between new development and a wastewater facilities impact fee to fund wastewater facilities that serve new development.
Wastewater Demand
Estimates of new development and its consequent increased wastewater demand provide the basis for calculating the wastewater facilities fee. The need for wastewater facilities improvements is based on the wastewater demand placed on the system by development. A typical measure of demand is a flow generation rate, expressed as the number of gallons per day generated by a specific type of land use. Flow generation rates are a reasonable measure of demand on the City’s system of wastewater improvements because they represent the average rate of demand that will be placed on the system per land use designation.
Table 9.1 shows the calculation of equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) demand factors based on flow generation by land use category. The flow generation estimates based on data from the City’s Integrated Master Plan. EDU factors express water flow from each land use in terms of the flow generated by a single family dwelling unit.
Table 9.1: Wastewater Demand by Land Use
Land Use Type
DU or KSF or
Hotel Rooms
per Acre
GPD per
Acre
Average
Flow
Generation/
DU, KSF,
Room
Equivalent
Dwelling
Unit (EDU)
Residential
Single Family 5.00 730 146 1.00
Multifamily 28.00 1,300 46 0.32
Nonresidential
Commercial1
21.78 1,090 50 0.34
Office1 21.78 1,090 50 0.34
Industrial1
21.78 960 44 0.30
Hotel Rooms 30.00 1,090 36 0.25
Sources: St. Helena 2040 General Plan; Table 4.8, City of St. Helena Integrated Utility Master Plan; Willdan Financial Services.
1 Nonresidential densities are based on a maximum floor-area-ratio of 0.5 for commercial, office and industrial.
EDU Generation by New Development
Table 9.2 shows the estimated EDU generation from new development through 2040. The EDU factors from Table 9.1 are multiplied by the land use assumptions from Table 2.1 to estimate total Agenda Item #12.7.
City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
41 EDUs in the base year, at the planning horizon and for new development. New development will generate approximately 529 new EDUs through 2040, comprising 14.6% of wastewater demand in the City at that time.
Table 9.2: Wastewater Facilities Equivalent Dwelling Units EDU
Factor1
Existing
(DU/KSF)
Projected
Growth
(DU/KSF)
Existing
EDUs
Growth in
EDUs Total
Residential
Single Family 1.00 2,018 172 2,018 172 2,190
Multifamily 0.32 838 72 268 23 291
Subtotal 2,856 244 2,286 195 2,481
Nonresidential
Commercial 0.34 782 326 266 111 377
Office 0.34 222 93 76 31 107
Industrial 0.30 1,536 641 461 192 653
Subtotal 2,540 1,059 802 334 1,136
Total 3,088 529 3,617
Percent of Total 85.4% 14.6% 100.0%
1 Per dw elling unit (residential) or thousand building square feet (nonresidential).
Sources: Tables 2.1 and 9.1.
Facility Needs and Costs
Table 9.3 identifies the planned water facilities to be funded by the fee. The new wastewater facilities were all identified in the City’s Draft Integrated Master Plan. Since wastewater facilities projects will benefit both existing development and new development, capacity expanding projects are allocated to new development based on new development’s share of wastewater demand at the planning horizon (see Table 9.2). Projects that are needed solely as a result of new development are allocated completely to the impact fee program. Projects that do not expand capacity are not allocated to the impact fee.
Agenda Item #12.7.
City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
42 Table 9.3: Wastewater Facilities Allocation to New Development Project Name
Total Project
Cost
Allocation To
New
Development
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
WWTP Phase 1 Upgrades $14,320,341 14.6% $ 2,090,770
Crinella Pump Station Upgrades 982,000 14.6% 143,372
Wet Weather Flow Monitoring 50,000 14.6% 7,300
WWTP Recycled Pipeline and Pump Station 130,000 14.6% 18,980 WWGM-1 Madrona Avenue 201,000 14.6% 29,346
WWGM-2 Railroad Avenue 512,000 14.6% 74,752
WWGM-3 Valley View Street 244,000 14.6% 35,624
WWGM-4 Mitchell Drive 245,000 14.6% 35,770
WWGM-5 Mitchell Drive & Main Street 255,000 14.6% 37,230 WWGM-6 Del Campo Court 608,000 14.6% 88,768
WWGM-7 Signorelli Circle 923,000 14.6% 134,758
WWGM-8 Adams Street 206,000 14.6% 30,076
WWGM-9 Pope Street 235,000 14.6% 34,310
WWGM-10 Birch Avenue 386,000 14.6% 56,356
WWGM-11 Main Street 88,000 14.6% 12,848
WWGM-12 Spring Street 53,000 14.6% 7,738
WWLS-1 Crinella Lift Station Odor Control Study - 0.0% - WWRR-1 CCTV Inspection Program, 1st Phase 222,000 0.0% - WWRR-2 Flow Monitoring Program 60,000 14.6% 8,760
WWRR-3 High Priority Pipeline Replacement 2,677,000 0.0% - WWRR-4 Model Update and System Analysis 50,000 14.6% 7,300 WWRR-5 CCTV Inspection, Phase 2 657,000 0.0% -
WWRR-6 Address R/R Needs from Phase 1 CCTV
Program 3,579,000 0.0% -
Total $26,683,341 $ 2,854,058
Source: City of St Helena Integrated Utility Master Plan Sew er Capital Improvement Plan Summary; City of St. Helena 5-Year Capital Improvements Program FY 2021-22 to FY 2025-26; Table 9.2, Willdan Financial Services.
Cost per EDU
The cost of planned facilities allocated to new development in Table 9.3 is divided by the total growth in EDUs to determine a cost per EDU. Table 9.4 displays this calculation.
Table 9.4: Cost per EDU
Cost Allocated to New Development $ 2,854,058
Growth in EDUs 529
Cost per EDU $ 5,395
Sources: Tables 9.2 and 9.3.
Agenda Item #12.7.
City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
43 Fee Schedule
The maximum justified fee for wastewater facilities is shown in Table 9.5. The cost per EDU is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on the EDU factors shown in Table 9.1.
The fee per dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.
The total fee includes an administrative charge to fund costs that include: (1) a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, (2) capital planning, programming, project management costs associated with the share of projects funded by the facilities fee, and (3) fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Table 9.5: Maximum Justified Wastewater Facilities Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average G H = (F-G)/G Cost Per
EDU
EDU
Factor
Base
Fee1
Admin
Charge1, 2
Total
Fee1
Fee per Sq.
Ft.3
Current
Fee4
Percent
Difference
Residential Dwelling Unit 5 $ 5,395 0.80 $ 4,316 $ 86 $ 4,402 $ 1.57 $ 3.14 (50.0%) Nonresidential
Commercial $ 5,395 0.34 $ 1,834 $ 37 $ 1,871 $ 1.87 $ 5.19 (64.0%) Office 5,395 0.34 1,834 37 1,871 1.87 3.19 (41.4%)
Industrial 5,395 0.30 1,619 32 1,651 1.65 3.89 (57.6%)
Hotel 5,395 0.25 1,349 27 1,376 5.50 5.23 5.2%
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit, per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential or per hotel room. 4 Average EDU factor per residential dw elling unit w eighted by projected single family and multifamily development.
Sources: Tables 9.1 and 9.4; Willdan Financial Services. 3 Assumes an average of 2,802 square feet per dw elling unit based on City building permit data from 2011 to 2020. Assumes 250 square feet per hotel room.
2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Agenda Item #12.7.
44 10. AB 602 Requirements
On January 1, 2022, new requirements went into effect for California jurisdictions implementing impact fees. Among other changes, AB 602 added Section 66016.5 to the Government Code, which set guidelines for impact fee nexus studies. Four key requirements from that section which concern the nexus study are reproduced here:
66016.5. (a) (2) When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.
66016.5. (a) (4) If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.
66016.5. (a) (5) A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development. A local agency that imposes a fee proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units of the development shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. 66016.5. (a) (6) Large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study.
Compliance with AB 602
The following sections describe this study’s compliance with the new requirements of AB 602. 66016.5. (a) (2) - Level of Service
1. For fees calculated under the existing standard methodology, the fees are calculated such that new development funds facilities at the existing level of service. These fee categories are: public safety facilities, civic facilities, and parks. The existing level service in terms of the existing facility investment per capita is shown in each corresponding chapter.
2. For fees calculated under the planned facilities methodology, the fees are calculated to ensure that the level of service does not fall to unacceptable levels. The fees calculated under this approach are the transportation, water, wastewater, and storm drain facilities impact fees.
Projects were identified in the City’s Integrated Master Plan as necessary to maintain an acceptable level of service.
66016.5. (a) (4) – Review of Original Fee Assumptions
While the original fee schedules and corresponding revenue generated were reviewed by the City and Willdan prior to conducting the nexus study analysis, the proposed fees are not increasing, so further review is not necessary.
Table 10.1 displays annual fee revenue collected, by impact fee fund.
Agenda Item #12.7.
City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
45 Table 10.1: Annual Collected Impact Fee Revenue
FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19 FY2019-20 FY2020-21 FY2021-22 FY2022-23 Average
(FY17 to
FY23)
Public Safety $ 41,193 $ 17,628 $ 56,109 $ 92,033 $ 16,527 $ 19,863 $ 32,303 $ 39,379 Civic Improvement 61,769 35,319 77,790 137,549 19,879 29,314 59,179 60,114 Parks 199,462 165,180 257,861 411,746 54,379 97,973 208,983 199,369 Traffic 71,784 27,379 225,273 215,911 33,414 33,989 56,410 94,880 Storm Drain 22,714 18,260 55,456 85,365 9,797 15,974 30,676 34,035 Water 57,965 27,084 62,775 120,433 16,238 21,158 32,528 48,312 Sewer 14,902 13,050 17,488 30,433 6,237 5,904 8,743 13,822 Source: City of St. Helena.
66016.5. (a) (5) – Residential Fees per Square Foot
Impact fees for residential land uses are calculated per square foot and comply with AB 602. 66016.5. (a) (6) – Capital Improvement Plan
Napa County has less than 250,000 residents so jurisdictions within this County are not considered to be large jurisdictions. This study is not required to include a capital improvement plan.
Agenda Item #12.7.
46 11. Implementation
Impact Fee Program Adoption Process
Impact fee program adoption procedures are found in the California Government Code section 66016. Adoption of an impact fee program requires the City Council to follow certain procedures including holding a public hearing. Data, such as an impact fee report, must be made available at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. The City’s legal counsel should be consulted for any other procedural requirements as well as advice regarding adoption of an enabling ordinance and/or a resolution. After adoption there is a mandatory 60-day waiting period before the fees go into effect.
Inflation Adjustment
The City can keep its impact fee program up to date by periodically adjusting the fees for inflation.
Such adjustments should be completed regularly to ensure that new development will fully fund its share of needed facilities. We recommend that the California Construction Cost Index (https://www.dgs.ca.gov/RESD/Resources/Page-Content/Real-Estate-Services-DivisionResources-List-Folder/DGS-California-Construction-Cost-Index-CCCI) be used for adjusting fees for inflation. The California Construction Cost Index is based on data from the Engineering News Record and is aggregated and made available for free by the State of California.
The fee amounts can be adjusted based on the change in the index compared to the index in the base year of this study (2023).
While fee updates using inflation indices are appropriate for periodic updates to ensure that fee revenues keep up with increases in the costs of public facilities, the City will also need to conduct more extensive updates of the fee documentation and calculation (such as this study) when significant new data on growth forecasts and/or facility plans become available. Note that decreases in index value will result in decreases to fee amounts.
While fee updates using inflationary indices are appropriate for periodic updates to ensure that fee revenues keep up with increases in the costs of public facilities, the City will also need to conduct more extensive updates of the fee documentation and calculation (such as this study) when significant new data on growth forecasts and/or facility plans become available.
Reporting Requirements
The City will comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. For facilities to be funded by a combination of public fees and other revenues, identification of the source and amount of these non-fee revenues is essential. Identification of the timing of receipt of other revenues to fund the facilities is also important.
Table 11.1 summarizes the annual and five-year reporting requirements identified in the Mitigation Fee Act.
Agenda Item #12.7.
City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
47 Table 11.1: Mitigation Fee Act - Annual and Five-year Administrative Requirements CA Gov't Code
Section Timing Reporting Requirements1
Recommended
Fee Adjustment
66001.(d)
The fifth fiscal year following the
first deposit into the account or
fund, and every five years
thereafter
(A) Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put. (B) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
(C) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements.
(D) Designate the approximate dates on which supplemental funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
Comprehensive
Update
66006. (b) Within 180 days after the last
day of each fiscal year
(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. (B) The amount of the fee.
(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund. (D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned. (E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended including share funded by fees.
(F) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence.
(G) A description of any potential interfund transfers. (H) The amount of refunds made (if any).
Inflationary
Adjustment
1 Edited for brevity. Refer to the government code for full description.
Sources: California Government Code §6601 and §6606.
Agenda Item #12.7.
City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
48 Programming Revenues and Projects with the CIP
The City maintains a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to plan for future infrastructure needs.
The CIP identifies costs and phasing for specific capital projects. The use of the CIP in this manner documents a reasonable relationship between new development and the use of those revenues.
The City may decide to alter the scope of the planned projects or to substitute new projects if those new projects continue to represent an expansion of the City’s facilities and provide benefit to new development. If the total cost of facilities varies from the total cost used as a basis for the fees, the City should consider revising the fees accordingly.
Agenda Item #12.7.
49 12. Mitigation Fee Act Findings
Public facilities fees are one-time fees typically paid when a building permit is issued and imposed on development projects by local agencies responsible for regulating land use (cities and counties). To guide the widespread imposition of public facilities fees the State Legislature adopted the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act) with Assembly Bill 1600 in 1987 and subsequent amendments. The Act, contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66025, establishes requirements on local agencies for the imposition and administration of fee programs.
The Act requires local agencies to document five findings when adopting a fee.
The five statutory findings required for adoption of the public facilities fees documented in this report are presented in this chapter and supported in detail by the preceding chapters. All statutory references are to the Act.
Purpose of Fee
▪ Identify the purpose of the fee (§66001(a)(1) of the Act).
Development impact fees are designed to ensure that new development will not burden the existing service population with the cost of facilities required to accommodate growth. The purpose of the fees documented by this report is to provide a funding source from new development for capital improvements to serve that development. The fees advance a legitimate City interest by enabling the City to provide public facilities to new development.
Use of Fee Revenues
▪ Identify the use to which the fees will be put. If the use is financing facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in §65403 or §66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the facilities for which the fees are charged (§66001(a)(2) of the Act).
Fees documented in this report, if enacted by the City, would be used to fund expanded facilities to serve new development. Facilities funded by these fees are designated to be located within the City’s sphere of influence. Fees addressed in this report have been identified by the City to be restricted to funding the following facility categories: public safety facilities, civic facilities, transportation facilities, parks and recreation facilities, storm drain facilities, water facilities and wastewater facilities.
Benefit Relationship
▪ Determine the reasonable relationship between the fees' use and the type of development project on which the fees are imposed (§66001(a)(3) of the Act).
The City will restrict fee revenue to the acquisition of land, construction of facilities, infrastructure and buildings, and purchase of related equipment, furnishings, vehicles, and services used to serve new development. Facilities funded by the fees are expected to provide a citywide network of facilities accessible to the additional residents and workers associated with new development.
Under the Act, fees are not intended to fund planned facilities needed to correct existing deficiencies. Thus, a reasonable relationship can be shown between the use of fee revenue and the new development residential and non-residential use classifications that will pay the fees.
Agenda Item #12.7.
City of St. Helena Development Impact Fee Update Study
50 Burden Relationship
▪ Determine the reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of development on which the fees are imposed (§66001(a)(4) of the Act).
Facilities need is based on a facility standard that represents the demand generated by new development for those facilities. For each facility category, demand is measured by a single facility standard that can be applied across land use types to ensure a reasonable relationship to the type of development. For some facility categories service population standards are calculated based upon the number of residents associated with residential development and the number of workers associated with non-residential development. To calculate a single, per capita standard, one worker is weighted differently than one resident based on an analysis of the relative use demand between residential and non-residential development.
The standards used to identify growth needs are also used to determine if planned facilities will partially serve the existing service population by correcting existing deficiencies. This approach ensures that new development will only be responsible for its fair share of planned facilities, and that the fees will not unfairly burden new development with the cost of facilities associated with serving the existing service population.
Chapter 2, Growth Forecasts provides a description of how service population and growth forecasts are calculated. Facility standards are described in the Facility Standard sections of each facility category chapter.
Proportionality
▪ Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees amount and the cost of the facilities or portion of the facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed (§66001(b) of the Act).
The reasonable relationship between each facilities fee for a specific new development project and the cost of the facilities attributable to that project is based on the estimated new development growth the project will accommodate. Fees for a specific project are based on the project’s size. Larger new development projects can result in a higher service population resulting in higher fee revenue than smaller projects in the same land use classification. Thus, the fees ensure a reasonable relationship between a specific new development project and the cost of the facilities attributable to that project.
See Chapter 2, Growth Forecasts, or the Service Population sections in each facility category chapter for a description of how service populations or other factors are determined for different types of land uses. See the Fee Schedule section of each facility category chapter for a presentation of the maximum justified facilities fees.
Agenda Item #12.7.
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ST. HELENA UPDATING CHAPTER 3.32, DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES, OF TITLE 3, REVENUE AND FINANCE, OF THE CITY OF ST. HELENA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES.
WHEREAS, Government Code sections 66000 et seq. empower the City to impose fees and other exactions to provide necessary public facilities required to mitigate the negative effects of new development projects, and the proposed establishment of the development impact fee is based upon the information contained in a development impact fee study prepared by City staff; and WHEREAS, the continued provision of new and expanded facilities and infrastructure is necessary to protect and promote the public health, safety, and welfare of all citizens of the City of St. Helena by reducing adverse effects of urbanization and development; and
WHEREAS, on April 9, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 96-2, which established impact fees for new development. The fees established by Ordinance No. 96-2 were based upon a Development Impact Fee Study issued in March 1996. The new fees became effective on June 9, 1996; and
WHEREAS, a Revised Development Impact Fee Study was completed in February 1997. Based upon the revisions to the original Impact Fee Study, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 97-4 amending Ordinance No. 96-2 consistent with Government Code Section 66000 et. seq.; and
WHEREAS, a Revised Development Impact Fee Study was completed in August 2006. Based upon the revisions to the original Development Impact Fee Study, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 06-6 amending Ordinance No. 97-4 and modifying the development impact fees for new development consistent with Government Code Section 66000 et. seq.; and
WHEREAS, a Revised Development Impact Fee Study was completed in April 2013. Based upon the revisions to the original Development Impact Fee Study, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2013-2 amending Ordinance No. 06-6 and modifying the development impact fees for new development consistent with Government Code Section 66000 et. seq.; and
WHEREAS, a Revised Development Impact Fee Study was completed October 2023. Based upon the October 2023 Development Impact Fee Study, the City Council finds that the following changes to Ordinance No. 06-06, as previously amended by Ordinance No. 2013-2, are consistent with Government Code Section 66000 et. seq. and shall be adopted; and
Agenda Item #12.7.
WHEREAS, it is necessary to implement certain updates to the City’s development impact fees to assure that all development within the City pays its fair share of the costs of providing necessary public facilities and infrastructure to accommodate such new development; and
WHEREAS, the proposed increases in existing development impact fees are based upon the information contained in the documents prepared by City staff and Willdan Financial Services, entitled “Development Impact Fee Update Study”, dated October 17, 2023; and
WHEREAS, detailed descriptions of the public infrastructure facilities and improvements covered by the updated development impact fees, as well as their approximate location, size, time of availability, and estimated costs are also set forth in the Development Impact Fee Update Study; and
WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Update Study complies with applicable state law by establishing the basis for the imposition of the updated fees—in particular, the Study:
1. Identifies the purpose of the proposed updated fees;
2. Identifies the use to which the fees will be put;
3. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between use of the fees and the types of projects on which the fees are imposed;
4. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of developments on which the fees are imposed; and
5. Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fees and the cost of the public facilities or portions of the facilities attributable to the developments on which the fees are imposed.
WHEREAS, the development impact fees collected by the City shall be used to finance the public infrastructure facilities and improvements described or identified in the Development Impact Fee Update Study; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Development Impact Fee Update Study is on file in the City Clerk’s office and was made available for public review in accordance with state law; and
WHEREAS, the City published notice of the public hearing required under state law in accordance with Government Code sections 6062(a) and 66018; and WHEREAS, the increase of development impact fees is statutorily and categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because the setting of development impact fees merely establishes a funding mechanism for the provision of future projects and, as such, this Ordinance is not “an essential step culminating in action which may affect the environment” and Agenda Item #12.7.
environmental review required under CEQA will be performed when projects funded by the development impact fees are chosen and defined (Kaufman & Broad-South Bay, Inc. v. Morgan Hill Unified School District (1993) 9 Cal.App.4th 464).
NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of St. Helena does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Recitals
The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Ordinance.
Section 2: Adoption
In connection with the updates to Chapter 3.32 of the St. Helena Municipal Code set forth in this Ordinance, the City Council also hereby adopts the Development Impact Fee Update Study, which is on file with the City Clerk and available for public inspection.
Section 3: Repeal
Ordinance No. 2013-2 is hereby repealed upon the effective date of this Ordinance.
Section 4: Amendment
Chapter 3.32 of the St. Helena Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows (new language is underlined, deletions are in strikeout):
“3.32.010 Findings.
In order to implement the goals and objectives of the general plan of the city of St. Helena and to mitigate the impacts caused by new development within the city, certain public improvement projects must be or had to be constructed. The city council determines that development impact fees are needed to finance these public improvements and to pay for development’s fair share of the construction costs of these improvements. In establishing the fees described in the following sections, the city council finds the fees adopted to be consistent with state law (California Government Code Section 66000 et seq.) and with the city’s general plan and, pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.2, has considered the effects of the fees and Agenda Item #12.7.
determines that the fees are not material with respect to the city’s housing needs as established in the housing element of the St. Helena general plan.
3.32.020 Description of fees.
A. Development impact fees are hereby established on new development or conversions within the city of St. Helena to pay for public improvements related to civic improvement projects, public safety, sewer projects, water projects, traffic mitigation, parks and storm drainage. In the following sections, the city council sets forth the specific amount of the development fee for each type of public improvement project.
B. At least every five years, the city council shall review these fees to determine whether the fee amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of development and whether the public improvement projects described in the city’s capital improvement projects list are still needed. Failure to undertake this review shall not invalidate the imposition of the fees.
3.32.030 Limited use of fees.
The revenues raised by payment of these development impact fees shall each be placed in separate and special impact fund accounts, and such revenues, along with any interest earnings on each separate account, shall be used solely to:
A. Pay for the city’s future construction of those public improvement projects at least partially allocable to new development or conversions as described in the city’s capital improvement projects list; or
B. Reimburse the city for those described or listed projects constructed by the city with funds advanced by the city from other sources; or C. Reimburse developers who have been required or permitted by Section 3.32.110 to install such listed facilities which are oversized with supplemental size, length or capacity.
3.32.040 Imposition of fees.
A. Development impact fees shall be imposed on:
1. New development; and
Agenda Item #12.7.
2. Conversions, as provided in this chapter.
B. Development impact fees shall be paid by the owner of the property on which new development or conversion is to occur. The fees shall be collected by the city prior to the issuance of the building or development permit(s) for such development or conversion, whichever occurs later, unless payment at a later time is mandated by Government Code Section 66007.
C. Except as otherwise provided herein, square footage of residential and nonresidential buildings shall be measured by exterior dimensions. Unfinished attics, crawlspaces, and basements shall not be assessed until converted and finished as usable floor space.
D. A building or structure consisting of nonusable floor space, e.g., a garage, carport or storage shed, shall not be deemed to be part of the residential building for the purpose of determining the square footage of the residential building. Such ancillary structures shall require the payment of storm drainage and public safety impact fees; additional impact fees shall not be required until converted to usable floor space.
E. Each single-family residential unit within a multifamily residential building or development project shall be deemed to be a separate building for which a fee is imposed and shall be paid.
F. Additions to an existing building shall be deemed to occur whenever the amount of usable floor space is increased, or whenever new building space is constructed where no structures existed as part of the existing building, whether or not the total building floor area is increased by the new construction.
G. The first seventy (70) square feet of additions or conversions to an existing building in a two-year period shall be exempt from all fees except public safety impact fees and storm drainage impact fees.
H. No development impact fee shall be imposed more than once for the same floor space.
I. Each tenant space in a multi-use building or development project shall be deemed to be a separate use for which a fee is imposed and shall be paid.
3.32.050 Public safety impact fees.
Agenda Item #12.7.
A. Findings. The city council finds:
1. Numerous items of capital equipment are urgently needed for the city’s police and fire protection facilities to maintain the existing level of police and fire protection services to all areas of the city of St. Helena.
2. New development or conversions within the city of St. Helena result in increased usage of residential, commercial, industrial, and other affected properties, which thereby increases the service requirements and the capital equipment requirements of the city’s police and fire safety services. Such increased usage does not ordinarily result from mere subdivision or parcel map divisions of existing properties in the absence of new development or conversions.
3. The city must continue to fund capital additions to its public safety system. These capital improvements include expanding the police and fire department facilities and equipment. These additional capital expenditures are necessary to maintain an acceptable level of public safety service within the next fifteen (15) years.
4. In the absence of the imposition of a public safety impact fee upon all building permits, the additional capital expenses necessary to maintain an acceptable level of public safety services for the entire city would be unfairly imposed upon the owners and residents of the existing buildings and improvements within the city of St. Helena.
5. New development or conversions without the payment of fees imposed by this section would not be fair to the owners and occupants of existing buildings within the city of St. Helena.
6. The facts and evidence presented in the city’s impact fee study establish that there exists a reasonable relationship between the need for the fire and police department and other public safety improvements and the impacts of the types of new development or conversions for which a corresponding fee is charged. A reasonable relationship or nexus also exists between the fee’s use and the type of new development or conversions for which the fee is charged.
B. Schedule of Public Safety Impact Fees. A schedule of public safety impact fees will be established by City Council resolution.
Agenda Item #12.7.
A public safety impact fee of one dollar four cents ($1.04) per square foot shall be imposed on all new development or conversions. The same impact fee rate shall apply to both residential and nonresidential construction within the city of St. Helena.
C. There is hereby established and created a fund of the city entitled “public safety impact fund” and all revenues derived from and monies collected under this section, including accrued interest thereon, shall be deposited in such fund. The public safety impact fund is established for the sole purpose of providing monies for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of facilities and equipment and other capital purposes needed for the city’s fire department and the city’s police department in providing police and fire protection services.
3.32.060 Civic improvement impact fees.
A. Findings. The city council finds:
1. Numerous items of civic improvements are needed to maintain an acceptable level of the existing and future civic activities for all areas of the city of St. Helena.
2. New development or conversions within the city of St. Helena result in increased usage of residential, commercial, industrial, and other affected properties, which thereby increases the service requirements and the capital equipment requirements of the city’s library, administrative facilities, and other civic facilities. Such increased usage does not ordinarily result from mere subdivision or parcel map divisions of existing properties in the absence of new development or conversions.
3. The city must continue to fund civic improvements within the city.
These civic improvements include expanding the city hall and the library. These additional capital expenditures are necessary to maintain an acceptable level of the civic activities available in St. Helena within the next fifteen (15) years.
4. In the absence of the imposition of a civic improvement impact fee upon new development or conversions, the additional capital expenses necessary to maintain an acceptable level of civic services for the entire city would be unfairly imposed upon the owners and residents of the existing buildings and improvements within the city of St. Helena.
Agenda Item #12.7.
5. New development or conversions without the payment of fees imposed by this section would not be fair to the owners and occupants of existing buildings within the city of St. Helena.
6. The facts and evidence presented in the city’s impact fee study establish that there exists a reasonable relationship between the need for libraries, city administration, and other civic improvements and the impacts of the types of new development or conversions for which a corresponding fee is charged. A reasonable relationship or nexus also exists between the fee’s use and the type of new development or conversions for which the fee is charged.
B. Schedule of Civic Improvement Impact Fees. A schedule of civic improvement impact fees will be established by City Council resolution.
1. A civic improvement impact fee of one dollar ninety-five cents ($1.95) per square foot shall be imposed on all new residential development or conversions.
2. A civic improvement impact fee of one dollar ninety-five cents ($1.95) per square foot shall be imposed on all new commercial/retail development and conversions.
3. A civic improvement impact fee of one dollar ninety-five cents ($1.95) per square foot shall be imposed on all new office development and conversions.
4. A civic improvement impact fee of one dollar ninety-five cents ($1.95) per square foot shall be imposed on all new industrial development and conversions.
5. A civic improvement impact fee of one dollar ninety-five cents ($1.95) per square foot shall be imposed on all new lodging development and conversions.
C. There is hereby established and created a fund of the city entitled “civic improvement impact fund” and all revenues derived from and monies collected under this section, including accrued interest thereon, shall be deposited in such fund. The civic improvement impact fund is established for the sole purpose of providing monies for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of city hall, the St. Helena library, community facilities, and equipment and other capital purposes needed for providing civic services.
3.32.065 Park impact fees.
A. Findings. The city council finds:
Agenda Item #12.7.
1. Additional park facilities are needed to accommodate future growth and maintain an acceptable level of the existing park and recreational facilities for all areas of the city of St. Helena.
2. New development or conversions within the city of St. Helena result in increased usage of the existing park and recreational facilities throughout the city, which thereby increases the service requirements and the capital equipment requirements of the city’s parks and recreation facilities. Such increased usage does not ordinarily result from mere subdivision or parcel map divisions of existing properties in the absence of new development or conversions.
3. The city must continue to fund park and recreation improvements within the city. These park and recreation improvements include developing additional parklands, open spaces, and recreational facilities. These additional capital expenditures are necessary to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare by assuring an acceptable level of the park and recreation facilities is available in St. Helena within the next fifteen (15) years.
4. In the absence of the imposition of a park improvement impact fee upon new development or conversions, the additional capital expenses necessary to maintain an acceptable level of civic services for the entire city would be unfairly imposed upon the owners and residents of the existing buildings and improvements within the city of St. Helena.
5. New development or conversions without the payment of fees imposed by this section would not be fair to the owners and occupants of existing buildings within the city of St. Helena.
6. The facts and evidence presented in the city’s impact fee study establish that there exists a reasonable relationship between the need for parks and other recreation facilities and the impacts of the types of new development or conversions for which a corresponding fee is charged. A reasonable relationship or nexus also exists between the fee’s use and the type of new development or conversions for which the fee is charged.
B. Schedule of Park and Recreation Impact Fees. A schedule of park and recreation impact fees will be established by City Council resolution.
Agenda Item #12.7.
1. A park and recreation impact fee of seven dollars sixteen cents ($7.16) per square foot shall be imposed on all new low density (single-family) residential development or conversions.
2. A park and recreation impact fee of twelve dollars eighteen cents ($12.18) per square foot shall be imposed on all new medium and higher density (multifamily) residential development and conversions.
C. There is hereby established and created a fund of the city entitled “park and recreation impact fund” and all revenues derived from and monies collected under this section, including accrued interest thereon, shall be deposited in such fund. The park and recreation improvement impact fund is established for the sole purpose of providing monies for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of playgrounds, community facilities, recreation facilities and equipment and other capital purposes needed for providing park and recreation services.
D. The park and recreation impact fees imposed by this section shall not apply to residential development that is subject to the dedication of parkland or the imposition of in-lieu fees, or a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes, as a condition of approval of a tentative map or parcel map pursuant to Section 16.28.040, adopted in accordance with Government Code Section 66477(a), otherwise known as the “Quimby Act.”
3.32.070 Water impact fees.*
A. Findings. The city council finds that:
1. Numerous water system improvements are needed to maintain the existing level of water services for all areas served by the city of St. Helena water enterprise.
2. New development or conversions within the service area of the city of St. Helena water enterprise results in increased usage of residential, commercial, industrial, and other affected properties, which thereby increases the water service requirements and the capital equipment requirements for the storage, treatment and transmission of the city’s water supply. Such increased usage does not ordinarily result from mere subdivision or parcel map divisions of existing properties in the absence of new development or conversions.
Agenda Item #12.7.
3. The city must continue to fund capital improvements to its water system. These capital improvements include updating or replacing water distribution lines, and improving current treatment and storage capabilities.
These additional capital expenditures are necessary to maintain an acceptable level of water service within the next fifteen (15) years.
4. In the absence of the imposition of a water impact fee upon new development or conversions, the additional capital expenses necessary to maintain an acceptable level of water service for the entire service area of the city of St. Helena water enterprise would be unfairly imposed upon the owners and residents of the existing buildings and improvements within the service area of the city of St. Helena water enterprise.
5. New development or conversions without the payment of fees imposed by this section would not be fair to the owners and occupants of existing buildings within the service area of the city of St. Helena water enterprise.
6. Part of the costs associated with the capital improvements to the water system and the debt service on earlier funded water projects are apportioned to new development or conversions to accommodate increased demand for water by new residents and businesses and the increased need for water for fire protection purposes for the new structures associated with new development or conversions.
7. The facts and evidence presented in the city’s impact fee study establish that there exists a reasonable relationship between the need for the water system improvements and the impacts of the types of new development for which a corresponding fee is charged. A reasonable relationship or nexus also exists between the fee’s use and the type of new development and conversions for which the fee is charged.
B. Schedule of Water Impact Fees.
1. A schedule of water impact fees applicable to every person connecting to the City’s water system, converting unusable to usable floor space in existing buildings which are already connected to the City’s water system, or adding to existing buildings which are already connected to the City’s water system will be established by City Council resolution.
2. Every person converting an existing use from one use category (residential, commercial, office, industrial, or lodging) to another use category Agenda Item #12.7.
shall pay a water impact fee equal to the difference, if any, between the fees calculated for existing and new uses as set forth in subsection (B)(1) hereof, except that no water impact fee shall be assessed if a “water-oriented” connection fee had been paid for the building or development project pursuant to the City’s former water connection ordinance.
1. Every person connecting to the city’s water system or converting unusable to usable floor space in or adding to existing buildings which are already connected to the city’s water system shall pay to the city a water impact fee in accordance with the following schedule:
Single-Family: $1.68 per sq. ft.
Multifamily: $1.35 per sq. ft.
Office: $1.72 per sq. ft.
Industrial: $2.29 per sq. ft.
Commercial: $3.33 per sq. ft.
Lodging: $3.36 per sq. ft.
2. Every person converting an existing use from one use category (residential, commercial, industrial or office) to another use category shall pay a water impact fee equal to the difference, if any, between the fees calculated for the existing and new uses as set forth in subsection (B)(1) of this section, except no water impact fee shall be assessed if a “water-oriented” connection fee had been paid for the building or development project pursuant to the city’s former water connection ordinances.
3. No water impact fee shall be assessed on conversions to another use within the same use category. No person shall be entitled to a refund on conversions from a higher rate use category to a lower rate use category.
C. In addition to the above charges set by resolution of the city council or by subsection (B)(2) hereof, all expenses and costs of making a water connection shall be borne by the person making the connection. No connection shall be made to a public water supply except by the city or by written permission from the city.
Agenda Item #12.7.
D. There is hereby established and created a fund of the city entitled “water impact fund” and all revenues derived from and monies collected under this section, including accrued interest thereon, shall be deposited in such fund. The water impact fund is established for the sole purpose of providing monies for equipment, infrastructure, and other capital facilities needed for the acquisition, storage, treatment, and transmission of water for the city of St. Helena water enterprise, to repay principal and interest on bonds issued for the construction or reconstruction of water projects or facilities, and to repay federal and state loans or advances made to the city for the construction or reconstruction of water supplies facilities or infrastructure. * Code reviser’s note: Section 3 of Ord. 15-7 provides: “Every person who paid Water System Impact Fees at the rates established in Ordinance No. 2013-2 shall be given a refund equal to the difference, if any, between the aggregate Water System Impact fees paid and the aggregate Water System Impact fees established by this ordinance; except no refunds will be paid to persons who received City Council approval of a fee adjustment or waiver during the relevant time period.”
3.32.080 Sewer impact fees.
A. Findings. The city council finds:
1. St. Helena has a sewer system that consists of a collection system including public sewers and interceptors leading to the wastewater treatment plant and to the disposal system.
2. New development or conversions in the city of St. Helena have a significant impact on the sewer system. St. Helena was previously under a sewer connection moratorium where the state of California effectively prohibited any new development and conversions in the city since no new sewer connections were allowed. In order to have the moratorium lifted and to allow for more development in the city of St. Helena, the city incurred debt to upgrade and expand the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant.
3. The city must continue to fund capital improvements to its sewer system. These capital improvements include updating or replacing sewer lines, improving current treatment capabilities, and promoting the use of reclaimed water. These additional capital expenditures are necessary to maintain an acceptable level of sewer service and wastewater treatment within the next fifteen (15) years.
Agenda Item #12.7.
4. New development or conversions within the city result in increased usage of residential, commercial, industrial, and other affected properties, which thereby increases the service requirements and the capital equipment requirements for the city’s sewage treatment and disposal system. Such increased usage does not ordinarily result from mere subdivision or parcel map divisions of existing properties in the absence of new development or conversions.
5. In the absence of the imposition of a sewer impact fee upon new development or conversions, the additional capital expenses necessary to maintain an acceptable level of sewer service and wastewater treatment for the entire city would be unfairly imposed upon the owners and residents of the existing buildings and improvements within the city of St. Helena.
6. New development or conversions without the payment of fees imposed by this section would not be fair to the owners and occupants of existing buildings within the city of St. Helena.
7. Part of the costs associated with the capital improvements to the sewer system as well as payments on the wastewater debt service are apportioned to new development and conversions to accommodate increased usage of the sewer system and treatment plant by new residents and businesses.
8. The facts and evidence presented in the city’s impact fee study establish that there exists a reasonable relationship between the need for the sewer system improvements and the impacts of the types of new development or conversions for which a corresponding fee is charged. A reasonable relationship or nexus also exists between the fee’s use and the type of new development or conversions for which the fee is charged.
B. Schedule of Sewer Impact Fees. A schedule of sewer impact fees applicable to every person connecting to the City’s sewer system, converting unusable to usable floor space in existing buildings which are already connected to the City’s sewer system, or adding to existing buildings which are already connected to the City’s sewer system will be established by City Council resolution.
1. Every person connecting to the city’s sewer system or converting unusable to usable floor space in or adding to existing buildings which are Agenda Item #12.7.
already connected to the city’s sewer system shall pay to the city a sewer impact fee in accordance with the following schedule:
Single-Family: $0.45 per sq. ft.
Multifamily: $0.66 per sq. ft.
Office: $0.44 per sq. ft.
Industrial: $0.59 per sq. ft.
Commercial: $0.88 per sq. ft.
Lodging: $0.87 per sq. ft.
2. Every person converting an existing use from one use category (residential, commercial, industrial or office) to another use category shall pay a sewer impact fee equal to the difference, if any, between the fees calculated for the existing and new uses as set forth in subsection (B)(1) of this section, except no sewer impact fee shall be assessed if a “water-oriented” sewer connection fee had been paid for the building or development project pursuant to the city’s former sewer connection ordinances.
3. No sewer impact fee shall be assessed on conversions to another use within the same use category. No person shall be entitled to a refund on conversions from a higher rate use category to a lower rate use category.
C. In addition to the above charges, all expenses and costs of making a sewer connection shall be borne by the person making the connection. No connection shall be made to a public sewer except by the city or by written permission from the city.
D. There is hereby established and created a fund of the city entitled “sewer impact fund” and all revenues derived from and monies collected under this section, including accrued interest thereon, shall be deposited in such fund. The sewer impact fund is established for the sole purpose of providing monies for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of sanitation and sewage facilities, to repay principal and interest on bonds issued for the construction or reconstruction of such sanitary or sewage facilities, and to repay federal and state loans or advances made to the city for the construction or reconstruction of sanitary or sewage facilities and infrastructure.
3.32.090 Storm drainage impact fees.
A. Findings. The city council finds:
Agenda Item #12.7.
1. Numerous items of capital infrastructure are urgently needed for the city’s drainage system to maintain an acceptable level of storm drainage from all areas of the city of St. Helena.
2. New development within the city of St. Helena results in increased usage of residential, commercial, industrial, and other affected properties, which thereby increases the amount of impervious surfaces and irrigation of landscaping which create greater need for and usage of drainage systems within the city. Such increased drainage and usage of the system do not ordinarily result from mere subdivision or parcel map divisions of existing properties in the absence of new development.
3. The city must continue to fund capital improvements to its storm drainage system. These capital improvements include constructing storm drains and storm sewers within the city and conducting a storm drainage and monitoring study. These additional capital expenditures are necessary to maintain an acceptable level of storm drainage within the city in the next fifteen (15) years.
4. In the absence of the imposition of a storm drainage impact fee upon new development, the additional capital expenses necessary to maintain an acceptable level of the city’s drainage system for the entire city would be unfairly imposed upon the owners and residents of the existing buildings and improvements within the city of St. Helena.
5. New development without the payment of fees imposed by this section would not be fair to the owners and occupants of existing buildings within the city of St. Helena.
6. The facts and evidence presented in the city’s impact fee study establish that there exists a reasonable relationship between the need for the drainage improvements and the impacts of the types of development for which a corresponding fee is charged. A reasonable relationship or nexus also exists between the fee’s use and the type of development for which the fee is charged.
B. Schedule of Storm Drainage Impact Fees. A schedule of storm drainage impact fees applicable to new construction of buildings, driveways, parking lots, sidewalks, walkways, patios, decks, and other similar structures, and to any construction of or conversions of an existing building that increase the impervious surface footprint of a parcel, will be established by City Council resolution.
Agenda Item #12.7.
1. A storm drainage impact fee shall be imposed on new construction of buildings, driveways, parking lots, sidewalks, walkways, patios, decks, and other similar structures, and upon any construction of additions or conversions to an existing building that increase the impervious surface footprint of the parcel.
2. The storm drainage impact fee for new development or conversions shall be as follows:
Single-Family: $0.73 per sq. ft.
Multifamily: $0.69 per sq. ft.
Office: $1.65 per sq. ft.
Industrial: $1.65 per sq. ft.
Commercial: $1.65 per sq. ft.
Lodging: $1.28 per sq. ft.
C. New development constructed, added or converted in the area required to pay the drainage fees imposed under Chapter 17.108 shall not be required to pay the storm drainage impact fee required under this section.
D. There is hereby established and created a fund of the city entitled “storm drainage impact fund” and all revenues derived from and monies collected under this section, including accrued interest thereon, shall be deposited in such fund. The storm drainage impact fund is established for the sole purpose of providing monies for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of facilities and equipment and for other capital purposes needed for the city’s storm drainage system and for additional drainage and monitoring studies.
3.32.100 Traffic mitigation impact fees.
A. Findings. The city council finds:
1. New development or conversions within the city of St. Helena result in increased usage of residential, commercial, industrial, and other affected properties, which thereby generates additional traffic within the city and will contribute to the usage and degradation of the existing street infrastructure in the city of St. Helena.
2. The purpose of this fee is to finance circulation improvements to reduce the impacts of traffic generated by new development within the city.
Agenda Item #12.7.
3. The city must continue to fund capital improvements to its traffic circulation system. These capital improvements include building new roads, bridges, and traffic control facilities and equipment. These additional capital expenditures are necessary to maintain an acceptable level of traffic circulation and the city’s roadway system within the next fifteen (15) years.
4. In the absence of the imposition of a traffic mitigation impact fee upon new development or conversions, the additional capital expenses necessary to maintain acceptable traffic circulation for the entire city would be unfairly imposed upon the owners and residents of the existing buildings and improvements within the city of St. Helena.
5. The construction of new development or conversions without the payment of fees imposed by this section would not be fair to the owners and occupants of existing buildings within the city of St. Helena.
6. The facts and evidence presented in the city’s impact fee study establish that there exists a reasonable relationship between the need for the traffic improvements and the impacts of the types of new development or conversions for which a corresponding fee is charged. A reasonable relationship or nexus also exists between the fee’s use and the type of new development or conversions for which the fee is charged.
B. Schedule of Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees.
1. A schedule of traffic mitigation impact fees applicable to new development or conversions within the City will be established by City Council resolution.
1. A traffic mitigation impact fee shall be imposed on new development or conversions within the city of St. Helena.
2. The traffic mitigation impact fee for new development or conversions shall be as follows:
Single-Family Development,
Conversions, Additions: $1.94 per square foot
Multifamily Development, Conversions,
Additions: $2.36 per square foot
Industrial Development, Conversions,
Additions: $3.40 per square foot
Agenda Item #12.7.
Office Development, Conversions,
Additions: $5.36 per square foot
Commercial Development,
Conversions, Additions: $20.89 per square foot
Lodging: $7.98 per square foot
23. Every person converting an existing use from one use category (residential, commercial, industrial or office) to another use category shall pay a traffic mitigation impact fee equal to the difference, if any, between the fees calculated for the existing and new uses as set forth in subsection (B)(12) of this section.
34. No traffic mitigation impact fee shall be assessed on conversions to another use within the same use category. No person shall be entitled to a refund on conversions from a higher rate use category to a lower rate use category.
C. There is hereby established and created a fund of the city entitled “traffic mitigation impact fund” and all revenues derived from and monies collected under this section, including accrued interest thereon, shall be deposited in such fund. The traffic mitigation impact fund is established for the sole purpose of providing monies for the construction and reconstruction of facilities and equipment and other capital purposes needed for traffic circulation improvements in and around the city of St. Helena.
3.32.110 Developer construction of facilities.
A. Whenever a developer is required, as a condition of approval of a subdivision, development permit or building permit, to construct a public facility described in the capital improvement projects list, which facility is determined by the city to have supplemental size, length or capacity over that needed to address the impacts of that development, and when construction is necessary to ensure efficient and timely construction of the facilities network, a reimbursement agreement with the developer and a credit against the applicable impact fee, which would otherwise be charged pursuant to this chapter on the development project, shall be offered. The reimbursement amount shall not include the portion of the improvement needed to provide services or mitigate the need for the facility or the burdens created by the development.
Agenda Item #12.7.
B. A developer who installs an off-site improvement as a special mitigation measure for a project which is identified on the capital improvement projects list to be funded at least partially by impact fees may claim credit on such a fee not to exceed the impact fee payable for the development project. The city’s public works director is authorized to allow such credit.
C. If a developer is dissatisfied with the decision of the city’s public works director regarding a reimbursement agreement or a credit of development impact fees, the developer shall appeal for relief to the city council by filing a written appeal with the city clerk within fifteen (15) days after the disputed decision. The appeal shall state in sufficient detail the basis for the claimed credit. The decision of the city council shall be final.
3.32.120 Fee adjustment.
A. A developer of any project, including any new building or addition to or conversion of any existing building, subject to the fees described in Sections 3.32.050 through 3.32.100 may apply to the city council for a reduction or adjustment of the fee(s), or a waiver of the fee(s), based upon the absence of any reasonable relationship between the nature of the impact of the development and either the amount of the fee charged or the type of facilities to be financed.
B. The application for a fee reduction, adjustment, or waiver shall be made in writing and filed with the city clerk not later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the application for a building permit.
C. The application shall state in detail the factual basis for the claim of waiver, reduction, or adjustment. The city council shall consider the application at a hearing held within thirty (30) days after the filing of the fee adjustment application. The decision of the city council shall be final.
D. If a reduction, adjustment, or waiver is granted, any change in use within the project shall invalidate the waiver, adjustment or reduction of the fee.
3.32.130 Definitions.
A. “Building permit” shall mean the permit required or issued by the city of St.
Helena for the construction, improvement or remodeling of any structure pursuant to the city of St. Helena’s building codes.
Agenda Item #12.7.
B. “City” shall mean the governmental body managing the administrative operations of the city of St. Helena.
C. “City of St. Helena” shall mean all property located within the geographical area within the city of St. Helena’s city limit line.
D. “City of St. Helena impact fee study” shall mean the study, including any amendments or revisions thereto, for the financing of facilities and services designated under the capital improvement projects list for the city of St. Helena. This study includes, but is not limited to, a designation of those facilities to be constructed with the impact fees collected under this chapter, the estimated costs of constructing those facilities or providing the services designated therein, and the total use factors or other criteria utilized to arrive at an allocation of the cost of the facilities to the different types of land uses and to new development.
E. “Conversion” shall mean converting from unusable to usable floor space, or converting the existing use to another use.
F. “Developer” shall mean any person who is the owner or authorized agent of an owner of any new development within the city of St. Helena.
G. “Dwelling unit” shall mean a residential dwelling within the city of St. Helena.
Each single-family residential unit within a multifamily residential building or development project shall be deemed to be a separate dwelling unit.
H. “New development” shall mean the original construction of residential, commercial, industrial or other nonresidential buildings, or the addition of usable floor space within existing residential or nonresidential buildings, or the construction of new accessory buildings.
I. “Owner” shall mean the legal owner(s) or the authorized agent(s) for any owner of property being developed.
J. “Usable floor space” shall mean any interior space constructed or converted to be used for human occupancy in accordance with the Uniform Building Code.
3.32.140 Development agreements.
The terms of any development approvals or building permit(s) may be negotiated as part of a development agreement which may require a developer to provide or Agenda Item #12.7.
finance any public projects deemed agreeable to both the developer and the city council. Development constructed under the terms of a development agreement approved pursuant to Chapter 17.156 may be exempted from the payment of any of the impact fees required under Sections 3.32.050 through 3.32.100.
3.32.150 Inflationary fee increases.
Due to the increases in costs of construction, developing and designing the projects to be financed by the development impact fees set forth herein, such fees shall be automatically adjusted annually commencing July 1, 1998, and every July 1st thereafter. The fee adjustments shall be based on the increase, if any, in the Engineering News Record U.S. twenty (20) city average construction cost index for the June preceding the increase and the June one year prior thereto.” Section 5: Severability.
If any section, subsection, phrase, or clause of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 6: CEQA.
This Ordinance was assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), and the environmental regulations of the City. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance updating the City’s requirements for development impact fees is statutorily and categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because the setting of development impact fees merely establishes a funding mechanism for the provision of future projects and, as such, this Ordinance is not “an essential step culminating in action which may affect the environment” and environmental review required under CEQA will be performed when projects funded by the development impact fees are chosen and defined (Kaufman & Broad-South Bay, Inc. v. Morgan Hill Unified School District (1993) 9 Cal.App.4th 464).
Section 7: Notice and Effective Date.
Agenda Item #12.7.
This ordinance was reviewed at a noticed public hearing, for which the Ordinance, Resolution Establishing Updated Development Impact Fees, and the associated Development Impact Fee Study were available to the general public for a period of not less than 14 days prior to the public hearing. These fees shall apply to the issuance of any building permit for any residential and non-residential development issued 60 days following the passage of this ordinance.
Section 8. Publication.
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same, or a summary of the Ordinance prepared by the City Attorney, to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once, in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of St. Helena, California. .
THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the St. Helena City Council on the day of , 2023, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the St. Helena City Council on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:
Mayor Dohring: _____
Vice Mayor Hall: _____
Councilmember Chouteau: _____
Councilmember Hardy: _____
Councilmember Summers: _____
APPROVED:
___________________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF ST. HELENA
___________________________________
Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk
I, CINDY TZAFOPOULOS, CITY CLERK of the City of St. Helena, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2023. That Agenda Item #12.7.
thereafter said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2023, by the following vote:
Mayor Dohring: _____
Vice Mayor Hall: _____
Councilmember Chouteau: _____
Councilmember Hardy: _____
Councilmember Summers: _____
Agenda Item #12.7.
Development Impact Fee Study Update
City of St. Helena
November 14, 2023
Agenda Item #12.7.
What is a Development Impact Fee?
One-time charge 1
Imposed at building permit stage
Imposed on all development projects
within a defined geographic area
Funds facilities to serve new development
Agenda Item #12.7.
Mitigation Fee Act Findings (Govt. Code §66001)
▪ Key findings
▪ Need: Development creates need for facilities
▪ Benefit: Development use of revenue
▪ Rough Proportionality: Fee amount development’s
share of facility costs
▪ Other findings
▪ Purpose of fee
▪ Use of fee revenue
3 Agenda Item #12.7.
▪ Requires local jurisdictions to make certain
information available on website:
▪ Current impact fee schedule
▪ Nexus studies
▪ Annual AB1600 reports
▪ Five-Year AB1600 reports
▪ Changes to impact fee adoption process:
▪ Prior to adoption of development fees,
an impact fee nexus study needs to be
adopted with 30 days notice
▪ Technical changes:
▪ Residential fees should be charged
per square foot, unless findings are
supported that justify another
metric
▪ Large jurisdictions shall adopt a
capital improvement plan as a part
of the nexus study
▪ Nexus study should identify level of
service
▪ If fees are increasing, review the
assumptions of the original nexus
study and evaluate the amount of
fees collected under the original fee
AB 602
Agenda Item #12.7.
Impact Fees – Basic Methodology
ESTIMATE
EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT
AND FUTURE
GROWTH
IDENTIFY FACILITY
STANDARDS
DETERMINE NEW
FACILITY NEEDS
AND COSTS
ALLOCATE SHARE
TO
ACCOMMODATE
GROWTH
IDENTIFY
ALTERNATIVE
FUNDING NEEDS
CALCULATE FEE BY
ALLOCATING
COSTS PER UNIT
OF NEW
DEVELOPMENT
Agenda Item #12.7.
St. Helena Development Impact Fee Categories
▪Public Safety Facilities
▪Civic Facilities
▪Transportation Facilities
▪Parks
▪Storm Drainage
▪Water
▪Wastewater
Agenda Item #12.7.
Growth Projections
2023 2040 Growth
Residents 5,212 6,600 1,388
Dwelling Units 2,856 3,100 244
Employment 4,164 5,900 1,736
Sources: California Department of Finance (DOF), Table E-5, 2023; St. Helena General Plan Update EIR (2018); U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application.
Agenda Item #12.7.
Cost Allocation Methods:
WHAT Facilities Serve WHO
PLANNED FACILITIES
Planned Facilities
New Demand
EXISTING INVENTORY
Existing Facilities
Existing Demand
Agenda Item #12.7.
Cost Allocation Methodologies
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
Facility Demand Facility Needs
Existing
Demand
Future
Demand
Existing Inventory Method
New
Facilities
Existing
Facilities
Fee $
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
110
120
130
140
150
Future
Demand
New
Facilities
Demand Facility Needs
Planned Facilities Method
Agenda Item #12.7.
Fee Program Methodologies
Public safety facilities
Civic facilities
Parks
Existing Standard
Transportation
Storm drain
Water
Wastewater
Planned Facilities
Agenda Item #12.7.
Projected Impact Fee Revenue
Fee Category Net Project Cost
Projected Impact
Fee Revenue
Additional
Funding
Required
Public Safety $ 3,730,662 $ 3,730,662 $ -
Civic Facilities 4,589,658 4,589,658 -
Transportation Facilities 18,799,000 4,060,584 14,738,416 Parks 7,771,000 7,771,000 -
Storm Drainage 19,273,000 2,356,359 16,916,641
Water 18,539,000 1,757,577 16,781,423
Wastewater 26,683,341 2,854,058 23,829,283
Total $ 99,385,661 $ 27,119,898 $ 72,265,763
Agenda Item #12.7.
Maximum Justified Impact Fee Schedule
Land Use Public Safety
Civic
Facilities
Transportation
Facilities Parks
Storm
Drainage Water Wastewater
Total -
Maximum
Justified
Residential - per Sq. Ft, $ 1.30 $ 1.60 $ 0.81 $ 3.77 $ 0.61 $ 1.41 $ 1.57 $ 11.07 Nonresidential - Fee per Sq. Ft.
Commercial $ 1.30 $ 1.60 $ 5.10 $ - $ 1.90 $ 0.86 $ 1.87 $ 12.63 Office 2.00 2.46 4.06 - 1.58 0.86 1.87 12.83
Industrial
0.71 0.87 2.43 - 1.90 0.73 1.65 8.29
Hotel Room
1.37 1.69 5.46 - 2.64 2.40 5.50 19.07
Agenda Item #12.7.
Next Steps
▪Tonight: Hold public hearing to adopt revised fee
schedule
▪Affordable housing and commercial linkage fee nexus
study to be presented in December
Agenda Item #12.7.
Questions
Agenda Item #12.7.
Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: CONSENT ITEMS
Department: Planning
DATE: November 28, 2023
FROM: Andrew Bradley, Asst. to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of resolution directing City staff to propose future Zoning Code amendments to prohibit new fossil fuel (gas) service station uses and structures.
RECOMMENDED
ACTION:
Adopt a resolution directing City staff to process a future zoning code amendment prohibiting the establishment or
expansion of any new fossil fuel (gas) service stations.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
None
STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:
Consideration of a resolution directing City staff to
recommend a future zoning code amendment to prohibit
new gas/fuel station land uses in all zoning districts and to provide uniform and comprehensive regulations and
development standards for modifications, maintenance,
operation, and discontinuation of existing gas/fuel station uses and facilities in the City. Separately, City staff will also explore options for additional EV charging on City owned/maintained properties and look for ways to
encourage installation at privately owned facilities.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There are no direct fiscal impacts associated with this resolution. There are other potential indirect costs that cannot be quantified at this point.
BACKGROUND:
In the interest of reducing green house gas emissions, this item recommends that the City Council direct City of St. Helena staff prepare a proposed zoning code amendment to prohibit new gas station land uses in all zoning districts and to provide uniform and comprehensive regulations and development standards for modifications, maintenance, operation, and discontinuation of fueling station/gas station uses and facilities in the City. Concurrently with proceeding with the process of preparing the proposed zoning code amendment, City staff will also explore options for additional EV charging on City owned/maintained properties and look for ways to encourage installation at privately owned facilities for public benefit.
Staff’s inventory of gas stations/fueling stations within the City of St. Helena’s incorporated limits shows three (3) existing stations: St. Helena NVP (The Station) at 1153 Main Street, VCS St. Helena 76 at 1108 Main Street, and St. Helena Chevron at Agenda Item #12.8.
1400 Main Street. Based on this inventory, all stations are located within an 8-minute drive of every existing residence and business within the City incorporated limits.
DISCUSSION:
According to the Final Napa County Regional Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2019 (https://sodacanyonroad.org/docs/Napa_County_Regional_2019_Greenhouse_Gas_Inv entory_Summary.pdf) completed by Napa County and Ascent Environmental the onroad transportation sector is the largest source of emissions in St. Helena, generating nearly half of the total emissions in 2019. According to the inventory report St. Helena produced a total of 64,575 MTCO2/year in 2019, more than 30,600 MTCO2/year came from on-road transportation, while another 4,500 MTCO2/year came from off-road equipment and 4,400 MTCO2/year came from agriculture, including agricultural equipment. These three transportation related sectors created 61.2% of the greenhouse gas emissions in St. Helena. Based on the same report the City of St. Helena produced more greenhouse gasses than any city in Napa County at 10.6 MTCO2/year per capita and had the second highest transportation emissions per capita at 2.8 MTCO2/year.
The St. Helena General Plan Update 2040
(https://www.cityofsthelena.org/planning/page/2040-general-plan-update) includes policies that:
Reduce greenhouse gases (GHG);
Ensure a sustainable transportation network;
Aim to reduce the impacts of climate change;
Seeks to mitigate the public health and safety risks caused by air pollution and hazardous materials.
In March 2023 the City Council received the Safety Element Update: Climate Change Hazards and Vulnerability Assessment
(https://www.cityofsthelena.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning_resources/pa ge/25605/st.helena_climate_and_vulnerability_assessment_appendix_b_2023.pdf) report prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc that detailed specific climate hazards including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from a variety of sources. The Safety Element amendment was later adopted by the City Council in May 2023.
In addition to this, other actions, and recommendations, the St. Helena City Council adopted of a set of five goals in May 2023 that included Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, and Quality of Life (https://www.cityofsthelena.org/bccitycouncil/page/city-council-goals).
In addition, the current Zoning Code and the August 2023 Draft Zoning Code (https://www.cityofsthelena.org/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning_resources/pa ge/15571/redline_public_hearing_draft_zoning_code_aug_8-2023.pdf) seek to protect and promote the public health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of residents, while also encouraging orderly, compatible, and beneficial uses of land. The Code continues by stating that its purpose is to maintain and enhance the desirable character Agenda Item #12.8.
of the City and its various neighborhoods and areas. The City finds that there are more beneficial uses of land other than allowing for the establishment of new gas stations.
In furtherance of the City’s dedication to its goals of Infrastructure, Environmental Sustainability, and Quality of Life within the City of St. Helena, City staff has prepared the proposed attached resolution. The recommendation to proceed with the proposed amendment is supported by broad scientific consensus, the City’s General Plan commitments, and is in line with the actions of numerous other cities and towns in our region including: Calistoga, Yountville, American Canyon, Petaluma, Rohnert Park, Sebastopol, Cotati, Santa Rosa, Windsor, and the unincorporated areas of Sonoma County.
Staff worked with the City Attorney’s Office in preparing the proposed resolution. After thoroughly researching what other neighboring cities have enacted, such as the City of Calistoga, City of Petaluma, and the City of American Canyon, Staff prepared the attached draft resolution for consideration.
Staff anticipates that the proposed zoning code amendment will allow existing gas station uses could continue as non-conforming uses.
ADDITIONAL NOTES:
If one or two gas stations went out of business, staff further anticipates that the future zoning change would not prevent a new operator from coming in and operating them as a gas station as long as the new operator is not expanding the use and the use of the gas station has not been discontinued for a continuous period of 180-days or more.
Further, consistent with the nonconforming use provisions of the Zoning Code, the City anticipates that safety improvements, minor lighting improvements, and improvements to the convenience stores associated with the existing gas stations would be allowed as long as it is not an expansion or intensification of the use and the operator obtains any necessary permits and/or approvals. Concurrently with proceeding with the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code, City staff will also explore options for additional charging on City owned/maintained properties and look for ways to encourage installation at privately owned facilities for public benefit.
CONSISTENCY WITH COUNCIL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
This action would be broadly consistent with Council Goals 2 (Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability) and 5 (Quality of Life) by seeking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and encourage the use of ZEVs by making charging stations more available throughout the City.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This action will not have a significant effect on the environment in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed resolution is not a project Agenda Item #12.8.
subject to CEQA review in accordance with Section 15378. Further, section 15601 (b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines exempts these amendments from CEQA analysis because the City’s action in adopting the resolution provides no potential for resulting in physical change in the environment, directly or ultimately, and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:
St. Helena Draft Gas Station Ban Resolution-Recommendation md.ac2 Agenda Item #12.8.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. HELENA
RECOMMENDING THAT CITY STAFF INITIATE A ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO PROHIBIT NEW GAS STATION LAND USES IN THE CITY OF ST. HELENA WHEREAS, transportation remains the largest contributor to greenhouse gas and criteria pollutant emissions in California;
WHEREAS, to combat the increasing rate of greenhouse gas emissions and to improve environmental and human health, society must transition from internal combustion engines to Zero Emission Vehicles ("ZEV") as the predominant method of transportation; and
WHEREAS, an inventory of current and approved gas stations in the City shows they are adequate to serve existing and planned residential and commercial developments whose residents and/or employees may be dependent upon internal combustion engines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Helena adopted the St. Helena General Plan Update 2040 in 2019 that included a goal of reducing greenhouse gases and ensuring a sustainable transportation network; and
WHEREAS, the other California cities including those within Napa County and neighboring Sonoma County have sought to ban the construction and/or expansion of new fossil fuel/gas stations; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use Element and the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City's General Plan illustrate the City's commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 17.07.040 of the St. Helena Municipal Code, amendments to Title 17, Zoning, of the City's Municipal Code may be initiated by the City Council, a property owner or interested party; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to direct City staff to prepare a proposed amendment to the City's Zoning Code to prohibit new gas station uses, for future consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, The City will also explore options for additional charging stations on City owned/maintained properties and look for ways to encourage installation at privately owned facilities.
WHEREAS, the draft resolution and recommendation was released to the public for review on the City's website on November 28, 2023; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST.
HELENA AS FOLLOWS:
Agenda Item #12.8.
1. City staff is hereby directed to prepare and analyze a proposed amendment to the Zoning Code to prohibit new gas/fuel station land uses in all zoning districts in the City and to provide uniform and comprehensive regulations and development standards for modifications, maintenance, operation, and discontinuation of gas/fuel stations land uses and facilities in the City. The proposed amendment shall be presented to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation to Council, which will consider the proposed ordinance to amendment the City’s Zoning Code.
2. City Council’s action to prepare and analyze a proposed amendment to the Zoning Code is not a project within the meaning of CEQA Guidelines Section 15378, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change in the environment, because the only action taken by Council is to direct the City staff to begin the process of preparing a Zoning Code amendment. Moreover, such amendments are, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(b)(3), not subject to CEQA under the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.
Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on November 28, 2023, by the following vote:
Mayor Paul Dohring: ____
Vice Mayor Eric Hall: ____
Council Member Anna Chouteau: ____
Council Member Lester Hardy: ____
Council Member Billy Summers: ____
APPROVED: ATTEST:
______________________ _________________________
Paul Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk
Agenda Item #12.8.
Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: NEW BUSINESS
Department: Administration
DATE: November 28, 2023
FROM: Anil Comelo, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration and approval of a resolution declaring City parcels to be surplus (1480 Main Street and 1572 and
1574 Railroad Avenue)
RECOMMENDED
ACTION:
Staff recommends City Council approve a resolution
declaring parcels 1480 Main Street (A.P.N. 009-211-016), and 1572 and 1574 Railroad Avenue (A.P.N.009-193-002),
surplus land under the Surplus Land Act Gov. Code
Section 54220 et. seq.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
N/A
STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:
The purpose is to declare two parcels, 1480 Main Street and 1572 and 1574 Railroad Avenue surplus and to offer
the parcels for sale to HCD’s list of affordable housing developers and certain public entities as statutorily
required under the Surplus Land Act codified in Gov. Code Section 54220 et. seq.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact to initiating the SLA process.
However, the sale of the two parcels could generate
several million in one-time revenue and potentially
additional several million in on-going revenue. Given the complexity and unknown factors when negotiating under
the SLA process, the exact revenue picture is unknown at this time.
BACKGROUND:
Consistent with City Council Goal 1 - Financial Sustainability and Goal 2 - Infrastructure and Environmental Sustainability, the City Council has received several reports on financing and revenue options to address City infrastructure and staff deficiencies. On February 28, 2023, the City Council received a presentation from BakerTillythat provided financial projections and warned about the need to increase revenues and/or further adjust service levels. The presentation provided several ways of dealing with the financial situation including reducing expenditures, engaging more aggressively in shared services, and increasing various types of fees and taxes. The key conclusion was that if community expectations are to be met, simply addressing the fiscal gap by Agenda Item #15.1.
only reducing expenditures will not work in the long run and new revenue stream(s) would need to be considered.
As a follow-up to the February 28, 2023, City Council meeting, on May 23, 2023, a report was brought to Council that further discussed each of the revenue options and City Council directed to staff to further pursue the Real Property Transfer Tax and other revenue enhance options as needed.
In response to this direction, staff recommended several actions including:
Update of the Fee Schedule and Impact Fees;
Possible General Obligation Bond to address the need to improve roads, sidewalks, and provide for multiple evacuation routes [deferred] Possible Property Transfer Tax to address immediate monetary need to fund routine maintenance of parks and City facilities, and the provision of general City operations and services; and
Sale of assets including real property for possible development of affordable housing and/or other economic activities
Community expectations are not being met and there is a need for investment in roads, sidewalks, evacuation routes, environmental sustainability, quality of life, and overall staffing, etc. The financial outlook shows short-term stability within the current staffing and service model since expenditures are being kept low intentionally with lower compensation, vacancies, lack of investment in technology, maintenance of parks, and other City facilities. There are also significant long-term challenges to address including unfunded uncompetitive staffing levels, and deficient new revenue generation which contributes to challenges in the ability of the City to meet Council Goals and community expectations. For these reasons, the City Council has directed staff to explore options to generate revenue. The sale of certain City properties is one way in which the City can generate revenue.
The City is fortunate that many talented residents have donated countless hours studying how to stabilize the City’s finances and make better use of City assets.
Several of these studies include the sale of City assets as part of the strategy to generate immediate and/or ongoing revenue. Both the Infrastructure Financing Committee (Thank you Chair Tom McBroom, Vice Chair George David, Daniel Hale, Elaine Honig, Patrick Kenealy, Richard Walloch, and Philippa Ward) and the St. Helena Assets Planning Engagement (SHAPE) Committee (Thank you Chair Mark Smithers, Vice Chair Anna Chouteau, Doug Barr, Oliver Caldwell, Pat Dell, Jeff Feeney, Stan Knight, Tim Nieman, Joshua Parke, Susanne Salvestrin, and Glenn Smith) assumed the sale of certain City assets to generate revenue and direct the proceeds for a variety of important purposes. The recent Urban Land Institute (ULI) report also made several recommendations including use/sale of the City’s assets to revitalize the City.
The City has several properties that could be considered for sale. These include several parks and parcels with structures on them such as the Carnegie Building[MD1] .
Agenda Item #15.1.
The City wishes to pursue the potential sale of certain Properties; therefore, it must now comply with the Surplus Land Act (codified in Gov. Code Section 54220 et. seq.) (“SLA”)and has hired Kosmont Companies to assist in that process.
On October 9, 2019, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill (“AB”) 1486. AB 1486, which amended the SLA, effective January 1, 2020, changed the existing, long-standing definition of “surplus land”; providing that land no longer necessary for a local agency’s use shall be declared either “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land” before taking any action to sell or lease land. To that end, AB 1486 also added a new limitation providing that an “agency’s use” “shall not include commercial or industrial uses or activities, including nongovernmental retail, entertainment, or office development,” or “property disposed of for the sole purpose of investment or generation or revenue.” AB 1486 further prohibits the City from negotiation of any disposition of the Properties prior to compliance with the procedural requirements of the SLA.
On October 11, 2023, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 480 (“AB 480”) and Senate Bill 747 (“SB 747”) into law, which further clarify provisions of the Surplus Land Act. AB 480 and SB 747, which will become effective on January 1, 2024, generally provide some increased flexibility as it pertains to the lease of public agency land, expands the definition of exempt surplus land, and the methodology for assessment of penalties for non-compliance (e.g. fair market value or sales price, whichever is greater). The California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) is also in the process of updating its SLA guidelines, which are anticipated to be issued prior to the end of 2023, which would provide further clarity on the impact of the recent amendments to the SLA.
[MD1]Suggest delete since we are not entertaining this parcel as part of SLA process.
DISCUSSION:
As indicated above, the SLA, Government Code Section 54220 et seq., requires that public agencies first declare land "surplus land" or "exempt surplus land" before it can negotiate any disposition of the land, either for sale or for lease.
Pursuant to the SLA, City staff must send a written Notice of Availability (“NOA”) of Properties by electronic mail or by certified mail to the all of the entities identified in Government Code section 54222, which include local public entities and housing sponsors that have notified the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) of their interest in surplus land for the purpose of developing lowand moderate-income housing, to any regional park authority and the State Resources Agency for open-space purposes; and local school districts for the purpose of school facilities or use.
If one of the entities/agencies receiving the NOA desires to purchase or lease the Properties, it must notify the City of its interest to do so in writing within 60 days of the Agenda Item #15.1.
date of the NOA. The City is required to negotiate price and terms for the disposition with any entity(ies)/agency(ies) so responding for a period of 90 days. Finally, in the event no agreement is reached between the City and any interested entity(ies)/agency(ies) after a good faith negotiation period of 90 days, the land may be disposed of without further regard to the Surplus Land Act subsequent to a compliance letter from HCD (approximately 30 days).
Staff has determined that there is no further governmental use for two certain Properties and is recommending that the City Council declare the Properties as “surplus land” and complete the surplus property disposition process in accordance with the SLA. This SLA request is focused on real property located at 1480 Main Street (A.P.N. 009-211- 016), and 1572 and 1574 Railroad Avenue ( A.P.N. 009-193-002), (“Properties”). Please refer to Attachment 1 which summarizes the land use information of these parcels., including the 5-acre Adams Street parcel.
The recent appraisal amount of three of the City’s Properties is listed below:
Adams Street: $18.3 million
1480 Main Street, Old City Hall: $4.9 million
1572 and 1574 Railroad Ave: $3.1 million (rezoning is expected to increase the appraisal amount)
The above Properties were considered for a possible sale. While the appraised amount, and thus ability to generate revenue for the City, of the Adams Street property is significantly greater than that of the other two properties, the current availability of the two other properties was the primary reason for recommending that they be declared surplus. The past community opposition to the sale of the Adams Street property also factored into the staff recommendation not to consider SLA for Adams Street at this time.
1480 Main Street (Old City Hall)
Located on the corner of Pine Avenue and Main Street, the City vacated this former City Hall building in December 2019 due to smoke damage. The parcel currently includes the old City Hall, old Police Station, and Fire Station. The Fire Station operations will remain active on this site so the City is currently processing a Parcel Map to split the parcel separating the Fire Station on its own parcel so it will not be included in the SLA process (Attachment 2). Additionally, the City desires to explore the potential partial vacation of Pine Street to enlarge the functionality of the 1480 Main parcel. The street vacation process would add approximately 3 months to the timeline of completing the creation of this new legal lot. The City may proceed with designating this property as “surplus” without completing the Parcel Map/Street Vacation processbut the City plans to not issue the required NOA until the two parcels are legally separated and an undated appraisal is completed based on the reduced lot size. 1572 and 1574 Railroad Avenue
Agenda Item #15.1.
Located on the corner of Fulton Avenue and Railroad Avenue, there are three structures on this site. 1572 Railroad Avenue is the current location of the Parks and Recreation Department and the associated youth building adjacent to it. 1574 Railroad Avenue is a deteriorated modular building which was vacated in early 2023 when City Hall relocated to the current location at 1088 College Avenue. The City has the option of relocating the Parks and Recreation Department to another City facility, such as the Carnegie building which has offices upstairs. Another option would be to move the current Parks and Recreation building to Crane Park, and preserve the historic structure.
The general SLA process is described in attachment X:
The following is the general anticipated timeline for this process:
Date Milestone
11/28/2023 City Council declares parcels surplus
1/18/2024 City sends NOA to qualified affordable housing developers 3/18/2024 Deadline for purchase proposals
6/17/2024 90-day negotiation period complete (if responses received) 7/17/2024 HCD approval
The City’s economy is primarily based on agriculture and tourism. Both industries employ workers that largely commute from surrounding cities. In recent months, competition for employees from employers outside the region has caused vacancies.
The impact of the vacancies is that businesses have had to curtail hours and reduce services. The City’s economic vitality depends on the availability of affordable housing so that workers can live closer to their jobs. The sale of these two properties therefore presents an opportunity for the City to generate much needed revenue while creating affordable housing locally. Potential housing providers are therefore encouraged to propose projects that will maximize affordable housing.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Exempt.
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1-City Property Matrix
Attachment 2-1480 Main St. Split Exhibit - not official Attachment 3-SLA Steps
Attachment 4-SLA RESOLUTION ST HELENA 11-28-2023
Agenda Item #15.1.
City SLA Properties Matrix
Property Current
General
Plan
Current
Zoning
Current
Use
Lot
Size
Sell,
Lease or
Hold
Estimated
Valuation
Old City
Hall
1480
Main St
Central
Business
(CB)
Central
Business
(CB)
Vacantsmoke
damage
1.7 acres**
Sell $4.9 M
1572
and
1574
Railroad
Ave
Business
and
Professional
Office
(BPO)
Business
and
Professional
Office
(BPO)
1572
Railroad:
Parks and
Recreation
1574
Railroad:
Vacant
.93
acres
Sell $3.2 M*
Adams
Parcel
Central
Business
(CB)
Central
Business
(CB)
Library
site and
agriculture
5.6 acres
Hold $18.3 M
*Anticipate different land value when the property is rezoned. **Includes the Fire Station. City is in process of processing a parcel split so only the land associated with the old City Hall and Police Station are part of the SLA process.
Agenda Item #15.1.
Legend
[
Printed On: 9/2/2022
0 2.25 4.5 9
mi
Disclaimer: This map was prepared for informational
purposes only. No liability is assumed for the
accuracy of the data delineated hereon.
1480 Main Street
Produced by Napa County GIS
Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Napa, Sonoma County, California State Parks, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, Agenda Item #15.1.
The general SLA process is described in the following chart:
Step 1
• City declares property “surplus” or "exempt surplus" land • If exempt, then City pursues HCD concurrence by providing written findings and posting the required public notice for a 30 day period (pursuant to AB 480 and SB 747)
• If not exempt, then City prepares a Notice of Availability (NOA)
Step 2
• City sends NOA to HCD’s list of affordable housing developers & other required public entities (e.g., school districts and recreation districts)
• Parties have 60 days to express interest
Step 3
• If "Step 2" responses received, 90-day good faith negotiation period commences (e.g., 03/19-06/17); Note: City does not have to sell the property for less than fair market value
• If no responses received or negotiations at impasse (e.g., FMV), agency may negotiate with other non-affordable
housing developers
• Process will require HCD approval which can take up to 30 days for a Letter of Compliance
Step 4
• Post HCD Approval, City may dispose of surplus land to other parties
• Agency must still record 15% affordability covenant, which is triggered if residential development contains 10 or more units • Enforcement: If the local agency does not comply with SLA, HCD will impose a 30% of final sale price or fair market value of the land (whichever is greater) for first violation and 50% of final sale price or fair market value of the land (whichever is greater) for second violation.
Agenda Item #15.1.
CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
RESOLUTON OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. HELENA DECLARING CERTAIN CITY
OWNED PROPERTIES SURPLUS LAND PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA SURPLUS LAND ACT
RECITALS
1. The CITY OF ST. HELENA ("CITY") owns certain real properties that are the subject of this resolution which include 1480 Main Street, located on the southeast corner of Main Street and Pine Avenue; and 1572 and 1574 Railroad Avenue, located on the southeast corner of Railroad Avenue and Fulton Lane (the "Properties");
2. The City has utilized these parcels as government offices but has since relocated City Hall to 1088 College Avenue;
3. Based upon the underutilized condition of the Properties the City desires to encourage both new infill commercial and residential development in a location near the downtown which is pedestrian friendly;
4. The Surplus Land Act, Government Code sections 54220 et seq., applies when a local agency disposes of "surplus land," as that term is defined in Government Code section 54221;
5. On October 9, 2019, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill ("AB") 1486. AB 1486 significantly amended the Surplus Land Act effective January 1, 2020 (hereinafter the "Surplus Land Act"). These amendments included, among others, changing the previous, long standing definitions of "surplus land" and "exempt surplus land"; providing that property shall be declared either "surplus land" or "exempt surplus land" before a local agency may take any action to dispose of it; and adding a new limitation providing that an "agency's use" "shall not include commercial or industrial uses or activities, including nongovernmental retail, entertainment, or office development" or "property disposed of for the sole purpose of investment or generation or revenue";
6. In order to pursue new uses for the Properties, including the possible disposition through a sale or lease of the properties, the City must comply with the Surplus Land Act;
7. Pursuant to the Surplus Land Act, City staff will send a written notice of availability of the property by electronic mail or by certified mail to all of the entities identified in Government Code section 54222;
Agenda Item #15.1.
8. Subject to Government Code section 54227, if one of the entities/agencies desires to purchase or lease the property after having received notice, it must indicate its interest to do so in writing within 60 days of receiving the City’s notice, and the City and the entity/agency so responding to the notice may negotiate price and terms for the disposition of the Property; and
9. Pursuant to Government Code 54223, in the event no agreement is reached between the City and any interested entity/agency after a good faith negotiation period of 90 days, the Property may be disposed of without further regard to the Surplus Land Act.
RESOLUTION
The City Council of the City of St. Helena hereby resolves as follows:
City Council directs staff to:
1. For purposes of compliance with the Surplus Land Act, parcel numbers 009-211-016 and 009-193-002 in the City of St. Helena are hereby declared non-exempt surplus land and not currently necessary for use by the City.
2. The City Manager, or his designee, is directed to proceed with the notification and negotiation requirements of the Surplus Land Act to facilitate the possible disposition and reuse of the properties.
Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on November 28, 2023, by the following vote:
Mayor Dohring: _____
Vice Mayor Hall: _____
Councilmember Hardy: _____
Councilmember Summers: _____
Councilmember Chouteau: _____
APPROVED: ATTEST:
____________________ ________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #15.1.
City Council Meeting |November 28, 2023
City of St. Helena
Land Development Briefing – Surplus Land Act (SLA)
Agenda Item #15.1.
Agenda
▪Financial Needs / Revenues / Funding Sources
▪Surplus Land Act (SLA)
▪Potential Opportunity Sites
1. City Hall (1480 Main St.)
2. Railroad Ave. (1572 Railroad Ave.)
▪Discussion
Agenda Item #15.1.
Land Development Planning
• Need to consider land development wholistically
– private and public properties
• Long term 20 years
• Consider circulation, water, equity, & amenities
Agenda Item #15.1.
City’s Needs/Liabilities And Potential Funding
• Roads, bridges, & sidewalks need of $35M to $60M
• Buildings and Parks
• Operational gap of about $6.9 million per year
• Real Estate Transfer Tax ballot measure in Nov 2024
• Potential revenue from proposed/entitled hotels
• Sale of City assets including the two listed properties • Formation of Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) Agenda Item #15.1.
Policy & Perspective: Impact on Public Sector
5 State Policy Land Use Economic Development
State focused on housing
production
especially in high-demand job
centers and TOD
New focus on housing policy
enforcement
RHNA, Density Bonuses/HAA and
Surplus Land Act (SLA) pressure
communities to deliver homes
SLA targets public agency owned
property for affordable housing
Land use demands blending
retail centers w/ apartments;
office conversions to residential;
infill distribution for delivery
Flexible zoning needed
for new integration
Rethinking outdoor spaces
parks, green space, outdoor
commercial, pedestrian orientation,
entertainment, pop-up venues
Communities can’t just focus on
attracting large employers
make places with amenities,
experiences, and housing that
attracts workers
Attracting workers
and attractive housing is
as essential as job creation
Strategy Matters
leveraging own resources and
attracting state / local funds
Get ahead of the SLA by updating
your asset plans
Agenda Item #15.1.
What is the Reconfigured Economy?
6 The New Consumer / Investor / Policymaker Mindset.
Consumers driven by quality of
life, cost of living and housing,
amenities, essentials, and experiences
Want it all in a 15-Minute Community
Investors driven by new
technology, shifting demand,
supply chain anomalies, and
new live / work patterns
Seeking value from new demand drivers
City Hall driven by resident and
employer needs & new state policies
which seek to install housing
Tension: Comply with state priorities
vs. achieving community priorities in a
post covid digital world
(RHNA, Density Bonus, SLA)
Agenda Item #15.1.
Surplus Land Act
Agenda Item #15.1.
Surplus Land Act (SLA) Overview
Origin
In response to the massive Statewide housing shortage, the State Legislature passed dozens of housing bills including AB 1486 (Surplus Land Act) to address this crisis. Most recently, the Governor signed two new bills (AB 480 and SB 747) in October 2023, which make certain modifications to the SLA that take effect in January 2024.
Purpose
The SLA gives affordable housing developers a right of first refusal on all public agency owned land in the State of California. Does not necessarily prevent agencies from ultimately selling or leasing property for other uses or fair market value.
Mandate
Public Agencies in California (e.g., cities, counties, special districts, school districts), with certain exceptions, must follow this mandate prior to selling or leasing public agency owned real estate.
Process
The SLA requires an up to 180-day request for proposal/bid process to either select or reject an affordable housing project/proposals. Once rejected, the property can be sold or leased to broader market.
8 Agenda Item #15.1.
SLA: Steps for Disposition Process
9 Step 1
• City declares property “surplus” or "exempt surplus" land • If exempt, then City pursues HCD concurrence by providing written findings • If not exempt, then City prepares Notice of Availability (NOA) Step 2
• City sends NOA to qualified affordable housing developers & other required public entities (e.g., school districts and recreation districts)
• Parties have 60 days to express interest (e.g., 9/23-11/23) Step 3
• If "Step 2" responses received, 90-day good faith negotiation period commences (e.g., 11/23-1/24); Note: City does not have to sell the property for less than fair market value • If no responses received or negotiations at impasse (e.g., FMV), agency may negotiate with other nonaffordable housing developers • Process will require HCD approval which can take up to 30 days for a Letter of Compliance (e.g., 2/24) Step 4
• Post HCD Approval, City may dispose of surplus land to other parties • Agency must still record 15% affordability covenant, which is triggered if residential development contains 10 or more units
• Enforcement: If the local agency does not comply with SLA, HCD will impose a 30% of final sale price for first violation and 50% of final sale price for second violation Agenda Item #15.1.
SLA Enforcement
If the local agency does not comply with SLA, HCD will impose a penalty of 30% of the final sale price or appraised value (whichever is greater) for the first violation. The penalty increases to 50% for a second violation.
Agenda Item #15.1.
Anticipated SLA Timeline
Deadline Action/Activity
28-Nov-23City Council declares parcels Surplus
2-Jan-24 City sends notice to affordable housing developers 4-Mar-24 Deadline for purchase proposals
3-Jun-24 90-day negotiation period if responses received 5-Jul-24 CA State HCD approval
Agenda Item #15.1.
Potential Opportunity Sites
Agenda Item #15.1.
Map of
Key Sites
13 Private Sector and City
owned parcels potentially
suited for redevelopment
Source: City of St. Helena
Agenda Item #15.1.
Potential Housing Production
Housing Site Units
Hunter Development 87
Pope Street 90
Mills Ln 50
Railroad 20
Total 247
HCD/ABAG - RNHA goal 254
Net (7.00)
Agenda Item #15.1.
Map of
1480
Main St.
and
nearby
City assets
15 1001 Adams St.
(Castellucci Property,
B of A site)
Lyman Park
(City-owned)
1572 Railroad Ave.
(City-owned)
Adams St. Site
(City-owned)
1480 Main St.
St. Helena
Fire Station
Source: NiteOwl Pro
Notes: It is envisioned the shaded red area will be available for future redevelopment. The fire station that will remain on the property is identified by the area bounded by the dashed red line.
Agenda Item #15.1.
Appraised Value of Properties
• Adams Street: $18.3 million
• City Hall: $4.9 million
• Railroad Ave: $3.1 million (needs update)
Agenda Item #15.1.
Staff Recommendations
Declare City Hall and Railroad sites to be Surplus Land and initiate SLA process.
Agenda Item #15.1.
Questions?
Agenda Item #15.1.
Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: NEW BUSINESS
Department: Administration
DATE: November 28, 2023
FROM: Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Consideration and proposed approval of a resolution appointing applicants to the Ad Hoc Water/Wastewater
Exploratory Committee
RECOMMENDED
ACTION:
Appoint three applicants.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
On October 24, 2023, the City Council adopted a
resolution establishing the Ad Hoc Water/Wastewater
Exploratory Committee and directed staff to conduct a
recruitment.
STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:
To appoint community members to the Ad Hoc
Water/Wastewater Exploratory Committee.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Over the last year, several residents have recommended the institution of a permanent Water and Wastewater Commission. On September 24, 2024, a recommendation was brought before the City Council to establish a Water and Wastewater Enterprises Exploratory Committee (WWE Committee) comprised of the Mayor, Councilmember Hardy and three residents for the purpose of identifying the issues for which qualified volunteers can best support the Water and Wastewater enterprises and to make recommendations to the Council as how to best organize an advisory body for this purpose. At this meeting it was determined that this will be a Brown Act Committee and City Council supported the recommendation.
On October 24, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution establishing the Ad Hoc Water/Wastewater Exploratory Committee and directed staff to conduct a recruitment.
DISCUSSION:
The recruitment seeking applicants from the community to apply for the Ad Hoc Water/Wastewater Exploratory Committee concluded on November 17, 2023. The City Clerk received a total of six applications.
Per City Council Rules of Procedure appointments shall be made by interview and the Mayor shall nominate applicants with the appointments subject to approval by the majority of Council. The City Council convened an applicant interview meeting on November 17, 2023 at 5:00 pm.
Agenda Item #15.2.
Applications received by:
1. Arlene Corsetti
2. Chris Warner
3. Garry Rose
4. Gary Matack
5. Gene Armstead
6. Jim Smith
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittee Purpose Statement Attachment 2 - Appointments Resolution
Agenda Item #15.2.
St. Helena City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Dated 10-12-23
WATER AND WASTEWATER EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE (WWE COMMITTEE) Purpose. The Water and Wastewater Enterprises Exploratory Committee (WWE Committee) will identify issues for which qualified volunteers can best support the Water and Wastewater Enterprises.
Background. Community members have expressed interest in a permanent Water and Wastewater Commission to the City Council.
On September 24, 2023, a recommendation was brought before the City Council to establish a WWE Committee which will be comprised of the Mayor, Councilmember Hardy, and residents for the purpose stated above.
Schedule/Meetings. The first Subcommittee meeting is anticipated to take place in December 2023. Subsequent meetings will be determined at the first meeting, likely 1 – 2 times per month.
Community Participation. The City will seek community applicants in accordance with the City Council Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Council Meetings.
Applications will be accepted through November 17, 2023. Applicants will be invited to interview at a Special Meeting to be held on November 28, 2023, and applicants will be appointed at the regularly scheduled meeting that same evening.
Subcommittee Composition. Minimum of five with a maximum of seven members (including the Mayor and Councilmember) with the Mayor serving as the Chair and Councilmember Hardy serving as Vice-Chair.
Objectives: Recommendation to City Council on how to best organize an advisory body for this purpose no later than June 30, 2024.
Timeline: It is anticipated that this exploratory subcommittee will operate for approximately 6 months and will conclude no later than June 30, 2024.
City Council: Mayor Dohring and Councilmember Hardy.
Staff: Assistant City Manager, April Mitts.
Agenda Item #15.2.
CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
Appointing applicants to the Ad Hoc Water/Wastewater Exploratory Committee
RECITALS
A. On September 24, 2024, a recommendation was brought before the City Council to establish a Water and Wastewater Enterprises Exploratory Committee (WWE Committee); and
B. The committee will be comprised of the Mayor, Councilmember Hardy and three residents; and
C. The purpose of the committee is to of identify the issues for which qualified volunteers can best support the Water and Wastewater enterprises. The committee will be a Brown Act Committee; and
D. On October 24, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution establishing the Ad Hoc Water/Wastewater Exploratory Committee and directed staff to conduct a recruitment which concluded on November 17, 2023 at 5:00 p.m.; and E. The first Subcommittee meeting is anticipated to take place in December 2023.
Subsequent meetings will be determined at the first meeting, likely 1 – 2 times per month; and
F. It is anticipated that this exploratory subcommittee will operate for approximately 6 months and will conclude no later than June 30, 2024.
RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of St. Helena resolves as follows:
1. Ad Hoc Water/Wastewater Exploratory Committee
Mayor Dohring, Council Member Hardy, __________, __________, and __________, are appointed to the Ad Hoc Water/Wastewater Exploratory Committee; and
Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on November 28, 2023, by the following vote:
Mayor Dohring: __________
Vice Mayor Hall : __________
Council Member Chouteau: __________
Council Member Summers: __________
Council Member Hardy: __________
APPROVED: ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #15.2.
Agenda Report to the City Council
Agenda Section: NEW BUSINESS
Department: Public Works
DATE: November 28, 2023
FROM: Mario Traverso, Public Works Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration and Adoption of a Resolution accepting the Pavement Technical Assistance Program (P-TAP) Final
Report and provide comments and direction on the
proposed 5-year Pavement Restoration Project List.
RECOMMENDED
ACTION:
Adopt Resolution and provide direction on the 5-year
project list approach.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
None
STATEMENT OF THE
PURPOSE:
Consideration and proposed adoption of a resolution
accepting the P-TAP Final Report and provide comments
and direction on the proposed 5-year list of pavement
restoration projects.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND:
The City of St. Helena owns and maintains approximately 26 miles of roadway within the City. This roadway network is composed of approximately one mile of arterial streets, 11 miles of collector streets, and 14 miles of residential streets; with an estimated replacement value over $37 million dollars.
The City's Pavement Management Program (PMP) includes the annual Pavement Restoration Capital Improvement Project which addresses the restoration and maintenance needs for the roadway network according to the City Council approved 5- Year project list which is developed or updated on a biennial basis.
The City's recent Pavement Restoration Capital Improvement Projects include the following:
2016 Charter Oak Avenue, Brown Street, Allison Avenue Area 2018 Monte Vista, Grove Court, Hunt Avenue, El Bonita Avenue, La Quinta Avenue
2019 Crinella Drive, Park Street, Spring Street west of Sylvaner Avenue, Money Way
2022 College Avenue, Voorhees Circle, Sections of Railroad Avenue, Pratt Avenue, Stockton Street, Pope Street
2023 (current) Grayson Avenue, Pope Street Bridge, Silverado Trail
Agenda Item #15.3.
One component of the City's Pavement Management Program (PMP) is the City's participation in a regional program called the Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program, also known as P-TAP. This program provides a biennial assessment and Final Report of all of the City's roadway assets. Additionally, the roadway assets including the results of the biennial assessments are catalogued in an electronic asset management program called StreetSaver. Streetsaver is specifically designed for pavement management and is a useful tool to aid in the development of pavement management plans, project scoping and budgeting.
The City recently participated in Cycle 24 of the P-TAP program. The roadway assessments occurred in August 2023, and a Final Report (Attachment 5) was published in September 2023. Highlights from this report indicate an increase in the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the roadway network from 47/100 to 53/100, this has moved the City into the low end of the "good" range of the overall condition scale.
The Final Report provides a comprehensive evaluation of the City's roadway network and provides guidance on management strategies which considers the existing conditions, budgets and targeted results. Specifically, the StreetSaver program is used to develop a variety of budget and target driven scenarios to produce a series of work plans that are used to identify and plan cost effective strategies to maintain and improve the street network, various work plan scenarios are found in the appendix of the Final Report.
The Final Report contains five scenarios and associated work plans as indicated in Table 1.
The following table presents the results for five alternate scenarios:
Report Scenario PCI
(2029)
Annual
Funding
Level
Five Year
Funding
Total
Deferred
Maintenance
Existing 53 - - $21 million
No Allocated Funds 44 $0 $0 $25 million
Funding to Maintain PCI of
53 53 $750,000 $3.8 million $17 million
Increase PCI by 5 Points 58 $1.05 million $5.3 million $16 million Annual Budget of $1.2 m 62 $1.2 million $6 million $12.8 million Increase PCI to 78 (ideal) 78 $3.1 million $15.5 million $5.4 million Important takeaways from the above scenarios include a 25% overall average increase of projected costs as compared to 2021. Additionally, the City is well positioned to make significant progress toward higher PCI ratings and the estimated Budget Needs.
Agenda Item #15.3.
Staff is requesting City Council to review and formally accept the P-TAP Final Report (Attachment 5) by Resolution (Attachment 1).
The information obtained from the P-TAP final report and the StreetSaver program are two components that lend to the overall strategy used to develop a comprehensive and effective pavement management program. Other strategic components include considerations for underground utility needs, budget priorities, community and Council priorities, and geographic equity.
Together, these considerations shape the City's Pavement Management Plan which culminates with the development of a 5-Year project list. The 5-year project list is updated on a biennial basis, instep with both the P-TAP cycle and the Measure T project adoption cycle. The current 5-year list was approved by Council in December 2021, and has served as the basis for the City's recent pavement projects. The current pavement project (FY2023-24) represents Year 2 of this 5-Year list.
The City's updated 5-Year project list is due to the Napa Valley Transportation Authority for approval by December 30, 2023. The 5-Year list will be scheduled to be updated again in 2025 following both the P-TAP and Measure T cycles.
DISCUSSION:
The P-TAP Final Report provides a variety of project scenarios including a 5-Year project list in Appendix II, Section E. The 5-Year project list represents a scenario generated from StreetSaver, which considers the existing pavement conditions and budgets. The list includes streets that would receive new pavement overlay and streets that would receive a microsurface or slurry seal maintenance treatment within the fiveyear cycle. This list is an algorithmic generation and serves as a strategic baseline for the development of a comprehensive 5-Year plan.
Multiple other factors must be considered of which StreetSaver does not account for in its scenario computations. The StreetSaver generated 5-Year plan is amended and modified to account for other important factors. Generally, these factors include the following:
Utility Considerations - A comprehensive 5-Year project list should represent surface restorations in association with scheduled underground utility projects, known underground utility needs and impending development projects. Currently, scheduled underground utility projects include the Oak Avenue Rehabilitation Project in 2025 and the Kearney and Andrea Watermain Replacement project in 2024. Complete surface restoration will be included in both of these projects. Additionally, it is known that significant portions of the underground utilities within the City are in need of some degree of rehabilitation, but currently the specific project scope of these needs is not determined. The sewer infrastructure project scopes will be determined upon the completion and analysis of the current sewer inspection project. The schedule for rehabilitation of street segments in 5-Year project list which are determined to require Agenda Item #15.3.
sewer utility rehabilitation will need to be adjusted accordingly. The City's water and stormwater infrastructure needs are identified in the Integrated Utility Master Plan (IUMP) but current projects generally do not require full roadway excavations.
Budget Considerations - The pavement restoration projects in the City are primarily funded through tax measures including Measure T, the county wide 1/2 cent sales tax, Senate Bill 1 (SB1) and the Highway Users Tax (HUTA). Together, these sources provide approximately $2.1 million annually to support a variety of transportation related improvement projects in the City. Revenues have steadily increased, with current Measure T revenue projected at $1.7 million, and a projected 2% annual increase. The increase in projected funding provides significant flexibility to modify project scopes beyond the average pavement restoration project budget of $1.2 million. $1.2 million has historically provided 1 mile of pavement restoration and maintenance. Additionally, a Measure T fund balance currently exists of approximately $3.6 million resulting from an accumulation from 2020 and 2021 during which no pavement restoration projects occurred. This balance could be leveraged to further increase project scopes. These tax revenues may be applied to support a variety of transportation related improvement projects, including the Downtown Sidewalk Replacement Project Phase II, of which a portion of the fund balance is expected to support.
Geographic Equity - There is significant consideration for planning and scheduling improvements proportionally throughout the City. Conversely, the needs of the City are not exactly proportional and generally significant cost savings are realized when construction activities are strategically localized. StreetSaver is useful in that it can generate an unbiased 5-Year project list, but it's algorithmic analysis can produce a baseline 5-Year project list with elements that appear disjointed. Efforts are made to refine the project scopes by either extending road sections, grouping road segments, or advancing or deferring road segments. This exercise helps define balanced project scopes both locally and across the entire City.
Community and Council Priorities - Specific needs throughout the City are widely known and regularly voiced throughout the community. Some of these priorities include Oak Avenue, Grayson Avenue, Crane Avenue, Sulphur Springs Avenue, Pratt Avenue, McCorkle Avenue, Hunt Avenue, Church Street, Edwards Street and the "bump" on Adams Street between Main Street and Railroad Avenue. Currently, many of these priority locations are experiencing some level of planning or design. Recently, Council awarded the contract to Summit Engineering to complete the 2007 design effort for the rehabilitation of Oak Avenue, which includes sewer, water, stormwater, sidewalk and pavement improvements. The improvements are anticipated to commence in Summer 2024. The current pavement restoration project includes Grayson Avenue with construction scheduled to commence in the Fall 2023/Winter 2024. The design for the rehabilitation of Crane Avenue is complete (2020), but the IUMP (2021) recommends certain drainage infrastructure improvements that are currently being incorporated into the original design plans. Funding for Crane Avenue also needs to be obligated provided its extensive scope. Plans for the restoration for the entirety of Sulphur Springs and Pratt Avenue, are included in the proposed 5-Year plan. Significant Agenda Item #15.3.
drainage issues have been identified on McCorkle Avenue which will need to be addressed in addition to pavement restoration, the funding source of which is not determined. Lastly, the utility infrastructure of Church Street and Edwards Street may need to be replaced in addition to pavement restoration provided its age and pending results of the sewer inspection project.
Generating a 5-Year project list is an iterative process which attempts to synthesize the above-mentioned factors and considerations. The iterative process used to produce the proposed 5-Year lists is as follows;
1. The 2024 P-TAP 5-Year project scenario is used as an un-biased, strategic 5-Year project "baseline."
2. The uncompleted project years of the 2021 5-Year list (current), including Year 3, Year 4 and Year 5, are overlaid to the 2024 P-TAP 5 Year project list in efforts to maintain continuity.
3. Planned and anticipated CIP projects and development projects which include utilities and pavement restoration are overlaid.
4. Specific street segments are organized and modified to promote a balance of strategic localization and geographic equity.
5. The plan is reviewed, ensuring that the project scopes and budgets are feasible, and treatments are appropriate. Adjustments and updates are made, the Streetsaver scenario is re-ran, and the process begins again.
The proposed 5-year lists maintain general conformance with the 2024 P-TAP 5-Year project list and the project scopes from the uncompleted 2021 5-Year list, while accounting for budget, planned projects, localization and geographic equity.
Additionally, Attachments 2, 3 and 4 highlight variations to the strategic delivery of the 5-Year plan.
Attachment 2, labeled East / West, highlights a delivery strategy with an emphasis on localizing the annual scopes of pavement projects to alternating sides of town. Projects would be localized, while maintaining geographic equity across the five-year project cycle. This approach can be advantageous in that (1) significant improvements are expedited to a local vicinity, (2) disruptions due construction activities are generally contained to a smaller vicinity, (3) there is a potential for cost savings due to efficiencies from concentrated construction efforts. A drawback to this approach is that areas of the City may experience more significant delay in area improvements.
Attachment 3, labeled Alternate Treatment Types, illustrates a delivery strategy which schedules the specific pavement treatments of new a pavement overlay and a microsurface maintenance treatment on an alternating annual cycle. This approach can Agenda Item #15.3.
be advantageous in that certain efficiencies and cost savings are realized when construction contracts are executed to include only one specific construction method.
Additionally, "major" construction activities and disruptions would only be experienced biennially. A drawback to this approach is that paving only occurs in three of the five years and the resulting project scopes may become cumbersome.
Attachment 4 highlights a combined delivery strategy. In this approach, the project scopes are localized east and west on an annual schedule, with the consideration of treatment types. This approach is preferable in that the project scopes are robust yet manageable.
Staff is requesting Council and the community to provide comments or direction on the overall list of selected streets and provide comments or direction of the overall delivery strategy. Comments and direction will be incorporated into the proposed 5-Year list. An updated list will be brought to City Council for approval on December 12, 2023.
Once approved, the 5-Year list will serve as the road map to define upcoming pavement restoration projects beginning in FY2024/25. Staff is aware of the delays in the delivery of the recent Pavement Restoration projects, which have occurred in the middle of the fiscal year. Once approved, Staff will initiate the project design in preparation for bidding in late winter in expectation of construction beginning at the start of the fiscal year, July 1, 2024.
If the proposed 5-Year project list is delivered as shown, the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for the City is projected exceed 70. This would be a significant improvement from the current PCI of 53. This, in addition to the anticipated increase in revenues, positions the City to make significant progress on addressing the longstanding pavement needs.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: None
DOCUMENTS ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 - Resolution - Final Report Acceptance
Attachment 2 - Proposed 5 Year List Exhibit, East / West Attachment 3 - Proposed 5 Year List Exhibit, Alternate Treatment Types Attachment 4 - Proposed 5 Year List Exhibit, Combined
Attachment 5 - PTAP-24 St Helena Final Report
Agenda Item #15.3.
CITY OF ST. HELENA
RESOLUTION NO.
Consideration and proposed adoption of a resolution
accepting the Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP) Final Report.
RECITALS
A. The City of St. Helena is a member agency of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC); and
B. MTC provides planning, funding, coordination and technical assistance to cities, counties and transit agencies; and
C. MTC administers the Pavement Technical Assistance Program (P-TAP) which assists cities, counties and transit agencies with pavement asset assessments, program management; and
D. The City of St. Helena participated in the 24th round of the P-TAP program; and
E. The Final Report has been completed and delivered to the City.
RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of St. Helena resolves as follows:
1. Accepting the Final Report as resulting from the City’s participation the 24th round of the Pavement Technical Assistance Program; and
2. Directing staff to file the Final Report.
Approved at a Regular Meeting of the St. Helena City Council on November 28, 2023, by the following vote:
Mayor Paul Dohring: _____
Vice Mayor Eric Hall: _____
Council Member Anna Chouteau: _____
Agenda Item #15.3.
Council Member Lester Hardy: _____
Council Member Billy Summers: _____
APPROVED: ATTEST:
______________________ ________________________
Paul Jamison Dohring, Mayor Cindy Tzafopoulos, City Clerk Agenda Item #15.3.
C.u lmal ‘,
|n3muI-
.>'«rrEn:.x
9 ‘E101re I<1111-:
Q0W2 xv":: ||'=’/110H
East / West
5-Year Street List
T E/WYear 1 Overlay
T E/WYear 1 Slurry
T E/WYear 3 Overlay
E/WYear 2 Slurry
T E/WYear 2 Overlay
E/WYear 3 Slurry
T E/WYear 4 Overlay
T E/WYear 5 Overlay
E/WYear 5 Slurry fa‘
T E/WYear 4 Slurry 5*
n“
gain! Heb:-na ;—" Pnma r: V Cranu: Furl. ,\‘
oma County, l§1~j‘\r\eau of Lnd Management, Esri, HERE,Garmin, INCREMENTP, ,%\ \‘v-E ‘ ‘~ NGA, uses
"Agenda Item #15.3.
‘//I
r:un.m
\u;I\lm .4 mm
'4,
"M « r,
am,/Ly)
«N54,,
n—,rw,.,
Treatment
Types
5-Year Street . .. ~ _~
List *
1 Year 1 Overlay ‘ ‘ '
Thomzm
1 Year 2 Microsurface 3
1 Year 3 Overlay _,»‘°
1 Year 4 Microsurface (g“‘\
0 v 5 o I
“O “Y j ea‘ ;¢‘ _\ ‘’e' 3V , County orNapa, 5 reau of Land Management. Esn, HERE,Garmm.WNCREMENTP, 5
NGA, USGS
Agenda Item #15.3.
C.u|m:n,
|n:.mLn of
.»'«n):-rt.‘
'/ 0, rm,“ my
Eiwn»;-Iu1'H'~
I M
H, 1» H n
:-I H-:L<m r.‘r,~/ Ugln» Ivll
‘Q
\’\"
Proposed
5-Year Street List
j Year 1 Overlay
1 Year 2 Overlay
1 Year 3 Overlay
T Year 4 Overlay
1 Year 5 Overlay
1 Year 1 Microfurface
Fhmarw V
Oran»: Hut .0
Year 2 Microsurface
T Year 3 Microsurface
1 Year 4 Microsurface 9‘
Year 5 Microsurface xp‘
\. oma County, l§u“\r\eau of Land Management, Esri, HERE,Garmin, INCREMENTP, ,M‘\< v-‘Z ‘ NGA, uses
"Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24
City of St. Helena
Final Report
2023-24
Pavement Management
Program Update
September 21, 2023
Prepared by:
Agenda Item #15.3.
The preparation of this report has been financed in part by grants from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Agenda Item #15.3.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables & Figures
Acronyms & Abbreviations
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Network Description .............................................................................................................................. 2 Existing Pavement Condition ................................................................................................................ 4 Pavement Management Strategy ............................................................................................................ 6 Budget Needs ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Budget Analysis/Scenarios .................................................................................................................... 9 No Funds ($0) .......................................................................................................................... 11 Maintain PCI of 53 ($750 thousand) ............................................................................................. 12 Five Point Increase in PCI ($1.05 million) .................................................................................... 13 Expected Annual Budget ($1.2 million) ........................................................................................ 14 Budget Needs Average ($3.1 million) ........................................................................................... 15 Program Budget Options and PMP Suggestions .................................................................................. 17 Limits of Study ........................................................................................................................ 19 Maintenance Strategy Development ........................................................................................ 20 Annual Budget Projections ...................................................................................................... 20 Maintenance Strategy Assignments ........................................................................................ 20 Maintenance Decisions ............................................................................................................ 21 Pavement Management Program Reports ............................................................................... 21 System Maintenance ................................................................................................................ 22 Appendix I – Pavement Condition Index & Remaining Service Life Section PCI/RSL Listing Report
Appendix II - Budget Analysis Report
A. Budget Needs Report and Treatment Cost Details– Five Years B. Average PCI by Annual Funding Chart
C. Deferred Maintenance Cost Trend by Annual Funding Chart D. Budget Scenario Cost and Network Condition Summaries E. Annual Work Program - $1.2 million
Appendix III - Backup Data
A. Section Description Inventory Report
B. Inventory of Applied Maintenance
C. Maintenance Treatment Decision Trees
Appendix IV – Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Quality Management Report (QMR)
Agenda Item #15.3.
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1 Pavement Mileage by Functional Class .................................................................................... 2 Table 2 Network Replacement Value .................................................................................................... 3 Table 3 PCI Breakdown Descriptions .................................................................................................... 4 Table 4 PCI by Functional Class............................................................................................................ 4 Table 5 Percentage of Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category ............................. 5 Table 6 Agency’s Maintenance Treatments by Condition Category ..................................................... 8 Table 7 Budget Needs Analysis ............................................................................................................. 9
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Percentage of Network by Functional Class ............................................................................ 3 Figure 2 Centerline Miles of Street by Condition .................................................................................. 5 Figure 3 Alligator Cracking Deduct Curve ............................................................................................ 6 Figure 4 Pavement Management – Applying Cost Effective Treatment ............................................... 7 Figure 5 PCI Chart ............................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 6 Deferred Maintenance Chart ................................................................................................. 17 Figure 7 PCI and Deferred Maintenance Chart ................................................................................... 18 Agenda Item #15.3.
ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS
AC: Asphalt Concrete
CIP: Capital Improvement Plan
DBE: Disadvantage Business Enterprise
DM: Deferred Maintenance
FC: Functional Classification
GASB: Governmental Accounting Standards Board
GIS: Geographic Information System
MTC: Metropolitan Transmission Commission
OL: Overlay
PCC: Portland Cement Concrete
PCI: Pavement Condition Index
PM: Preventative Maintenance
PMP: Pavement Management Program
PTAP: Pavement Technical Assistance Program
ST: Surface Type
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
From May to June of 2023, Harris & Associates updated the Pavement Management Program (PMP) for the City of St. Helena under a contract with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) of the San Francisco Bay Area for their Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP), Round 24. For this update, a total of 26 centerline miles were surveyed. The City also provided a list of recently completed projects that comprised of microsurfacing as well as 2” Grind, 3” Overlay, and Fabric. This information was updated in the database (approximately 2 centerline miles and 13 sections). The PMP provides a management tool to inventory street pavement, assess pavement condition, record historical maintenance, forecast budget needs, and view impacts of funding on Citywide pavement condition over time.
The PMP is also a software-based tool for analyzing pavement conditions and recommending rehabilitation strategies based on funding levels. The software focuses on providing cost effective recommendations that enhance the overall system Pavement Condition Index (PCI)*. In general, asphalt concrete pavement deteriorates over time by both traffic loading and weathering. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) software recommends that 2% of the budget to be put towards preventive maintenance treatments† such as surface seals or crack seals. The remaining budget is allocated to more expensive asphalt concrete overlays and reconstructions.
Preventive maintenance treatments are important because they can sustain a street’s PCI at a high level at a relatively low cost. Preventive maintenance treatments can be applied to many streets (large pavement area) for a fraction of the cost to overlaying a single asphalt street (small pavement area).
The City currently uses MTC’s Pavement Management System StreetSaver® online version. The City uses the software to help make cost-effective decisions related to the street network, maximizing the City’s return on investment from available maintenance and rehabilitation funds; generating a prioritized plan and identifying specific areas in need of maintenance and rehabilitation.
For the City of St. Helena, the following five annual budget scenarios were generated with 2% of the annual budget applied towards preventative maintenance.
1. No Funds ($0)
2. Maintain PCI of 53 ($750 thousand)
3. Five Point Increase in PCI ($1.05 million)
4. Expected Annual Budget ($1.2 million)
5. Budget Needs Average ($3.1 million)
◊ “Pavement Condition Index Distress Identification Manual For Flexible Pavements” dated June 2016 and “Pavement Condition Index Distress Identification Manual For Rigid Pavements” dated March 2018 * Calculated by an algorithm developed by the Army Corps of Engineers. † Preventive maintenance is a schedule of planned maintenance actions aimed at the prevention of failure of streets. These actions are designed to detect, preclude, or mitigate degradation of a streets segment. The goal of a preventive maintenance approach is to minimize degradation and thus sustain or extend the useful life of the street.
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 2
PURPOSE
The Pavement Management Program assists the City by providing current distress survey data used to evaluate current pavement conditions. This helps to maintain an agency-defined desirable level of pavement performance while optimizing the expenditure of limited fiscal resources. A PMP system is also required to be eligible to apply and obtain federal funds.
Specifically, the program provides administrators and maintenance personnel with:
A current inventory of all public roadways
The current pavement condition for all public roadways A project list of all pavement segments in need of maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement
The most cost effective level of maintenance or repair appropriate at the time of the survey
A forecast of budget needs for maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement of deficient pavement sections for a selected time period, at various alternative overall condition levels
NETWORK DESCRIPTION
The City of St. Helena’s pavement network is comprised of approximately 26 centerline miles and is divided into 223 pavement management segments. To assist in planning maintenance needs, the City's streets were grouped according to functional class. Table 1 (below) shows the City’s pavement mileage by functional class.
Table 1
Arterial 11 1.13 2.25 215,968 4%
Collector 82 10.71 21.25 1,705,334 41%
Residential/Local 130 14.14 27.66 2,204,855 54%
Totals 223 25.98 51.16 4,126,157 100%
Pavement Mileage by Functional Class
Classification Total
Sections
Total Center
Line Miles
Total Lane
Miles
Percentage of
Street Network
Total Area
(sq. ft.)
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 3
Figure 1 (below) displays the percentage of each functional class in the overall network.
Figure 1
The City’s pavement network has a current reconstruction value of over $37 million. The current network reconstruction value (consisting of moderate base failure repair, removal of existing surface, and pavement overlay) by functional class is displayed in Table 2 (below):
Table 2
Functional
Class
Surface
Type
Lane
Miles
Unit Cost/
Square Foot
Pavement Area
(in SF)
Cost to
Replace
AC 0.2 $16.67 10,500 $174,999
AC/AC 2.1 $16.67 205,468 $3,424,453
AC 1.2 $13.89 88,245 $1,225,617
AC/AC 19.8 $13.89 1,593,939 $22,137,900
AC/PCC 0.3 $13.89 21,350 $296,526
PCC 0.0 $13.89 1,800 $25,000
AC 4.7 $4.79 386,295 $1,848,615
AC/AC 21.8 $4.79 1,721,944 $8,240,363
AC/PCC 1.1 $4.79 96,616 $462,356
Grand Total 51.2 $37,835,829 4,126,157
Network Reconstruction Value
Residential/Local
Arterial
Collector
Table 2 (above) provides network replacement costs sorted by Functional Class and Surface Type.
For each combination of Functional Class and Surface Type, the number of Lane Miles, Unit Cost (sq.ft.), Pavement Area (sq.ft.), and the cost to replace (in thousands) is reported. The replacement cost is based on the Category V ("Very Poor") treatment cost provided in the Decision Tree for each functional class and surface type combination. Grand totals are provided at the bottom of applicable columns.
It is important to consider the overall investment the City has in its pavements. The unit cost to repair a street segment in very poor condition (consisting of moderate base failure repair, removal of existing surface, and pavement overlay to reconstruction) is from $4.79-$16.67 per square foot Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 4
or $95.63-$110.00 per square yard. The cost to reconstruct all streets (full replacement of the pavement, base, and structure of the Streets) is over $37 million.
EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITION
The PCI is an overall measure of the condition of the street surface based on a scale of zero (0) (failed) to one hundred (100) (excellent). Table 3 (below) provides a brief description of the different distresses generally found in each PCI range.
Table 3
PCI Breakdown Descriptions
PCI Range Condition Description
90-100 Excellent Little or no distress.
70-89 Very Good
Little or no distress, with the exception of utility patches in good condition, or minor to moderate hairline cracks; typically lightly weathered.
50-69 Good Light to moderate weathering, light load-related base failure, moderate linear cracking.
25-49 Poor Moderate to severe weathering, moderate levels of base failure, moderate to heavy linear cracking.
0-24 Very Poor Extensive weathering, moderate to heavy base failure, failed patches, extensive network of moderate to heavy linear cracking.
Upon completion of this survey, a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) was calculated for each PMP segment to reflect the overall pavement condition. A PCI of 0 would correspond to a badly deteriorated pavement with no remaining service life whereas a PCI of 100 would correspond to a pavement with no observed distresses. A summary of each segments representative PCI and remaining service life can be found in the Pavement Condition Index Report in Appendix I.
The Citywide average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is 53. ‡PCI’s for the City’s pavement network were based on a visual distress rating system. The overall condition of City of St. Helena’s street network rests in the “Good” range. MTC’s State of Repair report states that “Approximately 75 percent of a pavement’s serviceable life has been expended by the time its PCI rating falls to
60.” City of St. Helena’s average PCI condition by functional class can be found in Table 4 (below).
Table 4
CLASSIFICATION PCI
Arterial 61
Collector 50
Residential/Local 54
Overall Network 53
PCI By Functional Class
‡Note: PCI weighted by area.
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 5
Figure 2 (below) shows the City’s total pavement mileage by condition category:
Figure 2
Table 5 (below) breaks down the percentage of the street network by functional class (by area) in each condition category. Approximately 16% of the City’s network is in the “Excellent,” approximately 18% in the “Very Good” condition category and approximately 23% is in the “Good” condition category. About 17% is in the “Poor” category and approximately 26% of streets are in the “Very Poor” condition category.
Table 5
Condition
Category
PCI
Range Arterial Collector Residential Total
Excellent 90-100 0.39% 5.10% 10.30% 15.79%
Very Good 70-89 1.52% 5.05% 11.13% 17.70%
Good 50-69 1.53% 12.67% 8.85% 23.06%
Poor 25-49 1.79% 7.49% 7.70% 16.98%
Very Poor 0-24 0.00% 11.02% 15.45% 26.48%
Totals 5.23% 41.33% 53.44% 100.00%
Percentage of Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category After the survey distress data was entered into the program, a distress rating was calculated for each PMP segment. The distress rating was calculated using MTC’s developed algorithms. The algorithms initially assign each pavement segment a score of 100 and then deducts point values based on the pavement distresses found within the segment weighted by the quantity of each distress. The algorithms assign deduct values based on the severity and the density of each distress. Figure 3 (below) is an example of the alligator cracking distress deduct curve:
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 6
Figure 3
The algorithms weigh the total deduct value within a segment and then calculate a total distress rating between 0 (failed) and 100 (excellent).
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
A visual survey of approximately 26 centerline miles of the City’s streets was conducted to assess the existing surface condition of each individual pavement segment within the street network.
Data, including distress types and quantities, segment length and width, etc. were collected/verified for all surveyed streets. Data was categorized by street name and “pavement” segment. PMP segment limits were identified by determining the logical maintenance practices that would be applied to each street and may vary from street to street, i.e. intersection to intersection, change in pavement width, drainage conditions, crown of the roadway, etc. Pavement rating is conducted on inspection units. An inspection unit is a small segment of the pavement or management section selected of convenient size that is then assessed in detail.
Once the PCI’s have been calculated for all the PMP segments, budget analyses and workload predictions can commence. Predictions of future pavement performances were based on a pavement deterioration curve developed by MTC. As a pavement ages, the system predicts the PCI of the pavement based on the deterioration curves.
Studies have shown that the life cycle of a pavement falls in a particular pattern over time (See Figure 4 below). Please note that this figure is not to scale. A street’s pavement begins its life in excellent condition and generally remains in excellent condition for a few years without the need of any maintenance. Over time, however, the condition of the street starts to worsen and the rate at which its pavement condition deteriorates* will increase dramatically as the street passes the midpoint of its life. As a result of this continued deterioration, the quantity and cost of the maintenance activities needed to rehabilitate the pavement will increase in both scope and costs. It is at this half way point that pavement repair options must be weighed. * A typical pavement section will deteriorate 40% in the first 75% of its lifespan. However, that same pavement section, if untreated, will experience another 40% reduction in overall quality in only the next 12% of lifespan, effectively deteriorating an equivalent amount in only one-sixth (1/6) of the time. 0 20
40 60
80 100
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
% of Density
Low Mod High
Alligator (Fatigue) Cracking
Deduct Curve
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 7
Figure 4
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT – APPLYING A COST EFFECTIVE TREATMENT Questions must be asked such as: Will the investment related to a preventive maintenance treatment be offset by the opportunity cost of not doing such a repair? Is the pavement in such a state that it would be better to simply wait until the pavement completely deteriorates before making the repair? The answers (and, indeed, the questions themselves) depend upon the individual pavement segment. Figure 4 (above) illustrates the benefit of addressing pavement concerns before the pavement condition reaches a poor or failed state. Maintenance activities increase the PCI value as they are applied to the segment and thus extend the pavement’s life. By allowing pavements to deteriorate, streets that once might cost $5.47/SY to microsurfae may soon cost $47.52/SY for a 2” Grind, 1” OL, Fabric & 2” Additional OL or $150/SY to reconstruct. In other words, delays in repairs can result in very large cost increases. It is not simply “pay today or pay tomorrow” but rather a “pay today or pay more tomorrow” proposition. Overall pavement maintenance costs are greatly reduced by the timely application of crack seals and microsurfacing before the subgrade fails and requires a total pavement reconstruction.
Table 6 (below) describes the condition categories, their equivalent PCI range, and typical prescribed maintenance treatments:
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 8
Table 6
Agency’s Maintenance Treatments By Condition Category
Condition PCI Range Typical Maintenance Treatment
Excellent 90-100 Do Nothing.
Very Good 70-89 Seal Cracks
Microsurfacing
Good 50-69 Microsurfacing
2” Grind & OL
Poor 25-49 2” Grind, 1” OL, Fabric & 2” Additional OL 2” Grind, 2” - 2.5” OL w/ Fabric
Very Poor 0-24 Reconstruction
2.5” OL w/ Fabric
Table 6 created by Harris & Associates based on feedback from the City.
The maintenance strategy described above was based on PCI scores and the corresponding condition category. Streets with PCI scores from 90-100 are considered to be in “Excellent” condition and require no treatment. Streets with score from 70 to 89 are considered “Very Good” and may require seal cracks or microsurfacing. Streets with scores from 50 to 69 are considered “Good,” but may require microsurfacing or 2” grind & overlay. Streets with scores from 25 to 49 are considered “Poor” and require 2” grind, 1” overlay, fabric & 2” additional overlay or 2” grind, 2”- 2.5” overlay with fabric. Streets with scores below 25 are “Very Poor” and are in need of structure reconstruction or 2.5” overlay with fabric. This survey showed that approximately 4 miles of the City’s streets are in the “Excellent” condition category, approximately 4 miles are in the “Very Good” category, approximately 6 miles are in the “Good” condition category, about 4 miles are in the “Poor” condition category, and 7 miles in the “Very Poor” condition category.
BUDGET NEEDS
Following the treatment strategy described in Table 6 (above) the MTC PMP software generated a Budget Needs analysis. The Budget Needs analysis projects the total budget needed to bring the City’s pavement system to a condition where most pavement sections require only preventive maintenance (i.e., PCI = 70 or higher). It is cost effective to keep pavement segments at or above a 70 PCI because the cost to maintain a high PCI is less than to bring a low PCI to a high PCI. The budget needs analysis work plan can be found in Appendix II-A.
The Budget Needs Average is defined as the cumulative budget needs (approximately $15.5 million) divided by the number of years in the analysis period (5 years). For this update, the Budget Needs Average was about $3.1 million per year. After the Budget Needs was calculated, Budget Scenarios were ran to determine the funding levels required to maintain and/or improve the current PCI level and generate a list of street maintenance for the next five (5) years. The software analyzed each pavement management segment and assigned each with a specific maintenance treatment (including do nothing) in order to maximize the improvement of the entire pavement network. Maintenance treatments were allocated to as many PMP segments as the annual budget would allow. The budget scenarios tested were calculated utilizing a 2% fixed preventativemaintenance-split. 5% interest, and 5% inflation were used. Citywide maintenance needs (over the five-year analysis) were calculated to be approximately $3.1 million. The results of the budget needs analysis are summarized in Table 7 (below).
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 9
Table 7
Year PCI
(Treated)
Untreated
PCI
Preventative
Maintenance
($M)
Rehab
($M)
Total Needs
($M)
2023 91 54 78,414 $ 14,182,797 $ 14,261,211 $
2024 86 52 66,494 $ 76,274 $ 142,768 $
2025 85 49 17,178 $ 179,419 $ 196,597 $
2026 83 46 49,686 $ 211,928 $ 261,614 $
2027 83 44 162,759 $ 489,625 $ 652,384 $
Totals N/A N/A 374,531 $ 15,140,043 $ 15,514,574 $
Budget Needs
Preventative Maintenance (PM) is a schedule of planned maintenance actions aimed at preventing the failure of streets. These actions are designed to detect, preclude, or mitigate degradation of a street segment. The goal of preventative maintenance is to minimize degradation and thus sustain or extend the useful life of the street. To reach that level of preventive maintenance for the entire network within the next 5 years (2023-2027), the Budget Needs analysis determined a total need of approximately $3.1 million per year. See Appendix II -A for the Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary.
The MTC PMP software recommended spending 2% of the budget toward preventive maintenance because it was the optimum level according to the specific conditions of the City’s network. This means that the program selected 2% of the annual budget towards seal cracks and microsurfacing while the remainder of the budget was spent towards microsurfacing, overlays, and reconstructions.
These budgets do not account for stopgap maintenance repairs, such as emergency pothole repair.
BUDGET ANALYSIS/SCENARIOS
After the MTC PMP software analyzed the pavement system according to the specified annual budgets over the 5 year analysis period, trends were evident in the PCI and deferred maintenance backlog (the amount of necessary reconstruction and overlays not performed each year due to budget constraints). An increase in deferred maintenance showed that necessary rehabilitation is currently not being performed. The total deferred maintenance in 2023 was approximately $14.26 million.
Deferred maintenance consists of pavement maintenance that is needed but cannot be performed due to lack of funding. Shrinking budgets have forced many agencies to defer much needed street maintenance. Deferring maintenance not only increases the frequency of resident complaints about the network condition, but also increases the costs to repair the streets. It is cost effective to keep the pavement above a certain PCI because the cost to maintain a high PCI is less than the cost to bring a street segment with a low PCI to a high PCI.
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 10
For this update, the following five annual budget scenarios were generated:
1. No Funds ($0)
2. Maintain PCI of 53 ($750 thousand)
3. Five Point Increase in PCI ($1.05 million)
4. Expected Annual Budget ($1.2 million)
5. Budget Needs Average ($3.1 million)
The following terms are defined for each of the budget scenarios:
“Year” – Year of the program
“Budget” – The projected budget for the given year
“Work Program” – The amount of money programmed to be expended, not to exceed the budget, based on the pavement maintenance needs as prioritized. “Deferred” or “Deferred Maintenance” – The amount of money project for pavement maintenance that cannot be performed due to the lack of funding. The total pavement maintenance needs less the work program.
“Average Condition” – The projected average pavement Condition Index after completion of the Work Program.
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 11
No Funds ($0) - If the City spent no money over the next 5 years on pavement maintenance needs, the amount of deferred maintenance (or “backlog”) would increase from approximately $14.26 in 2023 million to approximately $21.70 million in 2027 and the average pavement condition index would decrease from 53 in 2023 to 44 in 2027.
Year Budget Work
Program
Deferred
Maintenance
Average
Network
PCI
2023
(Prior to
Treatment) $14,261,211 53
2023 $0 $0 $14,261,211 54
2024 $0 $0 $15,667,692 52
2025 $0 $0 $17,621,983 49
2026 $0 $0 $19,060,525 46
2027 $0 $0 $21,703,036 44
No Funds ($0)
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 12
Maintain PCI of 53 ($750 thousand) – In order to maintain the network PCI of 53 over the next 5 years, approximately $750 thousand per year would need to be budgeted. Using this budget, the deferred maintenance would increase from approximately $14.26 million in 2023 to approximately $17.77 million in 2027.
Year Budget Work
Program
Deferred
Maintenance
Average
Network
PCI
2023
(Prior to
Treatment) $14,261,211 53
2023 $750,000 $722,846 $13,538,364 57
2024 $750,000 $748,888 $14,159,815 55
2025 $750,000 $746,563 $15,292,149 55
2026 $750,000 $747,507 $15,866,692 54
2027 $750,000 $748,532 $17,766,271 53
Maintain PCI of 53 ($750 thousand)
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 13
Five Point Increase in PCI ($1.05 million) – In order to increase the network PCI by 5 points over the next 5 years, approximately $1.05 million per year would need to be budgeted. Using this budget, the deferred maintenance would increase from approximately $14.26 million in 2023 to approximately $16.37 million in 2027.
Year Budget Work
Program
Deferred
Maintenance
Average
Network
PCI
2023
(Prior to
Treatment) $14,261,211 53
2023 $1,050,000 $1,012,681 $13,248,529 57
2024 $1,050,000 $1,048,526 $13,555,850 57
2025 $1,050,000 $1,048,231 $14,356,318 58
2026 $1,050,000 $1,048,675 $14,771,291 58
2027 $1,050,000 $1,048,732 $16,374,708 58
Five Point Increase in PCI ($1.05 million)
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 14
Expected Annual Budget ($1.2 million) – The City has estimated its expected annual budget over the next 5 years to be $1.2 million. The City also has a planned Measure T program for the next five years which were incorporated into the analysis for each year. For this scenario, the weighing factors for Arterial sections were adjusted from 1.00 to 0.72 in order for more residential sections to be selected for treatment. Using the budget allocation of $1.2 million, the deferred maintenance would decrease from $14.26 million in 2023 to approximately $12.86 million in 2027 and the network PCI would increase to 62. The sections as part of the Measure T program are indicated with “**” in the EAB ($1.2 million) – Section Selected for Treatment report that can be found in Appendix II-E.
.
Year Budget Work
Program
Deferred
Maintenance
Average
Network
PCI
2023
(Prior to
Treatment) $14,261,211 53
2023 $1,200,000 $1,170,286 $8,964,330 58
2024 $1,200,000 $1,189,742 $9,393,264 59
2025 $1,200,000 $1,197,779 $11,143,266 60
2026 $1,200,000 $1,183,720 $10,705,119 61
2027 $1,200,000 $1,190,509 $12,863,377 62
Expected Annual Budget ($1.2 million)
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 15
Budget Needs Average ($3.1 million) – In order to get the network to an optimal level in which only preventative maintenance is needed, approximately $3.1 million would need to be budgeted each year based on the budget needs calculation. This would increase the network PCI from a 53 to a 78 and decrease the deferred maintenance to $5.42 million by year 2027.
Year Budget Work
Program
Deferred
Maintenance
Average
Network
PCI
2023
(Prior to
Treatment) $14,261,211 53
2023 $3,100,000 $3,024,654 $11,236,557 65
2024 $3,100,000 $3,037,783 $9,454,023 71
2025 $3,100,000 $2,975,892 $8,121,738 73
2026 $3,100,000 $2,987,881 $6,285,777 75
2027 $3,100,000 $3,097,165 $5,416,485 78
Budget Needs Average ($3.1 million)
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 16
Figure 5 and 6 (below) show the impact each of the five budgets have on the PCI and deferred maintenance backlog. These charts can also be found in Appendix II-B & C. The Cost Summary Reports, which provide information on pavement funding distribution by pavement condition and the Network Condition Summary Reports, which project pavement condition trends, can be found in Appendix II-D.
Figure 5
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 17
Figure 6
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 18
Figure 7
Figure 7 (above) shows the impacts of the City’s network PCI and backlog for the five generated scenarios.
PROGRAM BUDGET OPTIONS AND PMP SUGGESTIONS
Harris & Associates recommends that the Agency spends their expected annual budget of $1.2 million. Spending this budget and incorporating the planned sections from the Measure T program increases the PCI from a 53 to a 62 after 5 years and at the same time slows the growth of the deferred maintenance backlog.
The City should continue to utilize cost effective treatments where appropriate, such as microsurfacing and crack seals and evaluate emerging cost effective techniques such as thin-bonded wearing courses and rubberized overlays. Any maintenance and rehabilitation treatments that are performed should always be input into the MTC PMP software (Harris can do this at the agency’s request).
Harris & Associates commends the City for its active participation in the pavement management program and recommends that the City continue to maintain its pavement management program in order to be eligible for federal grants and funding. Harris recommends that all arterial and collector routes be re-surveyed every two years and all residential streets every four years. The costs for the Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 19
distress surveys should be included in the annual pavement management budget.
The City should also perform annual database updates that include:
Reviewing and updating the decision tree (maintenance activities and unit costs) Updating the street network when streets are annexed or newly constructed Continuing to input maintenance and rehabilitation activities The City should update its Finance Department with any changes or adjustments that have been made to the street network and subsystems (streets assets and pavement subsystems that have been acquired through annexation, deletion, etc.) for GASB‐34 compliance.
The City should continue utilizing the StreetSaver Online GIS module or in-house GIS to assist in managing the streets within the City limits. GIS technology is very useful to spatially view tabular reports and data that are derived from the pavement management system, such as scenarios, identification of maintenance and rehabilitation treatments, planning, maintenance and rehabilitation history, pavement condition index, etc.
The City of St. Helena’s street network is currently in the range of MTC’s “Good” condition category. To help maintain and or improve the current condition, certain projects have been recommended within the context of this report. Annual work program reports for the expected annual budgets be found in Appendix II-E. These reports provide detailed listings of suggested maintenance projects for the City of St. Helena based on the overall PMP suggested needs funding and base annual budgets. The report also provides a first step in identifying segments to be treated under City of St. Helena’s annual work programs.
LIMITS OF STUDY
It must be recognized that this report is limited to the existing pavement repairs. It does not include existing deficiencies for right-of-way concrete sidewalks, curb & gutter, drainage, trees, bus pads and non-structural improvements such as decorative crosswalks, medians, lighting and street furniture.
Costs for these right-of-way repairs and improvements throughout the City would easily exceed the deferred maintenance costs (the cost of crucial maintenance work not performed in a specific year) identified in this report and can be identified and estimated separately in future reports.
The following recommendations generated by the Pavement Management Program are for planning purposes only. The resulting general recommendations are not intended to replace sound engineering judgment, which should dictate specific needs for an individual project. Final project recommendations should be weighed against the actual approach the City wishes to utilize in scheduling the workloads for contracting purposes. Once a street segment is identified for repair, a closer site visit and detailed project repair scope is required.
Maintenance and rehabilitation projects should be based on a combination of the system’s recommendations weighed against the City’s preferences, budget constraints, and other contributing factors. In addition, further refinements may be warranted from an engineering staff review of the pavement condition. For example, a particular pavement section may have been selected for a treatment in a given year but that work may need be postponed in order to coordinate activities with other planned work, such as utility replacement work.
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 20
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
Based on the results of the condition survey and input from the City, pavement maintenance/rehabilitation strategies were developed. A standard agreement at the outset was to identify the City’s maintenance work program for the next five (5) years, showing resource alternatives that affect the maintenance backlog and increase the overall condition of the pavement network.
Strategies have been recommended to come up with the most cost-effective work programs. A listing of the maintenance activities utilized in the strategy development can be found in Appendix III-C. Each activity represents the type of work that has been recommended for the long-term maintenance recommendations of the City’s streets.
ANNUAL BUDGET PROJECTIONS
The budgeting process was approached with the following in mind: generate a work program for the next five (5) years based upon actual street pavement conditions and determine the funding levels required to maintain and/or improve the current level (PCI) of overall condition.
Based on current and projected pavement maintenance needs, annual work plan program alternatives have been prepared. A detailed work plan program for the City’s expected annual budget (2% applied towards PM) can be found in Appendix II-E.
The following section provides a description of the methodology and rationale utilized in determining the recommended actions identified in this report.
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENTS
The PCI is used by the program to schedule maintenance activities for each pavement segment. The program recommends a specific maintenance activity based on the PCI and budget constraints. The City has selected a series of maintenance activities to apply to the pavement network. The unit costs for each maintenance activity account for various construction costs including labor materials, design, for construction inspection and for contingency. Definitions of each maintenance activity are defined as below:
1. Crack Seals - A surface treatment generally utilized to prevent entry of water or other non compressible substances into the pavement.
Crack seals are used to fill individual pavement cracks to prevent entry of water or other noncompressible substances such as sand, dirt, rocks or weeds. Crack sealant is typically used on early stage longitudinal cracks, transverse cracks and reflection cracks.
2. Microsurfacing – A surface treatment generally utilized to provide new wearing surfaces and prevent water penetration of the pavement surface, thereby extending pavement life.
Microsurfacing is a polymer-modified cold-mix paving system that begins as a mixture of densegraded aggregate, asphalt emulsion, water, and mineral fillers. While conventional slurry seal is widely used as an economical treatment for sealing and extends the service life, micro surfacing has added capabilities including advanced polymers and other modern additives.
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 21
3. Overlay with Fabric - are made from polypropylene or polyester fibers and are used in conjunction with asphalt resurfacing projects.
A liquid asphalt tack coat is sprayed on existing (or pre-leveled) pavement surface followed by the installation of the overlay fabric. A final aggregate asphalt surface course is then placed directly on the overlay fabric. The heat from the asphalt surface brings the underlying liquid tack coat through the fabric creating a fabric-saturated membrane that is bonded to the old and new pavement. It has been found that Pavement Overlay Fabric will delay reflective cracking in asphalt pavement overlays. The Pavement Overlay Fabric forms a waterproof barrier which prevents moisture from infiltrating the pavement and subgrade.
4. Reconstruction – The removal and replacement of either the pavement surface only or both the pavement and base.
When the pavement surface is severely distressed and has reached the end of its service life, reconstruction methods are recommended. Some of these methods include Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) in which the old asphalt and base materials are pulverized, mixed with cement and water, and compacted to produce a strong, durable base for either an asphalt or concrete surface. Cold in Place Recycling is another method used in which two to five inches of the current street surface are pulverized down to a specific aggregate size, mixed with a rejuvenating asphalt emulsion, and then reused to pave that same street. After a reconstruction, the pavement segment is considered new with a full life extension (typically 28 years).
MAINTENANCE DECISIONS
Once the City has selected the appropriate maintenance activities and calculated unit costs, the “Maintenance Decision Tree” (a StreetSaver application that lists all the treatments and corresponding unit costs; found in Appendix III-C) was updated. This decision tree assigns appropriate treatments by the specific needs of the streets.
The decision tree lists costs associated with treatments on specific types of pavement according to the jurisdiction. StreetSaver® uses a decision tree to model the decision-making process that agencies follow to select a maintenance or rehabilitation strategy. The decision tree contains "branches" for each functional classification, surface type, and condition category. Jurisdictions can outline their maintenance and rehabilitation strategy, choosing a treatment for each branch.
After the decision tree was established, selected budgets and work assignments were generated for each work program on an annual basis. Using the MTC recommended pavement deterioration curve for each pavement surface type and functional class, the program calculated the PCI based on the condition survey; then depending on what category the PCI was in, a preventative maintenance or rehab treatment was selected based on the weighted effectiveness and available budget. Both current and future work requirements for each pavement segment within the City were then determined.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORTS
This report contains a comprehensive assemblage of pavement management reports ranging from summary reports to annual maintenance and rehabilitation scheduled reports. These reports represent reasonable projections of pavement maintenance needs and performance based on the visual Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
Page | 22
condition assessment, unit cost estimates, and pavement deterioration models.
It is important to note that pavement segment dimensions and surface area, along with the recommended treatment and repair costs presented in this report, are for initial planning purposes only and will be subject to project level evaluation, design, and cost estimation. This is noteworthy due to the "implied" accuracy of reporting length and width to the nearest foot, surface area to the nearest square foot, and treatment and repair unit costs and project estimates to the nearest penny and dollar, respectively.
SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
Harris & Associates recommends that the City continue developing annual maintenance plans while also working towards reducing the present backlog of rehabilitation projects.
In order to ensure that report outputs are accurate and credible, it is essential that the integrity of all data files be maintained. Prior to generating scenarios, all necessary updates to unit cost information and treatment data should be complete. In addition, the entire pavement network will have to be resurveyed at regular intervals, as noted earlier in this report. This not only allows future work to be scheduled based on the most current condition data available, but it also provides City personnel with a means to more accurately monitor rates of pavement deterioration.
Agenda Item #15.3.
PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
APPENDIX I
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) REPORT / REMAINING
SERVICE LIFE (RSL) REPORT
Agenda Item #15.3.
Section PCI Listing Report
This report lists the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for each pavement management section.
Street Name: Street Name
Street ID: Street Identifier - 6 characters
Section ID: Section Identifier – 6 characters
From: Beginning of Section
To: End of Section
Length: Length of Section (LF)
Width: Width of Section (LF)
Functional Class: Type of Functional Class for Section
Surface Type: Type of surface for Section
PCI: Pavement Condition Index (PCI) number at time of
calculation
PCI Date: Date of Inspection or PCI calculation
Agenda Item #15.3.
City of St. Helena
Printed: 8/7/2023
Section PCI/RSL Listing
Street ID Section ID Length Width Area Functional Class Surface Type Current
Street Name From To PCI
Remaining
Life
ADAMS 10 ADAMS ST HUDSON AV ALLYN AV 475 34 16,150 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 64 18.63 ADAMS 20 ADAMS ST ALLYN AV STOCKTON ST 730 34 24,820 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 70 22.45 ADAMS 30 ADAMS ST STOCKTON ST KEARNEY ST 710 38 26,980 R - Residential/Local C - AC/PCC 73 24.46 ADAMS 40 ADAMS ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 400 40 16,000 R - Residential/Local C - AC/PCC 69 21.79 ADAMS 50 ADAMS ST OAK AV MAIN ST 355 32 11,360 C - Collector O - AC/AC 68 16.01 ADAMS 60 ADAMS ST 60' E/O MAIN ST MAIN ST 60 30 1,800 C - Collector P - PCC 34 4.35 70 ADAMS ST COP BEFORE RAILROAD 406 27 10,962 C - Collector O - AC/AC 55 AV
ADAMS 60' E/O MAIN ST 9.12
75 ADAMS ST COP @ LIBRARY LN COP BEFORE 324 37 11,988 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 79
RAILROAD AV
ADAMS 28.77
80 ADAMS ST COP @ BUSINESS 300 37 11,100 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 88
CENTER DWY
ADAMS COP @ LIBRARY LN 44.90
90 ADAMS ST END (E) COP @ BUSINESS 280 37 10,360 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 84
CENTER DWY
ADAMS 36.56
10 ALEXANDER CT 510 20 10,200 NCR - Proposed; 39
Private; Non-County
ALEXAN MAIN ST MAIN ST O - AC/AC 5.55
ALLISO 10 ALLISON AV CHARTER OAK AV POPE ST 890 35 31,150 C - Collector O - AC/AC 92 29.49 ALLYN 10 ALLYN AV MADRONA ST PINE ST 430 37 15,910 C - Collector O - AC/AC 44 5.52 ALLYN 20 ALLYN AV PINE ST ADAMS ST 440 39 17,160 C - Collector O - AC/AC 39 4.17 ALLYN 30 ALLYN AV ADAMS ST TAINTER ST 340 37 12,580 C - Collector O - AC/AC 57 10.20 ALLYN 40 ALLYN AV TAINTER ST SPRING ST 560 37 20,720 C - Collector O - AC/AC 43 5.17 ANDREA 10 ANDREA AV KEARNEY ST OAK AV 410 42 17,220 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 27 0.57 10 ARROWHEAD DR BCR @ SULPHUR 750 33 24,750 R - Residential/Local A - AC 54
SPRINGS RD
ARROWH END (S) 11.82
BIRCH 10 BIRCH ST VALLEYVIEW ST NORTH CRANE AV 780 33 25,740 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 42 6.90 BROWN 10 BROWN ST ALLISON AV END (W) 490 33 16,170 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 93 47.59 CHABLI 10 A CHABLIS CIR PINOT WAY 500' NE/O PINT WAY (E) 500 33 16,500 R - Residential/Local A - AC 29 1.19 CHABLI 10 B CHABLIS CIR PINOT WAY END 102 65 6,630 R - Residential/Local A - AC 35 3.37 CHABLI 20 CHABLIS CIR PINOT WY 500' NE/O PINOT WY (E) 490 33 16,170 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 47 9.83 CHARDO 10 CHARDONNAY WY SPRING ST PINOT WY 610 37 22,570 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 20 0.00 CTROAK 10 CHARTER OAK AV CARWASH END (E) 640 22 14,080 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 18 0.00 CTROAK 20 CHARTER OAK AV MAIN ST CARWASH 230 37 8,510 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 7 0.00 CTROAK 30 CHARTER OAK AV MAIN ST ALLISON AV 1,130 35 39,550 C - Collector O - AC/AC 92 29.49 CHILES 10 CHILES AV POPE ST SIGNORELLI CIR 1,220 35 42,700 R - Residential/Local A - AC 61 15.37 CHILES 20 CHILES AV SIGNORELLI CIR END (E) 530 35 18,550 R - Residential/Local A - AC 74 24.07 CHRIST 10 CHRISTINE CT PARK ST END (E) 210 33 6,930 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 38.00 CHURCH 10 CHURCH ST HUNT AV POPE ST 650 29 18,850 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 76 26.53 Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver Agenda Item #15.3. Page 389 of 514 Street ID Section ID Length Width Area Functional Class Surface Type Current
Street Name From To PCI
Remaining
Life
COLLEG 10 A COLLEGE AV POPE ST PVMNT CHG 874 34 29,716 C - Collector O - AC/AC 94 29.90 COLLEG 10 B COLLEGE AV PVMNT CHG END (S) 356 34 12,104 C - Collector O - AC/AC 94 29.90 COLUMB 10 COLUMBARD CT CHARDONNAY WY END (W) 430 33 14,190 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 47 9.83 CRINEL 10 CRINELLA DR MAIN ST PARK ST 340 38 12,920 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 51.94 CRINEL 20 CRINELLA DR PARK ST PUMP STATION 775 34 26,350 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 38.00 CRINEL 30 CRINELLA DR PUMP STATION PARK ST 740 33 24,420 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 38.00 DAHLIA 10 DAHLIA ST MAGNOLIA AVE EL BONITA AV (N) 266 26 6,916 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 93 37.42 DORIS 10 DORIS AV VINEYARD AV END (W) 120 34 4,080 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 81 30.03 DORISC 10 DORIS CT VINEYARD AV END (E) 190 35 6,650 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 73 24.44 DOWDEL 10 DOWDELL LN MAIN ST FOUNTAIN ST 220 37 8,140 C - Collector O - AC/AC 25 0.09 DOWDEL 20 DOWDELL LN FOUNTAIN ST MONTESSORI @ COP 930 37 34,410 C - Collector O - AC/AC 16 0.00 DOWDEL 30 DOWDELL LN MONTESSORI @ COP HOUSE 867 260 30 7,800 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 16 0.00 DOWDEL 40 DOWDELL LN HOUSE 867 HOUSE 759 450 12 5,400 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 23 0.00 DOWDEL 50 DOWDELL LN HOUSE 759 HOUSE 679 350 11 3,850 R - Residential/Local A - AC 12 0.00 EDWARD 10 EDWARDS ST HUNT AV POPE ST 750 31 23,250 R - Residential/Local A - AC 19 0.00 10 EL BONITA AV LA QUINTA WY COP (CHANGE OF 150 33 4,950 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94
PAVEMENT)
ELBONI 37.76
20 EL BONITA AV COP (CHANGE OF 108 33 3,564 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94
PAVEMENT)
ELBONI DAHLIA ST 37.76
ELBONI 30 EL BONITA AV DAHLIA ST BCR @ MAIN ST 1,036 34 35,224 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 37.76 ELBONICT 10 EL BONITA CT EL BONITA AVE END 120 35 8,313 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 93 53.28 ELMHUR 10 ELMHURST AV GRANGER WY SPRING MOUNTAIN RD 470 33 15,510 C - Collector O - AC/AC 73 19.15 ELMHUR 20 ELMHURST AV MAIN ST GRANGER WY 775 33 25,575 C - Collector O - AC/AC 77 21.14 FOUNT 10 FOUNTAIN ST DOWDELL LN END (N) 380 37 14,060 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 17 0.00 FULTON 10 FULTON LN MAIN ST RAILROAD AV 380 31 11,780 C - Collector C - AC/PCC 45 5.55 FULTON 20 FULTON LN RAILROAD AV RR TRACKS 300 22 6,600 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 33 2.89 FULTON 30 FULTON LN RR TRACKS 25 MPH SIGN 925 14 12,950 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 28 1.01 FULTON 40 FULTON LN 25 MPH SIGN END (E)/CITY LIMITS 1,420 13 18,460 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 54 12.88 10 GRAYSON AV SOUTH CRANE AV 1120' E/O SOUTH 1,120 33 36,960 C - Collector O - AC/AC 11
CRANE AV
GRAYSN 0.00
20 GRAYSON AV 1120' E/O SOUTH CRANE 820 33 27,060 C - Collector O - AC/AC 14 AV
1940' E/O SOUTH
CRANE AV
GRAYSN 0.00
30 GRAYSON AV 1940' E/O SOUTH CRANE 670 37 24,790 C - Collector O - AC/AC 20 AV
GRAYSN MAIN ST 0.00
GROVE 10 GROVE CT HUNT AV END (N) 420 34 14,280 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 90 40.57 HARVES 10 HARVEST LN STARR AV END (W) 220 33 7,260 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 65 19.25 HENRY 10 HENRY CT PARK ST END (E) 140 34 4,760 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 38.03 HILLVW 05 HILLVIEW PL END (W) SCOTT ST 160 27 4,320 R - Residential/Local A - AC 19 0.00 Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena Section PCI/RSL Listing
Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver Agenda Item #15.3. Page 390 of 514 Street ID Section ID Length Width Area Functional Class Surface Type Current
Street Name From To PCI
Remaining
Life
HILLVW 10 HILLVIEW PL SCOTT ST VINEYARD AV 350 30 10,500 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 17 0.00 HILLVW 20 HILLVIEW PL VINEYARD AV STOCKTON ST 350 28 9,800 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 16 0.00 HILLVW 30 HILLVIEW PL STOCKTON ST SPRING MOUNTAIN RD 360 30 10,800 R - Residential/Local A - AC 16 0.00 HILLVW 40 HILLVIEW PL SPRING MOUNTAIN RD OAK AV 770 34 26,180 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 74 25.15
HOWELL MOUNTAIN
RD
HOWMTN 10 SILVERADO TRAIL MEADOWWOOD LN 910 21 19,110 C - Collector O - AC/AC 66 14.93
HOWELL MOUNTAIN
RD
HOWMTN 20 MEADOWWOOD LN OAKWOOD LN 1,080 19 20,520 C - Collector O - AC/AC 65 14.41
HOWELL MOUNTAIN
RD
HOWMTN 30 OAKWOOD LN RIDGEVIEW LN 1,260 20 25,200 C - Collector O - AC/AC 67 15.45
HOWELL MOUNTAIN
RD
HOWMTN 40 RIDGEVIEW LN CITY LIMITS 2,310 23 53,130 C - Collector A - AC 62 8.74
HOWELL MOUNTAIN
RD
HOWMTN 50 CITY LIMITS (N) CITY LIMITS (S) 720 22 15,840 C - Collector O - AC/AC 69 16.52 HUDSON 10 HUDSON AV MADRONA ST ADAMS ST 845 32 27,040 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 58 15.09 HUDSON 20 HUDSON AV ADAMS ST SPRING ST 870 32 27,840 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 79 28.64 HUDSON 30 HUDSON AV SPRING ST BIRCH ST 1,080 34 36,720 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 76 26.53 HUNT 10 HUNT AV MAIN ST CHURCH ST 276 40 11,040 C - Collector O - AC/AC 71 17.66 HUNT 20 HUNT AV CHURCH ST EDWARDS ST 325 36 11,700 C - Collector O - AC/AC 65 14.44 HUNT 30 HUNT AV EDWARDS ST JUNE LN 485 35 16,975 C - Collector O - AC/AC 32 2.02 HUNT 40 HUNT AV JUNE LN GROVE CT 670 32 21,440 C - Collector O - AC/AC 79 23.22 HUNT 50 HUNT AV GROVE CT MONTE VISTA 240 35 8,400 C - Collector O - AC/AC 75 19.91 HUNT 60 HUNT AV MONTE VISTA STARR AV 530 30 15,900 C - Collector O - AC/AC 92 29.49 JUNELN 10 JUNE LN HUNT AV CHILES AV 245 35 8,575 R - Residential/Local A - AC 59 13.72 KEARN 10 KEARNEY ST HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 540 42 22,680 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 38 5.24 KEARN 20 KEARNEY ST MADRONA ST PINE ST 370 29 10,730 R - Residential/Local C - AC/PCC 55 14.48 KEARN 30 KEARNEY ST PINE ST ADAMS ST 590 28 16,520 R - Residential/Local C - AC/PCC 50 11.42 KEARN 40 KEARNEY ST TAINTER ST SPRING ST 390 24 9,360 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 70 22.45 KENNED 10 KENNEDY CT LA QUINTA WY END (W) 390 33 12,870 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 37.77 KIDDRD 10 KIDD RANCH RD MCCORKLE AV END (S) 485 25 12,125 R - Residential/Local A - AC 43 6.28 LAFATA 10 LA FATA ST DOWDELL LN MILLS LN 550 37 20,350 C - Collector O - AC/AC 24 0.00 LAFATA 20 LA FATA ST DOWDELL LN VINTAGE AV 890 38 33,820 C - Collector O - AC/AC 60 11.98 LAQUIN 10 LA QUINTA WY END (N) END (S) 360 33 11,880 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 91 46.03 LIBRAR 10 LIBRARY LN ADAMS ST END (N) 460 37 17,020 R - Residential/Local A - AC 75 22.68 MADRON 10 MADRONA ST REISLING WY FIR HILL DR 1,040 20 20,800 C - Collector O - AC/AC 52 8.52 20 MADRONA ST FIR HILL DR SPOTSWOOD (ROAD 770 17 13,090 C - Collector O - AC/AC 28
WIDENS)
MADRON 0.90
25 MADRONA ST SPOTSWOOD (ROAD 330 29 9,570 C - Collector O - AC/AC 86
WIDENS)
MADRON HUDSON AV 26.54
Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena Section PCI/RSL Listing
Criteria: 3 MTC StreetSaver Agenda Item #15.3. Page 391 of 514 Street ID Section ID Length Width Area Functional Class Surface Type Current
Street Name From To PCI
Remaining
25 MADRONA ST SPOTSWOOD (ROAD 330 29 9,570 C - Collector O - AC/AC 86 Life
WIDENS)
MADRON HUDSON AV 26.54
MADRON 30 MADRONA ST HUDSON AV SCOTT ST 660 40 26,400 C - Collector O - AC/AC 65 14.22 MADRON 40 MADRONA ST SCOTT ST VINEYARD AV 355 40 14,200 C - Collector O - AC/AC 62 12.61 MADRON 50 MADRONA ST VINEYARD AV SPRING MOUNTAIN RD 725 40 29,000 C - Collector O - AC/AC 63 13.13 MADRON 60 MADRONA ST SPRING MOUNTAIN RD OAK AV 690 32 22,080 C - Collector O - AC/AC 73 18.77 MADRON 70 MADRONA ST OAK AV MAIN ST 350 30 10,500 C - Collector O - AC/AC 66 14.95 MAGNO 10 MAGNOLIA AVE ROSEBUD LN E END 181 26 4,706 R - Residential/Local A - AC 93 33.22 MAGNO 20 MAGNOLIA AVE ROSEBUD LN DAHLIA ST 539 26 14,014 R - Residential/Local A - AC 93 33.22 MARIPO 10 MARIPOSA LN MCCORKLE AV POPE ST 695 33 22,935 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 17 0.00 MCCORK 10 MCCORKLE AV END (W) ALLISON AV 300 27 8,100 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 59 15.66 MCCORK 20 MCCORKLE AV ALLISON AV MARIPOSA LN 320 24 7,680 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 10 0.00 MCCORK 30 MCCORKLE AV MARIPOSA LN END (E) 760 29 22,040 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 15 0.00 MCCORM 10 MCCORMICK ST DOWDELL LN VINTAGE AV 915 37 33,855 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 12 0.00 MEADCK 10 MEADOWCREEK CIR STARR AV (N) STARR AV (S) 1,110 34 37,740 R - Residential/Local A - AC 22 0.00 MILLS 10 MILLS LN MAIN ST LA FATA ST 870 14 12,180 C - Collector O - AC/AC 65 14.41 MILLS 20 MILLS LN LA FATA ST MAILBOX 458 (COP) 2,110 14 29,540 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 60 16.24 MILLS 30 MILLS LN MAILBOX 458 (COP) END (E) 1,170 14 16,380 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 68 21.15 MITCH 10 MITCHELL DR NORTH CRANE AV VOORHEES CIR 300 29 8,700 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 23 0.00 MITCH 20 MITCHELL DR VOORHEES CIR (W) VOORHEES CIR (E) 585 29 16,965 R - Residential/Local A - AC 15 0.00 MITCH 30 MITCHELL DR VOORHEES CIR ST JAMES DR 580 29 16,820 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 16 0.00 MITCH 40 MITCHELL DR ST JAMES DR OAK AV 490 36 17,640 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 4 0.00 MITCH 50 MITCHELL DR OAK AV BCR @ MAIN ST 335 40 13,400 C - Collector O - AC/AC 42 4.84 MONEY 10 MONEY WY SPRING ST ADAMS ST 820 20 16,400 R - Residential/Local A - AC 73 21.57 MONVIS 10 MONTE VISTA HUNT AV END (N) 375 33 12,375 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 37.77 NCRANE 10 NORTH CRANE AV SPRING ST MITCHELL DR 715 30 21,450 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 86 33.52 NCRANE 20 NORTH CRANE AV MITCHELL DR END (S) 717 35 25,095 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 79 28.64 OAK 10 OAK AV HILLVIEW pL MADRONA ST 550 37 20,350 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 70 25.82 OAK 20 OAK AV MADRONA ST PINE ST 415 34 14,110 C - Collector O - AC/AC 9 0.00 OAK 30 OAK AV PINE ST ADAMS ST 590 34 20,060 C - Collector O - AC/AC 15 0.00 OAK 40 OAK AV ADAMS ST TAINTER ST 460 37 17,020 C - Collector A - AC 47 4.76 OAK 50 OAK AV TAINTER ST SPRING ST 390 40 15,600 C - Collector O - AC/AC 32 1.73 OAK 60 OAK AV SPRING ST MITCHELL DR 460 36 16,560 C - Collector O - AC/AC 51 7.66 OLIVE 10 OLIVE AV HUDSON ST VALLEYVIEW ST 610 34 20,740 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 90 36.00 PARK 10 PARK ST PRATT AV CHRISTINE CT 670 37 24,790 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 93 47.61 PARK 20 PARK ST CHRISTINE CT CRINELLA DR 445 37 16,465 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 38.03 PAULSN 10 PAULSON CT POPE ST END (N) 415 35 14,525 R - Residential/Local A - AC 79 25.34 Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena Section PCI/RSL Listing
Criteria: 4 MTC StreetSaver Agenda Item #15.3. Page 392 of 514 Street ID Section ID Length Width Area Functional Class Surface Type Current
Street Name From To PCI
Remaining
Life
PINE 10 PINE ST HUDSON AV ALLYN AV 610 33 20,130 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 11 0.00 PINE 20 PINE ST ALLYN AV END (E) 480 33 15,840 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 24 0.00 PINE 30 PINE ST STOCKTON ST END (E) 430 36 15,480 R - Residential/Local A - AC 75 24.87 PINE 40 PINE ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 400 25 10,000 R - Residential/Local C - AC/PCC 41 6.40 PINE 50 PINE ST OAK AV MAIN ST 314 36 11,304 R - Residential/Local C - AC/PCC 54 12.91 PINE 60 PINE ST MAIN ST FIRE STATION 154 33 5,082 R - Residential/Local C - AC/PCC 86 33.53 PINOT 10 PINOT WY SYLVANER AV CHABLIS CIR 290 33 9,570 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 20 0.00 PINOT 20 PINOT WY CHABLIS CIR CHARDONNAY WY 370 33 12,210 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 13 0.00 PINOT 30 PINOT WY CHARDONNAY WY END (E) 575 33 18,975 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 33 3.06 POPE 10 POPE ST MAIN ST CHURCH ST 230 39 8,970 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 37 3.22 POPE 20 POPE ST CHURCH ST EDWARDS ST 350 42 14,700 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 60 11.20 POPE 25 POPE ST EDWARDS ST CHILES AV 320 42 13,440 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 77 20.46 POPE 30 POPE ST CHILES AV ALLISON AV 266 23 6,118 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 79 22.00 POPE 40 POPE ST ALLISON AV MARIPOSA LN 450 38 17,100 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 78 21.22 POPE 50 POPE ST MARIPOSA LN STARR AV 750 37 27,750 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 69 15.65 POPE 60 POPE ST STARR AV PEPPERTREE CIR 575 28 16,100 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 94 29.22 POPE 70 POPE ST PEPPERTREE CIR COLLEGE AV 630 33 20,790 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 66 14.07 POPE 80 POPE ST COLLEGE AV BEGIN BRIDGE 400 39 15,600 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 75 19.07 POPE 90 POPE ST BEGIN BRIDGE SILVERADO TRAIL 500 21 10,500 A - Arterial A - AC 79 22.10 PRATT 10 PRATT AV MAIN ST RR TRACKS 1,300 35 45,500 C - Collector O - AC/AC 54 9.34 PRATT 20 PRATT AV RR TRACKS END OF CURB 360 41 14,760 C - Collector O - AC/AC 8 0.00 30 PRATT AV END OF CURB 2000' FROM BRIDGE (35 760 24 18,240 C - Collector O - AC/AC 7
MPH SIGN
PRATT 0.00
40 PRATT AV 2000' FROM BRIDGE (35 2,080 24 49,920 C - Collector O - AC/AC 10
MPH SIGN
PRATT BRIDGE 0.00
PRATT 50 PRATT AV BRIDGE BRIDGE 1,000 24 24,000 C - Collector O - AC/AC 0 0.00 QUAIL 10 QUAIL CT ELMHURST AV END (N) 440 33 14,520 R - Residential/Local A - AC 61 15.78 RAILRD 10 RAILROAD AV FIRE STATION FULTON LN 615 30 18,450 C - Collector O - AC/AC 27 0.63 RAILRD 20 RAILROAD AV ADAMS ST FIRE STATION 490 32 15,680 C - Collector O - AC/AC 54 9.36 RAILRD 30 RAILROAD AV HUNT AV ADAMS ST 530 33 17,490 C - Collector O - AC/AC 94 29.80 RIESL 10 RIESLING WY SYLVANER AV MADRONA ST 470 37 17,390 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 19 0.00 ROSE 10 ROSEBUD LN EL BONITA AV SULPHER SPRINGS 718 28 20,104 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 84 32.16 SCOTT 10 SCOTT ST HILLVIEW PL END (N) 525 32 16,800 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 23 0.00 SCOTT 20 SCOTT ST MADRONA ST HILLVIEW PL 540 32 17,280 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 21 0.00 SIGNOR 10 SIGNORELLI CIR CHILES AV CHILES AV 1,055 35 36,925 R - Residential/Local A - AC 56 12.41 10 SILVERADO TR 175' N/O HOWELL 1,475 44 64,900 A - Arterial O - AC/AC 37
MOUNTAIN RD
SILVER CITY LIMITS (S) 2.82
Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena Section PCI/RSL Listing
Criteria: 5 MTC StreetSaver Agenda Item #15.3. Page 393 of 514 Street ID Section ID Length Width Area Functional Class Surface Type Current
Street Name From To PCI
Remaining
Life
SCRANE 10 SOUTH CRANE AV SE END OF BRIDGE GRAYSON AV 475 24 11,400 C - Collector O - AC/AC 94 29.89 SCRANE 15 SOUTH CRANE AV GRAYSON AV VALLEJO ST 410 31 12,710 C - Collector O - AC/AC 22 0.00 SCRANE 20 SOUTH CRANE AV VALLEJO ST SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 2,015 24 48,360 C - Collector O - AC/AC 16 0.00 SPGMTC 10 SPRING MOUNTAIN CT SPRING MOUNTAIN RD END (S) 1,000 33 33,000 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 47 9.89
SPRING MOUNTAIN
RD
SPGMTN 10 CITY LIMIT (N) 800' S/O CITY LIMIT 800 22 17,600 C - Collector O - AC/AC 47 6.60
SPRING MOUNTAIN
RD
SPGMTN 20 800' S/O CITY LIMIT 1600' S/O CITY LIMIT 800 22 17,600 C - Collector O - AC/AC 20 0.00
SPRING MOUNTAIN
RD
SPGMTN 30 1600' S/O CITY LIMIT 2400' S/O CITY LIMIT 800 22 17,600 C - Collector O - AC/AC 26 0.36
SPRING MOUNTAIN
RD
SPGMTN 40 2400' W/O CITY LIMIT SPRING MOUNTAIN CT 810 27 21,870 C - Collector O - AC/AC 94 29.80
SPRING MOUNTAIN
RD
SPGMTN 50 SPRING MOUNTAIN CT ELMHURST AV 570 36 20,520 C - Collector O - AC/AC 80 24.13
SPRING MOUNTAIN
RD
SPGMTN 60 ELMHURST AV HILLVIEW PL 560 31 17,360 C - Collector O - AC/AC 89 28.08
SPRING MOUNTAIN
RD
SPGMTN 70 HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 540 31 16,740 C - Collector O - AC/AC 73 18.77 SPRING 05 SPRING ST CITY LIMITS 639' W/O SYLVANER AV 1,215 21 25,515 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 37.77 SPRING 10 SPRING ST 639' W/O SYLVANER AV SYLVANER AV (W) 639 18 11,502 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 37.77 SPRING 15 SPRING ST SYLVANER AV (W) CHARDONNAY WY 760 35 26,600 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 93 50.80 SPRING 20 SPRING ST CHARDONNAY WY SYLVANER AV (E) 910 35 31,850 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 93 50.80 SPRING 25 SPRING ST SYLVANER AV (E) VALLEYVIEW ST 580 36 20,880 C - Collector O - AC/AC 92 29.49 SPRING 30 SPRING ST VALLEYVIEW ST HUDSON AV (W) 610 39 23,790 C - Collector O - AC/AC 68 15.95 SPRING 35 SPRING ST HUDSON AV (W) ALLYN AV 370 33 12,210 C - Collector O - AC/AC 47 6.60 SPRING 40 SPRING ST ALLYN AV STOCKTON ST 870 37 32,190 C - Collector O - AC/AC 54 8.88 SPRING 45 SPRING ST STOCKTON ST KEARNEY ST 690 37 25,530 C - Collector O - AC/AC 71 17.63 SPRING 50 SPRING ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 390 37 14,430 C - Collector O - AC/AC 71 17.63 SPRING 55 SPRING ST OAK AV BCR @ MAIN ST 330 29 9,570 C - Collector C - AC/PCC 56 10.21 SPRBRK 10 SPRINGBROOK CT SPRING ST END (N) 470 33 15,510 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 25 0.00 STARR 10 STARR AV HUNT AV HARVEST LN 935 47 43,945 C - Collector O - AC/AC 30 1.20 STARR 20 STARR AV HARVEST LN POPE ST 385 47 18,095 C - Collector A - AC 28 0.59 STOCKT 10 STOCKTON ST HILLVIEW PL END (N) 480 31 14,880 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 22 0.00 STOCKT 20 STOCKTON ST HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 540 29 15,660 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 14 0.00 STOCKT 30 STOCKTON ST MADRONA ST PINE ST 395 25 9,875 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 51 11.30 STOCKT 40 STOCKTON ST PINE ST ADAMS ST 460 25 11,500 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 34 3.40 STOCKT 50 STOCKTON ST ADAMS ST TAINTER ST 447 25 11,175 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 96 38.35 STOCKT 60 STOCKTON ST TAINTER ST BCR @ SPRING ST 410 25 10,250 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 41 6.45 Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena Section PCI/RSL Listing
Criteria: 6 MTC StreetSaver Agenda Item #15.3. Page 394 of 514 Street ID Section ID Length Width Area Functional Class Surface Type Current
Street Name From To PCI
Remaining
Life
STRALL 10 STRALLA CT POPE ST END (S) 90 24 2,160 R - Residential/Local A - AC 48 8.71
SULPHUR SPRINGS
AV
SULSPR 10 END (NW) VALLEJO EXTENSION 576 18 10,368 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 23 0.00
SULPHUR SPRINGS
AV
20 VALLEJO EXTENSION 2401 SULPHER 1,480 18 14,800 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 37
SPRINGS AVE
SULSPR 4.92
SULPHUR SPRINGS
AV
30 2401 SULPHER SPRINGS 930 21 19,530 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 18 AVE
2,410' E/O VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SULSPR 0.00
SULPHUR SPRINGS
AV
40 2,410' E/O VALLEJO 770 21 16,170 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 13
EXTENSION
3,180' E/O VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SULSPR 0.00
SULPHUR SPRINGS
AV
50 3,180' E/O VALLEJO 1,160 18 20,880 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 19
EXTENSION
SULSPR SOUTH CRANE AV 0.00
SULPHUR SPRINGS
AV
SULSPR 60 SOUTH CRANE AV ARROWHEAD DR 1,175 24 28,200 C - Collector O - AC/AC 18 0.00
SULPHUR SPRINGS
AV
70 ARROWHEAD DR 1,035' S/O ARROWHEAD 1,035 24 24,840 C - Collector O - AC/AC 18 DR
SULSPR 0.00
SULPHUR SPRINGS
AV
80 1,035' S/O ARROWHEAD 440 38 16,720 C - Collector O - AC/AC 52 DR
SULSPR MAIN ST 7.91
SYLVAN 10 SYLVANER AV SPRING ST (E) 900' N/O SPRING ST (E) 900 37 33,300 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 16 0.00 SYLVAN 20 SYLVANER AV 900' N/O SPRING ST (E) RIESLING WY 780 37 28,860 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 18 0.00 SYLVAN 30 SYLVANER AV RIESLING WY PINOT WY 840 37 31,080 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 21 0.00 SYLVAN 40 SYLVANER AV PINOT WY SPRING ST (W) 730 37 27,010 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 34 3.49 TAINT 10 TAINTER ST ALLYN AV STOCKTON ST 740 30 22,200 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 78 33.16 TAINT 20 TAINTER ST STOCKTON ST KEARNEY ST 710 29 20,590 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 76 31.05 TAINT 30 TAINTER ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 390 29 11,310 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 78 33.16 30 VALLEJO ST SOUTH CRANE AV 1,270' W/O SOUTH 1,270 15 19,050 C - Collector O - AC/AC 15
CRANE AV
VALLEJ 0.00
VAVIEW 10 VALLEYVIEW ST SPRING ST BIRCH AV 1,043 34 35,462 C - Collector O - AC/AC 67 15.86 VAVIEW 20 VALLEYVIEW ST BIRCHE AV SE END OF BRIDGE 305 34 10,370 C - Collector O - AC/AC 94 29.90 VIDOV 10 VIDOVICH AV MAIN ST END (W) 460 40 18,400 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 20 0.00 VINEYD 10 VINEYARD AV END (N) ROAD WIDENS 1,030 34 35,020 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 59 15.67 VINEYD 20 VINEYARD AV ROAD WIDENS HILLVIEW PL 515 30 15,450 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 67 20.52 VINEYD 30 VINEYARD AV HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 540 30 16,200 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 81 30.07 VINTAG 10 VINTAGE AV MCCORMICK ST MAIN ST 510 38 19,380 C - Collector O - AC/AC 16 0.00 VINTAG 20 VINTAGE AV MCCORMICK ST END (E) 780 38 29,640 C - Collector O - AC/AC 43 4.64 VOELKR 10 VOLKER CT CRINELLA DR END (E) 210 33 6,930 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 94 38.04 VORHEE 10 VORHEES CIR MITCHELL DR (W) MITCHELL DR (E) 1,100 26 28,600 R - Residential/Local O - AC/AC 96 38.35 VORHEE 20 VORHEES CIR MITCHELL DR (E) MITCHELL DR (W) 915 26 23,790 R - Residential/Local A - AC 28 0.81 Total Section Length: 137,672
Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena Section PCI/RSL Listing
Criteria: 7 MTC StreetSaver Agenda Item #15.3. Page 395 of 514 Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena Section PCI/RSL Listing
Total Section Length: 137,672
Total Section Area: 4,136,357
Criteria: 8 MTC StreetSaver Agenda Item #15.3. Page 396 of 514 PTAP-24 – City of St. Helena
2023-24 Pavement Management Program Update
Final Report – September 21, 2023
APPENDIX II
BUDGET ANALYSIS REPORTS
A. Budget Needs Report and Treatment Cost Details- Five Year B. Average PCI by Annual Funding Chart
C. Deferred Maintenance Cost Trend by Annual Funding Chart D. Budget Scenario Cost and Network Summaries
E. Annual Work Program - $1.2 million
Agenda Item #15.3.
A. NEEDS – PROJECTED PCI/COST SUMMARY –
FIVE YEAR
NEEDS - PROJECTED PCI/COST SUMMARY
This report highlights the impact of projected needs funding (and lack thereof) on pavement system condition. The report also provides a cost estimate of the funding needed to bring the streets to an optimal preventive maintenance level.
Finally, an “Untreated PCI” is listed. This value is an accurate portrayal of average street condition.
Year: Year of Projection
PCI Treated: Average Street PCI with suggested treatments applied PCI Untreated: Present average untreated street PCI for year. This value is most accurate reflection of present PCI
Cost: Cost per year to apply suggested treatments
PM Cost: Total cost over the period of analysis spent on preventative maintenance
% PM: Percent of total cost over the period of analysis spent on preventative maintenance
Total Cost: Total cost over the period of analysis to bring streets to optimal maintenance level.
Agenda Item #15.3.
Year PCI Treated PCI Untreated PM Cost Rehab Cost Cost
2023 91 54 $78,414 $14,182,797 $14,261,211
2024 86 52 $66,494 $76,274 $142,767
2025 85 49 $17,178 $179,419 $196,597
2026 83 46 $49,686 $211,928 $261,615
2027 83 44 $162,759 $489,625 $652,385
Total Cost
$15,514,575
PM Total Cost
$374,532
% PM
2.41% $15,140,043
Rehab Total Cost
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost
Summary
Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
ADAMS 10 ADAMS ST HUDSON AV ALLYN AV 74 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $9,816 ADAMS 30 ADAMS ST STOCKTON ST KEARNEY ST 82 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $16,398 ADAMS 40 ADAMS ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 78 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $9,724 ADAMS 75 ADAMS ST COP @ LIBRARY 87 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $7,286 LN
COP BEFORE
RAILROAD AV
ADAMS 80 ADAMS ST COP @ 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $6,746
BUSINESS
CENTER DWY
COP @
LIBRARY LN
ADAMS 90 ADAMS ST END (E) COP @ 91 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $6,297
BUSINESS
CENTER DWY
ALLYN 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $80,434
FABRIC
10 ALLYN AV MADRONA ST PINE ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 ALLYN 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $86,753
FABRIC
20 ALLYN AV PINE ST ADAMS ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
ALLYN 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $104,751
FABRIC
40 ALLYN AV TAINTER ST SPRING ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 ANDREA 2" GRIND & OL W/ $70,927
FABRIC
10 ANDREA AV KEARNEY ST OAK AV 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 ARROWH 10 ARROWHEAD DR BCR @ SULPHUR 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 2" GRIND & OL $88,193
SPRINGS RD
END (S)
BIRCH 2" GRIND & OL W/ $106,020
FABRIC
10 BIRCH ST VALLEYVIEW ST NORTH CRANE 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 AV
CHABLI 2" GRIND & OL W/ $67,962
FABRIC
10 A CHABLIS CIR PINOT WAY 500' NE/O PINT 100 AC Residential/Local 2023
WAY (E)
CHABLI 2" GRIND & OL W/ $27,308
FABRIC
10 B CHABLIS CIR PINOT WAY END 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 CHABLI 2" GRIND & OL W/ $66,602
FABRIC
20 CHABLIS CIR PINOT WY 500' NE/O PINOT 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 WY (E)
CHARDO 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $108,010
FABRIC
10 CHARDONNAY WY SPRING ST PINOT WY 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 CHILES 10 CHILES AV POPE ST SIGNORELLI 72 AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $25,952 CIR
COLUMB 2" GRIND & OL W/ $58,447
FABRIC
10 COLUMBARD CT CHARDONNAY 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 WY
END (W)
CTROAK 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $67,381
FABRIC
10 CHARTER OAK AV CARWASH END (E) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 CTROAK 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $40,725
FABRIC
20 CHARTER OAK AV MAIN ST CARWASH 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 DORIS 10 DORIS AV VINEYARD AV END (W) 83 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SEAL CRACKS $33 DORISC 10 DORIS CT VINEYARD AV END (E) 76 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SEAL CRACKS $85 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
DOWDEL 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $41,152
FABRIC
10 DOWDELL LN MAIN ST FOUNTAIN ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 DOWDEL RECONSTRUCT $477,917
STRUCTURE (AC)
20 DOWDELL LN FOUNTAIN ST MONTESSORI 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 @ COP
DOWDEL 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $37,327
FABRIC
30 DOWDELL LN MONTESSORI @ 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 COP
HOUSE 867
DOWDEL 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $25,842
FABRIC
40 DOWDELL LN HOUSE 867 HOUSE 759 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 DOWDEL 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $18,424
FABRIC
50 DOWDELL LN HOUSE 759 HOUSE 679 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 EDWARD 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $111,264
FABRIC
10 EDWARDS ST HUNT AV POPE ST 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 FOUNT 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $67,285
FABRIC
10 FOUNTAIN ST DOWDELL LN END (N) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 FULTON 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $59,554
FABRIC
10 FULTON LN MAIN ST RAILROAD AV 100 AC/PCC Collector 2023 FULTON 2" GRIND & OL W/ $27,185
FABRIC
20 FULTON LN RAILROAD AV RR TRACKS 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 FULTON 2" GRIND & OL W/ $53,340
FABRIC
30 FULTON LN RR TRACKS 25 MPH SIGN 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 FULTON 40 FULTON LN 25 MPH SIGN END (E)/CITY 66 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $11,220 LIMITS
GRAYSN RECONSTRUCT $513,333
STRUCTURE (AC)
10 GRAYSON AV SOUTH CRANE 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
AV
1120' E/O
SOUTH CRANE
AV
GRAYSN RECONSTRUCT $375,833
STRUCTURE (AC)
20 GRAYSON AV 1120' E/O SOUTH 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
CRANE AV
1940' E/O
SOUTH CRANE
AV
GRAYSN RECONSTRUCT $344,306
STRUCTURE (AC)
30 GRAYSON AV 1940' E/O SOUTH 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
CRANE AV
MAIN ST
HARVES 10 HARVEST LN STARR AV END (W) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 2" GRIND & OL $25,870 HILLVW 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $20,674
FABRIC
05 HILLVIEW PL END (W) SCOTT ST 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 HILLVW 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $50,248
FABRIC
10 HILLVIEW PL SCOTT ST VINEYARD AV 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 HILLVW 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $46,898
FABRIC
20 HILLVIEW PL VINEYARD AV STOCKTON ST 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 HILLVW 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $51,684
FABRIC
30 HILLVIEW PL STOCKTON ST SPRING 100 AC Residential/Local 2023
MOUNTAIN RD
HILLVW 40 HILLVIEW PL SPRING 76 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SEAL CRACKS $326
MOUNTAIN RD
OAK AV
HOWMTN 10 HOWELL MOUNTAIN 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $91,452 RD
SILVERADO
TRAIL
MEADOWWOOD
LN
Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
HOWMTN 20 HOWELL MOUNTAIN 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $98,200 RD
MEADOWWOOD
LN
OAKWOOD LN
HOWMTN 30 HOWELL MOUNTAIN 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $120,596 RD
OAKWOOD LN RIDGEVIEW LN
HUDSON 10 HUDSON AV MADRONA ST ADAMS ST 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 2" GRIND & OL $96,353 HUNT 20 HUNT AV CHURCH ST EDWARDS ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $55,991 HUNT 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $85,818
FABRIC
30 HUNT AV EDWARDS ST JUNE LN 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
KEARN 2" GRIND & OL W/ $93,416
FABRIC
10 KEARNEY ST HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 KEARN 20 KEARNEY ST MADRONA ST PINE ST 67 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $6,521 KEARN 30 KEARNEY ST PINE ST ADAMS ST 64 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $10,040 KIDDRD 2" GRIND & OL W/ $49,942
FABRIC
10 KIDD RANCH RD MCCORKLE AV END (S) 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 LAFATA 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $102,881
FABRIC
10 LA FATA ST DOWDELL LN MILLS LN 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 MADRON 10 MADRONA ST REISLING WY FIR HILL DR 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $99,540 MADRON 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $66,177
FABRIC
20 MADRONA ST FIR HILL DR SPOTSWOOD 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 (ROAD WIDENS)
MARIPO 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $109,757
FABRIC
10 MARIPOSA LN MCCORKLE AV POPE ST 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MCCORK 10 MCCORKLE AV END (W) ALLISON AV 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 2" GRIND & OL $28,863 MCCORK 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $36,753
FABRIC
20 MCCORKLE AV ALLISON AV MARIPOSA LN 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MCCORK 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $105,474
FABRIC
30 MCCORKLE AV MARIPOSA LN END (E) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MCCORM 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $162,015
FABRIC
10 MCCORMICK ST DOWDELL LN VINTAGE AV 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MEADCK 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $180,607
FABRIC
10 MEADOWCREEK CIR STARR AV (N) STARR AV (S) 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 MILLS 10 MILLS LN MAIN ST LA FATA ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $58,288 MILLS 20 MILLS LN LA FATA ST MAILBOX 458 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 2" GRIND & OL $105,261 (COP)
MILLS 30 MILLS LN MAILBOX 458 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 2" GRIND & OL $58,367 (COP)
END (E)
MITCH 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $41,634
FABRIC
10 MITCHELL DR NORTH CRANE 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 AV
VOORHEES CIR
MITCH 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $81,187
FABRIC
20 MITCHELL DR VOORHEES CIR 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 (W)
VOORHEES CIR
(E)
MITCH 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $80,493
FABRIC
30 MITCHELL DR VOORHEES CIR ST JAMES DR 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 3 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
MITCH 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $84,417
FABRIC
40 MITCHELL DR ST JAMES DR OAK AV 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MITCH 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $67,744
FABRIC
50 MITCHELL DR OAK AV BCR @ MAIN ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 NCRANE 10 NORTH CRANE AV SPRING ST MITCHELL DR 87 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SEAL CRACKS $60 NCRANE 20 NORTH CRANE AV MITCHELL DR END (S) 81 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SEAL CRACKS $243 OAK RECONSTRUCT $195,972
STRUCTURE (AC)
20 OAK AV MADRONA ST PINE ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
OAK RECONSTRUCT $278,611
STRUCTURE (AC)
30 OAK AV PINE ST ADAMS ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
OAK 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $86,046
FABRIC
40 OAK AV ADAMS ST TAINTER ST 100 AC Collector 2023
OAK 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $78,867
FABRIC
50 OAK AV TAINTER ST SPRING ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 OAK 60 OAK AV SPRING ST MITCHELL DR 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $79,249 PINE 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $96,333
FABRIC
10 PINE ST HUDSON AV ALLYN AV 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 PINE 2" GRIND & OL W/ $65,243
FABRIC
20 PINE ST ALLYN AV END (E) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 PINE 30 PINE ST STOCKTON ST END (E) 84 AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $9,408 PINE 2" GRIND & OL W/ $41,189
FABRIC
40 PINE ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 100 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2023 PINE 50 PINE ST OAK AV MAIN ST 66 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $6,870 PINE 60 PINE ST MAIN ST FIRE STATION 92 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $3,089 PINOT 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $45,798
FABRIC
10 PINOT WY SYLVANER AV CHABLIS CIR 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 PINOT 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $58,432
FABRIC
20 PINOT WY CHABLIS CIR CHARDONNAY 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 WY
PINOT 2" GRIND & OL W/ $78,156
FABRIC
30 PINOT WY CHARDONNAY 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 WY
END (E)
POPE 2" GRIND, 1" OL, $47,362
FABRIC & 2"
ADDITIONAL OL
10 POPE ST MAIN ST CHURCH ST 100 AC/AC Arterial 2023
POPE 20 POPE ST CHURCH ST EDWARDS ST 100 AC/AC Arterial 2023 2" GRIND & OL $70,348 POPE 70 POPE ST PEPPERTREE 100 AC/AC Arterial 2023 2" GRIND & OL $99,492 CIR
COLLEGE AV
POPE 90 POPE ST BEGIN BRIDGE SILVERADO 87 AC Arterial 2023 MICROSURFACING $6,382 TRAIL
PRATT 10 PRATT AV MAIN ST RR TRACKS 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $217,743 PRATT RECONSTRUCT $205,000
STRUCTURE (AC)
20 PRATT AV RR TRACKS END OF CURB 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 4 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
PRATT RECONSTRUCT $253,333
STRUCTURE (AC)
30 PRATT AV END OF CURB 2000' FROM 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 BRIDGE (35
MPH SIGN
PRATT RECONSTRUCT $693,333
STRUCTURE (AC)
40 PRATT AV 2000' FROM 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
BRIDGE (35 MPH
SIGN
BRIDGE
PRATT RECONSTRUCT $333,333
STRUCTURE (AC)
50 PRATT AV BRIDGE BRIDGE 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
RAILRD 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $93,275
FABRIC
10 RAILROAD AV FIRE STATION FULTON LN 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 RIESL 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $83,221
FABRIC
10 RIESLING WY SYLVANER AV MADRONA ST 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 ROSE 10 ROSEBUD LN EL BONITA AV SULPHER 91 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $12,219
SPRINGS
SCOTT 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $80,397
FABRIC
10 SCOTT ST HILLVIEW PL END (N) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SCOTT 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $82,694
FABRIC
20 SCOTT ST MADRONA ST HILLVIEW PL 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SCRANE RECONSTRUCT $176,528
STRUCTURE (AC)
15 SOUTH CRANE AV GRAYSON AV VALLEJO ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 SCRANE RECONSTRUCT $671,667
STRUCTURE (AC)
20 SOUTH CRANE AV VALLEJO ST SULPHUR 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
SPRINGS AV
SIGNOR 10 SIGNORELLI CIR CHILES AV CHILES AV 68 AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $22,442 SILVER 2" GRIND, 1" OL, $342,672
FABRIC & 2"
ADDITIONAL OL
10 SILVERADO TR 175' N/O HOWELL 100 AC/AC Arterial 2023
MOUNTAIN RD
CITY LIMITS (S)
SPGMTC 2" GRIND & OL W/ $135,923
FABRIC
10 SPRING MOUNTAIN CT SPRING 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023
MOUNTAIN RD
END (S)
SPGMTN 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $88,978
FABRIC
10 SPRING MOUNTAIN RD CITY LIMIT (N) 800' S/O CITY 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 LIMIT
SPGMTN RECONSTRUCT $244,444
STRUCTURE (AC)
20 SPRING MOUNTAIN RD 800' S/O CITY 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 LIMIT
1600' S/O CITY
LIMIT
SPGMTN 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $88,978
FABRIC
30 SPRING MOUNTAIN RD 1600' S/O CITY 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 LIMIT
2400' S/O CITY
LIMIT
SPRBRK 2" GRIND & OL W/ $63,884
FABRIC
10 SPRINGBROOK CT SPRING ST END (N) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SPRING 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $61,728
FABRIC
35 SPRING ST HUDSON AV (W) ALLYN AV 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 STARR 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $222,166
FABRIC
10 STARR AV HUNT AV HARVEST LN 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 STARR 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $91,480
FABRIC
20 STARR AV HARVEST LN POPE ST 100 AC Collector 2023
Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 5 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
STOCKT 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $71,209
FABRIC
10 STOCKTON ST HILLVIEW PL END (N) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 STOCKT 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $74,942
FABRIC
20 STOCKTON ST HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 STOCKT 30 STOCKTON ST MADRONA ST PINE ST 64 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $6,002 STOCKT 2" GRIND & OL W/ $47,367
FABRIC
40 STOCKTON ST PINE ST ADAMS ST 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 STOCKT 2" GRIND & OL W/ $42,219
FABRIC
60 STOCKTON ST TAINTER ST BCR @ SPRING 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 ST
STRALL 2" GRIND & OL W/ $8,897
FABRIC
10 STRALLA CT POPE ST END (S) 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 SULSPR 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $49,617
FABRIC
10 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV END (NW) VALLEJO 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023
EXTENSION
SULSPR 2" GRIND & OL W/ $60,960
FABRIC
20 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV VALLEJO 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023
EXTENSION
2401 SULPHER
SPRINGS AVE
SULSPR 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $93,462
FABRIC
30 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 2401 SULPHER 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023
SPRINGS AVE
2,410' E/O
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SULSPR 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $77,382
FABRIC
40 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 2,410' E/O 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
3,180' E/O
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SULSPR 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $99,922
FABRIC
50 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 3,180' E/O 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SOUTH CRANE
AV
SULSPR RECONSTRUCT $391,667
STRUCTURE (AC)
60 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV SOUTH CRANE 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 AV
ARROWHEAD
DR
SULSPR RECONSTRUCT $345,000
STRUCTURE (AC)
70 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV ARROWHEAD DR 1,035' S/O 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
ARROWHEAD
DR
SULSPR 80 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 1,035' S/O 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $80,014
ARROWHEAD DR
MAIN ST
SYLVAN 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $159,359
FABRIC
10 SYLVANER AV SPRING ST (E) 900' N/O 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023
SPRING ST (E)
SYLVAN 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $138,111
FABRIC
20 SYLVANER AV 900' N/O SPRING 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 ST (E)
RIESLING WY
SYLVAN 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $148,735
FABRIC
30 SYLVANER AV RIESLING WY PINOT WY 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 SYLVAN 2" GRIND & OL W/ $111,251
FABRIC
40 SYLVANER AV PINOT WY SPRING ST (W) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 VALLEJ RECONSTRUCT $264,583
STRUCTURE (AC)
30 VALLEJO ST SOUTH CRANE 100 AC/AC Collector 2023
AV
1,270' W/O
SOUTH CRANE
AV
VAVIEW 10 VALLEYVIEW ST SPRING ST BIRCH AV 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 2" GRIND & OL $169,705 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 6 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
VIDOV 2.5" GRIND & OL W/ $88,054
FABRIC
10 VIDOVICH AV MAIN ST END (W) 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 VINEYD 30 VINEYARD AV HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 88 AC/AC Residential/Local 2023 MICROSURFACING $9,846 VINTAG RECONSTRUCT $269,167
STRUCTURE (AC)
10 VINTAGE AV MCCORMICK ST MAIN ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 VINTAG 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $149,847
FABRIC
20 VINTAGE AV MCCORMICK ST END (E) 100 AC/AC Collector 2023 VORHEE 2" GRIND & OL W/ $97,988
FABRIC
20 VORHEES CIR MITCHELL DR (E) MITCHELL DR 100 AC Residential/Local 2023 (W)
ADAMS 20 ADAMS ST ALLYN AV STOCKTON ST 78 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $15,839 DORIS 10 DORIS AV VINEYARD AV END (W) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $2,604 DORISC 10 DORIS CT VINEYARD AV END (E) 82 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $4,244 HILLVW 40 HILLVIEW PL SPRING 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $16,707
MOUNTAIN RD
OAK AV
KEARN 40 KEARNEY ST TAINTER ST SPRING ST 78 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $5,973 NCRANE 10 NORTH CRANE AV SPRING ST MITCHELL DR 92 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $13,689 NCRANE 20 NORTH CRANE AV MITCHELL DR END (S) 87 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $16,015 OAK 10 OAK AV HILLVIEW pL MADRONA ST 78 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $12,987 OLIVE 10 OLIVE AV HUDSON ST VALLEYVIEW ST 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $13,236 QUAIL 10 QUAIL CT ELMHURST AV END (N) 70 AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $9,266 VINEYD 10 VINEYARD AV END (N) ROAD WIDENS 69 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $22,349 VINEYD 20 VINEYARD AV ROAD WIDENS HILLVIEW PL 75 AC/AC Residential/Local 2024 MICROSURFACING $9,860 ADAMS 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $64,154
FABRIC
70 ADAMS ST COP BEFORE 100 AC/AC Collector 2026
RAILROAD AV
60' E/O MAIN ST
CHURCH 10 CHURCH ST HUNT AV POPE ST 75 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 SEAL CRACKS $287 ELBONI 10 EL BONITA AV LA QUINTA WY COP (CHANGE 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 MICROSURFACING $3,483
OF PAVEMENT)
ELBONI 20 EL BONITA AV COP (CHANGE 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 MICROSURFACING $2,508
OF PAVEMENT)
DAHLIA ST
ELBONI 30 EL BONITA AV DAHLIA ST BCR @ MAIN ST 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 MICROSURFACING $24,783 GROVE 10 GROVE CT HUNT AV END (N) 87 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 SEAL CRACKS $41 HUDSON 20 HUDSON AV ADAMS ST SPRING ST 76 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 SEAL CRACKS $401 HUDSON 30 HUDSON AV SPRING ST BIRCH ST 73 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 SEAL CRACKS $578 KENNED 10 KENNEDY CT LA QUINTA WY END (W) 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 MICROSURFACING $9,055 LAQUIN 10 LA QUINTA WY END (N) END (S) 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 MICROSURFACING $8,359 LIBRAR 10 LIBRARY LN ADAMS ST END (N) 100 AC Residential/Local 2026 2" GRIND & OL $70,208 MONVIS 10 MONTE VISTA HUNT AV END (N) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 SEAL CRACKS $3 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 7 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
PAULSN 10 PAULSON CT POPE ST END (N) 77 AC Residential/Local 2026 SEAL CRACKS $203 RAILRD 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $91,766
FABRIC
20 RAILROAD AV ADAMS ST FIRE STATION 100 AC/AC Collector 2026 SPRING 05 SPRING ST CITY LIMITS 639' W/O 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 SEAL CRACKS $5
SYLVANER AV
SPRING 10 SPRING ST 639' W/O 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2026 SEAL CRACKS $2
SYLVANER AV
SYLVANER AV
(W)
SPRING 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $188,390
FABRIC
40 SPRING ST ALLYN AV STOCKTON ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2026 SPRING 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $56,008
FABRIC
55 SPRING ST OAK AV BCR @ MAIN ST 100 AC/PCC Collector 2026 ALLYN 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $77,305
FABRIC
30 ALLYN AV ADAMS ST TAINTER ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2027 CHRIST 10 CHRISTINE CT PARK ST END (E) 88 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 SEAL CRACKS $16 CHURCH 10 CHURCH ST HUNT AV POPE ST 82 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $13,926 CRINEL 20 CRINELLA DR PARK ST PUMP STATION 88 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 SEAL CRACKS $59 CRINEL 30 CRINELLA DR PUMP STATION PARK ST 88 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 SEAL CRACKS $55 DAHLIA 10 DAHLIA ST MAGNOLIA AVE EL BONITA AV 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $5,109 (N)
GROVE 10 GROVE CT HUNT AV END (N) 92 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $10,549 HENRY 10 HENRY CT PARK ST END (E) 88 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 SEAL CRACKS $10 HOWMTN 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $326,487
FABRIC
40 HOWELL MOUNTAIN 100 AC Collector 2027
RD
RIDGEVIEW LN CITY LIMITS
HUDSON 20 HUDSON AV ADAMS ST SPRING ST 83 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $20,567 HUDSON 30 HUDSON AV SPRING ST BIRCH ST 80 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $27,127 MONEY 10 MONEY WY SPRING ST ADAMS ST 77 AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $12,116 MONVIS 10 MONTE VISTA HUNT AV END (N) 93 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $9,142 PARK 20 PARK ST CHRISTINE CT CRINELLA DR 88 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 SEAL CRACKS $36 PAULSN 10 PAULSON CT POPE ST END (N) 84 AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $10,730 SPRING 05 SPRING ST CITY LIMITS 639' W/O 93 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $18,849
SYLVANER AV
SPRING 10 SPRING ST 639' W/O 93 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $8,497
SYLVANER AV
SYLVANER AV
(W)
SPRING 15 SPRING ST SYLVANER AV 95 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $19,651 (W)
CHARDONNAY
WY
SPRING 20 SPRING ST CHARDONNAY 95 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 MICROSURFACING $23,529 WY
SYLVANER AV
(E)
VOELKR 10 VOLKER CT CRINELLA DR END (E) 88 AC/AC Residential/Local 2027 SEAL CRACKS $15 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 8 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
ADAMS RECONSTRUCT $31,907
STRUCTURE (AC)
60 ADAMS ST 60' E/O MAIN ST MAIN ST 100 PCC Collector 2028 BROWN 10 BROWN ST ALLISON AV END (W) 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $12,543 CHRIST 10 CHRISTINE CT PARK ST END (E) 92 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $5,376 CRINEL 20 CRINELLA DR PARK ST PUMP STATION 92 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $20,440 CRINEL 30 CRINELLA DR PUMP STATION PARK ST 92 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $18,942 ELBONICT 10 EL BONITA CT EL BONITA AVE END 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $6,448 HENRY 10 HENRY CT PARK ST END (E) 92 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $3,692 LAFATA 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $218,217
FABRIC
20 LA FATA ST DOWDELL LN VINTAGE AV 100 AC/AC Collector 2028 MAGNO 10 MAGNOLIA AVE ROSEBUD LN E END 94 AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $3,650 MAGNO 20 MAGNOLIA AVE ROSEBUD LN DAHLIA ST 94 AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $10,871 PARK 10 PARK ST PRATT AV CHRISTINE CT 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $19,229 PARK 20 PARK ST CHRISTINE CT CRINELLA DR 92 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $12,772 VOELKR 10 VOLKER CT CRINELLA DR END (E) 92 AC/AC Residential/Local 2028 MICROSURFACING $5,376 CRINEL 10 CRINELLA DR MAIN ST PARK ST 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2029 MICROSURFACING $10,523 JUNELN 2" GRIND & OL W/ $47,331
FABRIC
10 JUNE LN HUNT AV CHILES AV 100 AC Residential/Local 2029 MADRON 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $96,204
FABRIC
40 MADRONA ST SCOTT ST VINEYARD AV 100 AC/AC Collector 2029 MADRON 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $196,473
FABRIC
50 MADRONA ST VINEYARD AV SPRING 100 AC/AC Collector 2029
MOUNTAIN RD
POPE 90 POPE ST BEGIN BRIDGE SILVERADO 75 AC Arterial 2029 SEAL CRACKS $183 TRAIL
ADAMS 30 ADAMS ST STOCKTON ST KEARNEY ST 75 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $491 ADAMS 75 ADAMS ST COP @ LIBRARY 79 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $189 LN
COP BEFORE
RAILROAD AV
ADAMS 80 ADAMS ST COP @ 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $8
BUSINESS
CENTER DWY
COP @
LIBRARY LN
ADAMS 90 ADAMS ST END (E) COP @ 86 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $72
BUSINESS
CENTER DWY
ANDREA 10 ANDREA AV KEARNEY ST OAK AV 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $169 ARROWH 10 ARROWHEAD DR BCR @ SULPHUR 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $242
SPRINGS RD
END (S)
BIRCH 10 BIRCH ST VALLEYVIEW ST NORTH CRANE 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $252 AV
Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 9 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
CHABLI 10 A CHABLIS CIR PINOT WAY 500' NE/O PINT 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $162
WAY (E)
CHABLI 10 B CHABLIS CIR PINOT WAY END 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $65 CHABLI 20 CHABLIS CIR PINOT WY 500' NE/O PINOT 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $158 WY (E)
CHARDO 10 CHARDONNAY WY SPRING ST PINOT WY 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $221 COLUMB 10 COLUMBARD CT CHARDONNAY 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $139 WY
END (W)
CTROAK 10 CHARTER OAK AV CARWASH END (E) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $138 CTROAK 20 CHARTER OAK AV MAIN ST CARWASH 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $83 DOWDEL 30 DOWDELL LN MONTESSORI @ 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $76 COP
HOUSE 867
DOWDEL 40 DOWDELL LN HOUSE 867 HOUSE 759 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $53 DOWDEL 50 DOWDELL LN HOUSE 759 HOUSE 679 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $38 EDWARD 10 EDWARDS ST HUNT AV POPE ST 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $228 FOUNT 10 FOUNTAIN ST DOWDELL LN END (N) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $138 FULTON 20 FULTON LN RAILROAD AV RR TRACKS 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $65 FULTON 30 FULTON LN RR TRACKS 25 MPH SIGN 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $127 HARVES 10 HARVEST LN STARR AV END (W) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $71 HILLVW 05 HILLVIEW PL END (W) SCOTT ST 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $42 HILLVW 10 HILLVIEW PL SCOTT ST VINEYARD AV 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $103 HILLVW 20 HILLVIEW PL VINEYARD AV STOCKTON ST 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $96 HILLVW 30 HILLVIEW PL STOCKTON ST SPRING 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $106
MOUNTAIN RD
HUDSON 10 HUDSON AV MADRONA ST ADAMS ST 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $265 KEARN 10 KEARNEY ST HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $222 KIDDRD 10 KIDD RANCH RD MCCORKLE AV END (S) 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $119 MADRON 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $187,801
FABRIC
30 MADRONA ST HUDSON AV SCOTT ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2030 MARIPO 10 MARIPOSA LN MCCORKLE AV POPE ST 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $225 MCCORK 10 MCCORKLE AV END (W) ALLISON AV 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $79 MCCORK 20 MCCORKLE AV ALLISON AV MARIPOSA LN 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $75 MCCORK 30 MCCORKLE AV MARIPOSA LN END (E) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $216 MCCORM 10 MCCORMICK ST DOWDELL LN VINTAGE AV 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $332 MEADCK 10 MEADOWCREEK CIR STARR AV (N) STARR AV (S) 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $370 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 10 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
MILLS 20 MILLS LN LA FATA ST MAILBOX 458 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $289 (COP)
MILLS 30 MILLS LN MAILBOX 458 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $160 (COP)
END (E)
MITCH 10 MITCHELL DR NORTH CRANE 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $85 AV
VOORHEES CIR
MITCH 20 MITCHELL DR VOORHEES CIR 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $166 (W)
VOORHEES CIR
(E)
MITCH 30 MITCHELL DR VOORHEES CIR ST JAMES DR 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $165 MITCH 40 MITCHELL DR ST JAMES DR OAK AV 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $173 PINE 10 PINE ST HUDSON AV ALLYN AV 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $197 PINE 20 PINE ST ALLYN AV END (E) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $155 PINE 30 PINE ST STOCKTON ST END (E) 74 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $299 PINE 40 PINE ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 84 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $98 PINE 60 PINE ST MAIN ST FIRE STATION 85 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $42 PINOT 10 PINOT WY SYLVANER AV CHABLIS CIR 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $94 PINOT 20 PINOT WY CHABLIS CIR CHARDONNAY 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $120 WY
PINOT 30 PINOT WY CHARDONNAY 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $186 WY
END (E)
POPE 90 POPE ST BEGIN BRIDGE SILVERADO 82 AC Arterial 2030 MICROSURFACING $8,980 TRAIL
RIESL 10 RIESLING WY SYLVANER AV MADRONA ST 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $170 ROSE 10 ROSEBUD LN EL BONITA AV SULPHER 83 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $206
SPRINGS
SCOTT 10 SCOTT ST HILLVIEW PL END (N) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $165 SCOTT 20 SCOTT ST MADRONA ST HILLVIEW PL 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $169 SPGMTC 10 SPRING MOUNTAIN CT SPRING 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $323
MOUNTAIN RD
END (S)
SPRBRK 10 SPRINGBROOK CT SPRING ST END (N) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $152 STOCKT 10 STOCKTON ST HILLVIEW PL END (N) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $146 STOCKT 20 STOCKTON ST HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $153 STOCKT 40 STOCKTON ST PINE ST ADAMS ST 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $113 STOCKT 50 STOCKTON ST ADAMS ST TAINTER ST 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $100 STOCKT 60 STOCKTON ST TAINTER ST BCR @ SPRING 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $100 ST
STRALL 10 STRALLA CT POPE ST END (S) 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $21 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 11 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
SULSPR 10 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV END (NW) VALLEJO 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $102
EXTENSION
SULSPR 20 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV VALLEJO 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $145
EXTENSION
2401 SULPHER
SPRINGS AVE
SULSPR 30 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 2401 SULPHER 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $191
SPRINGS AVE
2,410' E/O
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SULSPR 40 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 2,410' E/O 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $158
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
3,180' E/O
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SULSPR 50 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 3,180' E/O 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $204
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SOUTH CRANE
AV
SYLVAN 10 SYLVANER AV SPRING ST (E) 900' N/O 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $326
SPRING ST (E)
SYLVAN 20 SYLVANER AV 900' N/O SPRING 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $283 ST (E)
RIESLING WY
SYLVAN 30 SYLVANER AV RIESLING WY PINOT WY 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $304 SYLVAN 40 SYLVANER AV PINOT WY SPRING ST (W) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $265 VIDOV 10 VIDOVICH AV MAIN ST END (W) 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $180 VINEYD 30 VINEYARD AV HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 83 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $173 VORHEE 10 VORHEES CIR MITCHELL DR 84 AC/AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $255 (W)
MITCHELL DR
(E)
VORHEE 20 VORHEES CIR MITCHELL DR (E) MITCHELL DR 84 AC Residential/Local 2030 SEAL CRACKS $233 (W)
ADAMS 10 ADAMS ST HUDSON AV ALLYN AV 74 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,502 ADAMS 30 ADAMS ST STOCKTON ST KEARNEY ST 82 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $24,227 ADAMS 40 ADAMS ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 76 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,367 ADAMS 75 ADAMS ST COP @ LIBRARY 85 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $10,765 LN
COP BEFORE
RAILROAD AV
ADAMS 80 ADAMS ST COP @ 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $9,967
BUSINESS
CENTER DWY
COP @
LIBRARY LN
ADAMS 90 ADAMS ST END (E) COP @ 91 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $9,303
BUSINESS
CENTER DWY
ANDREA 10 ANDREA AV KEARNEY ST OAK AV 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $15,463 ARROWH 10 ARROWHEAD DR BCR @ SULPHUR 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $22,225
SPRINGS RD
END (S)
BIRCH 10 BIRCH ST VALLEYVIEW ST NORTH CRANE 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $23,114 AV
Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 12 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
CHABLI 10 A CHABLIS CIR PINOT WAY 500' NE/O PINT 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,816
WAY (E)
CHABLI 10 B CHABLIS CIR PINOT WAY END 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $5,954 CHABLI 20 CHABLIS CIR PINOT WY 500' NE/O PINOT 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,520 WY (E)
CHARDO 10 CHARDONNAY WY SPRING ST PINOT WY 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $20,267 CHILES 10 CHILES AV POPE ST SIGNORELLI 69 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $38,343 CIR
CHILES 20 CHILES AV SIGNORELLI CIR END (E) 71 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $16,657 COLUMB 10 COLUMBARD CT CHARDONNAY 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $12,742 WY
END (W)
CTROAK 10 CHARTER OAK AV CARWASH END (E) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $12,643 CTROAK 20 CHARTER OAK AV MAIN ST CARWASH 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $7,642 DORIS 10 DORIS AV VINEYARD AV END (W) 83 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 SEAL CRACKS $48 DOWDEL 30 DOWDELL LN MONTESSORI @ 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $7,004 COP
HOUSE 867
DOWDEL 40 DOWDELL LN HOUSE 867 HOUSE 759 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $4,849 DOWDEL 50 DOWDELL LN HOUSE 759 HOUSE 679 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $3,457 EDWARD 10 EDWARDS ST HUNT AV POPE ST 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $20,878 FOUNT 10 FOUNTAIN ST DOWDELL LN END (N) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $12,625 FULTON 20 FULTON LN RAILROAD AV RR TRACKS 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $5,927 FULTON 30 FULTON LN RR TRACKS 25 MPH SIGN 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $11,629 FULTON 2" GRIND & OL W/ $112,338
FABRIC
40 FULTON LN 25 MPH SIGN END (E)/CITY 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 LIMITS
HARVES 10 HARVEST LN STARR AV END (W) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $6,519 HILLVW 05 HILLVIEW PL END (W) SCOTT ST 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $3,879 HILLVW 10 HILLVIEW PL SCOTT ST VINEYARD AV 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $9,429 HILLVW 20 HILLVIEW PL VINEYARD AV STOCKTON ST 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $8,800 HILLVW 30 HILLVIEW PL STOCKTON ST SPRING 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $9,698
MOUNTAIN RD
HILLVW 40 HILLVIEW PL SPRING 78 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 SEAL CRACKS $442
MOUNTAIN RD
OAK AV
HUDSON 10 HUDSON AV MADRONA ST ADAMS ST 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $24,281 KEARN 10 KEARNEY ST HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $20,366 KEARN 20 KEARNEY ST MADRONA ST PINE ST 67 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $9,635 KEARN 30 KEARNEY ST PINE ST ADAMS ST 64 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,834 KIDDRD 10 KIDD RANCH RD MCCORKLE AV END (S) 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $10,888 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 13 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
MADRON 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $78,428
FABRIC
70 MADRONA ST OAK AV MAIN ST 100 AC/AC Collector 2031
MARIPO 10 MARIPOSA LN MCCORKLE AV POPE ST 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $20,595 MCCORK 10 MCCORKLE AV END (W) ALLISON AV 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $7,274 MCCORK 20 MCCORKLE AV ALLISON AV MARIPOSA LN 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $6,896 MCCORK 30 MCCORKLE AV MARIPOSA LN END (E) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $19,791 MCCORM 10 MCCORMICK ST DOWDELL LN VINTAGE AV 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $30,401 MEADCK 10 MEADOWCREEK CIR STARR AV (N) STARR AV (S) 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $33,889 MILLS 20 MILLS LN LA FATA ST MAILBOX 458 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $26,526 (COP)
MILLS 30 MILLS LN MAILBOX 458 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,709 (COP)
END (E)
MITCH 10 MITCHELL DR NORTH CRANE 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $7,812 AV
VOORHEES CIR
MITCH 20 MITCHELL DR VOORHEES CIR 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $15,234 (W)
VOORHEES CIR
(E)
MITCH 30 MITCHELL DR VOORHEES CIR ST JAMES DR 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $15,104 MITCH 40 MITCHELL DR ST JAMES DR OAK AV 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $15,840 NCRANE 10 NORTH CRANE AV SPRING ST MITCHELL DR 83 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 SEAL CRACKS $257 NCRANE 20 NORTH CRANE AV MITCHELL DR END (S) 81 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 SEAL CRACKS $353 PINE 10 PINE ST HUDSON AV ALLYN AV 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $18,076 PINE 20 PINE ST ALLYN AV END (E) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,224 PINE 30 PINE ST STOCKTON ST END (E) 81 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $13,900 PINE 40 PINE ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 89 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $8,980 PINE 50 PINE ST OAK AV MAIN ST 65 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $10,151 PINE 60 PINE ST MAIN ST FIRE STATION 90 AC/PCC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $4,563 PINOT 10 PINOT WY SYLVANER AV CHABLIS CIR 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $8,594 PINOT 20 PINOT WY CHABLIS CIR CHARDONNAY 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $10,964 WY
PINOT 30 PINOT WY CHARDONNAY 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $17,039 WY
END (E)
RIESL 10 RIESLING WY SYLVANER AV MADRONA ST 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $15,616 ROSE 10 ROSEBUD LN EL BONITA AV SULPHER 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $18,053
SPRINGS
SCOTT 10 SCOTT ST HILLVIEW PL END (N) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $15,086 SCOTT 20 SCOTT ST MADRONA ST HILLVIEW PL 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $15,517 SIGNOR 10 SIGNORELLI CIR CHILES AV CHILES AV 66 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $33,157 Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 14 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
SPGMTC 10 SPRING MOUNTAIN CT SPRING 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $29,633
MOUNTAIN RD
END (S)
SPRBRK 10 SPRINGBROOK CT SPRING ST END (N) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $13,927 SPRING 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $177,696
FABRIC
30 SPRING ST VALLEYVIEW ST HUDSON AV (W) 100 AC/AC Collector 2031 STOCKT 10 STOCKTON ST HILLVIEW PL END (N) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $13,362 STOCKT 20 STOCKTON ST HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,062 STOCKT 2" GRIND & OL W/ $60,094
FABRIC
30 STOCKTON ST MADRONA ST PINE ST 100 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 STOCKT 40 STOCKTON ST PINE ST ADAMS ST 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $10,327 STOCKT 50 STOCKTON ST ADAMS ST TAINTER ST 90 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $10,035 STOCKT 60 STOCKTON ST TAINTER ST BCR @ SPRING 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $9,204 ST
STRALL 10 STRALLA CT POPE ST END (S) 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $1,940 SULSPR 10 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV END (NW) VALLEJO 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $9,310
EXTENSION
SULSPR 20 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV VALLEJO 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $13,290
EXTENSION
2401 SULPHER
SPRINGS AVE
SULSPR 30 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 2401 SULPHER 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $17,537
SPRINGS AVE
2,410' E/O
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SULSPR 40 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 2,410' E/O 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,520
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
3,180' E/O
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SULSPR 50 SULPHUR SPRINGS AV 3,180' E/O 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $18,750
VALLEJO
EXTENSION
SOUTH CRANE
AV
SYLVAN 10 SYLVANER AV SPRING ST (E) 900' N/O 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $29,902
SPRING ST (E)
SYLVAN 20 SYLVANER AV 900' N/O SPRING 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $25,915 ST (E)
RIESLING WY
SYLVAN 30 SYLVANER AV RIESLING WY PINOT WY 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $27,909 SYLVAN 40 SYLVANER AV PINOT WY SPRING ST (W) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $24,254 TAINT 10 TAINTER ST ALLYN AV STOCKTON ST 76 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $19,935 TAINT 20 TAINTER ST STOCKTON ST KEARNEY ST 75 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $18,489 TAINT 30 TAINTER ST KEARNEY ST OAK AV 77 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $10,156 VIDOV 10 VIDOVICH AV MAIN ST END (W) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $16,523 VINEYD 30 VINEYARD AV HILLVIEW PL MADRONA ST 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $14,547 VORHEE 10 VORHEES CIR MITCHELL DR 90 AC/AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $25,682 (W)
MITCHELL DR
(E)
Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 15 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
St ID Surface Functional Class Year Treatment Cost
Treated
Sec ID Street Name Beg Loc End Loc PCI
VORHEE 20 VORHEES CIR MITCHELL DR (E) MITCHELL DR 89 AC Residential/Local 2031 MICROSURFACING $21,363 (W)
ADAMS 20 ADAMS ST ALLYN AV STOCKTON ST 77 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $23,402 DORIS 10 DORIS AV VINEYARD AV END (W) 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $3,847 DORISC 10 DORIS CT VINEYARD AV END (E) 77 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $6,270 HILLVW 40 HILLVIEW PL SPRING 85 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $24,684
MOUNTAIN RD
OAK AV
HOWMTN 2" GRIND, 2.5" OL W/ $124,230
FABRIC
50 HOWELL MOUNTAIN 100 AC/AC Collector 2032
RD
CITY LIMITS (N) CITY LIMITS (S)
KEARN 40 KEARNEY ST TAINTER ST SPRING ST 76 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $8,825 NCRANE 10 NORTH CRANE AV SPRING ST MITCHELL DR 89 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $20,224 NCRANE 20 NORTH CRANE AV MITCHELL DR END (S) 87 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $23,661 OAK 10 OAK AV HILLVIEW pL MADRONA ST 77 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $19,187 OLIVE 10 OLIVE AV HUDSON ST VALLEYVIEW ST 94 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $19,555 POPE 2" GRIND, 1" OL, $227,301
FABRIC & 2"
ADDITIONAL OL
50 POPE ST MARIPOSA LN STARR AV 100 AC/AC Arterial 2032 QUAIL 10 QUAIL CT ELMHURST AV END (N) 69 AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $13,690 VINEYD 10 VINEYARD AV END (N) ROAD WIDENS 67 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $33,019 VINEYD 20 VINEYARD AV ROAD WIDENS HILLVIEW PL 75 AC/AC Residential/Local 2032 MICROSURFACING $14,567 Assumptions:
• It is assumed that the costs in the Decision Tree are current at the beginning of the analysis for the starting year.
Because of this consideration, treatment costs reported at the starting year (January 1st) for the budget needs analysis are not affected by inflation.
• The inflation rate percentage is cumulative through the year, and consequently the treatment costs projected at the beginning of the next year of analysis (January 1st) are affected by the annual inflation rate.
Needs - Treatment / Cost Details
Printed:
9/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: 16 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
B. AVERAGE PCI BY ANNUAL FUNDING CHART
AVERAGE PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) BY ANNUAL
FUNDING LEVEL
This graph compares 4 different annual budget scenarios and their impact over a five year budget analysis period.
Agenda Item #15.3.
44 53
62 78
58 40
45 50
55 60
65 70
75 80
85 2023 Prior to
Treatment
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
PCI Chart
No Funds ($0) Maintain PCI of 53 ($750 thousand)
Expected Annual Budget ($1.2 million) Budget Needs Average ($3.1 million) 5 Point Increase in PCI (1.05 million) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Years Agenda Item #15.3.
C. DEFERRED MAINTENANCE COST TREND BY
ANNUAL FUNDING CHART
DEFERRED MAINTENANCE COST TREND VS. ANNUAL
FUNDING LEVEL
This graph compares 4 different annual budget scenarios and their impact on deferred maintenance costs (maintenance backlog) over each year of the five-year budget analysis period.
Deferred maintenance is the amount of necessary rehabilitation not performed each year due to budget shortfalls
Agenda Item #15.3.
$21,703,036
$17,766,271
$12,863,377
$14,261,211
$5,416,485
$16,374,708
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
2023 Prior to
Treatment
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Deferred Maintenance Chart
No Funds ($0) Maintain PCI of 53 ($750 thousand)
Expected Annual Budget ($1.2 million) Budget Needs Average ($3.1 million) 5 Point Increase in PCI (1.05 million) - Backlog
Years Agenda Item #15.3.
D. BUDGET SCENARIO COST AND NETWORK
SUMMARIES
SCENARIOS – COST SUMMARY REPORT
A Cost Summary report is provided in this section for each annual budget level analyzed. This specific report indicates the distribution of pavement funding between various condition levels of streets. The top portion of this report shows the interest and inflation assumptions.
The central part of the report lists the analysis year, percentage of that budget that is assigned to preventive maintenance, annual budget, activities distribution of the budget between rehabilitation (by condition category within rehabilitation, preventative maintenance, stop gap, and deferred maintenance costs. Condition Category refers to the MTC defined pavement conditions –Excellent (I), Very Good (II), Good (III), Poor (IV), and Very Poor (V). “Stop Gap” is a factored cost applied for emergency repairs (i.e. pothole repair) needed to minimally maintain a section where a section’s suggested rehabilitation maintenance is deferred. “Funded Stop Gap” refers to the budget amount allocated for stop gap and “Unmet Stop Gap” refers to any deferred stop gap costs. “Deferred” refers to the dollar cost of backlogged rehabilitation. “Surplus PM” values appear if the budget percentage split between rehabilitation and preventive maintenance is too heavily weighted to preventive maintenance. In such a case, the percentage of funding to rehabilitation would be increased.
The bottom part of the report shows a summary of the total costs spent on rehabilitation, preventative maintenance, and stop gap (funded and unmet) according to functional class.
SCENARIOS – NETWORK CONDITION SUMMARY REPORT
This report details present and projected network condition trends based on the annual budget set for an individual scenario. Perhaps the most important piece of information from this report is found on the first page of the report. The table under “Project Network Average PCI by Year” shows what the overall network condition trend is when the suggested treatments are applied in comparison to when the treatments are not applied.
THESE REPORTS ARE PROVIDED FOR EACH OF THE
COMPARISON SCENARIOS
Agenda Item #15.3.
City of St. Helena Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 8/7/2023
Scenario: PTAP-24 No Funds
2023 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0 $14,261,211 $0
$115,723
0%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0 $15,667,692 $0
$1,936
0%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0 $17,621,983 $0
$789
0%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0 $19,060,525 $0
$1,494
0%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0 $21,703,036 $0
$2,821
0%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $0 $0 $0 $2,154
Collector $0 $0 $0 $51,661
Residential/Local $0 $0 $0 $68,947
Grand Total: $0 $0 $0 $122,762
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:
Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2023 $0 0%
2024 $0 0%
2025 $0 0%
2026 $0 0%
2027 $0 0%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2023 54 54 0 0
2024 52 52 0 0
2025 49 49 0 0
2026 46 46 0 0
2027 44 44 0 0
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2023, prior to applying treatments.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 1.9% 10.1% 21.4% 0.0% 33.5%
II / III 1.5% 12.7% 8.9% 0.0% 23.1%
IV 1.8% 8.0% 8.1% 0.0% 17.9%
V 0.0% 10.5% 15.1% 0.0% 25.6%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2023 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 1.9% 10.1% 21.4% 0.0% 33.5%
II / III 1.5% 12.7% 8.9% 0.0% 23.1%
IV 1.8% 8.0% 8.1% 0.0% 17.9%
V 0.0% 10.5% 15.1% 0.0% 25.6%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2027 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 1.5% 7.4% 17.4% 0.0% 26.3%
II / III 1.9% 9.8% 9.8% 0.0% 21.4%
IV 0.0% 9.5% 7.7% 0.0% 17.1%
V 1.8% 14.7% 18.6% 0.0% 35.1%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Scenario: PTAP-24 No Funds
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:
1 Agenda Item #15.3.
City of St. Helena Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 8/7/2023
Scenario: PTAP-24 - Maintain PCI of 53 ($750K)
2023 $750,000
$722,846
$45,492
$169,839
$507,515
$0
$0 $0 $13,538,364 $27,154
$84,497
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $750,000
$722,621
$53,925
$0
$668,696
$0
$26,267 $0 $14,159,815 $654
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $750,000
$727,132
$0
$28,521
$587,444
$111,167
$19,431 $0 $15,292,149 $789
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $750,000
$731,034
$18,983
$0
$682,136
$29,915
$16,473 $0 $15,866,692 $246
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $750,000
$712,400
$31,456
$0
$642,378
$38,566
$36,132 $0 $17,766,271 $299
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $169,839 $6,701 $1,642 $0
Collector $1,947,505 $0 $8,616 $39,446
Residential/Local $1,498,692 $91,602 $18,884 $45,051
Grand Total: $3,616,036 $98,303 $29,141 $84,497
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:
Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2023 $750,000 2%
2024 $750,000 2%
2025 $750,000 2%
2026 $750,000 2%
2027 $750,000 2%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2023 54 57 1.25 2.49
2024 52 55 1.50 3.01
2025 49 55 1.11 2.22
2026 46 54 2.31 4.62
2027 44 53 1.86 3.73
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2023, prior to applying treatments.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 1.9% 10.1% 21.4% 0.0% 33.5%
II / III 1.5% 12.7% 8.9% 0.0% 23.1%
IV 1.8% 8.0% 8.1% 0.0% 17.9%
V 0.0% 10.5% 15.1% 0.0% 25.6%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2023 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 2.8% 11.4% 24.7% 0.0% 38.9%
II / III 0.7% 12.7% 7.0% 0.0% 20.4%
IV 1.8% 6.7% 6.6% 0.0% 15.2%
V 0.0% 10.5% 15.1% 0.0% 25.6%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2027 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 2.4% 15.8% 28.4% 0.0% 46.6%
II / III 1.1% 9.8% 5.7% 0.0% 16.5%
IV 0.0% 1.1% 1.6% 0.0% 2.6%
V 1.8% 14.7% 17.8% 0.0% 34.3%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Scenario: PTAP-24 - Maintain PCI of 53 ($750K)
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:
1 Agenda Item #15.3.
City of St. Helena Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 8/7/2023
Scenario: PTAP-24 - Five Point Increase 58
($1.05M)
2023 $1,050,000
$1,012,681
$45,492
$169,839
$797,350
$0
$0 $0 $13,248,529 $37,319
$73,058
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $1,050,000
$1,024,863
$53,925
$0
$724,671
$246,267
$23,663 $0 $13,555,850 $654
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $1,050,000
$1,007,988
$0
$28,521
$388,546
$590,920
$40,243 $0 $14,356,318 $0
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $1,050,000
$1,021,869
$0
$0
$738,144
$283,725
$26,806 $0 $14,771,291 $0
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $1,050,000
$981,208
$12,116
$70,946
$642,378
$255,768
$67,525 $0 $16,374,708 $299
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $169,839 $6,701 $1,642 $0
Collector $2,156,131 $0 $6,603 $39,150
Residential/Local $2,722,639 $151,536 $30,027 $33,908
Grand Total: $5,048,609 $158,237 $38,271 $73,058
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:
Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2023 $1,050,000 2%
2024 $1,050,000 2%
2025 $1,050,000 2%
2026 $1,050,000 2%
2027 $1,050,000 2%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2023 54 57 1.55 3.09
2024 52 57 2.02 4.05
2025 49 58 1.59 3.17
2026 46 58 2.56 5.12
2027 44 58 2.44 4.65
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2023, prior to applying treatments.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 1.9% 10.1% 21.4% 0.0% 33.5%
II / III 1.5% 12.7% 8.9% 0.0% 23.1%
IV 1.8% 8.0% 8.1% 0.0% 17.9%
V 0.0% 10.5% 15.1% 0.0% 25.6%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2023 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 2.8% 12.8% 24.7% 0.0% 40.3%
II / III 0.7% 12.7% 7.0% 0.0% 20.4%
IV 1.8% 5.4% 6.6% 0.0% 13.8%
V 0.0% 10.5% 15.1% 0.0% 25.6%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2027 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 2.4% 16.8% 34.2% 0.0% 53.4%
II / III 1.1% 9.8% 5.3% 0.0% 16.1%
IV 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.6%
V 1.8% 14.7% 12.4% 0.0% 28.9%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Scenario: PTAP-24 - Five Point Increase 58
($1.05M)
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:
1 Agenda Item #15.3.
City of St. Helena Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 8/7/2023
Scenario: PTAP-24 - EAB ($1.2M)
2023 $1,200,000
$1,072,968
$45,492
$105,261
$385,395
$536,820
$0 $0 $8,964,330 $29,714
$41,780
2%
$0
$97,318
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $1,200,000
$450,699
$0
$0
$87,906
$362,793
$35,944 $0 $9,393,264 $0
$0
2%
$100,297
$602,802
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $1,200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,634 $0 $11,143,266 $0
$0
2%
$7,405
$1,185,740
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $1,200,000
$189,619
$0
$0
$189,619
$0
$11,360 $0 $10,705,119 $282
$0
2%
$32,822
$949,920
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $1,200,000
$89,420
$12,116
$0
$77,305
$0
$24,847 $0 $12,863,377 $1,734
$0
2%
$23,542
$1,052,700
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $417,374 $6,701 $513 $0
Collector $2,099,652 $0 $5,353 $30,550
Residential/Local $3,174,161 $234,149 $25,864 $11,230
Grand Total: $5,691,187 $240,850 $31,730 $41,780
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:
Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2023 $1,200,000 2%
2024 $1,200,000 2%
2025 $1,200,000 2%
2026 $1,200,000 2%
2027 $1,200,000 2%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2023 54 58 2.11 3.83
2024 52 59 2.04 4.07
2025 49 60 2.25 4.51
2026 46 61 2.82 5.64
2027 44 62 2.56 5.12
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2023, prior to applying treatments.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 1.9% 10.1% 21.4% 0.0% 33.5%
II / III 1.5% 12.7% 8.9% 0.0% 23.1%
IV 1.8% 8.0% 8.1% 0.0% 17.9%
V 0.0% 10.5% 15.1% 0.0% 25.6%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2023 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 1.9% 11.3% 27.6% 0.0% 40.8%
II / III 1.5% 12.7% 6.3% 0.0% 20.5%
IV 1.8% 6.8% 7.2% 0.0% 15.8%
V 0.0% 10.5% 12.4% 0.0% 22.9%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2027 after schedulable treatments applied.
Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 3.3% 15.4% 36.3% 0.0% 55.1%
II / III 1.9% 9.5% 5.5% 0.0% 16.9%
IV 0.0% 3.6% 2.2% 0.0% 5.8%
V 0.0% 12.8% 9.4% 0.0% 22.2%
Total 5.2% 41.3% 53.4% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 8/7/2023
City of St. Helena
Scenario: PTAP-24 - EAB ($1.2M)
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00%
Criteria: MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:
1 Agenda Item #15.3.
City of St. Helena Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 8/7/2023
Scenario: PTAP-24 - Budget Needs Average
($3.1M)
2023 $3,100,000
$3,024,654
$45,492
$275,100
$1,295,074
$1,408,987
$0 $0 $11,236,557 $75,346
$6,638
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2024 $3,100,000
$2,889,735
$53,925
$712,393
$202,060
$1,921,357
$148,048 $0 $9,454,023 $654
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2025 $3,100,000
$2,958,714
$0
$0
$388,546
$2,570,168
$17,178 $44,822 $8,121,738 $0
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $3,100,000
$2,938,194
$0
$0
$738,144
$2,200,050
$49,686 $12,314 $6,285,777 $0
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $3,100,000
$3,004,973
$12,116
$73,718
$642,378
$2,276,761
$92,192 $0 $5,416,485 $0
$0
2%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $1,666,330 $6,701 $1,642 $0
Collector $7,811,457 $0 $38,074 $6,638
Residential/Local $5,338,484 $300,403 $36,284 $0
Grand Total: $14,816,271 $307,104 $76,000 $6,638
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:
Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver
Agenda Item #15.3.